HomeMy WebLinkAboutRISK MANAGEMENT 1/29/1993REMEDIAL ACTION CLOSURE REPORT
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION
29~0 PIERCE ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
lanuary 29, 1993
Prepared .by
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, California
(805) 836-0901
FAX (805) 836-0911
-Project No. EB-8228-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 2
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND ................................................... ........................................................
-'- 2.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................
2.2 Project History ................................................................. ~ .................................... 5
2.2.1 Subsurface Investigation ........................................................................... 6 .
2.2.2 Results of Subsurface Investigation ..........................................................
2.2.3 Conclusions of Subsurface Investigation ................................................... 14
2.2.4 Recommendations from the Subsurface Investigation ................................ 15
2.2.5 Soil Excavation ............................................................... , .......................... 16
3.0 BIOREMEDIATION DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING ........................................ 20
4.0 I, ROORESS sOu. SAMPLING .............................................. ~ ................................ : ................ 21
5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF TREATED SOIL .................................................................... 22
6.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS-TREATED SOIL ............................................................................ 22
7.0 CONCLUSIONs ................................................................................................................... 26
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 27
9.0 CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................... 27
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP ....................................................................................................... 29
FIGURE 2: SITE MAP .............................................................................................................. 30
FIGURE 3: TANK BOTTOMS EXCAVATION MAP ..................................................................... 31
FIGURE 4: CLARIFIER EXCAVATION MAP .................................... ~ .................. ' ...................... 32
FIGURE 5: TREATMENT CELL SAMPLING MAP:. SEPTEMBER 23, 1992 ................................ 33
FIGURE 6: TRFATMENT CELL SAMPLING MAP:. OCTOBER 1, 1992 ...................................... 34
FIGURE 7: TREATMENT CELL SAMPLING MAP:. OCTOBER 23, 1992 .................................... 35
. FIGLrRE 8: TREATMENT CELL SAMPLING MAP:. DECEMBER 1, 1992 .................................... 36
FIGURE 9: TREATMENT CELL SAMPLING MAP:. IANUARY 8, 1993 ..................................... 37
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: ANALYTICAL REPORTS - SEPTEMBER 23, 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
APPENDIX B: ANALYTICAL REPORTS - OCTOBER 1, 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
APPENDIX C: ANALYTICAL REPORTS - OCTOBER 23, 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
APPENDIX D: ANALYTICAL REPORTS - DECEMBER 1, 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
APPENDIX E: ANALYTICAL REPORTS - JANUARY 8, 1993 SAMPLING EVENT
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
A Member of The Earth Systems Group
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B · Bakersfield, CA 93313 · (805) 836-0901 · FAX ($05) 836-0911
January 29, 1993 Doc. No.:9301-5030.RPT
Project No.: EB-8228-3
Kern County Resources Management Agency
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield California 93301
Attention: Ms. Flora Darling
SUBJECT: REMEDIAL ACTION CLOSURE REPORT
FOR PETROLEUM IMPACTED SOIL
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION
2990 PIERCE ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE: REPORT OF REMEDIAL ACTION,
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(ESE, OCTOBER 20, 1992)
REFERENCE: ADDENDUM TO THE REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN,
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(ESE, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992)
REFERENCE: REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN FOR PETROLEUM IMPACTED SOILS,
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(ESE, AUGUST 14, 1992)
REFERENCE: PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION OF PETROLEUM IMPACTED SOILS,
DON KEITH TRANSPORTATION, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(ESE, AUGUST 12, 1992)
Dear Ms. Darling:
Earth Systems Environmental (ESE) has been contracted by Kern Environmental
'Service (KES) representing Don Keith Transportation to prepare this report for the
completion of the remediation activities' which have been undertaken at the Don
Keith's Asphalt and Diesel Transportation Company located at 2990 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, California (Figure 1).
Don Keith Transportation 2 January 29, 1993
These activities include the excavation and bioremediation of approximately 4,500
cubic-yards of soils impacted with petroleum hydrocarbon compounds associated
with three earthen clarifiers connected to a truck wash rack as well as excavation
and use as dust control cover of approximately 2,500 Cubic yards of an asphaltic
petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil associated with the former operation of three
tanker truck bottoms disposal pits which were documented by ESE in the above
referenced reports.
1.0 EXECUTIVE suMMARY
Excavation at the site began on September 8, 1992 and initially concentrated on the
two tanker truck bottoms disposal pits in the rear of the property (Figure 2). During
excavation an additional pit was discovered. Due to this discovery, and the Kern
County Resources Management Agency Department of Environmental Health
Services' (KCDEHS) request that the excavation be conducted to a depth of 20 feet
below surface grade, the volume of soil excavated was increased to approximately
3,000 cubic yards over an area 100 feet north to south and 50 feet east to west.
Laboratory analysis has verified no detectable concentrations beyond these limits.
The excavation pit has subsequently been baekfilled with import material, compacted
to greater than 90% maximum density, and returned to surface grade.
Approximately. 1,500 cubic yards of the excavated material consists of asphaltic
residue mixed with sandy soil. Similar material has been previously stockpiled on
site which was determined by the Regional Water Quality Control Board Central
Valley Region to be suitable for use as a dust control 'material for the property. The
KCDEHS has concurred that the newly excavated material is of a similar nature and is
therefore also suitable for dust control following the same proscribed criteria of an
application not to exceed three inches in thickness.
The other 1,000 cubic yards were a low level petroleum hydrocarbon impacted silty
sand material which has been successfully bioremediated on site. Bioremediation
continued until the concentrations of total extractable petroleum hydr6earbons as
diesel were less than 100 mg/kg. ESE recommends that the treated soil be used as
grading fill material on site.
EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation. 3 January 29, 1993
0
Upon completion of the excavation of the tank bottoms pits, focus shifted to the wash
water earthen clarifiers in the center of the property (Figure 2). Excavation
preceded to the dimensions contained in the original work plan of 75 feet east to west
-- by 40 feet north to south for a volume of petroleum hydrocarbons impacted sandy
and silty sand soil of approximately 2,250 cubic yards. Soil sampling verified clean
sidewalls for the clarifier excavation with the exception of the northeast corner of
the-excavation. In this location a 12 inch diameter pipe was observed leading to the
northeast, and surrounded by a halo of petroleum impacted soil.
Excavation was initiated on September 18, 1992 to expand the pit in this direction. It
was soon discovered that a third chamber to the clarifier system' was present to the
north and east of the original two chamber clarifier (Figure 2). Excavation has
cominued in this area through September 22, 1992 to establish the dimensions of this
third chamber. The third chamber appears to have been very similar in size to the
original excavation, and also involves approximately 2,250 cubic yards of slightly
impacted soil. Soil sampling has been conducted which verified clean sidewalls for
the third clarifier excavation. The excavation pit .has subsequently been backfilled
with import material, compacted to greater than 90% maximum density, and returned
to surface grade. The 4,500 cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil from
the three chambers has been bioremediated on site. Bioremediation continued until
the concentrations of total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel were less
than 100 rog/kg. ESE recommends that the treated soil be used as grading fill material
on site.
The soil undergoing bioremediated was placed as a one foot layer on the property.
Treatment of the soil consisted of enhancing indigenous soil microbes through the
oxygenation effects of mechanical cultivation, and accelerated through nutrient
conditioning which consisted of the one time addition of a time released
nitrogen/phosphorous additive to establish a weight ratio of carbon:106, nitrogen:16,
and phosphorous:l which has been shown to yield optimum biodegradation rates in
similar petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil. Application was in dry form using a
spreader and tilling into the soil.' This was followed by moisture conditioning using a
water truck, and a second round of tilling.
' ' EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 4 January 29, 1993
Progress of the treatment cell has been monitored through field screening as well as
periodic sampling of the soil and analysis for the presence of TEPH as diesel, and
TRPH as oil and grease. The analytical results indicated that the treatment has been
progressively successful in reducing the concentration of the diesel hydrocarbons.
On. January 8, 1993, ESE collected nine soil samples from the treatment cells, and
analyzed these samples for petroleum hydrocarbons using a fuel fingerprint. The
results of the analysis were non detected for TEPH as diesel. However, heavier
molecular weight hydrocarbons identified as crude oil remain to a maximum
-- concentration of 2,000 rog/kg. The ehromatograms for each of the samples as well as
an example of Kern County diesel and crude oil chromatograms are provided with the
laboratory reports, in Appendix A. They demonstrate how definitively the
identification of the remaining petroleum hydrocarbons is crude oil, and not diesel.
Therefore, the remaining hydrocarbons in the treated soil are similar to the material
which was previously stockpiled on site and determined by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region to be suitable for use as a dust control
material for the property. ESE recommends that the soil be removed from the
treatment cell, and spread as grading fill on the property, and that the site be
considered by KCDEHS for closure.
All methods employed by ESE for this remediation are in compliance with regulations
and guidelines set forth in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Article 11,
and Title 23, Chapter 3, California Site Mitigation Decision Tree Manual, the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 29, Part 1910, Section 120, CFR Title 40, Parts 300-399,
and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Kern County Zone Rule
463.5, as well as accepted professional environmental/geoteehnieal engineering
procedures and applicable local regulations.
I .... EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 5 January 29, I993
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND
2.1 Site Description
The site is located at 2990 Pierce Road in the city of Bakersfield in Kern County,
-- California (Figure 1). The site is currently used as a parking area where the tanker
trucks are parked.
The site is situated within a developed industrial area. Nearby surrounding
'properties are primarily retail businesses, petroleum service companies, refineries,
and actual oil producing properties. The overall site topography is essentially fiat,
with a very slight fall to the west.
2.2 Project History
Based on conversations with Chris DeArmon at Kern Environmental Services (KES),
two locations on the subject proPerty had a potential for subsurface soil impacted
with petroleum hydrocarbons and required assessment as part of a baseline
environmental assessment at Don Keith's Asphalt and Diesel Transportation Company.
The first area is that of a very large, two stage, earthen bottom clarifier system
which formerly served the truck wash for the etude oil, asphalt, fuel oil and diesel
fuel trucking firm. The elarifiers have been backfilled and no surface evidence
remains. The property owner has provided a description of the size of each clarifier,
and flagged their boundaries. The second area consists of two disposal pits in the
rear of the property which received tanker truck bottoms. The surface of these has
been covered with soil, however stained soil is visible at the surface in the location of
the two pits.
ESE has conducted an initial site characterization consisting of eleven soil borings
and laboratory analysis of 27 soil samples to evaluate the extent of petroleum
hydrocarbons impacted soil in the vicinity of both the former truck wash earthen
elarifiers and tank bottom disposal pits.
- ~ EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 6 January 29, 1993
0
2.2.1 Subsurface Investigation
Drilling of four initial borings was conducted on July 13' 1992. Drilling of seven
additional borings to more fully assess the vertical and lateral extent of the impacted
soils was conducted on August 6, 1992. A total of eleven soil borings were drilled
within this phase of soil characterization (Figure 2).
One soil boring, TH-1 was drilled on July 13, 1992 through the center of the western
of the two former truck wash clarifiers location to a depth of 31 feet below surface
grade to assess the potential for petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurface at that
locatiOn. On August 6, 1992 this boring was twinned by boring TH-IA which was
advanced to a depth of 46 feet to assess the vertical limit of the petroleum
hydrocarbons encountered in boring TH-I.'
A soil boring, TH-2 was drilled on July 13, 1992 through the center of the eastern of
the two former clarifiers to a depth of 36 feet below surface grade to assess the
potential for petroleum hydrocarbons at that location. On August 6, 1992 this boring
was twinned by boring TH-2A which was advanced to a depth of 48.5 feet to assess the
vertical limit of the petroleum hydrocarbons encountered in boring TH-2.
Soil borings TH-3A, TH-4 and TH-4A were advanced around the periphery of the two
earthen clarifiers to assess the lateral limits of the petroleum hydrocarbons
encountered in borings TH-1 and TH-2. Soil boring TH-3A was drilled drilled 35 feet
southeast of TH-2 outside of the former eastern clarifier location to a depth of 29 feet
to assess the the potential for lateral migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in that
direction. Soil boring TH-4 was drilled drilled 20 feet north of TH-2 to a depth of 26
feet to assess the the potential for lateral migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in
that direction. Soil boring TH-4A was drilled drilled 35 feet southwest of TH-I to a
' ' depth of 35 feet to assess the the potential for lateral migration of petroleum
hydrocarbons in that direction.
EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 7 january 29, 1993
0
A soil boring, NP was drilled through the center of the northern tank bottom disposal
pit location to a depth of 27 feet below surface grade to assess vertical migration of
petroleum hydrocarbons at that location. Soil boring TH-3 was drilled drilled 25 feet
northeast of NP to a depth of 31 feet to assess the the potential for lateral migration of
petroleum hydrocarbons in that direction. A soil boring, SP was drilled through the
center of the southern tank bottom dispOsal pit location to a depth of 36 feet below
surface grade to assess vertical migration of petroleum hydrocarbons at that location.
Soil boring SPL was drilled drilled 35 feet east of SP to a depth of 21 feet to assess the
the potential for lateral migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in that direction.
To better define the limits of the two tank bottoms disposal pits a backhoe operated by
Kern Environmental Service was used to excavate five foot deep trenches in the rear
portion of the property. Upon exposing the limits of the pits a composite soil sample
was collected from the sludge within the two pits at a depth of three feet below
surface grade.
S0il Investigation Laboratory_ Analysis
Twenty-six soil samples and one sludge sample were submitted to B. C. Laboratories of
Bakersfield, California for analysis. All twenty-seven samples were analyzed for
Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) as oil and grease using USEPA Test
Method 418.1. Seven of the samples including the tank bottoms sludge were analyzed
for California Title 22 metals. Six of the samples including four from the area of the
earthen clarifiers, and two from the area of the tank bottoms disposal pits were
analyzed for volatile and semi-volatile organics using USEPA Test Methods 8240 and
8270. Five samples including the sludge were analyzed for Total Extractable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TEPHd) using the DOHS LUFT Manual Method. Four
deeper soil samples beneath the earthen clarifiers were analyzed for total lead using
the DOHS LUFT Manual Method. The tank bottom pit sludge was also analyzed for fuel
constituent volatile aromatics using USEPA Test Method 8020, and for pH.
"- EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 8 January 29, 1993
· 0
2.2.2Re~jlts of the Investigation
Geologic Setting
Regional Geology: The site is lOcated in the southern part of the Great Valley
geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south trending valley,
approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide. Surface and groundwater in the San
Joaquin. Valley is derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada mountain range to
the east, and is transported by five major rivers, the southern most being the Kern
River. The subject, site is located approximately 1/2' mile northwest of the Kern
River.
The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated
Pleistocene (1.6 million to'l 1,000 years ago) and Recent (I1,000 years ago to the
present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly
lake bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments which
extend to crystalline basement at approximately 20,000 feet.
