Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNDERGROUND TANK-C-10/23/92
(805) 836-2345 BUSINESS (805) 836-0744 FAX (805) 831-2372 RESIDENCE(' DOUG MURRAY ~'"'~ COLDWELL BANKER PREFERRED, REALTORS® 201 NEW STINE RD, #100 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 GE~SERUICES .~ 10/02,"92 ¢~9: I 1 P.-O~ RID-E RE'NCR: LEGEND UNOCAL GE~IERAL ARRANCE6(ENT DRAWlNCg 8/g0 · BORING LOCATION Si. ANT 80RING LOCATION AITE~PIT. O' HAND AUGER 60RINGS o ,~ "~'~ ,o. GeoResearch BITE DIAGRAM SCALE IN FEE-f UNOCAL SER~CE S'TATION 36,55 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAXERSF1EM~, CAUFORN1A PROJECT NU6IBF_.R: 92080 OAIT_: ' 3/~ 3/92 J CKO BY: J FIGURE NO.: FILE NO:',9208OA1 ~'~. JORAWH BY: ~ -- SOIL ' ~SP~- p_z~'~-~''~'~STOCKPILE . 5UL - . 3 S 1 HOIST #1 PI1' STOCKPILE /'/-~ ! cb" ~ x x ! --4 7 ,-H1-C-9 I,. / SP-7 FORMER X x / / ~H1-E-11 Hi-~-11 SOIL PUMP ~ / ~ SS29-4 ' k STOCKPI~ ISLANDS / / k H1-N-11 .SOIL XSP-8 "~-Z s~-~ ss:~ ss~s-¢ ~ 'L~/..,o-. FOR.ER i '-x / ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~o ~o~ i X ~ ~ ~ ..'~ ss~-~o , /C~ ~ WAS,~-O~L r~x. PUMP , x~ PL4-9 j k3 H2-C-9~ X ~ ~ ~T3-C-9 - - EXOAYA~ON ISLANDS ~) -- H2 ~ 9~ ~ ~c~, N LT3--C--I' . PL1--64~ ~ FLS-6 H2-E-9~ ~ ~SS13-9 E~CAVATION ~ /X ~ SSl1-14 ...... - g~8-7 '~-~-' ~ - S~9-7 I ~. ~l-~-~ IY~X ~ ~ssT-l~ - s~,-7 i ~ ~x ~ SS5~4~ ~ x~ X ~ *~ ~ 14 ' · ~ ) ~ ~ ~o.ooo ~,~o~ . ~ ..... ~ PR~ER~ , GeoResearch. ~ ~IVERSIDE D~tVE SAMPLE LOCA~ONS ~OR~ UNOCAL SE~CE STA~ON 5655 ' ~' Z6'OO-P'I ERCE-R-O-XD o 10 a0 40 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA i , ~ PROJECT NUMBER: 92080 SCA~ IN F~T ~A~: R~RE NO: 2 FI~ N~ 920808 DRAY~ SEPTIC '~'\. FORI,4ER [ PI. kNTER K 1 ' ' i S, O00 GALLON ' I ~ASOU.E ~'ANKS SB- \ ..'S'1~'-'5 SB-'iC ~X u SEEPAGE J \ ,.~ \ ' PIT J CANOPY ..-" \ \ S8-6 \. I \ BUIL01NG ' i 'k & t ~ \~ LEACH UNE '1 PU~P . "~ i CLARIFIER j o SB-9 n. \ SB-8 HOISTS J ~ CONCRETEPAD \ i sB,.-]2 I -- \ FORMER OASOUNE'/~--~X. j a_ '\ OlSPE]qSER$ _ 10,000 GALLON ' I I i · \, PLANTER I PJVER,SlOE DRIVE RIg:'ERENC~ LEGEND UNOCAL GENERAL ARRANGEI~ENT DRA~NC,, 8/90 · BORING LOCATION -.-e SLANT BORING LOCATION A A! I~I, IPT-c.D HAND AUGER BORINGS GeoReseorch 0 15 30 60 i BITE DIAGRAM SCALE IN FEET UNOCAL SERVICE SIAI'ION 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA PROJECT NUMBER: 92080 DATE: 3/13/92 iCKy: I JFI~RE NO.: 3 FILE NO:. 92080A IDRAWN BY: S. NASH I '"' '~ ((~N~ · · I --~41 -- II ~1 I~ Il ~-' I~~~ ]' -. · , ~ ~ "- , ~ ~ - -" I~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ' ' · .. _ ~ ~ ~ % - ~ . · . . ................ -.:== ........ ~~... ' ; " /~ ~ - * ~'. ~ * = · ~1 II tl II .," -" ." ' : %~1 ~k~ _S~¢ "~ /.4_ :~ .:: ~ ·: .~_ ¢ - .- '~ ~ '~<-'~.Dx' /' : ~ w~(' ~'.~ ./ . C~==~=~=~' ?: ~ -%- . : ..... : :_~ .... ',~ o · ~e~ i ~ ' /, , ._~: ~ L'_ _ ~ " ~ 0 o '_'" . Jj~- ;¢'' '~--'~;~ ' ~ .~ ' ~ ~ ~l · .......... .. . ; . · . / o o o 2:~ ;I.~- '~ "~~~r-:~;;./ ~ ~ ~ ~~i " ~ "~* · '~ ~. H~" . . wa-,~ . ~0':' ' .... · . ....~ · ~ ........ . ~~~ ~ ~, ~~ .o .o- ......... ,:, ~~~~ .~~, ..... ~_ I~~,' , . ~ · · ~ ..... ~{~ ' J ' ~~O]~ ~ Circle · .; L Do~..~ ~. -, · ,. · ~- ' ' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ ' ';:": ~ ~ita · . ' -' -:=- ~' ~-~ ..... ~_~. .' .'.-. S es o " //; J ' ' ~ ~, ~~~c ' " * ~' NOR~ 0 1/2 1 MILE GeoR e rch. REFER~ UNOC~ SER~ STA~ON 3655 U.S.G.S. ~A~ QUADRANG~, 1954, 2600 PI~ ROAD PHOTORE~SED 1968 B~SR~, C~FORNIA PR~ECT NUMBER: 92080 o~ 3/~= ~o B~:/ , I RCURE N~ GEOSER(.~ICES 10/02/92 09~ 10 P.02 NORTH ' - --"' "'q~ GeoReseOrch SCALE SITE LOCATION REFERENCE: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655. U.S.G.S, O~LDALE OUAOEANGLE, 1954, ,, 2600 PIE'RG'E ROAD PHOTOREVISED 1968 8~KFr~tSRE~D, CAUFORNIA PRO~IECT NUMBER: 92080 .... Jla _N,O: TOPO _. , I DRAIh'N By:' $.NA~,,,t ' /~__ _ ~ STO~,PILE { SOIL :.. X STOCKPILE .... ~' PL3 6 ' / ' / '~ CHI-N2-11 / ;TOCKPI~ ~,x, '.~ ~/ ~,,'L . I ..% / ~ ~ ' .,.. ~ ~s~-~o · ~ ~,_~ · r - · ~ . ' - s- I . 'X. L _ x : x sS15-9. _ ' PUMP '.~ pL4-9a ~ H2-C;-9~ v . ~,~ .L;; ~ ... ISLANDS '~" ~"~4 8 ' H2-S=gfl · ~SS 5 ]~ '"-~-'~ X - A } ~oz - . - : - H2-E~e~ X ~5S13-9 , ".2 ~' ~ j ~ n4--w~= ' · ' ' ,:.:'"r'';'" '~ _~ ~ ~* ~ - %~ . , " '.:. N ~l x.~xZX -=~ 10, O0 0 GALLON , ~ ...... ~- ~'- ...... , . ,~ UNE . . . · " . ~: eo eseo :c RIVERSiOE DRIVE · ..~ SAMPLE LOCA~ONS ' '~ LOC~ONS : UNOCAL SER~CE STATION 5855 ' 2600 PI6RCE ROAD NOR~ :,, ' " o ~o 20 4o BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SCALE tN F~T '; FI~ "x,~, ~i ~'/JMI'¢ ,51,,~ .T~ ' .. . ......~ ~ ~'.~,'~ 4qL~'~ ~. ~ :-.. · ....",'.' : . _ .':.'...._ ~ k ~/~ub~ ~w~.' ~/: ,,...~..... ~,: -..-.,., ..:~:.. .... . -...:~ ..: ..... ~ -' ? ~:~...-.. ~ ',j .. ,~. ~. u~, aA~. b~ ...... .~. ~, ~.,---..~ ~'--,z:,~ ..... :- .... .:.~ .', ~.~ _.~. ;7. a~C' c~a~ ,. ~.,... .,_. ~ .~-?":.;:-'.' :.' ... ' , .:, '~- ;':~-? :'.:" ,z.':'~..' :: ..... 7' ~ ::E ,',:, :~',;~.:-'-t'.."~.?." · ~.~....2. t.~,';~v~ kl~:.;...' ~ . ;.-.,'- .. ; ,". :~ .' .... ~ ~ . .-','., ',. '.'~;.,~ '~ ~t,".,';-.~ t~Z ~'~,..: .-;,-': :'.:.~.'., -.~:,~.~. .,. ..,t~/~ '.'2. '- .- ~ .- ' ' ' ' ' '" · ~ ' ' '. I- "~' ~" ~' ' . z.' ' ' ' h.... .......... - ...... , .............. ~,: ~S . , ~ x- ~~k~ ......... -.. ....... - ........... · ...... . ,..~. ..... - ................ · .. 7 . 3 ~' '*'~,?~ . ''.'- ,' ' .'~' · ~ ' ~ " ~ '~'~="' ~X~~ ~- .. · z~ ':~'~' Y~, ' ," , ~ ~' - ' ~" ,~ ';" .... · '~" - ~'-' " ' ~:.L2~.-' ~': '- '", S,,~ , '.-'-,~ ,':, -,~....'~,.' ':-.~'--,," :; ;:::::-,?~ ~' ,,, ~~.~~t.:~?, ~ .... '~;.::~','- '~',,~',?' ~.. ~~'.;I~ (~.;'::':.;'..; ~':.t..'.:_;~.-.:'~, ~',:".z-';~.~:~'~ ~ ..~.~,~'.',:~::.~'":..::~ 'z?~.':,.. ; · . ~,, .' .,.'. -. - .,--,~..-,: ......... v . '= ~ ~ . ~ - .~ ' ' · .'- "-; ' '- '', ,- ~ - - . 2-' "Z~ ~'.~ 2'-' ." '~:;'~ ' ' --" -' ~ ;~ ' '." .~' ..r.., ': ~-,.:?-:-~:, :; ...,.., .?., .7:..; w~ um~.~; .;:':4.-~ .',~'X:..'~':'-. :,-.' :": :..~~.'(:,.? ~T~X~..-7'~-~?.?~,:.-;-.-~:~ ,", "':..~: ~-?':~ '- .:,' , - ' , - , '' " ?7 ~r'~, z:'.'~''[-~ .. ,-~ ,?-;:~'t..:.: ;' '~~::,' ~'";.,:' .":t::~. ~.::::'-' ~ · :'~t ~: :'L.' , ,....: · . '~."t-'~':,?.~-.- - ''{~'~ .-4 ~,~%:"72 t~'.~: +- :~ ::.:~.. ,t;: -:,.,, ,. ,:_ ~ ':;..,.,: - . -.,-" ... ?. ' '. 8~,S~ :.; ,.".:~:'~ : ',~..'f'; :: :': ':,:,'( :t :.:X~' -X:.~'% ',:: -':-~".:: '~" ':E',:~': .,."C',,-'t.'., ~-': :,:'. '~PR~P~ 'LI<., 1~0.3?"., ..~ ,/";:,;'~ ' ".~ ;"::.' ;,{': ........ :..'. ".': ': : ": .... '... :.': ::,... '.~ ::.'-~.'~.. '. ;~ ,~::;: ~~~;~'.L' :.~-:'..-:."'.,'- ~.',:::-~:,_' ":~'-?:'. t ~?,;.':~:: ~ ':~ ~:~' :'...z..',.%~;~':~,:-~p~:~.~::.:c.;~ ?;~.~..?} ::~:i:~:-:::.p:~ ~: - ~:~ :~,. ~.L~ _..:.'.~ ~ ~_~'~*~ ~";:'~..~_~..~'-.. ~--~;.'~,~ · -.:"-' ,~ ~ " . .: ' . -~...T ~. ~.' . :',~.''',~? ~:~4~_ -~? ~?~.: , ' ~ '--' ~ ' ~. ' - ' · ' :' ': :"K~':~: :~';'~ :'~:-'.. ' ~,'~'2: ;. '~ ':t"."~:' ~:~ '- ' ...... '.,,'. '.,'" ::!"::~:i':' TANK AND LOCAT!ON. DATA, Page .' .., ::. ,,, .'::.: ,!, :':' :.: tI ~ ,::.,:, '.,'. " '" ' ' '-- :"..-,. " · , ' ' STATE: .~'~ ....... WEATHER ~t *~ TIME TEMPERATURE COMMENTS ~1 BEFORE ~TEST, L' '" :'~ . /j.. :. - . .:..~ .::,:..' ,~.6. · ~.i.~_.~,. · O >' .GALLONS;." [, ~;" ::.,j {'~ ~.~'"~ ~ ....~" ~F" RISER DIAMETER. INCHES: [ ' "~ ~u~ ~. ~ . ~. ~PE OF OOVER ~ ,.~ANK(OPENING ~ / EXTRACTORS O ('~ [ VENT CONFIGURA'TI~N ~ .... - REPLA~ EMENT.PARTS: ~ART ~ . DESCRIPTION QUANTITY .... PRICE ADDITI ~ALCHARGES: {~um~overs, overtime, etc.}' ~ata obt~i6ed [rom ~Station ~ ~ Ch,rt~ ~ Other t. I.D. ~ ...... AFTER TEST -. '?,"r ~ :' ~ L ~ J~.-} ~ .. . ,,:,? ~. ~ 'r ~ ! ,,-, ~,~ Fill--' Gauge Fill G~uge - Fill Gauge Fill Gauge Fill' Gauge ~ ~ ~VEL , , O ~ GALLONS ..... m ~ WATER TOP OF RISER ~XTRACTORS ' ~r TYPE , - - REPLACEMENT PARTS: PART ~ DESCRiPTiON QUANTITY · PRICE. 'Data obtained from 0 Station ~ LL Charts 0 Other BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION 18 J~lv. 19~ X27 Date Permit No. In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, permission is hereby granted to: Name of Company Address to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or process involving or creating con- ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows: subject to the provisions and/or limitations as provided on the reverse hereof. Violation of pertin- ent ordinances, codes and/or regulations shall void this permit. Fire Marshal T BA SFIELD FIRE DEPA ~,~/~/ 1715 C~ESTERAVE, · BAKERSFIELD, CA · 93301 R.E. HUEY RB. TOBIAS, HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR FIRE MARSHAL (805) 326-3979 (805) 326-3951 July 24, 1995 Doug Murray Caldwell Banker Preferred, Realtors 201 New Stine Road #100 Bakersfield, Ca 93309 RE: Property located at 2600 Pierce Road in Bakersfield Dear Ms. Murray: Pursuant to your inquiry, this office as reviewed the proposed change in site use for construction of a restaurant facility at the above referenced address. Based on the Tank Closure Report for the former Unocal Service Station No. 3655, previously located on the subject property, this office is satisfied that the proposed change in use is acceptable. If you have any questions, regarding this matter, please feel free to call me at 326-3979. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator cc: Howard Wines RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ~ .~-~_c~- ID# Business Name: ~'7~.c:-,'~ Contact Name: ~~ ~ ~Y Business Phone: %~ ~ ~ ~-- F~: Inspe~or's Name: Time of C~I: Date': ~( ~/~ Time: Type of C~I: Incoming ~ Outgoing [] Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: CITY of BAKERSFIELD ' "WE CARE" ~. ,~. ~ ,,~ /j FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. D. JOHNSON October 2 3, . 19 9 2 BAKERSFIELD. 93301 FIRE CHIEF 326-3911 Unocal Refining & Marketing Division Unocal Corporation P. O. Box 5155 ~ San Ramon, CA 94583 Attn: Robert Boust CLOSURE OF 3 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE TANKS LOCATED- AT THE UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655; 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. PERMIT ~BR0047 Dear Mr. Boust, This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results for the preliminary assessment associated with the closure of the tanks located at the above stated address. Based upon laboratory data submitted, this office is satisfied with the assessment performed and requires no further action at this time. This letter does not relieve you of any liability for past, present, or future operations. In addition, any future changes in site use may require further assessment or mitigation. It is the property owners responsibility to notify this department of any changes in site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3979. SLncer~l¥, - . ~., // / j ~,~'----- · Z.~_.~. . /uoe A. Dunwoo~y y Hazardous Material Specialist / Underground Tank Program cc: Blair Redfearn GeoResearch 1713 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 · . . eoResearch Fresno, California 93721 By ' (209) 264-0444 Fax: (209) 264-9800 October 2, 1992 Mr. Joseph A. Dunwoody Hazardous Material Specialist Hazardous Material Division 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, California 93301 'RE: Figures for Unocal report #92080, Unocal Service ~tation #3655', 2600 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. Dear MK. Dunwoody, Enclosed are the figures which were missingin the above referenced report. If you have questions or need additional information don't hesitate contacting me at (209) 264-0444. sincerely, Blair Redfearn ' Senior Staff Geologist ~ GeoResearch is a division of GEOSERMICES, a Cal'ifornia corporation . .. · : _ __" _ GeoResearch -. · .. ~.: .- _ .RECEIVED 1713 ~lare, Suite 113 .... Fresno, California 9~21 SIP '8 1992 (209) 264-0444 (800) 523-~786 . HAZ, MAT; O!V. Fax: (209) 264-9800 '~. ' 'sePtember 2, 1992 Mr..Joe DunWoody HaZardous Materials Specialist ' Bakersfield City .Fire DePartment HazardoUs Materials Division 213 "G" Street · Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Tank Closure report for. Unocal Station-No..3655, 2600 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. GeoResearch Project Number 92080-02. Mr. Dunwoody: On behalf of Unocal,. GeoResearch is submitting the enclosed tank. closure report for th~ above-referenced site. Also on behalf of -Unocal, we. request a closure letter be issued fOr this site. If you_ have any questions, please call me at (209). 264-0444. Sincerely, Warren W. Gross'. Associate Geologist enclosure .-, cc: Mr. Robert Boust, Unocal cOrporation .,. UN03655. T6082692F4 ;..~' " Ge0Re. search is a division of GEOSERVICES,.a. California' ,, STATEOF CA~I.FO. RNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY/SITE · MARK ONLY E~ 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMI+' [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED SiTE ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT 'E~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE I, FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED) DB AL~~OR FACILITY NAME~ .~-~",~:=,-m~/~"~".~.~ NAME OF OPERA T OR ADDRESS NEAREST CROSS STREET PARCEL # (OFTIONAL) CITY NAME STATE I ZIP CODE SITE PHONE # WITH AREA CODE ,/ BOX TO iNDICATE E~ORPORATION [~] INDIVIDUAL E~ PARTNERSHIP E~ LOCAL-AGENCY E~ COUNTY-AGENCY [~] STATE-AGENCY ~ FEDERAL-AGENCY DISTRICTS TYPE OF BUSINESS ~ I GAS STATION E~] 2 DISTRIBUTOR E~ ,/ IF INDIAN I# OF TANKS AT SITE I E. P.A. I.D.# {optiona/) ' .ESERVATIONI ~ 3 FARM ~ 4 PROCESSOR r-~ 5 OTHER ORTRUST LANDS EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY)- optional ~ DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE I DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) ~ NIGHTS; NAME(LAST. FIRS~ PHONE ~ WlTH AREA CODE I ~IG~TS: NAM~(LAST. FIRS~ I ~~Y PHONE, WITH AREA CODE ,. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION - {MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~ iNDIVIDUAL ~ L~AL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY ,I. TANK OWNER INFORMATION-(MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME OF OWNER CARE OF ADDRESS iNFORMATION MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~~~ ~ ~x ~i~icate ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY CI~ NAME ' . STATE ZIP CODE PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise. TY(TK).Q I ~ 5 LEWER OF CREDiT ~.6 ~EMPTtON ~ ~ OTHER VI. LEGAL N~IFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notificatio~ and billing will be sent to the tsnk owner unless box I or II is choked. CHECK ONE BOX INDICATING WHICH ABOVE ADDRESS SHOULD BE FOR LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS AND BILLING: I. ~ II. III. USE~ THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDE~ P~AL TY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST ~ MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT I ~PPLICANT'S NAME (PRINTED & SIGNATURE) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I APPLICANTS TITLE . · I DATE MONTH/DAY, EAR LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY / ~ COUNTY ~ JURISDICTION ~ FAClLI~ LOCATION CODE . OPTIONAL CENSUS TRACT · - OPTIONAL SUPVISOR - DISTRICT CODE - OPTIONAL T~S FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY.AT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FOR~ B~ UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF S~E INFORMATION ONLY. FORM A (5-91) FOR~3A-5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' ~ STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM' B COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARKONLY. -~---I 1 NEW PERMIT [~ 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [~ 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ONSITE ONE ITEM ' [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [~ .8 TANK REMOVED I. TANK DESCRIPTION .COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN C. DATE INSTALLED (MOIDAY/YEAR) I 9-'/ ~ D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: II. TANK CONTENTS IFA-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C. UNLEADED [] 6 AWAT,ON~AS [~ 2 PETROLEUM ~] 80 EMPTY [~ 1 PRODUCT J~] lb PREMIUM · [] 4 GASAHOL [~] 7 METHANOL UNLEADED [] 5 'JET FUEL [~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT ~ 95 UNKNOWN E~ 2 WASTE ~-~ 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE· IN ITEM D. BELOW D. IF (A.1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S.#: II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B,/~NDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL -- [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B. TANK [] 1 'BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [~ 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [],5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMI~IUM [] 8 10000/. METHANOL'COMPATtBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) []. 9 BRONZE. [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 ·UNKNOWN [] 99' OTHER · · C. INTERIOR [] ~1 RUBBER LINED []' 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING ' 'LINING [] ~ GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER · IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100°/o METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] I POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLAsTic PROTECTION [~ 5 CATHoDIC PRoTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTA.~INMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U.IFU~DERGROUND, BOTHIFAPPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A~/?2 PRESSURE A IJ 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHEh B. CONSTRUC'I'ION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL ALI 3 LINED TRENCH A(~;~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A-U '2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100"/o METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~795 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER O, LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONrrOR~NG [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [~ 1 VISUAL CHECK [~ 2 !NVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONiTORiNG [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 ,NTERSTmALMONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION WAS TANK FILLED WITH \ 1. ESTIMATED DATE. t'~LAS'J' /j~'''~ 'L~ED (MO/DAY/YR) 2.. SUBSTANCE REMAININGESTIMATED QUANTITY OF ~'~ J~ GALLONS 3. INERT MATERIAL ? ~,[~'r ~-~ []. NO [] THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND,~I~HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT J APPLICANT'S NAME '~"~""~"~ ~'~--"~--,,~=~1.-,4 .... '~ -'~/ ~ - J DATE [ LOCAL AG ENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF TH~FO~MBERS BELOW COUNTY # . JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK # STATEI.D.# ~Iolzl/ I 1o1 1 1 1 III PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE FORM B (7-91) THIS FORM Must BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. FOROO34B.R5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM B ~ ~ '~,~)~/ COMPLETE A SEPARATE'FORM FOR EACHTANK SYSTEM. ' MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT . [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 .PERMANENYLY CLOSED ON SITE ONE ITEM ~ ' 2 INTERIM PERMIT [~ 4 ·AMENDED PERMIT [~ 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~ 8 TANK REMOVED I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN ' ·.' A. OWNER'S TANK ,.D.# B. MANUFACTORE BY: c. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY,YEAR) [ O'~--J e:~ '.. O. TANK CAPAC~ iN GALLONS: ~C;~t II, TANK CONTENTS IFA-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM ~i ' '~ A. !~1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [~ 4 OIL B. C..l~' la. REGULAR [] 3 DIESEL [] 6 AVIATION CAS '" ~JNLEADED GAsAHOL [~ 7 METHANOL [] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY r~l PRODUCT, r~-] ibPREMIUM [] 4 · ' - .~ UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL ~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [~] 95 UNKNOWN [~ 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [~] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW D. IF IA.l) IS NOT MARKED. ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA. B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE A. TYPE OF [] 1' DOUBLE WALL []' 3 SINGLE WALtJ WITH EXTERIOR LINER [~ 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL -- [] 4 .SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) []. 99 OTHER B. TANK [] 1 BARE STEE~- : '[] 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 FIBERG~ASS . [] 4 STEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS'REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM '[] 8 100°/o METHANOL'COMPATIBLEw/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL []-95 UNKNOWN [] 99' O~HER : · [] 1 RUBBER LINED I--~_~ ALKYD UNi~G [] ~ EPOX~ UN~NG~ [] ~ PHENOUC 'L,N,NG C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [~ 95 UNKNOWN ' [] 99 OT~ER ' LINING IS LINING MATERIAL cOMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING' [] 3 VINYL WRAP , ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] ,91 NONE ; [] 95 UNKNOWN [] .99 OTHER - E, SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTA.~INMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL 'PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV, PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, , BOTH IF APPLICABLE . ; . A. SYSTEMTYPE A U ~ SUCTION Aimings. PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B, CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH 'A {~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM . A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/COATING 'A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER O. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 iNTERSTITIAL MONrTORING '[~ 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION. [] 6 TANK TE~TING '[] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN, [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION . THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND T~ TH~BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS coMPOSED OFTHE FO~I~NUMBERS BELO~'~'~ - COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # · TANK # STATEI.D.# .~ IOJ' lJ l l l lol. l I 'l-I'- PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE FORM e (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A'CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. FOROO34B-R5 ,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION. FORM B :. COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARKONLY [] 1 NEW P~RMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ONSITEI ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [~ $ TANK REMOVED DBA OR FAClLIT NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED; J I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY tF UNKNOWN . t ~ ' C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) t ~~ D.~TANK CAPACITY iN GALLONS: .Z~ .. II, TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C. A. [] I MOTOR VEH,CLE FUEL [~.4 OIL B. C. [] laREGULAR [] 3 D~ESEL [] 6 AV,AT,ONGAS UNLEADED [] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY [] 1 PRODuct [~ lb PREMIUM [] 4 GASAHOL [] 7 METHANOL UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL r-~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [~ 2 WASTE I-~ 2 'LEADED ~. 99 OTHEI~ (DESCRIBE..I, ITEM D. BELOWI D. IF(A.1) IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED I~,l~:;~I~---.. ~r-~J~"~"-['~ Z::~'"' C.A. Si#:., III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESlNBOXDANDE A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95. UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL -- [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B. TANK [~ 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBE'RGLASSREINFORCEDPLAST~C. . MATERIAL [] 5 cONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL 'COMPATIBLE W/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 .uNKNowN [] 99' OTHER · []* 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 9g OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROS~ON' ~ 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FtBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PRO~ECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTI(~N [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E, SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTA?NMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) , ' IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A~3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH' A~ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A. U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A' U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A IJ 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AuTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING' [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MdNFFORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [~ '6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTI:TIALMONITORING ~ 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION I~.EST'MATEDDATELAST~ED(MO/DAY~R) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF --I ' I 3. WASTANKFILLEDWITH.I THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND T.J~'T,~ BEST OFMY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OFTHE ~R N~RS BELOW COUNTY ~ JURISDICTION ~ FACILI~ ~ TANK ~ PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATfON DATE FORM B (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE .ACCOMPANIED BY A PERM~ APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILER. FORO~-~ HAZARDOUS MATERIAL'- DIVISION ' :~ ~ '2150 G.street', Bake. rs'field, CA:'93301. · - (805) 32'6-=.3979 ' - .~ · '-~".-CERTIFICATION sTATEMENT/OF TANK DECONTAMINATION' :.. ~.~ ~:,...~ ~i~L/~· . · . . . ~ .:,. , , 5~ m' ~'(~ 0 i '&. an .... ,puthorized 'agent"i of ' ' -' .... name ..... ' ,:'.:..,..}:,:.,.."._? '~ Q/~. '"ff~ ~,'":" '.' ~' here' bY'attest under' penaltyz~ Of~ ' .., contracting cO. . .... : ' · ' , perJu~ that the tank(s) 'loCated:at 3dO0- er~e "an~ '-.'- . ' , ' .. , , . _ .,' address ,' being re~o=ed under pemtt% B'R-ooq7 haS been cleaned/decontaminated prop'erly.and a LEL (lOwer explosive limit) reading of no greater than .5% was measured i~ediately following the' 6loanihg/decontamination process .: - ~ date ' name '[print-) ' '~ ,: ' signa~e~. Bakersfield Fire Dept. PERMIT N HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION ( {~'~i , UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION FACILITY NAME ~qc.~ ~-~TCI,T~<::) !'1 ' CROSS.STREET TANK OWNER/OPERATOR tJkJOC..flAL~, PHONE NO. ~tZ,} c~-'/'"j, t,::~c. C1. MAILING ADDRESS I '2.;Z.,~'~:::' ~-~"~L.'v',~-~ '~'T' CITY N. I.I~L~. I.loeO ZIP CODE. gl CONTRACTOR INFORMATION ' COMPANY ~'L-.r~z~C- PHONE NO. (~l~.~'l~?!1 LICENSE No. 4(oZ~-~~-- ADDRESS ~,i~'~t~4~rZJl~tR~ ~¢,'T' CITY .[~Uj~klI::~,L~ZIP CODE ~/o/0 INSURANCE CARRIER WORKMENS COMp. No. PRELIMANARY A$$EMENT INFORMATION · " COMPANY 't¥/Sf:~l~EjL'I/~j ~__Z~. PHONE No.(5113'~ (oO~-~/d~) LICENSE No. ADDRESS ~":~"~/ ~7-.~A//,V'~/-L 'I:21~IVE ~T~-~'~3~ CITY ~:~N'c:~A~Z::) ZIp.CODE' INSURANCE CARRIER' WORKMENS COMP No. TANK CLEANING INFORMATION PHONE No. . COMPANY ~ PEEI~ ADDRESS I.~j'/:5 E;. ~E'T'/'~'/~V't~ /'~1~ CITY ~,~"l~RlflZIPCODE ~ WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~'7 .~P~ ~ ~D NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~~ Ot~ ~ ~F. ~ · J~' ADDRESS.C~~b ~IVE . CI~ ~~ZIP CODE ~ FACILI~INDENTIFICATIONNUMBER-' ~H~ ~l-JI ~ ~ ~'~ ~ c~P ~~1~7 TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANY ~ ~ ~' · PHONE No. ~0~) ~ ~-~LICENSE No. ADDRESS~II ~, ~~ ~b~ CI~ ~ ~q ZiP CODE TANK DESTINATION ~AL~ ~ ~~V~ -1~ ~. ~n ST ~n~ ~Q~q .. . ~5 '... ' TANK INFORMATION. TANK Nb. "' · AGE' VOLUME CHEMICAL 'DATES CHEMICAL STORED STORED. PREVIOUSLY STORED ii~iix~::~:::~:~::i:i:i:i:t!~.'..iii!iiit:t:::~:i:~!!!:!!ii!~':'~::':!: .:::': .::~:!' :!' ======================================================================================================= .:h::::~:::. i~ii~"'~'"-'":i~! ...... !~ ~J($~:::~x:x ::::t :~;::~:J~E~E~z~ .::: ........ :'"':::' ........ ":: ...... ':'': ..... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ...... - ................o ................................ · ............. NO.::OE:::~. ..... ~ .................... ,. APP:D~ON:~. ~E, ............................. _ ............................. : THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE A~ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER ' STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. . , - ' ' · ~ ' .' ,HISFORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNOER PENAL, OF PERJURY AND ,O THE BEST OF MY KNowLEDgE.''STRUE A~ ~RECT.. ~' ~,~-,: ' '. · · k / ' , .' - :~[- THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT ~EN APPROVED ', TANK CLOSURE REPORT for UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 Pierce Road Bakersfield, California prepared for UNOCAL REFINING AND MARKETING DIVISION Unocal Corporation 2000 Crow Canyon Place, #400 San Ramon, California 94583 prepared, by GeoResearch, a Division of GEOSERVICES, a California Corporation, 1713 Tulare Street Fresno, California 93721 (209) 264-0444 August 26, 1992 92080-01 TABLE OF CoNTENTs EXECUTiVE~SUMMARY ..................... i STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION . . ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................... 1 '2.0 BACKGROUND ....................... 1 3.0 SITE GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY ............... 2 .3 4.0 OBSERVATIONS/PROCEDURES ................ 4.1 SERVICE BAY AREA .................. 3 4.2 DISPENSER ISLANDS ................. 4 4.3 GASOLINE/WASTE-OIL USTs .............. 4 4.3.1 UST Removal ................ 4 4.4 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ..... . .......... 5 5 5.0 LABORATORY RESULTS ................... 5.1 GASOLINE TANKS ........... ....... 5 5.2 FUEL DISPENSERS/PRODUCT LINES ........... 6 5.3 SERVICE BAY/WASTE-OIL UST ........ ..... 7 6.0 STOCKPILED SOIL .................... 8 7.0 BACKFILL/COMPACTION AND CONFIRMATION SAMPLING ..... 9 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............... 10 TABLES TABLE 1: RESULTS OF TPH-G AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE GASOLINE UST EXCAVATION, UNOCAL NO. · 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE 2: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED NEAR THE DISPENSER ISLANDS, UNOCAL NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE 3: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE SERVICE BAY/WASTE-OIL UST AREA, UNOCAL NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA UN03655 . TCO82692F4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT') TABLE 4: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLE ~T3-C-9, EPA METHOD 8240, COLLECTED IN THE WASTE-OIL USTAREA, UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE 5: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLE T3-C-13, EPA METHOD 8240,COLLECTED IN THE WASTE-OIL USTAREA, UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE 6: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM SOIL STOCKPILES, UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE 7: LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM IMPORTED BACKFILL MATERIAL IN THE GASOLINE UST PIT, UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655, 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURER FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2: SAMPLE LOCATIONS FIGURE 3: SITE DIAGRAM APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PERMITS/DOCUMENTATION - USTREMOVAL, RINSATEMANIFEST, UST DESTRUCTION DOCUMENT, COMPACTION CERTIFICATE APPENDIX B: GEORESEARCH SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES APPENDIX C: SUMMARIES OF ANALYTICAL METHODS: SOIL SAMPLES APPENDIX D: CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS AND LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS UN03655 . TCO82692F4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GeoResearch observed service station demolition and underground storage tank (UST) removal at Unocal Service Station Number No. 3655, located at 2600 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California, in May of 1992 (Figure 1). Appropriate soil sampling and analysis was completed. The work was completed in accordance with a California Business Plan Remedial Action Plan (CBP RAP) dated May 13, 1992 which was submitted to Unocal and authorized by Mr. Robert Boust on May 13, 1992. The purpose of our activities was to direct the removal of any significant.contamination resulting from the operation of the service station, document the condition of remaining soils with respect to petroleum hydrocarbons and other ~ested analytes, and prepare a written report suitable for demonstrating the suitability of the UST site for closure. Soil with staining and/or petroleum odors were observed in two areas during station demolition; in the gasoline UST excavation and near the fuel dispenser islands. Such soils were excavated, stockpiled on site, and characterized. The hydrocarbon releases appeared to have resulted from overspillage from the gasoline tanks and spillage and/or minor leakage within the dispenser area. Sixty soil samples were collected to evaluate the site. Only low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were found at the site. of those that were found, the soil was ultimately removed and clean confirmation samples obtained. The excavations were backfilled with stockpiled and imported soil which had been demonstrated with laboratory analytical testing ~to be clean. Approximately 21 cubic ~yards of soil containing moderate concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons from the waste-oil tank and automotive hoist excavations will require disposal at a Class II facility. There is no apparent need for further soil remediation atthis UST site. Closure of this site is appropriate. The removal, remediati°n, and Closure of septic facilities at this site have been conducted under the direction ~of Kern County Environmental Health Department (KCEHD). These activities will be covered in a separate report. UN03655 . TCO82692F4 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION Information provided in this report for GeoResearch.Project Number 92080-02 'is intended exclusively for Unocal Refining and Marketing "Division for the evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbon occurrence as it pertains to the subject site at the time the data were collected. The professional services have been performed in accordance with practices generally accepted by professional geologists, hydrologists, engineers, and environmental specialists. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. -As with all subsurface investigations, there is no guarantee that the work conducted will identify any-and all sources or locations of contamination. This report is issued with the understanding that Unocal Refining and Marketing Division is responsible for ensuring that the information contained in this report is brought to the attention of the appropriate regulatory agency. The enclosed report has been reviewed by an engineering geologist certified in the state of California and whose signature and certification number appear below. Blair Redfearn Warren W. Gross, C.E.G. No. 1528 Senior Staff .Geologist Associate Geologist UN03655 . TC082692 F4 1.0 INTRODUCTION · GeoResearch °bserved' service station demolition and underground storage tank (UST)~removal at Unocal Service Station Number 3655, located at 2600 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California, in May of 1992 (Figure 1). Appropriate soil sampling and analysis was completed. The work was completed in accordance with a California Business Plan Remedial Action Plan (CBP RAP) dated May 13, 1992 which was submitted to Unocal and authorized by Mr. Robert Boust on May 13, 1992. The purpose of our activities was to direct the removal of any significant contamination resulting from the operation of the service station, document the condition of remaining soils with respect to petroleum hydrocarbons and other tested analytes, and prepare a written report suitablefor demonstrating the suitability of the UST site for closure. Station demolition was conducted by Fortson Construction Company of -Bakersfield, California under the direction of SolRac Enterprises, Inc. of Irwindale, California. Permits, uniform hazardous waste manifest, and tank disposition documentation provided within~this report were provided by SolRac (Appendix A). Two 10,000-gallon fiberglass gasoline USTs, one 280-gallon steel waste-oil UST, two automotive hoists, and a clarifier were located on-site as well as associated fuel dispensers, product lines, and vapor return lines (Figure 2). Also located on the site were a septic tank, leach line, and a seepage pit. These facilities were removed or destroyed in conjunction with appropriate remedial action in accordance with the requirements of the Kern County Environmental Health Department (KCEHD) and will not be addressed in this report. A separate report will be submitted to the KCEHD regarding this work. 2.0 BACKGROUND GeoResearch reviewed information regarding the site provided by Unocal. This included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment by PHR Environmental Consultants, Inc., dated October 30, 1991. The Phase I included a site diagram dated 1954 showing the previous locations of the USTs and their associated fuel dispensers. 'According to the Phase I assessment, construction of the station was completed on January 8, 1954. At the time of completion, the station facilities consisted of two lube bays, one hoist, two parallel dispenser islands located at the south ends of the recently removed dispenser islands, and two 5,000'gallon USTs located northwest of the former station building. UNO3655.TCO82692F4 1 The station was remodeled in September of 1979, during which the old 5,000-gallon USTs were removed and two 9,540-gallon fiberglass USTs were installed at a different location south of the station building, one additional automotive hoist was added and fiberglass vent, vapor recovery, and product lines replaced the metal lines. Soil contamination or product, odors are not known to have been present at the time of the UST and dispenser replacement. No information regarding the removal of the old product lines is mentioned in the Phase I investigation and no steel lines were found during the demolition activities. A Previous investigation was conducted by GeoResearch at the site in January of 1992 (Environmental Site Assessment, Unocal Service Station 3655, 2600 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California dated June 2, 1992). inwhich seven soil borings were drilled near the USTs and ~dispenser islands (Figure 2). Much concrete and other debris was encountered in shallow soils. Verbal communication with a local contractor indicated that the area in which the station is built was used as a disposal area for building debris following an earthquake in the 50s. Laboratory reports for soil collected in this investigation did not indicate that the USTs and dispensers had released significant quantities of petroleum hydrocarbons into the Underlying soil. An on-site septic disposal system was identified, including a leach field receiving discharge from the service bay clarifier. The City of Bakersfield Public Works Department was contacted to determine whether or not the station was ever connected to the municipal Sewer system. No records of a sewer connection were on file. It was determined that the septic disposal facilities would be removed/destroyed in accordance with KCEHD requirements. 3.0 SITE GEOLOGY/HYDROGEOLOGY Soils beneath the site consist of alluvial material derived from the Sierra Nevada to the east and the Tehachapi mountains to the south. This heterogeneous section of Pleistocene 'and Pliocene alluvium is on the order of 5,000 feet thick in the Bakersfield area and is composed of unconsolidated sand, gravel, silt, clayey sand and clay. Pliocene-Pleistocene continental clastic deposits overlie the Tertiary basement.' The Tertiary basement, composed of granitic and metamorphic rocks, underlies the clastic section at a depth on the order of 15,000 feet below ground surface (Hackel, 1960). According to Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply Report 1990, District 41, depth to ground water beneath the project site is approximately 45 feet. UN03655. ]'C082692F4 I 2 4.0 OBSERVATIONS/PROCEDURES GeoResearch personnel were on site from May llth to the 13th, 1992 to observe site soils as station demolition proceeded. Areas beneath the station facilities in which soil sample collection was required, as well as suspect areas, were marked for 'accurate relocation after station demolition. Soils in suspect areas were -monitored with an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) for a preliminary indication of the presence of hydrocarbons. The westernmost gasoline UST was designated Ti, the easternmost T2, and the waste-oil UST T3. Soil samples collected near the gasoline/waste-oil USTs were designated T#,orientation-depth (example TI-N-14). Soil samples collected near the product lines were designated ~ PL#-depth. Soil samples cOllected near the automotive hoist were designated H#-orientation-depth. Stockpile samples were designated SP-#. All other soils samples were ~designated SS#-depth. Soil samples were collected in accordance with city of Bakersfield, Fire Department requirements and according to standard GeoResearch procedures (Appendix B)~ Mr. Joseph Dunwoody, Hazardous Material · Specialist, Bakersfield city Fire Department, was on site during the soil sampling activities. Additional excavation was performed in areas where laboratory analytical results of initial soil samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons remained in the soil. Subsequently, confirmation samples were collected and analyzed. 4.1 SERVICE BAY AREA Prior to the removal of the station foundation, a clarifier located between the two hoists in the garage area was found to contain approximately 80 'gallons of oily liquid. The liquid Was subsequently pumped into the waste-oil tank by Quality Vacuum Service of Bakersfield, California to be disposed of with other fluids in the UST. When the garage clarifier was removed, the sides and bottom exterior surfaces of its concrete vault and the excavation where it had been removed, were not observed to have evidence ofhydrocarbon releases. The automotive hoists were found to extend to 8 feet below ground surface (bgs). In excavating soil near the hoists, bricks and fill material were observed from the surface to approximately 5 feet bgs. Similar debris was also observed in the other excavations on the property. A layer of dark soil apparently high in organic carbon (oxidized vegetation) was observed at the base of the debris. UN03655 . ~C082692F4 3 4.2 DISPENSER ISLANDS Evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons was not readily identifiable upon removal of the four dispenser islands. However, .a slight hydrocarbon odor (but no soil staining) was noted during the excavation of the concrete piers which had formerly supported the canopy covering the dispensers. Soil samples SSi-10, SS2-10, and SS4-7 were collected in this area after the soil containing gasoline odors had been removed (Figure 2). Soil samples SS27-6, SS28-4, and SS29-4 were collected to characterize that soil which was removed from this area and stockpiled on site. A 5'. by 10' area of soil staining was identified near the south end of the southwest dispenser island when the asphalt was remoVed. This area had been previously explored in the initial GeoResearch investigation by soil boring SB-8 (Figure 2) and corresponded to the approximate location of a fuel dispenser prior to station remodeling in 1979. Stained soil was removed and stockpiled separately along the north property boundary. 4.3 GASOLINE/WASTE-OIL USTs Soil near the fill port (center of the USTs) and the turbines (north end) was observed to be stained to a gray-green color and exhibit strong gasoline odors. Soil was also discolored and contained a gasoline odor beneath the USTs near the centers and north ends. This soil was monitored with the OVA as it was being removed in order to facilitate maintaining safe working conditions and compliance with Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD) regulations. The soil was stockpiled separately and covered with plastic. Soils near the south end of the USTs did not exhibit evidence of soil staining or have a hydrocarbon odor. Soil samples were collected to confirm the removal of soils containing gasoline. Approximately 500 cubic yards of soil was removed from around the gasoline USTs. Approximately 480 cubic yards of this~soil was determined to be clean on the basis of on-site laboratory analysis and was used as backfill in the UST excavation. Soil above and near the sides of the waste-oil UST was not observed to be stained and did not contain petroleum odors. 4.3.1 UST Removal Prior to removal, the gasoline tanks and the waste-oil tank were triple rinsed by Quality Vacuum Service of Bakersfield, California, packed with dry ice and rendered inert. The rinSate was transported to Gibson Oil Refinery for recycling. The fiberglass UN~655.TC~2692F4 gasoline USTs were crushed on-site by the excavator and transported to a local County landfill, copies of tank removal permit documents, rinsate manifest,, and gasoline tank destruction documentation are included in Appendix A. Mr. Joseph Dunwoody, Hazardous Material Specialist of the City of ~akersfield Fire Department, and Mr. Frank H. Pinnell, of Five-Star Enterprises (Unocal representative) ~ere on-site to observe the UST removal. Mr. Dunwoody approved the removal of the tanks from their respective excavations after the tanks were checked with an explosivity meter and the interior found to contain less than one percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL). After the gasoline USTs were removed from the excavation it was noted that they appeared to be in excellent condition. The tanks were. free of holes or pitting on the fiberglass walls. Holes up to 1/2 inch diameter from corrosion and corrosion pitting were observed .on the top of the waste-oil UST. The bottom and sides did not contain obvious holes; however, they were rusted and pitted. 4.4 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Soils samples which were collected on 5/14/92 and 5/15/92 were analyzed on-site by GEOTEST of Long Beach, California, a California Department of Health Services-certified mobile analytical laboratory, soils samples collected on 5/18/92 were analyzed by GEOTEST in their Long Beach, California laboratory (Appendix D). Soil samples collected from the gasoline UST excavation, near the product lines, and their associated dispensers were analyzed for .total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G) by California Department of Health Services (CAL/DOHS) methods, and for'benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) in accordance with EPA Method 8020. Soil samples collected from the waste-oil UST excavation were selectively analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method 418.1, total lead by EPA Method 7420, and halogenated volatile organics by EPA Method 8240. One sample (SP-5) was also analyzed for soluble lead. Descriptions of laboratory analytical methods are included in Appendix C. 5.0 LABORATORY RESULTS 5.1 GASOLINE TANKS Soil samples were-collected beneath each end and at the centers of each gasoline UST at 2 and 6 feet below the bottom of each excavation (Table 1). Soil sample T1-N-14 collected near the north UN03655. TCO82692F4 5 end of tank Ti at 14 feet bgs~ containedconcentrations of TPH-G of 4.2 mg/kg and BTEX concentrations of 0.013 mg/kg, 0.035 mg/kg, ND (non-detect), and· 0.015 mg/kg, respectively, according to laboratory reports.. Soil sample T1-N-18, collected at 18 feet bgs at this location did not contain detectable concentrations of TPH- G/BTEX. Soil collected 14 feet bgs beneath the north end of tank T2 (T2-N- 14) did not contain concentrations of TPH-G, benzene, or ethylbenzene; however, the soil did contain concentrations~ of toluene and total xylenes (0.020 mg/kg and 0.065 mg/kg, respectively). Soil sample T2-N-18, collected at this location 18 feet bgs contained concentrations of TPH-G of 1.2 mg/kg, toluene'of 0.006 mg/kg and total xylenes of 0.036 mg/kg. soils samples which were collected at 2 and 6 feet below the centers and south ends of the two tanks and from the tank excavation sidewalls 2 feet below the UST bottoms did not contain concentrations of TPH-G/BTEX according to laboratory reports. 5.2 FUEL DISPENSERS/PRODUCT LINES Soil samples were collected below the four fuel dispensers at 6 feet bgs and along the product lines between the~ USTs and the dispensers (Table 2). A total of twenty soil samples were collected near the fuel dispensers (Figure 2). Of these twenty soil samples, five were reported to contain TPH-G and/or BTEX above the detection limits. The highest TPH-G concentration was reported in soil Sample PL4-6 (23 mg/kg), collected beneath the southeast fuel dispenser. This sample did not contain concentrations of benzene, toluene, or ethylbenzene; however, did contain total xylenes of 0.31 mg/kg. Soil sample (PL4-9) collected 3 feet deeper at the same location was not reported to contain TPH-G/BTEX. Soil sample PL1-6, collected beneath the southwest fuel dispenser contained a concentration of TPH-G at 1.0 mg/kg. This soil sample also contained the highest reported benzene concentration of 0.033 mg/kg, according to laboratory reports. Soil sample PL1-8, collected at this same location at 8 feet below the fuel dispenser was not reported to contain TPH-G/BTEX. Soil sample PL2-6, collected beneath the northwest fuel dispenser' was reported to contain concentrations of TPH-G of 8.0 mg/kg and BTEX of 0.006 mg/kg, 0.054~ mg/kg, 0.022 mg/kg, and 0.40 mg/kg, respectively. Soil collected at this same location at 7 feet below the fuel dispenser was not reported to contain concentrations of TPH'G, benzene, toluene, or ethylbenzene; however, it did contain 0.025 mg/kg'total xylenes. UN03655 . 1C082692F4 6 Soil collected 6 feet beneath the northeast fuel dispenser (PL3,6) was not reported to contain concentrations of TPH-G/BTEX. Soil samples SSi-10, SS2-10, 'and SS3-9 were collected near the northeast and southeast dispenser islands. These samples were collected in response to petroleum odors in the soil noted during the r~moval of the concrete pier which held up the east side of the former canopy. According to laboratory reports, one of the three soil samples, SS3-9,'collected beneath the concrete pier at 9 feet ~bgs, contained concentrations of TPH-G (3.8 mg/kg)-, and BTEX (0.008 mg/kg, 0.033 mg/kg, 0.017 mg/kg,' and 0.28 mg/kg, respectively). SoiI sample SS29-4 collected from soil utilized as fill around the aboVe-mentioned concretepier, contained concentrations of TPH-G at 22 mg/kg accompanied by 0.008 mg/kg ethylbenzene and 0.024 mg/kg total xylenes. No benzene or toluene was reported in this sample. Five soil samples were collected from the excavation located at the south end of the southwest fuel dispenser (SS22-8 through SS26-8) · and were analyzed for TPH-G/BTEX. One soil sample was collected in the bottom-center at 8 feet bgs and one was collected from each sidewall at 8 feet bgs. According to laboratory reports, TPH- G/BTEX were not indicated in any of the five soil samples. 5.3 SERVICE BAY/WASTE-OIL UST Soil samples were collected beneath the two automotive hoists and the clarifier as well as from the sidewalls of ~each excavation (Table 3). Soil samples were also collected beneath the waste-oil UST and from its sidewalls. Eighteen soil samples were collected f~rom this area and analyzed for TRPH. Four of these samples (Hi-C- 9, H1-N-11, SS15-9, and SS16-9) contained concentrations of TRPH above detection limits. The soil samples collected beneath the center of the waste-oil UST were also analyzed for total lead (EPA Method 7420) and volatile organics (EPA Method 8240) (Table 4). Soil sample H1-C-9, collected directly below the northernmost automotive hoist at 9 feet · bgs, was reported to contain a concentration of TRPH at 230 mg/kg. Subsequently, soil sample Hi- C-ii was collected two feet deeper in same location. This .soil sample was not' reported to contain concentrations of TRPH. Soil sample HI-N-ii, collected from the north sidewall of the' same excavation, was reported to contain TRPH at 38 mg/kg. Additional soil was removed from the north wall and soil sample H1-N2-11 was collected. This soil did not contain TRPH according to laboratory reports. Soil collected adjacent to .the southernmost automotive hoist did not contain concentrations of TRPH according to laboratory reports. UN03655. TC082692 F4 Soil samples collected from the bottom-center of the waste-oil UST excavation did not contain concentrations of TRPH, total lead, or volatile organics, according to laboratory reports. Soil samples collected from the east sidewall ~ (SS15-9) and from the west sidewall (SSi6-9); however, contained TRPH concentrations of 450 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg, respectively. Subsequently, additional soil was removed from the east wall and four soil samples collected from the eaSt wall. The four samples (WO1-9, WO2-6, WO3-9, and WO4-6) were analyzed for TRPH on-site by GEOTEST and were not reported to contain detectable concentrations. 6.0 STOCKPILED SOIL Seven soil stockpiles were generated on-site from excavation activities (Figure 2) . Four of these stockpiles initially contained concentrations of TRPH and/or TPH-G/BTEX, according to laboratory reports (Table 6) . Those stockpiles shown by laboratory analyses to contain no significant concentrations of TPH-G or BTEX were utilized as backfill within the gasoline UST excavation. All stockpiles were monitored with an organic vapor analyzer in order to facilitate compliance with KCAPCD emission limitations. No stockpiles required covering. Soil generated from the excavation near the southwest fuel dispenser was stockpiled near the north property boundary. Soil stockpile samples were subsequently collected (SP-1, SP-2, and SP- 3) and composited by the laboratory for one TPH-G/BTEX and total lead analysis. According to laboratory rep.orts, this composite sample contained a TPH-G concentration of 49 mg/kg and toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes of 0.058 mg/kg, 0.046 mg/kg, and 2.7 mg/kg, respectively. Total lead was reported to be 41 mg/kg. Eleven days later the stockpile was surveyed with an organic vapor analyzer, taking care to monitor the interior of the stockpile. No OVA readings in excess of background were recorded. One soil sample was collected from the stockpile (SP,A) and analyzed for TPH-G/BTEX. Laboratory reports for soil sample SP-A indicated that the TPH-G, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes were no longer present in the soil. This soil (approximately 60 Cubic yards) was utilized as backfill in the excavation from which it was removed .and/or the gasoline UST excavation. Soil which was removed from beneath and around the dispenser islands was stockpiled on the west edge of property boundary. Soil samples SP-4, SP-5, and SP-6 were collected from this stockpile. These samples were composited by the laboratory and analyzed for one TPH-G/BTEX and total lead analysis. According to laboratory reports, TPH-G/BTEX concentrations were not above detection limits; however, total lead was 10 times 'above the STLC and was therefore subsequently analyzed for the concentration of soluble lead. The UN03655. TC082692 F4 8 soluble lead analysis did not indicate concentrations of lead above the detection limits. This soil (approximately 65 cubic yards) remains stockpiled on site and appears suitable for use as clean backfill. Soil which was removed from beneath and around the gasoline USTs was stockpiled on the south rim of the UST excavation and in the northeast corner of the property. Four soil samples (SP-7, SP-8, SP-9, SP-10) were collected from the northeast corner stockpile. Samples SP-8 and SP-9 were composited by the laboratory for one TPH-G/BTEX -analyses. Samples SP-7 and SP-10 were analyzed individually for TPH-G/BTEX. According to laboratory reports these samples did not contain concentrations above detection limits. This soil (approximately 250 cubic yards) was used as clean backfill in the gasoline UST excavation. Four soil samples were collected from the stockpiled soil located on the south rim UST excavation (SP-14, SP-15, SP-16, and SP-17). Soil samples SP-14 and SP-15 were composited by the laboratory for one TPH-G/BTEX analysis as well as soil samples SP-16 and SP-17. According to laboratory reports, these soil samples did not contain concentrations above detection limits. This soil (approximately 230 cubic yards) was used as clean backfill in the gasoline UST excavation. Soil samples SP-18 and SP-19 were alSo collected from stockpiled soil which was removed from the tops of the gasoline USTs. These samples were composited by the laboratory and analyzed for TPH- G/BTEX. According to laboratory analysis, TPH-G was reported to be 3.1 mg/kg; however, concentrations of BTEX were not reported to be above detection limits. This stockpile was subsequently monitored with an organic vapor analyzer (h-nu) and no readings inexcess of background were recorded. The stockpile (approximately 20 cubic yards) was utilized as backfill within the UST excavation. Soil sample SP'll, .collected from the waste-oil excavation stockpile, contained a concentration of TRPH of 310 mg/kg. This sample was also analyzed for TPH-G/BTEX; however, these constituents were not detected, according to laboratory reports. Soil samples SP-12 and SP-13 were collected from stockpiled soil removed from the northernmost automotive hoist excavation. These soil samples were composited by the laboratory and analyzed for TRPH and TPH-G/BTEX. TRPH concentrations were reported to be as high as 320 mg/kg; however, TPH-G/BTEX were not detected. These two stockpiles, with a combined volume of approximately 21 cubic yards, are suitable for off-site disposal as Class II material. 7.0 BACKFILL/COMPACTION AND CONFIRMATION SAMPLING The gasoline UST excavation was backfilled eleven days after the UNO3655.TCO82692F4 9 UST remOval utilizing on-site stockpiled soil and imported soil. The stockpiled soil used as backfill was screened utilizing laboratory analysis and was determined to be suitable. Imported soil utilized to. account for the volume of the former USTs was compacted to 90% of its original compaction by Golden Valley ~Testing of Bakersfield, California and certified by a registered civil engineer (Appendix A). This imported soil was also sampled (TP-1) and Was analyzed by GEOTEST for TRPH, TPH-G/BTEX, and total lead (TabLe 7). According to laboratory reports, concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons or total lead were not detected. 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Soils with staining and/or petroleum odors were observed in two areas during station demolition; in the gasoline UST excavation and near the fuel dispenser islands. Such soils were excavated, stockpiled on site, and characterized. The hydrocarbon releases appeared to have resulted from overspillage from the gasoline tanks and spillage and/or minor leakage within the dispenser area. sixty soil samples were collected to evaluate the site. Only low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were.found at the site. The north end of the gasoline UST excavation contained soil left in-place at the time of tank removal which contained concentrations of TPH-G of 1.2 mg/kg and toluene and total xylenes of 0.036 mg/kg. The area between the eastern gasoline dispensers, contained soil of with concentrations of TPH-G (SS3-9) of 3.9 and BTEX of 0.008, 0.033, 0.017, and 0.28 mg/kg. All other soil demonstrated to contain petroleum hydrocarbons was excavated and clean (below laboratory detection limits) confirmation samples were collected. Seven soil stockpiles were generated on-site from excavation activities. Four of these stockpiles were shown by laboratory analyses to contain no significant concentrations of TPH-G or BTEX were utilized as backfill within the gasoline UST excavation. Soil stockpiled from the waste-oil UST and automotive hoist excavations (approximately 21 cubic yards) is still on-site and will be disposed at a Class II facility in conjunction with other on-site soil pertaining to the septic system which is not part of this investigation. The remaining stock pile (65 cubic yards), which has been demonstrated to be clean, may be utilized as fill. for the septic system excavations. There is no apParent need for further soil remediation at this UST site. Closure of this site is appropriate. UN03655 . ?C082692 F4 10 TABLE 1 RESULTS OF TPH-G AND BTEX ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE GASOLINE UST EXCAVATION UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE SAMPLE TPH-G B T E X ID DATE (DOHS) EPA METHOD 8020 mg/kg (mg/kg) T1-N-14 5/15/92 4.2 0.013 0.035 ND 0.015 T1-N-18 " ND ND ND ND ND T2-N-14 " ND ND 0.020 ND '0.065 T2-N-18 " 1.2 ND 0.006 ND 0.036 T1-S'14 " ND ND ND ND ND T1-S-18 " ND ND ND ND ND T2-S-14 " ND ND ND ND ND T2-S-18 " ND ND ND ND ND SS5-14 " ND ND ND ND ND SS6-18 " ND ND ND ND ND SS7-14 " ND ND ND ND ND SS8-18 "' ND ND. ND ND ND SS9-14 " ND ND ND ND ND SSl0-14 " ND ND ND ND ND SSl1-14 " ND ND ND ND ND SS12-14 " ND ND ND ND ND DETECTION LIMITS 1.0 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.015 ---mg/kg ........ UN03655 . TCO82692F4 TABLE 2 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED NEAR THE DISPENSER ISLANDS UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE SAMPLE TPH-G B T E X ID DATE (DOHS) EPA METHOD 8020 mg/kg (mg/kg) ~PL1-6 5/14/92 1.0 0.033 0.15 0.020 0.14 PL1-8 " ND ND ND ND ND PL2-6 " 8.0 0.006 0.054 0.022 0.40 PL2-7 ,, ND ND ND ND 0..025 PL3-6 " ND ND ND ND ND PL4-6 " 23 ND ND ND 0.31 PL4-9 " ND ND ND ND ND PL5-6 " ND ND ND ND ND SSl-10 5/15/92 ND ND ND ND ND SS2-10 " ND ND ND ND ND SS3-9 " 3.8 0.008 0.033 0.017 0.28 SS4-7 " ND ND ND ND ND SS22-8 5/18/92 ND ND ND ND ND SS23-8 " ND ND ND ND ND S824-8 " ND ND ND ND ND SS25-8 " ND ND ND ND ND SS26-8 " ND ND ND ND ND SS27-6 " ND ND· ND ND ND SS28-4 " ~ND ND ND ND ND SS29-4 " 22 ND ND 0.008 0.024 DETECTION LIMITS 1.0 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 ................. mg/kg ................ UN03655. TCO82692F4 TABLE 3 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE SERVICE BAY/WASTE-OIL UST AREA UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE ID SAMPLE DATE EPA METHOD EPA METHOD 418.1 7420 (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Hi-C-9 5-14-92 230 na H1-C-11 " ND na Hi-S-il " ND na H1-E-11 " ND na H l-W- 11 " ND n a H1-N-11 " 38 ~na H1-N2-11 "~ ND na H2-C-9 " ND na H2-S-9· " ND na H2-E-9 " ND na H2-W-9 " ND na H2-N-9 " ND na T3-C-9 5/15/92 ND ND T3-C-13 " ND ND SS13-9 5/18/92 ND na SS14-9 " ND na SS15-9 " 450 na SS16-9 " 20 na SS17-7 " ND na DETECTION LIMITS 10 5.0 (mg/kg) UNO3655.TCO82692F4 TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) SAMPLE ID SAMPLE DATE EPA METHOD EPA METHOD 418.1 7420 (mg/kg) (mg/kg) SS18-7 5/18/92 na na SS19-7~ " na na SS20-7 " na na SS21-7 " na na WO1-9' 7/01/92 ND na WO2-6' " ND na WO3-9' " ND na W04-6' " ND na DETECTION LIMITS '10 5.0 (mg/kg) UN03655 . TCO82692F4 TABLE 4 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLE T3-C-9 EPA METHOD 8240 COLLECTED IN THE WASTE-OIL UST AREA UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA COMPOUNDS SAMPLE EPA METHOD DETECTION DATE 8240 LIMIT (~g/kg) (~g/kg) Chloromethane 5/15/92 ND 5.0 Bromomethane ', ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride " ND 5.0 Chloroethane " ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane " ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene " ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride " ND 10 1,1-Dichloroethane " ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene " ND 5.0 Chloroform " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane " ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane " ND 5.0 Carbon Tetrachloride " ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane " ND 5.0 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene " ND 5.0 Trichlorethene " ND 5.0 Dibromochloromethane " ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane " ND 5.0 Benzene " ND 5.0 UN03655. ]~C082692F4 TABLE 4 (Continued) COMPOUNDS SAMPLE EPA METHOD DETECTION DATE 8240 LIMIT (mg/kg) (~g/kg) trans-l,3- dichlorpropene 05/12/92 ND 5.0 Bromoform " ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethane '" ND 5.0 1,1,2,2- " ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethane Toluene " ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene " ND 5.0 Ethlybenzene " ND 5.0 m,p-xylenes " ND 5.0 o-xylenes " ND 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 UN03655 . TC082692 F4 TABLE 5 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLE T3-C-13 EPA METHOD 8240 COLLECTED IN THE WASTE-OIL UST AREA UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA COMPOUNDS SAMPLE EPA METHOD DETECT. DATE 8240 LIMIT (~g/kg) (~g/kg) Chloromethane 04/28/92 ND 5.0 Bromomethane " ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ,, ND 5.0~ Chloroethane " ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane " ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene " ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride " ND 10 1,1-Dichloroethane " ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene " ND 5.0 Chloroform " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane "~ ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane " ND 5.0 ~Carbon Tetrachloride " ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane " ND 5.0 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ,, ND 5.0 Trichlorethene " ND 5.0 Dibromochloromethane " ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane " ND ~5.0 Benzene " ND 5.0 UNO3655.TCO82692F4 TABLE 5 (Continued) COMPOUNDS SAMPLE EPA METHOD DETECTION DATE 8240- LIMIT (mg/kg) (gg/kg) trans-l,3- 04/28/92 ND 5.0 dichloropropene Bromoform " ND 5.0 tetrachloroethene " ND 5.0 1,1,2,2- " ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethane Toluene " ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene " ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene " ND 5.0 m,p-Xylenes " ND 5.0 o-Xylenes " ND 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 . 