Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK FILE #2 1:10 Suite 203 · · :~:: Telephone (8051.39640451 Califomia~93309.' . ~: ...... . . ,. :-;: .,. ". , ., ~ Telecopier (805) 39650453 .. Bakersfield CA' 93301 ' '" '.- .~: :RE:i '..Underg~ Storage Tank at.3100 Chester Avenue· .... Dear Mr: Huey:: · - : .... - ~ ' ,I§ 0ke:with H0wardWines of yo'hr' depart'ment.Thurs'day.and discussed' our firm's ~. "intent.. preserve.the above tank as ev,.idence feruse ,in future .litigation..-'A~s you can .see. from the q. dated April 17; 1996, .the tank· was'dry.and ~con.tained no· ..... d~bri~ at. th'~ ~time -Furiher.investigation~ indicates the. tank is in-,excess .of 50. ,~ .. year-s °ld....;,Given ~the tani~'.s/age and-the:fact that it .has been, p'erfora.ted ih s~veraFPlaCes, any'material that :might'.hhve been in, the tank., appears'to, have dissipated long ago..'The tank does not appear to contain any'reSidual hazardous substanceg;,.w,astes 'or materials . .. 'The 'remain· the pr0P,e,~;t~ Of Kern'High School' District'. and' will: be transPorted to-a 'secured."location at, One of the District's' facilities fog. safe"keeping: .~- ..Although.~ .~....'the?tank, ~ ~ ~UZill :not beI~ ~._ ....disPPsed'~"°,f at this time, it will not' be .-used,to. ~S~o'~e..: any.. -' ..... . ~.." The lab . results f0'r. soil samples taic6ri befleath.the tank" and any.0the~: r~qtiired:,:. ·. .. docu¢.ent!,wi]!.be_.prow your office as soon.as possible:: Sh0gldyou .x0ish to dislcu_ss ' :-: ' ' this 'matter'in .greater detlail: pl'easb' do, not-hesitate to c0ntactme. .. "' V~ry truly yours - - . , -.,. ,'WM. TODDBERRY - - BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT December 2, 1996 FIRE CHIEF MICHAEL R, KELLY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 '.'Street Mr. Wm. Todd Berry, Esq. Bakersfield, CA 93301 (808)326-3941 Law Offices of Gary M. Fachin FAX (805) 395-1349 1 10 South Montclair, Suite 203 Bakersfield, Ca 93309 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA9330I CLOSURE OF 1 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE (8O5) 326-3941 rAx(~)395-i3~9 TANK LOCATED AT 3100 CHESTER AVENUE. PERMIT #BR-0150. PEEVENTIONSERVICES Dear Mr. Berry: 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results for the proliminary assessment associated with the closure of the tank located E.V,,O.UE.t^, SERV,C[S at the above stated address. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 FAX (805)326-0576 Based upon laboratory data submitted, this office is satisfied with the assessment performed and requires no further action at this time. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 If yOU have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805) 399-4697 (805)326-3979. FAX (805) 3gq-5763 Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III H~.ardous Materials Technician HHW/dlm cc: Kathy Gill, RWQCB Bill Rosica, Lutrel Brian Pitts, KCEHSD 07/15/1996 18:39 805-3960453 GARY M FACHIN PAGE 02 LAW OFFICES OF GARY M. FA CHIN 110 ~th M~tclair, Suite 203 T~lcp~nc (g05) 396-~51 ~rsfield, Calif~a ~309 Tclccopier (g05) 396-~53 July 15, 1996 Ralph E. Hucy BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Underground Storage Tank at 3100 Cl~ester Avenue Dear Mr. Huey: I spoke with Howard Wines of your department Ttlursday and discussed our firm's intent to preserve the above tank as evidence for use in future litigation. As you can sec from the PERMIT APPLICATION dated April 17. 1996, tl~e tank was dry and contained m~ debris at the time of removal. Further investigation indicates the tank is in excess of 50 years old. Given the tank's age and the fact that it has been perforated in several places. any material that might have been in the tank appears to l~ave dissipated long ago. Thc tank does not appear to contain any residual hazardous substances, wastes or materials which could produce flammable vapors. The tank will remain the property of Kern High School D/strict and will be transported to a secured location at one of the District's facilities for safe keeping. Although the tank will not be disposed of at this time, it will not be used to store any type of material, hazardous or otl~erwise. The lab results for soil samples taken beneath the tank and any other required documents will be provided to your office as soon as possible. Should you wisl~ Io disct~ss this matter in greater detail please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours~ WM. TODD BERRY WTB/ 0~ks. 10~HSD TRUCKING, INC. '[ JUL 1 81996 6315 SNOW ROAD By_ B~RSFIELD, C~IFO~IA 93308 ~ Phone (805) 399-0246 · F~ (805) 399-0311 Mr. Ralph Huey July 17, 1996 City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Division Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Underground Storage Tank discovered at 3100 Chester Ave. Mr. Huey: The Law Offices of Gary Fachin asked that we inform you of the situation at the former Kern High School District Maintenance yard at 3100 Chester Ave. Lutrel Trucking and Environmental Services is under contract with the School District to remediate the property of contaminated soil. During that operation, we discovered an underground storage tank. Upon discovery, we informed your department, obtained a permit and subsequently removed the tank. Samples were taken at two feet, six feet below the bottom of the tank and at the bottom of our excavation, which was 30 feet and where we encountered groundwater. (Results are attached) Mr.. Mark Turk of your department was on site to witness the removal. The Law Offices of Gary Fachin ask that the tank not be disposed of at this point in time as they would like to hold it for evidence for a possible law suit involving the former owners. The tank will be secured on the property or possibly brought back to our yard on Snow Road for safe-keeping until such time as it is needed. The two (2) samples that were taken after the tank was removed, one at two feet (2') and one at six feet (6') indicated TPH-g levels of 360 ppm and 1,500 ppm respectively. Since Lutrel was excavating the area anyway, soil was removed, transported and recycled down to a depth of thirty feet (30'). Of the five (5) samples taken after excavation was completed, only two (2) showed any evidence of Hydrocarbon contamination and the levels were well below the action limit of 100 ppm. Lutrel Trucking and Environmental Services requests that the site beneath the underground storage tank require "No Further Action" from the City Fire Department. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to call me at 399-0246. ~Sincerely,~_~, W~m J. "Bill" Rosica Environmental Operations Manager cc: Mark Lutrel, Lutrel Trucking and Environmental Services Randy Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates Todd Berry, Law Offices of Gary Fachin Attachments BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805.) 326-3979 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION Name perjury that the tank(s) located at 3150 O~%~ ~ and Address being removed under permit# ~-~b~ has been cleaned/decontaminated properly and a LEL (lower explosive limit) reading of no greater than 5% was measured immediately following the cleaning/decontamination process. Date Name (print) Signature C°nfirmati°n bY: .~_~~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~~ City of Bakersfield LABORATORIES Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/18/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/17/96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04506-1 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description:- HIGH SCHOOL 94-10-04: UST 2' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/17/96 @ 02:05PM Date Extracted-8020: 04/18/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/18/96 Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/18/96 Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 04/18/96 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.7 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.7 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.7 Total Xylenes 9.2 mg/kg 2. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 360. mg/kg 200. Surrogate % Recovery 87. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Sample chromatogram not typical of gasoline. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report dteretlon, separation, detachmenl or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1918 LABORATORIES Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics· and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/18/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/17/96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04506-2 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description: HIGH SCHOOL 94-10-04: UST 6' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/17/96 @ 02:06PM Date Extracted-8020: 04/18/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/18/96 Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/18/96 Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 04/18/96 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.7 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.7 Ethyl Benzene 3.1 mg/kg 0.7 Total Xylenes 44. mg/kg 2. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 1500. mg/kg ~ 200. Surrogate % Recovery 88. % 70~130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method o Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target anal~tes requiring s~Inple dilution. Sample chromatogram not typical of gasoline. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report ~lteretlon, separation, detachment or third party interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-491 I · FAX [805) 327-191 8 Name: ,58hV((~5 Project: ~'~ 1- N Address: 631~ ~N,O~ Pr0ject~: City~~l,~l g Sampler Name: State: ~,,~ Zip: 9~ Other: '5 ~ ~ = ~ ~ E= '~c · s go zo Lab~ Sample Description ~ate & Time Sampled ! / ~Rel' ' by: (Signature) Rec'eived by: (Signature) . ~ ~ate:.Time: Comment: Billing Info: tR?~~y (Signat~ Name: Lu~ ~e[v,,q~/ Address ~i5 City 3a~Lj~l~ld State C,~1,'4'. Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: Attention: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: Time: Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: ~ Sample Disposal P.O.~ d BC Disposal ~ 5.00 ea. Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: ~ Return to client State:~f~ Zip: 9~30~ Other: o Lab~ Sample Description Date & Time Sampled Comment: Billing Info: ~elin~u~: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Name: Lu~ 5 ~)'~ /~t~ R~ished by: (Signature) ture) Date: Time: Ci~ ~5~3~'~1~ 'State C~Ii~ Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: A~ention: ~f j'j ~ I'(A Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (signature) Date: Time~ Time: Milos: ~el}nquished by: (Si~naturo) Becoivod by: (Signature) Date: limo: Samplo ~isposal P.O.~ ~ BO ~ispoml ~ 5.00 oa. ~olinquishod by: {Si~naturo) ~eceived by: (Si~naturo) Dalo: Time: ~ ~omm to diont JUL ~ 8 1996 6315 Snow Road ~ ~ Bakersfield, CA 93308 Fueling Systems Installation Phone (805)399-0246 Lic. # 675587 Removal and Remediation Fax (805) 399-0311 Mr. Ralph Huey July 17, 1996 City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Division Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Underground Storage Tank discovered at 3100 Chester Ave. Mr. Huey: The Law Offices of Gary Fachin asked that we inform you of the situation at the former Kern High School District Maintenance yard at 3100 Chester Ave. Lutrel Trucking and Environmental Services is under contract with the School District to remediate the property of contaminated soil. During that operation, we discovered an underground storage tank. Upon discovery, we informed your department, obtained a permit and subsequently removed the tank. Samples were laken at the bollom of our excavation, which was 30 feet and where we encountered groundwater. (Results are attached) Mr. Mark Turk of your department was on site to wimess the removal. The Law Offices of Gary Fachin ask that the lank not be disposed of at this point in lime as they would like to hold it for evidence for a possible law suit involving the former owners. The tank will be secured on the property or possibly brought back to our yard on Snow Road for safe-keeping until such time as it is needed. Of the five (5) samples taken, only two (2) show any evidence of Hydrocarbon contamination and the levels were well below the action limit of 100 ppm. Lutrel Trucking and Environmental Services requests that the site beneath the underground storage tank require "No Further Action" from the City Fire Department. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to call me at 399-0246. Sincerely,~ Wil!j~fin J. "Bill" Rosica Environmental Operations Manager cc: Mark Lutrel, Lutrel Tracking and Environmental Services Randy Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates Todd Berry, Law Offices of Gary Fachin Attachments LABORATORIES Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/22/96 6315 SNOW ROD/) Date Received: 04/19/96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04610-1 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample.Description: KERN HIGH SCHOOL 94-10-04: WEST EXCAVATION E. SIDE 30' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/19/96 ® 03:laPM Date Extracted-8020: 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/19/96 Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 ... Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg Total Petroleum ,~ Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 92. % 70-130 .TEST METHOD: ..TPH by-D.O.;H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method ,.Modified EPA .~,j Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ' ~i .~ California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting perry. BC L.boretorles, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. '41 O0 Atlas CC. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · [805) 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1 918 LABORATORIES Page Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/22/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/19/96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04610-2 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description: KERN HIGH SCHOOL 94-10-04: WEST EXCAVATION W. SIDE 30' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/19/96 ® 03:16PM Date Extracted-8020: 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/19/96 Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Practical ]knalysis Reportin9 Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/k~ 0.005 Total Xylenes. None Detected mg/k~ 0.01 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 88. % 70-130 · TEST METHOD: TPH-by D.O.H.S; / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 " ~, ~ Stuart G. Buttram , Department Supervisor , ,i All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for repo~ literetion, separation, detachmenl or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX (805] 327-1 918 LABORATORIES Page Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/22/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/19/96 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04610-3 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description[ KERI~. HIGH SCHOOL.94-10-04: WEST EXCAVATION BOTTOM 30' SAMPLED BY' ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/19/96 ® 03:00PM Date Extracted-8020: 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/19/96 ...... Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Date Analyzed- 8015M (g): 04/19/96 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg -. 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 EthYl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Xylenes. None Detected mg/kg 0.01 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 89. % 70-130 -~ TEST-METHOD: -TPH by-D-.O~H~S'~-/ L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 '' Stuart G. Buttram '" Department Supervisor ~. . '~ All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting pa~y. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report slteratlon, separation, detachment or third party interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX (805] 327-1 91 8 LABORATORIES Page Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 04/22/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/19/96 BA/~ERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04610-4 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description: KERN HIGH SCHOOL 94-10-04: WEST EXCAVATION S. SIDE 30' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/19/96 ® 03:25PM . ~ Date Extracted-8020: 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/19/96 Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Date Analyzed- 8015M (g): 04/19/96 Practical .g_nalysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected ag/kg 0. 005 Ethyl Benzene 0. 009 ag/kg 0. 005 Total Xylenes .. 0. 057 ag/kg 0.01 Hydrocarbons (gas) 6.8 mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 100. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH-by D.O.H..S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 I - FAX (805) 327-1 918 LABORATORIES Page Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUTREL SERVICES · Date Reported: 04/22/96 6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 04/19/96 B/LKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-04610-5 Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 Sample Description: KERN HIGH SCH00~..~4-10-04: WEST EXCAVATION N. SIDE 30' SAMPLED BY ROSICA Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 04/19/96 @ 03:20PM Date Extracted-8020: 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8020: 04/19/96 . . . Date Extracted-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 04/19/96 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg ' 0.005 Total Xylenes. None Detected mg/kg 0.01 -~Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 2.8 mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 98. % 70-130 ._.-TEST-METHOD: .TPH--by-D.O.H..S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015~%'i'~ii '!.!:ii Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ¥ii ~:i Note: Sample chromatogram not typical of gasoline. California D.O.H.S. Cert. g1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party Interpretation. 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805] 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1 918 87/17/1996 17:86 805-3960453 GARY M FACHIN PAGE 01 Law Offices of GARY M. FACHIN 110 South Montclair, Suite 203 Bakersfield, California 93309 (805) 396-0451 FAX # (805) 396-0453 Illllllll I II I I I DATE: July ~7, ~[996 FAX #: 326.0576 TO: ~oward Wines - Office of Enviro~nmental Services FIRM: Bakersfield Fire D. epartment FROM: Wm. Todd Berry, Esq. .... Total Pages (Including Cover Page) 7 Original Will Not Follow [ ] Original Will Follow Response Needed B_y Time B~yU.S. Mail IXX] Date Please Call Upon Receipt [ } For Your Approval/Suggestions [ ] COMME/cr Sl~CTION: Re: Kern High School District Underground Tank at 3100 Chester Avenue Attached please.find the following documents regarding soil samples taken beneath the underground tank at 3100 Chester: (1) ILFC, Inc. Laboratory Analysis Report No. 32-127, dated May 28, 1996. (2) Memo from Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc., dated May 3, 1996. Please note that of the 3 samples referred to in the lab report, only lB and 1D were taken from the area below the tank. The "main plume" sample 'has no connection with the tank. Thc information contained in this facsimile message is information protected byattomey/clicn! amt/or attorney work product privilege~, It is intended only for the use of the individual named above andthe p,~vilcges are not waived~oy virtue of this having been sent by Yacsimile. If the person actually receiving this facsinule or any other reader of the facsimile is not tl~e named recipient or ~he emvloyee or agent responsib~l¢ to deliver it to thc · ,named re~eipi.ent, any use dissemination, distribution or copying of the commu~.~cation ~s strictly prohibited. If you nave receive{l this communication in error, please inmaediately notify, tls by telephone and d~stroy the documem or return the original message to us at the ab6ve address via the U. S. PostalServic~. If you have difficulty receiving, please call and ask for Kaye. OUR FAX MACHINE: BROTHER intelliFAX-950M Plain Paper Fax WTBWA~ 07/17/1995 17:06 $05-3960453 GARY M FACHIN PAGE 02 P.O. Box 15212 InternaUonal Rio Rancho, NM 87174 Lubrication and (505) 892-1666 (800) 237-4532 Fuel C:onsul~ants Int. Fax (505) 892-9601 ILFC, 1NC. LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT NO. 32-127 FOR: Law Offices of Gary M. Fackin 110 South Montclair Suite 203 Bakersfield, CA 93309 ANALYSIS REQUESTED: FORENSIC PROJECT ID: Kern High School District PROJECT #: Not Given LOCATION: Bakersfield, CA DATE REC'D: 5/1/96 ILFC BATCH NO: 96014,96015 REPORT DATE: 5/28/96 REVIEWED BY: ~-~fl. ~ ~ GEORGE H. RI[TCHEN, P-RESIDENT NJ CERT. NO.: 71800 87/17/1996 17:86 885-3968453 GARY M FACHIN PAGE 83 ILFC, INC. FoRENsIC ANALYSIS KEPORT NO, 32-127 I. Request On April 24, 1996, ILFC, Inc. received two soil samples from Pacific Gcotechnical Associates for forensic analysis. The samples were sent at thc direction of the Law Offices ofC~ry M, Fachin. An additional sample was received on May 1, 1996. The samples were identified as samples "lB", "1D", and "Main Plume" from Kern I{igh School District's Old Maintenance Yard in Bakersfield, California. ]LFC was requested to identify and, if possible, determine the age ofthe contaminants in the samples. II. Analytical Results A. ¥olalilo Or_~nic Analysis Each sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds by purge and trap GC/MS. The results of'this analysis are summarized below: Concentration (ppm) lB .1D Main Plume MTBE <0.2 <0.2 <0.3 TBA <0,2 <0.2 <0.3 Benzene <0.2 <0.2 3,2 Toluene <0.2 <0.2 1.2 Ethylb~'~zene 0,7 <0.2 42 Xylenes (total) 3.3 <0,2 196 EDC <0.2 <0.2 <0.3 EDB <0.2 <0.2 <0,3 TPH 94 33 7300 (g~oline range) Spectral library searches on unidentified peaks in the sample chromatograms produced the following r~sults: Sample lB - Heavy alkyl ber~zene gasoline constituents, volatile components of light fuel oil Sample 1D - Volatile components of fuel oil 2 07/17/1996 17:06 805-3960453 GARY H FACHIN PAGE 04 Main Plume - Alkyl benzene gasoline components and volatile components of fuel oil B. OC Fingerprint Analysis F/ach sample was analyzed for diesel range and heavier petroleum products by GC/FIX). The sample chromatograms were compared to reference chromatograms of known petroleum products. The results are as follows: TPH Concentration (ppm) 1 B 1 D Main Plume Diesel Range 89 23 83 00 Oil Range 55 44 ND ND -- none detected ? D. Elemental Analysis Each sample was analyzed for organic metals by extracting the samples with kerosene and analyzing the extract by ICP. The results are as follows: Concentration in PPM lB ID Main Plume Aluminum <1 <1 7 Chromium <1 1 1 Copper <1 <1 <1 Iron 3 2 9 Lead 2 1 2 Silicon <1 <1 19 Tin 10 7 5 Boron <1 <1 <1 Zinc <l <l <l Magnesium 1 1 2 Calcium <1 <1 1 Titanium &l <1 <1 Molybdenum 1 1 1 Nickel <1 <1 1 Silver <1 <1 <1 Phosphorous 2 2 1 Manganese < 1 < 1 < 1 Barium <1 <1 <1 D. FTIR Analysis IR spectra for these samples were analyzed to determine whether the fuel oil in these samples was straight-nm indicating a pre-1975 origin or catalytically cracked indi.cating 07/17/1996 17:0~ 805-39~0453 GARY H FACHIN P~GE 05 that the fuel was refined aRer that date. This determination could not be made due to the presence of interfering materials in the samples. E. Accelerated Aging Test This test is used to determine the age of fuel oils by measuring the thermal stability of the fuel, This test could not be performed on these samples due to insufficient contamination in the samples and because of the presence of interfering contaminants in the samples. III. Conclusion Sample lB contained possible aged gasoline, a light fuel oil and a heavier material, possibly a waste oil. Sample 1D contained a light fuel oil and the same heavier material. The Main Plume sample contained gasoline and a light fuel oil. The presence of lead and absence of manganese in these samples is consistent with..contamination by gasoline produced during the late 1970's. 4 07/17/1995 17:05 805-3950453 GARY M FACNIN PAGE 06 MEMO ~hnical Associates, Inc. Date: May 3, 1996 RECEIVED To: Law Offices of Gary M Fachin For: Mr. Wm. Todd Berry From: Brian Hirst GARY M. FACHIN Re: SAMPLE CONDITIONS - Forensic Soil Samples from Dispenser Island Site, Old Maintenance Yard, 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California. Per your request, soil samples contaminated with a gasoline product were collected from excavated material at the Dispenser Island site on April 22, 1996 and sent to two laboratories, This memo describes sampling procedures and site conditions which may be important to the interpretation of the forensic analysis. The soil samples were taken from a stockpile of contaminated soil which had been excavated from beneath a 280 gallon underground storage tank (LIST). Four 2 inch by 6 inch brass sleeves were filled with soils having a strong gasoline odor. The ends of the brass sleeves were covered with laboratory film and plastic caps and then sealed with duct tape. They were placed on ice and sent to the International Lubrication and Fuel Consults Inc. and Friedman & Bruya, Inc. laboratories by overnight service, Each laboratory received two brass sleeves. The following soil and site characteristics apply to these samples: The soil is a conglomeratic sand with estimated porosity greater than 30% The soil samples were taken from a depth of approximately 25 feet below grade. Sand and conglomerate of similar porosity extend to within 10 feet of the surface. From 10 feet below grade to the surface the soils are composed of silty and clayey sand and silt with porosities less than 30°,4. · The depth to perched groundwater is 30 feet. The sample was taken approximately $ feet above groundwater. · Three inches of asphalt paving covered the southern quarter of the excavation but did not extend to the vicinity of the UST. · Biological activity was'not measured. However, no obvious evidence of biological activity.w~s observed in the soil exc~at for surface weeds. 