Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK #3-C-06/12/95- '~- ENV. HEALTH -HMMP-INVESTIGATION RECORD ~A~ HOU~ OOD~ ACTIVIT~ I IMIT/W.O. ~: i~'/)'0 ~'~ £NV. HF_~LTH -HMMP INVESTlC~IION ~ ~,~ ~HO~ ~D~ A~VI~ . ~ t,/oz 0.9 ~ir~ ~ ~'~,~ ~ r,~~ ', ~~ ~ ' ' . . · ~ I -I - , J ~~~~~. - ~'" I~ , n, -' -':-.'. ' ,-' 4', ~_~ , -.~ ., '~'. u-,...'./~.:.-- /' '. ", t I ~" {MIT/W.O. if ~r,Q £ ENV. HEALTH -HMMP INVESTiC-W~iON RE¢_~RD PERMITNV.O. Number:. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPT, INVESTIGATION RECORD 115T 395-~005 /Ft. 3'~6J · Loading Dock ~.,'-~ , · I _ I General Direction Of ~~Mesh Position ~1 . I " I ~~ ~ . I Bakers Welding Supply ]:~ ' " Bakersfield, CA An ~nvironmental Servioes Compan~ 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300 Health Bakersfield, CA 93301 Services (805)861-3636 (805)861-3429 FAX Department June 12, 1995 REMED/AL ACTION COMPLETION CERT/FICATION I. Joseph Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Former Baker's Welding Supply (Union Carbide) Site No.: 050033 Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tank(s) at the above site. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to the underground tank release is required based on the available information as set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Article 11, Section 2721(e) (Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Regulations). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Gough at (805) 861-3636. Steve McCalley, Director ~/ ~-~-'--' Environmental Health Services ??artmem SMc:ch cc: W. J. Callahan col6050033.a Safety & £nvironmental Services San Ramon, Ca/if. 94583 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program '-.. Environmental Health Services Department 2700 "M' Street Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: CLOSURE REQUEST UNDERGROUND TANK REMEDIATION SITE -. PRAXAIR (BAKER'S WELDING 3505 PIERCE RD. BAKERSFIELD, CA (PERMIT NO.050033) Dear Ms. Gough: The purpose of this report is to request final closure for the above mentioned site, which was properly closed on May 9, 1995, in your presence. Enclosed you will ~nformation relating to this project up and to the time of closure. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me at (510) 866-6810. Praxair appreciates your support and efforts in bringing this project to a successful conclusion. Respectfully yours. PRAXAIR, INC. i. Joseph Lopez, R.E.A. Western Area Projects Manager CC: Mr. W.J. Callahan - Altair San Ramon Mr. N. A. DiFranco - Praxair, Keasby, NJ. REPORT CONTENTS SECTION 1. FINAL FIRST QUARTER REPORT 1995 AS PROVIDED BY OUR CONSULTANT ROUX ASSOCIATES WHICH CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: - HISTORICAL INFORMATION -GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS -SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER SAMPLE ANALYSES -SITE MAPS -GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA ALSO INCLUDED ARE THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: SECTION 2. CLOSURE REPORT AND ASSOCIATED PHOTOS FROM ADVANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC. DATED MAY 26, 1995 SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING WELL'S) CLOSURE PERMIT. DATED MAY 8, 1995 SECTION 4. CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS LETTER FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICE DEPARTMENT. DATED JANUARY 24, 1995 SECTION 5. CONFIRMATION OF CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FROM OUR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT ROUX, DATED FEBRUARY 7, 1995 SECTION 6. CONFIRMATION BORING LOG RECORD, DATED MARCH 15, 1995 SECTION 7. GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM CONFIRMATION SAMPLES TAKEN MARCH 15, 1995 SECTION 8. SOIL BORING ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM CONFIRMATION BORING DATED MARCH 15, 1995 SECTION 9. LETTER TO SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT CLOSING OUR AIR PERMIT, DATED MARCH 28, 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 April 6, 1995 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 FIRST QUARTER 1995 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly groundwater sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on March 15, 1995, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately l/2-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported frorfi a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. The assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample groundwater monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Laboratory analysis of samples collected from these wells indicated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000 /ag/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in groundwater. Groundwater levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the groundwater table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Groundwater samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly groundwater sampling at the Site in June 1993. The groundwater table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appeared to have been paved over. Groundwater samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. PX29~O1W.3.20 Mr. Jo,: Lopcz Page 2 of:3 April 6, 1995 .. The groundwater table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly groundwater sampling-events. Groundwater' samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BrEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the groundwater sample collected from MW-3. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87/~g/L, toluene at 1.5 ~g/L, and xylenes at 12 ~g/L. Based on the quarterly monitoring results from June 1993 to March 1994 the number of wells sampled each quarter was reduced from six wells to three wells (wells MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5). At the request of Dolores Gough of Kern County Environmental Health Services Department, wells MW-3, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 were sampled for this sampling event. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Four monitoring wells at the Site were ~mpled on March 15, 1995.' Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured (Table 1). Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Water samples were collected in a clean bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to groundwater was measured on March 15, 1995, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The groundwater elevations measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 29.08 ft. to 29.96 ft. below ground surface Cogs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has risen approximately 2.25 ft. since December 21, 1994. Groundwater elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-I, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-5 indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the Site was to the west. The gradient varied between 0.011 and 0.006 (Figure 3). The groundwater elevations in monitoring wells MW-4, MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient. The groundwater elevation in well MW-4 was not used because the reading was anomalously high. The groundwater elevations in wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used because these two wells are not screened across the water table. LABORATORY RESULTS Groundwater samples were analyzed by Zalco Laboratories, Inc., (Zalco) of Bakersfield, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for groundwater samples collected at the Site in March 1995 is presented in Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. PX29901W.3.20 Mr. Jot Lopcz ])ago 3 of 3 April 6, [995 - Laboratory analyses of the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. No additional groundwater monitoring events are scheduled at this Site. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction commenced on December 9, 1993. On June 3, 1994, the vapor extraction system (VES) was shut down because the effluent vapor concentration from the first carbon filter had detectable levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The first carbon filter was replaced and the system was restarted on August 4, 1994. Zalco conducted weekly field monitoring activities. Field monitoring activities included draining condensate from the system and measuring VOC concentrations of the extracted and treated vadose-zone vapors. Extracted vapor concentrations were not measured during this quarter but are estimated to be about 20 ppmv. On March 28, 1995, the carbon filters were removed by Wheelabrator Westates. A request to terminate the air permit was issued to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (attached). The total estimated quantity of TPH-G removed by the remediation system during this quarter is estimated to be approximately 50 lbs. Total TPH-G removed to date is approximately 500 lbs. These mass removal quantities are based upon estimated VOC concentrations, vapor flow rates and hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957 lbs), the carbon loading on March 28, 1994, was approximately 13% by weight. Respectfully ~ubmitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Rick Riedl, P.E. No. CO49631 Project Manager Attachments: Table 1 Groundwater Elevations Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Sample Analyses Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Groundwater, March 15, 1995 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Groundwater, March 15, 1995 Letter to SJVUAPCD Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Field Data Sheets PX29901W.3.20 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (1) Water (fl) Elevation (1) MW-I 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 12/2/93 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1/94 100.00 26.70 73.30 6/3/94 100.00 27.13 72.87 9/7/94 100.00 27.86 72.14 12/2 !/94 100.00 31.42 68.58 3/15/95 I00.00 29.08 70.92 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.~.6 63.23 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 6/3/94 100.07 27.17 72.90 9/7/94 100.07 27.91 72.16 12/21/94 100.07 31.42 68.65 3/15/95 100.07 29.08 70.99 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.1)5 63.01 12/2/93 100.39 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 100.39 27.60 72.79 6/3/94 100.39 27.85 72.54 9/7/94 100.39 28.54 71.85 12/21/94 100.39 32.00 68.39 3/15/95 100.39 29.96 70.43 MW-4 ~i 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 100.39 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 100.39 27.25 73.14 6/3/94 100.39 27.52 72.87 9/7/94 100.39 28.30 72.09 12/21/94 100.39 31.83 68.56 3/15/95 100.39 29.33 71.06 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 100.54 27.59 72.95 6/3/94 100.54 27.92 72.62 9/7/94 100.54 28.66 71.88 12/21/94 100.54 32.17 68.37 3115195 100.54 29.92 70.62 MW-6 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.36 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 100.51 28.05 72.46 6/3/94 100.51 28.31 72.20 9/7/94 100.51 28.97 71.54 12/21/94 100.51 32.17 68.34 3/15/95 100.51 29.96 70.55 MW-8 6/4/93 Unkno~r~ 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 100.33 30.37 69.96 3/1/94 100.33 27.90 72.43 6/3/94 100.33 28.16 72.17 9/7/94 100.33 28.84 71.49 12/21/94 100.33 32.17 68.16 3/15/95 100.33 29.92 70.41 FOOTNOTES (I) = Elevatmns measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May t 990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. Page 1 of 1 PX2990tW.$.21 Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date Designation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MW-I ~ 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected cb 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND '~ 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND t~ 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 Well damaged - bio sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ND 1.5 ND 12 12/2/93 80 ND 0.60 ND 13 3/1/94 82 ND ND ND 1.7 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 12/21194 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-4 6 6/4/93 Well dry - bio sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND 1VfiN-5 ~ 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/1'4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND lxrD ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND N~D ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND -12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 Well missing - No sample collected ~lW-7 ,,~ 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND a 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND $ 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND *, 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND ~' 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TPH-G =Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/8015) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected Page 1 of 1 PX29901W. 3.22 SITE LOCATION' .,~--,, I SOURCE: TR~°LE A ~ OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA : O' 2,000' :OOUPILED BY: P.S. PREPARF..O FOR: PRAXAIR PR[PARD3 BY: R.P. OaTE: 06/9.1 SCALE: AS SHOWN, SITE LOCATION PROJ£¢! NO. 29901W FILE NAU£: PAI'OPO-I BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK I I o t J EXPLANATION: ~ ,. ~W-I MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION I ' MISSING . STORAGE · I TANK * O' 20' 40' J ' ~ · CO,PILEg BY: P.S. PREPARED FO~: PRAXAIR PREPARED BY: R.P. FI~R[ PROJECT ~NGR. P.S. f~ILE: ROUX ASSOCIATBS DATE: 01/g3. SITE P~N ~A c~ SCALE: AS SHOWN · ~r~r PROJECT N0. 29901W 7iL[ NAVE: PAFmC01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 70.43 ~- I ,I PIERCE .w-8 ~ I ROAD i MISSING m ~ 70.9 ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION I 72.~4 GROUND WATER EL~ATIONS ABOVE MEAN SEA L~EL I $ v LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER EL~ATION I ~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) STORAGE I O' 20' 40' TANK I I L ~ ~ i Compiled bF R.R. PFepoFed For: Prepored b~ G.w. PRAXAIR FIOURE  Project Mgr: R.R. Title: Date: 4-6-95 ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER, MARCH 15, 1995 Environmentol Consultin~ ~ Mono¢ement Revision: 0 Project No. 2990~W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 29901004 ' j ~ k~AIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK ~ Mw-3 j '~ND/ND j ~--~ND/ND ~UW-4 I I I ~ ~ I i I GASOLINE I TANK J I I HIGHWAY g9 J I I I J PIERCE ~w-8 J ~NO/N~ j ROAD J ~ ~w-s TN D/N D J I EXPLANATION: I J ~, U,SS,NaUW-6 ~UW-1 ~W-1 ~ONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION J I ../.~ CONCENTRATIONS OF TPH-G/BENZENE ND NOT DETECTED. FOR DETECTION LIBITS J I ' SEE A~ACHED ~BO~TORY REPORTS I ' ' LPG O' 20' 40' J STORAGE ~'"~ ~ I APPROXIMATE SCALE I ....., , Compiled b~ R.R. Prepored For: ' ' ' Prepared b~ G.W. PRAXAIR ~ Projec~ ~gr: R.R. TiUe: Da~e: 4-~-g5 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEU~ HYDROCARBONS AS GASOLINE (TPH-G) ~ BENZENE ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN ~ARCH ~ 5. lgg4 ~nvir~ment~ Consulling Revision: 0 · Monogement Project No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 5505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALI~OENIA File No: 2990100~ GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI,ELD DATA SHEET PROJECTNO; , ~"~q0!. ~ ...... WELLIO: '~'[ CASING DIAMETER (inches): _~/ 3 4 6 B i 2 Other GALl. ON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.1~7 .0.38_~ 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other .... .. ...'7 - -/ 1( ccu,o, c~,~ · c.~cu_,~o I ACI'U'A'L ~ i -DTW~ X u.s~-"r ..... X vo~u~. " ~ur~. I___PUR_GE_..j-'~:7~_ ..... DATE PURGED: ./~Y' START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ,.~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ., E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gaL} (units) (~mhos/cm @ 25' C) ('~ (visual) (visu~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP~1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump ....... Bailer (Teflon®) ._ 2' Bladder Pump -.-----. Bailer (TeflonO) ..... Centrffug~ Pump ~ .__ _ 8~iler (PVC) DOL Sampler B~ler (~ SIlO ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (~n~ ~ Dipper Subme~ible Pump Oedi~ted Bailer Oisposable ~ D~i~t~ REM~KS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI.ELD DATA SHEET CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3~ 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/UNI:AR FOOT: 0. l_.__Z_.,7 0.3.__..._..~.8, 0,66 1.S 2.6 5,8 Other ' ¢.~4,kOH CA~IN~3 * TO ' { DTW' X u,*~,~'~. _. X vo~ = ~a IBURGE'~'''' DATE PURGED: .,~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ START (2400 Hr) ENO'(2400 Hr) TIME vOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (~u'nhos/cta ~ 25~ C) (°F) (visual) (visu~') FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e. F8-1, XDUP-I}; " PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2* Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon(D) ' 2" Bladder Pump ..-..-..-..-, Bailer (Teflon~') C. enttff'ug~ Pump :. .... Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler Bailer (~ Steel} ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (S't~nlessSl, ee0 ~ Dipper ~ Submemible Pump Dedicated Bailer Oisposa,~le ~ Dedicmed REMARKS: ,, , GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET' CASING DI~ER ~n~es): ~ ~ 4 6 8 12 Olher ~LLON~N~ FOOT: _~.~ , 0,38_: 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Diner TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C. TEMPE~TURE coLOR ~RBIDI~ (24~ H~) (g~.) (units) (~ho~ ~ 25' C) ("~ (visu~l) FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT __ 2" Bladder Pump X_ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~ 8&iler (Teflon¢') . _ Centrffug~ Pump ...... Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler B~dler (St,Cniess Steel) ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (St~nles:s ~ee0 Dipper __ Submer~ible Pump Oedic.~led B.~iler Oisposable ~ Dedicated OIher. : Other. REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET CASING.DIAMETER (inches}: 2 3~ 4 6 8 12 Other GALLO tN/LIN,,EAR FOOT: _ 0,17 0,38 0,66 1,5 2.6 5,8 Other .... ' '" / ' (/ --'" " I AC~'UA'L~ i ! DATE PURGED: .,~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: _ _.~. START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 ~Hr) (g~l.) (units) (~mhos/cm @ 2S' C) ('~ (visual) (visu~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP-1); -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ~ 2' 8ladder Pump _ _ _ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' 8{adder Pump -.---- Bailer (Teflon~') ..... Centrl~ucjaJ Pump ..... Bailer (PVC) D0L Sampler Bailer (St.3Jr~ Steel} ...---.- Submers~le Pump ~ Bailer (S't~ntess Stee0 __ Dipper Submersible Pump Oedic~ted __ Ba. iIe¢ Oisposable ~ , Dedicated REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET ,/ CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ ,.!, 4 6 8 '12 Olher C.~L[.ON/1..INEAFI FOOT: 0.1.___~7 0.88_. 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other .... IAc'ruX'L TO ~'~,~¢-'/'-. DTW ~'ll"x ,.,.,,~'"u'°"~-< , / 7... X ~,,o,,.~,~ ,.~ =' c,..c....~o,,....,~, ~,,~.:~ O ! PUR_~E_~_-._._~_. DATE PURGED: ~ START (2400 Hr) /_~'k!"~' F:ND (2400 Hr) ].G.'~5 DATE SAMPLED: .~ -15'--9..~'"' START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,O, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (t400 I~') (gal.) (uni(s) (pmhos/cm ~ 25' C) ('F") (v{Suzl) (visu~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) .. ~" Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (T'eflone) h ..... Cen~'l~gaJ Pump ...... Bailer (PVC) COL Sampler __ B~ler (St,3Jr~:~ Steel) ~ Submecs~le Pump Bailer (StaJnles~ Stee0 Dipper , Subme~ible Pump ., Dedicated Ba3er Oispo.~ble ~ Dedicated Other. ; Ol. hec REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET · CASING DI~ER 0riches}: ~ ~ 4 6 8 12 Olher ~LCON~N~ FOOT: 0.1~ 0.88_~ 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 o~er DATE PURGED: END DATE SAMPLED: 5' I~"(?~ START (2400 Hr> END (2400 TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,O, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (pmhos/cm @ ~_'~' C) ('F) (v{-~ua0 (visu~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump _,~ Bailer (Teflon®) _ ._ 2" Bladder Pump .~ Ba~ler (Tel~on~') ..... CentrlDgaJ Pump ~ Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler B~ler (Stainless S(eel) .,---- Submers~le Pump Bailer (St~nle~ 5'teeO __ Dipper _ Submersible Pump ,, Dedicated Bailer Disposable ~ Oedic. ated Other:. : Other:. REMARKS: iv ENVIRONMEI T AL HEALTH SERVICF_. DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 - - DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 881-3429 FAX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMIT #:. DW 1375-05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (8 wells) 137605 MONITORING WELL(S) PERMI~F 1377-05 1378-05 1379-05 1380-05 1381-05 1382-05 OWNER'S NAME: PRAXAII~ INC. DATE: MAY 8, 1995 FACILITY NAME: FORMERLY BAKER'S WELDING FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA DRILLING METHOD: CONTRACTOR: SB & S DRILLING LICENSE NO.: C57 560175 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) GROUNDWATER NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: EIGHT GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 2. Well destruction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 3. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 4. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 5. The owner will be billed oversight cost for Department time associated with this destruction upon completion of work. All eight (8) monitoring wells will be sealed to grade level with cement grout, of acceptable consistency, with no more than 5 percent Bentonite, as confirmed by inspection. 6. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. THiS PERMIT MUST BE SIGNED BY EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR O~.~ ~'// ~--'~ ER~~R-'~' ...... ~ j/(~d N'I:RACTO .' ~NATU R E DATE PERMIT APPROVED BY: ~olov'l.~ ~0~ _ ~/ ~ Dolores Gough ' ~/' DATE: May 8, 1995 DG:ch gough\1375-O5.m97 ENVlRONMEN' L HEALTH SERVICES EPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX · ~ '.; "; '.:: January 24, 1995 Joseph Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 C~ino ~on San ~on, California 94583 SUB,CT: Under~ound Ta~ Site Remediafion, Pr~air (B~er's Weld~g) 3505 Pierce, B~ersfield, CA (Pe~it No. 050033) Dear Mr. Lopez: We have reviewed your le~er ~d ~e subject facili~ file to dete~e if site closure is appropriate at ~is time. Based on our review, it appe~s that ~e site may be ready for closure. However, remediafion of ~e vadose zone needs to be verified by adv~cing a minimum of one confi~ato~ boring at ~e foyer ~nk location. ~e resul~ must be submiRed to ~is office wi~in 30 days from the sampling date. Following verification that the site has been remediated to ac~p~ble levels, the following need to be conducted before a closure le~er can be issued. 1. All the wells ins~lled for ~is investigation must be properly abandoned. 2. All remaining wastes such as soil cuEings and purged water generated from site activities must be disposed or recycled in accord~ce wi~ applicable laws and regulations. 3. ~e vapor extraction system must be dismantled and ~y resulting wastes disposed or recycled in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. ~e above are our minimum requirements for closure, hence we believe a meeting at ~is phase of the project may not be of benefit to either pa~. We appreciate your cooperation reg~ding ~is maEer and if you have any questions or need fu~er de~ils on our requirements, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director By: Dolores Gough H~dous Mmerials Specialist II H~dous Materials M~agcmcnt Pro~ DG:cas ~goughk050033b.clt TELEPHONE CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: February 7:1995 TIME: _ RM~ ,. PROJECT: ,2990 IW I:ROM: Dolores Gough TO: ]),Jck ~_edl /~t(,. COMPANY: Kern County_ COMPANY: Roux Associates. Inc. TEL. NO: (805] 861.3(536 TEL. NO: (5.,10) 602-233) CLOSUm~ OF LUST $ITE. 3505 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD. CA Discussed closure requirements outlined in County's letter (draft) to ?raxair dated .l'anuary 24, 1995. Dolores Gough elaborated on closure requirements as follows: · One confirmatory boring located at removed tank site. - · Collect samples at $ foot intervals and water table,. · Analyze each sample for TPH-O and BTEX. · Clean-up levels or target levels for soil is approximately ten times MCLs, or as follows: · TPH-G = 1 ppm; benzene = 0.01 ppm; toluene = 0.4 ppm (reference is SNARL) · ethylbenzene = 0.3; and xylenes (total) = 0.2 ppm. · Closure Plan is not required. · Notification by phone to Kern County to allow oversight. · Results of soil boring presented in letter report. · Schedule boring at any time. Schedule prior to last quarterly groundwater sampling event is O.K. · Will discuss abandoning wells after reviewing report. RouxAssociates, Inc. 1855 Gatenay Blvd., Suite 770 Concord, California 94520 510. 602.2333 Fac. 510. 68Z 1258 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: April 28, 1995 To: Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. Fax: (510) 866-6912 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersf~ld, California Sender: Rick RiedI YOU SflOULD RECEIVE 2 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL TIlE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 510.602.2555. For your files, boring log for UST closure. Hard copy to follow. RPR ~B '95 0~:B6 FR BBS 8~t l??~ TO ~71~ ~ PID ~u~ ~ U.~.C.B. ~ L~O~IC DE~R~ON D~ DE~ ~) ~WC~; ~ ~ ~ 15 12~ ~ S[~~~~.~-~,~,~ll AEc =V* ~R~T~ ~NC~ ~ ' ~.o.~~ ~~~ .... WE.. BORI,N~ LOG PR~-~, , L~A~N ' '~ ~ R~ ~. ~a .... ~ , ~ T~RL ~.~ RouxAssociates, Inc. 1855 Gate~afl Blvd., Suite 77'0 Concord, California 9,t520 510.602.2333 Far: 51 O. 687.1258 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: March 22, 1995 joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. Fax: (510) $66-6912 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, Calfornia Sender: Rick Riedl YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 2 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SH~2: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL SI O. 602, 23.93. Groundwater analytical results for your use. J:~--(_(_--~;) J~l'-I.,/ I ! ,;.)1 I~.VUA FJ~,,,3VVII'llr~O II'IV, 1't'11~. llv, VJ. VVVLrV.d,J Analyl:;~cal. & Oonsul~lncj ~em/lces 43o~ Armour Avenue (COS) l~okersfisld, C~,,!fornla ~808 FAX (~JO~) ROUX Associates, Znc. Laborato~' No: 43260 185S Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 gate Rece ved~ 3.15-95 Concord, Ca 945g0 gate Repo, ted: 3-2Z-95 Attention: Rick Rtedl Sample: Water Sample gescrfptlon: 43[60-! Monitoring Well J3 ' 43180-2 Monitoring Well #5 4~1~0-3 Monitoring Well 45160-4 Monitoring Well Sampled by Londo Wllktns of -1 -2 -3 -4 ~qtl. ~ ~/1 ~ )~J. Volatile Aromatic .Hydrocarbons ~enzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 Toluene < 0.5 ¢ 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0,$ Ethyl Benzene < 0.$ < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0,; 0.5 Xylenes < 0.5 ~ 0.5 < 0,5 < 0,$ 0,5 Nethod: EPA 8020 ' Date Analy:ed: 3-17-95 To:al Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < 500 < 500 c 500 : $00 $00 ~thad: OOH$ Luft ~anu~l Date Analyzed: 3-17-95 HRL= Hinimu~ Reporting Level Jim Et Lab Ions Hanage~ JE~lb RouxAssociates, Inc. 1855 Gate~ea.y Blvd., Suite 770 Concord, California 94520 510. 602.2S35 Fax: 510. 687, I258 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Date: April 5, 1995 To: /oe Zopez Praxair, Inc. Fax: (510) 866-6912 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Sender: Rick Riedl YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 2 PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEE'.I; IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE ,PAGES, PLEASE CALL 510.602.2333. Soil boring analytical results for yot, r use. Original to follow in the mail. RECEIVED NAR 3 I 1995 $ M CLaboratory, Inc. Anal.ical Chemistry Certificate #1049 Client Name: Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. Address : 4400 Ashe Road, ~206 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Attention : Jon Buck Date samples collected: 3-15-95 Date analysis completed: 3-16-95 Date samples received : 3-15-95 Date of report : 3-17-95 Project Name: Paxair RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~ 287 ID: CB1-5 ug/g DLR,~g/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 # 288 ID: CB1-10 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 289 ID: CBi-15 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Matrix Type : Soil Method of Analysis for BTEX : EPA 8020 Method of Analysis for TPH (Gasoline) : DHS GC-FID TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting ug/g : microgram per gram (ppm) ND : None Detected Stan Comer, M Sc. Analytical Chemist 211 Aviation Street * Shafter Airport · SI'after, CA 93263 (805) 393-3597 · FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS= Project Name= Paxair Project No. z R~SULTS OF ANALYSIS= ~ 290 ID: CB1-20 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasollne) ND 1.0 # 291 ID: CB1-25 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0=005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 292 ID: CB1-30 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Stan Comer, c. Analytical Chemist Matrix Spike Summary Sheet Method: 8020/8015M Code: 2 Sets 27 Date: 3-16-95 Samples analyzed: #286-292 Sample spiked: 9287 & ~288 Analyst: Comer Spike Data Chromatogram: ~2668, 2711 A~alysi.s True Accep.~ble Results Value Range TPH Gaeoline 15 15.0 13.0 - 19.0 Benzene 0.38 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Toluene 0.38 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Ethylbenzene 0.40 0.35 0.28 - 0.42 p-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 m-Xylene 0.39 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 o-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Isopropyl Benzene 0.42 0.36 0.29 - 0.43 Comments: ug/g = microgram per gram (ppm) 20 uL of B-9 and 10 uL of G-117 standards used to prepare the MS and MSD. 20 grams of sample were spiked. CHAIN-OF-CUS', .~DY RECORD '~ent p " D~te .... LAB Project # .... ~ ~dr~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ '" ~:~,~C~I~ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 18~ ~AY BOU~D SUI~ ~0 CON.RD, CALIF~NIA ~ 510 ~-2~ FAX~ March 28, 1995 Mr. Tom Gofs Permit Services Manager San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 2700 M Street, Suite 275 Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Permit No. S- 1426-1 - I Dear Mr. Gofs: This letter serves as a request to terminate the permit to operate number S-142 6-1-1 (attached). The basis for this request is the remediation project is complete and the vapor extraction system will be removed from the site. , If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the undersigned at (510) 602-2333. Sincerely, Rick Riedl Proiect Engineer enclosure cc: Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District PERMIT TO OPERATE PERMIT NO: sq4~q-~ EXPIRATION DATE: LEGAL OWNER OR OPERATOR: PRAX~R, ~NC. MAILING ADDRESS: 242.0 CAMINO P. AMON SAN RAMON, CA 94583 LOCATION: 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD EQUIPlVlENT DF_~CRIPTION: PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SOIl. REMEDIATION OPERATION INCLUDING 7.5 HP VACUUM PUMP, INLET WATER SEPARATOR, AND DUAL STAGE CARBON FILTERS (PRIMARY - 33.0 CU. FT. & SECONDARY - 12.8 CU. FT.). CONDITIONS 1. No air contaminant shall be released into the atmosphere which causes a public nuisance. 2. All lines, fittings, pump seals, and appurtenances shall be leak free, i.e. no detectable emissions. 3. Vapor extraction wells shall not vent to atmosphere. rbon canisters shall be in use whenever vacuum pump is operating. · 5. Vacuum pump shall discharge only to primary carbon canister followed by secondary canister. 6. When breakthrough (1.0 ppm by volume of VOC's) occurs at primary canister, operation shall be shutdown until primary camster is recharged with fresh carbon. 7. Influent flow rate to the primary carbon canister shall not exceed 250 scfm. 8. Volatile organic compound (VOC) emission concentration shall not exceed 1.0 ppmv. 9. Benzene emission concentration shall not exceed 1.8 ppbv. CONDITIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE This Permit to Operate remains valid through the permit expiration date listed above, subject to payment of annual permit fees and compliance with permit conditions and all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. This permit is valid only at the location specified above, and becomes void upon any transfer of ownership or location. Any modification of the equipment or operation, as def'med in District Rule 2201, will require a new permit. This permit shall be posted as prescribed in District Rule 2010. DAVID L. CROW Executive Director/APCO Southern Regional Office *2700 M Street, Suite 275 *Bakersfield, California 93301 *(805) 861-36o°2* FAX (805) 861-2060 CONDITIONS FOR S-1426-1-1 Page: 2 10: Collected liqu!ds shall be transferred to closed containers and disposed of in a manner which prevents emissions to the atmosphere, i.e. no detectable emissions. ... Sampling ports shall be provided prior to, between, and after the two carbon canisters. 12. After the first 26 days of operation, monthly field samples prior to, between, and after the canisters shall be taken with the PID for the remaining life of ~e prbject. 13. Grab samples shall be analyzed by an independent testing laboratory for total petroleum hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. 14. Permittee shall maintain accurate records of all monitoring, ~mpling, analytical, and operational data and shall make such records available for District inspection tor two years. ENVIRONME! HEALTH SERVICEII DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 'M" Street, 'Suite 300 DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 (80S) 861-3636 (80S) 861-3429 FAX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMIT #: *DW 137.~05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (8 wells) 137605 MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT 1377-05 1378-05 1379-05 1380-05, 1381-05 1382-05 OWNER'S NAME: PRAXAIR, INC. DATE: MAY 8, 1995 FACILITY NAME: FORMERLY BAKER'S WELDING FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA DRILLING METHOD: CONTRACTOR: SB & S DRILLING LICENSE NO.: C57 560175 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) GROUNDWATER NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: EIGHT (8) GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 2. Well destruction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 3. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 4. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 5. The owner will be billed oversight cost for Department time associated with this destruction upon completion of work. All eight (8) monitoring wells will be sealed to grade level with cement grout, of acceptable consistency, with no more than 5 percent Bentonite, as confirmed by inspection. 6. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. THIS PERMIT MUST BE SIGNED BY EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER._ PERMIT APPROVED "Y: '~O/0Y~,, ~l~r,~/,- . // Dolores Gough ' ~ DATE: May 8, 1995 DO:ch gough\1375-05an97 Case.Ciosur Summary Lealdng Underground Fuel Storage Tank.Prog ~ram O !. Agency Information !1. Case~lnformation FIB LUSTiS Ca~ No: IJ3cal Ca.~e No: 05'00~ ~. LOP Case No: URF filing date: SWEEPS No: Responsible Parties Addresses Phone Number Tank No Size in Gal. I Contents Closed in-Place/Removed? Date 2 3 Iil, Release and Site Characterization Information C~use a~d type of rel~: GA4t)/_ 1 Site chamete~n complete?' Y~ ' No I Date approved by oversight agency:. Moni~ringWea= In~med? ~ No'lNumben ~ I Pmper~ inm~? ~ .o Highest GW depth below ground surface:= ~O' '1 I-ow est depth:: ~-o' iF Iow direction:-- MostSensitiveCurmntUse: ' L.[ G,'-~ I,~ D~57"~l,4L / t..~/~,'W E ~ c/,4 /.. Are drinking 1~-ate, wells affected? Yes I~) ! Aquifer, name: Off-site benefa=iaJ use impacts (addmsses/Ioc~tions): Report(s)cnfile? ~S~ No IWhemismport(s)filed? ~-~1/. /~_~A~ )=/CE Treatment and Disposal of Affected Material !Material Amount (Include Units) i Action 0'real3-nent or Disposal w/Destination) ... Date :Piping Frae Product A.)OAJ ~' ~ Groundwater :- · Barrels ~xhib~: N Page ~ of 2 STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. mRECTOR C O U N T Y Environmental 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300 Health Bake~e~, CA 93301 Services (805)861-3636 Department (805)861-3429 FAX June 12, 1995 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION I. Joseph Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Former Baker's Welding Supply (Union Carbide) Site No.: 050033 Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter confu'ms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage tank(s) at the above site. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, no further action related to the underground tank release is required based on the available information as set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Article 11, Section 2721(e) (Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action Regulations). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Gough at (805) 861-3636. Steve McCalleY~ Environmental Health Services I~partment SMc:ch cc: W. J. Callahan col6050033.a UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) I CONTAMINATION SITEREPORT REPRESENTINa ~ ~NE~E~TOR ~ REG~ BOARD ~ ~PA~ OR ~E~ ~E CRO~ STRUT REG~N~ BOARD P~E (1) NAME QU~T~ LOST (~LLONS) ~ UNKNOWN ~ DATE DI~VERED ~ HOW DI~VER~ ~ iNV~TORY ~NTR~ ~ SU~URFACE MONiTORi~ ~ NUiS~CE ~NDmONS DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N M~OD USED TO STOP DI~R~ (CHECK ~ ~AT ~ '~ ~ Ol Y~ Y~ '~ UNK--N ~ REMOVE =N~N~ ~ CLOSE TANK & REMO~ ~ REPAIR PIPING ~ PIPING L~K ~ OTHER ~ mRRmlON ~ UNKN~N ~ O. ER CHECK ONE ONLY ~ UNDERMINED ~ SOIL ONLY ~ GROUNDWA~R ~ DRINKI~ WA~R - (CHECK ONLY IF WA~R ~L~ ~ AC~Y BEEN AFFEC~D) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ NOAC~ONTA~N ~ PR~IMINARYS~A~E~MENT~RK~NSUBM~ ~ POLLUTIONC~C~RI~ON ~ ~BEI~NFIRMED ~ PR~IMINARYSI~A~E~M~TUNDERWAY ~ P~TCLE~UPM~RI~INPROGRE~ ~ REMED~N P~N CASE CLOSED (~E~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ CLE~UP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVA~ & DISUSE (DO) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (F~ ~ EN~C~ B~ DEG~DATION (l~ ~ C~ SI~ (C~ ~ EXCAVATE & TREAT ~ ~ PUMP & TREAT G~UNDWA~R (O~ ~ RE.CE SUPPLY (R~ ~ VACUuM~NTAINMENTExT~cTBARRIER~ (CB) ~ OTHER ~ ACT~N(o~REQUIRED (NA) ~ TREA~E~ AT H~P (H~ FROM: SUBJECT FEE CODE: CUSTOMER P. O. # ./~/r~ ~ ~ 75~/ (log book #) · ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC- May 4, '1995 /E/~':i." - '. Ms. Dolores Gough ~,~--// Kern Coun~ Environmental Health Se~ices Depo~ent 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 9330~ Re: Abandon Monitoring Wells Altair Gases 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA Dear Ms. Gough: On May 9, '1995, Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. plans to abandon eight monitoring wells at the above referenced site. These wells will be abandoned in the following manner: Tremie neat cement grout to well bottom and seal well to grade level. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 83'1-'1646. Sincerely, Advanoed Environmental Concepts, Inc. Joseph A. Dunwoody Registered Geologist · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND · 4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313 8051831-1646 · FAX 805/831-1771 ., HE~ MONITOR!NG WELL APPLIC~[~CIN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT ,, ,, HAZARDOUS MATERL~ MANAGI:-MENT PROG~ Applica,ion Date :~-')/~-/'~"" 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 No. of We~ ~-~ BAKI=RSFIELD, CA 93301 Fro No. ~--~:~._~ MW No. fsl DLO 1~7~'-0~ Circle'One: pro 1~37f-0~ Ol, O D uJ 1%77---o5 CONSTRUCT MODIFY DESTROY For Office Use Only Dc~ A. FAClI_ITY INFORMATION Project Contact: Joe Dunwood¥ Phone: 831-1646 T/R/~em Name: Altair Gases Facility. Phone: Cro~ Sueeu Addr~: 3505 Pierce Road CI~.: Bakersfield Zip: 93308 Owner:. Praxair~ Inc. Phone: (510) 866-6800 Address: 2420 Camino Ramon Ci.ty: San Ramon Zip: 94583 B. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION £nvimnmcntal Contractor:. Advanced Environmental Concepts? Inc. Phone: 831-1646 Ad~: 4400 Ashe Road, #206 Cl .m~. Bakersfield Zip: 93313 License No. and .Typm N/C W.~ No.: W951104660 Drilling Contractor. S B'& S Drilling Phone: (209) 252-9460 Address: 7756 Floradora City:. Fresno Zip: 93727 License No. and .Type: C57 560175 W.C. No.: 1188796 "' C. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Lithology Log Reviewed By: Joe Dunwoody Registration No.: 5504 D. PROIECT INFORMATION I Proposed Start Dale: 5-9-95 Proposed Completion Date: 5-9-95 .. Drilling Method: Abandon 8 G WMW's . .TYPe of Well (Circle One): Groundwater Vadose Zone Test Hole Signatur"~_!~_ ~__,__ Title: Pro ~ect Mgr. Date: 5-4-95 ~,,.OILDALE KERN COUNTY -,-4'~- Lmg#y Rc - Location Map- FIGURE AEC 3505 Pierce Road 1 ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS P.O. BOX40672 BAKERSRELD, CA 93384 County of Kem· Bakersfield, California kl~ i MAIN BUll. DING LOAOING DOCK I~1 I0~1 ~ ~ I m '~-~1 EXPLANATION: ~ j I *Mi'I-1 UONITORI~8 WELL ~v~-S ~ VAULT BOX · C,I LPG STORAGE TANK O' 20' 40'. APPROXIMATE SCALE~ ~ COI~D 8~: 9.H. ~P~[O F~: PRAXAIR ~ RCU~ ~ ~ P~EP~D B'l: R.P. / Oa~: 01/9~ j R[MEOIATION SYST[}~ R0CA aSSOC~T~ . a~ m~ ~[: ~ SHC'a'~ I CONC[PTUAL ~YOUT · ~ P~JECT IIG 29901V~R j ~E m~E PA-~! J ALTAIR GAS[S ~ EOUIPM~T ~ raxalr, Inc. Caller Service 5117 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramom CA 94583 Tel (510) 866-6800 Fax (510) 866-6912 April 21, 1995 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Resource Management Agency Environmental Health Services Dept. 2700 "M" Street Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Ref: QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIF. Dear Ms. Gough: Enclosed you will find the First Quarter 1995 Groundwater Monitoring Report as prepared byour consultant ROUX ASSOCIATES. As you will note, and as I had previously communicated to you all wells sampled were NON-DETECTABLE. Also included in this package are the soil boring results that were taken on the same day that the monitoring well samples were taken. You will note that all soil samples taken from our confirmation boring were NON-DETECTABLE, as we had previously discussed. The last piece of information included in this package is a letter sent by ROUX ASSOCIATES to Mr. Tom Gofs from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, in which we requested that our air permit to operate the Vapor Extraction System be terminated since we are closing the site. As per our agreement, I am in the process of securing the services of Advance Environmental Concepts Inc., for the purpose of closing the Pierce Road site, as per your instructions in your letter dated January 24, 1995. Mr. Joseph A. Dunwoody from AEC will be coordinating the efforts to close the site and will be contacting your office prior to abandonment of the wells so you can be present, if you wish. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (510) 866-6810. Respectfully yours, PRAXAIR INC. I o Joseph Lopez Project Manager cc: Mr. John Noonan C.R.W.Q.C.B. Mr. N.A. DiFranco- Praxair Keasby. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 April 6, 1995 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 FIRST QUARTER 1995 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly groundwater sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on March 15, 1995, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, Calitbrnia (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Ofin Way. The Site is approximately ½-rnile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. The assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample groundwater monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Laboratory analysis of samples collected t¥om these wells indicated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000 gg/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in groundwater. Groundwater levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the groundwater table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Groundwater samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly groundwater sampling at the Site in June 1993. The groundwater table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appeared to have been paved over. Groundwater samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. PX29901W.3.20 Mr. Joe Lopcz Page 2 of 3 April 0. 1995 The groundwater table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly groundwater sampling events. Groundwater samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the groundwater sample collected from MW-3. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87 #g/L, toluene at 1.5 txg/L, and xylenes at 12 ~g/L. Based on the quarterly monitoring results from June 1993 to March 1994 the number of wells sampled each quarter was reduced from six wells to three wells (wells MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5). At the request of Dolores Gough of Kern County Environmental Health Services Department, wells MW-3, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 were sampled for this sampling event. ..~ SAMPLING PROCEDURES Four monitoring wells at the Site were sampled on March 15, 1995. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured (Table 1). Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Water samples were collected in a clean bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to groundwater was measured on March 15, 1995, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The groundwater elevations measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 29.08 ft. to 29.96 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has risen approximately 2.25 ft. since December 21, 1994. Groundwater elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-l, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-5 indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the Site was to the west. The gradient varied between 0.011 and 0.006 (Figure 3). The groundwater elevations in monitoring wells MW-4, MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient. The groundwater elevation in well MW-4 was not used because the reading was anomalously high. The groundwater elevations in wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used because these two wells are not screened across the water table. LABORATORY RESULTS Groundwater Samples were analyzed by Zalco Laboratories, Inc., (Zalco) of Bakersfield, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for groundwater samples collected at the Site in March 1995 is presented in Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. PX2990 lW.3.20 Mr. Joe Lopcz P~ge 3 of 3 April 6. 1995 Laboratory analyses of the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. No additional groundwater monitoring events are scheduled at this Site. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction commenced on December 9, 1993. On June 3, 1994, the vapor extraction system (VES) was shut down because the effluent vapor concentration from the first carbon filter had detectable levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The first carbon filter was replaced and the system was restarted on August 4, 1994. Zalco conducted weekly field monitoring activities. Field monitoring activities included draining condensate from the system and measuring VOC concentrations of the extracted and treated vadose-zone vapors. Extracted vapor concentrations were not measured during this quarter but are estimated to be about 20 ppmv. On March 28, 1995, the carbon filters were removed by Wheelabrator Westates. A request to terminate the air permit was issued to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (attached). The total estimated quantity of TPH-G removed by the remediation system during this quarter is ...:; 5."(. estimated to be approximately 50 lbs. Total TPH-G removed to date is approximately 500 lbs. These mass removal quantities are based upon estimated VOC concentrations, vapor flow rates and hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957 lbs), the carbon loading on March 28, 1994, was approximately 13% by weight. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Rick Riedl, P.E. No. CO49631 Project Manager Attachments: Table 1 Groundwater Elevations Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Sample Analyses Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Groundwater, March 15, 1995 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Groundwater, March 15, 1995 Letter to SJVUAPCD Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Field Data Sheets Px29go 1W.3.20 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (l) Water (ft) Elevation il) MW-I 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.~3 65.79 12/2/93 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1/94 100.00 26.70 73.30 6/3/94 100.00 27.13 72.87 9/7/94 100.00 27.86 72.14 12/2 !/94 100.00 31.42 68.58 3/15/95 100.00 29.08 70.92 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63.23 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 6/3/94 100.07 27.17 72.90 9/7/94 100.07 27.91 72.16 12/21/94 100.07 31.42 68.65 3/15/95 100.07 29.08 70.99 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 100.39 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 100.39 27.60 72.79 6/3/94 100.39 27.85 72.54 9/7/94 100.39 28.54 71.85 12/21/94 100.39 32.00 68.39 3/15/95 100.39 29.96 70.43 MW4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 100.39 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 100.39 27.25 73.14 6/3/94 100.39 27.52 72.87 9/7/94 100.39 28.30 72.09 12/21/94 100.39 31.83 68.56 3/15/95 100.39 29.33 71.06 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 100.54 27.59 72.95 6/3/94 100.54 27.92 72.62 9/7/94 100.54 28.66 71.88 12/21/94 100.54 32.17 68.37 3115195 100.54 29.92 70.62 MW-6 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 U i-l]~t'l o ~,~,.TI 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknov~n 35.36 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 100.51 28.05 72.46 6/3/94 100.51 28.31 72.20 9/7/94 100.51 28.97 71.54 12/21/94 100.51 32.17 68.34 3/15/95 100.51 29.96 70.55 MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 100.33 30.37 69.96 3/1/94 100.33 27.90 72.43 6/3/94 100.33 28.16 72.17 9/7/94 100.33 28.84 71.49 12/21/94 100.33 32.17 68.16 3/15/95 100.33 29.92 70.41 FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux m January. 1994. Page 1 of 1 PX29901W. 3.21 Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date Designation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MW-I 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 Well damaged - No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ND · 1.5 ND 12 12/2/93 80 ND 0.60 ND 13 3/1/94 82 ND ND ND 1.7 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-4 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-5 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 Well missing - No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 3/15/95 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in uod~L (ppb) TPH-G =Total Purgeable Petrolemn Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/80 l 5) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected Page 1 of 1 PX2990IW. 3.22 SITE LOCATION' ..~-.,, ....... SOURCE: TRII:~,..E A ~¢¢P OF 8AK~FIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA O' 2,000' CO~PII_ED I]Y: P.S~ PR£PARCO FOR: PRAXAIR  PREPARED BY: R.P. PR(I/ECT ~NGR. P.S. TIILE: ROUX ~C)C'IA'I'E~S OATE: 06/93 ~ co. st~,~ SCALE: ^S SHOWN SITE LOCATION PROJECT NO. 2ggolw FILE NA~£: P^TOPO-I I~AKERSFI£LO, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK I ' I b ~' I I ' r'~ j Cuw-a ~---J EXPLANATION:I m ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ' ~ . J STORAGE O' I TANK 20' 40' · COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR F~URE PREPARED BY: R.P.  PROJECT MNGR. P.S. TITLE: DXTE: o'~/93 SIll PL~ 2 RO~ ASSOCIATES ' a ~t~r PROOECt ~0. 2990~W ~ ~: PmCO~ PR~X~IR, 3505 PlERC~ RO~D, B~KERSFIELD, C~LIFOR~I~ I~w-~- (~ I 70.43 · I I I y ', ~- FOR~ER / ~W-~ 70.99 I /I I TANK / I PIERCE HIGHWAY 99 ~ /~ I / / , I ~ I I g V LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER ELEVATION I ~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) I I LPG STORAGE O' 20' 40' Compited b~ ~.R. ~repored For: Prepored by G.W. PRAXAIR FIGURE  PFOjeCt M~F: R.R. Title: Do~e: 4-6-95 ROUX ASSOCIATES Scmle: SHOWN ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER, MARCH 15, 1995 INC. g~wWonme~tml Consultin~ RevisioD: 0 Project No. 2~90~W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA FHe No: 29901004  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK ~ MW-3 J 'F ND/ND J ~ MW-7 I I I GASOLINF J j TANK J I I HIGHWAY 99III II J PIERCE ~_ MW_8 '--' J '~No/.D j ROAD 'ND/ND I EXPLANATION' I I 4~- ~w-6 ~J~-MW-1 CMW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION I ' MISSING ND/ND CONCENTRATIONS OF TPH-G/BENZENE I I I ND NOT DETECTED. FOR DETECTION LIMITS I ISEE AT[ACHED LABORATORY REPORTS I LPG O' 20' 40' I STORAGE TANK J 1 J I APPROXIMATE SCALE Compiled b)4 R.R. Prepared For: FIGURE Prepared by:. G.W. PRAXAIR  Project Mgr: R.R. Title: Dote: 4-6-9,5 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS GASOLINE (TPHIG) 8( BENZENE ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN MARCH 15, 1994 gnvironrnentol Consulting & Management Revision: 0 Project No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 29901003 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 April 5, 1995 Mr. Tom Goff Permit Services Manager San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 2700 M Street, Suite 275 Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Permit No. S-1426-1-1 Dear Mr. Goff: This letter serves as a request to terminate the permit to operate number S-1426-1-1 (attached). The basis for this request is the remediation project is complete and the vapor extraction system will be removed from the site. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the undersigned at (510) 602-2333. Sincerely, Rick Riedl Proiect Engineer enclosure cc: Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. ZAL_CC_ ABORATORIFS, RECEIVED ..... Analycioal ~ Consulting Servioes 4309 Armour Avenue (805) 395~)539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (805) 39~3069 ROUX Associates, Inc. Laboratory No: 43160 ]855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 3-15-95 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 3-22-95 Amended Report: 3-24-95 Attention: Rick Riedl Sample: Water Sample Description: Praxair, 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308 43160-1 Monitoring Well #3 43160-2 Monitoring Well #5 43160-3 Monitoring Well #7 43160-4 Monitoring Well #8 Sampled by Londo Wilkins of Zalco LaboratOries on 3-15-95 -1 -2 -3 -4 /~q/1 /~g/1 ~q/1 /~g/1 MRL Vol ati 1 e Aromat i c Hydrocarbons Benzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0..5 0.5 Toluene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 Ethyl Benzene < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 Xylenes < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 3-17-95 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline < 500 < 500 < 500 < 500 500 Method: DOHS Luft Manual Date Analyzed: 3-17-95 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level JE/1 b This report is furnished for the exclusive use o( our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible (or reporl alteration or detachment. ZALC6_ tABORATORIES, I1% ). Analytical & Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (805) 3950539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (805) 3923069 ROUX Associates, Inc. Laboratory No: 43160 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 3-15-95 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 3-22-95 Amended Report: 3-24-95 Attention: Rick Riedl Sample: Water Sample Description: Praxair, 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308/See Below Sampled by Londo Wilkins of Zalco Laboratories on 3-15-95 Field Tests: Sample Description Water Depth Monitoring Well #1 29 feet 1 inches Monitoring Well #2 29 feet I inches Monitoring Well #3 29 feet 11 1/2 inches Monitoring Well #4 29 feet 4 inches Monitoring Well #5 29 feet 11 inches Monitoring Well #6 No Test Monitoring Well #7 29 Feet ]] 1/2 inches Monitoring Well #8 29 feet 11 inches JE/lb This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zolco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET CASING DIAMETER (inches,): __~ 3 . 4. . 6 8 .12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.1~7 0.38__ 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other DATE PUROED:_.~-~ START (2400 Hr} END (2400 Hr} DATE SAMPLED: ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDI'I-Y (2~100 Hi') (gaJ,) (units) (izmhos/cm ~ 2~* C) (°F) (visual) (visu~) FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e. F5-1, XDUP-1): " PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" 81~dder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) _ __ ~.' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflone) .... Cen~-I~ugaJ Pump ~. __ _ 8ailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (St.Cr~s.s Steel) ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (St2inless S'tee0 Dipper ,,, Submersible Pump Dedicated Bailer Disposable " Dedicated REMARKS; GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI.ELD DATA SHEET CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3~ 4 6 8 12 Olher GALt, ON/tJNF'AR FOOT: 0.1.~7 0.38.~ 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Diner .... _ _ , TD ,.._ ' , DTW X u.~,~"r. X vo~uu~ : ~u-~. IPURGE''~'' DATE PURGED: ..~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,O, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (24o0 Hr) (gal.) (units) (pmhos/cm ~ 25' C) (°F) (visual) (visu~'} FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e. FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump ...... Bailer (Teflon®) ' . ._ 2' B(adder Pump ~ BaJle~ (Tel[one') ~-.._ Centrl~JgaJ Pump ...... Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler Bailer (StaJr~ SteeP/ ~ Submersible Pur~p Bailer (St~nles~ Steel) Dipper Submer~ible Pump Dedicated Bailer Disposable " Dedicated REMARKS: PAGE OF SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI.ELD DATA SHEET' CASING DI~ER On.es): ~ ~ 4 6 8 12 Olher ~LLON~N~ FOOT: 0.1~ 0.38_. 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 O~er " TO , -D~ X u-~.__, ~ ~ ~ , ~' IPURGE 'I-U DATE PURGED: ~ ........ 'l~'~ START (2400 Hr) ' ~: ~5 END (~400 Hr) ~ '~ DATE SAMPLED: ~" I~'~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 TIME VOLUME pH " E,C, TEMPE~TURE coLOR (24~ Hr) (g~,) (units) (~ho~ ~ 25' C) (~ (vicual) (~su~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8ol, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump _ X__ Bailer (Teflon®) 2.' Bladder Pump .~ Bailer tTetlon¢') ..... Centrifugal Pump :. ....Bailer (,PVC) D0L Sampler Bailer (Sl.¢nless Steel} .--..--. Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Stee~ Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated B.~iler Oispos~ble ~ Dedicated Other. : Other:. REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET CASING.DIAMETER (inches): 2 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLO ,N/LI.N..,EAR FO O~: I/ 0'1"-'--Z-7 0.;38 0,66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other .... .-_ c.¢u.o, c~,,~ . c~cu~e I ACTU~A'L _ TD'---.-.~--~--~, DTW u,~,.~'"-~. . vo~u~ : ~,u,,~e I PURGE DATE PURGED: j START (2400 Hr) F:ND (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: _ _.~'~" START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 ~¢) (gaL) (units) (izmhos/crn @ 25' C) (°F) (visual) (visu~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP-1); -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump ....... Bailer (Teflon®) . ._ 2' Bladder Pump -.-..-.-- Bailer (Teflon~') .... CentrlflJg~l Pump ...... Bailer (PVC) OOL Sampler Bailer (St.3Jnte~ Steel} ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (StaJnles~ Steel) ~ Dipper __ Submersible Pump ...... Oedic.~[ed __ B~iler Oisposable " Dedicated REMARKS: PRINT NAME: . FAGE OF SIGNATURE; '~~/~)_ ~7.//g.~-//~-,..~ GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET CASING DIAMETER ('inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.!_7 , 0.38= 0,66 1 ...~5 2.6 5.8 Other __ ..... j ACTUAL /-/Yz~q ~'"~ ' ~'~'~° /,~N'.2.:~ o I,u.R~ DATE PURGED: ~ START (2400 Hr) /_~f:'~' END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: .~-/51-' ,e..5''' START (2400 Hr} END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gaL) (unitsJ (izn~ha~/crn ~ 2";' C) ('Fl (visual) (visual FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, F8-1, XDUP-~): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' 8ladder Pump __.~/- ...... Bailer 0'ellon®) ~' Bladder Pump ~_~ Bailer (Te§on~) ~ Cen~t~g~ Pump ...... Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler B~ler (~ St~ ~ Submersible Pump __ ~iler (~n~ Dipper Subme~ible Pump Oedi~ted G~ler Disposable ~ O~i~t~ O~en ~ ~hen REM~KS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET' CASING DI~ER 0nches): _ ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other ~LLON~N~ FOOT: 0,1~ .0,38_~ 0,66 1,~ 2.6 5,8 Diner ~"~_~ '~ START (2400 H0 ~' ~9 (2400Ho DATE PURGED; END DATE SAMPLED; ~' I~"c~ START (2400 H0 END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,' E,C, TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gq.) (units) (l~nhos/cm @ 2~* C) ('F) (visual) (visu~) FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e, FB-1, XDUP-1): " PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump ._~ Bailer (Teflon(D) ..... 2' Bladder Pump .~ Bailer (Telione) ~_. -, ._ Centrifugal Pump . _ .... Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Submersible Pump __ B~iler (,Stainless Stee0 ~ D~pper Submersible Pump Dedicated __ Bailer Disposable ~ Dedicated Olhec : Other. REMARKS: RECEIVED NAR 3 ! 1995 SMCLaboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry Certificate ~1049 Client Name: Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. Address : 4400 Ashe Road, ~206 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Attention :Jon Buck Date samples collected: 3-15-95 Date analysis completed: 3-16-95 Date samples received : 3-15-95 Date of report : 3-17-95 Project Name: Paxair RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~ 287 ID: CB1-5 ug/g DLR/ug/~ Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 288 ID: CBI-10 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 289 ID: CBI-15 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005' Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~atrix Type : Soil Method of Analysis for BTEX : EPA 8020 Method of Analysis for TPH (Gasoline) : DHS GC-FID TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting u~/g : microgram per gram (ppm) ND : None Detected Stan C .Sc. Analytical Chemist 211 Aviation Street · Shafter Airport · Shafter, CA 93263 (805) 393-3597 · FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: Project Name: Paxair Project No. : RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~ 290 ID: CB1-20 ug/g DLR,ug/~ Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 291 ID: CB1-25 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0~005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 ~ 292 ID: CB1-30 u~/g DLR,ug/~ Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Stan Comer,~~M. c. Analytical Chemist Matrix Spike Summary Sheet Method: 8020/8015M Code: 2 Set: 27 Date: 3-16-95 Samples analyzed: ~286-292 Sample spiked: ~287 & ~288 Analyst: Comer Spike Data Chromatogram: ~2668, 2711 hna!ySis True Acceptable Results Value Range ug/g TPH Gasoline 15 16.0 13.0 - 19.0 Benzene 0.38 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Toluene 0.38 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Ethylbenzene 0.40 0.35 0.28 - 0.42 p-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 m-Xylene 0.39 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 o-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 Isopropyl Benzene 0.42 0.36 0.29 - 0.43 Comments: ug/g = microgram per gram (ppm) 20 uL of B-9 and 10 uL of G-117 standards used to prepare the MS and MSD. 20 grams of sample were spiked. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD ~lient ~ Date LAB Pro~ect # Project Name ' Client Project# Project Address Turn Around Requested: ff Lab Use Only. Y-~' ('~ /~',." ~' ') ( '... _, ~] 48-H13ur-Rush ~-" ' ~t: as received.: Sam~er's Signature -~ J~N~mal~,x {~__~ o ._ '~- ~..~-... [~ Mobile Lab ~ ~ ~ 0 Chilled No ~ Sealed No :.' .. _..- .......... · i_[~, --'~ / O ~linquis~ by: (Signature) ._. ~?/~iq~ ~) Received by: (Signature) Date aCompar~_- . ~ ~ ~me Company: ~me ~) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date ~) Received by ~(Signature) Date Company: Time Company: Time SAFETY & ~ONM~. -NTAL SERVICF_~ 242/) Camino Ramon Suite 225 · San Ramon, CA 94583-4207 NUMBER OF PAGES: ~ , (I:N'CLUDING COVER SHEET) ROUX ~s$o¢tete~, loc, Laborato~' No: 43160 18S1 ;atew~ Blvd,, Suite 770 Date Rece ved~ 3-15.95 Concord, CA 94520 Oa~e Rope! ted~ 3-ZZ-95 Attea~ton: Rick Rtedl Sample: Watee 431~0-2 Monltor~ng Well t5 4~160-3 Monitoring Well i? 431~0-4 Monitoring Well t~ Sampled by gondo Wllktn$ of Z~l¢o Lahore'Dries on 3-15-95 Volatile Aromatic Hy~rocarbon~ ~enzene < O.S < O.S < O.S < 0,5 O,S Toluene < 0,$ ~ 0.5 < O.S ~ O,$ O.B £thyl Benzene < 0,$ < 0.~ g 0.$ 4 0,~ 0.5 X~lenes < 0.$ ~ o.$ < 0.5 < O.S 0,$ Me~hod: EPA SO~O . Date AnalyZed: 3-17-95 Total Pe~roleum~drocarbons as Gasoline < SO0 < 800 c 500 ~ 500 $00 ~thod: DO~$ Luff Manual Date ~nalyzed: 3-]7.95 MRL - Mlnimu~ Repert(ng Level d / Lab O~erat Ions / FROM: _ _ lo~ Lopez : ....... PHONE NUiV~ER:_ _ (SRO)_866-6810 FAX: __..(SiO] 866-6896_ , NUMBER OF'PAGF. B: ~ ~ , (12~CLIYD~G COVER S~ Laboratoryt Inc. AnaI~ical ~en~ Name, ~vanced ~nvi~onmen%al Conce~s. A~d~ess ~ 4400 Ashe Roa~, $206 Bake=~fiel~, CA 93313 ';";"' A~%ention :Jon Buc~ ' -.' Da~e samples collected: 3-15-95 Date analysis completed: 3-16-~5 Date samples received : 3-15-95 Da~e of repor~ : 3-17-9~ Pro~ect Nmme~ Paxair RESULTS OP ANALYSIS: % 287 ID~ OB1-5 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenze~e ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.00~ TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 % 288 ID~ ~BI-10 u~/g DLR,u~/g Ben~en~ ND 0.00~ E~hylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.O0~ Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoli~e) ND 1.0 ~ 289 ID: CBI-I~ ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 E~hylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.00~ Xylmnes ND TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Matrix Type : Me,hod of AnalFs~s for BTEX : ~PA 8020 M~hud ~f Analys~s ~or 'r~ (~a~oline) = hMS GC-FID TR~ : TOtal Petroleum Hydrocarbons DLR : Deteu~ion Limi~ for Reporting ug/g ~ microgram per gram (ppm) ND ~ None De~ec~ed Analy~ical 211 Aviation 5~reet * Shafter Airport · Shafter, CA 93263 (805) 39.~.3597 · FA.~ (805) 3~3.36~3 r~qR 20 '95 09:~3 805 8~1 l??l t51086668~6 P~ojecC Name~ 9axatr PzoJec~ No. ~ 2.0 Benzene ND 0.005 Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 291 ID~ CB1-2§ ug/g DLR,UD/g Benzene ND 0.005 ~thylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 292 ID: OBi-30 ug/g DLR,ug/g Benzene ND 0.005 Z~hylbenzene ND 0.005 Toluene ND 0.005 Xylenes ND 0.005 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 S~an Comer, Analytical ....... ~ 831 Mat~ix:.. _ .Spike~ ~S ummar~_ Shee~_.. Me~ho~ 8020/$015M Code~ 2 Samples analyze~ ~286-292 Analys~ ~ Comer ' . . L~'~; Spike__ Da~a_ ,'. '.~, Chro~atogram= ~2668, 2711 ReSUlts Value Range TPM Gasoline 15 16.0 13,0 - 19.0 Benzene 0.38 0.34 0,27 - 0.41 TOluene 0.38 0.34 0,27 - 0..41 E~hylbenze~e 0,40 0.35 0.28 - 0,42 g-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 m-Xylene 0.39 0.34 0.27 - 0.41 o-Xylene 0.41 0.34 0.27 - 0.4~ Isop~opyl Bensene 0,42 0,36 0.29 - 0.43 Comme~ts~ ug/g = microgram per gram (ppm) 20 uL of B-9 and 10 uL of ~-117 standards used %0 prepare the MS a~d MSD. ~0 grams of sample were spiked. '~aller Service 5117 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Tel (510) 866-6800 Fax (510) 866-6912 March 6, 1995 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Ref: Underground Tank Site Remediation (Baker's Welding) 3505 Pierce Rd. Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050033) Dear Ms. Gough I would first like to thank you for responding to January 12, 1995 letter on January 24, 1995. In reviewing the conditions for closure with our consultant I believe they are very reasonable and fair. Attached for your review and confirmation is a Telephone Conversation Record, that I received from our consultant ROUX Associates. Please review each of the bullets noted and confirm that this in fact is what was agreed upon by ROUX and yourself. If there are any discrepancies please let me know, and if the record is correct a fax or call to my office would be sufficient. My phone number is (510) 866-6810, fax is (510) 866-6896. We are moving ahead to with the closure requirements, and are hopeful we can meet all our goals by the end of March 1995. Again thank you for all your time and cooperation, we look forward to bring this project to a successful conclusion. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to call me. Respectfully yours, PRAXAIR, INC. I. Joseph Lopez, R.E.A. Western Region Projects Manager cc: Rick Riedl - ROUX Associates An Atmost~here TELEI~HONE CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: February_ 7. 1995 TIME: P, Mr, PROIECT: ,29901W FROM: Dolores Gough TO: Rick,Ricdl ,,,/~/Q' COMPANY: Kern County_ .. COMPANY: ~oux Associates. Inc, TEL. NO: (805~ 861-3636 TEL. NO: (510) 602-233.3 RE: CLOSURE OF LUST SIT~_3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD_ CA Discussed closure requirements outlined in County's letter (draR) to Praxair dated .hnuary 24, 1995. Dolores Gough elaborated on closure requirements as follows: · One confirmatory boring located at removed tank site. · Collect samples at 5 foot intervals and water table. · Analyze each sample for TPH-G and BTEX. · Clean-up levels or target levels for soil is approximately ten times MCLs, or as follows: · TPI-I-G = 1 ppm; benzene = 0,01 ppm; toluene = 0.4 ppm (reference is SNARL) · ethylbe~,~ene = 0.3; and xylenes (total) -- 0.2 ppm. · Closure Plan is not required. · Notification by phone to Kern County to allow oversight. · Results of soil boring presented in letter report. · Schedule boring at any time. Schedule prior to last quarterly groundwater sampling event is O.K. · Will discuss abandoning wells after reviewing report. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT Transmittal/Memorandum To: Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Rick Riedl Date: October 26, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. PX~lW.3.13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 January 26, 1995 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 FOURTH QUARTER 1994 GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALI~FORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on December 21, 1994, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately %-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, /nc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and ~'une 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000/~g/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. PX2~901W.3.13 Mr. Joe Lopez Page 2 of 3 Januar~ 26r 1995 The ground water table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly ground water sampling events. Ground water samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells lVlW-1, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-'/, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the ground water sample collected from MW-B. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87/ag/L, toluene at 1.5/ag/L, and xylenes at 12/ag/L. Based on the quarterly monitoring results, from June 1993 to March 1994 the number of wells sampled each quarter was reduced from 6 wells to B wells. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Three monitoring wells at the Site were sampled on December 21, 1994. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Water samples were collected in a clean bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on December 21, 1994, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The ground water elevations measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 68.16 ft. to 68.65 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has fallen about 3.5 ft. since September 7, 1994. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicate the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the west at a gradient of about 0.005 (Figure 3). The ground water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient because these two wells are not screened across the water table. The lower relative water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated a downward component of ground water movement at the Site. LABORATORY RESULTS Ground water samples were analyzed by Zalco Laboratories, Inc., of Bakersfield, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site in December 1994, is presented in Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. PX2~OO1W.3.13 Mr. Joc Lopcz Page 3 of 3 January 26, 1995 The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during March 1995. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction (SVE)commenced on December 9, 1993. On June 3, 1994, the VES was shut down because the effluent vapor concentration from the first carbon filter had detectable levels of VOCs. The first carbon filter was replaced and the system was restarted on August 4, 1994. Roux is conducting weekly field monitoring .activities. Field monitoring activities include draining condensate from the system and measuring volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations of the extracted and treated vadose-zone vapors. Extracted vapor concentrations are shown on Table 3. The total estimated quantity of TPH-G removed by the first stage adsorber during this quarter is estimated to be 77 lbs. Total TPH-G removed to date is approximately 400 lbs. These mass removal'quantifies are estimated based upon measured VOC concentrations, calculated vapor flow rates and hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957 lbs), the carbon loading on December 30, 1994, is approximately 8% by weight. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Pick Piedl, P.E. ~r-d ©'~--~5 / Project Manager cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table 1 Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Table 3 Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, December 21, 1994 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, December 21, 1994 Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation PX29901W. 3.13 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (1) Water (ft) Elevation (1) MW-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 12/2/93 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1194 100.00 26.70 73.30 6/3/94 100.00 27.13 72.87 9/7/94 100.00 27.86 72.14 12/21/94 100.00 31.42 68.58 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63;23 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 6/3/94 100.07 27.17 72.90 9/7/94 100.07 27.91 72.16 12/21/94 100.07 31.42 68.65 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 100.39 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 100.39 27.60 72.79 6/3/94 100.39 27.85 72.54 9/7/94 100.39 28.54 71.85 12/21/94 100.39 32.00 68.39 MW-4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 100.39 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 100.39 27.25 73.14 6/3/94 100.39 27.52 72.87 9/7/94 100.39 28.30 72.09 12/21/94 100.39 31.83 68.56 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 100.54 27.59 72.95 6/3/94 100.54 27.92 72.62 9/7/94 100.54 28.66 71.88 12/21/94 100.54 32.17 68.37 MW-6 Nlissing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.36 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 100.51 28.05 72.46 6/3/94 100.51 28.31 72.20 9/7/94 100.51 28.97 71.54 12/21/94 100.51 32.17 68.34 MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 100.33 30.37 69.96 3/1/94 100.33 27.90 72.43 6/3/94 100.33 28.16 72.17 9/7/94 100.33 28.84 71.49 12/21/94 100.33 32.17 68.16 FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. INC. (~ Page 1 of 1 PXZ9901W2.13 Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Desi~lnation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Eth¥1benzene X¥1enes MW-1 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND . ND ND 1 Z/Z/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 Well damaged - No sample collected NIW~ 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected '~ 9/14/93 87 ND 1.5 ND 1 Z 1 Z/Z/93 80 ND 0.60 ND 13 3/1/94 8Z ND ND ND 1.7 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 1 Z/Z1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-4 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 1 Z/Z/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 1Z/Z1/94 ND ND ND ND ND IvlW-5 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected -~ 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 1 ;)/2_/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND 1 ;)/Z1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 Well missing - No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND - 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/;)/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND -----~ 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/;)/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND All concentrations reported in Fg/L (ppb) TPH-G =Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/8015) B-rEX Distinction (USEPA Method 80Z0) ND = Not Detected I:lOUX~~ INC. I~ Page 1 of 1 PXZ9901W. 2.14 Table 3. Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Date · FID Concentration (ppmv) Prior to Filters Between Filters After Filters 12/9/93 190 0 0 12/10/93 190 0 0 12/13/93 . 180 0 0 12/14/93 175 0 0 12/15/93 170 0 0 12/21/93 21 0 0 1/4/94 77 0 0 1/20/94 73 0 0 2/1/94 67 0 0 3/1/94 67 0 0 4/5/04 120 0 0 5/3/94 85 0 0 6/3/94 20 20 0 9/7/94 175 0 0 12/28/94 22 0 0 12/30/94 21 0 0 Table Notes: FID - Flame ionization detector calibrated to methane ppmv '- Parts per million by volume RQIJX~~ INC. ~ PX29gOlW.3.13 SITE LOCATION- Fmitvale J I SOURCE: ll~%E A ~P OF BAKL-RSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA :~ O' 2,000' COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR flOURE  PREPAR~ BY: R.P. PROJECT ~I~::~. P.S. rill_E: ROUX ASSOCIAI'E~ OAIE: 06/93 1 ~o~z ~ SCALE: AS SHOWN SITE LOCATION I . ~z~,o~ PROJ£C! NO. 29901W FILE NAME: PA[OPO-! BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK Mw_~i~.~ r-n , Mw-4 I I I I ~1 _~1~_ MW_2 ' ' ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ' , ~w-~ ,~w-~ I STORAGE O' I TANK 20' 40'. APPROXIMATE SCALE J COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT MNGR. P.S. TITLE: DA~: 01/93 SITE PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN PROJECT NO. 29901W FILE NAME: PAFIG01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I '--n T68.56 I I ' GASOLINE 68.65I TANK ' I HIGHWAY 99I , PIERCE I I I EXPLANATION'IROAD - UW-8 ~- ' -- -- I~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATIONI I MW-5 72.14 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL I 68.57 ~' V LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER ELEVATION I = (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) I MISSING I I I o, I i STORAGE TANK O' 20'4o'I Compiled by:. R.R. Prepored For: FIGURE Prepared by:. G.W, PRAXAIR Project Mgr: R.R. Title: Dote: 1-7-95 ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER, DECEMBER 21, 1994 Environmental Consulting Revision: 0 & Mahogement Project No. 29gOlW PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 29901004 I '¥ND/ND ,---~ , ~o~.o I I I I ' ' I I I~ rO~u~R ~UW-2 - J GASOLINE I I I I HIGHWAY ggJ ~ ~ EXPLANATION: J PIERCE j ~ ~-~ ROAD ~W-1 BONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION J J ~ ~W-5 ND/ND CONCENTRATIONS OF TPH-G/BENZENE J ~ND/ND ND NOT DETECTED. FOR DETECTION LIMITS I SEE A~ACHED ~BORATORY REPORTS J I ~ ~w-~ ~w-~ i I ' ~ISSING I ~ I , [I ~ O' 20' 40' J STORAGE TANK ~ I APPROXIMATE SCALE L ................... ,,. .] Compiled b~ R.R. Prepored For: " ' " Prepared b~ G.W. PRAXAIR FIGURE  Project ~gr: R.R. TiUe: Da~e: ~-S-S5 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEU~ HYDROCARBONS AS GASOLINE (TPH-G) ~ BENZENE ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN DECEMBER 21, l~g4 ~ [~Jronmen~ol Consullin~ Revision: 0 Pro)ect No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ' File No: 2gg01003 ENVIRONME, 'AL HEALTH SERVIC- DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M' Street, Suite 300 DIRECTOR ~ Bakerefield, CA 93301 · (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX January 24, 1995 Joseph Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Remediation, Praxair (Baker's Welding) 3505 Pierce, Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050033) Dear Mr. Lopez: We have reviewed your letter and the subject facility file to determine if site closure is appropriate at this time. Based on our review, it appears that the site may be ready for closure. However, rcmediation of the vadose zone needs to be verified by advancing a minimum of one con_fkmatory boring at the former tank location. The results must be submitted to this office within 30 days from the sampling date. Following verification that the site has been remediated to acceptable levels, the following need to be conducted before a closure letter can be issued. l. All the wells installed for this investigation must be properly abandoned. ~'/~, ~- 2. All remaining wastes such as soil cuttings and purged water generated from site activities must be disposed or recycled in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. ~ ~"-~--~-~.,~ 3. ,The vapor extraction system must bc dismantled and any resulting wastes disposed or recycled in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Thc above are our minimum requirements for closure, hence we believe a meeting at this phase of the, project may not be of benefit to either party. We appreciate your cooperation regarding this matter and if you have any questions or need further details on our requirements, please call mc at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director By: Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas \gough\050033b.eit "~aller Service 5117 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Tel (510) 866-6800 Fax (5 I0) 866-6912 January 12, 1995 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 REF: Underground Tank Site Remediation Praxair (Baker's Welding) 3505 Pierce Rd. Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050033) Dear Ms. Gough: First of all I would like to apologize for having had to cancel our two scheduled meetings this month. It is my hope that by first establishing a written dialogue of the purpose for wanting to meet with you, we can better plan to meet or eliminate the need for a meeting, based on your assessment of this letter and attachments. As you are well aware we have had the above mentioned site in one state of remediation or other related activity since 1987, and groundwater monitoring since 1989. As you recall in our meeting in May of 1993 we discussed that a timely resolution to this project would be in the best interest of Kern County and Praxair. Attached you will find a summary of our ground water monitoring actMty since October of 1989, also included in this summary is the results of our last round of quarterly sampling taken in December of 1994, (you will soon be getting the complete report). As you will note all wells monitored were Non Detectable in December. Monitoring well Number 3 has been ND for the last three quarters, and the last detectable amounts were 0.082 ppm of TPH-G and 0.0017 ppm of Xylene. Benzene has been Non Detectable for at least the last six quarters, the main constituent of concern. Based on these historical results good progress has been made, and I believe warrants a request for closure. The main reason for presenting this information for consideration for closure is that our consultant has requested that we, (Praxair) authorized additional expenditure of $75M, (see attached) to complete this project. To date we have spent a total of $165M on this project, plus $6.9M of County Over Site charges. Presently I do not feel justified in authorizing the additional $75M to gain a few more parts per million. What I would like from your office is a review of this information and consideration for my petition to close this site under Kern County guidelines now. An Atmosphere of Excellence I have committed to our consultant that I would give them an answer on there request for additional funding by the end of January 1995. Your imputes will greatly assist me in making this decision, and would greatly be appreciated. If you have any questions or concerns please call me at (510) 866-6810, if I'm not available please leave me a message. After reading this letter and reviewing the information, if you feel that a meeting would be beneficial please let me know, and I will make it a point to come to Bakersfield. Again, thank you for your cooperation and consideration of this request. Respectfully yours, PRAXAIR, INC. I. Joseph Lopez, R.E.A. Western Region Projects Manager CC: N.A. DiFranco W. J. Callahan W. E. Grunert Attachments m./jas SUMMARY , ROUND WATER SAMPLr-i ALYSES PRAXAIR/ALTAIR FACILITY, BAKERSFIELD, CA Results are in Parts Per Billion iiiiiiiii?~B~iiiii~iii~:~iAfi?~iii 05/03/90 N D N D N D N D N D - Uriah 08/07/90 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/29/90 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 07/18/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry ' Dry - Uriah 04/15/92 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Roux 06/04/93 Well dry - No sample collected - Roux 09/14-93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/02/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 03/01/94 ND ND ND ND ND iiiiii~:!