Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUST 1/24/2001~/ ~ HAZarDOUS MATERIAIS ~VISION ~TiME CHARGED BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DA~: N~: CHGD: COM~~S: --Please... 9UTINq&RgQUEST ~ ~ Approve And... ~ Return ~ Keep or Recycle ~ Review with Me ( Post-i~ 7664 ~M 1995 ) California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 12 August 2003 Regional Board Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue ................. Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Work, Health and Safety Plan (P_l_an).dated July 2003 and prepared by AJ Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The Plan provides supplemental information concerning excavation of impacted soils. We requested the Plan by our letter dated 30 May 2003. That letter conditionally approved the work proposed by the Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003 and the Corrective Action Plan Addendum (CAPA) dated 12 May 2003 and prepared for AJE by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon). We reiterate our conditional approval for the remedial action and request that you proceed with remedial action and submit a remedial action report. A properly licensed civil engineer or geologist must be in responsible charge of the work. A project summary was included in our letter dated 19 March 2003. A summary of the Plan and Our comments follow. Plan Summary Two soil samples will be collected from the floor and four samples will be collected from the sidewalls of Plume 1 (the former UST cluster in the northern portion of the site). Sidewall samples will be collected from approximately 25 feet below g~oUnd surface (bgs). One soil sample will 'be collected from the floor of each of the Plume 2 and 3 excavations (dispensers). Four composite samples of four samples each will be collected from the backfill. The samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) by EPA Method 8015M. the excavations will be backfilled using the stockpile material if TPH-d is detected at less than 100 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Excavation will be the responsibility of Lutrel Services, Inc. (Lutrel). Lutrel will excavate soil, collect soil samples,, transport contaminated soil to Clean Harbor Disposal Site (Buttonwillow, Kern County), import, place and place and compact the backfill. Contaminated soil will be stockpiled prior to transport. Trucks transporting contaminated soil will be covered. Trucks will travel north of Buck Owens Boulevard to Golden State Highway, west to Highway 99, north to 7th Standard Road, west to Buttonwillow Rowleee Road, south to Highway 58, west to Lokern Road, and west approximately 3 miles to the disposal site. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 12 August 2003 Comments Based on review of the above-summarized report, we have the following comments: By our letters dated 19 March and 30 May 2003, we concurred with Horizon's Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003. We concurred that soil excavation and disposal and passive groundwater remediation are feasible remedial options. We conditionally approved the work proposed in the CAE and the CAPA. We approved the removal and transport of impacted soils off-site for disposal. We requested that transported soils be securely covered during transport to reduce blowing sand and dust. Our letter of 30 May 2003 also requested that excavation be conducted in accordance with Federal and California OSHA.. requirements and permitting. We requested that backfill be compacted to 90 percent re--~ig'~-d4fi~ii-y -in anticipation of future site development. Compaction testing reports by a licensed firm should be included in the remedial action report. All local ordinances should be followed.' Our letters requested that approximately eight sidewall confirmation samples, or one sample per every 30 feet of excavation sidewall length be collected. Soil samples should be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. We reiterate that request. The Plan indicates that Lutrel will excavate soil, collect soil samples, transport contaminated soil to the disposal site, import, place, and compact the backfill. The work must be under the overall responsible charge of a properly licensed civil engineer or geologist. That licensed professional should direct soil sampling. The Plan indicates that stockpiled soil will be used as backfill if less than 100 mg/kg of TPH-d is detected in composite samples. We also request that you do not backfill with soil displaying observed discoloration or odor, regardless of analytical results. We previously approved the reinstallation of monitoring well GW- 1 and requested that you conduct two semiannual post remedial monitoring events. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. Provided that you follow comments from our '19 March and 30 May 2003 letters and this letter, we approve the proposed work. Submit a remedial action report by 3 November 2003. V:\UGT~ProjectsUDW_files\2003 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield CasesXHoldenTruck 7-03.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson ~ 3 - 12 August 2003 Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Howard Wines llI,. Cit. y of Bakersfi~eld Fire Department, Bakersfieli~t~ Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield File: UST/Former Holden Truck Plaza/3775 Buck Owens Blvd. Bakersfield/5T15000865 V:\UG71ProjectsklDW_filesk2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 7-03.doc California Regi°nalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair. Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary.p~r Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5 ! 16 · FAX (559) 445-5910 30 May 2003 Regional Board Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 west Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Corrective Action Plan Addendum (CAPA) dated 12 May 2003 and prepared by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon). The CAPA was prepared for and was submitted by AJ Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). We requested the CAPA by our letter dated 19 March 2003. The CAPA evaluates the feasibility of reuse of excavated soil and provides information not included in the Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003 and prepared by Horizon. We conditionally approve the remedial action proposed in the CAE and CAPA. A site-specific Health and Safety Plan should be submitted prior to the work. We request that you submit a remedial action report. Prior to our review for closure, we request that you conduct two semiannual post-remedial groundwater monitoring events. A project summary was included in our letter dated 19 March 2003. A summary of the CAPA and our comments follow. CAPA Summary The CAPA evaluates the reuse of excavated soils as roadbase, provides a map of the excavation proposed in the CAP, a confirmation soil sampling and analysis plan, information concerning soil transport and disposal, and a post-remedial groundwater monitoring plan; Horizon was unable to find a company willing to reuse the excavated diesel impacted soil. Horizon contacted several asphalt batching and construction companies in the Bakersfield area. The companies would not accept the soil due to liability concerns, not being permitted for such activities, or because the soil was not compatible with materials processing. Horizon concludes that reuse of the excavated soils is not feasible. Horizon proposes to dispose of soils containing greater than 100 parts per million (ppm) total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d). Less contaminated soil and overburden will be stockpiled on-site for reuse as backfill. Based on this remediation goal and previous site assessment data, Horizon estimates the volume of impacted soils in Plumes 1 through 3 to be approximately 2,000, 400, and 50 cubic yards, respectively. Plume 1 will be excavated to a depth of at least 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) with California Environmental Protection Agency ~x~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 30 May.2003 expected surface dimensions of 105 feet by 35 feet. Horizon estimates that approximately 4,000 cubic yards of overburden will be removed and will be stockpiled for reuse as backfill. Monitoring well GW- 1 will be removed from the excavated area. Plumes 2 and 3 will be excavated to 20 and 15 feet bgs, respectively. The Plume 2 excavation will have an expected surface area of 12 by 25 feet. The Plume 3 excavation will have an expected surface area of 12 by 10 feet. Two soil samples will be collected from the floor and four samples will be collected from the sidewalls of the Plume 1 excavation to confirm the limit of impacted soil. Sidewall samples will be collected at approximately 25 feet bgs. One soil sample will be collected from the floor of the Plume 2 and 3 excavations. Soil samples will be collected from the excavator bucket. Four sets of composite samples will be collected from the backfill stockpile. Each composite sample will consist of four samples. Soil samples will be analyzed for TPH-d by EPA method 8015M. The excavations will be backfilled if 3~PH--_d.is_d.ete~.ted. in the_c~n._firmation samples at less than.__l 0~__C__~mjlji_g_ra_ms- p_er_kil_o_gr_am_(m.g_/kg____). ' Contaminated soils will be profiled and manifested as necessary for disposal at the McKittrick Waste Treatment Site, McKittrick, Kern County. Existing analytical data will be utilized as much as possible. A properly licensed waste hauler will conduct loading and transport. Horizon estimates that approximately 2,000 to 2,500 cubic yards of soil will be transported. The transport route follows State Highway 58 to McKittrick. The excavation will be backfilled with excavated soils lacking field evidence of diesel range hydrocarbons and confirmed by TPH-d concentrations of less than 100 mg/kg in excavation and stockpile samples. Clean imported fill will be added as necessary to backfill the excavations. Following excavation and backfill, monitoring well GW-1 will be replaced. Horizon recommends four quarters of post remediation groundwater monitoring. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-d, total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). The site should be considered for low risk closure if decreasing hydrocarbon concentrations are' detected dur. ing the post remedial monitoring history. Horizon has not prepared a Health and Safety Plan (HSP). Horizon recommends that the contractor selected to conduct the work prepare the HSP. Comments Based on review of the above-summarized report, we have the following comments: By our letter dated 19 March 2003, we ~oncurred with Horizon's Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003, that soil excavation and disposal and passive groundwater remediation are feasible remedial options. We reiterate our concurrence. We conditionally approve the work proposed in the CAE and the CAPA. We concur that reuse of contaminated soils does not appear feasible. We approve removal and transport to the McKittrick Waste Treatment Site. We approve the transport route. We request that transported soils be securely covered during transport to reduce blowing sand and dust. V:\UGTSProjectsUDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck CAP Addend 5-03.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 30 May 2003 Excavation should be conducted in accordance with Federal and California OSHA requirements and permitting. Backfill should be compacted to 90 percent relative density in anticipation of future site development. Compaction testing reports by a licensed firm should be included in the remedial action report. All local ordinances should be followed. We request that you contact us if anticipated future site use makes compaction testing appear unnecessary. We request that approximately eight sidewall confirmation samples, or one sample per every 30 feet of excavation sidewall length be collected. Soil samples should be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. We approve the reinstallation of monitoring well GW-1. We request that you conduct two semiannual post remedial monitoring events after GW-1 is reinstalled. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. We will review the site for closure following your submission of the second semiannual groundwater monitoring report. The contractor selected to perform the work should submit a site-specific HSP. Please submit the HSP by 28 July 2003 or at least three weeks prior to fieldwork. Please submit a remedial action report.by 30 September 2003. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 The Fresno office relocated to 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 on 4 November 2002. Our main telephone number of (559) 445-5116 and fax number of (559) 445-5910 will remain the same, as will telephone numbers of staff. Please direct correspondence to our new address. JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento "'~ Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, BakersfielaX',~ Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield V:\UGTXProjects~JDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck CAP Addend 5-03.doc California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Dav!s Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-59[0 27 March 2003 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson '5201-WEg-t- Pi~t'e- AW6ffue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Groundwater Monitoring Report # 7 (Monitoring Report) dated March 2003 and transmitted by a cover letter dated 14 March 2003. A J Environmental of Bakersfield (AJE) prepared the Monitoring Report. The Monitoring Report documents a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 6 February 2003. We currently request that groundwater monitoring be continued on a semiannual schedule. We request that you submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Addendum. We will consider approval of the remedial options proposed in the CAP based upon our review of the CAP addendum. A summary of the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Monitorin~ Report Summary AJE performed the seventh (First Quarter 2003) groundwater monitoring event on 6 February 2003. Depth to groundwater ranged from 26.61 to 28.78 feet below the tops of the well casings (below TOC). AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be west (S88W) and the gradient to be 29.5 feet per mile (0.005 feet per foot). Groundwater flow is consistent with~previous monitoring e~v_e~ts_. ~ - -Grimed-water elevation has decreased by approximately 0.17 feet since the last (5 November 2002) monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells GW-1 through GW-4. The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) by EPA Method 8015; and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8020. TPH-d and TPH-g were detected in MW-1 at 640 and 78 micrograms per liter (~g/L), respectively. TPH-d was also detected in MW-4, the downgradient well, at 340 gg/L. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and MTBE were not detected. TPH-d was detected in the samples collected from monitoring wells GW-1 and GW-4 at 650 and 800 gg/L, respectively, during the last monitoring event. TPH-g was detected' in GW- 1 at 51 gg/L during the last monitoring event. California Environmental Protection Agency Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 2 27 March 2003 Comments We request that groundwater monitoring continue on a semiannual schedule. Based on the low TPH-d and TPH-g concentrations detected during the last several monitoring events and consistent groundwater flow, quarterly monitoring is not necessary. Groundwater monitoring may be resumed on a quarterly schedule following soil remediation. Please submit a report documenting the August 2003 semiannual monitoring event by 6 October 2003. Groundwater samples collected during the next (August 2003) semiannual monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH,d by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. By our letter dated 30 October 2002, we indicated that excavation appears to be a feasible remedial option and requested that your consultant develop a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for soil and groundwater evaluating the feasibility and cost effectiveness of remedial options, including excavation with both on-site treatment and off-site disposal or reuse, and "no further action." You submitted Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003 and prepared by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills for AJE. The CAE recommends excavation with off-site disposal and passive groundwater remediation as the remedial options for soil and groundwater, respectively. By our letter dated 19 March 2003, we indicated that we would consider approval of these options following your submission of a CAP Addendum evaluating the cost and feasibility of reusing impacted soils as roadbase or other reuse and containing specifications for implementing the options. We remind you that the CAP Addendum is due by 29 May 2003. Please contact this office at least five days prior to fieldwork. Should you have questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 The Fresno office relocated to 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 on 4 November 2002. Our main telephone number of (559) 445-5116 and fax number of (559) 445-5910 will remain the same, as will telephone numbers of staff. Please direct correspondence to our new address. JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Howard Wines 1II, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield File: UST/Former Holden Truck Plaza/5T15000865 V:\UGT~Prqiects\JDW_files\2003 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldnTrckGW 3-03.doc O California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary./br Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental lnternet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-51 t 6 · FAX (559) 445-59 l 0 19 March 2003 Regional Board Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Corrective Action Evaluation (CAE) dated 12 February 2003. The CAE was prepared by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon) and was submitted by AJ Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The CAE evaluates remedial alternatives for soil and groundwater impacted by diesel fuel released from the on-site underground storage tank (UST) systems and recommends excavation with off-site disposal for soil remediation and passive groundwater remediation. We requested that you submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) by our letter dated 30 October 2002. We will consider approving these remedial options following submission of a CAP Addendum evaluating the cost and feasibility of reusing impacted soils as roadbase or other reuse and containing specifications for implementing the selected remedial options. Summaries of the Project and CAE, and our comments follow. Pro, iect Summary The site is approximately 3,000 feet north of the Kern River and approximately 2,700 feet south- southwest of the Kern Water Agency office and recharge pond. The site is bounded on the west by State Highway 99 and on the east by Buck Owens Boulevard: A cluster of gasoline and diesel USTs were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985. The USTs and associated dispensers and piping were removed during 1998. Subsequent investigation identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume (and the only plume that appears to have reached groundwater) extends southwest from the former UST clt/ster. Impacted soil extends at least to the water table (approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs)). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up ~7.~ to 10,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were detected in soil samples. A TPH-d concentration of ... 120 mg/kg was detected at 17 feet bgs in boring GW-4, near the western site boundary. During the ', 23 January 2002 monitoring event, a TPH-d concentration of 4,300 micrograms per liter (gg/L) was i .detected in monitoring well GW-1 (near the former USTs) and a TPH-d concentration of 2,700 gg/L was .:' detected in monitoring well GW-4. The lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil has been defined. i. "The downgradient extent of impacted groundwater has not been defined. During the 5 November 2002 -~ .., California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 19 March 2003 monitoring event, TPH-d concentrations of 650 and 800 [tg/L, were detected in GW-1 and GW-4, respectively. CAE Summary Horizon evaluates passive remediation, excavation and disposal, and excavation and aboveground treatment as potential remedial alternatives for soil and passive remediation and in-situ bioremediation as remedial alternatives for groundwater. Horizon selects excavation and disposal and passive remediation as the remedial alternatives for soil and groundwater, respectively. Excavation and aboveground treatment is less expensive than excavation and disposal, but would prevent the site from being utilized for approximately 180 days and may not achieve the reduction in TPH-d concentrations necessary to allow reuse as backfill. After the impacted soils have been removed, passive remediation (natural attenuation) is expected to reduce TPH-d concentrations. Horizon recormnends site closure following post--remedial-groundwater monitoring: Based on previous site assessment data provided by AJE, Horizon estimates that the volumes of impacted soils in plume #1 (west of the former UST cluster in the northern portion of the site), plume #2 (near the existing dispensers), and plume #3 (near the former western dispenser) are 2,000, 400, and 50 cubic yards, respectively. Passive remediation would allow impacted soil to continue to impact groundwater for a relatively long time period. Excavation and disposal involves the removal and transportation of impacted soils off-site to a Class I or II landfill or thermal destruction facility. Non-impacted soil and imported fill would be used as backfill. Horizon estimates that this option would cost approximately $165,000 to $185,000. Excavation and aboveground treatment would involve mixing excavat,ed soil with a bio-innoculent and spreading soils three feet thick over the site. The soil would be periodically turned to facilitate mixing. The treated soils would be disposed of at a landfill or used as backfill. This method requires adequate surface area and time (up to 180) days. Estimated costs for this option is approximately $145,000 to $165,000. - r -Hori~ori ~o-n-si-d'e~ passive g~d-W~iter-re-medi~ttion ~o b-~-fe-~ibl~-i~'i~/t~ted-~ils, Which are -tile secondary source of groundwater impact, were removed. In-sku bioremediation, which includes the stimulation of microorganisms by introduction of oxygen and nutrients through reactive wails and trenches. Horizon considers this alternative to be more expensive than passive remediation and unnecessary at the site. o . Comments Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: We concur with Horizon that soil excavation and disposal and passive groundwater remediation are feasible remedial options. However, we will not approve these remedial options until review of detailed specifications for the proposed remediation. We also note that the feasibility and cost of reusing some or V:\UGTXPrqjectsUDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck CAP 3-03.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 19 March 2003 all of the excavated soil as roadbase (or other reuse) was not evaluated. We request that you submit a CAP addendum to address the above items. The CAP Addendum should also include an excavation plan (including a map depicting excavation boundaries), confirmation soil sampling and analysis plan, transport and disposal information (including a route map), post-remedial monitoring plan, and a HeaJth and Safety Plan. We request that you submit the CAP Addendum by 21 May 2003. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 The Fresno office relocated to 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 on 4 November 2002. Our main telephone number of (559) 445-5116 and fax number of (559) 445-5910 will remain the same, as will telephone numbers of staff. Please direct correspondence to our new address. JOHN D. WHITING' Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Howard Wines III, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, BakersfieldN, Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental V:\UGT~Pro, iects~JDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck CAP 3-03.doc California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental lnternet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5l 16 · FAX' (559) 445-5910 28 February 2003 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000447 Mr. Robert Fishburn Ultramar, Inc. - - - - 525 W. Third Street Hanford, CA 93232 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE AT BEACON STATION NO. 596, 3225 BUCK OWENS DRIVE (PIERCE ROAD), BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Fourth Quarter 2002 (Monitoring Report) dated 3 February 2003 and prepared by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon). The Monitoring Report presents data collected during a monitoring event conducted on 15 October 2002. During a meeting with you and Horizon personnel during February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation of the high concentrations of diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons detected in one monitoring well. High concentrations of diesel-range hydrocarbons were detected again this quarter. We request that groundwater monitoring continue. By our letters dated 3 September and 10 December 2002, we requested that you analyze groundwater samples for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This analysis has not been conducted. We reiterate our request to analyze for PAHs. A summary of the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Monitoring Report Summary Doulos Environmental Company conducted the Fourth Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring event on 15 October 2002. Depth-to-water measurements and groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-7. Depth-to-groundwater during the monitoring event ranged from 28.55 to 28.92 feet below the top of the casings (feet TOC). The water table elevation increased approximately 0.35 feet since the last monitoring event. Horizon calculated groundwater flow direction to be toward the southwest. Groundwater samples were submitted to Kiff Analytical, Davis (Kiff), a hazardous waste laboratory certified by the State of California. Samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8260B and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) by EPA method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA method 8260B. TPH-g and TPH-d were detected in MW-6 at 390 and 45,000 micrograms per California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a l/st of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Robert Fishburn 2 28 February 2003 liter gg/L, respectively, this quarter. TPH-d concentrations detected in MW-6 increased from 32,000 gg/L during the Fourth Quarter of 2000 to 130,000, 230,000, 180,000, and 130,000 gg/L, during the First through Fourth Quarters of 2001, respectively. TPH-d was detected in MW-6 at 60,000, 29,000, and 100,000 gg/L during the First through Third Quarters of 2002, respectively. TPH-d was detected in MW-7 at 300 }.tg/L. Benzene was detected in MW-6 at 0.60 gg/L. In accordance with AB 2886, Kiff has uploaded analytical data to GeoTracker. Horizon has uploaded monitoring well groundwater elevation data (GEO_WELL files). Horizon provides GEO_WELL upload confirmation sheets (screenshot) files for this and the previous four quarters of monitoring. Horizon recommends that the Regional Board grant site closure since the gasoline plume has been previously remediated and diesel concentrations contin_ue to de_c_re_.ase .... - - ~-~ ......... Comments TPH-d concentrations greater than 100,000 gg/L were detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-6 during the First through Fourth Quarters of 2001. TPH-d concentrations detected in MW-6 then decreased to 60,000 and 29,000 gg/L during the First and Second Quarters of 2002, respectively. During our meeting with you and Horizon personnel on 21 February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation to determine the source of the elevated diesel concentrations. We indicated that we would consider site closure following our review of the Third Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring data from MW-5 through MW-7. A high TPH-d concentration (100,000 gg/L) was again detected in MW-6 during the Third Quarter 2002 monitoring event. The TPH-d concentration detected in MW-7 also increased by one order of magnitude during the Third Quarter 2002 event. TPH-d was detected at 45,000 gg/L during the Fourth Quarter 2002. MW-6 is downgradient of the present and former diesel UST systems based on the predominant groundwater flow directions calculated during the monitoring history. The source of TPH-d detected in MW-6 and MW-7 may be a diesel release from the new UST system subsequent to the 1997 system installation, or impacted soils remaining after remediati0n (excavation) prior to the new system installation. Based on the continued detection of high TPH-d concentrations in MW-6 and the uncertainty as to the source of the TPH-d being found, we do not grant closure. We request that you continue to conduct quarterly groundwater monitoring. Please submit the results of the First Quarter 2003 monitoring event by 12 May 2003. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M and TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE by EPA Method 8260B. The PAHs fluorene and phenanthrene were detected in MW-6 at 27 and 44 }.tg/L, respectively during the Second Quarter 2002 monitoring event. By our letters dated 3 September and 10 December 2002, we requested that the sample collected from MW-6 be analyzed for PAHs by EPA Method 8270. Our review of the Fourth Quarter 2002 monitoring data indicates that this analysis has not been conducted. We reiterate our request that you perform this analysis. We cannot consider site closure until further investigation of PAHs in groundwater has been conducted. V:\UGTXProjects\JDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\Beacon #596 GW 2-03.doc Mr. Robert Fishburn 3 28 February 2003 Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento '~ -Mr. -Howard Wines 1II, Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfiei'dO Mr. Rexford Smith, Horizon Environmental Inc., E1 Dorado Hills V:\UGTXProjectsklDW_files\2003 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\Beacon #596 GW 2-03.doc .California Regionalcentral'WatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX'(559) 445-5910 14 January 2003 RWQCB Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona '85308 EXTENSION REQUEST, UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted a letter dated 13 January 2003 requesting an extension for submission of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The letter was prepared by AJ Environmental, Inc., Bakersfield (AJE). We requested submission of the CAP by our letter dated 30 October 2002. CAP preparation was delayed by the non-response of a consultant contacted to perform this service. We understand that you will contract with another consultant. AJE will conduct groundwater monitoring event #7 on 5 February 2003. AJE will submit the CAP by 15 February 2003. We grant your request for an extension. The CAP is now due by 15 February 2003. Should you have questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup.Fund, Sacramento ~ , Mr. Howard Wines BI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfieldq Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, et al, LLP, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 30 December 2002 eS~jf_.. ?/! S~/O ~ RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Chiles H. Jimerson 520TW~Pi~K9~fiu~ Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK P~ZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You sub~tted Holden Truck Stop Groundwater Monitoring Report ~6 (Monitoring Report) dated December 2002 and trans~tted by a cover letter dated 18 December 2002. A J Environment~ of Bakersfield (AJE) prepped the Monitoring Report. The Monitoring Report documents a qu~terly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 5 November 2002. We request that queerly groundwater monitoring be continued. We reiterate our request that you sub~t a Co~ective Action Plan (CAP) for soil and groundwater. A su~ of the Monitoring Report and our co~ents follow. Monitoring Report Summary AJE performed the sixth (Fourth Queer 2002) groundwater monitoring event on 5 November 2002. Depth to groundwater ranged from 26.82 to 29.02 feet below the tops of the well casings (below TOC). AJE c~culated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be west (S81W) and the gradient to be 29.9 feet per ~le (0.006 feet per foot). Groundwater elevation has decreased by approximately 0.3 foot since ~h~j~s~.(~ug~st~0p~) monitoring event._ ~ Groundwater staples were collected from monitoring wells GW-1 t~ough GW-4. The samples were ~yzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015; and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, ~d methyl tertiaw butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8020. TPH-d ~d TPH-g were detected in MW-1 at 650 ~d 51 ~crograms per liter (g~), respectively. TPH-d was ~so detected in (~ the downgradient well, ~gg~. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, ~d MTB were not~ detected. TPH-d was detected in the staples collected from monitoring wells~and~at~ ~~gg~, respectively, during the last monitoring event. Co~en~ We request that qu~erl~ groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next queerly monitoring event should be ~yzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M ~d BTEX by EPA Method 8020. California Environmental Protec~on Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 30 December 2002 By our letter dated 30 October 2002, we indicated th~io~appears to be a feasible remedial option and requested that your consultant develop a Correct'ive Action Plan (CAP) for soil and groundwater evaluating the feasibility and cost effectiveness of remedial options, including excavation with both on-site treatment and off-site disposal or reuse, and "no further action." We remind you that the CAP is due by 15 January 2003. Please contact this office at least five days prior to fieldwork. Should you have questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 : The Fresno office relocated to 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 on 4 November 2002. Our main telephone number of (559) 445-5116 and fax number of (559) 445-5910 will remain the same, as will telephone numbers of staff. Please direct correspondence to our new address. JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Howard Wines BI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield V:[UGT~ProjectskJDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CasesLHoldnTrckGW 12-02.doc California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Winston H. Hickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 10 December 2002 tot9 ~ a>~c~ '~ ~c,9 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000447 Mr. Robert Fishburn ' Ultramar, Inc. 525 W. Third Street Hanford, CA 93232 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE AT BEACON STATION NO. 596, 3225 BUCK OWENS DRIVE (PIERCE ROAD), BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Third Quarter 2002 (Monitoring Report) dated 31 October 2002 and prepared by Horizon Environmental, Inc., E1 Dorado Hills (Horizon). The Monitoring Report presents data collected during a monitoring event conducted on 24 July 2002. During a meeting with you and Horizon personnel during February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation of the high concentrations of diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons detected in one monitoring well. High concentrations of diesel-range hydrocarbons were detected again this quarter. We request that groundwater monitoring continue. Summaries of the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Monitoring Report Summary Doulos Environmental Company conducted the Third Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring event on 24 July 2002. Depth-to-water measurements and groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-7. Depth-to-groundwater during the monitoring event ranged from 28.87 to 29.30 feet below the top of the casings (feet TOC). The water table elevation declined approximately 0.15 feet since the 23 April 2002 monitoring event. Horizon calculated groundwater flow direction to be. toward the southwest. Groundwater samPles were submitted to Kiff Analytical, Davis (Kiff), a hazardous waste laboratory certified by the State of California. Samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) by EPA method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA method 8260B. TPH-g and TPH-d were detected in MW-6 at 330 and 100,000 micrograms per liter txg/L, respectively, this quarter. TPH-g and TPH-d were detected at 1,700 and 29,000 gg/L, respectively, during the Second Quarter 2002, and were detected at 4,500 and 60,000 gg/L, respectively; during the First Quarter 2002. TPH-d concentrations California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-sito at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Robert Fishburn - 2 - 10 December 2002 detected in MW-6 increased from 32,000 lAg/L during the Fourth Quarter of 2000 to 130,000, 230,000, 180,000, and 130,000 gg/L, during the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Quarters of 2001, respectively. TPH-d was detected in MW-7 at 2,700 gg/L. During the last seven quarterly monitoring events, TPH-d has been detected in MW-6 at less than 700 gg/L. Benzene was detected in MW-6 at 1.0 gg/L. Horizon recommends that the Regional Board grant site closure and that the remaining monitoring wells be destroyed. Comments TPH-d concentrations greater than 100,000 gg/L were detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-6 during the First through Fourth Quarters of 2001. TPH-d concentrations detected in MW-6 then decreased4o-60~000~and- 2-9;000~tg/L-during-the-First- and Second-Quarters: of 20027T6s~fi¥--dl~:-D~-Yi~g our meeting with you and Horizon personnel on 21 February 2002, we agreed to postpone investigation to determine the source of the elevated diesel concentrations. We indicated that we would consider site closure following our review of the Third Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring data from MW-5 through MW-7. A high TPH-d concentration (100,000 tAg/L) was again detected in MW-6 during the Third Quarter 2002 monitoring event. The TPH-d concentration detected in MW-7 also increased by one order of magnitude during the Third Quarter 2002 event. MW-6 is downgradient of the present and former diesel UST systems based on the predominant groundwater flow directions calculated during the monitoring history. The source of TPH-d detected in MW-6 and MW-7 may be a diesel release from the new UST system subsequent to the 1997 system installation, or impacted soils remaining after remediation (excavation) prior to the new system installation. Based on the continued detection of high TPH-d concentrations in MW-6 and the uncertainty as to the source of the TPH-d being found, we do not grant closure. We request that you continue to conduct quarterly groundwater monitoring. If you have operation records suggesting a release from the new diesel UST system, we request that you submit them. Please submit the results of the Fourth Quarter 2002 monitoring event by 10 February 2003. Groundwater sa.__m_ plcs sh_ould be an_alyz__e_d_f0r_TEH:g and_TP_H=d_byEPA-Method 8015M-and BTEX-and MTBI~'~ EPA Method 8260B. The PAHs fluorene and phenanthrene were detected in MW-6 at 27 and 44 gg/L, respectively during the Second Quarter 2002 monitoring event. By our letter dated 3 September 2002, we requested that the sample collected from MW-6 be analyzed for PAHs by EPA Method 8270. This analysis should be conducted during the Fourth Quarter 2002 monitoring event. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and.Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter, we have not received the required electronic data submissions for your site. V:\UGTXProjectsUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases'~Beacon #596 GW 11-02.doc Mr. Robert Fishburn ~ 3 - 10 December 2002 Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: ~Ms:-Barbara-Reinpel, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacrament6,-w?o en'~10sure o~sur'b~ Mr. Howard Wines llI, Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o encl Mr. Rexford Smith, Horizon Environmental Inc,, E1 Dorado Hills, w/enclosure V:\UGTLProjects\JDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\Beacon #596 GW 11-02.doc 0 California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox , ,, Gray Davis Secretaryfbr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://wWW.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 30 October 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Site Characterization Report #3 (Assessment Report) dated 10 October 2002 and prepared by A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The Assessment Report presents the results of further investigation to determine the vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in the northern portion of the site. The Assessment Report recommends the exCavation of imPacted soils and provides estimates of the volume of impacted soils and the costs of excavation. We request tha~ you submit a Corrective Action Plan evaluating remedial options.' .we presently do not request that you install a downgradient monitoring well on the west side of State Highway 99. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue. Summaries of the Assessment Report, and the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Project Summary The site is approximately 3,000 feet north of the Kern River and approximately 2,700 feet south- southwest of the Kern Water Agency office and recharge pond: The site. is e_.ast of State Highway 99 and west of Buck Owens Boulevard. A cluster of gasoline and diesel USTs were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985. The USTS and associated dispensers and piping were removed during 1998. Subsequent investigation identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume (and the only plume that appears to have reached groundwater) extends southwest from the former UST cluster. Impacted soil extends at least to the water table (approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs)). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 10,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were detected in soil samples. A TPH-dconcentration of _'..20 mg/kg was..d~te.ct.e,d .al. 17 feet bgs in:b. oring GW-4, near the.western.site boundary: During the 23 January 2002 monitoring event:, a TPH-d concentration of 4;300 micrograms -per 'litbr (gg/L) Was detected in' monitoring wel},GW-1 (near the former USTs).and aTPH-d ~oncentration of 2,700 gg/L was detected in monitoring .well GW-4. The lateral and vertical exten't 6f impacted soil and the lateral extent Of impacted groundwater have not been.defined. A more detailed project history is inclu~led' ih our letter dated 21 March 2002 and other previous Fetters. ' California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 30 October 2002 Assessment Report Summary AYE ~6nfirmed the vertical extent of impacted soils in the northern portion of the site by drilling and sampling one soil b.or. ing (S-17) on 5 August 2002. Boring S-17 was drilled within the impacted soils' west (downgradient) of the former UST cluster and southwest of monitoring well GW-1. Samples were collected continuously at two-foot intervals from 25 to 42 feet below ground surface (bgs) except that the sample collected from 32 to 34 feet bgs was lost. All soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8020. ~ _JE.l_qg_aged _soils s_ampJe_d d. uriqg the investig_ation ~go~ar_s_e_-.,_me~dium_-_,_and_fine=grained.sand, gravel,. and minor clayey sand and sandy clay. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of app?oximately 28.5 feet bgs. A sharp contact between (discolored) impacted soil and non-impacted soil was discovered at the water table. TPH-d was detected in the sample from 28 to 28.5 feet bgs at 5,800 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). TPH-g was detected at 75 mg/kg in this sample.. Concentrations of toluene and xylenes less than 1 mg/kg were also detected. TPH-d was detected at 29 rog/kg in the sample collected from 35 feet bgs. No other analytes were detected in the samples collected from 30, 35, and 38 feet bgs.' Based on this and previous investigations, AJE described impacted soils in the northern portion of the site as a wedge 45 feet wide by 115 feet long by 20 feet thick. AYE recommends soil remediation by excavation. AJE estimates that 3,600 cubic yards of'~verlying uncontaminated soil would need to be removed and stockpiled on-site. Approxi.mately 1,960 cubic yards of impacted soils would be removed and transported off-site to a State-Certified Disposal faCility. The excavation wouldbe'backfilled with the stockpiled uncontaminated soil and imported fill. AJE estimates that soil remediation could be completed in ten working days at a cost of approximately $165,000. Comments Excavation appears to be a feasible remedial option. Your consultant will need to develop a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for soil and groundwater evaluating the feasibility and cost effective_n_ess of_re_medial options', including-eX'~aVati6n wiih'bo~h-6h--~i-t~-~i:~itl:nent and off-'~i'te disposal or reuse, and "no further action." Please submit the CAP by 15 January 2003. By our letter dated 4 October 2002, we requested that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. Analysis for volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260 and base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270 may be discontinued. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN may also be discontinued. By our letter dated 28 June 2002 we approved the installation of one additional downgradient monitoring well on the west side of the State Highwa~f 99 right-of-way. Based on your proposal to remediate the site, we do not presently request installation of this monitoring well. We will determine the necessity of an additional monitoring well based on future groundwater monitoring data. U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 10-02.doe Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 3 30 October 2002 Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit 'analytical and site data electronic.ally. Enclosed is our le[ter (Required Electronic-Deliverable Format for LabOratory and Site D~tta SUbmittals''to Regulating~Agqncies).explaining how to obtain information'to implement the .requirements. Effective 4 November 2002, the Fresno office will relocate to' 1685 E. Street, Suite 100, Fresno, California 93706-2025. Our main telephone number of (559) 445-5116 and fax number of (559) 445- 5910 will remain the same, as will telephone numbers of staff. Please direct future correspondence to our new address. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 Enclosures: · Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: · 'Ms.. Barbara Rempel, swRcBi'UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure ~ Mr. Howard Wines 13I, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield; w/o enclosur-'e~ Mrl J0~hn Iyy, San Joaqui. n .Bank, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosure U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 10-02.doc California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Winston H. Hickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 4 October 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Groundwater Monitoring Report #5 (Monitoring Report) dated September 2002 and transmitted by a cover letter dated 12 September 2002. A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE) prepared the Monitoring Report. The Monitoring Report documents a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 5 August'2002. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring be continued. We understand that you are considering excavation as a remedial option. We request that you submit information, concerning the volume and cost of excavation. We do not request a work plan to evaluate in-situ remedial options at this time. A report of findings for additional site investigation and monitoring well installations should be submitted. Summaries of the project and the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Project Summary The site is approximately 3,000 feet north of the Kern River and approximately 2,700 feet south- southwest of the Kern Water .Agency office and recharge pond.. The site is east of State Highway 99 and west of Buck Owens Boulevard. A duster of gasoline and diesel USTs were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985. The USTs and associated dispensers and piping were removed during 1998. Subsequent investigation identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume (and the only plume that appears to have reached groundwater) extends southwest from the former UST duster. Impacted soil extends at least to the water table (approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs)). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 10,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were detected in soil samples. A TPH-d concentration of 120 mg/kg was detected at 17 feet bgs in boring GW-4, near the western site boundary. During the 23 January 2002 monitoring event, a TPH-d concentration of 4,300 micrograms per liter (~g/L) was' detected in monitoring Well GW- 1 (near the former USTs) and a TPH~d cOncentratiOn of 2,700 pg/L was detected in monitoring w~ll GW-4. The lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil and the lateral extent of impacted groundwater have not been defined. A more detailed project history is included in our letter dated 21 March 2002 and other previous letters. - California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 4 October 2002 Monitoring Report Summary 'AJE performed the fourth (Third Quarter 2002) groundwater monitoring event on 5 August 2002. Depth to groundwater ranged from 26.36 to 28.76 feet below the tops of the casings. AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be west (S87W) and the gradient to be 32 feet per mile (0.007 feet per foot). Groundwater elevation has decreased approximately 1 foot since the last (25 April 2002) monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells GW-1 through GW-4. The samples were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and MTBE by EPA Method 8020, volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260, and general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). The monitoring well with the highest TPH-d concentration (GW-4) was resampled and analyzed for base neutral and acid extrac_t~ble_o~rg~ic compounds-by-EPA M-eth6i:l 82707-TPHZg andBTEX ~-ei:e' hb~ ~f~d~.-~l'P~-d'-w-~s detected in the samples collected from monitoring wells GW-1 and GW-4 at 710 and 850 micrograms per liter (gg~L). TPH-d concentrations from GW-1 and GW-4 during the last monitoring event were 5,400 and 4,400 gg/L, respectively. Electrical conductivity ranged from 266 to 232 micrornhos per centimeter (gmhos/cm). Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 190 to 224 milligrams per liter~(mg/L). Bicarbonate ranged from non-detected to 120 mg/L. Nitrate (as NO3) was detected at concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 3.6 mg/L. TKN was not detected to 0.77 mg/L. Comments We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020. Analysis for volatile organic compounds by EPA M~ethod 8260 and base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270 may be discontinued. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN may also be discontinued. By our letter dated 29 May 2002, we requested that a work plan for testing the feasibility of in-situ remedial options be submitted by 31 July 2002. We provided an extension until 18 September 2002 for the work plan by our letter dated 5 August 2002. We requested the work plan based on our concern that the~cost-of remediation-by-excavation-might be exeessive and mi-ght not-be reimbursed by-the-Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund. AJE has indicated to us that excavation may be a feasible remedial option. We will consider excavation upon review of additional information, specifically, the volume of impacted soils and estimated cost. Please submit a letter providing this information by 31 October 2002. We do not request that you submit the work plan for testing the feasibility of in-sim remedial options at this time. U:\UGT~JDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases'tHoldnTrckGW 9-02.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 4 October 2002 Please contact this office at least five days prior to fieldwork. Should you have questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 . . JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento ~ , Mr. Howard Wines 1II, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield'',~ Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield ~ ..... - . ~.': Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CaseskHoldnTrckGW 9-02.doc California R ional Water Quality ntrol Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 5 August 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 EXTENSION REQUEST, UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted a letter dated 2 August 2002 requesting an extension for submission of a work plan to determine the feasibility of in-situ soil and groundwater remedial options (remedial feasibility work plan). The letter was prepared by AJ Environmental, Inc., Bakersfield (AJE). We requested submission of the remedial feasibility work plan by our letter dated 21 March 2002. Submission of the remedial feasibility work plan is currently delayed because legal representation for San Joaquin Bank is waiting for pre-approval of work plan costs from the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund (Fund). A date for pre-approval has not been provided by the Fund. AJE will conduct groundwater monitoring event #5 on 5 August 2002 and will perform further site investigation to determine the vertical extent of impacted soils on 9 August 2002. We grant your request for an extension. The work plan is now due by 18 September 2002. Should you have questions or co .mments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento '~ Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfieldx,~ Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, et al, LLP, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency 0 Recycled Paper Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis SecretaryJbr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 23 July 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue -Glendale,-Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Groundwater Monitoring Report #4 (Monitoring Report) dated June 2002 and transmitted by a cover letter dated 29 June 2002. A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE) prepared the Monitoring Report. The Monitoring Report documents a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 25 April 2002. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue and that a work plan to evaluate in-situ remedial options and a report of findings for additional site inVestigation and monitoring well installations be submitted. Summaries of the project and the Monitoring Report and our comments follow. Project Summary The site is approximately 3,000 feet north of the Kern River and approximately 2,700 feet south- southwest of the Kern Water Agency office and recharge pond. The site is east of State Highway 99 and west of Buck Owens Boulevard. A cluster of gasoline and diesel USTs were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985. The USTs and associated dispensers and piping were removed during 1998. Subsequent investigation identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume (and the only plume that apPe~ars to have-reached groundwater) extends southwest from the former UST cluster. Impacted soil extends at least to the water table.(approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs)). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 10,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were detected in soil samples. A TPH-d concentration of 120 mg/kg was detected at 17 feet bgs in boring GW-4, near the western site boundary. During the 23 January 2002 monitoring event, a TPH-d concentration of 4,300 micrograms per liter (gg/L) was detected in monitoring well GW-1 (near the former USTs) and a TPH-d concentration of 2,700 gg/L was detected in monitoring well GW-4. The lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil and the lateral extent of impacted groundwater have not been defined. A more detailed project history is included in our letter dated 21 March 2002 and other previous letters. California Environmental Protection Agency 0 Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 23 July 20(J~'~ ,,,-, Monitoring Report Summary AJE performed the fourth (Second Quarter 2002) groundwater monitoring event on 25 April 2002. Depth to groundwater ranged from 25.55 to 27.81 feet below the tops of the casings. AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be west-southwest (S65W) and the gradient to be 21.8 feet per mile (0.004 feet per foot). Groundwater elevation has increased approximately 2.5 feet since the first monitoring event on 17 July 2001. Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells GW-1 through GW-4. The samples were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and MTBE by EPA Method 8020, volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260, and general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). The monitoring well with the highest TPH-d concentration (GW-1) was resampled and analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic _ compounds by~EP_A Method 8270. TPH_-g_a__n_d BTEX were not detected. TPH-d~was_d_e_t_e_c_t_e.d_in_the___. samples collected from moriitoring wells GW-1 and GW-4 at 5,400 and 4,400 micrograms per liter (gg/L), respectively. Sec-butylbenzene was detected in GW- 1 at 0.63 }.tg/L by EPA Method 8260. Electrical conductivity ranged from 340 to 395 micromhos per centimeter (gmhos/cm). Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 214 to 230 milligrams per liter (mg/L). Bicarbonate and calcium ranged from 92 to 180 mg/L and 31 to 38 mg/L, respectively. Nitrate (as NO3) was detected at concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 8.63 mg/L. TKN was detected at concentrations from 0.3 to 0.6 mg/L. Comments We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260. The sample with the highest detected TPH-d concentration should also be analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN should be conducted one additional quarter on one upgradient and two downgradient monitoring wells during the next quarterly monitoring event. By our letter dated 21 March 2002, we noted that the report of groundwater analysis for general minerals did not include results for alkalinity, hardness, iron, and manganese. We requested that these analytes be reported for the next monitoring event. Based on the analytical reports included in the Monitoring -Report,-t-hese-analy~es-were-again not-inctuded-i.n the report-of-geneml-mi.neral-anal-ysis.---W~-request-that results of analyses for iron, and manganese be included during the next monitoring event. Please have your consultant contact the laboratory to insure that these analyses are performed. If the laboratory is unable to perform these analyses, please contact this office prior to the next monitoring event. By our letter dated 29 May 2002, we requested that a work plan for testing the feasibility of in-situ remedial options be submitted by 31 July 2002.. We approved additional site assessment and off-site monitoring well installation by our letter dated 28 June 2002. A report of findings for this work is due by 5 September.2002. U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldnTrckGW 7-02.doc ~-~ z '~r. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 23 July 2002 Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 JOHN D~ WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosures: Guidelines for General Minerals Analysis Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... - -- cc: Ms: Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosures Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure'S'-~ Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, w/enclosures Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield, w/enclosures Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosures U:\UGT~JDW_filesL2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CasesLHoldnTrckGW 7-02.doc California Regional Water Quality oo ntrol Board Central Valley Region ~ Winston H. Hickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (.559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 28 June 2002 Regional Board Case No. 5T 15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Work, Health, and Safety Plan (Work Plan) dated 6 June 2002 and prepared by A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The Addendum proposes additional investigation of the vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil near the former underground storage tank (UST) cluster and the installation of one additional groundwater monitoring well off-site to confirm the lateral extent of impacted groundwater. We conditionally approve the proposed investigation and monitoring well installation. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. The proposed downgradient monitoring well should be added to the monitoring network. The analytical program for the proposed off-site monitoring well should be expanded during one monitoring event. Summaries of the Project and the Work Plan, and our comments follow. Summary of the Proiect The site is approximately 3,000 feet north of the Kern River and approximately 2,700 feet south- southwest of the Kern Water Agency office and recharge pond. The site is bounded on the west by State Highway 99 and on the east by Buck Owens Boulevard. A cluster of gasoline and diesel USTs were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985. The USTs and associated dispensers and piping were removed during 1998. Subsequent investigation identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume (and the only plume that appears to have reached groundwater) extends southwest from the former UST cluster. Impacted soil extends at least to the water table (approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs)). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 10,000 milligrams per kilogram (rog/kg) were detected in soil samples. A TPH-d concentration of 120 rog/kg was detected at 17 feet bgs in boring GW-4, near the western site boundary. During the 23 January.2002 monitoring event, a TPH-d concentration of 4,300 micrograms per liter ([tg/L) was detected in monitoring well GW- 1 (near the former USTs) and a TPH-d concentration of 2,700 gg/L was detected in monitoring well GW-4. The lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil and the lateral extent of impacted groundwater have not been defined. A more detailed project history is included in our letter dated 21 March 2002 and.other previous letters. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 28 June 200?~ Summary of the Work Plan AJE proposes a scope of work to determine the vertical extent of impacted soils below the water table and determine the extent of impacted groundwater. Depth to water is expected to be approximately 25 feet bgs. The vertical extent of impacted soils will be determined by drilling and sampling one soil boring (S-17) approximately 10 feet southwest of monitoring well GW-1. Drilling and sampling will be conducted with standard hollow-stem auger and split-spoon sampler technology. Soil samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8020. Monitoring well GW-5 will be installed off-site on the west side of State Highway 99 at the end of Getty Street. The well location was chosen based on groundwater flow direction determined during three 3~evio~us monitoring events ~-fi~-was constrained by the presence of a building north of Getty Street. Monitoring well GW-5 will be a standard-construction 2-inch diameter monitoring well installed by hollow-stem auger technology. Monitoring well GW-5 will be screened from 10 to 50 feet bgs. The casing elevation will be surveyed in relation to existing benchmarks on-site. GW-5 will be sampled for TPH-g and TPH-d, and BTEX and MTBE. Comments to the Work Plan Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: We conditionally approve the proposed investigation to determine vertical extent of impacted soils by drilling and sampling one soil boring. Near and below the water table, soil samples may be collected at an interval between 2 and 5 feet, at your consultant's discretion. A 2-foot sampling interval may be useful to determine moisture conditions as the water table is approached. The vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the water table should be determined by field observation and the analysis of two consecutive samples lacking field evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons. We approve the installation of downgradient monitoring well GW-5 off-site on the west side of State Highway 99. GW-5 should be included in the facility monitoring network. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020 or 8260. Samples with detectable TPH-d should again be analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. We request that you expand the analytical program for GW-5 during one sampling event in an effort to characterize groundwater quality west of State Highway 99 and provide a baseline for future monitoring events. The expanded analytical program should be conducted during the first quarterly monitoring event at least one month after installation of GW-5. The expanded analytical program analyses are: TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX and MTBE by EPA 8020 or 8260, and ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) by ]EPA Method 8260, and U:\UGT~JDW_files\2002 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases'd-IoldenTruck WP 6-02.doc M~,,.Charles H. Jimerson - 3 28 June 2002 alcohol (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) by EPA Method 8260, and the analytes generally reported for a full EPA Method 8260 analysis (usually 63 to 67 analytes). If TPH-d is detected, the sample should be analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. The sample should also be analyzed for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Provided you incorporate the above comments, we approve the scope of work proposed in the Work Plan. Please submit a report of findings for the investigation and monitoring well installation by 5 September 2002. By our letter dated 29 May 2002, we provided an extension for submission of a work plan for testing the feasibility of in-situ remedial options. The results of feasibility testing will be incorporated into a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). We remind you that the work plan is now due by 31 July 2002. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter we have not received the required electronic data submissions for your site. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 ' JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... c: Mr: Howard-Wines III, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosur'~e Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosure U:\UGT~JDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck WP 6-02.doc O California RSonalcentraiWatervalleyQUalitYRegion ntrol Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 29 May 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue · Glendale, Arizona 85308 EXTENSION REQUEST, UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted a letter dated 23 May 2002 requesting an extension for submission of a work plan to determine the feasibility of in-situ soil and groundwater remedial options (remedial feasibility work plan). The letter was prepared by AJ Environmental, Inc., Bakersfield (AJE). We requested submission of the remedial feasibility work plan by our letter dated 21 March 2002. Submission of the remedial feasibility work plan has been delayed by AJE's search for subcontractors and by attorney reviews. AJE has submitted requests for proposals to three environmental consulting companies. Bids are expected by 21 June 2002. AJE expects to submit the remedial feasibility work plan by 31 July 2002. We grant the requested extension. The remedial feasibility work plan is due by 31 July 2002. By our letter dated 21 March 2002 we also requested that you submit a brief work plan proposing soil sampling to verify the vertical extent of impacted soils and the installation of one downgradient monitoring well (site investigation work plan). The site investigation work plan was due by 10 June 2002. We assume that AJE will not subcontract preparation of this work plan. We will provide an extension for submission of the site investigation work plan. The site investigation work plan is now due by 27 June 2002. Should you have questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 Associate Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 c: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento · Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary.[?~r Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 21 March 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000865 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson · 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Site Characterization Report #2 (Assessment Report) dated 7 February 2002 and Holden Truck Stop Groundwater Monitoring Report #3 (Monitoring Report) dated 25 February 2002. A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE) prepared the reports. The Assessment Report presents the results of further investigation to determine the extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater at a former underground storage tank (UST) cluster in the northern portion of the site and to determine the presence and extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils beneath a former UST in the southern portion.of the site. The Monitoring Report describes the results of a quarterly groundwater monitoring event performed on 23 January 2002. We request that work plans to verify the vertical extent of impacted soils and to further define the lateral extent of impacted groundwater be submitted. We also request that you submit a work plan for testing the feasibility of in-situ remedial options for soil and groundwater prior to submission of a Corrective Action Plan. The work plan should include a plan to assess the dissolved oxygen concentrations and bioremediation potential of the groundwater. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue. Summaries of the project, the Assessment Report, and the Monitoring Report and our comments follow.. Summary of the Pro,ject A cluster of two diesel USTs and two gasoline USTs with associated dispensers and piping were installed in the northern portion of the site during 1985 and were taken out of service before 1998. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) was detected in soil samples collected beneath the USTs and dispensers during removal in 1998. Subsequent investigations conducted during June 2001 by AJE identified three plumes of soil impacted by TPH-d and demonstrated that groundwater beneath the site had been impacted. TPH-d concentrations up to 22,000 milligrams per liter (mg/kg) were detected in soil samples. The only plume that appears to have impacted groundwater is at the former UST cluster. The lateral extent of this plume to the west and southwest was not defined by the June 2001 investigation. AJE installed three groundwater monitoring wells (GW-1 through GW-3) during June 2001. TPH-d has been detected in samples collected from GW-1, west of the former UST cluster, California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Rec~ycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 2 - 21 March 2002 during two previous monitoring events at concentrations up to 2,500 micrograms per liter (gg/L) but has not been detected in the other monitoring wells. One diesel UST discovered in the southern portion of the property was removed during July 2001. TPH-d concentrations up to 9,300 mg/kg were detected in soil samples collected beneath the UST during removal. More detailed project history is included in our letters dated 16 May, 14 November, and 14 December 2001. Summary of the Assessment Report Seven soil borings were drilled and sampled on-site under the Shpervision of AJE personnel on 11 to 20 December 2001. Five borings were drilled west and southwest of the former UST cluster in the northern portion of the site to further investigate the lateral extent of impacted soils. One of the five borings was completed as a standard-construction 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring well downgradient of the former USTs. AJE also drilled and~sam_ml~le_d_t_.w_o_s_oiLb, orings_to_determine~the~presence~and-extent~of-- petroleum hydrocarbons in soils beneath the recently removed diesel UST in the southern portion of the site. AJE personnel collected soil samples for logging and submission to the laboratory and directed monitoring well construction. Soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020, and volatile organic compounds, including BTEX, the fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary amyl methyl alcohol (TAME), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA). AJE logged soils encountered in the borings as coarse- to fine-grained sand, gravel with a coarse sand matrix, and minor clayey sand and sandy clay. TPH-d concentrations up to 5,700 mg/kg were detected in soil samples collected from the borings west and southwest of the former UST cluster. TPH-d concentrations attenuated one order of magnitude from 26 feet below ground surface (bgs) to 30 feet bgs, the deepest sample collected in boring S-13. TPH-d concentrations detected in the deepest samples from borings S-14 through S-16 attenuated less than an order of magnitude or did not attenuate. TPH-d was detected at 120 mg/kg at 17 feet bgs and was not detected in deeper samples collected from boring S-17 (groundwater monitoring well GW-4). AJE interprets the lateral extent of impacted soils in the vicinity of the former UST cluster to be 45 feet northwest to southeast and 115 feet northeast to southwest. AJE estimated the thickness of impacted soil to be 20 feet. The volume of impacted soils was estimated to be 1,956 cubic yards. AJE did not identify a plume of impacted soil beneath the former diesel UST in the .... s'outhern-porti'on-o-f-th-e-site.--TPH--d-was-detecte~d-at ?20-arrd-8qrm-g/kg-at-6-and 10 fe'et 'bgsTrespectivety ...... in one borehole. TPH-d was not detected in the other soil samples collected from the two borings. Monitoring well GW-4 was constructed as a standard-construction 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring well screened from 10 to 50 feet bgs. Summary of the Monitoring Report The third quarterly groundwater monitoring event was conducted by AJE on 23 January 2002. Monitoring wells GW-1 through GW-4 were monitored. Depth to groundwater ranged from 22.35 to 25.90 feet below the top of the casings. The average elevation of the water table rose approximately 5.14 feet in GW-1 through GW-3 since the first (17 July 2001) quarterly monitoring event. AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be toward the southwest and the gradient to be 47.6 feet per mile (0.009 feet per foot). U:\UG'I'dDW_filesL2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 3-02.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 21 March 2002 Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015 and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8260. The sample collected from GW-1, the only sample with detected TPH-d, was also analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. Samples collected from GW-1 through GW-4 were also analyzed for general minerals, nitrate and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). TPH-g was detected in the sample collected from GW-1 at 71 micrograms per liter (gg/L). However, the analytical report indicates that the chromatogram is not typical of gasoline due to the presence of heavy hydrocarbons. TPH-d was detected in the samples colledted from GW- 1 (vicinity of the northern UST cluster) and GW-4 (downgradient of the northern UST cluster) at 4,300 and 2,700 gg/L, respectively. TPH-d was detected in GW-1 at 1,300 gg/L during the last monitoring event. BTEX were not detected. MTBE and sec-butylbenzene were detected in GW-1 at 1.0 and 0.56 gg/L, respectively, by EPA.Method 8260... Acenapthene, flourene and phenanthrene were detected in GW-1 at 3.1, 3.2, and 2.2 gg/L, respectively, by EPA Method 8270. Phenanthrene and bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were detected last quarter by EPA Method 8270 at 2.5 and 7.4 gg/L, respectively. Tetrachloroethene was detected in MW-2 (the upgradient well) at 0.92 gg/L. Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 212 to 284 milligram per liter (mg/L). Calcium ranged from 27 to 36 mg/L. Carbonate was not detected. Nitrate as NO3 ranged from 1.4 to 27.4 mg/L. TKN ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 mg/L. Comments to the Addendum and Monitoring Report Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: This and previous investigations have defined the approximate lateral extent of soil impacted by diesel- range petroleum hydrocarbons at the former UST cluster. A significant mass of impacted soils (approximately 2,000 cubic yards) continues to degrade groundwater quality. The lateral extent of impacted groundwater has not been defined. TPH-d was detected at 2,700 gg/L in the sample collected from downgradient monitoring well GW-4, approximately 140 feet downgradient of the former USTs. A significant mass of impacted soils does not appear to exist below the former diesel UST in the southern portion of the site. Your consultant will need to develop a COrrective Action Plan (CAP) for soil and groundwater. The CAP will evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of remedial options, including "no further action." However, prior to CAP development, we request that you submit a work plan for testing the feasibility of in-situ remedial options for soil (such as soil vapor extraction and bioventing) and groundwater (such as oxygen or air injection). The work plan should include a plan for assessing the dissolved oxygen concentrations and redox potential of the groundwater. The proposed assessment should attempt to identify areas where addition of oxygen could be used to stimulate biodegradation. The data generated by the feasibility testing will be incorporated into the CAP. Please submit the work plan by 10 June 2002. By our letter dated 14 December 2001, we requested that the full vertical extent of impacted soils be determined. However, TPH-d concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg were detected in the deepest soil samples collected from several borings. Although we do not expect impacted soils to extend a great distance below the water table, we request that you submit a brief work plan for additional soil sampling to verify the vertical extent. Please submit the work plan by 10 June 2002. The results of this investigation should be incorporated into the CAP. U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 3-02.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 4 21 March 2002 Please also submit a brief work plan for the installation of one additional downgradient monitoring well to determine the lateral extent of impacted groundwater. We anticipate that this monitoring well will be installed on the west side of the State Highway 99 right-of-way. Please submit the work plan by 10 June 2002, Please have your consultant contact us if installation of this well is not possible, due to access or other difficulties. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M. The samples should also be analyzed for BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260 and volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260. Samples with detectable TPH-d should also be analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN should also be included. We anticipate that the frequency of groundwater monitoring re_ay_ b_e~ r_ed~u_c, e~d ~te_r_ the_Llater_al_e_xte~ 9£gro_un_d~w_a.te_r~ has_b_ee_n_de_[errni_ned .... We note that the analysis of groundwater samples for general minerals did not include analyses for alkalinity, hardness, iron, and manganese. The analyses we request are listed in the enclosed information sheet Guidelines for General Minerals Analysis. Please insure that these analyses are performed during the next monitoring event. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 John D. Whiting Associate Engineering Geologist RG No.-595-1- Enclosures: Guidelines for General Minerals Analysis Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosures '"N . Mr. Howard Wines [[I, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosures'x4 Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, w/enclosures Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield, w/enclosures Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosures U:\UGT~JDW_files~2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CaseshttoldenTruck 3-02.doc State V ter Resources Control Board Division of Clean Water Programs 1001 I Street · Sacramento, Cali£omia 95814 Winston H. Hickox P.O. Box 944212 · Sacramento, California · 94244-2120 Secretary for (916) 341~5761 · FAX (916) 341-5806 , www.swrcb.ca.gov/cwphome/ustcf Gray Davis Environmental Governor Protection The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website at www. swrcb, ca.gov. . FEB 1 3 2002 Charles Jimerson Christopher P. Burger 5201 Piute Ave W Glendale, AZ 85308 ....... UNDERGROUND STORAGE-T- -ANK- CI~E-ANtzrP F-UND (FLrND)FC-L-AIM-NO: 0-t66-1-2;-FOR .... SITE ADDRESS: 3775 BUCK OWENS BLVD(PIERCE RD, BAKERSFIELD The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) is able to issue, pursuant to applicable regulations, the enclosed Letter of Commitment (LOC) in an mount not to exceed $45,000. This LOC is' based upon our review of the corrective action costs you reported to have incurred to date. The LOC may be modified by the State Board. It is very important that you read the terms and conditions listed in the enclosed LOC. Claims' filed with the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund far exceed the funding available and it is very important that you make use of the funding that has been committed to your cleanup in a. timely manner. You are reminded that you must comply with all regulatory agency time schedules and requirements and you must obtain three bids for any required corrective action. Only corrective action cOsts required by the regulatory agency to protect human health, safety and the environment can be claimed for reimbursement. You are encouraged to obtain preapproval of costs for all future corrective action work (form enclosed). If you have any questions on obtaining preapproval of your costs or the three bid requirement, please call Mark Owens, our Technical Reviewer assigned to claims in your Region, at (916) 341-5796. Failure to obtain Preapproval of your future costs may result in the costs not being reimbursed. The following documents needed to submit your reimbursement request are enclosed: "Reimbursement Request Instructions[' package. Retain this package for future reimbursement requests. These instructions must be followed when seeking reimbursement for corrective action costs incurred after January 1, 1988. Included in the instruction package are samples of completed reimbursement request forms and spreadsheets. "Bid Summary Sheet" to list information on bids received which must be completed and returned. : "Reimbursement Request" forms which you must use to request reimbursement of costs incurred. California En vironmental Protection Agency ~ RecycledPaper Charles Jimerson -2- "Spreadsheet" forms which you must use in conjunction with your reimbursement request. "Notice of Change of Address" form if needed. n,- THIS IS IMPORTANT TO YOU, PLEASE NOTE: You have 90 calendar days from the date of this letter to submit your first reimbursement request for incurred corrective action costs. NO EXTENSIONS CAN BE GRANTED. If you fail to do so, your LOC funds will automatically be reduced to zero (deobligated). Once this occurs, any future funds for this site are subject to availability when you submit your first reimbursement request:-'vVe continuously review-the-status-o f al-l-acfive-claimsr--¥ou-must-eontinue-to-remain-in compliance and submit a reimbursement request every 6 months. Failure to do so will result in the Fund taking steps to withdraw your LOC. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed documents, please contact Anna Torres at (916) 341-5784. Allan V. eatton,/~anager /~ 'X Underground St~tge Tank Ol~anup Fund Enclosures Lustis Case #: 5T15000865 cc: Mr. John'Noonan Mr. Howard Wines RWQCB, Reg. 5 - Fresno ~" City of Bakersfield Fire Dept. 3614 E. Ashlan Ave. ~' 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Fresno, CA 93726 Bakersfield, CA 93301 CabTornia Environmental P. rotecO'on Agency ~ RecycledPaper Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox , Gray Davis Secretary./hr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 14 December 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 - UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Holden Truck Stop Work Plan Addendum (Addendum) dated 27 November 2001 and Holden Truck Stop Site Characterization Report, Groundwater Monitoring Report//2 (Monitoring Report) dated 30 November 2001. The Addendum and Monitoring Report were prepared by A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The Addendum proposes additional investigation of the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil at the former underground storage tank (UST) cluster in the- northern portion of the site and the former diesel UST in the southern portion of the site. The Monitoring .Report summarizes the results of the second quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 18 October 2001. We requested that you submit a work plan addendum for the additional soil and groundwater investigations by our letter dated 30 November 2001. Our letter also conditionally approved the proposed investigation at the former diesel UST. We requested quarterly groundwater monitoring by our letter dated 16 May 2001. We conditionally approve the investigations proposed in the Addendum. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Summaries of the Addendum, the Monitoring Report, and our comments follow. Summary of the Addendum AJE proposes to drill and sample a boring to within 2 feet of groundwater 20 feet southwest of previous boring S-1. The proposed boring will determine the lateral extent of impacted soils west-southwest of the former gasoline and diesel UST cluster in the northern portion of the site. Samples will be collected at 2-foot intervals to more accurately characterize the soil plume. Boring S-11 will be drilled near the south end of the former diesel UST in the southern portion of the site. Soil samples will be collected at 2-foot intervals in S~i 1 beginning at 18 feet below ground surface (bgs). Sampling will be terminated 2 feet above groundwater (approximately 28 feet bgs). If impacted soils extend vertically to groundwater, a water sample will be collected from the boring. Borings S-12, S-13, and S-14 will be completed in lateral positions south, west, and north of S-11, respectively. These lateral borings will be sampled at 2-foot intervals from 4 feet bgs to within 2 feet of groundwater. Boring S-13 will be drilled 20 feet west of S-11. If impacted soils are not encountered, S-13 will be California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 2 14 December 2001 completed as monitoring well GW-4. If impacted soils are encountered, an additional boring, S-15, will be drilled 10 feet further west and completed as GW-4. The borings will be filled with cement to the surface.. Selected soil samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel and gasoline (TPH-d and TPH-g) by EPA Method 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8020, and lead scavengers and fuel oxygenates by EPA Method 8260B. Groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020, lead scavengers and ~uel oxygenates by EPA Method 8260B, semivolatile compounds by EPA Method 8270, and general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Summary of the Monitoring Report The second groundwater monitoring event was conducted by AJE on 18 October 2001. Depth to groundwater ranged from 26.08 to 28.73 feet below the top of the casings. The average elevation of the water table rose approximately 1.76 feet since the last quarterly monitoring event. AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be toward the southwest and the gradient to be 33.2 feet per mile (0.006 .feet per foot). Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015 and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8260. The samples were not analyzed for the full range of volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260 due to an accident at the laboratory. Due to breakage of sample containers by the laboratory, the monitoring wells were resampled on 29 October 2001 and analyzed for TPH-d. The sample collected from GW-1, the only sample with detected TPH-d, was also analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. TPH-g was not detected during this and the previous groundwater monitoring event. TPH-d was detected in the sample collected from monitoring well GW-1 at 1,300 micrograms per liter (gg/L). TPH-d was detected in GW-1 at 2,500 gg/L during the last monitoring event. BTEX and MTBE were not detected. Toluene was detected in the sample collected from GW-1 during the last monitoring event. Phenanthrene and bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were detected by EPA Method 8270 at 2.5 and 7.4 P'g ./L, respectively. Comments to the Addendum and Monitoring Report Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: We conditionally approve the proposed investigation of the vertical and lateral extent of impacted soils and groundwater at the northern UST cluster and the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST. We do not require that your consultant collect samples at 2-foot depth intervals; 4- or 5-foot intervals should be sufficient. However, a 2-foot sampling interval may be useful to determine moisture conditions as the water table is approached. The full vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbons should be determined. Soil sampling should continue beneath the water table, if necessary. Please submit a report of findings for the investigation by 31 January 2002. U:\UGTUDW_filesk2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CaseskHoldenTruck Addend 12-01 ,doc .ut.-. 4VS'~5'~harles H. Jimerson 3 14 December 2001 We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. We request that groundwater samples collected during the next quarterly monitoring event be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M. The samples should also be analyzed for BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260 and volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260. Samples with detectable TPH-d should also be analyzed for base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen should be included again next quarter. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytidal and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504 John D. Whiting Associate Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Mr. Howard Wines 1II, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure-'~ Ms. Judi Nash, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield, w/enclosure Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosure U:\UGq[MDW_files\2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck Addend 12-0 l.doc Environmental, Inc. 4800 Easton Drive, Suite 101, Bakersfield, CA 93309 Bus: (661) 327-7429 Fax: (661) 327-1707 November 27, 2001 Mr. John D. Whiting California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, CA 93726 Re: Holden Truck Stop Work Plan Addendum 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California 93308 Dear Mr. Whiting: A J Environmental, Inc. is pleased to present this Work Plan Addendum as requested in your letter of November 14, 2001. It addresses the determination of the lateral extent of impacted soils to the west-southwest of Plume//1 and the investigation of the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST located at Holden Truck Stop. Please contact me if you should have any questions or require additional information. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, A J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Michael A. Feldman, R.E.A. President Cc John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank Cc Chris Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Cooper, Rosenlieb & Kimball, LLP ,,'Cc Steve Underwood, Bakersfield Fire Department 4800 Easto , Suite 101, Bakersfield, CA 93309 A JEnvironmental. Inc. Fax:(661)327-1707 Holden Truck Stop Work Plan Addendum 1. Plume #1 A borehole will be drilled 20 feet southwest of previously drilled borehole # S-1 to within 2 feet of groundwater. This borehole will serve to determine the lateral extent of impacted soils to the west-southwest. Samples will be collected at two-foot intervals since it is felt that a more accurate determination of plume geometry can be obtained. 2, ,'12~000 Gallon Diesel UST Borehole S-11 will be drilled at the south end of the former 12,000-gallon diesel tank. Samples will be taken at two-foot intervals starting at 18 feet to within 2 feet of groundwater that is estimated to be 28 feet below ground level. If contamination persists to that depth, a groundwater sample will be taken and the hole will be abandoned by plugging it with cement to the surface. Borehole S-12 will be drilled ten feet south of Borehole S-11. Samples will be taken at two-foot intervals starting at 4 feet to within 2 feet of groundwater. The hole will be abandoned by plugging it with cement to the surface. Borehole S-13 will be drilled twenty feet west of Borehole S-11. Samples will be taken at two-foot intervals starting at 4 feet to within 2 feet of groundwater. If this boring is clean then it will be completed as Groundwater Monitoring Well GW-4. If field observations determine that this boring is contaminated it will be abandoned by plugging it with cement to the surface. An additional hole, (S-15) will be drilled 10 feet further west and if found to be clean will be completed as Groundwater Monitoring Well GW-4. Borehole S-14 will be drilled ten feet north of the former tank. Samples will be taken at two-foot intervals starting at 4 feet to within 2 feet of groundwater. The hole will be abandoned by plugging it with cement to the surface. Selected soil samples from all of the boreholes will be analyzed for: TPH-diesel and TPH-gas by EPA Method 8015M BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020 Lead scavengers and fuel oxygenates by EPA Method 8260B Groundwater samples will be analyzed for: EPA Method 8015M TPH-Diesel, TPH-Gasoline, by BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020 Lead scavengers and fuel oxygenates by EPA Method 8260B Semi volatile compounds by EPA Method 8270 General minerals, nitrate and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) Gulf Street I S-10~ I I Tank lO,OOO gall I I ~ gasolble I GW-le ~ I Tank 12,000 gal ~ 4 I I-- Tank12,000 gall ----II- ,, ,,-, I Proposed ---'~O "~ Boring oS.$ I Office J Building I os-9 I O ~' O .~ e S-8 Repair o S-4 Shop o 3U21 od. U Tire °S-6 S-140 I .... S h o p 0 I Tire I L St°rage.-I S-130 S-ll I O S-12 I Getty Curb Street I LEGEND I I Underground Tank SEC 23 T29S R27E Present Dispenser KERN COUNTY, CA !=1 Drive, #101 Bakersfield, CA 93309 -EI 327-7429 FaD(/661/327-1707 Former Dispenser SCALE: = SO' AJ woo SAN JOAQUIN BANK Existing Soil Boring SITE CONTAMINATION WORKPLAN HOLDEN TRUCK STOP Groundwater Test Well BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SITE MAP Proposed Boring EXHIBIT 1 I DATE: NOVEMBER 2001 Traffic & Cover ~ ~g Well Cap Concrete -~, Slope Pavement Pavement Native Soil Cement Grout 2" Diam. Blank PVC Casing Bentonite Seal 8' 10' 8.5" Diam. Hole #3 Monterey Sand ), 2" Diam. 0.020" PVC SlottedScreen 50' iAj E i ~00 Easton Dr've, #~0~ Bakers'ield, CA 93309 ~ (661) 327-7429 Fax (661) 327-1707 SAN JOAQUIN BANK SITE CONTAMINATION WORKPLAN HOLDEN TRUCK STOP BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION EXHIBIT 2 ~ DATE: NOVEMBER 2001 State W ater Resources Contro Board Division of Clean Water Programs 1001 ~ Street · Sacramento, Cali£ornJa 95814 Winston H. Hickox P.O. Box 944212 · Sacramento, California · 94244-2120 Secretary for (916) 341-5719 , FAX (916) 341-5806 * www.swrcb.ca.gov/cwphome/ustcf Gray Davis Environmental Governor Protection The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website at www. swrcb, ca.gov. November 21,2001 Charles Jimerson Christopher P. Burger 5201 Piute Ave W Glendale, AZ 85308 UNDERGROU]N'D STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND (FUND), NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION: CLAIM NUMBER 016612; FOR SITE ADDRESS: 3775 BUCK OWENS BLVD(PIERCE RD, BAKERSFIELD Your claim has been accepted for placement on the Priority List in Priority Class "B" with a deductible of $5,000. We have completed our initial review. The next step in the claim review process is to conduct a compliance review. Compliance Review: Staff reviews, verifies, and processes claims based on the priority and rank within a priority'class. After the Board adopts the Priority List, your claim will remain on the Priority List until your Priority Class and rank are reached. At that time, staff will conduct an extensive Compliance Review at the local regulatory agency or Regional Water Quality Control Board. During this Compliance Review, staff may request additional information needed to verify eligibility. Once the Compliance Review is completed, staffwill determine if the claim is valid or must be rejected. If the claim is valid, a Letter of Commitment will be issued obligating funds toward the cleanup. If staff determine that you have not complied with regulations governing site cleanup, you have not supplied necessary information or documentation, or your claim application contains a material error, the claim will be rejected. In such event, you will be issued a Notice of Intended Removal from the Priority List, informed of the basis for the proposed removal of your claim, and provided an opportunity to correct the condition that is the basis for the proposed removal. Your claim will be barred from further participation in the Fund, if the claim application contains a material error resulting from fraud or intentional or negligent misrepresentation. Record keeping: During your cleanup project you should keep complete and well organized records of all corrective action activity and payment transactions. If you are eventually issued a Letter of Commitment, you will be required to submit: (1) copies of detailed invoices for all corrective action activity performed (including subcontractor invoices), (2) copies of canceled checks used to pay for work shown on the invoices, (3) copies of technical documents (bids, narrative work description, reports), and (4) evidence that the claimant paid for the work performed (not paid by another party). These documents are necessary for reimbursement and failure to submit them could impact the amount of reimbursement made by the Fund. It is not necessary to submit these documents at this time; however, they will definitely be requiredprior to reimbursement. Compliance with Corrective Action Requirements: In order to be reimbursed for your eligible costs of cleanup incurred after December 2, 1991, you must have complied with corrective action requirements of Article 11, Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regulations. Article 11 categorized the California En vironmental Protection Agency ~ RecycledPaper Charles Jimerson -2- corrective action process into phases. In addition, Article 11 requires the responsible party to submit an investigative workplan/Corrective Action Plan (CAP) before performing any work. This phasing process and the workplan/CAP requirements were intended to: 1. help the responsible party undertake the necessary corrective action in a cost-effective, efficient and timely manner; 2. enable the regulatory agency to review and approve the proposed cost-effective corrective action alternative before any corrective action work was performed; and 3. ensure the Fund will only reimburse the most cost-effective corrective action alternative required by the regulatory agency to achieve the minimum cleanup necessary to protect human health, safety and the environment. In some limited situations interim cleanup will be necessary to mitigate a demonstrated immediate hazard to public health, or the environment. Program regulations allow the responsible party to undertake interim remedial action after: (1) notifying the regulatory agency of the proposed action, and; (2) complying with any requirements that the regulatory agency may set. Interim remedial action should only be proposed when necessary to mitigate an immediate demonstrated hazard. Implementing interim remedial action does not eliminate the requirement for a CAP and an evaluation of the most cost- effective corrective action alternative. Three bids and Cost Preapproval: Only corrective action costs required by the regulatory agency to protect human health, safety and the environment can be claimed for reimbursement. You must comply with all regulatory agency time schedules and requirements and you must obtain three bids for any required corrective action. Unless waived in writing, you are required to obtain preapproval of costs for all future corrective action work. If you do not obtain three bids or a waiver of the three bid requirement, reimbursement is not assured and costs may be rejected as ineligible. If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 341-5719. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Judi Nash Claims Review Unit Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund / cc: Mr. John Noonan Mr. Howard Wines RWQCB, Reg. 5 - Fresno City of Bakersfield Fire Dept. 3614 E. Ashlan Ave. 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Fresno, CA 93726 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Cah'fornia EnvironmentalProtection Agency ~b ~ Recycled Paper AJEnvirnnrn~nf~l In~ 4800 Easton Drive. Suite101. Bakersfield. CA93309 . .--.----.....---..,,,.,.., ...-~. Bus: (661) 327-7429 Fax: (661) 327-1707 November 2, 2001 Mr. John D. Whiting California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, CA 93726 Re: Holden Truck Stop Site Characterization Report 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California 93308 Dear Mr. Whiting: A J Environmental, Inc. is pleased to present this Addendum to the Site Characterization Report submitted on October 12, 2001 for work performed at the Holden Truck Stop: Please contact me if you should have any questions or require additional information. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, A J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Michael A. Feldman, R.E.A. President Cc John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank Cc Chris Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Cooper, Rosenlieb & Kimball, LLP ,/Cc Steve Underwood, Bakersfield Fire Department AJ E 4800 Easton Drive, Suite 101, Bakersfield, CA 93309 m nvironmental, Inc. B.s: (661) 327-7429 Fax: (661) 327-1707 i Addendum #1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction and Development I 1. An 8.5-inch hole was drilled to 50 feet. I 2. Forty feet of 2-inch diameter PVC casing (capped on bottom) with 0.020 slots covered with a fine mesh cotton sock and ten feet of blank 2-inch diameter PVC casing was run. I 3. The slotted casing was surrounded by a #3 Monterey sand pack from fifty feet to eight feet. I 4. A bentonite seal was placed from eight feet to four feet. I 5. Cement grout was installed from four feet to the surface. 6. A locking well cap was placed on top of the casing and a traffic box and cover I was installed around the well head. 7. Each well was developed three weeks after installation of the grout by I swabbing the well using a stainless steel bailer. Four to five casing volumes were swabbed prior to sampling after the temperature, conductivity, and pH had stabilized. I 8. Water levels were measured using an electric tape. ! O California ReglonalcentralWatervalleyQUahtYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca, gov/~rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 14 November 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 _ UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted San Joaquin Bank Site Characterization Report (Report), and San Joaquin Bank Groundwater Monitoring Report//1 (Monitoring Report), dated 12 October 2001, and San Joaquin Bank Diesel Tank Removal (Tank Removal Report) dated 12 September 2001. The reports were prepared by A J Environmental, Bakersfield (AJE). The report describes the investigation of subsurface soils and groundwater monitoring well installations conducted on 25-29 June 2001. The Monitoring Report describes the initial groundwater monitoring event conducted on 18 July 2001. The Tank Removal Report pr&sents the results of soil sampling conducted during removal of one diesel underground storage tank on 18 July 2001. We request that you conduct additional investigation of impacted soils in the northern portion of the site. We also conditionally approve the proposed investigation of soil and groundwater at the 12,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank in the southwestern portion of the site. We request that a work plan addendum be submitted for these investigations. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue. Summaries of the project, the reports, and our comments follow. Prqject Summary The CBFD provided copies of three reports-San Joaquin Bank Phase II Assessment (assessment report) dated March 1998, San Joaquin Bank Tank Removal dated December 2000, and the work plan. The reports were prepared by AJE. The CBFD also provided an Underground Storage Tank Unauthorized Release (Leak) Report, a list of current fee titleholders for the property, and other records pertaining to the underground storage tanks (USTs). The site was developed as a track stop in the late 1940s. The site is approximately .3,000 fee~ west of the Kern River, approximately 2,700 feet southwest of a Kern County Water Authority recharge pond, and approximately 1,200 feet southwest of the Calloway Canal. One 8,000-gallon diesel UST, one 10,000-gallon diesel UST; two 8,000-gall0n gasoline USTs, and associated dispensers and piping were removed from the site in 1985. The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) closed these USTs without further corrective action. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected beneath the former USTs during the removals. Concentrations up to 7,835 parts per million (Ppm) were detected. Concentrations greater than 1,000 California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper · : Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 2 14 November 2001 ppm were detected in four of the eight samples. Benzene was detected in one sample at 1.6 ppm. Documents in the KCEHSD case file indicate that soils from the UST removal excavations were to be disposed of offsite as asphaltic batch material or buried onsite into a subsurface containment area lined with a high-density polyethylene liner and encapsulated with baserock covered by asphalt. Both proposals were approved by the KCEHSD, but no other records indicating soil excavation or disposal are present in the case files. Following the UST removals, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, two 12,000-gallon diesel USTs, and associated dispensers and piping were installed. The USTs installed in 1985 were taken out of service prior to 1998. The CBFD learned of the existence of unpermitted nonoperating USTs at the site and required UST system upgrades or removals in a letter dated 12 October 1998. The USTs were removed on 30 October 2000. One 3,000-gallon waste oil UST was removed on 4 December 2000. A magnetic geophysical survey located the waste oil UST and detected an anomaly that could have been caused by a UST. The presence of a 12,000-gallon diesel UST in the southern portion of the site was mentioned in site records; however, exploration using a hand auger and backhoe failed to discover the UST. Soil samples were collected from the diesel, gasoline, and waste oil UST excavations, dispensers, and piping by AJE on behalf of the San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) was detected in samples collected beneath the middle and west ends of the south diesel tank (Tank #1), the west and east ends and middle of the north diesel UST (Tank #2), the three diesel dispensers, and the waste oil UST. TPH as heavy oil was also detected in the sample collected from the waste oil UST. TPH-d concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg were detected beneath the middle and west end of Tank #1 and the west end of Tank #2. TPH-d concentrations less than 100 mg/kg were detected in samples collected from beneath the diesel dispensers. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) were generally not detected in samples collected from beneath the diesel USTs, piping, and dispensers. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and BTEX was not detected in samples collected from beneath the gasoline USTs, piping, and dispensers. MTBE was detected in two samples at concentrations less than 0.1 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). AJE recommended that no further action be taken at the UST site, based on the removal of the release source(s), paving of the UST excavation area, and the assumed natural attenuation of hydrocarbons in site soils. In a letter dated 24 January 2001, the CBFD stated that the analytical results of the UST removal samples demonstrated "soil contamination above action levels" beneath the two diesel USTs, and required that further assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soils be conducted. In a letter dated 26 January 2001, the KCEHSD required the removal of the 12,000-gallon diesel UST reportedly still onsite. AJE submitted the work plan for site assessment dated 27 February 2001 on behalf of San Joaquin Bank. The CBFD referred the case to the Regional Board by a letter dated 5 March 2001 based on a reference in the work plan. AJE indicated in the work plan that site assessment work conducted (by AJE) in February 1998 found soil and groundwater impacted by gasoline and diesel. Due to client confidentiality, AJE did not submit a copy of the site assessment report of findings to CBFD upon completion of the work. AJE drilled and sampled twenty-nine borings in the vicinity of the former USTs, dispensers, and piping during the February 1998 site assessment. Gasoline and diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were not U:\UGTUDW_files\2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 10-01.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 14 November 2001 detected by field screening and limited laboratory analysis of soil samples from the area of the old USTs (former USTs removed in 1985). TPH-d concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg were detected in samples collected beneath the west dispenser removed in 1985 (old west dispenser). TPH-d and TPH-g was detected beneath the former USTs and dispensers removed on 30 October 2000. TPH-d was detected at concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg beneath the former diesel USTs and the former right middle diesel dispenser. TPH-g was detected in concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg beneath the former USTs, former right middle dispenser, old west dispenser and between the two east dispensers. Benzene was not detected in the soil samples collected during the site assessment. One groundwater sample was collected from boring 29, which was placed between the two eastern dispensers. Benzene, TPH-d and TPH-g were detected at 8 micrograms per liter (gg/L), 60 gg/L, and 17 gg/L, respectively. Summary of the Report AJE drilled and sampled eight soil borings and installed three groundwater monitoring wells on-site on 25-29 June 2001. Three hydrocarbon plumes were identified in subsurface soils. Plume #1 includes the southwest portion of the UST cluster in the northern portion of the site, near the west ends of the former 12,000-gallon diesel USTs. Plume #2 underlies the northeastern portion of the existing dispenser islands'. Plume #3 underlies the former western dispenser island. Based on the analysis of soil samples collected from within the plumes, subsurface soils have been impacted by releases of diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons. Benzene and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), ethyl 'tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME) and dis-isopropyl ether (DIPE) were not detected. Plume #1 is approximately 40 feet in diameter in plan view. Impacted soils extend to groundwater at a depth of 28 feet below ground surface (bgs). The calculated volume of impacted soils is 1,303 cubic yards. TPH-d concentrations ranging from 5,000 to 22,000 mg/kg were detected in soil samples collected from within the plume. Impacted soils were encountered in monitoring well boring GW-1 to groundwater. A TPH-d concentration of 55,000 ~tg/L was detected in a groundwater sample collected from boring S-1. Plume #2 is approximately 25 feet in diameter in plan view and has a vertical extent of approximately 20 feet bgs. The calculated volume of impacted soils is 364 cubic yards. A maximum TPH-d concentration of 1,900 mg/kg was detected within Plume #2 during this investigation. Plume #3 is approximately 10 feet in diameter in plan view and has a vertical extent of less than 15 feet bgs. The calculated volume of impacted soils is 38 cubic yards (assuming a depth of 13 feet). A TPH-d concentration of 1,900 mg/kg was detected in one soil sample. Soils encountered during the investigation were primarily fine- to coarse-grained sand, gravel with a coarse sand matrix, with minor clayey sand and sandy clay. AJE concludes that the site "presents little danger to the unconfined ground water aquifer." AJE indicates that the upper unconfined aquifer is not utilized for domestic use in the vicinity of the site. AJE recommends that groundwater monitoring continue for one year. U:\UGT~JDW_filesL2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 10-01.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 4 - 14 November 2001 Summary of the Monitoring Report AJE installed three 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring'wells screened with 0.020-inch slotted casing from 10 to 50 feet bgs. The initial groundwater monitoring event was conducted by AJE on 18 July 2001. Depth to groundwater ranged from 28.01 to 30.30 feet below the top of the casing. AJE calculated the direction of shallow groundwater flow to be west-southwest and the gradient to be 28 feet per mile (0.005 feet per foot). The samples were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015, BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020, volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260, base neutral and acid extractable organic compounds by EPA Method 8270, and general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. TPH-g was not detected. TPH-d was detected in the sample collected from monitoring well GW- 1 at 2,500 micrograms per liter (gg/L). Toluene was detected in GW-1 at 0.64 gg/L. Napthalene was detected in GW-1 at 2.9 gg/L. Electrical conductivity ranged from 262 to 613 micromhos per centimeter (gmhos/cm). Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 180 to 348 milligrams per liter (mg/L). Bicarbonate and calcium ranged from 114 to 139 mg/L and 21 to 30 mg/L, respectively. Nitrate was detected at concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 mg/L. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen was detected in two of the three samples at 2 mg/L. Summary of the Tank Removal Report One 12,000 gallon capacity diesel UST was removed from the southeast portion of the site on 18 July 2001. The UST was south of the easternmost fuel dispenser islands and north of Getty Street. AJE collected soil samples at depths of 2 and 6 feet below the bottom of the UST under the supervision of the CBFD. Samples were collected from beneath the center, and north and south ends of the UST. Soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory for TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020. TPH-d was detected at 690 and 190 mg/kg at 2 feet and 6 feet, respectively beneath the north end of the UST and at 25 mg/kg at 6 feet beneath the middle of the UST. TPH-d concentrations of 2,100 and 9,300 mg/kg, respectively were detected beneath the south end of the UST. The maximum known depth of impacted soils is 18 feet bgs. AJE recommends that impacted soils beneath the south end of the UST be characterized. AJE recommends that four borings (S-11 through S-14) be drilled and sampled to groundwater (approximately 28 to 30 feet bgs) to determine the vertical and lateral extent of impacted soils. Boring S-11 would be drilled near the south end of the former UST and would be sampled from 18 feet bgs to groundwater at 2-foot intervals to determine the depth of impacted soils. If impacted soils extend to groundwater, a groundwater sample would be collected from S-11 and S-13 would be completed as a groundwater monitoring well. Borings S-12, S-13, and S-14 are proposed as lateral borings 10 to 20 feet south, west, and north of S-11, respectively. Soil samples would be collected from S-12 through S-14 at 2-foot intervals beginning at 4 feet bgs and continuing to 2 feet above groundwater. If S-13 is completed as a groundwater monitoring well, the monitoring well would be installed to a depth of 50 feet bgs. Laboratory analysis will be consistent with analytes requested by our letter dated 16 May 2001. U:\UGTUDW_filesX2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 10-01.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5 14 November 2001 Comments To The Reporh Monitorin~ Report~ and Tank Removal Report Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: Site investigation has identified three plumes of soil impacted by diesel range petroleum constituents. Plume #1, appears to have the greatest diameter and extends vertically to groundwater. Groundwater flow during the initial monitoring event was toward the west-southwest. A diesel concentration of 2,500 gg/L was detected in a groundwater sample collected from monitoring well GW-1, within the impacted soils and west of the former USTs, during the initial monitorin~ event. The presence of TPH-d concentrations ranging from 4,000 to 22,000 mg/kg in soil samples collected from boring GW-1 indicates that Plume #1 may extend an unknown distance to the west due to hydrocarbon migration downgradient. We request that the lateral extent of impacted soils west to west-southwest of Plume #1 be determined by drilling and sampling one additional lateral boring. We conditionally approve the proposed investigation of the vertical and lateral extent of impacted soils at the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST. We do not require that your consultant collect samples at depth intervals; 4- or 5-foot intervals should be sufficient. However, a 2-foot sampling interval may be useful to determine moisture conditions as the water table is approached. If a monitoring well is to be installed in S-13, and impacted soils are encountered, we request that the monitoring well be relocated west of the impacted soils. Soil samples should be collected from S-13. Please submit a brief work plan addendum in letter format proposing the additional investigation of Plume#1 and the investigation at the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST by 17 December 2001. A scaled site .plan and schematic diagram of the proposed monitoring well should be included. Soil samples should be analyzed for TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and BTEX by EPA 8020. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should be continued at the site. Groundwater samples collected during the next monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. ~ting~' Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 cc: Mr. Howard Wines 111, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfiel'l~ Ms. Judi Nash, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield U:\UGTxJDW_filesL2000-2001Cotxespondence\CityofBakersfield Cases\HoldenTmck 10-01.doc D October 31,2001 mE C.~E~ Mr. John Whiting, R.G. RON FRAZE Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 4614 East Ashlan Ave 2101 "H" Street Fresno Ca 93726 Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 RE: Former Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck Owens Blvd SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Dear Mr. Whiting: Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 This letter is to inform you that this Office has also received the Diesel PREVENTION SERVICES Tank Removal report, dated September, 2001, submitted by AJ 1715 Chester Ave. Environmental on behalf of San Joaquin Bank. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 This Office now considers all underground storage tanks of record to have ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES been properly removed from the site. As indicated in our March 5, 2001 1715 ChestorAve. letter to the responsible party, our Office continues to defer oversight of Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 the soil and groundwater investigation phase to the Board. However, we FAX (661) 32643576 are always available at the local level to assist you in any way we can. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 933O6 o]ncere]y, VOICE (661)399'4697 FAX (661)399-5763 Howard II. Wines, III IIazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm cc: C. Jimerson J. Ivy, San Joaquin Bank C. Burger, Klein et al M. Feldman, AJ Environmental KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP Anthony J. Klein LAWYERS Jennifer A. Adams Thomas V. DeNatale, Jr. Abigale M. Auffant Barry L. Goldner 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE Catherine E. Bennett J. L. Rosenlieb SECOND FLOOR Dawn Bittleston David J. Cooper BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Craig D. Braun Claude P. Kimball Scott A. Galland William A. Bruce MAILING ADDRESS: Kelly A. Griffin-Lazerson Ned E. Dunphy P.O. BOX 11172 Jeffrey W. Noe Leonard K. Welsh BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-1172 Nancy L. Oehler Suellen H. Anderson (661) 395-1000 Timothy G. Scanlon T. Scott Belden FAX (661) 326-0418 Jean M. Stroud Christopher P. Burger E-MAIL kleinlaw~kleinlaw.com Mci Ehrlich Thomas C. Fallgatter Kevin C. Findley Kenneth A. Holland OF COUNSEL Krystyna L. Jamieson Bruce F. Bunker TO: Mr. Howard Wines, III Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: Claim No. 16612 DATE: October 23, 2001 Please find enclosed: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY For Underground Storage Tanks Containing Petroleum For your use and information.  Pursuant to request. your I I Pursuant to our teler~hone conference.  For review and comments. your Please where indicated in BLUE INK and return to our office. sign Sincerely ~ Secretary to Christopher P. Burger Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 (Instructions on reverse side) CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONTAINING PETROLEUM A. I am required to demonstrate Financial Responsibility in the Required amounts as specified in Section 2807, Chapter 18, Div. 3, Title 23, CCR: F-'~ 500,0(O dollars per occurrence ~ I million dollars annual aggregate or AND or E~ I million dollars per occurrence L._J 2 million dollars annual aggregate B. Char les J imer son hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Section 2807, (Name of Tank Owner or Operator) Article 3, Chapter 18, Division 3, Title 23, California Code of Regulations. The mechanisms used to demonstrate financial responsibility as required by Section 2807 are as follows: .... . ... : ::.. .:: ~!::::i!P~:fl6i~:?i:!~ ~fiii?A~t[6~?iiii!iiii!~fliii~;::i~ii?!~ STATE STATE UST CLEANUP N/A 5995,000 pe: STATE YES YES UST FUND FUND Dccurence UST P. O. BOX 944212 and Annual CLEANUP SACRAMENTO, CA .~ggregate CONTINUO JS 94244-2420 GUARANTY SAN JOAQUIN BANK N/A 55,000 per Continuo is YES YES 4600 California A, re. Dccurence Bakersfield, CA and Annual 93309 .~ggregate Note: If you are using the State Fund as any part of your demonstration of financial responsibility, your execution and submission of this certification also certifies that you are in compliance with all conditions for participation in the Fund. D. Facility Name Facility Address . 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Facility Name Facility Address OFFICIAL$ Facility Name ~t ~ ~6~k~? ~u~'dd.ik]~'6i~ Facility Address I I ~-~IP~ MARICOPA COUNTY E. Sign~ofT~[~,~v/r~Operator ~.~. Date Nameand Title of Tank Owner or Operator I/? CHARLES JIMERSON .~n[~e of Witne'Xss ouf~otary ~ ~_ ~_ ') Date Name of Witness or Notary' CFR ( ,ed 04/~$) ~II.E: Original - Lo¢~,I ~§~n¢~ (opie~ - Fa~ility/$il~(.~) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT CE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 171 5 CHESTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 O California ReglonalcentralWatervalleyQUahtYRegion ntrol Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis SecretaryJbr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Interact Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 16 May 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5201 West Piute Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY In a letter dated 5 March 2001, the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) referred the subject case to our agency for regulatory oversight. It also provided us with information that indicates diesel fuel and gasoline leaked at the subject facility and degraded soil and groundwater. It will be necessary for you to determine the extent of impacted soils and groundwater caused by the leak. We conditionally approve the work proposed by your consultant AJ Environmental (AJE) in the Holden Truck Stop Work, Health and Safety Plan (work plan) dated 27 February 2001. Summaries of the project, the work plan, and our comments follow. Project Summary The CBFD provided copies of three reports-San Joaquin Bank Phase HAssessment (assessment report) dated March 1998, San Joaquin Bank Tang: Removal dated December 2000, and the work plan. The reports were prepared by AJE. The CBFD also provided an Underground Storage Tank Unauthorized Release (Leak) Report, a list of current fee titleholders for the property, and other records pertaining to the underground storage tanks (USTs). Based on discussions with Mr. John Ivy, Senior Vice President, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield, and documents provided by the CBFD, Board staff understands that you currently hold title to the property and that the site is managed by San Joaquin Bank. We also understand that Mr. Christopher Burger of the law firm Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, et. al., Bakersfield, has submitted a Claim Application and supporting documentation for the site to the UST Cleanup Fund. The site was developed as a truck stop in the late 1940s~ The site is approximately 3,000 feet west of the Kern River, approximately 2,700 feet southwest of a Kern County Water Authority recharge pond, and approximately 1,200 feet southwest of the Calloway Canal. One 8,000-gallon diesel UST, one 10,000-gallon diesel UST, two 8,000-gallon gasoline USTs, and associated dispensers and piping were removed from the site in 1985. The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) closed these USTs without further corrective action. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected beneath the former USTs during the removals. Concentrations up to 7,835 parts per million (ppm) were detected. Concentrations greater than 1,000 ppm were detected in four of the eight samples. Benzene was detected in one sample at 1.6 ppm. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 2 16 May 2001 Documents in the KCEHSD case file indicate that soils from the UST removal excavations were to be disposed of offsite as asphaltic bach material or buried onsite into a subsurface containment area lined with a high-density polyethylene liner and encapsulated with baserock covered by asphalt. Both proposals were approved by the KCEHSD, but no other records indicating soil excavation or disposal are present in the case files. Following the UST removals, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, two 12,000-gallon diesel USTs, and associated dispensers and piping were installed. The USTs installed in 1985 were taken out of service prior to 1998. The CBFD learned of the existence of unpermitted nonoperating USTs at the site and required UST system upgrades or removals in a letter dated 12 October 1998. The USTs were removed on 30 October 2000. One 3,000-gallon waste oil UST was removed on 4 December 2000. A magnetic geophysical survey located the waste oil UST and detected a magnetic anomaly that ~ould have been caused by a UST. The presence of a 12,000-gallon diesel UST in the southern portion of the site was mentioned in site records; however, exploration using a hand auger and backhoe failed to discover the UST. Soil samples were collected from the diesel, gasoline, and waste oil UST excavations, dispensers, and piping by AJE on behalf of the San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) was detected in samples collected beneath the middle and west ends of the south diesel tank (Tank #1), the west and east ends and middle of the north diesel UST (Tank #2), the three diesel dispensers, and the waste oil UST. TPH as heavy oil was also detected in the sample collected from the waste oil UST. TPH-d concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg were detected beneath the middle and west end of Tank #1 and the west end of Tank #2. TPH-d concentrations less than 100 mg/kg were detected in samples collected from beneath the diesel dispensers. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) were generally not detected in samples collected from beneath the diesel USTs, piping, and dispensers. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and BTEX was not detected in samples collected from beneath the gasoline USTs, piping, and dispensers. MTBE was detected in two samples at concentrations less than 0.1 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). AJE recommended that no further action be taken at the UST site, based on the removal of the release source(s), paving of the UST excavation area, and the assumed natural attenuation of hydrocarbons in site soils.. In a letter dated 24 January 2001, the CBFD stated that the analytical results of the UST removal samples demonstrated "soil contamination above action levels" beneath the two diesel USTs, and required that further assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soils be conducted. In a letter dated 26 January 2001, the KCEHSD required the removal of the i2,000-gallon diesel UST reportedly still onsite. AJE submitted the work plan for site assessment dated 27 February 2001 on behalf of San Joaquin Bank. The CBFD referred the case to the Regional Board by a letter dated 5 March 2001 based on a reference in the work plan. AYE indicated in the work plan that site assessment work conducted (by AYE) in February 1998 found soil and groundwater impacted by gasoline and diesel. Due to client confidentiality, AJE did not submit a copy of the site assessment report .of findings to CBFD upon completion of the work. AYE drilled and sampled twenty-nine borings in the vicinity of the former USTs, dispensers, and piping during the February 1998 site assessment. Gasoline and diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected by field screening and limited laboratory analysis of soil samples from the area of the old USTs (former USTs removed in 1985). TPH-d concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg were detected in U :\UGTUDW_files\2000-2001 CmTespondence\City of Bakersfield Cases'd-IoldenTruck 1 st Ltr 5-0 l.