Site Geology: Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial
sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping gently to
the west. The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly indurated and dissected fan
deposits (CDMG,1964).
The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer was estimated prior to drilling to be
approximately 50 feet below surface grade beneath the site (Kern County Water
Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1991 Report on Water Conditions, February
1992). Groundwater was not encountered in boring TH-2A which penetrated to a
depth of 48.5 feet. The deepest samples in the borings were moist, but did not have an
indication that the capillary fringe to groundwater was at that depth.
- Because of the six consecutive years of drought, and the discontinuance by the Kern
County Water Agency of using several large water recharge percolation ponds 1t2
mile to the north, a drop in the elevation of groundwater by as much as 25 feet may
have occurred in the area.
..... EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 9 January 29, 1993
O
The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is eight miles to the
southeast at a depth of 20-feet in the abandoned Kern River channel to the ancient
Kern Lake Bed (Kern County Water Agency, 1991 Water Supply Report, May 1992). No
perched groundwater is known to exist beneath the subject site.
Subsurface material encountered during drilling was alluvium to the total depth of
each boring. The alluvium was characterized by unconsolidated, highly permeable,
light brown, silty sand (SM) to a depth of approximately 7 feet, overlying
unconsolidated, highly permeable, tan, well graded fine- to coarse- grained sand
(SW) to a depth of approximately 23 feet. This is underlain by a sequence of
unconsolidated, highly permeable, light tan, fine- to coarse- grained gravelly sand
(SW/GW) to a depth of 38 feet. Beneath this is a sequence of unconsolidated, highly
permeable, light tan, fine- to coarse- grained sand (SW) to a depth of 43, overlying
unconsolidated, highly permeable, light tan, well graded fine- to coarse- grained
moderately silty sand (SW/SM) to a depth of approximately 46 feet. This is underlain
by a sequence of consolidated, moderate to low permeability, light tan, very clayey
silt (ML/CL) to a depth of 48.5 which was the greatest, depth investigated.
Laboratory Analytical Results - Soil Investigation
Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) as oil and grease were detected at
a concentration of 7,900 rog/kg at 10 feet in boring TH-I advanced through the
center of the western clarifier location, but not at 20, 30, 40 and 45 feet in boring
TH-IA advanced in the same location. TRPH was detected at a concentration of 10,000
mg/kg at'10 feet in boring TH-2 advanced through the center of the eastern elarifier
location and 40 rog/kg at 20 feet in boring TH-2A, but not at 40 and 47 feet in boring
TH-2A. TRPH was not detected at depths of 15 and 25 feet in boring TH-3A advanced 35
feet southeast of TH-2 on the outside of the former clarifier location, or at depths of
10 and 20 'feet in boring TH-4 advanced 20 feet north of TH-2, or at depths of I0 and 25
feet in boring TH-4A advanced 35 feet southwest of TH-1. However, TRPH was detected
at 20 mg/kg at a depth of 35 feet in boring TH-4A. Total Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons as diesel (TEPHd) were analyzed for in the soil samples at 20 feet in
borings TH-IA and TH-2A at concentrations of 19 mg/kg, and 23 rog/kg, respectively,.
EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 10 January 29, 1993
0
The fuel constituent volatile aromatics m- and p-xylenes were detected at a
concentration of 0.006 rog/kg at I0 feet in boring TH-I. The fuel constituent volatile
-- aromatics toluene was detected at a concentration of 0.022 mg/kg at'10 feet in boring
TH-2. No other volatile organic hydrocarbons including those which constitute fuels.
and industrial solvents were detected at or above the minimum detection limit in the
four soil samples collected from the clarifier area.
No semi-volatile organic hydrocarbons (base neutral and acid extractables) were
detected at or above the minimum detection limit in the four soil samples collected
from the clarifier area.
Lead was detected at an elevated concentration in one of eight samples from the
clarifier area. Total lead was detected at a concentration of 27 mg/kg at a depth of 10
feet in boring TH-2 advanced through the center of the eastern elarifier, but was not
detected in boring TH-2A at 20 and 40 feet, at 10 and 20 feet in boring TH-4 position 20
feet north of TH-2, and at I0 feet in boring TH-1 or 20 feet in boring TH-lA both
located in the center of the western elarifier. Total lead was detected at 2.7 rog/kg at
20 feet in boring TH-lA.
The State of California Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) for lead is
1,000 mg/kg. However, the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) for soluble
lead is 5 rog/kg. Because of the 10:1 dilution that occurs during the wet extraction
any total concentration less than 50 rog/kg will necessarily be determined to have a
soluble component less than the STLC of 5 mg/kg. Therefore, a soluble lead wet
extract was not performed on the sample in this investigation with a concentration
of total lead detected of 27 rog/kg.
Arsenic, barium, chromium, cobalt, copper, nickel, vanadium, and zinc were detected
in the four soil samples from the elarifier area at concentrations typical of the
background concentrations for these metals in the soil in the area of the subject
property. The other Title 22 metals were not detected in the four soil samples from
the clarifier area.
"- E1~-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT .
Don Keith Transportation 1 1 January 29, 1993
Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) as oil and grease was .detected at a
concentration of 45,000 rog/kg is the composite sample of the sludge from at depth of
-- three feet within the tank bottoms disposal pits. Total. Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons as diesel (TEPHd) was detected at a concentration of 12,000 mg/kg in
this sample. The fuel constituent volatile aromatics benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
and total xylenes were detected at concentrations of 0.013 mg/kg, 0.038 rog/kg, 0.021
mg/kg, and 0.177 mg/kg, respectively. The pH of the sludge was measured at 7.17.
TRPH was not detected in the north pit vertical assessing boring NP at depths of 10, 20
and 25 feet, and in the north pit lateral boring TH-3 at 15 and 25 feet. TRPH was
detected in the south pit vertical assessing boring SP at 10 feet at a concentration of
20 rog/kg and 25 feet at a concentration of 60 mg/kg and in the south pit lateral
boring SPL at I0 feet at a concentration of 160 mg/kg, but not in vertical assessing
boring SP at a depth of 35 feet, or in the south pit lateral boring SPL at 20 feet.
The semi-volatile organic hydrocarbon diethyl phthalate was detected at a
concentration of 0.1 rog/kg at 15 feet in boring TH-3 advanced adjacent to the
northern tank bottoms disposal pit. No other volatile organic hydrocarbons, or semi-
volatile organic hydrocarbons were detected at or above the minimum detection limit.
in the two samples collected from the area of the tank bottoms disposal pits.
Lead was detected at an elevated concentration in the sample of the sludge from the
disposal pits. Total lead was detected at a concentration of 44 mg/kg. The State of
California Title 22 TTLC for lead is 1,000 mg/kg. However, the STLC for soluble lead is
5' mg/kg. Because of the 10:1 dilution that occurs during the wet extraction any total
concentration less than 50 mg/kg will necessarily be determined to have a soluble
component less than the STLC of 5 mg/kg. Therefore, a soluble lead wet extract was
not performed on the sludge sample.
-'- EB-8228-3 9301-$030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 12 January 29, 1993
0
Cadmium was detected at 1.2 mg/kg in the sludge; Cadmium's TTLC is 100 mg/kg, and
STLC is 1 mg/kg. Copper was detected at 66 mg/kg in the sludge. Copper's TTLC is
2,500 mg/kg, and STLC is 25 mg/kg. Mercury was detected at 0.39 rog/kg in the
-- sludge. Mercury's 'I'FLC is 20 mg/kg, and STLC is 0.2 mg/kg. Nickel was detected at 61
mg/kg in the sludge.. Nickel's TTLC is 2,000 rog/kg, and STLC is 20 mg/kg. Vanadium
was detected at 8'/ mg/kg in the sludge. Vanadium's TTLC is 2,400 mg/kg, and STLC is
24 mg/kg. Each of these concentrations are far below their respective regulatory
limits. Therefore, the sludge is not classified as a hazardous material by RCRA and
California Title 22 criteria.