~:~.~i i~ii~ ~i~!iiii~ 10/1 g/8g 125 22.2 2.4 1.17 ND - Uriah 05/03/90 370 43 33 31 26.3 - Uriah 08/07/90 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 11/29/90 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 07/18/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 04/15/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Roux 06/04/93 Well dry - No sample collected :~ii ~:i::~:~.~ i!~?~yi~[~ii!il; 10/1 g/8g 3076 90 140 550 gg0 - Uriah 05/03/90 11,000 360 3100 30 1590 - Uriah 08/07/90 6,000 220 2700 84 770 - Uriah 11/29/90 18,000 200 3800 260 3110 - Uriah 07/18/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 04/15/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Roux 06/04/93 Well dry - No sample collected - Roux 09/14-93 87 ND 1.5 ND 12 - Roux 12/02/93 80 ND 0.60 ND 13 - Roux 03/01/94 82 ND ND ND 1.7 - Roux 06/03/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 09/07/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND Page 1 of 2 Rev. 01/10/95 PRAXAIPJALTAIR BAKEF~ELD, CA GROUND WATER SAMPLE ANALYSES (CON"I') ~i~:::::~i~?!M~::~:::~:?::~[~:.:.:.:?:~i~ 05/03/90 1900 110 110 - Uriah 08107~90 120 5.6 35 8.9 ND - Uriah 11129/90 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 07/18/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 04115/92 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Roux 06104/93 Well dry - No sample collected - Roux 09/14-93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/02/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 03/01/94 ND ND ND ND . ND - Roux 06103/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 09/07/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND i iii~:M~Sil ~iiiUi~i~iiiili 05103190 6000 68 130 240 969 - Uriah 08/07190 7100 48 470 380 1490 - Uriah 11/29/90 640 26 19 3.5 7154 - Uriah 07118191 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 04/15/92 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Roux 06104193 Well dry - No sample collected - Roux 09/14-93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/02/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 03/01/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 06/03/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 09/07/94 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/21/94 ND ND ND ND ND iil.i.:?:.ii~:~6:~ i~:! ~ ~!alii::iiii 05~03~90 83 ND ND ND 2 - Uriah 08~07~90 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 11129190 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 07/18/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 11/07/91 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry - Uriah 04/15/92 Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Missing after paving * i !:!~:i~!~:~.~:?:~ii:~i[iah:::~:~::! 07/18/91 490 67 19 ND ND - Uriah 11/07/91 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 04115~92 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 06104193 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 09114-93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/02/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 03/01/94 ND ND ND ND ND ii~i~;i ii~ ~!i ~iii~ii!~iii~ii 07/18/91 71 ND 1.0 ND 1.3 - Uriah 11/07/91 ND ND ND ND ND - Uriah 04/15/92 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 06/04/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 09/14-93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 12/02/93 ND ND ND ND ND - Roux 03/01/94 ND ND ND ND ND · Found Wk of 12/19/94 Page 2 of 2 Rev.01/10/95 Praxatr, Bakersfield Califomia Table 1, Cost Estimate for Amendment No.6, December 1994 to May 1995. [ I ROUX Hours ROUX Subcontractor Rates $145 $80 $80 $50 $55 1. VES O&M Field screening 36 3 $3,030 $300 $1,725 $550 Zalco site visits 1 per week Equipment Maintenance 12 6 $1,260 $200 $345 $600 Parts inc. new gages Permit 0.5 $40 $77 ~mit fee Carbon Rental 2 $100 $50 $2,254 Westates Rental for 7 months Remove Carbon from site 4 1 $370 $50 $3,061 Westates service contract & manifesting 2. Other Sources of Contamination Limited phase 1 report 2 12 i 8 4 $2,370 $100 $474 ER[IS report and investigations County file search & report 4 8 2 $1,060 $100 Trip combined with Closure Plan Scoping(below) 3. Existing Site Conditions I Soil bore to 30' bgs 6 12 4 $1,640 $700 $1,000 $155 Drilling sub. labor & expenses for 1 bore, ROUX travel to site, field supplies. Dispose of soil. Report and Analytical 2 8 2 6 4 $1,610 $200 $510 3 soil TPH/BTEX, 1 vapor TPH/BTEX Locate Well MW6 4 1 $370 $50 $150 metal detector method Locate MW6, alternative #2 2 10 20 2 $2,790 $700 $5,200 $200 excavation method (if metal detector fails) 4. lIST Closure Closure Plan and criteria scoping with County 4 40 8 4 $4,400 $700 ROUX travel to site and expenses 3 soil bores to 30"ogs 4 15 2 $1,620 $900 $3,000 Drilling sub. labor & expenses for 3 bores, ROUX travel to site, field supplies Abandon 8 existing wells and v/ remove remediation system 2 10 16 4 I $2,625 $800 $11,000 $500 KES to pressure grout wells and resurface ROUX travel to site and repo~ preparation Dispose of purge water and soil, dispose of up to 10 drams water and 5 drums soil as and transport equipment to 2 12 4 $1,320 $700 $1,000 non-hazardous waste Pittsburg, CA ROUX travel to site and expenses Closure Report and analytical 4 30 6 8 4 $4,080 $500 $1,320 9 soil TPH/BTEX, 2 vapor TPH/BTEX Subtotal 16.0 182.5 91.0 71.0 17.0 $28,685 $6,050 $22,270 $10,851 Contingency 10% 1.6 18.3 9.1 7.1 1.7 $2,869 $605 $3,341 $1,085 Service Charge Colunm Totals 17.6 200.8 100.1 78.1 18.7 $31,554 $6,655 $25,611 $11,936 Subcontractor Total $37,546 Grand Total $75,755 Page I of I PX29901W.3.? j -'~- ~J,IW- 7 ,ND/ND :':-'::/:" ..... ' ~ EXPLANATION: · -r' ; ~w-8-~- L_ _ ~ oI ND/ND-- ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION ~D DESIG~TION I : I (.. ~/ND ND NO} DETECTED. FOR DgECTION LIMITS I SEE A~ACHED ~BO~TORY REPORTS I .:" .': D/ND '::":":' ' ": i s~o~[ O' 20' 40' ~ ' ' ~"~ ~ ;: C.~-::. :~ :. ::' '?' ===================== :"'  ..... · Dote: 3/94 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH-G)/BENZENE ";-'=":~? ~('~:~t-'" ,x ,SSOC,,~S,NC. ~o,e: SHO~ IN GROUND W~I[R, g~RCH 1, 1~4 ~mentot Con.trig ~evision: 1 -'/:~:47~::~. ........ e~o~og .... ~ Pro,ct No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Transmittal/Memorandum To: Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Rick Riedl Date: October 26, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT ~ 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 Transmittal/Memorandum To: Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 From: Rick Riedl Date: October 26, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: Please find enclosed one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board PX29901W.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 6'02°2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 Transmittal/Memorandum To: Mr. John Noonan California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Fresno Branch Office 3615 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 From: Rick Riedl Date: October 26, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. PX29~1W.3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT ~ 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 October 26, 1994 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on September 7, 1994, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure I). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately l/:-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000 ~g/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. P~9~1W.3.4 Mr. Joe Lopez Page 2 of 3 October 26. 1994 The ground water table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly ground water sampling events. Ground water samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the ground water sample collected from MW-3. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87/~g/L, toluene at 1.5/~g/L, and xylenes at 12 t~g/L. Based on the quarterly monitoring results from June 1993 to March 1994 the number of wells sampled each quarter was reduced from 6 wells to 3 wells. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux personnel sampled three monitoring wells at the Site on September 7, 1994. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on September 7, 1994, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 27.86 to 28.97 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has fallen about 0.7 ft. since June 3, 1994. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the west at a gradient of about 0.006 (Figure 3). The ground water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient because these two wells are about 20 ft. deeper than wells MW-1 through MW-5 and the current water levels are about 18 ft. above the top of the perforated intervals of these two wells. The lower relative water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated a downward component of ground water movement at the Site. LABORATORY RESULTS Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on September 7, 1994, is presented on Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. I=IOUX.4~.SSCX~4t'I~ II, lC. {~ Px~o~w.3.4 Mr. Joe Lopez Page 3 of 3 October 26, 1994 The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during December 1994. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction (SVE) commenced on December 9, 1993. On June 3, 1994, the VES was shut down because the effluent vapor concentration from the first carbon filter had detectable levels of VOCs. The first carbon filter was replaced and the system was restarted on August 4, 1994. Roux is conducting monthly field monitoring activities. Field monitoring activities include measuring volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations with a flame ionization detector (FID), and taking vacuum and pressure readings for the SVE system. Field monitoring results are shown on Table 3. The total estimated quantity of TPHoG removed by the first stage adsorbe~"~-~iS.ng this quarter is estimated to be 9 lbs. Total TPH~G removed to date is approximately(328 lbs'. These mass removal quantities are estimated based upon measured VOC concentrati6ns-;~"ehlculated 201~&,,37,,._ flow rates and hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957zl~e'.~.~O?, carbon loading on September 7, 1994, is approxi mately 1% by weight. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. , / Rick Riedl, P.E. / Greg~y l~urphy, R.G. Project Engineer ,~ California Registered Geologist No. 5303 cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table I Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Table 3 Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, September 7, 1994 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, September 7, 1994 Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (1) Water (ft) Elevation (1) M~W-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 12/2/93 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1/94 100.00 26.70 73.30 6/3/94 100.00 27.13 72.87 9/7/94 100.00 27.86 72.14 MW-2 .6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63.23 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 6/3/94 100.07 27.17 72.90 9/7/94 100.07 27.91 72.16 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 100.39 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 100.39 27.60 72.79 6/3/94 100.39 27.85 72.54 917194 100.39 28.54 71.85 MW-4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 100.39 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 100.39 27.25 73.14 6/3/94 100.39 27.52 72.87 917194 100.39 28.30 72.09 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 100.54 27.59 72.95 6/3/94 100.54 27.92 72.62 9/7/94 100.54 28.66 71.88 MW-6 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.36 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 100.51 28.05 72.46 6/3/94 100.51 28.31 72.20 9/7/94 100.51 28.97 71.54 MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 100.33 30.37 69.96 3/1/94 100.33 27.90 72.43 6/3/94 100.33 28.16 72.17 9/7/94 100.33 28.84 71.49 FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site ~latum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. Page I of I PX29901W. 2. 11 Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Designation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Eth¥1benzen Xylenes MW-1 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 Well damaged - No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ND 1.5 ND 12 12/2/93 80 ND 0.60 ND 13 3/1/94 82 ND ND ND 1.7 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 917194 ND ND ND ND ND MW-4 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND ~ 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-5 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ~ ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND 6/3/94 ND ND ND ND ND 9/7/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 Well missing - No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TPH-G =Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/8015) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected Page 1 of 1 PX29501W. 2. 12 Table 3. Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Date FID Concentration (ppmv) Prior to Filters Between Filters After Filters 12/9/93 190 0 0 12/10/93 190 0 0 12/13/93 180 0 0 12/14/93 175 0 0 12/15/93 170 0 0 12/21/93 21 0 0 1/4/94 77 0 1/20/94 73 0 0 2/1/94 67 0 0 3/1/94 67 0 0 4/5/04 120 0 0 5/3/94 85 0 0 6/3/94 20 20 0 9/7/94 175 0 0 Table Notes: FID = Flame ionization detector calibrated to methane ppmv = Parts per million by volume ;OURCE: ~IP~E A ~ OF U(ERSFIE~, CAUFORNIA AREA O' 2,000' 'COI,IPLI~ BY: P.S. PREPARE) FOR: PRAXAIR I:lOt,IRE  PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT UNGR. P.S. tITLE: )UX ~TES OA~: 06/93 ~ ,m,,~,~ SC/~E: ~ SltO~I SITE LOCATION / PRO, JECI' NO. 2~J01W F~_E ~.~£: PAI'OPO-I BAKERSFIELD. CAUFORNIA I -~uw-8 L__ EXPLANATION'I' 03 . '~'MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION ANO DESIGNATION " MISSING LPO ' I STORAO[ 0' I TANK 20' 40', e APPROXIMAT~ SCALE. COMPIEO BY: P.s. PREPARED FOR: "PRAXAIR .... ~R[  P~EP~ED ~: R.P, , ........... : ..... PR~ECT MNGR. P.S. T~LE: DA~:, 01/93 SITE PLAN 9 RO~ ASSOC~Tg3 ~E: ~ SHOWH FILE ~ME: .... PAFIGO1 PRAXAI~, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA UW-4 ~-~ EXPLANATION: m I ~MW-I MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ~ I 71.88-- ~W-5~ 72.14 GROUND WATER EL~ATIONS LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER EL~ATION ~ ~ J ~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) = / ~ J / ~-% .~-~ I ~ o/ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' i LPg J STORAGE O' 20' 40' TANK Compiled b~ ~.S. ,Prepored [or: ' Prepored b~ V.W.S. PRAXAIR  Project Mgr: P.S. !Title: Date: 3/94 ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. score: SHO~ SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 gn~ronmentol ~on~ltin~ Revision: 3 · Monogemen~ Projec~ No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 5505 PI[RCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 2990100~ I ~'~ MA,. BUiLDiNG LOAD~NO DOCK ND/ND I MW-3 ua/ua I ~ I ~uw-2 0 m ~uw-~+ EXPLANATION: -- ~ ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIG~TION I ~ MW-5 ND/ND CONCENT~TION OF TPH-G/BENZENE ND/ND NO NOT DETECTED. FOR D~ECTION LIMITS ~SS~NG I J ~ STORAGE j TANK O' 20' J . . APPR~X[~T~ S~A~... Oompiled b~ ~.S. Prepared For: Prepared b~ V.W.S. PRAXAIR Da~e: ~/g~ CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PUROEABLE PETROLEU~ HYDROCARBONS (TPH-O)/BENZENE Roux ASSOOIATES INO. Scale: SHO~ IN GROUND WATER, SEPTEMBER 7, lgg4 · ~.~,m~l '~ro]ec~ No. 2ggo1w PRAXAIR, 3505 PIEROE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, OALIFORNIA File No: 2ggo~o04 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrbc Water Received: Sep 8, 1994~ ~Concord, CA 94520 Analysis Method: EPAS030/8015/8020 Reporte;l.~: Sep'21, 1994~ Attention: Pau~ S~p~e First Sample ~: 40g-0500 . ~ TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Sample Analyte Umit I.D. I.D. I.D. #g/L 409-0500 409-0501 409-0502 MW5-W MW4-W MW3-W Purge. able Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.Do N.D. Benzene 0.50 N.D. N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.50 N.D. N.D. N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.50 N.D. N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.50 N.D. N.D. N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: ...... Quality Control Data Report Limit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 Instrument Identification: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Surrogate Recovery, %: 104 103 105 (QC Emits = 70-130%) · Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. Anaiytes reported as N.D, were not detected above the stated reporting limit. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4090500.ROU < 1 > Sequoia 1900 ~t~ ~cnuc, ~i~c L ~, ~ 94520 (510) 6~-~ F~ (510) 686-~89 al cal HOUX ~kssocmms . C;lientPr~e~t lU: i-'rm~r 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Matrix: Uquid Concord, CA 94520 - Attention: Paul Supple QC Sample Group: 4090500-2 Reporte~l: Sep 21, 1994~! QUAUTY CONTROL DATA REPORT ANALYTE Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes Benzene Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: J.F. J.F. J.F. J.F. MS/MSD Batch#: 4o90501 4d90501 4090501 4090501 Date Prepared: 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 Date Analyzed: 9/13/94 9/13/94 g/13/94 g/13/94 Instrument I.D.#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Cone. Spiked: 20/~g/L 20 #g/L 20 Hg/L 60 #g/L Matrix Spike % Recovery: 105 110 110 108 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery: 1to 110 1to t08 Relative % Difference: 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LCS Batch#: 3LCS091394 3LCS091394 3LCS091394 3LCS091394 Date Prepared: 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 Date Analyzed: 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 9/13/94 Instrument I,D,#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 LCS % Recovery: 96 101 101 100 [ % Recovery ........ I Control Umits: 71-133 72-128 72-130 71-120 [ Please Note: [ The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents, SEQUOIA ~NA/~YTICAL, #1271 , preparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike Is an aliquot of sample [fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If ~thc :e¢cvery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix I interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4090500. ROU <2> CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO 01043 ~l~X. A~~s INC ,s55 GATEWAY BOULEVARD. SUITE ,7;' / .... ANALYSES ". pA(;E i OF vironmentol Cons, '/ting CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 / / ~2 / / / * Mono~,ment Tel. (510)602-2333 · Fax (510) 687-1258 .. / / (~ / PROJECT LOCATION / ,~ / [~ ,~/ / / / DATE TIME SEAL RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME S~L RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME S~L RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME INTACT INTACT Y OR N Y OR N RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME SE~ RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME SEAL ~ELIVERY" METHOD COMMENTS '" ANAL~ICAL ~BO~TORY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 Transmittal/Memorandum To: Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Paul Supple [~> Date: July 27, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. Px2ggoIw.3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT ~ 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX~ 510 687-1258 July 27, 1994 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on June 3, 1994, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on.~ the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately ½-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (FigUre 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000/~g/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. MOnitoring well lViW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. PX29901W.3.2 Mr. Jo~ Lopcz Page 2 of 3 July 27, 1994 ~.. The ground water table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly ground water sampling events. Ground water samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells MW-I, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene; ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the ground water sample collected from MW-3. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87/~g/L, toluene at 1.5/~g/L, and xylenes at 12/~g/L. Based on the quarterly monitoring results from June 1993 to March 1994 the number of wells sampled each quarter was reduced from 6 wells to 3 wells. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux personnel sampled three monitoring wells at the Site on June 3, 1994. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Ground water sample field data sheets are provided in the Attachments. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on June 3, 1994, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 27.13 to 28.31 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has fallen about 0.5 ft. since March 1, 1994. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-I through MW-5 indicated the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the west at a gradient of about 0.006 (Figure 3). The ground water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient because these two wells are about 20 ft. deeper than wells MW-1 through MW-5 and the current water levels are about 18 ft. above the top of the perforated intervals of these two wells. The lower relative water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated a downward component of ground water movement at the Site. LABORATORY RESULTS Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A stimmary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on June 3, 1994, is:.presented on Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. Mr. Joe Lopez Page 3 of 3 July 27, 1994 Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during September 1994. REMEDIATION' SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction (SVE) commenced on December 9, 1993. The initial startup operation was performed during the month of December 1993. During startup, vapor grab samples were obtained and analyzed fOr TPH-G and BTEX. Roux is conducting monthly field monitoring activities. Field monitoring activities include measuring volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations with a flame ionization detector (FID), and taking vacuum and pressure readings for the SVE system. Field monitoring results are shown on Table 3. The total estimated quantity of TPHoG removed by the first stage adsorber during this quarter is estimated to be 194 lbs. Total TPH-G removed to date is approximately 322 lbs. These mass removal quantities were estimated based upon measured concentrations of TPH-G, measured VOC concentrations, measured vapor flow rates and estimated hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957 lbs), the carbon loading is 34% by weight. On the last site visit (June 3, 1994), the effluent vapor concentration from the first carbon filter had detectable levels of VOCs. The VES was immediately shut-down. The first carbon filter will be replaced and the system ~ill be restarted prior to the next sampling event. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC.. Senior Hydrogeologist California Registered Geologist No. 5687 cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table 1 Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Table 3 Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan ...... Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, June 3, 1994 _.. Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, June 3, 1994 Ground Water Sample Field Data Sheets Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation I1~,i1~1"!~ I1~ 1~ PX29901W.3.2 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Watcr Level Number Measured Elevation (1) Water (ft) Elevation MW-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 1212193 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1/94 100.00 26.70 73.30 6/3/94 100.00 27.13 72.87 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 ' D~ 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63223 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 6/3/94 100.07 27.17 72.90 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 10039 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 10039 27.60 72.79 6/3/94 10039 27.8s 7234 MW4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 10039 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 10039 27.25 73.14 6/3/94 x- 10039 27.52 72.87 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 100..54 27.59 72.95 6/3/94 100.54 27.92 72.ca MW- Missing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 3536 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 100.51 28.05 72.46 6/3/94 100.51 2831 7220 MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 10033 3037 69.96 3/1/94 10033 27.90 72.43 6/3/94 10033 28.16 72.17 FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Desi~nation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzcne Xyienes MW-1 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9114193 ND ND ND ND ND ~/~_/~ ND NO NO ND NO MW-2 Well damaged - No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ND L5 ND n/2/93 3/1/94 82 ~o ND ND 1.7 6/3/94 NO IVlW-4 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 3/1/94 6/3/94 MW-5 6/4/93 = Well dry - No sample collected 6/3/94 No No NO ND NO lVlW-6 Well missing - No sample collected ~v~v-7 6/4/93 MW-8 6/4/93 ~0 ~ ND ND ~I) FOOTNOTES ....... All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) .. :. TPH-G = Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/8015) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected Table 3. Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Date Analytical TPH-G Concentration (ppmv) FID Concentration (ppmv) Prior to Filters Prior to Filters Between Filters After Filters 12/9/93 350 190 0 0 12/10/93 310 190 0 0 12/13/93 470 180 0 0 12/14/93 440 175 0 0 12/15/93 130 170 0 0 12/21/93 160 21 0 0 1/4/94 66 77 0 0 1/20/94 290 73 0 0 2/1/94 NA 67 0 0 3/1/94 NA 67 0 0 4/5/04 NA 120 0 0 5/3/94 NA 85 0 0 6/3/94 NA 20 20 0 Table Notes: FID = Flame ionization detector calibrated to methane ppmv = Parts per million by volume NA = Not Applicable SITE SOURCE: [RPtE A IdAP OF ~AKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ O' 2,000' COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIOJR[ : Pffi~JECT MN~R. P.S. TITLE: ~OUX ASSOCIATES OA~E: 0~/93 ~ o~s~ SCALE: AS SHO~N SITE LOCATION / ~ ~ PROdECT NO. 29gO1W i FIL~ NA~: PATOPO-! BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I ~uw-~ --J EXPLANATION: ' o .,, ~ . -~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND OESIGNATION I_"'~ ' ~ ' ' MISSING · I LPO ' J STORAOE O' I TANK 20' 40' J APPROXI~AT[ DA~: , , , 01/93 , SITE PLAN RO~ ASSOCIAT~ S~E: ~ SHO~N · ~ PR~ECT NO. 29901~ FILE ~UE:.... PAFIGO1 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA n · ~ MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK / / / I , I ?w-~ ( ~,'?~ ~ ,,~? I I /?-,.~ ~- / I Il', / I /~ ~ /~.~o '. I J /~ ~ / r J < m j ~_~ ~u ~ ~ EXPLANATION: ~BW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESI8NATION J ~ I ~ ~w-5 ~ ~ ~ 72.87 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS I LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER ELEVATION ~ ~ J ~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) J LPg J '.,. STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' J ~ L J .... APPROXIMATE SCA~ . J Compiled b~ P.S. Prepared For: Prepared b~ V.W.S. PRAXAIR FIGURE  ProJeot Mgr: P.S. Date: ~/g4 ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER ROUX ASSOCIA~S INC. Scal~: SHO~ JUNE ~, 1994 En~ronmenlol Consulting ~ Monogement Revision: 2 Pro~ect No. 29901W PEAXAIE, 3505 PI[ECl ROAD, BAK[RSFI[LD, CALIFORNIA File No: 29901005 ND/ND ,ND/ND I ~__~ ~w-~ I I I I ~l -r i ~v_8~ ~-~ EXPLANATION: ~ ~w-1 MONITORING ~ELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATIONI I ~~w-s ND/ND CONCENTRATION OF TPH-O/BENZEN[ ND/ND ND NO~ DElECTED. FOR DETECTION LIMITS I SEE A~ACHED ~BORATORY REPORTS I I '~ ~ I I '~ STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' I L ......... ~,,,ox,~,~ ~ . ] ~ompiled b~ P.S. Prepored For: ' ~ .... Prepored b~ V.W.S. PRAXAIR F~OuR~  Project Mgr: P.S. ~Ile: ~te: ~/94 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH-G)/BENZENE Roux ASSOC~A~S ~NC. S~le: SHO~ IN GROUND WATER, JUNE 3, 1994 ~ ~o~pe~e~ Revision: 2 Pro~ect No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 29901004 GROUND WATER SAMPLE FtELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: '~ (~OI I.~ WELL ID: H [,~ - ,,~ CLIENT/STATION#: ~¥~.~', ~ t,.~'t'~'~.~ ADDRESS: CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other ! ACTUAL 'm q~..q70TW ~J?.~x ~ c~,~ c~ct.~'rm ~'7., 'r7 I PURGE DATE PURGED: (~_~_ c~ START (2400 Hr) IG'. 05 END (2400 Hr) /~,' /~' DATE SAMPLED: G-~'?~ START (2400 Hr) t G: J5 END (2400 Hr) /5:'2~3 TIME VOLUME pH .- E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (24o0 PI (ga~.) (un~) (~=/cm @ 25' C) C~ (vi~aJ) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED A'I'THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): - PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ~ 8aJ3er (Teflon®) ~ 2' 81adder Pump ~_ 8m~er (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump 8a~er (PVC) DDL Sampler BaJle~ (Stainless Steel) Submemrole Pump Bailer (Stainless Stee~ Dipper Submemible Pump · Dedicated · .. Ba~ler Oisposable Dedicated Other: Other:. REMARKS: '~' ' GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~ ~. ~ ~ ! f4.) W~LL ID: J~ [4,) - ~ GASING DIAMETER (inches): ~--~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/UNEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TD t/o~ .0°~- OTW ;D,5:~X u.~.c'~°" . I'~ X '~x~ec~ ~ = c.~=~ r7' ~/ I P~RGE DATE PURGED: ~-~-~q' START (2400 Hr) 15/6 END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: (~'3' c]~ START (2400 Hr) /~'3 z/ END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ,. E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (34oo H0 (ga.) (uras) (~,/cm @ 25' C) FF) (v~ua) f5 23 z .S ~. o v ~ 2 c~ '75.5 ~,~o FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): - PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ,~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump .~' Baler (Teflon®) ~gal Pump Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submers~e Pump Baler (Stainless Steel) Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated flakier Oisposable Oedlc~ted REMARKS: .:' · PAGE ~_. OF ~ SIGNATURE: '" GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI-ELD DATA SHEET PRO~ECT NO: ~9°~0 1 ~0 WEU_ ~D: /fl ~-~ CUe~/STA~ON #: ~XA~'~ ~~ ADDRESS: %~5 ~ ~. ~ING DIAMETER (inches): (~'~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 ,. 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other ~ 17 x c~ ~_~ C~.c~.~E~ ~7, ~ P, URGE ~ ~' DATE PURGED: ~-~-?/-/ START (2400 Hr) /z/~o END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ ..~. ~,Z, START (2400 Hr) //7/ z/~ END (2400 Hr) //'/~'~:~ TIME VOLUME pH .- E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (~cm @ 25' C) C'P--} (visuaJ) (visual) RELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1. XDUP-1): - PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' 8ladder Pump ~'~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump .,/~ Bailer (Teflon®) , Ce[~i~ugal Pump Bai~er (PVC) DOL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) , Submemil31e Pump Sailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper . Submemible Pump Dedicated 8a~er Disposable Dedicated Other. Other. REMARKS: -: * · PAGE .~2 OF % SIGNATURE: ' " Sequoia 'y" '.na _.ca, 819 Stdker Avenue, ~ite 8 Sacamento, ~ 95834 (916) 921-9~ F~ (916) 921-01~ Roux Associates ~lent Prelect ID: Praxalr Bakersfleld/#29901W ~'~]: ~Jun 3, 1 18~5 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrix: Water Roeelved: Jun 6, Concord, CA 94520 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/8015/8020 Reported: Jun. 16, 1994iiii Attention: Paul Supple First Sample #: 40643323 TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Sample Analyte Umit I.D. I.D. I.D. pg/L 40643323 40643324 40643325 MW5 . MW4 MW3 Purgeable Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.D. N.D. Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: ...... Quality Control Data Report Limit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 Instrument Identification: HP-2 HP-2 HP-2 Surrogate Recovery, %: 100 100 99 (QC Limits = 70-130%) Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. ........ Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit, SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL, #1271 Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4060323,ROU < 1 > 819 Striker Avenue. ~Uite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Matrix: Uquid iiConcord, CA 94520 Attention: Paul Supple . QC Sample Group: 4060323-5 Reported: Jun 16, 1994::i::?:... QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT ANALYTE Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes Benzene Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: A.T. /LT. /LT. A.T. MS/MSD Batch#: 4060373 4060373 4060373 4060373 Date Prepared: 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 Date Analyzed: 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 Instrument I.D.#: HP-2 HP-2 HP-2 HP-2 Conc. Spiked: 20/zg/L 20 #g/L 20 #g/L 60 #g/L Matrix Spike % Recovery: 105 100 100 103 Matrix Spike Duplicate % :-" Recovery: 110 10o lOO 103 Relative % Difference: 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LCS Batch#: 1LCS061594 1LCS061594 1LCS061594 1LCS061594 Date Prepared: 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 Date Analyzed: 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 6/15/94 Instrument I.D.#: HP-2 HP-2 HP-2 HP-2 LCS % Recovery: 106 102 103 103 1% RecOvery I Control Limits: 71-133 72-128 72-130 71-120 I Please Note: . - ' I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents, SEQUOIA, A~!ALYTICAL, #1271 J preparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample ~ fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure, tf · k._~ %~.. I,,e re6ovory of analytes from tho matrix spike does not fall within specified control limit~ due to matrix J interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4060323.ROU <2> ~ CHAINOF CUSTODY. JO d.[t.C.~ , ,q'T- No 00545 Ground-Water Consultants , /. ANALYSES 0 ' , PAGE ROUXA$$OCIATE$INC /.~ / / / / / // PR~)JECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER SAMPLER'S D~TE TIME S~L RECEDED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE ~ME SEAL RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE ~IME S~L RECEI~D BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE INTACT INTACT Y OR N Y OR N RELINQUI~ED B~: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME S~ RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE INTACT ' INTA~ Y OR N Y OR N DELIVERY M~HOD COMMENTS ANAL~ICAL ~ORATORY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 Transmittal/Memorandum To: Ms. Dolores Gough ' .. Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Paul Supple ~ Date: March 31, 1994 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxalr, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. Doc #PX29901W. 1.20 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 March 31, 1994 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on March 1, 1994, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately ¼-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000/zg/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells dropped steadily for several years after the wells were installed. At the time of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. Doc #PX29901 W. 1.20 Mr. Joe Lopez Page 2 of 4 March .31, 1994 The ground water table elevation rose about 14 ft. between the June and September 1993 quarterly ground water sampling events. Ground water samples collected in September 1993 from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 were analyzed for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX). Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were present above method detection limits only in the ground water sample collected from MW-3. Sample MW-3 contained concentrations of TPH-G at 87 ~g/L, toluene at 1.5 t~g/L, and xylenes at 12/~g/L (Table 2). SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux personnel sampled six monitoring wells at the Site on March 1, 1994. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Ground water sample field data sheets are provided in the Attachments. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on March 1, 1994, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 26.70 to 28.05 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has risen about 2 ft. since December 2, 1993. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the west at a gradient of about 0.008 (Figure 3). The ground water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient because these two wells are about 20 ft. deeper than wells MW-1 through MW-5 and the current water levels are about 18 ft. above the top of the perforated intervals of these two wells. The lower relative water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated a downward component of ground water movement at the Site. LABORATORY RESULTS Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for TPH-G, and BTEX by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on March 1, 1994, is presented on Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. Ground water sample MW-3 contained detectable concentrations of TPH-G at 82/~g/L, and xylenes at 1.7 txg/L. Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were not ~#XlX~~ II~-.. {~ Doc #PX29901W. 1.20 Joe Lopez Pnge 3 of 4 Mnrch 31, 1~94 detected in the MW-3 sample (Table 2). TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on. Figure 4. The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during June 1994. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Soil remediation by soil vapor extraction (SVE) commenced on December 9, 1993. Present at the Site for the first day of operation were personnel from Roux, Zalco Laboratories, Inc. (7_.alco), and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (APCD). The SVE system is in compliance with the conditions in the air permit issued by the APCD. The initial startup operation was performed between December 9 and December 15, 1993. Following the startup period, Roux conducted five follow-up field monitoring activities. Field monitoring activities included taking vapor grab samples and concentration readings with a flame ionization detector (FID), and taking vacuum and pressure readings for the SVE system. All vapor grab samples were analyzed by Zalco for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (Table 3). Field monitoring results are shown on Table 4. The quantity of petroleum hydrocarbons removed from the subsurface is based upon analytical and field monitoring results, vapor extraction rates, and the hours of operation. Figure 5 chronologically shows the total volume of product recovered. The total amount of product recovered to date is approximately 21 gallons. Figure 5 indicates that most of the product was recovered within the first week of operation. The total estimated quantity of VOCs removed by the first stage adsorber during operation from December 9, 1993, through March 1, 1994, is estimated to be 114 lbs. This mass removal quantity was estimated based upon measured concentrations of TPH, measured vapor flow rate and estimated hours of operation. Given the mass of carbon in the first filter (957 lbs), the carbon loading is currently 12% by weight. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul Supple Todd Ramsden, R.G. Senior Hydrogeologist California Registered Geologist No. 5687 cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Doc # PX2990 I W. 1.20 Mr, Joe Lopez Page 4 of 4 March 31, 1994 Attachments: Table 1 Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Table 3 Summary of Vapor Grab Sample Analytical Results Table 4 Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, March 1, 1994 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, March 1, 1994 Figure 5 Total Product Recovered Ground Water Sample Field Data Sheets Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (1) 'Water (ft) Elevation MW-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 12/2/93 100.00 28.90 71.10 3/1/94 100.00 26.70 7330 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63.23 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 3/1/94 100.07 26.82 73.25 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 100.39 29.80 70.59 3/1/94 10039 27.60 72.79 MW4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 12/2/93 100.39 29.43 70.96 3/1/94 10039 27.25 73.14 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100.54 29.86 70.68 3/1/94 10034 2739 72.95 MW-6 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 3536 Unknown 12/2/93 100.51 30.51 70.00 3/1/94 10031 28.05 72.46 MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unknown 12/2/93 100.33 30.37 69.96 3/1/94 10033 27.90 72.43 FOOTNOTES _ (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Desi~natlon Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MW-1 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND' 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 Well damaged - No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample colle~cted 9/14/93 ~? ND 1.5 ND 12 ~ 12/2/93 $0 ND 0.60 ND 13 ~- 3/1/94 82 ND ND ND 1.7 ~ MW-4 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample coll¢ct~d 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-5 6/4/93 Well dry - No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 Well missing - No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND 3/1/94 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TP_H-G =Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (USEPA Method 5030/8015) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected · Prnxnir, Inc. 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Table 3. Summary of Vapor Grab Sample Analytical Results Date TPH (ppmv) .... Benzene (ppmv) Toluene (ppmv) Ethylbenzene (ppmv) Xylenes (ppmv) Prior to Between Prior to Between Prior to Between Prior to Between Prior to Between Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters Filters 12/9/93 350 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 56 ND 12/10/93 310 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 53 ND 12/13/93 470 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 73 ND 12/14/93 440 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 57 ND 12/15/93 130 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 24 ND 12/21/93 160 ND 2.48 ND ND ND ND ND 27.1 ND 1/4/94 66 ND ND ND ND ND 2.0 ND 33 ND 1/20/94 290 ND 4.0 ND 5.0 ND 5.7 ND 75 ND MRL 20 10 to 15 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 3.0 to 6.0 3.0 Notes: TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons _ ppmv = Parts per million by volume MRL = Minimum reporting level Doc #PX29901 W. I. 20 Pr~xair, Inc. 