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson - 3 - 16 May 2001 samples collected beneath the west dispenser removed in 1985 (old west dispenser). TPHod and TPH-g was detected beneath the former USTs and dispensers removed on 30 October 2000. TPH-d was detected at concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg beneath the former diesel USTs and the former right middle diesel dispenser. TPH-g was detected in concentrations gi:eater than 100 mg/kg beneath the former USTs, former right middle dispenser, old west dispenser and between the two east dispensers.' Benzene was not detected in the soil samples collected during the site assessment. One groundwater sample was collected from boring 29, which was placed between the two eastern dispensers. Benzene, TPH-d and TPH-g were detected at 8 micrograms per liter (gg/L), 60 [tg/L, and 17 ~tg/L, respectively. Work Plan Summary AJE proposes to assess the extent of soil and groundwater impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons by drilling and sampling soil borings and installing and sampling temporary and permanent groundwater monitoring wells. Soil.borings and monitoring wells will be drilled and installed using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with 8.5-inch diameter hollow-stem augers. Soil sampling will be conducted using a 2.5-inch split-spoon sampler fitted with 6-inch long brass sample tubes. The auger head will be cleaned between sampling intervals and borings to minimize cross contamination. Soils encountered will be logged by a geologist registered in the State of California using the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil samples will be screening for volatile organic vapors in the field using a photo ionization detector. Borings encountering contamination will be backfilled with bentonite pellets and cements. Soil cuttings will be temporarily stored onsite in sealed 55-gallon drums. Soil disposal will be determined based on laboratory analysis of soil samples. AJE proposes to drill and sample three soil borings (designated S-1 through S-3) to determine the depth and lateral extent of impacted soils associated with the two former diesel USTs. Boring S-1 will be drilled to determine vertical extent at the location 0f known impacted soils beneath the former south diesel UST, based on the analysis of UST removal samples. Boring S-2 will be drilled northwest of S-l, and S-3.will be drilled southeast of S-1 to determine lateral extent. Soil samples will be collected from S-1 at 2-foot intervals beginning at 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). Borings S-2 and S-3 will be sampled at 5-foot intervals to 15 feet bgs and at 2-foot intervals below 15 feet. Soil sampling will continue until field screening for volatile organic compounds are not detected above background concentrations in two consecutive samples. If impacted soils appear to extend to groundwater, S-1 will be converted into a monitoring well. Soil borings S-4 through S-6 will be drilled to determine the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soils in the area of the old former fuel dispensers. S-4 will be drilled adjacent to the present western dispenser, an area of impacted soil identified by the February 1998 site assessmdnt, to determine the vertical extent of impacted soil. S-5 and S-6 will be drilled to determine the lateral extent of impacted soils. Soil samples will be collected from S-4 through S-6 at 2-foot intervals beginning at 4 feet bgs. If impacted soils are found to extend to groundwater, based on field evidence, the first boring to encounter contamination will be converted into a groundwater monitoring well. A trench will be excavated south of the truck scale area in an effort to discover the reported 12,000- gallon diesel UST. Two soil samples (S-7 and S-8) will be collected at the bottom of the trench if the UST is not discovered: U:\UGTODW_files\2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 1st Ltr 5-01.doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 4 16 May 2001 Selected soil samples collected from borings S-1 through S-3 and S-7 and S-8 will be analyzed for BTEX and MTBE, TPH-g and TPH-d using EPA Methods 8015M/8020. AJE proposes to install two groundwater monitoring wells designated GW-1 and GW-2 in the northwest and northeast corners of the site, respectively. Monitoring well GW-3 will be installed between the tWO easternmost dispenser islands, in the vicinity of the impacted soils and groundwater identified by 1998 site assessment borings 10, 11, and 29. The monitoring wells will be constructed using 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing set in 8.5-inch diameter borings, with a screened interval of 0.020-inch slotted casing extending from 10 to 50 feet bgs, ~'filter pack of #3 sand overlain by a 2- foot seal of hydrated bentonite and cement grout from the bentonite to near the surface. The wells will be finished with locking well caps and traffic boxes. Monitoring wells GW-1 through GW-3 will be used to establish a local groundwater gradient and for soil and groundwater sampling. AJE proposes to install two temporary monitoring wells, designated GW-4 and GW-5, in positions 10 and 20 feet from monitoring well MW-3, respectively. GW-4 and GW-5 will be used to establish a water level, test groundwater chemistry, and determine the lateral extent of impacted groundwater. These wells will be abandoned after sampling. Permanent monitoring wells will be developed at least 24 hours after installation of the grout using the airlift method. A licensed land surveyor will survey the wellheads to an accuracy'of 0.01 foot. Monitoring wells will be sampled quarterly. Each monitoring well will be purged by removing three casing volumes. Groundwater samples will be collected using disposable polyethylene bailers. Groundwater samples will be analyzed for BTEX and MTBE, TPH-g and TPH-d. Work Plan Comments Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: We require that the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soils be further defined. The complete vertical extent of impacted soils should be defined below the water table, if necessary. The extent of impacted soil should be defined in the area of the fOrmer USTs (in the northern portion of the site), in the eastern portion of the dispensers (area of 1998 site assessment boring 29), and in the western portion of the old dispensers (area of 1998 site assessment boring 21). We approve the locations of borings S-1 through S- 6 to determine the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soils. We require that additional soil borings be drilled and sampled north of 1998 site assessment boring 29, east of 1998 site assessment boring 21, and between 1998 site assessment borings 21 and 29 to determine the lateral extent of impacted soils. Soil samples should be analyzed for TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA 8020, and the lead scavengers 1,2-DCA, EDB, and the fuel oxygenates'methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) by EPA Method 8260B. Water level measurements and groundwater samples shall be collected from all monitoring wells quarterly. We do not require the installation of 4-inch diameter monitoring wells. We assume that the work plan mistakenly specified 4-inch diameter casings for the 8.5-inch diameter borings. Typically, 2- inch diameter casing is installed in 8.5-inch diameter borings. One permanent groundwater monitoring well should be installed in the northeast corner of the site as the upgradient well. Another permanent U:\UGTUDW_files\2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 1 st Ltr 5-01 .doc Mr. Charles H. Jimerson 5 16 May 2001 groundwater monitoring well should be installed approximately 20 feet west of the former USTs in the northern portion of the site. A third permanent monitoring well should be installed west of the old dispenser locations near the Convenience Store/Tire Shop building. No other permanent monitoring well installations are necessary at this time. We do not approve the airlift method for well development. Development should be conducted using an alternate method. The industry standard for the development of monitoring wells is to use surge blocks and pumping. Development should proceed until purge water is free of sediment and pH, conductivity and temperature stabilize. " We require all potential chemicals of concern (COCs) in groundwater be identified. The potential COCs are to initially include, TPH-d and TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA 8020, and the full range of compounds detected by EPA Method 8260B, including the lead scavengers 1-2 dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB), and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE, and TBA. We also require that the groundwater sample with the highest detectable concentration of TPH-d be analyzed by EPA Method 8270 for the full range of semivolatile compounds. The sampling plan may propose that future analyses for the COCs be performed by different methods than the initial analyses, or that certain analyses be discontinued once the presence or absence of potential COCs have been confirmed. The initial sampling is to include analytical methods that clearly demonstrate the presence or absence of potential COCso In addition to the COCs, we require that you sample groundwater for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two nonconsecutive quarterly sampling events (minimum of six months between sampling events). We do not require soil sampling in the proposed UST exploration trench in the southern portion of the site unless field evidence of impacted soils is discovered. Provided you follow the above comments, we approve the scope of work proposed in the work plan. Please contact this office at least 72 hours in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. ~hiti~nn'g ~t~ Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 cc: Mr. Howard Wines III, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bak~ Ms. Sandy Gill, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Christopher Burger, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield U:\UGTODW_files\2000-2001 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck 1st Ltr 5-01.doc %RSFIELD FIRE DEPART~ IRONNENTAL SERVICES~' 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM CONTRACTOR ~ ~ q'~/r~&, ' CONTACT PERSON E~I~'~ LABORATORY ~ ~,~. ~,~o%# OF SAMPLES ~ ~ST ~ODOL~GY ~C ~. ~r~ ~ ' PRELI~Y ASSESS~' C~. ~J. CO,ACT PERSON ~ ~t~ ~(~'~, CO~ ~CIEPT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LEL% ~ 0~% 7, PLOT P~ CONDITION OF TANKS CONDITION OF PIPING COMMENTS DATE Z~I~PEcroI;S ~ $ l(~/AllJlIE D April23,2001 Mr. John Whiting, R.G. FIRE CHIEF Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board RON FRAZE 3614 East Ashlan Avenue ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Fresno, CA 93726 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard in Bakersfield VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Dear Mr. Whiting: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Enclosed, please find a photocopy of the case file regarding the underground Bakersfield, CA 93301 storage tanks. There are indications that a 12,000 gallon diesel UST remains illegally VOICE (661) 326-3941 abandoned someplace south of the scale house. FAX (661) 395-1349 I've examined the previous groundwater investigations in the area and the data PREVENTION SERVICES indicate that groundwater flow direction is dependent on proximity of the site to either 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 the unlined canals or the Kern River which encompass the area. The flow direction at VOICE (661) 328-3951 the Beacon Station is nearly due west, however, at the Leo Black and Davies sites the FAX (661) 326-0576 direction was to the southwest. Holden's proximity to those sites should yield a predicted southwesterly groundwater flow direction here as well. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Please review the enclosed materials for the purpose of responding to the VOICE (661) 326-3979 February 27, 2001 workplan submitted by A.J. Environmental, Inc. If you have any FAX (661) 326-0576 questions, please call me at (661) 326-3979. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Sincerely, Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 ~..~~~ FAX (661) 399-5763 ~- _, u-x Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/db Enclosures cc: J. Ivy, San Joaquin Bank (w/o enclosures) M. Feldman, A.J. Environmental (w/o enclosures) s:April2001XJWhlting 3775 Buck Owens Blvd.wpd UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ~ REPORT BEEN FILED ? [-~YES ~NO  REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~OPERATOR ~ REGION~ BOARD COMPANYOR AGENCY NAME ~ ADDRESS C~ STATE ZIP  NAME [ ~NT~TPERSON ~ PHONE ~ ADDRESS ~ CROSS STREET m (1) NAME QUANTI~ LOST (~LLONS) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ UNKNOWN ~ DATE DIS~VERED Y HOWDIS~VERED ~ INVENTORY~NTROL ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ~ NUIS~CE CONDITIONS ~ DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N M~HOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ~L ~AT APPLY) ~ HAS DISCHARGE SEEN STOPPED ? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ CLOSE TANK & FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE PROCEDURE O ~ ~ YES ~ NO IFYES. DA~ "1 MI DI C YI ' ~ REP~CETANK ~ OTHER SOURCE OF DI~HARGE ,CAUSE(S) ~ ~ TANK~AK mUNKNOWN ~ OVERFILL ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ SPILL ~ 0 ~ PIPING L~K ~ OTHER ~ ~RROSION ~ UNKNOWN ~ OTHER ~ ~ CHECKONEONLY ~ UNDE~RMINED ~ SOIL ONLY ~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HA~ AC~ALLY BEEN AFFEC~D) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ ~ ~ NO ACTION TArN ~ PRELIMINARY Sim ASSESSMENT~RKP~N SURMISED ~ POLLUTION CHARACTERI~TION ~ ~ LE~BEING~NFIRMED ~ PRELIMINARYSITEASSE~MENTUNDERWAY ~ POST CLE~UP MONITORING IN PROGRESS ~ REMEDIATION P~N ~ CASE CLOSED(CLE~UP~MPLE~DOR UNNECE~AR~ ~ CLE~UP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION (1~ ~ ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TREATGROUNDWA~R(G~ REP~CE SUPPLY (RS) J~ ~ ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NOACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~ TREA~ENT AT H~P (HU) ~ V~NT ~IL ~S) i~< ~ VACUUM EXTRACT ~E) ~ OTHER (O~ iNSii~UCTiONS i I'~--J!~!{6}T~N{"_-~i{ ~ Leak Bei~}~ ConfLrme~ - Lea!< suspected at si~e. but hen not been confi~ed~ indicate v~hethe~j eme~cge~c? res%5onse person~e~ and equip~en~ were ir~olved Preliminary S~te Assessment Hork~ian Submitted - workpl~n/pr~sal at ar~- time, Jif so~ a F~a~sr%N'},~s Hatek'ial incident Rs~rt should be filed requested of/submitted by responsible party to dege~ine who%her ~rot~d with L'he State Office3 ef Emer~%ehcy Services fOES) at ~800 Meadow/iow Road, water bas been~ or will be, impacted ~s a resu!% of the release. your local, underground storable tank permitting a~ency, indicate whether Po].i.u%ion Characterization - res~Dnsible par~.y is in the process of fully t'he DE;% roi:orb has been filed as of the date of this report, definins th~ extent of contamination in soil ~%d gIo~d water and assassins impacts on surface a~d/er ~ro~nd LOCAZL ~r' '~ .... 0TM ,~ .a,~g~ ~.~ ~.~ Remediation Plan - re~edia~ion plan s~ittsd evatua~i~ lon~ Te ovoid duplicate notifi~a~.ien i~u~,uan~ ~o Health an~ Safety code Sec%ion ~emed. i~hion options. Proposal and i~em~nta~ion schedule for appropriate z.~,~,.~ e devernment, emp'~o.See should sign and date the fo~ in this block, remediabion options also submit%ed. A ~siguature here d~_29.A .!'k~z mee~ that the leak has been '~ ' ' - e~Be~nee to pose a Cleanun Underwa! implementation of remediation s~suifi, cant threat t,o huron{ health or safety only that notification ~Cleanup Mpnitorin~ in Progress - periodic g~ouod ~ater or other of remedial activities. ,Ert~er your name~ L~,iepNo~e ~u~}her, and add.ess, indicate which party you further work i.s necessa~' aL the site, · z~-~.~R~}~NT: THE iNF0~%~Ti0N PROVIDED ON THIS FO~-~ IS iN~ED FOR G~ ~-'-...,_: ~:..~...:~ ~_~:---_.-.u~ ~.;_,~-~.._ :. STATiSTiCAL PURPOSES O}~Y ~$D IS NOT TO BE CONS~L~ EnLer name, Leilephone numbed, r, cenT;act person, and ad~ss of the party OFFICIAL POSITION-OF ~Y ~VE~NT~ 2;espeusLh. ls fo.r b?e ix;ak. ]'he responsihle party would no.ally be the ta~ , owner, ~b~D Ill ACTION indicate which action have been used to c!e~nup or remediats the !e~k. [~iTi~.~{]~ATi____[~{ Descriptions of options follow: Enter i. nformat, ioN r~'''~ ~'~'~" . AB =~e< .... 1. Iz~ ~;~;]e tank facility, e mi~i~, you must provide the facility name and full adfJress. ~ap Si~e - install horizontal impe~eabie layer to.reduce rainfall - infilti'ation. ,~ ~,.:~,:.m}~.~.~ ............... Coutai~ent Barrier - insta1~ vsr~ica~ dike to block horizon%al movement of E~ter r~ames of the it, ca.[ aa,(nc7 and ResiDual Water %~a!ity Control Dosed contam.inant. involved. Ex,ovate and D.is~ose - remove contaminated soil ~d dis~se in approved site. ~i~!~}~CE_~._ih~U'~{. :!1.,::~{~.{~ Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil ~d trea~ -'.includes spreadins ~{~N ,e~; t, he name ~h}d qua~Lity i. ost of the hazardous s~s~ance involved. Room or land farming}. is p~:ovided for i.nferu~atioN e~ two substances if appropriate. If more than Remove Free Preduc~ - remove floatin~ product fr~ water robie. · two substances 'leaked, list the two of most conce~% for cleanup. ' ~ and Treat Groundwater - generally employed to r~ve dissolved cont z~-~in an h s, DL..~.,~, ~.z~A:~ATL-zNF Enhanced Biodegradation - use of any avail~le technology to promote Provide imforma'r, ien rega~xlin~, the discovery and abatement of %he ls~. bacterial decomposition of co~tm~inanhs. Replace Su~ly - provide alternative water supply to affected p~ties. SOURCE/CAUSe6 Treatment at Hookup - install water treatment devices at each dwelling or Indi. cats sourc.e{~} of i~a],~ 'Check box{es) indicating cause of ie~, other D.]ace of use. Vacu~m~ Extract - use p,~ps om blowers to dr~ air throu~ ~oiL_ CASE FfPE Vent Soil - bore holes in soil to ai!ow, volahikiza~ion of cont~nants. indicate ~he case type cate~ouy for 5bis ieee. Check one box only. Case No Action Re. ired - incident is mino~, re~irinE no r~edial action. type is based ~r~ ~he ~no~b sensitive resource affected. For ex--pie, if he%h soil. and sreund watbr have been effected, case t}~e will be "Ground e~{SN!s - Use this space to elaborate .on any aspects of the incident. Water~ . indicate '[}rink~n~ kate's' only if one or ~re ~nicipal or domestic water wells have achuai.]y been affected. A "Ground Water" SIGNATt~E - Sion tile form in the spage provided. ~esignation does net in~piy hNat the affegted wa~er cannot be, or is not. used for dri~iking water h2t eniy %hat water wells have nob yet been DISTRIBUTION affected, llt is understood that case type may ch~n~e upon further if the form is completed by the ta~ o~e~ or his aKent~ regain the lash copy investigation, and forward the remaining copies intact %o your !ocs~ for distribution, Ch~REN'Z STATUS i. O:-i~2i~ai - i,ncal Ta~ Penniht:ing Asency ir~dicate the category wN.fch best describes the curre~It status of the case. 2. Regional Water Quality Control Board Check one box eniy~ Th~ r~sponse shcu.l.d be relative to the case type. For 3. i.ocal Health Officer ~d County Board of Sdpervi~ors or %heir example, if ca~}e typ~s is ~'(~F~l~lld W%~ter::: then ==Current Status'~ should refer , ~eeeive Proposition 65 notifications. ho the sta'bus of t, he ground water investigation or cleanup~ as opposed tO 4. {.%~ner/responsi.b!e party. that of soil, D~script. i. ons of options No Action Taken -. No act.~oN has been taken by ~esponsibl~ party beyc, nd ]'nitial .r(~port c)f ] A JEnvironmental, Inc. 4800 Easton Drive, Suite101, Bakersfield, CA93309 Bus: (661) 327-7429 Fax: (661) 327-1707 February 27, 2001 Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Holden Truck Stop Work, Health and Safety Plan 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California 93308 Dear Mr. Wines: A J Environmental, Inc. is pleased to present this Work, Health, and Safety Plan for Holden Truck Stop located at 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard, Bakersfield, California as requested by the Bakersfield Fire Department. Please contact me if you should have any queStions or require additional information. Sincerely, A J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Michael A. Feldman, R.E.A. President UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ?~OR~OC~GENC~?USEON[~?:~?:?:?:~::~ ~?~?::::?:?::'~ ~ ?:~::~::?.~?,~?:?:~:~?:::::~?.~?:~?:?:::~:~?:~ ::~ ?~:.ii?j :'!::::!ii:.: i: REPORT DA~~ YES O REmRTcAsE,BEEN FILED ? ~ YES ~. NO Y :::b:.:. :::::5: ::::::::::::::::::::: ===============================~...~,-':::::::::: :::::: :' :2::.: :.:::::: :: :: ~::::::::::: :5:: :: :::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: :..: :::::: ::: 2: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : S~N~;::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: ~ ~::::i~:~ ?:~? +: ?:~:~ :::.~ +: (:::~: :::: ~: ~::~:::.f ~:::~:~:' ~:~::? :.:,~: ~:DATE::~:~:N~:::: ~ REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~OPERATOR ~ REGION~BOARD I COMPANY OR AGENCY NAME ~ ADDRESS C~ STATE ZIP :~ NAME { ~NT~T PERSON PHONE ~ ~ ADDRESS ~T~E~ ~ ~TA~ ZIP ~ ADDRESS ~ CROSS STREET O L~AL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NTACT PERSON PHONE ~ REGION~ aOARD PHONE (1) NAME QUANTI~ LOST (GALLONS) DATE DIS~VERED HOW DIS~VERED ~ INVENTORY~NTROL ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ~ NUIS~CE CONDITIONS ~ DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N M~HOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ~L ~AT APPLY) ~ HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ CLOSE TANK & FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE PR~EDURE O * ~ REPUTE TANK ~ OTHER ~ ~ SOURCEOF DI~HARGE CAUSE(S) ~ : T,,K~,K ~UNKNOWN : OVERFILL : RUP~R~FAILURE ~ SPILL ~ 0 ~ PIPING L~K ~ OTHER ~ ~RROSION ~, UNKNOWN ~ OTHE" ~ ~ ~ CHECK ONE ONLY ~ } ~ UNDE~RMINED ~ SOiL ONLY ~ G~UNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER- (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HA~ AC~ALLY BEEN AFFEC~O) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ : NO ACTION TAKEN ~ PRELIMINARY S'~ A~ESSMENT ~RKP~N SUBMI~ED : POLLUTION CHARACTERI~TION ~ ~ ~ LE~ BEING ~NFIRMED ~ PRELIMINARY SI~ ASSESSMENT UNDERWAY ~ POST CLE~UP MONITORING IN PROGRESS ~ REMEDIATION PLAN ~ CASE CLOSED(CLE~UP~MPLE~DOR UNNECESSAR~ ~ CLE~UP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION ~ ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TREATGROUNDWA~R(G~ REP~CE SUPPLY (RS) ~ o ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~ TREA~ENT AT H~P (HU) ~ VENT ~lL ~S) ~ VACUUM EXTRACT (VE) ~. OTHER (O~ ~ ~ ~ ;C~ ~, ~ :-~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HSC ~ (~0) EMEkGE~CY Leak Bein~ Confirme~ - Lemk suspected at site. but has not been confirmed. %ndicate whether emergency :cai~onze personnel and eq~ai~ment were ir~$otved Preliminary Site Assessment WorkDian Submittsd - wozkplan/proposal at a~y tame. If so, a i~aac~' h~s Material incident Report should be filed ~equ~sted of/submitted by rssponsible p~ty to dete~ine whether ground with the State Offic~ of ~2~W,e cv Services (ORS} at 2800 ~eadoe~,iew Read, water has been~ or will be, impacted as ~ result of the -~ - = Sac.ramento~ CA 95832. Co?~e~ of Lb~ ORS r~port form may be obtained at Preliminary Sits Assessment Underway ~ implementation of workplan. your local under{lround st{.~ra{~e tank permitting agency, indicate whether Pollution Characterization - responsible party ia in the process of fully the ORS report has beer] fi}ed ~s of the date of this report~ definins th~ extent cf contamination in soil ~%d greed water and assessing i~pacts on surface and/or gze~nd water. L%~ A~ENCY ONLY Remediation Plan - remediation pl~ s~mitted evaluating lonE term To avoid duplicate noti'fi,:atj<~n ~su.rsuant to Health ai]d Safety code Section remediation options. Proposal and i~kemsntstion schedule for appropriate 2~i80~5~ a gOVernment en~?[~ew<~ s~ ~v~[~ sign and date the forum in this b!ock~ remediahion options als~ submit%ed. significant threat to ht~a~ he~:lt, h or s~fety~ on]j that ~otific~tion Post Cleanup Monitori~ in Pro,ross - periodic ground water or otter of remedial activities. REPORTED BY Case Closed - regional board and local ~Eency in concurrence tha~ no _ ~-~3~;p~ ,,re hU~:~be.r, alid s~dress, indicate ~nich party you further work is necessa~ at the site, ~epresent and prove, de c~m~p~.r:? ot agency iMPORT~uNT: THE iNFO~TiON ~ROVIDED ON THIS FOPd4 iS IN~ED FOR RESFONSIRI. E PARTY STATiSTiC~~OSES~ O~Y ~ i$ NOT TO BE CO~,~[~R ~ n AS ~PF~SENTING THE Enter nemco, tel~,phone nu~i'>e~ , conL,~ct person~ and address of the party OFFICIAL POSITION OF ~Y GOVER~[T~ 'A~NCY Yes,)ansi. tlc for 'bi'~e 1.~-.~K, Yhi.~ %:~:d:~onsibl. e party would no.ally be the ta~i o~er, RE~DI~ ACTION indicate which action have been used to cleanup or remediats the SiTE LOCAEiON Descriptions of options follow: Enter information regardi~u~ the tank facility. At a mini~, you must pre,vide the facility name a~wt full address, Cap Site - install horizontal impe~eabie layer h~ reduce rainfall infiltration. iMPI,EME~TiNG AGENCIES Conhai~en~ Barrier - install vsrticai dike to block horizontal movement of E~tsr names of tbs .i~}ca[ ~(}~ ~y and .~esior~aJ. Water Quality Control ~oard contaminant, involved. Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil ~d dispose in approved $UBSYANCES i~JOLVED Excavate ~d Treat - remove cont~inated soil and %rear -',includes spreading Enter the name and quar~tiLF ~ost: of the hazardous substance involved. ~oom or land farming). is provided for in~ormatio~ c~ t~o substences if appropriate. If more than Remove Fr~e Produc~ - remove floaging produc~ fr~ water tsb!e, two substances leake~, .l.i.~t tbs ~wa of mos% concern for ~ieanup. ' Pump and Tre~t ~roun~wa~er - ~snerally employed to re--ye dissolved cent ~inants. DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT Enhanced Biode~radation - use of ~ny available %ecDmology %o promote Provide information regar~i:~ the discovery and abatement of the leak. bacterial decomposition of contaminants. Remiace Sup~!y - provide alternative water supply %o affected parLi~s~ SOURCE/CAt'SE Treatment s5 ~ookup - install wa%er treatment devicss at each dwellin~ or Indzcats source(s) ef ~eak~ Check boxier) indicating cause of !e~, other place of use. Uacum~ Extract - use p~ps or blowers to draw air through soil. CASE YYPE Ve~t Soil - bore holes in soil to allow volatilization of contaminants. indicate ~he case type cahe~,'>ry for this ieee. Check one box only. Case No Action Re~ired - incident is mino~, re~irinE no r~edial action, ty~e is based on tY~e most ser~sli, ive resource affected. For ex,plo, beth soil and 8round wares: i'~a~re been affected, case type will be "Ground C~-24ENTS - Use this space 6o elaborate on any aspects of the incident. Water", indic~te ~'[}rin]<i~:~ Water" ertly if one or ~rs ~nicipal or domestic wa%er wells haw%- act, ua]iy been affected, A "Ground Water" SIGNATURE - Sign the form in %he space provided. designation does not imY;i? that ~"=~ affected water caB~ot he or is not. used for drip/king ~ater~ bu, t only %hat water wells have noh yet been DISTRIBUTION affected, it is underatoo~ hhaL case typs may ch~ge u~on further if ~he form is c~npleted by hhe ta~ o~er or his aEen%~ retain the last copy investigation, and forward the remaining copies intact %o your local ta~ permitting agency ~n~_~r distribution. CI3~RENT STATUS i, Original - [,heal Tank Permi~%ing Agency ~,~c~o~ the current status of the case 2 Regional %~ater Quality Control Beard Cheek one box ~n!y, Th~ response sbol~,!.d be relative ~o %he case type. For 3. Local Health Officer and County Eoard of Supervisors or %heiz designee example, if case ty'pe i~ ~<~reund Watei"~ then "Current Status" should refer rec~ive Proposition 65 notifications. to the status of the grour~i wa~0r invest~igation or cleanup, as opposed to 4. fa=~ler/responsib!e party. that of soil. Descriptions of c[?tions follow: No Action Taken - No act.i, ol~ bas been taken by responsible party beyond initiaI rs'port ~ D March 5, 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson c/o John W. Ivy, Senior Vice President San Joaquin Bank P.O. Box 9129 Bakersfield, CA 93389 FIRE CHIEF RON ~R~.E RE Underground Storage Tank Removal at the former Holden Truck Stop 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard in Bakersfield, CA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 Dear Messrs. Jimerson & Ivy, VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 I have reviewed the Site Contamination Work, Health and Safety Plan, dated SUPPRESSION SERVICES February 2001 and prepared by AJ Environmental, Inc. The plan indicated that 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ' "(p)revious work performed in February 1998, found diesel and gasoline VOICE (661)326-3941 contaminated soil and groundwater..." (p.3). Because groundwater has been FAX (661) 395-1349 found to be affected at this site, this Office is hereby transferring oversight of the PREVENTION SERVICES soil and groundwater investigation phase to the Central Valley Regional Water 1715 ChesterAve. Quality Control Board. A copy of the above referenced plan, together with a Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 copy of the City's regulatory file for this site, will be submitted to the Board FAX (661)326-0576 under separate cover for their review and comment. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 ChesterAve. With regard to the possible remaining illegally abandoned 12,000 gallon diesel Bakersfield, CA 93301 tank reportedly located south of the scalehouse, this Office is still the lead VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 regulatory agency concerning its ultimate removal and proper closure. TRAINING DIVISION The enclosed (ostensibly scaled) drawing on file with this Office may be 5642 Victor Avo. Bakersfield, CA 93308 beneficial in helping to direct the location of the trenching proposed by AJ VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Environmental. You may also want to consider employing another geophysical method (e.g. gravity survey, ground penetrating radar, etc.) to help precisely locate the buried tank prior to its excavation. In any event, I would suggest that AJ Environmental consider extending out, or else moving, the excavation in a northerly direction as the proposed trench appears to be located south of where the tank is at in the original drawing. A tank removal permit is required to be obtained through this Office prior to actual removal once the tank is found. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services enclosures I Ol~ete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) l B. Dateof Delivery I ~Iit F if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. c. Signatu~ . · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X~ ~ D~ddresseeAgent or on the front if space permits. - D. Is delive~ addre~ different f~m item 1. A~icle Addressed to: If YES, ent~delive~ address below: / D No ~ Codified Mail D Exp ~ Registered ~ Re~c~Me~se 2. A~icle Number (Copy from se~ice label) ~ ~-~ '~ ~S ~~ 1999 Domestic Re~urn Reseipt January26,2001 Mr. Charles Jimerson ~ c/o Mr. John Ivy, Senior President Frae c.l~ San Joaquin Bank ~o~ ;RAZE 4600 California Avenue CERTIFIED MAIL Bakersfield Ca 93309 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 P~E: 12,000 Gallon Diesel Tank Located at 3775 Buck Owens Blvd. VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 NOTICE OF VIOLATION SUPPRESSION SERVICES SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Dear Messrs Jimerson & Ivy: FAX (661) 395-1349 This office has carefully reviewed both site maps and phase II reports associated PREVENTION SERVICES with underground tanks formerly located at the above referenced site. ~ 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 There is overwhelming evidence to support that a 12,000 gallon diesel tank is still on the property and illegally abandoned. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 ChesterAve. This conclusion is supported by Mr. Jimerson as well. Therefore, prior to Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 February 26, 2001, this tank shall be removed in accordance with UFC FAX (661) 326-0576 7902.1.7.2.3. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. "Underground tanks which have been out of Bakersfield, CA 93308 service for a period of one year shall be VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 removed from the ground." Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation; and, should you have any questions concerning this Notice of Violation action or require further information, please feel free to call me at 661-326-3979. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Services by: Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm D January 25, 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson FraE C.~EF C/O Mr. John Ivy, Senior Vice President RON FRAZE San Joaquin Bank ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 4600 California Avenue 93309 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 RE: New Landowner Notification and Participation Requirements FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Messrs Jimerson & Ivy: 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3941 This letter is to inform you of new legislative requirements FAX (661) 305-1349 pertaining to cleanup and closure of sites where an unauthorized release of PREVENTION SERVICES hazardous substance, including petroleum, has occurred fi.om an 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 underground storage tank (UST). Section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the vOICE (661) 326-3951 Health & Safety Code requires the primary or active responsible party to FAX (661) 326-0576 .notify all current record owners of fee title to the site of: 1) a site cleanup ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES proposal, 2) a site closure proposal, 3) a local agency intention to make a 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 determination that no further action is required, and 4) a local agency VOICE (661) 326-3979 intention to issue a closure letter. Section 25297.15(bt requires the local FAX (661) 326-0576 agency to take all responsible steps to accommodate responsible TaAINIna DIVISION landowners' participation in the cleanup or site closure process and to 5642 Victor Ave. - Bakersfield, CA 93308 consider their input and recommendations. VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 For purposes of implementing these sections, you have been identified as the primary or active responsible party. Please provide to this agency, within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a complete mailing list of all current record owners of fee title to the site. You may use the enclosed list of landowners form (sample letter 2) to comply with this requirement. If the list of current record owners of fee title to the site changes, you must notify the local agency of the change within twenty (20) calendar days fi.om when you are notified of the change. Landowner Notifiaction Page 2 If you are the sole landowner, please indicate that on the landowner list form. The following notice requirements do not apply to responsible parties who are the sole landowner for the site. In accordance with Section 25297.15(a) of Ch 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, you must certify to the local agenCY that all current record owners of fee title to the site have been informed of the proposed action before the local agency may do any of the following: 1) consider a cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) 2) consider a site closure proposal 3) make a determination that no further action is required 4) i'ssue a closure letter You may use the enclosed notice of proposed action form (sample letter 3) to comply with this requirement. Before approving a cleanup proposal or site closure proposal, determining that no further action is required, or issuing a closure letter, the local agency will take all reasonable steps necessary to accommodate responsible landowner · participation in the cleanup and site closure process and will consider all input and recommendations from any responsible landowner. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosures S:\USTFORMS\UST.L4 Sample Letter (2): List of Form Date: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Howard H. Wines, III 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Certified List of Record Fee Title Owners for Site name Site address Fill out item 1 if there are multiple site landowners. If you are the sole site landowner, skip item 1 and fill out item 2. 1. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Chapter 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible party certify that the following is a complete list· of current record fee title owners and their mailing addresses for the above site: 2. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible party certify that I am the sole landowner for the above site. Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible party Name of primary responsible party Sample Letter (3) Notice of Prope Action Submitted to Local Agency · Date: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Howard H. Wines, III 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Notice of Proposed Action Submitted to Local Agency for Site name Site address In accordance.with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, , certify that I have notified all Name of primary responsible party responsible landowners of the enclosed proposed action. Check space for applicable action(s): cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) site closure propgsal local agency intention to make a determination that no further action is required. __ local agency intention to issue a closure letter. : -- Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible party - Name of primary responsible party CC: (Names and addresses of all record fee title o .wners) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD "~ FIRE DEPARTMENT '~ '~ N \1 OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ,~_ .~ 1715 CHESTER AVENUE ,~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 ~" (~ January 24, 2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ]~r. Mike Chapman, Chief Environmental Health Specialist VOICE (661) 326-3941 Kern County Environmental Health Services FAX (661 ) 395-1349 2700 M Street SUPPRESSION SERVICES Bakersfield, Ca 93301 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)395-1349 RF.: Status of County Oversight of UST Cases in the City PREVENTION SERVICES Dear Mike: 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 The attached letter came to our attention during a current attempt to justify FAX (661)326-0576 closure under the City's recent removal permit. Amy's letter was very ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES carefully drafted; the only issue we have is that our office was not copied 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 on this decision at the time. VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 This recalls the broader issue of keeping our Office continually (Quarterly) TRAINING DIVISION informed on the status of all County oversight cases remaining within the 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 City'S jurisdiction. VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Please keep us "in the loop" so we can do our job using the best information available from your end. Thanks. Office of Environmental Services attachment San February 20, 2001 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Wines: Enclosed is the form you requested to be signed by the current fee title owners of Holden Truck Plaza. The only one is Charles H. Jimerson. We apologize for the delay. Mr. Jimerson was in the process of moving from the East Coast area to Arizona, and we were unable to get the form signed Until today. Please contact me if I can answer any questions. , Sincerely, hn W y JWI:sw Enclosure 4600 California Avenue, P.O. Box 9129, Bakersfield, California 93389, (661) 281-0325 FAX {661) 281-0333 FEB-20-O1TUE 10:38 AH Ffl× NO. P, 02 661-~95-147~N JOROUIN ~RNK 021 9S9 P02/04 FEB 28 '01 18:26 Date: 2/8/0.1. City of Bakersfield Fire Dq~adment Office of Environmental Services c/o Howard H. Wines, II1 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Certi£ed List of Record Fee Title Owners for Holden Truck Plaza S[tc name 3775 Buck Owens BI~d.f ~aker~field, CA 93308 Fill out item I ii'there are multjpl0 sltc landown~s. Ir'you are tho s01e site landowner, skip item ! and flu out item 2. 1. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Chapter 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, ~c~tify that the following is a complete llst of current record fee title own~'s and their mailing addresses for the above site: 2. In accordance with seaion 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of thc Health & Safety Code, I, Charle~ H. Jim~r~on Namz of priml~ry r~pon~ibl¢ patty certify that I am the sole landowner for the above site. Sincerely, / N~zne of primary rc~ponsiblc party D January 24, 2001 Mr. Charles H. Jimerson c/o Mr. John Ivy, Senior Vice President San Joaquin Bank 4600 California Ave Bakersfield Ca 93309 RE: Laboratory Results From Preliminary Site Assessment Conducted at the Former Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck Owens Blvd. Permit #BR-0271. FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Dear Messrs Jimerson & Ivy: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H" Street I have reviewed the results of the tank removal report, dated December 2000, Bakersfield, CA 93301 prepared by AJ Environmental. The findings of the report "demonstrates that VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 soil contamination above action levels for [Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel] (TPH-Diesel) was found beneath the two -12,000 gallon diesel tanks..." SUPPRESSION SERVICES (p.7). Additionally, in my telephone conversation with Mr. Charles Jimerson 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 this day, he confirmed, what the regulatory records indicate, that an additional VOICE (661) 326-3941 12,000 gallon diesel tank remains abandoned in a location south of the scale FAX (661) 395-1349 house. A letter addressing the required removal of the remaining illegallY PREVENTION SERVICES abandoned 12,000 gallon diesel tank will be sent, in care of you, under separate *1715 Chester Ave. cover. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 This office requires (in accordance with Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and · Safety Code and Chapter 16, Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations) that ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES further assessment be done to define the vertical and horizontal extent of the 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 contamination plume. VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 Please submit a work plan for further assessment, to the office, within 30 days TRAINING DIVISION from receipt of this letter. The work plan should follow guidelines found in: 5642 Victor Ave. Appendix A - Reports, Tri - Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 Preliminary evaluation and Investigation of Underground Tank Sites; 30 August FAX (661) 399-5763 1991. Additionally, be advised that oversight cost for this project will be billed to you at a rate of $80.00 per hour. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosure cc: AJ Environmental RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: '.~ -7'7 ~ ~o~,~ ~,.,~ G~--,._.-,J~ ID# Business Name: ~~ ~[~ Contact Name: ~&~ ~ ~~ Business Phone: ~og. ~o?. ~//~ ~: ~S- lB-. 3,~ Inspector's Name: ~ Time of Call: Date: [/e3/~ / Time: /~ · Min: Type of O~l: Incoming [ ] Outgoing [~' Returned [ ] Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: A J EnVironmental,Inc. 4600 Easton Drive, Suite 101, Bakersfield, CA 93309 Bus: (661)327-7429 Fax: (661)327-1707 December 29, 2000 Mr. Steve Underwood City of Bakersfield Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Holden Truck Stop Tank Removal 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California 93308 Dear Mr. Underwood' A J Environmental, Inc. is pleased to present this Tank Removal Report of the five tanks that were removed from Holden Truck Stop by Lutrel Trucking, Inc. The property is located at 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard, Bakersfield, California. Please contact me if you should have any questions or require additional information. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Sincerely, A J ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Michael A. Feldman, R.E.A. President Gulf Street I ', I I IFormer I Building ~ o= i~:i~i~i:~! .