The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUST 4/14/2004 HOI IZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Specialists in Site Assessment, Remedial Testing, Design and Operation April 14, 2004 Mr. John Whiting California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region 1685 E Street Fresno, California 93706-2020 Subject: Transmittal of Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report First Quarter - 2004 Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), 'Bakersfield, California Mr. Whiting: Horizon Environmental Inc. (Horizon) is forwarding the enclosed Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report dated April 14, 2004 for the above-referenced site. Please contact Horizon at (916) 939-2170 should you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely; HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Karen P. Liptak Staff Geologist Enclosure c: Mr. Rob Fishbum, Ultramar, Inc. - .-M~H~d---H.-~wine-~, III, Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Material -Dik, lslon ~ Ms. Jane Warren, Environmental Health Services Department, Kern County 5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, Suite 7 · El Dorado 'Hills, CA 95762 · (916) 939-2170 · FAX (916) 939-2172 P.O. Box 5283 · Bakersfield, CA 93388 · (661) 589-8389 · FAX (661) 589-1456 . CalifOrnia'Regional water Quality Control· BOard Central Valley Region · · Robert Schneider, Chair. · · Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretarfifor Fresno Branch-Office Governor Environmental Internet Address:- http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 ~.. Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 .. '-~ Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445~5910 13 May 2004 ~ RWQCB case No. 5T15000447 Mr. Robert Fishburn 525 W. Third Street .Hanford, CA 93232 . ' .UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE'AT BEACON STATION NO. 596, '3225 BUCK OWENS DRIVE (PIERCE ROAD), BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring, Third Quarter 2003 (Monitoring Report) dated 12 August 2003 and prepared Horizon 'Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon)i The' Monitoring Report presents data collected during a monitoring event.conducted on 15.'July 2003. RelatiVely,high: c°ncent/-ations-'0f diesel range petroleum hydrocai-bons continue t6-be detected in one monitoring well'- and are migrat!ng an unknown distance'off-site; The impacted groundWater iii(ely originates from a large mass of residual contaminated soils extending Off-site beneath the State Highway 99 fight-of-way. Hoi:izon identified six water wdlls in the Site vicinity. We previously requested.that groundwater' monitoring.c0ntinue on a Semiannual schedule beginning with the second quarter 2004 and that you attempt to sample vicinity water wells during the next monitoring event. Since.you have conducted monitoring during the. first quarter 2004, condUct the' next monitoring event during the *third quarter 2004. Vicinity water well sampling maybe conducted during the second quarter 2004 or in.conjunction with the third quarter 2004 monitoring event. A summary of the MOnitoring Report and our Comments · - follow. -'~ .. ." . · Monitoring Report Doulos Envimnmenta!, Inc'. conducted the first quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event on 14 january 2004. Depth-tO-water measurements and groundwater samples were collected' from monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-7. Depth-to-groundwater 'during the monitoring event ranged · from 27.55 .to 28.07 feet below the tops'of the casings. Horizon calculated groundwater flow direction. tO be toward the west, with a water'table sloPe of 0.007 feet per'fooi, consistent With the 15"Jul~ 2003 'irisnitorihg event.' " . """ '. ' ' ~ ". ' "/'"' " "' -" ~Groundc3ht'er samples' were S'ubmit{ed to Kiff Arihlyti~a'l,: ~aVi:s (Kiff), a haz'arddt/s'was~e l'~b¢ratory. cci'tiffed by'the State 0f-CalffomiK' 'samisle~ were anal3/zed~ fOr'tofal p~ffol~umiiyd~ocafb6'ns ~S g~is'oline · . 'California Environmental Protection'AgenCy ~' - . , ~ Recycled Paper. · '. · The energy challenge facing C~lifomi,' is r'eal. Every Californian needs to take imme'diate acti6n to reduce energy Consumption. For a Iisi of §imPle ways you ~an reduce:demand and.cut yo.m[ ~n'ergy costs, see our Web-site at ht~P://www.swrcb.ca.gi~v/rwqcb5 -' Mr. Robert Fishbum - 2 - 13 May 2004 (TPH-g) by EpA Method 8260B, total petroleum.hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) by EPA .method 8015M, and benzene,., toluene, ~ethylbenzene, xylenesi'and methyl .t~rtiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA method 8260B. The sample collected from MW-6 was also analyzed for polynuclear aromatic compoun, ds'~(?~AI-Is) byEPA Method 8310: ' TPH-g and TPH-d Were detected in MW-6 at 260 and 22,000 microgram, s per liter (p.g/L), respectively,_ this quarter. TPH-g and TPH-d were detected in MW-6 at 360 and 58,000 ~tg/L, respectively, during the 14 October 2003 (fourth quarter 2003) monitoring event. TPH-d concentrations detected in MW-6 increased from 32,000 pg/L during the .fourth quarter of 2000 to 130,000, 230,000, 180,000, and 130,000 pg/L, during the first through fourth quarters of 2001, respectively. TPH-d was detected in MW-6 at 29,000, 100,000, 45,000, 18,000, 88,000, and 14,000 pg/L during the second quarter 2002 through third quarter 2003, respectively. TPH-d was detected at 680 ~g/L in MW-7. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and MTBE were not detected. The PAHs benzo (a) anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, phenanthrene, and fluorene were det'ected in MW-6 at 8.8, 39, 2.9, 18, and 21 pg/L, respectively. In accordance with AB 2886, Kiffhas uploaded analytical data to GeoTracker. Horizon has uploaded monitoring well groundwater elevation data (GEO_WELL files). Horizon provides GEO_WELL upload confirmation sheets (screenshot) files for this quarter. Comments Relatively high TPH-d concentrations continue to be detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-6. Horizon notes that the oVerall monitoring hist°ry indicates generally decreasing TPH-d concentrations since 2001 with cOnstant groundwater elevations. Five PAH compounds were detected in the sample collected from MW-6 this quarter. The PAH benzo (a) anthracene concentration exceeded the California Drinking Water Standard Primary Maximum Contaminant Level this quarter and during the 14 October 2003 event. Impacted groundwater is migrating west to southwest an unknown distance beneath the State Highway 99 right-of-Way. The source of groundwater impact appears to be a large mass of residual impacted soil extending from the western site boundary an Unknown distance beneath the State Highway 99 right-of-way. We discussed site assessment and post-remedial data that partially ...... define.~the_ext_e_nt~of_imp acted .soils-in-our~letter4tated-2-9-May-2003~ ...... We request that groundwater monitoring continue on a semi-annual schedule. By our letter dated 22 December 2003, we requested that the next semi-annual monitoring event be conducted during the second quarter 2004. Since you conducted monitoring during the first quarter 2004 instead, we request that you perform the next semiannual monitoring event during the third quarter 2004. Groundwater samples Should be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE. The sample collected from MW-6 should also be analyzed for PAH compounds. Submit the third quarter 2004 semimmual groundwater monitoring report by 2 November 2004. Horizon's Water Supply Well Information (Well Information) dated 27 August 2003 identified six water wells and one former well within 1,500 feet ofthe'siie. Three wells could not be physically located. By our letter of 22 December 2003 we requested that you attempt to gain access to and sample the identified wells during the second quarter 2004 monitoring event. Samples shoUld be analyzed for TPH-d, TPH-g, V:\UGThUrojectskIDW_filesk2004 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\Beacon #596 GW 4-04.doc~ Mr..Robert Fishburn - 3 - 13 May 2004 BTEX, MTBE, and PAHs. We reiterate our request. You may conduct this sampling event'during the second quarter 2004 or jointly with the third quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event. ., Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwotk.'. Should youhave anyquesti0ns regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 Mr. Howard Wines 1II, Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfieli5"-~ Mr. Rexford Smith, Horizon Environmental Inc., E1 Dorado Hills File:UST/Kem County/Beacon Truck Stop No. 596/3225 Buck Owens (Pierce) Road, Bakersfield/5T15000447 V:\UG%Projects',JDW-files~2004 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases~Beacon #596 GW 4-04.doc HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Specialists in Site Assessment, Remedial Testing, Design and Operation April 14, 2004 Mr. Robert Fishburn Ultramar Inc. 685 West Third Street Hanford, California 93230 Subject: Quarterly 'Groundwater Monitoring First Quarter 2004 Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California Mr.' Fishbum: Horizon Environmental Inc. (Horizon) has prepared this report which documents the results of first quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring at the subject site located in Kern County (Figure 1). There are currently three groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5, MW-6, and MW-7) associated with this site as shown on Figure 2. Doulos Environmental Company (Doulos) performed groundwater monitoring activities on January 14, 2004 according to Ultramar Inc. (Ultramar) Field Procedures (Attachment A). Groundwater Monitoring The depth to groundwater was measured to the nearest 0.01 foot from the top-of-casing (TOC) and groundwater samples were collected from groundwater monitoring' wells MW-5, MW-6 and MW-7. Doulos Sampling Information Sheets and Horizon Environmental Inc. Sampling Information Sheets are contained in Attachment B. The groundwater samples were submitted, under chain-of-custody (COC) documentation, to Kiff Analytical LLC (Kiff), a California Department of Health Services-certified analytical laboratory (ELAP No. 2236) located in Davis, California. Groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) modified Method 8015, total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), the volatile aromatic compounds, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX) and the fuel oxygenate methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8260B. The monitoring well MW-6 sample was also analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by EPA Method 8310. Results of Groundwater Monitoring Depth-to-groundwater measurements were subtracted from the surveyed TOC elevations to calculate groundwater elevations as summarized in Table 1. Groundwater elevation data were used to construct a groundwater contour map as shown on Figure 2. The first quarter 5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, Suite 7 · El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 · (916) 939-2170 · FAX (916) 939-2172 P.O. Box 5283 · Bakersfield, CA 93388 · (661) 589-8389 * FAX (661) 589-1456 Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) April 14, 2004 Bakersfield, California Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring 2004 data indicates a westward groundwater floTM direction, under a gradient of approximately 0.007. Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Groundwater elevations and TPHd concentrations for monitoring well MW-6 are graphed against time in Figure 3. The graph shows generally decreasing TPHd concentrations since 2001 while groundwater elevations have remained relatively constant. The analytical reports are included as Attachment C. A summary table of historical groundwater data is included as Attachment D. GeoTracker Electronic Data Deliverables The analytical electronic data deliverable (EDD) was uploaded by Kiff. The groundwater well measurement file EDD (GEO_WELL) for this quarterly monitoring event was uploaded by Horizon. The GEO_WELL upload confirmation sheet is contained in Attachment E. Distribution A copy of this report should be forwarded to: Mr. John D. Whiting Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 1685 E Street Fresno, California 93706-2020 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Material Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Ms. Jane M. Warren Environmental Health Services Department Kern County 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 - 2370 596qmrQ104.doc Project No. 1596.45 2 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) April 14, 2004 Bakersfield, California Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring If you have any questions, please contact Horizon at (916) 939-2170. Sincerely, HORIZON ENVIRONMENTA~~ Rexford Smith ~,,~ jo_._s,,?~z,. /..,r/ Registered Geologist No. 5307 ~.~r-~ ~°~ff~/ Karen P. Liptak Staff Geologist Attachments: Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site Map / Groundwater Elevation Contour Map Figure 3: TPHd Concentration and Groundwater Elevation vs. Time Table 1: Groundwater Monitoring Data Table 2: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Analytical Results Attachment A: Ultramar Field Procedures Attachment B: Doulos Groundwater Data and Sampling Information Sheets Attachment C: Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Document Attachment D: Historical Groundwater Data Attachment E: GEO WELL Electronic Data Deliverable Confirmation Sheet 596qmrQ 104.doc Project No. 1596.45 3 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. NORTH Source: U.S.G.S. 7-1/2 Minute Topographic Map Oildale, California ~ Photorevised 1958 0 2,000 4,000 Scole In Feet HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 81TE VICINITY MAP ~ i BEACON STATION NO. 596 1 Project Numbe~. 15~e.01 0fawn B~. O. Nmton 3225 PIERCE ROAD PrePared B~..G. Bed(er O~to: 4/95 BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA Re~ed B~. Rr~dled O~te: GENERATOR i .... i~/ /,.' - ' ....~ .... SHED ~-~.. !! '- ..... ',i ..... 17 ........... . ~ ............... ~ " ~ ~ ~ TRUCK ~ '~ ~ MW-2 SCALE MW-1 TRASH ..... ~ , BIN .... -.~ ~;~ ~ VE~ ~[ DISPENSER VE~ ~ IS~NDS ~ VE-7 " ~ UNLEADED ~ ~ e(379.44) ~ '-- GASOLINE USTE.~ ........ ~ J, .~, ,,~ ~ ~ .... ~--11~ ~,~,o. ',,, ~.~ J ~ J~ COMPOUND ~ REP~CEMENT ~,so~,.~ ~s~s ~-... ~ : L_i~ ~RMER ~ DIESEL USTS ~ TRUCK ~ ~ (37965) WASH ' APPROXIMATE PROPER~ BOUNDARY LEGEND: ~ MW-7 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ~LL ~ MWA DESTROYED GROUNDWATER MONITORING ~LL ~ VE-8 DESTROYED VAPOR EXTRACTION~LL % PRE-SET T~FFIC BOXES (379.65) GROUND WATER ELEVATION IN FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL ~379.4~ WATER TABLE CONTOUR IN FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL ~ GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION NM NOT MEASURED 0 50 FT DATE MEASURED: 1114/04 APPROX. SCALE SOURCE: FIGURE MODIFIED FROM DRAWING PROVIDED BY ULTRAMAR ~ Fi~VIRO~!V[E~'TA[. I~C SITE MAP/GROUNDWATER I __ ' i FIGURE ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP - Project Number: 1596.45 I Drawn By: M. LaCoste BEACON STATION NO. 3074 ! 2 Prepared By: K. Liptak i Date: 2/17/04 3225 BUCK OWENS DR. Reviewed By: R. Smith I Revised Date: BAKERSFIELD, CA. ~ I FIGURE 3 Monitoring Well MW-6 TPHd Concentration and Groundwater Elevation vs. Time Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California 250,000 395 390 200,000 E 385 "& = 150,000 ~' u 380 > o iii 'o 100,000 '~ I- 375'~ 50,000 370 0 : 365 Date [ -~-- TPHd Concentration ~ Groundwater Elevation J 596PNAs.xls Project No. 1596.45 TABLE 1 GrOundwater Monitoring Data' Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakemfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) Comments :,,,:::It~N~~: ':1; 07/29/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 15.94 100.11 84,17 no odor, no sheen ~$~r~e~d 12/03/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 16.67 83.44 ~i~i~ 02/03199 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 17.43 82.68 i~i!;:!~i :i~!"* " 05/11/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.04 82.07 09/15/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.13 81.98 12/28/99 <50 <50 .<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.96 81.15 ~; ~,': ~:~i:i? ;;, ~ 01/26/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 19.82 80.29 06/16/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 20.54 79.57 09/13/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.18 78.93 clear 11/02/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 22.02 78.09 clear 03/01101 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 25.95 74.16 clear ~;': ~?',~; =,',~:~:i 04/25/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 26.36 73.75 clear ~= i~ 7:i;ili~ ~':!:!~'; 07/26/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.31 71.80 clear 10/24/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.05 71.06 clear :!, ':: ;:i:::~;: I 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 406.05 GeoTracker survey 01/22/02 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.19 378.86 clear 04~23~02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 26.65 379.40 clear ::~i2:1:i ! 07/29/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 16.41 100.00 83.59 no odor. no sheen i~ 12/03/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 17.03 82.97 i~:.~'~:~: .. , 02/03/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 17.79 82.21 ,30~0~i~ 05/11/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.42 81.58 ~ ?,:~, ~ 09/15/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.57 81.43 !;~;??~: ::iiii 12/28/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 19.27 80.73 ~:i :':: ~:: :~ <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 20.16 79.84 ~=¥~:~: ~:: ::~1 01/26/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 06/16/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.10 78.90 09/13/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.80 78.20 ~"~:~:~';= :~ <0.50 <5.0 22.57 77.43 clear ::.:.~r~',~:.~:~:: 11/02/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 :~: ~: ~?~:~': 03/01/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 26.33 73.67 clear 04/25/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 26.91 73.09 clear ,~ -.~,:: ::::, :~, ~ ~, 07/26/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.96 71.04 clear :,: /!::~::~¥¥'; 10/24/01 <50 <50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.56 70.44 clear 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 405.91 GeoTracker survey 01/22/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 28.11 377.80 clear ?~':i :;::: !!~ i, 04/23/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 27.26 378.65 clear 06/10/02 .................. well destroyed 596qmr. xls Page 1 of 7 HOI~3ON ~-t~'][~Ot~r~]S~?A~ t31C. 1596.45 TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakemfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) = Comments ~.~ ...... ~ 07/29/98 ' <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 16.63 100.70 84.07 no odor. no sheen sc~ned 12/03/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 17.31 83.39 ~ i~i}'l 02/03/99 <50 <SO <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.10 82.60 ~::;,::,1:~1~,'1~¥ 05/11/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.75 81.95 09115199 <50 170 <0.50 <0.50 ' <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.85 81.85 12128199 <50 <50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 19.68 81.02 !::::: i~,,~i ~, (}~},~; 01/26/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 20.57 80.13 '~, ~,~ ? ~J~j?/ 06/16/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.16 79.~ ~,~,~ 09/13/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.71 78,99 11/02/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 22.70 78.00 clear ~::;~ :~:: ::: ~: 03/01/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 26.83 73.87 clear ~:~;': ~}: :~,~ :~: ~}:~ ~ 04/25/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.13 73.57 clear 07/26/01 <50 <50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.08 71.62 clear ~ ~:: ~(~:::: ;~ 10/24/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 30.05 70.65 clear 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 406.65 GeoTracker su~ey ..... 01/22/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 28.01 378.~ not sampled ~::::~;~ ':~ 04~23~02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 27.53 379.12 not sampled : 06/10/02 ................ welt destroyed 596qmr.xls 15~.4s Page 2 of 7 ~]O1~[30~l ~-t~v'II~ONMISN'I'A[, I]~C. TABLE l Groundwater Monitoring Data Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakemfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) Comments ::~,It~N-5:::07/29/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 17.62 101.38 83.76 no odor, no sheen ~i 12/03/98 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.22 83.16 i;ii~a 02/03/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.99 82.39 ~2!~:i- 05111/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 19.70 81.68 09/15/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 19.87 81.51 12/28/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 20.63 80.75 01/26/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 21.54 79.84 06/16/00 <50 <50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 22.17 79.21 09/13/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 22.67 78.71 11/02/00 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 23.75 77.63 clear 03/01/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.98 73,40 clear 04/25/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28,28 73.10 clear :: :::~ 07/26/01 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 30.38 71.00 clear 10/24/01 <50 310 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 31.46 69.92 clear ~=:,~,~:~:~:~;~=::~ 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 407.18 GeoTracker survey ; !~=~j: ~..~ 01/22/02 nS ns ns ns ns ns ns 29,45 377.73 not sampled ~ ~ ;~!~ 04~23~02 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.88 378.30 clear 07/24/02 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.87 378.31 clear ?:=~:~;;;~ 10/15/02 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.55 378.63 clear =; =:~;: = ~;~ :~ ;:~ <0.50 <5.0 27.58 379.60 clear 01/16/03 <50 <50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 04/16/03 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.48 378.70 clear ,.~ ~ ¥~ :::: 07/15/03 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.80 378.38 clear 10/14/03 <50 60 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.45 379.73 clear 01/14/04 <50 <50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.53 379.65 dear 596qmr,xls Page 3 of 7 HORIZON ~'-NVIRONMENTAL INC. 596.45 TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road),.Bakemfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) Comments 'i~;~,~',! ~ ,~ 07~29~98 710 150000 0.74 0.62 0.53 1.6 <5.0 17.87 101.26 83.39 odor. no sheen 12/03/98 140 63000 0.54 0.76 <0.50 0.74 <5.0 18.42 82.84 ~ 02/03/99 150 46000 1.3 <0.50 <0.50 1.5 <5.0 19.20 82.06 ite~l 05/11/99 4100 86000 <0.50 <0.50 <0,50 0.85 <5,0 19.89 · 81.37 i ~=!~:!! 09/15/99 650 74000 1.3 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 20.03 81.23 ~' <0.50 0.60 <5.0 20.79 80.47 12/28/99 860 28000 0.51 0.50 ;~-~;~'::';, 06/16/00 3800 18000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 22.43 78.83 sheen ;: iii,:ii 09/13/00 720 22000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 23.03 78.23 ~':~ ; 11/02/00 2600 32000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 24.03 77.23 clear ;=~:~::;:::::; 03/01/01 1100 130000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.92 <5.0 28.10 73.16 clear ~;=:~!~;:~:';::: 04/25/01 2500 230000 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 0.87 <5.0 28.54 72.72 clear 07/26/01 2900 180000 1.1 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 30.69 70,57 clear ;.':~;=;:::~-:: 10/24/01 750 130000 1.3 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <5.0 31,64 69.62 clear ~!: 407.18 GeoTracker survey '~== =,~ ~ ....... 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 01/22/02 4500 60000 0.60 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.86 377.32 cloudy 04/23/02 1700 29000 0.72 <0.50 <0.50 0.60 <5.0 29.14 378.04 cloudy 07/24/02 330 100000 1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5,0 29.30 377.88 cloudy 10/15/02 390 45000 0.60 <0.50 <0.50 0.85 <5.0 28.92 378.26 cloudy ~ !i.~;~; ~ 01/16/03 390 18000 0.54 <0.50 <0.50 0.74 <5.0 28.06 379.12 cloudy ~:,i;~:ili;;[:: ~ 04/16/03 400 88000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.69 <5.0 28.87 378.31 clear 07/15/03 250 14000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.30 377.88 cloudy i i' ~ i 10/14103 360 58000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.73 <5.0 27.94 379.24 clear ~,~%~:=~ 01114/04 260 22000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.07 379.11 clear 596qmr.xls Page 4 of 7 HORIZON ]~NVIItONI~I~NTAL INC. 1596.45 TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data ' Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) Comments 07~29/98 270 1800 2.4 <0.50 1.2 2.7 140 17.79 101.42 83.63 no odor, no sheen 12/03/98 280 480 4.7 <0.50 2.9 5.6 110 18.37 83.05 ~:~n~ 02/03/99 <50 70 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.0 31 18.15 83.27 ~ i~t~i?'~' 05/11/99 620 <500 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 3.6 6.8 19.81 81.61 :):i~t~i!;ii---;';;" 09/15/99 1200 <500 1.2 <0.50 <0.50 6.3 62 19.92 81.50 12/28/99 1800 <500 1.4 0.62 0.71 3.8 13020.71 80.71 01126100 2100 <2000 1.6 <0.50 0.61 87 21.60 79.82 · ';~ ~i?;!. !~!' <0.50 3.8 11 6.8 22.37 79.05 = 06/16/00 1800 2500 <0.50 ~;!~!~;~,,,i~,;;~,,, 09/13/00 1300 1400 <0.50 <0.50 0.79 4.6 <5.0 22.98 78.44 ;~ ~?~; ;:~: 77.53 clear ~;~ ~;~:~;~;~;~:; 11/02/00 460 530 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 23.89 03/01/01 78 610 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.85 73.57 clear 04/25/01 <50 650 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.34 73.08 clear = ~ ;;= :~;: ~ ~;~?;~ 07/26/01 <50 320 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 30.37 71,05 clear ;:~:~ ;~ ;::;;:;: 10/24/01 <50 320 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 31.22 70.20 dear 11/18/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 407.33 GeoTracker su~ey 01/22/02 <50 660 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0,50 <5.0 29.52 377.81 clear : ~:?:;~ ;¥:~ 04/23/02 410 140 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.79 378.54 clear ~ ~¥: ~ 07/24/02 <50 2700 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <5,0 28.97 378.36 dear ~; ?~ :~==~ ~?~ 10/15/02 <50 300 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28,61 378.72 clear :~ =:~; 04/16/03 <50 250 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.64 378.69 clear 01/16/03 <50 1600 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.79 379.54 clear 07/15/03 <50 380 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.08 378.25 clear 10/14/03 <50 340 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.76 379.57 clear 01/14/04 <50 680 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 27.89 379.44 clear ::~:~;,:~ 04/26/01 <50 7000 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 28.50 407.14 378.~ no odor/no sheen %~;;:~:; ::~==~.