The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK #1-C-05/08/87 . JOHN R. WILSON~ Civil Engineer ~ ~oston Drive Suite IT CORPORATION BAKER~I[LD ~ CALIFORNIA SUMP ABAN~MENT IT CORPORATION 270l Patton Way Ba~field~ Callfernie 9~08 (805) · -. . ~ :~:~ JOHN R. WILSON~ Civil Engineer ' ~- Bakersfield ~ California (8~) ~2~-6460 .~¢ ' · '... [. IT CORPORATION ' ~ 2~1 Poffon Woy :' ~:~ ;-~-~ ~"' ~ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMEN '-~"'~te . ' ' APPLICATION . ' ' * *f ~inent ordin°nce~, ~'c~es ond/or regUlotio In conforml w~th* prows~ons o ~ .. .... ,~ . ~? ..... ~ :,~:~.. ~.~ ~ ~ ..:. ?. ;. ~. ~.. :.?... to displaY: store, instoil, u~, O~rote, sell or handle materials or priests- involving~.or~creotmg.:c~ ditions deemed hazardous to hfe or pro~ as follows: ..... .'...: ' -. _ · ......... ~ ....... . e-~. ............ .... uthorized ~ta~ive Permit denied- · ......................................... : ..... ~te - . .......... * .... . ~.-.~. . - ~, .- .. ~.~?..:.'~.:.::? , . * :...~ .. 1700 F~wer Street K'~RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT' HEALTH OFFICER Bakemfleld, California 93305 ., · ' ~on M Hebertson, M.D. ~lephone (805) 861-3636 --' "' EN~RONMEN~L HEALTH DIVISION ~ DIRECTOR OF EN~RONMENTAL HEALTH "'~' ' ~ay 8, 1987 -. Chris Lyons C-E Narco = , P.O..Box 1593 Bakersfield, California 93309 Dear ~. Lyons: ?his ts to advise 'you that this department has reviewed the projeCt results for the fuel seepage tnvesttga~lon conducted at C-E ~atco, Division of Combustion ~nglneerlng Inc., 4550 P~e~ce Road, Bake~sfield, California. '" Based upon ~he findings described satisfied that the assessment Is complete and no significant soil contamination re~ains fro~ the fuel tank leakage at the site., Thank you for your coopera[lon In this matter. " Sincerely, . ~n~lron~ental Health SCe¢lallst ~azardous ~terlals ~ana~e~ent Pro~ra~ ..................... AEG.[aa ..................................... · ........................ : ............... , ............................. . .................. DISTRICT OFFICES Amy Green Kern County Environmental Health Department 1700 Flower St. Bakersfield, Ca. 93305 I.T. Corporation is pleased to submit the proP0sal'~0 your department for the removal of the washout sump at the C.E. Natco Facility. SCOPE OF WORK I.T. Corporation will perform the following tasks in removing the concrete lined washout sump and contaminated soil. Sump Removal and Disposal Excavation of the concrete lined sump and soil along with any signs of leakage (stains). A pre dispoSal sample sent to Petroleum Waste Inc. to be analyzed for acceptance. Soil Testing Soil in the sump excavations will be inspected for signs of leakage (odors. and stains). Soil samples will be collected and analyzed in full accordance with the Kern County Ordinance Code and Requirements as setJouth by Kern County Health Department. Laboratory 'analysis will be performed by IT's certified analytical laboratory in Cerritos, California o= BC Laboratory in Bakersfield,'California.~ Concluding Remarks I.T. is a full service environmental fi~m familiar with all aspects of underground storage tanks. Our offices in Bakersfield and Irvine are staffed with engineers, field chemists,, and soil scientists highly qualified to provide all services,.including any remedial measures. Regiona! Oftice [TCorporation.' P.O. Box 3345 Bakersfield, Ca. 93385 805-763-4171or 805-589-9383 2703 Patton Way Bakersfield,Ca. 93308 oo IT CORPORATION If .you have. any questions. Please contact me. ~t the Bakersfield Office. -~ Respectfully Submitted, Duane Fie-id Chemist Bakersfield Regional Office D~M/kp .... ?: etroleunt ste, nc. ~R O. Box 3366 Bakersfield, ~'Coliforn? 93385 (805) 325-5355 :. C'E'tNATCO Date Reported: · - Date Received: 10-3-86 I' - ..................... . ................... La-boratory'"N~j~ ...... 3'0'l-:Z .......... sample Description: Sump Sludge Total Metal Concentrations Arsenic (As) (-) 0.02 Barium (Ba) (-) 10.0 Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) 2.21 Chromium (C,') 9.95 Copper (Cu) 13.3 Lead (Pb) 24.5 Mercury (HE) Nickel (Ni) 18.2 Selenium (Se) 0.52 Silver (Ag) Thallium (TI) 7.18 Vanadfum (V) 11.0 Zinc (Zn) 413 Organic Lead (-) refers to "less than" ~ox 25~66 California 9~5 (805/ ~2_5-5~55 Bakersfield,'' C.E.'~Natco Date Reported: ---. Date Received: .10-3-86 ~:_. . : ..................................................................................... L~bo~-t~?y 'NO ~ Sample Description: Sump Sludge Total Metal Concentrations (mg/kg) Arsenic (As) (-) .03 Barium (Ba) (-), 15.0 Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) 3.81 Chromium (Ct) 10.8 Copper (Cu) 11.7 Lead (Pb) 29.3 Mercury Nickel (NJ) 21.4 Selenium (Se) 0.21 Silver Thallium (TI) 14.6 Vanadium (V) (-) 15.0 Zinc (Zn) 638 Organic Lead (-) ·refers to "less than" INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Tank Testing Sendces . ' :~' ' IT C~'~:poration offers complete services for the Pz'ocedu.re .'' i:' :" ...... 7'-evaluation; detection and measurement of leaks in ........................ Fi~]'ur~-:l -i'~ '~ ~'~ematic' df'l T's-heliu-~-~n]~ testing underground storage tanks. Leak rates as Iow as .001 gallons configuration. A combination pressure and temperature' ;':~ per hour can be detected. This is well below the .05 gallons reference probe is inserted into an existing opening in the ' ~ ~. per hour detection level required by the National Fire tank. One of the ports on the reference probe serves as an . · :" Protection Association (NFPA). opening for tank pressure readings. Pressure variations due to ambient temperature changes are compensated for by Advantages comparing the measured differential pressure between the IT's fast and reliable test method for finding leaks utilizes reference probe and the tank at various temperatures. The helium gas for the test medium. This approach yields more temperature, pressure, and differential pressure data are precise results than competitive hydrostatic tests. The inert used to calculate the helium leak rate, which is then related ; properties'of helium eliminate the flammability problems to the liquid leak rate via the Bernoulli equations. Product · :- encountered when pressure testiog is done with air. leak rates~as Iow as .001 gallons per hour (less than 10 ' Precision results are achieved regardless of the product gallons per year) can be detected by this procedure. contained in the tank. Testing can be conducted when the tanks are empty, Other. Services ; avoiding the complications of having a large inventory of .,:IT Corporation offers other types of tank testing, product on hand. Tank and piping systems can be tested including hydrostatic pressure and ultrasonic thickness jointly or separately to help locate the leaks. Testing is done testing. Tank testing programs are tailored to each rapidly with a minimum of down time. customer's need. IT's tank testing personnel are highly trained and have Customers include, but are not limited to, gasoline ~ tested hundreds of tanks. Sophisticated data recording stations, paint companies, solvent distributors, electronic instruments and computerized data handling systems are companies, and waste oil tank owners. For more information utilized, thus reducing operator error. If requested, a on these and other test methods, call the IT Corporation · registered professional engineer provides.certification that engineering office in Martinez, California at (415) 228-8400. the tanks have met the NFPA standard. Tank Test Configuration i., DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE ~ INERT GAS ~ CONNECTION TANK TEMPERATURE COMBINATION PRESSURE & UNOERGROUNO ......................................... ~[EMPERATURE PROBE ~__ ......... i; ......... TANK ......... i ...... i" ' "~ Regional OHice ].RI~ ,Amalfi [')ri~r~ · ~/r~rfin~7 ("'r/lifnrnicl O,lqq.'~ . INTERNATIONAL . , Underground Storage Tank CORPORATION .- :. '- Service Program ' Introduction In many states, legislation has ' been passed, or is pending, '~ ~' ntemational Technology rec~uirinc~ the inspection and ' ...... ~ ........... ~ Corporation offemacomprehen-~ -~-:~tificati0fi 6-f ~xisting tanks.and ...i. sive program of underground revised design standards for new industrial storage tank leak installations. The IT turnkey identification and site mitigation approach to problem-solving can .' services. The full complement of IT assure underground tank o~ners ~ . .-,~' engineers, hydrologists and complete regulatory compliance ,..~ ,'.~ technicians responds and security of operation. :'i · ,': , to know'n or sas- ''': " '" :' pected leaks from ................................................. ~ ......... ~ri~ergfbhnd -stor- age tanks which may ..,: pose environmental '"~ · and safety hazards. IT clientele for this : service include ~, major petroleum -.~-.,~.. industry representa- tives, regional. · manufacturing firms, ~ oil compames, chem- '::q ;! ical companies and ' '" ' ~ -:, '~' '-:' other industries which have traditionally maintained under- ground storage tanks. Many of these tanks, installed in the 1950's and '60's, are now beginning to corrode. When leaks in these ,~. tanks occur, either from corrosion, structural damage, loose fittings, or human error, valu- IFs comprehensive Underground Storage able product may be -' Tank Service Program effects remedial lost, entering the soil action for subsurface tanks which have corroded and whose leaking contents and contaminating threaten ground water, ground water. If petroleum, prod- ucts accumulate in neighboring sewer Key Features systems, adjacent basements or utility vaults, '~' nitial investigations mayinclude explosive hazards may develop. In I inventory records review and a order to limit such hazards, and the leak probability analysis which liability associated with them, takes into account factors such as ..... ~ ......................................................... IT'S"~h'n d~'r~gr ~2t rf~'- t~nk-service .......... soil' ~omposition~-~'esistivit~H ~ ........... provides thorough investigation, moisture, sulphides content, the i contamination assessment and age of the tank and tank operating appropriate site remediation, procedures. INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGy CORPORATION...Creating a Safer Tomorrow Next, tank and pipeline testing. will be conducted, followed by ground water sampling, chemical analyses, vapor detection' and electronic liquid and vapor mon- itoring, and a range of geo- physical investigations including determination of product nature, source and migration routes. Borings approximately two inches in diameter will be drilled at help determine the extent of contamination, if any. Based upon a comprehensive evaluation of this data and the determination of the presence of soil and/or ground water con- tamination; IT experts will ......... document-environmental condi- - tions and conduct hydrological and ' geological surveys to map its extent. Information on ground water depth, dynamics, and flow direction will all be compiled in order to recommend cost-effective and technically sound remedial · . options. If a facility is suspected of contributing to ground Water con- tamination, IT's analytical services can fingerprint the contaminant using gas chromotagraph and atomic adsorption instruments. By then sampling the content of underground tanks and comparing Gasoline Trench ~ Collection S?stem it with the analytical results, it is possible to accurately identify the tank site may then be monitored for ThroUghout, IT's underground leaking tank. This is especially several months after repairs to storage tank service program critical where multiple service ensure that leakage has stopped, emphasizes speed and targets a stations are located and there may schedule aimed at minimizing the be up to 15 underground storage Other remedial steps may include client's revenue loss. The initial tanks beneath a given intersection, construction of subsurface slurry contamination assessment is based '*~'- walls for contaminant isolation and If the soil Or ground water is' on a one day completion schedule contaminated, additional borings containment, ground water without site closure. IT's total service or wells will be drilled to further decontamination with carbon concept eliminates the need to hire define the area and magnitude of adsorption units, and the a variety of subcontractors, each of the contamination. Monitoring development and execution of site whom can only deal with one - wells and recovew wells with closure plans, aspect of the problem. appropriate pumping systems may IT's full scope of capabilities be installed to recover lost product, provides complete start-to-finish If necessary, tanks will be project control, including the ability excavated for r. epair or replace- to safely transport, process and ment, with the thorough removal of dispose of solid and liquid wastes, contaminated soils and liquids to and to complete all regulatow an authorized disposal site. The reports as required. INTERNATIONAL For more information please contact: ~ 'TECHNOLOGY 'International ?echnolog~-¢orporation .................... CORPORATION 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard Box 2995 Torrance, CA 90509 ~ .(213) 378-9933 Or your nearest IT office. ~03- ~0-85 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Engineering Services International Technology Corporation (IT), the nation's leading environmental management firm, offers fully integr.~ed services which include protessi.onal project management..IT staff is experienced in directing and controlling technical ~s~c_op,e,~cost, and schedule.of projects ot all sizes and degrees of complexity. Services for Industry and'~overnment IT has in-depth experience in project management for both industry and government. Our industrial expertise includes many multicontractor projects requiring integration of schedules, procurements, accounting, and technology activities. We are equally skilled in the development of overall quality assurance and health and safety programs for all our projects. In the government sector, the IT staff Personal computers at the Job site network to our job tracking systems, allowing instant has managed or participated in the access to cost and schedule control software systems. management of major projects following strict system acquisition Full Range of Computer Systems IT's project management systems are guidelines. These include projects IT has project management systems de.~igned to provide our managers supervised under both Project capable of overseeing simple as well and clients with the information they Management Systems (PMS) and Cost as complex projects. For those jobs need to control a project. A varied and Schedule Control Systems (CSCS) involving a limited number ot activities menu of reports including cost and guidelines, and a straightforward logic, IT staff uses schedule information is available to ~~~ personal computer-based soft,are satisl'y specific project requirements. Specialize~l Training systems to prepare schedules and As part of our management package, IT qualifies its personnel through a assess cost/schedule performance. IT uses a strict change control process sophisticated in-house project l:or more complex jobs, we use which requires client approval o! management training program leading Primavera cost/schedule control scope, schedule, and cost changes to certification as an IT project manager software directly linked to our iob prior to their execution. or proiect director. Our training tracking accounting and purchasing program involves both classroom systems. Such a linkage allows direct At International Technology instruction and hands-on experience access to current payroll, purchasing, Corporation, management control of with specialized software and job and commitments data. Furthermore, engineering projects goes hand in tracking systems, This comprehensive Prtmavera handles complex logic, hand with technical excellence. program is supplemented by outside critical path network analysis, and classroom instruction and progressive sophisticated variance analysis while responsibility with more complex allowing access through personal projects, computers at a job site. ~INTERNATiONAL-~ ..... ~ ....... ~or more~informatiOn~please contact: TECHNOLOGY International Technolog~ Corporation CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters Engineering Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, 'CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146-2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 INTERNATIONAL. TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Engineering Se ice$ International Technology Corporation (IT) offers a unique combination of professional services, including engineering, analytical, and cal~abilities to perform remedial investigations and feasibility studies (RUFS) at hazardous waste - sites. Our engineers have been involved in site investigations and assessments for more than twenty years, covering the tull range of activities from field investigations through data analysis and evaluation. To meet the various requirements of an RUFS, IT assembles experienced multi disciplinary teams of specialists, including environmental engineers, hydrologists, chemists/geochemists, and public health scientists. These teams carry the proiect through from preparation of a remedial investigation work plan to