HomeMy WebLinkAboutUST REP. 1996BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME:
ADDRESS: ~
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROmCT NUMBER:
DATE: NAME:' CHGD: COMMENTS:
PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE:
I
.,,,, /,~.~, S. PC.C FACILITY PLAN 'WORLD OIL CORPORATION
1999 E~N HIGH~Y. ~lT[ 20
8-[.s~,[Lo. c*L,~o.,,, ~== "'- ~c WEST TANK FARM, PR ODUCT SALES 9502 SOUTH GATE
. TELEP~NE (805,~2~-826~~ ~fvs
C~LTING ENGINEERS '* F~NDAT~N 8 STR~T~ EKINEERING ~ LAND PLANNING .... o,,~ ~a~. I SUNLAND REFINERY BAKERSFIELD, CA.' SOUTH GATE CA. 90280 ~" '
' . ~ //~ ~C. ~
Io0ol
_~ ,, i .' ..
// / / / - /
. ..,~.~ ~.~ ~ / / ~ / / -'
.......... S.~CC FACILITY PLAN WORLD OIL CORPORATION
.,::..,~o..,~.su,,,zo '' '-- J:'~- J I SOUTH TANK FARM.* REFINERY 930Z SOUTH GATE
C~TING ENGINEER5 + FOUNDAT U RINO ~- LAND PLANNIN~I""°~P J' ' SUNLAND REFINERY' BAKERSFIEL~CA. SOUTH GATE CA. 9'0280
· * LEGE,VD '
' :' =~ ..... "' '~'""" ~- ' ' ~ '~ ¢--- ¢ ¢7- -, ( ' %~ ' '~ ' -' '
'i'. -~ ~' ' '. .~ , ' %" ._. ¢ , ' ~-- .~ . ~%% .~ · ~ . :
> · . ,,, . , · %- · ~ ~ ~ . . ~.; . . .
.'~ . .
· :,- ~ ~ ,. ~.' - 5~'~'-~- ** ~ '~, ' ,,'"'.. 'x /~ '"~ ':~-~ . · - '.
/ -
~ ,: '-:7: .' '~ ~
' ,. I ,' . .~;.'. ..~:;:..: ... - x, ~/ . .,.~ , ~ ~ ~ ........... . ........ / . ,. -~ '.,,
~~- ~ -%.:.. -.~ ~~ .
· ",- .... ,.,.:: ' "'"' ' '" ' * ' ' ' ' '" ~'"~"'~'~¢ ' '~ ' ' -':' " "'{, b. ",
i:'.', ~li:~.-~lll:-":~ '. i,./'.'~.. '-'.: ' ,' ~, r : .~Nw ~A' S:C :~'~-:~::':~:~~:~ ~:.~-' '.' -:i:~::: X ..-
: . .~1.r ~... ,~.~.,. .~.. ?~..,,,.a, ~ ~" ". ~ ,~,,~ ~ '.x-~l' ']]' ~ 5 ',~ '~,,'
' ~, ~-, ' ~'~--% .... =---~ 4~ x .. ,-¢¢ ' '. ,- ~ ~ , ,,~m---%q .... ~ ~
· :1, ~J L. " . --~'.~ '~" ~__ t' ' · ~1,.,:I~~':,~~,,~ ~~- ~'~L~:L_!~ I~[~' i~, . ~ ,,
-,.. ', ,- ~ ' - ,- , - - ' ,,~-- - ' , , L'~:',_':~_'~,',_:.-~ ---~i--:-~.--~, -~ '
~ ~~- ~ j~ / ~. ¢%,
/ ' . ' · , .... · ~- --~~ '.' - ' ./_. ' ,. x'
-:. ~ %' . :-: ~ ....
e i,c,,,,~' /~o. -'~ l, o.c.,,,~. ; S. PCC FACILITY PLAN WORLD OIL CORPORATION __
~999 E~SON HIGHlaY, SblTE 20 ~
a-~,sFl~o, c~,~o..~ s~o~ .... ~c NORTH TANK FARM 9302 SOUTH gATE
TELEPHONE (805) 327-8267
C~LTING ENGINEERS~FOUNDATION~STRUCT~ ENGINEERING '~ LAND PLANNING .... ov[~ ', SUNLAND REFINERY *BAKERSFIEL~CA. SOUTH gATE ea 90~eO
GREEN ACRES
~ U ~4,~C'~ W,4LL
" NORTH TANK FARM
SEE SH.
~ ...... O H TANK F u ~ REF ERY
1999 E~SON HIGHWAY, SUITE ZO [
TELEPHONE (805) ~2T-8267 ~
C~LTING ENGINEERS ~ FOUNDATION 8 STRUCT~ ENGINEERING * LAND PLANNING ,,,.o,t~ ~a~ SUNLAND RE FINERY' BAKERSFIEL _
Lr~' Postage '$ '
-" · 1.90
Q- Certified Fee
'~ postmak
Retum Receipt Fee ]...~0 Here
(Endorsement Required)
Rest~cted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement'Required)
r--I Total Postage'& Fees
ICn I Reciplent'e Name Piease Print Clearly) (Tobe complet~ed by mailer)
'i:'----------L~..~...~~ .............. ............. : .... ~ .... -; ....
I"-- ts~t~t~-~tt; T~C
I~ [ 207
· Complete items 1, 2, and 3. A so complete A. Received by (P/ease Print Clearly)
item 4 if'Restricted Delivery is desired.
· Print your name and address on the reverse
so thai we can return the card to you. , C. Signature
· Attacl~;:his card ~ the back of the mailpiece, v~-"k .... ~) ~,_ i-I'~,gent
or on the front if space permits. ^ ~4~,,~ Addressee
1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1.? /~ Yes If YES. enter delivery address below:~] No
A&S ENGINEERING INC
207 W ALAMEDA SUITE 203
BURBANK CA '91502
.- 3. Service Type
~ Certified Mail [] Express Mail
~ [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise
[] Insured Mail [] C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes
2. Article Number (Copy fr~m service label) _
7000 0520 002! 9625 5002
PS Form 3811.,'iJ_uly 1999 .: : ' Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789
UNITED ST,~I'ES POSTAL SERVICE First:Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS ~.
Permit No. G.-IO
· Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box ® '~'
OFFICE OF ENVIRO19~F~AL SERVICES
1715 CHESTER AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
OIL CORP.
Via FedEx Overnight
Mr. Emil Batch
Sunwest Productions
10200 Meacham Road
Bakersfield~ .CA 93312
Re: UST Removal Requirements
Former Sunland Oil Refinery
2152 Old Coffee Road, Bakersfield
Dear Mr. Batch:
It has come to the attention of World Oil Corp. (World) that you attended a meeting with the Bakersfield
Fire Department on February 13,2001. The purpose of this meeting was to address the removal of the two
underground storage tanks associated with the crude oil production wells located on World's property at
2152 Old Coffee Road. As owner and operator of the oil production.facilities, it is your responsibility to
properly remove the tanks as requested by the Bakersfield Fire Department in their letter dated January' 26,
2001.
Based On a recent conversation with Steve Underwood of the Bakersfield Fire Department, World was
informed that in place abandonment of the two underground storage tanks was acceptable to the Fire
Department. This method of tank closure is not acceptable to World Oil Corp. World requires that the
UST's be properly excavated and removed from the property. In the event that soil contamination is
encountered during tank excavation, remedial efforts must be employed to mitigate impacted soils related to
the thnks to levels acceptable for closure from the Bakersfield Fire Department.
Please provide notification to World regarding the schedule and method by which the tanks will be removed
from the site. World's environmental conSultant, The Source Group, Inc., will be present onsite during tank
removal activities. Therefore, we request that you provide 2-day advance notification to World prior to the
tank removal activities
Please direct all correspondence and questions to my attention at the letterhead address and feel free to
contact me at (562) 928-0100.
Sincerely,
WORLD 011, CORP.
John P. Hundley, R.G.
Vice President, Environmental Affairs
Cc: Christine E. Mirabel, VP & General Counsel
' Steve Underwood, Bakersfield Fire Department
9302 SO. GARFIELD AVENUE, SOUTH .GATE, CALIFORNIA 90280-3896
P.O. BOX 1966, SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA 90280-1966
TEL. (562) 928-01 00 · FAX. (562) 928-3234
SUN-EMIL BATCH-FEB 16, 2001.doc
I..q Postage $ o 3~
'-Q Certified Fee ~[ · C~ 0
Return Receipt 'Fee ]. .~0 Here
~ (Endorsement Required) '
t--t Restricted Delivery Fee
r'~ (Endorsement Required)
r~ Tot~ postal'& Fee~ $ 3.74
H FU FRe¢iplent's Name ~please Print C~earljf) ~To be Completed by mailer)
! ~o~oo ~c~ ~o~ -- ........
C~,,~ete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A.
it if Restricted Delive~ is desired.
Prin"~r'your name and addr~ess on the reverse ~
so that we can return the card to you. [] Agent
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
i or on the front if space permits, address different from item 17 [] Yes
, 1. Article Addressed to; If YES, enter delivery address below:
! Mr. Emil-Batch'
, Sunwe;~t Production Co.
[ 10200 Meacham Road .
' Baker~..sfield, CA' 93312 ~. Se~iceType
~ ~ ~ Certified Mail [] Express Mail
I, '~ I, [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise!
[ ' [~1 Insured Mai~ [] C.O.D.
- 2, Article Number (Copy from service label)
10 0520 0021 9625 4753 '''"10259~
~81 I, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt
UNITED STATES POSYAL-SERIIit, E - ~..-'-'"',~ First-Class Mail.
(~,- ~ivl '~'1 11 11~1 I PermirNcr~"--
' Sender Please pri~yo}ur~m~;'address, and ZIP+4 In th,s box I ..........
!
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ]
1715 CHESTER AVENUE ' I
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 ~
CJal~-~Zete-items 1, 2, and 3. Also comp ete
it .l~ if Restricted Delivei~ is desired.
. Prin-[your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you. ~-~ignature
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ' X ..... ~ [] A~ent
I ~.ls delivery address different from item 17 [] Yes
1. Article Addressed to:
I -- If YES, enter delivery address below:
Mr. Emil "Batch,.
Sunwest Production Co.
I- 10200 Meacham Road
, Baker~sfield, CA 93312
I ~ 3. Service Type
! ::[] Certified Mail [] Express Mail
' [] Registered [] Return Receipt for M,erchandise
[] Insgred Mail [] C.O.D.
I ("~--~ / '~/5'"2- (~-~:~- -;~~) 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
7~.~0 0520 '0021 9625 4753- · .~
PS I ~3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789
April 5, 2001
Mr. Emil Batch ..
Sunwest Production Co..
10200 Meacham Rd.
[~RE C.~EF Bakersfield, CA 93312 ' CERTIFIED MAIIJ
RON FRAZE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Re: Failure to remove two (2) Underground Storage Tanks located at
2101 "H" Street 2152 Old Coffee Road, Bakersfield
Bakersfield, CA 93301
VOICE (661)326-3941 .
FAX (661) 395-1349 NOTICE OF VIOLATION
SUPPRESSION SERVICES
2101 'H" Street SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE
Bakersfield, CA 93301
.VOICE (661) 326-3941
FAX (661) 395-1349 Dear Mr. Batch:
PREVENTION SERVICES
1715 Chester Ave. During a meeting held in this office on Wednesday, February 28, 2001, you
Bakersfield, CA 93301 had committed to removing two (2) Underground Storage Tanks located at the
VOICE (661) 326-3951
FAX (661)326-0576 above-mentioned address. As of this writing you haVe failed to comply.
ENVIRONMENTAL1715 ChesterSERVICESAve. Accordingly, you are in violation of Section 7902.1.7.2.3 of the Uniform Fire
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Code (1997 edition).
VOICE (661) 326-3979
FAX (661) 326-0576
· "Underground tanks which have been Out of service for a
TRAINING DIVISION
5642 VictorAve. period of one year shall be removed from the ground and the
Bakersfield, CA 93308 site restored in an approved manner."
VOICE (661) 399-4697
FAX (661) 399-5763
Therefore, Prior to May 5,2001, you shall bring the referenced facility into
compliance with all applicable underground storage tank codes administered
by this office. Failure to comply with the provisions of the code may
necessitate legal action, including, but not limited to misdemeanor citation
and/or injunctive relief.
In addition, all work performed must be done under a permit issued by this
office. A qualified contractor must be hired for the tank removal and a
qualified company, or person, must be present to take samples.
Mr. Emil Batch
Sunwest Production Co.
.Re: 2152 Old Coffee Road; Notice of Violation
Page 2
Thank you in advanCe for your anticipated cooperation; and, should you have
any questions concerning this Notice of Violation action or require further
information, please feel free to call me at (661) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Ralph E. Huey, Director
Office of Environmental Services
by:
Steve Underwood; Inspector
Office of Environmental Services
SBU/db ~
cc: Walter Porr, Assistant City Attorney
John P. Hundley, World Oil Corp.
S:~April200 IX2152 Old Coffee Rd.wpd
· Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired..
