The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-12/12/94BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: ADDRESS: /~-0. ( ,"~,,,~~' 'PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE: N E M E M s A G O E S~G ..... AREA CODE EX~ ~ 81GNED PH NE CALL ~ RETURNED ~ WANTSTO WILLCALL URGE~ s~.~o~ .~.,. ~ 3~N3AV W31S3HO )tgYM3alS k IIVHdSV ~m~ONOD sISN ONV-1SI ~I':ISN3dSIO ~3SN3aSIO C Z m f- 310-31S¥M m ONV-ISI ~3~IONOO ~13$N3clSla/ 31j avd ~)Nloglf/8 N ~ ~'lld)lO01S 910S 1"1VN8S¥ ' \] ~:~-,l'~'z~ ~-NO-n¥o-OC3g A~VONfi08 A.L83dOSd - / BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 Business Phone (805) 326-3979 · FAX (805) 326-0576 FAX Transmittal to:f P~ COMPANY: FROM: COMMENTS: 07/16/98 15:49 8805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 7679 CONNECTION TEL 18187017401 CONNECTION ID START TIME 07/16 15:48 USAGE TIME 00'58 PAGES 1 RESULT OK 07/16/98 15:28 ~805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION 0K TX/RX NO. 7676 CONNECTION TEL 18187017401 CONNECTION ID START'TIME 07/16 15:27 USAGE TIME 00'52 PAGES RESULT OK GLENF $ Global Environmental Focus July 16, 1998 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III ii Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA. 93301 Unocal Service Station lS01 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, California 93304 De~ Mr. Wines: This is in reference to the C osure of the property referred above and our discussion yesterday concerning the error in the isite address. Presently, we are in the process of completing the Environmental Site Assessment Report for the above referenced property. I am enclosing four pages in relation to the Closu. ire of this site which references the property at the southwest comer of Brundage Lane and Chesfer Avenue as 1502 Brundage Lane, and not 1501 Brundage Lane. I would greatly appreciate if~iyou could fax me a letter stating that the site address referenced in these letters is in error, and ~l~he correct address should be 1501 Brundage Lane. My fax number is (g18)-70I!-7401. Should you need ~;o reach me, please call me at (818)701- 1207, Extension 105, Thanli: you very much. Sincerely, Pinaki lC Guha Niyogi, REA Senior Environmental Engifieer Encl: As above (4 letters) : TANK CLOSURE REPORT I~NOCAL SERVICE STATION 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BII~RSFIEI.~, C~UFORNIA PrePared for Unocal Corporate Environmental Remediation and Technology 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 San Ramon, California 94583 Prepared by GeoResearch, division of GEOSERVlCES, a California corporation, 1713 Tulare Street Fresno, California 93721 (209) 264-0444 October 19, 1994 957O6OO5OO U1367.TC'I 10't994F2 JUL 16 '98 13:55 818-781-7481 GeoR search 1733 T~lare, Suite ~13 ~o, California (~) ~ By November 14, 1994 Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield Fire Departmer~lt Hazardous Material Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: Addendum to ilthe Tank Closure Report' for Unocal Service Station #1367,' 1502 Brunda~cie Lane, Bakersfield, California. GeoResearch Project No. 9570600500. :. Dear Mr. Wines: In accordance with. your .request, this addendum to the above-referenced report addresses your concern regarding soil backfilled at the former northernmost dispenser island (referenced as disPePser island #3 in the closure report). Field observations on AugUst 9, 1994 (the day of the tank removal) indicated that soil beneath the eastern half of idispenser island #3 had a hydrocarbon odor, but that no soil discoloration was present beneath the dispenser island. Site soils were monitored with an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) during excavating and soil sampling activities. With the approval of Mr. Mark Turk ~f the Bakersfield Fire Department (BFD), approximately 35 cubic yards of soil with field indications of petroleum hydrocarbons were excavated and · soil samples SS9-6 and SS:'I0-10 were collected beneath the eastern dispenser of island #3, Site soils were silty sa.~ds and very fine to very coarse sand. OVA readings of the excavMed soil ranged from less than 10 parts per million (ppm) to greater than 1,000 ppm (ti~e instrument detection limit), The OVA indicated that soil samples SS9-6 and S10-10 had hydrocarbon concentrations greater than 1,000 and 3 ppm, respectively. Based ~!pon field observations and OVA readings, it is estimated that U~367-TC,ADO~ 0~0,~94F ': GeeRese~',h is a division of GEOSERVICIES. a Calilornia corporalion CITY of BAKERSFIELD ' "l,f'E C.4RE" December 14, 1 g94 FIRE DEPN:rrblEHT RECEIVED RI~t; ~dtF.~ ' ' 8a~.-3el? Mr. Robert Boust Senior Environmental Fnoineer Unocal Corporation 2000 Crow Canyon Pla~, 'Suite 400 San Ramon, Ca 94563 RE: UNOCAL SERVICE ~TATION #1367 AT 1502 BRUNDAGE'LANE, IN BAKFRRF1FI D, C',A . Dear Mr. Boust: This Is to Inform you that ti'tis clepmlment has reviewec~ the resuRs of the Tang. Closure Report and Addendum .dated October 19,1994 anti November 14, 1994 respectively, associated with the servt¢le station Site. Based upon the Information provided, this department has determined that the nlirlimum necessary rasponse actions tlave been compleleO, and trlat, at this tirlle, rte tutti, er investigation, remedial or removal action or monitoring is required at the above stated address; Nothing in this det~ermination shaJl constitute or be construed as .& satisfaction or release h'orn li~tl~ll[ty fr~r any conclltlons or claims arising as a result of past, currant, or/uture. operations at this IoeatJon~ Nothing in this determination is intencled or shall be construed to limit the rights of any' par~ies with respect to claims arising out of or relating to deposit or disposal at any other Ioeation of substances removed from the site. Nothing In this determination is intended or shall be construed to limit or preclude the Regional Water Quality Control Board or uny oth=~r agency from taking any further enforcement actions. This letter does notrelleve the tank owner of any responsibilities mandated under the California Health arid Sal~ety Code and Califotnia Water Code if existing, a~lditional~ ~r previously unidentified contamination at the site causes or threatens to cause pollution or , nuisance ~r is found to p(~.se a threat to public health or water quality'. Changes in land use may require further assessment and mitigation. If ym.J h;~ve ;uly que~ons regarding this matter, please contact me at (806)-326-.3979. Sincerely, MOward H. Win~, ~ Hazardous Materials Technician c~: R. Huoy (' .... I.Ino~ai Corporation ~ll 2000 C~'ow Canyon Pla~ ~ 4~ San Ramon, California ~ Telep~ne (510) 867-0706 Fa~imile (510) 277-2~9 UI. O L October 31, 1994 Howard H. Wines, III ~,~m~ Bakersfield Fire Department ,~d~a~. &T~,,Q~y Hazardous Materials Division 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, California 93301 z502 Brundago Lane Bakersfield, California Dear ~r. ~ines: Please review ~e ~2~ached "Ta~ Closure Report" prepared ~eoResearch and dated: October 26, 1994. ~is report doc~en2s the removal o~ ~he ta~s and lines associa2ed with 2he d~olition of the =e~erenced semite st~tion in Au~st o~ 1994. La~ratory analysis of. soil s~ples collected by GeoResearch under the direction of ~. ~rk':[n~icate there ~s no significant cont~ination r~aining under the foyer ta~s, lines, dispensers, hoists, or lube bays. I~ is Un~on OiI. of California's (dba Unocal} technical opinion ~hat no ~ur~her envirq~ental ~ork is re,ired at this site. I~ you agree with this ass~ssment, a clos~e letter woul~ be greatly appreciated. .: I would like to t~e ~this opportunity to thank you for your prompt response to my re~est~for closure at former service station site 5573 located on Ming avenu~ in B~ersfield. The ~roperty has been turned over to the real esta[~e department for dives[men~. Hopefully a new bus,ness will be operating from that location in the near future. If you have any ~ue5t$ons regarding this letter, ~lease feel free to contac~ ~he undersigne~ at (510) 277-2334. Senior Environmental Engineer at[ac~ent cc=R. Ramona R. E. Bock 1715 Tulare, Suite 113 /~(; NOV ~- 6 t994 Fresno, California 98721 (209) 284.04~4 By_.____~ (800) 523-4786 Fax: (209) 264-9800 November 14, 1994 Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Material Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 · RE: Addendum to the Tank Closure Report for Unocal Service Station #1367, 1502 Brundage Lane, Bakersfield, California. GeoResearch Project No. 9570600500. Dear Mr. Wines: In accordance with your request, this addendum to the above-referenced report addresses your concern regarding soil backfilled at the former northernmost dispenser island (referenced as dispenser island #3 in the closure report). Field observations on August 9, 1994 (the day of the tank removal) indicated that soil beneath the eastern half of dispenser island #3 had a hydrocarbon odor, but that no soil discoloration was present beneath the dispenser island. Site soils were monitored with an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) during excavating and soil sampling activities. With the approval of Mr. Mark Turk of the Bakersfield Fire Department (BFD), approximately 35 cubic yards of soil with field indications of petroleum hydrocarbons were excavated and · soil samples SS9-6 and SS10-10 were collected beneath the eastern dispenser of island #3. Site soils were silty sands and very fine to very coarse sand. OVA readings of the excavated soil ranged from less than 10 parts per million (ppm) to greater than 1,000 ppm (the instrument detection limit). The OVA indicated that soil samples SS9-6 and S10-10 had hydrocarbon concentrations greater than 1,000 and 3 ppm, respectively. Based upon field observations and OVA readings, it is estimated that U1367-TC.ADD2 090594F GeoResearch is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation Mr. Howard Wines November 14, 1994 GeoResearch #9570600500 Page 2 3 to 5 cubic yards of soil removed immediately around and beneath the soil sample SS9- 6 location had petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations ranging from approximately 50 to greater than 1,000 ppm. Field observations and OVA readings indicated that the remainder of the excavated soil had petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations ranging from less than 10 ppm to approximately 50 ppm. According to National Weather Service records for Bakersfield, California, on August 9, 1994 the temperature was 100 degrees Fahrenheit during the time period when soil around/beneath dispenser #3 was excavated and the stockpile was sampled. Average wind speed was 8 miles per hour from the northwest and relative humidity was 19 percent. Under such atmospheric conditions, aeration of the approximately 3 to 5 cubic yards of significantly impacted soil during excavation and stockpiling activities would have substantially reduced petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil. The same day, soil sample SP2 was collected from the stockpile generated from the dispenser island #3 excavation. Prior to sampling the stockpile, an OVA was utilized to screen four randomly selected areas of the stockpile. Average OVA .readings taken approximately 6 to 8 inches below the original stockpile surface were approximately 40 parts per million (ppm). Sample SP2 was collected from a representative location approximately 18 to 24 inches below the stockpile surface. In accordance with GeoResearch soil sampling procedures (Appendix B of the tank closure report), the sample was collected by driving a 1.5-inch brass sample tube into the soil utilizing a wooden mallet such that no headspace was present in the tube. Each end of the sample tube was covered with aluminum foil, capped with polyethylene lids, and taped. The sample tube was labeled, the sample number was documented on a chain-of-custody form, and the sample was transported in an ice chest kept at approximately 4 degrees centigrade until delivery to the laboratory. On August 18, 1994, GeoResearch received analytical results that indicated soil sample SS9-6 contained a total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPH), toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes concentrations of 45,000, 890,480, and 4,200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), respectively. The sample did not contain a detectable benzene concentration. Sample SS10-10 (collected four feet below SS9o6) contained TPPH, toluene, and total xylenes concentrations of 1.2, 0.022, and 0.0080 mg/kg, respectively, but no detectable concentrations of benzene. Sample SP2 contained TPPH and total xylenes concentrations of 4.2 and 0.018 mg/kg, respectively, but did not contain detectable benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene concentrations. U1367-TC.ADD2 090594F Mr. Howard Wines November 14, 1994 GeoResearch #9570600500 Page 3 Following the review of the analytical results of confirmation soil samples collected beneath USTs, dispensers, and hoists, GeoResearch Associate Geologist Warren Gross contacted (via the telephone) Mr. Turk on or about August 25, 1994 regarding backfilling site excavations. Based upon laboratory results of confirmation samples, Mr. Turk indicated that backfilling site excavations was appropriate. In consideration of the analytical results of stockpile soil sample SP2 and the depth to groundwater of approximately 195 feet beneath the site, on September 1, 1994, GeoResearch recommended and received approval from Mr. Turk (via a telephone with GeoResearch Senior Staff Geologist Russell Anthony) to backfill the dispenser island #3 excavation with the soil excavated around/beneath the dispenser. Soil from around/beneath dispenser island #3 was backfilled approximately 24 days following excavation of the soil and sampling of the stockpile. During that time period and during backfilling operations, aeration of the soil in summer temperatures would have further reduced petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the stockpiled soil. Based upon the atmospheric conditions, field observations, and analytical results discussed above, GeoResearch believes that backfilling the dispenser island #3 excavation with original soil was both reasonable and appropriate. GeoResearch also considers the site suitable to receive clean closure. If you have any questions or require additional information please call the undersigned at (209) 264-0444. Sincerely, Warren W.Gross, CEG 1528 Senior Staff Geologist Associate Geologist cc: Bob Boust, Unocal U1367-TC.ADD2 090594F UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAUINATION SITE REPORT NAME OF INDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT PHONE SIGNA~ REPR~S~NTIN~ ~ O~N~PERATOR ~ R~IO~L~ARD ADDRESS S~E~ ~ ~ATE ZIP NAME I ~NTACTPE~ON I P~NE STRE~ C~ ~ATE ~P ADDRESS C~OSSSTREET WPEOFAREA ~ COUMERCaL ~ ~NDUSTRmL ~ RUR~ WPEOFaUmNESS ~ RETA~LFUELSTAT~ON ~ RESIDENT'~ ~ OmER ~ FARM ~ OmER LOCAL AGENCY AGENCY ~ME ~NTACT PERSON P~NE REGtONAL BOARD P~NE ( ) (1) NAME QU~T~ LOST (G~LONS) DATE DISCOVERED ~ ~W DI~VE~D ~ IN~ORY ~R~ ~ SU~URFA~ ~NITOR~G ~ NUISA~E ~NDtT~NS o ~1 8~1 °ol q ~1 q YI ~ vi ~ TANK TEST ~ TANK REMOVAL ~ OTHER mUR~ OF D~SCHARGE T~KS ONLV~ACtW abram& CAUSE(S) ~ TANK LEAK ~ UNKNO~ [~ IOjo*O ~. ~ FIBERGLAS ~ OVERFILL ~ RUPTURE*AlLURE ~ PIPING LEAK AGE ~ YRS ~ STEEL ~ ~RROSION ~ UNKNO~ ~ECK ONE ONLY ~ UNDETERMINED ~ SOILONLY ~ GROUNDWA~R ~ DRINKINGWA~R-(CHECKONLYIFWA~R~LLSHAVEAC~LYBEENAFFEC~D) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ SITEIN~STIGATIONINPR~RESS,DEFININGE~OFPROB~M, ~ C~'UPINPR~RESS~ SIGNEDOFF,~'NUPCOMPLE~DORUNNE~AR~ ~ NO ACTION TAKEN ~ POST~NUPMONITORINGINP~RE~ ~ ~FUNDSAVAIL~TOPR~ED ~ EV~UATI~C~UP~RNATI~S CHECK ~PROPRIATE ACT~N(S) (SEE BACK FOR DETAILS) ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ EX~VATE&DISP~E(ED) ~ CONTA[NMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TR~TGROUNDWATER(G~ ~ REPL~E SUPPLY (RS) ~ TREATMENTATH~P(HU) ~ NO~TIONREQUIRED(NA) ~ O~ER(O~ L 1995 INSTRUCTIONS EMERGENCY '~' CURRENT STATUS ~whether emergency response-personnel and equipment were involved at Indicate the category which best describes the current status of the case. any time. If so, a Hazardous Material Incident Report should be, filed with · ? Check one box only. The response should be relative to the case type. For the State office of Emergency Servi6es (OES)'.at 2800 Meadowview Road, example, if case type is "Ground Water", then "Current Status" should refer to Sacramento, CA 95832. Cop~es of the OES report form may be obtained at your- the status of the ground water investigation or cleanup, as opposed to that of local underground storage tank permitting agency. Indicate whether the OES -~ soil. report has been filed as of the date_ of this report. IMRORTANT: THE INFORMATION PROVIDED iN THIS FORM IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL LOCAL AGENCY ONLY '~ STatISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REPRESENTING THE To avoid duplicate not,ification pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section " OFFICIAL POSITION OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY 25180.7, a designated government employee should sign and date the form in this block. A signature here does not mean that the leak has been determined' REMEDIAL ACTION to pose a significant threat to---~m~health or safety, only that notificatiop' Indicate which actions have been used to cleanup or remediate ~e leak. .. Descriptions of options follow: procedures have been followed if required. REPORTED BY " ~ - install horizontal impermeable layer to reduce rainfall Enter your name, telephone number, and address. Indicate which'party you infiltration. Containment Barrier - install vertical dike to block horizontal movement represent and provide company or agency name. of contaminant. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Excavate and Dispose - ~emove contaminated soil and dispose in approved Enter name, telephone number, contact person, and address'·of th~ party site. responsible for the leak. The responsible party would normally be the tank ..Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil and treat (includes owner. ~ spreading or land farming). Remove Free Product - remove floating product from water SITE LOCATION table. Enter information regarding the tank facility and surrounding area. At a Pump and Treat Groundwater - generally employed to remove dissolved minimum, you must provide the facility name and full address, contaminants. Enhanced Biod~gradation - use of any available technology to promote IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES'., bacterial decomposition of contaminants. Enter names of the local ageo¢y anJ~Regional"Water Quality Control Board Replace Supply - provide alternative water supply to affected involved. .: ~arties. ~. Treatment at Hookup - install water treatment devices at each dwelling or SUBSTANCES INVOLVED ' other place of-use. Enter the name and quantity list of the hazardous substan~'e invglved. Room is No Action Required - incident is minor, requiring no provided for information on twb substances if appropriate. If more than two·'. remedial action, substances leaked, list the two of most concern for cleanup. . COMMENTS - Use this space to elaborate on any,aspects of the incident. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT~ · ~E - Sign .the form in the space provided. Provide information regarding the discovery and abatement of the leak. ~ION SOURCE/CAUSE , If the form is completed by the tank owner or his agent, retain the last copy Indicate sodrce(s) o~ leak. Provide details on tank age; capacity and and forward the remaining copies in tact to your local tank permitting agency material if known. Check box(es) indicating cause of leak. for distributidn.' 1. Original - Local Tank Permitting Agency CASE TYPE 2. State Water R~sources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, ~-- ~the case type category for this leak. Check one box only. Case type Underground T'ank Program, P. O. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95801 is based on the most sensitive resource affected. For example, if both soil 3. Regional Water Quality Control Board and groundwater have been affected, cas~ type will be "Ground ~ater". 4. County Board of Supervisors or designee to receive Proposition 65 Indicate "Drinking Water" only if one or more municipal or domestic water notifications. _ wells have actually been affected. A "Ground Water" designati6n does not 5. Owner/responsible party. imply that the affected water cannot be, or is not, used for drinking water, - . but only that water w~lls have not,yet been affected. It is understood that case type may change upon further i:nvestigation. : cIrrof BA KERSFIE~D~ "~vs c,4~s" i December 14, 1994 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE M. R. KEU.Y BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Robert Boust, Senior Environmental Engineer Unocal Corporation 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 San Ramon, CA 94583 RE: Unocal Service Station #1367 at 1502 Brundage Lane in Bakersfield Ca. Dear Mr. BouSt, Attached, please find the closure letter for the above referenced site. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for-meeting with representatives of this office on Thursday, December 8, 1994 to discuss the particular concerns surrounding the closure of this site. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician" HHW/dlm cc: R. Huey W. Gross "WE CARE" : December 14, 1994 , FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Mr. Robert BouSt; Senior Environmental Engineer Unocal Corporation 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 San Ramon, Ca 94583 RE: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION #1367 AT 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE, IN BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Mr. Boust: This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results of the Tank Closure Report and Addendum dated October 19,1994 and November 14, 1994 reSpectively, associated with the service station site. Based upon the information provided, this department has determined that-the minimum necessary response actions have been completed, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial or removal action or monitoring is required at the above stated address. Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a. satisfaction or release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result of past, current, or future operations at this location. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to limit the rights of_ any parties with respect to claims arising out of or relating to. deposit or disposal at any other location of substances removed from the site. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to limit or preclude the Regional Water Quality Control Board or any other agency from taking any further enforcement actions. This letter does not relieve the tank owner of any reSponsibilitieS mandated under the CaJifornia Health and Safety Code and California Water Code if existing, additional, or" previously unidentified contamination at the site causes or threatens to cause pollution or nuisance or is found to pose a threat to Public health or water quality. Changes in land use may require further assessment and mitigation. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician cc: R. Huey RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: Business Name: Business Phone: FAX: InspeCtor's Name: Time of Call: Date: tz-/~ /'%/-t. Time: ~0 '~5~- # Min: Type of Call: Incoming ~'~] Outgoing [ ] Returned [ ] Content of Call: ~ I~,~..~ ~ ~ --~ (~y,~. (:~z-o-%~ RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location:. ~ 5'"D ~ ~¢'.,-J~,~.~ /~,, ID# Business Name: ~ Contact Name: ~d~'/¥,.,, ~_F~ %~ Business Phone: ~/ ~-~- ~- ~:~;~ FAX: InspeCtor's Name: ~ L~ Time of Call: Date: / ~-~ / ~ d_, Time: ~ ~ ~' # Min: Type of Call: incoming [ ] Outgoing t~] Returned Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: , NOV-18-94 FRI 09:54 SJV.~,0D. , FAX NO, 805 861 2060 P, 01/06 San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District FAX Transmitta eet ou Region Date' , ~ - Bakersfield, CA 93301 Voice: (80J) From: .... ~o~ ~qy , FAX: (805) 861-2060 Name Company Total Pages (including cover page)' ~ F~x No.: .Comments: \ s~.._~o~ ~.~ --~'olto~g. ~t-~-7 ~.,-t ~k.~.s¢.,,~4 ~, .--. t l, .. NOV-18-94 FRI 09:54 SJ~PCD Ffl× NO, 805 861 2060 P, 02/06 '" RULE 4651 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS FROM · DECONTAMINATION OF SOIL (Adopted April 16, 1992, Amended "~'"' December 17, 1992) 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from the excavation and treatment of soil that has been contaminated by organic liquid as a result of leakage from storage or transfer facilities, from accidental spillage, or other deposition. 2.0 Applicability This rule shall ap?ly to the excavation and treatment of soil that has been contaminated by organic liquid as a result of leakage ~rom storage or transfer facilities, from accidental spillage, or other deposition. 3.0 Definitions 3.1 Active Soil Aeration Pile: a pile of contaminated soil with a volume at least one cubic yard which is undergoing limited aeration in accordance with the requirements contained in Section 5.2. 3.2 Contaminated Soil: soil which registers 50. ppm or greater of VOC when "',~...,... measured as hexane at a distance of three (3) inches above the surface with an organic vapor analyzer, or soil containing VOC which has been identified for decontamination by the designated lead agency. 3.3 Decontamination: the removal of VOC from contaminated soil by an approved process. 3.4 Organic Content: the VOC concentration used to determine the daily rate at which contaminated soil may be added to an active soil aeration pile; 3.5 Organic Vapor Analyzer: a hydrocarbon analyzer which satisfies the specification requirements of EPA Method 21, 40. CFR Part 4.0 Exemptions 4.1 The requirements of this rule shall not apply to: 4.1.1 Treatment of less than one (1) cubic yard of contaminated soil. 4.1.2 Accidental spillage of one barrel (42 gallons) or less of liquids containing VOC. '-.,~...,-. srcu^~,c~ 4651 - 1 ~/~7/~- NOV-18-94 FRI 09:66 SJVU~?OD F~× NO, 805 861 2060 P, 03/06 4.1.3 Contaminated soll exposed for the sole purpose of sampling. 4. I.4 Soil contaminated solely by VOC containing liquid that has an initial bolling point o£ 3020 F or higher, as determined by ASTM D86-78, provided that the soil is not heated above ambient temperature and samples of the contaminating liquid can be obtained. 4.1.5 Soil which is contaminated through natural seepage of liquids from natural sources. 4,I.6 The emergency excavation and decontamination of soil performed by, under the jurisdiction of, or pursuant to the requirements of, an authorized health officer, agricultural commissioner, fire protection officer, or other authorized agency officer. Whenever possible, the Al>CO shall be notified prior to commencing such excavation. 5.0 Requirements 5.1 Excavation of Contaminated Soil 5.1.1 The owner or operator who is performing a.n excavation as the result of the removal of an underground storage tank, leakage from a storage or transfer facility, accidental spillage, or other deposition, shall /.,';~'.':"::!.':".'X monitor for VOC contaminated soil during the excavation of the material. 5.1.2 If VOC contaminated soil is detected, the excavated soil shall be either transported off-site for treatment, recycling, disposal in an approved disposal site, stockpiled or returned to excavation, and covered as required by Section 5.1.3. 5,1.3 Contaminated soil which is not being treated shall be covered except when soil is being added or removed. The soil may be covered with a layer of uncontaminated soil no less than six (6) inches deep; or, it may be covered with a tarp or other covering, provided no head space where vapors may accumulate is formed. 5.2 Limited Aeration 5.2.1 Limited aeration shall be subject to the following conditions: 5.2.1.1 is prohibited within 1000 feet of the nearest residence unless a risk assessment performed using the CAPCOA 4651 - 2 ~/1~/02 "" NOV-18-94 FRI 0@:~ SJI~PCD FAX NO, 806 861 2080 P. 04/06 Air Toxics Assessment Manual indicates an' excess cancer risk of less than one (1) in a million. 5.2.1.2 the rate at which contaminated soil may be added to an active soft aeration pile shall be limited by the soil's organic content. 5.2.1.3 the maximum rates for the addition of contaminated soil that may be added to soil which is already aerating is listed in Table 1. TabIe 1 Organic Content Allowable Rate of Limited Aeration (ppm by weight) (Cubic yards/day) 0 - 50 Exempt 51 - 100 600 101 - 500 120 501 - 1000 60 100 - 2000 30 2001 - 3000 15 3001 - 4000 10 4001 - 5000 8 5001 or greater none 5.2.1.4 The Al'CO shall be notified in writing for all limited aeration projects. Notification shall include: 5.2.1.4.1 the applicant's business name, 5.2.1.4.2 address, 5.2.1.4.3 quantity of soil 5.2.1.4.4_. daily aeration rate, 5.2.1.4.5 location of stockpile and aeration area including distances from nearest residence, and "~x,....~. SJVUAVCD 4651 -3 12/IV92 = NOV-18-94 FRI 09:56 SJ~iiPCD FA× NO. 80~_861 2060 P. 06/06 5.2.1.4.6 expected life of the project. . ............ ~ ,.! 5.3 Decontamination Systems 5.3.1 Treating contaminated soil, except as allowed in Section 5.2 (Limited Aeration), shall be done by implementing one of the following decontamination systems: 5,3.1.1 installation and operation of a VOC collection and control system for the in-situ treatment of the contaminated soil; or 5.3.1,2 installation and operation of a VOC collection and control system for the on-site treatment of the contaminated soil. 5.3.2 An Authority to Construct shall be obtained prior to the installation of equipment required for u. decomamfnation system. 6.0 Administrative Requirements 6.1 Test Methods 6.1.1 Tllewith initialAsTMbOilingD86_Vs.PO[nt of a liquid shall be measured in accordance 6.1.2 The VOC eon¢¢ntratioa of contaminated soils shall be measured using an organic vapor analyzer which satisfies this specificatiou requirements of EPA Method 21, 40 CFR Part 60. 6.1.3 The organic content of soil shall be determined by EPA Reference Method 8240, 8015 or the gas chromatographic method in the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) M~nual (October, 1989) as approved by the California Department of Health Services. 6.2 $oil Sampling Procedure One composite sample shall be collected and analyzed for every 50 cubic yards of excavated contaminated soil to be aerated. At least one (1) composite sample shall be collected from each inactive, uncovered storage pile within 24 hours of excavation. Samples are not required if the soil is uncontaminated. 6.2.1 A composite sample shall consist of one sample taken from the center of each of four (4) equal sectors of the area required to be sampled SSVU~U'CD 4651 - 4 , NOV-18-94 FRI 09:56 SJ~POD FAX NO, 806 861 2060 P, 06/06 using the procedures described below unless other methods are '~.'..~,_,., approved by the APCO. 6.2.2 Samples shall be taken from at least three (3) inches below the surface of the pile using a driven-tube type sampler, capped and sealed with inert materials, and extruded in the lab in order to reduce the loss of volatile materials; or by using a clean brass or stainless steel tube (at least three (3) inches long) driven into the soil with a suitable instrument. The ends of the brass tube shall then be covered with aluminum foil, then plastic end caps, and finally wrapped with a suitable tape. The samples shall then be immediately placed on ice, or dry ice, for transport to a laboratory. 6.2.3 Chain-of-custody records shall be kept to document possession of a sample from the time it i~ taken in the field until it is analyzed. 6.3 Offsets If a decontaminatinn/treatment system is required solely to comply with the requirements of this rule, such system shall not be subject to Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review),, provided the system includes Best Available Control Technology and the emissions do not exceed two (2) tons .- per year of any affected pollutant. "--'" 7.0, Compliance Schedule The requirements of this rule become effective September 19, 1991 except for the following: 7.1 Any soil excavation or decontamination project which received District approval prior to September 19, 1992 may continue their operation until the soil is no longer contaminated or until July 1, 1992, whichever comes first. 7.2 Amy decontamination system whose initial installation occurs on or after September 19, 1992 shall be in full compliance with thc provisions of the rule upon initial operation. '~..__.,-; sJvu^~,cp 4651 - $ W17/92 Unocal Corporation ~ 2000 Crow Canyon Pla~[~ite 400 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone (510) 867-0706 Facsimile (510) 277-2309 UNOCAL October 31, 1994 Howard H. Wines, III Northern Region Bakersfield Fire Department Corporate Environmental Remediation &Technology Hazardous Materials Division 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, California 93301 UNOCAL SERVICE STATION ~1367 1502 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Wines: Please review the attached "Tank Closure Report" prepared by GeoResearch and dated October 26, 1994. This report documents the removal of the tanks and lines associated with the demolition of the referenced service station in August of 1994. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected by GeoResearch under the direction of Mr. Turk indicate there is no significant contamination remaining under the former tanks, lines, dispensers, hoists, or lube bays. It is Union Oil of California's (dba Unocal) technical opinion that no further environmental work is required at this site. If you agree with this assessment, a closure letter would be greatly appreciated. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your prompt response to my request for closure at former service station site 5573 located on Ming avenue in Bakersfield. The property has been turned over to the real estate department for divestment. Hopefully a new business will be operating from that location in the near future. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (510) 277-2334. Senior Environmental Engineer attachment cc: R. Ra~ond w/o R. E. Bock w[o TANK CLOSURE REPORT UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CAMFORNIA Prepared for Unocal Corporate EnVironmental Remediation and Technology 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 San Ramon, California 94583 Prepared by GeoResearch, a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation, 1713 Tulare Street Fresno, California 93721 (209) 264-0444 October 19, 1994 957O6OO5OO U1367.TC1 101994F2 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION ....... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND ........................................ I 3.0 GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY ................................. 3 4.0 OBSERVATIONS AND PROCEDURES ........................... 3 4.1 GASOLINE USTs ...................................... 4 4.2 WASTE-OIL USTs ..................................... 4 4.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES .................. 5 4.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS .................................. 6 4.5 STOCKPILED SOIL .................................... 6 5.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES/LABORATORY RESULTS .............. 7 5.1 GASOLINE USTs ...................................... 7 5.2 WASTE-OIL USTs ..................................... 7 5.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES .................. 8 5.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS .................................. 9 5.5 STOCKPILED SOIL ...................... ' .............. 9 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................ 10 6.1 GASOLINE USTs ...................................... 10 6.2 WASTE-OIL USTs ..................................... 10 6.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES .................. 11 6.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS .................................. 12 6.5 STOCKPILED SOIL .................................... 12 7.0 RECOMMENDATION ........................................ 12 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................. 13 U1367.TC1 101994F2 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: RESULTS OF TPPH AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER GASOLINE USTs TABLE 2: RESULTS OF LEAD AND TRPH ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER WASTE-OIL USTs AND HOISTS TABLE 3: RESULTS OF HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER WASTE-OIL USTs ON 8/9/94 TABLE 4: RESULTS OF TPPH AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER DISPENSERS TABLE 5: RESULTS OF TPPH, BTEX, AND TRPH ANALYSES OF SOIL STOCKPILE SAMPLES COLLECTED 8/9/94 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN AND SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PERMITS/DOCUMENTATION - DEMOLITION AND UST REMOVAL PERMITS, TANK/RINSATE DISPOSAL MANIFESTS, SOILS COMPACTION CERTIFICATION APPENDIX B: GEORESEARCH SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES APPENDIX C: LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS U1367,TC1 101994F2 iii STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION Information provided in this report for GeoResearch Project Number 9570600500 is intended exclusively for Unocal Corporate Environmental Remediation and Technology (CERT) for the evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbon occurrence as it pertains to the subject site at the time the data were collected. The professional services have been performed in accordance with practices generally accepted by professional geologists, hydrologists, engineers, and environmental scientists. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. As with all subsurface investigations, there is no guarantee that the work conducted will identify any or all sources or locations of contamination. This report is issued with the understanding that Unocal CERT is responsible for ensuring that the information contained in this report is brought to the attention of the appropriate regulatory agency. The enclosed report has been reviewed by an engineering geologist certified by the State of California whose signature and certification number appear below. Warren W.Gross,C.E.G. #1528 Senior Staff Geologist Associate Geologist ,4,",'"4 .? V ","?!-'. :'1.:. ",.~'.'%,. .,,,: ,..,.% ,.. ........ . ,t~ ",;.. .,' /; ..,: .? "q;, ,~ .". .., .' :',.'7' U1367.TC~ 101994F2 iV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In August 1994, facilities at Unocal Service Station No. 1367, 1502 Brundage Lane, Bakersfield, California, were demolished and removed. GeoResearch observed the removal of the USTs, collected confirmation soil samples beneath former UST, dispenser, and automotive hoist locations, and collected characterization soil samples from soil stockpiles. The removal of USTs and confirmation soil sampling was observed and approved by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Material Division (BFD), the local oversight agency. Soil samples were analyzed for constituents required by the BFD. Three different service station configurations existed at the site since 1936. A Phase II subsurface site investigation, conducted by GeoResearch in September 1993, did not identify any areas of significant hydrocarbon contamination around and/or beneath existing and former station facilities. During closure activities, field observations did ,~¢~t indicate that soils beneath/around gasoline and waste-oil USTs were significantly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. Analytical results indicate that confirmation samples collected beneath former gasoline USTs did not contain detectable concentrations of total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPPH) as gasoline or benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX). Confirmation samples collected beneath waste-oil USTs did not contain detectable concentrations of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) or halogenated volatile organics (HVO). Samples collected beneath waste-oil tanks contained lead concentrations ranging from 1.3 to 2.