87/17/1995 17:85 885-3958453 GARY H FACHIN PAGE 87 I Fortnmic Soil Sample, - DiSlmnSer Island Site, Old Maintenance Yard May 3, 1996 * The annual rainfall in the area is less than six inches. Annual evaporation for the area is approximately 100 inches. No significant surface water source is identifiable other than planter irrisation along the west side of the excavation, · The perched groundwater is known to fluctuate at least three feet within a year. · The soil temperature is approximately 70° F. * The spill ofgasoline product appears to have occurred over many years. The UST is of riveted construction with lead seals, alloy rivets and brass flanges. A number of mst holes were counted in the top half of the UST, but few if any were noted in the lower half which was relatively fi-cc of mst. It appears that the product leaks were related to these holes and occurred over an extended period of time. The tank has been inactive since at least 1981 when the present owner took possession of the property. Sincerely, Brian M. Hirst CA KG. #4583 pa~,c 2. RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: S/dO Business Name: ~"g-~ ': Conta~ Name: Business Phone: ~ - ~1 F~: Inspe~or's Name: Time of C~I: Date: ~,//~ Time: Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing~ Returned~ Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Location: '~ ~'~)0 ~--~-~d'~ ID# Business Name: Conta~ Name: '~~ ~~ ~ (~~ '~~ Business Phone: Inspemor's Name: Time of C~I: Date: ~//~/~ Time: /~ ~ ~ Min: /'g~ Type of C~I: Incoming [ ] Outgoing ~ Returned [ ] Content of Call: ~s Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: / ~ , ~.~ FAX lPransmi~l B A K E R $ F I F L D Cover Sheet CALIFOIhNIA Bakersfield Fire Dept. Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 FAX No. (805) 326-0576 · Bus No. (805) 326-3979 Today's Date ?/~ / qro Time No. of Pages ¥' COMPANY: ~;~ FAX No:::: L~ q(,, .-ddt3 .... ::~':':::':::: FROM:" , : :': i '' ' ' '" ~'" Bakersfioid Fifo Dopt. · Office of En¥ironmentaiSorvices ... i:: 2:.: :.: : :. :~:: · ,. ::.:-:..: '::' .... .. ~..%..~ ./:.. :. :. ~:: CCR, TITLE 23, D~V~SIO~, CHAPTER 16, UNDERGROUND TANK .... :REGULATIONS removal or subsection (c) for closure.in place. It is,not essential .that all portions of an underground storage tank be permanently'closed ~in the same - manner; however, all closure.actions 'shall be conducted in accordance with this section. Subsections (d)and (e) apply~.to.all unde~ground:storage~tanks subject to permanent.closure. (b) Owners or operators of underground storage tanks subject to .permanent closure shall .comply with applicable provisions of Chapter,6.5 'of ~Division 20 of the .Health and Safety,Code and with the-following requirements: (1) All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed.and .handled-as hazardous wastes or recyclable .materials .in :accordance with Chapter ~6.5 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) If the underground storage tank contained :a hazardous substance that could produce flammable vapors at standard temperature .and pressure, it shall be inerted to levels that shall preclude explosion .or to lower levels as required by the local agency. (3) When an underground storage tank or any part thereof is disposed of, th& owner or operator shall document to the local agency that proper disposal has been completed. This documentation shall .be .submitted within the time frame specified by the local agency. (4) An owner or operator of an underground storage tank or any part thereof that is destined for a specific reuse shall advise the local agency, within the time frame specified by that agency, of: (A) The names of the new owner and new operator of the underground storage tank; (B) The location of intended use; and (C) The nature of intended use. (c) Owners or operators of underground storage tanks subject to permanent closure Where the tanks are approved to be closed in place shall comply with the applicable provisions of Chapters 6.5 and 6.7 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code and with the following requirements: (1) All residual liquid, solids, or sludges shall be removed and handled as a hazardous waste or recyclable materials in accordance with Chapters 6.5 and 6.7 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) If the underground storage tank contained a hazardous substance that could produce flammable vapors at standard temperature and pressure, it shall be inerted to levels that shall preclude explosion or to lower levels as may be required by the local agency. 7-4 I ,~ -z-~ CIT BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPA ~ FIRE SAFETY SERVICES O OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ~~..~.,~%// 1715 CHESTER AVE. ,, BAKERSFIELD, CA · 93301 ~.E. Hu~¥ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ~.B.~'oB,^s. HAZ-MAT COORDINATOR c~o~ ~-~ OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ~,~[ u~s.~ (805) 326-3951 CONDITIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ** Contractors must have the following information on file in order to obtain a permit: 1. Copy of Contractors license 2. General liability policy ? 3. Workmans compensation policy 4. Site safety plan ** Site assessment/sample collection contractor must have a soil sampling and quality control/quality assurance protocol on file. GENERAL 1. A permit application for an UST abandonment shall be filed and applicable fees paid 5 working days prior to the commencement of work. This permit shall remain on-site during the entire removal process. A. Permit is valid for 90 days. 2. Forty-eight hour advance notice shall be given to the Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Specialist to arrange an inspection appointment. 3. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain any permit required by other regulatory agencies (i.e. Building department and Department of Public Works). 4. Tank Closure activities must follow the Uniform Fire Code and. all Federal and Cai-Osha regulations. 5. It is the Contractors responsibility to know and adhere to all applicable laws and regulations regarding the handling, transportation or treatment of hazardous materials. 6. If any contractors other than those listed on permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Specialist. Deviation from the submitted application is not allowed. Iai,,. iCE OF ENVIRONMENTI~II-ERVICES ~.DERGROUND STORAGE TAN~'PROGRAM i//-~- PI:FIMrr APPl. ICA'riON FOR I:II:MOVAL OF AN UNDI:FIGFIOUND $'rOFIAGI: 'lANK SITE INFOI~MATION SITE K~;i.-N h))'qJ'l 5cJlC,C.'i L¥:,i'i.,UJ ADDRESS .q;io¢.~ F--I~¢~'Nv ZIPCODE APN FACILITY NAME~ J);s~l.,<~' P/to,~,~eNd,N,~ yd CROSS STREET J_~ dh TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~¢~-.~-( N)'~.j, .gcJ, cL.i D~'.~'~,~.~' PHONE NO. G:St- .)icc; MAILING ADDRESS , ~,~,;r.)~o ~3t CiTY ~a~[s~,~)([ ZIPCODE CONTEACTOI~ INFOI~MATION COMPANY ~_~tL~i .S~I~'~ iAK PHONE No..'599-C;L'fi(~ ~ LICENSE No.[-7.~'~7~ ADDRESS ~St=,' .Sr~e~,~ ~ud CITY ~b~',id ZlPCODE INSURANCE CARRIER (:o~<~ ~ I~i~st~ /~.:a~,, WORKMENS COMP No. ! PRELIMANAI~Y ASSEMENT INFORMATION COMPANY ~l ~w'~ . iN¢ PHONE No. --~9~)--O '.~ LICENSE No. (~'?$~'? ADDRESS (~Ai_~ ~g'~ew -I~'~,d CITY '~).~f~-~-~,H(I ZIP CODE INSURANCE CARRIER ¢/cM~i-O i~N~Ju~.t~ I~,~ WORKMENS COMP NO. / 1 TANK CLEANING INFORMATION ~0~J4 i'3 ~;~ COMPANY / PHONE No. ADDRESS CI~ ZIP CODE WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ADDRESS CI~ ZiP CODE FACILI~ INDENTIFICATION NUMBER TANK ~ANSPO~TER INFORMATION COMPANY ~l ~c~r~q, Ih~{ .=HONE No..~9.-O~G LICENSENo. ADDRESS g3i~ ~O~ ~cd~ CI~ ~Ke~s~rt/d ZIPCODE TANK DESTINATION Ooide~ A~ ~ietol TANK INFORMATION .... TANK NO. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED THE APPtlCANT HAS RECEIVED. UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATi'ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PENURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A O~/ED ~. ~.~~ ' APPLICANT NAME (PRIN~ THIS APPLIO~TION B~OOM~S A P~RMIT_WH~N_ApPR~V~B. ·. ~ .~ ~, ,~,/~ ~av~ ~ ~ T~ ,,~!~ ~ RAK~R~FI~L~" 07/10/96 13:43 '~805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV *** ACTIVITY REPORT *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 8829 CONNECTION TEL 3960453 CONNECTION ID START TIME 07/10 13:39 USAGE TIME 04'24 PAGES 4 RESULT OK :;'~~_~x Bakersfield Fire Dept ~, PERMIT NO. '~?'~'~' Oi~CE OF ENVIRONMENTAL~E_' RVICES ~ UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANK PROG~M ~ ~ PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE [q[~ ~fqh ~c[oui ~5~tc~ ADDRESS ~iOO C[~8~v ZIPCODE APN' FACILI~ NAM~ ~rs~,'~ ~o~t~e~ ~ CRO~S S~REET ~ ~ TANK OWNER/OPERATOR Ke~N ~ ~ooJ ~,~,,c+ PHONE NO. G31- 31o0 MAILING ADDRESS ~ ~* ~ ~ 5~ CI~ ~a~¢,'~)Ci ZIP CODE CON.ACTOR INFORMATION COMPANY ~v~s, /~c PHONE No. ~9-o~RG LICENSE No. ADDRESS ~i~. S~o~ ~u~ CI~ ~ ZIPCODE I PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION COMPANY L~l ~w~ . iNc PHONE No. ~9-O ~ LICENSE No. ADDRESS GA~ ~ ~.d CI~ ~~,'dc~ ZIP CODE / COMPANY PHONE No. ADD~ESS CI~ ZIP CODE WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ADDRESS CIW ZiP CODE FAClLIW INDENTIFICATION NUMBER TANK ~ANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANY Qu~J ~~~C PHONE No. ~g9-OZ~G LICENSE No. ADDRESS ~31S S~0~ ~ CI~ ~Ke~l'<l~ ZIP CODE TA~K I~FO~MATIO~ TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL STO~ED S~O~eD ~WOUSLY STO~ED THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED. UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT, ATROyED~· APPLICANT N/~ME (PRINT) THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT_WHEN. APPROVED. .... ..,,,.,- .-,, ,cr-.,~c. n^v^~, c Tr~ Tu= ,,CITY C~I= R&KI::I:ISFIELD" Pict Plan must show the following: Roads and alleys 2, .' ~' buildings .... ':." .' .--' ~-~'?: : ~.,~, ~ N 3. location of tanks, piping, and dispensers 4, utilities .. ,5, SCALE · 6. water wells (if on site) 7. any other relevent information KERN HIGH SCHOO~DISTRICT 3100 CHESTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA North Buried Tank Property Boundary Warehouse ] Warehouse Office Building ~ERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENt. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM FACILITY. ~ ~ ~..1~ ADDRESS ~ [C(~ OWNER %<~%1% PERMIT TO OPERATE# CONTRACTOR ~-~F~% CONTACT PERSON LABORATORY ~ ~' # OF SAMPLES TEST METHODOLOGY~k .~ 5.~o~1 PRELIMANARY ASSES~ME~NT' CO .- ~U?F~ CONTACT PERSON CO~ RECIEPT ~'~ LEL% ~ O~% PLOT P~N CONDITION OF ~ANKS ~ 7~" ~K~ ~ ~% ~W~ CONDITION OF PIPING CONDITION OF SOIL DATE INSPECTORS NAME SIGNATURE BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT V/~ /~C BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION -~- ~ 5/ Data APPLICATION Application No. In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, application is made by: e .. d.'[:i:! ':~;: Ndm, of ~:omp~dy ' ' Address to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or creating con- ditions deemed hazardous to Repre~ntative '"~ Perm~ .......... ~.~.~ ........................... By ............ .~.~.(~ ............ ........................................... · GARY J. WICKS ~ 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director , Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 ~ ,~,~.~...~ Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE McCALLEY' ~N_~''/~~~~~::'~!~ Telecopier (805) 86,-3429 ~..~,o~ R ESO U R C E M NT AG EN CY DEPART~ MENTAL PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE ~~~? .~~~?. PERMIT NUMBER A 1183-06 ~'-~.~.. - · OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(fl) NAME/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: Maintenance & Operations Kern High School District McNabb Construction 3100 Chester Ave. 2000 24th Street 4400 ~he Rd. ~213 Bakersfield, CA 93304 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA License ~474331 Phone: (805) 631-3100 Phone: (805) 397-8118 PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES 5uly 5, 1990 1 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE April 5, 1990 LOCATION APPROVED BY ~~/~ Laurel Funk Hazardous Materials Specialist ..................................................................................... POST ON PREMISES .......................................................................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be required by other regulatory agencies prior to bcgin'ning work. (i.e., City Fire and Building Departments) 2. Pcrmittee must notify the Hazardous Materials Management Program at (805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank removal or abandonment in place to arrange for required inspections(s). 3. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook UT- 30. 4. It is the contractor's responsibility to know and adhere to all applicable laws regarding the handling, transportation or treatment of hazardous materials. $. Thc tank removal contractor must have a qualified company employee onsite supervising the tank removal. The employee must have tank removal experience prior to working unsupervised. 6. If any contractors other than those listed on permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the specialist listed on the permit. Deviation from the submitted application is not allowed. 7. Soil Sampling: a. Tank size less than or equal to 1,000 gallons - a minimum of two samples must be retrieved from beneath the eenler of the tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. b. Tank size greater than 1,000 to 10,000 gallons - a minimum, of four samples must be retrieved one-third of thc way in from the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. c. Tank size greater than 10,000 gallons - a minimum of six samples must be retrieved on-fourth of the way in from the ends of each tank and beneath the center of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet. 8. Soil Sampling (piping area): A minimum of two samples must be retrieved at deplhs of approximately Iwo feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and under the dispenser area. PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE pERMIT NUMBER A 1183-06 OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY 9. Soil Sample analysis: a. All soil samples retrieved from beneath gasoline (leaded/unleaded) tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (for gasoline). b. All soil samples retrieved from beneath diesel tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (for diesel) and benzene. c. All soil samples retrieved from beneath waste oil tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for total organic halides, lead, oil and grease. d. All soil samples retrieved from beneath crude oil tanks and appurtenances must be analyzed for oil and grease. 0 e. All soil samples retrieved from bencatit tanks and appurtcnauces that contain unknown substances must be analyzed for a full range of substances that may have been stored within thc tank. f. All soil samples retrieved from beneath tanks and appurtenances that contained furfuryl alcohol resin must be analyzed for phenols, formaldehyde and furfuryl alcohol. 10. ~"l£e following timetable lists pre-and post-tank removal requirements: ACTIVITY DEADLINE Complete permit application At least two weeks prior to closure ' ' submitted to Hazardous Materials Management Program Notification to inspector listed on permit of date Two working days · and time of closure and soil sampling Transportation and tracking forms sent to Hazardous No later than $ working days for trafisportation and 14 working Materials Management Progrzim. All hazardous waste days for the tracking form after tank removal manifests must be signed by the receiver of the hazardous waste Sample analysis to Hazardous Materials Management No later than 3 working days after completion of analysis Program 11. Purging/Inerting Conditions: a. Liquid shall be pumped from tank prior to purging such that less than 8 gallons of liquid remain in tank. (CSH&SC 41700) b. Tank shall be purged through vent pipe discharging at least l0 feet above ground level. (CSH&SC 41700) c. No emission shall result in odors detectable at or beyond property line. (Rule 419) d. No emission shall endanger the health, safety, comfort of repose of any person. (CSH&SC 41700) e. Vent lines shall remain attached to tank until the inspector arrives to authorize removal. RECOMMENDATIONS/GUIDELINES FOR REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS This department is responsible for enforcing the Kern County Ordinance Code, Division 8 and state regulations pertaining to underground storage tanks. Represenlatives from this department respond to job sites during tank removals to ensure that the tanks are safe to remove/close and that the overall job performance is consistent with permit requirements, applicable laws and safety standards. The following guidelines are offered to clarify the interests and expectations for this department. 1. .lob site safety is one of our primary concerns. Excavations are inherently dangerous. It is the contractor's responsibility to know and abide by CAL-OSHA. regulations. The job foreman is responsible for the crew and any subcontractors on the job. Aa a general rule workers are not permitted in improperly sloped excavations or when unsafe conditions exist in the hole. Tools and equipment are to be used only for their designed function. For example, backhoe buckets are never substituted for ladders. 2. Properly licensed contractors are assumed to understand the requirements of the permit issued. The job foreman is responsible for knowing and abiding by the conditions of the permit. Deviation from the permit conditions may result in a stop-work order. 3. Individual contractors will be held responsible for their post-removal paperwork. Tracking forms, hazardous-waste manifests and analyses documentation is necessary for each site in order to close a case file or move it into mitigation. When contractors do not follow through on necessary paperwork, an unmanageable backlog of incomplete cases results. If this continues, processing time for completing new closures will ' funk\ 1183-06.pt a UNDER~ROUND STORAGE TANKS OLD MAINTENANCE YARD FIGURE i UNDEROROUND STORAGE TANKS OLD MAINTENANCE YARD FIGURE 2 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS OLD MAINTENANCE YARD FIGURE 3 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS OLD MAINTENANCE YARD FIGURE 4 GARY J. WICKS 27.')0.M Street, Suite 3iX). · Agency Director Bakerlfleld. CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 ;:~_-~(,*'.* ....... ~, Telephone (805) 861-3636 ..~'l,'~' "' '~:~' ' ~ ' Telecop~er (805) 861-3429 STEVE McCALLEY o,,,~,o, RESOURCE ~~~NT AGENCY D EPART~,~IMENTAL May 24, 1990 Ben Seykora Kern High School District 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 SUBJECT: Location: 3100 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Known As: Kern High School District PERMIT #: 050007 Dear Mr. Seykora: This'letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a responsible party for this property. As a responsible party, you must provide' for all studies and work relating to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the.environment as a result of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum required site work plan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrationS, and a section discussing the answers to commonly asked questions. The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two methods described below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery-under the terms of (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These options only pertain to costs associated with oversight. (Al STATE CONTRACT The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs incurred by the County and the State, pertaining to your site, under the State terms explained below: Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the ' direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the.above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. (B) COUNTY OF KERN LOCAL AGREEMENT OPTION Kern County Environmental Health is providing this option for those who prefer to pay the County directly and avoid the addition of State costs. Prior to the County's performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1o000.00 {one thousand dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must enter into a County agreement, attachment "B". The environmental sensitivity (attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Agreement Option; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Agreement Option, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It is necessary for you to respond, in writing, within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice: either the State contract or the County's Local Agreement Option. If you select the County's Local Agreement, please complete and sign the Local Agreement, (attachment B}, and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Accounting - Local Agreement Option. If you select the State contract, please indicate, in writing, that you have madethis selection and that you have read the above official notification. Failure to respond within ten (10) calendar days to this notice will automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under the terms of the State contract for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Susan Gonzales at {805) 861-3636. ~_~te~_ e McCal l_ey, Director ~fl -- Environmental Health Services D~rtment attachments GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Beker.fleld, CA 93301 (806) 861-3502 ~~__., Telephone (805) 861-3636 STEVE M¢CALLEY ,~~,~ Telecopler (SOS) 861-3429 Olr~tor R ESOU RCE ,~~,ENT AG ENCY OEPAR'I:~~NMENTAL < u nl "F "n o~ o May 24, 1990 m z ~, m Ben Seykora Kern High School District 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, ¢^ 03301 SUBJECT: Location: 3~0_~0__C_b_e.s_.t_e.r__..A.._v_.e~_. Ba_~e.r.~.~ield, CA') Known As: Kern High School ~tric~' ......... ~m~ PERMIT #: 060007 DearMr. Seykora: The intent of this letter is to infom you of the n work required at the property described above. As a r~ leaking underground storage tank, you have previously recel Department notifying you of the required work necessary to the contamination. We are now requesting that this work, done in a timely manner. ~il~ ~ ~ ':ii~: ~ii :.~ In accordance with California Health and Safety Cod, County 0rdinance Code Chapter 8.48, ~he Kern County Depar ~:~:~ Health Services ~equi~es a detemination of t~e ~h~eat Accordingly, you mus~ select, an environmental cont~act~ characterization ~orkplan proposal to ~his 0ffice by July ] must be approved by this Department before any ~ork is ~f you should have any questions ~egard~ng this ma~er, please con~ac~ me immediately at (805) Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cd dolore~\seykora, let C.O.L.T. ALL THE SITES THAT HAVE THE RP AS KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE FOLLOWING APPLIES: JANET SHELL Telephone Number 631-3122 Property Liability - Safety Kern High School District 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Highland High School Kern High School District West High School South High School FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY Acttvtty Date # Of Tanks Comments UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK):/CONTAMINAT!~N SITE REPORT EMERGENCY' ' ' ~ ...~o~j3,~j,.o,~,~.~.,.~.F~_,~.,o~,,l""°"'(~o~)....... ~,-~o~4,'"'"'"¥'¥'"i ............ i"~'.~T~'"' '"'"'"'":'"""D~....... ~.:'"'"'"'""'"" ......... '"'"" "" ................ ~ A~RESS ~ ~ME ~ ~NT~T PE~ON P~NE  ~D~ F~EI~ N~E (F APPLIC~ OPE~TOR ~~ P~NE / ~ CR~S ST~ ~ L~AL AGE~Y AGENCY ~ME ~NTA~ PER~N P~NE m (1) NAME QU~T~ L~T (G~LONS) ~DI~R~ Y ~WDI~D ~ IN~ORY~ROL ~' SUBSURF~EMONITORING.. ~ ~I~E~I~NS ~ ~ .i 5 D~ Y~ ~SDI~HAR~BEENSTOPPED? ~ ~PAIRT~K ~ REPAIRP~ING ~ CH~GEPR~URE ~ ~ ~U~ OF DI~HAR~ CAUSE(8) ~ ~ g T~K~ ~ UN~ . ~ OVERFEL ' ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ SPI~ m m ~E~ONEO~Y ~E~ ONE O~Y ~ ~ NO ACTION TA~N ~ PRELIMINA~SI~E~ME~R~NSUBM~D ~ ~LLUTIONC~C~R~T~N ~ ~ ~ L~ BEI~ ~IRMED ~ PRELIMINA~ SI~ ~E~ME~ UNDERWAY ~ ~ST~NUP MONITORING IN P~G~ ~ REMEDIATION P~ ~ CASE ~OSED (C~UP ~MP~D OR UNNECESSAR~ ~ ~NUP UNDERWAY C~ ~PROPRIA~ ~TION(S) ~ ~CAVA~ & DISPOSE (ED) ~ ~MO~ F~E P~CT (F~ ~ ENH~CED B~ ~G~ATION (1~ ~ ~ c~s~m(c~) ~ EXCAVA~&TREAT(~ ~ ~UP&TREATG~UNDWA~R(G~ ~ REP~SUPPLY(R~ ~ ~ ~NTAI~T BARRIER (CB) ~ ~T~N~QUIRED(NA) ~ T~A~ENTAT~OKUP(HU) ~ ~NT~IL~S) ~ VA~UM~CT~ ~' O~R(O~ ~ ~ .' z $[[11/~' Rcpor,,ng ^/,ency i Repot'inI Pcr,on IPhone Locat;on o( Discharge or Threl~encd Dischzrle Dile ~nd Time or Knotled~e of ~i.charle or Ci;y ~S~ Z~p ~ ~ ' Sec. T R (Ruril locations only) DBA P*opcrty O~ncr Name ~nd Addres~ ot Par~y Responsible (or Discharge. il ~nown: Ar~ T~pe Scene 01__Industrial 04~RuraUAgri. 