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, Califo Table 4. Summary of Vapor Extraction System Field Monitoring Results FID Concentration (ppmv) Date Prior to F'dters Between F'dters After l~dters 12/9/93 190 0 0 12/10/93 190 0 0 12/13/93 180 0 0 12/14/93 175 0 0 12/15/93 170 0 0 12/21/93 21 0 0 1/4/94 77 0 0 1/20/94 73 0 0 2/1/94 67 0 0 3/1/94 50 0 0 Table Notes: FID = Flame ionization detector calibrated to methane ppmv = Pans per million by volume Doc #PX29901W. 1 SITE LOCATION, .~._..,. Fruitrale J '"' :1 ~ ' '"'" - ~_ 'i i I' [] . Cross SOURCE: TRIPLE A MAP OF BAKERSFIELDi CALIFORNIA AREA ]~ O' 2,000' COUPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FI(~JRE  PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT UNGR. P.S. TITLE: ROUX ASS~IATES DATE: 06/93 1 ~w,,,~Lm~',~ ,co,',~s~ !SCALE: AS SHOWN SITE LOCATION ,, ~z~,,w' PROJECT NO. 29901W FILE NAUE: PATOPO-1 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK I I j ¢.w-8 L__ EXPLANATION' I ~ ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ' I ,.~-~ I ~ I , ~w-~ ,~w-, I MISSING . I STORAO[ O' I TANK 20' 40', COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR F~RE PREPPED BY: R.P.  PR~ECT UNGR. P.S. FITLE: ~ 0~3 SITE PLAN 2 RO~ ASSOCIATES S~E: AS SHOWN * ~ PROJEOT NO. FiLE ~ME: PAR601 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA j // 'X%~' ~%, MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK 72.7_/ / · / "~-'*/ ~"~'-'" / I m 75.26 i I EXPLANATION' .~ ~W-I ~O~IrORING WELL LOCATION AND ~ESIGNAIION / ~ I .,w-~ 73.30 GROUND WATER EL~ATIONS I ~ 72.95 /< ~ I~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)I ~ ~ I ,~w-~ .,w-, I MISSING ' 73.30 I SIOR~G[ I TANK 20' 40' I APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 Complied by P.S. Prepared For: PRAXAtR FIGURE Prepared by V.W.S. Pro~ect Mgr: P.S. Title: Date: 3/,4 ELEVAIION OF GROUND WATER ~oux ~ssoaa,[s ~uc. sco~e: S~ow~ M~RCH 1, 1~4 Environmental Consulting ~ Revision: 1 Pro~ect No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. File No: 2990003 J I . j 82/ND MW-3 J -~- BW-7 .ND/ND I ,- _ _ ~ Mw-4 I I~,- I 0 ~: ~-- EXPLANATION' o I '"w-8--e- ""- ~ ND/ND ~t~-k, JW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DF'SI(;NATION J L.,.J J ~ MW-5 82/ND CONCENTRATION OF TPH-G/BENZENE J ND/ND ND NOT DETECTED. FOR DETECTION LIMITS ~J SEE ATTACHED LABORATORY REPORTS J I ~ ,,w-6 -~,,w-, I I ~ I I I LPG J STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' J Compiled by:. P.S. Prepared For: PRAXAIR FIGURE Prepared by:. V.W.S. Project Mgr: P.S. Title: Date: 3/9,~ CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPt'I-G)/BENZENE 4 ROUX ASSOCIATES INC. Scale: SHOWN IN GROUND WATER, MARCH 1, 1994 £nvfronmentol Consulting Revision: 1 & Proiect No. 29901W PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA File No: 2990004 Figure 5: Total Product Recovered Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California 25 "5 20 E ~-~ 15 0v o> 10 0 I I I I I I 12/9/93 12/23/93 1/6/94 1/20/94 2/3/94 2/17/94 3/3/94 Date Rle PX29901W. 2. 10 GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: _~C~ C~O I (~ WELL ID: ~ ~ ~L CASING DIAMETER (inches): 3 4 6 8 12 Other GAB.ON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other f ~dTu~,.. j TO3~..;LS-oTW;I.~.V0X u.~..~ ~---~ =~ · . DATE PURGED: $-1-? q START (2400 HO END (2400 H0 DATE SAMPLED: $-1-~5/ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 HO , TIME VOLUME pH E.G. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (~400 I-ir} (gaJ.) (units) (p_rnt~os/cm @ 25° C) gl=) (visuaJ) (visual) 1.5 9.3~ ,3¢ -7~. ¢ ~,~ ,3,0 "g, ag · 3~- 7/. ~ l~t~ FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump _~. Bailer Creflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer 0'effort®) Centrifuga~ Pump Bailer (PVC) ~ DOL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump ~ Bailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated Bailer Oisposable Dedicated Other:. Othe~ REMARKS: PAGE J OF [ SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ... ~ c~ ~ O(~) WELL ID: ~ I~ ~ CUENT/STATION #: ~'~,t" / ~3h~(,CW&'~I~ ADDRESS: CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other I ACTUAL DATE PURGED: ~:)"~ -~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~-I -~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (24o0 H~) (ga.) (un,s) (~ntms/cm @ 25' C) CF') (,~sua) (visu~ '~. 5 '7. e'a ,57 "73, ,/ 5. o '7, ~G .5/,~ -72.7 '7.5 G.0o~, .35 -'/,2. / FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS VVELL (i.e. FB-1. XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ~ 2' Bladder Pump .~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) C, entrifugaJ Pump Bailer (PVC) OOL Sampler ~ Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper ~ Submem~le Pump ~ Dedicated Bailer Disposable Dedicated )ther. Other;. ~EMARKS: 'AGE I OF I , SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECTNO: 2q<~OI/~ WELLID: H(A.~ ~ ! CASING DIAMETER (inches): j~ 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/~N EAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other IAcTuAL I DATE PURGED: Oo-I- ~ ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: TIME VOLUME pH F_C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 ~) (ga.) (un,s) (~ntms/cm 2.5 FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1. XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ~' Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~' Baler (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) OOL Sampler __ Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submem~le Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper __ Submem~le Pump Dedicated Ba~er Disposable Oedicated Other:. :[EMARKS: 'AGE ! OF ~ SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ WELL ID: /~ ~,~' CASING DIAMETER (inches): O 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other T~ L/,~.~ -DWV ~.S?X ..~. . ,~ =~.~ DATE PURGED: ~ 'l '¢~ ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ -(-?~ START (2400 Hr) ENO (2400 Hr) i..~;00 TIME VOLUME pH F__C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIOITY ¢4oo H~) (g~U.) (un,s) (~m~os/c~n @ 25° C) CF) (visual) (visuaO 2.5 ~/.oo~ · G:~ '7 f. 2, ~ ~,~ FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS.WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT .., 2' Bladder' Pump ~' Bailer (Teflon®) ~ 2' Bladder Pump ~,~ Bailer (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) ~ DOL Sampler Baile¢ (Stainless Steel) I I Submemible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Dippe~ ~ Submem~le Pump Dedicated ~ Bailer Disposable Dedicated Othec. Othec o REMARKS: ~AGE I OF [ SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: '~C~ ~ 0 ! f~ WELL ID: {~ {~ '7 CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other C.,AU.ON ,.7 X C~S~NG C~.O.tA~'O IACTUAL I TQ ~,~,3,5 -DTW ~.O$ X ~.. ~ G = ~ I~' Pon~E IS DATE PURGED: '~O ° I - ~"/ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: 3 -( -~,z/ START (2400 Hr) ENO (2400 Hr} ~ TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIOITY (24oo Hr) (ga.) (un,s) (~rn~/cm @ 25' C) CF) (v~su~) (~suaQ $ '7//¢ I.~ 7'/.3 ¢~=~ ~ t o 7.._~¢ · ~7 72, G k+ ~ ~o~ FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' 81adder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~' Baile~ (Teflon®) Centrifugai Pump Ba~ler (PVC) OOL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump ~ Bailer (~ Steel) Dipper Submers~le Pump Dedicated Sailer Disposable Dedicated Other:. Othec. REMARKS: :AGE [ OF ( SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: '~,~ ~ O[ k~ WELL ID: ~J~ k~ ~ CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other J ACTUAL J DATE PURGED: ._~.( .(~,~/Z START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) OATE SAMPLED: ~, - ( - ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) J/'/,'O ~5 TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (~4oo Hr) (gaJ.) (un,s) (~mos/cm @ 25° C) CF) (v~su~u) (visua0 FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT z' 81adder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) __ 2' Bladder Pump ~ g~'l~ (Teflon®) CentrifugaJ Pump Bailer (PVC) OOL Sampler __ Baile~ (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump __ Bailer (Stminless Stee{) Dipper Submersible Pump Oedicated Bailer Oisposa~le Dedicated ~,her: Other. :~MARKS: PRINT NAME: :AGE f OF I SIGNATURE: Sequoia ' 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233 1900 Bate~ Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689 .anatyrlcat $..-,-.m.,,to. CA,,,,,,:,-,6o0 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrix: Water Received: Mar 2, 1994iiiii Concord, CA 04~20 ^nalysis Method: EPA 5030/8015/8020 Reported: Mar '15, 1994!ii!! Attention: Paul Supple. Flrst Sample #: 403-0313 TOTAl.. PURGE~BLI= pI=TROU=UM HYDROCARBONS with BTI=X DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. pg/L 403-0313 403-0314 403-0315 403-0316 403-0317 403-0318 29901-MVV1 29901-MW5 29901-MVV8 29901-MVV4 29901-MW7 29901-MW3 Purgeable Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 82 Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 1.7 Chromatogram Pattern: .......... Unidentified Hydrocarbons > C8 Quality Control Data Report Limit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 Instrument Identification: ML2 ML2 ML2 ML2 ML2 ML2 Surrogate Recovery, %: 97 90 90 100 97 90 (QC Limits = 70-130%) Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit. SEQUOIA ~.~¢'rlCAL _.~ Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4030313.ROU < 1> I~ Bat~ Avenue, ~ite L Conco~, ~ 94520 (510) 686-9~ F~ (SI0) 686-9689 I 1~ 1 ~na~lcat 8,gSt~kerAvenue,~ite8 ~ac~me.to,~ 958~4 (916) 92l-9~ F~(916) 921-01~ i~!~'RS~ociates Client Project 10: Praxair,'~'~'W ................. 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Matrix: Liquid Concord, CA 94520 Attention: Paul Supple QC Sample Group: 4030313-8 Reported: Mar 15, 19947;ii QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT ANALYTE Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes Benzene Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: M.N. M.N. M.N. M.N. MS/MSD Batch#: 4030317 4030317 4030317 4030317 Date Prepared: 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 Date Analyzed: 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 Instrument I.D.#: ML2 ML2 ML2 ML2 Conc. Spiked: 20 t. zg/L 20/Jg/L 20/~g/L 60 pg/L Matrix Spike % Recovery: 80 90 100 97 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery: 75 85 95 90 Relative % Difference: 6.5 5.7 5.1 7.5 LCS Batch#: LCS031494 LCS031494 LCS031494 LCS031494 Date Prepared: 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 Date Analyzed: 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 3/14/94 Instrument I.D.#: ML2 ML2 ML2 ML2 LCS % Recovery: 70 80 85 85 % Recovery I Control Limits: 71-133 72-128 72-130 71-120 I Please Note: ~ preparation, and analytical methods ;mployed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents, I fortifie~ with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If [~.~..~ ~the recovery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix I interference, the LCS recover7 is to be used to validate the batch. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 4030313.ROU <2> ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY N..q 00541.' Ground-Water Consultants ' // ANALYSES PAGE,,, !'OF PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION COLLECTED COLLECT[~ ~ , , SAMPLER'S DATE TIME S~L RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE ~ME SEAL RELINQUISHED BY: (SI~A~URE) FOR ~TACT RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME S~L RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE INTAC~ I~ACT Y OR N Y OR N RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME SEAL RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE INTACT I~A~ Y OR N Y OR N ANAL~ICAL ~ORATORY REC~i~ED DEC 2 Et ~3 AnalyCioal & Oonsulting Services Roux Associates Laboratory No: 38158-1 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Recieved: 12-9~93 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 12-20-93 Attention: Rick Riedel , Sample: Gas Sample Description: Inlet Vent Scrubber Sampled by Tim Mason of Zalco Laboratories on 12-9-93 PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < 2.0 2.0 Toluene < 2.0 2.0 Ethyl Benzene < 2.0 2.0 Xylenes 56 6.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 350 20 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 350 20 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 12-17-93 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 (805) 3~5-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069 '(~ ZALCO OFIATOFIIES. ~NO.I~I Analyti~l & Consulting Services , . Roux Associates Laboratory Ho: 38158-2 ]855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Recieved: ]2-9-93 Concord, CA 94520 Oate Reported: Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: Outlet After Scrubber Sampled by Tim Mason' of Zalco Laboratories on 12-9-93 PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < 1.0 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 1.0 Xylenes < 3.0 3.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons < 10 10 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons < 10 10 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 12-17-93 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level - /~iim Etherton Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw . 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield. California 93308 (805) 3~95-O539 FAX (805) 395-3069 .... i Rm lVEDDEC2919§3 ZALCO,I- BORATORIES,INO'' Analytioal&Consu ingServioes Roux Associates Laborato~ No: 38]68 ]855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: ]2-]0-93 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: ]2-20-93 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38168-! Inlet Vent Scrubber 38168-2 Outlet After Scrubber Sampled by Tim Mason of Zalco Laboratories on 12-10-93 at 1400 hours -1 -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < 1.0 < ].0 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 < 1.0· 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Xylenes 53 < 3.0 3.0 PPMV PPMV Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 310 < 10 10 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 310 < 10 10 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 12-17-93 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level ~' Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw ~ 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 (805) 3~E)5-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069 Roux Associates La~rato~ No: 38188 185S ~at~ Blvd., Sutte 770 Oate Receive: Attention: Rtck Rl~el S~ple~ Sample ~scrJptton: 38~88-~ Znlet to Vent ~bber Sailed ~ R~ehard gtlsen of Za]ce LabaratorJes on ~-~3-g3 f~ ]430 ~ ~5~5 hours -! -2 . PPHV PPMV RRL Volatile A~omatJc ILvd~ocarbons genzene < t.O < 1.O Toluene e 1.0 < ].0 £t~1 Benzene < 1.0 < ~.0 I,O X~lene~ 73 < 3,0 3,0 Tot~l Petroleum H~droc~rbons 470 46 ~0 Non-Hethane Hydrocarbons 470 46 ZO ~e~h0d: EPA S020 Ilate Analyzed: 12-]7-93 ~L ~ Hintmum Reportlng Level ~.-/-Lab 0pet'at.'i~ns Hanage~ Jr/,:cw Ar'rnour'. Avenue E~eke, ..~rield, C~liFc~nla ~C)tD. ..~ ZALO0 '~/~ORATORIES, INL~. Analycioal ~, ~nsulcing Servioes ,, ~ Roux Associates Laborato~ Ho: 38204 ]835 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 12-14-93 Concord, CA 94520 Oate Repo~ted: 12-23-93 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38204-] Inlet To Vent Scrubber 38204-2 Outlet From. Scrubber Sampled by Richard ~ilson of Zalco Laboratories on 12-14-93 from 1500 to 1545 hours -1 -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Xylenes 57 < 3.0 3.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 440 < 10 10 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 440 < 10 10 Method: EPA 8020 Date analyzed: 12-17-93 MRL = Minimum Reportin9 Level Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw ~ 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 · (805) ~95-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069 REC~ED DEC 2 9 19,93 Analytical ~. Consuming Services Roux Associates Labor~tory Ho: 38223 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 12-15-93 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 12-23-93 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38223-1 Inlet to Vent Scrubber 38223-2 Outlet from Vent Scrubber Sampled by Richard Wilson of Zalco Laboratories on 12-15-93 from 1430 to 1530 hours -1 -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Xylenes 24 < 3.0 3.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 130 < 10 10 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 130 < 10 10 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 12-17-93 JE/ccw 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield. California 93308, (805) ;3~95-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069  lycioal ~, C It g Ama onso tn . , Roux Associates Laboratory No: 38272 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 12-21-93 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 12-28-93 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38272-1 System 1 Inlet , 38272-2 System 2 Outlet Sampled by Glen White on 12-21-93 at 1330 hours -! -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene 2.48 < 1.0 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Xylenes 27.1 < 3.0 3.0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 160 < 10 10 Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 159 < 10 10 Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 12-28-93 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level ~Jim Etherton /~ Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw 4309Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California93308 (805) 395-0539 FAX(805) 395-3069 ZALCO ~IOR~ATORIES  ly g ~; INO. Ara Cioal ~, Oonsultin ervioes Roux Associates Laboratory No: 38350 1855 Gateway Blvd., #770 Date Received: 1-4-94 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 1-19-94 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38350-1 S2 Between Carbon; Sampled at 1240 hours 38350-2 S1 Inlet; Sampled at 1250 hours Sampled by Glen White on 1-4-94 -1 -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene < i.0 < 1.0 1..0 Toluene < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 Ethyl Benzene < 1.0 2.0 1.0 Xylenes < 3.0 33 3.0 Total Hydrocarbons < 15 66 15 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons < 15 66 15 MRL =~Minimum Reporting Level Method: EPA 8020 Date Analyzed: 1-14-94 JE/ccw' L 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield. California 93308 (805) 395-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069 ZALCO BORATORIEs. IN . RECEIVED Analytical&Consulting Services Roux Associates Laborato~ No: 38506 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 770 Date Received: 1-20-94 Concord, CA 94520 Date Reported: 1-28-94 Attention: Rick Riedel Sample: Gas Sample Description: 38506-1 S-1 Inlet; Sampled at 1435 hours 38506-2 S-2 Between Carbon; Sampled at 1425 hours Sampled by Glen White on 1-20-94 -1 -2 PPMV PPMV MRL Volatile Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene 4.0 < 2.5 2.5 Toluene 5.0 < 2.5 2.5 Ethyl Benzene 5.7 < 2.5 2.5 Xylenes 75 < 7.5 7.5 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 290 < 15 15 Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 220 < 15 15 Method: EPA 8020 Date ~nalyzed: 1-26-94 MRL = Minimum Reporting Level ~/ ' Lab Operations Manager JE/ccw ~ 4309 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 (805) 395-0539 FAX (805) 395-3069 Uriah lnc An Enutronmental Services Compan~ FAX PAX ~0..' _ TELEPHONE NO.: .(//J--'-:., ,..~-/~--j~- ~/~"~'/ NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING TME COVER IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, OR IF NOT ALL PAGES OF THIS FAX HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, PLEAS~ CONTAOT US AT THE ABOVE T~LEPHONE NUMBER. . Io~_~ ~---~ I I-o ~-' ~- i / ! ',~ · , ~:"~;'., /~ " ~ " ~- ; ............... ~ , ., = , / I .... Ba~er~ Weldin~ Supp]~ T T- ' ] ~ - ' ~oject Number: 13lgO~ I ) ~ 1 ~ R / ~ ~ RESOURCE II d AGF. AGENCY I~ALL I.. ABlio,'rT ~ HtCaU.~.v, ~ ~ DMECTOR ~ nn,k. ~ J~.m DAVID I~ W ~ ~' IDMS, nJ"CO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICF. DEF&R I-J/!2AIqDOUS MKJ'L~qlAI. B APPUOATION FOR A PEHMIT TO MANAC~M;m' Pl~OC~RAM (ClROLE ONE) - CONSTFi~, RECONSTRUCT, MONITORING WELL APt~Ui~ATIC)N DF.~N OR DIOTROy A W~LL ~PPLI:CAtI~J! ADD~ISS WOIIK PHOII DATE iTAIITINO OATE /~ ~'.7.~,/' - DEPTH TO GIIOUN~WATER & FLOW 'DIR~¢TIOli PERFORMED BY: "9Fr~. JOB SITE: OIKCTIONS TO WELL SITE'. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT: which an ine~n 18 mqut~ ~lm Inl~lon i ~ or ~mpl~, pt~mem ~ ~ ~ ~ plug~ S. C~u~ un~r t~$ Per~ W 8~ to a~ Ifl~~ ~ oe~m mppm, 6. A~ misrepmaa~ ar ~naompllln~ ~ ~ui~ P~ ~na~lons or ~l~e wi ~ in ~e ~ ~ ~p W~,Omer,' ~ me E~tronme~ He~ ~e~a De--em wa~n 14 d~ ~ ~m~ ~ ~ ~ Uriah Inc. An Environrner tai .q~r~ic'~,~ t~f,_~.,.~ June 24, 1991 '-'~'~'~ ....'~"~?~'~ Environmental Health Services Dept. 2700 M Street 3rd Floor Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Attention: Mr. Brian Pitts Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed please find application for permit, previously faxed to and approved by Ms. Dolores Gough together with check in the amount of $700.00 representing fee of $350.00 each for two Monitoring Wells to be installed at above referenced location. Wells are scheduled to be installed June 27, and JUne 28th, 1991. Please fax permit to Uriah, Inc. 415 455 4995. Thank you for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours Be~enice Rapp Business Manager 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AG.-NCY  ~irorm~mtal ~h ~ ~nt ~D~ L. ~BO~ ~ Mctel ' ~, ~S, D~CTOR D~ECTOR DAV~ P~CE · ~ J. ~DDY, ~O ~T~ D~R ~ ~, ~CP, D~OR RONM T SER CES DEPONENT H~RDOUS ~R~ PERMff ~: MW 6~5 MANAGEMENT PRO~M MW MONffORIN~ WE~(8) PERMIT OWNER'S NAME: Bakers Weldinq and Supply DATE: June 18, 1991 FACILITY NAME: Bakers Weldincj and Supply FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auqer CONTRACTOR: Melton Drillinq MCENSE NO.: C 57 / 50827 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Uriah TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S). Groundwater NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: Two (2) at this time. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2.Other required Inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs, 4.Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 5. All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where degradation may occur must be destroyed after 2 years or prove no degradation is occurring or has occurred. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses, must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of Issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth approximately 32'. This permit must be signed by either the contractor or owner. OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE PERMIT APPROVED BY: Brian Pitts, Hazardous Materials Specialist BP: cas \655-05. mw 2700 ".M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 HAZARDOUS MATEFIIAL8 APPUCATION FOR A PERMIT TO one CON6TRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, MONITORING WELL APPUCATION DF:F. PEN OR DES'TROY A WEll fEE' PA~D TI8 6,)(') NO (') STARTING OATE ~,",,~ ~'.~'.~,~:?,::F,~ ON APPROVED LIST ( ) YES (,) NO PROPOSED ' ADDRESS ~/g ~' Y~/~,y/~q~/y' 7I~A/~. PHONE NO. ' COMPLETION DATE ~/~/~/g~,~/~,g' , ~.~ ~.~--~"~ ON APPROVED LIST {y) YES ( ) NO DEFTH TO GROU#OWATER & FLO~ DIRECTION ~ERFORMED eY: (~[~'~/d//~ Y-~/~'J;r/~/,7/~/~'~_F~ REGISTRATION ~: JOB SITE: T R , SEC. 40-ACRE SU~,..~ GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT: 1. Permit applications mu.~ 13~ eubmiffecl to file ~F~vironmental Health Sen/ices Deoa~trnen~ at I~ast lO workina clays odor to the prqpqsecl ~tantnq dae. 2. Well site approval is requirecl before beginning any work relatecl to well constru~ion. It is unlawful to continue work past the atage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or comDlatecl. 3. /.Other required inspections include: concluctor, casing, ail annular seals, ancl final construction features. 4. ,/ A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the. clay that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 5. Construction uncler this Permit is subject to any instructions by Depalment representatives. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with requirecl Permit Conclitions or Ordinance will result in lasuance of a '~top Work Orcler.' 7. A copy of the Department of Water Rasoumes Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs ancl water quality analyses, must be submitted to the Environmental Health Sen/ices Deparlment within 14 clays after complation of the work. 8. A well cisstruction application must be flied with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calanclar day after clate of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress towarcl completion macle. Fees are not retunclable nor transferable. 10. I .13ave re__Rcl_~tg-a~ee to comply with the General Con/clitions nctecl above.. OWNER'S SIGNATURE ' / OATE CONTRACTOR ' ~/S I GNATURE ~/' DATE APPLICATION APPROVED BY: ,,,//~' '- :-:"':,: '-C'*'':=''~- ( DATE: (a-monit o. app) FACILITY PLOT PLAN - Provide a description of the facility to be monitored, Ln¢lu~e location of tanks, proposed monitorin~ and placement, nearest street or intersection, location of any water wells or surface waters within a 500' radius of facility. Please attach. WELL DIMENSIONS - Provide a dec-ileal drawing of well(s). Include: depth of well, casing length, screen/filter pack length, arglular sealants, and well cap. Note any irregularities. Please attach. ZONE OF INFLUENCE - Provide mathematical calculations that detezmine the zone of FOR VADOSE ZONE W~.r-q influence for the soil at each site taking into account the monitoring method being used. Please attach. NOTE: If this application is not complete it trill be retuzned. AEG: cd: formtool \monitor Main Building  Loading Dock 60.65 ,,=..,.°""'-' Monitoring Well Placements On J , I. oE~l '~(~-~-General Direction Of This Site Map Are Based On The Groundwater Flow. Southwest Corner Of Main Building JD (See Site Notes).  X~o.5o . SITE NOTES: i 60.19 ~60.30 U~-l Site Survey Completed And .Ground Water klw-6 Gradient Determined On 11/28/90 By (DRY) Uriah, Inc. Monitoring Well Positions 60.19 For This Site Map Were Determined By A Cartesian Coordinate System With The Origin At The Southwest Corner Of The Main Building. LPG ~ Monitorin~ Well STORAGE 0 Proposed Groundwater Well Location TANK ~ Scale: i I I ~ 1" =20' / ' Bakers'e]ding Sul:)P]Y ' A~n E~nv!r~~ ~e~~ J Project Number: 12190WF J ' J 3505Pierce Road J ' ' ! Bakersfield, CA I tal Company R E C E I P T PAGE 1 02/20/92 Invoice Nbr. 1 67435' 12:46 am KERN CO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY 2?00 'M' Street Bakers'field, CA 93301 Type of Order W (805) 861-3502 CASH REGISTER URZAH ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. Customer P.O.~ I Wtn By IOrder Date I Ship Date I Via I Terms I GLC I 02/20/92 I 02/20/92 IOF I NT I I I I I Line Description Quantity Price Unit Disc Total 1 4751 WELLS MONITORING 2 335.00 E 670.00 WLL003B Order Total 670.00 Amount Due 670.00 Payment Made By Check 670.00 THANK YOU! R E C E ! P T PAGE 1 I 02/20/92 [n¥ot~e Nbr. I 67435 I 12:46 em KERN CO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY (805) a61-3502 I CASH REGISTER UR[AH ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. ! I I GLC ) 02/20/92 I 02/20/92 IDF I NT Line Demcription Quantity Price Unit Dlsc Total 1 4751 WELLS MONITORING 2 3~5.00 E 670.00 WLL003B Order To~a"l $?0.00 Amount Due 670.00 Payment Made ~y Check 570.00 THANK YOU! Uriah lnc An Enulronmental Serulce~ Company FAX TO: SUBJECT: iF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, O1~ IF NOT ALL PAGES OF TBZS FAX HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, PLEASE CONTACT US AT THE ABOVE TELEPHONE NUMBER. DAVID PlUCZ JU WqJJAN ,L ~. AKO ENV~O~~ HEALTH SEIWZC~S DEPARTNENT MON~Q ~ A~U~A~O~ D~ O~ D~~ A WE~ DATE ~ APP~~ C~PL[TION ~T1 O~ APPKVED LILT: ~ YIS '~ ) NC OI~[CTION~ T0 ~LL ~T[: GENERAl. CONDmON~ OF THF. PERMIT:, I. Permit applications ml.lt t~e_lubrfll~el m ~,ll.a .r~d!~nll'nemal Health to me E~~ He~ 8e~e P~em ~ 14 ~ ~ I Main Building I (~ Looding Dock Im~.m~m ~ ~un~ater F~w. ~w~ Coragr Of Main Bulldl~  . ~.~ . ~.~ ~ 8II~ ~O~S. H~ey ~mmle~d And Ground Wa~ [ ~ ~ ~e h~~ ~~ ~0~ 0 ~o~4 Oro~~ W~I J ~ t Senle. _ t. , ............... t"=20:, / , Bnkers ~elding Supply . U ri ah In g~Ofi Pierce Road Bakersfield, ~ ~n gnvironment~ 8e~ee~ Compan7 '' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICERS DEPARTMENT SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM ' 0 Date '-"__ 7 Time: Reporting Person Address Phone ~roperty Owner ...................... .a ..................... Address Phone .... ~_:_ ~__.~...~~ ....... ~: ...... C(~molainant notified of results ......................... Investigated Dy .............................................................................. Date Environmental Health 580 4],:13 2029 (Rev. (em) INTENDED USE:.~MESTIC/PRIVATE ~ (1 Conn~tion) CON~UC~80~ ME~OO: ROTARY~r-~¢C:' '~- ' :~J' - ooM~TIc/NoNPUBLIC ~ (24Conno~lon,) "' '.'~S~E ~OOL' :..' ~' SEALINO MATERIAL (CHECK ONE) GRAVEL PACK (CHECK ONE) PROP0~ED CA~I~ ' , : NEAT CEMENT ~ ' ' "' ' YES ~ NO ~ DIAMETER TYPE OTHER " ." ~''~ '; ~'' ' ' L' ' ~R~ED WELL DEPTH:-' .... '.-.;.-~:~-~'2PROP~ED PERFORATIONS O'R ~flEEH -PROPPED sEAE~PLUG($) .... ~.~",,-~ · GENERAL' CONDITIONS: . , : .,.~"~ . , -' - . " ** ~/~ ., '* ' ':. · '-.,-' · '"'.' . '· :::. 'i:,;. :'·: ' "'"--%..?."'., . " ' ': !;.. :il~e' r/~, tt :~p~,!!~lon~,' m~ ~:sub~:~,~l_., to. t, he:'~anning ,D,~!~;,~? zgning ,:.~.s,~.a~fl,.0od plane <=leamnces prior 3.: Well si~ ~provat is r~ulr~ ~om beginning any ~lat~o we~ construction, ~ is ~Jt to continue workp~t ~e. ~e ~w~ch ~..l~n ~_m~ unl~ ins~on ts wa~d or compie~d.~ ;~ 4. ~r .r~tr~-i~ons i.n~u~: ~ffing ~o~duC~r.c~lng, E~gs,. att =nnul~ seals, and final con.ruction 5. ::'. In a~em a wMl ~~mom~n oneaqUifer, ~d 0ne or mom'~ ~e a~ ~n~tns~rq.~l~Y wa~r, ~ ~:~g, ..... , ~11 ~ ~ul~ to ~e the.io~fl~ of ~e ~nflnlng ~a~ .'-:~~tofany~orplu~S/ .' . , : ~ ' . '.' . ....8: ~ cfi n Under this ~J~ ons,b n~ t . . . . . .... ~ . ~ . ,~., ~ , ~ ~ '7~'~;? ~ ~ .,, ~y m!smp~en~flon :or. no~~' ~p~_.~p~[q~j~p~ ~,~ qrA~~li'Y~t In {~ =f~ ,,...~ ::~... , ; -,-.,,/.'_... ,.., ,. l~_,,_A:~py~,~pa~[,W~,R~u~~. ilers.:~e~.~ll.~s;~pl~e~.E~L~_~n~rqual~an~e~~,- ' . ' :' ,',- '-aUbmiffed:t0 ~e Heal~.,Depa~ment?ffiin-~ day~.affer Completi0n:of.the ~:'. ". ' '- .' . :' '.::,':; :': . : · '.' 11. D~. hol~ mu~ be:pro,dy d~tro~ith~ ~o (2) w~s of dHtling: A ~d~m~ion,ap~i~onm.~ ~e"~ wR~ ~. . ~pa~ment." . .. :. ::,. ,,;:'::,..:-. ;,-:..'.:.; .....- ....:-. :' :.,-, .:. ~.: . ': .:-'~ ..- ~ ,' ~, ,- ...--_- ,;... 12. ~e ~rm~t is ~oid'°~ the ninetieth"(~* ~l'~ndar day a,er dat~ of i~uan~:'if Workhas n~,~~ ~ed ~d 13. ~e Job Card shali' be ~' and remain:~t tE~Well, si~,avaiiable forthe in iD t~'°ff:.-' ":':, '~-~; ?, --,~.--' ' 14. Lead pipe'~hall not be used in constructi0'h of any private o~ public wate~.~upply'system.'.'; ' . * · .*: - ' ' 15:"'Th~';~-6f~'61~fl'~i~-~e"th~-n"~rl~qea¢l~if~d ~t~ble water sysmm:,~o~ ~ce~'~":z~: ~J~'~'~'~.. t~c~;~ 0"~, ~'" · ~T~~Z~" :~ 16. I haVe"read an~ ag~omply with the General Conditio~snote~abov~.~t... -~ja~t~.~ .' FOR OFFICIAL U~E ONLY ' ': '"' '-.":':' "' ''~ ' ' ZONING KERN COUNTY H[~LTH DEPARTMENT ' ' ZONE ........ :~,~ [ COnDITIOnS OF PERMIT OR R'~S 'OROE~IAL:t~ .~ :"-'?':NO'-':~ E-LOG REGUIRED: YES ~ ~O .-~ .. .. TUO~4~l.;:F3. . ACcEsS A~ROVAL:' YES FLOOD P~IN APPROVAL ~Ea0]~':' ~'ES' ~ _ ~O/ ~ ....:.aS~%.~E 9E~JRED= ~'~ ' DISAPPROVED BY DA~E~ ~~ ~J'~ ' ~ ' ' ' ' ' ,~:<q TOTALFEE~ ' 'PAIDON ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ' . .... -.~ ', .' : FEE RECEIV'ED BY [~ .' · , .: ::' .~' .". '... DATE:: ' .... Health 580 4~3 ~ EH (Rev. 5/87) (~. 2 of 3) ":" ' '.'"' ,~:" ~ ." "/ '"' KERN- ALTH' DE~.AR : LOCATION i A,' INDICATE BELOW THE EXACT LOCATION OF WELl., WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING -ITEMS: PROPERTY ~ .. .~'.-~ UNES, WATER BOD1E8 OR WATER COURSES, DRAINAGE PATTERN, ROAD~, EXII;TING WELLS, SEWERS AND ~ PRIVATE SEWAGF DISF~L: SYSTEMS, IN~.UDE DIMENSIONS. ..... '. .: : ..'".: : ':'.~--::. ..... -. , · . .-..:'.... ' -.: .. .>_, - ,:. B. LOCATION OF WELL IN SECTION LINES. LOCATE WELL 5Y MEASURING FROM PROPOSED WELL SITE TO TWO (2)SEC- . TION LINES OR ¼ SECTION IF A ROAD(S)BORDERS THE LAND. THE MEASUREMENT(S)SHOULD ALSO BE ~ADE FROM THE CENTER OF THE ROAD. Health 580 4~3 306EH (Rev.$/87) (Pg. 3of3) Baker's Weldin~ and Supply ~F~]~.~%'~.: none ~i~_.:Proposed L~$~j~q~]: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield ~)~4L.k.~_~ .~rl~: KAI ~ 6~_4~1~: 50 ~.l&~l~l~: ~'l I ~P~ ~ X mil J ~[ I~?: Monitorin. g ~/Z~,~L..~: Diversified well head tamper resistent w/surface seal ,. ~_~ 4" butterfly cap w/gasket and lock. ~ 50 ft. .. ~L~L.~I~: ~hedule 40~ 2" PV~ blank L> 15 ft. ~5 35 ft. ~ R in, ~L~J~ ~-~'~ 6 sack sand-cement ~ § i~, slurry with 3% bentonite Bentonite (3/8" pellets) ~q~JL..Estimated at 20 ft. ~F_~ )~JF~_j~,L~: Schedule 40, 2" PVC 0.020 slots U1tI~g INC. An ~nvi~onmen~ Serv~$ Comp&ny TELECOPIER MF.,~,~AGli PI.EA$E TI~N6MIT THE FOLLOWINQ ME6$AGE AUTHORIZED tlIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SEQUENCE NO. DATE I TIME NUMBER OF PAGE8 INCLUDING COVER PAGE; GARY J. WICKS ~. 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 Telephone (805) 86%3636 STEVE McCALLEY Telecopler (805) 861-3429 ~.'.:to, R ESOU RCE NT AG ENCY DEPARTMENTAL MW0329-05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MW0330-05 MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT OWNER'S NAME: BAKER WELDING DATE: April 30, 1990 FACILITY NAME: Baker Welding FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger CONTRACTOR: Melton Drilling Company LICENSE #: (C-57) 508270 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Uriah Inc. TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) Groundwater NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: Three (3) GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2. Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 4. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 5. All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where degradation may occur must be destroyed after 2 years. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses, must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth 17___~'. 2. Approved Bentonite Seal Y. This permit must be signed bY either thc c°ntract°r °r °wner' ~_'._~T~_T~ ~ OWNER'S SIGNATUREJ.,/g~t,~.~ ~D~/~./~.d/--~~ f/~ .... R SSIGNA'~JRE DATE PERMIT APPROVED BY: Da~ ~t~rke~r?m~l~oas Material~Specialist DATE: April 30, 1990 DS:cas \mw0328-05 GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 -*' Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE McCALLEY ' Telecopler (805) 861-3429 ~ir~to, R ESOU RCE NT AG ENCY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMIT #: MW0328-05 MW0329-05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MW0330-05 MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT OWNER'S NAME: BAKER WELDING DATE: April 30, 1990 , FACILITY NAME: Baker Welding FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308 DR1LLING METI-IOD: l-lollow Stem Autler CONTRACTOR: Melton Drilling_Company LICENSE #: (C-57) 508270 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Uriah Inc. TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S). Groundwater NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: Three (3) GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2. Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 4. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 5. All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where degradation may occur must be destroyed after 2 years. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses, must be submitted to the l-lealth Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day slier date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 10. I have read and agree to comply wilh the General Conditions noted above. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth 17'. 2. Approved Bentonite Seal 3'. This permit must be signed by either thc contractor or owner. /tO PERMIT APPROVED BY s Maferials peeialist DATE: April 30, 1990 DS:cas \mw0328-05 Uriah Inc. An Environmental Services Compan April 19, 1990 Department of Environmental Health Services Kern County 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: Enclosed please find Environmental Health Services Application together with our check payable to your order in the amount of $1005.00. Also Enclosed please find Map of area, Geologists sketch of area and Well Details information Sheet. We will be installing three two inch Monitoring Wells at above referenced site on Tuesday May 1, 1990, and the enclosed check represents your fee of $335.00 per well. OUr plan is to be on site at 8:am. Please advise if any additional information is required. Very truly yours B~renice Rapp ~-~ ~/ Business Manager 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 {lOS} ~1-3~1 .TEVE ~CALLEY ' ' ..... ~.~ .... '. /,~;~ ~ .... ~.~. '~ 1.~ ....... DEPARTMENT OF ENVlRONMENT~ (¢IK¢L~ ~,N,6EMENT.~ROG RAM ....... ::' :. ~:'';;~'~ : , .~'-' '~ ~ '~ : ~', ?-v~; ~O~RE¢ONSTR~CT, ONITORING WELL ~/~7/9o ~,ClLITY N*~ ~a~e~ ~e~a~ HO~ PHO~ NO. PPLIC,~ION -' 'ADDRESS ' 3505 ~e~ce ~oa~ ...... ~-WORK FHONE~G.' 327-5336 ..... ~ ..:. ; "'~-.._. Sake~s~e~d~ CA ~l~1~o ' DRI~LIN~ CONTRACTOR-'- ~e~oa---9~Z~ Coapa~y ....... ;--LICENSE NO.~50~ -2-7e ROPOSED '~' ~ -.,DD~SS 7:~0~ 9o~ ~Ye~ue PHONE NO. 805-589-052~ · *RTING D*TE Sake~s~e~a, CA ~3308 ON APPROYED LIST ( ) YES ( ) NO ~1~19o :- EN.V'~:~N~NT*L ~ONTR,~TOR O~PL~TIO~ D*T~ 512190 ITHOLQGY.LO~ING REYIE~D BY: ~d-'~abe~ RE61ST~TIGN ~ ' .' ~B SI~ T E~SEC. .40 AC~G SUB. DIEE~IONS ~ ~LL Si~ ;ENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT: . Permit applications mus~ be submitted to the Health .Department at least 10 worklnf days prior to the pro_posed Well site approval is required her,ore beginn!ng, any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. A phone call to.the Department omce is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of' any seals or plugs. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department,representatives. Any. misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in lssuat~ce of a 'Stop Work Order.' /. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water.quality analyses must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the, work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in 'conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance If work has not been staffed and reasonable progress toward completion made, Fees are not refundable nor transferable, 10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted-above, ....... ,/ ~WNER'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIONAq41~RE DATE APPLICATION APPROVED BY: Irxisflng blonltorlng Well Proposed Location Of Exploratory Boring · 25 FEET ]~B-1 Flow Direction ~temined '. I URIAH INC. Bakers Welding Supply T Pm~e~fNumber: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA North 0-5 Yauit B~x ·" ' KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Env. Healtrt 580 4113 06~ (3/89) RN COUNTY HEALTH DE:OARTM"..ALT 2700 M Street i~) HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVI~,UN Leon M Hebertson, M,D. Mailing Address: 1415 Truxtun Avenue DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Bakersfield, California 93301 Vernon S. Relcherd (805) 861-3636 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AA. c~. ~- 0 ~ q ~ - O % 01~1~-0~ MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT O,NER'SNA,E: AKF__R$ cu L _7- J6 %ut PPL'd OATE: FACILITY NAME: ~2) l~~'-~ (.,,LJ~__.L~"~I'X}~-_.~ ~tO~ ~ ~L~ FACILITY LOCAT[0N: ~ 50 ~ p~ C~ ~. ~. ORILLING METHOD: HOL~O~ 5T'E~ CONTRACTOR: ~~ ~LL~ ~ LICENSE ,: TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) ~O~ ~~ ~6 ~~ ~5 T~ NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED FO MONITOR FACILITY: [)~ ~ ~ ~.~- ~ ~ DI~- GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: i. Well site aoproval is required before beginning any work related to wetl construction. It is unlawful to continue work past ~he s~age at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waivea or 2. Other 'reouired insoec~ions include: conductor casing, all annular sea)s, and final construction features. A phone call ~o the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the olacement of any seals or plugs. 4. Construction under ~his Permit is subject to any instructions by Deoartment representatives. 5. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with reouire~ Permit Conditions, or Ondinance will result in issuance of a "Stoo Work Order." 6. A cooy of the Departmen~ of Water Resources Driller's Reoort as well as cooies of logs ara water ~uaiitv analyses must De submitted to ~he Hea)~h Department within 14 days a~ter comoletion of the work. ?. A well destruction aoplication must be filed with this Oeoartment if a well is being destrovea ~hat is not in conjunction wi~h a ~est hole permit. ~. The oermit is void on ~he ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been s~arted and resonab)e progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 9. I have read and agree to com~)y with the General Conuitions no~ed above. Soecial Conditions: 1. Aporoved Annular Seal Depth ~a~ ~~ ~c~ /~, This oermit must be signed by either the contractor or owner. DISTRICT OFFICES R E C E I P T PAGE 1 11/28/89 Invoice Nbr. 1 25919 12:31 am KERN COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 2700 'M' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Type of Order N (805) a61-2615 CASH REGISTER URIAH ENVIRONMENTAL SERV Customer P,O,~ I Nth By Order Date Ship Date I Via I Terms ! !..,JD 11/28/89 11/28/89 ! I NT I I Line Description Ouantity Price Llnit Disc Total 1 3 MONITORING HELL. 1 335,00 E 335,00 170E 4 BAKERS NEI...DING AND SUPPLY Order Total 335,00 Amount Due 335.00 Payment Made 8y Check 335,00 THANK YOU! · R' E C E I P T PAGE 1 11/28/89 " [nvo'fce Nbr',. ;' 1 2,5919 !2:31 am- KERN COUNTY PLANNING ~ DEVELOPMENT 2700 'M' Street 8akers~:ffeld, CA 93301 Type of Oeder W (805) 861-2615 - CASH REGISTER URIAH ENVIRONMENTAl_ SERV LJD 11/~8/89 ~1/28/89 J NT t :~ :'4ON~TOR.~NG WELL. ~ 335,00 E 335.00 ;705 ~ BAKER:5 ~5i_OiNG AND SUPPLY O~de~ To~,~i 33~. 