HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-09/06/94 ENVlRONMElq' ,-AL HEALTH SERVICE P MENT
4? ~'-~,
STEVE McCALLEY,DiRECTOR 'R.E.H.S. ~~,,{~' ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
[ (SOS) SSl-342e FAX
September 6, 1994
Chuck Haddad Dodge
P. O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93389
Attention: C. Haddad
SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT
Haddad Dodge, 4001 California Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Haddad:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation involving the Class V Shallow
Injection Well at the above location. It is the position of this office that no further action
is required at this time.
In an effort to help you understand any liability that may still occur, please be advised that
there could be liability under other federal and state regulations or codes.
Any changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further site
characterization and mitigation activity. Please notify this agency of any changes in report
content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
If we may be of further assistance to you, please contact this Department at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve MeCalley, Director
By: Flora Darling, R.E.H.S., R.E.A.~
Hazardous Materials Specialist III
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:ch .
cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
ATTN: Martin Zeleznik
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno 'l
ATTN: Dale Essary
darlia~\h~14~l~i ~
~, Budget Unit 4113
PHOTOCOPY CHARGES
Description Charge No. of
Per Page Pages Cost
First copy (not exceeding 8~,~" x 14") $ .75
Additional copies of the same page; additional
pages of the same document or copies made $ .10
per subpoena (not exceeding 8:A" x 14") .....
-'?~ ~; , -5:9
First copy (size exceeding 8%, x 14') $ 1.25
Additional copies of the same page; additional
pages of the same document or copies made $ .25
per subpoena (size exceeding 8%" x 14")
Postage Charge (if mailed)
Handling Charge (if mailed) $ .50
Subtotal
LABOR CHARGES (Per Evidence Code §1563)
Charge Per Total //
~,:, Description ~ Qrtr Hour Tim,~/ Cost
Time spent preparing and copying document ~ ~
Employee~ 4.00/ Hrs.
Time spent preparing and copying document ~ /
Employee$,/~ Hrs.
Time spent preparing and copying document ~ ~
Employee/$ 4.0~ Hrs.
-I
/ I$
TOTAL CHARGES
Subtotal of photocopy charges :
Subtotal of labor charges
'1 TOTAL CHARGES
Case File Name: ..~ t
Copies Requested By: LA~I ,,~ha~e /l~t~e.¢ 4 ~.ooce
Date Request Completed: 0 t..[ /I r~ ,/'~ .q'
R'..E: C 'E' I P T '.~ ...... ·
I 04/1g/95 ' Invoice Nbr. I 142055
9:13 am KERN CO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
2700 'M' Street
Bakersf'feqd, CA 93301 TYpe of Order
CASH REGISTER DAMES & MOORE/LANA SHANE
~COP~ES CSR ~ 04/~9/95 0~/19/95 CK 1260' NT
L~ne Descrffptffon Qu~n~ff~y Prffce Unfit D'~sc To~a'l
5°75~ MISC -' PHOTOCOPIES I 22.95 E
ZZZO09
Or'der To~a'i ~°~.95
Amount Due 22.95
Payment Made By Check 22.g5
THANK YOU!
(Local, State, of, Federal)
· Category A_ct. zvz~y, k____:_~ion · · (lOths)
Date/ Code' co~e
-7 "''/
I
Data ~nte~"ed By: Dete:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
# ~../~_~ ~O~) .~ Site Specific Status Changes:
)loyee #
Signature '--~ O --
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of Federal).
~eegOry Act. ivity C 10ths)
uo~e Description
ENVIRONMEN,,.-._ HEALTH JERVlCE$' '_ ,PARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. /~ 2700 'M' Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR V! Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
:May 18, 1994
Advanced Environmental Coucepts, ThC.
4400 Ashe Road, Suite 206
Bakersfield, CA 93313
SUBJECT: Haddad Dodge Class V Underground Injection Well
Remedial Action Workplan Revision
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The remedial action workplan revision prepared for the Haddad Dodge site located at
4601 California Avenue, Bakersfield, has been reviewed. It is our understanding that a
change has been initiated for cleanup action from vapor extraction procedures to flight
auguring with the addition of two (2) test hole borings to determine the lateral extent of the
contamination.
This Department has no objections to the proposed change in the site cleanup workplan.
Please notify this office forty-eight (48) hours prior to commencing work in order for a
hazardous materials specialist to be present.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
Hazardous. Materials Specialist III
Hazardous Materials Program
cc: C. Haddad
Haddad Dodge
P. O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93384
=ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC=
May '12. '1004
Ms. Flora Darling
Kern County
Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 9330'1
Regarding: Revised Dry Well Excavation Remediation Plan
Haddad Dodge
400'1 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Darling:
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. [AEC] has prepared a revised Dry Well Excavation
Remediation Workplan for the above referenced project/location. The attorneys concerned with
this project want to go for a "clean closure".
Enclosed please find that report, which AEC is submitting for review.
Should you have any questions or require clarification on any aspects of the enclosed, please do
not hesitate to contact our office at [805] 83'1-'1646.
Respectfully yours,
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
}
Project ~oordinator / Office Administrator
Attachments: Report ['1]
Distribution: '1/Addressee - REG MAIL
2/Mr. Chuck Haddad
4/Bksfld File
LETR~C
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
· I=t,',~l=l=l~[~ll:::l ~ C~A Q~.'~I~ R~R/RRI-IRaR FAX Rt3fi/R~1.1771
ENVIRONMEN,, . HEALTH SERVICE eI '_ .'PARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~!) Bakersfield, CA 93301
: (805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
March 24, 1994
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
4400 Ashe Road, #206
Bakersfield, CA 93313
SUBJECT: Haddad Dodge Class IV Underground Injection Well
Remedial Action Workplan
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The vapor extraction workplan proposal for remediation of the Haddad Dodge site located
at 4601 California Avenue, Bakersfield, CA, has been reviewed. The plan is acceptable to
this office pending the issue of a permit to construct by the Air Pollution Control District
(APCD).
Please provide a copy of the application to the APCD to this office for our information, and
schedule all work to be performed at the site forty-eight (48) hours in advance.
You may contact me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 8732, if you have 'any questions.
Sincerely,
By: Flora Darling, R.E.H.S., R.E(.A.
Hazardous Materials Specialist III
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:ch
cc: C. Haddad
Haddad Dodge
P.O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93384
daxling~haddad
ENVlRONME, ). .,L HEALTH SERVIC ., )EPARTMENT
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
I (805) 861-3636
/ (805) 861-3429 FAX
January 14, 1994
C. Haddad
Haddad Dodge
P. O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93384
SUBJECT: Underground Injection Well located at:
4001 California Ave, Bakersfield, CA
File No: EMO 50576
Dear Mr. Haddad:
The report of soil investigation prepared by Advanced Environmental Concepts (AEC),
dated November 1993, for the above-noted facility has been reviewed. The laboratory
analyses performed on soils sampled during the investigation reveal elevated levels of Total
Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as
diesel and gasoline with attendant components of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and
Xylene (BTEX). In addition to the above contaminants, Semi Volatile Organics and heavy
metals are also present. The level of contamination lies at a depth between forty and fifty-
five feet below surface grade. Based upon the results of the soil investigation, remedial
activities are required.
AEC has recommended soil vapor extraction for removal of the contamination. This office
agrees that vapor extraction is the preferred technique, since excavation of the contamina-
tion is precluded due to possible damage to the structure adjacent to the on-site dry well.
Thirty days are granted by this Department in order for you to contact your Environmental
Consultant with instructions to prepare a remedial action workplan addressing site cleanup.
The workplan must be submitted to this office for review before any work is started.
If you have any questions, you may contact me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 549.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Direct,9~
By~ng, ~.E.H.S., R.E.A./'~
Hazardous Materials SpecialCt4II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:jrw
(hm~larlingkhaddad.ltr)
· ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~~/~~'~,~~;~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
3uly 9, 1993
C. Haddad
HADDAD DODGE
P. O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93384
SUBJECT: Location : 4001 California Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
Known As : Haddad Dodge
Permit # : EMO50576
Dear Mr. Haddad:
Our Department has reviewed the site characterization workplan submitted by Advanced
Environmental Concepts, Inc. The workplan addressing soil sampling constituents to be
analyZed is acceptable, and health and safety considerations are also acceptable, for
investigation of extent of contamination present at this Class V Injection Well Site.
Please notify this office 48 hours prior to retrieving soil samples. Within thirty (30) days after
sampling and laboratory analyses are completed, a comprehensive report describing extent of
the site contamination must be submitted to this .office for review. The report must describe
remedial alternatives available and professional recommendations for the most feasible one.
If you have any questions, you may contact me at (805) 861-3636.
SincerelY,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Flor~H.S., R.E.A.
Hazardous Materials Specialist III
Hazardous Materials Management Program
FD:jg
cc: ~Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
mADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INCm
Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc. is pleased to present tho following:
Dry Well Excavation Remediation
Workplan
for
Haddad Dodge
4001 California Avenue
County of Kern · Bakersfield. California
This report has been prepared for:
Mr. Chuck Haddad Prepared: April t994
· · ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MINE) ·
~&EI:::~CPlI~I r'l t'~& Q~lCtlq[ RnRiR~I.IR~iR I:A~
Excavation Remediaflon Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Table of Contenls
Paae
1.0 INTRODUCTION I
2.0 BACKGROUND '1
2. t Dry Well History & Construction 1
2.2 Previous Environmental Audit 1
2;3 Soil Boring Assessment 2
3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 4
3. I Site Description 4
3.2 Regional Geology 5
3.3 Local Geology 5
3.4 Hydrogeology 5
4.0 WORK PLAN 5
4.t Extent of Hydrocarbon Migration 5
4.2 Exploratory Boring Methods 6
4.3 Exploratory Boring Sampling Methods 6
4.4 Excavation Boring Methods 7
4.5 Excavation Boring Backfill and Compaction 7
5.0 CLOSING 8
Appendix:
A] Project Maps/Figures
BI Site-specific Health & Safety Plan
Projecl: AEC 93V-t289
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN tN MIND ·
Excavation Remedlation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Mr. Chuck Haddad, of Haddad Dodge, has authorized Advanced Environmental
Concepts, Inc. (AEC) to prepare this workplan to describe methods and procedures to be
il~r~l~.m~.nted in th~ and remediation of hydrocarbon impacted soi_[J_l_l_l_l_l_l_/~diac_e_nt
.]to a cl ~e-'~'lo~:~te ...... ' d:
California (Appendix A, Figure 1). The agency contact for this project is Ms. Flora Darling,
Hazardous Materials Specialist with the Kern County Environmental Health Department
(County). Specific locations of the proposed excavation borings are shown on the
appended site map (Appendix A, Figure 2).
2.0 BACKGROUND
2. I Dry Well History & Construction ~"/
~el~J~qp.~r~!l~,ucted~g.f~f~o_o.~i~(~[,r~..~e.t,~r~ corrugated steel conduit filled with I to t .5
'inch gravel and functioned as a storm drain for the driveway area. It has been reported
that significant volumes of waste oil were discharged into the dry well. According to Mr.
Haddad and the service manager of the former facility, a total volume of approximately
five gallons was discharged into the drain during one accidental incident. Service Station
Maintenance of Kern County, Inc. was immediately retained to excavate the sump and
replace the "oily rocks" with seven scoops of one inch diameter gravel.
2.2 Previous Environmental Audit
Krazan & Associates conducted a Limited Environmental Audit of the subject property for
Coleman Ventures during December, 1992 which included the advancement of five
borings and analysis of soil samples. The Krazan & Associates, Inc. Limited Environmental
Audit reported several cases of insufficient record keeping, and non-compliant labelling
and storage of hazardous materials at the facility, as welt as lack of a routine
maintenance program for the two an-site sediment/grease traps. Materials noted at the
site included motor oil, antifreeze, paints, gasoline, diesel, and parts-washing solvents.
Gases observed on site included Freon, oxygen and acetylene. Waste liquids included
waste oil, antifreeze, paints and parts-washing solvents. Soil samples collected from two
borings adjacent to the on-site dry well had concentrations of TRPH [270 rog/kg at I0 feet
bgs], Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (I'PPH] as gasoline [730 rog/kg at 10 feet
bgs reported as a "non-gas > C8"), Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH) as
diesel [2,100 mglkg reported as "non-diesel mix C9-C12"], benzene [0.019 mg/kg at 30
feet bgs], and elevated metals concentrations. Based on the analytical results, KCEHSD
requested that a site assessment be performed to evaluate the extent of hydrocarbon-
impacted soil.
ProJecl: AEC 93V-t289 t
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH OESIGN IN MINE) ·
'Excavation Remediation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc.
2.3 Soil Boring Assessment
On Octaber 5, '1993, one soil boring was advanced to a depth of 55 feet on the subject
property and positioned to evaluate the vertical extent of the contamination that resulted
from the operation of the dry well system. [Appendix A, Figure 2]. The boring location was
approved by Ms. Flora Darling of KCEHSD.
Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals, commencing at '10 feet BGL. Selected soil
samples were submifled to Associated Laboratories, a California-certified laboratory,
located in Orange, California and analyzed for CAM-'17 metals, Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH], purgeable organics, semi volatile organics, Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline ['rPH-g], and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel
[TPH-D] utilizing EPA 6040, 7424, 448.'1, 8240, 8270, and CA DHS methodologies,
respectively.
The analytical results of samples collected on October 6, 4993 are presented in Tables t
through 4.
TABLE t
Soil Sample Results - Hydrocarbons
't0/06/93
(pprn]
Sample I.D. TRPH TPH-d TPH-g
B-3-'10' 6'1 ND ND
B-3- ~ 5' 26 ND ND
B-3-25' 25 ND ND
B-3-35' 48 ND ND
B-3-40' 48 ND ND
B-3-50' '14 ND
B-3-55' ND ND ND
DW-'1 6~2,500 8 6~O--~~Z_O~..,
Detection Limit lO Ia 5
ND: Non-Detected at indicated level at detection.
TRPH: Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH-d: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel
TPH-g: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
ppm: Parts per million
Project: AEC 93V-4289 2
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND *
I::IAKICR~I=II::I i"3 C:,A ClRRIR R{3.~IR.'31-1~46 · FAX RI3R/R.~I1*1771
Excovc~lion Remedtafion Workplon Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc.
'TABLE 2
Soil Sample Results - Purgeable Organics
10/06/93
Ethyl- Total 2- Tetrachloro-
Sample I.D. Acetone benzene Xylenes Butanone ethane
B-3-t0' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-15' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-25' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-35' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-40' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-45'~_.. ...~..D. 71.7~ 3..Z.~zS__...,~.. ND ND
B-3-50' "--"' ND ND ND i ND ND
B-3-55' ND ND ND ND ND
DW-I 748 ND ND . 1_~32~ 1~3_
Detection Limit t0 t0 10 10 40
ppm: Pads Per Billion
ND: Non Detected
TABLE 3
Soil Sample Results - Semi Volatile Organics
t0/06/93
(ppb}
Sample I.D. .~ BBP N MN BEP BP BF BA
B-3-t0' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-15' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-25' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-35' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-40'~,,~ - 1,033' 192 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-45' t,~' ~ 125 755
B-3-50' ND N ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-55' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
DW-t ND ND ND ND t450 497 574 835
Detection Limit 40 40 40 10 40 t0 10 10
ND: Non Detected
DBP: Di-n-butylphthalate
BBP: Butylbenzylphthalate
N: Naphthalene
MN: 2-Methylnaphthalene
BEP: bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
BP: Benzo(a)pyrene
BF: Benzo(b)fluoranthrene
BA: Benzo(a)anthracene
Project: AEC 93V-t289 3
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
R~R IR~I-IR4R ~ FAX
Excavation Rernedlation WorkPlan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 4
Soil Sample Results - CAM '17 Metals
'!0/06/93
[ppm]
B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3
Sample I.D. t0' 15' 25' 35' 40' 45' 50' 55' DW-I
Antimony ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND '
Arsenic 9.70 1.t5 1.48 13.1 3.84 2.92 2.03 2.53 5.83
Barium 44.7 19.3 22.3 t 24 42.6 50.8 77.6 54.0 290
Beryllium 0.35 0. t8 0.14 1.07 0.35 35.4 0.30 0.55 0.65
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.42
Chromium,Hex ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chromium,Total 5.28. 3.58 2.71 17.1 4.68 4.22 3.04 3.20 31.5
Cobalt 4.117 2.12 t.99 9.14 2.52 2.92 5.28 3.29 7.02
Copper 3.62 1.91 1.88 11.6 3.09 3.79 4.68 t3.7 91.3
Fluoride 2.25 2.60 0.64 3.56 0.69 0.68 0.71 1.33 3.25
Lead t.40, 1.63 0.76 4.78 1.30 1.80 3.25 2.53 285
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.07
Molybdenum ND 'ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.45
Nickel 4.18 3.tl 4.t3 10.2 2.24 1.71 4.46 1.66 25.5
Selenium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.7
'Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Thallium 1.59 t .02 1.10 3.67 0.85 t.80 3.25 t .43 2.40
Vanadium 17.8 t0.2 8.93 47.6 26.0 16.t 12.6 16.0 31.1
Zinc 18.7 16.0 1t.8 43.8 11.3 14.4 14.5 22.t 46t
Detection Limit t0 '10 t0 t0 t0 10 10 10 10
ND'. Non-Detected at indicated level at detection.
3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The following sections summarize the project site features and conditions along with regional and
local geological and hydrological characteristics.
3. t Site Description
The Haddad Dodge facility is located on the south side of California Avenue. The general
area is comprised of auto dealerships, strip centers, and restaurants. The facility is at an
average elevation of 400-feet above mean sea level with minimal topographic relief.
Project: AEC 93V-t289 4
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
~AI<'I=~II=I ~ ~A ~RI~ fl(')fi/R31-1fi4fi · FAX f10.~/f131-1771
Excavation Remedlation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
3.2 .Regional Geology
The subject property is located in the Southern San Joaquin Valley [Valley} which is a part
of the Central Valley of California. The Valley forms the sauthern two-thirds of the Central
Valley and is characterized as a broad structural trough. It is bordered on the east by the
Sierra Nevada Range and on the west by the Coast Range [Diablo and Temblor
Mountains]. The Valley extends 250-miles southeastward from the confluence of the San
Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers to the Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains; The width
ranges from 25-miles wide near the Kern River to approximately 55-miles wide near the
Kings River, ~vith an approximate average width of 40-miles.
Geology of the southern Valley consists of a Pre-Tertiary basement complex overlain by
marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age. These rocks are composed of
consolidated sandstones, siltstones and shales which thicken from northeast to southwest.
The Valley was once an inland sea of comparatively shallow depth that continued to
subside due to the ever increasing load of sediments transported and deposited from
higher elevations. These deposits consist of gravels, sands, silts and clays. The majarity
of the groundwater pumped from the Valley floor occurs within these relatively
unconsolidated continental deposits.
3.3 Local Geology
The investigated property is located on alluvial deposits, created from sediments
transported and depasited by local streams, and during flood stages of the Kern River.
The site is situated in a Iow to moderate energy flood plain environment consisting of
weakly consolidated to'unconsolidated~ poorly bedded sands and silts.
'3.4 Hydrogeology
Ground and surface water in the north Bakersfield area is regulated by the Ke~n County
Water Agency Improvement District. According to the Kern County Water Agency "Water
Supply Report-1990":~ depth to groundwater in unconfined 'and equivalent wells is
estimated at 25-feet~below grade level [BGL] at the site. No perched water-bearing
zones are identified. Groundwater quality is unknown at this time.
4.0 WORK PLAN
4.1 Extent of Hydrocarbon Migration
Based on the results of analyses of soil samples collected during the October, 1993
assessment boring [B-3] adjacent to the dry well, the vertical extent of petroleum
hydrocarbon migration is limited to a depth of approximately 50 feet BGL. Based
ProJecl: AEC 93V-'1289 5
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
~-~l=~q;~tl=l r'l C~A C1~1~ R(3RIRRI-IG4~ I=AX Rr)RIRRl-1771
Excavation' Remedlation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
on the type of construction and use of the dry 'well, the lateral extent of
contamination is expected to be limited to the area immediately surrounding the
well. Two additional exploratory borings in the vicinity of the dry well are proposed
to confirm the lateral extent of contamination. It is planned ta excavate an
estimated total of approximately,20.0_tons of II~pacted soil from this area of the
4.2 Exploratory Boring Methods
Two exploratory borings will be advanced using a Mobile B-57 Drill Rig, with-a 6-
-inch diameter, continuous flight auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 4452-80
for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. The augers will be steam
cleaned prior to drilling and belween borings in order to minimize the possibility
of downhole or crosshole contamination. The lithology and other pertinent data
will be recorded on a field boring log in accordance with ASTM Method D 2488-84
for visual description and identification of soils.
4.3 Exploratory Boring Sampling Methods
The exploratory borings will be advanced to a total depth of fifty feet each in the
vicinity of the dry well. Soil samples will be collected at five foot Inte~als from
each of these two exploratory borings using a California modified, split spoon
sampling device containing clean brass sleeves. The sampling device will be
driven into undisturbed soil by repeatedly dropping a '140-pound hammer a
distance of approximately 30 vertical inches, in accordance with ASTM Methods
D 4586-84 for split-barrel sampling of soil and D 4587-83 for thin-walled tube
sampling of soils. The number of blows required to drive the sampler each
successive six {6] inch distance will be recorded on the field logs during drilling
and sampling procedures. The brass sleeves and split-spoon sampler will be
decontaminated in a phosphate-free detergent solution and double rinsed in
clean de-ionized water prior ta each use.
Soil samples will be quickly sealed with teflon tape and plastic end caps, sealed
with tape, labeled, and placed in individual plastic bags In accordance with EPA
protocols. The samples will be recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document, placed
in a cooler with frozen blue. ice, and transported to a California Certified
Laboratory under Chain-of-Custody protocol.
Selected samples will be analyzed for the presence of Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons [TRPH], Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and gasoline and
diesel, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Purgeable Halocarbons accordance
with EPA methods 418.~, 8045 modified, 8020, and 80t0, respectively.
Project: AEC 93V-1289 6
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Excavation Remediaflon Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc.
4.4 ExcavatiOn Boring Methods
A truck mounted drill rig equipped .with - ~' will be used to
excavate the impacted soil to a maximum depth of approximately 50 feet BGL.
Due to the total depth of Impacted soil, the close proximity of the dry well to a site
structure and adjacent property, traditional excavation methods using a backhoe
or excavator is judged to be impractical at the Haddad facility. AEC estimates
that impacted soil surrounding the dry well can be adequately removed by drilling
a total~Q~_~~Z~[g~, four feet in diameter each, closely spaced around the dry
well.
All soil removed from the dry well area will be monitored for hydrocarbans and
volatile organic compounds [VOC's] during the excavation/boring operations to
ensure proper segregation of impacted soil from clean soil. Soil monitoring will be
conducted at the excavation using a TIP~v~II Photoionization Detector [PID],
manufactured by Photovac, Inc. Actual excavation/boring depths will be
determined in the field based on continuous PID monitoring and consultation with
the KCEHSD representative.
4.5 Excavation Boring BaCldill and Compaction
Upon completion of each four-foot diameter boring, the excavation will be
backfilled with cement slurry and self-compacting rock to a depth of
approximately ten feet BGL.~ The clean stockpiled soil will be returned to the
· excavations from approximately ten feet BGL to surface grade and mechanically
compacted to a minumum of 85% compaction.
Project: AEC 93V-t289 7
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MINO ·
Excavation Remediafion Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
5.0 CLOSING
This work plan represents AEC's professional opinions based On currently available data and
arrived at in accordance with accepted hydrogeologic and environmental engineering
practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given.
This work plan has been prepared by:
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Jon~t an L. Buck .
Pro~e~C~eologist
This work plan has been technically reviewed by:
///J~seJ~ A. Dunwaody III ~
//Cali~ornia Registered Geologist ~5504
DOC16DS
Project: AEC93V-t289 8
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND
- "Appendix'A'
PROJECT MAPS'/FIGURES
eKRAZAN SOIL BORINGS
AEC -SITE MAP- FIGURE-
Haddad Dodge, .'
· - 4001 Calif0mlaAvenue. , . "'
· ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL'CONCEPT~'
,°.o. ~oxaob'~ a,,U(S~RF_/.~ C.4 ~ County of Kem· Bakersfield, Califomia '.., · '"
PARKIN{3
AUTO REPAIR BUILDINGI
PARKIN~
AUTO REPAIR BUILDING
LARGE DIAMETER AUGER LOCATION
/'[.El ~11 Proposed Auger Location FIGURE
"Appendix ,B"
HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
Excavation Remediation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Health & Safety Plan
for
Haddad Dodge
400t California Avenue
County of Kern · Bakersfield, California 93309
Introduction:
A Site Safely Plan [SSP] has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil
assessment/remediation. It's purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site
personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that
may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal
protective equipment standards, decontamination procedures and emergency action plans.
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. seeks to enter the property described above for the
purpose of conducting a site remediation and assessment, consisting of soil excavation using a
drill rig equipped with four-foot diameter auger, exploratory soil borings using a Mobile B-57 drill
rig, and sampling to remove petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil.
Soil samples will be collected during exploratory boring. All possible efforts will be made to
collect undisturbed samples. All samples to be chemically analyzed will be collected in brass
sampling sleeves, capped with teflon and plastic end caps, sealed with tape, and placed on ice
in a cooler immediately. All Chain-of-Custody protocol will be followed.
Excavation equipment will be brought to the site and operated by:
Barney's Hole Digging Service, Incorporated
P.O. Box 8596
Long Beach, California 90808
(310) 595-5224
This SSP describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from deleterious contamination of
personal injury while conducting on-site activities. As described below, we will strive to meet all
requirements promulgated by the California Department of Health Services.
Responsibilities of Key Personnel:
All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr. Jonathan Buck will serve as Project
Manager and on-site Engineer. He will also serve as Site Safely Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Buck
will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel will be required to
document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the
SSP will be monitored at all times by the SSO. Appropriate personal protective equipment, listed
ProJecl: AEC 93V-'1289 ~1
ExCaVation Remediation Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
below, will be available and utilized by all on-site personnel. Prior to beginning work, the SSO will
canduct a training session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training
session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site and will utilize Material Safety Data
Sheets for infarmatian on compaunds to be encountered.
Mr. Buck will alsa be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting and securing samples, and
assuring sample Integrity by adherence to Chain-of-Custody protocol.
All on-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After
documenting their understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict
adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO
and corrected. On-site employees are held respansible to perform only those tasks for which they
believe they are qualified. Provisions of this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with
on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto.
Job Hazard Analyses:
Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating
any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple
precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment.
Barney's Hole Digging Service, Inc. will deliver and operate all excavating equipment. Qualified
personnel only will have any contact with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the
excavation contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity
to excavating equipment. Latex sampling gloves will be worn by persons collecting or handling
samples to prevent exposure to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples and
used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contamination. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn
if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using a Photoionization
Detector [PID]. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5-ppm, in the breathing
space. Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame or sparks will be permitted in order to
prevent accidental ignition.
Risk Assessment Summary:
Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, and benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylene [BTEX]. These chemicals represent a hazard because they are
moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly flammable.
Threshold Limit Values [TLV's], Shod Term Exposure Limits [STEL's] and Toxicity levels [LDb0, oral-rat],
all in rog/kg [ppm], are listed below:
Project: AEC 93V-~289 2
Excavation Remedlaflon Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Compound TLV STEL Toxicity
Gasoline 200 300 ....
Diesel 50 75 ....
Benzene 10 25 4894
· Toluene 100 150 5000
Xylene '100 '150 4300
Benzene is considered an extreme cancer' hazard. Applicable MSDS forms are attached.
Exposure Monitorin.q Plan:
Air monitoring will be conducted during excavation procedures using a TIPT~II Photoionization
Detector [PID] equipped with a '10.6eV lamp, manufactured by Photovac, Inc. The PID will be
calibrated to 50 ppm hexane. Volatile emissions are not anticipated but will nevedheless be
monitored.
Personal Protective EquiPment:
When handling samples, the on-site Geologist will wear latex gloves. Hard hats will be worn by
all personnel on-site When in proximity of excavation equipment.
Work Zones and Securily Measures:
Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placards or wide
yellow tape, surrounding the site, will define the perimeter, if needed. The Project Manager will
be responsible for site security.
Decontamination Measures:
Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense
dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning or placing equipment on possible
contaminated soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck and face with soap
and water before taking a break or leaving the site.