· Print your name and address on the.reverse C. Signature
so that'we can return the card to you. D Agent
· Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X [] AddreSSee
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 [] Yes
1. Article Addressed to: if YE~S, enter delivery address below: ~ No
Mr. Emil Batch .' '
Sunwest Production Co.
10200 Meacham Road
Bakersfield, CA 93312 3. service Type .~:~:~:.;,*i:~.'.~'!~".~;~=.~:.~!;~f~i!?~;,:~i ,
~] Certified Mail I-I Express Mail
[] Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise
' ~ Insured Mail ~ C.O.D.
2. ~icle Number (Copy from se~ice label)
7000 0520 0021 9625 4753 i
PS Form 3811, Ju~y_1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789
Ltl Postage $
~ Certified Fee 1 o 10
r~ Return Receipt 'FeE *Postmark
ILl (Endorsement Requim~ 1 o 10 Here
r'3 Restricted Delivery Fe,
I-3 (Endorsement Require(
i' I'-! Total Postage & Fees $ 2.54
ru
~ rReclplent'a Name '~iea~e Print Clearl o be eom '
F.-i ~ $treet, Apt, No.; ;'r'~'~"~'~'~l~'. ................ . ......................
r-,; 9302
· Complete items 1, l/3. Also complete
item 4 f Restricted desired.
· Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the Card to you. ~ C. Signature
· Attach this Card to the back of th~mailpie~,"- :- (~
or on the front if space permits. ~ ,.
-------- ! ~__.,~. I'-IAgent I
~ ~0~ ~~ ~~ ~ ...... . ,,um~teml? ~Yes
~~~ I, ~ES, enter dehve~ address below: ~ No
9302 S C~IE~ AY
~ ~ Insured Mail ~ C.O D
4. Restricted Deliver? (~tra Fee)
I 2. Adicle Number (Copy from se~ice labeO ~ Yes
, PS Form 3811, JuJy 1999
Domestic Return Receipt
102595-99-M.1789
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE I First-Class
~°ostage & Fees Paid
. ~SPS
"r'Permit No. G-10
· Sender: Please print your name;' a~ldress, and ZIP+4 in this box ·
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
January26,2001
FiRE CHIEF
Mr.
John
RON ~:R~E nunmey
World Oil Corporation
ADUINISTRATIVE SERVICES 9302 S: Garfield Ave CERTIFIED MAIL.
2101 "H".Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301· ~' ' South Gate, .Ca 90280
VOICE (661) 326-3941
FAX (661) 395-1349
SUPPRESSION SERVICES RE: 2 Underground Storage Tanks That Are Not Permitted and Do Not
2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Meet Code
VOICE (661) 326-3941
FAX (661)395-1349
~REVEm~ON SERViCeS NOTICE OF VIOLATION
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakerstield, CA 93301
VOICE (661)326-3951 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE
FAX (661) 326-0576
Dear Mr. Hundley:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
VOICE (661)326-3979 This office has made extensive inquires with the Division of Oil & Gas,
FAX (661) 326-0576 with regard to original ownership of two underground storage tanks
located on World Oil property. This undertaking has yielded little results.
TRAINING DIVISION
5642 Victor Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
VOICE (661) 399-4697 Clearly, the tanks are located on your property and as code requires, it is
FAX (661)399-5763 World Oil Corporation's responsibility to remove them.
These tanks located well # Armstrongl and Smoot #3 do not conform to
underground storage tank regulations as adopted by CCR Title 23,
Division 3, Chapter 16.
These tanks are also in violation of section 7902.1.7.2.3. of the Uniform
Fire Code (97 edition).
· "Underground tanks which have been out of
service for a period of one (1) year shall be
removed from the ground in accordance with
section 7902.1.7.4 and the site shall be
restored in an approved manner."
Therefore, prior to February 26, 2001, you shall bring the referenced
facility into compliance with all applicable underground storage tank
codes administered by this office. Failure to comply with the provisions of
the code may necessitate legal action, including, but not limited to
misdemeanor citation and/or injunctive relief.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation; and, should you
have any questions concerning this Notice of Violation action or require
further information, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3979.
Sincerely,
Ralph E. Huey, Director
Office of Environmental Services
by:
Steve Underwood, Inspector
Office of Environmental Services
SBU/dm
B A'K E R S F I E L D
FIRE DEPARTMENT
November 20, 1996
FI~ CHIEF
MICHAEL R. KELLY
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
2101 'FI' Street MI'. DavidTroop
Bakersfield,cs05) 326-3941CA 93301 Regional WaterQualityControl Board
F~x (~) a~-13~ Central Valley Region
3614 East'Ashlan Avenue
SUPPRESSION SERVICES
2~Ol *H' ~t Fresno Ca 93726
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3941
FAX (~)~9~-13,~9 RE: Preliminary Site Assessment Data for 1850 Coffee Road, Underground
Condensate Knockout Tank Removal
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Troop:
(805) 326-3951
FAX (805) 326-0576
Enclosed, plea~ find a copy of our agency's acknowledgment that the
ENW~ONMEm^LSE~V~:ES removal activity and associated assessment has been completed. The information
171,5 Chester Ave. ·
Bakers~eld, CA ~3301 is being forwarded to your attention to be included as part et'the overall
(805) 326-3979
FAX (805) a26~76 remediafion project file for the site.
TRAININGDIVISION IFyouhave any questions, please give either me or Ralph Huey a call at
5642 Victor Street
Bake~t~eld. C^ ~a~ (805)
326-3979.
(805) 399-4697
FAX (805) 399-5763
Sincerely,
·
Howard H. Wines, 1II
Hazardous Materials Technician
HHW/dlm
enclosures
BAKERSFIELD
FIRE.DEPARTMENT
November 20, 1996
~N~r,~a sa, am City of Bakersfield Public Works Department
1501
Avenue
21m -H-s~ee, 't mxmn
~,a~. CA 9~1 Bakersfield, Ca 93301
(805) 3264941
RE: Underground Tank Removal at 1850 Coffee Road
SUPPIIISSlON SB1VICIS
2101 'H' Street
Bak~e~O. CA 9~01 De, ar Mr. R.oj~s:
(805) 326-3941
FAX (805) 395-1349
The preliminary site assessment information on the underground torage
~m~mON ~c~ tank removed fi-om 1850 Coffee Road (previously Sunland Refinery) 1~ b~
5a~ersfielct, CA 93301 received by this office. Although the test reports do indicate hydrocarbon
(805) 326-3951
~,x (~) 3~6.o~ impacted soil under the tank, the contamination will be handled as part of the
overall site remediafion project undertaken by Sunland Refinery and over.~.,'n by
m~N~tm^l ~m:u the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfiela. CA 93301
(805) 326-3979 The preliminary site assessment information, along with our
FAX (8O5) 32643576 ·
· correspondence on this site, is being forwarded to the Regional board. A~ the
TRAINING DIVISION local-implementing agency, we consider the removal of the underground storage
~2 w~o~ s~, tank on this site and the associated documentation, to be complete.
Bakersfiela, CA 93308
(80,5) 399-4697
?AX (805) 399-5763
If you have any questions, please call me at 326-3979.
Sincerely,
h E. Huey
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/dlm
cc: David Troop, Regional Water Quality. Control Board
Ronald F. Ruettgers, Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District
FR~M .~9. 16.
LABORATORIES
L~L S~S
63~5 SNO~ ~ ~te ~Lved: 08/30/96
~F[~, ~ 93308,
Attn: B~LL ~SZ~ 39~*0246
$~le Description: ~FFEB
Method
Constituent~ ~ Units P.O.L. Method
Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons 12000. mt/kg . 3000. EPAo418.1
~ .",;
Note: P~L's. were raised due eo high concen:ra~io'n cf targe~ analy~es .requiring
CaLifornia D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
,, ...
Department SUperv's°r
A1 results Ifs~ed bt ~e repo~t ire ~er th~ fxcfiiJlve use of (he subedttJfuJ party. 8C Leboratede~, inc. usumes no ~ fo~ rq)(~t aflerafio,, se~eratk2~, dee g tNd pray InfdqvmlJoe.
,4 'l ~ Ar. Joe ~-'c. · ~er. er,s~'ielcf, CA 9:~:3OE~. (ESC)~) ::~,T.?-,49'11 * FAX CES~ :3~7-q 918
LABORATORIES ;age
Tot~ ~ectole~ ~oc~ns
~L S~S. Da~e Re~ed: 09/12/96
6315 SNO~ R~ Da~e Received: 08/30/96
At,n: BZ~ ~SZ~ 39~-0246 - ·
S~le Descrip~ion: ~FF~B ~. T~:* 2~ ~T SZDE S~ BY ROSZ~
S~ple ~tr~x: ·Sot~ Date Collected: 0~/30/96 · 11:35~
Da~e ~xtra~ed- 8020: 09/09/96
, DaCe ~al~zed- 8020: 0~/09/96
Practical
Analysi · Reporting Quan~i=a= ion
Benzene None De=cc=ed ~.g/k~ 0.2
Toluene None DeCecced ms/kg 0.2
Ethyl B~zene None Detected m~/k~ 0.2
To=al Xylenes None ~etected ms/kg 0.3
Su~oga=e % Recove~ 100. % ~0-130 ~..f,-:.:.~ ~-.; ~
TEST ~OD: TPH by D.O.~.S. / L.U.F.T. ~ual ~th~ - ~ified EPA 8015
Individual constituents ~ E~A ~=h~ 5030/8020. ~%~.~':'-*;':.:~:~:: ~:.:*::. ' ~
~:.~".:. .~"~' . . ....
-
No=e: PQL's vere raised due Co high ccncen=ranion of hydrocarbons present
s~le dilu=~cn.:
· ~r ~-~ :?~:': ':;~: ";:;:"Y':[~
Ca
-.,.,.~; :: .: .: :::~ 7~t:.?~.:.~ .. '., ,.;~:: ::~. ~
., ...... :.
.... %. ;;;r~
· .. :: - x~'..~ ~',;:~::.~ ":~",,'.;
~e~hod
Constituent? Sample Results Units P.O.L. Ke~hod
Total Recovecable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons 5600. mi/kg 3000. ~PA-418.1
..,~ .:
· ,~',~;.. '.:;
.....
'~. ":'
'..~ .'. ~ '~-:'~,-~ .
~o~e: PQL'S were raised due ~o high concen~raei~ of targe~ anal~es' re~irin~
s~le dilution
....... ~:- '~
Califo~ia D.O.H.S. Cer=. ~1186 '~'~=' .
415 A=Iee C=. , Be~e~fielO. CA
LABORATORIES ];,age
~u~gea~le
Total ~eC~ole~ ~Td~ocaL'~ons
r.~T~ SE~C~S -. Date Red.ed: 09/12/~6
6325 S~w R~ Da~e Re~i~d: 08/30/96
~FIE~, ~ 9~308 5~orato~ ~o.:
S~e ~tr~x: Soll Da~e Collected:' 08/30/g6 ~
Date ~acced- 8030 = Og/Og/g6 '.
DaCe ~lyzed-~020: 0~/09/~6
Practical'
Analysis Reporting ~P-,anti~at i on
Constituents Results Unltq Limit
Benzene None Detected n~/kg 0'[ 3
Toluene Nor. e Detected ms/kg 0.3
E~hyl Benzene N~e ~tec~ed ~/kg 0.3
Total Xylenes None Detec=ed ~/kg 0.~
TEST ~OD: TPH ~ D.O.H.S. / L.U.~.T. ~ual ~th~ - ~dified EPA 8015
~ndivid'~l c~s~i~uents ~ EPA Ne~h~ 5030/8020.
· , "~.::~?~.'.: , ;
%:-...:
~ .~ ',,,~ ·
~o:e:~'8 ~e~e ~se~ due
s~le dilution.
-,.. ::..,
s:~== ~. ~==~ ~,,~,;,,,~ .,.;...?~:~;~ .~7i~: '::' '"' :"
41~ A:Ia3 Ct. · 8mke~fielO.
F~CM ~9,16,1~95' 08s.~3 HO,- I P, 8
LAI~RATORIES Page
Tota~ ~etroleum
LUT~3LSERVZCES Da~e Reported: 09/11/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Da~e Received: 08/30/96.
BAI~FZE~,' CA ~93308 ~raCo~o.: 9g~10178-3
~n: BZ~ ~Z~ 399-0246
~thod
Constttu~n~ S~le ReSults · Units ~,O.L. ~eth~
Total Re~ver~le Petrole~
Hydrocar~ns. 3300. mg/kg 2000. EPA-418.1
~.,~. . ':%,:
~o~e: PQL's were raised due co high concert'.ration of target analyCes re~irin9
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~llS6
Department S~e~i sot '==/":: ~ .~.~..:
41 $ A~s ~. · ~skersfiel~. CA
FiROM . a9.,I,$ ~,995 eg~29 NO. I P 4
LAE~RATORIE$ Page
~urgeable A~c~aticm
?~cal' Petroleum Xydrocacbonm
~~ZE~, ~ ~3308 T~a~o~ ~0.: 96-10178-3
A~: ~:~ ~gZ~ 39g-O2A6
S~le Desc~ipCi~: CO~E ~, T~: ~' ~8T SIDE ~
S~le ~ix: Soil Dang
'Date .ExC:acCe~- 8020:
DaCe ~lyzed-8~20:
Practical
Arialys is ReDorging Quan
~ Results ,, Units
~enzene N~e Detected mg/kg O.
