HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK #1-C-04/14/94 CI T Y of BAKER SFIELD
"WE CARE"
April 14, 1994
FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301
ACTING FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
The Southland Corporation
5820 Stoneridge Mall, 3rd Floor
Pleasanton, CA 94688
RE: 7-Eleven Store #23446 at 2300 Columbus St., in Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Bob Vasquez:
This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results of the Soil
Assessment dated January 5, 1994 associated with the Underground Storage Tank Removal.
Based upon the information provided, this department has determined that appropriate
response actions have been completed, that acceptable remediation practices were
implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial or removal action or
monitoring is required at the above stated address.
Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a satisfaction or
release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result of past, current, or future
'operations at this location. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to
limit the rights of any parties with respect to claims arising out of or relating to deposit or
disposal at any other location of substances removed from the site. Nothing in this
determination iSintended or shall be construed to limit or preclude the Regional Water Quality
Control Board or any other agency from taking any further enforcement actions.
This letter does not relieve the tank owner of any responsibilities mandated under the
California Health and Safety Code and California Water Code if existing, additional, or
previously unidentified contamination at the site causes or threatens to cause pollution or
nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or water quality. Changes in land use
may require further assessment and mitigation.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3979.
Sincerely,
Ralph E. Huey
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/ed
cc: D. Norman, Kleinfelder
I .... BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPART T
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
?.2 ~une 1982 ~1[ 1il
Date APPLICATION Application No.
In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulation?, application is made
by: -~ ~ .
Alton Construction 2300 ¢olunbus
Name of Company Address
to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or creating con-
ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows:
,Per. esCort to install 3 - 12~000 §el under,round ~solt~e storage ~'nks.
Location v~,tl, be a 7-1I :';tore, PermiCee is 14r,. Joe qu~r°~,~ ~
.,.--~'---"-~ Authorized Representative
// ' ~
..r~,..~., ............... ~.~ .... ~.,....:. ........ ~... ,, ........... .,,:..~.~ ..... ..~~--.-.---~......
. (,...] Dote Fire Morshol ,f}_
7 ELEVEN FOOD STORE #2125-23446 ID Number: 215-000-000811
ESTER 01/12/93
Location: NO LONGER IN BUSINESS ° Bus. Phone: (805) 871-1438
City : Community: BAKERSFIELD STATION 08
Mail: 2300 COLUMBUS ST State: CA
City: BAKERSFIELD ~. Zip: 93306-
Owner: THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION Phone: (805) 834-2711
Addrs: 3128 WILLOW AV SU 301 State: CA
City: FRESNO Zip: 93612-
IParcel ID: Dunn/Brad: 00-734-7602
] Last Inv.: 000025U SqFt:
SIC: Your Activity Code: Last P.O.:
<A> Financial <B> Tracking <C> UST Info <D> Topic D {E> Topic E
<F> Event F <G> Event G <P> Print <Esc> Exit
ELEVEN FOOD STORE #2125-23446 ID Number: 215-000-000811 7
<A> Financial Branch
<1> General Information VALERIE 09/14/92 ~
Fee Groups
~A:99 C: E: G: I: K: M: O: Q: S: U: W: Y:
<5> Account History
Prog Date Type Invoice Misc. Notations Debit Credit Balance
U 03/17/93 ManInv 000023U ~O~ 74.38--/~ 0.00 74.38
U 10/11/93 ManInv 000024U 31.~00 0.00 105.38
U 04/04/94 ManInv 000025U 124.00 0.00 229.38
<1> Gen. Info. <2> Cur. Bill. <3> UST Permit <4> UST Action <5> Acct Hist
<%> Next <~> Previous <P> Print <Fl> Help <Esc> Exit
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
October 11, 1993
FIRE DEPARTMENT ~" 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Dave Norman
Kleinfelder
1975 "E" Street
Fresno, CA 93706
RE: 2300 California Ave.
Dear Mr. Norman:
· This is to notify you that the workplan that we discussed today, for the fUrther
assessment at 2300 Columbus Ave., is satisfactory. However, if the single boring
planned results in detection of-significant hydrocarbon contamination then it may be
necessary to advance additional borings to fully define the extent of the plume.
Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to commencement of work. If you
have any questions, pleaSe call meat (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely yours,
Ralph E. Huey
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/ed
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FiRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON March 18, 1993 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Steven R. Strait, C.E.G.