Excavation, boring, and sampling equipment used will be decontaminated by steam-cleaning.
Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample collection.
Project: AEC 93V-~289 3
Excavation Remediaflon Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
General Safe Work Practices:
On-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and
equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed.
Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including
respirator fit.
Excavation, boring, and sampling equipment ~vill be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site.
The on-site Geologist will oversee operations and log the excavation strata. The Sample
Coordinator will assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling
samples.
Training! Requirements:
The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms,
contaminant properties, warning signs, health hazard data, risk from exposure and emergency
first aid.
All chemicals are to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site
hazards.
Medical Surveillance Proaram:
According to CFR 29, '19'10.'120, Paragraph If], employees who wear respirators thirty [30] days
or more during one !'1] year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health
hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically.
All site personnel will be required to have had a complete chemical physical within the past year.
Record Keepin~l:
Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site
according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received
training on the SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms and all emergency procedures. These will
be reviewed during the pre-site training meeting.
Exposure records on each job will be kept for thirty (30) years to meet requirements. Included will
be names and social securitynumbers af employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from
entry to exit, first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons and personal air monitoring
records.
Project: AEC 93V-q289 4
Excavcrlion Remedialion Workplan Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Continglency Plans:'
In the event of an accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior Project
Manager, or other person, will notifY the appropriate government agencies or individuals as
follows:
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
[805] 861-3636
Police,. Fire or Ambulance Emergency
9-1-t
Nearest Emer.qenay Hospital
Meray Hospital
2215 Truxtun Avenue '
Bakersfield, California 90022
Emergenay Serviaes Telephone:
[805] 632-5275
ProJecl: AEC 93V-t289 5
· Excavation Remediafion Workplan Advanced Environmental C~.ncepts, Inc.
I have read the Health and Safety Plan and understand the contents herein:
NAME: COMPANY
Project: AEC 93V-'~289 6
=ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC=
August '19, '1994
Ms. Flora Darling
Kern County
Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 9330'1
Regarding: Dry Well Excavation Repod
The Former Haddad Dodge Facility
400'1 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Darling:
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. [AEC] has prepared the Dry Well Excavation Report for
the above referenced project/location.
Enclosed please find that report, which AEC is submitting for review.
Should you have any questions or require clarification on any aspects of the enclosed, please do
not hesitate to contact our office at [805] 83'1-'1646.
Respectfully yours,
Advanced Environmental Concepts. Inc.
~Deb'E)~e I-rwin ~
~oj~ct Coordinator / Office Administrator
Attachments: Report
Distribution: '1/Addressee - REG MAIL
2/Mr. Chuck Haddad
'1/Bksfld File
LETI~4AC
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 · BAKERSFIELD. CACJ3313 805/831-1846 · FAX 805/831-1771
· ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INCo
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. is pleased to present the following:
.Dry Well Excavation
Report
for
The Former Haddad Dodge Facilily
400t California Avenue
county of Kern · Bakersfield, Caiifomia
This report has bccn prepared for:
Mr. Chuck Haddad, Prepared: August t994
Haddad Dodge, Inc.
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
4400 ASHE ROAD. #206 * BAKERSFIELD. CA93313 805/831-1846 * FAX 805/831-1771
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental concepts, Inc.
Table of Conlenls
Subiect Paae
1.0 INTRODUCTION I
1 .t Purpose I
2.0 BACKGROUND t
2.1 Preliminary Site Assessment
2;2 Site Assessment 2
3.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 6
3. I Site Description 6
3.2 Regianal Geology 6
3.3 Local Gealogy 7
3.4 Hydrogeology 7
3.5 Soil Profile 7
4.0 DRY WELL AND SOIL 7
EXCAVATION PROCEDURES
4.1 Dry Well Removal 7
4.2 Soil Removal 8
4.3 Soil Sample Collection 8
4.4 Surface Excavation 9
5.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 9
6.0 CONCLUSIONS 12
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 13
8.0 LIMITATIONS t 3
9.0 CLOSING 14
Appendices:
(A) Project Maps/Figures
(B) Boring Logs
ICI Laboratory Reports/Chain-of-Custody Documents
ID] Non-Hazardous Waste Manifest[s]
Project: AEC 94C-t450
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a dry well excavation project performed at the former Haddad
Dodge facility, 4001 California Avenue, Bakersfield, California (Figure t). All environmental
services conducted on-site were in accordance with the workplan prepared by AEC and
approved by Ms. Flora Darling, Hazardous Materials Specialist, Kern County Environmental Health
'Department (KCEHD).
Contained in this report is background information regarding existing site characteristics, regional
and local hydrogeological profiles, and the project history. Also included in the following sections
ore the objectives and scope of investigation, detailed investigative procedures, and subsequent
findings. Finally, AEC provides an evaluation of said findings and makes recommendations for
the site. The repod appendices contain project maps and figures (Appendix A), boring logs
[Appendix B], laboratory reports/chain-of-custody documents [Appendix C] and, non-hazardous
waste manifests [Appendix DJ.
t .1 Purpose
The purpose of the project was twofold: t. Remove the drywell, concrete form, and drain
rock; and 2. Excavate and dispose of hydrocarbon impacted soil surrounding and
beneath the dry~ell.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2. t Preliminary Site Assessment
Prior to this investigation, Twining Laboratories, Inc. and Krazan & Associates, Inc. had
perfarmed assessment and/or investigations at the subject site; The following report was
· reviewed:
Krazan & Associates, Inc., Limited Environmental Audit, Haddad Dodge, 4001
California Avenue, Bakersfield, California, October 23, 1992, prepared for
Coleman Properties.
A brief summary of the report reviewed is presented below. The summary does not reflect
any interpretation or critical evaluation by AEC.
Krazan & Associates conducted a Limited Environmental Audit of the subject property for
Coleman Ventures' during December, 1992 which included the advancement of five
borings and analysis of soil samples. The Krazan & Associates, Inc. Limited Environmental
Audit reported several cases of insufficient record keeping, and non-compliant labelling
and storage of hazardous materials at the facility, as well as lack of a routine
maintenance program for the two on-site sediment/grease traps. Materials noted at the
site included motor oil, antifreeze, paints, gasoline, diesel, and parts-washing solvents.
Gases observed on site included Freon, oxygen and acetylene. Waste liquids included
waste oil,.antifreeze, paints and parts-washing Solvents. Soil samples collected from two
borings adjacent to the on-site dry well had detected concentrations of TRPH [270 mg/kg
at 10 feet bgs), Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons ('rPPH] as gasoline [730 mg/kg
at 10 feet bgs reported as a "non-gas > C8"), Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Project: AEC 94C-1450 I
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
(TEPH) as diesel (2,100 mg/kg reported as "non-diesel mix C9-C12"), benzene (0.019 mg/kg
at 30 feet bgs), and elevated metals concentrations. Based on the analytical results the
County requested that a site assessment be performed to evaluate the extent of
hydrocarbon-impacted soil.
Subsequent to the request by KCEHD a workplan, dated June 1993, was submitted to and
approved by Ms. Flora Darling of the KCEHD. In accordance with the workplan one soil
boring, B-I, was advanced to a total depth of 55 feet BGL and selected soil samples were
submitted to the laboratory for analysis.
2.2 Site Assessment
On October 5, t993 assessment activities were conducted at the subject site. The project
included advancing one soil boring to a total depth of 55 feet BGL and submitting
selected soil samples to the laboratory for analysis for CAM-17 metals, Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons ['rRPH], purgeable organics, semi volatile organics, Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g], and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel
{TPH-d] utilizing EPA 6010, 7421, 418.1, 8240, 8270, and CA DHS methodologies,
respectively. For further detail please refer to Haddad Dodge site assessment repart,
1993.
The analytical results are presented in Table I - 4. Units are in milligrams per kilogram
[mg/kg] which are equivalent to parts per million [ppm].
TABLE 1
Soil Sample Results - Hydrocarbons
10/06/93
Sample I.D. TRPH TPH-d TPH-g
B-3-10' 61 ND ND
B-3-15' 26 ND ND
B-3-25' 25 ND ND
B-3-35' 18 / ND ND
B-3-40' 48 J ND ND
B-3-45' 7,790 t,165 U' 10,660
/
B-3-50' 14 ND ND /
B-3-55' ' ND ND ND
DW-I 62,500 / 8,640 ~/ 2,370
Detection Limit I0 I 0 5
ND: Non-Detected at indicated level at detection.
TRPH: Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH-d: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel
TPH-g: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
ppm: Parts per million
Project: AEC 94C-t450 2
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 2
Soil Sample Results - Purgeable Organics
I0/06~3
[ppb}
Sample I.D. A EB X 2B TCE
B-3-I0' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-15' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-25' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-35' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-40' ND ND v'"' ND ND ND
B-3-45' ND 717 3765 ,--/' ND ND
B-3-50' ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-55' ND ND ND ND ND
DW-I 738 ND ND 132 t3
Detection Limit t0 t0 t0 t0 t0
ppm: Parts Per Billion
ND: Non Detected
A: Acetone
EB: Ethylbenzene
X: Xylenes
2B: 2-Butanane
TABLE 3
Soil Sample Results - Semi Volatile Organics
10/06/93
[ppb}
Sample I.D. DBP BBP N MN BEP BP BF BA
B-3-I0' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-'15' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-25' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-35' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-40' '1,033 '192 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-45' 7'10 ND 125 755 577 ND ND ND
B-3-50' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-55' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
DW-I ND ND ND ND 1450 497 574 835
Detection Limit 10 10 10 10 40 10 40 40
ND: Non Detected
BA: Benzo[a]anthraaene
BF: Benzo[b]fluoranthrene
BP: Benzo[a]pyrene
DBP: Di-n-butylphthalate
BBP: Butylbenzylphthalate
N: Naphthalene
MN: 2-Methylnaphthalene
BEP: bis[2-Ethylhnxyl]phthalate ..
Project: AEC 94C-t4,50 3
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 4
Soil Sample Results - CAM 47 Metals
40/06/93
B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-3
Sample I.D. 10' 15' 25' 35' 40' 45' 50' 55' DW-I
Antimony ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Arsenic 9.70 1.15 1.48 13.1 3.84 2.92 2.03 2.53 5.83
Barium 44.7 19.3 22.3 124 42.6 50.8 77.6 54.0 290
Beryllium 0.35 0.18 0.14 t .07 0.35 35.4 0.30 0.55 0.65
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.42
Chromium,Hex ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chromium,Total 5.28 3.58 2.71 17.1 4.68 4.22 3.04 3.20 31.5
Cobalt 4.11 2.12 1.99 9.14 2.52 2.92 5.28 3.29 7.02
Copper 3.62 1.9t t .88 11.6 3.09 3.79 4.68 13.7 91.3
Fluoride 2.25 2.60 0.64 3.56 0.69 0.68 0.71 1.33 3.25
Lead 1.40 1.63 0.76 4.78 t .30 1.80 3.25 2.53 285
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.07
Molybdenum ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.45
Nickel 4.t8 3.11 4.13 10.2 2.24 1.71 4.46 1.66 25.5
Selenium ND. ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.7
Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Thallium 1.59 t .02 1.10 3.67 0.85 1.80 3.25 t .43 2.40
Vanadium 17.8 10.2 8.93 47.6 26.0 16.1 12.6 16.0 31 .I
Zinc 18.7 16,0 t 1.8 43.8 11.3 14.4 t4,5 22.t 461
Detection Limit 10 10 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0
ND: Non-Detected at indicated level at detection.
Base on analytical results KCEHD required that remedial action be performed.
On May 25, 1994 two additional soil borings were advanced at the subject site. Soil borings B-4
and B-5 were drilled to a depth of 50 feet BGL and positioned to further evaluate the areal
migration of the contaminants. Selected soil samples were collected and submitted to B.C.
Laboratories for analysis of TPH as waste oil, gasoline and diesel, and halogenated volatile
organics using DHS and EPA methodologies. Analytical results indicated concentrations below
detectable limits for all constituents analyzed. Results are presented in Tables ,5 and 6, labaratory
'data sheets and Chain-of-Custody are in Appendix C.
Project: AEC 94C-1450 4
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 5
Soil Sample Results
t0 Feet West of Dry Well
0§125/94
TPH
Sample I.D, W/O TPH-g TPH-d Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene
B-4 @ 5' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
'B-4 @ 15' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-4 @ 25' ND., NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-4 @ 35' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-4 @ 40' NA ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-4 @ 45' NA ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-4 @ 50' NA ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-5 @ I0' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-5 @ 20' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-5 @ 30' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
B-5 @ 35' NA ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-5 @ 45' NA ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-5 @ 50' ND NA NA NA NA NA NA
Detection Limits:
TABLE 6
Soil Sample Results - 8010
10 Feet West of Dry Well
05125/94
B-4 B-4 B-4 B-5 B-5 B-5 Detection
Constituents @ 40' @ 45' @ 50' @ 35' @ 40' @ 45' Limits
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Chloroform ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ,ND ND ND ND 0.005
t,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
t,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
· 1, .1 -Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
.1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Project: AEC 94C-t450 5
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 6 - (continued]
Soil Sample Results - 80t0
10 Feet West of Dry Well
05125/94
[ppm]
B-4 B-4 B-4 B-5 B-5 B-5 Detection
Constituents @ 40' @ 45' @ 50' @ 35' @ 40' @ 45' Limits
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
t ,2-Dichloropropa ne ND ND ND ND ND. ND 0.005
cis-~,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
frans- ~,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005.
Methylene Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
4 ,'1,2,2-Tetrachloraethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
~, ~, ~ ,-Trich Ioroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
~ ,'1,2-Trich Ioroetha ne ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Trichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.005
3.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The following sections summarize the project site features and conditions along with regional and
local geological and hydrological characteristics.
3. t Site Description
The Haddad Dodge facility is located on the south side of California Avenue. The general
area is comprised of auto dealerships, shopping centers, and restaurants. The facility is
at an average elevation of 400-feet above mean sea level with minimal topographic
relief.
3.2 Regional Geology
The subject property is located in the Southern San Joaquin Valley [Valley] which is a part
of the Central Valley of California. The Valley forms the southern two-thirds of the Central
Valley and is characterized as a braad structural trough. It is bordered on the east by the
Sierra Nevada Range and on the west by the Coast Range (Diablo and Temblor
Mountains]. The Valley extends 250-miles southeastward from the confluence of the San
Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers to the Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains. The width
ranges from 25-miles wide near the Kern River to approximately 55-miles wide near the
Kings River, with an approximate average width of 40-miles.
Geology cf the southern Valley consists of a Pre-Tertiary basement complex overlain by
marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks of Tertiary age. These rocks are compased of
consolidated sandstanes, siltstones and shales which thicken from northeast to southwest.
Project: AEC 94C-1450 6
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
The Valley was once an inland sea of comparatively shallow depth that continued to
subside due to the ever increasing load of sediments transported and deposited from
higher elevations. These deposits consist of gravels, sands, silts and clays. The majority
of the groundwater pumped from the Valley floor occurs within these relatively
unconsolidated continental deposits.
3.3 Local Geology
The investigated property is located on alluvial deposits, created from sediments
transported and deposited by local streams, and during flood stages of the Kern River.
The site is situated in a Iow to moderate energy flood plain environment consisting of
weakly consolidated to unconsolidated, poorly bedded sands and silts.
3.4 Flydrogeology
Ground and surface water in the Bakersfield area is regulated by the Kern County Water
Agency Improvement District. According to the Kern County Water .Agency "Water Supply
Report-1990", depth to groundwater in unconfined and equivalent wells is estimated at
~,~t00-feet below grade level [BGL] at the site. No perched water-bearing zones are
identified during the drilling portion of AEC's assessment. Groundwater quality is unknown
at this time.
3.5 Soil Profile
From grade level to a depth of 35 feet BGL a yellow brown, poorly graded, sand/
silt (SP] is present. A zone of silty sand [SM) occurs from 35 to 40 feet, underlain by a
poorly graded sand (SP) zone from 40 to 46 feet, a cobble zone from 46 to 49 feet, and
poorly graded sand to 55 feet BGL.
4.0 DRY WEll and SOIL EXCAVATION PROCEDURES
Commencing on June '15, '19q4, and ending on June 28, '19q4 an AEC project geologist directed
the removal of the drywall and the associated hydrocarbon impacted soil at the former Haddad
Dodge Facility. F×cavation activities were conducted using a large diameter auger drill rig
operated by Crockett Drilling personnel. The AEC geologist determined the presence of
hydrocarbons in the soil using a Microtip MP -1000 photoionization detector and by visual and
olfactory inspection.
4. t Dry Well Removal
Removal of the dry well and associated appurtenances was accomplished by initially
removing the steel grate covering the dry well and then removing the drain rock
contained in the concrete form using a 4 foot diameter bucket-auger. The excavated
gravel was staged on plastic sheeting pending the removal of additional material and
subsequent disposal. Following the removal of the gravel the 4 by 4 by 8 foot concrete
form was removed and disposed of at the Granite Construction concrete recycling facility.
Proiect: AEC 94C-t450 7
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
4.2 Soil Removal
After the gravel and conduit were removed soil excavation procedures commenced. 'The
first boring was advanced using a 4-foot diameter auger and proceeded to a depth of
approximately 20 feet when excessive caving made further excavation impossible. A
second attempt was made using a 2 foot diameter auger, however, excessive caving
occurred end this boring was also terminated at 20' BGL. The occurrence of significant
caving in the two borings, indicated that conventional auguring to a depth of 52 feet BGL
is not possible. Therefore, it was decided to float steel casing behind the auger in an
attempt to hold back caving sands.
One' half inch thick steel casing with a 74 inch diameter, was cut into 5 foot increments
and floated behind the 4-foot auger. As each casing segment advanced downward the
next segment was welded to the previous until 35 feet of steel casing was in the ground.
At 35 feet BGL the soil firmed-up and the casing could not be advanced further. The soil
no longer caved into the auger h_ole and the boring was advan~,~ t~ ,-~pprp_ximately 53
feet BGL, tl:~en reamed tO ~1 dia~net~r of ~ feet. The large diameter auger - excavation'
ac~ities resulted in approximately 60 cubic yards of impacted soil removed from the dry
well area. Following the termination of the excavation activities the steel casing was filled
with a sand-cement slurry to about ~ 0 feet BGL, then the steel casing was pulled out of the
hole using a 50-ton crane leaving a 52 foot slurry column. Limits of the excavation/boring
are presented on Figure :2.
4.3 Soil Sample Collection
During the ·excavation program the soil was screened using a PID as well as visual and
olfactory observations. At a depth of 45 feet BGL field evidence suggested that "clean"
soil had been encountered and a soil sample was collected. Following the sample
collection an additional 8 feet [approximate] were removed by the auger and another
soil sami~le was collected. The samples were submitted to B. C. Laboratories of
Bakersfield, California and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as waste oil (TPH-w],
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes [BTEX], lead, beryllium, and semi-volatile
organics. Soil sample locations are presented in their relative positions on Figure 3.
Two confirmatory soil samples were collected from the auger boring at 45 and 52.7 feet.
The following sample collection protocol was observed:
I] The drill rig operator was instructed to retrieve a representative sample of
native soil from the sample points and bring the soil to surface grade for
collection;
2] A qualified AEC representative pushed a clean brass sleeve or glass jar,
into .an undisturbed portion of the soil, leaving no head space in the
container;
3} The container was capped with Teflon-lined lids, sealed with tape, labeled,
recorded on a chain-of-custody document to ensure sample Integrity and
traceability, and placed in a cooler chilled with Blue Ice;
Project: AEC 94C-1450
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well ExcaVation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
4) The samples were analyzed by B.C. Laboratories, a State-certified
laboratory in Bakersfield, California.
4.4 Surface Excavation
Following the augering activity and the emplacement of the slurry column the area
surrounding the former dry well was'excavated to an approximate depth of 10 feet by an
Extend ~ A - Hoe backhoe. The excavation activities were conducted to remove any
remnants of the dry well gravel or residual hydrocarbon impacted soil. The activity.~..._.__~
resulted in atl by 44 foot rectangular pit with depths varying from 8 to 12 feet.
Approximately 25 additional yards of soil were removed from the dry well area. At the
conclusion of the excavation activities seven soil samples, one from each sidewall and
three from the floor, were collected from the pit. The soil samples were submitted to
Associated Laboratories of Orange California and analyzed for total petroleum
hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d], total petroleum hydrocarbon as gasoline (TPH-g], and BTE×,
in accordance with EPA and DHS methodologies. Soil sample locations are plotted on
Figure 2.
The following sampling protocol was directed by an onsite, California Registered
Geologist:
I) A backhoe was used to excavate a representative sample of native soil
and bring the sample to surface grade for callection;
2] A registered geologist pushed a 2 by 6 inch brass ring into an undisturbed
portion of the soil, leaving no head space;
3] The brass ring was then capped with a teflon lined lid, sealed with tape,
labeled, and stored in a cooler chilled with blue ice;
4] The soil sample was recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document to ensUre
sample integrity and traceability;
5] Analytical tests were carried out by Associated Laboratories, a California
Certified Laboratory in Orange, California.
At the conclusion of all activity, the excavation was backfilled with clean imported fill
material.
5.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
All soil samples collected from the subject site were analyzed in accordance with California
Department of Health Services method (CA DHS] for "total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline"
('rPH-g] and by EPA method 8020 for volatile aromatics [BTXE]. The analytical results of soil samples
collected from the excavation are presented in Table 7, 8 and 9. Laboratory data sheets and
chain-of-custody documents are presented in Appendix C. Unless otherwise noted, units for all
analyses are expressed in milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg], which are equivalent to parts per
million [ppm].
'Project: AEC 94C-t450 9
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 7
Soil Sample Results - 8270
06123/94
(ppm]
Constituents Dry Well @ 45' Dry Well @ 52' 7" Detection Limits
Acenaphthene ND ND 0. I
Acenaphthylene ND ND 0. t
AIdrin ND ND 0.1
Aniline ND ND 0. I
Anthracene ND ND 0. I
Benzo Iai anthracene ND ND 0.t
Benzo lb] fluoranthene ND ND 0.1
Benzo [k] fluoranthene ND ND 0.t
Benzo [al Pyrene ND ND 0.1
Benzo [ghi] perylene ND ND 0.1
Benzoic Acid ND ND 0.1
Benzyl Alcohol ND ND 0. t
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND ND 0.I
alpha-BHC ND ND 0. I
beta-BHC ND ND 0. I
delta-BHC ND ND 0. I
gamma-BHC ND ND 0.1
bis [2-chloroethyl]ether ND ND 0.t
bis [2-chloroethoxy}methane ND ND 0.I
bis 12-ethylhexyllphthalate ND ND 0.1
bis [2-ahloroisopropyl]ether ND ND 0.1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND ND 0.1
4-Chloroaniline ND ND 0. I
2-Chloronaphthalene ND ND 0. I
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND ND 0.t
Chrysene ND ND 0. I
4,4-DDD' ND ND 0.1
4,4-DDE' ND ND 0. I
4,4-DDT' ND ND 0. I
Dibenzo {a,h} anthracene ND ND 0.I
Dibenzofuran ND ND 0. I
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND ND 0. I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 0.I
t ,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 0. I
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 0.I
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND ND 0. I
Dieldrin ND ND 0.t
Diethyl phthalate ND ND 0. I
Dimethyl phthalate ND ND 0.1
2,4-Dinitrotolune ND ND 0. I
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ND 0. I
Di-n-oatylphthalate ND ND 0. t
I, 2-Diphenylhydrazine ND ND 0. I
Project: AEC 94C-t450 10
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 7 - [continued]
Soil Sample Results - 8270
O6123/94
[ppm}
Constituents Dry Well @ 45' Dry Well @ 52' 7" DetectiOn Limits
Endosulfan sulfate ND ND 0. I
Endrin Aldehyde ND 'ND 0.'1
Flouranthene ND ND 0.'1
Florene ND ND 0. I
Heptachlor ND ND 0.'1
Heptachlor expoxide ND ND 0. I
Hexachlorobenzene ND ND 0.'1
Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND 0. t
Hexachloroethane ND ND 0.'1
Indeno ['1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND ND 0.1
Isophorone ND ND 0,'1
2-Methylnaphthalene ND ND 0.'1
Naphthalene ND ND 0. I
2-Nitroaniline ND ND 0. I
3-Nitroaniline ND ND 0.'1
4-Nitroaniline ND ND 0.'1
Nitrobenzene ND ND 0.'1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND ND 0.'1
Phenanthrene ND ND 0.'1
Pyrene ND ND 0.'1
'1,2,4-Trichlorober'.zene ND ND 0. t
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND ND 0.'1
2-Chlorophenol . ND ND 0. I
2,4-Diahlorophenol ND ND 0.'1
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND ND 0. '1
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ND 0. I
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND ND 0. I
2-Methylphenol ND ND 0. I
4-Methylphenol ND ND O. "1
2-Nitrophenol ND ND 0. I
4-Nitrophenol ND ND 0. '1
Pentachlorophenol ND ND 0. I
Phenol ND ND 0.'1
2,4,5-Triahlorophenol ND ND 0. I
2,4,6-Triahlorophenol ND ND 0. I
Benzidine ND ND I.
Endosulfan I ND ND 0.1
Endosulfan II ND ND 0.'1
Endrin ND ND 0.1
Hexaahlorocyalopentadiene ND ND 0.1
2-Napthylamine ND ND t.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ' ND ND 0. I
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND ND 0. '1
Project: AEC 94C-1450 t t
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
TABLE 8
Soil Sample Results
06123/94
Lopm]
Sample I.D. 418. t Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene
Dry Well @ 45' ND ND ND ND ND
Dry Well @ §2'7" ND ND ND ND ND
Detection Limits: 50 0.05 0.05 O. 10 0.05
TABLE 9
Soil Sample Results
06129/94
[ppm]
Sample I.D, TPH-g TPH-d Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene
NSW-t I' ND ND ND ND ND ND
SSW-8' ND ND ND ND ND ND
ESW-6' ND ND ND ND ND ND
WSW-8' ND ND ND ND ND ND
NB-12' ND ND ND ND ND ND
SB-t0' ND ND ND ND ND ND
WB-10' ND ND 'ND ND ND ND
Detection Limits: 5 t0 0.005 0.005 0. '15 0.005
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Three large diameter auger borings were advanced in the area of the dry well. The first boring,
located south of the dry well, was 4-feet in diameter and drilled to a depth of 20 feet BGL. The
second boring, located west of the dry well was 2-feet in diameter and drilled to a depth of 20
feet BGL. The third boring was located in the center of the dry well, and drilled by advancing a
4-foot auger through 6-foot diameter steel casing to 35 feet BGL, then augering and reaming to
a depth of 52 feet BGL. All borings were backfilled with a 2-sack sand slurry to about t0 feet BGL.
Following the large diameter auger activity, additional soil was removed from the area around
the dry well using a backhoe to ensure that no remnant dry well gravel or impacted soil remained
in place. The'result of this activity was an 11 by t4 foot rectangular pit with depths from 8 to 12
feet BGL centered over the area formerly occupied by the dry well.
Two soil samples were c~llected from the 6-foot diameter boring at 45 and 52.7 feet BGL and
analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as waste oil, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes,
semi-volatile organics, lead, and beryllium. Analytical results indicated non detectable
concentrations for all constituents analyzed except lead; which recorded concentrations of 3.3
and 4.4 mg/kg. These lead concentrations are below both the Soluble Threshold Limit
Concentration and the Total Threshold Limit Concentration.
Project: AEC 94C-1450 12
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
Seven soil samples were collected from the floor and sidewalls of the surface excavation and
analyzed for TPH-g, TPH-d, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes. Analytical results for these
samples were non detectable for all constituents analyzed.
Approximately 129 tans of impacted soil was removed by auguring and excavation pracedures.
'this soil was stOckpilec~ on plastic sheeting and disposed of at~Envirocycle, Inc. in McKittrick,
California. An additional 6 cubic yards of unimpacted soil were removed from the area-
surrounding the dry well and staged in a separate area. ..
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the conclusions presented in this report, AEC recommends that no further action be
performed and respectfully request final closure for the dry well.
8.0 lIMITATIONS
This work has been performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental science
and engineering practices. Conclusions and recommendations are based upon information
collected and compiled during this investigation. Soil samples for this project were collected on
a finite grid. The analytical results pertain to discrete samples and are not to be misconstrued
as representative of Unsampled areas. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given.
