HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-12/19/90~ FiRE I~'PARTM£NT
:- BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
In Conformity with provisions:of pertinent ordinances, codes and/ar 'regulations, application is made
Power ,'L~t~.: .... - .....3~18 ~Pierce Road
tO display, store, {nstotlj use, Operate, sel{ or hanqle materiels or processes involving or creating con-
. ditlOnS deemed hazardOus tO. life-or 'property as follows: . - .
......................... ! Bakersfield, CA 93301
FACILITY NAME ~_~t,,.~P fl(~'~'~A~L ("%O_,,'v~"~-P_. BUSINESS I.D. "0. 215-000
FACILIW ADDRESS ~l~ ~'~/~ - ClW ~~~ ZIP CODE
FACILI~ PHONE NO. ~ ~
INSPECTION DATE ~ P~
TIME IN ____ ~~.1 .~~ ~ ,na~le
ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP
/ EQU EMENTS no,
ld. State Sur~arge ~ ~ ~ '
le, Sate~nt of Fi~lal R~sibil~ Su~
lf. W~en Contm~ E~sts ~n ~ & O~ to O~mte UST
~. ~lid O~mting Pete
2b. Approv~ Wraen Ro~ine Uonit~ng Pr~ure ~~ ~
2c. Una~ho~ Relea~ R~n~ Plan~ /
~. Tank lnt~ T~t in Last12 Months / __~
3b. Pr~u~ Piping Int~r~ Test in La~ 12 M~ths / "
~. Suction Piping ~ghtn~s T~t in Last 3 Yearn ~ ~ %~* ,~ ~.~
~. Gmv~ FI~ Piping ~ghtn~ T~t in ~st 2 Yearn
3f. Dai~ ~s~l Mon~ng of Su~ion Pr~ Piping
~. ~nual Invento~ R~ncil~tion Each ~
~. Annual Invento~ R~iliati~ Statement Subm~ / ~ ~ t N~-~
~. Metem Calibmt~ Annual~ ~ --' ....
5. W~kN Manual Tank Gauging R~rds f~ Small Tan~
6. Month~ S~tisti~l Invento~ R~iliation R~u~s
7. M~thN A~atic Tank Gauging R~uEs
8. Ground Water MonE~ng
g. ~ Mon~o~ng
10. Continuous IntemtEial MonEoHng f~ D~b~Wall~ Tan~
11. M~hani~l Line Leak D~tom
12. El~tronic Li~ Leak Det~tom
13. Continuous Piping MonE~ng in Sum~
14. A~o~tic Pump Shrift Ca~bil~
15. Annual Maintenan~Calibration of Leak Det~t~ Equi~t
16. Leak Det~tion Equipment and T~t Meth~s List~ in LG-113 Se~
17. Wr~en R~ords Maintain~ on S~e
18. Re~ Chang~ in U~g~C~dEions to O~mtin~nEoH~
Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem WEhin ~ Da~
19. Re~ U~h~ Relea~ W~hin 24 H~m
~. Approv~ UST S~tem Re~im and U~rad~
21. R~rds S~ng Cath~ Pmt~ Ins~
~. ~ur~ Mon~oHng Wells
~. Dr~ Tu~
RE-INSPECTION DATE RECEIVED BY:
INSPECTOR: ~ ~ ~ ~/[ OFFICE TELEPHONE No.
FD 1~9
UND~RGRouN~:~bRAGiE TANI~PECTIC' ' ,~"~ . . .ii?iQ.~ Bakersfield Fire Dept.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
FACILITY NAME ~, ~e~ I~r'~}~ {/~O~-~ BUSINESS I.D. No. 215-000 .... /~
FACILIW ADDRESS ~ ~1~ ~'~/~ ~ ClW ~~~ ZIP CODE ~~
FACILI~ PHONE NO. ~ ~ ~
TIME IN ~ In~ ~te nst ~te
INSPECTION ,
s~X s~. s~.
ROUTINE
/ REQUIREMENTS - ~
ld. State Surcharge Pa~ ~ ~
~,. st,t~ o~ Fi~,~ ,,~,ibii~ Sum~ ~ ·
lf. W~en Contm~ E~s~ ~n ~er & O~mt~ ~ O~mte UST ~ ,.
~. ~lid O~mting Pete ~
2b. Ap~ov~ Wr~en Ro~ine MonRoHng Pr~ure ~ ~.~ ~ /
2C. Una~ho~ Re~ Res~n~ Plan ' ~
~. Tank Int~ T~t in ~st 12 Months ~
3b. Pr~u~ Pipi~ Int~ri~ Test in Last 12 M~ths ~
~. 8ucti~ Piping ~ghtn~ l~t in La~ ~ Yea~ ~
~. Omv~ Fl~ Piping ~ghtn~ T~t in ~ 2 Y~m /
~. T~ R~uRs Subm~ Within ~ Da~ ~
al. Dai~ ~sual MonRodng o~ 8u~i~ Pr~ Piping ~
~. Manual Invent~ R~il~tion Each M~h ~
~. Annual Invento~ R~iliati~ 8tateme~ 8u~ ~
~. Metem Calibmt~ Annually /
5. W~Hy Manual Tank Gauging R~ds f~ S~II Tan~ ,~
6. Monthly Statisti~l Invento~ R~nciliaion R~uRs ~
7. M~thN A~atic Tank Gauging R~uRS ~
8. Grou~ Water ~E~ng /
9. ~ Mon~oring ; ~
10. C~tinuous Intemtitial M~R~ing f~ D~b~Wall~ Tan~~ /
11. M~hani~l Line Leak Det~om ~
12. El~tr~ic Line Leak Det~om /
13. Co~inuous Piping MonR~ng In Sum~
14. A~omatic Pump Shrift Ca~bil~ ~'
15. Annual Malntenan~Calibmtion of Leak Det~ Equi~e~ ~
16. Leak Det~tion Equipment and T~ Metes Lis~ in L~113 Se~ ~
17. Wr~en R~ords Main~in~ on SRe ~
18. Re~ Chang~ In U~g~C~dRi~s to O~mti~R~
Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem WRhin ~ Da~ ~
19. Re~d~ Una~h~ Relea~ WRhin 24 Houm /
~. Ap~ov~ UST S~tem Re,irs a~ U~md~ /
21. R~ds Sh~ng Cath~ Pr~t~ Ins~t~ ~
~. ~ur~ MonRod~ Wells ~
~. Dr~ Tu~ ~
RE-INSPECTION DATE RECEIVED BY:
INSPECTOR: ~, ~.~ ~ OFFICE TELEPHONE No.
FD 1~9
Environmental Health Services Department
RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE M,:Cm.t.~¥, ~.~.lS, OmECTOa
DIRECTOR Air Pollution Control District
DAVID PRICE [] w~ j. RODDY, APCO
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Development Senfices Department
TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
December 19, 1990
Robert Power
Power Machinery Center
P.O. Box 392
Oxnard, CA 93032
SUBJECT: Location : 3818 Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, CA 93308
Known As : Power Machinery Center -
Permit # : 050007
Dear Mr. Power:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the
provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing
conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and
Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you
of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site
which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or
public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further site
characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of
any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Flora Darling (805) 861-3636, Ext. 549.
Hazardous Materials Specialist IV
Hazardous Materials Management Program
CB:ch
darling~mer.let
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636
FAX.: (805) 861-3429
WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT
CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: S SUBSTANCE: 12035
SITE NO: 050007 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y
SITE NAME: POWER MACHINERY CENTER DATE REPORTED: 04/27/89
ADDRESS: 3818 PIERCE RoAD DATE CONFIRMED: 04/27/89
CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 CATEGORY:
SITE STATUS
CASE TYPE: S CONTRACT STATUS: 9 EMERGENCY RESPONSE:
RP SEARCH: S DATE UNDERWAY: 04/27/89 DATE COMPLETED: 04/27/89
PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: 06/08/89 DATE COMPLETED: 08/17/89
ASSESSMENT: C
REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: 10/18/89 DATE COMPLETED: 11/08/89
INVESTIGATION:
REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: 11/08/89 DATE COMPLETED: 12/19/90
POST REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: / / DATE COMPLETED:
ACTION MONITORING:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN:
TAKEN:
RAP REQUIRED: DATE APPROVED:
CASE CLOSED: Y DATE CLOSED: 12/19/90
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: 11/08/89 REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: ED
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
CONTACT NAME: ROBERT POWER SPECIALIST: 15
COMPANY NAME: POWER MACHINERY CENTER SENSITIVITY: EES
ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 392 VERIFIED tX)
CITY/STATE: OXNARD, CA 93032 DATE OF REPORT: 12/21/90
ABANDONMENT #: A900-05 LEAK REPORT: Y
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121 · Bakersfield, California 93308 · (805) 399-5838
February 27, 1990
Kern County Resource Management Agency
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 "M" Street, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn' Flora Darling
Luff Environmental Consulting has prepared the enclosed Site Remediation Summary
on behalf of Power Machinery Center, for their 3818 Pierce Road facility.
Approximately 54 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed from the site. It is
recommended that no further action be required.
The underground tank was removed pursuant to permit #A900-05. All subsequent
work was conducted under permit #050007.
if you have any questions concerning the enclosed plan, please contact me or Kathy
Parker at your convenience.
Kad W. Luff
Principal
Mechanical Engineer
KEP
cc: Robert Power, Power Machinery Center
PM-01
LEC-90-0057
POWER MACHINERY CENTER
SITE REMEDIATION
Introduction
A site characterization of the former underground waste oil tank site at Power
Machinery Center's Pierce Road facility, submitted to the Department of Environmental
Health Services (DEHS) on October 18, 1989, assessed the probable lateral and
vertical extent of the contaminant plume. The remedial action recommended by this
report, and approved by Flora Darling of DEHS, was excavation and disposal of the
contaminated soil at GSX's Lokern facility.
Mitigation Procedures
Kern Backhoe Services and Kern Environmental Services were contracted by Power
Machinery Center to remediate the underground waste oil storage tank site. The
project was started and completed on December 20, 1989. Contaminated soil was
removed to a depth of 12 feet. Approximately 54 cubic yards was transported for
disposal at GSX Services' Lokern facility. Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests are
provided in Attachment I.
Soil Sampling and Analyses
Three soil samples were obtained from the excavation pit. Sample number 1 was
recovered with the backhoe bucket from a depth of approximately 12 feet in the
northwest corner of the excavation. It consisted of a clean, medium to coarse grained
sand with no hydrocarbon odor. Sample number 2 was obtained 12 inches below
grade in the southeast corner of the pit and directly adjacent to the property line
(Figure 2, photograph D1). The sample was composed of silty, fine grained sand with
hydrocarbon staining and a strong hydrocarbon odor. Sample number 3 was
obtained from a thin, faintly odorous, sandy clay layer which appeared to serve as a
barrier to downward migration (Figure 1, photograph C).
Sample numbers 1, 2 and 3 were gravimetrically analyzed for oil and grease pursuant
to EPA Method 9070. Sample number 1 was also analyzed for oil and grease with an
infrared method (EPA Method 413.2). Sediment from the bucket from which sample
number 1 was obtained was field screened with a naphtha-based cutting fluid and did
not yield a cut. Laboratory analyses are provided in Attachment II. Chain of custody
documents are in Attachment III.