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Field observations and analytical results of samples collected beneath the former hoists do not indicate that leakage from the former hoists impacted site soils. Based upon field indications, petroleum hydrocarbon affected soil was excavated beneath two dispenser islands. Analytical results indicate that confirmation samples collected beneath dispensers contained TPPH concentrations from below detebtion 'limits to 1.2 mg/kg and no detectable benzene concentrations. Analytical reports indicate that stockpiled soil from beneath/around former USTs and dispensers contained TPPH concentrations ranging from below detection limits to 12 mg/kg and no detectable benzene concentrations. Stockpiled soil from beneath/around waste-oil USTs and hoists did not contain detectable TRPH concentrations. Based upon analytical results, stockpiled soil was utilized as backfill for site excavations. Based upon information from the Phase II investigation, field observations during the UST removals and soil sampling activities, and analytical results of soil samples collected beneath former station facilities and from stockpiled soil, no further action at this site is recommended. Closure of this former UST site by the BFD appears appropriate. U1367.TC1 101994F2 V 1.0 INTRODUCTION In August 1994, facilities at Unocal Service Station No. 1367, 1502 Brundage Lane, Bakersfield, California (Figure 1), were demolished and removed by Wegener Construction of Bakersfield, California. Two approximately 10,000-gallon-capacity single- walled steel gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs), two approximately 500-gallon- capacity single-wall waste-oil USTs, six fuel dispensers, two automotive hoists, and associated fuel/vapor-recovery piping were removed from the site. On August 9, 1994, GeoResearch observed the removal of the USTs, collected soil samples beneath former UST, dispenser, and automotive hoist locations, and collected soil samples from soil stockpiles. Work was completed in accordance with the Proposed Scope of Work dated AUgust 2, 1994, which was submitted to Unocal and authorized by Mr. Robert Boust. Mr. Boust and Mr. Frank Pinnell, representing Unocal, were onsite during the IJST removals. Removal of the USTs was observed and approved by Mr. Mark Turk, Inspector, of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Material Division (BFD), the local oversight agency. Soil samples collected beneath former UST, dispenser, and hoist locations were collected at the direction or with the approval of Mr. Turk. Soil samples were analyzed for constituents required by the BFD. Copies of demolition/UST removal permits, tank/rinsate disposal manifests, and the soils compaction certification in Appendix A were provided by Wegener Construction. All laboratory analyses were completed by Sequoia Analytical, Redwood City, California. 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND According to a PHR Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phase I enviror~mental site assessment of the subject property dated July 30, 1993 (provided by Unocal), three different service station configurations with different station building, service bay, fuel dispenser, product piping, and UST locations have operated at the site, at different times, since 1936. In 1969, the latest service station with three service bays, three dispenser islands, one 550-gallon waste-oil UST, and two 10,000-gallon fuel USTs was constructed and opened for business. According to the Phase I report, steel product lines installed in 1969 were replaced with fiberglass piping in 1980. The Phase I report indicates that the regular fuel UST failed an integrity test in 1980 due to a weld failure around a bung flange. According to the. report, however, the product USTs passed integrity tests in 1981 and all station USTs U1367.TC1 101994F2 1 passed annual integrity tests from 1986 to 1993. Product lines were replaced in 1988 and overspill containment boxes were installed on each UST in 1991. ^ Phase II subsurface site investigation was conducted by GeoResearch at the service station September 13-15, 1993. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the presence and extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in site soils which may have resulted from existing and former motor vehicle fuel dispensing and service facilities at the subject property. Eleven hollow-stem auger soil borings and five hand-auger borings were drilled near existing and former site facilities (Figure 2). Selected soil samples collected from borings adjacent to existing and/or former gasoline tanks and dispenser islands were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX). Selected soil samples collected from borings near an existing waste-oil UST and near a former drain were analyzed for TPH-G, BTEX, and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). Selected soil samples collected from borings near existing and former automotive hoists were analyzed for TRPH only. Laboratory reports indicate that none of the analyzed soils samples collected near existing and former gasoline USTs (and product piping near the USTs) contained .detectable concentrations of TPH-G or BTEX. No detectable TRPH, TPH-G, or BTEX concentrations were reported in the analyzed soil sample collected adjacent to the existing waste-oil tank. According to laboratory reports, only one of the analyzed soil samples collected near existing and former dispenser islands (and product piping near the islands) contained TPH-G or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Soil sample SB9-20, collected approximately 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) near a former dispenser island, contained a total xylenes concentration of 0.015 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) but did not contain detectable concentrations of TPH-G, benzene, .toluene, or ethylbenzene. Laboratory reports indicate that none of the analyzed soil samples collected near existing and former hoists contained detectable TRPH concentrations. No detectable TRPH, TPH- G, or BTEX concentrations were reported in the analyzed soil samples collected near a former drain and potential seepage pit. Based upon the Phase II investigation field observations and analytical results, no areas of significant hydrocarbon contamination around and/or beneath existing and former station facilities were identified. U1367,TC1 101994F2 2 3.0 GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY Native soils beneath the site consist of alluvial material derived from the Sierra Nevada to the east and the Tehachapi mountains to the south. This heterogeneous section of Pleistocene and Pliocene alluvium is on the order of 5,000 feet thick in the Bakersfield area and is composed of unconsolidated sand, gravel, silt, clayey sand and clay. Pliocene-Pleistocene continental clastic deposits overlie the Tertiary basement. The Tertiary basement, composed of granitic and metamorphic rocks, underlies the clastic section at a depth on the order of 15,000 feet below ground surface (Hackel, 1960). Field observations from the Phase II investigation and during soil sampling activities following the UST, dispenser, and hoist removals indicate that soil beneath the site is composed primarily of silty sand to a depth of approximately ten feet bgs and both silty sand and very fine to very coarse sand from approximately ten to forty feet bgs. According to Kern County Water Agency (1992), depth to ground water beneath the site is approximately 195 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction is to the southeast. 4.0 OBSERVATIONS AND PROCEDURES GeoResearch personnel observed the UST removals and collected soil confirmation and characterization samples August 9, 1994. UST removals were observed and approved by Mr. Turk of the BFD. Confirmation soil samples beneath former UST, dispenser, and hoist locations were collected at the direction or with the approval of Mr. Turk. All work performed by GeoResearch was conducted under the direction of a State of California-certified engineering geologist and in accordance with GeoResearch soil sampling procedures (Appendix B). GeoResearch personnel conducted all activities in accordance with a site-specific health and safety plan. During soil sampling activities, soils were monitored with an organic vapor an~.lyzer (OVA) for a preliminary indication of the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. A Foxboro model 128 OVA with a flame-ionization detector (FID) and a hydrocarbon detection range from 0 to 1,000 parts per million (ppm) was utilized during sampling activities. The OVA was properly calibrated prior to use. For clarity in this report, former dispenser islands are designated #1, #2, and #3 (Figure 2). The two gasoline USTs are designated T1 and T2. The two waste-oil USTs are designated T3 and T4. Soil samples collected beneath USTs were designated by tank number, location beneath the tank (where E indicates the east half of the tank, W indicates the west half of the U1367.TCt 101994F2 3 tank, and C indicates the center of the tank), and depth bgs in feet. For example, T1-E- 13 is the 'identification number for the soil sample collected 13 feet bgs at the east half of tank T1 (Figure 2). Soil samples collected beneath former dispensers and automotive hoists were designated by SS, a consecutive sample number, and depth bgs in feet (e.g., SS1-4). Samples collected from soil stockpiles were designated by SP and a consecutive sample number (e.g., SP1). 4,1 GASOLINE USTs Soil above the USTs had been removed and stockpiled before GeoResearch arrived on site. According to Mr. Jerry Hale, Wegener Construction foreman, soil above the gasoline USTs was unstained and without significant gasoline odor. Prior to their removal, the USTs were triple rinsed by Wegener, packed with dry ice and rendered inert. Mr. Turk approved the removal of the USTs after they were checked with an explosivity meter. Upon removal, both gasoline USTs appeared to be in good condition. The bottoms of both tanks were rusted but no corrosion pitting or holes were observed on either UST. Soil in the gasoline UST excavation was visibly clean. At the direction of Mr. Turk, soil samples T1-E-13, T1-W-13, T2-E-13, and T2-W-13 were collected approximately 2 feet below the tanks and soil samples T1-E-17, T1-W-17, T2-E-17, and T2-W-17 were collected approximately 6 feet below the tanks (Figure 2). OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples. 4.2 WASTE-OIL USTs During the removal of dispenser island #1, Wegener Construction un'covered an approximately 500-gallon-capacity waste-oil UST. GeoResearch observed that the UST, designated T3 (Figure 2), was partially crushed and had large holes on its upper side. According to Mr. Hale, the tank was damaged during the breaking and removal of the island and canopy support concrete. Waste-oil stains were observed inside and on the top of the tank. The UST was rusted but no corrosion pitting or holes were observed on the bottom of the tank. No stained soil was observed in the waste-oil tank/dispenser island excavation. Based upon the fact that the tank was located almost directly beneath the northernmost dispenser of the island, Mr. Turk indicated that collection of soil samples beneath the northernmost dispenser would satisfactorily evaluate soils beneath both the dispenser and U1367.TC1 101994F2 4 the waste-oil tank. At the direction of Mr. Turk, soil samples SS5-6 and SS6-8 (following the soil sample designations for samples collected beneath dispensers) were collected beneath the northernmost dispenser of island #1. OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples. A second waste-oil tank, designated T4 (Figure 2), located near the southwest corner of the former station building was also removed. Approximately 5 cubic yards of soil which appeared to be lightly to moderately stained and with a slight hydrocarbon odor adjacent to the tank was excavated. An approximately one-foot thick layer of discolored soil approximately 8 to 10 inches bgs was observed on the west and south sides of the waste-oil tank excavation. The soil discoloration appeared to have been caused by water from a broken underground pipe that extended west of the waste-oil tank. OVA readings of the odorless discolored soil did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. T4 was rusted but no corrosion pitting or holes were observed on the tank. No stained soil was observed beneath the tank. At the direction of Mr. Turk, soil samples T4-C-6 and.T4-C-10 were collected beneath the tank. OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples. 4.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES Soil beneath island #2 had a hydrocarbon odor. OVA readings of the odorous soil ranged from approximately 50 to 250 ppm. No soil discoloration was observed. With the approval of Mr. Turk, approximately 25 cubic yards of sandy soil with significant field indications of petroleum hydrocarbons were excavated, samples SS1-6 and SS2-8 were collected beneath the northem dispenser, and samples SS3-6 and SS4-8 were collected beneath the southern dispenser of island #2 (Figure 2). OVA readings in SS1-6 and SS3- 6 were 30 and 20 ppm, respectively. OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in SS2-8 or SS4-8. As indicated above, a waste-oil tank was removed beneath dispenser islan(J #1. No soil discoloration was observed and no hydrocarbon odors were detected in the excavation around/beneath island #1. With the approval of Mr. Turk, soil samples SS5-6 and SS6-8 were collected beneath the northern dispenser and samples SS7-6 and SS8-8 were collected beneath the southern dispenser of isl~.nd #2 (Figure 2). OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples collected beneath island #2. Soil beneath the eastern half of island #3 had a hydrocarbon odor. OVA readings of the odorous soil ranged from approximately 100 to greater than 1,000 ppm. OVA readings of soil in the western half of the excavation did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. No soil discoloration was observed beneath dispenser island #3. With the U1367.TC1 101994F2 5 approval of Mr. Turk, approximately 35 cubic yards of soil with significant field indications of petroleum hydrocarbons were excavated and soil sample SS9-6 was collected beneath the eastern dispenser of island #3. The OVA reading of SS9-6 was greater than 1,000 ppm. Soils in the vicinity of SS9-6 with elevated OVA readings were excavated in the process of sample collection. Based upon the elevated OVA reading in SS9-6, Mr. Turk directed the collection of sample SS10-10 beneath the eastern dispenser. The OVA reading of SS10-10 was 3 ppm. Soil samples SS11-6 and SS12-10 were collected under the western dispenser of island #3. OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in SSll-6 or SS12-10. Based upon the fact that samples collected from Phase II borings near product lines and piping fittings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons and based upon the close proximity of product piping to the UST and dispenser island excavations, Mr. Turk indicated that soil sampling beneath product lines was not required. No soil samples were collected beneath product piping or piping fittings. 4.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS Two automotive hoists had been removed before GeoResearch arrived on site. No soil discoloration was observed in the excavations around/beneath the former hoist locations. With the approval of Mr. Turk, soil samples SS13-10 and SS14-10 were collected beneath the former western and eastem hoists, respectively (Figure 2). OVA readings did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the samples. 4.5 STOCKPILED SOIL Calculations based upon the observed dimensions of site excavations and stockpiles indicate that approximately 325 cubic yards of soil (in-place voiume)' excavated beneath/around former USTs, dispenser islands, and automotive hoists was stockpiled on site. Stockpile samples SP1 and SP3 were collected from stockpiles generated from the gasoline USTs excavation. Sample SP2 was collected from the stockpile generated from the dispenser #3 excavation. Samples SP4 and SP5 were collected from the stockpiles generated from the hoists and T4 excavations, respectively. Sample SP6 was collected from the stockpile generated from the dispenser #1 and #2 excavations. U1367.TC1 101994F2 6 Stockpile samples were collected approximately 18 to 24 inches below the stockpile surface at randomly selected locations by forcing a brass tube firmly into the soil to minimize headspace. The samples were preserved and handled as outlined in Appendix B. Based upon laboratory analytical results that indicated stockpile samples contained TPPH concentrations from below detection limits to 12 mg/kg and no detectable benzene or TRPH concentrations, site excavations were backfilled with stockpiled soil with BFD approval. 5.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES/LABORATORY RESULTS Thirty soil samples were collected for analysis. Samples collected beneath former gasoline USTs and dispensers and from stockpiles generated from the excavation of gasoline USTs and dispensers were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPH) and for b;~nzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX). TPPH and BTEX analyses were conducted according to United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) methods 8015 and 8020, respectively. Samples collected beneath waste-oil tanks were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) according to USEPA method 418.1, lead according to USEPA method 7421, and halogenated volatile organics (HVO) according to USEPA method 8010. Samples collected beneath former automotive hoists and from stockpiles generated from the excavation of the hoists and T4 were analyzed for TRPH only. Analytical results are presented in Tables I through 5. Laboratory analytical reports, including chain-of-custody documents, are in Appendix C. 5.1 GASOLINE USTs Eight soil samples were collected in the gasoline UST excavation (Figure 2). According to laboratory reports, none of the samples contained detectable concentrations of TPPH or BTEX (Table 1). 5.2 WASTE-OIL USTs Two soil samples were collected beneath each waste-oil UST (Figure 2). Analytical results of samples collected beneath the tanks are in Tables 2 and 3. U1367.TC1 101994F2 7 Laboratory reports indicate that none of the samples collected beneath either T3 or T4 contained TRPH or HVO concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Soil samples SS5-6 and SS6-8 collected beneath T3 contained lead concentrations of 2.7 and 1.7 mg/kg, respectively. Soil samples T4-C-6 and T4-C-10 both contained a lead concentration of 1.3 mg/kg. 5.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES Two soil samples were collected beneath each former dispenser (Figure 2). Analytical results of samples collected beneath former dispensers are in Table 4. No samples were collected beneath former product lines. According to laboratory reports, sample SS1-6 collected beneath the northern dispenser of island #2 contained a total xylenes concentration 0.025 mg/kg, but did not contain detectable concentrations of TPPH, benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS2-8 did not contain TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detectiorl limits. Laboratory reports indicate that sample SS3-6, collected beneath the southem dispenser of island #2, contained a toluene concentration of 0.0080 mg/kg and a total xylenes concentration of 0.032. The sample did not contain detectable concentrations of TPPH, benzene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS4-8 did not contain TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Laboratory reports indicate that neither sample SS5-6 nor SS6-8, collected beneath the northern dispenser of island #1 (and T3), contained detectable TPPH or BTEX concentrations. According to laboratory reports, sample SS7-6 collected beneath the southern dispenser of island #1 contained a TPPH concentration of 4.9 mg/kg and a total xylenes concentration of 0.026 mg/kg. The sample did not contain detectable Concentrations of benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS8-8 did not contain TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Laboratory reports indicate that sample SS9-6, collected beneath the eastern dispenser~ of island #3, contained TPPH, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes concentrations of 45,000, 890, 480, and 4,200 mg/kg, respectively. The sample did not contain a detectable benzene concentration. Sample SS10-10 (collected four feet below SS9-6) contained TPPH, toluene, and total xylenes concentrations of 1.2, 0.022, and 0.0080 mg/kg, respectively. SS10-10 did not contain detectable concentrations of benzene or ethyl benzene. U1367.TC1 101994F2 8 Laboratory reports indicate that sample SS11-6, collected beneath the western dispenser of island #3, contained toluene and total xylenes concentrations of 0.0060 and 0.0080 rog/kg, respectively. The sample did not contain detectable concentrations of TPPH, benzene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS12-10 did not contain TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. 5.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS One soil sample was collected beneath each hoist. Laboratory results for the two samples are in Table 2. According to the laboratory report, neither sample contained a detectable TRPH concentration. 5.5 STOCKPILED SOIL Six soil stockpile samples were collec[ed. Laboratory results for the samples are in Table 5. Stockpile samples SP1 and SP3 were collected from stockpiles generated from. the gasoline USTs excavation. According to laboratory reports, sample SP1 did not contain TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Sample SP3 contained TPPH, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes concentrations of 12, 0.010, and 0.16 mg/kg, respectively. SP3 did not contain detectable concentrations of benzene or toluene. Sample SP2 was collected from the stockpile generated from the dispenser #3 excavation. Laboratory reports indicate the sample contained TPPH and total xylenes concentrations of 4.2 and 0.018 mg/kg, respectively. SP2 did not contain detectable benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene concentrations. Samples SP4 and SP5 were collected from the stockpiles generated from th~ hoists and T4 excavations, respectively. Laboratory reports indicate that neither SP4 nor SP5 contained detectable TRPH concentrations. Sample SP6 was collected from the stockpile generated from the dispenser #1 and #2 excavations. According to laboratory reports, SP6 contained a TPPH and total xylenes concentrations of 4.8 and 0.050 mg/kg, respectively. The sample did not contain detectable benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene concentrations. U1367.TC1 101994F2 9 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS GeoResearch conducted in-situ soil sampling beneath former USTs, dispensers, and hoists and collected stockpile characterization soil samples. Soil samples required by the BFD were collected beneath former UST, dispenser, and hoist locations at the direction a BFD representative. Soil samples were analyzed for constituents required by the BFD. 6.1 GASOLINE USTs Two gasoline USTs were removed from the site. Both tanks appeared to be in good condition and were without corrosion pitting or obvious holes. No soil discoloration was observed in the gasoline UST excavation. According to analytical results, none of the eight soil samples collected beneath the former gasoline tanks contained TPPH or BTEX concentrations above laboratory detection limits. Field observations and the laboratory analysis of confirmation samples indicate that soil beneath.the former gasoline USTs is not impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. 6.2 WASTE-OIL USTs Two waste-oil USTs were removed from the site. Waste-oil tank T3, formerly located under dispenser island #1, was partially crushed during removal of the island. The UST was rusted but no corrosion pitting or holes were observed on the bottom of the tank. No soil discoloration was observed in the waste-oil tank/dispenser island excavation. Analytical reports indicate that neither of the two soil samples collected beneath T3 contained TRPH or HVO concentrations above laboratory detection limits. The two soil samples collected beneath the tank contained lead concentrations of 2.7 and 1.7 mg/kg. Field observations and analytical results of samples collected beneath the tank do not indicate that spillage or leakage from T3 has impacted site soils. Approximately 5 cubic yards of soil which appeared to be lightly to moderately stained was observed adjacent to waste-oil tank T4 was excavated. T4 was rusted but no corrosion pitting or holes were observed on the tank. No soil discoloration was observed beneath the tank. Analytical reports indicate that neither of the two soil samples collected beneath T4 contained TRPH or HVO concentrations above laboratory detection limits. The soil sample collected from the stockpile generated from the T4 excavation did not contain TRPH above detection limits. Both soil samples collected beneath the tank contained lead concentrations of 1.3 rog/kg. Based upon field observations and the analytical results of samples collected beneath T4, site soils beneath the UST do not appear to have been impacted by spillage or leakage from the tank. U1367.TC1 101994F2 10 6.3 FUEL DISPENSERS AND PRODUCT LINES Soil samples were collected beneath each of the six former dispensers. Based upon the fact that samples collected from Phase II borings near product lines did not indicate the presence of petroJeum hydrocarbons and based upon the close proximity of product piping to the UST and dispenser island excavations, the BFD did not require soil sampling beneath product lines. Based upon an odor and OVA readings that indicated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons, approximately 25 cubic yards of sandy soil was excavated beneath dispenser island #2. No soil discoloration was observed beneath island #2. Analytical results indicate that sample SS1-6, collected beneath the northern dispenser of island #2, contained a total xylenes concentration 0.025 mg/kg, but did not contain detectable concentrations of TPPH, benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS3-6, collected beneath the southern dispenser, contained ~.. toluene concentration of 0.0080 mg/kg and a total xylenes concentration of 0.032. '.out did not contain detectable concentrations of TPPH, benzene, or ethyl benzene. Neither sample SS2-8 nor SS4-8 collected beneath the northern and southern dispensers, respectively, contained detectable TPPH or BTEX concentrations. Field observations and analytical results indicate that soils beneath dispenser #2 are not significantly affected by petroleum hydrocarbons. There were no field indications of petroleum hydrocarbons around/beneath island #1. Analytical reports indicate that neither of the samples collected beneath the northern dispenser of island #1 contained detectable TPPH or BTEX concentrations. Sample SS7- 6 collected beneath the southern dispenser of island #1 contained a TPPH concentration of 4.9 mg/kg and a total xylenes concentration of 0.026 mg/kg. The sample did not contain detectable concentrations of benzene, toluene, or ethyl benzene. Sample SS8-8 collected beneath the southern dispenser did not contain detectable TPPH or BTEX concentrations. Based upon field observations and analytical results, it does not appear that soils beneath dispenser #1 are significantly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons. Based upon an odor and OVA readings that indicated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons, approximately 35 cubic yards of soil was excavated beneath the eastern half of dispenser island #3. No soil discoloration was observed beneath dispenser island #3. Analytical results indicate that sample SS9-6, collected beneath the eastern dispenser of island #3, contained TPPH, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes concentrations of 45,000, 890, 480, and 4,200 mg/kg, respectively, but did not contain a detectable benzene concentration. Soil immediately around and beneath SS9-6 was excavated. Sample SS10-10, also collected beneath the eastern dispenser, contained TPPH, toluene, and total xylenes concentrations of 1.2, 0.022, and 0.0080 mg/kg, respectively, but did not contain detectable benzene or ethyl benzene concentrations. U1367.TC1 101994F2 1 1 Sample SS11-6, collected beneath the western dispenser of island #3, contained toluene and total xylenes concentrations of 0.0060 and 0.0080 mg/kg, respectively, but did not contain detectable TPPH, benzene, or ethyl benzene concentrations. Sample SS12-10 collected beneath the western dispenser did not contain detectable TPPH or BTEX concentrations. Field observations and analytical results indicate that soils beneath dispenser #3 are not significantly affected by petroleum hydrocarbons. 6.4 AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS No soil discoloration was observed in the excavations around/beneath the two former hoist locations. According to analytical results, neither sample collected beneath each hoist contained a detectable TRPH concentration. Field observations and analytical results of samples collected beneath the hoists do not indicate that leakage from the former hoists has' impacted site soils. 6.5 STOCKPILED SOIL Soil samples were collected to characterize soil stockpiles generated during the removal of station facilities and during soil sampling activities. Analytical reports indicate that stockpiled soil from beneath/around former USTs and dispensers contained TPPH concentrations ranging from 12 mg/kg to below laboratory detection limits. None of the stockpiled soil from beneath/around former USTs and dispensers contained benzene or toluene concentrations and reported ethyl benzene and total xylenes concentrations for some of those samples were only slightly above detection limits. Analytical results also indicate that stockpiled soil from beneath/around waste-oil USTs and hoists did not contain detectable TRPH concentrations. Based upon analytical results, stockpiled soil did not contain significant concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons and was utilized as backfill for site excavations. 7.0 RECOMMENDATION Based upon information from the Phase II investigation, field observations during the UST removals and soil sampling activities, and analytical results of soil samples collected beneath former station facilities and from stockpiled soil, no further action at this site is recommended. Closure of this former UST site by the BFD appears appropriate. U1367.TC1 101994F2 12 8.0 REFERENCES Hackel, Otto, 1966, Summary Of The Geology Of The Great Valley, Geology of Nodhern California, California Division of Mines Bulletin 190, Chapter 5, page 217 - 238. Kern County Water Agency, 1992, 1991 Report On Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4. PHR Environmental Consultants, Inc., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, July 30, 1993. United States Department of Interior, Geologic Survey, Gosford, California Quadrangle, 7.5 Series, 1954, Photorevised 1968 and 1973. U1367.TC1 101994F2 13 TABLE 1 RESULTS OF TPPH AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER GASOMNE USTs UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GEORESEARCH PROJECT NO. 9570600500 USEPA METHODS 8015/8020 (mg/kg) Sample Sample TPPH as Benzene Toluene Ethyl Total ID Date Gasoline Benzene Xylenes T1 -E-13 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T1-E-17 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T2-E-13 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T2-E-17 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T1 -W-13 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND 'I'1 -W-17 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T2-W-13 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND T2-W-17 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND DETECTION LIMIT 1.0 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 (mg/kg) NOTES: ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits TPPH = Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram U1367.TC1 101994F2 TABLE 2 RESULTS OF LEAD AND TRPH ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER WASTE-OIL USTs AND HOISTS UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GEORESEARCH PROJECT NO. 9570600500 USEPA METHOD USEPA METHOD 7421 418.1 Sample Sample ID Date Lead TRPH (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Samples collected beneath T3 (and island #1) SS5-6 8/9/94 2.7 ND SS6-8 8/9/94 1.7 ND Samples collected beneath T4 T4-C-6 8/9/94 1.3 ND T4-C-10 8/9/94 1.3 ND Samples collected beneath hoists SS13-10 8/9/94 na ND SS14-10 8/9/94 na ND DETECTION LIMIT 0.25 15 (mg/kg) NOTES: ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram na = not analyzed U1367.TC1 101994F2 TABLE 3 RESULTS OF HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER WASTE-OIL USTs ON 8/9/94 UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GEORESEARCH PROJECT NO. 9570600500 USEPA METHOD 8010 (ug/kg) Detection Analgte Limit Sample ID (,ug/Kg) "' T4-C-6 T4-C- 10 SS5-6 SS6-8 Bromodichloromethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND Bromoform 5.0 ND ND ND ND Bromomethane 10.0 ND ND ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 5.0 ND ND ND ND · Chlorobenzene 5.0 ND ND ND ND Chioroethane 10.0 ND ND ND ND 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 10.0 ND ND ND ND Chloroform 5.0 ND ND ND ND Chloromethane 10.0 ND ND ND ND Dibromochloromethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,1 -Dichloroethene 5.0 ND ND ND ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND ND ND ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 ND ND .ND ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 ND ND ND ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 ND ND ND ND Methylene chloride 50 ND ND ND ND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND Tetrachloroethene 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND Trichloroethene 5.0 ND ND ND ND Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 ND ND ND ND Vinyl Chloride 10.0 ND ND ND ND NOTES: ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram U1367.TC1 101994F2 TABLE 4 RESULTS OF TPPH AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BENEATH FORMER DISPENSERS UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GEORESEARCH PROJECT NO. 9570600500 USEPA METHODS 8015/8020 (mg/kg) Sample Sample TPPH as Benzene Toluene Ethyl Total ID Date Gasoline Benzene Xylenes SS1-6 8/9/94 ND ND I I',iD ND 0.025 i SS2-8 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND SS3-6 8/9/94 ND ND 0.0080 ND 0.032 SS4-8 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND SS5-6 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND SS6-8 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND SS7-6 8/9/94 4.9 ND ND ND 0.026 SS8-8 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND SS9-6 8/9/94 45,000 ND 890 480 4,200 SS10-10 8/9/94 1.2 ND 0.022 ND _ 0.051 SS11-6 8/9/94 ND ND 0.0060 ND 0.0080 SS12-10 8/9/94 ND ND ND ND ND DETECTION LIMIT 1.0 0.005' 0.005 0.005 0.005 (mg/kg) NOTES: ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits TPPH = Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rog/kg = milligrams per kilogram U1367.TC1 101994F2 TABLE 5 RESULTS OF TPPH, BTEX, AND TRPH ANALYSES OF SOIL STOCKPILE SAMPLES COLLECTED 8/9/94 UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 1367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GEORESEARCH PROJECT NO. 9570600500 USEPA METHODS 8015/8020/418.1 (mg/kg) Sample ID TPPH as Benzene Toluene Ethyl Total TRPH Gasoline Benzene Xylenes SP1 ND ND ND ND ND na SP2 4.2 ND ND ND 0.018 na SP3 12 ND ND 0.010 0.16 na SP4 na na na na na ND SP5 na na na na na ND SP6 4.8 ND ND ND 0.050 na DETECTION 1.0 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 15 LIMIT (mg/kg) NOTES: ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits TPPH = Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram na = not analyzed U1367.TC1 101994F2 Rad~o, T~.ve r ~ NORTH o ~/,* ~/2 ~ ~ I ' SITE LOCATION UNOCAl_ SERVICE STATION 1.367 1502 BRUNDAGE LANE REFERENCE: BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1954 PROJECT NO. 9570600500 GOSFORD, CALIFORNIA, OUADRANGLE, PHOTOREVISED, 1973 DATE: O9/25/941CKD BY: IFIGURE NO': i,'2, ffJ,,/~ FILE NO: SITE600500 v,~,..,,,.,,-- DRAWN BY: L. KOCHIAN PROPERTY BOUNDARY [ ~------1,~.~RFO R M ER TIRE ACE SHED I FORMER 550-GALLON. / WASTE-OIL "~ T'~4 FORMER TANK ~.~ x,j STATION BUILDING SBT1 T4-C-/'/6/JH A5 T4-C-10 HA4 SS13-10 HOISTS.,~ HA3 FORMER ~A~3~--~ SS1 4--10 DISPENSER J OSe,o ,SLAND #3 lSD6 ~.j k ? -, I <.5 SD2 I II SSll-6 550-GALLON ....... ..2 / r~Ld FORMER ~_ s83 SS12-? FORMER CANOPY ~. T~NK i1!; v/i o ii o il ~ Ill I\I I D,SPENSER ~d }:~x :', ~ i I I', 1t~ss9-6' I z ~ <~.<-~II,'~T2-W-13 ~ ~T1-W-13 P \ "..-JJSSlO-lO I rY ISLAND #~ SB4C ~...._~HA2I: IJ1T2-W-17 lJ Tl-W-17 ~_ L.~ j j m SS7-6/ ~1111 ' T2 ,,T1 l/ SS8-8 SS5-6,~ ~ [ I ~ s~7 Fo??E*_.¢~I;,,i f,.. ,,_ ,/ SS6-8 JJ PRODUCT'%L~ !; ~ ! '~ It ~. I ! FORMER j~J LINES- I'd.i ~; /...JJ .'%.I / DISPENSER r~l I sD5 ~T2-E-17 .~ I I~ ~FORMER SS4-sSS'3-6 L~-=..-2.,,..~.~ SsSS~i68/ J~1 OSB9 GASOLINE USTs SIDEWALK OHESTER AVENUE LEGEND X SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION NORTH sB'O HOLLOW-STEM AUGER BORING LOCATION (~ G R h (*REV, GUS ,NVEST,OAT, ON~ e O e S e O F C 0 10 20 .4-0 HA~A HAND AUGER BORING LOCATION ~ ' ~ SITE PLAN AND SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS (PREVIOUS iNVESTIGATION) SCALE IN FEET UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. '1.367 --> SOIL BORING DEVIATED FROM VERTICAL 1502 BRUNDAOE LANE BAKERSFIELD. CAUFORNIA ~ EXCAVATION AREA PROJECT NO. g570600500 ii FILE NO: 600500 DRAWN BY: . KOCHIAN APPENDIX A U1367.TC1 101994F2 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE'TANK SITE INFORMATIO~ ' TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~. ~~~.. ~HoNE CONTRACTOR ~ANK CLEANIN_G INFORMATION .. . WASTE TRANSPORtER'IDENTIFICATiON-NUMBER TAN~,o. A~ VOtU~E CHEf,CAt OA~S C,~MlCAt STO~D STO~D P~WOUS~Y Sm~ED A~Roq'ED~- ' APPLICA~ThAME (PRINB ]Northern Ro$1onal Office { ]Central RegtonoJ Office ~o~t, herrt ~onal Of ftc( 4230 Kiorn~ Ave, S~. 180 19~ ~olumne St. ~ ~7~ "M" S~, Suite 275' M~es~, CA 95~6 Fresno, CA 98721 Bakersfield, CA 93~I (209) ~45-7~ (2~) 497.1~0 (~5) 861-8~2 (San louqui., S[alslaus and Mcr~d C°undcO (Fresno. Mud~ and ~ngm Counties) ' - ~u{~e and Kc~ DEMOLITION PERMIT RELEASE pem~ until the applicant ham demo~trated compli~ce ~th or has ~en ce~fl~d exempt ~om the Emission Standards for Haz~dou~ ~ Pollutan~ ~ESHAP) notification requ~ement. ~ approv~ si~a~re must ~ obtained, on ~is fo~, ~om the San Joaquiu V~Iey U~fied ~ Pollution Control Dts~ict, It Is the Applicant's rosponsiblllW to obtain the required signature and return this form to the appropriate city or coun~ building dopadment. ' ' Project Oesc[Iption I, Facility being demolished Y N 2. ~posed proj~t Y N with fo~ or lower u~s.~ Sub~vlsi~ O~her (describe): S~p//~ ~ _~. ~,.e. ~blic ~oject (Sch~L Hilhway) 9 [ ...... ' '' ........ --' :: .... I ~ ~ I FOB ,SJVUAPCD~: uS~- ONLy ................. "::":': ::": "' ~ ,,This,certi,,fi~s th. at the de/nolition_~ppl/c~t~hj~, e~tisfied the APOD~ requirement.,. The APCD allows rne aemoJirion to proceea on or ~ft.er. '~ J ~_./~, ...... 199_._~.. { ] 'l~s certifies that the Demolition application is exempt from the APCD's requirements. For l{ober~ d. Kard, Director of Compliance, San Joaquin Vat]ey Unified Pollution Control District _~ ..... DO NOT WRi~ BELOW TNIS DTSC 80g:2A (12/';U] White, TSDF SfNDS THIS COf'Y TO DT$C WITHIN 30 DAYS EPA 8!00~'2 To, P.O. Box 3000, So<ram~nto, CA 95812 ~ . . .: ~..~'.,. · ' .: ' ' .~" BAKERSFIELD .FIRE DEPART~ZNT HAZARDOUS 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93101 (805) 326~397~ CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TA~K DECONTAMINATION Address · - cleaned/d~con=aminat~d pro~erly and a ~EL (lower explosive limit) reading o~ no greater ~han 5% was measured i~ta~ely follow~ng the cleaning/decontamination process. Confo~a=ion by= i~ GOLDEN SIATE METALS, INC. .... ; " C': ? Ph0n~ (805} ~27-3559 · ~ax (805) ~27.5749 ' Con.actor's ~rap Metals. Pro~s~g A Re.cling License No. . ....... _ ContractOr's .... DES~NA~ON: G. g, M. · ~000 E. ~RUNDAOE ~N~, BAKERSRELD, CA 93387 LEL READING ~oo 2.42 . XYGEN CONTENT ~ 7~o~ ~.~ DISPOSAL FEE ' ~" ......... ~ .......... TOTAL Alt fees Incurred are per load unless specified. Terms are net 30 daye from receipt of t~nk, ~ntractor'~ signature repre~ent~ acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms that tank ramova] complies with ~tate laws. ,, ,",.. COt;TRACTOR'~ SIGNATURE :[:""::: ~ · ,',;.. : r- 2:,~: CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION TH~S ~s TO CERtifY THE R~CEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIEO ABOVE ALL MATER(AL ~P~G[FtED WiLL BE COMPS,RTE, O~ST~OYEO FO~P ~L{NG P~POS~$ ONLY. ~ ~ ~,~W ~7-"~:'} ~ ~ ' - '~ ' ' .......... 1716 OAK STREET, UNIT8 EAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 · (805) 323-4844 , 325-9076 SEPTEMBER 2,199q JoB No. §4-H- 'WEGENER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY I710 CALLOWAY DRIVE .BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 95312 ATTN: MR. DOUG WEGENER RE: SOILS COMPACTION CERTIFICATION FOR BACKFILL IN PITS OF FORMER UNOCAL SERVICE STATION #1~67 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF So. CHESTER AVE. A~D BRUNDAGE LANE GENTLEMEN~ THE UNDERSIGNED TESTED THE ~OIL DURING THE BACKFILLING OF PITS CREATED BECAUSE OF THE REMOVAL OF FUEL TANKS, OIL TANKS AND AUTO LIFT DEVICES. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL WAS FROM ON-SITE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AND ALSO FROM IMPORTED MATERIAL. ALL OF THE SOIL MATERIAL PLACED INTO THE EXCAVATED PETS WAS MECHANICALLY COMPACTED, UTILIZING MOISTURE AS REQUIRED,' UNTIL'THE ' RELATIVE COMPACTION MET OR EXCEEDED 90~ OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY. MAXIMUM DENSITY WAS DETERMINED BY FOLLOWING THE ASTM SPECIFICATION D~1557-78, METHOD A, MODIFI'ED AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 70 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. " ATTACHED IS A LIST OF THE FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS. WHEN A DENSITY TEST FAILED, THE CONTRACTOR WAS INFORMED AND INSTRUCTED TO REMOVE THE STRATA AND ALL THE STRATA PLACED A~OVE THE FAILED STRATA. THE CONTRACTOR THEN PROCEEDED TO REWORK THE MATERIAL REMOVED, THEN REPLACE IT IN 8# LIFTS AND COMPACT SAID LOOSE MATERIAL UNTIL THE REQUIRED DENSITY WAS ATTAINED. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE UNDERSIGNED THAT THE SOIL AS PLACED IN THE PITS AT THIS SITE WILL CARRY ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE LOAD IMPOSED BY A ONE STORY BUILDING. YOURS TRULY, /'~SMITH & ASSOCIATES, A DBA OF ~PRESIDENT HCE:PJ ENCLOSURE ~O]k TESTS AT EXCAVATION ..SITES OF 6AS.TANKS, HYOBAUL..~.C.LIFT_$_&,.WAST~__DIL_TANKS_REM~VED ..... FROM. UNOCAL'~TATION N6~'~7 LOCATED IN' BAKERSFIEbD,,CAL~,r~NIA_AT TH~._~OUT?ESTE, CORN~R ' ,~-~-01.,..IUNDAGE.LANDE:,.'AN~-~OUTH CHESTE~._,ENUEi?~,~?~;~?~!~:?]%?,?..'~,',,. DATE TEST DEPTH LOCATION PERCENT INPLACE ~AX. DRY RELATIVE NO. BELOW MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY COMPACTION GROUND (90% HINI~UM ,~URFACE '- REOUIREP) ~2i9/94~ -"-1 6.0' ...... GAS TANK '7;9' 1i8.7 i21.0 '98;1 HOLE 8/19/94 2 7.0' GAs TANK 7.5 l~?.8 12~.0 95.2 HOLE MID 8/19/94 5 5.0' GAS TANK ~.9 ~8.8 ~1.0 98,2 HOLE MID 8/19/94 4 ~.0' GAS TANK q.? 12~.9 1~1,0 102,q HOLE 8/19/94 5 q.0' GAS TANK 8.0 114,6 1Z1.0 94.7 HOLE NID 8/19/94 6 2.0' GAS TANK 5.5 121.5 121.0 100,5 HOLE MID 8/19/94 7 1,0' GAS TANK 5,2 121.0 121.0 100.0 HOLE M!D gl~O/9q g F.G. GAs TANZ 5,7 ~16,$ 1~6,5 92.5 HOLE 8/50/94 9 F.G. GAS TANK 5,2 117,1. 126.~ 92,7 HOLE MID $/50/94 10 ~.0' EAST GAS 7,1 108.5 126.5 85,9~ ISLAND NID 8/~0/94 11~ 5.0' EAST GAS 5.6 ].17.q 126.5 9~.0 ISLAND HID RETEST 8/50/94 12 5.5' EAST GAs 2.0 1t5.8 126~5 91.7 iSLAND NIP 8/~0/94 1~ 5.2' EAST GAS 1,0 ]16.8 126.5 92,5 ISLAND 8/~0/94 lq F,G. EAST GAS q.2 l]9,! 126.5 94.5 .-ISLAND ~/~0/9~ 15 ~.0' GARAGE LIFT ~,~ 1]5,7 126.5 91.6 HOLE MID ~/~0/94 16* 2.0. 5ARAGE LIFT [1.1 1.09.~ 1~6,~ 86.7 HOLE MID 8/50/94 17 Z.0. GArAgE LIF~ q.9 117.0 1~6.5 9~.7 HOLE MID ~/~0/94 18 1,0' GARA6E LIFT ~,~ l]6,~ 176.~ 92.5 HOLE NID 8/30/94 19 F.G. GARAGE LIFT 4.6 ll, 6.6 126,3 HOLE MID 8/30/94 20 3.0' WASTE O~L TANK 3.2 119.2 126.3 94.4 WEST, 8/30/94 2]. 2.0' WASTE OIL TANK q.6 112.~ 126.3 88.9' WEST MID 8/30/94 22 2.0 WASTE OIL TANK ~.q ~]5.q 126.3 91.4 WEST~ MID 8/30/94 23 1.0' WASTE OIL TANK 3.q l~l.q 126.3 96.1 WEST, MID 8/30/94 24 F.G. WASTE OIL TANK 3.7 t19,0 126.3 94,3 WEST, MID FA]LED DENSITY TEST, RETEST MADE IN SUCCEEDING TEST APPENDIX B U1367.TC1 101994F2 PROCEDURES FOR GEORESEARCH SOIL SAMPLING NEAR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND IN SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS The following paragraphs describe the GeoResearch procedures for the collection of soil samples: 1. Soil samples shall be collected under the direction of a professional engineer, geologist, or authorized representative of a State-of-California certified laboratory. Sample numbers and locations shall be approved by the city/county inspector, if present onsite. 2. All soil samples at tank removal sites and/or shallow excavations shall be taken from the backhoe/excavator bucket unless the excavation has been safely graded or shored. Soil samples will be collected from the interior portions of the backhoe/excavator bucket, away from the bucket's edges and teeth, to avoid potential cross-contamination. Approximately 1 inch of soil shall be removed from the surface area where the sample is to be collected and a clean, 6-inch-long, 1-inch-minimum-diameter brass ring will be pounded into the soil using a wooden mallet or equivalent tool. No headspace shall be present in the ring once the sample is collected. 3. In shallow excavations, as in beneath product lines, soil samples may be collected by driving a brass tube directly into the trench sidewall or excavation bottom or sidewall. 4. Soil samples shall be collected in thin-walled stainless-steel or brass cylinders 6 inches long by 1.5 inches or 2 inches in diameter. Cylinders shall be pounded into the soil with a wooden mallet or equivalent method when not using an auger or drilling equipment. 5. Each end of the cylinder shall be covered with aluminum foil, capped with' polyethylene lids, taped, and labeled. 6. Samples shall be transported in an ice chest containing blue ice or equivalent medium and kept at approximately 4 degrees centigrade until delivery to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) approved laboratory. 7. Chain-of-custody records produced in accordance with USEPA requirements shall be kept to track the possession of a sample from the time it is collected in the field until the time it is analyzed. U1367.TC1 101994F2 APPENDIX C U1367.TC1 101994F2 3euuo~a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 3640600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-OIO0 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 :.=-"~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T1-E-13 Received: 08/11/94 ~i~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 iii Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 iii Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogmm Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 88 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOI / L/YTICAL - ELAP #1210 Project Maffager Page: 7 oeuuo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) '64-9600 FAX(415) :364-92,, 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 AnaI,Tt-,ca/. 819 Striker Avenue, Suite $ Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T1-E-17 Received: 08/11/94 .:~'~-" Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 :..-~'-'-"~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogmm Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 85 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 Page: 8 oeuuota 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City', Cm 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX(415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 An~Ivt~c~I819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(g,6) 921-OIO0 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T2-E-13 Received: 08/11/94.......:~-" Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~m"..`~.`:.~'.?.~.~.'..~...~.r~.~.."..'".'~.~:.'.~::~...`..~.~`~....~...~:~:::...:""-~.~.~.~.~.~"'~";"~`~.~""~ ......... .~-..~.~....:_..:...~ ............ ~......~.~-?~ ............... ... ........ ...,......?..~~.;.:~..-~-?~..~..............:.=:,~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 88 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 A~rea F~'lcher- Project Manager Page: 9 oeuuo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 8lg Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(g16) 921-0100 iii Gee Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 :-......"~ ~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: 12-E-17 Received: 08/11/94 ~..-...-:-:." i~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOUD Extracted: 08/15/94 ~4 :~.:'.'~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ..~."~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene .70 130 88 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. ~O~~ANALY'rlCAL El_AP #1210 PrOject Manager Page: 10 oeuuo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood C,ty, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bat~s Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 ($10) 686-9600 FAX ($10) 686-9689 Analytical ,,Strikc, Avenue. Su,te8 Sac,amcnto. C^ 95834 9,6) ill Geo Research Client ProI. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ill iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T1 -W-13 Received: 08/11/94 ....=~ iii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ~ :'L: ..?..""-" Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 w..~'"~ iii_ A.. _t!..e..n..t.!9..n..;.....W_.a.r.r.e..n_~.G...r.9.s.s_ ........................................ ~.b...N.u. _m..b...e..r_:_9_ ~.~9.9_.~ .~. .................................................................................. .R..e. pg..r!.e...d..L.0_..8./J....SZ~.94__....jl. Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Umit Sample Results mo/Kg mo/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % RecoVery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 85 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 .~cher Project ~anager Page: 3 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ^nalyucal ,,9$~r,~er^ven~e,$u,e~ Sacramento, CA 95834 (9,6) 921-9600 FAX(9,6) 92,-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 [[[ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T1 -W-17 Received: 08/11/94 ~[i Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ~i Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ii"-..." ~:....~....A......"..~.n..~!...~..~;....w....~..r..r.~.~."~..r"~...-..s.&~..~-..~...:...?~...:.......~:~-.:.~.~.~::.:~`~-~..~."~..e...r.~.....~..6....9..?..~..~.""--~.~...~....~.~..... ..... ~-.:?~..- .......... .-.. ..... .._~..............._...._~.?_..e.~_o...~¢..~._o..~.~,~%............~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg rog/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 92 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - El_AP #1210 Project"Manager Page: 4 oeuuo.a ~,oc~.a.~a,~O.,v~ ~dwooa C,,., CA ,4,5~ ,~4-9~00 ~AX,4,5),~4-9~. 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical .,gStr, ker^venue.$u.e8 Sacramento. C^ 95~34 ~,6~ 92,-9600 FAX(~,6~9~,-0,00 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 .:~'-'-"-" 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Doscript: T2-W-13 Received: 08/11/94 ~ii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ili Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Umits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 87 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 Project Manager Page: 5 oeuuoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City. CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (413)364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819$,rikerAvenue,$uite8 Sacramento, CA 958,4 (916) 92,-9600 FAX (916, 92,-0100 Gee Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 .: =. .:." ~ -" 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T2-W-17 Received: 08/11/94 i~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ~i Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 iil Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-04 R..e.p..orted: 0.8.]..1..8J_94 ~ii Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 100 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ~T~CAL- ELAP #1210 Project Manager Page: 6 oeuuo~a 680Ch~a.eakeorive RedwoodCi.. (4,5, 364-9600 FAX (4,$) 364-92. 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 8,gStr,kerAvenue. Su,t¢8 Sacramento. CA ~8~4 (9,6) 92,-9600 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS1-6 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 i.-_.": Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-09 Rep..orted: 0.8.Z.l~J..94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.025 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C8-C12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 80 Analytes reported as N.Do were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA. ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 An ea r-ulcher ' Project Manager Page: 11 3euuoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364~9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS2-8 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-10 R..e.p..orted: 0..8J..1.8_./.94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 83 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection, SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 Andrea~ulcher Project Manager Page: 12 aeuuoia 680 Che,apeake Dr, ve Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (4,5)364-9~.33 1900 §ares Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 ($10) 686-9600 FAX ($10) 686-9659 Analytical 8,9 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (9,6) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 i~ Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 i}} i~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS3-~ Receivod: 08/11/94 iii ~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ..-~i .:~....=-"~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~i Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Emit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.0080 Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.032 Chromatogram Pattern: ........................................ gas Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 86 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA_ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210 ~ndrea ~ulcher Project Manager Page: 13 3euuota 6,0 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, (415) 364-9600 FAX (415> 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 /Xnaivt,caI 819 Striker Avenue, Suite $ Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 F~ (916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS4-8 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94:~....?' Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ill Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-12 R..e.p..orted: 0..8./..1..8/..94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) · 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % %. Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 87 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA AN~Y'rlCAL ELAP #1210 AnOr~a~u~cher Project Manager Page: 14 aeuuo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-923:3 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 i~ Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 i~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS5-6 Received: 08/11/94 ~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94...:,i.2 i~i Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~ Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-13 R..e.p. orted: 0_8J_1 _8.].94 -'. '~" =-" m.2~.2t i :. ':i.2 i ,,,i''' ''': i .".2 .2 i i ,,, .t i E ': .2 'ii i i: ,,,i'; i i i: :i .'2 .": :..2 '.'!.' ." iii ,,,ii lt.'il i iL"ii i1."1i i: i i i" Fi:::: i ."ig: ii: i "-" :.2 ,,, ." ~ ."-11 i iii i .: ~ i ~ i il .2 i i i .": ,,, Z ''' m ." m .2 i i:. .::. i i .~ .2:. .2 i :. .2 .2 :. .21'~ :. ':i :. '~.2 i .2: i: i m i il.2 iii" ." .2 m; i i i: .2i i '~i: ! ." i i i i i.2 :.: i i i i .2 i ." i i! :. i ~ i :. :. i i ." il i-2 i ."!! }: i :. i i i .2 i ." i .= ." i i .'-.' Z i i.2 .2! FZ.2!i i .2i ." i i .: ii'.'!." iii i :FF. "-" ~ i i i i i .-' ." .-' .-' :' .2 .2 Z i i ." ." .2 g .": .2!."i F i i i ." ~1." i Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg rog/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 91 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA A LYTICAL - El_AP #1210 Project Manager Page: 16 oeuuoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Ave.ue, S.i,e8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS6~8 Received: 08/11/94 ~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ...~...~' Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ii~ ..A...~..e...n...t.!...q..n...'_....W_a_..r..r...e...n..._.G...r...o...s....s. ...... ~...b...._N_.u._..m....b....e...r.: .9._.4....0....8..~:.!..4.. .......................................................................................... ...R._e.p..._o....n....e...d...;...0....8.Z!..sx~_ ...... Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. ylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. hromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 77 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210 Project Manager Page: 18 oequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364:9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Str ker Avenue. Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ~i 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS7~ Received: 08/11/94 ~ Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 iil Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 .:iiii.: Attention Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-15 R..e~orted: 0.8_~_1..8~94 ~ .: ." L~!.' .: .= .: .: ii :~:'!.: ~ ii~ ii ii~.: .:ii .: .: .: .: .: ii ~ .: .: ii: .: .: .: ~ .: .: iii .: .: ii .: ii .:ii ii ii .: i .: .: ii .: .: ii i ii .: iii.: .: .: i: .: .: .:iii.: .: .: .: .: ii .: .:: .: iiiiii .: .: .: ~ .:ii: .:ii i i i .: i .: .: .: ii :?..:i ~ ii ii .: ..' .: ii lii .: .: ii ii :' .:: .: .:: ii .: .: iii .: .:: .:: .: .: .: .: .'+ii .: ii~ .: ii~i .:ii .: .: .: ii .: .: .: iiii .:='~ .: .: .: .: .: .: iii ~iF.'~ii.: .: .:ii .: .: .: .: .: .:i~ .u...:ii .: .: .: .:: .: .: ..'i iii .:ii ':iii .= .: ii .: .: .: .: ii~.: .: .: .: .: .: .: .: ii .: .: .: .: ii .: .: .: .: .:~ .: .u..:,: .1 .:~ ..-.. =. ii.: .: .: .: .: .: .: .: .: ii iiii .: .: ii:: ~ ii .: .: .::: .: .: .: .: ~ ii .: .: .: ii .: ii .: :. [~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 1.0 .................... 4.9 Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.026 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C9-C 12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 89 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA~I)IALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 A.~.~ F~i~her Pr~j~ect Manager Page: 19 oequo,a 68o Chesa.eake D ive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415)364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 8,, Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 F~(916) 92,-0100 iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS8-8 Received: 08/11/94 ~... ~i Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ill .::_..'=~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ......... il Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-16 R..e.p..orted: 0..8./..1 ..8./..94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 89 Analytes reported as N.D, were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA~,N~LY~ICAL - ELAP #1210 Anorea Fulcher Project Manager Page: 20 oet uo.a680Che,a.eakeD..e "edwoodCit,, ,64-9600 (4,5, ,64-92,, 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Ana yucm 819 Striker Avenue, $ui,e 8 Sacramento, CA 958,4 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ~.:.:-'--": 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS9~ Received: 08/11/94 gl Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ,~-"-"-" Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 iii Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-19 R.o~orted: 0.8.~18_~94 ~ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg rog/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 2500 .................... 45000 Benzene 12 N.D. Toluene .................... 12 .................... 890 Ethyl Benzene .................... 12 .................... 480 Xylenes (Total) .................... 12, .................... 4200 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C7-C12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 89 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 AnC'~c~ ~'~ch e r Pr~Sject Manager Page: 23 oequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX {415) 364-9233 1900 Bats Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ~_nalyucal 8,gS,r,kcrAvenue. Su,te8 Sacramen,o.C^ 9.34 (9,6) 92,-9600 ~X~9,6~92,-0,00 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ill 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS10-10 Received: 08/11/94 iii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 "':~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 -=-": Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-20 R..e.p. orted: 0..8./..1..8./..94 i{ Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 1.0 .................... 1.2 Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene .................... 0.0050 .................. ~-. 0.022 Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.051 Chromatogram Pattern: ........................................ gas Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifiuorotoluene 70 130 94 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA/.A, NALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 Project Manager Page: 24 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ^na yucm 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 ~i Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SSll-6 Received: 08/11/94 iii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 iil Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~ Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-21 R..e.p...orted: 0..8]..1..8]..94 -'.."ii .:ii i: i i iii ."iiiii!i." '.-i .= ." .: i i i iii ik' '.' ii ll .-' i i ~-i =W.-! '.-! m .-' ~ ii llll iiii!~ i i ."ii g i ~: i ~ i ! ." :' ." :' i :' i .=iE i i ii! .: i ii i i ii ii =' iii ."iii i i ii .: ~ ii.: .: .: iii ." ".ii i:-.' iii iii .-."ii. i i i ii." ::.ii: i { i i ~ i ~ ." i Z ". !iiiiii.--.' i i i ii i i i i i i i ii i~ ii ! .-' ~ i .=-.' i-: Z ii i k~" i :' :'~ ~ .-' .-' iii ii .: i i ii i k.i i iii i m =-"-i i ii i-" ii:: E b.' .-' .-'-~-'~ ii.: i ! i ~ '~ i i i: ~ ii i ." iii i i .-'ii Z } .: iii l.= i ".!iiii.k.'il i .: ii} ii. i i ~i m i}i 11 .= i i i i i: :' ': ii .: ii ." :~ i Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TpPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg ' TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.0060 Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.0080 Chromatogram Pattern: ........................................ gas Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 83 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA/A~NALY'I'ICAL - ELAP #1210 rea ulcner Pro~ ec~M~nager Page: 25 oeHuo a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ^na yuca Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 92,-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: S812-10 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 _A...~...e...n..tion: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-22 R..e.p...orted: 0..8.J..1 _8.J..94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 85 Analytes reported as N.D, were not present above the stated limit of detection. S~CA~~L - ELAP #1210 Andrea ~ulcher Project Manager Page: 26 oe~4uota 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819$trikerAvenue,$uite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 Gee Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Received: 08/11/94 ill Fresno, CA Lab Proj. ID: 9408699 Analyzed: see below .=~:-"-:: Attention: Warren Gross R..e~orted: 0.8./..1 ..8./..94 LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analyte Units Date Detection Sample Analyzed Limit Results Lab No: 9408699-13 Sample Desc' SOLID,SS5-6 Lead mg/Kg 08/15/94 0.25 2.7 TRPH (EPA 418.1) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-14 Sample Desc- SOLID,SS6-8 Lead mg/Kg 08/15/94 0.25 1.7 TRPH (EPA 418.1) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-17 Sample Desc' SOLID,T4-C-6 Lead mg/Kg 08/15/94 0.25 1.3 TRPH (EPA 418.1) rog/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-18 - Sample Desc' SOUD,T4-C-IO Lead mg/Kg 08/15/94 0.25 1.3 TRPH (EPA 418.1) rog/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-23 Sample Desc · SOLID,SS13-10 TR PH (EPA 418.1 ) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-24 Sample Desc' SOLID,SS14-10 TRPH (EPA 418.1 ) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQU~IA--ANALYTICAL - El_AP #1210 Project Manager Page: 1 Secluoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (4i5) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 I 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ,nahTtical8 ,9 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (9,6) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T4-C-fi Received: 08/11/94 Ri Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID i~i Analysis Method: EPA 8010 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ..-..-~-"-"-" Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-17 R_e.p...orted: 0..8J..1.8_/94 111 Halogenated Volatile Organics (EPA 8010) Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Bromodichloromethane 5.0 N.D. Bromoform 5.0 N.D. Bromomethane 10 N.D. Carbon Tetrachloride 5.0 N.D. Chlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. Chloroethane 10 N.D. 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 10 N.D. Chloroform 5.0 N.D. Chloromethane 10 N.D. Dibromochloromethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,1 -Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 N.D. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene . 5.0 N.D. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 N.D. Methylene chloride 50 N.D. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 N.D. Tetrachloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. Trichloroethene 5.0 N.D. Trichlorofl uoromethane 5.0 N.D. Vinyl chloride 10 N.D. Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene 60 130 87 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA A~IAI~Y'I'ICAL - El_AP #1210 ProjecfManager Page: 21 aeuuo~a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 /XnalvtJcal 819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: T4-C-10 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID ' Analysis Method: EPA 8010 Analyzed: 08/15/94 Attent on: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-18 R.e.p..,orted: 0_8.].1..8~94 Halogenated Volatile Organics (EPA 8010) Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Br0modichloromethane 5.0 N.D. Bromoform 5.0 N.D. Bromomethane 10 N.D. Carbon Tetrachloride 5.0 N.D. Chlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. Chloroethane 10 N.D. 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 10 N.D. Chloroform 5.0 N.D. Chloromethane 10 N.D. Dibromochloromethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 N.D. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .~ 5.0 N.D. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 N.D. Methylene chloride 50 N.D. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 N.D. Tetrachloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. Trichloroethene 5.0 N.D. Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 N.D. Vinyl chloride 10 N.D. Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene 60 130 95 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 ~j re~~; re r Page: 22 oeuuo a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0,00 ii~ Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ill 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS5-6 Received: 08/11/94 iii Fresno, CA Matdx: SOLID ~':':~ Analysis Method: EPA 8010 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~i Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-13 R..ep...orted: 0..8.]..1..8.]..94 Halogenated Volatile Organics (EPA 8010) Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results ug/Kg ug/Kg Bromodichloromethane 5.0 N.D. Bromoform 5.0 N.D. Bromomethane 10 N.D. Carbon Tetrachloride 5.0 N.D. Chlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. Chioroethane 10 N.D. 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 10 N.D. Chloroform 5.0 N.D. Chloromethane 10 N.D. Dibromochloromethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 N.D. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 N.D. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 N.D. Methylene chloride 50 N.D. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 N.D. Tetrachloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. Trichloroethene 5.0 N.D. Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 N.D. Vinyl chloride 10 N.D. Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene 60 130 83 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210 Andrea FJ~ccher Project Manager Page: 15 3euuo.a 680Che~apeakeDr,ve ~edwoodC*,y, CA ~4,5, 364-9600 F~(4,5) 364-92. 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ~nal..t~c~l ~,gS,r,~erAven~e,$u,,¢8 S~cr~men,o, CA 9~8~4 (9,6) ~2,_9600 ~(9,6)~,.0,00 iii Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ~i 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SS6-8 Received: 08/11/94 ili Fresno, CA Matrix: SCUD .=~'-'~ Analysis Method: EPA 8010 Analyzed: 08/15/94 Attention: Warren Gross Lab Number: 9408699-14 R..e.p_orted: 0..8J..1..8~94 Halogenated Volatile Organics (EPA 8010) Analyte Detection Emit Sample Results ag/Kg ag/Kg Bromodichloromethane 5.0 N.D. Bromoform 5.0 N.D. Bromomethane 10 N.D. Carbon Tetrachloride 5.0 N.D. Chlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. Chloroethane 10 N.D. 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether 10 N.D. Chloroform 5.0 N.D. Chloromethane 10 N.D. Dibromochloromethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,3oDichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,4oDichlorobenzene 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 N.D. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. 5.0 N.D. trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 5.0 N.D. Methylene chloride 50 N.D. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 N.D. Tetrachloroethene 5.0 N.D. 1,1, l-Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.0 N.D. Trichloroethene 5.0 N.D. Trichlorofluoromethane 5.0 N.D. Vinyl chlodde 10 N.D. Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene 60 130 88 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL El_AP #1210 Andrea Fu~c/her Project Manager Page: 17 oequo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 3640600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, guite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (9,6) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SP1 Received: 08/11/94 Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D. Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D. Chromatogmm Pattern: Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifl uorotoluene 70 130 105 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA~NALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 ' lc er Pr6j~Ct Manager Page: 27 oeuuo,a 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 '"?_4 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SP2 Received: 08/11/94 ...~.} Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 iiL..A....t!...e._.n._t.[..o....q.;.....W_a...r...r..e....n..._G..r_.o....s...,s. ................ ~_b.....N...u_m...b....e...r.;....~.0..~.9._9.:..2...6. .............................................................................................. ..R.....e.P....o.....rt.~.:....0..S_J.!..8./..~ .......... iii Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 1.0 .................... 4.2 Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.018 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C9-C12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 104 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 rbj~ct Manager Page: 28 aeuuota 600 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415)364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analytical 8,,$trikerAvenue,$uite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 92,-9600 FAX(',6) 921-0100 [[i Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 iil i~ 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SP3 Received: 08/11/94 ...:....~-"-" iii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 iil ~:-"~ Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 ~."~ !!...A.~ .e=nti:gn: War..r.e.n Gross ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................. . ..................................................................... ~..b.._~..u...m....b....e.r..:....~...8...6.~.:..2....7.. ........................................................................................... ...R....e.p.....o...n_.~.;.._0...82..LS/...9...4.. ...... Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH)with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 1.0 .................... 12 Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene .................... 0,0050 .................... 0,010 Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.16 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C9-C12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 108 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210 ~ge:~A ~~er Page: 29 . oequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 3640600 FAX (415) 364-92233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 Analyucm 8,9StrikerAvenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(9,6) 921-0100 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Received: 08/11/94 ,~ Fresno, CA Lab Proj. ID: 9408699 Analyzed: see below :..-'---: Attention: Warren Gross R_e.p. orted: 0..8._/..1..8.].94 ~ LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analyte U nits Date Detection Sa mple Analyzed Umit Results Lab No: 9408699-28 Sample Desc: SOLID,SP4 TRPH (EPA 418.1) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Lab No: 9408699-29 , Sample Desc: SOUD,SP5 TRPH (EPA 418.1) mg/Kg 08/16/94 15 N.D. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - El_AP #1210 Project Manager Page: 2 oe,4uola 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 ZnalyUcal 8,gS ri r^ve. e,S i e Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100 iii Geo Research Client Proj. ID: Unocal 1367 Sampled: 08/09/94 ill iii 1713 Tulare Suite 113 Sample Descript: SP6 Received: 08/11/94 ..."~ iii Fresno, CA Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/15/94 ~.~-"-=-= ~.:~': Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/15/94 .....-...~':'-' Attention: Warren Gross ~ Lab Number: 9408699-30 R..e.p..orted: 0_8J..1_8~94 Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results mg/Kg mg/Kg TPPH as Gas .................... 1.0 .................... 4.8 Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Toluene 0.0050 N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.0050 .................... 0.050 Chromatogram Pattern: Weathered Gas ........................................ C9-C12 Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery Trifluorotoluene 70 130 101 Analytes reported as N,D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210 ~r~ · Project Manager Page: 30 O 680 Chesapeake Drive · ReOwood City, CA 94063 · (415) 364-9600 Q 18939 120th Ave,, N.E., Suite 101 · Bothell, WA 98011 · (206) 481-9200 UNOCAL~ Q 819 Striker Ave., Suite 8. Sacrarnento, CA 95834 · (916) 921-9600 Q East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B · Spokane, WA 99206 · (509) 924-9200' Q 1900 Bates Ave., Suite LM . Concord, CA 94520. (510)686-9600 Q 15055S.W. SequoiaPkwy, Suite 110-Poland, OR 972~Z2,(503) 624-9800 Company Name: ~____~ ~.~~, Project Name: 0~/.~ ~l: t~lg'~ Address: .¥'"7 I,~, '-~...~.Q,r"¢.- ~, ,,-J~//_~ " UNOCAL Project Manager: ¢'~ ~::~u~ iCity: ~ v~(~.~O State: ~ Zip Code: ~.~"E'Z.~ Release #: iTelePhone: (.,Z.O? ~) ~.~"-04Z4~ FAX #: I To: ,$~ QC Data: A (Standard) ~1 Level B ~ Level C {3 Level D Turnaround_-- 1/0 Working Days I~1 2 Working Days Drinking Water Time:~'5 Working Days ~ 24 Hours I~1 Waste Water I~ 3 Working Days I~1 2 - 8 Hours I~1 Other Client Date/Time Cont. Laboratory Sample I.D. Sampled Type Sample # Comment~ :' C-- :) 9. O Relinquished · ,1~/~ T'j~r'~''~ Rece, ~ ~,~/~m e: Relinquished By:-~ 'V~ / / ~- /,, , . ~. ~/ ............. ~ ~ / ~ate: .... ~. Time.----. Received By: Date: Time: Relinquished By: ./~-'--'----'"- Date:~.~_______.Time: ........ Received By Lab: p.--.-~/ ,,~-~ Date?/~///"~' Time: Were Samples Received in Good Condition? G(Yes Q No Samples on Ice? ~l~Yes Q No Method of Shipment. Page of ITc be completed upon receipt of report: 1) Were the analyses requested on the Chain of Custody reported? Q Yes Q No If no, what analyses are still needed? . 2) Was the report issued within the requested turnaround time? Q Yes Q No If no, what was the turnaround time? Q 680 Chesapeake Ddve · Redwood City, CA 94063 · (415) 364-9600 Q 18939 120th Ave., N.E., Suite 101 · Bothell, WA 98011 · (206) 481-9200 UNO[ RLQ 819 Striker Ave., Suite 8 · Sacramento, CA 95834 · (916) 921.9600 Q East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B · Spokane, WA 99206 · (509) 924.9200' Q 1900 Bates Ave., Suite LM o Concord, CA 94520o(510)686-9600 Q 15055S.W. SequoiaPkwy, Suite110o Poring, OR 977PP,(503) 624-9800 Company Name: ~_____~ ~2q~T(,~ Project Name: d (~OC_~f_, ¢ [~.~'~ City: ~~ State: ~ Zip Code: ~~ Release ~: ~o~ To: QC Data:~evel A (S~dard) ~ Level B Q Level C G Level D Turnaround ~ Working Days ~ 2 Working Days Drinking Water Time: . ~ Working Days ~ 24 Hours -- -~ -~ ~.Waste Water ~3 Working Days ~2-8 Hours ~ ~ ~ ~ Other Client Date~ime Cont. Laborato~ Sample I.D. Sampled Typa Sample ~ Comments Relinquished By:'~ '~ -- ~~ Date: -- ~ Received-~: ~ -~ Date~Time:/ Relinquished By: Date: Time: ,, Received By Lab: ~ Date:~ Time: / Were Samples R~eived in Good Condition? ~Yes Q No Samples on Ice? ~Yes Q No Method of Shipment Page _ of _ To be Completed upon receipt of repo~: 1) Were the analyses requested on the Chain of Custody reposed? ~ Yes Q No If no, what analyses are still needed? 2) Was the repo~ issued within the requested tumaround time? Q Yes Q No If no, what was the turnaround time? Q 680 Chesapeake Ddve · Redwood City, CA 94063 · (415) 364-9600 Q 18939 120th Ave., N.E., Suite 101 · Bothell, WA 98011 · (206) 481-9200 UNOCRL Q 819 Striker Ave" Suite 8' Sacrament°' CA 95834 ' (916) 921'9600 Q East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B · Spokane, WA 99206 · (509) 924-9200' [3 1900 Bates Ave., Suite LM o Concord, CA 94520o(510)686-9600 Q 15055S.W. SequoiaPkwy, Suite110.Po~and, OR 97o22.2,(50.3)624-9800 Company Name: Project Name: ~/~4/~.,~.~-~--- //~7' Address:/7/Z ~-~..~(2./'~ r--~//S ., UNOCAL Project Manager: State: Zip Release #: QC Data:. A (Standard) [~l Level B ~ Level C ~ Level D Turnaround ~,,10 Working Days ~ 2 Working Days Drinking Water /ses Requeste( Time: ~5 Working Days '[221 24Hours ~ Waste Water ~ 3 Working Days I~l 2 - 8 Hours I~ Other Client Date/Time Cont. Laboratory Sample I.D. Sampled Type Sample # Comments '1 I .--'VVt-.- I' 2. ."/" l---W'- ~""1 [ 'Z"~ , 3. j'Z.- V,./--} o. (g4Si lO. 553 "2 o Relinquished By:~ D~ Time: Received By: · Relinquished By: /~ i Date:'~ ~me: Received By Lab:.~~-- ~ ~ate: ~//[/~Time: ['& ~ Were Samples Received in Good Condition? ~Yes Q No Samples on Ice? ~Yes Q No Method of Shipment Page ~ of _ To be completed upon receipt of repoA: 1) Were the analyses requested on the Chain of Custody reposed? Q Yes Q No If no, what analyses are still needed? 2) Was the repo~ issued within the requested tumaround time? Q Yes Q No If no, what was the turnaround time? Cji) R RECT, I 0 N N O~:C E BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT '!"~ gO~5 Location /"V~ (~ _< Sub Div./~o( I~aa~&~ . Blk. · . . ~t You are hereby required t~ake the follo~ng corrections at the above l~ation: ~ co,. No I Completion Date fo,' Corrections . ]~/~-/¥~'/ ' Date --,~--/~ ~'/~'Y ~~ ~ ~~ 326-3979 ~, RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: /&--o ! ~.J~, ~:~ ID# Business Name: /"L/~{~.~r'5 ~ ~ c~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ Conta~Name: ~r~ ~% ~ ~>~ ~~'~ / Business Phone: F~: Inspe~or's N~e: ~ TimeofC~l: Date: ~(~4/~ Time: ~ ~ ~ ain: ~ Type of C~I: incoming ~ Outgoing [ ] Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: / ~"c:~ :~,r-~ .~L.' ID#~ Business Name: ~c~ '~ ~"5 ~ ~7 Contact Name: ~ss~//' ,~-~'~,~,,,~, .- ~~s~r~ Business Phone: ~o~ / 'z~ - ~4 ~4 F~: Inspe~or's N~e: ~ Time of C~I: Date: ~/4/~4 Time: ~ ~· Min: ~ Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing ~ Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: /~/ ~?:~ ~ ID# \ · J Contact Name: Business Phone: ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ F~: I nsp~or's N~e: ~me of C~I: Date: Type of C~I: Incoming [ ] . Outgoing [~ Return~ [ ] Content of Calh Actions Required: ,¢-/~,:; ~,/~. /z/~, y/ 0~// ~P--~/-,, ~yff~¥~ o"-/D -2,77- --~AZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISIO~ 2130 G Street, ' Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-39'79 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM J FACILITY ./V~/~/~ ~ ADDRESS J6~/ ~u~,~ OWNER On,~_ ,~ d>~ ~ C~, PERMIT' TO OPERATE~ CONTRACTOR ~'~3~,~31_ CONTACT PERSON ~ /4-~/~_ . LABORATORY ~e~ ~~ # OF SAMPLES k~ ~~ ~ ~ P~,?d~ ' TEST METHODOLOGY PRELIMANARY ASSESSMENT~CO. CONTACT PERSON CO~ RECIEPT w/ LEL% , C~ O~% ~ PLOT PLAN-' CONDITION OF PIPING ~k~.~l~% .~ CONDITION OF SOIL INSPEC~ N~ AN ESOP COMPANY ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING ,, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH McDOWELL BOULEVARD - PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA 94954-1469 (707) 765-1660 ~lailing Address: P,0. Box 750908, Petaluma, CA 94975-0908 Fax (707) 765-99D8 BR,A,,,,=. Z,*A July 11, 1994 ~.=.,.~c~ City of Bakersfield Fire Department ~*,[ ~. --~ H~dous Materials Division By. 2101 "H" Street ~,~, ~,, .... Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: UNOCAL Service Station/11367 1501 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, California RHL JOB//1467.30 To those concerned, On behalf of UNOCAL Corporation, we would like to make application for a Permit to remove the underground storage tanks located at the above referenced facility. These tanks include two 10,000 gallon product tanks and one 550 gallon waste oil tank. Please find enclosed an application for removal of underground storage tanks, state A & B forms, a site plan and a check for $1449.00 to cover the permit fees. If you have any questions or comments please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, " ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES~ INC. Bob McCormick Job Captain cc: Mr. Frank Pinnell - F.S.E./UNOCAL Corporation BELLEVUE, WA LA HABRA, CA MARIETTA, GA SACRAMENTO, CA ~~ ~l Bakersfield Fire Dept. ~ I. I~I![ZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISIO :1~ .... UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE d~,,~J--~'J~JVI~.~."T.I.I.I.I.I.I.I~. _ADDRESS [~ ~~ZIP CODE ~ APN FACILI~ NAME ~~.