Project: AEC 94C-t450 13
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
Dry Well Excavation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
9.0 CLOSING
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service to the Mr.
Chuck Haddad on this project. If there are any questions or additional information required
regarding this report, please contact our office at [805] 831-4646.
Sincerely,
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
~thah L.LB'uck ~
istered Environmental Assessor ~t508
This report has been technically reviewed by:
I~h A: Du'~"woody, II1~/-''z~
ornia Registered GetSIogist #5504
_
DOC56AB
Project: AEC 94C-{450 14
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ·
'Appendix A'
PROJECT MAPS/' FIGURES
-e KRAZAN SOIL BORINGS
EC - SITE MAP - FIGURE
A Haddad Dodge 1
4001 California Avenue
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS
P.O. BOX40~?2 BAI(ER~FIELD, CA 99384 County of Kern · Bakersfield, Califomla
PARKING
DRY WEll.
AUTO R£PAIR BUILDING :
DRY WELL
~1~ SOIL BORING
/ E~ if'~ - Boring Location - FIGURE
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS
EXCAVATION UMT8
:
. NSW-11'
NB-12' · DRY WELL '
SLURRY COLUMN TO 20' ,~ ~~ ~ i ~ t ~ , ::
i i SLURRY COLUMN
illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIl~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~
[ SSW'8' '
· SAMPI.~ LOOATION ~md I.D. :
0 ~.$ -
ScaJe 11n.-2.Sft. .
- Samplo Location Map - FIOURE
4001 Califomla Avenue 3
aova~tc~-~ ~,vt~t~arrat. co~:~,n'~ Ooun~ o~ K®m · I~ke~ld, C,lffomla
I :. . /ESW-e
I WSW~' ,; ..
NSW-11' ,
NB-12'.~~ ~/,
~mv~°n~ ~ Slu~ ~lumn
!
DRY WE~'
~10 S~P~ I.D. ~;
,I
~ S~P~ L~A~ON
DRY ~- 5~
SC~
.,. ,APPendix B' - .'
BORING LOGS
SaI~PLE ~o U.S.C.S. ' ~.OG
= WELL DEPTH PID I~FIVAL LIT lC DESCRIPTION
DETAIL (ppm) _m_?WVCOUNT LOG
I I SM SAND (SM): Dark brown, slightly dense, loosely consolidated.
5
-0- 3~ fln~-grainsd, moderately moist, no apparent hydrocarbon stain or
-- 10 ~ 2 I sw SAND (SW): Brown-tan. slightly dense, unconsolidated, coarse-
-0- 3 grained, moderately moist, no apparent hydrocarbon stain or
~ 15 --- 2 · sw SAND (SW): Tan, sligh~y dense, unconsolidated,
4.4 5 coarse-grained, moderately to slightly moist, no
apparent hydrocaxt3on stain or odor.
m 20 ~ 4 I SW SAND (SW): Tan-buff, slightly dense, unconsolidated, coarse-
5.9 5 grained, Nightly moist, no apparent, hydrocarbon stain or odor.
~ 25 ~ 4 I SW SAND (SW): Tan-buff, slighlly dense,
11.6 6I unconsolidated, coarse-grained, slightly moist, no
__ apparent hydrocarbon stain or odor.
I SW SAND (SW): Tan-brown, slightly dense, unconsolidated,
~ 30 11.9 6 coarse-grained, slighliy moist, no apparent hydrocarbon stain
9 or odor.
AEC CONCh.,-,:, WELL/BORING LOG
P.O. BOX 4087E BAKERSFIF~_D. CA
PROJECT Hedded ~ LOCATION 4001 California Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
WEU~O.~Ne.O. B-4 SURFACE ELEVATION WEM.HEADELEVATION N/A
DATE DRIM.ED 05-25-94 LOGGED BY J. Buck REWEWED BY J. DUNWOODY
DRILUNG COMPANY Melton Drilling_ DRILLER METHOD HOLLOW STEM AUGER
BORE HOLE DIAMETER 8 INCH TOTAL DEPTH ~o' DEPTH TO WATER: INITIAL. STATIC
CASING TYPE N/A DIAMETER N/A SCHEDULE N/A .INTERVAL N/A TO N/A
SCREEN TYPE N/A DIAMETER N/A SLOT SIZE N/A INTERVAL N/A TO N/A
FILTER PACK TYPE N/A INTERVAL N/A TO N]A
SURFACE SEAl. TYPE N/A INTERVAL N/A TO NJA
NOTES
,S~lE~ ~o U.S.C.S. LiT,~,,GiC~
· WELL DEPTH PID I~VAL
DESCRIPTION
DETAIL (ppm) _m_ ~nea:~OUNT LOG
COBBLE ZONE O 33'
8 B SC SAND (GC): Tea-buff, yellow, moderately dense,
~ 35 ~ 14.8 14 unconsolidated, coerse-gr"inod, rock fragements, sllgh'dy
m 40 '"- 16.4 14 I SW SAND (SW): Yellow-ten, moderately dense, u.ncons, olidat.~l.,
14.5 8 I SP SAND (SP): Brown-tan, moderately dense, unconsolidated,
-- 10· medium-grelned, moderately moist, no appreat hydrooarbon
st-in or odor.
. 50
8.4 14 AT 40.5' I~ ~ conglom~mt~ ~ ~ d,~y m,~t~, mod~tel¥
__ 18 moist, no apparent hydnx:aJtx~ st"in or odor.
55
~ 60 ~
65--
AOVANCED~'~,ONME~= CO~C~,'= WELL/BORING LOG ~ o~ ~
~i~['LE ~O U.S.C.S. LITi~OGIC DESCRIPTION
- WELL DEPTH PID I~RVAL LOG
DETAIL (ppm) _~WCOUNT
I m SM SAND (SM): Dark bmw~, sligMly dense, loosely
5
consolidated,
.0- 2__ fine-grained, sllghtty moist, no apparent hydrocarbon stain or
odor.
m 10 -- 2 m sw SAND (SW): Tan-brown. slightly dense, unconsolidated,
6.9 3 medium-grained, moderately moist, no apparent hydroca~oon
m 15 m 3 m sw SAND (SW): Buff-white, ailgh~y dense, unconsolidated,
20.2 5 medium-grained, sligMly moist, no apparent hydrocartx)n
-[] ~lain or odor.
~ :)0 '~' 4 m sw SAND (SW): Yellow-tan, slightly dense, unconsolidated,
18.4 $m coarse grained, moderately moist no apparent hydroea~on
m. P5 S ·
~P.0 0 SW-GC SAND ($W-GC): Yellow-ten, slightly dense, unconsolidated,
m
coarse-grained, gravelly, moderately moist, no apparent
-- hydrooad)on stain o~ odor.
m sw SAND (SW): Buff-yellow, moderately dense, .
8 unoonsolldatecl, medium to coarse-grained, slightly moist, no
~ ~ ~ 17.2 10 apparent hydrocarbon slain or odor.
AEC =v,,,vc=o £NVI, ONMENTAL
PROJECT H~lded Dodg~ LOOAllON 4001 Celffoml~ Avenue, _R~k~'~l~Wd, CA
WEARING NO. B-5 SURFACE ELEVAllON WEM.HEAD £LEVATION N~A
DATE DRIU.ED 05-~5-94 LOGGED BY J. Bu~k R~VL~A~-D BY J. DUNWOODY
DRILMNO COMPANY Molton Ddllln~ DRIU. ER ~Ei'HOD HOU.OW SI'EM AUGF. R
BORE HOKE DIAMETER B INOH TOTAL DEPTH ~O' D£PTFm TO WATER: INmllAL STATIC NIA
OA~INGTYPE N/A DIAUg'I'gR N/A 8OFIEDULg I~A INTERVAL N/A TO I~A_
SOR£FN TYPE N/A DEAMETER R/A $1.OT $1Z~ N/A INT£RVAm NIA TO N~A
INI~RVAL NIA TO N/A
FILTER PACKTYPE' N/A INTi~RVAK NIA TO
SURFACE SEALTYP~ NIA
NOTES .
WELL DEPTH PID S~tLE ~O U.S.C.S.
~VAL LOG LIT lC DESCRIPTION
DETAIL (ppm) _m_n_WCOUNT
COBBLE ZONE O 33'
m 35 ~ 11.4 5 I MC SILT (ML): Brown, moderately compact, sandy In part,
__ 9 moderately moist, no apparent hydrocafoon stain or odor.
40 ---- 14.2 14 I GC SAND (GC): Yellow-tan. moderately dense, unconsolidated,
coarse-grained to rock fragements, moderately moist, no
18[] apparent hydroce,'bon odor or stain.
. 45 .--- 18.9 20 B SP SAND(SP): Brown, moderately dense,I°°selycons°lldated'
~ 20~ fine-grained, slightly moist, no apparent hydrocarbon stain or
odor.
---- 50 '--- 9 B SP SAND (SP): Yellow-brown, moderatly de~se,
11.2 14~ unconsolidated, fine to medium grained, sllgMly moist, no
-- apparent hydrocarbon stain or odor.
m 55 ---.
~- 65 ~
co~c '= WELL/BORING LOG 2 of
LABORATORy. REPORTS./.
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTS.
LABO~TO~IES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report! 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-1
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 5 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94 ~
8:15D/~ BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by'D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method ~ Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd party Interpretation.
4100Atlas Cc. · Bakersfield, CA ~ · (1905) 32-7~911 · FAX (E]0b-) 3L~-1918
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-3
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ~ 15 10' WEST OF DRY WELL Sis/~PLED ON 5-25-94
8:25AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervis~ · ;
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the sul3mi~ng party. BC Laborat~es, Inc. assumes no responsit~lity for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd party Interpretation
4100Ar3as Or,. · Bakersfield, CA ~]3019 · (BOb-) 327-4911 · FAX (805) :~:~7-1 ~1 El
LABOP, ATOPlIES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-5
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 25 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94 ®
8:35AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date'Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert.. ~1186
Department supervisor/% · ·
_All results listed in this report are for the exclugve use of the submi~ng p~rty. BC Labora~rles, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~d ~ ~m~.
· 4100AUas C'c. · Baker~-field, CA 93308 · (l~)0b-~ 3~-~4911 · FAX(81Qb--) ~-1~18
LABORATO~II~S
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-7
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 35 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SD/~PLED 0N'5-25-94 ®
8:55AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor 0
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the sulxnitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation.
41OOAtlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA
LABO;::la. TORIE~S
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIROBRHENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
'-' P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/02/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-8
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ~ 40 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SD/HPLED ON 5-25-94
9:03AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample. Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department SupervisorO
All results lismd in this report sro for the exclu sive use of the submi~ng pony. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report o~taration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation.
4100Arias IL"t.. Bakersfield. ~ ~. (l~0b--)~-°7-4~ll I · F:~X (E]I2~) ~-1~18
LABORATORIES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petrole%un Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~:. 94-05544-9
BD=KERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample'Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:llAM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH bY D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0..005
Total Xylenes None Detected .mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department. Supervisor
Ail results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting Party. BC Laboralories, Inc. assumes no respon sil~lily for re;)~r[ alteration, sepsration, delschment or Ihlrd Pan'Y in[erpremlion.
410OAtlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA ~)~)08 · [151(2)~ 3~::~7~491 1 · F:AX (E)Ob-) ~::r7-1~18
LABORATOI~IES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTA/~ CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/02/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-10
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 50 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:16AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department ~
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party interpretation.
4100AUss Or. · Bakerstield, CA ~B~B01B · (E]C]~ 32'7-,4911 · FAX (E]05'] :5~::~7-1 ~18
LABO~ATORIES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVD=NCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-12
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 10 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SD/~PLED ON 5-25-94
10:05AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Superviso~
AIl results listed in this report are for lhe exclusive use of the submitting parly. ]C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd parly interprelati~.
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD #206 Lab ~: 94-05544-14
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805~831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 20 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:14AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ~ Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department S~
All results listod in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd party Interpretation.
4100 Atlas Ct. · Bake,~f, eld, CA ~ · ~ 327-491 I · FAX ~ 3~:~7-1 c~11~
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVAIgCED'ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611
Date
of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-16
BA/<ERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 30 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SD~IPLED ON 5-25-94
10:26AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. M~nual. Method- Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor O .'
Ali results lis~ed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submi~ng party' BC Lab°ra~ries' Inc' assumes n° resp°n sibtlily f°r rep°rt alterati°n' separatl°n' detachment °r Ihird ParlY InterPrelati°n'
LABORATOI::IIES
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONT~ENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of ..
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/02/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-17
BD/~ERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 35 10' wEsT OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94 ~
10:34AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method o Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date. Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor-/
~.11 results listed in this report are f~ the exclu~ve use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or lhlrd party Interpretation.
4100 Atlas O::;. · EBeker~-field; CA 9~08 · (805] :3=m~-,491 I · F:AX ~ ~c~7-1C:Jl 8
LABORATOI::~IE S
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-18
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:39D/~ BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units , Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor -~ ~ ::~
AIl results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submtffing party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for repo~ alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd party Interpretation.
.4100Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield. ~ 9~]OIB · ~ :327-,4~1 I · F=.~< (EI2)b-) ~:::~7-11~18
LABORATO~IIES
- Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVD/gCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
Report: 06/02/94
P.O. BOX 40672
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-19
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:49AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/~g 1.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Sup~
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submi~tng p~rty. BC Laboretodes, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or bhlrd pan',/Inmrpremtion
4100~tlss Ct. · Beker~field, CA ~ · [151C~ 327~491 1 * FAX {B(i~3L:::r7-1918
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL cONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/07/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-20
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 50 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
ll:00AM BY J.B.
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/06/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constitu____~ents Results Units Limit
Total petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O.H.S. Cert.
Department Supervisor-/
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting Party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or.third Party Interpretation
41 O0 ~'r-Jas Cc. · Bakersfield: CA ~ · ~ .'=1~7-~,~)1 I · F.z~,X [E)0~ ::~::~7-1 ~11~
L~BOI~ATORIES
Halogenated Volatile OrganicAnalysis
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
Report: 06/06/94
P.O. BOX 40672 Lab ~: 94-05544-18
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL S~PLED ON 5-25-94
10:39AM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method 8010 Sample Matrix: Soil'
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units . Limit
Bromodichloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected m~/k~ 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
i,l-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg. 0.005
1,2-Dichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane · None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005.
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting pony. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, sepmation, detachment or third partylnterprelatiof~
41 OlD Ar~as Oc. · EBakersfield, CA ~)~)08 · [15)0~) 327~491 I · FAX (15](2~ 3~7-1 918
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-18
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:39AM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
All resulm listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or Ihlrdparly tnterprelation.
LABORATORIES
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis
ADVANCED ENVIRONI~ENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Dateof
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-19
BD/<ERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: ' John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDD/) DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAI~PLED ON 5-25-94
10:49AM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method 8010 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Bromodlchloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Al resultslistedin thisreporta[e for theexclusiveuseofthesubmiffing party. BC Laboratories, lnc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachmentorlt, irdpar~/interpretation.
4100 Atlas Cc. · Bakersfield; r__,A ~)3308 · (E]0b--] ."4~7-,491 I · FAX [1B0~ 3~:r'/-1918
LABO~LATORIES
Halogenated Volatile OrganicAnalysis Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-19
BAKERSFIELD, CA..93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831r1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:49AM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Departme~nt~
AIl results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd paw inm~mtion. · ' 4100Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA ~)3:308 · (E](2)~ 3~::~7-4911 · FAX (1~2)5) :327-1918
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis
ADVANCED ENVIRObq~ENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-8
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 40 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:03;LM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method 8010 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Bromodichloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2oDichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None-Detected mg/kg 0.005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpremtibn.
41 00At]as Or. · Bakersfield, C.~ ~ · (5112)5) ~--~7-491 I . FAX (80~) ~c:~7-1 ~1 E]
LAE)OF::~ATOFqlE S
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Page. 2
ADV/~NCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-8
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 40 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:03AM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Departm~r
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the sut)mi~ng pony. BC LaboretoHes, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third pony Interpretation.
410OAtlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA ~)~)~(D8 · l~)(2~') ~91 I · FAX (l~Ob-) ~::rF-1911B
LABORATORIES
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROD/) ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-9
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL S/LMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:llAM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method 8010 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Bromodichloromethane None Detected 'mg/kg 0.005
Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2oDichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0 005
1,2-Dichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0 005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0 005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0 005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0 005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0 005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0 005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0 005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0 005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
AIl results listed in this report are for the exclusive u~e of ~e submitting Parly. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility fbr report alteration, separation, detachment or ~lrd ~ Ink.rotation.
4100Ar3as OC. · Bakersfield, CA c:~3308 · [1BI2~ ~911 ·
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O..BOX 40672 · Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-9
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 45 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:llAM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor~
All results listed in this report are for [he exclu siva use of [ha submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, det-chment or [hird party Inl~rprelation.
4100At]as CC. · Bakemsfield, CA ~ · ~ ~--~7-4~1 I · F~0< ~ ~c~7-1 ~11~
L/~BOP. ATOPlIES
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-10
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-4 ® 50 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAbIPLED ON 5-25-94
9:16AM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method 8010 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Bromodichloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
'Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform 'None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
All results listed in this report ara for the exclusive use of the submitling porty. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separaUon, detachment or third party interpretation.
~ifI)AUas Ct. · Bakersfield. CA ~]C)8 · (Sf~ ~--~7~91 I · F~X (E](2b-) ~]L::~7-1~18
Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-10
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Descr~ptlon: HADDAD DODGE:~ B-4 ® 50 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
9:16AM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert.
Depar tm~up~ ~-
A!I results listed in this report are f~ the exclusive use of the submitting pan'y. BC Laboratories, Inc. ~ssumes no responsibility for report alteration, sepm. afion, detachment or third party in~e~remtion.
4100Atlas ~---~c. · Bakersfield, ~ ~ · (El(Db-) 3~-°7~4911 · F~X ~ 3~::~7-191 El
LABORATORIES
Halogenated Volatile organicAnalysis "
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTD, L CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-17
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: B-5 ~ 35 10' WEST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94 ®
10:34AM BY J.B.
Test Method: EPA Method.8010 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
05/25/94 05/25/94 06/03/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Bromodichloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromoform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Bromomethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Carbon tetrachloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloroform None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Chloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dibromochloromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
· 1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Dichlorodifluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total 1,2-Dichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,2-Dichloropropane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methylene Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Tetrachloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,1-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
1,1,2-Trichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichloroethene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Trichlorofluoromethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Vinyl Chloride None Detected mg/kg 0.005
AIl results listed in this reP°ri are for the exclusive use of the submiffing parly. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsib'lity for report alteration, separation, detachment or Ihlrd pan, y In~emfion.
4100 Atlas Ct.. Bake, ~f;eld,'CA ~)33DB · (l~]0b--) 3274911 · FAX [B(2b--] ~::::~7-1918
LABORATOI::IIES
.. Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Page' 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/06/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-05544-17
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE· B-5 ® 35 10' %~EST OF DRY WELL SAMPLED ON 5-25-94
10:34AM BY J.B.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Departmen~ Supervlsor~
All results listed in this report are fm the exclu sive use of the submi~ng party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third parly Interprelatior
4100Atlas Ct.. Bakersfield. CA 9~32)8 · [E](2)5) :~-°7-,4911 · F,GX L'EB0~ 3~7-1918
0I~.~ ~ ~1 ~ CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Client ' D ' ...., AnalyBie Requested
~ ~i~is~ ~: (8~re) Dae ~ ~e~ ~ ~[~ory: (Signature) Dae m
Client ,~ D Analysis Requested
~ fl ~ log~
Date
0 ' · · D. ~ ~e~ by:
~~'~ ~'/ ~/ ~'~,~.,~wm ~'~, ~ ..,..m,.o,~.,.,--
~ ~i~ ~: ($~re) ;D~e ~ ~e~ by ~r~: (~i~re) Date
· AD~ANCED ENVIRONMEN~A~ GONC~T~ IN~
F~ ~1~1-1~1 ~IE~, ~13
LABOFqATORIES
Purgeable Aromatics
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/24/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-1
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
TEST METHOD: EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/23/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
California D.O.N.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
AIl results listedin thls red, are ~ ~e exclu~ve use of ~e su~i~ng ~. BC ~mmdes. Inc. 8ssumes ~ res~nsi~li~ ~r re~ alteration, separaU~, de~hmentor ~ird~ln~remtion.
L4BORATOIqlES
Purgeable Aromatics
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/24/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab #: 94-06703-2
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ® 1530
HRS
TEST METHOD: EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/23/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/k~ 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for Itm exclu sire use of the submi~ng par'o/. BC Laboralories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third paW Interprelafion.
41OOAr3asOt. · Bakersfield, r_,A
L~BOI:~TOF~IE S
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/24/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-1
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/23/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum ',
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.
California D.O..H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
All results lismd ~ mis m~am ~ ~e exdu~ve u~ of ~e ~i~ng ~. BC ~mmdes, Inc. assumes no res~nsi~li~ ~r m~ a!~m~on, ~pam~, detachment or ~lrd ~ Inm~mmt~n.
4100A~as Ct. · Beker~-field. CA ~B3~01B · (80b-) 3~7~911 · FAX (1~ :2)~r7-1918
LABOI::~TORIES
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 06/24/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-2
BD/{ERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BA/fERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ® 1530
HRS
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date. Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/23/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Waste Oil) None Detected mg/kg 50.'
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor '~
All results lismd in this m~ am ~ ~e exclu ~ve u~ of ~e auditing ~. BC ~mmdes, Inc. assumes no res~nsi~li~ ~r m~ ~m~on, separa~on, detachment or ~1~ party Inm~mm~on.
4100A~as Ot. · Baker~Seld, OA ~)~C)E) · [']5)05) 3L=r7~91 I · FAX L1B0b-) 32'7-1918
LaBO. RATOI::IIE S
ADVANCED ENVIROb-MENT~-L CONCEPTS 611 Date Reported: 07/05/94 page
P.O. BOX 40672 Date Received: 06/23/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Laboratory No.: 94-06703-1ADD'N
BAFd~RSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Beryllium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75 75.
Lead 3.3 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques, to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods. for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Superviso~ ..; ·
All resulzs listad in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboretades, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation.
4100Atlas OC. · B~kersfield, ~ ~ · (15~5) 327-4911 · FAX {E]0~ 32'7-1c~11~
LABO;:UkTO;:::II~S
Base Neutral and ACid Extractables
Organic Analysis
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-1ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06'-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
Test Method: EPA Method 8270 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ® Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/29/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Acenaphthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Acenaphthylene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Aldrln None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Aniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (a) anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (b) fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (k) fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (a) Pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (ghi) perylene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzoic Acid None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzyl AlcohOl None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Butyl benzyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
alpha-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
beta-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
delta-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
gamma-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chlOroethoxy)methane None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chloroisOpropyl)ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Bromophenyi phenyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chloroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Chloronaphthalene' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl .ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Chrysene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDD' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDE' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDT' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dibenzofuran None Detected: mg/kg 0.1
DJ-n-butyl phthalate ~ None Detected mg/kg 0.1
All results lismd in this m~ am ~ ~e exclu~ve use of ~e submiffing ~. BC ~mmdes, Inc. assumes no res~nsi~li~ ~r m~ alteration, sep;u-a~on, dem~ment or ~i~ mW Inm~mmtion.
"4100A~ss Cc. · Beker~eld. CA ~ · ~ ~:::r7~1 I · ~v~ (l~12)b---) ~7-191 8
LABORATORIES
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date Reported: 07/05/94 Page 1
P.O. BOX 40672 Date Received: 06/23/94
4400 ASHE ROAD %206 Laboratory No.: 94-06703-2ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
-- Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ® 1530
HRS
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Beryllium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75 75.
Lead 4.3 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submi~ng p~rly. BC Laboratories, Inc. =,ssumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third paW Interpretation.
410OAUas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93301~ · (E]0~ 327-4911 · FAX (15)0b--) ~::'7-1918
Base Neutrals andAcids (Continued) Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
.P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-1ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidlne None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dieldrin None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Diethyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dimethyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Di-n-octylphthalate NOne Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan sulfate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endrin Aldehyde None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Fluorene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor epoxide None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorobutadiene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
IsoDhorone None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Methylnaphthalene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Naphthalene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Nitroanillne None Detected mg/kg 0.1
3-Nitroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Nitroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Nitrobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamlne None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Phenanthrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Chlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dichlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dimethylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dinitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Methyl-4,.6-dinitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
AIl results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting parly. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for reporl aJteration, separation, detachment or third parly In~mtion.
-' 4100Atlas Ct;. · Bakersfield, CA ~)330E] · (E)05] ~4911 · FAX(Ei(Db--):~c~7-1918
,.
LAI~OF::~TORII:: S
Base Neutrals and Acids (Continued) Page 3
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611' Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab #: 94-06703-1ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-45' (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1430
HRS
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
2-'Methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Nitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Nitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Pentachlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Phenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzidine None Detected mg/kg 1.
Endosulfan I None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan II None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endrin None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Naphthylamine None Detected mg/kg 1.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
California D.O.N.S. Cert. %1186
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting port,/. BC Laborateries. Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or thirdparly interpretation.
4100 Ar~as Ct. · I~ake, ~f, eld. CA ~)33(2)8 · (E)0b---) 32-/~4~11 · FAX (E](2)5) 327-1 ~)18
L~8OPL,~TO;~IES
Base Neutral and Acid Extractables
Organic Analys~ s
D/)VANCED ENVIRON/~ENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-2ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1530
HRS
Test Method: EPA Method 8270 Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ®'Lab: Completed:
06/23/94 06/23/94 06/29/94
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Acenaphthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Acenaphthylene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Aldrin None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Aniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (a) anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (b) fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (k) fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.!
Benzo (a) Pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzo (ghi) perylene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzoic Acid None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzyl Alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Butyl benzyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
alpha-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
beta-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
delta-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
gamma-BHC None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NoneDetected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chloroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Chloronaphthalene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Chrysene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDD' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDE' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4,4-DDT' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dibenzofuran None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Di-n-butyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
All results lis~d in ~is m~ am ~r ~e excluMve u~ of ~e submi~ng ~. BC ~mmHes, Inc. assumes no res~nsi~li~ ~r m~ ~mfion, separafi~, detachment or ~iM ~ In~mmti¢
41 O0 A~ss Ct.. Bsker~ield. CA 93308 · ~ ~--~7~91 I · .;AX [~]05] 3~::~7-1 ~18
LABORATORIES
Base Neutrals and'Acids (Continued) Page 2
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-2ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ~ 1530
HRS
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
'Dieldrin None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Diethyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Dimethyl phthalate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Di-n-octylphthalate' None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan sulfate None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endrin Aldehyde None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Fluoranthene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Fluorene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Heptachlor epoxide None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorobutadiene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Isophorone None Detected mg/kg 0 1
2-Methylnaphthalene None Detected mg/kg 0 1
Naphthalene None Detected mg/kg 0 1
2-Nitroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0 1
3-Nitroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0 1
4-Nitroaniline None Detected mg/kg 0 1
Nitrobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
N-nitrosodi?n-propylamine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Phenanthrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Pyrene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Chlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dichlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dimethylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4-Dinitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Methyl-4,6-dinltrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
All results listed in this report ara for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party inte~'elalion.
41OOAtlas IL~c. · Beker~-ffield, OA ~)3~OI5) · (8(2)~ ~--~7~4~ll I · FAX (~--) :~:::~-1911=1
LABOP, ATO~IES
Base Neutrals and Acids (Continued) Page
ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date of
P.O. BOX 40672 Report: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Lab ~: 94-06703-2ADD'N
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description:. HADDAD DODGE-BAKERSFIELD,CA: DRY WELL-52'7" (SOIL) 06-23-94 ® 1530
HRS
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
2-Methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Methylphenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Nitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
4-Nitrophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Pentachlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Phenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2,4,6-TrichloroPhenol None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Benzidine None Detected mg/kg 1.
Endosulfan I None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endosulfan II None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Endrin None Detected mg/kg 0.1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene None Detected mg/kg 0.1
2-Naphthylamine None Detected mg/kg 1.
N-Nitrosodimethylamine None Detected mg/kg 0.1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamlne None Detected mg/kg 0.1
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor. -..