00 Amount Due 335.00 THANF, Uriah Inc. An Environmental Services November 21, 1989 Department of Environmental Health Services Kern County 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Attention: Mr. Dan Starky Re: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Dear Dan: Per our telephone conversation of this date, enclosed find Department of Environmental Health Services Applications Check in the amount of $335.00 representing fee for permit for installation of one monitoring well Map of area Geologists sketch of area Well Details information sheet Our intent is to install one monitoring well, and abandon one monitoring well installed by another company. Our plan is to be on site Tuesday, November 28, 1989 at 8:a.m. Very truly yours · ~ Berenice Rapp Business Manager enc. 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 GARY J, WICKS 2700 M $lr~l. Ag.flcy Olroclor Bokerufleld. CA 03301 (lOS) 861.3S02 Telephone (lOS) .--.?. '2 ~-. Telocopier (80S) n,,,,,o, RESOURCE AG EM E N T AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HEALTH SERVICES ' APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO .. (CIRCLE ONE) lVlANAG EMENT PROG RAM .- CONSTR OCT, RECONSTRUCT, DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL MONITORING WELL APPLICATION DRILLING METHOD Fill With Grout CT FEE PAID YES ( ) NO ( ) AMOUNT PAID $ 42.00 APN: 11/17/89 FACILITY NAME Bakers Welding & Supply HOME PHONE NO. - .... APPLICATION ADDRESS 3505 Pierce Road WORK PHONE NO. DAT~ Bakersfield ~ CA 11/28/89 DRILLING CONTRACTOR ~elton Drilling LICENSE NO. 508270 PROPOSED ADDRESS 7101 Downing Avenue PHONE NO. 805-589-0521 STARTING DATE Bakersfield, CA ON APPROVED LIST (~) YES ( ) NO 11/28/89 EN¥1RONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Uriah, Inc. LICENSE NO. PROPOSED ADDRESS 464 Lindbergh Avenue PHONE NO. 415-455-4991 COMPLETION DATE Livermore, CA ON APPROVED LIST ( ) YES ( ) NO LITHOLOGY LOGGING REVIEWED MY: Ed Tabbet REGISTRATION DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER & FLOW DIRECTION PERFORMED MY: Walt Floyd REGISTRATION OB SITE: T R__SEC. 40 ACRE SUB. DIRECTIONS TO WELL SIT~ GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT: 1. Permit applications musl be submitted to the Health Department at least 10 working days prior to the proposed starting date. 2. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 3. Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 4. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the clay that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 5. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 6. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a 'Stop Work Order.' 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundab~nor transferable. 10. I~have read an~ agree to comply with the General Conditions .holed abbve. 3WNER'S SIONA~E / DATE cON~RA--CTOR'S SIGNAT~ DATE // APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATE: GARY J. WICKS 2700 M (lOS) ISI*3~Z Tek~n '' Te~o~er (~) HI-~ STEVE ~CALLEY /...~:-' ~ ~ ~r. tof RESOURCE M,. 'NAGEM'ENT'* AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT~ H~ZARDOUS MATERIALS HEALTH SERVICES APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO .~ ._.. (CIRCLE ONE) ~AHAG E~E~T PROG RAM ..... ~ ..... . CO~STR UCT, RECONSTRUCT, DE~PEN OR DESTROY A WELL MONITORING WKLL APPLICATION DRILLING M~T~OD fiollo~ Seem ~u~e~ CT ~ ~ FEE PAID Y~S ( ) ~O (). A~OU~T PAID ~ ~~ 11/17/89 EACILITY ~ ~a~e~ ~e1~1~ & Suppl~ HO~ P~O~E ~O, APPLICATION ADDRESS 3~0~ ~ie~ce ~oa~ WORK P~ONE ~O. DATE fia~e~s~..iel~ ~_ C~ 11/28/89 DRILLING CONTRACTOR ~1co~ D~i111~ LZC~S~ NO. PROPOSED ADDRESS 7~01 Do~i~ ~Ye~ue P~ONE ~O. 805-~89-0~2~ STARTING DATE 5a~e:s~iel~, C~ O~ APPROVED LIST ~ YES () ~O ~/28/89 ENVIRON~TAL CO~TRACTOR ~iah~ ~c. LICENSE ~O. PROPOSED ADDRESS ~6~ ~i~e~gb ~e~ue P~O~ ~O. ~13-~-~99~ COMPLETION DATE ~iYe:mo~e; C~ ..... ON APPROVED LIST ( ) YES ( ) NO LITHOLOGY LOGGING R~YI~D BY: ~ Tabbec REGIST~TION DGP~ ~ ORO~WA~ A ~W DI~CT~ON P~O~GD BY: ~alC ~loy~ REGISTR~TiO~ OB SITE: T R__SEC. ,40 ACRE SUB. DIRECTIONS TO WELL SITE: GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT: I. Permit applications must be submitted to the Health Department at least 10 working days prior to the proposed . starting date. 2. Well site approval is retiuired before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unle~ inspection is waived or completed. 3. Otb. or required !c.-pec!io_~$ include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features` 4. A phone call to the Department offic~ is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 5. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 6. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in iss~nce of a 'Stop Work Order.' 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with Ibis Department if a well is being destroyed Ihat is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. l%es are not refun~ transferable. lO. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions/nOJed abgst6. '~WNER'S SIGNAT~I~RE- DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNAT,~I~ DATE APPLICATION APPROVED BY: DATF_.: I I I I I I Site Map Bence A='Oxygmn' storage vessel 0 40 B= Nitrogen S~orage vsssel I , j A=gon storage vessel Scale (feet) N Proposed Explo=ato~¥ Borings WELL DETAILS PROJECT NAME: Bakers Welding BORING/~.I. NO. MW-1 PR(XTECT NUMBER: CASING k~.I~VATION: WI~.T. PERMIT NO.: SURFACE ELEVATION: G-5 Vault B~x A. Total Depth: 45 ' B. Boring Diameter: 8" G Drilling method: Hollow Stem C~. Casing Length: 45 ' Material: PVC H D. Casing Diameter: 2" E. Depth to Perforations: 20' F. Perforated Length: 25 ' A Perforated Interval: 20'-45' Perforation Type: Slots Perforation Size: 0.020" I G. Surface. Seal: 0-15' Seal Material: Grout H. Seal: 15'-18' Seal Material: Bentonite I. Gravel Pack: 18'-45' Pack Material: Monterey Sand Size: #3 j J. Bottxxa Seal: ~-~ B----~ Seal Material: GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 9330~ (805) 861-3502 ., .,..-. ,~ :.: '*' -:.,. Telephone (8051 861-3636 Oirec,or R E S O U R C E ~I~'.,~.~.~'A'G I~ I~"E N T A G E N C Y DEPARTM~O~EN~ RONMENTAL , ..... ~,,~, ,- ~ ~ · HAZARDOUS MATERIALS '--~~::,~ PERMIT - MW 0162-05 0163-05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT 'OWNER'S NAME: Union Carbide DATE: October 16, 1989 FACILITY NAME: Baker's Welding and $,upp!Y FACILITY LOCATION: 3505 Pierce, Road~ Bakersfield, Califo,r,n,ia DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem CONTRACTOR: BSK & Associates LICENSE #: 490942 TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) Ground Water tsg~f.of NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: (2). Two~ wells must be placed according to requirements of 9-22-89 letter from Dolores Gough, 1- well u. pgradient, 1- we.!l down. gradient. 3ENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: tape at :. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful lo continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed, cement Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day thai work is to commence and 24 hours before the placemenl of any seals or plugs. WORK Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." aitted to All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminaled site where degradalion may occur must be destroyed after 2 years. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submitled to test hole Ibc'Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. A well destruction application must be files with this Departmenl if a well is being deslroyed Ihat is not in conjunclion wilh a lest hole ;s toward permit. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date if issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. ECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth 15_...~'. I t'/ , 'E: Oclobcr 16, 1989 ?~ 163.05 GARY J. WICKS 2700 M St,eet, Suite 300 ~ency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 . %lepho~1805) 861-3636 .. . ..%lecopier (805) 861-3429 STEVE Mc CALLEY Director RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES September 29, 1989 Sam Rohn Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94538 SUBJECT: Site Characterization Proposal for Union Carbide (Baker's Welding), 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA PERMIT #050033 Dear Mr. Rohn: This Department has reviewed Uriah's response to our concerns on the site characterization workplan for the subject site. The groundwater sampling methodology that is approved by this Department is as described in 4b #3. One monitoring well shall be placed upgradtent and the other well shall be placed downgradient. Additional borings (if necessary) can be decided on site by Uriah's staff professional with the concurrence of a representative from this Department. It is required that the existing well be sampled and analyzed for gasoline constituents. The site specific gradient must also be determined during this phase of the investigation. The workplan must be implemented within 30 days from the date of this letter. Please 1) obtain all necessary permits and 2) provide 48 hours notice prior to the commencement of work for this phase of the investigation. After all samples have been retrieved and analyzed, a report prepared per ~ern County Handbook UT-35 guidelines must be submitted to this office within 60 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Walter Floyd, Uriah Bob Turner, CVRWQCB ,<ERN COUNTY HEALTH r ARTIk 2700 M Stme~ HEALTH O~C~ ~ke~ield, ~1~1. E~IRONMENTAL HEALTH DI~: SION Le~ M He~ M.D. 1415 Truth Av~e DIRECTOR OF E~RONME~ H~ ~k~leM, CalH~nil 9~1 Vein 8. Relcha~ :ARDOUS MATERIALS APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TC .......... (-CIRCLE ONE} D~EPEN OR DESTROY A W~LL ~ITO~ING-.WE~ APPLICATION ............................. ~ 10/5/-89FACTL[TY NAKE Baker's Weldinq & ,S,~pply '-HOHE PHONE N0.-t2'O9'} ~ ADDRESS 3505 Dierce RoAd HORK ~ONENO.'~415) 455-4991 Eake~-sEield, CA /89DR~LLJNG CONTRACTOR BSK & Associates LiC~E ~0:490942 ....... Street. Rak~r~f~l~ CA q~04 PHONENO.(805) 327-0671 'TING D~TE : ~ ~VEO LIST. ~) X~ ( ~ 0/~ 8/8 9ENV[~ONKENTAL CONTRACTOR U~a~, Z~o. LICENSE '~ ADDRESS 464 Lindberq~ Avenue PH~E NO. (4] 5 ) OtO~Y tO~iN~ ~;EW~D BY: Mr. ~d~i Tabet, P.E. ~IST~A~i~ ~: 43041 CI~ON$ IOWE[t S~1~: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA ~AL CONOITIONS OF THE PERHIT: 1. Permit applications must be submitted to the Health 0epartment at least 10 worktnq days prior to the- p~,~pose-"~d's--t'~'F~n9 date. 2. Well sfte approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is lawfu] to continue work past the stage at which an tnspectten is required unless inspection is waived or-completed. 3. Other required inspections tnclude: conductor casing, all annular seals, and ffnal Construction features. 4. A phone call to the Department office 15 requiredo~themorning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 5. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives. 6. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a 'Stop Work Order.' ?. A cgpy of the 0apartment of Hater Resources Oft]leT's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this ~partment if a well is being ~estroyed that is not in con]uction with e test hole permit. 9. The permit ~s void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance ~f work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor t~sferable. l.~Z~have read end agree to comply with the General C~dit~on~'hoted above. .~..~,---~,.~;'7'I // ' " ~ O~NER'S SZG~ATURE ~' OATE /~/~//? CONTRACTOR'S SXGNATURE /~' DATE APPLICATION APPROVE0 8Y: ' 0ATE: DISTRICT OFFICES 'eflo . LemoM . Lake'--helle . Molave . RldgeereM . 8helt~ , Taft ' . WEL'L DETAILS PROJECT NAHE~ Baker's Welding & Supply*, BORII~3/W~I~ NO. 1 & 2 WELL PERMIT NO. t ........ SURFACE 0-5 Vault Box A. Total Depths. 4,5.0: , ; B. Boring Diameters 8" O ~ ~ Drillir~ method~, H?llow-Stem ,~ t%. Casing Length: 44.5 ' .. " ~ Materials Sch' 40 PVC,.pipe .... D. ~asing Diameter8 2" E. Depth to Perfora%top~ 20.0 ' . F. Perforated Lengtht ,.. 24.5 ' A  Perforated Interval s 44.5 ' - 20.0 5 ~J Perforatior~ Types Factory Slot, Perforation Size~ 0.020 ~S G. Surface Seals ,3.0,,,'-0.0' Seal Materials Cortg.,retea .... H. Sea1~6.0'-3.0' Seal Materialt B~nt~n~_a p~] ] I. Gravel Pack%45.0 ' -6.0 ' Pack Mater'lal~ Monterey Sand Slze~ ·2/12 ~ J. Bottom Seal~ . ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES~ PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELL Site Map 6' Chain Link Fence Building ~ C~ loading dock Septic ~ark ~ I~i~ ~isting~ro~d~ter ~onitoring~all and ~ ~10,000 gallon..unleaded , Ag line storage tank ~ ~ ~ LEGE~ A= Oxygen storage vessel u 40 B= Nitrogen Storage vessel C= Argon storage vessel Scale (feet) N = Proposed Exploratory Borings I J ' I ; I + I URIAH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 464 LINDBERGH AVENUE, LIVERMORE, CA 0 SITE LOCATION: Scale (Miles '" 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 // ~-~/--'~- ~, / ~ .~ ,,,~ Mr. J~ ~z ~ ~:4~}...,2' 2420 ~ino Ramon S~ R~on, C~ifomia 94583 ~~/ v QU~TE~Y GRO~ WATER MO~OR~G P~XA~ ~CATION PE~T NO. 05~33 3505 P~CE RO~, BAKE~LD, CALIFO~ D~ Mr. ~pez: This letter repo~ presents the results of qu~eHy ground water ~pling ~dorm~ by Roux Ass~iates, Inc., (Roux) on D~ember 2, 1993, at the P~r facility l~at~ at 3505 Pier~ Road, B~ersfield, C~ifomia (Site, Figure 1). BACKGRO~ The P~r facility is ]o~t~ on the west side of Pierce Road n~ the inters~tion with Way. ~e Sim is approximately %-mile no~h of the inter~fion of Highway 99 ~d Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000 t~g/L (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells have generally dropped in the last two to three years. As of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were Doc #PX29901W. 1.18 Mr. Joe Lol~z Page 2 of 3 lanuary 31, 1994 collected in June 1993 from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. Roux performed quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in September 1993. The ground water table elevation rose about 14 ft. since June 1993. Ground water samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-3 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8. Laboratory analysis of those samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were only present above method detection limits in the sample collected from MW-3. The MW-3 sample contained total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons at 87 txg/L, toluene at 1.5 txg/L, and xylenes at 12 t~g/L. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux personnel sampled six monitoring wells at the Site on December 2, 1993. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down the well. Ground water sample field data sheets are provided in the Attachments. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on December 2, 1993, is presented on Table 2. The laboratory analytical rePorts and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on December 2, 1993, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 28.90 to 30.51 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has risen about 4 ft. since September 14, 1993. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the west at a gradient of about 0.01 (Figure 3). The ground water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were not used to determine the direction of flow and gradient because these two wells are about 20 ft. deeper than wells MW-1 through MW-5. The lower relative water elevations in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated a downward component of ground water movement at the Site. LABORATORY RESULTS Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present Doc #PX29901W. 1.18 'Mr. Joe Lopez Page 3 of 3 January 31, 1994 above method detection limits. The ground water sample collected from monitoring well MW-3 contained detectable concentrations of TPH-G at 80/zg/L, toluene at 0.60/zg/L, and xylenes at 13 /zg/L. Benzene and ethylbenzene were not detected in the MW-3 sample. Table 2 summarizes the laboratory analytical data for the ground water samples. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during March 1994. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS Kern Environmental Services, of Bakersfield, California, installed the vapor extraction system at the Site during December 1993. The system was started up on December 2, 1993. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Senior Hydrogeologist Todd Ramsden, R.G. California Registered Geologist No. 5687 cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table 1 Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, December 2, 1993 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, December 2, 1993 Ground Water Sample Field Data Sheets Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Doc #PX29901W. l.18 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation ( 1 ) Water (ft) Elevation (1) MW-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 1212193 ~oo.oo ~.9o 7~.~o MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 DO 9/~4/93 96.49 33.~ 6~.Z3 12/2/93 100.07 28.98 71.09 MW-3 6/4/93 97.0~ Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 12/2/93 10039 2930 7039 MW-4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 9~.70 33.7o 63.oo 12/2/93 10039 29.43 70.96 MW-5 6/4/93 9~.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 12/2/93 100-q4 2936 70.68 MW~5 6/4/93 M~ing 9/14/93 Missing 12/2/93 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 Unknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 3536 Unknown 12/2/93 100~1 3031 70.OO MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unkown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unkown 12/2/93 10033 3037 69.96 FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Measuring point elevations re-surveyed by Roux in January 1994. Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Prax_~ir Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Designation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes MW-1 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 No sample collected 12/2/93 No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ~D 13 8D ~2 12/z/93 so ND 0~0 ND 13 MW-4 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/o3 ~D ND ND ~D ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-$ 6/4/93 No sample collected 1212/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 No sample collected 12/2/93 No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ~D ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/2/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND 12/z/93 ND NO ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TPH-G --Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (USEPA Method $0~0/80L5) BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected SITE LOCATION · .,, .m · r-~ I Fruitvale I I.~ - ,Yt : .... : .... $_~i ;~_.. SOURCE' TRIPLE A MAP OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA ~ O' 2,000' COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR RGURE  PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT MNGR. P.S. TITLE: ROUX ASSOCIATES DATE: 06/9,3 1 ~.r~ co~s~.n~v~ SCALE: AS SHOWN SITE LOCATION / , ~,,,~F_~' PROJECT NO. 29901W FILE NAME: PATOPO-1 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I ) MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK I . ,w-3* ~ . I ¢.w-~ EXPLANATION: I ~ ~MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION I ¢ "~-~ I MISSING I J STORA6[ I TANK O' 20' 40' I CO~PILED BY: P.S, PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE  PREPPED BY: R.P. PR~ECT UNGR. P.S, ftTLE: RO~ ASSOC~TES DA~: 01//93 SITE PLAN 2 ~ ~ SC~E: AS SHOWN ~ ~ PR~ECT NO. 29901W FILE ~ME: PAFIG0{ PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK · ' ' 70.96 / , -e-Mw-2 · ,,-, ~-uw-~ L._, J, FXPLA~I'IO~: --~-MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION I -~-k(~/-5 71.10 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS J 70.68 ~ ~ LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER ELEVATION I (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) J .STORAGE O' I TANK 20' 40', I .APPROXIMATE SCALE COMPILED BY: P.S". PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE PREPARED BY: R.P. . . PROJECT MNGR. P.S. l'llLE: DATE: 01/93 ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER -~, SCALE: AS SHOWN DECEMBER 2, 1993 PROJECT NO. 29901W FIIJE NAME: PAFIG01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN' BUILDING LOADINGDOCK I I 80/ND ' I Mw-`3 I J ND/ND ~MW-7 I ND/ND I r--- ~ Mw-4 I I ~ I C~ ~ ~ -~ MW-2 ,.~o < I ~ I ~ iuw_8~ L.__ EXPLANATION' ~-- ND/ND '~-MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION J ,,, J ~ Mw-5 BO/ND CONCENTRATION OF TPH-G/BENZENE j ND/ND ND NOT DETECTED. fOR DETECTION LIMITS I SEE ATFACHEO LABORATORY REPORTS I MISSING 'ND/ND I I LPG J STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' J .APPROXIMATE SCALE COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT MNGR. P.S. TITLE: DATE: 01/9,3 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH-G)/BENZENE 4 ROUX A~SOCIATI~$ SCALE: AS SHOWN IN GROUND WATER, DECEMBER 2, 1993 ~NVIRON~4£NTAL CONSULT/NC~ ,~ ~.,~v.~.~'~ PROJECT NO. 29901W FILE NAME: PAFIO01 PRAXAIR, $505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GROUND WATER SAMPLE Fl'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~ ~ ~ I [~ WELL ID: ~ -~- ^oo ss: CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other ~o. ~-~ x ~ I.os = DATE PURGED: I~'~ _o/~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: (;~-~ ~--~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) I ( :,?:~ TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 I-~) (gaL) (units) (izn~os/cm ~ 25° C)(°P") (visual) (visual) 1.5 q.~l o. a~ c-'~.4' ~ /~,~ #, o ~.'-/£ ©. 2~ ¥ ~?, 5 ~ t..~ . FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ~ 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer ('reflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer ('reflon®) ~ Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) D0L Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Sleel) Dipper Submersible Pump ~ Dedicated Bailer Oisposable Dedicated Other:. Other:. REMARKS: PAGE [ OF [ SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI'ELD DATA SHEET PROUECT NO: ~- ~ ~1 ~ w~u. ~D: ~ ~O ~ CASING DIAMETER (inches): (._~,) 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/I_INEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other c.~.o, c.,s,,~ C,,:U.~T~ Ij~c'ruA[' mD ~.~- DTW ~.~fl~ X UN~,~. __ X v~x.u~ - ~u~e PURGE PURGED: START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOl pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR (24oo Hr) (ga.) (un~) (~mnos/crn @ 25' C) ~'F) (visuaJ) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT' WELL (i.e. FB-1. XO~-l): -' PURGING EQUI '~AMPLING EQUIPMENT ~ 2' Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder P0~ Bailer (Teflon®) Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler ~ Bailer (Stainless Steel) Subme~ Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper ~ Submers~le Pump Bailer Disposable ~ DediCated Other:. 0 ~,~e..k' ' PRINT NAME: PAGE I OF I SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FrELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~-C~D I ~ WELL ID: f CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TD J~,.Ol - DTW ~..~:> X u,~rr. = ~, DATE PURGED: [~-~.-~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: I~.- ~.-<:2_~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) IS; OO TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal:) (units) (im~hos/cm ~ 25° C) (°F) (visual) (visual) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2. Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2* Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler . Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper Submersible Pump ~ Dedicated Bailer Oisposa~ble ~ Dedicated Other. Other. REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~,~ c~ 1~ I /,~ WELL ID: ~[ ('~ J~' CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/lINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TD ~I,C~O-DTW~,C~,~.~ X UN~r. '1'7' X vou~ ~{~3,L. = ~ , DATE PURGED: [ ~-~-?.~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ ~1,- ~, - ~' ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) 13 TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (l~hos/'c~l ~ 25° C) (°P") (visual) (visual) FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): - PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ~' Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Sta~'~ss Steeq Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated ~ Bailer Disposable Dedicated Other:. Other:. REMARKS: PAGE I OF t SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE Fl'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: o~?O/~P WELL ID: ~i~/~ _.~ CASING DIAMETER (inches): _(~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other I ACTUAl. ~" [-7 x ~"~ ~ ~;.5-/ I Pu.G~ ~'. TD q~.~-DWV;;P/.~4' X u,~-. ·~ ~.1-/ = ~, DATE PURGED: { ~-~.-~/_~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: [ ~-~-~'.~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (izmhos/c~ ~ 25* C) (°1=) (visual) (visual) q,o ,7. ~ l o $ ~ Coci, ~ ,~4,j FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ,~ Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~- Bailer (Teflon®) __ Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump ~ Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated Bailer Oisposai3le Dedicated Other:. Other:. REMARKS: GROUND WATER SAMPLE Fl'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECT "O: ~,(~C} {~)1 ~ WELL ID: H/~0 7 I CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~'~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other DATE PURGED: ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~ ~[- ~ -~_~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) /~// TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 IL,) (gaL) (units) (Im'~os/'cm ~ 25° C) (°F) (visual) (visual) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i,e. FB-1, XDUP-1): -' PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump ~ Bailer (Teflon®) __ 2' Bladder Pump ~'~Bailer (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump ~ Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump __ Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated __ Bailer Disposable Dedicated Ot~er:. Other:. REMARKS: PAGE I OF I SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FI'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~(~<~O/'/,/0 WELL ID: ~k4 bO (~ CASING DIAMETER (inches): {,,~/ 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other I ~"":'"' .,17 x ~ ~'"'~"~ /z/,z::'7 .,,,c'ru.,u.. TD b"'7.~-DTW'~).3,7 X ,,~.,~. ~,~ Z/'.G<~ = ~,~ PURGE DATE PURGED: l~-~-~_.? START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE sAMpLED: [ ~' ~ -~2_~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) ~ o~ TIME VOLUME pH .. E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (~400 Hr) (gal.) (units) (lant~os/cm ~--~ 25° C) (°1~ (visual) (visual) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): - PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ~ J 2' Bladder Pump ~""-8ailer (teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~'/Bailer (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) OOL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Stee0 Dipper Submersible Pump Oedic,~ted Bailer Disposable Dedicated Other:. Other. REMARKS: PAGE I OF ~l SIGNATURE: SEQUOI N LYTICAL 1900 Bates Avenue Suite LM Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600 · FAX (510) 686-9689 ~i 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrix: Water Received: Dec 3, 1993~!! iiii Concord, CA 94520 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/8015/8020 Reported: Dec 17, 1993~iii ilil Attention: Paul Supple First Sample #: 312-0394 ' ili!~ :. :.:::~:::::::::::: >~ :: ::::: ~:,+,:;: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:: :: .< ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::: ::::::::::::::;::: :::: ::: :'.:::¥; ::::::>. :::.<:::::-.~ ::::>.::::: ~ ~ :: ~::::: >.>, :: :::::~>.;~: ~ :: ~:~::>.:.~.:>.:::::,~ :::::: :::::::::::::: ::~::: ~:.~:.:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~.:,"~: :'< ::: ~::..'~ 5: ~::~ ~ ::;~:: ::.<::.< ~:::::::¥:::::-.': ::: :: :: ¥:-': :>:::::¥::::: :~.~,-:~ ~:.< ::.':~::::>'.':::: ::::>..~:: ~:::::: ::~ ;'.'.<:::::¥: :: ¥: :: :: ~ ~:: :::: ::::: ~ TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. LD. I.D. I.D. I.D. pg/L 312-0394 312-0395 312-0396 312-0397 312-0398 312-0399 MW 1 MW 5 MW 8 MW 4 MW 7 MW 3 Purgeable Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 80 Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0.60 Ethyl Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 13 Chromatogram Pattern: .......... Gasoline Quality Control Data Report Limit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 Instrument Identification: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Surrogate Recovery, %: 101 101 98 96 98 99 (QC Limits = 70-130%) Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. Analytes reported as N.D, were not detected above the stated reporting limit. SEQUO~A~ICAL - Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3120394.ROU <1 > SEQUOI .NALYTICAL ~ 1900 Bates Avenue · Suite LM · Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600 · FAX (510) 686-9689 ::!i Moux Associates 'Client'Pi~j~=~[ ID~'P~air ~ -:. ~ ~.1~5 Gate~y Blvd., Ste. ~0 Mat~: Liquid ~ Concord, CA ~20 ~ ~ ARention: Paul Supple QC Sample Group: 31203~-~ Repo~: D~ '17, 19~.~.~ QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT ANALY'I'E Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes Benzene Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: A.T./J.D. A.T./J.D. ~T./J.D. A.T./J.D. MS/MSD · Batch#: 3120534 3120534 3120534 3120534 Date Prepared: 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 Date Analyzed: 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 Instrument I.D.#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Conc. Spiked: 20 pg/L 20 pg/L 20 pg/L 60 pg/L Matrix Spike % Recovery: 112 110 107 106 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery: 109 107 103 103 Relative % Difference: 2.7 2.8 3.8 2.9 LCS Batch#: LCS121393 LCS121393 LCS121393 LCS121393 Date Prepared: 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 Date Analyzed: 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 12/13/93 Instrument I.D.#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 LCS % Recovery: 110 106 102 103 1% Rec°very Control Limits: 71-133 72-128 72-130 71-120 I Please Note: I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents, SEQUOIA~AN~.YTICAL I preparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix sp[~<s is an aliquot of sample I fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If -- /-........~ ~ t.".c r_~c .... ~ ,,~alytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix ~ interference, the LCS recover~ is to be used to validate the batch, Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3120394.ROU <2> ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. 00576 Ground-Water Consultants I~'~ ~~y _~1~[. ~="/70 / ANALYSES PA~[ PROJECT NA"E - 'PROJECT NUMBER / .~ /~,~ / / / / / / ~ ~,t~ / /~ / / / / / / SA~PLE.'S Dine ~t~E S~L ~ED eY: (StO~.E) . ~O. DATE Tt~E S~L -... RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE lIME S~L RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE TIME INTACT I~ACT Y OR N Y OR N ~LINOUISHED B~SIONAT~E) FOR DATE TIME S~L RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE nME S~L DELIVERY M~HOD COMMENTS ANAL~ICAL ~ORATORY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 Transmittal/Memorandum To: Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Paul Supple i~ Date: October 25, 1993 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxair, Inc. Doc #PX29901W. I. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING'& MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 October 25, 1993 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed by Roux Associates, Inc., (Roux) on September 14, 1993, at the Praxair facility located at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately IA-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., (Uriah) was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000 ~g/1 (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. Ground water levels in these wells have generally dropped in the last two to three years. As of the last sampling event performed by Uriah in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 contained no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. Roux began quarterly ground water sampling at the Site in June 1993. The ground water table elevation was below the bottom of wells MW-1 and MW-5 in June 1993. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. Ground water samples were Doc #PX29901W. 1.15 Mr. Joe Lopez Page 2 of 3 October 25, 1993 collected from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 and laboratory analysis of these samples indicated petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above method detection limits. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux personnel sampled six monitoring wells at the Site on ~~=l~i]~. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells containing ground water after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Monitoring well MW-2 was blocked about 12 in. from ground surface, not allowing a bailer to be lowered down /~...~ the well. Ground water sample field data sheets are provided in the Attachments. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on September 14, 1993, is presented on Table 2. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on September 14, 1993, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-i, MW-2 through MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 ranged from 33.23 to 35.40 ft. below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). The water table elevation has risen about 14 ft. since June 4, 1993. Ground water elevations calculated from the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 indicated the direction of ground water movement at the Site was to the north at a gradient of about 0.05 (Figure 3). The measuring point elevations for monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 are unknown. LABORATORY RESULTS Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-l, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. The ground water sample collected from monitoring well MW-3 contained detectable concentrations of TPH-G at 87 ttg/L, toluene at 1.5 ~g/L, and xylene at 12 ~g/L. Benzene and ethylbenzene were not detected in the MW-3 sample. Table 2 summarizes the laboratory analytical data for the ground water samples. TPH-G and benzene concentrations are also shown on Figure 4. Doc #PX29901 W. 1.15 Mr. ~o¢ Lopez Pag~ 3 of 3 October 25, 1993 The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during January 1994. REMEDIATION SYSTEM STATUS An Application for Authority to Construct Modification was submitted to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (APCD) on June 8, 1993. Roux completed the design of the vapor extraction system for the Site during August 1993. Roux received the air permit from the APCD on September 8, 1993. Bid packages to construct the vapor extraction system were sent out to qualified contractors. Kern Environmental Services of Bakersfield, California, was selected to install the vapor extraction system at the Site and construction is scheduled to begin on November 8, 1993. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul Supple Senior Hydrogeologist Todd Ramsden, R.G. California Registered Geologist No. 5687 cc: Ms. Dolores Gough, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table 1 Ground Water Elevations Table 2 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Elevations of Ground Water, September 14, 1993 Figure 4 Concentrations of Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)/Benzene in Ground Water, September 14, 1993 Ground Water Sample Field Data Sheets Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Doc #PX29901W. l.15 Table 1: Ground Water Elevations Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Well Date Measuring Point Depth to Water Level Number Measured Elevation (1) Water (ft) Elevation (1) MW-1 6/4/93 99.02 Dry 9/14/93 99.02 33.23 65.79 MW-2 6/4/93 96.49 Dry 9/14/93 96.49 33.26 63.23 MW-3 6/4/93 97.06 Dry 9/14/93 97.06 34.05 63.01 MW-4 6/4/93 96.70 Dry 9/14/93 96.70 33.70 63.00 MW-5 6/4/93 96.84 Dry 9/14/93 96.84 34.25 62.59 MW-6 6/4/93 Missing 9/14/93 Missing MW-7 6/4/93 U~aknown 49.25 Unknown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.36 Unknown MW-8 6/4/93 Unknown 49.90 Unkown 9/14/93 Unknown 35.40 Unkown FOOTNOTES (1) = Elevations measured in feet relative to on-site datum. Measuring point elevations surveyed by Uriah in May 1990. Table 2: Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, California Sample Date BTEX Distinction Designation Sampled TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzenc Xylcnes MW-1 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-2 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 87 ND 1.5 ND 12 MW-4 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-5 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-6 6/4/93 No sample collected 9/14/93 No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 ND ND ND ND ND 9/14/93 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarboi~s as Gasoline (USEPA Method 5030/8015) BTEX Distinction CLISEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected SITE LOCATION Fruitvale ; SOURCE: TRIPLE A UAP OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA O' 2,000' COt~IPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGJR[  PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT UNGR. P.S. TITLE ROUX ASSOCI~1'ES I~1~: 06/93 ~ m~su~ ~ ks SHOWN SITE LOCATION / * ~ PROJECT NO. 29901W ; - FLE N~U~E: PATOPO-1 BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA J' I  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK I I I I I ~ j ~uw-8 ___1 EXPLANATION' C~ -q~-MW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION. J __L'jr~' ~ I I ~ I , ~w_~ ,~-, I MISSING I I I LPG J STORAGE TANK O' 20' 40' J APPROXIMATE SCALE J COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT [vlN(;R. P.S. TITLE: DATE: 01/93 SITE PLAN ~i) ROUX ASSOCLATE~ SCALE: AS SHOWN ENVI,'~ITAL CONSU~TII~ ~ ~u~;~m, rr PROJECT NO. 29901W FiLE NAME: PAFI(;01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I 63.01 ~ MW-,t 6 .oo , I ~ 63.23 ~-~ EXPLANATION: ~ CMW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ~MW~ /65.00 65.79 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS 65.29 ~ / LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WATER ELEVATION ~ (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) MISSING STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT UNGR. P.S, TITLE: ~ 0~3 ELEVATION OF GROUND WATER SCALE: AS SHOWN SEPTEMBER 14, 199~ PROJECT NO. 29901W r~LE NA~E: PAF~CO1 PRAXAIR, ~505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADINGDOCK 87/ND I .w-~ I ~ND,/ND ~-4 ~ I:~''''-'' ~ I< 0 < I ~ I ~ juw-~ --~ EXPLANATION: __0 ND/ND ~UW-1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION J J ('"~ ~w-5 j 87/ND CONCENTRATION OF TPH-G/BENZENE J ~..~..__ ND/ND] NO NOT D[TECTED. FOR DETECTION LIMITS J . ;-~ 'j-;;.:-. ..... SEE ATTACHED ~BO~ATORY REPORTS J MISSING 'ND/ND I I .. I, I LPG J STORAGE O' TANK 20' 40' J APPROX ~AT[ SCALE J COMPILED BY: P.S. PRePAReD FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE PREPARED BY: H.P.  PROJECT MNGR. P.S. T~LE: rATE: 01/93 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH-G)/BENZENE R0~ ASSOC~TES IN GROUND WATER, SEPTEMBER 14, 199~ ~ c0~ SCALE: AS SHOWN ~ ~ PR~ECT NO. 29901W FILE ~ME: PAFIG01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SEQUOI NALYTICAL 1900 Bates Avenue · Suite LM · Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600 · FAX (510) 686-9689 r~oux ~ssocazes u~en[ r'rojec[/u: r'raxalr/~zu--Jutw ~ampma: ~ep 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrix: Water Received: Sep 15, 1993~/ Concord, CA 94520 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/8015/8020 . Reported: Sep -24, 1993i~i Attention: Paul Supple First Sample #: 309-0589 TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. #g/L 309-0589 309-0590 309-0591 309-0592 309.0593 309-0594 MW1- W MW4- W MW5- W MW8- W MW7- W MW3- W Purgeable Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 87 Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.Do N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 1.5 Ethyl Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.' N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 12 Chromatogram Pattern: .......... Gasoline Quality Control Data Report Limit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/20/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/20/93 Instrument Identification: HP-5 HP-5 HP-2 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Surrogate Recovery, %: 97 97 90 119 102 (QC Umits = 70-130%) Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. Anaiytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3090589.ROU <1> SEQUOI.',.. NALYTICAL  1 900 Bates Avenue · Suite LM ° Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600° FAX (510)686-9689 a es (~ e roject : raxa /#29901w 1855 Gateway Blvd.. Ste. 770 Matrix: Water !Attention: Paul Supple QC Sample Group: 3090~-594 .... Reported: Sap 24~ ,,,1..993 QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT I ANALYTE Eth~4- I Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: J.F. J.F. J.F. J.F. Conc. Spiked: 20 20 20 60 Units: #g/L #g/L #g/L #g/L LCS Batch#: 3LCS092193 3LCS092193 3LCS092193 3LCS092193 Date Prepared: 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 Date Analyzed: 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 Instrument I.D.#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 LCS % Recovery: 113 107 101 99 Control Limits: 70-;30 70-130 70-130 70-130 MS/MSD Batch #: 309o59o 309o5.9o 309o59o 309o590 Date Prepared: 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 Date Analyzed: 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/93 9/21/03 Instrument I.D.#: HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 HP-5 Matrix Spike % Recovery: 115 110 110 107 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery: 125 120 120 115 Relative % Difference: 8.3 8.7 8.7 7.2 SEQUOIA,AN~LY'rlCAL I Please Note: _ . _ ~ The LCS is a control sample of known, interferant free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents, --'--- ~L I.~ ,,-~~' ' ~ ~ p~reparation and analytical methods employed for the samples. The LCS % recovery data is used for / '"--.~...._'~ I validation of sample batch results. Due to matrix effects, the QC limits for MS/MSD's only land are not used to accept or reject batch results. Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3090589.ROU <2> GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT.O: ~)X ~ .~ ~0 ! W WELL ~D: /~-/ / CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3 , . 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other , DATE PURGED: ~//~! ~7 START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: C/~,/'~//~'/-'~ START (2400 Hr) , ~c~.