submittal of the RUFS report and actual design and construction of the remedial action. Remedial Investigations The focus of our investigative projects is the determination of the nature, location, and extent of existing contamination, the rate ot contaminant migrat~b-n, the Intematlonat Technolog~ Corporation's turnkey service approach begins with significance of existing and future comprehensive Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies. site characterizations, and contamination problems, and their environmental audits and assessments of existing sites and facilities. effects on human health and the environment. In defining these areas,' Such studies accomplish three major Feasibility studies are conducted in our staff uses many types oI field purposes: accordance with theComprehensive investigative activities, including Environmental Response, geophysical surveys, hydrogeologic · Identification and evaluation o~ all Compensation and Liability Act and geologic characterizations, Waste potential remedial alternatives (CERCLA), U.S. Environmental inventories, elevation surveys, and · Comparison of these alternatives Protection Agency (EPA) requirements sample collections' for lab analyses, based on environmental health and guidance documents, and impacts, degree of confidence any applicable state and local Feasibility Studies in success, time required for regulations. The IT staff is particularly Based on the results of the remedial implementation, and associated sensitive to .the ,development of investigation for your site, IT costs site-specilic health, safety, and quality assurance plans as well as to completes a feasibility study to · Recommendation of the alternative .. ~cbmmunit'K relations support. -determine 'cost:effectiveTremedial .................... best suited for-removingor actions which combine our containing the contaminants on knowledge with years of practical, site to levels considered saJe to hands-on experience, public health and the environment. Remedial Investigations/ 1 [i easib, ility' Stu dies Analytical Capabilities ~" ' ~'~"~ IT remedial investigations are supported bY a full range of analytical services our network of certified laboratories strategically located across the U.S. We offer services ranging from routine chemical ana~ses, to specialized techniques sp~ecific for dioxm, pesticides, an~ PCBs, to the ability to handle nuclear or comingled wastes. All IT laboratories are fully equipped with state-of-the-art instrumentation which is reviewed regularly to achieve new analytical ccrpabilities and improve precision and accuracy of current techniques. In addition, we'have several mobile analytical units, including one equipped as a radiochemical laboratory. Quality Assurance and Control Quality assurance and control (QA/ QC) of all work are insured by our in-house, corporate QA/QC program covering both our investigative and analytical efforts. In accordance with this corporate program, IT prepares written, site-specific QA/QC plans for each remedial investigation project undertaken. Utilizing systematic on-site sampling and precision analysis, IT enginee~s obtain the inionnation to design and execute appropriate ~emedial techniques to each m~lque aspect of an environmental problem. Permitting Capabilities Our engineers and scientists At IT, we combine specific experience undertake all remedial investigations in the completion of RI/FS projects and feasibility studies with a thorough with a broad background in all areas knowledge and understanding of of environmental management. IT's current environmental regulations integrated, full-service capability and permit requirements. Senior offers our clients a complete package IT staff have completed numerous that assures faster turnaround time ~_~, projects requiring extensive and better quality control of final interaction with regulatory agency results. personnel as well as presentations at public meetings, and can assist clients IT field drilling and sampling teams have through negotiations with regulatory practical experience in the application agencies regarding the scope of of both surface ~nd borehole geophysical recommended remedial actions, techniques for site studies. TECHNOLOGY International Technology Corporation CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters . Engineer~ng Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146-2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 INTERNATIONAL . TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Engineering Se ices International Technolog~ Corporation (IT) is a national leader in computer modeling and contaminant transport studies. With a.highly trained staff, including geo~gists, geochemists, hydrogeologists, meteorologists, engineers, statisticians,' and computer -scientists, our expertiseranges-from simple PC-based systems through complex 3-D mainframe models. IT scientists and engineers have dembnstrated in-house modeling capabilities for surface water, ground water, and air resources' and for contaminant transport in these media. Our models include verified and validated computer codes with well-tested proprietary sottware packages. : Modeling Capabilities Computer modeling is a cost-effective investigative tool for both environmental assessment and design considerations. In the experienced hands of IT scientists and engineers, this tool has been useful in a variety of situations including geochemical IT's predictive models offer a cost-effective means of evaluating contestant transport assessments, hydrologic impact and simulating remedial alteznatives. assessments, optimal placement of monitoring and interceptor wells, adsorption. By modeling chemical · Saturated flow simulation of remedi~l-alternatives, reactions at states of equilibrium, the - 20 one-, t~o-, 'and three- evaluation of contaminant transport, geochemical controls on contaminant dimensional models and atmospheric dispersion transport, attenuation, leaching, and - Both analytical and numerical modeling. In addition, IT personnel mineral stabilities can be assessed. types are expert in the design of field and The results of such evaluations are laboratory programs for the collection often then used in conjunction with of data used with modeling hydrologic contaminant transport · Sol. ute transport programs. A professional statistical assessments. - 13 one-, two-, 'and three- staff is available in-house to assist with dimensional models problem definition, design of plans for Hydrologic Models - Both analytical and numerical data collection, and data analysis IT offers a multidisciplinary staff of types. and summarization, scientists and engineers with proven expertise in surface and ground Application~ of these models include: Geochemical Models water modeling. Our models for IT's geochemists, soil scientists, and Simulation of ground water flow · Definition of ground water flow chemists provide experience and and contaminant transport are ,~ · rates, directions, and interactions expertise in the areas of geochemic, al instrumental in defining Cleanup ................... ~wi/th surface_ water_ evaluations, ~'~"full-rc~n~e b'f ....... options and environmental impacts. · Analysis o! well pumping tests modeling capabilities. Concentrations We apply a wide variety of of chemical species in solutions are · Review of contaminant sources and typically limited or controlled by hydrogeologic model types including: loading rates reactions involving complexation, · Unsaturated flow · Prediction of future extent of oxidation-reduction, dissolution- - 5 two-dimensional and 2 three- contaminant plumes and rates of precipitation, co-precipitation, and dimensional numerical models migration Modeling/Contaminant Transport, Studies. · ~.valuation of the effectiveness of · Mobile sources Our professional statisticians provide various remedial alternatives - Short term cost-effective, statistically designed sc~mple collection programs cost-effective remedial systems a minimum number of samples. including: capping, source · Long range transport. Data can undergo geostatistical and control, ground water cutoff walls, - Mainframe-based biostatistical analysis resulting in interception/injection wells, confidence-qualified concentration interceptiomJrenches, recharge of · Radi~io- dose estimates for use as input lo numerical treated w,ater, and subsurface drains. - Mainframe-based. models. IT's scientists and engineers use hydrologic models of surface water Our staff has extensive experience .... A range of sophisticated statistical transient movement of thermal or Prevention of Significant Deterioration including: chemical pollutants. Sediment (PSD) permitting, attainment · SAS transport, flood routing, and demonstrations, emission trading · MINITAB biological decay are among the schemes, facility siting studies, and the phenomena which can be included best use of air quality monitoring · TOXIPAC in surface water models, networks. · PKIK · BOXJENK Atmospheric D~persion Models Statistical Capabilities · GAUS. IT offers its clients a group of air Interpretation of the statistical aspects quality/meteorological scientists of environmental regulations is Our experts also design Sampling whose capabilities include increasingly necessary because of a schemes and statistical procedures to atmospheric dispersion modeling, growing sophistication in the statistical determine when cleanup has been climatological studies, specification language of these requirements. In achieved and provide statistical of air quality and meteorological meeting this need, IT maintains a full descriptions of uncertainty for risk monitoring systems, source staff of analysts and statisticians with analysis. characterization and emission more than fifteen years of experience inventories. We currently use U.S. in the application o! statistical IT furnishes a total state-of-the-art · Environmental Protection Agency methodology to environmental service package in computer (EPA) guideline d~persion models as problems, modeling which runs from well as several others developed fo.r investigation and analysis through specific applications such as: Our statistical capabilities include: remediation. Our studies can include · B~sic statistics a comprehensive review of air, land, · Rural ~re~s and toxic emission regulations and - Short and long term · Regression analysis cc~n provide ~ basis for future regulatory negotiations. Our predictive - Mainframe and PC-based · Analysis of variance models offer our clients a means of · Urban areas · Explorator~ data analysis determining a cost-effective, technical solution to their - Shod and long term · Geostatistics environmental man~agemen! - Mainframe and PC-based problems. · Time series analysis · Complex terrain · Nonlinear estimation - Short and long term - Mainframe-based · Multivariate analysis. INTERNATIONAL ~r'~ ~-i-mmlo,~ -~, .-a ~. ~t~i' TECHNOLOGY International Technology/Corporation CORPORATION Co~or~e Headqua~e~ Zn~ee~g Se~ces 23456 H~thorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroe~e, PA 15146-2792 · (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 INTERNATIONAL . TECHNOLOGY "" CORPORATION Engineering Services International Technology Corporation (IT) is the premier company providing comprehensive environmental engineering design and construction services to industry and government. IT has a proven ability to generate a data base, -' develop it into a meaning/ui design; and integrate this design into efficient and cost-effective solutions to your environmental management problems. Our Company offers highly trained professionals, advanced technology, and in-depth experience nationwide. Concept to Conclusion Sometimes it is not apparent what the hazardous material problem is, how far it extends, or how to manage it. IT engineers begin w/th a conceptual design plan based on existing data and on-site investigations of the situation. The conceptual design plan defines both the problem and the process required to effect remediation. Our staff translates this information into technically feasible solutions, including our professional recommendations. We refine our client's selection into a detailed IT engineering designs have been tested through actual facilit~ construction and engineering packa~, including operation. drawings and specifications, from which actual remedial construction process capability and the latest _~.,....,, ................ remediation experts can implement aided design and drafting teChniques. ail aspects of the construction phase, Our engineers also work with IT's insuring proper interpretation and remediation group, to monitor every execution of critical design aspect Of the work. Throughout this considerations, process, a comprehensive in-house quality assurance program supports l~owledge and Experience each project, and all designs are IT has both the knowledge and the carried out in full compliance with latest equipment necessary to remedy local, state, and federal regulations, your hazardous material problem, including the requirements of the Our engineering staff consists of over Comprehensive Environmental 600highiy tr. ainedpro~essionalsfrom Response, Compensation and Liability ~35 'differentdisctplines;-fncluding civil .... Act-(CERCI.~)-and'the Re-sourCe and geotechnical engineers, Conservation and Recovery Act IT offer~ packaged "concept to hydrologists, hydrogeologists, and (RCRA). We also maintain strict in- conclusion" engineering solutions, as chemists.. We utilize state-of-the-art house and industry-wide design represented by this major hazardous integrated computer systems with rapid standards, waste vault. Engineering; Design IT engineers have completed plans fo~ a wide range of environmental situations p~oviding p~ocess design, treatment~land_dJsPosaL and other technology-based solutions. M~n¥ of our designs have been tested through actual facility construction and operation. Our engineering design capabilities include: · Containme~ activities such as cappin~- vaulting, slun~ walls, and .... gas barriers · Ground water pumping and liquid removal . ~ · Collection devices including sedimentation basins, French drains, and gas vents · Diversion structures such as grading, dikes and berms, trenches, chutes and downpipes, levees, and seepage basins · Complete or partial removal · services (excavation, dredging, and dismantling) · On-site and off-site treatment processes, including thermal destruction, solidification, and biological, chemical, and physical treatment Engineering de$i~ p~ck~e$ from IT, sucl~ ~$ neecled for th~ $1un'~ w~ll, i~clude · In situ treatment via permeable det~i.led dr~r~ing$ ~nd specifications from which ~ctu~l remecli~ construction t~kes treatment beds, bioreclamation, soft flushing, neutralization, and land farming · Temporary storage structures · Landfills and surface impoundments. .IT's design expertise is an integral part of our total capability, including sampling, analytical, remedial, and treatment services. Our engineers work closely with these other groups in meeting your environmental management needs. Because of our integrated capabilities, our engineers can offer you a packaged solution that goes from concept to conclusion. At ~T we are committed to managing your .problems today in order to create a safer tomorrow. TECHNOLOGY International Technology/Corpor~rtion CORPORATION Corpora:fie He~clqu~rter$ ~.n~t~eering Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146-2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 Thermal Technologies Innovative Technolog~ IT is at the forefront of new - ~chnolo~i~s.' ' 'Our'Hybrid Thermal' Treatment System (HTTS) offers transportable thermal treatment o! hazardous substances either to clean up contaminated sites or at the point of generation,~IT also has a license agreement with Von Roll Limited of Zurich, Switzerland, which makes us .uniquely qualified to-offerthe best ....... features of both American and European thermal treatment and associated energy recovery i . technology. ' .. ' Other areas of expertise in the field of industrial and hazardous waste thermal treatment include: 'e Waste material receiving, handling, blending, and storage of equipment · Thermal treatment - drying, combustion, and pyrolysis · £nergy recovery - conventional and special European design · Flue gas cleaning - wet or dry systems, for particulate and acid gas removal The Hybrid Thermal Treatment System (HTTS) from IT ~ a complete transportable process system which offers optimum thermal destruction of hazardous substances and · Treatment, delisting, and disposal of environmentally sa/e operation. · all liquid effluents and solid residues. IT experts design and implement a wide ~- range o! thermal technologies including International Technology Corporation mobile, transportable units and large is dedicated to the study, design, and scale, fixed facilities. improvement of thermal processes as an efficient and cost-effective method to treat hazardous waste materials. We offer years of experience, full turnkey services, and a commitment to innovative ideas. That's IT - the company that engineers solutions. TECHNOLOGY International Technolog~ Corporation CORPORATION ~ Corporate Headquarters Engineering Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146-2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 INTERNATIONAL - TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION · Engineering Services In the management of hazardous materials, land disposal is often not the preferred disposal medium. Government re~tlations and public demand have~ created a need for alternative methods which can reduce the volume of generated '-'h~,i:~d0~,fs'§ubstances and provide fbr ~- the actual destruction o! some wastes. The use of thermal destruction technology is a safe and effective way to destroy or detoxify hazardous and toxic organic materials. Breadth and Depth of Experience International Technology Corporation (IT) is a recognized leader in the design, implementation, and operation of thermal treatment systems. Our engineers and scientists bring to a proiect an impressive scope of technical expert/se and practical experience, including thermal treatment of hazardous wastes, management of thermal oxidation trial burns, and preparation of local, state, and federal permits. Our teams of experts design and implement thermal technologies ranging from mobile and transportable units t ~hr_.ough large-scale fixed facilities at inactive IT specializes in engineering thermal systems t° treat a wide spectrum of hazardous sites. Our services include the material 'including solids, liquids, tars, slud~ es, and contaminated soil. revamping of existing incineration systems and new facilities installation, evaluate and retrofit existing thermal We also design and manage the treatment systems in order to upgrade implementation of s_~mpling and Full Range of Services regulatory performance, improve anal~icat programs for use in trial IT's turnkey engineering services energy recovery efficiency, and bum plans as well as at the time of extend from initial waste increase capacity. Supporting these the test burn itself, iT has prepared characterization studies and projects are I'Fs permitting teams, over 20 trial bum plans for permitting to the preparation of a which provide the expertise necessary requirements of RCRA and ' customized process design package to obtain all required permits for participated in numerous'test and leading to final construction, start-up, hazardous waste incineration under trial burns, including PCB destruction and operation. Our expert/se has the Resource, Conservation and and removal' efficiency tests for been applied to individual waste Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Toxic compliance under RCRA and TSCA. profiles as small as 5 million Btu/hr Substances Control Act (TSCA). and to integrated multi-incinerator -~;~tern~f-Up to 270million~ Btu/hr ......... O(t~'-~-X~'~i~fJ6~d~'~f~-gineerih'~'t-~h'~ .................................................... ' .......... thermal capacity. In addition to conduct waste characterizations as an on-site fixed incineration system important part of the selection of the design, IT specialists can also best incineration system for' our clients. INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ~ CORPORATION Engineering Services International Technology Corporation (IT) offers a full range of geotechnical services for site assessments of inactive, operating, and proposed hazardous w~aste facilities and for investigations pertaining to regulatory permitting requirements. Our scientists and engineers.are highly trained- -- experts in the environmental sciences and related disciplines, including geology, hydrology, hydrogeology, geotechnical/civil engineering, and computer modeling. We have 'participated in hundreds of geotechnical in'~estigations nationwide involving characterization of surface and subsurface conditions to measure the nature and extent of contamination problems, including many investigations necessary to comply with operating or closure requirements. IT's geotechnical specialists have a demonstrated ability to evaluate an existing data base to determine the necessity for and proper extent of additional site information. We review all facts on site geologic and hydrogeologic conditions with a full understanding of state and federal regulations, and, w~mre po-~sible, Remedial alternatives are implemented based on data from comprehensive site utilize in-place systems for sample investigations taking in a wide,range of geoscienti/lc disciplines. collection in an effort to minimize sampling costs. IT's staff is supported and define hydrogeologic Our field geophysical capability is by state-of-the-art field characteristics, the installation of fully supported by state-of-the-art instrumentation, including in-house different types of monitoring wells interpretation software. drilling rigs, as well as proprietary to investigate ground water quality, data analysis techniques, and a variety of in situ aquifer test D~a Evalu~ion and Interpret~ion methodologies designed to determine A major focus of geotechnicat studies D~a Collection aquifer yield, hydraulic conductivity, is to evaluate the nature, extent, and When information is required, IT and other parameters. Our team potential environmental impacts of geoscientists define site conditions of geophysicists has practical ground, surface water, and air using a variety of field investigation experience in the application of both contamination, based on existing and and sampling methods. Our work surtace and borehole geophysical collected data; and to recommend begins with the development of a techniques for site studies. These operating changes or design clos~tre comprehensive work plan for client include the use of magnetics, plans. approval, and we implement a~ll ............... electromagnetics (EM),,__resistivity ................................... -proced~' ~'ith ~'~ull understanding ground penetrating radar (GPI~), and of U.S. EPA-mandated techniques to seismic refraction. Borehole logging i~ ensure sample integrity. Our full range also used to define soft and rock of field activities includes soil borings ~ laYering and the extent of conductive · and d~illing to obtain soil samples contaminant plumes in ground water. T'hT~"DOI~T ~ '1'T~"~'hT ~ T fr~'D~"~T..T'I~T~"~T ~tq_v ~"~"~1'~0~'"~0 ~ m?~'~x? ~ · ~" ~ ~" ~ Geotechnical Services Our staff of geoscientists has in-depth experience using a variety of techniques 'to assist this process including: · Preparation of ground water contour and contaminant isopach maps · Preparation ~ boring logs and test pit logs , ~ · Preparation of geologic cross-sections .... · 'correlatic)n~of-field observations and analytical data with past surficial land use or underground site activities · Delineation of contaminant plumes ·Characterization of contaminants and wastes ·Air dispersion contaminant characterization ·Surface .and ground water quality ~ and flow characterization. We also use computer simulation of the hydrogeologic system, surface hydrologY, and air d~persion to effectively interpret data generated during field investigations and to make predictions about the rate and direction of potential contaminant Soil borings are exa~r~ecl to determine hydrogeologic characterf~tics, and to define migration. Such studies are utilized by and rock laTering anti the extent of conductive contaminant plumes in ~ound water. IT's engineering and remediation groups in designing and projecting Geotechnical studies focus on the any needed operating changes evaluation of the nature, extent, and and/or developing closure plans at' potential environmental impacts of particular sites. IT's geotechnical staff ground, surface, and air contamination. /S expert in field data-gathering and evaluation, In'conjunction with IT's analytical and remediation groups, our geotechnical specialists can rapidly and accurately process and evaluate data and produce a report which is suitable for client requirements. TECHNOLOGY International Technology Corporation CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters Engineering Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146-2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 333-7-86 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ~" CORPORATION · Engineering Services International Technology Corporation (IT) is the nation's leading ~ 'i environmental management company providing a comprehensive range of fully~integrated services. With more than 35 offices and over 2000 qualified' professionals nationwide, IT has demonstrated capabilities ....... ranging from initial problem assessments to ultimate remediation and decontamination of situations involving hazardous substances. Our high quality of work and turnkey approach will assure successful resolution of your environmental problems. IT offers its services through five business groups: Risk Control Services · Experience in environmental audits · Risk analysis and health effects assessment expertise · Design and implementation of risk . control training programs and Risk Control specialists provide 24-hour nationwide emergency response when to~ic industrial hygiene/safety programs release incidents do occur. · Risk control planning services. Engineering Services ~'~- · Experience with hundreds of Anal~ical Services remedial investigations and · Network of EPA and feasibility studies at hazardous AIHA-approved laboratory facilities waste sites nationwide · Fully integrated permitting and · Largest commercial laboratory facility closure capabilities plus analysis capacity in the U.S. in-depth knowledge of compliance 'requirements · Mobile laboratories, field sampling, · Comprehensive radioactive waste and analytical project management capabilities, management expert/se to meet including mixed waste on-site needs management · Highly specialized services · Superior drilling and well-injection including radiochemical and engineering services . IT Analytical Se~ices provide the . high*hazard analyses, bioassay, · Experience with design and lndustw's most comprehensive net~o,k geotechnical testing, method ..................... implementation of geotechnical ............. of EPA and AIHA;al~proved'lab0rat~W developi:n~ht,-and industrial and thermal destruction lacilities. hygiene services technologies for the containment · Strictly maintained and fully and destruction of hazardous documented quality assurance and substances control programs required to · State-of-the-art project ensure the validity of test results, management capabilities. Environmental Management Services .' Decontamination and Remedial Services · Comprehensive cleanup and waste containment'construction activities, and chemical decontamination services · .24-hour emergency response capabilities n~ationwide · Extensive low-level radioactive waste decontamination and ~ decommi~ioning services = · Natior~wide mObile technologY (MOT£CH) service for on-site waste minimization, including volume reduction and treatment. ~: -. Transportation. Treatment. and Disposal Services · Modern, RCRA-certified facilities located in the western U.S. International Technology Corporation offers integrated environmental management services when and where you need them. Our unique combination o! innovative, technology-based solutions, together with the stability of over fifty years' experience in hazardous waste management, provides answers International Technology engineers solutions and 'then implements them. This remedial to difficult and challenging plan called for installation ot a recove~ and treatment system and an adjacent pipeline environmental problems. That's IT - to isolate pure ground water from contam!r~ated soil. creating a safer tomorrow today at a woodtreating facility. (Far right) ITs California treatment and disposal facilities are undergoing a site improvement program to assure compliance with all regulator~ requirements. INTERNATIONAL- .................. For~more in/onnationple~se contact: ....................................... W .......... ~ .... TECHNOLOGY International TechnologT Corporation CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters Engineering Services 23456 Hawthorne Boulevard 2790 Mosside Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Monroeville, PA 15146~2792 (213) 378-9933 (412) 243-3230 329-7-8~ · ~ ' :~'.:? ~ . ~,~..-w ~ .'* ~. _~ ~ ' '. ;' ;' ' ', *~ · ..... ~ . J:' *'. "; * ." ," '" :.';,~ *'?: x,i,. ..... ~ *, *,~' : , ' . ~ ~ Li ", , 'PR~ TMiNASY SITE C~R. ACTERIZAOON] C.E. ,~TCO FACILITY '~5~ P~RCE ROAD KRA.ZAN."' & ASSOCIATES, IN C. ~,ompaction Testing .~.. ~ngineered Septic Systems ~ ~ ~_ ~t ~11 il t~ i Construction Testing ~ ~ ~ ~ / /~ ~eotechnical Investigations ,/ .... -Bakersfield~ California tn accordance with your request, we have completed an Preliminary Site CharaCterization [nvestigati'on for the above-referenced site. The results of our prelimanary survey are presented in the attached report. [f you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contac~ our office. Respectfully Submitted, NRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3effrey S. ~almer [nvironmental S ecialist. Michael R. Erwin GOotechnical ME/OSP/ko .:.. RCE #18625 Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805). 393-2343 [] Visa/ia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (20g) 383-3993 ,PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION INVESTIGATION -~' ' ' '~ .... '"C.E. NATCO FACILITY '?. ................. ~ ............ -4550 PIERCE-ROAD ........ ' ' '" '' ........ "'~AI~ERSF'IEL['),_...... _____ CALIFORNIA ? .>.',. ,... -}, ' ,- ' f .'~ /:' . 4," ..... Project No. EB7-01B · .. _~ ' : April 13, 1987 prepared Tot C.E. Narco P.O. Box'I59~ Bakersfield, CA 9~02 Project No. E87-018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ! Im ..,. SITE HISTORY 1 ~' ~ PURPOSE ' 2 --:.~,c'e~'SCOPE & METHODOLOGY SOIL~ PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS I 'Ground Water Conditions 4 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS 4 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS - REMEDIAL OR MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES 5 ' LIMITATIONS 5 - -' SITE PLAN 7 i LOGS OF BORINGS Appendix A ... LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Appendix B KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, IN C. ~Ompaction Testing Engineered Septic Systems '.~. ~ ~ \ ~ ~, Construction Testing ,. ~,~1~ ~ 'April 13, 1987 Proj. No. E87-018 · ?" Bakersfield, Ca 93-302 . ._,.. -. RE: :Preliminary Site Characterization " · '4550 Pierce Road ..- Bakersfield, California "~. ..~ In accordance with your authorization~ we have completed a preliminary site characterization at the above-referenced project site. This investigation was requested by the Kern County Environmental Health Department as a result .. of contamination noted at the time of underground tank removals at the p~Oject site. SITE HISTORY It is understood that a 2,000 and 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks were removed from the C.E. Narco facility in December of 1986.' Ground water was encountered in the bottom of the tank removal excavation. Further, during the tanks removal, a broken pipeline dripped fuel onto the 10,000 gallon tank and surroundin9 soil, as well into the ground water in the bottom -of the tank removal excavation. It .is understood that at the time the spillage was noted, IT. Corporation ( .. was Contacted, and arrangements were made to remove the contaminated water. from the bottom of the excavation by means of an IT Corporation pump truck. After the 'contaminated water was pumPed from the excavation, it was transported to an appropriate disposal facility. Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 ' [] Visa/ia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 Page No. 2 .-." Proj. No. E87-018 No other information regarding the project site was available as of the time of this writing. PURPOSE ; ' ~.- It is the 'intended purpose of the investigation 'to determine if more significant contaminati, on is present at the project site than what was disclosed :at the time of the tanks removal. The scope' of the preliminary site characterization investigation was limited to two expJoratory soil borings which were advanced at either end of the previous location of the 10,000 gallon, tank which was removed from the project site. The two borings were advanced to ground water, 'with ~il samples obtained at' each boring location at ten and fifteen foot below grade depths. The soil samples' would be obtained for chemical analysis. The soil borings would then be developed into temporary ground water monitoring wells to obtain samples of ground water for chemical analysis. ~n order to accomplish the scope of Work outlined in our .l~roposals, the following methods were employed: - ~J.. Two exploratory soil borings were advanced at the project site at the north~ and south ends of the 10,000 gallon tank removal excavation site. 2. Exploratory soil borings were made by means of a Mobile Drill B-~I drilling rig. utilizing hollow-stem auger. ~ Samples were obtained from each boring at depths of 10 and 15 feet below existing grade. ~S.ampl._es.._w. ere_._maintained under..chain of..custody-and.-transported in accordance with the 'established EPA guidelines. KRAZAN & .ASSOCIATES, INC.' Page No. ...-' Proj. No. E87-018 5. Temporary ground watec monitoring wells were installed in the exploratory soil boring locations, utilizing 2 inch diameter pVC well pipe. The wells were installed for the purpose of obtaining ground water samples for chemical analysis. 6. Monitoring wells were developed prior to sampling by means of -~.~, , . -~:.:,~;~C7. One ground water sample, was obtained from each of the wells for ,;;,. ~..,,, . .. 