HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUSINESS PLAN 12/28/2000330 W. Bay Street, Suite 140 ~
Costa Mesa. Oalifornia 92627
(949| 642-0245 ~e FAX j949] 642-4474
Transmittal GEOMATRIX
Sent Via: [] Messenger [] U.S. Mail [] Overnight Mail
Date: December 28, 2000 fi~
To: David Troop From: Calvin Hardcastle
California Regional Water Quality Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Control Board 330 West Bay Street, Suite 140
3614 East Ashlan Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92627
Fresno, California 92326
Project Number: 5825
Project Name: Former Sunland Oil Refinery
Item Description
1 Second Half 2000 Remediation Progress Report
2 Semi-annual Monitoring and Status Report, Second Half 2000
Remarks
Geomatrix Consultants is. submitting the listed reports on behalf of World Oil Corp. If you have any
questions, please call Mr. John Hundley of World Oil Corp. at (562) 928-0100 or Mr. Calvin Hardcastle of
Geomatrix at (949) 642-0245.
CC:
Mr. John Hundley - World Oil Corp.
Ms. Christine Mirabel - World Oil Corp.
Mr?hilip Jay - SJVAPCD
Mr. John Mitchell - Kern County District Attorneys Office
Mr. Russell Walls - RWQCB, CV Region
Mr. Ralph Huey - City of Bakersfield, Hazardous Materials Division
Mr. Bruce Howard - Latham & Watkins
C:W[LES55825~8251ot. doc
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental Scientists
I 330 W. Bay Street, Suite 140
Costa Mesa, California 92627 ~
I (94c3) 642-0245 · FAX I949) 642-4474 GEOMATRIX
December 28, 2000
5825.001
I Mr. David Troop
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Central Valley Region
I 3614 East Ashland Avenue
Fresno, California 93726
I
Subject: Second Half 2000 Remediation Progress Report
June 1, 2000 through November 30, 2000
Former Sunland Oil Refinery, 2152 Coffee Road, Bakersfield, California
I Cleanup and Abatement Order No. 95-702
SJVAPCD Authority to Construct Permit No. S~207-42~5
I Dear Mr.
Troop:
On behalf of World Oil Corp. (World), Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. (Geomatrix) has prepared
I this the Second Half 2000 subsurface remediation results for the former Sunland'
report
to
present
Oil Refinery in Bakersfield, California. Operational data for the high-capacity vapor e/~traction
system (HCVES), air sparging (AS), and liquid-phase hydrocarbon (LPH) recovery activities
I from June 1, 2000 through 30, are attached to this report.
November
2000
This report includes a site. location map (Figure 1),'a site map depicting well locations '(Figure 2),
I a graph of cumulative pounds of hydrocarbons removed versus time (Figure 3), a summary of
operating data for the reporting period (Tables 1 through 4), and laboratory analytical reports and
i chain-of-custody records (Appendix A).
During the reporting period, remedial operations were performed in accordance with the
I requirements contained in the permit(s). Several upgrades to the system were performed during
this reporting period. Three of the four neMy installed on-site dual-nested air sparge/vapor
extraction (AS/VE) wells, GMX-AS/VE-63 through GMx-AS/VE-65, were connected to the
I. HCVES between July 26 and July 31, 2000 to enhance LPH recovery. Connection of
GMX-AS/VE-66 to the HCVES required connecting pipes to existing pipes underneath the
railroad and was completed on August 25, 2000.
I Operation of the liquid injection system continued during the reporting period. The injection
system conveys liquid, including LPH and groundwater, that collects in the HCVES knockout
Ivessel to the'flare for treatment. Approxi'mately 1,029 gallons of LPH and groundwater were
injected into the flare during the reporting period.
!
IGeornatrix Consultantsj Inc.
Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental Scientists
!
GEOMATRIX
I Mr. David Troop
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
iCentral Valley Region
December 28, 2000
Page 2
I Flexible PVC hoses ("stingers") in wells SE-AS/VE-44A, SE-AS/VE-46A, SE-VE-47A, SE-VE-
48A, SE-VE-49A, TSG-AS/VE-52A, and TSG-AS/VE-53A were used to increase the
Ihydrocarbon'concentration in the extracted soil vapor. The stingers are attached to the existing
HCVES and hydrocarbon vapors are extracted from the wells through the stingers under vacuum
applied by the vapor extraction blower.
I During the reporting period, the HCVES and air sparge system operated approximately 3,759
hours, An estimated 426,430 pounds of hydrocarbon vapor were removed, bringing the
I cumulative total of hydrocarbons removed to 1,579,941 pounds.
During the reporting period, LPH recovery pumps in wells MW-7 and SE-VE-42C removed
I 63 (estimated) gallons of LPH. Approximately 4 gallons of LPH were removed
approximately
from wells SE-AS/VE-45B, SE-VE-48C, SE-VE-49B, TSG-VE-57, GMX-AS/VE-64, and
GMS-AS/VE-65 directly using a vacuum truck. Additionally, 341 gallons of LPH were removed
I from the knockout vessel condensate. The in SE-VE-47C
as
hydrocarbon
vapor
product
stinger
removed approximately 12 gallons of LPH. The total amount of LPH removed (including hand
i bailing) since December 1996 is approximately 1,977 gallons.
We appreciate your attention to this project and if you have any questions or need any additional
i information on this report, please contact Mr. John Hundley of World Oil Corp. at
(562) 928-0100 or the undersigned at (949) 642-0245.
i Sincerely,
GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC.
Calvin H. Hardcastle, P.E.
I Senior Engineer
I
I
I '
I P:\5825.000.0k5825.001.0X2NDHALF00\Troop.doc
GEOMATRIX
I' Mr. David Troop
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
i Central Valley Region
December 28, 2000
Page 3
I Attachments: Figure 1- Site Location Map
Figure 2- Monitoring/Remediation Well and Treatment System Locations
i Figure 3- Locations of Newly Installed Remediation and Monitoring Wells
Figure 4- Cumulative Pounds of Hydrocarbon Removed versus Time
Table 1- HCVES Summary for the Reporting Period Second-Half 2000
I Table 2- Liquid-Phase Hydrocarbon (LPH) Removal for the Period Second-Half
2000
Table 3- Monthly HCVES Operation Data
I Table 4- Individual Extraction Well Concentrations
Vapor
Appendix A- Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records
!
cc: Mr. John Hundley, World Oil Corp.
Ms. Christine Mirabel, World Oil Corp.
I Philip Jay, Joaquin Valley Pollution Control District
Mr.
San
Air
Mr. John Mitchell, Kern County District Attorney's Office
i Mr. Russell W. Walls, California RWQCB - Central Valley Region
Mr. Ralph E. Huey, City of Bakersfield, Hazardous Materials Division
Mr. Bruce Howard, Latham & Watkins
I
I
I PA5825.000.OX5825.001.0~2NDHALF00\Troop.doc
FIGURES
GEOMATRiX
FIGURES
~.,. ~. ....~ ..... .. ~ ~ ~.. ~ : . .. ~, -~ ,
,-- ~ 8osemop modified ~rom U.S.G.5.7.5 minute Ouodronqlo
~OX/~INFE~ 0ildole 1954, California. Photo-revised 1968 and
Costard 1954, California. Photo-revised 1973.
~ Figure By P~j~ NO.
~ ~ SITE LOCATION ~ s8~s
~ FORMER SUN'ND OIL REFINERY
~ 2152 Coffee Road
= F~um
¢ ~ GEOMATRIX Bakemfield, Califomia ..m 1
· GMX-MW-61 EXPLANATION
.... LEASE LINE, PROPERTY BOUNDARY
- . , 6 FT. CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE
r~ GMX-MW-BO NEW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
~ WELL LOCATION
PG&E FACILITY GMX-ASNE-63 NEW AIR SPARGE/SO!L VAPOR
. STORAGE FACILITY ~ /~ ~ ~ SE-MW-27 SE-MW-51 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
~ LOCATION
~ ~ ~ SE-V~MW-29 SOIL v~OR EXTRACTION/GROUNDWATER
~ ~ ~" ,~ t~ X S,-AS/MW-,, ~R SPOOL POINT/O~OUNDWATER
' // / / ' · MONITORING WELL LOCATION
SE-MW-51 ~ O0 SE-AS~I
. A ~R SP~GE WELL LOCATION
~ X '' SE-V.A,-5, TRIPLENESTEDV~OREXTRACT/ONWE'L. LOCATION
' . ' SE-SVE-59 SOIL v~oR EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION '
~ GMX-MW-62(S/D) //// ~ ~/ ~ /1~ II11 ~ [ ~ ~' FACILITySOURCE OFpL~,M~:T~KPATRICKF~Ms~DANDHENDERSONREFiNERY, DATEDINC" S.P.C.C.
DECEMBER 13,1985. NEW
COFFEE RO~ ELEVATED BERM,
CITY OF B~ERSFIELD SEP~ATION OF GRADE DISTRICT.
~~ ~~~--~'~_JL ~' '-- ~ ~ ~ ¢ WERE SURVEYED BY AZIMUTH BOUND~Y SPECI~ISTS ON
~ -. ....... ". ......................... . - M~CH 18 ~D NOVEMBER 5, 1996.
........ ~ ........ ~~N[-~2~ ~ / 8E-AGN~ ~ ~ 5. SITE FEATURES ~D STRUCTURE LOCATIONS ~E ~PROXIMATE.
~ RE~EDIATION SYSTEM COMPOUND (WEST /~
~ / SE-V~A~37~, . ] I ' ~") ..~) ~HIGH C~ACITY SOIL V~OR EXTRACTION ........... I
I - - ~ ~ _ SE-MW-24 8/D : ~1 i ~ ~ TSG-VE-5~' REMEDIATION SYSTE~ COMPOUND (SOUTH ~wvv-~u~)~ _
i~ ~ ,
m ~
~ ~ MONITORING/REMEDIATION WELL AND
.,. TREATMENT SYSTEM LOCATIONS
;~' ~; ~~ ~ ~II FORMER SUN'ND OIL REFINERY
~ ~' 2152 COFFEE ROAD
' SE-MW-21 ' ~ Bakersfield, California
i ~
m e GMX-MW-61
EXPLANATION
......... LEASE LINE, PROPERTY BOUNDARY
m, .......... CENTER LINE
OF
COFFEE
ROAD
1'7:':! ~ ~ i~ .............. 6 FT, CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE
m
:~ ::: ? /~: '~ GMX-MW-60 NEW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
~ - :% ~ wELL LOCATION
/;.-::~'"/' ' ~ '~" %: GMX-ASNE~3 NEW ~R SPOOL/SOIL V~OR
~,' NITN~r~ ,w, ~ ~ '~ fi ~ '~%, 0 WELL LOCATION '
., ~ :~ SE-MW-51 GROUNDWATER ~ONITORING WELL
. ~:z;~: : [~:: . ' ..~ ~ :~ '% ~ LOCATION
" ~, / r. ~ ~ ~ t~ SE-VE/MW-~9 SOiL V~OR EXTRACTiON/GROUNDWATER
. z' ~ m ~,' I~ ~ ~ ¢ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
' _ ..... :.?.~ ///~/ / :,/~ ~ ~ j ~.~ %. . SE-AS/MW.-2B ~R SP~GE FOINT/GROUNDWATER
. ~:::i /~..'~"-~: '~/ f ~ ~ :~ ~%. ';~ ~ONITORING WELL LOCATION
m ..,::; ~ / , f: . : ~,~ ~ ~R SPOOL WELL LnCATnN
~': 1:' ' ~-~: ..... ¢ "" "~, ~ TRIPLE NESTED V~OR EXTRACTION WELL
~5 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION
//// i 6 / ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ,~ ~ .... ~6- ............... ,~ , % NOTES:
¢i/, ' ' ti ~ j~hu / % ~il i~ ii i~ ¢ 1. SOURCE OF M~: PATRICK ~D HENDERSON INC., S.P.C.C.