~'~l~ CROSS STREET ~~ TANK OWNER/OPERATOR U~ ~~~~ ~HONE NO. MAILING ADDRESS ~~ ~ I~~~~ClW ~~ ZIP CODE ~ CONTEACTOE INFOEMATION COMPANY ~~ ~~~ PHONE No~~-~O' LICENSE No. ADDRESS t~l~ ~~~ - CIW~ ZIP CODE~ INSURANCE ~ARRIER ~~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No.~~~ PEE[IMANAEY ASSEMENT INFOEMATION COMPANY~ ~~ PHONE N~~[~ LICENSE ADDRESS~ ~~ ~V~.~~ CI~~~ ZIP CODE INSURANCE ~AR'RIER '~~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No. ~~~ TANK CLEANING INFOEMATION COMPANY ~~,~ t~~~ PHONE No.~~ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~~ CIW ~~ ZIP CODE WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILIW ~~ ADDRESS ~ ~~ ~~ ' CIW ~ ZIP CODE ~ FACILIW INDENTIFICATION NUMBER TANK TEANSPOETEE INFOEMATION COMPANY~~ I~~ PHONE NO. ~~1~ LICENSE NO. ~ ADDRESS~ ~ ~~ CIW ~ ZIP CODE ~ TANK DESTINATION ~~~ t TANK INFOEMATION TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED. UNDERSTANDS. AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE AT[ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE..~~~~~.~ AI~RO~rED~ APPLICANT NAME (PRINT) ~ A~PLrCA~GNA~II~EE - THIS APPLIOAIION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED STATE OF CAUFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM/~ "' ':"' COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY/SITE MARK ONLY [] I NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ONE ITEM [] 2 IN'F~RIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE I. FAClLrrY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED) ~DBA OR FACILI'P¢ NAME~~/~.~''` ~"~1'~'~1~1~1~~ I'~/~l NAME OF OPERATOR ADDRESS ...... , t ' NEAREST CROSS STREET PARCEL it {OFrlONAL) CI~ NAME STATE ZiP CODE SITE PHONE # WITH AREA CODE CA -"' ./~x [~-- TO INDICATE CORPORATION I--] iNDIVIDUAL ~ PARTNERSHIP r-~ LOCAL.AGENCY [---'1 COUNTY-AGENCY n'-] STATE-AGENCY I~ FEDERAL.AGENCY DISTRICTS EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY) - optional I DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE I DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) NIGH. TS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) ' _ ~-- -- ,,,,..~..- I NAME I CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION I MAILING OR STREETADDRE~S . v/ box toindicate %ORPO,A ON I,IVIOUA m LO AL-A ENOV STATE-AGENOY [~1 PARTNERSHIP [~] COUI~ffY-AGENCY n-I FEDERAL-AGENCY CI]'Y NAME ~ ~ - - ~ STATE ZIP CODE PHONE # WITH AREA CODE II1. TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME OF OWNER CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ' ~' box Ioindicate ~ INDIVIDUAL n-I LOCAL-AGENCY [~ STATE-AGENCY CO,PO,A O, ,AR?,E,S,,, COU,--,,GENC¥ ,ED RAL ,,,NC ' - -" .... ! STATE ZlPCODE PHONE ~ WITH AREACODE IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise. V. PETROLEUM MST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED [ ,/ bo~ Io indicate [2:2] 1 SELF-INSURED J;2~] 2 GUARANq'EE I'~] 3 INSURANCE [:::3 4 SUR~ ~OND [:~ 5 LETTER OF CREDIT [~ 6 F..XEMP~ON ~ 99 OT~ER VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notification and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked. THIS FORM HAS BEENCOMPLETED UNDER~pEN~4ETY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT I APP~ T~..._~_.~RLN. T_~D_ & ~.~.__A__ATURE) ~ ~ (::~~PPUCAN~S T~TLE I DATE MONTH~DAY,~EAR LOCAL AGENCY USE~ONLY ' / (-.."/ ~ COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # LOCATION CODE - OPTIONAL CENSUS TRACT # - OPTtONAL SUPVISOR - DISTRICT CODE - OPTIONAL THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY.AT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY. FO RM A (5-91 ) FOROO33A-5 ~I'ATE OF CALIFORNIA ~,,~,,~ ~* ' STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD .... ~ UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B .~'~'~'~,,,.~ COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEN[ ; ~ MARK ONLY [] I NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF iNFORMATION [~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE~ 8 TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEMS - SPEC~F~ ~F UNKNOWN c. DATE ,NSTALLED(M DAY EAR, t 'q O. TANK CAPAC,. ,, GALLO,S: II. TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED. COMPLETE ITEM C. A. 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OiL B. C. UNLEADED [] 4 GASAHOL [] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY [~1 PRODUCT [] lbPREMIU. [] 7 METHANOL UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM O. BELOW D. IF (A.1) iS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [~ 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANIO [] 99 OTHER B. TANK [~ I BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING C, INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED ~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTHIFAPPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A ~ 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A~e/)l SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION 6 TANK TESTING ~ 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY, ~ TO/~HE BEST OF MY.Y~WLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT LOCAL AG ENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. HUM§ER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK # PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE I PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED, FILE THIS FORM WITH THE LOCAL AGENCY IMPLEMENTING THE UNOERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS FORM B (12-91) FOROO341LR6 81'ATE OF CAUFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARK ONLY [] I NE-'~N PERMIT [] 3 RENE~NAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [~_ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE[~ 8 TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEMS - SPECIFY ~F UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK ,.0., s. MA,UFAO RED BY: c. DATE ,NSTALLEO MO,DA, EAR, I J 't D. TA,K CAPAC, 'N GALLONS: II. TANK CONTENTS ~FA-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C. A. ~ 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL []4 OIL S. O' [] laREGULAR ~3 DIESELUNLEADED 4 GASAHOL [] 6 AVIATION GAS 2 ,ETROLEUM [] EMP ' PRODUCT ,,PREM,U [] METH "OL UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM 9, BELOW D. IF (A.1) iS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C, A. S. #: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM ~ 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B. TANK ~] I BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 RUBBER L,NED [] ~ AL~D L.N,NG [] ~ EPOX~ L,N,.G [] ~ .HE.OL~ LmN,NG C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED ~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER UNING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ O. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E, SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U I SUCTION A~')2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVl3Y A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A~J'-~I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH · A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION j~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 I~rERSTITIAL MONffORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION 6 TANK TESTING 7 ~NTERSTITIALMONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION I1. ESTIMATED DATE ?;~IDAY/YR) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF I3' wAS TANK FILLED wITH YES [] SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~;? GALLONS INERT MATERIAL ? THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY, AND~T'O T~E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT I APPLICANT'S NAME ~ ~I~-,~.~ ~ ~--~~-- ~) I DATE LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBE~ ~S CO~POSEBOFTHE FOUR NU~BELOW COUN~ · JURISDICTION ~ FACIL~ ~ TANK ~ STATE I.D.~ ~ / 7 1ol I THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FI~D. FILE THIS FORM WffH THE LOCAL AGENCY IMPLEMENTING THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGU~TIONS FORM B (12-91) ~O~R6 8'I'ATi OF CAUFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROl. BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEU. MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 6 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON 81TE ONE fiRM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE[~ 8 TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEMS - SPECIFY 'F UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I.D.# ~ ,~ ~ I B. MANUFACTURED BY: c. DATE INsTALLED,MO/DAY,EAR, O. TANK CAPACI IN G LONB; II. TANK CONTENTS ~F A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C. A. [] 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [~ 4 OIL B. C, [] la REGULAR [] 3 DIESEL [] 6 AVIATION GAS UNLADED [] 4 GAS'~OL [] 2 PETROLEUM [] .0 EMPW [] ~ PRODUCT [] ~bPREMlUM~ [] 7 METHANOL [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN J~] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADEDJ,Z~J 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW~ D. IF (A.1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED I~"g:;:~:~ ~,~~ ~L,/ c.A.S. #: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANIO [] 99 OTHER B. TANK ~ 1 BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (Primal'yTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING C. INTERIOR LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE ~,t~3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A~I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL WI COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U g GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [~] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUNDWATER MONITORING 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND~O__ T~ BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT APPL CAN~S NAME ~ ~~..~ ¥~/~.~ ~ ~ ~. _ ~ DATE LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER'IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW I COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK # STATE I.D.# II I I II PERMIT EXPIBATION DATE PERM IT APPROVED BY/DATE IPERMITNUMBER THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. FILE THIS FORM WITH THE LOCAL AGENCY IMPLEMENTING THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS FORM B (12-91) FORO~4B-R6 ~ Bakersfield Fire Dept. / PERMIT~-~~ -HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISIO~ ... UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE ~~~, .,~A'P,_ff~,d ADDRESS ~_=3~ 1~;I;~I:2/~,¢~,ZIP CODE ~ APN FACILITY NAME kBNV'~A/~ ~-~"~'~ t~/_~. CROSS STREET ~~ TANK OWNER/OPERATOR U~ C.I:::A~~~)~ PHONE No. MAILING ADDRESS ~t~_A~ ~ II~/t.l~ ~i"CITY _{¢AE.~ ZIP CODE CONTRACTOR INFORMATION COMPANY I,~1¢~'~ d'~.q'l/~l~_ PHONE Nog~:~-~---_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_~-~"JO' LICENSE No. 4-l~i~.'~"~ ADDRESS I~11~-~ ~[~,4¢~ - CIT~~ ZIP CODE INSURANCE dARRIER ,~T.~..'TI~_, ,t:a3t4~::~ WORKMENS COMP No. _~;~..-~.Z~. PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION COMPANY~ ~ PHONE Nc~C-j-~-'~4~[O'~ LICENSE No.4"!"1~2i-- ADDRESS~-)"I P_Jvt~t~_..~ ~..tVF_,:,~L~A CITY~Lgl~~ ZIP CODE ~.c~\, INSURANCE (~AR'RIER '~JC;L,~I~I,& ~ WORKMENS COMP No. TANK CLEANING INFORMATION ADDRESS ~ 1;¢~ 1~o.3'~ CITY ~ ZIP CODE WASTE TRANSPORI'ER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILITY ~=:;I::~._-,~.,~ [~.~..~a-'~ ADDRESS ~ t~,ZM~,,~,, ~/M~I;2:~ ' CITY ~ ZIP CODE FACILITY INDENTIFICATION NUMBER TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANYE~~ lt,~~ PHONE No. ~::)'~"~"1_~2'~ LICENSE No. (:::It.g?) TANK DESTINATION- !~~--~¢:~ TANK INFORMATION TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED >'.:.,.:.:.x<.:.'~:::':-~':~:.~ ~.::.'~:-:..:-;,:.~--' :~::~..~.~.~:i~:.:.:.:`..:....:~:~:.:.:.~:~:..~.:~:.:.;.~:+:::::~:.~:~:~>:*~:~:~$~<~ '"~x-~' - ' -..~'. '~.'.-':~?-: ..:~:~.'..-'~:.:.' ':'4::.';~::;:~:'.':.:<-.'.A.:~2:¢.~.::~"~.-:~::::.-: 'x~i~.?~..,y:.:c~:-.-:~:..':.,':-x,,:-:.:-.:-:-:.: .-~:-:~,.:~-'.-*r-~.'-,. ~ ..... ~,-,.'<<~,:~,:..~...~ ,......<..,..,.~,~ ....,,,,.:.-,... z..>.-.?...';:.-.<.:..-.:.:.:.~.....:¥.::.<:..:..-.:.:.-:,....:-:.S ....... ::::-. z...~:; ........... <.~.,...'~.-?...'-':~.'-.'-."-~¢:-'.,-:,':.,..:~..,,.~;:-.~...*-~:..-!Y-':'"~;,~-.'.'~.,...:. ..... ~?>.'.:':}A .... ~:~:.::~-" >'~ !~ ..............................::;::'<'"':~.~:.;::-:~ ~':A~' ~..~'" ':A. ~.. "A'"'""' ~ ............. ~ ' ......... ~:"~:'"~ ~ ' ' ~' THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATI'ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNO~~ · AP~RO~ED~ APPLICANT NAME (PRINI~ ~' A~PL~'CA~4'T"S'/GNA~RE .... I · -~.... THIS APPLICAIION BECOMi:$ A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION .~ ' RECEIVED , '~Y 1 2 1994, .HAZ. MAT. DIV. May 04, 1994 City of Bakersfield Mr. Ralph Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator Bakersfield City Fire Dept. 2130 G. Street Bakersfield, CA 94704 Dear Mr. Huey: Enclosed is the test report for Unocal Station #1367, tested on ~pril 26, 1994. On behalf of Unocal Corporation, we at NDE are forwarding this test result to you. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Frank Miller, the account representative at (800}964-1250. Thank you, Sales Assistant CERTIFICATE OF UNDERI~ROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION :~ 20000 MARINER AVENUE, SUITE 500 TORRANCE, CAUFORNIA 90503 .f f (310) 542-4342 FAX (310) 542-6657 TEST RESULT SITE SUMMARY REPORT TEST TYPE: VPL? TEST DATE: Jt~r:l. 1 26, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913414 CLIENT: ~ CORPORATZON SITE: 13~iOCJLT~ 136'7 &?T: M:R T-uSTRI~ C,,~,,IG 1501 ~. O. ~OZ 2390 ~~Z~, ~ 93304 · ~, C~ 92622-2390 ~e following tests were condu~ at the s~e a~ve in a~rd~ ~th all appli~ble ~ions of Federal, NFP A and Io~1 r~ulations. Tank Tests 10 ~g~ 9,980 95.00 10[ ~.~gD 9,980 95.00 550 ~. ~S~ OZ~ 550 48.00 Line and Leak Detector Tests :~ .~? .... ~ .. ~ .~ ~ ~ ......:. '~ ~. .............. ':'~ ~. ~i~ .... ~. '~ ........ ' ...... ' '~' ~~' "*~:'~ ............................. ~:~;~ .....~.,. ~1~ 10 S~ER 10K S50 ~. WAS~ O~L NDE appreciates lhe opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in lhe future. Please call any time, day or night, when you need us. NDE Customer Service Representative: Test conducted by: FRAMK MZLLER ALAN TIIR(~KMORTON Reviewed:~/,~~~.=.., Technician Certification Number: lZ0'7 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION TEST DATE: ~z':i. 1 ;~6, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913414 CUENT: UBOC3LI, COItPORA?'rON SITE: Ola:)C3~ 1367 Tank ID: SSo ~. Bottom to top fill in inches: Product: ~ oil- Bottom to grade fill in inches: Capacity in gallons: Ss0 Fill pipe length in inches: Diameter in inches: 48. o0. Fill pipe diameter in inches: Length in inches: Mater~l: Tank: ~o Manifolded Vent: V/R: TI~ ~%BTE OIL TANK ]~AB A 2 INCH REMOTE FILL INBID~ THE 8BOP. Test method: New/passed Failed/replaced Psi at tank bottom: detector detector Fluid level in inches: Test method: UFT/OFT: Make: Fluid volume in gallons: Model: Water level in inches: o. oo S/N: Test time: Open time in sec: Number of thermisters: Holding psi: Specific gravity: Resiliency cc: Water table depth in inches: loo. O0 Test leak rate refrain: Determined by (method): Metering psi: Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: RESULT,' RESUL~ NO MI~TER ~.S FOUND IN TEE OB PORT. Test method: 03 Material: ~0~ Test time: 15: ¢ 0-16: 27 Diameter (in): Ullage volume: 550 Length (fi): Ullage pressure: ·. 00 Test psi: RESULT: Pxss Bleedback cc: DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Test time (min): Test 1: start time: Time of test 1:15:SS-16~05 fi~shpst: Temperature: 6 6.9 0 vol change cc: Flow rate (cfh): 0.2oo- Test2: start time: Time of test 2:16: 06-16 ~ 16 finish psi: vol change cc: Temperature: 67.00 Test 3: start Urne: Flow rate (cfh): 0.200- .r~sh psi: Time of test 3:16 ~ 17-16: 27 vol change cc: Temperature: 67.00 Final gph: Flow rate (cth): o.20o- RESULT: Test type: ~ Pump type: ~ Pump make: ~0~ ~OI~K PE~FO~ ON ·-26-94. 20000 MARINER AVENUE1 SUITE 500~ TORRANCE~ CALIFORNIA 90503 {3101 542-4342 SITE DIAGRAM NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 MARINER AVENUE, SUITE 500 TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 (310) 542-4342 FAX (310) 542-6657 TESTDATE: April 26, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913414 CLIENT:O~OCAL CORPORATION SITE: U~OC~T., 1367 N 92 89 87 SUP UNL WELLe 92 89 87 TURBINE 87 89 92 UNOCAL #1367 1501 BRUNDAGE ' ENTS BAKERSFIELD,CA WO 913328 3-24-94 i )UNOCAL CORPORATION SITE SURVEY Test Date: 04/26/94 Station no.: 1~67 Contractor. NDE Environmental Address: 1~01 BRUNDAGE AVE Tester: ALAN TltROCKMORTON City/S~p: B~.~RSFIEL, CA. 93:~04 DO RF~'ILL PIPES HAVE SPILL CONTAINMENT BOXES?: (Y/N) Ual 87 Ual 92 Dsl W/O Yes Are overfill boxes clean and in good repair? (YfN) Yes If no, list problem: DO TANKS HAVE OVERFILL WARNING DEVICES?: (Y/N) Un187 Un192 Dsl What type?: (Ball floats BF, Flapper valve FV) Unl 87 Un192 Dsl ARE DROP TUBES PROPER I.ENGTH?: (Y/N) Un187 Unl 92 Dsl Are tank bottom protectors installed?: (Y/N) Un187 Un192 Dsl Do they have proper gaskets and springs?: (Y/N) Unl 87 Unl 92 Dsl IMPACT VALVES: Number tested: Ual 87 0 Unl 92 0 Dsl 0 List non-operational valves by dispeser no.: OBSERVATION WF.I JLS: Caps in place ? (Y/N) Product in well ? (Y/N) Thickness Inches IS EMERGENCY SHUT OFF SWITCH PRESENT AND OPERATIONAL DISPENSERS: Ual 87 Ual 89 Ual 92 Dsl No. per: Nozzles: Comments: NONOESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION May 04, 1994 Unocal Station #1367 1501 Brundage Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93304 To whom it may concern: Enclosed please find the test report for site #1367 tested on April 26, 1994. Please keep this and any future test reports on file for the inspector to review should he happen to come on site. If you have any questions you can call your account representative, Mr. Frank Miller at 800-964-1250. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, [~ Jacqueline Gr~ppo Sales Assistant enclosure/jg CO R R ECTiJljp N NOTICE BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT Location Sub Div. I~( I~,,~,~ , Blk. . ~t You are hereby requir~ to make the following corrections at the above l~ation: Cor. No Completion Date fox' Corrections ~/~5~/J~"~'/ :' ...... insp~r~ 326'3979 ~ .OOND UNDERG ST E TANK INSPECTION :~:: ersfieid i~e Dept. HaZardouS Materials Division Date Completed .,~--/~/,,~z./.~,' Operating Permit: 3.~>or,~ c.. ausinessName: ./V~/m~ (.:)~,:~>m "('~ Location: I, ~'~ I ~ ~P_~,r~ ,~f~,~-In Business Identification No. 215-000 t ('~ (Top of Business Plan) Number of Tanks. ~ Type: o'~.~. Containment: e,,e~ ~,~ 1· Lines: CONTACT INFORMATION Owner: ~^/~t~ ~,A Emergency Contacts: Adequate Inadequate Monitoring Program "~'/' I-I / ~ ~(~ ~ ~ Maintenance ~ ~ 3/~ ~//~ V Testing ~ ~ · Invento~ Reconciliation ~ ~ RESPONSE PLAN Emergency Plan Violations: . Busine~ ~e~ ' White - H~ Mat D~ Pink - Busings ~py NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION April 05, 1994 City of Bakersfield Mr. Ralph Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator Bakersfield City Fire Dept. 2130 G. Street Bakersfield, CA 94?04 Dear Mr. Huey= Enclosed is the test report for Unocal Station #1367, tested on March 24, 1994. On behalf of Unocal Corporation, we at NDE are forwarding this test result to you. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Frank Miller, the account representative at (800)964-1250. Thank you, Sales Assistant NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Avenue, Suite 500, Torrance, California 90503-1870 (310) 542-4342 · (800) 800-4NDE · FAX (310) 542-665'7, CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ~ 20000 MARINER AVENUE, SUITE 500 TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 J~ (310) 542-4342 FAX (310) 542-6657 TEST RESULT SITE SUMMARY REPORT TEST TYPE: VPLT TEST DATE: ~.rch 2~,· 3,99& WORK ORDER NUMBER: 93.3328 INVOICE DATE: INVOICE NUMBER: CLIENT: UNOCA~ CO:I~O:I~J~TZON SITE: 13N~ Z367 ~: ~ ~TER C~G 1501 BR~GE ~ P. O. BOX 2390 ~RSF~E~, ~ 9330~ B~, ~ 92622-2390 A~N: ~S~ The following tests were conducted at the site above in accordance with all applicable podions of Federal, NFP A and local regulations. Tank Tests 10 ~ER 9,980 95.00 P~S -0.007 PASS 10K ~ED 9,980 95.00 P~S -0.024 PASS Line and Leak Detector Tests 10 SUPER 0 · 000 P YES PASS 10K UNLEADED 0 · 000 P YES PASS NDE apPreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call any time, day or night, when you need us. NDE Customer Service Representative: Test conducted by: ~ FRANK MILLER ALAN THROCI~MORTON Reviewed: j / , Technician Certification Number: 13.07 ' NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION TEST DATE: ~rch 24, 1994 WORKORDER NUMBER: 913328 CLIENT: 13~ CO~OI~ikTZON SITE: OMOCSL~ 136'7 Tank ID: 10 Bottom to top fill in inches: Product: ~0~ Bottom to grade fill in inches: Capacity in gallons: ' 9,980 Fill pipe length in inches: Diameter in inches: 9.5. oo Fill pipe diameter in inches: Length in inches: 329 Stage I vapor recovery: STg~*~. Stage II vapor recovery: Material: Tank: No Manifolded Vent: t~o V/R: Test method: v~.; New/passed Failed/replaced Psi at tank bottom: 2.20 detector detector Fuel level in inches: 83.5o Test method: UFT/OFT: ~ Make: Z~,SD Fuel volume in gallons: 9,292 Model: ~. ~.. D. Water level in inches: 0.00 S/N: 308899881 Test time: 09 = 36-11= 3? Open time in sec: 3.5o Number of thermisters: 5 Holding psi: 16 Specific gravity: 0. ? 50 Resiliency cc: 300 Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/h: 180.0 Determined by (method): OBSERVXT;O Metering psi: 18 Leak rate in gph: -0.007 Calib. leak in gph: 3.00 .RESULT: ~ASS RESULT: THE QRODITD WATER LEVEL WAS BELOW THE TANK BOTTOMS, Test method: OTS-4 S~STEM Material: F~BEaGLASS Test time: 12 = 00-12: 4,7 Diameter (in): 2. o Ullage volume: 688 Length (in): 50.0 Ullage pressure: 2.20 Test psi: 5o RESULT: ]~a,ss Bleedback cc: 0 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Test start time 30 Test 1: start time: 10 ~ 20 Time of test 1:12 = 1,5-12 = 25 finish psi: 50 Temperature: 64.40 vol change cc: 0 Flow rate: 0.200-0.200 Test 2: start time: 10~31 finish psi: 50 Time of test 2:12 = 2 6-12 = 3 6 vol change cc: 0 Temperature: 64.50 Test 3: start time: 10=42 Flow rate: O. 200-o. 200 finish psi: $0 Time of test 3:13: 37-12 = 47 vol change cc: 0 Temperature: 64.50 Final gph: 0. 000 Flow rate: 0.2oo-o. 20o RESULT: PAss Test type: ;.1,~-e8 Pump type: P~zssuaz Pump make: ~D JACI~ET 20000 MARINER AVENUE~ SUITE 5001TORRANCE~ CALIF ,ORNIA 90503 1310) 542-4342, NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION TEST DATE: March 24, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913328 CLIENT: O~OCJkTa COIR~OI~JkTZON SITE: O~ 1367 Tank ID: Z0K Bottom to top fill in inches: 136.0 Product: ONL.I~,ADED Bottom to grade fill in inches: 132.0 Capacity in gallons: 9,98O Fill pipe length in inches: 31.0 Diameter in inches: 95. oo Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 329 Stage I vapor recovery: co~x s~t'E~-~. Stage II vapor recovery: Material: Tank: NO - Manifolded Vent: No V/R: Yzs Test method: VPL? New/passed Failed/replaced Psi at tank bottom: 1o 80 detector detector Fuel level in inches: 69.50 Test method: FTA U FT/OFT: OFT Make: aaD Fuel volume in gallons: ?, 823 Model: x. ~.. D. Water level in inches: 0.00 S/N: 112913332 Test time: 09..4,4-11..4,? Number of thermisters: 5 Open time in sec: 3. oo Holding psi: 10 Specific gravity: 0. ?so Resiliency cc: 6O Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/h: 180.0 Determined by (method): OBSER%'~T~rO Metering psi: S Leak rate in gph: -0. O24 Calib. leak in gph: 3.00 RESULT: PASS RESULT: PASS Test method: OT8-4 ~¥8?EM Material: Test time: 13 ~ 00-12 ~ 47 Diameter (in): 2.0 Ullage volume: 2,157 Length (in): 50.0 Ullage pressu re: 2.20 Test psi: s 0 RESULT: ~ASS Bleedback cc: o DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Test start time 30 Time of test 1:12:15-12 =25 Test 1: start time: lO~25 finish psi: 50 Temperature: 63.80 vol change cc: o Flow rate: o. 2 o 0- o. 2 0 0 Test 2: start time: lO = 36 finish psi: 50 Time of test 2:12 t 26-12 ~ 36 vol change cc: o Temperature: 63.90 Test 3: start time: 10 ~ 47 Flow rate: 0.200-0.200 finish psi: 50 'l~me of test 3:12 ~ 37-12 t 4? . vol change cc: o Temperature: 64. oo Final gph: o. o00 Flow rate: o. 200-0 o 200 RESULT: ~As~ Test type: .i~%?i.:=:ii~:i::~t¥~.;;!:~? :!~MMENTS~ ::iii:~i:i~ii;!iii:i::i!i~ i!?;~i~:;~ Pump type: Pazsso~z Pump make: I~ED JACKET 20000 MARINER AVENUE~ SUITE 500r TORRANCE~ CALIFORNIA 90503 (310} 542-4342 SITE DIAGRAM NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION NDE ~oooo~,.~~. ~,~oo ~ ~ TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 (310) 542-4342 FAX (310) 542-6657 TESTDATE: March 24, 3.994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 93.3328 CLIENT: UNOCAL CORPORATION SITE: UNOCAL 3.367 N 92 89 87 SUP UNL WELL~ 92 89 87 TURBINE 87 89 92 UNOCAL #1367 1'501 BRUNDAGE ~ENTS BAKERSFIELD,CA WO 913328 3-24-94 UNOCAL CORPORATION SITE SURVEY CONTRACTOR: /%)/) _~ ADDRESS:/~-~0/ ~ REFILL PIPES ~VE SPILL CONTAI~ENT BOXES?: (Y/N) Unl 87 ~/ Unl 92 ~ Ds1 W/O / / Are overfill boxes clean and in good repair? (Y?N) If no, list problem: DO TANKS HAVE OVERFILL WARNING DEVICE?: (Y/N) UnZ 87 t"~) Unl 92 /~/ Del What type? : (Ball floats BF, Flapper valve FV) Unl 87 Unl 92 Del ARE DROP TUBES PROPER LENGTH?: (Y/N) Unl 87 J Unl 92 J Del Are tank bottom protectors installed?: (Y/N) Unl 87 /~) Unl 92 /%j Del Do they have proper gaskets and springs?: (Y/N) Unl 87 j Unl 92 y Del IMPACT VALVES: Unl 87 3 Unl 92 ~ Number tested: List non-operational valves by dispenser no.: OBSERVATION WELLS: Caps in place?(Y/N) / Product in well ? (Y/N) ~ Thickness q inches IS EMERGENCY SHUT OFF SWITCH PRESENT AND OPERATIONAL? (Y/N) f DISPENSERS: Unl 87 ~ Unl 89 ,.~ Unl 97 ~ Del No. per: Nozzles: 3 ~ ~ Order number: 913328 THIS IS A COMPLIANCE TEST SEND REPORTS,INVOICES, & REG AGENCY COVER LETTER TO LESTER CHENG SEND TWO COPIES OF REPORTS TO JACKIE GRIPPO INVOICES SHOULD SHOW RELEASE NO. AS WELL AS PO NO. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST PERMIT TO OPERATE ~ OPERATORS NAME ~//~)OC/$ C. OWNERS NAME ////t)O~/D~/__ NI/MBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED IS PIPING GOING TO'BE TESTED TANK~ VOLUME CONTENTS / /4 ~,,~o ~,',,~ ~_ TANK TESTING COMPANYA/~- E~JU, eOA3mot,;rr~ ADDREss STATE REGIST~TION ~ DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CO~UCTED ~ '~ ~- ~ Unocal Petroleum P ts & Chemicals Division Unocal Corporation rO 2929 East Imperial Highway, RO. Box 2390 '~_' ~ Brea, California 92621 Facsimile (714) 572-7116 UNOCAL November 10, 1993 Bakersfield Fire Department RECEY~E.D 2130 G Street DEC. 2 1995. Bakersfield, CA 93301 CERTIFIED MAIL HAZ. MAT. DIV. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Dear Sir/Madam: Please accept this letter as my written notification for a change of address. Currently, the mail related to environmental compliance issues discussed in the attachment is being directed to the following address: Unocal Marketing Engineering & Construction (ME&C) 911 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Environmental Compliance Please note, the aboVe address will be changed as of November 15, 1993. The new mailing address is as follows: Unocal ME&C P.O. Box 2390 Brea, California 92622-2390 Attn: Environmental Compliance For your convenience, a list of Environmental Compliance staff and their responsibilities is attached with this letter. The above request does not include correspondence or permitting for Unocal "branded" Marketing facilities (operated and owned by independent re-sellers and jobbers), or other Unocal Divisions handling their permitting/compliance issues directly with you (i.e. Oil and Gas, Refining, Remedial/on etc.). Our most current list of Unocal "controlled units" (facilities owned, operated or leased by Unocal) within your jurisdiction is also attached. Any correspondence concerning on-going site investigation and clean up must continue to be mailed to the responsible Unocal Remediation Engineer at his/her office address. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, Bea Co Best 11/08/93 UNOCAL HARKETING FACILITIES IN BAKERSFIELD Page 1 UNIT BP TYPE SITE ADD CITY COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE STATUS 1367 1501Brundage Lane BakersfieLd Kern CA 93304 Op 3609 3000 Hi[es St. BakersfieLd Kern CA 93306 Op 4888 2699 Mt. Vernon BakersfieLd Kern CA 93306 Op 5488 5401Stockdate High.ay BakersfieLd Kern CA 93309 Op 557'5 2502"Min~ BakersfieLd Kern CA 93304 Op 7~C~/(~) 6089 2524 Os.e[[ Street BakersfieLd Kern CA 93306 Op ~7~ 0 J 7225 18 Weedpatch H~y. Rt. ~5 BakersfieLd Kern CA 93306 Op 7-593 8200-A Stockda[e H~/ BakersfieLd Kern CA 93311 Op / TI-IE MEC COMPLIANCE DEPT RELOCATES TO SATURN BUSINESS PARK 11/15/93 MEC Environmental Compliance Saturn Business Park Mailing Address .2929 Imperial Hwy P.O. Box 2390 Brea, California 92621 Brea, California 92622-2390 ~arketinq Facility Service Station/Bulk Plant Compliance Issues: For permit renewals, permit fees and permit invoices: Luis Amado (Permit Analyst) - (714) 572-7659 Victor Perrin (Permit Analyst) - (714) 572-7658 For UST/AST compliance, tank closures, tank and line upgrades and monitoring issues: Bob Matson (UST/AST Coordinator) - (714) 572-7656 For notices of violation, inspection reports and non-compliance issues: Syed Rizvi (NOV Coordinator) - (714) 572-7655 For unauthorized release and spill reporting: Lynda Chalom (Leak Reporting Coordinator) - (714) 572-7653 For tank and line test information and electronic monitoring system certification: Lester Cheng (Tank Testing Analyst) - (714) 572-7657 For site Business Plans (HMMP's), chemicals inventory disclosure, hazardous waste management, disposal and manifestation, and Permit by Rule information: Dave Corder (Hazmat Coordinator) - (714) 572-7651 For NPDES program, industrial waste water discharges, vapor recovery requirements, AB 2588 Plans. and Reports, and emission reduction credits: Jean Young (Air/water coordinator) - (714) 572-7654 For environmental documentation, file review and records information: Elvia Heredia (Environmental Clerk) - (714) 572-7665 Marketinq Terminal Compliance Issues: Jim Scott (Terminal Compliance Coordinator) - (714) 572-7663 Manager Environmental support (714)572-7649 (To be announced) BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAzARDous STORAGE FACILITY Permit No.: 270006C State ID No.: 31730 Issued to: NOLAN'S UNOCAL SERVICE Location: 1501 BRUNDAGE LN BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304 Owner. UNOCAL CORPORATION 2000 CROW CANYON PL., SUITE 450 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 Operator:. NOLAN W. BERST 1501 BRUNDAGE LN BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304 Facility Profile: Year Is Piping Tank No. Substance Capaci .ty Installed 1 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL ? YES 2 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL ? YES This permit is granted subject to the conditions listed on the attached summary of conditions and may be revoked for failure to adhere to the stated conditions and/or violations of any othgr State or Federal regulations. Issued by: Ralph E.. Huey Issue· Date: JULY 1, 1991 aZardous _. ___ __ _____ ____ Expiration Date: JULY 1, 1994 ' POST ON PREMISES NONTRANSFERABLE Unocal Petroleum ProWs & Chemicals Division Unocal Corporation 911 Wilshire Blvd., RO. Box 7600 Los Angeles, California 90051 Facsimile (213) 977-5389 RECEtt/ED UNOCAL AZ. August 6, 199~3 Mr. Ralph Youie city of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Division 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, California 93301 R 1367 Dear Ralph: Per our telephone conversation today, enclosed you will find the maintenance repair detail forms from Unocal contractor Bakersfield Service Station Repair. The contractor has detailed the repair information for your review. Based on the information provided, it is not likely that a release of product occurred. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. Should you have any questions, please call me at (213) 977-7063. ~Z~ioordinator SNR/lc Enclosures cc: Leak Reporting Notebook .... . ...... :: ....... -':-,.- ..'.'.- (.:-:.,-? o~.i'.'-..:;.-.;..::"-'-"-.-' :;f ; ;. ~e'/B~Ord~. -"-:: .'.".: .'... '; ;' .. .... I'---..- '-"..-. .; .... '_,: -;.' :-_-' ..... '.,.--. '- :. ~: · :...; ...... ".U~:~ ~,~~- 7- ~ .- .... -:'.' ': '- .... ' : ":",. ' L~'~II~LIJ~' I ,- ': ' :' ' .'" '.' '"" '- -'-'-': .: ' '' - ', ' ' ~"'-- . - - ,.~ - . ..-:': .:. - -'- -'- -:-, .... - ' ' .:' · ": ..'--: .-' -' ' UNOCAL~, :::~.",i; ': ,,~~ :~, ~ ':.' - :-.,'.. :; '"~"' ' '"- "" '-'.'.'--' ~".,':'; ~;'"'.""'.-:'.' ':'.i. :';: ', o '-:."-'- ; ::' '" ' '" ~:":,r:...-. ' "" ' ' ' ~ '"::" ?;' "' :''''~'''' · " " ~,,~'"s"~/¢- "::' ,., .. ...... ...,,. , :,,,,,,,, .....:.-:..,...:."....--..:.-,-..,-:.:..-.- !"',- ., ,.--.-- '-' -: -v"-'. ::,: ..... : l ,5',,;, ,/¢ : ' -.' .... ..... "' - ~-"-"-'":"' "' 2.- / .... ' ' -' '""' ..-;'- '."-- .-. "....'": ':..-.'. ', ":' " " " .... "' ...... ' ........... W~'~B C'gll~q~ - ~,..' ...,. '.... :.-:.,.. -:..-.... . . .... .. .... :. ."'~...-.'. ".:..'..-.; . ',. :. .,.."' . .- ...... ...-.;-:,.~. : .... ... , . . · . '. i".:: ............... ~--.-_-.: ,.- --:.-,~-.- .... '--: .... ,: ....... "', ,....-",---..- : ..... ' ..... .- '" ~ ~ . · ':.-'...;:..~'.:~ ,.. :: :.::,.:::,?...-:. ;,. ::.:,;: .: .. ~..~.:.--. ~-':,,,,,~ ;',,~,,~-~.,~:-;:.;._ :...,.. _-.-: ..', ~-:-.~,-,; ~-: ..--... ;. ;.: :'-..~.-.:. ~ -~.-:¢-:. ::.;-,:..--'.,.. u,u~:~ -.-!-..-:~ ..... -,.,-,. :- -:---,'- .- ---' .-.-:--'- '-: -. ?--.,...~,~i~..~.:'.",::"'-- ..... · .............. .-- .-- .............. : .......... . ...... -:-, .... ... - . · _ /...?:;.~,t~',~ml,,~%--';':-'. ... ..... -. .-- _ , --':-.~..,,,..;>,,.'-~.,-,.,,,- ,-r.,,-,,;.,....' ,:.:,,,/..,-. ,;,-/,~.-.~..-,.,,,;,?;',.;,,., !. ~_~'.'~ 45!¢ .--;,".~,,,..:,.'--:-- - -.- '-.¢-. '/~'7-' b- ""i-" ', :;'"¢," ",,.,~.;k'. '~,,-.-.'/-:~-r~.-'"z/.;.-:'~: ;,,~/'L.-,..,.,,;.,.,...,,.,,.,.,;-:.' . :-:: .l--:i -.!.-- -.:';~ ,:.~2 --'-----.. --- :/--:- ¢:-P:,. :~--:~._ ' · . .. ..... . . .. ~- : | ..:~' .- . ,, :...-.'"": ' _,,:.,...,~;.~ ~/... :,,,'-,.,,,,.....,./.z.,.'--~..~ .,:;,-.."",-Z,,..:-,.r_ ,-..z ~,,,f.,,,. _. .' ,' : .,, ,. '. -- :.,, ..'--..! . .... . .. ..~ ...',. .. . : ..... ..;... .;,:.." . .; '..-'-: . ,,...,. -.. , ......... '~'''"~'"-'~" '"" "" :" ....... "'" :"~-' : " "';"'" "'" '" ~ ....... '' ";:':" ' '~ I~_ ~ ' r' - ' "';""" ' :' ' I " ' '" ' :'~ " :: : " '"-':'"' '""; .... :' Ii f~i'"':. "' . ..... . ..... ........ . ..... ....:.. .... . : ,--; .............. -: .._.....1.. - ':'?""'-" ' '-: :' : "..': ........ ,:I ""' ' i. '":'~'" .-I- ," ...... ' .... '"' ' .... ''"" ' ' .... :' -- - . ..... : -.: . .;. . i '- " ' I, k.. , · ! __- · ., : , : ': '"' '"' ";; ~ '" ' '; '-"" '" ' ..... " ' : ;' ~ r ";" ' "' ':' ' ' ' r . " ,: .-.,~-.- .-_~ '.. ~ .... .. ...... .. ...... ~ . --m :.. .: ;-',' ":: i "' :"' ' ':-""";' -s - ...--: -',:' ~: · ': ':-'..': ..-,'." :" '"" ~"'"" ' "" "'" -----' '- - .-.,: ' I :' ,,'" . -- -'-:.-.'-' ........... ..- ..... ..-.-- ~:~:~:.~-:4- -~s'.-!~: -.::----,--.-.--.:.--. .... :--~,' ' J-"'; -':,-=.'-';::--,----'- -' ...... -" ' .;-:' '-:.:.--:,-- "; ' .,'~, -"-" ',-:-.,1 .... , ,. .,--..-'.;~.~'~,~:.-.:.-..: ~:':.-~.'..,,. . ?.,;~..:.,.,...:,~;~.,~:?,..~:¢.,;~~s,:~:=.-..?..:.;?.,,:,¢:~,.:;,..,.. ?:~~.::..~:,~, ~ , ,. , . .... :.-::.. -.- .-. j · :'.-.,.-,'- :-,- . :" ,:- .. ' '.' ~....; .:...... ?:_ :. _ ._. :~ .. :: : .. :: ,~.'r~. · ~j ,,. ....... .... ::- ,, . _ . .. "' "- ........... "~'" '"'"''~""'"' .... ',,~,,~_'!:- ' ... ; T- .! ?..'..-.: .'--.' -.-,--. .-. - : ~ . _ -. ..,,,,.::.' ~.~ : :'::': "'-/.. i .,.:~:?_.~.: .-- ... ... ".-; . ...... :.::,...:.-'.~,;:;,.:~,:.:; ..... :: ;. :.. · ;_ . , .~ J.J: ,~;.- . ,.='.;-- ' ,. m ' ':. .:'. ...... · ..... , - - , - '~ ::' .~..'t--.i~,;,. . . , . '/. ~ 0 &m' , ,''- . ' I I I · - - j II!!i111111~ '"' '-1,. ..... '.: . . m ]. .. ' .:..... . -~' ." .' : .':' ...... " .:: :.- .......... lImIt'" ~' "-' " '-" .'~ :..:.... . .... .-. . .. . ...:"-' ". ~r~~~ ............. ..:,~.~_'..:.-- , ";:':::" ' :" ': """ '" ...... "' ................ : .............. ;'"'"*"':""'"": ' '~.:.~i. ......... '""- ...... ~to~ler-am~w:~:v ,am~.. ... " "!~:'"' ' , ,.,i: ' "i-'":';;. ' . . ..... :.;.-.:..: , tm~...- . ':' .- ,. .. :..- ......... .'i.' ..... .'..:.,. ..... -4.:.. I~ITUI~-TIt4E,-A~.SE~AIflS'PE. flR]itME~''~; ~-m,~mlg~l~.. ' '; ":" , .' ' ' ' "' ' ' " " ' ..... ' .... ..,,~,,~~~.-... 7-'. ...... ' '";:- '~" ' i.J · ,,.,....~:...:..., .., .. ,.. :.:... ....... ...,::.......:..,_.= ,,:.:.. ..... .,.;,..-....~:..,., ...... ..::...~,,::.,~....:.:~:.......:;,.: ,.::~.. ,...:-, ... ::.,:-.:,.: ,::..,_,-,-:...._ .:..~:,~.,??,:/:.:.:..,...-...:.,-...: ,,:. :4~,-.¢.';:',':.,, i~-"::': .':' '---':'?'~. ;i; '"'::' ":':' '"' '": ..... ..... "'"':':" "' '"':"': ..... ~j.,L . ..- ..-.-.: ..: - ...: .:-. :.:- .-,¥~ .... ..u':... ::..~...,.,-.~;. :2 .'. ... .:-,~:::-:,~:'. ..... '~.:--.":-'=:-'-: JUL--~ 1--~ S~T 9 FROM B. ~. ~. R. I~. p. ~ INVOICE: 006~ 10-03-1992 )CAL OIL COMPANY STATION 1367 ~ WIt. SHIRE BLVD, ~tOlO .t~ ~1 ~ ANBELES, CA. 90017 ~~ .-0) 72~-7600 '~TOMER NO. 21 P.O. NO. :NDBOO25D ~EBO01 JOB~ ~207 ' ~TTACHED WORK ORDER. M NO, QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST AMOUNT ..'~ 0 1 MI~C PART8 128.33 TOTAL MATERIAL COST .... .... . .......... 121i~,Ei3 CALIFORNIA SALEB TAX .., ............... 9'30 IS: PAYMENT I8 DUE UPON B5.~5 HRB. · 30/HR t,057.50 ~IPT OF INVOICE. ~TATEMENT8 0.00 HRS. 00.T. 0.00 ON REQUEST 70 MIL£~ t ,40 /~L 28.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 46.~0 VENDOR EQUIPMENT 350.00 TOTAL 1,619.~ R-97~ 8053273595 07-31-93 09:03AM PO08 :~06 CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Ave.ue, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310) 542-4342 TestDate: 24 Feb 1993 Work Order#: 911289 Client: UNOCAL CORPORATION Site: UNOCAL #1367 911 WILSHIRE BLVD 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE LOS ANGELES , CA 90017 BAKERSFIELD , CA Attn: STEPHAN CAMPBELL The following tests xvere conducted at the site described above in accordance with all applicable portions of Federal, NFPA, and Local regulations. TANK SYSTEM INFORMATION Tank Tank Product Vapor Recovery Tank Capacity Diameter Level Tank No. Gallons Inches Product Inches Material Stage I Stage II i 10,000 93 UNLEADED / 72.00 STEEL COAX BALANCE 2 10,000 93 SUPER ~/ 68.00 STEEL COAX BALANCE 3 550 47 WASTE OIL $ 37.00 STEEL N/A N/A TESTING RESULTS VPLT Wetted Vent & Leak Leak Volume Portion Ullage Vapor Product Detector Detector Tank Change of Tank Test Lines Lines Present? Results No. (gph) Pass/fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Yes/no Pass/Fail i 0.032 PASS PASS PASS PASS YES PASS 2 0.005 PASS PASS PASS PASS YES PASS 3 -0.031 PASS PASS PASS N/A NDE appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call an3, time. day or night, when you need us. NDE Customer Service Representative Testing conducted by S. ROBINSON :, /~ K. HILLARY Reviewed by / Technician certification no.: B~jamin Alicea 95-1191 T~tDate: 24 Feb 1993 Work Order#: 911289 TANK TESTING DATA Product: UNLEADED SUPER WASTE OI True Capacity-gal: 10,000 10,000 550 Manifolded tanks: NO NO NO Manifolded Vents: NO NO NO Tank Bottom to top of fill-in: 126 126 80 Fill pipe length-in: 33 33 33 Tank diameter-in: 93 93 47 Tank Bottom to top of grade-in: 130 130 85 Fill pipe diameter-in 4 4 4 Fluid Level-in: 72.00 68.00 37.00 Fluid Volume-gal: 8,307 7,835 503 Water in tank-in: 0 0 0 Specific Gravity: 0.735 0.760 0,925 Tank Construction: STEEL STEEL STEEL OFT/UFT: UFT UFT UFT No. thermistor: 5 5 5 Ground Water level-in 0 0 0 How determined: WELL WELL WELL Test start time: 09:31 09:39 10:43 : : : Test finish time: 12:15 11:44 12:46 : : : Total temperature change (degrees F): 0.033 0.072 0.045 Total fluid level change (inches): -0.000 0.002 0.026 Leak Rate (GPH): 0.032 0.005 -0.031 Pass/Fail: II PASS PASS PASS NDE Volumetric Tank Test Method: VPLT-A System NDE Envirom~enta| Corporation - 20000 Mariner Avenue Ste 500 -Torrance, CA. 90503 - (310) 542-4342 Page I T~tDate: 24 Feb 1993 WorkOrde~: 911289 ULLAGE TESTING DATA Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Product: UNLEADED SUPER WASTE OI True Capacity-gal: 10,000 10,000 550 Ullage volume-gal: 1,693 2,165 47 Fluid pressure on tank bottom(psi): 1.80 1.80 1.20 Ullage test pressure: 2.2 2.2 2.8 Stabilization time: 10 10 10 Fill start time: 12:00 12:55 08:20 : : : Time to 1 PSI: 03 58 22 Time to test pressure: 05 00 25 Start time - test 1: 12:15 13:10 08:35 : : : Nitrogen flow (cfh): 0.20 0.20 0.20 Ullage temperature-F: 61.9 61.7 66.9 Finish time - test 1: 12:25 13:20 08:45 : : Nitrogen flow (cfh): 0.20 0.20 0.20 Start time - test 2: 12:25 13:20 08:45 Nitrogen flow (cfh): 0.20 0.20 0.20 Ullage temperature: 61.7 61.4 66.2 Finish time - test 2: 12:35 13:30 08:55 : Nitrogen flow (cfh): 0.10 0.20 0.20 Start time - test 3: 12:35 13:30 08:55 : : : Nitrogen flow (cfh): 0.10 0.20 0.10 Ullage temperature-F: 61.7 61.5 66.2 Finish time - test 3: 12:45 13:40 09:05 : Nitrogen Flow (cfh): 0.10 0.20 0.10 Pass/Fail: PASS PASS PASS I ULLAGE TEST COMMENTS: Ullage lest method: UTS - 4T Non-Vohm~eu'i¢ NOTE: [ 2 consecutive test @ < 0.275 constitute a PASS ] [ 3 consecutive test @ > 0.275 constitute a FAlL ] NDE Environmental Co~omtion - 20000 Ma,'iner Avenue Ste 500 -Torrance, CA. 90503 - (3 IQ 542-4342 ~ge 2 T~tDate: 24 Feb 1993 Work Order: 911289 LINE TEST DATA Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Product: UNLEADED SUPER WASTE OIL Pump type: PRESSURE PRESSURE Pump Make: TOKHEIM TOKHEIM Isolator: BULLET BULLET Line Material: :STEEL STEEL Line Length (ft): 20 20 Line Diameter (in): 2 2 Test pressure (psi) 50 50 Bleed Back (cc): Test start time: 09:50 10:50 : : : : Time (1): 10:00 11:00 : : : : Finish PSI: 49 50 Vol Change (cc): 4 0 Time (2): 10:10 11:10 : : : : Finish PSI: 49 48 Vol Change (cc): 4 6 Time (3): 10:20 11:20 : : : : Finish PSI: 49 48 Vol Change (cc): 5 8 Volume change-GPH:ll'0.007 0.007 Pass/Fail: IIPASS PASS Line Test Method: PTK-88 Volumetric NDE Environmental Corporation - 20000 Mariner Avenue Ste 500 - Torrance. CA. 90503 - (310) 542-4342 Page 3 T~tDate: 24 Feb 1993 Work Order#: 911289 LEAK DETECTOR DATA ,I Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Serial number: i 2 3 Product: UNLEADED SUPER WASTE OIL Leak Detector manufacturer: REDJACKET REDJACKET Leak detector model: D.L.D. P.L.D. Leak detector serial number: 112913332 308899881 Open time - sec: 2 2 Element holding-psi: 21 20 Resiliency - cc: 300 300 Leak calibration-cc: 252 252 Leak Rate - GPH: 4.00 4.00 Metering PSI: 13 13 Detected Leak (Y/N): YES YES Pass/Fail: IPASS PASS FAILED LEAK DETECTORS ,,I] Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Leak Detector manufacturer: Leak detector model: Leak detector serial number: Leak Rate - GPH: Pass/Fail: ] iLEAK DETECTOR TEST COMMENTS: Leak Detector test method: Field Test Apparatus NDE Environmental Co~omtion - 20000 Mariner Avenue Ste 500 - Torrance, CA. 90503 - (310) 542-4342 Page 4 TestDate: 24 Feb 1993 Work Order# : 911289 COMMENTS SITE CONDITIONS, NECESSARY REPAIRS: ADDITIONAL WORK PERFORMED: PARTS/EQUIPMENT PROVIDED: Was lock-out/tag-out procedure used?: YES Was location fully operational upon leaving site?: YES Was a visual inspection of all submersible pumps, leak detectors, dispensers, etc. conducted while on-site?: YES Was station manager or attendant present during final inspection?: YES NDE Environmental Corporation - 20000 Mariner Avenue Sic 500 - Torrance, CA. 90503 ~ (310) 542-4342 Page 5 BA/~ERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST PEP~IT TO OPERATE ~ OPERATORS NAME ~//~0~/~_ OWNERS NAME ~BER OF T~S TO BE TESTED ~ IS PIPING GOING TO'BE 'TESTED T~ VOL~E CONTENTS TANK TESTING COMPANY~ Z~-/V~RO,~Y/~D'~I;"M~- ADDRESS / STATE REGIST~TION ~ DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED AP~~' DATE SIGNATURE' 0F APPLIC~T INVOICE NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO. PAGE oooo TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 (800) 800-4NDE FAX: (310) 542-6657 l~__~ UNOCAL 76 ?