HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 124-90RESOLUTION NO. 124-90
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 337,
QUANTICO NO. 1 ANNEXATION (WARD 1).
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield[ that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of BaKersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exh~ibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri-
tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of
Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for
benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be
annexed.
ORIGINAL
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3311, which was adopted
August 22, 1990, an Initial Study was conducted and it was deter-
mined that the proposed project would not have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration (with mitigat-
ing measures) was prepared and posted on April 30, 1990.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-.86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
ORIGII~AL
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on $EP 5 19g0 , by
the following vote::
AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS EDWARDS, DeMOND, SMITH, BRUNNt, PETERSON, McDERMOTT, SALVAGGIO
NOES. COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
ASSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS'
CITY CLERK and ES Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED $E? 5 1990
CLARENCE E. NEDDERS
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
CITY 'ATTORNEY of ~ of Bakersfield
AJS/meg
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.QUANi.1
8/27/90
ORIGINAL
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 337
(QUAN~ICO NO. 1)
A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, being a
portion of Section 34 of Township 29 South, Range 28 East, M.D.M., more particu-
larly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the South line of the North 30 feet of
the S.E. ~. S.W. ~4of said Section 34 and the West line of the East 30 Feet of
said S.E. y~ S.W.~ofl Section 34, said point also being on the existing corpo-
rate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) North 00°~4'29" East, along said west line, 30.00 feet to a ooint on
the North line of said S E. ~ S.W. ¼of Section 34, also being on the ~enter
line of Texas Street (CO. Rd. No. 1766);
THENCE (2) North 00°35'01" East, along the ~st line of the East 30 feet of the
N.E. ~ S.W. ¼of sai:i] Section 34, also being along the ~st line of Quantico
Avenue {Co. Rd. No. 11361) a distance of 528.01 feet;
THENCE (3) South 89°46'49" East along the North line of the South 52B feet of
said N.E. ~ S.W. ~of said Section 34, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Center
line of Quantico Avenue;
THENCE (4) South 89°47'31" East, along the North line of the South 528 feet of
N.W. ~ S.E. ~of said section, a distance of 825.02 feet;
THENCE (5) South 00°35'01" %4est along the East line of the Wesz 825 feet of said
N.W. ~ S.E. ~of said section, a distance of 528.01 feet to a point on the
existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (6) Westerly, Southerly and Westerly along various courses of said exist-
ing corporate boundary to the point of beginning.
CONTAINING 10.41 ACRES
4:~a_NNEX.337
ORDINAL
ANNEXATION NO, 3:5? RESOLUTION NO.
ANNEXATION OF
QUANTICO NO. I
TO THE CITY OF BAXERSFIELO
_10.4.1; ACRES
SCALE:
~00~0- ~00 400
EXISTING CORPORATE B(XJNOARY
EXHIBIT "8"
I__L I
(6)
(5] Line, W. 8~5', N.W. 1/4,
S.E. I/4, Sec. 34
P.O.B.
~ SE£TION 3
F .~0 .c} ?~ 28 E
] I
3
517o
O
PIAN FOR PBOVIDING SERVICES
Agency Which Presently
Provides Service
Check Services Which
City/District Will Provide
Upon Future Date
Annexation ( specify )
ANNEXATION NO. 337
(QUANTICO NO. 1)
Indicate How Services Provided
By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., general tax rate or special
assessment.)
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Street
COnstruction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood COntrol
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
(30~ I .ECTION )
COUNTY
C~JNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY & STATE
HIGHWAY PATROL
CITY/COUNTY JOINT POWERS
COUNTY
COUNTY
NO SERVICE
NONE
COUNTY DISTRICT
CALIF. ~ATER SERVICE CO.