EMCON Associates
4233 W..Sierra Madre, Suite 109
Fresno, California 93722-3995
RE: 7-Eleven Store, #23446, 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield
Dear Mr. Strait,
This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated
address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days
notice prior to the commencement of work.
Please be advised that any work done that is not performed
under direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unless
previously approved.
If you have any questions,, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely, .. /-/ ~
~C.~r-~_...~,,,~~~'"' ... ~:' ~- .
x-~/~alph E. Huey
/ Hazardous Materials Coordinator
~ Underground Tank Program
REH/dlm
GmCOll Associates
4233 W. Sierra Maclre · Suite 109 · Fresno, Cdifornia 93722-3995 · (209) 275-4968 · Fox (209) 275-51g~
March 12, 1993
Project 0A3003602
Mr. Ralph E. Huey -- - -' RECEIVED
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
City of Bakersfield {~1~ 1 5 1993
Fire Department HAZ. MAT. DIV.
2101 "H" Street '
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Addendum to workplan for soil sampling and analysis beneath former underground
storage tanks at 7-Eleven Store #23446, 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield
Dear Mr Huey:
On behalf of The Southland Corporation (Southland), EMCON Associates (EMCON) is
pleased to present this addendum to the September 4, 1992 workplan to evaluate the
vertical and horizontal extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils at Southland Store #23446,
at 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California. This addendum was prepared in
response to a February 4, 1993 letter from the City of Bakersfield requesting further site
characterization of the vertical extent of impacted soils in the vicinity of the former
underground storage tank cavity.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this addendum or the original workplan
please call EMCON at (209) 275-4968.
Sincerely,
EMCON Associates
Steven R. Strait, C.E.G.
Group Manager, Geology
Gmcofl Associates
4233 W. Sierra Madre · Suite 109 ,, Fresno, Californio 93722-3995 · (209) 2?$-4968 · Fax (209) 275-5181
March 12, 1993
Project 0A30-036.02
Mr Bud Good
The Southland Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, CA 94556
Re: Addendum to workplan for soil sampling and analysis beneath former
underground storage tanks at 7-Eleven Store # 23446, 2300 Columbus Street,
Bakersfield
Dear Mr Good:
EMCON Associates (EMCON) presents thi~ addendum to the September 4, 1992
workplan for site assessment at Southland Station #23446 at 2300 Columbus Street,
Bakersfield, California. This addendum was prepared in response to a February 4, 1993
letter from the City of Bakersfield requesting further site characterization of the vertical
extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils at the site.
BACKGROUND
On April 15, 1992, three 10,000-gallon underground fuel storage tanks, designated A, B,
and C, were removed at the site. The tops of the tanks were approximately 4 feet below
grade (BG). The tank bottoms were approximately 12 feet BG. On April 16, 1992, under
the direction of Mr. Joseph Dunwoody of the Bakersfield City Fire Department,
Hazardous Materials Division, EMCON field personnel collected soil samples Al, A2,
BI, B2, C1, and C2 from native soil at depths of approximately 2 feet and 6 feet below
each end of the former underground tanks (Figure 1). The tank cavity was backfilled on
April 16, 1992 with soil excavated from the tank pit and imported fill.
The results of the soil analyses are summarized on Table 1. Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline ranged from 3,300 parts per million (ppm) to
non-detectable (ND). The highest levels of TPH as gasoline (3,300 and 440 ppm TPH)
occurred at sampling point B2 at the southern portion of the former tank excavation
(Figure 2). Lower levels of TPH as gasoline were detected at sampling points C2 (120
ppm and ND TPH) and A2 (2.5 to 28 ppm TPH). Low concentrations of TPH as
gasoline were detected at soil sampling points Al, BI, and C1 at the northern portion of
FRE/0A3003602-93 GTF:I
Mr Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02 ,
March 12, 1993
Page 2
the tank excavation. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were detected
primarily at sampling locations A2 and B2. Concentrations of the BTEX compounds are
presented on Table 1.
On November 10, 1992, EMCON Associates supervised the completion of four soil
borings (E-1, E-2, E-3, and E-4) at the site to assess the lateral and vertical extent of
hydrocarbon impacted soils (Figure 1). Two borings (E-2 and E-4) were drilled along the
east and west perimeter of the tank excavation. Boring E-3 was located in the south
central part of the former storage tank area. Boring E-1 was located south of the former
tank storage area beneath the former product island. Soil samples collected from the
following borings and depths were submitted for chemical analysis.