~,~a;~ 09/24/01 <50 240 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 29.91 377.23 no odoflno sheen =~ 10124/01 <50 100 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 30.74 376.40 no odor/no sheen :i~a[~: 01/22/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 29.13 378.01 not sampled ~ :,~1 04/23/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 28.37 378.77 not sampled ? ~: ?)~(~;~[;?~ 06/10/02 ............... well destroyed 5~6qmr. xls Page 5 of 7 HORIZON ENVII~ONMENTAL INC. 1596.45 TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California Depth TOC GW Well I TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzenexylenes MTBE to GW Elevation ElevationI Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl), Comments :i ==VE-6=i 05/11/99 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 18.93 nm nm iil;Li. 09/15/99 'ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 19.04 nm scree~ 12128/99 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm '::::: '1:: .... ~ '~ 01126100 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 0-20 :',.: 06116/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry ;,i~!i;';i~ ~i~,;;~, 09/13/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry :~,~;?~.: 11102/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry ~:: :' ~ : ::~'~%::~ 03/01/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 04/25/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry :: ~$~ 07/26/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry ::: :::::~:.:::~::~: 10/24101 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 01/22/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry iii::i:i::i ::?, 04123102 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry :?i:: ;,¥;,:::,: ii:' : 06/10/02 ................... well destroyed ?:;VE~/~, 01/26/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm nm not sampled :./:.i.:: !:ii, i;;:; 06/16/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry i~ 09/13/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry "J~i.i 11/02/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ ~ ~40~2~ ::;;~ 03/01/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ ~;~ ~.;~:: 04/25/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm .... ~:~::~'~:~':~::~A 07/26/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ ~:?~:~::F~;: ~;~ 10/24/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ ..... :: ::-~ 01122102 ns ns ns . ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ 04~23~02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm d~ ....... : 06/10/02 ................ well destroyed 596qmr. xls Page 6 of 7 }[O~.[30~ ~-I~v'~I~O]~I~[IS~?A[, [~C. 1596,45 TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring Data Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California Depth TOC GW Well TPHg TPHd benzene toluene ethylbenzenexylenes MTBE to GW Elevation Elevation Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (feet) (feet msl) (feet msl) Comments i!'ii ~! 01/26/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm nm not sampled 06/16/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry S~¢~ 09/13100 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry i~,ii~i:I 11102/00 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry ~=~! 0,20 ~-., 03/01/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry =~ '::::'~ ,,'='~ 04/25/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm · dry 07/26/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 10/24/01 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 01/22/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry 04123/02 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns nm nm dry ~:~:; =::~=;;i'!~ 06/10/02 ................... well destroyed Notes: TPHg = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline ppb = parts per billion TPHd = total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel < = less than indicated detection level MTBE = methyl tert-butyl ether nm = not measured GW = groundwater ns = not sampled TOC = top of casing msl = mean sea level 596qmr. xls ~596.45 Page 7 of 7 I-IORI~ON ~,NVII~OI~ff, NTAI, INC. TABLE 2 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS ANALYTICAL RESULTS Beacon Station No. 596 (Truck Stop 3074) 3225 Buck Owens Drive (Pierce Road), Bakersfield, California benzo (a)- Well acenaphthene acenaphthylene anthracene flourene flouranthene phenanthrene pyrene Number Date (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) i;'~ MW~i~04/23/02 na na na na na na na ,,~:~::,~,,:,~: ~ 01/16/03 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 10/14/03 na na na na na na na 01/14/04 na na na na na na na : ::MW~i J: 04/23/02 < 10 < 10 < 10 27 < 10 44 < 10 10/14/03 <1.0 2.2 4.2 <1.0 3.2 <1.0 <1.0 ~;~:;;~; ~:~ 01 / 14/04 < 1.0 < 1.0 8.8 21 39 18 2.9 ~MW~7:: 04/23/02 na na na na na na na :~ 01/16/03 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 10/14/03 na na na na na na na 01/14/04 na na na na na na na Notes: ppb = parts per billion na = not analyzed < = less than indicated reporting limit 596PNAs,xls Project No. 1596.45 Page 1 of 1 HO]~J:~_,OI~ ]~IVV"i:R. ONIV[E~N'I'A/, I1~C. ATTACHMENT A ULTRAMAR FIELD PROCEDURES ATTACHMENT A - ULTRAMAR FZELD PROCEDURES The following section describes procedures used by field personnel in the performance of ground water sampling at Ultramar Inc. sites. Ground Water Level and Total .Depth Determination A water level indicator is lowered .down the well and a measurement of the depth to water from an established reference point on the casing is taken. The indicator probe is used to sound the bottom of the well and a measurement of the total depth of the well is taken. Both the water level and total depth measurements are taken to the nearest 0.0~.-foot. Visual Analysis of Ground Water Prior to purging and sampling ground water monitoring wells, a water sample is collected from each well for subjective analysis. The visual analysis involves gently lowering a clean, disposable, polyethylene bailer to approximately one-half the bailer length past the water table interface. The bailer is then retrieved, and the sample contained within the bailer is examined for floating product or the appearance of a petroleum product sheen. If measurable free product is noted in the bailer, a water/product interface probe is used to determine the thickness of the free product to the nearest 0.01-foot. The thickness of free product is determined by subtracting the depth to product from the depth to water. Monitoring Well Purging and Sampling Monitoring wells are purged by removing approximately four casing volumes of water from the well using a clean disposable bailer or electrical submersible purge pump. Purge volumes are calculated prior to purging. During purging, the temperature, pM, and electric conductivity of the purge water are monitored. The well is considered to be sufficiently purged when: The four casing volumes have been removed; the temperature, pM, and conductivity values have stabilized to within ~.0*/o of the initial readings; and the ground water being removed is relatively free of suspended solids. After purging, ground water levels are allowed to stabilize to within 80% of the initial water level reading. A water sample is then collected from each well with a clean, disposable polyethylene bailer. If the well is bailed or pumped dry prior to removing the minimum volume of water, the ground water is allowed to recharge. If the well has recharged to within 80*/0 of the initial depth to water reading within two hours, the well will continue to be purged until the minimum volume of water has been removed. If the well has not recharged to at least 80% of the initial depth to water reading within two hours, the well is considered to contain formational water and a ground-water sample is collected. Ground water removed from the well is stored in 55-gallon drums at the site and labeled pending disposal. In wells where free product is detected, the wells will be bailed to remove the free product. An estimate of the volume of product and water well be recorded. If the free product thickness is reduced to the point where a measurable thickness is no longer present in the well, a ground water sample will be collected. If free product persists throughout the purging process, a final free product thickness measurement will be taken and a ground water sample will not be collected. Ground water samples are stored in 40-milliliter vials so that air passage through the sample is minimized (to prevent volatilization of the sample). The vial is tilted and filled slowly until an upward convex meniscus forms over the mouth of the'vial. The Teflon'" side of the septum (in cap) is then placed against the meniscus, and the cap is screwed on tightly. The sample is then inverted and the bottle is tapped lightly to check for air bubbles. If an air bubble is present in the vial, the cap is removed and more sample is transferred from the bailer. The vial is then resealed and rechecked for air bubbles. The sample is then appropriately labeled and stored on ice from the time of collection through the time of delivery to the laboratory. The Chain-of-Custody form is completed to ensure sample integrity. Ground water samples are transported to a state-certified laboratory and analyzed within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-specified hold times for the specified analytes. ATTACHMENT B DOULOS GROUNDWATER DATA AND SAMPLING INFORMATION SHEETS DOULOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. GROUNDWATERfLIQLrlI) LEVEL DATA (measurements in feet) Project Address: Beacon it 3074 3225 Pierce Rd. Pierce Rd. '~ Date: ]-/l/- Oq Bakersfield· Ca. Project No.: 3074-68 Recorded by:. r7 6' ff,., ~Q Well No. Time ·Well Elev. Depth to Measured Groundwater Depth to product ""- Comments TOC Groundwater Total D~ Elevation Product Thickness ,q w- 7 72¢ ~- ¢. ~ 3ti, 15 Notes: DOULOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. SAMPLING INFORMATION SHEET Client: Ultra_mar Sampling Date: Site: Beacon #3074 Project.No.:. 3225 Pierce Rd. '-Well Designation: Bakersfield, Ca. Is setup of traffic control devices required? ~ YES time: hours Is there standing water in the well box?'1~ YES Above TOC Below TOC Is top of casing cut level? NO ~ If no, see remarks Is well cap sealed and locked? NO~ If no, see remarks Height of well casing riser (in inches): Well cover type: 8" or 12" UV 12" EMCO 8" or 12" BK 8" Christy.~ 12" Christy 8" M&D 12" M&D 12" DWP 12" CNI 36" CNI ~ 12" Pomeco~ Other: ~ General condition of wellhead assembly: Excellent Good )F Fair Poor~ Purging Equipment: 2" disposable bailer ~/ Submersible pump 2" PVC bailer Dedicated bailer 4" PVC bailer Centrifugal pump Sampled with: DispOsable bailer Teflon bailer Disposable Tubing Well Diameter: 2" 4" '~' 6" 8" Purge Vol. Multiplier: 0.16 0.65 1.47 2.61 gal/ft. Initial Measurement . Recharge Measurement Time: r/L.r ' Time: ~O/.~ Calculated purge: Depth ofwelh ~ ~, .*.~' Depth to water: "z..~'%- Actual purge: Depth to water: 1.~' Start purge: ~or'O Sampling time: Time Temperature E.C. pH Turbidity Volume ,, 7,56 6 Sample appearance: C~'~-' LoCk: Equipment replaced: (check all that apply) Note condition of replaced item(s) 2" Locking Cap: Lock:. 7/32 Allenhead: 4" Locking Cap: Lock-Dolphin: 9/16 Bolt: 6" Locking Cap: Pinned Allenhead (DWP): Remarks: Signature: ~~~~.~ DOULOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. SAMPLING INFORMATION SHEET Client: Ultrarnar Sampling Date: Site: Beacon #3074 Project No.' 3225 Pierce Rd. Well Designation: Bakersfield, Ca. Is setup of u'affic conu'ol devices required? q~ YEs time: hours Is there standing water in the well box?~9' ~ Above TOC Below TOC Is top of casing cut level?~S If no, see remarks Is well cap sealed and locked? NO If no, see remarks Height of well casing riser (in inches): /4' Well cover type: 8" or 12" UV 12" EMCO~ -8" or 12" BK 8" Christy 12" Christy.~ 8" M&D~ 12" M&D~ 12" DWP ~ 127 CNI ~' 36" CNI · 12" Pomeco Other: ~ 1~ G~n~ral con&fi'~" 'on of wellhead assembly: Exeellent~ Oood~_ Fail' Poor Purging Equipment: 2" disposable bailer y Submersible pump 2" PVC bailer Dedicated bailer 4" PVC bailer Centrifugal pum,,p Sampled with: Disposable bailer Teflon bailer Disposable Tubing Well Diameter: 2" )~ 4" 6"' 8" Purge Vol. Multiplier: 0.16 0.65 1.47 2.61 gal/fL Imtial Measurement . Recharge Measurement Time: r]',t /4 'Time: ~3'"'1 Calculated purge: Depth to water: Start purge: ~" ~ ,2.. Sampling time: ~'ime Temperature E.C. pH Turbidit7 Volume Sample appearance: ~.;..a~ ~ Lock: Equipment replaced: (check all that apply) Note condition of replaced item(s) 2" Locking Cap: Lock:. 7/32 Allenhead: 4" Locking Cap: Lock-Dolphin: 9/16 Bolt: 6'" Locking Cap: Pinned Allenhead (DW'P): Remarks: DOULOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. SAMPLING INFORMATION SHEET Client: Ultra_mar Sampling Date: }" ] Site: Beacon #3074 Project No.: 3225 Pierce Rd. Well Designation: Bakersfield, Ca. is setup of traffic control devices required? N~ yE~ time: hours Is there standing water in the well box? Above TOC Below TOC Is top of casing cut level? If no, see remarks Is well cap sealed and locked? NO If no, see remarks Height of well casing riser (in inches): Well cover type: 8" or 12" UV 12" EMCO~ 8" or 12' BK 8" Christy,~ 12" Christy~ 8" M&D 12" M&D 12" DWP · 12" CNI 36" CNI ~ 12" Pomeco Other: General condition of wellhead a~sembly: Excellent Good ,-~ Fair Poor Purging Equipment: 2" disposable bailer -~ Submersible pump 2" PVC bailer Dedicated bailer 4" PVC bailer Centrifugal pur~,p Sampled with: Disposable bailer Teflon bailer. Disposable Tubing Well Diameter: 2" 4" ~.6 6" 8" Purge Vol. Multiplier: 0.16 5 1.47 2.61 gal/it. Initial Measurement . Recharge Measurement Time: 7'L~ .. ' Time: _~- ~ Calculated purge: / Depth of well: ;~ 14,15' Depth to water: }.-~"~lt~ Actual purge: /& Depth to water: '1.?~ Start purge: ~'/,~.. Sampling time: tl Time Temperature E.C. pH Turb;idit¥volume ~/~ ~'.q, ~ £~-, .7~'2._ - .. ,-. , ~ 6~r,/ ~-r~- , ~ 3 8-~. 2. ~s,r',! , ~ 7"1 l */,7 !----__ S mP , pp r no : Equipment replaced: (check all that apply) Note condition of replaced item(s) 2" Locking Cap: Lock: 7/32 Allenhead: 4" Locking Cap: Lock-Dolphin: 9/16 Bolt: 6"' Locking 'Cap: Pinned Allen.head (DWP): Remarks: ATTACHMENT C ANALYTICAL REPORTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENT Report Number' 36707 Date · 1/22/2004 ANALYTICAL u.c Rex Smith Horizon Environmental 5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, Suite 7 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Subject: 3 Water Samples Project Name: Beacon Project Number: 3074 Bakersfield P.O. Number: 3074-70 Dear Mr. Smith, Chemical analysis of the samples referenced above has' been completed. Summaries of the data are contained on the following pages. Sample(s) were received under documented chain-of-custody. US EPA protocols for sample storage and preservation were followed. Kiff Analytical is certified by the State of California (# 2236). If you have any questions regarding procedures or results, please call me at 530-297-4800. Since?y, [ J~,,~hl : 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 ~ ~F~ Report Number' 36707 Date · 1/22/2004 I ANALYTICAL/./,c Project Name: Beacon Project Number: 3074 Bakersfield Sample: MW-5 Matrix: Water Lab Number: 36707-01 Sample Date :1/14/2004 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene . < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Toluene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Ethylbenzene < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Total Xylenes < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 5.0 5.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 TPH as Gasoline < 50 50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 100 % Recovery EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 93.1 % Recovery EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 TPH as Diesel < 50 50 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/20/2004 Octacosane (Diesel Surrogate) 92.7 % Recovery M EPA 8015 1/20/2004 Sample: MW-6 Matrix: Water Lab Number: 36707-02 Sample Date :1/14~2004 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Toluene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Ethylbenzene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Total Xylenes < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 5.0 5.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 TPH as Gasoline 260 50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 100 % Recovery EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 93.2 % Recovery EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 TPH as Diesel 22000 50 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/18/2004 Octacosane (Diesel Surrogate) 99.2 % Recovery M EPA 8015 1/18/2004 Approved By: 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297~41~(~0 ¢ ~FF Report Number' 36707 Date · 1/22/2004 I ANALYTICAL LLC Project Name · Beacon Project Number' 3074 Bakersfield Sample: MW-7 Matrix: Water Lab Number: 36707-03 Sam pie Date :1/14~2004 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0.50 0.50 'ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Toluene < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Ethylbenzene < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Total Xylenes < 0,50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 Methyl-t-butyl ether {MTEIE) < 5,0 5.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 TPH as Gasoline < 50 50 ug/L EPA 8260B. 1/18/2004 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 100 %Recovery EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 92.3 % Recovery EPA 8260B 1/18/2004 TPH as Diesel 680 50 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/18/2004 Octacosane (Diesel Surrogate) 99.7 % Recovery M EPA 8015 1/18/2004 Approved By: 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29 ,7~4/8~0 Report Number: 36707 QC Report: Method Blank Data Date: 1/22/2004 Project Name: Beacon Project Number: 3074 Bakersfield Method Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed TPH as Diesel ¢ 50 50 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/17/2004 Octacosane (Diesel Surrogate) 93.5 % M EPA 8015 1/17/2004 TPH as Diesel < 50 50 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/19/2004 Octacosane (Diesel Surrogate) 82.2 % M EPA 8015 1/19/2004 Benzene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Toluene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Ethylbenzene < 0.50 0.50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Total Xylenes ¢ 0.50 0.50 uglL EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 5.0 5.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/1712004 TPH as Gasoline < 50 50 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 Toluene - d8 (Surf) 100 % EPA 8260B 1/17/2004 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Sun') 93.7 % EPA 8260B 1117/2004 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC Approved By: 2795 2nd St. Suite 300 Davis. CA 95616 530-297-4800 Report Number' 36707 OC Report: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Date · 1/22/2004 Project Name- Beacon Project Number- 3074 Bakersfield ~Dup, lic,ate Spiked Duplic,ate Spiked ~piKea -,. Sample Relative Spike Spiked Sp~kea Sample Sample _Re~advePercent Percent Spiked Sample Spike Dup. Sample Sample Analysis Date Percent Percent Percent Recov. Diff. Parameter Sample Value Level Level .Value Value Units Method Analyzed Recov. Recov. Diff. Limit Limit TPH as Diesel Blank <50 1000 1000 806 1000 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/17/04 80.6 100 21.8 70-130 25 TPH as Diesel Blank <50 1000 1000 983 1070 ug/L M EPA 8015 1/19/04 98.3 107 8.56 70-130 25 Benzene 36707-01 <0.50 40.0 40.0 47.3 46.9 ug/L EPA8260B 1/17/04 118 117 0,786 70-130 25 Toluene 36707-01 <0.50 40.0 40.0 46.2 46.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 116 115 0.564 70-130 25 Tert-Butanol 36707-01 <5.0 200 200 207 202 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 103 101 2,60 70-130 25 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether36707-01 <0.50 40.0 40.0 42,7 42.9 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 107 .107 0.468 70-130 25 2795 2nd St, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 Report Number' 36707 QC Report: Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Date' 1/22/2004 Project Name' Beacon Project Number· 3074 Bakersfield LCS LCS Percent Spike Analysis Date Percent Recov. Parameter Level Units Method Analyzed Recov. Limit Benzene 40.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 116 70-130 Toluene 40.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 114 70-130 Tert-Butanol 200 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 99.8 70-130 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether 40.0 ug/L EPA 8260B 1/17/04 106 70-130 97QR ')nd ~f ~,~if'" clrlrl r'l~Jti,~ r~A QRRtR RcIrI_')Q?_~R/'I/'I J ! ? ~-alscience ? ~E_nvironmental j~ aboratories, Inc. Janua~ 23,2004 Joel Kiff Kiff Analytical 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Subject: Calscience Work Order No.: 04-01-0823 Client Reference: Beacon Dear Client: Enclosed is an analytical report for the above-referenced project. The samples included in this report were received 1/17/2004 and analyzed in accordance with the attached chain-of-custody. Unless otherwise noted, all analytical testing was accomplished in accordance with the guidelines established in our Quality Assu'rance Program Manual, applicable standard operating procedures, and other related documentation. The original report of any subcontracted analysis is provided herein, and follows the standard Calscience data package. The results in this analytical report are limited to the samples tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. If you have any questions regarding this repod, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Stephen Nowak Project Manager 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 -.aiscience IE -_nvironmental Analytical Report. aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 01/17/04 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 04-01-0823 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 351 OB Method: EPA 8310 Project: Beacon Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample Date Date Date Client Sample Number Number Collecled Matrix Prepared Analyzed QC Batch ID IMW-6 04-01-0823-1 0t114/04 Aqueous 01119/04 01/t9104 040119L01 I Parameter Result RI_ DF Qual Units Parameter Result RI_ DF Oual Units Naphthalene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (a) Anthracene 8.8 1.0 1 ug/L Acenaphthylene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Chrysene ND 1.0 I ug/L Acenaphthene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 1.0 I ug/L Fluorene 21 1 1 ug/L Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Phenanthrene 18 1 1 ug/L Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 0.20 I ug/L Anthracene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND. 1.0 I ug/L Fluoranthene 39 1 1 ug/L Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Pyrene 2.9 1.0 1 ug/L Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 1.0 I ug/L Surroqates: RE, C t%) Control qual Limits Decafluorobiphenyl 147 40-160 IMethod NIA 01/19104 0t119/04 040119L01 I Blank 099-07-003-393 Aqueous Parameter Result RI_ DF Oual Units Parameter Result RI.. DF Qual Units Naphthalene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Acenaphthylene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Chrysene NO 1.0 I ug/L Acenaphthene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Fluorene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 1.0 I ug/L Phenanthrene ND 1.0 I ug/L Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 0.20 1 ug/L Anthracene ND 1.0 I ug/L Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 1.0 I ug/L Fluoranthene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 1.0 I ug/L Pyrene ND 1.0 I ugiL Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 1.0 1 ug/L Surroctates: REC (%) Control Qual Limits Decafluorobiphenyl 93 40-160 offing Limit , DF - Dilution Factor , Qual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 ? ~-alscience ~._nvironmental Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate ~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: N/A 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 04-01-0623 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 351 OB Method: EPA 8310 Project: Beacon Date Date LCS/LCSD Batch Quality Control Sample ID Mairix Instrument Prepared Analyzed Number I 099-07-003-393 HPLC 5 01119104 01119104 040119L01 Aqueous Parameter LCS %REC LCSD %REC %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 92 106 40-160 14 0-20 Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 91 99 40-160 8 0-20 Benzo (a) Pyrene 78 80 40-160 2 0-20 Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 101 101 40-160 0 0-20 Benzo (g,h.i) Perylene 83 90 40-160 8 0-20 Indeno (1.2.3-c.d) Pyrene 82 88 40-160 8 0-20 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA92841-1427 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 ~--.._a._lscience · F-_n vironmen tal i~ aboratories, Inc. Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers Work Order Number: 04-01-0823 Qualifier Definition ND Not detected at indicated reporting limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove CA 92841-1427 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 z.,.bo~'.,<,,q,o,,,,o. WORK ORDER #: 04 Cooler of SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM TEMPE~TURE - SAMPLES RECEIVED BY: CALSCIENCE COURIER: LABORATORY (Other than Calscience Courier): Chilled, cooler with temperature blank provided. ~ °C Temperature blank. Chilled, cooler without temperature blank. °C IR thermometer. Chilled and placed in cooler with wet ice, Ambient temperature. Ambient and Placed in cooler with wet ice. . Ambient tempe~ture. C Temperature blank. Initial: O CUSTODY SEAL INTACT: Sample(s): Cooler: ~ No (Not Intact) · Not Appli~ble (N/A): SAMPLE CONDITION: Yes No N/A Chain-OFCustody document(s) received with sampies ......................... / .............. Sample container label(s) consistent with custody papers ..................... / .............. Sample container(s) intact and good condition .......... ................ Correct containers for analyses requested .................. · ............ / . ............. Proper presewation noted on sample label(s) ........................................... ~ / ....... VO~ vial(s) free of headspace ...................................................................... Tedlar bag(s) free of condensation .......................................................... COMMENTS: !I '"FF ,~,, second sire,t. Su,te 30~..~~ience Environmental ~ ' Davis, CA 95S16 7440 Lincoln Way Lab: .530.297.4S00 Garden Grove, CA 92841 i ANALYTICAL ~.z.c Fax: 530.297.4808 714-895-5494 Lab No. Page 1 of _1_ Project Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): !Geotracker COELT EDD REPORT? Chain-of-Custody Record and Analysis Request Jo~l Kiff _X_ YES NO Company/Address: Kiff Analytical, LLC Sampling Company Log Code.' DEIO Analysis Request Phone No.: FAX No.: Global ~D: T0602900438 Project Number: P.O. No.: EDF Deliverable to (Email Address): O -->' 3074 Bakersfield 36707 inbox~,kiffanalytical.co ,rn o,i Project Name: E.mall address: Beacon inbox~,kiffanalytical.com Project Address: Sampling ! Container Preservative Matrix ~ Sample ~ >~ ~, 7, --~ O ~ -- O Designation Date Time ~ a. ~E ~ -r =: z -r u) MW-6 1/14/04 8:40 2 X X X X Date Time Received by: Remarks: iRelinquished by: Relinquished I~'y: '~ Date Time Received by: Davis, CA 95616 IANAL]w~'rlCAL LL¢ Lab= 530.297.4800 ,.