0l Slate Hwy. 05 Public S/ruclure ~ .O~her Waler Well 13 WoodedArel 02 Commercial 05~Wild Land~ 02 County Rd. ~ Private Slructure l0 _A~rporh'Ra~l~rd 14 .Oe~erl ~Residen~;al 03~icy Rd. 07 Canal/Walcrway I[ .Emply Lei ~O~her; *peci~ ~C~OC ... 04.. Pti?lc Rd. 08 Dome~li¢ Water Well 12 _La,e/Pond l&~Oil ~ield Source o( Release ~ircums~aflces o( Release Cause o( Release 01 Oil Refine~ Ol~While Bean8 Menu[secured Il Durln8 Container or Ol ..Equipmenl Failure 02~Chem. ~anu[aclurer 02~While in Storale eonduil Repair 02 .Vandalism 03 Mi~. Fixed Facili~ 03 DurinI Normal End Use 12 Illegal Di*po~al 03 Act of Nature 04~Mo~or Vehicle 04 While Bean8 Loaded ~ ~reatened Release 04 Accidenl 0S~riin 0S While in Transit Onl~ No Discharge OS Ille~al Di/polll ~A;rcrafl ~ While Vehicle Parked 97 Release or Incidenl 98~Unknown 07 Pipeline 07 During Vehicle Accidenl Mid,aced at Time ~ Other: 08~Underground Tank 08 Durin8 Fire/Explosion of Repo~ ~Unkno~e ~ .During Air Crash 98 ~nknown ~Otber: ~0 While Abandoned ~ Other: Lisl the One, Two, or Three Most SiAnificsn! Subslances DischarRcd or Threalcncd to be Di$chirAed: Chem. Name/Major Component: ~"/d~ 0 f--~'/'~ ~ ConccntraHon Amount I~ Risk Amount Relea~ed Commoe Name: Chemical Hazard: _Toxic Flammable ~Pure __Solid (l) ~q~ ~ ti) ti) _. _Reactive Corrosive Radloac~ive ~Wasle ~Oaa (~) (3). (3) Do~ ID Humber: . ~em. Name/Major Componenl: Important Additional Commcnt~/Deliil~: (Ule Revere if Needed) Common Name: Reacllve Corrosive R Idloictive Dot' ID Number: Chem. Name/Mawr Component: Common Hazard:~o~k Flamma~e ~Pure ~Solid ~Reaclive ...Corrosive ~Mi~ ~Liq. De~ ID Number: Health and Envlronmcntal eontamin~lion: Indicate Actual ('A°) ar Potential ('P') Foe Applicable hem~ Chem I Cbem 2 Chem 3 Ol~Air 02__Canal/'Waterway Internal Use Onl~ 03~La~e/Pond ~Soil ~ Id~nti~calion ~ 0S~erop, ~__Livc*lock lnvesli~alion Referral Made To~ 07~Wildlife ~Wooded Area ~ Heahb Risk ~lsessmenl Ranking:. ~Deserl lO__Btu,blind -- Information Phoned In? Y N If yes, dice: 11~Pood~uffl Taken 12~roundwaler ~ Date Reeo, Received by Environmental Heahb Dep~ 13~Dwelling Computer Input (Check) Clerk's Initials 14~Humana Date of Notification of Health O~cer BOS~ ~Olher: . .. Date of Noti~cation of Media LABORATORIES, INC. P~RO~EUN J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 933~ "~NE 327-4911 , 'Purgeable Aromatics (SO~L) McNabb Const?uction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-1 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Under Tank 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received 8 Lab: Completed: 12 -Apr- 90 12 -Ap r- 90 24 -Apr-90 Minimum Rep°rting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 0.27 0.2 Toluene ug/g 3.1 0.2 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 6.5 0.2 p-Xylene ug/g 10 0.2 m-Xylene ug/g 24 0.2 o-Xy 1 ene ug/g 13 0.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 470 10 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. %102 LABORATO RIF , INC. i~ETROL~U¥ . J.J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-2 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Under Tank 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 0.70 0.4 Toluene ug/g 20 0.4 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 43 0.4 p-Xylene ug/g 73 0.4 m-Xylene ug/g 180 0.4 o-Xylene ug/g 87 0.4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 3,300 10 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituentS by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEU# J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (S.OIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-3 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and 0 Piping 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California .D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 Analyst LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEU¥ J' J' EGUN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics' (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-4 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and 0 Piping 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum. Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected' 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 LABORATORIES, INC. J. J. EGI.IH, FIEG. CHEM. ENGR. PETROLEUM 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 9.6-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-5 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and 0 Dispenser 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum' Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02. p-Xylene ug/g none detected ~0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 ~/J~. ~.' E~ £n' ~ ¥ Analyst ,---,-,-, LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLE/,/¥ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. EHGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-.4911 · Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-6 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Dispenser 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: california D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 This form is to be returned to the Kern County Health Department ~lthin_ 1--4 ... ~ of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling facility. The holder of the permit with number noted above Is responsible for insuring that this form is completed and returned· Section _~ - To be filled out ~ank removal contractor: Ta~ "Decontaatnatlon' Contracto~ X Authorized representative of contractor certifies 'by signing belo. that tank(s) have been decont~inated la accordance ~lth gera County Bealt~ Department requirements. Section 3 -~T° ~be _filled __out and_ :signed_ ~ __an authorized _representative of the ' treatment., , , ~~,~~--°r dtspo~f.~:!lity accepting,ank(s):: . _ Recetved f ~ Date Tanks ~~ ~--~ NO. of Tanks (Authorized Representative) * * * ~ILIN6 INSTRUCT'IONS: Fold tn half and staple. · Ststs of C.lifomle---He&flh and WeHare Agency ~ Se8 Instructions on B~ec. lmdp~ Page 6 Oe~ertmem of Hearth Services' Fon~ Apl~'oved OMB No. 2050--0039 (Expires 9-30'9w and Front of Toxic Subalaflces Control Division Pl~,ase )riel or type. (Form designed for use o~ elite ~;itch typewriter). Sacramento. California ~i ~ UNIFORM HAZARDOUS t. ~e. nerator's US EPA ID No. ' , Manifest '2. Page 1 ..l~;:nf0fm;,fl~.'~..the' ~haded areas. 3. Generator's N~me apd_~aili_no Add~ j ~..~,.._/.~ ;~.~ A. StMe.,Miaife~t Oocf )~ 5. TransD~rter I Company Name 8./.~ US EPA ID Number C. _~tat, Tr. ~t' ~ 7. Transporter 2 Coal"any Name 8. US EPA ID Number E. State Tr~l~ef"e ID -~- 9. ~gnated Facility Name and Site Address _.JO. US EPA ID Number G. Slate Facility's ID ' 12. Containers 13. Total 14. . . L 11. US DOT Description (Including Prope~ Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quantity Unit . Waste No.  No. Type Wt / Vol a. N E ~. ' / State A EPA/OIhe~ R c. 8tetlt . . J. Additional Descriptions fcr Materials Lialed Above ,, , .. ,: :,. K. Handling Codes fcr Waatel U~ted Above ,. [ I GENERATOR'S CERTIFICA'r]ON: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name ~ , and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable intemationel and i ; national government regulations. , if I am s large quantity generatoL I certi~ thM I ha~e s program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree t have deten~ined :~ j to be e(~onomically practicable and that { have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future th;eat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a small quantity .~e~era!or, ! have made -~ good ;aii'h el;orr to mi~;m;ze my waa;e generation and selecl the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. T 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials -/,~ R (~ 18. Transporter 2 .Acknowledgement of Receipl ot Materials ~ Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year E 19. Discrepancy Indication Space F A C I L I 20. Facility Owner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in~ 19. T Printej;L~Typed Name __ __ I Sig~l~'e '"- j/~~ Month Day Year DHS 8022 A (1/88) DO Not Write Below This Line EPA 8700--22 (Rev. 9-88) Previous editions are obsolete. White: TSDF SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAY5 To'. P.O. Box 3000, $ocromenfo, CA R E C'. ET.. ]: P T PAGE 1 04/03/90 ........... Invoice Nbr, 1 3'1639' 10:.,58 ,~m KERN COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 2700 'M' ~reet 8.8ker'sfield, ¢A 93301 Type o¢ Onden ~ (805) R61-2615 CASH REG],..TER MC NABB CONSTRUCTION Customer P,O ~ J W~n 8y JOrder Dele J Shffp DaTe Via J Terms H0403g0-2 J L,.,ID J 04/03/90 J 04/03/90 J NT I I ! I Line Desoript'ion Quantity Price L.Jni~ g~sc Tot~] '1 TANK PLAN CHECK 6 100,00 E 600.00 170A Order Tota] 600,00 Amount Due 600.00 P~yment M~da By Check 600,00 THANK YOLI! T~K- FACILITY ~NUAL ,REPORT ~aclltty '~,~_~. ~_~~ Peemlt #~:2~:7_.~t~.~onth/¥r' .'~://'l~r~ ' '"'' ~, 1. I have not done an~ najor nod~l~ns to t~ factltt~ during, the last 12 months.. . ' 'Signature Note: .Ail Sajor sodtflcatlo~qutre ~P~rstt to C~ru~ fros the Per~itttng Authorl~ . . 2. I have done ~ajor aodtfications for ~hich I obtained Perslt(s)'to . Construct fros Per~itttng Authority .. Signature Per, it to Construct S Date 3. Repair and ~atntenance Sugary Attach a sugary of all: -- Routine and requlred maintenance done to this facility's tank, piping, and ~onitoring equipment. --Repair of submerged pu~ps or suction pumps. --Replacement of flo~-~estricting leak detectors ~i~h same. --Repair/replacement of dispensers, meters, or nozzles. --Repair of electronic leak detection components, or ~eplacesent with s~e. -- Installation of ball float valves. -- Installation or repair of vapor recovery/vent lines. Include the date of each repair or ~aintenance activity. NOTE: All repairs or replacements in response to a leak require a Persit to Construct fro~ the Per~itting Authority as do all other sodlftcatlons to tanks, piping or monitoring equipment not listed here. 4. Fuel Changes - Allo~ed for ~otor. Vehicle Fuel tanks 0nl~. List all fuel storage changes in tanks, noting: Date(s), tank number(s), ne~ fuel(s) stored. 5. Inventory control monitoring is required for this facility on the Permit to Operate, and I have not exceeded any reportable limits as listed in the appropriate inventory control monitoring handbook during the last t,elve mo~t a~p~, disreg, ard). 6. l~:~sde~tl y:.i SASnU~aary ~f~/ ~ .. a n nual Trend"A~alysts Summary for the last 12 periods. 7. Meter Calibration Check Form Please attach current, completed Meter Calibration Check Form ~NUAL TREND ANALYS I S S UI~II~I/~RY PERIOD 1: Total Minuses This P od (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 2: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 3: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) ACtion Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 4: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) _3~ Action Number for this Period (Line 4) ~ ~ PERIOD 5: Total Minuses This PeriOd (Line 3) ~ Action Number for this Period (Line 4) ~- PERIOD 6: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) ~/~/ Action Number for thls Period {Llne 4) ~/g7/ PERIOD.?: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action NUmber for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 8: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 9: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) .. qUARTER 4 TIME PERIOD: ~' to PERIOD 10: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number for thls Period (Line 4) PERIOD 11: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 12: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) Action Number .for this Period (Line 4) I hereby certlfy this is a true and accurate report. Note: I. All meters must have calibration checks a minimum of twice a year, which Include checks done by the Depactment of 'Weights and Neasures~ :. Before sis'trinE calibration runs. wet the. calibration can with product-and return product to storage. ' 3. Run S gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. ~ote gallons and cubic Inches dra~n, and return product to storage. 4. Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open into th~ can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and.return product to storage. · 5. After all product for one calibration check Is returned to storage, remember " to record-the volume returned to storage In column 9 of the Inventory Recording Sheet. O. Ir the volume measured in m S-gallon calibration .can is more than 6 cubic inches above or below the-5-gallon =ark, the meter requires calibratio~ by registered device repairman. ' or]Tank ·/ Fast ~1o~ Date/Time Hose Pump · ct · Slow ~1o~. Vo~me Returned Calibrationj Device.Repairman Date of Owner or Operator $1gnatu Calibrator's S i~nature: Registration SUBNET A' COPY OF THIS PORN WITH ANNuA~ REPORT. · Note: I. All meters ·must have calibration checks a minimum of twice a year, which may ~ include checks done by the Department of Weights and Measures1 2. Before starting calibration runs, wet the~ calibration can with product and. return product to storage. 3. Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. ' 4. Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open into t~e can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 5. After all product for one calibration check is returned to.storage, remember to record the volume returned to storage in column 9 of the Inventory Recording Sheet{' 6. If the volume measured in a 5-gallon calibration can is more than 6~ cubic inches above or below the 5-gallon mark, the meter requires calibration by a registered device repairman. DatejTimh Hose' o--~Tank #/l' Fhat Flow' I ' 'StoW. Flow Vol"nme ReturnedlCalibratton Device Repairman .Date of Pump #{Product] 5-Gallon Draft{ 5-Gallon Draft to Storage I Required? Used for Calibration ] _j ~ {/O; ts CU. Inches{Gals{Cu. Inches Gallons { Yes No Calibration ..'.: Owner or Operator 8ignat~~~, //--/-fYy; ..- '' Calibrator's Signature. /~~ -~_l/- ~>J~ Registration '20 ~ 0 . f' ' . V ~~ - - MEMBER PEI 1450 W. McCOY SUITE A -~ '. SANTA MARIA. CA. 93455 c~g'UM EI~JIPMENTIN~k~ ':' 1805) 928-1135 AUTOMOTIVE - INDUSTRIAL . . ,' PETROLEUM ' · ' , 'i "" 2080 SOUTH UNION MAILING ADDRESS EQUIPMENT BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93307 · PHONE 834-11.00 P.O. BOX 640 INSTALLATION - MAINTENANCE /.' "'i, CALIF. CONTRACTORS LIC. # 294074 BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93302 · 'LATTN'-'BEN SEYKGRA .. ]BAI\EI-~SFIEL[! ..,.,,,., ... CA '93301- WAREHOUSE IJO}"~K PERFORHED-CHECKEI) FUEL F'UMP FOR CALIBRATION--UNABL..E TO. .iALIBRATE'-METER NO GOOD. NOTIFIED BEN SECORA OF NEED TO RF" :'L. ACF: MEliOR--DECLINED AT,,T[HIB TIME--LOBATION WILL BE CLOSING LABOR: 1.50 ,15 ,, 0 PLEASE'PAY FROM THIS INVOICE ".. TERMS: NET 30 DAYS '~Z?~'; : .... ORIGINAL Environment~ ~n~itivity 4 ' ppectioo Time UNDERGROUND HAZ~/~RDOUS SUBST~e~qCE STORAGE FACILITY * INSPECTION REPORT Facility Name -- ' ~' Address No. of Tanks Is Information on Permit/Application Correct? Yes ~ No ~ Permit Posted? Yes ~ No _ Type of Inspection: Routine ~' Complaint Reinspectlon ITEM VIOLATIONS NOTED 1. Primary Containment Monitoring: a. Intercepting and Directing System b. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring c. Modified Inventory Control Monitoring d. In-Tank Level Sensing Device e. Groundwater Monitoring f, Vadose Zone Monitoring 2. Secondary Containment Monitoring: a. Liner b. Double-Walled Tank c. Vault 3. Piping Monitoring a. Pressurized b. Suction c. Gravity 4. Overfill Protection 5. Tightness Testing 6. New Construction/Modification 7. Closure/Abandonment 8. Unauthorized Release 9. Maintenance. General Safety and Operating Condition of Facility Comments/Recommendations: Reinspection scheduled? __ Yes __ No Approximate Relnspection Date INSPECTOR: REPORT RECEIVED BY: .' :.' Telem(8OB)881-3836~::57',::':':::':~' ,i:.:,'~ :*.;).;,i.::~}'~::'/'~,'_, ENVIRONMEN'~. L-HEALTH,DIVI,~Oi~,~'~,i.':~ O .,., ~ · :','~,,, . '-/ , .-. . ~ .- . .,. ,, ~. ., .?,.,.:. . .,~. ,;~,,,~,. :: ,,,:. ,., ,-.. :.~,.- ... UNDEROROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ~~.~ ".":"'? '-."':~ STORAGE FACILITY ~ ':'"'' NU)IBER . ~ '" ' '-- FACILITY: I O~NER: "." - ~,,' ..... ~ '-. DISTRICT 1~1 & 0 WAREHOUSE I KERN HIGH SCtlO0~;:.D;i'.S;~RICT' ""' 3100 CltESTER AVEN~E t 2000 BAKERSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA ~ '933.01 ........ TANK # AGE.(IN YRS)_ SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED 'P~'PIN'G'? "' 8 UNK MVF 2 NO ...... ~.. , ,. :...:.- ..'y,::,(. '..):5-.,,:~ ,..,, ..:~:.::.:.~ '- ..... :'~'.', .':',':b:- "~': '-" '"" NOTE: ALL INTERI[,i REQUIREIV[ENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERHIT. T. IN.G :. AUTHORITY ]V[UST BE [,lET DURING TIlE TERN OF TtlIS .PI~RIV[I~.'_~.,:,.;,~,.'.:';.;.C:' · · ,: -:.:... .'.." ..- ', . :,', . NON--TI~'/kNSFIEI:~,/~BLE * ~=* POST ON PR.'~'..IV[T SIllS ~t .' .',' :.?T -: .- . '- . ·. +,.,~,... ,. ,..._' :. o, ,., ...:,- . . · . - ,,~..'.'~f"~ ,.. · ..' .. ,..,.-: , _.-:~.: .' . , '. DA~E PEi~4IT C'ED~K LIST F~T~: ""' "':'::'" :-' /::"'" "'"'" Health Oepartment e Pe[mit Kern County Division or Environmental Health-- Application DaC~~ 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93]05 APPLICATION .FOR PERMIT q~) OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Application (check): [2]New Facility DModification of Facility [~Existing Facility ['~7~ansfer of Ownership ¢ A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days ~.~. ~'~i,/Co~,~ . Nights ~fpe of Business (check): [2]Gasoline Station f'lOther (describe) Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [2]Yes G~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for ~gricultural Purposes? [-]Yes ~No Facility Address ~ ~lC,~y-~j~ ;q&,~ Nearest Cross St. ~ $7' T R SEC (Rural Locations Cnly) Address o- ~ % Zip ~fe I Telephone ~2?- Operator Contact Person Addr ess Zip Telephone B. 'Water to Facility Provided by ~)/f. G,j~7~ ~'~,,~ Depth to' Groundwater Soil Characteristics at Facility ~'~ Basis for Soil Type.and Grour~water Depth Determinations ~;.$. £o;& ~aw;. C. Contractor CA Contractor' s License No. Addr ess Zip Telephone Proposed 'Starting Date Proposed Ccmpletion Worker's Ccmpensation Certification ~ InsUrer D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly .Describe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): 'Tank ~ ~aste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded ~ Premium Diesel %~aste fuel -6TI- Ch~anical C~po,~ttion of l~aterials Stored (not necesssry for ~otor Yehicle fuels) 'lank ~ Chemical Stored {non-commercial name) ~ ! {ill knob,m) Chemical Pr~t. ou~ly Stor~:l ( if different) G. Transfer of Ownershi~ Date of %Yansfer Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept fully all obligations of Permit No. __ issued to · I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~a~dergro4Jnd storage facility upon receiving this c~mpleted form. ~is form has been c~mpleted under.penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowlec~:je is true and correct. Signature ~ Title ~. Date ,-~'- ~')~ TANK '~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK} FO--R'"EACH SECTIOn, CHECK ALt. APPP. OPRIATE BOXES ~. 1. Tank is: []Vaulted ['~Non-Vaulted [~]Double-Wall ~Single-Wall 2. ~ Material ~C.Rrbon Steel [] Stainless ~Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel ~'Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze ['lUnknow~ [] Other (describe) 3. primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. Tank S_econdary Containment []Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner [2] Lined Vault [~None [] Other (describe): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining [2]Rubber [qAlkyd [-]E~oxy []Phenolic []Glass [~]Clay ~Unlinad [qUnknom [']Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection '--]~G~lvanized "~ass-Clad ' []Polyethylene Wrap [2]Vinyl Wrapping []Tar or Asphalt ~lUnknown []None []Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~None [2]Impressed Current System ['lSacrifi'cial Anode System De~-ribe System & Equipment: ' 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and.Interception a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitoring' Well(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring ~ell(s) []U-Tube Without Liner ~[]U-Tube with Ccmpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring Well(s)* Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor~ [] Conductivity Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular .Space of Double Wall Tank- [-] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From-U-Tube,' Monitoring~ ~ell: or Annulari~Spa. ce [~Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightness Testi~I [] None [] Unknown [] Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized PiPing' ~] Monitoring Strap with Raceway [] Sealed Concrete Raceway []Half-Cut C~mpatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~ay [] Unknown [] etcher *Describe Make & Model: 8.Tank Tightness ' ]~is Tank Been Tightness Tested? [-]Yes UNo ~Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing ' Cc~pany 9. Tank ~ ' Tank Repaired? []Yes [~No []Unknown Date(s) of Repai~(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection ~Operator FillS, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level ~Tape Float Gauge [2]Float Vent Valves [-]Auto Shut- Off Controls []Capacitance Sensor [qSealed Fill Box [~]None [-]Unknown []Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Pipzng a. Underground Piping: [~Yes [2]No []Unknown Material Th!ckness (~nches) Diameter Manufacturer []Pressure ~Suct'ton []Gravity Approximate Lengt~ o'f Pfpe b~ Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : ~Galvanized [2]Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current []Sacrificial Az~x~e []Polyethylene Wrap [-]Electrical Isolation [']Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or A~lalt ~Unknown []None []Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment: PERMIT CHECKLIST This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and return to KCtlD in the self-addressed envelope provided within 30 days of receipt. Check: Yes No A. The packet I received contained: 1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phas~ I Interim Permit Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement Between Owner and Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-3941), Explanation of Substance Codes, Equipment Lists and Return Envelope. / 2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10. -7 3) The Following Forms: .a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Recording Sheet with summary on reverse c) Trend Analysis Worksheet --V/ 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and find owner's name and address., facility name and address, operator's name and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C. I have the following g~uired equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): J/ 1) Acceptable gauging instrument ~/' 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) v/ 3) Water-finding paste D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner 'and O~erator and hereby state that the owner of this facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have had calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman .if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook). __ G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures described in Handbook #UT-lO. Oate Started ~-z-Z/-~f-~ ~ ~_~ ~ Date: ~-- / ~-- ~?~' ~./.,... TANK FACILITY ANNUAL REPORT' 1. I have not done any major modifications to this facility during the Iasc 12 sonths. · ~_ _ ~ . ' Signature ~J~ _. Note,' All major modificat~s~s~, equire a Permit t~Construct~ from the Permitting Author. ... 2., I have done major modiflcatious for which I obtained Permit(s) to Construct from Permitting Authortt~ Signature ..~ Permit to Construct ~ Date ;i;'.a.. Rapair and ~aintenance Su~ar~ at~ach a sugary of all: -- Routine and required maintenance done to this facility's tank, piping, and monitoring equipment. ... -- Repair of submerged pumps or ~uction p~ps. -- Replacement of flow-~est~ictinK leak detectors ~ith same' -- Repalr/replace~ent of dispenSer~, ~eters, or nozzles. -- Repair of electronic leak detection components, or replacement -- Installation of ball float valves. -- Installation or repai~ of vapo~ ~ecovery/vent lines. Include the date of each repair o~ maintenance activity. NOTE: ~11 ~epairs or replacements in response to a le~ require a Permit to Construct fro~ the Permittin~ Authority as do all other ~odifications to tanks, piping or ~oniloring equipment not listed here. 4. Fuel Chan~es - Allo~ed for ~otor Vehicle Fuel tanks 0nly. .. ~lst all fuel storage chan~es i~ tanks, noting: Date(s), ta~ number(s), new fuel(s) stored. 5. Inventory control monitoring is required for this facility on the ' Permit to Operate, and [ have n~'_~t exceeded any reportable limits as listed in the appropriate inventory control monitoring handbook during the last twelve months (if not applicab~.~disregard). Stgna ' ' 6. "trend Analysis Summary Please attach Annual Trend Analysis Summary for the last 12 periods. 7. f4eter Calibration Check Form Please attach current, completed ~eter Calibration Check Form ANNUAL TREND ANALYS I $ S UlVllW_~%RY PERIOD 1: Total ~inuses T Period (Line 3) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) -- j - PgRIOD 2: Total ~inuses This Period (Line 3) ~' . .