Toluene N~e De~ecced mg/kg 0. 005
~thyl Benzene N~e De=ec=ed mg/kg 0.005
~o=al XTlenes N~e De~ec~ed mg/kg 0.01
Surrogate % Recove~ 83. % 90-130 :.'?~,:~)',:.""."' '~
Individual c~scicuenCs ~ E~A ~ech~ S030/8020,
LUTI~L SERV~CKS Date Repo~ted: 09/11/96
6:315 SIK)W ~. ~ate Recei~d: 08/30/96
~P[~, ~ g3308 · ~ato~ No.: 96-101~8-~
S~le DescriptOr: · COF~E' ~. T~: 6' ~ SZDE ~ BY ROSZ~
S~l~ng Da~/T~: 08/30/96 ~ 11:45~
Met,~od
,Constituents ~amp].e Results Uni~.~ ~ Method
To~a~ Recoverable
Hydrocarbons 2 0O 0. rog/kg 10 0 0. ~RA- 418.1
~oce: ~h's were raised due ~o high concentration of car~ec analytes re~i~in~
ffRCN 09.16.[996 $8~3~ HO. ! P. $
LABORATORIES
Puzge.~ble Aromac~.cs
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
LUI~t~ SERV/CE$ , Date Reported: 09/12/95
6315 S~OWROAD : Date Received: 08/30/96
BAKgRSPXELD, CA 93308 La~oratory
~ttn: BZ~ ROS~
S~le-Descript~: CO~EE~. ~: 6' ~ST SIDE~D BY ROSZ~
S~le ~ix: Soil Date Collected: C8/]0/96 · 11:~5~
Date ;xb~cCed-8020:'09/10/96
'. Date ~lyzed'8020; 09/10/96
P~acCicaZ
~lysis ~o~in9 ~titation
Constltu~n~s Re~lts Units
~enzene N~e De=et=ed m~/kg 0.00S
Toluene N~e De=acted ~/kg 0.00S
Ethyl Benzene N~e ~tected mg/kg 0.005
To~al Xyl~nes N~e ~ec~ed ~kg 0.01
Surrogate % Recove~ 91. % 70-130 ~f~.?:~.:"~
In.vidal constituents ~ EPA Meth~ 5030/8020.
WA~E DESCRIPTION -- ~ ~ GENERATING PR~ESS /' - '-, ..... "
COMmNEN~ O~ WASTE ' ' 'PP~ ~ CO~NENTS O~ WASTE .~' p.~ ~ '
/HANDLING INS~CTIONS: · ' ' .~ .
THE' ~NE~TOR CERTIFIES THAT I . ~ ~ ~
ITHE WASTE AS DESCRIBED IS 100%1 ~ IJ ~ . ~ __~ ~.
~PED OR PRINTED F~LL NAME & SIGNATURE DATE
. EPA I
~. ......
· .~: :--~-.'.. __
--~-~...'.~-' · Double D Rec~lin~ . . _ _~:'*:.
· ,.,':" ;'" 340 D~nie~ L~ne P.O. Box 7050~ Invoice No. 1
:': :..i:.' E~ke~eld, CA g3307 CA Cert~_ carlo2 No~ RC 5782 '-,
'" Nsrl~ ' -- '
":':'~.. . .~. ^~mss ..
.... "'" .....~- Vehicle License
· ::q:.-~:,i:.., .-., -
· ~ TARE _~'
LBS.- DESCRIPTION BASIS* ADJ PER LB. AMOUNT
ALUMINUM
COPPER
BRASS
.....- . RADIATORS
.. :'i::::':".-":' :,:'::. /'~ ?GO IRON
j.~,:., . v.
""' ' '" ,GLASS
PLAST10
ALUM. OANS
....................... TIN ............................................. : ..........................
BODIES
OTHER
· ' TOTAL.
// -
WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following described commodity was weighed, measured, or counted
by a weighmaster, whose signature is on this certificate, who is recognized authorib/of accuracy, as
prescribed by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 12700) of Division 5 of the California Business
and Professions Code, administered by the Division of Measurement Standards of the California
~" · Department of Food and Agriculture.
'B A K E R S F I E L ~D
FIRE DEPARTMENT
~ November 20, 1996
FlEE CHIEF
MICHAEL R, KElly Mr. Raul Rojas
ADMINI~3~'I: ~RVIC~ City ofB&emfield ~b~e Wor~ Dep~ent
2101 'H' ~t 1501 T~ Av~ue
(~) 32v39~ B~ersfidd, Ca 93301.
~: Under~o~d T~ Remov~ at 1850 Coff~ Road
SUP~N SE~
2101 'H"
~, c~ ~ De~ ~. ~oj~:
(~) 32~3941
F~ (~) 39~1~9
The prc~ site ~scssmcnt ~omfion on ~e ~d~o~d ~or~c
~
~,m,~o. c~,~ r~eived by ~s offi~. ~ou~ ~e tern repo~s do ~te hy~o~on
(~) 32~3951
over~ site rem~afion proj~ ~de~en by S~d Re~ ~d overs~ by
mw~ma~ ~ the Re~o~ Water ~ ConSol Bo~d.
Boke~field, CA 9~1
(~5) 32~3979
F~ (~) 32~76 The pre~ site ~ssment ~omfio~ ~ong
co~esponden~ on
~INING OlVI$10N IOC~ ~plement~g ~en~, we ~nsider the remov~ of~e ~der~o~d ~or~e
~2 Victor Strut
BakersfielO. CA 93~ t~ on tbs site ~d ~e ~sociat~ docmentafio~ to be compl~e.
(8~) 3~-~97
F~ (~) 3~-57~
~you Mve ~y questions, ple~e c~ me at 326-3979.
S~cerely,
' ~dous ~tefi~s Coor~tor
cc: David Troop, Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ronald F. Ruettgers, Greater Bakersfield Separation of Grade District
Double D Recyclin l
:~:~.~:~'"~:':: ~' ~~ld, CA ~7 CA ~cafion No. :RC 5762
:;'. ?" .~ ... ..
':::~:-':..: ~, ~: :.'. ' Name ~ .........
.,.-~..~ ..,, ', ·
.
:-'.:;..
: ?:-,. %; .:. .....
~' ':'~:"~:'"';'~L~. DESCRI~ION BASIS* ADJ PER LB. AMOU~
: ;~ ~ .'" ALUMINUM
': -:~?': :" ~"'~" BRASS
~?~O. IRON
GLASS
~:~':;,-'. · PLAS~C
:: ..... BODIES
· OTHER
TOTAL
: (C) ~MMI~LED (~P) SC~P
' ~EI~HMA~ER CERTIFICATE
~' ~lS IS TO CER~ ~at ~e foiling de~ri~ ~mm~ ~s ~igh~, measured, or ~unt~
by a ~ighma~er, ~ose signa~m is on ~is ceffificate, ~o i~ r~n~ed au~ori~ ~ accuracy, as
pm~r~ b~ Chapter 7
and ~ro~o~ion, ~, administered b~ ~ ~i~sion o~ Moa~ur~mont ~ndards ~ th~ Gali~mia
'?" ' ~pa~ent ~ F~ and Agdcul~re.
~ ~ .' ~E~E~TI~' ~OOES~'~~'R'~ ~E'~.. -,..
"(: .:.l. ~. :il ':l~'l'??::?' ." .... {lll l., ".' '':>:I'?L{I ~''''l~: : .:..l'~ ' ' l'l "''l' 5~:''
DESCRIBED IS 100%J- ~ Jj ~ . ~ j ~ ~ ~:
~PED OR PRINTED F~LL NAME & SIGNATURE ' ' DATE ~-': '
. EPA
~' ." ":~,::~:-' .' '.' ' -' : . :~.;' ., EPA
..... 2-:~ .: ?'~:? .,~: ~.::. ~,?. Al.::,.:.1 .......
~~RE'~'~;~'~-~S??~ :.-~ .... ~ - '- ''-- P ~ TEDF~ N" ~1 N ...... ~' "-~'~';~' :."?~-'- ' "~?.;~'?"~ ........... "' .....
~?< .. : .... ...... ~ .... ~,~ , ~. .- ..,~.A~RE .... . ...... ,.~ ....... . , ~ ,~.~ ~.~:~.~. DATE ' -
~..~,.,1 .... ' .: - . . , ....... ~:-,.~ :, ,: .... ~,~?~'~::~::~Z,.,~/,' M'~.~'~.~e~?: ::,~','~"LC~'~'~'%:"~?'~'~:~,~'~:,',?I1
F~O~ 09.16.I996 08{)4 ~0. I P.
LABORATORIES Page Total Petroleum Hydroc&rb~ne
LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 09/11/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: '08/30/96
BAKeRSFIeLD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.= 96-10178-&
Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 · · ·
Sam~le'DescrlPtion: COFFEE RD. TANK: 6"WEST SIDE SAMPLED BY ROSICA
.!
S~m~01ing Date/Time: 08/90/96 · 11:4~AM
Method
~on~t~tu~nt~ ~ample R~$ul=~ U~it~ ~.O.L. Me~h__~
Total ~ecoverable Petroleum
~ydrocarbons " 2000. mg/kg 1000. ~PA-418.1
...... Note:-- P~L'-~ were ~a'~se¢ d~e ~o h~gh concentra~ion-o~--~ar~e~ analyte~ requ~n~ .......
~ ~Rs h~ ~ this m9~ ua for t~ exctu~ uu ~ ~ s~ ~. SC Ln~ra~es, l~ assume{ flo ms~ns~ty ~{ ~p~ ~er~, ~ralofl. ~tochm~ or ~l~ ps~ ~temretntion.
*' ~
FR~M 0~.16.1~6 0~ HO. I P. ~
LABORATORIES Page 1
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
LUTREL SERVICES i Date Reported: 09/11/96
6115 SNOW ROAD , Date R~ceived: 08/30/96
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 ~ Laboratory No.: 96-10178-3
At:n: BILL ROSICA 399-0246
Sample Description: COFFE~ ~D. TANK: 2~ W~ST SIDE SAMPLED BY ROSICA
Sampling Date/Time: 08/$0/96 · 11:&lAM
Method
Co~.ttu~n~s S~mple.Resul~s Uni:s P.O.L. Method.
Total Recoverable Petrole~un
Hydrocarbons 3300. ~g/k9 2000. EPA-~18.1
Note': PQL~_s were raised due co.high ¢oncen:ration of-target analytes requiring s~01e dilution.
41 ~ A:!es ~. · Bakersfield, OA
FROH 89.16.1996 88=33 NO. ! P. ?
LABORATORIES Pa~e ~
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
L~TREL SERVICES Date Reported: 09/11/96
6515 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 08/30/96
BAY~RSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-10178-2
Attn: .BILL ROSICA 399-0246
Sample Description: coFFEE RD. TANK: 6' ~AST SIDE SAMI~D BY ROSICA
Sampling Date/Time: 08/30/96 ® 11:37AM
~ Hethod
Constituents SamPle Resul~ Units P.0.L. Meth94
Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ~ 5'600. mg/kg 3000. EPA-418.1
Note: PQL'~ were raiae~ due ~o high concentration of target analytes requiring
s~01 e dilution. '~[~:~f~;;~:,~-: ~' ~i~; ~ C '~?;,~;:~mm .......... 'r'~'~' ....... "'
Cal~forn{a D.O.H.8. Cert. ~i86 "~// ~. -
~ ~ A~IGe C~, ~ Beke~iela, ~A 9330S, C~) 3~-~-~1 ~ · FAX [~] ~7-1 ~ S
LABORATORIES Page
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
LUT~L SERVICES Date Reported: 09/11/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Date Rece£ved: 08/30/96
~3~KERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-10178-1
Attr~: BILL ROSICA 391-0246
sample Description: COFFE~ RD. TARK: 2' ~AST SiDE SAMPLED ~Y ROSICA
Sampling Date/T/me: 08/30/96 ~ ll:)SAM
~thod
Constituents ~ S~u~31e Results Units ~.O.L, Method
Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons 12000. n~g/kg 3000. EPA-41S.1
Note: ~QL's were raised due to high concentragi6n o~ target anal~es re~irin~
Ca,'fornia D.O.H.S. Cer~. ,1186
41~A~Ia$ OG..~ ~eKersfield, CA
FRCM 09.16.[996 08~30 NO. 1 P..5
LABORATORIES Page
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum HydroCarbons
LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 09/12/96
6315 SFOW'ROAD Date Received: 08/30/96 .-
BAKERSPIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-10178-4
Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246
Sample Description:. COFpEE RD. TANK: 6' WEST SIDE SAMPLED BY ROSICA
Sample Matrix: Soi'l Date Collected:
Date Extracted-8020: 09/10/96
Date Analyzed-8020; 09/10/96
Practical
........... /~alysis Reporting Quantltatlon
Constltuent9 '' ReSults _ Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/k9 0.005
Ethyl Benzene / None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Xylenes None Detected m~k9 0.01
Surrogate % Recovery.' 91. % 70-1~0
TEST 5~THOD: TPH by D.O.H.$. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 503'0/8020.