~ ~-D ~ 0 ~'~ Project Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): I= ,~. R."~.~ P.q7 4RP. R Lab No. Page / of / R.Smith EDF Report? I~lYes I-3.o ~J Chain-of-Custody Record and Analysis Request Company/Address: Recommended but not mandatory to complete this section: HORIZON sampling Company Log Code: DEIO Analysis Request Phone No.: FAX No.: Gk, bal ~O: T0602900438 939-2170 939-2172 Project Number: P.O. No.: EDF Deliverable to (Email Address): 3074 Bakersfield 3074-70 rsmlth~horlzonenvironmental.net Project Name: Beacon Project Address: Bakersfield Sampler Signature (below): Sampling Preservative Matrix de rnation Date w-7 Received by: ! Remarks: Relinquished by: Date by: Relinquish by Laboratory: Bill to: Distribution: While - Lab, Pink - Originator Forms/cDc 121001.fh9 ATTACHMENT D HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER DATA TABLE 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION DATA BEACON STATION #596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Measurements in feet) Reference Monitoring t~levation Depth to Ground Water Well Well Date (top of casin$)~ Ground Water~ Elevation2 Depth Comments MW- 1 08/20/93 100.14 32.80 67.34 --- 12/27/93 25.24 74.90 --- 02/09/94 24.44 75.70 59.46 05/11/94 25.18 74.96 .59.46 08/08/94 26.04 74. I 0 59.48 I 1/09/94 28.90 71.24 59.24 02/07/95 30.63 69.51 59.24 05/09/95 23.83 76.31 59.28 08/08/95 20.30 79.84 59.39 I 1/08/95 18.85 81.29 59.25 02/06/96 19.33 80.81 59.25 04/26/96 20.49 79.65 59.23 08/07/96 18.67 81.47 59.28 10/03/96 100. I I 18.07 82.04 59.35 01/10/97 17.66 82.45 59.35 04/23/97 15.97 84.14 59.35 08/28/97 15.73 84.38 59.35 10/23/97 16.12 83.99 59.35 01/28/98 17.17 82.94 59.35 05/20/98 16.03 84.08 59.35 07/29/98 15.94 84.17 59.35 12/03/98 16.67 83.44 59.35 02/03/99 17.43 82.68 59.33 05/I 1/99 18.04 82.07 59.32 MW-2 08/20/93 100.00 35.43 64 57 --. 1 2/27i93 26.65 73 35 --- 02/09/94 25.65 7435 58.88 05/I 1i94 26.08 73.92 58.87 08/08/94 26.99 73.01 58.88 11/09/94 29.52 70.48 58.65 02/07/95 31.66 68.34 58.64 05/09/95 24.99 75.01 58.73 08/0g/95 21.27 ' 7873 58.90 I 1/08/95 19.58 80.42 58.68 02/06/96 19.85 80.15 58.66 04/26/96 21.05 78.95 58.69 08/07/96 19.33 8067 58.67 I 0/03/96 I $.66 8 I. 34 ,58.74 01/10/97 18.22 81.78 58.74 04/23/97 16.46 83.54 58.75 08/28/97 16. I 0 83.90 58.75 10/23/97 16.47 83.53 58.75 01/28/98 17.62 82.38 58.75 05/20/98 16.48 83.52 58.75 07/29/98 16.41 83.59 58.75 12/03/98 17.03 82.97 58.75 02/03/99 17.79 82.21 58.74 05/I 1/99 18.42 81.58 58.74 NOTES: I = Measurement and reference elevation taken from notch/mark on top north side of well casing. .. 2 = Elevation referenced to the casing riser on monitoring well MW-2. w~th an assumed elevation of 100 feet. Well Depth = Measurement from top of casing to bottom of well. -- = Not Measured. 3 = Well A~oandoned. 4 = Well Not Surveyed. TABLE 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION DATA BEACON STATION 11596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Measurements in feet) Reference Monitoring Elevation ' Depth to Ground Water Well Well Date (top ofcasin~)~ Ground Water~ Elevation-' Depth Comments MW-3 08/20/93 100.76 36.22 64.54 --- 12/27/93 27.47 73.29 --- 02/09/94 26.45 74.31 59.87 05/11/94 27.12 73.64 59.87 : 08/08/94 28.22 72.54 59.89 I 1/09/94 31.11 69.65 59.66 02/07/95 32.93 67.83 59.63 05/09/95 26.07 74.69 59.75 08/08/95 22.35 78.41 59.87 I 1/08/95 20.71 80.05 59.65 02/06/96 21.09 79.67 59.65 04/26/96 22.33 78.43 59.65 08/07/96 20.41 80.35 59.64 10/03/96 100.72 19.69 81.03 59.7 l 01/10/97 19.11 81.61 59.73 04/23/97 17.53 83.19 59.74 08/28/973 MW-4 05/09/95 101.40 24.63 76.77 40.75 08/08/95 2 I. 12 80.28 40.97 I 1/08/95 19.69 81.71 41.22 02/06/96 20.24 8 I. 16 41.25 04/26/96 21.43 79.97 41.28 08/07/96 19.44 81.96 41.3 I 10/03/96 100.70 18.83 81.87 40.75 01/10/97 18.36 82.34 40.76 04/23/97 16.76 83.94 40.76 08/28/97 16.54 84.16 40.76 - 10/23/97 [ 6.94 83.76 40.76 01/28/98 17.87 82.83 40.76 05/20/98 16.71 83.99 40.76 07/29/98 16.63 84.07 40.76 12/03/98 17,31 83.39 40.76 02/03/99 18. I 0 82.60 40.76 05/11/99 18.75 81.95 40.75 MW-5 05/09/95 100.14 26.37 73.77 42.55 08/08/95 22.73 77.41 42.74 11/08/95 2 I. 16 78.98 42.75 02/06/96 21.64 78.50 42.78 04/26/96 22.87 77.27 42.75 08/07/96 20.85 79.29 42.76 10/03/96 101.38 20.16 81.22 42.05 01/10/97 19.58 81.80 42.03 04/23/97 18.05 83.33 42.0 I 08/28/97 17.78 83.60 42.0 l 10/23/97 ...... 5.55 Dam,~ged, Filled w/Din 01/28/98 18.83 82.55 24.81 05/20/98 17.78 83.60 24.81 07/29/98 ! 7,62 83.76 38.15 12/03/98 18.22 83,16 38.15 02/03/99 18.99 82.39 38.14 05/I 1/99 19.70 81.68 38.15 NOTES: I = Measurement and reference elevation taken from notch/mark on top north side of well casing, 2 = Elevation referenced to the casing riser on monitoring well MW-2, wRh an assumed elevation of 100 feet. Well Depth = Measurement from top of casing to bottom of well. m = Not Measured. 3 = Well Abandoned. 4 = Wall Not Surveyed. TABLE 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION DATA. BEACON STATION #596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Measurements in feet) Rc£crcncc Monitoring Elevation Depth tO Ground Water Well Well Date (top of casing,)I Ground Water Elevation: Depth Comments MW-6 07/29/98 101.26 17.87 83.39 33.73 12/03/98 18.42 82.84 33.73 02/03/99 19.20 82.06 33.76 05/I 1/99 19.89 81.37 33.76 . MW-7 07/29/98 I 01.42 17.79 83.63 34.17 12/03/98 18,37 83.05 34.17 02/03/99 18.15 83.27 34.15 05/I 1/99 19.81 81.61 34.16 V- 1 02/09/94 100.54 ...... 25.28 Dry 05/I 1/94 ...... 25.22 Dry 08/08/94 ...... 25.27 Dry I 1/09/94 ...... 25.22 Dry 02/07/95 ...... 25.09 Dry 05/09/95 ...... 25. l I Dry 08/08/95 23.32 77.22 26.28 11/08/95 21.62 78.92 25.25 02/06/96 22.04 78.50 25.25 04/26/96 23.31 77.23 25.25 08/07/96 21.33 79.21 25.28 10/03/96 I 01.39 20.63 80.76 25.19 Sheen 01 / 10/97 20.12 81.27 25.22 Sheen 04/23/97 18.37 83.02 25.26 08/28/97~ V-2 02/09/94 100.23 26.55 73.68 30.18 05/11/94 27.19 73.04 30.19 08/08/94 28.61 71.62 30.18 I 1/09/94 29.83 70.40 30.02 02/07/95 ...... 30.02 Dry 05/09/95 26.08 74.15 30.04 08/08/95 22.41 77.82 30.20 I 1/08/95 20.78 79.45 30.05 02/06/96 2 I. 16 79.07 30.04 04/26/96 22.37 77.86 30.04 08/07/96 20.51 79.72 30.04 I 0/03/96 101.24 19,83 81.41 30.01 ,01/10/97 19.36 81.88 30.02 04/23/97 ...... 30.02 0.02 tOOt Free Product 08/28/973 NOTES: 1 = Measurement and reference elevation taken from notcJ't/mark on top north side of well casing 2 = Elevation referenced to the casing riser on monitoring well MW-2, with an assumed elevation of 100 feet. Well Oepth = Measurement from top of casing lo bottom of well. -- = Not Measured. 3 = Well Abandoned. 4 = Well Not Sum, eyed. TABLE 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION DATA BEACON STATION #596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Measurements in feet) Reference Monitoring Elevation Depth to Ground Water Well Well Date (top ofeasin[~)~ Ground Water~ Elevation2 Depth Comments V-3 08/20/93 100.68 34.97 65.71 --- 12/27/93 27.02 73.66 02/09/94 ......... Obstruction at 9' 05/I 1/94 27.28 73.40 42.01 Sheen 08/08/94 28.36 72.32 42.12 I I/09/94 31.29 69.39 39.89 02/07/95 33.06 67.62 39.90 05/09/95 26.20 74.48 42.05 08/08/95 22.51 · 78.17 42.05 11/08/95 20.89 79.79 39.85 02/06/96 21.35 79.33 39.82 04/26/96 22.57 78. I I 39.83 08/07/96 20.61 80.07 39.89 10/03/96 I 01.09 19.93 8 I. 16 39.95 0 I/I 0/97 19.35 81.74 39.97 04/23/97 17.75 83.34 39.94 08/28/97~ V-4 02/09/94 100.16 26.23 73.93 30.00 05/I 1/94 26.95 73.21 30.00 08/08/94 27.99 72.17 30.0 I 11/09/94 29.66 70.50 29.8 I 02/07/95 ...... 29.82 Dry 05/09/95 25.84 74.32 29.83 08/08/95 22.19 77.97 28.96 ' I 1/08/95 20.61 79.55 29.80 02/06/96 21.02 79.14 29.80 04/26/96 22.23 77.93 29.82 08/07/96 20.30 79.86 29.84 10/03/96 101.03 19.63 81.40 29.78 01/10/97 19. I I 81.92 29.79 04/23/97 17.49 83.54 29.78 08/28/97~ VE~6~ 05/I I/99 18.93 19.95 RW- I 10/03/96 I 0 I. I 0 19.64 81.46 43. I I 01/10/97 t9.14 81.96 43.10 04/23/97 17.50 83.60 43.14 08/28/97~ NOTES: I = Measurement and reference elevation taken from notch/mark on top north side of well casing. 2 = Elevation referenced to the casing riser on monitoring well MW-2, with an assumed elevation of 100 feet Well Depth = Measurement from top et' casing to bottom of well. ~ = Not Measured. 3 = Well Al~andoned 4 = Well Not Sumeyed . TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS BEACON STATION 11596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Ali results in. micrograms per Liter) Monitoring Date Total Aromatic Volatile Organics Well Collected Petroleum Hydrocarbons Gasoline[Diesel MTBE' Benzene I Toluene I Ethyl.I Total benzene ' Xylenes M W- 1 08/20/93 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.75 12/27/93 57 NS 1.5 2.6 1.7 9.8 01/06/94 NS 130 NS NS NS NS 02/09/94 <50 <50 <0. 5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 05/I 1/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 11/09/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 02/07/95 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 05/09/95 <50 <50 <0. 5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 I 1/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/06/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0, 50 <0.50 <0.50 04/26/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/07/96 <50 <50 <5,0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0,50 I0/03/96 <50 <50' <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 01/10/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/23/97 <50 180 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/28/98 <50 <50 <5,0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/20/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 07/29/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12/03/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/03/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/I 1/99 <50 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 MW-2 08/20/93 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 12/27/93 61 NS I. I 2.4 1.4 7.8 01/06/94 NS, <50 NS NS NS NS 02/09/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 05/I 1/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 I 1/09/94 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 02/07/95 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 05/09/95 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 I 1/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/06/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/26/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/07/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/03/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/10/97 <50 70 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/28/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/20/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 07/29/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12/03/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/03/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/11/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NOTE: MTSE' = Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Etner. = Below indicated detection limit = Well Abandoned. 3 = Well not sampled on this dale (see Comments in Table 1). = Product not typical gasoline. -- = Sample also contains gasoline range product similar to Stoddard Solvent. ~ = /nc. teased reporting limit due to interference from gasoline and high boiling point compounds. TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS BEACON STATION #596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Ali results in micrograms perLiter) Monitoring Date Total Aromatic Volatile Organics Well Collected Petroleum Hydrocarbons benzene Xylenes MWo3 08/20/93 1,900 130 17 1.3 40 76 12/27/93 2,800 NS 50 <2.5 23 390 01/06/94 NS 390 NS NS NS NS 02/09/94 2,500 500 49 <1.3 50 450 05/I 1/94 2,800 660 <1.3 <1.3 92 540 08/08/94 2,600 480 <2.5 <2.5 80 760 I 1/09/94 1,500 290 <2.5 <2.5 16 85 02/07/95 770 100 0.64 <0.5 4.4 37 05/09/05 2,700 1,300 32 <5.0 81 580 08/08/95 2,200 <100 3.6 <2.5 59 590 11/08/95 1,800 <50 <2.5 2.6 89 520 02/06/96 2, 100 86 <2.5 <2.5 6.9 470 04/26/96 2,900 <100'** <1.3 <1.3 16 550 08/07/96 2,400 78 < 13 < 1.3 < 1.3 34 400 10/03/96 1,600 71 <5.0 1.6 2.7 63 260 01/10/97 1,500 62 <13 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 140 04/23197 1,500 . <100*** <13 <1.3 <1.3 2.1 170 08/28/97: MW-4 05109/95 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 11/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/06/96 <50 ~ <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/26/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50. <0.50 08/07/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/03/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0~50 <0.50 01/10/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 - 04/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/28/98 <50 130 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/20/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 07/29/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12/03/98 ~50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/03/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/11/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 MW-5 05/09/95 <50 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 I 1/08/95 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/06/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/26/96 <50 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/07/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/03/96 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/10/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/23/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/23/973 01/28/98 <50 210 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/9-0/98 <50 70 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 07/29/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12/03/98 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/03/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 05/11/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NOTE: MTBE' = Methyl-Tertian-Butyl Ether. < = Below indicated detection limit. 2 = Well Abandoned. 3 = Well not sampled on this date (see Comments in Table 1 ). -. = Product not typical gasoline ~ = Sample also contains gasoline range produc~ similar to Stoddard Solvent. ~ = increased reporting limit due to interference from gasoline and high boiling point compounds. TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS BEACON STATION #596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (All results in micrograms per Liter) Monitoring Date Total Aromatic Volatile Organics WeJl Collected Petroleum Hydrocarbons Gasoline Diesel MTBE~ Benzene Toluene Ethyl- Total benzene Xylcnes MW-6 07/29/98 710 150,000 <5.0 0.74 0.62 0.53 1.6 12/03/98 140 63,000 <5.0 0.54 0.76 <0.50 0.74 02/03/99 150 46,000 <5.0 1.3 <0.50 <0.50 1.5 05/11/99 4,100 86,000 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.85 MW-7 07/29/98 .270 1,800 140 2.4 <0.50 1.2 2.7 12/03/98 280 480 I l0 4.7 <0.50 2.9 5.6 02/03/99 <50 70 31 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 i .0 05/I 1/99 620 <500 6.8 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 3.6 V- 1 02/09/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS 05/I 1/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS 08/08/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS I 1/09/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS 02/07/95 NS NS . NS NS NS NS 05/09/95 NS NS NS NS NS NS 08/08/95 7,600 20,000 13 6.9 39 1,400 11/08/95 1,700 14,000 17 16 91 1,100 02/06/96 3,000 4,600 <5.0 <5.0 14 750 04/26/96 2,700 7,400 < 1.3 < 1.3 8.9 180 08~07/96 5,300 800 <13 13 <1.3 150 580 10/03/96 3,800 8,100 560 12 11 190 810 01/10/97 3,300 2,000 · <25 <2.5 <2.5 67 310 04/23/97 ! 4,000 6,600 13,000 69 < 13 330 940 08/28/97z V-2 02/09/94 I 0,000 <50 45 340 320 2,900 05/I 1/94 3,800 <100 23 160 130 870 08/08/94 2,500 <50 7.3 76 100 740 1 l/09/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS 02/07/95 NS NS NS NS NS NS 05/09/95 9,000 <50 12 200 250 2,300 08/08/95 48,000 < 100 <25 900 1,3,00 9,800 I 1/08/95 43,000 <500 <25 920 1,800 13,000 02/06/96 30,000 <200*** <25 43 320 8,800 04/26/96 7,700 <300'** < 13 < 13 <13 140 08/07/96 34,000 <100'** <250 <25 510 300 5,400 10/03/96 24,000 <100*** 300 <13 210 430 6,200 01/10/97 27,000 <100'** 530 <13 71 320 7,000 04/23/97~ 08/28/97: NOTE: MTBE~ = Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether. < = Below indicated detection limit. · 2 = Well Abandoned. 3 = Well not sampled on ~is date (see Comments in Table 1 ). = Product not typical gasoline. ~ = Sample also contains gasoline range product similar to Stoddard Solvent ~ = increased reporting limit due to interference from gasoline and high boiling point compout~cls TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS BEACON STATION//596 3225 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (All results in micrograms per Liter) Monitoring Date Total Aromatic Volatile Organics Well Collected Petroleum Hydrocarbons benzene X¥1enes V-3 08/20/93 4,000 9,000 <5.0 <5.0 68 190 12/27/93 25 NS 0.071 0.053 0.19 0.38 02/09/94 NS NS NS NS NS NS 05/I 1/94 110,000' 2,800 <50 <50 <50 180 08/08/94 130,000' 48,000'* <5.0 12 26 150 11/09/94 6, 100 7,200 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 20 02/07/95 2,800* 5,000 3.1 <2.5 <2.5 21 05/09/95 13,000' 45,000 5.0 <2.5 9.1 2.8 08/08/95 19,000' 17,000 <2.5 <2.5 6.8 29 I 1/08/95 6,500* 30,000 <0.50 <0.50 1.0 8.8 02/06/96 2,100' 24,000 <1.3 <1.3 2.6 3.0 04/26/96 2,500* 9,000 <0.50 <0.50 4.2 <0.50 08/07/96 450' 2,500 <5.6 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.96 10/03/96 300* 2,500 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 3.2 01/10/97 250* 4,200 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 2.1 04/23/97 310' 2,100 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 0.68 0.93 08/28/97: V-4 02/09/94 330 2,800 0.56 <0.5 <0.5 1.3 05/I 1/94 <50 3,300,000 0.86 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/94 <50 ** <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 I 1/09/94 NS 5,900 NS NS NS NS 02/07/95 NS NS NS NS NS NS 05/09/95 75 NS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 08/08/95 <50 430 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 11/08/95 <50 120 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 02/06/96 <50 t 80 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/26/96 <50 130 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/07/96 <50 91 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10/03/96 <50 520 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0 I/I 0/97 <50 150 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0~50 04/23/97 73 620 <5.0 0.87 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97: VE-6 05/I 1/99 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 RW-I 10/03/96 <50 <50 9.3 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 01/10/97 <50 <50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 04/23/97 <50 <50 6.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 08/28/97-~ NOTE: MTBE~ = Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether. < = Below indicated detection limit. 2 = Well At~andoned. 3 = Well not sampled on this date {see Comments in Table 1 ) = Product not typical gasoline. -- = Sample also contains gasoline range product similar to Steddard Solvent. ~ = incz'eased reooding limit due to interference from gasoline and high boiling point compounds ATTACHMENT E GEO WELL ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE CONFIRMATION SHEET Uploading GEO_WELL File Page 1 of 1 AB2886 Electronic Delivery Main.Menu I ~(.[~w/!/~.~.C[..E.~;iliti~ [ Upload EDDI ~he~.~. !~[~.D UPLOADING A GEO_WELL FILE Processing is complete. No errors were foundl Your file has been successfully submitted! Submittal Title: 1596-Q104 Submittal Date/Time: 112612004 5:36:10 PM , Confirmation Number: 7583210587 Back to Main Menu Logged in as ULTRADUDES (RP) CONTACT SITE ADMINISTRATOR. https://esi.swrcb.ca.gov/ab2886/upload_geo3.asp?temp_£older=802819ULTKADUDES&cI..: 1/26/2004 BEACON 3074 3225 BUCK OWENS BAKERSFIELD CA 9J308 661 324-9481 OCT 22, 2003 !:58 PM SYSTEM STATUS REPORT iE -A AR - -.- -i - T i:SUDDEN~LOSS ALARM.' T 3:LEAK ALARM T 3:SUDDEN LOSS ALARM INVENTORY REPORT T i:DIESEL 2 VOLUME = 6780 GALS ULLAGE = 13288 GALS 90~ ULLAGE= 11281 GALS TO VOLUME = 6783 GALS HEIGHT = 47.51 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = O.O0 INCHES TEMP = 85.1DEG F T 3:UNLEADED V~t]~J.E = 5956 GALS U~LA~E = 8174 GALS 90~ ULLAGE= 6761 GALS TO VOLUME = 5858 GALS HEIGHT = 42.07 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0.80 INCHES TEMP. = 83.4 DEG F T VOLUME = 2296 GALS ULLAGE = 7845 GALS 90M~ULLAGE= 6829 GALS TC'~EUME ~ 2254 GALS HEIG~%t~' = 26.65 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS t 0.80 INCHES WATER' TEM~/ = 85.9 DEG F ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ END ~ ~'~ ~ ~ UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Enironmenta] Set,riceS ..... ' ............. ~ 1715 Chester Ave SECTION 1 Business Plan and Inventory Pro§ram Bakersfield, CA 93301'":' Tel: {661)326-3979 FACiLiTY NAME ,-.---- IINSPECTION DATE [ INSPECTION TIME ADDRESS / ....................................... I ~O'N~'T~g. - -" "~-'-[-~:-~i'-~ib7~9~$~- '-~-- ...... ..................................... __ ......................... ....... ............... FACILITYCONTACT fBusiness D Number · / 15-021- Section 1' Business Plan and Inventory Program [] Routine ~ Combined [] Joint Agency [] Multi-Agency [] Complaint [] Re-inspection C V / C=Compliance '~ OPERATION COMMENTS x. V=Violation ~ APPROPRIATE PERMIT ON HAND ~'~ BUSINESS PLAN CONTACT INFORMATION ACCURATE "."'~ [] VISIBLE ADDRESS ' ' · ·': ~ CORRECT OCCUPANCY [] VERIFICATION OF INVENTORY MATERIALS [] VERIFICATION OF QUANTITIES [] PROPER SEGREGATION OF MATERIAL ~ VERIFICATION OF MSDS AVAILABILITYE VERIFICATION OF HAT MAT TRAINING [~[] VERIFICATION OF ABATEMENT SUPPLIES AND PROCEDURES [] FIRE PROTECTION [~'[] SITE DIAGRAM ADEQUATE & ON HAND ANY HAZARDOUS WASTE ON SITE?; [] YES [] No EXPLAIN: White - Environmental Services Yellow - Station Copy Pink - Business Copy CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3'a Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME _~_~tt~tq '~'~'oclt ~oa INSPECTION DATE -r Section 2: Underground Storage Tanks Program [] Routine '~ Combined [] Joint Agency [] Multi-Agency [] Complaint [] Re-inspection Type of Tank timer r_. Number of Tanks ~ Type of Monitoring d ctu, Type of Piping !Otj)f~ OPERATION C V cOMMENTS Proper tank data on file Proper owner~operator data on file Permit fees current ,.,,," Certification of Financial Responsibility t-"~ Monitoring record adequate and current ~ Maintenance records adequate and current Failure to correct prior UST violations Has there been an unauthorized release? Yes No Section 3: Aboveground Storage Tanks Program TANK SIZE(S) AGGREGATE CAPACITY Type of Tank Number of Tanks OPERATION Y N COMMENTS sPcc available SPCC on file with OES Adequate secondary protection Proper tank placarding/labeling Is tank used to dispense MVF? If yes, Does tank have overfill/overspill protection? C=Compliance fi=Violation Y=Yes N=NO Inspector: Office of Environmental Services (661)/526-3979 Business Site Responsible Party White - Env. Svcs. Pink - Business Copy Ultramar' ' Ultramar, Inc, Fax: 559-583-3282 Environmental 685 W. Third Street 559-583-3256 Retail Administration · ' ' Hartford, CA 93230-5016 ' 559-583-3330 Human Resource (559) 582-0241 559-583-3382 Maintenance October 3,2003 Bakersfield City Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue _ Bakersfield, .CA 93301 RE: Beacon Station #3074 3225 Buck Owens Blvd Bakersfield, CA 93301 Enclosed' are the spill bucket test results performed on September 24, 2003, for the above referenced location(s). Please review the test results and should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (559) 583-3298. Very truly yours, ULTRAMAR INC. Part of the valero Family' of Companie's Sandy Huff 0i~'rations & Environmental Specialist Enclosure A Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality And Service SWP. CB~ ~.an~aary 2002 : SecOndarY Containment Testing. Re. port For'm Th~s form is intended for use'by contractors performing period~c testing of UST se¢ondary containment syste,zs. Use' the a~vpro.vriate.vage? of this f°tm w re, orr results for'ail com~on~ts te~ted. ~e completed fo~; ~'itt~ t~t procedu~te& and printouts ~om.tests (~ ~plicabIe). should be provided to the facili~ owns/operator for subminal 'W the local re~Iato~ agent. ~ DatS ~cak Agency Was Notified.. ofTes6ng: ' ]~]Name o'fLocal Agency ~speotor (fpresent d~ing testing): 2. T~T~G cO~CTOK ~FO~TION ' Tec~icim Conducting Test: credenhfls: ~ CSLB Licensed Con.actor · ~ S~CB' Licensed T.~ Tester Manufacturer Traini,g Man~acmrer Component(s) Date Training Ex~ires 3. SU1VLMARY OF TEST RESULTS · Not Repairs] Component ' Fail Te~ted Made~ Component· Pass Fall Tested Made O D O O ' 0 O O O If hydrosmdz t~sting was p~o~ 6~scfibe what was done wj~ the water after completion of tests: CERT~CATiON' OF TEC~IC~ ~SPONS[BLE FOR CONDU~G T~S ITEST~G To the best of my knowledge, the fa~s ~amd in this ~cumenr are accurate and in full compaance legal requireme~s t ~wRC'B, J~ua~ 2002 ' Pa~ e ~--'of ~ ' .... 9.' SPILL/OVERFILL CONTAINMEiNT BOXES ~ac~tity is No~ Equipped With Spil]/Overfill .Containment Boxes. D $~ill/Ove~ll Containment. Boxes are Present. but were Not Tested ~J Test Methoc[ Developed By: ,2 Spill.Bucket Manufacturer ~ndu~' Standard D ~mfessional Emgineer Test. Method Used: D ~ressure ~ Vacuum , ~ydrosmtic. -' ~ O~er (Spec~) Test E~ipment Used: ~ ~ [ .Eqmpment Resolutio=: ~~_, SPilt Box ¢~ SpilI Box ¢ ~? Spill Box . ~ilI Box ~~ sta~in~ test: , Pass*ail T~eshold or Criteria: ~0-~'~ ~ '{ /t ~ // i ( Comments - (include infon~eation on re]~airz made pxior to teszin~,, and recommeTqded £ollow-u.zg.fox fa£1ed zests) .~:~.._ BUCK OWENS BLUD ii~ECtCOt"~ 7:;074 B~KERSFtELD C~ 93301 .... BUCK OWEN8 BLUD ~¢ 559-59i-t097' ,~ ,-~c. =' "~ C~ 93301 ~_,~ ........ Pt ~ - 559-59i-1097 JOEL PERE2 FIEL ~'~ J__ r=RE~ 09...'24/2003 i2:39 PM SUMF' LE~K T~ ~ REPORT SUMP LE~K TEST REPORT SPBX-87 T~¢'~ ST¢~RTED ~2:24 PM TEST STARTED 09/24./2003 TEST STARTED 09/24/2003 BEGIH LEUEL ~.7308 ["~ G:EGtN LEUEL 2.4080-IN END TIME !2:2! P" .... ~ PM END O~TE 09/24/2005 END TIME zz.o. END LEUEL ~.7303 Ib.i .EHD [)~TE 0?24/2003 LE~K THRESHOLD 0;002. END LEUEL 2.4072 LE~K THRESHOLD 0.002 IN TE.ST RESULT P~SSED TEST RESULT P~SSED. TEST STARTED 12:05 PM l~% .~o, STARTED 09/24¢'2003 BEGI~ LEUEL 1. 4839 END TIME 12:2t PM E~[) D~TE 09/24/2003 END LEUEL i.4828 LE~K THRESHOLD, 0.002 ....... TES% RESUL~ P~SSED 'Ultramar Ultramar; Inc. Fax: 559-583-3282 Environmental 685 W, Third Street 559-583-3256 Retail Administration Hartford, CA 93230-5016 559-583-3330 Human Resource (559) 582-0241 559-583-3382 Maintenance September 10, 2003 Bakersfield City Fire Department -Office .of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Beacon Stat:ion #3074 3225 Buck ()wens Blvd Bakersfield, CA 93301 Enclosed are the line, leak detector and monitoring equipment certification test performed on August 8, 2003, for the above referenced location(s). Please review the test results and should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (559) 583-3298. --':? ' Very 'truly yours, ULTRAMAR INC. Part of the Valero Family of Companies Operations & Environmental Specialist Enclosure BEACON Member of the Ultramar Group of Companies #1 Quality And S~rvice ~. Tankm3~ogy T^.K.OLOO¥ CERT~F~C^TE OF TES~.O 8900 S.OAL °REEK. BU,LD,NG 200 AUST,N. TE~S 78757 TELEPHONE (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 PURPOSE: COMPLIANCE TEST RESULT SUMMARY REPORT ~--. TEST DATE: 08~07~03 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 22277'18 ~ .