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Labora~Hes, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, sepo, ration, detachmentor third party Interpretetio~
41 O0 Atlas CC. · Bakersfield, CA ~ · (805) ~7~4911 · FAX (EKi~ :~]~:~7-1 ~]1 El
~'~ ~ ~/~ CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
. LABORATORIES
JUL 2 0 1993
AD%~%NCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS 611 Date Reported: 07/14/94 Page 1
P.O. BOX 40672 Date Received: 07/01/94
4400 ASHE ROAD ~206 Laboratory No.: 94-07007-1
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: John Buck 805-831-1646
Sample Description: HADDAD DODGE: COMPOSITE OF SP-A SPOILS PILE NE QUAD, SP-B SPOILS
PILE SE QUAD, SP-C SPOILS PILE NW QUAD, SP-D SPOILS PILE SW QUAD
SD/~PLED ON 7-1-94 S/~MPLED BY JOE
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents SamDle'Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Beryllium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75 75.
Lead 3.9 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported-represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitatlon Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC =. Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW -- "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA~SW-846, September, 1986.
~u~rperv~s~"
Department
. AIl resultslisted in this reportare for the exclusive use of the s~bmtffing party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for repro1 alteration, separation, detachm®nt of ~lfd ~ inm~mtl~.
4100AtJas CC..'E]aker~field, CA 9330~ · (E]05) ~4911 · FAX(B0b-) ~::~7-191B
~'~' CHAIN OF-CUSTODY RECORD
.m ...'::
· .<...,; .,, ~ , . , . .~,-._. .;,;.. ;..., ,.,?.'~, ,~.,., .:, ~;-
. .. .......... ~ ....... .'. ....... :,,.,..~>:,.,~
~ ~ '....:.. ...-'..... .. .'~ ~1 ..............................
.~: ~ .... ..:,~.... .... ':~...~ :: ~ ... ... ....., :.: .. -:. . , :. · . . . ,. ......
~:~0.'0':. / X~ ~ ~"'" ~"" "~"~ . ' ~ ~ ' '. ~'~ ~ ...... :- .~: ~ '~. :
~:.: : :>::..::.:::,,...~.....;.::: :..:.~.,.: ~, .-:...., · .... ', ..,..,:,, : --. ~-- ---- --.--
.,~?, .~,~...~.~...;~.,, ~.:.~..::. , .:~!~! ~ ~ .. ,., ......
.", · ' . '. ' ~ · . ,, ' ~ : ..... "~,, ;' .
...,:.,., :.:.,... :.:..: .....,..::,.,. ,,.,.:? ......
.... . ,. . . ., .... : .. /~.~~~-
~.:.~:...,:.~ . . ... :. :~
... " . :>. "-':.':: : ;::.. ..,'.'. :" ..~: -'... ~ .., ·
~, L~':,~:':;:: .~' ',':'* ' , , . ~/~1.1
ASSOCIATfD LABORATORIES
806 North Batavia- Orange, California 92668- 714/771-6900 FAX 714/538-1209
CLIENT
Advanced Environmental Concept (4283) LAB NO. G74293-01
Attn: Jon Buck
4400 Ashe Road REPORTED 07/05/94
Suite #206
Bakersfield, CA 93313
SAMPLE Soil RECEIVED 06/29/94
IDENTIFICATION Haddad Doge
4001 Californa Ave., Bakersfield
BASED ON SAMPLE As Submitted
NSW-11' SSW-8' ESW-6'
Total Hydrocabons
(TPH DHS) (mg/kg).
-Diesel ND<10 ND<10 ND<10
-Gasoline ND< 5 ND< 5 ND< 5
Benzene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005
Toluene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0..005 ND< 0.005
Ethylbenzene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005
Total Xylenes
(8020) (mg/kg) ND<. 0.015 ND< 0.015 ND< 0.015
ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES, by:
'['1~// Vice President
ESB/ql
NOTE: Unless notified in writing, all samples will be discarded
by appropriate disposal protocol 30 days from date reported.
TESTING & CONSULTING
chemical ·
The reports of the Associated Laboratories are confidential property of our clients and Microbiological ·
may not be reproduced or used for publication in part or In full without our written
permission. This Is for the mutual protection of the public, our clients, and ourselves. Enwronrnento} ·
~-1 IOM '
ASSOCZArED LABORATORES
806 North Batavia-Orange, Calitornia 92668-714/771-6900 FAX 714/558-1209
CLIENT
Advanced EnvirOnmental Concept (4283) LAB NO. G74293-02
Attn: Jon Buck
4400 Ashe Road REPORTED 07/05/94
Suite #206
Bakersfield, CA 93313
SAMPLE Soil RECEIVED 06/29/94
IDENTIFICATION Haddad Doge
4001 Californa Ave., Bakersfield
BASED ON SAMPLE As Submitted
WSW-8' NB-IR' SB-10' W-B-10'
Total Hydrocabons
(TPH DHS) (mg/kg)
-Diesel ND<10 ND<10 ND<lO ND<10
-Gasoline ND< 5 ND< 5 ND< 5 ND< 5
Benzene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005
Toluene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005
Ethylbenzene (mg/kg) ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005 ND< 0.005
Total Xylenes
(8020) (mg/kg) ND< 0.015 ND< 0.015 ND< 0.015 ND< 0.015
ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES, by:
EJSB/q1 ... . e . .
NOTE: Unless notified in writing, all samples will be discarded
by appropriate disposal protocol 30 days from date reported.
TESTING & CONSULTING
Chemical ·
The reports of the ASSOCiated Laboratories are confidential property of our clients and Microbiological ·
may not be reproclucecJ or used for publication in part or in full without our written
permission. This Is for the mutual protection of the public, our clients, and ourselves. Enwronmenfol ·
C-1 IOM
QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT G74293
QA/QC coNTROL NO. G74371-4 INSTRUMENT LOGBOOK Hyd 1-7
DATE G74371-4 ANALyzED Jul 1 1994 LL.B. PAGE LOCATION 56
DATE G74293 ANALYZED Jul 1 1994 SAMPLE LOG PAGELOC~T[ON
EPA 8015M/D.H.S.L.U.F.T. REPORTINGUN1TS mg/kg SAMPLE MATRIX Soil
COMPO t:ND SR SR1 RPD SA. SSR $SRI %RE- ..~REI RPD BI~'
GASOLINH 0 0 0 5 .£ 7 5 114 100 14 0
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
SR ...... SAMPLE .,~' O
SR1 .... SAMPLE DUPLICATE
RPD--- RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
S.A.---- ANALYTE SPIKE IN SAMPLE MATRIX
SSR ..... SPIKE RECOVERED AND SAMPLE
SSR1 .... SPIKE RECOVERED AND SAMPLE 'SRI'
%RE .... PERCENT RECOVERY OF SPIKE IN 'SR'
%RE1-- PERCENT RECOVERY OF SPIKE IN 'SRI'
BLK---- ANALYTE CONCENTRATION DETECTED IN LAB BLAN~
99% ..... UPPER/LOWER CONTROL LIMIT
95% ..... UPPER/LOWER WARNING LIMIT
8 ...... STANDARD DEVIATION
2s ........ 2 x STANDARD DEVIATION (WARNING LIMIT)
~8 ....... ~ x STANDARD DEVIATION (CONTROL LIMIT)
MEAN-- TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SPIKE RECOVERY
SURROGATE SPIKE DATE
BENZENYL FLUORIDE SPIKE CONCENTRATION OF
WITH A RECOVERY OF
BENT~ENYL FLUORIDE RECOVERY LIMITS OF TO
PASS / NO PASS /~/'~')2 ' DATETYPED Jul 5 1994 B133201
ACTION TAKEN
SPIKE SOURCE SH-R STANDARD LOT NO~ 52093
ANALYST MZ QA / QC COMPILER
//
QUALITY ~CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT ML00679
QA/QC CONTROL NO. G74370-1 INSTRUMENT LOGBOOK GC#2
DATE G74370-1 ANALYZED Jul 1 1994 I.LB. PAGE LOCATION 89
DATE ML00679 ANALYZED Jul 1 1994 SAMPLE LOG PAGE LOCATION
EPA 8015M/D.H.S.L.U.F.T. ma,oR'nNouNrrs mR/kg SAMPLE MATRIX Soil
COMPO t ~ND SR SR I RPD SA. SSR SSR I ..~ R_H ..~ RHI RPD BL
GASOLINH
:::::" ':i:i:i:! ii: !i!:i:!:! :iii i'!:'"' iiiiiii5 ~iii" i" ~::"'" 1115 iii'" "ii "~iiii ii!i" 5 ii::"!" 5iil i5:" '"ii. '"..!ii~ !~5!:"~!iiiiiiiill 5? 1151!5!!!:
SR---- SAMPLE .Jl' O
SRI---- SAMPLE DUPLICATE
RPD---- RELATIVE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
S.A.---- ANALYTE SPIKE IN SAMPLE MATRIX
SSR--- SPIKE RECOVERED AND SAMPLE'SR'
SSR1--- SPIKE RECOVERED AND SAMPLE 'SRI'
%RE-- PERCENT RECOVERY OF SPIKE IN'SR'
%RE1-- PERCENT RECOVERY OF SPIKE IN 'SRi'
BLK .... ANALYTE CONCENTRATION DETECTED IN LAB BLANK
99% .... UPPER/LOWER CONTROL LIMIT
95~ ..... UPPER/LOWER WARNING LIMIT
, ..... STANDARD DEVIATION
28 ....... 2 x STANDARD DEVIATION (WARNING LIMIT)
:t~ ........ ) x STANDARD DEVIATION (CONTROL LIMIT) .
MEAN- TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SPIKE RECOVERY
SURROGATE SPIKE DATE
BENZENYL FLUORIDE SPIKE CONCENTRATION OF
WITH A RECOVERY OF
BENZENYL FLUORIDE RECOVERY LIMITS OF TO
PASS / NO PASS DATEWPED Jul 2
/V
ACTION TAKEN
SPIKE SOURCE Shell-D STANDARD LOT NO. 0612~q
ANALYST Donna White QA / QC COMPILER / .~~~
' CHAIN
r -OF-CUSTODY RECORD -
(
~ ~ Y~I.~
· ADVANCEO ENVIRO~ENTAC C~PTS
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE, MANIFEST(S)',
NONHAZARDOUS IVIATERIAL ' -
MANIFEST
GENERATOR INFORMATION
p ..... (To be Completed by Generator)
rome h tN Mu B In Iud d P #: .9 . .
~ . D tination: Env'~oC c
Address: %~)1 California ~Xvenue C nsultant/ ontract r Advanced Enviror~,~ental Contel.
Phone: (.~05) 7)'~ t ..... Phone: 805 $31-154g'
......... .'iA ,
gnature × "
Generator hereby certifies to EnviroCycle (ECl) that the material to be delivered to ECl is nonhazardous in
California Code of Regulations {Title 22, Chater i i
a. pp!lc, able local laws or reo-,,,,; ..... -, ..... [P -. ), the Co.de ot Federal Renulat' ns ~;-,.',,.4:-- n .... a_ee_o_rdance with the
Iorth in referenced Profile ~'t~";~"".,~-"~ ma?..m.e .suojeet material does not contra P~'o'~:-~"~'-':~_ ~.~..r~t and CERCLA): and an
power and nut ,,--;,-, ,~ ~-.' "'~" "~s man,est ts s~gned on behalf Gl' o. --,--,~,u~or turmer agrees to COmlitions Y
· h_.... ,,, ~,md Generator to the term .. Generator by nnother part , such art ' . set
.............. ,,- ~, re resentat,ons warrnnties cert;C;,-.,,; ...... ._ S .... ~,,,.,,~' ~u~rmer agrees to be jointl nd
TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
~ KV$ TrarlsDort&l:~.=~.~._l'Fl¢. (To be Completed by Hauler)
, . ereby certsf'.v- of"/EnviroCvcle (ECl) that my car o to· ', . . · .
.o! Regulations {Title 22, Cha,,ter I1' the '"'--'- g':" .be .d~l~er.ed. to ECl ,s nonhazardous tn aceor ' · · _ _
taws or regular' -o ,,-.~ ,,--. '"~ /,. ~.ou~ ot reacts, Re umt,ons ' · .= dnng.,e w,t.h the Cahforma Cod~
o lo ........ -,-~ my car o ages not contn' CN'~ _ {.mclud'n~ RC. RA ,,!d CERCL^} and a '
g m P .... ~tagree to Indcmnllv and h,.,.4 ~..__, ..... ..' . .. ny a..~pphca.b, le local
~,mployees, a. nd.a.g~ents against any costs, liabilities ............. -.cas t:~l anci Its otlicers, directors,
· xte. nt such habthtles are caused . . , .damnse.s, penal,es, lines, attorne ' . · · · · . ·
s s,gned on behalf of Tra ....._b~_my ne, ghgence'will. ful misconduct or violatio- -,'--Y-S,-'f-e-e,s. ( .hab,ht,es )]ncurred by_ ECl to the
·. ,.- ,,c~oy another art su · - . -.,-,, app~;aole laws or re ulations Itt ' '
terms and conditions set 'ofro~h h el. e,,~p~ t_.y_~_ c.I1 party certlhes that st has tull nnw ,- ...4 .... ~.__:.. g..- . :: his manifest
representation~ ,,~.,: ..... ..-er.-. ..... .:,,, party lurther nerees to be ' intlv r- e
RECYCLING FACILITY INFORMATION
~ (To be Completed by ECl)
Specific Origin of Material: ~ '
...'es, hated Dro OfT Area: _Facility Invoice #:
End Destination: Ree'd l~ Print:
Amount:_ COST INFORMATION
.'-grin of Payment:
. xchase Order # (if appliCable)z__._ ......_
{Attach N0nhazardous. Material. 'Manifest)
/ ,,,:. ...
ADDRESS: '" " '" ~ ~' "'
PHONE: ..' ""
' TRANSPORTER INFORMATION ·
TRANSPORTER COMPANY' ..5
ADDRESS: '
PHONE: . ·
· · ' ' . : ' "[-i ," . [.
Bmt. G Om4A'nON . -.
TARE WEIGHT: ~' ', .
FORM OF PAYMENT:
AMOUNT: $ .. ' ' "..'
PURCHASE ORDER # (ii' applicable):
MATERIAL PROFIIJ;I SHEET ft (Must Be Included): ~'~ff'- /
I hereby certify to EnviroCycle (ECl) that my cargo t~ be delivered to ECI is nonhazardous in accordance.with the
California Code of Regn..lations (Title 12, Chapmr 1.1), the Code of Federal Regulations (including. , RCRA and
CERCLA), and an}' apphcabl¢ local laws or regulauons and that my cargo does not contain PCB s. I a..8~..e, to ·
indemnify and hold ha/mless £CI .a, nd its.o, fficers, _d.i, rectors, employees, a.nd agents aga. inst a,n.y costs, liabili~.es,
damages, penalties, fines, attorneys fees ( liabilities ) incurred by £CI to the extent such iiabihtiei are .causea
my negligence, willful misconduct or violation of applicable laws or regulations. If. this manifest is signed on behalf
of Transpo_ ncr ~ another part~, sm:h party certifies that it has full .pow? a. nd au, thority,to ,bin, cl. Tra..n?p2rt~r to
terms and conditions set fgrth herein..Such party m~t, her agrees to ~,.jomuy aha severa,y name warn transpormr
for all representations, warranties, certihcauons, aha agreements oi I ransporter.
FACIL[I'Ir INFORMATION
Type of Material: '
Origin of Material (GeneratOr and Location): .. ' , ....
Designated Drop Off Area:
End Destination'
GENERATOR INFORMATION
('robe Completed by Generator)
Profile Sheet No. (Mu~I B'O Included) PS#; 721. Destination: V~vicoCycle Inc.
Generator i inc}~;ad i. xxk~e Consultant/Contractor Adwmced
Address: 4001 Cnlit~ocnia Avenue
[;akersfiel(l; (~% Contact: .Jo~e~9)
Co,tacl: Qmck Haddad Pho,~: . (~Q5) ~31-164.)
Phone: (~303) 39~-J. GgG
O[~eratiolls
Print:Generator Representative/Generator's Authorized Agent Title
Signature ~~~.---' ' Date
Generator hereby eemifies to EnviroCyele ~CI) that the material to be delivered to ECl is nonhazardous in neeordnnce wi~ the
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Chapter I I), the Code of Federal Re~ulntion~ (including RC~ and CERCLA), and nny
applicable local laws or regulations and that the subject material does not contain PCB s. Generntor fu~her n~rees to conditions set
fomh in referenced Profile ~heet. If ~is mnnifest is s~gned on ~hnlf of Generntor by another patay, such patay ce~ifies ~t it has full
power nnd nu~ority to bind Generntor to the te~s nnd conditions set forth herein. Such pn~y lumber agrees to ~ jointly nnd
severally liable with Generator for nil representntions~ wn~nntiest certifications, nnd n~reements of Generator. .
~NSPORTER INFO~A~ON
~o ~ Completed by Hauler) ~- .
9o3b,~ Vehicle License ~: ~'-~ C~
'Phone: (.805) 5~9-t.~220 Lice~ ~ of Tractor:
Prmlr] rnns~rter or Driqer/Authorized Agent Signature Date /
! hereby ceflifv t~ En~iroCycle (ECl) that mv cargo to be delivered to ECl is nonhazardous in accordance with the California Code
of Regfilntion~ (Title 22, C~pter I1), the CSde of Federal Regulations (including RCRA and CERCLA), and any applicable local
laws or regulations nnd that my ~nrgo does not contain PCB's. lagree to indemnil~ and hold hn~less EC'l~nd its o~ers, directors,
employees, nnd n~ents against nny costs, liabilities, damages, penalties, fines, attorneys' fees ("liabilities) incu~ed by ECl lo the
extent such liabilities are caused by my negligence, willful misconduct or violation of applicable laws or regulations. If this mnnifest
is signed on behalf of Trnns~er by nnother pnfly, such party certifies that it has 1~11 ~wer nnd authority to bind Trnns~fler to the
te~s nnd conditions set fo~ herein. Such pn~y further agrees to ~ jointly nnd severnlly liable wilh Trans~er for nil
re~resenlntionsI wn~nntiesI ce~ificntions, and n~reements of Trnns~rler.- ·
~CL~G FA~ ~FOR~TION
~o ~ Completed by ECl)
Type of Material: Gross Weight: /'Z /
Specific O6gin of'Material: Net Weight: ~ ~ f ~' ~ Tons:
Facility Invoice a:
Designnted Drop Off Aren: Reed By {Print): -~/',~
Signature Dale
COST INFORMATION ~(~ @/~(~]~,
Amount'
Form of Payment:
Purchase Order # (if applicable)'
, ..... - ,.....~ .... '.:';:X:~:.; ~' :~. '.: >"' : ~':','. ':': · ' ' ' '-} :"' .... ' ' '" ...... "
' .' - ' - . ~ , ' - ' ' .. -:. ·- ,:- ' .~:. :' ,f.':2';~-".":. : ~: .' .'.. : ~ . .'
- P~C~sE O~ER ~ (if appli~ie):, ..'-'. .................... . '-' ................. ' ......
~o~ ~ of Reg~tio~ ~ifle' 22, C~pter 1 I), the g~de ot reae~egmations
C~CLA), ~d any a~li~ble local la~ or re~latiom and ~at my cargo aoes not c~n~n ~s.
in~ and hold ~e~ ECl and i~ office~, director, employees, a~d agenm a~:mt a~y eo~,
~ ann ~o~Uons ~t to~ ne~m. ~cn ~ l~er a~es to ~Omtly ann ~V~lly. llaOl~ ~.1~~ . ...,
..., ..... .'..' ::"':. ...... .
.... ';~,- ': ~:. ~ ' ' ' ' ' j ' I -.;-, ..?'..
, ,- .,-:?~:.~. :
~ ~: .................... .. ....... :.. ~:.....< ,,... ..... ... ........................ .. ........ · ............ . . ·
E d ~ "
NONHAZARDOUS MATERIAL
MANIFEST
GENERATOR INFORMATION
(To be Completed by' Generator)
Profile She~t NO, (Mu~t Be Included) PS#: 72.1. Destination: EnviroC¥cle~ Ina,
Generator :-:a<.lca<: £~,J~e CQnsultnnt/Contractor .A, dvanaed Errv-i_rorxnnntn! ConceT.
Address: 3;301 California Avenue
-- [:o. xersf].~.id, CA Contact: Joseph Dunwoodv
Contact: G,.uck ~addad Phone: (~305) 331-1646
Phone: (,i'3;35) 393-02b~
3ose~h L~nwoody . Operat:ion~ t. tanaser
Print:Generator,Re~p~/'sentntive/Generntor's Authorized Agent -l-atle
' Generator hereby certifies to EnviroCycle (ECl) that the material to be delivered to ECl is nonhazardous in accordance with the
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Chapter I I), the'Code of Federal Re~ulation,s (including R_C.RA and CERCLA); and any
applicable local laws or regulations and that the subject material does not contain PCB s. Generator tutti, er agrees to conoitions set
f6s:th in referenced Profile Sheet. If this manifest is s~gned on behalf of Generntor by nnother party, such party certifies that it has full
power .',nd authority to bind Generator to the terms nnd conditions set forth herein. Such party further agrees to be jointly and
severally liable with Generator for ail representations, wnrrnnties! certifications, nnd n~treements of Generntor. ,
TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
(To be Completed by Hauler)
Trnnsporter: r,,f~ .i'ransrx~rtation~ Inc, Driver's Name: ~"'
'.l'~''5337 Driver's License #:
Address: P.O. :'" -
;2a'_.:ersfieid~ CA 93333 Vehicle License #: "~"
Phone: (, .,V~ ~ 5%c;-5220 License # of Tractor:
/' .;.-/;/?/
"' ' '~ ......... :' ~ ......... ~ ;:"~ 'Date/
Print:Transporter or Driver/Authorized Agent Signa.luri~ /
I hereby certify to EnviroCvcle (ECl) that mv cargo to be delivered to ECl is nonhazardous in accordance with the California Code
of Re {dation~ (Title 22, Chapter i 1), the C~de of Federnl Regulations (includinlg RCRA nnd CERCLA), nnd any applicable local'
~., . ~ ..... ~.,;,,....a d~.t my ~nroo does not contain PCB's lairee to indcmnily and hold harmless ECi and its o~.l~.ers,__d_i_recto.,rs,
'"-~, .... ~""'iR'_'_"_"_-'_"5'.._"_'I _-~.'?Ld_~d u.~.a:,;.. ,4.mnoe_~ nePali(es fines, attorneys' fees ('liabilities") incurred Oy. ECl to..me
. .P__.~.._U ,:.,.:,:,: ........... a ~,,, ,,,,, ne-li-ence willful misconduct or violation of a~plicablc laws or regul?tio.n~ If this.ma?it?.st
iQts~'iZ%:~o'~'~:%'.'l'~T~llr'a~°s~%?oy'"a;noth%rGany~ such party certifies that it has full power and authority to .ina transporter.to me
terms and conditions set forth herein. Such party further asrees to be jointly and severally liable with Transporter for ail.
representations, warranties! certifications, nnd n~treements of Trnns~orler.
RECYCLING FACILITY INFORMATION
(To be Completed by ECl)
Tare Weight: _~ /
Specific Origin o£ Material: Net Weinlht: ..v4~ ~ ~,~--~' Tons:
Facility Invoice #:
Desin;nnted Drop Off Area: Rec'd By IPrim): .'?~ r/ ///'~c .fi' ~.-.
""~" "~' ' 'Date
Des,i.atio.:
Sisnmtlre
' ' COST INFORMATION
Amount:
Fom~ of Payment:
Purchase Order ~ (if applicable)'
~D~SS:
PHQ~: ....
~NSPO~ C0~A~'
ADD.SS: ·
~UCK ~[C~SE ~:
~CTOR
LICENSE
B~L~G WFO~A~ON ..
I here~ ce~ to En~roCycle ~C~
' te~ and conditions ~t f6~ he.in. ~h ~y fu~her a~ees to ~ointly and ~ve~lly liable ~i T~~
for all re~~ons, ~nties, cenit~cnuo~, nnd a~emen~
FAC~ ~FO~A~ON
T~e of Mat~: . '
O~gin of Mat~al (Gen~tor ~d Location):. . ~ ~~ .
Designated Drop Off A~a:
End Destination,
-ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS INC-
July '1, '1993
Ms. Flora Darling
Kern County Environmental Health Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 9330'1
Regarding: Dry Well Closure Work Plan ~"
Haddad Dodge
400'1 California Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Ms. Darling:
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. [AEC] was contracted by Mr. Chuck Haddad on behalf
of Haddad Dodge to prepare the Dry Well Closure Work Plan for the above referenced site.
Enclosed please find that report, which AEC is submitting for review.
Should you have any questions or require clarification on any aspects of the enclosed, please do
not hesitate to contact our office at [805] 83'1-'1646.
Respectfully yours,
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc.
~---~J--~oject ,~'~rdinator / Office Administrator
Attachments: Report ('1]
Distribution: '1/Addressee - REG MAIL
'1 ! Mr. Chuck Haddad
'1/Bksfld File
· ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN IN MIND ,,
44nn ~,~:~nAn ,.2(3R . RAKERRFIELD. CA93313 805t831-1646 * FAX 805/831-1771
KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATION RECORD - HH~P
OWNER/OPERATOR: BAKERSFIELD DODGE INC.
DBA: CHUCK HADDAD DODGE ADDRESS: P.O.BOX 41118, BKFLD.93389
ADDRESS OF VIOLATION: 4001 CALIFORNIA AVE. BAKERSFIELD CA. 93309
APN: 020-120-23-00-8 CT: 18 INSPECTOR: TERRY GRAY
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF INVESTIGATION
DAT~ TIHE NAF, RAT~VE
03/26/93 .7 UIC INSPECTION PERFORMED.
03/29/93 .3 COMPLETED E.P.A. INJECTION WELL REPORT.
~)3/30/93 .5 PREPARED FILE.
~3/3QJ93 .5 DRAFTED NOTIFICATION LETTERS TO HADDAD,
COLEMAN, AND CHRYSLER.
03/:~0/93 N/C RECEIVED KRAZAN REPORT FROM JOE DUNWOODY OF -
AEC.
~3/3~.~. 1.5 REVIEW OF KRAZAN REPORT NOTED ABOVE.
04/05/93 N/C RECEIVED CERTIFIED LETTER RESPONSE CARDS FROM
HADDAD & COLEMAN VENTURES, BOTH DATED
p4/02/93.
04/06/93 .2 COMPLETED PROP. 65 RELEASE FORMS.
04/07/93 N/C RECEIVED CERTIFIED LETTER RESPONSE FROM
CHRYSLER ATTORNEY, DATED 04/05/93
04/07/93 N/C CHUCK HADDAD CALLED & REQUESTED AN UPDATE. I
TOLD HIM I WAS WAITING FOR ANOTHER REPORT FROM
COLEMAN, BUT AS IT LOOKED I WOULD RECOMMEND
ADDITIONAL CHARACTERIZATION. I TOLD HIM TO
WAIT FOR CONTACT BY OUR OFFICE.
04/08/93 1.0 UPDATED FILE. SPOKE TO GARY GRUMBLES OF
COLEMAN. HE STATED THAT DURING THE U.S.T
INVESTIGATION, A GLEN HAYES STATED THAT A
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF INVESTIGATION PAGE 2
DATE T IP[E NARRAT I VE
04/08/93 CONT. DRUM OF WASTE OIL WAS SPILLED INTO THE DRY
WELL. REVIEWED THE ADDITIONAL REPORT RECEIVED
FROM COLEMAN. RECOMMENDATION THAT FURTHER SITE
CHARACTERIZATION BE PERFORMED.
5251 Office Park Drive ~'
Suite 200 .
RO. Box 9336
, cA Coleman
(605) 326-1141
FAX (805) 326-1139
April 9, 1993
Mr. Terry Gray
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield,. CA 93301
Dear Mr. Gray:
At your request I am passing along the remarks made to me by one of the Haddad employees
about the dry well on their leasehold (on which they were a subtenant to Chrysler Realty) at 4001
California Avenue in Bakersfield. Our organization, Coleman Ventures, is Chrysler's landlord but
we have no contract rights with Haddad.
We had demanded several times recently that Chrysler remove and close the underground tanks
at the leasehold, but they disagreed over the cost responsibility. Coleman elected to simply do
the closure and worry about resolving the costs later. Chrysler signed an access agreement to
let Coleman remove the tanks; we needed their permission since they control the site through
their lease. The access agreement also permitted Coleman to do an environmental evaluation
to meet a lender's requirement for a recent re-financing.
