HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION FILE #6ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT kESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S., Director DA VID PRICE III, RMA DIRECTOR
2700'M" STREET, SUITE 300 ~ Engineering & Survey Servloas Del)m~ment
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ~ Environmental Health Servtr. ea Department
Phone: (805) 862-6700 Plmnnlng Deparlmen!
FAX: (805) 862-8701 Roads Department
April 8, 1996
REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION
Leo Black Estate
Attention Tom Gilbert
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CASE
Location: 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California
Known As: Leo Black Electric
Site No.: 050119
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and 'remedial action for the underground
storage tank(s) formerly located at the above-described location. Enclosed is the Case Closure
Summary for the referenced site for your records.
· Based on the available information, including the current land use, and with the provision that the
information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site 'conditions, no further
action related to the underground tank release is required.
This notice is issued pursuant to a regulation contained in Title 23, California Code of Regulations,
Division 3, Chapter 16, Section 2721(e). (If a change in land use is proposed, the owner must
promptly notify this agency.)
Please telephone Dolores Gough at (805) 862-8728 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Slave McCalley, Director ~..... {
Environmental Health Services g~partment
SMc:DG:jrw
Enclosure
cc: Donna Roberts
Winifred Thomson - Darling, Maclin & Thomson
WZI, Inc.
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
State Board, Underground Tanks Program
(hm~ough\O$O ! 19.a)
. Case Closure Sur, llary
~eaking Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program
~. Aqenc¥ Information Date: .-~/
Agency name: KERAJ COOiOT'Y ~=AJV. HEAl-TH Address'.' 29'00 '~/~4" ST. , .~OI/~
IJCity/b"tate/ZIP: 8AKEI~SFI~I_D , C~ e~301 Phone: /eO~) ~2- ~'700.
L[Respons~lesta~person: l'JO¢..Ol~Ee ~_.~)ClG, t4 Title: /-/~4~.. ,~4ATE..~mC$ ~/~.
II. Case Information
URF filing date: SVVEE~S No:
Respon. sible Parties Addresses j Phone Numbers
Tank No I Size in Gal. Contents Closed in-Place/Removed? Date
Iii. i:i~l~a~ and 8it~ Gharaeterization Information '!:-"
Cause and type of m.l~-<~: G~-r-~O L. i/,Jg '-
,. $itechamcterizationcomplete? ~' No IDam~opm~dbyow~ghtag,.~. .
Monitoring Wells, Installed? C~ No }Number:. ,~Z. )Proper screened ~tmval? L~ No
Most Sensitive CurmntUse: G~OO~ODWAT'~' -- ~rG ,' 5177E ---' qC,,t~
Is surface water affected? Yes ~(~ I Nearest/affected SlN nam.: -'
Off-site beneficial usa impacts (addresses/locations):
Treatment. and Disposal of Affected Material
Matedai IAmount (Include units)l Action (Treatment or DLspo .salw/Destination) ' Date
Piping
Frae Product
Groundwater
Barrels
Exhibit. N Page ~ of 2
~ Case Closure Summary i~' J=age2 ~,~..
Lel~lr,~ Underground Fuel Storage TanEqBr~gram
iil. Release and Site characterization Information 'Continued'
!MaximUm DocUmented Contaminant Concentrations ----'Before and/,fief Cleanup
'~ontarr~inant ~'il (ppm) Water (DDm) Contaminant: 6oil (0omi Water (pl3m)
Before i Al*mr Be/ore ,After u~itom I Alter Before [ Attar
TPH(Gas) ,'oo'7~ j ~ '7.~ ! ~ · Xylerm
TPH (Diesen I -- t /,Jg I ' 2, ~I /0{~ Ethylbenzene ~2z~ / ~D /JO
Benzene I~/,(, Il /J~ ~Jo I ~JC~
Toluene I qOct ~JDI /,jlp I ~0 Heav~ metaZs
Othe~ i ~ I -- I I O~er -- ,
Comments (Depth of Remediation, etc.):
IV. Closure
Does completed corrective action Protect existing beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? ~ee No
:)oes completed corrective action protect potential beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? e~ No
Does correct,ye action protect public health for current la~d use? ~ No
Site management requirements: .. /JO/OE '"
Should corrective action be reviewed if land use changes? Yes ~
Monifl3ring wells Decommisioned: Yes No I Number Dec~mmis~ned: j Number Retained:
List enforcement actions taken: :
'List enforcement actions rescinded: "
V. Local Agency Representative Data
Io, :
Vi. RWQOB Notification
[Date S~m~ ~ RB:
Vii; AdditiOnal Comments, Data, etc.
a~ ~ ot thc o~:i~l sim Ede. 8/24/93
Exhibit. N Page 2 of 2
[ Case Closure Su(i ary
· t. ea~dng Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program
I. Agency Information - * · o,te: ~/'/
[IResp, ons~lestaJfpemon: 0~OA'JE<J C~gO/.G~4 ITitJe: ~E:. MA, T'~/,4,L$ '~F'~., ,,
I!. Case Information
Site facility name: L~O ~LA C,~ ELEOI"~/C (
Sitef~cilEy~ddmss: ~cj¢ c/ /?IF__.~C.~ ,~. / I~AKEJ254=I EL~ ¢ ¢
.. RB LUSTIS Case No: Local Ca.se No: ' ~(9/J~ I LOP Case No:
URF filing date: SWEEt= S No:
i Responsible Parties Addresses I Phone Numbers
c./o 70M ~/o3~r2r P.'o. ~X/zl, uooF~o~o ~4r~, 44
OOPJ~OA IPOI~ERT~ 1004. /..OP.~__~JF~ ~41~. · ~ ,/,~a,~ 5~l~l,~:~/ C,~{ · ·
Tank No Size in Gal. Contents Closed in-Place/Removed? Date
2 "
III. Release and Site Characterization Information ....
C~use ~nd type of release: O~ ~- / ~JE'
Site characterizaiion comPleba? ,, (~)' No l Oate ~opm'v~l by ov~migh, agency:.
Monitoring Wells Ins~lled? ' (~ No !Number: 8c. I Propar sm-uen~ inter~l?
Are drinking water wells affect=d? Yes ~ I.Squd"r name: .'.
Off-site beneficial us~ impacts (addmsse?/locations):
Report(s) on file? Y~ No }Whore is report(=) flied? E-~Y. /4~F.~4.274
Treatment. and Disposal of Affected Material
Material I A~nount (Include Units) l Action (Treatment or DL~posaJ w/Destination),., Date
Tank ..... IT I U~ (~Jor jo ~ m~)
Piping
Free Product
Groundwater i
Barrels
Exhibit N Page 1 of 2
i~Case Closure Summaryf-~"' Page2
Lea~,,~J~Underground Fuel Storage Tank Pll~ram
i11. Release and Site Characterization Information 'Continued
i Max~murn Documented Contaminant Concentrations ---- Before and After Cleanup
Contaminant _ Soil (ppm) !Water (ppm) I Contaminant Soil (ppmt Water (ppml
Be/ore i Attar i Belore ~Aner I 'Betom I Alter Be'fore I Alter
TPH(Gas) too '/4 I ~ -)., I ~ I Xylerm
TPH(Diesei) I -- I I~r/ i 2,=J I Dp J Eth~lbenzene ~2_~ / /OD /JO
Benzene I 3/,(,, J /,~ ~O I /~)O I Oii&G~ease I~,
Comments (Depth of Remediation, etc.): EXc..~)~
I
IV. Closure
Does completed corrective action Protect existing beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? (~ No
Does completed corrective action protect potential beneficial uses per the Regional Board Basin Plan? e~ No
Does corrective action protect public health for cun-ent land use? e~ N'o
Site management requirements: '/OO/~.)E "
Should corrective action be reviewed if land use changes? Yes ~
Monitoring wells Decommisioned: Yes No I Number Decammisioned: I Number Retained:
Ust enforcement actions ~ken: . ir fl
CO/Z,~EC.Z'7VE ,4C7-/0~ O,eO~,e /~5{,)Ep tM . lqclo·
Ust enforcement actions rescinded:
V. Local Agency Representative Data
VI. RWQCB Notification
IJ Date Submitted to RS: J FIB Response:
I RWQCa St~ Name: I Title: I Date:
VII.' .Additional Comments, Data, etc..
I/JE.~.L.~ V,)lz-L ~ ,4~,,~/,)OOA.)E.O F'~'/orz 7'0 /~O,e~C.E O~ C.z.O~EI~E ~.~-~.
~ docum¢,,, -,,d lbo ~!~;~d CA.S~ CLD~Ui~ I..ETT~I~ ,h.i, be mt.~a~d by Lira ~ a~en~
Exhibit: N Page 2 of 2
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TA~SE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT PHONE SIC-~NA'I'URE
REPRESENTING [] OWNER/OPERATOR [] REGIONAL BOARD I COMPANY OR AGENCY I~E
[] LOCAL AGENCY [] OTHERI KERN CO. ENV. HEALTH SERVICES
ADDRESS
2700 "M" ST., STE. 300, BAKERSFIELD, CA 9330]
~TREET CITY STATE ZIP
NAME I CONTACT PERSON [ PHONE
LEO BLACK ESTATE [] UNKNOWN TOM GILBERT ( )
ADDRESS
?. O. BOX 121, WO~:~r [-]EIGHTS, CA 93285
FACILITY NAME {IF APPLICABLE) OPERATOR I PHONE
LEO BLACK ELECTRICI ( )
ADDRESS
3909 PIERCE RD., ~FIELD, KE~N COUNTY, 93308
crl'~ COUNTY
CROSS STREET
LOCAL AGENCY AGENCY NAME CONT~T PERSON PHONE
KE~ CO. ~XlV. HF_J~T[-i SEEVICES DF_,~. DOLDRES COUGH (B05 ) 862-8700
REGICNAL BOARD PHONE
~1) NAME QUANTITY LOST (GALLONS]
CASOL[NP.
DATE DISCOVERED I HOW DISCOVERED [] INVENTORY CONTROL [] SUBSURFACE MONITORING [] NUISANCE CONDITIONS
0 .] 2 MI t~ 0 ol 8 '1 7 '1 [] TANK TEST ~ TANK REMOVAL [] OTHER
DATE DISCHARGE aEC, A. M~THOO USED TO STOP D~SCHARGE (CHECK ~-L THAT APPm
~ .I 01 ol .I .] ~ UNK.OW. [] REMOVE CO~NTS I--~CLOSETANK' REMOVE' [] REPA,.P,P,NG
HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ? [] REPAIR TANK [] CLOSE TANK & FILL IN PLACE [] CHANGE PROCEDURE
[~YES [] NO IFYES. OATE 0,12 ~ 1 ~0 ~ 8 ,17 , r--I REPLACE TANK []OTHER
[] TANK LEAK [] UNKNOWN [] OVERFILL [] RUPTURE/FAILURE [] SPILL
[] P~P,NGLE~K [] OTHE. [] CO..OSIC. ~ UNKNOWN [] OTHER
CHECK ONE ONLY
[] UNDETERMINED [] SOIL ONLY [] GROUNDWATER [] DRINKING WATER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN AFFECTED)
CHECK ONE ONLY
[] NOAO~ONT~. -[] P.~,M'NARYS'~A~ES~MENTWO.K"~NSUEM,.ED [] 'POLLUT,O.C~RACTER,Z~T,ON
[] LEAK BEING CONFIRMED [] PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT UNDERWAY [] POST CLEANUP MONITORING IN PROGRESS
[] REMEDIATION PLAN [] CASE CLOSED (CLEANUP COMPLETED OR UNNECESSARY) [] CLEANUP UNDERWAY
CHECK APPROPRtATE ACTiON[S) [] EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) [] REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) [] ENHANCED BIO DEGRADATION (IT)
[] CAP SITE (CD) [] EXCAVATE&TREAT(ET) [] PUMP&TREATGROUNDWATER(GT)[] REPLACE SUPPLY (RS)
[] CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) [] NO ACTION REQUIRED (HA) [] TREATMENT AT HOOKUP (HU) [] VENT SOIL (VS)
[] VACUUM EXTRACTiVE) ~'~ OTHER(Om) ~IO~[~X:)R GRO[J~DWATgR
CASE C~OSED 04/08/96.
' ' ~ , ;' ~ ........ ~--. , ~':~-~:~[~ / O~VJO~l j .." , ' ; ' , " '": ', '~(:'..-:" ·
'---w~--z.-~' . ~ ..... - ~ { , . [0 , , L~a~ ~ein~ Co~[m~d ~ ueak~ susp_.c~e~ at, ~ibe b~t, ~as no~ .been coni[rmed.
..... ~'~he .... ~erg~,:cy re~!:,~>n~;e r~e~'~=~au~e and equ[~n~ we.re ~nvolv~m ~ L' [ ',. ~ P.reiimznar]~ ~be Assessnen~ ~o.r~lar'Submibbec -~'kpJmn/propesal
'-. ~-,~ ~.~ if so, ~ ~za!'dous bk~h~:[aj. !r~<:~dent,Report should be fiq. ed ~ - ~ ' J ~ r~estedkof/suDmibted by responsible.pe~%,; to.-d~beimi]~e whether
. ~t,h ...... 5t.at.~ ; ic~ ,.~ un:erae~:v .-?:r'~ ~'e:, O~c ) at 2800 Meado~wiew,Road 3 . , ~ wa~e,' he, been 'or wi~i be impacted as a res.lttof'.the re[ease
your S,, ~' -~ub>~round st~:a~e Lauk p~m~.tt~z~ ~ceacy. 'Indicaq~e whe~,ber {J ..< } [ ~;~O~~~za~.i6n =-:resp~ible.--~a'~t.~/~;in bh~pro~e'ss of fu!iv
' _ ~ , : . i 'b i impacts 'on surface and/or grounct water, r ',,~
~C a"gio d'~i;~ 3~:,~C notif.isa%'.i, on p~rsuhut to lea]th 'aha ~afetv code Section l ' j ..... {_~ ~}.~io~pblons, i Proposal~and iaPkenen:~a io~',scheckle fo~ a~propri ~e,
..... ~ · ,, .. ,:t,-er;:men~.. emDl.ovee z::~cml, d :c;on < ~a aate the fc,rm"in th,s}b]ock' ~ [ t r~edlat:ion op~'onS also submztted ., i': ;.'. ' ;
;.. si. gna~ure b?re Joea not mean that the [,, ',k baa been d~t, ermin'ed to 6ose'aI ' ~ ~ C~eanu= ~Unde~wa9 -~5~!ementatton of' remediation l~>lan ; ~ '
z~n,:ica~t th.~d, t'> human bealtk or aa .Lv on]~ tha~ noti'~icationl . ' ~' { ~ i P6st ~l~;a~ Monito}i;~g in Progress - ~eriodic g{otmd wa~er or other
[q!~q~',.]~j[~7 · . ~': }$ .-. ~ ~! C~s~ Clo'sel - regioh~l bdard:and i.ocii agency in conc~'zence tibet
'x~er 7c':~ ,( .... . ~i :.n~ n;~l ~. ar~ ;~ 'h'(s~ Ir, dica~e which r~a,'i{~'ou. {' ~{ r,irtheri~'ork is necessary at' the s.te .." '-~ I i : ::.
~ ' . , : ' ~ {-; . ; { ~iIMPOR~ANT:~ THE ~INFOFaTION ~OVIDED ON THIS FO~i IS II'ENDED: F~ GENERAL
='~-'~"-.:~!~_..l.~,Lu ~ : '. ~ } I ~STATI~IC~ PUR~S~S ON[,~ B~O IS NOT TO BE CONbTRL~D ~S' RW~R~E~iNG THE i
j,,sp':,ml~.,~ fo., ~ e i~-~k. 'fbc. -c~z~>:,~ r ' L-. 'p~rt? would normallS~ be tg~ t~ ' [ ~ i" !' : . t ._ :;' 5' r ~ .. ~, '.. '
, - · ' ~, ~l Indicate Which a tl,-n have been t,s~- ~o'c]=ant, o~:'-~eaia+e tl,= aeak
'c-~ r ~:...~. , ~ , ~, -; ~.~ I .i: ?' . ' ;~'. : .... : 'P' ~ 2' '"- -r-~'~, "r~; ' - ·
r':ter ~'n:~,rme~ :.,:. r~:a!'ai:~g ~'.!:~ L:~i:k fo~ i lit".'. A~ a minimum, you mu~t ~ ~ { ' ~ , ---~j ~ ~ i ~ ~ : .~ :N ~: =,' .. -~ , ,
' : , ~ ' [ i I infi.l..tzation. } >{ ~ .: { ' k ; -. u ., .~ ·
2.=[J:.z .?~ A(:EN~.~;~ · ' · i" ~;, : - · : I Co~ai.nm~ng Barrier ~ insta]~l vert)ical, dike-to-b~ock horizonte~ movenent of
;r, te,' p~ ef-.th'~~ -,-=1 =~<,.~ ...... ' ~' - ; ,' ,- ? :~ ~ · · ~ '--' : { '"~i ~ .:'~. ~'~.i . ; " I ' . ! : '5 r : .~
.... · -- = / ' ' " ' ' ;.,- '-' ' '' ; t u. -.. i~. r ~.~ .= i' · "' ' . . ... : -~:
!::;:_~:;J~:S ilr~J:::f,r:! - . "L ' :' ' .. : b- u: t ! E~,ar, e.~d~!r~-~ove cont. am~nated;soiI and'tr~aE (fnciudea
i: provide0 for~."-~ ~.=.,.,=~ 5.,:n ci~ ",',~ :::{bstauce,; .....:r'apurot:.~ji. at~.,:~ Tr me~, theft R~ee Fr~e 'Product ~ remove floatin~ product :fr~swager':t, abl'e}.
i ..-~ s'd~f n;ict}s leak,,~i, ]tst:. :[:,:. ~,,:o of .'~.~s' <oncern fo~ .c].ean{~p. { _ i Pt~np an<l~Teat Gro{mdwater - g~nera] lv emplove'd to:~emove dissb].ved
, = g~enced 'Blodegradatlon r use of any}aval:abi~ t.~<,~oto~y_ ~o
-. i' ! i ' Tz~atment<at- ~- ~ lnsta~ water 5reatment :devi 8~s:sat,'~ach dwellina or
:li:,'i.e scu=c>(s .of ''a:' ,"; ...... }),:.>:<o,: ir~dica~ins ca~se .... leak. ~ othe: 'rlace o: use~ ; r, ~ -= , , , _-
~ i I ~ac~unl nxtracc ~ use ~p} or ~l. owers to'draw ai~ through soil.
"' . No Aktion--.Re~.~ifed - ~nci-dent is minor re~ir~,g {~*~ remm:ia~
· :~"i: F,:-'ti,~ ,.,~,~ ,.r . ,,,-,;or=' ~':,t ~t: ,.,<,~. C:~i~ck o~e box bn.l.y. {Ca~, ...... ~''" ' '' ' ' '' ..... '
~ -~ 'f; ~-m~ t.l} ibc moT]~ :?I-;5if i-7~ :'e-' '-:',.s affected ?)r exampl.e ',if ! x iix z . ~i ~, ; ... i . . .
: :..e: Ind{cat.') "{',. ',F?:' ig;-~:'" ~:':l" ~' cue or'more ~.mi.ci~>~).. or ~ { ' ~: '; ~ ..... ' .... - }' . . i' "
9d ~ ;!:'inkS:::: , ' ':, ~,,L · '..:.. :.i~{ ..... .~'.~{' ',:elis have }:or :'~t, been {u' ., . ....
.. q",v change u~>n :u.t'tJ~er }} m :ir thai rom ,is' comn}eted ~y ~e ~i~r~ ,-~i~- o~-!,i~ ai.~;.F -e~', ~'h~ ~
'r~' i:'LJ;)t'. : . {q ~:, ,~ '- .t : . ; ' ' . , ; ; . ' ~., ...... ""?'%' ~ '-'~r ................. .'~'.r
='~' ';... :-o~. ,-:,' ...'i ': '" i ' :'~ ' t.~;v<< L~, i;h~ cese typ_,. 'Fo,: N!,.~ L' U~ir~r<J{md.L,... , ~}:oilge; ~, Tank~ Pre~,~m_.: , P O.~ ....... :~ ....~'~,~,Zl'Ja ..................... TM 'r ........ , , rl ....=,r,'-,: -. ..
'il- . ' 5:ti3 · ~ '' ' ';n · ; :u! o.r-c~.e,.nu,,,~ ~ '" a&-; ---.,-r<- *- to = ,,. geg~:~a~wat, er ~al.ttv Control ~Board; ,. : · ,:
. · '. q Y,. ~e~.~. ii~61.th,Officer and County ~ ai'(I · f S: ~,r,'~'i-~ ,- .... ~., r d~= -= ---
{ ~ .-~ ! = '''. · ':: · :" .-. ' .... ' ....... i'--" .............
t
: . ....... ~ ....... t ....... i .... L . : .... :_' ....... ": .t . _ .i . . i , '
~nv~onmen~al Health ~e~-~m Dept.
Beke=~eld, CA ~330~
· ~one (80s) 86~-~s3s Pe:~ # PU~I7~0-08
APPLICATION FOR ~E~IT TO
CONS~UCT, ~CONS~UCT, DEEPEN OR D~S~OY A ~LL
~dd=ms~ i00~ Lorene Avenue· cl~y~ Bakersfield Z~p: 93308
DaILLZNG CONT~CT~R,: .Melton Dri!iin~ .... Phone:805~89-0~2!
Add=ass: 710l Do'~ing Avenue , CZar%_ Bakersfield zip: 93308
$UBCONT~CTOR~
............. Phone:
Ad~cmss: CL~y: Z~p:
SZ~ ~u~ss ~ available : 3909___ Pier~e Road, Bakersfield TO=~AC~S: 0.9~
D~C~ZONS =o Well Si=e: Enter site off west sf~= o~ Pierce Road. Three monltorin~ well
~ 0~ wo~ ~0 B~ DO~: (che=k one] ~ New we~l ~ Deepen
~ Domesctc/pg~va~e (I Connection) ~ Revecse Ro~a~y
~ Domestic/nonpublic (2-4 connections) ~ Ro=a~
~ Tee= Hole ...........
~ Cachod/o
MA~'ER:A.Tu (check one) ORJW'~ pACE: (check one) PROPOSED
NeaC cemefl~ ~e ~xi~
Camenc Ggou~ ~ Yea 0 Mo DL~Gce=
Conc=e=e F=oM Tf To h0', Feet Doth "'
~auqe/WaL~
PHoPos~ ~ PROPOSED PE~O~TXONS
CONS~U~ZON (D~) ~A OR s~, ~A OR
/ PROPOSED
~ax. ~ee~ ~=om To Fee~ / Annu~a~ ~enen~ ~o s~race
~Ln. gee~ F=om ' '
PROPOSED ~.?. DES~U~ZON
AQUX~ Nell Depch ~0
Yes ~' No k ~!sI each h~dee~
~S ~PLICA~ON BECOMES A PE~IT ~N APPRO~D
~NE~AL, CONDITIONS:
~ , ~ ~ e ~mniflg ~e~4n~ent
4. Other ~equire~ inflect/oAs include: se~im~ cum~ucto~ easing, E.~oGs, all ~n~uJat seals, an= final.con~t~tiofl fea~oe.
Of any Oasis ar ~lu~5,
Sa~as ~e~a~ent w~thJ~ 30 ~ays after CompLetion of th~ work.
I !. "~ry' boise muaf be p~ge~ly de~troVe~ within cwo C~) week~ ef drilling, A well destruction a~licafion must be filed with thle
I ce~ify that t am the Owner of :he above-described Orooe~y, or t~e authorized representative of such owner, and
I furnished ail of the a~o~e information and JntenO tO construct/destroy T~e well as reOresented 'above. I understar
~at all work is t~be done in accordance wit~ Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 1 4.08 and Bulletin 74-81 and
comdit{ons of the Permit Ap~lication inclualng any conditions which may be added or changed by The Environmen;
Health Services De~a~meht u=on review of this A~0ficatien sn~ issuance ~f the Perm{t, t fu~er understand that ar
~ermJt ~ssued ~utsuant to chis ~plication is subjec~ to such lumber conditions as mav be deemed necessaW To [nsu:
c~m~llanca .with the pe~inen~ regulations.
Owner's
Si Data
IN'
__ Total Fe~:_ Da.ts
Date: ..R~cei~T · o Cas_b D Check'?~
ZONING ENVIRONMENTAl. HEAL~ SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Zone:: E-Log Required: ~ Yes o No
Access Agprove~: = Yes ~ No
Flood Plan A~roval ReQuired: ~ Ye~ ~ No Gravel Chute Required: Q Yes m No
~ APPROVED = DISAPPROVED
DATE:
REASO FOR DE /AL OR COeD~TICkS OF PER /T:
I I ._ I I II I I I ~ ~111 III
_... %F'~' OS '96 09:41AM WZT.fI P.1
I 4700 StockdaIe Highway. S~te 120
Post Off,ce Box 9217
Bakersheld, Califorma 93389
805/328-1112 805/326-0191 FAX
WZl
FAX LEAD SHEET
. ~ :~ ....... ___.__
Message'. ,,~/, ~--~ ,~C,,"/
¢ ,,~.,;,,,.,~,,,_._ '~ll~ ~ ~__ ~ ~1.~. ~,~..
Total Number of Pages, Include Cover Page:
Date Transmiffed: ~/~ ~ ....
F~ Number: ~,- ~ ~ /
File Number: ~20~, 0o1
CONFIRMING TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (805) 3~-6-1112
WZI INC. FAX NUMBER I$ (805) 326-01~J1
Opec: Date Sent: ._..-. Time Sent; Initials: .... _.. Return Original: Y N Copy Sender: Y N
~m~ 02 '96 0~:~2~M M~I II~C P.~
~?00 '~' ~C~ee~ ~Ce 300 " --
Bakersfield, CA 9330~
Phone (80S) 86~-3636
LOCATION .
/ ~;~
a. ~OCA~O~ OF ~L~ WZ~H~ sEc~o~ ~H~S--Locate we~ ~ measuring f~om pFOpoeed ;~Ce ~fl
..... ~ I ' -- -
i
I
,
i -- Se~ "'
N~.
M L K ~ J
t
' I
N, P Q ~ R
~ ,
1 - Ooa MUa ,, -I
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S., Director ~ DA VID PRICE III, RMA DIRECTOR
2700'M". STREET, SUITE ~00 ~ Engineering & $ur~ey Servl~ Department
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ~ Environmental Health Servicee Department
Phone: (805)862-87o0 Planning Department
FAX: (805) 862-8701 Roads Department
March 14, 1996
Ms. Winifred Thomson
Darling, Maclin & Thomson
P. O. Box 2411
Bakersfield, CA 93303
SUBJECT: Correcti°n to March 12, 1996, Correspondence for Leo Black Estate, 3909
Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA - (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Ms. Thomson:
Attached, pleaSe f'md a corrected copy of our March 12, 1996, letter regarding
requirements to close the subject site. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have
caused, and if you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805)
862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gougl/
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management 'Program
DG:ch
Attachment
gough\050119j4.clt
ENV~RON~IENTAL H~_.~_~_ ~~ES DEPAFITMF. NT (-"a~E$OUFICE MANAGEMENT AGENC;'
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S.;' ~gl~Jctor v DA VID PRICE III, RMA DIRECTOR
2700"M" STREET. SUITE 300 ~ Engineering & Survey 8ervleea Department
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ~ Envffonmental Health S®rvfeea Department
Phone: (605) 662-8700 Planning Departnlenf
FAX: (805) 862-8701 Road~ Departmenf
March 13, 1996
Ms. Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Investigation, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Ms. Roberts:
The February 1996 groundwater monitoring report prepared by WZI Inc. has been reviewed. The
report results indicate none of the petroleum hydrocarbon constituents analyzed are present above
detection limits.
Based on these results and all the work conducted at this site, no further sampling or remediation
associated with the underground tank release is required. However, before we can issue the final
closure letter the four monitoring wells on site should be properly abandoned. Prior to beginning
well abandonment activities, a permit from this Depamment must be obtained. '
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
:Do
BY: Dolores Oough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
cc: WZI, Inc.
Tom Gilbert
Wendy Thomson
CVRWQCB
0~0119}l.clt
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~'~/ICES DEPARTMENT ~J~ESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
STEVE · McCALLEY, R.E.H.S., Director ~ DAVID PRICEIII, RMA DIRECTOR
2700 'M" STREET, SUITE 300 ~ Engineering & Survey SMYICOO Department
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ~ Environmental Health Services Department
Phone: (805) 862-8700 Planning Depaflmenl
FAX: (805} 862-8701 Rosdo Department
March 13, 1996
Mr. Allen Waggoner
WZI, Inc.
4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120
Bakersfield, CA 93309
SUBJECT: Correction to March 12, 1996 Correspondence for Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce
Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Mr. Waggoner:
Attached please find a corrected copy of our March 12, 1996 letter regarding requirements to.
close the subject site. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and if you have
any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
BY: Dolores G°ugh
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Ha?.~rdous Materials Management Program
OSO119j3.clt
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~"t~ICES DEPARTMENT ~i~$OU"CE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S., Director ~ DA VIO PRICE III, RMAOIRECTOR
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 ~ Engineering & gurvey Servlcee Department
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ~ Environmental Health S®rvicee Department
Phone: (805) 862-8700 Planning Department
FAX: (805) 862-8701 Road~ Department
March 12, 1996
Ms. Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Investigation, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
The February 1996 groundwater monitoring report prepared by WZI Inc. has been reviewed. The.
report results indicate none of the petroleum hydrocarbon constituents analyzed are present above
detection limits.
Based on these results and all the work conducted at this site, no further sampling or remediation
associated with the underground tank release is required. However, before we can issue the final
closure letter the four monitoring wells on site should be properly abandoned. Prior to beginning
well abandonment activities, a permit from this Department.must be obtained.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
BY: Dolores Gough
'Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
cc: 'WZI, Inc.
Tom Gilbert
Wendy Thomson
CVRWQCB
0~0119j.eli
WZl
February 23, 1996
Ms. Dolores Gough
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: Quarterly Status Report
Leo Black Electric Site, 3909 Pierce Road
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Gough:
Pursuant to your correspondence of January 5, 1996, groundwater monitoring was
conducted at the Leo Black Electric site on February 1 and 2, 1996 to fulfill the
requirement for quarterly monitoring prior to February !5, 1996. This letter report
summarizes the groundwater sampling procedures and laboratory analyses.
Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling
The groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 to MW-4 were sampled on February 1 and 2,
1996. Prior to sampling each of the wells, the depth to water surface below the well
casing survey point was measured with an electric tape sonde with an accuracy of 0.01
foot. Groundwater was then handbailed from each well until at least 3 to 5 well volumes
were removed. Temperature, conductivity and pH of the bailed water were measured
and recorded to establish the stability of the water conditions (Table 1). Groundwater
samples were collected from each of the monitoring wells using disposable plastic bailers
and placed into laboratory supplied 40 mi vials and one liter amber glass bottles that
were treated with hydrochloric acid to prevent volatile organic constituents from coming
out of solution. These samples were analyzed using U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency test methods 8015-modified for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and
diesel fuels, and 8020 for volatile organics.
02060010.037 I
4700 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY, SUITE 120 BAKERSFIELD, CAUEORNIA 93309 (805) 326-1112 FAX: (805) 326'0191
4100 WESTHEIMER, SUITE 231 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (713) 877'1149 FAX: (71.3) 877'1923
All analyses for the samples collected from wells MW-1 through MW-4 were reported to
contain hydrocarbon constituents below laboratory analytical detection limits. Analytical
summaries of samples are contained in Table 2 and copies of the analytical reports are
attached to this letter report.
Groundwater Gradient
A map that depicts the local groundwater' gradient as determined from the four
monitoring wells is attached as Exhibit 1. The gradient map defines a direction of
groundwater flow beneath the site to the southwest with a slope of approximately .015
feet/foot (80 feet/mile).
Planned Work
Groundwater monitoring at the Leo Black Electric site has shown two successive quarters
of hydrocarbon constituent concentrations below laboratory detection limits, therefore,
closure of the groundwater monitoring portion of the site characterization is requested.
Per our conversation of February 5, 1996, this is consistent with the new Regional Water
Quality Control Board Guidelines for Iow risk former underground storage tank sites ·
which do not pose a risk to drinking water wells. As you may be aware, the nearest
water well is located approximately 500 feet from the site.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (805) .326-1112.
Very truly yours,
Allen Waggoner ...
ff Geologist
JAW/er
Attachments:
Table t
Table 2
Exhib~ 1
Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain of Custody Documents
02060010.037 2
TABLE 1
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING - WATER CHARACTERISTIC DATA
WELL SAMPLE DATE pH CONDUTIVITY TEMPERATURE
NUMBER NUMBER COLLECTED (pH units) (uomhs/cm) (degrees F)
MW-1 1 2/1/96 7.86 1.473 64.9
Water Depth (below wellhead): 14.60' 2 2/1/96 7.35 1.506 64.1
Wellhead Elevation (above SL): 402.65' 3 2/1/96 7.37 1.272 63.6
Groundwater Elevation(above SL): 388.05' 4 2/1/96 7.41 1.380 63.7
5 2/1/96 7.38 1.318 63.5
6 2/1/96 7.40 1.400 63.3
MW-2 1 2/1/96 7.56 0.929 61.1
Water Depth (below wellhead): 14.94' 2 2/1/96 7.44 0.884 61.9
Wellhead Elevation (above SL): 404.01' 3 2/1/96 7.50 0.881 62.0
Groundwater Elevation (above SL): 389.07' 4 2/1/96 7.39 0.871 62.5
5 2/1/96 7.51 0.875 62.7
6 2/1/96 7.48 0.876 63.0
MVV-3 1 2/1/96 7.54 0.897 60.8
Water Depth (below wellhead): 15.13' 2 2/1/96 7.51 0.898 61.4
Wellhead Elevation (above SL): 402.83' 3 2/1/96 7.46 0.885 61.2
Groundwater Elevation (above SL): 387.7' 4 2/1/96 7.38 0.881 61.4
5 2/1/96 7.36 0.878 61.7
6 2/1/96 7.32 0.882 62.0
MW-4 I 2/2/96 7.03 0.849 60.6
Water Depth (below wellhead): 15.56' 2 2/2/96 7.33 0.798 60.7
Nellhead Elevation (above SL): 401.93' 3 2/2/96 7.22 0.765 61.9
Groundwater Elevation (above SL): 386.37' 4 2/2/96 7.21 0.757 61.9
5 2/2/96 7.22 0.759 62.2
6 2/2/96 7.53 0.753 62.4
F:\CU ENTS\LEOBLACK~WTRDATA3.WQ2
JAI~ 2/1
TABLE 2
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LABORATORY ANALYSES SUMMARY
WATER SAMPLES FROM MONITORING WELLS
SAMPLE WELL DATE TPH GASOLINE TPH DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENE
NUMBER NUMBER COLLECTED ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I LAB
LB-MW1-2 MW - 1 2/1/96 ND ND ND ND ND ND SHERWOOD
LB-MW2-2 MW - 2 2/1/96 ND ND ND ND ND ND SHERWOOD
LB-MW3-2 MW - 3 2/1/96 ND ND ND ND ND ND SHERWOOD
LB-MW4-2 MW - 4 2/2/96 ND ND ND ND ND ND SHERWOOD
ND = NONE DECTECTED
F:\CUENTS\LEOBLACK~WTERTBL?_WQ2
JAW 2/13~
~'~-~ Sher ~/~v~ood·
Labs .EC~,V~ .~ ~o., ~o.~. ~. ~v~
· P.O. BOX 937
C O R P O R A T IO N FEB 1 2 1996 HILMAR, CALIFORNIA 95324
WZI INC.
02/07/96 OHS ¢ertif£cation # 1400.
~NALYSIS REPORT: BTEX/Total Petro. Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
CLIENT: WZI INC
PO BOX 9217
Bakersfield, C~ 93389
~tn: Allen Naggoner
Project Name: Leo Black Estate Bate Sampled: 02/0~/96
02/02/96
Date Received: 02/03/96
Date Started: 02/05/96
Date Completed:02/06/96
Sampled By: Allen Waggoner
Lab Report #: H6020505
BTEX TPH-Gasoline
RESULTS: EPA 602 EPA 5030/8015(M)
ug/L .ug/L
Ethyl Total
Benzene, Toluene, Benzene, Xylene TPH
PH6020633 ND<,3 ND<.3 NO(.3 NO(.3 N0~50
LB-M~l-2
PH6020634 NDe.3 ND<.3 NB(.3 NDe.3 NB(Se
LB-HN2-2
PH6020635 NDe.3 NDe.3 NB(.3 .ND(.3 NB<50
LB-HN3-2
PH6020636 NO(.3 NDe.3 NDe.3 ND(.3 N0<50
LB-NN4-2
Gloria Polin ,
Laboratory Director
OFFICE: (209) 667-5258 · FAX: (209) 667-2581 . BBS: (209) 667-4119
Sherwood
Labs
C 0 R P 0 R A T I 0 N P.O, BOX937
HILMAR, CALIFORNIA 95324
02/06/96 OHS Certification #: 1400
ANALYSIS .REPORT: Total Recoverable Petro. Hydrocarbons
CLIENT: WZI INC ~
PO BOX 9217
Bakersfield, CA 93389
Attn: AIien Waggoner
Oate SampIed: 02/01/96
02/02/96
Project Name: Leo Black Estate Date Received: 02/03/96
Date Started= 02/05/96
Sampler: Allen Waggoner Date Completed:e2/06/96
Lab Report ~: H6020505
RESULTS= TEPH-Biesel, Kerosene, Dielectric and Hotor Oils
EPA 351e/sezs(M)
ug/L
PH6020633 ND(Se All Analytes
LB-MW1-2
PH6020634 ND(50 All Analytes
LB-NW2-2
PH6020635 ND(50 AiI AnaIytes
LB-N~3-2
PH6020636 ND<Se All Analytes
LB-M~4-2
Gloria Poling
Laboratory Director
OFFICE: (209) 667-5258 · FAX: (209) 867-2581 · BBS: (209) 667-4119
JAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUM~IIII' ~ ~-(")~'
WZI INC.
( t Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
805/326-1112
Sample Type: (check one)
Drinking Water Sudace Water Waste Water Oil Soil
Sludge~ ~her (specify) 6'~o~ ~ ~ ~
Sample Description(s): ~ ~/ ~o~'s ~) ~o~ ~
Sample Number Date Colle~ed Collectors Name Type of Analysis
Sample(s) Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Sample(s) Received by: ~/~' ~ Date: . , Time:
Sample(s) Relinquished to Lab by: ~.~'~-., ~/~-~~ Date:~~'~
L nple(s) Received in Lab by: --'//.,//z:32'.,/ffz
' .
Sample Condition When Received By Lab: '
Name o, Lab: ~.'~.~r~'r"~o ~,
REE£
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
MW- ;J+ 'MW-2
$87.7'
PROPERTY
LIMIT OF 1993 .'~
FORMER EXCAVATION ;i
AERATION PILl=
389.00'
BOX
~' ° 388.50'
. ~ FORMER
AERATION PILE
388.00'
~ 387.50'
BUILDING .~i
387.00'
LEO BLACK PARCEL
WZI INC.
BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA
FENCE J LEO BLACK ELECTRIC '
LEGEND I 390g PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA
I
3~aM. OW5'~- GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION I GROUNDWATER
I ELEVATION MAP
o lo 2o' AND GROUNDWATER SURFACE ELEVATION
[-- ' ' IDATE 2/96 10206.00101EXHIDIT 1
Scale In Feet
STD,/E McCALLEY, R.E.H.S.
DIRECTOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS c O U N T
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Environmental
2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT Health
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Services
(805)861-3636 Department
(805)861-3429 FAX
PERMIT #: MW 1531-05
OWNER'S NAME: Leo Black Estate MW 1532-05
MW 1533-05
FACILITY NAMe: Leo Black Electric MW 1534-05
FACILITY LOCATION: 3909 Pierce Road
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger
CONTRACTOR: Melton Drilling LICENSE NO.: C 57 - 508270
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR WZI, Inc.
TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) Groundwater
NUMBER OF WELLS REQUII~D TO MONITOR FACILITY: Four (4)
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT:
1. Weft site approva~ is required before be0inning any work related to well construction. ~t is unlawful to
continue work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed.
2.Other required inspections include: conductor casino, afl annular seals, and final construction features.
3. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and
24 hours before the p~acement of any sea~s or plu§s.
4.Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions bY Department representatives.
5. AH wells constructed of PVC located at a contaminated site where de0radation may occur must be
destroyed after 2 years or prove no de0radation is occurring or has occurred.
0. Any misrepresentation or noncompliance with required Permit Conditions or Ordinance will resuR in
issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER."
7. A copy of the Department of Water Resources Drifter's Report, as well as copies of ;ogs and water quafiW
analyses, must be submitted to the Hea[th Department within 14 days after completion of the work.
8. A well destruction appficafion must be filed with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not
in coniunction with a test ho;e permit.
0. The permit is void on the ninetieth 100} calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started
and reasonable progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
10. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Approved Annular Seal Depth Approximately 37 Feet.
THIS PERMIT MUST BE SIGNED BY EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE ~'~ACTOR'S SleI~[A~dRE : DATE
PERMIT APPROVED BY: 7'~0 ~//~
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
DATE: September 19f 1995
DO:cas
~gough\1531-05h.m4~
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S.
DIRECTOR C O U N T Y
Environmental
2700 'M" Sb'eet, Suite 300 Health
Bakerdietd, CA 93301 January 5, 1996 Services
~o5~-3636 Department
(805)861-3429 FAX
Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Soil and GroUndwater Assessment, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA
Dear Ms. Roberts:
The report prepared by WZI Inc. for additional soil and groUndwater assessment at the
subject property has been reviewed. The following summarizes the information provided
and our comments.
Last September, four groUndwater monitoring wells were installed on site in an effort to
further investigate groUndwater quality beneath the site. Soil samples were retrieved
during drilling and two were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene and TPH
as gasoline and diesel. Analytical results indicate these chemicals were not present above
detection levels. They were also not foUnd in the groUndwater samples collected fi.om the
four wells sampled.
During the installation, groUndwater was encoUntered at approximately 15 feet below
groUnd surface. In 1993 during soil excavation, groUndwater depth was approximately 45
feet.
All the impacted soil that remained on site for remediation was also sampled and analyzed
during this phase of the investigation. Laboratory results indicate only low levels of diesel
and motor oil (5 to 39 ppm) were present in the soil. Based on these results, all the soil
was allowed to be used as backfill to the excavation pit.
WZI recommended that no additional investigation or excavation is needed at the site.
However, the wells should be sampled quarterly until four successive results show the
contaminants are below detection levels. In reviewing the results of all work completed
to date, this Department concurs with WZI's recommendation. The next monitoring event
should be initiated no later than February 15, 1996.
Donna Roberts
Re: Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Sanuary 5, 1996
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this matter, you can contact me at (805) 862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: WZI Inc.
Wendy Thompson
Tom Gilbert
CV RWQCB
gough\050119i.¢1t
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H;S.
DIRECTOR C 0 U N T Y
Environmental
2700 'M" Sb'eet, Suite 300 Health
Bakersfield, CA 93301 January 5, 1996 Services
(805)861-3636 Department
(805)861-3429 FAX
Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Soil and Groundwater Assessment, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA
Dear Ms. Roberts:
The report prepared by WZI Inc. for additional soil and groundwater assessment at the
subject property has been reviewed. The following summarizes the information provided
and our comments.
Last September, four groundwater monitoring wells were installed on site in an effort to
further investigate groundwater quality beneath the site. Soil samples were retrieved
duringdrilling and two were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene and TPH
as gasoline and diesel. Analytical results indicate these chemicals were not present above
detection levels. They were also not found in the groundwater samples collected from the
four wells sampled.
During the installation, groundwater was encountered at approximately 15 feet below
ground surface. In 1993 during soil excavation, groundwater depth was approximately 45
feet.
All the impacted soil that remained on site for remediation was also sampled and analyzed
during this phase of the investigation. Laboratory results indicate only low levels of diesel
and motor oil (5 to 39 ppm) were present in the soil. Based on these results, all the soil
was allowed to be used as backfill to the excavation pit.