~. letion ~u~ber for ~his Period (hine . '"' PERIOD 4: Total Minuses Th~s ~riod (Line 3} · '" Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 5: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) .[..'. Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 6: Total Minuses This Period (Line ~) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) . QUOTER 8 TIME PERIOD: to _ P~RIOD 7: Total ~inuses Thi~ Period {~ine 8) Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 8: Total Minuses This period (Line 3) /~ · Action Number for this Period (Line 4) PERIOD 9: Total Hinuses This Period (Line S) /~ / Action Number for this Period (Line 4) /~ ' PERIOD 10: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) . Action Number for this Period (Line 4) /~ PERIOD 11: Total ~inuses This Period (Line ~) ~etion ~u~ber for th~s Period (~ine ~':' PERIOD 12: Total ~inuses This Period (Line 3) /~ ~-" ~ction Number for this Period (Line 4) ~ .... I hereb~ eer~f~ this is a true and accurate report. February 24, !987 · To: Kern county Health Department Attn: Underground Tank Section From: Joe Burciaga Kern High School District RE : W~a. TER IN UNDERG-ROUND FUlfiL TANK On Tuesday morning, 1,I~9/88, after a rainy three-day holiday week-- end, I gauged our 2,000 gal. underground M.V.F. tank for water. !/~, I noted that the measuring stick indlca'~ed ,~ of water in the tank. I called our fuel sumplier, Sullivans Petroleum Co., and they ~ent a man who suctionea the water out with a portable pump. Thereafter, I gauged for water every day for a week without any traces of water showing on measuring stick. I believe that the heavy rainfall formed a water puddle over a loosely tightened cap on fill pipe, allowing the water to seep into the tank. Bill Scheide, Health Dept. advised me to report this occurrance on the tank facility annual report. . '. ..- .... ~, 3030 ~.J ., '.:,, '-': '.'. B~SFi~D ~ .~.~ O~L~ ' -....,'~ ,~...-(., { .--~: ,) ,('. , ,. .. D.~o~h 3000 4000 ~nches ~~ <::al~ Gal... Gal. ' L~ches . ~ Gal.__~../ Gal. "' 39" .... 15 22 29 ~ ~ 0.~(~ 1596 3" 27 '41 53 40" 1104 1649 2150 4" 1'.2 62 C;L 41" l I =o ~ ¢ uO 5" q8 87 ~' 113 42" 1173 5" 76 ' 114 '1 AS 43" 1506 i802 ..... *" .... ~.~.'> 7" 96 143 185 Z~' 1242 ! 854 S" 117 174 _.. 9'35 AS". ~,-/o 9~' _,.~., ~ nn,'. 243~ ,..u ~ 46" l ¢09 1955 2549 1 O" i62 2~1 ~4-"~ ' 2~7" ~ ~' ..... 2002 ~ lob 277 360 48" t377 2056 2679 l~" 210 . 314 409 49" !410 21'05 ~7'"" ~ ~ 50" "~' ' 13" 236 ~5- 459 1442 .. 2154 14" 263 391 510 51" 1474 o,,n~ ' ~" 290 432 564 52" ~ 16" 318 474 6i8 53" 1530 2299 2996 !7" 246 516 673 54" 1571 2344, 3056 Lg" '"~ ' == .... 55" .~'o ~u~ 732 1602 2391 3116 !9'r'' 437 607 79~ 56" t6~3 ' ' '"' 20" 4.36 650 847 57" 1663 24G2 5236 21" 467 696 907 58" 1692 $~o~... ,.~ 3292 or,, 498 742 963 59" 1723 2570 23" 530 790 1030 dO" 1751 2612 3406 24" 562 838 ~ re'v, 51" 1777 2652 ' ':'/, 25" ~195 887 1133 62" 1810 2701 3521 ~" r'27 935 [ 1219 63" '~°1 ...... ....... ~u~= 272! ~Su.'. 27" ~61 985 J ~.. 2n4 ~ ~/-", 1056 ~769 o ~, ,-. ~'>2" ' ,694 !035 t 13J9 dS" =u~! o"~0~-' ~ "< ':" .--'>9" 727 1084 t ~4,.~>., ' 66" i900 ".:.,~¢.', r~u'~ .;3~7' ' ' )" 7~' 1135 1479 '" -, ;~7 1~'~7 23, 5 31" ';. 95 1185 i 5..v7 68" 1943 2D06 ': ')" ~'..:0 123~ 16" o 69" ~ ..... ~:. 1~o~ 2936 33~: g64 '~ o~12 1678 70" !9~7 '~;8/:- 3 "~;~;~- :" ,,~'~ i3 8 1745 71.." ;u~'""'"' ~ ..,;>$9'~,. 3? ~ ' ':"' ' ...... " 72" :, ~, zorn) 1013 2020 ::,'d]..~ '.~.:' · ":" iO!5, 1513 '~ g'/2 74" ..0,.,-," ..~, 3(':/..~ 75" .... = '" ~ ~ 2054 3064 Note:' 1.All meters must have calibration checks a minimum o[ twice a year. which may include checks done by the Department of Weights and Measures. 2.Before starting calibration runs, wet the~ calibration can with product and return product to storage. 3.Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open .into the can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 4.Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open into t~ can. Note gallons and cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage. 5. After all product for one calibration check is returned to storage, remember to record the volume returned to storage in column 9 of the Inventory Recording Sheet. 6. If the volume measured in a §-gallon calibration can is more than 6 cubic inches above or below the 5-gallon mark, the meter requires calibratio-'n by a registered device repairm~n. Date/Time Hose or Tank ~/[ Fast Flow Slow Flow VolUme Returned{Calibration{ Device Repairman Date of Pump # Productl 5-Gallon Draft 5-Gallon Draft to Storage { Required? [ Used for lalibration IOals{Cu. Inches Ga!,s Cu. Inches Gallons { Yes N I Calibration Owner or Operator Sign . Calibrator's StMnature ~j Registration SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS FORM WITil ANNUAL REPORT. CDIdPUTER CHANGE O C. AL,~A?IO. Record o! Coml~er Change, Meter Change, or Calibra~'on : ~ ME~R C~ANGE ~ W/M NOTIFIED I ' " ] ~"" ' ~ IS[ATI~ ~. DATE " lmS~ATCH NO. "" ~o ~o~ I~ CALIBRATION ~N~ . G~LONS FAST . ] S[~ FAST ~5LOW Pump/t TOTAL ........ ~ ......................................... ,. AND MOOEL ]S~IAL NUMBER CALIBRATION CHECKED A~JU~TE~ ~O I ~ONE v FINISH TOTAL IZER Pump ~ TOTAL ~o.~ I .u..--.., ..~ .OOEL lS..,.~ .u.~. CAUBR;TION . . CHECKED ADJU~ rED 1'0 FINISH TOTALIZER Pump ~ TOTAL CHECKED · ADJUSTED TO TOTALIZER FINISH RETURNED TO STORAO~ CALIBRATION _ ._ CHECKED ADJUSTEO TO TOTALIZER FINISH · Pump ~'1 TOTAL ,o s,o.,o~ - TUH~ I ! OgO 3000 4500 D2p 2h 2000 4000 dal ~al. Ga! ' - -~-'~ ~ -' Gal. ~ 8 iO 33" 1034 i544 20i4, ~..~ ~: 22 29 39" ~0~8 1596 2~37, vT 41 53 40" 1104 ' 1649 2150 v2 62 · ?: 41" I1~ :~uO ~.~8 87 !13 .;~2". zl~ '" · ....: ~O' ' 4~'"'" ~ ~ !17 174. 225 45" 1276 1904 2433 138 206 ,:.u~ .... 4~S" !a09' ~' 1955 2549 i 62 241 S!4 47" 1341 ~00~'~ ' " Z6i 0 i86 277 ~0 48" !377 2056 2579 210 .... , 314 409 49" 14!0 21'05 236 352 459 50" 1442 2154 2g07 '"" '51" o,- .,.~ ~91 510 ~474 290 432 ':~" 52" 1508 2250 '2~'34 ........ 53" .{IS 474 Oi.~ 1530 ~,,~'~'~v~ ::46 516 673 54" i571 2344 3056 376 561' 732 55" 1602 2391 487 -,c,'~ 56" 607 : .u= !(~3 2438 3'177 436 650 ~47 57" 1663' 24oz z:67 696 907 58" 1592 ~'~ 498 X'SO 790 z ~o0 ~O" 1751 . ~O1. ~' '" ~'~ ": ~.62 838 ; 099 61" 1777:<? 2652 ~ · ,- f95 087 i.~J3 62" 1210."' 2701 , ~ z~' 2721 :'~2/ 935 1219 63" ~o~ o~.~"~ .... ,:' b:. 985 ~ o?4 6'4" ~' ' '" ..-~ Io~o 2769 ~'.qA .... 1035 ~ 349 dS" !'SS! . 2800 ,27 t~4 ~,:..~ ~6" t950 2837 .) ~:~,' 7~2 * 1125 i(,79 .... ' '~ o ~ · _:,.~/ 2875 35:47 liu~ '; :~,','/ o~" 1945 2906 "" ..... ,,.~ ~.. ~ ,,, !937 5:~:54 CgL] '?', ~;~o 7'i ,, I '>,:~a~ ~;. ~?' I/R~i i~.]O 73" 2033 3033 ';, 0'~ '; t~13 1972 74" gO,:,.4 , ?"9 i ...... J 75" ' ' ': '= ..... ,~ ~ 5'~ 'V054 3064 ? * ~ ~ .. ~" : ": ~.; · · "t"~t.- ~ / ' "3 } ...1 ~, ~.. ... · IML , i~'iTM~m:. _,IIi~IiHIlII ~~ ~'~' i . ge, Meier Change, or Calibration ~ECKED ADJUSTED TO  ~ F~T SLow READINGS ~ o ~0~ S~ NU~aE~ .. CALIBRATION '-'~: ~: ~/" ~': ':::/~'' :' "'""' ';' ~ CHECKED - * ~JUSTE~ TO TOTALIZER FINISH , .. :: ~ .. .... . . .. .~,, .. , .-~ ~o~, Pump .~ TOTAL ~.~o.~.~,~..~o,o ~.~ CALIBRATION CHECKED - I ADJUSTEU FINISH t · , TOTAM~E~ REDOINGS ST~T ' Ov~s O NO ~ TOTAL ' I~°"~"' '~"'u '° ~'''"''~ - " k~ CHECK EU AOJUSI ED TO ~'":'":' ~--- ,Ump ~ TOTAL - .~.: o ~i ~ N e CALIBRATION -~ .' ~'k~- . .... ~ ~" CHECK~ F~T I~ F~T l~Ow GALL~$ RETURNED TO ~-,,..~M~( *.~n uoo[~, g.,~ NUMSt. CALIBRATION : ' CHECKED ~ A~U~TED TO ~ J J .. ST~T ' OYES ~NO J ~VU ~ NO % .-~;. Pump ~ TOTAL ,os,~ Note: i. All meters must have calfbratlon checks a minimum of twice a yea~, which may · ,: include checks done by the Department of Weights and lqeasures.' jr : ~ ' Before starting ·calibration runs, wet the: calibration, can with product and return product to storage. ..3. Run. 5 gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gal'lens and cubic ~ lnqhes drawn, and return product to storage, · 4. Rt~_"" 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half op~n'=.~ into t~e can. Note gallons and cubic ld~hes drawn, and ~eturn Product to storage. ' Aft?~;al 1 p~oduct 5. .., for one calibration check is returned to storage, remember .: ' .~: t O r '' record the volume returned to storage in column 9 of the Inventory ' ReCording Sheet. ~;;~: - -~ ! 6. I~-.-the volume ~asured. in :a 5-gallon calibration Can is more than 6 cubic .:~,.~.~'. inches above O,~" 'below the'5-gallon:;'~ark, the meter requires calibration by a -',~:' registered deV"ce repairman.. ' " , ¢ Date/Time Hose ~Tank ,/ -"~,ast Flo. Slo~ ,1o. Vo~me Returned Calibration Device Repairman Date , "...'~ Pump ~~~uct 5"~Dllon Draft 5-Oallon Draft to Storale Required*. Used for Callbra' ~-~.,, 3a19 Cu, Inches Cu. Inches Gallons Yes No. Calibration Owner or Operator Slgna. C(~MP~JTER'CHANGE O CALIBRATION' R~-,ord of Computer Chan3e, Meter Chsn(le; or ..I zl ' ,/ '-- ' I 'u'~ " I .-- ~~~~" ..~..,r, - ~ ~O~,,UO~L "I CALI~RATION I CHECKED ~JM~TE~ TO TOTALIZ[~ ! ~ J CHECKED ADJU=i rED TO 1 / CHECKED ADJU~I t.O TtJ -I ] U I ALIZER FINISH ~"':'":' Pump ~- TOTAL ~'"~"~ "~ '"""''" '° ] a~m~L NUUUEn CALIBRATION CHECKED · ADJUSTED TO TOTALIZER FINISH READINGS ~v ~LLONS tO~,ZEA S~UEU .. { ~ECKEO ADJUSTED TOTALIZER FINISH J :' - I ' --'~' ---~ " ' m ' ......... " '-" ic Geotechnical Associates, Inc. f 4200 Easton Drive, Ste. 2 · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (805) 324-7768 Ol ~D MAINTENANCE YARD SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORKPLAN AMMENDMENT ic Geotechnicol Associates, Inc. [ 4200 Easton Drive, Ste. 2 · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 °. (80,5) 324-7768 Ms. Delores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Environmental Health Services Dept. County of Kern 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 January 14, 1991 Re: Old Maintenance Yard Site Characterization Permit #: 060007 Dear Ms. Gough: On October 25, 1990, a site characterization workplan for the above referenced site was submitted to the Environmental Health Services Department for your approval. Your response, dated November 7, 1990, was a series of comments to be addressed before approval (copy attached). This letter contains responses to each comment and serves as an amendment to the original proposed work plan. Comment 1. Soil boring #1 will be drilled first until two consectutive soil samples show zero OVM reading (above background). The depth of the other borings will be determined in the field by the project geologist/ engineer with the concurrence of a representative from this Department. Response 1. Exploration will consists of drilling at least three vertical borings to a sufficient depth to achieve two consecutive five-foot samples showing zero PID reading (above background). The depth of each boring will be determined in the field by the project geologist with the concurrence of a representative from the Environmental Health Services Department (see paragraph 2.0 of the attached Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures). Comment 2. The number and location of the outer borings can be modified on site depending on field conditions/findings. Response 2. N/A Comment 3. A complete health and safety plan. Response 3. See attached Health and Safety Plan. If you feel it is necessary, we will be happy to meet with you in person to discuss the procedures outlined in our workplan and in the attached amendments to the work plan. Respectfully submitted, Rod Williams attachments: EHSD Ltr dtd 11/7/90 Health & Safety Plan PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.  Environmental Health Se~ice~ Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT s~:v~ McCALU~¥, Rr~S, Dm~CTOR DIRECTOR ~r Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE !II VaLUAM J. ROI)DY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Development Se~ices Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT November 7, 1990 Mr. Rodney Williams Kern County Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA Subject: Location: 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Known As: Kern High School District Permit #: 060007 Dear Mr. Williams: We have reviewed the October 25, 1990, "Site Characterization Workplan" submitted for the subject site. Approval of the workplan will be granted if the following will be incorporated into the scope of work: 1. Soil boring #1 will be drilled first until two consecutive soil samples show zero OVM reading (above background). The depth of the other borings will be determined in the field by the project geologist/engineer with the concurrence of a representative from this Department. 2. The number and location of the outer borings can be modified on site depending on field conditions/findings. 3. A complete health and safety plan. Please submit your response to the above items by November 21, 1990. If ygu have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough '.~ Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program ! DG:cas \060007.1tr "~'~' 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 oo HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN OLD MAINTENANCE YARD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to provide for worker and environmental Health and Safety during underground fuel tank site characterization at the Old Maintenance Yard, Bakersfield, Kern County (Figure 1). This project will be conducted by Self Insured Schools of Kern (SISK) and Pacific Ocotechnical Associates, Inc. (PGA). 2.0 SITE HISTORY In accordance to the Kern County Environmental Health Services, SISK is submitting this Health and Safety Plan to guard worker safety at the site. Soil contamination was documented ~ during removal of an underground fuel tank by McNabb Construction Company. Soil samples taken two feet and six feet below the tank recorded 470 and 3,300 parts per million Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons respectively. After the tank was removed the excavation was backfilled with spoils. The excavation was not lined prior to backfilling. The Site Characterization Work Plan to which this Health and Safety Plan applies calls for at least three boring for the purpose of obtaining undisturbed samples for laboratory analysis. The planned list of work is summarized in the following tasks: Task 1: Preparation of a Site Characterization Work Plan and this Health and Safety Plan. Task 2: Drill at least three soil borings to depths sufficient to characterize the contamination plume. Undisturbed soil samples will be collected at 5-foot intervals. Each boring will be geologically logged and monitored for hydrocarbon vapors with a portable photoionization detector (PID). Soil borings will be destroyed by filling with cement. All drilling spoils and rinsate will be sealed in 55-gallon drums and transported to a certified hazardous waste disposal facility. Task 3: The soil samples will be submitted to SMC Laboratories for chemical analysis for TPH and BTXE using EPA method 8020. 1 / 14/91 Maintenance Yard oo Task 4: Prepare and submit a technical report summarizing of the results of the site characterization including, but not limited to results and interpretations of data, discussion of methodologies, boring descriptions and remedial action options including a recommended option and risk appraisal. 3.0 EMERGENCY CONTACI~ In the event of an emergency occurring during the characterization program, the following emergency facilities are available: Police - Call 911 Fire 911 or 631- 8421 Fire Station No. 1 2101 H Street (south on Chester 3/4 mile and west on 21st Street 2 blocks) Ambulance 911 Hospital San $oaquin Community Hospital 2615 Eye Street 395-3000 (south on Chester 1/4 mile and west on 26th Street 1. block) A telephones is located inside the Tire Shop (Figure 2). In case an emergency occurs, the following procedures should be implemented: Mil~or C~lIs or Abrasions. Wash affected area with soap and water and bandage. A first aid kit with eye wash solution must be located on site. The site safety officer is basic first aid trained. Serious Physical In)ur)/. In the event of serious physical injury: a. Call immediately for ambulance or medical assistance. b. Follow protocols established in the Medical Emergency R~ferenc~ Manual #1 (Emergency Medical Planning, Inc.) until assistance arrives. The site safety officer is basic first aid trained. c. If an ambulance is not available, transport victim to nearest hospital (San Joaquin Community Hospital). H & S Page 2 4/91 Maintenance Yard The following information must be recorded by the project engineer or site safety officer for any emergency situation as soon as possible: a. Notifier's name. b. Date, time, and location of the incident. c. Nature of emergency (describe what happened). d. Type and amount of materials involved. e. Extent of injuries, if any. f. Agencies and/or organizations notified, names of people notified. g. Actions taken. 4.0 PERSONNEL The following personnel are expected to be at the site during the assessment project: SISK - Rod Williams PGA - Randall Metz and/or Brian Hirst Drilling Operator - (unknown at time of publication) Kern County (EHS) - Delores Gough Mr. Rod Williams is designated as site safety officer and will be responsible for ensuring compliance with this plan at all times. Mr. Williams has completed the 8-hour Health & Safety Supervisors Training course. Mssrs. Williams, Metz and Hirst have completed the necessary 40-hour Health & Safety Training requirements. Drilling personnel will also have the necessary Health & Safety training. Personnel access to the work zone will be limited if Level C personnel protective equipment are required. Only personnel properly equipped with Level C equipment (see Section 10.0 below) will be allowed to enter the contaminated zone. SISK will provide Level C equipment for only SISK, PGA and the drillers. 5.0 WASTES The contaminant to be encountered at the site is gasoline. The specific hazardous substances that are likely to be encountered are shown in Appendix A. Applicable exposure data for these substances are presented in Table 1 Hazardous Substances Data. Symptoms of exposure and first aid treatments for each chemical are presented in Table 2 Exposure Symptoms and First Aid Treatment. As listed in Table 1, the lowest permissible short-term exposure limit (STEL) concentration is 5 ppm (for benzene). This concentration will be used to establish the requirement to don Level C personnel protective equipment (see Section 9). Contaminated boring spoils and rinsate will be sealed in 55-gallon drums, labeled and stored on site pending sample analyses and acceptance by a licensed waste disposal facility. H & S Page 3 .. 1 / 14/91 Maintenance Yard 6.0 ~OB HAZARDS Chemical hazards could be encountered from direct skin contact with the contaminated soils or breathing volatilized chemicals in the air. Level D equipment includes standard work clothing and gloves which would reduce direct skin contact with chemical encountered (sec Section 5). A photoionization detector (PID) will be in continuous usc in the breathing zone and if organic vapor concentrations of 5 ppm above background are detected, Level C equipment will be donned by all personnel in the contaminated zone. The respirator should protect workers from inhaled contaminants. Weather conditions have thc potential to disrupt the project in that if it is raining, drilling and sampling should be postponed. It is unlikely that temperature conditions would preclude completion of the project. Temperature ranges expected to be encountered are 50°F to 70°F. 7.0 RISK ASSESSMENT The potential for adverse health or safety risks to the on-site workers or the immediate surrounding area is low. Concentrations of the hazardous substances encountered in the previous assessment at the site have been low, and it is unlikely that high concentrations will be encountered especially considering that the source of contamination, the underground fuel tank, has been removed. Since the site is located outdoors, the atmospheric dispersion of contaminants will be significant. Special arrangements for possible school evacuation .should not be required. No authorize_~i ,personnel may be permitted to stand near the boring location during site characterization. If students, school employees or any other non-essential personnel enter the work site, they will be informed that health and safety procedures have been established to protect both the workers and the public. If they refuse to leave, school administrators will be contacted. 8.0 EXPOSURE MONITORING A PID will be in continuous use during drilling operations. The ionization constants for all of the substances likely to be encountered (benzene 9.24eV, ethylbenzene-8.76eV, toluene-8.2eV and xylene-8.56eV) are all within the detection range of the PID (less than 10.2eV).' If the organic vapors in the breathing zone detected by the PID exceed 2 5 ppm above background levels (to be measured prior to excavation and up-wind of the site) for more than five minutes, the personnel in the contaminated zone will don Level C protective equipment, including respirators. Level C equipment will H & S Page 4 .. 1/14/91 Maintcnancc Yard TABLE 1 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DATA (all in ppm) ~ Benzene Ethylbenzene TOluene Total Xylene PELa 1 100 100 100 STELb 5 125 150 150 IDLHc Carcinogen 2,000 2,000 1,000 Odor Thresholdd 1.4 2.0 2.1 NEe LEL/UELf (in %) 1.3/7.1 1.0/6.7 1.2/7.0 1.1/7.0 Max. Levels at site 26 130 370 730 a - Permissible exposure limit in air for 8-hour day as established by ACGIH (1987 update) b - Short-term exposure limit in air for 15-minute period as established by ACGIH (1987 update) c - Immediately dangerous to life or health from NIOSH Pocket Guide to Hazardous Substances (1985) d - As adapted for AIHA Journal (1987) e Not Established f Lower Explosive Limit/Upper Explosive Limit from NIOSH Pocket Guide to Hazardous Substances (1985) H & S Page 5 4/91 Maintenance Yard TABLE 2 EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS AND ~,ST AID TREATMENT Chemical Route(s) of Entry General Symptoms First Aid Treatment Benzene Inhalation, Inges- Odor - Aromatic EYES - Irrigate im- tion, Contact Upper respiratory mediately for and GI tract 15 minutes irritation, SKIN - Water muscle spasms, flush immediately slow pulse, BREATHING - Art- extrasystoles, ificial respiration hypokalemia irri- and move to fresh air. tated eyes, skin burns INGESTION- Medical attention immediately Ethylbenzene Inhalation, Inges- Odor - Aromatic Same as benzene tion Irritated eyes and mucous membranes headaches, dermatitis narcosis, coma. Toluene Inhalation, Skin Odor - Aromatic Same as benzene Absorption, Inges- Fatigue, weakness, tion, Contact confusion, euphoria, dizziness, headache, dilated pupils, lacrima- tion, nervousness, muscle fatigue, insomnia, paresthesia dermatitis, photopia Xylenes Inhalation, Skin Odor - Aromatic Same as benzene Absorption, Inges- Dizziness, excitement tion, Contact drowsiness, incoordina- tion, staggering gait, irritated eyes nose or throat, corneal vacuolization, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain,' dermatitis be worn continuously in the contaminated zone until such time as the PID concentrations are below 5 ppm above background. If PID concentrations H & S Page 6 1/14/91 Maintcnancc Yard measured in thc breathing zonc cxcccd 1,000 ppm above background, thc site area will be evacuated immediately. Reentry will not be allowed until concentrations arc below 1,000 ppm or Level B equipment is provided. Care will be taken in operating thc PID to avoid monitoring vehicle exhaust. 9.0 PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT Level D equipment will be required at all times that thc PID measured concentrations arc below 5 ppm above background. Level D equipment includes: · hard hats · safety boots · eye protection (safety glasses or goggles) · neoprene gloves (while handling samples) If organic vapor concentrations equal or cxcccd five ppm above background, all personnel in the contamination zone (see Section 10) will don Level C equipment and remain in Level C equipment until organic vapor concentrations arc reduced to below five pp. above background. Level C equipment includes Level D equipment plus: · half-face respirator equipped with combination organic vapor/dust cartridges · tyvek suits SISK will provide Lcvcl C personnel protective equipment for its own representatives. If Level C equipment is required, only personnel equipped with Level C equipment will be allowed to enter the contaminated zone, which includes thc immediate working area. Anyone other than thc SISK representatives and thc drillers who desires entry into thc exclusion zone under Level C conditions will be required to provide his/her own Level C personnel protective equipment and demonstrate applicable qualifications. Thc site safety officer or thc designated assistant will ensure that no one without proper personnel protective equipment enters the exclusion zone under Level C conditions. Level C equipment provided by SISK will be stored in the SISK vehicle when not in use. 10. WORK ZONES Two basic work zones will be established for this project: a restricted zone (exclusion zone) encompassing the drilling area and a clean zone. Only the exclusion zone may be formally delineated by a tape barrier. The decontamination zone and clean zone will be separated by function only. Final zone boundaries will not be delineated. 