However, these concentrations are in excess of that which occurs in the native soil
and indicates an accumulation from the petroleum products. There may be a minor
amount of mobility for these metals from the sludge into the underlying soil,
however this has not been observed in the investigation.
The Regional Water Quality Control Board provides recommended guidelines for TRPH
as oil and grease, TEPH as diesel, the fuel constituent volatile aromatics, benzene,
toluene, ethYlbenzene and total xylenes, and the semi-volatile organic hydrocarbon
diethyl phthalate using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most stringent
current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 100 to account for
attenuation due to site-specific parameters including vertical separation to ground
water, soil lithology, fractures in subsurfaces, annual average precipitation, and any
direct conduits to groundwater. These recommended guidelines are 1,000 rog/kg for
TRPH as oil and grease, 100 rog/kg for TEPH as diesel, 0.3 mg/kg for benzene, 1.0
rog/kg for toluene, 4.0 mg/kg for ethylbenzene, 3.0 mg/kg for total xylenes, and 50
mg/kg for diethyl phthalate.
Laboratory analytical results for the twenty seven soil samples from the eleven soil
borings are summarized in Table 1.
.v. EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 1 3 January 29, 1993
0
,- TABLE- 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
values in milli
l~oring ~! TRPH~ .... ~_~L~---~;,=t-t~ ene Ethyl-' ~)tal Diethvl Total"
-'- Oil & Gre_~_sel benzene Xvlenes Phthalate Lead
TH-I 10' 7,900 ,ND .~ ND. 0.006 'ND ND
TH-IA 20' ND , ,I..ND
TH-IA 301 ND 2.7
TH-lA 40' ND
TH-IA 45' ND ......
TH-2 i0' 10,000 '"SD 0.022 ND ND ND 27
TH-2A 20' 40 ....... ND
TH-2A 40' ND .ND
TH-2A 47' ND
'-' TH-3A 15' ND ,
TH-3A 25' ND
TH-4 .10.'." ND ND .. ND ND SD . .ND ND
TH-4 20' ND ND. ND , ND ~ ND ND ND
TH-4A I0' ND ........
TH-4A 25' ND ,
TH-4A 35' 20
Sludge. '3' 45~000 0.,013 0.038, 0.021 0.177 44
NP 10' ND
NP. 20' ND ...
NP 25' ND ..
TH-3 15' ND ND ND ND SD 0.1 3.0
TH-3 25' SD ND .,ND ND ND ND ,ND
SP 10' 20
sP 25, 6o . .
sP 35 ND . .
SPL 10' 1,60 ....
SPL 20' ND
AL NA 1~000 0.3, 1.,0 4.0 , 3.0 50,,, , NA
TI~LC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ,! 1000
MRL NA ' 20 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 ,,,2.5
ND: None Detected at or above minimum reporting level (MRL).'
NA: Not Applicable.
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for concentrations in soil.
Recommended guidelines were calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 100 to account for
attenuation due to soil composition and distance from groundwater.
TTLC: State of California Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration.
'- EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 14 January 29, 1993
0
2.2.3 Conclusions of the Subsurface Investigation
The data obtained suggest that soil impacted beneath the former location of the truck
wash earthen clarifiers has been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons at
concentrations in excess RWQCB recommended guidelines to a depth of less than 20
feet below surface. The data does not indicate that fuel constituents, solvents, or
heavy metals have impacted this soil. ESE concludes that the petroleum
hydrocarbons detected represent heavier molecular weight crude oil and refined
products .devoid of known hazardous constituents. The lateral extent of this impacted
soil does not extend laterally from the boundaries of the former clarifiers.
Therefore, ESE estimates that the soil between the base of the former clarifiers at a
depth of ii feet to a depth of 18 feet has concentrations of TRPH as oil in grease in
excess of the recommended guidelines over an area 75 feet long by 40 feet wide for a
volume of impacted soil of approximately 1,000 cubic yards. It was ESE's opinion that
excavation of the soil to these dimensions would remove all of the impacted soil with
concentrations of TRPH as oil and grease in excess of 100 mg/kg.
The operation of the tank bottoms disposal pits appears to have impacted the soil to a
depth of less than 10 feet at the location of the pits. The data does not indicate that
fuel constituents, solvents, or heavy have impacted this soil. However, the sludge
does contain slightly elevated concentrations of heavy metals, but remains classified
as non-hazardous by RCRA and California Title 22 criteria. ESE concludes that the
petroleum hydrocarbons detected represent heavier molecular weight crude oil and
refined products. The lateral extent of this impacted soil does not extend laterally
from the boundaries of the disposal pits. Therefore, ESE estimates that the soil within
the northern pit to a depth of 10 feet has concentrations of TRPH as oil in grease in
excess of the recommended guidelines over an area 30 feet long by 25 feet wide for a
volume of impacted soil of approximately 140 cubic yards, and soil within the
southern pit to a depth of 10 feet over an area 55 feet long by 15 feet wide for a
volume of approximately 150 cubic yards. It was ESE's opinion that excavation of the
soil to these dimensions would remove ali of the impacted soil with concentrations of
TRPH as oil and grease in excess of 100 me/kg.
EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 15 January 29, 1993
2.2.4 R~comm~ndations from the Subsurface Investigation
ESE recommended excavation and surface bioremediation of the soil beneath the
-- former clarifiers, and excavation and use as dust. inhibitor of the crude oil and
asphalt sludge from the disposal pits.
ESE recommended that the impacted soil from beneath the former clarifiers be
excavated to a depth 18 feet and treating the soil to concentrations less than the
RWQCB recommended guidelines through the process of bioremediation at the subject
property. Surface bioremediation has been shown to be particularly successful in
--- the San Joaquin Valley given the high temperature, and low relative humidity. This
option was particularly viable at this site since the facility has available land to treat
the soil.
The impacted soil beneath the former clarifiers responded very well to surface
bioremediation. Because the property is in a commercial/petroleum setting, there
was only a slight risk of exposure of any off site population to volatilized petroleum
hydrocarbons, and therefore very little health risk to the general public associated
with the treatment. This option was particularly attractive since on site treatment
alleviates the clients future liability for the soil.
ESE recommended that the impacted soil from beneath the former disposal pits should
be excavated to a depth of I0 feet where the site assessment indicates that the limits of
concentrations in excess of the RWQCB recommended guidelines were reached. The
soil would then be used as a dust inhibitor at the subject property.
--- EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation t6 January 29, 1993
2.2.5 S0il Excavation
Kern Environmental Services provided fr°nt end loaders, and an excavator to remove
the estimated 2,500 cubic yards of impacted soil and asphaltic sludge from the three
tank bottoms disposal pit in the rear of the .property, and 4,500 cubic yards 'of
petroleum impacted soil from the three truck wash earthen elarifiers in the central
portion of the property (Figure 2). Excavation was conducted on the days of
September 8 through September 21, 1992.
Prior to excavation, Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified 48 hours in
advance. In addition, the excavation contractor obtained necessary excavation
permits from California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal OSHA).