1,4-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene " ND 5.0 UN03655 . TCO82692F4 TABLE 6 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM SOIL STOCKPILES UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE SAMPLE TRPH TPH-G B T E X TOT. SOL. ID DATE LEAD LEAD SP-i* 5/18/92 SP-2* na 49 ND 0.058 0.046 2.7 41 na SP-3* SP-4, ,, SP-5* na ND ND ND ND ND 60 ND SP-6* SP-7 " na ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-8* " na ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-9* SP-10 " na ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-11 " 310 ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-12* " 320 ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-13* SP-14* " na ND ND ND ND ND na na SP'15* SP-16* " na ND ND ND ND ND na na SP-17* SP-18* " na 3.1 ND ND ND ND na na SP-19* SP'A 5/29/92 na ND ND ND ND ND na na DETECTION LIMITS 10 1.0 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 5.0 .020 METHOD EPA CAL/ ........ EPA 8020 7420 STLC 418'.1 DOHS LEAD UN03655 . TCO82692F4 TABLE 7 LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL sAMPLEs COLLECTED FROM IMPORTED BACKFILL MATERIAL IN THE GASOLINE UST PIT UNOCAL SERVICE STATION NO. 3655 2600 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE SAMPLE TRPH TPH-G B T E X Tot. ID 'DATE .......... mg/kg--- Lead LDL 10 1.0 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 5.0 METHOD EPA CAL/ ........... EPA 8020 EPA 418.1 DOHS 7420 NOTES FOR TABLES: TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons asGasoline TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons B = Benzene T = Toluene E = Ethylbenzene X = total Xylenes CAL/DOHS = California Department 0f Health Services EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ~g/kg = micrograms per kilogram mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram ND = Not Detected at laboratory detection limits * = Samples composited for one analyses SOL. = Soluble TOT. = Total UN03655 . TCO82692F4 APPENDIX A PERMITS/DOCUMENTATION UST REMOVAL, UST RINSATE MANIFEST, UST DESTRUCTION DOCUMENT, SOIL COMPACTION CERTIFICATE UN03655 . TC072192 F4 _~ PLANNING · ENGINEERING · cONSTRUOTION MANAG[MENT 207 W. ~A. S~. 202 · BU~NK. ~. 91508 · PHONE: 818~2~4 · F~ 818~4~7~ May 4, 1992 SolRac Enterprises 833 Meridian Irwindale, CA 91010 ATTN: Rob RE: Unocal sS# 3655 3600 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA DEMOLITION PERMITS Dear Rob: Per our conversation earlier today, attached are the following Permits and Plans for the demolition of the subject location: PERMIT TYPE PERMIT [! INSPECTION Building Demo, 92-012187 805-326-3728 for removing the U.G' Tanks, Sewer cap, as well~ as inspection card Fire Dept Permit BR-0047 805-326'--3979 As you know, due to limitations by Kern Co. A.P.C.D. and E.P.A., demolition' of the site cannot start, until May 7, 1992. If you have any qu0stions please give me a call at 818-842-3644. --~ /Ah'mad Ghaderi ' 10602 ~¢.A.c~ pAPC<VVAY NORTH, ST'E. 509 · PONCHO ~CNGA. CA. 91730 ' TELEPH~)NE: 714~.66-0562 ', ": Bakersfield Fire Dept. ~ERMII 27,,..,,.,,,; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT A;~PLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION FACILITY NAME ~c:~ ~-~-l-~"r't.o I't CROSS STREET TANK OWNER/OPERATOR t,lklOCl::tt_ PHONE No. (~"z47,) Cf'T'/° CONTRACTOR INFORMATION INSURANCE CARRIER WORKMENS COMP No. PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION COMPANY /,i"Af:'/2~z,t,J ~F____.E2. PHONE No.(51O'.) GO~-~/d~) LICENSE No. INSURANCE CARRIER WORKMENS COMP No. TANK CLEANING INFORMATION COMPANY ~>/:~'~"~/~,~ PHONE No. WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER oc>~'7 . ~"P.O ~ c::A,r) NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILITY ~ll [B~::::~Ix/ OIL... ~ l'2-~F. 152o. ! P,/~---,. TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANY ~ rD 1~ PHONE No. ('~0~) '~7--.~"t'/~I~LICENSE No. TANK INFORMATION TANK No.' AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES .CHEMICAL '-'-~' STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED ....... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: !!?':~: :ii~::':~iii ::::!i'"~:'":~:':~iii:'"'i?'i'"':: ...... ~:~::-...::i~(~i!~' .:~::~::~?:'¢:~::~::!::iiii~i?:: 'Gi!~OEi~::i::~Z~N K8::~¢ii~i?'!~i.!.i~:'::~i~iii~i~i~iil~ EE~:.¢i:.i~!:~:-.. ~:-. ~i~' THE APPuCANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS. AND WILL COMPLY WIIH THE A,AC,ED CONDITIONS OF THIS PfiRMIT ANO ANY OTHER ST,~TE, LOCAL A ND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. · ~X THIS FO~M HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PErJUrY, AND TO THE BES[ OF MY KNOWLED~ IS TRUE A~ CO 2~ECT. ~ "" . :TH S APPUCATJON B.COM[S A P MiTu ..ff, CT.o' .Ec& ' , '. C~TY BU"LD]NG DEPARTMENT ~... .. BAKERSFIELD, CALiFORNiA POST In a ConspicuOus Place at the Job Site for Duration of WOrk. ~' DO NOT remove this Card until Final Building Inspection has Been Signed. DO NOT cover, up any work until inspected and signed by Inspector Phone 326-3728 · Inspector Inspector INSPECTiO[~I & Date INSPECTION & Date STRUCTURAL PLUMBIr~IG MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL · ALL IUPROVEUENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, COI~,'IPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE _m PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTi'~IENT PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF ANY STRUCTURE. FINAL PLU~,~1BING FINAL MECHANICAL FINAL ELECTRIC F~ FINAL BJILDING & SITE WORK Building Address ~'00 ~ ~'r'C~_ '~ J- Bidg.~Opermit No. ?2.--02~/8~' ' Ti'Act- . Block Lot ElecL'Permit No. .. Owner ~'}'~ 0 (Z/Jr~ Arch.-Eng.,.' Plumb. Permit No. , 3ontractm:_ ~-0 / ~'~) (" ;.,',.ech.. Permit No. ' :'~" .... CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1501 TRUXTUN AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 . BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT INFO Permit No..,: 92-02189 Applied..: 05/01/1992 Permit Type: MISC Approved.: 05/01/1992 Type ....... : DMO Completed: Status ..... : APPROVED To Expire: 10/28/1992 LOCATION Job Address: 3600 PIERCE RD Location...: Description: DEMO EXIST-GAS STATION/ REMOVE TANKS AND CAP SEWER Tr/No/Lot..: TR Parcel...: Zone. · .: M-1 SPR No...: .School Diet: Park Diet: Cond Sq'Ft.: CONSTRUCTION Occ Class..: B-2 Occ No...: Type Const.: V-N Code ..... : 1988 UBC Fire Sprlk.: N 49 PEOPLE Owner ...... : UNOCAL LOGAN FRAME Phone No.: 818 347-6515 Applicant..: A & S ENGINEERING Phone No.: 818 347-6515 Arch/Engr..: Phone No.: Contractor.: Phone No.: Cont Lic No: Exp Date.: Cont Addr..: FEES Plan Check.: .00 Total Sq Ft...: Permit Fees: 60.00 Permit Val..'..: 50,500.00 Fire Sprlk.: .00 Fire Sprlk Val: .00 Bond ....... : .00 Bond Valuation: .00 School Fee.: .00 Tot Valuation.: 50,500.0.0 Park Fee...: .00 Tot Calc Fee..: 60.00 Habitat Fee: .00 Additonal Fee.: .00 Special Ins: .00 Tot Permit Fee: 60.00 Additional.: .00 Payments ...... : 60.00 Double Fee.: .00 Balance Due...: ..00 DECLARATIONS .. CALL FOR INSPECTION Permit is issued in accordance wi[h all applicable F~.'deraJ, State and Local 24 Hour Recorder Number (805) 326-3728 O,-dinance~. The permiffee has properly signed and-dated the reverse side of this fcrm. Please state the Permit Number. the Job Address, and the Type of Inspection. Request for inspections should be Th{s permit expires after 180 days ~f in&ctivity~ ~.~ made at least twenty-four hours in advance. I ha~"e reviewed th~bove applicatid/'n, and find it t ~e correct/complete: Inspectors office hours are: Permittee: ./. I ' ~ IIAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATEMENT __Yes __No Will the applicant or future occupant handle hazardou~ material or a mixture containing a i~azardous material equal to or greater than the amounts specified on the list of extremely hazardous substances? See checklist for guidelines. ' ' .__Yes ~No Will the proposed building or modified facility be within I000 feet of the outer boundary of a school? '- _Yes __No . Will the intended use of the building by the applicant or future building occupant require a permit for construction or modification from thc Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD) or from thc City of Bak. Fire Dept? Sec checklist for guidelines. , ~Ycs ~No I have read thc Hazardous Material Guide and thc KCAPCD Permitting Checklist. I understand my requirements under thc Calif. · ' Health and Safety ~odc Sec. 6.95 and/~-lif. Govt. See. 65850 and the requirements of thc City of Bakersfield Fire Dept. regarding ' hazardous materialLs. / // ~- ~- _ . : Owner or Authorized Agent nc N (23 tC 65~ /- LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION . .. ':: ', I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisious of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of thee'Division of the Business and Professions Code and my license is in full force and effect. ~} I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the~following~cason (Sec. '/031.5 B~ness and Professions Code: · city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demol~s!~pair any structure p"~-"~ior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 or the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)): I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (sec. 7044 Business and Professions Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds . or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or herself through his or her own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for ~ale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not building or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (sec, '/044 B~iness and Professions Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who contracts for such ._ project with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor~ License Law). I am exempt under Sec. B.&P.C. for this reason Owner Signature ~[~ (~[I~U~t~J~ Date WORKERS COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to s~:lf-insure or a certificate of Workers' Compensation insurance or a certified copy thereof (See 3800.Lab.C.). Policy No. Company. Certified copy is hereby furnished /~ ~ section ne~6e completed if the p~r one hundred dollars ($100)or less. I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I s~all not employ any person in any manner so a~ to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California. NOTICE TO .,MPPLICANT: If after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers Compunction provision~ of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked.. - Applicant Signature Date CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which tl~is permit i~ issued (Sec. 309'/Civ. C~). LendersName LendersAddress I certify that I ha,~ read this a££b.'c.~i, on and state that tl*e informatio~contair,.cd l'.o¥in is correct. I agree to comply with all city ordinanc~ and sta~ taw~ ~ relaling to btzildi'ng construcfi'on and hereby a~horige rePresentati,z~.~...[of tim city to e..ffe.~lhe abow-~ntioned Froperty for inspection ? APPROVED BUILDING~RECTOR By. "-J// Date FROI'I '50LRAC EHTERF'E:ISES 08. 11 . 1992 07:57 P. 1 ~ WASTE M~NIFEST j.i~i it*]~ , '~.:T~lnep~et ~ ~p~ny Name e. U6 ~PA ~ Humb~ E. ~tate Tr~er'e ~ , I I I I I ! I ~*~"'""""~:t,: d · 4, '~ ," ,"' "::' L '.'~' _ ........ I_1 .J I I I I ":'".-'" "?: T FRO~I SOLRAC ENTERPRISES 08. 11. 1992 07:~5 P. GIBSON 'Oil & REFINING CO., INC. WEIGHT TAG NUMBER 3~ TRU~UN AVENUE, SUITE ~ ~/~ 7/.,' ..: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 DAT~ ' ' ' (~05) 327~13 . _ .... .~- ~_ ~~~ ~/ M~ST~ " DESTI~TION: GI~ON OIL ~FINERY I INVOICE TO:~ "- ~MMERO~ D~VE I PRICE', ~RRIER, I _C~RRRIER RELEASE, ~MMOD~Y ..... ~D~ { ~H I GRAV, N~GALLON~L~ :RIVED TO UNLOAD '/ ~ART TO UNLOAD FINI~ UNLOADING SOLIDS % p~ ~~PM ..... PM WASHOUT ~~'---' :.. ~ADED FROM UNLOADED TO GALLONS DEDUCT ~ BARRELS [M~KS I RECEIPT T~KET /: 6~6.22 FROH OLRAC EHTE~ '... ~ ' .-; ....... ~,-,- ~,- . ,r,.4. .-',,'~.!~" ;'~-? "' I I " FortsOn ~' , : ,onstrucbon 17418 Dtth~ Ro~ i ,=_] Purcp~e Of0er ~o. ~_~ ' .......... ~ ~~N ~ WORK ............ ,, : ............ ~- .................... ~/~ ........ , .... ~.. .. "~-~ ~ '~ ~.;~,,~..~'~ . _ ; -~~..,~ ...... : .... ~-~-~~~~ .......................................... ..........._~ ................. e~~_ ,~ ............... ~ ..... -~- ~ ................... , : } ............. :... ,. , ~ ~ *TOP ~U I ..................................,r L-' I ~o~t ~ouao : ....... ..... ~.~ ......... ..... .--.-~.- TO~AL T~x ~ OflAND TOT&L8 YOTAL' -... ~ATERIALS* ~QUIPMENTt~BOR" ' Em~lOye~ Name TRAVEL' ~ TOTAL DUE A~thOdzed Signe[ure .............................................. .:'" GOLDEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. \~/ 1121 West ColUmbus Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Tel. {805} 327-7645 _ FAX {805} 327-5601 SOILS * CONCRETE * ASPHALT June 2, 1992 Job No. 3475' RECEIVED GE0 RESEARCH Solrac Enterprises 833 Meridian Duarte, CA 91010 Attention: Mr. Rob Tachovsky RE: Compaction tests in tank removal backfill at Rosedale Hwy. & Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, California. Gentlemen: Submitted herewith are results of relative compaction tests taken at the subject site between May 28 and June 1, 1992. If you should have questions in this regard or if we can be of further service to you, please call anytime. .Respectfully. Submitted, GOLDEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. R.C.E. 24932, Exp: 12/31/93 /jeb enclosures cc: 2-addressee 1-Mr. Jim Fortson Fortson Construction Co. 17418 Duhn Rd. Bakersfield, CA' 93312 pg. 1 ' AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE · KERN COUNT~' BUILDERS' EXCHANGE. INC. SOlrac.Enterprises Job No. 3475 Tank removal backfill 6/2/92 Ros~dale Hwy. S Pierce Rd. . 'Bakers field, Ca. pg. 2 TABLE 1 In-Place Density - Relative Compaction ASTM Test Method D2922 Compact, ion Required ~ .90% Test Date Depth Below Moisture In-Place Maximum Existing Content, Density, Density, Relative No. 1992 Location Grade % of dry wt. lbs/ft.3 lbs/ft.3 .Compaction 1 5/28 Center of excavation 6'-7' 8.9% 120.0 12'9.4 93% 2 5/29 Center of excavation 4'-5' 7.2% 118.1 129.4 92% 3 5/29 Center of excavation 2'-3' 9.2% 106.8 115.0 92% 4 6/1 Center of excavation 0'-1' 6.2% 116.2 129.4'. 90% TABLE 2 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture ASTM D1557-78 (Method A) Opt imum Max imum Date Moisture Content, Dry. Density, 1992 Location Soil Description % of dry wt. lbs/cu, ft. 5/28 Stockpile Dark brown, silty, fine to medium 5.8% 129.4 sand. 529 Import Stockpile Light olive-brown, silty, fine 11.5% 115~0 · sand. APPENDIX B GEORESEARCH SAMPLING PROCEDURES UN03655 . TC072192F4 GEORESEARCH SOIL sAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS The following procedures are utilized for the collection of soil samples: · i. Soil samples are obtained under the direction of a professional engineer', geologist, or authorized representative of a State-approved laboratory. Sample numbers and locations are approved by the city/county inspector, if present on-site. ii. All soil samples at tank removal sites are taken from the backhoe bucket, unless the excavation has been safely graded or shored. Soil samples will be collected from the interior portions of the excavator bucket, away from the bucket's edges and teeth, to avoid potential cross- contamination. Approximately one inch of soil is removed from the surface area where the sample is to be collected and a clean, 6-inch 'long, 1-inch minimum ' diameter brass ring will be pounded into the soil using a wooden mallet, or equivalent tool. No headspace will be present in the ring once the sample is collected. iii. In shallow, excavations, as in under.product lines, soil samples may be taken by driving the brass tube directly into the trench sidewall. iv. Soil samples are collected in thin-walled stainless steel or brass cylinders 6" long by 1.5" or 2" diameter. Cylinders are pounded into the soil with a wooden mallet or equivalent method when not using an auger or drilling equipment. v. Each end of the cylinder is'covered with aluminum foil, capped with polyethylene lids, taped, and labeled. vi. Samples are transported in an ice chest containing blue ice or equivalent and kept at approximately 4 degrees centigrade until delivery to a California Department of Health Services-approved analytical laboratory. vii. Chain-of-custody records produced in accordance with U.S. E.P.A. requirements are kept to track the possession of a sample from the time it is taken in the field until the time it is analyzedl UN~655.~CO~192F4 APPENDIX C SUMMARIES OF ANALYTICAL METHODS: SOIL SAMPLES UNO3655.TCO72192F4 SUMMARIES OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL METHODS: SOIL SAMPLES The following briefly describes laboratory analyses performed on soil samples in accordance with the specified EPA or California Department of Health Services methods. EPA Method 418.1: Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons The strict EPA method is for water samples only. For soil samples the soil is extracted with Freon. The Freon is treated with silica gel to remove biological acids. The IR absorbance of the extract is then measured to determine the total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbon (TRPH) content. EPA Method 8020: Volatile Aromatic Orqanics Volatile aromatics are determined by purge and trap followed by gas chromatography/photoionization detector (GC/PID). Normally only Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and total Xylenes are analyzed with this method. A small amount of sample (about 1 gram) is placed in a purge vessel and 5 ml water added. The sample is purged for a specific time and the volatiles absorbed on a trap. After purging the trap is heated and the volatiles swept into the GC. The analytes are separated using a capillary column and detected using a photoionization detector. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Gasoline The volatile components of gasoline are determined by purge and trap followed by gas chromatography/flame ionization detector (GC/FID). A small amount of sample (about 1 gram) is placed in a purge vessel and 5 ml water added. The sample is purged for a specific time and the volatiles absorbed on a trap. After purging the trap is heated and the volatiles swept into the GC. The analytes are separated using a capillary column and detected using an FID. The total petroleum hydrocarbon as gasoline (TPH-G) is determined as the total amount of volatiles detected. EPA Method 7421: Total Lead Total lead concentrations in soil samples are determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The sample is vaporized in a graphite furnace; a light source is passed through the vapor. The lead atoms absorb the radiation at characteristic wavelengths. This degree of absorption is measured photoelectrically for determination of total lead concentrations~ UN03655. ]'C072192F4 APPENDIX D CHAIN OF CUSTODY DocUMENTS AND LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS UNO3655.TCO?2192F4 GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 908090911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , 05/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED~ O5/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 924OO-17 ANALYSES, TPH-G PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATIONs 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROHATOGRAPHY CAL/DOHS TPH FOR GASOLINE SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mu/kg) (mu/kg) SS1-10 ND 1.O SS2-10 ND 1.O SS3-9 3.8 1.O T1-N-14 4.2 1.O T1-N-18 ND 1.O SS4-7 ND 1.O T2-N-14' ND 1.0 T2-N-18 1.2 1.0 SS5-14 ND 1.O Analyst, AM Reviewed and Approved: Report date, This report pertains only to the sample's ~investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client t° whom it is addressed. GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. __m m m -- m GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Be~ch, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service AMENDED LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED = O5/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: O5/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.': 92400-17 ANALYSES: BTEX PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL'#3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AROMATICS EPA METHOD 8020 COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XXLENES (mg/kg} (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) DETECTION LIMITS 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.015 SAMPLE ID SSl-10 ND ND ND ND SS2-10 ND ND ND ND SS3-9 0.008 0.033 O.O17 0.28 T1-N-14 0.O13 0.035 ND' O.O15 T1-N-18 ND ND ND ND SS4-7 'ND ND ND ND T2-N-14 ND 0.020 ND 0.065 T2,N-18 ND 0.006 ND 0.036 SS5-14 ND ND ND ND ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection./ Analyst: AM Reviewed and Approved: Report da~e-: This report pertains only to' the sampler investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or'.similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a,Califomia Corporation. GEOTEST ~o~ office Box 90911, Long Beach, California g080g-0911 (310)49~9515 (800)62~5744 An Environmental Monitoring and ~sting ~ce QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME~ GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1623 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 Analyses prep method,5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL ~3655 Analyses method,8020 DATE ANALYZED~ 05/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total X¥1enes ND 0.015 % A~I~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 104 70-130% Toluene 100 70-130% Eth¥1benzene 89 70-130% Total Xylenes 103 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE Benzene 105 70-130% Toluene 105 70-130% Ethylbenzene 104 70-130% Total Xylenes 104 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 95 70-130% Toluene 96 70-130% Eth¥1benzene 97 70-130% Total X¥1enes ~~/ 97 70-130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: . GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a Cali;[omia corpOration.. ORIGINAL GEOTEST ~os, Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY QUALITY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 Analyses prep method,5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method,8020 DATE ANALYZED: O5/18/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (ag/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total Xylenes ND 0.015 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 89 70-130% Toluene- 87 70-130% Ethylbenzene 87 70-130% Total Xylenes 86 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE Benzene 105 70-130% Toluene 104 70-130% Ethylbenzene ' 102 70-130% Total Xylenes 102 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 97 70-130% Toluene 97 70-130% Ethylbenzene 97 70-130% Total Xylenes . _/~/ /~ // 97 70-130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia-.corpomtion: ORI~I~I~T GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800)624-5?44 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED' = ' 05/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE. RECEIgED, 05/15/92' FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION,* WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.~ 92400-17 ANALYSES= 7420 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION= 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) T3-C-9 ND 5.0 T3-C-13 ND 5.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, SC Reviewed and Approved, Report date= This report pertains only to the samples investigated "a~'~ does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client, to whom it is addressed. .' GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. · * OFUGINAL GEOTEST ~o~ office Box gog11, Long Beach, California g080g-0911 (310)498-9.515 (800)624-.5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME~ GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mu/kg) (mu/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 5.0 .............. % ....... ~~]~L~~G E ACCURACY LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 105 70 - 130% % ACC~PTAB~E--'~-~'GE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 101 70 - 130% % ~'~'EPT~BLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 99 70 - 130% Checked and Approved: ~Report Date: GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation... ORI~IN~ GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 0§/15/92 1'713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 05/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIXs SOIL ATTENTIONs WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID s 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 924OO-17 ANALYSES: 8240 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATIONs 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA PAGE 1 OF 2 SAMPLE ID: T3-C-9 ANALYSIS Off VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/ MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 8240 COMPOUNDS RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Chloromethane ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Vinyl chloride ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride ND 10 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Chloroform ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachioride ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 ND - Not detected below, indicated limit of detection. : Reviewed and Approved: Analyst PT Report date:' ' This report pertains only to the samples"investigate'd ...... ~ does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This .report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation, nb,n, GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box g0gl 1, Long Bemch, California g0809-og11 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Se~ce LABORATORY REPORT 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: O5/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 ~ GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 924OO-17 ANALYSES: 8240 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA PAGE 2 OF 2 SAMPLE ID: T3-C-9 A~ysis O~ vOLAT~L~ OR~N~CS"BY"GAs'""'CHROMAT~G~Ph~'~ MASS SPECTROMETRY BY EPA METHOD 8240 COMPOUNDS RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (ug/kg) (ug/kg) cis-!, 3-Dichloropropene ND 5. O Trichloroethene ND 5. O Dibromochloromethane ND 5.O 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5. O Benzene ND 5. O trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5. O Tetrachloroethene ND 5. O 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5. O Toluene ND 5. O Chlorobenzene ND 5. O Et.hylbenzene ND 5. O m, p.-Xyle ne s ND 5.0 o-Xylene ND 5. O 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.O 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 ND - Not detected be low indicated limit of detection. ~/~~ . / Approved .-//~'/ Analyst.. PT Reviewed a"n5portKe date: ~-, This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials 'This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. .no',n,~, ~, *GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, LongBeach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring - and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , 05/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE~ 113 DATE RECEIVED~ 05/15/92. FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/29/92 SAMPLE.MATRIX~ SOIL ATTENTION: ~WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID' : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.= 92400-17 ANALYSES, 8240 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION= 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA PAGE 1 OF 2 SAMPLE ID, T3-C-13 ANALYSIS Off VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/ MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 8240 COMPOUNDS RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Chloromethane ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Vinyl chloride ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 TriChlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride ND 10 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Chloroform ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 ND - Not detected below-indicated limit of detection.~ ~// ~,~ f/. Analyst: PT Reviewed and Approved: Report date: This report pertains only to the samPles investigated a~d doe~' 'not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is- addressed. GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a California COrporation. ORIGINAL · An Environmental Monitodn§ and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: O5/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID ~ 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES: 8240 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION] 2600 PIERCE .ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA PAGE 2~OF 2 SAMPLE ID= T3-C-13 ANAL~S'"O~ VOLAT~L~ ~R~A~ICS'B¥'"GAS-~-dh-~A MASS SPECTROMETRY BY EPA METHOD 8240 COMPOUNDS RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (ug/kg} (ug/kg) ciS-l,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Benzene ND '5.0 trans-l,3-dichloropropene ND 5.0 Bromoform ND· 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Eth¥1benzene ND 5.0 m,p-Xylenes ND 5.0 o-X¥1ene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene -ND 5.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. ~//~// Analyst:PT Reviewed and Approved:. , Report date: This report pertains only to the samples 'i'nvestiga~'ed and' does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the 'exclusive use~ of the client to whom it is addressed. .. · · GEOTEST is a division, of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation, n~,~_, ~, ^,_ An EnvirOnmental Monitoring -, and Te~ting Service' '. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS EPA METHOD 8240 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED:05/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIX,SOIL COMPOUND METHOD BLANK DETECTION LIHIT CONCENTRATION (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Chloromethane ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Vinyl chloride ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 Trichlor0fluoromethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Methylene chloride O.14 10 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Chloroform 0.27 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane O.14 5.0 carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Checked and Approved.. ,/~'~ /~///~/~/~/~ Report Date: ~/?