FAX [~] ~7-~ 9~ ~
FROH , 09.16. ~996 08~29 NO. I P. 4
LABORATORIES Page 1
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum l{ydrocarbons
LUTREL SERVICES Date Reported: 09/12/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 08/30/96
B~d~.ERSFIELD, CA 93308 Laboratory No.: 96-10178-3
Attn: BILL ROSICA 39'9-0246
Sample Description: COFPEE RD. TANK: 2~ W~ST SIDE SAMi~L~D BY ROSICA
Sampie Matrix: Sol1 Date Collected: 08/30/96 ~ 11:41AM
.Date.Extracted-8020: 09/10/96
Da~e $u3alyzed-8020; 09/10/96
Practical
Analysis Reporting Qua~.titatlon
Constituents Re~lts Un, ts Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mB/kg 0.005
To=al Xylenes None Detected mg/k~ 0.01
Surrogate % Recovery 83. % 70-130
TEST M]~THOD: TPH by D.O H.S. / L.U.P.T. Manual Method ~ MOdified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
FROM 09. 16. 1996 08:2? NO. I P. 2
LABORATORIES Page
[~rgeabl e Aromat£cs
and
T°tal Petroleum Hydrocarbons
LUTP~L SERVICES Date Reported: 09/12/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 08/30/96.
~A~RSFIELD, CA 93308 Laborator~ No.: 96-10178-1'
Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246 .
Sable Description: COFFEE P.D. T~: 2' ~AST SIDE S~MPLED BY ROSICA
Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 08/30/96 ® 11:35~!
Date Extracted-8020: 09/09/96
Date Stnalyzed-8020: 09/09/96
Practical
Analysi s Report ing ~antitat ion
Constituents . Re~plts .... Units . . Limi~ .
Benzene None De~ecte~ mg/k~ 0. ~
Toluene None De~ec~ed mE/kg 0.2
E~hyl Benzene None Detected m~/k~ 0.2
Total Xy[eaes None Detected m~/kg 0.3
Su~ogaCe % Recove~ ~00. % ~0-130
TEST ~THOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. M~ual ~hod - ~fie~ ~PA 8015
Indlvlduai constituents by E~A ~=h~ 5030/8020.
Note: PQL'S were raised due to high concentration of hydrocarbons present requtrin9
sample d~lution. :' ?: ,
41~ Atlas ~. t Bake~field. CA 9~ · [~ 3~7-4~11 · FAX [8~) 327-I ~1 ~
UdTR~L SERVICES Date Reported~ 09/12/96
6315 SNOW ROAD Date Received: 08/30/96
E~AKBRSFIELD, CA 93308 Laborator~ No.: 96710178-2
Attn: BILL ROSICA 399-0246
Sample Description: COFFEE RD..TA~K: 6' EAST SIDE SAMPLED BY ROSICA
Sample Matrix: Soil Date Collected: 08/30/96 e Ll:37AM
% Date Extracted-8020: 09/09/96
DaCe Analyzed-8020: 09/09/96
Prac~ical
~nalysis Reporting Quantitatlon
Constituents Re~ulDs ~ni t.~,. ~imit ..
Ben~.ene None Detected m~/k~ 0.3
Toluene N~e ~ected mg/kg 0.3
~thyl Benzene None ~tected mg/kg 0.3
Total Xylenes : None Detected ~/kg 0.5
Surrogate % Recove~ ~ 95 % 70-130
T~ST ~THOD: ~H b7 D.O.~.~. [ ~.~.~.g. ~nu~l ~tho~ - ~d~f~d ~ 8015
Individual constieuonts by ~l ~e~hod 5030/8020.
~ote: ~L's were raised due =o h~gh co~centra~o~ of hyarocar~.s 9re,eat re~i=iag
s~le dilutlon. '
WI resulb Ifsbd ~ tNs ~p~ are for t~ exclusive use ~ the su~ pe~y. 6¢ Laboratory. I~. asswes no res~o~sla,ly ~r ~1 alteral~, Mparatb~ detachment e~ Ihir~ pa~y Inter?relation.
41 ~ Atlas Ct. · BakersfielO, GA 833~ · (~05) 327~91 I · FAX {805) 3~7-~ 918
Official Business j;ZENAi~Ty. FOR~PRtVA~T~
OF POSTAGE, $300
Print yoUr name, address and ZiP Code here
· CItY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPT
OFFICE OF ENVIRONNENTAL SERVICES
1715~CHESTER AVENUE, SUITE 300
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
I '-- Complete items 1 and/or 2 for'additional services.
~ Complete items 3,~a & b. J also wish to receive the
r' ? Print your name entrees on the reverse of this foil, ;ervices {for an extra
~ return this card to you. form so that we can feel
.~ · Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space
does not permit.
~ 1. [] Addressee's Address
· Write "Return Receipt Requested' on the m ' '
~'~ · The Return Receint w ............. a'?lece bel°w the ar1:lcle humbert 2. [] Restricted Delivery
o~ delivered. - ...... u w,om tne art cie was delivered and the date
;onsult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed tO: 4a. Articl Number
~BILL ROSICA P-024-368-66411850 COFFEE
~ ~'U~L'--/R~CrING 4~b. Serv,ce Typ~
L.J Registered [] Insured
o~[ 315 SNOW ROitkD [~ertified [] cor~
u~ B-A~ERSFIE~) CA 93308 [] Express Mail [] RetUrn Receipt for
~ i ' · 7. -of Merchandise
~T~( ]~df~ 0 (~/ 8. Addressee's Address (Only ,,Weste~
~16' Si~natu~ .... ~ and fee is paid,
~ S Form 3811, December 1991
- ~u.s.~po: ~.~a-ase-?~4 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
· B A' K E R S F I E L D
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Bill Rosica .October 31, 1996
.,EC.~F Lutrel Trucking Inc.
MICHAEL R, KELLY 6315 Snow Road
~M,.,S.~.VES~RV,C~S Bakesfield, CA 93308
2101 'H' Street
Bakersfield,(805) 326-394CA 933011RE: Sunland Refinery at 1850 Coffee. Road
FAX (805) 395-1349
CERTIFIED MAIL
SUPPRESSION SERVICES
2101 'H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Rosica:
(8O5) 326-3941
FAX (805) 395-1349
The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for
PREVENTION SERVICES' the submission of documentation to this office related to the decontamination,
1715 Chester Ave.
BakerstJeld, CA93301 removal, disposal and laboratory analysis for1 underground tank at the' above
(805) 326-3951'
FAX (805) 3260576 referenced property.
E~V,.O.ME.TA' SERViCeS Our reCOrds indicate that you were required to submit the documentation
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfield. CA93301 to this office within five (5) days after the results are available. Since your
(805) 326-3979
FAX (805) 326-0576 underground tank was removed on August 28, 1996, sufficient time has
elapsed for these documents to have been submitted as required.
TRAINING DIVISION
5642 Victor Street
Bakersfield, CA93308 Therefore, within seven (7) days of this letter, please submit the
(805)399-4697 necessary documentation relating to the aforementioned underground tank
FAX (805) 399-5763
removal.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please call me at 326-..
3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Technician
HHW/dlm
cc: Ralph Huey
r iF. (5'/'-'' ,NVO,cE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ~S
PEFROL£E~I/ J. ~. EGBN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS COUP, ~KERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911; FAX 327-1918
BKRSH
cLIENT NO. P.O. NUMBER DATE
~9.'12-96
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD SUBMITTED ON LABORATORY SAMPLE NO.
1715 CHESTER SUITE 300 08-29-96 cJ6_10107
Attn: ' R, E, HUE¥ 326-3979 '. SUBMITTED BY
BAKERSFIELD,, CA 9:3301 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
TERMS:
NET 30 DAYS PAGE I . ·
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE UNIT AMOUNT
1 'SO1 SLUDGE SAMPLED BY R. HUEY
SAMPLES: 1
1 ORGANICS: 'EPA 8015 - Fuel Fingerprint, 106 140.00 140.00
DISPOSAL CHARGES
DISPOSAL CHARGES
5.00
$14§. 00
RECEIVED -
HAZ. MAT. DIV.
PLEASE REFER TO THE INVOICE NUMBER ABOVE WHEN MAKING YOUR PAYMENT.
THIS IS YOUR INVOICE -- WE DO NOT ~TEM~ZE AGAIN
'-- INVOICE NO.
~ETROLE~. J' ~' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS COUP, ~KERSFIELD, ~MFORNIA 93308 PHONE327-4911; FAX 327-1918
BKRSH
CLIENT NO. * ' eO. NUMBER DATE '
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD SUBMI~ED ON ~BORA~RY SAMPLE NO.
ttt~: I.E. HUE~ 3~-3979 SUBMI~EDBY
BAKERSFIE~ 'CA 933ez CZr~ 0F
TERMS:
NET 30 DAYS PA~E .. 1
QUANTITY DESCRI~ION OF SERVICE UNIT AMOUNT
Z 5el - SLUDGE
sAmPLES:
I ORGANICS: EPA 8015 - Fuel Fingerprint, 106 140.00 140.~
DISPOBA~ BAMP~E
1 DISPOSA~ SAMPLE 5.00
$145. ~
PLEASE REFER TO THE INVOI~E NUMBER ABOVE WHGN MAKING YOUR PAYMENT.
THIS IS YOUR INVOICE -- WE DO NOT ITEMIZE AGAIN
LABORATORI EE S, I N C. '
September 11, 1996
R.E. HUEY
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
1715 CHESTER SUITE 300
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
Subject: Laboratory Submission No.: 96-10107 &'96-10184 Samples Received: 08/29/96, 08/30/96
Dear Ralph,
The samples (s) listed on the Chain of Custody report were received by BC
Laboratories, Inc. 08/29/96, 08/30/96.
Enclosed please find the analytical data for the testing requested. If you
have any questions regarding this report please contact me at (805) 327-4911,
Any unused sample will be stored on our premises for a minimum of 30 ~d~.~.~
(excluding bacteriologicals) at which time they will be disposed unless'~$~therwlse
requested at the time of sample receipt. A disposal fee of $5. per sample may
apply for solid sample matrices.
Please refer to ~ubmission number 96-10107 &
' assistance.
·Sincerely,
BC Laboratories Inc
· RECEIPT FORM -
/~ ~ 'C~c.~ RECEIVED Y' ~
Federal Express ~ UPS ~ Hand Delivery e Chest ~ ~~~'
BC Lab Field Service ~ Other ~ (Specify) ~ Non~~ ..... Other ~ (Specify)
SAMPLE CONDITION
°C Ice ~ Blue Ice ~ None~~' If temperature is not between 2 and 6 °C please explain:
Temperature
Custody Seals: Ice Chest ~ Containers ~ Non~~
All samples received? Ye~o ~ All samples intaCt? Ye~No ~ Description match COC? Ye~.No
SAMPLE CONTAINERS
QT PE UNP
QT INORGANIC M~ALS
PT INORGANIC M~ALS
N FORMS
SULFIDE
~ox
COD
PHENOL
TRIP BLANK
VOA VIAL
O~L &
0~O~
RADIOLOGICAL
BACT
507
508/608/8080
525/625/8270
8 OZ. JAR
32 oZ. JAR
~.o rn pleted by: ~, IF:\W P60\D AT A~DO C S~SHE] LAH~FORMS~SAMREC .FRM
LABORATORIES
Page
EPA 8015M
Fuel Identification / Quantitation Summary
CITY OF BA/~ERSFIELD Date Reported: 09/10/96
1715 CHESTER SUITE 300 Date Received: 08/29/96
BA/{ERSFIELD, CA 93301 . Laboratory No.: 96-10107-1
Attn: R.E. HUEY 326-3979
Sample Description: SO1 SLUDGE SDAHPLED BY R. HUEY
Sample Matrix: Sludge, Liquid Date Collected: 08/29/96 ® 10:15AM
Date Extracted: 09/04/96
Date Analyzed: 09/06/96
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 40000.
Aviation Fuel None Detected m~/kg 40000.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 8000.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin /
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 8000.
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 8000.
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 8000.
JP 5 None Detected .mg/kg 8000°
JP 8 None Detected mg/kg 8000°
Kerosene / Jet'Fuel None Detected mg/kg 8000.
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 8000.
Crude/Waste Oil 240000. mg/kg 40000.
Hydraulic/Motor Oil None Detected mg/k~
WD-40 None Detected mg/kg
Surrogate % Recovery 121. % 64-137~
METHOD: 8015M DOHS LUFT MANUAL
Boiling Range: 70 - 300 C
Mixtures of 'hydrOcarbons are identified by a b a '~'~%~"~?'~"'~' ~f~n'ge~r~nt.'