~"3 CusTOMER PO: CLIENT: VALERO ~,~ ~,~3 .,. SITE: ULTRAMAR 074 ,. 685 W THIRD ST 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. HANFORD, CA 93230 HWY 99/HWY 58 ~, BAKERSFIELD, CA 9330'1 SANDY HUFF Manager (559)583-3298 (66'1)324-948'1 TEST TYPE: TLD-'1 ~ · Produc i.qhtn~ss Test Re~!~ts-*-' ........................ 87 3 UNLEADED DW FIBERG PRESSURE P 0. 000 Y 89 4 PLUS DW FIBERG PRESSURE P 0. 000 Y 20k 6 DIESEL DW FIBERG PRESSURE P P P P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Y 20k 7 DIESEL DW FIBER~ PRESSURE P P 0.000 0.000 Y Existin,q Line Leak Detector Test 87 3 RED JACKET FXiV U1TREADABLE F 89 4 RED JACKET FXlV 111796-532 P 20k 6 RED JACKET FX2~DV i21199-9638 P 20k 7 RED JACKET FX1-DV UNREADABLE P New Replacement Line Leak Detector Test ~ ~ 5REPEACED~EEAI(~DE~ EG~OR~# RE~EACED~EAK~DE~T .:G~OR~/2 ~ 87 3 RED JACKET FXlV 11102-941~ P For owner detailed report information, visit www.tanknology.com and select On-Line Reports-WRAP, or contact your local Tanknology office. Tester Name: KEVIN MATLOCK Technician Certification Number: CA # 02-1633 EXP. 6/ Printed 08/21/2003 17:;19 KOHLMEYER INDIVIDUal.. TANK INFORMATION AND- ,cST RESULTS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227718 TEST DATE: 08/07/03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512.) 451-6334 CLIENT: '~%.T.~RO SITE: tr~ 074 Tank ID: 8? 3 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: .1.40.5 Product: ~ED Vent manifolded: ~s Bottom to grade in inches: 146.0 · capacity in gallons: 14,139 Vapor recovery manifolded: YEs Fill pipe length~ in inches: 44.5 Diameter in inches: 95.00 Overfill protection: ~J~s Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 33? Overspill protection: Y'J~S Stage I vapor recovery: DUA~ , · Material: DW S~.T, Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSTST CP installed on: / / COMMENTS . i , PSI at tank boffom: New/pas~d ' Failed/replaced New/pas~d Failed/replaced " Fluid level in inches: L.D. UFT/OFT: Make: Fluid volume in gallons: Model: Tank water level in inches: SIN: ~o2-~4~ Test time: Open time in sec: 2. oo NOT J Number ofthe~isters: Holding psi: 17 ~ NOT Specific gravity: ~s~ ~esiliency co: 70 ~S~D Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/m: Determined by (method): Mete[lng psi: Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo 3. oo Result: Results: m~s F~L COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: Ullage volume: Material: DW ~FIBERG Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 2.0 Results: Length (~t): 30.0 Test psi: 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 Time of test 1: Test time (min): 30 Star~ time: 09: 05 NOT NOT NOT Temperature: NOT Flow ~ate (cfh): ~'~S'i~D End time: 09:35 Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 Temperature: Result: PASS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: PRESSI.~R~ Time of test 3: Pump make: ~D JAC~T Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: Y~s COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 08:23 SBOWERS INDIVIDUal. TANK INFORMATION AND"n=ST RESULTS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 TEST DATE: 08/0'///03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 222,/,/.1.8 CLIENT: ~A.[~RO SITE: OL~ 0'/4 Tank ID: 89 4 Tank manifolded: ~0 Bottom to top fill in inches: .- [38.5 Product: P~.os ., Vent manifolded: 3r~s Bottom to grade in inches: 1~5.0 ... Capacity in gallons: Z0,139 Vapor recovery manifolded: ~s Fill pipe length in inches: 42.5 . Diameter in inches: 95.00 Overfill protection: ~s Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 .. Length in inches: 33'/ Overspill protection: '/ss Stage. I vapor recovery: : Material: DW STEEL Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST CP installed on: / / COMMENTS PSI at.tank bottom: New/passed Failed/replaced* New/passed Failed/replaced .Fluid level in inches: L;D. #1 L.D. #1 : . L.D. #2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: Z~D :nCI~Z Fluid volume in gallons: Model: FX~V " Tank water level in inches: S/N: T, est time: NOT Open time in sec: 2. oo .. Number of thermisters: Holding psi: ~? NOT Specific gravity: TEST~.D Resiliency cc: 75 TESTED Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/m: 189.0 Determined by (method): Metedng psi: Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3.00 Result: Results: ~ASS COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: ~ Ullage volume: Material: DW Diameter (in): 2.0 Ullage pressure: Results: Length (fi): 3O. 0 Test psi: 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 Time of test 1: Test time (min): 30 Temperature': NOT ~ Start time: 09: 05 NOT NOT NOT Flow rate (cfh): TESTED End time: 09:35 TESTED TEST~..D TESTED Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 Temperature: Result: PASS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: P:t~sso-z~ Time of test 3: Pump make: ~D JACI~T Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: ,z-ss COMMENTS "' COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 08:23 SBOWERS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 ' TEST DATE: 08/07/03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227718 CLIENT: VALE:RO SITE: ULTRAMAR 0?4 Tank ID: 20k 6 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom totop fill in inches: 193.0 Product: DTESEL 'Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to'grade in inches: 201.0 Capacity in gallons: 20 ,:068 Vapor recovery manifolded: NO ., Fill pipe length in inches: 64.0 Diameter in inches: 12 9.00 Overfill protection: YJ[S .Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 358 Overspill protection: ,z~s Stage I vapor recovery: .Material: DW STEEL Installed: ATG Stage Il,vapor recovery: NONE CP installed on: / / COMMENTS Lines b, c, d and a & b form tank 97 are all stilite lines ..... ,' PSI at tank bottom: ,~ New/passed Failed/replaced ::New/passed Failed/replaced Fluid level in inches:" L.D. #1 L.D..#1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: ~,~D JAC~.~T Fluid volume in gallons: Model: ~X2-DV Tank water level in inches: S/N: 2~99-96~s , l Test time: NOT Open time in sec: 4. oo Number of thermisters: Holding psi: 20 NOT Specific gravity: TESTED Resiliency cc: 14o TESTED Water table depth in inches: l'est leak rate mi/m: · zsg. o Determined by (method): Metering psi: 14 · Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo Result: Results: PASS COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: Ullage volume: Material: DW FIBERG DW FIBERG DW FIBERG DW FIBERG Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Results: Length (ft): 220.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Test psi: 50 50 50 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 0 0 0 Time of test 1: Test time (min): 40 40 40 4O Temperature: NOT Start time: 11: 33 11:33 : 11: 33 11:33 Flow rate (cfh):" TEsTEz) End time: 12:13 12:13 12:13 12:13 Time of test 2: Final gph: O. 000 O. 000 O. 000 O. 000 Tempe ratu re: Result: PAS S PASS PASS PAS S Flow rate (cfh); Pump type: P~SSOaE pR]~ssOZ~ .P~SSUZ~, PRESS~ Time of test3: Pump make: aED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: Y~S COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 08:23 SBOW, ERS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 TEST DATE: 08/07/03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 .WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227718 CLIENT: VALERO " ' SITE: U'LTRAMAR 074 Tank ID: 20X ? Tahk manifolded: ~0 Boffom to, top fill in inches .[93.0 Product: Dz~s~ - Vent manifolded: ~0 , · Boffom to'grade in ,inches: 20[. 0 Capaci~ ingallons: 20,000 Vapor recover'manifolded: ~0 .. Fill pipe~length in inches: 6~ .'0 Diameter in inches: [2 9.00 ~e~ll protection: ~s · Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 357 -' ~ Overspill :protection: ~s Stage I vapor recover: ~0~ Material: 9~ s~ Installed: A~G Stage II vapor recover: ~0~ CP installed on: / / COMMENTS PSI at tank bottom: New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Fluid level in inches: L.D. #1 L.D. #1, LD.#2 LD. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: ~D Fluid volume in gallons: Model: FX1-DV Tank water level in inches: S/N: ~,~,~,.~. .... ~ · ' Test time: I~OT Open time in sec: 4. oo Number of thermisters: T]i:STED Holding psi: 2~. :' Specific gravity: Resiliency cc: 1_35 ~' TESTED Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/m: 1_s9.0 Determined by (method):? Metering psi: 1_~' Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph; 3. oo Result: Results: ~ASS COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: ' Ullage volume: Material: , Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 Ullage pressure: Results: Length (fi): 20.0 20.0 Test psi: 50 50 DATA FOR UTS.4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 0 Time of test 1: Test time (rain): 40 40 ~ Temperature: ~0~ Start time: 11: 33 11: 33 z~o~ ~0~ Flow rate (cfh): TESTED End time: 12: 13 12: 13 TESTED, TESTED Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 0. 000 Temperatu re: Result: ~PAS S PAS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: PI~SSUaE PRESSURE Time of test 3: Pump make: ]~JT.~o ~Ac~ ~D ~AC~ Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: ,z'ss COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 08:23 SBOWERS' ;~ ~' "~"~i~~ ~ONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION ° I:~e By All Jurisdictions Within the State of Californi~ . Authority Cited: Chapter 6. 7, Health and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3 'lTtle 23, CaTifomia Code of Regulations This form must be used to document testing and servic!ng of monitoring equipment. If more than one monitoring system control panel is installed at the facility, a separate certification or report must be prepared for each monitorin.q system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner/operator. The owner/operator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date. A. General Information Facility Name: ULTRAMAR 074 City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93301 Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Contact Phone No: 324-9481 HWY 99/HWY 58 Date of Testing/Service: 08/07/2003 Facility Contact Person: Manager Make/Model of Monitoring System: GBCO EMC Work Order Number: 2227718 · B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected/serviced Tank ID: REGULAR Tank ID: PLUS [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG ~'l Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 [] AnnularSpaceorVaultSensor. Model: 420 ~'~ Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 205 Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: [] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FX1DV [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FX1DV [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: ' [] Electro~ic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: --~ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). [] Other (specifY equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Tank ID: SUPER Tank ID: X---] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: X--'I Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 [] Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: X---I Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: ~ Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: .lr-1 Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FXIDV, FX2DV Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: TankOverfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). --] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Dispenser ID: 1- DIESEL Dispenser ID: 4-DIESEL ~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: '---] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: X~] Shear Valve(s). X'~ Shear Valve(s) X~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). X---] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: 2-DIESEL Dispenser ID: 6/7 '--] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: ~] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: [] Shear Valve(s). "~ Shear Valve(s). r'~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: 3-DIESEL Dispenser ID: 8/9 [~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: "--] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: [] Shear Valve(s). X'~ Shear Valve(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). "~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). · If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility. C. Certification. I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected/serviced in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines. Attached to this certification is information (e.g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to vedfy that this information is correct. and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached a copy of the (Check all that apply): System set-up report; [] Alarm history report [-~ PRINTED NAME:KEVIN MATLOCK SIGNATURE: COMPANY: Tanknology PHONE NO: (800) 800-4633 page 1 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 itoring System Certification Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: 08/07/2003 HWY 99/HWY 58 D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed: 7.03 Complete the following checklist: [] Yes [] No * Is the audible alarm operational? [] Yes [] No * Is the visual alarm operational? [] Yes [] No * Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned S° that other equipment will not [] Yes [] No* interfere With their proper operation? [] Yes [] No; J~IN/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? - For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment [] Yes [] No* [] N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (check all that apply) [] Sump/Trench Sensors; [] Dispenser Containment Se.nsors. Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? [] Yes [] No For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the pdmary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical [] Yes [] No * [] N/A overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at,the tank fill points(s) and operating properly?. If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger?. % [] Yes* [] No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Sect on E, be ow I [] Yes* [] No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) [] Product; [] Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. [] Yes [] No * Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, ii applicable. [] Yes [] No * Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? · In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. E. Comments: REPLACED A FX1V LEAK DETECTOR IN THE REGULAR TURBINE. USED NEW FX1V. ALL DIESEL SATTELITE DISPENSERS ALSO HAVE FLOATS AND SHEAR VALVES. page 2 of 3 oring Systom Gortifieation Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: 08/07/2003 HWY 99/HWY 58 F. In-Tank.Gauging I SIR Eq~uipment . [] Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. [] ' Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Complete the following checklist: [] Yes [] No * Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? [] Yes []No* Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? [] Yes [] No* Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? []Yes []No * Was accuracy of system water levei readings tested? [] Yes []No * Were all probes reinstalled properly? [] Yes []No * Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · in the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): [] Check this box if LEDs are not installed. Complete the following checklist: [] Yes [] No *[ []N/A For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to vedfy LLD performance? (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: [] 3 g.p.h [] 0.1 g.p.h []0.2 g.p.h .~ Yes [] No Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? [~Yes []No* was the testing apparatus propedy calibrated? [] Yes []No* [] N/A For mect'~anical LLDs, does the LED restrict product flow if it detects a leak? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? [] Yes []No* [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? r--~Yes []No* i [] N/A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? ~'~ Yes r--]No * Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H. Comments: page 3 of 3 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST DATE:0 8 / 0 ? / 0 3 WORK ORDER NUMBER3 2 2 ? '718 CLIENT:V2LLERO SITE: OLT]~W[A~ 0'74 COMMENTS PARTS REPLACED i LEAK DETECTOR - RED JACKET FX1 HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE) Pdnted 08/21/2003 17:19 KOHLMEYER SITE DIAGRAM · 8900 SHOAl GRI=EK, BUILDING 200' AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-14.59 TEST DATE: 08/07/03 .WORK ORDER NUMBER22277:[8 CLIENT:V2LT~E~,O SITE: ULT~ 074 / (~ sump ~ 'ENT O ~ VENTS #3 (~ Ultramar ~51-4 UL~ CAR WASH ~ Bakersfield, CA DSk . ~rintod 0812~12003 ~7:~ KOHkMfiYfiR I Work Order: 2227718 Tanknologb-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 8900 Shoal Creek BIvd, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 Date Printed and Mailed: 08/22/2003 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR STEVE UNDERWOOD 1715 CHESTER AVE., 3RD FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Test Date: 08~07~2003 Order Number: 2227718 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: ULTRAMAR 074 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. HWY 99/HWY 58 BAKERSFIELD, CAi 93301 Testing PerfOrmed: Leak detector tests Line tests Monitor Certification Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting - ~ · "rarl~~3y ~,~11~0 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS'?'8757 · TELEPHONE (512) 451.6334 FAX (512) 459:1459 PURPOSE:: COMPLIANCE TEST RESULT SUMMARY REPORT WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227~71.8 TEST DATE: 08/07/03 · ' CUSTOMER,PO: CLIENT: VALERO ' ',~. ' SITE: ULTRAMAR 074 685 W THIRD ST · 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD!'' HANFORD, CA 93230 HWY 99/HWY 58 :, " BAKERSFIELD, CA'93301 SANDY HUFF ' ~:~ Mamiger · ($59)583-3298 (661)324-9481 '~*' Tank Ti.qhtne% Tests Results - TEST TYPE: NONE 87 UNLEADED' lA, 139 95100 DW STEEL 89 PLUS. .. 10,139 '95.00 DW STEEL 20k DIESEL 20,068 129.0 DW STEEL 20k .' DIESEL · 20,000 129.0 DW STEEL · Where regulations require, for VacuTect external water level may be depth o? dry well or water is assumed at lowest point that can be confirmed dry.' -~-~ ........... ~;:~ Product P!~e Ti.qhtness Test Results P ' . 0.000 . . · TLD-1 DW FIBERG 'l PRESSURE 89 & DW FIBERG IPRESSURE P , ' 0. 000 TLD-1 20k .6 DW FIBERG ~ IPRESSURE P m P ' P 0.000 0.000' 0.000 0.000 TLD-1 20k 7 DW FiBERG iPRESS .UREI P P . ' . 0.000 0.000" . TLD-1 Existin,q Line Leak Detector Test 87 ' 3 RED JACKET Fxgv ~ABLE F 89. ' ~ RED JACKET FXl~ 111796-532 P 20k 6 I~ED JACKET FX2-DV. 21199-9638 P 20k 7 , RED JACKET FX1-DV UNREADABLE P . New Replacement Line Leak Detector Test ,, 87 3 FXlV 11102-9414 P For owner detailed report informhtion, visit www.tanknology.com and select On-Line Reports-WRAP, or contact your local Tanknology office. Tester Name: KEVIN MATLOCK ' Technician Certificatibn Number: CA # 02-1633 EXP. 6/ Tester signature: ~'~ 2/~'- ~::~m~; Date Signed: ' t-d~clare under penalty of pe~'jur a licenser! tahk tester in the state of California and that th ntmned in tliis report is true and correct to the best of my .knowledge. . . INDIVIDi TANK INFORMATION ST RESULTS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 TESTDATE: 08/0?/03 AUSTIN, ;I'EXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227718 CLIENT: VALERO ~ SITE: UL~ 074 Tank ID: 8? 3 Tank manifolded: ~o Bottom to top fill in inches: 14o. 5 Product: ~.D. Vent manifolded: 1,~s Bottom to grade in inches: 146.0 Capacity in gallons: 3.4,139 Vapor recovery manifolded: 1,"ss : Fill pipe length in inches: 44.5 Diameter in inches: 95.00 Overfill protection: lq~s Fill pi~3e diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 33? ' Overspill protection:/'ss Stage I vapor recovery: Dt~L Material: DW s~.~g~. Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSTST CP installed on: ! ! COMMENTS : PSI at tank bottom: New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Fluid level in inches: L.D. #1 L.D. :#1. L.D;.#2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: Fluid volume in gallons: Model: ~x~v . ~-~x~v Tank water level in inches: S/N: Test time: Open time in sec: 2. oo ' NOT Number of thermisters: Holding psi: z? NOT Specific gravity: Resiliency cc: 7o ~S~D Water table depth in inches: mi/m: [se.o Determined by (method): Metedng psi: [3 Leak rate Jn gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo 3. oo Result: Results: ~ss COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: Ullage volume: Material: DW FIBERG Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 2.0 Results: Length (fi): 30,0 Test psi: 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bl~edback cc: 0_ Time of test 1: Test time (min): 30 Temperature: ~oT Start time: 09: 05 NOT NOT NOT Flow rate (cfh): /'~S/~D End time: 09: 35 'Z~S/~D Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 Temperature: Result: ~ASS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: Time oftest 3: Pump make: ~ JACKET Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: COMMENTS cOMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 11:20 SBOWERS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 TEST DATE: 08/0'//03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 222,/,/18 CLIENT: VALERO SITE: U'L'rRA..~ 0'/4 Tank ID: 89 4 Tank manifolded: No Bottom to top fill in inches: 138.5 Product: PLUS -' Vent manifolded: ¥'gs Bottom to grade in inches: 145.0 Capacity in gallons: 10,139 Vapor recovery manifolded: ,z-gs Fill pipe length in inches: 42.5 Diameter in inches: 95.00 Overfill protection: ~'-ss Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 33'/ Overspill protection: ,z3~s Stage I.vapor recovery: DU~.L Material: DW STg~.L Installed: ATe Stage II.vapor recovery: ASSTST CP installed on: / / -' COMMENTS PSI at tank bottom: New/passed Failed/replaced ;New/passed Failed/replaced ' Fluid I~vel in inches: L,D. #1 L,D, #1..~, L.D, #2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: . Fluid volume in gallons: Model: FXZV ~ .... Tank water level in inches: S/N: 111796-5324. ': '" Test time: NOT Open time in sec: 2. oo Number of thermisters: Holding psi: ['/ NOT Specific gravity: ~S~D Resiliency cc: 7s ~s~.~o Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate mi/m: leg. o Determined by (method): Metering psi: Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo Result: Results: p~,ss COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: ·. Ullage volume: Material: DW FZBERG .~: Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 2.0 Results: Length (It): 30.0 Test psi: 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 Time of test 1' Test time (min): 30 Temperature: NOT Start time: 0 9: 05 NOT NOT NOT Flow rate (cfh): TES~JI~D End time: 09:35 ~ST~,D ~S~O 'I'~ST~D Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 Temperature: .Result: PASS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: Pl~SS01~ Time of test 3: Pump make: ~ JAC~T Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: ,z-gs COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08122/2003 11:20 SBOWERS INDIVlDL L TANK INFORMATION AN "I EST RESULTS 8900 SHOAL CREEK. BUILDING 200 TEST DATE: 08/0"//03 AUSTIN. TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 222"/"/18 CLIENT: VkT.~RO SITE: o'r_.~ 0"/4 Tank ID: 20k -6 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 193. Product: DI~.S~.L 'Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to grade in inches: 201. Capacity in gallons: 20,068 Vapor recovery manifolded: NO ', Fill pipe length in inches: 64~. Diameter in inches: 3.29.00 Overfill protection: ~rgs Fill,pipe diameter in inches: 4 o Length in inches: 358 Overspill protection: 3-~s ; :'Stage I vapor recovery: NON~ · Material: DW S~gET. .Installed: A~ Stage II vapor recovery: NOZ~ CP installed on: / ./ COMMENTS Lines b, c, d and a & b form tank 97 are all stilite lines , ' PSI at tank bottom:. New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Fluid level in inches:': L.D. #1 L.D. #1 .. ~': .. L.D. #2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: 1~ .~ACZ~T Fluid volume in gallons: Model: FX2-DV Tank water level in inches: S/N: 21199-9638 '" Test time: NOT Open time.in sec: 4. OD ' ~- .. - Number of thermisters: Holding psi: 2o NOT Specific gravity: TESTED . Resiliency cc: 140 TESTED Water table depth in inches: I'est leak rate mi/m: leg. o '~ Determined by (method): Metering psi: Leak rate Jn gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo Result: Results: PASS COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: Ullage volume:.. Material: DW ~'TB~RC- DW FZBERG '. DW F'r]~ERC-' DW ]?rB~_~G Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Results: Length (¢[): 2Z0.0 Z0.0 20.0 20.0 Test psi: 50 50 50 5O DATA FOR UTS.4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 ' 0 0 ~ 0 Time of test 1: Test time (min): 40 40 40 40 Temperature: NOT Start time: 11: 33 11: 33 11: 33 11: 33 FIDTM rate (cfh): ' TESTED End time: 12: 13 12: 13 12: 13 12: 13 Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 0. 000 0. 000 0. 000 Temperature: Result: PASS PASS PASS PASS Flow rate (cfh): Pump type: PRESSO'~¢ P~SSU~,E PR~SSORS PP,~SSO~ Time oftest3: Pump make: RED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET P. ED JACKET Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: ~s COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 11:20 SBOWERS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 TEST DATE: 08/07'/03 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2227'?.1.8 CLIENT: VALERO SITE: OLTRAMAR 07'4 Tank ID: 20k . 7'. Tank manifolded: NO ( Bottom to top fill in :inches: 193.0 Product: DT~.S~.T. Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to grade in, inches: .201.0 Capacity in gallons': 20,000, Vapor recovery manifolded: NO ,Fill pipe length in inches: 64-'. 0 Diameter in inches:, 129.00: Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches:" 357 Overspill protection: YEs Stage I vapor recovery: NONE Material: DW STEEL- Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: NONE CP installed on: / / COMMENTS this tank does not e~st. it is put in only~ to be able to show all of ,the satellite lines for the diesel tank. -' ~: ~ PSI at tank bottom: New/passed Failed/replaced . New/passed Failed/replaced · Fluid level in inches: ~ L.D. #1 L.D. #1, ~ L.D. #2 L.D. #2 UFT/OFT: Make: I~D JACKET Fluid volume in gallons: Model: FX~-DV Tank water level in inches: S/N: o~,~,o~,.-. - : Test time: Open time in sec: 4. oo NOT Number of thermisters: TESTED Holding psi: 2z NOT Specific gravity: Resiliency cc: 1,35 " TESTED Water table depth in inches: ]'est leak rate mi/m: lS9.0 Determined by (method): Metedng psi: 1,6 Leak rate in gph: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo Result: Results: PASS COMMENTS COMMENTS Test time: · . Ullage volume: :' Material: DW FIBERG DW FIBERG Ullage pressure: Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 Results: Length (ft): 20.0 20.0 Test psi: 50 50 DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Bleedback cc: 0 0 ,. Time of test 1: Test time (rain): 40 40 Start time: 11: 33 11: 33 NOT NOT Temperature: NOT Flow rate (cfh): ;. TESTED End time: 12:13 12:13 TESTED TESTED Time of test 2: Final gph: 0. 