At the time the underground tanks were removed I visited the site to observe the work and also
looked at the dry well location. A Haddad employee, Mr. Hayse, remarked to me that Haddad
constructed the well and said he thought a quantity of oil had been poured into it during their
sublease. We have no verification of either of those comments, but the environmental work for
the refinancing reported some hydrocarbon detection at a 10' depth at that dry well but reported
non-detect at 20' (you have received a copy). Because of that result we expect a Chrysler (or
Haddad) workplan will be needed for the site, and because of the employee's comments we
required Chrysler to respond immediately. The lease prohibits Chrysler from damaging the
property which will ultimately be .returned to Coleman; based on that lease language we
demanded that Chrysler immediately investigate and then determine if a clean-up plan must be
prepared. It is my understanding that Chrysler then required that their subtenant Haddad
immediately comply with our demand, and I have been told that Mr. Haddad hired a consultant
and is doing that.
the,~e-are fu, l;t~estions, please feel free to contact me.
If
V~__~ruly o~urs,
GA UMBLES
Colemart Property Management Corp.
GG:klI.*44
cc: aerold Walsh
5251 Office Park Drive i~'~,
Suite 200 '~,,~
P.O. Box 9336
Co1¢
(805) 326-1141
FAX (805) 326-1139
April 8, 1993
Mr. Terry Gray
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Environmental Evaluation
of Haddad Dodge Facility
Dear Mr. Gray:
Enclosed are copies of' the Environmental Reports prepared by our consultants, Krazan &
Associates.
Upon your review,~.sho~ you have any questions please feel free to contact me or Jerold
Walsh. ?.--:7 /.-- . .
Very~tr_u~,.
Vice Present '
Co!ema. n Propedy Management Corp.
GG:kll
Enclosures
cc: Jerold Walsh
COX, CASTLE O NICHOLSON :
(R~TIRED)
RO.^LD ,. SlLWRM^N' S^.U~L N. GRUENBAU. LA~/YEP~$
MARLO _CAMARA SANDRA C. STEWART ........... R CHARU N' CA~T C --I--'~--;~'"""= ' -%L--
.~.~. ~. ~.~,. ~ .........~ ~p ~-r~ ~" 1993 ~o~ ~.o~. ~,~o .... ~oo~-~
- STANLEY W. LAMPORT ROBERT A. LURI~ 2 19 7 5
Mr. Terry Gray
Environmental Health Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: Environmental Evaluation of Haddad Dodqe Facility
Dear Mr. Gray:
As a follow up to our telephone conversation on March 29,
included with this letter is a copy of two volumes of the recent
environmental report put together by Krazan & Associates Inc. as
a result of the environmental work at the Haddad Dodge facility
at 4001 California Avenue.l/
As I indicated to you, the investigation work was done in
connection with a refinancing opportunity by the property owner,
Coleman Ventures, and followed up an initial "Phase I" survey by
Krazan & Associates. In the course of the investigation the
environmental consultant identified several problem areas which
we will require our tenant, Chrysler Realty, to assume
responsibility for. As I indicated to you in our telephone
conversation, I fully expect that the Chrysler Realty attorney,
however, will pass the liability along to their subtenant, Haddad
Dodge. The County, obviously, will not have to concern itself
with any disputes among those private parties, but I forward that
inf6rmation simply so you are aware of the relationships.
!/Limited Environmental Audit, Krazan & Associates, inc.,
Project E92-073 (Volume I and II).
Mr. Terry Gray
April 1, 1993
Page 2.
The areas that were of concern to Coleman Ventures involve
the consultant's report of silt and sand traps, the storm drain
system, the hydraulic lifts, and -- depending on the condition of
the silt and sand traps -- the sewer system. In the course of
the recent removal of the underground tanks we received
information from the subtenant that there may have been
petrochemical products poured into the storm drain. That is the
area of our primary concern at this point.
I have been advised by the attorney for Chrysler Realty that
they have commissioned Dames & Moore to undertake an evaluation
of that storm drain. I have passed along to the Chrysler Realty
attorney your instructions that Dames & Moore is to contact you
so that an evaluation plan can be prepared prior to the time that
any more investigation is done on that system.
I have further passed along to the Chrysler Realty attorney
your requirement that certain oversight fees must be paid by the
responsible parties for the site. I indicated to you that we
believe that ultimately Haddad Dodge will be liable for them, but
you indicated that the "PRP" notification letters would be sent
to all three parties, and that it would be~up to Coleman
Ventures, Chrysler Realty and Haddad Dodge to sort out that cost
exposure.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any other
questions in this matter. Coleman Ventures has the same interest
as your agency, and that is to get the problem corrected promptly
and completely.
Very truly yours,
P. J~rold Walsh '
PJW/ecd
\ltrs\0329L04,pjw
BAKER
HOSTETLER '
COUNSELLORS AT LAw '- ~'' :'
600 WInSHnU~ Bomzvaxn · LOS ANGEtaS, C^UmmX~A 90017-3212
(21a) 624-2400 · F~ (2131 975-1740
April 7, 1993
Mr. Terry L. Gray
Hazardous Materials Inspector
Hazardous Materials Management Program
Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Chrysler Realty Corporation/Haddad Dodqe
(Our File No. 74485-00049)
Dear Mr. Gray:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of
March 31, 1993, regarding the dry well located at 4100
California Avenue, Bakersfield, California. You sent that
letter to me as the attorney for the lessee.
Please correct your records regarding the name of
the lessee, which is Chrysler Realty Corporation, not Chrysler
Corporation as mentioned in your letter.
We will review the merits of your letter with
Chrysler Realty Corporation and proceed as appropriate in due
course.
Very trul.,y yours,
Donald C. Nanney~
Of BAKER & HOSTETLER
CLmrm,aNn. Omo Comus. Omo I)mmn~. Cotoz,,no ' HoustoN. Tmtas LON~ BF,~C~. C,u,n~e,N~ ~ Flmnm WaSmNmXlN. D.C.
(216} 621.0200 [614] 228-1541 (303) 861-0600 [713] 751-1600 [310) 432-2827 (407] 649-4000 ' [202] 861-1500
KERN COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE INCIDENT REPORT
REPORTING AGENCY REPORTING PERSON PHONE
KERN CO. ENV. HEALTH SERVICES TERRY L. GRAY (805).861-3636
LOCATION OF DISCHARGE OR THREATENED DISCHARGE DATE AND TIME OF KNOWLEDGE OF DISCHARGE OR THREATENED DISCHARGE
STREET ADDRESS: 4001 CALIFORNIA AVE. 04/05/93 HOURS -
CITY: BAKERSFIELD ZIP: 93309 SEC: T R
DBA BAKERSFIELD DODGE PROPERTY OWNER: COLEMAN VENTURES
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PARTY RESPONSIBLE OF DISCHARGE:
BAKERSFIELD DODGE INC! P,O. BOX 41118, BAKERSFIELD! CA 93384
AREA TYPE SCENE TYPE:
OI___[}IDUSTRIAL 04___RURAL/AGRI OI~_?TATE HWY 05___PUBLIC STRUCTURE 09__:OTHER WATER WELL 15__JOODED AREA
02~×_COMMERCIAL 05__WILD LANDS 02___COUNTY RD 0H_Z_PRIVATE STRUCTURE IO__AIRPORT/RAILYARD 24 DESERT
03___RESIDENTIAL 03___CITY RD 0?___CANAL/WATERWAY ll___EMPTY LOT 15__?RUSHLAND
99 OTHER:_SCHOOL ............. 04 PRIVATE ED 08 DOMESTIC WATER WELL 12___LAKE/POND 16___OILEIELD
SOURCE OF RELEASE CIRCUMSTANCES OF RELEASE CAUSE OF RELEASE
01___OIL REFINERY 01___WHILE BEING MANUFACTURED ti___DURING CONTAINER 01___EQUIPMENT FAILURE
02 CHEM, NANUFACTURER 02___WHILE IN STORAGE OR CONDUIT REPAIR 02 VANDALISM
03_](_HISC, FI×ED FACILITY 03_X_DURtNG NORMAL END USE 12___!LLEGAL DISPOSAL 03 ACT OF NATURE
!)4 MOTOR VEHICLE 04___WHILE BEING LOADED 96___THREATENED RELEASE 04 ACCIDENT
i)5___TRAIN 05__JHtLE IN TRANSIT ONLY: NO DISCHARGE 05 iLLEHAL DISPOSAL
06___AIRCRAFT OH___WHILE VEHICLE PARKED 9?___RELEASE OR INCIDENT 98___UNKNOWN
i)7 .... PIPELINE 07___DURING VEHICLE ACCIDENT MITIGATED AT TIME 9~_X_OTHER:INJECTION WELL
08 ~JNDERGROUND TANK 08 DURING FIRE/EXPL, OF REPORT
98 ~NKNOWN 09 DURING AiR CRASH 98 UNKNOWN
99___OTHER: ............... 10___WHILE ABANDONED 99___OTHER: ...............
LIST THE ONE, TWO, OH THREE MOST SIGNIFICANT SUBSTANCES DISCHARGED OR THREATENED TO BE DISCHARHED:
(1] CHEM, ~AME/MAJOR COMPONENT: WASTE OIL CONCENTRATION AMOUNT AT RISK ~HOU~T RELEAHED
COMMON ~AME: CHEMICAL { CHEMICAL t CHEMICAL t
HAZARD:_Z_TOXIC ___FLAMMABLE ___PURE ___SOLID [i] {i} 1]
___REACTIVE ___CORROSIVE ___HIX ___LIQ, [2] {2] 2]
___RADIOACTIVE ___WASTE __GAS [3] [3{ 3{
~OT ID NUMBER:
{2} CHEM, NAME/MAJOR COMPONENT: IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/DETAILS:
COMMON NAME: SOLVENT
HAZARD:'___TOXIC __FLAMMABLE ___PURE ___SOLID
___REACTIVE ___CORROSIVE ___MIX ___LI~.
___RADIOACTIVE ___WASTE ___GAS
DOT ID NUMBER:
{3} CHEM. NAME/MAJOR COMPONENT:
COMMON NAME:
HAZARD:___TOXIC FLAMMABLE ___PURE ___SOLID
___REACTIVE ___CORROSIVE ___MIX ___LI~,
___RADIOACTIVE ___WASTE ___GAS
DOT ID NUMBER:
HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONT~ION:
INDICATE ACTUAL ("A")OR PO+~.'""}'Y'AL ("P")
CHEM 1 CHEM 2 CHEM 3
01___AIR ..................
02___CANAL/WATERWAY INTERNAL USE ONLY:
03__LAKE/POND
04_X_SOIL P P IDENTIFICATION }
05___CROPS
OH___LIVESTOCK ................. INVESTIOATION REFERRAL MADE TO:
07__WILDLIFE ......
08 WOODED AREA HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT RANKINO:
09___DESERT
iO___BRUSHLAND .................. INFORMATION PHONED-tN? ¥ H IF YES, DATE .....
11 FOODSTUFFS TAKEN BY:
12__GROUNDWATEE .................. DATE REPORT RECEIVED BY HEALTH DEPT: ...............
13___DWELLtNO .................. COMPUTER INPUT (CHECK) CLERK'S INITIALS ........
14___HUMANS .................. DATE OF NOTIFICATION OF HEALTH OFFICER ...... BOS ....
99___OTHER: .................. DATE OF NOTIFICATION OF REDIA ......................
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY~ R.E.H.S. 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR '~ Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
March 31, 1993
Haddad Dodge
P.O. Box 41118
Bakersfield, CA 93384
SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT
4100 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD,. CA
Attention: Chuck Haddad
Dear Mr. Haddad:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property noted above has been
a~,~.,-mi,ed hv Kern County Environm~.~ta_!_Hea!th S.~.ryi'_ce_s Department (KCEHSD) to be
SENDER: I i identified as a dry well. This
' ¢om,!,3, items 1 and/re'2 for ad'qtional ,,rvic,,. J I also wish to receive the ~ the operator at the property
........... 'a'a~&'h' '--' I following services (for an extra
'~ [ I [ [ :Address
~-'~l ~ ~llllllll ~eliv r ~. etion 144.12(a), "no owner or
~'~ ] ~ ] / [ [ I I ; .e¥ '~ ~ that allows the movement of
- , I ~_ ! ! I ! I I for Tee
m ! '~ I ~, ~ I I I I ! [ , _ = Unnkin~ water, ]f the presence
· / --L_LJ / ~. inking water regulation.., or
· ~,l'.,~_,~ ,-d ~, el , .~.r..I ~-~ *~ I I I 15 ~1 I ~ e
': ~ g ~ ~[ ~~ I~~ ~ ~eipt for ~ ~ have been discharged to the
.'~ ,, . -/ ~D1 t~ T .~~ · ted under the Class V Shallow
, ~[~ I ~1~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ his not~ce or oroceedw~th the
~ ~[~[ /~~ :~l~,frequest~ sed copy of EPA-REGION 9
~ ~" ~~~~l~ :~ ' ':- ~ L ~LLS. ~e boo.et cites
~ ts~t o~.r. e :' . '-~ -~; ~' actor requirements, example
o0s~ m,o~ sa :ocedures. Be adhsed that
......... ' · ' ..... ~:' ........ J :" ':'~ ~':~,'".:~':~'~;? the EPA Closure Guideline
Boo,et.
[n accordance ~th Kern Coun~ Ordinance Code G-5541, Section 8.04.100, the Depa~ment
is authorized to charge for ~spections, renew of repo~s, and laborato~ se~ce costs
incu~ed in the pr°cess of obtainin~ compliance ~th any ~olafions noted. Be ad~sed that
you ~ be billed at the rate of $20.00 per hour for oversight dudn~ the abatement
~olations connected to thc Class V wcQ.
Haddad Dodge
Subject: Class V Shallow Injection Well
March 31, 1993
Page 2
If we may be of any further assistance, please contact this Department at (805) 861-3636,-
Extension 582.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Terry L. Gray
Hazardous Materials Inspector
Hazardous Materials Management Program
TLG:cas
cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
ATTN: Martin Zeleznik
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno
ATTN: Dale Essary
Coleman Ventures
ATTN: Gary Grumbles
Baler & Hostetler
ATTN: Donald Nanny
~gray~haddad.uic
.I
· ENVIRONMENTALHEALTHSERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. 2700 -M- Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301
i (805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX
March 31, 1993
Coleman Ventures
5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Bakersfield, CA 93309
SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT
4100 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, CA
Attention: Gary Grumbles
Dear Mr. Grumbles:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property noted above has been
determined by Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) to be
the site of a Class V shallow injection well. The well has been identified as a dry well. This
notice is being sent to you because you have been identified as the contact person for the
owners, Coleman Ventures, of the property listed above.
Pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations 40 (40 CFR), Section 144.12(a), "no owner or
operator shall.., operate [an injection well].., in a manner that allows the movement of
fluid containing any contaminant into underground sources of drinking water, if the presence
'" .... ....... ~'-~'-~,,,, a~ any. nrima!w:d[!~king water regulation.., or
l~ll~lOatl_NtffiJ~tl 31j.$llNoO o~zo~:~.' 'reel
'=-:~~°>'~ ~ ~~.'~ ' I~ ~~ has been discharged to the
;n e~meu6,s :s' ~.d under the Class V Shallow
. - ~ ~is notice or proceed with the
-(~c~ '._2 _ .(': >'led copy of EPA-REGION 9
~t~t~i "°~WELLS' The booklet cites
~tctor requirements, example
l¢ff4/lDi ':?§ Drocedures. Be advised that
/
~ I~D lllVOi the EPA Closure Guideline
~ ~ ~ · 8.04.100, the Department
~ " and laboratory service costs
t~ aunt 'OOS£ tu,o~ sa noted. Be advised that
during the abatement of
Coleman Ventures
Subject: Class V Shallow Injection Well
March 31, 1993
Page 2
If we may be of any further assistance, please contact this Department at (805) 861-3636,
Extension 580.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Terry L. Gray
Hazardous Materials Inspector
Hazardous Materials Management Program
TLG:cas
cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
ATTN: Martin Zeleznik
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno
ATTN: Dale Essary
Haddad Dodge
ATI'N: Chuck Haddad
Baler & Hostetler
ATTN: Donald Nanny
~gmy~hadcole.uic
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 FAX'
March 31, 1993
Baler & Hostetler
600 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90017-3212
SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT
4100 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, BAKERSFIELD, CA
Attention: Donald Nanny.
Dear Mr. Nanny:
This letter is an official notice to inform the Chrysler Corporation that the property noted
above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
(KCEHSD) to be the site of a Class V shallow injection well. The well has been identified
as a dry well. This notice is being sent to you because you have been identified as the
attorney representing the Chrysler Corporation, as the lessee of the property listed above.
Pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations 40 (40 CFR), Section 144.12(a), "no owner or
operator shall.., operate [an injection well].., in a manner that allows the movement of
fluid containing any contaminant into underground sources of drinking water, if the presence
of that contaminant may cause a violation of any primary drinking water regulation... Or
may otherwise adversely affect the health of persons."
There is evidence that wastes from the automotive repair shop have been discharged to the
........ .,.~_.~: __,~ ....... .,~ ,~,,,, ,h,, ,,lo,4t:;~r iq nat regulated under the Class V Shallow
"= '! ' - ' notice or proceed with the
~ receive the , ~d copy of EPA-REGION 9
~ ~ s(for. :..:.,-..an-extra, :~ [. WELLS. The booklet cites
~'¢ ~ !" h,x.ry.);ee's Addres~ '': [ct°r requirements' example
u ~. ' A closure guideline booklet.
rm ~ ~ 'te~ i;~r ·
'-.- ~ I 8.04.100, the Department
m~ .' ~' r~ ~, -~~m~ mm ~[ laboratory service costs
='a..~~~ ~<z '.~ oas noted. Be advised that
during the abatement of
L66L eunl' '0088 m~od Scl
Baler & Hostetler
Subject: Class V Shallow Injection Well
March 31, 1993
Page 2
If we may be of any further assistance, please contact this Department at (805) 861-3636,
Extension 582.
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
By: Terry L. Gray
Hazardous Materials Inspector
Hazardous Materials Management Program
TLG:cas
cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
ATI'N: Martin Zeleznik
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno
AT'FN: Dale Essary
Coleman Ventures
ATTN: Gary Grumbles
Haddad Dodge
ATTN: Chuck Haddad
~gray~hadch~.uic
020-120-23-00-8 Roll 1 F2 BE ~G PREPARED 93 STATUS\VA~I'zVE
Area Code 001-028 Name COLEMAN VENTURES Deed 06606-0530 12/12/91
801 cd SD 3 %TAX AFFAIRS 416-16-05
Use 24900 CV 78228 Notf 12000 CHRYSLER DR
KTX HIGHLAND PARK MI 48288
Census Bill 12000 CHRYSLER DR
Coord HIGHLAND PARK MI 48288
Zoning Site 4001 CALIFORNIA AVE .BAKERSFIELD S-CD B
L/S 35 B/TP 29 TR/RG 27 Acres 4.87 CP
SUPPLEMENTAL BILL(S) PRESENT
· ~ VALUES *~ Mineral Land Imprvmnts Other Imps Pers/Prop ExemPtions
Market 540,194 809,337
N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 1349,53]
VALUES CHANGED 08/16/78
z SUPP-INFO · Entry 1 TRA 00t-028 m~m PRIOR -VALUES- NEW ~m~
Name COLEMAN VENTURES Bill No MIN
92-404793-00-6 519,218 LND 519,218
Addr 5251 OFFICE PARK DR ~200 TYPE 777,910 IMP 777,910
BAKERSFIELD CA '93309 DEED- OIM
EVENT-DT TX-YR BILLED-DT ENTRY-DT PPR
12/12/91 91 '08/21/92 06/16/92 EX
1297,128 NAV 1297,128
Enter parcel number 020 120 23 O0 8 File - P EVENT-
24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 KB
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN.
ENVIRONNENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
NEETING/CONFERENCE RECORD
DATE: ,.$/~ ~/~_~ SUBJECT:
TIME: .~,'66~p,~ FILE:
CALL PLACED/RECEIVED BY:
/ir
{. APN :~-__-__-__-__ WO Type
Reimb.:
RP Gode
RESPONSIBLE
PAR~ (RP) N~E: ~D,D~O ho~
RP CONTACT: d~ ~$,D~ a
RP ADDRESS: ?~. 2OX q///~
RP CITY: ~s~/~%~,~f~ STATE: dD ZZP: g3~f +
RP PHONE NOS.: ( ~ ) [~ 5-6a~ ~
( )
~sPECTO.: ~'r~ ~m'/ ~. ~ m
PRO~: ~-Enforceme~
H~P-Pe~itting
DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION: ''~'~ ¢¢/./ C/g//7¢~-4~ ~f -
FACILITY
NAME:
REPORTING PERSON: PHONE NO.
COMMENTS:
KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
UIC SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST 3/93
FACILITY NAME: CHUCK HADDAD DODGE
DATE OF INSPECTION: 03/26/93 TIME: 10:00 AM
INSPECTOR(S): TERRY GRAY
ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS: WES NICKS (KCDEHS), JOE DUNWOODY (AEC)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND ALL OTHERS
(SHOW CREDENTIALS)
B. EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE THERE.
C. (LEGAL INFO)
OWNERS NAME: COLEMAN VENTURES
ADDRESS: 5251 OFFICE PARK DR. SUITE 200
CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA ZIP: 93389
PHONE NUMBER: ~r~ ~~
D. OPERATOR'S NAME: HADDAD DODGE
ADDRESS: 4001 CALIFORNIA AVE.
CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA ZIP: 93309
APN:
PHONE NUMBER: (80§) 398-0264
(SWAP BUSINESS CARDS, ALSO ASK FOR BUSINESS LICENSE)
E.PARENT COMPANY: BAKERSFIELD DODGE INC.
ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 41118
CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA ZIP: 93384
ARE THEY A SUBSIDIARY OF A CORPORATION: NO
ARE THEY INCORPORATED IN THE STATE: DELAWARE
F. CONTACT PERSON: CHUCK HADDAD
PHONE NUMBER: (805) 398-0264
PAGE 1
UIC SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST
II. INTERVIEW THE OPERATOR/NATURE OF BUSINESS
A. HOW LONG IN BUSINESS: 20 YEARS
B. ARE THEY A MEMBER OF AN ASSOCIATION: UNKNOWN
C. ARE THEY AWARE OF ANY WATER SUPPLY WELL LOCATION AND/OR
OWNERSHIP: MUNICIPAL WATER
D. SITE HISTORY
YEARS OF OCCUPATION: 9 YEARS
PREVIOUS OWNERS: UNKNOWN
PREVIOUS OPERATORS: ORTIZ CHRYSLER, URNER CHRYSLER
PREVIOUS USES OF FACILITY: AUTO DEALERSHIP & REPAIR
E. PRODUCTS OR SERVICES OFFERED: AUTO SALES & REPAIR
F. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROCESS, OPERATION, OR
MAINTENANCE THAT PRODUCES WASTE: AUTO MAINT.
G. WHAT CHEMICALS ARE STORED ON SITE: OILS, SOLVENTS, &
ANTIFREEZE.
H. DO THEY HAVE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS: YES
I. DESCRIBE THE WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES: RECYCLING AND
DISPOSAL
J. SOLVENT HAULER: N/A BUSINESS HAS MOVED TO ANOTHER SITE
VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: N/A HOW OFTEN: N/A
K. WASTE OIL HAULER: N/~
VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: N/A HOW OFTEN:
N/A
L. WASTE ANTIFREEZE HAULER: N/A
VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: N/A HOW OFTEN: N/A
M. WASTE SLUDGE HAULER: N/A
VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: N/A HOW OFTEN: N/A
N. OTHER WASTES: N/A
VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: N/A HOW OFTEN: N/A
0. ASK FOR SITE MAPS OF FACILITY AND AS-BUILTS, PLUMBING
PLANS FOR THE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
PAGE 2
UIC SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST
III. INSPECT THE FACILITY
GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
HOUSEKEEPING: GOOD
EASE OF ENTRY: GOOD
COOPERATION: GOOD
SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL
A. GENERAL APPEARANCE OF THE WELL(S): DRY WELL LOCATED
'NEAR REPAIR BAY ADJACENT TO EAST FENCE
B. SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPILLS: YES
C. CLASS V WELL(S): ONE
STATUS: SITE CLOSED
YEARS OF OPERATION: UNKNOWN
D. OIL/WATER SEPARATOR OR GREASE TRAP USED: NO
E. ARE THE WELLS PUMPED OUT: .N/A HOW OFTEN:
F. DO THE WELLS EVER GET PLUGGED UP: UNKNOWN
G. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (MEASURE)
TOTAL DEPTH: DIAMETER: CASING:
H. ARE THE INJECTION WELLS REGULATED BY A STATE OR LOCAL
PROGRAM: RWQCB
I. PERMIT: NO
J. HOW ARE SPILLS OR ACCIDENTS HANDLED: UNKNOWN
K. WHERE DOES THE FLOOR/LOT DRAINAGE WATER GO: DRY WELL
L. CAR WASH: NO
HOW IS THE EFFLUENT DISPOSED:
CLEANERS USED:
M. HOW MANY AUTOS ARE SERVICED DAILY: UNKNOWN
DOCUMENTS TO REQUEST
1 MAP OF FACILITY
2 AS-BUILT DIAGRAMS, PLUMBING PLANS
3 DRILLERS LOGS
4 MONITORING WELL DATA
5 FLOW DIAGRAM OF PROCESSES, WASTE GENERATION, AND DISPOSAL
6 MANIFESTS FOR WASTE DISPOSAL
7 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS
PAGE 3
KERN COUNTY UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
INSPECTION REPORT
AGENCY: KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INSPECTOR: TERRY GRAY
FACILITY INFORMATION
FACILITY NAME: HADDAD DODGE
PARENT COMPANY: BAKERSFIELD DODGE INC.
ADDRESS: 4001 CALIFORNIA AVE.
CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA ZIP: 93309
CONTACT NAME: CHUCK HADDAD POSITION:
DESCRIPTION OF WASTE STREAM: AUTO REPAIR WASTE
DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL: DRYWELL
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY THAT MAY ENDANGER GROUND WATER BUT NOT
RELATED TO INJECTION WELLS OR TANKS (e.g. PONDS, SPILLS):
INSPECTION INFORMATION
INSPECTION DATE: 03/26/93
NUMBER OF WELLS: 1
WELL TYPE
AUTO SERVICE: X INDUSTRIAL WASTE: AGRICULTURAL WASTE:
STORM WATER: X OTHER: ~
STATUS OF WELLS
ACTIVE: X ABANDONED: UNDER CONSTRUCTION: OTHER:
INJECTATE SAMPLED: NO
VIOLATION FOUND: YES
FOLLOW-UP NEEDED: YES
RCRA FACILITY: UNKNOWN
COMMENTS:
~ ~rvice ..quest ~Complaint; CT . ........ Assigned to:_..
Reason for neque~t
_.~ ................................................................... ~ ......................................... ~ ...................
~ & A S SO C I A T E S I hi C
[NGIN{~I:RS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMI~NJAL SPECIAtlST$
215 West Dakota Avenue, · Clovis. California g.3612 * (209) 34~-2200, FAX (20g) ~ 220l
........... :-~ Project No. E92-073
December 18, 1992
Coleman Ventures '~'
Attn: Mr. Gary Grumbles
5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Bakersfield, CA 93389
RE: Letter of Clarification
Limited Environmental Audit
Haddad Dodge
4001 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Grumbles:
As regards to the above-referenced report dated October 23, 1992 we have prepared the following
clarification.
The last sentence of the fourth paragraph of Page 41 reads "additionally, the concentrations of
the metals analyzed from both Boring B-1 and B-2 were below the TI'LC for each metal and none
appeared capable of exceeding the STLC." It should be understood that only TI'LC analysis were
performed and thai the quantitive results of an actual STLC analysis are not known.
· Our comments that "....none appeared caPable of exceeding the STLC," was based upon our past
experience with conditions and properties of a similar nature only, but cannot be guaranteed.
In the event that further investigation of the subject site were pursued, it is not known whether
or not the regulatory authorities would require that additional STLC analysis be performed.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (209) 348-2200 or (800) 800-
071 I.
Sincerely,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kevan Paluso
Project Engineer
KP/lcl
~ & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
215 West Dakota Avenue. · Clovis. Cati~mia 93612' (209) .34~-2200 · FAX (209) 348-7201
October 23, 1992 Project No. E92-073
Coleman Venture
Attn: Mr. Gary Grumbles
5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Bakersfield, California 93389
RE: Limited Environmental Audit
Haddad Dodge
4001 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Grumbles:
In accordance with your authorization, we have completed a Limited Environmental Audit at the
above-referenced project site. The results of our investigation may be found in the attached report.