~___st o r ~ g~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: U G Tanks ] 0 0 0 0 ~ F°~srmer ~ pense~ I Getty Street I LEGEND I ~ Underground Tank O Former Aboveground Tanks SEC 23 T29S R27E AJEI 4100 Easton Drive, #12 Bakersfield, CA93309 (805) 327-7429 Fax 1805) 327-1707 ~ Present Dispenser KERN COUNTY,CA SAN JOAQUIN BANK ~ Former Dispenser SCALE: 1"= 50' PHASE II SITE ASSESSMENT HOLDEN TRUCK STOP Tower Corner BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA GROUNDWATER TEST BORING LOCATION MAP · Groundwater Test Boring EXHIBIT 1 }DATE: FEBRUARY 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL I-~ALTH SERVICSS D£PAKTME~T Application Date'~-/~- 2700 "M" STREET, SUIT~ 300 ~o. of Wells/Boring: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 PTONo.: ~)~'~ . APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR MONITORING WELLS This application is to: [] Construct [] Modify~. [] Destroy Type of well/boring [] Groundwater [] Cathodic Protection ,~Test Hole [] Other · .: :~%:: :~.:.~i::::: .~.:.O~S::i::I~IFO~O~i~:.~ .... :i~?~i?~!iiii!~i::::~?:.!~ ,~TO /~ Address 3 77--f'/°/~'~'C~/~'O/~ D state ~/o zip ? J 2 o .'f[ Phone GENERAL CON~I~ONS OF ~IS PERMIT FOR CONS~UC~ON: I. Well site approval is ~q~d before beginnin~ ~y wo~ ~h~d ~ weii co~c~o~ It ~ ~a~l to con~ue wo~ pa the s~e at which ~ ~don is mqu~d ~le~ i~mion is waived or comple~ 2. O~er rcqu~d ~o~ ~ciude: c~du~or c~g, aH ~u~ se~ ~d ~ co~on fe~s. 3. A phone call to ~e Dep~em o~ce. is requ~d on ~e mom~g of ~e ~y ~ wo~ is to commence nd 24 horn befol · e placement of my se~ or piu~. 4. Co~on ~r ~ Pe~it m suoject to ~y ~o~ by Dep~en~ 5. All wei~ co~med of PVC lo~d at a conjured sim whe~ de--on may occ~ or ~ve no d~on is occ~g or hn o~ 6. ~y mi~pmsenmdon or noncompli~ce wi~ req~d Pe~it Con~tio~ or ~ce will result ~ i~,~-ce of a "STO 7. A copy of ~e Dep~ent of Waif Keso~ea D~HcF's ~epo~ ~ well ~ copi~ builm of weih m~ be su~i~ed to ~e En~en~ Hc~ Se~ices Dep~em wi~ 14 ~ys wo~ G~ERAL CONDI~ONS OF ~IS PERMIT FOR DES~UC~ON: 1. A well des~cdon application m~ be filed wi~ ~ Dcp~ent if a well is be~g des~yed ~at is ~ h conjure wi~ a te~ hole pe~i~. Deletion precedes m~t be followed ~ per ~-50. 3. Placemem of ~e se~ m~ be wim~ed by a re~senmdve of ~ Dep~en~ Twen~-fo~-ho~ ad--ced notice mqu~ed for ~ appo~ent. SPECIAL CONDI~ONS: THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVE~ WELL CONSTRIJCTION INFORMATION WELL DEPTH ~.0 ~ GROUND ELEVATION (IF KNOWN) BOREHOLE DIAMETER 8'/'~ ~/ CASING-INSIDE DIAMETER CASING MATERIAL & GAUGE SCREEN MATERIAL & GAUGE - TYPE OF BENTONITE PLUG & DEPTH ~' t,~;~; ANNULUS SEALANT & DEPTH ~v~-~ FILTER PACK MATEKIAL & SCKEEN SLOT SIZe. & LENGTH SEALANT PLACEMENT METHOD LOCKING. WELL CAP ----- FACILITY PLOT PLAN Provide a do~riptioa of the facility to bo monitored, including: location of monitoring and placement, nearest street or inte~ection, location of any water wells or ~ffar.~ within 500' radins of facility;, please attach. ZONE OF INFLUENCE Information on zone of influence, such as mathematical calculations or field test data, may be requirec VADOSE ZONE WELLS upon r~view of the application. WELL DI=$Ti~UCTION INFORMATION WELL DEPTH o~ O t CASING MATEKIAL ---- DESCRIBE DESTRUCTION PROCEDURE: I have read and agree to comply with the general conditions noted ~Tti~ pgrmit rn~t ~her the contractor ~r ~,~r. O~"s Sig~m~ D~ ,~et~acmr's Si~m~:~ / Date TH~S A~HCATION B~COM~S A PERMIT WH~ A~ROVED R E C E I P T PAGE 1 02/18/98 Invoice Nbr. 1 ;2:57 pm KERN CO RI£SOURCE MANAGEMIEI,IT AGENCY 2700 'M' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Type of O'r~Je'r W CASH REGISTER A J I~ZNVIRONMENTAL INC IH0218982 I CSR I 02/18/98 I 02/18/98 ICK 1125 LF I NT ......................... I ~ I Line Description Quan'bity I:'rice Unit Disc Total 1 4751 TEST HOLE (DESTROYED 1ST WELL) 1 225.00 E 225.00 HMW04A O'rde'~ Total 225.00 "~'"~"' / ~ou~t Due Payment Made By Check 885.00 THANK YOU ~ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SE~t~ES DE!=ARTMENT ~ R AN E Y STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S., Director ~ DA VID PRICE III, RMA DIRECTOR 2700 'M' STREET, SUITE 300 ~ Community Development Program Department BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301-2370 Engineering & Survey Servioe~ Department Voice: (805) 862-8700 Environmental Health Service~ Department FAX: (805) 802.8701 r Planning Department TW Relay:. (800) 735.2929 Roada Department e-mail: eh@ln~naoun~n=om December 11, 1997 A J Environmental Attn: Mike Feldman 4100 Easton Drive, Suite 12 Bakersfield, CA 93309 SUBJECT: Closure of Remedial Investigation at Holden Truck Plaza PTO # 050037 Dear Mr. Feldman: On October 10, 1985, Chuck Jimerson~ of Holden Truck Plaza, wrote a letter to this department summarizing his plans to manage contaminated soil which had been excavated after tank removal on property located at 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. Mr. Jimerson's plan was to excavate approximately 6,156 cubic feet of soil in a new location called the "receiving area," place a 60-mil high-density polyethylene liner within the excavation, and place 180 cubic feet of soil removed from the underground storage tank excavation within the lined pit. The surface of the area was covered with three inches of base material and three inches of asphalt. This proposal was reviewed and approved by Ann Boyce as a method for containment bf the contaminated soil on site. Ann Boyce's approval was evident by her signature on the letter submitted. This department views the site investigation described above as being closed, using techniques which were acceptable to the department at that tim~. Additional site investigations occurred at this address; this letter pertains only to the remediation described above. Please feel free to call me at (805) 862-8754 if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director.....~'~ ' Ha~ardbus Materials'Xg.g~ialist IV Uni/'/i~d Hazardous Materials/Waste Program AG:jrw (hm\grecn\holdcn.ltr) 6315 Snow Road f · Bakersfield, CA 93308 ' Fueling Systems Installation Phone (805) 399-0246 Lic. # 675587 Removal and Rem®diation Fax (805) 399-0311 Nov~nber 20, 2000 City of Bakersfield Steve Underwood Fax: 326-0576 St~v¢, As per our conversation on Monday, November 20, 2000 Lutrel Services, Inc. proposes the following work plan: As oil tank at south end of building is deteriorated such that it cannot be lifted out of excavation intact. Lutrel Services, Inc. will empty remaining product into excavation site, load tank remains and all contaminated soil into semi end dump trucks and transport tank and material to Chemical Waste Management Kettleman City for disposal. After removal Lutrel Services, Inc. will take samples at 2' and 6'. Please let me know if this is acceptable. Sincerely, Mark Lutrd ii1~1~000 i?:2~ 6i139903ii LUTREL TRUCKING PAGE al TRUCKING, 'INC. 6315 SNOW ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93305 Phone (661) 399-0246 * FAX (661) 399-0311 OLiR FAX, NUNBER '(661) 399-0311 c~A'ra: ~',, ~ ", '.TO: 'THIS FAX CONSISTS OF. ~ PAGES (,:INCLUDING THiS COVE:R SHE:E'F) NOTES: ' IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLENS RECEIVING THIS FAX, PLEASE CaLL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (661) 399-02~6. 11/28/2888 17:22 6113990311 LUTREL TRUCKING PAGE 03 4308 Armour Avanue (66~) Bakersfield. California S3~08 F~ (661) Lutrel Services Laboratory No: 0011169-1 6315 Snow Road Date Received: 11/10/00 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Date Reported: 11/16/00 Contract No. : Attention: Mark Lutrel Date Sampled : 11/01/00 T~me Sampled : 13:00 Sample T~e: C~ Solid Description: '~aste oil Tank contents, Old Lab ~0011018-1 Sampled by B. McNabb Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, 1311;%/1 Extractable RCRAMa~imum Concentration Concentration Constituents mg/1 mg/1 DLR Method/Ref Lead, Pb 0.42 5.0 0.05 6010A /1 Date Analyzed: 11/15/00 SMS /, ~' at ions Manager / CC: ~et hod Re£~re~ce 1. ~A $w-846. 1~9~ 3to Edition DLR ; Detection bimlt for Reporting 7. ~o CFR Peris 87-1~, 7-1-95 This repor~ is {~'nlshed f~r the e,xdueiYe use of our Customer arid appJles onJy ~o the ~ample~ 1~ted. Zako i~ not m~pc~bh~ for repot1' aJ~'erolian or delachment. D November 27, 2000 Mark Lutrel F~RE C.~EF Lutrel Services, Inc. RON FRAZE 6315 Snow Road A~mNIST~ATW~ SER~CES Bakersfield, CA 93308 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 RE: Request to Empty Product from Tank into Excavation at Former Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck Owens Blvd SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Lutrel: VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Your request to empty contents of tank into excavation and then remove it PREVENTION SERVICES along with surrounding soil is hereby denied. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 No deliberate discharge is allowed. You must physically remove contents through top of tank. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Should you have any additional questions, please feel fi'ee to contact me at · VOICE (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 661-326-3190. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. ~incerely, Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 ~ ~ FAX (805) 399-5763 Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm ~.e. BAKERSFIELD FIRE- DEPARTMII~ 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 --" (805) 326-3979 TANK REXOY~ INSPECTION FORM CONTRACTOR ~L)4~{~ ~-Cd~.~;~ /:~- ' CONTACT PERSON ~O~RY ~ k~%~ ' ~ OF S~LES. ~ ~ST ~ODO~ ~. T~a .T~ ~ · P~LI~Y ASSESS~T COl A.~. ~d~O~ACT PE~ON co~ ~c~ ~.~,~ nEn~ PLOT P~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD "~c{ ~/~ OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (805) 326-3979 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS 3775 Buck Owens Blvd. ZIP CODE 93308 APN332-093-12 & 13 FACILITY NAME Holden Truck Stop CROSS STREETS Gulf & Getty 'rANK OWNER/OPERATOR Charles H. Jimerson PHONE NO. 908-575-3193 MAll.lNG ADDRESS c/o Sa6-joaquin Bank PO Box 9129 CITY Bakersfield ZIP 93389 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION COMPANY Lutrel Truckinq, Inc. PHONE NO. 399-0421 LICENSE NO. 668440 ADDRESS 6315 Snow Road CITY Bakersfield ZIP 93308 INSURANCE CARRIER State Comp. Ins. Fund WORKMENS COMP NO. 344-112-00 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION COMPANY A J Environmental, Inc. PHONE NO. 327-7429 LICENSE NO. ADDRESS 4100 Easton Drive, Suite 12 CITY Bakersfield ZIP 93309 INSURANCE CARRIER American Safety Casualty Ins. WORKMENS COMP NO. 'rANK (:LEANING INFORMATION COMPANY Lutrel Trucking, Inc. PHONE NO. 399-0421 ADDRESS 6315 Snow Road CITY 63155nowR ZIP 93308 WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 075 NAME OF RINSATE DISPOSAL FACILITY Cmsby & Overton ADDRESS 1610 W. 17th Street CITY Long Beach, CA ZIP 90813 FACILITY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION C()MPANY Luff_el Truckino_ Inc_ PHONE NO. 399-0421 LICENSE NO. 668440 ADDRESS 6315 Snow Ro~d CITY Bakersfield ZIP 93308 TANK DESTINATION Golden State Metal Recyclers I. CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL TANK NO. AGE VOLUME STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED 1 15yrs 10,000 gal Gasoline 1985- 1998 None ....... .2. ..... _' _l.5_yrs 10,000 gal Gasoline 1985 - 1998 None 3 15 yrs 12,000 gal Diesel 1985- 1998 None 4 15 yrs 12,000 gal Diesel 1985 - 1998 None TI 11,: AI'I'I,ICANT I IAS RI.:CI.;.'IVI'.:I). [INI)I,:RS'['ANDS, AND WfL[, COMPI,Y WITH THE A'ITACIII.,'I) C()NI)ITI()NS OF TI IlS Iq.'RMI'I' ANI ) ANY ( )TI [I':R S'I'A'I'I.:, I,OCA[, AND FI.':DI':RAL REGULATIONS. TI IlS I:1 )RM I IAS III.:I!N COMI'I,I.:'H.:I) UNI)ER i)I~NAI,'I'Y OF I)EILIURY. AND TO 'HIE BI!ST O1.' MY KNOWI,I!I)GI.; IS TRill! N~ Michael A. Feldman _~_~~, ~..~.~-~'~-% APl'R( )V AI'PI,ICANT NAME (PRIN'[') APPI,ICANT SIGNAT[IR[': THIS APPLICATION BECOME A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED ~ . Gulf Street I I ~ IiFormer I I I~ ,ulng"-'u:'-':-- I I I I I L------,I Storage .~_Dispenser ~Shed I --Line Office Building 0000 Truck e> .-. Repair c Scale --->n o Shop o House Tire Shop Tire Storaae.._; Getty Street AJ E I 4100 Easton Drive, #12 Bakersfield,CA 93309 (661) 327-7429 Fax (661) 327-1707 LEGEND SEC 23 - T29S - R27E SAN JOAQUIN BANK ~ Dispenser KERN COUNTY, CA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL HOLDEN TRUCK STOP Scale: 1" = 50' 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 1 ~ DATE: OCTOBER 2000 August 9, 2000 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Christopher Burger Klein, DeNatale, Goldner ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 21Ol 'H" Street P.O. Box 11172 Ba~ers~e~d, CA ~3301 Bakersfield, Ca 93 3 89-1172 voice (661)a26-a~41 FAX (661)395-1349 CERTIFIED MAIL 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 P-u~_Z Temporary Closure of UST's at Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck VOICE (661)326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Owens Blvd., Bakersfield, Ca. PREVENTION SERVICF..~ Dear Mr, 1715 Chester Ave. Burger: Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661)326-0576 I am in receipt of your letter dated July 17, 2000. Your request for a extension to your temporary closure at the above mentioned address is ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. granted until December 31, 2000. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at 326-3190. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 omcere~y, FAX (661) 399-5763 Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of En~ronmental Services by: Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services CC: John Ivy KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP Anthony J. Klein LAWYERS Jennifer A. Adams Thomas V. DeNatale, Jr. T. Scott Belden Barry L. Goldner 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE Catherine E. Bennett J. L. Rosenlieb SECOND FLOOR David D. Blaine David J. Cooper BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Craig D. Braun Claude P. Kimball St&an S. Lawrence William A. Bruce MAILING ADDRESS: Nicole M. Misner Leonard K. Welsh P.O. BOX 11172 Nancy L. Oehler Christopher P. Burger BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-1172 Michelle D. Palla Ned E. Dunphy (661) 395-1000 Timothy G. Scanlon Mel Ehrlich FAX (661) 326-0418 Jean M. Stroud Thomas C. Fallgatter E-MAIL kleinlaw~kleinlaw.com Kevin C. Findley Kenneth A. Holland OF COUNSEL Krystyna L. Jamieson Bruce F. Bunker July 17, 2000 Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, Califomia 93301 Re: Temporary Closure Permit 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Underwood: Since our last correspondence to you concerning the above-referenced matter on December 20, i 999, Morgan Corporation, the listing broker, has mailed nearly 200 fact sheets to various trucking, oil- related businesses and leasing and rental companies. In addition, all commercial brokers in the area were sent fact sheets conceming the property. Numerous inquiries conceming the property have been fielded by the Morgan Corporation and at least two offers on the property have been received. The first offer was countered but did not result in a sale. The second offer is still under active consideration and negotiation. Please accept this status report as fulfilling the requirements to continue the temporary closure permit for the facility for the remainder of 2000. Should you require further or additional information, please feel free to contact me. V,er!/tj~y yours, 00119836.DOC KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNEI~ COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP Anthony J. Klein LAWYERS Jennifer A. Adams Thomas V. DeNatale, Jr. T. Scott Belden Barry L. Goldner 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE Catherine E. Bennett J. L. Rosenlieb SECOND FLOOR David D. Blaine David J. Cooper BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Craig D. Braun Claude P. Kimball Stefan S. Lawrence William A. Bruce MAILING ADDRESS: Nicole M. Misner Leonard K. Welsh P.O. BOX 11172 Nancy L. Oehler Christopher P. Burger BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-1172 Michelle D. Palla Ned E. Dunphy (661) 395-1000 Timothy G. Scanlon Mel Ehrlich FAX (661) 326-0418 Jean M. Stroud Thomas C. Fallgatter E-MAIL kleinlaw~kleinlaw.com Kevin C. Findley Kenneth A. Holland OF COUNSEL Krystyna L. Jamieson Bruce F. Bunker April 4, 2000 Mr. Howard Wines, III Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Holden Truck Plaza Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Wines: Pursuant to our recent telephone conversation, enclosed please find a copy of the Phase I and Phase II Site Assessment Reports performed in 1998 on the above property. Should you have questions or require further information, please feel free to contact me. CPB:jm Encs. as noted cc: Mr. John W. Ivy 00111410.DOC FII E Il T December 23, 1999 Christopher Burger Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Rosenlieb & Kimball, LLD FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE P.O. Box 11172 Bakersfield, CA 93389-1172 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE8 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 CERTIFIED MAiL VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 RE: Temporary Closure of UST's at Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H' Strut Owens Blvd, Bakersfield, CA Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE {805) 326-3941 FAX (sos) 395-1349 Dear Mr. Burger: PREVENTION ~ERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. I am in receipt of your letter dated December 20, 1999. Your Bakemfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3951 request for a extension to your temporary closure at the above mentioned FAX (805) 326-0576 address is granted until 6-1-2000. Further extension may be provided if ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES we receive periodic updates as to your progress in securing a buyer. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to FAX (805) 326-0576 contact me at 326-3979. TRAJNING DIVISION 5r~2 Wmr Ave. o, ,y~:nceret", Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 FAX (805) 399-5763 Ralph E. Huey, Director · . Office of Enviromental Services by: Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm cc: John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank ~kLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP Anthony J. Klein LAWYERS Jennifer A. Adams Thomas V. DeNatale, Jr. T. Scott Belden Barry L. Ooldner 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE Catherine E. Bennett J. L. Rosenlieb SECOND FLOOR David D. Blaine David J. Cooper BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Nicole M. Misner Claude P. Kimball Nancy L. Oehler William A. Bruce MAILING ADDRESS: Timothy G. Scanlon Leonard K. Welsh P.O. BOX 11172 lean M. Stroud Christopher P. Burger BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-1172 Ned E. Dunphy (661) 395-1000 Mci Ehrlich FAX (661) 326-0418 OF COUNSEL Kevin C. Findley E-MAIL kleinlaw~kleinlaw.com Bruce F. Bunker Kenneth A. Holland Thomas C. Fallgatter Krystyna L. Jamieson Craig D. Braun December 20, 1999 Steve Underwood, Inspector Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 ' "":.-., Re: Temporary Closure ofUST's Holden Truck Plaza 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard, Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Underwood: This is in response to your correspondence of October 19, 1999, concerning the above- referenced subject. Enclosed for your information and files is a copy of a real estate listing agreement between Mr. Jimerson and Morgan Corporation for the property. As you note in your letter, listing the property for sale has generated interest on the part of several potential purchasers. At this time, there are three potential purchasers who have the property under serious consideration. I would expect that the interest shown should ripen into an offer after the first of the year if at all. It is the agreed upon plan by the listing broker and Mr. Jimerson that an aggressive campaign be mounted to sell this property. Enclosed is a letter from the Morgan Corporation listing potential purchasers to whom an informational mailer was sent. At such time as an acceptable offer is received, we will notify your office. In the meantime, I hereby request an extension of the temPorary closure of the UST's at this facility for the year 2000, until a sale can be achieved. 00103163.DOC ~LEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP Steve Underwood, Inspector December 20, 1999 Page 2 Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Ve.r,y t~ly yours, CPB:jm Encs. as noted cc: Mr. John Ivy 00103163.DOC October 19, 1999 FIRE CHIEF Christopher Burger RON FRAZE Klein, DeNatale, Goldner ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES P.O. Box 11172 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, Ca 93389-1172 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 CERTIFIED MAIL SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 R~: Temporary Closure of UST's at Holden Truck Plaza Located at VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 396-1349 3775 Buck Owens Blvd. PREVENTION SERVlCE~ Dear Mr. Burger: 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 This is a reminder that the temporary closure at the above mentioned site will expire on January 1, 2000, after which time these tanks ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 ChestorAve. will be considered illegally abandoned. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 This office would like to request an update on your progress toward compliance. It is noted that several firms have made requests TRAINING DIVISION 5642 VictorAve. through our office to review Holden's file in the last 90 days. We would Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661)399-4697 appreciate a status report on any sale or pending sale of the above FAX (661) 399-5763 mentioned property. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm cc: John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank ,0 D FIIIE T July 9, 1999 FIRE CHIEF Christopher Burger RON FRAZE Klein, DeNatale, Goldner ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES P.O. Box 11172 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 93389-1172 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 RE: Temporary Closure of UST's at Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck SUPPRESSION SERVICES Owens Blvd 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 Dear Mr. FAX (805) 395-1340 ~ur~er: PREVENTION SERVICES The conditions for temporary closure, outlined in our meeting of 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 April 16, 1999, have now been completed by Calpi Inc. VOICE (805) 320-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 You are hereby granted temporary closure on the above mentioned ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES site until January 1, 2000. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at 326-3979. TRAINING DMSION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Sincerely, VOICE (805) 399-4697 FAX (805) 399-5763 Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Services by: Steve Un erwood, nspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm cc: John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank P.O. Box 6278 · Bakersfield, California 93386 Tel: (661) 589-5648 · Fax: (661) 589-5312 FINAL CHRONOLOGICAL REPORT FOR: City of Bakersfield Office of Environmental Services ATTENTION: STEVE UNDERWOOD 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 DATES: 05-18-99 TO 06-30-99 LOCATION: Holden's Truck Plaza 3775 Buck Owens Boulevard Bakersfield, CA 93308 Services: 1. Pumped waste oil from aboveground tank and transported to Evergreen Oil to be recycled. 2. Rinsed one aboveground tank and four underground tanks in place. 3. Transported rinsate to oil recycler in Compton, CA. 4. Placed locks on four underground tanks fill caps. 5. Pumped all oils and anti-freeze for recycling. 6. Removed all oil filters for recycling.. 7. Package all containers of chemicals, cleaners, spray cans, and paints for disposal. 8. Removed tires to local county landfill. 9. Removed lights to ship to Arizona, for recycling. 10. Removed drums and pallet boxes to Class I disposal site. 05-18-99: Utilized sub-contractor, Coles Oil Recycling, to pump approximately 450 gallons of waste oil from one above ground tank. Oil was transported to Evergreen Oil in Fresno, CA on manifest #98597435 (Enclosure #1). 05-25-99: Rinsed four underground tanks and one aboveground tank in place using a hydroblast pump and !20 bbl vacuum truck to collect the rinsate. Low LEL was not a factor at this time; however, removal of all product (diesel or gasoline) was a major consideration. Upon completion of rinsing tanks, all fuel caps were locked and rinsate was transported to DeMenno/Kerdoon in Compton, CA on manifest #96713036 (Enclosure #2). 05-28-99: Separated all oils, gasoline, and diesel from other products at the site and set up for transferring fluids on June 1, 1999 by Cole's Oil Recycling. FRESNO, CALIFORNIA (559) 233-3828 SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA (805) 925-2231 City of Bakersfield Page 2 July 8, 1999 06-01-99: Cole's Oil Recycling was one location to pump all various size containers and drums with oil into vacuum truck. Separated all Chemicals by liquid/solid and by hazard classification. Lab packed or bulk chemicals to drums and pallet boxes and prepared for disposal. Cole's Oil Services removes one - 30 gallon drum of oil filters on Bill of Lading #3162 (Enclosure #3) to AJS Filter Processing, Inc., Industrial, CA. Cole's Oil Services came back to the site and pumped approximately 50 gallons of oily water. Also, Cole's pumped approximately 140 gallons of anti-freeze and transported both items to Evergreen Environmental in Fresno, CA on manifest #98597451 and #98597453 respectively (Enclosure g4 & #5). Approximately 36 (4'X6') lights were packaged and prepared for disposal. 06-03-99: All tires outside the caged area were loaded into a 20 yd. bin and transported by PFS Waste Services on special tire manifest #87792 (Enclosure ~6). 06-23-99: The package of 36 lights was picked up by Salesco Systems of Phoenix, AZ and transported to Phoenix, AZ on Bill of Lading #112750 (Enclosure #7) for recycling of the small amount of mercury contained within the light tubes. 06-29-99: CALPI, Inc. arrives at site to load 17 drums, ranging in size from 5 to 85 gallons, plus 2 cu. yd. pallet boxes to 40' flatbed truck for transportation to a Class I disposal facility. 06-30-99: CALPI, Inc. transported load of hazardous waste to Chemical Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman City, CA on manifest #96713027 (Enclosure #8). The waste was disposed of as direct landfill on-site and destructive incineration off-site. The rinsing of five tanks in place and removal of oils and chemicals is now complete. Sincerely cc: John W. Ivy, San Joaquin Bank CALPI Inc., P.O. Box 6278 * Bakersfield, CA 93386 · 0H)5") 589.5648 ° Fax'(895) 589-5312 :'::OM : COLE'S WASTE MANAGEMENT PHONE ND. : Jul 06 1999 04:05PM P02 · ,:~'ff~,i'~¥,r%: 'd;,~ ~;;;b,;~'f~, ;.e.o,, ,~,. U ~-W,~U .., ' ........................ ~ WAST~ MANIFEST ~ 3. G~na~O~'~ ~am~ and ~jli~B ~dd~e~ , · ,. · ' ' ~ 5, Trontp~r I Company Name 6. U~ ~PA JO Num~ L ~5 ?5. ~.,,,.~,.u,o~,,,,,~,,,,o.a~,.,,, · __. [..l~,r~-.t I I 1 I I 1 INum~. ' I ~:,' ~4,z~a~/~'. ~/I,. x., .,, ~I, ~ 1 ~. US ~OT Description {indudlng Proper ~hipp;~g Nome, Hazurd Ck~ss, nnd ID Number) 12. Co~oinors '~ ......... ~, 2 ' ' · ' · . ' '' ~ ~' "... ~ '~..",'~ .~ ~.'~'"~"'~ '"~?'""-'"~'~~~"~ , ~, '.b~c;~.'::'..' ,,.. ........ ,.,.,.. ;~',.: .,,'~[, ',,,,,......,,... i~: .... . ,.. %', . ,, ~... , . ..: :~ . .,~,~ ..~;. '.-~ .~.~.. ~ ~. / : ;!,..~~~~ .... ~ ,~~,/4/ ?* .27.~ ...... r M~Ib Dny Yoor '=~ ~'~olm~G~ //~ ~ ~: o~ ,,,;, ~,~ ~/~ ~2~~x ~~ ~?~,2 . .~ ~ .... ~ ~ I ..- ' ......... ,~ ..... ~' ' ~~"~" " · . I · · ~ ..... ~. ~.~ ...... ~..~~~~'"'~ ...... - ......... ' - ,t, -, ;,, ,i[$~'i',G~i;.i'.b'}'t~i'~l?~v.::j.-.:'.."., ;" "' ..... · ,,,,, ......... ' .. I I(I t~[. " ~...,m., ........ ;.~"~'?? ~', ...... ~ .....=? ' ~" ,':7':' t" ........ ,..'.', State of Cal~formo~Enwronmental Protection Agency Form Approved OMB NOl 2050-0039 (Expires 9-30-99) ~ See Instructions on back c~ 6. Department of Pleas~r~.m Or ,,~pe. Form des;geed for use on elFte ( 12-pitch]II~lll£'riter. .~ ge Toxic Substances Cm~lrc ~'- Sacramento California k UNIFORM HAZARDOUS i. Generator's 0S EPA ID No. Manifest ~ument No. 2. Page I Information in the shaded areas is not required by Federal law. 3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address C: ~/ s , ~ " ' _, _ .. _.. - , " .. ' _.~ ~. :.'..'.':.'~'-L'. .. · ' .. . ~ ,:, . D. ~ans~r~er*s Phon~ ., ]. ;': ;'.~ ' ~ ~;~..' 7.:":TransporterL '~'i4'~t2 Company//['"'d'~'Nome I",~b' "; ,;,,JL.'::,~' L~,' ig0..~1~1 ~'~,. ,~ ~,.~,t/F/I.:~ I ~Z-i~I/ ~.:' s.,.,,.,,,o..,,,,,;"' "'' :(E/~/' .,-,.: ~7-: :.':('. , I_~F.<.,_ . . . ...:'.i .... .,...... ': .... ..... :. :.' ... 9. ~signated Facilil~ Name an~Si~ A~dress I 10. US EPA ID Number G., ~te Facili~ts ID . ....: .'..' ' ": '. ' . .: . . ,, ,~,,.,,-,':~., ,"',~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I,,~l~ t~'1~ ~-;I/1~181~~ g!O'~"~' "- ' .... ~ I. US D~ D~scr~pt[~n ~incl,dl.g Proper Skipping N.~,, Hazard Closs. and ID Number} No. Type ~uon~i~ Wt/VoI I. Wo~m Nun~,r ' .. _'.:, ~...'.., :. -,.,~ .., .... ,, ~, ...',. R EPA/OIhe~ ; A II I IIII .;. T ~ d. State : ~ J .EPA/O~her ~ ~ IIiI~ll I · . . , . ~' ~ ~ ,~ ,- .. ,,.- / -, ~ '/ .... / t~. 'GEN~ATOR'~CERTIFI~ATION: I kere~y declare Ihat the contents~[~,s cons,gnmenr are r~ly and a;:~oleJy descr,~e~above ~y proper sh,~p,ng na~a~are class,~,ed, packed, marked, and labeled, and ore in all respects in proper condHian ~or tronsporl~y highway accordin~ Io applicable intemmional and nationalgovernmeat regulations. ; I~ I am a ,argo quanlily generator, I certi~ that I ~ave a pro,ram ~n place ~o reduce the volume and Ioxici~ of waste generated to Ihe degree I ha e determined to be economicall~  practicable a~d Ihal I have selected tko practicable meth~ of lreaimenf, storage, or d~sposal currepHy available to me which mlnim~zes lhe present and future I~reat lo human and tKe environment; OR, i~ I om a small quonl~ generalor. I have made a good fai$ effort lo minimize my waste generalion and selecl the best wasle management method that available ~o me an~ Ihal I can aiford. ,, i . _J ..,'. ~z'. ', t c'l"', ~ "/I-'/  17. Tronsoorler I Acknowledgement of ~eceip~ o~ Materi'~Js ~ " ' , ~ · , ~ ~:j..,.~ ,. .... 0 18. franspor~r'~Ac~nowledEemenl of Receipt of Moleriols ~ "[ ~ ............ 19. Discrepancy I~d;catlon Space J I 20 Facili~ Owner or Operator Certification of receipl o~ hazardous materials covered by this moni[est excepI as noted in Ilem 19. T Printed/Typed Na~e ~ S~gna~,. ~ ~on~ Day Year DO NOT WRITE BELOW ~HIS LINE.- DTsc 8022A (4/97) O~aon: TRANSp,r':~I(!'[:k~ RI;!Ai;4S EPA 8700--22  COLE'S SERVICES 316 2 Oil Filter Recycling P. O. Box 10764 · Bakersfield, CA 93389 '- EPA NO. CAL931545554 DATE I TERMS ~./1/'~q I BILL OF LADING I [- ADDRESS ',~':' ':' ' ' *: ' ~NTA~ PERSON~ I.PHONE NO. ' PURCH~E ORDER NO. '' ~ ~/c~t~q~, ~,,,~ " ~EC~w.~ ~u~v AJS Filter Processing, Inc. PO RO~ 90~86 .~ ADDRESS Industrial, CA 91715-0486 -:~ Cl~ ~ATE ~P PHONE PRICE AMOUNT QU~ UNIT DESCRI~ION UNIT ~ '0~ ~O ~:~'~-~ o~C ~'~¢S' 6~~ 6~ ~ . .'~:.< '....: ..-~-:".. ::.~:~? :.:': b .'.::'b...:¥.[ " :'. "' '" ":":::~.'.-':" ':'."- ;"'~:-'b~:P':":'..;.....:: :- '::.'.:.-.:-.'J:' ..~'. '.:'~'" ." ' [. PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE , /' / ~.- / ~/~., ~ . . f, Generator Signature FROM : £OLE'S WASTE MANAGEMENT PHONE NO. : Jul. 08 1999 09:54AM PO1 ?mm App~oYed 0~ ~o, 20~0-O039 (~p ~ 9-30-99) ~o~rm,,ento, ~lifornia ~ UNIFORM ~AZAROOUS Gm~ero~or'* US EPA ID No. . I~ not r~uked ~y ~om~ Iow. ~. G~(~ero)or~ Nome end ~fling I~ 6. US [pA ID Number ~ ~. ~ro~porlor I C~ml~l~y Name ' ' 11, US DO] De.cd ~lJ~ {j~dqdi,g Pr~p.I SJdpplng Namo, Naz~d C, Joi~, and ID -.~ ' I[ [um o large qu,nlJly goneroloh J certify th,t I huve ¢~ progrom in plato ~ ~ ) d/Typed Nomc * Sio~,c DO NOT WRIIE BELOW IHIS LINE, FROM : COLE'S WASTE MANAGEMENT PHONE NO. : ~ Jul. 06 1999 04:42PM P01 wAs~ ~ I*~rler 1 ~po~ N~m~ ...... 6. US ~I'A I& Numb** __~ ~ 8. US EPA ID Number 9. Deslgnaled Facllll~ Name ~ 5i~ Addre~ 10. US EPA ID Number ~i~.. US DOT Dm~ripllo, (Jnd~d;~g Pr~pm Shipping N~me. H~ord Cla~s, ~,d ID N,mb~,~ 13.~nt~l~ ~'~i b. ~-- ' ~ .... .... ~.~,.~ ...... ~,..,~. *~>j~..?~ ,'~" .' .,. ,.~ "~'~' · ........ .. '~; :,',.." . ',., ..... "1'.'~... '" "."-s~/;.,~,,',..,. ~. · . ..... ,./....' . ... , . . , . ~ ..~ ~'~ ~ -- ' . ~.~ . ~.~. ~ ' ,, :;:~ J, r In~ruclio~ on~ Add~l;onal In[ormation ', --. ' ~ ~ ' - ....... m.. ,. l..- .,, F//~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ .~ ':/. ' ~ ~. GENeRatOR'S C~IRC~ONz ~ ~reby ded~,~e d~m ~1~ c~n~ents o~h~ ¢~ ~m~nt me tul~ ond e¢<.UrntdV dasc~ib~ uJ~n hy pm~, d~ppln~ nnm~ and are da~*~fJed packed. /" i mor~d, and I~ ~ ~n~ ol'e in (,~1 ~pcct~ in p~pe, condition ~or ~ran~p~dby ~g~o~ ncco~di~ ~o ~ppl~aM~ intcrn~li~¢~ (~(1 nntional govm~enl available Io ma ~nd Ihul I c~n afford, ....... " ~'0 ~ ...... ~,. NOT WRITE 'BELOW THIS LINE. State of California '~ · Californ'l~l~tegrated Waste Management Bo~'d · CIWM~.-.62 (10/94) 8800 cai O~Rer Drive · Sacramento, CA 95826 ~"/ -- WASTE TIRE HAULER MANIFEST. -'~ o.'"%? s,?. e~:"PART ~..~ TO BE COMPL~ED'BY'REPREsENTATI~d~IRE DEALER OR WASTE TIRE GENERATOR' Tile Dealer/Generator (include Board of Equalization "Tire Recycling Fee Account Number") ..' Name&Address ~,3~3[~A Tt~.Lt ~[.~(~, . ~ ~ 'County ~';.e'~, ~,o/4,,..~'~"c) ~4~()~:{Are. Code) Telephone Number ~. (oG/J =;;'/- Oj:S .::.,::?~ Date of Pickup (Month/Day/Year) Cc/~] ~! ~ Whole Tires in this Shipment OR~ Volume of Tires in this Shipment Weight of Tires in This Shipment" -. (cubic yards) OR~ (Circle One) , pounds tons ce~ify.that the information provided above is true and correct. I ce~if~ that Pa~2(a) and Pa~ 3{dj were completed at the time of this certification. I am aware that falsification of this manifest may result in civil penalties .~ ad~i~s~r~ti~e civil penalties as described in PublicResources Code Section 42962 (al and (b). {See reverse side of this form) Waste ~re ~ale~/Generator Represent~e Signature ! '~'~,~- ? ,;, ,~ ::~, .- ,-: · k :~ ':;., '-2,'~": ~,, ,L'~",~%,~'~t>:,~ ~,:?,~: ~,;~> '..?~':::~-~.-~'3''.~.~,'::: '~ :,,:' ' ~'~:'~':..' ~,' :Jl~eerfify:,Xbatthe nfcrmation pr0vided.~a~0ve::iS t~Ue:and cor~ectT::,The~collectorJs.vehmle ~may c'ontam;:Several]oads:'from~ fferent~fire~generators'..~. "'howeve~;':eaCh Ioad~must be accompanied :by ~s',own:mamfest; .l~am:aware'z~at:fals~ficafionOf t~iS;.mamf~S~ ~yWes~E~:i~:~0spension~ revocation; or :aemal'~f ~enewal'of-:my:WasXeT~re Hauler:Reg~strat~On:aad.mawresult: m mwl-penaEmS:o~?admm~stCat~ve~c~wt:pena~es~as:descr~bed m;Pu~hC: .. ,: ~-: ' . :.Resources Code:Section 42962 {a) and (~)::(See reverse:si~:,0f:th s:form),: ,.:: :~, ' 4.~.::. '~- - ': ...... :' PART 3. TO BE COMPLETED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF WASTE TIRE HAULER AND DESTINATION SITE (a) TO BE COMPLETED BY WASTE TIRE HAULER. TO BE CORRECTED BY DESTINATION SITE IF DIFFERENT. County /"~ (:' { ~ (Area Code) Telephone Number - ~-~:~ i \,C" t.o" ! '- c~: ; '_ ~' '(b) TO BE COMPLETED BY DESTINATION SITE Date Tires Received (Month/Day/Year) Are the number of tires received the same as the number of tires shipped in Part I? [] Yes [] No If NO, please complete the box(es) below: Whole Tires in this Shipment OR-* Volume of tires in this Shipment Weight of tires in this Shipment (cubic yds ) , OR-* (Circle one) pounds tons I certify that the information provided above is true and correct and that I have been authorized by the State of California or a local agency permit to accept waste tires for reuse or disposal. I am aware that falsification of this manifest may result in civil penalties or administrative civil penalties as described in Public Resources Code Section 42962 (a) and (b). (See reverse side of this form) Waste Tire Destination Representative Signature Date Printed Name Pin.__~k - Tire Dealer/Waste Tire Generator/ Ye/Iow- Processor/Collection Center/Destination Site; White(original) - Waste Tire Hauler; Blue - Tire Dealer/Tire Generator if requested. A copy of each transact/on must be retained by each party for a per/od of three years. ......... NOi~H*AZARDO[JS WASTE MANIFEST / BiEE'OFEA:DING # GENERATOR ~D ND (optior~l) ~'~'":*- SHIP TO ~D NO (optional) ,, ,.z-.,-.~,,. Designated Facility ~.~:~;~.,..'~:~'o ,*~¥.'-.~1~;'~*~ .... Shipper Name '::'?"'" ..!,z,';~q~_~:': ~"*'- '* Address Address "" ...... "** ~ "* ~ ..... ~'~ :;: o~ '~ C'~ ' Contact Phooe - - Contact ':;i?v, ..t.. r,.-.~ . ..... o.~,.; *:.._ Phone /? ': ~/~ ~.~_.~U~'_ .-,~t-~ ~'__ I Container Ouantity Unit Description of Material: t-':'~-- ~/' _ # Size Type ~:*':-*~ .... '"'~-~'~ 2 / ~.,r- .. 3 Generator's Certification: :"~'*~>'";'~; ~' I hereby certify that the contents of this shipment are non-regulated waste as defined by 40 CFR Part 261, Part 761, or any applicable state law. This is to certify that the above named materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transportation according to applicable regulations of the Department~of~,ransportation. : ~" + ~-'"'. Date .- - ' ,'" Name '" .- Sighature ,-., ....... . ...... _, -- ? -, .- ,., /..,,.,"" ~, ,~ ..-. .~_ ::~,/ ;'.._.. _~ TRANSPORTER #i .' '- .............. -'*; ..... ~'-,:. Telephone ,-. ...... ~*- ..... ~--.-- ID NO (optional) *':~ :: ~:'~ -';::i ,"*~ ~ .'.'~; "'-': ':-" :"'~ t:~ Vehicle/State ID No. I hereby acknowledge that the above named material was picked up at the generator site listed above. '- Name -~? :~/ .,z.'. ..::. ,..--' : : ) T" ! / ,'_-'-z:' ..~,'" i .. _..:,,:'~ "2'., , .... ., ,.." .: / ., ., ,?-~: ,.-'~. Signature .' -~ , ...... ,-.: .... Date ,/~-"' TRANSPORTER #2 Transporter Name Telephone ID NO (optional) Vehicle/State ID No. i hereby acknowledge that the above named material was picked up from the transporter listed above. - ~arne _ Signature Date RECEIVING FACILITY "! hereby acknowledge that the above named material has been delivered, and to the best of my knowledge, the foregoing is true and accurate. ,me Signature Dat~ ::.::.!::::.. ?pancies: :...'"::::.:~ ",~White- Odoinal Green - Receiving FacilityCanar~ -- Trans. #2 Pink -- Trans. #1 Goldenrod-- Generator Copy State of CaliFornia--Environmental Protection Agency ' ' " , Form Ap~:~zoved OMB No. 2050-0039 (Expires 9-30-99) , i. See Instrbctions on back of pa! Department oF Toxic Substances Control. ~'~ P~e~ase print or type. Eorm d~.slgned for use on elite (!2-pitchJ : .~ Sacramento, California i, UNIFORM HAz.~RDous · 1. Gen~lor'~ US EPAID No. . Manifest D ...... t No. 2. Page I InFormation in the shaded areas "J ~ ?~/ ~(~,~,1~ ~= "~- Fl ~ J~. ~' ~ of ~ is not required by Federal law.' WA.~TE MANIFEST 16. GENE~OR'S cERTmnCAt~ON: m hereby declare that the contents oF this consignmen* are Fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name ~fid are cl~ssifi~ packed, mar~ed, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition ~or transportby highway according to applicable intem.ational and national government regulations. If I am a ~arge quanfi~ generator, I certi~ that ~ have a program in place to reduce t~e volume and toxici~ of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that Ihave selected the practicable method o~ treotment, sforage, or disposal currently available .to me which minimizes the present and Future threat to ~uman health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quanti~ generator, ~ have made a good faith effort to minimize my wast~ generation and select the best waste management method that is .. available t ..... d that'~ .... fiord. ~ ~ I ' ' ' ' Printed/Typ~me ) ~'~ ~" I Signature ] ~ //1 ~' '1 Month Day Year ~ ]7. Transporter 1 Acknowled~ .... t of Receipt~f Materials Pr nted/Typed Name . i , ' Signa ure //_ /~/ ~ // ' [ Month Day Year ~ 1 ~. T~ansporter~ AcknOwledgement of Receipt o~ Materials [ ~ Printed/Typed Name { Signa~e ~ Month Day Year I I 20. Facili~ Owner Or Operator CertiFication o~ receipt oF hazardou~ materiaJs covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. T Printed/Typed Name ' . . ~ Signature . Month Day Year , ~ .. ~ · " ..' . ' ,: DO NOT WRITE BELO~ THIS LINE. : :~ ' · DTsC' 8022A (4/97} " G~een: TRANSPORTER RETAINS ' ' ~A ~700--~ .. PJ.ease print or type. (Form designed for use one) typewriter,) Form Approved. OMB No. 2050-0039. Expires 9-30-94 · ' ~' UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 21. Generai1~"'s US EPA ID No.' Manifest Document No. ~ Information in the shaded ~3. Generators Name ' L State, Manifest DoCument Number 24. Transpo~er ~* Company Name ,~ / 25. US EPA ID Number N. State Transpo~efs ID ' ~ ~ ~ O. Transpo~e¢s Pho~ 26. Transpoder Company Name 27. US EPA ID Number P. State Transpo~e~s ID'  Q. Transpode~s Phone 28. US DOT Description (Inc/uding Proper Shipping Name, Hazard C/ass, and ID Number) Total Unit ~ ' 'Waste No; NM NO. Type Quantity . I i~.,~. / , ~.. :... .-:. . · .. 8.~Additibh~lDescripfi0n's f0r M~etialsLisiedAb~ve '~.: ': t,:j~ ;'~ ~ ~t:: ~;;~t:~ ~ ~ Handlin~:C0des~vwaStes Listed Abbve 32. Special Handli~p Instructions and Additional Information ~ :'?" ~/~5 Z/:-I~ ' ~&~ ~,~ · 33. Transpo~er __ Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date ~ Printed~yped Name ~Signature Month Oay Year N ~ ~4. Transpo~er ~ Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date ET Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year ~ 35. Discrepancylndication Space Style F16 REV-6 ~ELMASTER, An AM6RICAN ~BELMARK CO., CHICAGO, IL 60646 800-621-5808 EPA Form 8700-22A (Rev. 9-~8) Previous editions are obsolete. KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, L~LP Anthony J. Klein LAWYERS T. Scott Belden Thomas V. DeNatale, Jr. Catherine E. Bennett Barry L. Goldner · 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE David D. Blaine J. L. Rosenlieb SECOND FLOOR Nancy L. Oehler David J. Cooper BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Timothy G. Scanlon Claude P. Kimball Andrea Selvidge William A. Bruce MAILING ADDRESS: Leonard K. Welsh P.O. BOX 11172 Christopher P. Burger BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389-1172 Ned E. Dunphy (661) 395-1000 Mel Ehrlich FAX (661) 326-0418 OF COUNSEL / - v ~O.~,.¥ ! Bruce F. Bunker KrystynaKevin C.L.FindleYJamieson E-MAIL kleinlaw@kleinlaw.com ]J~¥'? //'homas C.. Fallgatter Barry E. Rosenberg ~/ Craig D. Braun April 16, 1999 Mr. Ralph Huey Director of Environmental Services Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Holden's Truck Plaza Buck Owens Boulevard, Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Huey: This follows your telephone call-concerning a timetable for implementation of the temporary closure plan at the above facility. San Joaquin Bank proposes to implement the temporary closure plan as specified in previous correspondence to you within thirty (30) days of the above date and complete implementation of the plan within thirty (30) days thereafter. San Joaquin Bank will provide 48 hours' notice to your Department before commencing on-site work. I trust you will find the above time schedule acceptable. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Ve~y~ruly yours, ~ CpB jm cc: Mr. John.w. IVy D October 27. 1998 Christopher Burger Klein, DeNatale, Goldner P.O. Box 11172 Bakersfield, CA 93389-I 172 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE RE: Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Pierce Road in Bakersfield ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Dear Mr. Burger: Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 In response to your letter dated October 21, 1998, I would like to clarify several points brought up in your correspondence. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street I, The permit to operate thc above mentioned facility was revoked on Bakersfield, CA 93301 November 18, 199?. VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 2. No temporary closure was applied for through this office. 1 refer you to PREVENTION SERVICES Section 2671 CCR Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Underground Storage 1715 Chester Ave. Tank Regulation as a reference. This office has no idea as to what the status Bakersfield, CA 93301 of the tanks are at 3775 Pierce Road, and has not been able to determine if VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 temporary protocols have been exercised. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 3. Since no notification was sent to this office regarding temporary closure, or 1715 Chester Ave. any other notification, other than bankruptcy notice to our Finance Bakersfield, CA 93301 Department, this office deems these tanks illegally abandoned, and such falls VOICE (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326.-0576 under the Uniform Fire Code Section ?902.1.7.1, 7902. 1.7.2.2 and 7902.1.7.2.3. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Arrangements have been made for a thorough inspection 0fthe above mentioned Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 facility for Monday, November 2, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. This office thanks you for your help in FAX (805) 399-5763 facilitating this inspection. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 326-3979. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey, Director Of'rice of Environmental Services Steve Underwood, Inspector ~ Office of Environmental Services" SBU/dm enclosures cc: John Ivy Walt Porr D October 28, 1998 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE John Ivy ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES San Joaquin Bank 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 4600 California Avenue vOiCE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-~349 Bakersfield, CA 93309 SUPPRESSION SERVICES RE: Re-Sending Of Notice of Violation & Schedule for Compliance at 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 3775 Pierce Road, Holden Truck Plaza VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Dear Mr. Ivy: PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 It has come to our attention, that San Joaquin Bank is not the VOICE (805) 326-3951 VAX (805) 326-0576 property owner of the above mentioned property, but merely the mortgage holder. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 This office apologies for the error, and will pursue action with Mr. VOICE (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 Jimerson. TUN'NO OMS~O. Sincerely, 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 voice (805) 399-4897 FAX (805)399-5763 Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Services by: ~,~ ~ Steve Underwood Underground Storage Tank InspeCtor Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm cc: Chris Burger Walt Porr L D October 16, 1998 Christopher P. Burger Klein, DeNatale, Goldner FIRE CHIEF P.O. Box 11172 RO~ FRAZE Bakersfield, CA 9338-1172 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RE: Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Pierce Road in Bakersfield 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 Dear Mr. Burger: FAX (805) 395-1349 Per your request, ! am enclosing current regulatory requirements from both California Code of SUPPRESSION SERVICES Regulations and the Uniform Fire Code. 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 AS we discussed on thc phone yesterday, this office is also subject to the Uniform Fire Code, VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395`1349 not withstanding temporary closure requirement for CCR Section 26?0. The above mentioned site, from this office's view, has been illegally abandoned for almost 2 PREVENTION SERVICES years. I have included copies of the fire code for your reference. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3951 This office has adopted the policy that all tanks, which have not been upgraded, replaced, or FAX (805) 326-0576 removed by December 22, 1998, will have 90 days to meet regulatory compliance. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES After which time, we refer to the Uniform Fire Code Sections 7902.1.7.1, 7902.1.7.2.2 & 1715 Chester Ave. 7902. 1.7.2.3. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 This office will grant temporary closure beyond the 90 days, for the following criteria. TRAINING DIVISION 1. Our office has an approved permit. 5642 Victor Ave. 2. Signed contract with contractor specifying when he wilt perform work. Bakersfield. CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 FAX (805) 399-5763 [ hope this is helpful to you and your client, Should you have further questions, please do not · hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Ralph E. ttuey, Director Office of Environmental Services Steve Underwood, Inspector Office of Environmental Services SBU/dm cc: John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank enclosures //EPA IIJL ·' ,,,,,, w,,,,,,, StateWater I,By .__ I oo,~,-,,o, Resources Control Board UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM Division of LOCAL GUIDANCE (LG) LETTER Clean Water Programs To: Local Implementing Agencies Mailing Address: P.O. Box944212 LG 149 TANK CLOSURE AFTER TI-IE 1998 UPGRADE DEADLINE Sacramento. CA 94244.2120 As the deadline for 1998 upgrade draws near, equipment and service supply may not be 2014 T ~ able to meet upgrade and closure demand. Local agencies can use Article 7 of the Suite 130 s~,-~-~-~. CA underground storage tank 0JST) regulations to help tank owners ease possible scheduling 95814 (9~6) 227.4483 conflicts due to materials and contractor limited availability. FAX (916) 227-4349 Owners or operators who plan to temporarily close or permanently close their tanks will be compliant with the regulations if the tank is emptied before the December 22, 1998 deadline. The owner or operator may be allowed to complete the rest of the closure · requirements (temporary or permanent) within a reasonable time oeriod_following the deadline as determined b t,y.,~local a~ency. In Subsections 2670(c) & (e), once closure has started and after storage cessation, where the tank is empty, ~ may give an ~ owner and/or operator a r_.e. ason__ab__ie am.opnt of time to finish closing the UST. When temporary closure is started and the tank emptied, Section 2671 describes additional measures necessary to remain in compliance. Temporary closure beyond twelve months requires agency approval in accordance with Article 6. During the temporary closure process, the agency shall require an investigation to determine if a release has occurred and the agency shall require certification that the tank shell will provide structural support. The tank must meet the upgrade requirements before it can be put back into service. When permanent closure is implemented, the tank must be emptied before the December 1998 deadline, even though closure will not be completed by that time. Agencies may require the tank rendered inert to non-explosive vapor levels as often as necessary for safety. One method to meet this requirement may be to fill the UST(s) with a noncorrosive and nonhazardous liquid as approved by the local agency. Except for required venting, ali fill ports and access locations and piping shall be sealed. Power service for the system shall be disconnected. Also, the owner or operator must inspect the UST at least once every three months to ensure the above measures remain intact. Section 2671 may be used as a guide to help agencies determine if any additional requirements should be met. O'Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources, and ensure their proln~r allocation and e~lclent use,for the benefit of present and.future generations. 1994 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 7902.1.3.2-7902.1.7.2.4 EXCEPTIONS: I. Tanks of 300 gallons ( I 135.5 L) capacity or less located on private property and used for heating and cooking fuels in single-family dwellings. 2. Tanks located underground. 7902.1.4 Sources of ignition. Smoking and open flames are prohibited in storage areas. See also Section 7901.10. 7902.1.5 Explosion control. Explosion control, equivalent protection devices or suppression systems, or a barricade shall be provided in accordance with the Building Code when Class I liquids are stored inside buildings in excess of the exempt amounts, or where explosive vapor-air mixtures could develop under normal operating conditions. EXCEPTION: Class I-B and I-C liquids when provided with continuous ventilation at the rate set forth in Section 8003.1.8. See also Sections 7902.5. II.7, 7902.5.12.7, 7903.2.3.4.3 and 7903.2.3.5.3. 7902.1.6 Separation from incompatible materials and accumulation of combustibles. Stor- age of flammable and combustible liquids shall be separated from incompatible hazardous materi- als in accordance with Section 8001.9.8. Grass; weeds; combustible materials; and waste Class I, II and III-A liquids shall not be accumu- lated in an unsafe manner at a storage site. 7902.1.7 Abandonment and status of tanks. 7902.1.7.1 General. Tanks taken out of service as a result of a property's being abandoned or its use being changed shall be removed or abandoned in place in accordance with Section 7902.1.7.2.3 or 7902.1.7.3.3. The time schedules stipulated shall not apply. In other cases, tanks taken out of service shall be safeguarded or removed in accordance with ,". Section 7902.1.7. 7902.1.7.2 Underground tanks. 7902.1.7.2.1 Temporarily out of service. Underground tanks temporarily out of service shall have the fill line, gage opening, vapor return and pump connection secure against tampering. Vent lines shall remain open and be maintained in accordance with Sections 7902.1.10 and 7902.2.6. · --~2 7902.1.7.2.2 Out of service 90 days. Underground tanks not used for a period of 90 days shall be safeguarded in accordance with the following or rem..._o, ved_in accordaqc~_wjth Section 7902.~ ,1.7.4:,.. 1. Flammable or combustible liquids shall be removed from the tank, .. 2. All piping, including fill line, gage opening, vapor return and pump connection, shall be capped or plugged and secured from tampering, and 3. Vent lines shall remain open and be maintained in accordance with Sections 7902.1.10 and · 7902.2.6. "--"~ 7902.1.7.2.3 Underground tanks out of service for one year. Underground tanks which have been out of service for a period of one year shall be removed from the ground in accordance with Section 7902.1.7.4 and the site shall be restored in an approved manner. When the chief determines that the removal of the tank is not necessary, abandonment in place is allowed. 7902.1.7.2.4 Tanks abandoned in place. Tanks abandoned in place shall be abandoned as fol- lows: 1. Flammable and combustible liquids shall be removed from the tank and connected piping, 2. The suction, inlet, gage, vapor return and vapor lines shall be disconnected, 3. The tank shall be filled completely with an inert solid material approved by the chief, 4. Remaining underground piping shall be capped or plugged, and 5. A record of tank size, location and date of abandonment'shall be retained. 1-245 CCR. TITLE 25, DIv1SION 5, CIIAPTER 16, U,'qDERGROL,'ND STORAGE T.M~IK REGL'I~TIONS t'ndcrground storage tanks that have had an unauthorized release do not qualify for temporao' closure pursuant to section 2671 until the owner or .operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the local agency that appropriate authorized repairs have been made which make the underground storage tank capable of storing hazardous substances in accordance with the permit issued by the local agency. (h) Underground storage tanks that have emitted an unauthorized release and that cannot be repaired by authorized methods shall be permanently closed pursuant to requirements of section 2672. (i) Decommissioned tanks and underground storage tan~' permanently closed on- site by cleaning and filling with an inert solid prior to January 1, 1984 need not comply with the closure requirements in this section unless required by the local agency. However, hazardous substances released from such tanks before or after the closure, shall be reported by the owner pursuant to Article 5 and shall be cleaned up pursuant to section 13304 of the Water Code, Article 11 of these regulations, and any other applicable law or regulations. 0) A regulated tank shall be subject to the requirements of subsections (d) and (e) of section 2672 before the local agency may grant exempt status to the tank. ^uthorirv: Health and Safety. 25299.3, 25299.7 Reference: Health and SafeD' 25298; 40 CFR 280.70, 280.71; 280.73, and 280.74 2671. Temporary Closure Requirements (a) An owner or operator shall comply with all of the following requirements to complete and maintain temporary closure of an underground storage tank: (!) All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed and handled in accordance with the applicable provisions of in accordance with Chapters 6.5 and 6.7 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) If the underground storage tank contained a hazardous substance that could produce flammable vapors at standard temperature and pressure, it shall be inerted, as often as necessary, to levels that will preclude an explosion or to lower levels as required by the local agenc).-. (3) The underground storage tank may be filled with a noncorrosive liquid that is not a hazardous substance. This liquid.shall be tested and the test results submitted to the local agency prior to removal from the underground storage tank at the end of the temporary closure period. (4) Except for required venting, all fill and access locations and piping shall be 7.2 (:CR. 'l'rrLF. 23, D~v~s~oN 5, C~^P'rE~ 16, U~n~.RC, ROUND STORAGE T^NK REG~LWr~oN.s sealed using locking caps or concrete plugs. (5) Power service shall be disconnected from all pumps associated with the use of the underground storage tank unless the power services some other equipment which is not being closed, such as the impressed-current cathodic protection system. (b) The monitoring required pursuant to the permit may be modified by the local agency during the temporary closure period. In making a decision to modify. monitoring requirements, the local agency shall consider the need to maintain monitoring in order to detect unauthorized releases that may have occurred during the time the underground storage tank was used but that have not yet been detected. In all cases, corrosion protection shall continue to be operated. (c) The underground storage tank shall be inspected by the owner or operator at least once every, three months to verify that the temporary closure measures are still in place. The inspection shall include but is not limited to the following: (1) Visual inspection of all locked caps and concrete plugs. (2) If locking caps are used, at least one shall be removed to determine if any liquids or other substances have been added to the underground storage tank or if there has been a change in the quanti~- or ~'pe of liquid added pursuant to subsection (a)(3) of this section. (d) At the end of a temporary closure period over 12 months, including any extension granted by the local agency, the owner ma)' reuse the underground storage tank only if the tank meets the requirements of Article 3 for new underground storage tanks or is upgraded to meet the requirements of Article 6. (e) All new and existing underground storage tank systems which have been temporarily closed must continue to comply with repair and recordkeeping requirements, release reporting and investigation requirements, and release response and corrective action requirements specified in this chapter and Chapter 6.7 of the Health and S~'ety Code. Authority: Health and Safety. Code 25299.3, 25299.7 Reference: Health and Safety Code 25298; 40 CFR 280.70. 281.36(a)(1) 2672. Pei-nianent Closure Requirements (a) Owners or operators of underground storage tanks subject to permanent closure shall comply with either subsection (b) for Underground storage tank 7-3 10/16/98 09:02 '~805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~00! *** ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 8882 CONNECTION TEL 3260418 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/16 08:58 USAGE TIME 03'45 PAGES 5 RESULT OK L D October 12, 1998 FIRE CHIEF John Ivy RON FRAZE San Joaquin Bank ~U~N~S~VE SERVICES 4600 California Avenue 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 93309 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 RE: Holden Truck Center 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield Ca. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield,CA 93301 NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND SCHEDULE VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805)395-1349 FOR COMPLIANCE PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Dear Mr. Ivy: Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 It has come to our attention, that San Joaquin Bank currently owns ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES property located at 3775 Pierce Road (Holden Truck Center) in 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, which contains at least two (2) underground storage tanks. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 The tanks have not been properly permitted, and have been out of service, FAX (805)326-0576 therefore, San Joaquin Bank is in violation of the following sections of the TRAINING DIVISION Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the Bakersfield Municipal Code, 5642 Victor Ave. Chapter 15.64. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 FAX (805) 399-5763 Section 7902.1.7.2.3 Uniform Fire Code (1994 Edition) "Underground tanks whichhave been out of service for a period of one (1) year, shall be removed from the ground in accordance with Section 7902.1.7.4 and the site shall be restored in an approved manner. The specific remedial action necessary to return the property to compliance are as follows: 1. The underground storage tanks must be upgraded, replaced or removed by December 22, 1998, per federal law. 2. The tanks must be properly permitted. 3. Pay all current and past due City of Bakersfield Underground Storage Tank fees, and California State Surcharge. The purpose of this letter is to impress upon you the need to take immediate action. With that goal in mind, I urge you to return the 'property to compliance through cooperation with the Office of Environmental Services. I must inform you, that failure to correct these violations before November 10, 1998, may necessitate legal action, including, but not limited to, misdemeanor citation and/or injunctive relief. I thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation and, should you have any questions concerning the necessary action or require further information, please contact Steve Underwood directly at 805-326- 3979. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Services by: Steve Underwood - - Underground Storage Inspector Office of Environmental Services cc: Walt Porr, Assistant City Attorney NOV051997 WILLIAM E. KRUSE, No. 166067 I PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a copy of the Debtor's moving papers filed in support of Law Offices of Kruse & Asociates 2 an order converted the case to one under Chapter 7 will be provided upon request by telephone 2083 Vista Mar Drive El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 929-8622 3 call to the Law Offices of Kruse & Associates at (916)929-8622, or by te!ecopier to (916) 933-5675 4 (916)933-5675, or send your request to the address named in the upper le.r! hand corner of this Attorney for Debtor CHARLES H. JIMERSON ' S notice. ..~ .. 6 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that responses or objections to lite Debtor's 7 election for conversion of case to one under Cl~apter 7 of the Bankruptcy Coc]~e, if any, must be UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 8 made pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules; and shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the FOR THE EASTERN'DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Bankruptcy Court at 1130 "O" Street Roora 2656, Fresno, CA 93721, and served upon the FRESNO DIVISION 10 Debtor's attorney, William E. Krnse, at the address named in the upper lea hand comer of this 1 ! notice, and served upon the Office of the United States Trnste~e at ! 130 "0" S!reet Room 1110, [n re: Case No. 94-11778-A- 11K 12 Fresno, CA 93721. Any objection to the Debtor's motion must be filed and served not less than Chapter ! I 13 five (5) court days preceding the above-captioned noticed date of hearing Failure to file an CHARLES H. HMERSON MCN: WEK-I 14 objection or response may be deemed a waiver thereof and deemed to be co~,~sent to the relief I~'¥~ NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEBTOR'S 15 requested without further hearing or notice. Ii.__ Debtor. ELECTION FOR CONVERSION OF lll CASE TO A CASE UNDER 16 DATE: October-""2 ',<,, 1997 LAW OFFICES OF KRUSE & ASSOCIATES CHAPTER 7 --- DATE: Novetnber 20, 1997 17 ~~--~.~.~'"'~// TIME: 9:00 a.m. 18 ~'] A ~ .~. ~ ~"~E ,-'~'~,- ~-~r- ............. PLACE: FederalU'S' BankruptCYBuilding Court 19 Charles H. Jinlerson, Debt% 800 Trnxtun Ave. Room 204 Bakersfield, CA 93301 20 I TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD T. FORD, THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 22 TRUSTEE, CREDITORS, AND INTERESTED PARTIES: 23 24 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Debtor, CHARLES H. JIMERSON, through his 25 attorney William E. Kmse with Kmse & Associates has filed a Debtor's election for conversion 26 of case to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankrnplcy Code pttrsvant to 11 U.S.C. section 1112(a} 27 ill which the Debtor requests the entry of an order couvening case to one under Chapter 7. 28 NOTICE OF ItEARING ON DEBTOR'S ELECTION FOR CONVERSION OF CASE // TO A CASE UNDER CIIAPTER 7 UNDERGROUND STORAGE, SPECTION ...... !i .Bakersfield Fire Dept. i,li Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME 'lc~;)~,~ "-'~t,r'~L. ~o~,,'-~--~P_.__ BUSINESS I.D. No. 215-000 FACILI~ PHONE No. INSPECTION DATE P~ P~u~ TIME IN, TIME OUT in~le INSPECTION ~PE: ~~' E~ ROUTINE ~ FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS lb. F~ C Su~ I I V~ ~ - ld. S~te SumMr~ Pa~ le. Stat~t of F~IN R~l~l~ Su~ lf. W~en Cont~ E~s ~n ~r & O~ to O~e UST ~. ~lid O~mti~ Pete ~. Appmv~ W~en R~ine M~ng Pr~ure ~. U~~ Rel~ R~n~ Plan ~. Tank Int~ T~ in ~ 12 M~ths 3b. Pm~u~ Pipi~ Int~r~ Test in ~st 12 ~nths ~. Suctl~ Piping ~ghtn~s T~ in La~ 3 Y~m ~. Gmv~ F~ Piping ~ght~ T~ in ~st 2 Y~m ~. T~t R~u~s Subm~ Within ~ Da~ 3f. Dal~ ~sual Mon~ng of S~ Pr~ Piping ~. Manual Invento~ R~il~t~ E~h ~th ~. Annual Invento~ R~illat~ Statement Su~ ~. Metem Calibmt~ Annually 5. W~kly Manual Tank Gauging R~ds f~ Small Tan~ 6. Month~ S~tisti~l Invento~ R~cll~tlon R~u~ 7. M~h~ A~ic Tank Gaugi~ R~u~s 8. Gr~nd Water ~nE~ng 9. ~ MonEodng 10. C~tinuous IntemtEial MonEoH~ f~ ~ubl~Wall~ Tan~. 11. M~hani~l Line L~k. Det~ 12. El~ronic Line Leak Da~om 13. C~tln~us Piping ~nEod~ In Sum~ 14. A~at~ Pump Shrift Ca~bil~ 15. Annual Malntenan~Calibmtlon of L~k ~im Equl~nt 16. Leak Det~tl~ Equipment and T~t Me~s LI~ In L~113 Se~ 17. W~en R~ds Main~in~ on SEe 18. Re~ C~ng~ in U~g~CondEions to O~tin~nEod~ Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem W~hin ~ Da~ 19. Re~ Una~h~ Relea~ WEhin 24 Houm ~. Approv~ UST S~tem Re.irs a~ U~md~ 21. R~rds Sh~ng Cath~ Prot~i~ Ins~ ~. ~u~ MonE~ng Wells ~ RE-INSPECTION DATE BY: UNDERGROUND TANK MONITORING PLAN FOR HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA Submitted November 26, 1991 The following is a description of our self monitoring and inspection processes we have performed since the construction of our underground tank storage in 1985. Our procedures meet or exceed the manufacturers recommended maintenance schedule. 1. Frequency of monitoring A. Pumps, hoses, filter and dispensers. * 3 times a day. Once each shift. We are a full service 24 hour a day operation. We never close. Any maintenance item must be reported and corrected immediately. B. Secondary tank containment is monitored by "PolyAlert" Tank Probes within the secondary tank area of the underground fuel storage. Quarterly a visual inspection is performed by removing each of the four tank probes and inserting a clean white towel to the bottom most part of the secondary tank containment space. Any condensation is removed and the probes are re-installed and tested for proper electrical operation. C. Underground pipe secondary containment pit boxes are visual inspected weekly. Enclosed is a copy of a filled out form for this procedure. D. Fill boxes are inspected weekly in conjunction with the weekly monitoring of the pit boxes. F. Bi-Annual all dispenser cabinets, check valves, and piping leak detectors are checked for leakage and function. 2. Individuals responsible for maintaining the fuel facility are: A. Shop Manager - Responsible for weekly pit inspections, fill boxes and maintenance items within his area of expertise. B. Clark's Petroleum Equipment Repair - Responsible for Bi-Annual inspections of dispenser calibration, equipment repair, fuel strainer cleaning, and dispenser cabinet inspections. C. Owner - Ultimately responsible for maintaining a safe and leak free fuel dispensing operation. Page 1 3. Training required A. Island attendants are trained in the following areas. 1. Tank sticking procedures. 2. Fill box inspection. 3. Dispenser, hose, and nozzle inspection. 4. Prevention of the spill before it occurs. B. Shop manager is trained in the following areas. 1. Fuel hose break away repair or replacement. 2. Fuel hose and nozzle repair and/or replacement. 3. Secondary containment visual pit inspection and reporting requirement. 4. Fuel filter replacement and disposal. C. A qualified service company. (Danny Clark - Clark's Equipment) 1. To perform any operation out of our area of expertise. 2. Annual dispenser cabinet inspection, connections, and calibration. D. Office manager is trained and responsible in the following areas. 1. Fuel inventory monitoring and reconciliation. 2. Maintaining adequate records for self inspection processes. Page 2 Fill one segment o_ut for each tank, unless al~tanks and piping are constructed of ~ same materials, style anOype, then only fill one segment out. please identify tanks by owner ID #. I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY; IF UNKNOWN c. DATE INSTALLED (MO,DAY/YEAR) ~0 /~ /~5--- O. TANK CAPAC'W IN GALLONS: (~))0 ,000 (~ ~ C~I III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ~TEM ONLY IN BOXES A. B. ANOC, ANOALLTHATAPPL~ESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [;~ 100UBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER 1' BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS ,~4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC B. TANK MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATISLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] , RUBSER LI.ED [] 2 AL~D L,.ING [] -~ EPOX~ L,.ING [] , PHENOL~ LI.,NG C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING [~6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING ' ; [] 3 VINYL wRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN .. [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFASOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A IJ 1 SUCTION ~13Rr:-~'~HRE-~'~ A ~ 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL .~-I}-~'-.D~UBLE ~ A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC~4~FIBERG~'P~ CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COAT~NG A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHOD1CPROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING ~'3 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] 1 v,suAL CHECK I~"~ ,NVENTORY .ECONC,L,AT,ON []~ VA"O. ~ON,TOR,NG [] ~ ~TOMAT,C TANK GAUG,NG [] ~ GROUND WATER MON,TOR,NG [] ~ TANK TEST,NC [] ~ ,N~RST,T,ALMON,TOR,NG [] ~, .ONE [] ~ UNKNOWN ~;~ ~ OTHER I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECI~ IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. ~ 8. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE iNSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY iN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES k S. ANOC, AND ALL THAT APPLIES ~N BOX D A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WA~-L [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] g9 OTHER B. TANK [] ~1 BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] , .UssER LINED [] 2 AL~D LIN,NG [] ~ EPO~ LIN,N~ [] ~ PHENOL~ LINING C. )NTERIOR [] s GLASS LINING [] 0 UNLINED [] ~5 UNKNOWN [] ~ OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION .E~ 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM' A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL Wl COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATiBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE Tk~HTNESS TESTING [] 3 iNTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ~ ._ 1 VISUAL CHECK [~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION ~ 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING , ~, ~ ~AN~ T~,~G [~ ~ ,NTERST,t,ALMON,TOR'NG [] ~, NONE m--1 ~ UNKNOWN [] ~ O~,~R TANK ~ ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES 1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted ~ouble-Wall I-]single-Wall 2. Ta~ Mate[ial  rbon Steel i-]Stainless Steel [-][~)lyvinyl Chloride ~Fiberglass-Clad Steel iberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Alu~in~ [] Bronze ['1Unknown ther (describe) 3. Primary Containment E~te I nstall~c]- ~ickness (Inches) Ca pa~c~ty (Gallons) ,~a~ '.~ ' 4. Tank Secondar~ Containment ' -~-~p~uble-Wall DSynthetic Liner []Lined Vault []None []Unkno~ [-1Other (describe): Manufacturer: OMaterial Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior L~ I~Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion ~ .... -~Galvanized ~iberglass-Clad [-IPol~th¥1ene Wrap []Vinyl ['1Tar or A~hait [-]t~km0m~ [None ['1Other (describe)~ ' Cathodic ~rotection: [~None [lImp~emse~ Current System ~SacrtZl¢lal Descrlbe-Sys-tem & Equi[~ment: ....... 7. Leak Detection, M~nitori~, an~ In~ a; Tank~ ~lVis~'l (Vaulted' ~ only) nGround~ater Manitortr~' [-lVadose Zone M~nitori~ Well(s) [~U-Tube Without Liner ~lu-Tube with Ccm_patible Liner Directin~ Flow to Monitorl~ ~1 Va[~r D~t~ctor* [] Liquid Level Sensor [] Conductivit~ Sensor l~ Annular Space of Double Wall Tank- id htriev&l & Inspection From U-Tube,_.~nitorin9 Wall or Papular Space 1¥ ~Gat~lng & Inventory Reconciliation [~ertodic ?lghtne~ 1~in9 b. Pipt~_ ~.low-Restrictin~ Leak-Detector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pl~in~" ...... [_-l~itorl~ 81.1ap wtt~. Ra~'-mm¥ [-1Sea_led C.,~:ete Raee~¥ _ nHalf-Cut Olapati ,b~.. pips Race~ [q Synthetic Linar Rac:~B¥ O o,m •other' *Describe Makal & Hocle ' ' -' c~l ..... 8. ?ank Ha~ 'm~s-Tank Seen ?igh~ 'teated? ~i~]NO I"lUnkno~m Date og ~aat .?Lghtneas ~eat ~ Resulr. s of~ Teat Test ~ -~- --'--T~sting C~mpany ' 9. Tank Repa! ~ ~ Repalr~l? Iiyes Ef~ I'lUnkno~m Dete(s) oe Repaid(a) ~_.< ......... Describe Repairs , ~ ..... 10. Overfill Protection ' [~>perator PillS-, Cofltrols, & Visually Monitors I~vel ['1Taps Float Gau~e ~Pl~at Vent Valves []Auto Shut- Off Controll (l Capacitance Sensor ~ealed ~ill aox []None []tlaknom tber~ ' . List Nake & J~d~l [PO[ All,ye I~vices a. Underground Piping: Jli~Lges []NO l-ltln.k~o.~m Har. erta~,~~ ?ht~,ckness (inches) --~ Otamer. e~ ~'~ Hanu~act. ute~ ' 0 ~essure I-ISuct:Lon I"lGravity 'Rppr-~imate Length o~--- b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : I"iGalvanized l-IFtberg~aas-C~acl I'l~pressed OJl:'rent: i-lsecrLft¢La! Ar, ode Polyethylene Wrap. I-IE:lectrica! Zsclar,~c~ l-Ivinyl N~ap l-l?at o.~ Unkno~m l-lNone II~LOther (describe): ~,, . _: , . ¢. Underground Piping, Secencla~¥ ¢ontatment~ ' - ~ ther (describe): FOR EACH SECTT~, ~HEC~-ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES ~1. 1. Tank is: [~] Va,~l ted [--INon-Vaul ted ~ouble-Wal 1 [']Sir~le-Wal 1 2. ~ Material oF ~ Steel ['7Stainless Steel [']polyvin¥! Chloride ~Flb~l~cjlas$-Clad iberglass-Reinforced Plastic ~]Concrete [-] Al~uin~n ther (describe) 3. pr imar¥ Containment D~te Ins~al~'e~ ' (Inches) Capa. c~ty (Gallons) Conta irenent ot Uble-Wall [']S~nthetic Liner [']Lined Vault ~]None [~]tlnkn~et her (describe) '- Manufacturer{ [~Naterial ThiCkness (Inches) Capacity 5. Tank Interior L-~l'r~r-m] n Other (describe). , 6. Ta~k Co~rosio~ C~thodlc Protection. Ola~e [~mp~essed Current System ['lSacrl~icial ?. Leak Detection, No~l~orir~, ar~J Interceptio~  -~ ~l~ C~tible Liar Dir~ti~ Flo~ ~ ~ltori~ Va~[ ~t~tor' O~id ~el ~n~r* O C~tivity b. pl~l~. ~l~trictl~ ~ak ~t~or(s)' ~or 9. ~ Re~l{ ~(s) o[ ~lr(s) ~ .......... ~rl~ Re.irs ~ 10. ~erfill Pro~ctl~ - - ~rator ~ Cmtrols, i Vl~lly ~itors O~a~ Flint ~e ~l~t V~t Valv~ ~to S~t- Off 11.  l~yla~ W~ap. ~ll~tri~l I~la~ ~Vinyl ~ U~o~ ~ ~her (~ri~): ~ c. U~ergro~ Pipig, Sectary Contai~nt5 '  1~11 ~by'~etic ti~r ~st~. ~ne ~r (de~rl~): FOR"~'~.ACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRT~TE .BOX~'"- I. Tank is: r'lvaulted F1Non-Vaulted ~l~ouble-Wall 2. ~ Material oF arbon Steel [-]Stainless Steel I']Polyvinyl Chloride [~ibel:~jl&u-Cla~] iberglass-Reinforced Plastic ['] Concrete r~ Al~in~m ['~ BI:On~ ~]Unk~cmsl 4. Tank Secondary Containment ]~po~i-~i¢ ,.i.er [3,ined vauit El.one nOther (describe): Manufacturer: , rll~a ter iai Thic'Eness (Inches) 5. Tank Interior L'-L-I'~l--n!! LJOthe£ (dsscribe): 6. Tank Co~rosl'on P(o~ect1~ .... . ........... - ~~-~asa-Clad rnpoiy~chylene Wra~ EIvtn¥! ~al~tr~ rTTar o~ ~sphalt E]tmkn~n El.one []other Cdeecrtbe): '~ _ ,, ,. Cathodic Protection: I'iNone rlIlapre~ad Current Sy~tam r'l~ri~ielal ]~ ~" 7. Leak Detection, Nonttorin~, aha Intercsptior{ [~]~lose Zo~ Nonitoring iCell(s) ~U~u0e Without Linsr i'lu-Tube wit3~ Ccmpetible Liner Directing Flo~ to Honltorir~ [] Vapor Da[ector* [] Liquid Level Sensors [] Con~uctivit~ I'lprsssurs Sensor in Annular Spnc~ of Double i¢nll Tan~. ' .... ~,Llqui~ Rntri~w&l Ii. Inspection Frm U-Tube,~Noni[o~lng ~l ~r ~ Spn~ ' [~l~mttoztmj Sump wtth lt~ce~p~, ['lsenl~ Co~eret~ ~ " [i]ltnlf-Cut C~i~ti~ Pli~ Racily Ii]Synthetic Liner · n unano~ []a~l~r ^ Describe Nnka & ~ - 8. Tank Tightness ' · . ~ Tnis=~r~ ~een TtghCr~a Teated? ~No Data o~ Last .Ti9ht~ea~ ~esl: _,~ Results of Test Teat Name .. . ~ ' '~sttn9 C~mpany ............. .. Describe Repeirs ~ ........... · 10. Overfill ProtectiOn " ~ ~Opnra~ Controls, & Visually Monitors Level DTepe Flon[ Gnugs .~lant vent valves r'l~uto Shut- Oil Controls I']Cn.pacitan~e Se~or ~lealed Fill Box nNone nun~no~ 11. [~[Pressure OSuc{f'on DGravity 'N:prox b. Underground Ptptng Corrosion Protectt~n -- _Galvantzed r'lFtberglass-Clad r'llmp~essed Current FISacri£tola! [__Jpolyethylene Wrap. I-]Electrical Isolat~qn [~Vinyl Wta~ c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment~ ' - ' · o D~tuble-~all [-Ib~....~chetic'L!.ner Syste~. L.~None ~:Jnkno~t her (describe): KERN COUNTY HEALTH.DEPARTMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT ~050037B UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS: Holdens Truck Center Chuck Jimerson 3775 Pierce Road 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 Bakersfield, CA 93308' NEW BUSINESS PERMIT EXPIRES August 2, 1986 CHANGE OWNERSH~ RENEWAL APPROVAL DATE .... ~qgust 2, 1985 MODIFICATICN OTHER APPROVED BY Joe Canas PosT'THIS PERMIT ON PREMISES CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Note: All pertinent equipment and materials used in this construction are subject to identification and approval by the Permitting Authority prior to construction. This permit is issued contingent upon guaranteed compliance with the guidelines as determined by the Permitting Authority. 2. All construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. 3. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with ~48 hours advance notice. 4. All underground metal product piping, fittings and connections must be wrapped to a minimum 20-mi! thickness with corrosion-preventive, gasoline-resistant tape or otherwise protected from corrosion. 5. Construction inspection record is included with permit given to Permittee. This card must be posted, at jobsite prior to initial inspection. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority and arrange for each group of required inspections numbered as per instructions on card. Generally, inspections will be made of: a. Tanks and backfill b. Piping system with secondary containment c. Overfill protection and leak detection/monitoring d. Any other inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority 6. Spark testing (35,000 volts) required at site prior to installation of tank(s). Test(s) must be certified by the manufacturer, and a copy of test certifications supplied to the Permitting Authority. 7. All equipment and materials-in this construction must be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. 8. No product shall be stored in tank(s) until approval is granted by Permitting Authority 9. Monitoring requirements for this facility will be described on final "Permit to Operate". EPTED BY DATE Yes No 6. Are Red Jacket subpumps and all line leak detector }~ {Z{ accessible? Type of line leak detector if any ~o~ ~c Y~ 7. Overfill containment box as specified on applicatlon? {~ {Z{ If "No", what type and model number: a) Is fill box tightly sealed around fill tube? }-_~ b) Is access over water tight? c) Is product present in fill box? 8. Identify type of monitoring: ~ a) Are manual monitoring instruments, product and water finding paste on premises? b) Is the fluid level in Owens-Corning liquid level monitoring reservoir and alarm panel in proper operating condition? c) Does the annular space or secondary containment liner leak detection system have self diagnostic capabilities? If "Yes", is it functional If "No", how is it tested for proper operating condition? 9. Notes on any abnormal conditions: STATE OF ~ALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL CENTRAL VALLEY REGION SAN JOAOU,N WATE.SHEO 6R^NCH OFF,CE: 3~,4~AST~,SHL,~NAW"UE .~'UG 0 9 1989 FRESNO. CALIFORNIA 93726 PHONE: (209) 445-5116 Environmental Health Div. Kern County Health Del)t. 8 August 1989 Mr. Chuck Jimerson C & D Truckwash ~ 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 SITE ASSESSMENT, C & D TRUCKWASH Enclosed for your information is a memo concerning our review of a site assessment report for the subject facility. The memo indicates that detection limits for soil samples collected and tested in accordance with EPA Methods 8020 and 8270 are higher than applicable water quality goals, by several orders of magnitude. Soil sample test results are therefore of little or no value in determining whether there is a potential for ground water pollution. You must collect ground water samples for testing in accordance with EPA 610, to determine whether ground water pollution has occurred beneath the site as a result of past on-site waste disposal practices. Prior to 25 August 1989, please submit a work plan and time schedule for ground water sampling and testing for PAH's. The work plan and time schedule must be prepared, under the direction of a California registered civil engineer, engineering geologist, or geologist. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Dale Essary at (209) 445-5145. LARRY W. BEATTY Senior Engineer Enclosure DEE:tis cc:.Department of Health Services, Sanitary Engineering Branch, Fresno Kern County Health Department, Bakersfield '. EXCLUSIV SALES LISTING AQ EEMENT Property: :3775 Buck Owens Blvd Date: October 19, 1999 1. In consideration of the listing for sale of the real property hereinafter described as ("the Property") by MOROAN CORPORATION hereinafter referred to as ("Broker"), and Broker's agreement to use its best efforts to effect a sale of same, Chuck Jimerson, hereinafter referred to as ("Owner") hereby grant(s) to Broker the exclusive right to sell the Property for a period commencing October 21, 1999 and ending midnight, ~ /~pril 20, ,,2t,O00 ("the Term"), at a price of Six Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ,~¢(. $675,000) upon terms acceptable to Owner. The Property is situated in the City of ~/'J" Bakersfield, the County of Kern, State of California, and is located at 3775 Buck Owens 2. Owner agrees to pay Brok~'~a sales c°mmission in accordance with Broker s Schedule of Sale and Lease Commissions ("the Schedule"), a copy of which is executed by Owner, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. This commission shall be earned and paid for services rendered if, during the Term: (a) A purchaser is procured (by Broker, Owner, or anyone else) who is ready, willing and able to purchase the Property at the price and on the terms above stated, or on any other price and terms agreeable by Owner; (b) Any contract for the sale of the Property is entered into by Owner; (c) Owner removes the Property from the market; or (d) Owner contributes or conveys the Property, or any interest therein, to a partnership, joint venture, or other business entity, or transfers an interest in an entity which has an ownership interest in the Property in lieu of a sale of the Property. 3. As used in this Agreement the term "sale" shall include an exchange of the Property, and also the granting of an option to purchase the Property. Owner agrees that in the event such an option is granted, Owner shall pay Broker a sales commission in accordance with the Schedule on the price paid for the option and for anv extensions thereof. This commission shall be paid upon receipt by Owner of any such payment(s). In the event such an option is exercised, whether during the Term or thereafter, Owner shall also pay Broker a sales commission on the gross sales price of the ProperLy in accordance with the Schedule. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that all or part of the price paid for the option or any extension thereof is applied to the sales price of the Property, then any commission previously paid by Owner to Broker on account of such option payments shall be credited against the commission payable to Broker on account of the exercise of the option. 4. Owner further agrees that Owner shall pay Broker the aforementioned commission if, within ninety (90) days after the expiration of the Term: (a) the Property is sold, (b) Owner enters into a contract for sale of the Property, or (c) negotiations commence and thereafter continue leading to the sale of the Property to any person or entity to whom Broker has submitted the Property prior to the expiration of the Term in an effort to effect a sale of the Property. Broker agrees to submit a list of such persons or entities to Owner no later than fifteen (15) days following the expiration of the Term, provided, however, if Broker has submitted a written offer then it shall not be necessary to include the offeror's name on the list. ~.EXCLUSIVE SALES LISTING REEMENT (continued) Property: 3735 Buck Owens Blvd ,/J be een Owner and the purchaser, the time limit for closing shall not exceed 90 days, ~' and anv offer may contain normal and customary contingencies such as purchaser's approval within 10 days of receipt thereof of title report, soils test and existing leases. 7. It is understood that it is illegal for either Owner or Broker to refuse to display or sell the Property to any person because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or physical disability. 8. owner agrees to cooperate with Broker in bringing about a sale of the Property and to immediately refer to Broker all inquiries of anyone interested in the Property. All negotiations are to be through Broker. Broker is authorized to accePt a deposit from any prospective purchaser. Broker is authorized to advertise the Property and to place a "FOr Sale" sign or signs on the Property if, in Broker's opinion, such would facilitate the sale of the Property. 9. Owner agrees to hold Broker harmless from all claims, disputes, litigation or judgments arising from any incorrect information supplied by Owner, or from any material fact known by Owner concerning the Property which Owner fails to disclose. Owner represents that it is the owner of the Property. 10. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Owner and Broker and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations and agreements, whether oral or written. No amendment, alteration or withdrawal of this Agreement shall be valid or binding unless made in writing and signed by both Owner and Broker. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assignees of the parties. 11. The term of this Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof as hereinabove first set forth and shall continue in full force and effect until April 20, 2000, or unless either party hereto has given written notice of said party's election not to renew this Agreement at least thirty (30) days prior to the conclusion of the term hereof or any renewal hereof, this Agreement shall automatically renew for an additional term on the same covenants and conditions as are herein contained. The undersigned Owner hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Agreement and the Schedule. AGREED AND ACCEPTED MORGAN CORPORATION ./ (805) 324-0398 FAX (805) 327-3403 C:~MYDOCU - 1 \W~FORM~LISTFRM\SALE LIST.WPD SCHEDULE SALE AND LEASE MMISSlON October 19, 1999 a. PROPERTY LOCATION. 