000 0. 000 Temperature: Result: PASS PASS · Flow rate (cfh):. Pump type: PRESSURE PRESSURE Time of test 3: Pump make: RED JACKET RED JACKET Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Impact Valves Operational: YES COMMENTS COMMENTS Printed 08/22/2003 11:20 SBOWERS ~!~ lira 'J~.~J~ ~ MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION · W Use By All Jurisdictions Within the State of CaliforJ~' ' Authority Cited: Chapter 6. 7, Fl~alth and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3 Title 23, California Code of Regulations This form must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment. If more than one monitoring system control panel is installed at the facility, a separate certification or report must be prepared for each monitodn,q system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner/op, erator. The ownedoperator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date. A. General Information Facility Name: ULTRAMAR 074 City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93301 Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Contact Phone No: 324-9481 HWY 99/HWY 58 Facility Contact Person: Manager Date of Testing/Service: 08/07/2003 Make/Model of Monitoring System: GBCO EMC Work Order Number: 2227718 B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected/serviced Tank ID: REGULAR /! Tank ID: PLUS r~l In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: i~[~] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG MAG [~1 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 r~l Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 205 [] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FX1DV [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. . Model: FX1DV [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: [] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). [] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Tank ID: SUPER Tank ID: [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: [] Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 [] Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: [] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: [] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FXlDV, FX2DV [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: [~ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). [] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Dispenser ID: 1- DIESEL Dispenser ID: 4-DIESEL [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: [] Shear Valve(s). [] Shear Valve(s) [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ~--~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: 2-DIESEL Dispenser ID: 6/7 [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: ~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: [] ShearValve(s). '~ ShearValve(s). ['~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ~] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dispenser ID: 3-DIESEL Dispenser ID: 8/9 [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: --~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: [] Shear ~/alve(s). X'~ Shear Valve(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). * If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility. C. Certification I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected/serviced in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines. Attached to this certification is information (e.g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to vedfy that this information is correct. and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached a copy of the (Check all that apply): System set-up report; .['-'] Alarm history report COMPANY: Tanknolo9¥ PHONE NO: (800) 800-4633 page 1 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 · '~ " Initoring System CertificatiOn Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: 08/07/2003 HWY 99/HWY 58 D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed: 7.03 * Complete the following checklist: [~Yes [] No* IS the audible alarm operational?- : [] Yes [] No * Is the visual alarm operational? [] Yes [] No * Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? [] Yes [] No * Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positionedlso that other equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? [] Yes [~ No* ~-~N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment [] Yes [] No * [] N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (check all that apply) [] SumpfTrench Sensors; [] Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? [] Yes [] No For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the pdmary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical D' Yes [] No * [] N/A overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger?. % [] Yes* [] No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. [] Yes* [] No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) [] Product; [] Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. [] Yes [] No * Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. [] Yes [] No * Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications?. · In Section E below, descdbe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected; E. Comments: REPLACED A FX1V LEAK DETECTOR IN THE REGULAR TURBINE. USED NEW FX1V. ALL DIESEL SA'I-rELITE DISPENSERS ALSO HAVE FLOATS AND SHEAR VALVES. page 2 of 3 '~" " Qnitoring System Certification Site Address: .3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: ' 08/07/2003 HWY 99/HWY 58 F. In=Tank Gauging I SIR Equipment [] Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. [] Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed; This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Complete the following checklist: [] Yes [] No * Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? [] Yes []No* Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? [] Yes [] No * Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? []Yes [] No * Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? [] Yes []No * Were all probes reinstalled properly? [] Yes []No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): [] Check this box if LLDs are not installed. Complete the following checklist: [] Yes [] No * [~N/A For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to vedfy LLD performance? (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: [] 3 g.p.h [] 0.1 g.p.h []0.2 g.p.h ~] Yes [] No * Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements?. E .Yes I [~No * Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? [] Yes [-'-~No * [] N/A For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? [] Yes I r~No* [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? [] Yes DNo * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? ~'~ Yes E~No * Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H, below, descdbe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H. Comments: page 3 of 3 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST DATE:0 8 / 0'7 / 0 3 WORK ORDER NUMBEF~ 2 2'7'7 3. 8 CLIENT:VALERO SITE: UT,Ti~AMA.R 0'7~ COMMENTS PARTS REPLACED i LEAK DETECTOR - RED JACKET FX1 HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE) Printed 08/22/2003 08:50 KOHLMEYER i SITE DIAGRAM 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN. TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-14~9 TEST DATE: 08/07/03 ' · WORK ORDER NUMBER2227718 CLIENT:VAT.I~RO SITE: OT~'~ 07~, (~ Sump C-STORE ~ ENT , (~ (~O VENTS K ~'. U ltramar #51-4 u~~~ 3225 Pierce Rd. CAR WASH Q Bakersfield, CA DSL Printed 08/22/2003 08:50 KOHLMEYER Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 ' Work Order: 2227718 Statio:n No. FUEL TANKS ' m~ w~: ~N (Y~N .~'N Y~N YiN; , ~~: ~ u~ ( u~,~)~ .,, :,:,U~ ;; ; ;:;:: ,,,,~, , ~n~a~: ~al N~ T~ of p~ FUEL :::::: ~,: I Ta~olo~7-~DE B~00 Shoal C~eck, Bui]d~ 200 ~ust~ Texas ~ ' Wo~kOrder: 2227718 Station No. FUEL LINES cu~ CP R~ v~~ Tac~ ~ st S~e ( Y / N ) 1, YIN ~~m~(Y/N) Y/N Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAl. SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield' CA (661) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM FUEL MONITORING CERTIFICATION ... TANK # VOLUM~ CONTENTS 7 zo~ ~s~ NAME OF TESTn~O COMPANY ~'~Z~o/o~ U cos'mA~aS nc~s~ # 7~.~/~ ~ ~ J / NAME & PHONE NUMB~ OF CONTACT PERSON /~/}~L ~ht, ,;') 2.09 3/o5"-/2,~/~ DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDU~ ~). ?-~.~ ~_./0:00,~ ( '- APPROVED BY DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OFFICE' OF.ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES · .~:~: 1715 Chester Ave.,. Bakersfield, CA 93301 :.: .... (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST OPER. ATORS NA.~E OWNERS NANE NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED__ I~ PIPING GOING· TO BE TESTED TAN}(~ VOLUME CONTENTS N~ME OF TESTER ~;~'~m ~n~o~r CERTIFICATION ~ d~ Ok/~ ~ APPROVED ~: DATE S !GNATUR~ OF A~L ICANT ~LERO ENERGY CORPORATION Post Office Box 696000 · San Antonio, Texas 78269-6000 · Telephone (210) 592-2000 April 23, 2003 Certified Mail -Retum Receipt Requested Office of Emergency Services City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Responsibility - Fiscal Year 2002 - UST Facilities Enclosed are the documents for Valero Energy Corporation demonstrating financial assurance for Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities owned by specific subsidiaries of Valero. These documents, listed below, have been updated to include Valero Energy Corporation's financial data for fiscal year 2002. Please forward to the appropriate personnel within your agency. · Letter from CFO specifying the successful completion of the financial test of self- insurance. · Guarantee by Valero Energy Corporation on behalf of the specific Valero subsidiary(s) owning the USTs. · An addendum (list) that specifies the locations and tanks at each facility covered by these financial assurance mechanisms. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (210) 592-4235 or e-mail: j ohn.willrodt(~valero.com. Very truly yours, John Willrodt, Director ~:~0 ~ ~)O'C~-, ~)LOCiJ\c) Retail Compliance ¢/~ JW/nak Enclosures V8159.PMD ~,V~ERO ENERGY CORPORATION Post Offioe Box 696000- San Antonio, Texas 78269-6000 · Telephone (210) 592-2000 April 23, 2003 Certified Mail - Return ReceiPt Requested State of California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P. O. Box 944212 Sacramento, California 94244-2120 916-341-5871 - 916-341-5808 (F) Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Responsibility - Fiscal Year 2002 - UST.Facilities EnClosed are the documents for Valero Energy Corporation demonstrating financial assurance for'Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities owned by specific subsidiaries of Valero. These documents, listed below, have been updated to include ValerO Energy Corporation's financial data for fiscal year 2002: Please forward to the appropriate personnel within your agency. · Letter from CFO specifying .the successful completion of the financial test of self- insurance. · Guarantee by Valero Energy Corporation on behalf of the' specific Valero subsidiary(s) owning the USTs.. · An addendum (list) that specifies the locations and tanks at each facility cOvered by these financial assurance mechanisms. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (210) 592-4235 or e-mail: john.willrodt@valero.com. ~ly yours, ~' Jot~Willrodt, Director - Retail Compliance JW/nak Enclosures V8159.p65 ~ ~------~ ~L~RO John D. Gibbons " ENERGY CORPORATION Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer April 22, 2003 Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested State of California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P. O..Box 944212 Sacramento, Califomia 94244-2120 RE: UST Financial ReSponsibility - Fiscal Year 2002 Dear Madam or Sir: I am th~ Chief Financial Officer of Valer6.Energy Corporation (Valero) located at P. O. Box 500, San Antonio, Texas 78292-0500. This letter is in support of the use of the financial test of self- insurance and guarantee to demonstrate financial responsibility for taking corrective action and/or compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden accidental releases and/or non-sudden accidental releases in the mount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate arising from Operating underground storage tanks. Underground st°rage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this financial test or a financial test under an authorized State program by this owner or 6perator and/or guarantor. A financial test and guarantee is also used by this owner or operator or guarantor to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in the following amounts under other EPA regulations or state programs authoriZed by EPA under 40 CFR parts 271 and 145: EPA Regulation Closure (264.143 and 265.143) ......... ;: ...... ,~ ........ $ 25,539,800 Post-Closure Care (264.145 and 265.145) ........... $11,750,404 '. Liability Coverage (264.147 and265.147)..: .......$8,000,000 Corrective Action (264.101Co)) ............... ,...~ ....... $ 2,833,824 plugging and Abandonment (144.63); ................. $ 963,967 Authorized State Programs Closure ............................................................. $ 509,475 Post-Closure Care ............................................. $ 307,478 Liability Coverage.2 ......... ; ............................... $1,000,000 Corrective Action .... :. ....................................... N/A Plugging and Abandonment .............. ..... x ........ N/A Total .................. ; .............................. $ 50,904,948 Valero has not received an adverse opinion', a disclaimer of opinion, or a "going concern" qualification bom Ernst & Young LLP, its independent auditor, on its financial statements for the. latest' completed fiscal, year. Post Office 'Box 500 · San Antonio, Texas 78292-0500 · Telephone (210) 370-2693 · Facsimile (210) 370-2497 or 2234 UST Financial ResPonsi~ April 22, 2OO3 . Page 2 of 3 ALTERNATWE li 1: Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage being assUred by a financial test, and/or $2,000,000 guarantee ........................................................... : ........................................................ 2. Amount of closure, post closure, corrective action, liability coverage and plugging and abandonment costs covered by a financial test, and/or guarantee ....................... $50,904,948 3. Sum of lines I and 2 ................................................................................................... $52,904,948 $11,544,100,000 4. Total tangibles assets ............................................................................................. ~ .... 5. Total liabilities (if any of the amounts' reported on line 3 is included in total liabilities, you may deduct that amount from this line and add that.amount to line $10,156,900,000 6. Tangible net worth (subtract line 5 from line 4) ........................................................ $1,387,200,000 7. Total assets in the U.S. 9required only if less than 90 percent of assets are located in the U.S ................................................................................................................... $12,766,300,000 8. Is line 6 at least $10 million? ..................................................................................... Yes 9. Is line 6 at least 6 times line 3? .................................................................................. Yes ~10. Are at least 90 percent of assets located in the U.S.? ................................................. No 11. Is line 7 at least 6 times line 3? ............................................................................... ,.- Yes Fill in either Lines I2-15 or Lines 16-18: -- N/A 12. Current assets ............................................................................................................. 13. Current liabilities ....................................................................................................... N/A 14. Net working capital (subtract line 13 from 12) .......................................................... N/A 15. Is line 14 at least 6 times line 3?. ............................................................................... N/A 16. Current bond rating of most recem bond issue ..........................................................BBB 17. Name of rating service ............................................................................................... Standard & Poor's 18. Date of maturity of bond ............................................................................................ 1-15-2013 19. Have £mancial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the SEC, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Electrification Administration? ... Yes UST Financial Responsil~ity · ' · ' April 22, 2003 Page 3 of 3 I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.95 (d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. Gibbons Witness/Notary "Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 4.p -o Date Date Guarantee Guarantee made this April 22, 2003 by Valero Energy Corporation, a business entity organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, herein referred to as guarantor, to the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and to any and all third parties, and obligees, on behalf of Ultramar, Inc. (UI), Valero Refining Co.'- CA (VRC), Valero Refining & Marketing of CA (VRMC) and Valero Marketing & Supply Co. (VMSC) of P.O. Box 696000, San AntoniO, _ Texas 78629-6000. Recitals (1) Guarantor meets .or exceeds the financial test criteria og40 CFR 280.95 Co) or (c) and (d) and agrees to comply with the requirements for guarantors as specified.in 40 CFR 280.96Co). (2) UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC own or operate the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: See addendum to this guarantee. This guarantee .satisfies 40' CFR part 280, subpart H requirements for 'assuring 'funding for taking corrective action and fOr compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused -. by either sudden accidental releases or non-sudden accidental releases or accidental releases, arising fi-om operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the mount of 5; 1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. (3) .On behalf of our subsidiary, guarantor guarantees to SWRCB and to any and all third parties that: In the event that UI, VRC; VRMC and VMSC fail to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the Director of the SWRCB has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon instructions fi-om the' Director, shall funda standby.trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the Director determines that UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC have failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, subpart F, the guarantor upon written instructions fi-om the Direct°r shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC fail to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by. sudden and/or non-sudden accidental releases arising fi-om the operation of the above-identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise fi-om such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions fi-om the Director, shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108 to satisfy such judgment(s), award(s), or settlement agreement(s) up to the limits of coverage specified above. (4) Guarantor agrees that if, at the end of any fiscal year before cancellation of this guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet the financial test Criteria of 40 CFR 280.95 Co) or (c) and (d), guarantor shall send within 120 days of such failure, by certified mail, notice to UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC. The guarantee will terminate 120 days from the date of receipt of the' notice by UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC, as evidenced by the return receipt. -1- , (5) Guarantor agrees to notify UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S; Code naming guarantor as debtor,· within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. " (6) Guarantor agrees to remain bOund under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation ofUI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC pursuant to 40 CFR part 280.. ' (7) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as UI, VRC, VRMc and VMSC must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part . 280, subpart H for the above-identified tank(s), eXcept that.guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice .by certified mail to UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC, such cancellation to become effective 'no earlier than 120 days after receipt of Such notice by UI,. VRC, VRMc and VMSC, as' evidenced by. the return receipt. (8) The .guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any °bligation of UI, VRC, 'VRMc and VMSC under a workers' e°mPensation,' disability benefits, Or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee ofUI, VRc, VRMc and VMsc arising from, and in the . course of, . employment by UI, VRC; VRMC and VMSC; · · : (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entmstment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle," or watercraft; . . (d) Property damage to any property' owned, rented, loaded to, in the care, custody,, or.. cOntrol of, 'or occUpied by 15I, .VRC, VRMC and VMSC that is not the direct.result 'of a release .. from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily damage or property, damage for which UI, VRC, VRMc and VMSC is Obligated to pay damages .by reason of the assumptiOn of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93. (9) Guarantor expressly, waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by sWRCB, by any or. · .' all third parties, or by UI, VRC, VRMC and VMSC. ' · I hereby certify that the wording of this. guarantee is Consistent with; and equivalent to~. the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.96(c) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date ~ shown immediately beloW. EffeCtive date: ' t./- 2bq"~.~ . Valero Energy COrporation " Executive Vice President 'and Chief Financial Officer · ~ · · Signature of witness or notary: -2- · ' ~ Division of Cle~ Water ~o~ms . · p.O. Box 9~212 ...... CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REspONsIBILI .. " ' ' FOR ~DERGRO~D~TO~GE T~ CONTA~G pETROLE~ A. I m required to demommte Fin~cial Responsibili~ in ~e Required amoun= as ~ecified in Section 2807, CMpter 18, Div: 3, Title 23, CCR:· : · " · ~ :. · ' 500,000 dolla~ per oCc~ence · I million doll=s a~ ag~gam · 1. ~llion.dollm per occ~ence 2 mllion dollm ~u~ a~gate · B. (~=m~' et r=n~ Owner' or O~mtor) ' " hereby Ceases that it is in compliance with the mquimmen= of Section 2807, A~icle 3, Chapter ~ 8, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regula~ons . The m~chanisms used to demonstrate financial responsibil~ as required by Section 2807.am as ~lloWS: ' . ' Sate UST F~d Sate UST Cle~up F~d N/A $995:000 per · C°minuom Yes Yes Pi O. Box 944212 occ~ence ~d Sac~ento,..CA ~ua] ag~egate ' ' 942~-2120 Chief Fin~cial Valero Ener~ Co~oration N/A $1,000,000 per ~ua] Yes Yes Officer Le~er One Valero Place occ~nce and S~ Antonio, TX ' a~ua] ag~egate . · .... 78212-3186 .... Guar~tee Valero Ener~ Co~°ration N/A $],000,000 Per ~ua] - Yes Yes . One Valero Place ' . occ~enc¢ ~d S~ Antonio, TX - · ?8212-3186 Note: If you a~ using the ~ate Fund as any pa~ of your demonstration of financiol reSPonsibil~, YOur execution and submission of this ce~fication also ce~es that you are in compliance with all cond~ions for pa~icipa~on in the Fund. D. · Fa~li~ Name Facili~ Address · See a~ched list. . . Facil~ Name - . Facili~ Address . Faali~ Name ~ - Faali~ Addm~ . E. Signa~re ~ Tank ~ner or Operat~ Date Name and ~ae of Tank O~er or Opemt°r ' ~~~ ¢~ J°~ D' Gibb°n' ' Executive Vice President ~d Chief Fin~cia' Officer ~ure oLWi~s or No~ :' Da~ · Name of W~ess or No~ CFR ~edsed ~/95) FILE: OH~nal - ~eal Agency ' . Copies - Faeffi~/Site(s) . T:~CONSTRUC\O&EADMIN\REpoRT~ 1\01CACTNY.RPT 1 Valero Energy. Corporation Fiscal Year 2002 Financial Assurance - Retail UST -' 4/14/2003 .STORE # STATUS ZONE. ADDRESS , CITY STATE COUNTY CAPACITY PRODUCT FACILITY ID # 3074 O 352 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD BAKERSFIELD CA KERN 20068 D 00719 10140 p 00719 14130 U 00719 January 22, 2003 Beacon Truck Stop FIRE CHIEF 3225 Buck Owens Blvd RON FRAZE Bakersfield CA 93308 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ]:~: Upgrade Certificate & Fill Tags VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Dear Owner/Operator: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Effective January 1, 2003 Assembly Bill 2481 went into effect. This VOICE (661) 326-3941 Bill deletes the requirement for an upgrade certificate of compliance FAX (661) 395-1349 (the blue sticker in your window) and the blue fill tag on your fill. PREVENTION SERVICES FIRE SAFELY SERVICES · ENVIRONMENTAL SERYICE$ 1715 ChesterAve. Youmay, if you wish, have them posted or remove them. Fuel eakersl~e~d, CA ~.'.~1 vendors have been notified of this change and Will not deny fuel VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 delivery for missing tags or certificates. PUBLIC EDUCATION 1715 ChestorAv*. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 661- Bakemfield, CA 93301 326-3190. VOICE (661) 326-3696 FAX (661) 326-0576 · FIRE INVESTIGATION °' ,y°:ncere~"' 1715 Chester Ave. VOICE (661) 326-3951 / / FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION Steve Underwood 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer VOICE (661) 399.4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Officeof Environmental Services 'SBU/dc @0?4 J225 BUCK OWENS BAKERS?IELD.OA 9JJ08 664 J24-94@1 OOT 30, 2002 i:16 PM SYSTEM STATUS REPORT ALL FUNC IO S-N R A£ - INVENTORY REPORT T i:DIESEL 2 VOLUME = 1551j GALS ULLAGE = 4495 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 2494 GALS TC VOLUME = 15378 GALS HEIGHT = 92.41 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0,00 INCHES TEMP = 79,2 DEG F T 3:UNLEADED REG VOLUME = 10890 GALS ULLAGE = 3240 GALS 90~ ULLAGE= 1827 GALS TC VOLUME = 10757 GALS HEIGHT = 68.58 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0.00 INCHES TEMP = ??.4 DEG F T 4:UNLEADED PLUS VOLUME = 255? ULLAGE = ?582 90% ULLAGE= 6568 GALS TC VOLUME = 2516 GALS HEIGHT = 28,61 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0,00 INCHES TEMP = 82.8 DEG F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ END ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME {3e_atet0~\ -~-Pd¥./t. ~-~o,/) ~SPECTION DATE tO '30 '0 ~ ADD,SS 3~ ~cIC- ~t~ h{~ PHONE NO..~q~[ FACILITY CONTACT BUSINESS ID NO. 15-210- ~SPECTION TIME NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ~ ~[ Section 1: Business Pinn nnd Invento~ Progrnm ~ Routine ~ Combined ~ Joint Agency ~ Multi-Agency ~ Complaint ~ Re-inspection OPERATION C V COMMENTS Appropriate permit on hand '~, Business plan contact information accurate Visible address Correct occupancy Verification of inventory materials Verification of quantities Verification of location Proper segregation of material Verification of MSDS availability Verification of Haz Mat training /' Verification of abatement supplies and procedures Emergency procedures adequate Containers properly labeled Housekeeping Fire Protection '/ Site Diagram Adequate & On Hand C=Compliance V=Violation Any hazardous waste on site?: [~] Yes 'x~ No E xp.ain: ~..