WZI recommended that no additional investigation or excavation is needed at the site.
However, the wells should be sampled quarterly until four successive results show the ,
contaminants are below detection levels. In reviewing the results of all work completed
to date, this Department concurs with WZI's recommendation. The next monitoring event
should be initiated no later than February 15, 1996.
Donna Roberts
Re: Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
January 5, 1996
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this matter, you can contact me at (805) 862-8728.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: WZI Inc.
Wendy Thompson
Tom Gilbert
CV RWQCB
goush\050119i.clt
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
{805) 861-3429 FAX
April 10, 1995
Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert & Donna Roberts
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Assessment and Interim Remedial Action Workplan for
Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Mr. Gilbert & Ms. Roberts:
The. subject workplan prepared by WZI Inc. has been reviewed. The proposed tasks including
the methods of implementation are acceptable to this-Department.
In regard to the stockpiled soil, 'sampling should be conducted before interim remedial action is
initiated to determine if any volatile organics remain in the soil. We recommend retrieving a
minimum of three samples composited to one for every 50 cubic yards.
The field work for this phase of the investigation must be initiated within 60 days from the date
of this letter. Please notify this office at least 48 hours prior to beginning any sampling and/or
drilling activities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805)
861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Oough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: WZI Inc.
Central Valley KWQCB
gough\050119f, clt
O~ECTOR C 0 U N 'T y
Environmental '(i**,**~ ~ *'.
2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 Health
Bakersfield, CA 93.301 Services
(805)861-3636 Department
(805)861-3429 FAX
July 10, 1995
Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Street
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Stockpiled Soil Analysis, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
(Permit No. 050119)
Dear Ms. Roberts:
The laboratory results of thc samples retrieved from thc soil piles at the Leo Black Estate have
· been reviewed.' As discussed, the soil may be used as backfill to the existing excavation at the
site.
:, Following completion of backfilling activities, implementation of the workplan recently approved
't
may be initiated. If you have any questions regarding this matter,. I can .'be reached at
(805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
, By: Dolores Gough
' Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: Tom Gilbert / Donna Roberts · Wendy Thompson
~gough\050119-2.clt
STE~ McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. t'~, t~'~
D~-CTOfl C 0 U N T '~
Environmental
2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 Health
Bakersfield, CA 93.301 Services
(1to5)861-3636 Department
18o5)861-3429 FAX October 9, 1995
Allen Waggoner
WZI, Inc.
P. O. Box 9217
Bakersfield, CA 93389
SUBJECT: Soil and Groundwater Sampling Results, Leo Black Estate, Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Waggoner:
We have reviewed the laboratory results of the soil (drill cuttings) and groundwater samples.
collected from the newly installed monitOring wells. Based on our review, this Department
approves of your plan to spread the cuttings on site. The water may be left to evaporate on site
or used for dust control during the soil spreading activities.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, you may contact us at ('805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
~Soush\050119H.clt
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S.
DIRECTOR C 0 U N T '~
Environmental
2700 'M" Street, Suite 300 Health
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Services
(505)861-3636
(805)861-3429 FAX Department
July l 0, 1995
James Allen Waggoner
WZI, Inc.
P. O. Box 9217
Bakersfield, CA 93389
SUBJECT: Stockpiled Soil Analysis, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
(Permit No. 050119)
Dear Mr. Waggoner:
The laboratory results of the samples retrieved from the soil piles at the Leo Black Estate have.
been reviewed. As discussed, the soil may be used as backfill to the existing excavation at the
site.
Following completion of backfilling activities, implementation of the workplan recently approved
may be initiated.If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at
(805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: Tom Gilbert / Donna Roberts
Wcndy Thompson
~goush\0$0119g.cit
g : 3. 20
~OSI Office Box 92~ 7
Bakersfield, Californ;a 93389
8C5/326-1112 B05,'326-0191 FAX
WZl ,.c
FAX LEAD SHEET
Total Number of Pages,
Date Transmitted:
Fax Number:
Telephone NUmber:
File Number:
CONFIRMING TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (805) 326-1112
WZI INC. FAX NUMBER IS (805) 326-0191
Oper,; Date Sent: ,, Time Sent: ___ Initials: Return Original; Y N Copy Sencler: Y N
her oQd
P,O, ~OX
C O ~ ~ O ~ ~ T i 0IN HILMAR,
1~/~4/95 , ,,., [O~S Oerttfioa~_foq t 14g~
ANALYSIS REPORT~ BTEXlTotal Petro. Hy:r~=arbona as Gasoline
GLIENT~ WZI
PO BOX g217
~a~ersYleld, CA g3385
At~n~ Steve
D~te Reoeived= 1~/a3195
D~e Started, lel~3/g5
Da~ Completed=lg/g4t$$
Sampled BY~ Al. len
~TEX T_pfl-Oasollfle .'
RESULTS~ EPA 6g2 EPA
~glU
Ethv: Total
Benzene,l Toluene, Benzene, X¥1ena
PH51~467 ND<.3 ND<,3 ND<.~ NDe.3 ND~
LB-MW1-1
PH~1~a468 ND<.3 ND<,3 ND<.~ ND<,3 ND<5~
LB-MW2-1
PHSl~46g ND<,3 ND<.3 ND<.:~ ND<.3 ND<$~
LB-MW~-I
PH51~47~ ND<,3 ND<.3 ND<.3 ND<.3
LB-MW4-1
Sher o d
C 0 ~ p. O__R A ? I 0 N HILMAR. CALIFORNIA053~4
ANALYSIS REPORT= To~aI te=overa~le Po:no, Hydroo&rbona
PO BOX 9217
aa erefleld. CA g3369
At~n~ $~eve Muir
O~':~ Sampled; 8gl~7/g5
I
~ D~e Started= 1~/~3/g~
Al Ion Weggener~ Oa:e Completed~1~/B4/95
8ampler~
RESULTS~ TEPH-Di.es~I, Kerese~*. Oielect,rle_a~d Mq~or Ol.le
EPA 351i/eele(M)
PHSlO&487 ND]<5~ All Analyt~s
PH51&e488 N~<Se All Analy:es
L B-MW2-1
PH~l~&469 ND<5~ All Analyt~s
L B-MW3 - 1
PH51~&47~ N~<S& All
LB-MW4-1
Gloria Poi lng .:
Laboratory DirecTor
-- OFF[¢~ (~Og) 667°6;,58 ~, PAX: {20gl 667,258', · BIS; 051 6iS7-4119
:
I'
Sherwodd
P.O. ~OX 937
ANALY~I~ ~EPORT~ BTEX/T~3tal PetPo. Hy~oc~bona ~g Gasoline
CLIENT, WZ! lNG
/
Bakersfield. CA g3389
Attn~ Steve Mul ./~'
Project Name; Leo Bla¢~ Estate Date
Date Reoelvedt ~g121/g~
DaTe Gomple~ed~fg/2$/g5
Sampled By, Allen Waggo.,er .
_Lab Re=o~ #J HS~g2224_
RESUC?;~ EPA 8~2~ EPA 583E/~ISiM)
ug/Kg mgiKg
EthvI Totel
Ben2ene, ?olue~e, Benzene,.Xytene TPH
PH~B~$61 ND*3 ND<a ND*3 ND<~ ND<I
LB-MW3-3
PHS~g258A ND<3 ND<~ ND<~ ND<3 ND<I
La-MW4-3
LB-MW1-GRA5
.PHS~g2584 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<$ ND41
LO-MW2-GRAB
PH5~$2585 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-MW3-ORAB
PH5~O~6O8 NO~3 ND<$ ND<3 ND<3 ND41
~B-M~4-gRAB
O~IOE:(Z~)~7'5;~ · FAX;(2OSJEOT-ES~ , 88S;:(20g) 687-4110
SherwoOd
AHALYSIS 8EPO~T~ To,al ~e~overa~le ~a~ro. Hydrooarbo~s
CLIENT; ~ZI INC
sox ,,
Bakersfield. CA g33e~
A~n~ $~e~e ~u ~ '
D~e Sampled, ~9/19/e5
P~oJect Name; Leo Si;ok ~s;ate D~te Received, ~g/21/95
Da~e Started~ ~9125/9E
8ampler, Alien Waggoner Dste Comple~edt~9/2g/95
............. La~ Renort #= H5~92224
RESUL?8~ TEPH-D esela Ke~oee~_~_.Oleleot~[o and Motor Oils
EPA
mg 'Kg
PHs~g2581 ND:5 All An~l¥~e$
LB-MW3-3
PHS~g2582 ND,r5 Ail AnGlytes
LS-MW4-3
LB-MW1-GRAB
PH5~9~§84 55 Motor 011 Range Org~nl=s
LB-UW2-GRAB 27 Diesel Range O~ganio;=
!
PH$~92585 NDe5 All Analyt==
~6-UW3-GRAB
!
PH~g~586 27 Mo~o~ 011R=nge o~ganJ~e
LB-UW4-GRAB 2~ Diesel Ran~
Glo, la Poling
Labo(~etor'y Dlre=~ar
t BFIAIN OF CU,. I'ODY
,...<mmflmld, CaJilamJa
$ample Type: (cl.~w=k one)
_ Drinking W~tm, r ~ Gu~ace Wate~ _, Wute Water _ 0il
, ,,! . . -..
Date: _. T~, .,
Sample(s) Rellnqu~l'~d by: I .....
I
$arngle($) Received by:
sample(s) Retlnqui~ed l~ I.~
r""p~(.) Received in Lab by:
Sample conditicm When Received ~
N~tm gf
TOTRL P, 84
,', ('~AIN~OF CUSTODY DOCU~ T
~ DSn~ng We~ _., Suff~ Wmee, Wame Water Off ..... ~ ~il
~udge ~ ~er (e~) _
Sample Numar Date Coll~ ~ll~ofe Name . Y~ of An~ _
I
I
~ TQTRL P, ~
l'~ I Bakersfield
4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120
Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
805/326-1112 FAX 805/326-0191
VIA FAX: 805/861-3429 "'.
July 6, 1995
Ms. Dolores Gough
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Leo Black Site
Soil Analyses
Dear Ms. Gough:
The accompanying laboratory analyses .are for samples collected from the on-site soil
piles at the Leo Black site at 3039 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California.
Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G, EPA 5030/8015M)
and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX, EPA 8020) are all below detection
limits. Low levels of petroleum hydrocarbons as motor oil and diesel were indicated by
the analysis for total petroleum hydrocarbons (EPA 3540/8015M). These concentrations
appear to be consistent with minor surface staining by hydrocarbons.
Upon receipt of your written approval, we are prepared to begin the remaining work at
the site by first backfilling the existing excavation with imported soils, followed by the
on-site soils.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or require additional
information.
Very truly yours,
JAW/jkw ~Ja-mes Allen Waggor{er- ~,"~.~ ~
cc: Wendy Thompson
Enclosures
02060010.031
~UN-~?-199S 16: 1R SHERWOOD LRB$, INC. 209667V2SB1 P.~
Sher od
Labs
$071 NO~H ~NOE~ ~UE
P.O. BOX 937
C O R P O R A T I O N HILMAR. CALIFORNIAg~24 '
ANALYSIS REPORT: To~al Recoverable Pe'~ro. Hydrocarbons
CLIENT~ WZl IN.C
.PO 80X 9217
Bakersfield, CA 93389
^ttn= steve Muir
Date Sampled: 06/22/95
Project Namel Leo Black Estate Date Received~ ~6/23/95
Date Started: ~6/26/95
Samplerl Stephen Muir Date Completed=06/27/95
Lab Report #= H50626~6
RESULTS~ TRPH-Diesel~ Kerosene, Ole. lectrlc and Motor Oils
EPA 354018815(M)
mg/Kg
PH5863189 11 Motor OII
": LB-RP1 -NW
PH5;}63190 7 Diesel
LB-RP1 -NE
PHSe63191 39 Diesel
LB-RP1-SIN 10 Motor O! I
· ' PH5863192 5 Motor Oii
LB-RP1 -SE
PH5~63193 17 Motor Oi !
LB-RP2-E
PH5~163194 6 Diesel
~ · LB-RP2-W 8 Motor Oi I
:. Gloria Poi lng
~" ': Laboratory Dlreotor
OFFICE: (209) 867-5258 · FAX: (20cj) 667-2581 · BBS: (209) 687.4119
. JUN-27-lg95 16:1~ SHERWOOD LABS, INC. 209~6772S81 P.02
· .." '. She od
Labs
,, HILMAR, CALIFORNIA 953E4
051g~95 DH$ Certification # 1400
ANALYSIS REPORT~ BTEX/To~&I Pedro. HydPooarbons ~ G~eollne
CLIENT~ WZI INC
PO BOX 9217
B~k®P~fleld, CA 95~89
A~tn~ Steve Mui~
P~oJeot N~me~ Leo Black Estate Date S~mpled~ 06/22/g5
Date Reoeived~ 06/23195
D~te S~Pted~ B6/2g/g5
D~te Complet®d~6127195
S~mpl®d gy~ Stephen ~ul~
Lab RepoPt #~ H5~62606
BTE____~X TpH-Gas'ollne
RESULTS= EPA 8B20 EPA 5~3B/SB15(M)
ug/Kg .' mg/Kg
Ethyl Total
Benzene, Toluene, Benzene, Xylene TPH
PH§~63189 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
, LB-RP1-N~
PH5~63190 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-RP1-NE
PH5~63191 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-RPI-SW
PH5~63192 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-RP1-SE
PH5~63193 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-RP2-E'
PHS~63194 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<3 ND<I
LB-RP2-W
Gloria Poling
OFFICE:(20g)~?-5258 · ~X:(20g) B67-2581 · 8~:(2~)~7-4119
DARLING, MACLIN & THOMSON
CURTIS DARLING TELEPHONE
February 24, 1994
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department !:->' ,i l
.... :.~, r' I;
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: Ms. Dolores Gough
Re: ~~~
Dear Ms. Gough:
This firm represents the Leo Black Estate, which owns the
real property at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California, and with
which you have been dealing regarding its remediation of contamination`
caused by an underground gasoline storage tank.
That remediation is now complete, as shown by the WZI Inc.,
report dated August, 1993, entitled "Leo Black Estate Sum]mary Of
Excavation And Remediation Of Contaminated Soils". Your letters of
September 30, 1993 and January 11, 1993 indicate that the County
believes that monitoring of the groundwater is required.
Your letter of January 11 states that the reason for the groundwater
monitoring is:
"Since there was an unauthorized release of gasoline at
the site and TPH as gasoline was detected in the
groundwater, further investigation of the groundwater is
needed."
I assume from your letter that you have accepted Donna
Roberts' statement that no diesel was ever stored on the site. In
addition, there was clean soil beneath the excavated plume of the
gasoline tank. Therefore any diesel contamination in the groundwater
beneath the Black Estate property is from offsite sources. Further,
the diesel in the samples is an indicator that the contamination,
including the gasoline with which it was found, is not from the Black
Estate release.
The issue, then, is what is the purpose of monitoring the
groundwater for gasoline contamination? The WZI report indicates that:
"all the gasoline contamination caused by the former
underground fuel tank has been removed". (at page 2.)
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department
February 24, 1994
Page 2
The underground gasoline storage tank which leaked had been
empty since 1984. This means that in the last ten years there has been
no further contamination generated from the Estate property to push the
old contamination into the groundwater. Further, even if it could be
shown that any of the Black Estate contamination had reached the
groundwater in the past, it has long since migrated away from the Black
Estate property. ' ...................................................................................................................................
The County has not presented any evidence contrary to WZI's
conclusion that the contamination has been removed from the site. The
law will correctly agree that therefore there is no source of/'
· contamination on the Black Estate property. To imply, without any
basis, that there continues to be a source of contamination located on
the Black Estate property is unsupported. We are puzzled by the
implication, and request an explanation for it. Pending such an
explanation, we can only surmise that the only two reasons to require'
a monitoring program are to detect either offsite or onsite
contamination, and as there is no further, onsite contamination, that
the purpose of the requirement is to detect contamination on the Black
Estate property created by offsite sources.
THERE IS A 25 SQUARE MILE AREA OF CONTAM/NAT/ONAROUND THIS
SITE. Such reasoning is in stark contrast to the conclusion that has
been reached by the Kern County Superior Court. In the case of "People
of The State of CalifQrnia ex rel California Reqional Water Quality
Control Board, Central Valley Region, Plaintiffs v. Sabre Refining,
Inc., sabre Refining, Inc., Chapter 11 Debtor In Possession,
Defendants" Case No. 183100 the Court held that the Defendant there was
not required to complete a depth and areal report of soil and
groundwater contamination as requested by Plaintiff. The reason for
this, among others, was:
"Further, the study and report would not be of
substantial benefit due to the agency's report of a
historical contamination of a larger 25 square mile area
of ground water by numerous persons other than
Defendants."
The Sabre Refining, Inc., site is located less than one mile
from the Black Estate site on Pierce Road, and so is well within the 25
square mile area of contamination found to exist by the court in that
case. A copy of the judgment in that case is attached as Exhibit "A".
Further evidence of the regional contamination is shown on a
map which has been prepared by WZI locating various sources of offsite
contamination near the Black Estate Property. A copy of that map is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference. The
cross-hatched sites show the larger sites where there is known
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department
February 24, 1994
Page 3
contamination, and the penciled-in sites show new sites with dry wells
on the properties. A review of the information available at this time
indicates that there are numerous operators in the one-half mile radius
shown on the map which are actively using dry wells and in other ways
allowing releases of hazardous materials or petroleum. These are very
large or medium, active operators, as opposed to the Black Estate
property which has not been operated for ten years. Dry wells, active
or inactive, whose purpose is disposal of wastes, are a far more
direct, serious conduit of wastes than an underground storage tank
which hadn't been used in ten years. One large site within a mile of
the Black Estate property, the San Joaquin Refinery, may have active
dry wells and leaking pipelines which are still generating
contamination and pushing the existing contamination into the
groundwater.
It is possible that there is a course of conduct in the
region of continuing to pollute while in the process of legal
proceedings and/or negotiations with agencies which delay the
remediation of properties. The Black Estate cannot afford such delays,
and so it has meanwhile gone forward and complied to the letter with
the law and the Health Services Department's requirements. The Black
Estate has, in fact, gone above and beyond the call of duty in that it
has remediated contamination from offsite sources as well as from its
own tank. It is patently unfair that under such circumstances the
little guy who has cleaned up his property in the hope of making
economic use of it should be required to expend time and money to check
on the other property owners' problems, especially when such problems
are still ongoing and, worse yet, still being created! To require the
Black Estate to conduct a monitoring program causes further delay to
the use of the Black Estate property, and requires the Black Estate to
produce funds it does not have to pay for the monitoring program.
Expenditures of such funds would seem more logically required by those
sites still generating contamination or harboring contaminated soils.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO FINGERPRINT THE CONTAMINATION IN THE
GROUNDWATER DUE TO THE REGIONAL CONTAMINATION. Due to the regional
contamination, it is not possible to fingerprint any contamination in
the groundwater below the Black Estate property. The myriad offsite
sources which have contributed and continue to contribute to the
groundwater contamination create a TPH concentration in the groundwater
which is not capable of being linked to any particular site.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS ~RE~LREADY IN PLACE TO MONITOR
TEE REGIONAL CONTAMINATION. The map attached as Exhibit "C" shows the
locations of the many existing groundwater monitoring wells. If these
wells are not sufficient to generate the information the County needs
regarding the contamination which is in the groundwater in the area,
then the County may desire to install additional wells, even on the
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department
February 24, 1994
Page 4
Black Estate property. However, the Black Estate should not bear the
burden of doing so, as that would be for the purpose of monitoring
offsite sources' contamination.
NEITHER GROUNDWATER MONITORING ON ESTATE PROPERTY . NOR
ANYTHING ELSE THE ESTATE CAN DOWILL PREVENT CONTAMINATION FROM OFFSITE
SOURCES FROM ENTERING ESTATE PROPERTY. THEREFORE, IT IS ARBITRARY AND
C~PRICIOUS TO REQUIRE GROUNDWATER MONITORING. The Estate has shown
that the source of gasoline which was released has been removed and all
contaminated soil is being treated to remediate it. Th~co~exeoB~or of
the Estate has presented evidence that there never was~esel sto~%d on
the property, and, as additional evidence, has shown tha~-~eH~O~rator
of the property did not own or use diesel equipment in his operations.
The County has not produced any evidence to the contrary of either of
these facts. . .,..~ ~
In addition, there is ample evidence of cont~inatlon coming
onto the Black Estate property from offsite sources.~ Therefore, the
County's choice of remedy is arbitrary and capricious and not supported
by the record. The offsite sources should be required to install the
monitoring wells, offsite operators should be required to indemnify
other property owners like the Black Estate for the contamination they
are causing when it migrates, and the Estate should not be penalized
due to other properties' contamination. Installing monitoring wells
will not prevent further contamination from offsite sources. Any other
steps which a private party could take to prevent further contamination
by offsite sources would in this case be prohibitively expensive, given
the extent and the unknown mixture of the liability of the offsite
sources.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WOULD BE ANDNDUEHARDSHIP TO THE LEO
BLACK ESTATE. The Leo Black Estate's only asset is the subject real
property which has been remediated. The co-executors of the Estate
will sell the real property as soon as it is marketable. There are no
funds in the Estate to pay for the monitoring. The cost of the
groundwater monitoring program is anticipated to cost $15,000.00 in the
first year, and $2,000.00 per year thereafter. It is impossible, or at
least an undue hardship, for the Estate to finance this monitoring,
especially inasmuch as the purpose and the objective of the monitoring
do not appear to be caused by the Black Estate contamination.
EVEN IF THE UNDERGROUND STOI~AGE TANK FUND REIMBURSES THE
ESTATE; THE MONITORING WOULD BE AN UNNECESSARY BURDEN ON THE STATE
TAXPAYERS. Although it is possible that the State Underground Storage
Tank Fund may reimburse the Estate for the costs of the monitoring,
this result is not certain, and further, it is no less irrational to
monitor the groundwater in either case. And even if the State
Underground Storage Tank Fund will reimburse the Estate, the necessary
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department
February 24, 1994
Page §
funds must be available to the Estate to pay contractors during the
time the State Underground Storage Tank Fund takes to reimburse, and
they are not.
AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN WOULD ALLOW THE STATE TO MONITOR THE
GROUNDWATER AND CLOSE THE CASE. Based on the record, there is no
reason for the Black Estate to be required to monitor the groundwater
as it bears no rational relationship to the facts. The Black Estate
remediation should be considered complete and a closure letter issued.
The groundwater monitoring program would not be able to identify the
source of the groundwater contamination as being from the Black Estate
property--the TPH found already indicates that is the case. If the
County needs a groundwater monitoring well on the Black Estate, it may
be possible to arrange for a site to be used for that purpose, but not
at the Estate's expense, and it should be in conjunction with a closure
letter. The remediation has been completed. As was held in the sabre
Refining, I~c, case discussed above, there would be no substantial
benefit to requiring the monitoring wells, and there would be no harm
to the public interest in not requiring them.
The co-executors of the Leo Black Estate have gone to great
lengths to Comply with the law and to work with the County to achieve
the end of remediating this property, and they stand ready and willing
to do whatever is reasonable. However, the co-executors of the Estate,
well aware of their fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries, cannot go
forward with a plan which is based on assumptions and conclusions which
are not supported by the facts. We would be happy to discuss this
further at any time.
Ver~ruly yours,
Winif~d Thomso~
WT:ls
~A~ Or~CC$ O~
Ir' E~£AU, THELr'N, [..AHPE &.MCINTO.S,H
Defendants, -. - .-
SABRE REFINING, INC. AND
SABRE REFINING, INC. DEBTOR-IN-
POSSESSION
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
11
12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
ex rel CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
13 QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL ) NOTICE OF ENTRY O?
.VALLEY REGION ) JUDGMENT
14 Plaintiffs, )
)
15 v. )
)
16 SABRE REFINING, INC., SABRE )
REFINING, INC., CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR )
17 IN POSSESSION )
)
18 Defendant. )
)
20 To the People of the State of California ex re!
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley
21
22 Region, plaintiffs, and to the California Attorney General,
23 plaintiffs' attorney of record:
24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on September 28, 1989,
25 judgment was entered in the above-entitled action in favor of
26 the defendant Sabre Refining, inc., and against the plaintiff,
27 People of the State of California ex rel California Regional
2s ////
//// EXHIBIT "A'
1
Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, a copy of
which is attached to this notice.
DATED: October 9, 1989 LeBEAU, THELEN, LAMPE, McINTOSH &
4 CREAR
5 By
DAVID R.. b/U4P£, Attorney for
6 Defendant Sabre ~e[[ning,.
Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
~ . 12
E o
~8
20
21
22
24
2~
27
PROOF 0~' SERVICE BY MAIL (1013a. 2015.5 C.C.P.)
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
3 ) ss.
COUNTY OF KERN )
4
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
5
the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years a~d
6
not a party to. the within action; my business address is:
'7
5531 Business Park South, Suite 210, Bakersfield, California
8
93309. On October 10, 1989 , I served the within NOTICE Of'
9
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT on the parties in said action, by placing a
10
true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage
thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Bakersfield,
12
California addressed as follows:
~ohn K. Van De
-14 Attorney General of the
State of California
Deputy Attorney General
18 3580 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
!8
19
2O
21
22
23
24 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
25 is true and correct.
2S Executed on October 10 , 1989, at Bakersfield,
27 California.
28
THERESA M. SHERRILL
LA~ OffiCES Or
LE BEAU, THELEN. LA~PE & HCINTOSH
2 S~31 BUSINESS P~ SOUTM
,, ~,.-- .
TELEPHONE IBOS! 3ZS'BD6Z ~ ~' ' ~ ~ .L-~,
5 A**O.~C~s to, Defendants,
SABRE REFINING, INC. AND
6 SABRE REFINING, INC. DEBTOR-IN-
POSSESSION
7
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I0 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
11
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
12 ex rel CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL ) JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL
13 VALLEY REGION ) BY SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs, )
~4 )
v. )
15 )
SABRE REFINING, INC., SABRE )
16 REFINING, INC., CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR )
IN POSSESSION )
17 )
Defendant. )
18 ")
19
This cause came on for regula=ly for trial on April 3,
20
lg89 in Department 8 of' the above-entitle8 court, the ~onorable
21
Lewis E. King, Juage, presiding, sitting without a jury, a jury
~2
having been duly waived. Plaintiff appearefl by its attorney,
23
E8war8 J. Dubiel, Esq., Deputy A~torney General. DefenSant
24
appeared by its attorney~ David R. Lampe, Esq., LeBEAU, TEELEN,
25
LAMPE, McINTOSH & CR~. Evi8ence, both oral an~ aocumentary,
26
having been presented by both parties, the cause having been
27
argue~ and submitted for 8ecision, and a statement of 8ecision
28
not having been requestefl,
1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
2 plaintiff take nothing by way of its complaint and that
3 defendant have judgment on all causes of action of plaintiff's
4 complaint, and that defendant be and hereby is awarded its costs
5 of suit.
' '~UDGE OF THE SUPERIOR~.QOURT
8
10
11
12
5~o~.~4 ..
15
18
20
21
22
2~
2~
25
2~
27
~28
· · · SUPE~clOR COURT ')F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
August 28, 1989 4;00 P.H. 8
DATE, COUR! MET AT DEPAI~TkAENT NO.,
LEWIS E. KING D.M. Ritchie
pRF$1~NT, HON, o JUDGE 0 DEPUTY CLERK
NO N0
,. REPORIER BAILIFF
TiTLEs ¢OUHSR.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIF. Edward Dubiel, Deputy Attorney
General " .'
¥S
SABRE REFINING', INC., et al David Lampe
H.A.TU~E OF r~'OcEEDING$.. ACTION NO. 1 F~ ~ 1 ~'1 ~1
COURT DECISION
See Decision attached.
A COPY OF THIS. M.O. WAS SENT TO COUNSEL THiS DATS~2 DR
~I~tlT~C
1
2
3
4
5
6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7 iN ARD ~OR THE CO0'lfl~ OF
~.~~
9
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
10 ex tel, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL )
11 VALLEY REGION, )
12 Plaintiffs, )
)
13 vs. )
)
14 SABRE REFINING, INC., SABRE, )
P~EFINING, INC., CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR ) DECISION
15 IN POSSESSION, )
)
16 Defendants. )
)
18 The Plaintiff, Attorney General for the Regional Wafer
19 Control Board, filed a four count complaint for ~njunctions
20 and civil penalties on June 21, 1983, under Division 7 of the
21 Water qode.
22 The action is based on the alleged violation of a cease
23 and desist order issue~.by the Water Control Board against the
2Z Defendants on December 5, 1980.
25 The Defendants went into Bankruptcy on ~eptember 28,
26 1982. .'
The Court finds that the Defendants stopped business
2
operations in 1981 and the waste water sump in issue has n
3
been used since 1981.
4
The Oourt grants judgment for the Defendants as' the
Gease and Desist Order has been moot since 1981.
and Desis~ Order 78-24 and requests an order of the Gourt
81 compelling c. ompliance by the Defendants.
9 The Court orders judgment for the Defendants. In
10 addition to the finding of mootness, the Court:~ is not
11 convinced that Plain,tiff has proved Defendants made any
12 discharge of prohibited materials into the wate~-s of the State
13 since the date of the Gease and Desist Order,
14 The Court denies the request for a depth and areal
15 report of soil and gro%%nd water contamination
18 Plaintiff.
17 The Oourt has considered the evidence presented to the
18 Regional Water Gontrol Board and the evidence presented at the
19 hearing in this Court. The Court fs required to exert:se its
20 independent judgment under C, hapter 7 of the Water
21 The order for the depth and' areal soil and water study
22 issued by the Water Board was in violation of the Defendant's
23 due process rights in .that there was not proper notice of this
24 issue, and .this. type of order is properly the subject matter
25 of an abatement and clean-up hearing and order.
2~ The Court further finds that it is impossible for
1 Defendants to comply with the soil and water study because of
2 its cost of over $~50,O00 and the fact that Defendants do no~
3 have funds to pay for such a study.
4 If not imposs~ble, the Court finds that ]t would be
5 undue hardship on the Defendants.
6 Further, the study and report would not...be o.f.
7 substantial benefit due to the agency's report of a historical
8 contamination of a larger 25 square mile area of 9round water
9 by .numerous persons other than Defendants.
10 The Court further finds that there would be nc.harm to
11 the public interest in not requiring the report.
12 Counts 2 and S of the C~mplaint allege violations of
13 the Cease and Desist Order and requests the Court to order
14 monetary penalties against the Defendants.
'15 The Oourt grants judgment fgr the Defendants on Counts
16 2 and 8.
17 In'addition to mootness, there is insufficient proof of
18: any violation, any number of days of violation, and it
19 impossible to determine with specificity the amount of
20 penalties.
21 Also, because Defendants are out' of business, the Court
22 would decline to impose any monetary penalties.
2~ Count 4 of the Complaint seeks ~o enjoin a public
nuisance.
The Court gives judgment to the Defendants.
26 The Plaintiff has fai~ed to prove a public nuisance
3
1 exists.
2 The Defendants complied with ~he Regional Water Control
3 Board requirements for years. When the Water Board found i~
4 necessary to change the requirements for the who]e.Fruttva]e
5 Field, the Defendants found that they could not comply with
6 ~he new requirements, ceased the operation, went out of
? business~ removed waste water pipes, emptied the sealed sump
8 and wen~ into the Bankruptcy Court.
9 DATED: August 24, 1989.
13
14
15
16
17
2O
22
23
24
25
2~ I
4
I
Bess A
.~Meddian Ave. Turcon Ac~r/oL UN~O~
~ ~URED I~S~RT
~ ~8 GIB~N RD. ~P~R~
iI.
I O ~L~ ~ ~PER O[ T~L
3747 G~ORE AV~ ~ ~ G~LMORE A~, ~7 ~ AV~
2~ ST~DA~ ST.
P~R~M ~L~
~ GIB~N
/
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
0 Fee t 2000' LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
3090 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA.
J', , ~
OFFSlTE SOUROES OF KNOWN AND
0 Miles ~mi.
SUSPEOTED GROUND WATER
0 K il oma ter $ .50k m ., CONTAMINATION
1, · ' '' 'I D^T~ 2/94 I o2oe.oo'o^l~H'B'T
I I
EXHIBIT "B"
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
3090 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA.
Bass Ave. J ·
~ DA~ES
~ ~ GU~ ST.
L~A~ON OF
di~ Ave. Tu~on A ~. UN~
East Dr.
/
LEGEND
· APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL
Feet 2000' I~ wz, ,.c.
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~,
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
M il e s ~ m i. ~O,O.,E.CE.OA~,.~gE"~F'"'D,C~
Kilometers .50km e.OUND WA*ER UoNrrOR~.~
WELL LOCATION MAP
" I DATE
2/94 I O20e.00,OA J EXHIBIT
l::X 31T "G"
DARLING, MACLIN & THOMSON
SUITE ~S0 BANK OF AMERICA BUILDINO
BRUCE MACLIN (80S) 32B-5OTB '
WtNIFREO THOMSON 1430 TRUXTUN AVENUE
July
8,
1993
John H. Sears, Esq.
Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon
505 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94111-2514
Re: Read Investments - Leo Black
Temporary License Agreement
Dear John:
In response to your last letter, transmitted with the final
Temporary License Agreement, I have discussed your request for a
deed of trust with the co-executors and.my partner, who is the
attorney in charge of the probate, and they have indicated that in
order for the co-executors to give a deed of trust a court order
from the Probate Court would be required. Obtaining such a court
order would take an inordinate, amount of time, and would be
prohibitive under the current time-frame imposed upon the Estate by
the State Water Resources Control Board and the terms of the
Temporary License Agreement.
In addition, the co-executor who has been managing the cleanup
problem.told me that his understanding is that the State will pay
100% of the costs of the cleanup, less $10,000.00, which the Estate
has already paid out of its own funds, and subject to the
availability of funds in the State Underground Storage Tank Cleanup
Fund. He has recently moved his residence and business, and is
unable to place his hands on the initial letter of commitment,
however, enclosed is a copy of a letter from the State Water
Resources Control Board dated May 27, 1993, which is a general
update to the underground storage tank owners, in which it is
indicated that the Fund has ample monies at this time. In
addition, I called the State Water Resources Control Board to
confirm the availability of funds in excess of the $24,000.00
committed in the letter previously forwarded to you. I spoke with
Barbara Andrews at 916-227-4417, who confirmed that additional
funds would be automatically reimbursed, and the letters in my file
indicate that Susan Phillips at 916T227-4366 is the first person to
contact there, although she was out at the time that I called.
John H. Sears, Esq.
July 8, 1993
Page Two
Finally, the co-executors are of the opinion that if the
contamination from the Leo Black Estate property does encroach upon
the Read Investments property, it is in a very minor amount, and
that the deed of trust is unwarranted. The staff person at the
lead agency, the Kern County Environmental Health Services
Department, Dolores Gough, is of the same opinion.
I would hope that the additional information about the
availability of the State funds, of which I was unaware when I
wrote to you previously, would give your client the level of
comfort it requires under the circumstances, and as soon as I hear
from you, I will have the Temporary License Agreement executed and
forwarded to you, together with the insurance certificate and the
contractor's information. I hope to hear from you soon.
Very truly yours,
WT/sld
Enclosure
cc: Donna Roberts
Tom Gilbert
Dolores Gough
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Dept.
STATE WA~ R~OU~S CONSOL BOARD
~t4 T B~Y. 9~TE
P.O. ~X ~212
(916) 227-4530 (F~)
May 27, 1993
TO: Claimants '
Regulator~Agencies
In,erected Parties
~UBJECT: I;NDE~GRO~D 8TO~TANKCLEANUP FUND (FT. FRD) UPDATE
INTRO~UCTXON
Our February 1, 1993 ul~late on the Fund received a number of
favorable comments. Much has happened since that time and
wanted to keep everyone advised of the Fund's progress.
Many tank owners may have reuently received a mailer wh/ch
expressed concerns re~arding the solvency of the Fund. Some of
the statements included in the mailer were: (1) "the majority of
you will not receive ohs dime from the Under,round Storage Tank
Cleanup Fund.; (2) "the fund will dry up long before most of you
receive anything"; ahd (3) "as many as 78% of you may not be
reimbursed".
Since this mailer was published, we received a number of letters
and calls to the Fund from concerned claimants. The followin~
.are the facts regarding the solvency of the Fund~
a. The Fund began collecting the storage fee on January 1, 1991.
Under current law, the gee collection will stop on January 1,
1998. TO dste, about $20 milli0nper calendar quarter or about
$80 million per year ~s being collected. Therefore, based on the
experience to
collect about
b. It wa8 always recognized that the initial fee structure of
$0.006 per gallon would not be capable of handling all ~otentia!
claims. For this reason, the legislation provided a priority
system which theoreuically helps those who need the assistance
~he most.
c. Anyone faudliar with the program also knows that the
legislation im~lementingthe Fund was only a "fcc= in the door"
and that once the Fund was up and running, and the needs of the
progra~ better identified, leg£sla~ion might be sought
jL~_-k~-'_~5 113~ IL':~D IL):PEN-.'LIL PR0gt~lb ~.c~. ILL I.~l: aq','~
increas= the fee andil,~xtend the life oi ~.~he p~gram. .Because. '~".'~
program is s~ill in ~ early stages off ~lementa~ton, ~ "'. '.;'~'~.'.'. '
decided no~ to Stek ~ increase of the ~e during this 1993~94','.
le~i~la~i~ se~sion.~,[ The pr~ram ~ay se~k l~islati0n in ~he~:''.
next l~gi~lativ= 'sesSion w~ch would inore~s~ th~ fee, .e~end ~he"~-.[
life of the program, ;~s well as 0~her needed changesl'
.~
d. At Ch~ early at, ,e, it is ve~ dif,,~l?,o eeti,te what
the average claim wii cost. ~ar e~er,ence to ~e is that
clai~nts tend to or( esti~te eligibl~ costs on the .
applications.. In fa( , there are a nu~r o~ claimers who ha~
es~imated the m~im~ cost of SIM even ~hough they have not
star, ed ~rk. The i~ I Litters oi Commitments issued as of May
28, 1993 committed a ~otal of $26.5 milk,on or a~ut $66,000 per
claim. However, for .~nsy m~agement ~ses, we' conelder the
400 Le~ers of Co~it~nt =o be a ~tent~al .obligation
~nd of $60.0 millio~ior ~ut $150,000 per claim. .
In summa~, I believeJ[that ~sed on the 'e~erienge to .date~ .t~
will be f~ding for all pri0ri6y "A" ~" "B" ~laims. ~'~d~g
u~n the nu~er of future priority "A" a~ "B" claim~" s~iDted.
and depending upon tH~ average cost per ]i~lai~, I ~'lieve
~er the current pr~ram ~ng, ther~ will ~ f~ding for
most of the priority ~'C" clai~. It i~ ~ot likely t~%'~n~,
any, of t~ priority }'D" clai~ can be ~nded ~der the'
fee stutters. However, as previously ~ntioned, the pr~am.-
will seek additional .~ding aC ~he app~pria~e time.
We con=inue ~o ge= ~s~lo~ ~ut whether the ~ney In the'
is protected fr~ be~s used for other ~ose,. ~188' (Hauser)
was signed by the ~rnor on Septe~,r :~0, 1992. T~8 bill ".'
placed the Fund in t~ State Treas~ r~her ~an the ~neral '"
~d. T~e insures ~ha~ ~y f~ ~r~ed fr~ =he accost"
other state nee~ mu~t. be paid ~ck. AI~.. funds previously ':'. . :'.
borrowed ha~e ~en repaid with interest.. All clai~ $~itted
for paint have been~paid with ~eolute~y no delay.
As of May 28, 1993, sg:.af~ ~d c~leted ~etailed ver~fication
reviews of the claims wl~h the r~lato~ agencies on 5~3
~d issued 400 Letters. o~ ~t~nt.
~e face value of these 400'~ttere o~ ~t~nt add U~'
$26.5 million. However, these 400 clal~ ~ve ~ eetl~ted $60'.0
million obligation om.the ~a since we ~ue= res~e f~dS .~
~hese claims through Completion of cleanup. .We: have p~ceee&d
163 pa~ents and paid:,ou=.:, a total of $6.~0.... ~lllon. . ' ."
they must pay taxes o~. fund~ received. ~e answer i~ tha~ "i~ ·
d~pends" and you shoul..d check with your ~'ax specialist. ' '
I can tell you tha~ there will ~ Fo~s 1~99 issued on all
pa~ents made and that. the In~e~al Revenhe Service has already
e~ressed an ink,rest in the pa~=ents ~ng made.
There are several bills that have been introduced in this
legislative session.
SB108 - Would require the development o~ a priority list at
least annually instead of at least twice annually.
Would allocate ~ 15% of the total annual
appropriation o~ the Fund to fund
claims and ~ 15% of the total annual
appropriation of the Fund to fund Priority Class 'D'
claims.
A~1061 - Would ~ove local agencies (cities, counties,
districts) up to either Priority "B" or Priority
"C." To qualify as a Priority ~B~, the local agency
would have to have total annual revenues of less
than $7M. To qualify as a Priority ~C", local
agencies would have to have less than ~00 employees.
AB131 - Would move the ~oint o~ collection o~ the 6 mill
storage fee from ~he tank owner to the petroleum
distributor.
since publics=ion of our last up,ate, ~everal excellent
mug~estions have been pro~osed ~or future issues o~ this update.
One of these was the addition of a ~Dear'Dave· column which would
address ~uest~one o~ general interest raise~ by claimants and
other interes~ed part,es. ~£ you have any questions of general
intere~t, please write to me.
Another suggestion was to develop a standardi~ed Bid/Bill FOrm
which would serve two purposes: (1) stan~ardize the bid process;
arid (2) standardize the bills that are eu~itte~ for payment
the Fund.
Lastly, several commentors su~eeted that we~ublish a list
acceptable cost ranges ~or contractors, laborator~ analyses and
~on~ultants. Several states currently have ~uch lists. We are
currently in the process o~ collec~ing an~ tabulating such costs.
The Env£ronmental Protection A~ency is also in the process of
developing such
Sincerely,
D~ve~. Deaner, Manager
Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Program
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 83301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
April 10, 1995
Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert & Donna Roberts
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Assessment and Interim Remedial Action Workplan for
Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
· Dear Mr. Gilbert & Ms. Roberts:
The subject workplan prepared by WZI Inc. has been reviewed. The proposed tasks including '
the methods of implementation are acceptable to this Department.
In regard to the stockpiled soil, sampling should be conducted before interim remedial action is
initiated to determine if any volatile organics remain in the soil. We recommend retrieving a
minimum of three samples composited to one for every 50 cubic yards.
The field work for this phase of the investigation must be initiated within 60 days from the date
of this letter. Please notify this office at least 48 hours ~prior to beginning any sampling and/or
drilling activities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805)
861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: WZI Inc.
Central Valley RWQCB
goush\050119f, clt
ENVIRONM , TAL HEALTH SERVI $ DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~ Bakerefield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
February 9, 1995
Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert & Donna Roberts
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Storage Tank Investigation, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Sir/Madam:
A review of the subject facility file indicates that site closure was denied last year because of the
contamination found in groundwater. Further investigation, which may involve groundwater
monitoring initially was required. To our knowledge this work has not been initiated to date.
In order to facilitate site closure and keep the facility in compliance with the state's and our
corrective action requirements, the additional groundwater assessment work must be initiated as
soon as possible. Prior to beginning field activities, a workplan must be submitted for our
approval within 30 days from the date of this letter.
As previously discussed, the excavated soil may be utilized as backfill if confmnatory sampling
shows that remediation has been"successful.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact us at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: WZI
CVRWQCB - Fresno
~gough\050119e.¢lt
ENVIRONME, Ji AL HEALTH:. SERVId' DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 881-3429 FAX
March 11, 1994
Central Valley RWQCB
3614 E. Ashlan
Fresno, California 93?26
ATTN: Kevin Long
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Investigati'on, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,~
Bakersfield, CA
Gentlemen:
As per our telephone conversation, Environmental Health is requesting the Regional Water
Quality Control Board's comments on the subject ~vesfigation. F. nclosed are copies of
reports and correspondence relating to the case for your review.