5775 Buck Owens Rlvd, Bakersfield, California. b. SALES. As tO sales of improved real property, Broker's commission shall be six percent (6%)0f the gross sales price. As tO sales of unimproved real properly, Broker's commission shall be six percent (6%) of the gross sales price. This commission shall be paid at the close of escrow through escrow, or if there is no escrow, then upon recordation of the deed; provided, however, if the transaction involves an installment sales contract, then payment shall be made upon execution of such contract. In the event Owner contributes or conveys the property or anV interest therein to a joint venture, partnership, or other business entib/, or an interest in an entity which has no ownership interest in the property, or is transferred in lieu of a sale of the properly, the commission shall be calculated on the value of the properly, less the value of the interest in the property or entity retained bV or transferred to Owner, as the case may be, and shall be paid at the time of the contribution or transfer. Commission shall be earned and payable on execution of a lease by Owner and a ~ant, in acceptance with the following rates: five (5%) percent of the total rental f (5) years plus, ~wo and one half (21/2%) percent'of the total rental for the five (5) years plus, one and one fourth (1%%) percent of the total rental for. the of the term. The above rates are ct to the following provisions: 1. TERM OF MORE If a lease is in excess of 25 then the commission shall be calculated only upon the base rental to be paid for !rst 25 years of the lease term. 2. MONTH TO MONTH TENANCY. Any lease term less than two (2) years shall )nsidered month to month tenancy for purposes of commissions due. The ;hall be equal to the first month's base rental. 3. OPTION TO EXTEND/OCCUPYING ADDITIONAL SPACE. Should a lease term be extended or a tenant occupy additional sp~ by virtue of an option or other provision in its lease, or through subsequent modification of such provisions, then Owner shall pay a leasing commission in ac_cordanbe%with the provisions of this Schedule on the additional base rental to be paid, calculat~:l, at the commission rate applicable hereunder to the years of the lease in whic~..the C:\MYDOCU - I\WI~FORMS~LISTFRM\BUCKOWEN.WPD ... ~ .SCHEDULE OF SALE AND ;E COMMISSION _. (continued) Property: 3775 Buck Owens Blvd. ~hO,.u.!d a tenant, its successors o~ assignees, or any agent, officer, employee or share- hol~ of a tenant purchase the property pursuant to an option, right of first refusal, or 'ovisions during (a) the term of the lease (b) any extension thereof, or © within" nit days after the expiration thereof, then a sales commission shall be calculated and m accordance with the provisions of Section A above; provided however, that be a credit against such sales commission in the amount of lease commission [ paid to Broker relating to the portion of the purchaser's lease term which is reason of such sale. In no event shall such credit exceed the amount of the sale mission. 5. PERCENTAGE RENT. AS 'to any lease which contains a percenta nt clause: Owner shall pay a commission on the percentage rent payable by lant at the commission rate applicable to the period of the lease term for which th~ enrage rent is payable. This commission shall be payable within fifteen (15) days the tenant's final payment and accounting of percentage rent for the lg lease year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the end of the original term of th, For the purpose of calculating this commission, the percentage rent for each ~g year of the term of the lease shall be deemed to be the same amount as the ~ge The provisions hereof are subject to the terms and provisions of any Exclusive Sales Listing Agreement, Exclusive Leasing Listing Agreement, Exclusive Subleasing Listing Agreement or other agreements to which this Schedule may be attache~, and which is executed bv the parties hereto. In the event Owner fails to make payment to Morgan Corporation within thirty (30) days of invoice due date for said commission, then from the invoice due date until paid, the delinquent amount shall bear interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) per month (18%) annually). If Broker is required to institute legal action against Owner relating to this Schedule or any agreement of which it is a part, Broker shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Owner hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Schedule and agrees that it shall be bindinc~ upon its heirs, successOrs and asSignees. The term "Owner" as used herein shall be deemed to include the owner of the property, a tenant under a ground lease and a tenant of the property wishing to effect a sublease, lease assignment, or lease cancellation. The term "Tenant" as used herein shall be deemed to include any subtenant or assignee of the Owner, and the term "Lease" shall be deemed to include a sublease or lease assignment. AGREED AND ACCEPTED BROKER OWNER MORGAN ~:ORPORATION ~3a~0erCs~lief~:n~~l~uite 400 Address:: - ~ (805) 324-0398 FAX (805) 327-3403 C:~VlYDOCU' I\WP~FORMS%ISTFRM\BUCKOWEN.WPO corporation') Real Estate'- Brokerage /) November 23, 1999 To: John Ivy San JoaquinBank 5201 California Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93309 i ~ - ""~'~' -'~ ' ' - " · .~z~'~ ' ~'. Re: 3775 Buck 'Oweri~'Blvd.: Dear Mr. Ivy, ' ...... Attached is a list of companies and people that were sent our initial information mailers. Wes Wade, from Union Transportation, B.C. Ray owner of a tire company, and George Washington who owns a refrigeration company for commercial trucks have expressed an interest. We have met with Wes Wade & B.C. Ray and have discussed the property in length. We have had discussions with George Washington on the telephone, and are awaiting his response. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ;:.'.. Lance Skinner Leasing and Sales Director 5300 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, SUITE 400 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 (805) 324-0398 · FAX (805) 327-3403 A-1 Spring & Supply 1632 S. Union Ave Bakersfield, CA 93307 Aamco Transmissions 5333 White Lane Bakersfield, CA 93309 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 2415 CHESTER AVENUE~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ACE HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE INC. 2901 GIBSON STREET~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 ALL PHASE DIESEL 2433 FRUITVALE AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTE P.O. BOX 80057 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 BOB RICE DIESEL ELECTRIC 2717 HENRY LANE.~,'~D.~E~D:!: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BOB SHERRILL WELDINGS511 2349 FRUITVALE AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 C C & M TRUCKING SERVIC 3610 ALKEN ST.~! BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CADY'S TRUCK REPAIREN~~ 6830 DOWNING AVE~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA DIESEL 6615 ROSEDALE HIGHWA BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA KENWORTH INC.ENDE-I,E,LDi: 2900 GIBSON S~:F:}~D~:i BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~[~i? CHESTER AVE BRAKE & SUPPLY CO.ENDEIEED~I 19420 COLOMBO S~[I~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 DAVE STITT DIESEL SERVICE 840 MAJORS C OILDALE, CA 93308:~ DAVE'S FLEET MAINTENANCE & TOWINGE~IEED7 3316 JEWETT BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 DAVIS & SON MOBILE TRUCK REPAIRE~.E~.~! 509 STOVER BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307E~E~DJi DELANEY & AHLF DIESEL SERVICE 3901 MERCUR~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308E~F~i7 DICK'S AUTO & TRUCK 3505 STANDARD~.~;} BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~,~ DIESEL POWER SYSTEMS 1340 ROBERTS LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 DUANE'S FLEET SERVICE~P~} 1816 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 DWAIN'S DIESEL ELECTRIC 3200 GULF STEN~~: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~ ED'S 4x4 REPAIR SERVICE 9924 BRIMHALL RD~i BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 FILOTEO'S RAY WELDING SERVICE 3410 FRUITVALE AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 FRANK'S INTERNATIONAL INC. 3951FRUITVALE AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 GIUNTOLI LYNN TRUCK REPAI 3951 E PACHECO RD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 GOLD COAST TIRES & SERVICE 501 E 18TH STEN~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 GOLDEN EMPIRE FLEET SERVICE 490 BELLE TERRACE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS - GIBBS 3525 BUcK OWENS BL BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 JERRY & KEITH'S INC. 4517 STANDARD~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 JIM'S TRUCK REPAIREN~~ 131 KENTUCK BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 JOHNS L V DIESEL ELECTRIC 4233 FOSTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~ KERN BODY WORKS~ 4386 TURCON AVE~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 LAY ENTERPRISES~L~ 3501 FRUITVALE AVE~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~ MEDEARIS ELECTRIC 700 23RD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 PERFORMANCE TRUCK & DIESEL SERVICE 2429 FRUITVALE AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 PETE'S WHEEL 8,: BRAKE SERVICE~z~ 2916 GIBSON $ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~} PHOENIX & SONS TRUCK REPAI 1601 S UNION AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 PIERCE TRUCK REPAI 4615 E BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 PRICE'S MOBILE TRUCK REPAI~ 3600 GIBSON S BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~ QUALITY HEAVY DUTY DIESEL ELECTRIC 4340 TURCON AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 ROSALES MF 240 E 11T BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307~! SOUTH UNION TRUCK REPAI~~j~ 2130 S UNION AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 SPRINGS-A-SPECIAL 19420 COLOMBO ST~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~i VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL ALLISO 4000 ROSEDALE HWYE~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BEACON TRUCK STOP~i 3225 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BEAR MOUNTAIN TRUCK STOP 15840 COSTA JO ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 BRUCE'S TRUCK STOPS INC. 4200 EASTON DRIVE~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 FLYING J TRAVEL PLAZA INC. 17047 ZACHARY AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 RENEGADE TRUCK STOP 2023 METTLER FRONTAGE ROAD WEST BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 BLUE BEACON OF WHEELER mDGE 6101 LAVAL ROAD [~iI BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CORNING TRUCK WASH 8247 KIMBER AV BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 G & S TRUCK WASH INC.~~i 8342 E BRUNDAGE LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 TRUCK TUB 3225 PIERCE ROAD~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 ACCU - TRANS INC 5401 BUSINESS PARK SOUT~:~:I~! BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309~! ALLSTATE TRUCKING & HOT SHOT SERVICE PO BOX 82373 BAKERSFIELD, CA ALOHA FREIGHT CO.~~ 3540 1/2 BRIAN BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308E~IEE~ AMERICAN TRANSFER CO.~I~Dg 5800 STATE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~:E.!E APEX BULK COMMODITIES~i 2111 BRICYN LANE~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308E~~)I ASBURY TRANSPORTATION 5303 ROSEDALE HWYE~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~ B E & M E TRUCKING~~ 2635 HENRY LANEENBF~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BAKERSFIELD-LOS ANGELES MOTOR EXPRESS~p~Ekp~:: 1816 GOLDEN STATE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301~ BAREFIELD TRUCK SERVICE 2800 FAIRHAVEN DRIVE~IEE~7! BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 BRANCH WAREHOUSE~ 220 INDUSTRIAL~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 BROTHERS-N-TRUCKING 6710 DOWNING AVE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~Q BROWN TRUCKING CO~ 4319 ROSEDALE HW BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308~~2 BUTTON TRANSPORTATIONE~~! 9710 ENOS LANE~A~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312~~ BUYS TOM TRUCKING~~ 16915 S UNION AVENUE~~~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307 CAL-WESTERN TRANSPORTE~: ~. 300 FAIRVIEW RD~D BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307~ CENTRAJ~ VALLEY TRANSPORT 8700 SMITH ROAD~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93307~1E~ ,SENDER: Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the * Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for ar . Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): return this card to you. . ' Attach this form to. t~,!ront (~f the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. [] Addressee's Address does not permit~ -' .,~ . . Write"ReturnReceiptRequested"onthemailpiecebelowthearticlenumber, 2. [] Restricted Delivery · The Returo Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addr~.ssed to: ] 4a. Article Number Ci~ISTOPHER BURGER / ~e Typ---~-~--- - KLiETN DENATALE GOLDNER ~ [] Registered [] Insured, P 0 BOX 11t72 ~ ~Certified [] COD (' ~1 BAKERSFIELD CA 93389 1172 / I--I Express Mail ~ Re..ceip. ~7., c ~li~o~l~l~olsetfOr '~ SENDER: * Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to recei' . Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for . Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): return this card to you. . Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. [] Addressee's Address does not permit. ~ · Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number 2. [] Restricted Delivery . The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. ~ti~u~ 642 C~ISTOPHER B~GER _ ~, ROSE~IEB & K~L, L~ I ~r~d '~(~OD B~RSFIE~ CA ~RG 1179 I I~/~ ~erchandise ~: 3775 BUCK O~NS BL~ ~,I~, 5.~ignature (Addressee) [~ [ 8. Ak~'s ~[~Only if requested P~Form 3811, D~cem~ 1~91 /~u.s. ePO:l~2-7~4 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT i.ri 'Peerage $ o 34 *-" 1.10 El- Certified Fee peetmark/ ~_q Return ReCeipt Fee 1.10 Here ru (Endorsement Required) · r"l Restricted' Delivery Fee I-1 (EndorSement Required) · D Tota~.o=ge&~eee $ 2~;54 ~ I Reciplent'$ Name (Please Print Clearly; (To be.c°mPleted,by malle,~ ..... . ............... ........ . ...... BAKERSFIELD CA 93309 Z 410 286 913 P 024 366 ~42 US Postal Service ! " ~j~i RmL_~t for Receipt for Certifi~Mail-- ~ Certified Mail ~'~N'o Insurance Coverage Provided. No Insurance Coverage Provided Do not use for International Mail (See reverse) ~ ~ Do not use for International Mail Sent to (See Reverse) CHRISTOPHER BURGER ~ '~: ' ' s4~{~Ll~I STOPIcIER BDRGEI{ Street and No. Post Office, State, & ZIP Code ~.O. BOX 11172 BAKERSFIELD CA 93389 P.O., State and ZIP Code Postage $ .32 BAKERSFIELD CA 93389 1172 Postage ~ o 3 2 Certified Fee 1.10 Ce'/tified Fee Special Delivery Fee , Special Delivery' Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to 1.10 Restricted Delivery Fee Whom & Date Delivered ~ Return Receipt Showing 10 Return Receipt Showing to Whom~'~ to Whom & Date Delivered ' ~ Date, & Addressee's Address ~ Date, and Addressee's Address · Return Receipt Showing to Whom, · "} TOTAL Postage =ostmmk or Date & Fees {~ 2.5 2 Postmark or Date 0 Lt. SENDER: · ~plete items 1 end/or 2 for additional services. ~ also wish to receive the · ~.~,~plete items 3, and 4a & b. following services {for an extra · Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): return this card to you. · Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. [] Addressee's Address does not permit. · Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number, 2. [] Restricted Delivery · The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. A~icle Number P 024 368 653 C~ISTOP~R B~GER 4b. Service Type ~EIN D~AT~E ~NER ~ Registered ~ Insured P 0 ~OX 11172 ~- ~ertified ~ COD ~~ ~ Merchandise ~[~ ~ . ',,of Delivery 5. ~gn~ture (Addressee) -- ( // ~k _ = ~d~bssee's Address (Only if requested 6.~n~ure ~A~ent) ~ ~ ' 7~'~'~).,, _~, , , PS Form 3811, December 1991 ~u.s. GPo:~,,~l-T14 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P 024 3~ 653 Receipt Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided ~ Do not use for International Mail (See Reverse) s~-ISTOPItER BURGER s?dn"dbx 11172 P.O. State and ZiP Cede BAK~gRSFTELD CA 93389 117; Pos,age $ .3 2 Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to Whom & Date Delivm'ed 1.10 Return Receipt Showing to Whom. Date, and Addressee's Address TOTAL Post·ge & Fees $ 2.5 2 Postmark or Date RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: ~.5 ID# Business Name: ,.~v~ ~(~,~, ,~[~ Con~ N~e: ~ Busin~ Phone: ~?~- I ~7 ~ F~: Insp~or's N~e: 5~<~ Type of C~I: In.ming ~ Outgoing [ ] R~um~ [ ] Actions Required: Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: ., Iq Underground Hazardous Materials Storage Facility State I.D. No. ........ ~ii~!i~iiii:~b,,.?.:.:.,,: nit' No, Number Substance C ~.~i{:~%;.~?'in'~ { ~jj~]~:?:;'~;;;.. ~ :~'.~T y p e M o h'! { 6~i~:~:?':~':?~?:: Type Method Monitoring  HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor ~~-v~ ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~'775- ~ ;<~ {805) ~26-3979 · ENVlRO.TANK~ DOUBLE CONTAINMENT OF TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS modern welding company, inc. METAL PRODUCTS SINCE 1932 [209] 275-9353 :,: 4141 Nodh Brawley Avenue, Fresno, CA 93711 I=LU;ID/VAFJbR DETECT~G~ S¥STE~ THE POLLULERT' FLUID/VAPOR DETECTION SYSTEM HAS APPLICATION FOR YOUR OPERATION. The Pollulert Fluid/Vapor System has been designed and developed by the Mallory Electrical/Ele~ironic Group with one purpose in mind: to monitor leaks of storage tank systems. Either above or underground. You'll be installing state- of-the-art fluid/vapor detection control that protects your business investment. It virtually eliminates the threat of massive clean up or devastating litigation. The Pollulert system will spot the leak in time to stop the loss. Take a I o ok at the rep re se ntati ve applications depicted on these pages. Now imagine your station's layout and superimpose the Poliulert system over your operation. You've just taken the first step toward secudng your business from major financial disaster. The next step is to fill out and mail in the reply card below. I want to be the first to know. Pollulert hydrocarbon leak detection systems detect hazardous leaks the moment they occur. Please send me more information on the following: Number of tanks (please specify) Probe Application: [] Monitoring well [] Double wall tank [] Piping [] Surface spill I-I Vapor [] Steel [] Trench [3 Liquid [] Fiberglass [] Double wall pipe [] Have salesman call. Name 'l:itle Company Addres~ :'., ,' P o L----'~'~LILER ! ' C~'y Stale Z~o , Phone MANUAL NO. 9474 June 15, 1984 GENERAL INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS fiber glass reinforced piping systems .SM ,":. A.O. SMITH-INLAND INC. REINFORCED PLASTICS DIVISION 2700 W. 65th, LI'I-I'LE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72209-8592 (AREA CODE 501) 568-4010 TWX 910 722-7377 RED IAC ET · ',,TWO-SECOND" LEAK DET uCTOR For remote Submersible Petro m Pum.15ing· Sy~ .THE RED IAC KET 3-STEP LEAK TEST The Red Jacket leak detector is a pres- lng system. If a leak is present which GPM.'This is the indication to the oper- sure sensing, diaphragm operated valve equals or exceeds this amount, as ator that a leak is present. designed to indicate a leak in the piping much product escapes from the system If there are no leaks, pressure rapid- between the leak detector and dis- as is metered in through the leak detec- ly builds in the system forcing the leak penser, tor. Under this condition pressure can- detector to open to the full-flow posi- When the submerged pump is turned not build up in the piping system. When lion. In a system with no leaks it takes on, a controlled amount of product a nozzle is opened a poppet in the leak . only two seconds for a complete test. (three gallons per hour) is metered detector moves to a position which No further line testing takes place until through the leak detector into the pip- restricts the flow to approximately 3 the tine pressure drops below 1 PSI. LESS THAN I PSI 8 TO 10 PSI % ~ ABOVE 25 PSI ' FROM PUMP \ 25 PSI ~ I PSI .-~ \ METERING, LESS THAN~ ~ 8 TO 113 PSI ~, ~ ALL PRESSURE I PSI EQUAL ~ 1. THE "TRIP" OR RELAXED POSI- to 10 PSI (Instantly), the diaphragm pensers. Leaks smaller than 3 GPH TION. Under normal operating con- has moved the "poppet" to such a will be indicated by the Leak Detec- ditions, it is assumed that the lines position as to almost stop the flow tot taking longer than two seconds are filled with gasoline which is es- into the piping through 'the leak to open completely. If there is no sentially non-compressible. When detector valve poppet. In this posi- leakage in the system, the small the system pressure is less than I tion, all the flow must then travel flow around the metering pin in- PSI, the diaphragm and poppet are around the metering pin which lim- creases the line pressure to 10 PSI in their "down" or "tripped" posi- its it to approximately 3 GPH rate. in approximately two seconds at lion. The position of the valve "pop- If a simultaneous loss from the sys- which point the diaphragm will snap pet" is such as to allow approxi- tern equals or exceeds this amount, the poppet to position 3. This all mately 3 GPM flow into the delivery the line pressure will not build be- takes place in less time than it takes line, through a bypass opening in' yond this point and the valve will the dealer to reset the dispenser, the leak detector valve poppet, remain in the leak sensing position walk to the car, remove the gas tank when the submersible pump starts, with the main flow blocked. If there cap, insert and open the nozzle. Since the system is full, pressure is an attempt to dispense while the 3. NON-LEAK POSITION. This position builds instantly and the poppet valve is in this position, the line allows full flow. The poppet will re- moves to the leak sensing position, pressure will drop, the diaphragm main in this position as long as the assuming there is no leak present, will respond, and the poppet will system pressure remains above 1 2. LEAK SENSING POSITION. As the return to position I where approxi- PSI. At less than 1 PSI the "poppet" pressure builds to approximately 8 mately 3 GPM will flow to the'dis- will return to position 1. FlED JACKET® L .. ~UM~$ ~ ; A Marley Pump Company Form No. 5170 P.O. Box 3888, Davenport, Iowa 52808 Ci ILDI EPJ~RTIV~ E NT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA POST In a Conspicuous Place at tho Job Site for Duration of Work. DO NOT remove this Card until Final Building Inspection has Been Signed. DO NOT cover up' any work until inspo~tod and signed by Inspector. Phone 326-3720 Impactor Inspector & & INSPECTION Date INSPECTION Date STRUCTURAL PLUMBING .) MECHANICAL ,: ELECTRICAL FINAL PLUMBING FINAL MECHANICAL ! FINAL ELECTRIC .~. FINAL BUILDING & SITE WORK ~,,~,~, ~...~..~..... z..c£. ................ ~, ~...,,o ................. .......... : ............................................. ~ ......... Eh~cL Permit No ......................... Memorandum CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDeCENTFIAL VALLEY FIEGION 3614 E. Ashlan SAN JOAQUIN WATERSHED BRANCH Telephone: (209) 445-5116 Fresno, CA 93726-6905 State Lease Line: 421-5116 TO: Larry W. Beatty FROM: Dale E. Essary Senior Engineer. Staff Engineer DATE: 8 August 1989 SIGNATURE: SUBJECT: C & D TRUCKWASH SITE ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND The subject facility consists of a truck repair shop and a truckwash. The' truckwashing operation is limited to trucks which are not associated with hauling of chemical products. Wash water from the truckwash was discharged into two unlined ponds from 1964 (approximately) until September 1987, at which time the truckwash was connected to the City of Bakersfield sewer system. The Regional'Board adopted Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) in June 1967 (Resolution No. 67-154) for regulation of the on-site waste discharge. On 22 April 1986, a staff member collected sludge samples from the C & D Truckwash ponds. Samples were analyzed for base-neutral/acid extractable compounds (EPA Method 8270), organochlorine pesticides and PCB's (EPA 8080), and volatile halogenated compounds (EPA 8010). The following constituents, all polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's), were detected at concentrations which exceed water quality goals: Minimum Water Detection Quality Concentration Limit Goal Constituent (uq/q) Auenaphthylene 8.8 2.0 .0028 * Anthracene 6.8 2.0 " Benzo(a)anthracene 11.0 2.0 " Chrysene 16.0 2.0 " Fluorene 21.0 2.0 " Pyrene 24.0 2.0 " · EPA 1-in-a-Million Incremental Cancer RiSk Estimate, for sum of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Our letter of-22 September 1986 asked C & D Truckwash to submit a work plan for conducting a study to determine the extent of soil degradation by base-neutral/acid extractable'organic compounds (EPA Method 8270) and purgeable aromatic compounds (EPA 8020) beneath the disposal ponds. C & D TRUCKWASH SITE ASSESSMENT -2- A work plan dated 9 July 1987 was submitted by John R. Wilson, Registered Civil Engineer, and reviewed by staff. Staff comments on the work plan were provided to the discharger with our letter of 18 August 1987. A revised work plan dated 7 October 1987 was submitted by John R. Wilson, and that plan was implemented. A report of findings of the study entitled Assessment of On-Site Disposal Pondsa C & D Truck Wash, Bakersfield, California (Assessment Report), was submitted by John R. Wilson in May 1988. The comments below pertain to my review of the May 1988 Site Assessment Report. PROVIDED INFORMATION The disposal site consists of an unlined excavation 150 feet by 220 feet in area, used for percolating and evaporating washwater from the truckwash. The excavation is three to eight feet below natural grade. In late 1987, after the truckwash facility was connected to the City of Bakersfield sewer system, the excavation was allowed to dry. Three test holes were drilled using continuous flight hollow stem auger equipment. Samples were collected with a split-spoon sampler at ground surface, and at five-foot intervals until ground water was encountered. The surface soil samples and the samples collected at five-foot depths were tested for purgeable organics (EPA 8020) and base-neutral/acid extractable organics (EPA 8270). Water was encountered at a depth of 18 feet below natural ground surface. The soils between ground surface and the saturated zone consist of slightly silty to clean, medium fine to coarse sands. Water samples were not collected. Test results indicate that no constituents were detected in any of the samples. The ewner'wishes t~ close the excavation by grading the excavation to surface elevation. COHMENTS Soil samples were tested by BC Laboratories, Inc., Bakersfield, in accordance with EPA Method 8020. Soil tests were also conducted using EPA Method 8270byFGL Environmental, Analytical Chemists, Santa Paula, and by Analytical Technologies, Inc., San Diego. These labs are State certified labs for the test methods indicated. Appropriate holding times were observed in all cases. Laboratory results submitted in the Assessment Report indicate that most of the detection limits for constituents tested using EPA MethOds 8020 and 8270 are higher than applicable water quality goals, by C & D TRUCKWASH SITE ASSESSMENT -3- several orders of magnitude. Detection limits ranging from 0.013 to 2.3 parts per billion are achievable for PAH's by using EPA Method 610/8310, according to EPA Handbook SW 846, 3rd Edition. Laboratory results of EPA Method 8270 represent total concentrations of semi-volatile organic constituents present in the soil samples, expressed in units of milligram of constituent per kilogram of solid waste (mg/kg). Water quality goals represent soluble concentration limits of each constituent in units of milligram constituent per liter water (mg/1), and are not directly comparable to total soil concentrations. Therefore, I used the Designated Level Methodology to determine the Total Designated Level for constituents of a solid waste, as calculated by the following formula: Total Water Environmental Leachability Designated = Quality X Attenuation X Factor Level (mg/kg) Goal (mg/1) Factor Determination of the Environmental Attenuation Factor (EAF) and Leachability Factor (LF) is dependent on site-specific conditions. Boring logs provided in the report suggest that the site consists of moderately to highly permeable surface and subsurface soils. Considering thi~ and the relatively shallow depth (18 feet) to ground water encountered during sampling, I used an EAF of 10. The LF is equal to the reciprocal of the fraction of the constituent concentration that is leachable, which is a function of the biochemical activity of the site soils. The Designated Level Methodology suggests using a LF of 10 for toxic organic constituents when information on the leachable fraction of solid waste constituents is unavailable. Total Designated Levels for EPA Method 8270 constituents were developed using these factor values, and using the most restrictive water quality goals available for the protection of ground water for domestic use. The Total Designated Levels that were determined to be lower than the applicable detection limits are listed in the table below. Detection limits from laboratory results submitted in the report are also listed for comparison. C & D TRUCKWASH SITE ASSESSMENT -4- Water Total Detection Quality Designated Constituent Limit (ma/k~) Goal (mq/ll Level(mq/kq) Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's): .0000028 (sum) .00028 (sum) * Acenaphthylene 1.0 * Anthracene 0.17 * Benzo(a)anthracene 1.0 Benzo(a)pyrene 1.0 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.0 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.0 * Chrysene 1.0 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1.0 * Fluorene 0.17 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene 1.0 Phenanthrene 0.17 * Pyrene 1.0 Benzidine 1.7 .0000003 .00003 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 0.17 .00003 .003 2-Chlorophenol 0.17 .0001 .01 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.17 .0003 .03 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 0.34 .00001 .001 2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.17 .0003 .03 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 5.0 .013 1.34 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.17 .00011 .011 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 1.0 .000042 .0042 Hexachlorobenzene 0.17 .00000072 .000072 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.17 .00045 .045 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.17 .001 .1 Nitrobenzene 1.0 .0005 .05 N-nitrosodimethylamine 0.17 .000003 .0003 N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1.0 .0049 .49 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.17 .0012 .12 * Detected in April 1986 Regional Board sludge samples As indicated, the detection limits from laboratory results greatly exceed the Total Designated Levels in most cases. However, the Designated Level Methodology indicates that if a calculated Designated Level falls below the detectable concentration using currently available analytical methods, Designated Levels should be set at the lowest acceptable method detection limit achievable. C & D TRUCKWASH SITE ASSESSMENT -5- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The Assessment Report indicates that no constituents were detected using EPA Methods 8020 and 8270. However, detection limits are higher than applicable water quality goals for most constituents tested by EPA 8020 and 8270, by several orders of magnitude. 2. Detection limits of EPA Method 8270 test results are higher than Total Designated Levels calculated for the site using the Designated Level Methodology. 3. The Designated Level Methodology indicates that Designated Levels should be set at the lowest acceptable method detection limit achievable. Lower detection limits are achievable for PAH's by using EPA 610/8310. 4. A ground water sample should be collected and tested for PAH's in accordance with EPA Method 610 to determine whether ground water pollution has occurred beneath the site as a result of past waste discharge operations. Soil sample test results in this case are of limited value in determining whether there is a potential for ground water pollution. FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY PERMIT ~: ~D~J ENV. SENSITIVITY: Activity Date # Of Tanks Comments STATE OF CALI'FORI',,IIA GEORGE DEUKMEJI~N. Governor - __---=. _ ~' __..---= CALIFORNIAcENTRAL VALLEyREGIONALREGIoNWATER JALIIY CONTROL BOARD-- SAN JOAQUIN WATERSHED BRANCH OFFICE: 3614 EAST ASHLAN AVENUE ~ - FRESNO. CALIFORNIA 937:26 PHONE: (209) 445-5116 ~..~.,,: ! .., Mr. Chuck Jimers~n C & D Truck Wash 3775 Pieroe P~ad Bakersfield, CA 93308 WORK PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF ON-SITE DISPOSAL PONDS AT C & D TRUCK We have reviewed your proposed work plan for assessing the extent of decjradation at y~ur facility. Enclosed is a memo containing our c~.L~_nts on the work plan. As indicat_~ in the memo, a map showing the proposed borehole locations should be submi~ before the investigation begins. In addition, the work plan should be modified to incorporate the other If you should have any questions concerning tb~ matter, pl~se telephone Russell Walls at (209) 445-6192. Senior Engineer cc: Kern Oounty Health Department, Bakersfield v/' Mr. John Wilson, Civil Engineering Oonsultant, Bakersfield Mernorandun CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ,CENTRAL VALLEY REGION 3614 E. Ashlan SAN JOAQUIN WATERSHED BRANCH Telephone: (209) 445-5116 Fresno, CA 93726-6905 State Lease Line: 421-5116 TO: JAMES B. WOLFSON FROM: RUSSk~T,T, W. ~5~LLS / "~ Senior Engineer Staff Engineer SUBJECT: WORK PLAN FOR ASS~ OF ON-SITE DIS~ PONDS AT C & D Ti~ $~S"I-I, KERN ODUNTY I have reviewed the subject work plan. C & D Truck Wash proposes to conduct an investigation of the soil beneath the holding ponds at the facility. The investigation is being performed to determine how far downward organic cc~ have migrated that were found in surface sludge samples. The work plan proposes three soil borings be drilled to ground water Which is estimated to be 15 to 30 feet below ground surface. Soil samples will be taken at 5 foot intervals starting at the surface and continuing down to ground water. Initially, samples taken fr~m the 5 foot depth will be analyzed for EPA Test Method 8020 and 8270 constituents. The remaining samples will be preserved for future testing, if required. A time schedule for conducting the investigation'was also submit. My on the work plan are as follows: 1. A map showing the proposed borehole locations needs to be submit. 2. A state certified lab should be u~ed for all analyses. 3. The ~nximum holding time for EPA Test Method 8020 and 8270 soil samples is 14 days according to EPA Ma~ml SW 846, 3rd edition. Therefore, soil ~%mples should be analyzed within 14 days to be considered valid. 4. ~he time schedule presented for conducting the investigation is satisfactory. In conclusion, a map showing the prc?.c.sed borehole locations should be submitted before the investigation b~ ~ins. In addition, the work plan should be modified to incorporate my other cu~.~nts. F~R'M~-~E~, CHECK ALL ~PP-~-~R~'~TE BOXES 2. ~ ~te~ial i~rglass-Re info~c~ Plastic ther (de~ri~) .... 3. ~ Contai--nt ~te Ins~il~ ~ic~ess (Inches) 4. . n ~ o~ary contai~nt ~r (de~ri~): 5. Tank Interior~~ 6. Ta~ Corrosion P~o~ctl~ · . ~Ta~ Flint ~e ~l~t Vent Valv~ ~ ~to S~t- Off C~rols 11. b. U~ergro~ Pipl~ Corrosi~ Prot~ti~ c. U~ergro~ Pipit, ~ary Contai~nt~ ' - ;Facility Name __lj~.~,_ .-{~- ~1~..~-o, ~erm~t TANK. ~_ _~..~._ __~. (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK 9,ti APDROPRIA?F. BOXES 1. Tank is: ['[Vaulted [']Non-Vaulted []Double-Wall ~Si~91e-Wall 2. ~ Material f r--~ Steel I-] s~ainless Steel l-~Polyvinyl Chloride [-IFiberglass-Clad iberglass-Reinforced Plastic !-! Concrete [] Altm~intsa [2] Bronze ther (describe) ......... 3. erimar¥ Contaimge. nt' Date,Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. ~ ContainmenE ......... ~~l'-~Synthetic Linar U1ginad Vault ~iona [~Othar (describe): Hanufactugsrl I')Macerial ThiCkneSs (Inches') Cape¢lt¥ (Gals.) _ ' 5. Tank Interior L~ --'~~~ l')~ox¥ [-[Phenolic fflGlass FIClay ~lt~linad ~t~kno~m ~Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protectf~ --]~Oilvanized -'~i~--~amm-C~.ad [')Pollmthylene Wrap I'lVlnyl OTar or Asphe!t ~~ ~ OOther (describe),_ : , Ca ,chodlc protection~ g~ l-]Imp~esesd Current System n~acri[lcial J~mde 7. ,Leak Detection, Monitoring, andt~ m. ?ank{ or&mural (vsulted tanks only) ~{Oroumitmter Wonitori~J' kl~ll{s) [OV&do~e Zone I~mitorin9 klmll(s) C]U-~uhe Mtthout Liner ?iU -~ub~ ei~h ccm. p~_~ibls Liner Directirq Flo¥ to Monitorirq Vapor l~tectom' I'1 Liquid Level 9en~or' O ¢c~ductivi?¥ Smm~or' ~3 Pressure Smmor in /umulmr Swce of Do~ble Wall Tank .. [-[Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Frs U-1~be, ~o~i~orin9 Wall or &vu~lar Space ~i1¥ Gauqirq & Inventory Reconcilistic~ [-[Periodic b. PiRin~ flme-Restrictirq Leak De'tsctor('s} 'for Prmuriz~d ~ping' ..... UIMo~itorirrj S~mp with Rac~¥ [-[Sealed Concrete Rec~¥ Oliali-Cu~ C~mpstlble pipe Race,my [-[Synthetic Liner Racetmy *Describe Make & Node1, .................. 8. ~ ~ightness Tested? i-lyes OMO Date of Lest Tightr~ Test Results of Test, Test Name ~stln~ Conpeny ........... Repaired? [-[Yes OMo ~iU~kno~ DaCe(s) of Repair(s) Describ~ Repairs " ' 10. ~ Protection ~9~rmtor {ills, Controls, i Visually Non&tots l~vel fflTapa Float Gau~e [-[Float Vent Valves [] auto Shut- Off Controls BC aPscitence Sensor ['[Sealed Fill ~ox OMone []t~kno~ Other ~ List Make & Model F~ Above Devices a. Underground Pipin9: ~yes [INs []Unknown Material Thic~ (i~h~) Dieter ~ufacturer b. U~o~ Pipi~ Corrosi~m Prot~tl~ : ~lvani~ OFi~rglas~l~ ~wes~ ~rent O~ri~icial 8 ~l~yle~ Wrap ~El~tri~l I~lati~ ~Vinyl ~ ~Tar ~ ~lt U~o~ ~ ~her i~ri~) ~ c. U~ergro~ eipig~ Seco~ary Cont~i~nt: ~1~11 ~~etic Liar ~stm ~ ~om ~OC~r (de~rl~): IL 1. Tank is: OVaulted [~]Non-Vaulted [~Double-~all [']Single-Wall 2. T~nk ~terial ~-Car~n Stol ~S~inless Steel O~l~inyl ~oride ~Fi~glass~l~ S~I ~ Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~ Co. fete ~O~er (de~ri~) ............. -' ...... 3. ~ Contai~nt ~ts ~s~l'l~ ' ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~11~) 4. ~~o~v C~tai~nt ' -- ~~Ot~r (de~ri~). . , ~uf~~ , O~rial ~ic'~ess '(l~s) ,, , ~ity (~ls.) ...... 5. Ta~ Inte~io~ Lini~ ~Ot~r (~ri~) ~ . ,, . ~U-~ wi~ Cm~tible Liar Oir~ti~ ~1~ ~.~ J. ~ ~ VaWr ~~r' 0 U~ ~el ~r O~ ~ O~r .............. ... ,. b. Pi~l~ Fl~R~trictl~ ~ak ~t~to[(s) for ~~l~ ~ipl~ ~ri~ ~ ~ ~ ......... ~st ~ ~sti~ ~y 9. ~(8) o~ ~i;(8) ..... ~ri~R~irl, , ........................ Pro~ti~ O?a~ Flint ~e Orl~t V~t Valv~ ~ ~ S~t- Off Cmtroll a. ~r~r~ Pipit: ~s ~ ~ic~m (i~) ~i~t~r ~nufac~er b. U~ergro~ pipi~ C~rosTm ~ot~tim c. U~ergro~ Pipit, 9eco~mv ~Ot~r (de~rl~): Kern County Health Department Permit Number A056 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 CT 05 (805)~. 861-3636 PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANEN? CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Facility Name and Address Owner Name .and Address HOldens Truck Center .. Chuck Jimerson 3775 Pierce .Road ~ '3775 Pier.~e Road' 4 tanks at above Approval Date Qpnditlons as Follows~: 1:.Permtttee must obtain permit from Fire Departmeht prior ~0 initiating aba.ndo.~ent, action. impl~entati. Rn ~.E" Kern County' :.Ordinance ~de :' ,~:3g~i. copy of' these' requirements are enclosed ~l. th,,ghis pemit. 4. A minimum of four samples per ~ank,':at depths o~ ta.k, 'and every 15 linear ~'feet ','~?f "'",'p~e retrieved and sampled for benzene, '~o1~:, Xylene,.'and ,,~ 5. Advise this office of 'time an4 date'of' with 24 hours advance, notice. '- P By Date Acce_ted ~ . , . ........ i Kern-'C~'~un t ~ llealth 'Division, o£ Enviro~nental He~: Appiic=tior 1700 Flo~r Street, Bakersfi~, CA 93305 ~PLI~TION FOR PE~IT ~ OPE~TE UNDE~R~D ~~S SUBST~CES S~E [ACILI~ ~ of Applicatioq~check): ' ~ Fa~lity ~ification of Facility ~i~ti~ Facility ~ansfer of ~er~ip A. ~ergen~ 24-~ur Contac~ (n~e, area c~e, ~one): ~ys~~ ,/ ~ ~ . ~ / Night~ ~ of B~ineE~ ]~heck): ~line S~tfon,~~ (de~ri~) Is Tank(s) ~cat~ on ~ Agricultural Fa~? ~Y~ Is Tank(s) Us~ P~tl~ for ~rkc~ltura~r~ses? ~Yes ~ ~- T R ~ SEC (R~a~atfons ~ly) ~dr ess ~ .... ~ Zip Tele~ne ~ ..r . Facility provid~ by ~7, ~' ~P~ ~ro~~r  ~il ~racteristics' at Facility ~ ~sls for Soi! ~ ~.Gro~~r ~ ~te~inatio~ - / Pro~s~ ~ker ' s )..~If ~ia ~t ~_For ~ifi~tign Of ~ ~1~. ~cilltv, B~fly ~ri~ ~i~ic~t~ Pro~ ,. T~(a) Store t a~ly): ~ [ ~m~ "~u~ ~tor Vehicle Unl~ R~ular Pr~i~ Die~l ~sts . ~~1 ~llgtm of ~terials S~r~ (~t ~es~ry for Ta~_. ~ ~i~l'Stor~ (n~c~rct~l ~ ~ ~ (if kn~) ,/' l ....... ~if~r te~ ~te ~e traffic ~e ~mit to ~rate ~is ~ergro~d scor~e fatty u~n r~ivl~ ~ls c~plet~ fora. ~is fora ~s ~en c~plet~ ~der ~lty of ~rj~y a~ ~ ~e tr~ a~ ~t. _ / Ho ..,en Truck Plaza-,. 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California 93308 Phone 327-5781 (805) October lO, 1985 Ann Boyce Kern County Health Department Environmental Health Division [700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Dear Ann: This is to inform you and your agency of the method I will employ to contain the soil removed from the excavated underground gasoline tanks (removed September 1985). My plan of containment is: I. Excavate a receiving area 27 feet wide and 57 feet long and 4 feet deep. 2. Install a 60 mil high density polyethylene liner. 3. Back fill the containment area with the "subject" soil (approximately 180 cubic yards). 4. Encapsulate the "containment area" with 3 inch base material covered with 3 inch asphalt. It is my f~rm belief that this material will no longer be a contaminant to the surround{ng soil and or underground water supply. If there is any questions, please contact me. I would like to expidite this procedure to eliminate another area of environmental concern to both your agency and myself. Respectfully submitted, 7 Chuck J£m~rson Owner I have read the foregoing informati, on and accept Mr. Jimerson's plan for containment of the "gasoline soil" on the premi-s.es at Holden Truck Plaza. z A~{n Boyce ',,/ Kern County HealthDepartment Environmental Health Division Permit 'Kern County Health Department~ Division o£ Environmental Hee Application, ~_1700 Flo~r Street, Bakersfierd, CA 93305 ~PLI~TION ~R PE~IT ~ OPE~TE ~E~R~ ~~US SUBST~CE$ S~E FACILI~ ~ of ~lication (ch~): ~Ne~ Fac~y ~ification of Facility ~isti~ Facility ~ansfer of ~ership ~ of B~iness (check): ~'~Iine S~tion ~er (de~ri~) Is Tank(s) ~cat~ on ~ Agricultural Fa~? ~Y~ ~ Is Tank(s) Us~ ~imarily for ~ricultur. al ~r~ses? ~Yes ~dress t i%% ~ Zip Tele~one ~il ~ractertstics at Facility ~; ~.~ ~ ~sis for Soil ~ a~ Gro~ter ~p~ ~rker's C~~ti~ Certific~[{~ { ' Insurer ' E. T~k(s) Store (~eck all ~t a~ly): Ta~ ~ ~s~ Pr~uct ~tor Vehicle Unlead~ ~ Pr~i~ Die~l ~ste ...... ....... E. G. Transfer of Ownership Date of ~nsfer Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept fully all Obligations of" Permit No. issued to · I understand that the Permittin~ Authority may review and modify or termir{ate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~e~dergro~d storage facility upon receiving this c~mpleted form. This form has been c~mpleted under penalty vf pe~ i-,fy and to the best of my knowledge is true and corr ,e~,. . T~K (FILL OUT ~EPA~TE ~ .' ~ T~K) .~ ~R ~H SE~I~, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIA~ ~XES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vault~ ~Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all 2. ~ ~terial  ar~n Stol ~ S~inless Steel ~l~inyl C~o~ide ~Fi~rglass~l~ Steel i~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Co~rete ~ ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ ther (de~ri~) 3. Pri~r~ Contai~nt ~6~Ins~lf~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~11o~) ~nu~acturer 4. Tank '~co~arY Contaf~nt ' ~1~11 ~thetic Liner OLi~ Vault ~ne O~o~ ~Other (de~ri~): ~nufacturer: ~terial ~ib~ess (Inc~s) Ca.city (~ls.) 5. Tank Interior ~ Ot~r (de~ri~): 6. Tank Corrosion Protecti~' 7. Leak ~tection, ~itori~, a~ In~ a. Ta~: ~Vis~l (~ault~ ~ only) ~Gro~ter ~V~ose Z~ ~itori~ ~ll(s) ~~ wi~ut None ~~ ~r ,~~o~ ~er 8. ~st ~e ~sti~ ~ny .... 9. T~k ~ ~(s) o~ ~ir(s) ~Ta~ F~ ~e ~FI~ Ven~ Valv~ ~ Auto Shu~- O~f Controls ., Thick~ (i~hes) Dieter ~nufacturer b. U~o~ pipi~ Corrost~ Prot~tl~ ~l~yle~ Wrap ~Electri~l I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt c. U~ergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~1~'~11 ~~etic Liner ~st~ ~ ~o~ ~Ot~r (de~ri~): H. 1. Tank is: [~¥aulted r~Non-Vaulted ODouble-Wall ~i~le~all 2. ~ ~terial  ar~n Stol ~S~inless Steel ~l~lnyl ~o~ide ~Ff~rglass~l~ Stol i~rglass-Reinfo~c~ Plastic ~Co~rete ~in~ ~Sr~ze ther (de~i~) 3. Pri~r~ Contai~nt ~{e iins~ll~ ' ~ic~ess (In.es) Ca.city (~llons) ~nu~cturer 4. Tank ~co~ar~ C~tat~nt ~1~11 ~thetic Liner ~Li~ Vault ~ ~o~ ~terial ~ic~ess' (I~s) ~city (~ls.) 5. Ta~ Interior~ ~Ot~r (de~rl~) i 6. Ta~ Corrosion D~otectl~ ~rl~ S~ ~ ~ui~ ........... ~ Va~r ~or* ~ ~id ~el ~re ~ C~ivl~ ~ Pre~e ~r in ~lar S~ of ~le ~11 Ta~' . ..... ~ Li~id ~trl~al ~ Inaction ~m O ~,~itori~ ~11 b. Pipi~t Fl~R~tricti~ ~ak '~t~tor(s)' for 'P~uri'~ ~ipi~ *~rl~ ~ & ~I~ ' ' 8. ~ank ~l~h~ 9. T~ Re~i~ ' / ' - ~ri~ Re, irs ......... '. ..... 