PRIVATELY CONTRACTED
X
UP(IN
X DEVELOPMENT
X
NO CHANGE
X
X
X
UPON
X DEVELOPMENT
X
X
EXHIBIT "C"
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE
INSTALLATION BY DEVELOPER/ENERGY AND
MAINT. BY GENERAL TAX REVENUE
GENERAL TAX REVENUE
USER FEES
N/A
USER FEE ~
D26:ANN.337.1 -1- RTY:wrn
Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
applicant city. Location Service bevel Capacity
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
through the City Police Department located at the s/w corner
of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 5 miles northwest of
Fire-Station 41 (County) is 3/4 mile west at Mr. Vernon Avenue and
Virginia Avenue.
Parks and Recreation-Potomac Park (County) is located within ~mile.
Upon development of residential areas, neighborhood parks will be
provided in accordance with City policy.
Library-N/A
Streets-
Construction/Maintenance-The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue
Sweeping-west of Fwy. 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and
Indicate frequency and availability of
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emergency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24-hour patrol is provided in the immediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis
with response time of 4 minutes or less. The
annexation will not affect the joint powers fire
service capability.
All City parks are open to the public at
reasonable hours.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity
of the City to provide the necessary public works
services to accomodate Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel services to this area. Services will be on a
Lighting-will be dispatched from the City Yard on a regular basis for pre- regular basis and "as needed".
ventive maintenance a needed. Repair includes streets, constructed/
maintenance sweeping & lighting.
Sewer-An existing County sewer trunkline in Quantico Avenue is available
per County of Kern's Mt. Vernon-Panorama Sanitation District whereby
Wastewater is treated by the Districts plant located South of Freeway 58.
Adequate capacity exists.
Water-This area is served by the California Water Service Compal]y.
Adequate capacity exists.
Other-(Refuse) City will provide service either by City forces dispatched
from main corporation yard or by contracted franchise service.
Collection is twice-weekly.
D26:ANN.337.2
-2- RTY:wrn
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level
of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or
construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will not
affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services.
Required street improvements to be provided by applicant (Goodwill Industries)
along Quantico Avenue will cause a minimal increase to the city's maintenance
responsibility. The territory is within the Mt. Vernon-Panorama Sanitation
District boundary and will continue under district jurisdiction and service upon
annexation.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected
territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc. )? If so, would city/district o__r residents
be responsible for financing? Yes/upgrading and chanqes of public facilities in the
territory are those items to be provided by applicant because of his proposed devel-
opment project and land use upon annexation. These requirements include dedication
and construction of the adjacent east half of Quantico Avenue to city standard col-
lector width, including sidewalk and transition areas; at least one additional 9500
lumen street light; at least one additional fire hydrant; connection to existing
County Sanitation District sewer line in Quantico Avenue; adequate masonry walls to
buffer the industrial use area from surrounding residential areas; and any addi-
tional items which may arise at time of site plan review by city.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject property is
zoned R-2 PD (Medium Density Residential-Planned Development) zone in the County.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land
use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock
on property, etc. ). Prezoning divides the territory into (2) parts. The north por-
tion (4.16 Ac) is prezoned City R-2 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone and the
south portion (5.48 AC) is prezoned City M-1 (Liqht manufacturing) zone. Subject
property is presently vacant and undeveloped.
D26:ANN. 337.3 -3- ~ ~ RTY:wrn
g
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response
time, use of co~nunity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State
Highway Patrol services. Current City Police standard is higher sworn
officer per 1,000 population percentage cornDared to the County standard.
Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savings to
the owners within this annexation. No special assessments or charqes for
street swee~)ing, leaf collection, street lightinq energy costs and fire
hydrants.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and
county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in the area equals
1.087366% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax
rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total tax of the area will
accrue to the City. (Rate as shown on 1989-90 County Auditor-Controller
Tax Rate List).
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district?
if so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004298% of assessed
market value. When annexed, the total rate will be 1.091664%. (Rates as
shown on 1989-90 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List).
How will the difference in tax rates affect a building with a market value
of $50,000.00? The yearly tax would increase by the amount of $2.15 on a
building of $50,000 assessed market value due to inclusion of the City Bond
Rate.
D26:ANN.337.4
-4- ~ ~ RTY :wrn