In February 1987, a 500-gallon underground storage tank was removed from the Leo Black
Estate. Laboratory re.suits of soil ssmples retrieved beneath the tank indicated the presence
of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. These results prompted a site characterization
study which subsequently led to the excavation, of impacted so/l;
During excavation, a grab sample of groundwater was retrieved. Petr°lenm hydrocarbons
quant/fled as gasoline and diesel were found in the sample. Based on the results, we have
determined that further groundwater investigation is needed. Representatives of the estate
are not in agreement with our decision. Accordingly, we are requesting that the case be also
reviewed by the Board.
Please note that the court judgement for the Califom/a. Regional Water Quality Control
Board v. Sabre Reining, Inc., case in Kern County had been referenced for this site in the
past. Information regarding this matter is also enclosed.
We appreciate your assistance in this investigation, and if you need additional information,
please call me at (805) 861-3656.
Steve McCalley, Director
By:. Dolores Ooush"
Hazardous Materials Specialist H
H-*nrdous M~terials Management Program
DCa. ch
~nclosu~
ENVI c'? AL PROTECTION AGENCY
STA'rE OF CALIFORNIA - CA~.IFORNIA 7' AL PROTECTION AGENCY ~ PETE WILSON, eovemor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
2014 T STREET, SUITE 130 (~..~
P.O. BOX 944212
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94244-2120 / '.
(916} 227-4307 3 ~ ..
(916} 227-4530 (FAX)
Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert & Donna Roberts
P. O. BOX 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND PROGRAM, REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST, CLAIM NUMBER
004076
We have reviewed and processed your Reimbursement Request No. 1 dated August 18, 1993 for the subject claim
and you will be receiving your funds shortly. Based on this review, we have determined $20,043.00 to be
reimbursable as shown on the att~c,~hed Reimbursement Request Form. Total approved for payment to date is
$20,043.
Since the Letter of Commitment was for only $24,000 as shown on the attached Reimbursement Request I~orm,
an amendment was processed (see attached). Please use the new forms for future requests.
In order to assist you in determining how the eligible and ineligible costs were computed, we are attaching a copy
of our calculations [Technical Review Summary). If you have any questions regarding the ineligible costs, please
contact Patrick Wheeler at (916) 227-227-0743. All costs which require additional information must be re-
submitted with your next Reimbursement Request.
The ineligible costs must be deleted from your next Reimbursement Request, unless you request a Final Staff
Decision within thirty [30) calendar days from the date of this letter.
When submitting Reimbursement Request//2, please enclose copies of cancelled checks for WZI invoice in the
amount of $235.25, check//346.
Please Note: Future "Reimbursement Requests" must show the cumulative total (total-to-date} of all costs incurred
[bring balance forward} as discussed on pages 5 and 6 of the Instruction Booklet.
If you have any questions regarding reimbursement funds or need additional Reimbursement Requests or
SpreadsheetS, please call Barbara Andersen at (916} 227-4417.
Sincerely, : .......
..;_ Barbara Andersen
UST Cleanup Fund Program
cc: Kern County EHD
2700 M Street, Ste. 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
ATrN: Joe Canas
costs
C~M NO: 004076 ~D~ NO: 1
C~~T: ~0 BLACK EST~E B~CE FO~: $24,000
CO-P~EE: NONE
THIS ~O~T: $60,000
C~~ ~D~SS: P. 0. · BOX 121
WOFFO~ HTS., CA 93285 N~ B~.~CE: $84,000
TAX ID / SSA NO.: 95-6792747
Subject to availability of funds, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) agrees to reimburse Leo Black Estate
(Claimant) for eligible corrective action costs at 3090 Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, CA 93309 (Site). The commitment reflected by
this Letter is subject to all of the following terms and conditions:
1. Reimbursement shall not exceed $84,000 unless this amount is subsequently modified in writing by an amended Letter
of Commitment.
2. The obligation to pay any sum under this Letter of Commitment is contingent upon availability of funds. In the event
that sufficient funds are not available for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the State Board, the State Board
shall not be obligated to make any disbursements hereunder. If any disbursements otherwise due under this Letter of
Commitment are deferred because of unavailability of funds, such disbursements will promptly be made when sufficient
funds do become available. Nothing herein shall be construed to provide the Claimant with a right of priority for.
disbursement over any other claimant who has a similar Letter of Commitment ......
3. Unless modified in writing by the State Board, this Letter of Commitment covers work through Phase III of corrective
action work.
4. All costs for which reimbursement is sought must be eligible for reimbursement and the Claimant must be the person
entitled to reimbursement thereof.
5. Claimant must at all times be in compliance with all applicable state laws, rules and regulations and with all terms,
conditions, and commitments contained in the Claimant's Application and any supporting documents or in any payment
requests submitted by the Claimant.
6. No disbursement uno'er this Letter of Commitment will be made except upon receipt of acceptable Standard Form
Payment Requests duly executed by or on behalf of the Claimant.' All Payment Requests must be executed by the
Claimant or a duly authorized representative who has been approved by the Division of Clean Water Programs.
7. Any and all disbursements payable under this Letter of Commitment may be withheld if the Claimant is not in
compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 5 above.
8. Neither this Lette~ of Commitment nor any right thereunder is ~ssignable by the Claimant without the written consent of
the State Board. In the event of any such assignment, the rights of the assignee shall be subject to all terms and
conditions set forth in this Letter of Commitment and the State Board's consent.
9. This Letter of Commitment may be withdrawn at any time by the State Board if completion of corrective action is not
performed with reasonable diligence.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Letter of Commitment has been issued by the State Board this 6th day of December, 1993.
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD JSTATE USE :
BY r
(/~a,ge. Un(,~r~ S~t~rage I~ank Cleanup Fund Program Iss° ' 5'9'°2 ' ~°53°
C~/Divisio~"~dm~i~tr~t~e ~;ervices
REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND
CLAIM NO. 004076 REGION: $ REIMBURSEMENT NO. 1
CLAIMANT: LEO BLA CK ESTA TE
CO-PA YEE: none.
CLAIMANTADDRESS: P.O. BOX121
WOFFORD HEIGHTS, CA 9.3285
CONTAMINA TED SITE:
ADDRESS: 3090 PIERCE RD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
LETTER OF COMMITMENTAMOUNT: $24,000 'AMENDMENT': 0
CORREC17VE
ACTION
COSTS
· TI-IIRD PARTY JUDGMENT 0
CdR TIFICA TION :
[ have read and agree with the "Conditions °[Payment". (F~xMbit I), listed on the reverse side'
o[ this document. NOTE: T~is request CANNOTBE PROCESSED unles~ the "Conditions o[Paymenf' are
included on the reverse side when submitted. ~..
Tile cost~ claimed ~ave been incurred and have been paid or will be paid v~thin thirty (30) days
o[receipt o[ the [~nds requested hereby, l[such costs have not been paid vfftfiin $0 days, [unds received
under this request ~ be returned to the State Water Resources Control Board.
C~AtUA~r StS~A TUNE: .~ ~ ~ 22~*¢ va m ~- /~-,~ x
Form USTCF- REO
ENVIRONMEAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
January 11, 1994
Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Avenue
Oildale, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Remediation, Leo Black Estate,
Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Ms. Roberts:
This Department is in receipt of your letter regarding the use and past chemical storage
at the subject site and adjacent properties. After review and consideration of. all
information submitted to date, and discussions with the Central Valley Regional Water
Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB), the Department still cannot close the case at this
time. Since there was an unauthorized release of gasoline at the site and TPH as gasoline
was detected in the groundwater, further investigation of the groundwater is needed.
The additional investigation work may commence with the installation of groundwater wells
to monitor the water on a quarterly basis. The monitoring results will be evaluated after
a year to determine the next course of action. If contamination other than gasoline
remains in the water, we recommend that further investigation be conducted to determine
possible sources.
If you and/or your contractor has an alternate method to address this problem, please
inform this office in writing. Otherwise, a plan for the additional work needs to be
submitted within 60 days from the date of this letter. If you have any queshons regarding
this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials SpeCialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: Tom Gilbert
WZI, Inc.
Central Valley RWQCB - Fresno
gough\050119d.clt
ENVlRONI ,,"- i'AL EALTH SERv L DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~~ 2700 "M" Street, suite 300
DIRECTOR ~~!I Bakersfield, CA 93301
, (805) 861-3636
"~~ (805) 861-3429 FAX
September 30, 1993
Tom Gilbert
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Remediation, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, CA (Permit No. 050119)
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The August 1993 soil remediation report prepared by WZI Inc. for the subject site has
been reviewed. The report results indicate that all gasoline-contaminated soil to an
approximate depth of 45 feet has been removed. The groundwater grab sample results,
however, showed the presence of significant levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons.
quantified as gasoline and diesel.
Based on our review, the Department does not require any additional excavation at the
site. We concur with WZI's recommendation to remediate the contaminated soil presently
stored on site by aeration. Upon successful completion of remediation, the soil may be
utilized as backfill for the remaining excavation.
As to your request to discontinue groundwater monitoring, the Department does not concur
with. the explanation provided to support the proposed action. Supporting documentation
needs to be provided to prove that only gasoline was stored on site. Although other
sources of hydrocarbon contamination have been identified in the area, there is sufficient
evidence to suggest that Leo Black Estate also has contributed to this contamination as
shown in the work reports to date. To this end, we require that gasoline contamination
in the groundwater at this site be investigated further.
Please submit your plan to address' this matter within 60 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: WZI Inc.
Winifred Thomson
Donna Roberts
Read Investments, c/o John Sears
Central Valley RWQCB gough~gilbert.le~
:, , ~-$ember 29, 1993
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, Ca. 93301
Re: Leo Black Estate ~ Pierce Road Cleanup
Dear Dolores Gough,
I am writing this letter as a follow up of our conversation
last week. I strongly disagreed with a statement in your letter
dated September 30, 1993 and that ground water monitoring continue:
The statement being" suf~£icient~evi, dence,-to:~,suggest~t.h~
Leo. B 1 a ck,~, Est ate ~a.1 s~ ,h a s.~ con-t r i~but ~d'~t o~:~ t.h is .~cen t ami'n ~t~i'on ~':
On my own, I have kept a mother'~'s watchful eye on th~s property
since the death of my mother in 1~65. I' have had a large numDe~, of my
family working on and from this property over the past 40 years., To my knowledge there
h_-_~s never been any material stored on the site in questi,'on~ except the underground
gasoline tank that vms removed..
Lately, I have made numerous 'calls to long' time customers' and neighSors of
the Leo Black Electric to verify what I k~ow to be true: Leo Black .has never
owned or operated equilwnent or vehicles that used '_"di~%~,l.
yard for many years. On the south was a trucking yarc~: westva refinery, east~-diesel
and all around the Leo Black site: .
~.~ calls were numerous and I got the same answer~ '~'" no~ LeQ: Black. never had
diesel on his property',~.
I spoke to Mr, A1 Narchetti, Electropower., Gilmore St: This shop leased half
of the site for many years and have done business .with Leo Black. since the 50~s..
I spoke to Olliver Sturgeon of Sturgeon and Son Construction~ he agreed, no diesel~
I spoke to a gentlem~u who purchased many .pieces of the older vehicles and
equipment from Leo Black. Several trucks~ a fork lift and'.van: He~ Gerald Smith
Construction and Poles~ stated that all of these were and are gasoline driven. He
has done business with Leo Black since the early 60"s and never knew Leo to use
anything except gasoline;
The Leo Black Electric, Inc. now in operation on James Road, bought the
electrical business and equipment from the estate in 1984 and stated nothing they
purchased was diesel driven,
I need to know what "supporting documentation" I can ','provide to prove that
only gasoline was stored on the site".
I have found .only gasoline sa~es in the records,
Mr. Gilbert and I, as co.-executors of the Leo Black Estate, have done everything
requested and req~[[red to clean up this n~tter to your approval._
We are anxious to complete this cleanup without much more delay..
Thank you for your help. It is greatly appreciated~
S' cerely~
' Donn~Robe~ts., co~-execut0~ of the Leo Black Estate
1004 Lorene Ave. '
Oildale, Ca. 93308 (.805) 399~,6966
Environmental Health Services Department
RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McC^LLEY. REHS. DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR Air Pollution Control District
DAVID PRICE Iil VaLUAM J. RODDY, APCO
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Development Semites Department
TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
October 24, 1990
Thomas Gilbert
2000 Julian Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Subject: Location: 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
Permit ~: 050119
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
This letter is to confirm our October 11, 1990, telephone conversation
regarding the delay in the implementation of the remediation workplan at the
subject site. Until such time as this project is initiated, please inform us on
the status on a bi-weekly basis.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at {805) 861-
3636 extension 545.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
\050119.ltr
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636
FAX: (805) 861-3429
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DIRECTOR Bakersfield. CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805} 861-3429 FAX
Suly 19, 1993
$ohn Sears
Bronson & Bronson & McKinnon
505 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-2514
SUBJECT: Underground Storage Tank Site Remediation, Leo Black Estate,
3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Sears:
The presence of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination from an underground storage tank has been
identified at the Leo Black Estate which is located adjacent to a vacant parcel currently owned by.
Read Investments. To remediate contamination that may have migrated beyond the boundary of the
Leo Black estate, access upon the Read parcel is necessary.
Due to the location of'these properties, it is in the best interest of public health and welfare, and all
parties concerned, to expedite remediation. In addition, further delays would allow continued
migration of contaminants.
It is our understanding that approval of an access agreement which was requested by representatives
of the Leo Black Estate has not been finalized. This Department requests your cooperation in the
timely resolution of this matter. Should the remediation of the Leo Black Estate be delayed further
by your failure to grant access, the existing contamination at the Read Investments' site could result '
in your having to implement mitigation activities at a future date,
If you have any questions or need more information regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805)
861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
bowl.,
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: Winifred Thomson
Tom Gilbert
Donna Roberts
Central Valley RWQCB
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. /~~'~I 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~~~ (805)Baker"field'861-3636CA 93301
(805) 861-3429 FAX
July 19, 1993
Tom Gilbert
P. O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Remediation, Leo Black Estate, 3909 Pierce
Road, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
As per telephone conversation with Ms. Winifred Thomson, attorney for the estate, it is our
understanding that access agreement with the new owners of the adjacent parcel has not-
been finalized. This Department will extend the deadline for commencement of remediation
activities until August 20, 1993. Please be aware that failure to comply with this date could
jeopardize your eligibility to receive reimbursements from the UST Cleanup Fund Program.
Please inform this office at least 48 hours prior to starting' remediation activities. If you have
any questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By:. Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: Read Investments c/o John Sears
Winifred Thomson
Donna Roberts
Central Valley RWQCB
~gough~gilbert.ltr
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 'M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR V Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
May 7, 1993
Mr. Tom Gilbert
P.O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, CA 93285
SUBJECT: Underground Storage Tank Remediation, Leo Black Estate,
3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Gilbert: ~
This Department has considered your request for approval to proceed with the remediation
of petroleum-contaminated soil at the subject property .only. It is the Department's
understanding that site access to the Grossman's property for remedial action is being
negotiated between the involved parties. Based on the information recently provided to
this office, Grossman's Inc. appears to have previously granted a temporary license and
easement to the Leo Black estate for remedial action. This Department requests that this
matter be resolved and access agreement documentation be provided to this office no later
than June 7, 1993.
Should an amicable agreement not be reached by the above date, this Department may
consider the owners of the Grossman property responsible for cleanup of petroleum
contamination that has migrated to their property. If you have any questions regarding this
correspondence, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials .Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:ch
cc: Richard K. Blankstein, Esq.
Winifred Thomson CjO~7 ~[
Donna Roberts
CV RWQCB
gough~iibert.let
.. DARLING, MACLIN & THOMSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CURTIS DARLING TELEPHONE
SUITE 8BO BANK OF AMERICA BUILDING
BRUCE MACLIN lB05) 3E~-BOTB
WINIFRED THOMSON 1430 TRUXTUN AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2411 TELECGPIER
May 17, 1993
MAY
Isabel Young .~'lJJ~JJj
Canned Foods
2000 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710-1918 ..
Re: License And Temporary Easement Agreement
Leo Black Estate (Pierce Road Property, Bakersfield, CA)
Dear Ms. Young:
it was a pleasure' speaking.'with .yotj..today.:=.Wehave been
advised by the prior owner that Read Investments has purchased the
vacant parcel adjoining property owned by the Leo Black Estate in
Bakersfield, California. As we discussed, enclosed is a draft of
the "License And Temporary Easement Agreement" by which Read
Investments would give access to its property on Pierce Road in
Bakersfield, California to the Leo Black Estate in order thBt the
Estate would be able to remediate underground storage tank
contamination on estate property and on the Read Investments'
property.
Please note that we need 'to know what form of entity Read
Investments is, and the jurisdiction of its formation. We have
assumed it is a corporation, and need the state of its
incorporation. If it is a different form of entity, we need to
know that, and where it.is formed.
You will also note that the we will need to insert the dates
that the Estate anticipates beginning its remediation work, and the
date that the right of entry will terminate, unless, as provided by
paragraph 5, extended by reasons beyond the control of the Estate.
I will insert"~At .in~qrmation in the final, draft. Please advise
me as to the exact nat~"'and durmtion of use made of the Read
Investments property, or I can discuss this with Mr. Geertsen, so
the environmental consultants can plan accordingly.
Please contact me if you have any further questions or
comments at this time. I would appreciate review of this agreement
on behalf of Read Investments. Thank you for your anticipated
cooperation.
Very~truly yours,
Winifred~homson
WT/sld
Enclosure
cc: Tom Gilbert w/encl.
Donna Roberts w/encl.
KernCounty Health Svc. Dept.
Attn: Dorothy Gough w/encl.
DRAET
LICENSE AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this day of ,1993, by and
between Read Investments ("Read"), a corporation having its
offices at 2000 Fifth Street, Berkeley, California 94710-1918, and Donna Roberts and Tom
Gilbert, Co-Executors of the Estate of Leo Black (the "Estate"), having an address c/o Mr.
Tom Gilbert at P.O. Box 121, Wofford Heights, California 93285.
WHEREAS, Read owns a certain parcel of vacant land on Pierce Road in
Bakersfield, CA (the "Read Parcel"), known as Kern County Assessor's Parcel Number
332-040-23; and :
WHEREAS, the Estate owns property adjacent to the Read Parcels as described
on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorPorated by reference (the "Estate Parcel") from
which site one underground fuel tank has been removed; and
WHEREAS, the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department is requiring
remediation of contamination resulting from such underground fuel tank previously located
on the Estate Parcel (the "Estate's Contamination"), which contamination has been
determined to be on the Estate Parcel and which may extend to the Read Parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Estate believes that there may be contamination on the Read
Parcel resulting from sources other than the underground storage tank removed from the
Estate Parcel, which the Estate has no duty to cure or remove; and
WHEREAS, the Estate is about to undertake site remediation work upon the Estate
Parcel to cure or remove the Estate's Contamination, which work may require access
upon the Read Parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Estate will also undertake site remediation work upon the Read
Parcel to cure or remove the Estate's Contamination from the Read Parcel, if any, if
during the site remediation the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
requires remediation of any contamination of the Read Parcel by the Estate's
Contamination; and
WHEREAS, Read desires that such work be conducted in. a good and orderly
manner and that the Estate perform such work relative to the Read Parcel as may be
required by the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these presents, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
1. Read hereby consents to the entry upon the Read Parcel by the Estate (through
its duly authorized contractors, engineers and consultants, all of whom shall be of good
reputation and experienced in the type of work to be performed) for the following
purposes:
a.' For such access by vehicles and workers as may be necessary in
connection with the site remediation work to be performed upon the Estate Parcel;
and
b. For the excavation upon the Read Parcel and, if necessary, remediation
of such soil and other materials as may be necessary or appropriate in connection
with the removal from the Read Parcel of all of the Estate's Contamination thereon
(but not any other contamination).
2. All work performed hereunder by or for the Estate shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner, in compliance with all laws and regulations and under the
supervision of a reputable, experienced engineering or environmental consulting firm.
Read shall have the right to have its representatives observe all tests and work performed
by or for the Estate, and upon request Read shall promptly be given copies of all reports,
test results and the like obtained by the Estate or its engineers or contractors relating to
the Estate Parcel or the Read Parcel. All test and work performed by or for the Estate
shall be performed so as to cause the minimum interference with the use of the Read
Parcel.
3. The Estate shall give written notice in the manner provided below to Read at
least three (3) days in advance of commencement of any tests or work upon or entry
upon the Read Parcel, and all work upon or related to the Read Parcel shall be diligently
prosecuted to completion by the Estate after the first entry or performance of tests or
work upon the Read Parcel. In any event, such work shall commence no later than
,1993,.and be completed no later than ,1993,
subject to the provisions of paragraph 5 below.
4. During the performance of any tests or work upon the Read Parcel, or any entry
upon the Read Parcel in connection with the work performed on the Estate Parcel, the
Estate and its contractors shall maintain personal injury and public liability insurance (in
addition to their workmen's compensation insurance) naming Read as an additional'
insured, with policy limits of at least $300,000.00 for personal injury or death and
$300,000.00 for property damage arising out of the performance of any such tests or
work or an event occurring in connection with any such entry.
5. Rights of the Estate to enter upon the Read Parcel pursuant to the terms hereof
shall expire on , !993, unless a written extension agreement
is executed by the parties; provided, however, this agreement shall be automatically
extended after said expiration date or any extension thereof (but ~ot beyond the latest
date for the performance of the Estate's work as set by law, regulation or order of a
public body or officer) for as long as reasonably necessary to complete any remediation
work required by the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department in the event
that the Estate's Contamination is more extensive than currently determined, or for as
long as performance by the Estate shall be prevented by any act of God, act of a public
enemy, by strike, war, insurrection, labor disturbance, fire, flood, earthquake, dust storm,
wash-out, explosion, shortage of labor or supplies, insolvency, governmental action of any
kind, any court order or decree, or by any other cause beyond the control of the Estate.
6. From time to time, at the request Read, and in any event before the Estate or ..
any contractor or engineer or consultant enters upon the Read Parcel, the Estate shall
provide Read with copies of the insurance policies maintained by the Estate and its
contractors, consultants and engineers relative to the work described herein, and a list
of names and addresses of the contractors, consultants and engineers employed in
connection with such work.
7. This agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
8. All notices given hereUnder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have
been given when received by hand delivery or three (3) business days .after sent by the
mail if sent, postage paid, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the parties at the address designated by each party below or to such other
address which either party shall have given to the othe~ for such purpose by notice
hereunder:
If to Estate: Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert
P.O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, California 93285
With Copy to: Darling, Maclin & Thomson
P.O. Box 2411
Bakersfield, California 93303
If to Read: Read Investments
c/o Canned Foods
2000 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710-1918
9. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in
writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and contains
all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such matter, and
each party to this agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,
promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone
acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this agreement shall be valid or
binding.
EXECUTED as an agreement as of the date first above written.
READ INVESTMENTS ESTATE OF LEO BLACK
BY: BY:
, President Donna Roberts, Co-Executor
BY: BY:
, Secretary Tom Gilbert, .Co-Executor
4
EXHIBIT "A"
Real Property in the County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as
follows:
Lots 11 and 12 of Tract 1001, in the County of Kern, State of California, as
per Map of said Tract recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said
County on September 26, 1930 in Book .4, page 27 of Maps, and that
portion of Shell Street and alley adjoining said premises.
Lots 13 and 14 of tract 1001, in the County of Kern, State of California as
per Map of said Tract recorded in the Office of the County Recorded of said
County on September 26, 1930 in Book 4, page 27 of Maps, and that
portion of Shell Street and alley adjoining said premises which has been
abandoned.
EXCEPT THEREFORE 50% of all minerals.
That portion of Lot 15, Tract No. 1001, in the County of Kern, State of
California, as per map recorded September 26, 1930, in Book 4 of Maps at
page 27, Kern County Records described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner, of said lot; thence (1)
along the South line of said lot, North 89 Degrees, 12 Minutes,
13 Seconds West, 45.89 feet; thence (2) from a tangent which
bears North 2 Degrees, 20 Minutes, 17 Seconds East,
Northerly along a curve concave Easterly with a radius of
3940 feet through an angle of I Degree, 53 Minutes, 33
Seconds, an arc distance of 130.14 feet to the North line of
said lot; thence (3), along said North line, South 89 Degrees,
12 Minutes, 13 Seconds East, 39.63 feet to the East line of
said lot; thence (4), along .said East line, South 0 Degrees, 31
Minutes, 29 Seconds West, 130.00 feet to the point of
beginning. Also that portion of Shell Street, which has been
abandoned, adjoining said property.
EXCEPTING AND RESERVING unto the State of California,
any and all rights of Ingress to or egress from the land herein
conveyed over and across the above described Course (2)
and its Southerly extension to the South line of Shell Street.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM all minerals, oil, gases and other
hydrocarbons by whatsoever name known that may be within
or under the parcel of land hereinabove described without,
however, the right to drill, dig or mine through the surface
thereof.
04×0?×93 15:51 UST CLEANUP FUND ~ 91805861J429 NO. 5~2 ~-~1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNL~ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION A(~ENCY _.. ...... Pill WIL$ON. (~overnof
~-'i'ATE wATER RESOURCE8 CoI~Tfi0L BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
2014 T STREET, SUITE 130
PO. BOX 944212.
SACRAMENTO. CA 94244.2120 "
FAX (916) 227-4349
FAX (glS) 227-4530
TRANSMITTAL OF FAX HATERIAL
OATE: ~
TO: ~
FAX #~
FROM: D]'V]'STON OF CLEAN WATER PRO6RAMS'
tAX t (916) 227-4349
CLEANUP FUND FAX (91§)
(if ~vb~ d f d n. o t rece f v~ ~l l.j~ur 'FAX,
p ?ease ca 7 ! (916)
NO. OF PAGES ~ (including thts sheet)
For your information
/~---~ Per your request
/~7 For review and comments
your
REMARKS:
1/22/93
04×0?×93 15:52 UST CLEANUP FUND
"' L~D AGBNC~ ~
SITE NAME: I
~ the I~kln~ UST?
4. Date ~te~a~ a~ulr~ verifi~?
1. J~nt Claimant I~ ~ owner and/or ~ermtor?
2. Malllno addre;e/mhone no. mr~lded~ ....... ~
9;...Oontam~flon'.'~ffe/~==urr enos DemOri;Umni .......
' 5. I~'~aim~t aubm~ m~e ~an ~e claim
2. Cl~mant wa; ~=~ the =wrier ~d
4. If e~ quea~on - No, o~;r p~(e)
~d prop~y zon~ resld~t~l uae
2. UST I~t~ at prop~y improv~ by ~n
owner-oo=upl~ single family
dwelling or duplex at time of
dlso~ery?
3. U~Y'w~s n~ u~M for agricultural purposes
or for resale on or a~er t[1[~
Rl~dlnttal 8m~l Home H~tlng OII Tank~
4. U6T Io~t~ at the reNdenee of a p~aon
at time of leak discovery?
5. U6T le~at~ at prepe~ imprev~ by an
owner-oeoupl~ single family
dwelling or duplex at time of leak
discovery?
e. U~T has a ~paelty of 1,1~ g~lone or lees? .....
7, U~T ia ua~ only to store home heating oil
for =onaumptlve use en prope~y?
a, U~T was not Io~at~ on agricultural prope~y
,, ~ or after 1/1/857
04/0?/93 15:52 UST CLEANUP FUND -~ 918058613429 ;. ~ NO. 542 QOZ
..
DETAILi ~,EVII~W OHBCK~IST - ~ON~D PA~E 2
C~IM NO. ~__ LOCAL ~GENCY NO.~ ~~
Financial Review Team has determined
that the claimant uallflae for
Financial Review Team has determined --
that the u~ Pri( , Claes C.
1, reporting requirements eeti~
date re~eaee dtaeoverod verified?
2. If property aequi~ed after 1/1/84, olaimant
exerr, iead due diligen;e or
previous owner wee Ible?
3. Claimant either had or applleq for a
by 1/t/90, ot wa. able to ·
, not obtained?
4. UST i. ~=t grosNy out
permit r, .equiremente?
~. Claimant wa. reqUireq to initiate
corrective
on or befOre
SEE PAGE a_OF CHBCKUST
rea 'ulrementa?
nature, of all
elelmente and joint ~lalmant.?
· Compliance wi~h teC~Ui,emente for tame isted ~'n Sictic~n V, (Gontamirmtmn $'it'~O¢c~:~eno-e-O~O~il~tlan)"~'n'~ 8action IX. (EligiiSi~lty Requirement.)
may require lead agency confirmation. Any items that cannot be verified through the applloant and whloh will require lead agency review and
confirmation, should be highlighted for further review. In ell caeca lead agency confirmation of corre~ve action =ompllance will be required.
04×0?×93 15:54 UST CLEANUP FUND ~ 918058613429 NO. 5t;2
NOTES
.. ~
04/0?/95 15:51 UST CLEANUP FUND -~ 918058613429 NOi 542
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -CALIFORNtA ENVIR NTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
2014 T STREET, SUITE 130
PO. BOX 944212
SACRAMENTO. CA 94244-2120
FAX (916) 227-4349
FAX (gl6) 227-4530
TRANSMITEAL OF FAX MATERIAL
DATE: ~
FAX ~~
FRON= DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRN~S
FAX f (916) 227-4349
CLEANUP FUND FAX {916) 227-4530
NO. OF PAGES ~ (including this sheet)
For your information
/~---7 Per your request
/~-7 For your review and comments
R[MARKS: ~
0~×07/9~ ~5:52 UST CLEANUP FUND ~
SITE
NAMe:
C~IMANT INFORMATION A~G.[ REJ. ROW iNFORMATION WAS VERIFIED
3. All t~Ul[~ t~ ID numbers provide?
4. gato'lJ~]M~s a~ulr~ verified? ............. ' ' '
2. Olaim~ =~t°~lvo amies
2. T~ ~D number provide? ~
2. ~ailin0 address/phis no, pr~lded? /
........
1. geoGri~tion of tank afl~ use verified? ~'~
2. ~l~r~..f~rm tank? Yes [ N~
3, L~klng tank =ontaln~ eligible ,ub~;. e? ~
4. Is there any evlden;e that the UAR was the
result ef · spill, ove~ll or gross ~
~'-if Claimant submi~ more than one claim ............ ' ' '
for the .~e. ~h claim is for a ~
separate occurrence? ~
8. Site map provide? ~
~. ~l~Jmant was b=~ the =wrier and opmetor
................. at time ~ I.k di.covery? ~ ~ No
3. Claimant ia the ~urrent owner and operator? ~ ~ No/NA
4. If either question - No, other p~y(e)
Ddod~.~e~ WaC verified? ~ ..................
A. Priority Glaeo A
Resld~flal Minor Fuel Tanks~
1, UST Io~t~ at the residence of a per.on
and property zon~ realdent~l uae
only at time of teak discovery? _
owner- oceupl~ single family
dwelling or duplex et time of I~k
3. U~T was n~ us~ for agricultural purposes
or for re~e on or after 111/8~
Residential 8mall Home H~flflg OII Tanks
4, UST lo.ted at the residence of a p~s~
at time of leak discovery?
5. UST IoGat~ at prope~y improved by ~" '
owner-oeeupl~ single family .:
dwelling or duplex at time of leak
discover? .......
g. UST has a capacity of 1,100 gallons or lees_~ .....
7, U~T i~ used only to stere home hosting ell "'/
for consumptive uae on property?
8. U6T we~ net Io~st~ en agricultural property ..... ' '
on or after 1/1/e57
04/0?/93 15:52 UST CLE~qNUP FUND ~ 9188586,13429 NO. 542
DETAIL~ ~EVIEW CHECKLIST - CONT'D PAGE 2
$1:,...k ,.,
LC..LAIMANT INF, ORMATION ....... I ACCL, REJ. I HOW !N. FORMAT'I~:~N WA:9 VERIFIED .....
Priority Ciasa ~ .................
Financial Review Team has determined
claimant ualifies for ~.~.~
Financial Review Team has determined ~. , .
that the claimant ¢ ~laltfiee tar Pti* r Class C.
1, rectq
date release discovered varified?
2. If property a=quifed after 1/1/84, claimant
exercised duo dlllgenGe o~'
p,r, evioue owner w.a~ eliglble?
3. Claimant ~lther had or applied for a
by 1/1/90, or wes able to
sube. tantlate why not obtained?
4. UeT i8 not grossly out of compliance
permit .r,,e.~. uiremente?
~. Claimant was required to inltlete
=orre~ve av-'t~on ?
g. :if.;~a!man{-clleeovered UAR prior to
..... :;~t'~*""lO.~'~'~"v"or b.for.'~ti°n we,. ~ ~
regulatory requirements? SEE PAGE 3 OF CHECKLIST
8, Claimant le tn compliance with flnan,
ulremenis?
1. Claim natures of all
claimants and joint =laimante?
PROSLEM AREAS AND ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Comp anco w th re~ulrement~ for"item~ listed t-n'-Se~i'~n ¥, (contamin&bo~=$'it'~i'o¢c~i;ren~-e-D~;'~;iptiOn)'-~-n'd ~action IX. (Elig'il3illty R~luirements}
ma~ require lead agency conflrmat~on. Any items that cannot be verified through the applicant and whleh will require lead agency review and
~onflrmetlon, ehould ba highlighted for further review, In all cases lead agency confirmation of corrective action eompllance will be reqCred.
04/07,'93 15:55 LIsT CLEANUP FUND ~ 'B18058613429 N0.54~ Q04
CLAIM NO.~ L~'~ LOOAL A, iNGY NO..~~
81TE ADDRESS
_ ... t ~:Y~-q~~__~,'-~~ .~~ r~~
,..~.!~ -... 7/~ - ~., .~ o~~:f ~~,~, ~~ ,_ ..
'. ... ~~ ~~..~~~~ ,~ ~. ..
. . ); ' _ j I ,
L :,'~ _ ~~ ~ '
/-/.
I l ~ ~ = . ,I..14 ~ ~ ...~at ~. cl~mant ia ~ substantial ompliange wl~ ~orre~lv~ a~lpn ~ulrem~ta.
the ~lal~a~t ls i~ compliance witk e~llable eorrealw a~loa requirements.
15:54 UST CLEANUP FUND '~ 91-805861~429 NO. 542 [~05
NOTES
ST~,TE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA ENV~( AGENCY (~ PETE WILSON, Governor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
2014 T STREET. SUITE 130.
P.O. BOX 944212
SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120
(916) 227-4307
(916) 227-4530 (FAX)
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Leo Black Estate APR g 0 1993 ,,".
P.O. Box 121 ..
Wofford Heights~ CA 93285
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND, CLAIM NO. 004076
The State Water Resources Control Board [State Board)takes pleasure in issuing the attached Letter of Commitment
an amount not to exceed ~24,000. This Letter of Commitment is based upon our review of the corrective action costs
incurred to date and your application received on January 17, 1992 and may be mod/f/ed by the State Board in writing by
an amended Letter of Commitment.
The State Board will take steps to withdraw this Letter of Commitment after 90 calendar days from the date Of this
transmittal letter unless you proceed with due dil~qence with your cleanup effort. This means that you must take positive,
concrete steps to ensure that corrective action is proceeding with all due speed. For example, if you have not started your
cleanup effort, you must obtain three bids and sign a contract with one of these bidders within 90 calendar days. ff your
cleanup effort has already started and was delayed, you must resume the expenditure of funds to ensure that your cleanup
is proceeding in an expeditious manner. You are reminded that you must comply with all regulatory agency time schedules
and requirements. We constantly review the status of all active claims, and failure to'proceed w/th due diligence will be
grounds for withdrawal of this Letter of Commitment.
You should read the terms and conditions listed in the Letter of Commitment,
,4/so attached is' a "Reimbursement Request" package. The package includes: ..
· Instructions for the completion of the "Reimbursement Request" form and should' be fei/owed when seeking
reimbursement for corrective action costs incurred after January 1, 1585.
· A "Reimbursement Request - Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund" form which you must use to request
reimbursement of costs incurred.
· A "Spreadsheet" which you must use in conjunction w/th your Reimbursement Request.
· Samples of two completed Reimbursement Request forms and associated spreadsheets.
· . A "Bid Summary Sheet" to document data on bids received.
· Recommended M/n/mum Invoice Cost Breakdown.
·A "Certification of Non-Recovery From Other Sources" which must be returned before any reimbursements can
be made.
ff you have any questions regarding the Letter of Commitment or the Reimbursement Request package, please contact
Susan Phillips at (916) 227-4366.
Sincerely,
Dave Deaner, Manager ~
Underground Storage Tank
Cleanup Fund Program
Attachments
cc: Kern County Environmental Health Central Valley Regional 8oard
2700 "M" Street, Ste 300 3443 Rout/er Rd., Ste A
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Sacramento, CA 95827-3098
A ttn: Delores Gough A ttn: Gordon 8eggs
CLAIM NO: 004076 AMENDMENT NO: 0
CLAIMANT: Leo Black Estate BALANCE FORWARD: 0
CO-PAYEE: None
THIS AMOUNT: $24,000
CLAIMANT ADDRESS: P.O. Box 121
Wofford Hts, CA 93285 NEW BALANCE: $24,000
TAX ID / SSA NO.: 95-6792747
Subject to availability of funds,, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board)
agrees to reimburse Leo Black Estate for eligible corrective action costs at 3090 Pierce
Rd., Bakersfield, CA 93309~ The commitment reflected by this Letter is subject to all of
the following terms and conditions:
1. Reimbursement shall not exceed $24,000 unless this amount is subsequently modified
in writing by an amended Letter of Commitment'
2. The obligation to pay any sum under this Letter of Commitment is Contingent upon
availability of funds. In the event that sufficient funds'are not available for
reasons beyond the reasonable control of the State Board, the State'Board shall not
be obligated to make any disbursements hereunder; If any disbursements otherwise
due under this Letter of Commitment are deferred because of unavailability of funds,
such disbursements will promptly be made when sufficient funds do become available.
Nothing herein shall be construed to provide the Cla'imant with a right of priority
for disbursement over any other claimant who has a similar Letter of Commitment.'
3. Unless modified in writing by the State Board, this Letter of Commitment covers work
through Phase II of corrective action work.
4. Ail costs for which reimbursement is sought must be eligible for reimbursement and
the Claimant must be the person entitled to reimbursement thereof.
5. Claimant must at all times De in ~ompliance with all applicable state laws, rules
and regulations and with all terms, conditions,.and commitments Contained in the
Claimant's Appliqation and any supporting documents or in any payment requests
submitted by the Claimant.
6.. No disbursement under this Letter of Commitment wilt be made except upon receip~ of
acceptable Standard Form Payment Requests duly executed by or on behalf of the
Claimant. Ail Payment Requests must be executed by the Claimant or a duly
authorized representative who has been approved by the Division of Clean Water
Programs.
7. Any and all di~bursement~ payable under this. Letter of Commitment may be.w~thheld if
the Claimant is not in'compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 5 .above..
8. Neither this Letter of Commitment nor any right thereunder is assignable by the
Claimant without the written consent of the State Board. In the event of any such'
assignment, the rights, of the assignee shall be subject to all terms and conditions
set forth in this Letter of Commitment'and the State Board's consent.
9. This Letter of Commitment may be withdrawn at any time by the State Board if
completion of corrective action is not performed with reasonable diligence.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Letter of Commitment has been issued by the State Board this 14t___~h
day of April, 199--3.
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD ~A~ usE:
~- $0530
C~ief, Oivision~%ministrative'Services
DARLING, MACLIN & THOMSOF~
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
April 26, 1993
Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested Parcel
Number: P 430 231 158
Richard K. Blankstein, Esq.
Posternak, Blankstein & Lund
100 Charles River Plaza
Boston, MA 02114
Re: Leo Black Estate Cleanup Of Underground
Storage Tank Contamination On Grossman's
Property, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Blankstein:
In 1991, an agreement was drafted between Grossman's, IncL and
the Leo Black Estate by which the Estate was given a license and
temporary easement to enter onto the property of Grossman's, Inc.
for the purpose of removing contam/nation from an underground
storage tank which had been removed from the Leo Black Estate
property. Due to lack of funds, the Estate did not go forward with.
the remediation. It appears that the Estate will have the funds
available soon to proceed with the removal. Therefore, a redraft
of the agreement has been enclosed, updating the agreement pursuant
to the current situation. I would appreciate your reviewing the
enclosed agreement, and contacting me with regard to any comments
or questions you may have.
Very truly yours,
~inifredL~omson
WT/sld
Enclosure
cc: Donna Roberts w/encl.
To~Gi~bert w/encl.
eb~_~q~a~Gough
Kern County Environmental
Health Department w/encl.
LICENSE AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this day of ,1993,. by and
between Grossman's, Inc. ("Grossman's), a Delaware corporation having its offices at 200
Union Street, Braintree, MA 02184, and Donna Roberts and Tom Gilbert, Co-Executors
of the Estate of Leo Black (the "Estate"), having an address c/o Mr. Tom Gilbert at P.O.
Box 121, Wofford Heights, California 93285.
WHEREAS, Grossman's owns a certain parcel of vacant land on Pierce Road in
Bakersfield, CA (the "Owned Parcel"), used in connection with the adjacent Grossman's ·
store; and
WHEREAS, Grossman's leases a parcel of land adjacent to the Owned Parcel, on
which is located the Grossman's store (the "Leased Parcel"); and
WHEREAS, the Estate owns property adjacent to the Owned Parcel (the "Estate .
Parcel") from which site (the Estate represents).one underground fuel tank has been
removed; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that there has been contamination resulting
from such underground fuel tank previously located on the Estate Parcel (the "Estate's
Contamination"), which contamination' has been determined to be.on the Estate Parcel
and which Grossman's believes may extend to the Owned Parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Estate believes that ~mination on the_Q~ne__d~
Parcel and the Leased Parcel resulting from sources other than the underground storage
tank removed from the Estate Parcel, which the Estate has no d_uty to cure or remove;-
and
WHEREAS, the Estate is about to undertake site remediation work upon the Estate
Parcel to cure or remove the Estate's Contamination, which work may require access
upon the Owned Parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Estate will also undertake site remediation work upon the Owned
Parcel to cure or remove the Estate's Contamination from the Owned Parcel, if any, if
during the site remediation it is determined there is contamination of the Owned Parcel
by the Estate's Contamination; and
WHEREAS, Grossman's desires that such work be. conducted in a good and
orderly manner and that the Estate perform such work relative to the Owned Parcel and
Leased Parcel as may' be required so as to remove therefrom any of the Estate's
Contamination which has entered either of such Parcels from the Estate Parcel (directly
or indirectly) and, only to the extent required due to the presence of the Estates
Contamination, bring the Owned Parcel and Leased Parcel into compliance with all
applicable state, local and federal rules, statutes and regulations relative to hazardous
waste and hazardous materials (as the same are defined in any state, local or federal
rules, statutes or regulations) which have migrated or escaped from the Estate Parcel, but
not as to such not so migrating or escaping from the Estate Parcel, as determined by the
Kern County Environmental Health Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these presents, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
1. Grossman's hereby consents to the entry upon the Owned Parcel by the Estate
(through its duly authorized contractors, engineers and consultants, all of whom shall be
of good reputation and experienced in the type of work to be performed) for the following
purposes:.
a. For such access by vehicles and workers as may be necessary in
connection with the site remediation work to be performed upon the Estate Parcel;
and
b. For the excavation upon, and removal from, the Owned Parcel of such
soil and other materials as may be necessary or appropriate in connection with the
removal from the Owned Parcel of all of the Estate's Contamination thereon (but
not any other contamination); but
c. Not for the transport on or to, or storage or treatment on the Owned
Parcel of any hazardous materials or waste, or any soil or materials containing the
same.
2. If and to the extent that any of the Estate's Contamination (but not any other
contamination) is found upon the Leased Parcel, the Estate shall cause the same to be
removed, consistent with the terms hereof, and the parties shall promptly enter into a
reasonably appropriate agreement by which the Estate shall have such access to the
Leased Parcel as the Estate may reasonably require in connection with the performance
of such work, such that the Estate shall not be required to unreasonably delay its
remediation work.
3. All work performed hereunder by or for the Estate shall be performed in a good
and workmanlike manner, in compliance with all laws and regulations and under the
supervision of a reputable, experienced engineering or environmental consulting firm.