/ I t ~ : ~ ~i , ~ n , ~ ~ .... , : ¢"-' ~ ~ f FACILITY PL~,T~K F~MS ~D REFINERY, DATED
. t,;¢ ~ ,~' ¢/ ~ {~l'i~ } ~i iH / ~ ;~'J / ~ 5i~ ~
. ~/¢L__ ..~ ~- r i iii; l~ ~ r *i {~ ~ } i;~ ¢ ~ ;,; ~. / ~ 5, DECEMBER 13,1985. NEW COFFEE RO~ ELEVATED BERM,
I , · ~[l/ '% ~ L~A~ ~ G~-MW~O ~ j ~! ] ~ / l~ ~ ~ , n~ ~ ] ;~ .... ~ ~,! FORMER COFFEE ROAD, ~O PG~E SiTE INFORMATION FROM
[ ~ [ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~, ~' ~ '~ ,I ," · : CITY OF B~ERSFIELD SEP~ATION OF GRADE DISTRICT.
...... ( x'-.- ................. ~ ....................... " . ~ ....... ~¢~. ~,. .. ~.~=~ ~L=~ ~-:~ ~ ~ 2. MONITORINO WELL LOCATIONS ~0 SITE BOUNDARY LINES
;'*. ]"%;~,~".:~::.:"'7'% ~---%LT.Z]%%Z~L' i ~ ":~=~%~&~'<~ ~~:~~:~:;~L~=:.: ~ ~ WERE SURVEYED BY AZIMUTH BOUND~Y SPECI~ISTS 0N
- -~ ' ~ V ' / ' -= ..~¢u-,~--< .......... ~ .'--- =-6~ ¢-~"- 3. SITE FEATURES ~D SmUCrUmg LOCMIO~S ~g ~PROXI~ATE.
I
m
i ~{~ ], ~ ~. ~"' ~: ~ "
' ,.L.-~ 7-'-~i ii , ~ i ) ' o l~ 300
~ ~ .:1 ~ { ' i B~semop modified from figure
'"" ~: } ~ : i provided by The S ..... Group
''.',, '% if~:~ ~ ~ ; LOCATIONS OF NEWLY INSTALLED
,; ; ¥ ¥ :' ? il REMEDIATION AND
~ "::::,, ~'., ' ~ ; MONITORING WELLS
~ FORMER SUN.ND OIL REFINERY
~ ~-'¢, " i 2152 COFFEE ROAD
" : .................................... ....... '~ Figure By Project No.
' ............................... m~ S5825
GEOMATRIX 1~13/00 69
1,800,000 -
Notes:
1. SVES started on 3~22~96.
2. SVES upgraded to High-capacity extraction system 9/16/98 (startup).
1
j 3. Temporary (10122198-118199) HCVES shutdown, pending system modifications.
i 4. Temporary (1125199-3131199) shutdown during STF demolition, jr
5. TSG Inc., began operating the HCVES. /
1,400,000 6. HCVES shutdown due to system upgrade/installation activities.
7. HCVES shutdown due to system upgrade/installation activities.
-
1,200,000
1,000,000
oo,ooo
600,000
400,000 ~=~=~~~5
200,000
0 ,
(D (D I',- ~'~ I~- t'~ I'~ I'~ O0 ~30 CO ~O ~O (30 (33 (33 (33 (33 O3 O~ O O O O O O
DATE
CUMULATIVE POUNDS OF HYDROCARBONS REMOVED VERSUS TIME Figure by Project No.
sc 5825.001
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY
GEOMATRIX 2152 Coffee Road Date Figure No.
Bakersfield, California 12111/00 4
p:L5825.000.0L5825.001.0\2 ndhal f00\TablesXFigure4
TABLES
GEOMATi:II×
TABLES
TABLE 1 ~
GEOMATRIX
HCVES SUMMARY FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD
.It/NE 2{)00 THROUGI-I NOVEMBER 201)1}
FOR3'IER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Client Contact: Mr. John Hundley
Consultant: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Lead Agency: RWQCB, Central Valle. y Region
Reporting Pe?)d: June 1, 2000 - November 30, 2000
HCVES Treatment Device: John Zink Flare
SJVAPCD Permit !o Operate No.: ~ S-207-42-5 ...
Equipment In.ventory: STF WTF
(1 ) John Zink Flare (1) 125 psi, 27 cl?m Air Compressor
(2) Sutorbilt Legend Blowers with 50 hp
motors (2) CEE Genie Pumps/Product skimmers
(2) 250-gallon Knockout (K/O) Vessels, (1) 500-gallon above ground storage tank
Transfer Pumps, and Piping
(1) 500-gallon above ground storage tank
(1) 125 psi, 100 scfin Air Compressor
HCVES PROCESS SUMMARY ,,,
STF WTF
Process Concentrations at System Start Up: 10/7/96 3/22/96
Laboratory reported TPHg concentration: 7, tOO 31,090 ppmv
Laboratory reported benzene concentration: 94 130 ppmv
MW-4, SE-AS/VE-44B, SE-AS/VE-45B,
SE-AS/VE-46A, SE-AS/VE-46B,
SE-VE-47A, SE-VE-47B, SE-VE-47C,
SE-VE-48A, SE-VE-48B, SE-VE-49A, SE-MW-9(R), SE-VE-40A, SE-VE-40B,
Venting Sources This Period: SE-VE-49B, TSG-AS/VE-54A, SE-VE-42A, and SE-VE-43B
TSG-AS/VE-55A, TSG-VE-57,
GMX-AS/VE-63, OMX-AS/VE-64,
GMX-AS/VE-65, and GMX-;~S/VE-66
Process/Influent Concentrations:
Field observed TPHg concentration: 6/28/00, 6,2201 6/28/00, 1,520 ppmv
7/31/00, 6,000~ 7/31/00, 1,420 ppmv
8/24/00, > 10,000~ 8/24/00, 2,240 ppmv
Laboratory reported TPHg concentration: 6/28/00, 8,600~ 6/28/00, 1,200 ppmv
7/31/00, 14,000~ 7/31/00, 2,500 ppmv
8/24/00, 10,000t 8/24/00, 2,500 ppmv
Average Flow Rate this Period: 573 152 scfm
Average Manifold Vac. uum this Period: 6.4 0.9 in. H~
Cumulative TPHg Destroyed this Period: 406,8 i6 19,612 >ounds
Cumulative TPHg Destroyed this Period (WTF and STF): 426,428 >ounds
Cumulative TPHt~ Destroyed since Start Up (3/22/96)2: 1,579,941 ~ounds
Utility Usage this Period:
Electricity: 326,875 kWh
Natural Gas: 171,519 Therms
Operating Time for this Period 3,7593 I 3,7593 hours
Number of Auto Shut Downs During this Period: 7[ 7
AS PROCESS SUMMARY STF
System Started: 12/30/96
Air Sparge Wells this period: SE-AS-30, SE-AS-31, SE-AS/VE-46
Average air sparge flow rate per well: , I0 scfm
AS PROCESS SUMMARY WTF
System Started: 5/23/97 Air sparge wells did not operate this period.
Air Sparge Wells this period:
Average air sparge flow rate per well:
WTF = Former West Tank Farm
STF = Former South Tank Farm
l. WTF manifold tied into STF manifold. TPHg yalue reflects influences from the WTF wells.
2. Includes operational data from two Paragon thermal oxidizers prior to HCVES operations.
3. The system was shut down from 7/26/00 to 7/31/00 for construction of new piping for OMX-AS/VE-63 through GMX-AS/VE-66.
I, TABLE 2 ~
GEOMATRIX
LIQUID-PHASE HYDROCARBON (LPH) REMOVAL FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD
I JUNE 2000 THROUGH NOVEMBER 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Client Contact: Mr. John Hundley
Consultant: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Lead Agency: RWQCB, Central Valley Region
Reporting Period: June 1, 2000 - November 30, 2000
Equipment Inventory: Two CEE Genie Pumps/Product skinuners, air compressor,
500-gallon steel double contained tank, three product stinger assemblies
1. Product skimmers/pumps.
Treatment Method: 2. Stingers connected into existing vapor extraction system.
Remediation Start Date:
Hand Bailing 12/27/96
Pumping 9/18/97
Product Stinger Assemblies 6/9/99
MW-7, SE-VE-42C, SE-VE-47C, SE-AS/VE-45B, SE-VE-48C,
IExtraction Sources this period: SE-VE-49B, TSG-VE-57, GMX-AS/VEr64, GMX-AS/VE-65
Monitoring Frequency: ' Weekly
Fotal Site Visits Completed this Period: 28
Well Source MW-7:
Product Pump Installed (9/18/97): CEE, Genie SOS2 Product Skimmer/Pump
LPH Removed by Pump: 42 gallons
Well Source SE-VE-42C:
Product Pump Installed (9/18/97): CEE, Genie SOS2 Product Skimmer/Pump
LPH Removed by Pump: 21 gallons
Well Source SE-VE-47C:
Product Stinger Installed (6/9/99): Flexible PVC Product Stinger
LPH Removed by Stinger: 12 gallons
Well Sources SE-AS/VE-45B, SE-VE-48C, SE-VE-49B,
TSG-VE-57, GMX-AS/VE-64, GMX-AS/VE-65
LPH Removed by Vacuum Truck: 4 gallons
LPH Remov6d with Product Skimmers/Pumps This Period: 63 gallons
LPH Removed with PVC Stingers This Period: 12 gallons
LPH Removed with Vacuum Track This Period: 4 gallons
LPH Removed as Vapor Condensate: 341 gallons
total LPH Removed This Period~: 420 gallons
Cumulative LPH Removed Since Start (12/96): 1,977 gallons
Fluid Injected into Flare this Period2: 1,029 gallons
Water Removed this Period3: 5,625 gallons
Recycled Liquid from site this: Period: 5,629 gallons
Recycling Facility: DeMenno Kerdoon, Compton, CA
1. Totalvolume ofLPH removed includes approximhtely 341 gallons ofhydrocarbon vapor condensate collected ln the knockout vessel ofwhich approximately
il 91 gallons injected/nto ~he tlare,
was
2. Total volume of fluid injected into the flare includes approximately 91 gallons of hydrocarbon vapgr condensate collected in the knockout vessel.