Petroleum impacted soils in the areas identified by the ESE Site Assessment Study
dated August 12, 1992 were removed by excavating with from end loaders, and an
excavator. The impacted soil was segregated into two swekpiles. One stockpile
consisted of 1,500 cubic yards of soil and asphaltic sludge from the tank bottoms
disposal pits. This material was thoroughly mixed with the solid asphaltic material
pulverized using a Bomag Reelaimer so that no fragment exceeds 2 1/2 inches in
diameter. This material will be applied for dust control to the rear two thirds of the
property at a thickness not to exceed three inches (Figure 2).
The second'stockpile consists of 5,500 cubic yards of petroleum impacted soil
generated from the peripheral edges of the tank bottoms disposal pits and the truck
wash earthen clarifiers. This material was placed within a remediation cell covering
the rear two thirds of the property using a rubber tire front end loader.
Excavating proceeded at the location of the tank bottoms disposal pits to a depth of 20
feet below surface grade over an area 100 feet north to south and 50 feet east to west
(Figure 2). Excavating proceeded at the location of the truck wash earthen elarifiers
to a depth of 20 feet below surface grade over an area 75 feet east to west by 40 feet
' ~ EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 17 January 29, 1993
-
north to south at the two southwestern clarifiers, and to a depth of 23 feet below
surface grade °ver an area 75 feet east to west by 40 feet north to south at the
northeastern clarifier (Figure 2). The excavation was performed so that sidewall
slopes conformed to California and Federal OSHA code requirements.
Exeavatio~t Pit Fi~.l~l Screening
During excavation soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the
excavation pit and were visually screened for the presence of petroleum
hydrocarbons. Excavation was continued, until there was no evidence in the
-, sidewalls and pit base of stained soils, or soils containing petroleum odors.
Integration of the final dimensions of the excavated pit with data collected from the
previous site characterization at the property indicated that no concentrations of
TEPH as diesel or TRPH as oil and grease in excess of 100 mg/kg should be remaining
in the subsurface. Confirmation soil samples have been collected under the direction
of a KCDEI-IS representative from the boundaries of the excavations to verify
satisfactory removal of the impacted soil.
Soil Sample (~o!l.ection
Six verification soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the tank
bottoms excavation pit at the locations shown on Figure 3. One soil sample was
collected from each of the four sidewalls at a depth of 10 feet below surface grade,
and two soil samples were collected from the base of the excavation.
Ten verification soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the
southwestern ttmck wash earthen clarifier excavation pit at the locations shown on
Figure 4. Two soil samples were collected from each of the four sidewalls at a dePth of
10 feet below surface grade, and two soil samples were collected from the base of the
excavation.
' -- EB_8228.3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 18 January 29, I993
0
Five verification soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the
northeastern truck wash earthen clarifier excavation pit at the locations shown on
Figure 4. One soil sample was collected from each of the three sidewalls (no south
-- sidewall is present due to adjacent clarifier excavation) at a depth of 10 feet below
surface grade, and two soil samples were collected from the base of the excavation.
Undisturbed soil samples were obtained by driving a modified Shelby Tube sampler
containing stainless steel sleeves with a weighted sliding hammer. The soil samples
were immediately sealed with Teflon® liners, capped, labeled, and placed on ice for
transport to a California Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified laboratory.
--- Strict chain of custody procedures were utilized for all samples collected to ensure
sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time of collection to the
final destination.
l_~boratory Analysis: Excavation Verification Soil Samples
The soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories, a State of California certified
laboratory for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons as oil and grease using
USEPA Test Method 418.1.
Anlllytic~l Results - ExcavaTion Pits
All of the six soil samples from the tank bottoms excavation were non detected for
TRPH as oil and grease. Five of the soil samples from the southwestern truck wash
earthen clarifiers were non detected for TRPH as oil and grease. One of the samples
detected TRPH as oil and grease at a concentration of 40. mg/kg. The samples from the
northeastern portion of the excavation detected TRPH as oil and grease at a
concentrations of 3,400 rog/kg, and 700 rog/kg. This corner was subsequently
excavated when the northeastern elarifier was removed. Four of the five soil
samples collected from the northeastern truck wash elarifier excavation were non
detected for TRPH as oil and grease. One of the soil samples from the northeastern
elarifier detected TRPH as oil and grease at a concentration of 20 mg/kg.
EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 19 January 29, 1993
O
Table 2 presents a summary of the analytical results for TRPH as oil and grease from
the base and sidewalls of the excavation pits:
TABLE 2. Analytical Results expressed in milligrams per kilogram.
'~ Pit.. Location DePth TRPH
Oil & Grease
8249-.1 ,, +ank Bot't0ms North Sidewall 10' .. 'ND
824972 Tani~, Bottoms Sou,th Sidewall I0' ~,ND
8249-3 Tank Bottoms , East Sidewall 10',, ND
8249-4' ~Tank Bottoms West Sidewall , 10' , ND
8249-5 Tank Bottoms Center Base 20' ND
8211.t T_a_~k Bottoms Southeast Base 12' ,ND.
8287-3 s~Uthwestern C.larifie'rs , West Base 20' 40
8287-4 Southwestern Clarifiers West Sidewall 10' ND
8287-5 Southwestern,, Clarifiers 'SoUthwest Sidewall 10' ND
8287-6 '~' Southwestern.. Clarifiers Northwest sidewall. 10' ND
8287-7 Southwestern Clarifiers East Base ,,20' ,ND
8~87-8 So. uthwestern Clarifiers East Sidewall. 10' 700*
8287-9 Southwestern Clarifiers Northeast Sidewall 10' 3,400*
8287-10 Southwestern Clarifiers .Southeast Sidewall 10' .ND
8553-I Northeastern C, larifier North Center Base 20' , ND
8553-2 Northeastern Clarifier West Sidewall 10' ND
8553-3 Northeastern Clarifier 'North Sidewall' 10' ,,ND
,8,720-2 Northe,astern Clarifier South Center Base 23'' ND
8567-1 Northeastern Clarifier, East Sidewall 10' 30
MRL NA NA NA 20
NA NA NA 100
ND: None Detected at or above minimum reporting level (MRL).
NA: Not Applicable
*' Exceeds RWQCB recommended guideline.
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guideline for contaminants in soil. The
recommended guideline was calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 100 to account for
attenuation due to soil composition and distance from groundwater.
Note: The soil in excess of the RWQCB recommended guidelines indicated in the samples from the
eastern and northeastern sidewalls of the southwestern clarifiers (8287-8 & 9) was removed with
the excavation of the northeastern Clarifier.
-' EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 20 ~anuary 29, 1993
0
B~gkfillr and Compaction
Upon review of the laboratory results, and with the approval of the KCDEHS, the
excavation pits reSUlting from soil removal were backfilled from. September 22
through October 8, 1992 with "clean~ import soil to replace the removed impacted soil.
The soil was compacted to 90% relative compaction in 12 inch lifts under the
direction of an On-site soils engineer. Compaction tests were performed at one foot
intervals from the base of the excavation to surface grade.
Backfilling was accomplished using an 815 mechanical compacter, a 966 loader, and a
water truck. A report was prepared by the 'Earth Systems' civil engineering division
which certifies that the excavation was backfilled in such a way that the compaction
exceeds 90%. This report was included as in ESE's "Report of Remedial Action", dated
October 20, 1992.
3.0 BIOREMEDIATION DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING
The 5,500 cubic yards of petroleum impacted soil excavated from the site was placed as
a one foot thick .lift over the rear two thirds of the property. The bioremedial system
utilized active mechanical cultivation by a tractor and plow combination on a
biweekly basis. A significant decrease in the concentration of the petroleum
hydrocarbons through aeration, and oxygenation was expected through the
mechanical Cultivation of petroleum hydrocarbons with the molecular weight of
diesel. A recommended treatment guideline for TEPH as diesel of 100 rog/kg was
established in conjunction with the KCDEHS.