1 1. DECONTAMINATION H & S Page 7 1/14/91 Maintcnaace Yard All personnel who have been working in the contamination zone as defined in Section 10 above shall undergo personal decontamination: · when leaving the exclusion zone for coffee or lunch breaks; · at the end of 'the work day. The decontamination station shall include the steps listed in Table 3 Personnel Decontamination. Steps pertaining to equipment that is not in use (e.g., respirators) may be eliminated. TABLE 3 PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION Decontamination Equipment 1. Outer glove' and 1 - plastic drop cloth. boot removal Set equipment on plastic, wash in soap solution, rinse and dry. 2. Air purifying respirator 1 - plastic drop cloth. Lay equip- ment down, wash in soap solution, rinse and dry. 3. Hand wash 1 - 3- to 5-gallon bucket. Liquid hand soap. 4. Hand rinse and dry 1 - 3- to 5-gallon bucket. Paper towels. TABLE 4 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION Decontamination Steps Equipment 1. High pressure steam rinse Steam generator 2. Inspect visually n / a 3. High pressure steam rinse as necessary Steam generator 12.. GENERAL SAFETY MEASURES H & S Page 8 4/91 Maintenance Yard The following general safety procedures shall be followed by all persons entering and/or working in the designated work zones: · No employee or subcontractor may be allowed on-site without the prior knowledge and consent of the site safety officer. All personnel at thc site shall be advised of the site safety requirements as discussed in this plan. · All contractOr or subcontractor personnel shall bring to thc attention of thc site safety officer or resident project representative any unsafe condition or practice associated with thc work activities that they are unable to correct themselves. · There will bc no smoking, caring, chewing gum, or drinking thc contamination zone. · Hands shall be thoroughly cleaned prior to smoking, eating, or other 'activities outside the contamination zone. · Team members must avoid unnecessary contamination (i.e., walking through known or suspected "hot" zones or contaminated puddles, kneeling or sitting on the ground, leaning against potentially contaminated barrels or equipment, etc. · Respiratory devices may not be worn with beards, long sideburns, or under other condition that prevent a proper seal. 13. PLAN ACCEPTANCE All personnel involved with this project are required to read this Health and Safety Plan and sign in the space below that they have read this plan and understand its requirements. Prior to beginning work on the first day of the project, the site safety officer shall conduct a site safety meeting to explain the requirements o this plan and unsure that all personnel are familiar with it. Site safety meetings shall be held at the beginning of each work day of the project. Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date H & S Page 9 1/14/91 Maintenance Yard Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation Date Name Affiliation H & S Page 10 OLD MAINTENANCE YARD Figure 1 LOCATION MAP '. · 1/2 mile Date: ~ 11, 1~0 J. Minoe ~ OVERHEAD POWER LINE ~,#4 ~ ~ / EXCAVATION - N- SB #3 '~ (backfilled) ; SB #1 i ; i ~ STORM 2'-470 ppm ' ! ~ DRAIN 6' - 3,300 ppm ~ :i ..~, S B #2 ~: ~ PARKING (asphalt covered) PARKING (asphalt covered) 2'- ND - fX -- PIPING 2'- ND 6' - ND "~~ i.~.~ -DISPENSER WALK- IN I~ sa #1 Soil Boring BOX OLD IMM~ENANCE SHOP X Sample Location '~ Figure 2 i,, } Tank Location laL l' PLAN 2' - 1,700 ppm Depth below tank - 10 FEET 6'- ND · ppm TPH I.--, I ND = Not Detected SiSal R~.~: 1 ~2~9e PGA OLD MAINTENANCE YARD SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT Submitted on behalf of KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT by Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. September 9, 1991 ~-~g~ ~0~['~)/~1 ?& Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 TABLF~ OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Site History ...................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Purpose and Scope ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 2 3.2 Soil Sampling Procedures .............................................................. 2 4.0 Findings ...................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Soil Profile ........................................................................................... 4 5.0 Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 5.2 Tank Site .............................................................................................. 5 5.3 Groundwater ....................................................................................... 5 6.0 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 6 6.2 Findings ................................................................................................ 6 6.3 Risks ....................................................................................................... 6 7.0 Remedial Action Options ........................................................................... 7 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 7 7.2 Option 1/ No Action (Natural Biodegradation) .................... 7 7.3 Option 2/ Excavation, Aeration, and Natural Biodegradafion ....................................................................... 8 7.4 Option 3/ Excavation and Removal to a Disposal Site .............................................................................................. 9 7.5 Recommendation .............................................................................. 9 8.0 Statement of Qualifications ...................................................................... 9 9.0 Closing ...................................................................................................... 10 Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Old Maintenance 9/9/91 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd~ LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Number 1 Old Maintenance Yard Site Location MaP Figure Number 2 Plot Plan Showing Soil Boring Locations, Cross Section and Contamination Plume Figure Number 3 Cross section A - A' APPENDICES Appendix A Logs of Soil Borings Appendix B Laboratory Results Appendix C Chain of Custody Documents Pacific Geotechnical Associates, inc. iii Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 1.0 Introduction This report details site characterization studies conducted at the Old Maintenance Yard, 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California (Figure 1) on · July 24th, 1991 by Pacific Geotcchnical Associates, Inc. (PGA). The work was contracted by Kern High School District. The purpose of this work was to determine the vertical and lateral extent of product plume(s) resulting from a leaking gasoline tank (which, along with a fuel dispenser, had been removed), assess the potential environmental impact of the contamination and propose three remediation options which are compatible with the nature of the contamination plume and the surrounding cultural conditions at the site. This report contains background information regarding the site, a description of the study methodology, and subsequent findings. An evaluation with conclusions and recommendations for site remediation alternatives are also discussed. The appendices to this report contain the log of the exploratory soil borings, laboratory results and chain of custody records. 2.0 Site History Soil contamination was documented during removal of an underground fuel tank and nearby dispenser by McNabb Construction Company. Soil samples taken two feet and six feet below center of the tank recorded 470 and 3,300 parts per million (ppm) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) respectively. Soil samples taken at two feet and six feet below the dispenser indicated no detectable concentrations of contaminants. The cause and quantity of release of product was unknown. The Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) requested that a site characterization be conducted to further study the unauthorized release of product at this site. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 1 Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 3.0 Purpose and Scope 3.1 Introduction The purpose and scope of this study was to define the vertical and lateral extent of the product plume associated with the leaking tank located at the site and to ascertain if any product had reached the water table. The sampling program described below was followed to achieve this end. 3.2 Soil Sampling Procedures On January, 6th, 1991, three exploratory soil borings, soil borings #1, #2 and #3, were advanced at the locations shown in Figure 2. Personnel of PGA performed the soil boring operations using a hand auger capable of retrieving undisturbed soil samples in two-inch diameter by six-inch brass sample sleeves. Six samples were collected and described for laboratory analysis. On July 24th, 1991, three exploratory soil borings were advanced at the locations shown in Figure 2. Soil boring #1 was twinned with a deeper boring, #lB, approximately three feet west-southwest of the original boring, and #2 was reentered and deepened. Soil boring #4 was advanced five feet northeast of the edge of the backfill. Personnel of PGA supervised soil boring operations and collected and described samples for laboratory analysis. Drilling services were provided by Melton Drilling Company of Bakersfield, California. Soil boring locations were selected by PGA personnel based on previous findings, field findings and recommendations made by Delores Gough of the KCEHSD. The positions of the borings were later determined for mapping purposes using a measuring tape. The soil borings were advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 drill rig equipped with an 8-inch diameter, continuous flight, hollow stem auger. Samples were collected using a hammer driven, split spoon sampler lined with 2.5-inch by six-inch brass rings. Soil borings #1, #2 and #3 were continuously cored to 13.5, 13.5, and 14 feet respectively. Subsequently, soil boring #lB, was continuously cored for stratigraphic control using the Mobile Drill starting at 10 feet to a total depth of 24 feet. Soil boring #2 was alternately augered and cored for sampling at Pacific Geotechnlcal Associates, Inc. 2 Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 five foot intervals with the first sample taken at ten feet to a total depth of 21 feet. Soil descriptions were made by a geologist under the supervision of a registered geologist,?d/and consisted of soil type, grain size, color, texture, sorting, inclusions, odor, and other distinguishing features. A Foxborro Model 128/FID Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) detector was used to field screen samples for volatile organic compounds (VOC's). This measurement was recorded in parts per million (ppm) as methane, and was taken from a capped brass ring core sample which had been agitated and set in the sun to warm for several minutes. Samples selected for laboratory analysis had both ends inspected for lithology and were then immediately sealed with laboratory tape, plastic covers and secured with duct tape. Each sample was labeled, placed in an ice chest and maintained at 4 degrees Celsius until delivered to BC Laboratories in Bakersfield. Chain of Custody procedures were followed (see Appendix C). All samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene (BTXE), and total hydrocarbon (TPH) as gasoline using EPA methods 8020 and 5030 with a flame ionization detector (FID). The results of the analysis are presented in Appendix B and are summarized in Figure 3. The split spoon sampler and the brass tubes were washed with a non- phosphate detergent and rinsed with water between samples to insure quality control. Boring ceased when successive field screening measurements fell below five ppm using the OVA. After the samples were obtained and the operations complete, the bore holes were filled with concrete. Spoils from the augered soil borings were placed in 55-gallon drums, sealed, labeled and stored on site. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 3 Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 4.0 Findings 4.1 Soil Profile As seen in Figure 3 and Appendix B, the soil profile generally consists of a sequence of conglomerate, conglomeratic sand and poorly sorted sands, silts and clays. A layer of clay is present in boring #2 from 1.5 feet to approximately 4.5 feet, with an overlying sandy silt layer to the surface and interbedded sand and clay to a depth of six feet. Soil borings #lB, #2, and #4 encountered conglomeratic sand below 12 feet, while soil borings #lB and #4 appear to have bottomed in conglomerate. The highest OVA field screening values were recorded within the baekfilled excavation rather than in native soil. The highest TPH values were recorded in backfill as well. Refusal of the sampler was encountered in soil boring #4 at the total depth of 25.5 feet due to large diameter cobble. Visual observations indicated soil moisture levels were typical of the vadose zone, ranging from the low to the high end of the normal range of vadose saturation. There was no indication that the water table was penetrated. A detailed description of the soils encountered in the borings is pre§ented in Appendix A of this report. The OVA field screening and laboratory analysis of soil samples are presented in Appendix A and B and summarized in Figure 3. An evaluation of the significance of these findings is presented in Section 5.0. 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Introduction This section evaluates the findings of the investigation to better develop conclusions and recommendations regarding this site. The evaluation is based on the results of observations and laboratory data. The purpose and scope of the investigation is to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of gasoline contamination, to ascertain if any product reached the groundwater, and to present options for appropriate remedial action. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 4 Old Maintenance 9/9/91 5.2 Tank Site The maximum level of TPH as gasoline observed in soil borings #Il#lB is 1400 ugm/gm at ten feet. Levels of TPH as gasoline decrease below this depth dramatically to ND with a slight increase at 21 feet to 1.3 ugm/gm in sand. BTXE values at this location mirror the TPH values, with benzene having a maximum value of 8.5 ugm,/gm at 10 feet in soil boring #1 and ND at 21 feet in soil boring #lB. Soil borings #2, #3, and #4 characterize the lateral extent of contamination associated with the tank. Soil boring #2 recorded no detectable levels of TPH as gasoline, benzene, xylene, and ethylbenzene. The maximum level of toluene recorded is 0.079 ugm/gm at a depth of 6.5 feet. Soil boring #3, advanced at the edge of the backfill, recorded a maximum of 53 ugm/gm TPH and BTXE appreciably below action levels as calculated using the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field Manual (LUFT, 1989, produced by the State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Task Force.) Based on the results of soil borings #1, #lB, #2, #3 and #4 the contamination plume associated with the tank site appears to have levels of TPH as gasoline above 1,000 ugm/gm and benzene levels above 1 ugm/grn restricted to depths predominantly within the fill. The overall radius of the plume is eight feet and is centered in the northeast quarter of .the tank location. Contamination with greater than 500 ppm TPH has a 5.5 foot radius, and TPH greater than 1000 ppm has a 3.5 foot average radius. Levels of TPH as gasoline greater than 500 ugm/gm extend vertically from four feet to 16 feet. The approximate volume of soil with TPH as gasoline greater than 1000 ugm/gm is estimated at seven cubic yards. 5.3 Groundwater The 1989 Water Supply Report published by the Kern County Water Agency indicates that the depth to groundwater in the Summer of 1989 was between 100 and 150 feet. The base of the plume is at least 80 feet above the water table, assuming an minimum depth to groundwater of 100 feet as of April, 1990 (from the Kern County Water Agency Water Supply R~port 1989. May, 1990). Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 5 Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 6.0 Conclusions 6.1 Introduction The tank location at the Old Maintenance Yard has been characterized for the vertical and horizontal extent of product plumes associated with leakage. Five soil borings ranging in depth from 13.5 to 24.5 feet were advanced with all soil samples being analyzed for TPH as gasoline and BTXE. A plan view (Figure 2) and a cross sectional views (Figure 3) of the contamination plume are included in this report. 6.2 Findings The maximum vertical extent of contamination where TPH exceeds 500 ugm/gm is approximately 16 feet at the tank site. All measured levels of contaminants were at their maxima (1400 ugm/gm for TPH as gasoline and 8.5 ugm/gm benzene) within the backfill. The maximum volume of soil with contamination levels greater than 1000 ugm/gm TPH as gasoline at the tank site is estimated at seven cubic yards. The volume of soil with contamination levels greater than 500 ugrn/gm TPH as gasoline at the tank site is estimated at 18 cubic yards. 6.3 Risks This site does not pose a threat to groundwater due to the contamination source having been removed. Significant expansion of the plume is not expected providing that no driving mechanism is introduced (such as excessive surface water percolation). Groundwater is not considered to be threatened by the contamination plume because it is-at least 80 feet below the deepest detectable levels of contamination, and further migration of the plumes is not expected due to removal of the sources of contamination. The site is in the middle of a large parking area of a warehouse which is intermittently used by the Kern High School District. The asphalt is currently in poor repair and is cracked in several places. Human exposure to the site is limited to truckers driving their rigs to the loading docks, the nearest of which is approximately 40 feet from the center of the site. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 6 Old Maintenance 9/9/91 7.0 Remedial Action Options 7.1 Introduction Three remedial options are presented for the tank sites. These options take into consideration the following: 1. The site does not pose an immediate threat to groundwater. 2. Potential migration routes of the contaminants include downward migration due to excessive percolation of surface waters and upward migration of volatile vapors. 3. Vapors from the site could pose' potential concerns. Supervision, testing and quality control for any of the mitigation alternatives have not been included in these cost analyses. These estimates have been developed only for providing a general comparison between the three alternatives and should not be used for preliminary budgeting purposes. 7.2 Option 1/ No Action (Natural Biodegradation) No remedial action will be taken. The tank site will be resurfaced to meet the needs of the maintenance yard and the soil boring spoils will be removed to a proper disposal facility. Concentrations of contaminants will decrease with time due to; 1) the removal of the sources of product and 2) natural biodegradation processes which are already active. The time required for TPH gasoline and BTXE concentrations to be reduced significantly or to non-detectable levels in the soil cannot be known. Containment by surficial concrete and asphalt may isolate contaminant vapors from human activity. A notice will be posted near the old dispenser location and on the outside of the loading dock informing the public that gasoline contaminated soil is present beneath the driveway and where information concerning the contamination can be found. This option is feasible and will cost $1,000 or less to implement. Pacific Geatechnical Associates, Inc. 7 Old Maintenance .9/9/91 7.3 Option 2/ Excavation, Aeration, and Natural Biodegradation The soil with the highest levels of contamination (greater than 500 ugm/gm but less than 2000 ugm/gm TPH), amounts to a total of approximately 25 cubic yards. This soil will be excavated and placed on plastic sheeting in a remote corner of the warehouse yard and covered with plastic sheeting so as to eliminate headspace. The tank site will then be backfilled with certifiably clean soil. Each day the allowable volume of contaminated soil will be removed from the covered pile and will be spread to a thickness of approximately six inches to one foot and allowed to aerate. The daily volume will not exceed the allowable as determined by the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District Rule 8- A sample of the excaVated soil will be obtained from the covered pile and analyzed for BTXE and TPH as gasoline prior to aeration. Samples of the aerated soil will be obtained and analyzed regularly with an OVA to determine when product concentrations have fallen below action levels. When the contamination level in the soil is certifiably below action levels, it will be removed to an approved disposal site. The excavation will be backfilled with soil free of contamination, organics and debris, and recompacted to standards set by existing building codes. The import material should be non-expansive, granular in nature, and certified as clean prior to use. The surface will be graded and resurfaced to meet the needs of the Maintenance Yard facility. The concentrations of contaminants remaining in the ground will decrease with time due to: 1) the removal of the sources of product and 2) natural biodegradation processes which are already active. The time required for the remaining TPH gasoline and BTXE concentrations to be reduced to non- detectable levels in the soil cannot be known. A notice will be posted near the old dispenser location and on the outside of the loading dock informing the public that gasoline contaminated soil is present in the yard area and where information concerning the contamination can be found. Pacific Geotechnlcal Associates, Inc. 8 Old Maintenance 9/9/91 This option is feasible and will cost approximately $6,000 to implement. 7.4 Option 3/ Excavation and Removal to a Disposal Site Approximately 25 cubic yards of the backfilled soil in the tank area will be removed and transported to an approved disposal site. The excavations will be sampled at total depth and analyzed for TPH and BTXE. When samples are recovered which test contamination below action levels recommended by Kern County Environmental Health Services, the excavation will be filled with clean soil and compacted to meet City building codes. The excavation will be backfilled with soil free of contamination, organics and debris, and recompacted to standards set by existing building codes. The import material should be non-expansive, granular in nature,and certified as clean prior to use. The surface will be graded and resurfaced to meet the needs of the Maintenance Yard facility. This option is feasible and may cost as much as $9,000 to implement. 7.5 Recommendation Option 1 is recommended as the most cost effective remedial action alternative. Biodegradation is a natural process which is presently active at the site. The volume of contamination is sufficiently small, that ongoing dispersion and biodegradation will continue to reduce the concentrations of contaminants to acceptable levels. The 80 foot minimum distance to the water table is sufficient to make the threat to groundwater remote. Sealing of the lot with asphalt will isolate the plume from human activity and retard water percolation and flushing of the plume. 8.0 Statement of Qualifications This document has been prepared by Steven H. Lewis, Project Geologist. Mr. Lewis earned his B.A. in Geology and Business Administration from the Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 9 Old Maintenance 9/9/9 1 University of the Pacific. He has broad experience in petroleum and environmental geology in California, Alaska, and Montana. The preparation of this document has been supervised by Randall T. Metz, a Registered Geologist of the State of California (#3995). Mr. Metz has participated in a number of site assessments including assessments of properties involving oil field activities. He has been practicing geology in California since 1976 and has published several articles on San Joaquin Valley geology. 9.0 Closing This report is intended for the exclusive use of the Kern School District. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. assumes no responsibility nor liability for the reliance herein or use hereof by anyone other than the above named client. In addition, all of the laboratory work cited in this report was prepared by BC Laboratories, Inc., or SMC Laboratory, Bakersfield, which are solely responsible for the contents and conclusions of their respective reports. Respectfully submitted, Steven H. Lewis Project Geologist Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 10 OVERHEAD POWER LINagE ' ~ EXCAVATION ~iii~i!~i:~: SBIC2 ~fllled) (bac.illed) ~ (asph~, revered) ~ DISPENSER I ! TIRE SHOP ~lc~ A~i~es, Inc. ~ Soil ~ring Kern High School District .. Old Maintonanco Yard ~ Tank location [OG TIO 1" = 20' ~u~.,,, i~ ~...~EW,~ Figure 1 SISO~ Al SB#3 SB#1 SB#1B Excavation (Backfilled) LEGEND Contamination Plume (TPH Gasoline) '-- ~ ~ND 500 ~_.1000 ~ ~echnicol Associotes, Inc. ugm/gm ugm/gm Kern High School District Old Maintenance Yard X Sample Location ~ Soil Boring ,'-~""'"~;, iaLOT PLAN O La~oratory ,: ,_. Results in ppm Tank Location '~, .; SI~IOJNING CROSS-SECTION AND 1" = 5' CONTAMINATION PLUME ~" I s.,o,,, SCALE I FIGURE 2 ~ Bend In ~ectlon '~' . 