The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES NO 99-90RESOLUTION NO.99-90 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 336, CHESTER NO. 2 ANNEXATION (WARD 2). WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu- tion as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi- zation are that the owners and residents of the affected terri- tory desire to receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be given to the territory proposed to be annexed. 6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3295, which was adopted June 27, 1990, an Initial Study was conducted and it was deter- mined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration (with mitigat- ing measures) was prepared and posted on April 20, 1990. 7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa- ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 9. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 3. Dale Hawley City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Arthur J. Saalfield City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. .......... o0o ......... ORIGINAL I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on JUL ] ] 1990 , by the following vote: AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: ECWAROS, D, eMOND, SMITH, BRUNNi. PETERSON, McDERMOTt', SALVAGGIO NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS /v"~.~J ~ ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED CLARENCE E. MEDDERS MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: AJS/meg Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" A ANEX 5 AP.CHESTR1 7/3/90 ORIGINAL ANNEXATION NO. 336 "CHESTER NO. 2" A parcel of land situate in the Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 28 East, M.D.M., in the County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of Block 632 as shown on map entitled "Map of the City of Bakersfield Kern County California" filed November 25, 1898 in the office of the Kern County Recorder, said corner also being a point on ~he existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) Departing from said corporate boundary, westerly along the north line of said Lot 1 and westerly prolongation thereof (South line of 36th St.), a dis- tance of 431.20 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of Block 633; THENCE (2) Northerly along the east line of Block 655 and prolongation thereof (West line of Jewett Ave.), a distance of 693.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 1 of said Block 655 also being a point on the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (3) Easterly, Northerly, Easterly and Southerly along the various courses of the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield to the point of Beginning CCINTAINING 15.51 ACRES 4:CH.2 EXHIBIT "A" ORIOINAL ,~,o. To29 So STRE£T (:3) (2) ~ 665 .... ~ ANNEXATION OF' ¢H£STER NO. 2 TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD EXHIBIT "0" I'~9 STREET SERVICES Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection Streets Construction Maintenance Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewerage Water Other (REFUSE) PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES (CHESTER NO. 2) ANNEXATION NO. 336 Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed (i.e., ~eneral tax rate or special Upon Future Date assessment.) Annexation (specify) COUNTY X GENE~%L TAX REVENUES COUNTY X GENE.~ TkX R~,nYENHES COUNTY NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES COUNTY & HIGHWAY PATt%OL X GENERA[, TAX REVENUES CITY/COUNTY 3OINTAGREEMENT NO CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES COUNTY X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE · COUNTY EXISTING GENERAL GAS TAX REVENUE COUNTY X GENERAl, & GAS TAX REVENBE NO SERVICE X GENERAL & GAS TAX REVENUE COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUE COUNTY (SEE PAGE 2) X USER FEES/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CALIF. WATER SERVICE CO. NO C}~NGE N/A PRIVATELY CCNTRACTED X USER FEE 4 :~tN. 336.1 EXHIBIT "C" -1- RTY:wrn applicant city. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Service Level Capacity Location Indicate location from which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered through the City Police Departra~nt located at the s/w corner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about l~miles south of the annexation. Fire-City Fire Station No. 4 is about 3/4 mile East on Bernard Street Parks and Recreation-Central Park is located within 1 mile southerly. Jefferson Park is located l~miles to the East. Library-N/A Streets-The City Corporation Yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Freeway 99 will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accommodate Public Works Department efforts. Maintenance personnel will be dispatched from the Corporation Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance and "As Needed" repair including street construction and maintenance, sweeping of streets arid street light maintenance. Sewer-The area is already connected to the City sewer system at 34th and Jewett Streets by contract agreement with the County Alta Verde Sanitatior District. The City and County have agreed on detachment of the area from the district upon annexation. Water-The territory is now served by and will continue to be served by California Water Service Company. Other-(Refuse)-When annexed service will be provided by the City by contract with a franchise collector or by City forces. Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, rec. progr~ns, etc. 24 hour patrol is provided in the immediate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis with response time of 3 minutes or less. The annexation will not affect City/County joint fire service capability. Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonable hours. There will be no reduction in the range or capacity of the City to provide the necessary Public Works Services to this area. Service will be on a regular basis "As Needed". Adequate capacity exists. Adequate capacity exists. City refuse pickup is twice a week. 4:ANN.336.2 -2- III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emergency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc. )? The annexation of this territory will not affect near term level or capability of the City to provide needed services. A major portion of the area (8 acres) is now being cleared of existing residential structures for construction of a new elementary school by the City School District. The remainder portion is a small established built-out area. The project may or may not required additional City Police Officers to maintain the current level of city police protection. IV. Would city/district reck]ire any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.)? If so, would city/district o__r residents be responsible for financing? The City will not require any upgrading or chanqes in existing facilities as a prerequisite for annexation. In case any future development should occur, the developer shall provide and pay for major improvements or facilities. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. The subject territory is presently zoned R-3 (High Density Residential) in the County. Prior to Land clearing for the school :site, this area was occupied by multiple family, sinqle family, institutuinal, commercial, church and open space uses. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc). The proposed prezoning or Zoninq Upon Annexation will be City R-3 (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling) zone over the majority of the area and R-3 CH (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling, Church Overlay) zone on the Southerly portion where the existing church property is located (See attached zoning plat). The proposed project will result int he elimination of seven sinqle family ho~es, tri-plex and four plex apartments and a business (A.T. &T). to be replaced by the school site. 4:ANN.336.3 -3- ORIGINAL List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of community facilities, etc. City police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than the present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol. Current City Police standard is higher sworn officer per 1,000 population percentage comt~ared to the County standard. Refuse service will be provided by the City and will result in savings to the owners within this annexation. No special assessments or charqes for street sweeping, leaf collection, school crossinq guards, street lighting energy costs and fire hydrants. VIII. A. Please provide the following information relative to city/district and county taxes: List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate in area equal 1.121153% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. When annexed a desiqnated percentage of the total tax of the area will accrue to the City. (Rate as shown on 1989-90 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List). Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: If so, explain. Yes, the tax rate for City bonds equals 0.004298% of assessed market value. When annexed, the total tax rate will be 1.125451%. (Rates as shown on 1989-90 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List) Ce HOW will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00? The yearly tax would increase by the amount of $2.15 on a house of $50,000 this market value due to inclusion of the City Bond Rate. D4:ANN.336.4 -4- ZONING UPON ANNEXATION 5006 CHESTER NO. 2 Ivt-l-D 4~H ~R~T · 5~H 5i~T Q"rY C"O~JVT~ C-2D M-1D PD PD 56TH /?-2 i__'~ - - C-2D M2 M-2 0 4.00 I I M-1 R-3-D R-3-D I' ~ 35TH STREET o C-2-D COI. JVTY · 'Cl'l"r' [ 19 T2gs, R28E '- (3, ORIGINAL P.U,D. I R-2-D 4.0TH STREET R-2 R-1 P.U.D. R-2-D STREET C-O-D C-2-D STREET M--1 M-1 CITY Of BAKERSFIELD TO R-~ & R-3-CH hJ