Included as part of Section 6.0, Discussion of Findings, please note that we have recommended
that a letter be prepared outlining the findings of soil sampling and analysis performed at the subject site.
This letter ~hould be forwarded to both the Kern County Environmental Health Department as well as
the Bakersfield City Fire Departments Hazardous Materials Divisi°n.
If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
our Environmental Division Office at (209) 348-2200 or (800) 800-0711.
Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kevan H. Paluso
Project Geologist
Dean Alexander
Geotechnical Engineer
RGE//002051/RCE #34274
KHP/DA/sf
~, & ASSOCIATES. INC.
ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS AND ENVlI~ONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
Z 15 West Dakota Avenue. · Clovis. California gM31Z ' { 20~) 34~- ? 200 · FAX ( 2001 348- 7 ~.0 I
October 231 1992 Project No. E92-073
Coleman Venture
Attn: Mr. Gary Grumbles
5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 200
Bakersfield, California 93389
RE: Limited Environmental Audit '
Haddad Dodge
4001 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Grumbles:
In accordance with your authorization, we have completed a Limited Environmental Audit at the
above-referenced project site. The results of our investigation may be found in the attached report.
Included as part of Section 6.0, Discussion of Findings, please note that we have recommended
that a letter be prepared outlining the findings of soil sampling and analysis performed at the subject site.
This letter should be forwarded to both the Kern County Environmental Health Department as well as
the. Bakersfield City Fire Departments Hazardous Materials Division.
If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
our Environmental Division Office at (209) 348-2200 or (800) 800-0711.
Respectfully submitted,
It t .o oo o ,
,~xr~,res Se~ 30. ~905 Project G~logist
De~ Alex~der
G~technic~ Engineer
RGE ~2051/RCE ~34274
KHP/DA/sf
LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
VOLUME I OF H
HADDAD DODGE
4001 CALIFORNIA AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Project No. E92-073
October 23, 1992
Prepared for:
Coleman Properties
Attn: Mr. 'Gary Grumbles
5251 Office Park Drive, Suite 20
Bakersfield. California 93389
(805) 326-1141
Prepared by:
Krazan & Associates, Inc.
Environmental Division
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(209) 348-2200
(800) 800-0711
krazan & associates, inc.
engineers, geologists, environmental specialists
Table of Contents
Project No. E92-073
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1
2.0 SITE LOCATION ............................................... 1
3.0 PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................... 1
4.0 INVESTIGATIVE PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY ....................... 3
5.0 FINDINGS OF INVESTIGATION ..................................... 9
6.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................... 3g
7.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................. 46
FIGURES
Vicinity Map ........................................ following page 1
Site Map .......................................... following page 2
PHOTOGRAPHS
Color Photo Nos. 1 and 2 ............................... following page 11
Color Photo Nos. 3 and 4 ............................... following page 12
APPENDICES
On-Site Files Available Information ............................. Appendix A
MSDS Sheets Available On-Site ............................... Appendix B
Agency Files ........................................... Appendix C
Certified Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records .............. Appendix D
Soil Boring Logs .............. · .......................... Appendix E
Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells .................... Appendix F
& ASSOCIATES, INC'.
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
Z 15 West Dakota Avenue. · Clovis. California 0~612 · (ZOOt ]48.2200 · FAX (2. OO) 348-2Z01
October 20, 1992 Project No. E92-073
LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
HADDAD DODGE
4001 CALIFORNIA AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following report summarizes the findings of a limited environmental audit and soil sampling
performed on the Haddad Dodge automobile dealership facility of Bakersfield, California. The
investigation was conducted based upon the request and authorization of Mr. Gary Grumbles of the
Coleman Property Management Corporation.
2.0 SITE LOCATION
The project site is irregular in shape and encompasses approximately 5.4 acres. The subject site
is located at the southeast corner of California Avenue and Chester Lane in northwest Bakersfield,
California.
According to the 1973 United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute Gosford, California
topographic quadrangle maP, the project site is located in the northwestern 1/4 of the northeastern 1/4
of Section 35, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian. Please see
Drawing No. I, Site Location Map.
3.0 PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION
Property primarily comprising the Haddad Dodge auto complex includes five structures and
driveway or parking areas. Structures observed include the new car showroom and administrative
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 2
building, the used care sales office, the minor repair building, the' major repair building, and the paint
and body building.
The new car showroom and administration building occupies a northwest portion of the subject
site. This building is irregular in shape and is primarily a single story structure. This building is Utilized
as a new car showroom, sales offices, administrative offices, customer services check-in and check-out,
and automotive parts sales, distribution and storage area. The parts storage area is the only noted two
story portion of this building.
The used car office occupies a northeast portion of the subject site immediately north of the minor
repair building. This building is a trailer-like rectangular shaped single story structure, elevated several
feet above the surrounding parking area. This building is utilized as sales offices.
Tl~e.~minor repair building*Occupies a northeast portion of the subject site located directly east of
the new car showroom and administration building and immediately south of the used car sales office.
This building is a rectangular shape, east to west oriented, single story structure. This building'
comprised of nine automotive service bays and an office and restrooml The service bay, located furthest~
to the east, is utilized as a vehicle wash bay~'3 There are six automotive service lifts located throughout
this building.
The major repair building~occupies a central eastern portion of the subject site, located
approximately 50 feet south of the minor repair building. This building is a rectangular shaped, east to
west oriented, single story structure. This building is comprised of eleven automotive service bays~
There are fifteen automotive service lifts located throughout this building.
The ~paint and body building O~cupies a southeast portion of the subject site located approximately
50 feet south of the major repair building. This building is a rectangular shaped, east to west oriented,
single story structure. This building is comprised of six automotive'services bay~ and an office and
restroom. The service bay located furthest to the east is utilized as a paint-spray booth, paint product
storage room, and vehicle wash bay or preparation area. The paint-spray booth is a self-contained free
standing structure built within the paint and body building. There is one automotive service lift located
in this building.
Within the central portion of the paved parking area between the minor and major repairing
/
buildings is a single fuel dispenser, stand pipes and dispenser island associated with a.:10~00Og~i~ng
underground. ~'~i: St6rage_.t~::~ A 500.1gall0n,uiidi~rgr~u'ndl ~aste :6iL'tanl~ and 500~al!0n~pd~e~.rg~ound~
solgefit tank~are located south and southeast of the dispenser and I0,000 gallon tank. The fill inlet to.the
fuel tank was observed to be unlocked.: The~.fill~iiil~/~?f6~.:.~t~f~:500~iillb=/i~t~~:~ld~
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 3
Paved areas between buildings are primarily used for the parking of new vehicles or those
awaiting service. An area south of the western most portions of the major repair building included a
large concrete slab and two service lifts.
Adjoining the south wall of the southeast most portion of the major repair building was observed
a small chain-link fenced and covered storage area. This area appeared to be utilized for the storage of
unused equipment or supplies.
A chain-link fence extends along the eastern perimeter of the subject property. A concrete block
wall extends along the southwestern and southern perimeter of the subject property.
The subject site is bordered to the north by concrete sidewalk curb and gutter and California
Avenue. The subject site is bordered to the east by a Marie Callender Restaurant, parking area and
vacant land. The subject site is bordered to the west, southwest, and south by concrete sidewalk, curb
and gutter and Chester Lane. Please see Drawing No. 2, Site Map.
4.0 INVESTIGATIVE PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY
The purpose of our Limited Environmental Audit was to evaluate hazardous materials
management from the resources made available from on-site or regulatory sources or observations made
at the time of our audit. This investigation does not include an assessment of employee training or
community notification procedures that may be applicable to the researched businesses under current State
or Federal guidelines. The following are methods by which necessary specific information was obtained
during the course of this investigation.
4.1 Site Reconnaissance
The subject site was inspected. During the inspection an examination of subject property .and
business operations was conducted.
Service and storage areas of the facility were examined and product storage or utilization noted.
Comments regarding inappropriate practices or procedures, including record keeping, container handling,
container labeling, etc., were included as a result of our reconnaissance.
4.2 Review of On-Site Files
Business operators or .managers were notified in writing prior to our initial inspection date and.
asked to make available information regarding inventory, facility/system operations, Materials Safety Data
Sheets (MSDS), and Business Plan (BP) documents, product inventory, hazardous materials/ waste
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 4
handling and disposal practices. Ail available information was reviewed and when possible, copies made.
Applicable information is summarized in this report.
4._~3 Agency Record Search
Our research included information requested of several local agencies regarding permitting or
other information indicating materials and hazardous materials storage or utilization at the subject business
or property. Local agencies from which information was requested include:
The City of Bakersfield Public Works Development Services Department.
The City of Bakersfield Wastewater Treatment Department.
The Kern County Environmental Health Department (EHD).
The City of Bakersfield Fire Departments Hazardous Materials Division (FD).
The Kern County Office of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD).
4.4 Reuulatory Compliance/Hazardous Materials Storage - The Waters Bill (AB 2185)
4.4.1 Background Information
The Waters Bill requires local governments to regulate storage of hazardous' materials by
businesses, and to plan for emergency response to releases of hazardous materials. The Waters Bill was
initially adopted in 1985 to take effect in 1986, and has been amended a number of times since.
Each county was required to designate an "administering agency", and each city was given until
September 2, 1986, to opt to implement the Waters Bill within its boundaries, in cooperation with its
county.
In 1990, the law was amended to formalize the authority of counties and cities to designate local
fire districts to act as their administering agencies (SP 2263, Torres); this has already been the practice
in a number of areas within he .city limits of the City of Bakersfield, California. The City of Bakersfield
Fire Department's Hazardous Materials Division has been designated as the administering agency for
businesses and properties within the Bakersfield City limits.
4.4.2 Business Plans
Any business handling hazardous materials or wastes above State threshold quantities must submit
a Business Plan (BP) to its local administering agency. A separate plan is required for each "facility, site
or branch" of a business that handles any regulated material above threshold quantities.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
· ~ Project No. E92-073
Page No. 5
4.4.3 Reporting Thresholds
AB 2185 established a consistent set of reporting thresholds for any ,"hazardous material," the
definition of which includes hazardous wastes. These reporting thresholds are 55 gallons of a liquid, 500
pounds of a solid, or 200 cubic feet of a compressed gas (measured at standard temperature and
pressure). The Waters Bill provides a general exemption for hazardous materials stored as consumer
sized packages for direct distribution to the general public (e.g., small containers of paint thinner).
One of the 1988 amendments to the Waters Bill (AB 2189, Waters) complicates this ·simple
threshold standard by creating a second, parallel set of reporting thresholds for certain materials as part
of the State's efforts to improve coordination among the Waters Bill, La Follette Bill, and SARA Tide
III.
4.4.4 Business Plan Reporting Requirements
Business plans must contain detailed Hazardous Materials Inventory Forms (HMIF). With the
addition of ali amended requirements effective January 1, 1989, these forms must include at least the
following information:
· owner/operator name;
· name, telephone number and address of the business;
· standard industrial classification (SIC) code number of the business;
Dun and Bradstreet number of the business;
· chemical and common name and chemical abstract service (CAS) number of every
hazardous material and hazardous waste handled above threshold quantities;
· listing of the chemical and common name of other hazardous materials or mixtures on-
site, including any chemicals stored in quantities greater than 10,000 pounds for which
a MSDS is required;
· physical state (pure, mix, solid, liquid, gas) of each material;
· storage pressure and temperature of every hazardous material;
· designation of each material's physical and health hazard categories; fire, sudden release
of pressure, reactivity,.immediate health hazard (acute), delayed health hazard (chronic);
· average daily amount of each material found on-site;
· maximum amount of each material on-site at any one time;
· total annual production of each hazardous waste;
· on-site location of ea~:h material (typically a site map);
· indication if trade secrets are claimed;
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 6
· on-site emergency response and training plans;
· 24-hour emergency response contacts.
Another 1988 amendment (AB924, Tanner) adds a requirement that any regulated business which
rents or leases its location must notify the property owner that Waters Bill requirements 'apply. If
requested by the owner, the renter/tenant must provide' a copy of its BP within five days. This
amendment took effect on February 18, 1988.
Business plans are to be filed and left open to public inspection at the administering agency's
offices. Both trade secret protection and confidentiality of site plans are available.
4.4.5 Administrative and Enforcement Provisions
lurisdictions are authorized to establish fee schedules to recover the costs of administering a
program. The Waters Bill creates civil and criminal penalties for business noncompliance. Civil
penalties in the amount of $2,000 per day for any violation plus any actual cleanup costs, and $5,000 per
day of any "knowing" violation have been set. Failure to report an actual or threatened release is
punishable by up to $25,000 for each day the violation occurred and/or up to one year in county jail.
In 1990, the law was amended to authorize administering agencies to levy these civil rout not criminal)
penalties directly by administrative action, without having to sue in court (SB 2263, Torres).
SB 2263 also requires administering agencies to inspect facilities at least once every three years
to ensure Waters Bill compliance.
Our research included a 'detailed literature search and examination of all site/business specific
records maintained and made available for review by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department's (FD)
Hazardous Materials Division regarding material storage or utilization at the subject businesses or
properties, as well as information maintained on file and/or made available by business owner/operators
as required for applicable businesses under the aforementioned BP requirements.
4.4.6 Legislation/Enforcement Authority: The Health and Safety Code and California Code of
Regulations
One of the more comprehensive compilations of codes established to address the health of the
environment and public is the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, first established in 1939.
Topics addressed within the Health and Safety Code include (but not limited to) hazardous waste control,
state regulation of. existing hazardous waste facilities, coordination with Federal Acts, and State
Regulations of existing hazardous wasie facilities. Furthermore, a second compilation of codes, laws and
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 7
regulations established to address the health of the environment and public that itself references the Health
and Safety Code is Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.
As such, both the Health and Safety Code as well as Title 22 of the California Code of
Regulations were reviewed to assess the applicability of specific sections to activities at the subject site.
An effort was made to reveal the precise section referenced, to paraphrase the code, and indicate whether
or not observations of the subject site or on-site activities suggest a compliance or noncompliance status.
4.__~5 Limited Soil Samvlinu and Analysis
~i~cf~ii~i~'iiiil{Z~igravity:injecti0n well (or dry,well~;to remove rain water from a paved area
located between the minor and major repair buildings. The dry well is located approximately one foot
west of the chain-link fence defining the eastern perimeter to the subject property and approximately
sixteen feet north of the major repair building. Conversations with representatives of Haddad Dodge
indicate that the dry well may be two feet in diameter and extend to a depth of approximately 30 feet
below grade. Two borings (B-I and B-2) were advanced immediately north andsouth of the dry weft
and terminated at 35 feet below grade utilizing a truck-mounted drill rig;~..
A third boring advanced by means of a truck-mounted drill rig (B-3) was advanced at a location
near the rear of the subject property. A single soil sample was obtained for the purposes of obtaining
background metal samples which could be utilized to cross check or compare the results of analysis from
Boring Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5. It is assumed that the sample obtained and the constituents contained
represent naturally occurring background concentrations
Thi~ facility utilizes silt/sand traps located beneath the concrete slab within two wash bays one
each located in the eastern most service bays of the minor and major repair buildings. Hand-augured
borings (B-4 and B-5) were advanced immediately adjacent to each of the sand/silt traps to depths.
approximately corresponding to immediately below each trap's bottom surface.
During the drilling process soils were examined for visual evidence of hydrocarbon
contamination. Additionally, soils were field screened with a portable photoionization detector (PID).
The PID readings were used to aid in choosing samples for chemical analysis and were noted on the logs
of borings. Soil samples were obtained for logging purposes in Boring Nos. I and 2 at five foot intervals
and change in lithology, beginning at 10 feet below grade. Soils were logged in accordance with the
Unified Soil Classification System. Based on field observations as to the presence or absence of
hydrocarbons, selected soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis in an attempt to further
characterize the conditions present at the subject site.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 8
4.~ Additional Research; Regulatory Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells
Guidelines indicating required steps or procedures to appropriately perform the closure of shallow
disposal or injectionweils were researched. Steps or procedures were reviewed, summarized and detailed
in this report.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1974, as amended, requires the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a program which provides for the safety of the
nation's drinking water. The Underground Injection Control (UIC) program was established under the
SDWA to prevent contamination of underground sources of drinking water from improper use of disposal
wells.
Disposal wells covered by the UIC Program include bored, driven, or drilled shafts or dug holes
whose depth is greater than the largest surface dimension, where the prin6ipal function of the shaft or
hole is the emplacement of fluids. Under certain conditions, sumps, septic tanks, cesspools and drain
fields may also be called disposal wells. For the purposes of the UIC Program, a fluid is any material
or substance which flows or moves, whether in a semisolid, liquid, sludge, gas or any other form or
state. Contaminants introduced into underground sources of drinking water through the use of disposal
wells include bacteria and virus, minerals and nitrates, heavy metals, organic chemicals and pesticides.
Most types of disposal wells are subject to construction, performance and monitoring
requirements designed to ensure that no contamination of underground sources of drinking water occurs
through their use. Wells that discharge fluids into or above an underground source of drinking water are
generally classified as shallow disposal wells and are not always subject to these requirements. The
disposal of hazardous fluids into shallow wells is prohibited Under SDWA. However, many shallow wells
accept fluids that are not defined as hazardous, but still have a potential to contaminate underground
sources of drinking water. EPA Region IX has requested closure of such wells. The EHD is the
implementing agency for the investigation and closure of these wells in Kern County, California.
The EPA and the EHD have adopted very specific guidelines and procedures designed to outline
the appropriate closure of shallow disposal, dry or injection wells. GUidelines and procedures are
thoroughly outlined in the document "Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells, 1992" available
by both agencies. A thorough review of this document was made, a summary of information presented
in this report and a copy of the document supplied in an appendix of this report.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 9
5.0 FINDINGS OF INVK,VriGATION
5,1 Site Reeonnais~anc~
At the time of our on-site reconnaissance, Haddad Dodge was an active automotive sales and
service facility.
Activities at the subject site require that amounts of automotive type fluids be stored, transferred
or sold as part of automotive maintenance. New or unused liquids of significant quantities observed at
the subject site include motor oils, transmission fluids, antifreeze, gasoline or diesel fuel, paints, and parts
washing solvent. Please reference the following table for a description of observed new/unused liquids
and approXimate quantities.
Product Name Quantity
Pennzoil Gear Lube SAE 80W90 7-20 gallon drums
Pennzoil Multi-Purpose White Grease 1-20 gallon drum
Pennzoil Automotive Undercoating 1-20 gallon drum
Recycled Antifreeze 2-55 gallon drums
Mineral `spirits Parts 'Cleaner 1-55 gallon drum
Pennzoil Wheel Bearing Grease 1-5 gallon plastic bucket
New Motor Oil, SAE 30 4-10 gallon AGST
New Motor Oil, 10W 30 1-85 gallon AGST
New Dextron II, ATF 3-110 gallon AG.ST
New Motor Oil, 20W 50 1-85 gallon AGST
Chem-Dip Carburetor and Parts Cleaner I0-5 gallon metal can
Chevron DF-I Diesel Fuel 2-55 gallon drums
Zepp Dyna-Blue Degreasing `solution 4-55 gallon drums
Clean Power Non Caustic Concrete Cleaner 1-5 gallon plastic bucket
`sunshine Car Wash Soap 1-5 gallon plastic bucket
Diesel Fuel in Red Filler Container 1-5 gallon plastic bucket
Mopar Immersion Cleaner 1-5 gallon metal can
ASGT = Above Ground `storage Tank
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 10
Waste liquids observed at the subject site included motor oils, antifreeze, paints, and parts
washing solvent. Please reference the following table for a description of Observed waste liquids and
approximate quantities.
Product Name Quantity
Waste Oil Filters 5-55 gallon drums
1-20 gallon drum
Waste Motor Oil 2-250 gallon AGST
2-20 gallon drum
8-20 gallon wheeled drip collector
4-5 gallon plastic buckets
1-55 gallon drum
Waste Gear or Lube 2-5 gallon drums
Waste Antifreeze 2-55 gallon drums
Zepp Dina-Clean Parts Washing and Degreasing 4 - 22 gallon reservoirs
AGST = Above Ground Storage Tank
Upon examination, none of the above mentioned waste containers displayed appropriate labels
as mandated by both Chapter 6.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Division 4.5 of Title 22,
California Code of Regulations. Appropriate waste container labels will be further discussed in section
5.4 of this report.
New or unused gases observed at the subject site included oxygen, acetylene, and freon. Please
reference the following table for a description of observed new gases and approximate quantities.
Product Approximate Quantity Observed
Pressurized Oxygen Gas I approximately 200 cubic foot cylinder
Pressurized Acetylene Gas I approximately 150 cubic foot cylinder
Freon - 12 Approximately 384-12 ounce cans
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073-
Page No. 11
The eastern most service bays, or portions thereof, within both the minor repair building and the
paint and body building were designed for use as wash bays. The wash bay located within the minor
repair building encompasses the entire bay, includes a floorslab sloping toward its center and drain inlet
and service covers. The silt/sand trap was located beneath the covers. A large 4'x 3'x 5' tall parts
washing tank was located in the bays northernmost corner. At the time of our reconnaissance the parts
washing tank was disconnected and was indicated as unused by employees. A 55 gallon drum of diesel
fuel and a square metal aboveground tank of unknown content were located along the wash bay'.s north
wall. An unlabeled partially full black plastic 55 gallon drum of unknown content was located in the
wash bay's northwest corner. A diesel fueled steam-cleaner with attached water softening unit was
located along the wash bay's east wall. The concrete floor slab aPpeared in good condition. No obvious
signs _of floor slab cracking was observed. Both the drain inlet cover and a manhole service cover were
removed and the silt/sand trap system observed. Approximate dimensions of the silt/sand trap vault were
made by probing the inside dimensions with a metal bar.' Approximate silt/sand trap dimensions are: 8
feet in length, and 4 to 5 feet in width with a flat bottom surface. The silt/sand trap appeared to be
divided into two sections separated by a concrete partition. One below the inlet cover and one below the
service cover. The section beneath the inlet cover primarily contained a dark gray liquid with silts, sands
and amounts of a thick black sludge. The section beneath the service cover primarily contained a thick
dark gray sludge with little or no free liquid.' Upon removing both covers the silt/sand trap emitted a
odz '
The wash bay located within the paint and body building encompasses the western one-half of the
overall bay, includes a floor slab sloping toward its center and drain inlet and service covers. The
silt/sand trap is located beneath the covers. Both the drain inlet cover and service cover were removed
and the silt/sand trap system observed. The sections beneath both the.inlet cover and the service cover~
contained a dark gray liquid. No obvious signs of silts, sands or sludges were observed. Upon removing
both covers, the silt/sand trap emitted a moderate, undefined odor. A hazardous materials storage locker
is located along the east wall of the wash bay. An unlabeled 55 gallon drum of paint product waste
materials and a waste material reclamation tank are located within a northeast portion of the wash bay
and north of the storage room. The concrete floor slab appeared in good condition. No obvious sigm
of cracking was observed. The approximate dimensions of the silt/sand trap were made and found to be
consistent with those of the previously inspected system. Approximate silt/sand trap dimensions are: 8
feet in length, 4 to 5 five feet in diameter with a flat bottom surface, and divided into two sectiom. Soils
beneath both silt/sand traps were subsequently sampled and analyzed. Please see Section 5.5 for results
of the analysis.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Photo 1: Dry well with steel grate, above ground waste oil storage rank'and drum storage area
located immediately north of the northeast most comer of the Major Repair Building. Note slope
of grond from the tank/drum area towards dry well.
Photo 2: Wash bay at eastern most Minor Repair Building. Sill/sand trap Inlet in center of bay.
Bakersfield,
California
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 12
Installed and utilized primarily throughout the minor repair, major repair and paint and body
building are approximately 25 aUtomotive type hydraulic lifts. A shallow service vault covered with steel
plates was commonly associated with each lift. Examination of the condition of the vaults interiors
consistently revealed discolored or stained sidewalls and bottoms with occasional signs of a dark residue
along the bottom.
Waste motor oil generated during the service of automobiles was observed to be collected by
portable 20 gallon drain tanks and temporarily stored in :5 or 20 gallon containers without lids near many
of the service bays. Waste oils would be ultimately transferred to one of two 250 gallon above ground
storage tanks or 55 gallon containers. One above ground tank was located along the western most wall
of the minor repair building and the second above ground tank was located along the eastern property line
immediately north of the major repair bUilding.
The area adjacent to the location of the second above ground waste oil storage tank immediately
north of the major repair building, west of the property line and south of a.dry well inlet is also utilized
for the temporary storage of 20 and 55 gallon drums. Seven drums were observed in this area at the time
of our reconnaissance one were noted to be either empty or utilized for the storage of waste oils and/or
oil filters with and without lids. Concrete and asphalt surfaces beneath the above ground tank and drums
displayed signs of minor surface staining.
A paint booth is located in the eastern most portion of the paint and body building between the
.wash bay and the end of the building. The paint booth is primarily a free standing unit, measuring
approximately 14 feet in width and 22 feet in length. The concrete flooring within the paint booth gently
slopes toward its center where a single small floor drain is located. A small concrete block wall storage
room is located immediately west of the paint booth. The storage room is primarily used for the storage
of new and used paint products. Please reference the following table for a description of observed new
and used paint products and approximate quantities contained within the storage room.
Product Name Quantity
New Deltron PPG Paint Products --30-1 gallon metal cans
New PPG Reducer = 12-I gallon metal cans
New NCT Clear Coat =6-1 gallon metal cans
New PPG Paint Products ~20-1 gallon metal cans
New PPG Paint Products --25-1 pint metal cans
Acrylic, Clear Coat, or Thinners -.-60-I quart metal cans
Waste Paint Products 3-55 gallon drums
-- = Approximately
KRAZAN & AssOCIATES, INC.
Photo 3: Wash bay and paint prep. area of eastem most Paint and Body Building. Silt/sand trap
inlet beneath white van. Note paint storage room beyond employee with white shid.
Photo 4: Discarded paint pile. Note brown floor stain from previous spill.
;
].. I': ¢i azan
Haddad ~2~0710-12-92
Bakers leld,
C a I I f o r n I a ENGINEERS * GEOLOGISTS · ENVIRONMENTALSPEClAU$'r$
Project No~ E92-073
Page No. 13
The western 3/4 of the paint and body building are separated from the paint booth and wash bay
segment by a concrete block wall. Observed at. the southeastern most corner of the western 3/4 of the
paint and body building was a pile of discarded used or waste paint products. The paint products
observed were stored in one pint to one gallon metal cans. The cans were randomly placed in cardboard
boxes Or upon each other. Discoloration of the flooring adjacent to the discarded Cans suggest that
leaking may have occurred in the past. Please reference the following table for a description of observed
discarded paint products and approximate quantities.
Product Name Quantity
Discarded or Waste Paint Products -- 65 - I gfllon metal cans
-- Approximately
Observed in a central portion of the paint and body building were two, approximately 30 gallon
size, gasoline tanks. Both tanks appeared to be portable with wheels and a pull handle. Both tanks
utilized a hand pump mounted in their top to dispense fluids. One tank (painted red) had the letters MS
indicating the contents are gasoline. A second tank (painted yellow) did not display any contents
placarding.