~l~ UNOCAL NO. 1367 SOLD SHIP TO: STEPHAN CAMF'BELL TO: 15(_')1 BRUNDAGE LANE 911 WILSHIRE BL: STE lC)10J AT CHESTER LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ~'~' BAKERSFIELD , CA 95504 ORDER NO. ORDER DATE CUSTOMER SALES PURCHASE NO. PERSON ORDER NO. SHIP VIA SHIP DATE TERMS 96(:)25(.' 07/16/9~ UNOCAL 31(:) B1941C 42A 07/20/9~ NET QUANTITY ORDERED ITEM NO. PRICE UNIT UNIT PRICE "' UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY SHIPPED UNIT QUANTITY BACK ORD. fiEM EXTENDED PRICE i. 0(:)( ULLAGE ULLAGE TEST EACH .5.75.00 1.00( 1 550 GALLON TANK 575.00 i. 0(1)( * PERM I T COST EACFI 40. (1)0 1.0 0 ( 4 0.0 0 SALES AMOUNT 4 1 5.00 MISC. CHARGES . O('.) FREIGHT . SALES TAX . REMIT TO: NDE ENVlRONMENTAJ. CORP. ATTN: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TOTAL ,~ 1.5.00 20000 MARINER AVE., SUITE 500 PAYMENT REC'D TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 BALANCE DUE SUMMARY OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING NDE NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION E 20000 Mariner Avenue, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 {310) 542-4342 Date: July 21, 1992 Test Date: ?120/92 UNOCAL 76 UNOCAL #1367 STEPHAN CAMPBELL 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE 911 WlLSHIRE BL, STE 1010 BAKERSFIELD, CA LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 Work Order No. 960250 The following tests were conducted at the site described above in accordance with all applicable portions of federal, NFPA, state, and local regulations and codes. TANK SYSTEM INFORMATION Vapor Tank Tank Tank Product Tank Recovery No. Capacity Diameter Product Level Material Type TESTING RESULTS VPLT Wetted Ullage Vent & Leak Leak Volume Portion Portion Product Vapor Detector Detector Tank Change of Tank of Tank Lines Lines Present? Results No. (gph) Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Yes/No Pass/Fail 1 N/A N/A FAIL N/A N/A N/A N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NDE appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call any time, day or night, when Vou need us. NDE Customer Service Representative Testing conducted by Frank Miller Jeff Conger License No. 93-1116 NDE Proprietary. Not to be copied, duplicated, or distributed without the express written permission of NDE Environmental Corporation. NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Avenue. Suite 500. Torrance. California 90503-1670 (310~ 842-4342 · (800) 800-4NDE · FAX (310~ 542-6657 PAGE 1 TESTING SUMMARY WORK OROER NUMBER: 960250 SALES REPRESENTATIVE: FRANK MILLER TEST DATE: 7120/92 TEST START TIME: UNKNOWN TECH(S) JEFF LONGER VAN NUMBER: S42 SITE NAME: UNOCAL ,1367 VAN MILEAGE: UNKNOWN SITE ADDRESS: 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE OIL CHECK: NO BAKERSFIELD, CA TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE SITE PHONE: 805-325-4141 OTHER NDE PERSONNEL CLINTON COLLIER SITE ID NUMBER: TECHNICIAN 93-1116 CERTIFICATION NUMBER: NDE Proprlet~-y. No~ to be copied, duplicated,' or distributed without the e~pr~ss writ~ permission of NDE Environmental Corporation. ULLAGE TESTING DATA Page 2 NDE utilizes the UTS-4T Ullage Testing Syitem for all precision ullage tests. This .ytem meet~ or exceeds all federal. ,tats. and local regulatory requirements for precision underground storage tank testing. .... tpYOduct .............................................................................................. wASTE OIL NDE Proprietary. Not to be copied, duplicated, or distributed without the express wr;i~en permission of NDE Environmental Corporation. Page 3 _C_O_ M E NTS AFTER TESTING THIS SYSTEM FOR 3 + TESTS, WITH EACH TEST EXCEEDING + 1.0 CFH, THE CONTAINMENT BOX WAS REMOVED AND THIS SYSTEM WAS AGAIN TESTED. THERE WAS NO CHANGE IN THE RESULTS. THERE IS STILL AN APPARENT LEAK SOMEWHERE WITHIN THIS SYSTEM WHICH NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. NDE Proprietary. Not to be eopled, duplicated, or distributed without the express written permission of NDE Envlronme~tal Corporation. CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. O. JOHNSON June 15, 199 2 BAKERSFIELD. 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Unocal Corporation 911 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Stephan~Campbell Re: Results for line tightness tests performedat the Unocal Station.#1367 located at 1501 Brundage Lane, Bakersfield CA; permit # BT0032 Dear Mr. Campbell, Results for the tank tests conducted at the above stated facility revealed that the product line associated with tank No.1 was not certified tight. Please inform this office of the status of this failed line, including any work performed on the line to correct the problem. Additionally, be advised that any corrective action that involves cutting, replacing and/or excavating the line must be done under a modification permit. Please submit the results within twenty (20) days from receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3797. Hazardous Material Specialist Underground Tank Program BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION'TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS.TEST TANK~ VOLUME CONTENTS TANK TESTING COMPANY ~/ZQ~-~~&~/b~/~/;~DDRESS TEST METHOD ~/OZ~ /OOO ~,/FP/Z STATE REGIST~TION 9 DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED /t KPPROVE~Y. - SIGNATURE OF APPLIC~ CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM INTEGRITY NDE ENVIRONNI!a~AL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4342 WORK ORD ~: 960037 SALES REP: FRANK MILLER CLIENT: UNOCAL CORPORATION LOCATION: ~NOCAL SERVICE STATION $1367 911 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 BAKERSFIELD ,CA. 93304 805 325 4141 ATTN: STEPHAN CAMPBELL TEST DATE: 04/21/1992 CERTIFICATION DATE: 04/21/1992 The following underground storage tank system tests were conducted in accordance with the applicable portions of NFPA Title 329, 40 CFR 280.43(c), and 40 CFR 280.44(b) and state and local regulations. TANK DESCRIPTION Tk Tank I.D. Product Capacity Diameter Level Tank No. Description Gallons Inches Inches Material 1 10K UNL 87 UNLEADED 87 10000.0 95.00! 75.00 UNKNOWN 2 10K SUP 92 S/UNLEADED 92 10000.0 95.001 84.00 UNKNOWN 3 4 5 6 7 8 TEST RESULTS Tk VPLT FLUID TEST PRODUCT LINE LEAK DETECTOR ULLAGE No. GPH PASS/FAIL GPH PASS/FAIL PRESENT PASS/FAIL PERFORMED PASS/FAIL i ~-0.037 PASS +0.103 FAIL YES 'PASS YES PASS 2 -0.014 PASS +0.000 PASS YES PASS YES PASS 3 4 5 6 7 8 Name of Tester Certif¥inq Results: JOHN JERSEY Tester's License ~: 92-1443 Repairs\Replacements\Comments: *NOTE* SUPER/UNLEADED '92'. THE LEAK DETECTOR "FAILED" AS DID THE LINE TEST. NDE TECHNICIAN REPLACED THE LEAK DETECTOR ($3332) AND RE-TESTED. THE LINE TEST STILL FAILED. CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patent Pending STAT # UNOCAL 1367 SUMMAR~REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK $ 10KUNL 87 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 PAGE 1 1. Owner of Storage Tanks UNOCAL CORPORATION Company Representative STEPHAN CAMPBELL Title TANK TEST COORDINATOR 2. Mailing Address of Owner 911 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 3. Phone of Owner 4. Station Number UNOCAL 1367 5. Location Name for Tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION $1367 Location Address for Tanks 1501 BRUNDAOELANE BJ%KERSFIELD ,CA. 9330& Location phone number 805 325 4141 Location operator UNOCAL CORPORATION 6. Regulatory Agency STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7. Tank designation or ID $ 10KUNL 87 8. Date tank was tested Apr 21, 1992 9. Precision Test Performed NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM Name of Testing Company NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Mailing Address of Testing 20000 MARINER AVENUE, SUITE 500 Company TORRANCE, CA 90503 Phone of Testing Company (310) 542-43~2 10. Technician Conducting Test JOHN JERSEY Test Certified by JOHN JERSEY License Number 92-1~43 11. Tank Capacity 10000 Gallons 12. Tank Construction Material UNKNOWN 13. Testing Liquid UNLEADED 87 14. The test was performed at ,IN-TANK (UFT)/ULLAGE The system PASSED with a leak uate of -0.037 Gallons/Hour. Allowable leak'resolution of i~strumentation or allowable change is in accordance with applicable portions of National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329, 40 CFR 280.43(c), and 40 CFR 280.44(b). 15.Product Line Pressure Test was performed. Product Line Pressure Test 16. Leak Detector Inspection was performed. The Leak Detectors were found to be operational. 17. Additional Information regarding this test: **NOTE** THE LEAK DETECTOR "FAILED" AS DID THE LINE TEST. NDE TECHNICIAN REPLACED THE LEAK DETECTOR ($3332) AND RE-TESTED. THE LINE TEST STILL FAILED. NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) Syst~ Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd>0.95/Pfa<0.05; 0.10gph = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PREC N UNDERGROUND TANK TESTINGRE Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK # 10KUNL 87 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 '~ PAGE 2 PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA Tank Owner .................... = UNOCAL CORPORATION Tank Number ................... = IOKUNL 87 Measurement # 24 Test Date = Apr 21, 1992 Measurement Time = 16:43 Tank Temperature .............. = 73.8421 degrees F Tank Pressure ................. = -0.0000 psi Basic Test Volume ************* = 8467.956 Gallons Temperature Correction ******** = 80.327 Gallons Pressure Correction *********** = -0.000 Gallons Corrected Volume ************** = 8548.283 Gallons Stratified Corrected Volume *** = 8550.144 Gallons Total Fluid Level ............. = 75.0008 inches Fluid Pressure on Tank Bottom = 1.9781 psi Leak Rate Calculation Time ..... = 01:00:38 Geometry Band ................. = 0.00008 Gallons/Hour Avg Volume Change ............. = 0.01818 Gallons Avg Measured Level Change ..... = 0.00056 Inches Avg Expected Level Change ..... = 0.00017 Inches Avg Apparent Leak ............. = -0.04229 Gallons Avg Apparent Leak Rate ........ = -0.03673 Gallons/Hour COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE DATA D.Og D.O6 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ( PROPRIETARY ) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd>0.95/Pfa<0.05; 0.10gph = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 NarJner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4342 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRE ON UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING T Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK # 10KUNL 87 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 ~ PAGE 3 1. Tank Capacity 10000 Gallons 2. Present or Past Contents UNLEADED 87 3. Testing Liquid UNLEADED 87 4. Tank Construction Material UNKNOWN 5. a. Tank Inclination 0.0 degrees b. Fill Pipe Inclination 0.0 degrees 6. a. Internal diameter of Tank 95.000 Inches b. Tank Bottom to Grade Level 122.000 Inches 7. a. Fill Pipe Internal Diameter 4.000 Inches b. Fill Pipe Length 32.000 Inches c. Top of Fill Pipe to Tank Bottom 0.000 Inches d. Top of Fill Pipe to Grade Level 122.000 Inches Below Grade Level 8. Number of Air Vents 1 9. Type of Fill Pipe Cap CAMLOCK 10. Type of Pumps associated TURBINE with the appurtenant piping 11. Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 0.0005853 volumetric coefficient of expansion/deg F 12. Specific Gravity 0.730 13. Bulk Modulus 188000.0 14. Type of Phase II Vapor BALANCE Recovery System 15. Depth of Groundwater 122.000 Inches Below Grade Level 16. Date and Time Storage PRIOR TO TEST Tank System was Topped Off for Testing 17. Total Product Level 75.000 Inches From Tank Bottom 18. General Notes and Log Entries: NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ( PROPRIETARY ) Syste~ Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.0$gph =Pd>0.9$/Pfa<0.05; 0.109pa = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE E#VIRON#E#TAL CORPORATION 20000 #ariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4342 CAPACITY 10000 Gal P~ECI$IONUNDERGROUND TANK TESTING ~E~T Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK # IOKUNL 87 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 ~ PAGE 4 1. TOTAL TEST CONDUCTION TIME - 02~35:42 Hours 2. Data Collection Interval: a) Start 14:33 Hours b) End 17:09 Hours (Calculated leak rate based on measurements during final hour of test. 3. Test was performed with fluid 47.000 Inches Below Grade Level 4. Test was conducted at 5. Contaminating water level = 0.000 Inches PRODUCT LINE PRESSURE TEST - PRESSURE DATA 6. Product Line Pressure Test Conducted? YES 7. Initial System Pressure 50.000 PSI 8. Pressure drop (if any) during test 50.00000 PSI 9. Elapsed test time 10.000 Minutes 10. Product Line Pressure Test Leak Rate 0.10300 Gallons/Hour 11. Turbine pump activated? NO 12. Full system test was not conducted. VAPOR POCKET EVALUATION 14. Was there evidence of vapor pockets? NO 15. Was the owner notified of additional procedures necessary to release trapped vapor in order to complete the test? N/A NDE ENVIRON~NTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIET~Y) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.~0gph = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, CaLifornia 90503 (310)542~45&2 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECI~rIONUNDERGROUND TANK TESTINe RE~T Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK ~ IOKUNL 87 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 ~ PAGE 5 COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF AVERAGE TEMPERATURE COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF FLUID LEVEL I'- ~- r- r- r- r- 1-- r- r- i--- i--- i'-- I .--0.01~ .--0.010 ..-'0.0191 ~.Olg2 :-O.01g~ ..-0.0t8& .--0.01~5 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ( PROPRIETARY ) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.059ph =Pd>0.95/Pfa<0.05; 0.10gph = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 #ariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patent Pending STAT $ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK $ 10K SUP 92 ~' WORK ORDER 96003? TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 PAGE 1 1. Owner of Storage Tanks UNOCAL CORPORATION Company Representative STEPHAN CAMPBELL Title TANK TEST COORDINATOR 2. Mailing Address of Owner 911 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 3. Phone of Owner 4. Station Number UNOCAL 1367 5. Location Name for Tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION $1367 Location Address for Tanks 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD ,CA. 93304 Location phone number 805 325 4141 Location operator UNOCAL CORPORATION 6. Regulatory Agency STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7. Tank designation or ID $ 10K SUP 92 8. Date tank was tested Apr 21, 1992 9. Precision Test Performed NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM Name of Testing Company NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Mailing Address of Testing 20000 MARINER AVENUE, SUITE 500 Company TORRANCE, CA 90503 Phone of Testing Company (310) 542-4342 10. Technician Conducting Test JOHN JERSEY Test Certified by JOHN JERSEY License Number 92-1443 11. Tank Capacity 10000 Gallons 12. Tank Construction Material UNKNOWN 13. Testing Liquid S/UNLEADED 92 14. The test was performed at IN-TANK (UFT)/ULLAGE The system PASSED with a leak rate of -0.014 Gallons/Hour. Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable change is in accordance with applicable portions of National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329, 40 CFR 280.43(c), and 40 CFR 280.44(b). 15. Product Line Pressure Test was performed. Product Line Pressure Test passed. 16. Leak Detector Inspection was performed. The Leak Detectors were found to be operational. 17. Additional Information regarding this test: NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd~0.95/Pfa,0.05; 0.10gph = Pd~0.99/Pfa,0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORAT%OH 20000 Nariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4342 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RE~T Patent Pending STAT # UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK # 10K SUP 92 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 ~ PAGE 2 PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA Tank Owner .................... = UNOCAL CORPORATION Tank Number ................... = 10K SUP 92 Measurement ~ 23 Test Date = Apr 21, 1992 Measurement Time = 16~46 Tank Temperature .............. = 73.2781 degrees F Tank Pressure ................. = -0.0000 psi Basic Test Volume ************* = 9354.852 Gallons Temperature Correction ******** = 80.778 Gallons Pressure Correction *********** = -0.000 Gallons Corrected Volume ************** = 9435.629 Gallons Stratified Corrected Volume *** = 9436.354 Gallons Total Fluid Level ............. = 84.0024 inches Fluid Pressure on Tank Bottom = 2.2611 psi Leak Rate Calculation Time ..... = 01:02:28 Geometry Band ................. = 0.00260 Gallons/Hour Avg Measured Level Change ..... = 0.00250 Inches Avg Strat Volume Change ******* = 0.16753 Gallons Avg Strat Expected Level Change = 0.00203 Inches Avg Strat Apparent Leak ******* = -0.01605 Gallons Avg Strat Apparent Leak Rate ** = -0.01377 Gallons/Hour COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE DATA NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.05gph =Pd~,0.95/Pfac0.05; 0.10gp~ = Pd~0.99/Pfac0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 #ariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, Cat~forn~a 90503 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RE~T Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK ~ 10K SUP 92 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 ~ PAGE 3 1. Tank Capacity 10000 Gallons 2. Present or Past Contents S/UNLEADED 92 3. Testing Liquid S/UNLEADED 92 4. Tank Construction Material UNKNOWN 5. a. Tank Inclination 0.0 degrees b. Fill Pipe Inclination 0.0 degrees 6. a. Internal diameter of Tank 95.000 Inches b. Tank Bottom to Grade Level 122.000 Inches 7. a. Fill Pipe Internal Diameter 4.000 Inches b. Fill Pipe Length 32.000 Inches c. Top of Fill Pipe to Tank Bottom 0.000 Inches d. Top of Fill Pipe to Grade Level ~22.000 Inches Below Grade Level 8. Number of Air Vents 1 9. Type of Fill Pipe Cap CAMLOCK 10. Type of Pumps associated TURBINE with the appurtenant piping 11. Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 0.0006503 volumetric coefficient of expansion/deg F 12. Specific Gravity 0.745 13. Bulk Modulus 188000.0 14. Type of Phase II Vapor BALANCE Recovery System 15. Depth of Groundwater 122.000 Inches Below Grade Level 16. Date and Time Storage PRIOR TO TEST Tank System was Topped Off for Testing 17. Total Product Level 84.000 Inches From Tank Bottom 18. General Notes and Log Entries: NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) Syst~ Accuracy (Staxlard Tank): O.05gl~ =Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gp~ = P~O.99/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENV%RONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Nariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4~42 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patent Pending STAT ~UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK # 10K SUP 92 c WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 PAGE 4 1. TOTAL TEST CONDUCTION TIME - 02~05:11 Hours 2. Data Collection Interval~ a) Start 14=41 Hours b) End 16=46 Hours (Calculated leak rate based on measurements during final hour of test. 3. Test was performed with fluid 38.000 Inches Below Grade Level 4. Test was conducted at 5. Contaminating water level = 0.000 Inches PRODUCT LINE PRESSURE TEST - PRESSURE DATA 6. Product Line Pressure Test Conducted? YES 7. Initial System Pressure 50.000 PSI 8. Pressure drop (if any) during test 0.00000 PSI 9. Elapsed test time 10.000 Minutes 10. Product Line Pressure Test Leak Rate 0.00000 Gallons/Hour 11. Turbine pump activated? NO 12. Full system test was not conducted. VAPOR POCKET EVALUATION 14. Was there evidence of vapor pockets? N° 15. Was the owner notified of additional procedures necessary to release trapped vapor in order to complete the test? N/A NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd>0.95/Pfa<0.05; 0.10gph = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENV%RON#ENTAL CORPORAT%ON 20000 NarJner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310)542-4342 CAPACITY 10000 Gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTINGRES~T Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 1367 SUMMARY REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1991 TANK ~ 10K SUP 92 WORK ORDER 960037 TEST DATE: Apr 21, 1992 c PAGE 5 COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF AVERAGE TEMPERATURE COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF FLUID LEVEL .--0.007 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ( PROPRIETARY ) System Accuracy (Standard Tank): 0.05gph =Pd>0.95/Pfa<0.05; 0.10gp~ = Pd>0.99/Pfa<0.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPONATION :~0000 Nariner Ave, Suite 500 Torrance, Catifornia 90503 AN ESOP, COMPANY ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH MoDOWELL BOULEVARD · PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 9495~-1469 (707) 765-1660 Ma.Hing Address: P.O. Box 7509OIB, Petaluma, CA 94975-0908 Fax (707) 765-9908 March 16, 1993 JOHN W. JOHNSON Ralph Huey RECEIVED Architect Bakersfield Fire Department ~OH,,,..,c,,~ 2130 G Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~-~v~,,, .,. ,,,,'n-,,,~, " HAZ b!AT. DIV. ArchitectCEClL FI. SPENCER SUBMIsSioN OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS AND RELATED a^~,~s .. ,~¥ DOCUMENTS Civil Engineer D~ar Ralph }lucy: · On behalf of Unocal Corporation, Robert H. Lee & Associates, Inc. (RHL) has been selected as the contractor to prepare the HMMP documents for the Unocal 'facilities listed on the attached. RHL requests your cooperation in managing our schedule. RHL requests that you grant us. April 30, 1993 as the deadline tbr these submissions. If you require an alternate deadline, please indicate this below. RHL' understands that your agency requires only an update of the HMMP currently on file and that the Underground Storage Tank Monitoring Plans on file are current. Please sign the Acknowledgement of Receipt and return it to: Ms. Marion K. Miller, Robert H. Lee'& Associat. es, Inc. 1137 N. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954. 4'/.~ddress all future invoices and corres;ondence to: Mr. Bill' Arbogast, Hazard0us~ _ I ,~q~'( Materials Compliance Coordinator, Unocal Corporation. 911 Wilshire Blvd., llth Floor, Los ~ br k,~ngeles, CA 90017. You Can reach Mir. Arbogast at 2i3-977-7850. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES. !NC._ . Mar,~)n K. Miller · ~ Pr°J e~ager . . -- 'Date: '~ CC: MI'. Bill Arbogast, Unocal l~ MARIETTA, GA SACRAMENTO, CA BELLEVUE, WA ' LA'HA;BRA, CA 23-Mar-93 AT BAKERSFIELD Page 1 Nolan W. Berst Nolan W. Berst ~! ~ James D. Summers 1501Brundage Lane 2699 Mt. Vernon 5401Stockdale Highway Bakersfield Bakersfield Bakersfield CA 93304 ,' CA 93306 CA 93309 55~ 5~ 6089 7048 Steve Es[ayed Country Club Union, Inc. Mike D. Mfng 2502 Ning Avenue 2524 Os.el[ Street 3S--~ 2518 .hire Lane 8akersfietd 8akersfietd aakersfietd CA 93304 0~ CA 93306 CA 93304 ~anie[ L. Morgan (envirocom) 8200-A Stockdale Hwy. Bakersfield CA 93311 .~~ _HAZARDOUS, MATERIALS DIVISION . ~ 2130 G Street', Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~~'¢i~ ....~.~ (805) 326-3970 / RE 1\,~9 . UNDERGROUND TANK QUE~T-i~NNAIRE I. FACILI~/SITE No. OF TANKS '7 . HAZ. MAT. DIV. D~ OR FACILIW NAME ~ NAME ~ OPE~TOE ADDRE~ ~ N~R~T C~ S~E~ PARCEL No.(OP~ONAD Cl~ NAME STATE ZIP CODE -' EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMAR~ EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDA~ DAYS: NAME (~ST, FI~ PHONE ~. WI~ AR~ CODE DAYS: NAME (~$T. FI~ PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE NIGHTS: NAME (~SL FI~S~ PHONE ~. WI~ AE~ CODE NIGH~: NAME (~ST, FI~ PHONE ~. W~ AR~ II. PROPER~ OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME CARE OF ADDRE~ IN~RMATION MAILING OR STRE~ AODRE~ ~ BOX ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY IlL TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME [ CA~E OF AODRE~ INFORMATION MAILING O~ STREET ADDRESS .~ ~OX ~ INDIVIOUAL ~ ~OCAL AGENCY CI~ NAME ' ~ STATE ~ ZiP CODE ~ PHONE No. WITH AE~ CODE OWNER'S DATE VOLUME PRODUCT IN TANK No. INSTALLED STORED SERVICE Y/N YIN YIN YIN DO YOU HAVE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY? 'Y~-~ TYPE I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ""'~'~EMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN I A. OWNER'S TANK ,. D., ~'.~"'/. ~ oo-'~ ~,~) -o~ ~ ~b ~. ~,.u~,c~.~o ~K~ ~ II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEI~MONLY~NeOXES~a, ANDC.~DALL~ATAP~IESlNeOXO A. ~PE OF ~ 1 ~UaLE WA~ ~ 3 SINGLE W~ wl~ E~ERIOR LINER ~5 UN~OWN SYSTEM ~ 2 SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY ~NTAINME~ (VAUL~DTAN~ ~ ~ O~ER B. TANK ~ 1 ~RE STEEL ~ 2 STNNLESS S~EL · ~ 3 FlaERG~S ~ 4 STEEL C~D Wl FIBERG~ REINFORCED P~C MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 ~L~INYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ~UMINUM ~ 8 I~ ME~ANOL ~MPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) ~ 9 BRON~ ~ 10 ~VANI~D S~ ~ ~ UN~OWN ~ ~ O~ER ~ I RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ~O L~G ~ 3 ~O~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOL~ LINING C, INTERIOR ' UNING ~ 5 ~ LINING ~ 6 UNLIN~ ~ ~ UN~WN ~ ~ O~ER ;S UNING MATERIAL ~MPATIBLE Wl~ 1~ ME~ANOL ? YES~ NO~ D. CORROSION ~ 1 ~L~LENE W~ ~ 2 ~A~ ~ 3 VI~L ~ ~ 4 FIBERG~S REINFORCED ~S~C PROTEC~0N, ~ 5 CA~ODIC PROTECTION ~ 91 ~NE ~ UN~WN . ~ '~ O~ER IV. PIPING INFORMATION cmc~ A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BO~IF~LICA~ A. SYSTEM~PE A U i SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 G~VI~ A U ~ O~ER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WA~ A U 2 ~UBLE WA~ A U 3 LINED TR~CH A U ~UN~OWN A U ~ O~ER C. MA~RIAL AND A U 1 ~RE STEEL A U 2 STNNLESS S~EL A U 3 ~LWI~L CHLORIOE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERG~S PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ~UMINUM A U 6 ~NCRE~ A U 7 ST~LW/~A~NG A U 8 1~ ME~NoL ~UPA~a~W~RP · PROTE~ION A U g ~LVANI~D S~ A U 10 CA~OOICPROTECTION A U UN~O~ A U ~ O~ER D. LEAK D~ECTION ~ 1 AUTOMA~CLINELEAKOE~CTOR ~ 2 LINE T~H~ESS TESTING ~ 3 I~S~L ~Nff0R~NG ~ ~ O~ER V. TANK LEAK D~ECTION ~ ~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 IN~NTORY RE~NClLIAT'O" ~ 3VAPORMONITORING~ 4 ~OMATICTANK~UGING~ 5 GROUND WA~R MONITORINGI ~ s TANK TESTING ~ 7 IN~RSTmAL.ONiTORING ~ 91 ~NE ~' 95 UNGOWN ~ ~ O~EH I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. O. # ~ B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. CATE iNSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) O. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANCALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] I DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4, SECONCARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B. TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD WI FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORICE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (Prirnary?ankl [] a BRONZE [] 10 C-.~ALYANIZED STEEL [] gs UNKNOWN [] ag OTHER [] 1 RUBBER L,.Ec [] 2 AU~O L,.,.G [] ~ EPO~ .,.,.G [] . ..ENOL~ .,.,.G C. INTERIOR [] s GLASS LINING · [] S UNLINED [] aS UNKNOWN '~----~ ~ OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL?' YES~ NO~ O. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2' COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION E]]] s CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] as UNKNOWN [] ga OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RC,~ A IFABOVEGROUNOOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND · A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORICE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEWlFRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] ! AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK OETECTOR [~] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL ~NITORtNG [~ 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ~ , viSUAL CHECK [] 2 '"~NTORY RECO.C,L,AT'O" []3 VA.OR MO.,TOR'"G F--l. ~TOMAT,C TA.K GAUG,NG [] . GROUND WA~"'~ON,TOR,.G ~ G TANK TESTING [] ? ,NTERSTITIALMONITORING [] al NoNE [] a5 UNKNOWN [] g~J OTHER I, TANK O ESCRIPTION COMPLET~ '~m'~EMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: IlL TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ~TEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANOC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESlNBOXD A. TYPE OF [] I DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULI~DTANK) [] 9~ OTHER · B.. TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL · [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] $ POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP · (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] .99 OTHER [] RUSBER L,NEO [] 2 L..G []'3 [] 4 PHE.OL": LI.,NG C. INTERIOR LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] S UNLINED [] 95 uNKNOwN [] 99 OTHER IS uNING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES~ NO~ D, CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] '3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION, [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IPAI~OVEGROUND'OR U IFUNOERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICAaLE A, SYSTEM TYPE A IJ 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U '1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH ,~ U 95 UNKNOWN A IJ 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS S'i'I-'EL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM ,~ U 6 CONCRETE ,& U 7 STEEL WI COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D, LEAK DETECTION [] I AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION I [] 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER I. TANK D ESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN · A. OWNER'S TANK I. D, # B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D; TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B, TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL ' ~[] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] S 10(~/° METHANOL COMPATIBLEWIFRP (PrimaryTank) [] g BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 9g OTHER [] RUBSER L,NED [] 2 L .ING [] 3 EPO LINING [] PHENOL L,NING C. INTERIOR LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO~ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING ~ 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 90 OTHER IV, PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUNO. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U g9 OTHER C, MATERIAL AND ' A t~ 1 BARESTEEL A U ~' STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL Wl COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODiC PROTECTION A U g5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D, LEAK DETECTION [~] I AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 tNlrERSllTtAL MONITORING ~ 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ~ I VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGmNG [] 5 GROUNO WATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 ,NTERSTITIALMONITORING [] ~1' NONE I'~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 90 OTHER Lei LIQUID CONSTRUCTION, July 18, 1991 \~~\%~ob N~er 91-5072 RECEIVED Unocal North Div HQ PO Box 5155 JUL 3 I 1991 San Ramon, CA. 94583 Attn: Tony Yap HAZ, M^T. DIV. Re: UNOCAL SS # 1367, 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CA. Dear Tony, On June 11, 1991, a Petro Tite System Test was performed at the above-referenced location. The test was performed by George Yarbrough, LCI Technician. The NFPA Code 329.02 criteria for a tight system is a maximum loss of .05 gallons per hour. Because of the almost infinite variables involved, this is not intended to be a mathematical tolerance and is not the permission of actual leakage. During the stand-pipe test procedures the internal liquid hydrostatic, pressure applied to the underground tank system is generally two to three times greater than normal liquid storage pressures. This increase in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indicated rate of leak accordingly. SYSTEM TEST: Tank No. 3 - South Size - 550 Gallons ProduCt - Waste Oil The test showed a minus .014 gallons per hour. Based on the above criteria, we find the tank tested mathematically tight. This concludes our test findings. If you have any questions regarding the results, please contact me. For your convenience, copies of these results have been sent to the County. We have enjoyed working with you on this project. If you need any further information, please feel free to call. Tank Testing Coordinator DC/rlk enclosures Kern Coungy Environmental File 1054 North 'J' Street * Post Office Box 1220 · Tulare, California 93275 · (209) 688-1980 Chart for T;nk System Tightness Test Tank,s) TEST (E~lain Fully) 4. WHO REQUESTED TEST AND WHEN Te~ LocatiO~ ~ver Fills Vents . . ~ip~ P~ 6. INSTALLATION DATA F~o u~, ~ ~? 1~/ ' ' ' ~h ~i~ ar~ey. ~r~e. ~la~ T~. ~e. ~tefill make. ~ ~. ~[e. Rear of ~t~. ~c. Ea~. ~c. tu~. ~te F~ ~ze. ~ni~ · , , ~i~ ~nkl? ~kl ff kfl~ 7. UNDERGROUND "· WATER 8. FILL-UP ~ Tet~ ARRANGEMENTS ~., ~ ~ ~ o~... ~. ~, ~.,.,. ~..d ~ ~ ~? ~, .o L,,~. " ~ ~t~ m ~ ~, ~ To~ 9.CONTRACTOR. MECHANICS, ~d 10. OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS 11. TEST RESULTS Tank ~f~ Tight ~ika~ ~ · ~te T~t~ 12. SENSOR CERTIFICATION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~-~/- ¢/ Nsme of ~uppller, Own~ of OeIler Address bio, Ind Slreet(~) .City ' Sills Olio of TeSt 15. TANK TO TEST 15a. BRIEF DIAGRAM OF TANK FIELD 16, CAPACITY ] Stlllon Chert TSTT ASSEMBLY 21. VAPOR RECOVERY SYSiEM *~, 30' ~o, -r ,,o~..,~ .................. 30 ~. 24b. COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION : ' 24a, ~rfecled gP.I. O;IVlly Tolll qunntlly I~ R~ Volumt ~lngl ~ ) ~dromelef employed ................................... II 24C. FOR 1ES11NG WITH WATER The ,~ve celcul,(i~ ~re to ~ used f~ d~ eoll ~ndlt~ns Io lot ~vo~ved ~uct ~,b~ O ............................................. ~.~ ? . ~l~bllsh ~ ~sltNe p~essure idvenlege, or when using Ihe lout ~und F~om T~Me B ............................................. . mlelocompen~etelmlhepr~enceofeu~urf~cewalerlnlhe~ank T~n~le~COEIoUne2~. Add~f~cl~nt? ~Yes ~ T~en~lmCOEIoL~. 'E~;". full link (t6ot II) In~lvtd product per *F I ~: ' sZ?. ':ENSOR C&I, IBR&TIO# 130. HTO~OST&?TC 131. 134. '~'~PERA'I~RE: COflPEN~ATION 138. N~ VOLU~E 139. ~ I PR~SUR~ I VO~Ufl~ ff~UR~S (V) I US~ r~R (~) ,'-:'-~, ........ r ...... , ...... ,~'i-,-;;--: .... , ..... , o - ', .... ,F ................... :: ..... g ................... ~.-.~- ~ ........................ ~ ...... ~ ....... , .... ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ - ~ ~_~__~___ ~ .... ~_- ~ ....................... '/5',Z~' ~ ,/~,~ , ~' , {HO,-~?O,~.~/u ',p~~ ,~ ~.__~ ~/ ~ _ _ _ ~-j ..... ~ J ..... ~.-- ,--L-~_.J .... ~ ..... ,~'~:s[¢~ ........................ :_Z~__:~_~_:__L~L__: '~_',2A4~:~ o r o ',~IP~-~-- _~_~__:~_9~_%__ ~11 . .., .... . ....... , .................................... ~_~___ z~J---~ ......................... u___,~L__~ .............. e~ ........ ~ ...... ~- .~ ~ ~/~ ~0~ ~ o / '~00~ , !~__Z: ........................ :J:~__',~gx_J__;_;z .... :.:~9_',.:_{~_~_'.~uL :~ 9_ D2~_A_.',~:_~_~_~__ :Z~!)_C .......................... ',_~5~',)~Z__L_:~L_L2~_L:~C:_~_:,5~ :Z~o ,,~oo~ : '-/ .... f ................ ~ .......... '--~-7-- ' ........ ' ........ ~ ....... ~--~-~-~} %---'~-~-~ ~'-~E' i y--~--- t .... ~--~-, -~ .............. ,~_~ .... f' -'-~ ............ ---r- --I ................ t ............. ,~U.'~co.~.u~.~o.~sv~s~s~. ~ -~ ~I~.¢' ' ~" ' J~' '~O'~00~ .... '-'~ ~00.~ ,~ -~ - - , :~_:~ ............................... ~__~:__, _~___v ................ ~ ..... ~_e: .... : ..... ~--, ~ 2_~, %J_~ .... ~ .... ~ ........ '/q',¢~ ' >~ 'z~,O ' '~' ' ~0' -~'!:oou ' ~t/'~l~ ,~Oo~ ,~o0~ ,--oo3 ')¢t~, '~/ '[g.o ' ,,- ,~o,.z~e,,~ooO:~..,+t~ ,/) .o~ '~-'¢x.o ' '=' , ~o,.'.~o,~.0¢¢ ,,,~¢~ ,~o~ ,~.~¢ ,~/A ~-~--.=-, ............................ ,-~-~- ,--a--~--- ~ ........ , ..... f ........ c ,~-~- ~-L~___ ,_~.__~__, ..... ~ .... ~___ j__i____~__~___ ~?~ ___~ ,..,, ,.-.~, ,.-,,~,., .... -,....., ,.,,,., .... ,, ,,. et Conclusion ,/ pern~ss:on of a Zeak. lose ot pr~uct to the envir~nment. ~ ~~ _ ,,,...,,--,..,,.,.,.,.._,.,,. .,.(>//// ,,, ...... ,o, ,.,.. · ,,. ,.., ,,,., ...... ., ..... ,,~ ,o ,,. / --. / · Jobsite Location Uy~o~{, t~/~ JOBSITE DESCRIPTION ...: ~1 Noe~ ~) toeoo~ _ = Fill ...... Vapor Drop ~2 ~c~., ~7 Iorooo ~ = Turbine oo00 = Vents 03 ~o~ ~. o,'~,. ~-0 [~ = Extractor Valve ~- Monitor System ~4 [ - ( ~ = Syphon System ~5 , ,, ~ Hiscel laneogs SITE & TANK EVALUATION TANK & ASSOC. ,EQUIPMENT , TANK #1 TANK.,,#2 TANK #3 TANK #4 TANK #5 TANK #6 DOUBLEWALL EXT~CTOa ~o OVERSPILL DISPENSER MONITORING s~c~o~ s~s~ VISIBLE LEAK /V 0~./~- V~0SE WELLS IN T~K PIT AREA :.', COUNTS Jobsite location .L//k//2.c,~ ~ {.y/~ ~ .... Job #, ~/--f~ Z~ , Signature ~~ ~ Date_g --//--Cf , COMPLETION OF WORK STATEMENT ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID CONTRACT BETWEEN FHEMCO CONSTRUCTION AND \;(/;/ e~-'~-~/~,q~'f HAVE BEEN COMPL£TED SATISFACTORILY. COMPLETED, -' O~F~rT~6nt' WORK WAS INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY \~'£~V~'~7'~-.~/~///-y INSPECTION OF Owner~Agenf ' ' '.," COMPLETED WORK WAS WITNESSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION FOREMAN .O.~i?.FHE~CO CONSTRUCTION DATE: ~ -- //-- ~/' CONSTRUCT~ FOREMAN FHEMCO . DATE: ITEMS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED ACCORDING TO SAID CONTRACT BETWEEN FHEMCO CONSTRUCTION AND Owner/Agent 1. Date CompleCed 2. Date Completed 3. Date Completed 4. Date Completed 5. Date Compl~'ted ALL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED SATISFACTORILY AS SPECIFIED IN SAID CONTRACT BETWEEN FHEMCO CONSTRUCTION AND Owner/Agent DATE: CONSTRUCTION FOREMAN-FHEMCO DATE: O~NER/AG~N? ....... PoiI Office Nx ~ - TU~RE, ~ 93275-.0088 SUMMARY OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 20000 Mariner Avenue, Suite 500 Torrance, California 90503 (310) 542-4342 Test Date: ~9 Se~992 Work Order#: 96043~ UNOC~ 76 UNOC~J., #1367 911 WILSHIRE BLVD. 