8. 5oil and water samples were transported Lo B.C. Laboratories in Baker~field~ C~i(ornia for analysis. Soil samples were analyzed for %-.~,the presence of Benzene~ Toluene~ Xylenes~ Oil & Grease and Tot~ Volatile Hydrocarbons. Water samples were analyzed to detect the presence of Volatile Organics (EPA ~01/B02 Method). 9. For information regarding the location of the exploratory soil borings and monitoring well locations~ please refer to the site map included as drawing No; 1 of this report. SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITION5 Soil Profile A total of two exploratory soil borings were advanced at the project"site to a maximum depth of 25 feet below the existing'grade. The soil profile generally 'consisted of a fine to medium silty sand with some minor gravel to and approximate depth of 8 feet~. Below the 8 foot strata, a well graded, sand with fine gravel was encountered to the maximum depth of our exploratory soil boring, which was terminated at an approximate depth of 25 feet below the existing grade. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES~ INC. Page No. z~ .... ". Proj. No. E87-018 For more detailed information regarding subs.oils encountered in our exploratory s0il borings, please refer to the logs of borings included in Appendix "-i-Ground Water Conditions ~! .Ground water was encountered at an-approximate depth of 12' feet below ~':' . 'the existing grade in our exploratory'~s°il.,borings. A literature survey and 'discussions 'with the Kern County Water ,Agency has provided ,data which .'.'' describes the project site as being lOcated in the Northeast :1/4 of Section.'23, '' ' ~Township "29 :South, Range. 27 East. .Additionally, it is Understood from discussions with the K.C.W.A. that the proximity of the project site to the Kern River and the Calloway and. Levee canals provides for shallow ground water conditions which are prone to fluctual!e seasonally as a result of runoff. "~ The ' ground water level .at the project site is described by the K.C.W.A as being to 17 feet below grader with a regional gradient trending west/northwest. Ground water monitoring wells were sounded at time of sampling. Ground water levels were "recorded as:' MW-1 at l:~tg't~ MW-2 at ]~:~tl0" at the completion of monitoring well installation. However, numerous factors influence the fluctuation of ground water~ and evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS A total of three soil samples and two ground water samples were submitted for' analysis. Soil samples were analyzed to' detect the presence of pe_troleum constituents including Benzene, To]uene, Xy]enes~ Oil & Grease and Total Volatile Hydrocarbons~ in accordance with EPA Methods 5020/8020 dry maLter basis. Water samples were analyzed to detect the presence of. volatile organics utilizing EPA Methods ~01/IS02. The results of .all samples analyzed (water and soil), have yielded none-detected results. '. ..~. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page No. 5 .-. Proj. No. E87-018 For more specific information regarding chemical analysis of samples obtained, please refer to the laboratory data reports included in Appendix 13 of DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS .. During the course of our field investigation~ soil discoloration or fuel aroma was not noted in eith'er of the exploratory soil borings. ~,~ .... ~,- ~,*',-~' .Soil samples were obtained from the exploratory ~oil borings for ohemieal analy~i~, lh~ results of the chemical analysis of the ~oil ~ample~ ha~ yielded -'Upon completion, of the monitoring well~ an interface sample was obtained for analysis to detect the presence of free product. ~nalysis of the primary ~ample was none-detected, lhe monitorin~ well was developed 6y mean~ of bailing, then sampled, lhe result, of the chemical analysis of the ~round ~amples has yielded none-detected results. REMEDIAL OR MITIGATING ALTERNAllIVES' The results of the chemical analysis of soils and waters sampled has shown no contamination present at the depths and locations sampled. Therefore, in our opinion, no remedial or mitigating, alternatives are presented. LIMITATIONS The findings presented' in this report were based on the results of ou.r field investigation, results of chemical' analysis of soil and water' samples obtained and analyzed, and field Observations, combined with interpolation of Subsurface conditions between boring locations. Therefore, data is evident only to the degree'implied by ·comparison. of data obtained at each boring location and interpolation between the boring locations. · The exploratory soil borings were located in the field 'by either pacing or ............................. tape ....m_.easurement. :_fr_om existing~.-landmarks, ..--or--as.-:interp~eted~.fr. om.._availabie IqRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~' Page No. 6 ....." Proj. No. E87-0'18 maps, and should be considere¢ accurate only to the degree implied by the methods utilized to locate them., The alternative presented in this report was based on review of_the .re_suits ....... of chemical analysis of soil and water samples analyzed, information provided regarding. the project site and subsurface conditions encountered at the boring ' ~locations at the time of this report.' .The geotechnical data ...presented herewith is based upon professional ~. :interpretation ,. utilizin'g the ..'.,state of the art" and a degree 0f conservatism .................. (Jeerned proper as of the '~;~o~'~-'~ate''' 'it'iS not warrante~ 'that'such data cannot be suPerseded by future geotechnical or technological developments. .. · -'.' '!;':r':~'';:'-' 'If there are any questi°ns'°r if wecan be °f further assistance' pleased° ''''''''*~ ...... :'":"'¢ not;hesitate' to contact our office. ............. Respectfully Submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3effrey S. Palmer Environmental Specialist Michael R. Er~vin · Principal Engineer RCE #18625 ,. 3SP/MRE/ko 2 c plus invoice herewith 1 c Kern County Environmental Health Department Attention Amy Green KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. .~:!~,~,, :',--~ -..~, --,. ~'.¢,.!~.;.~- .. ; [ , , .... · ..... , ~-...... ..~ ~ . ~~ . . !~ ~ojecfNo .... Drawing No. Fresno Vi~lla Bakersfield LOG OF ]~ORINGS - LABORATORY TESTS Project C.E. Narco "'" E87-018 Boring No. 4550 Pierce Rd, Bakersfield DATE DRILLED: March 18, 1987 . i~FPE OF BORiNG: hollow stem auqer HOLE ELEV:. ' GROUNDWATER LEVEL: encbuntered @ 14,' LOGGED BY: RMS - 2" AsPhaltic Concrete " ~, Fine SAND {SP), light brown, damp,'drills Well Graded SAND {SW) with gravel and cobbl( - light brown, damp, drills easy BOIIO~ OF BORING Project -C.E. Nat. co' E87-018 Boring No. 45.50 .Pierce Rd, Bakersfield OA'rEDmU-£D: March 18~ 1987 'rVPEOFSOmNG: hollow stem au§er .6c~ ~v:. o~ou~wa~R[tv~c: encountered :~"~'~ "'" ~':" '?~ Fill' 'Pea Gravel'.(GP),:tan, 'damp, : drills : ,..~... ~..::.- ..... ;,.~.:., .~:.. ?..,..., .'~"~"~'~ ~,~. .... 5.-- ~ - .[ - "~ ' ' ' ' .' ?' ~ ;~"'.:' ':'" ~'~"? '"" ;~". , ~ '~'' ¥,' ~ ~' : '~ '..' "~:~"~'~ ' ' .;~;' ' ~'.. . .--'~ .~-'~'::~'. ': .. ,.: -. ,. . -..,~',.~. · ...~- . ~ell ~raded Sg~D (S~), with ~ravel and cobbles, l~h~ brown, damp, drills easy 20-- [ ..... ,. . :,..... , .,- BOTTOM OF BORING APPEXDIX 8 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS J. J. CC&IN, rEG. CHEM. ENGI. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD. CA. g3308 PHONE 327-4911 (SOIL) RA~AN ~ ASSOC. ATTN: JEFF PALMER Date of~ 8~0 N. ~WINE~Y REPORT:3-~4-8? RESNO, iCA.~~3?~ -- LAB No.:4888 ~ample Description:' PROJECT# E-87-018 ' .' :':- ~-~' ' .' ~.. DATESAMPLE; .DATE ANALYSIS MPLE'COLLECTED:' RECEIVED · LAB: COMPLETED:. ,., 3-18-87 3-1~-87 3-~-87' Minimum .Reporting o Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene pg/g ndne detected 0.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene pg/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene pg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene pg/g none detected O.lO o-Xylene ,~g/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected .0.50 Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.10 EPA I5020/80~O: DRY MATTER BASIS VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons ~resent (.C1 to C~O) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile .hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Total volatile hydrocarbon values may.be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, o~the combined total. TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The Sum total of all non-chlorinated constituerrts on this report. Analyst I. I. EC~IN. lEG. CHEM. ENGI. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93309 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL> & .ASSOC. ATTN: JEFF PALMER Date of 860 N.'WINERY REPORT:3-24-8? ~ESNO, CA. c)3726 LAB No.:A88~ le Description: PROJECT# E-87-018 . -1 ~15~ ATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS RECEIVED · LAB: 'COMPLETED: iAMPLE COLLECTED: . . z- ~ e-e7 ~- 1 ~-e7 '..~aa-e7 Minimum Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 o-Xyiene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Volatile Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected .0.50 Total Volatile Hydrocarbons .~g/g none detected 0.10 EPA 50~0/80P_0: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: Oil & Grease: 122 mg/kg VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons gresent (C1 to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Total volatile hydrocarbon values' may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, or the combined total. TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum .total of all non-chlorinated constituents on this report -- -,- , ~ Analyst LABORATORIES J. J. EGI. IN, REG. CHEM. ENGL PETROLEUM MAIN OF~IGE: 4100 PIERGE FIOAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. g3308 PHONE 327.4911 (SOIL) [ RAZAN & ASSOC. ATTN: JEFF PALMER Date of. 840 N. WINERY REPORT:3-24-8? ~ESNO~ CA.?~3?2& LAB No.:48~0 ampl'e"De~criPtion: PROJECT# E-87-018 ' ATE ~? ~. . ,_DATE .SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS AMPLE'~oLLEc+ED: ' "' RECEIVED · LAB: " COMPLETED: '.3-1B-87 · 3-19-87 3-22-8? Minimum Reporting Analyses :. Reporting constituent Units Results £~ ~:,._~, Level Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene " Hg/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene Hg/g .. none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene 'Hg/g hone detected 0.10 Volatile Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 0.50 Total Volatile~Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 0.10 EPA 5020/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons ~resent (C! to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, or the combined total. TOTAL vOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: TNe sum total of all non-chlorinated conStituents on this report. ~J. j~/g 1 i n · Analyst RATORIES J. J. EGI, IN, REG. CHEM. ENGII. PETItOLEUN MAIN OF~IGE: 4100 PIERGE ROAD~ BAKERGFIELD, GA. g3306 PHONE 327-4911 ~ PURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS , (WATER) KRAZAN'~& ASSOCIATES "~' "' '~"'~'~ Date of 3860 N. WINERY REPORT:3-31-8? LAB #:4891 .~ .ATTENTION: JEF~ PALMER .... SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE# I B-1 ', DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB ."'i..~..~ COMPLETED: , ~3-1~-87 3-1~'87 3-2?-8? TEST METHODS: EPA 601 6~2 AS ~ECEIVED BASIS "~' ~'~'c ..... MINIMUM .. ~EPORTING STORET ANALYSIS ~EPORTING CONSTITUENT ~ ~UNITS CODE RESULTS LEVEL · , .,.~..~ Benzene ug/1 3~030 none detected 0.5 Bromodichloromethane ug/1 3e101 none detected 0.5 Bromoform ug/1 3~10~ none detebted 0.5 Bromomethane ug/1 3~13 none detected 0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ug/1 3~102 none detected . 0.5 Chlorobenzene ug/1 3~301 , none detected 0.5 Chloroetha~e ug/1 3~311 none detected 0.5 2-Chloroeth¥1¥inyl ether ug/1 3A57~ none detected 1.0 Chloroform ug/1 32106 none detected 0.5 Chloromethane. ug/1 3A~18 none detected 0.5 Dibromochloromethane ug/1 3~105 none detected 0.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 3~536 none. detected ~. 0.5 1,3-DichlorObenzene ug/1 '3A566 none detected 0.5 1,~-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 3~571 none detected .~0'5 Dichlorodifluo~omethane ug/1 3~668 none detected 0.5 l~l-Dichloroethane ug/1 3~6 none detected 0.5 :l~2-Dichloroethane ug/1 3~531 none detected 0.5 1,1-Dichlo~oethene ug/1 3~501 none detected' 0.5 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ug/1 3~5~6 none detected 0.5 l~2-Dichloropropane ug/1 3A5A1 none detected 0.5 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ug/1 3A?OA none detected 0,5 ........ ~r.ans~t~,3~Di-chlo~opr. opene ~ ug/1 3A69~ none detected '0.5 · Ethyl Benzene PURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (Continued) LAB #: 4891 ~ "- · ' ?~AMPLE-DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE# I B-1 ~ .. MINIMUM · REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS . REPORTING. CONSTITUENT UNITS CODE RESULTS LEVEL Methylene Chloride ug/1 34423 none detected 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ug/1 81595 none detected 1.0 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/1 81596 none detected 1.0 1,1,2,2'Tetrachloroethane ug/1 ' ~:'34516' none detected 0.5 Tetrachloroethene ug/1 344?5 none detected 0.5 Toluene ug/1 34010 none detected 0.5 1,1~l-Trichloroethane -ug/1 34506 none detected '0.5 1,1~2-Trichloroethane ug/1 34511 none detected' 0.5 Trichloroethene ug/1 39180 none detected 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/1 34488 none detected 0.5 Vinyl Chloride ug/1 39175 none detected' 1.0 o-Xylene ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 m-Xylene ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 p-Xylene ~ ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 COMMENTS:'~rRAVEL BLANK WAS NOT TESTED A 6 RICU Z TUIIE RATORIES J. J. E~IN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. PETROLEU¥ MAIN OFFIGE: 4100 PIERGE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. 03308 PHONE 327-491 PURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (WATER) ~ Date of KRAZAN ASSOCIATES 3860-~N,~WINERY ..... · .... ~ ..... ~.i~:~i~'~ ....~.~ REPORT:3-31-8? ......... FRESNO, CA. -~37~6 ........... i~ ........... ~ .....' ........ LAB ~:48~~ ATTENTION: JEFF PALMER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE# '~ B-1 t'. ~i~.~ ~-. ~ ' DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB ~ COMPLETED: 3-1 - 7 ' TEST METHODS: EPA 601-608 AS RECEIVED BASIS MINIMUM REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING· CONSTITUENT · UNITS 'CODE RESULTS~ · LEVEL Benzene ug/1 34030 ~none detected 0.5 Bromodichlo~omethane ug/1 3~i01 none detected 0.5 Bromoform ug/l 32104 none detected 0.5 Bromomethane ug/1 34413 none detected 0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ug/1 3~10~ none detected 0.5 Chlorobenzene ug/1 34301 none detected 0.5 Chloroe~tha~e Ug/1 34311 none,detected 0.5 ~-Chloroeth¥1vinyl ether ug/1 345~& none detected 1.0 Chloroform ug/1 3~106 none detected 0.5 Chloromethane ug/1 34418 none detected 0.5 Dibromochloromethane ug/1 32105 none detected 0.5 1,~-Dichlo~obenzene ug/1 34536 none detected ~ 0.5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 34566 none detected ~.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 34571 none detected 0.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug~l 34668 none'detected 0.5 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/1 344~6 none detected ~0.5 l~-Dichloroethane ~ ug/1 34531 none detected 0.5 l,l-Dichloroethene ug/1 34501 none detected ' 0.5 trans-l~-Dichloroethene· ~ug/1 34546 none detected 0.5 1,~-Dichloropropane ug/1 34541 none detected 0.5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ' ug/1 34?04 none detected 0.5 ~·t~rans-i-~3-Dichtorop~opene ........... ugZ.1 ....... 346~ none detected 0.5 Ethyl Benzene ' ugXi ........... ~k3~i ............ ~-one~ei~E~ PURGEA~LE ORGANIC ANALYSIS ¢Continued~ SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE# 8 · ~ MINIMUM REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING CONSTITUENT UNITS CODE RESULTS LEVEL Methylene Chloride ~Ug/1 '~34423 none de~ected 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ug/1'i~ 81595 none detected 1.0 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ug/1 81596 none detected 1.0 1,1,2,2~Tetrachloroethane ug/1 34516 none detected 0.5 Tetrachloroethene Ug/1 344?5 none detected 0.5 Toluene ug/1 34010 none detected 0.5 l~l,l-Trichloroethane ug/1 34506 none detected 0.5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/1 34511 none detected 0.5 Trichloroethene ug/1 ~39180 none detected 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/1 34488 none detected 0.5 Vinyl Chloride ug/1 39175 none detected 1.0 o-Xylene' ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 m-Xylene .ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 p-Xylene ~ ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 COMMENTS: TRAVEL BLANK WAS NOT TESTED J. J..EGI. IN, REG. CHEM. ENGI. PETROLEUM MAIN OI~FIGE: 4100 PIEI:IGE ROAD, BAKEFISFIELD, GA. g3308 PHONE 327-4911 PURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS .. (WATER) KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Date of 38~0 N. WINERY * ~ "C'.