Housed within the sales and administration building of the auto complex is a parts sales
distribution and storage area. A thorough reconnaissance of the storage area was performed and the type
and approximate quantities of materials on hand at the time of a reconnaissance noted. Please reference
the following table for a description of observed products and approximate quantities stored within the
parts storage area.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ProjeCt No. E92-073
Page No. 15
Extend Radiator Flush by Wins 12-I 1 ounce bottles
Mopar Antifoaming Fluid. Additive 12-1/2 fluid ounce bottles
National Refrigerant RI2 32 cases, 12-12 ounce cans each
Mopar Power Steering Fluid 12-16 ounce bottles
Mopar Brake Fluid 24-12 ounce bottles
Highpoid Gear Lubricant 24-24 ounce bottles
Kent Battery Terminal Cleaner 10-15 ounce spray cans
Brake Silencer for Shoes and Brakes 2-8 ounce bottles
Kent Brake Silencer 3-8 ounce bottles
Kent Leak Tracing Powder 2-8 ounce spray cans
Permatex Aviation Form-A-Gasket 1-4 ounce bottle
Kent Special Release Agent 2-10.5 ounce spray cans
Kent Battery Sealer 6-13 ounce spray cans
NOCO NTP-2 Battery Corrosion Preventive Spray 1-12.75 ounce spray can
Propane Fuel 1-14.1 compressed gas cylinder
Kent Gasket and Carbon Stripper 1-15 ounce spray can
Throughout service and storage areas of the automotive complex were observed numerous
unlabeled storage containers. The unlabeled containers ranged in size from 5-gallon buckets to metal
above ground storage tanks. Please reference the folloWing table for a description of observed unlabeled
containers and approximate quantities.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 14
Product Name Quantity
Berryman BR Chem Tool Carburetor and Choke Cleaner 24-5.2 ounce cans
Mock Fuel Injector Flush 13-9 ounce cans
Berryman Brake Cleaner Non-Chloride 8-15 ounce cans
Mopar Power Steering Fluid 11-32 ounce bottles
Mopar ATF Type 7176 3-32 ounce bottles
Mopar Dextron 2 Mercon ATF 1-32 ounce bottle
Mopar Spray Paint 24-five ounce spray cans
Mopar/Chrysler Motors Genuine Parts Antifreeze 44-one gallon bottles
UN 1956 - "Flammable Gas' 2 ~- .5 ~
Phoenix Specialty Gas
Mopar Refrigeration System Compressor Lube 2-32 ounce bottles
Mopar Spray Gasket Sealant 11-12 ounce spray cans
Mopar Vinyl Protector 2-8 ounce bottles
Mopar Glass Cleaner 5-15 ounce spray cans
Mopar Fuel De-icer and Carburetor Cleaner 2-15 ounce spray cans
Mopar Maintenance K-101 Cement 2-16 ounce containers
Mopar Auto Glass Adhesive and Sealer 18q6 ounce containers
Mopar High Performance Gear Additive 3-4 ounce cOntainers
Mopar Multipurpose Grease 7-14.5 ounce tubes
Mopar Spray White Lube 3-13 ounce spray cans
Pipe Thread Sealer 1-1 pint container
Mopar Performance Engine Enamel 4-13 ounce spray cans
BG Supercharge Gas Additive 1-6 ounce container
Auto Care Fuel Injector Cleaner 1-15 ounce can
Circon Auto Air-Conditioner Leak Stop 14 ounce can
WD40 10-12 ounce spray cans
BG Fuel Injection System Cleaner 5-12 ounce containers
Circon Refrigerant 12 and Air-Conditioner Leak Finder 15-12 ounce cans
Chrylon Spray Paint 7-11 ounce spray cans
Circon Air-Conditioning Leak Stop 2-4 ounce cans
BG Supercharged Deposit Control for Gasoline Engines 25-12 ounce cans
BG MOA Premiere Engine Protection 15-11 ounce cans
BG Fridge Lubrication for Air-Conditioning Systems 14-4 ounce cans
BG Automatic Transmission Conditioner 10-I 1 ounce cans
BG Radiator Conditioner 17-12 ounce cans
BG Radiator Flush 10-12 ounce cans
Mopar Auto Lead Acid Batteries 21 batteries
Mopar Interior Vinyl Total Clean 7-13 ounce cans
Master Shield Fabric Protector 8-16 ounce cans
Master Shield Paint Sealant 15-4 ounce bottles
Mopar Hand Cleaner 24-16 ounce bottles
Mopar Rust Penetrant 4-10.8 ounce spray cans
Mopar Fuel System Cleaner . 12 spray cans
Netamox Blue Corrosive Capture 4-11 ounce bottles
Protazyne Yellow Corrosive Capture 2-11 ounce bottles
Windshield Washer Solvent Concentrated Solution 10-16 ounce bottles
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 16
P'roduct Name Quantity
Pennzoil Type Drum Unlabeled 1-20 gallon drum
Gasoline l-portable 30 gallon red metal container marked
gasoline
l-portable 30 gallon yellow metal container unmarked
Unlabeled Containers 1-5 gallon plastic bucket, looks like new grease
12-20 gallon Pennzoil type drum used as waste can
I --. 120 gallon AGST w/hand pump, appears empty
1-55 gallon red metal drum connected to distribution
line
1-55 gallon red metal drum with hand pump, appears
empty
1-55 gallon black metal drum with hand pump
1-55 gallon metal drum
1-55 gallon red metal drum
3-square metal AGST, dimensions unknown
( < 200 gal each)
l-Pennzoil type drum
3-55 gallon metal drums
1-30 gallon plastic drum appears to be used for waste
1-55 gallon black plastic drum
6-55 gallon blue metal drums
AGST = Above Ground Storage Tank
5.2 Review of On-Site Files
A single Organized file or source of information was not available at the subject site. No single
Haddad Dodge representative appeared to, when questioned, be fully aware of the whereabouts of.
organized files or information usually maintained by the operator of similar facilities. A source of
information was found to be two red binders maintained by the administrative offices within which
random information was placed. These binders were not organized nor was there a discernable filing
system. A second limited source of information was found to be the service or supplier files maintained
by the administrative offices of the ~Iaddad's Mitsubishi Auto Center located at 3000 Harris Road,
Bakersfield, California.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 17
Review of the aforementioned limited sources of information revealed 22 documents or portions
thereof, that contained information Providing an insight into activities at the subject site. Please see
Appendix A for copies of all reference documents. The following is an itemization of reference
documents including a short summary of inl~ormation obtained.
Item 1: (one page)
Description or Title: Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest No.
90864009, dated 7-24-92 indicates that one 55 gallon drum of a "Waste
Paint Retailed Material" was shipped off-site.
Item 2: (one page)
Description or Title: Chem Waste Management, Inc. dispatch/shipping
instructions. References Item I. However, this item indicates that three
drums were picked up.
Item 3: (one page)
Description or Title: Chem Waste Management, Inc. invoice.
References Item I. However, this item indicates that three 55 gallon
drums were picked up.
Item 4: (two pages)
Description~or Title: Paint/Solvent Table. Itemizes usage quantities of
paint products during 1990.
Item 5: (one page)
Description or Title: Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest No.
89467634, dated 12-26-90 indicates that 150 gallons of a "Waste Paint
Related Material" was shipped off-site.
Item 6: (one page)
Description or Title: California Land Disposal Restriction Notice and
Certification dated December 26, 1990. Refers to Item 5. Indicates that
Haddad Dodge is the generator of waste that must be treated to meet
treatment standards prior to land disposal.
Item 7: (one page)
Description or Title: Land Disposal Notification and Certification Form
dated December 16, 1990. Refers to Item 5. Indicates that Haddad
Dodge is the generator of a restricted waste that must be treated to meet
treatment standards prior to land disposal.
Item 8: (three pages)
Description or Title: Chemical Waste Management, Inc. service
agreement dated 10-24-90. A service agreement between Haddad Dodge
and Chemical Waste .Management, Inc. for the disposal of Waste Paint
Related materials.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 18
Item 9: (two pages)
Description or Title: FD Underground Tank Questionnaire (not dated)
Indicates that at the time the questionnaire was prepared the three
underground storage tanks located on-site were out-of-service.
Item 10: (five pages)
Description or Title: EPA inventory of injection wells. An EPA cover
letter, questionnaire, and definitions page. The completed questionnaire
(dated 6-26-88) indicates that the Haddad facility does not have or utilize
any type of injection well. However, one injection (dry) well is located
on the subject property immediately north of the major repair building
and west of the property line..
Item 11: (one page)
Description or Title: Form 2A of the FD BP (not dated). A portion of
the FD's required BP.
Item 12: (l page)
Description or Title: FD inspector's checklist (not dated). Indicates
that, at the time of the inspection, Haddad Dodge or information
available were inadequate in respects to two items: 1) verification of Haz
Mat training, and 2) antifreeze and transmission fluids needed to be
added to the Haz Mat inventory.
Item 13:(1 page)
Description or Title: A FD Haz Mat Inventory Form dated 6-20-90.
This information indicates that antifreeze would be stored on-site in
plastic containers and in a maximum amount of 70 gallons. Likewise,
automotive transmission fluid would be stored on-site in metal containers
and in a maximum amount of 90 gallons.
Item 14: (three pages)
Description or Title: A FD Haz Mat Inventory Form dated 1-26-89.
This information indicates that the following material with respective
containers types and quantities would be stored on-site.
Product Storage Container Max. Amount Stored
Gasoline Underground Tank 2,000 - 4,000 gallons
Motor Oil Drums 225 gallons
Solvent Aboveground .Tank 0 - 55 gallons
Waste Oil Aboveground Tank 0 - 250 gallons
Paint Thinner Metal Container (not drum) 5 gallons
Item 15: (one page)
Description or Title:" A FD Hazardous Materials Inventory Form dated
1-29-89. This information indicates that the following material with
respective container types and quantities would be stored on-site.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 19
Product Storage Container Maximum Amount Stored
Solvent Aboveground Tank 0 - 55 gallons
Motor Oil Aboveground Tank 320 gallons
Waste Motor Oil Aboveground Tank 0 - 250 gallons
Item 16: (one page)
Description or Title: Invoice and copy of check for annual fee for
permit to operate three underground tanks dated 4-30-86.
Item 17:(18 pages)
Description or Title: Air Pollution Control District's Air Toxics
Inventory Plan: instructions and forms dated 7-30-91. Review of these
documents reveals the following information.
· this facility utilizes two above ground tanks (waste oil).
· this facility utilizes cold cleaner type degreasers with
lids.
· the degreasers are permitted - permit No. CAD982487429
· the type of solvent used is stoddard solvent in a 360 gallon/year quantity.
· the chemical name of the solvent is "Hydrocarbon Solvent~.
· that the disposal/recycling company that the solvent is
sent to is Safety Kleen.
· that the solvent contains the Listed Toxic Substances C9-C13 Hydrocarbon.
Item 18: (one page)
Description or Title: Form 2A of the FD BP (not dated). A portion of
the fire departments required BP. This information indicates that two
above ground tanks and one underground gasoline tank are monitored
daily.
Item 19: (six pages)
Description or Title: Bio-Cycle, Inc., (recycler) invoice dated 1-30-92.
Itemizes the pick up, recycle, disposal or sale of drums, glycol
antifreeze, and oil fitters.
Item 20: (one page)
Description or Title: A Safety Kleen Corp. Service Contract dated
6-26-91. This information indicates that four parts cleaner units would
be serviced on an eight week interval for one year.
Item 21: (one page)
Description or Title: Service Invoice and Waste Manifest dated 2-5-92:
Information contained within this document indicates that seven parts
cleaning stations were serviced and that 424 lbs.. of waste petroleum
naphtha, combustibl~ liquids was transported to the Safety - Kleen
Corporation facility in Fresno, California.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
· ~ ~1 Project No. E92-073
Page No. 20
Item 22: (one page)
Desexiption or Title: Service Invoice and Waste Manifest. Information
contained within this document indicates that six parts cleaning stations
were serviced and that 293 lbs. of waste petroleum naphtha, combustible
liquid was transported off-site to the Safety - Kleen Corporation facility
in Fresno, California.
Review of the aforementioned limited sources of information revealed approximately 237 MSDS
sheets for products that may have been used, are used or have been proposed for use at the subject site.
When available MSDS sheets were cross-checked against those products observed to be utilized or stored
on-site, approximately 49 products were noted for which MSDS sheets were not available. Please see
the following listing of products for which MSDS sheets were not available.
Product Name Approximate Quantity Observed
Berryman BR Chem tool Carburetor and Choke Cleaner 24-5.2 ounce cans
Mock Fuel Injector Flush 13-9 ounce cans
Berryman Brake Cleaner Non-Chloride 8-15 ounce cans
Mopar Dextron 2 Mercon ATF 1-32 ounce bottle
Mopar Glass Cleaner 5-15 ounce spray cans
Mopar Maintenance K-101 Cement 2-16 ounce containers
Mopar Auto Glass Adhesive and Sealer 18-16 ounce containers
Mopar High Performance Gear Additive 3-4 ounce containers
Mopar Multipurpose Grease 7-14.5 ounce tubes
Pipe Thread Sealer 1-1 pint container
BG Supercharge Gas Additive 1-6 ounce container
Auto Care Fuel Injector Cleaner 1-15 ounce can
Circon Auto Air-Conditioner Leak Stop 1-4 ounce can
WD40 10-12 ounce spray cans
BG Fuel Injection System Cleaner 5-12 ounce containers
Circon Refrigerant 12 and Air-Conditioner Leak Finder 15-12 ounce cans
Chrylon Spray Paint 7-11 ounce spray cans
Circon Air-Conditioning Leak Stop 2-4 ounce cans
BG Supercharged Deposit Control for Gasoline Engines 25-12 ounce cans
BG MOA Premiere Engine Protection 15-11 ounce cans
BG Frige Lubrication for Air-Conditioning Systems 14-4 ounce cans
BG Automatic Transmission Conditioner 10-11 ounce cans
BG Radiator Conditioner 17-12 ounce cans
BG Radiator Flush 10-12 ounce cans
Mopar Fuel System Cleaner 12 spray cans
Netamox Blue Corrosive Capture : 4-11 ounce bottles
Protazyne Yellow Corrosive Capture 2-11 ounce bottles
Windshield Washer Solvent Concentrated Solution 10-16 ounce bottles
KRAZAN & .ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 21
Extend RadiatOr Flush by Wins 12-11 ounce bottles
National Refrigerant RI2 432 cases, 12-12 ounce cans
Kent leak Tracing Powder 2-8 ounce spray cans
Permatex Aviation Form-A-Gasket 1-4 ounce bottle
Kent Special Release Agent 2-19.5 ounce spray cans
NOCO NTP-2 Battery CorrOsion Preventive Spray 1-12.75 Ounce spray cans
Propane Fuel 1-14.1 lb. compressed gas cylinder
Kent Gasket and Carbon Stripper 1-15 ounce spray can
Pennzoil Gear Lube SAE 80W90 7-20 gallon drums
Pennzoil Multi-Purpose White Grease 1-20 gallon drum
Pennzoil Automotive Undercoating 1-20 gallon drum
Recycled Antifreeze 2-55 gallon drums
Mineral Spirits Parts Cleaner 1-55 gallon drum
New Motor Oil, SAE 30 4-10 gallon AGST
New Dextroi II, ATF 3-110 gallon AGST
Chem-Dip Carburetor and Parts Cleaner 10-5 gallon metal cans
Chevron DF-I Diesel Fuel 2-55 gallon drums
Sunshine Car Wash Soap 1-5 gallon plastic bucket
Mopar Immersion Cleaner 1-5 gallon metal can
Gasoline l-portable 30 gallon red metal container
marked gasoline
l-portable 30 gallon yellow metal
container unmarked
5.3 Agency Record Search
Requests for information usually maintained by the Building Department of the City of
Bakersfield Development Services Department reveal that available documentation relating to the subject
site is primarily comprised of construction related permits and applications for permits. No site drawings
or blueprints were available depicting the locations of underground sewer or drain lines.
Review of City of Bakersfield Building Department records revealed that foundation construction
permits were granted for three car service buildings and one car sales building on August 13, 1969.
Plumbing permits dated october 17, 1969 indicated that "Building B' (paint building) possessed one sand
trap, and "Building D' (minor repair building) is indicated as having possessed one floor drain and one
sand trip. Mechanical building permits for the four structures on-site were granted January 23, 1970.
These permits addressed ducts, vents, and other fixtures such as evaporative coolers. Permits for
relocation of signs are dated between March 5 and April 11, 1970. Ali of the preceding permits were
issued for Urner's Chrysler-Plymouth; Dealership. In addition, a permit for the relocation of the sign for
the Valley Olds Dealership was granted May 20, 1981. According to Mrs. Laura Danley of the City of
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 22
Bakersfield Building Department, no other permits, documents, or any site plans, .were on file for the
subject site with the city of Bakersfield Building and Planning Departments.
Officials of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department-Hazardous Materials Division (FD), and the
Kern County Environmental Health Department (EHD) have indicated that they have records on file
concerning underground storage tanks at ~he subject property. There are no reported incidences involving
hazardous materials spills or leaks at the subject property. Review:of information made available by the
FD indicates that this business has not filed a BP with the FD within the last two years. The last BP on
file with the FD was dated January 3, 1989. Furthermore, FD files do not include an updated HMIF as
would have been required, during 1991 and 1992. The last HMIF on file with the FD was dated June
20, 1990.
The last HMIF on file, dated June 20, 1990 indicated that two materials would be stored on-site:
I) antifreeze in plastic containers and in a maximum 70 gallon quantity, and 2) automotive transmission
fluid in metal containers and in a maximum 90 gallon quantity. (This corresponds to Item No. 13 of
section 5.2 of this report).
A previous HMIF on file, dated January 26, 1989 indicated the following products to have been
stored on-site.
Product Container Type Maximum Quantity Stored
Gasoline Underground Tank 2,000 - 4,000 gallons
Motor Oil Drums. or Barrels 220 gallons
Solvent Aboveground Tank 55 gallons
Waste Motor Oil Aboveground Tank 250 gallons
Paint Thinner Metal Container (not drum) 5 gallons
(This corresponds to Item No. 14 of Section 5.2 of this report)
Review of FD and EHD files for the subject site reveal that an underground storage tank permit
application for the subject site was filed in March 1985.. The permit application was for one 10,000-
gallon underground gasoline storage tank, one 500-gallon underground waste solvent storage tank, and
one 2,500-gallon underground waste oil storage tank. However, based upon later records, the waste oil
tank is believed to have a capacity of 500 gallons, not 2,500 gallons as initially reported. The three tanks
were reported to be located in the pm. king area between the minor repair building and the major repair
building. A permit for the three underground storage tanks was granted on July 1, 1986 by the EHD.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 23
EHD and FD records did not indicate the presence of additional underground storage tanks at the subject
site.
EHD and FD records indicate that soil samples were obtained from beneath each of the three
underground storage tanks during a subsurface investigation conducted by Twining Laboratories in June
1988. The subsurface investigation was performed in conjunction with an application to abandon the
underground storage tanks in place. However, the underground storage tank abandonment permit has
since expired, without the abandonment of any of the three underground storage tanks on-site. The soil
samples were obtained by drilling an angled boring beneath each of the underground storage tanks, then
pushing 'a brass sampling tube into undisturbed .soil approximately four feet beneath the center of each
tank. Please see the following table for an indication of analyzed constituents and results:
TABLE I
Soil Sampling at Underground Storage Tanks
Haddad Dodge
4001 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
Twining Laboratories
June 1988 Sampling
(Concentrations are expressed in parts per million, mg/kg.)
Tank Content ' Test Method Constituents Results
Solvent EPA Method 5020, 8020 Total Hydrocarbons (solvent sample) ND
Waste Oil EPA Method 418.1 Oil & Grease ND
Gasoline EPA Method 5020, 8020 Total Hydrocarbons (Gas) ND
Gasoline EPA Method 5020, 8020 Benzene, Toluene, Xylenes ND
Gasoline EPA Method 418. I Oil & Grease ND
ND -- None detected, although detection limits were not noted within the Twining Report.
Results of chemical analysis indicate that no significant concentrations of the above-mentioned
substances were detected within soil samples obtained from below the underground storage tanks at the
subject property. However, the Twining Laboratory report did not indicate the detection limits for their
analysis.. An indication of "none detected" indicates that constituents were not detected at or above the
set detection limit. A detection limit set too high may not report concentrations of constituents that may
still pose a level of concern to the property owner or regulatory authorities.
Conversations with representatives of the Bakersfield Fire Department - Hazardous Materials
Department revved that it is unlikely that these samples could be used for the purposes of undergroUnd
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 24
storage tank removals due to their age. The City of Bakersfield Fire Department allows a temporary
abandonment of Underground storage tanks for up to one year, after which time the underground storage
tanks must be removed or upgraded to comply with the State of California Underground Storage Tank
Regulations prior to being put back into service.
An inspection of the three underground storage tanks at the subject site was conducted by EHD
personnel on July 5, 1988. The inspection report indicated that one 10,000-gallon underground gasoline
storage tank was in use, although two 500-gallon underground storage tanks, reported to have formerly
contained waste oil and solvents, were empty and not in use. Heavy spillage was noted in soils around
the fill pipe of the waste oil tank. A recommendation was made by the EHD to dispose of the oR-tainted
soils around the waste oil tank fill pipe. Later correspondence indicated that these soils had been
removed and disposed. It is unknown if proper disposal practices were utilized.
An inspection of the three underground storage tanks conducted on February 25, 1991 by EHD
personnel revealed that none of the three underground storage tanks on-site were in use. Soils around
the dispenser pipe of the 10,000-gallon underground gasoline storage tank were reported to be stained.
EHD and FD files indicated that the stained soils around the dispenser pipe of the underground gas
storage tank had been removed.
Air Discharge permits for the subject site are on file with the Kern County Office of the San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (APCD). An Authority to Construct and permit
to Operate application was submitted for Bakersfield Dodge in February 1985. The permit concerned
a Spray King Series 200 spray booth and an associated gas fired Model 812 heater unit. The permit was
not initially granted due to deficiencies in the application. A response by Bakersfield Dodge clarified the
inadequacies and provided additional information regarding spray booth equipment specifications and
proposed usage. A one year permit to operate a paint spray booth located at 4001 California Avenue in
Bakersfield was granted to Bakersfield Dodge on March 31, 1985 by the Kern County Air Pollution
Control District. According to representatives of the APCD, permit renewals are automatically issued
after an annual registration and renewal fee is paid by the permit holder. The Haddad Dodge facility has
a current permit with the latest permit renewal dated June 30, 1992 and expiring June 30, 1993.
5.4 Re_~ulator_~ Compliance/Heallh and Safety Code and the California Code of Regulalign-
Applicable sections of Chapter 6.5, Hazardous Waste Control of the California Health and Safety
Code and Division 4.5, Environmental Health Standards for the Management of Hazardous Waste of Title
22 of the California Code of Regulations were researched that 'would appear to relate or refer to activities
or procedures performed at the subject site. Specific sections of the aforementioned regulations were
itemized per section number and a brief summary or paraphrase of each referenced section supplied.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 25
Where applicable, the apparent state of compliance with a sectiOn was noted. Those sections for which
an apparent state of compliance was not indicated were prepared as reference to provide the reader with
additional insight into specific sections that may be applicable to the subject site. Please see the following
tables of. related regulations, their respective section number, a summary or paraphrase of each section
referenced and the apparent stateof compliance for the subject site.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 26
Reg'. Source Ref. No. Summary or Paraphrase Apparent State of Compliance
H&S 25215.2 Disposal of Lead-Acid Battery at Solid Waste facility is banned. Can only be sent to recycler. Unknown - Incomplete records
H&5 25242.2 Civil and criminal actions against violators; civil action for recovery of compliance costs. "The owners, lessee, -
or lessor of any land which is affected by hazardous waste which was disposed on, under, or into the land may
recover the costs incurred in complying with this article."
H&S 25250.4 Used oil shall be managed as a hazardous waste. Incomplete records
H&S 25250.7 Used oil manifests: (see listed manifest requirements this section numberl Non-Compliance
H&S 25293 Monitoring of tank system by operator; record duties of owners and operators. The operator of the UST Incomplete records
system shall monitor .... records shall be kept .... if operator is not the owner, thc owner shall provide a copy
.. of the permit to the operator, enter into an agreement which requires operaor to monitor...
H&S 25298 Abandonment, closing or temporary ceasing of operation of underground Storage tank (see requirements this -
section number)
H&.S 25299 Violations; civil and criminal penalties, -any operator of an UST system shall be liable for $500 to $5,000 for Incomplete records
each UST for each day of violation, -failure to maintain records, - failure to comply with section no. 25293
closure of tank, and kn'owing failure - to take reasonable steps to assure compliance by operator.
H&5 25503.5 Business Plan for emergency response - a business which handles a hazardous material or mixture containing a Incomplete records current BP
hazardous material in quantities equal to or greater than 500 lbs, 55 gallons, or 200 cubic feet shall prepare not available.
and submit a BP.
H&5 25503.6 Business Plan for leased or rented property -any business which is required to establish and implement a BP -
and is located on leased or rented property shall notify in writing the owner of the property and shall provide a
copy of the BP to the owner or owner's agent within five working days after requcs!ed to do so.
H&5 25509 Inventory form; annual reporting requirements. HMIF to be updated annually. Incomplete records. Current
. IHMIF not available
·H&~ 25515 Civil liability -Any business that violates section 25503.5 to 25505, inclusive, or 25508 to 25510, inclusive -
shall be civil liable to thc administering agency or city in an amount not more than $2,000.00 for each day in
which thc violation occurs.
H&5 25514.Co) -After reasonable notice of violation any business that knowingly violates this article shaU be civil liable for an -
administrative penalty of not more than $5,000.00 for each day in which thc violation occurs.
Titlo 22 C.C.R. 66264.173 (a) -A container holding hazardous w~_s!¢ shall always be closed during transfer and storage. Non-Compliancg
Titlc 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (a) -A gcncrator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a permit or grant of interim Incomplete records no labels
status.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ProJeCt No. E92-073
Page No.27
Title 22 C.C.R. 66265.17 "No Smoking" signs shah be conspicuously placed wherever there is a hazard from ignitable or reactive waste. Non-Compliance
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (b) (1) if generator does not generate more than 100 kilograms of hazardous waste the 90 day period begins on the Incomplete records
date the generator has accumulated 100 kilograms of hazardous waste
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (b) (2) If generator generate more than 100 kilograms per month, the 90 day period begins on the first date on which Incomplete records
any amount of hazardous waste begins to accumulate that month.
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (c) A generator who accumulates hazardous waste for more than 90 days is an operator of a storage facility and is Incomplete records
subject to special requirements.
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (e) (1) A generator may accumulate as much as 55 gallons of hazardous waste at or near any point of generation, Incomplete records, no labels
without a permit or grant of interim status if: (A) the waste is accumulated in containers other than tanks at
the initial accumulation point or where the waste is generated, (B) the waste is not held on-site for more than
one year from the date of initial accumulation, (C) the initial date of waste accumulation is clearly marked and
visible on each container.
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.34 (f) (1) Each container and tank used for on-site accumulation of a hazardous waste shall be labeled or marked clearly Non-Compliance
with the words "Hazardous Waste". Furthermore, containers and portable tanks shall be labeled with the
following information: (A) composition and physical state of waste; (B) statements which call attention to the
particular hazardous waste properties of the waste (e.g., flammable, reactive, etc.); (C) name and address of
thc person producing the waste.
Title 22 C.C.R. 66262.40 A generator shall keep a copy of each manifest for three years. Incomplete records
Title 22 C.C.R. 66266.81 A generator shall retain at the generators place of business for a lease three years, a legible copy of each Incomplete records
manifest which identifies spent lead-acid storage batteries shipped to a person who stores, uses, reuses or
recycles or reclaims batteries or components.
Title 22 C.C.R. 66265.176 Containers holding ignitable or reactive waste shall be located at least 15 meters (50 fl~.) from the facilities Non-Compliance
property lines.
H&$ -~ California Health and Safety Code
C.C.R. = California Code of Regulations
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 28
5.5 Limited Soil Sampling and Analysis
Three mechanically advanced borings and two hand augured borings were performed at the
subject site. Mechanically advanced borings were performed utilizing a CME45 truck-mounted drill rig
at locations immediately north and south of the on-site dry well and a central portion of the southern most
parking lot. Mechanically advanced borings were advanced to a maximum of 35 feet below surface
grade.
Hand augured borings were performed at locations extending to below both silt/sand traps located
on-site to a maximum depth of 7.5 feet beloTM surface grade.
Soil samples were collected from all five borings and excess drilling returns and submitted for
chemical analysis to determine the presence and concentrations of selected petroleum related constituents,
volatiles and semi-volatile organics; inorganic, persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances.
During the drill process, soils were examined for visual evidence of contamination. Additionally,
the soil was field screened with a portable photoionization detector (PID). The PID readings were used
to aid in choosing samples for chemical analysis and were noted on the drill logs.
Equipment used for the advance of soil borings and the sampling of soils was decontaminated
(steam-cleaned, TSP, lab-grade detergents, etc.) before leaving the site. The rinsate resulting from
cleaning was contained and barreled on-site. Rinsate samples were obtained and submitted for chemical
analysis to determine the presence and concentrations of selected petroleum related constituents;
inorganic, persistent and bioaccumlative toxic substances, and volatile and semi-volatile organics.