Hydrocarbons that fall within a boiling range bu~ ~Ot ,he patte~:~are
~antitated versus the fuel that corresponds with boiling but af~alified~
with' a note. ~*~~
Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes re~iring
s~ple dilution.
California_D_O.H.S. Cert. _~~ 186
Stuart G. Buttram
Department SUpervi s'or
All results lis?ed in this report are for the exclusive use of the Submitting partY. SC Laboratories, Inc. ~ssumes no ~esponsibillty for report alteration, separ;~tion, detachment or third party interpretation. -
- - 41 O0 Atlas C~. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 32~491 I · FAX (805) 327-1818 --
iBC EABORAT~ORIES INC. ~1~ ~~----~AMI~RECEIPT FORM-R.v. No. 2-1,/s5
,,F~,,. ..~-~ (..~[o/~ ~'"~ .~,w.,~ ~: t~p~.~ .=,w.,~ ~o ~:1 .~,v~.
SHIPPING SPECIFICATIONS SHIPPING CONTAINER
Federal Express ~ UPS ~ Hand Delivery ~
Ice
Chest
Box_
~ Other ~ (Specify) Non~ Other ~ (Specify)
BC
Field
Service
SAMPLE CONDITION
Temperature °C Ice ~ Blue Ice U NoneS.. If temperature is not between 2 and 6 =C please explain:
Custody Seals: Ice Chest ~ Containers ~ None ~
All samples received7 Yes~No ~ All samples intact7 Ye~o ~ Description match COC7 Ye~o
~ SAMPLE CONTAINERS
=~ QT PE UNP
i} PT PE UNP
QT INORGANIC M~ALS
~ PT INORGANIC M~ALS
~[ CN
'~ N FORMS
~ SULFIDE
,~ NO~O~
=~1TOC
TOX
COD
~ PHE,OL
~ TRIP BLANK
~) VOA WAL
:~ OIL & GREASE
~ ODOR
RADIOLOGICAL
BACT
5~
~ 507
~ 508/608/8080
'~ 515.1/8150
i 525162518270
~ 547
'~ 531.1
[548
:~ 549
=~ ~IQC
~" QT AMBER
; 8 OZ. JAR
; 32 OZ. JAR
~mme~a:
~mpleted by: IF:~WP60~DATA~DOCS~HBLAH~OffiS~REC.Fffil
LABORATORIES ',
'Page
EPA 8015M
Fuei Identification /_Quantitation Summary
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD Date Reported: 09/10/96
1715 CHESTER SUITE 300 Date Receivedi -09/01/96
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Laboratory No. 96-10184-1
Attn: R.E. HUEY 326-3979
Sample Description: 501 SLUDGE
Sample Matrix~ Soil Date Collected:. 09/01/96 ® ll:37AM
Date Extracted: 09/04/96
Date Analyzed: 09/06/96
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Light Naptha None Detected mg/kg 3000.
Aviation Fuel None Detected mg/kg 3000.
Stoddard / White Spirits None Detected mg/kg 600.
Heavy Naptha / Ligroin / '
Petroleum Benzin None Detected mg/kg 600.
Gasoline None Detected mg/kg 600.
JP 4 None Detected mg/kg 600.
JP 5 None Detected . mg/kg 600.
JP 8 None Detected mg/kg 600.
Kerosene / Jet Fuel None Detected mg/kg 600.
Diesel None Detected mg/kg 600.
Crude/Waste Oil 8100. mg/kg 30~00.
Hydraulic/Motor Oil None Detected mg/kg
WD- 40 None Detected mg/kg
Surrogate % Recovery 92. % 64-13~
~THOD: 8015M DOHS LUFTMANU~
Boiling Range: 70 300 C
Mixtures of ~drocarbons are. identified ~ a
~d~carbons that fall within a boiling range :he ~
~antitated versus ,the fuel that corresponds with but
with a note.
Note:PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes re~iring
sample dilution. ~??~
Stuart G. Buttram -
Department Supervisor
.. 4100 Atlas CC. · Bskeesfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-491 ~ · FAX [805) 327-1 918 - ! .
Ba~eg~teld, ~ 93301
(805) 326-39~9
T~ ~~ INSPECTION FO~
O~R ps~' TO O~E~T~
co~c~o~ co~c~.
~O~TO~Y ~ OF S~PLES :"
TEST ~ODOLO6Y
P~EL[~Y ASSESS~ CO. CO.ACT PERSON
.CO~ ~CIEPT LEL% 0~% -
PLOT P~
CONDITION OF TANKS
CONDITION OF PIPING
CONDITION OF SOIL
COMMENTS
./~,~m~, /~a_. _ .... ~ _
DATE INSPECT01~ NAME
.~,kKERSFTELD FTRE DEPARTMEI~. _
'~..~~S ~A~ERIAL DIVTSZO
2130 G St. reeC,
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
T~ ~OV~ INSPECTION FO~
FACILITY -.~ow[r~ ~,~.~. ADDRESS ],~"'~ ~.,~'~o ~
O~R / PE~IT TO OPE~T~
CO~CTOR ~/~ CO.ACT PERSON ~,'[I ~,~ ,
TEST ~ODOLOGY ~k ,~ .~x~ f , ~/ ~i ~~ ~ ~ -/ ' '
PRELI~ARY ASSESS~E~O. ~ CONTA~ PkRSON
CO: RECIEPT LEL% 0:%
PLOT P~N
CONDITION OF TANKS
CONDITION OF PIPING
CONDITION OF
DA~
R ~ "'~ "'"" i Analysis Requested
eport lo: ~ P-. ~-tt.,,z.,.f
>" ,,,,~ ~, ,~, ~,¥~roject:
Addr~ess: ~ ~L~-~ A~¢Project ~: ~ ~ --
O ~ [~ Sampler Name:
City: ,;~K~, ~
State: ~ Zip: .>~1 Other:
~ ~ zo
A~n: ~ E : ~ O
Phone: ,~¢ ~S-~%
Lab¢ Sample Description Date ~ Time Sampled
~,Gnature~ -- .;Received by: (Signature)' Date: Time:
~ Address '
¢~ ~ ~ Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
'~¢A ~/~/~ City~ ~ ~ State t. ~ _
A~ention: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Time:
Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Sample Disposal P.O.ff ~ Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
~ BC Disposal ~ 5.00 ea.
~ Return to client
'""~ '¢ '~ "' ~ 1. Analysis Requested
Report To. ~;. c.. /*, ~'~:,':,
....... -.. ~,¢D Project:
.Name:,,/ ... ",~' ?~
Address: 1Zt ¢. ¢~j ~¢;Project ~:
City: ~ ,~:;¢.~ . ' . Sampler Name:
State: ~ ¢} . Zip: ~3~¢ [, Other: ~ ~ · o -- o
zo
Phone:_~ 2 ~ '
Lab~ Sample DeScription Date& ~ime Sampled
; -
' '~omment: , Rel~auished by: (?gnature, Received by:' (Signa, q[e). ¢
COH~ ,b~' ~o,-,,~. Name: '~' fl~.~"-/
. , ~. R~l[nq~[sh~8 bY
% a~'~' ~ "~'~ Address t7i.~ ('!~ ': '
;>~. 44.. ,t. ,"~ 2~ City ~ k-~ 4 · State ~ ~ Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
' ~/t~'~. · ~.' ~¢*~ ~ '' Time:A~enti°n: ~ [,; ,~ ~%~ Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
, Sample Disposal P.O.ff Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Ti.me:
¢~BC Disposal ~ 5.00 ea.
-- ~ Return to client .
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTHEN?
%Z~S MATERIAL DIVISII
2130 G Street,
Bake~sfteld~ CA 93301
(80§) 326-3979
TANK RF.~OVAL ~NSPECT~ON FORN
FACILTTY ,%,::.l~,~..,], ~,~,a,_ ADDRESS ,~ ~~
O~R / PE~IT TO OPE~TE~
CO~CTOR ~.~,~ CO.ACT PERSON
~O~TORY ~ OF S~PLES ~ ~~
TEsT ~THODOLOGY x ~
PRELI~ARY ASSESSMENT CO. ~Z~ CO'ACT PERSON
CO: RECIEPT /~ 'LEL% ~
PLOT P~N
/
CONDITION OF PIPING
CONDITION OF SOIL,~_F~_~
PERMIT APPLICATION FO_E;gEMOVAL OF AN i!i /~i~' '
UNDERGROUND STORA~ rANK .' i I~1~' PERMIT No.'
UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANK PROGRAM
$11[ Sunland RefSnerF ADD,riSS Coffee Road ZlP COOfi 93312
FACI[I~NAM[ City of Bakersfield CROSS$1~fi~I BrSmhall
MAILING ADDRESS CI~ · ZIP CODE
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
COMPANY~e['Z~uc~n~, Eric. PHONENo. 399-0246 LICENSENo. 668440
ADDRESS 63~5 Sno~ ~osd CI~ ~e~s~[e[dZIPCODE 93308
INSURANCE CARRIER' Ve~e~ Insurance WO~KMENSCOMPNo.~-9546003320
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION
COMPANY ~u~e[ T~uc~n~ Eric. PHONE_No. 399-0245 LICENSE No.
ADDRESS 63T5 Snow ~osd. Cl~s~e~s~e[d ZiP CODE 93308
INSURANCE CARRIER , Ve~e~ insurance WORKMENS COMP No. ~9546003320
TANK CLEANING INFORMATION
COMPANY~u~e[ T~uc~[n~ Inc. PHONENo. 399-0246 ..~
ADDRESS 5315 Sno~ ~o~d Cl~s~e~s~e[d ZIP CODE 93308
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 0825.
NAME OF EINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILITY Ess Ys[~ss ~e~[ne~T
ADDRESS S~snds~d S~ee~ CI~ ~s~e~s~[e[dZIP CODE 93308
FACILI~ INDENTIFICATION NUMBER
TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
COMPANY ~u~e[ ~c~[n~, Eric. PHONENo. 399-024~ LICENSENo. 568440
ADDRESS ~315 Snow ~o~d CI~ ~e~sE[e[d ZIP CODE 93308
TANK DESTINATION Co[den ~e He~[
TANK INFORMATION
TANK No. AGE VOLUME .. CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED
1 30+ yrs 10,000 Blowdown ~m~Ao~ 1965-1995 Unknown
~[i::iiiiiii[~[!i;[ii~[i::iii:~iii~?~ii~:?~i~[~[~ii[i[~ii:??~i:?::i~i~i~?~i::.~:-iii!~iiiiii:?~?~:i::.~i:i~:~i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:::::i~:i:i~:~:~::~:~:~:~:~:i:i:i:i~:~:~:~:~:~::~:~:ii![i::~i[~iiiii[iii:~[i[i:?~i!i~i~[[f~fi[?:::[i:~!![~![!~[i[[[?~::i[i~i~i[i~i[i[i[i[i~i~i;i[i~:~[:[i~i~i~i~i~i[i~i~i;i~i~i~i~!~i~;:~:~:~:~:[:i:[iii[~i:i:!:i~[i!~??~i[[[ii::~i?:??:?~[i::!::!ii~i!i~[~[~[~iiiii.:ii??~?:ii?~i:!~i[ii?~::iiii:~?~[i::~ii[i?:ii[i~i~i[i[i~i~i~i[i~i;.:~i[i[i[i[i[~i~ii[i!
TIlE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, 'UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE AT[ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER
STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
'THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY; AND TO TIlE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
/~ R(7~/~ APPLICANT NAME (PRINT) APPLICANT SIGNATURE
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
Make checks payable to "City of Bakersfield" -..
-- ST~ATE OF CALIFORNIA - Environmental Prot~ ' PETE WlLSON~r
" CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
'CENTRAL VALLEYREGION /'/- K.~' '. ~--~,
3614 East Ashlan Ave. ~ ~ ' " ''
Fresno, CA.93726 ; '
PHONE: (209) 445-5116 ' ~/?~~'
FAX: (209) 445-5910
Mr.. Robert Bimai, President
Sunland Refining Corporation, HAZ.'IvlAT. DIV.
P. O. Box 1345
,: Bakersfield, CA 93302 -'
...... NOT!CEOE~IOLAT!ON~ $_U_NLA-ND~ ~REFI ~IG_CORPORATION :.~ >._
-" A recent Staff inspection of thc Sunland Refinery ,undyou in violation of waSte Discharge
Requirements Order No. 90-086 (WDRs) because :he wastewater discharge tO your disposal ponds
~grossly exceeded the .WDR Discharge Specificatk B.5. effluent limits for EC, TDS,~and chloride.
As you have been previously notified, you also co: itinue to violate Order No~ 90'086 by failing to
submit complete monthly monitoring reports.' The: attached inspection report describes the f'mdings
of thednspection and file revieW..
We have informed You on numerous OCcaSions th~ yqur discharge exceeds .WDRs effluent limits~'
'and requested' that you take Cdrrective action. A ~ 31ati0n notice Sent on 26 Ockober 1994 informed
~you that the violations must cease, yet you contint e to grossly exceed WDRs effluent limits. It is
~, likely ithat the discharge has de'graded ground Wht~:r beneath th9 pond~.