3. Total volume of water includes approximately 3,125 gallons of purge water fi.om the quarterly groundwater sampling event in September 2000.
I
I
l , P:\5825.000.0\5825,001.0X2ndhal f00\Tables~LPH
TABLE 3a GEOMATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND AIR SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA
JUNE 2000
Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System I HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration~ Process Flow Manifold Vacuum Temperature Removedb TPHg Removed Status Operating Time
(ppmv) (scfm) (in. Hg) (~F) (lb) (lb) (on/off) (hr)
STF ] WTF STF [ WTF STF+WTF I STF WTF STF+WTF I STF 1 WTF [ STF [ WTF STF+WTF STF I WTF I STF+WTF STF I WTF STF [ WTF
6/1/00 c c 5.600 6.652 2,700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 1,111 1,895 150 1,155,559 off off I 24 24
6/2/00 c c 5,600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 I.lll 1.895 150 1,157,603 off offl~ ~ 24 24
61'3/00 ¢ c 5.600 6,652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 1, I I 1 1.895 150 I, 159,648 off off 24 24
6/4/00 c ¢ 5.600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 I. 111 1.895 150 I. 161.692 off off 24 24
6/5/00 ¢ c 5,600 6,652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 1,11 I 1.895 150 1.I 63,737 off off 24 24
6/6/00 c ¢ 5.600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1 7 1.111 1.895 150 I, 165,78 [ off off 24 24
6/7/00 c ¢ 5.600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 1. I I 1 1,895 150 1.167.826 off off 24 24
6/8/00 C c 5.600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1.7 1. l 11 1.200 95 1, t 69.121 off off 15.2 15.2
6/9/00 d d 0 0 l. 169.121 oft' off 0 0
6/10/00 d d 0 0 1,169,121 off off 0 0
6/1 Il00 d d 0 0 I. 169.121 off off 0 0
6/12/00 ¢ c 5,600 6.652 2.700 695 510 185 7.5 1 7 I. 111 1.066 84 I. 170.271 off off t 3.5 13.5
6/13/00 Technician Technician e f 4,710 5,122 2,700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 l,tll 1,717 101 1.172.090 off off 24 24
6~14/00 c c 4,710 5~122 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 I,Ill 1,717 101 1.173,908 off off 24 24
6/I 5/00c ¢ 4.710 5,[22 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1,11 l 1.717 101 I,175.727 off off 24 24
6/16/00 c c 4.7t0 5.122 · 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 08 I.lll 1.717 101 1,177,545 off off 24 24
6~17/00 c c 4.710 5.122 2,700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1.111 L717 101 1.179.364 off off 24 24
6/18100 c c 4,710 5.122 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 I,lll 1,717 101 1.181,183 off off 24 24
6/19/00 c c 4.710 5.122 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1.111 1,717 IOI 1.183,001 off off 24 24
6/20/00 ¢ c 4.710 5.[22 2.700 735 610 125 45 0.8 I.lli 1,717 101 1.184,820 off off 24 24
6/2 1/00c ¢ 4.710 5.122 2.700 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1,1 I I 1,717 101 1.186,639 off off 24 24
6/22/00 Technician Technician e f 4,900 5.535 1.800 735 610 125 45 0.8 1,019 1,824 67 1.188,531 off off 24 24
6/23/00 c c 4.900 5.535 1.800 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1.019 1,824 67 1,190,422 off off 24 24
6/24/00 ¢ ¢ 4,900 5.535 1,800 735 610 125 4.5 08 1,019 6i 2 1,190,486 off off 0.8 0.8
6/25/00 d d 0 0 l. 190.486 off off 0 0
6/26/00 d d 0 0 l, 190,486 off off 0 0
6/27/00 ¢ c 4.900 5,535 1.800 735 610 125 4.5 0.8 1,019 1.064 39 1,191,589 off off 14 14
6/28/00 Technician Technician e. ~ f. ~ 6.220 / 8,600 7.292 1.520 / 1.200700 570 130 7.5 0.9 1.024 2,228 59 1,193,876 off off 24 24
6/29100 e c 6.220 7,292 1,520 700 570 130 7.5 0.9 1.024 2,228 59 1,196.164 off off 24 24
6/30/00 c c 6.220 7.292 1,520 700 570 130 7.5 0.9 1,024 2,228 59 1.198.451 off off 24 24
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF and WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 44,937
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF During the Reporting Period (lb) 42,444
Cumulative TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 2,494
STF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 548
WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 548
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,198,451
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 21,915
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 28,200
WTF Electrical Utility U~age for the reporting period (kWh) 0
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 76
WTF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 76
a. Field concentrations include hydrocarbon range ~om C I to C 12. cL System shut down due ua pilot failure due to high winds.
b. Hydrocarbon removal for this month is calculated using the laborauaq, analytical results for the samples e. STF process flow = combined flow - W'FF process flow. STF process concentration calculated using
coflected on 3une 28, 2000 and adjusted for lh~ process concentrations measured, individual and combined flowrates, and WTF and combined process concentrations.
Fr~'~tppm )qFl00:bq Flr. ol~ ] [ ...... (f~ '¥] [-60rma '] t ....... 1 f. WTF manifold fied in to STF manifold. WTFmanifoldval ...... kedopen.
C 1,000,000 JLrnole.J C379fi~J L . I, nm JJk hr j ' ' g. Collected vapor samples. 6,220 / 8,600 corresponds to Fiald/ Laboratoq, analyticalresults.
TABLE3b
GEOMATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND AIR SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2000
' Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration' Process Flow Manifold Vacuum Temperature Removedb TPHg Removed Status Operating Time
(ppmv) (scfm) (in. Hg)
(°F) (lb) (lb) ' (on/off) (hr)
STF I WTF sw I wrF STF+WTF I STF I WTF STF+WTFI STF I WTF STF I WW STF+WTF STF I WTF I STF+WTF STF I WTF STF I ~V~rF
7/1/00 c c 6,220 7,292 1.520 700 570 130 7.5 0.9 1,024 3,728 132 1,202,311 off off 24 34
712/00
c c 6,220 7.292 1,520 700 570 130 7.5 0.9 1,024 621 22 1,202.954 off off 4 4
7/3/00 Technician Technician d e 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1.068 1,357 60 1,204.371 off off I I I I
7/4/00 c ¢ 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 125 7 5 0.9 1.068 2.960 131 1,207,461 off off 24 24
7/5/00 e c 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 t 25 7.5 0.9 1,068 2.960 131 1.210,552 off off 24 24 '
7/6/00 c c 4.980 5,723 1.564 700 575 125 7 5 0.9 1,068 2.960 131 1,213,642 off off' 24 24
7/7/00 c c 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1.068 2.960 131 1,216.733 off off 24 24
7/8/00 c c 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1,068 2.960 t31 1.219,823 off off 24 24
7/9/00 c ¢ 4,980 5.723 1.564 700 575 125 7. 5 0.9 1.068 2.960 131 1,222,914 off off 24 24
7/10/00 c c 4.980 5.723 1.564 700 575 . 125 7.5 0.9 1.068 2,960 131 1,226,004 off off 24 24
7/11/00 TedmicianTechnician d e 4,920 5.642 1.600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2.919 134 1.229.058 off off 24 24
7/12/00 c c 4.920 5,642 1,600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 1,095 50 1,230,202 off off 9 9
,, 7/13/00
c c 4.920 5.642 1.600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 1,946 89 1.232.238 off off 16 16
7/14/00 c c 4.920 5.642 1,600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2,919 134 1.235.291 off off 24 24
7/15/00 c c 4.920 5.642 1.600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2,919 134 1,238,344 off off' 24 24
7/16/00 c c 4.920 5.642 1.600 700 575 125 7 5 0.9 998 2.9I 9 134 1,241,398 off off' 24 24
7/17/00 ¢ c 4.920 5.642 1,600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2,919 134 1.244.451 off off 24 24
7/I 8/00 c c 4.920 5,642 1.600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2,919 134 1.247,504 off off 2'4 24
7/19/00 c c 4.920 5.642 1.600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2.919 134 1.250.558 off off 24 24
7/20/00 c c 4.920 5.642 1,600 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 998 2,919 134 1.253,611 off off 24 24
7~ 1/00 Technician Technician d e 4.480 5.132 1.480 700 575 125 7.5 09 1.080 2.656 124 1,256,391 off off ~4 24
7/22/00 c ¢ 4.480 5,132 1.480 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1.080 2.656 124 1.259.171 off` off 24 24
7/23/00 ¢ c 4.480 5.132 1,480 700 575 i 25 7 5 0.9 1,080 2.656 124 1,261.951 Off off 24 24
7/24/00 c c 4,480 5.132 I AgO 700 575 125 7. 5 0.9 1.080 2.656 124 1.264.732 off off 24 24
7/25/00 ¢ c 4.480 5.132 1.480 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1.080 2.656 124 1,267,512 off off 24 24
7/26/00 c c 4.480 5.132 1.480 700 575 125 7.5 0.9 1.080 775 36 1,268.323 off off 7 7
7/27/00 f f 0 0 1.268,323 off off 0 0
7/28/00 f f 0 0 1,268.323 off Off 0 0
7/29/00 f f 0 0 1,268.323 off off 0 0
7/30/00 f f 0 0 1.268,323 off off 0 0
7/3 1/00 Technician Technician d. ,~ e, ,~ 6.000/14.000 6.721 1,420/2,500 735 635 100 6.25 0.7 99t 2.464 61 1.270,848 off off 155 15.5
Cumulative TPHg Removed Prom STF and WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 72,397
~umulative TPHg Removed From STF During the Reporting Period (lb) 69,341
Eumulafive TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 3,055
gTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 567
'WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 567
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,270,848
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 27,977
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 36,900
WTF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 516
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 91
WTF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 91
~- Field concentranO~S inalude hydrocarbon range fromCl toC12, d. STF process flow = combined flow - W'I'F process flow. STF process concen~afion calculated using
b. Hydrocarbon removal for this month is calculated using the laboratory analytcal results for the samples individual and combined flowrates, and WTF and combined process concentrations.
collected on July 31, 2000 and adjusted for the process concentrations mezsured, e. WTF manifold tied in to STF manifold. WTF manifold valve cracked open.