ESE recommended that the bioremediation process be accelerated through nutrient
conditioning. This consisted of a one time application of a time released
nitrogen/phosphorous additive to establish a weight ratio of carbon:f06, nitrogen:16,
and phosphorous:l which has been shown to yield optimum biodegradation rates 'in
similar petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil. On December 1, 1992, KES applied one
pound of N:16/P:I nutrients per cubic yard of impacted soil. Application was in dry
form using a spreader and tilling into the soil. This was followed by moisture
conditioning using a water truck, and a second round of tilling.
· - EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 2 1 January 29, 1993
0
The remaining 1,500 cubic yards of asphaltic residuals from the tank bottoms pits was
thoroughly mixed with the solid asphaltic material pulverized using a Boreas
Reclaimer so that no fragment exceeds 2 1/2 inches in diameter. This material has
-- been stockpiled at the rear of the facility and will be applied for dust' control to the
rear two thirds of the property at a thickness not to exceed three inches.
4.0 PROGRESS SOIL SAMPLING
The progress of the treatment has been monitored periodically by field screening 'for
visual signs of soil discoloration, staining, and diesel odors. Two soil samples were
collected on September 23, 1992 from the initial bench scale treatment area west and
southwest of the clarifier excavation pit during the period when the excavation
process was ongoing (Figure 5). Two soil samples were collected on October I, .1992
from the bench scale area to determine is aggressive daily mechanical cultivation
had a significant effect on the bioremedial process (Figure 6). Upon completion Of
the backfilling of the excavation pits, all of the stockpiled soil was spread out over
the rear two thirds of the property. On October 23, 1992, nine soil samples were
collected from the entire treatment area after three weeks of weekly mechanical
cultivation (Figure 7). After completing five additional weeks of treatment nine
samples were collected on December 1, 1992, prior to the application of the nutrient
additive (Figure $). Mechanical cultivation and moisture conditioning continued for
six additional weeks on a biweekly basis, On January 8, 1993, nine soil samples were
again collected from the entire treatment area (Figure 9).
For each sampling event, undisturbed soil samples were obtained by driving a
modified Shelby Tube sampler containing stainless steel sleeves With a weighted
sliding hammer, immediately sealed with Teflon® liners capped, labeled, and placed
on ice for transport to a California Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified
laboratory. Strict chain of custody procedures were utilized for all samples collected
to ensure sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time of
collection to the final destination.
- ' EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith Transportation 22 January 29, 1993
5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF TREATED SOIL
The two September 23, 1992 soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories, a State of
California certified laboratory for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH)
as oil and grease by USEPA Test Method 418.1, and total extractable petroleum
hydrocarbons as diesel (TEPHd) by USEPA Test Method 8015 (modified for diesel). The
analytical reports for September 23, 1992 are included as Appendix A,
The two October 1, 1992 soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories for TRPH as oil
and grease by USEPA Test Method 418.1. The analytical reports for October 1, 1992 are
-. included as Appendix B.
The nine October 23, 1992 soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories for TEPH as
diesel by USEPA Test Method 8015 (modified for diesel). The analytical reports for
October 23, 1992 are included as Appendix C.
The nine December 1, 1992 soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories for TEPH as
diesel by USEPA Test Method 8015 (modified for diesel). The analytical reports for
December 1, 1992 are included as Appendix D.
The nine January 8, 1993' soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories for a fuel
fingerprint of the petroleum hydrocarbons by USEPA Test Method 8015 (modified for
fuel fingerprim). The analytical reports for January 8, 1993 as well as the individual
ehromatograms and sample chromatograms for Kern County diesel and crude oil are
included as Appendix E.
6.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS - TREATED SOIL
In the September 23, 1992 sampling evem, TRPH as oil and grease was detected in one
'-- soil sample at 1,700 mg/kg while TEPH as diesel was detected at 1,100 mg/kg. In the
second sample, TRPH as oil and grease was 380 mg/kg while TEPH as diesel was 200
mg/kg. Therefore, diesel hydrocarbons appeared to represent 60% of the total
petroleum hydrocarbons.
.... EB-8225-3 9301-5030.RPT
Don Keith TranSpo~ation 23 January 29, 1993
0 .
In the October I, 1992 sampling event, TRPH as oil and grease were detected in similar
locations at 1,900 mg/kg and 500 rog/kg. This appeared to indicate that daily
-- cultivation for one week had not significantly reduced the concentrations of total
petroleum hydrocarbons.
In the October 23, 1992 sampling event, TEPH as diesel was detected at concentrations
ranging from 100 mg/kg to 1,200 mg/kg .in the nine soil samples. This appeared to
indicate that slow progress was being made toward reducing the concentration of
petroleum hydrocarbons, but that a more aggressive treatment regime including
-- nutrient and moisture conditioning was warranted.
Prior to conducting the nutrient application, nine samples were collected on
December 1, 1992 and detected TEPH as diesel from 400 mg/kg to 1,000 mg/kg. The
confirmed slow progress, and supported the decision to proceed with more aggressive
treatment.
It should be noted that an internal consistency is present in the proceeding four
sampling events. Areas of the treatment cell which were initially observed to have
higher concentrations are consistently higher throughout the four sampling events
(i.e. the southwest corner had TEPH as diesel at 1,100 mg/kg on September 23, 1992,
TRPH as oil and grease at 1,900 mg/kg on October 1, 1992, TEPH as diesel at 1,100
mg/kg on October 23, 1992, and TEPH as diesel at 1,000 mg/kg on December 1, 1992).
The same consistency is present in areas of the treatment cell which were initially
observed to have lower concentrations and are consistently lower throughout the
fou~ sampling events (i.e. the southwest extension had TEPH as diesel at 200 mg/kg on
September 23, 1992, TRPH as oil and grease at 500 mg/kg on October 1, 1992, TEPH as
diesel at 400 rog/kg on October 23, 1992, and TEPH as diesel at 300 mg/kg on December
1, 1992). This consistent pattern indicates that a sampling frequency has been
established which provides representative and repeatable results.
- ' EB-8228-3 9301-5030.RPT '
Don Keith Transportation 24 January 29, 1993
0
Following six weeks of moisture conditioning after the single application of
nutrients, it was decided that a more sophisticated analytical methodology was
-- warranted. Field screening no longer indicated that lighter ~molecular weight
hydrocarbons were .present. Odors had diminished to being virtually imperceptible.
No discoloration or staining of the soil could be observed. Therefore, the nine
January 8, 1993 samples were analyzed for a fuel fingerprint.
The results eonfh'med our field observations. TEPH as diesel was not detected in any
of the nine 'samples. What is detected..are heavier molecular weight hydrocarbons
which range from 1,300 mg/kg to 2,000 mg/kg. Their chromatograms virtually
'overlay that of Kern County crude oil.
A diesel chromatogram is a bell shaped curve with retention times ranging from 11
to 22 minutes, and dominated by hydrocarbons with retention times from 13 to 18
minutes. The chromatogams of the nine samples were virtually non detected' at less
.than I5 minutes, extended to over 26 minutes, and had a dominant peak at 21 minutes.
The determination that diesel hydrocarbons are not present is particularly strong in
the interval from 11 to 15 minutes where diesel would have risen to its peak, but no
hydrocarbons are detected during these retention times in the nine samples.