/~ · ' GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. F'~D I~_II%1 ~ l An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE. ORGANICS BY GC/MS EPA METHOD 8240 · - GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH. GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED~O5/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIX~SOIL COMPOUND METHOD BLANK DETECTION LIMIT CONCENTRATION (ug/kg) (ug/kg) CiS-l,'3'~Dich'l'orOpropene O.12 5'"~O Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.04 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 Benzene ND 5.0 trans-l,3-dichloropropene ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 Toluene 0.04 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Eth¥1benzene .0.06. 5.0 m,p-X¥1enes ND 5.0 o-X¥1ene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 Methylethylketone /~ ~ N~/ / / 5.0 Checked and Approved: .Y~~-~Y Report Date, //~///~V GEOTEST is a division, of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation, r~p ~_, ~, ~, GEOTEST Post Office Box g0911, LongBeach, Californiag0809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmenta~ Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY'ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS EPA METHOD 8240 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED:O5/29/92 SAMPLE MATRIX:SOIL % ACCURACY Chloromethane 90 Vinyl chloride 72 1,1-Dichloroethene 93 1,1-Dichloroethane 89 Chloroform 88 1,2-Dichloropropane 84 Bromoform 87 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 95 Toluene 93 Chlorobenzene 89 Eth¥1benzene 83 Checked and Approved: /.///~/~~// Report Date: ~/~/~V GEOTEST is a division ofGEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. ORIGINAl GEOTEST An Environmental Mon!toring Post Office Box 90911, Long E~.ach, California 90~9-0911 (310) 498-9515 ($00)624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE.SAMPLED , O5/18/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE. 113 DATE~ RECEIVED, 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.,. 92400-17 ANALYSES, TPH-G PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION, 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY CAL/DOHS TPH FOR GASOLINE SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) SS22-8 ND 1.O SS23-8 ND 1.O SS24-8 ND .1.O SS25-8 ND 1.0 SS26-8 ND 1.O SS27-6 ND 1.O SS28-4 ND 1.0 SS29-4 22 COMPOSITE (SP-1. SP-2. SP-3) 49 1.O COMPOSITE (SP-4. SP-5o SP-6) ND 1.O ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, G~ Reviewed and Approved, Report date, This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. 'GEOTEST ~o= office Box 90911. Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744' An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS'. EPA METHOD 8240 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO~ 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED,05/29/92 ~US~LEMATRIX~ COMPOUND MATRIX SPIKE MATRIX SPIKE % RECOVERY DUPLICATE % REPRODUCIBILITY 1,1-Dichloroethene 64 103 Trichloroethene 90 99 Benzene 65 101. Toluene 78 106 Chlorobenzene 81 98 Checked and Approved: Report Date: GEO TEST is a division of GEOSERVICES a California corporation, r~ ~c~ ~,, ~ GEOTEST Post Office Box g0911, LongBeach, Californiag080g-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Uonitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GBORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , O5/18/92 1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: O5/21/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES, 418.1 PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 418.1 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg} SS13-9 ND 10 SS14-9 ND 10 SS15-9 450 10 SS16-9 20 10 SS17-7 ND 10 SP-11 310 10 COMPOSITE (SP-12. SP-13) 320 10 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst': HG.. -.Reviewed andReportApproved:date:~~~~v ~- This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does nbt necessarily apply to other apparently identical or-similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a divisiOn of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. " GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 ' (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ~EPA METHOD 418.1 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED: O5/21/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL' ELAP certification #1225 Analyses method: 418.1 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mu/kg) (mu/kg} METHOD BLANK ND 10 % '~~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 99 70 - 130% % ACC~PT~BL~ R'A~'GE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 101 70 - 130% % AccEPTABLE RAhGE REPRODUCIBILITY % · MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 100 70 - 130% Checked and Approved: ~ ~ Report Date: ~'/~7 /~ GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation.. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post 'Office Box '90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service AMENDED LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED, O5/15/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES, 418.1 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS Off H~DROCARBON CONTENT BY INffRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 418.1 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) T3-C-9 ND 10 T3-C-13 ND 10 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection, Analyst: DR Reviewed and Approved, Report date, / This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, LongBeach, Califomia90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS EPA METHOD 418.1 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME~ GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED: 05/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX= SOIL ELAP certification #1623 Analyses method: 418.1 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 10 ' "% ~--d~~~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 97 70 - 130% % ACC'~'PTAB~ RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 95 70 - 130% % ACC'EPTABLE R~GE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 100 70 - 130% Checked and Approved: ./~./ ~' ~ Report Date: ~/~ ~ GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a C. alifomia corporation: GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911. LongBeach. Califomia90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800):624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS EPA METHOD 418.1 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED: 05/22/92 SAMPLE'MATRIX: SOIL ELAP certification #1612 Analyses method: 418.1 · CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 10 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 101 70 - 130% % RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 101 70 - 130% % A~'~'~'PTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 100 70 - 130% Checked and Approved: ./~/ / ~~ Report Date: ~ GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. GEOTEST ~o~ Office Boxg0911, Long Beach, California g080g-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATB SAMPLED , O5/15/92 1713 TULARE STREET· SUITE 113' DATE RECEIVED, O5/15/92 FRESNO CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/15/92 · 05/18/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID ~ 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 924OO-17 ANALYSES~ TPH-G PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATIONs 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY CAL/DOHS'TPH FOR GASOLINE SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) SS6-18 ND 1.O T1-S-14 ND 1.0 T1-S-18 ND 1.O T2-S-14 ND 1.O T2-S-18 ND 1.0 SS7-14 ND 1.O SS8-18 ND 1.0 SS9-14 ND 1.0 SS10-14 ND 1.0 SSl1-14 ND 1.O SS12-14 ND 1.O ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. ~///~~ Analyst: AM, GW Reviewed and Approved, Report date, ~ - ~/~/~ ' This report pertains only to the samples investigated and doe's not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEosERVICES, a California corporation. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ~ GASOLINE GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1623 " GEOTEST. PROJECT NO, 92400-17 Analyses prep method,5030 *~ GEOTEST PROJECT.NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method~DHS TPH-G DATE ANALYZED,O5/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX,SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg} (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 1.0 ACCURACY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 110 70 - 130 RECOVERY ACCEPT~B'~E RANGE % % MATRIX SPIKE 115 70 - 130 REPRODUCIBILITY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 98 70 - 130 · GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES. a California corporation. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 924OO-17 Analyses prep method:5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method,DHS TPH-G DATE ANALYZED: O5/18/92 SAMPLE MATRIX.. SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 1.O ACCURACY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 92 70 - 130 RECOVERY AccEpTABLE RANGE "' % % MATRIX SPIKE 94 70 - 130 REPRODUCIBILITY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 97 70 - 130 Checked and Approved: '/~ ..... Report Date, GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Calif°mia corP°.rat!°.n. ORIGINAL GEOTEST ~o~ office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service · LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , 05115/92 1713 TULARE STREET'. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED~ O5/15/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZBDs 05/15192 05/18/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.~ 92400-17 ANALYSES, BTEX PROJECT NAMEs UNOCAL #3655 LOCATIONs 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AROMATICS EPA METHOD 8020 COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ~ (mg/kg} (mg/kg) DETECTION LIMITS 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 SAMPLE ID $$6-18 ND ND ND ND T1-S-1¢ ND ND ND ND T1-S-18 ND ND ND ND T2-S-14 ND ND ND ND T2-S-18 ND ND ND ND SS7-14 ND ND ND ND SS8-18 ND ND ND ND SS9-14 ND ND ND ND SS10-14 ND ND ND ND SSl1-14 ND ND ND ND' SS12-14 ND ND ND ND ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. ~/ ~~ Analyst~ AM, GW Reviewed and Approved: Report date: ' This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. G£Or£S/is a division of GFOSERVICSS. a California comOmtion. GEOTEST ~o~ Office Box90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498;9515 (800)62*5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH 'ELAP Certification #1623 GEOTEST PROJECT NO= 924OO-17 Analyses prep method,5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method:8020 DATE ANALYZED: 05/15/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total Xylenes ND O.O15 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 104. 70-130% Toluene 100 70-130% Ethylbenzene 89 70-130% Total Xylenes , 103 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE Benzene 105 70-130% Toluene ' 105 70-130% Ethylbenzene 104 70-130% Total Xylenes 104 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 95 70-130% Toluene 96 70-130%. Ethylbenzene 97 70-130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: GEOTEST is a division of ~3EOSERVICES, a California corporation. . GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 92400-17 Analyses prep method:5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method:8020 DATE ANALYZED: 05/18/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total Xylenes .................................................................. ND O.O15 .............................. ~ ............................................................... K~'~'~'~'~'K~'~'~'"'"'~'K~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 89 70-130% Toluene' 87 70-130% Ethylbenzene 87 70-130% Total Xylenes 86 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY % Benzene 105 70-130% Toluene 104 70-130% Ethylbenzene 102 70-130% Total Xylenes 102 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 97 70-130% Toluene 97 70-130% Eth¥1benzene 97 70-130% Total Xylenes ~~_~r~.~/~~/ 97 70--130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: ~/~ GEO TEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corpo, ration. __m m ~ mm GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-O911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAHPLED , 05/18/92 '1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED, 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE HATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 92400-17 ,. ANALYSES= BTEX PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION, 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA AJgALY~X~ ~'0~GAM~CARO~TiC~ EPA HETHOD 8020 COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES (ag/kg) (ag/kg} (ag/kg} (ag/kg) DETECTION LIMITS 0,005 0.015 0.005 0.015 SAMPLE ID SS22-8 ND ND' ND 'ND SS23-8 ND ND ND ND SS24-8 ND ND ND ND SS25-8' ND ND ND ND SS26-8 ND ND ND ND SS27-6 ND ND ND ND SS28-4 ND ND ND ND SS29-4 ND ND 0.008 0.024 COMPOSITE(SP-1, SP-2. SP-3) ND 0.058 0.046 2.7 COMPOSITE(SP-4 SP-5. SP-6) ND ND ND ND ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, GW Reviewed and Approved, Report date,' necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom'it is addressed.' GEOTESTisadivisionofGEOSERVICES, a Califomia.c°rpo~tion. ~,~ ..... GEOTEST ~o~ office Boxg0911, Long Beach, California 90809-091'1 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GBORESBARCH DATE SAMPLBD 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 -' ANALYSES, TPH-G PROJECT NAHE= UNOCAL'#3655 LOCATION: 2600~PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROHATOGRAPHY CAL/DOHS TPH FOR GASOLINE 'SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIHIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) SP-7 ND 1.0 COMPOSITE (SP-8. SP-9) 'ND 1.0 SP-10 ND 1..0 SP-11 ND 1.0 COMPOSITE (SP-12, SP-13} ND 1.O COMPOSITE (SP-14, SP-15) ND 1'.0 COMPOSITE (SP-16,'SP-17) ND 1.0 COMPOSITE (SP-18, SP-19) 3.1 1.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, GW Reviewed and ApproVed: Report date, This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it .is addressed. GEOTEST is a division Of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. GEOTEST Post Office BOx 90911,' Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) ~198-9515 (800) 624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE GEOTEST CLIENT NAHE~ GEORESEARCH ELAP'Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 92400-17 Analyses prep method~5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAMEs UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method~DHS TPH-G DATE ANALYZED~05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX:SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 1.0 ACCURACY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 96 70 - 130 RECOVERY A'CCE'~'~'~LE RANGE ........ MATRIX SPIKE 86 70 - 130 REPRODUCIBILITY ACCEPTABLE RANGE ~ % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 108 70 - 130 Checked and Approved: _,~,,~~ - Report Date: ~/Z,7 /?~Z~ .. GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90~09-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and .Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , 05/18/92 1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED~ 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 92400-17 ANALYSES, BTEX PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION, 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA EPA-METHOD 8e2e COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES (mg/kg) '(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg} DETECTION LIMITS 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.015 SAMPLE ID SP-7 ND ND ND ND COMPOSITE (SP-8, SP-9) ND ND ND ND SP-10 ND ND ND ND SP-11 ND ND ND ND COMPOSITE (SP-12. SP-13) ND ND ND ND COMPOSITE (SP-14. SP-15) ND ND ND ND COMPOSITE (SP-16. SP-17) ND ND ND ND COMPOSITE (SP-18. SP-19) ND ND ND ND ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, GW Reviewed and ApproVed: Report date, This .report pertains .only· to the samples investigated and does-not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar .materials. This report.is submitted ifor. the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed.GEoTESTisa, divisionofGEOSERViCES, aCalifomiacorpomtion. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Be~ch, California 90~09-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 62~5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 924OO-17 Analyses prep method,5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method,8020 DATE ANALYZED, 05/22/92 SAMPLE MATRIX~ SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mu/kg} (mu/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total X¥1enes ND 0.015 ~ ~~~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 93 70-130% Toluene 108 70-130% Ethylbenzene 85 70-130% Total Xylenes 88 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE Benzene 96 70-130% Toluene 96 70-130% Ethylbenzene 93 70-130% Total Xylenes 92 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 110 70-130% Toluene 106 70-130% Ethylbenzene 104 70-130% . Total Xylenes 104 · 70-130% Checked and Approved=· Report Date: ~/~7/~- GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. GEOTEST · ~ Environmental Monitoring ~ Office Box 90911,-~ng Beach, Cali~rnia 90809-0911 (310) 49~9515 (800) 62~57~. and ~sting ~ce LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/18/92 1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 11.3 DATE RECEIVED: 05/20/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 05/26/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES= 7420 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) COMPOSITE (SP-1, SP-2, SP-3) 41 520 COMPOSITE (SP-4. SP-5, SP-6) 60 5.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. AnalYst, SJ Reviewed'and Approved= Report date= ~'his report pertains only to the samples investigated. ahd does not necessarily apply to-other apparently ,identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of'the client to whom it is addressed. · ' . -' GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, 'a California corporation. GEOTEST ~o= office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 908090911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-$744 An Environmental Uonitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME.. GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME.. UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED.. 05/26/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 5.0 " % ~GE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 99 70 - 130% RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 93 70- 130% % AC~'E'~'~BLE R~'GE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 100 70 -130% Checked and Approved: Report Date.. ,.~ GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 05/20/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ADDITIONAL ANALYSES REQUESTED: '06/09/92 DATE ANALYZED: O6/11/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: STLC EXTRACT ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES: SOLUBLE LEAD PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #5855 SAMPLE ID: COMPOSITE 2600 PIERCE ROAD SP-4, SP-5 BAKERSFIELD, CA SP-6 ANALYSIS OF STLC EXTRACT FOR LEAD METALS RESULTS DETECTION LIMITS (mg/L) (mg/L} Lead ND 0.020 ND - Not detected. ~/_/~/./ Analyst: SC Reviewed and Approved: Report date: This report pertains on"ly to th'% samples i~%e'stiga~ed'an--~-~-d--~d~ not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or simil'ar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Te.sting Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF STLC EXTRACT FOR LEAD GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO~ 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED~06/ll/92 SAMPLE MATRIX:STCL EXTRACT Elements MATRIX SPIKE MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY DUPLICATE REPRODUCIBILITY % % Lead 87 1OO Report Date.. ~ GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation, r~ ~,~_,,, ~ GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, LongBeach. Califomia90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF STLC EXTRACT FOR LEAD GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED~06/11/92 SAMPLE MATRIX:STLC EXTRACT Elements METHOD.BLANK DETECTION LIMIT (mg/L) (mg/L) Lead ND 0.020 _//· Checked and Approved= Report Date: ~//~/~ - GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a C, alifomiacorporation. ,-,~ ....... GEOTEST ~o~ office Box g0911, Long Beach, California g080g-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF STLC EXTRACT FOR LEAD GEOTEST CLIENT NAME.' GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO.' 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL'#3655 DATE ANALYZED=U6/11/92 SAMPLE MATRIX=STLC EXTRACT Elements LCS ACCURACY % Lead 96 / / GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation.. OF~IGINAI_' ~ J GEOTEST Post Office Box gO911, LongBeach, CalifornJagO~09-0911 '(3~0) 498-95'5 (800) 624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/29/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 06/02/92 FRESNO CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: O6/~2/92 ' SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 924OO-17 ANALYSES: TPH-G PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY CAL/DOHS TPH FOR GASOLINE SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (~mg/kg) TP-1 ND 1.O SP-A ND 1.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst: DR Reviewed and Approved: Report date:' T-~-~"~ .... ~'~'6-~'~'""~~ only to the samples lnvestlgate~ and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. I GEoT~EST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. '. ©~ ~mln,~ . GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, LOngBeach, Californiag0809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASsuRANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUHHARY ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHRO}4ATOGRAPHY TOTAL PETROLEUH HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH EL~P Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 924OO-17 Analyses prep method:5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAHE: UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method:DHS TPH-G DATE ANALYZED:O6/O2/92 SAHPLE HATRIX:SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) HETHOD BLANK ND 1.O ACCURACY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 1~4 70 - i30 HATRIX SPIKE 100 70 - 130 REPRODUCIBILITY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % % }-{ATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 1OO 70 - 130 GEOTEST isa division of GEOSERVICES, a C, alifomia corporation. 0RIGI NAL GEOTEST ~o~ office Box gog11. Long Beach. California gOSOg-Ogll (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/29/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 06/02/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 06/02/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES: BTEX PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AROMATICS EPA METHOD 8020 COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg). (mg/kg) DETECTION LIMITS 0.005 0.005 0.005 O.O15 SAMPLE ID TP-1 ND ND ND ND SP-A ND ND 'ND ND ND - Not detected.below indicated limit of detection. ~~ /~/ ~~ · p . This report pertains only to the samples investigated, and does not necessarily apply to other apparently .identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it 'is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporatiOn. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-O911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH ELAP Certification #1225 GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 9240Q-17 Analyses prep method:5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method:8020 DATE ANALYZED: 06/02/92 SAHPLE HATRIX: SOIL I.{ETHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIHIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total Xylenes ND 0.015 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 1~8 70-130% Toluene 1~8 70-130% Ethylbenzene 109 70-130% Total Xylenes 110 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % HATRIX SPIKE Benzene 77 70-130% Toluene 88 70-130% Ethylbenzene 91 70-130% Total Xvlenes 90 70-13~% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % HATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 100 70-130% Toluene lQ1 70-130% Ethylbenzene 99 . 70-130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: GEO TEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporat!on, c~ptc~ ~.', ,~ GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911. LongBeach, California9080cj-0911 (310)498-9515 (800) 624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/29/92 1713 TULARE sTREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 06/02/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 06/08/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES: 418.1 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 418.1 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) TP-1 ND 10 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection.////~./~/ Analyst: SJ Reviewed and ApProved: Report date: ~s report pertains only to the sa~p~ lnvestlgate~ ~n--d--~oes not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the e~lusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. '" GEOTESTis a division of GEOSE.RVICES, a California corporation, n~f~_,~, ~, GEOTEST Post Office Box g0911, LongBeach, Californiag0809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800) 624-5744 An Environmental Ivionitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS EPA METHOD 418.1 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED: 06/08/92 SAHPLE MATRIX: SOIL ELAP certification #1225 Analyses method: 418.1 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 10 ACCURACY %. LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 104 70 - 130% RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 104 70 - 130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 100 70 - 130% Checked and Approved Report Date: · ' GEOTESTis a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corPo, ration.- '.' ' r~p,cl~A GEOTEST Post office BOX 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and 'Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED : 05/29/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 · DATE RECEIVED: 06/02/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED: 06/08/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92400-17 ANALYSES: 7420 PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) TP-1 ND ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection..~///~/./~ Analyst: SC Reviewed and Approved: Report date: ~-~is report pertains %-h~y to t-~-~ samples'"'--i~'~i~q-d-""~an--d'--~'~--~ necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials'. This .report is. submitted for the exclusive use of' the client to whom it is addressed. GEO TEST is a division of G EOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. GEOTEST ~o~ office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITy CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF LEAD BY EPA METHOD 7420 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME: GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO: 924OO-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 DATE ANALYZED: 06/08/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 10 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 96 70 - 130% RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 92 70 - 130% REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 99 70 - 130% Checked and Approved: Report Date: GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation, r~p~,~, ~, GiEOTESTPost Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) An Environmental Monitoring and Testing ,~rvice : '* JUL 1 9 IW2 L A B.o ~ A T 0 ~ ¥ R E P 0 a T PROJECT# ............................................................................................................ ~ ............................................................................................................................................................. GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED :"?"+~'' ' (~7'fOl/92 1'713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED: 0-1/01192 ;FRESNO, CA 93'721 DATE ANALYZED: O7/01/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID : 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO. : 924OO-17 ANALYSES: 418. 1 PROJECT NAHE: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION: 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 418. SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mE/kg) HO1-9 ' ND 10 WO2-6 ' ND 10 WO3-9 ' ND 10 WO4-6 ' ND · 10 LF. 1- 5 ' ND 10 LF 1W-5 ' 25 , 10 LF2-6 O 470 .<,I_0 LF2E-6 ND i0 ':' LF2W-6 ND LF3E-6 ND 10 LF3W-6 ND ,10 LF3-6 ND 10 LF4 -6 ND 10 ND- ~0~ .et.crc' ~elow ±n.l.ated iimlt Analyst: DR Reviewed and Approved: Report date:.' Thi-~ report pertains only to the samples ln~esulg~ted an~ ~oe~ not -necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted ~or the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH . DATE SAMPLED ~ 05/14/92 1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED, 05/14/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, 05/14/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION, WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID ~ 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 92400-17 ANALYSES, TPH-G PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION, 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF HI'DROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY '"' CAL/DOHS TPH FOR GASOLINE SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) PL1-6 1.0 1.0 PL2-6 8.0 ~ 1.O PL3- 6 ND 1. O PLd-6 23 1.0 PLS-6 ND 1.0 PL4-9 ND 1.0 PL1-8 ND 1.0 PL2-7 ND 1.0 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. ~/~...--..- Analyst, AM RevleWed and Approved, /.~~. Report date, .~-~'l~f~.-z..-- This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is. addressed. GEOTESTis a division of .GEOSERVICES, a California corpOration. GEOTEST ~o~ office Box gog11. Long Beach,- California g080g-0911 (310)498-9515 (800)624-$744 An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH ELAP certification %1623 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 Analyses prep method85030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method~DHS TPH-G DATE ANALYZED,OS/14/92 SAMPLE MATRIX,SOIL CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mu/kg) (mu/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 1.0 ACCURACY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 107 70 - 130 RECOVERY ACCEPTABLE'R'~NGE % % MATRIX SPIKE 111 70 - 130 REPRODUCIBILITY ACCEPTABLE RANGE % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 99 70 -.130 checked and Approved, Report Date-. 'GEOTEST is a divisiOn of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation; GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring POSt Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY REPORT GEORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED , 05/14/92 1713 TULARE STREET, SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED, 05/14/92 FRESNO, CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED, '05/14/92 SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL ATTENTION: WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID , 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO., 92400-17 ANALYSES, BTEX PROJECT NAME: UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION, 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AROHATICS EPA METHOD 8020 COMPONENTS BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE TOTAL XYLENES (mE/kg) (mu/kg) (mg/kg) (mE/kg) DETECTION LIMITS 0.005 0.O15 0.005 0.O15 SAMPLE ID PL1-6 0.033 O.15 0.020 O.14 PL2-6 0.006 0.054 0.022 0.40 PL3-6 ND ND ND ND PLd-6 ND ND ND 0.31 PL5-6 ND ND ND ND PLd-9 ND ND ND ND PL1-8 ND ND ND ND PL2-7 ND ND ND 0.025 ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst, AM Reviewed and Approved, Report dates This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not. necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for-the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Califomia corporation. GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 908090911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF BTEX BY GC/PID GEOTEST CLIENT NAME= GEORESEARCM ELAP Certification #1623 GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 Analyses prep method,5030 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 Analyses method,8020 DATE ANALYZED= O5/14/92 .SAMPLE MATRIX, SOIL METHOD BLANK CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Benzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Total Xylenes ND 0.O15 ~ Kt~'EPTAB~E~RANGE ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD Benzene 106 70-130% Toluene 101 70-130% Ethylbenzene 89 70-130% Total Xylenes 101 70-130% % ACCEPTABLE RANGE RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE Benzene 97 70-130% Toluene 97 70-130% Ethylbenzene 98 70-130% Total Xylenes 98 70-130% ~ ACCEPTABLE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE Benzene 101 70-130% Toluene 101 70-130% Ethylbenzene 101 70-130% Total. XYlenes 1OO 70-130% Checked and Approved: Report Dates GEOTESTis a divi~°n of GEOSERVICES, a Calif°mia corporation._ ORIRINAt GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service LABORATORY RNPORT GBORESEARCH DATE SAMPLED = O5/14/92 1713 TULARE STREET. SUITE 113 DATE RECEIVED= 05/14/92 FRESNO. CA 93721 DATE ANALYZED~ 05/14/92 SAMPLE MATRIX= SOIL ATTENTION= WARREN GROSS CLIENT ID = 92080 GEOTEST PROJECT NO.