FTPHg(ppmv)~ ]'lO0/b~ ]- lmole ~ [~. _ (ft~ ~'] ]'60rr~ '[ · , f. System shut down to facilitat .... cfionofnewpiping fo ...... lis.
~.~ .....ed L 1,000,00°JLm°'~JL379~ JLL. JJ%hr J g. Collected vapor samples. 6,000/14.000 .... pondstoFieid/Laboratoryanalytcalresuhn.
= ~ X -- x ~ x PLOW -- -- x[TIME(hr)]
Molecular weight of gasoli~e is estimated at lOO Ib/mole. l mole = 379 ft~. STF=SouthTankFarm
c. Data assumed from previous monitoring event. WTF = West Tank Farm
TABLE 3c ~
GEOI~ATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND AIR SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 2000
Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration' Process Flow Manifold Vacuum
Temperature Removedb TPHg Removed! Status Operating Time
(ppmv) (scfm) (in. Hg) (°F) (lb) (lb) (on/off) (br)
STF L_ww STF I WTF STF+WTF I STF I WTF STF+XvrFt STF I WTF STF I WTF I STF+WTF SW I WTF STF+WTF STF I WTF STF I WTF
8/1/00 ~ c c 6,000 6,721 1.420 735 635 100 6.25 0.7 991 1,615 60 1,272,524 off off 24 24
8/2/00 c c 6,000 6,721 1,420 735 635 '100 6.25 0.7 991 1,615 60 1,274,199 off off 24 24
8/3/00 c c 6,000 6,721 1.420 735 635 100 6.25 0.7 991 1,615 60 1,275,875 off off 24 24
8/4/00 c c 6.000 6.721 1.420 735 635 100 6.25 0. 7 991 1.615 60 1,277, 550 off off 24 24
8/5/00 c c 6.000 6.721 1,420 735 635 100 6.25 07 991 1,615 60 1,279,226 off off 24 24
8/6/00 ¢ c 6,000 6,721 1.420 735 635 ] 00 6.25 0.7 99 l 1,615 60 1,280,901 off off 24 24
8/7/00 T*chnJcian Technician d e 5.000 5,602 1,180 735 635 100 6 0.7 1,118 1,346 50 1,282,298 off off 24 24
8/8/00 c c 5.000 5.602 1.120 735 635 100 6 0.7 1,118 1,346 50 1,283,694 off off 24 24
8/9/00 c c 5,000 5,602 I. 180 735 635 100 6 0.7 I, 118 1,346 50 1,285,090 off off 24 24
8/10/00 c c 5.000 5.602 1.180 735 635 100 6 0.7 1,118 1,346 50 1,286,487 off off 24 24
8/11/00 c c 5.000 5.602 l, 180 735 635 100 6 0.7 1, I 18 1,346 50 1,287,883 off off 24 24
8/12/00 c c 5,000 5,602 1,180 735 635 100 6 0.7 [,118 1,346 50 1,289,279 off off 24 24
8/I 3/00c c 5.000 5,602 1. 180 735 635 100 6 0.7 L I 18 1,346 50 1,290,676 off off 24 24
8/14/00 c c 5,000 5.602 I, 180 735 635 100 6 0.7 I, I 18 1,346 50 1,292,072 off off :24 24
8/15/00 c c 5,000 5.602 1.180 735 635 100 6 0. 7 I, 118 1,346 50 1,293.468 off off 24 24
8/16/00 c c f 5.000 5,602 LIS0 735 635 100 6 0.7 1,118 1,346 50 1,294,864 8 off 24 24
8/17/00 c c 5.000 5~602 1,180 735 635 100 6 0.7 1,118 1,346 50 1,296,261 24 off 24 24
8/18/00 T~hnicianTechnician d e 4,300 4,754 1,420 735 635 100 5.7 0.75 1,095 1,141 60 1,297,462 24 off 24 24
8/19/00 e c 4,300 4,754 1.420 735 635 100 5.7 0.75 1,095 1,141 60 1,298,662 24 off 24 24
8/20/00 c c 4,300 4.754 1,420 735 635 100 5.7 075 L095 1,141 60 1,299,863 24 off 24 24
8/21/00 c c 4,300 4,754 1.420 735 635 100 5.7 0.75 1,095 1,141 60 1,301,064 24 off 24 24
8/22/00 c c 4.300 4,754 1.420 735 635 100 5.7 0.75 1,095 1,141 60 L302,265 24 off 24 24
8/23/00 c c 4.300 4.754 1,420 735 635 100 5.7 0.75 1,095 1.141 60 1,303,466 24 off 24 .24
8/24/00 Technician Technician d, ~ e, ~ > 10,000/10,00011,222 2,240/2,500 735 635 100 6.1 0.75 1,097 2,698 95 1,306;258 24 off 24 24
8/25/00 c ¢ > I 0,000 11.223 2.240 735 635 100 6.1 0.75 ! ,097 2.698 95 1,309,051 24 off 24 24
8/26/00 c c > I 0,001 1 1.2242,240 735 635 100 6.1 0.75 1,097 2,698 95 1,311.844 24 off 25 24
8/27/00 c c >10.002 ] 1,2252,240 735 635 100 6. I 0.75 1,097 2,698 95 1,314,636 24 off 24 24
8/2 8/00c c >10,003 11.226 2.240 735 635 100 6.1 0.75 1.097 2,698 95 1,317.429 24 off 24 24
8/29/00 c c >10,004 11,227 2,240 735 635 100 6.1 0.75 1,097 2~698 95 1,320,221 24 off 24 24
8/30/00 Technician Technician d. h e, h 10,000 11.276 1.900 735 635 100 6 0.75 1,091 2,350 70 1.322,642 20.2 off 20.2 20~8
8/31/00 c c 10.000 11.276 1.900 735 635 100 6 0.8 1,091 2.712 81 1.325.434 24 off 24 24
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF and WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 54,586
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF During the Reporting Period (lb) 52,593
Cumulative TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 1,993
STF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 741
WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 741
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,325,434
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 33,923
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 58,200
WTF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 2,965
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 100
WTF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 100
iL FieId concentrations include hydrocarbon range from C I to C 12. d. STF process flow = combined flow - ~ process flow. STF process concentration calculated using '
b. Hydrocarbon removal for this month is calculated using the iaboratory analytical resulta for the samples individual and combined flowrates, and WTF and combined process concentrations.
:
collected on August 24, 2000 and adjusted for the process concentrations measured, e. WTF manifold bed in to STF manifold. WTF manifold valve open 10 to 20 percent
FTPHg(ppmv)] [100/b'] [ lmole ] F .... ( ft3 ~ ['60mini r · f. StartedairsparginginSE-AS-30andSE-AS-31.
TPHg removed = / -- -IXl--~x~--~x~rt.c/~/~--llxl--[x[TlME(hr)l
[_ 1,000,000 J [moleJ C379ft3j [ [,m~)J [ hr J ' g. Collest~d vapor samples. >10,000/10,000 .... ponds to Field/ Laborato~y analytical resulta.
h. The system was shut down briefly for product and water level measurements.
Molecular weight &gasoline is estimated at 100 lb/mole. I mole = 379fi ~.
c. Data assumed from previous monitoring event. STF ~ South Tank Farm
WTF = West Tank Farm
TABLE 3d GEOMATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND AIR SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 2000
Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration~ Process Flow Manifold Vacuum
Temperature Removed~' TPHg Removed Status Operating Time
(ppmv) (scfm) (in, Hg) (°F) (lb) (lb) (on/off) (hr)
9/1/00 c c 10,000 I 1,276 1,900 735 635 100 6 0.8 1.09t 4,455 83 1,329,972 24 off 24 24
9/2/00 c ¢ 10,000 I 1,276 1,900 735 635 100 6 0.8 1,091 4~455 83 1,334,510 24 off 24 24
9/3/00 ¢ c I 0,000 11,276 ~,900 735 635 loo 6 0.8 1,091 4,455 83 1,339,048 24 off 24 24
9/4/00 c c lo.000 11,276 L900 735 635 I00 6 0.8 1,091 4,455 83 1,343,586 24 off ·24' 24
9/5/00 c c 10,000 11,276 1,900 735 635 100 6 0.8 1,091 4,455 83 1,348,124 24 off 24 24
9/6/00 c c lO.000 ll,276 1,900 735 635 100 6 0.8 1,091 4,455 83 1,352,662 24 off ;- 24 24
9/7/00 Technician Technician d e 8,960 13,178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,I46 3,702 198 1,356,562 24 off 24 24
9/8/00 ¢ c 8,960 13,178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,146 3,702 198 1,360,462 24 off 24 - 24
9/9/00 e c 8,960 13.178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 I, 146 3,702 198 1,364,362 24 off 24 24
9/10/00
c c 8,960 13,178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,146 3,702 198 1,368,262 24 off 24 24
9/11/00 c c 8,960 13,178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,146 3,702 198 1,372,162 24 off 24 24
9/I~00
e c 8~960 13,178 1,740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,146 3,702 198 1,376,062 24 off 24 24
9/13/00 ¢ c 8,960 13.178 i .740 705 445 260 7.4 0.5 1,146 3,702 i 98 1,379,963 24 off 24 24
9/14/00 Tectmician Technician d, f e, f 8,000/13,000 11,763 1.560/1,800 705 445 260 7.5 ]. 1 1.108 3.304 178 1,383,445 24 off 24 24
9/15/00 c c 8.000 I 1.763 1,560 705 445 260 7.5 1.1 1.108 3,304 178 1,386,927 24 off 24 24
9/16/00 c c 8.000 I 1.763 1.560 705 445 260 7.5 l I · 1.108 3.304 178 1.390,409 24 off 24 24
9/17/00 ¢ c 8.000 I 1.763 1,560 705 445 260 7,5 1.1 1,108 3,304 178 1,393,891 24 off 24 24
9/18/00 ¢ c 8.000 I 1,763 [.560 705 445 260 7.5 1. I I. 108 3.304 178 t.397,374 24 off 24 24
9/I 9/00c c 8.000 I 1.763 [ ,560 705 445 260 7.5 I. 1 1,108 3,304 178 1.400.856 24 off 24 24
9/20/00 c c 8,000 I [.763 1.560 705 445 260 7.5 1.1 1.108 3,304 178 1.404,338 24 off' 24 24
9/2 1/00c c 8.000 11.763 1.560 705 445 260 7.5 I. 1 l,108 3,304 178 1,407,820 24 off 24 24
9/22/00 Technician Technician d e 7,920 11,513 1,580 705 450 255 7.5 I I,I10 3,271 177 1,411,268 24 off 24 24
9/23/00 c c 7,920 I 1.513 1,580 705 450 255 7.5 I 1,1 l 0 3,271 177 1,414,715 24 off 24 24
9/24/00 c c 7,920 11,513 1,580 705 450 255 7.5 I 1,110 3,271 177 1,418,162 24 off 24 24
9/25/00 c c 7,920 11.513 [ ,580 705 450 255 7.5 I 1, l I 0 3.271 177 1,421,610 24 off 24 24
9/26/00 c c 7,920 11,513 1,580 705 450 255 7. 5 1 1,110 3,271 177 1,425,057 24 off 24 24
9/27/00 c c 7,920 l 1.513 1,580 705 450 255 7.5 I l.110 3,271 t 77 1,428,505 24 off 24 24
9/28100 Technician Technician d e 6.610 7,295 1,700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1,081 2,933 67 1,431,504 24 off 24 24
9/29/00 c c 6.610 7,295 1.700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1,081 2.933 67 1,434,504 24 off 24 24
9/30/00 c c 6.610 7,295 1,700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1,081 2~933 67 1.437,503 24 off 24 24
]Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF and WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 112,069
lCumulative TPHg During the Reporting Period (lb) 107,498
Removed
From
STF
Cumulative TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 4,572
STF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 720
WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 720
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,437,503
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 32,150
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 70,200
WTF Electrical Utility. Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 3,943
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 100
WTF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) ' 100
a. Field concentrations include hydrocarbon range from C l to C 12. d. STF process flow = combined flow - WTF process flow. S'FF process concentration calculated using
b. Hydrocaxbon removaJ for this month is calculated using the laboratory analytical results for the s~mples indi~4dual and combined flowrates, and WTF and combined process concentrations.