~. ~'s"-;' ·~':i'?':~. ' REPORT:3-31-8? ~. '"' ' LAB #:48~3 '.FRESNO, CA. ~372~ .... '~'~TTENTION: JEFF PALMER SAMPLE .DESCRIPTION: B-~ H~O #1 ~' DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS· SAMPLE ·COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB, COMPLETED: 3-1~-87' 3-1~-87 :'-: ....... :e' .~.~ ,. ~" TEST METHODS: EPA ~01 ~0~ AS RECEIVED BASIS " MINIMUM REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING CONSTITUENT UNXTS CODE RESULTS LEVEL Benzene ut/1 3~030 none detected 0.5 Bromodichloromethane ut/1 38101 none detected 0.5 Bromoform ug/1 3~10~ none'detec'ted 025 Bromomethane. ut/1 3A~13 none detected 0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ut/1 38108 none detected. 0.5 Chlorobenzene i ug/1 3~301 none detected 0.5 Chloroethane ug/1 3A311 none detected 0.5 ~-Chloro~hylvin¥1 ether ut/1 3q576 none detected 1.0 Chloroform ut/1 38106 none detected 0.5 Chloromethane ut/1 3~18 none detected 0.5 Dibromochloromethane ug/1 38105 none.detected 0.5 1,8-Dichlo.robenzene ut/1 3A536 none detected .. 0.5 l~3-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 3q566 none detected 0.5 ..1.~qwDichlorobenzene ug/1 3A571 none detected 0.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ut/1 3~668 none detected 0.5 l'~l-Dichloroethane ug/1 3Aq~ none detected 0'.5 l~-Dichloroethane ug/1 3A531 none detected .0.5 1,1-Dichloroethene : ug/1 3A501 none detected 0.5 trans-l~-Dichloroethene ug/1 '3A5~6 none detected 0.5 l~-Dichloropropane ut/1 3A5A1 none detected 0.5 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ug/1 3A70q none detected' 0.5 trans-l~3-Dichloropropene ug/l 3~6~ none detected ' 0'.5 · ~PURGE~BLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (Continued) ,s;~iz F.SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: B-2 H20'#1 ~.~4;~~,,,~..r~¢ . ~ .~-~ ~'~ ~ ........ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ,: -. ' MINIMUM . REPORTING "~ STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING CONSTITUENT UNITS CODE RESULTS LEVEL 'Methylene Chloride .~EC'. ug/1 j 34423 none detected 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ~i.ug/1 81595 none detected 1.0 Methyl Isobut¥1 Ketone .ug/1 81596 none detected 1.0 1,1~2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/1 ~ 34516 none detected 0.5 Tetrachloroethene ug/1 344?5 none detected 0.5 Toluene ug/1 34010 none detected 0.5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane .'ug/1 34506 none detected 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/1 34511 none detected 0.5 Trichloroethene ug/1 _39180 none.detected 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/1 34488 none detected 0.5 Vinyl Chloride ug/1 39175· ndne detected 1.0 o-Xylene ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 m-Xylene. ~ ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 p-Xylene ~ ug/1 81551 none detected COMMENTS: TRAVEL BLANK WAS NOT TESTED By ~ LABORATORIES · ,- J. J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. ENGI. tYT'IlOLEUM OF~GE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 MAIN PURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (WATER) KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES Date 38&0''N. WINERY ~'~· ~/~? REPORT:3-31-8? FRESNO,' CA,-"~93726~''-~'~'?~:-'!~ ..... ~/'~ ' ......... ' LAB #:48~4 ATTENTION: ~EFF PALMER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: -2 H20 2 , ~.~..:~ . ~i~ ' .... ~'"~', '~ ~ ...... " "~ C '-~ '~3 ~' -~ DATE ANALYSIS DATE ~ATE SAMPLE SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB -:- ~- .... COMPLETED: 3-1~-87 3-1~-87 . :-~'~ ~:~ ~ ~'.3-27-87 ..... TEST METHODS: EPA ~01 ~02 AS RECEIVED BASIS · .MINIMUM REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING CONSTITUENT UNITS CODE RESULTS 'i~" LEVEL' Benzene ug/1 34030 none detected 0.5 Bromodichloromethane ug/1 32101 none detected 0.5 Bromoform ug/1 32104 none detected 0.5 Bromomethane ug/1 '34413 .none'detected 0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ug/1 32102 none detected 0.5 Chlorobenzene ug/1 34301 none detected 0.5 Chloroeth~'~ ug/1 34311 none detected 0.5 ~-Chloroethylvinyl ether ug/1 3457~ none detected. 1.0 Chloroform ug/1 3~10~ .no~e detected. 0.5 Chloromethane ug/1 34418 none detected 0.5 Dibromochloromethane ug/1 32105 none detected 0.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 3453~ none detected ~ 0.5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 345~ none detected 0.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/1 34571 none detected 0.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane Ug/1 34~8 none detected 0..5 l,l-Dichloroethane ug/1 344~ none detected 0~5 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/1 34531 none detected 0.5 1,1~Dichloroethene ug/1 34501 none detected 0.5 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ug/1 3454& none detected 0.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/1 34541 none detected 0.5 cis-l~3-Dichloropropene ug/1- 34?04 none detected' 0.5 ..... ~i~-~-l~3=-D'ichtoropropene ........ ug/'l ..............3A&~ ..... Z-~no'ne~-dete~ted .................. D.5_~ Ethyl Benzene ug/1 . 34371 none detected 0.5 PURGEABLE ORGANIC A ALYS. 'inued) '~ :,:'.- .., .. ~' .,... LAB..#- 4B~4 : ,' . ~ .:. i · - · . . , . :.' ....... ~.:,~,~' ..................... ~ ..... SAHPLE DESCRIPTIONi B-~ H~O #~ ..... ~.. .... ..------: . '~' . ' .~ ;REPORTING ~' .... STORET ...ANALYSIS ~REPORTING' CONSTITUENT ' ~"-;:~'~'"'{~:~ UNITS ~ · CODE RESULTS ?' LEVEL Methylene Chloride ...ug/1 34423 none detected 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone ' ug/1 81595 none detected ..... 1.0 ...... Methyl Isobut¥1 Ketone '~ ...... ug/1 ............ 81596 .none detected ~.1.0 l~l,2~2-Tetrachloroethane ug/1 "' '34516 none detected ~'0.5 Tetrachloroethene ug/1 --~ 344?5 none detected 0.5 '' Toluene ug/1 34010 none detected 0.5 1.,l~l-Tr.ichloroethane ug/1 34506 none detected 0.5 1,1~2-Trichloroethane ug/1 ....... 34511 none detected , 0.5 Trichloroethene ug/1 39180 none detected 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/1 ....... 34488 none detected 0.5 Vinyl Chloride ug/1 39175 none detected 1.0 o-Xylene ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 m-Xylene ug/1 81551 none detected 0.5 p-Xylene . :ug/1 '81'551 none detected 0.5 COMMENTS:~-_~RAVEL BLANK wAs NOT TESTED KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. O' s.,,, ~.~,..,,.~ ': ~~.;~ ! , ':, ~ ~ ~ , ; .... '""-'"""'"'"'~" ' /~ ~ / "l } ' ,-, :. ' DAT PA E OF 3860 ~O?.?H ~*~v ~ ~ ~ ~ PROJECT ~ ~ m ~ I ~ ~ O U ~ S~PLE NO tDATE TIME I LOCATION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '> 'g~ ~ ~ O > ~ I : ~ ,. ,.1' '1 .,. 1 ' I I I ~ - · - ~ ' ~ ; I~' I i Slg~re Signlture I Signature ...-~ 'TI~E . ' . ~I~E TI~E 'OR S~GE REQUIREMENTS como~ny / J ~ompany ~ Company t Com~ny ,,_.; RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY DATE RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED By (lab~qtory} DATE Signuur~ ~ Slgnltute Signature ~ ' Slgnlture ' . ~ , ~ . N & ASSOCIATES i' $~eclshz~d Fuel .~eeD~$ ~lu,~.. · , · . , ~.~-:' ,,, , .~ · Fr~Tan and Asso~iates~ Inc. Pre,nh. CA 9~7~6 ' (209) 29~-7337 < z z ' ~ z PRDJE~ i Z m ~]~ ~ ~~ ~ OU o~ERVAT IONS/". ...:, ~ · -' -t ': , RELINQU.HED By - DATE' R~EIV~ ~~ DATE . , R'ELINQUISHED By~-~ ~ :. DATE RECEIVED By .:-~ ~ h DATEI 'TOTAL NUMBER ::'.,..' IOF CONTAINERS TIME -~ ~, ~ TIME . . TiME . .. ,:.,....),~-. ....... m.~;,, .:?..."'4.. ~iME ~: '. ' ..~.~..' . : T~ ' SPECIAL SHIPMENT/HANDLING RELINQUISHED aY DATE i RECEIVED BY DATE RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED By Ii~b~rate~j DATE ~ :, .: . . ~;:.~,: ~:?.'..-. , . . <.,:: ... ~ - · ~lgn.tur. : Sion.tut. :: Sig~tur. , { . ' ~ TIME ' ~' TIME : TIME "' '"" . ' Prlnt~ Name ~ Prlnt~ Name . P~nted-Name Printed Name FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY '.~-::.:=::,-~-- .... -~---:---PEI~',,I'rT---# :--~O-OG--~ ....................... ENV. SENSIT'iVI~t~--'~::-~'~' ,~. ~Acttvi~y Da~e · Of Tanks Commen~s " ~, .RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN( . .. HEALTH OFFICER 2700 M Street · ' Bakersfield, Califorr~ia .. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Mailing Address: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reichard Bakersfield, California 93301 ' (805) 861-3636 ...................................................... ' Aprl.l.--.l:4, -..1988 Division of Combustion Engineering Attn: Frank Jackson P.O. Box i593 Bakersfield, California 93302 .17/.J RE: Re=oval of One-550 Gallon Underground tfaste Oil Tank ':at 4550 Pierce Road, in Bakersfield, California Dear ~lr. Jackson: This is to advise you that this depart=ent has reviewed the p~oJect results for the fuel leakage Investigation that ~as conducted at C. E. Narco, 4550 Pi.erce Road, in Bakersfield, California. 'Based upon the findings described in the report., this department is satisfied that the assess=ent is coaplete and stgntftca~nt soil contamtn, atton resulting fron~ fuel leakage' exists. Thank you for your coopet~atton tn this EnvtronmentalUHealth Specialist Hazardous ~atevials ~anage~ent P~ogras AgG/gb DISTRICT ~)FFICES (.' '~ ...... !' Contractor's Lic. ~521243 General Engineering ContracSor Well Drilling Contractor .- . .~ "..,~ . . Registered Environmental Assessor E "SWEET .... Environmental Contractor 4233 Quinn Road · '.,;' ~.....:::"'.:",-' P.O. Box 80963 B~ke~sfield, CA 93380- 0963 Telel~hone: ('805) 393-6370 , ~ "· ,.?:_... ....... i ................ March 9, 1988 · - Kern County Health Department ............ Division of Environmental Health · 1700 Flower Street '- Bakersfield, CA. 93305 .'. ~ Attn: Amy Greene Refer:Tank Removal Permit A642-05, C.E. Narco., 4550 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, CA. Dear Ms. Greene: Forwarded herewith are the laboratory test results for the preliminary assessment work which ,was done in accordance with the permit. Please note the slightly elevated test results for the total organic halogens (TOX) and for total lead. I have commenced a review of the situation in oMer to determine the source of the contaminants, the quality of the contaminants and the threat that they might pose to the emvironment, if any, and finally what mitigation might be warranted. A review of company operations in the area where the tank was.removed has indicated that a 'weedkiller', as yet Unidentified, had been used extens- ively_in the drainage area which fed into the tank excavation. The asphalt concrete surface covering ~he drainage area would virtmlly preclude any other path for .the contaminants to travel, except into the tank excavation. There was evidence of standing water in the excavation when the tank was removed. ~The Company representative is attempting to get the MSDS shee~s for the 'weedkiller' and the chemical makeup of the material can then be compared with the contaminant from the ground. You will be'advised of th? findings prior to any remedial work. ATTACHMENT SMC Laborator,~ Analytical~ Chemistry ~1~,~ Pegasu~ Drive Bakersfield, CA 93380 (805) 593-3597 ' : C1 ien~ Name: George Sweet . ....',, .'>.:... ,W..¢. ~..<'¥ .... ,-'....-.~ ..... -, . Address .. : P.O. Box 80965~ . ¢ ";"w:"~.,.; :':?.J-,~.~.;-.:~',%:~;:~::.¢,:¢': ,;.,'.,4 ~4~,~;::.~ :" 'Da~e sample received ...: 2-29-88 'Date":o~..'.'report , .-' '. ' s-oe-ae - · Laboratory No. 412 and 4t3 Project No, ~642-05 --"" '- ':'' ' Project Name: C.E. Nat~o '- :,~;2~:':"-:-?: "::-":'-'- ,. '-:" ' · %4E/~;,.,,;~...*¢,;RESULTS OF .ANALYSIS . .'.-... '-...;, . .' :' - ..... ':7;~,.'f¢,?~?:~412 ;?.:ID: 1A-2 .' · ugm/gm MRL,ugm/gm ". ' · --:,,;':,: :-2~¢~: .=!O , ,,: .,- .. = . 57 9 20 ,'.,.¢:<:~:..':..,,Oz: .& .Grea~e . ND 50 .- ..... , . . :..,,.: .::: .-'.-..; ... - '"' ..... ..:"' 'Total l~ad 8.14 (mg/kg) '¢41 '~ ID: 1A-6 ugm/gm MRL, ugm/gm ~' .... .:..i: .... TO X 50.5 20 "' "'""Oil &. Grease ND 50 TOtal lead 10 1 (mg/kg)' ; - ................... )~,.. :........: - COPY . ugm/gm = microgram per gram rog/kg = milligram per kilogram MRL = Minimum Reporting Level .. .. TOX = Total Organic Halogen' ND =' Not detected ." Method of Analysis for TOX: 600/4'84 d08 Method of Analysis'for Oil & Grease: EPA 9071 Total lead Analysis done by BC Laboratories, Inc. Sa. No. D~t~ Tim ~ ~ .~ . $/sl~n'Lml~n Containers ~ ~ · . Rem~k~ ,. ~. ... n. ~2/29 /~ X Center~ine O 2' . · / .,, X , .: .~,'-~ ~ ~t~ . .,,:, ~ 2/29'/~ X Centerline 0 6' / .X_ ...... ~ ~7oo mower Street -". KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 .... Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION . ...... DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ":. . · ' .,**' Vernon S. Reichard . ~.',.:, 21'?:,;:~?> Facility Name . ' ' .' ". "'-"' ::" ............ : '~';"*" Kern County ~permit # ,, .::~: ,. ~,:, '' .'..,:~,~.~..,.~--,.: * * UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION T~CKING R~CORD * "-'/'~:-:~:: .:~r.~.,.,.,= ,,,~ < ~~ to be returned to :the -Kern ~County'-Heal~h Dep~ :...,,.:-..;.. <.:~..'. days .o~ acceptance ;...:::i':i~.';-~;q;:?;:b01der "'~ the ""Perait'~lt~"'~mber ::'~oted ":~bovehls responsi I::' -~'t ., ?' ..:': > that this for= ts completed and."returned..>:,t :;,t~.:~:~: :: '. :'.--~:'~:?. t" ,: k2,~-+. ,' ... . ~: . . ' . .., ._:- .... ~...~.~:. ~.~... : ~.~ ;':'~.~ .: · :.::.. v . . , 5:,< ~ I'.. :' '.': . . ."'7'.":..' .' .'. ':' :"~[ :.:':' ':' ;?:':;::<'? <:"-'"?" '.' ~":": ::".' · .". :"?' ..... .----..-.--".- section 1 - T~ b~ .fllle~ out~ tank removal contractor: Tan'k -.. aemoval Contractor:. ~or~e S~e t,' ~viro~ental ' ' ~ontractor t<.' .... .-.."- "' ' P o'n b3 "' ':.' -"'". '. '"~.'.".'-.:Address ' P- O. Box 80963 ..v.:. .... : ...... .. " ' e,80 93'6370 "-' ~:~':'~"" ~~ ~,~__~_ Zip 93308 - Date Tanks Removed ~-~--~ No. of Tanks' 1 Se~ioa ~ - To be filled out ~ contractor "deconta~tnating" tank(s): ':-' '.~ · :. ' Tank "Decontamlna~io~" Contractor ~e~ % ~ ~ ~% ' Address ~ ~,~ ~ ' ' Phone *Z~~q~ _ " ~ ~C~,~ ~0~ ~. " Zip' ~ ' ..~ ... [.. ~ ' .. ,. ' Authorl~_ed representative of contractor certifies by si~i,ng below that tank(s) have been decontaminated fn accordance .wfth Ke~n County Health , ~-~ Department requirements. · ..- -.. '.:,:..,:., .; ].:: ature , Title ~ . Section 3, - To be filled out ~ad signed ~ a~ authorized representative of the ............... : .... ::_; treatment storage or disposal facility accepting tank(s): " Facility Name .~~ & ~~ ~c.' '1 ":'. ..... :'- ..... ' .... "" '-~,,,,. x . Address ':1620 W. 16~' St. Phone = ,,.....~ . ~_ _,,.,__~9 ~a~, ~ 90813 Zip 90813 Date So. of Tanks 1 .;'~ ...... .... . (Tank~~.~~ , / (Sure, zed Representative) ., · * * ~I'LING INSTRUCTIONS: Fold In half and staple. Postage and mailing label have already been affixed to outside for your convenience. O[ST~ O~[CES '. uj~rj'j-ij.f ~ Ii l II, - ' . WILMINGTON SALVAGE INC. 21~3 E. ANAHEIM WILMINGTON, CALIFORNIA 90,7~44 PHONES {213) 435-4555 / 436-~54= Crosby & Overton.Inc- ~'~' ~ 4' ~g88 I~,) ...: 11791 Mon~rch.~ Stree~ ~ .Oo~,,,, ~,~ ~1. I Garden.'.Grove, Calif. 92641 .. Attention~ ~- Date: Z-~g~ ~ Th~s ~s to Conf~rm that we have cut and destroyed the above referanced ~tens. Thank You :.~ ~': :.St~,~e of California---Health and Welfare Agency · ,~IL. · " '" ":" ¥ :": ":' !' 'i' · .- .' ": .Oepartment of Health Servlce~, iNIFORMHAZARDOUS.. ,:~.........-~ensratoi"s US EPA ID No. . Manifest 1 I Company Name.... ':'.' ~...~,:~ ~ . ... . Z.*' Transporter 2 Company Name: 8. US EPA ID Number :. ' .9~ Designated.FacilitY Name.and Site Address .'. 10. . . US EPA.ID Number '~':'" '" '" "'' " ' ' 'i~:~:.'~ : :'.' '... ''"' " ' ~ '~ ' .;?~:'./'.!.....".?'.:"::.:...- ..'..: ... ....... .....' ......:.:.: .,~:, ..-..--,.... . .... ....,,... :...· ..' ... :..,.... c.:' ....' :'..'.' ........ : . .'.'::.[:....'...-i~ ~ Instructions and Additional Infomtatlon , '.~. ~name a~d: are classified packed,:-ma~Eed and abeled and 'are in' all' respects in.proper 'con'dit~on.~for transpo~ 'bY highwaY, a~o~ing.to.~p i · ..~'..."lf.J. am"a.'large~quantity.generator, I ce~i~ that'l have a pro,ram in place to reduce the volume and toxiciiY.~f ~aste generated'tO ~e.'degre~'J : ..-.: determined to'be economically predicable and that I ~ve selected the practicable method ~f treatment,..storage or diaposal.'cu~ent~ available.to.' :. ~: "me: wh cb. minimizes the. present and :'future threat to human health and .the .environment; OR;' if~:i ~m a:. Smell':quantity generator, I ~ve. made a 'goOd· '..: ' :':'faith' effod tOm n m ze my Waste genstar on and select the best:waste management method:that is available :to me and that I ~n.afford. 20; Facility .Owner or Operator Ce~ification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this man feat except as noted:in.item 19,"........'.:'.-.:-. · -:- .:" ' :::, · ......'. (Rev. 9-86) ' Previous editions'are obsolete. '"' YELLOW: GENEEATO~ RETAINS - ' . . ': '"'" ' ~ ': ..... "- Job No~.. -! -~'~ i~ !' ,~t,*~ Job De'scription: ~ . ' ~. ~. ~/~ ~ ~.,~ ; . . :,. i . .:,, I P roduc t ~$F~ 0;~ ' 'Tank (' ..-%.. - ~ ~' ' ~-' ~""; -- '""," ....... :~;~-'V - .. ~.O~, ', '. ' - ' ,-:'~t,t~'.. ~ ~ : ;::?~%t4'. ,4':;~ T:Z,¢ ~;.f'33¢~4~;~},':,':: ~-;,' , ,%~-. , ELEVATION ~IEW ' x:..~C." ,?~ ~ ::~?..;.;~%:,::~[?~,:~: ~,g%~S~.~?END· VIEW'*~:~. '¢ :'m',:tv .. , " ': 5<':' .- ' :.Y.:-.~ ~.'-5~(:,i~.~ ',".} g. ?.~"~.:':~" . · ,i '- ' - Locationih .,, Mete~ Reading '.'::."' .' ';t'."?.7~' "~.?':'-."'.: ',' '~ ~ Z'~ '" Tank ' ' .. '.."-., :.~. :-' .%-,' , .,'~L. A ~ 7o ~ 7~ ' '.' -' .' -C'.. /.;.:i. GEORGE 4WEEI_" · '-'h. i4..' ~ ~ ~i:'. ::"-- ~ · ~1~ / ' ', -1~'~~-~ o/_. ' .; ':..-~:v:. Enwronmental Contractor ~ ~. . ~,. '~- . 42~ QuJnn'Road · ' ~" Ba~emfield: CA 93380 - 0963 · . * '-.!.~ ~ . . ' ->r~.~ ...~. .- k"'RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME',,'f I ~'-~ 1700 Flower Street.. ' ' AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D. · Director of Public Health :' ':.Bakersfield'calif°rnia93305-4198 .~ :z',~' ,. ,.= ': ,. ~: ?~ Air Pollution Control Officer' · ,~-~. , ' '.-'...iilTelephone (805) 861-3621 ' '" " ' '/xf~]l~ * ~"~'':: :' ~;*~''**' '~ *: ~ ~ ' ~':'~'¥'~ ~ *~: '"' ...... ~ '~' '~ .... ...- .;=*:. · _-,~ · ~;.:. ,:., ',-:,: SUBST~CES STOOGE FACILI~ · ' .... ~:?~:'~::g(~:~?*~*:C,E, Natco .... *. ' -..:. .. '. '.'.Division 'of Combustion Eng, George :'. '~".:;~i::-.:.~'~'~,~:~4550 Pierce 'Road ~/:'~'::~-.',,~.;:::,~:F~(~;?~:4550 Pierce 'Road '*~ '~'c'~'~'~"~ ~~*~ ~i ' " "'~ ': '*:"? "'(* ~':: '*~'*:'"'* '"* ': ~ :" ,2~' - ' ~::';~t~:?'*,':~-c'';'?'-~. ~ .',,-~:: ,"~ :-' -' ~,~'~ .'~,*~)'~/~':~.~-~,.:~.:~.," ~*~ ~ :"~-.~:,. ,L ~.* . ~ Phone ~(805) 325-4116 Phone"*~(805) 393-63~0 " .... :'" "" ·License No. 5211243 .,,..~'> *..:.,.,;'..~ ...... ,.. . . . -, . . , _ .. . . , , .,...,[:,::~,.. .- .:,.'~,: I TANK(S) AT ABOVE :* :: APPROVAL DATE Feb~ua~ LOCATION. APPROVED BY .:' ~ ':~F' :~. · . ' POST 0N PREMISES ...... .. '":~:' :' ::,'~:.~ ;:(: '{':.;" :*?'.j.".":J~f':.' , . ...?,:..,... :.; '*... ;.. CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW: 1. A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County '" Fir · ' Department. Pe~mittee must notifg the County Fire Department at (805)861 .. 2577 t'wo working days ~r~or, to tank removal to arrange~::~t'for "require inspectiOn(s) . ~ 2. Tank closure activities ~ust be per Ke~'n County Health and Fire Depa~t~en approved methods as described in Handout ~UT-30. * , :..:..;.L.?.-. ~:.~ '. 3. A ~inJ~um of t~o samples '~ust 'be ~et~ieved beneath the cente~ of.;:.~.he.tan~ at depths Of approximately t~o feet and slx feet. ,.. -" 4. Ail samples must be amalyzed fo~ total o~ganlc halides, ill and g~ease and lead. 5. If any contractors othe~ than those listed on pe~it and pe~lt appllcatlo ' a~e to be utilized, pvio~ approval must be g~an~ed by the specialist 1. tare, ~. on the pe=~t ' : ......... .-6" Copies of t~anspo~tatton ~ani~ests ~ust be submitted Department ~ithin five days ~of ~aste disposal. ~ ..... ~.. All applicable state la~s ~ov hazardous ~aste disposal, t~anspo~tatlon, o t~eat~ent ~ust 'be adhered to. The Kern County Health Depafft~ent must b notified before ~ovlng and/o~ disposing of any contaainated soil .... PER,fIT JFOR pERMANENT CLOSURE ':."SUBSTANCES ,..STORAGE D~lSI'O~ DP E~VIRO~MENTA~ IIEALTII A~P~ICATION D APPT~ · CA'I'I ON I~OR I~T~RMI '1' FOR PERMANENT CLO$ URE/ABANDONMEN~' OF [IAZARDOU$ SUBS~'ANC ES STORAge ~ACI L~TY ~ REMOVAL, OR ~ 'ABANDONMENT Jg PbACg (~ILL OUT ~ APPLI~TION PER APPLI~TION FOR PROJECT CONTACT ]PIIONg, Jsec/v/n (RURAL LOCATIONS ONLY} Frank E. JACKSON [ ~,~,,TS- NATC0~ 4550 Pierce Rd., Bakersfield, CA .US Hw~ 204 CE D~v~on of Combustion ~n~Sn**rin~ ~e'as a~ove . , ~ (.805, )325-~146 TANR R~0VA~ CONT~TOR ~DRgSS ~PI{0Ng George '~ ]P.O. Box 80963, BakersfSeld 93380~ /~.{805 )393 PRBLI~INARY Sing ~SE$SMgNT CONT~CTOR ADDRESS PIION~ ". ~.. J~Geo~ge S~ :~-,~;.~.. ..... . . ~ ........ P.0.. Box 80963,. Bakersfield 93380 ,, (805)393-6370 ~. ~ ...... 1011703-87 ... .,~ ...... ~ State Fund ~'~{805 >836 O0. I~DO~TORY TIIAT WILL ~ALYZe S~PLES ~DDRESS PIIONE S~C Labor~ca:or7 3155 pegasus Rd, Bakersfield .-('805 ~393 -3597 CHEHI~L COHPOSITION O~ ~TERIA~ S~RED *ANK · VOL~B CliniCAL S~RED (NON-CO~ERCIAL NAMB) ~'~*'-~/DATES ~RBD ~CIIEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED I ~5~ ~llons W~.~ n~l ....... 1076 TO l~R4 nn ~h~r ~h~m~l~ ~ATER TO'.PACILI~ PROVIDED BY IDgPTil TO GROUNDWATER California Water Service Company via water main [15' ~ ~ ~EAREST WATER WELL - GIVE DIST~Cg ~O DESCRIDK TyPE I~ WITIIlN 600 ~EET~sisNOneF0a ~thinsolL TVPS ~O500GROUNDWAT~feet ~e~K DETERMINATION IHydrolosic'S°z~ ~Ps AT ~AClLITV High Infiltrati°nsoil.. ~omplex..~ - "A".. '. ~' Kern 'County Hydrologic Soils Map / Kern County Water Agency and adjacent excavation, ~ 2 ~ Oil & ~rease, Total Halogenated Organics, Lead / ~.80.. DEScRIeS ilOW RESIDUE IN TANK(S) ~D PIPINO IS TO es ne.oveD ~No DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION ~D DISPOSAL -~ Residue, product lines & Tanks shipped via Crosby & Overton Transport to Lone. Beach. DESCRIBE MOTel TItS DISPOSAl. METIIOD AND DISPOSAL LOCATION ~OR: ~(e) Tanks will be cleaned to specified requirements, certified clean~, then ventilated and shipped Co Wilmington Salvage for demolition. Certificate of demolition will PIPINO be provided. Ail ~ept product lines to class 3 disposal site'. S~A*U~ ~~_' ~W~ET ' T~ e ' Contracggr '" ' ' .................. ~ .... ? ...... ~._% .................................... [ ......................... _ ._ 0~T~ F~bruary' 8. 1988 (Form ' 17~Flower Street '' KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT' HEAL~ OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebe~son, M.D, ~lephone (~5) 861-3636 ENVlRONMEN~L HEAL~ DIVISION DIRECTOR OF EN~RONMENTAL H~L~ ~mon · Reicha~ ~ ,? Hatch 13, 1987 C. -g. Narco P 0 Box 1593 Bakersfield, California 93302 Attn: Chris Lyons RE: Diesel Contaminated Soil and the Site Characterization Proposal Dear Hr. Lyons: On Hatch' 10, 1987 a representative of this department net with you and Jeff Palmer of Krazan and Associates to discuss the Site Characterization Proposal for your facility on Pierce Road. In BakersfieZd, California. The following topics wer'e discussed: ~. The Site Characterization Proposal presented to the Health Department. a. The Kern County Health Department suggested that the assessment for this site 'be deslgned using a plan that la - more cost efficient for the following reasons: -" 1. The amount of fuel known to be released into -the environment ~as mlnimal and was followed by correctt've actions, ~hlch Involved vacuuming water contaminated with diesel, and removlng some dlesel contaminated soil from the excavation. 2. C.E. Narco, via Chrls Lyons, has stated that this company will not be able to cover the expenses of the plan, as ~ritten. . 3. The number of monitoring ~ells proposed tn the Site Characterization plan seemed an excessive number for the initial evaluation of the site, knowing the circumstances surrounding the abandonment. March 13, 1987 Page 2 b. 3elf Palmer agreed that an adequate evaluation of the area might be performed uti.lizing two soil borings. (One north, tanks.) c. After discussions of the site were complete, the following ;~. plan was agreed upon, as being adequate. .:,i a. The site will be assessed utilizing two borings. :.~? One will be placed north of the underground tank area~ and the other will be south. .Two soil samples .................................... wlll'"be--retrieved -from--each,.boring (_One a,t..tO' 'and the other at 15' below grade). Both borings will then be turned Into temporary monitoring wells. 'One good water sample will be retrieved .from each monitoring well. The monitoring well will ,then be destroyed. 2. Permitting of the monitoring wells A. The monitoring wells, established for .the sole purpose of retrieving these water samples, are not required to be permitted by the Kern County Health Department. They must however, be closed in the following manner. 1. Clean Backfill must be used to fill the hole 2. The last two to three feet of fill must be either neat cement or bentonite. The changes suggested in the meeting must be presented to the Kern County Health Department in the form of a proposal, before work may begin at the site. Please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636, If you have any questions. : Sincerely, Envtronm~ftal Heal.~-~ffpeclalist Hazardous Materials Nanagement Program AEG:sw cc: Jeff Palmer "KRAZAN & ASSO"CIATES Specialized Fuel Seepage Studies Laboratory Soils Testing Soils Engineering ~X.V. ~ \ / //'7.~' Geotechnical Investiflations March Il, 1987 Pro/. No. ES7-0tg -'~- C.E. Natco .................... P.O. Box 1~93 '- ......................................... Bakersfield, California 93302 - - .- '. . RE: Addendum to Proposal Dated February .~, 1997 4530 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California ' Gentlemen, In accordance with your request, we have prepared this addendum to the above referenced proposal. This addendum was requested after discussing the initial PrOPOSal in a meeting at the Kern County Health Department on March t0, 1987. Those in attendance at the meeting were Amy Green of the Kern County Health Department, Chris Lyons of C.E. Narco and 3affray Palmer of '.Krazan. & Associates, Inc. Upon review of the initiat proposal submitted, it was decided by the Health Department that the scope of the investigation be reduced to encompass the area .immediately adjacent.to the 10,000 gallon underground fuel tank that had been removed from the C.E.. Narco facility, in Bakersfield, California. Discussions with the involved parties yeilded an alternate plan which would include two exploratory soil borings at either end of the tank in question. ~These borings would be advanced to a maximum depth of 20 feet below existing grade. Samples would be obtained from each boring at depths of l0 and 15 feet below grade. A temporary monitoring/sampling well would be installed at each location and be developed for the purpose of obtaining ground water samples. The soil and ground water samples woUld be analyzed for the presence of petroleum constituents as stated in our previous proposal. ......... __At the culminatign of samp. ling. of~_the .two ..wells~_~it. is understood that .t. he wells wOuld be abandoned in accordance with the criteria established by the Kern County Environmental Health Department. Main Office: Fresno / Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 832-8909 [] Visalia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993 -' Page No. 2 · Pro]. No. E87-018 All procedures and protocol P. resented in our initial proposal would remain It is anticipated that the field portion of the investigation would take approximately 2 days. After results of the chemical analysis have been received, · a~report would be prepared, and would be available for review about three · '~eeks after the completion of the field portion of the investigation. ' 'L~' ,', If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. .. ...... . .¥_....,. '~ ' ' :.RespectfuLly' '~ '~"' ':" .......... ":"" ~:'"":' ' ....... ".' .. "": ' '~ "':"" '. Submitted, ,,,.. ........ KRAZAN '& ASS~ATES .~'~ '." Jeffrey S. Palmer Environmental Specialist Micheal R. Erwin Principal Engineer RCE #18625 MRE/JSP/ko I c herewith I c Kern County Health Department Attention: Amy Green KRAZAN & AR~,OCIATFC~ INF' " KRAZAN" ASSOCIA'I'ES, INC. Soils Engineering Compaction Testing Engineered Septic Systems \ k \ ~W~ !~] ~ ) Construction Testing ~,~nt~r_hnic~l Inv~stioations .... i. February 5, 1987 · 'iC.E. Natco .... P.O. Box 1 93 . :; ...... L_.-_ -__. __ __Rakersfield, Ca 93302 Attention: Chris Lyons ..... ¥,i..:'i:.":,~:/.:'.:',;i..::" '. RE: Site Characterization 'Proposal #550 Pierce Road Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: ' In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for a site characterization investigation at the above-referenced project site. This site characterization has been requested .by the Kern County Health Department~ as a results of chemical analysis from soil samples obtained from beneath the 'tanks during removal had detected contamination. SITE HISTORY It is understood that a 2~000 and 10,000 gallon underground' fuel storage tanks were removed from the C.E. Narco facility on December 19, 1986. Ground .. water was encountered in the tank excavation while exposing· the tanks for removal. Further~ during the tank removal, a broken pipeline dripped diesel fuel onto the 10,000 gallon tank and surrounding soil, and into the ground water in the excavation site. At this time~ it is understood that IT Corporation was contacted~' and arrangements were made to remove the contaminated water from the bottom of the excavation by means of an IT 'Corporation vacuum pump truck. After the .................. :~contaminated- water was pumped- from-the--excavation-~'it~ was -'then' transported to a disposal facility. Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337 Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 ~ Visa/ia (209) 625-8251 CJ Merced (2091 383-39.93 Page No. 2 Proposal 3. literature survey and-discussion with the Kern County Water 3.gency" describe the proiect site'(NE 11% SEC. 22t, T295, R27E) ground water levels as ranging from-"~-~-~-i7 feet below grade, with a regional gradient trending · : west/northwest. '" ·: '::" .,~ SCOPE · METHODOLOGY '- ..... '~ ....................... ]t is understood that the Kern County ~nvironmentai-Health Department =-~ has required that a proposal be submitted to assess the subsoils .~d ground-':; "7,-:, ' water to determine i~ there may have been a release ~rom the underground ~ue~ .?:~,?)~: storage tanks which could have impacted the ground water and-';oils';'L~':"~he'':~:'/'- project site. Additionally~ it b requested that the distribution oi contaminants be described by the investigation. In order to investigate these potentials~ the,. ~ollowing methods would be employed: '..-.: . '. . !. A preliminary soil boring would be advanced north of and immediately adjacent to the tank excavation. This boring would be advanced to a depth of 25 feet. Soil and water samples would be obtained from this exploratory hole at depths of. 15, 20 and 25 feet. These samples would be used to help determine potential impact o[ contamination at the tank burial site. ' ~ . ..... 2. A second soil boring would be advanced south o~ the tank excavation E ., ...,~.. ~,._. and north o~ the ~uei dispenser island. Samples o~ soil and ground ~ ,'...r,"'~",. ~" .... .'~ water would be obtained to help determ~e potential impact of ~. , .':".. contamination at the tank burial and product line s~te. , .~- ~,,~" ~:~ .,.,,.~. · ,,~,,. . '~,' -,,, "'-, ~:. ;~) ~; ~. A two-~ch diameter up-gradient ground water monitoring ~d ~'~ sampling well would be installed to a depth of 2~ feet. This .well ~., -~L-7" ' ' would be located approxzmately 60 ~eet east/southeast o~ the tank ,,~,,, -' ': ...... ~. -' quality water sampling. ~ . ~'-. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES~ INC. ...." Page No. 3 '" Proposal #. Two 2-inch diameter :down-gradient monitoring and sampling wells would be installed t~ a depth of 30 feet. These wells would be ~':~' ......... -~-~ ........... -~'*~:16~ated 'apProximately ~0 to' '70--feet ':west/northwest burial site~ and approximately 30 feet apart~ north to south. These · . ' wells would be advanced, installed, develoPed and sampled to '...,~' '~ determine potential down-gradient migration oi contaminants,, ground ::~. water gradient and future monitoring. . .... ,:,: _ · -.: ..i ', ...' Soil borings and monitoring/sampling wells would' be advanced by 6. Soil samples would be obtained, either by hammering a st~dard sleeve-lined penetrometer~ or by pushing stainless steel tubes (Test Method ASTM D1587-Sfi~ "Thin Wall Tube Sampling of Soils"). ' - ' 7. Samples would be sealed and stored; chain of custody procedures would be followed in accordance with EPA SW-8~6 methods. 8. Monitoring/sampling wells would be developed by means of bailing. Ground water sampling would be conducted by means of ~ Teilon bailer. 10. Drilling and sampling equipment would be cleaned between each proposed hole by means of either a hot water/high pressure spray - washer or a steam cleaner. 11, All samples would be transported to B.C. Laboratories in Bakersfield, California for analysis. Soil sample analysis would include Benzene, Toluene, Xylenes, Total Volatile Hydrocarbons and Oil & Grease. Water samples analysis would include Volatile Hydrocarbons analysis (601/602), Oil & Grease and Total Lead. ' KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES~ INC. ...- Page No. ~ ... Proposal 12.Exploratory soil borings auger cuttings and soil samples would be field screened by utilizing a photoionization detectors capable of · -- -.=-_--=: .... · ......... - ............. '-'~=--" .... 2~-+iH~-'~'n/n-til~ hvdro-carbons as-tr'ace--~-a-s; ........................ 13. Auger cuttings from the exploratory soil borings and monitoring and :~' sampling well installations would be drummed and left onsite pending ...>i,"'.:;.. ':~' results of chemical analysis. 'Upon determination of constituents' .the soil~ .appropriate measures to dispose 'of'drummed .w~te-Will.~ ...... ' ' .' ~.~--., .~-': ~i-, :' made, = . ,' .-- .... -.~ :-' '=~;~ :;=; ~':"~.' 1~,All abandoned soil borings would be back{~lled w~th a sand/cement slurry, 15. After acquisition and reduction of the field ~d laborator~.'data, a report presenting our findings would, be i~aued. Thi~ report would hclude' information regarding soil profile · subsurface condifion~ ground water data~ laboratory ~alysi~ of ~oil~ ~d waters~ engineering ~alysis of current conditions~ boring .logs ~d a ~ite plan~ as well as a discussion of potential remedial action~ and' . ~mitigating measures alternatives. Please refer to the attached site plan for proposed boring location~. We would be in a position to begin the field' portion of the investigation within seven days of your .verbal authorization. It is anticipated that the field -- portion of the investigation will take about six days. The final repor.t would be available approximately ~0 days after completion of field activities. HoweveG verbal results could be made available sooner. · KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Page No. 5 '~,. -' o Proposal ; ................ '~If-there-are-:any questions -.or- ~if-we - can-be-of-fur ther-assistance~ 'pleas~-:i do not hesitate to contact our office. '~' Respectfully Submitted, Geotechnical Ensineer 1 c Kern County Environmental Health Department ~ "~':"?":" ..... Attention: Amy Green KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1700 Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH OFFICER Bakerefleld, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Telephone (805)861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Reichard Sanuary [2, [987 C.E. Narco P. O. Box 1593 Bakersfield, California 93302. Attn: Chris Lyons Re: Assessment Requirements for Abandonment of the 2000 and 10000 gallon underground fuel tanks located at C.E. Narco 4550 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr. Lyons: On December 19, 1986, representatives from this department were called out to the O.E. Narco facility located at 4550 Pierce Road in Bakersfield,. California b~ Mr. Jackson to view the special problems'encountered during tank abandonment and provide some assistance in deciding on emergency mitigation measures and assessment requirements. The following information was obtained after viewing the abandonment site and discussing the.problems encountered with Frank Jackson at C.E. Narco, and some employees of Whitten Excavation: 1. Groundwater was encountered while exposing the 2000'and 10,000 gallon underground fuel tanks. 2. Some diesel-from a broken pipeline attached tO the lO,O00 gallon tank-dripped on the tank,, into some'surrounding soil, and into groundwater puddled below the tank. Chris Lyons - Assessment( =quirements January 12, 1987 Page Two The following activities occurred after consultation with representatives from the Health Department: 1. Frank Jackson called I.T. Corporation and arranged to.have some of the contaminated water, that was puddled below the underground tanks, vacuumed into a tanker truck, and hauled to a hazardous ,..waste facility. 2. The 10,000 gallon tank was removed and hauled away. ~ 3.' 'Samples were retrieved belo~ the-Pipeline. ' · 4. Some of the contaminated soil was removed from the side of the · excavation and placed in a pile on the ground near the excavation. C.E. Narco must still fulfill the following requirements: 1,. Submit a copy of the completed manifest obtained from the disposal -i .~ site for disposal of the contaminated water. ~ 2. Submit a proposal on how the area below the underground tanks is ~ going 'to be assessed (the plan must be designed to determined whether there was a release from the two underground tanks into the environment, and it must describe the distribution of that re~ease in groundwater supplies and in the surrounding soils). A , copy of the department's outline for a site characterization proposal is enclosed. It may be used as a guide. Your Site Characterization Proposal must be submitted 'to this department within 30 days. If you have any questions please feel free to oall me at (80§) 861- Sincerely, i ~ Health Specialist ? Hazardous Materials Management Program AEG: sw Enclosure LABORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PETflOLEUM MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics C.E. NATCO Date P.O. BOX 1593 REPORT:12-23-86 ' 'BAKERSFIELD, C~.~93302 ........................ LAB No.'~22567 Sample Description: 10' NORTH DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 12-19-86 12-19-86 12-23-86 Minimum Report lng Aha lyses Repor~t lng Co nst i tuent Units Resul ts LeYel Benzene ug/g 1.23 O. 1 Toluene ug/g 4.19 O. 1 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 6.88 0.1 p-Xylene ug/g 21 /69 O. 1 m-Xylene ug/g 35.19 O. 1 o-Xylene ug/g -57.56 O. 1 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g 16.81 0.1 TVH ug/g 1285.28 0.5 EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Oil & Grease: .437 mg/kg Comments: 10' NORTH .OF PUMPS, 2' BELOW PIPING SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS ORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 'Purgeable Aromatics C.~E~ NATCO .... ........ ~' Date of ....... , .......................... P.O. BOX 1593 REPORT:lB-83-86 BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 LAB No.:88568 Sample Description:' 10' NORTH OF PUMPS 6' BELOW PIPING DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 12-19-86 12-19-86 12-22-86 Minimum Reporting Analyses Report lng Cons t ituent Uni ts Resul ts Level Benzene ug/g none detected O. 1 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.1 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 m-Xy'~'ene ug/g none detected 0.1 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected~ 0.1 TVH ug/g none detected 0.5 EPA 5020/80~0 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Oil ~ Grease: 108 mg/kg Comments: SOIL. DRY MATTER BASIS ASRICUL TIJIIE LABORATORI CHEMICAL AI~AL Y~I~ J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PETROLEU¥ UAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE :327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics C.E. NATCO Date of P.O.*BOX 1593 REPORT:12-23-86 BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93302 *' LAB.No.:22569 ........ : ....... ~ .. Sample Description: 20' NORTH OF PUMPS 2~ BELOW PIPING ~ DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 12-19-86 12-19-86 12-22-86 Minimum Repot t ing. Ana 1 yses Repot t ing .Const i tuent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.1 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 o-Xylene ug/g none detected. 0.1 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 TVH ug/g none detected 0.5 EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Oil ~ Grease: $0 mg/Bg · Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS ,I. J. EGLIN, IIEG, CHEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics C.E. NATCO Date of P.O. BOX 1593 REPORT:12-23-86 - ,'BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93302 '~ ' LAB No.:22570 Sample Description: 20' NORTH OF PUMPS 6' BELOW PIPING DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED 8 LAB: COMPLETED: 12-19-86 12-19-86 12-22-86 Minimum Repot t lng Analyses Report lng Cons t i tuent Un i t s Resu 1 t s Leve 1 Benzene ug/g none detected 0.1 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.1 Ethyl Benzene ' ug/g none detected 0.1 p-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 1 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.1 o-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 1. Isopr'opyl Benzene ug/g none detected O. TVH , ug/g none detected 0.5 EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Oil & Grease: less than 20 mg/kg Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS J.J. Eg~in 1700 Flower Street ,.: K~, ,N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENt. HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. ' .'~ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Telephone (805) 861-3636 -. · ' DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ., CLOSURE' Per r .A3 2-05 PERMIT FOR PERMANENT SUBSTANCES ST0~GE FACILITY _ '~":~" ..... ' ?:' . · :., .. .. . · . . - · -. . . ,: -: : ~,., . ~'.~ - · ..'.,-~:,~:'?~'i,~.,'~' . . , . . ' .' : . .. ' . '~'f'.: 93302 ~'. i Permittee must obtain a Fire Department permit prior to initiating abando~ent action. · 2. .All procedures used must be in accordance with requirements of S~anuards-and 'Guidelines developed for .. implementa~ion .of Kern County Ordinance Code'.'" A copy of %hese requirements are enclosed with thi's permit. '"' 3. A minim~ of four samples must be retrieved beneath each tank at' dep~h~ of approximate.ly 2' and 6', one-third from each end. · .~ · ' 4. .:A . minim~ of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately 2' and 5. Ail 'samples retrieved beneath . the gasoline tank must be~ analyzed for Benzene, Toiuene, and Xylene and Total Petroleum' Hydrocarbons. ' " 6. Ail samples re~rieved beneath the diesel tank must be analyzed for To~al Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Benzene. , -' ...... .:-..~ '~':~"- ~ .. Advise this 'office of the time and dare'of proposed sampling with...:.'24 hours " advance notice. '. -".- ' ' -' :.~.'.....'.'.........' ' .... ~-', '?': .""' ~"; ..... "-". ACCEPTED BY DATE DISTRICT OFFICES " Delano Lamont . Lake Isabella . Mojave . Rtdgecrest Shafter . Taft 'Kern Cou[~ty He.alth L~e. pautme,~t (' Permit N~ Division of~ Env iro~nental .Heal th Appl icat ion DA'ne 1700 ~to~er Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 No. of Tanks to be Abandoned APPLICDkTIDN FOR PERMIT FOR T~:MPO~RY (AR P~E~ CLOSUP~ABANDONM~T OF ONDERGRDOND ~S St~~ 5'I~E FACILI~ i' ~ o__f A_jp~lication (Fill Out One Application Per Facility) ' [] Temporary Closure/At~andor~nen--~ ~P~eqrv%~e~nt Closure/Abandor~ent A. Project Contact (n~e, area code, phone): Days Chris tyons~.°~-~k~i~hts SAMF Facility Na~ C-5 NAIC0 Division of Combustion, Engineering, Inc. Facility .~tdress 4550 Pierce Roa0. Bakersfi. eld. CA Nearest Cross St. Airport Drive T ' R SEC (Rural Locations Only) Owner ~'/-E NATC0 - Telephone (805) 325-4146 .......... Address P. 0. Box 1593, Bakersfield, CA ......... Zip ......... 93302 Operator SAME Telephone i~dress Zip ' B. V~ater to Facility Provided by California Water ServiceDepth to Groundwater 15' Soil Characteristics at Facility Sandy Basis for Soil ~ and Ground~ter Depth. Determinations Ke~n County Wa~er District C. Tank Removal Contractor WHII-[EN EXCAVATION CA License No. 459097 ;~dress 72]7 Durango Way, Bakersfield,CA Zip 83309 Telephone 834-8002 Proposed Startir~ Date ]2/3/86 Proposed Ccmpletion Date ]2/]0/86 Worker's C~ensation Certification ~93W8389334-87 Insurer Kansas, Ci%¥ Fire & Marine Environmental 'Assessment Contractor BC Laboratories CA License No. Address 4]00 Pierce Road~ Bakersfield, CA zip 93'308' Telephone 327-491l Proposed Starting Date 12/8/86 Proposed Cc~npletion Date 12/17/86 Worker's Cc~npensation Certificat'iYn ~ Insurer D. Chemical Ccm~osition of Materials Stored Tank ~ Chemical Stored /non-co ,~e. rcial name) Dates Stored Chemical Previously Stored ' ( if different) 2000 Gal Unleaded Gasoline 1976 to Present '?~ Gal ~iesei 1976 to Present to to E. Describe Method for Retrieving Samples Coring Auger as per requirements Samples Will be AnalYzed for . Hydrocarbons~ benzene, tol~ene~ x¥1ene~ EDB Laboratory That Will Perform Analyses of Samples BC Laboratories Addr,~ss 4100 Pierce .Road~ Bakersfield~ CA Telephone' 327-4911 F. This application for: ~-~remov.al or ~-]abandonment in place * * PLF~E PROVIDE INFOP~MATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF ~%{IS SHEET BEFORE SUBMITTING APPLICATION FOR REVIEW. This form has been cOmpleted under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true ar~ correct. Provide Descriptio~ of . fsical Layout of Facility Usi~ Space Provided Below; Include All the Following Information: Location of Tank(s), Piping & Dispenser(s) ~Proposed Sampling Loc~tions Indicating Approximate Depth., of Samples '.. .. Nearest Street or Intersection Any Water Wells or Surface Waters Within 100' Radius of Facility NORTH x ............. · _' ......... --_ ......................... - .... '. I. ' BAKERSFIL .... -, CALIFORNIA '" NATCO APPROXIMATE SCALE: 9/16" = 50' C-E NATC ES i} MAN~J, FA CTU R I N G STAN DAR DS J]..o."'"":'""' '".s.-,,o.^,"" BAKERSFI~._O CA*LIFORNIA FACILITY UTILIZATION C-E NATCO BAr,[RSFI£LD REPAIR FACILITY 1 ~fl ~f~ce ~f~ ~ x ~ 1976 - 4,~ ~ Sho~ Bu~ld~na Pc~s~u~ Vessels lO0. x 1~ 197~ lO.~ ~0-~ 5. S 4 ~ra~ ~raae ~0 x lO0 1976 S-~ 5.~ - S :Fabr{atiofl S~dl Re~r ~ x ~ 1976 6 , Storaoe Shed S~raQe 14 x 85 1976 I 1_1~ 1.1~ - 7 ~soli~ P~s P~s 1976 j - - 9 S~am Pad wi~h p~ 197G - - - 10 P~ Tank, S~ra~ Z97~ 11 ~r Run~ff ~m ]~76 - - - 17 ~d~t Pad H~t~t 1~ x Z4 197~ .... I TOTALS 21 t 5~ 4 tSO0 26 t390 265,716 6.~ 26,390 sq. ft. C-E NATCO FACILITIES II'MANUFACTURING STANDARDS page MSM-110-A3 1700 Flower Street -~ ~ "I'~ERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN', HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Heberjtson, M.D. Telephone (805) 861-3636. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . Vernon S. Reichard December 1, 1986 C.E. Narco Combustion Engineering, Inc. 4550 Pierce Road Bakersfield, CA 93308' Attn: Chris Lyons . Dear Sir: This.is to'advise you that this department has reviewed the project results for the subsurface contamination investigation conducted at C.E. Natco Combustion Engineerin¢; Inc., 4550 Pierce Road, Bakersfield, California. Based upon the findings described in the report, this department is satisfied that 'the assessment is complete and no significant soil contamination remains from the fuel tank leakage at the site. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. ~azardous ~aterials ~anage~ent Program AEG:aa DISTRICT OFFICES LABORATORIES, lit-lC'. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PETI~OLEU¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 IT Corporation Date Reported: 11/20/86 P. O. Box 3345 Date Received: 11/6/86 Bakersfield, California 95585 Laboratory No.: 19805 to 19809 Attention: Duane Meadows P.O. #8754 Project #260163 Oil & Grease Total Lead Sample Description mg/kg mg/kg Soil #1 @ 2' 71. (-) 1.5 Soil #1 @ 6' 39. (-) 1.0 Soil #2 @ 2' 85. 2.9 Soil #2 @ 6' (-) 20. {-) 1.0 Soil #5 @ 2' 160. C-) 2.8 refers to "less'than". ATORIES j. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGIi. PETilOLEIJM MAIN OFFIGE: 4100 PIEFIGE ROAD,, BAKERSFIELD, GA. g3300 PHONE 327o4911 Polychlorinated Biphen¥1s (PCB) I.T. CORP.~ATT. DUANE MEADOWS Date of P.O. BOX ~3A5 REPORT:il-l?-86 BAKER~FIELD~ CA. 93385 LAB #'s:19805-19809 Test Method: EPA 8080 Type of Sample: Soil DATE/TIME DATE/TIME SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: 11-05-86 11-06-86 11-17-86 Minimum Sample Reporting Analyses Reporting Lab No. Description Units PCB# Results Level 19805 SOIL ~1 @ 2' PROJECT #260163 ug/g none none detected 1.0 19806 SOIL #1 @ 6' ug/g none none detected 1.0 19807 SOIL ~2 @ 2' ug/g none none detectbd · 1.0 19808 SOIL #2 @ 6' ug/g none qone detected 1.0 19809 SOIL ~3 @ 2' ug/g none none detected 1.0 AGR~UL TURE LABORATORIES, InC. j.j. EGLIH, REG. CHEM. ENGR. ~TROL£U¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Waste, Inc. Date ~eported: 10/21/86 P. 0. Box 3366 ~ Date ~ecelved: 10/07/86 --.--.Bakersfield, California. -93385 .... Laborator7 No.: 18154 ........................ ~--~ ........ ;~-- Attention: Marianna Buoni P.O. #2912 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample bescrip=ion: 9~ #301-1 C~ ~at~o Title 22 .............. Total Metals~ mg/kg MethOd Reference TTLO,'mg/kg Antimony 7040 1 500. Arsenic (-)' 0.78 7061 1 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead 7421 1 1000. Mercury (-) 0.20 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 752~ 1 2000. Selenium (-) 2.0 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1' 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfa.des 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 500. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8.10 ug/g* 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: Ail constituents reported above are tn m g/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers ~o "less than". *Dry basis {moisture = 47.46%) (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, JUly, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020. B C LABORATORIES, INC. 1 LABORATORIES, Inc. PETROLEUM 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELDi CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Petroleum Waste, Inc. Date Reported: 10/21/86 P. 0. BOx 3366 Date Received: 10/07/86 .Bake~sfield,.£alifornia ~_9.3385 .......... .: .... . ~ Laboratory~ No.:..____18153___. ~. ---.-~=.:-.~----~ __ _:..~:_: ...... _ Attention: Marianna Buon~ P.O. #2912 Sample Description: PWI #30i-2 CE Natco Title 22 ............ Total Metals, mg/kg .... Method Reference TTLC~ m~/k~ Antimony 7040 1 500. Arsenic (-)0.80 7061 1 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium' 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead 7421 1 1000. Mercury (-) 0~15 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel (-) 1.5 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 500. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point '1010 1 PCB's N.D.* 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: All constituents reported above are in m g/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". *N.D.: MRL = S.O ug/g dry basis (moisture=72.92%) (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemicat Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020. · B C L-~BoRATORIES,- '~C.' 1700 Flower Street .~ k-RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN!';* HEALTH OFFICER .. Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Bakersfield, California 93305 · -*' ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL'FH DIVISION Telephone (805) 861-3636 * ' ', ' - '·'- '. * '"* DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH " . Vernon S. Reichard PERMIT FOR' PERMANENT ABANDON PERMIT NUMBER A296-05 OF UNDERGROUND BAZARDOUS '.':' 'SUBST~CES STOOGE FACILI~ - , ........... ~ - ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~*d'~':~. t?' ",'?',~'~ "-. :?.