Boring Depth (feet)
E-1 10
E-1 20
E-1 35
E-2 5
E-2 20
E-3 20
E-3 35
E-4 5
E-4 25
E-4 35
Analytical results indicated that hydrocarbon-impacted soils exist at a depth of 20 feet in
soil boring E-1 and at a depth of 5 feet in boring E-2 located directly west of the tank
excavation. Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any of the other soil samples
submitted to the laboratory for chemical analysis.
A February 4, 1993 letter from Mr. Ralph Huey of the City of Bakersfield expressed
concern that boring E-3 had missed a plume of hydrocarbon-impacted soil identified by
soil sample B2, collected during the removal of the underground storage tanks. Mr Huey
also requested additional site characterization to identify the plume.
FRE/OA3003602-93 GTF: I
Mr Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
March 12, 1993
Page 3
SCOPE OF WORK
EMCON proposes to drill and sample a maximum of two additional borings (E-5 and E-
6) through the former underground storage tank cavity to further assess the vertical extent
of impacted soil (Figure 1). Boring E-3, completed during the previous drilling program,
apparently failed to intersect the area of impacted soil as defined by analytical results
from soil sample B2. Therefore, borings E-5 and E-6 will be located in the vicinity of
sampling location B2 (Figure 1). The borings will be constructed on a triangular pattern
with the previous boring E-3 and borings E-5, and E-6 located at the apexes of the
triangle. This pattern should provide sufficient coverage of the area surrounding B2 such
that one of the borings should intersect any vertical plume associated with B2. Boring
E-5, which will be completed fin'st, will be located as close as possible to the former
sampling location B2. If field screening techniques (i.e. headspace analysis and field
observations of soils) conducted during completion of E-5 indicate the presence of
hydrocarbon-impacted soils at a depth of 20 feet BG and greater, it will be assumed that
soil samples collected from this boring will be adequate to characterize the vertical extent
of impacted soil and boring E-6 will not be drilled.
The borings will be completed using hollow-stem auger drilling equipment and will be
advanced until two consecutive soil samples collected at 5-foot intervals have
photoionization detector readings less than 50 ppm or to the maximum capability of the
drilling equipment. It is anticipated that each boring will be drilled to a depth of 40 feet
BG. Soil samples will be submitted for chemical analysis at depths of 20, 35, and 40 feet
BG. If either boring is advanced past a depth of 40 feet, additional soil samples will be
retained for chemical analysis at depth intervals not greater than 15 feet and an additional
soil sample collected from the bottom of the boring will also be submitted for chemical
analysis. These sampling intervals may be modified based on headspace analysis or the
presence of distinct lithologic boundaries. Soil samples submitted to the laboratory will
be analyzed for gasoline range TPH, BTEX, and organic lead by the analyses described
in the workplan.
FRE/0A3003602-93 GTF:I
Mr Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
March 12, 1993
Page 4
SCHEDULE
EMCON is prepared to begin field work two weeks after approval of this workplan by
Southland and the City of Bakersfield. Field work is expected to expected to require one
day. A final report summarizing the laboratory analyses and site conditions will be issued
approximately two weeks after receipt of the laboratory analyses.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this workplan, please contact EMCON
at (209) 275-4968.
Sincerely,
EMCON Associates
George Forsythe /'v (_ Steven R. Strait, C.E.G.
Staff Geologist Group Manager, Geology
Attachment: Table 1
Figure 1
FRE/0A3003602-93 GTF:I
Table 1
Summary of Tank Excavation Analytical Results
(milligrams/kilogram[ppm])
I
Sample I Depth (ft) TPH as Ethyl- Total
DesignationI gasoline Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes
A1 14 0.3 ND ND ND 0.(X)6
A1 18 0.8 ND ND 0.008 0.019
A2 13 2.5 0.006 0.013 ND 0.048
A2 17 27 ND ND ND 2.8
BI 14 ND ND ND ND ND
BI 18 ND ND ND 4.2 ND
B2 13 · 440 0.92 12 38 54
B2 17 3,300 14 74 ND 310
C 1 14 0.2 ND ND ND 0.011
C1 18 0.7 ND ND ND 0.013
C2 13 120 ND 0.64 ND 6.1
C2 17 ND ND ND ND ND
FRF_d0A3003602-93 GTF: 1
~ 7-ELEVEN STORE I:~ PRINTING
~ FORMER UNDERGROUND S~ 'IN, KS
~LU~ 8~
~P~NATION o ~o ~
E-3
X A~D ~L ~1~
E-5
O ~D ~L ~1~ ~T~N
~~otes 23~ ~u~s St. ~m~m. ~
~4ECT
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
February 4, 1993
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON . BAKERSFIELD, 9330i
FIRE CHIEF ' 326-3911
The Southland Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, CA 94566
RE: Site Assessment for 7-Eleven Store #23446
Dear Mr. Good:
Upon review of the Site Assessment submitted by EMCON associates for your facility
located at 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, CA, we find additional information is
necessary to define the extent of the plume.