Even more striking are the similarities of all nine chromatograms to each other, and
to a typical Kern County crude oil. The base of the ehromatogram have a similar
slope. The chromatograms have two peaks, one at 17.3 minutes and the second at 21.4
minutes. The tails of the chromatograms from 21.4 to 26 minutes have similar
concave shapes. The bulk of the hydrocarbons are observed between 16 and 23
minutes. There is a distinctive trough centered at approximately 20.5 minutes.' Smart
Butlxam who supervises the organic chemistry department at B C Laboratories states
that the petroleum hydrocarbons detected in the nine samples are crude oil, and as
such the presentation format of the fuel fingerprint laboratory reports are designed
to provide a signed certification of this interpretation.
EB-8228~3 9301-5030.RPT
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL. Date of
6701 MCDIVITT DRIVE, SUITE B Report: 10/27/92
._ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab %: 9603-7
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: EB-8228-1, DON KEITH TRANS.: NW-7 (SOIL) 10-23-92 ® 1325 COLLECTED
BY KEN MITCHELL
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
10/23/92 10/23/92 10/27/92
Minimum
Analysis .Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 1000. mg/kg 500.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department ~r
4100 ~@s ~---~c. · Etaker~fietrl. 0A 93~0E) · (80~-) 327-4911 · FA~ (E)Cb--) 327-191 El
~OP~TO~IES
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 MCDIVITT DRIVE, SUITE B Report: 10/27/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab #: 9603-8
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: EB-8228-1, DON KEITH TRANS.: SW-8 (SOIL) 10-23-92 @ 1329 COLLECTED
BY KEN MITCHELL
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
10/23/92 10/23/92 10/27/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 1100. mg/kg 500.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
'Department ~or
41 0~ Atlas Or. · Bakensfield, CA 933OB · (805) 327~91 I · I=~X (1905-) 327-191 8
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 MCDIVITT DRIVE, SUITE B Report: 10/27/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab %: 9603-9
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: EB-8228-1, DON KEITH TRANS.: SWEXT-9 (SOIL) 10-23-92 ® 1331
COLLECTED BY KEN MITCHELL
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. /-L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
10/23/92 10/23/92 10/26/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 400. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor'~
FAX (805) 327-1 918
Report To: -- -- Anal-~is Requested
Address: Project #: ~'~)- ~'~
Sampler Name:~
State: ~ Zip: ~her:
~hone:
Sample Description Date & Time Sampled
'U
ILl · ' · · ,eceived (Sigr Date: Time:
~ Comment: Billing Info: ~,h~
~ L_~)Q~'d:t C\. ()~, Name: Relinquished by: (Signature) eceived by: (Signat~, Date:
q- iii(__,.,., (~.,~\ f~.~,.~. Address ~'L.~ OF~/c,~:.
-...) city state Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
': \~ ~'~,~ .~_L~. Attention: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
"'7i '~) Time:
~-.. Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
APPENDIX D
LABORATORY REPORTS
AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS
DECEMBER 1, 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab #: 10722-1
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: SW, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:33AM BY K.
MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
· Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/04/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 1000. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supe rvi~r
4100A~as Or. · Baker~fielcl, CA 9330~ · (E)05) 327~4911 · F~X (805) 327-~ 918
XBO~U~TO~IES
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 10722-2
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DONKEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: SWC, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:38AM BY
K. MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample .Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/04/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 1000. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department SuperviSor
41 (DO ~cias Ct. · E)s~e~-~,elcl, C~ 9330~ · (8C]o---) 327-4911 · I~X (805-3327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
B~IKERSFIELD, .CA 93313 Lab #: '10722-3
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: SEC, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:42AM BY
K. MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/04/92
Minimum
Analysis ReportinG Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel 600. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department SuperviSor
4100 ~a, r3as Cc. · E~ske,'-~6elcl, (2~ ~ · (BO~-'] 327~4~)1 I · FAX (BCb---) 327-1
~BO~TO~IES
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab #: 10722-4
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: SE, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:47AM BY K.
MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 700. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 ·
Department Supervisor
41 OD A~as ~. · ~skersfielc~, C~ 9_q3C~ · (BO5) 327-4911 · F~X (BOb-) 327-1918
~O~TO~IES
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONI~ENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 10722-5
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. #EB-8228-3: NE, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:523%M BY K.
MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 400. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
· Department Supervi~r
4100A~as ~----~. · 5~sker~-fielc~, O~ ~3~ · (B0~) 327~)1 I · FAX (15)05) 327-1
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 10722-6
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. #EB-8228-3: NEC, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 7:57AM BY
K. MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 700. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor'
41 O0 ~r3as ~t. · ~ake,~-~e~C, CA 9330~ · (805) 327~911 · F~X [805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
_ BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93313 ' Lab #: 10722-7
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: NWC, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 8:02AM BY
K. MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 800. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
327-491 I · ;=AX (805) 327-1 91 8
~O~ATO~IE~
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
B/~KERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 10722-8
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. ~EB-8228-3: NW, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 @ 8:07AM BY K.
MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons diesel) 700. mg/kg 200.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisoz/
410C) ~OSS Ct. · E~kens~elO, C~ 93308 · (BO5) 327~491 I · F~X (leah---) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONI~ENT/%L, INC. Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 12/07/92
._ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab #: 10722-9
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRANS. #EB-8228-3: SWEXT, SAMPLED ON 12-01-92 ~ 8:12AM BY
K. MITCHELL.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
12/01/92 12/01/92 12/07/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) 300. mg/kg 200.
Note: 'High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
D epar~~
410fD~ss C~. · I~aker~--6elcl, CA 933C~ · (B(2~) 32~7-491 I · .F:AX (15105) 327-1 911SI
Repo~-To: -- -- Analysis
Address: Project
Sampler Name:
State: ~ Zip: Other:
Attn:
Phone:
Sample Description I Date & Time Sampled
-$
0757
Comment: Billing Info: by: (Si! Received ire) Time:
~..~O,\ ~ I (='('-~.~ Name: 'j~'/...~) ~,,,,~/Z~'/~ Relinquished by: (Signature) eceived by: (Signature) Date: Time:
~C~-~ ~k~.e.~-- Address
~.~..~-~ City State Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Attention:
Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Time:
Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Sample Disposal P.O.#
CI BC Disposal @ 5.00 ea. Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:'
L-I Return to client
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY REPORTS, CHROMATOGRAMS,
AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS
JANUARY 8, 1993 SAMPLING EVENT
200 , o.~
14.65
7.0~ 8
-- ' 1 I 6.''
~
0
0 5 10 15 2O 25
M i n utes
t~le. ' C'~£~..~'~DA TA ! CC~'! O00 T D26 ~nmple.' CC~/!
Z1.43
17.30
15.50
O0
_ mV .
1~17,r II I
0
.0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
~,EBO~,ATO~tE S
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-1
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NE, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:05AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed: ~
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 5 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil' None Detected mg/kg 500
Crude Oil 1300. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701' McDIVITT~ Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-1
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
· Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NE, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:05AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MAlgUAL
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
_=: 178-1X5 DaLe: Mot; Jan 18 1,3:17:24 1993
: C: \DX \METHOD \'¥F'H,me't:
ORT VOL. L!ME DIL_UTION t:::'rz~I:NTS RATE STAKT'F 'ST('3F' AF'.EA REJ'
,'hal .I. I 1.6200 LOtlz O. 0() 27.00 5000
Time Name Code
200
17.63
1 O0
'nV . z~1-43
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
~,80~qATO RIES
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-2
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NEC, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ~ 9:10AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample' Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected:' Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None 'Detected mg/kg 100
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 5 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet,Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
-Crude Oil ~ 1400. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRON-MENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT. Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-2
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NEC, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:10AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 - 300 C
· Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
1 O0 17.9o
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-3
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
-Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SE, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:15AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100.