2 lB I 3 4 i ..... ~. .. .. .. .. .. ~.~ _~°~,, ~ _ _ t .....................~,'~:.. · ' ~"~"~ .~".~".~".~".~"~".~".~"-~"-~".~".~".~".~".~".~".~" ".~":'~'~ ~'.~" '.~".~".~'~.~".~"~.~".~".~".~".~".~".~"~".~".~"~"~"~ ~"~";'"*"~" .; ~.~ .~ ~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~.~ .~ ...... .~ ~.~...? .~..~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~.~.~ .~ .~. ., ~::~ ..~...~...~...~...~...~...~..~...~...~...~...~.. ~Conglomerate ~ Conglomeratic Legend contamination Plume Sand (TPH Gasoline) ['~ Sand ~ Silt ~ Silt, Clay ~ Clay ~ Fill .......... ~-i~' ...... $00 >1000 ugm/gm ugm/gm kal}oratory analyses 8oal~ {F~,t)~~""~-'"--- o ~'~ G~ot~hnicel B/T/X/E TPH-G,...Total Petroleum Field analyses Hydrocarbon as~a,o,in~in~ ~ CROSS SECTION A- A' 8 ............ Benzene in ug/g T ............ Toluene in ug/g OVA field screening of headspace gases X ............ Xylene in ug/g recorded in parts per million as methane. Author; SIll I Proi~.' Sm00~ I Figure 3 OLD MAI~ANCE ~ Logs of Soil Borings Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Prope~/Oamer: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Boring # SB~I Localion: CENTER OF TANK Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO PGA Personnel: R. METZ~ M. MCGRATH~ S. LEWlS~ TEN Drilling Coelrater: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Ddller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Date: 1/5~ 7/24/91 Drilling Method: HAND AUGER I HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth: ~ 13.5/24 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPLIT SPOON 12' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 2' / 8' Time - Start: 12:45 End: 14:30 CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP EOT CNT PPM 0.0 0.5 ~ SW SAND TAN MD/CRS POOR NONE NONE FILL ......_ 0.5 1.0 ~ SW SAND TAN MD/CPS POOR NONE NONE 1.0 1.5 W SW SAND TAN MD/CPS POOR NONE NONE 1.5 2.0~ SW SAND TAN MD/CBS POOR NONE NONE 2.0 2.5 ~ SW SAND TAN MD/CRS POOR NONE NONE 2.5 3.0 ML SILT SANDY DRK BRI~ MSV POOR NONE NONE 3.0 3.5 ML SILT SANDY DRK BRI~ MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 3.5 4.0 ML SILT MICA GRY/BRh MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 4.0 4.5 ML SILT MICA DRY/BBb MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 4.5 5.0 ML SILT MICA GRY/BRI~ MSV PBBLY NONE NONE S.0 S.S EL SILT MICA GRY/BRh MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 0 1 5.5 6.0 ML SILT SANDY DRK BRI~ MSV PBBLY SL SL 1.5 5.0 6.5 ML SILT SANDY DRK BRI~ MSV PBBLY SL SL 6.5 7.0 ML SILT SANDY DRK BRI~ MSV PBBLY MOD MOD ~~ 7.0 7.5 ML SILT SANDY DRKBRI~ MSV PBBLY MOD MOD ~ ~ 7.5 8.0 ~-~ SAHD ~ DIRK GFI~ MD/CE MOD MOD MOD ~~ 8.0 8.5 SW SAND DRKGR¥ MDICR MOD MOD MOD 8.5 9.0 SAND DRK DRY MDICR MOD MOD MOD 9.0 9.5 ~ SW SAND DRKGR¥ MD/CE MOD MOD STRONG 9.5 10.0I SW SAND DRKGR¥ MD/CE MOD MOD STRONG 10.0 10.5 SW SAND GREY MD/CE SLPBLY SEGHT SUGHT 100 2 10.5 11.0 ~._ SAND ~- GREY MD/~CR__ SLPBLY SUGHT SUGHT ~~ 11.0 11.5~SW SAND GREY MD/CE SLPBLY SUGHT SUGHT '~1.5 12.0 SW SAND ~_ GREY MDI~CFI SLP.....__~BL._~Y SUMO__D SUGHT 12.0 12.5 SAND GREY MD/CE SE PREY SUMOD SLIGHT THIN 2" CLAY LAYER 12.5 13.0 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CE SLPBLY SUMOD SEGHT 13.0 13.5 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CB MOD LIGHT MOD HITSOLID STRATA AT 135' PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 o! 2 Property Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Bodng # SB~IB Location: CENTER OF TANK Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO PGA Personnel: R. METZ~ M. MCGRATH~ S. LEWlS~ TRN Drilling ContTator:. MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Driller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Date: 1/5~ 7/24/91 Drilling Method: HAND AUGER I HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth:. 13.5124 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL ..Sample Equip: 18' SPLIT SPOON / 2' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 2' / 8' Time - Start: 12:45 End: 14:30 CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 ] 1.5 2.0 ] I 2.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 I 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.5 10.0 ...... 1 70% 10.0 10.5 7 ~ SW SAND GRY/TAN CONG MD/PR NONE NONE MEDIUM SAND~ OCCASIONAL FNE/CRS ~ 70% _10.5 11.0 7 ~ SW SAND~ GRY/TAI~ CONG MD/PR NONE NONE 13:11 A 1 70% 11.0 11.5 7~ SWSAND GRY/TAN CONG MD/PR NONE NONE ND 2 70% 12.0 12.5 15J[[[[[~ ML SILT SAND DRK GRY CONG POOR NONE NONE 13:17 B 4-5' LAYER OF MUDDYSlLT, BLACK 2 70% 12.5 13.0 15 I~ SW SAND DRK GRY CONG MD/PR NONE NONE HIGH POT. MICA 3 60% 13.0 13.5 10 ~ SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE ~ 60% 13.5 14.0 12t SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE 13:25 C SLIGHTLY SILTY, FNE/MED GRVL. 3 60% 14.0 14.5 9 SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE ND SMALL PEBBLES 1' IN DIA. 4 6(~/o 14.5 15.0 5 SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 of 2 Pml=erty Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Bodng # SB~IB Location: CENTER OF TANK Site Ad.ess: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO PGA Personnel: R. METZ, M. MCGRATHr S. LEWISr TRN Drilling Conlrator: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Driller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Date: 1/5, 7/24/91 Drilling Method: HAND AUGER I HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth:. 13.5/24 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPLIT SPOON / 2' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 2' 1 8' Time - Start: 12:45 End: 14:30 CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 4 60% 15.0 15.5 6 / SW SAND LTBRN CONG POOR NONE NONE 4 60% 15.5 16.0 12'~ SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE ND 5 9(P/o 16.0 16.5 5 SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE 5 90% 16.5 17.0 6 ~ SW SAND LTBRN CONG POOR NONE NONE ND 5 90% 17.0 17.5 7 ~ SW SAND LT BRN CONG POOR NONE NONE DECREASING CONGLOMERATE 6 90% 17.5 18.0 ? ~ SW SAND MED BRN MD/CS VPOOR NONE NONE 6 90% 18.0 18.5 ? ~ SW SAND MED BRN MD/CS VPOOR NONE NONE 13:42 D 6 90% 18.5 19.0 ? ~ SW SAND MED BRN MD/CS VPOOR NONE NONE ND 7 90% 19.0 19.5 25 ~ SW SAND MEDBRN MD/CS VPOOR NONE NONE 7 900/° 19.5 20.0 26 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/VC V POOR NONE NONE 0.2 INCREASING ANG- SUB ROUNDED DARK 7 90% 20.0 20.5 30 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/VC V POOR NONE NONE CLASTS IN V. CRSE SIZE RANGE 8 90% 20.5 21.0 23 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/VC V POOR NONE PUNGEN'I' 8 90% 21.0 21.5 25 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/VC VPOOR NONE PUNGENT 0.2 13:54 E 8 90% 21.5 22.0 30 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/VC V POOR NONE PUNGEN'r ND ~9 80% 22...._.~0 22.5 10 SW SAN.__..~D ~ GRY/BRN MD/CS V POOR NONE NONE ND 9 80% 22.5 23.0 18~~' SAND GRY/BRN MD/CS V POOR NONE NONE 9 80% 23.0 23.5 28 ~' SAND ~ GRY/BRN MD/CS V POOR NONE SL PNGT ND SL PNGNT. ODOR, NO OVA RESPONSE 10 70% ~ 24.0 38 SAND GRY/BRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE ND TD IN CONG. 3' DIA. COBBLE STRUCK 10 700/° 24.0 24.5 91 ~ SW SAND GRY/BRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE 14:20 F IN SAND CATCHER PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 2 o! 2 Property Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Boring # SB~2 Location: 9.5' 225° FR. SB~I Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO 128 FID PGA Personnel: M MCGRATH~ R. METZ~ S. LEWISt TRN Drilling Contrator: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Driller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Date: 2/6t7/24/91 Drilling Method: HOLLOWSTEM AUGER / HAND AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth: . 21.5 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPLIT SPOON/2' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 2'/8' 'rime - Start: 14:50 End: 15:25 ............. · -~..:..:.:.:.:......,:.:,::. ..... : ::: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................,.,:...:................... CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 0.0 0.5 SW SAND TAN MD/CR$ NONE NONE FILL 0.5 1.0 ML SILT iSAND~ BROWN MSV NONE NONE FIRST 9.5' OF RESULTS GATHERED FROM 1.0 1.5 ML SILT SANDY BROWN PBBLY NONE NONE HAND AUGER. ..... 1.5 2.0 CL CLAY GREY MSV NONE NONE 2.0 2.5 CL CLAY GREY MSV NONE NONE 2.5 3.0 CL CLAY GREY MSV NONE NONE 3.0 3.5 CL CLAY GREY MSV NONE NONE 3.5 4.0 CL CLAY GREY MSV NONE NONE 4.0 4.5 CL CLAY TAN MSV NONE NONE 4.5 5.0 SP SAND BROWN V FNE NONE NONE 5.0 5.5 ML SAND BROWN V FNE NONE NONE 5.5 6.0 CL CLAY BROWN MSV NONE NONE MICACEOUS 6.0 6.5 SM SAND BROWN FINE NONE NONE 6.5 7.0 ~1111~ ML SAND BROWN SILTY NONE NONE 11:50 1 7.0 7.5 ii!ii!iiiiiiiii s. SAND TA. MED CR .ONE NONE 7.5 8.0 SM SAND TAN MEDICR NONE NONE 8.0 8.5 ~ S----.~--P SAND ~ TA~N MED/CFI ~ NONE N.~_~E 8.5 9.0~ SC SAND BROWN MED NONE NONE 9.0 9.5 SM 'SAND BROWN MED/CR NONE NONE 9.5 10.0 SP SAND BROWN MED/CR NONE NONE ~1 90% 10.0 10.5 10 SW SAND BRN/GRY FN/CR MD/PR NONE NONE 1 90% 10.5 11.0 9 SW SAND ~ BRN/GRY FN/CR MD/PR NONE NONE 15:07 ~ SAND, MED. RANGE FN/CR, OCC. SM. GVL. 1 90% 11.0 11.5 11 SW SAND BRN/GRY FN/CR MD/PR NONE NONE ND .... 12.0 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.5 14.0 14.0 14.5 14.5 15.0 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 of 2 Pmpert~ Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Bodng # SB#2 Location: 9.5' 225° FR. SB#1 Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO 128 FID PGA Personnel: M. MCGRATHr R. ME'I-Z~ S. LEWlS~ TRN Ddlling Conffator: MELTON DRILUNG COMPANY Drille~: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SlS002 Date: 2/6~7124/91 Drilling Method: HOLLOWSTEM AUGER I HAND AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth: 21.5 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample ECluip: 18' SPLIT SPOON/2' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 2'/8' Time - Start: 14:50 End: 15:25 CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 2 90% 15.0 15.5 13 ~ SW SAND LTBRN F/VCR VPOOR NONE NONE 2 90% 15.5 16.0 15~ SW SAND LT BRN F/VCR V POOR NONE NONE 15:16 B CONGLOMERATIC 2 90% 16.0 16.5 16 ~ SW SAND! LT BRN F/VCR V POOR NONE NONE ND INCREASING CONGL WITH DEPTH 19.5 20.0 3 80% 20.0 20.5 18 ~ SW SAND LTBRN FN/CR POOR NONE NONE 3 80% 20.5 21.0 23 ~ SW SAND LT BRN FN/CR POOR NONE NONE 15:22 C OCC. SMALL GRAVEL 3 80% 21.0 21.5 34 ~ SW SAND LT BRN FN/CR POOR NONE NONE ND CMPLT. HOLE ND ON OVA CLEAR SD. 21.5 22.0 22.0 22.5 22.5 23.0 23.0 23.5 23.5 24.0 24.0 24.5 24.5 25.0 25.0 25.5 25.5 26.0 26.0 26.5 26.5 27.0 27.0 27.5 27.5 28.0 28.0 28.5 28.5 29.0 29.0 29.5 29.5 30.0 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES. INC. PAGE 2 of 2 * Property Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Boring # SE43 Location: 7' 55° FR. SB~I · . Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO 128 FID PGA Personnel: M. MCGRATHr R. METZr S. LEWIS~ TRN Drilling Conlrator: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Ddller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Dale: 2/6/91 . Drilling Melhod: HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Ri~ Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth:. 13.5 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPLIT SPOON/2' BRASS SLEVES Hole Diameter: 8"/2' '13me - Start: 12:30 End: CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT· SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 0.0 0.5 ~ SW SAND TAN FN/MD SL SlLT~ NONE NONE 12:30 FILL 0.5 1.0 ~ SW SAND TAN FN/MD SLSlL'I'~ NONE NONE 1.0 1.5 ML SILT SANDY DK BRN MSV PBBLY NONE NONE ASPHALT CHUNKS ..... 1.5 2.0 ML SILT SANDY DKBRN MSV PBBLY NONE NONE .. 2.0 2.5 ML SILT SANDY DKBRN MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 2.5 3.0 ML SILT SANDY DKBRN MSV PBBLY NONE NONE 3.0 3.5 CL CLAY SANDY BRN MSV SL PBLY NONE NONE 3.5 4.0 CL CLAY SANDY BRN MSV SL PBLY NONE NONE 4.0 4.5 CL CLAY SANDY BRN MSV SL PBLY NONE NONE 4.5 5.0 CL CLAY SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY SLIGHT SMGHT 5.0 5.5 CL CLAY SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY SLIGHT SUGHT 15 1 5.5 6.0 CL CLAY SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY SLIGHT SLIGHT 6.0 6.5 .. CL CLAY SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY SLIGHT SMGHT 6.5 7.0 ~ SW SAND GREY FN/MD SL PBLY SLIGHT SMGHT 7.0 7.5 ~ SW SAND GREY FN/MD SL PBLY SLIGHT SEGHT 7.5 8.0/ SW SAND . TAN FN/MD SL PBLY NONE NONE 8.0 8.5 SW SAND TAN FN/MD SL PBLY NONE NONE 8.5 9.0,,-,~-,,~,~ SW SAND TAN FN/MD SL PBLY NON. E NONE 9.0 9.5 ~-/ffj~.,. ML SILT SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY MOD MOD 9.5 10.0~ ML SILT SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY MOD MOD 50 13:40 2 10.0 10.5 ,, ML SILT SANDY DK GRY MSV SL PBLY MOD MOD 10.5 11.0 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CS SLPBLY SEGHT SUGHT 11.0 11.5 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CS SLPBLY SLIGHT SEGHT 11.5 12.0 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CS SLPBLY SLIGHT SLIGHT 12.0 12.5 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CS SLPBLY SLIGHT SLIGHT 12.5, 13.0 ~ SW SAND GREY MD/CS SLPBLY SLIGHT SLIGHT 13.0 13.5~-//',/',//~ ML CLAY DK BRN MSV SL PBLY NONE NONE CLAYEY WET PLASTIC 13.5 14.0 ~ SW SAND TAN CRS SL PBLY NONE NONE >1 HARD LAYERAT 13.5' PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 of 1 Pmperbj Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Boring # SB~4 Location: 20.8' NE OF SB~2 Site Address: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO 128 FID PGA Personnel: STEVE LEWIS~ TILEY NUNNINK Drilling Conlrator: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Driller.' MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SIS002 Data: 7/24/9! Ddlling Melhod: HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Depth: . 25.3 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPET SPOON Hole Diameter: 8' ~me - Start: 15:45 End: 16:40 CORE 'REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 I 70% 5.0 5.5 3 ~1 SC SAND GREY VFN/MD POOR DARK MOD ~ 70% 5.5 6.0 5 SC SAN.___~D DK GRY V FN/MD POOR DARK MOD 15:52 A OCCASIONAL COARSE GRAVEL SAND ~1 70% 6.0 6.5 6 SCSAND DK GRY V FN/MD POOR DARK MOD 98 VERY CLAYEY SILTY 6.5 7.0 AUGERED AHEAD 7.0 7.5 ..... 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.5 10.0 2 80% 10.0 10.5 8 SM SAND BROWN FN/CRS POOR NONE NONE 2 80% 10.5 11.0 11 ~ SM SAND BROWN FN/CRS POOR NONE NONE 16:00 B 2 80% 11.0 11.5 9~ SM SAND BROWN FN/CRS POOR NONE NONE 2 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 of 2 Prof)ert~ Owner: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Boring # SB#4 Location: 20.8' NE OF SB~2 Site Addre~,,s: OLD MAINTENANCE YARD OVA: FOXBORO 128 FID PGA Personnel: STEVE LEWlS~ TILEY NUNNINK Ddlling Co~lrator: MELTON DRILLING COMPANY Driller: MICHEAL BRAYSON PGA Job #: SISO02 Date: 7/24/91 Drilling Melhod: HOLLOWSTEM AUGER Rig Type: MOBIL B-53 Total Del)Ih: . 25.3 Elev.: GROUND LEVEL Sample Equip: 18' SPMT SPOON Hole Diameter: 8' 'l~me- Start: 15:45 End: 16:40 CORE REC. DEPTH BLOW LOG USCS TYPE MOD. COLOR TEXT. SORT. STAIN ODOR OVA TIME # # % TOP BOT CNT PPM 3 90% 15.0 15.5 13 ~ SW SAND LTBRN FN/CRS VPOOR NONE NONE 3 90% 15.5 16.0 19 ~ SW SAND LT BRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE 16:03 C OCCASIONAL GRAVEL- PEBBLES TO 2-3' 16.5 20 ~ SW SAND LT BRN FN/CRS V P(:X:)R NONE NONE 1.1 3 9O% 16.0 16.5 17.0 ~,UGERED AHEAD 17.5 18.0 18.0 18.5 18.5 19.0 19.0 19.5 4 90% 20.0 20.5 18 SW SAND LT BRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE 4 100% 20.5 21.0 28 ~ SW SAND LT BRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE 16:18 D OCCASIONAL FINE GRAVEL 4 100% 21.0 21.5 32 ~ SW SAND LTBRN FN/CRS V POOR NONE NONE 0.5 21.5 22.0 AUGERED AHEAD 22.0 22.5 22.5 23.0 ..... 23.0 23.5 23.5 24.0 24.0 24.5 24.5 25.0 ..... 5 70% 25.0 25.5 65 ~ GM SD/CG LTGRY FN/CRS VPOOR NONE NONE 0.1 INSF. RECOVERY FOR ANALYSIS. LG. DIA. 25.5 26.0 I I .C. OBBLE PREVENTING PENETRATION. 26.0 26.5 .R..EC'D VERY LITTLE SAND~ 65 BLOWS TO 26.5.. 27.0 GO 4', REC'D 3' SAND. COMPLETED 27.0 27.5 I HOLE WITH LOW OVA READING PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 2 of 2 Laboratory Results Pacific Geotechnlcal Associates, Inc. SMC Analytical Chemistry Client Name: Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Address : 4200 Easton Dr. Ste.2 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Attention : Mr. Rod Williams Date samples received : 02-06-91 Date analysis completed: 02-08-91 Date of report : 02-11-91 Project Name: Old Maintainance Yard Job Number : 515003 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: 610 ID: SB ~1-1 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene 0.016 0.0050 Toluene 0.17 0.0050 Ethylbenzene 0.017 0.0050 p-Xylene 0.027 0.0050 m-Xylene 0.031 0.0050 o-Xylene 0.0094 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene 0.0051 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline) : 3810/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection.Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ugm/gm = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected Ma un~-~M~. Th~ i n -- Analytical Chemist 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: 611 ID: SB ~1-2 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene 8.5 0.0050 Toluene 56. 0.0050 Ethylbenzene 40. 0.0050 p-Xylene 57. 0.0050 m-Xylene 120. 0.0050 o-Xylene 80. 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene 11. 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) 1400. 1.0 612 ID: SB %2-1 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene ND 0.0050 Toluene 0.079 0.0050 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ~ ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 613 ID: SB ~2-2 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene 0.0064 0.0050 Toluene 0.013 0.0050 Ethylbenzene. ND 0.0050 p-Xylene ND 0.0050 m-Xylene ND 0.0050 o-Xylene ND 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene ND 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0 Ma ~n~The i n Analytical Chemist RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: 614 ID: SB ~3-1 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene 0.019 0.0050 Toluene 0.083 0.0050 Ethylbenzene 0.64 0.0050 p-Xylene 1.1 0.0050 m-Xylene 1.4 0.0050 o-Xylene 0.083 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene 0.12 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) 24. 1.0 615 ID: SB ~3-2 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm Benzene 0.32 0.0050 Toluene 0.57 0.0050 Ethylbenzene 1.0 0.0050 p-Xylene 0.89 0.0050 m-Xylene 0.42 0.0050 o-Xylene 0.66 0.0050 Isopropylbenzene 0.65 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) 53. 1.0 Analytical Chemist ~ ~NVIRO'N¥£NTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUI# J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-1 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB1B-A @ 10.5 - 11.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1311 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327"1911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-2 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SBiB-C @ 13.5 - 14.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1325 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.$. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ; ENVIRONYENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. f~ETROLEUAI J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR: 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/06/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-3 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB1B-E @ 21.0 - 21.5' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1354 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 8-5-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene 0.06 mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene 0.006 mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene 0.006 mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 1.3 mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor EN¥1RONI, IENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327.4911 FAX (805) 327.1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-4 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB1B-F @ 24.0 - 24.5' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1420 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab $: 8449-5 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB2-A @ 10.5 - 11.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1501 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM, ENGR, 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327~911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum ~ydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-6 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB2-B @ 15.5 - 16.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1516 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRO'NMENTAL lABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-7 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-O02 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB2-C @ 20.5 - 21.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1522 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INO. PETROL~F¥ J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/06/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-8 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768' Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB4-A @ 5.5 - 6.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1552 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 8-5-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene 0.009 mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene 0.007 mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg. 0.005 Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONYENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327~,911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #: 8449-9 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB4-B @ 10.5 - 11.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1600 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INO. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE $2 Report= 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab #= 8449-10 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description= SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB4-C @ 15.5 - 16.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1603 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186 Department Supervisor ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 3~.7-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Date of 4200 EASTON DRIVE SUITE #2 Report: 08/05/91 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Lab $: 8449-11 Attn.: STEVE L. 324-7768 Sample Description: SIS-002 - KHSD OLD MAINTENANCE YARD: SB4-D @ 20.5 - 21.0' (SOIL) 7/24/91 @ 1618 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHL/TRN TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 07/24/91 07/25/91 08-02-91 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Constituents Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene 0.007 mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0..005 m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1. Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor Chain of Custody Documents Pacific Geotechnlcal Associates, Inc.  Ge~- CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD : otechnical ~oci~es, Inc. >, ~~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RI:CORD Pacific Geotechnical Associole$, Inc. 4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield. Calif..93309 · (805) 832-7490 ~ c~ ~ ~ --~-'--'--- ~ 'CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pacific Geotechnical .~soci~fles, Inc. ! 4664 American Avenuo * Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (805) 832-7490 ~A~ ~:-'~B CONSTRUCTION G &PANY INVOICE . .* 7808 OLCOTT AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 .~ NO 9169 r soLD T6': ] r SHIP TO ] PAGE 1 K H S D Maintenance & Operations Facility 3701 E Belle Terrace APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Bakersfield, Ca. 93307 --~--J~--~ ¥~.o., '~- ATTN: Mr. Ben Seykora ITEM QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION S UNIT PRICE AMOUNT McNabb Construction furnished tools, labolr, and material to remove the existing taaks at the Maintenance & Operations Facility. Job Complete COMMENTS. Net due 10 days from date of Invoice TOTAL~ $3,900.00 COUNTY OF KERN ENVli 'AENTAL HEALTH SERVICES I BILLING DATE I 2.''' '':w '.,, STREET, SUITE 300 04 / 04 / gO BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 ~J~J~ 5 ~J~gJ] (805) 861-3636 I AMOUNT DUE 100.00 PERMIT/INVOICE #060007C-90 J AMOUNT ENCLOSED' K E RN H I G H S C HOOL D I S TR I C T CHARGES PAST DUE ARE SUBJECT TO PENALTY DISTRICT M & 0 ~/AREHOUSE 2000 24TH STREET J DUEDATE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 J 05/04/90 DETACH HERE PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION TO INSURE CORRECT PAYMENT IDENTIFICATION DETACH H~ ~ PLEASE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF KERN ~ SEND PAYMENT ;~ITHIN 30 DAYS TO AVOID 50~ PENALTY 04/04/91 PERMIT/INVOICE # 060007C-90 ANNUAL FEE FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY ~ITH ! TANK(S) LOCATED AT: 3100 CHESTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA NVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES KERN COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE &04.190 PENALTIES. ff any fee rec~red by this d~slon .700 'M" STREET, SUITE 300 ~,~'~~.. ~~~'~ X TOTAL AMOUNT DUE l 0 0.0 c AKERSFIELD. CA 93301 o ~ JUy ~ ~. ,~ i,, ,~, ~o~ o~ o ,,,,v,y .,~,~ ~. ~, ~,~ ',y~ (3 ~l 6/29/90 FY 90 KERN HIGH SCHOOL 10:31:27 WTR02S1 i'~;~ Posted Invoice Look-Up Ref: ACP.460 .11 Vendor: 50045 Invoice: 9169 Purchase Order: 102558 RPO MCNABB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Entered by: BAUMAN Batch ID: 5B1 7808 OLCOTT AVE. Posted: 5/01/90 1099 Inv: Y BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Invoice Date: 4/18/90 Invoice Due Date: Voucher Number: 812 Other Reference: Invoice Description: MCNABB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Account Number: 12.04.5629.67.0000.03 Invoice Total: 3,900.00 Paid Invoice Information: Check Number: APC~K 938316 Bank: FIB 112898210 Check Date: 5/01/90 Amount Paid: 3,900.00 Paid To: MCNABB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 01-01 SA MW KS IM II S1 S1018292 KB 6/29/90 FY 90 KERN HIGH SCHOOL 10:31:49 WTR02S1 T."