collected on September 14, 2000 and adjusted for the process concentrations measured, e. WIT manifold fled in to STF manifold WTF mainfold valve cracked open.
TPHg ...... d L 1,000,000 J LmoleJL3?9.fi'j LLm~JJk hr J ' ' STF = South Tank Farm
Molecular weight of gasoline is estimated at 100 lb/mole. I mole = 379.ft~. WTF = West Tank Farm
c. Data ~sumed from previous monitoring event.
TABLE 3e ~
GEOMATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND A~R SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNL, kND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 20OO
' Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration= Process Flow Manifold Vacuum Temperature Removedb TPHg Removed Status Operating Time
(ppmv) (scfm) (in. Hg) (~F) (lb) (!b) (on/off) (hr)
STF [ WTF STF I WTF STF+WTF I STF [ WTF STF+WTF I STFIww STF [ WTF STF+WTF STF [ WTF STF+WTF STF [ WTF STF [ WTF
10/1/00 c c 6.610 7,295 1.700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1.081 2,722 82 1,440,307 24 off 24 24
10/2_/00c c 6.610 7.295 1,700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1,081 2,722 82 1,443,111 24 off 24 24
10/3/00 c ¢ 6,610 7,295 1.700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1.081 2,722 82 1,445,915 24 off 24 24
10/4/00 c c 6.610 7,295 1.700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1.081 2,722 82 1,448,719 24 o ft' .24 24
10/5/00 ¢ c 6.610 7.295 1~700 735 645 90 6 0.3 1,081 2,722 82 1,451,523 24 off 24 24
10/6/00 c e 6,610 7,295 1,700 735 645 90 6 03 1.081 2,722 82 1,454,327 24 off 24 24
10/7/00 Technician Technician d e 6.800 8,306 1,670 705 545 160 6.5 0.4 1.083 2.623 144 1,457,093 24 off 24 24
10/8/00 c c 6.800 8.306 1.670 705 545 160 6.5 0.4 1,083 2,623 144 1.459,860 24 off 24 24
I0/9/00 c c 6.800 8,306 1.670 705 545 160 6 5 0.4 1.083 2,623 144 1.462,627 24 off 24 24
10/I 0/00 c c 6.800 8.306 1.670 705 545 160 6.5 0.4 1.083 I, 421 78 I, 464.126 13 off 13 13
I0/I 1/00 f f 0 0 1,464.126 0 off 0 0
10/12/00¢ c 6.800 8,306 1.670 705 545 160 6.5 0.4 1.083 820 45 1,464,990 75 off 75 7.5
10/13/00Technician Technician d e 7.700 12.659 1.720 750 410 340 6.1 0.2 988 3,019 314 1.468,323 24 off 24 24
10/14/00¢ c 7.700 12,659 1,720 750 410 340 6.1 0,2 988 3.019 314 1.471,656 24 off 24 24
10/15/00c c 7,700 12.659 1,720 750 410 340 6.1 0,2 988 3,019 314 1.474,989 24 off 24 24
10/16/00c c 7.700 12.659 1.720 750 410 340 6.1 0.2 988 3,019 314 1,478,322 24 off 24 24
10/17/00Technician Technician d,~ e,~ 7.900/12,000 12.593 1,980/2.800 735 410 325 6 0.2 1.069 3.005 346 1.481,673 24 off 24 24
10/18/00c c 7.900 12~593 1.980 735 410 325 6 02 1.069 3.005 346 1.485.024 24 off 24 24
10/t 9/00 c c 7.900 12.593 1.980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1.069 3,005 346 1.488.375 24 off 24 24
10/20/00c c 7.900 12,593 1.980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1.069 3,005 346 t .491,727 24 off 24 24
10/21/00c c 7.900 12.593 1.980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1,069 1,753 202 1.493,681 14 off 14 14
10/22/00 f f 0 0 1.493.681 0 off 0 0
10/23/00 f f 0 0 1.493.681 0 off 0 0
10/24/00c c 7.900 12.593 t.980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1.069 1,503 173 1.495.357 12 off 12 12
10/25/00c c 7.900 12.593 1.980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1.069 3,005 346 1.498.708 24 off 24 24
10/26/00c c 7.900 12,593 1,980 735 410 325 6 0.2 1,069 3,005 346 1,502,059 24 off 24 24
10127/00Technician Technician d e 7,000 7,727 Ir790 735 645 90 5.7 0.56 1.076 2,883 87 1,505.029 24 off 24 24
10/28/00c c 7.000 7.727 I_790 735 645 90 5.7 056 1.076 2.883 87 1,507.998 24 off 24 24
10~9/00 c c 7.000 7.727 1.790 7~5 645 90 5.7 0.56 1.076 2,883 87 1,510.967 24 off 24 24
10/30/00c c 7.000 7~727 1.790 735 645 ' 90 5.7 0.56 1.076 2.883 87 1.513,937 24 off 24 24
10/31/00 ~c c 7.000 7,727 L790 735 645 90 5.7 0.56 1.076 120 4 1.514.060 I off I I
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF and WTF During the Reporting Period (lb): 76,557
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF During the Reporting Period (lb) 71,455
Cumulative TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) 5,102
STF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 600
WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 600
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,514,060
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 27,035
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 56,400
WTF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 1,651
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period ( Vo) 81
WTF Percent Up-Time Ddring the Reporting Period (%) 81
s_ Field concentrations include hydrocarbon range from C l to C12. d. STF process flow = combined flow - WTF process flow. S'IF process concentration calculated using
b. Hydrocarbon removal for this month is calculated using the labdratory analytical resulm for the samples indisSdual and combined flowrates, and WTF and combined process concentrations.
collected on October 17, 2000 and adjusted for the process concentrations measured, e WTF manifold tied in to STF manifold. W'I'F manifold valve ope~ l0 to 20 percent.
fr?Hg(ppmv)'} I-lO0/bqFlmole ] F (jrt' '~'] [60mini f , £ Systcmshutd°wnduet°pil°tfailureduemhighwinds' .
TPHg removed = x -- x ~ x FLOW -- x -- x[TIME(hr)]
[ ,.000,000Jk,,,o,,J [379~ JL[n~JJ[hr J g. Collected vapor samples. 7,900 / ,2.000 .... ponds to Field/ Lahnrato. analyticalresult$.
Molecular weight of gasoline is estimated at 100 lb~mole. I mole: -'179ft~. STF = South Tank Farm
c. Data $.ssumed firom previous monitoring event. WTF = West Tar& Farm
TABLE 3f GEOMATRIX
MONTHLY SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION AND AIR SPARGE OPERATIONS SUMMARY REPORT
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
NOVEMBER 2000
=
Pilot/Process Daily TPHg Cumulative Air Sparge System HCVES Daily
Date Data Source Notes Process Concentration' Process Flow Manifold Vacuum Temperalure Removedb TPHg Removed Status Oi)erating Time
(ppmv) (s~fm) (in. Hg) (°F) (lb) (lb) (on/of0 (hr)
ST~ , WTF I STF , WTF ] STF+WTF , STF ] WTF [STF+WTE[ S~ , WTFI STF I WTF[ STF+WTF swF , WTF STg+,VTF STF , WTg STF ] WTF
1 I/I/00 ¢ ¢ 0 0 1,514,060 0 off 0 0
I 1/2/00 d d 7,000 7.727 1.790 735 645 90 5.7 0.6 1.076 806 24 1,514,890 9 off 9 9
1 I/3/00Technician Technician e f 6,000 6.833 1.800 755 630 125 5.2 1.5 1,100 1.094 53 1.516,038 14 off 14 14
I [/4/00d d 6,000 6.833 1.800 755 630 125 5.2 1.5 1.100 1.945 95 1,518,078 24 off 24 24
I I/5/00d d 6.000 6,833 1.800 755 630 125 5.2 1.5 1, I OO 1,945 95 1.520.118 24 off 24 24
I [/6/00d d 6,000 6,833 [.800 755 630 [25 5.2 1.5 [,100 1.945 95 1,522,158 24 off 24 24
1 UT/O0 d d 6.000 6,833 1,800 755 630 125 5.2 1.5 1,100 1.945 95 [,524,199 24 off 24 24
11/8/00 Technician Technician e f 9,700 11,206 2.460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1.062 3.t63 135 1,527.497 24 · off 24 24
I I/9/00 I~ ~ 0 0 1,527.497 0 off 0 0
I Ill 0/00 d d 9.700 11.206 2.460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1,062 1,977 84 1.529,558 15 off 15 15
11/11/00 c c 0 0 1,529,558 0 off 0 0
[ 1/12/00 d d 9,700 l 1,206 2.460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1,062 1,713 73 1.531.345 13 off 13 13
11/13/00d d 9.700 11.206 2.460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1,062 1.186 51 1.532,582 9 off 9 9
I 1/14/00 d d 9,700 11,206 2.460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1,062 3.031 129 1.535.743 23 off 23 23
11/15/00d d 9.700 11,206 2,460 755 625 130 5.2 1.5 1,062 2,768 118 1.538,629 2l off 21 21
I 1/16/00 Technician Technician e, h f, h 9,280 / 11,00010,370 2,250/2,500 745 645 100 6 1.3 1,092 3,019 95 1,541,742 24 off 24 - 24
I l/I 7/00 d d 9,280 10,370 2,250 745 645 100 6 1.3 1,092 3,019 95 1,544,856 24 off 24 24
I 1/l 8/00 d d 9,280 ! 0,370 2,250 745 645 100 6 1.3 [ .092 3,019 95 1,547,970 24 Off 24 24
I 1/19/00 d d 9,280 10,370 2,250 745 645 100 6 1.3 1,092 3,019 95 1,551,083 24 off 24 24
11/20/00d d 9,280 10,370 2,250 745 645 100 6 13 1.092 3,019 95 1,554,197 24 off 24 24
11/21/00d d 9.280 10.370 2,250 745 645 100 ' 6 I. 3 1,092 3,019 95 1,557,311 24 off 24 24
11/22/00Technician Technician e f 7,400 8.610 1.400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1.103 2.409 74 1,559,793 24 off 24 24
11/23/00d d 7,400 8,610 1,400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1,103 2,409 74 1,562,276 24 off 24 24
[ 1/24/00 d d 7,400 8,6 [ 0 [,400 745 620 125 6 1 4 I. t 03 2,409 74 1,564,759 24 off' 24 24
11/25/00d d 7,400 8,6 ! 0 1,400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1,103 2,409 74 1,567,242 24 off 24 24
11/26/00d d 7,400 8,610 1,400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1,103 2,409 74 1,569,725 24 off 24 24
I 1/27/00 d d 7,400 8,610 1,400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1,103 2,409 74 1,572,208 24 off 24 - 24
I 1/28/00 d d 7,400 8,610 1.400 745 620 125 6 1.4 1,103 2,409 74 1,574,691 24 off 24 24
11/29/00Technician Technician e f 7,720 9,518 1,760 755 580 175 6.25 1.8 l,ll0 2,495 130 1,577,316 24 off 24 24
11/30/00d d 7.720 9.518 1,760 755 580 175 6.25 1.8 1.t 10 2,495 130 1,579.941 24 off 24 24
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF and WTF During the Reporting Period Ob) 65,881
Cumulative TPHg Removed From STF During the Reporting Period (lb) 63,485
Cumulative TPHg Removed From WTF During the Reporting Period (lb) '2,396
STF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 583
WTF Operating Duration for the Reporting Period (hr) 583
Cumulative TPHg Removed (STF and WTF) Subsequent to Initial Start-Up (lb) 1,579,941
STF and WTF Gas Utility Usage for the reporting period (Therms) 28,518
STF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) 67,800
WTF Electrical Utility Usage for the reporting period (kWh) I00
STF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 81
WTF Percent Up-Time During the Reporting Period (%) 81
a. Field concentrations include hydrocarbon range fi.om C 1 to C 12. d. Dam assumed from previous monitoring event
b. Hydrocarbon removal for this month is calculated using the laboratory analytical results for the samples e. STF process flow = combined flow - W'IT process flow. STF process conceno'afon calculated using
collected on November 16, 2000 and adjusted for the process concentrations measured, individual and combined flowrates, and W'IF and combined process concentrations.