= 92400-17 ANALYSES= 418.1 PROJECT NAME= UNOCAL #3655 LOCATION= 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD. CA ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA METHOD 418.1 SAMPLE ID RESULTS DBTECTION LIMIT (mu/kg) (mu/kg) ' H1-C-9 230 10 H2~C-9'*~ ND 10 H2-S-9> ND 10 H2-W-9 ND 10 H2-E-9~ ND 10 H2-N-9 ~' ND 10 HI-N-il ~ 38 10 HI-S-il ~ ND 10 H1-E-11- ND 10 HI-W-ii-, ND 10 H1-C-11 ND 10 H1-N2-11 ND 10 -ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection. Analyst= AM Reviewed and Approved=' Report date= ~his report pertains only to the samples investigag'ed and does nog necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. · GEOTEST isa division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. - r~D,~,~, ^, GEOTEST An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach. California 90809-0911 (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 and Testing Service QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS EPA METHOD 418.1 GEOTEST CLIENT NAME, GEORESEARCH GEOTEST PROJECT NO, 92400-17 GEOTEST PROJECT NAME, UNOCAL #3655 DATE'ANALYZED: O5/14/92 SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL ELAP certification #1623 Analyses method: 418.1 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (mg/kg} (mg/kg) METHOD BLANK ND 10 ACCURACY % LABORATORY CONTROL STANDARD 95 70 - 130% RECOVERY % MATRIX SPIKE 95 70 - 130% % ACCE~'T'A~LE RANGE REPRODUCIBILITY % MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE 1OO 70 - 130% Checked and Approved.- Report Date: GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a Calif.ornia'corporation. GEOTEST · 3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST ,Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJECT I~:): . ~ ' Telephone: (310)498-9515 (800)624-S744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE PROJECTNAME~~ ' - ~ v V METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING ADDRESS SAMPLER'S SIG~TURE . , ~ PRINTED:NAME ~ ~ ~ z z CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ ~- ~ ~' O< ~w x' ~ ~ x~ --~ oO ~ROJECT:MANAGER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ~ ~ ~.REUNQUI~ED BY ~ ' ,DATE RELINQUISHED BY DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY SAMPLEOONDITIONS~ · PRINTE~ N~E' - ' TI~E PRINTED NAME TIME PRINTED NAME ~ TIME PR~NT~ NA~ ' TIME TIME PRIN D~' - / GEOTEST . . 3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST ,~ Lon Beaoh. C,,.90m P,O, ECT O;. -- / ~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE ,,.~//¢'/5;"'~ PAGE ~ OF PROJECT NAME ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING ..... ~ J v v' ADDRESS 'SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE :PRINTED NAME ~ CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ O ~O ,PROJECT MANAGER ~orc~ ~ SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION - S - i ~ /coo ' I RELINQUISHED BY RELINQUISHED BY SAMPLE CONDITIONS-~/~_~ I REcEIvED ON ICE RE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL PRINTED NAME ,. PRINTED NAME PROJECT COMMENTS coMPANY COMPANY ~9~ I. OC~~ RECEIVED BY RECEIVED BY ~ C~~S~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~o o~c~.' PRINTED NAME COMPANY COMPANY 'i, 3960 ,Gilman Street GEOTEST '" · ' Long Beach. CA. 90815 PROJECT, NO' ~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE PROJECT. NAME~ (~, . ' ¢ v' METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING ADDRESS~L/ -- ~. . . . 'SAMPLER'S SIGNATUR _ _ · ." . _Z~J ~, LUz ,'PRINTED NAME ~ ~ __ ' ~. ~ '"~ LU O) (/) Z Z CLIENT PROJECT NO. .< u~ m x -- O PROJECT MANAGER ~, ,~. t~--/~ C3--1R O.5',,~ (.o c3 x ~ LU Z IJ.. -- ~-= = '" ~ ~o~ .~. .~ o o SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION DATE , ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS, . (D~6 }~ PROJECT COMMENTS ~~%'DATE ~ RECEIVED BY DATE SIC~ATURE---- '--~ (~ SIGNATURE SIGNATOR~ · I /~:: ' i GEOTESTi · !3960 G Iman Street t Long Beach:'CA. 90815 PROJECT'NO:-, ' ~ ~ TelephOne: (3.10) 498-95i'5 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN~OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE. ' ' ~ ~ SPECIAL HANDLING PROJECT NAME ~(A~ ~ / METHODS ADDRESS __ . Z SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ~ z " . -- PRINTED NAME ~¢~'o ~ ~ z z CLIENT PROJECTNO. ,~ / ~.. < ~ ~ ~ x~ ~ cO PROJECT MANAGER ,, _ SAMPLE NO, DATE TIME LOCATION ..... : SAMPLE CONDITIONS ~'RELINQUISHED [Yi DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE la .~u,a,lS.~ ., ~TE RECEIVED ON ,CE ~O PRINT~ ~AME ~ TIME . ' , .¢~/)~ G~. ~¢q PROJECT COMMENTS COMPANY OOMPA" W ~'J~ ' , ""INTE'O NAME TI.E PRiNT~.~M[ I I TI"E ~ A ~~¢.~[I TIME G'OMPANY/ J COMPANY 13960 Gitman Street GEOTEST .Long Beach, CA. 90815 "-~'="~ . . PROJECTJ',i.O;., · ~ · Telephone:(310) 498-9515 (S00) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODYRECORD DATE ...'.'-~//~/? 7-. PAGE ~OF ~ '~ PROJECT NAME ~t~) ADDRESS ~00 P/~ .~1 ~~l~t~ ~ ~ ~ METHODS' SPECIAL HANDLING sAMPLER'S SIGNATURE PR~NTE~ NAME .... ~ ~'~ CLIENT PROJECT NO. PROJECT MANAGER .... SAMPLE NO. I ~~ATE TIME~h ~LOCATION REU.aU~SHED BY REL,.aU,SHED BY' .E.,.aU,S.ED SIGNATURE ~~ RECEIVED ON ICE ~0 ~ :~ SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL ~ ~D NAME 'IME PRINTED NAME ~ PROJECT COMMENTS .: ] '~00 I COMPAN~ SIGNATURE ..~.. ,' GEOTEST · * 3960 G~ S~reet lcm~g ee~Ch. CA. gOSlS GEOTEST · ~ . Te,~e: pi0) 498-9515 ~) s=~rr~ CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD PROJECT ND: ADDRESS ~~4~OC~'Jr'' m~.z~ , I, IETHODS SPECIAL HANDLING SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE . . ' . _ '~~__ CLIENT PROJECT NO. c~,..~ 0 ~ PROJECT MANAGER {'J. Jj~-~j~d ~c,P-..~)_'~-z~' O ~, x - a: - . ,, ,_ SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ..... ' ~ - ~ , , ~_~ ./~,~ .... . / ~. /~ /~/~ ~ ,, ~ ,,.)- ~ ~~ . .. ~ '~ .~ ~'C~S ~ ' .~.,~,~~. ~,~,~'~ ........... ~ ..~~~~~ ,.~:.--- ' ........ ~ ~ ~.,~~~'~:'"" GEOTEST 3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJECT NO:, ~-' .7~'T' . ' Telephone:(310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-C'USTODYRECORD DATE' ~z~////<~/~_. PAGE ~ OF ~' ' ' PROJECT NAME ..... ~¢~ ~ v v ~ METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING ' ADDRESS ~ ~0 SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME. CLIENT PROJECT NO. PROJECT MANAGER SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION RELINQUISHED BY RELINQUISHED BY RELINQUISHED BY SAMPLE CONDITIONS RECEIVED ON ICE SIGNATURE · SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL~NO PRINTED NAME., PROJECT COMMENTS COMPANY COMPANY IRECEIVED BY BY SIGNATURE SIGNATURE '. PRINTED NAME '1 ""'"" .... COMPANY COMPANY ....!,.;:. ? ""' . GEOTEST , ! 3960 Gilman StreetGEOTEST ' · ~.~t Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJECTNO: ~ 'Telephone: (310)498-9515 (800)624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE PROJECT NAME ~ O METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING SAMPLER'S S GNATURE .' - - z ';P~NTED NAME ~ . · PROJECT MANAGER [~l ~&) ~ L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION COMPANY .... ' ..... COMPAN~ ' ~AUE PRINTED TIME PRINTED '~~ GEOTEST 3960 Gilman Stroe, GEOTEST ~-")~-- Y~)'~' / 7 ~. Long Beach, CA.90815 . ~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD PROJECT NO: "' ;.7'-7~- PAGE / OF / DATE - - . PROJECT NAME ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ 5~b~' ....... , ~ j v METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING SAM pLE R,S SIGNATURE ~'~;~ ...... PRINTED NAME ~~ B "14~ -- O ,,, m ~ X -- O PROJECTMANAGER__~~,,.,~o~ , ~ m ~ ~ ~ O O sAMpLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ~kRELINQUISHED BY ,, DATE S~G qATURE' ' . ~ SlGNATUR SIGNATURE .. ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL ~NO ' PRI'~TEDNAME "~ ........ -"' TIME PRINTEDN~ TIME P~TE~NAME [ ~. ~ 'TIME GEOTEST - - ~ L~g Bea~ .CA. g081S · CHAIN-OF;CUSTODY RECORD -~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 DATE PROJECT NAME ~ ~O~) ~ ~' ~ ~ METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ~ ~~ Z ~ ~' ~'~ - CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ O ~ 0 / ~ ~ ~ X - O PROJECT MANAGER ~~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ z ~ ' SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ".-'~ "' ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE S~MPLE CONOmONS~- ~ SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL Y~ SIGNATURE , (~ C ~ SIGNATURE . ' PRI~ NAME - TIME PRINTED NAME TIME PRINTED NA~ ' TIME '~' /~~A~ ' PROJECT COMMENTS · COM~ /~ ~ COMPANY COMPANY ~INTED ~M~ ' ' ' TIME PRINTED N*~ TIME PRINTEE~A~ ' _ '1- ¢ TIME COMPANY COMPANY · ' ~ GEOTEST "~' GEOTEST ' '--,-- // 3960 Gilman Street Long Beach?CA. 90815 . PROJECT NO:., _c.~,~ _~__~'% /' ~ 'Telephone:.(310)498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ,:,. DATE '3~'J'/Y,/?~ PAGE OF PROJECT NAME O/~('.~.,,i 2' ~,..~:~'" ¥ ,/ ,/ METHODS sPECIAL HANDLING ADDRESS ; (,,OO {21 ~r i~'X;~J~ ~ ( ~ l ('"-'N' nLu SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ,, z z PRINTED NAME '-~1~ ~ '~<L,-~-["~'3 m - n- O uJ uJ CLIENT PROJECT NO. 9,2,, O~O ~ ~ z z u~ X -- O PRoJECT MANAGER J,,A) ~j~¢,~'-) (..~O..,.~.~ O ~' x '"' z u. SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION 4,,/h: I ,¢o 2 ¢ t ' //l_/v-ii ,, ,.,) o~/~t;~ / - ..,vo,~+~, ~,,¢1 'U" I ffiREL'NQU '~H*D ~1 '' I DATE I RELINQUISHED BY DATE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS//'~ SIGNATURE ~ , A f~ SIGNATURE SIGNATURE t./ PRiN~____~;E ~.~r~k TI.E PRINTED NAME TI~'~E PRINTED NAME ~-'~ T'"E PROJECT COMMENTS COMPANY ]?~0 COMPANY COMPANY· SJ~N~.TURE SIGNATURE SIGClA~fJ~L~J= ,~ . [/ ?0j,o ~RIN_TED NAME TIME PRINTED ~AME %~ TIME PRIN~ED NAME, ' % TIME COMPANY !¢100 OOM~^"Y. ,oo · .~~ :GEOT~$T , 3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST (~ .... /'3 '., .Long Beach;CA. 90815 .!' ':' ~ ' Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800)624-5744.' CHAIN'OF;CUSTODYRECORD 'DATE q]4,~.~'- PAGE "'~.. OF ~'" PROJECT NAME v METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING' ADDREss ..... ' ~ ~O ~ ~ .- SAMPLER'S sIGNATURE , z PRINTED NAME CLIENT PROJECT NO. ?~ ~ ~ ~ z PROJECT MANAGER LL' A[~ ~ O ~ x ~ z SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ..,~ I DATE' ffi RELINQUISHED BY DATE' 1~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS SIG.~gS¢~ ~ ;'SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL YES/O PRIN~D NAM~ TIME PRINTED NAME TI~E PRINTED NAM~ TI~E ~~~¢ ~ .- .... PROJECT CO~ENTS COM.*.Y ~~ vv ' -- ~ ~ SIGNATURE SIGNA~0~ ' - _ [ ~ , ~iNTEO N~¢ ...... TIME VmNTEONAME TIME VRINTEO ~E -- .. ~.-% TIME GEOTEST 3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST Long Beach. CA. 90815 PROJECT NO: ~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE PROJECT NAME U/VOCA-L. 3/:,5"¢' ~,j METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE z ~J 0 u.i z z SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION - SIGNA~UR~ SlGNATU~~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL PRIN~ED NAME TIME PRINTE~4AME TIME PRINTED ~dE TIME., PROJECT COMMENTS OO~PANY OOMPANY ~ANY . PRI~T6D NA"E TIME PR'NTEDNA% ~ TIME I GEOSERUICES E~5/08,'92 12:45 GeoResearch 1 733 '[ulare, Suite 113 Fresno. Cald(.~ma 9372 i 12091 264-0444 (80(.l) 5~3-4 May 8, 1992 Mr. Joseph Ao Dunwoody Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Material Division Bakersfield City Fire Department 2130 "'G"' Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Underground storage tank removal for Unocal Service Stations located in the city of Bakersfield° Dear Mr~ Dunwoody: Inclosed is the soil sampling protocal GeoResearch utilize~ during the removal of underground storage tanks (US?s)~ We under~tand that you wish to present during the soil sampling beneath th~ UST~ gasoline dispensers, and their associated piping° If we can be of further assistance or if you should have question~ please contact our office at (209)-264-044~o Sincerely, Blair Redfearn Senior Staff Geologist enclosure GeoR~',.soarch m a division ~)f GE©SERVICES, a California GEOSERUIC:ES 05.,'08,~92 12:46 SOIL SAMPLIN~.R~OO~DDRES FOR UND~GRODND The following procedures are utilized for the collectioD of Soil samples: i. Soil samples are obtained under the direction of a professional engineer, geologist, or authorized representative of a State-approved laboratory° Sample numbers and locations are approved by the city/county inspector, if present on-site~ ii. All soil samples at tank removal sites are taken from the backhoe bucket, unless the excavation has been safely graded or shored. Soil samples will be collected from the interior portions of the excavator bucket~ away from the bucket's edges and teeth, to avoid potential cross~ contamination. Approximately one inch of soil will be removed from the surface area where the ~ample is to be collected and a clean, 6-inch 1cng, 1-inch minimum diameter brass ring will be pounded into the soil using a wooden mallet, or equivalent tool0 No headspace will be p~e~ent in the ring once the sample im collected° iii° In shallow excavations~ as in under product lines, soil samples may be taken by driving the brass tub~ directly into the trench sidewall. iv. Soil samples are collected in thin~wall~d stainless steel or brass cylinders 6" long by 1o5~" or 2'~ diame~er~ Cylinders are pounded into the ~oil with a wooden mallet or equivalent method when not using an auger or drilling equipment. Each end of the cylinder is covered with aluminum foil, capped with polyethylene lids, taped, and labeled. Vio Samples are transported in an ice chest containing blue ice or equivalent and kept at approximately 4 degrees centigrade until delivery to a California Department of Health Services-approved analytical laboratory° vii. Chain-of-custody records produced in accordance with U.S0 E~PoA~ requirements are kept to track the possession of a sample from the ~ime it is taken in t~f~ield until the time it is analyzed~ ~, .- FILE 'L'ONTEN'rs; i: Facility' , ~ . Date ~Con,scruccion Permit { Date ~Permic Co 'abandont No. o[ Tanks ' ~ **Da ~e ~ended Permit Conditions ~ · ~Permic Application Form,.. . _:~~_.__.: I Report Forms .~Copy~'o~ Written Contract Between Owner i Operator :.. ~lnspection Reports ;' ~ -- -- ..... ' Date ...... - -- ' ~Unautho~t~e4 Rel'ea.e Reports ~ ~ ~bandonmen~/Closuge Report. ' - . ~Sampling/Lab Re~rta ~ ~HVF C~Pllance Check ~STD CMpliance Check (New Construction ChecklLst) ~ . ~HVF Plan Check (Ney Construction) ~STD Plan Check (Ney ConstruCtion) . ~HVF PI'an Check (Existing Facility) ~S~ Plan Check (BXls~i · ~" lnc ...... ' aq Facility) . : ~__ ~mP*ege. AppI lca~ion- Porto ~erm~c Application Checklist ~vermlt Inltruction8 ,. ~Discarded " Da ~e "' ~N'onicorl~ Hell ConstruCtion Da~a/Permics -- ~Environmental Sens~cl'Vicy Data: .... ;- ...... ~Ground~a~er Drilling, Boring L°ca~lonoE ~aCer ~e11~ ~SCa~emenc oE Underground C0nduics ~Plot ~lan Yeacuring. A11 Environmental1~ Sensitive Da~a ~PhoCos ~ConscruC~lon Dra~lngs Location: :... ~,al~ shee~ sho~ln9 dace received and Ca~y o~ lnspe~kion time, ~Ec ~tacel laneous ' 1700 Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 ~ Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone 805)861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ..... ' ~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Relchard I NTERI M PERMi T" PERlVXI T~O,5OO~' DC IsSUED: JULY 1, 1986 EXP I RES :JULY 1, 1988 · CHUCK'S AUTO REPAIR #3655 [' UNOCAL -. ' 26b0 PIERCE ROAD : :.. ; · ". [ .. <. 12175 N CALIF BLVD,STE. 650" : ' '"' ' TANK # .' · AGE(IN YRS) -SUBSTANCE (:ODE "*PRESSURiZED'PIPING?;,'~,~-~ NOTE: ALL INTERIN REQUIRENENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERNITTING . AUTHORITY NUST BE NET DURING THE TERN OF .THIS PERNIT ',:,(i:~. NON--TRANSFERABLE *** POST ON PREMISES '. DATE PEPS-fIT CHECK LIST.RETURNED:. .-., : ..'~.: Kern :ount~ Health O~}~tment ~ ~:ml~ No. ~_~ ~iviston o= Enviro~ental Heal~-- A~lication -- 1700 Flo~r Street, Bakersfield, t 9]]05 ~PLI~TION FOR PE~X:T ~ OPE~'rE' ~E~R~D " ~~S SUBST~CES S~E FACILI~. .~ of Applicati°n (ch~k): : ~Ne~ ~acility ~ification of Facility ~isti~ Facility ~ansfer o~ ~ership A. ~ergen~ 24-~Ur Contact (n~e', area c~e, ~one):. ~,~,3~(~o[ ~4%~95~-~° · ~ of B~ine~s (check): ~~line S~tion ~e~ (de~rl~) Is Tank(s) Us~ ~i~rily for ~ricultural ~r~ses?..~Yes. ~.~ · ' Facility Addre~ Q~OO Q~~ ~ Nearest Cro~ T R SEC' (Rural ~ations ~ly) B. ~ter m Facility Provid~ by ~oT km~k~ "-. :. ' ~P~ m Gro~~r~ · ~sis for Soil ~ a~ Grp~ter ~p~ ~te~t~tto~ - C. Contractor k %/~' " ~ C6ntr'actOr' s ~e~e ~ ~ . ' Pro~s~ 'S~rt'i~ ~te Pro~s~ C~pletion Pro~ Tank ' ~ ' ~ste Pr~uct ~tor Vehicle Unlead~ R~ular Pr~i~ Die~l ~ste Fuel 0 O O D O ~. ~l~l ~siti~ o~ ~e~ials S~o~ (~t. ~ces~y .~Or. ~o~ ~icle '~ls> G. Transfer of Ownership. Dste of ~-ansfer Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept fully all obligations of permit No. __ issued''to · I understand tha{ the-Permitting Authority may review and modi'fy or terminate the transfer of the. Permit: to Operate this ~%dergro~d storage facility upon receiving this c~mpleted form. ........ This-~form- ha~ beemccmpteted -under penalty i'of '=perjury==ar~d'- to-the, best-..of my-knowledge-~s- tr'ue and Correct. ~R EA~ SE~I~, '~ECK ~ '~PROPRIATE ~XES H. 1. Tank is: ~VauI~d ~n-vault~ ~uble-Wall~ ~Si~jle~all Car~n Stol' ~ S~inless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~l~ Steel Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ ~Other (de~ri~) " 3. Priory Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~llons) ' ~nufacturer ~-- ~ :4. :'.Tank Secdndary Contai~ent ~Other (d~scri~): ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inc~s)' __ Ca.city (Gals.) 5. Tank ~nterior Lini~ ~Other (descri~): 6.' Tank Corrosion Protection · : . ' ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~: :' '' ~. Ca~ic Protection: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crfficfal ~e ~t~ 7. Leak ~tection, ~nitori~,, and Interception a. , Tank: , ~Vis~l (vault~ tanks only) ~ ~Gro~t~r ~n'i~ori~"~ll (s) .~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~ut ~ner '. ~ ,~ ~ Pressure Sen~r 'in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank ~ '' :.- ~ily Ga~i~ &. I~entory'Reconciliation ~ ~ricdic Tigh~e~ ~T.st!~ ~ U~no~ ~ ~her '- ~te 0f ~'Tightne~ Test Results of T~st~ Test ~e : ~sti~ C~ny, ~te(s) of ~lr(s) 10. ~erfill Protection ~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls ~Other: List ~ke & ~el For '~e ~ices Thickne~ (i~hes) Dieter ~. Manufacturer ~essure ~i%n ~Gravity ~roxi~te ~ ~b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosion Prot~ti~.:. - ~lye~yle~ wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~:lt ~U~o~ ~one ~her (de~ri~): c. U~ergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Con~l~nt: ~Other (de~ri~): TANK ~___~-_r~--~' (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM .FOR .i TANK) ~,~.~ ~_~5~' --FDR EACR SECTION, 'CHECK ALL :APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaul't~d ~Non-Vaulted l-]Double-Wall ~Sir~31e-Wall 2. ~ Mater ia'l ,.. --~Carbon Steel ~ S~inless Steel ~ ~l~inyl C~oridu ~ Ei~rg'lass~l~ S~eel ~' ~: 'Fi~rgtass-Reinforc~ Plastic '~Concrete ~ ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ ~Other (de~ri~) 3. Priory Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) .Ca,city (~llons) ~nufacturer : ~.' Tank S~c5~ Contai~ent : . : ' ' .... ~' "~le-~ll ~thetic Liner ~in~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ~ _~Other (descri~): Manufacturer: ' .. ' .~terial Thic~ess (Inc~s)' Ca,city (~ls.) 5. Tank rnterior Lini~ . " ~.Other ('de~ri~): ~ : 6:. Tank CorroSion Protection Ca~t¢ Protection: ~ne..~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crffl~ial ~e ~t~ ;~ri~ Syst~ & Equi~ent: 7. Leak ~tection,-~nitori~, and Interception a. Tan~: ~Vis~l (vault~ tanks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~ .~ll(s) ~Vadose Zone ~ni.tgri~ ~ll(s). ~q~ Wi~ut : · ' ~,Pressure Se~r iin'~ular S~ of ~uble Wall }ank ' ~ly Ga~i~ &..I~entory Reconciliation ~riedic Tigh~e~ Testi~ ' ~'None ~:~o~ ~ ~'~er ': ' ' b. PtPf~:': ~ El~Res~rtCti~ ~ak-- ~tect~(s) for Pressurize. :. : ~.~nttori~ ~p .wtth.~ce~y, ~al~ C~erete ~ce~y ~s '~n~$ 'la~ ~en Tigh~ess[ ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ . ~ ~t9 of ~ Ti~tne~ Test - . : .' : 'Results of T&st Test ~e· ~sti~ C~ny' 9.' Tank Re~i~ ~te.(s) of '~ir (s) 10. ~e~fill Protection .~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel .~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~ Auto shut- Off Controls ~~itance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other:" List ~ke & ~el For ~e ~ices a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~o~ ~terial ~ : : Thickne~ (i~hes) Dieter ~, Manufacturer : -~ ssure ~tion ~Gravity ~proxi~te ~ of Pi~ b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ CorFosiOn Prot~ti~ : '~Pol'ye~y. le~ wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~vinYl Wrap ~Tar or ~U~o~ ~one ~her (de~ri~): c. ~ergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Con~i~nt: ~Other (de~ri~): TANK ~5._~_~_~_-[(FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM _d TANK) E~R ETk-~H SECTION, :'CHECK Ar.l. 'APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [-] Va ul t'~d [~Non-vaul ted l-]Double-Wall [~Sir~31e-Wal 1 2. ~ Mater .~.Carbon Steel I-]Stainless Steel D Polyvinyl Chloride l-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel ~ Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] A/~in~l' [] Bronze []Unknown · [-1 Other (describe) 3. Primary Conta ina~nt- : Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons! Manufacturer : 4. :Tank Secondary Containment 1'TDouble-Wall [] Synthetic Liner []l~ined Vault [~NOm: I'iUnknown ~. []Other (describe): , Manufacturer: •~terial Thickness (In¢l~s) ' Capacity '5. 'Tank ~nteriof Lining. " [~[~ubber 'U~kyd U.EPOxy Umenolie •~lass-•Clay: ~in~' Uu. kn°~ · •Other (describe): '- 6. ' Tank Corrosion ~rotection -. : . •Tar or Aspl~lt I-iUnknown _~Nor~ •Other {describe)~- Cathodic Protection: ~None :[-ilmpressed Current System :['1Sacrificial :~ode Systm.. ~ribe System i Equipment: .. ' " 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring., and Interception a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) I-]Groundwater' Monitoring' Wmll(is) []Vadose Zone Monitgring Well(s) [-]U~Tube Without Liner DU-Tube'With ComPatible Liner Directing Flow to M~nitoring : '- [] Vapor Detector* ]-I Liquid Level Sensor* .1-1Conductivit~ Sensor' '. : [] Pressure Sensor!'in Annular Space of Double Wall glnk " '. : [] Liquid Retrieval. &' Inspection From U~Tube, Mdnitd~ing Well 'or Annular Space []Daily Gauging &:Inventory Reconciliation I-Ipericdic Tightness Testing b. Piping:' Flc~-Res_~ricting Leak Detector(s) for .Pressurized. Piping,. []Monitoring ~p~with Race~ay ~$ealed Concrete Racevey. ' ' ~Hal~-Cut Compatl.'ble Pipe Race~ay l-lslmthetic Liner Ra~e~y ~None [] Unkno~ [] O~her eDescri-be Make & Model: ~ : .. 8. ~ Tank Tightness " . .l~-~-Tnis Tank Been Tightness Tested? [~¥es []No ~.Unkn0~n "Date of Eas~ Tightness Test Resu}ts'o~ T&st : Test Name Testing C~npany 9.' Tank~Re ir Tank Repaired? ~¥es []No r*~lunkno~n Da ce (s) of Repa i r (s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection l-lOl~ra:or Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level []Tape Float Gauge F'lFloat Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- O~f Controls ['qCapacitance ~ensor []'Sealed Fill Box ~None [-lunkno. wn -. -- [~Othe~: List Make & ~kxtel 'For Above Devices a. Underground Piping: ~Yes []No ~Unknown ' Material Thickness (inches) Diameter . ~.e; ManuEa~turer I-1Pressure []Suction ifa'Gravity 'Approximate Length ot pipe R~ IO · . b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : .... ~ ~' [-]Galvanized I-]Fiberglass-Clad [-]Imp~eSsed Current '[~Sacrifici~l Anode : •1Polyethylene Wrap ~lectrical Isolation [-]Vinyl Wrap [-]Tar or Asphalt []Unknown [~N6~e []Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: [~]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System ~None [~Unkn0wn [-]Other (describe): 2700M STREET K E R N COUNTY HEALTH 'D E PARTM E NT' HEALTH OFFICER MAIENG ADDRESS ~ Leon M Hebertson, M.D. 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE .. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (805) 861-3636 ' Vernon S. Reichard July 28, '1988 Unocal 76 Bill Brasher ~ P.O. 1759 '~:,' "." ~'i .. California 93302 · ~'"?!'l!';'','~;,' i..'i.'~' Bakersfield, Dear Mr. Brasher, As stated in our phone conversation on July 18, 1988, I have enclosed copies of. the invoices for permits to operate for all Unocal stations that were billed and are xpast due. As we also discussed, payments for these invoices should have been submitted prior to June 5, 1988. Since we have recieved no payment, .all will be subject to the 50~ penalty charge. If you have' any fUrther questions, I can be reached at 861- 3636. Sincerely, Mary Kryszak Environmental Health. Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program MK/gb. enc 1 osur es DISTRICT OFFICES KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1700 FLOWER STREET : 'J BILLING DATE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93305 ' J 5 ' 0 · (805) 861-3636 AMOUNT DUE 140.00 AJ~OUNT ENCLOSED U~,N 0 C A L CHARGES PAST DUE ARE. SUBJECT TO PENALTY · .~CHUCK'S AUTO REPAIR *3655 2175 N CALIF-BLVD,STE 650 ' - 'J: DUEDATE DETACH HERE '1 PI. EASE RETURN THIS PORTION TO INSURE CORRECT PAYMENT IDENTIFICATION ..... !; ':'..:?~:~:' (~':"., ..... DETACH HEI~ SEXD PAYMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS TO AVOID 50% PENALTY ~,I DESCRIPTION AMOUNT §/0S,'8 PERMIT/INVOICE # 050070C-88 ANNUAL FEE FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITy ~'ITH 3 TANK(S) LOCATED AT: · IS00 PIERCE ROAD ... BAKERSFIELD. CA ~40.0 iERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 700 FLOWER STREET ~;~'. ~ ~0~~~~%%~X ~OTAL ~OUNT DUE ,1 4 0. o AEERS FiE L~,~iF~i~ 3 3~ 5.' Assoc±ated Environmental System~. ]n~ Number: P 0 BOX Si75 '2600 P!EF~CE RC=, Techpician:TCR =-,.;~-u,=,m'-'~-,=~ Groundwater Depth: 15 FT+ Blue Prints: Tank Fill/V~nt 'Product Ty~e Of Vapor Inches of :Pump :':.Tank Tank Capacity Product Tank Vapor Lines Line Recovery Water/Tank Type Material 4 5 Additional In'Formation: SITE LOG TIME Set Up E,~uii~: ' Bied F'roduct Lines: '2,']:::~ 15 Bled Vapor Lines: 20;20 ' Bled Vent lines: 2 -B~ed S ,ction Pump: =,=,~.. ...... Risers Instal =~" a) These results obtained usin.9 the patented A.E.S./Brockman system'. b) This ,md ..:method .._meets the crite~ ia set forth ir]~_N,~E..~_~:~l±~,.t. all regulatory a~encies. Certi4ied Technician Sisn'ature : 'Date AES/B~-ockman F'rec isiOn Leak ]-est ~ Technician TCR ~ Calibration Value UNITS . al. ~ Date 9/15/88 ~ System Variation : Gallons 10K ~ LOW LEVEL( ) MID LEVEL( ,'.. J Tank Diameter 80" I PRODUCT L~NE ,.'. ~ Ground Water 15 FT+ : TEST IS ~F'ASSED ()FAILED ()INCONCLUSIVE ~.'¢: ............... '. ~'~"]-L"TE S-T---COND WC ~E-D..--A T/~;~ - INCHES' '-I ...... GRA DE- ~b EVE~--~A~-/-~ .... ~ I.~CHES.-~ ~'~ . .: 4, ,i .... t, i',;',' ,% , · , ! ' ' · '"" ;;;;' h;,: ~ 1 I ' -!.,'t ] .,, ..~, · ~ Notes UNOCAL ..... 2600 F'I~ ' F . BAKERFIELD CA THIS IS A HIGH LEVEL TEST WITH 1X = CALIB. AES/B ~-oc ~:: man F' r-ec ision Leak Test I Technician TCR I Calibr-ation Value UNITS -- "6al. · I Date 9/15/88 I SYs~'em Va~-iat'i~n I Gallons 1OK I LOW LEVEL( ) MID LEVEL( " I Tank Diameter' 80" I PRODUCT LINE ; .G~-ound:.Wate~' 15 FT+ :. ;TEST IS gP~SSED '(.)FhlLED () INCONCLUSIV[ I TEST C0~-qDUCTE~ Ar INCH..= , GR~E L=~-~ ** Notes ' ' UNOCAL ~3655 ~ 2600 PIERCE RD. ~ BAKERSFIELD~ CA. PRODUCT LINE TEST .' · AES/B~,o'c kmart F'~-ec is i on Leak- Test ii"' : Technician ~ TCR : C. alibration Value~'UNITS' = ~. GaI'. · ~ Date 9/15/88 : System Variation ~ Gal Ions ~ lOK ~ LOW LEVEL( ) MID LEVEL(' )' · : Tank Dzameter PRODUCT LINE ~ - .~ .,,, ~ · .,, : ~G~'ound/Wate~' '~, . 15,FT+~ , : ~TEST IS ~)PASSED- ()FAILED UNOCAL ~5655 ,. 260© PIERCE RD. , B~KERSFIELD, CA THIS IS A HIGH LEVEL TEST WITH 1X = CALIB. AES/B~o~C kmart F' ~-ec ision Leak Tes't I 'Technician TCR : Calibration Value UNITS = Gal "{" ', Date 9/15/88 . I System Vaeiation J UNITS I . GPH I Time Started i ~: 16 : HIGH LEVEL (FULL SYSTEM) I , ~ Gallons 10K I LOW LEVEL( ) MID LEVEL( ) I I · '....} ' ' ~' ~ 89" ~ i Tank D~ameter i PRODUCT LINE i { ' ' ~' ' ::' I '~.:Ground~ Water' ~ · . 15 FT+ I TEST .IS ~F'ASSED ()FAILED ()INCONCLUsIvE'.L. : TEST'CONDUCTED AT }.~ INCHES I GRADE LEVEL AT )~ ~ INCHES . I;;'l "" ''l' d,, l?l · ,, ',; ' I ,' 'I"~'~ ,i,,,, ,:::; ]:l;,," '~' ', ' ..... ;'. . .. · * Notes UNOCAL ~5655 ,' ~600 PIERCE RD. , BAKERSFIELD, PRODUCT LINE TEST CERTIFi .ATE OF PRECISION AK TEST Associated Environmental S~stems, Inc. has tested and certifies 88 7408 ... the following: DATE: 09/13/88 CERTIFIED TESTER: TCR # 88141 LOCATION: Unocal ~f3~J55 2~J0O" Pierce Rd., Bake~;sfieid, CA TANKS: TANK LINE PROD/LINE 1. 10K S/UL PASS PASS PASS 2. - 1 OK -RTUL .... PA-S'S~ ..... PA S'S'~- .... PASS ................. ANY-FAILURE LISTED:MA-Y-:REQUI-R:E 3. , x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NOTIFICATION OF AGENCY. 4. xxxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx .'.. ~. xxxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 6. xxxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Recertification Date Recommended: I 50 ~. ~ ~, .... 'ESl' DATE: 6-8-88 .' .. ,ll~: U~OCAm' :,.;....,, ?. LOO~TIO~II~ICATIO~I BI KERSFIELD, CA ,:-.!,: .... - '"" ~ O" SUP U/L "10000 95', S'F. U/L 10000 9.5'; ST. O' ~4ASTE IL 280. 48¢ ST.' NA 90" +.001 TIGHT II¢Oi~'4ATION: ' " ~ SYSTEM ~ ¢ Pt~ ',. POLINDS POU~ MINUTES PRO~ PC CON3LUSION SUP. U/~ RED OACKET '" . 50 50 10 PASS U/L RED SACKET 50 50 , 10 RASS E: On ~ ~ion systems, ~ put mom t~an I$ psi on ~lY ~ system.. ' PROOUC:T ~0. (IN.) STATE (I~-MIN) CC/DIY CC/MIN DELTA oF CC/MIN CC/MIN GoH Y/N ' SUP. U~L 1 w/o li 1 . 90'L .781 +. 42 +.0 9 +.O0 VEL ~ Inches fra~ Tank 8otto~ to Test Level ...... "-* in Gallons Per ~ ~n ~T~ ~ ~A 32~ criterion ,of +/_ 0.0~ GPA'is u~! to mrttfy ~TO~ acconling to all standard operating procedures, lhose indicated as tight at full system m~et the criterion ~i$hed bY de National Fire Protecti~ Assoctetton Pamphlet 329 for l~cision Te~ting* Ls Conduc~ and Certified By: Test Van No. LL}I '' i; 'I Team I~nager: MATT CRDSSON ~ "' Tank,Testing Specialist:EULICE EVANS :.' i ' " ' t ..... ~:?~i:~i:<~ = :'~ ~:~:~' ~* ..... TEST ...... l l5 DEWA~T AVENUE, N.V~ ~ si,?~:~?!,! .~:?~:.~ ~'~ .~ . ~.~ . SUITE 4~ ~=, -, ~?,~;~?~ :~:'~??~ CONTRACT NUMBER ~NTON, ~ ~702 %~ ~:~. "~?~;~ RESULTS LO~A~ION ~ IDENTIFICATION NUMBERc ' ~~l NAME ~ ~T~TE SYSTEM . TANK SIZE WATER 'LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS' CONCC. CODE I I I~H~ eP~ CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS TEST ' TANK _ /4, ~o0 OTHER INFORMATION -,. _ ..... ..... ..., .. i =, PRODUCT LINES -- HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS . I ~YSTEM ~YPE OF PUMP PRODUCT PRODUCT ,ONCLUSiON/I r ~ MINUTES LOSS LOSS ' NO. P~ODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED APPLIED CC'S GPH .. RESULT / ~ ~,. ~', ~.~ ~" ~ o / o 'ti~'-~;~ , 1' [' NEVER put ~an 15 psi on any pump system. NOTE: On suction s~stems, more ~T~ER CONTR~CTORS, OF~IClA~~c~sTOM[R ~[~R[S[NT~TIVIS ~[S[NT ................ i, . t . . ~ ~ DETAIL OF'TEST RESULTS SYSTEM TEST ' TEST ~ TIME LEAK RATE COMPENSATION LEAK RATE Y or N LEVEL~ CC/MIN CC/MIN GPH NO. PRO?UCT NO. (INCHES) STARTCLOCK OURATIONHRs,.MiN. CC/DIV CC/MIN ~ e F I ~(D ~ I',0 ~O ,~1 +rl~ t,O~ ~,~ ~,,';~1 +,,:, ~ i ~.. ' LEVEL - JCHES FROM TANK BOSOM TO TEST LEVEL ALR )LUTE LEAK RATE (MEASURED LEAK RATE -- TEMPERATURE CO~ CONCLUSI -- NFPA 329 CRITERI, ON OF ~ 0.05 GPH IS USED TO CERTIFY TIGHTNESS ;ERTIFIC~TION ~is is to certi~ ~at the above descried tank systems were tested, using ~e HUNTER ENVIRONMENTAL '~~ SERVICES~ INC. LEAK LOKATOR a~ording to all standard operating pr~edures. Throe indicated as ti~t at full system mee? ~e criterion established bY ~e National Fire Protection ~iation Pamphlet 329 for Precision Testing. ~~U/R ' ~ CERTifIED aY TESTS CONDUCTED BY I~ 1' .,i" "'~'' ' ROBERT H. LEE ASSOCIATES, INC, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING gO0 LARKBPUR LANDING ClRCLI;, #125, LARKSPUR, CA 94939 - (415] 481-8890 Ms. 'Ann Boyce Kern County Environmental Health ~1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305. · #5716 - Bakersfield .~5895 - Lost Hills Dear Ms Boyce: ~:-~' Enclosed please find the tank test?'~epo~ts-for the above referenced se~ice stations as re~ired by AB 1362 (Sher Bill) for the monitoring alternatives (No's. 5 & 7) elected by Unocal. Testing for 1988 in your jurisdiction is 'Still in progress and should be completed by Septe~er of this. year. So far, all systems have tested tight and r~maining test results will be fo~arded to you as soon as possible after those stations have been 'tested.. .Please contact Mr. 'Tim Ross or Mr. Roger F°lda of Unocal at (415) 945-7676 should you have any ~estions' regarding the test results or testing program. Very truly yours, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Zaiga Gianino Project Manager ZG/cw· Enclosures Ti Ross - Unocal BRANCHEEh PETAL, lIMA, CA [7071 7BB-~12~JO BACFIAMEN?0, CA [818] 248-,400~ PHO2NIX, AZ [602] 41~P~-11~20 · ': S.l~andard Co, l, pliance Check Equipment to be Installed: - .... . Tank(s), Fl:. of L--~Suc't'ion Pressurized E]Gravit¥, Piping .Req'~ Appt'oved ~ ,~ . . ..... -~" ...... ~ .....----~:-'=-====='p~o C =~; t'-"=~i;-i;i~5;'~i--i;-~-~?i:-~'=~=~L~-~'~i~ ~-i?::-='~:f-c~.i-h~-~:':~-'~q/~"~'}'J-=~ ~.7- .......... 'Tv, or , . ~,cglass (I,'RP) ~ake & ~ode] .~ ~Fiberfflass-clad steel ~ake a Nodel .' ~ ~Uncoated steel ~ake a ~odel .--:~.'~.' :- · :.., Other ~al(e . ,.. :.. Inspection: Secondary' Containment of Tank(s) · I-]Double-wail'ed tank(s) Make & Model '-':'' ':""""?'"""~":~ ~,Synrhetic li'ner ~ake & ~odel ~L.inr~d concrete'vault(s) Sealer used ~Othet' Type Make a Model Additional: Inspection: fiO//.~ Secondary (;ontainmeut VoluJ,~e at Least lOOk of Pria~ary Tank Vo 1 u}ae ( s ) Comment: '" Inspection: · Secondary Contain~ent Volu~ae for ~ot'e Than . One Tank ' Conta.ins 150~ .of Volume of I, at-gest Pri~nary Containment of 10~ or' Aggregate Pt'i~ary Volun~e, ~hichever is Greater i Comment: Addi tional I ils pe c ~ i on: Req ' d ~ A_l!pr oved /~//~ See'on(iarg Containment Open to 'Rainfall Must. Accommodate 24 Hour Rainfall Total Volume Cern'merit: Additional: Inspection: Product Documentation Comment: Additional: , Inspection: , Annular Space Liquid is Compatible with 'Product .... : .,:-. . Comment: : · ' Inspection: :~ Primary Containment of Piping Coated steel piping Size & ~ake , ~Uncoated steel p'lplng Size ~Other ' · .~ /~ Secondal'y C(~,,~a.ilkJnent: t)f Pip:lng []SynkhcL:ic liner' in It. erich Size & Make ~0 t h e c .. C P 0 S .[ (~ 11 P r o t e c t i o n o .... ~.Tank ( s ) AddJ'tJona]: Inspection: Re ' q_'d_ ~pproved .. .' ,Additional: Inspection: Tank(s) Located no Closer thall 10 Feet to Building(s) Comment: Addition,al: " Inspection: Complete Monitoring System .:.,~ Monitoring device within secondary containment: ~'~ , .:~Liquld level indlcatdr(s). - .. ..'~Liquid Used ".'., ~Pressure sensor(s) ' ',' .~VacUum. "gauge :' ' ' ~6as °r vapor detector(s) ".- '~Nanual Inspection & samplinff Visual ~nspection Comment: ~ ' "' ~ ...... - 7---[--~' Additional: Inspection: OPeriodic tightness testing Method [~Pressure-reducing line leak detector(s) [-]Other Comment: Additional: Inspection: ~,)/,~, Overfill Protection · v r~Tape float gange(s) 'z* r~Flo'at vent valve(s) [--]Capaci tahoe sensor(s) ~High level alarm(s)' ~]Automatlc shut-off control.(s) ~]Fill box(es) with I ft. 3 volume [--]Operator controls with v.isual level laonitoring O t h ~. l:' . ~. ~~__~_ · Inspector ..... Date ,,: Extra Inspections/Reinspections/Consultations . Date: Purpose: · , ,'.',~' Comment: ' Time Utilized Date: . Purpose: Co~ent: Date: Purpose: Comment: Tlme Utilized Date: Purpose: Comment: Time Utilized Invoice Date: Total Tlme: inspector Date: Oj~¢~ Z~/~¢~~~~ ' KERN COUNTY ~zoM : ~:' · Telephone No. Permits # ~ ~~/~(zT, , ' Inspector Facility Name (~f).//5_/~. ~?,(z/f)~ Date , · . . Plot' Diagram Plot plan notes /Z//~' ~//_ /~~ ~' Yes' No ...... '~ .:. · 1 ' All new and existing tanks located on plot plan? --. ~.. 2' Does tank product correspond to product labels on .?! .plot plan? i!":!!!i' ,3. Was there no modifications identified which were · .~ not depicted on the plot plans? .'.: . If "No" described -.' ' ·,, i " -:.:, 4. Are monitoring wells secure and free of water and :; product in sump? . ..j.~':': -' S..Is pipin~ svste~ pressure, suctlo~'~-~"~r~t~'~~ ~X~ . - . : :' Yes No ..! 6. Are Red Jacket subpumps and ail line leak detector ' accessible? . .~.~? Type of line leak detector if any - · .:,.: ?.. ~m~-containment box as specified on application? ~_~ ':7: If '~No", ~hat tyPe and model number: · .::. a) ~re ~anual ~on[tor~n~ instruments, product and ,. water finding paste on premises? monitoring reservoir and alarn panel tn. proper ':- ' ~'-':'-:i:',~-., operating condition? c) Does the annular space or secondary containment ..:: liner leak detection syste~ have self diagnostic : :~ .. capabilities? If "Yes'~, is it functional ]~[ If "No", ho~ is it testeO for proper operating condition9 .KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPART~T ,,' · C"' 1700 FLOWER STREET ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION . · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SECTION PHONE (805) 861-3636 .. INSPECTION RECORD ' POST CARD AT JOBSITE ZNSTRUCTZONS: PZease eaZ~. For ~ inspector only ~hen each group of inspec~ions ~l~h ~he' s~e number are ready. They ~11 run in consecutive order beginning ~th number 1. DO NOT cover work for any number~ group until all it.s in that group are sign~ off by the Pe~itting Authority.. Follo~ng these instructions ~1t reduce the number of required inspection visits and therefore prevent assessment of additional fees.. ~ - TANKS & ·BACKFILL - INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR , ~Backfill of Tank(s) ~ ~Spark Test Certification , ~Cathodic Protection of Tank(s)' - PIPING SYSTEM - ~ ~Corrosion Protection of Piping, Joints, Fill Pipe~ , ,' ;Electrical Isolation of Pipin~ From Tank(s) ,' ', ', : Cathodie Protection Syste~P ipin~ ,' ,' - SECONDARY CONTAIN~NT, OVERFILL PROTECTION~ LEAK DETECTION - ; ~Liner InStallation - Tank(s) ~ ~Liner Installation - Pipin~ ,' ~Vault With Product Compatible Sealer ,' ,' ,' ~Level Gauges or Sensors, Float Vent Valves ~ ,' ,' :Product Compatible Fill Box(es) , ~Product Line Leak Detector(s) ,' ~Leak Detector(s) for Annular Spac~D.W. Tank(s) ,' ,' ,' ~ Monitorin~ . Well(s)/Sump(s) ,' ,' ' ~Leak Detection Device(s) For Vadose/Groundwater ' ~ :PVC Sleeve Pipin~ , ~Leak Detector(s) ' - FINAL - ~ / ~Monitorin~ Wells~ Caps & Locks ' :Fill Box Lock ' ~ : Monitorin6 Requirements ~ , ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIA .IN" ' 900 Larkspur Landing Circle ~L~-~ ~RKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 WE ARE SENDING YOU ~Attached [] Under separate cover via the following items: . ,. a Copy of leUer a Change order ~ ~T CF ~1~ ~ FAN '"' ' ' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ' For approva. I [] Approved as submitted I-I. Resubmit copies for approval [] For your use [] APproved·as noted [] Submit copies for distribution X As requested* [] Returned for corrections [] Return corrected prints [] Fo~' review and comment [] [] FOR BIDS DUE 19__ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US -F[.I,~,NK,. ¥OL,I Ul~lk~l' HI, IcH ./ COPY TO ~0~ FGWA.)' L/~'[~C.-,AL... ; SIGNED: ~~ ~, ~ If enctos,ires are not es noted, kindtv notify us at o .... ~!~ H. ~o~j PEO4~ ~ DispenSer Pan ~ ~ .;': ,7~ : w L D :~, Part Number 1020 18" x 39" w/one connector included for one pipe 18' ' 39" I == MPC Containment System. Ltd. !i 'Chicago, Illinois '~I:-IH"'ICII 'T '-,'"1 ~:l'71:lmlT ~:~. ~.--' ;HI'~I.I I ' ' ~ .' '.; (415) 461-8890 ' SUBJ~Cr...~~.~lN~ , .. . .. . ~.t: . · .... .'*~:"- ' ";~ ". .'.;'" ~ i ~ [ ' '": ' - .;.... [ ~N~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~m~o~.:._~_m......~._.~.._...~_~__:..~_~_..~.~_ ............................. -' ' ~ PLEASE REPLY ~ NO REPLY NECESSARY . " KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN:T --- 1700 Flower Street AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT · LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D. Bakersfield, ~alifornia 93305-4198 '" ~ Director of Public Health Telephone (805) 861-3621 ~ Air Pollution Control Officer :"' PER"IT TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT NUMBER #050070B Unocal ~3655 Unocal .Liquid Construction Bakersfield, CA ,, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 .... '%-.Tulare,/CA ' 93274 ,, License I I NEW BUSINESS PER~IT SXPIRSS April 11,' ~989 [~[ CHANGE OWNERSHIP ' [~[' RENEWAL APPROVAL DATE April 11~ 1988~ ' [ [ OTHER APPRO~D BY ~ . ........ ' ........... POST 0N PREMISES ' CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: l.' This permi~ applies only [o the modification of an exis~in~ feclli~y. lnvolvin~ ex~endin~ produc~ piptn8 near ~he unleaded dispenser and ins~allin~ ,a blendin~ valve. 2. All construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspe.cClon by Perki~ln8 Au~hori~y.. 3. All equipmen~ and, materials in this construction mus~ be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specitlca~lons. 4. Back~ill material for pipin~ ~o be as per munufec~urers' specifDca~ions. 5. a. Extended plpin~ system b. Leak interception pan c. Leak deCecCl°n/~oni~orln~ d. Any °,~her inspection deemed necessary by Permit~tn~ Authori~y 6. All undersround me~al connections (e.8. piping, fiC~inss fill pipes) 'muse be wrapped ~o a minimum 20 mil ~hickness with corrosion-preventive [asoline-resis~an~~ ~ape or o~her~ise pro~ec~ed ~ro'm corr°sion. Liner pan sheD1 be installed by a ~ratned experienced liner con~rac~or and lns~alla~lon:a~ site approved by the Perml~tin~ Authority'. PERMIT TO' CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND PERMIT NUMBER 050070B STORAGE FACILITY °' ADDENDUM i~_~ .... Permittee must contact Permitting AuthoPity fop on-site fnspection(s) 9. Monitoring requirements for this facility will be described on final "Permit to Operate." 10. "As Built" constructlon Drawings are to be submitted 'to the Kern County Health Department upon completion of installation at this site. ROBERT H. LEE .~ ASSOCIATES,~INC.- ARCHITECTURE PLANNING · ENGINEERING 900 LARKSPUR I,.ANDiNG ClRC""=, #1;5, LARKBPUR, ~ 94939 - (415] 481;890 ~v. H~ S~ist ~ K~ ~ty ~v. H~, ~..~ ) 1700~Fl~ S~t ~fi~d, ~ 93305 · ': Pi~ ~n~ ~. R~ ~o1~ of Un~ a~ (415) ~45-7~7~ shoed ~ou ~v~ Very Truly Yours, ~.aiga Zvirb,,] ~ s Project Manager Zz/~s ' enclosures cc: R. Fold~ - le katon ~ FINAL REPORT ' 115 DEWALT AVENUE, ........ ' .... TEST.: ..............' ..... (]~J~l :-- SUITE 4~ ~ '""'~ :' ' REsULTs -" '~ ' CANTON, OH 44~0~ ' ~''' ~ ~:~'~ CONTRACT NUMBER CITY I STATE. ~ .. ~ TEST ~ESULTS SUmmArY ~ . o.~ TANK ~IZE WATE~ LEAK LOKATO~ ~ESULTS' co~c~, coo~ P~O~U~T GALLONS DIA/~AT~ )THER INFORMATION .:'.,: ...~:::.., . PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS : :":::":" . ' ' ~ PRODUCT PRODUCT .I '~ .:" SYSTEM TYPE OF PUMP " M'N"TES 'OSS LOSS ICONCLUSION/ NO.I PRODUCT REMOTE I SUCTION APPLIED APPLIED CC S GPH OTHER CONTRACTOR~, OFFICIA~ CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE5 ~ DETAIL OF TEST R~SULTS ~ T[MPERATURE .. ' ~ TEST TIME LEAK RATE COMPENSATION LEVEL. CC/MIN CC/MIN. GPH u (I~CHES) CLOCK CC/DIV CC/MIN ~ "F · LEVEL - IN~ HES FROM TANK BOTTOM TO TEST LEVEL' ALR - LUTE LEAK RATE (ME/~SURED LEAK RATE -- TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION) IN GALLONS PER HOUR CONCLUSIOtN NFPA 329 CRITERI°N OF + 0.05 GPH IS USED TO CERTIFY TIGHTNESS --~. ,....._....-- · ' t the above described tank systems were tested, using the HUNTER ENVIRONMENTA . ' ION . This is to cer.'tify tha · indicated as ti t at full ~RVICES INC. · ........ ' ....... , ":-- ~ .... ction Association Pamphlet 329 for Precision testing. · LEAK LOKATOR according to all standard operating procedures. Those _ ..gh - . . I ii system meet',the criterion estaOllsnea Dy tne ~auona, r,.= r!u~ ........................... ~ --TE~TS CONDUCTEDBY ~ TEST VAN I O T KT ,TING SPECIALI;T -- I SIGNATURE I I ~ TJ~IK TES~TING SPECIALIST · I '~-'- . .,'} I ~ . .11 t ' ;.j. - --..: :,? ;"t..; CUSTOMER: ~ CITY: I.D. ~ i) STATE: WEATHER ' ' TIME TEMPERATURE COMMENTS BEFORE TEST - .,,~ AFTER TE~T- "[ SCHEMATIC: ~ ,; ~{: Fill Gauge Fill. Gauge Fill Gau~ Fill Oau~ Fill Gau~ m m LEVEL -. ~> GALLONS .......................... . ~ g WA~ER DROP TUBE ~ DIAMETER, INCHES ~l ~ I ~/3 ,,I ~PE OF COVER SIPHON ~0 ~0 TA~K OPENINGS ~' ~ ~> < O. P-~. VENT VALVE TYPE / ' /~ /1 .~ ~ .: [ ..... . ........ , ,~ ....... ~; ..... ~.: REPLACEN ENT PA~TS: PA~T ~ DESCRIPTION OUANTITY P~I~E' .., ADDITIC t~L CHARGES: (pumpovers,~ overtime, etc.) ~f~ I~i,~' ~ *Data obtained from ~ Station 0 LL Charts 0 Other .. ' ?.";? l{ 0 L S VI , INc· "'!:::: ''~ FINAL TEST RESULTS 15405 REDI~ILL AVENUE, SUITE C:[ i,:ii:~'~.', TEST DATE: 8-3-87 TUSTIN, CA 92680 ..[ ~.~ . i ~ ¢ 0 '-00%0 CUSTOMER: UNOCAL LOC/~T ION/I DENTI F ICAT ION NO.= 3655 ADDRESS: 2600 Pierce Bakersfield, CA '""~'! ^1. REPORT TEST RESULTS SLI4MARY LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS SYST~ TANK S ZE WATER LEVEL AIR NO. PRODUC.T GALLONS DIA/MATL INCHES IFICHES GPH CONCLUS ION RECOMMENDATIONS ! Super. 10000 ?2"/Fib 0 154 +0.025 Tight 2 U/L 15000 ~2"/FIb 0 150 +0.021 Tight Waste DI I 550 48"/ST 0 91 +0.009 Tight Other Info: . Both Super and u/L tanks were found to have 2 different type tank guards Installed together, one on top of thelothor. The top protector could not reach bottom of tank due to existing unit, causing InaCcurate level readings of gauge stick. Both tanks had 3" Jro 6" gap between actual tank botto(n and top protector. No protectors re-instal led, PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS SYSTEM TYPE OF PUMP POUNDS POUNDS M I NUTES PRODUCT PRODUCT CONCLUS I ON NO. PRODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED HELD HELD LOSS CCts LOSS GPH /RESULT 1 Super: Red Jacket 50 10 Tight 2 U/L Red Jacket 50 10 Tight NOTE= On suction systems, NE~'ER put more than 15 psi on any pump system. DETAIL OF TEST RESULTS TEST !'~ TIME LEAK RATE TEMPERATURE ABSOLUTE ~ CHECK SYSTE TEST LEVEL ~.~ CLOCK DURATION COMPENSATION LEAK RATE TEST NO. PRODUC.T NO. (IN.) ' ~TATE (HR.-MIN) CC/DIV CC/MIN DELTA OF CC/MIN CC/MIN GPA Y/N I Super I 154 ,:~;.!: I0:16 0-3'7 12.931 +38.7g~ +0.094 +37.253 +1.560 +0.025 N 2 U/L 1 150 ?':rl=Ol' 0-40 17.699 +12.050 +0.027 +10.727 +1,323 +0.021 N Waste 011 i 91 '~' ~ 9:20 0-30 7.576 + 1.263 +0.042 + 0,688 +0.575 +0.009 N ~LEVEL - Inches from Tenk~Bottom to Test Level AIR ~ - Absolute Leak Ra~e (Measured Leak Rate - Temperature Compensation) In Gallons Per Hour CONCLUSIC..~ NFPA 329 criterion of +/- 0°05 GPA Is used to certify tightness CERT I F ICAT I ON :Fh~~- I~ ~:~c~r'~=l-f:y-~i-e~'-~he- b 'ce ~nk ,;y-~Ten$ .~'er~ ~s~d, u$i~9 '~h~; ?;UNI'ER EiiVm~tUI~iEflFAL :~)~','iCE$, iNC. LEAK .LOKATOR ac :ordlng to all standard opera+lng procedures. Those Indicated as tight -at ~f~lT-system-mee~-.the criterion establlsh~ by t~he National F re Protection Association Pamphlet 329 for Precision Testing. Tests Cond :ted end Certified ~y: Test Van No.= 19 . Team Manager: John Andy Tank. Testing Specialist: Chris Durazlo I ' ' T EST · CONTRACT NUMBER CAN'T'O~, lC~, ,zo2 ':" ' :': i{:~'i~iii i~(iiiil'' .'"~:~f~:~:(;: RESULTS 21~45~1~" .'8~52~370 '~" '~ ~OCAT~ON ~DENT~F~C~ON ~UMa~ .... NAME ~,~ ~ .. : >. ~::~. ~ .: .~. ~ .'. ' · ; TEST RESULTS SUMMARY ~YST~M TANK SIZE WATER LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS' CONCL. COO~ r '"~ INCHES LEVEL ALR TEST TANK PRODUCT GALLONS D,IA/MATL I~CHZT GPH CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS . .Y . :, . , ~ - , ', . .- / ~ .... , .- . . ~. . . .. ~? ... ~ ,, .~ ,..~ ,. ,_ ,l. , ~ . z .:-,.oZ.. " ~J' ' ~ PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRE~SURE TEST RESULTS ~' PRODUCT.-. I PRODUCT ' "S~S~E~ T?PE OF PU~P ~ ~mUTES LOSS LOSS ' CONCLUmON/ ~OTE: O svstems. NEVI R put more than 15 psi on any pump system. OF TEST TEMPERATURE ABSOLUTE .... :. ,r TIME LEAK RATE COMPENSATION LEAK RATE CLOCK DURATION CC/DIV /% o F CC/MIN CC/MIN GPH i! START HRS.-MIN, · LEVEL - I~CHES FROM TANK BOT..TOM TO TEST LEVEL ALR -- ABSOLUTE LEAK RATE (MI~ASURED LEAK RATE -- TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION) IN GALLONS PER HOUR CONCLUSI,~ON -- NFPA 329 CRITER!ON OF +-0.05 GPH IS USED TO CERTIFY TIGHTNESS CERTIFICtTION This Is to certify that the above described .tank systems Were tested, using the HUNTER ENVIRONMENTAL i SERVICES., INC. LEAK I'OKATOR according to all standard operating procedures. Those indicated as tight at full system me~t the criterion established by the National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 329 for Precision Testing. CERTIFIED BY ' '-.. TESTS CONDUCTED BY , 4 -.. I .... :-'"'." . ,' /. . . . ~ _ , I .~ )~/i/~---J /':/'~'"~7 . '1 -:~.-'t .... t ~...~'--....J I ' ~x~,~ .,LA:,~ ~'Z, ,~ J --J'~/v ../l....~~*." ."""", '/'" "'" J:, .. ': ' 'Permi t Quest i.o,nnai r e Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many e o~tside Kern Co:unt¥, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of th~ fa.czfFty~where they are ,. P . 'Please fill in Permit :# and check oue of the following before returning this form with payment: Fgr PERMIT #' '050070C ' . Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility ,'to provide i Operator with pertinent X ' 2. Send all .information to Owner at. the. followlng corrected address: SERVICE STITI]3N--~. 3655 2175 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD.,SUITE 650 .... WALNUT CREEK,'CALIFORNIA 9~596 ATTENTION: MANAaER MAINTENANCE & CONSTRUCTION 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make popy of permit for Owner). / ADDRESS '' ' : · ,: ..... ~ , 'J ' ',:" ' "TEST RESULTS SUMMARY ' · oN-¥ PRODU( GALLONS' :.INCHES CONC,USION RECOMMENDATIONS' TEST TANK OTHER I~EOR ': '. " :.: ~,: .,:* ~RODUCT.LINES ~-. HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULTS .... ' ~ · . :': : :.'PRODUCT PRODUCT::. : ~'~ : MINUTES : ':-LOSS ,, :...; :'~. ,. LOSS '~.: SY,~ ~EM' "" e OF'PUMP' "' !:.~ '. ' .:' ,~;':"O~'':HI:MI= ~eh.~-,n.ou~.,v,..-----.---&PP/ll:n' :APPLIED' . ';:' CC'S .' .' GPH ' '.', RESULT )UCT' ..:'" ~ '.- C), .:/ o~. ." ' ' ~ >,-./. ..:' / .. ~, ::., : ~ , , , ~,. :',:~ q '--n s::stem:', iR.riel __ _DUmp. System::;., . ': ' ':": ~' ~ '"" .... ' " OF TEST RESULTS UTE',. " ATE ' ". ~,:='~:~ :TIME ,: LEAK RATE ' CC/MI .N CC/MIN,' "~GPH ...... " , '.'-' '"' , ":."' ~':,' , ""'::':' ":"" '"' ~i"'"'. · -~,~ , ' '~'.' . ' ' . , .,' '. · ~'.'.' ~-.,.'. '. · .' , , ~, , : ' ":' ' , ~ .. · '. ~' ~i,, iFflOMTANK'I ,)M. TO TEST LEVEL , ,' ~: : ' ' --HOUR ' ''~ ' ' '' '~ " LEVEL-- /~ . ': __._' .... '"-'~'*g.;A~'-EA~ RATE ;TEMPERATURE'COMPENSATION) IN G~LL0NS PR,, , . , '""., .' ,, '~ I ALR~- ABSOLUTE LEAK ~l = ~mc~n~'~. .... ~ - 'ESS "' ' .... co~,o~ ~ .~.~ ~ c.,,~,,o, o~_~~.o~ ' : "~ .'~at ~e above descrJ~ tank sys.m~'~re tested, us' g dica~~at full &~." .I CERTIFICA 10N., Th~s IS:[~ ~rti~ - . ' ' ' ' to all standard operating pr~edur~.Th~e ~n _ ,~ . ... - es~blished by ~e Natmna~ ~re vromc~on ~,~ ...... - · .?. [, WEATHER ,. ~*~-:~ ~.~.. ~ ~* ~.,.~,~rc,,TIME '.:.: :~:~: I SCIIEMAT ~C ~'.. '9' :~:' ~ ~'~:*'~: , : ::: ~' ~" :' : '4: ' ': ,~ ', ~., . [ * .:. ~ .;k~ · '. · - - -..4: ~ ' I: ~.,~,, .~ ,. ,: . . ,~. , ,,,.~ ..... ~ ,,,,, ,i,,, ,,t~/ ..v , . . / . .:/ ;.,.,~ ..., .:, · . . fi,,.% .'~ . . . .. :' .(". ~=~n~P~ANK NO:'.'[; ,':~,>~'~:~/:~, ?'.>::~C'~.'~> '~,":' ~/~'~.[/.:, ";.~ '~ ,':: ':; '"," ,',' ",,, Fill'.' Gau~' · ' :'-' '..'.~ :,'::.:" . :r ' . . ' . "~ .... ' ' :'r::"?, "':::<'" "' '" ,,,,:> L .' ~ . ...... .... : < ,.:: -.:.::.: :.:.:~,, :',. .._ _.: ,....: . .... ,E ',:-,, .:~ - ,.. ........ ........... , .: :.,. ,, ,.,, ~.<~',:.? ,:.:. · .., < ' ....... ' ' ' ,' ':::."~'~'~' ':~,'::~..~ < ::'!?'~', ~..:, .. "~' ~. ' ,>'.' ..... : ~::.".). ~ -' .;; ...' ,. ' ?~ . : .... '- ' ''. ',':.. /..:.. ' .,s.-: :~..':.' ' " ~,; '-,~'::~, ~q- ~-:& ~,~,"~,,~ ~ , , ..~: ~ ,.' ; . ,-, . ~ ,? . .. . , . , ,,~., , .... ,..,, ..,....... ....... .... ....... <,:,.~, .. . l~~':'.< .... ,:,' ~'-~/~'~'R~ '::" '.. '~: %c,,,~,o,...." ..'- .... -,:-..~,'" ou,,~,w.'..'.' .,':~R'C~ ".....: · .,', ~EPLACEiMENTPABI~, ..... ~: '~,' ... - '-, :... ' ~ ,. ::.' ;,....', -,.'&t~ ,' , . ',,', '.,'.. :".'., ,: .", ::':'::',; ~,:. ;t' ~"~ ' '. ....... :-~'~,<": . "' ",:":. '.. ','.:., .~ - . :.-,..'.'" '. ' '~' '.:.. .,,' .: .. ,:'. ,' ~. '"':'.' ~:..:. ,.' , ' .. ,' , ',': ...... ..', , . . ~', .... ' ' ., , ' , ' "' : . ', , , ;: ' ~'. 'L ' ' ' ' '~ ' ' '~ ' / ~' '," :,..; ..-,,. :.,....- -... ~ ' ADDiTIC ~AL ~HAR~ES: ' ' '(~um~overs, overtime, etc, I. :, .~ ~- ~'~., ~ ~)~' ~/' ''~ / ";'~'~ .... ~ "~ .,:,: ',r ,..'..: :: . :~ .:',.'.:. '. :~ ~.':,,.,,::': ,~:: ~.-,. :,, r~ ',,, , .'~ ,.~ ",,' :, '," '.'. :' -.. .,. .... ~ ......... -.~_,.:,,~,,., ~o.... ' '":" '' '~' '-'"~.' "':::::':~'r::' '" '' " :' ' ~ " ..... ';"~' ' ': ' ...... ~r ' · . ...... Da~a obtaim - · -, ' "" .- 4: ,: ' ? .... ""'~: ' .~ ...- . ::::: ~:':...: ., .. . .. . ....... .. :' '"' ? " ..... " " """?"'"'"'"" il:. OOL' ? '! O0 PENDINGToREVISIONS. UNDERGROUND TANK REGULATIONS · NEW TANKS AND PIPING ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE CORROSION PROTECTION AND BE EQUIPPED WITH SPILL CONTAINERS AND OVERFILLEQUIPMENT. · ! OWNERS ARE REQUIRED TO CERTIFY THAT TANK SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED BY TRAINED AND LICENSED CONTRACTORS. · THE EIGHT SPECIFIC MONITORING ALTERNATIVES FOR EXISTING TANKS ........ ~ARE REPL~ED-- ~ITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS GIVING MORE FLEXIBILITY TO OWNERS AND PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT OF BETTER MONITORING METHODS'· · THE TANK INTEGRITY TEST PERFORMED'AT TANK INSTALLATION IS NOT' REQUIRED IF THE TANK IS EQUIPPED WITH AN INTERSTITIAL. MONITOR CERTIFIED TO MEET' THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF A TANK INTEGRITY TEST· · LEAK DETECTION EQUIPMENT IS TO RECEIVE'INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY~ EVALUATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EPA PROCEDURES· · AFTER JANUARY 1, 1993 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION THAT UTILIZES MANUAL STICK READINGS CAN'T BE USED IF. THE GROUND WATER LEVEL I.S WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE TANK BOTTOM, AND WILL BE DISALLOWED iN ALL OTHER AREAS AFTER DECEMBER.22, 1998. -. TANKS BETWEEN 1~000-2,000 GALLONS CAN'T BE MANUALLY GAUGED AFTER 1998. · BY DECEMBER 22, 1998 EXISTING TANKS AND PIPING MUST BE EITHER REPLACED OR UPGRADED BY ADDING CORROSION PROTECTION, SPILL 'CONTA~NERS -~ND-OVERFiLL' DEVICES. CORROSION PROTECTION IS PROVIDED BY BOTH INTERIOR LINING AND CATHODIC PROTECTION· · THE ALLOWABLE TEMPORARY CLOSURE PERIOD FOR TANKS IS CHANGED FROM TWO YEARS TO ONE YEAR.- · SMALL FARM TANKS, WHEN CLOSED, MUST COMPLY WITH' THE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN THE REGULATIONS· . ~AZARDO.US MATERI.ALS DIVrSION .- 2130 G Street, Bake~.sfleld, CA 93301 . ~[o05~ 326 3970 UNDERGROUND TANK QUESTIONNAIRE I. FACILITY/SITE No.. OF TANKS DBA OR FACILITY NAME ..~PE OF BUSlNE~ ~GAS STATION ~ 2 DIS~IBUTOE KERN COUN~ PEEMff ~3FA~M ~4 P~E~ ~5OTHE~ TO OPE~E No. EMERGENCYCONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY) optional DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE No. WITH AREA COD_E ~, ' J D_AYS:_NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE No. WiTH AREA CODE J NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) ~ . TH A CODE : _ J NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE No. WITH AREA CODE II. pROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS V" BOX [~ INDIVIDUAL [~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY TO INDICATE O PARTNERSHIP [~1 COUNTY AGENCY ~ FEDERAL AGENCY CITY NAME STATE ZIPCODE t PHONE No. WITH AREA CODE III. TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ' ~' BOX ~ INDIVIDUAL [~ LOCAL AGENCY [~ STATE AGENCY OWNER'S DATE VOLUME PRODUCT IN TANK No. INSTALLED STORED ~ . . SERVICE YIN Y/N '" Y/N DOYOU HAVE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY? Y/N ~PE . c~nstructed of~ same materials Styl'e an(~}ype, then only fill one segment out.~ please, identify tanks, by owner ID #. I. ·TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS ~- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # ' : B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK 'CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE wALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER' [] 95 UNKNOWN ' SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED:TANk0 [] §9 OTHER B, TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS . [] 4 STEELCLAD W/F~BERGLASS REINFORcED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL cHLoRIDE r--]. 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE- [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 RUBBER L~NED ' [] 2 ALKYD LINING' [] 3 EPOXY, LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING C. ANTERIOR LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] ~99 OTHER IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES' NO__ ", ,' D. CORROSION J---)' 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING ' ~.r--] 3 VINYL WRAP ,,: [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5. CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ..~ :=~ [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION ~, A U 2 PRESSURE ,'A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U' 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE.. A U 7 STEELW/COAllNG A U B 100% METHANOL COMPAT1BLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 oTHER D, LEAK DETECTION [] I AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3MONITOmNG~NTERSTrr~L [] 99 OTHER " V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY REcoNCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER ' I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) . D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA. B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B, TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4. STEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] ~95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER []'~ RUBBER LmNED [] 2 ALKY~ LmNING ' [] S EPOXY UNmNG [] 4. PHENOLIC UN(NG C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? . YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED .PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION[] 91 NONE []95: UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNOERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 sINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 oTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A tJ B 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION ' A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LiNE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION !--~] '1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 'INVENTORY RECONCILIATION ~ 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC·TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [ ; -i 6 TANK TESTING . [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING '~ 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 9g OTHER , . L TANK DESCRIPTION -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN -~. OW'~E~'~ TANK I. D. # B. MANUFACTURED I C. DATE INSTALLED(MO/DAY/YEAR) , . D, TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: IlL TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA,[~,ANDC, AND ALL THAT APPLIES IN I~OX D · A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 .SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ' [] 95 UNKNOWN · ' SYSTEM . [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4, SECONDARy. CONTAINMENT (~AULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER [] .~ a*RESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 F,BERG~SS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W~F,SERG~SS RE,NFORCEDPLAS~C · ~8.. TANK MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7' ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [---t 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 R'UBBER LINED' [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING C, INTERIOR UNING [] 5: GLASS'LINING [] 8 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IS. LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__ D, cORRoSION-~' [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING ': [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS ·REINFORCED PLASTIC , UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER' :: PROTECTION [] 5,,CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91..NONE ~y.~ ..... ..:~.[] 95 IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE & IF ABovE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE ..... ~'~: ¥;~"~' A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER ' '.' : B, CONSTRUCTION A~ U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN , . '~- ":~ C, MATERIAL AND A~ U 1' BARE STEEL ;",'~A' U. 2 STAINLESS Sl~EL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE'(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE :'..:?. CORROSION A' U 5 ALUMINUM '.~A~ U 6,.'CONCRETE -. ~ -'~- U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL' 'A:U; 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION ' "A U 95 UNKNOWN "A' U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TEST1NG [] 3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION I [] 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [] ~ ~ANK TESTING .[] ~ ~NTERSTmALMO,,TOR'NG []:~ .ONE ..~.. [] 95 u.~ow. [] ~ OTHER I, TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK L D. # B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY iN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINSOXD A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM ~ 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANk3' [] 99 OTHER B. TANK [] ~ BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINL~[SS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM. [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] ~ RU~ER UNED [] ~ ALKYD UN,NG [] 3 EPOXY UN~NG [] 4 PHENOLIC UN~NG C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL? YES ~ NO__ ,. CORROSION [] I POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NoNE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN · A U 99 OTHER A U 1 BARESTEE~ A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVtNYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE C. MATERIAL AND CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U ,6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL. COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION . A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTiTIAL MONITORING ~ gg OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] ~ TANK TESTING '[~. 7 INTERSTmTmALMONITORING [] ,1 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] O0 OTHER I . , ' , ~NE~L ~R~NT 7r . o o ..':~L:?~, ' ;~,?~. ~/~:;' ~:~ SERVICE. PI~ RDSTATIONs STATE HW~36555e · 5,,-~ '~. ~, : ' ": *''? ~*'':' ' , ~' ~:~'~' FI6A 968 ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE '- I=I-ANNINQ ENGINEERING 147 LOMI'I'A DRIVE, MILL VALLEY, CALIPORNIA NM1 · [41B) 3GINC) Kern 'County Health Division of Enviro h 1700 Flower Street · ' . .. '-~ ~PLI~TIONS FOR PE~IT T0 0PE~TE ~DERGR0~D T~ ~- ............ ,-? Gentlemen, On behalf of Union' Oil"~ompany, .we are enclosing applications for Pe~its to Operate underground, ta~s at ~e following locations: · . ... ~ SS 0588 SS 3609 SS 5488 SS 1367 SS 3655 SS 5573 SS 1564 " SS 3691 : SS 5587 .SS 1612 :' SS 4669 ~- SS 5716 'SS 2989 SS 4888 SS 5895 ~ SS 3507 SS 5014 SS 6106 SS 3596 SS 5334 SS 7048 Some of the applications do not include ~e 8-1/2" x 11" Plan. These plans will be fo~arded to your office as 'soon as reduction prints can be made for these facilities, Ve~ t~ly" yours, ROBERT H. ~E ~D_ASSOCIATES Ro~r~ ~. L~ ', · Division of Environment'~J~I~ Ilea.., ppl._ .,t.ion Oate.