The results of analysis have been summarized in Tables I to VI as follows. For the location of
all borings please refer to Drawing No. 2. For copies of the Certified Analytical Reports and Chain-of-
Custody Records, please refer to Appendix D. For copies of the soil boring logs, please refer to
Appendix E.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 29
TABLE I!
Concentrations of Petroleum Constituents' in Soil
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations ar?xpressed~ parts per million, rng/kg.)
Sample I.D. Oil and Grease TPH-D TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes
B- 1 @ 10' 270 2,100t 730a ND ND ND ND
B-! @ 20' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-2 @ 25' ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
/
B2-@ 30' ND ND ND 0.0194 ND ND ND
B-4 @ 6' 5.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-5 @ 7.5' 11 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Soil Composite 250 272 ND ND ND ND ND
~': = A non-diesel mix chromatograph pattern
= A non-gasoline chromatograph pattern
= Discreet peaks indicated by chromatograph pattern
ND = None detected at detection limit - see analytical results for indicated detection limits
Oil and Grease by EPA Method 418.1
TPH-D (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel) by EPA Methods 3550/8015
TPH-G (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline) by EPA Methods 5030/8015/8020
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pr~ject No. [~~-073
'Page No. 30
TABLE I11
Concentration of Inorganic, Persistent
and Bioaccumuiative Toxic Substances in Soil
Total Threshold Limit Concentration ('VFLC)
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations are expressed in parts per million, mg/kg.)
Background Sample
Constituents B-1 @ 10' B-l @ 20' B-2 @ 25' B-2 @ 30' B-3 @ 10' B-4 @ 6' B-5 @ 7.5 Soil Composite
Antimony ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Arsenic 49 v-' 19 17 13 15 50 36 28
Barium 93 22 23 16 34 83 50 49
Beryllium 0.73 ND ND ND ND 0.67 ND ND
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chromium (III) 12 ~ I 1 5.4 3.3 6.6 11 5.9 5.3
Cobalt 7.4 ND ND ND 3.6 7.1 4.6 3.7
Copper 1.3 ND ND ND ND 38 17 0.33
Lead ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
'Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Molybdenum ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Nickel 7.5/ 5.7 3.2 ND 3.1 6.9 3.6 3.2
Selenium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Thallium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Vanadium 30 , 9.4 8.2 5.8 14 30 21 15
Zinc 46 '"'" 17 12 11 23 97 37 25
ND = None detected at detection limit noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in Appendix D.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E9.'-073
Page No. 31
TABLE iii
Concentrations of Purgeable Organics in Soils, EPA Method 8040
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations are expressed in pans per billion, ug/kg.)
Constituents B-1 @ 10' B-I @ 20' B-2 @ 25' B-2 @ 30' B-3 @ 10' B4 @ 6' B-5 @ 7.5 Soil
Composite
Acetone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Carbon disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Carbon tetrachioride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ' ND ND ND · ND
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloromethane ND ND ND~ ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloroethane ND ND ND ND ND. ND ND ND
l, l -Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND. ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
l, l-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND = None-detected at detection limit noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in Appendix D.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 32
TABLE 111 (con't)
Concentrations of Purgeable Organics in Soils, EPA Method 8040
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and SamPling
(All concentrations are expressed in parts per billion, ug/kg.)
Constituents B-I @ 10' B-I @ 20' B-2 @ 25' B-2 @ 30' B-3 @ 10' B4 @ 6' B-5 @ 7.5 Soil
Composite
cis- 1,2-Dichioroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
trana-1 ;2-Dicloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND .ND ND ND
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND. ND ND
Tetrachloroethene ND N D ND ND ND ND N D ND
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND.
Vinyl acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND = None detected at detection limit noted on the Certified Analytic Reports in Appendix D.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, .INC.
Project No. E92.-073
Page No. 33
TABLE IV
Concentration of Inorganic, Persistent
and Bioaccumulative Toxic Substances in Rinsate Water
Total Threshold Limit Concentration CFTLC)
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(~Ill concentrations are expressed in parts per billion, ug/l.)
Constituents Rinsate
Antimony ND
Arsenic ND
Barium 0.13
Beryllium 'ND
Cadmium ND
Chromium (III) 0.14
Cobalt ND
Copper 0.033
Lead 0.0087
Mercury ND
Molybdenum ND
Nickel 0.077
Selenium ND
Silver ND
Thallium ND
Vanadium 0.056
Zinc 0.19
ND = None detected at detection limits noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in
Appendix D
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 34
TABLE V
Concentrations of Petroleum Constituents in Rinsate Water
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations are expressed in parts per billion, mg/l.)
Sample I.D. Oil and TPH-D TPH-G Benzene Toluene Ethyl- Xylenes
Grease benzene
Rinsate ND- 170~ ND ND ND ND ND
~ = Discreet peaks indicated by chromatograph pattern
ND = None detected at detection limits noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in
Appendix D.
Oil and Grease by EPA Method 418.1
TPH-D (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel) by EPA Methods 355018015
TPH-G (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline) by EPA Methods 50301801518020
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 35
TABLE VI
C6ncentrations of Purgeable Organics in Rinsate Water, EPA Method 8240
Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TFLC)
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations are expressed in parts per billion, ug/l.)
Constituents Rinsate
Acetone ND
Benzene ND
Bromodichloromethane ND
Bromoform ND
Bromomethane ND
2-Butanone ND
Carbon disulfide ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane ND
Dibromochloroethane ND
1,1-Dichloroethane ND
1,2-Dichloroethane ND
l, l-Dichloroethene ND
ND = None detected at detection limits noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in
Appendix D.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 36
TABLE VI (con't)
Concentrations of Purgeable Organics in Rinsate Water, EPA Method 8240
Total Threshold Limit Concentration CVFLC)
Haddad Dodge
Bakersfield, California
September, 1992 Drilling and Sampling
(All concentrations are expressed in parts per billion, ug/I.)
Constituents Rinsate
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene ND
trans- 1,2-Dicloroethene ND
1,2oDichloropropane ND
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
2-Hexan0ne ND
Methylene chloride ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND
Styrene ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND
l, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ND
Vinyl acetate ND
Vinyl chloride ND
Total Xylenes ND
ND = None detected at detection limits noted on the Certified Analytical Reports in
Appendix D.
5.6 Additional Research: Regulatory Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Well
The federal offices of the Environmental Protection Agency-Region IX (EPA) and EHD have
adopted very specific guidelines and procedures designed to outline the appropriate closure of shallow
disposal, dry or injection wells. Guidelines and procedures by both agencies are thoroughly itemized via
the document; "Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells, 1992. ' The following is a summary
of contained information. Please see Appendix F for a complete coy of the aforementioned document.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 37
To Meet the' EPA and EHD requirements, well closure shall include, at a minimum, the
following:
1. Identify the locations of all dry wells, at the facility.
2. Contact EHD or EPA (as appropriate) at least 5 days in advance of any
site operations relating'to closure activities.
3. Take representative samples from the liquid and/or sludge phase present
in the well in accordance with the procedures described in the
"SAMPLING METHODS' AND PROCEDURES' section of the
aforementioned guideline. Copies of sampling and analysis results
including quality control samples must be submitted to regulatory
authorities.
4. Remove the contents from the well and determine appropriate disposal
methods based on the results of the sample analyses. The
owner/operator is ultimately responsible for proper disposal of all wastes.
5. Observe the following closure requirements for wells:
The contents of the dry well, or drainage well (hereinafter called well)
must be removed and disposed of properly. If practical, the well casing
must be removed. Any visibly contaminated soil underlying the
contents of the well must be remediated. Soil samples must be retrieved
in the center of the bottom of the well in the manner described in the
guideline and analyzed by a certified laboratory. If sampling from the
bottom, of the well is not possible, samples may be retrieved from the
opposite sides of the well, at a distance not to exceed one foot from the
borehole or well, and starting at a depth that is equivalent to well
bottom. Soil samples should also be retrieved at suspected worst-case
locations, such as elbows, joints, floor drains and clarifiers.. All soil
samples should be analyzed using methods listed in the guideline. The
hole where the well has been removed must be filled with grout and
sealed with asphalt or cement.
6. Contact state and local agencies and incorporate their requirements into
the well closure plans.
7. Submit a report upon completion of well closure activities that includes
the following items:
· A plot plan showing locations of disposal or drainage ·
well(s), sampling points, buildings and adjacent streets.
Indicate the north direction by an arrow.
· Copies of all fluid, sludge and soil samples analysis
results, and r~ults of all quality control samples.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. .'
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 38
· Copies of manifests or other documentation pertaining to
proper disposal of all removed liquid, sludge and soil.
· A description of the extent of site contamination: Should
site remediation appear necessary, recommendations
from a registered geologist or registered civil engineer,
with sufficient experience in soils, should be included to
address the problem.
8. Include, on all reports submitted to EPA that relate to well closure
activities, the certification given in the "Requirements for Contractors"
section of the aforementioned guidelines.
9. It is the responsibility of the owner or operator to ensure that further site
evaluation be conducted if analytical results of the soil samples indicate
the presence of contamination.
10. Ali submittal are to be sent to:
K.C. Environmental Health Services Department
HMMP - Enforcement
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
For the complete closure requirements, please refer to Appendix F.
6.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The project site is the Haddad Dodge auto complex located at 4001 California Avenue,
Bakersfield, California. The project site is irregular in shape and encompasses approximately 5.4 acres.
The Haddad Dodge auto complex is primarily comprised of five structures and driveway or
parking areas. The structures observed include the new car showroom and administrative building, the
used car sales office, the 'minor repair building, the major repair building, and the paint and body
building. The new car showroom and administrative building occupied the northwest portion of the
subject site. The used car office occupies a northeast portion of the subject site immediately north of the
minor repair building. The minor repair building occupies a northeast portion of the subject site directly
east of the new car showroom and administration building. The major repair building occupies a central
eastern portion of the subject site located approximately 50 feet south of the minor repair building. The
paint and body building occupies a southeast portion of the subject site located approximately 50 feet
south 'of the major repair building.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 39
Located immediately south of a central portion of the minor repair building is a single fuel
dispenser associated with a 10,000-gallon underground fuel tank, a 500-gallon underground waste oil tank
and a 500-gallon underground solvent tank. Information available at the EHD indicates that all three
tanks were first permitted for operation during 1985. Available information indicates that by June 1988,
only one 10,000-gallon underground fuel storage tank was in operation and that by February 1991, none
of the three underground storage tanks were being utilized.
EHD and FD records indicate that soil samples were obtained from beneath each of ·the three
underground storage tanks during a subsurface investigation conducted in June 1988. Soil.samples were
obtained by drilling an angled boring beneath each of the underground storage tanks. Results of chemical
analyses indicate that no significant concentration of the analyzed hydrocarbon constituents were detected
within soil samples obtained from below the underground storage tanks at the subject property. However,
the sampling results report did not indicate the detection limits set for the detection of the aforementioned
constituents. An indication of "non-detected" indicates that constituents were not detected at or above
the set detection limit. A detection limit set too high may not report concentrations of constituents that
may still pose a level of concern to the property owner or regulatory authorities. It is our opinion that
because at least one underground storage tank was in use since the soil sampling and analysis was
performed during June 1988 there is no current information regarding the condition of the underground
storage tanks or soils beneath them.
EHD files indicate that at least on one occasion, representatives of Haddad Dodge were instructed
to monitor all three tanks at least once every two weeks. Available on-site files for information did not
include inventory or monitoring records for the on-site underground storage tanks. Current regulations
required that the tank systems be monitored and records maintained. Monitoring and record keeping·
observed at the Haddad Dodge facility were not in compliance with current guidelines. Representatives:.
of Haddad Dodge should take all appropriate steps to ensure that the tanks are properly maintained and
monitored and that ali required records be maintained or that the undergrOund storage tanks be properly
abandoned in accordance with applicable regulations.
The eastern most service bays or portions thereof, within both the minor repair building and the
paint and body building were designed for use as wash bays. Located beneath the sloped concrete floor
slab of both wash bays is a single large silt/sand trap. Access to each silt/sand trap can be made via a
large perforated drain inlet cover or a large.service cover. Each silt/sand trap is approximately 8 feet
in length and 4 to 5 feet diameter with a fiat bottom surface.
The drain inlet and surface covers of both silt/sand traps were removed and the system observed.
Each silt/sand trap was observed-to be divided into two separate containment areas. The northern most
containment section of the silt/sand trap located in the minor repair building was observed to contain a
KRAZAN &'ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 40
dark grey liquid with silts, sands and amounts of thick black sludge. The southern most section was
observed to primarily contain a thick dark grey sludge with little or no free liquid.
Upon removing both covers, the silt/sand trap emitted a strong petroleum-type odor.
Both the northern and southern containment sections of the silt/sand trap located in the paint and
body building were observed to contain a dark grey liquid. No obvious signs of silts, sands or sludges
were observed. Upon removing both covers, the silt/sand trap emitted a moderate unidentified odor.
At the time of our reconnaissance, both wash bays appeared to be utilized as storage areas for
such items as diesel fuel, paint product waste material, a hazardous materials storage locker, and a diesel
fired steam cleaner. Because the concrete floor slabs of both wash bays are sloped toward the drain
inlets, it is highly likely that any leak or discharge of a liquid type product would quickly migrate tOward
the silt/sand'trap inlet and may ultimately reach the city sewer system. Any unnecessary equipment or
stored supplies in these areas, should be removed to locations where they may be appropriately stored.
The silt/sand traps observed did not appear to have been routinely monitored and/or serviced. The built-
.up of sludge and sediments will impede the operation of the silt/sand traps.- The tenant should establish
a routine inspection and service plan so that any unnecessary of build up of silts, sands or sludge does
not impede their proper performance. Because the nature of the build up within the silt/sand traps is not
known the tenant may have to have their contents analyzed prior to proper disposal.
Two hand augured borings were performed at locations extending to below both silt/sand traps
located within the wash bays of the minor and paint and body buildings to a maximum depth of 7.5 feet
below surface grade corresponding to a depth of approximately I to 2-1/2 feet below the bottom of each
silt/sand irap. Soil samples were collected from beneath each silt/sand trap and submitted for chemical
analysis to determine the presence and concentrations of petroleum related constituents, volatiles and
semi-volatile organics, and inorganic persistent and bioaccumlative toxic substances.
Analytical results for soil samples obtained from beneath the silt/sand traps displayed minor
concentrations (5. I and 11 ppm) of oil and grease. The samples obtained did not display detectable levels
of other petroleum products for which the samples were analyzed. The samples obtained were analyzed
for concentration of inorganic, persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances in soil and subsequently
cross-checked against results of a background soil sample obtained from on-site. The samples obtained
from beneath the silt/sand trap located within the minor repair building (Boring No. B-4) appeared to
possess elevated levels of arsenic, barium, copper, vanadium, and zinc when compared to the assumed
~alIy, t~e sample obtained from beneath the silt/sand trap located
background
levels
(Boring
B-3).
/~fiFn~fl~-pai'~'-t ~i~ling !Boring No. B-5) appeared to possess elevated concentrations of
arsenic, copper, vanadium, and zinc when compared to the assumed background levels. However, the
total metal concentrations for the two borings (B4 and B-5) were below the total threshold limit
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
· Project No. E92-073
Page No. 41
concentration (TrLC) for each metal. Additionally, only arsenic in B-4 at 6 feet appeared capable of
possibly exceeding the soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) when considering the 10-fold dilution
for extraction for the STLC analyses.
The facility utilizes a gravity injection well (or dry well) to remove rain from a paved area located
between the minor and major repair buildings. The dry well is located approximately one foot west of
the eastern property line and approximately 16 feet north of the major repair building. Representatives
Of Haddad Dodge have indicated that the dry well may be two feet in diameter and extend to a depth of
approximately 30 feet below grade. Two borings (B-I and B-2) were advanced immediately north and
south of the dry well to a maximum depth of 35 feet below grade.
Sele~' ' ' boring-N-6~-~'~ and2 were analyzed for concentrations of
petroleum constituentS; inorganic, persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances and purgeable organics.
A soil sample obtained from 10 feet of depth within Boring No. I displayed the following petroleum
product constituentS: oil and grease at 270 ppm, ~ro~c_ax~0n__s.__~ ~i_~l at 2,100 ppm,..
and total petroleum hydrocarbon as gasoline a~:....?A sdil sample obtained from 20 feet of depth
within Boring No. 1 did not display detectable levels of petroleum productS.
The sample obtained from 10 feet in depth within Boring No. I appeared to display metal
concentrations above presumed background levels and anticipated y~riances. Metals for which possible
elevated concentrations were detected include~.arsenic, barium, copper, vanadium, and zinc. /A soil
sample obtained from 20 feet of depth within Boring No. I did not appear to display elevated levels of
metals when compared to the assumed background levels. Additionally, the concentrations of the metals
analyzed from both Boring B-1 and B-2 were below the TI'LC for each metal and none appeared capable
of exceeding the STLC.
A soil sample obtained from 30 feet of depth within Boring No. 2 displayed a 0.019 ppm
concentration of benzene. No other constituents for which the samples were analyzed were detected
within samples obtained from Boring No. 2.
The detected levels of constituents within Boring Nos. I and 2 located immediately adjacent to
the dry well on-site suggest that an unknown quantity of hydrocarbon material has been released into the
soils at or near the dry well location. The indicated levels of detected constituents will likely be of
concern to local regulatory authorities. We recommended that the dry we~erly
abandoned in accordance with all applicables.
The detected levels of constituents within Boring Nos. 4 and 5 located beneath silt/sand traps on-
site suggest that an unknown quantityof a hydrocarbon material had been released into the soils at or near
the silt/sand traps. The indicated levels of detected constituentS may be of concern to the local regulatory
authorities.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 42
We recommend that either: copies of this report be released to the EHD and FD or, a separate
letter be prepared detailing the results of the soil sampling and analysis and forwarded to the EHD and
FD. It is our belief that the most appropriate notification method would be to prepare a separate letter.
Review of available information maintained on-site included a letter and information request 0tern
10 in Section 5.2) prepared and forwarded by the EPA to the Haddad Dodge offices. As part of the
information requested, the recipient was specifically asked to indicate the number of (if any) storm water
drainage well(s) located on-site. Under federal guidelines, the dry well located on2site can be defined
as a stormwater drainage gravity injection well. However, the response to the questionnaire (Appendix
A) forwarded by Haddad Dodge representatives was that no storm water drainage wells were located on-
site. The returned questionnaire did incorrectly respond to the requested information. Haddad Dodge
representatives have n._ve___.n_?.t~cot com~ied with the aforementioned information request. ~
Activities at the subject site required that amounts of automotive-typ~s be stored, transferred
or sold as part of automotive maintenance. New or unused liquids of significant quantities observed at
the subject site include motor oils, transmission fluids, antifreeze, gasoline, or diesel fuel, parts washing
solvent and paints or associated paint products. New or unused gases observed at the subject site include
oxygen acetylene, and freon.
Waste liquids observed at the subject site included motor oils, antifreeze, paints, and parts
washing solvent. Upon an examination, none of the observed waste containers displayed appropriate
labels. The tenant should take ali appropriate steps to insure that all waste containers'are appropriately
labeled. Current guidelines require that a hazardous waste be labeled or marked clearly with the words
"hazardous waste". Furthermore. containers shall be labeled with the following information: A)
composition and physically state of waste; B) statements which call attention to the particular hazardous
waste properties of the waste (flammable, reactive, etc...), C) name and address of the person producing
the waste, D) the initial date that first waste accumulation began, and E) as appropriate, the date that
waste accumulation discontinued. Labeling procedures observed at the Haddad Dodge facility were not
in compliance with current guidelines.
The majority of the waste containers observed on-site did not have lids. The tenant should take
all appropriate steps to insure that waste containers are properly stored and fitted with tight-fitting lids.
Waste container management observed at the Haddad Dodge facility were not in compliance with current
guidelines.
Areas utilized for the storage of hazardous waste materials did not display placards indicating
those areas as no smoking zones. Because liquid waste products stored on-site, including waste oils and
:
waste paint products are subject to ignition, the tenant should take all appropriate steps to insure that these
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 43
areas are conspicuously marked as non smoking zones or no-smoking areas. Placarding practices
observed at the Haddad Dodge facility were not in compliance with current guidelines.
An area located immediately north of the major repair building and west of the eastern property
line was observed to be utilized for the temporary storage of 20 and 55 gallon waste oil drums and one
250 gallon aboveground .waste oil storage tank. The concrete and asphalt surfaces beneath the
aboveground tank and drums displayed signs of minor surface staining. The concrete and asphalt surfaces
were observed to gently slope toward the north, towards the adjacent dry well inlet. No form of
secondary containment is utilized in this area to insure that spilled or released liquids are captured before
migrating toward the dry well inlet. The aboveground waste oil storage tank and storage drums should
be relocated to an area that is better suited to contain spills and not in close proximity to the dry well or
property lines. Current guidelines insist that containers holding ignitable waste be located at least 15
meters from the facility property line. The placement of waste containers adjacent to the subject site
property line as observed is not in compliance with current guidelines.
Any oil-stained areas within the subject site including but not limited to the aforementioned drum
storage area should be thoroughly cleaned of all residue or discoloration. Residue or waste generated
should be properly disposed of.
A paint booth is located in the eastern-most portion of the paint and body building between the
wash bay and the east end of the building. The paint booth is primarily a flee-standing unit measuring
approximately 14 feet in width and 22 feet in length. The c0ncr_e?_.._fl_oo~o_rin~g_~i~i~_.~e._~!..n_t~0~.._g_e_~_tl?
slopes toward its center where d ra!n is ~ocated. According to representatives of the
APCD, the Haddad Dodge facility currently holds a permit to operate the paint spray booth. This permit
will expire on June 30, 1993.
A small concrete bock wall storage room is located immediately west of the paint booth. The
storage room is primarily used for the storage of new and used paint products.
The western 3/4 of the paint .and body building is separated from the paint booth and wash bay
segment by a concrete block wall. Observed at the southeast most corner of the western 3/4 of the paint
and body building was a pile of discarded new or used paint products. The paint products observed were'
stored in one pint to one gallon sized metal cans. Discoloration of the flooring adjacent to the discarded
cans suggest that leaking may have occurred in the past. If these products are intended for future use,
they should be returned to the paint storage room or an appropriate hazardous materials storage locker.
In the event that these products are not intended for use, they should be properly disposed of. In the
event that these products have previously or are currently leaking any spill should be appropriately
:
contained and properly disposed of.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 44
Housed within the sales and administration building of the auto complex, is a parts sales
distribution and storage area. At the time of our reconnaissance approximately 61 products of COncern
were noted to be stored within this area. Typical products observed include, carburetor cleaner, power
steering fluid, automatic transmission fluid, paints, antifreeze, compressed gas, solvents, grease or lube,
lead acid batteries, freon, brake fluid, and propane fuel.
During our on-site reconnaissance a review of all available files or information was made. No
single organized file or source of information was available at the subject site. No single Haddad Dodge
representative appeared to, when questioned, be fully aware of the whereabouts of organized fries or
information usually maintained by the operator of similar facilities. However, a source of information
was found to be two red binders maintained by the administrative offices, within which random
information was placed. A second limited source of information was found to be the services/supplier
tiles maintained by the administrative offices of the Haddad's Mitsubishi Auto Center, located at 3000
Harris Road, Bakersfield, California. Review of this information revealed 22 documents or portions
thereof that contained information providing an insight into activities at the subject site. Information
available included hazardous waste manifests for the shipment of waste products off-site, a summary of
paint Or solvent usage quantities during 1900, a Fire Department inspector's check-list, portions of a
business plan, at least three hazardous materials inventory forms or portions thereof, an air pollution
control districts air toxics inventory plan, invoices or service contracts indicating the recycling or removal
of waste products, and approximately 237. MSDS sheets for products that may have been used, are used
or have been proposed for use at the subject site.
Comparison of observed on-site products with available on-site MSDS sheets revealed that
approximately 46 products are utilized or stored for which MSDS sheets were not available.
Representatives of Haddad Dodge should take appropriate steps to insure that MSDS sheets are available
for all products for which the manufacturer is required to make available MSDS and are stored, handled,
or used on-site.
Review of available information and observations made on-site indicate that the waste generated
through on-site activities would include, but may not be limited to, waste oil, waste paint or related waste
paint products such as thinners, waste solvents, waste antifreeze, and used lead acid batteries. However,
the available information does not allow for the complete reconciliation of all waste trains. Detailed
records were not available that would clearly indicate the ultimate destination of waste products generated
on-site. The tenant should take all appropriate steps to insure that required information or records are
properly maintained and/.or are available. These records could include, but may not be limited to, all
applicable permits, underground storage tank history and condition inspection records, waste stream
generation, waste product destination and manifests, hydraulic lift service history, BP and HMIF reCOrds,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 45
product' usage rates, typical waste accumulation time, and all regulatory authority correspondence.
Current regulations require that records be maintained and are available for review. It should be
understood that whether or not a business or facility is in compliance with most regulations may depend
upon the available.documentation. All documents/files should be properly maintained , accessible to
employees and well organized.
Request for information usually maintained by the Building Department of the City of Bakersfield
Development Services Department reveal that available documentation related to the subject site is
primarily comprised of construction related permits and applications from permits. No site drawings or
blueprints were available depicting the locations of underground sewer or drain lines. Review of the
'available information indicates that structures occupying the subject site were constructed during the
period spanning late 1969 through early 1970.
Officials of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division and the Kern
County Environmental Health Department have indicated that they have records on file concerning
underground storage tanks at the subject property. There are no reported incidence involving hazardous
material spills or leaks at the subject property. Review of information made available by the FD indicates
that this business has not filed a BP with the FD within the last two years. The last BP on file with the
FD was dated January 3, 1989. Furthermore, FD files do not include an up-dated HMIF as would have
been required within the last year 1991. The last HMIF on file with the FD was dated June 20, 1990.
Current regulations require that the BP be updated at least every two years or whenever a change in
previously reported information occur, furthermore, current regulations require that the HMIF be updated
at least every year or when a change in reported information occurs. Haddad Dodge representatives
should take every appropriate step to insure that they comply with all current BP guidelines as
administrated by the FD, including but not limited to the preparation and availability of a BP and
HMIF.
Under current guidelines the lessor could request from the tenant copies of their current BP and
HMIF. Failure to make available this information within five days would be a breach of State code.
Periodic request, and review of this information may provide the leasor insight into tenant activities,
material or product storage, and compliance status.
As part of our research, guidelines indicating the required steps or procedures to appropriately
perform a closure of shallow disposal or injection wells were researched. The EPA and the EHD have
adopted very specific guidelines and procedures designed to outline the appropriate closure of shallow
disposal dry or injection wells. Guidelines and procedures are thoroughly itemized in the document of
"Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells, 1992' as made available by both agencies. Please
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 46
· reference 5.6 of this report for a summary of the referenced guideline or see Appendix F for a complete
copy of this document.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
The preparation of this report and activities necessary to gather pertinent data or information has
been limited in scope. The findings presented in this report were based on field observations, review of
'available data or information made available by both on-site representatives and local regulatory and
advisory agencies. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the
sources and methods used.
Information, observations, quantities, etc.. reported as part of this report may have been
determined from direct observation and have been reported as appropriately as field conditions may have
allowed. Reported information reflects conditions observed at the time of our reconnaissance.
The findings of this report were based upon the results of our field and laboratory investigations,
coupled with the interpretations of subsurface conditions associated with our soil borings. Therefore, the
data are accurate only to the degree implied by review of the dated obtained and by professional
interpretation.
The exploratory soil boring locations were located in the field by tape measurement for existing
landmarks. Therefore, the soil boring locations would be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used to locate them.
Chemical testing was done by laboratories approved by the State of California Departments of
Health Services. The results of chemical analysis are accurate only to the degree of care of ensuring the
testing accuracy and the representative nature of the soil samples obtained.
The findings presented herewith are based upon professional interpretation using state of the art
methods and equipment and a degree of conservation deemed proper as of this report date. It is not
warranted that such data cannot be superseded by further geotechnical, environmental, or technical
developments.
Our investigation and report were prepared for the exclusive use of our client who authorized this
work. Unauthorized use of or reliance on the information contained in this report without the expressed
written consent of Krazan & Associates, Inc. is strictly prohibited.
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Project No. E92-073
Page No. 47
if there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
· our Environmental Division Office at (209) 348-2200 or (800) 800-0711.
Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kevan H. Paluso
Project Engineer
-. Dean Alexander
Geotechnical Engineer
RGE 'g002051/RCE #34274
KHP/DA/sf
2c herewith
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.