-- x[T1ME ( hr) ]TP Hg(ppmv) 100/b ' lmole ft3 60nm t WTFmanifoldliedintoSTFrnanifold. WTFmanifoldvalvecrackedoperr
[. 1,000,000 J[_moleJ L379fi / L [.m~dJ C nr / g. System shut down possibly due to pilot failure du¢ to high winds.
h. Collected vapor samples. 9,280 / I 1,000 corresponds to Field/Laboratory analytical results.
Moleculat weight of gasoline is estirnated at lOO IbOnole. l mole = $79 ftJ.
c. System shut down due to high level in knock out vessel. STF ~ South Tank Farm
WTF = Wnst Tank Farm
GEOMATRIX
TABLE 4a Page I of 2
INDIVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED AUGUST 24, 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Manifold Screen Open/ Concentrations
WELL NO. Location Interval Closed (ppmv) Notes
dW-4 STF 33' - 55' open 3,620
MW-5 STF 75'- 10O' C NM
MW-8 STF 70' - 90' C NM
MW-12 STF 74'- 104' C NM
SE-MW-23a STF ..... 50;- 130' C NM
SE-AS/VE-44a STF l 0' - 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-44b STF 60'- 100' open NM
SE-AS/VE-45a STF 10'. 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-45b STF 60~- 100' open NM
SE-AS/VE-46a STF 10'- 50' open >10,000
SE-AS/VE-46b STF 60'- 10ft open >10,000
E-VE-47a STF l 0' - 40' open NM
SE-VE-47b STF 50'- 80' open NM ..
SE-VE-47c STF 90'- 120' open NM
'SE-VEo48a STF I 0' - 4o' opgn NM
SE-VE-48b STF 50' - 80' op~p NM
~E-VE~48c STF 90'- 120' C NM
SE-¥E-49a STF 10' - 40' open 1,730
SE-¥E-49b STF 50' - 80' open >10,000
SE-VE-49¢ STF 90' - 120' C NM
SE-VE-50a STF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-50b STF 50'- 80' C NM
SE-VE-50c STF 90'- 120' ... C NM ...
TSG-AS,rVE-52a STF 10' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-52b STF 10;- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-53a STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-53b STF I 0' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-54a STF I 0' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-54b STF 10' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-55a STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-55b STF 10'. 70' C NM
TSG-VEZ56 STF I 0' - 70' C
TSG-VE-57 STF 10'- 70' open NM
TSG-VE-58 STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-VE-59 STF l 0' - 70' C 80
GMX-AS/VE-6'3 STF 45' - 75' open 5,600
I
I ?:~Sg25.O00.O\Sg25.00t .0\2ndhal f0O~Tables.xis\lndiv. $¥E WeI~ Cone. g-244}0
GEOMATRIX
TABLE 4a Page 2 of 2
iNDiVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED AUGUST 24, 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Manifold Screen Open/ Concentrations Notes
WELL NO. Location Interval Closed (ppmv)
3MX-AS/VE-64 STF 45'- 75' open 6,280
3MX-AS/VE-65 STF 45' - 75' open > 10,000
MW-7 WTF 75' - 95' C NM
SE-MW-9(R) WTF 60'- 125' C NM
W-I 5 WTF 72' - 92' C ' NM
MW-16 WTF 78'- 108' C NM
SE-MW-24s WTF 60'- 160' C NM
SE-VE/AS-34a WTF 40' - 80' C NM
$E-VE/AS-34b WTF 90~ - 130~ C NM
SE-VE/AS-35a WTF 40' - 80' C NM
SE-VE/AS-35b WTF 90' - 130' C NM
SE-VE-40a WTF 10'. 40' open NM ..
SE-VE-40b WTF 50'- 80' open NM
SE-VE-40c WTF 90'- [20' C NM
SE-VE-42a WTF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-42b WTF 50' - 80' open NM
SE-VE-42c WTF 90'- 120' C NM
SE-VE-43a WTF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-43b WTF 50' - 80' C NM
$E-VE-43c WTF 90'- 120' C NM
STF ~ former south tank farm
WTF = former west tank farm
= closed
NM = not measured
!
I
!
I P:\5825.0OO.OX5825.001.0\2ndhalt~O\Tables.xls\lndiv. SVE Well Cone. 8-24410
GIEOMATRIX
i TABLE 4b Page I or2
INDIVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED OCTOBER 17, 2000
I FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
WELL NO. Manifold Screen Open/ Concentrations Notes
I Location Interval Closed (ppmv)
MW-4 STF 33'- 55' 1/4 open .2,530
i MW-5 STF 75'- 100' C NM
MW-8 STF 70' - 90' C NM
MW-12 STF 74'- 104' C NM
i .S..E-MW-23a STF 50'- 130' C NM
SE-AS/VE-44a STF 10'- 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-44b STF 60'- 100' 1/2 open 5,130
I SE-AS/VE-45a STF 10' - 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-45b STF 60' - 100' I/4 open 820
SE-AS/VE-46a STF 10'- 50' C NM
I I,SE-AS/¥E-46b STF 60' - 100' 1/2 open >10,000
~E-¥E-47a STF 10' - 40' C .. NM
5E-VE-47b.. STF 50'- 80' 1/2 open >10,000
I ~E-VE-47c STF 90'- 120' open 990
5E-VE-48a' STF. 10' - 40' I/4 open 4,600
~E-VE-48b STF 50' - 80' 1/4 open 3,950
I 5E-VE-48c STF 90'- 120' C NM
l~E-¥E-49a STF 10' - 40' !{4 open 1,020 ...
~E~VE49b 'STF 50' - 80' I/4 open 6,340.
I ~E-VE49c STF 90'- 120' C NM
5E-VE-50a STF 10' - 40' C NM
~E-VE-50b STF 50' - 80' C NM
I SE-VE-50c STF 90'- 120' C NM
I'
TSG-AS/'VE-52a STF 10'- 70' C NM
FSG-AS/VE-52b STF 10' - 70' C NM
I [TSO-AS/VE-53a STF 10'- 70' C NM
FSG-AS/VE-53b STF I 0' - 70' C NM
FSG-AS/VE-54a STF 1 O' - 70' C NM
I'SG-AS/VE-54b STF I 0'. 70' C NM ....
FSG-AS/VE-55a STF 10' - 70' 1/4 open 640
FSG-AS/VE-5~'b STF 10' - 70' C NM
I FSG-VE-56 STF 10'- 70' C NM
[TSG-VE:57 STF 10'- 70' 1/4 open 360
I rSG-VE-58 STF 10'- 70' C NM
[TSG-VE-59 STF 10'- 70' C NM
!GMX-AS/VE-63 STF 45' - 75' 1/4 open 8,400
I P:~5825.000.O\5825.00[.O~2ndhalfOO\Tables xls\bldiv. SVE Wcll Conc 10-[ 7~00
GEOMATRIX
TABLE 4b 2 of 2
Page
INDIVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED OCTOBER 17, 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Manifold Screen Open/ ' Concentrations
WELL ~'O. Location Interval Closed (ppmv) Notes
~MX-AS/VE-64 STF 45' - 75' open > 10,000
GMX-AS/VE-65 STF 45' - 75' open >10.000
3MX-AS/VE-66 ST~ 45'- 75' I/4 open 850
VIW-7 WTF 75' - 95' C NM
5E.-MW-9(R1 WTF 60'- 125' C NM
¥1W- 15 WTF 72' - 92' C NM
kdW-16 WTF 78'- 108' C NM
5E-MW-24s WTF 60'- 160' C NM
$E-VE/AS-34a WTF 40'- 80' C NM
SE-VE/AS-34b WTF 90'- 130' C NM
SE-VE/AS-35a WTF 40'- 80' C NM
5E-VE/AS-35b WTF 90'- 130~ C NM
5E-VE-40a WTF lC.' - 40' open 660
5E-VE-40b WTF 50'- 80' open >10,000
5E-VE-40c WTF 90'- 120' C NM
5E-VE-42a WTF iff - 40' C NM
"
SE-VE-42b WTF 50'- 80' open 3,570 ,,
SE-VE-42c WTF 90'- 120' C NM
5E-VE-43a WTF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-43b WTF 50' - 80' C NM
SE-VE-43c WTF 90'- 120' C NM
STF = former south tank farm
WTF = former west tank farm
NM = not measured
= closed
I
!