~'/ '~-' 1700 Flower Street,' ~akersfieid, CA 93305 · : (80~) 861-3636 ... ' AI'PL1CAT10N FOI{~ PEI{MIT.TO OPERATE UNI)ER(;ROUNI) :'": ' HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type Of Application (check):' ' ~New Facility ~Modification Of. Facility ~Existing Facility ~Transfer Of Ownership A. E~ergen'cy 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days ~ Type Of Business (check): ~Oasoline Stution ~Other (describe) Is Tank(s) Located On An Agr'i~ultural Farm? ~Yes Is Tank(s) Used Primarily~For Agricultural Purposes? ~Ycs~No Facility Address .~ ~~ ~ ~~-~ Nearest Cross St.' T.:~' R " SEC (Rural Locations Only) .Owner /2~D~L Contact Person ~Address /~Z~ ~ f~. ~E {~oT ~, _Z_~.P ~ ~ Telephone ~/~-~- Address~~~ ~ ~~~ Zip ~Y~ Telepl, one~ B. Water To ~Fac{[ity PPovided By I)epth to Grofindwater: · ' Soil Characteristics At Faciliq. y Basis For Soil Type and Groundwater Uepth Ueterminati6hs C. Contractor ~,~Ce~C~~C. CA Contractor's License No. ~--~&// . Address /D$~ '~.'~ ~ ~~. ~ ' Zip ~~ Telephone Proposed Starting Date ~-/~-~ Proposed Completion Date ~ Worker's Compensation Certification No. ~,C, ~/~/~ Insurer D. If This Permit Is For Modification O~ An Existing Facility, Briefly Descri~ Modifications Proposed ~~~ ~a~&, ~ ' ' E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apl, ly}: Tank ~ ~aate Product Motor ',',.,hi,:l,~ Unieade,l ~ Regular .Idv_fl~ij~ I~i .:;,,~ I~a::te l.'n,, I (~ I ' : 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 C1 0 · 0 0 0 0 F. Chemical Composition Of Mal,~ri;,is St.~,l'cd (not nc,'~.:;~:;tl'v {',,r .,,,~,,,' Tank ~ Chemical Stoe~d (non c()mm.r,:tal name) CAS ~ (if kn,)~.m) ~l?mic:~l ..................................... 6. Transfer :Of Ownership A/,/~ · [)ate Of Transfer '~t'/1 Previous Previous Facility Name 1, al:ceDi felly all obligations of Permit No. issued I ,,,~devstand' that the Permitting Authority atay review modify 'or terminate the t~-an~l'er ()r the P(n'mit to Operate this underEround stora~, facility upon receiving this compl,'ted 'This fora has been completed under p,'~n.,Ity or' perjury and to the best of my knowledKe is tru and correct :~,~ ~e (~~. ' ~C · A ~' ~ ' ~~ A. F~;~ ' TANK # ~../ (['lhi~ LliJl bJ',i'/\l~. Pt)hi,[ '~j!.~ t~,~k.i~ ,., ..... 2. Tank [,luL,riill. '"" ~ C;~'lmn',~l.(.~,J ~] Sl'.aint~ss~lcul ~-J I'ol~vi~iyi Uhloc(de ~ Fil)eclTl~ss-Clad SLee ~ ~ Fibel. glass-l~ei~ll'ol'ued plastic J~ I](IIICI'I~I.(] g A[IlIII.JlIIIIII ~ I~['OIIZU g UIIklluWll ~] () Lhet' (llescrJ be): " ~/~ J~ LJtilel' (de.scFli)e): &lullu[actuPel': ~lateria I. 'l'hickl~ss ( Jill:lilts ) Capaclt~ (Gals.) I;' ~/~ ~ ~Other (describe): . - . . . . - '~? .' 8. Tallk gorroslolr proLeqLlOlJ , _ ' · ' L_ .' '. ~ ~~'~-d g Fiberalass-Clad g l ol~e~l, ylene t~rap ~ Vinyl Wrappina J;:, ' IT' C~hodic Pl-otectioli' ~ None ~ lmp'ressed Current System ~ Sacrificial Anode Syst~ ~. Leak DeLecLlon, ~lo,iLorlnE, ami JnLerc~! . ' ..... - a. 'l'anlc: ~ Vis'mi (vaulted tanks uilI~) ~ Ground~aLer ~loni~orinE Well(s) ~/~ ~ Vadose Zone Monitoring l~e.ll(s) ~ U-Tube Nithout I, ineu C1 U-Tube with Compatible Liner DLri~ctillg Flow To Monitoring Well(s)* ~ Vapor Detector ~ Liquid l,evel SensJ~r* ~ Conductivity SensoJ'* ~ Pressure Sensor In Annular Space Of Double Wall Tank * ~ Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From u-Tube, ~lmiitoring Well Or Annulac Space [~ Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation ~ ~ Periodic Tightness Testing [~ None ~ Unknown ~ Uther b. Pip.inK: ~ Flow-Restricting Leak DetectoP(s) Fo~ pressllrized Pipilig* ~ Honitoring Sump. With Ilace~ay ~ Sealed Concrete liaceway ~ llalf-Cut Compatible I'ipe Raceway ~ Synthetic Liner Raceway ~ None J~J UIIkliOWll ~] Othel' · Describe ~lake & Hudel: 8. Tank Ti. ~'r'i;~s Tank Uee,I 'riahtness 'rested? . O Yes ~ N(, [~ Unknown ~ D~te Of Last Tightness Test I{c, sll{~ I)f 7'eSL Test Name 'l'l{sting COllipall~ / 9. Tank l{~l)ai~: 'l'ank llepa[re(l? [g Yes C~ NO '[~] II~s~ribo ~0. Over[iLl ProLeoL~on _ ~ Illmr~tor Fjl.js, Control,s, & V ~n~l'l~, ~lonjtol's l,evo.l ~/~ ~ .Tape Float Gauge ~ FI,)aL Venl. Valve,s J~] Auto Shut-Uff COll[i'ols ~ Calmci~ance 8ensou ~ Sealed FilJ Box ~] None [3 I, lsL ~lake &'Hodel For Above Devic, . No a. Underground I~ipinJ[: ~ 'l'hi~kness (inches) ~ I~iameLof ~// Pl'essul'e g Suctiun L~ Gravity Appruxi,~a~e Length Of Pipe Riln b. Underground PiPing Corrosion p~,u~ecLiun: ~ 6alvanized ~ Fibergiass-(:lad J~ Impressed Culu'enL ~ SacriCicial ....................................... ~ pb-l~h~i~n'e'~ i~'(~"l~ ........ ~-''l~T~lyi;'i'',:i'rt'%s°'ia~'i'°'n'= ~--Vin~l-A~rap .~.L~ ~ Unknown ~ None ~ Other (,lesct'il)e): ....... : o' Unclerffl'ound Piping, Secoldal'y ~} l)ouble-Wa]l g fi~lltJieLi~' Liner SysLem .~Nonu ~ Ullkllo~ll J ~ O~her (describe): 90"0 I.~RKS~.IR L,I~NOING C]RCL]E~ ~125, ~.~RKSPUR,, CA 94939 - (415] 41~1-8890 Ms. Ann Boyce ..~Kern County Dept.of Env. Health .:~ 1700 Flower Street' · Bakersfield, CA 93305 RE: REQUEST FOR VARIANCES FROM SECONDARY " CONTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS ON SHORT PIPING ADDITIONS Dear Ms. Bcyce: Uncca! 75 h~s embarked upon a region Wide program to provide an a~~-~ gasoline product to their consumers at all service stations. Rather than install another underground tank, Unocal has opted to perform minor modifications to existing product and vapor recove~T' piping at the dispenser islands and in some cases only underneath the dispensers themselves to provide this third product. Additional product piping of approximately 0-10 feet in length or 0-10% .of the total piping may be required. On beka!f of Unocal we request your consideration for a'variance 'fr~m s~.---~,~v..~__~ containment requirements, on minor new additions to .... d~ .... piping for the fcilowinc reasons: · i. ~rom 1974-1976, Uaocal voluntarily replaced all galvanized product piping with corrosion resistant fiberg!ass~pipin~ at all service stations as part of .their own Phase I Leak Prevention Program. 2. Unocal has established as part of their Phase. II Leak Prevention Program an ongoing.tank rep!aceme~ project through which a!~ s~g~_ wall tanks and piping will be replaced with double wa~ tanks and secondarily contained piping at all se~¢ice stations. This program has been in'effect for several years and it is Unocai's intent to eventually eliminate all single wall steel tanks and sinqie wall piping from their system of se~;ice sta'~ions. 3. Red Jacket Line Leak Detectors are installed and ara omera'~ing at al! service Page Two ~ March 8, 1988"' Ms. Ann Boyce .~4. Ail stations With single wall fueling facilities are being ~ ~ precision tested for tightness on an annual basis as required by State and/or local law. ~. . .. ....... 'quired--by ~" ' ' '~' ~'~'., ~ ...... ~ .......... 52 ......... -S't'~'ti-Oh--d'ea-l'ers -'are--re - law -~- ~el-l-~--~§-'t~"~i'~Yi-~ase , agreements to perform daily inventory reconciliation on their motor vehicle fuels and to advise both government ".. agencies and company repr. esentatives when specified ' ,. ~: discrepancies occur. In addition, there are real limitations on funds, time and availability of manpower for this project. Unocal's resources ara finite. Secondary containment requirements fora project of this magnitude may make it difficult or impossible to complete with available resources. ~ It is also felt that the dollars and effort spent on creating'and monitoring a hybrid double/single wall fueling system might be more effectively'and efficiently spent within the context of Unoca!'s ongoing tank replacement program through which "complete" tank and piping, systems are replaced at all service stations on a prioritized basis. ~ Your consideration of the above is greatly appreciated. 'Should you 'have any questions or response regarding this matter, please do nct hesitate to contact our office at (415) 461-8890. Very truly yours, ROBERT H. I.~E & ASSOCIATES, INC. David M. Solomon Project Designer DMS/cz cc: M_r. Roger Folda, UNOCAL 'ROBERT H. LEE & AssociATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 900 I..~RKSPUR I.~NDING CIRCLE #125, I...~RKSPUR CA 94939 - (415] 461..-~890 March 8, 1988 " .,~Ms. Ann Boyce ' .i.! ...~Kern County Dept. of Env. Health 1700 Flower Street ~ Bakersfield, CA 93305 k, RE: UNOCAL SERVICE STATIONS .. KERN COUNTY ...~: JOB #1284 t. MINOR PIPE MODIFICATIONS AND BLEND VALVE INSTALLATION Dear Ms. Boyce: On behalf of Unocal 76 we are submitting these plans and fee of $1800.00 ($100.00 per facility) for minor piping modifications at each Unocal leased service station within your jurisdiction: S.S. #1367 - Bakersfield S.S. #7048 - Bakersfield #3507 - Bakersfield #7225 - Bakersfield #3609 - Bakersfield #4669 - Delano #3655 - Bakersfield #5334 - Greenfield #4888 - Bakersfield #4734 - Lebec. · #5488 - Bakersfield #5895-iLost Hills #5573 - Bakersfield #5716 - Oildale #6089 - Bakersfield #3596 -.Ridgecrest #6106 - Bakersfield #2989 - Taft These modifi6ations will be minimal, invo!ving~about 0-10% of the total existing piping system which is currently mon%tored with Red Jacket leak detectors. Providing these changes and 'installing a U.L. listed "Blend Valve" within selected dispensers will allow the service station dealer to provide an additional gasoline~product to the customer. We are requesting. at this time a variance from secondary containment requirements o~ these minor modifications. Please see our formal letter, attached. Please review these plans and advise this office of your Page Two March 8, 1-988.' Ms. Ann-Boyce ~As per your conversation with Paul Yamamoto of our offiCe, the Con~ractor will be installing a pan under the dispensers. AS our client has deVeloped a very rigid schedule, any &sSistance you --h/'can-provide~us~-in ~Xpediti-ngly0~-processing~would~ be'-greatly ............................ appreciated. We will be available to assist'you with any and.all .' questions you might have at '(415) 461-8890. Please advise us when permits are ready to be picked up. i ~ ~ -' , No As-Builts should be required as all construction will be as designed. Again, your assistance is greatly appreciated. Very' truly yours, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. David M. Solomon Project Designer DMS/cz" cc: Roger Folda, Unocal .. NDE TECHNOLOGY . INC **** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUN§ STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY PRECISION UOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LE~K TEST The following underground storage tank. systems have been tested and are List of Certified Tank Systems: STATI'ON NUMBER TANK NUMBER TANK 'CAPACITY T~NK CONTENTS UNOCAL 3855 IOK UNL 87 9278 UNLEADED (87 OCTANE) UNOCAL._3855 .......... '~.IOK.SUP.BZ 9278 ............... SUPER UNLEADED (9ZOC.~ANE).~_~ TANK LOCATION: UNOCAL SER¥ICE STATION 3855 ... BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 " T~NK oWNER: UNOCAL COF~ORATION NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. is authorized to test and certify these tanks by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. This CERTIFICATION Meets the requirements of State Requlations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection ~ssociation NFP6 Title 329. This certification Meets or exceeds certification standards set by the Federal, State, and Local jurisdictional agencies. Certification Date : 05/17/89 Certification No. : NDE-CT-OS/l?/89 Certified Tester' : MICHAEL DOLIM (TEST TECHNICIAN) Recertification Date Recommended : 05/17/90 Certification Signature: DIRECT0~/0F 0PERATIONS'~-'. ' NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. pROPRIETARY NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT,, O-1 TORRANCE, QR 90SO~ (21D 212-5244 NDE TECHNOLOGY . INC . **** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY **** PRECISION VOLUMETRIC qUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST The following underground storage tank system has been tested and is certi~ied.~wi~thin=.the-a~wab~e~.~im~t~.f:.NFPA~.T=~.t.~e.32~.at~:`~`~.'~j ...... -,.-,.,-= ........ -~-----='--'-?~',,-~-=-'~-=~=~.. SIX INCHES ABOVE GRADE CEVEL, STATION NUMBER TANK NUMBER TANK CAPACITY TANK CONTENTS UNOCAL 365B IOK UNL 87. 9278 ~ UNLEADED (87 OCTANE) TANK LOCATION: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3G55 ZG(~ PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 TANK O~NER: UNOCAL CORPORATION NDE TEcHNoLoGy, INC. ts authorized to test and certify this tank by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Th~s CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requiat~ons and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329. This certification meets or exceeds cert£fkcation standards set by the Federal., State, and Loca'i jurisdictional agencies. Certification Date : 0S/17/8B Certificat'ion No. : NDE-CT-OS/I?/8S Certified Tester : MICHAEL DOLIM TEST TECHNICIAN) Recertification Date Recommended : 0S/17/90 Cert i,~icat ion Signature: DAisy E/ MOSBY · BIRECTR OF OP.ERAT IONS%.~.~ NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY HOE TECHHOLOGY,.IHc. 2909 OREGON Cf., 8-1 TORRRHCE, CR 90503 (213) 21Z-G244 ~APACI'TY BZ?8 GAL PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TEG~mm~IG RESULT Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 3656' SHORT REPORT FORM ~Copyright 198S,1988 'TANK ~ 1OK UNL 8~' PAGE I TEST DATE: .05/17/89 1. Owner of storage tanks UNOCAL CORPORATION Company Represent'afire .... TONY YAP Title -MAINTENANCE ENGINEER 2 ' Mailing addre'ss of owner 2175 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD.. SUITE 650 3. Phone of owner (41'5) 94S-7676 4. Station number UNOCAL 36SS 5. Location name for tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655 Location address for tanks Z600 PIERCE ROAD '~ .BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 '~ocation phone number -~- Operator o'f location. ~ UNOCAL CORPORATION I 6. Regulatory Agency COUNTY OF KERN, .STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7. Tank designation or ID ~i 1OK UNL B? B. Date tank was tested ! 05/I?/89 9, Precision test performed,. NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM Name of testing company NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. Mailing address of testing Z909 OREGON CT., B-1 company I TORRANCE, CA 90S03 1,' Technician conducting test MICHAEL DOLIM :~"'//~?_,~( Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable Change is in accordance wi'th Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA Titl'e 329. ) MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: (-) 0.013 GALLONS PER HOUR ~ LOSS (+) or GAIN (-). Thi~ measurement is ~ithi'n the allowable li~it~ established in NFPR 329 for a tight tank: or tank system. i NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY · HOE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT., 0-1 TORRANCE, CR 90503 (21~) 212-52~ ' OAPAC~TY 9278 GRL PRECISION UNOERGROUNO TRNK RESULT ,Paten~ Pending STAT ~ UNOCRL 3BSS SHORT REPORT FORM TANK ~.IOK UNL 87 PAGE 2 TEST DATE:..OS/l?/89 PRINTOUT OF TANK'SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DRTA Tank Ouner- UNOCAL Tank Number - WEST UNLEADED Measurement ~ 59 Date o?' Test = 05/17/1989 Tank Temperature .............. = ?9,3208 Degrees F, Tank Pressure ................. = O,6SBB PSI Basic Tank Volume ************* = 92?8,6?9 GalAons Temperature Correction ******** = 114,491 Gallons Pres'burr Correction *********** = 0,032 Gallons Leak Rate Calculation Time .... = 01:03:1S " Total Fluid Level ............. = 138,0735 Inches Volume Change ......... . ........ = 0.182 Gallons Expected Level Change ........ :, = 1,0524 Inches 6vg Strat Volume Change ******* = 0,172 Gallons Avg Strat Expected Level Change = 0,9924 Inches Avg Stra~ Apparent Leak ******* = -0,013 Gallon5 fivg Strat Apparent Leak Rate ** = -0,013 Gallons/Hour COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE DATA / 'x_/ '\ ' r'~ "-., m , ~ , , ~ ~ , , ,~ , , ,m , , ,~ , , ,~ , , ,~ , , ,~ , , ,c,4 , , ,,>~ , , ,cq , , ,(,~.. ~ncon I ~ -.1 TFRT ITl-l[ - MTNIITFR NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. PROPRIETARY NDE TECH~0LO~, INC. zg090REGON CT., 8-1 IORRRHCE, CH 90503 (213) Zl2-SZ~ o ' NDE TECHNOLOGY . INC. #*** cERTIfICRTE Of UNOERGROUN0 STORRGE TRNK INTEGRITY PRECISION VOLUMETRIC qUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST 'The following underground storaQe tank sySteM has been tested and FOUR INCHES ABOVE GRBDE LEVEL. STATION NUMBER TANK NUMBER TANK CAPACITY TANK CONTENTS UN0~flL 3655 1OK SUP 92 92?8 SUPER UNLEAOED (9Z 0CTflNE) - T~NK LOCATION: UNOCRL sERVICE STATION 3GBS PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CR 93308 TANK OWNER: UNOCRL CORPORRTION NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. is authorized to test and certify this ~ank by [he: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requlations and Guideline5 based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification standards set by the Federal, State, and Local jurisdictional agencies. Certification Date : 05/17/89 Certification No. : NDE-CT-05/17/89 Certified Tester : MICHAEL DOLIM (TEST TECHNICIAN) Recertification Date Recommended : 05117190 Certification Signature: oAi Y E/ OSB¥ (' . NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY ~D[ TECHNOLOGY, lng. 2909 0REGOH CT., B-1 TORRANCE, CA 9050~ (21D 212-5244 ¢~PACiTY 9278 GAL RECISION UNDERGROUND TANK RESULT Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 3BSz3 .SHORT REPORT FORM ~Copyright 198S,1988 TANK ~ 1OK SUP 9Z PAGE 1 TEST DATE: .05/1.'7/89 '. 1. owner of storage tanks ..~ UNOCAL CORPORATION Company Representative TONY YAP Title ' MAINTENANCE ENGINEER 2.. Mailing address of owner 217S N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., SUITE _WALNUI=CREEK.,::CA94SB6 ......... --==c=~=~- - ..... 3. Phone of owner (419) 949-7676 4. Station number UNOCAL ~BSS S. Location name for tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655 Location address for tanks] Z6'0'~ PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CR 93308 ~ocation phooe number Operator of location UNOCAL CORPORATION 6. Regulatory Agency COUNTY OF'KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7. Tank designation or'ID ~ 1OK SUP BZ ; B. Date tank was tested 05/1.7/89 9.. Precision test performed NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM Name of testing company NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. Mailing address of testing 2909 OREGON CT., company TORRANCE, CA 90503 ' ~ ~ Testing company telephone (Z!3) 21Z-SZ44 ~ ~ __ ' _ // / _ 10. Technician conducting ~est MICHAEL DOLIM : /~/~-~->~' Reviewed by DAISY E. MOSBY : ~,_~x~ .... f 11. Capacity of tank 9278 Gallons 12.. Tank construc{ion'material UNKNOUN 13. Testing liquid SUPER UNLEADED (92 OCTANE) 14. A test was performed at FOUR INCHES ABOVE GRADE LEVEL. The system passed with the leak rate shown below. ' ) Allowable leak. resolution of 'instrumentation or allowable change is in accordance with Regulations and Guidelines base~ on National Fire Protection Association NFP6 Title 329. MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: () 0~022' GALLONS PER HOUR -- LOSS <+) or GAIN (-). Thi~ MeasureMent i~ within the allowable limit5 established in HFPR ~Z9 for a tight tank or tank system. NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT., B-t TORRANCE, CA 90503 <21~)212-5244 ~AP~CiTY 9Z78 GAL PRECISION UNOERGROUNO TANK RESULT Patent Pending STAT ~ UNOCAL 3BSa. SHORT REPORT FORM TANK ~' 1Ok SUP 9~ PAGE 2 TEST OATE: .OS/l?/Og PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEMLEAKAGE RATE DATA Tan~ Owner - UNOCAL ~3855 Tank Number - EAST SUPER UNLEADED 1.0K Measurement ~ 32 Date of Test = 05/17/1989 Tank Temperature .............. = 77.'7627 Degrees F. .' ' Basic Tank Volume ,~,~ = 9275.870 Gallons Temperature Correction ~--~*~ = 105 260 Gallon5 Pre~sure Correc~iGn ~,~~ = 0 022 Gallons' Corrected Volume ~,~,~~ = 9384.152 -Gallons Eeak Rate Calculation Time .... = 01:02:05 Total Fluid Level ............. = 138.4G12 Inches Volume Change .................. = 0.187 Gallons Expected Level Change = 0 2802 Inches Avg Strat Volume Change ~**~*** = 0.226 Gallons .Avg Strat Expected Level Change = 0.3380 Inches Avg Strat Apparent Leak *~**** = -0.022 Gallons Avg Strat Apparent Leak Rate ** = -0.022 Gallons/Hour COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATI]_- DATA Pas? , ~ncon TFRT TTM¢ - HTWIIT~ , NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC PROPRIETARY NDE fECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT., B-1 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (213) 212-5244 ' 68-1n£-6I i i:' ' / L 31UO UOT3~od~oD IeoO~lWOl~~3'~0/~3Np10 )tN~dl 68 / ~ / Z 31~0 ~'~ 4~no~q~ '9 A.8 ~31S31~ (~JO'O). ~ ~ A~ ~]3~ISIG 39NUH3 m]31UgANn33~ 6g /BI . ~;, _ .... ~_--, ......... ~ ......... ~ ......... ~ ......... J J'. .................... ~ ............. , ......... .......... ~J ...................... J .......... ' l J~ : J ': ...... ----~J ........................ : ......... ......... ............. ~--~ ....... . ............ ~ ) ........... ~ ....... =~ .............. (~0'0) :~, · J J ~ J J:' L~ l~3L q3A3~MO~ ~]~ANIINOOJ .......... ~ ............ ,,-- - , ................... T ............. (b~O'O)' :; ,, , ,., ~ ~ 1~31 ~383~M09 ~3~NIINOOJ .......... L .......... ~ ............ ~ .................................... ........................... ,~ ......... (bEO' ')) ~ J J GE 1931 93A39~ MO9 G3ANIINO3{ ........ :-~ ............................................................................................................ : ............. !---~ (bEO'O) '~ (B(~O'~) ~00'0 8l '3IL-~6) ~00'0 OEE'O GBE'O O'El l'~ b~ IS3~ 93A39 MO9 G3~NIIN03, O~:lE ' ..... : ......... : ..................................................................................... ................ =--=~ ............. :~ ...... (BBO'O) ~ (BOO'O) LO0'O 8T 8g'B~6; gO0'O ~8E'O OEE'O O'BI ~'B~ EB IS31~'93A39~ MO9 m]B~NIINO3J GE: IE ......... ~ ................................ ...................................................... J J ................... ~ ............. J ......... '(080'0) ~ (BOO'O) LO0'O 8~ · 089~6~ g]3"O OBE'O g~E'O 0'8~ ~'8~ JJ B8 IS3i 93A3~.~09 G3~NIINO3J ....... = .......... ,, .......... ~ ........................ (810'0) (EO0'O) LO0'O 8J ~99'6J gO0'O SJE'O OJE'O O'EI I'll ,,'~' IE ISBl 93A39~ MO9 m]B~NIINO3J, ......... G[:I~ ........... , ......... ......... ~ :~ ......... : ............................... Jig ................. J J ................................... ' (910'0) j (EO0'O) LO0'O 8J ~9~6[ J ~00'0 OJE'O GOE'O O'~J I'EI J:J OE IS31 93A3~ MOq G3~NIINODJ ......... j~,, .................................. : ......... ...... 7--9 .......... =.---'J' ............................. ~ ' J .................................... ' J~ (biO'O) ~ (~00'0) LO0'O 8J 929~6J ~00'0 ~OE'O 00~'0 0'~) ~'~J :J 6[ IS31 ~3833 MO9 m]3~NIINOOJ ' - ............................................. ~ ......... JJ .................. ~ ......... ~ ....... ~-~ .............. , ~ ~ .......... ~ ....... F ...... ) ......... (BiO"O) ~ (~00"0) LO0'i) 8l 809;6l GO0'O OOE'O G6B'O,J', O'B) )'B) J 81 1831 73537, MO9 G3~NIINO3J OO:IB ................................. = ............................................. J J .................. ~ ................... =~ ...... l--r---~ ......... ........................... ~) ............................ ......... q~jj, .................. , ...... = ................ , = ~= . ........... ~ ....................... (800"0) : IJ(EOO'O) LO0'O 8J ELg~6I GO0'O 06E'O G8~'O JJ O'Ei I'EI Jl 9T IS31 93d39{MO9 GB~NILNO3I' ..... ~ ............................ ' ................... l' ......... :: ................... ~: (900'0) ~ J OB~'O. O'~J I'll Gl IS31 93839~ ~09 m]3ONIINO3~ ~ ",, (~oo'o> u)o'o ~ ~'6I , ~oo'o ~8a'o ......... ,,,____~ ......... ---' <~ ............ T)__= ...... ~ ~ .... ~ ........................ : .................................... (bOO'O) ~ ~ I (~00'0) ~00'0 8; 'BEG~6I I ~00'0 08B'O GLB'O 0'~ ;'8'T b; : IS31 93A39~ ~09 Q3nNIINODJ Ob:08 .......... ~:: ................... Z .................................................................. =r ............. ~ ......... ,, (~00'0) LO0'O 8I 8is'6;. soo',) ~La'O OLa'O O'aI l'ai. Z~ is~i 93A3]. Ho9 Q3nNIINOOI (a)o'o) ~ j j , ' ................................................ ~ ...... FF ....... ~ ..... ~ ......... .......... ~ -~ ......... , ........... , .... : ...................... 000'0 ~ (~00'0) I ~00'0 8J O()~i~J ~00'0 OL~'O ~9~'0 O'~J i'~J ~J IS31 ~]83 MO9 q]ANIINO3J . .......... ~ ........... , ........................................................................... , ................... :~ ............. ~ ......... .... i ...... , ~ ........... J ..................................................................................... ~ ....... :F ....... bO0'O ~:) (800'0) I 100'0 8~ ~'3~'6~ GO0'O 09B'O ~GE'O O"El. ~'EEi Ol IS3i 93A3J~ M09 OBnNIINO3~ 08:C,8 ......... ~ .............. I ........................................... ---- ,, ~l .~.'' ,I 900'.0 ,] (EO0'O) I LO0'O 8[ 9b~6~ GO0'O GGE'O OGE'O O'E~ ['El 6 IS31 93A3] ~09 OB~NIIN03I , _ ....... L ~ ................. ~-~ ............. ~ ......... ,~,. ~3~NAN (G3G33N JI 3NI9 JO 3Nil ......... ~- J .......... ~INOO/JX3 :NOIIOUBINOO: 39NUH3 9NIm]U3B :~]3B3AOOBB: 9NIGU3B 9NIm3~3B ,]3BOIS3~J BNIG~3~ '" ' " - 3NAqOA I ~0 -~ 13N BOSNBS 13fl~]O~a UBIJU 3BOJ38 H3IHM Oil JO hi 9NIQ~3B HIBN39 99AJ 3SA) ......... .~ ........... :I NOISN~.JX3 ' 9~WB3HI 93A39 19NINNIg381.1 iS31 9NINNAB m]N~ .~A ' ' ' ...... . IBNIii3S JOiS9I~i3Q O~033BI 31dO G33~q,J3BJ 31~nm]~B9 S~HONI NI . l~ ~F' ...... m .......... ~ ........................ (~3A3~] I ]Bni~BB.JW31l lNOll~lnaNogJ ,, .93h3~ 3~IdQN~IS' ~:: . SB~G330~ IS31 JO ........... Il I ' ' i3~]OB.J ~ NI ' ' - ............. ~ .... ,~1 ~=-- ..... ~ .......... ~ ........... ~ ............ MO9) ~ 9NIGU3~ ~ I I I , -39N~H3:- H3U3 39NUHgI l- (U) BOIOU~ 3S~. ' ' 9U9 lOOS. Ol QBOO3B 9OBINO3 '3B~SS3B~ ::-"---- OB / 6L .: NOIIUBSIgU3 BOSN3S JO31uqnN~oO~J 3N~qOA 13NJ J NO~I~SN3dW03 3~!U~3~W31 J J (A) SIN3N3B~S~3W 3NnqoA ' . 3II~ISOBGAH ,. -?:~....: ~ ~B / ~ /~ 31~m] iS31 'eD 'pSa~]sza4eS 31~iS/A~ a~ep~so~/p~ aoza~ OOgZ SS3BOO~ NOIl~lS ~gE- B3eN~N'~NOII~IS ,~ ~eoo~o B3WOIS~3: . ?~ ',.'% ~{'-' r, % '. )~ ~ ........................... ~ ......... ~.--~-.--~-~-~-. ................ ~ ........................ LIQUID CONSTRUCTION INC/i .? ~., .~.,. ~ , .~. 'i~ili~:~.~l~', ~ ~q~E!-:>~:.~, .~'.-~. ~ .TANK TEST READINGm -~_-} ....................... ~ ~. ~ -'-~ ~--~~ ........ =-~ ............................................................................ ~ .......... ~CUSTOMER Unocal ~ ' STATION ~UMBER ;: 3655 ' STATION ADDRESS2600 Pierce Rd/Rosedale H~TY/SiATE Bakersfield, Ca. TEST DATE ~/~ ~/ 89 ~]~.~ ~ '"~ HYDROSTATIC - ~ ~ VOLUME MEASUREMENTS (V) TEMPERATURE COMF'ENSA~ION ~ ~NET VOLUME ~?CCUMULATED: SENSOR CALIBRATION79 / 80 "'.~'?~'~J~' ~~' ~ PRESSURE CONTROL ~ RECORD ~0 .001 GAL USE FACTOR (A) ~;CHANGE EACH, ," CHANGE ............... ~ ...... ~-~-J ...... ~.~J~a~J ~ .................. ~ ~ .............................................. ~ ............... ~ ~ -READING',',~ LOG OF TEST]~ROCEDURES ~ '~'~'~ .~'~STANDPIPE LEVEL >"' PRODUCT IN : PRODUCT ,' ,, .... ........... ,,,~ (LOW ...................... ~--= .......... ~-~- "~ ?~ : IN INCHES GRADUATE ~REF'LACED tCOMF'UTATION: :TEMF'~RA~UREI :~ LEVEL) DATE :RECORD DETAIL~ OF SETTING ]~.~-i.~.~,~ .... ~ ...... ~-~ ..... ~ ............. ~ .............. ( OF . ADJUSTED UF' AND RUNNING TEST. ? ~ "~'~ :BEGINNING: LEVEL THERMAL ' EXPANSION ........... ~'~ ......... (USE FULU~ LENGTH ' ~.~ READING' OF 1TO WHICH BEFORE AFTER PRODUCT SENSOR NET OR VOLUME - ~i TIME OF LINE IR~ NEEDED) ' NUMBER~'~. READING ~RESTORED READING READING RECOVERED: READING CHANGE :CONTRACTION: EXP/CONTR ~ ~. ,,~:oo ~ ~o~ ~ .~,~:~, ~z~, ...... : .......................................... ~ ...... , .... ii~- - ~ ,~ , , -,, ~ , ,~ ,, 19:15 :CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST.: · '~.~2~ le.o o.~oo o.~o' o.oso l~,ala 6o 0.084 ',: 0.026 ~ :~ .. ,,~ ~ ' - ?~:~] 1 .......................... ;;:~ ................ ~F-' ....... : ~,, - . ,,~ '::,,~r{ -~TrTrrr ........................................... 7-' ..... ' ........... 7 ....................... ~:~---:. ...... ............................... ---~-~-~ I I I I - .................................................................. 1 [- ..... ~ .... ICONTINUED LO~ LEVEL TEST I ' ':"~[II '*~'.' "~'. ~EADIN~S~OR~A~D ~ ..L.;.? . '~ I" 19,27~ "',,'" I" ..... ~___~_~=i~ ..... ~_i_ _~Jl ~--~-~- ~ ........ :% 19:25 ICONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ; '~.~1~ "1~.2 12.0 O.1BO 0.190 0.010 I 19,~92 ~0 O.OOS Il 0.002 I 0.002 ......... , ............ ~ ............ ,~ ....... ~ ................................................ , ............................. ,, ........... , ........... 19:~0 ICONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST ~ . 1~.2 12.0 0.190 O.eO0 0.010 ~ 19,21e eO . 0.008 .:: ' O.OOe ; 0.00~ 19:~5 ICONTINUED LO LEVEL TEST ": 1~.8 1~.0 0.200 0.~10 0.010 19~332 20 0.008 I I 0.00~ ~ 0.006 ..... :___~ ~ _ ................. ', .......... ~ , ..................................................... ~ ........... 1 ........... 19:o0 ,CONTINUED LO~ LEVEL TEST '~'q~ .': 1E.~ 1~.0 0.~10 0.2~0 0.010 ~ 19,35~ ~0 0.00S II 0.00~ I 0.00S -' 19:55 ICONTINUED LO LEVEL TEST ~ -.- le.8 le.O O.eeo 0.2~0 0.010 19,~72 20 0.00~ , o.ooe 0.010 2~.v5 CONTINUED LOW LEVEL TEST , . -~ ,, ~ 1~.1 , 1~.0 ,, O.e~[ , 0.24., , v.OOw ,, 1.,41( , 1~ , 0.0~7 , .(0.00~), 0.010 ..................... ~ ...................................... ~--~$ ........................................................... ~ ........... i ........... 20:10 CONTINUED LOW'LEVEL TEST : ~ 8~ ' 1~.1 12.0 :: 0.2~5 0.~50 0.005 19,~e8 Z8 OJO0~ :~ (0'.00~): 0.008 . ~* ~i~ ." , . . ... ~..,.: - ... .... .: > .,. ICUSTOMER Unocal STATION NOMBER" ~3655 ' STATION ~DDRESS 2600 Pierce Rd/Rosedale CITY/STATE Bakersfield, Ca. TEST DATE 7 / ~/ 89 , e:t~n:, r~nn. ATION~179 / 80 .'_.?L~?~ PRESSURE ~ONTROL RECOR[~ /u ,uu~ ~-u , USE FAgTOR (A) I ICH~NGE E~CHll ~CHANGE ' LOG OF TES ' , ICOMPUTATION I ~TEMPERATURE I I '~LEVEL) ., ............ - ..... ~ OF I I ,~DJUSTED ~ ' --,-.~F , ........... ~ ....... ~ ..................... ~- ~ THERMAL ' ......... (USE FULL EENGTH I READING ~[ OF ITO WHICH ~ BEFORE AFTER F'RODUCT ~ SENSOR NET ~ . OR ~I VOLUME - II ~'~ RE~DING IRECOVERED~ RE~DIN~ CHANGE ICONTR~CTIONI~ EXF'/CONTR ~I TIME OF LINE IF NEEDED) ~ NUMBER '~ READING ~RESTORED ,~ READING , _ ............... ~,-~ ......... 16:30 . ~Arrived at sit~: Took tahk burial measurements: Checked ~or Water: , ,, r, t'n set U Pdckets ~ere present in the ~ank/system. It could have an e{~ect on ~he test readings. - ' _1_ ........ ,Prepared area {or res ~ g P. , · ' _ ....... - ................................................... T ............ T , '' :Delivery truck~iarrived: .Asslstpd d~l~r In {~ll.l~g_~ask. 17 5n ~Set up test stind and started circ~'atlng pump~ mtem air .................... ~ ......... ,. 15.00 Minutes circulating ~ime. ~ ~ FACTOR - 0.000 ~ _ ................................................................... ~ , _ q ~ ___~ ......... .- ........ . ........ , ......... :: -- 0.1~0 1~,~ , ' , , ~ ...... 17:55 FIRST HIGH LEVEL : . ~ ,, ~ :SENSOR READI~G~~ ~ _ ....... % ............................... : ...................... -F ......... 18:00 ~CONTINUE[' HIBH~iLEVEL TEST : I ~, ~.~ ~:.v ~ .... ~ le:15 ~CONTINUE[,~ HIBH'}iLEVELli TEST{, E ~ 4E.3 4~.0 I I:~ .0.110 O.tEO 0.010 18.q6e.. I 18:30 ICONTINUED HIG~ LEVEL TEST I 3 I ~ ~{-'. :CONTINUED HI8H LEVEL TEST~ 5 qB.0 ,, .... ,, ......... ~ ............. ~ ........ ~CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST~ 6 Q2.0 ~ I , ,, CONTINUED HIBB LEVEL TE~T~ 7 " ~2.0 : ~CBNTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST: 9~ ~2.0 ' :CONTINUED HIGH LEVEL TEST~ 10~' : :CONtiNUeD HmH LEVEL TES~ ~. ~ .' ,, .... ~ :'~ ~, ,, · ,, .... , i' ', ~ ......... --% ........ ~ ...... ~FINISH HIGH LEVEL TEST ~ 'lq ' ~ , F'age I O{ 3 '.~ Name ol Supplier. OV~nerH or Dealer i Address No. ,~nd Street (s) CItY Rate Oata of' Test / From 15. TANK T0 TEST 1Sa. BRIEF DIAGRAM OF TANK FIELD 16. CAPACITY [] S,.l~o. Ch., · ~' ' ' . . Nominal Capacity ' Chirr Idenllty b~ poslllon .. Galt(~na [] Company Engineering . Brand a Grade . , capaclly ch.rl available ~ 17. FILL-UP FOR TEST ~ o,,o., es. Tank Dlameler ~. [. 18. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO ~EST THIS TANK ~w.t.,~..~ D U..(.~bO~.O~es~.d."hLVLLT . _. Four pound rule doea not apply Io~doublewalled tanks. . ~ TSTT ASSEMBLY 21. VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM ' '~ ' Add="~o,"~p,ob..,y ........................... 30 ~.. 24b. COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION 1. I.,ou, po,nd,uler, ulred?}i~ Yes ~ . ~ Totaltubtngtoeseemble--approxlmal. ~ / ,.. RECIPROCAL METHOD 4. Pfessme M lop of tank I '< '.I. '11 Fill pipe extends a~e grade, use lop ol lill, · ' ~ 22. Th .... I-~nsor reading after clr~let~n / ~ ~ ~ ~ Dlffete~e (./-) ......................................... ""~' ~ ' COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION (Complete after circulalion) ~ ~ ~ + ~/~ . ,/~ ~ 24a.Co,e~ed A.P.L Gmvlly Tot,[qu,nllty In R~lpt~al V~ume · - full tank (16 or 1~) thl, lank 24C. FOR TESTING WITH WATER ,. ~.~*c~& [~ ~dromeler employ~ H ~rrected A.P.I. Or~lW Wale~ Tempmature after Olrculat~n ~ The a~ve calculations are lo ~ used for d~ soft c~ndttlons t~ for Involved Product Table D .............................................. "..: ' From Table B ............................................ eslabllsh a ~slllve pr~sure advlhtage or when using the four ~und ru · to compensate for the pr~ence of su~udace water In the tank T~ansler COL Io Line 2~. Added ~rfactant? ~ Yes ~ No Transler COL to Line Refer to N.F.P.A. 30, Secllon~ 2-3.2.4 and ~7.2 and the lan~ 25, (a) x {b) = (c) '. . Cfiart for Tank Sys ightness Test, -. " ' -- -'.'.' i, ."~':' '.-::-":' "'"" . ~ ~t.~A~E ~III~' ' ' " ~,., '. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~e ~ ~ I~ . . ' . . ~. RLL-UP 9. CONT~CTOR, MECHANICS. 10. INFORMATION OR R~MARgS T~ ~ m~ ~ ~e ~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~ t~ g~ p~ for ,, 11. ~ RESULTS , ~ ~ ~ tm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ SENSOR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ . . ....' · ..1 . .; :' .~-'- .'.. ' :: -: . . . · . - .. , . · .. - . . :' .,......:,...' ~ . ' ..' · -- · -:.. _ ...'" . .:' . . . .': :..'.' .": .:. .., -..:... . · - ~... .,%; .. . ... ..' , .~:'."..' ..':_..... .:.''..: ~?~"L .';.: ..... : "' ' ' .. .Tony Yap '--- -Unocal= C~t po~at"i~n .......................................................... · · 2175 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek, Ca, 94596 Re: Unocal ~3655, 2600 Pierce Rd/Rosedale Hwy,'Bakersfield Dear Mr .' Yap: . "': .... tJ"f: .... On ~uly 5, 1989 a Petro Tire Syst'em'~est was pe:formed at ...... '~-~ .......... ; the'above-referenced"'Iocat'fOn; garbrough, Lci Technician. .The NFPA Code 329.02 criteria for,,a tight' system is a maximum loss of .05 gallons per hour. Because of the almost infinite variables involved~ this is not intended to be a mathematical tolerance and is not the permission of actual leakage. During the stand-pipe test procedure the internal liquid hydrostatic pressure applied to the .underground tank system is generally two to three times greater'than normal liquid storage pressures. This-increase in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indi6ated rate of leak accordingly. SYSTEM TEST Tank NO. 3 - North Size - 280 gallons Product - Waste Oil The test showed a. minus .012 gallons per hour. Based on the above criteria, we find the tank tested~mathematically tight. This concludes our test and findings. If you have any questions regarding the results, .please contact me. For your convenience a copy of the test results has been sent to the County.. We haVe enjoyed working With you on this project~ If you need any further information, please feel free t° call. Regards, ~ark B. Yamamoto Tank Testing Coordinator MBY/amf enclosure 1054 North 'J' Street · Post Office B~x 1220 · TUlare, California 93275 · (209) 688-1980 · x. ENVIRONM~-NTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARI~I~ENT 2700 "M"'...STREET, SUITE 300, BAKERSFIELD, CA.g3301 '~ (805)861-3636 :'t /c,.i-~-.:-:.~ UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE FACILITY · . ?;i.'-'~~- * INSPECTION REPORT PENni TI~E IN 7:0~ T~ME OUT ......................... T~ NU~E~ OF TANKS:' PER~ZT P YES ....... '~"~ ....... FAC&LITY NAME:CHUCK'S AUTO REPAIR g3655 I' F~CLLITY ADDRESS:2600 PIERCE ROAD ~.'~'~ ].V6WNERS NAME.;UNOcA~AKERSFrELD, CA ' '. :2 ,,',~,;~;~ .... "-- , '' = "-- ' ' .' _ .~'.,'..'..'~'".'-,.;~;,~ ~ ~,'~m~.,~; ;~? ,.,'~.~'., :~,~--;- ~ "*~7;'~i:?:PRIMARY C~TAINMENT ~NITORING: ' .' --~ .'.'. ~'.': :'~,~",', '~'":':i~;~: '!~~ ': ~'? 5'~:a. "Intercepting an directing system ..... ~ .... ' ~ ~, c. ~odif.ied Inventory Control ...... I ~ · ; · :::_ d....In-:ank Level Sensing Device ............... ..~ -: . '." e..Groundwa~3~ Honitoring ; 2. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MONITORING: "" } a. 'Lfne~,..:' [ . · 1 ' b. Double-Walled tank ........... ~.'' c. Gravity I' - ' OVERFILL PROTECTION: '. ,'5. TIGHTNESS TESING ' - $. NEW RUCTION/MODIFICATION8 1. CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT ~'" AUTHORIZE OPERATING CONDITION OF FACILITY ) , .............. KERN ~IJNTY A.fR .POLLUTION CC;NT~L DiSTRiCT .-' i~aker~ffe]d~ CA. 93301 (805) 861-3682 '. '' .:'. ..~' '.",2:, ~ ~, ~,~ · .. ,... :.. :.'.:. . ... ,:: ,, .. . · . .... -... · - . . . . . .: .-- -. ':-~;.:,.,F:,':',~ '"::". ' , "' ' . :' "'- : -' :.. I ........... ,' ' ' .. ". , . ~ '~ln-~ . ' '?.:,z~::~, -. 5. BROKe4 C~I LOCK ~ VAPOR CAP .... 6. FILL CA~ NOT P~PERLY S~TED. . .... ~K~ NI~ING F~ FILL cAP " '" 'T' . ' . ,'4". ;0. FILL ADAPTOR NOT TI~T 11 VA~R ADAPTOR NOT T~T i4 .... ~.,c VERT:CAL o~y IN ". CC~IAL FILL ~dBE 15. ~AX!AL ~ILL ~JBE SPRING .. ! ~-~-. m ~E~U R~4 T 'I ' ' I?. :J~E L~GTH ME~,SURE?4~T' ~ .' . 1 ~ OTHER 20 CO~TS: .~ ~T~L DZ~TR~CT ~LEf~) 209, 412 ~D/OR A12.1. ~E CAL~FO~A H~L~ · ~ SPE ....... D~A~, ~,~ ~F UP ,O $l.000.00 PER OAY FOR ~CH :~ 861 ~o~ ~- ~m. ~'~ ' -.., . K..ERN CCUNTY A~R POLLUT[CN CON,ROL 'D;[$TR~CT - p . -'~ INSPECT~ ~LTS ~ days, T= Tagged {nozzle ~a~ed out.q-order un~fi] re~ffr~) - ' ' , ~ __ U= Ta~gab~e v~8'~a~5~ ~ qeq~ fin use_ . ................ ~ ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ~ ................................................ ,,: ...... · ~ V~O~T~S: SYST~ ~RKEB HZ~ A "T" ~BE~N ~NSPECT~ ~LTS, ARE ZN V.ZO~T~ OF ~AZR ~LLUZZ~ ~T~L DZSTR~OT ~LE(S)~2 ~O/OR 412.1. ~E CALZFO~A - V,O~T,~. TcLEPH~E (Bu..) 86 ~-358. ~CE~iNG fINAL R~L~I~ OF ~E VIO~Ti~. ' NOTE: CAL~FO~A H~L~ & SAF~ ~D~ ~ECTZCN ~960-2. RE~ZR~ ~NAT ~E ~OVE L~STED 7-DAY DEFZC~CZ~ ~E ~RRECTED ~N ~ ~YS. FA~RE TO '~PLY ~Y ~LT ~N LEaL ACT~ Station Nam~~4~ '4 ~,/-~--..~ ' Tag ~-un~'~-~a, teS'-tD.L~'a Tiq~e '.~" TagNum~r r ~-~%,~ate~ ~mtor's Na~e r~ /~ ~mtor's Name ~~ /~~, '.." '. '. ~ ~ rotor's Name ~jor C,~ S~e~ ~ ~ ~ Sta.on ~dre~ ~6o~ ~ff~ ~- Station ~d,e. ' - Major Cro~ S~e~ . ~ ." ,. ~ Ma~tCm~ S~e~ Telephone NO,,~~z~- ~ ..................... Telephone No X'ZZ -~/~ ' ~'" Telephon'e No ~- 'n~or ~~ ~~ ,ns~ot ~ ~' ' ~ T~l~r readin¢ ~en Ta~d Total=r Reading ~en Ta~d ~7 g ? g O ,:. Tomli~r Reading wnen~ ~ ' 7 TM .:' ~Go' this d~": is prohibited W ~ate ~w and W~ING . ' W~iNO --.-e un- U~ of this d~ce Is prohibited ~ ~ate law and un- ~ U~ of this de~ b ~mhibited ~ ~ate law and un- authoa~d remo~l of this tag or u~ of this equipment autho~d remo~l of this. tag or u~ of this equipment autho~zed remo~l of t~is tag or use of this equipment ~tlma~mumCOn~ituted~l a~'fine' ~olaaonof $1,~°f the~r~Wdaypunkhableor a m~mum ~ a ~]1 con~itute a ~ola~on of the law punkhable ~ a ~11 constitute a ~ola~oh-of the law punishable by a ma~mum d~l fine of $1,~ ~r ~y or a m~mum ma~mum a~l fine of ~1,~ ~r day. or a me,mum c~mi~l fine of day ~r moRt~ in jml. c~minal fine of $~ ~r day and/or six months In jail. . ~ c~minal fine of $~ ~ day and/or six.mOnths in jail. I dec're under ~nal~ of ~u~ that the d~ce ta~d I declare under ~nal~ of ~u~ that the d~ce ta~d . I dec,re under ~nal~ ~f ~u~ that the de~ce ta~ed ~s not u~d. no~ ~s the tag removed, until the required ~s not used, nor ~s the lag removed, until the required · . ~:~s not used, nor ~s th~ tag removed, until the required re~i~ ~re effe~ed and the dist~ notified, re~i~ ~re effe~ed and the dis~ notified. ' .. ' re~i~ ~re effe~ed an~ the distfi~ notified. Re~ired ~ (Please pant) - ~tle. Re~lred ~ ~tle~ Re,ired ~ ~ ~tle r. ' (Plea~ pant) (PIe~e pant) ~ature ~': ~ . ,Si~ature ,, Si~ature Date ' Date ~me~ Date h~ ~me ~me T0ml~r Readin~ at ~m~ of Re.ir Total~r Reading at ~me of Re.ir To~lizer Reading at ~e of Re.ir B~ORE USlN~mlS D~leph~'~l air BEFORE USING mis D~elep~~l air B~ORE UaNG m~s ~llution control dist~ at '~ I ~ ~ u~- If re~i~ ~re made to the no~l~ ~dy ~u must nofi~ ~llution control dist~ at ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~llution control dist~ at ~ L~ ~ ~., . lhe ~un~ De~ment of Weigh~ and Measures. If re~i~ ~re ~de to the no~le ~dy ~u must noti~ If re~i~ ~re ~de t~the no~le ~dy Wu must n0t~ ~ the Coun~ De~ment of Weigh~ and Measures. the Coun~ De~ment of Weigh~ and Measures. 66253 ~r.-66254 ' ..... 6625 5 . ~ ?;,, ;-. f':, i* ' ~ ;: (?,' :' -' ~ - . . .:. ~ i~'' (~: :: : , ...'., .. ~. ...[;"~L ' ,- ;',~?..,' :: ,' ': ~ .- :,/:: ,:::.,,':, ~>'L:' ./ CAPACITY 10000 GAL PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented STAT # UNOCAL. 3655 SHORT REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1990 TANK # 1OK SUP 92' PAGE 2 TEST D~TE: 06/27/90 PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE'RATE DATA Tank Owner - UNOCAL #3655 Tank Number - 1OK SUPER UNLEADED Measurement # 32 Time-6f'"measu~ment ........... = 14:32:40 Tank Temperature .............. = 85.5695 Degrees F. Tank Pressure ......... , ....... = 0.0043 PSI Basic Tank Volume *************: 10001.453 Gallons Temperature Correction ******** = 157.356 Gallons Pressure Correction *********** = 0.000 Gallons Leak Rate Calculation Time = 01:04:51 ..... Geometry-..Band ..................... ,._..L,...,.~ ............. 0~004 .... Gallons/Hour ..... Total Fluid Level ............. 130.4742 Inches Volume Change ................. ?= 0.218 Gallons Expected'Level Change ......... 0.4991 Inches · Avg Measured Level Change ..... 0.5389 Inches Avg Volume Change = 0.233 Gallons Avg Expected Level'6G A J']]]]] '0.5352 Inches Avg Apparent Leak ............. = -0.002 Gallons Avg Apparent Leak Rate ........ -0.002· Gallons/Hour ' £OMPUTFRITED PLOT OF I FAKAGE RATE DATA .4 .! · , . ~ . ; ~ ; . : . . . '. : '. . '. ,. ,. . '. . '~ -. _1 ' NDE EN¥IRONMENIAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.05gph = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph = Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (21~) 212-5244 CAPACITY 10000 GAL PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented .. STAT.# UNOCAL 3655 SHORT REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1990 TANK # 1OK.SUP 92 PAGE 1 TEST DATE: 06/27/90 1.. Owner of storage tanks UNOCAL Company Representative TONY D. YAP Title . MAINTENANCE ENGINEER ............... _2_~.~M..~l_i_n_g~dd~.~s_._of q~=___2000 CROW CANYON PLACE, SUITE 400 ~ . .-SAN=~RAHON?=C~==94583= = ................ =.:_= 3. Phone of owner (415) 277-2310 * 4. Station number UNOCAL3655 5. Location name for tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655. Location address for tanks 2600 PIERCE ROAD '-':~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 ~"~Location phone number (805) 326-9022 ' ..~ ' -~- Operator of location- UNOCAL '~ - - '..~ ...................... ~. Tank designation or ID # 1OK SUP 92 · ........ 8. Date tank was tested 06/27/90 ' , g. Precision test performed NDE VPLT CoMpUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM - Name of testing company NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. .' Mailing address of testing 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 · Testing company telephone (213) 212-5244 10. Technician conducting test' LLOYD NCVITTIE : Test Certified by HENSLEY BARBOUR : · License Number 1189 11. Capacity of tank ' 10000 ~allons 12. Tank construction material UNKNOWN 13. Testing 1.iquid S/UNLEADED (92) 14.A Full System test was performed. The system passed with the leak rate shown below. A PRESSURE,TEST WAS PERFORMED ON THE PRODUCT LEVEL AND INDICATED NO* SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF PRESSURE. Allowable l:eak resolution of instrumentation or. allowable change is in accordance with Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire. Protection Association NFPA Title 329. MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: -0.002 GALLONS PER HOUR LOSS (+) or GAIN (-). This'measurement,is within the allowable limits established in NFPA 329 for a tight tank or.~tank system. NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy (Standard Tank); O.O5gph = Pd>O.~$/Pfa<O.05; O.lOgph = Pd>O.~/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENVIRONHENTAL COMP, 2¢090REGOH CT., B-Z.TORRANCE, CA 9050~ (213) ~1~-5244 -' N D.E ENV IRON N E.N'T A L C 0 P · · *** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND'STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY **** PRECISION VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST The following underground st6rage tank system has been tested and is certified within the allowable limit, of NFPA Title 329 at: the full system level. STATION NUMBER:~:~TANK'-NUMBER=:-~ANK~-CAPACITY .... TANK'CONTENTS:~'::' UNOCAL 3655 1OK SUP 92 10000 S/UNLEADED (92) . TANK<'LOCATiON: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 36~5' 2600 PIERCE ROAD ; ' TANK OWNER: UNOCAL NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. is authoriZed to test and certify this .?.:'-.: :... tank by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requlations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Associatiom NFPA. Title 329.- Ihis certification meets or exceeds certificatio,, standards 'set by the Federal, State, and Local jurisdictional agencies. Certification Date : : 06/27/g0 Test Results~Certified by HENSLEY BARBOUR (LIC # 118g} Recertification Date Recommended : 06/27/lggl " Certification Signature: 1189 '-' NDE ·ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.05gph = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05.; 0.10gph = Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 TORRANCE, CA 9050:5 (21:5) 212-5244 CAPACITY 10000 GaL PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented STAT # UNOCAL 3655 SHORT REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1990 TANK # 1OK UNL 87 PAGE 2 TEST DATE: 06/27/90 PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA Tank Owner - UNOCAL #3655 Tank Number - 1OK UNLEADED Measurement # 24 .... Date. of~est~.~.~_.06/2.~/1990 ................. "Time '6f measu~ement~,.~.'..".'~'~'-~4~'~26~06 Tank Temperature'. ............. : 89'.2742 Degrees F. Tank Pressure : ' 0.0163 PSI. Basic Tank Vol~'~~~ = 10000.000 Gallons Temperature Correction********: 190.373 Gallons Pres, sure Correction *********** = ,. 0.001 Gallons Corrected Volume'************** = 10190.374-Gallons~ Leak Rate Calculation Time .... = 01:02:13 Geometr~ Band .,.-,,,,~-,-.~.~-,,-...-.,.. ....... ~_0.007 ..... Gallons/Hour Total Fluid Level . ............ 126.1061 Inches Volume Change . ......... : ...... = 0.375 Gallons .. Expected Level Change ......... 0.1095 Inches Avg Strat Volume Change ******* 0.536 Gallons.' .' .'~" Avg Strat Expected Level Change 0.1565 Inches " Avg Strat Apparent Leak ******* 0.013 Gallons Avg Strat Apparent Leak Rate ** = 0.011 Gallons/Hour COMPUTFRI?FD PI OT OF I FAKAGF RATF' DATA .! Pas~ . ~FRT TTH~ -- UT~ITF~ NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY Syst~ Accuracy (Sta~ard Tank): O.05g~ = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; O. lOg~ = Pd>O.~/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-Z TOR~NCE, CA 9050~ (21~) 212-5244 CAPACITY 10000 GAL 'PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented TANKSTAT ## UNOCAL'365510K. UNL 87 SHORTpAGEREPORT1 FORM' @Copyright 1985-1990 TEST DATE: 06/27/90 1.. Owner of storage tanks UNOCAL Com@any Representative TONY D. YAP Title MAINTENANCE ENGINEER 2. Mailinc address of owner 2000 CROW CANYON PLACE,~_~U!TE...~QO 3. Phone of owner (415) 277-2310 4. Station number UNOCAL 3655 5. Location name for tanks UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655 ~ocation address for tanks 2600 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 '~Locati°n phone number {805}~ 326-g022 - Operator of location ~ UNOCAL ..,6 ..... Regulatory.Agency.. ..... ~ COUNTY oF KERN, STATE.OF CALIFORNIA 7. Tank designation or ID # ..... iOK UNL 87 8. Date tank was tested 06/27/g0 ' g. Precision test performed NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM Name of testing company NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. Mailing address of testing 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 company TORRANCE, CA 90503 Testing company telephone (213) 212-5244 ~~ 10. Technician conducting test LLOYD MCV.ITTIE : Test Certified by HENSL/Y BARBOUR :/~.m~ License Number I189 o 11. capacity of tank · 10000 Gallons 12. Tank construction material UNKNOWN 13. Testing liquid UNLEADED {87) 14.A Full System test was performed. The system passed with the leak rate shown below. A PRESSURE TEST WAS PERFORMED ON THE PRODUCT LINE AND INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF PRESSURE. A)lowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable change is in accordance with. Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329. MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: +0.011 GALLONS PER HOUR LOSS '(+) or GAIN (-). This measurement is within the allowable limits established in NFPA 329 for a tight tank or. tank system. NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.059ph : Pd>O.~5~Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph: Pd>O.~/Pfa<O.O1 . NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.'2~O~ OREGON CT., 8-2 TORRANCE, CA 0050:) (21:)) 212-5244 NDE ENVI. RONHENTAL CORP. **** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY PRECISION VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST The following underground storage tank system has~een tested and is certified' within the allowable .limit of NFPA Title 329 at: the full. system level. ........................ 'STATION:NUMBER'"-·~:::TANK-'~NUMBER ....... ~TANK~CAPA'CITT~'-~"TANK~CONTENTS ...... UNOCAL 3655 1OK UNL 87 10000 UNLEADED (87) TANK~ LOCATION: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION 3655 TANK. OWNER: UNOCAL : NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. is authorized to test and certify this tank by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFO~IA. This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requlations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Associatio~ NFPA Title 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification standards set by the Federal, State,~and Local jurisdictional agencies. Certification. Date : 06/27/90 Test ,Results Certified by HENSLEY BARBOUR (LIC # 1189) Recertification Date Recommended : 06/27/1991 certification Signature: 1189 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy (StarbOard Tank): O.05gph: Pd>O.95/Pfa~O.OS; O.lOgl~ i= Pd>O.~/Pfa~O.O1 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 T?RRANCE, CA 90503 (213) 212-5244 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. **** CERTIFICATE OF ~NDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY **** PRECISION~VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST The following'underground storage tank systems have been tested and 'are certified within the allowable limit of NFPA Title 329 at the tested level. .............................................. ~ ......... - ....... Li_sLo~_C.e ut ~.fi ed _Tan k _Syst ems: .......................... -.~ STATION NUMBER TANK NUMBER TANK CAPACITY TANK CONTENTS 'UNOCAL 3655 1OK UNL 87 10000 UNLEADED (87) . UNOCAL 3655 1OK SUP 92 10000 S/UNLEAOEO-(92)~-.-~- · i' TANK LOCATION: 'UNOCAL SERVICE STATION3655 '.~";¥.. ........................ : ........ ~ ....................... ............ 2600.PIERCEROAD ........... BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 , ' ....... TANK OWNER: ; UNOCAL i ' i: .. ; NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. is authorfzed to test and certify these tanks by'the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ! This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requlations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA Title 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification standards set by the Federal, State, and Local jurisdictional agencies. Certification Date : 06/27/90 ' Test Results Certified by : HENSLEY BARBOUR (LIC.# 1189) Recertification Date Recommended : 06/27/1991 , Certification Si'gnature: HENSLEY ~JARBOUR / 1189. · NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY System Accuracy· (Standard Tank): O.05gph = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph =!'Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01 NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. :;909 OREGON CT., B-:; TORRANCE, CA 90503 (21~.). , iLIQUID CONSTRUCTION, INC. I... / .. ,, !! ~? :,':?.,' .~', ';-...,:c !.;, ,t-. I ~? ::':~'P°.:~B°x'~ 5155 .~' .: ~;. ~' -'. ': '~?':.' :'::.<'~:/?' '.'-:..: ':< .':? '>::~: :':!~?'.;'.-' :' ' ' :" '-'.' '. : ,:..~::,, ,. ,..-...~: : ~ ...:.,~.:...... .. :. . I ':":~/"~t~n~' Ton~:Y~p ' '.': .... '.:?'~ ': . <:. '::~ ':'. .... .. '.' 83655,. ~00 Pier~e":Road,>/Bakersfield, CA. <..:'.:::::.,::/..:. · ~ > :.':': ':<}8,:':1990 ;:~:~":;:pet'~°:":Ti:t'~'.:?ystem Test was perfOrmed at: the > :/::-: r~fere~ced :~::~l.oc~t l~n.:,:~,:}~:The ....... test '->5}.Was ,'-'Performed .::.by George /?.:<~':~ ugh, :.LCI ~.,.?:~echnl~lan ...?::?~-The ..NFP~ .<~.Code 329.02 .,cr i ter la for a ..~::: ?:..:.:.~.::~ ~,~..~. tg'h~ :sys~m':ls":a'.maxfm~m .~:0~'~' :o~f ?.3)-~05 galions per hour. ><.~Because' 6f ./.':"..::'~(:"', the almost ln~infte variables involved, this ls not intended to be ~.:::~'>i~:a... ~. -mathematical .' tolerance and...:ls not- .the permission, of.actual ,.:~?:~}}~::~?~.Dur.l.ng ::~i~t, he .:~::stand-p i po :}':t est.f}::Pro~edures '/. the ..:'inter na1 :; 1 lqul d ::-::::.:'3?hydrostat ic "pressure applied · to · <the ~<.underground '.tank ': system ls .generally. two to three times greater than normal liquid storage ,~.:...::, pressures.:: This increase tn hydrostatic' pressure will amplify the ':?:,-:::fndicated.rate o~ leak accordingly.,":~,/,(.":,..:,.:,. .' -'~:., /:.:: ,, " . '. ?? syST~M ' TEsT ':.":.':'.....- :' /.:..: '... :' . . Tank No. 3 - North '?:.'*"' ' ":'/ ':'": ' : ,..,'Size - 280 Gallons .. · Product- Waste 0il ' ' : ' .~The test ".showod a ainus .0i7 g~llons pot hour-. Based on tho · ":-.',.'critoria,.we find the tank .tested mathematically tight. ' ~; · This concludes Our test findings. If you have any questions regarding the results, Please ..contact me. 'For your convenience a copy.of the test results has been sent to the County. . ' ~ · -. ..,...~: ..... .~...,... :: ..~ ..... . .. ._. ~.:,. .... -.... '. ,; ... , : .... . . ~ .,. ..~ , · .... ."..' ~ We have enjoyed-~orking ~ith You'<on this project.. IS'you need · '. any: ~urt'her in~ormation,:please ~eel ~:~ree to call. · '..:..,':':t:...~d'~?'~.:~::--:?:,: ??;4 , :~,...:, ~ ~ . ' · .' '- ..... .. : i . ~::', . ,, ':> ~-:::./.-..::::../:?.nar~ ~.~'yam~ moto . . ... , ........ :. . '" ~ Tank ~es~in~ Coordinator -.~:':~.HY/rk:.. }':..-'>.:/:. .: ;.:... } ' ..... ~ ' :, ~." :... :,..; :., :[ :, .'.. ,.,,~, ..... · . . .., ,.... . .;., ~,,;.~. ?..'.~<'".'-:,~t, ':~ i., ~,.*.. : : ~ ,.'. . : } , h" ~:,, . -. 4 '":' I"' ~ ,' .-"' ' ' '' ' ~' -,: ~ - ~{~.~.:~o~h~St ree~,~.~st..~ice. Box=q ~0 ~:~~Tulare, Cahforma 93275 ~~(209) 68~1980 , , , , ata Chart r T k ness Test :-~ :i-i ~ · i .... :cksE PRINT : ' ' · L .. :t",... :- . ' '. · '" '- ' ~ :.' : -- ".. .4::~4:t.'" ,,, % ' Name -,' - .', ' '" : · ' A~re~ , - ' Repms~lative '.:': :., .:' ~:, 7 FOR ~'~:":"~ ~ ............ ' ~ ..... ' ............ ~ .... *~'~" '"'' ........... WHO REQUESTED - ~.:.5. ~,c - 5-.;~= r · . . ..Id~tt~ ~y Oir~tion .,. Capacity - :5 , Brand~upplier . Gra~e . · Approx. Age- .- 62 INSTALLATION ':'~;:~:J:~?~]~' ~o~'~ do~ct'e~: I-~ '/ ": ' :'}' ~o~ ~,~ i~li~ ~ri~wly, , ~r~le. Bllck T~. c' Size. ~lt~ill ~lke, Dre ' ', .:~' &'"'"-' ~;'"~']~ 7. UNDERGROUND ,, m..., ...... ~,. WATER ~,.,o,,.w ...... ~,. I~ ~ ~o~ / ~ ~ ~. ~' .. · , : ~ .~'.,. · '., .. .~. ' :~?.:.:~,.:.~, ... .:.5 '"'.'.u FILL-UP , , '5 TankStO~f'll~ hr. Delel: Arranged~ , ' ' L : Tel~one :. -, . N~e I~ notice or inqui~ ' ~ny Nlme Tel~one MECHANICS. - 10. OTHER .-. INFORMATION "' '. - ' =~ ". · " ' '; ' "OR REMARKS " T~ w~ m~ on I~ a~e tank syltm ~ ~ with t~ ~ ~ for 11. TEST RESULTS · .. ~ ~ ~ ~ t.t ~ w~h ~m m fM~o~= -... ' ~ ':" L : .. ) · ' .- ':~ ' Tank Ideflflli~tiofl ': : ' , · Tighl ' i ' ~akage Indic~ late T~I~ L. - ' ':~'~"' · '~'5 : ' " '.'.:'.',-, : :' : · i .~=,:, / ~~ =~. ~f/~/7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ........ .,~> ,~,..,. ~. ,. ~. / ~ [**~r~ ~b~.~,~T~w~.-~ ~: ~,+ '-~-~,,.~:~.~,,~,~,~:~ -~:-~:,,..~ .-, ~ .... ~'""~:,'~?~¢~' '~:~? ~;~Sa,. BRIEF OI~GR~.M OF TANKFIELD 16. CAPACITY L") ~ m~n~l ~t one ~p ca~ e. ~k ~ow ~d r~d p~ure I ~ HIg~ wmer t.~e in t~nk exc~mion ' '~Pl~e ~ktogr~' ~ ~ ~ In. ' '7 'Il Fill pl~ extends a~e grade, use top of fill. ' ............... · m~ ~ ~m~e.f~ ' Tr~*fer COE to Line 2~. Add~ ' '?~!21 '- · < . r~.~ ~,, 7~/~ - .~-. ,. 30 · x~os,~ 3 -';' 34 38..~vou.~ 39. ' ,:;:~y' m~o - · ._ . :.. ' . . ~9 ~ ............ 32 , ..... ,.. · 33 .......... :)s 36. . 37. ~:'"';"'"'~ · ~5~oi ARRIVED ATTEST SITE ANI~' ME ~SURE) FO~: WATEF ON Ta'.!~ BO~ TOH ' FACT<'R. A= ( .~o~,)' . ZRANSPORT.~TRUCK: TOPPED ,)FF FANK iND "OOK I~ ~iO'a¢ OF F RODUC1 :." /grCX, 0¢o~ ' RbR¢~ ~EL CAP AND SP .ASF TUBE SET UP TE, T EQLII MENT. .. ~Vfff~ .F1;LE~IEST.EQUIPMENT WI'TII PF)DUCT & PilMP PR MED AN) R~ ~;~ :EIRST'-~SENSOR READ ING.¢;~;:~' :~--~ ~~-2 '~:" : '-::':-..... ~.~..~.~,.~ .~-:<~.¢~ --.~-~ ,.~ ' :-: ..... ~.';L_ · ' : :: ~. ' ~:': .... ~:;,.;.:.,::~ -~ ::,-... ? -... .....,. ,..~,.. . .... ~ ~ .. , .: , , ,, - . ,, ~. -~{~ ~~~~:::¢:~a:¢~?;;~::"":~:>"..","~" .' ;.<:,,~ .:~.;~ :?-' 42,, -.'.;.?~;~ ~- -- -;.'.:;"~:;~'.. -..'-: i -..- :;?' ,.:.-~-;.;,.: ~'-' :....~: ~ - :;: 4:?. ':~ ~t~'a~':~ "~' :~:' '" ..... - ,~ , '~~:~..'~~:~"~ ' ';:~':~;;" ' '"~,,~}...~~'*~'"~2:...~.,,. .... :: ................ DROP' ..... :~- TO ......... LOW' LEVEL' / ~'J/~O¢ ~TART k~_L~~_.' ~., _~;"t/Z¢o~ CONTINUED LOW LEVEL"TLS;' ~ ~e_ 12" ,/~..~__:,050--~--%- ------ -~--7°X ~ ho~ ~,oo~'i ~ '- ,:~o . _ ,., _.0.:~-_ I":"; --I' .. FT:~ ; _~..I_~_ .~ ::'~:~-F:~-~" - - ~ ' ' .-.'. I/~ '~2" ' ' L '. :, ,; . . . ,.,~,.: -~'v:u .... ' .... ~"~ SITE & TANK EVALUATION ~{~i~'~f:~:-~.~:;:'-'.:: .~-, .TANK & ASSOC..,%,,j· . .... .~ ' ~::~i~'"~ ": ....... '~T~K #2 T~K #3 TANK #4 TANK. #5 T~K #6 ~'~'~:-: ..... ~,:" EQUIPMENT --:?u, T~'"#I ~:~"~bi':~i"'~· ',' ~' % ~- ' "?':'- '-'"~ '-'"~-~' '" .... T~K' SIZE '" :'::':' /~/~' /o/~o o " ~~ o .... ~URBINE SIZE ~'~:"':":'~ .,"'~ '"~::~ :':¥~'~;:~'. ..... ~ ,~J~ ~t'~ -' '" ...... :..." ' ':'".. ..... '. ' "~ ~TU~tNE B~D ~OVERSP ILL" .~:~,~..,,.:.:...,,., ..... DISPENSER ." '.' " ~::~:~ .... " ' "' ":"-'.'~':"':~ ..... '~."" '~" .N~ ' ""' ' '- ,"' -'/:"' ~::/ ~'" ~: .... ,":' .': ~ONITORING ' · ..... . PREPPED FOR ~ONITORING . -. SUCTION S~S~ · ' SIPHONED SYSTE~ .-: .... ' -. ' .': '.' SHEAR VALVE , · :' ~'., ' ·: ' ' :' '" ' ::' .~ O~r ~' ~ ' --.-.:. ": EXPOSED ELEC ~%..,~,,...,...,..?,,,~:~.,.,....v,~s~ :.., ......,.. . : . .:., ...... . .r:;,~?.'~??::.:;.~?.;.~::~-~'.:,,..:~K PIT AREA " '" ' '" :"'' '~:?~?'~; .' '.- · ;~ . ~-" f~:il/.'-= ':-. : !:~:/??-.:,~:L :'=.:,-::" ' N STATEMENT ...... ~ .. ~ ?, ..... : .... ~', ........ , ..,:=. ~.:...':,<:~::~COMPLETIO OF WORK ~:~'~e:~-~::~,:c'~v:'ALL TE~S. AND COND IT IONS OF' .SA I D CONTACT BE~EEN LIqUID CONSTRUCT IOH I ~AS "iNsPECTED AND APPROVED 'By INSPECTION. , ", .:,.:~. -: ?. ,, ....., Owner/Agent , ,-.: ~?~:!',;;~[ ''-, ..'COHP. L~ED YORK VAS WITNESSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION FORE~N OF LIQUID CONSTRUCTION INC., :"~?~.:q ~.-~-.>' ,~-, ~' .~ ' · ,"": .J.'", ,..'. ~ . :, ,~ .' '- ..' ~,:~" '' ~'::-:,:.".'!,.~', .~' ~ -~ :~. :~ '<~ ' . '..-~-',";" -'L , ..... ".'~ -.;.:.L -,.~ .. , ':..:,' .'-'..t]F :' ;~, 2:, }~:~;~' J . ~,[-:,'- ".~'~- ~ ~. ' · -~ .~.";' '. ' '.~,-~'-.r..'''~ .: ':.~=, .,';" :.'~'.;~'~'L.?;.,-.~:;.?~:~:., ~.~:. ::', ~-, .'t =:%~-'t:~ · '-'~ -,~':' ~' .:.-'~.-. ~'~,CL~...,,-,-;.,~?- ' .-. -'- ..... CONSTRUCTION FO,~E~N - LCI - ' : .' · ?" "- ' : ' ' ~ - -. " DATE :' '" '..' . .,- ,,-.. '~ .... '"':~. .. ?..,.,, ',,"- .:"' ' · · : :L' ,:' } ..:'..'. . . ".. :'' . ,.~:'. ITEMS WHICH HAVE NoT BEEN COMPLETED ACCORDING TO SAID CONTRACT BETWESN LIQUID 1. i Date .Completed 2. Date Completed 3. Date Completed 4. Dace Completed ALL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED SATISFACTORILY AS SPECIFIED IN SAID CONTRACT BETWEEN LIQUID CONSTRUCION INC. AND : . . . Owner/Agen DATE: CONSTRUCTION FOREMAN- LCI OAT E: OWNER/AGENT cLAIM.:OF~::;?, UNO.A,', -' Ci.u~:~ AuTO R~PAIR #365~ATE 7-2.;-~u DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH .AOD~: !:~i:'2175 N.'~'~].±fo:m±a Bi'~'d. Su:i. te'~::'r650, Walnut'¢reek, Ca 94596 ' INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANT: " ' FEDERAL. TAX ID NO. (1 } CLAI~s:~UST BE SIGNED BY Ti-iF. CLAIMANT AND APPROVED BY TIlE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE SUSMISSION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR.CONTI~OI. LEI~. ., (2) CLAIMANT PE'RFORMING SERVICES TO TWO OR MORE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS MUST:.MAKE SEPARATE CLAIMS FOR' EACH DEPAI~TMENT. ~3*I-C'LAI~S:[OR-REi-/~B0-RSE~[NT"OF T~-A~EFEXP[NSES-~:;ST-INCLUDE A--S~ATEMENT-O/~ THE:BUI;~POSE OF-COUNT'Y~.RUSINES$.-. ..................... -- ' ~" 14) NO CLAI~A~ WILL BE AUDITED OR ALLOWED UNTIL THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS NAVE BEEN MET. , ' OAT19 [90~9~':' .:':: .. DESCRIPTION DO[I.~S CENTS' DEPT #4!!3 .... ".REVENUE #3398 ~dN3 #00001 ' ' '' 140 TN~ und~r~igned.'under penally o~ periury, SloleS: THai Ike abov~ cloim ond IHe ilems, are INgrain sel out or~ Irue and corr~cI. Ihal no ~rl IhereoJ Nas ~een herelo- . Jor~ ~oid; l~al I~ amounl INerein :~ ~usHy due; ond Ihal Ike some ~s pr~enled no~ Jol~r IHon one y~or a~l~r Ihe accrual ~ lh~ (ou~ ~ . - ',, ~' SELO W FOR COUNTY USE ONLY .~:,.?..~. . , .,. 023 011 Government Code Refund ' Audited]hh~'AlJowed' ' ' - 102 & & & j&.. I · ???= . ., . P~A.& 580 1151 ~5-52~ (Rev. 3/87) T O TA.L WORKSHEET FOR CLAIM FOR PAYMENT REFUND PAYABLE O SZGN~TURE OF ~PPROVA~ ~C~OUNT~NG PERMIT NUMBER TYPE OF INSTALLATION '. ( ) 1. In-Tank Level Sensor (~2. Leak Detector (,) 3. Fill Box '. l"v'" IN -TANK'--BEVEL-SENSORS-- Number of Tanks Btst By Tank ID ".--'-:.''-'~. Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer 2. LEAK DETECTORS Number of Tanks ~ L~st By Tank ID ,,~-~p~ ~/~/~. ~, ~," Manufacturer & Model Number -- Contractor/Installer 3. PILL BOXES Number of Tanks List By Tank ID _ Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer I'ONY yAP _N.C~.~t~N RAiVION OWNER/OPERATOR ' ' ..................... ,_ _.DATE ENV. SENSITIVITY ......... NUMBER OF TANKS AT T~E SITE: ........................................ EMERGENCY CONTAC'T PERSON( PRIMARY): PHONE NUMBER: ........................................... = ........................... : ...................................... EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(SECONDARY)': PHONE NUMBER: ......................................... : .................... TANK O~NEE' INFORMATION: TANK CONTENTS: TANK S MANUFACTURER YEAR 'INSTALLED CAPACITY '-CON~ENTS TANK CONSTRUCTION:' TYPE(dw sw' sec.cont.) MATERIAL INT. LININ CORROSION PROT. :.~ LEAK DETECTION: TANKS: VISUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING ~ELLS VADOSE ZONE MON~NG WELL~ U-TUBES WITH INERS' U-TUBES WITHOUT LINERS VAPOR DETECTOR LIQUI~ SENSORS CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS PRESSURE SENSORS I~"ANNULAR SPACE LIQUID 'RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS IN U-TUBES, MONITORING WELLS OR ANNULAR NONE UNKNOWN OTHER PIPING INFORMATION: TANK ~ SyST~EG~ CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ' (SU · ('SH, DW,LINED TR) LEAK DETECTION: PIPING: ~. FLOW RESTRIcTING LEAK DETECTORs EOR PRE~SUR ZE ~ PIPING MONIT '~'~ ·SUMP WITH RACEWAY ; ' S'~'~'~'~'~'"'~'~'~CRETE RACEWAY' . ..................... HALFCUT COMPATIBLE PIPE RACEWAY ......................... SYNTHETIC LINER RACENAY ................... NONE .................. UNKNOWN OTHER