Grossman's shall have the right to have its representatives observe all tests and work
performed by or for the Estate, and Grossman's shall promptly be given copies of all
reports, test results and the like obtained by the Estate or its engineers or contractors
relating to the Estate Parcel or the Owned Parcel or the Leased Parcel. All test and work
performed by or for the Estate shall be performed so as to cause the minimum
interference with the use of the Owned Parcel and the Leased Parcel.
4. The Estate shall give written notice in the manner provided below to
Grossman's at least three (3) days in advance of commencement of any tests or work
upon or entry upon the Owned Parcel, and all work upon or related to the Owned Parcel
shall be diligently prosecuted to completion by the Estate after the first entry or
performance of tests or work upon the Owned Parcel. In any event, such work shall
commence no later than ,1993, and be completed nO
later than ,1993, subject to the provisions of paragraph 9
below.
5. During the performance of any tests or work upon the Owned Parcel, or any
entry upon the Owned Parcel in connection with the work performed on the Estate Parcel,
the Estate and its contractors shall maintain personal injury and public liability insurance
(in addition to their workmen's compensation insurance) naming Grossman's as an
additional insured, with policy limits of at least $300,000.00 for personal injury or death
3
and $300,000.00 for property damage arising out of the performance of any such tests
or work or an event occurring in connection with any such entry.
6. The site remediation work to be performed by the Estate relative to the Owned
Parcel shall be performed by removal therefrom of all contaminated soil and materials due
to the Estate's Contamination for remediation or disposition at another site, all in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Promptly after such removal of such
soil and materials, the uncontaminated soil at the Owned Parcel shall be graded to a level
surface as close as possible to its prior topography, and the Estate shall install such.
fences, retaining walls or the like as Grossman's may deem to be reasonably appropriate
or necessary to prevent personal injury or property damage resulting from the altered
condition of the Owned Parcel. Promptly after remediation of the soil and m~terials
removed from the Owned Parcel (such that the same are free of contamination), but in
any event by ,1993, subject to the provisions of paragraph 9
below, the Estate shall cause the Owned Parcel to be restored to its prior condition, using
such remediated soil and material and/or other appropriate fill, compacting the soil to at
least its prior level of compaction, and bringing the Owned Parcel to its prior elevation and
topography, with all landscaping being restored or replaced to substantially its prior
condition. Before returning any remediated soil or material to the Owned Parcel, the
Estate shall provide Grossman's with reasonably satisfactory evidence that the same is
free of the Estate's Contamination (as evidenced by the report, release or other document
of the Kern County Environmental Health Department).
7. The Estate shall indemnify and hold harmless Grossman's, its employees and
representatives, and the owner of the Leased Parcel with respect to any claim, action,
suit, liability, demand or obligation arising, or alleged to arise, in connection with (i) tests
or (ii) site remediation work (of the Estate Parcel or Owned Parcel) performed by or for
the Estate, or (iii) any contamination of the Owned Parcel or Leased Parcel arising out of
the eScape onto the Owned Parcel or Leased Parcel of the Estate's Contamination
(directly or indirectly) from the Estate Parcel or released by reason of the Estate's site
remediation work, or (iv) the Estate's entry upon the Owned Parcel, by itself or by its
contractors or engineers. Such indemnification shall include, without limitation,
4
reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, the reasonable fees and expenses of engineers
and consultants, and all reasonable costs and expenses arising out of litigation or
administrative procedures. Without limiting the foregoing, the Estate shall indemnify and
hold harmless Grossman's from and against all loss, cost, liability and expense (including
reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) incurred or arising out of the removal by the
Estate, its agents and contractors, of any materials from the Owned Parcel or Leased
Parcel and/or the treatment, transport, storage, use or disposition of the same, except
for any such loss, cost, liability and expense arising from the negligence or reckless or
wilful acts of Grossman's, its employees, agents and invitees (other than the Estate and
its agents and contractors).
8. The Estate shall promptly provide Grossman's with copies of any' and all
surveys, reports, studies or agreements of which the Estate has actual knowledge relative
to the contamination or risk of contamination of the Estate Parcel, the OWned Parcel or
the Leased Parcel, whether now existing or hereafter obtained.
9. Rights of the Estate to enter upon the Owned Parcel pursuant to the terms
hereof shall expire on . ,1993, unless a .written extension
agreement is executed by the parties; provided, however, this agreement shall be
automatically extended after said expiration date or any extension thereof (but not beyond
the latest date for the performance of the Estate's work as set by law, regulation or order
of a public body or officer) for as long as reasonably necessary to complete any
remediation work the Estate is required to complete in order to comply with applicable
laws in the event that the Estate's Contamination is more extensive than currently
determined, or for as long as performance by the Estate shall be prevented by any act
of God, act of a public enemy, by strike, war, insurrection,, labor disturbance, fire, flood,
earthquake, dust storm, wash-out, explosion, shortage of labor or supplies, governmental
action of any kind, any court order or decree, or by any other cause beyond the control
of the Estate.
10. From time to time, at the request Grossman's, and in any event before the
Estate or any contractor or engineer or consultant enters upon the Owned Parcel, the
Estate shall provide Grossman's with copies of the insurance policies maintained by the
5
Estate and its contractors, consultants and engineers relative to the work described
herein, and a list of names and addresses of the contractors, consultants and engineers
employed in connection with such work.
11. Nothing in this agreement shall be deemed to limit or bar any other rights or
remedies which Grossman's may have, by law or contract, against the Estate or, others,
with respect to any contamination of the Owned Parcel or' Leased Parcel.
12. This agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns, including Without limitation any
successor owner or tenant of the Owned Parcel or Leased Parcel.
13. All notices given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have
been given when received by hand delivery or three (3) business days after sent by the
mail if sent, postage paid, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the parties at the address designated by each party below or to such other
address which either party shall have given to the other for such purpose by notice
hereunder:
If to Estate: Leo Black Estate
c/o Tom Gilbert
P.O. Box 121
Wofford Heights, California 93285
With Copy to: Darling, Maclin & Thomson
P.O. Box 2411
Bakersfield, California 93303
If to Grossman's: Grossman's, Inc.
200 Union Street
Braintree, MA 02184
Attn: Real Estate Dept., Exec. V.P.
With Copy to: Posternak, Blankstein &Lund
100 Charles River Plaza
Boston, MA 02114
Attn: Richard K. Blankstein, P.C.
//
//
14. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in
writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and contains
all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such matter, and
each party to this agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,
promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone
acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other
agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this agreement shall be valid or
binding.
EXECUTED as an agreement as of the date first above written.
GROSSMAN'S, INC. ESTATE OF LEO BLACK
BY: BY:
, President Donna Roberts, Co-Executor
BY: " BY:
, Secretary Tom Gilbert, Co-Executor
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
LEO BLACK ESTATE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
SOIL AERATION
AND
EXCAVATION BACKFILL
02060010.002
I. General Informa~ion
A. Prolect Information
The property is located at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California, and is owned by
the Leo Black Estate. The attorney representing Leo Black Estate is Mr. Curtis Darling,
Esq. Exploratory trenching and excavation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil from an
underground gasoline storage tank has resulted in a stockpile of gasoline contaminated
soil that will require on-site aeration. A permit to aerate the soil has been obtained.
The site is considered an OSHA prescribed Health and Safety Level D for purposes of
personal protective equipment and clothing.
B. Services Requested
The services required for this project include:
TASK 1: BACKFILL EXISTING HOLE
Backfill the existing excavation as much as possible with existing clean soil available on-
site. Compaction costs should include costs for either: (1) non-certified fill with
approximately 90 % compaction or (2) certified fill with 95% field density compaction.
Certified compaction efforts will be conducted under supervision of a State of California
licensed Soils Engineer or Geotechnical Engineer.
TASK 2: AERATION OF STOCKPILED GASOLINE CONTAMINATED SOIL
Conduct the services as necessary to aerate on-site approximately 425 cubic yards of
gasoline contaminated soil. Assume aeration will take 14 days at a rate of 30 cubic
yards per day based on an estimated average concentration level of contamination
(total volatile hydrocarbons) of 1000 parts per million. Confirmation soil 'sampling will
be performed to determine areation completness. Aerated and compacted,
Page I
nonhazardous soil will be also backfilled into remaining excavation.
II. Proposal Information and Reo_ulrements
A. General Instructi0ns
The proposal shall be made in accordance with the following general instructions:
1. Only written proposals will be acceptable. No oral, telegraphic or
telephonic proposals will be considered.
2. The consultant will be responsible to review the existing on-site conditions
and anticipated conditions expected to be encountered, character, quantity
and scope of work to be performed, and the reporting and operation
requirements of Mr. Darling.
3. Questions regarding ~his RFP should be directed to Susan Chandler Kiser,
WZI Inc. (805)326-1112.
B. Business Address
Consultants shall furnish Mr. Darling with their business address. Communications
directed either to the address so given or to the address listed on the proposal, and
deposited in the U. S. Postal Service by Certified Mail shall constitute a legal service
thereof upon the consultant.
C. Proposal Format and Contents
For ease in review and to facilitate evaluation, the proposals submitted' for this project
should be organized and presented in the order requested as follows: /
Page 2 /
(~over Pa~e_:
Indicate the name of firm and project title.
Section I - Or,qanizational Information:
Provide specific information concerning your firm in this section. If two or more
firms are involved in a joint venture for this project, information concerning the
working relationship between the firms, i.e., prime contractor/subcontractor, must
be provided.
Section II - Qualifications and Experience:
Provide specific information in this section conCerning your firm's capabilities and
experience as it relates to this project. Names, addresses, and telephone
numbers of client references for whom you have performed related work should
be provided. Contractors must provide documentation of current California
General Engineering Class A Contractors license with the HAZMAT certification.
Copies of O.S.H.A. 40 Hour Health and Safety Traning for Hazardous Waste
Workers as prescribed in CFR 1920.130. Certificates showing completion of
training for personnel to be involved with the project and a copy of your
company's health and safety program must also be provided.
Section III - Professional Team:
Identify key professionals to be assigned to this project. Include their resumes
and qualifications. Those individuals identified are required to be assigned to the
project in the capacity shown.
Page 3
Section IV - Project Approach and Work Schedule:
The proposal shall include a description of the methodology developed to
perform all required services. A schedule containing specific milestones and
dates of completion shall be included.
Section V - Cost of Services:
The proposal shall include an estimate of personnel time and total cost for each
identified task or activity in the project approach. The billing rates for all
personnel anticipated to be involved in the project and any and all other direct
costs (outside services) shall be included.
Section VI - Insurance:
Proposal shall reflect insurance for (1) $1,000,000 for a Combined Single Umits
Comprehensive General Uability policy covering Personal Injury Uability, Property
Damage Uability and Contractual Uability; (2) Workers' Compensation Insurance,
and (3) Automobile Uability in the combined amount of $500,000.
Leo Black Estate and Mr. Darling shall be named as additional insureds.
D. Selection Process
1.. All proposals received by the specified deadline will be reviewed by Curtis Darling
for content, related experience and professional qualifications, If it is deemed
necessary, Mr. Darling will conduct interviews as part of the final selection
process.
Page 4 ;
2. Mr. Darling reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive
informalities and minor irregularities in any proposal received.
3. Mr. Darling reserves the right to select the proposal which in his best judgement
best meets the needs of the site.
E. Proposal Submission
Submit two copies of your proposal to:
Mr. Curtis Darling, Esq.
Darling, Maclin and Thompson, Attorneys at Law
1430 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 4:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 11, 1993 AT THE
ABOVE OFFICE AND ADDRESS. PROPOSALS SUBMITTED AFTER THE ABOVE
DEADLINE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
Page 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. General Information
A. Project Information
Services Requested
'11. Proposal Information and Requirements
A. General Instructions
B. Business Address
C. Proposal Format and Contents
D. Selection Process
E. Proposal Submission
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 Location Map
Exhibit 2 Required Analytical Methods
.TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pa,qe
I. General Information
A. Project Information
B. Services Requested
I1. Proposal Information and Requirements
A. General Instructions
B. Business Address
C. Proposal Format and Contents
D. Selection Process
E. Proposal Submission
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 Location Map
Exhibit 2 Required Analytical Methods
f-',~i--~ . . .4 -' .,"
...... ,i. ~ :. .'~a ·
o'.'= ~.-. .SITE LOCATION -.
~/.. .0,~. .,
22 t o o;O~ /
oiY sump o
r.! ~. o %* l- .~ ////
/ /. IIII
~": ~.
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
HYDROGEOLOGIOAL INVESTIGATION
B~ERSFIELD, OALIF~NIA
L~A~N
0 2000'
I ' , ~ ~ IN~ ~RSF~. CA
EXHIBIT 2
REQUIRED ANALYTICAL METHODS
'Parameter EPA Method No.
BTEX 8020
TPH-G 8015 modified
02060010.002
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. 2700 'M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
November 19, 1992
Mr. Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Ms. Donna Roberts
1004 Lorene Street
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Underground Tank Site Investigation,
Leo Black Electric, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Ms. Roberts and Mr. Gilbert:
On November 5, 1992, your file was reviewed by State Water Resources Control Board staff
with the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Program (Cleanup Fund). The purpose
of their review was to determine if you are in compliance with corrective action orders and
directives. Compliance with corrective action orders and directives is a requirement for
reimbursement of cleanup costs from the Cleanup Fund.
As a result of their review, it has been determined that you are currently not in compliance
because implementation of the approved remedial action plan was not completed. For cases
such as yours, the Cleanup Fund is providing responsible parties with an opportunity to
come into compliance, provided the regulatory agency will issue a revised corrective action
directive. You must take positive concrete steps to come into compliance.
Please-refer to the attached memorandum from the Cleanup Fund regarding their
requirements before a Letter of Commitment can be issued obligating funds to assist you
with the cleanup of your site.
Accordingly, you are hereby directed to begin the necessary work at your site within sixty
(60) calendar days from the date of this letter. The required work shall include:
1. Implementation of the July 1990 remediation workplan, including revisions.
2. Submittal of report of field activities and results within 60 days from the date of
groundwater sampling.
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Ms. Donna Roberts
November 19, 1992
Page 2
PleaSe notify this office on any proposed changes in this investigation, such as revision of
specific task, change of contractor, etc.
If you have any questions regarding the provisions of this letter and/or the necessary work
at the site, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:eh
cc: UST Cleanup Fund
gough~gilben.let
'$Ti~ OF CALIFORNIA- CALIFORNIA I~ -~ ~AGENCY ~' PETE WtLSON, G~
. STATE'WATER RESOURCt:o ~)NTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROQRAMS ~
"' 2014 ¥ STREET. SUITE 130
· KO. 80X944212
SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120
(gl6) 739-4106
(916) "/39-2300 FAX
TO: CLAIMANTS TO THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
CLEANUP FUND
SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND PROGRAM, COMPLIANCE
WITH CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDERS AND DIRECTIVES
My staff recently reviewed the regulatory agency's records for the purpose of
verifying the eligibility of your' claim-H~plication currentl~ on the -
Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Priority List.
In order to be eligible for reimbursement from the Cleanup Fund the claimant
must be in compliance with (1) provisions of Chapter 6.7 of the California
Health and Safety Code; (2) correc~ive action orders and directives; and (3)
the.Corrective Action Regulations (Article 11, Chapter 16, Division 3, Title
23, California Code of Regulations.
Our review of the regulatory agency records determined that'you are currently
not in compliance with corrective action directives and therefore are not
eligible. Under circumstances such as yours the regulatory agency believes
that there is justification to provide you with an opportunity to come into
compliance and may be issuing a revised directive and schedule. Compliance
with this directive and schedule may allow the Cleanup'Fund to find you in
compliance with corrective action directions and therefore eligible for
reimbursement from the Cleanup Fund.
You must take pos£tivet concrete steps to come into compliance.
Upon submittal of documentation of compliance with the revised directive and
schedule, and =he,resolution on any other.eligibility or priority'issues, the
Cleanup Fund will review your claim and determine whether a Letter of
Commitment can be issued to you.
Documentation must consist of (1) a copy of the regulatory agency's revised
directive; a copy of the Invitation for Bid and responses.(if appropriate);
(3) a copy of the contract with the consultant chosen; and (4) copies of
invoices, etc. showing that work is underway and that costs are being
incurred.
If such work is not bid, contracted for, and initiated within the 90 day
calendar period, the Cleanup Fund will take steps to remove your claim from
the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Priority List.
You are reminded that the Cleanup Fund requires three bids (estimates) from
qualified firms for corrective action costs to be eligible. The first $10,000
of eligible costs is exempt from the three bid requirement. I suggest that
you review our "Cleanup Fund Corrective Action Guide" for help with selecting
consultants and contractors.
Please contact the Cleanup Fund at (916) 739-4106 if you have questions
regarding this notice.
Sincerely,
D~ve Deaner, Manager
UST Cleanup Fund
FILE
~TATE OF CALIFORNIA ' ·/'* "* '~i~ PETE WILSON, Governor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTEOL BOARD.~\\~
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS :3 ~' .~:~\ ~\~ ' ' '
2014 T STREET, SUITE 130 ' ~ ~ "::~ii'~ )~
P.O. aox 944212 ¥ ~ '.~ ~ '~',~ ~',
SACRAMENTO, CA94244-2120.
(916) 739-4345 ,, ~'
(916) 739-2300 FAXES',,,, .............
Darling, Maclin and Thomson 2 5 1991
~. O. Box 24[[
B~e~sE~e[~ C~ 93303
~D~G~O~D S~O~G~ ~ (US~) CO5~ ~COV~Y~ ~ CO~Y~
S[~ ~O.~50[[9
~e have ~ece~ved you~ [e~e~s da~ed Nove~be~ 20~ [990 and
ffanua~y [4~ [99[ concerning o~ US~ Cleanup S~e Invoices da~ed
Decembe~ [8~ [989~ and ~ug~s~ [5~ ~990. ~e apologize ~o~
~hen ~e~n Courtly ~aza~dous ~a~e~a[s Section (County)
contamination a~ ~he above s~[e, ~hey pZaced ~he s~e ~n~o ~he
~oca[ Ove~s~gh~ ~og~a~ ~o~ ~u~he~ ~nves~ga~on
~Z [5, [989 (copy encZosed). ~he ~ [5, [989 [e~e~ gave
an expZa~a~on oE ~he County's ~oZe ~n ~h~s p~og~am and also you~
~nvo~ce ~e~e costs ~ncu~ed by ~he County and ~he ~eg~ona[
Qua[~[y Con~o[ ~oa~d ~n pe~o~ng ove~s~gh~ services
o~e~ed ~o ~u~he~ c[a~y ~he costs contained ~n ou~ ~nvo~ces.
· he ~nvo~ce contains seve~a[ categories o~ costs. S~e s~ec~c
cha~ges ~ep~esen~ ~hose cha~ges ~o~ ~o~ done ~ha[ ~s d~ec~Zy
~e[a~ed ~o you~ c[~en~s s~e. ~xa~Zes oE such ac~v~es
~ncZu~e: sampling ~o~ so~[ o~ g~ound~a~e~ contamination,
con~uc[~ng s~e ~ns~ec[~ons, ~ev~e~ng ~e~o~s and ~o~Zans,-o~
p~epa~ng correspondence. ~c~v~es pe~o~ed ~o~ you~
s~e a~e ~e~zed on ~he b~[Z. ~ description o~ ~c~v~y codes
~s encZosed ~o~ you~ ~e~e~ence.
~og~am ~anagemen~ cha~ges ~nc[ude ail o~he~ Courtly costs
associated ~h ~n~a~ng and ~a~n~a~n~ng p~og~am operations
~h~ch a~e cha~ged as d~ec~ cha~ges ~o ~he ~ocaZ'Ove~s~gh~
~og~a~. ~he County's p~og~a~ ~anagemen~ cha~ges ~ncZude
saZa~es and beneE~s ~o~ ~echn~ca[ s~aEE, one accoun~ c[e~ and
one con~ac~ ~anage~. ~he hours and ~as~s cha~ge~ ~o p~og~am
~e~a~ed ~o only one specific s~e as [he s~e-spec~c cha~ges
d~scussed above a~e. ~og~am managemen~ cha~g~s also
~eg~ona[ ~a~e~ QuaZ~y Con~oZ Board ~o~X ~e[a~ed ~o ~oca[
Ove~s~gh~ ~og~am s~es.
Ms. Winifred Thomson -2-
The program management charges may include the work coded with a
first digit of "7" or "4" on the enclosed invoice activity code
sheet. As stated in our letter, there are local and state
program management charges. Local agency program management
includes both start-up (program development) and ongoing
activities (program implementation). State program management
includes both the State Board and Regional Water Quality Control
Board (Regional Board) work. The bill includes Regional Board
program management charges, but not State Board program
management. Your client will be billed in the near future for
State Board program management.
As stated in our invoice cover letters, your client's share of
program management charges depend on how much site-specific time
was charged to the site, compared with all site specific time
charged by the local agency. For example, if 10 hours were
charged to your client's site, and 1,000 hours were charged to
all sites, then your client's share of program management costs
would be 10 divided by 1,000 or one percent.
The following is a breakdown of program management charges billed
to your client's site on December 18, 1989 and August 15, 1990,
respectively.
SITE PROGRAM PROGRAM REGIONAL SITE
HOURS DEV. IMPLE. BOARD SPEC. TOTAL
4.0 $ 85.26 $607.67 $256.10 $119.06 $1,068.09
9.0 $191.84 $833.45 $199.17 $278.81 $1,503.27
Program development, program implementation, and Regional Board
(Program Management) costs are allocated to each site by
mathematical calculations. You may use the enclosed Program
Management Worksheets to calculate your portion of the program
management costs.
As we previously mentioned, your client will be receiving in the
near future an invoice which covers our State Board program
management time. State Board program management charges cover
all activities by State Board staff which benefit the overall
Local Oversight Program management. Examples of such activities
include: general management and administrative support,
accounting, program guidance and implementation, t~_~~_
general community relations support, report and proposal writing,
contingency planning and contractor support.
State Board program management also covers all activities by
State Board staff related to the enforcement and cost recovery
aspects of the Local Oversight Program. Examples include
receiving and processing invoices and enforcement documents,
preparation and processing of responsible party bills and
Ms. Winifred Thomson -3-
payments, and any extended cost .recovery actions.
Your letter requested a breakdown of the indirect costs also.
The indirect cost rate ("IND# column on Itemized New Charges page
of invoices) covers any costs incurred by the County in
administering the program which are not charged directly (hour-
by-hour) to the program. The nature of these services are that
they benefit more then one County program. The County includes
the following items in their'indirect cost rate: data
processing, Director's salary, building costs, telephone costs,
insurance, transportation and travel costs, training and contract
services. These costs are placed in a cost allocation plan and
charged back to each County program as a percentage of salaries
and benefits. The County's indirect cost rate for the Local
Oversight Program is 51 percent.
If you have any questions please telephone Donna Schimeck at
(916) 739-2464 or Lori Casias at (916) 739-4344.
Sincerely,
Enclosures
/
cc: ~Ms. Susan Gonzales
Kern County Hazardous Material
Section
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Env{ronmentaJ Heakh Sewice~ Department'
RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR ' ^i, Pollution Control District
DAVID PRICE ill VaLLL~M J. RODD¥, APCO
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR F'lanning & Development Se~ces Department
TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
October 24, 1990
Thomas Gilbert
2000 Julian Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Subject: Location: 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
Permit ~: 050119
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
This letter is to confirm our October 11, 1990, telephone conversation
regarding the delay in the. implementation of the remediation workplan at the
subject site. Until such time as this project is initiated, please inform us on
the status on a bi-weekly basis.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-
3636 extension 545.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
0G:cas
\050119.1tr
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636
FAX: (805) 861-3429
., 2700 M STREET IN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME HEALTH OFFICER
MAIUNG ADDRESS Leon M I.tebertaon, M.D.
1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
:' BAKEI~I'SFIELD, CA 93301 DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(805) 861-3636 Vernon S. Relchard
June 27, 1988
Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian AVenue ~
Bakersfield, California 93304
Re: Soil and Groundwater Contamination Detected Beneath the 500
Gallon Oasoline Tank at Leo Black Electric, 3909 Pierce Road,
in Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The site characterization report prepared for Leo Black
Electric, 3909 Pierce Road, in Bakersfield, California was
received and reviewed by a representative of this department. The
following information was provided in that report: j
1. Four sol1 borings were drilled and sampled to assess the
soil around the old tank site. One boring (LB2) was
drilled east, two borings (LB6 and LB3) were drilled west,
and one boring (LB1) was drilled south of the old tank
site. Significant levels' of volatile hydrocarbons were
detected tn two soil borings (LB1 and LB3) which extended
down to the water table. There were no groundwater
monitoring wells installed at the site.
2. The soil samples showing the highest levels of volatile
hydrocarbons were retrieved beneath the tank excavation
during tank removal.
3. The boring labeled LB2 had elevated otl and grease levels
at 5 and 10 feet below grade. The levels of otl and grease
present in' samples retrieved from LB2 were significantly
higher than the levels beneath the tank and in other
borings assessed.
DISTRICT OFFICES
13,~lJnn · L.,~mnnt i ;kc I~.~l'mll; Moiave · Ridaecrest Shafter · Taft
Tom 6ilbert
June 27, 1988
Page 2
The following Information must still be obtained regarding the
contamination plume.
1. Information must be provided on contamination present in
the soil on the north side of the old tank site.
2. Oroundwater samples must be retrieved to assess the extent
of contamination in groundwater supplies affected by this
site.
3. A description of the vertical and lateral boundaries of the
contamination plume in groundwater must be provided.
4. Information on the source of heavy hydrocarbon
contamination must be provided.
It will therefore be necessary~ for you to provide this
department with a hydrogeologlcal investigation workplan within 30
days. The workplan 'must be prepared under the direction of a
California Registered engineer, engineering geologist, or
geologist with at least 2 years experience doing hydrogeological
investigations. A copy of the workplan and all other reports must
also be sent to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control
Board. The workplan must be approved by this department before
any assessment work is performed.
A copy of this department's outline is enclosed. It may be
used as a guide for preparation of your report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(805) 861-3636.
F, nvironme~al~alt~Speciall2
Hazardous:~ateri~a-l-~ ~anagement Program
AEG/gb
cc: Bill Baster, Regional Water Quality Control Board
Susan Klser, Wilson Zublln Inc.
LABORATORIES
J. J. EGIIN. REG. CHEM. ENGil.
PETIIOLEUM
MAIN OFFIGE: 41QQ PIERGE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. S3308 PHONE
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MC NABB CONST. ATTN: BRIAN MC NABB Date of
2616 STARK STREET REPORT:2-19-8?
BAKERSFIELD~ CA. 93305 LAB No.:2437
Sample Description: LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
5' UNDER TANK
DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
2-10-87 2-11-87 2-17-87
Minimum
Reporting Analyses Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene Hg/g 31.55 0.10
Toluene ~g/g 909.30 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ~g/g 323.59 0.10
p-Xylene , Hg/g 1983.96 0.10
m-Xylene Wg/g 1983.96 0.10
o-Xylene Hg/g 2004.81 0.10
Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g 29.73 0.10
Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g 2807.57 0.50
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons Wg/g 10074.47 0.10
EPA 5020/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS
COMMENTS: Oil ~ Grease: 153 mg/kg
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present
(C1 to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are
in addition to, the constituents specifically defined on this report.
Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater
than any other constituent, or the combined total.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated
constituents on this report.
LABORATORIES
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGI.
PETflOLE~IM
MAIN OFFIGE: 4100 PIERGE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. g3308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MC NABB CONST. ATTN: BRIAN MC NABB Date of
8616 STARK STREET REPORT:2-19-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:2436
S~mp le 'Descr ip ~L~
2 UNDER TANK ~_ ~ ~ _'.... ~
DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
2-10-87 2-11-87 2-17-87
Minimum
Reporting Analyses Reporting
C°nstituent~ Units Results Level
Benzene Hg/g 5.84 0.10
Toluene Hg/g 50.36 0.10
Ethyl Benzene Hg/g 23.94 0.10
p-Xylene Hg/g 148.28 0.10
m-Xylene Hg/g 148.28 0.10
o-Xylene Hg/g 188.39 0.10
Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g 10.91 0.10
Volatile Hydrocarbons Hg/g 1~59.39 0.50
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g 2034.79 0.10
EPA 5020/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS
COMMENTS: Oil ~ Grease: 130 mg/kg
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present
(C1 to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are
in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report.
Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater
than any other constituent, or the combined total.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated
constituents on this report.
Analyst
DARLING, MACLIN ~, THOMSON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
BRUCE MACLIN SUITE 850 BAN~ OF AMERICA BUILDING (~05) 3~-~07~
WINiP~EO THOMSON 1430 T~UXTUN AVENUE
~OST O~FIC~ BOX ~411
DAVID B. DAY BAK[RSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93303
January 10, 1990 ~-~
Mr. Steve McOalley ~/~.:, __~'. ,~,,'
Kern County Environmental Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Road
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Dear Mr. McCalley:
Leo Black Electric Estate, hereinafter called "the Estate",
has been diligently cooperating with the Kern .County Health
Department since early in 1987 in the resolution of the
contamination which was discovered at 3909 Pierce Road.
A recent court Judgement in Kern County (California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region vs. Sabre
Refining, Inc.) has direct bearing on the additional studies
being required by the Kern County Health Department at Leo.
Black Electric, 3909 Pierce Road. A copy of that Judgement
is attachted.
Inasmuch as the Estate is analogous to Sabre's situation in
many ways and is located within the same "historical
contamination of a larger 25 square mile area of groundwater
by numerous persons other than defendants" (p. 3, lines 7-9),
the estate should not be required to perform any further soil
or water studies.
As a resolution of their situation, the Estate proposes to
excavate the contaminated soil and replace it with clean
soil. The contaminated soil will be disposed of properly.
With that action, hazards to surface use will have .been
removed and any incremental groundwater contamination which
may have been possible due to overlying soil contamination
will also have been removed.
Mr. Steve McCalley
January 10, 1990
Page Two
My client wishes to bring this compliance matter to
resolution as soon as possible. Therefore, I will call in a
~ew days to.arrange an appointment to discuss this matter
with you.
Very truly yours,
DARLING,~M~LIN & THOMSON
CD:Jl
STATE OF'CALl FORNIA ~ GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
STATE WATER RESO RCES CONTROL BOARD
PAUL R. BONOERSON BUILDING
901 P 'STREET
P.O. BOX 100
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95801
(916) 324-6509
May 9, 1990 : ! /.~?~ .,'
Mr. Curtis Darling
Darling, Maclin & Thomson
Attorneys at Law
Bank of America Building
1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 850
Bakersfield, CA 93303
Dear Mr. Darling:
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC, 3909 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD
Mr. Steve McCalley of Kern County Environmental Services
forwarded a copy of your letter of January 10, 1990 to the Fresno
office of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,'
Central Valley Region (Regional Board), and requested that the
Regional Board respond to the letter. Your letter concerns the
remedial action at the Leo Black Electric facility in
Bakersfield. Both the Regional Board and Kern County disagree
with your conclusions and proposals in that letter.
You have stated that Leo Black Electric Estate is in a position
analogous to the situation involving Sabre'Refining, Inc. as
determined in the recent court decision in Kern County, People el
rel California Reqional Water Quality control Boardr Central
Valley Region v. Sabre Refininqr Inc., Case No. 183100 (Cal.
Superior Ct. Sept. 27, 1989). That case has no bearing on Leo
Black Electric. The Sabre Refining case would have a bearing on
Leo Black Electric only if the issues decided by the court were
identical to issues involved in the Leo Black Electric facility.
That is not the case. The Sabre Refining case involved different
parties, a different location, and different factual and
technical issues than are involved at the Leo Black Electric
site. The court in the Sabre Refining case made no decisions
concerning the type of contamination, the nature of the soil, or
the location or flow of ground water at the Leo Black Electric
site. Investigations concerning soil and ground water
contamination are often difficult and technically complicated.
Contamination caused by one facility in one location may have no
bearing or connection to contamination by another facility.
Mr. Curtis Darling -2- May 9, 1990
Without an investigation to determine location and flow of ground
water and the extent and type of contamination any comparisons
between facilities is not possible. Further, the court in the
Sabre Refining case stated that the contamination in the area was
caused by "numerous persons other than defendants." Leo Black
Electric may be "other persons", that have.caused contamination in
the area since it has caused contamination at its facility.
The Estate's proposal to excavate the contaminated soil and
replace it with clean soil but not perform any further soil or
water 'studies, is not acceptable to either Kern County or the
Regional Board. Leo Black Electric is obligated to perform
necessary investigations of soil and ground water contamination
and to remediate contamination caused by the company. Litigation
concerning another discharger in another location is no excuse
for failure to comply with state law.
If Leo Black Electric fails to perform the necessary actions
required by Kern County, the County is likely to refer the case
to the Regional Board for enforcement action.
incerely,
~Frances M~ _
cc: Mr. o~6~n J. Harlow Principal Engineer
Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Central Valley Region
3614 East Ashland Avenue
Fresno, CA 93726
Mr. Steve McCalley~
Kern County Environmental Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Ms. Sylvia Cane Hale
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90010
RANDALL L. ABBOTT 2700 M Street, Suite 300
Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3502 Telephone (805) 861-3636
~.~ .,*":.',~.. ..' ~. Telecopier (505) 861-3429
.ire~o, RESOURCE M } ENT AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
~,',, ...,~. . ...
HEALTH SERViCES
August 14, 1990
Curtis Darling
Darling, Maclin & Thomson
Attorneys at Law
Bank of America Building
1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 850
Bakersfield, CA 93303
SUBJECT: Location: 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
Permit #: 050119
Dear Mr. Darling:
(ii We have reviewed WZI's response to our comments on the July,
!9~0., Site Remedtakion Workplan for the subject site. The'revised
....... wofkplan-'i~' acceptable to'-~thls Department and must be implemented
by September 17, .L990. -.--
Please ~ot~f~ this Department at ]east 48' hours prior to
startin~ work. I~ 'you have any questions regarding this matter,
please call me at {~O~) 86~-~636, ext. 545:
Sincerely,
Dolores GougH
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:Jg
cc: Susan Kizer, HZI Inc.
4800 Easton Dr~ve' , .,u,te' 114
Bakersfield, California 93309
Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
805/326-1112
805/326-0191 FAX
VVZl INC.
August 10, 1990
Ms. Delores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield
Permit #050119 ..
By request of Curtis Darling, Attorney for Leo Black Estate, WZI is herein responding
to your letter of July 30, 1990. The work plan will be revised to include the following:
1) Background Organic Vapor Meter levele will be established at an area
outside the known area of contamination.
2) At least four (4) sidewall samples from each sidewall (total of four) will be
collected.
3) The same numbering verification samples upon completion of aeration as
was collected prior to aeration will be collected.
4) The soil will be aerated to non-detect levels or disposed of at an appropriate
disposal facility.
We appreciate your cooperation in handling this matter and look forward to prompt
approval of the July 199~o.-{sit_e.' Remediation Work Plan.
....s.... ~ ......%',, Very truly yours,
\,?.~:~ ~,~Jt,~ ~' Susan Chandler Kiser, R.G., R.E.A.
'~"~.~ Vice President, Project Development
SCK/jb
0206.0010A.010
RES~RCE MANAGEMENT AG~CY
RANDALL L. ABBOTT
Director ~ STYE McC~, R~S, DIRE~OR
W~.~ J. ~. A~'O
T~ J~ES, AICP. DIRE('I'OR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
July 30, 1990
Curtis Darling
Darling,. Maclin & Thomson
Attorney at Law
Bank of America Building.
1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 850
Bakersfield, CA'g3303
SUBJECT:. Location: 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
Permit ~: 050119
Dea6 Mr. Darling:
We have reviewed the July 1990, Site Remediation Workplan prepared by WZI
Inc., .for the subject site. The following shall be resolved prior to granting
approval of the workplan:
1. Contrary to your proposed procedure for establishing background OVM
readings (page 1),'such background levels shall be determined at an area
outside the known area of contamination.
2. Regardless of. whether the excavation is in contact with groundwater,
samples shall be collected from each sidewall (for a total of at least
· 4 samples). It is recommended that you perform, at a minimum, the above
number of sidewall samples. Should your office choose otherwise, an
alternate sampling protocol consistent with SW-846 guidelines may be
proposed.
3. Verification sampling conducted upon completion of aeration shall be
performed in the same manner (i.e. number of composite samples) as that
prior to aeration of the contaminated soil.
4. The workplan did not detail the clean-up levels of the sidewall samples
and the verification samples after aeration.
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861.3636
RECYCLED PAPER FAX: (805) 861'-3429
Curtis Darling
July 30, 1990
Page 2
Please address the above items by August 10, 1990. If you h~v/e any questions
regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636, Ext.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Haterials Special
Hazardous Haterials Hanagement Program
DG:ch
cc.' Sue Kizer, WZI Inc.
dolores\darling, let
DARLING, MACLIN & THd,~N
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 850 SANK OF AMERICA BLDG.
1430 TRUXTUN AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2411
BAKERSFIELD; CALIFORNIA 93303
Ms. Delores Gough
Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: Leo Black Electric
Case #: 050119
Dear Ms. Gough:
Enclosed is a copy of the Site Remediation Workplan for the referenced project with
revisions per your request during your meeting with WZI Inc. on June 5, 1990.
The additions to the previously submitted workplan include the following:
o Details of the soil sampling procedures
o Aeration procedures as defined by Regulation 8, Rule 40
o Screening Health Risk Assessment for soil aeration
o Map of proposed groundwater monitoring well locations
If you have any questions regarding the workplan or require additional information,
please contact Susan Kiser at WZI Inc. 805/326-1112.
Sincerely,
CURTi~
Curtis Darling
REVISED TECHNICAL APPROACH
LEO BLACK ESTATE
After consideration of comments received from Kern County Health Department in a
letter dated 2-6-90 and in a technical meeting on 1-31-90, it is proposed to deal with
the contamination problem at Leo Black Estate in the following manner:
Phase I Contaminated soil excavation/aeration per guidelines provided to WZI Inc.
by the County (Exhibit 1).
Phase II Determination of groundwater gradient from adjacent.wells as identified in
Exhibit 2 in accordance with County guidelines of one-half mile radius
outlined in UT-50. Drill and install 2 groundwater monitoring wells (one up
gradient and one down gradient) to characterize the current water quality
beneath the property. The drilling, sampling, 'installation protocols as well
as the Health and Safety Plan for this site were previously described in the
workplan submitted to the County on 11-29-88, supplemented on 5-10-
89 and deemed acceptable on 2-6-90.
Phase III Analysis of Water Samples.
Upon receiving the water analyses, all the available data will be integrated
within one-half mile of the site, including those off-site wells used to
establish' the water gradient. A report will be prepared summarizing the
field activities, the collection of data and analysis of any groundwater
contamination found beneath the Leo Black Estate.
REGULATION 8
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
RULE
AERATION OF .CONTAMINATED SOIL
AND
REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
(Adopted July 16, 1~86) "
8-/i0-1 O0 OENERAL
8-~0-101 Description: The purpose of this Rule is to limit the emission of organic
compounds from soll that has been contaminated by organic chemical or
petroleum chemlc-al leaks or spills; to describe an acceptable soil .aeration
procedure; and to describe an acceptable procedure for controlling emissions from
underground storage tanks intended for removal.
8-~0-110 Exemption, Storage Piles: Calculations of aeration volume under Section S-~10-
204 shall not include Storage piles that are covered per Section 8-~0-303; nor
shall they include active storage piles.
8-/10-111 Exemptlont Excavated Hole: The exposed surface of 'an excavated hole shall not
be included in calculations of aerated volume under .Section 8-tl0-20~t.
8-/10-112 'Exemptlo~, .Sampllng: Contaminated soil exposed for the sole purpose of
sampling shall not be considered to be aerated. Removal of soil for sampling shall
not qualify a pile as "active."
8-~i0-113 Exemptlon~ l{on-volatlle Hydrocarbons: The requlrem,:ntsof this Rule shall not
apply if the ~oil is contaminated by a known organlc chemical or petroleum liqu;d,
and that chemical or liquid has an initial boiling point of ~02°F or higher, provided
that the soil is not heated.
8-Ji0-200 DEFINITIONS
8-~i0-201 Active Storage Pile: A pile of contaminated soil to which s011 is currently being
added or from which soil Is currently being removed. Activity must have
occurred or' be anticipated to occur within one hour to be current.
8-~0-202 Aeratlom Exposure of excavated contaminated soil to the air.
8-~0-203 Aeration Oepth: The smaller of the following: the actual average depth of
contaminated so|l; or 0.15 meters (0.5 feet) multiplled by the daily frequency with
which sou is turned. The exposed surface area includes the pile of excavated soil
unless the pile is covered per Section 8-q0-~0~.
8-~0-20~ Aeratlon Volume: The volume of soll being aerated shall be calculated as
follows: the exposed surface area (In square feet or square meters) shall be
multiplied by the aeration depth.
8-~0-205 Contaminated So11: Soil which has an organic content, as measured using the
procedure in Section 8-q0'-602, exceeding 50 ppm(wt).
8-~10-206 Organic Compound: Any compound of carbon, excluding 'methane, carbon
monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates and
ammonium carbonate.
8-N0-3 -'JULY 16, 1~)86
Exhibi~ 1'
8-40-207 Organic Contentz The concentration of Organic compounds measured in the
composite sample collected and analyzed using the procedures In Sections 8-40-
601 and 8-~0-602.
8-110-208 Vapor Free: The process of purging gases from a tank using dry Ice to replace
organic vapors with an Inert atmosphere.
8-40-20~ Ventilation: The process of purging gases from a tank by blowing or drawing
another gas through the tank.
8-40-300 STANDARDS
8-40-30! Uncon~olled Aeration: A person shall not aerate contaminated soil at a rate in
excess of that specified in Table 1 for the degree of organic contenr~ The
limltations in Table 1 apply to the entire faculty, and indlcate the volume of
contaminated soll that may be added, on any one day, to soil that is already
aerating.
Table 1
Allowable gate of Uncontrolled Aeration
og0^ lc C0 TE T,' g^T£ OF UNCO TR0 L 0 ^ RAT 0
ppm (weight)(~/~i'~ Cubic meters/day Cubic yards/day
(50 Exempt from this Rule. Subject to Rule 8-2.
50-100 q59.0 600
100-500 ~)1.8 120
500-1000 q$.~ 60
1000-2000 22.9 30
2000-3000 11.5 15~
3000-~000 7.6 10
~000-5000 5.7 8
)5000 0.08 0.1
8-40-302 Controlled Aeration: SoU may be aerated at rates exceeding the limitations of 8-
q0-301 provided emlsslons of organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by
at least ~)0~ by weight.
8-40-303 Storage Piles:' Contaminated SOU which is not being aerated shall be covered
except when sou is being added or removed. Any uncovered contaminated soil
will be considered to be aerated. The soil may be covered with a layer of
uncontaminated sou no less than six Inches deep; or it may be covered with a tarp
or other covering, provided no head space where vapors may accumulate is
formed.
8-40-310 Undergro~Jnd Storage Tanks--Oecommlssloning: Any person wishing to
permanently decommission an underground storage tank which previously
contalned organic compounds shall follow the followlng procedure:
310.1 All piping shall be drained and flushed Into the tank or other container.
~10.2 AIl liquids and slUdges shall be removed, to the extent posslble, from the
tank. It may be necessary to use a hand pump to remove the bottom few
Inches of product.
:310.3 Vapors shall be removed from the tank using one of the following three
8-i~O-Z~ JULY 16, 1986
methods:
3.1 The tank may be filled with water, displacing vapors and
hydrocarbon liquids. Water used for this purpose must be collected and/or
disposed of in a manner approved by the AP¢O.
3.2 Vapor freeing.
3.3 Ventilation.
8-JI0-311 Vapor Freeing: No person shall vapor free a tank containing more than 0.001
gallons of liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unless eml.ssions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at least 90%.