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 5 None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
Crude Oil 1400. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
_ ~80RATORIES
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-3
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SE, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:15AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 - 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note...
Note: High repOrted PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
17.63
~ oo ~ "-'-~.~o
mV I I ~I~'A~ 21.43
0
0 5 1 0 1 5 20 25
M i n utes
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-4
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SEC, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:20AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 1.00.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 5 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500.
Crude Oil 1700. mg/kg 500.
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500.
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100.
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation SummarY
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-4
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SEC, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:20AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but' are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
C'~D~DA ~ ! !78-400T DI3 ~nmple.' ! 78-4.~'~
21.47
I
' ,~2.27
20
lOO
mM 1~6'~ ~
3.77 ~[ *
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
~,BO F~TO~I~E ~;
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-5
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SWC, sAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:25AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Coilected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mt/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mt/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected m~/k~ 100.
Heavy Naptha / Li~roin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected m~/kg 100
Gasoline None Detected mt/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected m~/kg 100
JP 5 None Detected mt/kg 100
JP ~ None Detected mt/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mt/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/k~ 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mt/kg 500
Crude Oil 1900. mg/k~ 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mt/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mt/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
_~BORATORIES
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-5
Attn.: M_ARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SWC, SDAMPLED ON 01208-93 @ 9:25AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date DaTalysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUD, L
Boiling Range: 70 - 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boilinG point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling 'range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boilinG range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
i.:!. :.~ .! ..... ' ...........................
200
7.63
0
-100
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
EPA8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONI~ENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-6
Attn.: M3~R~ K MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample~Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: N-WC, SD/~PLED ON 01-08-93 ~ 9:30AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: '
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None'Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100.
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 5 None Detected mg/kg 100.
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
Crude Oil 1900. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
~BO~b~,TORIES
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
'6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-6
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NWC, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:30AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93' 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M- DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 - 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the'pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
17.17
I
mM 100 11~'%2
-- 0
il JlJiil IllJllJJll IJllll II
0 5 10 15 2O 25
Minutes
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
.EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
-- 6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-7
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
.Sample Description: DON KEITH 'TRUCKING EB-8228-3: NW, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:35AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor'
[::.:: [,;:-..~[. i ~:'::~ i. I. i ..: :1'.:(...) 1.,'[',I i,:.,..,., ' "~" .,:: ?"., ..['~[,
I"'t.'.. ,, I:~', ' I-'. l['[[.,[::;,H)~.:;,,:::,i"~.:' i ', f.. ..,, ~,.., '! , .... i :, I ..... i "~!~ ~,:;.' i ,..Il' ~ "', ...... ~:;:il"~-..~Et f'~ 'i. . ~[,~"~,'.'~ ................. 1 I' .:-t
','.i~.h~'~ 'T' i m(~, ~ h::: m,..:..
?. [~;, ';:"(;~} .... . . . f..'r'~. ; '.'. ;';":' :[ [ 1.. ':::' ~'...., .::.
¥ ...'~ ,:'.~:, . ...'::'"'., c~ "~.. , ,",hca...... .... f.::...', ~"; ¢~r',, · · . .'i :::',':~ c",':~ % ~::'~?.
,:f::, 2': .L., - .... ~ ..~" ,"~ .... ~',¢"~,_ :[Z:.'l ' ...... I. I '"'":"?""'"'"..- ..., ......:...... 4
' ~7e.' C'ID~IDA TA I /78-700A DI~ ~an~le.' /7~-7X~
.2OO
17.92
/
· 17.14 21.45
100
mY
0
I ' ~ I I r'T-~--w I'' }' I'''' I' ~ ' ' I '
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BA/CERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-8
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
SamPle Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SW, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 ® 9:40AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units ' Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100.
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 5 'None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
Crude Oil 2000. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic 0il None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
_ EARTH sYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BA/{ERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-8
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SW, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:40AM BY
KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
~le.' C'ID.-~DA TA ! ! 7~-~00 T' D2 ! ~nmple. ' ! 7~-~-¥~ '
1 O0 . ' .5o
9.85 11.63
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification'/ Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93~00178-9
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SWEXT, S~%MPLED ON 01-08-93 ~ 9:45AM
BY KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 100.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 100.
Heavy NaDtha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 100
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 4 None Detected -mg/kg 100
JP 5. None Detected mg/kg 100
JP 6 None Detected mg/kg 100
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 100
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 100
Fuel Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
Crude Oil 1400. mg/kg 500
Hydraulic Oil None Detected mg/kg 500
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg 100
Surrogate % Recovery Not Available %
~O~TOF~I~
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL Date of
--- 6701 McDIVITT Report: 01/20/93
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 93-00178-9
._. Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE 836-0901
Sample Description: DON KEITH TRUCKING EB-8228-3: SWEXT, SAMPLED ON 01-08-93 @ 9:45AM
BY KEN MITCHELL.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
· Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed:
01/08/93 01/08/93 01/18/93
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of hydrocarbons are identified by a boiling point range and a fingerprint.
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range but do not exhibit the pattern are
quantitated versus the fuel that corresponds with the boiling range, but are qualified
with a note.
Note: High reported PQL's due to high concentration of target analytes.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
~.. ,:..~ ...lf~. ~ ...... L. '.?"" ' ~ ..., i ~:',:'; '.::i, t' ,., ...
.. i....,1~ .... ~, i ~ ! , ,r, ; i . .i ,..:11~ ;. I:.'~l ~::'~::~ (:ii ] , '.'..;!.),':? Ili.:.':>.
i:"l - r.:,:,t'. ('""P"' '""~ ...... C,..:~(.I~.::,
f.., .,? ~ ·
. -, ...... )., ,.'. ,~'~ '.;::;',..x':,;':;~,':~:0-:'~-~$0~3Zl
~ .[ ,:., .... : ...:, · .....
· <t. J. ,",... ~ .,'
..... ':' ..... ."~' :>,."l.nTM ('~ 2
5 1. 7..I. 0 : ''~ '" (''''" ' ......................
," r',O,', :-' i. ':7 ].'.,.L E::~'~ i ,.:~ .L ~::,(:~
. . . . -~ J "" ~.: .t ~'.'~-7~:,("~l-~i"'~t(.~
20O
17.63
I
i ~' ~ ~ ~ i I'-~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I~
0 5 10 15 20 25
Minutes
Re.~u,, To:
Address: ¢~¢/~ldl~ Project ~: ~--,¢~2,¢~3
City: ~ ~~ Sampler Name:~, g~
State: ~, Zip: ~3~/~ Other: o
ARm ~ ~ ~= e~ ~ z o°
Phone:
La~ Sample Description Date & Time Sampled
Comment: Billing Inf0: ~~?~ ~joiveO by:~S$~re) q Date: Time:
~ I ~',a~e c Ct,m Name: ~ ~/~ Relinquished by: (Signature) ~c~ik~ by: ~ature~- ~. '/ f Date: Tim~:
~ I~O.C~ ~' Address
%~D~'~l~ ¢.e ¢ City State Relinquished by: (Signature) Receiv~ by: (Signature) Date: Time:
~ c ~ ~., A~ention:
Relinquished by: (Signature) Re~oivod by: (Signature) Dato: Timo:
Time:
~ Milos' ~olinquishod b~: {S~naturo) ~ocoivod b~: {Signature) ~alo: limo:
Sample ~isposal ~.0.~
~ 8c ~isposal ~ 500 ea. ~olinquishod b~: (Si~naturo) ~ocoivod b~: {Si~naturo) Dato: limo:
~ ~oturn to client