I P:~5825,000.O~5825,001.O~2ndhalt'O0\Tables,×ls\tndiv. SVEWeli Coelc 10-17-00
TABLE 4c Page.l of 2
INDIVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED NOVEMBER 22, 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
WELL NO. Manifold Screen Open/ Concentrations Notes
Closed
Location Interval (pprav)
MW-~f STF 33'- 55' 1/4 opqn 2230
MW-5 STF 75'- 100' C NM
MW-8 STF 70' - 90' C NM
MW-12 STF 74'- 104' C NM
SE-MW~23a STF 50'- 130' C NM
SE-AS/VE-44a STF 10'- 50' ~ NM
SE-AS/VE-44b STF 60'- 10ft 1/4 open 6940
SE-AS/VE*45a STF 10'- 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-45b STF 60'- 100' 1/4 open 780
SE-AS/VE-46a STF 10' - 50' C NM
SE-AS/VE-46b STF 60'- 100' 1/2 open >10,000
SE-VE-47a STF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-47b STF 50' - 80' l/2 open >10,000
SE-VE-47c STF 90' - 120' open 8 t0
SE-VE-48a STF 10' - 40' 1/4 open NM
SE-VE-48b STF 50' - 80' 1/4 opeN NM
SE-VE-48c STF 90'- 120' 1/2 open 5710
SE-VE-49a STF 10' - 40' 1/2 open 790
SE-VE-49b STF 50'- 80' 1/2 open 5340
SE-VE-49c STF 90'- 120' C NM
SE-VE-50a ' STF 10' - 40' C NM
SE-VE-50b STF 50' - 80' C NM
SE-VE-50c STF 90'- 120' C NM
TSG-AS/VE~52a STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-52b STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/V E-53a STF 1 O' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-53b STF 10'- 70' C NM
TSG-AS/VE-54a STF 10'- 70' 1/4 open 940
TSG-AS/VE-54b STF i0' - 70' C NM
TSG-AS~VE-55a STF 10'- 70' 1/4 open NM
TSG-AS/VE-55b STF 10' - 70' C NM
TSG-VE-56 ST~ 10' - 70' C NM
TSG-VE-57 STF I0'- 70' 1/4 open 250
TSG-VE-58 STF 10' - 70' C NM
TSG-VE-59 STF 10'- 70' C NM
GMX-AS/VE-63 STF 45' - 75' 1/2 open 270
1
I P:L~g25.000 0L5825.00 l.O~2ndhaWO0\Tnbl~s.xls\lndiv. SVE W~II Conc. I 1-22-00
GEOMATRIX
TABLE 4c l'age 2 of 2
INDIVIDUAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL CONCENTRATIONS AT STF MEASURED NOVEMBER 22, 2000
FORMER SUNLAND OIL REFINERY, 2152 COFFEE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
WELL NO. Manifold Screen Open/ Concentrations Notes
Location Interval Closed (ppmv)
GMX-AS/VE-64 STF 45'- 75' open 620
GMX-AS/VE-65 STF 45'- 75' open 7010
GMX-AS/VE-66 STF 45'- 75' I/2 open 640
VIW-7 WTF 75' - 95' C NM
3E-MW-9(R) WTF 60'- 125' C NM
MW-15 WTF 72' - 92' C NM
VlW-16 WTF 78'- 108' C NM
~E-MWv24s WTF 60'- 160' , C NM
.qE-VE/AS-34a WTF 40' - 80' C NM
.~E-VE/AS-34b WTF 90'- 130' C NM
~E-VE/AS-35a WTF 40' - 80' C NM
3E-VE/AS-35b WTF 90'- 130' C NM
SE-VE-40a WTF l 0' - 40' open 370
SE-VE-40b WTF 50'- 80' open >10,000
3E-VE-40¢ WTF 90'- 120' C NM
3E-VE-42a WTF 10' - 40' C NM
~E~VE-42b WTF 50'- 80' 3550
open
SE-VE-42c WTF 90' - 120' C NM
~E-VE-43a WTF 10' - 40' C NM
~E-VE-43b WTF 50' - 80' C NM
~E-VE-43c WTF 90' - 120' C NM
STF = former south tank farm
WTF = former west tank farm
NM ~ not measured
= closed
I
I
I
I
I
I. P:\SN25.000.0LSR25.001.0~.2 ndhal f00\Ta)~ les .xls~h,Aiv. SVE Well Cone. 1 [ -22-00
APPENDIX A
GIEOMATRIX
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
AND
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS
~ AMERICAN
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
I~ Page I
i Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA project No.: A2.91249
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 06/28/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Oil Refinery Date Reported: 07/05/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8015M(Gasoline) - ~ ----~--- ~ '-
I Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
08418 W-Tank farm 06/28/00 06/30/00 1200 5
08419 S-Tank Farm 06/28/00 06/29/00 8600 5
i MRL: Method Reporting Limit
American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311
i Te1:(818)998-5547 · · Fax'(818)998-7258
"AMERICAN 1
· ANALYTICS LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
I Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291249
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 06/28/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Oil Refinery Date Reported: 07/05/00
.- Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
I Method: EPA 8020 (BTEX)
i Date Sampled: 06/28/00 06/28/00
, Date Analyzed: 06/30/00 06/29/00
AA ID No.: 108418 108419
Client ID No.: W-Tank farm S-Tank Farm MRL
'1 Compounds:
Benzene 14 93 0.1
,J Ethylbenzene 5.3 34 0.1
Toluene 12 200 0.1
i Xylenes 27 290 0.1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
i American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue. Chatsworth California 91311
Te1'(818)998-5547 · · Fax.(818)998-7258
.~ ANALYTICS LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291249
I Project Date Received: 06/28/00
No.:
N/A
· Project Name: Former Sunland Oil Refinery Date Reported: 07/05/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmv
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
i Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
~/' 108418 W-Tank farm 06/28/00 06/30/00 7.9 1
108419 S-Tank Farm 06/28/00 06/29/00 110 1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
,!
.!
American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue Chatsworth, California 9'1341
~1' Te1'(8'18)998-5547 . · Fax-(8'18)998-7258
9302 South Garfield Avenue '-
South Gate, Ca 90280-3896 ' Analytical Laboratory:
Phone (310) 928-0100 Fax (310) 928-0391 Record Lab~
: CONSULTANT: ~~~ O~ ~- E
ADDRESS: ~'~, ~~~__ ~ ~
PROJECTS~ ~PROJECTNAME: = ~ m m
'TAT: ~24.r ~48Hr ~72.r ~ Normal (S Days} DOthor( ) = ~ ~ ~
SHIPPED VIA: ~Walkl. DCourier ~FedEx ~Other( ) Z ~ ~ g g m ~
'~~ ~-~ t~%q COMMENTS:
SAMPLERS NAME ~ DATE~IME
~ Printed Name: Printed Name:
Printed
Name:
Slgnaturo~-~.. ~ ~ ~ Signature: Signature:
Dat~l~ ~2~~ Date~ime: Date~ime:
~ff~ ~'-~ Printed Name: Printed Name:
Printed
Name:
Signature:~'~ : Signature: Signature:
Oate~ime: ~'/~ ~/~ J~ J g~ ~ Datealme: Date~!me:
GEOMATRIX
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No,: A291278
Project No,: SUNI_AND CAL Date Received: 08/01/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/02/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV ~
Method: EPA 8015M(Gasoline)
Date .Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
109267 W,TankFarm 07/31/00 08/01/00 2500 5
109268 S,TankFarm 07/31/00 08/01/00 14000 5
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
1' George Havalias
. Laboratory Director
American Analyt cs · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, Calilornia 9'13'~
1'ei'(8'18)998-5547 · · Fax'(8'~8)998-7258
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
'Page
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291278
Project No.: SUNLAND CAL Date Received: 08/01/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/02/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8020 (BTEX)
I Date Sampled: 07/31/00 07/31/00
Date Analyzed: 08/01/00 08/01/00
AA ID No.: 109267 109268
i Client ID No.: W.TankFarm S.TankFarm MRL
Compounds:
Benzene 21 190 0.1
'J Ethylbenzene 6.4 63 0.1
Toluene 14 190 0.1
I' Xylenes 35 350 0.1
i M
RL: Method Reporting Limit
1
George HavaliaS .
,i! Laboratory Director
I American Anc~lytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, Calilorn a 9'~311
', Te1'(818)998-5547 · ° Fax'(818)998-7258
'~i~I LABORATORY ANALySIs RESULTS
Bi,________/
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing AA No.:
Company
Project
A291278
Project No.: SUNLAND CAL Date Received: 08/01/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/02/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmv
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
109267 W.TankFarm' 07/31/00 08/01/00 10 1
109268 S.TankFarm 07/31/00 08/01/00 120 1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
i George Havalias
.Laboratory Director
i American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 913~
Te1'(8'18)998-5547 ,, · Fax-(8~ 8)998-7258
/e~ I1~ 9302 South Garfield ^v nut aaaiytical kaDoratory:
~ Soutt~ gate, Ca 90280-3896
~ Phone (310) 928-0100 F~ (310) 928-0391 aecord Lab~
SITEISTATION ADDRESS: ~S~ ~~ ~
TAT: ~24Hr ~48Hr ~72Hr ~ Normal (S Days) ~Other( )
SHIPPED VIA: ~ Walk In ~ Courier ~Fed Ex ~Other ( ) Z
~ q-~ fi/~5~ COMMENTS:
SAMPLERS NAME DAT~IME
Printed Name' :~' ~ Printed Name: Printed Name:
Signatur.~~ __ ~~ Signature: Signature:
Dateline: ~~ ~ ~ Date~ime: Data.line:
Printed Name: ~O~~--~ ' Printed Name: Printed Name:
Signature: . ~ - ~ Signature: Signature:
GEOMATRIX
iANAL~.rT~C$ LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
I Client:~World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A2.91340
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 09/15/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 09/20/00
i Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8015M(GasoIine)
I Date Date
AA i.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
I 111306 W.TankFarm 09/14/00 09/15/00 1800 5
111307 S.TankFarm 09/14/00 09/15/00 13000 5
I MRL: Method Reporting Limit
I
I
I
I
I
'l
'I
I
George Havalias
I Laboratory
Director
[~ A~IERtCAN 1
ANAL'f'TiCS LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No,: A2.91340
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 09/15/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 09/20/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8020 (BTEX)
Date Sampled: 09/14/00 09/14/00
Date Analyzed: 09/15/00 09/15/00
AA ID No.: 111306 111307
Client ID No.: W.TankFarm S.TankFarm MRL
Compounds:
Benzene 12 120 0.1
Ethylbenzene 5.3 57 0.1
Toluene 4.2 190 0.1
Xylenes 21 300 0.1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
i George Havalias
Laboratory Director
'
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company ~ Project No.: ~91340
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 09/15/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refine~ Date RepoSed: 09/20/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmv
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
Date Date
~ I.D. No. Client I.D. No, Sampled Anal~ed Results MRL
111306 W.TankFarm 09/14/00 09/15/00 5.1 1
111307 S.TankFarm 09/14/00 09/15/00 89 1
MRL: Method RepoSing Limit
George Havalias
Laboratory Director
I C
~.~] Sot,th Gate, Ca 90280-3896 PO Ol _
~ l)ho,~e (31 O) 928-0100 Fax (310) 928-0391 Record Lab#
TAT: ~ 24Hr / 8Hr ~ 72Hr ~ Normal (5 Days) ~ Other ( ) ~ ~ g m
'ED VIA: ~Z~(e~~ ~Walkln OCourier dE, ~Other( ) Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ m = = .