Extent of Contamination
Excavation revealed that contaminants, appear to have migrated from_ the a~t
_property onto Power Machine..~.__Center's~arcl_. Photographs taken during the
excavation (Figures 1 and 2~ illustrate the~ contamination present above the
1Color reproductions of photographs were not calibrated properly, resulting in reverse shading in some
instances.
Power Machinery Center/February 1990 Page 1 Luft Environmental Consulting
underground storage tank and approximately 15 feet upgrade from the former fill pipe.
Figure 1 (A), upper right hand corner, captured a residual fluid mark along the base of
the adjacent building remnant from previous pooling of waste oil and cleaning fluids.
During excavation an area of obvious hydrocarbon discoloration was observed in the
tank removal backfill area. The contamination observed in the former tank location did '
not appear to have been continuous with onsite migration contamination evident in the
photographs. Excavation continued to a depth of 12 feet, the depth at which a
combination hydrocarbon and detergent-like odor was no longer present and field
screening did not indicate contamination. The unusual odor may be correlated to the
wash rack and dry well on the adjacent property, upgrade of the tank location.
Analyses of sample number 1, obtained from the bottom of the excavation pit, reported
oil and grease concentrations of 530 pgm/gm (Method 9071) and 711 ~gm/gm
(Method 413.2). These values may be attributable to sloughing of the excavation pit.
Analyses of two soil boring samples from a depth of 15 feet were nondetectable for oil
and grease.
Conclusions
The underground waste oil tank site was remediated via excavation and disposal.'
Observations made during the excavation and laboratory analyses indicate that
contamination is concentrated near the surface on the east side of the property~
However, oil and grease were detected by analyses of soil obtained from a depth of 12
feet. Field screening and visual examination of the sample does not support waste oil
contamination at that depth. It is recommended that no further action be required at
this site.
Power Machinery Center/February 1990 Page 2 Luft Environmental Consulting
A B
C D
FIGURE 1. Photographs (A) through (C) are views of the east wall of the excavation pit. Photograph
(C) illustrates the location of sample #3 in the northwest corner of the excavation. Contaminated soil is
apparent in the darker areas.
Power Machinery Center/January 1990 Luft Environmental Consulting
A B
C D
FIGURE 2. Views of the southeast corner of the excavation pit. Contaminated soil is apparent in the
darker areas. Sample #2 was obtained from the darkened soil in photograph (D).
Power Machinery Center/January 1990 Luff Environmental Consulting
ATTACHMENT I '
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFESTS
State of California---Health and Welfare Agency uepanmem o7 Memm ~erv~ces
Form Approved OMB No. 2050~0039 (Expires 9'30'91'i1~M I~ Toxic Substances Control Division
Please print or type. (Fo~ designed for use on elit~ ~ '~ typewriter). ~~ Sacramento, California
is not requiredby Federal law.
/ WASTE MANIFEST ~AIL I~~~-~1~ /
-- ' A. ~tate ~nifeat
3. G~erator's Name and Mailing Address D~ument Number
~~ ~~/~ ~~ B. State Generatoes ID
~' 5. Transpolar 1 Company Name . , 6. US EPA ID Number ~ Staie T~a~i~'s ID -
g III I II I I I I I I F. Tra,sp~er'. Phone
L 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address ~ 10. US EPA ID Number G. State Facility's ID
~ ~ ~A ~ ~O H. rlcility'8 Pho,e
;~ ~ - -- ~ ' -- -~2. Containers ~13. Total -- ' 1~ I.
11. US DOT Description (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quantity Unit Waste No.
No. Type Wt / Vol
.
E ' ' State
~ R
3 T EPA/~her
o I I I I I I I
3 EPA/~her
I I I I I I I
d. State
EPA/~her
J. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed ~ove K. Handling ~dea for Wastes Liste~ Above
a. b.
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Info~ation
GENERATOR'O CERTIFICA~ON: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described ~bove by proper shipping name
and are classified, packed, ma~ed, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpo~ by highway according to applicable international and
national government regulations.
If I am a large quantity generator, I ce~i~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined
to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal cu~ently available to me which minimizes the
present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effo~ to minimize my waste
generation and select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford.
Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Year
T 17. Transpolar 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
~ 18. Transpo~er 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
~ Printed/Typed Name ' I Signature Month Day Year
19. Discrepancy Indication Space t~
F
A
C
I 20. Facility ~ner or Operator ~ification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in ~em 19.
T
y Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Year
I
I I I I I I
DHS 8022 A (1/~) Do Not Write ~low This Line
EPA 87~22
(Rev. 9-~) Previous editions are obsolete. ~ue: GENERAT~ SENDS THIS COPY ~O ~H5 WITHIN 30
To: P.O. ~x 4~, ~romento, CA
State of California--Health and Welfare Agency Department of Health Services
Form Approved OMB No. 2050~0039 (Expires Toxic Substances Control Division
Pleas.___e.e print or type. (Form designed for use on elit~ ,~ typewriter). / Sacramento, Californi~
4 ~, UNIFORM HAZARDOUS "l"W~,,erator's US EPA ID No. Manifest .. Page I ~ Info,etlon in the shaded areas
WASTE MANIFEST ~1~1~1~t~151~1~1~1~~°~ / of /I ia not required by Federal law.
3. ~rator's ~am~ Mailin~Address. -- ~ ~ Number
B. State Generato¢a ~
~ 5. Transpo~er , Company Name ~ 6. US EPA ID Number . . / ~.'SlateTrana~o,,'s~ e~l~' .... '
~ ~ Transpo~er 2~ompany Name 8. ~s ~P~ i~ Number' E. State Tranapo~er's I~
3 F. Transpo~er's Phone
~ 9. Designated Facility ~ame and Site Address/ ~ 10. US EPA ID Number G. State Facilfly's ID
~ ~5~-~o~ ~,//~ I I I I I I I I I I I I
~ -- -- ~ ~ C~tainers ~ ~4. -
12.
13.
Total
' Quantity Unit Waate No.
11. US DOT Description (including Proper Shipping Name. Hazard Class, and ID Number)N ~o.
E b. -- ...... State
; R
A EPA/~her
T
o II I
R c. State
EPA/~her
I I I I I I I
d: State
EPA t ~her
.. c. d.
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
16. '
GEHER~TOR'S CERTIFIC~TIOH: I hereby declare l~t lhe co~lenls of this consig~me~l are lally a~d accarately described above by proper shipping n~me
and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respect~ i~ ~ro~er co~dilioo for lranspo~ by highway according 1o applicable inl~malional and
~tional govar~meot regulations.
If I a~ a large quaotity generator, I ce~ity th~l I have a ~rogram in place to reduce lhe volume and toxicity of ~asle generated lo lhe degree I have dele~ined
to be economically ~racticable and lhal I h~ve selected the practicable m~thod of treatmeot, storage, or disposal currently available to me which mioimizes the
present and lulure threat 1o human heallh and the e~viro~me~t; OR, it I am a small q~a~lity generator, I have made a good failh effo~ 1o minimize my
ge~eralio~ and select lhe best wasle management method lhal is available to me a~d lhal I ca~ atford.
T 1~. Transpo~ei 1 A~knowledg~nt of Receipt of Materials
R
A Prin~d/Typed ~e~ ~ ~ ~ ig , Month Day Year
N
Printed / Typed Name Signat~ ~e Day
Month
Year
E
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
F
A
C
L
I 20. Facilily ~ner or ~eralor ~ificafion of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19.
T
y Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Year
I
(Rev. 9-88) Previous editions are obsolete. Blue: GENERAT~ SENDS THIS COPY TO ~HS WITHIN 30 DAYS
To: P.O. ~x 4~, ~cromento, CA 95812-~00
State of California---He=lth and Welfare Agency Department of Health Services
Form ~.proved OMB No. 2050---0039 (Expires .... __ lb Toxic Substances Control Division
Please print or type. (Form designed for use on elit~ ~ ~h typewriter)..~iiF Sacramento, Californii
~ [ UNIFORM HAZARDOUS ~=ne~=to~'s US EPA ID NO. Manifest z. Page ~ [ Info~ation in the shaded areas
WASTE MANIFEST C~~I~IO[~I~I~ 0D~u~'~~ of I, ,s .ot required by Federal law.
7. Transpolar 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number E. State Transpo~er's ID
9. Designate~ Facility Name and Site Address 10. U~ EPA ID Number G. 8tare Facility's ID
~ - I. 12. Contai~rs 13. Total 14. I.
11. US DOT Descriphon (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quantity Unit Waste No.
G EPA/~h
E b. State
R
A EPA/~her
T
R c. State
EPA / ~her
EPA/~her
I I I I I I I
GENERATOR'S CER~FICA~ON: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by ~roper shipping name
and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpo~ by highway according to applicable international and
national government regulations.
If I am a large quantity generator, I cedify that I have a program in ;lace to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined
to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the
, present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effo~ to minimize my waste
generation end select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford.
Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Year
aT 17. Transpo.e, 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of MaterialsJ ,~~' ~~~
A Printed/Typed Name ~ I S'gl~ure ~l Month Day Year
[ 10. Transpo.e, 2 AcknOwledgement of~ceipt of Materials
~ Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Year
I
E
19. Discrepancy Indication S~ace
F
A
C
L
I 20. Facility ~ner or Operator Cedification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in .em 19.
T
y Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Year
~ ~ I I I
To: P.O. ~x 4~, S~ramento, CA 95812-04~
ATTACHMENT II
LABORATORY ANALYSES
SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry
Client Name:Luft Environmental Consulting
Address :3701 Pegasus Dr., Suite 121
Bakersfield, Ca. 93308
Date samples received :12-21-89
Date analysis completed:12-28-89
Date of report :12-29-89
Laboratory No.3703 through 3705
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3703 ID:I ~r ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Oil & Grease 530 , 20
#3704 ID:2 t~. ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Oil & Grease 64,000 20
#3705 ID:3 ~+T, ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Oil & Grease 75 20
Method of Analysis: EPA 9071
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
VIRONYENTAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
PETROLffU¥ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., ~KERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
SMC LAB Date Reported: 01/11/90 Page 1
P O BOX 80835 Date Received: 01/05/90
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.s 158-1
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: ~142-SOIL SAMPLE
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(Title 22, Article II, California Administrative Code)
Method
Constituents Sample Results P.O.L. Unite Method Ref.
Oil & Grease 711. 10. mg/kg 413.2 2
Requlator¥ Criteria
Constituents STLC. m~/L TTLC, mq/kq
Comment: Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on
an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals
(TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine ~otal levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed.
N.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.).
I.S. = Insufficient Sample
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES: (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982.
(~ "~tho~.Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020.