8-1~0-312 Ventllatlon~ Ho person shall ventilate a tank containing more than 0.001 gallons
of liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unless emissions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at' least
8o~0-~00 A0FllNISTRATIVE REQUIREiqENTS
8-Ji0-1~01 Excavatlon of Contaminated 5oi1: The person resoonslble for aeration of any
contaminated soil shall provide the 01strictt by telephone, with the following
information. Thls shall be provided no less than 2~ hours prior to the spreading or
heating of any contaminated soil. The 0istrict shall be notifled
a~y of the parameters change.
/401.1 Estimated total quantlty of soil to be aerated.
/401.2 Estimated quantity of sol1 to be aerated per day.
q01.3 Estimated average degree of contamination, or total organ!c content of
soil.
q01.q Chemlcal composition of contaminating organic compounds (i.e.t gasoline,
methylene chloride, etc.).'
401.5 A description of the basis from which these estimates were derived (soil
analysis test reports~ etc.).
8-1~0-600 HANUAL OF PROCEOURES
8-~0-~01 Soll Sampling: One composite sample shall be collected and analyzed for every
50. cubic yards of excavated contaminated sou to be aerated. At least one
composite sample shall be collected from each inactive, uncovered storage pile
within 2/4 hours of excavation. Samples are not required if the soil is
uncontaminated.
601.1 Each composite sample shall consist of four separate soil samples taken
using the procedures described below. The soil samples shall remain
separate until they are combined in the laboratory .just prior to analysis.
601.2 Samples shall be taken from at least three inches below the surface of the
pile. Samples shall be taken using one of the following two methods:
1.1 Samples shallbe taken using a driven-tube type sampler, capped and
sealed with inert materials, and extruded in the lab In order to reduce the
loss of volatile materlalsl or
1.2 Samples shall be taken using a clean brass tube (at least three inches
long) driven into the sou with a sultable instrument. The ends of the brass
tube shall then be covered with aluminum foil, then plastlc end caps, and
finally wrapped with a suitable tape. The samples shall then be
immediately placed on ice, or dry ice, for transport to a laboratory.
8-/40-5 .JULY %6, %986
8-~0-602 Measurement of Organic Contentz Organic content of sou shall be determined by
the Reglonal Vater Quality Control Board's Revised Analytical I1ethods,
Attachment 2~ 11/8/85~ or any other method approved by the APCO.
8-40-603 Determination of Emissions: Emissions of organic compounds as specified in
Section 8-~0-302 shall be measured as prescribed in the Hanual of Procedures,
Volume IV, ST-7.
8-~0-6 JULY
oWA'¢
/2
0 "
'::',TEXA
REFINE
0
Sum /!
o 1/2 MILE
". I ·'. RADIUS
I/I · ·
·
ILl,
· ,,, .'d ,' i ·
mmmm
LE(~END .,
p_id. POWER MACHINERY. 3818 PIERCE ROAD:
CONTAMINATED SOIL
D.O. DAVIES OIL CO., 3505 1~2 GULF STREET: .:
FREE PROOUCT PLUME FF, FERENCE: WATER ELEVATION,
SEFr. 1087
U.C. UNION CARBIDE. 3505 PIERCE ROAD: (lC:WA- I.D.;N)
G,ROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED
V.P. VALLEY PERFORATING
LOCATION MAP & NEAR BY
CONTAMINATION SITES
~) lO~' 2oo'o'
- 4/00
~Z! ]NC.
UORD PROCESSING JO8 TZClCET
DESCRIPTION: :"~/1-~ ~,: ~. '' .f': ,lOB DUE DATE:
PROJECT
ORDERED BY: ~<~-('~-~__.~ STORED A~,': -C:/O / O/~l (~ 0 ~
I Tilde DATE & TildE STAT. FORH TYPED PROOFED
DATE IH TildE REO OUT COOE* COOE* DESCRIPTIONS & IHSTRUC:TIOI~S BY BY
~'STll IONERY COOES *FORH COOES
B=BOND D=DRAFT
L=LETTERHEAD F=F ]NAL
E=ENVELOPE
1 DARLING, MACLIN & THOMSON
Attorneys at Law
2 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 850
Bakersfield, CA 93301
~ (805)325-5075
4: Attorneys for Petitioner, ~ ~-"'"
6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
8 In the Matter of the Estate-of'~ ) Case No. 33764.
)
9 LEO BLACK, ) PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
)
10 Deceased. )
)
11
13 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (1013a, 2015.5 C. C. P.)
STATE-OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN
! am a resident of the county aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled
]. 4: action;, my business addre~ is:
........... 15 1430 Truxtun Avenue. Suite 850. Bakersfield~
......... 16 0, June 27, . 19 90 . ;se~edthewithin EX PARTE ORDER INSTRUCTING
17 EXECUTORS
18 on the interested parties
in said action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the
].9 United States mail at .. Bakersfield, California
addressed a~ follows:
20
21 ** SEE ATTACHMENT **
~4
~7 ! declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
June 27, 1990 Bakersfield, California
28 Executed on at
~ARLING, MACI.,I N
& DAY
ATTONNIYI AT ~..AW : ~"~ ':~
IurrK eoo lANK OF
1430 TRUXTUN AVINU~ $?UA~r6 ?.,.~ ?IU~AVER JULIE YON
pO~'t' OFFIr'B BOX ~41~ (REVISED 7-et)
ATTACHMENT "A"
Delbert L. Black Donna Roberts
1626 Pine 1004 Lorene Avenue
Oxnard, CA 93030 Oildale, CA 93308'
Patricia Kollenborn Bonnie'Winders
6308 Patton Way 5811 Pryor
Bakersfield, CA 93308 Bakersfield, CA 93308
Connie Gilbert Thomas O. Gilbert
2000 Julian 2000 Julian
Bakersfield, CA 93304 Bakersfield,.'CA 93304
J. Richard Thomas, Esq. Stephen Eyherabide, Esq.
1601 "F" Street . 1400 Chester Ave., Ste. N
Bakersfield, CA 93304 Bakersfield,'CA 93301
Barry L. McCown, Esq. Peter Lewis, Esq.
5000 California Ave., Ste. 202 .P.O. Box 2438
Bakersfield, CA 93309 Bakersfield, CA 93303
Susan Chandler Kiser Daphne Washington
wZI, Inc. Kern County Environmental Health Dept.
P. O. Box 9217 2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93389 Bakersfield, CA 93301
Chris Burger Steve Schuett
Kern County Environmental Health Dept. County Counsel
2700 "M" Street 1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 93301
(SPACE BELOW FOR FLL~G STAMP ONLY)
AI~'O RN L~'Y$ AT
(8os) s~s so7.
~0
12 LEO BLACK, ) EX PARTE ORDER
) INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS
l~ Deceased.. )
The Ex Parte Petition For Order Instructing Executors
15
of DONNA ROBERTS and THOMAS O. GILBERT, as co-executors of the
16
Estate of LEO BLACK, deceased, having been filed with the court~
17
the court makes the following findings:
18
1. DONNA ROBERTS and THOMAS 0. GILBERT ~ are
19
Co-Executors of the estate of Leo Black, deceased.
20
2. The personal representatives ~believe that they
21
should have instructions of this court concerning the following
22
matters:
The personal representatives have been advised that a
gasoline tank of approximately 500 gallon capacity is buried
real property which is located at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield,
~6
California.
~? ////
co;]~ ~8 ////
1
The personal representatives have had the property
tested by WZI, Inc., an environmental consulting company, which
company has advised the personal representatives that the
gasoline tank has leaked and has apparently contaminated the
property under and surrounding the tank. The Kern County
Environmental Health Service Department has 'issued a Corrective
Action Order No. 90-010 to the Leo Black-'Estate, which reflects
the Directives required by the County.
9 ' The personal representatives are further informed that
10
the old office and old shop of decedent need to ~e destroyed.to
11
~ermlt a clean up. The building destruction will cost approxi-
z o 12 "
o ~ ~ ~ately $7,000; the clean up of the soil may be as much ab
>~ii: ~- i- 14 15,000; and the test wells would be from $7,000 to $11,000'.
~ WZI has prepared and presented the personal
Z<z ~
u~o~ ~. 15 'epresentatlves with a proposal with regard to the proposed
<z~= ~§ 16
~i~~ lean up.
~ ~ ~ 3 The personal representatives believe that it is in
' 18
~he best interests of the estate and the interested parties that
19
be instructed and directed to employ WZI, Inc., to take the
~teps proposed to the personal representatives ~ as outlined on
~xhlbit "B" to the Ex Parte Petition For Order Instructing
~xecutors filed herein, to clean up the contaminated property,
.ncluding, but not limited to, destruction of the shop and
S4
~ffice of decedent.
~5
4. There is no other statutory procedure that covers
~6
:his matter.
27 IIII
28 iiii
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. The personal representatives, DONNA ROBERTS and
THOMAS O. GILBERT, are instructed to employ WZI, Inc., to take
the steps outlined on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incor-
§
porated herein by reference, to clean up the contaminated
6
property, including, but not· limited~ to, destruction of t'he shop
? and office of decedent.
8 DATED: June ... ;. 1990
9
11
~ ~ ~_ 1£ JUDGE OF followsTHE SUPERIORlast COURT
~ i ~ 15 (Signature
attachment)
o ' 18
19
~6
-3-
( f
REVISED TECHNICAL APPROACH
LEO BLACK ESTATE
After consideration of comments received from Kern County Health Department in a
letter dated 2-6-90 and in a technical meeting on 1-31-90, it is proposed to deal with
the contamination problem at Leo Black Estate in the following manner:
Phase I Contaminated soil excavation/aeration per guidelines provided to WZ! Inc.
'.. by the County (Exhibit 1).
Phase !1 Determination of g¢oundwater gradient from adjacent wells as identified in
Exhibit 2 in accordance with County guidelines of one-half mile radius
· outlined in UT-50. Drill and install 2 groundwater monitoring wells (one up
gradient and one down gradient) to characterize the current water quality
beneath the property. The drilling, sampling, installation protocols as well
as the Health and Safety Plan for this site were previously described in the
workplan submitted to the County on 11-29-88, supplemented on 5-10-
89 and deemed acceptable on 2-6-90.
Phase Ill Analysis of Water Samples.
Upon receiving the water analyses, all the available data will be integrated
within one-half mile of the site, including those off-site wells used to
establish the water gradient. A report will be prepared summariz!ng the
field activities, the collection of data and analysis of any groundwater
contamination found beneath the Leo Black Estate.
Exhibit "A"
REGULATION 8
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
RULE ~;0
AERATION OF' CONTAMINATED SOIL
AND
REMOVAL OF UNOERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
(Adopted July 16, 1986)
8--40-100 ~ENERAL
8-J~0-101 Oc-.x:rlptlo~: The put. pose o¢ this Rule is to limit the em;sslon oF organic
" compounds From soil that has.been contaminated by organic chemical or
petroleum chemical leaks or spills; to describe an acceptable soil .aeration
., procedure; and to descHib¢ an acceptable procedure for controlling em~ss[ons ~rom
underground s~or~gc t~nks intended for remov~l.
8-~0-110 Exemption, Scor~gePllc~ C~Iculedonso~er~tionvolum~underSec~;onS-~0-
20~ shall not .include storage piles that arc covered per Scction B-~0-303; nor
'shall they include actlv~ storage
8~0-111 Exemption, Excavat~ Hol~: Thc.cxposcd sur~ace oF an cxcavated hole shall not
be included in calculations oF aerated volume under Section 8-~0-20q.
8~0-11Z Excmptl~, Sampling: Contaminated ~i1 exposed For thc ~[e purpos~
sampling shall not be considered to be acratcd. Removal of ~il for sampling shall
not quali~y a pile as
8-~0-113 Exemption, ~on-volatile Hydr~a~on~ The r~qulrem.~nts oF this Rule shall not
apply if the ~il is contaminated by a ~no~n organic chemical or petroleum liquid,
and that chemical or liquld has an initial boiling polnt of 30Z°F or higher, provided
that thc ~il Is not heated.
B~0-200 DEFIRITIONS
B-~0-Z01 ActlvcSt~agcPllc: A pile of contaminated ~il to ~hlch ~ll is currently belng
added or from ~hich ~[I is currently being removed. Activity must have
occurred or' be anticipated to occur ~[th[n on~ hour to be currcn~
B-~0-202 Acratl~: Exposure o~ excavated contaminated ~[1 to the
B~0-203 Aeration Oep~: The smaller oF the Following: the actual average depth
contaminated ~ill or 0.1~ meters (0.S Feet) multipiled by thc dally Frequency ~ith
~hich ~[I is turned. The exposed surface area includes the pile oF excavated
uhl¢ss the pile is covered pcr Section B-~0-303.
B~0-20~ Acratl~ Volume: The volume of ~[1 being aerated shall be calculated as
follo~s: thc exposed surface arco (In square feet o~ square meters) shall be
multiplied by thc aeration depth.
B-~0-205 Con~mlnat~ Soil: Soil ~hich has an organic content, as measured using the
procedur~ [n Section 8-~0'-~02, exceeding 50 ppm(~t).
8-~0-20G Organic Comp~nd: Any compound oF carbon~ excludlng methane, carbon
monox;de, carbon dioxid:, carbonic acid~ m¢tallic carbid~s or carbonates and
ammonium carbonate.
8-40-3 "JULY 16, 1986
E.xhibi~ i
(
8-~0-207 Organic Con~ent: The concentratlon of organic compounds race.red In the
composite san~ple collected and analyzed using the procedures In Sections 8-qO-
,~01 and 8-~0-602.
~-~.0-208 Vap<x'Free: The process of purging gases from a tank using dry Ice to replace
organic vapors with an Inert atmosphere.
8-~0-20.q Ventilation: Thc process of purging gases from a (:ank by blowing or drawing
another gas through the tank.
8-J~0-300 STANOAROS
8-J~.0-301 Uncontrolled Aeration: A person shall not aerate contaminated soll at arate in
excess of that specified in Table 1 for the degree of organic content. The
]im~tations in Table ! apply to the entire facility, and Indicate the volume of
contaminated soil that may be adde~l, on any One day, to soll that is already
aerating. ...
Table"l
Allowable Rate of 'Uncontrolled Ae~atlon
-0RG^. C C0.Z?T. R^TE OF U CO TROCLEO ^ERAT O.
ppm (weight} (I/Jh~ Cubic meters/day Cub;c yards/day
<50 Exempt from this Rule. Subject to Rule 8-2.
50-100 qS9.0 -"' 600
I00-500 91.8. 120
5oo-looo qS.9 60
1000-2000 22.9 30
2000-3000 11.5 15
3000-~,000 7.6 10
qooo-5000 5.7 8
>5000 0.08 0.1
8-~0-302 'Cont.rolledAeratlon: Soll may be aerated at rates exceeding the llmltattons of So
q0-301 provided emissions of organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by
at least 90% by weight.
8-~0-)0]) Storage Plies: Contaminated soil which Is not being aerated shall be covered
except when soil Is being added or removed. Any uncovered contaminated soil
will be considered to be aerated. The soil may be covered wlth a layer of
uncontamlnated soil no less than slx Inches deep; or it may be covered with a tarp
or other covering, provided no' head SPaCe where vapors may' accumulate Is
Formed.
8~0-.tI0 Underground Storage Tanks--Decommissioning: Any person wishing to
permanently decommission an underground storage tank which previously
contained organic compounds shall follow the following procedure:
310.1 All piping shall b~ drained and flushed into the tank or other container°
310.2 All liquids and sludges shall be removed, to the extent possible, from the
tank. It may be necessary to use a hand pump to remove the bottom few
Inches of product.
310.3 Vapors shall be removed from the tank using one of the following three
8-~0-q JULY 16, 1986
methods:
].1 The tank may be Filled with water, displacing vapors and
hydrocarbon liquids. Water used For this purpose must be collected and/or
disposed of In a manner approved by the APCO.
3.2 Vapor freeing.
3.3 Ventilation.
8~0-31t Vapor Freeing: No person shall vapor free a tank containing more than 0.001
gallons of liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unl'ess emissions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at least
8-40-]12 Ventilation: No person shall ventilatea tank containing more thanO.O01 gallons
of liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unless emissions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at least ~)0~.
8-40-400 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
8-40-~i01 Excavatlon.~f Contaminated Soil: The person resoonsible For aeration of any
.. conta~ninated soll shall pi-ovide the 0lstrict, by telephone, with the following
information.' T-his shall be provided no less than 2q hours prior to the spreading or
heating of any Contamin~ted soil. The 0istrict shall be notified within 16 hours.if
any of the parameters change.
401.1 Estimated total quantity of soil to be :aerated.
401.2 Estimated quantity of soll to be aerated per day.
401.3 Estimated average degree of contamination, or total organ!c content of
soil.
401.4 Chemical composltlo~ of contaminating organic compounds (I.e., gasoline,
methylene chloride, etc.).
401.5 A description of the basis from which these estimates were derived (soil
analysis test reports, etc.).
0-~.0-600 HAHUAL OF PROCEDURES
8-40-~0] $oi| Sampling: One composite sample shall be collected and analyzed for every
50 cubic yards of excavated contaminated soll to be aerated. At least one
composite sample shall be collected from each inactive, uncovered storage pile
within 24 hours of excavation. Samples are not required If the soil is
uncontaminated.
601.1 Each composite sample shall consist of four separate soil samples taken
using the procedures described below. The soil samples shall remain
separate until they are combined in the laboratory just prior to analysis.
601.2 Samples shall be taken from at least three inches below thc surface of the
pile. Samples shall be taken using one of the following two methods:
1.1 Samples shall be taken using a driven-tube type sampler, capped and
sealed with inert materials, and extruded in the lab in order to reduce the
loss of volatile materials; or
1.2 Samples shall be taken using a clean brass tube (at least three inches
long) driven into the soil with a suitable Instrument. The ends of the brass
tube shall then be covered with aluminum Foil, then plastic end caps, and
finally wrapped with a suitable tape. The samples shall then be
immediately placed on ice, or dry Ice, for transport to a laboratory.
8-40-5 JULY 16, 1986
j~essurement, of Org~nlcConr-en~: Organic contentot'~ilsh~llbede~crmlnedby
Lhe Regional Wa~er quality Con,roi 8oard's R~vJsed Analytical He~hod~
A~achman: 2~ 11~5~ or any o~h~r method approved by the APCO.
Oe~-mlnaCl~ of Eml~lon~ Emissions o{ organic compounds as specified in
Section 8-~0-302 shall be measured as prescribed in ~he Hanual oE Procedure~
Volume IV~ 5T-7.
8.z~0.6 JULY 16, 1)86
12
~ · JOA ...........
....)~ · .:.:
'::.T EXA C
R E FI N E ~o~o~
II
Sum
o / [1/2 MILE
o · / · .-
ADIUS
B',J] REFINI °°
.,. lillY '-'~
LEGEND
~R MACHINE~, ~ f 8 PIERCE RO~:
~INA~D ~IL
D.O. DAVIES OIL ~.. 3~ I~ GU~ STREW:
FREE PROOU~ PLUME
~.1~
U.C. UNI~ C~IO~ 3~5 PIERCE ROAD: ~A- ~.~
GR~NDWA~R ~INATED
A.T. ~UR~D T~S~flr, ~a G;SS~ ROAO: B~ERSFIELD, CALIFORN~
GR~NOWA~R ~INA~D
LEO BLACK ESTATE
V.P. VA~ PER~T~
L~AT~N ~P & N~R BY
~AMINAT~N S~ES
o ~ooo' ~ooo' ~r5 ~mn J J~HIB~T 2 '
~ DATED: JUN 22 1990
5 ROBERT ANSPACH
6
8
9
~0
I o9~ 16
a ' 18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
~ L 'd 2700 M Street, Suite 3QO
GARY J. WICKS Bikerefleld. CA 93301
Agency Director . ~.'~'k~.~..~ Telephone (805)
(805) 861-3502 - U"" '
· ,f,,' ,..-., Telecop4er (805) 861.~
STEVE ~CALLEY ~~,
May 24, 1990
TO: Steve Schuett, Assistant
County Counsel's Office
FROM: Steve McGalley, Director
~"--~'~ Environmental Health Services Department
BY: Daphne H. Washington, Chief, Special Programs
SUBJECT: Estate of Leo Black Electric Company
On Thursday, May 24, I discussed with Tom Clow a request for
Counsel participation in a meeting next week on the above subject.
The issue involves the issuance of a Corrective Action Order by
this Department to Curtis Darling, attorney, executor of the
referenced estate. Mr. Darling alleges that the Department cannot
hold an estate to the same standard as an operating company, and
wishes to meet with .us and our counsel.
We would like to schedule a meeting possibly next Thursday or
Friday.
Please ¢all and advise who from your office can be available and
what date and time.
I have attached some background information on the case to bring
your staff up to speed.
Thank you for your assistance.
SMc:DHW:jg
cc: Chris Burger
Steve McCalley
1 Corrective Action Order No. 90-010
2
3
4 COUNTY OF KERN
5, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
? IN RE: Leo Black Electric Company
8 $909 Pierce Road
9 Bakersfield,'CA 93308
10
11 TO: Curtis Darling
12 1430 Truxtun Avenue
13 P.o. Box 2411
14 Bakersfield, CA 93303
15
16 AND
17
18 Tho'mae Gilbert, Co Executor
19 2000 Julian Avenue
20 Bakersfield, CA 93304
21
22 CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDER
23
24 Section 25299.37, Chapter 6.75 of Division 20 of
25 the California Health and Safety Code (H & S Code),
26 authorizes the issuance of a Corrective Action
1 Order for failure to initiate and complete a corrective
2 action in response to an unauthorized release from an
3 underground petroleum storage tank.
4
5 Violation
6 The Environmental Health Services Department of the
7 County of Kern (hereinafter the Department) hereby issues
8 a Corrective Action Order to Leo Black Electric Company
9 (hereinafter Company) for failure to comply with H & S
10 Code Sections 25298 (c)(4), 25299 (a)(5), (b)(3), (b)(4),
11 25299.36 and 25299.37. These sections require the
12 Company to take corrective action, as defined in H & S
13 Code Section 25299.14, to ensure protection of human
14 health, safety and the environment.
15
16 History
17 on December 18, 1986, Company through its agent,
18 McNabb Construction Company, made application to the
19 Department for a Permit to abandon a 500 gallon gasoline
20 tank system. On January 9, 1987, Permit #A351-O5 was
21 issued by the Department.
22 Based upon soil sample test results obtained from
23 beneath the tank at the time of removal on February 10,
24 1987, gasoline contamination of the Soil was documented.
25 An Underground Storage Tank Unauthorized Release
28 (Leak)/Contamination Site Report was completed and
-- 2 --
1 forwarded by the Department to the State Department of
2 Health Services (DHS), State Water Resources Control
3 Board (SWRCB) and the Central Valley Regional Water
4 Quality Control Board (GVRWQGB) on March 5, 1987.
5 On March 6, 1987, the Company was ordered to submit
6 a site characterization proposal to the Department within
7 thirty (30) days.
8 A site characterization work plan, prepared by WZI
9 Inc., was transmitted to the Department on May 27, 1987,
10 and approved on June 23, 1987. The plan was carried out
11 on July 1, 1987. Findings of the site characterization
12 work were transmitted to the Department on August 4,
13 1987. Gasoline constituents were found to be present in
14 groundwater underlying the s~te.
15 On August 18, 1987, the Department referred the case
16 file to the GVRWQGB for oversight due to the fact that
17 groundwater had been impacted.
'18 On May 18, 1988, the Department became a Local
1.9 Implementing Agency (LIA) for the State Underground
20 Storage Tank Pilot Program. Effective that date,
21 Jurisdiction for the case was transferred from the
22 CVRWQCB to the Department.
23 On June 27, 1988, and November 18, 1988, the
24 Department requested a hydrogeological investigation
25 workplan to assess the extent of groundwater
26 contamination underlying Company's property be submitted.
-- 3 --
1 The requested hydrogeological workplan was submitted
2 by WZI, Inc. on November 29, 1988.
3 On January 10, 1989, and April 6, 1989, Department
4 comments regarding further information necessary to
§ approve the workplan were sent to Thomas Gilbert, co-
6 .executor.
7 On May 10, 1989, the necessary information to
8 approve the hydrogeological workplan was supplied to the
9 Department by WZI, Inc.
10 On January 2, 1990, Thomas Gilbert was again
lJ notified of the need to implement the approved
12 hydrogeological workplan.
J3 Subsequent correspondence between the Company's
14 representatives and the Department as well as at least
15 two meetings have failed to produce measurable progress
46 toward implementation of the approved hydrogeological
17 workplan.
18
19 Directives
20 The Leo Black Electric Company through its
24 fiduciaries, Curtis Darling and Thomas Gilbert, is hereby
22 directed to take the following actions:
23 1. Implement the approved hydrogeological investigation
24 workplan as approved May 14, 1989, by June 15, 1990,
25 providing the Department at least 48 hours notice
26 prior to commencing work, and;
-- 4 --
1 2. Complete all of the work called out in the plan
2 referred to in provision "1" above and submit a
3 hydrogeological site characterization report by
4 August 15, 1990, or alternatively;
5 3. Submit a revised hydrogeological investigation
6 workplan to the Department for review by June 1,
7 1990, and;
8 4. Upon the Department's approval of a revised
9 hydrogeol~gical workplan referred to in provision
10 "2" above, complete all of the work called out in
11 that plan. and submit a hydrogeological site
12 characterization report within 60 days of the date
13 of Department approval of the plan, providing 48
14 hours notice to the Department prior to commencing
15 any work called for in the plan.
16
17 All required reports and any correspondence should
18 be submitted to:
19 Chris Burger, R.E.H.S.
20 Manager, Hazardous Materials Mgmt Program
21 Kern County Environmental Health
2~ Services Department
25 2700 M Street, Suite 300
24 Bakersfield, CA 93301
25 ///
I Remedies
2 Section 25299.37(f) of Chapter 6.75 of the H & S
3 Code allows the Department to undertake or contract for
4 corrective action and recover costs pursuant to Section
5 25299.53 for failure to comply with a Corrective Action
6 Order.
7 Section' 25299 of the H & S Code allows for the
8 assessment'of civil penalties for failure to comply with
9 the requirements of Chapter 6.7.
10 Failure to comply with any provision of the Chapter
11 may result in the Department imposing an administrative
12 penalty of not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00)
13 or more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per day
14 for each day the violation(s) continues.
15 ///
16 ///
17 ///
18 ///
19 ///
20 ///
22 ///
25 ///
26 ///
LE BEAU, THELEN, LAMPE & MCINTOSH
4
Defendants, -''
6 SABRE REFINING, INC. AND
SABRE REFINING, INC. DEBTOR-IN-
? POSSESSION
8
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
ex rel CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
13 QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL ) NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
VALLEY REGION ) JUDGMENT
14 Plaintiffs, )
)
15 v. )
)
16 SABRE REFINING, INC., SABRE )
REFINING, INC., CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR )
17 IN POSSESSION )
18 Defendant.
)
19
20 To the People of the State of California ex rel
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley
21
22 Region, plaintiffs, and to the California Attorney General,
23 plaintiffs' attorney of record:
24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on September 28, 1989,
25 judgment was entered in the above-entitled action in favor of
26 the defendant Sabre Refining, Inc., and against the plaintiff,
27 People Of the State of 'California ex tel California Regional
28 IIII
////
1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
2 plaintiff take nothing by way of its complaint and that
3 defendant have judgment on all causes of action of plaintiff's
4 complaint, and that defendant be and hereby is awarded its costs
5 of. suit.
' E OF THE SUPERIO .COU T
8
10
11
12
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, a copy of
2
which is attached to this notice.
DATED: October 9, 1989 LeBEAU, THELEN, LAMPE, McINTOSH &
4 CREAR
5
DAVID R. L~24PE; Attorney for '
6 Defendant Sabre Refining,.
Inc.
7
8
10
1'4
18
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (1013a. 2015.5 C.C.P.)
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
3 ) ss.
COUNTY OF KERN )
4
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
5
the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years and
6
not a party to the within action; my business address is:
7
5531 Business Park South, Suite 210, Bakersfield, California
8
93309. On. October 10, 1989 , ! served the within NOTICE OF
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT on the parties in said action, by placing a
10
true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope .with postage
thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Bakersfield,
12
California addressed as follows:
John K. Van De Kamp,
14 Attorney General of the
State of California
15 Edwin J. Dubiel .
Deputy Attorney General
Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
25 is true and correct.
26 Executed on October 10 , 1989, at-Bakersfield,
27 California.
28 Ti, .- . ..: ,_.,' ...... · ...?,,
THERESA M. SHERRILL
!
LE BEAU, THELEN, LAMP[ & HClNTOSH
5 ATTO"NEYS rOB Defendants,
SABRE REFINING, INC. AND
6 SABRE REFINING, INC. DEBTOR-IN-
POSSESSION
7
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
l0 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
1!
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
12 ex rel CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL ) JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL
13 VALLEY REGION ) BY SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs,. )
!4 )
V'. )
!5 )
SABRE REFINING, INC., SABRE )
16 REFINING, INC., CHAPTER ll DEBTOR )
IN POSSESSION )
Defendant. )
18 )
19
This cause came on for regularly for trial on April 3,
20
1989 in Department 8 of the above-entitled court, the Honorable
21
Lewis E. King, Judge, presiding, sitting without a jury, a~ jury
having been duly waived. Plaintiff appeared by its attorney,
23
Edward J.. Dubiel, Esq., Deputy Attorney General. Defendant
24
appeared by its attorney, David R. Lampe, Esq., LeBEAU, T~ELEN,
25
LAMPE, McINTOS~ & CREAR. Evidence, both oral and documentary,
26
having been presented by both parties, .the cause' having been
27
argued and submitted for decision, and a statement of decision
28
not having been requested,
· ' '- SUPEI(IOR COURT ")F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN
August 28, 1989 4;00 P.H 8
DAI'E: COURT MET AT ' D£PARTMENI' NO.,
LEWIS E. KING D.M. Ritchie
PI~ESENL NON, ,. JUDGE, . DEPUTY CLERk(
NO NO
· REPORIER BAILIFF
TITLE.* COUN$1~:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIF. Edward Dubiel, Deputy Attorney
General
YS
SABRE REFINING, INC., et al David Lampe
NATU)E OF i)IK:)CEEDINGS: ACTION NO. 1 ~ '~ 1 ~ (")
COURT DECISION
See Decision attached.
A COPY OF THIS M.O. WAS SENT TO COUNSEL THIS DATE~ DR
MINUTES
1
2
3
4
5
6 IN TEE SUPERIOR COURT OF TKR. STATE'OF CALIFORNIA
7 IN AND FOR TR3Z~ COUNTY OF K]~RN
9:
10 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 183100
ex tel CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER )
QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL' )
11 VALLEY REGION, )
)
12 Plaintiffs, )
)
13 vs. )
'
14 SAS~,~ ~J~Fi~i~, I~c., sm~RE,
REFINING, INC., CHAPTER 11 DEBTOR ) DECISION
15 IN POSSESSION, )
)'
16 Defendants. )
)
17
18 The Plaintiff, Attorney General for the Regional Wa~er
19 Control Board, filed a four count complaint for ~njunctions
20 and civil penalties on June 21, 1983, under Division ? of the
21 Watez- qode.
2~ The action is based on the alle.~ed violatSon of a cease
231 and desist order issue~ .by the Water Control Board against the
24 Defendants on December 5, 1980.
25 The Defendants went into Bankruptcy on September 28,
26 1982.
The Court f~nds that the Defendants stopped business
operations ~n 1981 and the waste water sump in issue has not
3
been used since 1981.
4
The Court grants judgment for the Defendants as' the
5
Cease and Desist Order has been moot since 1981.
8 Count ! of the complaint alleges vio]at~on of the Cease
? and Desist Order 78-24 and requests an order of the Court
8 compelling compliance by the Defendants.
9 The Court orders judgment for the Defendants. In
10 addition to the findinu of mootness, the Court is not
11 convinced that Plaintiff has proved Defendants made any
12 discharge of prohibited materials into the waters of the State
13 since the date of the Cease and Desist Order.
14 The Court denies the r'equest for a depth and areal
15 report of soil'and ground water contamination requested by
18 Plaintiff.
17 The Court has considered the evidence presented to the
18 Regional Water Control Board and the evidence presented at t'he
19 hearing in this Court. The Court is required to exercise its
20 independent ~ldgment under Chapter ? of the Water Code.
21 The order for the depth and' areal soil and water study
22 issued by the Water Board Was in violation of the Defendant's
23 due process rights in.that there was not proper notice of this
24 issue, and this. type of order is properly the subject matter
28 of an abatement and clean-up hearing and order.
26 The Court further finds that it is impossible for
1 Defendants to comply with the soil and water study because of
2 its cost of over $150,000 and the fact that Defendants do not
3 have funds to pay for such a
4 If not impossible, the Court finds that ]t would be. an
5 undue hardship on the Defendants.
6 Further, ~he study and repor~ would not be of
? substantial benefit due to the agency's report of a historical
8 contamination of a larger 25 square mile area of ground water
9 by numerous persons other than Defendants.
10 The Court further finds that there would be no harm to
11 the public interest in not requiring the report.
12 Counts 2 and $ of the Complaint allege violations of
13 the Cease and Desist Order and requests the Court to order.
14 monetary Penalties against the Defendants,
15 The C, ourt gran~.. ~udgment for the Defendants on Counts
16 2 and 3.
17 In'addition to mootness, there is insufficient proof of
181 any violation, any number of days of violation, and it is
19 impossible to determine With specificity the amount of
20 penalties.
21 Also, because Defendants are .out of business, the Court
22 would decline to impose any monetary penalties.
23 Count 4 of th'e Complaint seeks to en3oin a public
2~ nuisance.
2,~ The Court gives 3udgment to the Defendants.
26 The Plaintiff has faiied to prove a public nuisance
3
1 exists.
2 The Defendants complied with the ReGional Water Control
3 Board requirements for years. When the Water Board found it
4 necessary to change the requirements for the who]e.Fruitva]e
5 Field, the Defendants 'found that they could not comply w~th
8 the new requirements, ceased the operation, went out of
7 business~ removed waste water pipes, emptied the sealed sump
8 and went ~nto she Bankr%~ptcy Court.
9 DATED: August 24, 1989.
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
2~
23
24
25
26
4
" 4800 Easton Orivo '°,uite 114
Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
WZ! ,u~: May 10, 1989 ~NVIRONMENTAL ~qFn, *~
Amy E. Green
Kern County Health Department
Environmental Health Division
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Requested Revision ..
Hydrogeologic Investigation Workplan for" Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield
Dear Ms. Green:
The requested revisions to the Hydrogeologic Investigation Workplan for Leo Black
Electric have been prepared in accordance with your requests in correspondence dated
January 10, 1989 and April 6, 1989.
o The boring LBS-5, will be installed as a monitoring well at the former
underground tank site as shown on the plot plan (Exhibit 1).. ~Stainless
steel casing will be installed so that this well can be utilized for long term
r~onitoring.
o Permits will be obtained from Kern County Environmental Health Staff for
all monitoring wells and test holes. Test holes will be abandoned with
sand cement or neat cement mixture and will be witnessed by an
Environmental Health inspector.
o Water samples will be collected from monitoring wells according to
guidelines outlined in the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field (LUFT)
Manual. The well will be purged until temperature, conductivity and pH
stabilize - four or more well volumes. Water bailed from the wells will be
stored on site pending analytical results. Water samples will be collected
from test holes to check for floating product only.
o Soil and Water samples will be analyzed for oil and grease utilizing EPA
method .413.1 (gravimetric method).
Amy E. Green
May 10, 1989
Page Two
WZI Inc. is prepared to commence the workplan pending approval of the workplan by
Kern County Health Department and once permits are obtained for the monitoring wells
and test holes. If you need any additional information concerning the workplan, please
do not hesitate to call me at (805) 326-1112.
Very truly yours,
Laura M. Bazeley, R.G.
Manager, Geology
LMB:bc/nt
cc: Tom Gilbert
0206.30051.002
Boring
(Alternate) LBS-~I
B~oring ,,
/
t
_ -- -- /
A iNone Oetecte~ / /
ESTIMATED E~ENTOF .
SOIL CONTAMINATION BASED
ON 7/87 SOIL SAMPLING
AND G~DIENT ·
~or~~
LBS-5 ~ ~
Alternate
A LB 6 LB 3
] HYDRO~A[tBON O[X~R
TOTAL VOLATILE
HYDROCARBONS
s - (ug/g)
'5
ET
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
1 0 - [None Detected) Nor
VOLATILE HYDROCARBON
· CONTAMINATION PLUME:
'['OE MAPS and CROSS SECTIONS
N WZI INC
BAKERSFIELD°
DATE 9/88 EXHIBIT 4
1 S - ~(None ,5 2 .....
................ ~ ,..~. ........ ~ '.. .. D N . 9 9 ~
KERN COUNTY
2700 '~!' $Creec. 5te. 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Environ~ent. a~ Heal, th Deparl:men~.
(805) 861-3636
'February 7, 1989
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
SUBJECT: Location: 3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
PERMIT ~: 50119
Dear Mr. Tom Gilbert:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described
above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health'to be the site of
an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank.
This notice is sent to 'you because our records indicate that you are a
responsible party for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating
to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities.
California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code
Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result
of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE
CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED.
Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum
required site workplan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting
environmental contractors.qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms,
example illustrations, and. a section discussing the answers to commonly asked
questions.
According to the criteria listed below and in Attachment "C", your site
has been designated as environmentally sensitive. All environmentally sensitive
sites are automatically enrolled into a State contract program for recovery of
oversight costs. The environmental sensitivity criteria for sites are as follows:
1. Highest historic ground water is within 100 feet of
ground surface, or
2. Nearest surface water in'unlined conveyance is within
75 feet of tank(s), or
3. Nearest agricultural or domestic water.well is within
75 feet of tanks(s), or
4.Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge
area, or
5. Permitting Authority determines possible adverse
environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique
wildlife habitat areas.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight
of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action
plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or
permits. These costs will be recovered by Kern County Environmental Health
under the terms of the State contract described below. This contract ONlY
pertains to costs associated with oversight.
STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides
a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County
oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill
the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract.
The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the
costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your s'ite.
Accordingly, Attachment "D", the will serve as the official notification of
enrollment into the State Contract.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
John'Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
KERN COUNTY
81kerl~ie]d, CA 03301 ~nvir0nmenZalHe~thDepaz~men~ ATTACHMENT "D"
(805) 861-3636
.February 7, 1989
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Leo Black Electric '
3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308.
SUBJECT: Location: 3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Leo Black Electric
PERMIT #: 50119
Dear Mr. Tom Gilbert:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage.Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not respond'in§ to this
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas
the direct and' indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardou~ 6ubatanee Cleanup Fund; and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entlty(ies) have been identified as the party or
'parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the Stat~ Water Resources Control'Board
.. for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies
while overseeing the cleansp gf the'above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon,
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Wendell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Streel, Suite 300
Agency Director Bakerlfleld, CA 93301
(805) 861-3502 .... . .... Telephone (805) 861-363~
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
STEVE McCALLEY ,'"' '-'*
Director RESOURCE ENT AGENCY
February 6, 1990
Curtis Darling, Esq.
Darling, Maclin and Thomson
P. O. Box 2411
Bakersfield, CA 93303
RE: Leo Black Electric
Case #: 050119
Dear Mr. Darling:
In response to your letter of January 10, 1990, and as a result of a meeting
held with WZI, Inc. representatives on January31, 1990 we have reviewed the status
of the Leo Black Electric file.
Our review indicates that the Hydrogeological Investigation Work Plan (HIWP)
submitted November 29, 1988, and supplemented May 10, 1989, has not yet been
implemented. It is possible that our concurrance with the supplemented plan was
never communicated formally to WZI, Inc. Please consider this letter formal
approval.of the plan as amended May 10, 1989 (enclosed).
Yourletter of January 10, 1990, proposes that contaminated soil at the site
be excavated and replaced with clean soil.
While the "dig and haul" technique is acceptable to the Department, you may
wish to weigh the financial impact of its utilization versus other acceptable
methods of soil remediation. A cost analysis may not be possible prior to
completion of the HIWP which will fully delineate the vertical and areal extent of
soil contamination present.
In summary, it is this Department's position that execution of the HIWP is
necessary to develop the data needed to make decisions with regard to closure of
the case. Removal of contaminated soil prior, during or upon completion of the
HIWP in accordance with applicable laws and regulations is an acceptable adjunct
to the HIWP.
Curtis Darling, Esq.
February 6, 1990
Page 2
Please feel free to contact me at the above number should you have questions
or wish to discuss the case further.
Si n c~'rel ~,
C~l~ris Burger, R~.H.S?
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Manager Hazardous Materials Management Program
CB~cas
Enclosures
cci M.J. Wilson, WZI
\050119.1tr
Agency Olreclor B.kerlfleld. CA 93301
· Telephone (805) 861-3636
(805) 8~1.3SQ2 ..... -~<..:.. Telecopler (805) 861-3429
STEVE McCAL~.EY
Director R E S O U R C E ~;*~:~*'~*~~:'E N T A G E N C Y
DEP ART~,~MENT,. AL
January 2, 1990
Mr. Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Subject: Underground Tank Site Assessment
390g Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA
Permit No. 05001g
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for
work required at the property described above. As a responsible party for a
leaking underground storage tankr you have previously received a letter from this
Department notifying you of the required work necessary to identify the extent of
the contamination. A review of our records indicates that the hydrogeologic
investigation workplan prepared by WZl~as approved by this DeDartment. However,
the workplan has not been implemented.
Pursuant to Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and Chapter
8.48 of the Kern County Ordinance Code, the Kern County Environmental Health
Services Department requires a determination of the threat to the environment.
Accordingly, the work must be initiated by February 5, 1990.
Prior to initiating work, please contact this office so that a convenient
time can be arranged for a representative from this Department to witness/inspect
site activities.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at {805)
861-3636.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Hateria]s Specialist
Hazardous Haterlals Hanagement Program
DG:cas
\gilbert.ltr
WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD
-DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT
CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: S SUBSTANCE:
SITE NO: 050119 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y
SITE NAME: LEO BLACK ELECTRIC DATE REPORTED: 08/05/8?
ADDRESS: 400 McKITTRIGK HWY DATE CONFIRMED: 08/05/8?
CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 98808 CATEGORY: R
SITE STATUS
CASE TYPE: G CONTRACT STATUS 5 EMERGENCY
RESPONSE:
RP SEARCH: S DATE UNDERWAY: '03/05/87 DATE COMPLETED: 03/05/8?
PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: O~ DATE COMPLETED: 08/04/8?
ASSESSMENT:
REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: 12/02/88 DATE COMPLETED: / /
INVESTIGATION: U
REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: / / DATE COMPLETED: / /
POST REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
ACTION MONITORING
ENFORCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN:
TAKEN:
RAP REQUIRED: DATE APPROVED:
CASE CLOSED: DATE CLOSED: / /
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN:
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
CONTACT NAME: TOM GILBERT SPECIALIST: 9
COMPANY NAME: LEO BLACK ELECTRIC SENSITIVITY: EES
ADDRESS: 2000 JULIAN AVENUE VERIFIED (X)
CITY/STATE: BAKERSFIELD, GA 93304 DATE OF REPORT: 12/19/89
4800 EASTON DR., SUITE 114
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309
FAX NO. 805-326-0191
FAX LEAD SHEET
....... .. _ ........ SENDER'S INITIALS ~
CONFIRMING PHONE NO, $05-326-1112
8PEOIAL INSTRUOTIONS (IF ANY) ' ~ "
,, ~ ~la#ersflel~t. C.titorni~ $3300
805.32G.~12
May 8, ~989
Amy E. Green
Kern County Health Department
Environmental Division
2700 M Street, Suite 300 ,.
Bakersfield, California 93~31
Re: January 10, 1989 Review of Hydrogeologicel Investigation Workplan for Leo
Black Electric, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Green:
Per your reqUest, the correspondence of January 10, 1989 from you addressed to Tom
Gilbert regarding the Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan submitted for Leo Black
Electric located at 3909 Pierce 'Road in Bakersfield, California is enclosed for your
reference. As .we discussed, a second review of the Workplan was sent to Tom Gilbert
Mr. Gilbert requests that he not be charged for the review associated with the April 6,
1989 correspondence because it duplicates work performed for the .January 10, 1989
correspondence.