...~. Invoice Lines Ref: ACP.460L.01 Vendor: 50045 MCHABB CONSTRUCTION cOMPANY Invoice: 9169 P/O #: 102558 CMD Quantity U/M Description Amount BEGIN 002.0 1.0000 EA M & O - FUEL TANK REMOVAL 3900.00 COMMANDS: L F T E POSITION: +n,n.n,-n,Roll-up,Roll-down 06-02 SA MW K~ IM II Sl S1018292 KB hnlcal Associates, Inc. ' '4200 Eadon Dr., Sutfe ~2 · ~M, Calif. 93309 · (80~ 3g~-7768 February 7, 1991 Ms. Delores Clough Environmental Health Serv. Dept. 2?00 'M" Street Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Delores: This is just a note to let you know where we ended up yesterday at the Kern School District Old Maintenance Yard site characterization. We augcr©d and sample~ three holes. Sample from 5B#1 had s~'ong hydrocarbon odors, SB#2 had no odor, and SB#3 had slight odor throughout. W© took samples every five feet starting at five feet ©xc©pt in SB#2 whore the samples were from 6.5 and ten feet. The samples were taken to SMC where they will be analyzed for BXTE and TPH (gasoline). Each hole stopped at 13.5 feet where we encountered a hard, impenetrable stratum. It may be a liner they put in the excavation when the tank was first installed. Rod Williams is checking with the School District. Wc will contact you 24 to 48 hours in advance before we get the truck-mounted auger out to finish the sampling. Thank you again for your assistance with the PID.. Sincerely, Randall T. Metz, R.G, FROM : PHONE NO. : 805 32 7 ? P01 ~"'"'~ifi¢ Ge~techmcal Associates, Inc. /~' ~ 42130 F. ozton Dr.,,~ulto ,~ * Bakersfield, Ca#f, 93309 * (80b') 324-77~ FAX TRANSMISSION COVERSHEET COMPANY: KEHSD Ma. Delores Oougll · ~.',;; ~: , ~ 61 - 3 4 2.9_ CONF. #: ,, , FROM: Randy Metz PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 4200 EASTON Suite 2, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 (805) 324-7768 FAX: (805) 327-1707 Page 1 of ....... _._'~ ....(incl. coversheet) Kern School District - Old Maintenance Yard SB~I Site Characterization SB#3 Fill ~'--~ Clay r~ 1.5 ~ S1~1-1 " SB~3-1 <1 100 50 ~ SBff2-2 Sand SB~-2 SamlMe # ' "9.4933 ft. 7.013:3 ft. WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY UST CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT CONTRACTOR NO: 15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: L SUBSTANCE: 8006619 SITE NO: 060007 FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y SITE NAME: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE REPORTED: 04/26/90 ADDRESS: 3100 CHESTER AVENUE DATE CONFIRMED: 04/26/90 CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 MULTIPLE R.P's: N SITE STATUS CASE TYPE: S CONTRACT STATUS: 9 EMERGENCY RESPONSE: RP SEARCH: S DATE UNDERWAY: 04/26/90 DATE COMPLETED: 04/26/90 PRELIMINARY DATE UNDERWAY: 04/12/90 DATE COMPLETED: 05/22/90 ASSESSMENT: C REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: 06/19/91 DATE COMPLETED: 10/08/91 INVESTIGATION: REMEDIAL ACTION: DATE UNDERWAY: / / DATE COMPLETED: / / POST REMEDIAL DATE UNDERWAY: / / DATE COMPLETED: ACTION MONITORING: ENFORCEMENT ACTION TYPE: DATE TAKEN: TAKEN: LUFT FIELD MANUAL CONSIDERATION 2, S, C, A. (CATEGORY 1, 2, 3, PLUS H, S, C, A, R, W, G, OR O AS APPLICABLE) CASE CLOSED: Y DATE CLOSED: 12/12/91 DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: / / REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: CD RESPONSIBLE PARTY CONTACT NAME: JENET FORD-SHELL SPECIALIST: 9 COMPANY NAME: KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT SENSITIVITY: NES ADDRESS: 2000 24th STREET ABANDONMENT #: Al183-06 CITY/ZIP: BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 DATE OF REPORT: 12/12/23 PHONE ;: ( ) - LEAK REPORT: Y CONTACT NAME: CONTACT NAME: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP: CITY/ZIP: PHONE =: PHONE #: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT NAME: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP: CITY/ZIP: PHONE..~' PHONE #: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT NAME: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP: CITY/ZIP: PHONE =: PHONE =: RES RCE MANAGEMENT A( ,qCY  Environmental Health Servic~ ~nt ~NDA~ L. ABBO~ s~ ~cC~ ~ ~v, ~s, m~o~ DIRECTOR Air Pollutm Co.~i D~ DAVID PRICE m ~ & RODDY, ~O ~T~ D~CTOR ~ & D~t ~ ~ent ~ g~, ~CP, DI~C~R VIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPAR ENT December 11, 1991. Janet Ford-Shell Kern High School District 2000 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 SUBJECT: Location : 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Known As : District Warehouse (Old Maintenance Yard) Permit # : 060007 Dear Ms. Ford-Shell: This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Further, it does not relieve you of the responsibility to clean up ex/sting, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Cough at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. cer, e~yr~--',, g-~ris Burger, R.F.H.S. Hazardous Materiais Specialist W Hazardous Materials Management Program CB:DG:cas \060007.b 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429  Enviror~memaJ Health Se~aces De~nt RANDAll_ L. ABBOTT STEVE McCALLEY, REH5, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DAVID PRICE I11 WrLUa~ ~. RODDY, a~CO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Develo~m~t ~ Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT October 21, 1991 Janet Ford - Shell Kern High School District 2000 - 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 SUBJECT: Location : 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Known As : District Warehouse (Old Maintenance Yard) Permit # : 060007 Dear Ms. Ford - Shell: The September 9, 1991, site characterization report prepared by Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc., has been reviewed. The report indicated the presence of gasoline contamination to a depth of 16 feet in the underground tank area. The volume of soil contaminated with levels over 500 ppm TPH (gasoline) was estimated to be 18 cubic yards. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc., discussed three remediation alternatives appropriate for the site. These alternatives are: 1. No Action (natural biodegradation and includes paving) 2. Excavation, aeration and natural biodegradation 3. Excavation and disposal Alternative 1 (No Action) was recommended. This Department approves of leaving the gasoline contamination in place provided the tank site will be capped to prevent or minimize the downward/upward migration of the contaminants. Please be aware that approval of this option is based on current regulatory requirements and may not exempt you from future liability. If you decide to pursue this alternative, the cap must be in place by November 18, 1991. Please notify this office after the capping is completed in order that we may conduct our final inspection. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Janet Ford - Shell October 21, 1991 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:ch cc: Randall Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. gough~fordshel.let  Environmental Health ~enace~ Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE M¢c.a-I I Fy, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ~r Pollution Control Di~ri~ DAVID PRICE III W~LUAM J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR P~anning & Development Setvice~ Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT June 19, 1991 Kern High School District Attn: Janet Ford-Shell 2000 - 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: Permits: 060007, District Warehouse 280007, West High School 310009, South High School 090009, Highland High School 110002, Foothill High School Dear Ms. Ford-Shell: Review of the above-referenced former underground tank facility files reveals that initial investigation for site characterization began in February, 1991. Our Office has been in communication with Mr. Andrew Marinello regarding the high school district's bid process and selection of an environmental contractor to complete the former UST site characterizations. It is our Department's understanding that Mr. Randall Metz of Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (PGA) has been selected to perform the required work. Since an inordinate amount of time has elapsed since the approval of the work plans submitted by PGA, our Department believes that site characterization work should begin immediately and move rapidly toward remediation efforts and subsequent closure. Permits: Ruggenberg Center, Injection Well 440009, Wasco Elementary School 440006, Wasco High School In addressing the status of Wasco Elementary School and Wasco Union High School, our Department desires clarification. Will these two former UST Facilities be incorporated into Kern High School District's bid process? If not, please advise. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Ms. Janet Ford-Shell, KHSD June 19, 1991 Page 2 Regarding the Ruggenberg Center's present injection well, a detailed explanation of required work has been forwarded to Mr. Marinello. A work plan will be required for approval before work begins. All high schools should be researched for presence of injection well disposal of hazardous materials. Formal notification of award of contracts should reach this Office within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Further delays should be avoided in completion of site characterization and remediation activities. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 549. Sincerely, Flora Darling, R.E.H.S. Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program FD:pss (dafling~fordshell.ltr) HIGH SCHOOL DISTiiilCT RTH STREET BOARD OF TRUSTEES / BAKERSFIELD, CAUF-ORNIA Brent R Casper, Prasident Dm~cl B. S~, Clerk ~fle J. ~OM~ N. JONES, Ed.,D., TELECOPY TRANSI [ITTAL SEND TO; ........ Fnvironmental Health Services,.._~..._...__DepartmJnt Chris Burger ATTENTION: .,. FAX MACHINE PHONE NUMBER: 861 - 3429 MESSAGE (if any): ' (see attachment.) NUMBER OF PAGES SENT (including cover sheet): 3 SENT BY: Neal Olsen -- Business Off~¢e (Name/Department) If you do noll receive all of the pages, please call back as soon lu possible: (80S) 631-3127 [~m High ,School District ] 2000 24th Street, Bakersfield, CA. 93301 FAX NUMBER: (805) 631-2133 MAR 08 '91 12:81 KERM H.S. DISTRICT 631-2133 P.873 .i March 8, 1991 In May and June of 1990, the KHSD embarked on a soils contamination tank removal pro4ect .at. five district schools. The Kern High SehoolDistriet wanted to move on this project fairly q:uickly because of the potential liability. We asked SISK to coordinate the project. Rod Williams called the Environmental Health ',erviees Department (EHSD) to see ff he could write the site characterization plan and s n off on it. They indicated to him that sign~Lg a plan required a registered geologist. Rod Williams wrote the plan and then had a registered ;eologist by the name of Randy Metz sign off on the plan. The plan was submitted to EHSD. The plans were rejected and returned lie Rod Williams because they were m~uate and addendums .w.ere required. The :~dendums were not retum~ to the EHSDlwxthin the specified time lmuts. EHSD made numerous attempts over a period of weeks[and months to get the required addendums returned - to no avail. As a result of these delays, Rod was cited on January 15, 1~;91 for being in violation of certain health and safety codes. Out of deference to the Kern High Schoo!. District, EHSD had ~een extremely accommodating by not citing tl~e district much earlier. Following the citing of Rod on January 15th and the set~g of a be.aring on January 1st, Rod submitted the required amended plans. The methodS, proposed m the amended plans were legal methods but they were ine.ffeetive methods ~ procure th.e necessary dam on four of the fiv~ sites. The delay continues even today· In the opimon of the EHSD, a geologist famili~ with tank work and the geology of the,.are, a, would not have proposed these methods. As of this date, the Kern High School Dismct does not know the extent of contamination or its potential liability because the~:s~ils samples still have not been taken. . In the opimon of the EHSD, had adequate plans and._' thetis been proposed for these projects in the f'~xst place, the work could have be~n completed within 90 days. Obviously, this is very distressing news to the Kern I~gh School District because the district will in,:ur additional, costs and .possible liability,i With respect to the soils testing, etc., an interesting fact emerges. The registered geologist who signed the site characterization .plans is also the lO.Whet of Pacific (3¢otcchnical Associates. PGA has extensive experience in dccp seismic interpretation work and has · · limited back/p'ound and experience in this type situation. Rod has handled this entire transaction, l~one of these projects went to competitive ~idding, even as a total package. As it turned out, the same man that signed off on the p!ans which Rod wrote ended up to be the contractor for all of the other soils work for the KHSD. None of these projects went tO competitive bidding. There are numerous excellcht companies in Bakcrsficid with substantial experience which perhaps did not get a chan~e at this work. MAR 88 '91 12:82 KERN q.~ DISTRICT 63i'-2133 P.3×3 I believe that Rod's delay in completing this work has st~bstantiaIly exposed the KHSD. I further believe he has engaged in highly unethical, ff not illegal conduct by these obvious conflicts of interest. I believe this specific lissue has significant negative implications for SISK, Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office and the Kern High School District. Geotechnical Associates, Inc. cific! 4200 Easton Drive, Ste. 2 * Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 * (805) 324-7768 March 11, 1991 Ms. Flora Darling ~,~ Environmental Health Serv. Dept. 2700 "M" Street B~ersfield, CA 93301 Re: Site Work Update West, South, Highland, Wasco H.S., Wasco Elem. and No. Coles Levee Dear F. lora: Attached is a copy of a letter describing the site characterization work performed at West, South and Highland High Schools. At the request of Kern Union School District, the truck-mounted drilling work will be bid out to qualified companies. I will be sending a bid letter out today with a bid deadline of March 19. The additional site characterization work will be performed as soon as possible after that date. Borings at the Wasco Union High School and Wasco Elementary sites will be advanced in conjunction with the work at the Bakersfield high schools. A copy of our application to the APCD to use the internal combustion engine at the North Coles Levee garage site has been forwarded to your office. We expect to get a response within two weeks. We hope to have the wells installed within that time frame. When the drilling contract is awarded I will contact you with the commencement date. As you know, the drilling companies are quite active at this time, and we will probably have to be put on a calendar. Thank you for your patients on these projects. Sincerely, Rand~a~ll~. Metz, R.G. RTM:pld encl ' Geotechmcal Associates, Inc. 4200 Easton Dr., Suite ~-2 · Bake~eld, Calif. 93309 · (805) 324-7768 February 27, 1991 Mr. Rodney N. Williams Director, Safety and Environmental Control Office of Kern County Superintendent of Schools P.O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA 93389 Re: Field Work Summary Site Characterizations Dear Mr. Williams: This correspondence contains brief abstracts of the current status of site characterizations for (1) Old Maintenance Yard, (2) Foothill High School, (3) Highland High School, (4) South High School, (5) West High School, (6) Wasco Union Elementary School, and (7) Wasco Union High School. The attachment (Status Chart) graphically shows the current status of each site characterization. To date, all soil borings were advanced using an AMS extendable soil recovery hand auger with a core sampling head. All soil samples taken for laboratory analysis were obtained at five (5) foot intervals, beginni'ng at five (5) feet below grade. The soil samples were analyzed for Benzene, Toulene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene (BTEX), and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Gasoline (TPH-G). (1) The Old Maintenance Yard site characterization commenced February 6, 1991. Soil Boring #1 is located at the center of the underground storage tank excavation site. This boring was advanced to a depth of 13-1/2 feet at which a hard strata of unknown texture was encountered, which halted further augering. Laboratory analyses at ten (10) feet give a TPH-G of 1,400 ppm. Soil Boring #2 is located 9-1/2 feet southwest of Soil Boring gl. This boring was also advanced to a depth of 13-1/2 feet until again Field Work Summa~! February 27, 1991 encountering a hard strata of unknown texture which refused further angering. Laboratory analyses give No Detection of TPH-G in this boring. Soil Boring g3 is located seven (7) feet northeast of Soil Boring gl. This boring was advanced to a depth of fourteen (14) until again encountering a hard strata of unknown texture, halting any further augering. Laboratory analyses at five (5) feet give a TPH-G of 24 ppm, and at ten (10~ feet a TPH-G of 53 ppm. As seen in the attachment (Status Chart), Phase II of the site characterization is the next step. This phase calls for a truck mounted hollow stem auger to advance the borings to a depth sufficient to achieve two consecutive five-foot soil samples showing zero PID reading (above background). (2) Foothill High School site characterization commenced February 12, 1991. Soil Boring gl is located in the center of the underground storage tank excavation, and was advanced to a depth of 21 feet. Laboratory analyses at five (5) feet give a TPH-G of 44 ppm, at ten (10) feet a TPH-G of 1,000 ppm, at 13 feet a TPH-G of 2 ppm, and TPH-G of None Detected at 18 and 21 feet. Soil Boring g2 is located 11 feet southeast of Soil Boring gl. This boring was advanced to a depth of five (5) feet at which solid concrete was encountered, refusing any further augering. No soil samples were obtained for laboratory analyses. Soil Boring g3 is located seven (7) feet southwest from Soil Boring #1. This boring was advanced to a depth of fourteen (14) feet at which a solid strata was encountered, halting further augering. Laboratory analyses at five (5) and ten (10) feet both give a TPH-G of None Detected. As seen in the attachment (Status Chart), Phase II of the site characterization is the next step. This phase calls for a truck mounted hollow stem auger to advance the borings to a depth sufficient to achieve two consecutive five-foot soil samples showing zero PID reading (above background). PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 2 Field Work Summary February 27, 1991 (3) Highland High School site characterization commenced on February 13, 1991. Soil Boring #1 which is located at thc center of thc '-- underground storage tank excavation, and advanced to a depth of only two (2) feet, at which a hard strata of pebbles and cobbles with diameters up to three (3) inches were encountered, which halted further augcring. This soil boring was repeatedly relocated to try to break through the hard strata, but were unsuccessful. Soil Boring #2 is located one (1) foot southeast of thc dispenser. This boring was augcrcd to a depth of 4-1/2 feet until a hard strata was again encountered which exhibited thc same characteristics as in soil boring #1. Soil Boring #3 is located approximately seven (7) feet southwest of the dispenser, and calls for a slant boring. This boring was not attempted with a hand auger as it requires a rather long slant boring to get under the sidewalk. As seen in thc attachment (Status Chart), Phase II of thc site characterization is thc next step. This phase calls for a truck mounted hollow stem auger to advance the borings to a depth sufficient to achieve two consecutive five-foot soil samples showing zero PID reading (above background). (4) South High School site characterization commenced February 13, 1991. Soil Boring #1 is located at the center of the dispenser excavation and was advanced to a depth of twenty (20) feet. Soil samples for laboratory analyses give a TPH-G of 11,000 parts per million (ppm) at five (5) feet below grade, and falls off dramatically at ten (10) feet with a TPH-G of 48 ppm. Soil Boring #2 is located approximately seven (7) feet northwest of Soil Boring #1. This boring was advanced to a depth of twenty (20). TPH-G at five (5) feet below grade is 7,200 ppm, and then decreases to 18 ppm at ten (10) feet, and None Detected at fifteen (15) feet. At twenty (20) feet TPH-G rises to 1100 ppm. Completion of this site characterization is needed to evaluate this anomaly at twenty (20). PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 3 Field Work Summ.,._ February 27, 1991 Soil Boring #3 is located approximately ten (10) feet northeast of Soil Boring #1. This boring was not attempted with a hand auger as it requires a concrete saw to penetrate thc sidewalk. As seen in the attachment (Status Chart), Phase II of the site characterization is the next step. This phase calls for a truck mounted hollow · stem auger to advance thc borings to a depth sufficient to achieve two consecutive five-foot soil samples showing zero PID reading (above background). (5) West High School site characterization commenced on February 14, 1991. Soil Boring #1 is located at thc center of the underground storage tank excavation. This boring was advanced to a depth of 20 feet. Laboratory analyses of TPH-O throughout the boring give None Detected. Soil Boring #2 is located two (2) feet south of thc dispenser site, and was advanced to a depth of 18 feet at a slight slant directed below the dispenser. Laboratory analyses of TPH-G throughout the boring give None Detected. Soil Boring #3 is located 13 feet northwest of Soil Boring #1, and was advanced to a depth of 20 feet. Laboratory analyses of TPH-G throughout the boring give None Detected. As seen in the attachment (Status Chart), the field investigation has been completed, and the next step is the drafting of the final report, recommending a clean closure of this site. (6) & (7) Wasco Union Elementary School and Wasco Union High School have both been tentatively approved pending comments on work plan amendments, from Flora Darling of the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department. Upon final approval of the work plans, these site characterizations will proceed directly to Phase II, which calls for a truck mounted hollow stem auger (Status Chart attachment). PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 4 Field Work Summary February 27, 1991 If you fcel it is neccssary, wc will bc happy to mect with you in person to discuss the work plans and site characterizations, or you can call me at (805) 324-7768. Sincerely, Randall T. Metz, R.G. PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 5 Site Characterization Drafting Final Report ......................................................................... Site Characterization Field Investigation .................................................................... Completed Site Characterization Phase II, Truck Mounted ............................................. Auger Needed Site Characterization Phase I, Hand Auger ............. Completed Site Characterization Workplan Approved Site Characterization Workplan Submitted ........................... Old Main Yd. Foothill H.S. Highland H.S. South H.S. West H.S. Wasco Elem.* Wasco H.S.* · !SELF INSURED SCHOOLS OF KERN STATUS CHAFrF ,=h~. ~ P~i~: SSK * Phase I of the Site Characterization is not applicable.- Dml~:l i~: PGA Da~: ~ - 13o/,~,~z~ --.O~$/q.f= - Nt,/NO _ =, ~/~ :z _ APPENDIX Laboratory Analyses RESOURCE MANAGEMENT A~NCY  Enviroranental Health ~ ~nt ~D~ L. ABBO~ ~ McC~ ~ ~, ~S, D~OR DIRECTOR ~ eo~ ~ D~ DASD P~ICE ill ~ & ~oD~Y, ~O ~T~ D~CTOR ~ ~ D~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~CP, Di~CTO~ ENVIRONMENTAL H~LTH SER~CES DEPONENT March 22, 1991 Janet Ford-Shell Kern High School District 2000 - 24th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 SUBJECT: Location: 3100 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Known As: Kern High School District PERMIT #: 060007 Dear Mrs. Ford-Shell: This letter is an official notice to inform you that, as the responsible party for the property described above, your agreement with the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department is about to expire, in accordance with Section d.2. of that agreement, which states: "Fourteen (14) hours of billable time has been reached. This will give notice that the available funds will be exhausted after six (6) additional hours of billable time at which time the agreement will expire. A statement estimating the amount time necessary to complete any remaining oversight work will be sent. The responsible party will then have another opportunity to renew their agreement with the County. "Failure to enter into another agreement shall require Kern County Environmental Health to utilize the State Water Resources Control Board Pilot Project for which the responsible party may be billed by the State directly for the cost of County services as well as State costs." You are hereby notified that the current balance in your trust account is $ 215.92. Remaining oversight will require an estimated 15 hours to complete. We are, therefore, extending this opportunity to renew your agreement with Kern County Environmental Health Services Department or to utilize the State Water Resources Control Board Pilot Project for completion of the required oversight actMties. 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 Janet Ford-Shell March 22, 1991 Page 2 As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating to the above- described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, and Kern County Ordinance Code, Chapter 8.48, require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result of this release. The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health Services Department for the oversight of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health Sen, ices Department in one of the two methods described below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under the terms of (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These options pertain only to costs associated with oversight. (A) STATE CONTRACT The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for the costs incurred by both the County and the State, pertaining to your site, under the State terms explained below: Whereas the federal Petroleum Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund provides funding to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the Legislature has authorized funds to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole or in part, from the federal Trust Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(ies) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Title 42 of the United States Code, Section 699Ih(h)(6) and Section 25360 of the Health and Safety Code, the above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Contwl Board not more than 150 percent of the total amount of site-specific oversight costs actually incurred while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. (B) COUNTY OF KERN LOCAL AGREEMENT OPTION Kern County Environmental Health Services Department is providing this option for those who prefer to pay the County directly and avoid the addition of State costs. Prior to the County's performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must enter into a County agreement, Attachment "B". Janet Ford-Shell March 22, 1991 Page 3 The environmental sensitivity (Attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by Environmental Health Services Department to determine the potential threat for groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Agreement Option; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Agreement Option, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition ex/sts. In such cases, Environmental Health Services Department will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It is necessary for you to respond, in writing, within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health Services Department of your choice: either the State contract or the County's Local Agreement Option. If you select the County's Local Agreement, please complete and sign the Local Agreement (Attachment B) and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health Services Departmem, 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Accounting - Local Agreement Option. If you select the State contract, please indicate, in writing, that you have made this selection and that you have read the above official notification. Failure to respond within ten (10) calendar days to this notice will automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under the terms of the State contract for Lealdng Underground Storage Tanks. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Susan Gonzales at (805) 861-3636, Extension 510. Sincerely, ~_.';-~ · Steve McCalley, Director b" Environmental Health Services Department LD:jrw Attachments (colt\06OO07.d) 3/5/91 Status Report Kern High School District. Environmental Contractor: Randall Metz. Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Foothill High School #110002 Hand au~ered on 2/12/91. Auger refusal on boring #2. Contractor will return later with a truck mounted drilling rig. Samples taken, no reports this date. Kern High School Distric Warehouse #06000? Hand augered three borings 2/6/91 to 13.5 feet. Auger refusal. Contractor plans to finish sampling with a truck mounted drilling rig. Highland High School. #090009 Hand Augered~ auger refusal at $ feet depth. Contractor plans to return to finish the characterization with a truck mounted drill rig. No samples taken. Wasco Elementary School #440009 2/26/91 acceptance of proposed site characterization work plan. Boring date not scheduled at this time. Wasco Union High School #440006 2/26/91 acceptance of workplan proposal to finish site characterization and move to mitigation procedures. Drilling date has not been set at this time. West High School #280007 Hand augered 2/14/91. Awaiting results of soil sampling and mitigation options. South High School: #310009 2/13/91 Slant drilling not completed. Hand augering too difficult. Contractor will return with a truck mounted drilling rig to complete site characterization. Samples taken. OFFICE MEMO H M M P - ENFORCEMENT TO: Chris Burger DATE: 3/6/91 FROM: Dolores SUBJECT: Chronology for Kern High School District C.O.L.T. Site (Permit #: 060007) DATE EVENT 05-24-90 C.O.L.T. notification and letter requesting site characterization mailed. Specified deadline is July 13, 1990 (for Permit # 060007). Deadline was extended to September, 1990 with Flora Darling's concurrence. 10-16-90 Letter reminding the deadline for the workplan mailed. 10-30-90 Received site characterization workplan. Need specific site health and safety plan; some items need clarification. 11-07-90 Sent letter listing additional requirements; deadline for responding specified is November 21, 1990. 12-11-90 Telephone call to Mr. Williams to inquire about the additional requirements for this site and the other Kern School sites. Not in, left message to call us. No response. 12-19-90 Telephone call to Mr. Williams. Not in, left message to call us. No response. 01-07-91 Prepare to bring Mr. Williams for an administrative hearing. RE~JRCE MANAGEMENT A~CY  Envirora~ental Health ~ Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McC~ ~ ~=¥, eEt~S, DmECTOe DIRECTOR ~, Pollution Control ~ DAVID PRICE I!I w~z.Lo~ J. RODDY, APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & De~k~m~mt ~ Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT January 22, 1991 Mr. Rodney Williams Kern County Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA 93385 SUBJECT: Location: 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Known As: District Warehouse Permit #: 060007 Dear Mr. Williams: We have completed our review of the site characterization workplan including the amendments submitted for the subject site. The work described in the proposal is acceptable and must be implemented by February 25, 1991. Please notify this office at least 48 hours prior to starting the field work. After all the samples have been retrieved and analyzed, a report prepared in accordance with Kern County Handbook UT-35 (rev. 7/90) must be submitted to this office within 60 days after completion of field work. A copy of this report must also be submitted to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, :Do Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Randall Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. \060007-2.1tr 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429  Environmental Health Sewices Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT ~ McCA! ! Fy, REHS, DiReCTOR DIRECTOR /uT Pollution Control District DAVID PRICE I11 W;U]~.M J. RODOY, /U'CO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Ptanning & Devek~ment Sewic~ Depatlment TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT Januar 15, 1991 Mr. Rodney N. Williams (SISK) Kern County Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA 93385 Re: West High School, Highland High School, South High School, and District Wa~'ehouse Dear Mr. Williams: On January 9, 1991, this Department reviewed Permits 280007, 090009, 310009, and 060007, located in Bakersfield, California, and found that you are in violation of the following laws: , Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7, Section 25298(C)(4), Chapter 6.75, Section 25299.37(C) It is necessary to request you to appear for a hearing to show cause why a complaint should not be filed against you. Please appear at Kern County Environmental Health Services Department, 2700 "M" Street, 3rd ;Floor, Bakersfield, California. Date: January 31, 1991 Time: 2:00 p.m. We encourage you to be present so this matter may be resolved without further legal action. Sincerely, Chris Burger, R.E..H.S. Hazardous Materials Specialist IV Hazardous Materials Management Program CB:jrw (hazmat\dar~schoois.hng) 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429  Environmental Health Service~ Department RANDALL L. ABBO'Fr STEVE McCA! ! ~'Y. REHS. DIRECTOR DIRECTOR Air Pollution Control Distr~ct DAVID PRICE !!1 W~LUAM ,J. RODDY0 APCO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Planning & Development Sendces Department TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT November 7, 1990 Mr. Rodney Williams Kern County Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA Subject: Location: 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfiqld, CA Known As: Kern High School District Permit #: 060007 Dear Mr. Williams: We have reviewed the October 25, 1990, "Site Characterization Workplan" submitted for the subject site. Approval of the workplan will be granted if the following will be incorporated into the scope of work: 1. Soil boring #1 will be drilled first until two consecutive soil samples show zero OVM reading (above background). The depth of the other borings will be determined in the field by the project geologist/engineer with the concurrence of a representative from this Department. 2. The number and location of the outer borings can be modified on site depending on field conditions/findings. 3. A complete health and safety plan. Please submit your response to the above items by November 21, 1990. .If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas \060007.1tr 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK' PLAN OLD MAINTENANCE YARD PROJECT DESIGN BY: Randall T. Metz Rodney N. Williams Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. SISK Ms. Darling -2- October 25, 1990 samples taken from beneath the tank indicate contamination levels above acceptable limits, a condition which has prompted this site characterization work. Depth to groundwater is greater than~150~ feet as indicated on the Kern County Water Agency map "Depth to Water in W~Ils, September 1989" (attached as. Plate II). The topography is flat, and the nearest active canal is approximately one- half mile east of the site. PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT RESULTS A total of six (6) soil samples were collected from beneath the tank by McNabb Construction Company and analyzed by BC Laboratories, Inc. (laboratory reports are attached). A summary of those analyses is as follows: SAMPLE LOCATION LABORATORY ANALYSIS (TPH) 2 feet under tank ........................ 470 ppm 6 feet under tank ........................ 3,300 ppm 2 feet under piping ...................... None Detected 6 feet under piping ...................... None Detected 2 feet under dispenser ................... None Detected 6 feet under dispenser ................... None Detected The samples retrieved from beneath the tank exhibited Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) values in excess of Department of Health Services (DOSH) recommended action levels for soil. ' ...................................................................... Following the removal of the tank, the excavation was backfilled and covered with clean soil (see figures 1, 2, 3, and 4). SOIL SAMPLING PLAN Introduction The following program is designed to assess the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination in the soil for the underground gasoline ~ank site. The program consists of a minimum of four (4) soil borings. Additional borings will be considered if contamination is laterally extensive. Locations and Depths Plate III shows the approximate location of the soil borings. These are numbered in the order in which they will be drilled. The following rationale was used for location selection: 1) Soil boring #1 will be made directly under the past location of the underground storage tank. Its purpose is to define the vertical extent of contamination. SISK SELF-INSURED SCHOOLS OF KERN Kern County Superintendent Mailing Address of Schools P.O. Box 9939 5801 Sundale Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93389 Bakersfield. CA 93309 (8O5) 39~3710 FAX (805) 398-3721 October 25, 1990 Flora Darling Hazardous Materials Specialist Environmental Health Services Department 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Ms. Darling: SUBJECT: Site Characterization Work Plan Kern Union High School District Location: 3100 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301 Known As: Kern Union High School - Maintenance & Operations Permit #: 060007 This correspondence is being submitted as the proposed Site Characterization Work Plan to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of soil contamination associated with the Kern Union High School - Maintenance & Operations underground storage tank. I hope this plan is satisfactory to you and meets the criteria as stated in the "UT-35 Handbook." Should you have any questions as you review this plan, please feel free to call my office at any time for clarification. CONSULTING FIRMS The Self-Insured Schools of Kern (SISK) Safety and Environmental Control Staff has been selected by the Kern Union High School District to act as their Environmental Consultant. SISK will coordinate and develop all plans stated above. SISK will utilize the services and expertise of Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (PGA}, a firm consisting of professional geologists registered by the State of California, to collect soil samples as described in this work plan and to review, approve, and sign all work plans submitted to the county for approval. SITE BACKGROUND The Kern Union. High School District has instituted a program to eliminate several underground fuel tanks at various locations within the City of Bakersfield. On April 12, 1990, one (1) 2,000 gallon unleaded gasoline storage tank and associated dispenser were removed from the back parking lot of the Kern Union High School - Maintenance and Operations Yard (Plate I). Inventory records indicate no loss from the tank prior to removal, but some staining and petroleum odor were observed when the tank was extracted. Soil "SERVING SCHOOL EMPLOYEES THROUGH BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT" Ms. Darling -4- October 25, 1990 beginning of work and between each soil boring. Soil samples will be retrieved using a split-spoon sampler and brase tubes using the same procedure as described above. Ail sampling equipment and brass tubes will be washed in a non-phosphate detergent and rinsed with distilled water between samples and between each boring. HEALTH AND SAFETY Personnel involved in the site characterization field work will comply with Level D personal protectiveequipment (boots, hard hats, eye protection). This will be augmented by wearing neoprene gloves when handling samples and sampling equipment. The Kern High School Maintenance building is located at the site and will be used for communication and first aid should an accident or emergency occur. The site will be flagged off to control public access, and all personnel and visitors to the site will sign the site log book each day. REPORT OF FINDINGS A summary report will be prepared by SISK and approved by PGA which will document field procedures, sampling procedures, analytical results, and data analysis. This information will then be used to develop the Site Characterization Report -- and the Remedial Action Options which will be submitted to the county for approval. The Site Characterization Report will conform to KCEHS requirements as outlined in "UT-35." Sincerely, Rodney N. Williams, Director Safety & Environmental Control Randall T. Metz-- Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. RNW/RTM:vrs ................... Enclosures cc: Janet Shell Ms. Darling -3- October 25, 1990 2) Soil boring #2 will be between the dispenser and the center of the tank, soil borings #3 and #4 will be approximately ten (10) feet and twenty (20) feet, respectively, from the center of the tank and at 120 degree angles from one another to cover the largest possible area. The purpose of the three latter borings is to define the lateral extent of contamination. Boring will cease after two (2) successive soil samples show measured Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) concentrations of zero (0) parts per million above background on an Organic Vapor Monitor (OVM). OVM readings will be. taken before soil boring begins to establish background values. All VOC concentrations will be documented on a field boring log which will be submitted to the KCEHS as part of the site characterization report. Destruction of Borings and Spoils Management Ail borings will be backfilled with bentonite clay and capped with concrete. Augered soil not preserved for laboratory analyses will be sealed and stored in 55-gallon drums. Laboratory Analysis, QA/QC Soil samples for laboratory analysis will be collected in brass tubes. /~ter the ~'~ of the sample tubes have been examined for lithology and any visible~-~ining, they will be covered with a Teflon seal and a plastic cap. The cap will be secured with duct tape, and the sample will then be labeled and placed in an ice chest which will maintain the temperature at, or below, 4 degrees centigrade. At the end of the day, all samples will be transported to SMC Laboratories, 3155 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, California 93308, a California State Certified Laboratory. Samples will be analyzed for TPH and BTXE using EPA methods 3810/8020. Chain-of-Custody forms will be completed when the sample is collected and maintained with each transfer of the sample. Sampling Equipment and Procedures The initial borings will be advanced using an AMS extendable soil recovery auger with a core sampling head capable of retaining a 2-inch by 6-inch brass sampling tube. Cutting samples will be described and recorded on a continuous log. The shoe of the auger head will be field screened with an OVA for VOC's with each sample retrieved. Soil samples will be taken at five (5) foot intervals commencing at fifteen (15) feet below grade in boring #1 and ten (10) feet below grade in borings #2, #3, and #4. In the event that contamination extends below the sampling capability of the extendable auger, the soil boring will be advanced with a truck- mounted, hallow-stem auger. The augers will be steam cleaned at the D POWER LINE / '~ EXCAVATION' -N- . SB #3 ~ .................... ~ (backfilled) 6'-3,300~m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ..... . PARKING ~ ~ (asphalt covered) (asphalt covered) ~ 2'-ND~~ / 6'- ND ~ 2'- ~D ~ SB ~ Soil Borin~ BOX Plate III /' ~ ~ Tank Location PLOT PLAN ~% 2'- 1,700 ppmDepth below tank- 10 FEET 6'- ND ppm TPH ! I ND = Not Dete~ I:'L~TE I MAP OF BAKERSFIELD  ~ LIMITS SCH~LS PARKS BUILDINGS r c~.~WIBLE RANDALL L. ABBOTT 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3502 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopier (805) 861-3429 STEVE Mc CALLEY Director RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES October 16, 1990 Mr. Rodney Williams Kern County Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 9939 Bakersfield, CA 93389 SUBJECT: Location : 3~00 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California Known As : Kern High School District Permit # : 060007 Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is to remind you of the necessary deadlines for work required at the subject site. A review of our records showed that the site characteriza- tion workplan was due in September, 1990. To date, this workplan has not been received by this Department. Please inform this office immediately of the status of this project. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636, Extension 545. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jrw (gouEh\khsd.ltr) ' 0 0007 LABORATORIES, INC. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAI(ERSFIEI.D, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 3274911 * Purgeable Aromatics , (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of '7808 iAlcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No..' 3350- 6 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Dispenser 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis 'Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xy~ene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum HydrOcarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O H.S Cert. ~102 ' ,~. ~'7 ~:~J. ~tJ~ifi' ~ ¥ Analyst · '"';' 0 000") LABORATORIES', INC. ~ . J, J, EGUN, REG. CHEIl, ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA 93308 PHONE 3274911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOZL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-5 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Dispenser 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date AnalYsis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum' Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results ~evel Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene, ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.$. Cert. #102 ~J~. ~,' E~in- - q ¥ Analyst LABORATORIES, INC. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA .3308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-4 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and 0 Piping 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum. Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method.§020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 LABORATORIES, INC. ~ . ~ ~ ~u~, ~ c~. ~. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (sg L) McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-3 Sample Desc: Kern High School District M and O Piping 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02 Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02 p-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 0.8 '(Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis .Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 LABORATORIES, INC. · . 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSRELD, CAUFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics McNabb Construction Date of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: 26-Apr-90 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Attention: Bryan McNabb Lab No.: 3350-2 Sample Des¢: Kern High School District M and O Under Tank 6' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received @ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum' Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ug/g 0.70 0.4 Toluene ug/g 20 0.4 Ethyl Benzene .ug/g 43 0.4 p-Xylene ug/g 73 0.4 m-Xylene ug/g 180 0.4 o-Xylene ug/g 87 '~'~' 0.4 Total Petroleum HYdrocarbons ug/g 3,300 10 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L..U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102 LABORATORIES, INC. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 933~ ',~.~ONE 327~911 Purgeable Aromatics ~X~~ .~-, '~'~'~' ~,~,~.~ McNabb Construction Date.of 7808 Alcott Ave. Report: · 26-Apr-gO ~. Bakersfield, CA 93308 ..~..~.~_; Attention: Bryan. McNabb Lab No.: 3350-1 Sample Desc: Kern High SChool District M and 0 Under Tank 2' Date Sample Date Sample Date Analysis Collected: Received ~ Lab: Completed: 12-Apr-90 12-Apr-90 24-Apr-90 Minimum RepoSing Analysis RepoSing Constituent Units Results ~vel Benzene ug/g 0.27 0.2 Toluene ug/g 3.1 0.2 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 6.5 0.2 p-Xylene ug/g 10 0.2 m-Xylene ug/g 24 0.2 o-Xylene ug/g 13 0.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g 470 10 (Gasoline) TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. method. Individual constituents by Modified EPA method 5020/8020. As Received Basis Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102