We have repeatedly warned that failure to submii ~ :omplete reports is a violation of California Water
: ~ Code Section 13267, andthat failure to submit re[ 3rts is a misdemeanor subject to remedies under
' Section. 13268, including Administrative Civil Lin fility of $1000 per each day that we have not
received a complete report. You have not provide a report that includes required flow and
.sampiing datasince December 1994, despite an a 3arent ongoing discharge to yourwastewater
disposal ponds.
.You are, therefore, to provide, by 15 September )96~ a tabulated report which provides all flow
and sampling data for the discharge to the dispos~ ~ ponds since January 1995, broken'dowa by
' month, week, and day. You must also provide a t{,,clmical report, by .15 September 1996, that fully
characterizes the discharge to the disposal ponds,: acluding the cause of the EC, TDs, and chloride
exceedences. ,The ~report shall.include a'salt balan :e for the last'year, with calculations, and include ·
a professional assessment on the fate and transpor of the salt load.. The rePort mus~t also~ describe,
. 'in detail, corrective action taken to ensure .that fun re monitoring reports ~will be submitted on'a..
timely basis and WDR effluent limits will be met. ' '
The above' due dates are for our administrative pul )oses only and do not relieve y6u of accrued
potential liability under Water Code §13268 for f~ ling t° submit reports in 1995 and 1996. Should
civil liability be assessed, your )otential liability ,0 fill be baSed on the original due date of,each
report. ~ '
Mr. Robert Bimat, Preside~ . -2- . 21 August 1996
If you have aqy questions,regarding .this letter or our obserVations on the pond discharge, you may
contact Kevin Long at (209) 445-'6187. For questions regarding assessment and remediation of
hydrocarbon Contamination of soil and groundwater at the. facility? contact David Troop at (209)
488-4389. -, .f
WILLIAM H. CROOKS.~ "'
ExecutiveO ~ ' , . ~: .' ' :' ' ~
S pep4~i '
u ng Engineer-
-,.-~- .R,.. , .. N ,,. 24-105- .: · ..... --._
'
c: Greg Olsen, U.S. Environmental protection Agency, Region 9, San Francisco
John Mitchell, .Kern County District Attorneys Office, .Bakersfield
Kern County Environmental Health SerVices'Department, Bakersfield
· .City of Bakersfield Department of Public Works, Bakersfield . '
L,,"/Ralph Huey,:City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield'
Charles F. Weiss, Esq., Latham & Watldns, Los Angeles
World Oil CorpOration, c/.o: The' Prentice,Hall Corporation System, Inc., sacramento
~. OFF~CE NO: ClLITIES INSPECTION REPORT
INSPECTOR: ~
: PCA S~tem Task No.
R,nl=nd R~flnin~ Cn~mflnn Fnd~ele
NPDES NU~R A~NCY S~ ,, FACIL~ S~E~
~ (~) ~ AGE~ C~ ~D ~A~ FACIL~ C~ ~D STA~
SCHEDULED INSPECTION ~TA Rnhe~ Rimer ' Pet Redfn~
' AGENCY CO'ACT ~SON ~ ONS~ FAClLI~.CO~ACT PERSON
ACTU~ INSPECTION DA~ ' ' AGENCY PHONE NO. ' ' ' '
. S ' Ins~on agenw'(State = S, State I EPA Joint = J) .
· If this ins~ion is a Complian~ Ins~ion of an NPDES fadl~, send a ~py. of this rePo~ to SWRCB's D~ision of Water Qual~,
Pr~ram Suppo~ Un~.
INSPECTION ~PE (Check One) *
~ A1 X "A' ~ ~m; )liana' - ComprehensNe ins~n in ~ samples am taken. ' (EPA T~ S)
B2 "B" ~ ~ml )lian~ - A ro~ine nonsampling i~i0n. (EPA ~ C) .'
02. Non~mplian~ ~llow-up - Ins~ion made to ve~ ~e~ion of a previously ~dentifi~ violation.
03 Enfor~ment follow-up - Ins~ion made to ~ ~at ~nd~ions of an enfo~ment a~ion am ~ing met.
~ .. Corn in resPon~ to'a ~mplaint. *'
05 Pr~uirement - Inspe~ion made to gather ~fo. relate to preparing, m~ing, or res~nding r~uimments.
~ M~llaneous - Any ins~ion ~ not me~ a~ve.. '
If this is an EPA ins~ion not ~n~n~ above, plea~ no~e ~.
(e.g. - biomon~odng, ~do~an~ audA, diagnostic, etc.)
~Y~)
Y Were VIOLATIONS noted dudng this inspection? (Yes/No/Pending Sample Results)
'N Was this a Quality Assurance-Based Inspection? (Y/N)
N Were'bioass~ay samples taken? (N = No) If YES, then S = Static or F = Flowthro~gh.
INSPECTION SUMMARY (REQUIRED) (100 character limit}
SUNLAND FAILS TO' SUBMIT MONTHLY MONITORING REPORTS.'
DISCHARGEEXCEEDS EC, TDS, &.CHLORIDE LIMITS.
INSPECTOR'S DATA:
.For Internal Use: Reviewed b~;: (1). ' (2) ' (3) ' '
WDS Data Entry Date: ' Regional Board File Number. Reg WDS Coordinator
~ ' * *FACILITIESs~mc.INSPECTIONoo~ ~=v~ REPil)T
VIOLATION (IF APPLICABLE),
· VIOl. AT]ON TYPE? (A-G) . ~ (See page~ IK0'$.0. and IK0S.¶ of the Micro Waste Discharger System Users Manual)'
DATE OF vIoLATION (YYMMDD): 96 07 17 DATE oi~ VIOLATION DETERMINATI(~N(YYMMDD): 96 05 28
DESCRIPTION (200 CHARACTER LIMIT):- " ~ "
SUNI,AND REFINERY HAS NOT $UBiYI]TTED [TS MONTHLy MON[TOR[NG REPORTS
SINCE THE REFINERY SHUT DOWN~ ALTHOUGH. DISCHARGE TO PONDS CONTINUE5
DI$CI-I~RGE EC, TD$~ & CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS. EFFI,UENT I,[MITS.
· EPA SUGGESTED INSPECTION CHECKLIST :
(S= Satisfactory, Ma Ma~lnal, U= unsatisfactory, N.~ Not Evaluat~l)
S..-- Permit' U Flow Measurement N Prstmatment ~ ' U' Operations & Maintenance
· n , 'Record/Reports N* ., Laboratories - U Compliance Schedule~s N .Sludge Disposal
-U~ FaCility Site Review U EffJReceiving Waters ' U · Self-Monitoring Other
1 OVerall Facility Operation Evaluation (5= Very reliable, 3= Saflsfacto~/, 1= Unreliable)
HISTORICAL INFORMATION:
MOST RECENT ORDERS: ,. MOST RECENT INSPECTIONS: ' MOST RECENT VIOLATIONS:
ORDER NO. DATE ~;2p_T.~ TYPE DATE INSP~ TYPE ~ VIOL. TYPE DATE "
95-702 . 95 04 27 C&A 95 02 14 A1 Y C 95 02 !4
90-086 90'03 23 WDR .~ 94 05 05. A1 Y . D 94 05 05
77-252 77 10 28 . WDR 93 05 06 At Y C 93 05 20
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, sPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, ITEMS FOR FOLLOWUP ON
FUTURE INSPECTIONS, NOTES, ETC. (Attach'a~iditionaipages, if necessary)'
On 17 JUly 1996 1 conducted an Unannounced inspection °fthe percolation/evaporation disposal ponds at the
Sunland Refmeryin Fruitvale. Refinerywastewater and the disposal ponds, are regulated Under Waste Discharge
Requirements Order No. 90-086. My purpose was to ascertain whether the refinery was discharging wastewater,
and, if so, to ascertain whether discharge from the refinery to the disposal ponds met the requirements of the
WDRs. Sunland Refinery has exceeded its effluent limits on numerous occasions in the past, and previous
' inspection reports have documented probable ground water Contamination caused by the discharge, In addition to
chronic problems in meeting its discharge limits, Sunland has also shown itself incapable or unwilling to Submit
comPlete monitoring reports on a timely basis. Despite at least 27 letters and threats of enforcement over the last'
'ten years, Sunland has rarely submitted a report on time, and it has only seldom submitted a complete rePort. On
30 March. 1995, a fuel storage tank at.the Sunland Refinery blew. up, killing two.people and shutting down the
refinery. Given the circumstances, Sunland's assUr~ces that !t was.no longer discharging, and the sudden increase
in regulatory, involvement by other agencieS, no enforcement was initiated.
FACILITIES INSPECTION REPOB.T
~-~'ReB O01 ~EV ~.01)
i'arrived at the site at 1:00 p.m. It was a hot and sunny 102 degrees. I had expected to make a
. quick confirrnation that all of the POnds were empty and that there was no discharge. However, I
was surprised to see that clear water was being discharged to Pond 1, the spray aerators were
Operating, ponds 1 and 2 Were full, and Pond 4 was about half-full: I have no'idea what,
specifically, the discharge was from, since the refinery was shut down, but a field EC meter
indicated a conductivity of 4,800 pmhos/cm, way over the WDRs EC limit of ECso~,~c w~,er+ 500
pmhos/cm (Based on historical source water monitoring data, source water EC is about 250
gmhos/cm). I collected samples from the outfall to Pond 1, placed them in a Cooler, and
delivered them't° BSK laboratories in Fresno the following morning for BTEX and standard
minerals analysis. Partial reSults from BSK indicate a discharge EC of 5,000 pmhos/cm, TDS of
.2700 rng/1, and chloride concentration of 1200 rog/l: Benzene, Ethyl Benzene, Toluene, &
Xylene were non-detect. Sunland's WDRs specify a maximum TDS and chloride limit of 700
'- · rog/1 and 20-0 mg/l, respectively:*--..
Subsequent to the refinery 'shutting down in March 1995, Sunland stopped submitting monthly
monitoring reports to the Board. In mid-1995, I telephoned Mr. Robert Bimat, President of
Sunland Refinery, regarding the need for him tO submit monthly reports. Mr2 Bimat expressed
his belief that, since the refinery was not discharging, no monthly reports were necessary.
informed him that this Was incorreCt, and that unless he requested for the' WDRs to be rescinded,
monthly reports 'would still be necessary, if 0nly 'to report zero flow for the month. Md. Bimat
elucidated that he hoped to get the refinery operating again and would rectify the reporting
deficiency by submitting the monthly reports.. Several months passed with no reports being
submitted, and I' again called Mr. Bimat, reminding him of the overdue reports. -On 31 January
.1996, Sunland Refinery finally submitted its first report in nine months. The report, in the form.
of a letter, indicated.that.the refinery continued to be shut down. It also stated that monthly
reports would be .forthcoming monthly. However, the promised reports did not arrive, and
reminder letters went OUt on 28 March 1996 and 26 April 1996. On 30 April and 30 June 1996,
Sunland submitted reports ident!~cal to its 31 January 1996 report, again sta .ting that the refinery
: continued to be shut down. Sunland's three rePorts state only that the refinery has been shut '
dOwn; they fail to indicate whether or not there has been a discharge. Given the water level in
the ponds,, it's obvious that Sunland has been discharging for some time without monitoring and
reporting the discharge in accordance with Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 90-086.
On 27-April 1995, the ExeCutive Officer issued a Cleanup and.Abatement Order to Sunland
requiting it to investigate and remediate groundwater and soils affected by BTEX and other
'hydrocarbon contamination near the percolation ponds, gasoline storage tanks, main refinery, and
gasoline transfer pumps. By 15 May 1995, Sunland was to "Provide a technical report that
contains a plan and time schedule to define the lateral and vertical extent of ground water
degradation resulting from Past operatiOns at.the site" (Task 1): By 1 July 1995, Sunland was to
"Provide a technical report that contains a plan and time sChedule to identify, investigate,'and
cleanup/close all affected soils that may cause continued ground water degradation, or to
demonstrate that.s°ils do not present a threat to ground water" (Task 2).. Also by 1 July 19~5,
Sunland was to "Complete all work necessary to define the lateral and vertical extent of
Contaminants in'ground water'.' (Ta~k 3). By 1 September 1996, Sunland is to ."Provide a
technical.r~port that cOntains a plan and time schedule to contain and cleanup degraded ground
· water" (Task 4). Additional work is to be completed in accordance with the approved plan and
'schedule (Tasks 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9).