A letter responding to your requests aonceming the workp!an and a modified plot plan
will be sent to you shortly.
Very truly yours,
Laura M. Bezels
Manager, Geology
LMB/mw
Encl.
0206.30051.001
" COUNTY HEALTH
l?00 M It~"ft HIAI,?H OPPICI#
M~lliq M~; DI~ECTO~ OP INVt~ONM~NTA~ HEALTH
,' , 141l TruKtun A~S VMHfl I. R~tchl~d
1989
Tom
2000 3ul~an Ava.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Re: Hydrogeologtcal Investigation Workplan submitted for Leo Black
Electric, 3909 Pierce Rd. In Bakersfield, CA
Dea~ Mr. G~lbe~t:
The hydrogeological Investigation workplan prepared for
Black Electric, 3909 Pie=ce Rd. in B&ke~e~leld, Oa~iforn~a was
received and reviewed by a rep~esenta~ive of thee department. The
info~mation, p~ovided within the p~oposed workplan ~$ summarized
1. Depth to groundwater was estimated as being between
to 20 feat below the g~ounds surface. (fo~ ~he first
unconfined aquifer)
2. I~forma~on was obtained from Ke~n County ~ate= Agency
~e~3s nea~ the s~te, a~d ~he ~adien~ was estimated as
d~pp~ng approximately 3 degrees NW.
3. WZI proposed ins~alla~on of 4-~ bo~ng$, a~ound ~he ~ank
excava~ion. The borings were ~dent~ied as LBS-i,
2, LBS-3, LBS-4, LB$-~ attd LB~-6. They we=e
in locations which ass~t ~n defining the late=al
of ~he contaminant in soil. $~1 samples are to be
re~rieved at 5 foot intervals. The sample9 will be aen~
to BO Labs, and analyzed for BTX.
4. WZI proposed to conve~t L85-1, L85-$ ~$3 o~ ~BS5
mo~ttoring wells if the boreho~e ts rela~tvely clean, a~d
if the gradient appears to be ae believed.
The following concerns must be add,'es=ed be~o~e ~he workplan
may be implemen~ed.
The workplan mus~
You~ me~hod fo~ determining any Ver~*lcal
of the contmm~na~ton ~n g~oundwate~.
--.,, Tom
Page
The minimum sampl~l~g ~nterval must be p~ovtd~d ~
t~ differs from the 5~ specified.
The m~ntmum analysis on so~l and wa~e~ sample~ mus~
also include otl and grease (since
components were de~ec~ed a~ this si~e durin~
All b~ring~ which do no~ ex~end down ~o ~he
saturated zone, and bays no no~tc~abl~ con~amina~lon
muo% be Oea~ed w/th c~men~ from 5' ~o grade. The
remaAnder o~ ~he borAng ca~ be filled wi2h clean
cuttings.
If ~he s~tu~ated zone Is encountered, o~ you
anticipate drilling to ~he saturated zone ~ p~rmi=
for a ~es~hole or moni%ortng well mus~ be obtained -
the permit ~hould be ob=ained tn advance, and a
~ep~esenta~tve o~ the Kern County Hoallh Depa~tmen~
mu8~ be onsi~e when the well or ~est hole ts.sealet.
All con,amino,ed borings mus~ be sealed wl~h cement
as specified tn ~he workplan. :.
A well mue% be tns~llled ~o confirm =he'p~eaence of
groundwater con~amin~tto~ near ~he tatlk excavation.
This ~ell mus~ be drilled, in the a'~ea where high
levels .of contamination were de~ec~ed, or a~
mos~ 10 fee~ away from that at, es, ~o provide an idea
of the hlghes~ levels encountered.
LBS-3 mus~ be conve=ted tn~o a moni%oring well or
a new well must be drilled nea~ the tank excava~ion.
All sampling procedures for monttorin~ walls must
be specified wi~hin ~he repor~ - ex, Bailing ~he
well a minimum of 3-5 ~ell vol. ~hen re~rievlng a
sample. The wate~ mus~ be held on site un~tl
analytical results a~e obtained.
3&nG&~¥ 10, 1989
p=ge 3
66~-3636,
Env~onm &l ~eal~-~JPec
~z&~dous' ~er~als M~nagemen~
1-10-89
, 4800 Easton Drive~e 114
~ Ba kef sfield' Cali'~11~93309 ~ ['~
Bakersfield, California 93389
oos~326-.,2 M~Y 0 q lq~9
May 8, 1989
WZl ,~.,,: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Amy E. Green
Kern County Health Department
Environmental Division
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: January 10, 1989 Review of Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan for Leo
Black Electric, 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Green:
Per your request, the correspondence of January 10, 1989 from you addressed to Tom
Gilbert regarding the Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan submitted for Leo Black
Electric located at 3909 Pierce Road in Bakersfield, California is enclosed for your
reference. As we discussed, a second review of the Workplan was sent to Tom Gilbert
on April 6, 1989.
Mr. Gilbert requests that he not be charged for the review associated with the April 6,
1989 correspondence because it duplicates work performed for the January 10, 1989
corres .F)ondence.
A letter responding to your requests concerning the workplan and a modified plot plan
will be sent to you shortly.
Very truly yours,
Laura M. Bazeley, R.G.
Manager, Geology
LMB/mw
Encl.
0206.30051.001
KERN COUNTY
~700 "H' Streec. See. 300 dli~v
'.;ake,sf~ld, CA 93301 .... ironmefl~l He~ Se~ices Del
.. (805) 861-3636
April 6, 1989
Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Re: Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan for Leo Black Electric,
3909 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan prepared for Leo Black Electric, 3909
Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, California was received and reviewed by a representative of this
Department. The workplan provided the following information and approach proposed
to investigate the site:
1. Depth to water was estimated as being 15 to 20 feet below ground surface.
The gradient was estimated as being northwest, based on information
obtained from eight wells in the vicinity of the site.
2. Wilson Zublin proposed to drill 4 to 6 borings around the site to obtain
information on the extent of contamination in soil and groundwater. An
estimate of the gasoline plume in the soil above the water table was
provided from the 1987 investigation. There was evidence of a heavy
hydrocarbon plume, which has not been defined. The proposed borings
(LBS-l, LBS-2, LBS-3, and LBS-4) were placed in areas outside of the
postulated groundwater contamination plume. Borings were not proposed
within the old tank excavation area. All borings will be drilled beyond the
15 foot depth, so will have a high probability of impacting groundwater.
Borings LBS-1 and LBS-3 will be converted into groundwater monitoring
wells. Water samples will be retrieved from all borings.
3. Two borings were proposed as akematives. LBS-5 is proposed southwest
of LBS-2 and will be used if LBS-2 has high levels of soil contamination.
LBS6 is proposed in an area northwest of LBS-4 and will be used if LBS-4
has high levels of soil contamination.
Both LBS5 and LBS6 would be converted into groundwater monitoring wells
if utilized.
The following concerns must be addressed before the workplan may be urillzed to
assess the site:
1. A groundwater monitoring well permit must be obtained from Kern Gounty
Environmental Health Staff for all borings which will be converted into
monitoring wells. The permits must be obtained before the wells are drilled.
2. A test hole permit must be obtained from Kern Gounty Environmental
Health Staff for all borings which will be drilled to groundwater that are
not converted into monitoring wells. The permits must be obtained before
any test holes are drilled.
3. Water samples retrieved from wells which are properly developed are more
representative of'the aquifer. The quality of samples retrieved from test
holes are questionable, unless the contractor is simply looking for floating
product.
4. There are no wells proposed within the old tank excavation area. At least
one well should be installed in this area - since groundwater quality in this
area will be compared to groundwater quality in all other wells installed.
A revised plot plan, considering the tank excavation area must be submitted
before the workplan is approved.
5. All testholes and wells must be sealed with a sand cement or neat cement
mixture and an Environmental Health inspector must be onsite when the
cement is mixed and poured into the well annular space or test hole.
6. PVC screens were proposed for all monitoring wells. All wells constructed
with PVC screens in contaminated zones will be permitted as temporary
wells needing to be abandoned at the end of a two year period.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636.
re y,
Environme~rf_ _~al Heal. th_ _ e~alist II~
Hazardous ~l~aterials Ma~a~rogram
AG:dr
amykgilbert.ltr
cc: W.Z.I.
KERN COUNTY
27,00 '~' Street, Ste. ~00
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Environmenta/ Health Depa_~ment
(805) 861-3636
February 16, 1989
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Leo Black Electric
2000 Julian Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
SUBJECT: Location: 3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Known As: Leo Black Electric
PERMIT #: 050119
Dear Mr. Tom Gilbert:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described
above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the'site of
an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank.
This notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a
responsible party for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating
to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities.
.California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code
Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result
of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE
CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED.
Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states 'the minimum
required site workplan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting
environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms,
example illustrations, and a section discussing the answers to commonly asked
questions.
According to the criteria listed below and in Attachment "C", your site
has been designated as environmentally sensitive. All environmentally sensitive
sites are automatically enrolled into a State contract program for recovery of
oversight costs. The environmental sensitivity criteria for sites are as follows:
1.Highest historic ground water is within 100 feet of
ground surface, or
2. Nearest surface water in unlined conveyance ts within
75 feet of tank(s), or
3. Nearest agricultural or domestic water well is within
75 feet of tanks(s}, or
4. Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge
area, or .
5. Permitting Authority determines possible adverse
environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique
wildlife habitat areas.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight
of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action
plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring ts not covered by any fees or
permits. These costs will be recovered by Kern County Environmental Health
under the terms of the State contract described below..This contract ONLY
pertains to costs associated with oversight.
STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides
a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County
oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill
the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract.
The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the
costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
Accordingly, Attachment "D", the will serve as the official notification of
enrollment Into the State Contract.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
KERN COUNTY
2700 ';q' Street. Ste. 300
8a'l~ersfield. CA 93301 EnvLcon~enta~ HeBJth Depaz~c~ent
(805) 861-3636 ATTACHMENT "D"
February 16, 1989
Mr. Tom Gilbert
Leo Black Electric
2000 Julian Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
SUBJECT: Location: 3909 Pierce Rd.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Known As: Leo Black Electric
PERMIT #: 050119
Dear Mr. Tom Gilbert:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has apprcnri~ted funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks: and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, In whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for Investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local'agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon.
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Adminis'trative Officer
Environmental Health
W; RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
S£~3~-[ OF WA~'--R OUAL/.TY
._ UST CLEANUP PROG~
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY R~PORT
CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: L SUBSTANCE:
SITE NO: d~O//'~ 'FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y'
DATE
CITY/ZIP
· " .. SITE STATUS
CASE T~E: U CONTACT STATUS: 2 EMERGENCY
RESPONSE:
~ SEARCH: ~ DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
ASSESSMENT
REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: .DATE COMPLETED:
I~ESTIGATION
REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
POST REMEDIAL DATE U~ERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
ACTION MONITORING
ENFORCEMENT ACTION' TYPE: DATE TAKEN:
TAKEN
~p REQUIRED : DATE APPROV~D:
CASE CLOSED: DATE CLOSED: .."
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: REMEDIAL ACTIONS T~EN:
' · RESPONSIBLE P~TY
..- P 767·~ 72~6 .440
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED' MAIL·
'h0 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
~, NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
'. '.~"".'? .~, .... ":,? .i,~ .'- ............ ~ .... . - ':'-. ":,~'-.:.':~-,.~,'~ .,,'~ ..-i=',:~i.~L~.:~;::~'.~i?:'..~:,..,,~ :.,.
:.,:'.?~,,~=.,~;.~.
' '' '.': ~.~-~,..:...'~:. ' .' .... ~?~',":,::'. ~';~.'.4~:;'~:~:~:,;~,~?~.~.~'~,~ ':."~ii':~ ~i"!~:?~.J!~,~!~<.<.'.:,~' "?:!'~'~'.~'~'~;i;~;,~'~'~!~:~'~,~''''''''' ::' ~?i Postage S
~'~!~.?~;'~.~:~~ ...... ~. :..: ........ Certified Fee
'::" '"'"'"~;"~:'":~. ....... '~' ,";~'~,'~',: .......... ':'~~ Special Delivery Fee
. . . .: ,?"-"':". ~ ~-~~:::~
· Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
i Return Receipt showing to whom,
Date, and Address of Delivery
TOTAL Postage and Fees $
Postmark or Date
K;RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME~IT.
' ' ..... ( e HEALTH OFFICER
2700.M StrN~ (~ Leon M Hebertlon, M.D.
Blkerifield, California ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Mailing Addre~: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard
B~kerdield, Celifm'nie 93301
(805) 861-3636
January 10, 1989
Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Re: Hydrogeological Investigation Workplan submitted for Leo Black.
Electric, 3909 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, CA.
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The hydrogeolOgical Investigation Workplan prepared for Leo
Black Electric, 3909 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, CalifOrnia was
received and reviewed by a representative of this department. The
information provided within the proposed workplan is summarized
below:
1. Depth to groundwater was estimated as being between 15
to 20 feet below the grounds surface. (for the first
unconfined aquifer)
2. Information was obtained from Kern County Water Agency.
Wells near the site, and the gradient was estimated as
dipping approximately 3 degrees'NW.
3. WZI proposed installation of 4-6 borings, around the tank
excavation. The borings were identified as LBS-l, LBS-
2, LBS-3, LBS-4, LBS-5 and LBS-6. They were positioned.
in locations which assist in defining the lateral spread
of the contaminant in soil. Soil samples are to be
retrieved at § foot intervals. The samples will be sent
to BC Labs, and analyzed for BTX.
4. WZI proposed to convert LBS-i, LBS-6 LPS3 or LBS5 into
monitoring wells if the borehole is relatively clean, and
if the gradient appears to be as believed.
The following concerns must be addressed before the workplan
may be implemented~
The workplan must specify:
1. Your method for determining any vertical migration
of the contamination in groundwater.
DISTRICT OFFICES
Delano . Lamont . Lake Ilabelle . M(~tave . Rlrlaecre~! . .qhAfter T~fl
Tom Gilbert
January 10, 1989
Page 2
2. The minimum sampling interval must be provided if
it differs from the 5' specified.
3. The minimum analysis on soil and water samples must
also include oil and. grease (since heavier
components were detected at this site during the
initial investigation.)
4. Ail borings which do not extend down to the
saturated zone, and have no noticeable contaminatiol%
must be sealed with cement from 5' to grade. The
remainder of the boring can be filled with clean
cuttings.
5. If the saturated zone is encountered, or you
anticipate drilling to the saturated zone a permit
fo~ a testhole or monitoring well must be obtained -
the permit should be obtained in advance, and a
representative of the Kern County Health DePartment
must be onsite when the well or test hole is sealed.
6. All contaminated borings must be sealed with cement
as specified in the'workplan.
7. A .well must be installed to confirm the presence of
'groundwater contamination near the tank excavation.
This well must be drilled, in the area where high
levels of contamination were detected, or at the
most 10 feet away from that area, to provide an idea
of the highest levels encountered.
LBS-3 must be converted into a monitoring well or
a new well must be drilled near the tank excavation.
8. All sampling procedures for monitoring wells must
be specified within the report - ex. Bailing the
well a minimum of 3-5 well vol. then retrieving a
sample. The water must be held on site until
analytical results are obtained.
Tom Gilbert
January 10, 1989
Page 3
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (805)
861-3636.
Sincerely,
Envlronm~.~~21Health-'S~pectalist
Hazardous' Materials Management Program
AEG:dr
1-10-89
staff.haz\gtlbert.ltr
4800 Easton Ori~..~uite 114 ~ E~
Bakersfield, Cali~093309
Bakersfield, California 93389
DEC 0 1
WZl ,~; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
November 29, 1988
Ms. Amy Green
Environmental Health Division
Kern County Health Department
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Leo Black Electric
Site Characterization
Proposal Work Plan
Dear Ms. Green:
Attached is the Proposed Work Plan for the hydrogeological
characterization on the property of Leo Black Electric, located at
3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. This plan was required
by your correspondence dated June 27, 1988 and November 18, 1988.
If additional information is required for approval, please contact
Laura Bazeley or me at WZI Inc. at the address above.
Sincerely,
Susan Chandler Kiser
V.P., Operations
SCK:DJC:df
Enclosures
30051
,. 4800 Easton Dri~t~',dte 114
~., ~* Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
805/326-1112
Hydrogeological Investigation Work Plan
for
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
3090 Pierce Road
Bakersfield, California
Prepared For:
Kern County Health Department
by
Susan Chandler Kiser
Registered Geologist~
State of California No. 3831
Expiration Date: 6/30/90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paqe
Introduction 1
Previous Work 1
Hydrogeologic Setting 2
Drilling Program 2
Groundwater Monitoring Wells 3
Sampling, Handling and Collection Methodology 3
Water Sampling Program 5
Lithology and Plume Delineation 5
Health and Safety 5
References Cited 7
TABLES
Table
Soil Boring and Monitoring Well Rationale 1
EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
Location Map 1
Depth to Groundwater - Unconfined Aquifer 2
Water Gradient Map Series 3
Well Location Map 4
Groundwater Monitoring Well Design 5
APPENDICES
Appendix No.
LUFT Soil and Water Sampling Methodology
Introduction
This work plan responds to a request by the Kern County Health
Department (KCHD) for an assessment of the soil and possible
groundwater contamination on the Leo Black Electric property,
located at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California, Section 23,
T.29S., R.27E., MDB & M (Exhibit 1).
The proposed work will address the following specific issues
required 'by the letter dated June 27, 1988, from Amy Green,
Environmental Health Specialist for the KCHD:
1. Is there soil and/or groundwater contamination present
north of the former underground tank site?
2. What is the extent of groundwater contamination, if
any, created by this site?
3. What is the lateral and vertical extent of the possible
groundwater contamination plume?
4. What is the probable extent and source of heavy
hydrocarbon contamination on the site?
Previous Work
A site assessment of the property (plan approved by the KCHD June
23, 1987) was conducted by Wilson Zublin, Inc. (WZI Inc) in July,
1987. Soil samples from five auger boreholes near the
underground tank site identified a BTEX (gasoline) plume and a
concentration of heavy hydrocarbons in soil down to a depth of
approximately 15 feet. No groundwater investigation was
conducted at that time. Complete documentation of this site
assessment was presented in the final report by WZI Inc,
submitted to the Kern County Health Department in July, 1987.
Hydrogeoloqic Setting
The water table beneath the site is between 15 to 20 feet below
surface (Exhibit No. 2). Previous sample borings by WZI Inc on
site penetrated 15 feet of fine to medium-grained sand and then
encountered moist soil which is compatible with the regional
setting.
he water table gradient is believed to be to the northwest.
his is based on past water level histories of eight Kern County
~Water Agency wells within the Improvement District No. 4, and
located within a one-half mile radius of the site. Water depth
~measurements taken during the fall months for the years 1975,
1979, 1982, and 1987 consistently show a gradient dipping
~approximately 3°NW (Exhibit No. 3).
~---~Drilling Program
_. ~The present work plan utilizes all the data Collected in the
~~.~previous site 'assessment as a basis from which to-begin the
~%~.~~groundwater and additional Soil con~amin~tiln studyI
The propo.sed sampling program is tallore t addres the specific
deficiencies noted by the Kern County Health Department and at
...
the same time designed to accommodate a study to minimize the
.
number of samples required to delineate the extent of
.~ ~contamination. The proposed borehole locations are identified on
' ~ - - ~ ~Exhlblt No. 4 as LBS1, LBS2, and so on. Rationale for each of
the borehole locations and the sampling intervals is summarized
in Table. No. 1.
The approved work plan must be flexible to allow for on-site
decisions regarding choice of borehole location. Note that
Exhibit No. 4 shows two alternate interpretations of the current
data. One is a best fit model mapped as solid contours showing
the possible extent of the plume most easily adapted to the
~current data. 'A second model reflects the influence of
a
~northwestern groundwater gradient showing the postulated limit of
~ ~contamination as a dash line. The first three soil borings of
~ ~~~ this work plan should establish a sit~ specific groundwater
gradient on the property and thus gui e in the selection of
alternate borings to most effectively delineate the contamination
plume.
Groundwater Monitorinq Wells
· ~Interpretation of the previous WZI Inc site assessment report
~suggests the possibility of gasoline contamination in the ~
~groundwater .underneath the tank site, therefore a groundwater ~_~?~6%
onitoring program to monitor the extent of groundwater.
~3-contamin~tion, will be emplaced subsequent to the delineation of
he a~gal ~xtent 9.f~ontamination.
e groun wa er gra ien irec ion will dictate placement of
_~these wells. Three monitoring wells are anticipated. The
~~location of the monitoring wells will be made according to water
level measurements the day the borings are made. One to be
~~located in the up-gradie?t direction, on~ ~n the down-gradient
%W~l~irection and the third ~n a lateral pos~t~on so as to monitor
~~c_~g~s in the groundwater gradient. Boreholes~ LBS-6__~,
~'~~PS-3 or~5 are the monitoring well locations should the ground
~~er gradient be as shown on Exhibit No. 3 and borehole samples
~~indicate these locations are relatively free of contamination.
Water samples from all the proposed boreholes will also provide
~~, iinf°rmati°n °n the lateral and vertical extent °f any possible · plume emanating from the former underground tank site.
Sampling, Handling and Collection Methodoloqy
The monitoring well completion schematic is presented in Exhibit
No. 5. This design reflects the construction~ and completion
recommendations of the California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Field Manual.
Boring will be done by 6 1/2" hollow-stem auger and will be .~,~
drilled approximating the order presented on Table No. 1 to
minimize cross-contamination from the auger to the soil samples.
Sampling will be accomplished by use of either a 1 3/8" or a 2
3/8" split spoon sampler fitted with three brass tubes.
Sampling equipment will be prepared for use each time by washing
with non-phosphate detergent and rinsed with acetone.
Borings LBS-2, LBS-3, and LBS-5 will be drilled to the top of the ~_~
)ground water table while the remaining wells will penetrate to a ~.2~
depth of 30 feet. ~ng ~int~rvals is p~op~d for every 5.~.
!eet, However, on-site inspection of c,,tt~nqs, as they a~e
from the boreholes, may identify litholoqic chanqes or
noticeable changes in contamination that would re~ ~
)ecialized sampling program_~_ Bulk samples will be retained in
labeled plastic bags for future reference. The sampling
intervals summarized in Table No. 1 should be considered a
Upon collection, the cored soil sample will be prepared as
lows:
1. Ail three tubes will be capped with plastic, secured
with plastic tape, and labeled with indelible ink.
2. The most representative sample will be stored on ice
until taken by BO Laboratory personnel, with Chain of~Q~f~.~ ~
Custody documents, for laboratory analysis.~ ~ ~~~\~ ~. ~,~.%~~.~
4 '~~ ·
3. The remaining two capped tubes from each sample
interval will be preserved on ice as back-up samples.
Excess cuttings from the boring will be placed in approved
containers and disposed of at an approved facility such as
Petroleum Waste, Inc. with the appropriate Chain of Custody
documents in the event of contamination.- Otherwise
uncontaminated cutting w~ll be used to backfill the borehole.
Core samples will b analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene (BTX)
analyses, as recommended by the Kern County Health Department.
B. C. Laboratories is a certified hazardous waste laboratory that
routinely collects and analyzes soil samples associated with
underground tank removal. The holding time for samples shall not
exceed fourteen (14) days and most likely will be analyzed within
48 hours.
Water Sampling Proqram
Ail water sampling will be collected according to guidelines
outlined in the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field (LUFT) Manual
(1987), attached in this workplan in Appendix I.
The rig will be equipped with a bailer in the event that the
water table is reached. The groundwater samples will be
collected in a sterile container and then be ~tested for BTX
contamination.
All groundwater hole~ w~%_l Re aband°rked by filling with concrete
i elegy an Plume Delifieation
Upon completion of the sampling program, lithologic logs of each
borehole will be prepared. Cross-sections will be constructed to
allow review of the lab analyses of the samples Within the
5
penetrated hydrogeologic framework. Maps which graphically
depict the limits of the plume will be prepared. The Kern County
Health Department guidelines for the edge of the gasoline
contamination are (1) a significant drop in contamination level
or (2) contamination completely disappears.
Health and Safety
WZI Inc. personnel will implement a series of procedures in order
to maintain a safe and healthy working environment during .this
field investigation. All subcontractors on the site will also
comply with WZI Inc.'s health and safety procedures. The
following protective gear will be available on site in the event
that air monitoring equipment (HNU-PID) indicates the presence of
benzene, toluene, or xylene in concentration greater than
permissible exposure levels of 1 ppm, 200 ppm, and 100 ppm
respectively, for eight (8) hour time weighted averages (29 CFR
1910.1000, air contamination).
- Twin-cartridge respirators (half-mask)
- Chemically resistant gloves and clothing
- Safety glasses
In addition, hard hats and chemically resistant .steel-toed boots
will be required for WZI Inc. personnel on location. A list of
emergency response personnel and addresses will be constructed
identifying nearby fire stations, hospitals, and police stations.
It is WZI policy to evaluate and re-evaluate site conditions
throughout the operation to maintain a safe and healthy working
environment and make modifications to the above health/safety
outline when necessary.
6
References Cited
Kern County Water Agency, 1987, Report on Water Conditions,
Improvement District No. 4.
State of California, Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Task Force,
1987, Leaking Underground fuel Tank (LUFT) Field Manual:
Guidelines for site assessment, cleanup, and underground
storage tank closure. 101 p.
Wilson Zublin, Inc., May 1987, Leo Black Electric, Site
Characterization Proposed Workplan, Prepared fOr Estate of
Leo Black in response to Kern County Health Request (Dated
March 6).
Wilson Zublin, Inc., July 1987, Leo Black Electric Site
Characterization. Report prepared for Estate of Leo Black.
7
TABLE 1
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
BOREHOLE LOCATION AND RATIONALE
BOREHOLE
NO. LOCATION DEPTH RATION ALE
LBS-l* 17' southeast of former underground tank site 15'+ To further delineate the updip edge of heavy
~ hydrocarbon contamination in soil and install
moj3itoring well
LBS-2 16' southwest of the tank site 15'+ To constrain the southwestern boundary of soil
contamination, both light and heavy hydrocarbon
LBS-3* 10' northeast o! tank site 15'+ To further delineate the northern boundary of light
and heavy hydrocarbon contamination in soil
LBS-4 24' northeast from former underground tank site 15'+ To delineate the downdip edge of hydrocarbon
~ soil contamination
LBS-5* 25' southwest of former underground tank site 15'+ In the event LBS-2 has high levels of
alternate soil contamination
LBS-6* 35' northwest of former underground tank site 15'+ In the event LBS-4 has high levels of
alternate soil contamination
*POSSIBLE MONITOR HOLES ~ \
, ,. Primary Sch
! ' -~..
· BM ":'~ ~
,:.'-'2.~ ~°o /:' ~ ...
" " 'Beardslt ~'
"
"' o~, , ',
........ Il' ~ ~ 99
........ SITE LO~ATIOH
.."0 ~
0 O .~ 0 ':' O, , ~all Park
.:# o ~ ~ o "~:'/""'~'"~:':'"'~' ~ ~ '
" o U o " o I I ~o I -'
22 t ~ '* /
L.~ ~ ..o o:. z.
o o //,~."
"1 I ~' ~ ;'
*~ ~: u~ ·
o o ~ - ~( '~
Lan(lc~
.. .' .. ~
o
mire 2~ '~x 99',
X .
. / -
/'-~....~ ,~-
/, ~- ....... ~ ./ II1~
FIELD .'/'
, .Z ...... L
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
HYDROGEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
30DO PI~RC~ ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
L~AT~.N
0 2000'
~ V~ ~G ~RSFI~, CA
FE~T DA~ 8/8~ ~HIBIT 1
n~
SITE LOCATION
I1% ,Il DEP~ TO GROUNDWATER II
SOURCE KERN COUN~W I I ~11 UNCONFINED AQUIFER I~
: ATER AGENCY, 1~7, I~l ' ~!
REPORT ON WATER CONDITIONS, ~ I ~11NC ~RSFIE~, CA
I
I
DN 979
, R50/~284
R50~'307 /''
SEC. 23 T29S/R27E - 1982 SEC. 23 T29S/R27E - 1987
LEGEND LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
WELL LOCATION W/WELL NAME
--~ WATER GRADIENT MAP SERIES
SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER
ELEVATK) NS
KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY
2000' WZI INC BAKERSFIELD. CA
I DATE 9/88 EXHIBIT 3
DN 980
LBS-6 ° ( ~
Boring Bo~.~.- %~,~, "'"'-.....
(Alternate) L
Boring ",
/ \
/ ~ " ~
/ ~' B'- PLAN ~n ,~ ..< ~:,
o,
/ x VIEW
I "" FO:RM~cF{ LOCAT;O'N CF o )- / ' -'
I '" JNDERGROUND TANX <
LB$-~
*~
~ Boring FENCE
ASPHALT
A ( s2s3 .LBS-5 (None Doted:ted) IA'
'i~' LB 6 LB 3 Borin0 ~ ~ , ~ ,
/
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS
ESTIMATED EXTENTOF x ~N FEET BELOW GROUND
SOIL CONTAMINATION BASED. ~.~ ti (ug/g) o
ON 7/87 SOIL SAMPLING ~ . 400 ?~
AND G~DIENT X ~ xxL ~ ~91 , (Non~ D.,.:J.di.
0 x LBS,-1 SCALE m FEET -.-
o X ' B~i'ng I ~ i
,LBS-5
~13 FE~ BELOW 0 5 10 ~
Alternate~ - 0 GROUND
'" A I L~ ~ LB ~ ~ ~su~ce ! A'
UNDERGR~ND TAN~ ~ HYDROgeN O~R
~ -' ] TOTAL VOLATILE
J HYDROCARBONS
J 0 (ug/g)
0 5
~ MAPS and CROSS SEC~ONS
............................................. .... ~2~ ~,~.~[ ..... ~F~.~___~__._
pI~PTH
GROUND SURFACE SLOPES AWAY
IN FEET ~/FROM WELL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE
CEMENT
CASING, 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC
5
-3' BENTONITE SEAL
SAND* PACK 24" ABOVE
TOP OF WELL SCREEN
10
NTERIOR/EXTERIOR FLUSH
'- THREADED COUPLING
15 ~ WATER TABLE (JULY 1987)
2O SAND PACK*
4" SLOTTED PVC PIPE*
~11" DIAMETER BOREHOLE
25
· . CAP
3 0 BENTONITE SEAL
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
*NOTE: SLOT AND SAND SIZE TO GROUNDWATER MONITORING
BE DETERMINED DURING WELL DESIGN
DRILLING OF THE WELL.
WZI INC. BAKERSFIELD, CA
DATE 8 / 8 8 EXHIBIT 5
" Appendix I '-
From Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field
Manual : Appendix B
SAMPLE COLLECTION, TRANSPORT, AND LABOR~TORY ANALYSES
A. Sample Collection
1. Field Notebook
The field £nvestigator should keep a field notebook (preferably
bound with pages numbered) to record sample collection proce-
dures, dates, laboratory identification, sample collection
location, and the name of the sampler. This is important for
later recall or legal challenge.
2. Soil Samples
a. Hydrocarbons: Soil samples collected from a backhoe or from
-..the ground should be collected in a thin-walled stainless
steel or brass cylinder at least three inches long by one
inch in diameter that has been prepared by the laboratory
doing the analysis or the project consultant. .About one
inch of soil should be removed from the immediate surface
area where the sample is to' be taken and the cylinder then
pounded into the soil ~ith a wooden mallet. No headspace
should be present in the cylinder once the sample is col-
lected. When the sample is collected, each end of the
cylinder should be covered with aluminum foil and then
' '."'- ' ' . capped with a polyethylene lid, taped, and labeled. The
sample should then be immediately placed in an ice chest
i'""~''~ ~ containing dry ice~ and kept frozen for delivery to the
' .' laboratory..- Care should be taken throughout to avoid
contamination of both the inside and outside of the. cylinder
and its con.tents (1). '"'
. Samples should be kept frozen at the laboratory until they
.. are analyzed. Holding time should not exceed 14 days from
''. the time of collection. Frozen soil cores should be removed
¥ . from the cylinders.by spot heating the cylinder and immedi-
· -' "~'. ~.~.. ately extruding the sample (or a portion of it) A portion
...... · '~' of the frozen sample should be' removed and prepared for
· i· analysis according to approved EPA methods.
In situations where the above' procedure is inappropriate,
i.e. semi-solid samples, glass vials (properly prepared by
contract laboratory or consultant) with Teflon seal and
screw cap should be used, and maintained at 4°C until
analysis.
b. Organolead: Tetraethyl/tetramethyl-lead are volatile;
therefore, soil samples should be collected in cylinders and
frozen as described for volatile hydrocarbons above.
-54-
'. c. Shi~ g Samples: Vhere commercial ppers are' involved,
dry ice may present Department of Transportation (DOT)
'j shipping problems and "blue ice" may have to be substituted.
3. Vater Samples
a. Free floating product (from a well): Samplin§ of free
floating product on the surface of ground water should not
be performed until the well has been allowed to stabilize
for at least 24 hOurs after development or other withdrawal
procedure. A sample should be collected that is ind£cative
of the thickness of floating product within the monitoring
well. This may be accomplished by the use of a clear,
acrylic bailer designed to collect a liquid sample where
free product and ground water meet. A graduated scale on
the bailer is helpful for determining the thickness of free
product. Samples should b~ field-inspected for the presence
of odor and/or sheen in addition to the above evaluation.
Electronic measuring devices also are available for deter-
mining the thickness of the hydrocarbon layer floating on
ground water ....
b. Dissolved product (from 'a well): If free product is
detected, analysis of water for diss61ved product should be
conducted. Prior to collecting a water sample, a well
should be purged until temperature, conductivity and pH
stabilize. Often, this will requir~ removal of four or more
" . , . *' well volumes by bailing or pumping. Once well volumes are
~ -'." removed and well water is stabilized, a sample can be taken ~.
" after the water level approaches 80 percent of i~s initial · '-
.. '.' " level. Where water' level recovery is slow,-the sample can ' '
· ~ be collected after stabilization is achieved.
Ground water samples should be collected in a manner which
reduces or eliminates the possibility of loss of volatile
constituents from the sample. For collecting samples, a
gas-actuated positive displacement pump or a submersible
,. pump is preferred. A Teflon or stainless steel bailer is
· .. acceptable Peristaltic pumps or airlift pumps should not
· .. be used.
Cross-contamination from transferring pumps (or bailers)
from well to well can'-occur and should be avoided by thor-
ough cleaning between sampling episodes. Dedicated (i.e.,
permanent installation), well pumps, while expensive, are
often cost effective in the long term and ensure data
reliability relative to cross-contamination. If transfer of
equipment is necessary, sampling should proceed from the
least contaminated to the most contaminated well, if the
latter information is available before sample collection.
Vater samples should be collected in vials or containers
specifically designed to prevent loss of volatile constitu-
ents from the sample. These vials should be provided by an
analytical laboratory,, and preferably, the laboratory
conducting the analysis. No headspace should be present in
the sample container once the container has been capped.
This can be checked by inverting the bottle, once the sample
is collected, and looking for bubbles. Sometimes it is not
possible to collect a sample without air bubbles, particu-
larly if water is'aerated. In these cases, the investigator
should record the problem and account for probable'error.
Cooling samples may also produce headspace (bubbles), but
these will disappear once the sample is warmed for analysis.
Samples should be placed in an ice chest maintained at 4°C
with blue ice (care should be taken to prevent freezing of
the water and bursting of the glass vial). A thermometer
with a protected bulb should be carried in each ice chest.
' c.. Surface water: Grab Samples should be collected in appro-
priate glass containers supplied by the laboratory. The
sample should be collected in such a manner that air bubbles
are not entrapped. Semisolid samples should be collected
the same way. The collected samples should be refrigerated
(blue ice, 4°C) for transport and analyzed within 14 days of
collection.
GUidelines fo andling Samples (Presented in les 3-2 and 3-3)
TABLE 3- 2
REQUIRED CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND
HOLDING TIMES FOR WATER SAMPLES !/
Maximum
Test Container ~/ Preservation Holding Time 3_/
Purgeable aromatic G, Teflon- Cool, 4°C, -Analyze as soon
hydrocarbons (BTX&E) lined septum 0,008% Na2S203 4_/- as possible (max.
Method 8020 or 602 HC1 to pH2 5_/ 14 days)
Total petroleum G : Cool, 4oc Analyze as soon
hydrocarbons as '- 0,008% ~a2S203 4_/ as possible (max.
gasoline - HC1 to pH2 5_/ 14 days) .'
Total petroleum G Cool, 4°C 14 days; analyze
~ydrocarbons -- extract within
diesel fuel oil 40 days
1_/ Modified from 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 136, Guide-
lines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants
~ Under the Clean Uater Act. .,. .....
3_/ Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. %~e
· times listed are the maximum times that samples may be held before
analysis and still be considered valid. Samples may be held for a
longer period only if the collector or laboratory has data on file to
show that the specific types of samples under study are stable for the
longer time. Some samples may-not be s:able for the maximum time
" period given in the table. · ',
" '~ A_f Should only'be used in"the presence of residual chlorine' '
5_/ Sample receiving no pH adjustment must be'analyzed within seven days
of sampling.
TABLE 3- 3
HOLDING TIHE FOR SOIL SAHPLES ~
Analyte Holding Time for Soil
Benzene, toluene, xYlenes Analyze as soon as possible
(maximum 14 days)
Total Petroleum Hydrocar- Analyze as soon as possible
· .... bons, as gasoline (maximum 14 days)
Total Petroleum Hydrocar- Extract within l& days,
bons, as diesel analyze within 40 days
.. 1/ Results from samples not meeting the listed holding times should
be considered minimum values. That is, the actual concentration
is equal to or greater than the concentration determined after
the holding time has expired. ..
C. Recommended Analytical Methods
Recommended analytical procedures are summarized in Table 3-4. The -.._
':~ ' · ' Department of Health Services may approve an alternate method which
.-~ ..."'.. has at least equivalent detection limits, precision, and accuracy as
-~- ' :'~.,:.! . ~.. -. the referenced methods. For example, a cyrogenic gas chromatogra-
.. """....~.......... phy/mass spectrometry (GC/HS)'system may be used instead of a gas
chromatography (GC) system, provided, the GC/MS system can produce .data '.
· '- which are equal or better than data provided by the referenced GC
system in terms of d~tectton limits, precision, and accuracy for an
identical sample matrix.
:. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) arising from gasoline or diesel and
total organic lead can be analyzed by the attached Department of
· " Health Services (DHS) methods. . The investigator should alert the
~'' ~" laboratories to the procedures given in Table 3-4'and supply the
laboratories with copies of the.TPH and total organic lead methods, if
necessary.
TABLE 3-4
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Substance to be Analytical
Analyzed Method Reference
a. Benzene, toluene, xylene, EPA 8020 (soil) 2
ethylbenzene (aromatic
volatile or§chicS) EPA 602 (water) 3,5
b. Total Petroleum DHS (recommended See attached
Hydrocarbons procedure) method
c. Halo§enated volatile EPA 8010 (soil) 2
or§chics, includin§
.: .. 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 601 (water) .. 3,5
..: 'l,2-dichloroethane (£DC)':.
EDB ' DHS extraction
2. Diesel:
a. Total Petroleum DHS (recommended See attached
.. Hydrocarbons . procedure) method
'1 "'- b. Total Recoverable ."~.~ EPA 418.1 ~ 4
" '-' Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~': . .....
' ".3. Or§anolead: '-' "' "!. "DHS "' See attached
: .- DHS method
4. I§nttabtlity:
Flash Point . EPA 1010, 1020 2
..... !/ This is a liquid/liquid extraction procedure for water samples. The
'"~"?'~"' method was developed by DH$ and provides a means for detecting EDB at
... a lower concentration (parts per trillion) than does EPA method 8010
(parts per billion). The procedure was developed to detect EDB in
§round water, as part of the AB 1803 pro§ram.
2_/ This is a relatively quick analytical procedure that measures recover-
able petroleum hydrocarbons, includin§ oil and §tease. It is applic-
able for measurin§ li§ht fuel fractions, but loses approximately half
of any §asoline present (ref. 4). The method costs less than the
recommended procedure and is useful primarily as a survey tool.
Detection Limits for LUFT Investigations
Minimum detection limits for key .analytes are listed in Table 3-5.
The detection limits for benzene, toluene, and xylene are consistent
with the experience of several commercial laboratories under optimal
conditions. The detection lim£ts for Benzene, toluene, and xylene in
soil assume the direct purging of a soil-water mixture and subsequent
gas chromatography -photolonizat£on detection (CC-FID). Lower
detection limits are achievable with available technology by using:
modifications of referenca methods, a larger sample or additional
concentration techniques. Detection limits may be significantly
higher in samples with interfe~ing organics or matrix effects. The
readily obtainable 0.3 ppm detection limit cited on page 20 takes into
account potential sample interferences.
TABLE 3-5 ": -
.... ' DETECTION LIMITS FOR COMMONLY ANALYZED FUEL pRODUCTS
Water Sbtl
.. .:'. Analyte' · ~g/1 pg/kg Method
Benzene 0.3 5 EPA 602, 8020
· · Toluene 0.3 5' EPA 602, 8020
Total Petroleum.. '
Hydrocarbons
D. Recommended DHS Analytical Methods
.'': i~ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Analysis -- Gasoline and Diesel
.::.".".:~.:.a"/";:i:": .... '-. "..:..,.. ":'": " ·
"' ' '"':" 1. Scope and Application· ..: --.:."..:f:.i::::' .. :" .... '
a. This method is for the determination of gasoline and diesel
in contaminated ground water, sludges, and soil.
b. This method is recommended for use by, or under the super-
vision of, analysts experienced in the operation of CC and
in the interpretation of chromatograms.
2. Summary ethod
..~ a. This method involves the determination of volatile hydro-
carbons (gasoline) by the headspace method or the purge and
trap method (EPA method 5030) (2) and :he determ£nation o£
semivolatile organics (diesel) by the extraction method. A
sample, after headspace, purge and trap, or extraction
treatment, is injected into a GC, and compounds in the GC
effluent are detected by an FID. An aliquot of each sample
will be spiked with standards to determine percent recovery
and limits of detection for that sample.
b. The sensitivity of this method usually depends on the level
of interference rather than on instrument limitations.
Table 3-6 lists the limits of detection in the absence of
interferences for water and soil samples.
TABLE 3-6
TPH METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Extraction Headspace
:. Parameter Matrix Method Method
Gasoline Aqueous 0.5 mt/1 5.0 mt/1
Soil 10.0 mt/kg 5.0 mt/kg
3. Interferences
a. Solvents, reagents, glassware, and other sample-processing
. .'. hardware must be demonstrated to be free from interferences
" under the conditions of the analysis by running method
b. Before processing any' samples,' the analyst should demon-
strate daily, through the analysis o~. a solvent blank, that
the entire system is interference-free.
4., Apparatus and Materials
a. Gas-tight syringe: One cubic centimeter (cc) with chromato-
graphic needles·
-61-
5.& Pipet 0.1 ml of 12 solution into the flask and mix for about
one minute.
5.5 Pipet 5 ml of 1% Aliquat 336 in MIBK and mix.
5.6 Dilute to volume with MIBK and mix.
Standard and Blank Preparation
Prepare appropriate working'standards and blank from 100 g/ml Pb
standard.
6.1 Add approximately 20 ml of Xylene to 50 ml volumetric flask.
Pipet the correct amount of the 100 9g/ml Pb standard into
the flask to prepare the right standard.
6.2 Add immediately 0.1 ml of 12 solution and mix well.
6.3 Add 5 ml of 1% Aliquat 336/MIBK and mix well
6.4 Dilute to volume with MIBK and mix well.
6.5 Blank xylene/MIBK (40% xylene) should be treated as =he
working standard solutions.
Analysis ..
7.1 Set up the" AA according to the ~anufacturer s instructions.
~. Use background correction to decrease broad band absorption
7.2Aspirate H20 into the flame and adjust~the acetylene'flow to
8.5 1/min and the air flow to 25 1/min.
7.3' Aspirate MIBK containing 40% xylene into the flame.
