The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUST-REPORT 5/8/2003 May 8, 2003 7-11 Bob DeNinno P.O. Box 711 Dallas, Texas 75221-0711 CERTIFIED MAll, RE: Failure to Complete SB 989 Secondary Containment Repairs & Retest at the following locations in Bakersfield, CA: 7-11, 1701 Pacheco Rd., 7-11, 4647 Wilson Rd., 7-11. 9600 Brimhall Rd., 7-11, 3601 Stockdale, 7-11, 4101 :~ ":~: Calloway, 7-11,525 W. Columbus. O.l lS.R TiVE2,o, '.' S, ..,SERVICES FINAL REMINDER NOTI CE Bakerslleld. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)3954349 Dear Underground Storage Tank Owner & Operator: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 *H' Slreot Since January 1, 2003, this office has sent you monthly reminders B,kerstield. G^ 0.3301 advising you of a failed SB 989 test. In that letter, this office also VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 requested an update with regard to repairs of your system. PREVENTION SERVICES ,,,~,s~,~,.~,~,,.,..~,~s~,,n~. This office further explained that repairs of your system are a 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield. CA 93,301 condition of your permit to operate. Please be advised that you must voice (661) 320-3979 have your system repaired and retested by June 15, 2003. Failure to FAX (661) 326-0576 comply may result in further enforcement action up to, and including PUaUC EDUC^TIO. revocation of your permit to operate. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3696 This office has extended every courtesy with regard to sending FAX (661) 326-0576 contractor information as well as one on one visit's FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 661-326- Bakersfield, CA 93301 voice (ssi) 32~-3~5~ 3190. FAX (661) 32043576 TRAINING DIVISION Sincerely, 5042 V~ctor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93,308 VOICE (661)3994697 Ralph E. Huey FAX (661) 399-5763 Director of Prevention Services by: ,/ Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Aisc complete A. Signat~e item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired .... [ /j/ , J ,/~ gq Agent · Print your name and address on the reverse ~)~(,/'~/.?/.,/~/.,~)~ [] Addres~e ~ that we can return the ~rd to you. B. R~by(~t~N~e) ' ~C. D~of~el~e~ B AEach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. I~el~ew add~ ~emm ~m ~em 17 ~ Yes .1. ~cle Addre~ed to: ~ YE~, enter delive~ address below: ~ No '. ' .':~.~"~"~'~: ;~"~';~':~'~: ~:~ BOB DEN~NO ' "::,':,'", .... DALLAS TEXAS 75221 0711 D ~fl~ U~l D ~pm~ Mail D Regi~emd ~ Ream R~ipt for Mer~di~ .... ~ I~ured Mail ~ C.O.D. 7002 3150 0004 9985 3~37 m .... ' :'::"' ............ ~' ~ " :"~ '"'"~" ' "' "~ ' ~:' ~ Ream R~ept F~ Here Re~ Dei~e~ Fee (Endor~ment R~uired) ~ T=eo= BOBDEN~NO mmm~,ro ,- 7-11 =~ POBOX711 California Regional Water'Quality trol Board C on Central Valley Region Winston H. Hickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary.tbr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 24 May 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000852 Mr. Bob DeNinno 7-Eleven, Inc. 3130 South Owyhee Street Boise, Idaho 83705 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, 7-ELEVEN//16834, 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted First Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Sampling Report (First Quarter Report) dated 29 April 2002 and prepared by IT Corporation, Concord (IT). The First Quarter Report describes a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 7 February 2002. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue and that you conduct the additional site investigation and soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test we approved. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, 1,2-dichloroethane, ethylene dibromide, and total lead should be included during the next monitoring event. Summaries of the project and the First Quarter Report, and our comments follow. Project Summary The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mile southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west- southwest of two canals. Groundwater was encountered in soil borings at approximately 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) during a site-assessment investigation conducted on 31 July and 1 August 2000. Methyl tertiary butyl ether may have been released into site soils and groundwater from a faulty union joint near the turbine sump of the midgrade unleaded UST discovered during an October 1999 tightness test and subsequently repaired. A detailed Project Summary is provided in our letter dated 18 March 2002. Fourth Quarter Report Summary IT conducted the Fourth Quarter 2001 groundwater monitoring event on 7 February 2002. Depth to groundwater in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 ranged from 18.24 to 18.92 feet below the top of the casings. IT calculated the direction of groundwater flow to be toward the south and the gradient to be approximately 0.009 feet per foot, which is consistent with historical monitoring data. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Bob DeNinno - 2 - 24 May 2002 The Groundwater Gauging Form included in the First Quarter Report indicates that groundwater samples were collected without purging. The Purge Sheet indicates that one set of temperature, electric conductivity, pH, and dissolved oxygen measurements were taken using a field instrument. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020, and methyl tertiary butyl ether, tertiary butyl alcohol, di- isopropyl ether, ethyl tertiary butyl ether, tertiary amyl methyl ether, 1,2-dichloroethane, and ethylene dibromide (MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB) by EPA Method 8260B. TPH-g and MTBE were detected in the sample collected from MW-3, the downgradient well, at 160 and 580 gg/L, respectively. Xylenes were detected at 0.51 gg/L in the sample collected from MW-1. Analytes were not detected in samples collected from MW-2. MTBE detected in MW-3 has decreased from 2,600 and 3,900 gg/L during the last two quarterly monitoring events. Comments Based on review of the above-summarized report; we have the following comments: MTBE detected in downgradient monitoring well MW-3 has decreased from 2,600 and 3,900 p~g/L during the 25 September and 14 November 2001 monitoring events, respectively, to 580 gg/L during the 7 February 2002 event. The MTBE may have been released into subsurface soils and groundwater from a known leak at a turbine sump product piping union joint (subsequently repaired) or from a vapor system release at the dispenser islands. Previous'soil sampling has been limited to the perimeter of the UST system. By our letter dated 7 December 2001, we requested additional site assessment and monitoring well installation, and that the feasibility of soil remediation by SVE be evaluated. We requested installation of one dual-purpose SVE/groundwater monitoring well, one downgradient monitoring well, and performance of a 3- to 5-day pilot test. We also indicated that upon review of the pilot test results, Regional Board staff would request submission of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) evaluating remedial alternatives, including "no action." On 1 May 2002, we verbally approved IT's Addendum to February 4, 2002 Soil Vapor Extraction Test Workplan dated 29 April 2002. We understand that IT will conduct si_te asse_ssme~nt._a.n.d _mg:~n!t?_r_in__g_w._e_!! instal_l.a_t!0n- du_ri~g late_. _M_ay 2002. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the First Quarter 2002 monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260B, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA Method 8260B, and total lead. Please submit the Second Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Sampling Report by 18 July 2002. By our letters dated 26 March, 19 July, and 7 December 2001, and 18 March 2002, we requested that groundwater samples be analyzed for 1,2-DCA, EDB, and total lead. These analyses were only performed during the Third Quarter 2001 event. Please conduct these analyses during the next quarterly monitoring event. We request that these analyses to verify that 1,2-DCA, EDB, and total lead are not chemicals of concern. U:\UGTODW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 GW 5-02.doc ~/lr. Bob DeNinno - 3 - 24 May 2002 By our letters dated 26 March and 19 July 2001, we requested that you analyze groundwater samples for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two non-consecutive quarterly monitoring events (six months apart). You performed these analyses during the Third Quarter 2001, and were to again perform them during the First Quarter 2002. However, analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN were apparently not performed during the First Quarter 2002 event. Regional Board Staff utilizes this data to determine site closure requirements and as an indicator of natural attenuation. During the next monitoring event, analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN should be performed on samples collected from at least one upgradient and two downgradient monitoring wells. According to the First Quarter Report, groundwater samples were collected without purging and one set of temperature, conductivity, pH, and dissolved oxygen measurements were collected. "No purge" sampling should not be conducted without our approval. We will approve "no purge sampling" for this site provided you conduct an initial "demonstration" sampling event which generates analytical data comparing "no purge" and traditional (purge) sampling techniques. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter, we have not received the required electronic data submittals for your site. Please have your consultant contact this office at least five days in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. John D. Whiting Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure Mr. Howard Wines 111, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosurb,-/ Mr. Ed Simonis, IT Corporation, Sacramento, w/enclosure Ms. Shelby Lathrop, IT Corporation, Concord, w/enclosure U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 GW 5-02.doc California Regional Water Quality Con-l ol Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair ton II. IIickox Gray ]3avis 'ecretaryfor Sacramento Main Office Governor ~vironrnental Internet Address: http:/Iwww.swrcb.¢a.gov/r,,vqcb5 Protection 3443 Routier Road, Suite A, Sacramento, California 95827-3003 :.:'.. Phone (916) 255-3000 · FAX (916) 255-3015 9 November 2001 Underground Storage Tank Owners and Operators ~- Other Interested Parties REQUIRED ELECTRONIC DELIVERABLE FORMAT FOR LABORATORY AND SITE DATA SUBMITTALS TO REGULATING AGENCIES Effective 1 January 2001, Assembly Bill 2886 added Sections 13195 - 13198 to the California Water Code requiring that the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Bo&d) develop emergency regulations for underground storage tanks (LIST). These new regulations (Californi& Code of Regulations, Title 23, Chapter 16, ArtiCle 12; Sections 2729 and 2729.1) specify that Underground Tank Owners and/or Operators (individually or collectively the Responsible Party) or their agent submit analytical data electronically via the Internet to the Regulating Agencies, using formats designated by the State Water Board that are both non-proprietary and available as public domain. To meet these objectives the State Water Board designated the Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF) developed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. EDF enables laboratories and consultants to produc, e data in a standardized format that can be transmitted electronically to the Responsible Party .and Regulating Agencies. For more information about the EDF process you may log-on to the State Water Board Web site at ..http:/&eotracker.swrcb.ca.~ov and then click on the information link to AB 2886. All EDF data must be submitted over the tntemet to the State Water Board Geographic Environmental Information Management System database (GeoTracker). Developed under the direction of State Water Board staff, GeoTracker is a robust database that allows for storage of interrelated site data including the above electronic data submittals. Regulating Agencies review the data submitted for final acceptance into GeoTracker. Since t September 2001, analytical laboratories have been required to submit electronic data using EDF for their analyses of soil and/or groundwater samples, These submittals, in addition to tee customary paper format, are for all UST sites (including both the preventive and investigative/cleanup components of the UST program). After 1 January 2002, in addition to the laboratory data, site specific information is required to be submitted electronically for the following: 1) the latitude and longitude of ground water monitoring wells (including any other well or permanent sampling point designated as part of the site monitoring program) accurate to within one meter; 2) the surveyed elevation, relative to mean sea level, for any ground water sampled, accurate to within a tenth of a foot; 3) groundwater information, including depth California Environmental _Protection Agency Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce ener~ consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at ht,:p://www.swrcb.ca, gov/r,~qcb5 EDF Reporting - 2 - 9 November 2001 to water, free product presence/thickness and well status; and, 4) a ske map in electronic format showing property boundaries, buildings, and soil and water sampling locations. PASSWORD: To initiate the EDF in OeoTracker, the Responsible Party is required to obtain a password by logging-on to the State Water Board Web.site at htto://=eotracker.swrFb.ca.gov and then clicking on the info~mation link to AB 2886. The password is used by the Responsible Pa ,~,. (or their agent) to upload the required analytical data into the OeoTracker database. ASSISTANCE: If you, as a Responsible Party, require assistance to obtain or use a password (or to submit data and maps electronically), you may have an agent assist you (e.g. an environmental consultant, engineer, attorney, etc.), or call the GeoTracker help-desk (1-800-506-9118). 'Also, for . detailed information regarding the regulatory requirements or to find a State Water Board staff contact, the Responsible Party (or designated agent) may log-on to the AB 2886 information link on the OeoTracker Web site listed above. For eligible sites, the California Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund will cover the additional costs incurred by claimants for compliance with these regulations, to the extent that these costs are reasonable and necessary (e.g.: as required by the Regulating Agencies to assure adequate investigation or cleanup of a contmninated site). If you have any questions, please contact your County or Local Implementing Agency, Certified Unified' Program Agency (CUPA) or Regional Board representative. For counties in the Central Valley Regional Board juri~{'ction, please call the local off, ce in Fresno at (559) 445-5116, Redding at (530) 224-4845yacramento at (9 t 6) 255-32 ! 2. Under~ound Tank Program Manager Cen.t.~al Valley Region MRY 08 2003 ?:19 BKSFLD FIRE PREVEMTIOM (661)852-2172 p.2 Permit No. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD -'~e~L_~- ~3~/~(~ OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (661) 326-3979 PERMIT .aPPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT/MODIFY UNDERGROUND STORAGE T~NK ~E OF ~P~CATION (CHECK) [ ]N~W FAC[LI~ [ ]MOD~ICATION OF FACIL~ [ ]NEWTANK INSTALLATION AT EXISTINO FACILITY ~AR~NGDATE ~o ~ , PRCPOS~COMP~TIONDATE ~ o~ , FACIL~ NAME ~ ADD~SS~/~/ ~. ~1~ ~ 7ti Ct~ ~ZeaO~ ff~ ZIP ~DE~~ CO~~attt~? ~Ott}~t$]~] ~ee$ ~ C~ LICENSE NO.~ n~D~ssqot~ ~oSg~// ~ ................ c~o~l~a ~9~ Z~CODE~ WO~A~ COM~ NO. WATER TO FAQ~ITY ~H TO GRO~D WA~R SOIL ~P~ ~PE~ED AT SITE / NO. OF T~ TO B~ ~TA~ED ~E~ FOR M~OR FUEL ~.YES, ,NO SPILL PR~V~ION ~ROL AND CO~ MEAS~ P~N O~ F]~ Y~ NO S~T1ON FOR MOTOR FUEL TANKNO. VOLUME UNLADED REGU~R P~IUM D]~EL AVIATION z. SECTION FOR NON MOTOR FUI~.L STORAGE TANKS TANK NO. VOLUME CHEMICAL STORED CAS NO. CHEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED (NO BRAND NAME) (IF KNOWN) FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY {APPLICATION DATE FACILITY NO. NO. OF TANKS FE~S $ THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND '~ILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF TH[S P'£1LIV[IT AND ANY OTHER fi'TAT'E, LC)CA_ AND FEDERAL REOUL,ATIONS. THIS FO~ HAS BEEN COM?LE'I~D UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TIZUE .~D C om.r,~d , - APPR~¥£D ' BY: -- APPLICANT NA{['IE (PRINT) - APPLICANT SI~]~qATURE/ xms ~,~mnrms szco,~ms n 1,~x~ wm~ March 12, 2003 Bob Deninno ?-11 P.O. Box 711 Dallas, Texas 95221-071 ! CERTIFIED MAIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION & SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE RE: Failure to Perform/Submit Annual Maintenance on Leak Detection FIRE CHIEF RON ~R~ZE System at 7-1 l, 525 West Columbus, 7-11, 4101 Calloway, 7-11, 9600 Brimhall in Bakersfield, CA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Business Owner: VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Our records indicate that your annual maintenance certification on your leak SUPPRESSION SERVICES detection system was past duc on February 19, 2003 (525 West Columbus) and 2101 'H' Street February 20, 2003 (4101 Calloway & 9600 Brimhall). Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 You are currently in violation of Section 2641(J) of the California Code of Regulations. PREVENTION SERVICES FIRE SAFETY SERVICES · ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. "Equipment and devices used to monitor underground storage tanks shall be Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 installed, calibrated, operated and maintained in accordance with FAX (661) 326-0576 manufacturer's instructions, including routine maintenance and service checks at least once per calendar year for operability and running condition." PUBLIC EDUCATION 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 You are hereby notified that you have thirty (30) days, April 12, 2003 to either VOICE (661)326-3696 perform or submit your annual certification to this office. Failure to comply FAX (661) 326-0576 will result in revocation of your permit to operate your underground storage FIRE INVESTIGATION system. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3951 Should you have any questions, please feeI free to contact me at 661-326-3190. FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION Sincerely, 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Ralph Huey VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Director of Prevention Services Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc ' ~ Postage $ ru Certified Fee ~ I Postmark , i--I Return Reciept Fee I Here , I--I (E~dorsement Required) { r"l Restricted Delivery Fee ~ (Endorsement Required) ! ,njTo~.os. BOB DENINNO '~ru ~ 7-11 ~ r~~ [ S~nt ro POBOX711 .... ~;~':~'~:'~ DALL r,- [o~,o'~x'~ AS TEXAS 95221 0711 .---1 January 29, 2003 Mr. Steve Underwood Bakersfield Fi~e Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: 7-Eleven #16834, 525 Columbus, Bakersfield Secondary Containment Repairs Dear Mr, UndePNood: 7-Eleven is in receipt of your memo dated January 13, 2003. 7-Eleven has contracted with MIT Engineering to make the necessary repairs to the components that failed the Secondary Containment Testing. MIT Engineering is preparing permit applications for submittal in early February. Once repairs are complete, the system will be tested by 7- Eleven's testing contractor, Tanknology, Inc. 7-Eleven hopes this Information satisfies the Agency's request. Please feel free to me at (208) 429-8466 should you have any questions. 7-Eleven, Inc Market Manager Judy Soper Jason Ward Jesse Kirk (MIT) £nvit'omcnml 5e~}.ccS Depaz'Cltl¢llt / 10220 5. ~. Greenb~ ~ad / 5ai~ 470 I Po~xd, Ot~o~ 972z~ Phonc (505) 977-7715 1 ~ (505) 245-3458 · Complete items 1; 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signatpre item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. [] Agent ~· Print your name and address on the reverse [] Addressee SO that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpie.,~,e, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 17 [] Yes 1. Article Addressed to: if YES, enter delivery address below: [] No BHASHI K~kMBoj 7 ELEVEN' 525 WEST COLUMBus { 3. Service Type BAKERSFIELD [] Certified Mail [] Express Mail ~. _ CA 93301 .... ----- - - - __ ~ [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. ........ 4. Restricted Deliver? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2 7002 2410 0002 1974 9589 PSForm 3811, Postage $ ILl Certified Fee Im Retum Reclept Fee H~re (Endorsement Required) tl'J Restricted Delivery Fee .. (Endorsement Required) To,a~ F BHASH! KA~BOJ '~i,~-~£-~ 525 WEST COLUMBUS ........ orPO'B( BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 '~T&;'~: ........ / UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS :~*~*- Permit No. G-10 · Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box · DA~(ERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONI~ENTAL SERVICES '~ 7~ 5 Ch~.~sr Avenue, Su~ ~0 ~ak~m~ield, CA ~1 Certified Mail Provides: ~69 ~'~'~'96~o ~ · A mailing receipt (~s~,~eU) ~00a eunr~l~l~ ~oa Sd · A unique identifier for your mailpiece · A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: . , · Certified Mail may ONLY be comoineo with First-Class Mail® or Priority Maile · Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. · NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consid .pr~nsured~or Registered Mail. · For an additional fee, a Return Receil~tmay be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Retum Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee.. Endome mailpiece "Retum Receipt Requ.ested". To _receive a fee.waiver for a ouplic.ate return receipt, a USPSe postmark on your uertified Mail receipt is reqmreo. · For an additional fee, dellvery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted~elivery". · If.a postmark on the Ce. rtified Mail receipt Is desired, please pre_sent .the arti,; cm at the post off[ce ;or postmarking. If a postmark on the uertifled Mai~ receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present It when making an Inquiry. Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail addressed to APOs and FPOs. March 1, 2003 Bhashi Kamboj 7-Eleven 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, CA 93301 CERTIFIED MAIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION & SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE FIRE CHIEF aON FROZE RE: Failure to Perform/Submit Annual Maintenance on Leak Detection System at the Above Stated Address. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Business Owner: VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Our records indicate that your annual maintenance certification on your leak detection system was past due on February 19, 2003. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 YOU are currently in violation of Section 2641(J) of the California Code of VOICE (601) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Regulations. PREVENTION SERVICES "Equipment and devices used to monitor underground storage tanks shall be FIRE SAFETY SERVICES* ENVIRONMENTAL SER~ICE$ 1715 ChesterAve. installed, calibrated, operated and maintained in accordance with Bakersfield, CA 93301 manufacturer's instructions, including routine maintenance and service checks VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 at least once per calendar year for operability and running condition." PUBLIC EDUCATION You are hereby notified that you have thirty (30) days, April 1, 2003 to either 1715 Chester Av~. Bakersfield, CA 93301 perfOrlTl or submit your annual certification to this office. Failure to comply VOICE (661) 326-3696 will result in revocation of your permit to operate your underground storage FAX (661) 326-0576 system. FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. · Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3190. Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 Sincerely, TRAINING DIVISION Ralph Huey 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Director of Prevention Services VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Aisc complete A. Signature item4 Jf Restricted Del!very is desired. I ~-.., . _ ..47---~. 0 0L~ I-I Agent · Print your name and address on the reverse ~ X~ r-I Addressee So that we can return the card to you, · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, . B. _Rect~ived by (Print~3'~Vame) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. ~' '~--// ' D. Is delive~J address different from item 17 [] Yes 1. Article Addressed to: if YES, enter delivery address below: [] No i DONITA COGDILL i 7 ELEVEN '4101 CALLOWAY '3. Service Type ; BAKERSFIELD CA 93312 ~ [] Certified Mail [] Express Mail ..... [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail' [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7002 2410 0002 1974 9572 PS Form 3811, August ~, Po~ge ? Certified Fee [ 123 L il:=l _ Postma,-k [ r-'lReturn Reciept Fee / (Endorsement Required) / Here Restricted Delivery Fee | 'n DONITA COGDILL 7 ELEVEN ~4101 CALLOWAY .............. [' BAKERSFIELD CA 93312 ' USPS I I Peru!it No. G-10 ~ · Sender: Pleaso print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box s BAKERSFIELD 'FIRE DEPARTMENT OFF~CE OF ENV~RO,~,:~ ~AL S~RV~CES 1715 Chester Av~n~, Suit~ ~,0 II,h,,,il, ' " ,,lhh.h,.l ' Certified Mail Provides: a A mailing receipt (e~a~e~) ~00~ eunp ~o~.~ a A unique identifier for your mailple~ a A record of delive~ kept by the Postal Sewice for ~o yearn Impo~ant Reminders: a Codified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Maile or Priori~ Mails a Ce~ified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. aNO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Ce~ified Mail. For valuables, please ~nsider Insured or Registered Mail. a For an additional fee a Return Receiptmay be requested toprovide proof of deliver. To obtain R~urn Recei~ se~me, p[ea~ ~mplete ~ aaach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the a~icle and add applicable postage to ~ver the fee. E~dorse mailpie~ "Return Re~ipt Requested". To [ecei~e a fee.w~ver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPSe postmark on your ~e~iried Mai~ receipt reqmmo. m For an additional fee, delive~ may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "RestrictedOefive~ m If a postmark on the Codified Mail receipt is desired, please present the a~i- cie at the post office for postmarking, If a postmark on the Codified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry, Internet access 1o delivery information is not available on mail addressed to AP0s and FP0s, March 1, 2003 Donita Cogdili 7-Eleven 4101 Cailoway Bakersfield, CA 93312 CERTIFIED MAIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION & SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE RE: Failure to Perform/Submit Annual Maintenance on Leak Detection FIRE CHIEF F~ON FRAZE System at the Above Stated Address. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Dear Business Owner: 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Our records indicate that your annual maintenance certification on your leak FAX (C~1) 395-1349 detection system was past due on February 20, 2003. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street You are currently in violation of Section 2641(J) of the California Code of Bakersfield, CA 93301 "~ · ,,Oe"uta';ons. VOICE (661) 326-394"1 FAX (661) 395-1349 "Equipment and devices used to monitor underground storage tanks shall be " PREVENTION SERVICES installed, calibrated, operated and maintained in accordance with FIRE SAFEW SERVICES · ENVIRONMF. NTN. SERYICE$ 1715 ChestorAve. manufacturer's instructions, including routine maintenance and service checks Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 at least once per calendar year for operability and running condition." FAX (661) 326-0576 You are hereby notified that you have thirty (30) days, April 1, 2003 to either PUBLIC EDUCATION perform or submit your annual certification to this office. Failure to comply 1715 Chester Av~. Bakersfield, CA 93301 will result in revocation of your permit to operate your underground storage VOICE (661) 326-3696 system. FAX (661) 326-0576 FIRE INVESTIGATION Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3190. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 o~ncere~y, FAX (661) 326-0576 Ralph Huey TRAINING mWSlOn Director of Prevention Services 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 oyl"": FAX (661) 399-5763 ~. ~ Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc ELEVEn January 29,2003 Mr. Steve Underwood Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: 7-EleVen #16834, 525'Columbus, Bakersfiel Secondary Containment Repairs Dear Mr. Underwood: 7-Eleven is in receipt of your memo dated January 13, 2003. 7-Eleven has contracted with MIT Engineering to make the necessary repairs to the components that failed the Secondary Containment Testing. MIT Engineering is preparing permit applications for submittal in early February. Once repairs are complete, the system will be tested by 7- Eleven's testing contractor, Tanknology, Inc. 7-Eleven hopes this information satisfies the Agency's request. Please feel free to c..~ me at (208) 429-8466 should you have any questions. 7-Eleven, Inc Market Manager Judy Soper Jason Ward Jesse Kirk (MIT) Enviromental Services Department 10220 S. W. Greenburg Road / Suite 470 / Portland, Oregon 97223 Phone (503) 977-7713 / Fax (503) 245-3438 ..g~ t~ $~\ State of Water Resources Control Board ! . Division of Clean Water Programs ' ' ~ ~'~ ...... P.O. Box 944212 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 (Instructions on reverse side) ~:~.:~'~"~;:~.7:h'~:~.~:~377 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERCROUND STORAGE TANKS CONTAINING PETROLEUM A. I am required to demonstrate Financial Responsibility in the Required amounts as specified in Section 2807, Chapter 18, Div. 3, Title 23, CCR: [~] 500,000 dollars per occurrence [-"] I million dollars annual aggregate or AND or [~ ! million dollars per occurrence . ['-'] 2 million dollars annual aggregate B. 7-Eleven, ~nc. ' hereby certifies that it i~ in compliance with the requirements of Section 2807, (Name of Tank Owner or Operator) Article 3, Chapter 18, Division 3, Title 23, Catlfomia Code of Regulations. The mechanisms used to demonstrate financial responsibility as required by Section 2807 are as follows: American International $1,000,000 per Specialty Lines PLS Occurrence & Annual Yes Yes Insurance Insurance Company 2674022 $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate ,, Note: If you are using the State Fund as any part of your demonstration of financial responsibility, your execution and submission of this certification also certifies that you are in compliance w/th ali conditions for part/c/pat/on in the. Fund. D. Facility Name Facility Address 7-Eleven #16329 1701 Pacheco Rd., Bakersfield, CA Facility Name Facility Address 7-Eleven #16549 4647 Wilson Rd., Bakersfield, CA Facility Name Facility Address 7-1::1 #16634 525 W. Golumbus St., Bakersfield, GA (_.9[ 1 ~2~. Bob DeNinno, Fnvironmental Manager Bi. re of Witness or Nota~ t t / Date Name o~Witness or Notary CFR (Revised 04~95) FILE: Original - L( ~al Agency Copies - Facility/Site(s) CER'[',,,IFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 7-Eleven, Inc. (formerly known as The Southland Corporation) hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the underground storage tank ("US'I'") financial responsibility requirements of Subpart H of 40 CFR Part 280 and applicable requirements under State law. The financial assurance mechanism used to demonstrate financial responsibility is third party insurance, more particularly described as follOws: Storage Tank Third Party Liability Corrective Action and Cleanup Policy No. PLS6191639, issued by American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company effective from November 24, 2001 to November 24, 2004, pursuant to 40 CFR §280.97, providin§ coverage for underground storage tanks with respect to the taking of corrective action and/or compensating of third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases. The limits of liability are those "per occurrence" and "annual aggregate" limits specified by 40 CFR §280.93 and/or applicable State law. This Certification supercedes all previous such Certifications issued with respect to financial responsibility for UST's owned or operated by 7-Eleven, Inc. or its predecessor The Southland Corporation. To the extent required by applicable law, Certificates of Insurance have been filed with appropriate State authorities. 7-ELEVEN, INC. By: ~ Name: Edward J. Herman Title:Date: Assis~l~e~~ STATE Of TEXAS 6 i COUNTY Of DALLAS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE MEthis ~-~~ of,~~-.~,,,~Z-c, 2001. Notary Public In ~i'd For Said County and State _ My Commission Expires: :... · Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete ~ item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X · Print your name and address on the reverse · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ter derive ad,.d es 7-11 525 COLUMBUS 3. Service Type [] Certified Mail [] Express Mail BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise · - ............ [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7002 0860 0000 1641 5684 PS Form 381 1, Augus Domestic Return Recei 102595-02-M-0835 OFF 'L" USE r"l Postage$ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee Postmark (Endorsement Required] Here ~={3 Restricted Delivery Fee I--'l~.~dorsernent Required) '525 COLUMBus :BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 Permit No. G:10 ] · Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box · BAKERSF~,ELD FIRE DEPAR~.~ENT OFFICE OF ENVIRO;~M~?~'TAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 3.30 C~'..;crsfieJd, CA (~3301 January 13, 2003 7-11 525 Columbus Bakersfield CA 93301 FIRE CHIEF F~ON FF~ZE Certified Mail ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 RE: Recent SB 989 Secondary Containment Testing FAX (661) 395-1349 suPPRESS,O. SERV,CES REMINDER NOTICE 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 · VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Dear Owner/Operator: PREVENTION SERVICES F~s,~,~.~,.~.,~.o.~..,,~, Our records indicate that you completed your secondary containment 1715 ChesterAvo. testing on September 9, 2002. Our records further show a failed test. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3979 Therefore you are required to have your system repaired and re-tested F^X (eel) 320-o576 as soon as possible. PUBLIC EDUCATION 1715 Chester^v~. This office requests an update with regard to repairs of your system. Bakersfield, CA 93301 vOiCE (561)326-3696 Please be advised that repairs involving the replacing of components FAX (661) 326-0576 must be under permit from this office. The repairs of your system are FIRE INVESTI~TIO. a condition of your permit to operate. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 vO,CE (564)3~0-3951 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661- FAX (6~1) 326-0576 326-3190. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Sincerely, Bakersfield, CA 93308 ~ ~ VOICE (661) 399-4697 ~ FAX (661) 399-5763 " Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Winston It. Itickox Robert Schneider, Chair Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www,swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 20 August 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000852 Mr. Bob DeNinno 7-Eleven, Inc. 3130 South Owyhee Street Boise, Idaho 83705 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, 7-ELEVEN #16834, 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Report On Additional Site Assessment And Vapor Extraction/Vent Test (Report) dated 19 July 2001 and prepared by your consultant, Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc., Concord (Shaw). The report documents additional assessment of soil and groundwater and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test. We requested the work by our letter dated 7 December 2001. The Report suggests that a small mass of petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates is present. We do not request remediation by SVE. We request that you perform at least two additional quarters of groundwater monitoring prior to our consideration of site closure. Summaries of the project, the Report, and our comments follow. Project Summary The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasoline underground Storage tanks (USTs) and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mile southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west- southwest of two canals-. Groundwater was encountered in soil borings at approximately 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) during a site assessment investigation conducted on 31 July and 1 August 2000. Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) may have been released into site soils and groundwater from a faulty union joint near the turbine sump of the midgrade unleaded UST discovered during an October 1999 tigtxtness test and subsequently repaired. A detailed Project Summary is provided in our letter dated 18 March 2002. Report Summary Shaw installed groundwater monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 on 23 May 2002.' Monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 were screened from 10 to 23 feet and 10 to 25 feet, respectively. MW-4 is a standard-construction 2-inch diameter monitoring well. MW-5 is a 0.75-inch diameter direct-push California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swreb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Bob DeNinno 2 20 AuguSt 200.~2_ monitoring well. MW-4 was installed in a downgradient position in an alley near San Dimas Street. MW-5 was installed between the dispenser islands and the underground storage tank (UST) cluster. Soil samples were collected from the monitoring Well borings at 5-foot intervals beginning at 10 feet bsg. Soils encountered during the investigation were logged by Shaw as fine- to coarse-grained sand and silty sand, grading to coarse sand and medium- to coarse-grained gravelly sand. Soil samples collected from depths of 20 and 25 feet bsg in MW-4 and 15, 20, and 25 feet in MW-5 were analyzed in the laboratory for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 801 SM, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 802 lB, and volatile organic compounds, including the fuel oxygenates MTBE, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME) by EPA Method 8260B. Analytes were not detected in the soil samples. An SVE pilot test was conducted from 11 to 12 June and 18 June 2002. Monitoring well MW-3 was used as the extraction well. Monito_ri_ng wells MW-~I_, ~MW~2, MW-4,. an__d_MW-5 w_e_~r~e_use_d_as_ observation points. The applied vacuum on MW-3 ranged from 30 to 40 inches of water (in. water). The flow rate in MW-3 increased from 115 to 162 cubic feet per minute (cfm). Vacuum response greater than or equal to 0.10 in. water was measured in all the observation points at distances ranging from 40 to 85 feet from MW-3. Influent volatile organic vapor concentrations measured in the field with a flame ionization detector (FID) ranged from 10 to 20 parts per million by volume (ppmv) during the first day of the test and decreased to below detectable concentrations on the last day of the test. Three influent vapor samples were collected for laboratory analysis on the last day of the test. The samples were analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M and BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020. Analytes were not detected in the samples. Shaw concluded that the VET pilot test results indicate a minimal impact to the subsurface soils by petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates, consistent with previous site investigation. Shaw will request that no further corrective action be conducted at the site if MTBE concentrations detected in MW-3 decrease during the next two quarterly groundwater monitoring events and are not detected in other monitoring wells. Report Comments Based on review of the above-summarized report, we have the following comments: Based on the results of the site assessment and SVE pilot test summarized in the Report, only a small mass of petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenate appears to be present in site soils. These findings are consistent with previous site assessment data. The source of contamination appears to have been a faulty union joint near the turbine sump. of the midgrade unleaded UST discovered during an October 1999 tightness test and subsequently repaired. Additional sampling of monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5 should confirm whether the dispenser islands are an additional point of release. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue. Groundwater samples collected during the First Quarter 2002 monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260B, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and ethylene dibromide (EDB) by EPA Method 8260B, and dissolved lead. By our letter dated 24 May 2002, we requested that you submit the Second Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Sampling Report (Second U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVET 8-02.doc Mr.~...,Bob DeNinno 3 20 August 2002 ?- Quarter Report) by 18 July 2002. As of the date of this letter, we have not received the Second Quarter Report. By our letters dated 26 March, 19 July, and 7 December 2001, and 18 March 2002, we requested that groundwater samples be analyzed for 1,2-DCA, EDB, and dissolved lead. These analyses were only performed during the Third Quarter 2001 event. We requested these analyses to verify that 1,2-DCA, EDB, and lead are not chemicals of concern. Samples collected for dissolved lead should be filtered in the field. Field filtration should be noted on field purging/sampling l°gs. By our letters dated 26 March and 19 July 2001, and 24 May 2002, we requested that you analyze groundwater samples for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two non- consecutive quarterly monitoring events (six months apart) on samples collected from at least one upgradient and two downgradient monitoring wells. You performed these analyses during the Third Quarter.200_l, and_were to again perfor__m the_m dur_ing_[he First_ Quarter 2002. Howev__er, analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN were not performed during the First Quarter 2002 event. Regional Board Staff utilizes this data to determine site closure requirements and as an indicator of natural attenuation. These analyses should have been performed during the Second Quarter 2002. If these analyses were not performed during the Second Quarter 2002, they should be performed during the Third Quarter 2002. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Formatj~br Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format For Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosurex~ Mr. Ed Simonis, Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc., Sacramento, w/enclosure Ms. Shelby Lathrop, Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc., Concord, w/enclosure U:\UGTxJDW_files\2002 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVET 8-02.doc . Co ntrolBoard California Regional Water Quahty Central Valley Region Winston H. Hickox Robert Schneider, Chair - Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 15 May 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000852 Mr. Bob DeNinno 7-Eleven, Inc. 3130 S. Owyhee Street - Boi~-~,-Idah6 83705 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, 7-ELEVEN t/16834, 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Addendum to February 4, 2002 Soil Vapor Extraction Test Workplan (Addendum) dated 29 April 2002 and prepared by IT Corporation, Concord (IT). The Addendum proposes the installation and sampling.of one direct-push soil boring between the dispenser canopy and underground storage tanks (USTs), utilizing an existing monitoring well for multi-day soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot testing, and the installation of one downgradient monitoring well. We did not approve Soil Vent Test Workplan (Work Plan) dated 4 February 2002 and prepared by IT. By our letter dated 18 March 2002, we requested that you submit the Addendum. We approve the revised scope of work proposed in the Addendum. Summaries of the project and the Addendum, and our comments follow. Project Summary The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mile southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west-southwest of two canals. Groundwater was encountered in soil borings at approximately 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) during a site,assessment investigation conducted on 31 July and 1 August 2000. A detailed project summary is provided in our letter dated 18 March 2002. Addendum Summary IT proposes to drill one direct-push soil boring to a depth of 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) between the USTs and the dispenser island canopy. Soil and groundwater samples will be collected from the boring. IT will also install one standard-construction 2-inch diameter monitoring well screened from 10 to 25 feet bgs in a downgradient position near the southwest corner of the facility building using hollow- stem auger technology. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Bob DeNinno - 2 - 15 May .2~ .2 ~ Soil samples will be collected from the direct-push and monitoring well borings at 5-foot intervals. Selected samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8021B, and MTBE, tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), di-isopropyl ether (D2E), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) by EPA Method 8260B. The groundwater sample collected from the direct-push boring will be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8021B, and MTBE, TAME, ETBE, DIPE, and TBA by EPA Method 8260B. IT will conduct an SVE pilot test of up to four days duration, depending on data collected during the first day of testing and Regional Board requirements. IT will contact Regional Board personnel during the pilot test to propose changes warranted by field conditions. Comments Based on review of the above~s-u~mm----~ized report, ~i'~-~ i15~-f611~i~g co~-~t~ We approve the installation and collection of soil and groundwater samples from the direct-push boring in the area between the dispenser canopy and USTs. IT indicated during a telephone conversation on 29 April 2002 that sampling of the direct-push boring, in conjunction with continued quarterly sampling of MW-2, should be sufficient to determine whether the dispensers are a source of release. By our letter dated 18 March 2002, we had requested investigation of the dispensers by installation of one dual- purpose SVE/monitoring well. We would prefer the installation and sampling of a dedicated monitoring well or a soil investigation beneath the dispensers, but we will defer to IT's judgment. The full vertical extent of impacted soils should be considered defined when two consecutive soil samples lacking field evidence of contamination have been collected. We approve the installation and quarterly sampling of the proposed downgradient monitoring well. The well should 'be added to the existing quarterly monitoring network. By our letters dated 7 December 2001 and 18 March 2002, we requested that the feasibility of soil remediation by SVE be determined through the installation of one dual-purpose SVE and groundwater monitoring well and performance of a 3- to 5-day pilot test. We also indicated that upon review of the pilot test results, Regional Board staff would request submission of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) ~9-~l~fi~g-r~-~e~di~-altErn ~fiV~scin-~ l~di~gg "n-o~a~c ti~-. ' '~ =UVo n ~a~ddition-al~revi-ewTwe- approve-the proposed use of monitoring well MW-3 as the vacuum well and MW-1 and MW-2 as the observation wells, as proposed in the Work Plan. We reiterate our previous request that pilot test duration be from 3 to 5 days. Influent vapor samples should be collected at the beginning of the pilot test, at least once per day during the test and at the end of the test. The samples should be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8021B, and MTBE, ETBE, TAME, DIPE, and TBA by EPA Method 8260B. Please submit a report of findings for the investigation, monitoring well installation, and SVE pilot test by 23 July 2002. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to U:\UGTODW_files\2002 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE-GWadde d 5-02.doc ~,Mr.~ob DeNinno 3 15 May 2002 Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter we have not received the required electronic data submittals. Your consultant should contact this office at least five days in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. D. Whiting Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format f?r_~Labor, atory.~a~d. Site Dat_q Jubmittals ...... · cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure --.~ Mr. Howard Wines III, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure'''° Mr. Ed Simonis, IT Corporation, Sacramento, w/enclosure Ms. Shelby Lathrop, IT Corporation, Concord, w/enclosure U:\UGTxJDW_files\2002 CmTespondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE-GWadde d 5-02.doc California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretaryfi~r Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 18 March 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000852 Mr. Bob DeNinno 7-Eleven, Inc ........ 10220 S. W. Greenburg AvenUe, Suite 470 Portland, Oregon 977223 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, 7-ELEVEN #16834, 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Fourth Quarter 2001 Monitoring and Sampling Report (Fourth Quarter Report) dated 17 December 2001 and Soil Vent Test Workplan, 7-Eleven Store No.. 16834 (Work Plan) dated 4 February 2002. Your consultant, 1T Corporation, Concord (IT), prepared the reports. The Fourth Quarter Report describes a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 14 November 2001. The Work Plan proposes procedures for conducting a soil vapor extraction pilot test (VET). We requested that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue by our letter dated 19 July 2001. We requested that a work plan for installation of one dual-purpose soil vapor extraction (SVE) and groundwater monitoring well and a 3- to 5-day pilot test be submitted by our letter dated 7 December 2001. The Work Plan does not propose the installation of a dual-purpose SVE and groundwater monitoring well and a 3- to 5-day VET. We do not approve the Work Plan. We request that a revised work plan be submitted. We also request that you submit a work plan for installation of at least one additional downgradient groundwater monitoring well. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue. Summaries of the project, the Fourth Quarter Report, and the Work Plan and our comments follow. Summary of the project The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasOline underground storage tanks (USTs) and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mile southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west- southwest of two canals. Groundwater was encountered in soil borings at approximately 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) during a site assessment investigation conducted on 31 July and 1 August 2000. Soils encountered during that investigation are summarized as fine- to coarse-grained sands, silty sands and 'gravel. Based on documents in City of Bakersfield Fire DePartment (CBFD) case files, a faulty union joint near the turbine sump of the midgrade unleaded UST was discovered during the October 1999 tightness test. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrch.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Bob DeNinno - 2 - 18 March 2002 A release to the UST pit fill was noted by field observation. Banks and Company, Fresno replaced the faulty union and the product piping subsequently passed the tightness test, In .a letter dated 1 February 2000, the CBFD directed that further assessment of the extent of impacted soils associated with the release be conducted. Six soil borings were advanced around the perimeter of the UST system to a maximum depth of 30 feet bgs by IT on 31 July and 1 August 2000. The work plan originally proposed drilling six borings to a depth of 40 feet bgs and conversion of these borings to monitoring wells. Monitoring wells were not installed by IT because the presence of hydrocarbons was not noted in the soil borings based on field observations. Twenty soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) byEPA Method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and the fuel oxygenate methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8020. The soil samples were also analyzed for the fuel ......... 6xyg~ates t~fti~9)-b-htyl-alc6h61 (TBA);-1VlTBETdi-i~6~i:opyl'~th~t (DIPE), ~tl~yl t~iary-bt~tyl-ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), 1,2- dibromomethane (EDB), ethanol and methanol by EPA Method 8260. Analytes were not detected in the soil samples with the exception of ethylbenzene, which was detected in one sample at a concentration of 0.0063 milligrams per kilogram (rog/kg, parts per million). Grab groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring using disposable bailers. Groundwater samples were analyzed for the same analytes using the same methods as the soil samples. TBA was detected in b, oring B-I, east of the USTs, at 330 micrograms per liter (gg/L, parts per billion). MTBE was detected in boring B-3, south of the USTs, at 11 [tg/L. Other analytes were not detected. IT conducted an investigation to identify water wells within one mile of the site. No water wells were identified within 2,500 feet of the site. Groundwater flow direction was interpreted to be toward the south to southeast. IT Corporation requested site closure based on the repair of the release source, nondetect or low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents and absence of nearby water supply wells. The CBFD referred the site to the Regional Board in a letter dated 28 November 2000. In a letter dated 18 December 2000, Board staff requested that a work plan addendum to define petroleum hydrocarbon i-mpacts to groundwater be-submitted.- IT- submitted-Workplan For Further Subsurface-Investigation -- (work plan) dated 1 February 2001 and prepared by IT. Board staff conditionally approved the work plan by our letter dated 26 March 2001. The work plan proposed the installation and sampling of three groundwater monitoring wells in positions near borings B-l, B-3 and west of B-2 and analysis of selected soil samples from the monitoring well borings. IT installed groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 on 3 to 4 May 2001. Monitoring well MW-1 was screened from 10 to 25 feet bgs, while MW-2 and MV~-3 were screened from 10 to 30 feet bgs. Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3 were installed near borings B-1 and B-3. Monitoring well MW~2 was installed northwest of MW-3, near San Dimas Street. Soil samples were collected from the borings at 5-foot intervals from 5 feet bgs to maximum boring' . depth. Soils encountered during the investigation were logged by IT as predominantly fine- to medium- grained sand and silty sand, grading to coarse sand and medium- to coarse-grained gravelly sand below 20 feet bgs. Four soil samples collected from depths of 20 and 25 feet bgs were analyzed in the U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE- GW 3-02.doc Mr. Bob DeNinno 3 18 March 2002 laboratory for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8021B, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, and TAME by EPA Method 8260B. Analytes were not detected in the soil samples. The Second Quarter 2001 (initial) groundwater monitoring event was conducted by IT on 24 May 2001. Depth to groundwater ranged from 16.51 to 17.16 feet below the top of the casings (below TOC). IT calculated groundwater flow direction to be toward the southwest at a gradient of 0.01 feet per foot. Samples collected from the monitoring wells were analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8021B, 1,2-DCA, EDB, MTBE, TBA, DIPE,'ETBE and TAME by EPA Method 8260B. Analytes were not detected with the exception'of MTBE, which was detected at 1.9 gg/L in.the sample collected from MW-3. The Third Quarter 2001 groundwater monitoring event was conducted by IT on 25 September 2001. IT calculated groundwater flow direction to be toward the southwest a.t a gradient 9f 0.007 feet per foot. TPH-g was detected 'at Concentrations of 81, 64, and 540 gg/L in samples collected from MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3, respectively. MTBE was detected in the sample collected from MW-3 at 2,600 gg/L. MTBE was detected at 1.9 gg/L in the sample collected from MW-3 during the (initial) 24 May 2001 monitoring event. Summary of the Fourth Quarter Report IT conducted the Fourth Quarter 2001 groundwater monitoring event on 14 November 2001. Depth to groundwater in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 ranged from 17.8.8 to 18.42 feet below TOC. IT calculated the direction of groundwater flow to be toward the south-southwest at a slope of 0.007 feet per foot. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 were analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2- DCA, and EDB by EPA Method 8260B. TPH-g was detected in the sample collected from MW-3 at 1,200 gg/L. MTBE was detected in the sample collected from MW-3 at 3,900 gg/L. Analytes were not detected in samples collected from MW-1 and MW-2. Summary of the Work Plan ; . IT proposes to utilize exi'sting monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 to conduct the VET. Monitoring well MW-1 is screened from 10 to 25 feet bgs. MW-2 and MW-3 are screened from 10 to 30 feet bgs. Depth-to-groundwater was measured during the Fourth Quarter 2001 monitoring event at approximately 18 feet bgs. Moderate to high airflow rates are expected dub to the presence of highly permeable (sandy) soils below approximately 5 feet bgs. During the VET, a vacuum will be applied to MW-3 using a thermal oxidizer rated at 250 cubic feet per minute (cfm). The duration of the VET is expected to be 24- hours. MW-1 and MW-2 will be utilized as vacuum observation points. Extracted soil vapor will be sampled prior to destruction in the thermal oxidizer unit. Samples will be analyzed in the field using a flame ionization detector (FID) and in the laboratory. Samples will be analyzed in the laboratory for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, and TAME by EPA Method 8260. U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE- GW 3-02.doc Mr. Bob DeNinno - 4 - 18 March 2002 Three levels .of vacut~m will be applied during the VET. A different vacuum will be applied to MW-3 during each test phase and continued until steady-state flow is measured. Extraction flow rates, vapor concentrations, and observation welt vacuum readings will be obtained during each test phase. VET test data will be used to evaluate the feasibility of SVE, to estimate the mass of extractable hydrocarbons, radius of vacuum influence (ROI), and expected duration of SVE operation. The ROI is expected to be at least 40 feet. The existing site-specific Health and Safety plan will be utilize~l. A report of findings for the VET will be submitted within 4 to 6 weeks of completion of fieldwork. Comments to the Fourth Quarter Report and Work Plan Based on review' of the ab6xTe~-summa~i~ed rep6f/, w~ h~e th~ f611'ow'ing comm~ntg: MTBE detected in downgradient monitoring well MW-3 has increased from 1'.9 gg/L during the initial 24 May 2001 monitoring event to 2,600 and 3,900 gg/L during the 25 September and 14 November 2001 monitoring events, respectively. The MTBE may have been released into subsurface soils and groundwater from a known leak at a turbine sump product piping union joint (subsequently repaired) or from a vapor system release at the dispenser islands. However, previous.soil sampling has been limited to the perimeter of the UST system and the source of the release that has impacted groundwater is unknown. By our letter dated 7 December 2001 .we requested that the feasibility of soil remediation by SVE be determined through the installation of one dual-purpose SVE and groundwater monitoring well and performance of a 3- to 5-day pilot test. We also indicated that upon review of the pilot test results, Regional Board staff would request submission of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) evaluating remedial alternatives, including "no action." We had intended that the dual-purpose well would be installed in the center of the UST system between the USTs and dispensers (upgradient of the USTs). We had hoped that soil, groundwater and SVE pilot test vapor samples from the dual-purpose well would also clarify the source of the groundwater impact. Admittedly, a variety of sampling plans could be devised to meet these objectives, but IT's proposed VET does not. IT indicates that the VET test data will be used to evaluate the feasibility of SVE, to estimate the mass of extractable hydrocarbons, ROI, and expected duration of SVE operation. We concur with IT that the ROI may be determined in a VET of 24 hours or less duration. However, based on the short duration of the proposed VET it may be difficult to estimate the mass of extractable hydrocarbons and expected duration of SVE operation. We do not approve the Work Plan. We reiterate our request that you submit a work plan for the installation of one centrally located dual-purpose SVE and groundwater monitoring well and the performance of a 3- to 5-day VET. The dual purpose well should be installed between the USTs and the fuel dispenser canopy. Soil samples collected from the dual-purpose well boring should be submitted for laboratory analysis. The dual purpose well should be added to the groundwater monitoring network. Alternatives to a centrally-located dual-purpose well will be considered; however, any alternative must clarify the source of the release and have the potential to effectively remediate the site. Please submit the 'revised work plan by 22 April 2002. U:\UGT~JDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE- GW 3-02,doc Mr. Bob DeNinno - 5 - 18 March 2002 The concentration of MTBE in detected in downgradient monitoring well MW-3 continues to increase and the lateral extent of impacted groundwater has not been defined. We request that you submit a brief work plan for installation and sampling of at least one additional downgradient monitoring well. 'Please' submit the work plan by 22 April 2002. Quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue at the site. Groundwater samples collected during the First Quarter 2002 monitoring event should be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260B, and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA Method 8260B. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, total Kj~ldahl nitrogen, and total lead should be included for samples collected from at least one upgradient and two downgradient monitoring wells during the 'next monitoring event. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground .Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. We remind you that continued failure to comply with our requests will result in enforcement action and may jeopardize your access to the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund. Please have your consultant contact this office at least five days in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. John D. Whiting Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure Mr. Howard Wines III, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure,/ Ms. Shelby Lathrop, IT Corporation, Concord, w/enclosure U:\UGT'dDW_files\2002 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 SVE- GW 3-02.doc D' · November 4, 2003 Mr. Ken Hilliard The Southland Corporation P.O. Box 711 Dallas, TX 75221-711 .I.ECH~EF CLOSURE Of 3 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RON FRAZE STORAGE TANK(S) LOCATED AT 525 W. COLUMBUS STREET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BAKERSFIELD, CA 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield,CA 93301 PERMIT # BR 031 1 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Hilliard: 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3941 This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the FAX (661)395-1349 results for the preliminary assessment associated with the closure PREVENTION SERVICES of the tanks located at the above stated address. FIRE SAFET~ SERVlCES* ENVIRONMENTAL SER1/lCES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA93301 Based upon laboratory data submitted, this office is satisfied VOICE 1661) 326-3979 FAX(661)326-0576 with the assessment performed and requires no further action at this time. Accordingly, no unauthorized release reporting is PU.UC EDUCATIO. necessary for this closure. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 9.3.301 VOICE (661)326-3696 FAX (661) 326-O576 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (661) 326-3979. FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 blncerely, VOICE (661)326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0578 TRAINING DIVISION ' 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA93308 Howard H. Wines, III VOICE (661) 399-4697 Hazardous Materials SPecialist FAX (661) 399-5763 Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services HHW/dlc cc: J. Whiting, RWQCB J. Auchterlonie, SECOR www. secor, com INTERNATIONAL 3017 Kilgore Road, Suite 100 IN(~ORPORATED Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 916-861-0400 TEL 916-861-0430 FAX January 27, 2004 Mr. John Noonan California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region - Fresno Branch 1685 E Street Fresno, CA 93706-2020 RE: Well Destruction Report 7-Eleven Store #16834 525 West Columbus Avenue Bakersfield, CA SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.03.0512 Dear Mr. Noonan: This report is prepared by SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc. to document the destruction of five groundwater monitoring wells located at 525 West Columbus Avenue in Bakerfield, California (Figures 1 and 2). The report has been prepared in response to a California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) letter dated January 14, 2003, requesting that the site-related groundwater monitoring wells be destroyed as part of the final closure requirement (Attachment A). Well Destruction Permitting/Utility Clearance - SECOR obtained well destruction permits from the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) (Attachment A). Prior to conducting subsurface work at the site, Underground Service Alert (USA) was contacted to delineate subsurface piping near the site with surface markings. In addition, a private utility Iocator service was contracted to clear each well location. Health and Safety - SECOR modified our existing site-specific Health and Safety Plan for the scope of work as required by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) Standard "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response" guidelines (29 CFR 1910.120). The document was reviewed and signed by all SECOR personnel and subcontractors performing work at the site. Well Destruction - On October 30, 2003, SECOR supervised the destruction of five groundwater monitoring wells located at the subject site by West Hazmat Drilling. The wells were destroyed by pressure grouting each well from total depth to five feet below ground surface (bgs), then removing the well box and concrete apron. Wells MW-1 and MW-4 were pressure-grouted from 30 feet bgs to five feet bgs, and wells MW-2 and MW-3 were pressure-grouted from 25 feet bgs to five feet bgs (Table 1). Well MW-5 was pressure-grouted from 23 feet bgs to five feet bgs. After each well box and concrete apron was removed, the upper five feet of each boring was filled with neat cement grout and capped with either concrete or asphalt to match existing grade. The well boxes and concrete aprons were temporarily stored in a 55-gallon drum onsite. Copies of the field notes summarizing well destruction activities are provided in Attachment B. 16834 Well Destruction Report.doc SECOR 7-Eleven Store #16834 Well Destruction Report January 27, 2004 Page 2 Waste Disposal No soil cuttings were generated during well destruction. Debris generated during wellbox removal was temporarily stored onsite in a 55-gallon drum. Belshire Environmental hauled the destruction debris to Philadelphia Recycling (A-l) in Mira Loma, CA. Conclusions On October 30, 2003, SECOR oversaw the destruction of five onsite monitoring wells. Soil cuttings and debris generated from well destruction were disposed of offsite. Based on compliance with the RWQCB's closure requirements, and on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc., SECOR requests formal closure of the site. Sincerely, SECOR International Incorporated Jaff Auchterlonie Senior Geologist bpc Attachments: Attachment A- Regulatory Correspondence and Permits Attachment B - Field Notes cc: File, 7-Eleven, Inc. Ms. Jane Warren, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Mr. Howard Wines, Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 16834 Well Destruction Report. doc SECOR Intemational Incorporated ,, ! ~ SECOR FIGURES ~-~.~ .~.. ~ .~:~ .... ,':t~ . i ~.:I · ': ,.'~-.~. ........... .- '_.'._.', ...... ~ ~i~,. ~ ~~.~ .? s~-".~ ~,,~lJ . c.' ~'~ I t ~ ' .... '~ " :: ~'--." ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ,~ ,t ' I ' ~ ", L,..' ~ '~-'~ ~ ;:~".~".:'" :; ~~:, '~, I .~:.~ ...._.....~ .. ,, , REFERENCE: DELORME TOPOQUAD, CAHFORNIA SOUTH REGION o I I SC~ IN D~ F~ILI~ NO. 1 S E C 0 R IODE~0~ ~RSFI~D,C~IFORN~ JOB ~o.77EL ~4.23.0521 SITE LOCATION M~ LEGEND: ~ DESTROYED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL (~) SOIL BORING LOCATION · ~ FUEL DISPENSER Z~ SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY - ~ CANOPY BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK I-. ASPHALT ., FACILrrY \\ ,- -[~. MW 4 0 40 80 APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET ~ PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOI~ b REFERENCE: THIS FIGURE IS BASED ON A "srrE PLAN" DRAWN BY: CBD /~' PROVIDED BY SHAW E & I, INC., DATED I CHECKED: SG IllJ'~ 1 7-ELEVEN, INC. OCOTBER 2002, AND IS INTENDED FOR1~ ~A FIGURE 2 I' ILLUSTRATION ONLY. APPROVED: JSA CILITY NO.16834 DATE: 10DEC2002 ' ' ~ .,os,o.: 7,EL.~66~.23.052~ $ E C O R ~2~ COLUMBUSS'rRE~ S,TE~'~ 3017 KILGORE ROAD, SUITE 100 V~/EST '~ CAD FILE: WO BOXES BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA :~ RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 ! SECOR TABLES Table 1 Soil Boring and Well Construction Details 7-Eleven Site No. 16834 525 West Columbus Avenue Bakersfield, California Well/ .~ screen Screen~ ,'. · Well Drill . DePth Diameter 'ToP = . BOttom 'Length ·' comments' I,D. Date (feet bgs) (inches) · (feet ~bgs) ' .(feet bgsi =-.(feet) MW-1 05/03/01 25 2 10 25 15 Destroyed 10/30/03 MW-2. 05/03/01 30 2 10 30 20 Destroyed 10/30/03 MW-3 05/03/01 30 2 10 30 20 Destroyed 10/30/03 MW-4 05/23/02 25 2 10 25 15 Destroyed 10/30/03 MW-5 05/23/02 23 3/4 10 23 13 Destroyed 10/30/03 B-1 7/31/2000 30 7 ...... confirmation soil boring B-2 7/31/2000 30 7 ...... confirmation soil boring B-3 7/31/2000 25 7 ...... confirmation soil boring B-4 7/31/2000 25 7 ...... confirmation soil boring B-5 7/31/2000 25 7 ...... confirmation soil boring B-6 08/01/00 25 7 ...... confirmation soil boring Explanation All wells are of PVC construction bgs = Below ground surface 16834 WELL BORING SUM.xls Page I of I · ! SECOR ATTACHMENT A REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE AND PERMITS Well Destruction Report 7-Eleven #16834 525 West Columbus Avenue Bakersfield, CA SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.03.0512 ~01/20/02 10:05 FAX 8006 7118 SECOR SLC ~002/004 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Char Winston IL Hickox , .... Gray Davis $¢cretno' fnr ~"tef~lO Bl'9~lCh O~ce Oovernor gnv~ronrntntal hmn~ Add~: hnp'Jlww~,$w~b.cagovl-rwqcb$ Pro~cfOJn 1685 E 5tmeL F~mo. California 93706-2020 Phong (559) 445-5116 - 1AX (559) ~5.5910 14 January 2003 RWQCB Case No. 5T16000852 Mx. Bob DeNinno ,R EC £ iVE D 7-Eleven Envixoamental Services Department. JhN i 6 10220 S. W. O~nb~g Ro~, Suim 470 Environment! Semites PonI~d, ~gon 97223 CASE C~SU~- U~ERGROUND STOOGE T~K ~I.~ASE, 7-E~N STO~ NO. 16834, 525 ~S T COLUMBUS A ~NUE, BA ~FIE~, ~RN CO UN~ T~s Ie~ c~nfi~s the completion of a site ~vesfig~on ~d co~ve ~tion for ~ ~ouad storage ~s fo~rly l~ated at the above-~sc~bed lo~tion. ~ you for yo~ coo~r~on t~u~out ~is Evesfigation. Yo~ wiHin~ess ~d prompmess ~ responding w o~ inquiries conceding ~ former ~der~und stooge ~s ~ ~afly appreciate. Bas~ on thc i~o~on ~ ~e abovc-mt~mnced file ~d wi~ ~e provision ~a~ ~e ~fo~on provided to t~s a~ency w~ accuram ~d rcpmsen~tivc of site condi~ons, ~s a~ncy fm~ ~at ~e site inves~ation ~d co~c~ve ac~on c~icd out at your undcr~o~d stor~c ~s site is ~ ~mph~ce with ~c requirements of sub~visio~ (a) ~d ~) of S~on 25296.10 of ~e He~th ~d S~e~y Code ~d with co~ecfive action m~l~o~ ~opted p~u~t to Secdon 25299.3 of ~ He~ ~d S~ety Co~ ~d ~ no ~er ac~on related to ~e ~leum mle~e ~ ~= site is ~u~. A su~ of ~e info~ation ~ ~e above-mfema~d ~e is inclu~d ~ ~e C~e Closure Su~. a copy of w~ch is enclosed. ~s nofi~ is issuM p~u~ m subdi~sion (g) of Sec~on 25296.10 of ~e He~ ~d S~e~ Code. Ple~e conm~ ~. 1ohn M. Noon~ m our o~ce if you have ~y questions reg~g ~s matter. Su~g Enter R~ No. 24105 Enclosure cc: Mr. Tim Fillmore, Kings Count7 Division of Environmcnta! Health Services, Hartford, w/enclosure Ms. Barbara Rempel, UST Cleanup Fund, Szcramen£o, w/enclosure Californ~ ~,nvironme~ntal Protection Agency G .tl~t:yckd Paper The energy challmgc facing California is teal. E~a3~ C~]Jfomi~n ned;ds to take immedtat~ action to reduce ~et'l~ co~umption. For a list of simpl~ ways you can nd-cc demand and cut your energy costs, sc~ o0r Web-~i~ a/http://www..nv,rcb,ca.gov/rwqcb5 '01/20/03 10:06 FAX 80J [6 7118 SECOR SLC ~]003/004 California Regional Water Quality Control Board' Central Valley Region ~imon H. Itickox ,,, , Robert Schmider, Chair Secretary/or __ Gray DavL$ ~a~vironmental ~ Branch Office Governor Protection lummeA )skiing: h up,JAvww.~ wm:b.ea.go v/rv~lc5$ 1685 E $~, Fmm~. California 93706-2020 Phone (559.1445.5I 16 * FAX'[5$9) 445-5910 TO: JOHN M. NOONAN FROM: IOHN D. WHITING Senior WRC Engineer Engineering Geologist SUBJECT: CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK .RELEASE, 7-ELEVEN STORE NO. 16834, 525 WEST COLUIV~US AVENUE, BAIO~RSFIIgLD, I~.RN COUNTY Background Information The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasoline undarground storage ranks (USTs) and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mile southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west- southwest of two unlined canals. A faulty joist near the turbine of the midgrad¢ unleaded gasoline UST was discovered during an October 1999 tighmess test e. nd was subsequently repaired_ Gasoline was discovered in the tank fill material. The Bakersfield Fire Department (BFD) requested investigation to determine the extent of the release. IT Corporation (IT) drilled and sampled six soft borings during July and August 2000. Soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene. xylenes and the fuel oxygenate methyl ten-butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE). The soil samples were also analyzed for the fuel oxygenates tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert- butyl ether (ETBE), terr-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2- dibmmomethane ('EDB). Analytes were not detected in the soil samples with the exception of ethylbenzene, which was detected in one sample at a concentration of 0.0063 mmlgrams per kilogram (rog/kg, pans pei million). IT concluded that impacted soils were limited to a small volume beneath the USTs. Groundwater was encountered in the borings at a depth of approximately 15 feet below ground surface Cogs). Grab groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring. Groundwater samples were analyzed for the same analytes using the same methods as the soil samples. TBA was detected in boring California Environmental Protaction Agency ~ Recyctcd Paper vT~_.c c,n..a_t~y, chall.~ng~ facing California is real. Every Californian heads m mica immediate heron to wduc~ ener consum L~on. '01/20/03 10:06 FAX 80 ~6 7118 SECOR SLC ~004/004 -- 7-Eleveu Store No. 16834 Closure Summary - 2 - 14 January 2003 B-l, east of the USTs, at 330 micrograms per liter (p.g/L, parts per billion). MTBE was detected in boring B-3, south of the USTs, at 11 The BIrD referred the case to our agency for oversight by.a letter dated 28 November 2000. We requested the installation and quarterly sampling of at least three groundwater monitoring wells. The monitoring wells were installed during May 2001. TPH-g, BT]EX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DGA and EDB were not cletected in soil samples collected from the monitoring well borings. Additional monitoring wells were inktalled downgradient of the site and near thc dispenser islands. during May 2002. Analytes were also not detected in soil samples collected from these borings. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test was conducted during June and July 2002 using the monitoring wells. Influent volatile organic vapor was measured in the field using a flame ionization detector (FID) at 20 p .arts per.. million by volume (ppmv) or less. TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE were not detected by l'~bo~tory anal~is in uhree influent samples. 1T concluded that the small residual mass of gasoline beneath the USTs was removed during the pilot test. 1T conducted seven groundwater monitoring events from 25 May 2001 to 19 November 2002. TPH-g was detected in monitoring well MW-3 during five events at concentrations from 120 to 1,200 gg/L and was detected in ff,vo 6ther wells a£ concentrations less than 100 g~dL during the second monitoring event. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzcne, xylencs, TBA, D]PE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB were not detected during the monitoring history. MTBE w~ detected in MW-3 by EPA Method 8260 during thc first five monitoring events. MTBE concentrations from 1.9 to 3,900 g~dL were detected. The highcs~ MTBE conc.~nuarion was detected during the 14 November 2001 event. MTBE was not detected iu MW~, the downgradient well, or in MW-5, near the dispenser islands Conclusions I conclude that a total volume of soils containing residual MTBE less than 50 cubic yards may have resulted from the release. SVE pilot testiug indicates that little MTBE remains in the soil. Domestic water is supplied to the site by City of Bakersfield municipal water system. Water supply wells or other sensitive receptors were not identified in the site vicinity. Site land use is not anticipated to change in the future. As no evidence of a large mass of impacted soils has been discovered, residual contaminants appear unlikely to significantly impact human health and the environment, extractable hydrocarbons appear tn have been removed from the site, and water supply wells were not found in the vicinity; I recommend ttiat a standard underground tank site closure letter be mailed to the responsible parties. I also recormuend that the monitoring wslls be destroyed in accordance with City of Bakersfield, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department, and California Department of Water Resources r~quirements. November 4. 2003 Mr. Ken Hilliard The Southland Corporation P.O. Box 71 1 Dallas, TX 75221-711 F~,~CH~E, CLOSURE OF 3 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ~C,~, STORAGE TANK(S) LOCATED AT 525 W. COLUMBUS STREET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BAKE RS FI ELD, CA 2101 "H' Street Ba~e=,s~, c^ 9~1 PERMIT # BR 0311 vo~c~ (.1) ~-3~t FAX (661) 395-1349 su...Ess,o. SERV,C[S Dear Mr. Hilliard: 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 voice (681) 325-3.1 This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the FAX (r~1)30S-1349 results for the preliminary assessment associated with the closure PREVF. hrr]oN SERVICES of the tanks located at the above stated address. 8 ~L'E~f SEI~q~Es. E,/Mqt~ucHTAL 1715 Chester Ave. Bak,rs,e~.C^,~Ol Based upon laboratory data submitted, this office is satisfied VOICE (681) =s~7~ FAX(r~1)32~7, with the assessment performed and requires no further action at this time. Accordingly, no unauthorized ralease reporting is .u.uo EDUC^~O. necessary for this closure. 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield. CA 93301 VO,CE(68,)=5-~ If yOU have any questions regarding this matter, please FAX (681) 326-0576 contact me at (661) 326-3979, FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. 8akefsfiem, C^ 93e0~ . ~lncerely, VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. B~e=,~,c^=~o. Howard H. Wines, III vOICE (~,)~ Hazardous Materials Specialist FAX (661) 399-5783 Registered Geologist No, 7239 Office of Environmental Services HHW/dlc cc: J. Whiting. RWQCB ~-'~-JT~uchtedonie, SECO~'~ i~RN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVIa DEPARTMENT ~l~lication Date: 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 3~ No. of Wells/Bor~gs: B~ERSFIELD, CA 93301 PTO No.: O ~ T( ~one: (661) 862-8700 Well No(s).: D~ Fax: (661) 862-8701 ~c~ ~ APPLICATION AND PE~IT FOR MONITO~NG WELLS This application is to: ~ Const~ct ~ Modi~ '~Destroy of~boring ~ Groundwater ~ Cathodic Protection ~ Test Hole ~ Other Type Addrcssg~ ~'~ C~.~:~..~ ~.~1T~Scc Address ~ 0 ~ O~ .P,po~ sra, date: ~.~ . .-~/ .2.~*~ . Depth to groundwater: GENEraL GO~DITIONS OF THIS PE~IT FOH GO'~STHUgTION: I. ~ell site approval is requ~ed before beginn~g any Work related to well cons~ction. It is unlaw~l to continue work past the s~ge nt which ~ inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed. 2.O~er requ~ed inspections include: conductor cming, all a~ular seals, and finnl cons~ction tea~res. 3. A phone call to ~e Dep~ment office is required on the morning of~e day that work is to commence nnd 24 hours before the placement of nny seals or plugs. 4.Cons~ction under ~ Pe~it is subject ~o ~y ins~ctions by Dep~ent representatives. 5. All wells ~n~cted of PVG located at n cont~ated site where degradation may occur must be des~oyed n~er ~o yea~ or prove no deg~dation is occu~g or has occu~ed. 6. Any misrepresen~tion or noncompli~ce with required Pe~it Conditions or Ordinnnce will result in issu~ce of n "STOP WO~ O~ER." 7. & copy of~e Dep~ent of ~ater Resources Driller's Repo~, ~ well ns copies of logs, Water quali~ nnnlyses, nnd ns-buil~ of wells must be submi~ed to ~e Environmental Health Se~ices Depa~ent within 14 days after completion of the work. ~ENE~L ~ONDIT[O~S OF THIS PEE~IT FOH DESTHU~TION: !. · A well des~ction application must be filed with ~is Depa~ent if a ~ell is being des~c = . ~.:test. hole pe~it ' ..... ~ ~ 2. De~ction procedures must be toll~'Weda~ per UT-SO. ' ' ." ,. ~ '3'~.." :-' "placement· ~f*e'seal must:b~ wimessed-by a representative ~[t~is Dep~ent~ Twen~f0 ~P~ 0 3 ~: · ': ...... .' ~ .... ~ .... ':'"~ · ....." -. ..,... . BY: THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED , WEI~. ONSTRUCTION INFORMATIO BOREHOLE DIAMETER .. CASINO--INSIDE DIAMETER CASING MATERIAL & GAUGE SCREEN MATERIAL & GAUGE TYPE OF BENTONITE PLUG & DEPTH ANNULUS SEALANT & DEPTH FILTER PACK MATERIAL & SIZE SCREEN SLOT SIZE & LENGTH SEALANT PLACEMENT METHOD LOCKING WELL CAP ..... FACILITY PLOT PLAN Provide a description of the facility to be monitored, including: location of tanks, proposed monitoring and placement, nearest street or intersection, location of nay water wells or surface water within 500- foot radius of facility; please attach. · )IE OF. INFLUENCE Information on zone of influence, such as mathematical calculations or field test data, may be required ~,,.'DOSE ZONE WELLS upon review of the application. WELL DESTRUCTION INFORMATION CA$INGMATERIAL Sc,.~, C40 ~C <c.,~ q~3 0~rC- .~;ck ~O P~/C: .~c~ SF..ALANT PLACEMENT METHOD .[3~'O££ue t4o.M~ 0,~.._~ |'~s~ Ps...~.~oc-e Hede '~-e..s&~,;na ~r'~ 8ignaturo Date Contra~or'a $1g~tur¢ Dat~ THI$ APPLICATION B~OM~8 A P~RMIT WHEN APPROVED ~86 ' (11/19101) ~ '' :' WEI~CONSTRUCTION INFORMATIO ,~LL DEPTH OROUND ELEVATION (IF KNOWN) BOREHOLE DIAMETER CASINO-INSIDE DIAMETER CASING MATERIAL & GAUGE SCREEN MATERIAL & GAUGE TYPE OF BENTONITE PLUG & DEPTH ANNULUS SEALANT & DEPTH FILTER PACK MATERIAL & SIZE SCREEN SLOT SIZE & LENGTH SEALANT PLACEMENT METHOD LOCKING WELL CAP FACILITY PLOT PLAN Provide a description of the facility to be.monitored, including: location of tanks, proposed monitoring and placement, nearest street or intersection, location of any water wells or surface water within 500- foot radius of facility; please attach. "' ~IE OF INFLUENCE Information on zone of influence, such as mathematical calculations or field test data, may be required · .~OSE ZONE WELLS upon review of the application. WELL DESTRUCTION INFORMATION ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: WELL DEPTH CASING MATERIAL SEALANT MATERIAL SEALANT PLACEMENT METHOD {P:.e.S.$ ~.e }loS6L ,,, DESCRIBE DESTRUCTION PROCEDURE: ~_~,§~ ~.Jre_. ~,r-0d~-'~lc_~ ~";-'6.~ ~c'~,.f~h ~Le. 0'J-~ '1~O ~'/. c.._ C ~'X Ct'e i have read and agree to comply with the general conditions noted. This permit must be signed by either the contractor or owner. Owner'S Signature Date Contractor's Signature Date '" Approved a : Total Fee .~ ct Paid On ~ j~ Dam ,% ~//O ~ Expi.tio. Date: ~ A~ 0/~ ~ Work Order ~ TH{8 APPMGAT{O~ BEGOME8 A PERMIT ~HE~ APPROV~D (1 l/l~101) . ! ~ SECOR ATTACHMENT B FIELD NOTES Well Destruction Report 7-Eleven #16834 525 West Columbus Avenue Bakersfield, CA SECOR Project No.: 77EL. 16834.03.0512 ' Il JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store ~"d34 JOB NUMBER: "" 77EL.16834.03.1006 II SITE ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus Avenue START DATE: Bakersfield, CA DATE PREPARED: 10/21/03 IIPREPARED FOR: Sean Co¥1e PREPARED BY: Brian Carey SITE VISITATION REPORT Name(s) ':~I~',~ i~IIJ,~Z Date:~ Did you call in? ~ No., Arrival Time~~_ "De~ime: t / Who did you call? ~'l~4~t) t/J~..,~"t~ .~ Weather Notations: (SUN~) (' CLOUDY) ~ --~ SNOW Temperature~.O - ~}r_D F DRUM INVENTORY CARBON TOTAL OPEN TOP SOIL ) EMPTY TOTAL BUNG TOP HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ONSlTE AND NOTES ' II JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store 34 JOB NUMBE 77EL.16834.03.1006 II SITE ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus Avenue START DATE: Bakersfield, CA DATE PREPARED: 10/21/03 IIPREPARED FOR: Seen Co)/le PREPARED BY: Brian Care)/ DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ON SITE AND NOTES (cont) Field Work Conducted By: ~. ~ I L~-~ Date: ~ E: 7-Eleven JOB 77EL.16834.03.1006 I[?c~ ADDRESS: 525 West.Columbus Avenue START DATE: ~/II Bakersfield, CA DATE PREPARED: 10/21/03 · ---'~ PREPARED FOR: Sean Co¥1e PREPARED BY: Brian Care), GROUNDWATER OAUOING FORM MEASURED TO TOC OR GRADE? To MW-3 MW-4 ~,~, 7_ 3 Mw-~ ?-Z-bi [lHoward Wines - 7-Eleven 16834 Compaction Test Results. PDF Paqe 1 I OBOTI~CHNICAL ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION October 27, 2003 Project No. 026-03413 ]¥1ARK TEMPLETON EXCgLL KXCAVATING P.O. Box 6176 Laguna Miguel, CA 92607 RE: Compaction Testing Fuel Tank Removal 525 West Columbus Avenue Bakersfield, California Oentlc-men, ~n accordance with your authorization, we have performed compaction testing at the above-referenced project. Tests were performed by our engineering technician. The r~ults of the tests taken within ~e tank pit trench were 90% or above thc maximum density for tests token below the upper twelve inches, and 95% or above the maximum density for tests taken within the upper twelve inches. Thc limits of our testing were defined by the contractor. This testing does not preclude the possibility that the soil or fill may be loosened by future construction activities. Results of thc tests represent the compaction at the locations where ~be tests were performed. Thc engineering evaluation of thc s~'uctural integrity of the entire backfill is beyond the scope of this work. Thc maximum depth of fill tested was five fcct. Neither continuous nor part-time 2radin~ observations were performed for this project. Our finn does not guarantee earthwork construction, nor does our work relieve the contractor of his responm~oility to conform with the approved project plans and specifications. The tables on the following pages present the results of the density tests taken at the project site. The depths cited are measured from rough grade. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do .not hesitate to contact our office at (661) 633-22O0. Respectfully submitted, Principal Engineer Testing & Inspection Division RGE No. 002051 ODWIDA.~ nad. With Teu Ofllee~ Serving The Western United States 423 ! Foster Avenue * Bakersfield CA 93308 * (661) 633-2200 ,, (888) 633-2200 * Fax: (661) 633-3930 Pro. j° Pro. Pa~e2 I. hboratory Csm~m Cur~e i~m (ASTI~ D1557) [,,So Soil Curve MaLDry Optimum Fine to Medium $ilW Sand .~M A 124.4 9.9 H. Field Density Tests · ] Test Stntion or Cnrve Test Dry Moisture Percent Percent No. LocnlJon No. .. Depth Dens~y Percent Com~mcl~on Required SeptembeF 18, 2003 Fuel Tank Removal I 5'W 10'S of Noz~he~st Corner A 4.0-5.0. 117.2 7.4 94% 90% 2 20~ 30.S of Noflhwe~t Corner A 4.0-5.0. 117.2 7.3 94% 9(P/~ 3 20.W 7~ of Nor~west Corner ' A 3.0-4.0' 115.9 ' 7.7 .93% 90% 4 8'W 28~ of Not, west Cornet A 3.0~.0. l 17.9 8.1 95% 90% 5 12NV lOS of Northeast Comer A 2.0-3.0. 111.5 8.0 90% 90% 6 12NV 25'8 of No, beast Comer A 2.0-3.0' 116.9 8.5 94% 90% 7 20.W 15~ of Not,west Comer A 1.0-2.0' ! 15.6 9.5 93% 90% 8 15~ 25~ of No~hwest Comer A 1.0-2.0' 11 i .5 9~2 90% 90% September 19, 2003 9 10~ ISq~ of Nor~we~t Comer A 0.0-1.0' 118.3 8.4 95% 95% 10 5'8 30.E of No~hwest Corner A 0.0-1.0' 119.7 9.0 96% 95% 11 20~ IOE of Northwest Corner A 0.0-1.0' 118.8 7.3 ·95% 95% 12 25"~ 2YE of Northwest Corner A 0.0-1.0. 117.7 6.2 95% 95% Krazan & Associates, Inc. 8oCf~ll Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 916-861-0400 TEL 916-861-0430 FAX October 10, 2003 Mr. Steve Underwood Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 525 West Columbus Street Bakersfield, California SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.23.0521 CRWQCB Case No.: 5T16000852 Dear Mr. Underwood: SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) has prepared this letter on behalf of 7-Eleven, Inc, to document soil sampling associated with the removal of three underground storage tanks (USTs), two product dispensers, and associated fuel lines, at the site referenced above (Figure 1). INTRODUCTION This report documents removal of the UST fueling facility from the 7-Eleven Store No. 16834 located at 525 West Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California (Figure 1). All work was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services (BFDOES). SECOR provided oversight during UST, product line, and dispenser removal activities at the facility. Excel Excavating (Excel) was subcontracted by SECOR to perform the facility removal activities. The purpose of SECOR's project involvement was to observe and document the removal of the UST and dispenser system and collect soil samples to assess subsurface conditions beneath the former USTs, dispensers, and product piping. SECOR's scope of work consisted of the following tasks: · Prepare a site-specific Health and Safety Plan; · Observe and document the removal and disposal of the UST rinsate, USTs, product piping, and dispenser islands removed from the site; · Collect soil samples beneath the USTs and dispensers under the direction of the BFDOES specialist; · Analyze soil samples collected from soil beneath the USTs, dispensers, and product piping; · Prepare a summary report documenting the UST facility removal, waste disposal, soil sampling activities, and soil sample results. SECOR UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 October 10, 2003 Page 2 SITE BACKGROUND The site is located at the intersection of West Columbus Street and San Dimas Street in a commemial/residential area of Bakersfield, California. The site is operating as a retail gasoline service station and convenience store. Three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs and associated facilities are present at the site. The site has been an environmental case since October 1999. A total of 5 soil borings and 6 groundwater monitoring wells have been drilled/installed at the site. In June of 2002, a soil vapor extraction test was conducted that indicated that there is little to no residual hydrocarbon/oxygenate mass in the vadose zone. Residual hydrocarbon/oxygenate concentrations in soil and groundwater have typically been close to or below the laboratory reporting limits. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (CRWQCB) granted case closure for the site in a letter dated January 14, 2003. UST REMOVAL ACTIVITIES Permitting and Preconstruction Meeting Site Preparation Excel obtained the permits to remove the three 10,000-gallon capacity single-walled steel gasoline USTs from the BFDOES (Attachment A). On September 11, 2003, SECOR's field geologist conducted a pre-construction site walk with the EXCEL foreman, and the 7-Eleven store manager to review the scope of work, define the work area, and address the site specific health and safety issues related to the pending UST facility removal. Dispenser, Fuel Line, and USTs Removal Prior to starting the UST removal project, personnel from SECOR and Excel reviewed and signed the Site Specific Health and Safety Plan that outline the specific site related hazards. On September 15, 2003, the dispenser island and associated product lines were exposed prior to soil sample collection, and the dispenser canopy was removed. Following sample collection the dispenser island and fuel lines were removed and the trenches backfilled and compacted with engineered fill. Product lines were composed of single-walled steel and no visual indication of holes or cracks were observed. Mr. Howard H. Wines III, Hazardous Materials Specialist with the BFDOES, observed the collection of the soil samples underlying the dispenser islands and fuel lines. On September 17, 2003, the tanks were thoroughly rinsed and evacuated to remove any petroleum residue remaining in the tanks. Approximately 450 gallons of rinsate water, generated during the tank cleaning operation, was transported under Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest as Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste Liquid to Crosby & Overton, Long Beach, California for proper disposal (Attachment B). On September 17, 2003, Excel exposed and inerted the USTs with dry ice. After confirmation by BFDOES that the three USTs were properly inerted, Excel removed the USTs from the excavation for inspection. All three USTs appeared to be in good condition, with no apparent holes or cracks visually observed. The USTs were disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Golden State Metals, Inc., Bakersfield, California. The fiberglass product lines and vent lines were disposed of at the Bena Landfill in Kettleman Hills, California as part of the general debris generated during the UST removal activities. Mr. Howard H. Wines III, Hazardous Materials Specialist for the BFDOES, observed the UST removal and destruction and soil sample collection activities. File: 7-Eleven/Store 16834/Reports/16834 Tank Pull Report.doc SECOR International Incorporated SECOR UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 October 10, 2003 Page 3 Following collection of the soil samples, and with the approval of the BFDOES representative, all pea gravel was re-used to partially fill the'excavation. The tank pit was then backfilled and compacted in lifts from 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) to grade. Compaction test results completed by Krazan and Associates, Inc. will be submitted under separate cover. The entire area was paved back with asphalt. Soil Sample Collection- Dispensers and USTs On September 17, 2003, four dispenser soil samples (D~I 2', D-1 6', D-2 2', and D-2 6') were collected from beneath the former dispensers (Figure 2). The BFDOES representative did not require soil samples from beneath the product lines due to the close proximity of the dispensers and USTs. A backhoe was used to remove soil underlying the two dispensers. Soil samples were then collected directly from the backhoe bucket by driving a clean 2-inch diameter brass sleeve into the native soil. A hand auger was used to advance a boring to six feet bgs and a slide hammer equipped with a bullet sampler loaded with a clean 2-inch diameter brass sleeve was used to collect samples at 6 feet below the dispensers. Per the request of BFDOES, soil samples were collected at approximately 2 feet and 6 feet below the former dispenser locations. On September 17, 2003, a total of twelve UST confirmation soil samples were collected in native soil at the ends of the three USTs (Figure 2). Two soil samples were collected from each end of the individual USTs. T-lA through T-3A were collected at two and six feet bgs near the east end of the tanks, and T-1 B through T-3 B were collected at two and 6 feet bgs from near the west end of the tanks. A slide hammer equipped with a bullet sampler loaded with a clean 2-inch diameter brass sleeve was used to collect native samples at each end of the USTs. No soil discoloration was observed in soil within the tank pit or under the dispenser islands. No gasoline odors were noted during collection of the soil samples. All soil samples collected for chemical analysis were retained in the brass liners, labeled, and capped with Teflon sheets and plastic end caps. The samples were then sealed in zip-lock bags, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory accompanied by the appropriate chain-of-custody documentation. The soil samples collected under the USTs and dispensers were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), and the fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether (MtBE), ted-butyl alcohol (TBA), diisopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl-tert-butyl ether (EtBE), and tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME) using EPA Method 8260B, and lead using EPE Method 6010B. Copies of the Bakersfield County UST Inspection Reports are included in Attachment B. Soil Sample Analytical Results - Dispensers and USTs The soil sample results are summarized in Table 1 and presented in Figure 2. No concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, MtBE, TBA, DIPE, EtBE, or TAME were reported above laboratory detection limits in any of the soil samples collected. Lead was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.545 to 2.04 milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg) in soil samples collected from the UST cavity and from 1.9 to 3.64 mg/Kg in soil samples collected from under the dispensers. Copies of the certified analytical laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Attachment C. File: 7-Eleven/Store 16834/Reports/16834 Tank Pull Report. doc SECOR International Incorporated SECOR UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 Qctober 10, 2003 Page 4 Stockpiled Soil Handling, Sampling, and Analytical Results On September 15, 2003, EXCEL began removal of the pea gravel covering the three USTs. Based on field measurements collected onsite with a photo-ionization detector (PID), indicating that the pea gravel was clean of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and with the approval of the BFDOES representative, the pea gravel was reused as backfill material for the, now empty, UST cavity. Copies of the field notes are included in Attachment D. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND REQUEST FOR CLOSURE EXCEL successfully removed and disposed of three 10,000-gallon single walled steel USTs and associated fiberglass piping from the site. No holes or cracks were observed in the piping and UST removed from the site. The tank removal and collection of soil samples was completed under the direction of Mr. Howard H. Wines III, Hazardous Materials Specialist with the BFDOES. TPHg, BTEX, MtBE, TBA, DIPE, EtBE, and TAME were not detected above laboratory'detection limits in any of the soil samples collected from the UST cavity or under the dispenser (Table 1). The pea gravel removed from the tank pit was field screened with a PID, found to be free of petroleum hydrocarbons, and was re-used as part of the backfill material used to re-fill the UST cavity. If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please call us a(91~ Sincerely, SECOR International Incorporated Jaff Auchterlonie John E. Bower, R. Senior Geologist Principal Geologist ~ JNdh Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Site Map with Soil Sample Concentrations Table 1 - Soil Analytical Data Attachment A - UST Removal Permits Attachment B - Waste Disposal Documentation Attachment C - Certified Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Attachment D- Field Notes cc: John Wainwright, SECOR / Ken Hilliard, 7-Eleven Inc. Mr. John M. Noonan, CRWQCB - CVR Fresno Branch Mr. Tim Fillmore, Kings County Division of Environmental Health Services, Hanford File: 7-Eleven/Store 16834/Reports/16834 Tank Pull Report.doc SECOR International Incorporated SECOR ~ FIGURES . ~ I .... .::' ..... ~ .... ~ r~' m ,' - · ~ , ~,,~, ~ ~ '. ~::~::;~:~ ~ =a . ~..: ~Z~;.~ . ," I ", I ,, · t~.~.~,,-., ...... ~ - ~ ........... ~. ,,~ ~ .~¢:;~ ~ ~;~:~;:~ REFE~NCE: DELO~E TOPOQ~D, CAUFORN~ SO~ REGION ~ o ~ I I S~ IN ~ D~ P~ , FIGURE 1 ~ ~T COLUM~ S E C 0 R ~ ,o~~ ~..o. SITE LOCATION MAP LEGEND: I DEPTH B TPHg MTBE ~ GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL 2' <0.0050 < 1.0 <0.0050 (~) SOIL BORING LOCATION 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 ~ FUEL DISPENSER DEPTH B TPHg MTBE DEPTH B TPHg MTBE ~ 2' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 ~ 2' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050~ Z~ SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050~ ~PROPERTY BOUNDARY (~)B-5 · ~ CANOPY BOUNDARY IDEPTH B TPHg MTBE ~ D-2 APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF 2' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 L. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050[ ~ B BENZENE IN /Jg/L B TPHg MTBE ~ 2' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050~ TPHg TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS GASOMNE IN #g/L IDEPTH B TPHg MTBE 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050~ · MtBE METHYL-TERT-BUTYL-ETHER BY I 2' <0.0050 < 1.0 <0.0050 %CONCRETE EPA METHOD 8260 IN #g/L I 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 ~ B TPHg. MTBE ~ ASPHALT 2' <0.0050 <1.0 · <0.0050[ CHEMICALANALYT1CAL RESULTS: t-1 <o. oo5o~ ~/, ANALYTE ~ ~ 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <o. oo~o <o.o~ <o.~50 <o. oo~o -I CrJ 2' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.00501 J 1,5 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050:00:~O0~5~I yCONCENTRATION (mg/kg) . 20 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 25 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <~0050I 6' <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050I ~: < --~-'-NOT DETECTED AT OR ABOVE THE (~ ~LABORATORY REPORTING UMIT ANALYTES: 7-ELEVEN TPHg rOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS GASOMNE FACILITY B ~ 3ENZENE NO, 1 6854 MTBE ~IETHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER NAPH qAPHTHALENE MW-4 __ __ __ ~ 0 40 80 PROX, TE SC _E ~ REFERENCE: THIS FIGURE IS BASED ON A 'SITE PLAN" DRAWN BY: CBD PREPARED BY: PREPARED FO[~ -- PROVIDED BY SHAW E & I, INC., DATED CHECKED: Se 'I~r//~ 7-ELEVEN, INC. OCOTBER AND IS INTENDED FOR FIGURE 2 ILLUSTRATION2002'ONLY. APPROVED: JBA ~ F ~,ClLITY NO. 16834 DATE: 10DEC2002 . SITE MAP WITH '~ JOBNO.: 77EL.16834.23.0521 SE C O R SOIL SAMPLE CONCENTRATIONS c; 525 V IEST COLUMBUS STREET ~: CAD FILE: SITE PLAN.DWG 3017 KILGORE ROAD, SUITE 100 ~ RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 BAF ERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 ~ · SECOR TABLES Table 1 Soil Analytical Data 7-Eleven Store #16834 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, CA · ,~:Nu~mber/ ':i~!=i~D~te !i~~ Depth :,:: eenz~he~ ~TolUene benZenei: ,Xy!enes i TPHg 8260i ;' 18260 ~: 8260 ~;~8260 ~:~260 UST Tank Pull Samples T-lA2' 09/17/03 2 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.676 T-lA 6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.500 T-2A2' 09/17/03 2 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.500 T-2A6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.545 T-3A2' 09/1W03 2 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050: <0.0050 <0.0050 1.62 T-3A6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0,0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 2.04 T-lB 2' 09/17/03 2 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.811 T-lB 6' 09/17/03 6 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.786 T-2B 2' 09/17/03 2 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <1,0 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0 0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 1.31 T-2B 6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050~ <0.0050 <0.0050 1.40 T-3B 2' 09/1W03 2 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.623 T-3B 6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.556 Dispenser Samples D-1 2' 09/17/03 2 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 1.90 D-1 6' 09/17/03 6 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 3.64 D-2 2' 09/17/03 2 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 3.36 D-2 6' 09/17/03 6 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <1.0 <0.0050 <0,0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 2.28 Explanation TPHg = Total petroleum hydrations-as-gasoline mg~g = milligrams per kilograms (pads per million) (BTEX and TPHg analyzed using EPA 8260B unless noted) ft bgs = Feet below ground su~ace MtBE = Methyl-ted-butyl ether TBA = Te~-butanol DIPE = Diisopropyl ether ~BE = Ethyl-ted-bu~l ether TAME = Ted-amyl-methyl ether 7~Eleven\7-11 Stores\22468\Tables\Assessment\Tables\ 16834 tank pull soil,xls Page 1 of 1 SECOR ATTACHMENT A UST REMOVAL PERMITS UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, California SECOR Project No.: 77EL. 16834.23.0521 ?..~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD ~~-~ OF~E OF ENVIRONMENTAL S~VICES t~,n~r~i~rr 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 (661) 326-3979 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CLOSURE CERTIFICATION Page ~ of ~ I. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION BUSINESS NAME (Same as FACILITY NAME or DBA - Doing Business As) '3~i PERMIT # i !. ~- ' ""-F-"~"-T. ..... . T-T----T-~ TANK OWNER NAME 740 TANK OWNER ADDRESS 74~ TANK OWNER CITY ?42 ] STATE 743 ZIP CODE c.A :, II. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION Tank ID # ] Concentration of Flammable Vapar Concentration of Oxygen (A~ch add/~na/c~o/es of th/s page r for more ~ha. e~ee ta~.) j Top Center Bottom Top Center . Bottom 745 i 746~ 746b 74~Jc J 747a 747b I 747c TANK ^TMOSPHERE I ,I READINGS i 74a i 749a 749b 749c ~,50a ' f50b ?S0c i 751 752a 75213 ~ 75~c 753a ' Y53'b 753c On examination of the t~nk, I certt~ the t~nk is visually free from product, sludge, scale (thin, flaky residual of tank contents), rinseate and debris. I further cortifl7 that the Information provided heroin is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 81GNATU~ STATUS OR AFFILIATION OF CERTIFYING PERSON . Certifier is ~ representative.of the CUPA, authorized agency, o~ LIA: 760 ~ Yes Q No NAME OF CERTIFIER 6~,r/.0 ?54 TITLE OF CERTIFIER 755 Cit~ of Bakersfield Fire Department - Office of Environmental Services · '~-- - ~,6,~i" ~'~X:.4./l,4..-t ,~'i"' If certifier is other I;han CUPA / LIA check appropriate box below: 7~2 ADD~ESS l"1 a. Certified Industrial Hygienist (ClH) 1715 Chester Ave. 756 [] b. Certified Safety Professional (CSP) CITY VI c. Certified Marine Chemist (CMC) Bakersfield, CA 93301 757 [] d. Registered Environmental Health Specialist (REHS) PHONE n e: Professional Engineer (PE) (661) 326-3979 7~ [] f. Class II Registered Environmental Assessor /, I CERT, ,CAT,ON T, ME g. S te ,cense Board,cense con.c <wlth DATE <=~~' 7t- ~ { ~,,~, C_~ ~¢~'~ hazardous substance removal certitication) TANK PRE~IOUSLY HELD FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS ~lg~Yes []'No ?63 (If yes. the tank inte~for atmosphere shall be m-checked with a combus~ble gas indicator pSor tO work being conducted on the tenl~ ) . . ~ CERTIFIER'S TANK MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR SCRAP DEALER, DISPOSAL FACILITY, ETC: ?s4 - ! I A copy of this ceriiticate shall accompany the tank to the recycling I dispOsal facility and be provided to the CUPA,. If there is no CUPA, copies shall be submiffed to the LIA and authorized ageqcy; owner / operator of the tank system; romoval contractor; and the recycling / disposal facility. ........... q 4 ~'1 IDA I:t~ll:~llA q%rl~ ~ "}AQ d~e SECOR ATTACHMENT B WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, California SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.23.0521 Scrap Metals, Pro~ssing & R'~cycli~C~;' Contractor s '. G. S.M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGE ~"E". B~KERSFIELO; C~?~3387 " WEIOHT CERT. HO: ¢ 2000 .97 "" ~ RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJEC~ I[~ =o , ', , ,.~.~ ~ LEL READING ,' OXYGEN CONTENT ~ ~ORAP VALUE " , OTHER TOTAL · net 30 days from:" %eipt of tahk. represent~accepI ,nce of terms for payment, and confirms that tank l~movat ;omplles wltl~ s!a. te laws. --v - CCi ~R~T(~R's SIGNATURE ' ...... ~'~ERTIF~ATE OF TANK 6ESTRUCTION : ~'~ rills IS TO'~RTIFY THE RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE, ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIED ~ ~ '";~OMPLETELY 3EST~~R SC~E~Y~NG PURPLES o~LY.', ..:~..~',~ . . '~. W~TE-- Co~act~ Copy · YELLOW -- Rio Copy · PINK -- ~rma~m Copy State of California--Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved OMB No. 2050-0039 (Expires 9-30-99) See Instructions on bock ~ge 6. Department of Toxic Substances Control Please print 6r type. Form designed for use on elite (12. Sacramento, California ~ UNIFORM HAZARDOUS ~ Generator's US EPA ID No. Manifest Document No. 2.'r Page 1 Information in the shaded areas is not required by Federal law. 3:G ..... tor's N ..... d Mailing Add .... A. State Manifest Document Number SOUTHLAND CORPORATION P.O. BOX ~11 DALLAS, TEXAS 75221-0711 ~. Sta~eG .... ator'slD 5. T .... porter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number C. ·Stat T ns ~~ . D.'Transporteffs Phone(?~4) 99g-6855 Nieto and Sons Trucking, Inc. ~ p p p p tz I Iz 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ~D Number E. State Transporte/s4D [Reserved.] . I IIJllllll)l F" Trbnsportor's Ph°n~' '' 9. Designated Facili~ Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number G' Statq Eacili~'s ID ' ' DeVinne Ke~doon 'H..FacilJ~'s Phone ' 12. Containers fl 3. Tota~ 14. Unit 11. US DOT Description (including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) No. Type Quanti~ Wt/Vol I. Waste Number b. 5~a!e E EPA/Olher~ ~ T c. stale. '" ' O ~P~/Othe~ J: , Additional Descriptions~for MaferigI~-'74~~r~i~68~4":'" ;,'-'." '.' '. ',: K.::Hanal~ng COdes ~bW~stes [isted~ofe 2 . ' ." 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information NO SMOKING Alternate Disposal Site : Crosby & Overton ~4 Hour Emergency Phone Number : 714~990-6855 1630 W. 17th Street (800) ~ear Appropriate Protective Clothing bong Beach, CA 9BB13 CADB28409019 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for lranspo~by highway according to applicable international and nationa/government regulations. If I am a large quanti~ generator, I certi~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxici~ of waste generated to the degree I have'determined to be ~onomically : practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a sma[~ quanti~ generator, I have mode a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. ' ~ 7. Tra~rter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Mat. rials .,~ ~ PrintedYT~ed N~ Signat ....... / ' ~ ,/ [ Month Day Year 1 ~. Discrepancy Indication Space F A I L I 20. Facili~ Owner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. TPrinted/TypedName ~ Signature ~.Month Day year DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIs LINE. .~TSC 8022A (1/99) Yellow: GENERATOR RETAINS , *'EPA 8700--22 ' Excell ExcavaTing Inc (949) 249-22GS 09/~0/0~B ~8 5~A P.~8 ~ ~ "UNIFORM H~RDOUS ~. ~aerat~'s US EPA ID N~. Manifad ~c~t Ne. 2~ Page 1 Inf~rmalion ~n d,~ *k~ areas ~ is 3. G~rat~/~ Namt and ~iling , I 24 Hou~ Emergency Phone Number : 714-~-6~5 IG3e M. Z?th Strut taM) &27-6729 ~ We&r Appropriate Prot~tlve Clothing Loug geaoh, CA gee13 CAOe284e~19 ~rkad, and la~l~, and o~ in all ~el~t ~n ~ ~itl~ ~r ~ans~H~ highly according to appllcabla ;n~nat~ul and fla~ienoJ g~emment . a~ I~ ~vi~m~l~ OR, if I ~ e s~ll ~nti~ ge~ra~r, I h~e ~ a g~ ~i~ e~ m mlnimlle my wa~ g~Mi~ a~ sel~ th~ ~st avai~ to me an~ ~at I can 19. ~iscfepan~ Indication ,Space F ~ A C t : DO NOT ~ELOW THIS~ INE. ,. / "' OT,~2 8022A (I/991 Green: TRANSPORTF. R RETAINS EPA 8700--22 E×cell Excava?ing Inc (848) 248-22~S 09/90/03 08:S3A P.002 SECOR ATTACHMENT C CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF- CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, California SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.23.0521 ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 I ANAL YTICAL Jaff Auchterlonie SECOR International, Inc. 3017 Kilgore Road, Suite 100 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Subject' 16 Soil Samples Project Name · 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number: 77EL.16834.23 Dear Mr. Auchterlonie, Chemical analysis of the samples referenced above has been completed. Summaries of the data are contained on the following pages. Sample(s) were received under documented chain-of-custody. US EPA protocols for sample storage and preservation were followed. KiffAnalytical is certified by the State of California (# 2236). If you have any questions regarding procedures or results, please call me at 530-297-4800. Sincer.ely, 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 i ANALYTICAL LLC Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number: 77EL.16834.23 · Sample: T-lA 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-01 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 · mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TeA-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 98.1 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 100 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: /J'~)Ki~ J / ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date ' 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL/./.c Project Name' 7-£1even Store #16834 Project Number' 71EL16834.23 Sample: T-lA 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-02 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Rep. orting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units MetHod Analyzed ' Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9~20~2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9~20~2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 912012003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 912012003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9~20~2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 99.5 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 98.4 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29L/~8~0/---- ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date ' 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL ,Lc Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number: 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-2A 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-03 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) ¢ 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 98.7 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Br°mofluorobenzene (Surr) 98.9 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530_29~7~8~0 ~FF R eportNumber: 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 i ANALYTICAL Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 sample: T-2A 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-04 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 96.8 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved B~ !.~ KI 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530- 9~7~~ ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date ' 9/22/2003 · ANALYTICAL/..Lc Proiect Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-3A 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-05 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured R. eporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0,0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 103 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 95.2 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: /J'U~Ki~ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29LT-4/8(J0f ' ~~F R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL/./.c Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-3A 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-06 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed E~enzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether {ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 94.9 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 AP P roved BY: IJ'~///e~Ki~ ~/I 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4~0~, ' Date ' 912212003 ANALYTICAL/.LC Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #'16834 Proiect Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-lB 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-07 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl'iod Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 96.9 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 J~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL ProJect Name' 7-Eleven Store #'16834 Proiect Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-lB 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-08 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1,0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene ~ d8 (Surr) 101 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 97.0 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved BY: IJ'~//~Ki~ ~// 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4~)0~, ~rr R eportNumber' 35015 Date - 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL Project Name' ?-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number: ??£L.'16834.23 Sample: T-2B 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-09 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units MetHod Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether {DIPE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether {TAME) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1,0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 100 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 96.3 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved BY: /J'~_~)Ki~ ~/f 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4~0(, ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date ' 9/22/2003 Project Name' ?-Eleven Store #15834 Project Number' ??1:L.15834.23 Sample: T-2B 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-10 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl'iod Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether {ETBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tart-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 95.7 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 App roved BY: /J'~'~Ki~~'~ ~ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29LT-z~8(J0f ' ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL/.Lc Project Name: ?-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number: 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-3B 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-11 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl~od Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0,0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tart-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 95.6 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: !,~Ki~ ~ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29~7~8~0/''-- ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 912212003 I ANALYTICAL /.Lc Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: T-3B 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-12 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surf) 100 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 98.2 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29LT-~8~0f ~FF R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL/.LC Project Name' ?-Eleven Store #'16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: D-'I 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-13 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 101 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 94.7 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: ' ~ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29L7~8(~0~'' '-- Date · 9~22~2003 I ANALYTICAL u.¢ Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: D-'I $' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-14 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl'iod Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tart-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 96.8 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29L/-~0~ Date · 9/22/2003 I ANALYTICAL/./.c Pro)ect Name · ?-Eleven Store #16834 Proiect Number' ??EL.16834.23 Sample: D-2 2' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-15 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl'iod Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 101 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 · Approved By: /J'~/~Ki~ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29L/-~0 ~rr R eportNumber' 35015 Date · 9/22/2003 · ANALYTICAL/../.c Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Sample: D-2 6' Matrix: Soil Lab Number: 35015-16 Sample Date :9/17/2003 Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Metl'iod Analyzed Benzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0,0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Total Xylenes < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Diisopropyl ether (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Tert-Butanol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 TPH as Gasoline < t.0 1.0 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 Toluene- d8 (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 102 % Recovery EPA 8260B 9/22/2003 AP P roved BY: /J'~/e~Ki/fff ~/ 2795 2nd St., Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-29¥-~0~. Report Number: 35015 QC Report: Method Blank Data Date: 9/22/2003 Project Name: 7-Eleven Store #t $834 Project Number: 77EL,16834,23 Method Method Measured Reporting Analysis Date Measured Reporting Analysis Date Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Parameter Value Limit Units Method Analyzed Benzene < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethylbenzene < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Total Xylenes < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Diisopmpyl e~er (DIPE) < 0.0050 0.0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Ethyl~t-butyl ether (ETBE) < 0.0050 0,0050 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) < 0,0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Te~t-Buta~ol < 0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 TPH as Gasoline < 1.0 1.0 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Toluene - d8 (Surr) 99.0 % EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 98.3 % EPA 8260B 9/20/2003 Approved By: iJ~l~,Ki ~! KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC / [ / 2795 2nd St, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 ~/ i Report Number: 35015 QC Report: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Date ' 9/22/2003 Project Name' 7-Eleven Store #16834 Project Number' 77EL.16834.23 Dup. licate Spiked ~Dup. lic.ate Spiked Spiked -.. Sample Relative Spike Spiked ~p~Kea Sample Sample P, elative Percent Percent Spiked Sample Spike Dup. Sample Sample Analysis Date Percent Percent Percent Recov. Diff. Parameter Sample Value Level Level Value Value Units Metfiod Analyzed Recov. Recov. Diff. Limit Limit Benzene 35015-02 <0.0050 0.0396 0.0400 0.0398 0.0401 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 100 100 0.224 70-130 25 Toluene 35015-02 <0.0050 0.0396 0.0400 0.0377 0.0388 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 95.2 97.1 2.00 70-130 25 Tert-Butanol 35015-02 <0.0050 0.198 0.200 0.186 0.187 mg/Kg EPA8260B 9/20/03 94.2 93.7 0.532 70-130 25 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether35015-02 <0.0050 0.0396 0.0400 0.0333 0.0354 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 84.2 88.5 5.04 70-130 25 Approved By: KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC 2795 2nd St, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 Report Number · 35015 QC Report: Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Date · 9/22/2003 Project Name' 7-Eleven Store#16834 Project Number: 77EL.16834.23 LCS LCS Percent Spike Analysis Date Percent Recov. Parameter Level Units Method Analyzed Recov. Limit Benzene 0.0392 mg/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 90.1 70-130 Toluene 0.0392 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 91.2 70-130 Tert-Butanol 0.196 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 90.3 70-130 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether 0.0392 rog/Kg EPA 8260B 9/20/03 87.1 70-130 KIFF ANALYTICAL, LLC Approved By!~~f~? 2795 2nd St, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616 530-297-4800 ' ~ aisc~ence ~-.~.nvironmen~al i~ aboratories, Inc. September 26, 2003 Joel Kiff Kiff Analytical 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Subject: Calscience Work Order No.: 03-09-12'11 Client Reference: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Dear Client: Enclosed is an analytical report for the above-referenced project. The samples included in this report were received 9/20/2003 and analyzed in accordance with the attached chain-of-custody. Unless otherwise noted, all analytical testing was accomplished in accordance with the guidelines established in our Quality Assurance Program Manual, applicable standard operating procedures, and other related documentation. The original report of any subcontracted analysis is provided herein, and follows the standard Calscience data package. The results in this analytical report are limited to the samples tested and any reproduction thereof must be made in its entirety. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. ,/C~sc'~hce'Environmental Mich el J'Crisostomo ~' Laboratories, Inc. Quality Assurance Manager Stephen Nowak Project Manager 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 alscience .,, ANALYTICAL REPORT [~-~nvironmentai ifl~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 09/20/03 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 03-09-1211 Davis. CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 3050B Method: EPA 601 OB Project: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Page 1 of 3 Lab Sample Date Date Date Client Sample Number Number Collected Matrix Prepared Analyzed QC Batch ID I T-lA 2' 03~)9-12t1-t 09117/03 Solid 09122/03 09/23/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF qual Units Lead 0.676 0.500 I mg/kg J T-lAS' 03-09-1211-2 0S/t7/03 Solid 09=2/03 09/23/03 030922L02 Parameter Result Ri. DF Oual ,Units Lead ND 0.500 I mg/kg J T-2A2' 03-09-t211-3 09/t7/03 Solid 0~/22/02 09/23/O2 O2O0221.O2 Parameter Result RI. D._.EF Qual Units Lead ND 0.500 1 mg/kg I T-2A 03-09-121 t-4 091'17103 Solid 09122/03 09/23/03 030922L02 6' Parameter Resul[[ RI_ D._[F Qual UniLs Lead 0.545 0,500 I rog/kg I T-3A2' 03~39-t2t1~ 09/17/03 Solid 09/22/03 09/23/03 030922L02 Parameter .Result RI_ D._F.F Oual Units Lead 1.62 0.50 I mg/kg J T-3A 6' 03-09-1211-6 09117103 Solid 09123103 030922L02 09122/03 Parameter Result RI. DF Oual Uojts Lead 2.04 0.50 1 rog/kg ! t-1B 2' 03~9-t2t 1-7 09/t 7/03 Solid 09/22/03 09/23/03 030922L02 parameter Result RI. D.__~F Qual Unit__..~s Lead 0.611 0.500 I mg/kg I T-Ia 6' 03-09-1211-8 09117103 Solid 09122/03 09123/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI.DF: Oual Units Lead O. 786 O. 500 1 mg/kg RL - Reporting Limit , DF - Dilution Factor , Oual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 i?.a_lscience -- ANALYTICAL REPORT ~=nvironmental ~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 09/20/03 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 03-09-1211 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 3050B. Method: EPA 601 OB Project: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Page 2 of 3 Lab Sample Date Date Date Client Sample Number Number Collected Matrix Prepared Analyzed QC Batch ID ! T-2B 2' 03-09-1211-9 09117103 Solid 09/22/03 09123103 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF: Qual _U_nits Lead 1.31 0.50 1 rog/kg I T-2B 6' 03.99-1211-10 09/17103 Solid 09122/03 09/23/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF Qual Uni._._.~ Lead 1.40 0.50 1 mg/kg J T-3B 2' 034)9-1211-11 09117/03 Solid 09122/03 09123/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF' Qual Units Lead 0.623 0.500 1 mg/kg I T-3B 6' 03-09-t211-12 09117103 Solid 09122/03 09~23/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF' Qual Uni~ Lead 0.556 0.500 1 mg/kg i D-1 2' 03-09-121t-13 09117103 Solid 09122/03 09123/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF Qual Units Lead 1 .g0 0.50 1 mg/kg I D-1 6' 03-09-1211-14 09117103 Solid 09122/03 09/23103 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DJ= Qual Un ts. Lead 3.64 0.50 1 mg/kg I D-2 2' 03-09-1211-15 09/17103 Solid 09/22/03 09123/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ DF Qual Units Lead 3.36 0.50 1 mg/kg J D-2 6' 03-09-t211-16 091t7103 Solid 09122/03 09/23103 030922L02 J Parameter Result RI_ DF Qual Units Lead 2.28 0.50 I mg/kg / , RL- Reporting Limit . DF- Di,ution Factor '"i Qua,- Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 * TEL: (714) 895-5494 * FAX: (714) 894-7501 ~-alscience ~_nvironmental ANALYTICAL REPORT ~.~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 09~20~03 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 03-09-1211 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 3050B Method: EPA 601 OB Project: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Page 3 of 3 Lab Sample Dale Date Date Client Sample Number Number Collected Matdx Prepared Analyzed QC Batch ID IMethod Blank NIA Solid 09/23/03 097-01-002-4,744 09122/03 030922L02 Parameter Result RI_ D._~F Qual Units Lead ND 0.500 I , mg~kg orting limit , DF - Dilution Factor , Qual - Qualifiers 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 ~..alscience ~F-~vironmental Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate j~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 09/20/03 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 03-09-1211 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 3050B Method: EPA 601 OB Project: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Date Date MS/MSD Batch Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Prepared Analyzed Number I D-'I 6' SOlid ICP 3300 09/22/03 09/23/03 030922S02 Parameter MS %REC MSD %REC %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers Lead 105 104 75-125 I 0-20 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 · TEL: (714) 895-5494 · FAX: (714) 894-7501 ~--alscience ~_nvironmental Ouality Control - Laboratory Control Sample ~ aboratories, Inc. Kiff Analytical Date Received: 09/20/03 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 Work Order No: 03-09-1211 Davis, CA 95616-6593 Preparation: EPA 3050B Method: EPA 601 OB Project: 7-Eleven Store #16834 Quality Control Sample ID Matrix Instrument Date Analyzed Lab File ID LCS Batch Number I 097-01-002-4,744 SOlid ICP 3300 09/23/03 030922-1-02 030922L02 Ppram~ter Conc Added Conc Recovered %Req %Rec CL Qualifiers Lead 50.0 53.8 108 80-120 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 · TEL:(714)895-5494 · FAX:(714)894-7501 ~=~alscience GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND QUALIFIERS ~nvironmenf~l ~=~ abomtories, Inc. Work Order Number: 03-09-1211 Qualifier Definition ND Not detected at indicated reporting limit. 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1432 * TEL: (714) 895-5494 * FAX: (714) 894-7501 Cooler ! of / SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM cLIENT: IFF- DATE: TEMPERATURE - SAMPLES RECEIVED BY: CALSClENCE COURIER: LABORATORY (Other than Calsclence Courier): Chilled, cooler with temperature blank provided. ['""~C Temperature blank. Chilled, cooler without temperature blank. ~ °C IR thermometer. ~ Chilled and placed in cooler with wet ice. ~ Ambient temperature. Ambient and placed in cooler with wet ice. ~ Ambient temperature. ~ o C Temperature blank. CUSTODY SEAL INTACT: Sample(s): ~ Cooler.~ No (Not Intact)' Not Applicable (N/A): SAMPLE CONDITION: Yes No N/A Chain-Of-Custody document(s) received with samples .........................,'"" .............. Sample container label(s) consistent with custody papers ..................... Sample container(s) intact and good condition ................................... '~' ....... : ....... Correct containers for analyses requested ......................................... Proper preservation noted on sample label(s) ................................................... . VOA vial(s) free of headspace ........................................................ ~ ....... . ....... Tedlar bag(s) free of condensation ................................................... ~ ....... ~ ....... Initial: COMMENTS: I'~rFF 2795 Second Street, Suite 300 Cai Science Environmental j Davis, CA 95616 7440 Lincoln Way ~.~ -~ ? "' ,/~',// Lab: 530.297.4800 Garden Grove, CA 92841 ~,4N~41YTiC,41_~Lc Fax: 530.297.4808 714-895-5494 I~hNo. Page 1 of Project Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): Geotracker COELT EDD REPORT? Chain-of-Custody Record and Analysis Request J~)el KEf YES X NO Company/Address: Kiff Analytical, LLC Sampling Company Log Code: Analysis Request Phone No.: FAX No.: Global ID: Project Number: P.O, No.: EDF Deliverable to (Email Address): Q_ O 77EL. 16834.23 35015 >. ~ ~ Project Name: E. mail address: 133 o, cu ~ 7-Eleven Store #16834 inbox@kiffanalytical.com ~ co ~ Project Address: Sampling Container Preservative Matrix ...J r'~ ~ Sample ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-:z ~e " Designation Date Time ~ ~ <EI ~- ~ -z°--~°z z~ ~ '~ O~U-I: CO T-lA 2' 9/17/2003 1429 1 X X X X T-lA 6' 9/17/2003 1438 1 X X X X T-2A 2' 9/17/2003 1418 1 X X X X T-2A 6' 9/17/2003 1425 1 X !X X X T-3A 2' 9/17/2003 1358 I X IX X X T-3A6' 9/17/2003 1412 1 X iX X X T-lB2' 9/17/2003 1511 1 X X X X T-lB 6' 9/17/2003 1517 1 X X X X T-2B 2' 9/17/2003 1453 1 X X X X T-2B 6' 9/17/2003 1504 1 X X X X .elinquished by: ~ ! ~ Date Time Received by: ~emarks: ~elinquishe~'~y: /' / Date Time Received by: Dav,s. CA 956,6 7440 Lincoln Way .~ -O(:~.- // Lab: 530.297.4800 Garden Grove, CA 92841 [ ANAI..YT/C~41.. u.c Fax: 530.297.4808 714-895-5494 Lab No. Page .. ;~ of 2 Pi~ject Contact (Hardcopy or PDF to): Geotracker COELT EDD REPORT? Chain-of-Custody Record and Analysis Request ~JQ~I Kiff __ YES _X__NO ICompany/Address: Kiff Analytical, LLC Sampling CompanyLog Code: Analysis Request ~ ~ Phone No.: FAX No.: Global ID: Project Number: ~.O. No.: EDF Deliverable to (Email Address): t3 O 77EL. 16834.23 35015 !~_ 04° ~>' ~ o Project Name: E-mail address: ;a30 04 ~ ~ 7-Eleven Store #16834 inbox@kiffanalytical.com ~ o ,- :3 Project Address: Sampling Container Preservative Matrix .-I E3 E ~, Designation Date Time ~ - < ~ :z:3: ~_ Ozz ~ ~ _~) =U'I 03 T-3B 2' 9/17/2003 1441 1 X X X X T-3B 6' 9/17/2003 1445 1 X X X X D-1 2' 9/17/2003 1243 1 X X X X D-1 6' 9/17/2003 1253 1 X X X X D-2 2' 9/17/2003 1303 1 X X X X D-2 6' 9/17/2003 1341 1 X X X X Relinquished by: .. Date Time Received by: Remarks: ~e~inquished'by: Date Time Received by: ~ SECO]{ Chain-of Custody Record Field ~ice: O~ ~cmme~o ~ AddEional d~umen~ am a~ch~, and are pa~ of this R~o~. _ Address: 3017 Kilgore R~d, SuEe 1~ Job N~e: 7-Eleven ~om ~16~ Rancho Cordov~ CA Location: 5~ West ~lumbus ,, Bak~sfleld~ Call.mia Proj~ ~ ~EL.16~4.23 Task ~ ~1~ ~al~s Re~ue~ Proj~ Manager Jeff Au~onle ~rato~ Klff Ana¥i~l Tumamund ~me S~ndard S~plefs Signatur~ a ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ Sample ID Date ~me Matrix ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ C°mmen~ m Instructions S~ial Ins~cfion~Comments Relinquished b~: R~eiv~ by: Sample R~eipt 50~gena~: TAME, ~BE, E~E, TBA, & DIPE Sign ~ ~ Sign ~ m~al ~. of ~ntainem: ~ail r~ul~ to Jau~Honle~secor.com Pdnt Mike' Dah~ PHnt ~ Ch~n of cust~ seals: ~ r~ul~ to: ~tlin~s~r.~m Company SECOR ~m~~. ~ R~'d {n ~ conditio~ld: ~me ~Date~ ~ ' Date ~fo~s to r~: Relinquished by: ~ R~eiv~ Sign ~ ~ Sign ~ Client: SECOR PHnt ~ PHnt '~~ ~~ Client Conta~: Jeff A~hterlonle Co~ Core.ny K~ Anal~l~l Client Phone: (916) ~1~30 ~ Date ~me I G ~ ~ Date ~ [~O% e~. ~3 Ohain of Ou~tod'~ Number:. SECOR Chain-of Custody Record Field Office: 077 Sacramento [--Ii Additional documents are attached, and are part of this Record. _ Address: 3013' IOl~lore Road, Suite 100 Job Name: 7-El®yen Store #16834 Rancho Cordova, CA Location: 525 West Columbus Bakemfield, California Project # 77E1_16834.23 Task # 0410 Anat Isis Request Project Manager Jaff Auchterlonie Lab°ratory *Iff An"iytlcal TurnaroUnd Time Standard ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._~ Sarape ID Dato lime Matrix Special Instructions/Comments Relinqui_shed~by: .~, Received by: ~ Sample Receipt 5 Oxygenates: TAME, MtBE, EtBE, TBA, & DIPE Sign ~-Sign _-- .~~ Total no. of containers:~ email results to Jauchterlonie@secor.com Print ' Mike Da~a Print -- .~~ Chain of custody seals: cc results to: dacatlin~secor.com Comp;m~ ~ ~ Compan~.~~ Rec'd in good condition/cold: Time Date ,~_¢,~ ~ Date Conforms to record:! Relinquished ~y: . ~ ~ Recei~l b~ .... Sign .~. ~ Si.gn ~ Client: SECOR ~ ~ Client Phone: (~16) 1161-0430 Time I,t~ I'~, Date(.3ct t¢-'¢O~ ext. 2~3 SECOR ATTACHMENT D FIELD NOTES UST Facility Removal Report 7-Eleven Store Number 16834 525 West Columbus Bakersfield, California SECOR Project No.: 77EL.16834.23.0521 TABLE 1 UST Removal Soil & Water Sample Field Collection 7-Eleven Store # [ Soil sample FID or~.- Soil ANALYSES REQUESTED Sample Sample Depth . Reading Type TPHg/BTE~MtBE LEAD Number Date (f~t bgs) (ppm) e260 Total rahkPi~::~Ples:~.~ :~ :.: : ~ .: :. Label samples as: T1-1-13' (T=Tank I= Tank ~1 1= Sample ~ 13~ sample de )th) T~ ~ L L L Dispenser:samples Label samples as: D1-4' (D=Dispenser 1= Dispenser location ~1 th~ ~3 4~ sample depth) D D D D D D ~bel samples in a manne~ si~7lar to ~yste~ lis~ed above including depth File: LIST and Line Sample Field Table.xls Page 1 of 2 JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store #16834 JOB NUMBER: 77EL.16834.23.0806 CONTACT: Mark Templeton (Excel Excavating) DATE PREPARED: 09/11/03 ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus OVER SITE BY: Mike Dana Bakersfield, CA DATE: Monday, 09/15 to Thursday, 09/19 SITE VISITATION REPORT Arrival Time: Departure Time: DRUM INVENTORY WATER CARBON TOTAL OPEN TOP SOIL EMPTY TOTAL BUNG TOP HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ONSITE AND NOTES JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store #16834 JOB NUMBER: 77EL.16834,23.0806 CONTACT: Mark Templeton (Excel Excavatin~l) DATE PREPARED: 09/11/03 ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus OVER SITE BY: Mike Dana Bakersfield, CA DATE: Monday, 09/15 to Thursday, 09/19 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ON SITE AND NOTES (cont) Field Work Conducted By: Date: JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store #16834 JOB NUMBER: 77EL.16834.23.0806 CONTACT: Mark Templeton (Excel Excavatin~ll DATE PREPARED: 09/11/03 ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus OVER SITE BY: Mike Dana Bakersfield, CA DATE: Monday, 09/15 to Thursday, 09/19 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ON SITE AND NOTES (cont) Field Work Conducted By: Date: JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store #16834 JOB NUMBER: 77EL,16834.23.0806 CONTACT: Mark Templeton (Excel Excavatin~lI DATE PREPARED: 09/11/03 ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus OVER SITE BY: Mike Dana Bakersfield, CA DATE: Monday, 09/15 to Thursday, 09/19 SITE VISITATION REPORT Arrival Time: Departure Time: DRUM INVENTORY WATER CARBON TOTAL OPEN TOP SOIL EMPTY TOTAL BUNG TOP HEALTH AND SAFETYASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES ONSITE AND NOTES ~ ~:~,Y, _, , JOB NAME: 7-Eleven Store #16834 JOB NUMBER: 77EL.16834.23.0806 CONTACT: Mark Templeton (Excel Excavating) DATE PREPARED: 09/11/03 ADDRESS: 525 West Columbus OVER SiTE BY: Mike Dana Bakersfield, CA DATE: Monday, 09/15 to Thursday, 09/19 "After arriving on-site, review work order and SSP, then call Jaff Auchterlonie in Sacramento" 1) Check in with Mark Templeton of Excel Excavating, Office ph - (949) 249-2225, Cell ph (714) 920-2661. You are scheduled to meet with Mark at 9 am. 2) Review Site Health & Safety Plan, address site hazards. Note potential hazards in field notes below. Review today's scope of work. Conduct a Health and Safety Meeting with Excel Excacating. Discuss site obiectives, health & safety, hospital location, etc. and document those present for meeting. 31 City of Bakersfield Fire Marshall, Steve Underwood is the inspector. , ,, Steve Underwood ph: (661) 326-3190 - Office (661) 496-0406 - Cell 4) Discuss with Jaff Auchtedonie: how long he would like you to stay. at the site on days you are not collecting soil samples. Take photos each day as the dismantling of the fuel station progresses. Complete detailed field notes, daily. 5/ Record those present for each today's scope of work and their affiliation. (Business cards) Ask Excel Excavating about their timeline for dismantling the fueling station. What quantity of stockpiles does Excel expect to ~lenerate? And ho~v quickly will he need the material removed? This will determine the amount of composite samples you will collect for analysis (and later disposal) and the turn around time on those samples. 6) Collect soil samples as directed by the inspector (Underwood). Take PID readings from each soil sampling location. Document the sample locations on your map and record PID readings in your field notes. Refer to Jaff's soil sample ID chart for naming sequences. Veri~ with Underwood, what anayes he would like run. .. Take photos of the site daily as the dismantling process continues. 7) When the USTs are pulled, please note any staining on the tanks or along the tank pit (soil) walls. Does the tanks appear to have any damage sus.tained from removal or before? Record the ID number on the UST. Document where the UST is being disposed, who is hauling i! and the manifest #. Please note quantity of drums on-site (if any) and what type of lid in the drum inventory section. Add to existing site plan show the location of any stockpiles, tank pit, dispensers, any visable lines and other features. Lab # Samples Container TAT, Analyse~ Soil Samples Kiff >6 Brass Sleeve Standard TPH~, BTEX and Oxys EPA 8260; Total Lead, EPA Lab Contact: Kiff Anal~tical Mr. Joel Kiff Phone: 530-297-4800 2795 2nd Street, Suite 300 FAX: 530-297-4802 Davis CA 95616 Please contact sample receiving (ext. 125) to let them know what to expect. Especially on rush samples. Kiff's FED EX number is: 214794519 Be sure to send all samples priority overnight with plenty of ice. 10) Contact Jaff Auchterlonie with any questions: cell (916) 825-4607 or (916) 861-0400 ext 223 -office - 11) Return original field notes and copies of the COCs to Jaff AuchteHonle in the Sacramento Office. Health & Safety Site Plan: Hand Au~ler, Impact sampler ~..~h extensions), Post Hole digger and a shovel. Brass Sleeves (6)(2"), Caps, .te~hlon tape. . FID or PID to measure soil tieadspace and to monitor breathin~l zone. ~,~ COCs and one Cooler .,w~ Ice Roll)' Wheel, graph paper and a pencil. '1/2" 9/16', and 1511.~,~sockets, and other misc. tools Camera, film, zip locks & sharpie pens. Direct all qbeStions to Jaff (916) 825-4607 or (916) 861-0400 ext 223 -office 17i5 'CheS~b~ A~e., ~ Bakeca~leld, ~ 93301 (805) 326-3979 T~ ~~ Z~PECTZ~ FO~ FACILITY 7'-~-c~'/~'~J &+~ (&%~4 ADDRESS O~R ~ ~~ c~ PE~ZT CONCUR ~~ ~~ CO~A~ PE~ON ~ST ~0~~ ' P~LI~Y ~SESS~ CO. ~ CO.ACT PE~ON CO~ ~CIEPT L~% '3-~ 0~% PLOT P~ CONDITION OF TANKS CONDITION OF PIPING CONDITION OF, SOIL COMMENTS [AJ~ ~,,~_ "I O Bakersfield Fire Dept. PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN,, Environmental Se=vices UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK 1715 Chester Ave Page 1 of 1 Bakersfield, CA 93301 [ PermitNo ]~.~ ~- 0"~ I [,. Tel: (661}326-3979 'TANK OWNERJOPERATOR -- -- ~ PHONE No/- --~\ ........ APN INSURANCE CAP~RIER .... t_ ' 0,,o l.r-o0/7~ 7~, WORKMENS COMP ~?":0 :~ .HONEN V4 INSURANCE CARRIER WORKMENS COMP NO.- * ~" __ PHONE NO WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FACILITY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NAME OF RINSATE DISPOSAL FACILITY ADDRESS CITY ~ ZIP CO[~o~Z CITy -- ZIP CODEg.~.~y TANKDESTINATION . . CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL TANK No. AGE VOLUME STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED ? For Official Us~ Only THE APPLICANT HAS R'ECEIVED, UNDERSTANbS, 'AND 'WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED GONDiTIONS'O£ THIS PERMIT AND'ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL ANO FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY~ AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AND CORRECT. THIS APPLICATION WILL BECOME A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED - ~_ Bakersfield Fire Dept. UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Enironmenta] Services ,', ,,,,,', ,, ' ' ' ' ' "' 1715 Chester Ave SECTION 1 Business Plan and Inventory Program Bakersfield, CA 93301 Tel: (661)326-3979 FACILITY NAME IINSPECTION DATE [ INSPECTION TIME FAC,UT, CONTACT . [~ine,s lU~_~(~2 i _ Section 1- Business Plan and Inventory Program ./ O Routine {~ombined {~ Joint Agency O Multi-Agency ~] Complaint O Re-inspection C V / C=C°mpliance I OPERATION COMMENTS ~. V=Violation APPROPRIATE PERMIT ON HAND BUSINESS PLAN CONTACT INFORMATION ACCU~ CORRECT OCCUPANCY VERIFICATION OF INVENTORY MATERIALS VERIFICATION OF MSDS AVAILABILI~E VERIFICATION OF ABATEMENT SUPPLIES AND PR~EOURES ...................... ......................... : ................................................................... HAZARDOUS WASTE ON SITE?: {~ YES I~"No ANY EXPLAIN: ~'1~ .~ us,ness Site Responsible Party White - Environmental Services Yellow - Station Copy Pink ~ Business Copy CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CltECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3ra Floor, Bakerstield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME "1- ~ ~ INSPECTION DATE ~* ! ~" 03 Section 2: Underground Storage Tanks Program [21 Routine [~ombined [~l Joint Agency ~ Multi-Agency [21 Complaint [~ Re-inspection Type of Tank ~t_IlbUC q Number of Tanks 93 Type of Monitoring &t_/~ Type of Piping ' ~ g:l eq. OPERATION C V COMMENTS Proper tank data on file Proper owner/operator data on file Permit fees current Certification of Financial Responsibility Mouitoring record adequate and current Maintenance records adequate and current Failure to correct prior UST violations / Has there been an unauthorized release? Yes No ~,/ Section 3: Aboveground Storage Tanks Program TANK SIZE(S). AGGREGATE CAPACITY Type of Tank Number of Tanks OPERATION Y N COMMENTS SPCC available SPCC on file with OES Adequate secondary protection Proper tank placarding/labeling Is tank used to dispense MVF? If yes, Does tank have overfill/overspill protection'? Inspector:C=C°mpl/ance ~... _~/~,""]~--Vi°l:tlf)n _~ff~_~ ~/J~_]'_ ~//' Y=Yes N=NO '-~in~(~ ~ Office of Environmental Services (661) 326-3979 Bus' ess Site Respt~sible Party White - Env. Svcs. Pink - Business Copy ,fcjo-,4 ~,O/J,~)'d I. gi-I ~c~Gc~ Z~ gOZ SO}.Gg 01 '~s!o~ s!J. sed ~-moJ:l GO:gO ~O"t~"Je~ I~99-:1 gtO/8OD'd ~9).-1 $GEcJ Z~'t 80Z 60t.;8 (]1 'esg°9 ~l,~'~d H'~"m°j:l' $0:80 · ComPlete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. [] Agent · Print your name and address on the reverse [] Addressee SO that we can return the card to you. Date · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item1 ? [] Yes 1. Article Addressed to: if YES, enter delivery address below: [] No 525 COLUMBUS ,3. Service Type BAYJ~RSF[ELD CA 93301 [] Certified Mail [] Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise ........ q [] insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7002 0860 0000 1641 6100 PS Form 3811, August 2ACPRI-03-Z-09e5 Postage $ Certified Fee Postmark Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required] Here =O _R~. icted DellveP/Fee r'~ {l=ndoreement Required] Total Postage~-~ r~ l Sent To Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-lO · Sender: Please pdnt ,_your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box ° February 13, 2003 7-11 525 Columbus Bakersfield CA 93301 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Certified Mail ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 RE: Recent SB 989 Secondary Containment Testing FAX (661) 395-1349 sUPPRESS,O. SEBV,CES SECOND REMINDER NOTICE 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 · VOICE (661) 326-3941 Dear FAX (661) 395-1349 ~JwnemJperator: PREVENTION SEBVlCES Our records indicate that you completed your secondary containment FIRE SAFETY SERVICES * ENVlRONI/ENTAL SERIflCE$ 1715 CheslerAvo. testing on September 9, 2002. Our records further show a failed test. Bakersfield. CA 93301 vOiCE (661) 326-3979 Therefore you are required to have your system repaired and re-tea;ted FAX (661) 326-0576 as soon as possible. PUBLIC EDUCATION 1715 ChosterAv~. This office requests an update with regard to repairs of your system. Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3696 Please be advised that repairs involving the replacing of components FAX (r~l) 32~576 must be under permit from this office. The repairs of your system are a condition of your permit to operate. Failure to repair and re-test will FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 ChestorAvo. result in the revocation of your permit to operate. Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661)326-0576 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661- 326-3190. TRAINING DlVlSION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Sincerely, VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 ~ ~ Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc January 22, 2003 7-1'1 FIRE CHIEF 525 West Columbus RON FRAZE Bakersfield CA 93301 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'f-I' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 R.F.,: Upgrade Certificate & Fill Tags VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Dear Owner/Operator: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, C^ 933O1 Effective January 1, 2003 Assembly Bill 2481 went into effect. This VOICE (661)326-3941 Bill deletes the requirement for an upgrade certificate of compliance FAX (661) 395-1349 (the blue sticker in your window) and the blue fill tag on your fill. PREVENTION SERVICES FIRE SAFETY SERVICES · Ek'V~ONMENTAI. SERVICES 1715 ChesterAve. You may, if you wish, have them posted or remove them. Fuel Bakersfield, CA 93301 vendors have been notified of this change and will not deny fuel VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 delivery for missing tags or certificates. PUBLIC EDUCATION 1715 ChesterAvb. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 661- Bakersfield, CA ~1 326-3190. VOICE (661)326-3696 FAX (661)326-0576 FIRE INVESTIC'.ATION 1715 Chester Ave, Sincerely, Bakersfield. CA 93301 .~ ~ VOICE (661) 328-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION Steve Underwood 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Office of Environmental Services SBU/dc / Tanknoiogy 8900 Shoal Creek Blvd, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR STEVE UNDERWOOD 1715 CHESTER AVE., 3RD FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Test Date: 09/11/2002 Date Printed and Mailed: 09/30/2002 Order Number: 3124931 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: 7-ELEVEN #16834 MARKET #2133 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Testing performed: Secondary Containment testing Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting · , su, s ~". Tan/mo/ogy TEST DATE: 09/~/~00~ WORK ORDER NO.: CLIENT: 7-ELLEN, INC. SITE: 7-ELEVEN ~16834 10220 S.W. GREE~ RO~ ~KET ~2133 SUITE ~70 525 ~ST COLEUS STREET PORTL~ OR 97223 B~ERSFIELD CA 93301 BOB DENISe 503-977-7713 Tank Interstital Tests Piping Intorstital PR~I~ Total Contai~ent PASS PUEMI~ Total Contai~ent FAIL REGUL~ Total Contai~ent FAIL RE~UL~ Total Contai~ent FAIL REGUL~ SYPHON Total Contai~ent PASS Sump & Under-Dispenser Containment Tests um~ ~ ~DIS~ ~ 91 0PW Fail U/L Total Contai~ent Pass 91 0Pw Fail U/L Total Contai~ent Pass 87 oPw Pass 1/2 Total Contai~ent 87 OPW Pass 3/4 Total Contai~ent 87SY. OPW Fail PR~ Total Contai~ent Pass 87SY. oPw Pass UL Total Contai~ent Pass PR~ Total Contai~ent Pass UL Total Contai~ent Pass Tanknology representative: Se~ices conducted by: KEN MINTON DAVID ~S~ SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TEST RESULTS NAME: 7-ELEVEN #16834 16834 09/11/2002 3124931 ;ITE ADDRESS: MARKET #2133 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 REASON FOR TEST: Compliance IGroundwater Level(" from grade): TANK INFORMATION AND INTERSTITIAL TESTS Dia. Matedal Manufacturer E~e,~o~h Test Method Start Initial Finish Final Pass/ Tanl Product Tank Size (" } Time Level Time Result Fail 1 REG UNLEAD 10018 92 DW STEEL Joor 51 Vacuum 1357 -10 "Hg 1457 -10 "Hg PASS 2 REG UNLEAD 10018 92 DW STEEL Joor 53 Vacuum 1405 -10 "Hg 1505 -10 "Hg PASS 3 PREMIUM 10018 92 DW STEEL Joor 51 Vacuum 1315 -10 "Hg 1415 -10 "Hg PASS 4 5 7 8 Comments: LINE INFORMATION AND INTERSTITIAL TESTS Dia. Len. Volume Start Initial Finish Final Pass/ Tank Product Matedal Manufacturer Test Method (" } (feet) (~lallons} Time Level Time Result Fail 1 F~REMIUM 4.00 61 FLEXIBLE Total Containment 20 Pressure 0931 5 psi 1031 5 psi PASS 2 PUEMIUM 4.00 45 FLEXIBLE Total Containment 15 Pressure 0940 0 psi 0943 0 psi FAIL 3 REGULAR 4.00 51 FLEXIBLE Total Containment 17 Pressure 0938 0 psi 0940 0 psi FAIL 4 REGULAR 4.00 32 FLEXIBLE Total Containment 10 Pressure 0935 0 psi 0938 0 psi FAIL 5 REGULAR SYPHON 4.00 11 FLEXIBLE Total Containment 4 Pressure 0936 5 psi 1036 5 psi PASS 6 7 8 Comments: LINES WILL NOT HOLD DUE TO TORN TERMINATION BOOTS. WILL NEED TO RETEST TO DETERMINE IF ANY OTHER PROBLEMS. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TEST RESULTS Work Order: 3124931 ', SUMP TESTS Type Tank or Disp Manufacturer Model or Diam./Width/Length Depth Start Initial Level Finish Final Pass/ # Matedal ( ,, ) ( ,, ) Test Method Time Level Change Time Result Fail Spill Container 91 FILL OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1030 7 4"VISUAL' 1045 3 gph Fail Spill Container 91 VAPOR OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1030 7 4"VISUAL 1045 3 gph Fail Spill Container 87 FILL OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1158 7 .00003 1215 .001 gph Pass Spill Container 87 VAPOR OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1126 7 -.00002 1145 .001 gph Pass Spill Container 87SY. FILL OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1030 7 4"VISUAL 1045 3 gph Fail Spill Container 87SY.VAPO OPW Plastic 11 13 VPLT 1129 7 " -.00000 1146 .001 gph Pass STP Sump PREM Total Containment Plastic 48 51 VPLT 1123 16 . .00002 1140 .012 gph Pass STPSump U/L Total Containment Plastic 48 51 VPLT 1210 21 .00000 1229 .014 gph Pass STP Sump U/L SYP. Total Containment Plastic 48 53 VPLT 1159 15 -.00008 1216 .016 gph Pass Dispenser Sump 1/2 TotaIContainment Fiberglass 46X2.6 29 VPLT 1417 3 .00000 1433 -.006 gph Dispenser Sump 3/4 Total Containment Fiberglass 46X26 29 VPLT 1419 3 -.00002 1435 -.014 gph STP Sump PREM Total Containment Plastic 48 51 VPLT 1140 16 .00000 1157 .014 gph Pass STP Sump UL TotaIContainment Plastic 48 51 VPLT 1229 21 ,, -.00055 1246 .032 gph Pass gph STP Sump UL Total Containment Plastic 48 53 VPLT 1247 15 .00000 1303 .014 Pass Comments: Both disp. sump tests are not valid. They are for diagnostics only!l! ' Wo~rk Order: 3124931 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 :' work Order: 3124931 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Work Order: 312493'1 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 W~rk Order: 3124931 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 W~rk Order: 3124931 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 W°¥k Order: 3124931 Ta~ology-~E 8900 Shoal Creek, Buil~g 200 Aus~, Texas 787:7 Work Order: 3124931' Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST DATE:0 9/11/02 WORK ORDER NUMBER3124931 CLIENT:7-ELEVEN, INC. SlTE:7-ELEVEN #16834 COMMENTS SB-989 test on all components. 91 line B and both 87 line interstitials failed - termination boots under dispensers are torn. 1.5 hours labor tightening all loose clamps and electrical fittings in STP sumps. 91 fill and vapor buckets failed. 87 syphon fill bucket failed. All tank annulars passed. All STP sumps passed. Both dispenser pans failed due to ripped secondary boots. PARTS REPLACED HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE) Printed 09/30/2002 08:06 SBOWERS SITE DIAGRAM 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST DATE: 09/11/02 WORK ORDER NUMBER3124931 CLIENT:7-ELEVEN, INC. SITE: 7-ELEVEN #16834 / ~?/~ o~ PREM ~ % O00VENTS Printed 09/3012002 08:06 SBOWERS 7-il 16884 525 W COLUMBUS ._ BAKERSFIELD~CA A0875381305001 SEP 24~ ~002 2:12 PM S'fGTEN STATUS REPORT ALL FUNCTIONS NORMAL INVENTORY REPORT T 1 :RUL VOLUME = 617'3 GALS ULLAGE = 3845 GALS 90.'4 ULLAGE= 284:3 TO VOLUME = 6064 GALS HEIGHT = 64.72 STK HEIOHT= 64.72 ~.~TE~ VOL = 0 ~RTER = 0.00 INCHE~ TENP = 85.3 DEG F T ~:RLIL--~Y-PHON ........... VOLLIME = 605? GALS ULLAGE = 3961 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 2959 GALS TC VOLUME = 5952 GALS HEIGHT = 63.75 INC:~ES STK HEIGHT= 63.75 Ih ~,IATER VOL = 0G' ~ATER = 1.04 I[. ,ES TEMP = 84.5 DEG F T 3:PUL VOLUME = 5866 GALS ULLAGE = 4152 GALS 90% ULLAGE= 3150 GALS TC VOLU~E = 5?63 GALS HEIGHT = 62.13 INCHES STK HEIGHT= 62,13 INCHES ~ATER VOL = 0 GALS WATER = 0,00 INCHES TEMP = 84.9 DEG F MANIFOLDED TANKS INVENTORY TOTALS T I:RUL T 2:EUL SYPHON VOLUME = 12230 TC VOLUME = 12016 GALS jORRECTION NC 'ICE BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT N° 1 0 6 2 Location SubDiv. ffo~ CO- C~(O~,k. ~ot You are hereby required to make the following cor~ctions at the above l~ation: Cor. No ~spector 3~8-357~ CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3r" Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME ADDRESS FACILITY CONTACT BUSINESS ID NO. 15-210- .,.. INSPECTION TIME NUMBEROF EMPLOYEES ~_~ Section 1: Business Plan and Inventory Program I~l Routine '~ Combined 1~ Joint Agency I~l Multi-Agency ~ Complaint [~ Re-inspection OPERATION C V COMMENTS Appropriate permit on hand Business plan contact information accurate Visible address Correct occupancy Verification of inventory materials Verification of quantities ~ / Verification of location Proper segregation of material Verification of MSDS availability Verification of Haz Mat training Verification of abatement supplies and procedures Emergency procedures adequate Containers properly labeled Housekeeping Fire Protection Site Diagram Adequate & On Hand C=Compliance V=Violation Any hazardous waste on site?: [~] Yes Questions regarding this inspection? Please call us at (66 I) 326-3979 usiness Site Responsible Party White - Env. Svcs. Yellow - Station Copy Pink - Business Copy Inspector: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIFIED PROGRAM'INSPECTION CHECKLIST 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor, Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME -].- (~. [cb/¢~ INSPECTION DATE Section 2: Underground Storage Tanks Program [] Routine ~/ombined [] Joint Agency [] Multi-Agency [] Complaint [] Re-inspection Type of Tank .J/~) F~ ~ Number of Tanks --~ Type of Monitoring ~J2/lh. Type of Piping OPERATION C V COMMENTS Proper tank data on file Proper owner/operator data on file Permit fees current Certification of Financial Responsibility Monitoring record adequate and current ~, / Maintenance records adequate and current Failure to correct prior UST violations ~ Has there been an unauthorized release? Yes No Section 3: Aboveground Storage Tanks Program TANK SIZE(S) AGGREGATE CAPACITY Type of Tank Number of Tanks OPERATION Y N COMMENTS SPCC available SPCC on file with OES Adequate secondary protection Proper tank placarding/labeling Is tank used to dispense MVF? If yes, Does tank have overfill/overspill protection? C=Compliance V=Violation Y=Yes N=NO Inspector: .... ~ ~ff~/~~'~v ~)~i~a Office of Environmental Services (805) 326-3979 Business Si rty · White - Env. Svcs. Pink - Business Copy CITY OF BAKERSFIELD OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (661) 326;'3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TANK TIGHTNESS TEST/' SECONDARY cONTAINMENT TESTING PERMIT TO OPERATE # OPERATORS NAME! '~ NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE ~ <;tV')0q IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED TANK # VOLUME !' CONTENTS TANK TF. STING C~M:PANY -"~.'~l, aKO~0Lo Sl'f s~ o~ ~~ o~ seEc~ mSeE~Ok:~0. ~ ~ ~~CA~ON ~ DA~&~~TmTOBECO~U~ No~ . q/q/OZ. Oq~ ~PRO~ BY DA~ SIONA~ OF ~P~C~ California Reg, onalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion ntrol Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston I~. I-Iickox .... Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental ]nternet Address: http://www,swrcb.ca, gov/rwqcb5 Protecti6n 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 3 September 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000852 Mr. Bob DeNinno 7-Eleven, Inc. . .... -- 3130 South Owyhee Street Bo!se, Idaho 83705 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, 7.ELEVEN,916834, 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Second Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Sampling Report (Second Quarter Report) dated 19 August 2002 and prepared by Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc., Concord (Shaw). The Second Quarter Report describes a quarterly groundwater monitoring event conducted on 26 May 2002. Two newly installed monitoring wells were sampled on 3 June 2002. Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) concentrations have decreased two orders of magnitude during the last two monitoring events. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue for one additional quarter and that you clarify a possible additional sampling event not discussed in the Second Quarter Report..Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and volatile organic compounds may be discontinued. Summaries of the project and the Second Quarter Report and our comments follow. Project Summary The site utilizes three 10,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) and two fuel dispenser islands. The site is approximately one-half mil6' southeast of the Kern River and 320 to 435 feet west- southwest of two canals. Groundwater was encountered in soil borings at approximately 15 feet below ground surface Cog's) during a site assessment investigation conducted on 31 July and 1 August 2000. Methyl tertiary butyl ether may have been released into site soils and groundwater from a faulty union joint near the turbine sump of the midgrade unleaded UST discovered during an October 1999 tightness test and subsequently repaired. A detailed Project Summary is provided in our letter dated 18 March 2002. California Environmental Protection Agency O Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,' see our Web-site at http://www.swreb.ca.gov/rwqeb5 Mr. Bob DeNirmo 2 3 September ~:002 Second Quarter Report Summary Shaw COnducted the Second Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring event on 26 May 2002. Monitoring wells MW- 1 through MW-3 were sampled. Shaw installed MW-4 and MW-5 on 23 MaY 2002 and · developed and sampled these wells on 3 June 2002. Depth to groundwater in monitoring wells MW-1 through. MW-3 on 26 May 2002 ranged from 16.77 to 17.43 feet belowthe~top of the casings (below TOC). Depth to groundwater in MW-4 and MW-5 on 3 June 2002 ranged from 17.00 and 17.85 feet below TOC. Shaw calculated the direction of groundwater flow to be toward the south-southwest and the gradient to be approximately 0.009 feet per foot, which is consistent with historical monitoring data. Depth-to-water data collected from MW-4 and MW-5 were not used in the calculations. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 on 26 May 2002 and from MW-4 and MW-5 on 3 June 2002 were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EP)~ M~th-6d 80.15M,-benz~n~-,-t61uYn~, '~h-~lb-en~effe~ hnff~yl~-n~-(BTEXyb~-EP3~"Metlib-d 802-0~ and methyl tertiary butyl ether, tertiary butyl alcohol, di-isopropyl ether, ethyl tertiary butyl ether, tertiary amyl methyl ether, 1,2-dichloroethane, and ethylene dibromide (MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB) by EPA Method 8260B. Samples collected from MW-4 and MW-5 on 3 June 2002 were also analyzed for 72 volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260. TPH-g and BTEX were not detected in the samples. MTBE was detected in the sample collected from MW-3, a downgradient well, at 23 micrograms per liter (gg/L) by both EPA Method 8020 and 8260. Volatile organic cOmpounds were not detected by EPA Method 8260 in the samples collected from " MW-4 and MW-5. Faxed cdPies'0f analytical reports by Geoanalytical Laboratories, Inc. for samples collected on 14 August 2002 and received on 15 August 2002 were included in the Second Quarter Report but are not discussed. Samples collected from MW-1 through MW-5 were analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8021B, 63 volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260, and general minerals nitrite, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Comments ...... Based on~re¥iew~of:the above, summarized-report, wehavet~he~following~comments: MTBE detected in downgradient monitoring well MW-3 has decreased from 2,600, 3,900, and 580 ~tg/L during the 25 September and 14 November 2001, and 7 February 2002 monitoring events, respectively, to 23 gg/L during the 26 May 2002 event. The MTBE may have been released into subsurface soils and groundwater from a known leak at a turbine sump product piping union joint (subsequently repaired) or from a vapor system release at the dispenser islands. Previous site assessment suggests that that impacted soils are confined to a relatively small volume in the immediate vicinity of the UST cluster. Investigation conducted on 23 May 2002 and monitoring data from the 26 May and 3 June 2002 sampling events also indicate that the dispenser islands do not appear to be an additional source of release. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) pilot test was conducted on 11 to 12 June 2002. The results of the SVE pilot test indicate that a large mass of x)olatile gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel additives does not appear to exist beneath the UST cluster. Shaw presented the results of the May 2002 site assessment and SVE pilot test in Report on Additional Site Assessment And Vapor Extraction/Vent Test dated 19 July 2002. U:\UGTkIDW_files~2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 GW 8-02.doc Mr. Bob'DeNinno - 3 - 3 September 2002 Faxed copies of analytical reports from Geoanalytical Laboratories, Inc. were-provided in the 'Second Quarter Report. The analytical reports indicate that the samples were collected on 14 August 2002 and received by the laboratory on 15 August 2002. We assume thi~ data was colle6ted .during the Third. Quarter 2002' monitoring event. However, this analytical data appears 'to ha,ce been entered in Table 2°f the SeCond Quarter report under the 26 May 2002 'monitoring event. Please Provide a written explanation clarifying the dates of collection and analysis. If this data was collected during the Third Quarter 2002 monitoring event, please so indicate. Final copies of the analytical reports and Chain-of- Custody documentation should be attached to the explanation. Please submit this informatiOn by 3'October 2002. If this data pertains to the Third Quarter 2002 monitoring event, please include it with the report documenting that sampling event by 4 November 2002 (see below). By our letter dated 20 August 2002 and previous letters, we requested that groundwater samples be analyzed for dissolved lead. Lead was reported in samples~'collected during the 26~ May.and 1~ .Au~gust 2002 at concentrations up to 220 gg/L. OUr experience suggests that these relatively high concentrations may have resulted from analysis for total lead. Our intention was that you analyze for dissolved lead using field filtration prior to acid preservation. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring continue for one additional quarterly monitoring event. We assume that this event will be the Fourth Quarter 2002 monitoring event, to be conducted during late November 2002. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-g by EPA Method 8015M, BTEX by EPA Method 8020 or 8260B, 'and MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA Method 8260B, and dissolved lead. Samples collected for dissolved lead should be filtered in the field. Analysis for general minerals, nitrate, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and VOlatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8260 (63-67 analytes) may be discontinued. Please submit the Third Quarter 2002 Monitoring and Sampling Report by 4 November 2002. Please be aWare that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement ~the requirements. As of the date of this letter, we have not received all the required electronic data submittals for your site. We are unable to approve the submission for the Third Quarter 2001 since general minerals, nitrate, and total Kj~ldahl nitrogen data, were ~in .not-included. We have.discussed :this. with ShaW staff iri tel~ph6n~ conversations. We understand that the laboratory that perfOrmed these analyses is no longer operating but that Shaw staff may be able to access the electronic data. Please contact this office by 3 October 2002' to provide an update concerning this situation. U:\UGT~JDW_files~2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 GW 8-02.doc Mr. Bob DeNinno - 4 - 3 September ~,~)Q2~ ~ Please have your consultant contact this office at least five days in advance of any fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. JOHN D. WHITING Associate Engineering Geologist R.G. No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms: B~bara_Rempel, SWRC_B, UST Cleanup. Fu_nd., Sa?ramento, w/o e_n__c!os~e -Mr. HOWard Wines m, Cffy of Bkker~fiel/:l Fire Ddpma. m~-fft,~B-aker~f~ld, Mr. Ed Simonis, IT Corporation, Sacramento, w/enclosure Ms. Shelby Lathrop, IT Corporation, Concord, w/enclosure . U:\UGTUDW_files~2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\71116834 GTM 8-02.doc August 30, 2002 7-11 525 W. Columbus Bakersfield, CA 93301 REMINDER NOTICE RE: Necessary secondary containment testing requirements by December 31, 2002 of underground storage tank (s) located at the above stated address. FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Dear Tank Owner / Operator, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 If yOU are receiving this letter, you have not yet completed the necessary secondary VOICE 1661) 326-3941 FAX 1661)395-1349 containment testing required for all secondary containment components for your underground storage tank (s). SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002, section 25284.1 (California Health VOICE 1661) 326-3941 FAX 1661)395-1349 1~ Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to insure that the systems are PREVENTION SERVICES capable of containing releases from the primary containment until they are detected 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 and removed. VOICE 1661) 326-3951 FAX 1661)326-0570 Of great concern is the current failure rate of these systems that have been tested to ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES date. Currently the average failure rate is 84%. These have been due to the 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 penetration boots leaking in the turbine sump area. VOICE 1661)326-3979 FAX 1661) 326-0576 For the last four months, this office has continued to send you monthly reminders of TRAINING DIVISION this necessary testing. This is a very specialized test and very few contractors are 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 licensed to perform this test. Contractors conducting this test are scheduling VOICE 1661) 399-4697 FAX 1661) 399-5763 approximately 6-7 weeks out. The purpose of this letter is to advise you that under code, failure to perform this test, by the necessary deadline, December 31, 2002, will result in the revocation of your permit to operate. This office does not want to be forced to take such action, which is why we continue to send monthly reminders. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (661) 326-3190. Sincerely,/?, Steve unoerwoo Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services July 30, 2002 7-1[ 525 West Columbus Bakersfield CA 93301 REMINDER NOTICE FIRE CHIEF RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Requirements by December RON FRAZE 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank (s) Located at ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES the Above Stated Address. 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Dear Tank Owner / Operator: FAX (661) 395-1349 If you are receiving this letter, you have not yet completed the necessary SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H' Street secondary containment testing required for all secondary containment Bakersfield, CA 93301 components for your underground storage tank (s). VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002, section 25284.1 (California PREVENTION SERVICES Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary FIRE SAFETY SERVtCES· ENVIRONMENTN. SERVICES 1715 ChestorAve. containment components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to insure Bakersfield, CA 93301 that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 containment until they are detected and removed. PUBLIC EDUCATION Of great concern is the current failure rate of these systems that have been 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 tested to date. Currently the average failure rate is 84%. These have been due VOICE (661) 326-3696 to the penetration boots leaking in the turbine sump area. FAX (661) 326-0576 For the last four months, this office has continued to send you monthly FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 ChestorAve. reminders of this necessary testing. This is a very specialized test and very few Bakersfield, CA 93301 contractors are licensed to perform this test. Contractors conducting this test VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 are scheduling approximately 6-7 weeks out. TRAINING DIVISION The purpose of this letter is to advise you that under code, failure to perform 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 this test, by the necessary deadline, December 31, 2002, will result in the VOICE (661) 399-4697 revocation of your permit to operate. FAX (661) 399-5763 This office docs not want to be forced to take such action, which is why we continue to send monthly reminders. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (661) 326-3190. Sincer~v, Fire Inspector Environmental Code Enforcement Officer ' July 30, 2002 7-11 525 West Columbus Bakersfield CA 93301 REMINDER NOTICE Frae C.~EF RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Requirements by December RON FRAZE 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank (s) Located at ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES the Above Stated Address. 2101 "H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93.301 vOICE (661) 326-394~ Dear Tank Owner / Operator: FaX (6Sl) 39s-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES If yOU are receiving this letter, you have not yet completed the necessary 2101 "H' Street secondary containment testing required for all secondary containment Bakersfield, CA 93301 components for your underground storage tank (s). VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 39,5-1349 Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002, section 25284.1 (California PREVENTION SERVICES Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary FIRE SAFETY SER~CES. EN~RONMANTN. SER~ICES 1715 Chester Ave. containment components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to insure Bakersfield, CA 93301 that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 containment until they are detected and removed. PUBLIC EDUCATION Of great concern is the current failure rate of these systems that have been 1715 Chester Ave. tested to date. Currently the average failure rate is 84%. These have been due Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3696 to the penetration boots leaking in the turbine sump area. FAX (661) 326-0576 For the last four months, this office has continued to send you monthly FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 CnesterAve. reminders of this necessary testing. This is a very specialized test and very few Bakersfield, CA 93301 contractors are licensed to perform this test. Contractors conducting this test VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661)326-0576 are scheduling approximately 6-7 weeks out. TRAINING DIVISION The purpose of this letter is to advise you that under code, failure to perform 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 933O8 this test, by the necessary deadline, December 31, 2002, will result in the vOICE (661) 390-4697 revocation of your permit to operate. FAX (661) 399-5763 ' This office does not want to be forced to take such action, which is why we continue to send monthly reminders. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (661) 326-3190. Sincerely, ~ Steve~Unde~ ~\ Fire Inspector Environmental Code Enforcement Officer D June 30, 2002 7-11 525 W. Columbus Bakersfield, CA 93301 REMINDER NOTICE RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Requirement by December 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank located at 525 W. Columbus. FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Dear Tank Owner / Operator: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 The purpose of this letter is to inform you about the new provisions in VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)395-1349 California Law requiring periodic testing of the secondary containment of underground storage tank systems. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Senate Bill 989 became effective January I, 2002, section 25284.1 (California VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to e.nsure PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary Bakersfield, CA 93301 containment until they are detected and removed. VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 Secondary containment systems installed on or after January 1, 2001 will be tested ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 ChesterAve. upon installation, six months after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Secondary containment systems installed prior to January l, 2001 will be tested by VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 January 1, 2003 and every 36 months thereafter. REMEMBER! Any component that is "double-wall" in your tank system must be tested. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Secondary containment testing shall require a permit issued thru this office and VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661)399-5763 shall be performed by either a licensed tank tester or licensed tank installer. Please be advised that there are only a few contractors who specialize and have the proper certifications to perform this necessary testing. For your convenience, I am enclosing a copy of the code for you to refer to. Once again, all testing must be done under a permit issued by this office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (661)326-3190. si¢ Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Environmental Services FII E May 29, 2002 7-II 525 W. Columbus Bakersfield, CA ,93301 RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Requirement by December 31, 2002 of Underground Storage Tank located at 525 W. Columbus FIRE CHIEF REMINDER NOTICE RON FRAZE )ear Tank Owner/Operator: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ['he purpose of this letter is to inform you about the new provisions in California VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Law requiring periodic testing of the secondary contaim'nent of underground storage Iank systems. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Senate Bill 989 became effective January l, 2002. section 25284.1 (California VOICE (661) 326-3941 Health & Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment FAX (661) 395-1349 components upon installation and periodically thereafter, to ensure that the systems PREVENTION SERVICES are capable of containing releases from the primary containment until they are. 1715 Chester Ave. detected and removed. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 Secondary containment systems installed on or after Sanuary 1, 2001 shall be tested upon installation, six months after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Secondary containment systems installed prior to January 1,2001 shall be tested by 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 January 1, 2003 and every 36 months thereafter. REMEMBER!! Any component VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 that is "double-wall" in your tank system must be tested. TRAINING DIVISION Secondary containment testing shall require a permit issued thru this office, and 5642 Victorave. shall be performed by either a licensed tank tester or licensed tank installer. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Please be advised that there are only a few contractors who specialize and have the proper certifications to perform this necessary testing. For your convenience, I am enclosing a copy of the code for you to refer to. Once again, all testing must be done under a permit issued by this office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (661) 326-3190. Sinc. e~ Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer SBU/kr enclosures D April 17, 2002 7-11 525 W Columbus F~RE CHIEF Bakersfield CA 93301 RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RE: Necessary Secondary Containment Testing Required by December 31, 2002 2101 "H" Streel Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)395-1349 REMINDER NOTICE SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Tank Owner/Operator: 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Thc purpose of this letter is to inform you about thc new provisions in California law FAX (661) 395-1349 requiring periodic testing of the secondary containment of underground storage tank systems. PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 ChesterAve. Senate Bill 989 became effective January 1, 2002. Section 25284.1 (California Health & Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 Safety Code) of the new law mandates testing of secondary containment components FAX (661) 326-0576 upon installation and periodically thereafter, to ensure that the systems are capable of containing releases from the primary containment until they are detected and removed. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Secondary containment systems installed on or after January I, 2001 shall be tested upon VOICE (661) 326-3979 installation, six months after installation, and every 36 months thereafter. Secondary FAX (661) 326-0576 containment systems installed prior to January 1, 2001 shall be tested by January i, 2003 and every 36 months thereafter. TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Secondary containment testing shall require a permit issued thru this office, and shall be VOICE (661) 399-4697 performed by either a licensed tank tester or licensed tank installer. FAX (661) 399-5763 Please be advised that there are only a few contractors who specialize and have the proper certifications to perform this necessary testing. For your convenience, I am enclosing a copy of the code for you to refer to. Once again, all testing must be done under a permit issued by this office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3190. Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer SBU/dm enclosures 8900 Shoal Creek Blvd, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Phone: (512) 451-6334 Fax: (512) 459-1459 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTOR STEVE UNDERWOOD 1715 CHESTER AVE., 3RD FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Test Date: 02/19/2002 Date Printed and Mailed: 03/08/2002 Order Number: 3121026 Dear Regulator, Enclosed are the results of recent testing performed at the following facility: 7-ELEVEN #16834 MARKET #2133 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Testing performed: Leak detector tests Line tests Monitor Certification Stage II AlL tests Stage II pressure decay tests Sincerely, Dawn Kohlmeyer Manager, Field Reporting CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM TESTING · 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST RESULT SITE SUMMARY REPORT TEST TYPE: TLD-1 PURPOSE: COMPLIANCE TEST DATE: 02/19/02 CUSTOMER PO: wc02201178 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 3121026 CLIENT: 7-ELEVEN, INC. SITE: 7-ELEVEN #16834 10220 S.W. GREENBURG ROAD MARKET #2133 SUITE 470 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET PORTLAND, OR 97223 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 BOB DENINNO Manager (503) 977-7713 (661) 322-7879 The following test(s) were conducted at the site above in accordance with all applicable portions of Federal, NFPA and local regulations Line and Leak Detector Tests 1 1 RES UNLEAD 0. 000 P Y P Y 2-SYPHON 2 REG UNLEAD 3 3 PREMIUM 0. 000 P Y P Y Tanknology appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call any time, day or night, when you need us. Tanknology representative: Test conducted by: CLIFF PORTER RICHMOND PHILLIPS .... ~-:'.-;i~/' ~ ..... .z ...,;.. ;~-..:?' Reviewed: Technician Certification Number: 91-1071 Printed 03~08/2002 07:53 SBOWERS I . su. s TEST DATE:02/19/02 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER3~21026 CLIENT: 7-~, Z~C. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 SITE: ?-~ ~1683A Tank ID: i 1 Tank manifolded: ~s BoSom to top fill in inches: 137.0 Product: ~G ~ Vent manifolded: ~0 BoBom to grade in inches: 142.0 Capaci~ in gallons: 10,000 Vapor recove~ manifolded: ~s Fill pipe length in inches: ~5.0 Diameter in inches: 92.00 Ove~ll protection: ~s Fill pipe diameter in inches: ~. 0 Length in inches: 352 Overspill protection: ~s Stage I vapor recover: Material: DW S~EL Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recoveq: ASSIST CPinstalled on: / / COMMENTS Start (in) End (in) II Dipped Water Level: New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Dipped Product Level: L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2 Probe Water Level: Make: VEEDEi~ROOT Model: P.L.D. Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage Test time: S/N: z?o2o7 Inclinometer reading: Open time in sec: Holding psi: VacuTect Test Type: NOT Resiliency in mi: NOT VacuTect Probe Entry Point: TSSTED Test leak rate mi/m: TESTED Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: Water table depth in inches: Results: PASS Determined by (method): Result: COMMENTS COMMENTS Material: ENVIROFLEX Diameter (in): 2.0 Length (fi): 50.0 Test psi: 50 Bleedback cc: 0 Test time (min): 60 NOT NOT NOT Start time: 07: 50 'Z'~S'I"ED T]~STED TEST]~D End time: 08: 50 Final gph: 0. 000 Result: PASS Pump type: PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: Printed 03/08/2002 07:53 TEST DATE:02/19/02 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 WORK ORDER NUMBER3121026 CLIENT: 7-~..T,~.VEN , INC. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 SITE: 7-~..T,~.V~N #16834 Tank ID: 3 3 Tank manifolded: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 140.0 Product: PR.V~TO~ Vent manifolded: NO Bottom to grade in inches: 145.0 Capacity in gallons: 10,000 Vapor recovery manifolded: 3rgs Fill pipe length in inches: 48.0 Diameter in inches: 92.00 Overfill protection: YES Fill pipe diameter in inches: Length in inches: 352 Overspill protection: YES Stage I vapor recovery: DUA.L Material: DW STJ~EL Installed: ATG Stage II vapor recovery: ASSIST CP installed on: / / COMMENTS Start (in) End (in) II Dipped Water Level: New/passed Failed/replaced New/passed Failed/replaced Dipped Product Level: L.D. #1 L.D. #1 L.D. #2 L.D. #2 Probe Water Level: Make: w~.Ds~.~oo? Model: Ingress Detected: Water Bubble Ullage Test time: S/N: 115359 Inclinometer reading: Open time in sec: Holding psi: VacuTect Test Type: NOT Resiliency in mi: NOT VacuTect Probe Entry Point: TESTED Test leak rate mi/m: TESTED Pressure Set Point: Metering psi: Tank water level in inches: Calib. leak in gph: Water table depth in inches: Results: Determined by (method): Result: COMMENTS COMMENTS Material: ENVIROFLEX Diameter (in): 2.0 Length (fi): 5o. 0 Test psi: 50 Bleedback cc: 0 Test time (min): 6O NOT NOT NOT Start time: 07: 50 TESTED 'I~ST~D TESTED End time: 08: 5O Final gph: 0. 000 Result: PASS Pump type: PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET COMMENTS Impact Valves Operational: Printed 03/08/2002 07:53 'ia~.,.,,I~.~.,-,,,,.. MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION A ~r' Use By All Ju#sdictions Within the State of CalifI Autho#ty Cited: Chapter 6.7~alth and Safety Code; Chapter 16, Division 3 Title 2~Iffalifornia Code of Regula#ons This fora3 must be used to document testing and servicing of monitoring equipment. If more than one monitoring system control panel is installed at the facility, a separate certification or report must be prepared for each monitoring system control panel by the technician who performs the work. A copy of this form must be provided to the tank system owner/operator. The owner/eperator must submit a copy of this form to the local agency regulating UST systems within 30 days of test date. A. General Information Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16834 City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93301 Site Address: MARKET#2133 Contact Phone No:322-7879 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET Facility Contact Person: Manager Date of Testing/Service: 02/19/2002 Make/Model of Monitoring System: TLS-350 Work Order Number: 3121026 B. Inventory of Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes to indicate specific equipment inspected/serviced nk ID: I Tank ID: 2 In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG-1 ~ In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG-1 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 420 Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [~ Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: ~] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: SLAVE TANK [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: PLLD Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: MAG-1 [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: MAG-1 Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). [] Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). 3 IanK IU: In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: MAG-1 [] In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 4ZU [] Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: 208 [] Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s). Model: ~] Fill Sump Sensor(s). Model: [] FilISump Sensor(s). Model: --~ Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: [] Mechanical Line Leak Detector. Model: '~1 Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: PLLD [] Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: ~ Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: MAG-1 [] Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: '-~ Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Other and model in Section E on (specify equipment type page 2). Dispenser ID. 1/;' ulspenser IU: Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: 352 [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: I Shear Valve(s). [] Shear Valve(s) [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). L)~spenser IL): 3/4 u~spenser IL): [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: 352 [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: [] ShearValve(s). [] Shear Valve(s). ,[--I Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). ID spenser ID: Dispenser ID: I[.__} Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s). Model: l~[] ShearValve(s). [] ShearValve(s). Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). [] Dispenser Containment Float(s) and Chain(s). * If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at the facility. C. Certification I certify that the equipment identified in this document was inspected/serviced in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines. Attached to this certification is information (e.g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is correct. and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equipment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached a copy of the (Check all that apply): System set-up report; r~ Alarm history report P~I PRINTED NAME:RICHMOND PHILLIPS SIGNATURE: ,~,%:.~....:. .... ,;..v ...,..:..: ...... COMPANY: Tanknology PHONE NO: (800) 800-4633 page 1 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03101 {~onitoring System Certification Site Address: MARKET #2133 Date of Testing/Service: 02/19/2002 525 VVEST COLUMBUS STREET D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed: 120.0 Complete the following checklist: [ [] Yes [] No * IS the audible alarm operational? [] Yes [] No * Is the visual alarm operational? [] Yes [] No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not [] Yes [] No* interfere with their proper operation? [] Yes [] No* [] N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment [] Yes [] No * [] N/A monitoring system detects a teak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (check all that apply) [] Sump/Trench Sensors; [] Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? [] Yes [] No [] Yes [] No* [] N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e.: no mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger?. 90 % [] Yes* [] No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. [] Yes* [] No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (check all that apply) [] Product; [] Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. [] Yes [] No * Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. [] Yes [] No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers' specifications? · In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. E. Comments: page 2 of 3 ~nitoring System Certification Site Address: MARKET #2133 Date of Testing/Service: 02/19/2002 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET F. In-Tank Gauging / SIR Equipment [] Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. [] Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Complete the following Checklist: [] Yes [] No * Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? [] Yes []No* Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? [] Yes []No' Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? []Yes [] No * Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? []Yes []No* Were all probes reinstalled properly? [] Yes []No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD) · [] Check this box if LLDs are not installed. Complete the following checklist: For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? [] Yes [] No []N/A (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: [] 3 g.p.h [] 0.1 g.p.h r-~0.2 g.p.h [] Yes, [] No * Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? [] Yesi [~No * Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? [] Yes [] No * [] N/A For mechanical LLDs, does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? [] Yes []No* [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled or disconnected? [] Yes ['--]No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions or fails a test? [] Yes []No * [] N/A For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? [] Yes [~No *1 Were all items on the equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H, below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H. Comments: page 3 of 3 'Work o~er: ~o2~ ..:.:. .~.~..~ . :~:'::~ ....... '.:.::.::~:~: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::...' ..... '. · :::~ ' Ig~*~ :': ................... · .=========================: ' . ST AF~'!' T'D'~E · Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 :'Work O~der: 3121026 ..~.~':'ii~ ~ · ~; '". :::: : .......... .. ';::i:'i?' ?:':J~'::' :!:i, ~.'~: :'.~': .',~..;: T~olo~-~E 8900 Shoal Creek, Bulldog 200 Aust~, Texas 78757 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 .................. ~ .'[' 5::: ~ ~ Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 ~ork f~der: 3121026 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 ;~Vork O~der: 312'1026 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Work Order: 3121026 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Work Order: 3121026 Tanknology-NDE 8900 Shoal Creek, Building 200 Austin, Texas 78757 SITE DIAGRAM 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING 200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 459-1459 TEST DATE: 02/19/02 WORK ORDER NUMBER3121026 CLIENT:7-EZ~VEN, INC. SITE: 7-ELEVEN #16834 E EM ~ O00VENT8 P REG ~'~~ Printed 03/08/2002 07:53 SBOWERS 83/~.84/2~82 15:i3 5123B872i5 TANKNOmOGY PAGE 8900 SHOAL CREEK, BUILDING :200 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757 (512) 451-6334 FAX (512) 45g-1459 TEST RESULT SITE SUMMARY REPORT TEST TYPE; TLD-1 PURPO~.~----r~C~~ CLIENT: 7-ELEVEN, It/C. /SITE: ?-ELgVJ~N #16834 suz~ 47o / s2s ~sz COLEUS SZ~Z~ PORT~, OR 97223 ~ ~RSPIE~, ~ 93301/ BOB DENI~O ~ ~ger Thc f01Jo~in~ t:cst(s) were condu~ a~ th~ s{~c abov~ io ~ccord~~ '.~~rak NFPA ~d local Line and Leak DeteCtor Tests ' I.w: iiii~l~,~,t~ ,l~/~'!',/t~.~t!~!~ ~:~ ;~,,I~ '1 t' ' ~ .. . i i ~ ~z~ o.ooo ~ ~ ~ ~ 2-s~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~z~ o. ooo ~. x ~ ~ 'Kankno;ngy epprcciatcs thc opportunity to serve you. and looks ~,ard to working ~,id~ you in thc Cuturc. P)e~c c$II ally time. dny or Ili~ht, whcn yOU mleed Tanknology repre~ntative'. .... $e~lces conduced by: '~N ~INT~ ' 'RIC~~ P~ILLIPS · .,~.?:Y" ~;~' /~..,'5- ', -" .- : .,~-%?,.t:..'*'~--, . ' i. :' ' ~,' · ReViewed: Technician Ce~ificafion Number: 91-1071 Draft 03/0412002 1,~;sg MFRISK -- 03/.~4/2~B2 15:13 5123B~7215 TANKNOLOGY PAGE 12 ~ ~',?-I~ ~ ~ MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION .~For Use By All Judscliction$ H, fithin the State of Authority Cite~.' Cl~epter [~ Heetth a~d Sa~e~ ~de; C~epter 16. Dtvi$~on 3 T/fie 23, Cali~mie Code of Regulations c~flifi~fl.~ o~ mpg~ust be~ared t~ aach mo~ iorin~s~em con~l~anel by the technician who pedormS t~ work A copy Of thio ~ must ~e p~vided to the tank system owner/opera,or. The ~ner/opera~r must suDm~t a ~py of thl~ term to the to~l agen~ regul~lng UST sys~ms ~th~n S0 ~aya et ~st ~ate. A. General Information Facility Name: 7-ELEVEN #16834 City: BAKERSFIELD CA Zip: 93301 Site Address: MARKET ~r2133 Contact Phone No:322.7879 S25 WEST COLUMBUS STREET Facility Contact Person: _Mana_qer. Date of Testing/Service: 02/19/2002 Make/Model of Monitoring Sy.~tem: TLS-350 Work Or,er Number: 3121026 B. Inventory o! Equipment Tested/Certified Check the appropriate boxes bo indlc~te spec;tic equipment inspected/serviced tTanklD: 1 . ITanklD: 2 ~n.T~nk Gsu.cllr~g Probe Modek MAG-1 ~_ ~n-Tank Gauging Probe Mo0e~: MAG-1 ~) Annular Space or Vault Sensor. Model: 42{) }~sJ Annular Space or Vault Sensor Model: 420 - ~ Piping S~mp~rrench'$enSoris). ~o0el:- ~;~08 .... ~ Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s]. Model: 208 Fill Sumq Sensor(s). G_.G_jj FI,I Sump Sensor(s'l. Model'. ~ Modal: Mechanical Line Leek Detector· MOdel: Mechanlca~ Line Leek Detector. Mode~: 3 Electronic Line Leak Detector. Model: SLAVE TANK [~ Electronic Line Leek Detector MedeI: ~ Tenk Ovedill/Hlgh. LevelSen~r. Model: MAG-1 ~ Tank Overfill/High-Level Sensor. Model: MAG-I 3 Other (specify equipment ~ype one model In Section E on page 2). [L..J Other (specify equipment type and model in Section E on page 2). Tank ID: _3 ' .. ITanK ID: X'~ In-Tar.~- Gauging Probe. Model: MAG-1 i[]~ In-Tank Gauging Probe. Model: AnnuJar Space or Vault Sensor. Model; 420 Annular Space o~ Vault Sensor. M0det'. Piping Sump/Trench Sensor(s)· Me,el: 208 Piping Sump/Trench Ser~sor(s) Model: Fill SUmp Sensor(S]. Model: Filr Sump Sensor(s). Model: Mechanical Line Leak Detecter. Model: J 5 MechaniCal Line Leak Detector. Model: Electronic Lln~ Leak Detector. Model; PLLD iD Electronic Line Leak De:acer. Model: Tank Ove~ll/High. LevelSensor. Model: MAG-1 D Toni( Ove~/L/Hlgh. Level Sensor. Model; Ot~cr {specify e0ulDment type and m~el in Section Ecn page 2). '-'] Other (spec~/y equipment type and model In Sect;on E on page 1/2 Dispenser ID: Dispenser Containment Float(,) and Chain{a) "~ Dispenser Cenfalnment FIoal(S) and Chain{,}. Dispenser ID: 3/.~.4 Dispenser ID: [] Dispenser Containment Sensor(s) Model: 352 ~ Dispenser Centainmen[SensOr(s). M¢0el: [] she~r valve(e), -'~ snea~ I['--~ DispenSer Conralflmen*, Fio3'[(~) and C~-in(a~. -- - [] Dlsl~ens~r C~ntalnmant Float(s) and Chain(si li._.l Dispenser lO: ID/spenser ID: n"} Dispenser ContalnmentSenscr(s) Model: J--"] Dispense~Centainment Sensei(s). Model: [] ,SheerValvo(s). ~'~ ShearV~lve(s]. D~spenser Containment Float(S) and Chain(s). [] Dispenser Con~ainmenl Float(s) and Chain(a). ' If the facility contains more tanks or dispensers, copy this form. Include information for every tank and dispenser at'the facility. C. Certification ~--:- '1 certify that the equipment Identified' in this document was inspectecl/serviced in accordance with the manur'acturers' gu/del;nee. At~ached to tills certification is information (e,g manufacturers' checklists) necessary to verify that this information is correct, · "and a Site Plan showing the layout of monitoring equipment. For any equ;pment capable of generating such reports, I have also attached e copy of the (Check all that apply): System set-up report; E~ Alarm history report COMPANY: Tanknolociy PHONE NO'. (800) 800-4633 page 1 of 3 Based on CA form cia:ed 03/01 83/04/2882 15:13 5123887215 TANKNOL_OGY PAGE 13 OMonitoring Syslem Ccrtification Site Address: MARKET #2133 Date of Testlne/Service'. 02/19/2002 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET D. Results of Testing/Servicing Sol:twarc Vcr~ion InSL, dlcd; 120.0 Complete the following checklist: [] Y:~ [~ No · Is the audible alarm operational? [] ¥c~ [].~o' lethe visual alarm operational? ,,, [] '¥~.: ~ Nn ' Were ail sensom visually inspected, f?~tonally tes~d, a~d COhered ope,,~tional? ~ Ycr. ~ ~,o · Were al~ san~ install~ 3t lowest point of seconda~ con~inment an~ posEIone~ so that other equipment will not integra with their prope~ operation? For pressurized piping s~ms~ does the turblne eu~omati~ily shut down If the piping se~ndaw containment ~ v~ ~ N,,. ~ N/A monitoring system dete~ a lea~, fails to ooeram, or is elsctrice~ly disconnemed? If yes: which seesors shut-down? (~eck all ~hat apply) ~ Sump~ren~ Sensors; ~ DIsoenser Con~lnment Sensors, Did you confi~ Oosltlve shut-down due to leaks ~ sensor faJlu~/dlsconnection? ~ y.. J~ w,~ ~ N.' ~ N/,% For tank systems that utilize the monitoring sys[em as the p,imaw rank ovedill ~rning devi~ (i.e.', ,o mechani=l overfill prevention valve is installed), is the ove~ll warning alarm visible and audible st the tank fill p0in~(s) and operating properl~ If so, at ~at percent of tank ~padty does the alarm trigge~ 9o .... ~ y~' ~ N,, was any monitoring ~uipment replaced? {f yes. identl~ specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and Fist the manu~umr name and model ~r all re~la~ment pa~ in Section E, below. ~ y~, ~ ~,~ Was liquid ~und inside any seconda~ ~nminment systems design~ es d~ systems? (che~ all that apply) ~ P~du~; ' ~ Water. If yes, describe ~uses in Section E, below. , ....... ~ Yc~ ~ No · Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings7 Affach set. up reDo~s, if applicable. ~ v:~ ~ N~ · ~s all monitoring equipment operational ~er manufacture~' specifications? I · I~ 5CC[iOq E hc~nw, describe how mid w'hcll tl~e~e tlc~cicn~s w¢~ or w~lJ ~c E. Commcnts: P~GE 03/,84/2802 15:],.3 5123887215 TANKNO~-~'cY Monitoring System Certification Site Address: MARKET//2133 Date of Testing/Service: 02!19/2002 525 WEST COLUMBUS STREET Tn-Tank Gauging / SIR [quipmcnt [~ Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory contn3L [] Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. Cnmplete thc following checklist: j'-'] Y'cs F-'~No' ~as all Input wiring been inspeoted for proper entry and termination, Including testing for ground fault~? ~ yc.~ E~No-.- --Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? [] Yc~ J'~No ' Was accuracy of system product le~el readings tested? []Ye., []Nc)* Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? [] Y¢.~ ~]No' Were all probes reinstalled properly? [] Yc, E~No * Were all items on tile equipment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? ' In the Section H. below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected, G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): [] Check this box if LLDs are not installed. C~mpltle thc followin~ chectdlst: For equipment start-up or annual aqulpment certiflcat~on, was a lea~ simulated to verify LLD performance? I[~ ¥c~ [] ~"' ~g/^ (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: [] 3 g,p.h [] 0.1 ~.p.h ~--']0,2 g.p.h ~ Ye, [] No · Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? [] ¥~, [~No' Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? [~¥~.~ ~-jw~. [~N/^ Formechan~celLLDs. does the LLD restrict product f~ow ff ~t detects a leak? [] ¥,.. r'[No · [] N/A For electronic LLDs. does the turbine automatically shut off If the LLD detects a leak? [] Yes []No ' I [] N/^ For electronic I. LDs, does tile turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring System IS disabled or disconnected? F'~ ¥:.. E~N. * [] N/^ For electronic LLDs. does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the moni[oring system malfunctions or fails a test? [] Yc.~ ~--"~N(~' ! [] N/^ For electronic LLDs, have all accessible wlrlng connections been visually inspected? I " [~ ~,,=~ []Nh* Were all items On the e,,q,,ulpment manufacturers' maintenance checklist completed? · In the Section H. below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. H. Comments: Postage $ . ~'~1- %` Certified Fee 2. '10 Postmark Return Receipt Fee 1 o 50 Here (Endoreement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 3.9/* Sent To BOB DElq~llqO ~ ~;~;;i,';~'tT/~:?~;" ~ '~;F ~ ........................................................... ? o ]~ox 711 ~ ~ii~,"~i;i';;fiF+';i ............ "_ ............. '~2'"': ....................................... · DALLAS TX 95221 u/ti Cerlified Mail Provides: · A mai~ing receipt [] A unique identifier for your mailpiece [] A signature upon delivery · A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: [] Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Pdority Mail. [] Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. · NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. [] For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postm,ark on your Certified Mail receipt is r~quired. ' [] For an additional fee, delivery,may~,be-~estdcted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". · If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a p~9. strgark ~,n the Certified Mail receipt is not detach and affix label wiJh'~)sta~e and mail. IMPORTANT: receipt and present it when making an inquiry. P~ Fnrm ~Rfln M~u gNllfl · Comple't~'i;~'~-r~s 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Received b~ item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print you~ name and address on the reverse so that we c~n return the card to you. C. Signature · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X [] Agent or on the froqt if space permits. [] Addressee D. Is deliver different from item 17 [] Yes 1. Article AddreSsed to: , address below: [] No 3. Service Type ])Al,LAS, 3'X: 0.5221 -0711 ~ Certified Mail [] Express Mail P-~-' 525 W COLI]~]~US~ 3601 [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise I00 ~_'I*'MI:IAT.T. (0600) 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. ArticleNumber (C_ o~v from service label) 7000 0520 0021 9610 7714 'g- m stic Return Reoeipt UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ' Sender: Plea me, addr?~ss~ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 9,3,301 · ~ .-.-: .'_:::.'_~ i +.'-_-.2 i'0. · February 20, 2002 Bob Deninno 7-11 P O Box 711 Dallas, TX 95221-0711 CERTIFIED MAIL FIRE CHIEF NOTICE OF VIOLATION & SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE RON FRAZE RE: Failure to Submit/Perform Annual Maintenance on Leak Detection ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street System at 7-11,525 W. Columbus, Ba~kersfield, CA., 7-11, 3601 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Stockdale Hwy, Bakersfield, CA., 7-11, 4101 Calloway, Bakersfield, CA VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 7-11, 9600 Brimhall, Bakersfield, CA SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Deninno: 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Our records indicate that your annual maintenance certification on your leak FAX (661) 395-1349 detection system is past due. February 1, 2002, February 19, 2002, February 23, PREVENTION SERVICES 2002, February 23, 2002. 1715 Chester Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661)326-3951 You are currently in violation of Section 2641(J) of the California Code of FAX (661) 326-0576 Regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES "Equipment and devices used to monitor underground storage tanks shall be 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 installed, calibrated, operated and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661)326-0576 instructions, including routine maintenance and service checks at least once per calendar year for operability and running condition." TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield. CA 93308 YOU are hereby notified that you have thirty (30) days, March 22, 2002, to either VOICE (661) 399-4697 perforn'l or submit your annual certification to this office. Failure to comply will FAX (661)399-5763 result in revocation of your permit to operate your underground storage system. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 661-326-3190. Sincerely, Ralph Huey Director of Prevention Services Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer Office of Environmental Services cc: Walter H. Porr Jr., Assistant City Attorney