10. ~e~flll Propel0n ~rator Fills, C~trols, s Vl~lly ~i%ors ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valv~ ~ Auto S~t- Off  ~i~e b~r ~bal~ Fill ~x ~ ~o~ O~r: List ~ & ~1 f~ ~ ~ic~ .. ..... _,_,. , Thick~ (i~hes) Dieter ~nufacturer b. U~er9ro~ Plpi~ Corrosi~ Prot~tl~ : ' ~lvani~ ~Fi~rgla~l~ ~es~ ~rent ~rificial U~o~ ~ ~~ (~ri~): --.. .... c. ~ergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Con~ai~nt: OOt~r (de~rl~): (FILL ~T ~EP~TE U~ ~ T~K) ~ SE~I~, ~E~ ~ ~OP~IA~ ~XES H. 1. Tank is~ ~Vault~ ~Vault~ ~uble~all ~i~le~all 2. ~ ~terial ar~n stol ~S~inless Steel ~l~inyl ~o~ide ~Fi~glass~l~ Stol i~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic Dc°~rete ther (de~ri~) 3. Priory Contai~nt · ~t~, I~l'[~ ~lc~ess (I~hes) Ca~ci~ (~llons) ~nufa~tu~er 4. Tank ~ ~ai~nt ' ~~1~11~ ~thetic Liner ~ Li~ Vault ~~ ~o~ ~Ot~r (de~ri~): ~nufacturer ~terial ~ic~ess (Inc~s) ~city (~ls.) 5. Ta~ lnterior~~ ~~~ ~xy ~menollc ~Glass ~Clay ~mli~ 6. Ta~ Corrosion P~otecti'~ ' ' ' 7. ~k ~t~tion, ~itori~, ~ In~rceptl~ ~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ ~ld ~el ......... b. Pipi~ Fl~R~tricti~ ~ak ~{~tor{s) for p~e~Uriz~ Pipit' ''  ltori~ ~p ~ ~y ~1~ 8. Tank Tl~h~ 9. T~ Re, ir ~ / ~ri~ Re. irs ......... 10. ~erfill Pro~ti~ ~rato~ Fills, Cmtrols, ~ Vl~lly ~itofs ~vel OTa~ F~t ~e OFl~t Vent Valv~ ~ Auto S~t- Off Controls  ~i~e ~r O~al~ Fill ~x. O~ ~o~ O~r~ List ~ & ~1 F~ ~ ~ic~ n. ............ ' / ' ~hic~ (i~hes) Dieter ~nufacturer b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosi~ Prot~ti~ : ~lvani~ OFl~rqla~l~ ~es~ ~rent ~ri[icial  l~yle~ ~rap OEl~tri~l I~lati~ OVinyl Wr~ OTar or ~lt c. U~ergro~ Pipit, Sectary Contai~nt: Facility Name ~a t~ "~-~ ~ Permit TANK ~_ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACH TANK) FOR"E~-~ SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES Ii. 1. Tank is: [~Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted [2]Double-Wall ~Single-Wall 2. ~ Material . a--~ Steel [-] Stainless Steel [-] Polyvinyl Chloride [-] Fiberglass-Clad Steel iberglass-Reinforced Plastic [2] Concrete [-i Al~nin~ [~ Bronze [-~Unknown ther (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date~I~stalled Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Man. uf?cturer 4. Tank 'Secondary Co~[air~ent ~Double-Wall t-lsynthetic Liner l~Lined Yault ~None [-IOther (Oescribe) '. Manufacturer; [].a ter ial ThickneSS (Inches) CaFa¢lt¥ (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Linin9 --~Rubber I'lAlkyd [-{L~oxy •men•lac •Glass []Clay Or. lined nother (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ...... --~GalVanized ~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap [-1Vinyl Wrappinq []Tar or Asphalt ~bl~nown []None ~lOther (describe): ~ , .. Cathodic Prot~q. ti.9..n..' ~None ['lImlxessed Current System ~'lSacrlfici&l De'scribe System & Equi~ment: .. ~a.~..,~ Tank: ['iVis~---'~-T~~ks only) [qGrour~ter Monitorl~' W~ll(s) fl~" ['lVadose Zone Monitorl~ Well(s) []U-~4~be. Without Liner '~ e.~'~' []U-Tube with C~mpatible Liner Dirsctin~ Flow to ~k>nitorl~ We.Ii(s)* ~7 Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank' . . . [] Liquid Rmtriwal & Insi~ction Fr~m U-Tube, Monitori~ Well or A~m~lar Space ['1P ally Gaugll~ & Ir~fentory R?_~?ci%iati~n ['[$~riodic Tightness b. Pipin~ Flow-Restrictirq Leak Detector(s) fOr Pressurizt~ Pipil~'~-' .... ~Monitori~ St~sp with Race,my []Sealed Co~crete nkn lf-Cut Compatible Palm Race.y •Synthetic Liner Race.y OM•ne o~ []Other *Describe Make & l~xlel'.~ ' '8. Tank T~htness s s en Tight.ss T~sted? EYes ilNO Date of Last Tightness Test Results'of Test Test N~me Testi~ C~mi~ny .. Repaired? []Yes Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs ........... Protection ~>perator Fills, Co~trols, & Visually ~onitors ~svel [~lTape F~oat Gauge I-IFloat Vent Valves [-1Auto Shut- Off Controls  Capacitsnce Sensor I-ISealed Fill Sox [~]None [-Iunkno~ Other~ List Make & Model F~ Abov~ Devices a.Underground Piping: ~eS ['INo [-]L~kno~'~ Material :~i~-i Thic_~ness (inches) Dlamete~ ~anulacturer ti]~ressurenit []S~ct'ion []Gravity APProximate Length Of Pfp~ b. erground pipirg Corrosion Protection : U1Galvanized [1Fiberglass-Clad [-llmpressed Current I-lSacrit[l¢lal Anode [21~olyeth¥1ene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation [-lVin¥1 Wrap [-ITar or Asphalt ~nkno~ ['1None []Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment~ [~Double-Wall [2]synthetic Liner System []None ~nknown U1Other (describe): TANK (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM · EACH TANK) --F~R--EACH SECTION,--~ECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: J-]Vaulted ['lNon-Vaulted ~'lDouble-Wall ~ir~le-i~all 2. ~ Material ~Ca--~ Steel [-] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride 0 Fiberglass-Clad Steel L-] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic D concrete n Alt~nin~ O Bronze [-]Unknown [] Other (describe) 3. primary Containme_ nt I~a{:e Ins~lled Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manu~_acturer [~]Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protecti'on ..... --[~G~~-~-~ass-Clad [Polyethylene Wrap OVinyl t~rapping ~]Tar or Asphalt ~kno~ _~]No~e nOther (describe)~_ ..' .. Cathodic Protection,: ~None nlmpressed Current Systm ~]Sacrif[lcl&l ~ode ~--~ribe System & Equilment: .... 7. Lea~ Detection, Monitori~, and ~ ~Tank~~ '~Visual (Vaulted----tanks only) []Grourd~ter Nonitoring' t~ell (s) ~ ~!) [~]Wdose Zone Monitoring ~ell(s) ffi~ Without Liner ..~' ,~,_..\o~;'~ [:]U-Tube with C~patible, Liner Directing_~ Flow to Monitoring t~.ll (s)* · ~ !'1 Vapor l~tsctor [:] Liquid L~vel Sensor r-I ¢ondu~tivity Sensor ~ '.d~,/ n prsssure senaor in Annular Space of Poubls Wall Tank ..'. ,...U O Liquid I~trieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring l~ell or ~anular Space ~ []-[Daily Gauging & Inventory Re___conc$li~tion [~Periodic Tl!Jht41ass Testir~ ~--' b. Pipingt Flow-Restricting Le~k' ~tector(s) [~r pressurized piping'~' [~Nonitoring s~ap with Race,my []']Sealed Co~crete Racei~y ['].Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Race,my [Stmthetic Liner Race,my l~nknom [Other *~scribe Make& Nodel: 8. Tank Tightness Sas TInS Tan~ Seen Tightness Tested? rTyes []No [']Unknown Pate of Last Ti9htness Test .Results of Test Test Nsme ~esting C~mpany .... ~a~ l~epaired? ['lYes hmo ~kno~n Pate(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. p. ro, c, ti,on ~Dperator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level ~Tape Float Gauge nFloat Vent Valves ['1 Auto Shut- Off Controls B Capacitance Sensor [-[Sealed Fill 8ox [~None nunkno~ Other: List Nake & Nodel For Abov~ Devices a. Underground Piping: ~]PYe, Olio nunknown Material Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer _~Pressure [']Suc~Gravity Approximate Length 0f PiP® b. underground Piping Corrosion Protection = nGalvanized /'lFiberglass-Clad [-~Impressed Current nsacrtficial ~ode  Onnlyethylen~ Wrap OElectrical Isolation OVinyl Wrap ['~Tar or As~lt known l'lNone '[]:]Other. (describe): ¢. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment: 1'TDouble-Nall nsynthe~i¢ Liner System nNone ~known nother (describe): TANK ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM~ EAClt TANK) FOR EACH SEC~iON, ~CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: [~Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted {-IDouble-Wall l~Single-Wall 2. Ta~ Material  Carbon Steel [~ Stainless Steel [] Polyvin¥1 Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Alumin~n [] Bronze Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Dater.1 ,~ l.?~/'nstal led_, ,~ '" ~hickness (Inches), Capacity (Gallons) Ma~ufacturer,~,,~ ~-~ ~ ~. ~. 4. Tank Secon_~_9_~~ Cor{tair~nent [~Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner []Lined Vault nNone 4~lkno~n rlOther (describe): Manufacturer: ['1 Ma ter iai Thickness (Inches) Capaci ty (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior ~ ~]Rubber []Alkyd ~Epox¥ []Phenolic ['lGlass [-IClay [-Iunlined ~akno~ [2]Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion ProtectiOn . --~Galganized "~'~%~--~Tass-Clad ['lPoly~thylene Wrap ['lVin¥1 Wrappirq [~Tar or Asphalt ~t~ [~]None ['lOther (describe)~ .:, .. ~ prot~tion:--~_ne qlm~essed Current Sys~m ~lSacrl~lc{~ a~ode S~stm ~ ],lDescribe System & Equil~nt. _ .... ?. ~i Pet~tion, Nonitorir~ and I~{t~'rceptl'on ['lVedose lon~ No~ltoring ~ll(s) ['1~ Without Liner ~]U-Tub~ with C~.patible Linar Dir~ctir~] Flow to NonitoriN ' ~' i~ I-I Vapor Dstsctor* O Liquid I~el Sensor" O Conductivity Sensor' ~l/~~' [-1 Pressure S~naor in Annular Spa. of _~l~le Wall [~Llquid Retri~val & Insp~tion Fr~m U .Tu~,_Monitoring ~11 or ~ular Spac~ Ulpally ~u~i~ i I_nventory R~coflciliatio~ nperiodic Tightness Testing [].one ~lmkno~ rioter .................. . .. b. Pipi~z l~low-Restricti~ Leak patect°r(s) fOr Pressurized PiplN'  onitori~ S~p with Rec~m¥ ['lSesled Concrete Rec~m¥ ltalf-Cut C~mpatible pips Ra~m¥ [-I Syntl~tic Linar Ra~m¥ , ~nkno~ E] Ot~r ....... D~scribe Make & ~x]~l~ ............... '8. Tank Tightness ~as ~ls ~an~ a~n Tlgh~ss ~sted? Elves ~.o [~nkno~ Pate of Las~ Tiohtnm Test Results of T~st Test ~ ~sting C~mpan¥ 9. Tank Repair ........ ~e~ir~? FlYes [].o ~known Pate(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection ~at~o~ Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors L~vel ['lTape F~oat Gauge []Float Vent Valves El Auto Shut- Off Controls  Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box [].one []t~kno~ Other~ List Make & Model Fo~ Above Devices a. t~dergrouad Piping ~ ~JJ~es [~.o E]unkno~ Material ~. , Thic~ (i~h~) ~i~ter ~nufacturer ~es~re ~tion ~r~ity ~o{iMte ~ ~~ b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ CorrosI~ Prot~tl~ ~ ~lvani~ ~Fi~rgla~l~ ~es~ ~rent ~rificial ~  l~yle~ Wrap ~El~tri~l I~lati~ ~Vinyl ~ ~Tar ~ ~lt ~o~ ~ ~her (~ri~): , . c. U :ergro~ Pipit, Sectary Contai~nt: ~1~11 ~~etic Liner ~st~ ~ <~o~ ~Ot~r (de~ri~): iv.i )n of Enviro~ental Health, Application ?O0 !o~er Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 ~. of Tanks ~ of Al~lication (Fill Out O~e Application lar ['aci [-]Temporar¥ Closure/A~ndo~e~ Closu, : oject ~fl~ct ~rea c~e I :.~ility ~ ~,~cil ity ~dr~a St. '~ ~ ~v)_____ _ ____._~_~~ 5~~ '1 A -. ~p~ O~rator ~ldrs~ " - lip f~il C~ractefisti~ at Facility . ~sis for ~11 ~ ~ Gr~~r ~ ~mimti~ ~ ' ~m./, ~ da~.: ~-I-~ ~~ ~ ' '_ P:-;'o~ S~rt .~ ~ ,1, ti~ ~ . ' _. _ - - "' Ch~l~l C~sltl~ ol ~eria~ ~pl'' Will ~ ~l~ '0' ~ -- a~lica~l~ [or~ ~~1 or ~a~n~ ~ pla~ This HOLDEN TRUCK cENTER 24 HOUR ..ES.^U AN · · 3775 PIERCE ROAD · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 ~ ~ BARBER SHOP · INSIDE 70' LUBE PIT - 70' SCALE · PROPA~E PHONE 327-5781 · DIESEL TRUCK REPAIR PHONE 327-5783 ~ ~ SHOWERS * TICKET PRINTER PU~,~PS * KEY LOCK FL~I LIQUID NITROGEN · BUNK FIOU~E * ~LOWE~(/~1) 5UHKER ICE Member N~tlon~l Tr~clmrs 5evvic~ Kem Co~ty Health ~r~nt ~f;o ~ ~1~ ,. ,~~-- ~x~ro~ntal H~lth Division 1700 Flower Street . ~ar g~ss ~yce: ~c[esed y~ w~[ f~nd ~he ~cessa~, ~ms ~or applicar~m for ~o o[~ra~e mder~omd ~affi~. In addition to ~hose appl~cation~ w~ ~ed necessa~ ~om for re~sr~ng in grornd tank a~mn~ ~or 3 ro 4 ~ergromd ta~s ~r~ the course of the next 3 years. ~e f~rsr of ehese ra~ closures shoed ~ ta~ #4 aa-I tac~ ~5 as ~ the enclosed plot n~p. ~ese ~s ~ve ~en our of se~w~ce for so~ r~, and se~e no pract~l At th~s t~m we aro as~ t~t these ~ ~s ~ clos~ ~n place, a~ f~lled ~th an acceptable ~ne~. By ah~mnt ~n place, a~ closed pro,fly, th~s e~mtes ~rene~al safety ~rds at d~s~sai si~es such. as ~ri~ the co, se o~ the next twelve to rh~rry-s~x rmnths, ~s fac~liCy ~11 ~ all re~n~ mdergromd ra~s replaced w~.Ch double-wall certified ~ approved storage ta~s ~ ~n cmj[mC~on ~ue ail ra~s to d~s~nsor p~p~ng doubie-wail or f~rglass pipe ~nsra[1.ed ~n acceptable raceways ~rh Ar rh~s r~m we are accepting b~ds fr~ cmtractors for rh~s ~ork. ~Bwever, yo~ agency ~an ~ of assistance to ~ ~n censu!.ra¢~on as to fha re~remnts wo can o~ecr ~n the ~'m~ ~0-15 years. Tn~s in~o~C:[or: 5s vital to our orga~izaCZon, e[em~nar~ d~uble e~nses. Yot~ ~ow tiiis ~ of ~mrk can be e:d;rer~ly cosely. ~mck J~rsort O~mer Holden Truck Plaza 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, Californi~ 93308 Phone 327-5781 (805) September 23, 1985 This agreement is between Chuck Jimerson dba: Holden Truck Plaza and Cal Cheek dba: Oildale Ready Mix. Oildale Ready Mix agrees to accept approximately 60 truck loads of diesel sand from Holden Truck Plaza. This material will be transported to Oildale Ready Mix's batch plant. The location of this batch plant is on ~dmondson Pump Plant Road. o. The material will be stock piled and used as asphalt batch material at the rate of 5% per batch. This blending process will ensure Oildale Ready Mix of quality asphalt without any drop in quality. The material will then be sent out to various A/C paving operations within Oildale Ready Mix's effective operating range. The 60 truck loads of material will be used within a 30 day time period. '. Oildale Ready Mix will provide Ann Boyce of the Kern County Environmental Health Department with a bill of laden for each load removed from Holden Truck Plaza and transported to the batch plant. It is understood that no EPA number will be required for this material and that Oildale Ready Mix will transport all of the diesel sand removed' by excavation at the Holden Truck Plaza site. Cal Cheek dba: Chuck Jimerson dba: Oildale Ready Mix Holden Truck Plaza The terms and conditions outlined herein are acceptable by me. Kern County Health Department Permits # Facility Name Plot Diagram Plot plan notes Yes No 1. All new and existing tanks located on plot plan? 2. Does tank product correspond to product labels on {~/ plot plan? 3. Was there no modifications identified which were I~/ IZ{ not depicted on the plot plans? If "No" described 4. Are monitoring wells secure and free of water and product in sump? 5. Is piping system pressure, suction or gravity? RATORIES ]. ], ~1,1tl, I1~. CHilli. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. I]30e PHONE 317-4111 McNabb Construction Company Date Reported: 9/13/85 2616 Stark Street Date Received: 9/10/85 Bakersfield, California 93305 Laboratory No.: 15706 to ~5713 Attention: Bryan L. McNabb As Received Basis Sample Sample Freon Extraction for Benzene No. Description Hydrocarbons, ppm WEt/WEt. ppm, wgt./w~t. 15706 West Tank South end 2' 7835 1. 15707 West Tank North end 2' 53 less'than 1. 1~708 West Tank South end 6' 3365 .less than 1. 15709 West Tank North end 6' 44 less than 1. 15710 East Tank South end 2' 2133 less than 1. '15711 East Tank North end 2' less than 1 less than 1. 15712 East Tank South end 6' 4347~ 1.6 15713 East Tank North end 6' 197 less than 1. Permit Oues ti onnai re Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with .payment: For PERMIT # ~ "' ~ .... _~ 1. Send all information to Owner at the address listed on invoice (if O~ner is different than Operator, it wlil be O~ner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information). 2. Send all information to Owner' at following corrected address: 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit Owner ). O~ b,~ o Permit Application Checklist Facility Name ~ !~ ~ '~,~ ~ ~ Facility Address 377S Applicatio~'Category: ~ Standard Design Motor Vehicle Fuel Exemption Design (Secondary Containment) (Non-Secondary Containment) Approved ~ Permit Application Form Properly Completed Deficiencies: 3 Copies of Plot Plan Depicting: _~- - Property lines _-~ ' ' Area encompasse.~-'~-~mi-~im~m ~0~--~foot r~dius around tank(s) and -- piping ._-'~j All tank(s) identified by a number a'~d product to be stored __ ~_~ Adequate scale (minimum 1"=16'0" in detail) ~ . /~"' 2Z~'~ North arrow _~'C~ All structures within 50 foot radius of tank(s) and piping L~cation and iab~in~g of all product piping and dispenser islands L~.)~ Environmental sensitivity ~ata inciudfng:'i *Depth to first groundwater at site *Any domestic or agricultural w t~.'( well within 100 feet of tank(s) and piping *Any surface water in unlined conveyance within 100 feet of tank(s) an,~ pi?lng *All utility lines within 25 feet of tank(s) and piping (telephone, electrical, water, sewage, gas, leach lines, seepage pits, drainage systems) *Asterisked items: appropriate documentation if permittee seeks a motor vehicle fuel exemption ~fom §econdary containment Comments: Approved 3 Copies of Construction Drawings Depicting: · J.~, -- ~-{de View of Tank Installation with Back~ill, Raceway(s), 'Secondary Containment and/or Leak Monitoring System in Place Top Vi~w 'oF Tank Instaliati6n with Raceway(s), Secondary Containment and/or Leak Monitoring System in Place Materials List .(indicating those used in the ~construction): Tank(S)Product Pi p~~~,' ~,'~__%,~.._~o~,~j~_~'g~ Raceway(s) ' ' ~ ~ Secondary Containme~ ~' ~V~ ~h~k~ ~J~9~ 5,'~ Leak Detector(s). ~ ~~~/l&'- ~7 Overfill Protection ~r~. ~$~m_ ~VI~-O~ ~J F~)~ . ~as o~ Vapo~ De~e~o~(s) A~d i t i~na'l: Documentation Of Product performance Additional Comments Reviewed By Date SITE INSPECTION: Approved Disapproved Comments: Inspector Date Standard Compliance Che Facility: ~ !~_.~ ~-~ ~c. k ~'~- CT ~ Equipment to be installed: ~ Tank(s), ~'D ft. of []suction ~pressurized piping Req'd Approved ~' ~'~- '~'~9 Primary Containment ~Fiberglass (FRP) Make & ~odel ~Fiberglass-clad steel Make & Model ~m~ ~,,~ ~Uncoated steel Make & Model ~Other: Make & Model Comment: Additional: Inspection: 'J~ ~-~ Secondary Containment of Ta~(s) ~Double-walled tank(s) Make & Model ~Synthetic liner Make & Model ~Lined concrete vault(s) Sealer used ~Other Type Make & Model Comment: ~dditional: Inspection: Secondary containment-volume at least 100% of pr'imary tank volume(s) Comment: ~dditional: Inspection: Secondary containment volume for more than one tank contains 150% of volume of largest primary cont~inemnt, or 10% of aggregate primary volume, whichever is greater Comment: Additional: Inspection: secondary containment open to rainfall must a-comodate 24 hour rainfall Total Volume Comment: ~' Req'd Approve__d Additional: Inspection: v/ '~C. ?'~ Secondary containment is product-comPatible Product ~o lJ' m.~ ~ Documentation Comment: - D [ ~J Additional: Inspection: Annular space liquid is compatible with product Product Annular liquid Comment: Additional: Inspection: Primary Containment of Piping [~Fiberglass piping Size & Make ~'/~,~ ~.~, Coated steel piping Size & Make [-]Uncoated steel piping Size ~Other Comment: Additional: Inspection: Secondary Co'n'tainment Of Piping  Double-walled pipe Size & Make ~' Synthetic liner in trench Size & Make ~Other Comment: Additional: Inspection: Corrosion Protection Piping & ttimgs ~;I [[]Electrical isolation'- Comment: Additional: Inspection: Manufacturer-Approved Backfill for Tanks & Piping Type _~d~.~ Comment: , Req'd Approved Additional: Inspection: Tank(s) Located .No Closer Than 10 Feet to Building(s) Comments: 2~ 7-~ Additional: Inspection: ./ Complete Monit0r'ing System Monitoring device within secondary containment: ~Liquid level indicator(s) ~]Liquid used []]Thermal conductivity sensor(s) DPressure sensor(s) [']Vacuum gauge D']Sump(s) DGas or vapor detector(s) [~Manual inspection & sampling [qVisual inspection , ~Other D~]~ ~,~ ~ ~~,~ Comments: O 0 d- --~ Additional: Inspection: Other Monitoring Periodic tightness testing Method Pressure-reducing line ,leak ~etector(s) Comment: Additio'na'l: Inspection: Overfill Protection ~Tape float gauge(s) ~Float vent valve(s) ~ ~j~)~8~ DCapacitance sensor(s) /2]High level alarm(s) ~Automatic shut-off control(s) ~Fill box(es) with 1 ft.3 volume ~Operator controls with visual level monitoring ot~er Comment: 3 Extra Inspections/Reinspections/Consultations Da te: Put pose: Comment: Time Utilized Da te: Purpose: Comment: Time Utilized Da te: Purpose: Comment: Time Utilized Da te: Purpose: Comment: Time Utilized Invoice'Date: Total Time: InspectOr Date: PAGE NO. ~zt~ ~' ~ . , .'~ I,/~! ? MILEAGE I -- ' - , - N JOB NO. ~ TAXABLE NON-TAXABLE -S- ~NO. MATERIAL ~ SELL COST SELL QOST ' .h.l ......... ., V39. ~ .... ~, ~; ~: ~4 .... i ~~"~ ~/,~~. __ ~'~"-' ,; at FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711 SeoL 26, 19 85 From MODERN WELO~N'G?~:M~Y:,:"INC, .,:. :' ' {Mall ~r ~tre~ ~rm~ of ~m~ Destinetion__ Bak~rsf ~ld _State CA Coun~ ........ Delive~ Addr~ ' ~oufe ....  Deliver;ag Carrier Car or Vehicle In~;fials.~ No. Kind of Package, Description of Articles. Special ,w~o~' Cless Ch~k"? ~ ~. ~ * ~ ~:~  (Su~ to ' , ,, : Order. cad must at FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711 Se: 19 85 From MODE~ WELDi~' ",.". ; . -.. Consigned to. ELW Equipman~.~_~d Oesfinotlon Bakersfield ..... Sfafe_..~A ....... Coun~_~ Del~e~ ~ddres~ (~ To be filled ~n only ~hen Roufe Delivering Carrier Car or Vehicle. ..... ' ~ ' MODERN WELDING COMPANY, INC. S~p~r, Per fd;t/~ w 1700 Flower Street COUNTY HEALTH DEPART'ML~I' HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Lean M Hebef~on, M.D. Telephone (805) ~61-3836 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH May 21, 1985 Chuck Jimerson, Owner Holden Truck Center 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 Dear Mr. Jimerson: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter, notifying this department of your intentions to remove the tanks located at 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, Cali fornia. Kern County Ordinance Code ~G-3941 requires that all underground tanks be permitted. Since you have ~otified this department that you intend to abandon/close this facility/tank you must submit the enclosed documents within 60 days for review. The tanks must either be properly abandoned, or be subject to all permit, inspection, and monitoring requirements of this Department. I have enclosed an abandorment permit application and our requirements regarding tank removal. A permit to abandon will be issued after the submitted application has been approved. The permit will enable you to get necessary approval from the local Fire Department for tank abandonment. Should you have any further questions .concerning the enclosed applications, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, j~Canas~'~ Environmental HeaIth Speciaiist I Hazardous Substances Management Program JC: aa Enclosure DISTRICT OFFICES Delano , Lamont . Lake laabella . MoJava . RId~ecreet . Shatter . BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF 3cc. GROUP A E I H B R M DIV. 1 2 4 5 :OR NEW ALTERATION ADDITION' DEMOLISH REPAIR MOVE BUILDING ~ BUILDING BUILDING Description ~-'" [ ['~' Valuation $ Total Fee ~ ~~- .... ~ Permit ~ Description ~o~ No. ' Valuation $ Total Fee 0 ~ ciw ) , Valuation $'-- Total Fee ~,,,..~,~. ~ MECHANICAL ~lan Check co~,,,c,or ~L ~Q ~ ~4 ~.l ~% Description , 'ermit Con~c~o~ ' ~ ci~ Valuation $ Total. Fee ~ Description ~c ~ Permit ~ z I ~ ~ Total Fee ~ ~ Valuation $ Z 0 _u ~ MOBILEHOME Permit Installation Permit Awning Permit State Fee Permit Recordin~ Fee Total Fee ~ SPECIAL BONDS Pe~it Total Fee Pe~ission i~ he,eby g~entad to do the ~ descried he.in, provided luch TOTAL FEE work con~o~s ~o [he term~ of applicationl and planl and sCecificettonl hie i~ lhis office. Receipt of money foe total fee ~wn hereon il WHITE~ Aoolicant YELLOW~ Building Depe~ment PINK~Coun~ GOLDENR0~Aud~r ~"' ....'. ....... :.,~. .. .. 2 ea · 1/3 H~ Red3acket submersible pumps ~ ..".~;"". ' 4 ea 116 Red~acket leak detectors ·' ~....... r{.'.~ '..' .- · .. '' "' ':~ 8 ea 24" X 24" steel manways with covers " '":' :' 3 ea k[ 1~ spare elements · , :...,~.. ..... . 2 ea Inlet and outlet gauges 9 ea 1~" Safety ~mpacg valves ""~ 2 ea 4" X .12' ~lum~num drop tube, cap and adapters :. 't' 3 ea' X 24' steel ~sland form AUTOMOTIVE ~D ~RVICE STATION EQUIP~NT HOISIS e HYDRAULIC JACKS · AUlD LIFTS - t UBE EQUIP~NI COMPRE~ORS * GAGES' * MEIERS * JACK, STANDS * PU~S AND METERS - T~LS - 11RE EQUlPMEN~ FI~INGS * VALVES ~D NOZZLES INDUSTRI~EQUIP~NT SALES~D SERVICE -- STE~CL~NERS - HOSE * HOISIS * V-BELTS * FILTERS H~D~U~'~QFI~INGS ~TERS WATER * OIL · CH~ICAL . August 16, 1985 ' I HEREBY AUTHORIZE ...... ..R..L...W.._E..q..u..i_p..m...e_n...t....C...o..m...p..a...n..y.. ............ : ................................................ to make the following change from the work as originally set/orth in the plans and specifications: ..I_ ..... -F..u..r...n..i..~.h...~r).d...i.~.~a].~...twa...(2~-1~`~.Q~...and...~w~....(2)...~Z.~...ga].Z~n...tat~ks...~st~acL.~ f ......... fQ. ur.-l.~)-lO,(]llQ.~a]].ao,..Y-ankS-ax..per--caatr, act..da.ted..Augus ~...&,..1985 ....... ADD..~$..4845. O0 .Ii ..... [ll~];all...c oadui.t..an ~t..r..i.s erm_far....f,, t ur.e...II~ ................................................................ ~.'.'..] .......... .... Iank..ka~]....Sya~em....~ ....................................................................................................... ~..$_1450. O0 I AUTOMOTIVE ® INDUSTRIAL ° PETROLEUM ,'...: .;, . .,' ~:~ ~ <.". ;..~ '~.;,..~;.? . .... r.,~.,',..,.,?~'.-~:~,~.,~.,.?.:..?.:~ August 16, 1985 · · · .t .~ '; ... ;~'.' .. ¢ -1 · ~'.. :"'. ," ';'..~ ~', ~';';:~:7 :~,.~,,y~L..R t,'.?,. ?.',,,;,..'~.~.~' ~;.¢.~.~,*,': '.'~? Holden Truck P1 aza ..... : .... ".'-"~' '.'~'"" -,::;:" ' ~:~,~:"~ - ,. t, ' ,..',..'.' ?:.. ~m,.,.-',~'.,,=, 3735 Pierce Ro~d - ,: · .. ' ~,~. =%..-.u..':' '~. :~ Bakersft eld, Ca11 fornt a 93308 t,:.... :L..:.::, .:.? [~=:L:..;:?~ ~'.:~::"~i A~N: Chuck dimerson .... '~. ,~:':?.}"::7.'::':?,~.::':~.~SUBd: dob change to contract dated August 6 1985 . · . · ..' · ~ ..,-,~j~;".,.".. ., [ : ~, }~:: ."::::"~..'.;~?.'(":¢~:;.':.'.~'..'C"'.'.'~ I Furnish and install t~ (2) 10,000 and . .........,, two (2) 12,000 gallon tanks instead of . four (4) 10,000 gallon tanks ~D $ 4845.00 · ' . "..':~'..'.:.i.," :.~'" ]~ .~nstall condu~t and r~sers for future TLS Tank Level System ADD $ 1450.00 ",' ..' *.-~ ','~ *,2.~;.~ ~%.:..~,~. h~,~.. , ,.. ;.~ ~ ;, .~.-; ,.': .~..'. ,.'~. ~:::. :,,?q~;~. '~5~'?::' '.,c:~:u~ dohn Paxton ~,.. ~ .. ...,:% ..... .~.~.~...~.4.~..:.~ '". '~"" .' '. · .'.'~.r'.~" '~'~*. * -".."2 e~' '~;' ~ "~'.".' -.....?:. ,,. ~ . ?'..'..~ ... . ~ .~5~ ~-'~.;~-,.~. ...:pt . ~/ ': """ ;.~ ~'~k"'" .~'~?"'~'~¢'; "F ;,,, '. '.,m '~" ,..?"',' "~ .. '~ ~ '. · - - ;'2:': ?. ~.~.'t:' ~t; - ~. . -... ,~. .. . ?~.,-~ ,.. ~.,. ,. ::,i., ..... :..~.,t,%..,.. ':' '= .'--%: . .~' ' 'U ~:'.'.', ',;;:~::.:~':] ' · .... .~ - . .~;..;.. -,'.~ .?;.:...~. l":' ': ...:.' ,;'. :,.. ~.: .,.'? ~,.:.~ ;(' ::t ,,:. ',~ [. · .,. .... :.<.-...~?~.;.,~.:,: '..,:~ :. . ......,? .,,...'.. .~.. (' . ' ~ ' '2 ': ': ' "~ "': ' A~OMOTIVE AND ~RVlCE STATION EQUIP~NT HOISTS ~ HYDRAULIC JACKS * AUTO LIFTS ~ LUBE [QUIP~NT~ BA~ERYCHARG[RS CO~RE~ORS * ',GAGES ' 'METERS FI~INGS ' VALVES AND NOZZLES INDUSTRIAL EQUIP~NT ~L~ AND SERVICE -- S~E~,CLEANERS ' HOSE ' HOISTS * V-BELTS * FILTERS · REGULATORS " LU[~CAIC;RS HYD~ULIC HO~ ~D'F~ING~~ERS WATER- OIL · CHEMI~ :'AJJIC~DTIV~i' INDUSTRIAl. · ~TROL~UM at 3775 Pierce Road, Bakersfield for E." Intercom s~stem F. Tank leak de:ection :' ~. $ 43,480.00 : .. tanks, installation of new t~ks,.-piping, I e + I '~ m ~ m:' m''' ~ i 4 J 'and concrete work. $ 47,520.00 -'~,-. ' ....... 'r'. ............ ":"' C~NGE DATED AUGUST 16, 1985 AUTO~TI~ ~ ~VI~ STATION EQtJIP~NT HOISTS · HYDRAULIC JACKS · AUTO tl~S · LuBE EQUIP~NT · BA~ERYCHARGERS c~RE~ · ~GES - METERS JACK STANDS · PU~D~TE~ · 1~ · 11EEQUIPIt~T * ~D PU~ * TANKS FI~INGS * V~VES AND ~LES INDUSTR~L~IP~NT ~LES~D~RVICE · ST~MC~NERS · ~ * HOISTS · V-~LTS · FILTERS · REGU~TORS * LUBRI~.TO~S Furnish and install two (2) 12,000 gallon and two (2) 10,000 gallon tanks instead of four(4) 10,000 gallon tanks, ADD $ 6,295.00 Sincerely, John Paxton Sales Engineer .~. -..~... JP/jb Auto Ti~e Rebuilding Plan~s ~ Amunitton ~ Match;;~ .... Auto Wrecking ~ Fla~ble Finishes ~ Place of Asembly Junk Yard ~ Spray Finishing ~ Tent Waste Handling ~ Fl~apl~ Liquids ~ Welding & Cutting Cellulose Nitrate ~ Garage ~ Airport - Heliport Combustible Fibres ~ Hazardous Chemicals ~ Organic Coating Con,pressed Gas { ] Liquefied Pet Gas ~ High Piled Stock Oust Explosion }lazard ~ Lumber Yard Explosives ~ Magnesium This card Is to remain ~n a consplcl{ms place near the installation until final inspection is made and approved, i~RKS: Final Inspection: 19 Inspector: ~/~/ KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT' PERMIT ~050037B UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY FA ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS: Truck Cent: Chuck Jimerson · tee Road .~/ 3775 Pierce Road "Bakersfield CA 93308 eld ~ ~..~.~ , lXX~ NEW BUSINESS PERMIT EXPIRES August 2, 1986 ~--[. CHANGE OWNERSHIP [ ~ RENEWAL APPROVAL DATE August. 2, 1985 I~ MODIFICATI(/q .... · -'-~. 151 OTHER APPROVED BY ~__j~.z~C~3 Joe Canas POST THIS PERMIT ON PREMISES CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Note: Ail pertinent equipment and materials used in this construction are subject to identification and approval by the Permitting Authority prior i) to construction. This permit is issued contingent upon guaranteed compliance with the guidelines as determined by the Permitting Authority. All construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. 3. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with 48 hours advance notice. 4. All underground metal product piping, fittings and connections must be wrapped to a minimum 20-mil thickness with corrosion-preventive, gasoline-resistant tape or otherwise protected from corrosion. 5. Construction inspection .record is included with permit given to Permittee. This card must be posted at jobsite prior to initial inspection. Permittee must contac~ Permitting Authority and arrange for each group of required inspections numbered as per instructions on card. Generally, inspections w~ll be made of: a. Tanks and backfill b. Piping system with secondary containment c. Overfill protection and leak detection/monitoring d. Any other inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority 6. Spark testing (35,000 volts) required at site prior to installation of tank(s). .Test(s) must be certified by the manufacturer, and a copy of test certifications supplied to the Permitting Authority. '7. All equipment and materials in this construction must' be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. 8. No product shall be stored in tank(s) until approval is granted by Permitting A~thority -,:,9. Monitoring requirements for this facility will be described on final "Permit to Oper~ate". ........ ":'" ' ~**"*.T E I ~.-'X_ I~* '-.*' PLAN A?P:~OVED Bakersfield, Cc;!;::r.-.:d. 93305 0 ~" ' /- Fho~a X~  ~ Bakersfield Fire Dep~ 'RAZARDOUS MATERIALS DlgffSION .. 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~O (805) 326-3970 / ' RECEIVED ~,~ UNDERGROUND TANK QUEd*iRE I. FACILITY/SITE No. OF TANKS ~ HAZ M4% ~IV. DBA OR FACILIW NAME NAME ~ OPE~TOR ~ BOX TO INDICATE ~ CORPORATION  DIVIDUAL ~PARTNE~HIP ~L~ALAGENCYDIS~ ~COUNW AGENCY ~STATE AGENCY ~FEDE~L AGENCY EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PEIMAE~ EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDAR~ opflonol  : NAME (~S[ FI~ No. WITH AE~ CODE DAYS: NAME (~ST, FI~ PHONE . WITH ~R~ CODE ~--5~ PHONE NIGHTS: NAME (~ST, FIRS~ / PHON~ ~. WITH ~R~ CODE J NIGHTS: NAME (~ST, FI~ PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE I1. PROPER~ OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STRE~DRESS ~ ~ BOX ~NDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY CIW~~~ME ~ ~ ~~ $~ ZIPCODE ~ PHONE No. WIIH A~ CODE Ill. TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR STREET~ ~ADDRESS ~ BOX ~DIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY ~~ ~~~ TO INDICATE ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ COUNW AGENCY ~ FEDERAL AGENCY OWNER'S DATE VOLUME PRODUCT IN TANK No. INSTALLED STORED SERVICE 1 oo, Y/N Y/N SPILL RESPONSE PLAN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA(S) FOR HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA Submitted November 26, 1991 1. Should a spill occur within the secondary containment area(s) a prompt method of removal will occur no latter than 30 days from the date that the spill occurs. A. As the secondary containment areas are maintained clean at all times the fuel product (Hazardous Substance) would be transferred to the underground tank storage upon detection. 1. The fuel must be measured to maintain proper inventory reconciliation. 2. Should the fuel be contaminated with water an outside contractor would be contracted for proper recycling and/or disposal methods. 3. Source of spill must be determined, Clark's Petroleum and our in house staff to work in conjunction to correct and abate situation. B. PolyAlert alarm sounding procedure. 1. Within 24 hours secondary tank containment inspection must occur. 2. In the event of a diesel or fuel release into the secondary tank containment area, the primary fuel tank must be emptied immediately. Our fuel transport truck contractor is to be contacted and the fuel would be shipped to another off site fuel holding tank. 3. City of Bakersfield (Hazardous Materials Division), Modern Tank Welding (the tank manufacturer), Clark's Petroleum, and the appropriate insurance company would be contacted as needed for abatement procedures and compliance issues. C. Chuck Jimerson is the owner and person responsible for authorizing any work necessary under the response plan. * Note: Attached is a copy of the pollution insurance coverage and carder identification. ' INSURAN : A emk ' BINDER ISSUEDATE(MM/DD/YY) THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM PRODUCER COMPANY BINDER NO. ~ EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION .... DATE ~. TIME DATE TIME Sedgwick James o~ Pa., Inc. ~ : 1~01: AM X 12:01Ab Haee i s b ueg, PA 1 7 105 ~THIS BINDER IS ISSUED TO EXTEND COVERAGE IN THE ABOVE NAMED ~ COMPANY PER EXPIRING POLICY NO: CODE SUB-CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS~VEHICLESIPROPERTY (Including Location) ~,sU~ED POLLUTION LIABILITY Holden Teuck Plaza c/o A~ Insurance Agencg, Inc P. O. Box , TYPE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE/FORMS AMOUNT DEDUCTIBLE COINSUR. PROPERTY} CAUSES:!OFLOSS ! ~ i~ h .~ /-,,~~ i BASIC BROAD~ SPEC i GENERAL LIABILITY ! ~ GENERAL AGGREGATE i $ ; COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROD. -- COMPIOPS AGGREGATE i $ CLAIMS MADE,~ OCCUR PERSONAL & ADVTSNG. INJURY $ · ' ~; ' '" ! RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: MED. EXPENSE (Any one person) $ AUTOMOBILE. : ALL VEHICLES L~ iSCH~ VEHIC~ ~ .' CSL LIABILITY BI PERs/Accio $ ~ GARAGE ......... ~ ~ ' (~ ' ~ UM AUTO P.~S~CAL OAaA~E ~ ~ ALL VEH CLES ~ ......... ~ SC ~ULED V ~ ACV '~ COLLISION DED. J '. ~ STATED AMOUNT : $ ~ OTC DED: ; OTHER EX~ESS LIABILITY EACH AGGREGATE SELF-INSURED OCCURRENCE , RETENTION ~ UMBREL~ FORM . ~ OTHER THAN UMBREL~ FORM RETRO DATE FOR C~IMS MADE: ~ STATUTORY WORKER'S COMPENSATION : ; $ (EACH ACClDEN~ AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY $ (DISEASE-POLICY LIMI~ $ (DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE) SPECIAL CONDITIONS/RES~BICTIONS/OTHER Coverage subjecg ~o agreed upon conditions-and exclusion~ Limits $1, OOO, OOO Each Occurence Deductible $10, OOO $1, OOO, OOO Aggregate Claims made Retwo da~e: 11-12-~0 ~NAME ~{A~D~ESS':,: '" , "~ MORTGAGEE ADDITIONAL INSURED " ~ LOSS PAYEE 20- 30 HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 November 26, 1991 City of Bakersfield Hazardous Material Division 2130 "O" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Aofd .... . Attention: Joe A. Dunwoody I received your letter dated November 6, 1991 in my in basket on Nov. 25, 1991. The manner in which it is written concerns me. Sometime around the middle of the year, June or July, I received a letter stating that the underground tank storage for Bakersfield was being shifted from the county to the city. That same communication stated that any changes would be communicated at a later date. The first letter and the one I just received are the only two communications I have received regarding this issue. The underground tank questionnaire and the segment form is filled out and attached. Kern County Environmental Health has all of our plans for the construction of our underground tank storage that took place in 1985. I do not understand what has occurred between the agencies. Would you bring me up to speed? Additionally, the minimum requirements for monitoring programs and spill response plans are attached to this letter to comply with Section 2632 of Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16. Should you require any additional information or have any questions please contact me by writing or calling me at 327-5790. Ask for Chuck or Midge. Sincerely, PERMIT ~ FACILITY NA : NUMBER OF TANKS AT THE SITE: ................. , .......................... ~]V. SEN$I?IVIT¥ ......... EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(PRIMARY): NAME: PHONE NUMBER: EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(SECONDARY): NAME: PHONE NUMBER: TANK OWNER INFORMATION: NAME: ................................................................ : ................................................................................................................................ ADDRESS: PHONE NO.: TANK CONTENTS: TANK ~ MANUFACTURER YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CONTENTS i TANK CONSTRUCTION: TANK ~ TYPE(dw, sw, sec.¢ont.) MATERIAL INT. LINING; CORROSION PROT. LEAK DETECTION: TANKS: VISUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS VADOSE ZONE MONITORING WELLS U-TUBES WITH LINERS U-TUBES WITHOUT LINERS VAPOR DETECTOR LIQUID SENSORS CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS PRESSURE SENSORS IN ANNULAR SPACE LIQUID'RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS IN U-TUBES, MONITORING WELLS, OR ANNULAR ....................... NONE ............... ~NKNOWN ............................. OTHER ............................................................................................................... PIPING INFORMATION: TANK ~ SYSTEM T~.PE CONSTRUCTION ~ MATERIAL (SUC,~P~_~ES~.),GRAV.) (SW,DW,LINED TR) t I ~' FLOW RESTRICTING LEAK DETECTORS FOR PRESSURIZED LEAK DETECTION: PIPING: ...~ ........ PIPING MONITOR NG SUMP NITH RACEWAY SEALED CONCRETE RACENAY HALFCUT COMPATIBLE PIPE RACENAY SYNTHETIC LINER RACEWAY NONE UNKNOWN OTHER Holden Truck Plaza 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 327-5790 ' January 7, 1991 '<" '"~ .~ TO: Amy E. Green, R.E.H.S. Environmental Heal~ Se~ices Dep~ent Reso~ce Management Agency 27~ "M" S~et, Suim 3~ B~ersfield, CA 93301 ~: Request ~t~ December 27,1990 De~ Amy, Enclosed is the quesfionn~m that we ~scussed Fdday, Janu~ 4th, 1991. I attached a copy of the project file for our under~ound storage facility. ~e info~ation provided will support the info~afion that we ~scussed about the materials and manufacturers used for cons~cfion of the under~ound tanks. Should you have ~y questions please contact me. Again, thank you for your courtesy and professional attitude. Sincerely, Chuck Jim~  Environmental Health Services Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT s'r~ McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR Air Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE II! W~LLU~M J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Development Services Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Underground Storage Tank Owners DATE: December 27, 1990 RE: Deadline for upgrade requirements for your underground tank facility Dear Sir/Madam: Our records indicate that you own at least one underground storage tank which has fuel distributed through pressurized product lines. Recent changes in state and federal regulations require that all pressurized piping must be equipped with an automatic line leak detection system by December 22, 1990, and tightness tested annually. These requirements are more fully described in the code of Federal Regulations, part 280 and 281; California's Health and Safety' Code as modified in October 1989; and Ca;ifornia's Draft Regulations for underground storage tanks. In addition the equipment that is to be installed at your facility must be able to alert the owner or operator of the presence of a leak, by restricting or shutting off the flow of hazardous substance through the piping, or by triggering an audible or visual alarm. It must detect leaks of three gallons or more per hour at 10 pounds per square inch line pressure within one hour, as certified by the manufacturer. Your facility may require modification to remain in compliance with local and federal guidelines for operation of the underground storage tank system. If you have installed automatic line leak detection equipment, please take a few minutes to complete the questionnaire enclosed, and return it to the Environmental Health Services Department within 14 days. If you have not installed such equipment, you may obtain information from service station equipment companies on the cost and types of equipment available which will meet the performance standard described. Verification of comPliance will be evaluated during the course of routine annual inspections. The Department is currently workingon-the final permit requirements for your facility which will specify monitoring alternatives based on your environmental setting; those permits and their conditions will be issued next year. The Department is currently working on updating our local ordinance to meet the minimum guidelines specified within the new state regulations, currently in draft form. As in this letter we will advise you in writing of requirements which will affect your facility, and assist you in obtaining information to comply with those requirements. Please continue prompt payment of permit fees and feel free to call the Kern County Environmental Health Permitting and Inspections Program if you have any questions. Sincerely, ..~ .... f...' / Hazardou/s/s~aterials S~eciali~,t Hazardous Materials Management Program AEG:ch green\dea, dline 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 TYPE OF INSTALLATION ( ) 1. In-Tank Level Sensor ~,2. Leak Detector ( Fill Box CONTACT PERSON 1. IN TANK LEVEL SENSORS of Tanks q List By Tank ID Number ! Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer 2. LEAK DETECTORS Number of Tanks q List By Tank ID Name of System Manufacturer & Model Number Contractor/Installer FILL BOXES Number of Tanks Ltst By Tank ID Name of System Manufacturer a Model Number Contractor/Installer · 20t"~O $0. tJ~O~ Av~ . JOHN PAXTON 8AK[RSr,EL~. CA. 93307 July 11, 1988 Holdens Truck Plaza 3775 Pierce Road Bakersfield .Ca 93308 Attention: Mr. Chuck Jimerson Subject: Underground Gasoline and Diesel Tanks Dear Chuck: This is in response to your recent inquiry as to the integrity of the system we installed for you at your facility in 1985. As you know, the rules and regulations were new to all of us, even the regulatory agencies. We all worked together and learned together, and .I remember that from the beginning, even though price for the project was important to you as a business man, it was not the only governing factor, as it was your desire to meet all the required regulations, and those that we could anti ci pate. Althoogh it is approaching four years since we installed your system, you have monitoring equipment which is not yet required. All of the equipment you purchased was of the best quality available. The 1 l__steel con.s.truction .wi~t~oa~tj_[lg_on_the outer_ta_nk. This coating must '~ndergo a 35,000volt holiday te§t to insure its integrity against pin holes, and it carries a 30 year warranty against corrosion. Between the walls of these tanks are Pollulert leak detection ~ t~hat will detect a liquid, either hydrocarbons or water and if that happens l_t...s~gnals a visual alarm and an audible a~l, 92_m_....t_.o__t.h e _J~u_i l__dj_n.g .__- ..................................................... ~-~' Holdens Truck Plaza Mr. Chuck Jimerson . July 11, 1988 Page Two In addition to this protection, all of the underground piping is_ ~fiberglass, UL approved for fuel insta~atl~-~s, and all product suppl3l'lines are sleeved in PVC ~rom the d~pense'rs ~ac~k~o~fdu~l p'iplng sumps .at the tanEs for visual monitoring. I personally checked thes~-'-f~6'~d--fOUnd them to be free of ' gasoline or diesel fuel. To anticipate future requirements, we installed provisions for a tank level gauging system to' be installed later if wanted or re- quired. It is our opinion that you have one of the finest and safest systems that can be had, and we know you monitor it closely. We are enclosing copies of documents that may not .be readily available in your files. I do hope that this information will satisfy your q)~estions. If not, olease contact me. Si ncerel y, axton / Sales Engineer RLW EQUIPMENT Contractors LicenSe #294074