8 'Y~ /
ATTACHMENT III
CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
3701 Pegasus Dr., Suite 121 · Bakersfield, CA 93308 - (805) 399- 5838
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJECT NUMBER , PROJECT NAME
- E~~
~ m z~
8A~P~ ~ ~
NUMBER DA~ ~ME ~ SAMPLING L~AT~N
R~~~Tre) '~'~D'e. ~me '~; .'~ R.eiv~~~~[by: (Sign~u.) Relinquish~ ~ (S~nature) D.e . ~me R~ived by: (S~nature)
Rel,quish~by(S~na~r.)~//~. :~Z ~D~ ~ ~mej ~ i' O0 g~~nature),,r /D~ / ~m.~~/I/'' J ~La~ra.. Name
"~ SMC LABORATORY
3155 P~ASUS DRIVE P.O. BOX 80835
BAKERSIE~, CA 93308 BAK~SFIE~, CA 93380
( 05) 93- 597
C~IN OF CUS~DY
Nmme: ~7~/ /~~ ~ ~e: Water Other
, ac ss: Sludg~
o o
Lab ~ Description: Other Tests
~ . ~me: Comments:
~linquish~ By: Daoe. Time: fleceiv~ By: Date:
GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300
Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 93301
(805) 861-3502 .... : ...... Telephone (805) 861-3636
STEVE McCALLEY ,~ ."'*" ' "~'-:'-.**. Telecop~er (805) 861-3429
Director RESOURCE ~i"E N T AGENCY
DlePARTMENT OF £N¥1RONMleNTAL
HEALTH SERVICES
;£
November 8, 1989
Carl Luft
Luft Environmental Consulting
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Subject: Location : 3818 Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, CA
Known As : Power Machinery Center
Permit # : 050007
Dear Mr. Luft:'
Pursuant to our telephone conference this Date, our Department has
reviewed the remediation technique and implementation plan for the above named
facility and find it acceptable with the following modifications.
1. An additional soil sample shall be retrieved at the lowest depth
of the excavation.
2. The proposed 180 day completion time frame of the
implementation plan shall be revised to "within 45 days". Our
Department feels this revision is necessary due to the approaching
rainy season and probable elevation of groundwater level.
Please notify our Department 48 hours prior to commencement of
excavation.
Sincerely, ~
Flora Darling, R.E.H.S. ~
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:cd
cc: Robert Power
darling\luft.let
LUFTENVIRONMENTAL_Baker (805) 399-5838
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121 ~, ~;~~~ .
'~X ~"~'' '" "X~/°vember 6, 1989
Kern County Resource Management Agency
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 "M" Street, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn: Flora Darling
Luff Environmental Consulting has prepared the enclosed Remediation Technique
and Implementation Plan on behalf of Power Machinery Center, for their 3818 Pierce
Road facility.
The underground tank was removed pursuant to permit #A900-05. The site
characterization was conducted under permit #050007.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed plan, please contact me or Kathy
Parker at your convenience.
Karl W. Luff
Principal
Mechanical Engineer
KEP
cc: Robert Power
Power Machinery Center
REMEDIATION TECHNIQUE AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
POWER MACHINERY CENTER
Permanent Closure of Underground Tank
I. Introduction
A Site Characterization and Mitigation Plan was submitted to the Department of
Environmental Health Services (DEHS) on behalf of the Power Machinery
Center located at 3818 Pierce Road. Of the three possible remediation
techniques proposed in the plan, only the excavation and disposal alternative
was acceptable to DEHS. The purpose of this plan is to provide an
implementation schedule for the excavation and disposal remediation
technique.
The tank was removed pursuant to Kern County Health Department permit
number A900-05 on April 11, 1989. The site characterization was conducted
under Permit number 050007.
I1. Implementation Plan
A. Preliminary Disposal Assessment
As required by. GSX Services of California, Inc. for disposal
consideration, a soil sample has been provided to Zalco Laboratories,
Inc. for metals, PCB's, sulfide, and cyanide analyses. Upon receipt of.
analyses, a Waste Information Form, accompanied by the analysis and a
soil sample, will be submitted to GSX.
B. Excavation and Disposal Procedure
Power Machinery Center will contract a backhoe operator to perform the
excavation and an environmental consultant to supervise excavation and
hauling. Transportation will be provided by a state registered hauler.
Onsite monitoring, including an HNU meter and visual inspection, will be
used to delineate the area of contamination to prevent the unnecessary
disposal of clean soil. The upper limit of excavation would be
approximately 130 cubic yards, from which 45 cubic yards or less of
contaminated soil would be segregated for later disposal.
Power Machinery Center/November 1989/Page 1 Luff Environmental Consulting
C. Soil Sampling
The October 25, 1989 letter from the DEHS states "if excavation and
disposal is chosen as the remediation technique, our Department will
require an additional soil sample at 20 feet. If groundwater is
encountered at 20 foot depth, a water sample will be required to
determine if contamination is present."
We request that this additional requirement be deleted for the following
reasons.
Laboratory analysis of samples taken during the site
characterization study confirmed that the contamination from the
former Power Machinery waste oil tank did not extend below 15
feet.
The site characterization plan verified that groundwater was not
encountered during the borings. Therefore, the groundwater was
not contaminated by the waste oil release.
Equipment available on site for the remediation cannot obtain the
requested sample. The requested depth of the sample is beyond
the reach of a backhoe.
Physical property constraints will not permit sufficient sloping of
the excavation to allow personnel to enter the excavation in
compliance with applicable OSHA requirements.
D. Schedule
The implementation plan, as outlined, will be completed within 180 days
of DEHS approval of the plan.
III. Summary
The remediation technique chosen for the underground waste oil tank location
is the excavation and disposal alternative. Power Machinery Center will
contract the necessary excavation and transportation services. Tentative
Power Machinery Center/November 1989/Page 2 Luff Environmental Consulting
disposal arrangement have been made with GSX Services. The
implementation plan will be completed within 180 days of acceptance of the
plan.
Power Machinery Center/November 1989/Page 3 Luff Environmental Consulting
GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300
Agency Director 9ekerlfleld, CA 93301
(805) 861-3502 ,..~-..--. Telephone (805) 861-3636
STEVE McCALLEY ~.._ Telecopler (805) 861-3429
D,,ecto. RESOURCE ~~ENT AGENCY
D E PA R T~:~.~.~N M E N TA L
October 25, 1989
Robert Power
5450 Camino
Oxnard, CA
Subject: Location: 3818 Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, Ca
Known As: Power Machinery Center
Permit #: 050007
Dear Mr. Power:
Our Department is in receipt of site characterization and mitigation plans submitted by Luft
Environmental Consulting for the above named facility.
Two borings to determine depth of soil contamination were performed September 26, 1989.
Borings B-1 and B-2 confirmed that Hydrocarbons were not detectable below 15 feet depth.
Laboratory analyses of soil borings indicate a contamination plume of 5 - 6 foot radius and a depth
not greater than 15 feet.
Depth to groundwater is very shallow at this location, being approximately 15 - 20 feet.
Boring logs note the presence of moisture at 15 feet which indicate the capillary fringe may have been
encountered. The boring logs also indicate the soil profile to be predominantly sandy/pebbly soils
which would allow rapid downward leaching of contamination.
Luff Environmental Engineering has recommended excavation and disposal of the contaminated
soil. Our Department finds this method to be acceptable, where the other remediation proposals of
no action and Bioremediation are not.
If excavation and disposal is chosen as the remediation technique, our Department will require
an additional soil sample at 20 feet. If groundwater is encountered at 20 foot depth, a water sample
will be required to determine if contamination is present.
A statement of the remediation technique and implementation plan of the remedial action must
be submitted to our office for review and approval within 30 days.
If you have any questions you may contact me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Flora Darling, R.E.H.S. '"
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121 · Bakersfield, California 93308 · (805) 399-5838
Octob
Kern County Resource Management Agency
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 "M" Street, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn: Flora Darling
Luff Environmental Consulting has prepared the enclosed Site Characterization and
Mitigation Plan on behalf of Power Machinery Center, for their 3818 Pierce Road
facility. An implementation plan will be provided upon approval of the enclosed plan.
The underground tank was removed pursuant to permit #A900-05.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed plan, please contact me or Kathy
Parker at your convenience.
Karl W. Luff
Principal
Mechanical Engineer
KEP
cc: Robert Power
Power Machinery Center
SITE CHARACTERIZATION/MITIGATION PLAN
POWER MACHINERY CENTER
Permanent Closure of Underground Tank
Introduction
The Power Machinery Center is a forklift facility, owned and operated by Robert Power
since establishment of the business. Crankcase lubricating oils were stored in an
underground tank at this facility for approximately ten years. The tank was removed
pursuant to Kern County Health Department permit number A900-05 on April 11,
1989.
As a result of contamination evident from soil tests performed during the preliminary
site assessment, an assessment of Power Machinery Center's facility was performed
in accordance with the Site Characterization Work Plan submitted to the Department of
Environmental Health Services (DEHS). Written approval of the proposed work was
received from Flora Darling of the DEHS, in a letter dated September 13, 1989.
Results of Preliminary Site Assessment
Analyses of soil samples collected from 2 and 6 foot depths indicated further
investigation was needed. Analyses from these samples are included in Attachment I.
Sampling Procedures
Two borings were completed at the site on September 26, 1989 (Figure 1). Borings
were made with a continuous flight hollow-stem auger rig. Standard split-spoon
samples were collected at 5 foot intervals in each boring, starting at 10 feet below
grade. Samples were field screened with an HNU photoionization detector (PID) for
volatile organic content.
Sample collection procedures were followed as outlined in the Site Characterization
Work Plan. All samples recovered were submitted to state-certified SMC Laboratory
for archiving and analyses.
Analyses were performed for total organic halogens (EPA 9020), oil and grease (EPA
9071), and total lead (3050/7420). Lab analyses are in Attachment II.
Power Machinery Center/October 1989/Page 1 Luff Environmental Consulting
LOCATION ~
B-2 ~ ~
eee >>
SHED ® (~PROPAN
POWER MACHINERY (n
CENTER BUILDING u.
~p PAVED PARKING
AREA ~
PIERCE ROAD
LUFT
ENVIRONMENTAL
.~~.'~~ CONSUL TING
DESCRIPTION: FIGURE 1
BUMPER POST · LOCATION MAP
FENCE {XXXXXX ~LOCATION: POWER MACHINERY CENTER
BORING ~ ' 3818 PIERCE ROAD
SCALE: DATE:
1"=25' October 1989
Hydrology/Geology
Based on the Kern County Water Agency Water Supply Report 1988 and borehole
data, depth to groundwater is known to be greater than 15 feet and estimated to be
less than 50 feet. The quality of the groundwater in the unconfined aquifer is excellent,
containing less than 500 ppm Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) according to the Kern
County Water Agency's report. Groundwater was not encountered during drilling.
Surface water near the area includes intermittent Kern River water to the southeast
and the Kern County Water Agency's temperature equalization pond to the northeast.
Sediments encountered during completion of the borings consisted of sand with minor
amounts of silt and pebbles. No evidence of bedding was observed. An anomalous
micaceous silt was identified in archived-sample B-2-10B. The depositional
environment of the Kern River flood-plain would indicate that the silt is an overbank
deposit. Lithologies are described on the boring logs located in Attachment II.
Findings
Borehole B-1 was drilled to a depth of 15 feet, approximately 2-3 feet east of the former
tank location. Hydrocarbon contamination was detected at a depth of ten feet but was
nondetectable by 15 feet. Borehole B-2' was drilled to a depth of 10 feet and rejected
prior to obtaining a sample. Boring B-2 was drilled to a depth of 15 feet below grade
without visual, olfactory, or HNU-meter field detection of hydrocarbons. Contrary to
field observations, laboratory analyses indicated 4300 ppm oil and grease at ten feet
below grade. Visual inspection of the sample at SMC Laboratories indicated an
anomalous thinly bedded micaceous silt. Subsequent analyses of sample B-2-15B
indicated that oil and grease were nondetectable. It is plausible that the Iow
permeability of the silt provided a barrier to downward migration, and concentration, of
hydrocarbons. Laboratory analyses confirmed that hydrocarbons were below
detectable levels in boreholes B-1 and B-2 at 15 feet below grade (Attachment II).
Laboratory results indicate that contamination is contained laterally within a 5 to 6 foot
radius from the location of the former tank and to a depth not greater than 15 feet.
Dependent upon lateral extent of the silt, contamination may be contained at a depth
of approximately 10 feet. A plan view and cross section provide graphic illustration of
the extent of contamination (Figures 2 and 3). The plan view also serves as a cross
section index.
Power Machinery Center/October 1989/Page 3 Luff Environmental Consulting
A
l
FENCE
...... I. ....................... '_Trl.'¢. .................... 'L __ '' . '_ ..... '' _ ..................... '__'_____'__'
LUFT
LEGEND ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING
BORING LOCATION DESCRIPTION: FIGURE 2
PLAN VIEW
LOCATION: POWER MACHINERY CENTER
LATERAL
EXTENT
OF
PLUME
3818 PIERCE ROAD
SCALE: DATE:
1"=4' October 1989
Fence
A s-2 s-2' S-~ ~ A'
WEST ;' \
~ EAST
%
Apl
Former Tank
Location
,5'
10' Rejected at 10' 10'
-.-. = = = =..--.- 2900 ppm
~ 4300 ppm (3 ppm)
/-
(ND) /
SILT
15' 15'
ND ND
(ND) (ND)
Total Depth Total Depth
16,5' 16,5'
LUFT
LEGEND ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING
[] Sample Analyzed by Laboratory DESCRIPTION: FIGURE 3
BOLD TYPE Laboratory Results- Oil and Grease CROSS SECTION A - A'
Concentration ppm
.OCATION: POWER MACHINERY CENTER
(ppm) HNU Meter Reading 3818 PIERCE ROAD
ND Non -detectable SCALE: DATE:
1 "=4' October 1989
Remedial Action Alternatives
Excavation and Disoosal
Excavation and disposal provides one remediation alternative for the impacted soil.
Laboratory and field screening results indicate excavation would be required to a
depth of 15 feet. The upper limit of excavation would be approximately 130 cubic
yards, from which 45 cubic yards or less of contaminated soil would be segregated for
later disposal. Tentative disposal arrangements have been made with GSX Services
of California. Onsite monitoring, including an HNU meter and visual inspection, would
be used to delineate the area of contamination to prevent the unnecessary disposal of
clean soil.
The cost of excavation, transportation and disposal is estimated to be $4200.
Bioremediation
There are two forms of bioremediation that are currently gaining credibility as
remediation techniques. Currently, the most proven method of bioremediation is a
form of composting. The compost bin is designed to augment the growth of naturally
occurring bacteria within the contaminated soil. Bacterial inoculations and fertilization
techniques may be used to augment the decomposition of the contamination.
An alternative form of bioremediation is the in-situ method. The principles of
composting are applied sub-surface. In-situ remediation employs inoculations of
fertilizers and/or micro-organisms into or around the plume to reduce the
contamination.
A disadvantage of bioremediation is that the process can not achieve 100% efficiency.
This is especially true with the in-situ process because there is less control of the
environment. Effectiveness is very site-dependent; influencing factors include soil
moisture, pH, and temperature and the size and type of microbial population.
Evaluation and monitoring of this technique is limited by economics to data derived
from occasional core samples from varying locations in the plume.
Due to the lack of relevant case studies, it is difficult to provide a cost estimate for this
method. However, the limited extent of contamination and uncertainties associated
with bioremediation render the capital costs of equipment, operation, and
maintenance prohibitive relative to other alternatives.
Power Machinery Center/October 1989/Page 6 Luff Environmental Consulting
No ActiQn
The no action alternative is not applicable in this situation due to the depth and quality
of groundwater.
Summary
The remedial action recommended for the underground waste oil tank location is the
excavation and disposal alternative. This recommendation is based on the following
factors.
Excavation and disposal allows for immediate and complete site cleanup.
Threat to gt'oundwater and the environment would be removed.
Alternative remediation actions do not provide any advantages, with respect to
the environment or cost, over the excavation and disposal method.
Power Machinery Center/October 1989/Page 7 Luft Environmental Consulting
A'R'ACHMENT I
LABORATORY ANALYSES . PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT
BC LABORATORIES, INC., SOIL TEST RESULTS
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
Sample Description: Power Machinery Tank 2'
METHOD
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLE RESULTS P.Q.L. UNITS METHOD
Lead 86.7 2.5 mg/kg EPA 6010
TOX* 29 20 mg/kg EPA 9020
Oil and Grease 16113 20 mg/kg EPA 413.1
Sample Description: Power Machinery Tank 6'
METHOD
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLE RESULTS P.Q.L. UNITS METHOD
Lead 17.8 2.5 mg/kg EPA 6010
TOX* None Detected 20 mg/kg EPA 9020
Oil and Grease 3381 20 mg/kg EPA 413.1
* TOX = Total Organic Halogens
ATTACHMENT II
LABORATORY ANALYSES - SITE CHARACTERIZATION
SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Luft Environmental Consulting
Address : 3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Date sample received : 9-26-89
Date analysis completed: 10-05-89
Date of report : 10-06-89
Laboratory No. 2661 through 2664 Project No. PM-01
Project Name: Power Machinery Site Characterization
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#2661 ID: B-I-10C ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
TOX 33 20
Oil & Grease 2,900 20
mg/kg MDL,mg/kg
Total Lead 8.0 1.0
Method of Analysis for TOX: EPA 9020
Method of Analysis for Oil & Grease: EPA 907]
Method of Analysis for Total Lead: 30~0/7420
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TOX = Total Organic Halogen
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
ND = Not detected
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Laboratory No. 2661 through 2664 Project No. PM-01
Project Name: Power Machinery Site Characterization
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#2662 ID: B-I-15B ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
TOX ND 20
Oil & Grease ND 20
mg/kg MDL,mg/kg
Total Lead 2.0 1.0
#2663 ID: B-2-10B ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
TOX 23 20
Oil & Grease 4,300 20
mg/kg MDL,mg/kg
Total Lead 2.4 1.0
Method of Analysis for TOX: EPA 9020
Method of Analysis for Oil & Grease: EPA 9071
Method of Analysis for Total Lead: 3050/7420
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TOX = Total Organic Halogen
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer '
SMC Laborato~ Anal~ical Chemistry
Client Name: Luft Environmental Consulting
Address : 370] Pegasus Drive, Suite 121
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Date sample received : 9-26-89
Date analysis completed: 10-16-89
Date of report : 10-17-89
Laboratory No. 2664 Project No. PM-O1
Project Name: Power Machinery Site Characterization
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#2664 ID: B-2-15B ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
TOX ND 20
Oil & Grease ND 20
mg/kg MDL,mg/kg
Total Lead 2.4 1.0
Method of Analysis for TOX: EPA 9020
Method of Analysis for Oil & Grease: EPA 9071
Method of Analysis for Total Lead: 3050/7420
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TOX = Total Organic Halogen
ugm/gm = micrograms per micrograms
mg/kg = milligrams per kilograms
ND = Not detected
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
ATTACHMENT III
BORING LOGS
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL ;~ ~ P~S DRIVE, STE. 121 STA~'~ 3N DATE DATUM ELEVATION i
--I~KERSFIELD, CA 93308 SEPTEME,.-R 26, 1989 N/A
CONSULTING (8o5) 399-5838
BORING LOG FAX (805) 399.5894 BORING DEPTH (FT) WELL DEPTH (FT)
16.5 N/A
PROJECT CODE LOG OF BORING SAMPLES DESCRIBED BY:
WATER DEPTH (FT) TOTAL # SAMPLES
PM-01 B-1 KATHY PARKER N/A 2 ARCHIVED
DRILLING EQUIPMENT LOCATION OF THE BORE SITE PG 1 OF 1
HOLLOW STEM AUGER/SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER POWER MACHINERY-3818 PIERCE ROAD
DRILLING COMPANY/DRILLER PROJECT COORDINATOR
CONSOLIDATED DRILLING/DAVE KARL LUFT
SAMPLE DEPTH PID BLOW
TIME NUMBER FROM GRAPHIC SAMPLE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS
SURF LOG (ppm) COUNT
Asphaltic Material to approximately six feet
5'
CUTTINGS:
..... Silty SAND: reddish brown to brownish black, <3% pebbles, 20%
i i i i i . coarse to very coarse sand, predominantly fine to medium grained
..... sand, micaceous, poorly sorted, unconsolidated, dry, faint
..... petroleum odor.
10:16 B-I-10C 1 o' ~11 SAND: brownish black, 10% fine grained, predominantly medium 3 50
I;;; i; to coame grained, micaceous, fair sorting, unconsolidated, 28
._ moist, visible oil staining, fair petroleum odor. 8
10:57 B-1-15B 15'!_ ..... SAND: light brown, 10% coarse grained, 90% medium grained, well ND 6
sorted, micaceous, unconsolidated, damp to moist, no odor. 8
.. 15
20'
25'
30'
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL ~) PEGASUS DRIVE, STE. 121 START/CO~ ')N DAiF. DATUM ELEVATION
'"E~KERSFIELD, CA 93308 SEPTEIVI~,_rl 26, 1989 N/A
CONSULTING (8o5) 399-5838
BORING LOG FAX (805) 399-5894 BORING DEPTH (FT) WELL DEPTH (FT)
16.5 N/A
~ROJECT CODE LOG OF BORING SAMPLES DESCRIBED BY:
WATER DEPTH (FT) TOTAL # SAMPLES
PM-01 B-2 KATHY PARKER N/A 2 ARCHIVED
DRILLING EQUIPMENT LOCATION OF THE BORE SiTE PG 1 OF 1
HOLLOW STEM AUGER/SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER POWER MACHINERY-3818 PIERCE ROAD
DRILLING COMPANY/DRILLER PROJECT COORDINATOR
CONSOLIDATED DRILLING/DAVE KARL LUFT
SAMPLE DEPTH PID BLOW
TIME NUMBER FROM GRAPHIC SAMPLE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS
SURF LOG (.opm) COUNT
-' .... CUTTINGS:
~. · Pebbly Silty SAND: light to medium brown, <5% pebbles, 10%
i i i ~ i coarse to very coarse sand, predominantly fine to very finegrained
--, ..... sand, micaceous, poorly sorl~, unconsolidated, dry to damp, no
.i ..... pet~o I
,..o... eum odor.
-' ..... SAND: reddish brown, 25% coarse to very coarse sand, 75%
5' . .... medium grained, micaceous, well sorted, unconsolidated, damp, no
..... petroleum odor.
12:11 B-2-10B 10'Imf°; i~ .'~i Pebbly SAND: light brown, 10% very coarse grains to pebbles, ND 4
..... 10% fine grained, 80% medium to coarse grained, micaceous, 6
.. fair sorting, unconsolidated, damp, no petroleum odor. 8
12:26 B-2-15B 15' SAND: light brown, 10% coarse to very coarse grained, 90% medium ND N/A*
~ grained, well sorted, micaceous, unconsolidated, damp to moist,
no odor.