.~ *-~ FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT
*"~ SWRCB 001 (REV 5-91)
· .? ~ "' (pege4)~'
On 13 May 1996, Woodward-Clyde Consultants submitted a "Wastewater Disposal Pond
Closure Plan." David Troop Of our office revieWedthe closure Plan whiCh he dOCumented in a
memorandum dated. 16 July 1996. Of particular concern is Woodward-Clyde's conclusion that
"it is extremely unlikely that groundwater monitoring or remediation will be required solely as a
result of past pond operations." It is axiomatic that continuous surface discharge of wastewater
with an EC of 5,000 I. Lmhos/cm, TDS of 2,700 mg/1, and chloride concentration of 1,200 rog/1
will cause groundwater degradation unless impermeable layers exist.. Woodward-Clyde's
contention is not supported by the limited information provided in the 'report or recent discharge
sample results. Mr. Troop's memorandum was transmitted to Sunland along with a request for
an additional technical report, by 20 August 1996, to address deficiencies in the report, including
" Woodward-ClYde's proposal to not investigate groundwater beneath the ponds. On 20 August,
Sunland's consultant.contacted Mr. Troop and informed him that the revised report woUld be a
-' couple of dhy-s late7
On 10 July 1996, SECOR International, Inc. submitted a "Final Site Assessment Report"
intended to satisfy the requirements of Tasks 1, 2, and 3, abOve. The five-inch thiCk report is
cu'rrently being reviewed by Mr. Troop, and a draft review of the report will be completed
shortly.
SUMMARY
Sunland Refining Corporation has been.discharging wastewater during all or part of the last 18
months, WithoUt reporting flows or character of the waste as required as 'a condition of discharge.
Sunland submitted only three monitoring reports in the last 15 months despite five telephone
calls and letters, and a historY of no less than 27 reminder letters to submit reports and threats of
enforcement in the last ten years. Sunland has only rarely submitted a complete rePort (one or
more constituents have always been missing), and its last three reports fail to indicate whether a
discharge even OCcurred.. Based on Samples collected during the inspection, the discharge greatly
exceeds the effluent limits for EC, TDS, and chloride, andis probably Contributing to salt
degradation of the ground water in the vicinity of the disposal ponds. 'Contaminants have likely
been intrOduced to the groundwater by percolation from the. disposal, ponds.
BAKERSFIELD
FIRE DEPARTMENT
July 9, 1996
FIRE CHIEF
MICHAEL R. KELLY Mr. R.E. Bimat, Jr, President
Sunland Refining Corporation
ADM~NISm. AnVE SERWCES 2152 Coffee Road
2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93308
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3941
FAX (805) 395-1349
CERTIFIED MAIL
SUPPRESSION SERVICES
2101 'H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3941
AX( )395-1349 NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE
PREVENTION SERVICES
1715 Chester Ave. Dear Mr. BJmat:
Bakersfield, CA 93301 C
Road-~-
(8O5)
326-3951
It has come to our aRenfion that you currenlty own proper~ located at~850 Coffee
FAX(805) 326-0576 Bakersfield which contains at least one underground storage tank. The tank has not been properly
permi~ed and has been om of service, therefore, you are in violation of ~he following se~ons of the Uniform
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Fire Code as adopted by the Bakersfield Municipal Code, Chapter 15.64:
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfield. CA 93301
(805) 326-3979 Section 7902.1.7.2.3, Uniform Fire Code (1994 edition).
FAX (805) 326-0576
"Underground tanks which have been out of servJce for a perJod of one
T~AIN~,G D~V~S~ON (1) year, shall be removed from the ground in accordance wire Section
5642 victor Street 7g02.1.7.4 and the sJte shall be restored Jn an approved manner".
Bakersfield, CA 93308
(805) 399-4697
FAX (805) 399-5763 in order to avoid regulatory action, you must either properly permit and bdng the tank up to code,
or else apply for a proper abandonment and removal of the tank within 14 days of this notice.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please call 326~3979.
Sincerely, / /
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH~dlm
cc: John Mitchell, Deputy District A,fforney
Jim Parker, Kush Parker & Stanton
Tony Kline, Kline Wegis
RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION
Business Name:
Business Phone: F~:
Inspe~or's Name:
Type of C~I: Incoming ~ Outgoing [ ] Returned~]
Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: '~O -
) 1994 TRW REDI Property ~ta
17) Situs:2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD CA 93308-5746
Use:INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE
APN :368-070-01-00 Tax Rate Area:000-1217 Assd Land:S17,776
County: Kern CA Property Tax :$715 Assd Imp :
Census: Total Va1:$17,776
Map Pg:225-F2 Exemption : Assd Year:95
New Pg: · %Improved:
Owner :SUNLAND REFINING CORP
Mail :PO BOX 1345;BAKERSFIELD CA 93302
Last Sale Prior Sale
Transfer Date: Bldg/Lvarea:
Document # : Yrblt/Eff :
Document Type: # Stories :
Price : # Units :
First TD- : # Buildings:
Junior TD :
Lender :
Seller :
Title CompanY:
County Use:3030 Lot Size :A2.39 Pool :
Bldg Class: Lot Area :104,108
Flood Panl: - Zoning :M-3 Condition :
Flood Zone: ,
Heat : Park Type :
Air-Cond : Park Spaces: Paved Pkg :
Legal :S28 T29 R27/PTN SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 EXCL OF
TRW-REDI (C) 1994
The Page & Grid reference is copyrighted by Thomas Bros. Maps <TM>
>> Reported data believed to be reliable but accuracy is not ~uaranteed <<
- OZ -o0
' ' ';";"; ~ ,Ii!{t'I'tL'IIi¢IIIt/I{
Decem~r 22, 1995 By SECOR ! roj~t N~r K0111~24~1
Mr. DavidTr~p - ~a~"~ ~
Califo~a Regio~l Water ~li~ Consol Board
Central V~ley Region
3514 ~t As~ Avenue
Fresno. CA 93726
SI~ ~SESS~ WO~L~ ~DE~ ~ ~8~NSE TO ~
C~O~ ~ION~ WA~R QU~I~ COBOL BO~ LE~R~
NO~ER 2g,
S~d Refinlng Co.ration. B~emfield. C~o~
Dear Mr. Troop:
On behalf of Sunland Refining Corporation (Sunland), SECOR International Incorporated ($ECOR) is
pleased to present this Workplan Addendum and response to the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board - Central Valley Region (Board) letter, dated November 27, 1995, for the refinery
located at 2152 Coffee Road, Bakersfield, California. The purpose of this letter is to provide the Board
with the following:
1. An introduction to SECOR's project team;
2. A conceptual plan for future environmental activities;
3. A request for a meeting with the Board to clarify the project objectives; and
4. An updated project schedule for site assessment and remediation activities.
PROJECT TEAM
· SECOR has been contracted by Sunland to provide environmental and engineering consulting services,
serve as a path for technical conununication with the Board, and to ensure that necessary site
investigation and remediation is completed in a timely and cost-effective manner. Supported by a
large pool of experienced staff, four SECOR professionals will comprise the consulting management
team for the Sunland project. They are as follows:
· Mr. Jim Evensen, R.G., will be the Project Manager and primary SECOR contact, working
directly with the Board and Suniand;
· Mr. Richard Casias, Hydrogeologist, will be the in-house supervisor for the technical and
regulatory aspects of the project. In this position, Mr. Casias will participate in all regulatory
meetings;
· Mr. Mark Pishinsky, Engineer, will supervise the permitting, local operations, and will also
provide regulatory guidance and participate in the regulatory meetings. Mr Casias and Mr.
Pishinsky will serve as alternate contacts for Board inquiries;
· Mr. Craig Benson, R.G., will be responsible for data management and project quality control.
For this project, SECOR's Bakersfield office will serve as the base of operations. Included as
Attachment 1 is a SECOR contact list with corresponding addresses and telephone numbers.
D.27:L928.WPD SECOR
-?,'-'-~ ~.?nnt'Ho (b,s l~1'(,:'. 3'tt/lc /uI. .\~'lt'l;t~T I'(trk. (.~-I 91. :_'(;-I/. ~- ~,'¥t_l-~/ _tt~,,q_O~-76 t,~'051 .~t(),¥-(i. ;.~ 7 1':.1.\'
Mr. David Troop :-
December 22, 1995
Page 2
CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES
On December 11, 1995, SECOR personnel met with representatives of Sunland. The purpose of the
meeting was to assess the status of the project, review the project objectives, and maintain progress
toward completing those objectives. The conclusions drawn from the meeting included the following:
1. The soil and groundwater assessment can be performed concurrently;
2. Optional step-out soil borings and wells can be included in the current phase of site assessment
(Clayton Mittelhauser Workplan, dated October 1995). Step-out soil borings and wells can be
used effectively to define the outer boundaries of groundwater containing dissolved-phase
hydrocarbons (Item 2 of the Board letter, dated. November 27, 1995); and
3. In conjUnction with the ongoing assessment, soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot testing can be
conducted at the site prior to initiating the soil remediation engineering design phase of the
project.
PROJECT MEETING
At this time, SECOR is proposing a meeting with the Board to review the status of the Sunland project,
formulate a systematic approach for the environmental activities, and discuss our plan for maintaining
Sunland's compliance with the Board. If it is convenient for you, we would greatly appreciate
scheduling such a meeting for late December 1995 or early January 1996.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
In addition to the above-referenced action items, SECOR concluded that the project activity has been
moving forward, although new groundwater data will be needed since the shallow groundwater levels
have dropped to depths below the bottom of the existing groundwater monitoring wells. We
understand this phenomenon has occurred at many sites within the southern San Joaquin Valley, and
specifically in the Bakersfield area.
SECOR concurs with Clayton Mittelhauser that, if necessary, site remediation activities can be initiated
in November 1996 (Clayton Mittelhauser letter addressed to the Board, dated September 25, 1995).
However, at this time it is impossible to commit to a specific duration for any mitigation efforts without
improving our understanding of the viable remedial approach(s). Preliminary estimates indicate soil
remediation by means of SVE could require 2-5 years, depending on cleanup objectives. In response to
this issue, SECOR, on behalf of Sunland, requests concurrence from the Board to initiate limited soil
vapor extraction (SVE) pilot testing at a selected Sunland facility location. Our rationale for this
request is based on the following points:
1. No pilot testing has been performed at the site, and therefore, no design data are available;
2. The applicability and effectiveness of SVE at the property is unknown with respect to the
petroleum hydrocarbons present in the soil;
3. Immediate source abatement can be focused in the vicinity of the proposed Coffee Road
Overhead Project, sponsored by the City of Bakersfield and the Greater Bakersfield Separation
of Grade District; and
4. SVE pilot testing will enable Sunland to establish a data base that can be used to more precisely
define the cleanup duration (Item 3 of the Board letter, dated November 27, 1995).
D2?:L928.W~D SECOR
Sunland fully expects that, despite its transition of consultants, SECOR can successfully meet the
Board's objectives set forth in the Cleanup and Abatement Order under a reasonable and mutually
acceptable schedule. We will supply the Board with a detailed schedule promptly after our forthcoming
meeting.
In summary, we are proposing:
1. Accelerated site assessment be completed by combining the soil and groundwater investigations;
2. Optional step-out soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells be approved and installed
during the current project phase;
3. Interim SVE (pilot testing) be initiated in the area of the proposed Coffee Road Overhead
Project;
4. The Board meet with SECOR and other Sunland representatives to discuss the scope of the
project as soon as reasonably possible; and
5. Revising Clayton Mitteihauser's proposed September 27, 1995 schedule for closure of the soils
and/or demonstrating that soils do not present a threat to groundwater after SVE pilot testing can
be completed.
We look forward to your comments, and more importantly, look forward to a successful working
relationship with the Board.
Sincerely,
SECOR International Incorporated
James M. Evensen, Jr., R.G.
Principal Hydrogeologist
Project Manager
Attachment 1 SECOR Contact List
pc: Mr. Robert E. Bimat, Jr., Sunland Oil Ref'mery
Mr. David J. Cooper, Esq., Klein, Wegis, et al.
Mr. Ronald F. Ruettgers, Civil Engineer, City of Bakersfield
Kern County Environmental Health Department, Bakersfield
Mr. John Mitchell, Kern County District Attorney's Office, Bakersfield
Mr. Howard H. Wines, III, Bakersfield City Fire Department
D27:L9~8.WPD SECOR
ATTACHMENT 1
SECOR CONTACT LIST
1)' Mr. Jim Evensen, R.G.
SECOR International Incorporated
2824 Camino Dos Rios, Suite 100
Newbury Park, CA 91320
(805) 498-0556
(805) 498-6337 [FAX]
2) Mr. Richard Casias, Hydrogeologist
SECOR International Incorporated
1734 - 34th Street
Sacramento, CA 95816-7004
(916) 4564333
(916) 456-0110 [FAX]
3) Mr. Mark Pishinsky, Engineer
SECOR International Incorporated
5401 California Avenue, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(805) 634-9541
(805) 634-9604 [FAX]
4) Mr. Craig Benson, R.G.
SECOR International Incorporated
90 New Montgomery Street, Suite 620
San Francisco, CA 941054503
(415) 882-1548
(415) 8824406 [FAX]
D27:L928.WPD SECOR
· TABLE 3-2
Elevations and Fluid Levels
.~ September 1989
Datum Depth to Groundwater Product
Well Elevation' ~ Waterb Elevation' Thici(nessb
MW11 383.30 ' 92.35 290.95 0
MW12 384.i5 ' 89.71 294.44 0
MW13 -382.51 90.32 292.19 0
MW14 381.28 91.90 289.38 0
MW 15 384.09 '91.28 . 292.81 0
· MW16 383.94 93.30 290.64 0
~MW17 382.84 89.0 , 293.84 0
MW18 380.31 92.80 287.51 0 ~
MW19 38_2,07 93.65 288.42 0
Feet above mean sea level.