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE LOS ~GELES ~ CA 90017 BAKERSFZELD ~ CA 93304 Attn: STEPI-IJ~ C~PBELL The following tests were conducted at the site described above in accordance with all applicable portions of federal, NFPA, and local regulations. TANK SYSTEM INFORMATION Vapor Tank Tank Tank Product Tank Recovery No. Capacity Diameter Product Level Material Type 550 W/O 550 45 W/OIL 29.00 STEEL NO~E TESTING RESULTS VPLT Wetted Ullage Vent & Leak Leak Volume Portion Portion Product Vapor Detector Detector Tank Change of Tank of Tank Lines Lines Present? Results No. (gph) Pass/fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Yes/no Pass/Fail 550 W/O 0.002 PAS8 PASS N/A PASS NO N/A NDE appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call any time, day or night, when you need us. NDE Customer Service Representative Testing conducted by F. MILLER M. LEVESQUE TESTING SUMMARY WORK ORDER #: 960431 SALES REPRESENTATIVE: F. MILLER TEST DATE: 19 Sep 1992 TEST START TIME: 0S:00 TECH(S): M. LEVESQUE VAN NUMBER: 17 SITE NAME: UNOCAL #1367 VAN MILEAGE: SITE ADDRESS: 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE OIL CHECK: OK BAKERSFIELD CA 93304 TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE: SITE PHONE: (805)325-4141 OTHER NDE PERSONNEL: SITE ID #: TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION NUMBER: 92-1405 page 1 II Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Product: W/OIL True Capacity: 550 Manifolded tanks: NO Siphoned tanks: NO Manifolded Vents: NO Tank Bottom to top of fill: 78 Fill pipe length: 33 Tank diameter: 45 Tank Bottom to top of grade: 74 Fill pipe diameter: 4 Fluid Level: 29.00 Fluid Volume: 3?5 Water in tank: 0 Specific Gravity: 0.855 Tank Construction: STEEL OFT/UFT: UFT No. thermistor: 5 Ground Water level: 0 How determined: NO/W Te~t start time: 09:58 : : : : : Test finish time: 11:$9 : : : : : Total temperature change (degrees F): 0.198 , Total fluid level change (inches): 0.001 Leak Rate (GPH): 0.002 Pass/Fail: II PASS page 2 ULLAGE TESTING DATA II Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Product: W/OIL True Capacity: $$0 Ullage volume: 175 Fluid pressure on tank bottom(PSI): 0.90 Test Ullage pressure (PSI): 3.1 Stabilization time (minutes): Fill start time: 12:10 Time to 1 PSI: 1 Time to test pressure: Start time - test 1 12:25 : : : : : Nitrogen flow (cubic feet per hour/CFH): Ullage temperature: ?9.8 finish time - test 1: 12:35 Nitrogen flow (CFH): Start time - test 2: 1Z:35 Nitrogen flow (CFH): 0.20 Ullage temperature: 80.1 Finish time - test 2: 12:45 : Nitrogen flow (CFH): 0.20 Start time - test 3: : : : ~ : : Finish time - test 3: : : : : : : Nitrogen Flow (CFH): Pass/Fail: [[ PASS page 3 LINE TEST DATA II Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Product: W/OIL Pump type: Isolator: Test pressure: Test start time: Starting pressure: Total test time: Finish pressure: Volume loss: GPH loss: Pass/Fail: page 4 LEAK DETECTOR DATA II Tank 1 Tank 2 Tank 3 Tank 4 Tank 5 Tank 6 Serial number: 550 W/O Product: W/OIL Leak Detector manufacturer: Leak detector model: Leak detector serial number: Resiliency: Leak calibration: Open time: Element holding: Metering PSI: Confirm sensing of calibrate leak after keying nozzle: Does leak detector reset from GPH orifice?: Is seal/pressure relief tight (PLD only)?: page 5 IMPACT VALVE REPORT ~Please enter yes or no to the following: Dispencer Lever Correct Base Seals Number Product Functioning Height Anchored Internally page 6 COMMENTS NO MONITOR WELL ON SITE. REMOTE FILL WAS CAPPED. page 7 I-- I DEALER ROeEI H. LEE & ASSOCI ES, INC. ARC~HIT~=CTURE I=I.ANNINI3 ENQINI=E;RINQ 11~7 NORTH MoDOWELL BOULEVARD · PETALUMA, CALII=ORNIA B4EE~I-1489 ['?O'TJ 7B~-IEBC} I=~X [707) 7B~,BBOEI Bi:IIAN I=, ZITA JOHN W. ~iI=ORQl= H. MIU.~ Nolan W. Berst Nolan's Union Service 1501 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, CA 93304 Dear .Nolan W. Berst: Attached is the new HMMP for your facility.. This new HMMP is intended to replace any previous HMMP currently on file at your facility. Your signature is required on all pages tagged with flags. After signing all the copies presented to you by your UNOCAL Representative, the copy designated as "Dealer" is to be placed in the office at your facility and kept-up-to-date. All remaining copies are to be returned to Robert H. Lee in the attached, self-addressed, stamped envelope. Upon receipt of these . signed HMMPs, RHL will distribute them to the appropriate governing agencies and UNOCAL departments.~ Be aware that RHL has made a commitment on behalf of UNOCAL to submit a signed completed HMMP to the local administering agency within 30 days. Please, sign the Acknowledgement of Receipt at the bottom of this page and return it to your area manager. Sincerely, n Environmental Manager Ehclosures cc: Rick Sick, UNOCAL File A~~.EM~NT OF RECEIPT OI::F:ICI;B: LARKBRUR, CA BACRAMBNTO, CA BELLEVUE, WA I:'HOENIX, AZ · :. '~'~,- Bakersfield Fire Dep~ HazardoUs Materinl~ Division 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, CA. 93301 HAZARDOUS'MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN INSTRUCTION,S: To avoicl further QCtJOn, return this form witt"lJn 30 C~cIys of receipt. 2. TYPE/PRiNT ANSWERS IN ENGLISH. Answer the queslions Delow for the Dusiness as a whole. 4. Be Dr,er and concise cs possible. SECTION 1' BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION DATA MAILING ADDRESS: ~0[ ~UN~~ ~~ DUN &BRADSTREETNUMBER' ~--~++-?~+~ SIC CODE' PRIMARY ACTIVITY' AUTOH~~ ~~N~ ~ ~YC · MAILING ADDRESS: I~ ~U~ ~. SECTION 2: EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: CONTACT TITLE BUS, PHONE 24 HR. PHONE ~. No~,~,~ W. ~:t:R~-T ~ go~-37--5-~.14. J ~5-'~71-1c~14-- 2. ~OM~ I-Iazardou~ 5[aterial$ D~v~sion HAZ;~OUS MATERIALS MANAGE~!T PLAN SECTION 3: TRAINING: NUMBE~ OF EMPLOYESS: ~ MAT.ERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS ON FILE: y BRIEF SUMMARY OF TRAINING PROGRAM: SECTION 4: EXEMPTION REQUEST: I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT MY BUSINESS iS EXEMPT FROM THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 6.95 OF THE "CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE" FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: WE DO NOT HANDLE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. WE DO HANDLE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, BUT THE QUANTITIES AT NO TIMEEXCEED THE MINIMUM REPORTING QUANTITIES. OTHER (SPECIFY REASON] SECTION 5,: CERTIFICATIOH: I, ~C)L_,Z~.I ~q'. ']~_-3~.~"T' CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFOR- MATION IS ACCURATE. IUNDERSTAND THAT THIS INFORMATION WILL BE USED TO FULFILL MY FIRM'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE "CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE" ON HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (DIV. 20 CHAPTER 6.95 SEC. 25500 ET AL.) AND THAT INACCURATE INFORMATION CONSTITUTES PEI~JURY. s'J"c~TURE TITLE DATE Bakersfield Fire DepL Hazardous ~aterials Divisio HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN SECTION 6: NOTIFICATION AND EVACUATION PROCEDURES: A, AGENCY NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: i ~, EMPLOYEE NOTIFICATION AND EVACUATION: C. PUBLIC EVACUATION: ~-"~___ ut',JO~.,~,,~_.-, l,.'lo~ t-T'o~t~G, 'F'L-,~,~ ) F',"~----. ~ , D. EMERGENCY MEDICAL PLAN: ~,,~__--~----- u N eC_..,~,.u.-. PI oN ~T'C~I ~ "PL-,~ ,~ ~,~G~.. ~ - Hazardous .Nfa,.erials Division HAZ~DOUS MATERIALS MANAGEI~NT PLAN SECTION 7: MITIGATION, pREVENTION AND ABATEMENT PLAN: A R~LEA~E PREVENTiON'STEPS: RELEASE CONTAINMENT AND/OR MINIMIZATION: ,.,."' CLEAN-UP PROCEDURES: SECTION 8: UTILITY SHUT-OFFS (LOCATION OF SHUT-OFFS AT YOUR FACILITY)' NATURAL GAS/PROPANE: OF ELECTRICAL: IN ~F__ t~-,c:~::~M A-T' IOC~'T'+'! ~ ~ 5VC,. 1~." WATER: IN ~ID ~.I, OA. uF-,, SPECIAL' LOCK BOX: YES~ IF YES, LOCATION: SECTION 9: PRIVATE FIRE PROTECTION/WATER AVAILABILITY: A. PRIVATE FIRE P~OTEC:TION' B, WATER AVAILABILITY (FIRE MYD~ANT): 1 CITY of BAKERSFIELD Farm and Agriculture [] Standard Business...~-IAZARDOUS HATERTALS INVENTORY NON--TRADE SECRETS Page _]]... ~II . ZiP: ~g~SP~._ff~ CITY. ZIP:. ~AAE~2FI~/~ ~_ ~_~, ! 2 ] 4 5 6 ~ 8 9 10 II 12 13 lrans [yqe ,ax Average Xflnual Heasure I ys ~ont ~ont Coot Us ' Location?ace ~v~y llamas or ~ixture/Coe;onents Code. ~oae Am: AeC EsL UntLs on ILo ~ype tress leer Co~eStorea in facility . See lnstru::~ans Physical 'and Uealth Hazard C.A.S. Number ~~/~ Component II Hame I C.A.S. Humber (Check all that apply) ' , .. ~U~ ~e ilazard ~ Reackivi~ ~ Delayed ~ Sudden Release ~ Immediate Component 12 Name I C.A.S. Number ~ Health o~Pressure HealLh Componen~ 13 Name I C.A.S; Number Ph~)ical god ~ealth UHaFd C.A.S. Number ~~/~ Component II Name I C.A.S. Number ICheck mmt that app)yl ~ ~Fire Hazard n Reactivity ~ Delayed ~ Sudden Release ~ l,~i~ Co,ponenL U ,a,e ,C.A.S. Number HeR/Lb of Pressure Component 13 Name I C.A.S. Humber PhySical Ind Health Ua~ard C.A.S. Humber Component II Name & C.A.S. Number ICheck ali that Component 12 'Name I C.A.S. 'Number ~FireHazard ~Reactivity ~0elayed ~ Sudden Release U Immediate HeR I:h of Pressure Health ~ ComponenL 13 Hame & C.A.S. Number Physical end Uealth UaTard C.A.S. Humber ~T~- [~ -~ Component II Name I C.A.S. Hu~ber ~- ICheck ell that app/Yl ~~~~ ~1~ __ Component 12 Hame I C.A,S. Humber ~1 ~Fire Hazard ~ Reactivity ~Delayed ~ Sudden Release ~ Immediate HeR/th ok Pressure Health Component 13 Hame I C.A,S. Humber EMERGENCY CONTACTS fflR~~ W.~~ TI " fl2Ri~e TITle :erti~i~m[ioq .(Repd ~pd.~fgr~ after comp~f(]9.,~l sections) cer%Hy under ~enmlt[ ~))m) [n~t 1 nlv~pe[sonmj)~.eXmmlnqQtqo)m )amtmtm[.vit~the InlormaL)on ~u~aiLtpd in this Ind all . t'ta:hed dqcvaent), mnQ IBm[ cased on.my inquiry Or.those InOlylOUllS responsible )or obtaining the information. I believe that the ;'~F~~O[ o~netlop~ratot u~ o~tlo~e~~hotizeo tept~sen~tike CITY of BAKERSFIELD Farm andAgticulture 0 Standard Business j~HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY ? · NON--TRADE SECRETS ~USINESS NAME: OWNER NAME: NAME OF Tills FACILIIY: LOCATION; ADDRESS: STANDARD IND. CLASS CODE~' CJ1Y. ZIP: CIIY. ZIP:" DUN AND BRADSTREEI NUMBER .... ~ ....................... PIIOUE #: ' PtIONE #: - - - . REFER TO'--[NSTRUCTIONS-I:~R--PROPER CODES - - ~. ~ frans !XRo ~ax Average Annual Measure I ys ~ont ~ont . ~ont' Us . tocatjon.¥he[e. Code cboe AmC Ami Est Units on ILe ~ype ~ress lamp ColeStored !n.~aC!ll? ........ See [nstruc~ms ........ Physical ~d ~ealth Nmrd C.A.S. Hu~ber JO~-~[-[ Component II XaBe I.C.A.S. Number ICheck al/ that ap~ly) ' ~l-~~ / ~ea/[h of Pressure HealLh ComponenL 13 Name i C.A,S. Number '"~ I~ I~°l l?~ I ~mP' ,l~ I ~s leg I / I ~'l~"l,.~o~e~"~y ~~o~~ Fir~ Hazard 0 Reactivity ~Oelayed 0 Sudden Release 0 Immediate Coeponent 12 Hame I C.A.S. Humber , Health of Pressure Health ........ Component 13 Name I C.A.S. Number IJ.,Jl Il Iltll __ PhySical And ~ealth pmrd C.A.S. Number Component II Name i C.A.S. Nmer (Check all that apply} Component 12 Name I C.A.S. Humber ~ Fire Hazard ~ Reactivity ~ Oelayed ~ Sudden Release ~ leeediate Health of Pressure Health .............. ~ Component 13 Name I C.A.S. Number PhYsical ifld Health UHlrd C,A,S, Humber Component II Hame I C.A.S. Humber (Check all that app/H Component 12 Hame I C.A.S. Number ~ FireH4zard ~ ReacHvity ~ Belayed ~ Sudden Release ~ lamed[aLe Health of Pressure Health Component I~ Name I C.X.S. Number EMERGENCY CONTACTS ~1 ~2 R~e ' TI[]~ 2~~-- Nike .... HUe !certHy uneer pen4lt~ o/u~ [n~t lnavepeTsoflH~.examlnqgtqotm lamillar, vit~the tnlorm4klon ~u~miLt~d in this lndall. at'~ached.dgcveent~, ami &~t Based on_my Inquiry 9[those InDiviDuals responsible ~r obLalflin9 the lnlormaclofl, I believe :hat the · suom~Lteo Ifl/oralLIo~ Is &rue~ Iccurl~e~ lng coAp/eEa. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROIJND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY~SITE MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT S CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED SITE ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE i. FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS - (MUST BE COMPLETED) NEAREST CROJ~S STREET PARCEL ii (OPTiONAl) ADDRESS / r-und, (je Ches r', e . BOX [~;~DIVlDUAL J~ PARTNERSHIP J---J LOCAl.AGENCY ~ COUNTY-AGENCY J---J STATE.AGENCY ~ FEDERAL.AGENCY TO iNDICATE [~] CORPORATION DISTRICTS TYPE OF BUSINESS ~--"~J I GAS STAT'ONj----J 3 FARM J---'JJ'~'J 2 DISTR,SUTOR4 PROCESSOR J'-'-J 5 OTHER Ij'--'jORRESERVATIONTRuSTV' IF INDIAN I' OF 3KS AT SITE IE' P' A'LANDS C~I.~ q(~l'20~'7'~'"a~-O~5""LD''(°Pti°nal)' EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY) · Optional DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) pHONE iii WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME[LAST, FIRST) PHONE l WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: N.AME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE I WITH AREA CODE II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~/ bo~[ Io indicate J~] INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL-AGENCY J'-'-J STATE-AGENCY P.O. ~x ~- ~o.PO.,.o. ~.ART.£.~.. ~ ~ou~.,GENC¥ ~ ~EDE~.AGENC¥ STATical-IZIP CODE ¢Z~83 IPHONE # WITH AREA CODE C'TYNAM I'I 12, O'q Ots) III. TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ?,0, I~o~ ~ISB-- I m-co,PO.,~o. =,ART.E.s.I, = coup.AGENcy r~ CITY J STATE J ZiP CODE ~ , J PHONE J WITH AREA CODE I¥. BOARD OF EC~UALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 739-2582 if ques[ions arise. TY(TK) HQJ~-J- I I I ,I V. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADD RESS Legal nolificalio~ and billing will be senl iD ihe l~nk owner unless box I Dr II is checke& J CHECK ONE BOX INDICATING WHICH ASOVE ADDRESS SHOULD BE USED FOR LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS AND BILLING: ,.[~ II.~J. III. J--~J THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT J ~PL~CAN1'S N~EO & SIGN~U RE) J DATE MONTH,'CAY/YEAR LO~'J~GENCY USE ONLY '.~ OOLJN ~TY it OURISDICTION # FACILITY it THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY AT LEAST (11 OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY. FORM A (9-9O) F~Om3A,~2 STATE OF CAIJF'ORNIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION . FORM B COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK; SYSTEM, MARK ONLY [] I NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT C~'5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE~ ONE ITEM [] 2 INmRIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] S TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [] 8 TANK REMOVED ,'OBAOR FACILITYNAMEWHERETANKISINSTALLED= ~.Nf)C/~L.- 3S I. TANK D ESCRIPTION cOMPtETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN o. ,NSTALLEO ,M AY. EAR, Iq(~7 II. TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED. COMPt. ETE ITEM C. ' A. I MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OIL 8. ~ C. UNLEADED [] 2 P~FROLEUbl [] 80 EMPTY PRODUCT [] ,bPREM,UM [] 7 METHANOL UNLEAOED ~ $ JET FUEL [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 3 WASTE [] 2 LEADED[] ag OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM O. I~ELOW O. IF (A. 11 IS NOT MARKED. ENTER NAME DF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #: IlL TANK CONSTRUCTION ~ MAR~ ONE ITeM ONLY ~N EOXES ~, a. AND C, ANDALLTHATAPPLIES IN I~OX D A. TYPE OF [] ~ DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER a. TA~K [] ~ sAR~ STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] ~ ~aERGL~SS [] · STEEL CL~D W/P~BERGL~SS REINPORCEDPL~S~C MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATII~LEW/FRP (~.i=..~:r~.~) [] g .RONZ~ [] ,0 GALVAN,ZEO s~a. [] ~s UN.OW. [] ~g oTHER [] , RU.BER UNED [] ~ AL~o L.,.G [] = EPOX~ U.,.~ [] ~ ..ENOL= UNI.G C. INTERIOR r-'i,, $ GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] SS OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATISLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES ~ NO~ D. CORROSION [] ~ POLYETHYLENE WRA, [] ~ COA~NG [] S VI~L WRA; [] ~ maERGL~SS RE~.FORCED P~ST~C PROTECTION . [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECT!ON [] 9~ NONE ~9S UNKNOWN [] ~g OTHER I~J. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A ~FASOVEGROU~DOR U ~UNDERGROUNO. SOTHI~APPUCABLE · A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A ~2 PRESSURE . A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER 8. CONSTRUCTION A(~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL .~ U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U ~ EARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC}A~' 4 FISERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL~NICOATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U ~0 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATICLINELEAKDETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION / I , v,suAL CHEC~ [] ~ ,NVENTOR¥ RECONC,L,AT~N []= ~'~OR ~DN,TOR,N~ []. AUTOMAT,C TAN~ GA~IN~ [] .' GROUND WATER MON,TORING ~--]s TAN, TESTING [] ? INTERSTmALMONITORING [] ,, NONE [] SS UN~OWN [] ~J, OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED U,~ER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT ~ ~a(PPLICAN¥S NAME ~ ~ / / NTEO & SIGNATURE) ~ , ,~,' LOCAL AG ENCY USE ONLY(/' THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW COUNTY # JURISDICTION # ' FACILITY # TANK # ~EnMi~ NUM~En I PERMIT APPROVED BWOATE I PEn~n EXPIP~TION DATE FORM B (~-a3 THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPUCAT]ON - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. STATE WA~ ~ESOUR~S CO~ROL 80~D UNDErGrOUND STO AGE TANK PE MIT APPLICATION - FOSM B COMPLAN A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYS~ MAR~ ONLY ~ ~ N~ PERMIT ~ 3 REN~ PERMIT ~ 5 CHANGE OF ~ORMATION ~ 7 PERM~ENTLY CLOSED ON ONE ITEM ~ 2 ~N~RIM PERMIT ~ 4 ~ENOEO PERMIT ~ 6 ~MPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~ 8 TANK REMOVED OBAOR FACIL~NAMEWHERETANK1SINSTALLEO: ~~ ~ ~ I. TANK DESCRIPTION cou~m ALL ITEMS - SPECIm IF UNKNOm II. TANK CONTE~S ~A-~ ISMARKEO, COaPL~IT~C. ~ 2 P~T~OLEUM ~ 80 EMP~ PROO~T ~ ~bPRSMIUM 4 ~S~OL UNLADED ~ 5 J~EL ~ 7 M~OL ~ 3 CHEM]CAL PROOUCT ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ 2 WAS~ ~ 2 L~DED~ ag O~ER (OESCRlaE IN I~M O. BELOW Ill TANK CONSTRUCTION A, ~PE OF ~ ~ DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WA~ WI~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN SYSTE~ ~ ~ S~,~L~ WALL ~ ~ S~CO,OARY CO,TA~N~ENT (wUL~o~AN~ ~ ~g 8. T~ ~ I BARE STEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 ~IaERG~SS ~ 4 STEEL C~D W/FIBERGLASS REIN~RCEDP~TiC MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLWlNYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ~U~INUM ~ 8 1~0 ME~ANOL COMPATIBLEW~RP (Prim,ryTank) ~ 9 BRON~ ~ 10 ~LVANIZEO S~ ~ 95 UN~0WN ~ ga C. INTERIOR ~ 5 G~SS L~NtNG ~ S UNLINED ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ ~ LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 1~/. ME~ANOL ? YES ~ D. CORROSION ~ 1 ~L~%ENE WRAP ~ 2 ~ATING ~ 3 VI~L WR~ ~ 4 FIaERG~S REINFORCED P~STIC PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION ~ gl NONE ~g5 UN~OWN ~ ~ Q~ER IV, PIPING INFORMATION cmc~ A ~FAaOVEGROUNOOR U A. SYSTEM TYPE A u 1 SUCTION A ~2 PRESSURE A U 3 G~VIW A U 99 Q~ER B. CONSTRUCTION ' A~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN ~ U g9 C. MATER[AL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 ~LWlNYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A~ 4 FIBERG~S PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ~UMINUM A U 6 CONCRE~ A U 7 $TEELWlCOATING A ~ 8 1~. ME~ANOL COMPATIBLEWIFRP PROTECTION A U g ~LVANIZED STE~ A ~ 10 CA~OOICPROTECTION A U 95 UN~OWN A ~ gg O~ER D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATtCLINELEAKOETECTOR ~ 2 LtNET~H~ESS TESTING ~ 3 aTERS~L V, T~K LEAK D~ECTION VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMA~ON L ESTIMATED OAT~ LASY USeD (MO/OAY~R, I ~ ESTIMATED QUANT'~ OF I3' WAs TANK FI~D WI~ YES ~ NO~ SUBSYANC~ R~DAININ~ ~LLONS ~NERT ~ATERIAL 7 THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLIED UN~R PENAL~ OF PERJURY. AND. TO ~E 8EST OF MY K~OW~DGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT COU~ ~ JURISDiCTiON · FAClL~ ~ TANK ~ FORa ~ (~ THIS FO~M ~UST aE AC~ED aY A PER~ ~PUCADON - FOR~ ~ UNLESS A CURRE~ FORa A HAS SEEN STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 80ARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PEFtM[T APPLICATION . FORM B COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 mENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARy TANK CLOSURE [] 8 TANK REMOVED . o,A oR FAC U NAME WHERE TANK,S ,NS AU. EO: /5 G I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMP~E~ALLrrEMS- SPECIal, UNKNOWN C. OAT/ INSTALLED (MO/OAY/YEAR) ~) O. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONSi II. TANK CONTENTS ~A.~ ~S MARKEO. COMPLET~ITEM C. A. [] ~ MOTOR ~,ICLE ~UEL [] , O'LB. C. [] ~.REGU~RuNL~OED ' ~ , ~ ~S~OLD'ESE~ [] ~ AV~,~ONGAS ' UNL~OEO ~ 3 CHEMICAL PROOUCT ~ g5 U~NOWN WAS~ ~ 2 L~OED ~ g90~ER (OESCR~aE IN I~M O. BELOW ill. TANK CONSTRUCTION 'UA,KONSITEUONLY~NnOXSS~a.~OC.~OA~L~ATAPPU~StNnOXO SYSTEM~2 SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAUL~DTAN~ ~ 99 O~ER C. INTERIOR ~ S a~sS LINING ~ UNLIN~O ~ ,S UN,OWN UNING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 1~. ME~ANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION ~ ~ ~LY~YLENE WRAP ~ '2 COA~NG ~ 3 VI~L WRY' ~ 4 FIBERG~S REINFORCED P~STIC PROTECTION ~ 5 CA~OOIC PROTECTION ~ 91 NONE ~ UN~OWN ~ ~90~ER IV. PiPiNG INFORMATION c~.cm A IFABOVEGRQUNDOR U IFUNOERGRCUNO, BO~ IF APPLICABLE ' A. SYSTEM TYPE A u 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE . ~ G~VIW A U 99 O~ER B. CONSTRUCTION A ~ 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE .WALL A ~ 3 LINED TRENCH A U g5 UNKNOWN A ~ ~ O~ER C. MATERIAL AND A U ~ 8ARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS S~EL A U 3 ~L~INYL CHLORIOE (PVC)A ~ FlaERG~S PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ~UMINUM A U 6 CONCR~ A U 7 STEEL WI COATING A U 8 l~e M~OL ~MPA~BLEW~RP PROTE~[ON A U .9 ~LVANIZEO S~ A U 10 CATHOO~PROTECTION A U 95 UN~OWN A U 99 O~ER O. LEAK ~ETECTION ~ AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~2 LINE T~H~ESS TESTING~ 3 ~T~S~T~L~NffORiNG ~ 99 O~ER V. TAN~ LEAK D~ECTION/ - ' VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION ~IS ~ORM HAS BEEN COMPL~ED~NDER PENAL ~ OF ~ERJUR~ AND TO ~E BEST OF ~ KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT COU~ ~ JURISDICTION · FACIL~ e TANK ~0~ a (~ THIS FORM MUST BE ACne,lED BY A PERMff ~PUCATION - FORM ~ UNLESS A CURRE~ FORM A HAS BEEN R~D. COMMERCIAL ....... BRUNDAGE LANE HYD ! I [i~i-i I ! I ~l',,;x lOM I I ~ I ~CMU WALL l OM RU i '~ ~ O o< ~ ~ I SOLVENT ~) I IrT 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE I~~ I VACANT EMERGENCY PUMP · MONiTORiNG WELLS S~UT-O~ S~TE ELECTRICAL PANEL ~ GREASE (BARREL) NATURAL OAS ~ U.O. WASTE OIL TANK 1501 BRUNDAGE LANE SHUT-OFF WATER SHUT-OFF ~ U.G. PRODUCT TANK BAKERSFIELD, CALiFORNiA .... 1 567 ~ SOLVENT SINK FIRE EXTINGUISHER ~ BATTERY STORAGE AREA STORM DRAIN ~ MOTOR/TRANSMISSION OIL ,0, ST (S~RV,C~ ~A*) ~ T~L~P~O.~ .o.~= ~. ~ ~*~,*=~. ,~=.i ARCHI~CIURE ENGINEERING HYDRANT ~ EMERGENCY MEETING ,~ ~. ~.~ o.~ .==. ~... ~ ...~. (.,~) .~,-~ PLACE UNOCAL SERVICE STAIN MONITORING PLAN-.---' ..... DEALER: Nolan W. Berst UNOCAL SERVICE STATION: 1367 ADDRESS: 1501 Brundage Lane CITY: Bakersfield PHONE: 805-325-4141 24-HR. STATION NUMBER 805-325-4141 UNOCAL REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Foster PHONE: (209)237-5141 UNOCAL EMERGENCY PHONE: (415)867-0760 (24 HOURS) LOCAL AGENCY:Bakersfield Fire Department ADDRESS: 2130 "G" Street PHONE: 805-326-3979 CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES PHONE: (800)852-7550 (24 HOURS) ~ UNDERGROUND TANKS 87 OCTANE: 10,000 Single Wall· 89 OCTANE: BLENDING VALVE 92 OCTANE: 10,000 Single Wall DIESEL: WASTE OIL: 550 Single Wall PIPING CONTAINMENT:Single Wall ~ MONITORING METHODS:Inventory Reconciliation (Rev. 11-90) 'Prepared by Robert H. Lee and Associates THBLE OF CONTENTS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE ...................................... Page 3 A copy of this page must be filled out and posted conspicuously on site. HOW TO USE THIS BOOKLET ................................ , .......... Page 4 'DHILY VISUHL MONITORING... ........................................ Page 4 MONITORING FOR BINGLE WALL TANKS .................................. Page 5 Inspections To Be Conducted By Dealer Product Tank Gauging Procedures Record Keeping For Fuel Tanks Waste Oil Tank Gauging Procedure What To Do If You Exceed The Allowable Variation MONITORING DOUBLE WALL TANKS ......................... ............. Page 6 Inspections To Be Conducted By Dealer Secondary Containment Monitoring Procedure Record Keeping For Secondary Containment Electronic Monitoring Systems OVER~ILL/BPILL PROTECTION AND CLEAN-UP ............................ Page 7' Deliveries/Gauging Ball Vent Line Float System Waste'Oil Tank Clean-up/Records INSPECTIONS TO BE COORDINHTED BY UNOCAL ........................... Page 8 Yearly Inspections and Testing Vadose/Groundwater Monitoring Wells EMPLOYEE TRAINING PLAN ......................................... Pages 9-10 Outline for Mandatory Safety Training for Ail Employees FORMS TO BE COMPLETED(Copy these'forms for your own use) Quarterly Report ................................................ Form A Daily Visual Monitoring Log ...................................... Form B Inventory Reconciliation Sheet .................................. Form C Waste Oil Tank Gauging Sheet .................................... Form D Release Evaluation Checklist .................................... Form E Unauthorized Release Report ..................................... Form F Equipment Test Log .............................................. Form G Safety Training Log ............................................. Form H NOT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS BOOKLET WILL BE APPLICABLE. REFER TO THE COVER SHEET TO CONFIRM WHAT EQUIPMENT IS ON SITE. Page 2 of 10 EMERGENCY RESPONSE OOCEDURE In the event of a fire, spill, or a leak or suspected leak in the tanks and/or piping, the following steps are to be taken as appliCable: 1..TURN OFF PUMPS using the Emergency Pump Shut-Off Switch. 2. If there is any immediate danger, ANNOUNCE to all persons on the site: "There is an emergency. Please turn off ~your engines and'leave the station on foot immediately." 3. CALL FOR HELP in case of an emergency by dialing 9-1-1 and giving the following information: "THERE IS A FIRE / DANGEROUS GASOLINE SPILL at the UNOCAL Station at (give address)." If anyone is trapped or needs medical attention, tell the answering dispatcher. Stay on the phone and be prepared to answer any questions concerning the situation. 5. ATTEMPT TO EXTINGUISH any fire if you can do so safely. Have the fire extinguisher ready to use in the event of any dangerous spill. Try to contain any large spill, or use absorbent on smaller spills. 6. REPORT to arriving~emergency response personnel to provide them with any information or assistance they might need. 7. CONTACT the station dealer is s/he is not already at the station. Use the list below for emergency contacts: 1. Name/Bus./Home: Nolan W. Berst 805-325-4141 / 805-871-1814 2. Name/Bus./Home: None 8. NOTIFY your UNOCAL Retail Representative by phone WITHIN 24 HOURS (also use the UNOCAL Emergency Phone, after hours): 1. UNOCAL REPRESENTATIVE/PHONE NUMBER: Jim'Foster/(209)237-5141 2. UNOCAL EMERGENCY PHONE: (415) 867-0760 (24 HOURS) You must mail a completed Unauthorized Release Report to the Rep within 24 hours. UNOCAL will notify the appropriate State and Local agencies unless the situation requires urgent immediate response by the agencies, in which case the DEALER should notify these agencies: 1. LOCAL AGENCY: Bakersfield Fire Department PHONE NUMBER: 805-326-3979 2. CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES: (800)852-7550 (24 HOURS) 9. Dealer should attempt to isolate leak location by inspection, 10. UNOCAL Retail Representative will coordinate with UNOCAL Maintenance and Construction whatever corrective actions need to be taken beyond the Dealer'capabilities. UNOCAL Maintenance and Construction will file whatever reports need to be filed with local and sta~e agencies, and send a copy to the station for the Dealer's file. '~ A COPY OFfStAGE MUST BE FILLED OUT AND POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY ON SITE. Page 3 of 10 The cover sheet of_this booklet contains'useful information about the underground facili~ at your station. Dep~iing on the information given, you must use ~ifferent forms in this boo]~let: 1. If your station has any single wall product tanks, use Form C. 2. If your station has any double wall product tanks, use Form B. 3. If your station has a single wall waste oil tank, use-Form D. 4. If your station has a double wall waste oil tank, use Form B. 5. If your station has any double wall piping, use Form B. 6. If your station has a piping trench liner, use Form B. 7. If your station has an electronic monitoring system for any double wall piping or trench liner, you need not use Form. B for any double Wall tanks or piping. 8. If your.station has vadose or groundwater monitoring wells, you still need to use Forms C and/or D as applicable. 9~. If your station has other hazardous materials (see Daily Visual Monitoring, below), you are responsible also for that portion of Form B. Also, all stations must comDlete Form A and send it in every 3 months to the local aqency shown on the cover sheet. In case of a leak or spill, you must complete Form E to attach to Form A, and you must send a copy of Form F to your UNOCAL Representative within 24 hours. You must also notify your representative by phone (and/or call the UNOCAL Emergency Phone after hours). Your must post a copy of Page 3 at a conspicuous location in your cashiers area. Your must keep a copy of Form H to document the training received by your employees. KEEP COPIES OF ALL FORMS YOU MAIL OUT! DAILY VISUAL MONITORING Hazardous Materials stored underground include: Gasoline Diesel Fuel Waste Oil These products are monitored for leaks in the underground tanks and piping. Hazardous Materials stored aboveground include: Propane Waste Oil °(prior to dumping in underground tanks) Motor Oil Transmission Oil Gear Lubricant (80W/90) Grease Solvent (inCluding parts cleaners) Battery Acid Antifreeze If your station stores any of these materials, the storage areas must be visually inspected every day for signs of leakage. ~' If there is a leak or spill of any of the hazardous materials, whether stored above or underground, you must follow the Emergency. Response Procedures outlined on Page 3, as applicable. Page 4 of 10 MONITORING FOR SINGLE-WALL TANKS INSPECTIONS TO BE ~.UCTED BY DEALER ~ 1. Daily reconcill~lon shall be made of the~.e~tory control records.. 2.Daily visual inspection for leaks shal~-be made in the areas of: -Submerged pump - Tank fill (also inspected after each delivery) 3. Dealer MUST be aware that a reduction in product flow to 3 gallons per minute (gpm) indicates a potential piping leak. PRODUCT TANK GAUGING PROCEDURE 1. Use a gauge stick (diPstick) to measure the level of gasoline in each tank. Lower the stick slowly until it hits the bottom of the tank. The use of fuel-finding paste is recommended. 2. Slowly pull the stick back out, and observe the point where the stick begins to be discolored by the liquid. 3. 'Write this nUmber down, and repeat the same procedure. If the two number are not close, repeat the procedure until the numbers agree. 4. Enter the final number in your dealer books. If it is raining, water'can spoil the readings, and should not be allowed to enter the tank. If it does not stop raining, care must be taken to ensure the stick readings are accurate. RECORD KEEPING FOR SINGLE-WALL TANKS 1. Use your dealer books to keep track of your daily dipstick reading. 2. Record daily all dispenser meter readings in your dealer books. 3. Record all deliveries in your dealer books. 4. The dipstick, dispenser meter, and delivery recordings are to be used daily in filling out the "Inventory Reconciliation Sheet" (attached). WASTE OIL TANK GAUGING PROCEDURE 1. To monitor the inventory level in the waste oil tank, be prepared to have %he tank locked for at least 12 hours or longer if required.by your local agency. This shall be done weekly. NO INPUTS OR WITHDRAWALS SHALL OCCUR DURING THESE PERIODS. 2. Stick gauge the tank immediately before closing access to the waste oil tank, and immediately after reopening the tank, and enter those numbers in columns C and D of the "Waste Oil Tank Gauging Sheet" (attached) in both inches and. gallo~s. 3. The difference between those two columns is the actual variation (column E). 4. For allowable variation (column F), use 2.8 gallons if you have a 280 gallon capacity, or 5.0 gallons if you have a 520 or 550 gallon tank. WHAT TO DO IF YOU EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE VARIATION If you EVER exceed the allowable variation (Inventory Reconciliation Sheet, column 13, or Waste Oil Tank Gauging Sheet, column G), follow the RESPONSE PROCEDURE shown on Page 3. Notify your UNOCAL representative within 24 hours of discovery of a suspected leak. UNOCAL will be responsible for coordinating one or more of the following: - Performing a metered vs. measured inventory reconciliation. - Contacting the appropriate State and Local agencies. - Visually inspecting for leaks. - Calibrating the dispenser meters. ~. - Hiring a tank tester to determine if there is a leak. - Having the tank(s) and/or piping repaired or replaced if necessary, The "Unauthorized Release Report" must be sent.to UNOCAL within 24 hours. The "Release Evaluation Checklist" must be attached to the ,'Inventory- Reconciliation Sheet", or the "Waste Oil Tank Gauging Sheet" where the allowable variation was exceeded. Page 5 of 10 INSPECTIONS TO BE C~UCTED BY DEALER ~ 1. Daily reconcili~on shall be made of theW~ent°ry Control Records. 2. Daily visual'inspection-for leaks Shall be made in the areas of: - Submerged pump - Tank fill (also inspected after each delivery) 3. Dealer MUST be aware that a reduction in product flow to 3 gallons per · minute (gpm) indicates a potential leakl SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MONITORING PROCEDURE Tank or Piping Secondary Containment (annular space or Piping Trench Liner) shall be monitored Daily by the dealer, unless a less frequent period is allowed. This is done to determine if product is leaking from the primary container or if water is entering from an outside source. This procedure is not necessary if an electronic monitoring system is installed to monitor these items. Contact your UNOCAL representative for monitoring port locations. 1. Use a gauge stick (dipstick) to detect any liquid in the tank annular space, double wall piping monitoring ports, or piping trench liner monitoring wells. Lower the stick slowly until it hits the bottom of the tank annular space. 2. Slowly pull the stick back out and observe whether the stick has been disColored by liquid. If product and/or water is detected, immediately contact your representative. 3. Write this number down, and repeat the same procedure. If the two numbers are not close, repeat the procedure until the numbers agree. 4. Enter the final number in the "Secondary Containment Recording Sheet (attached). NOTE: Piping trench monitoring wells consist of slotted PVC pipe which allows liquid intrusion and a manhole for access. Wells are located at the lowest point of the fiberglass trench liner. RECORD KEEPING FOR DOUBLE-WALL TANKS & PIPING 1. Keep track daily of the liquid level on the "Secondary Containment Recording Sheet". 2. If ANY fuel and/or water is discovered in the trench liner,'call your representative IMMEDIATELY, and explain the situation. 3. If the representative has been notified, but after 8 hours it has not been possible to remove all the liquid from the secondary containment, dealer must contact the local agency shown on the cover sheet. ELECTRONIC MONITORING SYSTEMS If this station is equipped with an electronic .monitoring system for underground tanks and piping, in the event of a leak in the primary containment, product will be contained in the annular space. The sensors for the electronic monitoring system are located at the iow end of each tank, and at the low end of the piping where .the product will drain back into the tank. There may be sensors, at additional locations. Sensors will signal the presence of a leak. If a leak is discovered, the "Unauthorized Release Report" must be sent to UNOCAL within 24 hours. The "Release Evaluation Checklist". must be attached to the "Quarterly Report". ..~ Page 6 of 10 1. DELIVERIES/GAUGING Dealer is resp~ible to ensure that the d~very he or she requests is not in exces~wof the tank capacity, tak~ into consideration the amount Currently in tank. Driver is to gauge tank to assure capacity is available for the entire load and must remain in attendance during the entire delivery to monitor the operation. · 2. BALL VENT LINE FLOAT SYSTEM (Only for double-wall tanks installed after July 1986.) The ball float valve system installed with the tank substantially prevents the possibility of overfill occurring. If the tank is filled to the ball float level, the petroleum product delivery will be cut to 3 gallons per minute alerting the driver of a potential overfill condition. In the event that this occurs, the following actions will be'taken: 1. The delivery ·truck driver shall turn off the petroleum product supply at the truck, leaving the hose fully connected to the tank fill pipe line and the truck. 2. The small amount of petroleum product remaining in the hose shall be slowly drained into the tank. Since the ball float valve is 2 to 3 inches below the top of the tank, there remains a 100 + gallon capacity within the tank at the moment when the ball float closes off delivery. The bleed hole in the ball float valve allows the remaining petroleum product in the hose to completely drain through the fill pipe into the tank. 3. The hose shall be'disconnected from the fill pipe only when it has fully drained. In the event that spillage occurs upon hose disconnection, the remaining small amount of petroleum product will be properly contained. 3. WASTE OIL TANK 1. Station is equipped with waste oil buckets which hold a· maximum cap~city of 3 gallons (about 3 to 4 cars' worth of waste oil). 2. Prior to dumping any waste oil, dealer is to gauge the tank to assure that holding capacity is greater than that which will be put into the tank. 3. Waste oil is poured directly through fill/pump out pipe, using a funnel. Should any waste oil spill during this operation, it will be properly contained using absorbent material: Page 7 of 10 ~-~aii'~ills (less than 1 gallon and only requiring 15 minUtes to clean up) s~l be cleaned up using abs~ent materials. 2. Larger spil~occurring during product ~ivery shall'be reported to the terminal by the dealer and/or by delivery truck driver. The terminal superwisor will 'notify a local petroleum maintenance ~contractor who is equipped with a N.F.P.A. approved type hand pump, vacuum and transport container. Large spills not caused by delivery shall be reported .~mmediately to your rep. 3. Spills shall be cleaned up within 8 hours of detection, returned to local terminal and/or disposed of in a lawful manner. 4. Dealer shall record all spills whether or not it is due to delivery overfill or accidental spillage, which exceeds approximately one gallon, and action taken on the "Unauthorized Release Report" (attached), and send it to UNOCAL within 24 hours. 5. Large spills (more than 1 gallon) must be reported to the local agency indicated on the cover sheet within 24 hours. If the spill is large enough to pose a significant hazard, it must also be reported to the California Office of Emergency Services at 800-852- 7550. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL~9-1-1 INSPECTIONS TO BE COORDINATED BY UNOCAL YEARLY INSPECTIONS AND TESTING Yearly testing shall be made of the following: 1. Pressurized piping systems shall be monitored using in-line leak detectors. Leak detectors shall be tested annually for proper operation. Dealer MUST be aware that a reduction in product flow to 3 gallons per minute (gpm) indicates a potential piping leak. 2. Tanks and piping shall be tested annually for tightness, using a State-Certified test system. (For non-secondarily contained tanks and piping only.) 3. Electronic monitoring systems shall be tested annually for proper operation. (For secondarily contained tanks and piping only.) 4. Dispenser core holes, shear valves, and blending valves shall be annually inspected by UNOCAL for signs of leakage. 5. Dispenser meters (recording total sales in gallons) shall be calibrated once annually by UNOCAL. Any additional calibration wilI be the responsibility of the dealer. Use the "Dispenser Meter Calibration Form". YAD0SE/GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS This section is not applicable unless "Monitoring Methods" line on cover sheet shows "Vadose'Wells" or "Groundwater Wells".) The monitoring of vadose wells and groundwater monitoring%.wells is contracted out to Applied Geo Systems. Monitoring is performed monthly for vap6r analysis of the vadose wells and subjective analysis for traces of product in the groundwater monitoring wells. Monitoring is performed quarterly for laboratory analysis of groundwater samples. Monitoring records are maintained on-site in the dealer's office, and are available for inspection. Page $ of 10 EMPLOYEE TRAINING Employees must be given this training before starting work, and refresher courses must be provided annually. Records must be kept to show when each station employee has been given his/her safety training. Use the following outline: I. FIRST THINGS TO KNOW A. EMERGENCY PUMP SHUT-OFF: This turns off the turbine pumps that provide flow to the dispensers from the underground tanks. In case of a leak, shutting off the pumps will help to prevent spills. LOCATION: In storage room at north end of svc bay B. ELECTRICAL PANEL: The panel allows you to selectively cut off power to lights, signs, pumps, etc. The main switch kills all power · at the site. .LOCATION: In storage room at north end of svc bay C. WATER SHUT-OFF: The water shut-off may be necessary in some cases. LOCATION: ·In sidewalk on Chester Avenue D.FIRST AID KIT: LOCATION: In storage room E. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS: Use only on small fires that you can handle. Do not attempt to extinguish large fires on your own; call 9-1-1 for help. LOCATION: 3-in sales room F. ABSORBENT: In the form of crystals or cloth, absorbent can soak up small spills of gasoline, diesel fuel, or other petroleum products. Absorbent should be used rather than washing spills down a drain. o In case of ·large spills merely try to contain it; a vacuum truck should be used to clean up any large spills. LOCATION: In storage room G. NEAREST MEDICAL FACILITY: Employees should know what facilities-are available in case customers or other employees need medical attention: NAME: Mercy Hospital ADDRESS: 2215 Truxton Ave., Bakersfield PHONE NUMBER: 805-327-3371 NEAREST DESIGNATED TRAUMA CENTER: NAME: UCLA Hospital and Clinics ADDRESS: 10833 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles PHONE NUMBER: 213-825-2111 Page 9 of 10 II. All employe~should review the Servicg~tation Monitoring Plan, of which thi~raining plan is a part. S~Fcifically, each employee should understand the procedures--to be used in responding to various kinds of emergencies, and know how to monitor for leaks of hazardous materials. As a supplement to this package, employees should also review the Emergency Response Plan filed by your business to the appropriate local agency. Thirdly, employees should review and have access to the Materials Safety Data Sheets you have on file for each of the hazardous materials stored at the station. III. FIRST AID PROCEDURES (For exposure to gasoline or diesel fuel): A. EYE CONTACT: For direct contact, flush the affected eye(s) with clean water. If irritation or redness develops, seek medical attention. B. SKIN CONTACT: Wipe product from skin and remove soaked clothing. Cleanse affected area(s) thoroughly by washing with soap and water. If irritation develops', and persists, seek medical attention. Do not use solvents or thinners to remove product from skin. C. INHALATION (Breathinq): If symptoms of exposure develop, move victim away from source of exposure and into fresh air. If symptoms persist, seek medical attention. Symptoms include: flushing, blurred vision, dizziness, nausea, headache, drowsiness, loss of coordination, and fatigue. If victim is not breathing or if breathing difficulties develop, artificial respiration or oxygen should be administered by qualified personnel. Seek immediate medical attention. D. INGESTION (Swallowing): DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING BECAUSE GASOLINE CAN ENTER LUNGS AND CAUSE SEVERE LUNG DAMAGE! If victim is conscious and alert, give 2 to 3 cups of milk or water to drink. Seek medical attention. E. For further information, consult the Materials Safety Data Sheets for these products and for other hazardous materials. FIRST AID FOR EXPOSURE TO OTHER MATERIALS: Consult the warning advice on container labels or refer to the MSDS for that product. Page l0 of l0 UNOCAL( ) .l.- QUARTERLY REPORT A Fill out this form quarterly S/S #: BUSINESS NAME: and send in with oll other forms, os applicable. Address: KEEP COPIES OF ALL FORMS YOU MAIL OUT. Quarter # Tank # Capacity (gal) Product Start Dote: End Dote: Year: CHECK ONE BOX BELOW AS APPLICABLE: I hereby certify under the penalty of perjur'y that oil product level variations for this facility were within allowable limits for this quarter. ("NO" in cloumn 12, Inventory Reconciliation Shee~; "NO" in column 7, Tank Gouging Sheet; "OK" in oli applicable columns of the Doily Visual Monitoring Log). ---] Inventory variation at this facility exceeded the allowable limits for this quarter. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the source for the variation(s) not due to on unauthorized (leak) release. ("YES" to any Of the above). There was on unauthorized (leak) release at this facility during this quarter. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that oil necessary corrective actions hove been or ore being token. [ DEALER' S SIGN ATU RE/DATE: LIST DATE, TANK # AND AMOUNT FOR ALL VARIATIONS THAT EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE LIMITS: DATE TANK # AMOUNT THIS QUARTERLY REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATING LOCAL AGENCY WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE END OF EACH QUARTER: QUARTER 1 JANUARY-MARCH I submit by April 15 QUARTER 2 APRIL-JUNE I Submit by July 15 QUARTER 3 JULY-SEPTEMBER Submit by October 15 QUARTER 4 OCTOBER-DECEMBER . Submit by January 15 UNOCAL(~) Sl~R!Ul s,~o~adSUl ~.- ~ ~Z soua~8 azaaJ~]~u~ I~0 Joa9 9~ ~UOl ~ ~ ~ ~uoi .~ o ~ ~ ~ uoi ~ A ~ ~uo1 ~' ~uo1 ~ ~uoi ~ ,,,. ~ ~ ~ L~ ~ ~uoi ~ ~ t~ ~uoi ~ ~uoi m L~ ~uoi UNOCAL I ii C INVENTORY'RECONCILIATIOI Fill out this ' form daily IS/S #: 8u~ine~ Name: I and ~end it with the , IOuarter: Tank .: } Quarterly Year: Cap o c il: y/Con ten ts: Rep art. o ne i" ,n c:oc 0 u-~ ~ + I I I I I I ~ I I I I II I i I I I I I~ I I I I I I, I I I I I I II I I I C 0 ~ eZ UNOCAL WASTEOIL TANK GAUGING SH D IS/S #: Business Nome:, I Fill out this form weekly and send it I Ad dress:, , with the Year: Capacity:_., Report. GAUGING PERIOD INVENTORY VARIATIONS L. 1 2 ,3 4 5 6 7 Opening Closing Actual Allowable Allowable FROM TO Dipstick Dipstick Variation Variation Variation Reading Reading (4-3) * * m Date/Time Date/Time Inchest Gal. Inches, Gal. Gallons Gallons Yes/No ,Allowable variation is based on tank size: Tank Size Allowql~le Variation 280 gallons 2.8 gallons 520 gallons 5.0 gallons 550 gallons 5.0 gotlons **if you answered "Yes" in column ? (Col. 6 > Col. 5), then an unauthorized release (leak) shall be assumed to have occurred. Follow the Release Evaluation checklist and attach to this form. UNOCALi )e RELEASE EVALUATION CHECKLIST S/S #: Business Name: qll out this form Address: ~henever the 311owable variQt[or Tank #: CapocitF. is exceeded and Product: send in with the Date & Time Allowable Variation was. Exceeded: Quarterly Report. CHECK OFF EACH STEP AS IT IS COMPLETED. STEP l lE~RECORDS REVIEWED Date/Time: Should be done I Performed by: within 2 hours. :- STEP NEW RECONCILIATION Dote/Time: Should be done -- PERFORMED Performed by:. within 24 hours. STEP 31 CALL UNOCAL, REP. AND Date/Time: Should be done --SEND UNAUTHORIZED Performed by:. within 24 hours. RELEASE REPORT TO REP. STEP ,~IE~RECORDS REVIEWED FROM Dote/Time: Should be done I LAST STATIC STATION Performed bF. within 24 hours. (BY DEALER OR REP.) " STEP 51 [-'-] PHYSICALLY INSPECT Date/Time: Should be done FACILITY FOR EVIDENCE Performed by: within 2 doys. °I OF LEAKS STEP 6 [----] DISPENSER METER D(~te/Time: Should be done CALIBRATION CHECKED Performed by:. within 5 d~ys. (COMPLETE TEST REPORT) TEST PERFORMED ON PIPING Performed by:. within 4 days. STEP 81[~']PRECISION TANK TEST Date/Time: Should be done I PERFORMED Performed by: within 5 days. STEP 91E~]ADDIT1ONAL INVESTIGAllON Dote/Time: Should be done PERFORMED AS REQUIRED Performed by. within 5 doys. Briefly describe the reoson the allowable variation was exceeded: I hereb, y certify this is to be a 'true and accurate report. Oeoler's Signature: Bate:, U ocJu. O · UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE REPORT S/S #: Business .Name: I Complete thi~ form Address: J in the event of q ~onfirmed leak or Tank #: Copacit)c I lill and send to ~ur Uno¢~t rep. Product: I ~ithin 24 hour~. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE 0EALER Date leek wes discovered: Approximate date leek began' 0escribe fully the cause of the leek: How wes the leak discovered? TO BE COMPLETED BY THE UNOCAL RETAIL REPRESENTATIVE Has the leak been stopped? Date: How wes the leak stopped? List resourc¢$ affected: Y¢~ No ._Threatened # of wetl~ Soil Creek or Storm drains Buildings or Utility Vaults Groundwater Public Drinking Water Private Drinking Water Agricultural Other Instructions to Unocal Retail Reoresentotives: This form taus{ be forwarded to Unocal Maintenance & Construction Department j IMMEDIATELY so they can submit to the appropriate local egency within 5 days of discovery of any leak. UNOCAL( ) EQUIPMENT TEST LOG G $/S #: Business Name: Fill out this Address: form for each annual Con tractor: inspection Name of person completing' test(s): and keep on Signature: file. Dealer's Signature: Check off each test when performed: 1. ~ Shear Valye Inspections - Date: [2.[--'] Blending Valve Inspections - Dote: 3. F--] Leak Detector Product Model Leak Full Line Pressure (PSI1 Simulated Line Leak Test Inspection Detector Open Max. 12 Close Min. 26 Pass .Foil Dote Super Unleaded Unleaded Diesel Other 4. ['~ Dispenser Meter Calibration Procedure: 1. Before starting calibration runs, wet the calibration can with product and return product to storage. 2. Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 5.. Run 5 gallons with nozzle one-half open. into the can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 4. If the volume measured in a 5-gallon .calibration can is more than 6 cubic inches above or below the 5-gallon mark, the meter requires calibration by a registered device repairman. Fast Flow Slow Flow Vol. Returned Calibration Date/time Nozzle #1Product 5-Gal. Draft 5-Gal. Draft to storage Required? Gallons Gal. Cu.ln. Gal. Cu.ln. YES,/NO ,Note date of Calibration & Device(s) used: UNOCJIL~ SAFETY TRAINING LOG H Address: I EPlPLOYEES MUST SION THIS FORM TO PROVE THEY RECEIVED THEIR ANNUAL. SAFETY TRAINING. Date of Initial Employee Nome Training Dotes of Annual Refresher Training ow Canyon Place, Suite 400 P.O. Box 5155 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone (415) 277-2310 Fax (415) 277-2309 UNOCAL ) , Tony Yap Maintenance Representative al i fornla No~l~lern Division 9 91 .~,C,~ ~-~----~ TO: A.D. YAP FOLDA UNDERGROUND TANKS COUNTY OF KERN Tony, would you please provide the information requested for the attached Environmental Health Services Department's questionaire. Attachment cc 137-Tanks General RANDALL L. ABBOTT ' ' - '~' STEVE McCAS t l:y, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR .' ' ': ,' ..... .,. ' ' ' ' . . Air Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE III .:r ,~ ~,,,~ ......, WILLIAM J. RODDY. APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR " "'?'.":" .... Planning & Devetoome~t Services Department ~ ,JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Underground Storage Tank Owners DATE: December 27, 1990 RE:' Deadline for upgrade requirements for your underground tank facility Dear Sir/Madam: , Our records indicate that you own at least one underground storage tank which has fuel distributed through pressurized product lines. Recent changes in state and federal regulations require that ali pressurized piping must be equipped with an automatic line leak detection system bY December 22, 1990, and tightness tested annually. These requirements are more fully described in the code of Federal Regulations, part ~.80 and 281; California's Health and Safety Code as modified in October 1989; and California's Draft Regulations for underground storage tanks. In addition the equipment that is to be installed at your facility must be able to alert the owner or operator of the presence of a leak, by restricting or shutting off the flow of hazardous substance through the piping, or by triggering an audible or visual alarm. It must detect leaks of three gallons or more per hour at 10 pounds per square inch line pressure within one hour, as certified by the manufacturer. Your facility may require modification to remain in compliance with local and federal guidelines for operation of the underground storage tank system. If you have installed automatic line leak detection equipment, please take a few minutes to complete the questionnaire enclosed, and return it to the Environmental Health Services Department within 14 days. If you have not installed such equipment, you may obtain information from service station equipment companies on the cost and types of equipment available which will meet the performance standard described. Verification of compliance will be evaluated during the course of routine inspections. The Department is currently working 'on' the final permit requirements for your facility which will specify monitoring alternatives based on your environmental setting; those permits and their conditions will be issued next year. The Department is currently working on updating our local ordinance to meet the minimum guidelines specified within the new state.~egulations, currently in draft form. As in this letter we will advise you in writing of requirements which will affect your facility, and assist you in obtaining information to comply with those requirements. Please continue prompt payment of permit fees and feel free to call the Kern County Environmental Health Permitting and Inspections Program if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~ .. ~ _ , ... ~f ,1 , Hazardousi~aterials ~ecialiSt Hazardous Materials Management Program ^EG:ch green\deaaline 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805~ 861-3636 PERMIT NUMSER ~?OOO TYPE OF INSTALLATION ( ) 1. In-Tank Level Sensor (/2. Leak Detector ( ) 3. Fill Box 'FACILITY ADDRESS 1. IN TANK LEVEL SENSORS Number of Tanks List By Tank ID Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer 2. LEAK DETECTORS Number of Tanks ~ List By Tank ID q~-~d;P~f~ ~/A~, ~,~/, " ~7- ~.~. '~,~, Name of System ~O ~]~T-~ ~7~~ Manufacturer R Model Number Contractor/Installer S. FILL BOXES Number of Tanks List By Tank ID Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer 0WNER/0PERATOR :-: ....... DATE LCI LIQUID CONSTRUCTION, INC. July 6, 1990 90~5128 Unocal Corporation PO Box 5155 San Ramon,.CA 94583 Attn: Tony Yap Re: Unocal ~1367, 1501Brundage Lane, Bakersfield, CA. Dear Tony: On June 8, 1990, a Petro Tlte System Test was performed at the 'above-referenced location. The test was performed by.George Yarbrough,. LCI Technician. The NFPA Code 329.02 criteria for a tight system is a maximum loss the almost infinite variables involved, this is not intended to be a mathematical tolerance and is not the permission of actual leakage. During the stand-pipe, test procedures the Internal liquid hydrostatic pressure applied, to the underground tank system is generally two to three times greater than normal liquid storage pressures. This increase in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indicated rate of leak accordingly. SYSTEM TEST Tank No. 3 - West Size - 550 Gallons Product - Waste Oil The test showed a minus .016 gallons per hour. Based on t~e above criteria, we find the tank tested mathematically tight. This concludes our test findings. If you have any questions regarding the results, please contact me. For your convenience a copy of the test results has been sent to the County. We have enjoyed working with you on this project. If you need any further information, please feel free to call. Regards, ~ ~ ' Tank Testi'n{3 Coordinator MY/rk enclosures 1054 North 'J' Street · Post Office Box 1220 · Tulare, California 93275 ° (209) 688-1980 .... ata Chart for Tank System Tightness Test PLE^SE Pm.T ~ N~me Addres~ R~M~lative '-' Tel~one Tank(s) Name 3. REASON FOR ~~~~5%' . (fix~l/i~ Fully) 4. WHO REQUESTEO ~ ~ manif~ tanks 6. INSTALLATION 5° DATA /,, 7. UNDERGROUNO ,. ,.0.., .... ,~ ,..k? WATER 8. FILL-UP T,.~,,o ARRANGEMENTS .... :."" ],!' ~.' for notice or im:lul~/ Cam [~rl~ Ni~e 9. CONTRACTOR, MECHANICS, 10. OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Te~t. weee ma<la on the above te~k systems i~ accordance with te~t I~ure~ preecflb~d fol' 11. TEST RESULTS -. Name o! Supplier. Owner or Dialer A(:l~rall No. and Streelfl) City ~lte Date of T~I 15. ~ANK T0 TEST 15a. BRIEF DIAGRA~ 0F TANK FIELD 16. CAPACITY F,o~ ~er 17. FILL-UP FOR TEST Io '~" ~ T~k D~ter 18. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS TANK D w,,., ,. ,.., ~ u..,,) .,.g ,.,.d .,n LVLLT ion o~ ~ ~.< .,~.m. ~..~ ~ ....... ~o,., ~.,.. 19. TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR ~, ~.o ,~. o .... ~ ..pl~ ~o ~o~....*~ ~.u. TS~ ASSEMBLY 21. VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM ~p~me ~n ~ow' ~om of ~n~ to gr~e' ~ ~ in. A,= ~- ~o, ~,ro~..y ........................... 30 ~.. 24b. COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION 1. Is tour ~una ,u,e ,.u,red? Yfl ~ ~ ~ Tol.l lubing t .... hie -- ..proximat .......... / /_~ ,.. RECIPROCAL METHOD Ty~ of ~u~ ........................................ 20. EXTENSION HOSE SE~ING ~ 0?2 ..SI. ~tend~.~.uctiontu~6"o .... . -; A.erOir~.t~'''~'"""'"'""' ~ 77 3.. ....... , ..~ o,,.., ~ ~ W .............. .............. ~ t~k top ...................................... ' In. 22. Z~,m.-~..o, ,.."~.~ ."., .~,.u~.,~./ 7 ~ /,Z ~.,,*~ .~-) ......................................... ~/~ dig~i ~n dig,s ~T.nk,,.. , ~ ~ ' ~"' COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION'(Complete after circulation) ~7 24a. Corre~ed A.P.I. Gravity Total quanl~ tull ~nk (16or 1~ Ihil tank b~T ES: 24C. FOR TESTING WITH WATER ~se~ed ~ple Tem~rature ......................... 'F ~rre~ed AP.I. Gr~i~ Water T~rature ~F, From Table A ........ T~ C ................................................ ~ a~ ca~lat~ are to ~ ~ f~ d~ ~11 c~dftlo~ tO lot In~lv~ ~u~ T~ D ~lish a ~lt~e prate ~, or w~n ~lng t~ f~r ~und From Ta~e B .......................... m~*~ ~te f~ ~ ~n~ Of ~ud~ wm~ In t~ ~k Tr~sf~ COE to Line 2~. ~ ~ ~ ,o N.f.P.A. ~, ~*o~ 2-~=4 ~u ~7.~ ~d ~ ,..k 25. (a) . {b) mwfl~urer r~mding iIIow~e I~t~ tm! pr~ur~. T~iI Qu~tl~ I0 ~ffici~t of e~l~ for ~ume ~ In ~il ~k ~1 ~k (16 o¢ 17) In~v~ pr~u~ 28 .. . 29 s, I ,,,~,, .~3 So~.~'/, ~,,~Z~o-~. ' ......... ]" ........ I ".: ....... "":""~ ..... 7"'"' ...... ~ '~" .... '" ' ............. . ]g.'~ ~ ARRIVED AT TEST SITE AN[) MEkSURE~) FOI WATEF'. ON TANK BOI~OM ~ I F~JJ R'A= ( .~o~)' I~'-TRANSPORT fRUCK TOPPED ~)FP F~Nb ~ VENfo~F~%~Ud: ': Z~ .o~ I~ e~u~ tes~ 'e~u~P~e~t ~'~ P~)~ucti~P p~eo a~ ~U~ti~N°, ' - ":"'-' ' i~ .... , ................ ~ ............. I~.o~ starT sensor rea~N~ Z ~;~ '~,Z)~',~o ~.o~0 ~o~ ~'~ i~z'~l, , I?:Ay CONTI,NUE H~pH LEVEL TES.'2_ ~.~ 42~ I ' 42" I m , I~L. .... ~ -~t-7'~ ~ ~ ' ~ ,.~ .... 42" ........... ' _ ~ . . 42" ' / ....... 4~,, .................. ' '- I ......... ~ I---Z ...... ~_ ' . ~,~ b~Op z0 ~0~ ~v~b /-"/ ~'-- /' ~oo ' / z~o~ / - /' /' ' / me./ ~:~o ........ -, ~,,~ ............................ , ..... _~_, ........ z: ..... .._- ......... ~ .............. '~,,~F ,,7~- ......... .............................. ~ ...................................... ~ ........................ ~__ ~._ !?_ ,..5.~TL =~Z~. '~._~ .FS_& ~Z~... t=o~.__ - ,:,~, ;.o, ~ .,. I~o:,~ ,T ~ 12" ~o ,~o>~ ,,.2,.~ ~oq tI~ ,.oz~ ,.,~<,, :~o~T :.: ~ CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TES-'I~ ]~o'.3Y II? I~o':.,e >'~ Ix.l 1~" ~,~TOI 9¢o -.,",'~ &Gq I,,,s ~4,o~(i i ~ ~.o~ I~ ' I,~ :~, '- .~'--zT' ;'~ --~,x- ~-6-.-~ ~o' ~7o7,S-' ~ S O' , ,..4-'.~,~:~w-'7 ,,,, ,'; _,oo~' ~ ~ : F ........................ ..7' ~'.~[~~0 Low ~.Z~S: . I .... M -~, ~1 12~ , 0 ~ · ~rm ~ 41G 4z~' .,~..)7 .,o~ ' . ~ , , .~ ~ ~.~t ~ ....... 7 ~ .... 7 ' .. I' · ~ :.l .............. SITE & TANK EVALUATION TANK & ASSOC EQUIPMENT , TANK TANK SIZE TU~INE SIZE ~,o{~' MONITORING PREPARED FOR SUCTION SYSTEM SIPHONED SYSTEM PRESSURE SYSTEM EXPOSED ELEC. ~ANK PIT AREA C0~ENTS LCI CoNstrUCTION,' ]NC. COHPLETION OF t,K)RK STATEMENT JOB NUMBER c~c~ ~-:~--I g ~' ALL TERNS AND CONDITIONS. OF SAID CONTRACT BETWEEN LIQUID CONSTRUCTION INC. ANO(y_J///,'_~. /'~/fT/~)/~')~ HAVE.BEEN COtIPLETED SATISFACTORILY. COHPLETEO WORK 'i/AS INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY./,,,2///i''L'm j,~'~/7~"~,~x.,' ~"7''-. INSPECT[ON.OF . -- Owner~Ag'eht ~ i · . COHP. LETED WORK WAS WITNESSED 8Y THE CONSTRUCTION FOREHAN OF LIQUIO CONSTRUCTION INC. CONSTRUCT'ION ,.FORE/~N - LC I OWNER/AGENT~./~ --- . - ~///' ITEMS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED ACCORDING TO SAID CONTRACT BE'P.4EEN LIQUID CONSTRUCTION AND OW~r/Ag~n~ 1. Date,Completed 2. Date Completed 3. Date Completed Date Completed 5- Date Completed ALL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED SATISFACTORILY AS SPECIFIED IN SAIO CONTRACT 8ETMEEN LIQUI0 CONSTRUCION INC. AND " Owner/Agent DATE: CONSTRUCTION FOREMAN- LCi DATE: O~NER/AG~NT .0BE.T .. LEE & ASS0C AT S, ~J00 Larkspur Landing Circle LARKSPUR, CALIFORNI'A 94939 (415) 461-8890 WE ARE SENDING Y6U 'l~Attached [] Under separate cover via the following items: [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples r"l Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order ~ C-~P'F OF p~lkl~.. ~ ~'AI~ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~For approval [] Approved as submitted FI Resubmit copies for approval [] For your use [] Approved as noted [] Submit~copies for distribution X As requested [] Returned for corrections [] Return corrected prints [] For review and comment [] -~ [] FOR BIDS DUE 19__ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS [~.,a[~ H~. ~ ~T'~--~ j · 'TH^~r.- ¥oq v~'k="l' M~--.+t ./ coPY TO RO61~l~ F~I. PA.~ L, INoc4c. I SIGNED: ([~.~ ~, ~ Dispenser Pan '~" i~3 Part Numb.r W L O 1020 18" x 39" w/one connector included for one pipe 18" 39" 6" MPC Containment 9ysteme Ltd. Chicago, Illinois MAY 0~ '88 I~:58 FHEHCO TULARE P.i×~ .HI~--__~HLI'NE AND TRIM_,L...INE FIXED BLENDERS O HICHLINE (OR TRIMLINE) FIXED BLENDERS i - TWO OR MORE HIGHLINE OR TRIMLINE FIXED BLENDERS AT ONE SITE ALLOWS THREE OR MORE PRODUCTS FROM ',,.,.,_~.. TWO TANKS [ONE PRODUCT PER AVAILABLE HOSE). MAY 0~ '~ 1S:00 TULARE PRESSURE EOU'ALIZlNCu VALVE Outlet ~'~ Prod uat 'C' Manifold Oheak Valves '0' Ring 0rlflae '0' Ring Valve Sleeve Inlet Inlet Proctuot 'A' Product '1~' Va Ive Piston Liner Equalizing Piston O SIZING OF ORIFICES IN ORIFICE PLATE DETERMINES BLEND RATIO. O EQUALIZING PISTON ADJUSTS POSITION TO APPROPRIATELY EQUALIZE THE PRESSURE OF PRODUCT A AND PRODUCT B AS THEY APPROACH THE ORIFICE PLATES. THE VALVE IS THEREFORE SELF-CORRECTING FOR NORMAL. VARIATIONS IN SYSTEM PRESSURE, INTEGRAL CHECK VALVE PREVENTS PRODUCT CONTAMINATION IN UNDERGROUND TANKS. ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ' PLANNING ENGINEERING 900 L.ARKSPUR L.,ANOING CIRCLE, #1~'5, LARKSPUR, CA 94939 · (415] 461-B890 March 8, 1988 Ms. Ann Boyce Kern County Dept. of Env. Health 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 RE:. UNOCAL SERVICE STATIONS KERN COUNTY JOB #1284 MINOR PIPE MODIFICATIONS AND BLEND VALVE iNSTALLATION Dear Ms. Boyce: On behalf of Unocal 76 we are submitting these plans and fee of $1800.00 ($100.00 per facility) for minor piping modifications at each Unocal leased service station within your jurisdiction: S.S. #1367 - Bakersfield S.S. #7048 - Bakersfield #3507 - Bakersfield #7225 - Bakersfield #3609 -Bakersfield #4669 - Delano #3655 - Bakersfield #5334 - Greenfield #4888 - Bakersfield #4734 - Lebec #5488 - Bakersfield #5895 - Lost Hills #5573 - Bakersfield #5716 - Oildale #6089 - Bakersfield #3596 - Ridgecrest #6106 - Bakersfield #2989 - Taft These modifications will be minimal, involving about 0-10% of the total existing piping system which is currently monitored with Red Jacket leak detectors. Providing these changes and installing a U.L. listed "Blend Valve" within selected dispensers will allow the service station dealer to provide an additional 'gasoline product to the customer. We are requesting at this time a variance from secondary containment requirements on these minor modifications. Please see our formal letter, attached. Please review these plans and advise this office of your approval. The installation contractor has been~given responsibility for obtaining and meeting all other local permits and requirements. BRANCHEB; PETALUMA, CA ~07] 7~-1~0 BACRAMENTO, CA [~1~) ~46-4Q03 ~HOENIX, AZ {60E! 495-1~;0 Page Two · March 8, 1988' Ms. Ann Boyce As per your conversation with Paul Yamamoto of our office, the Contractor will be installing a pan under the dispensers. As our client has developed a very rigid schedule, any assistance you can provide us in expediting your processing would be greatly appreciated. We will be available to assist you with any and all questions you might have at (415) 461-8890. Please advise us when permits are ready to be picked up. No As-Builts should be required as all construction will be as designed. Again, your assistance is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSQCIATES, INC. David M. Solomon Project Designer DMS/cz cc: Roger Folda, Unocal ROBERT H. LEE r. ABBOCIATEB " ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. - ...': ..'.::* "*.-'t.-:-'.'.."i'. :* 900 Larkspur Landing Circle '* *'"" ":*~'* ':'.' Suite 125 *"*: .~: .:.'*-'' ':': .... · ': LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 · . :.t. - ' _ . .;' ~-,., ' (415) 461-8890 '...ff ....;..';:-.)..'t:, --- .... ,' .~ '"" *;~"-~ ... . ?. ' . .', -? ~:. .(.'- :7: .: /t -. ~'~. ·. '.~::.' .... ~ ,..,.. ......... : ~ · . ... :,.:- ':..(-~ ....... ',7' . . . ..'[ . ", ".'.i ~ - .' ~ ~~%.......~-~J.,.~.....~.~_~~...a.~.:_~.~.~...._~ ~~_~.~.....~.....~...~~ ................ ' ~ PLEASE REPLY ~ NO REPLY NECES$ARY I -' i~(ERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPA. TME~ 2700~M Street - HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Mailing Address: .* ~ ~:~.,~ 1415 Truxtun Avenue DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Bakersfield, California 93304 . , Vernon S. Reichard (805) 861-3636 PER'lIT TO CONSTRUCT PERNIT NIJ'MBER #270006M UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY ~~~ FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NA~E/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: Unocal #1367 Unocal Liquid Construction, Inc. 1501Brundage Lane 1275 N. California Street 1054 No. "J" Street Bakersfield, CA Walnut'Creek, CA 94596 Tulare, CA 93274 License #4960119 NEW BUSINESS { PERMIT EXPIRES April 27, 1989 CHANGE OWNERSHIP RENEWAL [ APPROVAL DATE ~ April 27,_19e~q~ OTHER ................... POST ON PREMISES. . .' ................ '. . · CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This permit applies only to the modification of an existing facility Involving extending product piping near tile unleaded dispenser and installing a blending valve. 2. Ail construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. 3. All equipment and materials in this construction must be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. 4.. Backfill material for piping and tanks to be as per manufacturers' specifications. 5. Construction inspection record card is included with permit given to ~ Permtttee. Thls card must be posted at jobslte prior t'o Initial inspection. Permltteee must contact Permitting Authorlty and arrange for each group of required Inspections numbered as per instructions on card. Generally, Inspections will. be made of: a. Extended piping system - b. Leak interception pan c. Leak detection/monitoring d. Any other inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority. 6. Ail underground metal connections (e.g. piping, fittings, fill pipes) to tank(s) must be electrically isolated, and wrapped to a minimum 20 mil thickness with corrosion-preventive, gasoline-resistant tape or otherwise protected from corrosion. DISTRICT OFFICES Oelano · Lamont · Lake Isabella · Mojave * Ridgecrest ,· Shafter · Taft PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND PERMIT NUMBER 270006M STORAGE FACILITY ADDENDUM 7. Liner pan shall be installed by a trained exp~rlencd liner contractor and installation at site approved by the Permitting Authority. 8. Permltt~e must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with 48 hour advance notice. 9. Monitoring requirements for this facility will be described on final' "Permit to Operate." 10. "As Built" Construction Drawings are to be submitted to the Kern County Health Department upon completion of Installation at.this site. KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1700 FLOWER STREET ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SECTION PHONE (805) 861-3636 . IKSPECr20N BECO~m POST CAR~) AT JoBsrn~ ~0~o. ' - - - - ~o~o. F~/~>~/~5 ~ ~~, ~ ' INSTRUCTIONS: Please call for an inspector only when each group of inspections with the same number are ready. They will run in consecutive order beginning with number 1. DO NOT cover work for an9 numbered group until all items in that .group are signed off by the Permitting Authority. Following these instructions will reduce the number of required inspection visits and therefore prevent assessment of additional fees. - TANKS & BACKFILL - INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ~Backfill of Tank(s) , ISpark Test Certification [Cathodic Protection of Tank(s) - PIPING SYSTEM - / IPiping & Raceway w/Collection Sump ICorrosion Protection of PipinS Joints Fill Plpe~ , IElectrical Isolation of PipinS From Tank(s) ~ ', ICathodic Protection System-PipinS ' ' - SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, OVERFILL PROTECTION, LEAK DETECTION - [Liner Installation - Tank(s) ' ' ~Liner Installation - Pi,pinS IVault With Product Compatible Sealer ,' ,' ILevel Gauges or Sensors, Float Vent Valves ~Product Compatible Fill Box(es) [Product Line Leak Detector(s) [ ', ',Leak Detector(s) for Annular Space-D.W. Tank(s) ,' ,' . IMonitorinS Well(s)/Sump(s) ~ ', ILeak Detection Device(s) For Vadose/Groundwater , , IPVC Sleeve PipinS ILeak Detector(s) : ~.~_ { ~, ' - FINAL - /~Monitorin$ Wells, Caps & Locks ~ Monitorin~ Requirements I , FINAL INSPEC~rION CItECKLIST Plot Diagram Plot plan notes Yes No 1. All new and existing tanks located on plot plan? '~ 2. Does tank product correspond to product labels on .'". plot plan? .. 3. Was there no modifications ideutifled which were not depicted on the plot.plans? :.:. If "No" described . free 'of water and 4 A~e monitoring ~ells secure and · Yes No 6. Are Red Jacket subpumps and all line .leak detector I~/ IZ[ accessible? Type of line leak detector if any 7. Overfill containment box as specified on aPplication? If "No", what type and model number: a) Is fill box tightly sealed around fill tube? I-I ~ b) is access over water tight? 121 C) Is product present in fill box? I-I a) Are manual monitoring instruments, .product~nd~ 11 I I_1 '.ater finding paste on premises? ~ ~_JG ~~,- b) Is the fluid level in Owens-Corning liquid level monitoring reservoir and alarm panel in proper operating condition? c) Does the annular space or secondary containment -~]-] liner leak detection system have self diagnostic capabilities? If "Yes", is it functional If "No", how is it tested for proper operating condition? 9. Notes on any abnormal conditions: LC LIQUID CONSTRUCTION, INC. July 19, 1989 ~ony Yap Unocal Corporation 2175 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek, Ca. 94596 ~Re: Unocal ~1367, 1501Brundage Lane, Bakersfield, Ca. Dear Mr. Yap: On July 3, 1989 a Petro Tire System Test was performed at the above-referenced location. The test was performed by George Yarbrough, LCI Technician. The NFPA Code 329.02 criteria for a tight system is a maximum loss of .05 gallons per hour. Because of the almost infinite variables involved, this is not intended to be a mathematical tolerance and is not the permission of actual leakage. During the stand-pipe test procedure the internal liquid hydrostatic pressure applied to the underground tank system is generally two to three times greater than normal liquid storage pressures. This increase -in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indicated rate of leak accordingly. SYSTEM TEST Tank No. 3 - South Size - 550 gallons Product - Waste Oil The test showed a minus .Oll gallons per hour. Based on the above criteria, we find the tank tested mathematically tight. This concludes our test and findings. If you have any questions regarding the results, please contact me. For your convenience a copy of the test results has been sent to the- County. We have enjoyed working with you on this project. If you need any further information, please feel free to call. Regards, Mark B. Yamamoto Tank Testing Coordinator MBY/amf enclosure 1054 North 'J' Street · Post Office Box 1220 ° · Tulare, California 93275 ° (209) 688-1980 Data Chart for Tank System Tightness Test PL~_ASE PRINT 1. OWNER ~,,w["~ Unocal Corporation 2175 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek, Ca. 94596 r,~,,,, [] ~am~3nocal Corporation ^~T~5 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek. Ca. 945q6 ~ OPERATOR Unocal #1367 1501 Brundage lane Bakersfield, C~. 805-325-4141 3. REASON FOR 1EST To test system for tightness {E.xo~in Fully) 4. WHO REQUESTED, Tony Yap 7/3/89 me C~m. pan¥ or Affiliatlg~ IEST AND WHEN ~ocal Corporation r~'~75' N. California ~±vd. walnut Creek, C%~: 94596 ~ manifolded tatlka 7. UNOERGROUNO Telephone Company . Name TMe~flone 9. CONTRACTOR. - MECHANICS. any ottter contractor 10. OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Te~ta were made on the al:x3~e tank syatm'na'ln accor~,~nce with t~t p~ pr~ for 11. TEST RESULTS 1Z SENSOR 13. CERTIFICATION o,. ~.~.:,m~.~ ~,, ~/Vg//&~ P.O. Box 1220 Tulare, Ca. 93274 ~ii 14. Unocal ~/1367 1501 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, Ca. 7/3/89 Name of Supplier, Owner or Dealer Addres~ No. and Street(s) City,State Date et Te~l il 15. TANK TO TEST 15a. BRIEF DIAGRAM OF TANK FIELD 16. CAPACITY ~,om ~--1 Station Churl .?~ Idenllly by position G~llons Company Engineering ~iand and Grade cnpnclly chat available ?;t ' ' :-, 17. FILL-UP FOR TEST ".] *fOre rill-up ltl. In. ' .... 'Dry [.~ ~ ~" ~ Gallons ~ank DI. meler 18, SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES T0 TEST THIS TANK ~ Water In lank ~ Llneis) being lesled wilh LVLLT ~j -~-& __~.. m .... ~ ..... ,,o*.*,. ,.,,, ........ ,o. ,,, ,.,,. 19. TANK MEASUREMENIS FOR T,amsfer IDler lo line .,.~ TSTT ASSEMBLY 21. VAPOR RECOVERY SYSIEM ~:~ ~ 30" ,or "r' ,,ob. ,,,v ............ ' ............... 30 ,.. 24b. COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION ':}~' /T~__~. 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING ,y,. o, P,od.c, ........................................ .::~.~ 2. Hetghl ~o 12" mark I~om ~tom o~ ~ank ~ In. -~/ ~ [~ ~ank lop to grade' , ................................. ~drometel Employed .................................. H ,.,,, .... .,*,,omo,,... ............... ,... ~:.~ 2~. l~m.~-Sens~ ~e~ding ell~ cl~tatton ,:~'~ diails ' "¥' 23. *~0". ~., '~' .... ~. o, ,,~.c,~ ~h,... n~,~,o~,, COEFFICIENT 0F EXPANSION (C0mplele aller circulali0n) . ~0 24a.Co..ct.d A.P.L G~avlly Tol~ ~u~tlly In R~tpr~el Volume chsngs In ::.:...~ 24c. FOR 1ESTING WITH WATER ,, ~,u, c ~ o ~ ;~ Corrected A.P.I. Gravity ....;j ~ ~*F, F~om Table A. Table C ................................................. '...~ The above cetculetT~s are to ~ used lot d~ soil conditions to Io~ Involved ~t~ct Tab~ O ................................................. . '~ establish ~ ~sltlve pressure advantage, or w~en using Ihs ~our ~und ............................................ Ref. ,o ..F.P.A. 30. Secllon, 2-32.4 and 2-7.2 end Ihs tank 25. ~) . (bi manuteclurer regarding allowable system lest pressures. T~al quRnttty In C~fllctonl o1 expansion for Volome change In this tank ~ull lank {16 or Ir) Involved product per 'F 26. ...... , .... = oeec LIQUID CONSTRUCTION INC TANK TEST READINGS (3) South 550 gallon Waste Oil Tank :CUSTOMER Unocal STATION NUMBER 1367 STATION ADDRESS 1501Brundage Lane CITY/STATE Bakersfield, Ca. TEST DATE 7 / 3 ~9 '~. ~ HYDROSTATIC ~ VOLUME MEASUREMENTS (V) TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION I~NET VOLUME ~ACCUMULATED~ ~age 4 ~N~OR CALIBRATION 79 ./ 80 ~ PRESSURE CONTROL ,,'' RECORD TO .001 GAL USE FACTOR (A) :~CHANGE EACH:: CHA~GEJul~89 - LOG OF TEST PROCEDURES ~ STANDPIPE LEVEL ,,'' PRODUCT IN : PRODUCT : ,', ......... ,, (LO~ ............................................. : IN INCHES :i GRADUATE :REPLACED :COMF, UTATIONIiTEMF'ERATURE:I LEVEL) '' DATE :RECORD DETAILS OF SETTINGI :i ................... i| ............................. OF :, ADJUSTED } UP AND RUNNING TEST :: ' (USE FULL LENGTH READING !iBESINNINGiToLEVEL THERMAL EXPANSION :,- .......... ......... ,, OF WHICH :~ BEFORE AFTER RRODUCT SENSOR NET . OR :~ VOLUME - .~ TIME OF LINE IF NEEDED) NUMBER,': READING :RESTORED ,,'' READING READING :RECOVERED~ READING CHANGE :CONTRACTION:: E×P/CONTR 16:~0~Arrived at si%e: Took %ank burial measurements: Checked ~or Wa~er~ Please no~e: In %be yen% air/vaoor %ook inven%ory o~ produc% on hand: :Prepared area {or %es%ing se% up. Pocke%s were presen~ in ~he %ank/system. It c~uld nave an e~ect on ~he tes~ readings. ~Delivery truck arrived: Assis%ed driver in ~illing ~ank. 18:00 :Se~ up ~es~ s~and and s~ar%ed circulating pump, bled air 15.00 :Minu~es'circula%ing %ime. FACTOR = 0.0008 18:15 ~FIRST HIGH LEVEL : I~ :~ 0.100 18,556 ~ ~SENSOR READING ~ ~ |l ~ : 18:30 ~CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST~ I ~ ~.6 ~E.O i (~.I'1]0. . 0.1S0 0.0~0 18,636 80 0.064 : (0.0~4)'',, 18:45 :CONTINUEB HIGH LEVEL TESTI 2 I, 48.8 48.0 ~: O.IE' 0.170 ~'~.0~0. 18,714 78 ,.' 0.06~ : (0.028),,'' 19:00 ICONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST: 3 : 4~.8 ~.0 ;I 0.170 0.~10 0.040 18,7'30 76 ~.061 : 19:15 ICONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST q ~ ~8.9 48.0 i: 0.810 0.255 0.045 18,SE.4 74 (3.059 : (0.01~) ~ :CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST 5,,'' ~8.0 : ,,'' -.: ~CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TESTI 6,,'' 48.0 ICONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST 7,,'' q8.O I : '' :CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TESTI 8,,'' ~8.0 ~ :CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TESTI 10 II ICONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST~ 11 ,,'' ,,'" '"' ICONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TESTI 13 ,,'' II ,'' ' IFINISH HIGH LEVEL TEST 14 II Il I ', LIQUID CONSTRUCTION INC TANK TEST READINGS : . · (3) South 550 gaiion Waste Oil Tank [ ' ;CUSTOMER Unocal STATION NUMBER 1367 STATION ADDRESS 1501 Brundage lane CITY/STATE Bakersfield, Ca. TEST DATE 7 / 3 /89 I HYDROSTATIC VOLUME MEASUREMENTS (V) ~ TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION INET VOLUME ACCUMULATED I SENSOR CALIBRATION 79 / 80 ~ PRESSURE CONTROL RECORD TO .001 GAL ~I USE FACTOR (A) ~CHANGE EACH CHANGE ............................................. : ................................................ :, ........... -- ................... | READING LOG OF TEST PROCEDURES~ ~ STANDF'IFE LEVEL PRO[mUCT IN : PRODUCT,'; : ,, ........... (LOW ............................................. : IN INCHES GRADUATE ~REPLACED ~: :COMF'UTATION: :TEMPERATURE LEVEL> [mATE. :RECORD DETAILS OF SETTING ' ~' OF ADJUSTED UP AND RUNNING ~EST :BEGINNING: LEVEL :: THERMAL EXPANSION ........... ......... (USE FULL LENGTH READING : OF ~TO WHICH BEFORE AFTER PRODUCT ~: SENSOR NET OR VOLUME - TIME OF LINE IF NEEDED) NUMBER ~ READIN~ ~RESTORED READING READING ~RECOVE~ED~ READING CHANGE :CONTRACTION EXP/CONTR 19:~0 :FIRST LOW LEVEL I 1~.0 0.100 :~ 1~,93~ ~ ~SENSOR READING ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 19:~5 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST I : 1~.~ 1~.0 0.100 0.185 0.085 ~ 19,010 7~ 0.058 0.0~7 ~ ~0:00 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ ~ 1~.~ 1~.0 0.185 0.~50 0.065 ~ 19,080 70 0.056 0.)09 ~ ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ '~ ~: ~ ~CONTINUED IOW LEVEL TEST ~ '~ ;~ ~ ' ~ READINGS FORWARD : ~ : 19,080 : ~0:05 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST I ~ 1~.5 1~.0 0.~50 0.275 0.025 ~ 19,102 22 0.018 0.007 0.007 , ~ ' 20:10 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 2 Il le.5 le.O 0.~75 0.300 0.025 : 19,124 22 0.018 0.007 O.Olq ~ ~0:15 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 3 :[ la.~ I~.0 0.300 o.a20 ~'~.:e: : 19,14~, 22 0.018 0.002 0.016 I 20:20 ICONTINUED-LOW LEVEL TEST q I~ l~.q 1~.0 0.~0 O.~qO 0.020 ~ 19 166 ~0 0.016 0.00~ 0.0~0 : 20:25 {CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 5 ~ IM.a 12.0 0.~0 0.~55 0.015 i 19,1~6 EO 0.016 (0.001) 0.019 { ~0:~0. ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 6 Il 1~.~ 1~.0 0.~55 0.~70 0.:15 i 19,2'6 20 0.016 (0.001) 0.018 i 20:~5 ICONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 7 Il 1M.8 1~.0 0.~70 0.385 0.015 19,~24 : 18 0.014 0.001 0.019 i ~0:40 ICONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 8 :: le.~ la.O O.aS5 0.400 0.015 19,242 : 18 0.014 0.001 ~'.0~0 L1QUID CONSTRUCTION INC TANK YEST READINGS (3) South 550 Waste Oil Tank {CUSTOMER Unocal STATION NUMBER~ 1367 STATION ADDRESS 1501 Brundage lane CITY/STATE Bakersfield, Ca. TEST [!ATE 7 / _3__._.~ _89 HYDROSTATIC ~ ~ VOLUME MEASUREMENIS (V) TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION : ;NET VOLUME ~ :ACCUMULATED SENSOR CALIBRATION 79 / 80 PRESSURE CONTROL ~ RECORB TO .001 GAL USE FACTOR (A) ]:CHANGE EACH:: CHANGE LO~ OF TEST PROCEDURES STANDPIPE LEVEL ~ ~'RODUCT IN ' FRODUCT : - ,, ............................................. IN INCHES :~ GRABUATE ~REPLACED ~COMPUTATION::TEMF'ERATURE:: LEVEL) DATE ;RECORD DETAILS OF SETTING '~ .......... OF ~: ADJUSTED UP AND RUNNING TEST ~BEGINNING' LEVEL '' THERMAL EXPANSION ', ........... ......... (USE FULL LENGTH READING OF ~TO WHICH ~: BEFORE AFTER PRODUCT SENSOR NE% OR : VOLUME - TIME OF LINE IF NEEDED) NUMDER READING RESTORED :~ READING READING ;RECOVERED: READING CHANGE :CONTRACTION', EXP/CONTR 20:~5 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 9 1~.~ i~.0 ~: 0.400 0.415 0.015 19,260 18 0.014 ~: 0.001 ~':50 )CONTINUED LOW LEVEL. TEST lO 1~.~ 1E.0 ~l O.q15 O.q30 0.015 19,278 18 0.,'14,',' ('..001 I) 0.022 ~0:55 )CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 11 -: le.a 1~.0 Il 0.~30 o.~qo ).~-~10 19,~96 18 0.014 :: (0.004):': 0.018 ~1~05 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST i~ : 1~.~ 1~.0 ~ 0.450~ 0.~60 0.010 19,S30 16 0.01~ ~; (0.00~)~ 0.011 ~1:15 :CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TE~ 15 1~.~ 1~.0 ~: 0.~70 0.~80 0.010 19,36~ 16 0.01~ :~ (0.00B)~ ).0o5 ,~ ...................................... ~ ........... ,~ ........... Zl:~O ~CONTINUED ~OW LEVEL TEST 16 :~ 1~.