SAlaPLE ID MATRIX ':':DATE }:'TIMEi~ '
P,i. Jad Hame: ~ Printed Name: ~ _ Printed Name:
G EOMATRIX
,~M ERICAN I
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
I Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291326
· Project No.: N/A Date Received: 08/25/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/28/00
' I Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
, Method: EPA 8015M(Gasoline)
Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. SamPled' Analyzed Results MRL
I 110394 West TF-Proc 08/24/00 08/25/00 2500 5
11.0,395 South TF-Proc 08/24/00 08/25/00 10000 5
I MRL: Method Reporting Limit
I
George Hav~lias
LaboratOry Director
I ~ American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 9t311
..... Tel-(8'l 8)998-5547 ° · Fax'(818)998-7258
~'AMERICAN '~
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291326
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 08/25/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/28/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8020 (BTED0 ..
Date Sampled: 08/24/00 08/24/00
Date Analyzed: 08/25/00 08/25/00
AA ID No.: 110394 110395
Client iD No.: West TF-Proc South TF-Proc MRL
ComPounds:
Benzene ~ -PP 140 0.1
Ethylbenzene 12 .79 0.1
Toluene 18 220 O. 1
Xylenes 64 450 O. 1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
!
George Havalias
I Laboratory Director ~
I American Analytics * 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatswort. h, Cai fornia 9131~,
Tel'(8'~ 8)998-5547 · · Fax'(818)998-7258
~'AMERICAN /
~ LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
I Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291326
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 08/25/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 08/28/00
I Sample Matrix: Vapor · Units: ppmv
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
I Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No, Sampled Analyzed Results~ · MRL
I 110394 West TF-Proc 08/24/00 08/25/00 11 1
110395 South TF-Proc 08/24/00 08/25/00 69 1
· J MRL: Method Reporting Limit
!
'1
George Haval~'as
Laboratory Director
American Ana ytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, Cai forn~a 9.131t
Tel:.(8 I 8)998-5547 · * Fax'.(818)998-7258
~ ' South Gate, Ca 90280-3896
~ Phone (3103 928-0100 F~ (3103 928-0391 Record Lab~
PROJECT ~:~~ 0~PROJEC'T NAME:
TAT: ~ 24Hr ~48Hr ~72Hr ~ Normal (5 Days). '
SHIPPED VIA: ~Walkln ~Courier ~FedEx ~Other( ) Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
SAMPLERS NAME DAT~IME
Printed Na~ ~ m~ ~ Printed Name: Printed Name:
Signature: ~ ~ ~ Signature: Signature:
G EOMATRIX
iAMERICAN
iANALYTICS LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291382
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 10/18/00 '
Project Name: Former sunland Refinery Date Reported: 10/21/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 801 SM(Gasoline)
Date Date
AA I,D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
112924 West Tank 10/1' 7/00 10/19/00 2800 5
112925 South Tank 10/17/00 10/19/00 1'2000 5
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
'1
IGeorge Hava.(ias
Laboratory Director
,I American Analytics ~, 9765 Eton Avenue Cinats',,vortn,
·
Tel'(818)998-5547 ,~ · Fax'(8! 8)'99..8-7258
ANALYTICS J
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291382
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 10/18/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 10/21/00
Sample Vapor ppmV
Matrix:
Units:
Method: EPA 8020 ,(BTEX)
Date Sampled: 10/17/00 10/17/00
Date Analyzed:~ 10/19/00 10/19/00
AA ID No,: 112924 112925
Client ID No.: West Tank South Tank MRL
Compounds:
Benzene 21 110 0.1
Ethylbenzene 12 52 0.1
Toluene 10 170 0.1
Xylenes 53 300 O. 1
i MRL:
Method Reporting Limit
George Haval(as
Laboratory I~irector
American Ana-tytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, Ca iorn a
9'~ 3'I t
Te1'(818)998-5547 .., ~, Fcx'~'318)g9:3-7258
i AMERICAN
~ LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
S
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291382
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 10/18/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 10/21/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units:
ppmv
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
112924 West Tank 10/17/00 10/19/00 8.2 1
112925 South Tank 10/17/00 10/19/00 79 1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
,!
!
George Havahas
Laboratory Director
American Analytics ,, 9~65 Eton Avenue, Ch,,.q~,sworth. Cc iforn
Tel'(818)998-5547 ~
~ 9302 South Garfield Avenue Analytical Laboratory:
~ South Gate, Ca 90280-3896 pg V of
~ Phone (310) 928-0100 Fax (310) 928-0391 Record Lab#
SITE/STATION # '~,-~'" ~l. it,V~j/%i~Jk' ~ '
SITE/STATION AnORESS: ~t~Z ~~,
CONSULTANT: z ~
ADDRESS: ~ ~-~~~ <
Z ~ :~.
* O
PROJECT ~: ~O~_~ ~PROJECT NAME: ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ':'"
TAT: ~ 24Hr ~48Hr U72Hr U Normal (5 Days) ~Other( ) ~ ~ *~ ~ ~
SHIPPEDVIA~ ~Walkln DCourier ~FedEx ~Other( ) Z ~ g ~ ~
SAMPLE ID · MATRIX :~.~'DATE~:~;.;.~'i'~:~ :~;~}~;~:?SO'i'~'S~ODGE~WA~E~'? :::~ ~' C;:~ ~'REMARKS
~-~?~~ /~q~ COMMENTS:
SAMPLERS NA~E DATElinE
j) RELiNQuisHED~: ,~. ~ . ;~:2}R~Q0'iS~"ED:~y~?/~;~:)~);~ 3) R~iN~0is:~ED~Y~]:?.,::.'~'::':~:; ~:
Printed Name: ~~; ~~ Printed Name:signature: Printed Name:signature:
Signature: ~ Date~ime: Date~ime:
Date/Time:
'1) RECEIVED BY: . ~ ' ' ' ;~:;~ ";'~'5:" :~:~: :;2) RECE=i~EDBy~:::: '~:~.~':77::~..~ ;~';'./~.;. ~?~;:";'~:.~;/~:~'~ ~[::;::~/.~:.~ ~.i;'3)RECEiVED:.By;~;~..:...'.. '-': ' ~ ~;~ '
- ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Printed Name: Printed Name:
Signature: ~~ "~ Signature: Signature:
GEOMATRIX
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291428
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 11/17/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 11/20/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor UnitS: PpmV
Method: EPA 8015M(Gasoline)
I Date Date
AA I.D. No. Client I.D. No. Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
I 114072 West Tank 11/16/00 11/17/00 2500 5
114073 South Tank 11/16/00 11/17/00 11000 5
I MRL: Method Reporting Limit
George Havahas
Laboratory Director
American Analytics * 9.765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, Ca iornio 9t3t'I
Te1:'(8'18)998-5547 ~ o Fax'(SJ 8)998-7258
Page 1
Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291428
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 11/17/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 11/20/00
Sample. Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: EPA 8020 (BTEX)
Date Sampled: 11/16/00 11/16/00
Date Analyzed: 11/17/00. 11/17/00
AA ID No.: 114072 114073
Client ID No.: West Tank South Tank MRL
Co.mpounds:
Benzene 23 100 0.1
Ethylbenzene 10 38 0.1
Toluene 11 120 0.1
Xylenes 34 270 0.1
MRL: Method Reporting Limit
George H av,a~lias
Laboratory Director
American Analytics · 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311
Te1'(848)998-5547 . ~, Fax'(SJ 8)998-7258
i l ANAL~,CS1 LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Page 1
I Client: World Oil Marketing Company AA Project No.: A291428
Project No.: N/A Date Received: 11/17/00
Project Name: Former Sunland Refinery Date Reported: 11/20/00
Sample Matrix: Vapor Units: ppmV
Method: MTBE (EPA 8020)
I Date Date
· AA I.D. No. Client I,D, No, Sampled Analyzed Results MRL
I 114072 West Tank 11/16/00 11/17/00 9.5 1
114073 South Tank 11/16/00 11/17/00 71 1
I MRL: Method Reporting Limit
I
I
I /
I George Havadas '
Laboratory Director
I American Analytics ,, 9765 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311
Te1'(8'18)998-5547 o o Fax.(818)998-7258
"y~~Anal ' '
{ ~ 9302 Sou~h Garfield Avenue ·
Souc~ G~e, C~ 90280-~896
Phone (310) 928-0100 Fax (310) 928-0391 Record Lab~ pg
PROJECT ~:~ ~ , ~ ~ ~PROJ~CT NAME:
~ 24Hr ~q~'SHru~ 72Hr ~ Normal (5 Days) u~ Other ( )
TAT:
,
u
SHIPPED VIA: ~ Walk In ~ Courier ~FedEx ~Other { ) Z
SAMPLE ID ~ MATRIX: DATE::;.~:~::.~TiME;)r';E~B:-'ID~7;,,,.:~ ?
SAMPLERS NAME DATE~IME
~ RELINQUISHED BY: ': .':.;'7:.::':::,:..::?;;~;: :2)'R~iNQ0i'SHED~'~?~
Signature: ~<[~ ~~ Signature: Signature:
Datelfim¢. (~ ~ ~ [~ Date~ime: Date~ime:
~EC~IVE~Y~ { .. :~' 7~":}:?-. ~2)'.:RE~Ei~ED'B~:~:..~
Printed Name: ~ ~O~v~-~ . ....... Printed Name: ' Printed Name:
Signature: _~ ~ .... c~.~' Signature: Signature:
~eJf]~B~~- (')~ ~ ' 9~) ~ ~ Date~ime: Data.ires: