The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMITIGATION .. ~- SOl L -RE'MEDIATION - I' ~' ~ - R EMOYAL---A-ND. _DISPOSAL- OF OI I~ CONTA.MI NATED SOlE -I.- D--J MANUEACTURI NO. I N CO R-PO'RAT'ED - 15OO- EAST'-CALIFORNIA" AVENUE _BAKERSFIELD-. . CALIFORNIA . JUNE 1995---- ". AND. ASSOCIATES, INC._ Consulting Geologists - - -Post Offige Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 ' .. (805) 871-3207 FAX (805) 871-3698 -. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Site Background ............................................................................................... 1 · Summary of Site Characterization .............................. ' ............................................ 2 Summary of Site Geology .................................................................................... 4 Soil Remediation ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 8 Exhibits: Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Tank Location Map Figure 3 Cross Section A-B Figure 4 Limits of Excavation Figure 5 Sidewall Profiles Appendix A Bakersfield City Fire Department - Approval of Work Plan Appendix B Hondo, Incorporated - Acceptance Letter D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated - Non-Hazardous Letter. Appendix C Analytical Results - Bottom and Sidewall Soil Samples Appendix D Summary of Soil Delivered to Hondo Incorporated and Import Soil used to Backfill Excavation C:\WPWIN60~WPDOCS\ FII~ES ~FI LES95\ D-/MFG3 .TOC SOIL REMEDIATION · REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · INTRODUCTION The soil remediation work for Mr. John Stockton of D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated has been completed. The remediation work occurred around and below a former underground storage tank location. The properly is located at 1500 East California Avenue in Bakersfield, California. It is approximately one mile east of Union Avenue. The property is situated in Section 28, T.29S., R.28E., M.D.B& M. (see Figures i and 2). The Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division is the lead regulatory agency. SITE BACKGROUND One underground storage tank was removed from the properly (see Figure 2). The tank was constructed of concrete and was used to store used cutting oil. It had a capacity of approximate- · ly 6,000 gallons. The tank was removed on February 9, 1994. There was no dispenser associated with the tank. · ! · ~" I ~ SCALE i :24,000 ! ½ 0 ! MIlE I000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 BO00 6000 7000 FEE~' COflTOUR INTERVAL 5 TO 20 FEET {ir~ IERVAL o~rrEns OE~NDINO ON QUAORAN~LEI NAIIONA~ GEODEHC VEnIICAL DAIUM Or 1929 LOCATION MAP D-d MANUFACTURiNG, INCORPORATED BAKERBFiELD, CALIFORNIA Seurce of ~nse M~p: U.S.~.S. Oil~le, 0il Cenler, Go, lord, and L~mont 7V~ ~ute Tr~ff~'nphie ~ndtnnffle~. 1054. rh,t,revi~ed lOfR nn(1 1~73. Figure 1 ....................... TA~'i~-i~CATIOi~I MAi~ .... D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 1S00 EAST cALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSi=IELD, CALIFORNIA $~i~-TH .GUTCIiER AND AssOCiATES. JuNE` i 995 · Figure 2 Following the tank removal, four soil samples were collected from beneath the bottom of the tank. The samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTX&E). The samples were analyzed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. Significant oil contaminated soil was detected beneath the tank. The 2 and 6 foot soil samples form the northeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 56,000 rog/kg and 11,000 rog/kg, respectively. The 2 and 6 foot samples from the southeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 50,000 rog/kg and 25,000 rog/kg, respectively. Minor concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected in the samples. No benzene was detected in the samples above the practical quantitative limit. Due'to the high concentration of contaminants in the soil below the tank, the Bakersfield City Fire Department required further characterization of the contaminated soil. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION In January 1995, three test holes were drilled around the former tank location as part of the characterization study. Eleven soil samples from the test holes were submitted for chemical analyses. The samples were analyzed for TRPH and three of the samples were also analyzed for copper, aluminum, and zinc. A detailed description of the soil sampling methodology and analytical results are included in the Site Characterization Study prepared by Smith-Gutcher and Associates in January ! 995. Moderate to high levels of oil contamination were found in the soils to a depth of approximately 25 feet below the surface. This contamination extends out radially for a distance of apProx- imately 10 feet from the center of the former tank location. The 10 and 25 foot soil samples from Test Hole No. I reportedly contained TRPH concentra- tions of 16,000 rog/kg and 130,000 mg/kg, respectively. No contaminants were detected in the samples collected from below a depth of 25 feet. Test Hole No. 1 was located near the center of the former tank location. Figure 3 shows cross section A-B constructed through Test Hole Nos. 2, 1, and 3. The cross section is from the site characterization report. It shows the approximate lateral extent of the contaminant plume to extend out approximately 10 feet radially from the center of the former tank location. As can be seen, soil samples collected from Test Hole No. 3 detected the extreme eastern edge of the plume. Test Hole No. 2 was located approximately 4 feet south of the plume based on the excavation limits. · Migration of contaminants around and below the tank appears to have been controlled by the influences of gravity and capillary action in the soil causing both vertical and some lateral migration. The maximum vertical extent of the contaminant plume was estimated to be 3 &~ .~C~R .~ .~50C~S . ~U~Y 1995 approximately 25 feet below the surface. The maximum areal extent of the contaminant plume · was estimated to be approximately 20 feet in diameter. Since sediments beneath the site are relatively homogenous at any given depth, the contaminant plume was assumed to be basically symmetrical. A horizontal slice through the plume is roughly circular. It was estimated that the contaminant plume consists of approximately 300 cubic yards · of soil. This value was determined by calculating the volumes of horizontal disks of various radii which approximate the shape of the plume. · SUMMARY OF SITE GEOLOGY According to the Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet (Jennings and others, 1963), the site is situated over Recent alluvial fan deposits. In general, these sediments consist of unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. The sediments encountered in the three test holes drilled at · the site consist mostly of brown to light brown, sand, silty sand, and silt. The sediments are loose to dense and appear highly to moderately permeable. They are also moist to slightly moist. According to the Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply Report, 1992, the depth to groundwater below the property is approximately 180 feet. There is no known shallow · groundwater in the general area. Groundwater quality within the unconfined aquifer below the property is fair to poor. The quality within the confined aquifer is good. The groundwater gradient below the property appears to be to the southeast. 4 SOIL REMEDIATION The soil remediation work plan describing the removal and disposal of the oil contaminated soil was approved by Mr. Howard Wines of the Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division (see Appendix A). The oil contaminated soil as described in my work plan was excavated on June 12, 1995. The concrete and asphalt were saw cut and hauled to the Granite Construction Company facility at 18850 James Road, Kern County, California for recycling. The soil was removed by MP Environmental Services. A long reach 235 Caterpillar excavator was used to remove the contaminated soil and a 950B Caterpillar front end loader was used to load the stockpiled soil into end dumps. MP Environmental Services transported approximately 323 tons &oil contaminated soil to the Hondo Incorporated facility on Stockdale Highway for recycling. Hondo accepted the oil contaminated soil for recycling based on the chemical analyses from the tank removal and characterization study and the written statement by Mr. John Stockton that the soil was non-hazardous based on the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Appendix B contains the letter from Hondo accepting the soil and Mr. Stocktons letter to Hondo stating that the soil is non-hazardous. Five soil samples were collected from the excavation once a vertical depth of approximately 25 feet was reached. One sample was collected from the bottom of the excavation and four sidewall samples were collected. The bottom sample was collected from a depth of approximately 25 feet below the ground surface. The four sidewall samples were collected from depths ranging from 12 to 13 feet below the ground surface. At this time the excavation was approximately 22 feet in diameter. The sample locations are shown on Figures 4 and 5. The samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons using EPA Method 418.1. Appendix C contains the analytical results for the five samples. The sample collected from the bottom of the excavation contained a TRPH concentration of 34 mg/kg. No contaminants were detected above the practical quantitative limit in the samples collected from the southern, eastern, or western sidewalls. The practical quantitative limit for the samples was 20 mg/kg. The sample collected from the northern sidewall contained a TRPH concentration of 460 mg/kg. This sample was collected from under an overhead canopy and underlying concrete pad. Removal of additional soil on the northern sidewall was not practical. On the mourning of June 13, 1995, the sidewalls of the excavation had soughed back under the surrounding concrete and asphalt. Figure 4 shows the limit of the sloughing at this time. As much as possible of the slough was removed form the excavation. Due to the possibility of foundation failure for two steel poles supporting the overhead canopy along the northern edge of the excavation, no further soil was removed. Figure 5 shows the sidewalls of the excavation at this time. No visible staining was observed on the southern or western sidewalls. A narrow soil stained stringer was visible on the eastern sidewall approximately 6 feet below the ground surface. It was approximately one foot thick and 12 feet in length. The northern sidewall was located along the edge of the overhead canopy and underlying concrete pad. There are three support poles along the edge of the concrete pad which support the canopy. The sidewall had 6 i_iMI~S i~i~ ~:~t~AVATION D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 11500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA S~IITIt -GUTCItER AND ASSOCIATES . JUNE 1995 ["i gtt~'e 4 SIDEWALL PROFILES D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 15OO EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · SMITIt-GUTCIIER AND ASSOCIATES - JUNE 1995 Figure 5 sloughed approximately 5 feet under the concrete pad and was endangering the foundations of · two of the support poles. As shown on Figure 5, an oil stained area was still visible on the northern sidewall. The stringer in the eastern sidewall is an extension of this stained area. A lighter colored stained area is present below the upper darker stained area. The lightly stained area extends to a depth of approximately 17 feet. The lighter area appeared to be a thin vertical slice through the extreme northern edge of the plume. Small patches of clean soil could be seen : · within the lightly stained soil. No stained soil was observed below this area. Figure 5 also shows the approximate locations at which the sidewall soil samples were collected. The sample from the northern sidewall was collected from near the edge of lightly oil stained area. The excavation was backfilled with clean sandy import soil. The soil was wetted as it was placed into the excavation. Once the excavation was backfilled to the original ground surface the broken edges of the surrounding asphalt and concrete were saw cut for a second time to make repaying of the area easier. A sprinkler will be used to further wet and compact the backfill. · Repaying of the area will occur at a later date. A summary of the soil delivered to Hondo Incorporated and the amount of import soil used to backfill the exacavation is included in Appendix D. Also include with the summary are copies of the weight tickets and bill of ladings for the soil delivered to Hondo. CONCLUSIONS All soil sampling was performed as per my work plan. The samples were transported to the ' laboratory under the appropriate chain of Custody records. Excavation of the oil contaminated · soil followed my work plan. Based on the results of the soil remediation at the property, no further work is deemed necessary. I would hope that once you review this report, a letter from the Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division can be forwarded to Mr. John Stockton of D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated that states no additional work is deemed necessary. .~~O~/~ Submitted by: / · \ 0~ ..... / ~. / guane R. Smith ~x~d,~X,,_ _/,~ ~/ Registered Geologist ' State of California No.3584 · C:\XVPWIN60\WPDOCSWILESWILES95XD- IMFG R. EM 8 APPENDIX A BAKERSFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF WORK PLAN FIRE SAFETY CONTROL & HAZARDOflS MATERIALS DIVISIONS 1715 CHESTER AVE. *, BAKERSFIELD, CA · 99301 RE. HUEY R.B. TOBIAS, HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR FIRE MARSHAL (805) 326-3979 (805) 326-3951 June 5, 1995 ~ ....~ ....... ...-..,~ -.{' . ~ .~ .-.~ .... ., , IED' . EDqJ'U'IZSI Duane Smith ............................... Smith-Gutcher and Associates P.O. Box 60706 Bakersfield, CA 93386-0706 RE: Contaminated soil extraction and removal work at 1500 East California Avenue. Dear Mr. Smith, This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed · under direct oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, ' Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician · HHW/dlm cc: J. Stockton A PP END IX B HONDO, INCORPORATED · ACCEPTANCE LETTER D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED NON-HAZARDOUS LETTER · ® · INC. March 17, 1995 · Duane R. Smith Smith/Gutcher Associates P. O. Box 60706 Bakersfield, CA · 93386-0706 Dear Duane: I've reviewed the information that you sent me and based on the · materials non-hazardous nature I'm willing to accept it for reuse/recycle in our road base material. Hondo would be willing to accept it here at our Stockdale facility at a rate of twenty-one (21) dollars per ton. We prefer that you arrange your own transportation since all of our trucks are currently under contract. If you have further questions, please feel free to call me. To schedule our receiving the materials, Contact Robert Coffee at our Stockdale office. Sincerely, Technical Services Manager ~ cc. Jess Karr, President, Hondo, Inc. Greg Baker, Compliance Manager, Hondo, Inc. Robert Coffee, Operations Manager, Hondo, Inc. P.O. Box 9931 · Bakersfield, California 93389 · Allen Rd. Stockdale Phone: (805) 589-2290 Phone: (805) 589-1042 Fax: (805) 589-5928 i Fax: (805) 589-1122 · D-J MFG., INC. (805) 322-4344 FAX (805) 322.6522 June 9, 1995 Mr. Farrell Neeley Hondo Chemical, Incorporated 20807 Stockdale Highway Bakersfield, CA 93312 RE: DISPOSAL OF NON-HAZARDOUS SOIL Dear Hr. Neeley: · This letter is to confirm that waste soils that have been generated at D-J Mfg., Inc., located at 1500 E. California Ave. in Bakersfield, California, will be recycled at Hondo Chemical , Incorporated. The rnateria] consists of approximately 450 tons of oil contaminated soil. Based upon the analysis performed on the waste material, the soil is non-hazardous as defined by the · California Code of Regulations, Title 22. If you have any questions, please fee] free to call. Sincerely, /0ohn D. Stockton, President 1 trhondo ~'-~' 1500 E. CALIFORNIA AVE., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93307 · · ANALYTICAL RESULTS BOTTOM AND SIDEWALL SOIL SAMPLES LABORAIORIES Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date RePorted: 06/20/95 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 06/13/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-07107-1 Attn: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFC. INC: BOTTOM SAM. · Sampling Date/Time: 06/12/95 ~ 01:45PM Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 34. mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor · All results listed tn this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. 9C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third pady Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1918 TotaI ~etroIeum ~ydrocarbon~ · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 06/20/95 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 06/13/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-07107-3 Attn: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFC. INC: SOUTH SAM. · Sampling Date/Time: 06/12/95 ® 01:45PM Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum · Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor · All results listed in this fepor~ ere for fhe exclusive use of the submlU~ln§ party. BC L:~bmatorles, Inc. essumes no responsibility for report sltemtlon, separation, detachment o7 third 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 9330B · [805) 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-1918 · LABORATORIES Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 06/20/95 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 06/13/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-07107-4 Attn: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFC. INC: EAST SAM. Sampling Date/Time: 06/12/95 ® 01:45PM Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 ,I · California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervl sor · All results listed In this report are for the exclusive use of the submltllng party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805~) 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 06/20/95 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 06/13/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-07107-5 Attn: DUAIgE R. SMI~A 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFC. INC: WEST SAM. Sampling Date/Time: 06/12/95 ® 02:30PM Method Constituents 'Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES page Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~ SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 06/20/95 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 06/13/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-07107-2 Attn: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFC. INC: NORTH SAM. Sampling Date/Time: 06/12/95 ® 01:45PM Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 460. mg/kg 100. EPA-418.1 · Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor · All results listed in thls report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. I~C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, (DA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-1918 ! . CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Location of SamplinR Sam le Collector Client )., .A~ · I:C~l~ny: Smith-Gutcher and Associates~ inc. Co~ny: ~.~.: ( ) ~o.,~: ~.os~ ~?~-~o~ ~.~: ( ) E] Billing to property out,er 'F~ Billing to'sampte collector r~ Bi[[ing to client Sampling Method: Sample Type: Preservation: Relinauished by: Compnn¥: Dn~e nnd Time: Received by: Compnn¥: D~te nnd Time: ' SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF SOIL DELIVERED TO HONDO INCORPORATED · AND IMPORT SOIL USED TO BACKFILL EXCAVATION MP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. D-J MANUFACTURING - TONNAGE LOG EXPORT MATERIAL TO HONDO i 452 24.25 6/12/95 2 487 22.41 6/12/95 3 452 24.10 6/12/95 4 487 22.21 6/12/95 5 452 22.62 6/12/95 6 487 23.00 6/12/95 7 452 28.81 6/12/95 8 487 20.31 6/13/95 9 452 24.95 6/13/95 10 487 20.92 6/13/95 11 452 22.16 6/13/95 12 487 20.29 6/13/95 13 452 23.18 6/13/95 14 487 17.46 6/13/95 15 452 6.33 6/13/95 IMPORT CLEAN FILL SAND 1 495 24.0 6/12/95 2 509 24.32 6/12/95 3 173 23.89 6/12/95 4 466 23.86 6/12/95 5 487 22.52 6/12/95 6 495 24.50 6/12/95 7 509 23.08 6/13/95 8 173 23.71 6/13/95 9 466 23.69 6/13/95 10 495 23.58 6/13/95 11 509 23.71 6/13/95 12 173 23.77 6/13/95 13 466 23.79 6/13/95 ~ ~O CE RT IFY ~at Ihe following deso'lbed commodity was welgh~4we~F911~, or Counted bY a welg hmaster, w~se ~g~re ~A~_.0n.thl~' cergflcetl, who Ii · ¢l<x~lnized ·u~ho¢lly of accuracy, as ~4~1~ [~hapter'? (commencing wllh Sec~on 12700) of DM~Io~ 5 of It~ CalIMmla BuMnels end Professions Code. admlnMtereo~by ~ ?lv~lon of ..IV~. rement Standards of Ihe California "- GAKERSFIELD. CA93312 (805)58g. 1042 TRUCK LICENSE TRAILER LICENSE TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE · SP22191 U193523 -/~=~ 'p ..~ W~IGHED FOR (SELLER) DELIVERED 1'O (8UYE? TRUCK CARRIER ~ PIFG tlondo uo,~'"id9 · i t~ ~c . 0t.ur~ 77740 lb (1;, (~ROSSLBS. W~lO~ff:O AT 20807 "-"/ I [ 4~_c,00 lb HET / BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 (.." I CASH PAID CH'~I3E SALE COMMODITY m [ C~AeOES~ c,~'~ · Road ~se Soil e PLACARDS TENDERED:YES I-'INO ~ .Eu,~ C.OD. TO: L.-//' ADDRESS ~HAR~ES _THIS ISTOCF~[~..IFY th~tthe following described commodity waswelghed, measure~_,gCcoun~lU by awelghmaster,whose ~lgrmture ~ on this ce~. who Is a reccgnlzed authority o! accuracy, aS prescribed by Cha~ter 7 '[oommendng wl~h Sec~on 12700) of OM ~l'o~r~r'ihe California ~,usb*mss m',d Professions Code. ~dmlnlstere~l blt~1e~, sloKof Measurement Smndmds of the California Del:~lf~ment ~ Fo~J ImdAgrlculture. ..,~ . , ~ HONDO INC. No- 0 20807 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY BAKERSFIELD. CA93312 (805)_589-I042 TP, AILEFI LICENSE / ~''; ~ /.c/ <.~ NO. 2 LICENSE :tUCK LICEN$~ TRAILER EIGHEO FOR (SELLER) DELIVERED TO (BUYER} TRUCK CARnlER " DO' ~ ~N'~nclo I'~ ode HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 12:56 TIME I DATE '~ '! q I ~: _ DEPUTy GROSS LBS. IR ~1 3 ;qr[ / ',-*" .,.,~c--- ,~-' DEPUTY TARE LBS. CHARGES /EIGHEO AT 20807/./ [ II 44~20 ! I) HE T NET LBS. ir.us.C.,,~owl FOCKDALE HIGHWAY ! X~ ~KER~;FIELD. CA 933t~ I CAS..^~D I cH^neE OMMODITY · ~load Base Soil EMARKS DRIVER//'] PLACARDS TENDERED:YES [-INO [~]/ REMIT C.O.O. TO: ADDRESS SHIPPER ,. .." CARRIER WEIGHMASTER CER'[IFICATE ]l13n this ced}flcate, who Is a rec~nlzed autho¢l~ of accuracy, as i~escdbed b,y .C.haple..r .7~(ccmmen?_n.g w,.m ...... l~Ivl$10n 5 of the California Business a~d Professions Code, administered by the L~V.,I~IIOn Ol ivl~amJrement utanoaros o; me t.m,om Department o! Food a~d Agdcultuce. '~.~< ....... ~ ....... HoiqDOfl~.~. ~.. m . 20807 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY . BAKERSFIELD. CA93312 1805) 589.1042 JCl< LICENSE I TRAILER LICENSE ?RAILER NO. 2 LICENSE I $P22191 I !:7Z93523 IGHED FOR {SELLER) DELIVERED TO (aUYER} TRUCK CARRIER HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER !.' 47 Pll 06 12 ,~ TIME / DATE 77420 [b ( ! ) GROSS LBS. 29220 ]b T~. TARE LBS. C,ARQES I~HEDAT 20~07 48200 lb HET HIGHWAY >C)~ NET Rc~d Ba.~ Soil REMIT PLACARDS TENDERED:YES I-]NO [] c.o,D, TO: ADDRESS I PPER ~ I CARRIE~ ' ~ '/ "' ' . PER ... -~' '"' ~"', ¥/7 .... ' ''~ '"'"' '~" ~' ': -'~ "/ '""*'- . WEIGHMASTER CERTIFIC, ATE , ~C, EI~TIFY that the Ioilowlng dee~lbed at:i~mo(:l~Wae weigh°d', measu'~d, orcounted by awelghmaster, whose I/onature · la on this cerUflcate, who IS a reoognlzed authority of accuracy, as I~e~cdbed by'Chapter 7 (commencing wllh SeCtOR ! 2700) of OM~lon 5 o! em Calltomll~u~lnees and Professions Code, administered by the Dtvl:lon of Me?&urement Standmds of the California DeplUlment o! ~:x)d'and Agrlcullure. . BAKERSFIELD. CA 93312 (805) 589-1042 _. mUCK LICENSE I TRAILER LICENSE ~ TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE WEIGHED FOR (SELLER) I DELIVERED TO (SUYER) , TRUCK CARRIER HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 2:17 PH 06 12 --DATE TIME I DATE '¢~'DATE DEPU:I ~'2000 ]b T~ GROSS LBS. CHARGES , . WEIGHED AT 20807 ! I DEPU I 44420 lb I'IET TARE LBS. u,o o~, STOCKDALE HIGHWAY ...BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 - ' CASH PAID CHARGE SALE NET LBS. COMMODITY " REMIT PLACARDS IENDEREO:YES WINO [~ c.oo.~o: / ADDRESS t~ll~n~tllr~al~l. ~ ~ ~ff ~ ~ke ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I FREIGHT CHARGES " ' SNIPPER f' ~ ~:' ./ .... "' CARRIER .'/;-~5/'' F'/~ >~' -' / ~ /,,~ _. I / P~a~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~. S~LE F65 LABELMASTER, An American La~lmark ~., Chlcego, IL ,',----=-..* ~,. · , . . . :. wEiGI. I~IASTER.CEHII'I~ATE .. I~TOC~Y ~~~ . ~,:- HON~ INC. BA~RSFIE~, CA ~312 (~5) ~1~2 L~NgE T~ILER L~EN~E T~ILER NO. 2 L~ENSE F~ (~E~ , DEL~RED TO (9~E~ TR~K CARRIER HONDO cHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER TIME I DA~ ' . 74400 lb (2) ~2 qR oEPu~ 2~1&0 lb TR GROSSLY. TARE L~. ~ ~~ o~.u~ 4~240 lb HET ) AT ~7 NET ' ~RSFIE~, CA 9~12 C~H ~E~RKS '.:.' :. :~. :-. :..:: ': .f,' ,. 7. .... ;'. . ' .' ' ~'.~.'2'. .?..-'.. r .... :.. . · :.:~' .:... - ..:. ~.~...' : -. ':" .~ ..: . · ,. =~'.¥':~:. ,;.v.".. ' '!:."~ '",.' ~-'.:".'.' ' .. ' · ...- ;..'.'-~e~..~.'..'. · ,: .4'~'.. e . : ~.~:..'...-:'.: ~ ;..~=..... -:., .. :, .. -,- i ¢:':.'::..:" '~:,: ~:'.... .-.: ! .. ':i-:-';. ,'~' ;,. '. :~_: :.~' ' ':. " lED:YEs' O: 'i;~'!:':('' ,':' ""' .~'/ " C.O.O. TO: . ::*~' , '* ' .~ " .... ? '~ ~.' ' ' ~' ' AIX~E,~9 // " .... ~ · ' * ~' ' ' '" ' " t~i,~,~ ~ m~ m* ~.~.~ ~ n. ~,~g~m*~ ..* ;"';": C.O.O. I~E: .-,.-~--~--.- --.,, ,-, ,~,- COD :::':'::4.~'':~ ' "'~":': "":' t, dg~.~-~-.,=h~l..ud~o... · *-g;' ~" i:?' ~:~ * Tim ~ dml r~ ~ ddv~, ~ .v~ ~ v, ahou~ p~/ffmm d FREIGHT CHARGES ::.....,. . ' :' I..)- ...... ~ ~ 1:' . '/~? '.: : . ., 'WEIGHMASTER cERTiFICATE .~ : 'TH~lFY~t~tlhe foaowlng deecrl~ewelghed,m~a~i1~,or counted by ,welg'hmaater,w~se,g~mre ' I~ ;~ ti on .'?ti ~wh~ti I recognized authority Gl accuracy, a~ pil~sc~bed l~,Chapter ? {commencing with Se~on 12700) I~1~ ~ DM~n8~f~.C~i.:~m~Bu~ne~ndPmf®a~n~c~de~adm~n~"temdbytheD~v~a~n~fMe~JremntSmndard"~fthe~f~m~a , ii~ o,~m. *m~r-ood,ndAO,~=u~,. . .,'.?.'...~.~.T:.::'-~ ',:~. ... ' .... .. ~...: ,~,~-;. . ~,..,: .... ,,t'IONO0 IflC~.': '* . ,~ ~,o.o, ,,oc,<,,,,,.E .,,~,.,w,,¥ - N9 03082.2; ~ BAKERSFIELD, 0A93312 lB05) 589-1042 ,: 'I'~UCK liCeNSE TRAILER I. ICENSE TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE '"'"' SP2,2213 Y85708 · ~ . '"""'~1~1~) FOR (~I.I.ER) ' DELIVERED 1'O (BUYER) TRUOK ~ARRIER '"~ ~?' ~' ; ' ! HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 3', 34 Pt'l 06 12 ~ ' * ~'/"~,./~z_.-/ 77940 lb (2) TIME ! DATE I'--' ~: 6'1:2 ~)5 ' ~ ' GROSS LB~. '~/ 31940 lb IR , : p~Pu1.y I . "~. t6 i1~- ~5 , ,. ~tPm¥ 46000 lb .' '.WEIGHED AT 20807 I I · S:TOCKDALE HIGHWAY I ~ 'I NET I.B~. · BAKERSFIELD, q~ ,9~12 CAsx p,*,~o CHARGE 8At. E I: ':.*,,'.' ..':o '~ .%. ,:..:'.....~.;, .¢ / · .'~'.'., ~.'::, :" ,, ,'~. .'.,'...', ; .. ~:!'.'.::: ".,::'. : ,:...~ ' .' · '.'-'.....~. ~,::', ":...... ,,. ..... ~.. .. ... :',. "'~:~ · ii::,::;:': "' .... "' " .-, '".. .... :,:'.,'t ..... i .':~:~,"-:'. :'.:. ",". '- .'.: :-: "' .. .,.. ... . .~ ... ,.. , ...,:,;...: .j......~".~:::". ...., .:,... ,. ..... ; >' , . ... ,.. . .?, . .' ~..-'i:;' :~"."' ' * ' '.'.* , . . , "' ' ,!;f~.' ' ,.' ' . .~. :~,. . ~. ... ';..' . .~ ~.~: :::...:.:...!: ; . '.': :. ::"..~ .'... :'. .. . ! .. . : .,. · .:.' ... · ; '¢;": ~:~'"'"::' ':; .'.; .... '":' '"~'':'''' ;. ;.~.' '~-" '* '&'. ~_' '' ' ' ::'"" ' r'71N.O., [~!:: C.O.D, 1'O: . .,,: .'.'<'""~ :.- ~ .... . ' '. ADORESS" ,'.&~,~.~.~,~.~,~ ~ ~,,r, Of ,,,, ~.,,~ . c.o.D. CEE: · -, -, -,- -.-- --,,-,-:.~ COD' Ami: $ ' F~EPAID El :, ..::::;...,,.,.: ,' ..:..... . ,' :-~ ..'. :.''.": ,...... ." . proof'fy uttdet the ~tlr~'t) ~ tO can'y to ~tl ~ ~ Of : ~ cla~Nflr*ltiofl ~r~ I~e S8~ le~ and cor. ditiO~l are hereof agreed lo by the ~ and · .;~. ,,...-- · .. '.'" .,"- CARRIER //?' ' '~ -~::' ,, * , ,., .... '....:,: .... i PER ., .... :~. :. . ....... ,?:'~:..,...,:.:~....., , . . _ .:.,,-....,,,.-.'., .'..,. ,, .~...,, ,, ,^,E " /_.-- .,'. .... ? /~..'- f..:... ;, , .~ .' , . . . .... """ ';" ' ' '- ' ~":~.~___:.~..~_= " ' STYLEI~SLABELMASTER. AnAmerlcanLaI~Ima~o..CNc.go. lL~(~46 ,~¢ ,' .... ~. ..:, ,'.,: _ ..-, :,~.:., .~-- ,, · ' ~K L~NgE T~ILER L~ENSE : T~[ER ~. 2 L~ENgE :~ HONDO'CHEM!~ALINC. WEIGHMASTER 4~44 P~ O~ 12 ~ TIME / DA~ oA~ ', ~ 867~ lb (1) L..WEI~ED AT ~7 ~7~20 ]b HET ; S~ALE HIGHWAY ~ · NET ~. ,_~RS~ELD. CA 9~12 ' ! CASH PAID I C~RGE SALE : 2' ~ C,O,O. ~: ' . .~.'ll'llSl~'~O~ll~thatlh followlngdescdt)edc~mmodl, wasWe"meaaur Ig *~11~% ' . . ' . ' .. . .? ....... :., :, ...,~,.. Ighed,.. __ed, orcountedbya~e_hmaster,whose,lgnature t!' ~)~l~lm~ ~er~ -mm~u u~- .n e~. -"-an ~ ,roms,on, Code, =dmlnlstemd by the Division of Mea~rement Standards of Ihe i' '" 20807 STOCKDALE ~ ' ,, · BAKERSFIELD. CA 93312 (805) 589-1042 ? JCK LICENSE I TRAILER LICENSE =. TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE Ii ~'22213 I Y~5707 V~. IOHED FOil !9¢_LLFJ~} I DELIVERED TO (BUYER) .. mUCK CARRIER -:. :::': HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 4:49 PH u~> t z -..~; ".~ ~~ ;PunyI 3t900 lb TR GROSSLB~. ' · :~..' 16 1~2 95 "'. EPUTY 40620 lb HET TARE LBS,' · ' 'WEIGHED AT 20807, I I ' ~J'OCKDALE HIGHWAY · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 CASH PAIO '~HAROE SALE NET LBS. COMMODITY ~ .~ SOIh.~ :i: ~:..;.~; ..:~....: .~,:~,.:. ,"' ,: '.ii!:.'!. ': "~i-,.'i,... ;... '! .': ' ' ' '~; ... .~ .,~- .i.."~ . :; .~;'!.'"' :...,-:..'..~.. ..-....::.:' ':., ... ,: .. .... :.'!:... ....;:..':... [:~.... ;~;:-...;.,: ,:: .... . '.. -.: .... ~,, .... ::.'.:. . : · , .....:: :;..~: ..... .. :.:.. ...';**_.:.'.: · ~ :.: 'v, .: '~. '. '. "':, ,~.-.m ~"'a ~'..·:'.':" ~.o.~.~,*. ~ ~ '/· ~ ~'~" '" .... ' "· A~ORESS ~ / ,- ~ · ., n~ea~dam~a~M~d.~=~d,m~dar~.~l~d.,~l ' ' ,. COU~CI' RECENED. III~W~toIh~o~ai~iO~Ind I~lty filed taftfflkleftoc~o~lheGllllollhelm_l~of laldl~utetodeltmlfio~lndlatoeachpm'tylt&nytime.'4efelledml~lM~.~y I:oond#id~dom~lenllM~unkn~.~).mBfked.~on~igned. l~dde~imedllk'idlClledlb~ve ' govemingc~a~.~i~iclflononthedlleMa~ipme~t. ~ . /' ~'t . the I~'~Mty ~ the comr~cfl ag~eel to ca~' to Itl ~ i~ace Gl g~ claa~icllio~ I~1 Ihe Mid fa~m~ and cemfil~ ::~ .: ,., . . ...~:. ,.: .'..' ,-.~ . . . . · . . ... '::'". .... ', . CARRIER '~" ~ "'*' ' /.,.~l, ,. <.:.'"' t /. ~' .ER :/,'~.,,./Z. ~'~' palt"O~ ~ e4 i~.. ::.'~ ..... .. 'i~ P~mw~- [~[~,m,~l II1~I~ -- ' "' :': R~'I~I.~ PM~ ~ STYLE F65 LABELMASTER, An American Labelm,l~ Co., Chicago, Il ' ~ . ~ ,.,:.. ' ~;, ,~ i~ ' .... WEIGHMAGTERCERTIFJCATE . ..'.: ,~* ~1~ kgTO C~ flTE=Y ~ th'~ foll~no de~'"~was welgh~l, m"~rur~d, Or counted by, W;Ighmasler, who,e ~":~ II on Ihll cer~llce~e..who Ii i recognized .ul~o~/of .ccUmc~,,as i)re~cdbed By Chsp/er 7 ((~mmendng w,h Sec~on 12700) of ~ :. ~v~n$~ec~m~Bu~nes~ndPr~i~ess~n~C~de~adm~n~steredby~e~n~re~nt8m~Ed~e~ '" -: '" ' 030E2u · - ' 20~07 H'R:)CKOALE HIGHWAY " -:. ;; , BAKERSFIELD, CAg~312 (805) ~89-1Oa2 ~JCK LICENSE , . TRAILER LICENSE TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE :.~-~IOHED FOR (gELLER). DELIVEREO TO ~UYER) TRUCK CARRIgR ' "; HONDO CHEMICAL. INC. WEIGHMASTER 6101 ~H 06 13 95 .. · TIME I DATE ..~. '..* f 6 /13 95 DEPUTY GROSS LB~. ~"'~T~ ~ ~ ../. 29380 lb TR :.':. ','6,13' 95 /~.~~ O,,UTY 49900 lb HET TARE LBS.. C.^RO£S "., WEIGHED AT 20807 - I / [ u.e '.' STOOKDALE HIGHWAY I . NET L~:" ;': .:': BAKEBSFtELD. CA 9331~ ! C&SH PA~O CHARO~. SAm ~. COMMODITY ,.:~-:,- j~'..~.';~ ,: ;.. . · .... · :.~;; .. . ,-,. .... . .. · ;; ~Z'.~;; '.:~;~,:-. : .... ~ ' ~ , ' . , ..r .".;;' ,:"! ',J:;;:'" " L.:;,.'~i'. ,:',' ;. ~' ',' · .'.:. '-.'~;' /L.~ ' ... - ,, ;'~:.#:. "~i: :v-:' · '*:~.~;",*;:~...,'." ~;h::' .' ;~:r*~,' ;':'. ' :, ,. .~:.':-::..:-. ,~-,'.;- -, ,, '~. '~:;,","h'.':.~ ~ ,, :-' ~': '~;., . ' · ; : '..' .~::.. .., · ,,~. :,. :.,~. ~-~o' ,...~ · , .., _ .~:'f.~::::'<?'::': .4-, --~ :.%.:,? -.::.- ..:,:.:~,.,-~:-: ,,..,.. . . .:., =,,;.....:, : ,'.'~i': ':':-;=" ." ':." ' ' ' ·" " .~'?',<t~"::' L ," '~-"' ' ' ': ' ' " ,; -.= .~,,: ,.,'~.. ,.'.. · .,.. :. ,., ,~,~., ',~., .,,":. ',., ., '.,;. ,'..~ , , . .,.';, , ,-~. .,,, eullx)d~y of T~ILER L~EN9E : T~ILER ~. 2 L~ENSE m57o8 DEL~RED TO ~ER) m~K CARRIER /~'<;' ~ ~. HffiDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER ~ME I OA~ ~. 73900 lb (2) .. ,.,.~.~3 32060 lb TR GROSS L~. ~7 41840 lb NET TARE L~. HIG~AY ~ "L.D.. ii * ' , ~c~" ~ WEIGHMASTER_CER'RFICATE . · ." ~. ~.. * * * ,;;.:'e'.,~.~,'~:rr~.'' ",;¥: ~ ' ' ' ' ~I~ :' .: ~r114~s~S~cERT~FYt~mt~hef~w~n~descr~bedc~m~W~i~e~h~d~me~ed~c~unt~a~e~hm~s~er~w~se~g~e ... '" ' · '. .q D~vlllOn 5 of ~ C~llfo~ Business and Profesmo~s L;ooe. 8omlnm~ereo oy o~e I~s~on o!lvleasuremen! Standaros o! me ~,eJlrom ~1, . .'E DepOxlmentofFoodondAorlculture. .,. ,. · .~ ,~' ~A ' --~r~'".." ..... f:~ ~"" .... "'"'"" ": ...... .'~' '"' :; 'HONIX) INC'"'~'. - ~ '.11~UCK UC~ENgE TRAILER LICENSE TRAILER NO. 2 LICENSE ': " ~1R:~22191 [7Z'93523 __ -- · W~,IGHEO FOR (SELLER) DELIVERED TO (BUYER) TRUCK CARRIER * - · .:'i~! ' ' HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 712]. l~ir~ o~, ~.3 95 TIME / DATe: ~ 73740 lb ? '~ 6/13 95 oEPUW GROSS LBSi Ii ox. A/(~~ 29420 ]b TR ii:~,' t 6 113 9,5 ' DEPUTY TAflELB~. ~.: ,...~'.OCKDALE HIGHWAY NET LB~. ~:, '-" I~KER~FIELD, CA 9~ 12 CASH PA'D CHAReE 8ALE I' ;~-,.:,.··" ....... . ..... ,= ¥.,.~ :!..:-..~., ~.. ../..;...;,;,~--; .,~.~:::~.._..?.:!.,~-- ?.:!....~ . . .;. .. i ":"' ','-~-.;".'.. · ",";~' ' '.-'%;.;'"":." . ' . '~. ' .:. ....... ,;.,.....;.... . ,,., ...,.,; ,~. ......... .~,~..,:, ;:. . ""~":"--:'"'"' :,';~-. .. '.,-" L'. ' ;.,. ...?' .~. :..= ,,,.'., ~. · , . :: .? ..; ' r., .: .. ": L.;,...:..¥:.'.e. ;- ..:~ ..'. . ".~ ,.. ...-;.: ,.~ '. !...;,;,~ .. ,- . ,: ~;:..:PLACARI)S: TENDERED:YES r-INO I~ REMIT ,. ..... ~ ....... ,- ,, . , . .. ' C.O.D. TO: ,'T/~., A~RE~g '~ ' ~" ~"' ' ' ' ~ " ' " ~ C.O.D. FLEE: I PREPAID n $ ...... ' ~.*.. Bf~ i~ M ~. i~ i~o~M mydm~ for tn~p~d by i Rdle ~ m~em~: ' I C~M~di: $ da~(~ib~ MXW~ i~ ~QO~t~l ~oo~ Or'M, ~xc~ li~ ~OtM:I (¢or~l I~d - Wv~ce Io Ix p~n~:l~med hM~JW ih~l be sM~cl fo ~ I1~ ~JI ol hKling lenmtl Ind conddl~nl m ~ M plctl~el u~l,'ml~t~d. 0(~1~. a~d ~elltM II In~led IIx~e' , ' ' .' goveminOclalldlcatk)~onthedateMIhi~t. p~y ~ the corn,Id) ageeee 1o clf,y fo itl ~ place Gl · '. · go,.~m~g cll~aaicatioa and the said terns and cond,tio~l a~e hMe{w e,g~eed 1~ t)y Ihe a~ippM and . ~hendle to delie~' k) am~h~ came* o. the mute to laid 04 gll Ol' ~ly W, ~id pn~oMty GYM 6110f imy portion OI ¢.~_ '',. ,~ .,"~':". ,, ..... ' .... CARRIER //-,/'-,")' PER ...... .;:.~.:¥,'. ,:,.,- ,'., .. . . ~;, ,,..,~ · : . .. ~ ,- .. 0 ~ I~'IFY ~ ~e ,c~°Wlng de,~rlbed comm°dlty wa, weighed, n3.eaa~ _e~_, ~, counmd~by ~,wel?hmn? !er_, w .1~. ,. ld297~O~ ~ c~e, ~ Il · recognized autho~t~ O! accuracy; as pre~crll~d I:~..h~r 7 (commeno?g w!U~ ?ec?.? l_;g/_?l I · ' ~7 ~OAL[ H~AY gA~RSFIE~, CA ~t2 (~5) ~g-1~2 , ~K L~NSE ~ILER L~ENSE T~ILER ~. 2 L~ENSE SE~ DEL~RED TO HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER , , TIME / DATE' 3 95 :: GROSS L~., 32~0 ' 3 95 ' 40580 Ib HET TARE L~' m~ .... ED AT ~7 JIGHWAY ' ~RKS DRIVER ....... COD U~ Li*' * : .... ':'. WEIG~MAgTER CERTIFICATE · ', ' I .... ~ERSFIELD CA~12 (~5) ~1~2 ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ,'. HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER 81~0 .: ;~:.~~~//~"~ , ~ " TIME / DA~ GROS8 L~, ~ 29~20 ]b TR ' LD C 9~ NET ~. RE~R~ · , , ~'? ...:.,. ; -..' . . '.~ ,.,~ Ill)****,: *~. '* :.~"', · ' '.' ~':.WEIGHMASTER (;ERTIIRCRTE ! ...... '.1 ~ ~ ~- . ~' ~7 S~C~ALE H~WAY I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, , , . .'. :.~ ., .. · . .x .,:..~.~. ~" ~ ' ' ' ' TRUCKC R~IE" r':~F~(sE~~ I OEL~RE~T~ER) / I ',C~ ~ .) '. ., .' HONDO CHEMICAL INC. WEIGHMASTER I TIME I DATE / ,S L.. · . 9=00 AH 06 I3 9~ ~s OEPU~ TARE L~. ~r~ ~ '.:WEI~EDAT~7 ~68~ ]b (7) NET~. * 34<)20 lb NET · ~REI~a~RK8 ORIVER~ ~ ., :,.~ ~ ., · ?, '>:..':.'.:" .~:. :,':....,.:..:;'. :..'.....: .. . ~.:'..' ~...,. ,.,, .~. ',':.'-.~,.'.,%:~ , ~. ~.:,.....: ., . ....... ,. . . ,:..': · , . . ~ ,,....'.."'", :,,":::' ';.~ - , · :. · .',/" / C.O.D. FEE: TOTAL " , "" DATE ~.-' '/~- ~ . ;~' THIS ISTOCE m-IFy that the following described COmmodlt7 wa~ welghe~ measurad.,t:}r counted by 8welghmaster0 whose ~lgnamra · l'." "i~' ~ on thai ce~fl~ate, who Il a recognized authorlt7 o! accuracy, as prescribed by Chapter 7 (commenting with Sec~on 12700) of " ~.'?: ~entDM~'tS°flhe Callfo~nlaBuslnee, and Professions Code. admlnleteredby tl.'~ Dlvlslo~of Measurement Standards of~eCaJlfomlao! ~ a~l Agrleultura ....... " ~. ~ '~.'! "'~ HONDO INC. ';.' (..,..,o. 0 3 0 6 4 ..~. ., W~IGHEO FOR (SELLER) ~. DELIV~REO TO (BUYER) TRUCK CARRIER · !i"' HONDO CHEMICA~"I~ WEIGHMASTER 10:2! nfl 06 13 95 .. · z 4 TIME I DATE ': ,. 42 ! 00 1 b (2) GROSS LBS. 29440 lb TR DEPUTY TARE LBS..i C~Am~Estr~, c~ 12660 lb NET ~o~ HIGHWAY NET LBS. REMARKSi~ "~ · '" ...... ' ' ' ':'"" ': '-"f:' -* '; '., i · ... :..~.. :;:,.-. ,V'..'-~;~:, ~:'q-;~..... , .... .~,:.,:i .:,',,~...~..~ ,?.. :~,. ,.,,.,..;:?:::?~:.. ".'. - , . :";' *. ,;'", '~:'*- ,~' *~.Y.'" '. ;O:' ' :':'*' ".',,;i..:,~' ,::~:::" '"'' .' "; :: * ' · ' ',,:?;: ....,' :..:*. . .., ,, . . ,: :,,, ,~: .:,~ ~:/'.**:' ;'."::'.' .,,,- ;.. .'~-~, . .: ., ~'**~'**'~*,,*. ........ · ,.. ~ .',i~.:.'( i;i! ;' .-;.~/' ~ ':.,. :'? , i'i-"-' ·''' ';~ "". .. ;a,'~.., · *':*"" ' * ' [*' -'t'. ' " ' :' ". '* '~ :: ";. .,i, ': :- :.: :'~*.:. ' ' , * ' /J~:;;' '" ,i~, ' ' :... '."~:. ' . h'.;: ..'.' · ' ,* ':" .*'/ -. ',. !.',:.;,.- ~, ,.* ~ .~ . ...* ~.yE;s.·i--iNO. ~ .~',',. , C.O.D. TO: . '-~'~"" "-'~ ~' -'-'' COD c.o.o. - .~~ . .. ~~: ....... "~, ' ~'* ' .. CARRIER /' .', "-" .... "' "' /3 74- : ..... :-,; .... ,'. ' DATE ,,, -. ,~~~'~~. SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Geologists Post Office Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 (805) 871-3207 May 30, 1995 .... ~. Howard Wines ';*;- " Bakersfield City Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue By. Bakersfield, Califo~a 93301 Dear Mr. Wines: Enclosed is a copy of the soil remediation work plan for D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated located at 1500 East California Avenue. Please review as soon as possible and let me know if you require any changes. I would like to start the work as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Yours truly, Duane R. Smith SOIL REMEDIATION WORK .PLAN · RE,MOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF CONTAMI NATED SOl g 1500 EAST cALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD. CAL'I FORN IA · J U N E 1995 ' $MITH-G UTCHER AND A$$OCIATES, INC. Consulting Geologists Post Office Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 (805) 871-3207 FAX (805) 871-3698 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .............................................................................................................................. l Site Background ............. · .......................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Site Geology ......................................................................................................... 5 Summary of Site Characterization ............................................................................................. 6 Summary of'Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 7 Remediation Plan ..................................................................................................................... 8 Quality Assurance Procedures ................................................................................................. 9 Site Safety Plan ....................................................................................................................... 10 Exhibits: Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Tank Location Map Figure 3 Cross Section A-B CSW1PWIN60\WPDOCS~FILES~FILES95~D-IMFG2.TOC SOIL REMEDIATION WORK PLAN · REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · INTRODUCTION In accordance with a request by Mr. John Stockton of D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated a · remediation work plan has been prepared for remediation of oil contaminated soil below a former underground tank location. It is located on the property at 1500 East California Avenue in Bakersfield, California. The property is located in Section 28, T.29S., R.28E., M.DB.& M. (see Figure l). The property is located about one mile east of Union Avenue. The Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division is the lead regulatory agency. The purpose of this work plan is to describe an acceptable soil remediation method for soil contamination from releases of used cutting oil below and around a former concrete tank location. · This work plan describes the remediation of the soil from the surface to a depth of approximately 27.5 feet and out from the tank location a radial distance of approximately 10 feet. ',',,-'-;' T' -i :. ['---;'1I'~'7:;:.,~,t,~7/ . c°qt'~P~$': I1', '11 ./Iii ; ~ ' I~lZ__:.l' ,.' I rR % ", -1I ~,'" , ~'-~--.. ~']'-',:~ ~~--~/. ~' ' '~~:.' .. ~" ~ ~ ....... - ..... .--1/:~,:~ ..... :-"V.' ~"" ',U '".." ~-~;~~~?L' J' ~" ,~i' 1J":~1//' 7~L_ ~// 28~~;1~:~':,~.! ~~._.L~ ~~ ~ ,I-, --~ ~,, - o,._,.., .__: __., , /t.-1 '~i]. , !.~l~ .... II'--'l---II"N JL "-- /.' s~h ' ......... · ?~ ~?-~ ~ '""' ..... I"~'~'~' ' ....... ]l ............. ~LJl~/ , ' ....... ~,:' II SCALE 1:24,000 1 ~ 0 1 MILE I I ! ! I I I I I I I I ~ 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET · ~ ~ ~ I ! I I I CONTOUR INTERVAL S TO 20 FEET lin I[~VAL DIf[ERS DE~NDIN8 ON N~TION~L ~[ODETIC VE~TICAL D~TUM OF 1929 LOCATION ~AP ~ D-J MANUFACTURING, INOORPORATED BAKERS~IELO, CALIFORNIA Source ~f B,se M~p: U.~.6.~. 0ild~le, 0il ~enle~, TANK LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTURINL~, INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELD, cALIFORNIA E~llI'I'II -CI)'I'CIIEII ANII A$,_qOCIA'I'F.,,,~ - /N¢)I'I~/IIIIEII 1 994, · Figure 2 · The soil remediation described in this work plan has the following objectives: 1. Excavate the oil contaminated soil to a depth of approximately 27.5 feet. The excavation will be approximately 20 feet in diameter. Approximately 300 cubic yards (450 tons) of soil will be removed and stockpiled of the property. 2. Transport approximately 450 tons ofoil contaminated soil to Hondo Chemical, Incorporated for recycling. · 3. Backfill the excavation to the surface with clean sandy material and return the surface to a level condition. · The scope of services described in this work plan include: · 1. Locating underground utilities using Underground Service Alert (U.S.A.). 2. Excavate oil contaminated soil to a depth of approximately 27.5 feet below ground surface and out radially approximately 10 feet from the center of the former tank loca- tion. · 3. Stockpile approximately 450 tons of contaminated soil near the excavation. Any clean · ~oil will be stockpiled and placed back into the excavation at the appropriate time. The property is fenced and the gates will be locked at the end of each work day. · 4. Collect one soil sample from the base of the excavation and four sidewall samples. They will be analyzed to verify that the oil contaminated soil has been removed. 5. The vertical and lateral limits of the excavation are based on the site assessment report prepared by Smith-Gutcher and Associates. Soil left in-place will be considered "clean" · if total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) do not exceed a maximum concentration of 100 mg/kg 6. Upon completion of excavating the contaminated soil, one soil sample will be collected from the base of the excavation and four samples will be collected from the sidewalls. · The samples will be placed in a glass jars, furnished by the laboratory, to full capacity leaving no headspace. They will then be sealed with a Teflon lined lid, labeled, placed in an ice chest at 4°C, and transported to a state certified laboratory accompanied by a chain of custody record. · 7. The soil samples will be analyzed for the presence of TRPH using EPA Method 418.1. 8. Transporting the contaminated soil to the Hondo Chemical, Incorporated facility for · recycling will begin as soon as possible. It will take less than two days to transport the soil to the recycling facility. 9. If the analytical results for the soil samples indicate that the concentrations of TRPH are less than 1 O0 mg/kg, then it will be concluded that all the contaminated soil has been · removed. 10. Once the contaminated soil has been removed the excavation will be backfilled with clean sandy material. It will take less than a day to backfill the excavation. · SITE BACKGROUND One underground storage tank was removed from the property (see Figure 2). The tank was · constructed of concrete and was used to store used cutting oil. It had a capacity of approximate- ly 6,000 gallons. The tank was removed on February 9, 1994. There was no dispenser associated with the tank. A drain line approximately 20 feet in length ran from the building to the tank · Following the tank removal, four soil samples were collected from beneath the bottom of tank. The samples were analyzed for TRPH and BTX&E The samples were analyzed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. 4 · Significant soil contamination was detected beneath the tank. The 2 and 6 foot soil samples form · the northeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 56,000 rog/kg and 11,000 rog/kg, respectively. The 2 and 6 foot samples from the southeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 50,000 rog/kg and 25,000 mg/kg, respectively. Minor concentrations of toluene, ethyibenzene and total xylenes were detected in the samples. No benzene was detected in the samples above the minimum reporting level. Due to the high concentration of contaminants in the soil below the tank, the Bakersfield City Fire Department required further characterization of the contamination. SUMMARY OF SITE GEOLOGY According to the Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet (Jennings and others, 1963), the site is situated over Recent alluvial fan deposits. In general, these sediments consist of · unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. The sediments encountered in the three test holes drilled at the site consist mostly of brown to light brown, sand, silty sand, and silt. The sediments are loose to dense and appear highly to moderately permeable. They are also moist to slightly moist. According to the Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply Report, 1992, the depth to · groundwater below the property is approximately 180 feet. There is no known shallow groundwater in the general area. Groundwater quality within the unconfined aquifer below the property is fair to poor. The quality within the confined aquifer is good. The groundwater · gradient below the property appears to be to the southeast. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION In January 1995, three test holes were drilled around the former tank location as part of the characterization study. Eleven soil samples from the test holes were submitted for chemical analyses. The samples were analyzed for TRPH with three of the samples analyzed for copper, aluminum, and zinc. A detailed description of the soil sampling methodology and analytical results is included in the Site Characterization Study prepared by Smith~Gutcher and Associates in January 1995. Moderate to high levels ofoil contamination were found in the soils to a depth of approximately · 25 feet below the surface. This contamination extends out radially for a distance of approx- imately l 0 feet from the center of the former tank location. · The 10 and 25 foot soil samples from Test Hole No. I reportedly contained TRPH concentrations of ! 6,000 rog/kg and 130,000 rog/kg, respectively. No contaminants were · detected in the samples collected from below a depth of 25 feet. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Figure 3 shows the extent of the contaminant plume as mapped by Smith-Gutcher and Associates. It shows the location of cross section A-B through Test Hole Nos. l, 2, and 3. It also shows the approximate lateral extent of the contaminant plume to extend out approximately 10 feet radially from the center of the former tank location. Migration ofc°ntaminants around and below the tank appears to have been controlled by the influences of gravity and capillary action in the soil causing both vertical and some lateral · migration. The maximum vertical extent of the contaminant plume is estimated to be approximately 27.5 feet below the surface. The maximum areal extent of the contaminant plume is estimated to be approximately 20 feet in diameter. Since sediments beneath the site are relatively homogenous at any given depth, the contaminant · plume is assumed to be basically symmetrical. A horizontal slice through the plume is roughly circular. It is estimated that the contaminant plume consists of approximately 300 cubic yards of soil. This value was determined by calculating the volumes of horizontal disks of various radii which approximate the shape of the plume. Any clean soil excavated will be stockpiled for backfill. The remediation plan described below will deal primarily with contaminated soil · extending from the surface to a depth of approximately 27.5 feet. REMEDIATION PLAN This remediation plan involves excavating the contaminated soil and transporting the contaminated soil to a recycling facility. The excavation will be backfilled with clean sandy material. The contaminated soil will be removed to a depth of approximately 27.5 feet and out radially from the center of the tank location for a distance of approximately 10 feet. The contaminated soil will be removed with a excavator backhoe. It is estimated that approximately 300 cubic yards (450 tons) of contaminated soil will be excavated. Upon excavating to the limits described, one soil sample will be collected from the base of the excavation and four samples will be collected from the sidewalls. The sidewalls of the excava- tion will be vertical and are expected to be relatively stable. The samples will be collected from the backhoe and placed in glass jars, sealed with a Teflon lined lid, labeled, stored in an ice chest at 4°C, and transported to BC Laboratories for analyses. The samples will be analyzed as previously described. If the results of the analyses indicate that the soil at the bottom and on the sidewalls of the excavation is "clean" no additional soil will be removed and removal of the contaminated soil will be complete. The property is fenced and the gates will be locked at the end of each work day. · The excavated soil will be stockpiled near the excavation on an asphalt parking area. · Transporting the contaminated soil to the recycling facility will begin as soon as possible. It will take less than two days to transport the contaminated soil to the recycling facility. · QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure quality of data obtained from a sample. Each sample will be collected in a glass jar, preserved correctly for the intended analysis and stored for no longer than the permissible holding time prior to analysis. Protocols · for this project have been described within the work plan. Sample identification and chain of custody procedures are designed to assure sample quality and to document sample possession. The container for each sample submitted for analysis will be labeled with the identifying number. The analytical laboratory will assign a separate sample · number unique to that sample for internal sample coordination and identification. A description of the sample including the sample number and other pertinent information regarding its collection and/or geologic significance will be written in field notes being prepared by the site geologist. These field documents will be kept in a permanent project file. All samples will be analyzed by BC Laboratories for the analysis requested. A properly completed chain of custody record will be submitted to the analytical laboratory along with the samples. The laboratories assigned number will be properly entered on the form. 9 A quality control officer at the laboratory will verify integrity of samples submitted, proper · sample volume, correctness of containers used, and properly executed chain of custody record. Pertinent information will be entered into a log book kept by the laboratory. · In addition to routine calibration of analytical instruments with standards and blanks, the analyst is required to run duplicates and spikes of 10% of analyses to assure an added measure of · reliability and precision. Accuracy is verified through the following: 1. U.S. EPA and State certification of results. 2. Participation in inter-laboratory round programs. 3. Blind samples are submitted for analysis by the quality control officer on a weekly basis. These are prepared from National Bureau of Standards specifications of EPA reference standards. ~ 4. Verification of results with an alternative method. SITE SAFETY PLAN Appendix A contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with Worker Right to Know Regulations · and CAC Title 26. ~O~'~NX Submitted by: /~ / Duane R. Smith ~'x~/t Registered Geologist c:~w~w~w~x,cs~L~s~~ State of California No.3584 lo APPENDIX A SITE SAFETY PLAN SITE SAFETY PLAN REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE Introduction A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the remediation of oil contaminated soil. Its purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment, standard decontamination procedures, and emergency action plans. The purpose of this work is to excavate the contaminated soil and transport to a recycling facility for disposal. The excavation work will completed by: MP Environmental Services, Incorporated 3400 Manor Street Bakersfield, California The SSP describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from contamination or personal injury while conducting on-site activities. Site Background An underground cutting oil storage tank was located on the property. Soil contamination associated with the tank was identified during the characterization study. Responsibilities of Key Personnel Ail personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Duane Smith, a California registered geologist, will serve as project manager, field technician, and site safety officer (SSO). Mr. Smith will assure that all on-site personnel have a copy of the site safety plan. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the site safety plan will be monitored at all times. A training session will be conducted to assure that all personnel are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be made aware · of hazards at the site. Mr. Smith will be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting soil samples, and following chain-of-custody protocol. On-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After documenting understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are qualified. Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. Job Hazard Analysis Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple precau- · tions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. Only excavation company personnel will perform the excavation work. Only qualified personnel will have any contact with the equipment. All on-site personnel are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to any equipment. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor contamination levels detected on-site exceed action levels as determined using a PID. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 25 ppm in the breathing zone. Furthermore, no smoking, open flame, or sparks will be permitted during drilling operations in order to prevent' accidental ignition. ' No personnel will be allowed into the excavation. All personnel will keep a safe distance for the edge of the excavation. The property is fenced and locked during none working hours. Risk Assessment Summary_ · It is expected that exposure to chemicals on-site will be limited to oil and some possible volatiles. These chemical represent a minor hazard because they may be are slightly toxic. The Threshold Limits Values (TLV), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL), and Toxicity levels, all in ppm, are listed below: Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 42100 · Exposure Monitoring Plan A Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the excavation. Should concentrations exceed TLV levels, work will be stopped until protective measures have be taken. Personal Protective Equipment Hard hats will be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of any equipment. A-3 Work Zones and Security Measures Access to the area of investigation will be restricted to authorized personnel. The project manager will be responsible for site security. · Decontamination Measures Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense · dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possible contaminated soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck, and face with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site. If respirators are used, they will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample is collected. General Safe Work Practices On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. The project manager will oversee operations and act as the sample coordinator to assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. Training Requirements · The SSO will inform all personnel on site of contaminant properties, health hazard data, risk from exposure, and emergency first aid. All chemicals present will be discussed and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. ]Medical Surveillance Program According .to 29 CFR 1910.120 Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators 30 days or more during one year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above estab- lished permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. Record Keeping Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training. Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet requirements. · Included will be names and social security number of employees, first aid administered, and personal air monitoring records. · ContinRencv Plans In the event of accident, injury, or other emergency, the project manager, or other person will notify appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: 1. Bakersfield City Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 · Mr. Howard Wines (805) 326-3979 2. Kern County Sheriffs Department, Fire Department, or Paramedics Dial 91 l 3. Mercy Hospital 22 ! 5 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California (805) 632-5000 We, the undersigned, have read the preceding Site Safety Plan, and agree, by signing below, that we understand the Site Safety Plan and will adhere to the safety standards established in the Site Safety Plan. 1. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 2. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 3. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 4. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 5. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 6. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. SMITH- GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Geologists Post Office Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 (805) 871-3207 November 22, 1994 Mr. Howard H. Wines City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear Mr. Wines: Enclosed is my work plan for characterization of oil contaminated soil on the D-J Manufacturing property located at 1500 East California Avenue. Also included is copy of our company flier and resumes for the compamy principals, Duane R. Smith and Thomas F. Gutcher. If you have any questions regarding the work plan, please feel free to call. Duane R. Smith SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN D--J MANUFACTURING. INCORPORATED B.AKERSFI ELD. CA.LI FeRN IA NOVEMBER 199q · SMITH-GUTCHER ~I ND ~15S O CI/t TES, INC. Consulting Geologists · Post Office Box 60706 Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 (805) 871-3207 FAX (805) 871-3698 · SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION Description of Sile D-J Manufacturing is located at 1500 East California Avenue, Bakersfield, Kern County, · California. The site is situated in the southern half of Section 29, T.29S., R.28E., M.D.B.& M. The site location is shown on Figure 1. The property consists of an office building and a large machine shop. Most of the ground surface is covered by asphalt or concrete. One underground storage tank was removed from the property on February 9, 1994. The tank was concrete and used to store cutting oil. It had a capacity of approximately 6,000 gallons. There was no dispenser associated with the tank. A pipeline ran from the tank into the machine · shop. The pipeline also has been removed up to the south edge of the shop. The former tank location relative to the machine shop is shown on Figure 2. · No products other than that listed are known to have been stored in the tank. Preliminary Site Assessment Results Following the tank removal, four soil samples were collected from beneath the bottom of the tank. The samples were collected at two locations below the tank. One sample location was near the northeast edge of the tank and the other was near the southeast edge. Samples were · collected at depths of 2 and 6 feet below the bottom of the tank at each location. The samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) using EPA Method 418.1 and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTX&E) using EPA Method 5030/8020. 1 ....... ~,~,. ~ '~.'.',,'1~~ ~1 ' '~% . j/ ~-. - ~ ~ ,, ~/,, .... ,x:,~.,~.~,J .,' '..,..,. .. ~ = , ' ., . .~. -~ .,, - ~ -' ~_ .., ,-.~ , , . - , . . Jl~~' .' ,-,' Ii / II 7ML-. ~ lr ~~~~ ~~N~x '~~F'-.~ , ~11' .-~ "~' ~ --- ~ ~d F ..... ~ ...... I I E_ ~~lF I1~ ~,~= ~ , L II , . JL SCALE 1:24,000 1 ~ 0 I MILE m m m I m i m { m I I I ~ 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 ~000 6000 7000 FEET ~ ~ M I I I I I I I CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 TO 20 FEET (INTERVAL DIFFERS OE~NDINO ON QUAORANQLEI NATIONAL QEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1 O-d MANUFA~TU~IN~ IN~O~O~ATEO 8AKE~B~IELO~ :ALI~ORNIA ~ouree of ~ase Map: U.S.~.S. Oil~le, Oil Cente~, Gosford, and ~ont 7~ M~u~ To~sraphic ~drRngle~, l~f4, photorevised 1968 and 197~. ~[gu:e Z TANK LOGATION MAP D-J MANUFAI~TURING, INI~ORPORATED BAKERSFIELD, r_,ALIFORNIA Scale: 1"= 20' SMITIt -GUTCIIER AND ASSOCIATES - NOVEMBER 1994 Figure 2 The samples, were analyzed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. The analytical results are included as Appendix A. Significant soil contamination was detected beneath the tank. The 2 and 6 foot soil samples from the northeast edge contained TPH concentrations of 56,000 mg/kg and 11,000 mg/kg, respectively. The 2 and 6 foot samples for the southeast edge contained TPH concentrations of 50,000 mg/kg and 25,000 mg/kg, respectively. Minor levels of toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes were detected in the samples. No benzene was detected in the samples above the minimum reporting level. Photographs showed contaminated soil within the tank excavation. SITE GEOLOGY According to the Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet (Division of Mines and Geology, 1965), the site is situated over Recent alluvial fan deposits. In general, these sediments consist of unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. According to the Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply 'Report, 1992, the depth to groundwater below the property is approximately 180 feet. There is no known shallow groundwater in the general area. Groundwater quality within the unconfined aquifer below the property is fair to poor. The quality within the confined aquifer is good. The groundwater gradient below the property appears to be to the southeast. CHARACTERIZATION PLAN Soil Sampling Plan Three test holes are proposed to assess the vertical and lateral extent and the degree of contamination beneath the former tank location. The proposed boring locations are shown on Figure 3. ;l'est Hole No. 1 will be located near the center of the former tank location. Test Hole Nos. 2 and 3 are offset borings intended to acquire data to delineate the lateral extent of 2 TEST HOLE LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SMFIll -GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES. NOVEMBER 1994 · Figure 3 contamination. The locations of Test Hole Nos. 2 and 3 may very slightly based on the field screening of soil samples from Test Hole No. 1. For the purpose of planning, each test hole will be drilled to a depth of 50 feet. Drilling will terminate if the contaminated soil is penetrated before a depth of 50 feet is reached. Autho- rization of the client will be needed to continue drilling if the contamination exceeds a depth of 50 feet. Soil samples will be collected at 5 foot intervals starting at a depth of 10 feet below the surface. The sample intervals may be modified slightly depending on soil conditions, however, they should not deviate significantly from the intended depths. Approximately 27 soil samples will be collected and field-screened. Selected soil samples will be analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPA Method 418.1). The soil samples will be analyzed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield. The quality assurance and quality control of the laboratory are available from the laboratory upon request. Chain of custody records documenting sample handling will be included. Soil samples will be collected using a split-spoon core sampler driven into the soil utilizing a truck-mounted hollow stem auger rig (Mobile Drill B-53). The split-spoon sampler holds three two and one-half inch diameter by six inch long brass liners. The core sampler will be driven through the proper interval after the hole is drilled to the sample depth with the hollow stem auger. The sampler will then be removed from the drilling equipment and the brass liners removed from the sampler. The ends of one liner from each sample depth will be covered with Teflon seals and · polyethylene caps and then secured with duct tape. The liner will then be labeled and placed in a polyethylene sample bag and the bag sealed and labeled. Each bagged liner will be placed on blue ice and retained in a chilled state for delivery to the laboratory. 3 Another soil sample from each sample depth will be retained for field screening and soil descriptions using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Field screening will consist of a headspace reading for hydrocarbon vapors with an Hnu photoionization detector (PID). In addition to the headspace readings, hydrocarbon odors, if present, will be noted. · The augers will be steam-cleaned between test holes. The sampling equipment will be scrubbed, washed and thoroughly rinsed between each sample collection. Test holes that encounter contaminated soil will be backfilled with sand-cement slurry. Contaminated drill cuttings, as identified by field screening, will be placed in DOT drums for future treatment or disposal by · the client. SITE SAFETY PLAN The Site Safety Plan is included as Appendix B. · /~,~~_~,,O,,,._N~ _ Submitted by: . \ ~\ No. &584 1~" I- Duane R. Smith · .~k~_~,.~ ~/,.~fl Registered Geologist ' \'/'z,,~ _~^q~ State of California No. 3584 D-JMFG.PLN 4 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS FPOI.1 1.1~ EIIUIP, OIIHEUTIqL 10. 28. 1994 14-' 19 P. Total ~rolewa 'aya~ooa~bone g~le ye, ~rt~btoa, :,.~-oz sox& ~-2, ~h~v o~ 2.~-~, A~ lo,~o~ ~y D~ .'8~le , ~ ~rt.x': ~ To~al ~et: ~ydro, ,azbo~ ~$000. mg/kg 20000... 1~A-418.1 , . I ' "'x' '"",..,..,",,. ' ', ,,,,, ,' ' '"' j 'f. '" ",t, ':.'..i '~ I. '.'" '. r .... I. "~T" '.... ~ ' * i" ; '''''''[' ' ~' ['"" ), '. '/. ' '< ',,i ""< '~:: ~'".,, ' '~' '.'. ,.[ i ,.: " ':~.',i,,.i ": "':~'. ,] t ..., i ..... ~ '",,, ',' .' ,1 .~ ,' ", l, '.'...F ~. ':,~,. ...... ,:..... ,. ..(,.. ":;',! '"'.,:'"", ":"'i;" ',,; ..... '.r' for ~ o~ebdvo t ,. ~f ~e eubmlen~ ~. M Le~eede~, I~e. a~Ju~ne~ aa ,eel~naa~l,Y fe~ ~e~t almm~sn, eepe/e~en, ~eum, men(er FP, Ot,! I,IF' EIIUIPOIII'IEIITClL lg.2.CJ.l?94 14;19 FROH lip EtI~Jl OIIHIEIITIqL 18.28. ?ora! ~e~$1eum llydrocarb~ne { ~thod Hydr o~ a~ i 8 0 0 0 o .* mg/k~ 4 0 0 0. ~ PR- 41 O. t FPOH HP EIIUIPOtlItEHTRL 10.2S. 1994 t4.'2! P. 5 '~l~ ~ "~J~sf~.~--~. 0~0~ . L~ ~ 04-01420-4 , ' :' I ~oJ~. J~OO. ~/kg 4000 ~ J~A-41~. 1'.' .: ' '~} ~ ~'..~q}..~..:.,,;.;:~.:.::~""" ' ~' 'Ltl' :. , . ' ' . ~' . - ' ~:,J' ~ ".~-'~=~,! '. ,1~ ~,'.~.' '.:'~ · ', '..... '., . ,~. ' J · . . .... j ,~ . ~, . ,., ., , ~ / / '",';,'i ' ",, .: '.=.',' ~ '.1 '.! ~al ~e~role~ Znd/v/~ ~i o~t~i~uen~e by IPA ~ 10t0/8020. : :' .Mtntmum: , 1 Hi h z~portod P~'I ~e ~0 hi~ hy~oeaF~n ~ekgro~a. FP, OI'I MP EIIU~POIIMEtlTClL 10.25. ]994 ~4;22 P. 7 ~ · I I I ~ge~lo ~~a ,' / i Collected ~e~/ved ~ ~b, C~le~ed, ' " MAnim~ · B~hF1 · Ben~ene No~ Do~ee~ed ~/kg , . .~ ,., ,~,~..,,~. : ....... .,., : ~ :~ ~:~;~?'""?' '.,, ',,.:.,.:;<,.-'.,. , ',.,..:,,,. .,'.'. ~, '~:.' '.r:,] 'x..,[ .~ '~,.'.:.' ' ".'~ L ", ~ "~..: ......... ,, ~ ,,, ~o~ol Hi fh r~r~od P~'g duo to high ~rooarbon baokg~o~d. :'" , . ~ .J~ ", ', ,,, ,' , %.;~q , ~' -% ,*..' ,,~'~ ':' , ,~ .-- .... - .......... ,- ,':ri '.; ' ,' ',. I ' : · ~.:."... { '.[..' . ' .. Depar~ .up~l.o~ '. ,, · '- ' · ~,,- ',, . ',, .! ;~ ' . / '".,':,'/.'~ ~-~ ' '~:,'"" '~'::.'.', ~,i · , ' I ";: . ' '"~,' ': ..".~1: FI~OH /'IP EIIUIP, OHHEIITIqL 10.28. 1994 14~23 P. %nd/vAt ~al eo~et/tuenbw ~ ~h~ SO]O/OO20. APPENDIX B · SITE SAFETY PLAN SITE SAFETY PLAN D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELI)S, CALIFORNIA Introduction A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site investigation work. Its purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment, standard decontamination procedures, and emergency action plans. · The purpose of this work is to investigate the degree and extent of oil-contaminated soil. Smith- Gutcher and Associates, Inc. plans on drilling three soil borings around an abandoned underground storage tank facility. The borings will be drilled by: · Melton Drilling Company 1701 Downing Avenue Bakersfield, California 93306 C-57 license number 508270. The SSP describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from contamination or personal injury while conducting on-site activities. · Site Background One underground storage tank was removed from the site in February 1994. Significant soil · contamination was identified beneath the tank following its removal. Responsibilities of Key Personnel All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Duane Smith or Tom Gutcher, California registered geologists, will serve as Project Manager, field technician, and site safety officer (SSO). Mr. Smith or Mr. Gutcher will assure that all on-site personnel have a copy of · the site safety plan. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the site safety plan will be monitored at all times. A training session will be conducted to assure that all personnel are aware of safe work practic- es. In the training session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site. Mr. Smith or Mr. Gutcher will be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting soil samples, and following chain-of-custody protocol. On-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After documenting understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are qualified. Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. Job Hazard Analysis Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. · A contractor (Melton Drilling Company) will be employed to drill and sample four soil borings. Only qualified personnel will have any contact with the drilling and sampling equipment. All on-site personnel, including the contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to the drilling equipment. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn B-2 · if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using a PID. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 10 ppm in the breathing zone: Furthermore, no · smoking, open flame, or sparks will be permitted during drilling operations in order to prevent accidental ignition. Risk Assessment Summary · Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include oil and toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, and other constituents of used water soluble cutting oil. These chemicals represent a minor hazard · because they are moderately toxic and can be flammable. The Threshold Limits Values (TLV), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL), and toxicity levels, all in ppm, are listed below: · Compound TLV STEL Toxicity Benzene 10 25 4894 · , Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 4300 Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. · Exposure Monitoring Plan A Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV levels, protective measures will be taken. Personal Protective Equipment · Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed. Hard hats will be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of the drilling equipment. Work Zones and Security Measures Access to the area of investigation will be restricted to authorized personnel. The Project · Manager will be responsible for site security. Decontamination Measures Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possible contaminated soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck, and face with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site. If respirators are used, they will be washed with soap and · water following each day's use. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample is collected. General Safe Work Practices On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. · The Project Manager will oversee operations and act as the sample coordinator to assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. Training Requirements The SSO will inform all personnel on site of contaminant properties, health hazard data, risk from exposure, and. emergency first aid. All chemicals present will be discussed and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. Medical Surveillance Program According to 29 CFR 1910.120 Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators 30 days or more during one year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. · Record Keeping Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training. Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet requirements. Included will be names and social security number of employees, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons, and personal air monitoring records. Conlingencv Plans In the event of accident, injury, or other emergeficy, the Project Manager, or other person will · notify appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: 1. City of Bakersfield 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 B-5 Mr. Howard Wines (805) 326-3911 · 2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance - Emergency 911 3. Memorial Hospital 420 34th Street Bakersfield, California · (805) 327-1792 We, the undersigned, have read the preceding Site Safety Plan, and agree, by signing below, that we understand the Site Safety Plan and will adhere to the safety standards established in the Site Safety Plan. 1. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 2. Name (Signature) Date Name {Printed) Social Security No. · 3. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 4. Name (Signature) Date Name (Printed) Social Security No. 5. Name (Signature) Date · Name (Printed) Social Security No. 6. Name (Signature) Date · Name (Printed) Social Security No. D-JMFG.SSP B-6 SITE CHARACTERIZATION ~ST'UDY D--J MANUFACTURING. INC. 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA JANUARY 1995 By. · -- SMITH-GUTCHER ~ AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -Consulting Goolog/sts Post Office ~ox ~070~ BakorsfiPd; California 0338~-070~ (805) 87~-3207 · TABLE OF CONTENTS · Page Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Site Background ............................................................................................. 2 Former Underground Tank Site ................................................................. 2 Preliminary Site Assessment Results ........................................................... 2 ~ Site Geology ................................................................................................. 3 Investigation Procedures .................................................................................... 3 Drilling and Sampling .............................................................................. 3 Results of Site Characterization .......................................................................... 4 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 6 · Recommendations .............................................................................................. 7 Exhibits: Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Tank Location Map Figure 3 Test Hole Location Map · Figure 4 Cross Section A-B Figure 5 Cross Section Location Map Appendix A Analytical Results, Preliminary Site Assessment · Appendix B Logs of Test Holes Appendix C Analytical Results, Tank Sludge Appendix D Analytical Results, Site Characterization Study O c:\wp51 \filen\files94\D-JMFO.TOC SITE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION A site characterization study has been performed for a former underground storage tank site located at D-J Manufacturing, Incorporated, 1500 East California Avenue, Bakersfield, Kern County, California. The site is situated in the southwest quarter of Section 28, T.29S., R.28E., M.D.B.& M. The site location is shown on Figure 1. Land uses nearby include commercial facilities and some residential. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the degree and extent of soil contamination resulting from unauthorized releases of cutting oil into the subsurface at the site. This investi- gation included an inspection of the site, drilling and logging of three test holes, chemical analyses of eleven soil samples, research of existing data, and the preparation of this report by Mr. Duane R. Smith, Registered Geologist No. 3584. Handbook #UT~35, Site Characterization and Remediation, prepared by the Environmental Health Services Department, County of Kern, was followed in the preparation of this report. The site characterization work plan completed in November 1994 was approved by the Bakersfield City Fire Department, the lead regulatory agency. The investigation reported herein has been conducted in accordance with generally recognized and current state-of-the-art geological procedures. The geological factors that were considered are outlined in this report. Other geological factors were not considered inasmuch as they were not deemed relevant to the intended land use and scope of this investigation. This investigation was conducted to the best of the investigative geologist's abilities in accordance with the foregoing limitations. 1 SCALE 1:24,OOO 1 ½ O 1 MILE 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 TO 20 FEET IIf41'ERVAL DIFFERS DEPENDING ON QUADRANGLE! NAlrIOt~AL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM or 1929 LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Source of Base Map: U.S.G,S, Oildale, Oil Center, Gosford, and L,amont 7'fi Minute Tnp~)grnphie ~ndrangle.~, 1954, ph.torevised 1968 and lq73. Figure I SITE BACKGROUND O Former Underground Tank Site One underground storage tank was removed from the property (see Figure 2). The tank was constructed of concrete and was used to store used cutting oil. It had a capacity of approximate- ly 6,000 gallons. The tank was removed on February 9, 1994. There was no dispehser associated with the tank. A drain line approximately 20 feet in length ran from the building to the tank No products other than cutting oil are known to have been stored in the tank. There are no known repairs to the tank or piping, or past leaks. Preliminary Sile Assessment Resnlts Following the tank removal, four soil samples were collected from beneath the bottom of tank. The samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and BTX&E. The samples were analyzed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. The analytical results are included as Appendix A. Significant soil contamination was detected beneath the tank. The 2 and 6 foot soil samples form the northeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 56,000 rog/kg and 11,000 rog/kg, respectively. The 2 and 6 foot samples from the southeast end of the tank contained TRPH concentrations of 50,000 rog/kg and 25,000 rog/kg, respectively. Minor concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected in the samples. No benzene was detected in the samples above the minimum reporting level. Due to the high concentration of contaminants in the soil below the tank, the Bakersfield City Fire Department required further characterization of the contamination. 2 TANK LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTUI=IING~ INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA Scale: I"= 20' S/Il.III'Il -(;UTCHER AND ASSOCIATES - NOYEI~IBER 1994, Figure 2 SITE GEOLOGY According to the Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet (Jennings and others, 1963), the site is situated over Recent alluvial fan deposits. In general, these sediments consist of unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. The sediments encountered in the three test holes drilled at the site consist mostly of brown to light brown, sand, silty sand, and silt. The sediments are loose to dense and appear highly to moderately permeable. The sediments are moist to slightly moist. Logs of the test holes are included as Appendix B. According to the Kern County Water Agency, Water Supply Report, 1992, the depth to groundwater below the property is approximately 180 feet. There is no known shallow groundwater in the general area. Groundwater quality within the unconfined aquifer below the · property is fair to poor. The quality within the confined aquifer is good. The groundwater gradient below the property appears to be to the southeast. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES · Drilling and Sampling · Three test holes were drilled on January 17, 1995 to assess the vertical and lateral extent and the degree of contamination at the former tank site. Figure 3 shows the boring locations. Test Hole No. 1 was located over the approximate center of the tank location. Test Hole Nos. 2 and 3 were perimeter borings intended to provide data to determine the lateral extent of the contaminant plume. Test Hole No. 2 was moved 4 feet east of the original location due to a steel pipeline encountered at a depth of one foot. Test Hole No. 1 was drilled to a depth of 45 feet. Test Hole Nos. 2 and 3 were each drilled to a depth of 40 feet. Soil samples were collected at depths of I0, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 feet in Test Hole No. 1. Samples were collected at depths of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 feet in Test Hole · No. 2. In Test Hole No. 3, samples were collected at depths of 10, 15, 25, 30, 35, and 40 feet. 3 TEST HOLE LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 15OO EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA S1;HTIt -GUTCIIER AND ASSOCIATES - JANUARY 1995 Figure 3 Soil samples were collected using a split-spoon sampler driven into the soil utilizing a truck- mounted 8 inch diameter hollow-stem auger rig (Mobile Drill B-53). The split-spoon sampler holds three 2.5 inch diameter by 6 inch long brass liners. The sampler was driven through the proper sampling interval utilizing a 140 pound drop-hammer after the hole was drilled with the hollow-stem, auger. The sampler was then removed from the drilling equipment and the brass liners removed from the sampler. The ends of the bottom liner from each sample depth were covered with Teflon seals and polyethylene caps. The liner was then labeled and placed in a polyethylene sample bag and the bag sealed and labeled. Each bagged liner was immediately placed in an ice chest on blue ice and retained for laboratory analyses. · The soil from the middle liner from each sample depth was used for field screening and soil descriptions. Field screening consisted of a headspace reading for hydrocarbon vapors with an Hnu photoionization detector (PID) using a 10.2 eV lamp. In addition to the headspace readings, hydrocarbon odors, if detected, were noted. The samples were geologically logged following the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The augers were steam-cleaned after drilling each test hole. The sampling equipment was · scrubbed, washed, and thoroughly rinsed between each sample collection. Contaminated drill cuttings, as identified by field screening, were retained in DOT drums for future treatment or disposal. Test Hole Nos. 1 and 3 were backfilled with bentonite chips. RESULTS OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION Eleven of the soil samples collected from the three test holes were submitted for chemical analyses. The samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). Samples 01, 04, and 05 from Test Hole No. 1 were also analyzed for copper, aluminum, and zinc. Based on a discussion with Mr. John Stockton, D-J Manufacturing machines almost entirely aluminum and brass fittings. I was informed by Mr. Dan Schultz of BC Laboratories 4 that brass consists of approximately 70% aluminum and 30% zinc. Appendix C contains an analyses of the tank sludge. The sludge sample was analyzed for arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. Only barium, at a concentration of 0.33 rog/l, was detected above the practical quantitative limits. Based on the above information, two soil samples with the highest field screening levels were analyzed for aluminum, copper, and zinc. This would appear to identify the possible heavy metals of concern if they exist below the tank location. The TRPI-I analyses were performed using EPA Method 418.1. The metal analyses were performed using SW 6010. The analyses were conducted by BC Laboratories. The analytical results and chain of custody records are included as Appendix D. Table 1 lists a summary of the analytical results. The samples from 10, 25, 30, 40, and 45 feet in Test Hole No. 1 were submitted for analyses. Field screening indicated possible hydrocarbon contamination from near the surface to a depth of 30 feet (see Appendix B). The 10 foot sample (Sample 01) reportedly contained 16,000 mg/kg TRPH. The 25 foot soil sample (Sample 04) reportedly contained 130,000 mg/kg TRPH. The 30, 40, and 45 foot samples (Samples 05, 07, and 08) contained no detectable TRPH (see Appendix A). The samples from 20, 30, and 40 feet in Test Hole No. 2 were submitted for analyses. Field screening indicated no contaminants in this test hole. No TRPH was detected in the soil samples (Samples 11, 13, and 15) (see Appendix D). The samples from 15, 25, and 35 feet in Test Hole No. 3 were submitted for analyses. Field screening indicated only slight contamination from a depth of approximately 5 feet to 20 feet (see Appendix B). The 15 foot soil sample (Sample 17) reportedly contained 56 mg/kg TRPH. No TRPH was detected in the 25 foot (Sample 18) or 35 foot (Sample 20) soil samples (see Appendix D). 5 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS · D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED 1500 EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE Test Hole Depth TRPH Copper Zinc Aluminum (feet) EPA 418.1 SW-6010 SW-6010 SW-6010 I0 16,000 3.0 14 2,990 · 25 130,000 30 60 11,900 Test Hole 30 ND 16 19 2,330 No. 1 ~ 45 ND 20 ND Test Hole 30 ND No. 2 ~ 40 ND 15 56 Test Hole 25 ND No. 3 35 ND Concentrations are in rog/kg. TRPH - Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND - None Detected Table 1 c:\wp5 ! \files\files94\D-JMFG.RES Samples 01, 04, and 05 reportedly contained copper concentrations of 3.0 rog/kg, 30 rog/kg, and 16 mg/kg, respectively. The samples reportedly contained zinc concentrations of 14 rog/kg, 60 mg/kg, and 19 rog/kg, respectively. Samples 01 and 04 reportedly contained aluminum concentrations of 2,990 mg/kg and 11,900 mg/kg, respectively. These concentrations were in samples that contained TRPH concentrations of 16,000 rog/kg and 130,000 rog/kg. Sample 05 reportedly contained an aluminum concentration of 2,330 rog/kg. This concentration was in a sample that contained no detectable TRPH above a minimum reporting level of 20 rog/kg. Copper and zinc concentrations do not appear to present a hazard in the three samples due to the low concentrations. Based on the concentrations, no detectable soluble copper or zinc should be present in the soils. The aluminum concentration in Sample 05 appears to be a background level based on "none detected" for TRPH in the same sample. The cutting oil would be the only transportation medium for the metals used in the manufacturing processes. Water as a · transportation medium would not be a factor since the entire property is covered by asphalt or concrete and there are no shallow disposal wells on the property. There does not appear to be a TTLC or STLC action level for aluminum. It would not appear to be any more of a environmental problem than zinc which has a TTLC level of 5,000 mg/kg. Since it has no TTLC or STLC action levels, it appears that state or federal agencies consider it to be less of an environmental problem than zinc. The 16 rog/kg and 19 rog/kg concentrations for copper and zinc would also appear to be background levels at a depth of approximately 30 feet. CONCLUSIONS Cross section A-B is shown on Figure 4 and depicts a vertical profile of the contaminant plume. Figure 5 shows the location of cross section A-B through Test Hole Nos. 2, 1, and 3. Figure 5 also shows the approximate areal extent of the contaminated soil at a depth of 15 feet. · Subsurface migration of contaminants appears to have been controlled primarily by the influence of gravity. The lithology beneath the site appears to have had little influence on contaminant migration. All of the sediments encountered in the test holes were highly to moderately · permeable. No significant permeability barriers were noted. 6 C:i:::II::)S~S SIEI:::TIC)N A = El O-J MANUFACI'URING$ INCORI'~ORATEO · NO CROSS SECTION LOCATION MAP D-J MANUFACTURING, INOORPORATED · 15OO EAST CALIFORNIA AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SMITIt -GUTCIIER AND ASSOCIATES - JANUARY 1995 · Figure 5 The maximum vertical extent of the vadose zone contaminant plume is estimated to be approximately 27.5 feet below the ground surface centered beneath the former tank location (Figure 5). The maximum areal extent of the contaminant plume is estimated to approximately 18 feet at a depth of 15 feet (Figure 4). It is estimated that the contaminant plume consists of approximately 300 cubic yards of soil. This estimate is based on the extent of the contaminated soil shown on Figures 4 and 5. RECOMMENDATIONS Three possible remedial alternatives for this site are no action, excavation and disposal, or excavation and aeration. The no action alternative is an acceptable method at this site. The top of the primary groundwater table is approximately 155 feet below the base of the contaminant plume. The surface of the site is covered by asphalt and concrete and is fenced commercial property with very limited access to the public. The general area is also occupied by mostly commercial properties. It should also be pointed out that the nature of the contaminants (cutting oil) indicates a lack of volatile constituents. Possible vapors migrating towards the surface would be very minor to none existent. I am not aware of any state of federal publications dealing with leaching potential analysis or general risk appraisal of oil contaminated soils. Analysis of the risk form oil contaminated soil is generally left to the local regulatory agency (Bakersfield City Fire Department) and handled on case by case basis. If the contamination is left in-place, the owner of the property would continue to be libel for any possible effects on the environment. Excavation and disposal of the contaminated soil is an acceptable remedial alternative. Based on a cost of $200.00 per cubic yard to excavate, transport, and dispose (recycle) of the estimated total of 300 cubic yards of contaminated soil, it would cost approximately $60,000.00 to · complete remediation. This figure is considered somewhat conservative due to the distance that the contaminated soil would have to be transported. Also, it is likely that the actual amount of soil to be excavated would exceed the estimated 300 cubic yards of contaminated soil because · it is not practical to remove only the contaminated soil. 7 The third option, excavation and aeration, involves excavating the contaminated soil and spreading it in a thin layer across a portion of the property to allow natural degradation of the hydrocarbons. This method works somewhat poorly with oil contaminated soil. The best results would occur during the summer months. There is limited open space on the property and the soil would have to be spread in a thicker layer and aeration would take much longer to co~nplete. The cost for this remediation method would probably be less than $50,000 but could take several months to complete. Based on the foregoing evaluations, the no action alternative seems to be the most appropriate remedial alternative for this site. The second and third remediation options are not acceptable at this time because they are not cost-effective or desirable. · ~ tx Submitted by: / \ [~ ~o. ;a~n4 ]~ ] Duane R. Smith · ~"~__o~X~ ./,~.~/ Registered Geologist State of California No. 3584 SITE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY D-J MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 1995 c:X, mg\fi~es~files94\DJ M FG.Ci i^ ANLALYTICAL RESULTS PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT FPOII lip EIIUIPOIIIIEIIIflL 10.2..q. !?74 14: I? P. 3 I : X90~ ~ ~F~IT .Re~OFtt H~dro~ar~hn ~ 0000 ' mg/k~ 4000, ~ ~A- 4 ~. O. t rPOU Ur' EIIK'IPOIIIIEIIT~IL I~. 2.R. I??,I 14::21 F'. ~ '. ' D~te Sm~e Uat:e ff~le Oa~e ~aly.i~ -1' '" /0~/~ 0~/o~/.¢ om/~e/~& .... ' ~,' " Mini.mum: ~, I . :i : · ' ~ ....... .?;.,i ":.'~. ',~ . ~1~011 I'IP I[lll) ll:'Olll11~llTfl~ 1~.~,.°,. 1994 t . Pargeable Aro~atlea " and ?o~al ~ee~.oleum ~yd~oe&t-bone .g~16 ~ot erip~i~, ~l-O4-O~ OOZL ~-~' ~LED O~ 2-0-04 AT 10~7~ BY D~ ' ' lddiVt~ual ~e~l~u~n~8 ~ ePA He,hod 80JO/~OlO. ', , ~,~:.'.?~.,.....~,~ ... :~ -I I . Sthyl' Ben]erie ~one Doeeeeee ~/k9 O'fq f ,. ,; 'Total X~l~nsg O. ~0 ', ~; ' :,: f '.' ~O~Ot Hi )h rep~rtod PQ~' m ~l ~o high ~rooarbon baokgzovn~. . , ,...:....,~ .; . i.. ' "'"; A- 6 '... '"' .,: ~ ., "FO~L!. ~e~:~ro~.atrm M~nLm~ · '.I~1 Ben~eqi ~e De~eeted rog/kg " Total ~lffl6o O. g~ mg/kg 0.0~ ~ote, ~t 'h ~6por~6d ~OL'. due ~0 high hydzooar~ b~okg~. .' rl~Ot.l ttr. EIIt~I~OIIHEIITrlL 10.28.1794 14:23 P. ? · . ::' Binmen. ~On. Deteot~ ~g/k~ : ~ .~ ..... , {:~ , ' ,,..,,,,,.: .,. ~ LOGS OF TEST HOLES · LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H. No. 1 ELEVATION: 407' DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILLING RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 HSF Auger SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 45' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith SAMPLE ~, z z ~-- ~ ~ u° 5z --~ ~c ~; u_ BAKE'RSFIELO~ CALIFORNIA - ~ m O c ~ m ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION ' 0 ' . . Concrete - '.~:~ Backfill, Sand, brown, fine- to very coarse-grained, fine grevelraro, _ sm . , loose, slightly moist, no hydrocarbon odor. ~ " lonk ' Location · . '5 ~ ~ . -~ ~ [ [.': ~.'~ '. Sand, dark gray (oil stained), fine- to coarse-grained, loose, slightly sm .... · moist, strong hydrocarbon odor. _ _ ~ O1 0840 8 750 16,000 Sand, gray (o~1 stained), fine- to coarse-grained,fine gravel rare, loose, 10 sw ~. "; ' slightly moist, moderate hydrocarbon odor. '15-B 8 '." . _~ O2 0850 12 6 . ·.. · ' Same as above, slight hydrocarbon odor. 16 .'... -20- · ~ 4 . _ _~ O3 0900 26 35 ~ ~ Same as above, clay stringer (3"), moderate hydrocarbon odor. 45 - ~ Silt~ brown, sandg, fine-~rained, medium-~rained sand taro, - - se ..~'..,,.~'% moist, moderate petroleum odor. -25- ~ ~ ... '..'.'. I ~,'; ~ ,'~ Sand, light brown, fin*- to verg coarse-~rained, fino ~ravol rare, - - sw .~,' '" dense, slightlv moist, faint hydrocarbon odor (?~. ~30 '"~" "': Sheet I of 2 LC)(; CTF 'T'EE;'F LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H. No. 1 ELEVATION: 407' DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILLING RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 Auger Rig SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 45' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith Z SAMPLE ~ z = HMITH -GU O ~ :' - ~ ~ ,- ~< o ' AND A'SSCTCIATEH ~ < ; < ~ [805] 871-3~07 -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 c ~ ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION -30 -~ 14 _~ 05 0915 14 10 ND ;,'. ,'; ;'. Sand, light brown, fine- to coarse- grained, fine gravel rare,, medium 18 sw '' · ' dense, slightly moist, faint hydrocarbon odor (?), - ~...:...~ · m "..'..2.. Sand, light brown, fino- to medium-~rained, mediumdons~, - moist, no h~drocarl~on odor. -35- I ~8 "" ":"' ~ O~ O~20 ~O 4 '"" ~'' ' .... ' '" Sand, siltg, light brown, fino-~rained, medium donso, s~i~htlv moist - ~c ": "'.~ '.. no h~droearbon odor. '40 - 15 ' ' ':" '" _ _ 07 0930 29 5 ND ."; '"'"' 50 ""' :.~' '45'I . _ 08 1040 17 2 ND 24 Total Depth - 45 feet - No Groundwater Encountered Note: Soil appeared clean below a depth of approximately 30 feet. No hydrocarbon odor. Sheet LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H. No. 2 ELEVATION: 407' DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILLING RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 Auger Rig SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 40' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith Z SAMPLE ~ oZ ~ ~M~ '=rJ[=~.= G U "rc~=.~'Jl~I ~~ ~ u o- --E ~ ~ ~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ [805] 871-3~07 ~ z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O c ~ ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION ' 0 = Asphalt _ , ~. - .. Sand, brown, fin*- to eoarse~rained, fino ~rovol rare, loose, ~li~htl~ - sm ~- -.. , moist, no hydrocarbon odor. = 5 = '. .. Sand, light brown, fine- to coarse-grained, loose, slightly moist, no ~ sm · hydrocarbon odor. - . ;~,~' '10'I ~ -.' -'.. -I OO 10~$ 15 2 '- ' ~o h~droearbon odor. 17 .;' - " . . Same es above, increase in fine gravel with depth. -15- B 10 " "' _~ 10 1105 11 1 ·. ' ' No hydrocarbon odor. -20- ~ ~o ,,"... I 11 1110 17 2 ND 17 sc .;..; .,. Sand, silty, light brown, fine-grained, medium dense, slightly moist, - . ;,'.. no hydrocarbon odor. -25- = · ;.-." I _ _ 1 2 1 1 15 1 3 I : ,' '. '. - .' No hydrocarbon odor. 13 ,'' l, -.' ' ' Same es above. -30 - . ..... Sheet I of I I I LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H. No. 2 ELEVATION: 407, DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILLING RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 Auger Rig SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 40' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith SAMPLE z z - < o AND --~ ~ u - E . _ u BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA = - ~ < m < ~ [805] 871-3E07 c m ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 30' ~ 10 Sand, silty, light brown, fine-grained, medium dense, slightly moist, 13 1120 18 1 ND sc .-' "." no hydrocarbon odor. - -I ' 4 1130 28 1 . ' '-" Sand. light brown, fine- to coarse-grained, medium dense, slightly 43 sm ". ', moist, no hydrocarbon odor. 45 Total Depth - 40 feet - No Groundwater Encountered Note: Soil appeared clean from surface to total depth. ' - No hvdrocarbon odor Sheet 2 of 2 I LOG OF TEST HOLE LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H, No. 3 ELEVATION: 407' DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILL)NG RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 Auger Rig _ SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 40' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith SAMPLEE :~ o SSOCI TES ~~ ~ ~ u E ~ _ BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA c m ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION ' 0 ' Concrete (4") ' ' Sand, brown, fine- to coarse-grained, fine gravel rare, loose, slightly · .. moist, no hydrocarbon odor. · , Gray staining, moderate hydrocarbon odor. '10-~ 9 '.~ '" : Sand, gray, fine- to coarse-grained, loose, slightly moist, slight . _~ 16 1240 11 5 sm · ,' · hydrocarbon odor. _~ 17 1250 17 8 56 ' '. · Slight hydrocarbon odor. '~0- ' .' :' · Increosein silt content and less coarse s~nd with depth. _ _ 18 1300 28 5 ND Sand, light brown, fine- to coarse-grained, medium dense, slightly 32 sm ..::.: moist, '~in' hydrocarbon odor Sheet B-5 I LOCATION: D-J Manufacturing, Inc. TEST HOLE NO.: T.H. No. 3 ELEVATION: 407' DATE DRILLED: 01/17/95 DRILLING CO.: Melton Drilling Company DRILLER: Randy Walton DRILLING RIG: Mobile Drill B-53 Auger Rig SAMPLING METHOD: Split spoon with brass sleeves HOLE DIAMETER: 8+" TOTAL DEPTH: 40' FIRST WATER: None LOGGED BY: DR Smith SAMPLE ~ oz ~ ~MI TI'I-~U'T'CH~J:~I ~ ~ ~- < o AND ASSOCIATES o z ~ ~ u BAKERSFIELO~ CALIFORNIA ~ z Z 0 c ~ ~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION '30'~ 25 . .. Sand, light brown, fine- to coarse-grained, medium dense, slightly _ _ 19 1310 28 3 sm [~".' ' moist, no hydrocarbon odor. 32 .,-.'.'. . 20 1315 17 1 ND ' Sand, silty, light brown, fine-grained, medium dense, slightlv moist, ~ 29 sc '. ~ '* *.~.' no hydrocarbon odor. '40-I 12 . _ 21 1325 12 16 Tolal Depth - 40 feet - No Groundwater Encountered Note: Slight hydrocarbon odor from surface to approximately 20 - feet. Soil appeared clean below a depth of 20 feet. Sheet 2 or 2 II B-6 APPENDIX C ANALYTICAL RESULTS TANK SLUDGE EC-P Date Reported: 06/07/94 1801 OAK ST. Date Received: 05/23/94 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Laboratory No.: 94-05387-1 , ~ttn.: DAN 334-2758 TCLP TOXICITY Sample Description: D-J MFG ~C94-01 COMPOSIT FOR 4 DRUMS SAMPLED ON 5-23-94 ~ 10:30AM BY DAN Maximum Sample Results Method .Analytical Allowable Constituent~ mq/li~er P.O.L. Metho~ ~oncentration Arsenic None Detected 0.1 SW-7060 5.0 · Barium 0.33 0.1 SW-6010 100. Cadmium None Detected 0.1 SW-6010 1.0 Chromium None Detected 0.1 SW-6010 5.0 Lead None Detected 0.5 SW-6010 5.0 Mercury None Detected 0.02 SW-7471 0.20 Selenium None Detected 0.1 SW-7740 1.0 Silver None Detected 0.2 SW-6010 5.0 · Comment: All extract contaminants reported in ms/liter on a filtrate basis. Ssmple analyzed tn accordance with IIPA'S .TCLP 18-hour. extraction test. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantltation Limit (refers~to the~l~ast mount'of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique .employed) . ~.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would b~ less than the method P.Q.L.). R~FERENC~S: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes 'Physical/Chemical Methods", RPA-SW-846, Septe~er, 1986. ..: .::.:.., .!;:.. ,: ~t C IJ~BORATORIES, INC. ~epar ment Supervisor ~l'esults listed In this ~epod are for tho exclusive use of the submitting party. E~ Laboratories, Inc. assumes no respanslbllity fm report alteration, separation, detachment or third pa~/Interpretation. 4100 AU8..~ Ct. · Baker~eld, CA ~ · [[30b~ :~7~191 I · I:AX [190b--J I:91:~_7-1 ~!1B ANALYTICAL RESULTS · SITE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY LABORATORIES SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 01/31/95 Page 1 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 01/18/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-00684-1 · Attn.: DUD/gE R. SMI~"H 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. - BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 01 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMIqVH Title 22 Waete %~fpe: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261) Regulatory Criteria Method STLC TTLC · Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq Copper 3.0 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 25. 2500. Zinc 14. ms/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000. · Other Tests: Aluminum 2990. mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 Co~nent: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantltatlon Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte quantifiable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed). STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: · SW -- "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", EPA-SW-846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive uae of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Or. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-491 I · FAX (8051327-1918 LABORATORIES · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 01/31/95 Page 1 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 01/18/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95-00684-2 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 · Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 04 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS · (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261) Regulatory Criteria Method STLC TTLC Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq Copper. 30. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 25. 2500. Zinc 60. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000. Other Tests: · Aluminum 11900. mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 Cogent: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TLC) as s~ple subjected to appropriate techniques to dete~ine total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte · quantifiable based on s~ple size used and analytical technique employed). STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods"i EPA-SW-846, Septe~er, 1986. · Department Supervisor · All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submittin9 party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report altersiion, separation, detachment or third party Inlerprelation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-4911 · FAX(805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES · SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date Reported: 01/31/95 Page 1 P.O. BOX 60706 Date Received: 01/18/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Laboratory No.: 95°00684-3 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 · Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BD~KERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 05 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUD/gE SMITH Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid TOTD~L CONCENTRATIONS · (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261) Regulatory Criteria Method STLC TTLC Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mg/L mq/kq Copper 16. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 25. 2500. Zinc 19. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000. Other Tests: · Aluminum 2330. mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 · Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantltation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte · quantifiable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed). STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", EPA-SW-846, September, 1986. Department Superviso~ · All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use ot the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. ~ssumes no responsibility for report alteration, separatio,, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Cb. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 - (905] 327-491 I · FAX (905} 327-1918 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-1 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 01 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soll Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 16000. mG/kg 2000. EPA-418.1 · Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use o! the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-4911 · FAX[805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-2 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 04 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 130000. mg/kg 20000. EPA-418.1 Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · Ail results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-1 918 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab #: 95-00684-3 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 05 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · All results listed in this report are lot the exclusive use o! the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 4100 Atlas l~t. · Bskeesfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-4911 · FAX(805) 327-1~J18 LABORATORIES · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-4 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. - BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 07 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH · Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. essumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bskersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-5 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 08 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soll Method Constituents Sample Results Unit~ P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. EIC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or Ihird party Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bskersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1818 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab #: 95-00684-6 Attn.: DUD/gE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 11 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor Ail results listed in this report are for the exclusive usa. of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpret~tio.. 4100 Atlas (~t, · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-4911 · FAX [805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of · P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-7 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG.~ INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 13 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separalion, detachment or third party interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805] 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-8 Attn.: DUD/gE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 15 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUD/gE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soll Method Constituents Sample Results units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsiblllly for report alleraflon, sep;~ration, detachment or third party interpretalion. 4100 Atlas (~t. · FJakersfield. OA 93~08 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1919 LABORATORIES · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-9 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. - BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 17 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH · Sample Matrix: Soll Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 56. mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor · Alt results listed in this report are for lhe exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Lahoratortes, Inc. assumes no responaibilily for report elteration, separation, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I . FAX[B05) 327-1918 LABORATORIES Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-10 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 18 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH Sample Matrix: Soil Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · All results listed in this report are for lhe exclusive use of the submiltlng party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alleralion, separation, detachmenl or third perly Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES · Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SMITH-GUTCHER and ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of P.O. BOX 60706 Report: 01/25/95 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93386-0706 Lab ~: 95-00684-11 Attn.: DUANE R. SMITH 805-871-3207 Sample Description: D-J MFG., INC. BAKERSFIELD,CA: SAM. 20 (SOIL) 01-17-95 FROM 0840 TO 1325 HRS SAMPLED BY DUANE SMITH · Sample Matrix: Soll Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons None Detected mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor · All results listed In this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. EIC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alterat on, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas C;t. · E)aker'~field, C;A 9330B. (BO5) 32'7-481 I . FAX [BO5) .327-191B CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Location of Sampling Sample Collector Client C~ny: ~ ~ _~O~..]/~"1-O ~ Company: Smith-Butcher and Associates, Inc. Company: Address: [~'0 0 ~. ~ALI~. /J, OE Address: P.O. Box 60705 Add,ess: ,,l~A~c..~rLJ F IEC/~.~ CA · Bakersfield, California 93386-0706 Tetephone:( ) ~e[ephone: (805)871-~207 Telephone: ( ) [~ Lab Re~rts to property o.rer ~ Lab eeports to sample collector ~ Lab Reports to client [~ Billing to property ouner r~ Bitting to sample collector ~ Sitting to client Saml~ling Method: ~[~.[~) ~ ~ M PLait- Samole Ty~e: ~OI (-- Preservation: Relinquished ~:~ Company: Date and Time: Received by: Company: Date and Time: Sheet / of~ ' SMITE- BUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Location of Sampling Sample Collector Client C~ny: _.~--~ ~ Y~. , ~. C~: Smith-Gutcher and Associates, Inc. C~ny: A~r~s: /~ 0 ~. ~/~ A~ A~ress: P.O. Box 60706 A~ress: '~J~ F/~ fi ~ ~ Bakersfield, California q3386-0~6 ~ Lab Re~rts to pro~rty o~r ~ Lab Re~rts to s~te collector ~ Lab Re~rts to client ~ SitLi~ to pro~rty ~er ~ Billing to sable collector ~ Billing to cli.t SBmpling ~ethod: SBmote T~e: Prese~Btion: Relin0uished bY: ~~ f~~ Company: Smith-Gutcher and Associates, Inc. Date anO Time: /-/~-~r /0/0~ Received by: ~)~ .... ~q~~ Company: ~c' ~T Date and Time: (_(~ IO(~ Relinouished . Company: Date and Time: Received by: Company: Date and Time: Sheet ~ of ~ SMITH - GUTCHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.