~ 1~.0 ~ 0.100 0,110 0~010 19,~78 16 0.01S :~ (0.00~)~ (.0o2 ~1:~5 ;CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 17 ~ 1~.e 12.0 ~: 0.110 0.1~0 0.010 19,39q 16 0.013 :) (0.003) (0.001) ~1:~0 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 18 :: l~.e 1~.0 :: O.leo 0.1~0 0.010 19,410 16 0.01~ ~ (0.00~) (0.004) ~1:35 )CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST 19 ~,' 1~ .~ 1~ .0 ,,' ' 0.1~0 O. lq0 0.010 19 ,~26 16 0 .(')1~. ,' (0.003) (0.007) MI:~O · ~CONT1NUED LOW rEVEL TEST ~0 ~: le.~ 1~.0 0.1~0 0~150 0.010 19,~4~ 16 0.013 (0.00~ (0.010) ~1:45 ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~1 ~ 1~.~ 1~.0 0.150 0.160 0.010 19,~58 16 0.01S (O.OOS) (0.01~) 21:50 :CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ ~: 1~.2 12.0 0.160 0.170 0.010 19,~7~ 16 0.01~ (0.002) (0.016) ......... ~ .................................. ~ ......... . ............................................................................ , ........... ~1:55 :CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ ~ 1~.~ i~.0 0.1~0 O.1BO 0.010 19,~90 16 0.01~ (0.00~) <0.019) ~:00 ~CONTINUED'LOW LEVEL TEST ~4 :: le.e 1~.0 0.180 0.190 0.010 19,506 16 0.01~ (0.003) (0.0~2) ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~5 '' ~ : (0.0~) ~CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~6 ~ ICONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~7 ~' :CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ ~8 ': ': ('~.022) ..... ~__~ ......................... : ......... - ................... : ........... ,___ :TESTED BY Q. Yarbrou~h DATE 7 / 3 / 89 ~ANK OWNER/OPERA~OR Unocal Corporation DATE 7 / 18 / 89 ACCUMULATED CHANGE DIVIDED BY 2 ~ (0.011) Unocal #LJ67 1501 Brundage Lane Bakersfield, Ca. Unocal /~1367 1501 Bru~ndage Lane Bakersfield, Ca. --. - _:_ ~ ~ ~., _~ ~. ~ , ~ , CUSTOMER: UNOCAL DATE: 5-10-89 I.D. '.367 ADDRESS: 1501 BRUNDAGELANE BAKERSFIELD, CA FINAL TEST RESULTS SUMMARY . '~- LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS SYSTEM . TANK SIZE . WATER LEVEL ALR RECOMMEN- NO. PRODUCT GALLONS DIA/MATL INCHES INCHES GPH CONCLUSION DATIONS 1 SU U/L 10,000 95/ST 0 150 +.017 PASS 2 U/L 10,000 95/ST 0 152 +.004 PASS NOTE: REPLACED U/L LEAK DETECTOR. PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS SYSTEM'' TYPE OF PUMP POUNDS POUNDS MINUTES PRODUCT PRODUCT CONCLUSION NO. PRODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED HELD HELD LOSS CC's LOSS GPH /RESULT 1 SU U/L RJ 50 50 10 PASS 2 U/L 1t3 - 50 50 10 PASS LEAK DETECTOR TEST NO. PRODUCT FULL OPEN POSITION CLOSED FOR ~ RESULTS FOR 30 SECONDS 30 SECONDS NONE DETAIL OF TEST RESULTS 'TEST TIME TEMPERATURE ABSOLUTE CHECK SYSTEM TEST LEVEL CLOCK DURATION LEAK RATE COMPENSATION LEAK RATE TEST NO. PRODUCT NO. (IN.) START (HR-MIN) CC/DIV CC/MIN DELTA °F CC/MIN CC/MIN GPH Y/N 1 SU U/L 1 150 4:10 30M 2.272 +9.569 +.020 +8.465 +1.104 +.017 N 2 U/L 1 152 4:50 30M 2.127 +5.279 +.012 +5.018 +.261 +.004. N *LEVEL - Inches from Tank Bottom to Test Level AIR - Absolute Leak Rate (Measured Leak Rate Temperature Compensation) in Gallons Per Hour. CONCLUSION - NFPA 329 criterion of +/- 0.05 GPA is used to certify tightness. This is to certify that the above tank systems were tested, using the HUNTER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. LEAK LOKATOR according to all standard operating procedures. Those indicated as tight at full system meet the criterion established by the National .Fire Protection Assn. Pamphlet 329 for Precision Testing. Date Test Conducted: 05-10-89 Team Manager: ED GULLY Associate: RICHARD RAY Test Certification By: Pat Wheeler, Operations Manager Hunter Environmental 597 Center Avenue Suite 350 Martinez, CA 94553 (1-800) 321-3637 A:UNO1367.R89 Equipment to be installed: Tank(s) , F a . uction ~Pressurized ~]6ravity, Piping ~ Proof o~' C,~ni.r'ac[or's LiGen:;c License / PPi)of of Contractor ' s ~orker ' s Compensation Ilisuralice ,. ~Flbevglass (FRP) ~ake $ ~odel ~Fiberglass-clad steel ~ake. t ~odel ~Uncoated steel ~ake a ~odel ~Other: ~ake a ~odel Comment: Ad(litional: Inspect i on: Secondary Contaillment of Tank(s) E]I)onble-walled tank(s) Make & Mo'del []Syathetic liner ~take a Model ~Lined concrete vault(s) Sealer used ~Othet' Type Make & Model Addi t i ona 1: Inspect i 011: Secondavl Containmen~ Volu,~e. a~ Leas~ 100~ o~ Pvi,~ar~ Tank Volume ( s ) Additional: Inspection: __ /k~';~ _} Secondary Contain'ment Volume for More Than One Tank Contains 150~o of Volume or' Largest Primary (;ontain.~ent ov 10~ of Aggregate Primary Volume, Whicheve~ is Greater Comment: Additional Inspect i oil: I .Rcq' d ' ~ A__pj2 r ore d ~/~ Sec'ondary Containment Open to Rainfall Must, AccommOdate 24 · Hour Rainfall Total Volume Comment: Addi t ional: I ns pec ki on: Annular Space Liquid is Compatible with Product Product Annular liquid Comment: AdditioDal: Inspection: ~/(/~7 . Primary Containraent of Pipin~ ~ - bergl'ass piping Size & Make ~/ ~Uncoated steel piping S~ze . Add i t i o.a 1: ~.)f/' ~ ~X~'~]--~- ~2, ' ~Z~~. Inspection: ,'- Secondary Containment of. Pipin8 Ii]Double-walled pipe Size & ~ake [-]Synthetic liner in trench Size & ~ake ~Othec Req ~ d Approved . Additional: Inspection: Tank(s) Located no Closer than 10 Feet to Building(s) Con, ment: AddltJonal: Inspect ion: Comp]e'te Monitoring System Monitoring device within secondary containment: ~]Liquld level indicator(s) [-~Liqu id used [-]Thermal conductivity sensor(s) [-]Pressure sensor(s) ~]Vacuum gauge Gas or vapor detector(s) Mauqal inspection & samplinM o~mViSual inspection Additional: Inspection: Other Monitoring ~PerJodic tightness testing Method ~Pressure-reducing line leak detector(s) ~Other Colnme~ t: Additional: jr,) -_ ......... Overfii.] P~.otection []Tape l:'].at: gauge(s) '" ~Float: vent valve(s) ~Cal}ac.i'tance sensor(s) ~l{[gh .level alarm(s) ~Aul:.mlii:ic shut-off conl. r.l (s)~ ~Fill ifox(es) with ~1 ft. :l volume ~Opeva'tor controls with v.ist~a] level monitoring Other Comment: .Req '~d Approved -- · , Additional: Inspection: -- Monito~'inM Requi~'ements Additional Comments Inspection: Extra Inspections/Reinspections/Consul tat ions Date: Purpose: Comment: Time Utilized Date: Comment: Time Utilized Date: Pllrpose: Comment: Time Utilized Date: Purpos.e: Comment: Time Utilized Invoice Date: Total Time: Inspector Date: ~ ENVIRONME AL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~ 2?00 "M" S.TREET, SUITE 300, 8AKERSFIELO, CA.g3301 · - (805)861-3636 - UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE FACILITY ~ INSPECTION REPORT * PERMIT= ~ TIME IN 1,.~'2~-~ ..... TIME OUT~; i-~ NUMSER OF TANKS: 3 PERMIT POST,-C1'7---. YES NO INSPECTION DATE ./.,,9/ TYPE OF INSPECTION: .... ~'~NE ..... ~___ REINSPECTION COMP M ' BAKERSFIELD, CA OWNERS NA E,:UNOCAL OPERATORS N~ME:NOLAN H. BERST COMMENTS: .... ITEM ...VIOLATIONS/OBSERVATIONS a, Intercepting an directing ~stem ~ Standard Inventory Contro~ d. In-tank Level Sensing Osvic~ e. Gnoundwater MonitoPing f. Vadose Zone Monitoring ~ 2. SECONOARY CONTAINMENT MONITORING: b. Double-Nailed ~ank c. Vaul: Pressurized Suction c. Gravity ~. OVERFILL PROTECTION: i ~o OU/E~,'// 6. NEW CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICATIONS I. CLOSURE/ABANDONMeNT ~ 8. UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE ~ ~/~ g.MAINTENANCE, GENERAL SAFETY, AND OPERATING CONDITION OF FACILITY C 0 M M E N T S / R E C 0 M M E N D A T I 0 N S ......... ~.~j ........... ~ ............ ~ CQ..~ ........... _~.~ ~J.~]~. ....... ~.~.~S ..................... ' ......~,~AL~.,~ ............. ~..~ ............. J.~F..s ......................................................................................................................................................................................... '~'~'~'~'FD'6-f'i'6'R'"'~'~'~'D'6'~'E'D'6'~ ....... ~]J'~ ......... ~'"'"~'J'""~'F?~-6'~"F~'~T~"'"~'D'1'iq'~-~'~'J'fT~-~-~X'f~'~ ............ ~' .... ~]'"' INSDECTOR:~-/~ ~.~,~"~ REPORT RECEIVED BY:' ~ ................ ~ .............................. :r ............................................................ ~ ............................................... ' ,, ' KER~;OUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTRl~DISTRICT-- 2700 "M" Street, Suite 275 ..' Bakersfield,,~. j9~01 (805)861-3682 PHASE II VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM -' Company Address ! ~'d'31 L'~,~_~z~.,k,,z~/'_,~" / ."J^').f~- City~---/~"~'/,d'_.,~_~j~"-/5 Zip Contact Phone "~ 2 "~ '-'- 4./! ~ ) System Type:~ ,R_J,,~ . ~,1")1) .--HE_ .. GH HA .. nspector I. A Date Z//Z / ff / No,ce Rec' By 2 '4" GASGRADE ~/,I'L.I/IL HL [~q~L J/IL ~'/--- ,~'1~ h/- /,f/ .. ': II "~g '- 1. CERT. NOZZLE · 2. CHECK VALVE '~ " :*":~ ~:" :": ':: N ' O 3. FACE SEAL Z Z 4. RING, 'RIVET L E 5. BELLOWS 6. SWIVEL(S) .. 7. FLOW LIMITER (EW) 1. HOSE CONDITION A 2. LENGTH P O 3, CONFIGURATION R 4. SWIVEL H O 5. OVERHEAD RETRACTOR S E 6. POWER/PILOT ON 7. SIGNS POSTED Key to system types: Key to deficiencies: NC= not certified, B= broken BA=Batance HE =Healey M= missing, TO= torn, F= flat, TN= tangled RJ =Red Jacket · GH=Gulf Hasselmann AD= needs adjustment, L= long, LO= loose, HI =Hid' - HA =Hasstech S= short MA= misaligned, K= kinked, FR= frayed. ** INSPECTION RESULTS ** Key to inspection results: Blank= OK, 7= Repair within seven days, T= Tagged (nozzle tagged out-of-order until repaired) U= Taggable violation but left in.use. COMMENTS: VIOLATIONS: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A "T OR U" CODE IN INSPECTION RESULTS, ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY .......... AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE(S) 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH DAY OF VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805) 861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE VIOLATION. NOTE: CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 41960.2, REQUIRES THAT THE ABOVE LISTED 7-DAY DEFICIENCIES BE CORRECTED WITHIN 7 DAYS. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION 91Z';- ~") t 5 APC..D F!LE " KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT "--- 2700 "M" Street, Suite 275 PHASE I VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM Inspe~or 3~q/~ ,/ a h ~ Notice R~'d By' . · 4. BROKEN OR MISSING FILL CAP 5. BROKEN C~ L~K ON VAPOR CAP 6. R~ C~S NOT PROPERLY S~TED 7. VAPOR CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED 8. GASKET MISSING FROM FI~ CAP 9. ~SKET MISSING FROM VAPOR CAP 10. FI~ ADAPTOR NOT ~GHT 11. VAPOR ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT 12. ~SKET BE~EEN ADAPTOR & FILL TUBE MISSING / IMPROPERLY SEATED 13. DRY BR~K GASKE~ DETERIORATED 14. EXCESSIVE VERTICAL PLAY IN COAXIAL FILL TUBE 15. COAXIAL FI~ TUBE SPRING MECHANISM DEFECTIVE 16. TANK DEPTH M~SUREMENT 17. ~BE ~NG~ M~SUREMENT 18. DI~ERENCE~(SHOULD BE 6" OR LESS) 19. OTHER .. 20. COMMEN~: WARNING: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A CHECK ABOVE ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE(S) 209, 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805) 861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLU- ~.~ ~ ¢~ TION OF THE VIOLATION(S) 1700 Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH OFFICE. Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805)861-3636 ,' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH D)VISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH '' ; ~r" -- ' ' ' .... Vernon....S. Relchard '.::.~ ,.' ~.i'.,.. ,i*" I NTERI M PERMI T PERMI T#270006C TO OPERATE : I S S U E D: JULY 1, 1986 · ~ , E XP T RE S : JULY 1, 1989 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ::~i' .. '~,~L- "-. STORAGE FACILITY *'NUMBER OF TANKS= 3 PACILITY: . .. ..:.'~.~ ,I . ~OWNER: .... ~". ......... ' NOL~N'S uNION SER .... NOTE: ALL INTERI~ REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE*PERmITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT ':,.,:/?'~:h.u':~?.".,~..,. NON--TRANSFERABLE *** POST ON PRE~I S'ES S 'rT AUG 2, ,5 1986 DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED: Permit questionnaire Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the follow~ng before returning this form with payment: For PERMIT · 270006C 1. Send 'all information to Owner at the address listed on invoice (if Owner is different than '-, .' Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information). )~ 2. all information to Owner at the Send' following corrected address: SERVICE S~. 1367 2175 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE 650 WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 ATTENTION: MANAGER MAINTENANCE & CONSTRUCTION 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit for Owner), ...PERMIT" .................................................. ................................. ,ACILITY NA, NUMBER Of TANKS AT THE SITE: ENV. SENSITIVITY ......... EMERGENCY CONTACT_ PE~ON(PRIMARY): NAME: ....... - .......... ] ............................................................................. ].~~ .................................................. _ EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(SECONDARY):\v ~ ~ NAME: PHONE NUMBER: ..................................................................................................................................................................,,.._..~ TANK OWNER INFORMATION: NAME: ADDRESS: ......................................... : ..................................................................................................... PHONE NO.: TANK CONTENTS: TANK ~ MANUFACTURER YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CONTENTS TANK CONSTRUCTION: TANK ~ TYPE(dw, sw, sec.con~.) MATERIAL INT. LINING CORROSION PROT. LEAK DETECTION: TANKS: VISUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS VADOSE ZONE MONITORING WELLS U-TUBES WITH LINERS U-TUBES WITHOUT LINERS VAPOR DETECTOR LIQUID SENSORS ....................... CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS · PRESSURE SENSORS IN ANNULAR SPACE ................ LIQUID RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS IN U-TUBES, MONITORING WELLS,. OR ANNULAR NONE UNKNOWN OTHER PIPING INFORMATION: TANK ~ SYSTEM TYPE I CONSTRUCTION J MATERIAL (SUC'PRES''GRAv')t (SW,DW,LINED TR) 1 LEAK DETECTION: PIPING: ..~_ FLOW RESTRICTING LEAK DETECTORS FOR PRESSURIZED' PIPING MONITORING SUMP WITH RACEWAY SEALED CONCRETE RACEWAY HALFCUT COMPATIBLE PIPE RACEWAY SYNTHETIC LINER RACEWAY NONE UNKNOWN ......... OTHER This is to certify that the above described TE~ED BY: f / le~ aetector.~ ~ere teeted u~ing the Hunter ~K-88 according to all standard operating procedures. Those indicated as PASS meet the criterion Team Manager established by the U.S. EPA '(40 CFR 280). , ENVIt?ONMENTAL 5Et~VICE~, INC. FINAL TEST REPORT san Francisco, CA Phila ia, PA Tampa, FL DATE 5-14-90 415/229-3440 " CONTACT: T. Yap 415/277-2310 Serv. ice Sta /~1357 LOCATION: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION CUSTOMER: UNOCAL R & N DIVISION LL:41 1501 8rundage..LBne . .2000 Crow Canyon P1 SA 8aker'sfield, CA San Ramon, CA TANK SIZE WATER LEAK LOKATOR REsuLTs' SYSTEM# GALLON DIAM. LEVEL GRADE TEST CONCLUSION COMMENTS PRODUCT (IN.) (IN.) (IN,) LEVEL (IN.) GPH PASS/FAIL 5, U/L 10 ,'00( 95 0 .1~2, 160 -.040 x J/L 10:00E 95 0 131 150 -..002 x ADDITIONAL COMMENTS LO 2000 (2) Leak Detectors pass. After brinqinq product 24" above grade a visable 'leak was detected on"'Re"d 'J~c'~'~t"at' plug'Used "~'"'bieed'U/6 system. Note: Photo. . It !0o.ked .like.. someone tried to fix it,_by putting silicone over the top of the hole and when the pressure from the product was too great - it blew out. See silicone attached to photo. Tester was able to plug off temporarily for test. Nike Ehemco did not replace plug and promised 'GRAOE- INCHES FROM BOTTOM OF TANK ~ come back the next day. TEST LEVEL - INCHES FROM BOTTOM OF TAN[<u GPH - ABSOLUTE LEAK RATE (MEASURED LEAK RATE - TEMPERATURE COMPENSATIQN) IN GALLONS PER HOUR CONCLUSION IS BASED ON NFPA 329 STANDARD OF -+0.05 GPH ADDITIONAL SERVICES PRODUCT LINES -- HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS SYSTEM TYPE OF PUMP ff MINUTES PRODUCT PRODUCT CONCLUSION COMMENTS APPLIED APPLIED LOSS CC'S LOSS GPH Remote F1 Suction PASS FAIL U / L R J Submersible ~ x [] _50 15 ....... -, ..... x ~ m Remote [] Suction PASS FAIL / L R ,0 Submersibl~(~i' O ~ 0 1 ~ ............. X ~ [] Remote E] Suction PASS FAIL Submersible 0 0 E] r~ Remote 0 Suction PASS FAIL Submersible O [] Q [] QTY PART # DESCRIPTION PRICE EA., C PART/¢ DESCRIPTION PRICEEA. TECHNICAL REVIEW Page e3- $ SITE PREPARATION ~ND SYSTEM DATA CHECK TANK SYSTEM SIZE 1 . TANK ~'-"~'~2 - TANK ~ 3- TANK ~ CUSTOMER; ~'"~'~,~ ~ o^~rE: ~ / '/- ¢ d~ LOCATION NO.: /~ ~'~ SYSTEM NO.: SITE PREPARATION J OTHER CONDITIONS VANO. ~ECOV~RV [] .LUGS [::~S~RS. [] OTHER VENT ~ NO P~P~RATION ~N TO ~TMOSPHERE ~ P-V VALUE REMOVED ~ OTHER ~ REMOVED & OPEN ~ REMOVED ~ P~UG.IN TEST 1 DATA TANK 1 TANK 2 TANK 3 LOCATION DROP TUBE LOCATION OROP TUBE LOCATION,(./ ~DROP TUBE CALIBRATION LEVELS L~CAT'ON //~' ~-- IMETHOD [2]"-'-- SO LI O R OD D LIQUID Time Tank I Tank 2 ~ I 2 * 3 4 5 6 ~. c~'s~o,v. /~ ;~ ~ LR z ~MINUTE DIVISION MINUT~ (*) ( -- ) TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION (TC) CAlCUlATION COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION ]/ 'F ~ ~ ~ 3785GT CE ~'F CC IN OUT ~ A ~ 0 ~ CH~;T /~ ABSOLUTE LEAK RATE IALR) CALCULATION ~1~ SITE PREPARATION AND SYSTEM DATA~ 1~..3.S CHECK TANK SYSTI~IZE 1 - TANK ~ :2- TANK ~ 3- TANK ~ SITE PREPARATION OTHER CONDITIONS VAaOR RECOVERY [] P~.U~S [~mSERS VENT ~ NO PREPARATION ~N TO ATMOS~ERE ~ P-V VALUE REMOVED ~ OTHER ~MOTE/SUBMEflSIBLE (DEPTH ~ REMOVED & OPEN ~ REMOVED ~ PLUG-IN ~ACE ~P~C · ~ PLUG*OUT LAC~ CLOSED ~ EXTRACTABLE' ~INP ~ COU~ING ~ CLOSED ~ REMOVED &COV(R ~N ~ REMOVED ~ REMCO/& COVER ~ O~N ~ REMOVED & COVE:R~ OTHER TEST 1 DA'i'A TANK 1 TANK 2 TANK 3 LOCATION DROP TUBE LOCATION DROP TUBE DROP TUBE T. PADRE f ..-'" ~ ~ '"" CALIBRATION LOCATION ' E~ SOLID RoD 0 LIQUID ,EVERS ,,, ~,/_& IMET"°° Time Tank l: Tank 2 Ta/)M/~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 AVERAGE START' ~'(4~ /'~4 / CC'S AVG. CC'S/OIV* Z 1~ FO ~.. ~ /g, ~?l COEFFICIENT OF E~PRNSION [/'F ' ~ 378SGT CE ~'F CC IN OUT SOURCE ~ TtSgC ~ TIME MINUTE 1') t -- ) ABSOLUTE LEAK RATE (ALR) CALCU~TION HUNTER ENVIROI~4ENTAL SERVICES, INC. FINAL TEST RESULTS 18350 MT. L~NGLEY STREET, SUITE IOI TEST DATE= 7-24~87 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 800-247-9014 800.-247-2186 ~ ~ ~'?'000 b ~ CUSTOMER: UNOCAL LOCATION/IDENTIF ICATION NO. t 1267 ADDRESS: 1501 Brundage Lane Bekersf laid, CA TEST RESULTS SUMMARY LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS SYSTEM TANK SIZE WATER LEVEL ALR NO. PRODUCT GALLONS DIA/MATL INCHES INCHES GPH CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Super 9980 95"/ST 0 150" +.005 Tight 2 U/L 9980 95"/ST 0 152" +.008 Tight ~ Waste Oil 550 48"/ST 0 83" +.009 Tight OTHER INFO: Visible leak on Dispenser 14. We were able to make the necessary repairs. PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS SYSTEM TYPE OF PLI~P POUNDS POUNDS MINUTES PRODUCT PRODUCT CONCLUSION NO. PRODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED HELD HELD LOSS CC~s LOSS GPH /RESULT I Super Red Jacket §0 I0 Pass 2 U/L Red Jacket 50 I0 Pass NOTE: On suction systems, NEVER put more then 15 psi on any pump syste~. DETAIL OF TEST RESULTS TEST TIME LEAK RATE TEMPERATURE ABSOLUTE CHECK SYSTEM TEST LEVEL CLOCK OURRTION COMPENSATION LEAK RATE TEST NO, PRODUCT NO. (IN.) STATE (HR-H IN) CC/DIV CC/MIN DELTA OF CC/MIN CC/MIN GPH Y/N 1 .Super ! 150" 10:15 37 Mia 1,136 +3g.618 +.093 +39.287 +.331 +.005 N 2 U/L 1 152" 12=00 34 MIn 1.442 +18.056 +.042 +17.551 +,525 +.008 N 3 Waste 011 I 85" 9=30 39 Mia l.O00 + 1.900 +.105 + 1.275 +.625 +.009 N "LEVEL ? Inches from Tank Bottom to Test Level ALR - Absolute Leak Rate (Measured Leek Rate - Temperature Compensation) In Gallons Per Hour CONCLUSION - NFPA ~29 criterion of +/- 0.05 GPA Is used to certify tightness CERTIFICATION This Is to certify that 1'ha above tank systems were tested, using the HUNTER ENVIROI~4ENTAL SERVICES, INC. LEAK LOKATOR according to att standard operating procedures. Those Indicated es tight at full system meet the criterion established by the National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 529 for Precision Testing. Tests Conducted and Certified By: Test Van No. 18 Team Manager= Ed Gully Tank Testing Specialist= Chris Durack leak Iokaton ,~ OEWALTAVENtlE, N.W. ':~ TEST ~ SUITE 4~ .':~ ~NTON, ~ ~702 ' ~:' CONTRACT NUMBER ........ 21~5~1a~ ~52~370= RESULTS . :' :~'" '':~'' ' ..... . '.:~ :~ .' :.,,.; ,.~ ~.g.~.:c~:: · TEST RESULTS ~UMMARY .. ~Y~TEM ' , TANK ~ZE WATER LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS' '. '," PRODUCT GALLONS INCHES LEVEL CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS ,' .., : ::,'~'.I ~' .~'.: ',~"' ::;.$ '~:~ ~,. ':r,'. '-: :". , .. PRODUCT LINES- HYDR~TATIC PRE~URE RESULTS ':",' ~:;.'~.;:,:"-: ;;: TEST . .:.: . '~"" I' OF PUMP PRODUCT PROOUCT~{~{-:, · MINUTES LOSS LO~ ..___ . ...... __ . ...... .... ...... .... '. ~: ~,"~::~.';'..: ~::", .:'L'. ~,.'. ~i~,~ ~.-' :;: :.... ., ~ :",??:;~':? ?. :,~ , OTHER CONTRACTORS~OFFICIA~ CUSTOMERREPRESENTATIMES PRESENT ',-.':. ~:t~:': .::.":'~:;'~:.'&,:',~.::.~;. .' . .. DETAIl. OF TEST RESULTS ":.% .,~ TEMPERATURE TEST TIME. LEAK RATE CO~"~N~ATION LEVEL " (INCHES) c~oc~ OU~A~O~ ~/DIV CC/MIN ~ ~ ~ START H~S.-M~N, C~/MI~ : ..... ::.:.... :'..:.:~:;, ' .. "LEVEL - INCH~ F~OM TANK eO~OM TO TE~T B~V~L .;..',...: ALR - AeSOLUT~ L~AK ~AT~ IM~A~UREO L~AK ~ATE - TEMPERATURE cOM~ENSAtlONI IN GALLONS PER HOUR' · .. .:. ~ERTIFICATION ~i~ i~ to ~rti~ that ~ ~b~w de,cried t~nk ~y~tem~ ~r~ t~ted, u~ing ~ HUNTER ~ERVlOE~, INO. LEAK LOKATOR ~ording to ~11 ~nd~rd operating pr~edure~. ~ i~1~ ' TESTS cONDUCTED BY' ' CERTIFIED BY ' s,~.~.~ ~' ' ~ TEST VAN NO, TANK T~TI~Q SP[CI~LIST TANK AND LOCATION DATA,...'r ._ , , "; '~/ "i!: .,Page 2 CUSTOMER: ---- ' "--' "'-'" ". i.'.'.? 4'.~,'..~'.' WEATHER TIME TEMPERATURE COM'M ENT~ BEFORE TEST ''.'. '-.::~,~-;':.L.' ' ,, , ,, ~'~, -,[., ,',, AFTER TEST - " .' SCHEMATIC: _. . · ::' ~'. ~ ~ WATER ;:' .'~:=".':'""'" '"',~' AGE TYPE ~Om ~,~ , j REPLACEMENT PARTS: PART ~ ~ DESCRIPTION QUANTI~ ,' RIC~?,.'. :'..:' ,., :. :~. ~. '..:':.,:~ ,., '.:~.,, ADDITIONAL CHARGES: (pumpovers, overtime, etc. ) ,TA/S ~ ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 900 LARK~:~'UR LANDING CIRCLe, #125, I. ARKEPUR,, CA 94939 - (415] 481-8890 Env. Health Specialist COB~t B~ClB ¢¢71. Kern County Env. Health 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Re: 1986 Precision Tank Test Results: Enclosed are the precision tank test resul..ts for Unocal Service Stations within your Jurisdiction oa~¥1eted in early 1986. Please excuse the delay in forwarding these results. 1987 tank testing for all Unocal stations in California has just been ' ccmpleted and any test results you may not have recieved as of yet are forthccnting. Please contact Mr. Roger Folda of Unocal at (415) 945-7676 should you have any questions regarding the testing program. Very Truly Yours, Zaiga Zvirbulis Project Manager ZZ/hrs enclosures cc: R. Folda- UNOCAL ..... ,, r...::~ leak Iol~aton_ '~;. 'TEST SUITE 4~ CANTON, OH ~702 RESULTS CONTRACT NUMBER 21~453-18~ 8~523~370 ~USTOMER UNO~L .!:'-P 'o o, 550 OTH~ INfOrMaTION PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS SYSTEM TYPE OF PUMP PRoDucT PRODUC~' ..... # MINUTES LOSS LOSS CONCLUSION/ ~O.PRODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED APPLIED CC'S GPH RESULT I SOP go~jocr.¢t- ~1^ .5op~.~ ~o~,,'.~ ~/~ ~/A ..... NOTE: On suction ~ystems, NEVER put more than 15 psi on an~ ~mp system. ,THER CONTRACTORS, OFFICIAl. CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT DETAIL OF TEST RESULT8 T~ST TIME LEAK RATE COMPENSATION LEAK "ATE ~ NO. (INCHES) CLOCK O~RATION C~/Div CC/MIN ~ e F CC/MIN CC/MIN ..I I~0". 1:~3 Zv~,~ z.o~ :-~.6~,1 o~z 7~6 ~1.~ 4.~30 /30P.............. -~ i.~,:t~ .... fi:_._7_?' ~ 3:° s 20~,'~ . ~ ..~ ~_~- ...... ~__~-.~¢~-.-~ .~u ~:-+., ~'5-' '-C,>~ I. '" I .EVEL -- INOHE~ P~OM TANK BOSOM TO TEST LEVEL ~L~ - ABSOLUTE LEAK ~ATE IMEASU~ED LEAK RATE - TEMPErATUrE ~OM~EN~ATION~ IN ~ALLON~ PE~ HOU~ ONOLUSION -- NF~A 3~g O~ITE~ION O~ ~O.05 ~PH I~ U~ED TO OE~TIFY TI~HTNE~ :~RTIFICATION ~is is to certi~ that ~e above described tank system~ were tested, using ~e HUNTER ENVIRONMENTAl SERVICES, INC. LEAK LOKATOR according to all standard operating procures. ~me indi~ at ti~t at system meat ~e criterion established by ~e National Fire Protection ~iation Pamphlet ~9 for P~l~i~ Testing. TANK AND LOCATION DATA .... Page 2 -.' .... ° . WEATHER TIME TEMPERATURE COMMENTS ~o,~,~s,_ ~. /o-~~. ~' ~. ~s~ _ ~1~. SCHEMATIC: ...............- · ~ Fill Gauge Fill Gauge Fill Gauge Fill Gauge Fill . '. Gauge ~ ~ LEVEL 'GALLONS ~ ~ WATER ~ ':~. ~ ~ '." ToP o~ .,s~. GRADE J~/t ~ J~g// ~ "' DROP TUBE ~ ~ ~Z ~t~ ~ Z ~'~ ,-,,: ..... CAPACITY, GALLONS ~/~ ~ /O~ ~O ~ ...... .', DIA~METER, INCHES , ?S/' '?~,~ ~,' TYPE OF COVER ~7 ~>~ ~7 ' AGE OF TANK s~PUON /V~ T..~ o.~.,.~s /- Y/' /- V/' /-' ~/' TYPE [ VENT CONFIGURATION ~ P-V VENT VALVE TYPE ' NO>/~ ~D'~ ~' REPLACEMENT PARTS: PART # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ,_ PRICE ADDITIONAL OHARGES: (~um~overs, overtime, 'Dat~ obtained from ~ ~t~tion Q LL Oh~rts ~ Other , .'.'..:.%b.. .... ~~,.~;~ Env i ronme nra 1 He~-~ Appl i ca t i onO~ e - 170-0 Flower Street, Bakersfi~ CA 93305 ' . - APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND ~,~ HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY .Type of Application (check): , [']Ne-~ Facility ~Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility· [~Transfer of Ownership A. Emergency 24-Hour ·Contact (name, area code, phone): DaysL.~. ~z,~ Facility Name k~u'5 t)bmo~ ~eW.~4%.C.~. . , No. of Tanks Type of Business (check).: ~]~ Ga SOl i ne 'Station ~Other (describe) Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [']Yes ~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for ~gricultural Purposes? [-]Yes [~NO '' Facility Address %%O% ~D~,~c~ (~%o. Nearest Cross St. T R ' SEC . (Rural Locations fl~ly) Operator _~~ ~, ~e~_~T - ' Contact Person ~ bJ. B. Water to Facility Provided by ~r ~ Depth to Groundwater Soil Characteristics' at Facility I~)T Basis for Soil Type ar~ Groundwater ~th Determin~ti'6ns ~2-~'[" ~oW~'U -' C. Contractor k%//~, ' CA Contractor' s Lice~fse No. Addr ess ' Zip Telephone Proposed 'Starting Date Proposed C~pl'etion ,Date Worker's C~pensation Certffi6ation ! Insurer D. If'This ~ermit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications Proposed E. ~ank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ~ Waste, Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Re~ular~ Prem{~ Diesel ~aste 0 [] [] [] . ~. Chemical O~l~osition o~ ~ateria~s Stored (not necessary ~or ~otor vehicle fuels) Tank ! Chemical Stored (non-commercial na~e) ~ ! (if ,kno~) Che~lca! Previousl~ Stored (if different) - G. Transfer of Ownership ~Dste of ~nsfer Pre~ious Owner Previous Facility Name ~I, accept f'611y all 'o61i~ati°ns of Permit No.__ issued to · I understand that the Permitting Authority may: review and. modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergro~d storage facility upon receiving this completed form. iThis form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. ' ' Signature ~ ..... ~?F.~?..' ,;,~.~ _ .d Title V~ Date · T~K ,r{. (FILL OUT SEP~TE FO~ F~'~' .~CH T~K) ~R EA~ SE~ION, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE ~XES H. 1. Tank iS: ~VaUited ~n-Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~!e~all 2. ~ Material ,- ~Car~n Stol ~S~inless.Steel ~l~inyl C~'oridu ~Fi~rglass~l~ Steel Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ O~er (de~ri~) ' 3. Priory Coa~ai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (~llons) ~nufacturer 4. Tank Secondary Contai~ent .' ' - ~le-Wall ~thetic Liner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ~ Other (descr i~ ): Mal ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (~ls.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~R~r ~kyd ~xy ~enolic' ~Glas~ ~Clay ~lin~ ~o~ ~Other (descri~): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~GA'iv~niZ~ ~ass-Cl~ . ~l~yle~ ~ap ~Vtnyl ~a~l~ ~Tar or ~p~lt' ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Ca~ic Protection: . ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~cr[f~al ~ ~t~ '~ri~ Syst~ &. Equi~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception . ' ~ ~ ~is~i (vaui[~ ~nks 0nly) '~Gro~ter ~nttori~' ~ll(s) .~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~ut ~ner ~U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner 'Dlr~ti~ Flow ~ Mcnitort~ ~ll(s)* ~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ ~i~id ~vel ~n~r* ~ Cond~tivit~ ~ Pressure Se~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall ~ank ~Liqutd ~trt~al~& Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitcri~ ~11 or ~ar ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ricdic Tigh~e~ Testis. ~None ~o~ ~her b. -Pipit: ~Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pipit' ' ~nitori~.~p with ~ce~y ~al~ C~crete ~ce~y ~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ceway ~S~t~tic Liner ~y ~N~e ~U~no~ ~her 8. ~en . Tighmess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st Tigh~e~ Test Results of Te~ Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny ~ 9. Tank Re~i r . ~ Ta~ Re if~? :~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) ~ ~ri~ Re. irs 10. ~erfill Protection ~rator '~ilis, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e' ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls citance ~r '~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ Other: · List ~ke & ~el For 11. Pipf~ Thickne~ (inches) Dieter ~ Manufacturer ~essure ~i~n ~Gravity '~p[oxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~,. b. Undergro~ Pipi~ Corrosi~ Prot~ti~ : ~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass<l~ ~ess~ ~rrent ~crificial ~e ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Un~o~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~Wall ~thetfc Liner ~st~ ~ne ~kno~ ~Other (de~ri~): Facility Name ~ou~.~% t~3~. -~---~,,~c.~ Permit No. ~TD~D~... T~K ~[~ ~ (FILL OUT SEP~TE FO~ F~~ ~ T~K) ~5. ~R EA~ SE~ION, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE ~XES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~n-Vault~ ~uble-Wall .~Si~le~ail 2. ~ Material' ~Car~n St~'l ~ Stainless Steel ~ ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~l~ Steel ~Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~~in~ ~Bronze. ~ Other (de~r i~) 3. Priory Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (~llons) ~nufacturer 4. Tank Secondary Contai~ent ~le-Wall ~ ~thetic Liner ~tin~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ~Other (descri~) ~ Manufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inc~s) Ca,city (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior ~. ~~r ~mkyd .~xy ~menolic ~GlaJs ~Clay ~lin~ ~Other (descri~): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~GaI~ani'z~ ~ass-C1~ ~l~yle~ ~ap ~Vinyl ~a~l~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~i~): Ca~ic Protection: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crificial ~e ~t~ ~ri~ syst~ & Equi~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Ta~: ~Vis~l (vault~ tanks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s) '~Vadose Zone ~itori~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wi~ut ~ner ~U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow ~ Mcnitori~ ~:~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Li~id ~vel ~n~r~ ~ C0nd~tivit~ ~r* ~ Pressure ~n~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble'Wall gank .. ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitcri~ ~ll-or ~ar ~iIy Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ricdic Tigh~e~ Testi~ .~None ~.~o~ ~her b. Pipit: ~Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for. Pressu~iz~ ~nitori~ ~p with ~ce~y ~al~ C~crete ~ce~y ~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~t~tic Liner ~y ~N~e ~U~no~ ~her ~te of ~ Tightne~ Test Results of Test' ' Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank ~. ~ Re~ir~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) . ~ri~ Re, irs 10. ~erfill Protection ~rator FiilS, Controls, &.Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ke & ~el For ~e ~'iCes 11. Pipi~ a. ~dergro~d pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~o~ ~terial Thickne~ (i~hes)~ .Dieter Manufacturer ~ ~essure -~ion ~Gravity ~roxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~ b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosion Proration : ~luaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rrent- ~crificial ~e ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ .~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Un~o~ ~None ~ ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~Wall ~thetic Liner ~st~ ~ne ~kno~ ~Other (de~ri~): Faciii[y Name ~,~,~,~ ~Jk~tok~ ~~ Permit T~K ~ (FILL OUT HEP~TE ~CH T~K)~, ~R EA~ SE~ION, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE ~XES H. 1. Tank is: ~ Vaul ted ~n-Vaul t~ ~uble-Wal 1 ~Si~le~al 1 2. ~ ~teri~l ' ~Car~n Steel ~ S~in~ess Steel "~ ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass<l~ 'Steel ~Fi~rglass, Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze :~Other (de~ri~) 3. Priory ~Contai~nt ~,te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (~llons) ~nufacturer 4. Tank Secondary~ Conta.l~ent ~le-Wall . ~thetic Liner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ' ~Other (descri~).: Manufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (Gals.', 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~~r ~kyd'-~xy ~en01ic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~'Other (descri~) ~ - ~ 6. Tank Corrosion P. rotection ~Galvahi'z~ ~ass-Cl~ ~l~yle~ ~ap ~vinyl ~a~i~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Ca~ic Protection: ~ne ,~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~6rfff~"lal ~e ~t~ ~'~ri~ Syst~ & Equi~ent: . 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Ta~: ~Vis~l (vault~ tanks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s) ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~ut ~ner ~U-~. wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow ~ Mc.nitori~ ~ll(s)* ~Va~r ~t~t~r*- ~.Li~id ~vel ~n~r~ ~Cond~t]vit~~ ~ Pressure Se~r in' ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank ~ Liquid ~tri~at & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitcri~ ~11 or ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ricdic Tigh~e~ Testi~ ~None ~ ~o~ ~her ~~,~ ~~q ~ ... ~ .... -b.. Pipit: Fl~eStricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pipit' ~nit~i~ ~p with ~ce~y ~ ~al~ C~crete, ~ce~y ~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~S~t~tic Liner ~y ~ Unkno~ ~ ~her *~ri~ ~ke & ~el: 8. Tank Tightness ' ~is ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ -~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Results of Test Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank ~ ~ Re~ir~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) ~ri~' Re. irs 10. ~erfill Protection '~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~ Auto Shut- Off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ke & ~el For ~e ~ices 11. Pipi~ a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~o~ ~terial~~ Thickne~ (inches) ' Di~eter ~, Manufacturer .~essure ~tion ' ~Gravity '~proXi~te ~ of Pi~ b.~ U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosion Prot~tion : ~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rrent' ~crificial ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical Isolati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Un~o~ ~one. ~her (de~ri~)': c. undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~Wall ~thetic Liner ~st~ ~ne ~kno~' ~Other (de~ri~): Division of Environmenta .alth ,lication Date.~__Z_/~ -~ " ', 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 " (805} 861-3636 .' APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE uNI)ERGROUNI) HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type Of Application {check): ~New Facility ~Modification Of Facility ~Existing Facility ~Transfer Of Ownership A. Emergency .24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days ~ /~~~f~~ Facility Name ~~E ~ No. Of Tanks Type Of Business (check): ~Gasoline Station ~Other (describe) Is Tank(s) Located On An Ag~i~ultural Farm? . ~Yes Is Tank(s) Used Primarily For Agricultural Purpose~? ~Ycs~No Facll.lty Address/~/~~~. ~~~arest Cross St. T ~ R SEC (Rural Locations Only} Owner ~D~L Contact Person ~~ Address /~M~ ~ f~. ~ f~W~ Zip. ~ ~ Telephone ~/~-~- Operator ~~ ~~ ~~ Co, Person X~ B. Water To Facility Provided By ~/~ i)epth to Groundwater Soil Characteristics fit Facility Basis For Soil Type and Groundwater Bepth IJekecmJnations C. Contractor ~z~ ~o~~ff~ /~. CA Contractor's License No. Address /D~ ~0. v ~ ~~.~ - Zip ~~ Telephone ~-~ Proposed Starting Date ~/~ Proposed Completion Date Worker's Conpensation Certification No. ~,C. ~¢/~/~ Insurer ~~' D. If This Permit Is For ~odi fication O~ An Exipting Fac] ]ity, Briefly Describ~ Modifications Proposed /~/~ ~~ ~ff~~~ ~~~/~~ E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehic[e Unleaded R~gular Premium l)ies,:l Fuel {~: I ~/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 '--'Z} 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 F. Chemical Composition Of Materials Stored (not m~cess;try f(,v motor veh}(,1, P,,r.l,:) Tank ~ Chemical Stored {non--commerclal name) CAS ~ {if known) ~!ej~.9.g. CJ]~:,:i0,m~v O. 'rraasfer O__[f 9Wnership Date Of Transfer '~'~'[ Previous Owner Previous Facility Name i, accept fully all obligat.ions of Permit No. issued I ,mderstand that the Permitting Authority may revie,~ modify or terminate 'the transfer of the Permit to Operate this under,;round f'acility upon receiving .this completed form. This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my know[,~,l~.e is true and correct, f~,ff. ~ {.' ~~. t~ ,~~ ~ ~C~L . ~ ~--~~~__~A' ~~l~ , ~. 1. Tank- is: ~ Vaul. l:ed. ~ Nun-Vault:ed ~ [/aul,le-t~all ~ Single-Wall a. Tank Huterial ,. ~ Cn~'lml,',,I. cel L-J Sliainless Sleel g] I'oiyvil~yI Ch.l,~l'i(le ~ Fihet'lTlass-glad Stee i., ~ Otlmt' {desc~'.ihe): 4. Tank Secouthll'~ Ctm ~a.i nmen L i' iz/a ~ I)oub.l.e-Wall ~ Synthetic L, inet' ~' I,.ined Vault ~ None ~ Unknot~n ~ ~/~ [~ Other (describe): ~lanufacturer: - ~latel'in I '['hickness (tnches) Capacity (Gals. 5. Tunk lntet'ior A '~ Rubber ~ AIRyd ~ Epoxy ~ Phen()lJc .[~ Glass ~ Clay ~ Unlined ~ 5iOther (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~ Galvanized ~ Fiberglass-Clad ~ Polyethylene Wrap ~ Vinyl Wrapping J- ~ Tar o~ Asphalt ~ Unknown ~ None ~ Othe~' {describe): Cathodic Protection: ~ None ~ impressed Curt'ent System ~ Sacrificial Anode Syste: 1~ Desct-ibe System & Equipment: q. ~eul( Detection, MonJtol'lng, ami InterceptiOn a. Tank: ~ Visual {vaulted tanks only) ~ Groun(hvater Nonitorinff Nell(s) ~.Vadose Zone HonJtot-inff Well{s) ~ U-Tube Without l, lner ~] tl-'rube wit:h Compatible Liner Btructing Fiot~ To Honltoring Well(s}* ~ Vapor l)etectot' *~ hiquid l,evel Sensnt' * ~ Conductivity Sensor'* ~ Pressure Sensor tn Aunulat- Space Of Double Wall TanR * ~ h.t(luid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube'. Monitoring Well Or Annular' Space. ~ Dally Gauging & inventory Reconciliation ~ Periodic Tightness Testing [~ None ~ Unknown ~ Uther b. Piping: ~ Flow-Restricting bear Detector{s) For Pressurized Piping* ~ ~onitot'ing Sump With Raceway ~ Seuled C(mct'ete Raceway ~ tlalf-Cut Compatible I'ipe Raceway ~ Synthetic blner Raceway ~ None [~J IllSkllown ~] (Il:he[' · llesct'lhe Hake & II;ts 'this Tank Been Tightness 'rested'? ~ Yes ~ No [~ iJnknown Test Name Tes Lint{ Company g. Tank Repair ' ///J Tank lletmit'e(l? [~ Yes L~ Nu [~J :~/~ Uate(s) Of Repair(s) Describe RelmlPs '10. Overfill Protectlon ~ ~)l)erai:or F] Ils, (:oul:v~l~;. & Vis~u~lly M,~tit:o~'s [,eve.[ ~ Tape Float Gauge ~ FtoaL VenL Valves [~] Auto Shut-Ol'f Colit:rols ~ Calmci~ance Sensor ~ Sealed Fil] Box ~] None [~ ~ Uther: l.ist MaRe & Model Fo~ Above Device 11. l~iplug a. Ulld'et-ground P.tpln[[: ~Yes ~ No ~ Unknown Muterial~~~ '['h.icklless (ii,thcs) ~ [~i'amete[' ~/~ Manufactu['er~/~ ~,~ Pressure ~ Sm:Lion ~{ Gravity Al,l)ruxJmate Length Ut' Pipe Ru~ b. Underground Pi.l)ing Corrosion P~'utectiun: ~ Galvanized ~ F.ibet'{:lass-(;la,{ [~ iml,ressed Current ~ Sac~'ificial ~ Polyethylene Wrap ~ E[eci:l't,:al Isolation ~ Villyl WFaD ~ 'rat- or Asphal ~ Unknown ~ None ~ Other (,lesct'ibe): c. Underground Piping, Secomla~'y (JOlltil ill~lell~: ~ Doul)le-WaJ 1 ~ Syntheti,' Liner' System Nt}ne ~ UllRnown ~ Other. (descPibe): ..... ROBERT H, LEE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTUI::IE PLANNING ENGINEERING 14~' LOMITA DRIVE, MILL VAI. LEYi CALIFORNIA 84E41 · [41B] 3E3-1BSO Kern County Health Department Division of Environmental Health Bakersfield, CA 93305 UNION OIL COMPANY APPLICATIONS FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND TANKS VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN KERN COUNTY JOB #1852 Gentlemen, On behalf of Union Oil Company, we are enclosing applications for Permits to Operate underground tanks at the following locations: SS 0588 SS 3609 SS 5488 SS 1367 SS 3655 SS 5573 SS 1564 SS 3691 SS 5587 SS 1612 SS 4669 SS 5716 SS 2989 SS 4888 SS 5895 SS 3507 SS 5014 SS 6106 SS 3596 SS 5334 SS 7048 Some of the applications do not include the 8-1/2" x 11" Plot Plan. These plans will be forwarded to your office as soon as reduction prints can be made for these facilities. Very truly yours, ROBERT H. LEE AND_ASSOCIATES RHL/dm 0 Enclosures cc: Mr. F. H. Pinnell, Union Oil Co.. Mr. Paul Yamamoto, Union. Oil Co.