~ ENO (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (24oo H0 FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1. XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2- Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ~/~ 8a~ler (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump ~ Bailer (PVq OOL Sampler 8a~ler (Stainless Stee~ Submersrole Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Dipper Submem~le Pump Dedicated .. Baler Disposable . .. Dedicated Other. Other:. o REMARKS: tn~ tl~~ ~ d04s , · GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ri ~ '~ el4/01 (,0 WELL ID: CASING DIAMETER (incfles): 2 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other mD ~,/'~J - DTW u,~,~rr. ~ X v~.u~ = ~ PURGE DATE PURGED: START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH F_C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (1~400 Hr) (ga.) (un,s) bu~hos/cm @ 25° C) (°F) (visuaJ) (visual) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WEll (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) __ 2' Bladder Pump Balle~' (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) DOL Sampler Ba~le~ (Stainless Steel) -- Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper __ Submersible Pump __ Dedicated Ba,erOisposable __ Dedicated Other:. Othec. m=m~ { ~ GROUND WATER SAMPLE Fl'ELD DATA SHEET ..oJEcT.o: ~× ~?)¢/~ WELL,D: ~fZ~-~ CASING DIAMETER (incfles): 2 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other ° UNr=~R FT. __ X ~ -- Pt.j~ ' DATE PURGED: START (2400 Hr) ENO (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 H~) (gal.) (unas) (~rr~os/cm @ 25" C) (°F) (visual) (visual) q.~o ~-SS ~ ( ,75.0 FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2" Bladder Pump ..... Bailer (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump ,,~ Bailer (Teflon®) ,, Centrifugai Pump /~/ Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) ... Submemible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper Submers~le Pump ... Dedicated Bailer Disposable Dedicated Or.her: Other: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET / ' . CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TD ~/.~[>- OTW ~_,')..0 'K u.~rr. ~ X ~:x.u,~ = ~ PURGE DATE PURGED: ~115'/9 ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) ----?/~l'5~ START (2400 Hr) t ~_o~P (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: . END TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (24oo H0 (gak) (un,s) b~n~os/cm @ 25' C) ('F) (visua0 (vismu) FIELD OC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) .. 2' Bladder Pump .,~ Bailer (Teflon®) CentdfugaJ Pump ~ Bailer (PVC) DOg Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Submersible Pump Bailer (Stakdess Steel) Dipper Submers~le Pump Dedicated Bailer Disposable Dedicated Other. Other. : GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~)~ ~l z~'.~) !(.~ WELL ID: ~"~ ~ CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/UN EAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 O~er DATE PURGED: ~//~//~ ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) DATE SAMPLED: ~/~/~ ~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) ,/ ,! -- TIME VOLUME pH E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIOI'rY (24oo Hq (g~.) (un,ts) (~ntms/cm @ 25' c) C~ (visual) (visu~) /,S-'o I- 3 9,s-o ¢.75' '-f~- /73 FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPUNG EQUIPMENT -- 2' Bladder Pump J Bailer (Teflon®) -- 2' 81adder Pump X 8~ler (Teflon®) -- Centrifugal Pump X Bailer (PVC) -- OOL Sampler __ 8suler (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Sailer (~ Steel) Dipper Submersible Pump Dedicated Bailer Disposable Dedicated O',bec. Othec. GROUND WATER SAMPLE Fi'ELD DATA SHEET PROJECTNO: ~.~ ~ ?~//~ WELLID: m ~ -7 CASING DIAIVlETER (inches): 2 3 4 6 8 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other DATE PURGED: ~',~//yj,'~ jZ START (24oo Hr) END (2400 Hr) ,/~ /,~- ~ME VOLUME pH 'E.C. TEMPE~RE COLOR (24~ ~) (ga.) (un,s) ~o~ ~ 25' c) ('~ (~su~) (~u~) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THiS WELL (i.e. FB-1. XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT .. 2- Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®) ~ 2' Bladder Pump /~/ B~lm' (Teflon®) Centrifugal Pump > Bailer (PVC) __ OOL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer (Stainless Steel) Dipper ~ Submersible Pump Oedic~ted Bailer Oispos~ble ~ Oedic~ted Other. Other:. GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET CASING DIAMETER (inches): 2 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/LINEAR FOOT: 0.17 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TO , x ..~,~.~ X ~ = ~ ,UROE DATE PURGED: ~--//,/'ff,/~.~ START (2400 Hr) END (2400 Hr) OA'i~ SAMPLED: '~/~/Z.~ ~ START (2400 HO END (2400 Hr) ,i. ./ TIME VOLUME pH 'E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY ¢4oo Hr) (g~U.) (un,s) 6u~os/ca~ @ 25' C) (°F) (visuaJ) (visuaJ) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump Bailer (Teflon®} 2' Bladder Pump /{/Baler (Teflon®} Centrifugal Pump y Bailer (PVC) DDL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump ~ Bailer (Slainless Steel) Dipper ~ Submers~le Pump ... Dedicated Bailer Disposable __ Dedicated ~er. Other:. 'AGE ~ OF 7 SIGNATURE: FILE CONTENTS~ IN~3~ITORY ~Const~uctton Permit t Date ~Pe~mit to abandonl N~. o~"Tahks Date ~ended Permit Conditions ~Pe~mit Application Fo~m, ~ Tank sheets, PI°+ ~Appllcatio~. to Abando~ .... tanks(s) Date ~Annual Report Fo[ms ~Copy of W~ttten Contract Between Owner & ope~at'o~ ~ '. ~[nspect ion Reports , .. . ~Correspondence - Received ~te . Date ~Cor~espondence - Hailed · ' Da te - Date ~te ~Unauthott~ed Re,ease Reports ~Abandonment/C~oau[e Re~ort. ~ 5ampl lng/Lab Reports .................. ~.VF Comp~la.ce Check (New Co.~tr~cttOn Checklist) ........ ~STD C~pltan~e Check (New Construction Checklist) ~HVF els. Check (New Co.st[ucttoR) ~STD Plan Check (New Construction) ~MVF Plan Check (Exist~ng Facility) ~STD Pla. Check (Existing FacilSty)  "Incomplete Application' Form Permi~ Application Checklis~ ~Permi~ Instructions ~Discarded ~Tightnes. Teat Results Date Da te Date ~onltotl~ Well ConstruCtion Da~a/~er~lfs ......... ~Environmental Sensitivity Data: Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs Location of Water Wells ~Statement of Underground Conduits ~Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data ~ Photos ~Construction Drawings Location: ~Half sheet show~g date received and tally of inspe~tio~tfm~,'"'~fc FII,E CONTENTS INVENTORY' l I ty 6tat Permit to Abandon , Aq'~'~ of 'Fa,iRa i Date Permit to Construct ~ Date Permit to Operate ~ "~33~ Date Application to Abandon Tank(s) Date aO~lication to Construct A~lication to Operate Tank Sheets Plot Plans Amended Permit t;onditions Annual Report Forms Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator Inspection Reports Correspondence - Received Date Date Date Date Date Correspondence Mai led Date Date Date Date Date Dnauthorized Release Reports Ahandonment/Closure Reports SamplinM/Lab Reports MVF Compliance Check (Ne~ Construction Checklistl STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) MVF Plan Check {New (2onstruction) STD Plan Check (Ne~ Construction} MVF Plan Check {Existing Facility) S'rD Plan Check (Existing Facility) "Incomplete Application" Form Permit Application Checklist Permit Instructions Discarded 'rightness 'rest Results Date Date Date Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits Environmental Sansttivity Data: (;rottndwnter I)rllling, Borin~ Logs [,ocati.n of Water ~ells Plot Plan Feal'uvillE AIl I.;nvi~'onmenLally ~ensit. ive Data Photos Cons truer iOll Draw iugs Locat ion: MisceJ laneous ******* TRAHSMISSIOH REPORT( SEP 88 '93 ) ; KERM CO EHV HLTH (88 ************** DATE START REMOTE TERMIHAL MODE TIME PAGES RESULT SEP 28 88:43 5106022333 GBT 01'2g" 003 OK ENvlROJ~JJMENTAL HEALTH sEIJ~IcES DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 27oo 'M' St~t, DIRECTOR ~ ~ CA 9: (805) ~61-,t42~ F, TRANSMITTAL SHEET n~oM: 'Pn l ~ Name Company'/gepaz"~men'c TOTAL PAGES (includxng this cover page) GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SAMPLING DATA FOR: Baker's Welding Supply 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA WELL WELL DEPTH TO WELL MINIMUM GAL. TO NO. DEPTH WATER TABLE VOL. BE PUMPED (FEET) (FEET) (GAL.) (GAL.) MW-1 ~0_~6~ 35.60 0.4 2.0 MW-2 39.25 32.96 1.0 5.0 MW-3 43.60 33.57 1.6 8.0 MW-4 42.60 33.16 1.5 7.5 MW-5 44.50 33.50 1.76 8.8 MW-6 45.00 33.28 1.9 9.4 TIME GAL. pH CONDUCTIVITY TEMPERATURE PUMPED (umhos/cm) (Centigrade) Date: May 2, 1990 Sample #MW-2 l:00p 1.0 6.7 780 17.0 1:03p 2.0 6.4 690 20.0 3.0 6.4 660 19.0 1:06p 1:09p 4.0 6.5 660 20.0 1:12p 5.0 6.4 640 20.0 1:15p 6.0 6.4 660 20.0 1:18p 7.0 6.4 660 20.0 ~W mm,~mm Wmmmm m mmmm mm m..m ~ .... m~ ,~ Figure 2 i ~ ~O 6 ~w-4 ~ [~-".~ ~~4_ 6L53 ~ ~ ~oniloring Well ~ G Di of' I '1 ] ~ Orouna~ter 63.32 63.40 Groundwater Gradient ~G Determined on 5/3/90 S)ORAG~ Uriah, Inc. I URIAH INC. A Bokers Wemding Suppl~ 'm- Pro,eot Number: 12190WF ~505 Pierce Rood, 8oke~s()eld, CA~ Dote: Uoy 1, 1990 No~h ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT 1855 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX~ 510 687-1258 Tm~~emomndm To: Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite' 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 From: Paul Supple ~ Date: June 28, 1993 Subject: Quarterly Ground Water Monitoring Praxair Location Permit No. 050033 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California Job No.: 29901W Remarks: On behalf of Praxair, Inc., enclosed is one copy of the subject report for your files. cc: Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Joe Lopez, Praxalr, Inc. Doc #PX2990I W. 1.13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT ~ 1855 GA~AY BOULEVARD SUITE 770 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 510 602-2333 FAX# 510 687-1258 June 28, 1993 Mr. Joe Lopez Praxair, Inc. 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT NO. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAICERS~, CA!JFO~ Dear Mr. Lopez: This letter report presents the results of quarterly ground water sampling performed on June 4, 1993, at the Praxair facility located at' 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California (Site, Figure 1). BACKGROUND The Praxair facility is located on the west side of Pierce Road near the intersection with Orin Way. The Site is approximately %-mile north of the intersection of Highway 99 and Highway 58. The Site is an industrial gas distribution facility (Figure 2). In December 1987, a fuel leak was reported from a 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank. This tank was removed and a limited environmental site assessment was conducted by Krazan and Associates. Their assessment indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the 1987 fuel leak remained in the shallow subsurface. In 1989, Uriah, Inc., was retained to install, develop, and sample ground water monitoring wells around the former tank pit. A total of eight monitoring wells were installed between October 1989 and June 1991. Samples collected from these wells have shown hydrocarbon concentrations as high as 18,000/~g/1 (MW-3, November 19, 1990) in ground water. However, ground water levels in these wells have generally dropped in the last two to three years. As of the last sampling event in November 1991, the ground water table elevation was below the bottoms of wells MW-1 through MW-6. Ground water samples from deeper wells MW-7 and MW-8 exhibited no petroleum hydrocarbons in November 1991. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Roux Associates personnel sampled monitoring wells at the Site on June 4, 1993. Prior to sampling, the water level elevation in each well was measured using a Solinst water level meter Doc #PX29901W. I. 13 (Table 1). 'Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells containing ground water after three casing volumes of water had been purged from each well. Ground water sample field data sheets ~ provided in the Attachments. Water samples were collected in a clean teflon bailer and then transferred into two 40-milliliter Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) vials. The vials were stored in an ice chest while in transit to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody documentation was maintained for the samples. Ground water samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories of Concord, California, for total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) by USEPA Method 5030/8015/8020. A summary of the laboratory analytical data for ground water samples collected at the Site on June 4, 1993, is presented on Table 1. The laboratory analytical reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation forms for water samples are included in the Attachments. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Depth to ground water was measured on June 4, 1993, in seven monitoring wells at the Site. Monitoring well MW-6 could not be located and appears to have been paved over. The depth to ground water measured in monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were 49.25 and 49.90 feet below ground surface, respectively. The other five monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-5) were dry. LABORATORY RESULTS Laboratory analyses of the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 indicated TPH-G and BTEX compounds were not present above method detection limits. Table 1 summarizes the laboratory analytical data for the ground water samples. The next quarterly ground water samples are scheduled to be collected and analyzed during September 1993. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES Pau Supp e Todd Ramsden, R.G. Senior Hyydrogeologist California Registered Geologist No. 5687 cc: Ms. Dolores Gough,- Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Attachments: Table 1 Summary of Ground Water Sample Analyses Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Plan Ground Water Sample Field Data Sheets Laboratory Reports Chain-of-Custody Documentation Doc #PX2990IW. l.13 Table 1: Snmmnry of Ground Water Sample Analyses Praxair Facility, Bakersfield, .California Sample Date Depth to BTEX Distinction Designation Sampled Water (ft.) TPH-G Benzene Toluene F. thylbenzene Xylenes MW-1 6/4/93 Dry No sample collected MW-2 6/4/93 Dry No sample collected MW-3 6/4/93 Dry No sample collected MW-4 6/4/93 Dry No sample collected M3~-5 6/4/93 Dry No sample.collected lVlW~ 6/4/93-- ~"- No sample collected MW-7 6/4/93 49.25 ND ND ND ND ND MW-8 6/4/93 49.90 ND ND ND ND ND FOOTNOTES All concentrations reported in ug/L (ppb) TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (USEPA Method .5030/8013") BTEX Distinction (USEPA Method 8020) ND = Not Detected SITE LOCATION SOURCE: TRIPLE A MAP OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA AREA ~ O' 2,000° COMPILED BY: P.S. PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR FIGURE  PREPARED BY: R.P. PROJECT UNGR. P.S. TITLE: ROUX ASSOCIATES )ATE: 06/93 ~ ~¢,,,,~,,~,~ ,c~,~uz.r~ SCALE: AS SHOWN SITE LOCATION / '* ~ PROJECT NO. 29901W fiLE NAME: PATOPO-1 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA  MAIN BUILDING LOADING DOCK · I I I 0 I I . EXPLANATION: · ~-5 ~MW-1 MONITORING WELLI I ~ LPG J STORAGE O' ~ ~NK 20' 40' J COMPILED BY: P.S. ~PREPARED FOR: PRAXAIR ' PREPPED BY: H.P. PR~ECT MNGR. P.S. T~LE: DAE: 01/93 SCSI: ~ SHOWN SITE P~N PR~ECT NO. 29901W FILE ~E: PAF~01 PRAXAIR, 3505 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA' GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: ~ ~ c~D / W WELL ID: M ~ - "~ CUENT/STATION 8: ' ADDRESS: CASING DIAMETER (inches): // 2 'X~ 3 4 6 8 ' 12 Other GALLON/MNEAR FOOT: ~ 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other 'rD (, ~,'/o- DTW ~/'~,~x ~ ~"~~ ~"~'~ &" '~ I PU.GE '7, b ,,, u.~-. ,17 x DATE PURGED: ~ START (2400 Hr) J DATE SAMPLED:~/L/,/~; ~... START (2400 Hr) / 2 ~' -~ END (2400 Hr) ------ TIME VOLUME pH ' 'E.C. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2400 Hr) (gal.) (units) ({~nhos/cm ~ 25' C] CF) (visual) (visual) ! 'zl.~ ~ ,~ -7. ~ FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPENG EQUIPMENT 2' Bladder Pump v. Baler (Teflon®) 2' Bladder Pump V"/Bailer (Teflon~ Centrifugal Pump Bailer (PVC) DOt. Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submers~le Pump ... Sailer (Stainless Steel) ~ Dipper ~ Submersible Pump .. Dedicated Ba~'le~ Disposable Dedicated Ot~er. Othec REMARKS: PRINT NAME: PAGE : OF SIGNATURE: GROUND WATER SAMPLE FIELD DATA SHEET PROJECT NO: Z.<~ ?~ I ~ WELL ID: /-~ c,3 - ~5 CUENT/STATION 8.: ADDRESS: CASING DIAMETER (inches): ~_~.~ 3 4 6 8 12 Other ~ON/UNEAR FOOT: ~ 0.38 0.66 1.5 2.6 5.8 Other TD<~.Za-DTW ~/'/,%X u.~rr. ¢>,17 X vou~e = ~ DATE PURGED: (e/~//¢~ ~ START (2400 Hr) [ /; ~ END (2400 Hr) j'! 5 .~ DATE SAMPLED: ~'//~/~3 START (2400 Hr) I! 5 ~ END (2400 Hr) TIME VOLUME pH ' E.c. TEMPERATURE COLOR TURBIDITY (2,,mo Hr) (ga.) (units) (pmflos/cm @ :25' C) CF) (visual) (visuaJ) FIELD QC SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THIS WELL (i.e. FB-1, XDUP-1): PURGING EQUIPMENT SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ./ .., 2' Bladder Pump V/' Baler (l'eflon~)) ~ 2' Bladder Pump V Bailer ('reflon~) Ce~h-i;i~jal Pump Baler (PVC) ODL Sampler Bailer (Stainless Steel) Submersible Pump Bailer ~ Steel) ~ Dipper Submersible Pump Oed'mated Bailer Disposable Dedicated REMARKS: PRINT NAME: PAGE OF SIGNATURE: 1900 Bates Avenue Suite LM Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600 · FAX (510) 686-9689 RECEIVED JUf 1 8 :.~.~ ~.~.;,~ ~ ~,~..~,,~:~ ..<..: .:,-.: .: .: .: .:.....: ~ ~ <.:<., :¢. :.~ .: .~ :..v....¢.: .: < .:< <...>~ ~ :: :..~ :.~ >.>~.~/.~.~.>..~ ~. ~..<...-¢ .~...>:~. <. ye ~#,: < .:-: A :=-'.< ."<: ¢ '~:'-"-" :' ~: ': ~ :.~ ~.::?. ~..;..'~? ~~~'' ~/~." >:' ~: < ':' :':': C~/t[~'~:~ates "~ient Pi~ject iD: ~~/'='lS~r 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Sample Matrix: Water Received: Jun 4, 1993~!I Concord, CA 94520 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/8015/8020 Reported: Jun '16, 1993i!ii Attention: Paul Supple First Sample #: 306-0223 TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION Reporting Sample Sample Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. /~g/L 306-0223 306-0224 MW - 8 MW - 7 Purgeable Hydrocarbons 50 N.D. N.D. Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. Toluene 0.5 N.D. N.D. Ethyl Benzene 0.5 N.D. N.D. Total Xylenes 0.5 N.D. N.D. Chromatogram Pattern: .... Quality Control Data Report Umit Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 Date Analyzed: 6/8/93 6/8/93 Instrument Identification: HP-4 HP-4 Surrogate Recovery, %: 99 94 (QC Limits = 70-130%) Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard. Analytes reported as N,D, were not detected above the stated reporting limit, CAL Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3060223.ROU < 1 > SEQUOiA J NAL iCAL 1900 Bates Avenue * Suite LM · Concord, California 94520 (510) 686-9600 · FAX (510) 686-9689 t~oux,,~ssoclates Client Project ID: #29901W/?raxalr 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 770 Matrix: Water Concord, CA 94520 ' Atte~on: Paul Supple QC Sample Group 3060223-224 Reported: Jun 16, 1993 ...> ~:~,~.>~:~. > .:.:. ~..:.:. ?..:....:<.:.:..-<~ ~ ~ ~ x. > ~..:~ .:. >.. < <...:<<<.~....:..-...,. ~:. ~........., >...:.:. :..... ~....~ ........,......,....> .> .:.:~:.:..:.:..:.. ~: ................ .:..:.:..:.:.....:.:..:~::~:~.~-'~<w. !~.~>~.~.<:>~......:<.: >:.:..~¥~:~~~;~E[~:= QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT I ANALYTE Ethyl- I Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 Analyst: J.F. J.F. J.F. J.F. Conc. Spiked: 20 20 20 60 Units: pg/L #g/L pg/L pg/L LCS Batch#: 2LCS060893 2LCS060893 2LCS060893 2LCS060893 Date Prepared: 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 Date Analyzed: 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 Instrument I.D.#: HP-4 HP-4 HP-4 HP-4 LCS % Recovery: 91 91 94 95 Control Limits: 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 MS/MSD Batch #: 3060o68 306oo68 3060068 3060068 Date Prepared: 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 Date Analyzed: 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 Instrument I.D.#: HP-4 HP-4 HP-4 HP-4 Matrix Spike % Recovery: 90 90 95 95 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery: 90 90 95 95 Relative % Difference: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SEQUOI~YTICAL J Please Note: ~ The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents. /~ ~ ~ I preparation and analytical methods employed for the samples. The LCS % recovery data is used for ~ ~ I w;;~;,~[;c~, cf ~_=~:.~ple batch results. Due to matrix effects, the QC limits for MS/MSD's are advisory only I and are not used to accept or reject batch results. · Kenneth K.F. Lee Laboratory Director 3060223.ROU <2> ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODYN.o 00540"" ' Ground-Water Consultants t~ ~y [~,~.[e,.~,~ ~770 /' ANALYSES PA~E OF ROUX ASSOCIATES INC = ' ISHED. ~:. (SIGNATURE) FOR I ~ Y OR N Y OR N RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR OATE lIME S~L RECEI~D BY: (SIGNATURE) FOR DATE INTACT I~ACT Y OR N Y OR N DELIVERY M~HOD COMMENTS ..-- - : -_ 'Em~ller Service 5117 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Tel (510) 866-6800 Fax (510) 866-6912 May 13, 1993 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services / ~/c~ Hazardous Materi al s Management ProgramBakersfield,2700 "M" Street,cai i forni aSuite 30093301 SUBJECT: PRAXAIR LOCATION PERMIT No. 050033 3505 PIERCE ROAD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA Dear Ms. Gough: I would first like to take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time to meet with Steve Anderson from Roux Associates and myself. As we discussed in our meeting our mutual goal is to ensure that site remediation work begins very soon at the above mentioned location. Again I would like to assure you that Praxair is committed to cleaning up the site, and with Roux Associates spear heading the effort I'm..confident it will be done in an expeditions manner. In an effort to capture some of the key issues discussed at our meeting I would like to provide a short summary, hopefully in sequential order: 1. You would like to have the vapor extraction system operational as soon as possible. 2. The site remains as a high priority to you due to intrusion into the groundwater. 3. You stated that you would like to see quarterly monitoring reports, which will be started by June 30, 1993. 4. Roux has committed that 45-60 days after receiving an Authority to Construct and Operate the vapor extraction system from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the system will be operational. A copy of the Air Permit. will be forwarded to your office. An Atmosphere of Excellence BAKERSFIELD, CA PAGE 2 m~AY 13, 1993 PRAJCAIR FACILITY 5. You have indicated that you want monitoring samples prior to the vapor's entering the first carbon unit. Roux has agreed. 6. After installation of the system you would like to be notified, and when the monitoring well's are to be sampled you would like to be notified two days in advance. Steve Anderson agreed to these arrangements. 7. You indicated that site closure is different from site to site, but for our site you indicated' that the scenario could be dependent on monthly analysis, with three months of non-detect, the system would then be turned off for a couple of weeks, then turned on and monitored, if we still have at non-detectable levels, a confirmation boring would be put in, and if everything looks acceptable we could then close. One of the main constituents of concern is benzene, which would have to be at or below the MCL of 1 ppb. Also you indicated that you weren't sure if we were located in a drinking water aquifier, you indicated that you might be able to get something to us in writing on the protocol for closure. 8. I indicated that all correspondence relating to the site should be forwarded to my attention, so as to ensure a timely response. 9. Steve Anderson mentioned that Roux would probably use a double bank of activated carbon in place of a catalytic oxidation burner. You indicated that this technology would be acceptable. Overall we had a very productive meeting in a short period of time, and it is our goal to move ahead as quickly as the system will permit. We will keep you posted on our progress, by way of a milestone chart that Roux Associates will put together. If you have any questions or concerns or if I~ve misstated any facts please contact me at (510) 866-6810, if I~m away from my desk please leave a voice mail, again thank you for your time and patience. Very truly yours, Joe Lopez, R.E.A. Safety & Environmental Specialist Western Area CC: Steve Anderson - Roux L. E. Barron - Danbury W. J. Callahan - Altair H. T. Prosser - Fontana IJL/jas ENVlRONME' I I'AL HEALTH SERVICc( I DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 DIRECTOR !V Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX Mr. Joe Lopez March 4, 1993 Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Remediation, Baker's Welding, 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Permit No. 050033 Dear Mr. Lopez: The purpose of this letter is to determine the status of the proposed vapor extraction to remediate gasoline contamination at the subject site. A review of our records indicates that the workplan for its implementation was approved in July 1992. In addition, we requested that information on actual equipment that will be installed on site be provided to this office. To date, we have not received this information. Please submit the additional information within fifteen (15) days from the date of this letter. The status of the workplan implementation must also be addressed at the same time. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director Bv: Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Uriah, Inc. ~gough\050033-3.1tr C@P¥ Charge No. of Description Per Page Pages Cost First copy (not exceeding 8V:" x 14") $ .75 [ --7 ~' Additional copies of the same page or additional pages of the same document $ .10 (not exceeding 8W'x 14") , ~, ~ 3 ~ E5 First copy (size exceeding 8½"x 14") $ 1.25 Additional copies of the same page or additional pages of the same document $ .25 (size exceeding 8½"x 14") Postage (if mailed) Handling Charge (if mailed) $ .50 Total Charges ~) 5 · ,,~URCE MANAGEMEN~ .~[ENC¥  Env~tonmemaJ Health Sewk:es Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEV~ McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ~, Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE 111 WU.UAM J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Ptanning & Development Setvk:es Department TED ~AMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT July 23, 1992 Mr. W. J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Revised Workplan for the Remediation of Gasoline-Contaminated Soil at 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit #: 050033) Dear Mr. Callahan: We have reviewed the subject workplan prepared by Uriah Inc. As a result of the decrease in groundwater level, the use of groundwater monitoring wells labeled MW-3, -4, and -5 as vapor extraction wells for the proposed soil remediation system is acceptable to this Department. Prior to installing the vapor treatment unit, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) must be contacted for permit require- ments. Please provide this Department with a copy of your permit application to SJVUAPCD for information on actual equipment that will be installed on site. In addition, a progress report is required if the remediation will continue over three months. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:ch cc: John Rapp gough\callahan.let 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 I ~ Main Building I (~ Looding Dock I MW-4 ~ 6ener~l Dlractlen Of ~ i :~,, ~ou.~ r,o~_~ I . o 0 · . ~, ' ~..~, '-'b~.~ ~'~ ~'''' I ,,, 1"=20' I Bakers Welding SupplyI Triah Inc 3505 Pierce ~oad Bakersfield, CA Environmental Ser~ces Company URCE MANA6EMENT , .NC¥  EnvironmentaJ ~th ~ ~NDALL L. ABBO~ sT~ McC~ ~ ~, ~, D~O~ DIRECTOR A~ Po~.~ co~t~ ~ DAVID PRICE I!1 ~ a. ~ODDY, ~O A~T~T DI~CTOR ~ b ~e~t ~ ~ ~ J~, ~CP, D~R ~VIRONMENTAL H~L~ S~C~ D~AR~ENT March 10, 1992 Mr. W.J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's Welding Permit #: 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: The January 1992 Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report prepared by Uriah, Inc., has been reviewed. The report showed that no concentration of BTX&E and TPH(g) above the minimum reporting level was found from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8. The other six wells were dry. The report also described the physical condition of the wells as a result of the recent regrading and repaving at the site. A visit to the site confirmed Uriah's findings. The following summarizes our requirements to correct the situation: 1. An effort should be made to fix MW-3 and MW-5 such that no water or other materials can get in and the wells may be useful (if needed in the future). If this is not possible, then the wells have to be properly abandoned. 2. Replace the locks and whatever is necessary to maintain the integrity, of MW-7 and MW-8. 3. Locate MW-6 and check its condition along with MW-4. If these wells cannot be fixed, then they have to be properly abandoned and replaced (if necessary). Regarding remediation, we require that the quarterly groundwater monitoring be continued. If the analysis show no significant levels of gasolin~e contamination again, .we. recommend that remediation alternatives be re-evaluated. Vapor extraction may be a suitable alternative for the vadose zone. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Mr. W.J. Callahan March 10, 1992 Page 2 The next quarterly monitoring shall be started by March 23, 1992. Please notify this office at least 48 hours prior to starting work. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gougti Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Uriah, Inc. \050033-2.1tr R,i ~URCE MANAGEMENT....~NCY  Environmental Health Serve:es Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McCAi ! Fy, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ^ir Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE !!I VaLUAM J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Deveiora~em Services Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT February 3, 1992 W. J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's Welding Permit #: 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: This letter is to remind you of the necessary deadlines for work required at the subject site. A review of our records showed that an addendum to the February 1991 Remedial Action Plan was due in November 1991. The groundwater wells were also sampled in November 1991. To date, the addendum and the sampling results have not been received by this Department. Please submit the requested information within 15 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, 0 ;', Dolores Gough :: i~' Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Valentin Constantinescu, Uriah, Inc. \050033.1tr 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429  Environmenta] Health Services Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT ST~VE McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ^ir Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE !11 W~UdA~ J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning &: Development Services Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT October 9, 1991 W. J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location : 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As : Baker's Welding Permit # : 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: We have reviewed the August 30, 1991, groundwater monitoring/wells installation report prepared by Uriah, Inc., for the subject site. The following summarizes the information presented in the report: 1. Two soil borings were drilled and completed into groundwater wells (MW-7 and MW-8), in June of this year. Groundwater was encountered at about 50 feet. 2. Analytical results indicated the presence of low levels of gasoline constituents in the soil at depths of 36.5 to 46 feet. Gasoline constituents over the drinking water standards established by the Department of Health Services and water quality goals set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board were also found in the groundwater despite the decline in the water table. 3. The hydraulic conductivity (K) of the water-bearing formation was determined by conducting slug tests using Hvorslev Method on both MW-7 and MW-8. The "K" values are 3.19 X 10 -s ft/sec for MW-7 and 3.77 X 10 -5 ft/sec for MW-8. 4. Remediation by pumping was simulated using SUTRA, a computer model for solute transport in the saturated - unsaturated zone. Pumping rates of 0.04 and 0.02 ft3/sec were assumed in the model. 5. Uriah, Inc., recommended aerobic biodegradation as the method to remediate the soil and groundwater contamination. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 W.J. Callahan October 9, 1991 Page 2 As mentioned in our March 20, 1991, letter, the "pump and treat" method to remediate groundwater is acceptable to this Department. However, the water treatment alternative must be capable of treating the water to the approved action levels. This aspect of the proposed system has to be addressed further. In addition, the disposition of the treated water has to be provided. Regarding the soil contamination, the treatment system/process still needs some clarification. The clean-up levels also need to be addressed. Please submit your response to our concerns as an addendum to the February 1991 Remedial Action Plan by November 18, 1991. Our other requirements on a remedial action plan such as a health and safety plan must also be addressed then. Please refer to the Kern County Handbook UT-35 on these requirements. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:ch cc: Valentin Constantinescu, Uriah, Inc. Michael Mangold, RWQCB gough\callahan.let , PERMIT #: 050033 BAKER'S WELDING GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA WELL WELL GW SAMPLE B T X E TPHI g iD D~.P.'H DEPTH DATE LAB ******** P P B ******** MW-1 36.6 ~°7 .3 Oct-89 BC ND ND ND ND ND 33. I 35.6 Hay-90 BC ND ND ND ND ND 35.-I Aug-90 BC d r y Nov-90 BC d r 5' }IW-2 40.0 27.3 Oct-89 BC 22.2 2.4 ND ND 125 39.3 :)3.0 Hay-90 BC 43 33 26.3 31 370 39. '2 36.2 Aug-90 BC ND ND ND ND ND Nov-g0 BC d r v ~tW- 3 43. 7 29. i Oct-S9 BC 90 140 550 990 3076 -13.6 33.6 Ha¥-9O BC 360 3100 1590 30 11000 ~'; 5 36 8 Aug-90 BC 220 2700 7°0 84 6000 43,7 39.8 Nov-90 BC 200 3800 3110 260 18000 H~,(--i t2.6 33.2 !-!ay- 90 BC i 10 i10 .t06 ND 1900 ~-' o do. Aug-90 u. . . o~ 6 35 8 9 1 ;0 --! '". 0 39.5 Nov-90 BC ND ND ND ND :iD /~}~'-i :-~. ,:~ ,:,. 3 .lay-90 BC 58 !30 96o 290 5000 '" 8 36 ~ o._ o.. , t8 -tTO ±.t90 o Au 0 BC ' 380 7 i 00 44. ~ 40. :3 Nov-90 zqC 26 i9 154 3. ,5 640 M~-~ 4:5.0 33 .3 Hay- q0~ BC XD ND ,_~. 06 ND 83 · '" -1 - ' -' ND -!4 -t ,-,[ . ;} :m~2-90 BC ND ND .~D .'~D 44.9 -!0.0 Nov-90 BC ND ND ND ND ND RE-.OOURCE MANAGEMENT GE. NCY  Environmental Health ~ Detx~m~nent RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ~r eo~o~ Co~ D~ DAVID PRICE 111 VaLLU~ J. ROOD¥, ~J~CO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR laan~ing & Development Se~vice~ Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL8 PERMIT #: MW 6S$-05 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MW 8SS-0S MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT OWNER'S NAME: Bakers Weldinq and Supply DATE: June 18, 1991 FACILITY NAME: Bakers Welding and Supply FACILITY LQCATION: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA 93308 DRILLING METHOD', Hollow Stem Auger CONTRACTOR: Melton Drillinq UCENSE NO,: C 57 / 50827 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR Uriah TYPE QF MONITORING WELL(S). Groundwater NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: Two (2) at this time. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT: 1. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2.Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features. 3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of any seals or plugs. 4.Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Depmtment representatives. 5. All wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where degradation may occur must be destroyed after 2 years or prove no degradation is occurring or has occurred. 6. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conclitions or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER." 7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report, as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses, must be submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work. 8. A well destruction application must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit. 9. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of Issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable. 10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth approximately 32'. This permit must be signed by either the contractor or owner. ,~~ j~,¥/._/~ ~.~,~ ~_,,~. OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE PERMIT APPROVED BY: Brian Pitts, Hazardous Materials Specialist BP: cas \655-05. mw 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 RANDALL L. ABBOTT DIRECTOR DAVID ~ D! ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPAR'1'M~NT HAZAPlI~OUB Mg)'L=RIAL,9 APPUOATION FOR A PERMIT TO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CIROLE ONE) CONS'tRUe, RECON81'Ru~"r, ~ONITORING WELL APRUOATION DEEPEN OR DE&TROy A WELL DATE STARTING OATE ~ ~j~/ ' - os ~pPeov~a UST ( ) Yis ( ~ ao OJPTH tO ~ROUND~TH & ~L~ PrRJCtlOi PERFORilD BY:.,~~/~ [~~/~~ RlJlStKATION J: JOB SI t[: 40-ACl[ UtKCTION~ TO ~LL SJT~: ~IENERAL CONDITION~ OF THE PERMIT: 1. Permit annllemtens mum be subml~eel m~q! Er~/tr~qttmntal Health ~w~ Oiean~ m Je~ 10 wo~tne ~a~ ~d~ to_t~e embed 2. Well m~J ~p~e · ~ul~ ~ ~ginntng ~ ~rk ~ to ~1 o~~. wnloh an lna~n ia mqul~ unlm Inl~=n ~ ~ Of ~m~lm~, / A ~one cCI m t~ Dl~mem ~ M r~ul~ on ~e mor~nO ~ the. ~ay the ~ la m ~m~e w ~ ~um De~'the pl~emem ~ ~ W ~ ~lug& & C~t~ un~ef mia Pe~ a a~ to a~ Inmm~l~ ~ De.mere 6, A~ ~8re~mee~ or ~noomalM~ w ~ul~ P~a ~n~l~e or Oml~oe win Mue In M~Ge ~ a ~ W~.Omer,' tO ~e E~o~e~ He~ 8e~e Oe~em wihln 14 ~W8 ~f eompl~ 8. A ~ll ~e~n ap~l~ mw ~ fJ~ ~ t~ Oep~ ~ a weft Il P~ · ,.,_ / Moin Building J Loading Dock J , - OmY) J · · L"IJ Monllortng W~ll Placements On l~l ~/~ Greundweler Flow. .~oufftwest Corner Of Main Bulld[~ J ~0~ 0 ~o~nd Groud~r W~l ~ca~ LScale: .__~ J Bskers Welding Supply Project Number: 12190~ ]r-~rr i ~' ~ ~" 3505 Pierce Road - ' * Bakersfield, CA ~ Environmental Se~ces Company RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AG£NCY  Environmental Health ~ Department RANDAI_!: L. ABBOTT STEVE McCa! ~ Fy, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ~r Po~t~ co.~ ~ DAVID PRICE 111 ~ J. RODD¥, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR P~rming & Develo~r~ent 5e~c~ Deparm~,nt TED JAMES, ~ICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT May 29, 1901 W. J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 26?8 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's Welding (Union Carbide) Permit #: 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: We have reviewed Uriah Inc.'s response to our concerns regarding the February, 1991, proposed remedial action plan for the subject site. Uriah's proposal to install two additional groundwater wells by MW-3 and MP/-5 is acceptable to this Oepartment. DurinM the drilling, we require that soil samples be retrieved, field screened, and/or sent for laboratory analysis (as necessary) starting at 35 feet down to a depth just above the groundwater. Our reason for this requirement is to get information on the impact of the declining water table to the soil. The slug test using Hvorslev method is also acceptable and can be conducted following the installation of the new wells. After all the testing has been completed, the results shall be evaluated to determine if "pump and treat" is still necessary or if it is still the most appropriate and cost-effective alternative to remediate the groundwater. The well installation must be started by July 1, 1991. Enclosed is an application form for the additional wells. Please keep us informed on the schedule of all field activities. If you have any questions reMarding this matter. I can be reached at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores 6ough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Valentln Constantinescu, Uriah Inc. (w/encl.) Michael Mangold, CVRWQCB (w/o encl.) 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Uriah lnc An Environmental Services Company May 10, 1991 Ms. Delores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Program 2700 "M" Street, Suite #300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Baker's Welding, 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Site Permit #050033. Dear Ms. Gough: Thank you for your letter of March 20, 1991 and your comments regarding portions of the Remedial Action Plan previously submitted by Uriah concerning treatment of fuel hydrocarbon contaminated soil and groundwater at the referenced site. In response to those comments, we wish to propose the following: 1) The groundwater monitoring wells installed by Uriah were constructed primarily for the purposes of plume definition and compliance monitoring. We agree that the significant lowering of the water table as a result of the continuing drought presents a barrier to the installation of a treatment system which requires a high rate of pumping. We wish to propose, therefore, that two additional 2"-diameter wells ~i~be installed in the area of existing wells MW-3 and MW-5. Each ~/'"'of the new wells would be advanced to a depth of between 50' and 55' below ground surface. Each well would contain 0.020 slotted PVC well screen installed at least 15.0' below the depth of the lowest water table measured during the year 1990. 2) That hydraulic conductivity of the impacted formation be determined within all existing wells using the Hvorslev Method. This method is represented by the formula: K= (r2 in [L/R])/(2LT0), where: K is the hydraulic conductivity. r is the radius of the well casing. R is the radius of the well screen. L is the length of the well screen submerged in groundwater. T0 is the time it takes for the water level to rise or fall to 37% of the initial change. 