20'
25'
30'
" Problems with slide hammer
35'
ATTACHMENT IV
CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
3701 Pegasus Dr., Suite 121 · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 399 - 5835
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
P ROJECTNUMBER PROJEOT NAME
:~'~ ~~~~ ~~ESCRIPTION&
-
s,~.~ ~ ~ z~
I
Re~~~ ~mTMD',~me R~~ ~F~~ ~X~' ,~m.,~ R~iv. by:(S~nature)
Relinquish~ by ~a~re) D~ I ~me ~iv~or ~ratog by: (S~~ D~ I ~me ~og 'Name
05T-- 18--89 WED 8 '~' ? LUFT L P . 01
...... LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING ....
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite "~21 · ' Bakersfield~'-California 93308 · (805) 399-5838
TELECOPY TRANSMI'n'AL COVER SHEET
COMPANY: ¢.C ~
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER PAGE
~ ~ernlght
If any document is Illegible or incomplete, please telephone our receptionist.
Thank you.
CONFIRMATION REQUESTED: YES: .... NO: ~ ....
O~;T-- i 8--8~ W~'X3 8 ~ ~
~.~8 L.U~'T p. 0c~
...... POWER MACHINERY CENTER - SITE CHARACTERIZATION B~RING RESULTS
$~MPLE HNU METER ' :: TOX .... OIL & GREA,* TOTAL LEAD
ID '(ppm) (ugm/gm),~ ......... (...u_~_m_/.9_m) .......
B.~.~0'~" 3 "~3....................... ~oo 8
B- 1 r .1 .~ B ~ r~ .................... ~ 2
B'2'10B ~ ............................28 ~300 2'4
B'2'~SB ~.~ ~. ......................... ~ 2'4
OCTOBER 1989 LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
GARY J. WICKS 2700 M St~t, Suite ~
Agency Director Bekerlfleld, CA 93~1
(805) 861-3502 ~,.~__~:~:-~'t~ Telepho~ (~$)-861-36.16
~~:~. Telecopler (805) ~1-~29
STEVE
McCALLEY
O,r.,o, RESOURCE ~~NT AGENCY
· ~. , !
MENTAL
September 13, 1989
Robert Power
5450 Camino
Oxnard, California
Subject: Location: 3818 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California
Known As: Power Machine~ Center
Permit : #050007
Dear Hr. Power:
Our Department is in receipt of the site characterization workplan
submitted by Luft Environmental Consulting for the above named facility.
Due to the close proximity of shallow groundwater (10-20 feet) present at
this site, boring operations to dete~ine depth of soil contamination may
encounter groundwater.
Handbook #UT-35 describes the requirements for site investigations
involving contaminants which significantly threaten, or affect groundwater
sources.
The individual signing, and accepting responsibility, for the site
characterization report involving groundwater must either be a registered
geologist, hydrologist, or civil engineer possessing experience in hydrology.
Reports submitted by persons not possessing the above requirements may not
be accepted by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board.
In the event that 'Luft Environmental Consulting encounters groundwater
during boring operations at the site, the boring hole must be sealed with neat
cement grout. Further required site characterization studies must then be
conducted by a registered professional as described above.
If you have any questions you m~ contact me at (805) 861-3636.
FD:cas
cc: Luft Environmental Consulting
\flora\power.ltr
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 121 · Bakersfield, California 93308 · (805) 399-5838
August 15, 1989
Kern County Resource Management Agency
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 "M" Street, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn: Flora Darling
On behalf of the Power Machinery Center, Luft Environmental Consulting has
prepared the enclosed Site Characterization Work Plan for their 3818 Pierce Road
facility. The underground tanks were removed pursuant to permit #A900-05.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed plan, please contact me at your
convenience.
~ ~'-"-"-'""~' "'" ~'~'~ ...,'L/ Karl W. Luff
~/ (,~"~~~~ Principal
Mechanical Engineer
KEP ,~
cc: Robe~ Power ~
~owor Machino~ Contor
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN
POWER MACHINERY CENTER
Permanent Closure of Underground Tank
I. Site History
A. Type of business
The Power Machinery Center is a forklift facility, owned and operated by
Robert Power since establishment of the business.
B. Tank contents and length of time in place
The storage tank removed from the property contained crankcase lubricatin__g
oils. Although documentation of dates is unavailable, the owner/operator
estimates storage time to be approximately ten y~a~_rs. Prior to storing
lubricating oils, gasoline was stored in the tank for a short period of time, but
proved to be uneconomic. The tank was removed pursuant to Kern County
Health Department permit # A900-05 on April 11, 1989.
C. Discrepancies or reportable variations in past inventory
monitoring
There are no records of inventory monitoring.
D. Spills or leaks identified in the past
No spills or leaks have been identified in the past. (See Item C above.)
E. Known hydrogeology of the site
The depth to perched groundwater is estimated to be greater than 50 feet,
per verbal communication with Mr. Ken Turner of the Kern County Water
Agency. Mr. Turner also communicated that other consultants have not
recently encountered groundwater in this area in over 100 wells penetrating
50 feet.
ENVIRONMr~NTAL HEALTH
II. Proposal for Identifying Plume
A. Soil Sampling
Boring locations, depth and rationale
Soil borings will be made with a continuous flight hollow stem auger rig.
Drilling fluids will not be used. To determine the vertical and lateral extent of
contamination at the site, four test holes will be drilled in the approximate
locations as shown in Figure 1.
The first boring, B-l, will be located in the approximate center of the former
storage tank. This boring will document the vertical extent of any
contamination below the tank.
Boring B-2 will be approximately 8 feet southwest of the former location of the
tank site. This second boring, located down surface gradient of the tank, is
intended to help identify the lateral extent of contamination to the southwest
of the former tank site. Boring B-2 will also assist in defining the vertical
extent of contamination.
Boring B-3, as shown in Figure 1, is located 5 feet northeast from the prior
tank site, adjacent to the property line. Boring B-3 is being drilled as a result
of visible contamination and ponding on the adjacent property.
The final boring, B-4, is located 8 feet south of the prior tank site and
completes a triangular pattern. The actual distance of the last bore hole from
the former tank location will depend on the site conditions, site lithology and
the field screening results from the previous two borings.
Sample collection procedures ~.;~
In each test boring, samples will be obtained with a split spoon sampler every
five feet, starting at t__en f~-m below grade. Samplers will be steam cleaned or
washed prior to sampling. After sampling, both ends of the center brass liner
will be capped, the caps will be taped on, and the samples will be placed on
ice in a cooler for transport to the laboratory. A chain-of-custody form will
accompany the samples to the laboratory.
B.2®
SHED · (PROPANE~
· ee~
POWER MACHINERY
CENTER BUILDING u,.
'~, PAVED PARKING
AREA
PIERCE ROAD
FIGURE 1
~~~ POWER MACHINERY CENTER
CUSTOMER:
BUMPER POST · LOCATION: 38].8 P'I'~,RCE RO.,~D,
FENCE {XXXXXX
DATE: SCALE:
August 10, 1989 1" = 25'
LUFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
To minimize the analytical work, the remaining portions of the split spoon
samplers will be field screened utilizing an HNU meter to determine the'
approximate extent of contamination. If gasoline is encountered, a
SensidyneTM gasoline detector tube may also be used to field screen
samples. All field screening data will be provided to the Kern County
Department of Environmental Health Services (KCDEH$) within 5 days of the
completion of the borings.
If contamination is found, the bore hole drilling will stop after two consecutive
samples are screened with a "none detected" reading on the meter. If
groundwater or saturated soil is encountered prior to determing the vertical
extent of contamination, the KCDEHS will be notified immediately. If "none
detected" readings are the only readings on the HNU meter during the
boring, the maximum depth of the boring will be ~-five feet.
All HNU meter readings and SensidyneTM gasoline detector tube readings
will be documented and included with the boring log. The sample with the
highest "contaminated" reading on the meter and the first "clean" sample
drawn from the bore hole will be analyzed by a State certified laboratory to
verify the extent of contamination. All other samples will be properly archived
(cold storage up to 14 days) in the event that additional samples need to be
analYzed.
Analytical methods and QA/QC
Samples selected for analysis will be submitted to a state certified hazardous
waste laboratory. Analyses will be performed for total organic halogens
(TOX), oil and grease, and lead, as outlined by the California Department of
Health Services.
Results of Preliminary Site Assessment
The analytical results from the soil sampling performed during the preliminary
site assessment are included in this package as Attachment 1. Samples
were obtained from two and six feet below the previous location of the tank.
B. Water Sampling
Not applicable. However, in the event that saturated soil or groundwater is
encountered, the Kern County Health Department would be contacted for
further instructions. ~
C. Health and Safety Considerations
The firm(s) contracted to perform the soil boring and sampling will be
responsible for the health and safety of their employees. Before work
begins, a safety meeting will be held. Any known potential fire, explosion,
health hazards or other safety hazards will be identified by the on-site
personnel. Safety regulations established by the company will be discussed
along with the site specific safety plan.
Locations of all known underground pipelines and conduits in the area will
be described during the safety meeting. The contractor(s) will be given a
means to contact a representative of the company in the event of an
emergency.
Proper monitoring devices and personnel protective equipment will be
supplied by the contractor(s) for their employees. Training in the use and
maintenance of this equipment will be provided by the contractor(s).
III. Site Maps
Figure 1 is a plot plan of the Power Machinery Center Facility and the proposed
boring locations. The actual distance of boring B-4 from the tank site will be
determined in the field.
ATTACHMENT 1
PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT RESULTS
BC LABORATORIES, INC., SOIL TEST RESULTS
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
Sample Description: Power Machinery Tank 2'
METHOD
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLE RESULTS P.Q,L. UNITS METHOD
Lead 86.7 2.5 mg/kg EPA 6010
TOX* 29 20 mg/kg EPA 9020
Oil and Grease 16113 20 mg/kg EPA 413.1
Sample Description: Power Machinery Tank 6'
METHOD
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLE RESULTS P.Q.L. UNITS METHOD
Lead 17.8 2.5 mg/kg EPA 6010
TOX* None Detected 20 mg/kg EPA 9020
Oil and Grease 3381 20 mg/kg EPA 413.1
* TOX --- Total Organic Halogens
GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300
Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301
(SOS) 861-3502 --~:~:-, Telephone (SOS) 861-~3~__~_
":::""~ E N T
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
STEVEDirectorMCCALLEY
R E S 0 U R C Er-~~~M~vl*A!!i*: X G E N C Y
DEPARTMENT 'OE. ENV!,~ONMENTAL
HEA~L~H?$ERV. ICES
August 22, 1989
Luft Environmental Consulting
3701 Pegasus Dr., Suite 121
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Sue Luff
Dear Ms. Luft:
Enclosed please note the requirements, under the Business and
Professions Code, for Responsible Professionals involved in site remediation;
unauthorized release of Hazardous Materials; Underground Storage Tank
Regulations; and the Porter-Cologne Act.
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:cd
flora\luft.let
KEKN COUNTY HEALTH DEPART1~NT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'DIVISION
NEETING/CONFERENCE RECORD
/jr
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTt~NT
ENVIROhqqENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
~EETING/CONFERENCE RECORD
DISCUSS ION:
~ '~f - ~ -
~_~~,_~~ _
/jr
mental Henlth Services Delmr~
2700 ~ su~ SnUe 300 ATTACI~IENT "D"
Bake~d~ CA 9~101
(sos) s~t._~_~
June 13, 1989
Mr. Robert Power
P.O. Box 392
Oxnard. CA 93032
SUBJECT: Location: 3818 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Known As: Power Machinery Center
PERMIT #: 050007
Dear Mr. Robert Power:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to thls
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks: and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund: and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site: YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detalled invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon.
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Gary Wicks
Director, Resource Management Agency
attachments
. 2. Nearest surface water in unlined conveyance is within
75 feet of tank(s), or
3. Nearest agricultural or domestic water well is within
75 feet of tanks(s), or
4. Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge
area, or
5. Permitting Authority determines possible adverse
environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique
wildlife habitat areas.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight
of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action
plan, site remediatlon, and ongoing, monitoring is not covered by any fees or
permits. These costs will be recovered by Kern County Environmental Health
under the terms of the State contract described below. This contract ONLY
pertains to costs associated with oversight.
STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides
a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County
oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill
the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract.
The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the
costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
Accordingly, Attachment "D", the will serve as the official notification of
enrollment into the State Contract.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Gary Wicks
Director, Resource Management Agency
attachments
%..,v~,,~.'~ · · v.t' .~.-~z~.4 P 131 452 098
Henlth Services De RECEIPT FOR C~ED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVE~GE PROVIDED
~ ~ S~ ~ ~ NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAiL
~ ~ ~[ (See Reverse)
P~tate ano ZiP C~o
~oectal Dehvery Fee '
' qes~nc;ed Delivery Fee ~ ,'
~ Ae~urn Receot showm
June
13,
1989
~etum Receipt showing to whom
Date. and Address of Delivery
N~. Robert Po~e~ ~ 70TAL Postage and Fees j
P.O. Box 392
!
~ Postmar~ or Date
Oxna~d. CA 93032
SUBJECT: Location: 3818 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Known As: Po~er ~achinery Center
PE~IT ~: 050007
Dear ~r. Robert Power:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described
above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of
an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank.
This notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a
responsible party for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating
to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities.
California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code
Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result
of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE
CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED.
Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35. which states the minimum
required site workplan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting
environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms,
example illustrations, and a section discussing the answers to co~lonly asked
questions.
According to the criteria listed below and in Attachment "C", your site
has been designated as environmentally sensitive. All enviromaentally sensitive
sites are automatically enrolled into a State contract program for recovery of
oversight costs. The environmental sensitivity criteria for sites are as follows:
1. Highest historic ground water is within 100 feet of
ground surface, or
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
REPRESE~ING ~ OWNE~PERATOR ~ REGIO~L~A~ ~ ~MP~OR~ENC~NAM~ ,
ADDRESS . ~ .
NAME t CONT~TPE~ON I P~NE
FACILI~ N~E (IF APPLIC~L~ ~} OPE~TOR P~NE
ADDRESS
CROSS STRE~ I ~PE OF AR~ ~ ~MMERC~L ~TR~L ~ RUR~: ~PE OF BUSINESS ~ RETAIL FUEL STATION
~b L~ I ~ RESlDENT,~ ~ O~ER ~ FARM ~ O~ER
L~AL AGENCY AGENCY NAME ~NTACT PER~N ~ P~NE
REGION~ BOARD ~ P~NE
~ UNKNO~
DATE DI~O~RED ~W DI~D ~ IN~ORY ~ROL ~ SU~URF~ MONITORING ~ NUISA~E ~NDITDNS
~E~N ~ M~ USED TO STOP DI~HARGE (CHECK ~L ~T
~SDI~HARGEBEENSTOPPED? ~ REPAIRT~K ~ REPAIR PIPING ~ CH~GEPR~EDURE
~ PIPINGL~ AGE YRS ~EL ~ ~RR~ION
~UNDE~RMINED ~ mlLONLY ~ GROUNDWA~R ~ DRINKINGWAmR-(CHECKONLYIFWA~R~LLSHAVEACm~LYBEENAF~CmD)
~I~IN~STI~TIONINPR~RESS(DEFIN~GE~OFPROB~M) ~ ~UPINPR~RESS ~ SlGNEDOFF(~P~MP~ORUN~AR~
~ C~SI~(CD) ~ ~VA~&D~(ED) ~ R~O~FREEPRO~T(FP) ~ EN~EDBIODEG~A~ON(I~
~ CONTAINMENTBARRIER(~) ~ EX~VA~&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TR~TGROUNDWA~R(G~ ~ RE--ESSaY(RS)
~ TR~ENTAT~P(~ ~ NO~TIONREQUIRED(N~ ~ O~ER(O~
(
,,,---,,,-, lES. Inc.
)Y~I~L~IIM J' J' EGUN, lEG. CHEM. ENMI.
4~00 I)ILKE liD., BAKEIISFIELD, CALIFOIINIA 933M PHONE 327-#11
[¢EISC/IBIV~]~I:II~EA~Sl!:RViC]~S IAteReF~ted: 04/27/89 Page
8030 OLrv~~ Date Received: ~/[[/89
~~, ~ 93~8 ~to~.: 2672-1
At~.: J~~
~le~iptim: ~~T~' 4/11/89, ~.~
TOTAL CONTN~NANTS
(Title 22, Article II, California ktministrativ~ Code)
~ethod
Canstittamts Sample Resu3ts P.Q.L. Units Nethod Ref.
Lead 86.7 2.5 lag/kg 6010 1
0i~ & Grease 16113. '~ 20. l~j/kg 413.1 2
(See Last Page for C~a~en~, Definitic~s, Regulatory Criteria, a~t Refereace~)
RequiatorYCriteria
Ccastt~ts ~, n~/L 'L'~T_~,
Lead 5.0 1000.
Ccmae~t: Ail cxmstit~nts reported above are tn ~g/kg (unless otherwise stated)
an as received (~et) sample basis. Results reported represent totals
(TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate technl~ to cleter~t~e total levels.
p.Q.r.. -- Practical Quantttatta Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based ca~ sample size used a~i analytical tedmique
N.D. = NQr~ Detected (Cc~l~tt~t, If present, ~uld be 1_~ than the a~thod P.Q.L. ).
I.S. = I~sufftciant San~le
~ = Soluble ~ld ~,~t Ccmc~ntrati~
TT~C = Total ~ld Lt~tt
(1) "Test Hethods for [Va/uat/ng Solid Nastes", S~/ 846, July, 1982.
(2) "NeflYx~ fo~ Cbe~[~ Ana3~ of Nater and ~aste~", ~PA-6000 ~4-79-020.
FORTSON ~ S~RVICES Date Reported: 04/27/89 Pa~e
8030 OLrv~ DRIVE Date Received: 04/13/89
BAK]!:RSF~T~, CA 93308 Eaboratory No.: 2672-2
Attn.: JIN FORTSI~ O00-(XX}O
-~m~.le Description: P(Y~ NACHINE2~ TANK 6' 4/11/89, ~.l~r) BY: FRED ~
TOTAL. OONT~
(Title 22, Article II, California tc~ninistratlve Code)
Consti~ts -~p. le Results P.(~.L. Units Nethod Ref.
Lead 17.8 2.5 ag/kg 6010 1
TOX -~ Detected 20. mg/kg 9020 1
O11 & Grease 3381. 20. ag/kg 413.1 2
(See Last Page for C,~,~.--=.ts, Definitions, Regulatory Criteria, ~ Refe~ce~)
~t: All cccstlt~__~nts reported above are In ag/kg (unless otherwise stated) c~
an as received (~et) sanple basis. Results reported represent totals
(TZ~) as samp.l~ m2bjecT, ed to appropriate tecbni~__~_ to cleter~ir~ total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical (~ntttatt~n Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
N.D. = Nca~e Detected (Cca~tit~ent, If present, ~uld be leas than l~e ~ethod P.Q.L. ).
I.S. -- Insufficient Siq~e
STIC - Soluble Threshold r. iIt t ~trattcm
~ = Tol~l Threshold r. tm!t Ccelcentratt~
(1) "Teat NetJxxts for ~aluating Solid klastes", Si~ 846, 3~ly, 1982.
Date Rex'd: f/--/'/- ~ ? BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. L- 2 3 4 4 ~' · "~
Client: ~/~ T~'/~ S~pler: ~~ ~ Sample Ty~: An~ysis R~ucst~:
N~: ~0 ~ O/t~a~ Nm: ~C /~ff~ , Wat~ ~ Other:
Ad~ss:~ ~ <.~ Ad.ess: Soa ~ (s~y)
Atto: ~. ~ 5 ~ ~ ~1
Lab~ ~p~on: Ot~er Tern ~ ~ ':'
Re~quish~ By: Dmz: T~e: Receiv~ By: Date: UTime: ~ Co~ents:
" // U
White: Return to Customer with Report
Yellow:
BC
2700 'M' Street; Ste. 300 · : · "- ,... . :: - '.~... ,,.
Rake.field, CA 93301
.,...
· , . , .. :, .'"'..-~ '. ' . .- - '- ~' ' '...~' .... ".. -' .".J'", ~'//:~q'~'.~ '-: -:' ;L.-~)ff:: f '.
.... .,:... ::..:
PE~IT FOR PE~A~ CLOSURE '-'~~~7 'PERMIT '~ER A9OO-O5
SUBSTANCES sTo~E FACILITY ''
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS= OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: OONTRACTOR:
Power Machinery Center Robert Power FortS'on Const. &
3818 Pierce Road §450 Camino Environmental
Bakersfield, GA 93308 Oxnard, CA 730~ ~ 8030 Olive Drive
~,O. box ~ Bakersfield, CA 93308
LicenSe ~468665
Phone=(805) 485-0577 Phone=(805) 393-4518
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES June 30, 1989
! TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE March 30, 1989
LOGATION APPROVED BY
Dan Starkey
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.
2. A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-8636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or tnerttng and
filling) to arrange for required .inspections(s).
3. Permtttee must obtain a City Fire Department_permit prior' 'to initiating
4 Tank Closure 'activities must be ..per Kern'.:C6unty 'E~Vi~fimen%ai'"'.Health
Department and F/re Department' .approved methOds. 'as described..!n_ ~.. ~.~Handb°°k
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE : pERMi? NUMBER A900-05
OF UI~EROROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
5. Soil Sampling Any deviation from sample locations and nUmbers or
constituents to be sampled for which are described below and in Handbook
#UT-30 must receive prior approval by the Health Department.
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or less) - a minimum of two samples must be
retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately
two feet and six feet.
6. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted
by the specialist listed on the permit.
7. Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the
dispenser area(s ) .
8. Sample analysis
a. Ail waste oil samples must be analyzed for total organic ha/ides, oil
and grease, and lead.
9. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted 'to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
10. Ali applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil.
11. Permtttee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
12. Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 24
hours advance notice.
13. Results must be submitted to this office within three 'days~Of analysis
completion.
' ' ......
:~%.. ~-;,,'-,:~ ,:~,-F~'t'~,-~ ;~-;'~.. ~'".d-' ..'.'"~."t -: ',:.~." '~,-': t:-.' '--"- z.j... '~.:...~.:. '~ ,:",:' ',.~ ,~ .- [..,~
· , KERN C O UNTY -'
'>' 2?O§"M' Street. Ste. 300 '~' ' '.
Bakersfield, CA 93301 F, aviz'olmPmtal Health Sez'vices Department .% ', ,.. ....
~ ,'.' ':'.~:', ~<'. . ,.
(805) 861-9636 · ~..: ..... .---.,:,-
PERNI? FOR PERNANEN? CLOSURE '" PERMIT .NUNBERA900-0$
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ~': '
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S)'NAME'/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR:
Power Machinery Center Robert Power Fortson Const. &
3818 Pierce Road 5450 Camino Environmental
Bakersfield, CA 93308 Oxnard, CA 8030 Olive Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93308
License #468665
Phone:(805) 485-057? Phone:(805) 393-4518
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES June 30f 1989
1 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE Marc~ 30, 1989'
LOCATION APPROVED BY
Dan Starkey
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.'
2. A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or inerting and
f/l/lng) to arrange for required inspections(s).
_
3. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Departmen~t permit 'p~tor to ]thtttattng
closure action. '"-',':·
._ i~' ~,,.::,,.-,-.. · ,.~.
4. Tank closure a~tlvltles must be per .Ko~n,
Department and Fire Department approved method~ a~ :deS~'lb'~d':?l'n' Handbook
~UT-30 '" .:' ' "~ .":?<:::
. .~ , . , ,. , . · ? :., ~'. ~' ],,,.',.:':.~,f,:.,j :-,i, :; ,, "? ....
) MET,~L, ] No. 3 0 7 2 6
JRECYCLING, INC.~ TANK DISPOSAL FORM
Ontario, CA 91761 Job ~
(714) 947-2888
DEST~T~ON: A.M.R. 2202 S. Milliken Ave., Ontario, CA 91761
DATE TIME PROJECTED TANKS ~ ORDERED BY: { LIC. NO.
TIME
IN:
TIME OUT:
. Se~ices Rendered Cost
Disposal Fee 200.00 TANKS RECEIVED
: QTY. GALLONS TYPE N ET TONS TOTAL
Extensive ~ading Time 150.00 F* S*
280 ~ ~ .14
Disposal Fee with ~rmit 300.00 ~ 550 ~ ~' .24
Fiberglass Tank Disposal Fee ~r Tank 400.00 1000- 12 ft. ~ ~ .44
1000-6ft. ~ ~ .61
Delivered 200.00 1500 Q ~ .87
2000 ~ ~ .97
2500 ~ ~ 1.14
Bobtail Disposal Fee~ 250.00 3000 ~ ~ 1.32
~.~ 5000 ~ ~ 2.42
6000 ~ ~ 2.84
TOTAL CHARGES $ ~ 7500 ~ ~ 3.26
8000 ~ ~ 3.44
9000 ~ Q 3.82
All fees incurred are per toad unless specified. 10000 ~ ~ 4.33
Terms are net 30 days from date of invoice. ~2000 ~ ~ 4.93
Contractor's signature represents acceptance
of terms for payment, and confirms that tank NO. OF TANKS TOTAL NET TONS
removal complies with State laws. / .
CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE *F -- FIBERGLASS ~-- STEEL 105~
THIS IS TO CERTIFieR RECEI~ AND ACCE~ANCE OF THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED
~ HA~N COMPLETELY DESTROYED FOR SCRAP PURPOSES ONLY.
~ AUTHORIZED REE --DATE
CONTRACTOR COPY
KERN COUNTY
27oo '~' $~ree~:. $~e. ~00
8akersfieJd, CA 93301 Env=on~enml Health Services Oepar~ent
(805) 861-3636
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A9OO-05
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR:
Power Machinery Center Robert Power Fortson Const. &
3818 Pierce Road §4§0 Cam/no Environmental
Bakersfield, CA 93308 Oxnard, CA 8030 Olive Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93308
License #468665
Phone:(805) 485-0577 Phone:(805) 393-4518
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES June 30, 1989
! TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE March 30, 1989
LOCATION APPROVED BY
Dan Starkey
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.
2. A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or inerting and
filling) to arrange for required inspections(s).
3. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action.
4. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health
Department and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook
#UT-30.
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A900-05
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
5. Soil Sampling Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or
constituents to be sampled for which are described below and in Handbook
#UT-30 must receive prior approval by the Health Department.
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or less) - a minimum of two samples must be
retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately
two feet and six feet.
6. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted
by the specialist listed on the permit.
?. Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the
dispenser area(s).
8. Sample analysis
a. Ail waste oil samples must be analyzed for total organic haiides, oil
and grease, and lead.
9. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
10. All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil.
11. Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
12. Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 24
hours advance notice.
Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis
completion.
ACCEPTED BY: DATE
DS:cas
Starkey\AgO0-05
4?on Flown, Street KErlN COUNTY I IEALTH DEPARTMENT HEAOtl OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Heberlson, M.D.
Telephone (805l 861-3636 ENVIRONMEN IAL HEAL3H DIVISION
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
Facility Name Kern County Permit #
~ddress
* * UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION TRACKING RECORD * *
This form is to be returned to tile Kern County liealth Department within 14
_da_~y~ of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling facility. The
holder of tile permit with number noted above Is responsible for insuring
that this form ts completed and retut'ned.
Section I - To be filled out ~ .tj3pJ5 removal 91ontractor:
~'._
0ate 'ro,tks ~e,oved //- ~c/ ~o. or Tanks
Section 3 - To be filled out ~ contractor "decontnmlnatlng tank(si:
· ~ "~ '~ _ Zip
Authorized representative o[ contractor certifies by signing below that
tank{st have been decontaainated in accordance with gem County llealth
0epavtnent requirements.
-~~~~1; lgnature TI ,le
Section 3 -To be ~llled out and ~ ~ a[~ authorized representative o~ the
treatmenq, storage, or dJsposal facility acceptlng,tank(s~:
..
Date Tanks Rece~d ¢~/~--~7 ~. o, ,anks
(Author.lzed Repres(,ntatJve )
· * * 3~ILIN6 INSTRUCTIONS: Fold In ball and staple.
(Forn
DISTRICT OFFICES
FILE CONTENTS INVENTORY "' ·
Facility
Permit to Abandon
Permit to Construct
Permit to Operate
pplication to Abandon / Tank(s) Date ~-~-.~
pplication to Construct
Application to Operate Tank Sheets Plot Plans
Amended Pernit Conditions
Annual Report Forms
Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator .: ·
Inspection Reports ' :'' '':~'-
Correspondence - Received :
Date
Date ·
Date '
Date
Date
Correspondence Mailed
Date "'
Date ..
Date
· . Date
Date
Unauthorized Release Reports
Abandonment/Closure Reports
Sampling/Lab Reports
~VF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
MVF Plan Check (New Construction)
STD Plan Check (New Construction)
NVF Plan Check (Existing Facility)
STD Plan Check (Existing Facility).
"Incomplete Application" Form
Permit Application Checklist
Permit Instructions . Discarded
Tightness Test Results Date
Date
Date "
Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits
Environmental Sensitivity Data:
Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs
Location of Water Wells
Statement of Underground Conduits
Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
Photos Construction Drawings Location:
Nlscellaneous
!~h'TERNAL USE 0NLv' * '
ERR. COUNTY .~LT. D~.P*.T.E.T )TO 0~00, ~_,.~ ,~
.,.,.,..,,..,.o..,~...,...,, i'''''''°''''
(805} 861-3636 [LEH6TH 0F PIPINO T0 ABA~N
APPLICAT[ON FOE PERMIT FOR PER~NENT
CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBST~CES STORAGE FACXL[TY
· .~s ~..uc~m. ~s ~o~ ~ov~e. o. ~ ~e~eo~e.~ ~ .L~Ce ~ 0~ o~ ~.UC~I0..e. ~C~LX~V,
PROJECT CONTACT~ ~[~-C ~~ ~'~~f ISEC/T/R (EU~L LOCATIONS ONLY)
~FACILITY NA~E ' ~DDRESS NEAREST CROSS STREET
PRELI~INARY~ ~ SITE~ASSESSNENT~ CONTRACTOR ~DDRESS[(~'~O ~ ~ PHONE ( )
WORKER'S COMPENSATION · [NSURER PHONE
( ) -
LA~ORATORY THAT WILL ANALYZE SAMPLES {ADDRESS PHONE
CflE~IC&L CO~POSITION OF ~TERIALS STORE~
TANK : VOLU.E CBENICAL STORED (NON-CO~ERCIAL N~E) DATES STORED CHE.ICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED
To
IBASIS FOR SOIL TYPE AND GROUNDWATER DEPTH DETERMINATIO~
~gSCRIB~ HOM RESIDUE IN TANK(S) AN~ PIPING IS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DIS~OSA~COMPANIES)~
..,, .,... ,,,~.,.~ o, ._ .,... ,,,. o..,,o... ,, .., .. ,o_. ,~-~-,
eH~P-340)~~ ~ ~
(Form
Facility /
. ,' cl >'? .,~.
~Construction Permit ~ Date
~permit to abandon~ No, of Tanks Date
~ended Permit Conditions
~P~mit Application Fo~m, ~,~ .... Tank Sheet's,
~Application to Abandon tanks(s) Date
~Annual ~eport Forms
[~Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator
[-] Inspect ion Reports
[-]Correspondence - Received
Da te
Da te
Date
[]Correspondence - Mailed
Date
Da te
Da te
r~Unauthorized Release Reports
[]Abandonment/Closure Reports
[]Sampling/Lab Reports
rqMVF Compliance Check ('New Constructi'on Checklist)
[~STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
[MVF Plan Check (New Construction)
E]STD Plan Check (New Construction)
[MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility)
[STD Plan Check (Existing Facility)
[.']"Incomplete Application" Form
[]-]Permit Application Checklist
[]Permit Instructions [Discarded
[Tightness Test Results Date
Da te
Da te
[Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits
[]Environmental Sensitivity Data:
[]Groundwater Drilling, 8oring Logs
[]Location of Water Wells
E]Statement of Underground Conduits
[]Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
rqPhotos rqConstruction Drawings Location:
[]Half sheet showing date received and tally of inspection tim~, etc
rqMi scel laneous
1700Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ' HEALTH OFFICER ':'
Bakersfield, Califomla 93305 ... - . . ' LeOn M Hebe~teen, M.D.
*' ': '' ~DIRECTOR OF ENVIR(~NMEI~rAL'
%~;ti~F~F~# E x P x r E S :
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES~~~'~IF/ =
STORAGE FACILITY ~ .NUMBER OF TANKS
FACILITY: I OWNER:
POWER NACHINERY CENTER ] POWER MACHINERY CENTER
3818 PIERCE ROAD I P.O. BOX 392
BAKERSFIELD, CA I OXNARD, CA 93032
TANK # ~IIN YRS1 SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING?
1 UNK WO 3 NO
NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING ...
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERN OF THIS PERMIT
NON--TRANSFERABLE *** POST ON PREMISES
Kern County Health Department Permit No~
Division or Environmental He~' Applicationi
1700 Flower Street, Bakersfieiu 93305
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Type of Application (check'):
[]New Facility ~lModification of Facility ]~Existing Facility [~Transfer of (~nership
A. flaergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days
Type of Business ('check): ~lGas~line Station ~]6ther (deSCribe) ~'~/~;c~p
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [-]Yes ~No
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? [-]Yes ~[No
Facility Address .'~V'~ ~'¥',6~C¢~ ~0 .earest Cross St.
