Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UNDERGROUND TANK FILE #2
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2700 M Street HEALTH OIq;ll:~R' ~ ,-" ·" Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hel~t'tso~ M.D. Mailing Address: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reicflarcl Bakersfield. California 93301 (805) 861-3636 Novembe~ 17, 1988 Clifford Bressler c/o Mr. Jim Clements P.O. Box 81~95 Bakersfield, GA 93308 Re: Real Estate Studies Completed for two parcels once owned by Rancho Laborde Estates in Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr. Clements: The studies completed by Emcon and Associates for two real estate parcels once owned by Rancho Laborde Estate in Bakersfield, Cal'ifornia were reviewed by a representative of this department. The studies described one 320 acre lot bordered by Goffee Road to the West and Fruitvale Avenue to the East; and a 1480 acre lot bordered by Coffee Road to the East, Rosedale Highway to the South and Calloway to the West. The reports provided information on the past use of the properties, possible problems associated with the sites, and assessments completed. An overview of the problem areas along with the department's comments are provided below. The 1480 area lot contained a pesticide storage area which is referenced in a letter dated S~ptember 14, 1988. The pesticide storage area, will be discussed and references will be made to the violations cited in that letter. The 1480 acre parcel had the following items of concern described in the study prepared. 1. A screened oil sump on the South side of the parcel, was described as holding waste crude 6il. The liquid within the sump should be sampled to see if other chemicals of concern as halogenated compounds, PCB's and metals are present in significant levels. The Regional Water Quality Control Board should be advised and allowed to give guidance on the closure of the sumps. Clifford Bressler November 17, 1988 Page 2 2. Two underground gasoline tanks, were-discovered in. an area East of the old pesticide storage area. At present the Kern County Health Department has not received an application for a permit to operate or abandon these tanks. Rancho Laborde Farms is presently violating Sections 3912.4.01 and 3912.5.01 of the local underground tank ordinance. .The tanks must be permitted for operation unless closed, and a closure permi~ must be obtained before removal. Both applications areenclosed. 3. Oil saturated soils were detected around above ground oil storage tanks, and in an area identified as a steam cleaning sump. The samples retrieved in these area were contaminated with heavy hydrocarbons. It is not clear how extensive the contamination is? The extent of contamination should be determined and discussed in a final report which describes any hazards associated with these sites. 4. Three transformers appeared to have been leaking. Only one sample was retrieved near a power pole south of the Calloway canal. No PCBs were detected in the soil sampled. The other two sites should be sampled for PCB contamination. 5. Seventeen irrigation catch basins and one flood control . sump were identified on this parcel. Only one sample was retrieved in one of the irrigation catch basins. The sample was analyzed for organochlorine pesticides and chlorinated herbicides. None of the constituents tested for were detected in the sample. The following questions should be addressed: A. A discussion of the size of the catch basin and whether one sample is representative of this basin. B. The other catch basins should be characterized with a discussion of the rationale for sample strategy discussed to justify the number and location of each sample. Clifford Bressler November 17, 1988 Page 3 One sample in one catch basin does not adequately characterize all catch basins unless the more heavily contaminated is sampled. The relative contamination of each must be known. C. The area to be sampled should include other than organo chlorine pesticides/herbicides such as arsenicals and mercurial compounds. Heavy metal contamination should be ruled ou~ as a significant contaminant. 6. The pesticide storage area located North of the building near Callowa¥ and Hoffman was described as having odorous stained soil by the assessment contractor, the health inspector and the ag inspector. Two samples were retrieved within this area. The samples were retrieved 6" and 10" below grade. They were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides and. chlorinated herbicides. The list obtained from the Ag Commissioner showed that 1482 pesticide containers were removed from this area. The containers held a diverse group of pesticides/herbicides. The following concerns should be addressed: A. The samples retrieved from this area should be . representative of the most contaminated portion of the encaged area, with a discussion provided giving the rational for the location and number of samples retrieved. B. The analysis must show whether most of the suspect pesticides/herbicides are present in the soil sampled. (A complete pesticide/herbicide scan should be completed on the more contaminated sample.) C.. I~ any pesticides are detected in significant quantity, the report should discuss the extent' of contamination and suggest at least three mitigation alternatives, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each. Clifford Bressler November 17, 1988 Page 4 ?. A refuse dump was described east of the friant Kern Canal. Surplus agricultural equipment, used tires, empty oil drums, wood and other refuse was identified as having been dumped in this area. The site may presently be violating Sections 8.28.100 and 8.28.160 of the Kern County Ordinance Code, regarding maintaining the Premises in sanitary condition, and failure to remove refuse twice a week, along with Section 5411 of the California Health and Safety Code regarding the creation of a nuisance. The. items-dumped on site should be inventoried to determine their future use or disposal. Certain items, (the drums) may be sent to a recycler; some equipment may be used or sent to a scrap yard. The owner/operator should provide a plan to the Kern .County Health Department before cleaning this site so that it will not violate regulations provided in the state law or local ordinance. The 320 acre parcel had the following items of concern described in the study prepared. 1. Two oil sumps were noted in the southern portion of the parcel. The liquid within the sump should be sampled to see if other chemicals of concern as halogenated compounds, PCBs, and Metals are presen~ in significant levels. The Regional Water Quality Control Board should- be advised and allowed to give guidance on the closure of the sumps. 2. Oil stains were observed around two oil storage tanks. The stains could be indicative of past leaks/spills. One sample was retrieved 6" below grade at one tank site, on the South/Southeastern portion o~ the parcel. The sample showed soil contamination of heavy hydrocarbons. The extent of contamination should be determined. Crude oil is not presently considered a hazardous waste, however the contamination present should be characterized and any possible threat to groundwater sources addressed. The future plans for the contaminated area should be considered in all discussions addressing mitigation of this site. 3. The irrigation sump had only trace amounts of the pesticides DDE and DDT. The levels detected were not significant. If the sample retrieved was representative of the sump, then the sump appears to be no problem as far as an accumulation of halogenated hydrocarbons. The assessment company should address the rational for retrieving only on~ s~mpie in the sump. Clifford Bressler November 17, 1988 Page 5 4. The sample taken in the Ag acreage had nondetectable levels of halogenated hydrocarbons. If the sample retrieved was either representative of the farming acreage or the worst expected, the area can be assumed free of haiogenated pesticides/herbicides. The rational for retrieving only one sample from this area should be documented. 5. The stained areas beneath the leaking transformers were analyzed. The analysis suggested that there were no PCBs present in the soils sampled. This area appears to have been appropriately characterized, assuming that the stained area was small and the sample was retrieved within the stained area. The letter dated September 14, 1988, required that you submit a site characterization proposal to the Kern County Health Department within 30 days. The studies completed for the Rancho Laborde Estates were deficient in the items stunmarized above. You must submit a report providing rational for activities completed and proposed sampling and analysis for the pesticide storage area, the irrigation drainage basins, and the refuse dump site within 30 days. The application for operation or abandonment of the underground storage tanks must be completed and submitted to this department within 30 days. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you in this matter, and if you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636. erely, ~ Environmental Healt-~pecialist Hazardous Materials Management Pro~ra~ AEG:dr cc: County Administrative Office Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno GARY J. WICKS 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Agency Director Bakersfield. CA 93301 · . ...... Telephorm (805) 861-3636 (805) 1:61-3502 ,,,~':~".;~ .'. Teiecopier (805) 861-3429 STEVE ~ CALLEY ,~ ~:~5:~ ~':':-.- . Directm' R E S 0 U R C E G E' i.'E N T A G E N C Y .?¢.?:, .,-...~... ..... DEPART1VIENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHSERvIcEs February 28, 1990 Clifford Bressler c/o Mr. Jim Clements P. 0. Box 81495 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Re: Mitigation of contaminated soils at the pesticide storage area and the steam cleaning sump on property at the Callowa¥ and Hageman roads intersection, once owned by Rancho Laborde Estates. Dear Mr. Clements: On October 26, 1990 a report was submitted to the Kern County Environmental Health Department summarizing mitigation activities completed on property once owned by Rancho Laborde, north of the intersection of the Calloway and Hageman road intersection. The report was completed by Kern Environmental Services, and described. the removal of approximately fifty four cubic yards of soil from the old pesticide storage area, identified in previous reports as being contaminated, and disposal of the soils at a hazardous waste disposal facility. The hydrocarbon contamination identified in the area once occupied by a steam cleaning sump, had not been removed, however the department received an acknowledgement from Jim Clements in June 1989, of the requirements to cap that area with a concrete slab, or other material approved by this department, and any contaminated soils removed from that area are to be characterized and disposed of as in a manner consistent with state laws and regulations regulating the disposal of hazardous waste, if the soil is characterized as being hazardous. This letter confirms the completion of the investigation and site remediation action in the pesticide storage area at the above site. With the provision thgt the information provided to this- .agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at the pesticide storage site, and that any additional work planned for the old steam cleaning sump must be submitted to this department for review before any work is to be initiated. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the side. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805) 861-3636. Program (~ana_ge_r_ ~ Environmental Health Services Department FILE COI4TENTS SUMMARY Activity Date # Of Tanks cOmments KERN COUNTY - 2700 '~4' Stree;. Ste. 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Environ~entaJ Health Services Department (805) 861-3636 ~ April 4, 1989 Clifford Bressler (Trustee) P.O. Box 81495 Bakersfield, CA 93380 Re: Two Gasoline Tanks at Estate of Jean E. C. Laborde Dear Mr. Bressler: This is to advise you that this Department has reviewed the project results for the subsurface investigation conducted at the Estate of Jean E. C. Laborde, Rt. 1, Box 601, Calloway and Hagman closure permit #A 841-38. Based upon the findings this Department is satisfied that the assessment is complete and no soil contamination resulted from the gasoline tanks at the site. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sin~_r~ly, / / Dan Starkey, REHS. '-,,.,..l Environmental H.ea. lth spe'ei~st i Hazm'dous Materials ManageYnent Program DS:dr dan\nosoil.com cc: File M. Weddell 41~ NE~E RD., BAKE~FIELD, CALI.~RNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 2080 ~ ~on Ave. Re~'~'' 28-~88 :. , ~ ~ ~TE ~ DA~ ~YSIS 22-~-88 22-~88 27-~-88 ~ti~t ~i~ ~~ ~vel ~e ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 Toluene ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 Et~l ~e ~g None ~~ 0 l0 ~Xylene ~/g ~ne ~~ 0 10 ~lene ~/g ~ne ~~ 0 10 o-~lene ~g ~e ~~ 0 10 I sop~pyl ~ene ~g None ~~ 0.10 Pet. ~~~ ~g ~ ~~ 5.00 To~ Pet~le~ ~~~ ~g ~ne ~~ 0. l0 ~ST ~OD: ~ifo~a D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for ~o1~ ~ ~t~r ~is P~ROLE~ ~~NS: ~tifi~tion of volatile p~sent (C1 ~ C20) utiliz~ a ~ol~e fac~r. ~ ~tl~ ~ifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~se volatile ~~~ ~ in a~tion the ~ti~en~ s~ifi~ly def~ on ~s ~. ~ P~~ ~~NS: ~ s~ ~ of ~1 [n~-c~or~- a~] ~ti~ on t~s ~. ~lifo~a D.O.H.S. ~. ~102 AGflI~UL ,.,.,,.,,.,,.,, ATORIES, Inc. PETROL~CUM J.J. ~LIN, R~. CH~ ENG.. 41~ PIE~E RD., BAKE~FIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 ~g~ble ~tics '.' ":* 2080 ~ ~ Ave. ~:" 28,~88 ~field, ~ 93307 At~tion: ~ ~bb 0ean E.C., Laborde ~b No.: 9462-2 "' ~le ~sc: ~t ~ ~ ~2 ~' ~' ~.' ~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~YSIS:; 22-~88 ~-~-88 27-~88' · .., ~~ ~ysis Re~~ ~ti~ent ~ ~s~ ~vel '~ene ~/g ~ne ~~ O. 10 Toluene ~g ~ ~~ O. 10 E~i ~e ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 ~lene ~g ~ne ~~ O. 10 ~lene ~/g ~ ~~ O. 10 o-~l~e ~g ~ ~~ O. 10 Isop~l ~ene ~g No~ ~~ O. 10 Pet.~~~ ~g ~e ~~ 5. O0 To~ Pet~l~ ~~~ ~g ~e ~~ O. 10 ~T ~OD: ~lifo~a D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for G~ol~ D~ ~t~r P~~ ~~NS: ~tifi~tion of volatile k~~~rm p~s~t (C1 ~ C20) utiliz~ ~ifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~se volatile ~~~ ~ ~ ~tion t~ ~ti~en~ s~ifi~ def~ on ~s ~. ~ P~~ ~R~S: ~ s~ ~ of ~1 [~-c~or~z- a~] ~ti~en~ on ~s ~. ~ifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~. ~102 LABORATORIES, InC. PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, IIEG. CHEM. ENG,,. 4100 PIERCE liD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIF~OLIqlA 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeable Aromatics .' RLW Equipment Date 2080 South Union Ave. Report%. ~' 28-Dec-88 Bakersfield, CA 93307 A%tention: Bud McHabb Oean E.C.i. kaborde Lab Nk).: 9462-3 ' Sample Desc: Eas% end tank #1 W2' : DATE S/L~PLE DATE S~IPLE DATE ANALYSIS 22-Dec-88 22-Dec-88 27-Dec-88 Reportir~ Analysis Reportin~ Constituent Units Results Level Benzene u~/g None Detected O. 10 Toluene u~/E None Detected O. 10 Ethyl Benzene u~/E None Detected O. 10 p-Xylene u~/~ None Detected O. 10 m-Xylene u~/~ None I)etect~=d O. 10 o-Xylene u~/E None Detected O. 10 Isopropyl Benzene ug/~ None Detected O. 10 Pet. H~drocarbons ua/~ None Detected 5. O0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 0.10 TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline Dry Matter Basis PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition the constituents specifically defined on f~is report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum to~al of all [non.chlorin- ated] constituents on this report. California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102 ............. -,",,, LABORATORIES, J. J. EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGF..?"' ' P£TI~OLEUM 4100 PIE~E RD., BAKE~FIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-491 I 2080 ~ ~on Ave. ~: ~field, ~ 93307 At~ntion: ~ Mc~bb Jean E;C.~ kaborde ~LL~: ~I~ ~ ~: ~:. ".: 22-~88 22-~-88 27-~-88. ~ti~t ~ ~ul~ ~vel "~ene ~g ~e ~~ O. 10 Toluene ~ ~ne ~~ O. 10 Et~l ~e ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 p-~lene ~/g None ~~ 0.10 ~l~e ~/g ~ne ~~ 0.10 o-~lene ~g ~ne ~~ O. 10 Isop~l ~ene ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 Pet.~~~ ~g ~ ~~ 5. O0 To~ Pe~l~ ~~~ ~g ~ ~~ O. 10 TEST ~OD: ~ifo~ D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for G~ol~ ~ ~t~r P~OLE~ ~~S: ~tifi~tion of volatile p~sent (Cl ~ C20) utiliz~ a ~o1~ racer. ~ ~lifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~se volatile ~~~ ~ ~ addition the ~nsti~en~ s~ifi~lly def~ on ~s ~. T~ P~~ ~~S: ~ s~ ~ of ~1 [non~or~- a~] ~ti~ ~ ~s ~. ~ifo~a D.O.H.S. ~. ~102 ~J. ~. ~.! yst AG~I~UL TUJlE PETIIOLEUM J' J' KLIN, R~. CH~. EG~ :. 41~ PIERCE RD., BAKE~FIELD, CAUFO~IA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 2080 ~ ~on Ave. ~rsfield, ~ 93307 At~tion: ~ ~bb Oean.. E ~C~'~ L~b0~de ~b ~.: 9~2-5 ~le ~c: ~t ~d ~ ~1 ~2' 22-~-88 22-~88 27-~88 ~tl~t ~ ~s~ ~vel ~ene ~/g ~e ~~ 0.10 Tolu~e ~/g ~ ~~ 0.10 Et~l ~e ~/g ~ne ~~ 0.10 ~l~e ~/g No~ ~~ 0.10 ~lene ~g ~ne ~~ 0.10 o-~lene ~/g None ~~ 0.10 Isop~l ~ene ~g ~ ~~ 0. l0 Pet.~~~ ~g ~ ~~ 5.00 To~ Pet~l~ ~~~ ~g ~ne ~~ 0.10 ~ST ~OD: ~ifo~a D,O,H,S, T,P,H, for ~ol~e ~ ~t~r ~is P~~ ~~S: ~tifi~tion of volatile p~sent (C1 ~ C20) utilizi~ a g~ol~e fac~r. ~ ~tl~ ~lifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~se volatile ~~~ ~ in ~dition the ~ns~i~en~ s~ific~ly def~ on t~s ~. ~ ~ROLE~ ~~S: ~ s~ ~ of ~1 [~n-c~orin- a~] ~ti~en~ on ~s ~. ..... ~ifo~a D.O.H.S. ~. ~102 AGIII£UL TUllE ORATORIF. . InC. 41~ PIE~E RD., BAKE~FIELO, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 ~ble ~ti~ (~IL) ~W ~ui~% ~ 2080 ~ ~on Ave. Re~:,::'~ 28r~88 ~~ield, ~ 93307 '~ ....... ':": ,.,.. ;. ~ '~.:.' At~on: ~ Mc~bb Jea~ ~b ~.: 9462-6 · ,..[: .., ,~.,,.,,?,,:[,,::~[:. ..,. ,. ~:~.~,: ,.:.? ..:.~:,. .. ~/:. ~.~, ~~: EEI~ ~ ~: ~~:,",: L:'..i 22-~-88 22-~-88 27-~-88. ~ti~ ~ ~~ ~vel "~e ~/~ ~e ~~ 0. Tolu~e ~g ~e ~~ 0. E~ ~e ~g ~ne ~~ 0.10 ~lene ~/g ~ne ~~ 0. o-~lene ~ ~ ~~ 0. Isop~l ~e ~ ~ ~~ 0. Pet.~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 5.00 To~ Pet~l~ ~~~ ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 TEST ~OD: ~i~o~a D.O.H.S. T.P.H. ~or ~ol~e P~~ ~~S: Q~_euti~i~ion o~ volatile p~sent (C1 ~ C20) utiliz~ a g~ol~ ~r. ~ outlin~ ~i~o~a D.O.H.S. ~s~ volatile ~~~ ~ ~ ~tion t~ ~ti~ s~i~i~ly def~ on ~s ~. ~ ~~ ~~S: ~ ~ ~ o~ all [non-c~or~- a~] ~ti~ on ~s ~. ~li~o~ia D.O.H.S. ~. $102 ........ PETIIOLHU¥ J' J' EGUN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 41~ ~EKE RD., BAKE~FIELD, CALI~0RNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 At~tion: ~ ~bb ~ean::., E ;C:, '~Labo~de 22-~-88 22-~88 27-~-88 ~ti~t ~ Re~ ~vel ~z~e ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 Toluene ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 ~1 ~ene ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 ~lene ~g ~ne ~~ 0 10 o-~lene ~g ~ ~~ 0 10 Isop~l ~rmene ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 Pet. ~~~ ~g ~ ~~ · 5.00 To~l Pe~l~ ~~~ ~g ~ ~~ 0.10 TEST ~OD: ~ifo~a D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for ~ol~e ~ Mater ~is P~ROLE~ ~~S: ~antifi~tion of volatile p~sent (C1 ~ C20) utiliz~ a g~ol~e fac~r. ~ ~tl~ ~lifo~a D.O.H.S. ~se volatile ~~~ ~ in ad~tion the co~ti~en~ s~ifi~lly def~ on ~s ~. ~ ~~ ~~NS: ~ s~ ~ of ~1 [~n-cfAorin- a~] ~tit~en~ on t~s ~. ~ifo~ia D.O.H.S. ~. $102 ORATORIES. Irno. P£TIIOZ£1,tM J' J' ~N, I1~. CHF. qA. ENGB~/:-~ 4~00 PIEliCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 933O8 PHONE 327-49~ I Pur~eable Aromatic~ ." '. '.~. (SOIL) , .~ RLW Equipmen% Data of 2080 South Union Ave. Repoz~: ' 25-Dec-88 Bakersfield, CA 93307 ': Attention: Bud McNabb ~ea~. E.C.' kab0rde Lab No.: 9462-8 Sample Desc: West end tank #2 ~6' DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS COLLECTED: RECEIVED ~ LAB: COMPLETED: 22-Dec-88 22-Dec-88 27-Dec-88 .: Reporting Analysis Reporting Constituent Units Results Level "' Benzene ug/g None Detected O. 10 Toluene u~/g None Detected O. 10 Eth.vl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10 p-Xylene u~/g None Detected O. 10 m-Xylene ug/g None Detected O. 10 o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g None Detected O. 10 Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5. O0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g None De%ected O. l0 TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline Dry Matter Basis C~m~ents: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition the constituents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin- ated] constituents on this report. California D~O..H.S. Cert. #102 ~._~ // ..... ~a~© V'a I. , · ~ ..... ! l~l I .... · , ,~-. ~" .~.~. a". . E . ,..: ..::...,. · '~:--,~, ' .... ..,. ..... .:" : · ' ' '-(~'... ~ · ~A/~--;.,: '. It I aa a la~e quaa~ gen~alor, I ce~i~ lhat I have a program in plaa to reduce the volume and loxia~ of Waste g~l~ 1~ the dwr~ I have me aim minimizes the presal and lul~re lhreat 1~ huma~ health and fha environment; OR, it I am a small q~ant~ Nml~, I Signal~e ; / ~ M~th Day Year ' "'" "~ , , -",' ,' .... ,- -, ~ 18. Transp~er 2 Acknowl~gement of Receipt of Mate~al~ ~ P'~nted/Ty~ Name ~ Signature M~th Day Year E ",, IIIIII 19. Oiscrep~ Indicati~ Space F A C L J 20. Facility ~net or Op~alor Ce~ication o~ ~eceipt of hazardous maleriaia covered by this manilest except as noted in Item 19. P~nted/Type~ Name I Signature . / /~ ~ Month Day Year DHS ~2 AO/aT) G~EEN= HAU~E E~AINS INS~UC~ONS ON ~E BACK EPA 87~22 (Rev. 9-~) ~a ~i~e are ~solete. I Estate 0f'Jean'E.C. Laborde Trustee: Clifford BresSi~r~':R%~'L, "'; '~'-; '~ Calloway a Hageman P.O. Box 81495 ' -:.-2080,~:S6~5~U~!dn;~:[:('.'.'~..~. Bakersfield CA BakersField; CA 93380 :,.', ~ B~kens~ff~$etd~,:~CA~.~,~ .... " Phone: (805)-589-0408~ ' ~-~*'~'~ ...... * '~* '~-~ '~ -,' ' ': ' .. Phone..~: (805)~ 83~. 1100. PE~IT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES March 7~ 19897: ,. -.- 2 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE December'7,F i988~/~: ..' LOCATION APPROVED BY * ~ · ~oe Canas - ., : ................................ POST ON PREMISES ' .... CO~ITIONS AS FOLLOWS: 1. A copy of ~his'permit has been provided to the Kern Coun~y-'Fire'Depar~men~. Perm~t~ee must notify the County Health Depar~men~ at' (805) 86t-3636 two working days prior ~o tank (removal) or inerTing and filling)'to arrange for required inspections(s). · 2. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Health and Fire Departmen% approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30. 3. Soil Sampling .: , Any deviation from sample locations and n~bers or constituent~' to be sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT=30 must receive prior approval by the Health Department. a. A minimum of fou= samples must be =etrieved one-third of the~way~ in from the ends o~ each tank at depths of approximately* two:,* feet and six. feet ~ 4. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than ~hoS~*Its~ed~0n permit and permit application are to be utilized, prior~ approva*l~ mus.t~be~-*granted by the specialis~ listed on the permit .. ' ---;/~'~'~ ~:,::'(.~:~' ":- .' ;- - .~ .. ',% . ~ u- J-:.T' ..'~-. ~'.I~.L-~ ?~.:~-" · ~: . ' ./' % -.~ 6;" ::'Col ~Of}'f..:t~ansporfa~ion:/.' manifestS:": ". Depar~tment~,~within~:.five-.days: of waste 'dis 7. ' All~:~apPl~i. Cable.':State~laWs- for hazardous:~. 0r'.t~ea~ment'; mUst%be:; adhered' to ' :' The.~:Ke'~n~G~u~ be .noti.fiod. befo~e'-:moving' and[or disposin~--.of>'an~i~ 8. Permittee,.:. is -.responSible. for making .sure-~that~.'.~t~n~ record" ..issued with..this permit is' properly 0. Advlse this'. offl=e-of, the time-and date.-of I0. Results ~u~t-b~ ~ub~ltted to this office (canasX841-38.pta) ,7oo r~.,~ s,,.., KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENt Ht*Lm, OmC~. Bske~, Carllornle g33~ Leon M ~be~, M.D. Te!~p~ {~5) ~1-3636 EN~RONMEN~L-H~L~ ~VISI~ Fscllity Name oo0/35613 * * UNDERGROUND T~K DISPOSITION TV~¥2KING RECORD Tbts rot, 1, to be returned to the K~r.n County l{~alth Oepnrt=ent ,ltbln ~ays of ~ccevtance or tank(s) by dl~posal or recycling f~cl]lty. The holder of the per~lt with nuaber noted above lu re~pcq~!ble for Insuring that this for~. Is completed and returned. Sectloq ! - To be filled out ~ .ign~ fo=oval controctor: lonk ~e~oval Contractor: _~ Address ~¢~__~ C~ ~ .... No. of To. nks %~.~.10~ ~ - To be filled out ~[ contractor 770 Authorized representative of contractor certleles ~y ~lgnlng below that ta,,k(s) have been decont~inated In accordance .]th,.~n County ~ealth Department requlreaents. Title .[r~.~tmen~, s torar~, ~[ ~J~.E~sal facJ II t~ 3~C.~P[JA~g 3:.9J.[~1_~: ' ' (Author]zed Repres~vo} * * * 3~ILINO INSTRUCTIONS: Fold In half and staple. Postage and mailing label have already been affixed ~-o ou~,slde for your convenience. NOV 01 '88 .16:52' RANCHO L~BORDE MEMO NDUM :~ To: AMY GREEN ':':~ E)ate: · KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 11/01/88 ,: ?~2qgH0 LABORDE .~.,.: Subjec(: FIGUR]g 2 - RANCHO LABOKDE DUE DILIGENCE STUDY PARCEL B SITE PLAN (EMCON) :~. NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: Action Needed: FOR FUTUtLE INFOR/~XAT!ON'~ ;"R TELECOPIER Nb%LBER IS (805) 589-0631. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL ~. ?~S, OR IF THEY ARE NOT .LEGIBL~-, PLEASE CALL US II~R~ED!ATELY A'f (805) 589-0408. '~' ' ' 2700 M Street '~ HEALTH OFFICER 'akersfield. California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebert~on, M.D. Mailing Address: , ~.~_-' DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1415 Truxtun Avenue Vernon S. Reicherd Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 861-3636 September 14, 1988 Clifford Bressler c/o Mr. Jim Clements P. O. Box 81495 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Re: Old Pesticide Storage Area on Property located East of Calloway Road and North of the Hageman Extension in Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr. Bessler: On May 2, 1988, a representative of the Kern County Health Department along with two representatives of the Kern County AG Commissioner's Office, made a complaint inspection of a small section of land once known as "3ean Labourde Farms" on Calloway Road in Bakersfield, California north of the Hageman Road Extension. The following violation of the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30 and Section 25189.5a of the California Health and Safety Code were observed during the inspection. 1. Evidence of discharge of hazardous mate~*ial on the ground at the site. A section of the property approximately 20' X 15' enclosed by a chain link fence on 3 sides, was stained and had a pesticide type odor. The caged area was once used as a pesticide storage area. Approximately 1482 pesticide containers were taken from this site. The inspection noted two water wells, two water Puddles littered with trash, several buildings and the old pesticide storage area. You as a responsible party must provide this department with a site characterization proposal for the site described, within 30 days. The department's outline for such proposals is enclosed and may be utilized as a guide in preparing your proposal. Clifford Bressler September 14, 1988 Page 2 Approval must be obtained from the Kern County Health Department before implementing the activities described in the proposal. Please feel free to call me at (805) 861-3636, if you .have any questions. Sincere/y, ~' , Environmental Health Division AG/dr 008-88