~o.~,,~ Questions regarding this inspection? Please call us at (661) 326-3979 U-~usiness Site ~esponsible,p~'rty White-Env. Svcs. Yellow - Station Copy Pink - Business Copy Inspector: ~_., (~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME P-lt'/lct3['~ -["i'Or_ft~ ,~"~O INSPECTION DATE ! i0 '.~)' O~ Section 2: Underground Storage Tanks Program [] Routine ~'Combined [] Joint Agency [] Multi-Agency [] Complaint [] Re-inspection Type of Tank ~(0 ~-d~ Number of Tanks '~ Type of Monitoring dl_/~ Type of Piping [)Bt'Z' OPERATION C V COMMENTS Proper tank data on file Proper owner/operator data on file Permit tees current "/ ' Certification of Financial Responsibility Monitoring record adequate and current Maintenance records adequate and current Failure to correct prior UST violations Has there been an unauthorized release? Yes No Section 3: Aboveground Storage Tanks Program TANK SIZE(S) AGGREGATE CAPACITY Type of Tank Number of Tanks OPERATION Y N COMMENTS S?CC available SPCC on file with OES Adequate secondary protection Proper tank placarding/labeling Is tank used to dispense MVF? If yes, Does tank have overfill/overspill protection? C=C°mpliance ,4 V=Violation Y=Yes N=NO Office of Environmental Services (805) 326-3979 Business Site Responsible Party White - Env. Svcs. Pink - Business Copy O California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control BOard Winston II. tlickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor · Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~nvqeb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 3 SePtember 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T1'5000447 Mr. Robert Fishbum 525 W. Third Street Hanford, CA 93232 UNDERGROUND sToRAGE TANK RELEASE AT BEACON STATION NO. 596, 3225 BUCK OWENS DRIVE (PIERCE ROAD), BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY you ,submitted.. Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quqrter.2002 (Monitoring Report) · dated 18 JulY2002 .a~..d Well Destruction. Report dated I9 July 2002. Horizon Environmental, Inc.~.E1 'D6rad6 Hills (Hodgon) prepared the rep0rtsl The.M0nit°ring~RePort' describes.the' results ~f thel [... 'mOrfit0rifi~'e~eiit cohdUct~d on'23 April 2002. The Well Des~-u~t~on Rep°rt d0cumen~s the'deStruction, '°fraonit°ring~and:soil,V~p0r extraction. (s~ ~VE)~ell's' 6n"io!une'20021-.i~q~. approved th~"weil. dest~ucti'°n~ by' °ur;ietter' ~iated 8 ~i5~:ii 2002: Dhring 'a meei~ng with you ahd'h~fizon personnel on 21 February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation of the high concentrations 'of diesel-range petrOleum hydrocarbons detected in one monitoring well. We request that groundwater, monitoring continue one additional quarter using the three remaining monitoring' wells. Summaries of the Monitoring Report and Well Destruction Report and our comments follow. Monitoring Report Summary .Doul0s Environmemal.Company conducted the Second Quarter 2002 .groundwater monitoring event on 23 April 2002. Depth-to-water measurements and groundWater samples were collected from monitOring wells MW-5 through MW-7. Depth-to-groundwater during the monitoring event ranged from 28.79 to 29:i4 feet below the top of the casings (feet TOC). The water table elevation declined, approximately 0.6:feet 'since the 22 January 2002 monitoring event. Horizon calculated groundwater flow~ direction to be toward the southwest. Groundwater samples Were sub~aitt6d t;Kiff AnalYtiCal, DaX*iS.('Ki~f), a. ha~ard~u~':w'~ste laboratory certified by the State '6f California. Sh~fi~ple~s"Were· analyzed;for total 'peti6i~n~ fiydr'0c~b0nsI as-gasoline (TPH-g)-and' to~al '~tr01eurii h~drocarbons as di~l (TPH~d).. by~ EPA method 801.5M, ,~md be.hzene, ' t~l~iei~e; ~th~lbenzen~i.xYienes,'meihyl.'tert~ary butyi:~;6-~".(g~l~X' and ~TBiE)' ¢~EPA meth0d,8260B.. The' sample from MW-6Was al~0'ar/alyzed for ~emivolatile 0r'ganic compounds'. (SVOCs) by; EPA.; MethOd 8270. ..... "' ' ¥': ~ :' ' .... "" .... California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swmb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Robert Fishbum 2 3 September 260~-~ · TPH-g. and TPH-d xve[e detected in MWr6 at 1,700 and 29,000 gg/L, respeCtively, this quarter.' TPH-g and TPHzd concentrations detected during the.First Quarter 2002: monitoring event were'4,500 and · · 60,000 gg/L. TPH-d concentratiOns detected in MW-6 increased from 32,000 [tg/L during the Fourth Quarter of 2000 to 130,000, 230,000, 180,000, and 130,000 gg/L, during the First, Second, Third, and,. Fourth Quarters of 2001,'respectively. The SVOCs fluorene and phenanthrene were 'detected in MW26' at ~7 and 44 gg/L, respectively. MW-6 is downgradient of the former and present diesel USTs. TPH-g and TPH-d was detected at 410 and 140 gg/L in MW-7. MW-7 is north of the former and present diesel USTs and the former gasoline USTs.. Benzene was detected in MW-6 at 0.72 gg/L. Analytes were not detected in MW-5. Well Destruction Report Summary ~'¥~'-b~Y0~-J~0~:¢} ~~ ~)i~illin~C~y~-~., ~r~sn° (Dyn~c). The WOrk was performed under a well destruction permit issued by the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHD). The well destruction was in accordance with California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 74-90 (California Well Standards) and KCEHD requirements. Neat cement grout was placed in the well casings under pressure with a tremie'pipe to ground surface until the grout surface elevation stabilized. The wells were then drilled out to approximate!y 2 feet below ground surface and backfilled with concrete. The well boxes will be removed when the area is repaved. Comments TPH-d concentrations greater than 100,000 ~g/L were detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-'6 during the First through. Fourth Quarters of 2001. TPH-d concentrations in MW-6 have decreased to 60,000 and 29,000 lxg/L duringthe First and Second Quarters of 2002, respectively. During our meeting with youand Horizon personnel'on 21 February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation to determine the source of the elevated diesel concentrations. We request that one additional quarter of monito?ing be performed. We will consider site closure following our review of the Third Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring data from MW-5 through MW-7. Please submit the results of the Third Quarter ~2002~monitoring-event- by ~17~October2002:-- '~-~ ~ .... Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8260B. The sample collected from MW-6 should also be.analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270. Final copies of the EPA 8270 analysis for MW-6 were not provided in the Monitoring Report. Please submit the analytical reports by 17 October 2002. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground ·Storage Tanks were added to the CalifomiaCode of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter,~ we have not received the required electronic data submissions for your site. U:\UGTLIDW_filesL2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\Beacon #596 GW 8-02.doc -~-~Mr. Robert Fishbum 3 3 September 2002 Please contact this office at'least.five days in advance of fieldwork. Shouldyou have ~n'y-ques~i0ns.. regarding this mat, ter, please., contact me 'at (559) 445-5504."' JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.Gi No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. _B_arbaraRe_mp_e!, US_T__Cleanup Fund,.Sacramento, w/o-enclosure ~- ...<. ' Mr. Howard Wines llI, Bakersfield Fire Department~ Bakersfield, w/o enclosur'~ Mr. Rexford Smith, Horizon Environmental Inc., E1 Dorado Hills, w/enclosure U:\UGTLIDW_filesL2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases~Beacon #596 GW 8-02.doc ~~/28/2002 16:31 1209365i543 TANKNOLOGY PAGE 01/01 \7 Tanlcn o Facsimile Cover Sheet To: UST Inspector COMPANY: City of Bakersfield Phone: Fax: 661-326-0576 From: CINDY Company: Tanknology Phone: 209-365-1246 Fax: 209-365-1543 Date: 8~28-02 Pages including 1 this cover page: Comment: Notification to perform compliance testing Tanknology has scheduled to perform the leak detector testing only at Ultramar Station #3074 3225 Buck Owens, Bakersfield _%~, 17 This test is scheduled to be performed on September 9, 2002 If you have any questions or would like to be on site, please contact our office at 209-365-1246 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message 18 intertded for the uee of the Individual or e~l~ Mr ~tch it M edd~d and may con. In Info~a~n that 19 f~al~ pdvll~, ~fl~.l, and e~ ~ dlScl~um, If ~e ~der ~ ~ls m~ge Is n~ the I~nd~ ~lpMn~ you em hem~ n~ th~ aW dl~mln~on, d~rlbuUon, or cowing of thls communl~lon i9~ pmhib~. ~you mcelv~ ~ls communi~iofl In o~r, pleaee n~ us lmm~la~ly by ~lephon~ to arrange ~r ~ ~um ~ ~e oTIginal me~rl~l. Th~nk youl TANKNOLOGY-NDE 1420 W. KE~LE~N ~E, STET. LODI, ~ 95242 (800)~01~ (2~)~12~ F~ (2~)36~1~3 08/12/02 ..... MON 15:23 FAX 583 3282 ULTRA~IAR [~002 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 45~1459 TEST RESULT. SITE SUMMARY REPORT Line and Leak Detector Tests ' 87 3 ~LE~ED 0.003 P Y P Y 89 4 PLUS 0. 003 P Y P " Y 20k 6 DIESEL 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.003 P P P P Y Y F F Y 20k 7 DIESEL ~0.003 0.003 P P Y Tanknology appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the £uture. Please call any time, da)' or night, when you need us. Tanknology representative: Test conducted by: MARK SHAW MICHAEL T LEVESQUE Reviewed: Technician Certification Number: ? 6 9 5 0 0 2 Printed 07/22/2002 17:23 KOHLMEYER 24 $.2..s..2 ULTRAMAR 003 .INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS TEST DATE:07/1-8/02 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER2223023 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 SiTE:ULTi~J~,M~R 074 CLIENT;ULTR3~%~ INC Tank ID: 87 3 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: !40.5 Product: Zj-Z~E~DED Vent manifolded: xes Bottom to grade in inches: 146.0 Capacity in gallons: 14,139 vaPOr recovery manifolded: YEs Fill pipe length in inches: 44.5 Diameter in inches: 95.00 Overfill protection: '/ES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 337 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: ])uA[, Material: DW STEEL Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST cP installed on: / / COMMENTS Start (in) End (in) New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failedlreplaced Dipped Water Level: L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 LD. #2 Dipped Product Level: Make: R~.D JACX~-T Probe Water Level: Model: t,z~ Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage S/N: 3,3.17965339 Test time: Open time in sec: 3. oo Inclinometer reading: HOlding psi: z3 NOT VacuTect Test Type: NOT Resiliency in mi: 13 0 TESTED VacuTect Probe Entry Point: TESTED Test leak rate mi/m: [sg. o Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: ~ Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo Water table depth in inches: Results: Pxss Determined by (method): Result: COMMENTS COMMENTS Material: DW FIBERG Diameter (in): 2. o Length (ft): 3o. o Test psi: so Bleedback cc: 11o Test time (min): 3 o NOT NOT NOT Start time: o 9: 15 TESTED TESTED TESTED End time: 09:45 Final gph: o. oo3 Result: PAss : Pump type: ~]~ESSURE Pump make: RED JAC](ET COMMENTS Impact VaNes Operational: YEs Printed 07~22~2002 17:23 08/12/02 MON 15:26 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ~004 INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS TEST DATE: 07 /3.8 /0 2 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER22 2 3023 CLiENT:Gt. Ti~a~r.2b~ TNC AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 SITE:OLTR2~c,-J~ 074 Tank ID: 89 ~, Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to Lop'fill in inches: 138.5 ~ Product: ~LUS Vent manifolded: YES Bottom to grade in inches: 145.0 Capacity in gallons: 10,1.3 9 Vapor recovery manifolded: YES Fill pipe length in inches: 42. S Diameter in inches: 95. oo Overfill protection: YEs Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 33? Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: DUA~. Material: DW STEEL InstalledI ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST CP installed on: / / COMMENTS Start (in) End (in) New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Dipped Water Level: ED. #1 L,D, #1 LD. #2 L.D. ~ Dipped Product LeVel: Probe Water Level: Make: RED ~AC]~ST Model: Fxx Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage S/N: ~s3~ Test time: Open time in sec: 3. oo Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: [[ VacuTect TeSt Type: ~OT Resiliency in mi: [3s Z~OT Yacu'i'ect Probe Entry Point: TESTED Test leak rate mi/m:' ~s~. o TESTED Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: ~o Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: · 3 .o0 Water table depth in inches: Results: ~Ass Determined by (method): .~ Result: COMMENTS COMMENTS Material: DW FIBERG Diameter (in): 2.0 Length (fL): 30.0 Test psi: 50 Bleedback cc: 3.00 Test time (min):; 30 NOT NOT NOT Start time: 09: 15 TESTED TESTED TESTED End time: 09: 45 Final gph: o. 003 Result: Pump type: PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: YES Printed 07/22/2002 17:23 08/12/02 MON 15:27 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ~005 INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILD1NG 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER2223023 TEST OATE: 0'7/18/02 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 SlTE:UnTRAY~E 0'74 CLIENT: UT,TRAtW-~R Tank ID: 20k ' 6 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inche~s: 3.93.0 Product: D'rESE~. Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to grade in inches: 201.0 Capacity in gallons: 20,068 Vapor recovery manifolded: NO Fill pipe length in inches: 64.0 Diameter in inches: 129. oo Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Length in inches: 3S8 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: NON~ Material: Dw STILE*, installed: ATe Stage It vapor recovery: NONS CPinstalled on: / / COMMENTS Lines b, c, d and a & b foxnn tank ~7 are all stilite lines. Start (in) End (in) New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Dipped Water Level: L.D. #1 L.D. Dipped Product Level: Make: v~u~o~,sss vAPo~,.~ss Probe Water Level: Model: LD2000 T,D2000 Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage S/N: Test time: Open time in sec: Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: VacuTectTest Type: NOT Resiliency in mi: VacuTect Probe Entry Point: TESTED 'est' leak rate mi/m: [sg. o ~s~. o Pressure Set Point Metering psi: Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo 3. oo Water table depth in inches: Results: FAT~. ~A~. Determined by (method): Result: COMMENTS ' Material: DW FIBERG DW FIBE~ DW FIBERG DW FIBERG Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Length (ft): 220.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Test psi: .so 5o 50 5o Bieedback cc: 275 65 55 60 Test time (rain): 30 3o 3o 3o Start time: lO: 30 11: 40 11: 40 12: 15 End time: 11: oo 12 = 10 12: 10 12: 45 Final gph: 0. 006 0. 003 0. 003 0. 003 Result: PASS PASS PASS PASS Pump type: PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET COMMENTS impact Valves Operational: YES Printed 07/2~/2002 17:23 08/12/02 MON 15:28 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR [~006 INDIVIDUAL TANK INFORMATION AND TEST RESULTS 8900' SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER22230 23 , '. TEST DATE:07/18/02 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 {512)451-6334 SlTE:ULTRJ~v~R 074 CLI ENT:OLT~I~R TNt Tank lO: 20k , 7. Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 193.0 Product: DIESE~. Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to grade in inches: 201'. 0 Capacity in gallons: 20,000 Vapor recovew manifolded: .No Fill pipe length in inches: 64.0 Diameter in inches: 129.00 Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 , Length in inches: 3 57 Overspill protection: YEs Stage I vapor recovery: NONE Material: DW STEEL Installed: AT(~ Stage ~1 vapor recovery: NONE CP installed on: / COMMENTS this tank does not exist, it is. put in only to be abl~ to show all of the satellite lines for the diesel tank. Start (in) End (in) New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Dipped Water Level: LD. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 LD. #2 Dipped Product Level: Make: Probe Water Level: ' Model: Ingress Detected: Water Bubble ' Ullage S/N: Test time: Open time in sec: Inclinometer reading: Holding psi: VacuTect Test Type: NOT Resiliency in mi: NOT NOT VacuTect Probe Entry Point: TESTED Test leak rate mi/m: TESTED TESTED Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: Water table depth in inches: Results: Determined by (method): Result: COMMENTS COMMENTS Material: DW F:[EE~,¢ DW F'rBER(~ Diameter (in): 3.0 3.0 Length (fi): 20.0 20.0 Test pSi: 50 50 Bleedback cc: 60 55 Test time (min): 30 30 NOT NOT Stad time: 12: 15 13: 00 · TESTED TESTED End time: 12: zi5 13: 30 Final gph: o .oo3 o. 003 ,~. Result: PASS PASS Pump type: pR~.s sz.mE PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET RED JACKET COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: YES Printed 07/22/2002 17:23 08/12/02 MON 15:29 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR [~007 SITE DIAGRAM 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 WORK ORDER NUMBER2223023 TEST DATE: 07/18/02 CLiENT:ULTR~ INC SITE: ULTR2~Z_~ 074 C-STORE ENT 0 O0 VENTS #3 Ultramar #51-4 (~ 3225 Pierce Rd. lCAR WASH ~ Bakersfield, CA DSL Printed 07/22/2002 17:23 KOHLMEYER 08/12/02 MON 15:30 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ~008 Work Order: 2223023 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 08/12/02 MON 15:30 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ......... ~009 Work Order: 2223023 r, .r: ---~-'2 - - Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 08/12/02 MON 15:30 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ~]010 ,IITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION ~,i-~ 'r~l~ For Use By All Jurisdictions Within the State of California Authority Cited: Chapter 6. 7, Health and Safety COde; Chapter 16, Division 3 Title 23, California Code of Regulation~s This form must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment, If more than one monitoring system controi panel is installe~t At the facility, a separate certification or repo~ must be prepared for each monitorinq s~stem control panel by the technician who pedorms the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner/operator. The owner/operator must submit a copy of this form to B,e local agepcy regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date. A. GeneralJnformation City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93301 Facility Name: ULTRAMAR 074 Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Contact Phone No: 324-9481 HWY 99/HVVY 58 Date of Testing/Service: 07/18/2002 Facility Contact Person: Manager Make/Model of Monitoring System: GILBARCO EMC Work Order Number: 2223023 B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected/serviced Tank ID: REG Tank ID: DSL ~ Z'~ In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: 847380-109 _ In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: 847380-109 X~ Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 794390-4;~0 Annular space or Vault Sensor. Model: 794390-420 -~ Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 794380-208 ~ Piping Sump/TrenchSensor(s). Model: 794380-208 Model: ' '-~ Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model; . Fill Sump Sensor(s). Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: LD-2000 (2) ~] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FX1V ~ Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: ~'~ Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: 61SO [] Tank OverfiillHigh-Level Sensor. Model: 61SO Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2), 3 Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). X~ In-Tank Gauging probe. Model: 847380-109 --'] ~n-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 794390-420 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: X---] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s), ' Model: 794380-208 Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: [] Fill Sump Sensor(s), Model: [] Fill Sump Sensor(s), Model: [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: FX1V [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: ] Electronic Line Leak Detector. ' Model: ~ Electronic Line Leak Detecter. Mode[: ,Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: 61SO . Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). ' -"] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page D~Jispenser IL): ~ Dispenser ID: 10/11 [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: [] Shear VaNe(s), [] Shear Valve(s) [--~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). [~_ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). Dis----'~enserlD: 6/7 ~DispenserContainmentSensor(s). Model:_ ~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: ~_ Shear Valve(s). X~ ShearValve(s). [~ Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ~ Dispenser Coh[ainment Float(s) and Chain(s). Lp enser ID: Dispenser ID: 8/9 U Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: ~ Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: ~] Shear Valve(s). X'~ Shear VaNe(s). ' ~ Di~pe.~,or Containment Float(s) and Cha{n(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). * If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility. C. Certification I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected/serviced in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines. Attached to this certification is information (e.g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is correct. and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached a copy of the (Check all that apply): System set-up repor[; I-~ Alarm history report ~-~ PRINTED NAME:MIcHAEL T LEVESQUE SIGNATURE: COMPANY: Tanknol°gY PHONE NO: (800) 800-4633 page 1 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 08/12/02 MON 15:31 FAX 583 3282 ULTRA}IAR ~011 Monitoring System Certification Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: _ 07/18/2002 HWY 99/HWY 58 D. Results of Testing/Servicing · Software Version Installed:__ 7.03 Complete the following checklist: ls the audible alarm operationat? Is the visual alarm operational? Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? re all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other' equipment will not Interfere with their proper op__..~eration? ' ' If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? containment .... [fpYee~ e~ ~)hn t~?l~mS °ernSt '~ 'let ina~ rPs?'' ~d~) s~t~VeFor pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary monitoring system detects a lo,ak, fails to.._,op_e~amt~,~:~cet~e;terinC~sollrYs.d'sconne shut-down~ (check all that apply) II :5 p , i Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks add sensor failure/disconnection? [] Yes [] No For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the a arm trigger? % any monitoring eqvipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced' and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacemen arts in Section E, below. ~ found inside any secondary containment systems des!gned as dry systems'?. (,check all that apply) [] Product; [] Water..If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. ----'----'-'- Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. __--------- Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? * in Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. E. Comments: page 2 of 3 08/12/02 MON 15:32 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAMAR ~012 Monitoring System Certification Site Address: 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD. Date of Testing/Service: 07/18/2002~ HWY 99/HWY 58 F. In-Tank Gauging i SIR Equipment [] Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. [] Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Complete the following checklist: Has all input wiring been inspected for proper.entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? _----------- . Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? of system water level readings tested? ~ Were all probes reinstalled properly? Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? * In the Section H, below, descdbe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. G, Line Leak Detectors (LLO): [] Check this box if LLDs are not instal]ed. Complete the following checklist: For equipment stsrt-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? · (Check a~l that apply) Simulated leak rate: [] 3 g.p.h [] 0.1 g.p.h E~0.2 g.p.h ~Vere all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory re'quirements? Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if_ it detects a leak? For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? ~ "~ electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? F%r electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? W"-~re all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H. Comments: :Michae~ .VR Cert# 5505 TanknoloAy._~.ontractors Lic# 743160 page 3 of 3 July 30, 2002 Valero Energy 3225 Buck Owens Blvd Bakersfield CA 93308 REMINDER NOTICE FIRE CHIEF RE: Necessary Secondary Containmen(Testing Requirements by December RON FRAZE 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank (s) Located at ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES the Above Stated Address. 2101 "H' Street. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Dear Tank Owner / Operator: FAX (661) 395-1349 If you are receiving this letter, you have not yet completed the necessary SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street secondary containment testing required for all secondary containment Bakersfield, CA 93301 components for your underground storage tank (s). VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Senate Bill 989 became effective January l, 2002, section 25284.1 (California PREVENTION SERVICES Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary FIRE SJ~FETY SERVICES · ENV1RONMENTJU. SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. containment components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to insure Bakersfield, CA 93301 that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 containment until they are detected and removed. PUBLIC EDUCATION Of great concern is the current failure rate of these systems that have been 1715 Chester Av~. Bakersfield, CA 93301 tested to date. Currently the average failure rate is 84%. These have been due VOICE (661)326-3696 to the penetration boots leaking in the turbine sump area. FAX (661) 326-0576 For the last four months, this office has continued to send you monthly FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 ChestorAve. reminders of this necessary testing. This is a very specialized test and very few Bakersfield, CA 93301 vOiCE (66~) 326-395~ contractors are licensed to perform this test. Contractors conducting this test FAX (661)326-0576 are scheduling approximately 6-7 weeks out. ~ TRAINING DIVISION The purpose of this letter is to advise you that under code, failure to perform 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 this test, by the necessary deadline, December 31, 2002, will result in the vOICE (661) 399-4697 revocation of your permit to operate. FAX (661) 399-5763 This office does not want to be forced to take such action, which is why we continue to send monthly reminders. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (661) 326-3190. Steve Underwood "-" Fire Inspector Environmental Code Enforcement Officer 87/18/2882 89:43 2093~515~43 T~NKNOLOGY _ P~GE 01 07/1o,/02 09:35 '~6~1 ,~26 0576 [~FD ]{AZ MAT DI%' ~ () ~'~ 2 2, 2002 c';,,, of Bakersfield Haz Mat'l Division ~-171'5 'ch~gf~r'Ave, SI~ 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Steve Underwood Dear Mr Underwood: Tanknology will be performing the line, leak detector and monitor certification at Ultramar Station #3074: 3225 Pierce Road, Bakersfield THE TEST WILL BE PERFORMED ON JULY 18~ 2002. If you have any questions or concerns, please comact me at (209)365-1246 Respec~tfully, Mark Shaw Operations Manager Tanknology TANKNOLOGY 1420 W KETTLEMAN LANE, STE T, LODI CA 95242 PHONE 209-365-1246 FAX 209-365-1543 ...........4C.o_8 .- CERTIFICATE. OF LIABILITY INSURANC _ '.PRODUCER, '. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MAI~ER OF INFORMATION o~- [ ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE $~.~e~ & Gordon Ins. ~.gency HOLDE.~. THIS CEI~T1FICATE DCE$ NOT'AMEND, EXTEND OR 1500 CityWest, Ste. 547 ALTER THE COVHRAGE AFFOROED BY THF. POLICIES BELOW. Houston iTX 77042 "' INSURERS AFFORDING covEI~AGE ?kone: 713-952~9990 Fax: ~.13-952-9~39 I~U~£O ~ : ,~ssuF,~.%. Commerc~ and Indust~' Ins. Co. '= , ~s0a~. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. '~Tankno lo~-~E International , ................. : COVE~GES T~E POLiCIE~ OF INSU~NCE L[STEO BElOw HAVE ~EEN ISSUED 'TO THE INSUEED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POL ~CY ;~ER~O0 IN~ICATEO. NO~ITHSTANDING AN~ ~Q,jIR~M~NT, T~RM OR CONDiTiON CF ~NY CONTRACT OR OTHE~ DOCUMENT WITH ~ESPECT TO WHICH THi~ CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HA%'~ BEEN REDUCED ~Y pAiD C~IMS A ~ X COU~'~C~,~C~E~tUAmU~ G~4177302 '10/25/01 ' ~0/25/02 FIREOAMACE(AnyCnee're) ..... ~ ....... } ~ ~-'-1 ~ . ; CL.A~MS MADE X OCC1;R MED EXP (Any one pe:'~on) $ ~, 000 GENE~AL'AGGREGATE , , i ' , ..................... ~ ......... ~ .................... G~N'L AG~P,~ATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ' PRODUCT~ - COMP/DP A~G r ........ i PRO- .... 'POLICY ', ~ jECT LOC AUTOMO~ILE'[IABI~I~ COMBINEO ~INGLE LIMIT' A ~5053'073/OS 10/25/01 10/25/02 (~,:c,~en,; $ [,000,000 ..... I ~,~ 6WN~O ~UTOS CAE053072/TX 10/25/01 i0/25/02 ~ r ............................ BODILY INJURY ~ H~e6 AUTOS ' EODILY rNjURY '"' "~ NON-~WNED AUTOS (Per X 'MC -90 ~o~r'r 0A~A~e ' · ,, ~. ', AUTO ONLY: , OTHER A ~ Pollution and 'COPS4760476 ~0/25/0! !0/25/02 2,000,000 'Occurrenc~ ~ ~rro~s & ~ssions 2,000,000 Agg~gat~ DESCRIPTION OF OP~RA~ONS;LOCA~ONSNI [NICL~S/EXCLUSIONS AOgffO BY ~NDOR$~M~NT/$P~Ia~ ~ROVISlON$ : .- ., ............................... .. .... . CERTIFICATE HOLDER y A~OIT[CNAL INSURED: ~NEU~E~ LE~E~: .__ CANCELLATION ...... " o~'r~ TII~EO~ THE ISSOlNG INSURER WILL ENOE~VOR . ~ IMPCS~ ~0 OBlIGaTION OR LIA~ILI~ O~ ANY KIND UPON THE SENT BY: BONSALL PETROLEUk4 CONSTRUCTION,; 780 63i 0526; ,.~ JUN-iS-02 4:00PB; PAOE i BONSALL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. BOX 969, BONSALI., CA 92003-0969 (760) 631-0342 · Fax (760) 631-0526 CA I.IC./1682742 · AZ LIC. #163875 DATE: JUNE 18. 2002 TO: RALPH E, HUEY, BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) VIA FAX (661) 326 0576 FROM: LAURIE PERRAULT (760) 63t-0342 WE WILL BE PERFORMING THE SB 989 TESTING ON THE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AT THE STATIONS LISTED BELOW. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF ANY FURTHER NOTIFICATION IS REQUIRED BY YOUR AGENCY, THANK YOU. DATE OF STATION TESTING JOB NO. NO. ADDRESS I2002 2001-045 3074 3225 BUCK OWEN BLVD, BAKERSFIELD ~ gONgALL PETROLEUM ¢ONSTRUCTTON,; 760 631 0526; JUN-18-02 4:00PMi PAaE 2 BONSALL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTI()N, INC. KO. ~ox 969, BONSALL, C'.^ 92(~')3-0969 (760) 631-0342 · 1~'~ (760') 631-0526 CA LIC. #682742 · AZ LIC. #163875 989 PROCEDURES Scope of Work On site worktlow shall be developed to u~ximize efficiencies and may utilize separatc tcsting and repair crews or a single crew to provide both testing and repair services, hfitial testing will be conducted, leak points will be determined by the tester and/or their repair pemomlel, minor repairs will be performed while testing continues on remaining components'and testing will be rq~eatcd on repaired components. Contractors shall be held responsible for identification and correction of all accessible repairs or tbr communication of inaccessible repairs or repah's ouBid~ this scope of work to the customer within 2 days of completion of the testing. Accessible repairs are defined as repairs that can be made without excavation m' removal of dispensers. The contractor will be responsible for notifying the appropriate regulatory agency of a test at least 48 hours prior to testing using an approved t~rm. Pre-Testit~.,?_roccdurc~ · Disruption to the site operation will be mi~fi,nized. · Thc turbine sumps and dispenser pans will be clean, ed by removing any debris. We will use a small quantity of water and FM 186 to steam-clean the wails and sump bottom. Tl~e cleaning fluid will be rcmoved and containerized in a labeled ch'urn. · A II existing fluid will be removed from the sump or pan and containerized in a labeled clnun prior to cleaning. All equipment to be tested will be inspected for visible dtunag¢ proper to testing. · The contractor is rcsponslble for implementation of appropriate safety procedures that will be followed to insure aaf& operation of testing equipment. The contractor is responsible for r~laitltait~il',g the lleeessary sal'ety equipment on site to conduct the scope of work outlined in this proposal. Sumps may be considered confined spaces and shall be monitored for oxygen prior to entrance and testing. Work areas should be isolated with cones m' barriers and all personnel should wear sali:ty vests while working on site. · Thc monitoring system may be deactivated prior to testing. If the system is remote monitored, contractor will contact the remote monitoring service prior to deactivation. o Contractors responsible for notifying the appropriate agencies of thc test at least 48 hours prior to the schedules date &testing. Any questions regarding protocols or procedures to be used during · testing shall be referred to the ~oatcextor. SENT BY: BONSALL PETROLEUU CONSTRUCTION,; 760 631 0526; JUN-18-02 4:00PM; PAGE 3/5 Secondary Testing Pro?edures an,.d Criteria The following testillg and repair protocols and procedures have been developed as a minimum requirement based on manufacturer's recommendations and industry standard. The protocols may require modification based upon specific equipment requirements or local regulatory requirements. Dispenser Pans Shallow Pans: · Disconnect mechanical floats or remove sensors and place thetn in an area where they will not be disturbed during testing. · Rinse dispenser pan per the pre.testing procedures above, Inspect the fittings and tighten all compression fittings using the proper tool. Grease gaskets as needed to insure a fight seal. Check plugs in fitting test ports to insure that they are present and sealed. Inspect all ele¢Ixica[ penetrations to insm'e proper seals. If electrical penelxations are not scaled with a boot, use an approved sealant to fill the open penetration, Check all conduit junction boxes and seal offs for leaks and tighten or repair as needed. · Introduce testing fluid in the dispenser pan to one inch above the penetration fittings. · Using an accelerated testing device, test the dispenser ptms with the criteria fhr a passing test of .001-hxch drop in liquid level in 6 minutes. Deep Pans Disconnect mechanical floats or remove sensors and place them in an area wh~re they will not be disturbed during testing. · Rinse dispenser pan per the pre-testing procedures above. · Introduce mating fluid in the dispenser panto two inches above the product line penetration fittings. · Using an accelerated testing device, test the dlspcaser pans with the criteria for a passing test of .O01-inch drop in liquid level in 6 minutes, · Leaks found in deep dispenser pans, which require removal of the dispenser for repairs, shall bc reported to the customer. Turbine Sumps · Inspect turbine sumps for damage or probable failure points. SENT BY: 80NSALL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION,; 760 631 0526; JUN-tS-02 4:00PM; PAOE 4/5 · Inspect all penetrations that are to be L~sted to insure proper seals. Tighten penetration boots and clamps as needed to insure a tight seal. Minor leak points found during the visual inspect/on shall I~ repaired using an approved sealant, · Introduce testing fluid in the turbine sump to two inches above the product tine penetration firings, · Using an accelerated testing device, test the dispenser pans with the criteria for a passing test of ,002 inches drop in liquid level in 12 minutes. Fill Sumps Spill buckets shall not be tested unless required by tile regulatory agency. * Introduce testing fluid in the sump to a level two inches above the activation point of thc sump sensor, · Using an accelerated testing device, test the dispenser pans with the criteria for a passing test of .002 inches drop in liquid level in 12 minutes. Fiber Glass Product Piping Industry Standard may be utilized if regulatory agency determines that manufacturers criteria do not meet the regulatory agency rgquirements. Industry standard is 3-5 psi for one hour with an allowable drop of-,2psi. Sites with Flex Boots · Conduct a pneumatic test by introducing a pressure of 3-5 psi on the secondary piping using nitrogen. e The pressure should be monitored for any drop over a 30-minute period, The system has passed if the pressure drop is less than -.2 psi during the 30-minute test. Sites with no Flex Boots (Amcron) e Conduct a pneumatic test by introducing a pressure of 5 psi on the secondary piping using nitrogen, · The pressure should be monitored for any drop over a 30-minute period. Sites with No Flex Boots (Smith) · Conduct a pneumatic rest by introdu¢iog a pressure no to exceed 5 psi on the secondary piping using nitrogen, * The pressure should b~ monitored for any drop over a 30-minute period. SENT BY: BONgALL PETROLEUM CONgTRUCTION,; 780 63t 0528; JUN-18-02 4:01PM; PAGE Flexible Product Piping * Conduct a pneumatic test by introducing a presmre no to cxc~cd I 0 psi on the secondly piping using nitrogen. · The pressure should I~ monitored for any drop over a 1 -hour period, The passing criteria are no drop in pressure over the 1-hour test, Tanks Conduct a pneumatic test by introduchig a vacuum on the secondary. The test vacuum is based u~m the recommendation by the manufacturer as follows. o Industry s~andard may bo utilized, lndusUy standard is 10"we of vacuum for 1- hem' with an allowable change of 2"wc · X~rx~s: Pull 10 inches hg vacuum, allowed to stabilize for 3 minutes and test for one hour, Must hold 8 inches hg or more a~ ~e end of tl~e l-hour test to pass, - Owens Corning, Fluid Containmem, Total Containment: Pull 10 inches hg vacuum and test for 45 minutes. If drop exceeds 2 inches hg continue £o test for I additional hour, 'l'he maximum allowable drop over the entir~ extended test is 4 inches hg · leer: Pull 10 inches hg vacuum and test for one hour. Continue test for one additional hour. No degradation in the vacuum is allowed in the two-hour test per manufacturer's recommendation. · Modern Welding: Pull 7 inches vacuum and test for one hour, Mus[huldS.3 hg at the erM of the one-hour test, Waste Oil Tanks · Testing ofwa~ste oil tanks shall be completed per the specifications presented above. Spill Buckets · gpill buckets shall not be tested un]ess required by tile regulatory agency. Post T~sting Procedures · All testing fluid will be containerized and transported to the next t~st site to be used for testing as permitted by the California Health and Safety Cod~ Chapter 6,5, Article 2, Section 25116, which states~ "handling means the transportation or transferring from one place to another, or pumping, processing, storing, or packaging of hazardous waste, but does not include the handling of any substance before it becomes a waste." · Submittal of all tests shall be the responsibility of the contractor and passing lests shall be submitted within the 30 day allowed time period and in accordance with CUPA requests. Non- passing results shall be communicated to the customer prior to submittal of the test results to thc CUPA and within 2 days of'test completion. · Notify the customer immediately upon discovery of any components that have secondary contairm:ent but do not have test procedures defined in this scope of work. econ Containment Testing R rt Form ~his f~rm is intended f~r use by c~ntract~rs perf~rming peri~dic testing ~f UST sec~ndary c~ntainment systems. Use the appropriate pages of this form to report results for all components tested. The completed form, written test procedures, and printouts from tests (if applicable}; should be provided to the facility owner/operator for submittal to the local regulatory agency. /~'~ 1. FACILIT~ORMATION Facility/~itramar #3074 ~'~x,, [ Date.of Testing: 06/25/02 Faci,ii~y Address: 3225 Buck Owens Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Facil, ity Co_C.~ntact: Manager ~,/ [ Phone(661) 324-9481 Date ~o~cal Agen~"Was-Not-i-fiecLo_f_T. esting~2~----~'''/ Name of ~ocaL&g?.ncy Inspector Present: None 2. TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Bonsall Petroleum Technician Conducting Test: Ross Hines, Nick Patrick Credentials: X CSLB Licensed Contractor SWRCB Licensed Tank Tester License Type and #: A,B,HAZ #682742 : · Training by Manufacturer Manufacturer Component(s) Date Training Expires USTest UST2000P 12/03 3. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Number of Tanks Tested: 3 Number of Piping Runs Tested: 3 Number of Submersible Pump Sumps Tested: 3 Number of UDC Boxes Tested: 10 Number of Fill Sumps Tested:0 Number of Overfill Boxes Tested: 0 Component Pass Fail Comments T1 RU Annular X T2 SU Annular X T3 DSL Annular X L 1 RU Containment Line X L2 .SU Containment Line X L3 DSL Containment Line X T1 RU Turbine Sump X T2 SU Turbine Sump X T3 DSL Turbine Sump X UDC 1 SATTELITE X UDC 1-2 X UDC 2-3 X UDC 3-4 X UDC 4-5 X UDC 5 SATTELITE X UDC 6-7 X UDC 8-9 X UDC 10-11 X UDC 13-14 X Note: There is no number 12 UDC Technician's Signature: Ross Hines, Nick Patrick Date: 06/25/02 SWRCB December 2001 ~ ,* G~. Page of __ 4. 'l'Arnt~..qa'~'~ ~o, ,~t~ TESTIN ~ Test Method Developed By: X Tank Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Pressure X Vacuum Hydrostatic Test Method Uses: ,. Other (Specify) Measuring Equipment Used for Testing: Liquid Filled Vac Gauges Tank Capacity: t2000 ,0000 20000 Tank Material: Fibersteel Fibersteel Fibersteel Trusco Trusco Tank Manufacturer: Trusco Product Stored: RU SU DSL 15 MIN Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting 15M1N 15MIN test: 1205 Test Start Time: 0924 0921 -10"HG -10"HG Initial Reading (R0: - 10"HG Test End Time: 1024 1021 105 Final Reading (RF): -10"HG -1 I"HG -10"HG Test Duration: 1 HR 1 HR 1 HR Change in Reading (RF-R~): 0 + (-1.0") VAC 0 Pass/Fail Threshold: 2" 2" 2" Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Was sensor removed for testing? YES YES YES Was sensor properly replaced after YES YES YES testin ? ~~ ~ Comments - Did not test waste oil tank sump or annular - could not remove rusted pipe plug at top of annular. Also, 36" waste oil sump filled to the top with oil mixture, emitting foul smell. -- -¢-u.h /~ " December 200 SWRCB Page __ of __ 5. SECONDARY PIPE TESTING Test Method Developed By: X Piping Manufacturer Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Uses: X Pressure Vacuum Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Measuring Equipment Used for Testing: Liquid Filled Pressure Gauges . Piping Run #1RU ' Piping Run #2 SU [ Piping Run #3 DSL 'Piping Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Piping Manufacturer: Smith Smith Smith Piping Diameter: 3" 3" 4" Len~h of Piping Run: 100' 100' 300' Product Stored: RU SU DSL Method and location of 3X2 BOOTS 3X2 BOOIS 3X2 BOOTS piping-run isolation: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 15M1N 15MIN 15M1N starting test: Test Start Time: 0853 0850 1210 Initial Reading (R0: 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI Test End Time: 0923 0920 1240 Final Reading (Rr): 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI 5.0 PSI Test Duration: 30MIN 30MIN 30MIN Change in Reading (RF-Ri): 0 0 0 Pass/Fail Threshold: -.2 PSI -.2 PSI -.2 PSI Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing) December 200 SWRCB " '~ tJ~ Page .__ of__ ~. ~, E~x~,LE PUMP CONTAINMENT - -. TESTING Test Method Developed By: X Sump Manufacturer ' Industry Standard Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Uses: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) asurin E ui ment Used for Testing' UST 2000P ~ Sump # 3 DSL Sump Diameter: 42" 42" 46" Sump Depth: 45- 43" 68" Sump Material: FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS Height from Tank Top to Highest 11" 9" 12" Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 19" 16" 11" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to testing: FAIR FAIR DIRTY Portion of Sump Tested~ SEE NOTE # 1 SEE NOTE # 1 SEE NOTE # 1 Wait time between applying 15MIN 15MIN 15MIN pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: ' 0936 1000 1222 Initial Readihg (R0: .6581 .5210 .6732 Test End Time: 0948 1012 1234 Final Reading (R~): .06566 .5207 .6734 Test Duration: 12MIN 12MIN 12MIN Change in Reading (Rv-R0: -.0015 -.0003 +.0002 Pass/Fail Threshold: +/-.002" +/-.002" +/-.002" Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Was sensor removed for testing? YES _ YES YES . Was sensor properly replaced after YES YES YES testing? Comments - Note #1: Probe in top portion of water only. Waste oil tank suml~ was not tested because, it was found to be filled alx>roximatel¥ two inches (2"~ from the man way coyer'with waste oil mixtures That has a strong foul smell. Could not remove annular car~ r>lug usine chain wrench. December 200 SWRCB. Page of__ Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard Professional Engineer .' Other (Spec~) Test Method Uses: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Spec~) " Me~uring Equipment Used for Testing: UST 2000P ~ ~ ~ UDC ~1 SLAVE ! UDC ~ 1/2 I UDC ~ 2/3 UDC Manufacturer: B~VO B~VO B~VO UDC Material: FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL UDC Depth: 10" 10" I0" Height from UDC BoRom to BoRom of Box BoRom of Box BoRom of Box Highest Piping Pene~ation: Height from UDC BoRom to BoSom of Box BoRom of Box BoSom of Box Lowest Elec~ical Pene~ation: Condition of UDC prior to DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY testing: 2" ABOVE BOOT 2" ABOVE BOOT 2" ABOVE BOOT Potion of UDC Tested~ Wait time between applying ~ l 0 M~ ~ 10 M~ ~ l 0 MIN pressur&vacuu~water and sta~ing test: Test Sta~ Time: 536 525 427 Initial Reading (R0: .7040 .6405 .5890 Test End Time:' 542 531 433 Final Reading (R~): .7048 .6412 .5898 Test Duration: 6MIN 6M~ 6MIN Change in Reading (RF-R~): +.0008 +.0007 +.0008 Pass/Fail T~eshold: +/-.001 +/-.001 +/-.001 Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Was sensor removed for YES YES YES testing? Was. sensor properly replaced YES YES YES after testing? Comments -All diesel pans 12" x 11" x 27" All floats were removed for testin~ then revlaced - UDC had no sensors. December 2001 SWRCB ~ a .~ 0 ]~ Page__of__ 8.UNDER PENSER C NTAINMENT (U-DC) T G o ~x,v~ ~, .......... id 'Standard X I ustry Professional Engineer Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer Other (Specify) Test Method Uses: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Measuring Equipment Used for Testing: UST 2000P UDC # 3/4 I UDC # 4/5 [ UDC # 5 Slave UDC Manufacturer: BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO UDC Material: FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL UDC Depth: 12" 12" 12" Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY testing: 2" ABOVE BOOT 2" ABOVE BOOT 2" ABOVE BOOT Portion of UDC Tested~ Wait time between applying Gl0 MIN @10 MIN Gl0 MIN pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 413 246 257 Initial Reading (R~): .9771 .6349 .3798 Test End Time: 419 252 303 Final Reading (RF): .9765 .6340 .3793 Test Duration: 6MIN 6M1N 6MIN Change in Reading (Rv-R0: -.0006 -.0009 -.0005 Pass/Fail Threshold: +/-.001 +/-.001 +/-.001 Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Was sensor removed for YES YES YES testing? Was sensor properly replaced YES YES YES after testing? - Comments-All diesel pans 12" x 11''x 27" All floats were removed for testine then re[~laced - UDC had no sensors. December 2001 SWRCB ~ - ~ ~ Page__ of__ 9. UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAIN T (UDC) TESTING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer XIndustry Standard Professional Engineer Other (SpecifY) Test Method Uses: Pressure Vacuum X Hydrostatic . Other (Specify) Measuring Equipment Used for Testing: UST 2000P ~t UDC # 6/7 I UDC # 8/9 I UDC # 10/11 UDC Manufacturer: BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO UDC Material: FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL FIBERSTEEL UDC Depth: 12" 12" 12" Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Bottom of Box Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY testing: 2" Portion of LIDC Tested~ 2" ABOVE BOOT ABOVE BOOT 2" ABOVE BOOT Wait time between applying ~ 10 MIN ~ 10 MIN ~ 10 MIN pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 1115 1103 1142 Initial Reading (R~): .5311 .0350 .8604 Test End Time: 1121 1109 1148 Final Reading (Rv): .5314 .0345 .8598 Test Duration: 6MIN 6MIN 6MIN Change in Reading (RF-R0: +.0003 -.0005 -.0006 Pass/Fail Threshold: +/-.001 +/-.001 +/-.001 Test Result: PASS PASS PASS Was sensor removed for YES YES YES testing? Was sensor properly replaced YES YES YES after testing? Comments - All 89 and 87 octane pans 12" x 10" x 19" UDC pan floats were removed and then replaced. SWRCB December 2001 4' " D~- · (UD 'C~E Page __ of__ xu. t~n DISPENSER*CONTAINMENT STING Test Method Developed By: UDC Manufacturer X Industry Standard ' Professional Engineer Other (Specify) Test Method Uses: Pressure Vacuum' X Hydrostatic Other (Specify) Measuring Equipment Used for Testing: UST 2000P UDC Manufacturer: BRAVO UDC Material: FIBERSTEEL UDC Depth: 12" Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Highest Piping Penetration: Height from UDC Bottom to Bottom of Box Lowest Electrical Penetration: Condition of UDC prior to DIRTY testing: Portion of UDC Testedt 2" ABOVE BOOT Wait time between applying ~10 MIN pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time: 1129 Initial Reading (R~): ' .5935 Test End Time: 1135 Final Reading (RF): .5927 Test Duration: 6MIN Change in Reading (RF-R0: -.0008 Pass/Fail Threshold: ,~. +/-.001 Test Result: PASS Was sensor removed for YES testing? Was sensor properly replaced YES after testing? Comments- There was n° # 12 dispenser . December 2001 ' SWRCB D May 29, 2002 Valero Energy (Prev: Beacon Stop) Truck 3225 Buck Owens Bird Bakersfield, CA,93308 RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Requirement by December 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank located at 3225 Buck Owens Blvd FIRE CHIEF REMINDER NOTICE RON FRAZE Dear Tank Owner/Operator: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 The purpose of this letter is to inform you about the new provisions in California VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)395-1349 Law requiring periodic testing of the secondary containment of underground storage tank systems. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002. section 25284.1 (California Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3941 Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment FAX (661)395-1349 components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to ensure that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary containment until they are PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. detected and removed. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 Secondary containment systems installed on or after January 1, 2001 shall be tested upon installation, six months after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Secondary containment systems ihstalled prior to January 1 2001 shall be tested by 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 January 1, 2003 and every 36 months thereafter. REMEMBER!! Any component VOICE (661) 326-3979 that is "double-wall" in your tank system must be tested. FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION Secondary containment testing shall require a permit issued thru this office, and 5642 Victor Ave. shall be performed by either a licensed tank tester or licensed tank installer. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Please be advised that there are only a few contractors who sPecialize and have the proper certifications to perform this necessary testing. For your convenience, I .am enclosing a copy of the code for you to refer to. Once again, all testing must be done under a permit issued by this office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (661) 326-3190. Sincer ,ly, Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer SBU/kr enclosures V LERO ENERGY CORPORATION Post Office Box 696000 · San Antonio, Texas 78269-6000 Via UPS Overnight Express April 24, 2002 State of California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P. O. Box 944212 Sacramento, California 94244-2120 916-341-5700 - 916-341-5808 (F) Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Responsibility - Fiscal Year 2001 - LIST Facilities Enclosed are the documents for Valero Energy Corporation demonstrating financial assurance for Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities owned by specific subsidiaries of Valero. These documents, listed below, have been updated to include Valero Energy Corporation's financial data for fiscal year 2001. Please forward to the appropriate personnel within your agency. · Letter from CFO specifying the successful completion of the financial test of self- insurance. · Guarantee by Valero Energy Corporation on behalf of the specific Valero subsidiary(s) owning the USTs. · As addendum (list) that specifies the locations and tanks at each facility covered by these financial assurance mechanisms. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (210) 592-4235 or e-mail: j ohn.willrodt~valero.com. Very truly yours, Jo,.~.,.~ Willrodt, D}rector Retail Compliance JW/nak Enclosures V8159.p65 £N£RG¥ CORPOR/ ilION Post Of[i¢o [3ox 500 · San Antonio, -l-oxas 78202-0500 · Yelept~ono (210) 370-2000 2001CAdoc April 23, 2002 Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested State of California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P. O. Box 944212 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 Dear Madam or Sir: RE: UST Financial Assurance - Fiscal Year 2001 I am the Chief Financial Officer of Valero Energy Corporation (Valero) located at One Valero Place, San Antonio, Texas 78212-3186. This letter is presented to support the use of the financial test of self-insurance to demonstrate Valero's financial responsibility for taking corrective action and/or compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden accidental releases and/or non-sudden accidental releases in the amount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate arising from operating Valero's underground storage tanks. The underground storage tanks listed on the attached addendum are covered by this financial test or a financial test under an authorized State program applicable to Valero. A financial test is used by Valero to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in the following amounts under other EPA regulations or state progrfims authorized by EPA under 40 CFR parts 271 and 145: EPA Regulation: Closure (264.143 and 265.143) ...................... $ 8,856,651 Post-Closure Care (264.145 and 265.145) ..... $12,744,643 Liability Coverage (264. t 47 and 265.147) ..... $ 8,700,000 Corrective Action (264.101(b)) ................... J.. $ 2,800,221 Plugging and Abandonment (144.63) ............. $ 787,456 Total (1) ...............................$ 33,888,971 Authorized State Programs: Closure .......................................................... $ 771,840 Post-Closure Care ......................................... $ 303,502 Liability Coverage ........................... . .............. $ N/A Corrective Action ........................................... $ N/A Plugging and Abandonment .......................... $ N/A Total (2) ......................................... $1,075,342 Valero has not received an adverse opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a "going concern" qualification from Arthur Andersen LLP, its independent audit firm, on its financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. State of California State Water Resources Control Board Page 2 of 3 April 23, 2002 ALTERNATIVE II 1. Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage being assured by a financial test, anclJor guarantor ............................................................................. $2,000,000 2. Sum of current cost estimates for closure, post closure, corrective action, and liability coverage (total of (1) & (2) directly above) ........................ $34,964,313 3. Sum of lines 1 and 2 ........................................................................................... $36,964,313 4. Total tangible assets ................................................ ~. .................................... $11,799,921,000 5. Total liabilities (if any of the amounts reported on line 3 is included in total liabilities, you may deduct that amount from this line and add that amount to line 6) .............................................. .......... $10,174,533,000 6. Tangible net worth (subtract line 5 from line 4) ............................................ $1,625,388,000 7. Total assets in the U.S. (required only if less than 90 percent of Assets are located in the U.S ..................................................... $10,391,021,000 8. Is line 6 at least $10 million.'? .............................................................................. Yes 9. Is line 6 at least 6 times line 3.'? ........................................................................... Yes 10. Are at least 90 percent of assets located in the U.S..'? .......................................... No 11. Is line 7 at least 6 times line 3.9 ................. ~ ......................................................... Yes Fill in either Lines 12-15 or Lines 16-18. 12. Current assets .............................................................................. NA 13. Current liabilities ......................................................................... NA 14. Net working capital (subtract line 13 from 12) ....................................... NA 15. Is line 14 at least 6 times line 3? ......................................................................... NA 16. Current bond rating of most recent bond issue ................................................... BBB 17. Name of rating service ................................................................................. Standard & Poor 18. Date of maturity of bond ............................................................... 4-1-2032 19. Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with The SEC, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Electrification Administration.'? ........................................................................... Yes State of California State Water Resources Control Board Page 3 of 3 April 23, 2002 I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is ~dentical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.95 (d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown below. J~y Gibbons Wi[ness/b~ry Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date Date HONEY WEAYER-MOR[~O STATE ~ TEXAS Guarantee Guarantee made this April ~ ~, 2002 by Valero Energy Corporation, a business entity organized under the laws of the state of Texas, herein referred to as guarantor, to the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and to any and all third parties, and obligees, on behalf of Ultramar Inc. (UI), of P.O. Box 696000, San Antonio, Texas 78629°6000. Recitals. (1) Guarantor meets or exceeds the financial test criteria of 40 CFR 280.95 (b) or (c) and (d) and agrees to comply with the requirements for guarantors as specified in 40 CFR 280.96(b). (2) UI owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s)'covered by this guarantee: See addendum to this guarantee. This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, subpart H requirements for assuring funding for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by either sudden accidental releases or non-sudden accidental releases or accidental releases, arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. (3) On behalf of our subsidiary, guarantor guarantees to SWRCB and to any and all third parties that: In the event that UI fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the Director of the SWRCB has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon instructions from the Director, shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the Director determines that UI has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, subpart F, the guarantor upon written instructions from the Director shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If UI fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by sudden and/or non-sudden accidental releases arising from the operation of the above-identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the Director, shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108 to satisfy such judgment(s), award(s), or settlement agreement(s)up to the limits of coverage specified above. (4) Guarantor agrees that if, at the end of any fiscal year before cancellation of this guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet the financial test criteria of 40 CFR 280.95 (b) or (c) and (d), guarantor shall send within 120 days of such failure, by certified mail, notice to UI. The guarantee will terminate 120 days from the date of receipt of the notice by UI, as evidenced by the return receipt. (5) Guarantor agrees to notify UI by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, xvithin 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (6) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of UI pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (7) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as UI must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, subpart H for the above- identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to UI, such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by UI, as evidenced by the return receipt. (8) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the folloWing: (a) Any obligation of UI under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of UI arising from, and in the course of, employment by UI; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaded to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by UI that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily damage or property damage for xvhich UI is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption' of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93. (9) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by SWRCB, by any or all third parties, or by UI. I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is consistent with, and equivalent to, the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.96(c) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below. Effective date: ~L/~ / (A~fhorized signature for guarantor) (Name of person signing) · ........~:.....~~ (Title of person signing) '~ (Si~amre of wimess or nota~) .7 ~~ State of Calilbmia For State Use Only State of Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento. CA 94244-2120 (Instructions on reverse side) CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONTAINING PETROLEUM A. I am required to demonstrate Financial Rc.~ponsibility in the Required amounts as specHicd in Section 2807, Chapter 18. Div. 3, Title 23. CCR: 5(10,1}00 dollars per occurTcnce ) million dollars annual aggregate or AND ~t..~ or I million dollars per occurrence 2 million dollars annual aggregate B. Valero Energy Corporation hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Section 2807, {Name of Tank Owner or Operator) Article 3. Chapter 18. Division 3. 77tie 23, California Code of Regulations. The mechanisms used to demonstrate financial responsibility as required by Section 2807 are as follows: C. Mechanism Mechanism Coverage Coverage Corrective Third Party Type Name and Address of Issuer Number Amount Period Action Comp State UST Fund State UST Cleanup Fund N/A $995,000 per Continuous Yes Yes P.O. Box 944212 occurence and Sacramento, CA annual aggregate 94244-2120 Chief Financial Valero Energy Corporation N/A $1,000,000 per Annual Yes Yes Officer Letter One Valero Place occurcncc and San Antonio. TX annual aggregate 78212-3186 Guarantee Valero F_nergy Corporation N/A S1,000,000 per Annual Yes Yes One \":,[cro Place / occurencc and San Antonio, TX annual aggregate 78212-3186 Note: If you are using the State Fund as any part of your demonstration of financial responsibility, your execution and submission of this certification also certifies that you are in compliance with all conditions for participation in the Fund. D. Facility Name Facility Address Sec Attached List Facility Name Facility Address Facility Name Facility Address E. Name and Tide of Tank Owner or Operator Si~u~ of Tank Owner or ?~erator Date Signture of Witness or Notary Date Name of Witness or Notary CFR (Rev ;2) I ..;_,,~,~,,J~m..,~ '.~i~?h~l~,~ Copies - Facilily/Site(s} fi .,.~ HO~EYWEAVEP,-MORENO ~ ~ -~<'~ Notary Pubil~' ~. ~ ORIGINAL V~l~r~ £n~rg¥ C~rp~r~ti~n Fi$¢~1 Y~r 200~ Financial ~ur~n¢~ - R~t~il UST 4~2 STORE # STATUS ZONE ADDRESS CITY_ STATE COUNTY CAPACITY PRODUCT FACILITY ID # 3074 O 352 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD BAKERSFIELD CA KERN 20068 D 00719 10140 P O0719 14130 U 00719 ENERGY CORPORATION Post Offioo Box 090000 · San Antonio, Texas 78289-8000 Via Certified Mail April 24, 2002 Office of Emergency Services City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Sirs: Re: Financial Responsibility - Fiscal Year 2001 - UST Facilities Enclosed are the documents for Valero Energy Corporation demonstrating financial assurance for Underground Storage Tank' (UST) facilities owned by specific subsidiaries of Valero. These documents, listed below, have been updated to include Valero Energy Corporation's financial data for fiscal year 2001. Please forward to the appropriate personnel within your agency. · Letter from CFO specifying the successful completion of the financial test of self- insurance. ., · Guarantee by Valero Energy Corporation on behalf of the specific Valero subsidiary(s) owning the USTs. · As addendum (list) that specifies the locations and tanks at each facility covered by these financial assurance mechanisms. ShOuld you have any questions, please contact me at (210) 592-4235 or e-mail: j ohn.wilkodt~valero.com. Very truly yours, John Willrodt, Director Retail Compliance JW/nak Enclosures V8159.p65 D April 17, 2002 Beacon Truck Stop 3225 Buck Owens Blvd FIRE CHIEF Bakersfield CA 93308 RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Required by December 31, 2002 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3941 REMINDER NOTICE ' FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Tank Owner/Operator: 2101 ~H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 The purpose of this letter is to inform you about the new provisions in California law VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 requiring periodic testing of the secondary containment of underground storage tank systems. PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002. Section 25284.1 (California Health & Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment components FAX (661) 326-0576 upon installation and periodically thereafter, to ensure that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary containment until they are detected and removed. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Secondary containment systems installed on or after January 1, 2001 shall be tested upon VOICE (661) 326-3979 installation, six months after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. Secondary FAX (661) 326-0576 containment systems installed prior to January I, 2001 shall be tested by January 1, 2003 and every 36 months thereafter. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Secondary containment testing shall require a permit issued thru this office, and shall be VOICE (661) 399-4697 performed by either a licensed tank tester or licensed tank installer. FAX (661) 399-5763 Please be advised that there are only a few contractors who specialize and have the proper certifications to perform this necessary testing. For your convenience, I am enclosing a copy of the code for you to refer to. Once again, all testing must be done under a permit issued by this office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3190. Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer SBU/dm enclosures St~t= of Califon~ For St~' S~ of Wa~ ~ Con~l ~ Div~ion of ~ W~ ~ P.O. Box ~212 ~, CA ~2~2120 . CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILI ~R'~DERGROUND ~GE T~ CO~G P~OLE~ B. V~ ~ ~on ~ ~ ~t ~ is ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~7, (~ ~T~ O~~ · ~ ~ani~s ~ ~ ~~e ~ m~~ ~ ~ by ~ 2~7 ~ C. ~sm ~~ ~' ~-' .I '~ ~ PaW Ty~ Name.~ ~m~ ~ ~suer N~ ~ Pe~. Sm~ UST F~d S~e UST Cl~up F~ N/A f~ UST $~5,~ ~ S~ UST Y~ y~ P.O. Box 9~212 CI~ F~ o~ce ~d CI~ S~m, CA 942~2120 ~unl a~m ~n~= ~i~ F~c~ 'V~ ~ ~~ N/A ~ ~ $5,~0,0~ ~ ~1 Y~ Y~ O~ ~r P.O. Box ~ ~,~i~ ~ ~ Sm ~o, Tx 78292 A~ N~: if ~u a~ u~Q ~ S~ Fund ~ ~y ~ ~ ~r ~~ ~ fi~ m~l~. ~ ~ and submis~ of ~ ~hcd F~ Na~ F~ ~ ~ ~T~~O~ ~ N~~T~=O~ ~~~ /-~- O~ 1~ G~m - ChicfF~ 0~= i ~~ Nota~ Public St,~ ~ T.~ ~ ~~ My Commission E~l~ ~ ** TOTAL~ PAGE. T:\CONSTRUC\O&EADMIN\REPORT-1\01CACTNY.RPT ' ' 1 Valero Energy Corporation Fiscal Year 2000 Financial Assurance - Retail UST 1/22/2002 STORE # STATUS ZONE ADDRESS C~ITY STATE COUNTY CAPACITY PRODUCT FACILITY ID # 3074 O 352 3225 BUCK OWENS BLVD BAKERSFIELD CA KERN 20068 D 00719 10140 P 00719 14130 U 00719 ENERGY CORPORATION Post Office Box 696000 · San Antonio, Texas 78269-6000 February 5, 2002 City of Bakersfield Office of Emergency Services 1715 Chester Avenue, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Deaf Sirs: Re'c~n-~l~,-fi~al ~'e~-2~00-0-'fin-a~iai'~-~hra~ce-d~fi~eKf~ for Valero EnergY-C0qJ0ratibff-{6n 15~l/alf 6f'ail'- - its SUbsidiaries operating retail underground storage tank (UST) facilities} were forwarded to you. Valero Energy Corporation resubmitted these due to the purchase of Ultramar Diamond Shamrock. Many of you have inquired about the recent transaction between Valero Energy Corporation (Valero) and Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation (UDS). On December 3 l, 2001, UDS ' merged into Valero and became one entity. As you are already aware, the retail facilities, including the USTs, are not owned by our parent company, Valero, but instead these assets are owned by specific subsidiaries of the parent company. All of the subsidiaries that were in place prior to ' December 31, 2001; are still active and legal entities under Valero. Sho'uld y6Q.'h~v~"ahy;~t~§tion..s, please contact me at the address given below: John Willrodt, Director- Retail Compliance Valero Energy Corporation 6000 N. Loop 1604 W P. O. Box 696000 San Antonio, TX 78269-6000 Telephone:. 210-592,4235 Fax: 210-592,2314 Email: j ohn.willrodt@valero.com Very truly yours, ~~l~nOpd~i, anD~ ;e c. t o r ", JW/nak ' '¢c: Eliot Bow~,t~.,q~egal Dept;': - .-:":., ,'.-:.z- ~=,.:. :..~,. · .-x _,,:.. ~= ,:.~ , ,~...... ".' .:;.':' '.'['v,': "~" '.,,~, .,.:: :- . .r- ,:..,,....2 ~ ',: 5~...' -~ ~;~"~ ..='. ~:: ?. ,~ ' :,. ':, :.,'..~ 5 ,, :,.,,,-..~.:~, ,;,:,;:.- .~.:,!:,,~.:; : --,. ...... :. ,.. ~.,:...,i--.r;~ ........ ~,..-.¢~ .;.~,,. ;.,.; :::?.~,~.,_....-.. ~,....-:::.. ,.. , - ...,.!.:;,.,?. .... . ., .. ;.,.. -, .',.,,~.::- :..~. :'.' ..,:_£ ':".:-: . :- .-...:' :'y,.:,??,: .:,.,..~,~' .'...:i.....v',.?~...~ : V8159.p65 January 24; 2002 City of Bakersfield Office of Emergency Services 1715 Chester Avenue, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Sirs: Enclosed are financial assurance documents for Valero Energy Corporation for the fiscal year 2000. These are being resubmitted due to the purchase of Ultramar Diamond Shamrock by Valero Energy Corporation. Please forward to the appropriate personnel within your agency. Should you have any questions, please contact me at the address given below: John Wiilrodt, Director ~- Retail compliance Valero Energy Corporation 6000 N. Loop 1604 W P. O. Box 696000 San AntoniO, TX 78269-6000 Telephone: 2i0-592-4235 Fax: 210-592-2314 Email: j ohn.willrodt~valero.com Very truly yours, ~lrodt, Director Retail Compl(ance. JW/nak Enclosures V8159.p65 ~,U~i~O John O. Gibbons ENERGY CORPORATION Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer January 24,2002 State of California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs P. O. Box 944212 Sacramento, California 94244-2120 Dear Madam or Sir: RE: 'UST Financial Assurance I am the Chief Financial Officer of Valero Energy Corporation (Valero) located at One Valero Place, San Antonio, Texas 78212-3186. This letter is presented to support the use of the financial test of self-insurance to demonstrate Valero's financial responsibility for taking corrective action and/or compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden accidental releases and/or non-sudden accidental releases in the amount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate arising from operating Valero's underground storage tanks. The underground storage tanks listed on the attached addendum are covered by this financial test or a financial test under an authorized State program applicable to Valero. A financial test is used by Valero to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in the following amounts under other EPA regulations or state programs authorized by EPA under 40 CFR parts 271 and 145: ~ EPA Regulation: Closure (264.143 and 265.143) ...................... $ 7,828,550 Post-Closure Care (264.145 and 265.145) ..... $12,767,266 Liability Coverage (264.147 and 265.147) ...... $10,700,000 Corrective Action (264.101 (b)) ........................ $ 2,739,942 Plugging and Abandonment (144.63) ............. $ 770,505 Authorized State Programs: Closure .......................................................... $ N/A Post-Closure Care ......................................... $ N/A Liability Coverage .......................................... $ N/A Corrective Action ........................................... $ N/A Plugging and Abandonment .......................... $ N/A Total ................................................ $ N/A Valero has not received an adverse opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a "going concern" qualification from Arthur Andersen LLP, its independent audit firm, on its financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. Post Office Box 500 · San Antonio, Texas 78292-0500 · Telephone (210) 370-2693 · Facsimile (210) 370-2497 or 2234 State of California Page 2 of 3 January 24, 2002 ALTERNATIVE II 1. Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage being assured by a financial test, and/or guarantor ............................................................................. $2,000,000 2. Sum of current cost estimates for closure, post closure, corrective action, and liability coverage (total of (1)-(3) directly above) ............................. $34,806,263 3. Sum of lines 1 and 2 ........................................................................................... $36,806,263 4. Total tangible assets .......................................................... ~ .................... i ..... $4,227,446,000 5. Total liabilities (if any of the amounts reported on line 3 is included in total liabilities, you may deduct that amount from this line and add that amount to line 6) ......................................................... $2,780,649,000 6. Tangible net worth (subtract line 5 from line 4) ............................................. $1,446,797,000 7. Total assets in the U.S. (required only if less than 90 percent of Assets are located in the U.S ................................................................. N/A 8. Is line 6 at least $10 million? ............................................................................... Yes 9. Is line 6 at least 6 times line 3? ........................................................................... Yes 10. Are at least 90 percent of assets located in the U.S.? ........................................ Yes 11. Is line 7 at least 6 times line 3? ........................... .~T. ............................................ Yes 12. Current assets ............................................................................................... $1,285,067,000 13. Current liabilities ............................................................................................ $1,038,992,000 14. Net working capital (subtract line 13 from 12) .................................................. $246,075,000 ~5. Is line 14 at least 6 times line 3? ......................................................................... Yes 16. Current bond rating of most recent bond issue ................................................... BBB 17. Name of rating service ................................................................................. Standard & Poor 18. Date of maturity of bond ................................................ 12-1-2031, 04-01-2032, 12-15-2032 19. Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with The SEC, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Electrification Administration? ............................................................................. Yes State of California Page 3 of 3 January 24, 2002 I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.95 (d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown below. J.t0.~hny Gibbons W~ess/Notary v . Chief Financial Officer 01/24/02 01/24/02 Date Date 2001finassAR ~074 8225 BUCK OWENS BAKERSFIELD,CA 9J30@ 664 J24-9481 NO,V 18. 2001 1:48 PM STATUS REPORT ':ALL FUNCTIONS NORMAL INVENTORY REPORT T i:DIESEL 2 VOLUME = 8940 GALS ULLAGE = 11060 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 9067 GALS TC VOLUME = BBTO GALS HEIGHT = 58.51 INCHES WATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0.00 INCHES TEMP = 77.3 DEG F T S:UNLEADED REG VOLUME = 11259 GALS ULLAGE = 2871 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 1458 GALS TO VOLUME = 11145 GALS HE~_~HT = 70.79 INCHES WI, VOL = 0 GALS W~ = 0.00 INCHES TEMPi = 74.4 DEG F T 4:UNLEADED PLUS VOLUME = 46i2 GALS ULLAGE = 5527 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 4518 GALS TC VOLUME = 4567 GALS HEIGHT = 44.$1 INCHES WATER VOL = . 0 GALS WATER = 0.00 INCHES TEMP = 74.0 DEG F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ END ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME ~Cat. oex Tb-{t. '-qltolO INSPECTION DATE !I[t3[o I ADDRESS 3O~.g' t3tM,, au~0,.~, /~l~d' PHONE NO. 39~1-- q'q~:.t FACILITY CONTACT BUSINESS ID NO. 15-?-10- INSPECTION TIME NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ~ ~ Section 1: Business Plan and Inventory Program [~l Routine 't~ Combined [~ Joint Agency 1~ Mu!ti-Agency . ~ Complaint [~ Re-inspection OPERATION C V COMMENTS Appropriate permit on hand ' Business plan contact information accurate Visible address , Correct occupancy Verification of inventory materials / Verification of quantities Verification of location I L,,, /' Proper segregation of material {./- Verification of MSDS availability Verification of Haz Mat training Verification of abatement supplies and procedures Emergency procedures adequate L.~/ ' Containers properly labeled ~,' Housekeeping Fire Protection Site Diagram Adequate & On Hand C=Compliance V=Violation. Any hazardous waste on site?: [~] Yes ~-No Explain: Questions regarding this inspection? Please call us at (661) 326-3979 Business Site/Responsible Party White -'Env. Svcs. Yellow - Station Copy Pink - Business Copy Inspector: _~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE.OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 It FACILITY NAME ,~ea,,mtx 'T'tO& g'{'ol/3 INSPECTION DATE Section 2: Underground Storage Tanks Program [] Routine '~ Combined [] Joint Agency [21 Multi-Agency _ [] Complaint 121 Re-inspection Type of Tank 0tOIZCq Number of Tanks Type of Monitoring d/.aA Type of Piping &OIc OPERATION C V COMMENTS Proper rank data on file /' Proper owner/operator data on file Permit tees current (/, / Certification of Financial Responsibility / Monitoring record adequate and current Maintenance records adequate and current {~,/ Failure to correct prior UST violations Has there been an unauthorized release? Yes No Section 3: Aboveground Storage Tanks Program TANK SIZE(S). AGGREGATE CAPACITY Type of Tank Number of Tanks OPERATION Y N COMMENTS SPCC available SPCC on file with OES Adequate secondary protection Proper tank placarding/labeling Is tank used to dispense MVF? If yes, Does tank have overfill/overspill protection? C=Compliance /~,V=Violation Y=Yes N=NO Inspector: v Office of Environmental Services (805) 326-3979 us' ess Site Responsible Party White- Env. Svcs. Pink - Business Copy Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste Unified Permit ...,~ .CONDITIONS~ ,~ REVERSE SIDE :.-~:'.~.'. =. ',~ ,. : This _oermitis Issued for the followinq: ,, ' D Un~mu~ Storage ~ H~Ous ~s Permit ID ~::- 015~00~00690 BEACON TRUCK' STOP ~a H~ous Wa~ O~Si~ m~ ~LOCATION: 3225BUCK O~NS BLVD OFFICE OF ~N~R ONMENTAL SER ~CES' 1715 Chester Ave., .3rd Floor AppmvMby: . City of Bakersfield Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave., Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 326-3979 An upgrade compliance certificate has been issued in connection with the operating permit for the facility indicat6d below. The certificate number on this facsimile matches the. number on the certificate displayed at the facility. Instructions to the issuing agency: Use the space below to enter the tbllowing information in the tbnnat of your choice: name of owner: name of operator; nam6 of facility: street address, city, and zip code of tb. cility; thcility identification number (from Form A); name of issuing agency; and date of issue. Other identifying intbrmation may be added as deemed necessary by the local agency. This permit is issued on this 2nd day of November, 1998 to: BEACON TRUCK STOP Permit #015-021-000690 3225 Buck Owens Bivd Bakersfield, California 93308