7.4 Reduce the acetylene flow to about 4.8 1/min and make fine
adjustments in the acetylene flow to produce an even flame
, with no yellow luminescence to obtain optimum conditions..
7.5 Aspirate into the flame' blank, working standards, and sample
to measure the absorbencies. Estimate the concentrations of
organolead in sample.
Calculations
Solids:
100 m% 50 ml ug/1 x F - ~g/g organolead calculated
50g 20 ml 1000 ml/1 as Pb.
where F - dilution factor.
-68-
E. Quality Assurance A) and Quality Control (qC)
1. Definition
Quality Assurance: Systematic procedures that are used to
provide assurance to a producer or user of information that
defined standards of quality were met. QA covers field and
laboratory performance, i.e., the quality control procedures that
have been followed.
Quality Control: The activities that are used to implement the
quality assurance plan. Quality includes adequacy of the methods
employed, reliability of the results, and cost effectiveness.
2. Chain of Custody
A Chain of Custody Record is the disposition of a sample from
collection to laboratory delivery. A.Chain of Custody Record
should be made out after samples are collected and signed by
individuals collecting, relinquishing, and receiving samples.
See Figure III-4 for an example of a U. S. EPA Chain of Custody
form.
3. Laboratory Certification .-
All soil and water samples should be analyzed by a DHS-certified
laboratory. Two'certtfication programs exist in California and
'" both are administered by DHS. Additional information can be
'~ '"<'- obtained from the addresses listed:
-~'?>~: .... Hazardous Materials Laborator certification Program
'" ?' California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Materials Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way, Room 234
· . Berkeley, CA 94704
(415) 540-3003
'. Drinking Water Laboratory Certification
~'-'~i~..'../'' California Department of Health services
Sanitation and Radiation Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way, Room 465
Berkele~"CA 94704
(415) 540-2201
FiBure 111-4
,&EPA
Aoen~ S~I WA ~101
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
,PROJECT SAMPLERS:
LAB # STATION DATE TIME SAMPLE TYPE ~o.~ REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: t~ RECEIVED BY: n~ DATE/TIME
RELINQUISHED BY: t~ RECEIVED BY: t~ DATE/TIME
RELINQUISHED BY: t~ ~ECEIVED BY: t~ DATE/TIME
RELINQUISHED BY: ~ REC'V'D BY MOBILE ~B FOR FIELD DATE/TIME
DISPATCHED BY: ;s~ DATE/TIME RECEIVED FOR ~B BY: t~,~ DATE/TIME
M~HOD OF SHIPMENT:
J~lts,l~lm: Ot~h4f--ACCOml:~hy Sh,prf'~nl
One Cctv- SurYey Co~'d~n~lo~ F,~ld F;lel
U.S. EPA Chain of Custody Form
4. OA Project Plan: This is a plan that lines objectives,
operational procedures, and the means for assuring how data of
known and acceptable quality can be obtained. WI,ere major
projects are involved tn remedial action, a plan for a perform-
ance audit (field and laboratory operations) a~d corrective
action may be needed.
5. Number o.f Samples to Collect: The number of samples required
relates directly to project objectives and the level of data
reliability desired. The following are minimal recommendations
and do not ensure that representative or statistically valid
sampling of a site has bee~ achieved.
Soil -- Tank excavation hole: At least two samples col-
lected immediately after the tank is removed. This number ..
should be increased for more accurate representation in very
large excavations.
Soil background: Average of three samples.
Soil: Where >10 samples are to be collected at the same
site, five percent duplicates should be collected and
.. analyzed.
~ater: Volatile organic analysis (VOA): All VOA samples
should be collected in duplicate and analyzed in duplicate.
· Wa~er: Non-VOA analysis (.5'-l-liter volume): One sample.
' . QC for remedial action should be designed to meet clean-
'~ ';',.:'" up/closure objectivesfor the particular site. The basic ,. -
..,..-./". principles outlined should be applied. ,:
A general guide for field Qc samPles is presented in Table 3-7.
· -;.,". 6. Special Split-Sample Collection Instructions (7)
"'-.i'-" " a. Purgeable organics or VOAs: Individual samples are taken
~.: .._, .... rapidly in succession in the specified containers. The
.,i..i,.,ii,/j./?.. i, individual samples may then be analyzed in replicate. Uith
... ~.-. the exception of samples collected in a bailer, V0A splits "'
should not be' collected by pouring from one container into
another. "
A General Guide for Collection of Field QC Samples (7)
") QC Sample Description and Purpose Number of QC Samples
Trip or Travel Blank A sample container filled in the 1. One per sample set.
(~andatory for volatile laboratory with organic-free
organics) water and carried unopened during 2.,Greater than 20 samples
the sampling trip. It must be per set 5 percent trip
prepared by the laboratory supplying blank analysis should be
sample containers. It is used to done. Statistical need
identify contamination introduced and cost effectiveness
from the originating Laboratory. should be considered
The trip blank remains with the where large numbers of
collected .samples and is analyzed sample~ are involved. '
along with the field samples to
check residual contamination. Trip
blanks are mandatory for volatile
hydrocarbon analysis in water.
Field Blank A sample container filled with 1. One for each team per trip
(optional) organic-free water that is taken or
on the field trip. It is opened
and exposed at the sampling site 2. One for each relevant
· ,, '- to detect contamination from air sample type or
· . exposuhe. The water sample may be ' .'.
. . poured into appropriate containers 3. One per day at a single
to simulate actual sampling conditions, site
Contamination from air exposure can
vary considerable .from site to site 4. The need for field blanks
therefore, the need for this sample should be made relative to
should be evaluated relative to the site specific conditions
sampling situation.· Reference and sampling require,merits.
material (i.e.. chemically defined
. ?.' soil) can be used in lieu of organic-
. .- free water as dictated by the sampling
, . needs.
" : " "-' A sample whose composition or source ' 1. One per sample set up to
Blind Sample /.: ......'::'?::"i~ ':'
(optional) ".,..,,.,:.~:. ....... ' ..... . IS known tO the submtttee but not known 10 samples.
".~:.. ~.:,::!"', .:.'," ..... .~-...,. by the person logging in samples or the
.. -.~:' ,.':'":' .'~:'.'. analyst. It is submitted along with the Z. 10-14 samples: 5 percent
:. :: regular field sample set. When both the blind sample analysis.
· ~nttctpated sample composition and the )40 samples: requirements
"., blind status of the sample are not known should be based on the
· to the analyst, the sample is called a needs of the project.
a "double blind' sample. A blind sample
is used to check analytical performance
....'.- and proficiency.
Field Duplicate "'.. .' A second field sample collected identically 1. The need to collect
(optional except ...'.i '-:'-,.,..:-., to and t~rnediately after the first sample, duplicates is determined
required for volatile ~':~'~:~':?~i;:.,..,.:. ~,":'i'' ',. This provides a measure of analytical by project objectives.
analysis (VOA) . ,'' ~'m.~. "..~'. precision and second sample confirmation.
· ~.. It provides a means of determining random 2. The nund>er of sample
· .' error when adequate numbers of duplicates duplicates required is
are collected. Field duplicates may also determined by project
be collected as'splits. Duplicates can objectives and QC
also serve as blind field samples, requirements.
Split Sample 1_~/ The goal in obtaining splits is to 1. 10 percent
(optional) obtain subsamples that do not differ
significantly from each other or from 2. Need for these is determtnec
· " , the original sample. These are used by project objectives.
,' ... ~,~.. " to compare performance between/among
,. laboratories.
1_~/ Split sample collection has critical limitations. See special instructions in the following section.
b. Nonvo~£1e hydrophobic organics (e PCBs): Due to the
hydrophobic character of these compounds, it ts not prac-
tical to split an aqueous sample. Consequently, it ts
reco~nended that replicates be run on the extract only.
That is, when the analytical procedure for a hydrophobic
organic is followed, the extract should be carried ~hrough
.. in replicate through the column chromatography and aha.lyr-
ical determinations.
c. Other analyses: Samples are split into portions while the
original sample container is agitated.
d. Metals, except chromium VI and dissolved metals: When
splitting samples for metal analyses, the sample must be
acidified with nitric acid to pH <2 before dividing the
sample. Acidif~cation is especially critical if the sample
is basic, in ozder to prevent precipitation of metallic
hydroxides..
REFERENCES
l. D. B. Cohen, D. Gilmore, C. Fischer, and C. W. Bowes. 1983~ Water
Quality and Pesticides: 1,2-Dichloropropane (1,2-D) and 1,2'Dichloro-
propene (1,3-D). Special Projects Report No. 83-8SP. *California
State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA.
2. U. S. EPA. 1982. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste; Phys-
ical/Chemical Methods. SW-846, Second Edition. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, U. S. EPA, Washington, D.C. (A third edition
is available now, but because of extensive changes that were made,
U. S. EPA has not incorporated the third edition into RCRA regulations
at this time.)
3. U. S. EPA. 1982. Test Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater. EPA 600/4-82-057, U. S. EPA
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
4. U. S. EPA. 1983. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.
EPA 600/4-79-020, Revised March 1983. U. S. EPA Environmental Moni-
toring Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
5. U. S. EPA. 1984. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the
Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act. Federal Register:
40 CFR, Part 136, Friday, October 26, 1984. Washington, D.C.
'"~ 6 Department of Health Services. 1985. Recommended Methods of Analysis
.~. for the Organic Components Required for AB 1803, Fourth Edition.
California DHS Sanitation and Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
7. Fischer, C. 1986. Quality Assurance Management Guidelines for
Environmental Studies. Draft Report. California State Water
Resources Control BoArd, Sacramento, CA.
8. National Research Council. 1981. Prudent Practices for Handling
Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. ,National Academy Press.,
Washington, D.C.
'.' " : ","i" : ....
'74'
REVISED TECHNICAL APPROACH
LEO BLACK ESTATE
After consideration of comments received from Kern County Health Department in a
letter dated 2-6-90 and in a technical meeting on 1-31-90, it is proposed to deal with
the contamination problem at Leo Black Estate in the following manner:
Phase I Contaminated soil excavation/aeration per guidelines provided to WZI Inc.
by the County (Exhibit 1).
Phase .11 Determination of groundwater gradient from adjacent wells as identified in
Exhibit 2 in accordance with County guidelines of one-half mile radius
outlined in UTo50. Drill and install 2 groundwater monitoring wells (one up
gradient and one down gradient) to characterize the current water quality
beneath the property. The drilling, sampling, installation protocols as well
as the Health and Safety Plan for this site were previously described in the
workplan, submitted to the County on 11-29-88, supplemented on 5-10-
89 and deemed acceptable on 2-6-90.
Phase III Analysis of Water Samples.
Upon receiving the water analyses, all the available data will be integrated
within one-half mile of the site, including those off-site wells used to
establish the water gradient. A report' will be prepared summarizing the
field activities, the collection of data and analysis of any groundwater
contamination found beneath the Leo Black Estate.
' REGULATION 8
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
RULE 4 0
AERATION OF' CONTAMINATED SOIL
AND
REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
(Adopted July I(~, 1986) :
8-110-100 (;ENERAL
8-~0-101 Description: The purpose of this Rule Is to limit the emission of organic
compounds from sol1 that has been contaminated by organic chemical or
petroleum chemlc-al leaks or spills; to describe an acceptable soli .aeration
procedural and to describe .an acceptable procedure for controlling emissions from
underground storage tanks intended for removal.
8-/t0-110 Exemption, Stora~ePlles: Calculations of aeration volume under Section
20h shall not include storage piles that are covered per. Section 8-~0-303; nor
shall they include active storage piles.
8-~0-111 Exc~aptlon~ Excavated Hole: The exposed surface of 'an excavated hole shall not
be included in calculations of aerated volume under Section 8-~0-20q.
8-/10-112 'Exemptlon~ .Sampling: Contaminated soil exposed for the sole purpose
sampling shall not be considered to be aerated. Removal of soil for sampling shall
not qualify a pile as "active."
8-a0-113 Exemption~ Non-volatlle Hydrocarbons: The requlrem.:nts of this Rule shall not
apply if the soil is contaminated by a kno~vn organic chemical or petroleum liquid,
and that chemical or liquid has an initial boiling point of 302°F or hlgher~ provided
a
that the soil is not heated.
8--~0-200 DEFINITIONS
8olt0-201 Active Storage Pile: A pile of contaminated sol1 to which soil is currently being
added or from ~hlch soll is currently being removed. Activity must have
occurred or' be anticipated to occur within one hour to be current.
8-~0-202 Aeration: Exposure of excavated contaminated sol1 to the air.
8-~0-203 Aeration 0epth: The smaller of the fo110wlng: the actual average 'depth of
contaminated soU; or 0.15 meters (0.5 feet) multlplled by the c~aily frequency with
which soll is turned. The exposed surface area includes the pile of excavated soli
unless the pile is covered per Section
8r~0-20~ Aeration Volume: The volume of soll being aerated shall be calculated as
follows: the exposed surface area (In square feet or square meters) shall be
multlplled by the aeration depth.
8-/t0-205 Contaminated So11: Soil which has an organic content, as measured using the
procedure in Section 8-q0'-602, exceeding 50 ppm(wt).
8-/10-206 Organic Compound: Any compound of carbon, excludlng methane, carbon
monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates and
ammonium carbonate.
8-I~0-3 -',JULY 16, I~)86
I
8- 0-207 Orgenlc Conlentz The concentration of organic compounds measured In the
composite salmp!e collected and analyzed using the procedures In Sections 8-k0-
601 and 8-1~O-SOL
8-k0-z08 vapor Fr--:I The process of purglng gases from a tank using dry Ice to replace
organic vap,ors with an Inert atmosphere,
8-110-209 Ventilation: The process of purging gases from a tank by blowing or drawing
another gas through the tank, .
8-~0-300 STANDARDS
8-k0-]01 Uncontrolled Aeration.' A person shaZ1 not aerate contain;hated soil at a'rate in
excess of tl~at specified in Table 1 for the degree of organic content. The
llm;tations in Table 1 apply to the entire facility, and indlcate the volume of
contaminated soll that may be added~ on any one day, to soil that Is already
aerating.
Table 1
Allowable Rate of Uncontrolled Aeration
ORGANIC CON~T~ENT,' RATE OF UNCONTROLLED AERATION
ppm (wei Iht) ~1 /~i~) Cubic meters/day Cubic yards/day
<50 Exempt from this Rule. Subject to Rule 8-2.
50~-100 hS~.O 600
10,0-500 ~11.8 120
$0,0-1000 ~Lg 60
1000-2000 22.9 30
200,b-3000 11.5 15
300,0-~000 7.6 lO
~00,0-5000 5.7 8
>,5000 0.08 0.1
8-~0-302 Controlled Aeration: Soil may be a. erated at rates exceeding the limitations of 8-
k0-:301 provided emis.slons of organmc compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by
at least ~0:~ by weight. ' ' . .
8-k0-303 Storage Pil~es: Contaminated soll which is not being aerated shall be covered
except when soil is being added or removed. Any uncovered contaminated soft
will be considered to be aerated. The soil may be covered with a layer of
uncontamin~ted soll no less than slx Inches deep; or It may be covered with a tarp
or other covering~ provided no head space where vapors may accumulate is
formed.
8-J10-:310 Underground Storage Tanks--Oecommlssloning= Any person wishing to
permanentl~f decommisslon an underground storage tank which prevlously
contained brganlc compounds shall follow the following procedure: .
:310.1 Ali ~Iplng shall be dralned and flushed into the tank or other container.
310.2 All !lqulds and sludges shall be removed, to the extent possible, from the
tan.k. It may be necessary to use a hand pump to remove the bottom few
inches of product.
310.3 Val ,rsshallbe removed from the tank using one of the following three
8-~0-~ JULY 16, 15186
methods:
].1 The tank may be filled with water, dlsplacing vapors and
hydrocarbon liquids, rater used for this purpose must be collected and/or
dllsposed of in a manner approved by the APCO.
:]1.2 Vapor freeing.
· :].:] Ventilation.
8-J~0-311 Vapor Fr.eelng: No person'shall vapor free a tank containlng more than 0.001
gallons olT liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unless emissions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at least ~]0~.
8-110-312 Ventllatl~>n: Ho person shallventilate a tank containing more than 0.001 gallons
of' liquid organic compounds per gallon of tank capacity unless emissions of
organic compounds to the atmosphere are reduced by at least ~]0~.
8-110-~00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
8-110-1101 Excavation of Contaminated $o11-' The person resoonslble for aeration of any
contamin~ated soll shall provide the Oistrlct, by telephone, wlth the following
information. This shall be provided nolessthan 2q hours prior to the spreading or
heating of any contamlnated soU. The District shall be notified wlthin2~__h.o.ur_~Lf
any of tl~e parameters change.
401.1 E~timated total quantity of soll to be aerated.
q01.2 E~tlmated quantity of soil to be aerated per day.
q01.3 E~tlmatedaverage degree of contamination, or total organ!c content of
s~,~ il.
401.11 Chemlcal composition of contaminating organic compounds (i.e., gasoline~
methylene chlorlde, etc'.).
401.5 A description of the basis from which thes· estimates were derived (soil
analysis test reports~ etc.).
8-110-600 MANUAL OF PROCEOURES
8-110-601 Soil Sampling: One composite sample shall be collected and analyzed for every
$0 cubic lyards of excavated contaminated sou to be aerated. At least one
composlt4 sample shallbe collected from each inactive~ uncovered storage pile
within 24 hours of excavation. Samples are not required if the soil is
uncontaminated. '
601.1 Each composite sample shall consist of four separate soll samples taken
uiing the procedures described below. The soil samples shall remain
; parate until they are combined in the laboratory just prior to analysis.
601.2 a. topics shall be taken from at least three inches below the surface of the
p!le. Samples shall be taken using one of the following two methods:
11.1 Samples shall be taken uslng a driven-tube type sampler~ capped and
s~aled with inert materlals~ and extruded in the lab In order to reduce the
lc~ss of volatile materials; or
1!2 Samples shall be taken using a clean brass tube (at least three inches
I o
long) dr,van into the sol1 with a suitable Instrument. The ends of the brass
t~be shall then be covered with aluminum foil, then plastic end caps, and
.finally wrapped with a sultable tape. The samples shall then be
~mmediately placed on ice, or dry lce~ for transport to a laboratory.
8-40-5 JULY 16, 1986
8-40-~02 Heasurement of Organic Content~ 0rganic content of soil shall be determined by
the Regional ~/ater Quality Control 8oard's Revised Analytical Hethods~
Attachment 2~ 11/8/85~ or any other method approved by the APC;O,.
8-40-60:3 I)etermlnatlo~ of Emissions: Emissions of organic compounds as specified in
Section 8-l~0-3,02 shall be measured as prescribed in the Hanual of Procedures,
Volume IVt $T-7,
8-/~0-6 JULY 16t 1~86
nksm ,_'. -,' '
.......
0 "
REFINE
~!
o 112 MIL!
OI
'""""· I;. RADIUS
~B
LI,
· ... .",;" / ·
LE~EN~ .-
P.M. POWER MACHINERY, 3818 P~IERCE ROAD:
CONTAMINATED SOIL
D.O. DAVIES OIL CO., 3506 1,2 GULF STREET: RF. FEI:II~: WATI~ E].EVA'I~:~I,
FREI: PRODUCT PLUME Sl~rl'.
U.C. UNION CARBIDE, 3505 PIERCE ROAD: (I<3C~A- I.D.Ikq
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED
I WZI INC.
A.T. ASSURED TRANSPORT, 322~ GIBSON ROAD: BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
GROUNDWATER CChrTAMINAT'~D/ LEO BLACK' ESTATE
V.P. VALLEY Pi: RFOP~TING
CONTAIVlINATION SITES
4/90
fdZ! I#C.
UORD PROCESSING dOll TICKET
P~dECT DESCRIPTI~: ~//~ .0 ~ ~ ": .rF :oe DUE DATE:
TIHE DATE & TIME STAT. FORM TYPED PROOFED
DATE IN TIME REO OUT CC)DEe COOEe DESCRIPTIONS & INSTRUCTIONS BY BY
.~1/_~. z?,~__/~,~:,,, _~B_ ~
,!
eSTATIONERY C(~OES *FOP. H CODES
6gBOND D--DRAFT
LgLE TTERHEAD F--F i NAL
E~ENVELOPE
2700 M Street HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson. M.D.
Mailing Address: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard
Bakersfield. California 93301
(805) 861-3636
November 18, 1988
Tom Gilbert
2000 Julian Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Re: Soil and GroUndwater Contamination detected beneath the 500
gallon ga'solSne tank removed from Leo Black Electric, 3909
Pierce Rd., in Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
The Kern County Health Department has not received a
hydrogeological i~vestigation workplan for contamination detected
at Leo Black Elec:ric, 3909 Pierce Rd. in Bakersfield, CA. The
workplan must be pproved before the assessment is initiated.
As mentione¢ in previous correspondence, prompt action is
required in order to protect groundwater sources. /The workplan
must be submitted to this office by January 2?, 198~. .
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (805)
861-3636.
Hazardous Materials Management Program
AEG:cd
OUTLINE FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN
The items on the outline below must be addressed tn the
Geotechntcal Investigation Workplan. Missing information may delay
plan approval.
I. Site Background
A. Site Maps
1. TopogFaphtcal Maps showing site location
2. Site ISpectftc Plot Plan (including all process
equipment, surface and subsurface Piping, location of
all abandoned and existing tanks, product dispensers
and b~tldtngs).
B. Documentat$on of suspected onstte and offslte contamination
areas (including soil and groundwater analytical data).
!
C. DescriptiOn of known surface and subsurface geology and
hydrogeology' (including aquifer depths, gradients, drainage
patterns ahd topographical features.)
II. Proposal for t~entlfytng the plume.
A. Soil Sampling Program
1. Site Map showing location and depths of all proposed
soil sampling.
2. Justification and rationale for soil sample locations,
depths and contaminants to be analyzed.
3. Sampling Equipment and procedure.
4. Laboratory that will do the analysts.
B. Groundwater Sampling Program
1. Site Map showing location of all proposed groundwater
monitoring wells.
2. Details of monitoring well construction.
3. Prop6sed frequency, number and methods for obtatntng
groundwater samples.
4. Justification and rationale for monitoring well
localttons, construction, sampling frequency and
cont~minants to be analyzed.
5. Sampling equipment and procedures.
6. LaboFatorY to be utilized, analysis requested, and
QA/Q~ me,hods.
?. Proposed inventory of wells potentially impacted by
site and immediate sampling plan.
The assessmen~ firm should be familiar with the Kern County
Health Department permitting requirements for groundwater monitoring
wells and test hole~.
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
This site characterization summarizes all sampling done to date at Leo
Black Electric located at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California,
Section 23,T.29S/ R.27E, M. D. B. & M. (Exhibit No. 1). The
sampling was required by the Kern County Health Department (Amy
Green letter dated March 6, 1987).
Site History
Leo Black Electric .was in the business of sales and repairs on electric
motors. The property is located in an industrial area of Bakersfield.
The underground tank, which is the subject of this site
characterization, had a capacity of 500 gallons and was installed in
approximately 1956. The tank has been used intermittently for the
storage of gasoline. It was not used in the last two years prior to
removal; although, actual use has not been documented. No spills or
leaks have been reported.
McNabb Construction removed the tank on February 10, 1987. A
copy of application for permit for abandonment of the underground
tank is included as Exhibit No. 2. B. C. Laboratories collected and
analyzed soil samples from depths of 2 and 5 feet below the tank.
The analyses are included in Appendix No. 1.
The site characterization work plan required by the Kern County
Health Department, as stated above, was approved on June 23, 1987.
The sampling at the site was completed on July .1, 1987. All the lab
results were reported to Wilson Zublin Inc. by July 27, 1987.
Contamination Mappincj
The extent of contamination has been summarized in a series of maps
listed below:
A. Total Volatile Hydrocarbons
Exhibit No. 3 - Distribution at 10 feel~ below surface
Exhibit No. 4 - Distribution at 15 feet below surface
with cross sections A-A' and B-B'
(east-west, north-south, respectively)
4800 EASTON DRIVE #114 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309
POST OFFICE BOX 9217 * BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93389 · 805/326ol 112
C Page2
B. Isopach of Total Volatile Hydrocarbon Contamination (Exhibit
No. 5)
C. Oil and Grease
Exhibit No. 6 - Distribution at 10 feet below surface
Exhibit No. 7 - Distribution at 15 feet below surface
with cross section C-C' and D-D'
(east-west, north-south, respectively)
The data indicates that BTX contamination (Exhibit No. 3 and 4) from
the tank has reached groundwater. The toe of the contamination
plume (identified on cross section A-A', Exhibit No. 4) which has
formed may be suggesting a southwesterly down-gradient direction.
However, the borehole spacing was not designed to confirm our
interpretation of a westerly regional gradient.
The isopach of total volatile hydrocarbon contamination is presented in
Exhibit No. 5. The oil and grease distribution (Exhibits No. 6 and
7) is offset to the east from the BTX plume. This situation suggests
that there was a separate source of oil and grease contamination.
The oil and grease concentration is at its highest at around 10 feet
below the surface and decreases to less that 20 mg/kg at the water
table at 15 feet.
Discussion of Sampling, Lab Analysis
The location of the boreholes drilled and sampled are identified in
Exhibit Nos. 3 through 7. All the locations were measured from the 6
1/2" metal pipe near the northeast property corner; Borehole LB 2
was measured 5' south and 43' west of the corner. The locations on
the Exhibits, therefore, are precise.
Note that the location and number of wells deviates from the original
proposed work plan. The changes were discussed with Amy Green by
telephone and with the attorney handling the estate on July 1, 1987
prior to drilling the modified and additional locations.
Drilling and sampling was accomplished in accordance with the
methodology outlined in the proposed work plan submitted to the Kern
County Health Department on May 27, 1987. The data collected from
each borehole is summarized in Appendix No. 2 (a total of five
holes). The location at LB 4 was not drilled because contamination
was documented in the surrounding holes and because the sampling
that was done when the tank was removed was sUfficient.
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
C' Page 3
Table No. 1 summarizes the cores taken and preserved; those sent
into B. C. Laboratories for analysis are also identified. The lab
results of all the analyses along with copies of the Chain of Custody
documents are included as Appendix No. 1.
Hydrology
The lithology in all the boreholes was massive sand to total depth.
Groundwater was probably reached at 15 feet as noted on the
lithologic logs in Appendix No. 1, but not penetrated enough to
recover sufficient water sample for analysis. The 15' water table is
compatible with the regional setting. But as emphasized in the
proposed work plan, the distribution of data is inadequate to
precisely determine the gradient or the possibility of the water
reached in these boreholes being perched water above the primary
unconfined aquifer.
Report Prepared By:
Susan Chandler Kiser
California Registered Geologist #3831
Expiration June 30, 1988
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12752
Sample Desc.: LB ~1 10-11.5' SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
O1-Jul-87 O1-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 9.01 0 10
Toluene ug/g 19.21 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 11.84 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g 76.82 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g 181.92 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g 147.11 0 10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g 1847.92 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g 2293.83 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
LABORATORIES, Inc.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12753
Sample Desc.: LB gl 13-14.5' B SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 1.90 0 10
Toluene ug/g 25.91 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 47.00 0 10
p-X¥1ene ug/g 115.13 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g 260.53 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g 266.62 0 10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g 67.32 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g 2906.47 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g 3690.88 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AGfll~l~ TUfI~
LABORATORIES, Inc.
P£r#OL~/¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12754
Sample Desc.: LB ~2 10-11' SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Isopropyl
BenZene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
HydrocarbOns ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
AGIII£UL TUt~c
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLII',I. RE~. CHE~. ENG'.
P[TROL~U~ 41~ PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-8?
BAKERSFIELD, CA..93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12755'
Sample Desc.: LB ~2 15-16.5' SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene' ug/g None Detected 0 10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Isopropyl.
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AG~IICU~ TUIf~c
,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ABORATORIES.. IRC:.
J. J. CGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
P£T~OL£U¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12756
Sample Desc.: LB ~2 15-16.5' WATER
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
O1-Jul-87 O1-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments: NO WATER IN SAMPLE. SOIL MATRIX OF SAMPLE WAS ANALYZED.
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
~r~
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-~'~'~,\~
ated] constituents on this report.
LABORATORIES, Inc.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12757
Sample Desc.: LB ~3 10.5-11' B SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State'D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
~: ~. Eg~in Analyst
LABORATORIES, Inc.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12758
Sample Desc.: LB ~3 15-15.5' SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED-@ LAB: COMPLETED:
O1-Jul-87 O1-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 38 49 0 10
Toluene ug/g 48 62 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 129 80 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g 330 30 0 10.
m-Xylene ug/g 6?3 26 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g 324 74 0 10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g 3717.99 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g 5263.20 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry'Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
~r. 6~. E~i~-' Analyst
,,,,,,,, LABORATORIF. ,, IrqG.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENG,.
41~ PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-491
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12759
Sample Desc.: LB ~5 15-15.5' A.B.C. SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Oomments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (Cl.to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
~lin Analyst
A~JlI~I~ TLIJI~c
,,,,,,,, LABORATORIF.?,, In(:::.
PETI~OLEU¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jul-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12760
Sample Desc.: LB $6 10.5-11.0' B SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0 10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0 10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0 10
IsoproPyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Z BORATORIES. Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. Date of
P.O. BOX 9217 Report: 13-Jut-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93389
Attention:E. GREENWOOD
Lab No.: 12781
Sample Desc.: LB ~8 13.9£14.3' B SOIL
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
01-Jul-87 01-Jul-87 09-Jul-87
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Isopropyl
.Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Volatile
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Vol.
Hydrocarbons ug/~ None Detected 0.10
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. SW 5020: Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
VOLATILE. HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a benzene factor. These volatile
hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically
defined on this report.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
By ~ J~. J .,~i-~r[ Analyst'
LABORATORIES. I FIO.
J. J. EGLIN, IIEG. CHEM. ENGR.
I'ETI~O[~i/M 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Wilson Zublin, Inc. Date Reported: 7~21/87
P. O. Box 9217 Date Received: 7/1/87
Bakersfield, CA 93389 LaboratOry No.: 12754 - 12755
(addition)
Sample Description: .Oil ~ Grease, mg/kg
LB#2 10-11', Soil, sampled by
E. Greenwood/M. Rector 858.
LB#2 15-16.5', Soil, sampled by
E. Greenwood/M. Rector C-) 20.
B C LABORATORIES, INC.
~ J~J. £~in
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. ~[18, ~. ~fi~. ~.
Ptr~OttU~ 41~ PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Wilson Zublin, Inc. Date Reported: 07/28/87
P. O. Box 9217 Date Received: 07/24/87
Bakersfield, CA 93389 Laboratory No.: 14674 - 14676
Attention: Eric Greenwood
Sample Descriptions: Oil & Greaser mg/kg
LB1 @ 13-14,5' 07/01/87 .144.
LB2 @ 5' 07/01/87 318.
LB3 @ 10-10.5' 148.
B C LABORATORIES, INC.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
CtlAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Invoice to: Company-
' Address
Sample Type: (check, one) ' ·
Drinking Water Surface 'Water Was.tewater Oil
..... ) Soil'. Sludge ~ Other (specify)
Company's Address ~'~
Sa.pie(s) Received in' lab by: (~0_A_,.,4'"7 ''-1 ' . Da,e Time
.... · '. ' DaCe T~me
1. Sample Relinquished by:
Name Da~e Time
2. Sample Received
Name Da~e Time
3. Sample Relinquished b~:
N~e Da=e Time
t. Sample Received
N~e Da~e
5. S~ple Rel~nquished by:
Name : ' 'Date
6. Sample Received by:
Name Date Ti~
BORATORIES, Inc.
J' J' EGLIN. I~G. CHF. JqA. ENGL
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
CI~IN OF CUSTODY ~gCO~
Invoice to: Company ,~v---~ ~
~dress
Sample Type: (check.One) .".. :"
'Drinking ~a~er Surface ~a=er ~as=ewa=er 0il
'/So'il Sludge Other (specify)
ComPany' s .Address
Date ColleCted:. . ~ ~ ~ ? ~ '.Time collected,:'.
· . .. Date. Time
1, Sample Relinquished. by:
Name Date Time
2, Sample ReCeived by:
" Name Date Ti~e
3, Sample Relinquished by:
Name - Date
4, Sample Received by:
Name 'Date Time
5, S~ple Relinquished by:
Name Da te Time
6, Sample Received by:
Name ~ate Time
APPENDIX 2
DATE DRILLED:7/1/87 LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LOGGED BY:Rector, Klser,Greenwood TEST BORING LB 1
HOLE DIAMETER: 6-!~" O.D. WZl
! SAMPLES
DESCRIPTION Depth o~ m E REMARKS
(ft) ! NO. TYPEca-- c~ i:
ASPHALT and ASPHALT RESIDUE . .~ 8:30
SAND, tan, fine to very fine grained with -
ocassional medium to coarse grains,
angular to subangular, micaceous, -it
· A 1-3/8" Split spoon sampler
massive, slightly moist, no gasoline odor --- 5 Split 3 was used after a 2-3/8"
~ ~1 Spoon 2 sampler.(equipted with brass
Slight gasoline odor began at 7' _ ~ 1-3/8" 6 sleeves) failed to recover any
SAND, as above, except increasing sample material....
grain size with depth. . -
Did not attempt to use a 2-3/8".
Increasing·gasoline odor with depth ~- 10. 2 Split sampler· .
. Spoon 13 9:15 ' TOTAL VOLATILE
'1-3/8" HYDROCARBONS: 2293 ug/g
SAND; tan, medium to'coarse grained ' OIL and GREASE:144 mg/kg
with some finer grains,'subangular to ~ Split 2
subrounded, micaceous, massive, '[/~j3 Spoon 4 · TOTAL VOLATILE
slightly moist, strong gasoline odor. m 15 2-3/8" 6 HYDROCARBONS: 3691 ug/g
No Free Groundwater ' 1:0:10
Encountered ~
~ Sand, m'edium grained, massive ~ Siltstono ~ Asphalt Residue
~ Sand, coarse grained, massive ~ Clay or Claystone ~ Concrete
~ Sand, poorly sorted ~ Limestone ~ Hydrocarbon Odor
DATE
DRILLED:
7/1/87
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LOGGED BY:Rector, Klsar,Greenwood TEST BORING LB 2
HOLE DIAMETER: 6-1/2" O.D. I WZI
(ft) gy NO. TYPE ~ 8 ~ ~ REMARKS
ASPHALT and ASPHALT RESIDUE - I '" 6:30
SAND, tan, fine to very fine grained - I ~'.%'
with ocassional medium grains, -
angular to subangular, micaceous, -
massive, slightly moist, no hydrocarbon
odor 5
.~..,.,:~ Split OIL and GREASE:
. .!j ,~ ~ 1 Spoon 13 318 mg/kg
Slight hydrocarbon odor began at 7' - ~.:~ -"
SAND, as above, except 'increasing grain
size with depth, slight hydrocarbon odor. ,~-~ ' . "" ' .' .
-r.,, ' P . "TOTAL voLATILE
Increasing hydrocarbon odor withdepth ,-- '10 '~ 'S lit . 3.
";"."; '' ~I2 Spoon 3 7:20 .: .HYDROCARBONS:
SAND, tan, fine to coarse grained, ' ";".'¢[_11 '5 ' (None Detected)
very poorly sorted, subangular to . , ~'~ 2-3/8, '
subrounded, micaceous, massive, ~;i'.'_~ .. . '- . -OIL and'GREASE:
'~-~ ~'. 858 mg/kg
slightly moist, strong hydrocarbon odor. '
SAND, as above, except with less 'fines, ,;.-'~. Split .TOTAL VOLATILE
~ ~ .HYDROCARBONS:
becoming moister. -- 15 '3 Spoon "14: ' (None Detected)
Groundwater Encountered ' 1;3/8" -
at 15' 2~ (measured with a: "
steel tape covered with a .. ~, .. . ~ .Less. Than 20 mg/kg.
water; indicating, chemical)
· ' 20
Hole was plugged with seven
' 60 pound sacks of cement
~ Sand, fine grained, massive
~' Sand, medium grained, mass ve ~ S,ltst!ne ' '~ .Asphalt Residue
~ Sand, coarse grained, massive
Clay 9r Claystone ~ Concrete
~ Sand, poorly sorted ~ Limestone ~ Hydrocarbon Odor
DATE DRILLED: 7/1/87 LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LOOOED BY:Rector, Klser,Greenwood TEST BORING LB 3
HOLE DIAMETER: 6-~'2" O.D. WZl
' Depthlt ~ ' r SAMPLES ~='~ = ~=' REMARKS
DESCRIPTION (fi) ~ y ~ [ NO. TYPE ~n
ASPHALT ar;d ASPHALT RESIDUE 10:20
SAND, tan, very fine to fine grained with' ' I~
ocassional-medium to coarse grains, - [~
angular to subangular, micaceous, .
massive, slightly moist, no gasoline odor ~ 5 :';'.'~:.'i~ ~ Split 2
SAND, as above, except increasing 2-3/8" 6
grain size with depth., i : I.
SAND, tan, fine to medium grain~l ~'2 Spoon 13 . TOTAL.VOI.~TILE
with some coarser grains, subangular to 10 ~ Split · ~ ... HYDROCARBONS:
subrounded, micaceous, massive, (None Detected)
slightly moist, no gasoline.odor. 24]/8" OIL andGREASE: 148 tug,kg
Slight gasoline odor began at 14' . Did not attempt to use a
'2-3/8" sampler
SAND, tan, medium to coarse gralned~ ~ 15 ~ ~'3.. e..~SPlit 10 . 11:40 NOTE: Hydrocarbon 'rainbow"
subangular to subrounded, micaceous, · - appeared on :the-sampling tool
massive, very. moist, gasoline odor. · 1-3/8?
' ' ' '- '-'. ., "·'TOTAL VOLATILE
No Free,-,,,.,..,,,,,.,,,~Gr°undwaier" -:-' :: '. ' HYDROCARBONS:.., .... 5263 ug/g
~ Sand:' mediUm grained, massive ~ Siltstone ~ Asphalt Residue
~ Sand, coarse grained, massi've ~, Clay or Claystone' ' '~ ·Concrete
~ Sand, poorly sorted ~ Limestone ~ Hydrocarbon Odor
DATE DRILLED: 7/1/87 LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LOGGED BY:Rector, Kiser,Greenwood TEST BORING LB-6
HOLE DIAMETER: 6-~/2" O.D. WZl
DESCRIPTION D(feDt~h'Lith. 'SAMPLES '~ ---~ · -
elegy ~ [ NO. 71~PE ~3 ~ REMARKS
ASPHALT and ASPHALT RESIDUE 1:40
-
SAND, tan, very fine to medium grained, -
angular to subangular, very micaceous, -
massive, slightly moist, no gasoline odor _
--- 5 Split'
SAND, tan, fine tO medium grained, . ~1 Spooh" 11
subangular to subrounded, micaceous, 2-3/8"
massive, slightly moist, no gasoline odor.. '.
SAND, tan, fine to coarse grained - 2:00
with rare small pebbles, subangular to ~ 1 0 {~ .Split TOTAE VOLATILE
subrounded, micaceousl 'ma~ive, _ 2 Spoon 17 . HYDROCARBONS:
slightly moist, no gasoline odor. · _ 2-3/8" (None Detected)
SAND, tan, medium to'coarse grained, ' ....... ' I.' '
subangular to subrounCed, micac~ous, -
massive, very moist, no gasoline odor. --. 1 5 . ~ 3 Split . TOTAL VOLATILE
. SP°on · '.21 2:25 . HYDROCARBONS:
. Total . " 2-318"' . .(None'Detected)
No ga~oline odors : '.. ' ,. .' ..Depth . "..'. ·. ' .....
No Free'Groundwater - · :' ' ·
Encountered ' .. " '" "'' ~
~. Sand, fine grained, massive ~ Conglomerate' Il; Asphalt
~ Sand, medium grained, massive ~ Siltstone ~ Asphalt Residue
~ Sand, coarse grained, massive ~ Clay or Claystone. ~ Concrete
~ Sand, poorlysorted ' ~ Limestone ~ HydrocarbonOdor
DATE DRILLED: 7/1/87 LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
LOGGED BY:Rector, Kiser,Oreenwood TEST BORING LB-5
HOLE DIAMETER: 6-1/2" O.D. WZl
..... SAMPLES ~ = e
DESCRIPTION Depth Lith' =3 [ NO.; TYPE ~1~ REMARKS
(ft) ology -r-
ASPHALT and ASPHALT RESIDUE ~ 12:30
angular to subangular, very micaceous, - ·
massive, slightly moist, no gasoline odor .
~ 5 ~ Split 2
SAND, tan, medium to coarse grained . .; ....; ~..;.-; ,; l Spoon 3
with rare small pebbles, subangular to '~.'_',~.-.'~."~
.~. ~,. ~,. ~. 1-3/8' 6
subrounded, micaceous, massive, : ¢...,;...,,...~, ...
slightly moist, no gasoline odor. · - :~,.'.',;.'.'¢.':'¢ .. '
· '" - '~.'.',~,'.'-;;';0 , - 12:50 ' ·.
SAND, as above, excePt increasing. '~;..',t...'~.-.'~
grain size with depth. · ' " 10 ,...--~..-,_.,._, , 2 · , · ·
· "- ..'.,,~..r.,, "'Split ·
· ,, . .~..~.?;~_~.'.~?;-'.~:'"'-¢:"'-'~2 ~2 Spoon' , ,2 ,, ,:
'~'~2;~ ~* 2-3/8" 6 '1:10
SAND, tan, medium to coarse grained, ,""-"."'." ' ·
· .~ ...-~, .._-~ ?_-~ .
subangular to subrounded, micaceous, - '~',.:'-",,~..: ~' "-',,
massive, very moist, no gasoline odor. - ~,,.~,...~....,; , ,
No gasoline odors ~ 15 .-.~...~...-~.,; . Split Did not attempt to use a
No Free Groundwater Total ~ 3 - SPoon' 1.0' 11!40 ~ 2-3/8" sampler
. , 1.3/8- TOTAL VOLATILE ..
Encountered" ·, Depth .:HYDROCARBONS:
· · .. · (None·Detected)
~ Sand, fine grained, massive '~ Conglomerate ~: Asphalt'
~ Sand, medium grained, massive ~ Siltstone M Asphalt Residue
APPENDIX 1
FORN~IER LOCATION OF
JNDERGROUND TANK
u v FENCE
PROPERTY LINE X -~ ' ~
ASPHALT
(None Detected) (None'DeteCted) (None Detected) A'
LB 6 LB· 3 LB 2
2293 (:3
· . LB 5
ASPHALT
I
~ WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
BUILDING'
1
' il Bakersfield, California
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
-N- TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS
'9 FEETBELOW ~ SCALE IN FEET TEN FEET BELOW GROUND
GROUND ~ (ug/g)
· 0.. , 5 10 iGeol.: Kiser, Greenwood! 7/87 ~ DN: 144
· *Engr.: Wilson ~ EXHIBIT No. 3
D~
FORN~ER LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND TANK
- ' ' X FENCE ~
PROPERTY LINE
ASPHALT
1 ' ] 'leaa than II0
I
LB 6 LB 3 I. . __..~ LB 2
ASPHALT
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
BUILDING Bakersfield~ California
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
OIL AND GREASE
FIFTEEN FEET
SCALE IN FEET BELOW GROUND
(m~/k9~
--'. *13 FEET BELOW ',0' $ 10 Geol.:Kiser. Greenwoodl 7/87 I DN:146
' GROUND ' . Engr.: Wilson ] EXHIBIT NO. 6
BI
~ ~- FORMIER LOCATION OF
f ~,ROUND ' TANK
PROPERTY LIN X /,~ ' X FENCE
ASPHALT
A'
LB 6 3 LB 2 ._,.
· ~
8
LB LB 5
6 .
ASPHALT ·
~, WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
BUILDING
BakersfieldI California
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
VOLATILE HYDROCARBON
' SCALE IN FEET CONTAMINATION iSOPACH
'~' Ge°l.: Kiser, Greenw0od~ 7/87 ~ , DN: 147
0 5 10 Engr.:Wilson ! EXHIBIT No. 5
Kc(n County Health Depo~-tment'" Permit h...! --
1700 Flm~r Street, Bakersfl~eld, CA 93305 No. of ~anks to ~---~'~d
"t'T~ of ~plication (Fi~¢ Out O~ Application Per Facilit~
~a~rary Ci~sure/A~ndo~ent ~ _.. ~emanent ciosur~/~nao~aene
A. Pr}jeer Contact (mine, ~ c~e, pboge),[ ~ys ~_~/~_ Nights
.........S~ {Rural ~catio~ ~ly; . . .
T R Tele~one
O~ra.tor ~~ ' ' _' -~ ~elephO~e ...... --
~sis for ~il ~ and Gro~d~ter ~Pth.-~te'~l~tio'~ ~~ ~.~O~~
C. Tank Remova1 Cont~ ~~. ~~ ~, ~ Lice~e ~. '_ ~~(, ~-~
Worker's Cm~nsa~ion C~iitfidaelOn t O~ ~{~ Insurer ~~, ~,
~rker's Cm~nsa~ion C~YL'iffiea-tibN-l' ' ~ .... Insurer ~ '
D. .Chancel Cm~sition of Materials Stor~
Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~ercial name) Dates Stored C~emical Previously Stored
to
' to
to _
~. 'This applfcaeion flor: ~emoVal or ~a~ndoment in place
* * PLUg ~t~IDE INFO~'PION REQUESTED ~ ~g SIDE OP THIS SHE~ BEFORE
This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to thu best of my knowlu~lge is true
and correc~--') EXHIBIT No.
Signature~('~>~L~-[JJ~.Z_~__~.&' Title (~~.~¢'j~--Date _~/4~/~)~_
Pro,~ide Descr[pl:[on of 'cal Layout of Facility Usi~.~ .?e provided
Below;
~de All the Fol[owi~]
~cation of Tank(s), Piping & Dis~nser(s)' .
~ro~s~ S~pli~g Locatio~m Indicati~ Approximate ~p~
~/of Samples ' NeareSt Street or Intersection
~y Water ~lls or Surface Waters.Within 100' R~ius
Facil i ty
'Approved By ......... .. Scale _~,,~'~
', SYCAMO[
" ~(~ WILLOW DRIVE /~.' ....
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC ~' ,. ~. ....
3909 Pierce Road
Bakersfield :'~:
'~ ? Gl STREET
' '~' GE~
~ ~ OHIN WAY
. ~ )NIOWAY
T. SST
~ THOMAS AVE,
I. ·
I
ROSEDALE HW~'
RC~AL ST
. . ~ ~'
.... ~: UE
1...I ' ' ' '
-FASTON DRIVE
.. ';' , , ,
~ WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
~SCALE IN MILES -N-
o o.~ o.~ ~ LOCATION MAP
Geol.: Kiser, Greenwood~ 7~87 I DN:
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS
May 20, 1988
Amy Green
Kern County Health Department
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Site Remediation
Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Road
Bakersfield, CA
Dear Amy:
Sue Kiser spoke with you some time ago regarding°site remediation
requirements at the above captioned property. Inasmuch as we
have not yet heard from you, I would like to reiterate our
client's wishes to you. Tom Gilbert, a co-executor of the estate
of Leo Black Electric, has notified us of his desire to resolve
this matter.
As the Agent for Le° Black Electric, Wilson Zublin, Inc. is
available to meet with you, at your convenience, to discuss our
mutual interest in mitigation of the contamination problems on
the property, for the protection of the nearby groundwater.
Please call me or Sue Kiser to arrange a time to discuss this
project.
Very truly yours,
SCK:MJW:df
cc: Tom Gilbert
Co-Executor, Leo Black Estate
30051
4800 EASTON DRIVE #114 * BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309
POST OFFICE BOX 9217 * BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93389 · 805/326.1112
1700 Flower Street KETTN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT' HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
Telephone (805)861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
August 18, 1987
Regional Water Quality Control Board
3614 E.' Ashland
Fresno, California 93726
Attn: Jennifer Crone
Re: Soil Contamination Below an Underground Gasoline Tank at
Leo Black Electric
3909 Pierce Road In
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Crone:
The following information is part of the Leo Black facility
underground tank abandonment file. An assessment was performed
of the soil below the location previously occupied by a 500
gallon underground gasoline tank. Contamination was found to
extend down to ground water. No ground water samples have been
obtained yet. This letter serves as a referral of a site which
has significant contamination whlch threatens, and may be
impacting under ground water sources.
Any correspondence to the property owner should be mailed to:
Tom Gilbert - Executor of Property
2000 Julian Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93309
Please send copies of all correspondence pertaining to this
case to the Kern County Health Department. A proposition 65
report has already been made.
Sincerely,
Envir;nm~ntal Heal~ Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
AEG:aa
DISTRICT OFFICES
l"tel~nn . I ~mnnt . I.;~k. I,q~hella . Molave . Rldqecrest Shafter . Taft
Amy Green
l~?~0r0n County Health Department
Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Dear .Ms.. Green:
Attached 'is.the. report prepared by Wilson Zublin Inc. Summarizing
the site', charaCterizatiOn work done to date. BT.X .:contaminatiOn was
foUnd down to. water .but' it~ .has not been determined;whether it is the
main' aquifer' or a'perch, ed layer.. Because you :have indicated to .Sue
Kiser that. this case', will be referred to the Regional water Quality
Control'~ Boar'd,. no .remediati'on. recommendations are inCluded at. this
'If. you have: any.:other questions .regarding this work please contact.
Mary'Jane~ Wilson or.~Sue. KiSer at 805/326.1112."
"' ' Co:-execut0r of. Leo Black Estate
May 27, 1987
Kern County Health Department
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Attention: Amy Green
Re: Leo Black Electric
Site Characterization
Proposed Work Plan
Dear Ms. Green:
Attached is the Proposed Work. Plan for site characterization for the
500 gallon gasoline tank previously removed on the property of. Leo
Black Electric located at 3909 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California.
This work plan was required by your letter dated March 6, 1987,
attached hereto for reference. If additional information is required
for approval, please contact Susan C. Kiser or Mary Jane Wilson of
Wilson Zublin Inc. at the following address:
Wilson Zublin Inc.
Post Office Box 9217
Bakersfield, California 93389
Telephone: (805) 326-1112
Very truly yours,
Co-executor
Estate of Leo Black
Leo Black Electric
cc: Donna Roberts
Co-executor
Estate of Leo Black
Leo Black Electric
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
This proposal has been prepared in response to the request by Amy
Green of the Kern County Health Department (letter dated March 6,
1987), to submit a work plan for site characterization 'and mitigation
on the property of Leo Black Electric, located at 3909 Pierce Road,
Bakersfield, California, Section 23, T.29S., R.27E., M.D.B. & M.
(Exhibit No. 1). ..
Site History
Leo Black Electric was in the business of sales and repairs on electric
motors. The property is located in an industrial area of Bakersfield..'
The underground' taok, which is the subject of this site
characterization. Work' plan, had a capacity of 500 gallons and was
installed in approximately' 1956. The tank has been used
intermittently for the storage of gasoline. It was not used in the last
two years prior to removal; although, actUal use has not been
documented. No spills or leaks have been reported.
McNabb Construction removed the tank on February 10, 1987. A
copy of application, for permit for abandonment Of the underground
tank is inclcided as Exhibit No. 2. B. C. Laboratories collected and
analyzed .soil samples from depths of 2 and 5 feet below the tank.
The analyses are attached as' Exhibits No. 3 and No.' ~I.
Hydrogeologic Setting ..
.The water table beneath the site is between 10 and 20 feet below "
surface as shown in Exhibit No. 5 (Plate 5, depth to water in wells -
Unconfined Aquifer, September 1986 of the 1986 Report on Water
Conditions KCWA, Improvement District No. 4). The control used for
contouring Plate 5 is inadequate to accurately determine the local
gradient of water movement in the unconfined aquifer, although
regionally it is to the northwest. Unfortunately, the property is
currently located on top of a water table mound. Its apparent
position through time may dramatically shift as additional data points
are acquired and/or large fluctuations in recharge occur in the
unconfined aquifer.
4800 EASTON DRIVE #114 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 /
POST OFFICE BOX 9217 * BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93389 * 805/326.1112
/
Page 2
In addition, review of lithologic logs from wells near the property
indicate sands, boulders, and thin shallow clays of yet indeterminate
subsurface lateral extent. The stratigraphic complexity beneath the
site suggested by these lithologic logs indicate the published water
table map may have included data points from perched water. This,
along with the previously discussed questionable accuracy of the
regional water table gradient, means that the data for this study will
have to be carefully obtained and interpreted.
pr.,oposed Sampling Program
The proposed sampling program is tailored to accommodate a
multiphased study designed to optimize the number' of samples
required to delineate the extent of contamination. The proposed
boreh01e locations are identified on Exhibit No. 6. The rationale for
location and sampling intervals for each proposed borehole is
summarized in Table No. 1.
All samples will be appropriately collected and preserved as discussed
under sample collection methodolOgy.. Only the samples from Borehole
No. 'LB4 will be analyzed initially to confirm contamination and the
need for analysis of sa~'ples collected in Boreholes No. LB1, LB2, and'
LB3.
S~mple Handling and Collection Methodology
The approved work plan must be flexible to allow for on-site decisions
regarding sampling interval, total depth of each .borehole and choice
of samples for laboratory analysis.
Boring will. be done by 6 1/2" hollow-stem'auger and will be drilled in
the order presented on Table No. '1 to minimize' cross-contamination
from the auger, to the soil samples; although precautions will be taken
to sanitize the core recovery tool. Sampling will be accomplished by
use of either a 1 3/8" or a 2 3/8" split spoon sampler fitted with
three brass tubes. Sampling equipment will be prepared for use by
washing with non-phosphate detergent and rinsed with acet°ne.
On-site inspection of cuttings as they are removed from the boreholes
may identify lithologic changes or noticeable changes in contamination
that would require a specialized sampling program. Bulk samples will
be retained in labelled plastic bags for future reference. The
sampling intervals summarized in Table No. 1 should be considered a
minimum.
Upon collection, the cored soil sample will be prepared as follows:
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
Page 3
1. All three tubes will be capped with plastic, secured with
plastic tape, and labeled with indelible ink.
2. The middle tube will be stored on ice until taken by B. C.
Laboratory personnel, with Chain of Custody documents,
for laboratory analysis.
3. The remaining two capped tubes from each sample interval
will be preserved on ice as back-up samples.
Excess cuttings from the boring will be placed in approved containers
and disposed of on an approved facility such as Petroleum Waste, Inc.
with the appropriate Chain of Custody documents.
Samples will be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene (BTX)
analyses, as recommended by the Kern County Health Department.
B. C. Laboratories is a certified hazardous waste laboratory that
routinely collects and analyzes soil samples· associated with
underground tank removal. The analytical procedure utilized for
analysis by B. C. Laboratories is in Appendix No. 1. The holding
time· for samples shall not exceed fourteen (14) days and most likely
will be analyzed within 48 hours.
The rig will be equipl~ed with .a. bailer in the event that the water
table is reached. PVC.pipe with three feet of plastic screen to
recover a water sample as free from up-hole contamination as is
possible and placed in a B. C. Laboratories container. The
groundwater samples will ~then be tested for BTX contamination. All
groundwater holes will be abandoned by filling with concrete grout.
Litholo~ty and Plume Delineation
Upon completion of the sampling program, lithologic logs of each
borehole will be prepared, 'Cross-sections will be constructed to alloTM
review of the lab analyses of .the samples within the penetrated
hydrogeologic framework, Maps that will graphically' depict the limits
of the plume will be prepared, The Kern County Health Department
.guidelines for the edge of the gasoline contamination are (1) a
significant drop in contamination level or (2) contamination completely
disappears,
Health and Safety.
Wilson Zublin Inc. personnel will implement a series of procedures in
order to maintain a safe 'and healthy working environment during· this
field investigation. All subcontractors on the site will also comply
with Wilson Zublin Inc.'s health and safety procedures. The follOwing
protective gear will be available pn site in the event that air
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
Page 4
monitoring equipment (HNU-PID) indicates the presence of benzene,
toluene, or xyl'ene in concentration greater than permissible exposure
levels of 10 ppm, 200 ppm, and 100 ppm respectively, for eight (8)
hour time weighted averages (29 CPIC 1910.1000, air contamination).
o Twin-cartridge respirators (half-mask)
o Chemically resistant gloves and clothing
o Safety glaSses
In addition, hard hats, and chemically resistant steel-toed boots will
be required for Wilson Z'ublin Inc. personnel on location. A list of
emergency response personnel and addresses will' be constructed
identifying nearby .fire stations, hospitals, and police stations.
It is Wilson Zublin Inc.'s policy to evaluate and re-evaluate site
conditions throughout the operation to maintain a safe and healthy
working environment and make modifications to the above
health/safety outline when necessary.
Site Maps
The site-specific plot plan is' included as Exhibit' No. 6.' .Only Surface
features, are shown, subsurface piping is unknown at present. Prior
to boring activity a metal detector survey will be utilized to establish
the location of any subsurface piping, The borehole locations are
identified on the Exhibit as No. LB1, LB2, LB3, and LB4.
Final Evaluation
The final repor, t' will document and .sUmmarize the data' collected for
the. site-cha ra'cteri'zation. Recommendations for remediation,, if
needed, will be discussed.
Susan Chandler Kiser
California Registered Geologist #3831
Expiration June 30, 1988
WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
" ."', ' SYCAMO
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC ~"~ WILLOW DRIVE ~'""'
3909 Pierce.Road
Bakersfield :'~.,
·, ,' SH
.,:', ,,_.... Gt, STREET .,,,
,/,~ ..~*A". ..... ,..- ' G E
..,'/' ' u~ O L)RIN WAY
/" ~ NTONIO WAY
/
;
/ -L ~: IS ST
--' <~ THOMAS AVE,
ROSEDALE HWY.
..L ,
~j "-~- - COMMERCIAL ST
,
/_.
· ",';h-'
.">: UE
_ FASTO/~/ _
I~WlLSON ZUBLIN INC.
BakersfieldI California
LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
SCALE IN MILES -N- WORKPLAN
o 0.8 LOCATION MAP
1700 Flower Street, 8akersfi~eld, CA 93305 No. of ianks to ~--~'~&d
. ~.--,, <" {{ ~PLI~TI~ ~R P~IT ~ T~~ OR P~~
?'~"~-~f~licati°n (Fil~ Out One Application Per Facilit~
~,~ra'ry Cl~ufe/A~,%do~e~ ~ _.. ~e~anent Closure/A~3ndor,,ent
Fauility ~dreS~ ~qO~~~~ Nearest Cross St. ~/~
T R -' '~'~ (Ru~~a~o~ ~ly) . .
~ne~ ~ ~~____ Tele~one
O~ ~ator -- -~~ j ~ - ,. Teleph°ne
~dress ..... · ~- ~~ ' '~ ~ ZiP
Soil Characteristics at Facility ~~~ ~~,~~,.' ',
~sis for ~il ~ and Ground~t~r ~pth ~teminatio~
Worker's C~nsatio~ C~r~ifi~a[~io~ f- O~ .~(~ Insurer _~~ ~~ ~,.
~dress ~ ~f~, ~~'~ Zip g~8 Tele~one ~q~.g/~
Pro~s~ Sta~[f~ ~t~ ~ f~ .--~ ~ro~s~ C~Pletion Date _ {~./5~.
~rker's C~nsation Ce~t'ifidatibn ~ .... Insurer '~
D. Ch~ical C~sition of Materials Sto~
Tank ~ Chemical Stored Jnon-co~ercial name) Dates Stored Chemical Previously Stored
. -- .................... ' if different)
........ to
to
E. ~scri~ Meth~ for Retrievim S~,ples_: '.~~~. ~. .
, ~ t ,
~dress q'[O~ V~~ ~, ~~~C~ Telephone
~, Th~s application ffo~: ~emoval or ~a~ndo~en~ in place
· * P~E ~OVIDE fNFO~TION REQUESTED ~ ~D SIDD O~ TH~S SHE~ BEFORE SU~I'~Pf~2
I
This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best bf my know].u~]ge is true
a~¥J correc~ EXHIBIT No. 2
Pro'~id~ DescL'~pl:[ot~ of Ph~ Layout of Facility Usir~ , Provided Below;
£r~ude All the Foliowir~] .~,~fomation:
~~cation of Tank(s), Piping .& Dis~nsef(s)
~ ;ro~s~ S~plh%g Locatio~ Indicati~ Approximate Dep~
~/of Samples
~ ~earest Street or Intersection
~y Water Wells or Surface Waters,Within 100' R~ius
Facil i ty
'Approved By ; Scale
· ,,,,,.,,¢, LA B'O R AT., .R ! ES
I. I. [6~IN, I(G, ¢ [ · [ ,
PETrOl EUM
MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA, 9330li PHONE 327-491
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
' NABB CONST. ATTN: BRIAN MC NABB Date of
&l& STARK STREET REPORT:2-1~-8?
AKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:243&
ample Description: LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
UNDER TANK ' . ·
ATE ~' DATE SAMPLE ." DATE. ANALYSIS
iAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
2'10-87 2-11-87 2-17-87
Minimum
Reporting Analyses Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene , ~g/g '5.2q 0.10'
Toluene Hg/g 50.3& 0 '10
Ethyl Benzene - '~g/g .23.~ 0.10
p-Xylene .'~ ~g/g ' 148.28 0.10'
m-Xylene ~g/g. 148.28 0.10
o%Xylene ~g/g .188.39 ~ 0.10
Isop~opyl Benzene' ~g/g 10.91 0.10
Volatile Hydrocarbons Hg/g 145~.3g 0.50
Total Volatile HydrocarbOns ~g/g 2034.?9 0.10
EPA 5020/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS '
COMMENTS: Oil
VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: QuantifiCation of volatile hydrocarbons present
(C1 to 'C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are
'in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report.
Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal t.o, or greater
than any other constituent, or the combined total.
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated
constituents on this report.
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. EXHIBIT No. 3
LABORATORIES
J. J. [Gl, IN, II(G CH(M (~GI
MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIEt. D. CA. 93308 PHONE 327.491
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MC NABB CONST. ATTN: BRIAN MC NABB Date of
2616 STARK STREET REPORT:2-19~-87
BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:2437
Sample Description: LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
5' UNDER TANK
DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE. ANALYSIS
SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED ~ LAB: COMPLETED:
2-10-87 2'-11-87 2-17-87
Minimum
Reporting Analyses Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ~g/g 31.55 0.10
Toluene ~g/g '90q.30 0.10
Ethyl Benzene . ~g/g 323.59 0.10
p-Xylene ~g/g. .1983.96 "' 0.10
m-Xylene ~g'/g .1983.96 0.10
o-Xylene ~g/.g .2004.81 0.10
Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g' 2q.73 0.10'
Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g 280?.5? .0.50
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g 10074.4? 0.10
EPA 502018020: DRY MATTER BASIS
COMMENTS: Oil ~ C;~ease: 133 mg/k'g'
VOLAT. ILE HYDROCARBONS: QuantifiCation of volatile' ·hydrocarbons present
(C1 t.o ~20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are
in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report.
Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater
than any other constituent~ or the combined total. '
TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated
constituents on this report.
WILSON ZUBLIN INC. EXHIBIT lqo.'4
BLACK ELECTRII :,
3909 Pierce Road
Bakersfield
RIO I
$ ~ WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
- BakersfieldI California
" -.- LEO BLACK ELECTRIC'
/ J, SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN
? .f'
--~ DEPTH TO WATER IN WELLS
/ .-.---~ ° ,.:. UNCONFINED AQUIFER
I
' ' t SEPT. 1986
FROM: 1986 REPORT ON KERN COUNTY~VATER J 5/87 ~ DN:128
WATER CONDITIONS AGENCY-DIST. #4 I EXHIBIT NO. 5
"'"°' : · · ' · : : * : ' :" ""* '- Bee-
: -,- ,,*,~,: ,~:**,,:,,,,: ,, ,,:,, ,,.,..,.·
"-*:-r':.:-.*':-.'.'.,*
!
,
!
I '
!
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DETAIL INSERT I
, , . ,, , ,- .
I-'-- '~i ',
!
,
!
'
!
!
!
'
!
~WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
-BakersfieldI California
~TANKEXCAVATIONREMOvALFROM ~ ASPHALT LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
-.- SITE CHARACTERIZATION
I WORKPLAN
~ CEMENT SLAB BUILDING SCALE IN FEET SITE-SPECIFIC
PLOT PLAN
Goolo~¥: S.C. Ki$or I £XHISII ~0. t~
TABLE NO. I
Phase I
Sampling Program* Location. Rationale Sampling Depths
Borehole #LB1 10' south of Borehole #LB'(-- assuming northwest gradient 2', 5', and 5' thereafter to base
to evaluate up-dip presence of of contamination
contamination plume
Borehole #LB2 10' east of Borehole #LB4. to assess lateral presence of 2', 5' and 5' thereafter to base
contamination plume of contamination
Borehole #LB3 10' west of Borehole #LB4- assuming northwest gradient, 2', 5', & 5' thereafter if
to evaluate down-dip presence contamination is minor or
of contamination plume non-existent; .sampling will
Borehole #LB4 Former Location of to confirm contamination found 2', 5', 10', 15', (stop at least
underground tank in samples taken at time of 2' above water table)
tank removal
* Locations shown in Exhibit No. 6, the property map of Leo Black Electric property
APPENDIX 1
Total Petroleum H~drocarbons (Gasoline and Diesel)
1.0 .ScoPe and Application .-
· 1.1 This method is for the determinat.i'on o~ gasoline and diesel in
contaminated groundwater, sludges,' and soil.
1.2 This method is 'recommended for use by, or under' the supervision of,
analysts experienced in the operation of gas chromatographs and in
the interpretation of.chromatograms.
2,0 S~mmar~ of Method
2.1 This method involves the determination of volatile hydrocarbons
(gasoline) by headspace method and the determination of semivola-
bile organics (diesel) by the extraction method. A sample of the
headspace gas or an aliquot of the extract is injected into a gas
chromatograph (GC) and compounds in the OC effluent are detected
by a flame ionization detector (FID). An aliquot of each sample
will be spiked with standards to determine percent recovery and
limits of detection for that sample,
2.2 The sensitivity of this method' usually depends on the level of
interference~ rather than on instrument limitations. Table 1 lists '
the limits of detection in the absence 'of interferences for Water
and soil samples.
3.0 Interferences
3.1 Solvents, reagents, glasswares and other sample processing hardware
must be demonstrated to be free from interferences under the
conditions of the analysis by running, method blanks.
3.2 Before processing'any samples, the analyst should demonstrate 'daily
. .. through the 'anglysi'~'"'of a"-solvent .bl-~nk.that..the entire system is
interference-free.
4.0 Apparatus and Materials
b.1 Oas-tight syringe: 1 ce with chrom.atographic needles.
4.2 Vial with cap: ~Q mL capacity screw cap (Pierce #1~075 or' equivalent).
Detergent wash, rinse with tap and distilled delonized water, .and
dry at 105°C before use.
~.3 Septum: Teflon-faced silicone (Pierce# 12722 or equivalent). Deter-
gent wash, rince with tap and distilled, deionized water, and dry at
105°C for BO minutes before use.
Separatory funnel: 2-liter, with Teflon Stopcock.
4.5 Kuderna-Danish'(K-D) aparatus.
4.6 Soiling chips: Solvent"e~tracted, approximately 10/40 mesh.
Water bath: Heated, with concentric ring cover, capable of temperas.
burs control. The bath should be used in a hood.
4.8 Gas chromatograph: .Analytical system complete with programmable gas
chromatograph suitable for on col,,mu injection and all required
accessories~ including FID, col,~- supplies, recorder and gases. A
data system for measuring peak area is recommended.
4.9 GC column: '6-ft x 1/8".I.D. glass column packed ~ith 55 SP'2100 on
Supelcoport '60/80 mesh.
4.10 Detector: Flame ionization detector .(FID).
4.11 Microsyringes: l0 ~L, i00 wL, 200 wL.
4.12 Erlenmeyer flask: Pyrex', .250 ml capacity with a screw cap.
4.13 ~chanical Shaker
5.0 Reagents ,
5.1 Stock diesel standard solutions: Prepare' commercial diesel stan-
dards in carbon disulfide. Place 9 mL of CS2 into a l0 mL glass-
stoppered volumetric flask. Allow to stand for a few minutes.. Weigh
the flask ~ th~ nearest 0.1 mg. Using a 100 wL syringe, Immediately
add an amount of diesel to the flask, then reweigh. Be sure that
the liquid falls directly into the CS2 without contactin~.th~-neck
of the flask. Dilute to volume, stopper, m/x by inverting the flask
several times.. Calculate the'concentration in Ng/ML from the net
gain in. weighb.' Secondary working~standards can be prepared from
the stock.standards.
5.2 Stock gasoline standard'~olutions:' Ga~oli~e'stock standards can be
prepared as above using co~ercial gasoline as standard in dodecane.
5~3 Sodium sulfate, .anhydrous, ACS, granular
5.4 Carbon disulfide, glass distilled, high purity.
5..5 Dodecane, purified.
6.0 $~,ple Collection~ Preservation.'aBd'Handling
6.1 Grab samples must be collected in glass containers and V0A vials.
Fill the sample bottles in such a manner that no air bubbles pass
through the sample as the bottle is being filled. Seal the bottle so
· that no air' bubbles are entrapped in it. Solid and semisolid samples
are %o be taken in the same. w~y. Maintain the hermetic seal on the
sample until time of.analysis. \
6.2The samples must be iced or refrigerated from time of collection
~mtil analyses or extraction.
6.3 All 'samples must~ be analyzed within 1~ days of collection.
Procedures ' ~
7.1 Organic liquid - Organic liquid can be analyzed by dissolving a known
amount of sample into certain volume of car~on disulfide in a volu-
metric flask.
7.2 Water
7.2.1 Transfer 1 liter of sample to the 2 liter separatory funnel.
7.2.2 Add 60 mL of carbon disulfide to the separatory funnel.
7.2.3 Seal and shake the funnel for 60 sec with periodic venting to'
release.vapor pressure.
7.2.4 'Allow the phases to separate for minim~u~ of l0 minutes. If
emulsion occurs, the analyst must employ mechanical tech-
niques to complete the phase separation.
"~.2.5 Collect the extract and repeat the"extraction two more times
.. using fresh port~ons of solvent. '
7.2.6 Combine three ~xtracts"and dry it by passing it through a
column of anhydrous soidum sulfate.
· 7.2.7 Collect the dried extract in a Kuderna-Danish evaporative
concentrato~ equipped with a 10 mL collection ampule.
'~.'2.8 Add 1 or 2 clean boiling chips to the flask and attach a
three-ball Synder column. Prewet the Synder column by adding
1 mL of solvent~'.to'%he top. Place.the K-D apparatus~o~ a
? steam or hot water bath. Adjust the ~ater temperature as
.required to complete the concentration-in 15-20.minutes.
~en the Volume of liquid reaches 1 mL, remove the'K-D
'apparatus ~nd allow it to drain for at least 10 minutes.while
cooling.
7,2.9 Rinse the.K-D apparatus with a small vol~e of solvent.
Adjust the sample volume to 5 mL with the solvent to be used
in instrumental analyses.
7.3 Soil and Sludses
7.3.1 Weigh 20.0 g sample into a 250 mL screw cap erlenmeyer flask~
Add 80 mL of carbon disulfide.
7.3.2Cap the flask and shake on a mechanical shaker for at least
~ ho~rs.
7.3.3 After the extraction is complete, filter the extract and dry
it by passing through a column of anhydrous sodium sulfate.
'F.3.q Collect the dried extract in K-D flask, fitted with a 10 mL
concentrator tube and a three-ball .$ynder column. Wash the
extractor flask~and the sodium sulfate with a=.portion of
carbon disulfide.and c011~t it.into the K-D flask.
7.3.5 Add 1 or 2 clean boiling chips and concentrate the extract to
5 mL as discussed in 7.2.8 and 7.2.9.
7'.~. <;as Chromatographic ~nditions "
'F.4.1 The recommended gas chromatographic column'and operating
conditions are:.
Column: '6-ft x 1/8" I.D. glass column packed with 5% SP-2100
on Supelcoport, 60/80 mesh with nitrogen carrier gas at
20 mL/min, flow rate. Column temperature is set at 40°C at
the time of injection, hold for 4 minutes, and progremmed at
lO°C/min, to a final temperature of 265°C for lO'minutes.
7.5 Calibration
7.5.1 Establish gas chromatographic.operating.parameters as specified
in 7.4.1. By injecting secondary standards, adjust the
sensitivity of the analytical system for the analysis of
gasoline and diesel in environmental samples.' Detection
ltmtts for the extraction method and the headspace method are
listed in Table 1. Calibrate the chromatographic system with
with the external standard teqhnique. At least 3 concentra-
tion levels should be used for the preparation of the calibra-
tion curve. One of the external standard should be at a
concentration near, but above the method detection limit.
The other standard should correspond· to the expected range
of concentration froun in real samples or should define the
working range of the detector.
7.5.2" ·Using injections of 2 to 5 pL of each Calibration standard,
tabulate total peak height or area responses against the mass
injected. The results can be used to prepare a calibration
curve for gagoline and diesel.
7.5.B The working calibration curve must be verified on each working
day by the measurement of one or more calibration standards.
If the response varies from the predicted response by more
than il0%, the test must be repeated using a fresh calibrm-
tion standard. Alternatively, a new calibration Curve must
be prepared.
7.6 ~al~.sis of Samples
7..6.1 Extract
7.6.1.1 Inject 2 to 5 wL ~o'f the' sample extract using the
solvent flush technique. Record the volume injected
to the nearest o.05 ~L, and the resulting total peak
areas in the chromatogram. ~
7.6..1.2 If the total peak areas exceed the linear range of
the system, dilute the extract and reanalyze.
7..6.1.B Examples of chromatograms of gasoline and diesel are
shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
7.6.2 IIeadspace Me.thod
7..6.2.1 Place 20 g (mL) each of the waste sample into three
separate 40 mL septum seal.vials.
,
7.6.2.2 Dose one 'sample vial through the septum with 200 ~L
of the gasoline standard in dodecane. (Concentration
· 7500 ME/mL). Label this "spike".
7~6~2.~ Dose' a. separate (empty) 40 mL sept.um seal rial'with
200 ML of the same standard. Label this "standard''.
7~'6.2.4 Place the sample, spike,. and standard vials into a
90°C water bath for 1 hour. Store the r-m,_ining
sample vial at 4.0°C for possible future analysis.
.7.6'.2.5 While maintaining the vials at 90°C, withdraw 1 mL
of the headspace gas with a. gas-tight syringe and ~.
~ analyze by injecting into a GC, operating under' the
conditions mentioned above.
?' 7.6.2,6' Analyze the standard and adj'ust instrument sensitivity
to give minimum response of'at least 2x the back-
ground. Record and sum up a.ll peak areas of the
gasoline standard.
7.6.2.7 Analyze the spike sample in the same.manner. Record
all 'peak areas.
7.6.2.8 Analyze the unclosed sample in Section 7.6.2.7.
7.6.2.9 Small sample size should be used if the concentra-
tion is found to .be outside the concentration range
of the instrument.
8.0 ..Qualit~ Control
8.1 Standard quality assurance practices should be used with this method.
Method blank,.solvent blank should be analyze~ alongside with each
batch of samples. Fie%d replicates should be collected to validate
, the precision of the .sampling technique. Laboratory replicates should
be analyzed to validate the preci~ion ~fltha analysis. Spiked
samples for each matrix should be analyzed to validate the accuracy
of the method.' Where doubt exists over the identification of peak(s)
on the chromatogram, confirmatory techniques by alternate method
should be performed.
9.0 References
"Test l~thods for'Evaluating Solid Waste, Pl~sical/Chemic~l Methods",
SW-846, Second Edition, ReVised.1984. · Methods 3510, 5020.
Table 1 'MethodDetection L~mtt
Parameter F~trix .,. Extraction~Method. Headspace Method
Gasoline Aqueous 0.5 wg/mL 5'.0 wg/mL
Soil lO.O pg/g .5.0 ~g/g
Diesel Aqueous 0.5 pg/mL '~--
lo.o ~/~ "---
soil
" PK UD = ~.{}6
THRSH = 3
fir REJ ~ 18800
~' 1. ~1.~
~ .' ...~ :. ~.~
~.~1
~ .'
· ~. 3.~
. · ..; ~.~ .. '.
"
8 ·
'
'~ -- 3750 ~g ~tke~ on 5 g of
---- soil
ST
, ~" · j' RLII'I ! 34
~, I.
: .. · . j i RT ~RE,Q TYPE I::R/tIT ~'g~l:'fl'.: ~'
. 0.52 40832. BV 0.042 ~... 'J.,..--
· '" - - · 0.?1 28ZI908 YH O. 1,~6 1l. ~.:?':2
'' ...2
· · ~.45 FIG. 2
_' ........ . Chroma'togram of diesel.
2 pL of 300 pg/mL
.
6.89
II.JG ' .
· o J4~46
" "' ' '~' ': 15.~8
· ... .. · ~~ ~'~
' ' ' . ' . ~ J~.25
. . · . 88.37
· " · · ~ ~1.5~
.
' · .I
"' ' "' I
1700 Flower Street N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN HEALTH O;FICE.
Bakersfield, Cellfornle 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
June 23, 1987
Leo Black Electric
3903 Pierce Road
Bakersfield, California 93301
RE: Site Characterization Proposal.
Dear Sir/Madam:
A representative from this department reviewed the site'
characterization proposal submitted for Leo Black Electric on
Pierce Road, and discussed different aspects of the report with
Susan Ktser of Wilson Zublin Inc. The Proposal meets the approval
of this department and' may be implemented, as long as the
following discussed change, is made:
The proposal had sampling being initiated at two feet below
grade. The sampling depths were discussed with the contractor.
For the purpose of this report it will not be necessary to
have samples retrieved two feet below grade and analyzed.
The Kern County Health Department must be notified 24 hours
before samples are retrieved.
After all field work is complete, and laboratory results
received, a 'final report must be' written describing the extent of
contamination and suggesting mitigation measures. The final
report must be submitted to this department within 30 days of
analysis completion. The department's Mitigation Outline is
enclosed. It may be used as a guide in preparing your final
report.
Please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636, if you have any
questions.
Amy E. G~een ' '
Environmental Heal~qi Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
AEG:sw
Enclosure
cc: Wilson Zublinlnc. OlS~lCTOF~lC£S
D~a~ . ~mnt LekeIsa~lle M~ave . Rldgecm~ . Shaf~r . ~fl
~[TIGATION OUTLINE
~tttgatton, or Remedial Action, is the method to lessen, alleviate,
abate, correct, or clean-up the effects that a release of hazardous waste
may have on the environment. Mitigation Incorporates a remedial.action
plan that is site specific and shall include at least the' following
elements:
1. Brief discussion of the problem from prior site characterization or
' other studies
2. Findings:
a. Vertical and lateral extent of contamination plume.
b. Results of all analyses, including Interpretation of results.
c. Hydrology of the site, Including soil types down to ground water.
3. Remedial Action Alternatives Discussion
a. At least 2 alternatives plus a "no action" alternative must be
evaluated.
b. Cost-benefit analysis of each alternative is to be included.
c. Discussion must address short and long-term threat and effect to
air, soil, surface and ground water, and biological receptors,
and a discussion of potential migration routes.
d. Time frames for complete remedtatton for each alternative are to
be listed.
1700 Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT; HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
Telephone (805)861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
March 6, 1987
Leo Black Electrlc
3909 Plerce Road
Bakersfield, California 93301
RE: Soil contamination beneath the 500 gallon underground fuel tank.
Dear Sir/Madam:
The laboratory results received on March 4, 1987 show soil
contamination in the samples retrieved below the 500 gallon gasoline
tank. To evaluate the extent of contamination present tn that area you
must prepare a site characterization proposal.
This department does not approve of any additional work in the area
around the contamination either in defining the plume or providing a
permanent cover at the site until the site characterization proposal ts
approved by this department.
The department's outline for preparation of the site
characterization proposal is enclosed. It may be used as a guide in
preparing the proposal. Please submit your proposa! to this department
within 30 days.
If you have any questions please call me at (805)861-3636.
Sincerely,
Hazardous Materials Management Program
AEG: sw
DISTRICT OFFICES
Oelano Lamont . Lake Isabella Mojave . Rldgecrest . Shaftar . Taft
PLAN
VIEW
~=ORME. ,OCATIO. O~
~RGROUND T~
/ FENCE ~ ~ '
X PROPERTY LINE /~~ ~ ASPHALT
/ / / '
LB 6 / LB 3 I LB 2 / / / ~__~
I ' ~00 '
~ O GREASE' (mglkg)
X ~ WE EET BELOW GROUND
xx LB I 00 ' LB 5 X ,'
I
* 9 FEET B~OW 0 5 10
G~UND m ~ ~ mm
' .. (
OI LB 6 LB 3 LB 2' ~NDSU~ACE I
' / /~ i------~----~ '/ ' ' OIL AND GREASE (mg/kg)
/ ' i~ ' . ~ WILSON ZUBLIN INC.
~0.- [ 1~ ' Bakersfield1 ' California
q ~ il / I L ~soo// LEO BLACK ELECTRIC
/ ~ ~133 I ~ ~6on~ / SITE CHARACTERIZATION
~ ~~. OIL AND GREASE
~ CONTAMINATION PLUME:
~ ' ~ ~NDWA~R ~ MAPS and CROSS SECTIONS
FORM,~R LOCATION OF INDERGROUND TAN:<
- X PROPERTY LINE ASPHALT
6000 / o ~ '
FIFTEEN FEET BELOW GROUND ·
[ (ug/g)
400 ~
LB 1 ,r/ LB 5 ~a ~/~o
- 200 ~ SCALE mN FE~ '
· 13FE~BELOW 0 5 '10 - ,.. - m I m m
A'
AI LB 6 LB 3 LB 2 ~NDSU~ACE I .
/ UNOERGR~ND T~. ~ HYDRogeN O~R
-- ~ ~'. TOTAL vOLATILE
HYDROCARBONS
o
o 5
SCALE IN FEE~
10 - (None Dete~ed) (None Dete~ed) / Non~ Dete~ed)
WILSON
ZUBLIN
INC.
BakersfleldI California
12.: ............. [._..~.~ .... ~~...~.. ~(NonoOete~ed~ ~WA~R ~ MAPS and CROSS SECTIONS
Geol.: Kiser, Greenw0odI 7/87 I DN: 145
Engr.:Wil~n I EXHIBIT NO. 4
1700 Flower Street N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertaon, M.D.
Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
· DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH !'. "'
Vernon
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE Permit Number A351-05
OF UND~.RGROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES STORAGE. FACILITY.
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS: OWNER NAME.AND ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR:
Leo Black 'Electric Leo. Black Electric' 'McNabb Construct/on
3909 pierce Road .: . .3909 pierce Road ,:, .-,:'261.6 Stark Street ~ .,
Bakersfield,_ CA' *. .i" ' Bakersfield, CA 93308 '?:'.. ~.'/'.:Bake:rsfield, CA 93305,:)
~ERMIT TO ABA~NDON , ,. .." '' PERMIT EXPIRES '."::JanuAry 9,; 1988 '
I TANK(S) AT ,ABOVE: · , APPROVAL DATE :."::.-January 9, .198~'~ '.
1. Peraittee ' .must .obtain''' a ~ire. 'Department permit..Prior' to ·
2. . All' procedures, used.mUst 'be in'acCordance ~lth req~ir ~ents-'of
~uidelines' developed '~or' implementation of Kern coun~ Ordinance
copy.of.:.these..requirements are enclosed with thiS: permit. "::' '""'~""
3. 'A minimum ..o~ two samples mus~ be 'retrieved benea.th the center of ~he tah. k~,a~
depths of approximately 2~ and 6,.
4. All samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total
petroleum hydrocarbons.. '- ..
5. Advise this office of .the time and date of Proposed sampling with 24 hours
advance notice..
ACCEPTED BY DATE
DISTRICT OFFICES
Delano . Lemont Lake Isabella Mojave . Rldgecrest . Shatter . Taft
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TA~.K,-UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LE'AK)/~.,~iTAMINATION SITE REPORT
EMERGENCY / HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY-'SER~NC~ES ST.ATE TANK ID #
ORTDATE . LOCAL CASE ~ REGIONAL BOARD CASE · ~ US EPA ID · '
-
~ < TSCD
-- ( )
D E' ISC VER O ' -- I HOW DISCOVERED ~ INVENTO~CONTROL : '~' sUBSuRFACE MONITORING
~ ~ ROUTi,E ,O,ITO,I,G ~OVAL ~ ,UISA,CE CO,DITIO,* U] OTHER;
~z
mm DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN METHOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
a~ H~CHARGE BEEN STOPPED* ~ REPAIR TANK ~ REPAIR PIPING ~CHANGE PROCEDURES
~ ~TANK LEAK ~ UNKNOWN " ~ ~ ~ ~OVERFILL ~CORROSION
< AGE~ YRS. ~ UNKNOWN '
~ ~ PIPING LEXK ~RIAL ~RUPTURE/FAILURE E~SPILL
~ ~ OTHER (SPECIFY) ~ OTHER NOWN ~ OTHER
RESOURCES AFFECTED WATER SUPPLIES AFFECTED THREAT- UN-
~ YES NO THREATENED UNKNOWN YES NO ENED KNOWN WELLS
~ AIR (VAPOR) ~ ~ ~ IZ~ PUBLIC DRINKING
OTHER (SPECIFY) C~ ~ ~ ~ OTHER(SPECIFY)
~ ~ GROUNDWATER BASIN NAME ~ HNKNOWN
COMMENTS:
0
COMPLETE AND ATTACH A CLEANUP TRACKING REPORT IF ANY CLEANUP WORK OR PLANNING HAS STARTED dSC OS (IO/88)
Kern County Health Dep~ctment Permit
1700 Flower Street, Bakersfl{eld, CA 9]]05 No. of Canks to ~--Al~'~'oron~d .{
~ '" ~~ ~PLI~TI~ ~R P~T ~ T~~ ~ P~~
',4c.~~' Application (Fi~ Out One Application Per Facility.,
[-]~-~porary ~lo~s'ure/A~ndonme'~ __.. _.. ~emanent Closure/Abandorunenu
i A. Pro~ject Contact (name, a.~e~ code, phone): ~Days ~ ~1~~__ Nights
Facility Name ~:~) ~~'~~-~. i '' ~ -_~i..~-.-. _.. ..~ ~-~..
Facility Addres~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~C~~_ Nearest Cross St. (3~]/./I~
SEC'- ~ .... (Rural LoCations Only) . '
T R ~ . _
~ner ~ ~]~~~. Tele~one .~
O~rator ~ - ' Telephone
~dress ~ - ~ ~~ ~= "Zip
- Soil Characteristics at Facili~y~ ~~~=~ ......
~sis for ~il ~ and Gro~t~r ~Pth ~te'~i~ttO-~~ ~~ ~~~
pro~s~-ScarCi~ ~ce ~Sjl~ - Proms~ C~pletion ~t~, ~~.
Enviro~eutal ~es~e~ Con,actor · ~, ~ Li. cen~ No.
Pro~s~-si~rtf~ ~te .~//~- , Pro~s~ C~pletion ~te ~/~t
~rker's C~ation C~ifidati6~ ~ .... Insurer ~
D. Ch~ical C~sition of Materials Stor~ ~
Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~ercial name) Dates Stored Chemical Previously Stored
tO
to
~ratory/T~t ~11 Perfo~ ~yse, of S~,les ~, C<;[~:
~dress _~J~ .V/~ ~, ~~ Teleph°-ne
F. T~S a991ica~ion for: ~oval or ~a~an~o~ent in place
* * PLFASE PROVIDE INFOIRMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET BEFORE SUBMI'[TING
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW.
This foden has been completed under pe~lalty of perjury and to the best of my know]c~dge is tru~
and correc~
ln.q~ude All the Followi~] k?~.,fomatioq: ~
~Location of' Tank(s), Piping & Dispense~(s) .
--~ j~rop~sed Sampling Locations Indicating Approximate Depth
~//of Samples
~ Nearest Street or Intersection .
· Any Water Wells or Surface Waters Within 100 Radius of
Facil i ty