Feet below ground surface.
s,~,x~.~),~ 3-8 DRAFT REPORT
L~ . 4.0.-LABORATORY ANALYSES'
I .
~ This section presents the results of the laboratory analyses performed on soil and fluid
-J ' samples collected during this ph'ase of the supplementary subsurface investigation. During
'E., the course of this investigation the following samples were collected and analyzed:
· 37 vadose zone soil Samples
..., · 9' groundwater samples · '
4.1 Vadose Zone Samples
Each of the 37 vadose zone soil samples was analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons
(EPA Method 8015 modified for _cja__~s_oli~ne), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (EPA
~ Method 8020) and total lead. The analytical results are presented in.Table 4-1. Analytical
I'.i values are presented in micrograms per gram [equivalent to parts per million (ppm)]. The
· ~ ~ field PID reading for each soil sample is also preSented in T .e~. Appendix B presents
'the Chain,of-custody forms, the laboratory reports, and detectio~ limits for these analyses.
_ , ,, ,.'"+'-
The sample identification code (for example, BH-14-75) designates the soil borehole number·
(BH-14), followed by a dash (-) and the depth in feet below grade from which that sample
was obtained (75). A majority of boreholes were sUbsequently converted to monitoring, wells.
Boreholes and their corresponding monitoring well designations are given in Section 3.3.
As delineated in Table 4-1, the analysis of the vadose zone soil sampling revealed that:
E~ Total hydrocarbons ('l'PH)'were above the detection limit in 7 of the
petroleum
37 samples and ranged from 29.20 to 1,592.12 ppm. .
]~L.j~ · · Benzene, detected in 8 samples, ranged from 0.16 to 2.45 ppm.
· Ethylbenzene, detected in 7 samples, ranged between 0.48 and 3.70 ppm.
..L · . Toluene, detected in 7 samples, ranged between 0.10 and 1.92 ppm.
· · Xyiene, detected in 7 samples, ranged b~tween 0.10 and 2.75 ppm.
,!
"J"~.~ · · Lead was detected in 26 samples, in levels ranging from 2.64 to 18.4 ppm.
s,u~-(x~-~o~ '4-1: DRAFT REPORT
TABLE 4-1
Analytical Results fOr Vadose Zone Soil Samples--"
· , [mg/kg (ppm)]
Sample I.D. TPH Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-Xylene p-Xylene m-Xylene Total Lead
4~5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 12.2
, ND ND' ND 6.93
BH14~35 ND . ND ND ND
BH14-65 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BH14-85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.45
,,.-"~ ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 7.69
/ BH15'5 ND ND 3.27 ,,~'-)
' BH15-55 ND ND ND ND ND /~)~, -. ;")
B H 15-80 1,592.12' N D 0.32 0.22 1 ND'02 0.63ND 0.ND16 315.2.00 ·
~'~"'-'" ND ND ND ND
t ~H16-25 ND ND 18.4
~o ND ND ND
BH16-50 ND ND 7.94
ND ' ND ND
L ? ND ND .
BH16-85 ND ND
3H17-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.14
BH17-40 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 15.8
BH17-70 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11.4
BH18-50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 17.0
,/~,j ND ND ND ND ND 9.13
ND
ND
ND 8.72
BH18-55
;i ND ND ND ND
' 3H1'8-90 ND .ND. 2.91
BH-19-35 ND ND ND NO ND NO ND
i I,/ BH 19-50 ND NO NO .ND NO NO ND 3.36 v/
TABLE 4-1 (Cont.)
Sample I.D. TPH Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene o-Xylene ' poXylene m-Xylene Total Lead
BH19-85 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.86
BH19-90 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BH20-40 ND 0.16 ND ND ND ND ND -
/,=,/ . B.20-50 ND ND ND ND Uo ND ND
~ .'..,'.,'~ .' BH20_60 111.89 0.16 0.55 0.27 0.31 0.48 0.48 -
BH21-35 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND --- ~"" ~/
....it) ~' BH21-40 ND ND ND . ND ND ND ND 7.69 -
/";' ' ' BH21-60 177.82 1.13 3.15 1.57 1.46 1.55 ND ND
BH21-85 ND ' (~ ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.30
~1 ,/,' BH22-10 ,7 '~ ,,.~ ~J 0.14 ND ND ND ND ND 8.65 --
~'~I BH22-40 ~'~/, ':~/f 51.01 ~i 0.44 0.61 0.28 ND 0.29 NDN, 3.33ND -,~-"
~'-~' BH22-65 C;~,, ~-'/.~29.20 ~ ! 0.20 ' 0.48 0.24 ND 0.24
~1~ .' "\ ,., , ~. .~
~ ' BH22-85 - ~ ~_ ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BH23-50 ND - ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.88
,\{! I' BH23-80 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.48 '
V" BH23-90 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.00
BH24-60 49.82/253.00~ 0.11 0.27 0.10 0.10 0.27 0.26 2.64 -"" ~ ' ~-'
~ 4.2 Groundwater Samples ~
The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (EPA Method
F~ 8015 modified for gasoline); benzene,.toluene; xylene, and.chlorobenzene (EPA Method 602),
and organic lead. The results of the groundwater analyses are presented in Table 4-2. The
--. laboratory reports a. re Presented in Appendix C.
i Benzene was found in six WellS (Mw-12, MW, 15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, and MW-19) at
i'.---~ concentrations between 0.25 and 4'14 ppm' T°luene was detected in tw° wells' MW~15 and
MW-16, at concentrations of 0.23 and 0.49 ppm, respectively. EthyIbenzene was detected in
three wells, MW-15, MW-16 and 'MW-17, with concentrations between 0.42 and 0.55 ppm.
Xylene species were detectedin two wells, MW-15 and MW-16, at concentrations ranging
from 0.23 to 0.90 pprn.
TPH was detected within the water in 5 monitoring wells, MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-18,
and MW-19. TPH as gasoline ranged from 12.04 to 23.35 ppm. TPH as diesel ranged from
2.46 to 6.00 ppm.
~ 4-4 'DRAFT REPOR
' · ~.-~-i c._-~, ~ L__._4~ . . -'
TABLE 4-2 .
· ; .~ > ~ . Water Analysis-Sunland Refinery
· Summary of Analytical Results For Groundwater samples
TPH TpH
Ethyl diesel DBCP ' EDB Sullste
Sample Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene ' 0-Xylene . gas
Sample # Date o;Pb Benzene Toluene '
MW-11 ' 7/18/89 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2' ND1 N~i '
7/21/89 ND1 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND1
7/20/89 NDt ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 NDI' ND~
7/i9/89~ ND~ ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 ND2 NDs ND1 -
MW-15 7/21/89 ND1 2'212 0'232 0'422 ' 0'302 0'232 ' ND2 12'041 6'001 0'000244 NDe ND7
MW-16 7'/20/89 ND1 2'652 0.492 0.482 '0'522 0'902 0'552 23'351 7'271 ND4 ' NDe -
MW-17 7/19/8,9 ND1 4-142 ND2 0'552 ND2 ND2 ND2 15'231 2'461 0'000034 0'000024
MW-18-1 9/29/89 NDe 1'413 ND3 ' ND3 ND3 ND3 ND3 lJ485 '
MWJ18.2 12/12/89 ND2 0.0182 1.802 0-0192' 0.0182 0-0192 4:2611
MW-19-1 9/29/89 ND6 1.173 ND3 ND3 ND3 ND3 ND3 1.355
MW-19-2 12/12/89 ' ND2 0'0392 0'832 0'0682 0'(~382 0'0572 9'3181
Note: All values in ~g/g (ppm_....)
ND: Not Detectable
1: DOHS/LUFT ·
2: EPA 8020
3: EPA 503.1 ·
4: EPA 504
5: EPA 524.2
6: SW-7421 (Total Lead)
7: SW-9036
6.0 VADOSE ZONE DISCussION
The vadose zone is the hydroge01ogic region extending fi:om the soil surface to the top of-the
~- Principal water table. For the purposes of this discussion, it will not include the capillary
' .__ :'l fdnge. It is apparent that the depositional processes resulting in the lithologies present in the
vadose zone were dynamic and varied through time. It is also apparent that the processes
~.... operating in the spread of' the Contaminants are dynamic, reSUlting in shifts in the locations ef
· t areas of'degradation through time (Plate'1).
I The subsudace lithology at the Sunland Refinery is'dominated by gray, well graded, fine to
.... :I 'coarSe sand to a depth of 65' feet..DiScOntinuous layers of poorly graded sand, gravelly
11~-1 sand, silty sand, and silt have been.found throughout this portion of the section. Below a
depth of 65 feet the generalized lithology Consists of discontinuous, interbedded silt and
sand. The silts range from clayey silt to sandy silt and the sands range from silty sand to
·
gravellY sand..The mineralogy of.the sand and gravel is dominated by quartz and~ minor
j~ amounts of lithic fragments. Mica.is found throughout the entire lithologic section.
. With few exceptions, the lithology tends to.bec°me coarser grained from west to east at.
. depths above 65 feet. The site to-the west of Coffee Road is underlain by a relatively ..
continuous 5-fooi layer of silt at a depth of'40 feet. This silt is generally absent east of Coffee
-- Roadl The silt layer is present within boreholes MW-7, MW-9, MW-14, MW~15, MW:16, MW-
. 17, MW-19, BH-7, and BH-17. East of Coffee Road the occurrence of silt at a depth of 40
feet was found .in MW-10 and MW-11. In addition to the silt layers, numerous lenses of
gravelly sand ranging in thickness from 5 to 10 feet are found as discontinuous units'Within
lj the fine to coarse grained sand throughout the site.
· Below a depth of 65 feet, the generalized lithology consists of discontinuous interbedried
.~..~ sand, gravelly sand and silt. In general, west of Coffee Road, the site is underlain by a
relatively continuous lens of gravelly sand at depths of 70 to 85 feet. This layer was
encountered in boreholes MW-7, MW-9, .MW-11, MW. 15, MW-16, MW, 17, MW-19 and BH-7,
ranging in thickness from 5 feet to 15 feet. To the east this layer grades into fine to coarse
sand and silt in boreholes' MW-5, MW-6, MW-8, MW-10, MW-12, BH-10, BH-13, and BH-15~ ·
_~ This lens also grades into sands and silts t° the west in boreholes MW,13, MW-14 and
MW. 18.
'
6.2 Patterns of Contamination ·
The depth to the water table in Spring 1987 was approximately 40 feet below ground surface.
By Spring 1988, the water table had fallen below 60 feet and was measured in November
1988 at a depth of approximately 80 feet. As of November 1989, the water table was
measured at approximately 90 feet below ground sudace.
_. Laboratory analytical results for TPH as gasoline were plotted for three vadose zone depth
increments to estimate the horizontal and vertical extent of subsurface contamination (see
i ' Figures 6-1, 6-2 and 6-3). The three vadose zone increments were 1) shallow, from the
~ ground sudace to 30 feet (Figure 6-1); 2) intermediate, 30 feet to 50 feet (Figure 6-2); and 3)
· deep, 50 feet to 90 feet (Figure 6-3). TPH values presented for each borehole represent the
petroleum concentrations which were present at the time each borehole was drilled. A list of
the analytical results .for boreholes BH-14 through BH-24 are presented in Table 4.1 of this
report. A list of analytical results for boreholes BH-5 through BH-13 are presented in Table
4-1 of the Interim Report: Hydrogeologic, Groundwater, and Soil ChemiCal Quality Conditions
at the Bakersfield Refinery, ENSR doc.,ument 6440-004-601.
The divisions were chosen on the assumption that the shallow section would indicate
possible contamination sources, the intermediate section would indicate spreading from the
source to the former water table depths, and the deep section would reveal the spreading of
potential contamination during the drop in the water table level.
6.2.1 Shallow Conditions (Ground Surface to 30-foot Depth)
Analysis of the analytical data shows that BH-7, located within the west tank farm, had a TPH
concentration of 1679 ppm at 5 feet below the surface. In addition, BH-5 '(MW-5), located
within the south tank farm, recorded TPH concentrations of 1,302 ppm at a depth of 30 feet.
Borehole BH-10 contained residual hydrocarbons at a concentration level of 103 ppm at 10
feet. It appears that both the west tank farm and south tank farm are probable sources for
release of petroleum hydrocarbons.
6.2.2 Intermediate Conditions (3'0- to'50-foot Depth)
Two areas showed the presence of residual hydrocarbons between the 30- to 50-foot depth
intermediate zone. One area, located in the south tank farm, is defined by data from MW-51
MW-8 and BH-10. A second area Containing residual hydrocarbons is defined in the west
' tank farm and is defined by data from MW-7 and MW-17. Figure 6-2 shows the location of
· intermediate zone soil contamination.
· ~.o-oo4-r,m '6-2 DRAFT REPORT