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 With the Hvorslev Method, the water level in a well is measured before extracting an additional, known volume of water. Immediately after the water is extracted, the water level in the well is again measured (with water level measurements taken at timed intervals). The height of the water immediately upon extraction (of water) is "h ". The height of the water after a period of time "t" is "h"? Data is plotted by computing the ratio h/h and plotting it versus time on semi-logarithmic paper. o SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated Transport), a computer program developed by the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Air Force, will be used to simulate fluid movement and the transport of dissolved contaminants in the.subsurface. The model uses hydraulic conductivities, porosities, aquifer thicknesses, and contaminant concentrations determined from well logs, laboratory analyses, and/or field tests, along with the hydraulic gradient(s) as input parameters and employs a two-dimensional hybrid finite-element and integrated-finite-difference method to approximate the governing equations that describe the two interdependent processes that are simulated. ~/3) As specified, Wells MW-2 and MW-4 will not be used as injection sites. These wells were deemed appropriate for this purpose as the mos~t recent laboratory a~alyses_3_ndicated the water was free of contamination, however, as this is not acceptable, we would propose to determine a radius of influence for each well using the Hvorslev Method. The information thus obtained would then be used to develop alternative pumping strategies using SUTRA. Upon reviewing the resultant data, an appropriate injection-extraction format could be developed. This format would then be presented to the Hazardous Materials Management Program for review and comment. Thank you for your assistance to date. We trust that the information provided herein is an adequate response to your concerns. If, however, you require additional information, Dlease contact either of the undersigned at (415) 455-4991. Sincerely, Valentin Constantinescu, M.Sc. Hydrogeotogist and M . Registered Geologist VC / MAW: dr  ~~ ~h ~ DIRECTOR Ai~ eo~ c~ ~ DASD PRICE ~! ~ ~. ~ooY, ~o ~T~ D~OR ~ & ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ J~. ~CP, D~C~E ~RON~ENTAL H~L~ SER~CES DEPAR~ENT April 17, 1991 W.J. Callahan Union Carbide - Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 2678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location : 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 Known As : Union Carbide - Linde Division PERMIT # : 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described above has been determined by Kern County. Environmental Health Services Department to be the site of an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This notice is ecords indicate that you are a responsible party for this property. P b i= I= q 3 ~, 5 7. f= ~ must provide for all studies and work relating to the above-described Certified Mail Receipt ; oversight of these activities. California Health and Safety Code, Insurance Coverage Provided Lunty Ordinance Code, Chapter 8.48, require a determination of the ,~ Do not use for International Mail ............. (See Reverse) 3S a result of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PAlaT~ ~A,_,__~' ............... s,:,,~ t,, A RITI= ~.l~Am^~','"'", ..... ' '"'- .... ';=~" ' .... ------='-'--- ~ SENDER: Complete items 1 and ~when aaaitiona .* ' . - ' -. . ' -~' ' .. ;' ' "'~"~-L', ::~ :~'o-~d~iS will preCent tl~is card~ w 3 and 4. ' O O .... . ,, TO" Space on-the rever, s~?~.._a.e,-~,,~?~';; of-the person de'lixere~, t~.an_o C~ C ut your add .... ~_~t.h~e.,° '~;a lable. Consult post-lju0¥er t0r. reef :~ .om being ret?.rneu ~_u y = '~ ~ ollowmg suTv,,-~ - · ~ 04 . ~e date of dehve .~.~o~r~',, date. ~e~_~_' ..... ~:-'--'--' ' 2 ~ Reetr'Cct/~dr~D~l"very - <~ ~'om~d-;ii;;~;ed, and addressee's aaa, ..... ¢~r~ '-~ -;~ 1 I . ~ Show to wn (Extra charge/ ~~ Number ® = ddressed to: p q5 / nj . ~3c0 ..................... ~ype o~ Service: [] Ins,ired : ~ '~' ; W. J · Callahan [] Registered ~}[ ~ > o~ Union Carbide l~L.a []~.O~mae~ei,t 's West. Inc. ' ' a.i~ [] C: ~ O a < I' Linde Gases of the [] E~p,~Ss for~lerchandise o ~'O o ?.678 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 Alwa~y~...,.oEl~tainsignature0faddressse - ~.o ~ o San Ramon, CA 94583 or agen~nd DATE DELIVERED. -. ,oW.om .................................................. ~ ~~ ~ O O ~--Addressee ~ ~ ~ --Agent : . .' -~[,;.. -;. · o~ . ~.~ c~ c lc,' ~-~ . · .... -- ~ ~0~/ ~/~- -z,, ~, ~ ~, o~J~ ~ PS--Form 3811, Apr. 1989 .~S.~RO. 19~2~15___ DOMESTIC(~5)RETURN~z.3~6REC~P' F~: (~5) ~1-34~ RESUURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY  Environmental Health Set~ces Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STZV~ McC^,, ~'Y, Rr~S, O~U~CTOR DIRECTOR ^i, eo~u~o, co~.oi t~t~ DAVID PRICE 111 W~LUAM J. RODOY~ APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Plamung & Develo~m~ent Services Del0art~nent TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT March 20, 1991 Mr. W. J. Callahan Linde Gases of the West, Inc. 26?8 Bishop Drive, Suite 200 San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's Welding (Union Carbide) Permit #: 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: In reviewing the February 28, 1991, Remedial Action Plan prepared by Uriah, Inc. for the subject site, this Department has the following concerns/comments: 1. "~umo and ~reat" ~s an acceptable approach to remediate contaminated groundwater. However, for this specific site we need more information on the pumping system design to include but not limited to the input parameters for the SUTRA computer model and how these oarameters are determined. 2. Groundwater monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-5 have well screens of 20 feet each, from 20-40 feet for MW-3 and from 22-42 feet for MW-5. With the declining water table, (as of November 1990 water table is 38' below ground surface), the available drawdown is not adequate for these wells to sustain an effective pump and treat system. $. The use of MW-2 and MW-4 as injection wells is not allowed at ~his time. Anaiyticai data ~ndicated that the ~roundwater from these wells is contaminated. 4. The target clean-up levels for both soil and groundwater and the rationale for these levels must be provided. The proposed biotreatment method does not seem capable o~ treating the contaminated groundwater to drinking water standards. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNR% 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Mr. W. J. Caliahan Page Two March 20, 1991 5. Details of the vadose zone remediation, such as the injection system, method of controlling the transport/flow of the conditioned water and potential spreading of contaminants must be provided. 6. A soil boring is required to confirm the completion of vadose zone remediation. Please submit a written response to the above items by April 26, 1991, in order for us to complete our review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636 ext. 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Jack Becker, Uriah, inc. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY  Em, i~mmental Health ,Se~dce~ De~an~ment RANDALL L. ABBOTT ~ McCa: ~ ~'~, roms, ~nu~cro~ DIRECTOR ~r ~ c~ DASD PRICE ~1 ~ a. ~D9Y~ ~o ~!~ D~OR ~ & ~t ~ ~ J~, ~CP, D~C~R ~IRONMENTAL H~L~ SER~CES D~AR~ENT ~anua~ ~, 1001 Mr. W. ~. Gallahan ~nde Gases of ~he West, In~. ~678 Bishop Drive, Suite ~00 San ~mon, CA 04583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA ~own As: Baker's Welding (Union Carbide) Permit ~: 050033 Dear Mr. Callahan: We have reviewed the latest qua~erly groundwater monitoring repo~ (November, 1 prepared by Uriah Inc. for the subje~ site. ~e repo~ indicated the presence of g~otine ~ontamination in the groundwater still in significant levol& Two of the ~ix well~ (MW ~1 and are d~ due to the current drought conditions. In August, 1990, we approved the qua~erly groundwater monitoring as recommended by Uriah. At that time, we also required that at least three appropriate remediation alternatives be eva~uated for this site a~er sufficient data has been collected. We believe that there is now enough data, accordingly, please submit the required information by March 1, 1991. Enclosed is Kern Goun~ Handbook UT-3S for you~reference on our requirements (spe~caily page 8, ~3a to f and page 9, ~a and b). Fu~her, the qua~erly groundwater monitoring must be continued. If you have any questions regarding this ma~er, please call me at (805) e~ension 545. ~in~erely , Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas Enclosure cc: Jack Becker, Uriah Inc. Bob Turner, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board \050033.1tr ,,ha,, c-rot:itT <;! ~ITI: '~/'~ RAgFR.qFIFIr r). CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 RANDALL L. ABBOTT 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopier (805) 861-3429 STEVE Mc CALLEY Oi,ec,or RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES October 3, 1990 Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Subject: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's Welding (Union Carbide) Permit #: Dear Mr. Rohn: This letter is to remind you of the necessary deadlines for work required at the subject site. A review of our records showed that the quarterly groundwater monitoring results were due last September 8, 1990, as specified in our August 17, 1990, letter. To date, the results have not been received by this office. Please submit these monitoring results by October 12, 1990. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861- 3636. Sincerely, Oolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Eddy labet, Uriah, Inc. \050023.]tr RANDALL I_ ABBOTT 2700M $~eet, Sui~ 300 A~cy Oimc~w BMmr~kJ, CA 93~)1 (805) ~1-3602 .... .: :-: :.,, ,~ TMaMtmm (~05) 661-,313~ -' "~'- TMecopi~ (606) RESOURCE M NT AGENCY DEPARII~ · ~.:MEI~q'AL August 17, 1990 Mr. Sam Rohn Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Baker's We/ding (Un/on Carbide) Permit #: 050033 Dear Mr. Rohn: We have reviewed the June 15, 1990, site characterization report prepared by Uriah, Inc. for the subject site. The report confirmed the presence of gasoline contamination in the soil and groundwater beneath this property. The vadose zone plume has been adequately assessed but not the groundwater. Uriah, Inc. recommended quarterly monitoring of all the wells in order to determine the contaminant plume over time and to assist with the calibration of a model. They further recommended that if remediation becomes necessary, the soil and groundwater will be remediated using an in-situ bioremediation system. This Department concurs with Uriah's recommendation to monitor the wells on a quarterly basis at this time. After sufficient data is collected, we require that at least three appropriate remediation alternatives be evaluated for this site. The costs and risks associated with each alternative must also be discussed. We would like to remind you that all reports regarding this investigation must be submitted to this Department for our review and approval. A copy of all reports must also be submitted to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Enclosed is the revised Kern County Handbook UT-35 for your reference on our stte'charactertzatton/remedtatton requirements. Sa~ Rohn Page TWo August 170 1990 Please submit the quarterly monitoring results 30 days after sample retrieval. If you have anyquestions regarding this a after, please call me at (805) 861-3636 ext. 545. Sincerely, Dolores Hazardous Hater~als Special,st Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:Jg cc: Eddy Tabet, Uriah Inc. (w/ enclosure) Bob Turner, Central Valley RWQCB (w/o enclosure) GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Sulle 300 A~ency Director Bakerllteld, CA 03301 (805) 861-3502 .... ....... Telephone (805) 061.3636 STEVE McCALLEY ~.~?' -' '-.r-.... Telecopler (005) 801-3429 Director R E S O U R C E ~ ~iE N T A G E N C Y DEPART:i~ii. , .i,~MENTAL April 5, 1990 Sam Rohn Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94538 Subject: Underground Tank Site Assessment, Union Carbide (Baker's Welding), 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Permit No: 050033 Dear Mr. Rohn: We have reviewed the March 28, 1990, "Recommendations for completion of Site Characterization" prepared by Uriah Inc. for the subject site. This Department concurs with Uriah's recommendations. The proposal to install additional monitoring wells is approved and must be completed by June 1, 1990. An application form for the wells is enclosed. In addition to the proposed work, we require that samples from the existing wells be retrieved and analyzed during this phase of the investigation. Prior to starting work, please notify this office so that a convenient time can be arranged for a representative from this Department to witness/inspect site activities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores Oough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cd cc: Walter Floyd, Uriah Inc. Bob Turner, Central Valley, RWQCB dolores\rohn.let GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Baker,field, CA 93301 (805) 861.3502 . .~.~:~.7..~.~_~.~.;/.:~ Telephone (805) 861-383~ STEVE McCALLEY .."C "'- ~-.~-:~.. Telecoplef (805) 861-3429 o,..,o, RESOURCE ..E N T AGENCY DEPART~MENTAL March [3, 1990 Sam Rohn Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94538 SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Assessment, Union Carbide (Baker's Welding), 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA PERMIT NO.: 050033 Dear Mr. Rohn: We have reviewed the site characterization report prepared by Uriah Inc. for the subject site. The report presented the following information: 1. Three soil borings were drilled to groundwater then completed into monitoring wells to determine the extent of soil and groundwater contamination. 2. Groundwater was encountered between 2?.0 - 28.5 feet in each of the borings..The flow was determined to be south 30 degrees west. 3. Two of the wells (MW-2 and MW-3) had concentrations of benzene above drinking water standards. 4. Gasoline contamination was found in the soil retrieved from boring LB3 (MW-3) to a depth of 28 feet. No gasoline contamination was detected in borings BKI(MW-1) and BK2(MW-2). 5. No recommendations were provided regarding additional work to investigate the full extent of soil and groundwater contamination and/or remedial action options appropriate for this site. Sam Rohn Page Two March 13, 1990 Please submit item #5 by April 2, 1990, so we can complete our review. Further, please: a) show the problem area tn a figure (drawing), and b) provide the calculated groundwater gradient. Refer to Attachment "A" (Kern County Handbook UT-35) for our requirements on site characterization reports. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores 6ough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:Jg enclosure cc: Nalter Floyd, Uriah, Inc. Bob Turner, CVRNQCB WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY UST CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: S SUBSTANCE: 8006619 SITE NO: 050033 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y SITE NAME: UNION CARBIDE DATE REPORTED: 09/29/88 ADDRESS: 3505 PIERCE ROAD DATE CONFIRMED: 09/29/88 CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CATEGORY: R SITE STATUS CASE TYPE: G CONTRACT STATUS: 5 EMERGENCY RESPONSE: RP SEARCH: S DATE UNDERWAY: 09/29/88 DATE COMPLETED: 09/29/88 PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: 10/05/88 DATE COMPLETED: 06/04/89 ASSESSMENT: C REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: 06/05/89 DATE COMPLETED: / / INVESTIGATION: U REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: / ? DATE COMPLETED: / / POST REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED: ACTION MONITORING ENFORCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN: TAKEN: RAP REQUIRED: DATE APPROVED: CASE CLOSED: DATE CLOSED: / / DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: RESPONSIBLE PARTY CONTACT NAME: THOMA$--Dr--FR'~N~EN SPECIALIST: 9 COMPANY NAME: BAY~X--I~. SENSITIVITY: EES ADDRESS: ~ VERIFIED (X) CITY/STATE: O~ DATE OF REPORT: 12/18/89 GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 . ~lephon~805) 861-3636 ." ,: . ~lecopier {805) 861-3429 STEVE Mc CALLEY Oire~o, R E S O U R C E MA N'A G Ei.M'E N T A G E N C Y DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL · HEALTH SERVICES September 29, 1989 Sam Rohn Union Carbide - Linde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94538 SUBJECT: Site Characterization Proposal for Union Carbide (Baker's Welding), 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA PERMIT #050033 Dear Mr. Rohn: This Department has reviewed Uriah's response to our concerns on the site characterization workplan for the subject site. The groundwater sampling methodology that is approved by this Department is as described in 4b #3. One monitoring well shall be placed upgradient and the other well shall be placed downgradient. Additional borings (if necessary) can be decided on site by Uriah's staff professional with the concurrence of a representative from this Department. It is required that the existing well be sampled and analyzed for gasoline constituents. The site specific gradient must also be determined during this phase of the investigation. The workplan must be implemented within 30 days from the date of this letter. Please 1) obtain all necessary permits and 2) provide 48 hours notice prior to the commencement of work for this phase of the investigation. After all samples have been retrieved and analyzed, a report prepared per Kern County Handbook UT-35 guidelines must be submitted to this office within 60 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Walter Floyd, Uriah Bob Turner, CVRWQCB Uriah Inc. An Environmental Services Company September 18, 1989 Ms. Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Site Characterization Proposal For 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit ~050033) Dear Ms. Gough: I am in receipt of a copy of your letter to Mr. Sam Rohn dated September 5, 1989 concerning Uriah's proposal of May 22, 1989. The following is presented in response to your concerns: 1) In June, 1988, staff of Krazan & Associates, Inc. advanced a boring in the area of the underground fuel storage tank pit- the area believed to be adjacent to the source of the fuel hydrocarbon release. Analysis of the soils from this boring (MW-A) revealed contaminants in soil at a depth of twenty feet; however, no contamination was detected at a depth of fifteen feet. This suggests that the permeable sands, silty sands, and gravels encountered in the area allowed the contaminants to migrate downwards without significant sorption or lateral and transverse dispersion. This conclusion is further supported by data acquired at Krazan boring #B-1 which was located approximately fifteen feet to the northwest (in the presumed down gradient direction). Analysis of soil samples from this boring failed to reveal detectable levels of target contaminants The conclusion drawn from Krazan's work is that contaminants migrate down through the soil column to ground water without significant lateral migration and that it is, therefore, the groundwater which is the media likely to both contain the bulk of contamination and determine the pattern of significant migration. With this in mind, Uriah developed its proposal, 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 placing borings in a pattern which might reasonably be expected to intercept migrating contaminants realizing that groundwater gradient is believed to change seasonally. 2) Krazan & Associates presented and developed data concerning' im groundwater gradient on Pages 3, 4, 5, and 12 of their June 16, 1988 report. While additional work could be done to determine gradient at this time, the data t~us~cqulred would ~ikely be repetitious~ It is also proposed that a determination ~'o~-otne~'~qulzer characteristics (e.g. storage capacity, hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity) would be an unnecessary financial burden upon our client until such time as the primary aspects of the site characterization, i.e. the full assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of contamination and an analysis of the potential threats to groundwater, the environ- ment, and the public health and safety are determined. 3) Uriah was not provided with current groundwater monitoring well sampling data. Should there be no recent sampling of the well, and/or upon your request, the existing well will be sampled and analyses conducted in accordance with the protocol described within Uriah's proposal. 4a) If free product is present within groundwater samples acquired from the proposed borings and/or the existing ground water monitoring well, gasoline sensitive paste will be placed upon the graduated tape of an electronic water level meter. The tape will be lowered to a depth below the water surface, then withdrawn and the thickness of free product measured and recorded. The volume of free product brought to the surface is expected not to exceed two liters. This material would be transferred to amber glass sampling bottles, sealed, labeled, placed on blue ice and transported to a certified hazardous waste analytical laboratory for possible data acquisition concerning existing and potential chemical and biological degradation potentials. 4b) As indicated within Paragraph #2 within the Scope of Work section of Uriah's proposal, it is proposed that a grab water sample be collected from each boring using a clean bailer lowered down into the boring below the water surface. Should sloughing of soil from the walls of the boring(s) preclude direct acquisition of water samples, it is proposed that samples be acquired in accordance with one of the following alternatives: 1) Via bailer lowered through the hollow stem of the drilling auger. 2) Via bailer following the temporary placement of well casing within the bore hole. .~!~?)i; Via monitoring well should their placement prove necessary. Here, two appropriate borings would be converted to groundwater monitoring wells and the number of soil borings reduced in order to conform with budgetary constaints set forth for this project. Subsequent to its acquisition, each water sample would be transferred to two Volatile Organics Analysis (VOA) vials. These would be promptly sealed with teflon-lined screw caps, labeled, and placed on blue ice. It is requested that the decision for the conversion of selected soil borings be left to the discretion of the on site Uriah. staff professional in consideration of conditions encountered during the work described. Thank you for your assistance to date. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact me at (415) 455- 4991. Sincerely, Walter Floyd Project Geologist WF:ms cc: Mr. Sam Rohn Union Carbide- Linde Division GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (808) 861-3502 , ,-'"' ~ ""; r r::~'' Telephone (805) 861-3636 ~-~~.' Telecopler (805) 861-3429 STEVE McCALLEY ~~.._.~<~"" ~ ~'~ '~? Dlreclor R ESOU RCE ~~~E.NT AG ENCY DEPA ' E,~.I~T '~.?~E.~ ~.~IRONMENTAL H E~H~*~EFt~ICES September 5, 1989 I Union Carbide - T.~nde Division 2420 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 A~TN: Sam Rohn Subject: Location: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Union Carbide (Baker' s Welding) Permit ~: 050033 This Department has reviewed the site characterization workplan prepared by Uriah Inc. for the subject site. Approval of the w~rkplan cannot be granted until the following concerns are adequately addressed: 1. The rationale for the number and locations of soil borings (which will also be used for groundwater sampling) was not clearly described. 2. The method of determining aquifer characteristics such as hydraulic conductivity and groundwater gradient was not provided. 3. Will the existing monitoring well be sampled or utilized in the determination of groundwater gradient in this phase of the investigation? 4. Regarding the groundwater sampling methodology, the following must be addressed: a) the sampling/handling of free floating prcduct (if any) b) the method of retrieving a representative groundwater sample It is highly recommended that selected soil borings be completed to monitoring ~lls for better sampling, for determination of certain' aquifer characteristics and for use in-future/additional workthat may be reqp~red. Union Carbide - Linde Division September 5, 1989 Page 2 All the above items must be addressed andsut~ttedtothis office within 30 days from the date of this letter.'Enclosed is Attachment "A" (Kern County HanclbookUT-35) for reference on our site characterization requirements. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. ~ Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG: cas cc: Walter Floyd, Uriah, Inc. Bob Turner, Central Regional Water Q3~]ity Control Board \union-car. ltr Uriah Inc. An Environmental Services Company August 11, 1989 MS. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental Health 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Ms. Gough: As referenced within our telephone conversation of this after- noon, I am writing to confirm that Mr. Eddy Tabet, California Registered Professional Engineer (Civil) #43041, has significant experience in environmental matters. As indicated within para- graph 3 of Mr. Tabet's resume, and on the sample soil boring log appearing within Appendix A of Uriah's proposal of May 22, 1989, much of Mr. Tabet's work involves site assessment, characterization, remediation, and related work appropriate to the engineering and geological aspects of the environmental services field. Also, as indicated, Mr. Tabet performs these services for the Accutite Division of the Olympian Oil Company, for Uriah, and as Tabet Engineering Services. Mr. Tabet has overseen twenty or more projects for Uriah and is recognized by numerous regulatory agencies as a skilled and experienced environmental services professional. I trust that the information provided herein is an adequate response to your inquiry. If, however, you require additional information, or if I may otherwise be of assistance, please contact me at (415) 455-4991. S%n~erely, ~ John E. Rapp Senior Consultant- President, Uriah, Inc. AUg A 989 ENVt i:'-', 0 N MENTAL 464 Lindbergh Avenue · Livermore, California 94550 · (415) 455-4991 KERN COUNTY 2700 '~' $~reeT. $~e. 300 8akersf~eid. CA 93301 Fmvi.,-otmenGl. L (805) 861-3636 March 31, 1989 Mr. Thomas D. Franken Bayox Inc., Division of Union Carbide 2863 Cypress Oakland, California Sub3ect: Location - 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA. Known As - Union Carbide Permit # - A755-05 Dear Mr. Franken: The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for work required at the property described above. As a responsible party for the leaking underground storage tank, you have previously received a letter from this Department notifying you of the required work necessary to identify the extent of the contamination. We are now requesting that this work, outlined in UT35, be done in a timely manner. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48, the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department requires a determination of the threat to the environment. Accordingly, you must select an environmental contractor and submit a site characterization workplan proposal to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. The workplan must be approved by this Department before any work is started. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Environmental Health ~cialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program AEG:cas green\deadlines.rrm .~SENDER: Complete items I and 2 when.mldltlonel ~ervic. ere dNIred, and complete It~s 3 ana 4. ~-- Put your addrm In the "RETURN TO" S~e r~ ~id~ Feilu~ ~ do ~1~ will ar~ cer~ from ~lng r~rn~ to you. The r~rn r~elot f~ will orovlde you ~e name of delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional f~ ~e followl~ ~W~ I~ lvllllbl[ Con. It ~aster for fe~ and ch~k box(~) for additional ~lcl~l) r~u~. ~,. ~ Show to whom dellver~, date, and addr~'~ addr~ 2. O R~r~ 3. A~icleAdd~to: E00 ~ 4. ~i~Nu~r  AI~y~ ~n ~m of ~ 5. Signature -- Addm~ 8. Addr~'~ A~ (0~ Y X re~t~ a~ fee 16. ,?'-nature -- A~n~, ~, PS Fo~ ~ 1: ~. 1987 . ~S,~EO. 1987.17~2~ D~E~IC RE~N RECEI~ OFFICIAL BUSINE~ ~ ,-:,.~l~j;: ~.., :'~1~1~; '~:'~ ". L..~' the~e~. ' .... ~': .:" '," L.~"~'~.:, :,;~..,;{": o . ~ · , .... ' ~1~ · Endo~ .Ficl. ' n.um R.i~* · .,' vtHUNMENTAL R~u~ adj~ent to numar. '; '. '*~*',,, ~.:,, . -, - . ~' · RETURN Print ~n~r's name, add~, and ZIP ~e in the ~m ~low. TO - ~nvi~o~me~tal Xealth Department 2700 "~" Street, Ste 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 KERN COUNTY 2700 'M' Street, Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA93301 Environmen'ca/He~ Depar~meng (805) 861-3636 ~ February 7, 1989 Mr. Thomas D. Franken Bayo× Inc., Division of Union carbide 2863 Cypress Oakland, CA SUBJECT: LocaCion: 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA Known As: Union Carbide PER~IT #: 50033 Dear Mr. Thomas D. Franken: This leccer is an official nocice co inform you chac che proper~y described above has been decermined by Kern ~ouncy Environmencal RealCh co be che sice of an unauchorized release of hazardous m~Cerials from an under~round scora~e This nocice is senc co you because our records indicace chaC you are responsible parcy ~or Chis propercy. As a responsible parCy, you musC provide ~or all sCudies and work relaCin~ Co Che above described propercy and Che ¢osC for oversi~hc of Chese California RealCh and SafeCy ~ode ~hapcer 6.? and Kern Councy Ordinance ~ode Chapcer 8.48 requi~e a deCerminaCion of che chreac ~o che environmenC as a resulC of chis release. TRE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SflALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CflARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL A~TION PLAN FOR KERN ENVIRO~ENTAL REALTR'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE TRE WOP~ IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find aCCachmenc "A", Randbook UT-35, which s~aces che minimum required siCe workplan a¢~ivicies, Che necessary ~equiremenCs for sele¢Cin§ environmenCal ¢onCra¢Cors-qualified co perform chis work~ a §lossary of Cerms, example illus~racions, and a se¢cion discussin~ ~he answers ~o commonly asked quescions. A¢¢ordin~ ~o che criteria lisced below and in ACcachmenC "~", your sice has been desi~naced as environmencally sensicive. Ail environmencally sensiCive sices are aucomacically enrolled in~o a Scace ¢oncracc pro,ram for recovery of oversi~hc ¢oscs. The environmencal sensi~ivicy criceria for sices are as follows: 1. Ri~hesc hisco~i¢ ~round wacer is within 100 ~eec ~round surface, or 2.Nearesc surface waCer in unlined conveyance is w~hin 75 feec of cank(s), or 3. Nearesc a§riculCural or domescic wacer well is wichin 75 feec of canks(s), or 4. Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge area, or 5. Permitting Authority determines possible adverse environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique wildlife habitat areas. The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs will be recovered by Kern County Environmental Health under the terms of the State contract described below. This contract ONLY pertains to costs associated with oversight. STATE CONTRACT The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site. Accordingly, Attachment "D", the will serve as the official notification of enrollment into the State Contract. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative Officer Environmental Health attachments KERN COUNTY 2700 'M' Street. Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA93301 EnvironmenTalHe~hDepa.,-cment ATTACHMENT "D" (805) 861-9636 February 7, 1989 Mr. Thomas D. Franken Bayox Inc., Division of Union Carbide 2863 Cypress Oakland, CA SUBJECT: Location: 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA Known As: Union Carbide PERMIT #: 50033 Dear Mr. Thomas D. Franken: This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below: Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of o~erseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(ies) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative ~Officer Environmental Health attachments ,~N ~ 0 19~9 LABORATORIES, PE~'ROZEI. IM J' J' ~LIN, E~. CHEM. ENGR. bm,~NMENTAL HEALT 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 9330~ PHONE 327-4911 Petrole,mm Hydrocarbons SOIL) North Cal Construction Date of P. O. Box 588 Report: 30-Dec-88 Attention,Richard Raso ~~~~.~:~',~. Lab No.: 9579-1 h ~-~ Sample Desc.: Soil Sample \_,, COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTRACTED: 28-Dec-88 29-Dec-88 29-Dec-88 Reporting Analysis Constituent Units Results Benzene ug/g Nene Detected O, 10 Toluene 'ug/g None Detected O. 10 Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected O. 10 p-Xylene ug/g None Detected O. 10 m-Xylene ug/g None Detected O. lO o-Xylene ug/g None Detected O. 10 Isopropyl benzene ug/g None Detected O. 10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 1646. O0 10. O0 Total Pet. Hyd~arbons ug/g 1646. O0 O. 10 TEST METHOD: C~alifornia State D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Diesel (Carbon Disulfide Extraction) Dry Matter Basis PETROLE[~ HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petrole~0 hydrocarbons utilizing a diesel standard. As outliner] by the California D.O.H.S. These petroleum ?~drocarbons are in addition to the cor~tituents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLE[~ HYDROCARBONS: The s,~, total of all constiO~ents on this report. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ,. ;... , . . By ~J.//~. ]~.A~.{n~' Rof~rt Plaisance Chem~ st NORTH CAL CONSTRUCTION ,:¥o,'ect;ng t,,e En,,i,'onn',ent P. O. Box 588 Stockton, CA 95201 209/465-5886 Genera/Engineering C/ass A License No. 505704 September 29, 1988 Kern County Health Department Division of environmental Health' 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA. 93305 Attention: Amy Green Dear Amy Creen: Please review attached soils analysis we had MP Vacuum obtain for us at Baker's Welding location 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. I have been talking to our customer, the owner-representative, about our next steps. They would rather chase out the contaminated soil now while the tank hole is semi open. I will contact you by telephone regarding this. Since~!y~, ¥' // Robert ~. Noye~/ Vice President/Ceneral Nanager R~N/sds Enclosures P.O. Box 7237 Ca[3istrano Beacl% CA 9262,~-7237 714/493-3994 Client Name: MP Vacuum Truck Service Address : 3400 N. Manor St. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Date samples received : 9-15-88 Date analysis completed: 9-20-R8 Date of report : 9-20-88 Laboratory No. 2007 through 20~O. Pro'-~c3~ .... t,: Baker %,:elding RESULTS OF ANALYSIS ~2007 ID: 1-N-2' ',~gm/gm >IRt., ugm/gm Benzene 22 0 To [uene 4Or) Ethylbenzene 90 0 .l p-Xylene i3() 0 i~ l m-Xy lene 3°" o-Xv[ene 170 ~? I) l I sopropylbenzene 5.2 0 l TVI{ (Gasoline) t,2()0 i. 0 'l'?tt (t)iese] ND Nethod of Analysis: Ca[i fornJ, a l)()lt.% i~[JFT manual MRL = Minimum Reporting t,evet TVH = Total Vot. ati le [lydrocarbons TPH = Total Petroleum tly;trocar'bon~ ugm/gm = micro,rams per' gram NI) = Not. de, eot. ed St'.an ( omer 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakemfield, CA 93380 Laboratory No. 2007 through 2010 Project.: Baker We.lding RESUI,TS OF ANAi.YSIS =201() ID: 4-S-6' ugm/'~m H[~[,,ugm/gm Benzene NI,' 0 1 Toluene N£; 0 1 Ethyl. benzene NI') 0 1 p-Xylene qD 0 1 m-Xyl ene ND 0 o-Xyl ene. ND 0 1 Isopropylbenzene ND 0 1 'I'VH kGasotinel 5ii; I TPII {Diesel) ND 10 Hethod of Analysis: C'atit'ornia i.'.;;IIS I,iil,'f' manual MRL = Minimum Reporting Level TVII = Total Volatile lly~tr,,earbons. TPH = Total Pet. rolet~m ilydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms par. gram NI) = Not detecked RES~.:I,TS OF A~ALYS]g Benzene To I uene Ethyl benzene p-Xy Lene m-Xvi ene o-Xy i I ~opropy.l benz~ne TVit (Gnsoline) TPlt (Dieael) ,% t;t r) (. !RN COUNTY HEAL.TH DEPARTME4 2700 M Street HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Mailing Address: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 861-3636 SePtember 16, 1988 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Attn: Bill Pfister 3614 E. Ashland Fresno, CA 93726 Re: Groundwater Contamination detected at Baker's Welding and Supply, 3505 Pierce Rd., in Bakersfield, CA associated with a release from a 10,000 gallon underground fuel tank. Dear Mr. Pfister: The facility known as Baker's Welding and Supply, located at 3505 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, California, has completed an investigation which showed the presence of ppb levels of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater supplies beneath the facility. The foiiow~ng is a discussion of all work completed at this site: 1. Baker's Welding and Supply had one iO,0O0 gallon underground gasoline tank at their facility at 3505 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, California. The tank was t~ghtness tested a year ago. 2. A service station equipment company discovered fuel in the manway around the submersible pump on the tank on 12-28-87. They pumped the fuel out and removed some of the contaminated soil. They suspected that the fuel was leaking out of a union attached to the submersible pump. 3. A representative of the Kern County Health Department found fuel odors emitting from the manway which housed the submersible pump, when inspecting the facility. 4. The facility was ordered to repair the leaking union, and determine the lateral and vertical extent of contamination in the soil, around the tank. r31~TRI~T (31:: F lC. F .~ Bill Pfister September Page 2 5. The tank site was assessed utilizing one boring (B-l) and one monitoring well (MW-A). B-1 was sited east of the tank. MWA was drilled just north of the submersible pump. 6. Petroleum Hydrocarbons were detected in the soil retrieved from the monitoring well (20 feet below grade) and in the water sample retrieved from the well. The water sample contained 35.7 ppb Benzene, 33.9 ppb Toluene, 88.6 ppb Xylenes, and 615 ppb total purgeable hydrocarbons. A copy of the initial site characterization report was sent to the- regional board by Krazan and Associates. The underground fuel tank was removed on September 15, 1988, and four soil samples were retrieved beneath the tank to be analyzed for BTX and TPH. A copy of the lab results will be sent to your agency as soon as they are received. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636. Environmental Health Division AG/dr 011-88 170OFIowm~Sl~e~ COUNTY HEALTH'0EPARTlUlEiI ~~Efl ~, C~ 9~ ~ M ~. M.~ ~ 1~) ~ I-~ E~ON~N~L H~ ~RE~ OF EN~R~MEN~ H~ ~aclllty N~e Kern Co~ty.'P. ermlt , ,_ This form ia to be returned to the Kern County Health D~partment within 14 days of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling facility. The holder of the permit with number noted above la responsible for insuring that this form l, completed and returned. Section I - To be filled out b~ tank removal contractor: Tank Re,oval Contractor: ~ 0~ (~.c~ Date Tanks Removed ~-~- ~ No. or Tanks ~ctA~ 2 - T~ b~ tilled out ~ contractor "decontamlnattn; tank(s): T,~ ",econtulnatlon' Contractor ~ ~ ~/A ~ ~ %~, ~ ~ Au~horized representative of coa~rac~or certifies b~ sl~nio~ below t~(a) have been decon~olnated la accordanco with Kern Co~tF Bealth ~e~r taent requireaen~ Slgna~ Title ~ctlon 3 -To be [llled ou~ and sl~ned ~ a~ authorized repreaentatlve of the ,$reatment. storage, or disposal ~aclllty accepttn~ tank(s): Date Tanks Received /~ ~ ~--~ No. of Tanks Si,nature ~~ ~~~ Title (Authorized Repreaen~tive) * · * ~ILING INSTRUCTIONS: Fold In half and staple. Postage and mailing label have already been affixed to outside for your convenience. (Form · 284, ~IETAL / . Ji'IECYCLING. INC.~/ TANK DISPOSAL FORM' 202 South Milliken Avenue Date: /~_.). ~ ~.. ,19 mtario, CA 91761 Job ~ - ~14) 947-2888 RO.~ '." -. .. CONTRACTOR: ~ O ~ ~ ~- ~ L. ~ -~ ..". ADD~ESS: ~s~m~o~: A.M.R. 2202 S. Milliken Ave., Ontario, CA 91761 )*TE ITI.E I PROJECIED TANKS I ORDERED BY: I LIC. NO. ~J (V~ TIME IN: ~PECIALINSTRUCTIONS:~ TIME OU~ J Services Rendered Cost _ Disposal Fee 100.00 TANKS RECEIVED QTY. GALLONS TYPE NET TONS TOTAL ._ Extensive Loading Time 150.00 F' S' 280 [] [] .14 _._ Disposal Fee with Permit 250.00 500 ~ E~ .21 550 Q E] .24 ___ Fiberglass Tank Disposal Fee Per Tank 400.00 1000.12 ft. Lq [] .44 1000-6 ft. [] E0 .61 __ Delivered 200.00 1500 iq [] .87 2000 ~ r_3 .97 2500 [] [] 1.14 __ Bobtail Disposal Fee 250.00 3000 [] [] 1.32 4000 ~ [] ~ 1.64 __ Cancellation Fee/~.]/,~>~ ~ 250.00 / 5000 ,~ ..~ 2.42 . 6000 [] TOTAL CHARGES $ ~ 7500 [] r~ 3.26 · 8000 L~ ~ 3.44 9000 ~ ~/ 3.82 ,1~ fees incurred are per load unless specified, j/ 10000 [] erms are net 30 days from date of invoice. 12000 r~ E3 4.93 ontractor's signature represents acceptance terms for payment, and confirms that tank NO. OF TANKS TOTAL NET TONS ?moral complies with State laws. 'F--FIBERGLASS CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE i .... CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL I DESTRUCTION !S IS TO CERTIFY THE RECEIPT ANO ACCEPTANCE OF THE TANK{S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY DESTROYED FOR SCRAP PURPOSES ONLY. - AUTH(~'RIZED~ER ,~ DATE CONTRACTOR COPY ~700 F~ow~ St~! ~ERN COUNTY HEALTH-~EPARTMEI~ ~.'m ~, talkie ~ ~ M ~, M.D. ~ (~5) ~1-~ E~RONME~ H~ ~ ~RE~ OF EN~ME~ H~ Facility H~e Kern Co~tY~er=tt * * UNDERGROUND T~K DISPOSITION T~CKING RECO~ * * This for= la to be returned to the Kern County Health Departsent within 14 ' days of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recyclln8 facility. The holder of the per=it with nu=ber noted above Is responsible ~or lnsurtn~ that this ~or~ is co=p]eted and returned. 9ectlon ~ - To be ~]]ed out ~ tank removal contractor: Tank Re,oval Contractor: ~ ~ Address ~'~- ~ ~ Phone t(~J Date Tanks Removed ~-~- ~ No. of Tanks ~ction 2 - T~ b~ filled out ~ contractor 'decontaslnatin~ tank(s): Tank 'Deco~t~lnatlon" Contractor ~ ~ ~/~ ~~ ~~ Address ~~ ~.~o~ ~~ Phone , ~o~ ~-. Authorized representative of contractor ~ertifies by si~nin~ ~elow t~(s) have been decon~tn~ted tn accordance with Kern Co~t~ ~ealth ~epar taent reqoireneo~ ....... & ....... ................ ......... 8~tlo~ $ -To be ~llled out and ~l~n~d ~ a~ authorized ~epr~nt~tlve of the treatment, ~tora~e, o~ disposal fa~tltt~ ~eee~tln~ ~ank{~}: Date Tanks Received /~-~--~.~ NO. o~ Tanks (Authorized Representative) * * * ~ILING INSTRUCTIONS: Fold tn half and staple. Postage and mailing label have already been affixed to outside for your convenience. (For~ ~H~P-150) Ol~l~ OF~CES 2?00 M STREET K'~N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME/ .~A.~ O.~=,C,~. MAILING ADDRESS Leon M Hebertso~, M.D. 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 * DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL *I.~EALTH ,"~ ' ' :- ~ " · ' · ~~/ . ~'-~-' .~ _:~"~',';~"~'~.~? a; :~?.~:?~ ::' ~.~,r :.'A":'.; '" ~ACILI~ ~/~D~SS: ~(S) ~/~D~S: .CO~~:~. ~ Union Ca,bide Bayox Inc. No,th c"i~(*~-nSt~uctton 3535 Pierce Road Division of Union 'Carbide P.O.-Box"588 Bakersfield, CA 2863 Cypress Stockton'; .CA' 95201 Oakland, CA. _ .,.~... - .. License .No; 505704 Phone t(805} 327-5336 Phone t(i09) 465-5886 PERIilT FOR CLOSURE OF PERNIT EXPIRES November 3~ 1988 I TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE August 3, 1988 .................... POST ON PREMI ................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW: 1. It Is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work. 2. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating closure action. 