~?:.?'Engineering Inc. - Engineering Inc. 2?03 Patton Way ~'c~:~?c~J~-f?4~50 Pierce Road ,-.'4B50 Pierce Road '.. ',:Bakersfield, '-.CA~98808 [ [[~'::-~d~ :?~?'..'Bakersf ield,j.. :~ ~) :..[.~, :.~:_..:.~/:~,` :,) -, "J[,~ '.~'"' ~ ...-' -~ ',.. .. '::':" Llcense:~.~ No..: ~'~C34'j:"C61":"13~42A' ::C33, , [ 'PERMIT TO ABANDON PERMIT EXPIRES October 31~ 1987 ~-: :'" ":'' ":"1 TANK AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE ''" ' '"' "~'<" "}' ' " · ~tober 31, 19~ A"?=. .' LOCATION. APPROVED BY ~ -' A~.IGtee"CC--~ ,.' .'/.:,:-.,: COnDITIOnS ~S '1.. Permittee must notify Kern County Fire Department at (805) 861-25?7 two '' working days Er!Dy/-to initiating abandonment action to arrange ,for required i.-nspect ion (s) . 2. Tank removal activities must be per Kern County P'ire Department approved methods~ as described in handout included with this permit. 3. All procedures nust be in accordance with requirements of the standards and guidelines developed for the iaplementation of Ke~n County Ordinance -- Code, ' - 4. A minimum of four samples ~ust be retrieved beneath the tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet, one-third fvoa each end. 5. Ail samples must be analyzed for otl and grease, lead, and P.C.B.s. 6. Advise this office of the tine and date of proposed saapling with 24 hours advance notice. DISTRICT OFF{CES " p[ovide De'~c[[p~iu,": o[L ~ical Layout of Facility Usin~ _~ace Provid~ ~low; . . ' ':'=- '~'"P~O~S~ S~pli~ Locatio~ Indicati~ Approximate DeP~ of Samples .......... .._~y :Water_ ~lls.. 9r. Sur.face:. Waters'Wi~in 100, .~i~ .of · Approved By Scal~ . .'-.~" ' ~of Environmental. Health Application Date' i wet Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 No of Tanks to be Abandoned APPLICATIGN- FOR PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT m~ZA~Z~US SUBSrANC~ STOm~Z Type of'A~plication (Fill Out One Application Per Facility_J)/ DT~porary Clo~ure/Abandor~me~-~ [~fPermanent Closure/Abandonment Project Contact (name, area c_ode, phone): Days Nights Facility .Name C,~z~. /t~/-~'~ ~/3u~;7~ ~/~3~6/~/~, Facility. Address _~5-J-~ ~/~- /~/ NeaFest Cross $~. ~3~?~/~ T 'R SEC [Rural Locations Cnly) ~' Addr ess ~/-/~<-~ /~ '~/2 g.~ /~-/ Zip 01perator ~,_~, z$/~ ~-//F. d/' ,/J~~ z=~'. Te!e-~hone ~zs<--3~-g-- Address ~sJ-~ /~=. ~ ~ Zip B. ~ter to Facility Provid~ by ~ ~m/~ ~z~z= ~p~ ~ Gro~dwatsr~y Soil Characteristics at Facility _C~/~/ C~'/~ ~CzzM~ .~ ~sis for ~il ~ and Gro~d~ter ~pth ~ts~inaCio~ C. Ta~ Re~val Contractor ~ ~/~. C1 Lice~e ~.,/~~-~, ~dress ~ zip ~3~ Tele~one ~-- ~rker's C~nsation Carti(ication ~ ~< ~~. Insurer Enviro~ental' As~s~ent Contractor ~ ~. ~ License NoJ3~-~. Address ~ ~./~3 ,~/ Zip f33~g Telephone ~-~-~3 . P~o~s~ Starti~ ~te /~-~A~m./~ Pro~s~ C~pletion Date ~rker's C~a~ion Certification ~ ~x ~x~. Insurer D. Ch~ical C~sition of Materials Stor~ Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~rcial name) Dates Stor~ Chemical Previously Stored . (if different) to to E. ~scri~ Meth~ for Retrievi~ S~ples /~ ~.g~ ~ ~;r D~J A ,~ ~ ~.~ S~ples Will ~ ~a]yz~ ~horatory T~t Will Perfo~ ~alyses of S~ples ~ F. This application for: ~emoval or ~a~nndo~ent in plac~ * * PLS~SE ~IDE INFO~TION REQUESTED ~ ~E SIDE OF ~HIS SHE~ B~ORE SU~4I~I~ APPLfCATI~ ~R.. ~. This form has been completed under penalty of Fei'jury and to the best of my knowledge is true ar~ correct. S i~natu~'e 'Fi tie Cate JOHN R. WIlSON, Civil Englne~r IT CORPORATION SUMP ABAND~MENT C E IT CORPORaTiON (805) 589-9~ ~'~'~ ..~ .-.. , 17OO Flower Street .' KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Bakersfield, California 93305 - · Telephone (805)861-3636" ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · ~ ~/~~ Vernon S. Relchard I NTERI M PERMIT /f~%% PERMI T~050066C ,:---.~ .... '~ :'--'--E Xi' I :i~ E's' '.~om~r~," ~.~ -- ': UNDERGROUND ltAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE$~~~ ~ STORAGE FACILITY ~ NUMBER OF TANKS= .3 FACILITY: I ONNER: · , . . -.. ~.. ~ .. ; . / :. . . '. ::.~? :': ':C. E..'NATCO . . J ' .,. C.E. NATCO ~,.:~':.,.~.:~:; ~ ....:-.:, .... ' "'""'?:'~;'?':':::.~:!~:74550 PIERCE_ ROAD ,: . '..., ': .................... J _.-.p 0 .. BOX. _!593 -. ..... :'~:- "'"'. ......... -::-~AKERS FI'ELD CA I BAKERSFIELD CA 93302 "- ':': "' :":~,, ~ ;:}-: ':?':;';i. '.:?,.:"' .-:"': :-: ':' ''? "' :':;'"" ' .... . ' ' '" '". ".,. ,:'"'~ ":':- -~ '~'''., ...', ':.': .../.,.i, ?:::..,. -.. _...~'.,~. ~ .- · " ::.':'t ?' :':*!'. :IANK # ':.':'-::'.'?AG--_E(IN YRS) SUBSTANCE CODE "' PRESSURIZED PIPING? ';~''.":':'..... ,:..:,. ":'.'. .... 1,2 ".: ' ' ..,· ' UNK MVF 1 UNK 3 'UNK NO 3 UNK ': "N'OTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING .- ,.." ":.:~. AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE * * *- POST ON PREMISES · . -, .~'.i....:....'.'. ... ~: . '~.."..i'· '... . . ~ ' ...:'.. i~ i . ?... . ...':' . .... ..'. ....:,. ... , . .~. /--.'.."':" '.~:~'. ~,.~.: !.i:'.. .i :i :' ~.~ . ~ ...... .. .... ' : .... i .~ ~i:;':"i : ·DATE PEPS.fIT CHECK LIST RETURNED: :.~ :"-~ ..... ":" .:,.'... :.....'.... '. . . . . . ......,.:... .......,.'.... : ....'... ::...~....'. .. ! ., .:. · ~!..' :..:.'...'.~.'. ::-..'"".':i "i.. .- . . "..:.. :"'::.:'..: ~'. ~. . ~ ~.':.'i." "..'~.'."' :. ':' ' ~ . ~ . ~ ' ' ' · ! .'" .' 'i ./ "'. i":,i '. ',.' .' ."-.' ' ' ',.i :.,':: :. · .. . ..~ :I :~.. ' !~ ': · .."'. ' . ' ~ · "" ',.?""" "~:..' '. ' : "' "-'~i'. .. :'~ ... ' ' .i " '~'. .......... :-~ ....... :"": ...... -'~"'~-~:" ~' .......... ' · · "-'" --: ......... : ..................... '. · Perm'i~: Oues~i onn~i re Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits. Sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. >Please fill in Permit · and check one of the following before re~urning this form with payment: · -- 050066C Pot PERMIT # 1. Send all information to Owner at the address listed on invoice (if Owner is different than Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information). X 2. Send all information to Owner at the following corrected address: 4550 PIERCE ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 MAILING ADD... P.O. BOX 1593 BAKERSFIELD,CA 93302 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit for OWner). Kern County Health ~epartment Division o[ Environmental'Health. Application Date 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Applica. tion (check): DNew Facility ['~Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility [~Transfer of Ownership A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days <805) 325-4146 -- Nights (805) 324'6262 Facility Name C.E. Natco ~ No. of Tanks Type of Business (check): ~GaS°l'ine S'tation ~Other (deSCribe) Construction Company Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [']Yes ~]No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? [~Yes ~No Facility Address 4550 Pierce Rd. Nearest Cross St. Golden State Ave. T. R SEC (Rural I~oca'tions Cnly) Owner C.E. Nctc. o _.. Contact Person David .Butt. Address .3240 Pattqn Wa.v 'Z'ip 93308 Telephone <805) 589-9022 Operator C.E. Narco Contact Person Gary Uhalt Address '4550 Pierce' Rd. Zip 93308 ' Telephone" i80~)' 325-4146 B. ~ater to Facility Provided by Calif. Water Ser. Co. Depth to Groundwatar Soil Characteristics' at Facility Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth 'Det6rminati'ons ' C. Contractor CA Contractor' s License No. Address Zip' Telephone Proposed 'Starting Date Proposed Completion Dste Worker's C~mpensation Certific'~tion J Insurer ' D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Dmscribe Modificatiofls Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ! WaSte Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded ~ Premium Diesel Waste - -5tT- 3 [] El [] [] [] El Et Et F. Chemical Ccmposition of 'Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fu~ls) Tank $ Chemical Stored (non'commercial name) CAS $ (if known) Chemical Prev.i. ouslY Stored (if dif~'eren~) G. Transfer of Ownership Date o--ff-~-~nsfer Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept 'fully all oblig'ati°ns of t~'rmif NO. issu.d to . I understand that the Permitting Authority ma~ review and -- motif'fy or terminate 'the transfer of the Permit · to Operate this ~derground storage' facility upon receiving this completed form. This form has been completed um/d~r penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. Signature /~J~//~~ Title IWmna~er Date 3-27-85 ,,~, .----/, f Facilicf ~ame_ C E, Nmrr~ ~ Permit No.(~,',5 ~'.//2'?g .~ T~K ~ [ (FILL OUT ~EP~TE FO~ FOR ~ .~ T~K) FOR EACH SE~ION, CHECK ~ ~PROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~n-Vault~ '~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all 2 Tank Material Car~n Steel ~Stainless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~Fiberglass~l~ Steel Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~ ~in~ ~Bronze ~Unk~ ~Other (descri~) 3. Pr i~'ry Contai~nt ~te Installed ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~llons) ~nufacturer 2000 4. Tank ~econd~ Co~tai~ent ~le-Wall ~thetic Liner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~Un~o~ ~Other (descri~): 'Manufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca~cit~ (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~R~r ~kyd ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~o~ ~Other (descri~).: 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~Galvani'z~ ~Fi~rg'l~ss-Cl~ ~l~thylene Wrap ~V{nyl wra~i~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~kno~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Cath~ic Protection: ~ne ~press~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crtficial ~e ~t~ ~ri~ System & Egui~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ tanks only) ~Grou~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s) ~Vadose 'Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U-T~ Wi~out ~ner ~U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow to Monitori~ ~l(s)* ~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Liquid ~vel ~n~r* ~ Cond~tivit~ ~r' ~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~e, Monitori~ ~11 or ~ar ~ ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ Peri~ic Tigh~e~ Testi~ ~None ~o~ ~her b. Pipit: Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pipi~~ ~nitori~ S~p with ~ce~y ~al~ Concrete ~ce~y ~lf~ut C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~S~thetic Liner ~y ~None ~ Unkno~ ~ ~her *~ri~ ~ke & M~el: 8. Tank Tightness ~is ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Results of Test Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank Re. ir ~ Ta~ Re~i'r~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) ~ri~ Re. irs 10. ~erfilt Protection ~O~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ F~t Ga~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~ Auto Shut- Off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ke & ~el For ~ve ~ices 11. Pipi~ a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~Un~o~ ~terial Gal~z~ Pi~e. Thickne~ (inches) Di~eter Manufacturer ~Pressure ~Suction ~Gravity ~proxi~te ~ 0f Pi~ ~ b. Undergro~d Pipi~ Corrosion Proration : ~lvanized ~Fi~rglass<l~ ~press~ ~rrent ~criftcial ~e ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical Isolati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Secondary Contai~ent: ~le'Wall ~S~thetic Liner System ~ne, ~kno~ ~Other (descr i~) ': Facility Name C.E. permit ~/~.J ~--~'~ · ~ TANK ~ ~ (FILL OUT ~EPA~TE F()~ FOR ~.~,t T~K) FOR EACH SECTION, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaulted ~n-Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all 2. Tank Material ~Car~n Steel ~Stainless Steel ~l~inyt C~orid'e ~Fi~rglass~l~ Steel ~Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ ~Other (descri~) 3. Priory Contai~ent ~te Installed ~ic~ess ('Inches) Ca.city (Gallons) ~nufacturer 10,000 4. Tank Secoqdar~ Co~tai~ent. ~le-Wall ~thetic Liner ~Lin~,Vault ~ne ~o~ ~Other (descri~): Manufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~R~r ~kyd ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~o~ ~Other (descri~): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~Galvaniz~' ~Fi~rglass-Cl~ ~l~ylene Wrap ~Vinyl Wra~i~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Cath~ic Protection: ~ne ~press~ ~rrent Syst~ ~c'r'i~icial ~e ~t~ ~ri~ System & Equi~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ t~ks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s) ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~out ~ner ~U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow to Monitori~ ~ll(s)* ~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Liquid ~vel ~n~r~ ~ Cond~tivit~ ~r* ~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank- ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~e, Monitori~ ~11 or ~ar ~ce ~ ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ Peri.lc Tigh~e~ Testi~ ~None ~ ~o~ ~her .~ b. Pipit: Fl~-Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pipit' ~nitori~ S~p with ~ce~y ~ ~al~ Concrete ~ce~y ~!f-Cut C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~S~thetic Liner ~y ~None ~Unkno~ ~her *~ri~ ~ke & M~el: 8. Tank Tightness ~is ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Results of Test Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank Re~lr Ta~ Re~i r~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of Re. ir(s) ~ri~ Re. irs 10. ~erfill Protection ~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ F~t Ga~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~ Auto Shut- Off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ke & ~el For ~e ~ices 11. ~ a.. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~terial Galv~zed ,Thickne~ (inches) Di~eter Manufacturer ~Pressure' ~S~tion ~Gravity ~proxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~ b. Undergro~d Pipi~ Corrosion Proration : ~lvanized ~Fi~rglass-Cl~ ~presS~ ~'rrent ~crificial ~e ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical Isolati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (descri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~ent: ~le-Wall ~S~thetic Liner System ~ne ~kno~ Facil { ky Nam~ __~~ Permit No.,.j ~ (jOJ TANK ~ ./)- FILL OUT :~EP.~dRATE FORM FC TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H. 1. Tank is: []'Vaulted [2]Non-Vaul ted I-]Double-Wall []Single-Wall 2. ~ Material ~Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [-]Polyvinyl Chloride D Fiberglass-Clad Steel ~]Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [-]Concrete D Al~nin~n [-]Bronze [-]Unknown []Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 500 4. Tank Secondary Containment D']Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner rqLined Vault r~None [-]Unknow~ I-~Other (describe): Manufacturer: r~Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining []Rubber []Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay [~]Unlined []Unkno~ [~Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --]~Galva6£ze~ -~~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap K]Vinyl Wrapping rlTar or Asphalt []Unknown ~None []Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~None []Impressed Current System [~sacr~'ficial ;~e Syste~ Describe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception a. Tank: [2]Visual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitoring' W~ll(s) DVadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [~U-Tube Without Liner D u-Tube with Ccmpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring Well(s)* [] Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivit~ Sensor* [2] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank ' [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Frc~ U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space [] Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightr~ess Testing ~None [] Unknown [~ Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping' [] Monitoring S~p with Race~y [] Sealed Concrete Race~ay []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway r~ synthetic Liner Raceway []None ~Unknown [] Other · Describe Make & Model: 8. Tank Tightness ~iS Tank Been Tightness Tested? [-]Yes .]-]No ~Unkn°wn Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name ~ Testing Ccmpany 9. Tank Repa i r Tank Repaired? [~Yes ~No []unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repgirs .. 10.. Overfill Protection I ~Operator ~ills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level []Ta~e F~oat Gauge []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls r~Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box '[]None [-]unknown []Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Pipzng a. Underground Piping: r~Yes rqN0 []]Unknown Material Galvanized Thickness (inches) Diameter ' Manufacturer [-]Pressure []Suctio~ ~]Gravity · Approximate Length of '~ipe ~ b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : ~[Galvanized I-]Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current []Sacrificial Anode [']Polyethylene Wrap rqElectrical Isolation [']Vinyl wrap []Tar or Asphalt. [~]Unknown D']None ~]other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: D-]Double-Wall [~Synthetic Liner System ~None []Unknown [-]Other (describe):