T R SEC (~ural Locations Q~I¥)
B. Water to Facility Provided by ~ i~ Depth to' Groundwater
Soil Characteristics' at Facility: ~]_~a~'~}-
Basis fo,r Soil Type and Groundwater Depth']DeteminatiOns .......
C. Contractor
Address 7. ip . Telephone
Proposed ~tartir~ Date P.roposed Ccmpletion Date "'
Worker's Compensation CertifiCation ! Insurer .......
D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existir~ Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications
Proposed A3 ~ ~
E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
Tank ! Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular ~remitl Diesel Waste
O [] O Cl
Tank t Chemical Stored (non-co~nercial name) CAS t (if kno~m) Chemical Previmml S~ored
(if different)
Transfer
--
of Ownership
Date of ~--ansfer Previous Owner
Previous Facility Name
I, accept fUll'y all o61"ig'ations of' permit~ No. __ i~ed to
· I understand that the Pemittin9 Authority may review and
mod{fy or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~lderijro~d storage
facility upon receivinc3 this c~mpleted form.
This form has been ccmpleted under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledc3e is
true and correct.
Signature ~~ ~~a~ Title M~~.~ Date
h' tJ
TANK ~~|~'~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOh~CH TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
H. 1. Tank is: ~]Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted ~]Double-Wall ~[Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
--_c_arbon Steel O Stainless Steel O Polyvinyl Chloride O Fiberglass-Clad Steel
~] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~uintan [] Bronze oUnknown
[] Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. ~ank~ S~'condarY Contair~nent (J
[]Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner []Lined Vault [-INone ~Unknown
[] Other (descr i be): Manufaeturer:
[]Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
5. Tank Interior Lining
----[~Rabber []Alkyd Ulgpoxy []Phen°lie []Glass []Clay ~tlaltn~
[]Other (describe):
6. Tank Corrosion Protection
--]~GalvaniZed ~ass-Clad []Poly. thylene Wrap Ulvinyl Wral~tm3
~Tar or Asphalt []0nknown f=lNone []Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: []None [2]Impress.d Current Systam ~lSaer'lfl¢lsl
ffe--sLribe' System & gquilx,ent: t~2fi$=7-~ ~tc. 5-7b,~/4~- 7-44~C .,,
7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, a~nd Xnterception
a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitoring'
[]Vadose Zone Monitoring W~ll(s) [2]U-Tub~ Without Liner
U-Tube ~ith Compatible Liner Directin~ Flow to Monitortn~ l~.ll(s)
Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conducttvit~ Sensor'
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank
[] Liquid mtrt~tal & Inspaction Fr~m U-Tube, Monitorir~ W~ll or Annular S~ce
[] Daily Gau~ine3 & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Ttghtn.ss ?e~ttr~
~{ None ~ Onkno~w ["! Other
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Pipll~w
[]Monitoring Staup with Race~y []Sealed Concrete
[']Half-Cut Compalmible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Raceway []Mona
Zflunkno~ [] Other
*IJeSCrtbe Make & Model:
8.
~en Tightness Tested? [qYes []No ~Unknown
Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test
Test Name Testing Company
9. Tank Repair -
---F Ra airod []Yes []No lUnkno n
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
10. Overfill Protection
--~T~aperator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
Float Gau~e []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
Capacitance Sensor [']Sealed Fill Box ~None []Unkno~
Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices
11o Piping
a. U~derground Piping: [qYes ~ [2]Unknown Material
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
[~Pressure I-]Suction ~ [']Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
[]Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current []Sacrificial Anode
[-]Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation [~Vlnyl Wrap ~]Tar or A~lt
{-}Unknown []None []Other (describe):
c. Underground Plpirg, Secondary Containment:
[']Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System [-]None
rlOther {~].~rih~% -.
Permit Questionnaire
Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many
Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits
sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted.
Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before
returning this form with payment:
For PERMIT # 0~-000~/ f~_~
1. Send all information to Owner at the address
listed on invoice (if Owner is different than
Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility
to provide Operator with pertinent
information).
2. Send all information to Owner at the
following corrected address: ~_ ~ .~.
~ . ~/~-
3. Send all information to Operator:
Name:
Address:
(Operator c~n make copy of permit for
Owner).
[]Permit to Operate ~ ~.?~"'_/'?_/~C??'L~.,I Date
[]Construction Permit ~ Date
[-]Permit to abandon~ No. of Tanks Date
[-1Amended Permit Conditions
~'Permit Application Form, / ~ Tan~ 'S~eets. ~]o%
[~Application to Abandon tanks(s) Date
[]-]Annual Report Forms
[]']Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator
[]Inspection Reports
[]']Correspondence - Received
Da te
Da te
Date
[]-]Correspondence - Mailed
Date
Date
Da te
r~unauthorized Release Reports
r-lAbandonment/Closure Reports
[]Sampling/Lab Reports
[-]MVF Compliance Check (New Constructi'on Checkll'st)
[-]STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
~MVF Plan Check (New Construction)
[]STD Plan Check (New Construction)
[]MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility).
r']STD Plan Check (Existing Facility)
r~"Incomplete Application" Form
~Permit Application Checklist
[]Permit Instructions DDiscarded
r'lTightness Test Results Date
Da te
Da te
[]Monitoring~Well Construction Data/[~e'rmits
~Environmental Sensitivity Data:
[]Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs
DLocation of Water Wells
['1Statement of Underground Conduits
DPlot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
[]-]Photos ~Construction Drawings Location:
[]']Half sheet showing date received and tally of inspection time, etc
[-]Miscellaneous
170OFIower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
I NTERI ~I PER.II 'r PER,VII T~050007 C
TO OPERATE :
I S SUED : JULY 1, 1986
E XP I RE S : JULY 1, 1989
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE,
STORAGE FACILITY NUMBER OF TANKS= 1
FACILITY: I OWNER:
POWER MACHINERY CENTER I POWER MACHINERY CENTER
3818 PIERCE ROAD I P.O. BOX $92
BAKERSFIELD, CA I OXNARD, CA 93032
TANK # &~IIN YRSl SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING?
1 UNK WO 3 NO
NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TER~4 OF THIS PERMIT
NON--TRANSFERABLE * * * POST ON PREMISES
DATE PERMIT MAILED: ...
: ~',' : · DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST, RETURNED: .' ,.
Division or Environmental Hea Application ]
1700 Flower Street, Bakersfiel. CA 93305
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Type o__~f Application (check):
[-]New FaCility r~Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility r~Transfer of (~nership
A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days
Type of Business (cheCk): ~lGas~line Station ~(~her (describe)
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? []Yes ~No
Is Tank(s) Used Primaril~v.for Agricultural Purposes? [~Yes ~No
Facility Address ~; "~7~C~ ~0 .
Nearest Cross st C=, f:
T . R SEC (R~al D:~cat[ons ~ly) ~
S. Water to Facility Provided by ("~q ~,c~'~'>~ Depth to' Groundwater '?
Soil Characteristics at Facility ~.~'¢fcj .~
Basis fo.r Soil Type and Groundwater De~)t.~/Determinatfons
C. Contractor
Addr ess Zip Tm le$~om
Proposed Starting Date P.ropose~]' Completion Date
Warker' s Ccmpensati0n certi fication ! Insurer
D. If This Permit Is For ~difica.tion Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe l~odi~ications
Proposed ~ ~ ~
E. Tank(s)~ Store (check all that apply):
Tank ! Waste Product Motor Vehicle Umleaded Regular Premium Diesel Waste
[] O O
e. CbeMcal O~positi~ of l~aterials Stored (not necessary for ~tOr ~hicle f~els)
?a~k ! Cbs~ical Storsd (no.-commercial na~e1 ~ ! (if k~o~I
(if d~f~erent)
G. Transfer of Ow~ership
Date of ~--ansfer Previous Owner
Previous Facility Name
I, accept full~ 'all obiig'atiohs 6f Perml~ N~. __ issued to
· I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and
~odi-fY or t~minate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~erground storage
facility upon receiving this completed form.
This 'form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is
true and correct.
Signat,re ~
Facility Name Permit No.
FO-~ F~ SF. CTION, CH~.~K ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
H. 1. Tank is: []Vaulted []]Non-Vaulted [-]Double-Wall ~[Simgle-Wall
2. ~ Material
--_~_C_arbon Steel [2]Stainless Steel ~lPolyvinyl Chloride []Fiber{~lass-Clad Steel
~ Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~m~in~ [2] Bronze [~]Unkr~own
[] Other (describe)
3. Primar~ Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. Tan___~k ~ con{air~nent
DDouble-Wall nsynthetic Liner []Lined Vault []None ~Unkno~
~Other (describe): Manufacturer:
[~Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
5. Tank Interior Lining
---~Rubber []Alkyd ~Epoxy []~nenolic []Glass I-]Clay ~t~lined
~lOther (describe):
6. Tank Corrosion Protection
--l~Galvanfzed 'l~7~~ass-Clad E]Pol~thylene Wrap []Vinyl Wra~ir~]
~Tar or Asphalt ['~Unknown []None ~Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: [-]None []Impressed Current System ~l~a%rf"f'l¢lai A~ System
~)e--s~ribe System & Equi[:ment: C~;/~-T-~- ~../c $72~7~4~
7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and IntercePtion .
a. Tank: []]Visual (vaulted tanks only) ~]Ground~ater Monitorir~ Wall(s)
[~Vadose Zone Monitorin~ ~ell(s) []U-Tube Without Liner
[-JU-Tube with C(mmpatible Liner Directirg Flow to Monitorirg
[] Vapor Detector* ~ Liquid Level Sensor* [-] Conductivity Sensor'
~ Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank'
[-~ Liquid [%retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitori~ Wall or A~%ular S~mce
? Daily Gau~ir~ & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Ti~htne~ Testin~
None [] Unkno~ ~ Other . . .
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized
~Monitorir~ S~a~p w~th Race~y []Sealed Co~crete
DHalf-Cut C~mpatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Li~ l~ace~y r~
unkno Iii other
*~escribe Make &
8.
Ti h ness sted? []Yes []No Unkno
Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test
Test Name Testin~ C~pany
9, Tank ~
----F epaired? nyes nNo unknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
10. Overfill Protection
~ aTOPeaperator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
F%oat Gau~e []Float Vent Valves []Auto Shut- Off Controls
Capacitance Sensor [-]Sealed Fil 1 Box []None [][]nkno~
Other: List Make & Model F~
a. t]nderground Piping: []Yes ~ []Unknown Material
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
[']Pressure []Suct'i'o~ "' []Gravity Approximate Length 6f Pipe ~
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
[2]Galvanized 'I-]Fiberglass-Clad [-]Imp~essed Current []Sacrificial Ar~
~Polyethylene Wrap []Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wra~ []Tar or Asphalt
DUnknown []None []Other (describe):
C. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Containment:
[]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System [-]None
~Other (describe):
Permit Questionnaire
Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many
Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits
sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted.
Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before
returning this form with payment:
For PERMIT # ~-C~"~J~'''~
1. Send all information to Owner at the address
listed on invoice (if Owner is different than
Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility
to provide Operator with pertinent
information).
2. Send all information to Owner at the
following corrected address:/
~ ~. .... ,/7 ,,,,,/ , ~ ~~-,-
Send all information to Operator:
Name:
Address:
(Operator can make copy oF permit for
Owner).