3. Tank closure activities ~ust be per Kern County Health and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handout SUT-30. 4. A ~n~u~ of four samples must be retrieved one-third of the ~ay In fro~ the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and slx feet. 5. All leaded/unleaded gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. 5. if any contractors or dlsposal facilities other than those on permit and permlt appllcation are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the specialist listed on the permit. 7. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Health Department within five days of waste disposal, DISTRICT OFFICES 8. All applicable state laws for hazardous waste waste disposal, transportation, or treatment ~us~ be adhered to. The Kern County Health Departnent nust be notified before novlng and/or disposing of any contaminated soil. 9. Perlttt~e ts responsible for ~akln~ sure that "tank disposition tracking 10 ~dvl~ thl~ office of the tll~ ~nd d~te of the propo~d ~a~plln~ ~lth ~1 hour~ ~dv~nce notice. NORTH CAL CONSTRUCTION Protect n t ,e E,,viro.me.t P. O. Box 588 Stockton, CA 95201 209/465-5886 General Engineering C/ass A License No. 505704 August 1, 1988 Kern County Health Department Division of Environmental Health 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Dear Mrs. Green: Enclosed is a copy of the Application for Permit to remove underground fuel tank located at: 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield. Please note the change and additional information. Change: Section "E" now reads, M&~ Vacuum Service. Change to read, M&P Vacuum Service. Additional Information: 1. Tank rinse to be diposed of at Gibson Refineries. 2. The tank to be disposed of at A.M.R. in Ontario. Respectfully submitted, Thomas D. Franken Superintendent TDF/bm Encl. KERN COUNTY RP~LTH OEPAR.TMENT r~u '., . ' .PTA / 1'100 FLOHER STREET, ~ERSeIE~. ~ 93305 ~ OP T~ ~ BE ~O ~805) 861-3636 ~ oF PIPl~ ~ ~N APPLZ CATT ON FOE PERMT T FOR PI~RI~ENT CLOSURI~/~O~B,d~LNDOL%TI~[ENT OIF t.TNDBRGROUL%TI:) HAZ,d~RDOUS SUBST,d~LL%TCES STORAGE FACT LT TY APPLICATION I$ FOR [] RENOVAL. OR [] ABANDONMENT IN PLACE (PILL OUT ON~ APPLICATION PER L~ACILITY) THIS PROJECT CONTACT IPH°NE · ,~C..~q X/6,..~',5'~, IBBC/T/R (RURAL' LOCATIONS ONLY) ] DAY~- ~ e~v,c co~e ~s ~o I I~UD~ ~RO~S~ PROJE~ ~ING ~ ~IFO~IA LIC~SE J ~R~'S COMP~TION · [INS~ I ~RKKR' S CONPEN~TION ~ INS~ER PHO~ cH~zcAL CON~SZ~ZON Or ~TER~ S~RED  ;TANK ~ VOL~B ~I~ ~ (~N-~ClAL N~) ~ ~R~ ~I~ PR~IOUSLY ~ / WATER TO FACILITY PROVIDED BY IDEPTH TO GROUNDWATER ~. NEAREST WATER WELL - GIVE DISTANCE ~ DESCRIBE TYPE Ill J~ITHIN 800 FEET IS0IL TYPE AT FACILITY BASIS FOR SOIL TYPE AND GROUNDWATER DEPTH DETERMINATION TOTAL NUMBER 01~ SAMPLES TO BE ANALYZED SAMPLpq NILL BE ANALYZED FOR: :-,>:.. DESCRIBE RO~ RESIDUE IN TANK(S) AND PIPING IS TO BE RKNOVED AND DISPOSED 0P (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COMPANIES): ~ oescRh~i:' ~oTH THE DISPOSAL METHOD AND DISPOSAL LOCATION "FOR: TANKIS) PIPING - s PLEASE PROVIDE INPORIttTION RRQU~ST~D ON RSVSRSP. SIU~, O._~r THIS SHEET BEPORE SUBB(ITTINO APPLICATION ~OR REVIEW THIS FORN HAS 8EEN COMPLETHD UNDER PENALTY OP PERJURY AND TO THE BESTOP NY KNOffLEDOE IS TRU~ AND CORRECT. / · (FO~l ·HMNP-140) >m,:,~"LMIF..P,~?;t~PT. BAEERSPIELD. CA g33os J# OP TANKS TO BE ABAHn"?"IED I /,~BBa~-3I~ ~LENGTH OP PIPING TO APPLZGATTON FOR PERM!T FOR PERlVS~NENT CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT O~' UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILTTy IS FOR ~-] REMOVAL. OR O ABANDONMENT IN PLACE (PILL OUT ONJ APPLICATION PER PACILITY) THIS APPLICATION --~:~.c;._. -~;~,,~UTc IIPNONEDAYSI' ,~C-',5,~, ,/y/(~,..:)~, ,~'((.,.~ ~*; ~ [SEC/T/R (RURAL LOCATIONS ONLY) ..I'T',~(~..~_4__; D. /:/~/1~/.'~'~',(/ INtO,Ts-.~o~? ~/ ONMER IADDRESS J PHONE O~-!N~.A~',' Sl~ ASSES~ ~Ol ADDRESS PHONE l Ng~ER PHOHE ~A~R" THAT MILL ANALYZE BANPLE9 ~DRB99 PHONE . ~ ~ ~ "," , / -~NK p VOL~E CH~ICAL S~RED. (NON-C0JERCIAL N~BJ DA~9 9~R~ CHEMI~L PR~IOUELY STORED ,~ .... To t JNAT£R TO PACILITY PROVIDED BY JDEPTR TO GRODNDILqTP..R :i:!..,,~ ~...EL.-- .,v, .,,,~, ,. D.c.,. ~, ,, .,..,, .oo ,,. J,o,~ ~ ,., ~,~,~  4/,4 I ~N~ '/ ~IS.;K~ SOIL ~PE ~ GROU~bATER DE~R O~TERMINATION ' i ~ER OP S~PL~S TO BE ~AL~ED ]S~PLES MILL BE ~ALY~ED ?,~. flOE RESIDUE IN T~K(S) ~O PIPING IS ~ 'BE R~O~D A~ DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE ~NS~KATION ~D DISPOSAL C~ANIES): ..~., PLEASE PROVIDE ]N~O~tlO~ REQUBsT8~ 0~ RB~RSB 9IDE 0P THIS :S:~.'~A$ BEEN C~PLETED ~ER PENAL~ O~ PERJURY AND ~ THE BEST OP ~ KNOMLBDOE I~ ~UE A~ CORRECT. .~/ / / -, ;~E ...... /.~~.~/- /~ .~ TITLE ~-r/.~ ~?~' DATE .. / / ~ l~-l~OJ UNDERGROUND STORAGE .TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAUINATION SIT~_ REPORT RGENCY ' REPORT BEEN FILED ? '-~ ,: ~ / YES ~E . -- - . ~. - ~. ,~" ~ ,~ ~ , , / ~ , v ~; OU~~ LOST (~N~ ~ U~N~ DA~ Old. RED Y ~W DI~D ~ IN~O~ ~R~~ o~RSU~RF~~~I~ ~~'~: NUI~ /"]~ ol D~ Zig : TANK'ST : TANK REMOVAL DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N ' ~ U~ USED m S~ DI~HA~ ~L ~f~ -- r .l .l 01 ol ~1 ~1~UN~°~ ~ ~VE~N~TS ~ R~ET~K ~ CL~T~K ~E~ ONEONLY ~ UNDE~RMINED ~ SOILONLY GROUNDWA~R ~ DRINKINOWAmR-lCHECKONLYIFWA~R~LLSHAVEACm~LYBEENAFFEC~D) CHE~ ONE ONLY Sl~ IN'ST[raTION IN PRmRESS (DEFIN~G E~m OF PROBmM) ~ Cm~ IN PR~RESS ~ SIGNED OFF (~mP mMPm~D OR uN~AR~ NO~TIONT~EN ~ POST ~NUP MONITORING IN P~ ~ ~FUN~AVA~mPR~ED ~ EV~UATI~C~UP~RNATI~S CHE~ ~PROPRIA~ ~T~N(S) (SEE B~K FOR ~TAI~) ~ C~SI~(CD) ~ EX~VA~&D~E(ED) ~ REMO~FREEPR~T(FP) ~ EN~EDBIO~G~ATION(I~ ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (~) ~ EX~VA~&T~AT(E~ ~ PUMP&TR~TGROUNDWA~R(G~ ~ REP~ES~Y(RS) ~ TR~ENTATH~P~U) ~ NO~T~ONREOU~D(NA) ~ O~ER(O~ ~ROOUCER TH~S CE.T~F~CATE ~S ~SSUED AS ~. TLR OF ~NFORMATIO. O.LY A.D CONFERS .O RIGHTS UPON THE CERT~FICA'mLDER. T.~S CERTIFICATE DOES .OT AME.D, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE"/I[I=FORDED BY THE POUCI~ BELOW. LO~NZI-~SASSO OF STOCKTON P.O. BOX 1847 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE STOCKTON, CA 95201 COMPANY (209) 466-1414 ~ER ~ CONTINENT~ INSU~CE CO~ COMPANY . INSURED ~R B ~~ NOR~ C~ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P.O. BOX 588 L~R ~ I~USTRI~ I~ITY STOCKTON, CA 95201 COMPANY ~E. D COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POMCY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER .~UMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE ~Y BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE iNSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE P~ICIES OESCRIBEO HEREIN iS SU~ECT TO ALL THE TERMS, ~CLUSIONS, AND CONO~ TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. ~LI~ EFFECTIVE ~LI~ E~I~TION TYPE OF INSU~NCE POLICY NUMBER ~TE (M~ DATE (M~D~ ALL LIMITS IN GENE~L LIABILITY ~ENE~L AGGRE~TE COMMERCIAL GENE~L LIABILI~' CBP6006602-87 11/5/87 7/15/88 ~ ~m ~E ~U~NCE PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY : 0~ER'~ & ~t~ ~ROTE~E EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE (ANY ONE FIRE) MEDICAL EXPENSE (~Y ONE PER.N) AU~OMOm~ A~Y AUT0 W~80942014 11/5/87 11/5/88 000 ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS ~GE LIABILI~ EXCESS LIABILITY OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS' COMPENSATION CB900-4991 4/1/88 4/1/89 $ 100 (EACH ACCIOENT~ AND $ 500 (DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ 1 O0 (DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATtONS/VEHICLES/RESTRIGTIONSISPEClAL ITEMS ALL CALIFORNIA OPERATIONS COUNTY OF KERN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX. BAKERSFIELD, CA PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESEI !RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEI~I HEALTH OFFICER 2700 M Street Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Mailing Address: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 861-3636 ~ay 5, 1988 Baker's Welding and Supply 3503 Pierce Road Bakersfield, California 93308 Attn: Hark Cooper Re: Site Characterization Proposal Dear Mr. Cooper: The site characterization proposal dated March 22, 1988, was received and reviewed by a representative of this department. It meets the approval of this department and may be utilized as written to assess the area around the underground fuel tank. The Kern County Health Department must be notified 24 hours before samples are retrieved. After all field work is complete and laboratory results received, a final report must be written describing the extent of contamination and suggesting mitigation measures. The final report must be submitted to this department within 30 days of analysis completion. The department's mitigation outline is enclosed. It may be used as guide in preparing your final report. Please feel free to call me at 861-3636, if you have any questions. ~~rn~an ~..Sincerely, t~~i~lt~ / Environmen al Heal st Hazardous Materials Management Program AEG/gb enclosure DISTRICT OFFICES KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ~ APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~ RECONSTRUCT, DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL 1700 FLOWER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 PERMIT NUMBER: ~,._'~.'~ ~,L '~- / TELEPHONE: (805) 861-3636 APM: APPLICATION DATE ADDR ' * " :';~'" :: -"* PROPO$~:D'-STAIRTING DATE ' '" ~';'me~:~;~*': ~- ..'~ . PRO~SEO COMP~ION DATE . -,.~.'-.* -- ..... ~ m~: ', .... T SEC. ' ~..~, · .... .... , ,. ~. ~,,~..,~ ~ - ¥..~_. . _ DIRECTIONS TO WELL SITE: · - -* . ' ' ;~** ~-~-~'~ ~L~'~ .,~. A- . · - '~ ~.'. . .. ~,~ ~*~.'~¥ "'~ .'~L( ~, ,"~" ' . ' ' · ~.'~ ' ' '" ', *' , *'" 7'~"~ ~.~ ..,, . :~.~,:~? ~..~.~.~ ~, ·., ,?~... ~_.,~. . · .. ' ' ''.~L~ ... ' ' ~PE OF WOR~ DONE: N~WELL ~ DEEPEN (CHEC~ ONE) ~ECON~C~ON ~ DESTrUCTiON ~ ..... ~NTENDED U~E: ~OMES~C/PmVA~E ~ (~ ~nn~mn) CON~RUC~ ME~: ~O~A~~,'- ~',~.~ _ ~M~TIC/~BLIC ~ (5 ~ m~.nn~0~)' ' T~ ~ ~ . . MONITORING ".' . ~ - . ::'~ '- . ,.i ?'~ ~~~'~ ~. · :':~?~ ":~).. .- ' : ....:..t, .,. :.-::?~ ~E~. · . - ..-': . -: '.'..~. :~ ,'.J. . .... . ~. ~ .~-.~'-. SEALING MATERIAL (C.,CK ON~ ' ~"?-"": ~"~EL "~K ..... ' (CHECK ON~ .... ~:~~ : ':.....'::..: ....... :.' .... .... CEMENT GROUT ." .... '?":.~"~;~q~' TO 3 ~ CONCRETE ,:-;~ -~ .,: '. :: PUDDLED C~Y:. ~. OTHER ' ' ':' ''~: PRIED WELL:- ~x ~0 '~"""' '"' · ,:., ~,~7~,.~,~ .,: , ~, .~.',~,?.,.-~-- PEN~RAT~ 2'OR MORE A~UI~RS .......... · . ..'~ . .. :. ~.'~.~.~ ... · ';..~.~,,? , ,. .-, . ..... .,,~ . :~- 7 .. :.,.:'L~ ..' ': I?00FI~St~ KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMI HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Division of Environmental Health Leon M Hebertm)n, M.D. Telephone (80~) 861-3636 DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Well Permit Application Vernon $. Reigherd Parcel No. LOCATION Assessor's Parcel No. A. INDICATE BELOW THE EXACT LOCATION OF WELL WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: PROPERTY LINES, WATER BODIES OR WATER COURSES, DRAINAGE PATTERN, ROADS, EXISTING WELLS, SEWERS AND PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS. B.....,,,,-....... ,,...~.LOCATION OF WELL IN SECTION LINES. LOCATE WELL BY ml=/.~unIN~,l'rn~/m PROPOSED WELL SITE TO TWO (2) SEC- i ' "' / .. - ~e,,,~C TION LINES OR ¼SECTION IF 'A'~i?0AD(S) BORDERS THE ..__-,..~.~-~,..~..-..~.1~,__~ LAND. THE MEASUREMENT(S)?'~:ULD ALSO. BE .MADE. I I ~lth 580 4113 ~ EH (R~. 5~7) (~. 3 of 3) Baker's Welding and Supply . t~-~]~~.: none ~_.:Proposed 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield I~iZJI-J-E.P ~lX:.. KAI q~>l~- ~:, 50 2" ~_.~::~p.~; ~/ X ~] ... I~J~:j~l_ I~l~t Monitorin.~) x&bcJt_l~: Diversified well head tamper resistent w/surface seal ,, ~_~?~ 4" butterfly cap w/gasket and lOCk l L.m 50 ft. ~.1~.1....1~'11~'6..:Sr. hedule 40. ?" PVC blank t_7.' 15 ft. L.~ 35 ft. L.~ ) ft, ~ 8 in. OC.~l' ~-~: 6 sack sand-cement L-b, 6 in, sl.urr¥ with 3% bentonite Bentonite (3/8" pellets) (~J~ ~ed at 20 ft. ~-~F.~ )l-il~.e:./~: Schedule 40~ 2" PVC ... 0.020 slots KRAZAN ASSOCI "ES, INC. Construction Testin~ and .... ~ection Ge°technical lnvestigati°ns ~ ~ _~ Environmental Engineering Laboratory Soils Testing ~ ~ ~ ~I W' ! e , '~ i Monitoring Wells ~_~ ~.~ ~. ] . / J.//)~.~' March 22, 1988 Proj. No. 88-023 Baker's Welding & Supply 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, California 93308 Attn: Mark Cooper RE: Underground Storage Tank Leak Site Characterization Proposal Gentlemen, SITE LOCATION Baker's Welding & Supply is a retail outlet for welding equipment, located on the west side of Pierce Road between Gilmore Avenue and Getty Street in Bakersfield, California. The facility lies along the Orin Way alignment and is within 1/4 1/4 G, Section 23 T29S R27E, Mount Diablo Base Line and Meridian. The facility consists of a steel building which is divided into retail, office, and warehouse space. Also located on the site are above-ground storage tanks for liquid propane, oxygen, nitrogen, argon, and an underground storage tank containing unleaded gasoline. A septic system is located east of the building. The remainder of the site is paved with asphaltic concrete. The property is surrounded by a six-foot chain link fence. Currently, the property is owned by Cooper and Bridges, 110 South Montclair, Bakersfield, California. SITE HISTORY Baker's Welding & Supply currently stores unleaded gasoline in a 10,000 gallon buried fuel storage Lank at their Pierce Road facility for use in their own vehicles. The tank is approximately 18 years old. On November 25, 198~;, Main Office: Fresno/Clovis ,, 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 [] Visalia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 Page No. 2 Proj. No. 88-023 the underground storage tank was precision tested. The tank was found to be uncertifiable by a PeLto-tiLe system tightness test. After the leak was located and repaired, the fuel system passed a PeLto-tiLe line and tank tightness test. The contractor who repaired the line indicat, ed that the leak was minor in nature and that he felt that little product had been lost. At the beginning of December 1987, the employees noticed a sluggishness in the pumping of fuel from the unleaded storage Lank. On December 28, 1987, employees were unable to pump gasoline from the underground storage Lank. On the same day, fuel was discovered in the manway around Lhe submersible pump. The fuel, as well as a small amount of soil, was removed from the manway. Il was suspected that the fuel leaked from the union between the submersible pump and the Red .]acket Leak Detector. Reconciliation of inventory records indicate that between 200 and 600 gallons of fuel may have been lost. However, these values are approximate. The underground storage facility is not currently in operation pending results of this site characterization. SUBSURF ACE CONDITIONS The topography of the site is relatively level. The subsurface materials are composed primarily of unconsolidated material deposited by the Kern River and ils tributaries. These materials are generally composed of sands and silty sand. The 300-foo~. clay, which separates the confined aquifer from the unconfined aquifer in the Bakersfield area, is thought to extend under this site. The depth ~o groundwater below the si~e in September 1987 was approximately 20 feet. This groundwater depth was obtained from Well H5~3, which is adjacent ~o the Teamsters' Union Hail across the street from Baker's Welding & Supply. The depth to groundwater is Well H53 has been as low as 64 feet in the fall of 1976, and as high as 1/4 fee~ in September 1986. The groundwater gradient is from southeas~ Lo northwest, perpendicular to the Kern River. This information was obtained from the Kern County Water Agency's report on water conditions in improvement District #4, 1987. The groundwater level below Baker's Welding is highly variable and depends on the volume of water in the Kern River. The volume of water in the I<ern KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Page No. :~ Proj. No. 88-02:~ River near the site is the sum of the flow measured aL the Ca]loway Weir plus the inflow from Turnout t//4. Recent. and projected flow rates for the Kern River are 'summarized in Table 1. A flow rate of approximately 1,500 acre-feeL aL the Calloway Weir is necessary for surface flow to occur in the Kern River at Highway 178. Based on the projected flow rates in Table l, the water level below Baker's Welding & Supply should drop through November 1988. Table 1: Flow in the Kern River Channel, Winter 1987 to Winter 1988 Month Callowa¥ Weir (AF) Turnout lib, (AF) Total (AF) Nov. 52 0 52 Dec. 3,360 1,588 /4,948 Jan. 4,010 0 4,010 Feb. 56 0 5~ Mar. 0 0 0 No flow projected until November 1988 SCOPE and METHODOLOGY The scope of the preliminary site assessment is limited to the area directly adjacenl to the underground storage tank. The purpose of the preliminary site assessment is to determine whether or not fuel constituents are present in the soils or groundwater beneath the underground storage tank. In order to investigate these potentials, the following methods would be employed: 1. One boring (B-l) would be advanced to a depth of from 20 to /40 feet directly north of the underground storage tank. Samples would be obtained from this boring at five foot intervals until groundwater was encountered. These samples would be screened utilizing an H-nu photoionization detector. If volatile hydrocarbons were detected in the soil by the H-nu meter, and groundwater is encountered above 40 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Page No. /4 Proj. No. 88-023 feeL~ then the boring would be developed into a 2-inch groundwater monitoring well. :Z. A second boring would be placed directly south of the product dispenser just east of the underground storage tank. Samples would be obtained from this boring aL five foot intervals Lo a depth of 20 feet. These samples would be screened utilizing a photoianizatian detector. 3. Selected soil samples from the borings would be analyzed for benzene, toluene~ xylenes, ethylbenzene~ and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Analysis would be performed by an analytical lab certified for such testing by [he State of California. i;O .0~.~.,i,¢1.~~ /4. If a well is installed, groundwater samples would be obtained from the monitoring well and tested for benzene~ toluene~ xylenes~ ethylbenzene~ and total petroleum hydrocarbons. 5. All exploratory soil borings would be made by means of hollow stem flight auger. ~;. Sampling would be conducted by means of pushing stainless steel tubes to obtain discrete samples (test method ASTMD _t587-86, "Thin-wall tube sampling of soils"). 7. Soils borings would be backfilled with a sand cement slurry. 8. Drilling returns would be barreled and stored onsite, pending results of chemical analysis. 9. A report would be prepared presenting the results of the field exploration and chemical analysis of soil samples encompassing all work accomplished in this phase of the investigation, as well as conclusions and recommendations based on these results. The report would also include a plot plan showing [he !oca~ion of all borings. Additional information on field and laboratory methodology is contained in l:he attached Appendix titled Methodology. A diagram of the proposed monitoring well is at[ached. If there are any quest'ions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Page No. 5 Proj. No. 88-023 Respectfully Submitted~ KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Richard M. Stauber Staff ffngineer Dean Alexander Registered Civil Engineer RCE #~4274 RMS/DA/mdc KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES ~,~;::~___,L,C~ ~__...E~, Project FIo. I I':-"~-~lDrawin8 No.Ii~ Merced Fresno Visalia Bakersfield ~ I I or,:-- I Project Ho. I ~-'Dl~)rawin8 Ho. ~ Merced Fresno Visalia Bakersfield I ~ or~ Baker's Weldin~ and Supply ~-J~'['h~.: none ~: Proposed 3505 Pierce Road, Bakersfield 1:~I24L-L_~_J:~ [~x/': KAI '~ ~t~: 50 2" ~c~p.~: 'F~ X FI ~J~.j_ ~7~)?'. Monitorin,9 ~OL_i~: Diversified well head tamper resistent w/surface seal' ,,, ~Z~?~ 4" butterfly cap w/gasket and lock. Li 50 ft. d~L.~.~l~¢_.: Schedule 40~ 2" pVC blank Uz. 15 ft. ~ 35 ft. ~F ~ in, ~d~J~( ~z~= 6 sack sand-cement ~ 6 in, slurry with 3% bentonite Bentonite (3/8" pellets) Estimated at 20 ft. ~-F_~ I~JT~_JC~Z~L-: Schedule 40, 2" PVC 0.020 slots A. MO[31LIZATION PROCEDURES Drill personnel shall coordinate all uite activities arid access with the project engineer al: least ten working days in advance. The project engineer shall coordinate with local agency authoritiea and shall comply with all applicable regulations and permitting procedures. Prior to initiating drilling and sa~npling, the following activities shall be accomplished: 1. All utilities and piping shall be accurately located, based on a method of accepted practice. 2. All drilling and sampling equip~nent ,~hull be ste~Jlll cleaned or washed with high pressure/high temperature water at tile beginning of each drilling operation. 3. Containers for storing contaminated soil cuttings and contaminated water shall be supplied by the project engineer as needed. All necessary permits and associated fees for conducting drilling activities, including, but not limited to easement, air quality, and well drilling permits, as needed, shall be obtained prior to drilling. SOIL BORING P~.QCEDUt-<ES Drilling should be acco~nl)lished witl~ a I~ollow stem, continuou.~ flight auger. Under no circumstances are drilling fluids of any type, or water, to be added to the boring during collection of soil samples. All borings shall be described in detail usin9 tile U~ified 5oil Classification System and shall be logged by a professional geologist, civil engineer, or engineering geologist who is registered or certified by tile State of California and who is experienced in tile use of the Unified Soil Ch~ssification System. A technician trained and expe,-ienced ir, tile use of the Unified Soil -2- Classification System who is working under the direct supervision of one 'of the professionals shall be deelned qualified to log borlngo provided the aforementioned professional reviews the logs and assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the logs. All samples shall be clearly marked showing facility's name, 8itc; boring numbers, depth where samples take~, sequence of sample as bottom-l, upper-2 and top-:}. Ground water and/or cuttings generated during the drilling operations should be disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the California State Department of Health Services and/or the local implementing agency. C. SAMPLING PROCEDURES 1. Soil Samplincj Procedures Soil samples would generally be obtained at five foot intervals as measured from the surface (see SOIL BORING PROCEDURES), however, no soil samples shall be taken in the saturation zone if ground water is encountered. Soil Samples shall be collected utilizing a modified California drive sampler (2 in. 1. D.) or stainless steel push tubes. Sample lines shall be brass or stainless steel tubes. A minimum of one sample tube is to be collected at each sampling depth and tubes shall be capped air tight with a!unfinum foil or Teflon, and plastic caps, sealed, labelled, and placed in an ice chest for storage and transport to a certified analytical laboratory. Temperature within the ice chest shall be maintained near 4 degrees Centigrade. Under no circumstances is water ice to be used width may melt arid result in sample submersion. The sample number of each sample shall be entered on a signed chain-of-custody form. The re~nainder of tl~e salnple Lubes a~d soil i~ tl~e ~ample barrel shoe shall be used to complete field analysis. At all sample depths, one or two field tests, as specified under FIELD TESTING PROCEDURES shall be performed to assess tile presence or abse~ce of hydrocarbon contamination in the soil. Between sample depths, the sample barrel, shoe and water barrel shall be steam-cleaned or washed with high pressure/high temperature water. Drying should be accotnplished with clean disposable paper towels, and dry sample equipment shall be placed in clean, disposable paper towel until needed for next sample depth. -3- 2. Water Samplin~l Procedure a. Sampling for Floating Free Product. The sampling of free product which may be floating on the aurfaee of the ground water shall not be performed until the well has been allowed to stablize for at least 2,/; hours after development or other withdrawal procedure. A sample shall be collected which is indicative of the thickness of floating product within the monitoring well. This may be accomplished by the use of a clear acrylic bailer which is designed to collect a liquid free sample al' the free product/ground water interface. A graduated scale on the bailer is helpful for determining the thickness of free product. b. Sampling for Dissolved Product. If less than one-fourth inch of free product is detected by the above method, then analysis for dissolved constituents shall be performed by tho following ~nethod: The well shall be purged by bailing or pumping to remove four to ten well volumes prior to ~mnpling, or until the discharge water indicates sL~bilizgliol~ of temperalure, conductJvity~ and pH. 1[ the well is evacuated before four to ten well volumes are removed, or stabilization is achieved, the sample shall be taken when the water level in the weJ[ recovers to approximately 80% of its initial water level. However, for wells where recovery is very slow~ the sample should be taken as soon as the water level is sufficient Lo recover a representative sample. 2) Following appropriate purging, sample of the ground water shall be obtained in a manner which reduces or elirnina[es the possibility of loss of volatile constituents from the sample. For collecting samples~ a gas-~cuLed positive di'~place~nent pump or a ~ubmersible pump is preferred. A '[eflo~ or sLeel bailer is acceptable. Peristalitie pumps or air-lift pumps shall not be used. 3) Water samples shall be collected in vials or other eontainer8 specifically designed to I)revm~t loss of volatile constituents from the sample. No headspace should be present in the sample container once the container has bee sealed. Samples shall be handled and preserved in accordance with the procedures and methods acceptable by the State and local jurisdictions. -4- D. FIELD TESTING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION At all sample depths) the soil and water shall be field tested for benzene concentration using a portable photoionization detector (PID). E. LABORATORY ANALYSIS Sample collection, preservation and analysis shall be performed in accordance with the procedures acceptable to the county and the Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. The turn-around time for -~uch analysis shall not exceed fifteen working days. F. MONITORING WELLS 1. General. Monitoring wells shall be constructed if required in accordance with the following specifications. a. A boring of 8 inches dimneLer shall be drilled to a maximum depth of 40 feet and/or at least 25 feet into the saturation zone. Should an aquitard or clay layer of five feet or more be encountered at any point below the wa[er table, drilling shall be halted and the exces~ hole i~ to be backfilled with concrete and the monitoring well constructed in the overlaying aquifer. b. Drilling shall be accomplished with a hollow stern, continuous flight auger. Under no circumstances shall conventional mud-rotary drill~ be used. 2. Completion of Monitorinq WeLl a. Wells must be constructed of materials which will lea~t affect wa[er quality data, and be of sufficient durability to withstand deterioration. Acceptable pil)e con.J[ruction material~ include: Polyvinyl chloride, stainless steel or low carborm ~teel. These material~ shall be thoroughly cleaned and rinsed with water so a~ to be free from organic contamination. b. Casings should be threated or fitted with slip sleeves, however, organic sealants shall not be used. The well casing shall be cement grouted with an annular seal beginning from 2 feet above the perforation zone to the ground surface or subsurface vault, and an appropriate surface sealer applied to prevent local surface contamination. Well centralizers shall be used so that perforations, well screens, gravel pack and annular seals are properly centered within the borohole. c. Gravel Pack Over Well Perforation Zone. The well perforation zone shall be packed with appropriate sand or gravel to provide filtration capacity and prevent siltation fro the aquifier zone. It should be constructed with well-rounded materials (crushed materials are unacceptable), and washed clean of silt, dirt and all other foreign matter. The filtration zone should extend two feet above the top of the perforated zone. Placement of the -~and or gravel pack zone and proceed upward. Filter placement shall be conducted in such a manner Lo minimize the possibility of segregation. d. Annular Seal An un~ular sea[ should be placed above Ll~e zone of perforation and extend to the ground surface or subsurface containment vault. It shall be composed of neat cement, cement grou~, or concrete. If cement ia used, it shall be class A Portland Cement. In ca~e9 whore PVC ca~ing~ are u~ed [1~o la[o~lL heal of hydr~Lion should be monitored to prevent damage of premature failure of the ca~ing. The effect~ of latent heal can be minimized by the addition of bentonite or sand, or by si~nply allowing the mixture Lo cool before placement. A finer zone of material is required above the gravel pack to prevent seepage of sealer material. This layer should be composed of bentonite pellets. Sealer material should be thoroughly mixed with clean water, The materials shall be placed~ beginning from the bottom of the ~ealing interval~ in such a manner to prevent bridging~ dilution and segregation when placed underwater. If bentonite pellets are used for the seal~ placement can be through free fall as bentonite pellets would sink to tl~e bottom of any water which may have seeped into tt~e l~ole. Whe~ I~urtla~d ce~ne~t is used~ placement shall be in one continuous lift ~or the entire interval to be sealed. e. Well Bottom Plug~ The bottom of each well should be permanently sealed to prevent improper well development, siltation, or a cavity from forming at the base of the easing. Tlfi~ sl~ould be ~eeo~nplished with either a screw-on or friction cap, secured without the u~e of organic sealing compounds. f. Surface Security and Identification The platform or surface of each'well head shall be protected from all unauthorized entry, from fluids or va~dalism. Well heads may be secured above or below the ground de~ending on local surface conditions. Tile well hand 0hall bo healed with a waLer tight cap and be secured or looked. Well heads secured below the surface shall be vaulted, in a concrete or similar type vault, secured with a locking cover. The vault installation shall provide for drainage of accumulated ~urface run-off. £ach well shall be identified according to standard procedure~ including owner, well number, type of installation, and pertinent construction dale such as del)th, casing~ diameter~ and well screen perforation intervals. Well Development a. All monitoring wells shall be developed in order to clean the well and stabilize Lhe sand, gravel, and aquifier materials around the screens and perforaLions. Well developme~it may be accomplished by bailing~ surging or swabbing. Well development shall continue until the wall i~ thoroughly developed and free of sand~ silt and turbidity. b. If initial develop~nent pumping dewaLers tl~e wall casing and thereby inhibits development, clean, potable grade water can be Introduced into the well, followed by surgi~g of tho waters introduced with a swab or surge block. Care ~nust be taken not to damage the well screen or casing willie swabbing or surging. This is to be followed by pumping. The procedure should be repeated as required Lo establish full development. c. In the event a monitoring well cannot be completed as specified, abandon well by filling is in accordance with provisions set forth for abandonment of well ira Department of Water Resources Bulletin No. 74 and move drilling equipme~t Lo a new location. ~RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME~mmm~r 1700 Flower Street AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D. Bakersfield, California 93305-4198 Director of Public Health Telephone (805) 861-3621 Air Pollution Control Officer January 28, 1988 Baker's Welding and Supply 3505 Pierce Road Bakersfield, California 93308 Attn: Mark Cooper Dear Mr. Cooper: A representative from this department made a site inspection of the underground tank facility, located at 3505 Pierce Road, in Bakersfield, California (Permit #050033C). The following information was obtained: 1. The unleaded fuel tank at the facility had been tightness tested a year ago. 2. Cal Valley discovered fuel in the manway around the submerged pump on the unleaded fuel tank on 12-28-87, at 2:45 P.M. They pumped the fuel out and removed some of the contaminated soil, placing tile soil on the asphalt near the manway cover. They suspected that the fuel was leaking out of a union attached to the submercible pump. They advised the manager to contact the Kern County Health Department. 3. The inspection by a representative of the Kern County Health Department revealed fuel odors emitting from the manway which housed the submercible pump for the unleaded fuel tank. The tank had been taken out of service and the area around the manway was roped off. Mark Cooper was called and the condition of the tank was discussed. The purpose of this letter is to describe what the facility is required to do in order to investigate the contamination plume, and repair the leak so that the tank may be returned to service. Baker's Welding and Supply Mark Cooper Page 2 January 28, 1988 1. The unleaded fuel tank must remain out-of-service until the leak is repaired and a receipt is presented to the Kern County Health Department, verifying the repair. 2. A site characterization proposal must be prepared describing how the lateral and vertical extent of contamination around the leak is going to be determined. The proposal must be submitted to this department within 30 days and approved before any work to characterize the site is initiated. The department's outline far preparation of the site characterization proposal is enclosed. It may be used as a guide in preparing the proposal. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, .~~~~~ Environmental Health Specialist ltazardous Materials Management Program AEG/gb aa~a,~Lw~o~os, . COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN ~E~u~.~ ':.ii _' ' ..... .. . .,, ,.. ..... ...... · ,. . ...... , .:. .. . · ?~:; ~'~ · FACIhI~.., ........ -"-' ' ~: ..... ? ~', .' ..... :" ;'. -:?',' .... :' :~ I.'. ',.;' O~R=.:~?~,<,?:~::~:';:~r-~:t~',.~,~;.~:,:~:~;~'~:' ':::::~:? .~.;.:~, ,.~ :<"~'.... '. I __,__~O~ iN YRS) _ _SUBSTANC T~K ~ - . . _ -- ,, -...:-~-:..?, :~."~ ;.,;,,,..,: - ._, .... , :- . ,~ '; .~./.:, ~,,~...',~.,,,.;.~,~ .:, . NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS EST~LISHKD BY THE' 'Pg~TTING:'~.' AUTHORITY MUST B~ MET DU~IN~ THE NON--TRANSFERABLE DA~ P~IT miT,m: JUL i 6 1986 .. DA~ P~IT ~K LIST ~: PERMIT CHECKLIST This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and return to KCHD' in the self-addressed envelope provided within 30 days of receipt. Check:_ ..... Yes No A. The packet I received contained: F __ 1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase I Interim Permit Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement Between Owner and Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #6-3941), Explanation of Substance Codes, Equipment Lists and Return Envelope. ~ ~ 2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10. ~/' 3) The Following Forms: a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Recording Sheet with summary on reverse c) Trend Analysis Worksheet ,/ __ 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C. I have the following r_e_quired equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument ~ 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) v/ 3) Water-finding paste D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner and Ouerator and hereby state that the owner of this facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). / E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have had calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook). G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures described in Handbook - / -_ ,/./ - 10~000 Gal. Tank 95" x 32,,6a L~:. · 1 o 18 33, '3088 65. : :,?Z'9,3 5. 2,02 3 7. 3605 69. ?.'782. ' '" 6. 264 30. 3736 70' .. 7931 7, 332 39° 3868 ' 71. '8318 . 404 40° 4000 '.'-.72.,. ..,8134 ,c, 481 " .41. 4133 73. 8Z48~ la.. 561 42* 4266 ?4. 83'60 11. 645 43. 4399 75. 84?0 12. ?33 44. 4533 ?6. 8579 13. 823 .45. 4667 77. 8685 14. 917 46, 4301 78. 2789 16 . 1113 43 . 5068 80, ~8989 17. lZ14 49, 5202 81, 908'6 18. 131B 50 o 5336 82. 9'180 19° 1424 51. · 5470 83° 92.70 20. 1533 52,. 5604 84 ° 93 58 21. 1643 53° 5737 85, 944Z 22,, 1755 54 o 5807 86 ° 95,?,2. 23, 1869 55° 6003 87° 9599 24° 1985 56° 6135 '~ 88. 9671 £5° 210Z 57, 6267 89° '9739 26.. 2221 58. 6398 90. 9831 27. Z341 , 59° 65Z8 91° 9858 .. Z8. Z~63 60. 6658 9Z. 99'39 29, Z586 61. 6787 93. 9'951 ., 30. 27 lO 62, 6915 94, 998'5 31 ° 2835 63, 7042 · 95. 10003 ~I]/TER CALIBRATION CHECK FORM Note: 1. All meters must have calibration checks a minimum of twice ~ year, which may include checks done by the Department of Weights and--~easures. 2. Before starting calibration runs, wet the calibration can with product and return product to storage. 3. Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 4. Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open into the ca~]. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. ' 5. After al1 product for one calibration check is returned to storage, remember to record the volume returned to storage In column 9 of the Inventory Recording Sheet. 6. If the volume measured in a 5-gallon calibration can is more than 6 cubic inches above or below the 5-gallon mark, the meter requires callbratio-~n by a registered device repairman. Date/Time !Hose o;{Tank t/{ Fast Flow Slow Flow Volume Returned{Calibration{ Device Repairman ~ Date of ~Pump Product{ 5-Gallon Draft 5-Gallon Draft to StoraEe [ Required? ! Used for Calibration {Oals Cu. Inches Oals CU. Inches Oallo~s {__Yes No { CalibratiOn ~" ~--~(~ / ~"'~'~'~{'~ 0 ~- .I-.3 /O.O 1'.,~ lc .... -,.~-.~ '~-?~,"~ Own er or Operator S Calibrator's Signature _ (~.~' -%>'{___~'.~ _~.~'~.c~-- Registration SUBMIT A COPY OF Tills FORM WITlt ANNUAL REPORT. · Division Environmental Heal~% Application DarTM- 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfi~ CA 93305 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND ? .... ,Lo HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAf]E FACILITY ~'~' 557 Type of Application (check): &~F [~N~; Facility ['~Mod.ification of Facility ~Existing Facility [2]Transfer of Ownership A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days ~,~ ~,z~' Nights Facility Name ~.~$ ~.~,~ ~~~9 ~. ~, -No. Of Tanks _ Type of Business (check): ~TGaso'line'~tation ~)ther (describe) ]~T~.; ~"x, Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [~Yes [~No ~/ Is Tank(s) Used Primarily.for i~gric~tural Purposes? [2lYes [~No Facility Address ~.~i~ ~,~. /~.~ Nearest Cross St. ~ ~m..~.~.--- T R SEC ' ' Rural C~ly) ( Locations Operator -~ ' - / Contact Person Address t_~-~ ~ ~_~ Zip Telephone ~/~. Water to Facility Provided by ~a~,;r ~-'~.._-/~ .~ Depth to GrOundwater Soil Characteristics at Facility Basis for Soil Type and GroundwaterDete ~na ~onsDepth ...~,~ ~ C. Contractor CA Contractor' s License No. Addr ess Zip Telephone Proposed Startir~ Date Propose~' C~pletion Dste Worker's C~mpensation Certification ~ Insurer D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): / Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premi~ Diesel Waste Fuel F. Chenical Cc~position of Naterials Stored (not: necessary for motor vehicle fuels) Tank # Che~i~l Stored {non-commercial na~e) CJ~.q ! (if kno~) Chemical Previou~l~ Stored ( if different) G. Transfer of Ownership Date of ~--~ Previous Owner Previous Faci. lity Name I, accept fully all obligations of Permit No. __ issued to · I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the Pemit to Operate this ~dergro~d storage facility upon receiving this ccmpleted form. This form has been.completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. ~/' Signature ' ' Title (~/~_ ~,;_~ F~. Date ~ TANK ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM i.~H TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [']Vaulted [-]Non-Vaulted [~Double-Wal 1 ~Sing le-Wal 1 2. ~ Material --~Carbon Steel [-] stainless Steel [-]Polyvinyl Chloride I-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [~ Al~m~in~ [] Bronze [']Unknown Other (describe) 3. ~ Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. ~; Co~t'ainment ~lDoubleLWall DSynthetic Liner DLined Vault []None ~Unknown [] Other (describe): Manufacturer: D-[Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Linin~ ---~Rubber []Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay []t~lined [-]Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --~Ga-l~-~-F~r---~g-~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap []Vinyl Wrappin~ []Tar or Asphalt ~Unknown []None []Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~N?ne []Impressed Current System ~lSacrl'~'l~ial A~ode System Describe' System & Equi[a~ent: 7. Leak Detection, Monitori .n~, and Interce~)tion ~. Yank: ~Visua'l (Vaul"ted tanks 0nly) DGroundwater Monitorir~' Well(s) [~Vac~os~ Zone Monitoring Well(s) []U-Tube Without Liner []U-Tube with Compatible Liner Directin~ Flow to Monitorirg ~e.ll(s)* [] Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor [~ Conductivity Sensor" [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank- [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular S~ace [] Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testing [] None [] ~nknown [] Other b. Piping: I-]Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized []Monitoring S~m~p with Race~y []Sealed Concrete Rece~y D']Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~y []None ~Unkno,.n I'10~er *Describe Make & Model': 8. ~en Tightness Tested? []Yes I-INo ~l~Unkno~ Date o£ Laar. Tightness Test Re~lts o~ Test Test Name ~est£ng Cc~pany 9. Tank Repair Tan [] es []No ilUnkno m Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Over~ll Protection '~Operator Fills, Controls, ~ Visually Monitors Level []Tape F~oat Gauge []Float Vent Valves []Auto Shut-.- 0~ Controls  pacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box []None l--lUnknova~ Other: List Make & Model ~'or ~x~ve Devices l!. Piping a. Underground Piping: ~¥es I-INO l-lUnkno~m Material . Thickness (inches) Diameter ~anu~acturer -~ ~Pressure ~uct~on []Gravity ~opro~c~mate Length c~ ~ipe · Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : l-lGalvanized []Fiberglass-Clad r'iT_mpressed Current []Sacrt~i¢ial ~ocle []Polyethylene Wrap I-IElectrica~ Isol~t.~.on I-Iv~ny! Wrap l-I?ar or ~Unkno~m []None []Other (desc:r~be) .~ ¢. Underground Pipir~J, Secondary ¢ontatr~e~'~t: I-1Other (describe): ' I~";~K£UF.E-'0 X ,0 TO~ ESS..'rH~ ,NCH. ,CO. .~., ~ ,0 ,NC~*~:S r' '~ ~ '.1o'.... ' 46 0780 r~ ...