Boring E-3'was taken in close proximity to the original sample B-2 however, this boring
must have missed the plume entirely. Values of 3,300 ppm (TPH) detected at 17 feet
below grade should have resulted in some detectible results at 20 feet. Boring E-3
however, shows non-detectible results at 20 feet and 35 feet. I believe this is due to the
medium and course sand and gravel in this location, which may have resulted in vertical
migration with very little horizontal spread at the depths tested.
In any case further assessment must be completed to define the vertical extent of the
contamination originally detected in sample B-2. Please submit a work plan for this
additional assessment to this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
If you have any questions please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely yours, ~
'Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/ed
cc: EMCON
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
February 4, 1993
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
The Southland Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite.310
Pleasanton, CA 945~¢ / /
RE: Site Assessment fo~ 7-Eleven Store #23446
Dear Mr. Good:
Upon review of the Site Assessment submitted by EMCON associates for your facility
located at 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, CA, we find additional information is
necessary to define the extent of the plume.
Boring E-3 was taken in close proximity to the original sample B-2 however, this boring
must have missed the plume entirely. Values of 3,300 ppm (TPH) detected at 17 feet
below grade should have resulted in some detectible results at 20 feet. Boring E-3
however, shows non-detectible results at 20 feet and 35 feet. I believe this is due to the
medium and course sand and gravel in this location, which may have resulted in vertical
migration with very little horizontal spread at the depths tested.
In any case further assessment must be completed to define the vertical extent of the
contamination originally detected in sample B-2. Please submit a work plan for this
additional assessment to this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
If you have any questions please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely yours, ~
'Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/ed
cc: EMCON
· TRANSMITTAL,
January 29, 1993
DATE:
PROJECT: 0A30-036,02
Emcofl
ASSOCIATES
TO:
Mr. R~IDh ~uey RECEIVED
City of Bakersfield fEB 0 I 1995,
Hazardous Materials Division
2130 "G" Street HAZ, MAI, DiV.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
WE ARE SENDING:
[( UANT,Wl IDESCR,PT, O. I
1 Copy of site asse.~m~nt fnr 7-P.l~vmn mtore # 23446 located
at 2300 Co]umhu.~ .q~r~e~; ~kers~ie!d~ ~_~_
FOR YOU,;
Use l_Z_l Regular Mail
Approval I--I Federal Express
Review/Comments ~ UPS
Information ~ Courier
Other I I Other
Comments: If you have any c~]~_.~inn~ nr mnmme_~tS~ please call k~MCON
at
CC:
~orge FoX'he
4233 West Sierra Madre Ave., Suite 109, Fresno, CA 93722 (209) 275-4968 FAX (209) 275-5181
Form C-4 Rev. 11/90
ORIGINAL-Recipient YELLOW-Emcon File PINK-Originator
~ January 29, 1993
E~CO~ Project 0A30-036.02
ASSOCIATES
Consultants in Wastes
Management and
Environmental Control
Mr. Ralph Huey
City of Bakersfield
Hazardous Materials Division
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Results of site assessment at 7-Eleven Store//23446,
2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr Huey:
On behalf of The Southland Corporation (Southland) EMCON Associates (EMCON)
presents this report describing the results of the site assessment performed at 7-Eleven
Store #23446, at 2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California. Field activities, which
consisted of the completion of four soil borings, were conducted on November 10, 1992.
The borings were completed through and along the perimeter of the former underground
fuel storage tank cavity. During drilling and soil sampling activities, soil samples were
collected from each boring at selected soil horizons and submitted to a state-certified
laboratory for chemical analysis. The results of the boring program and the chemical
analyses are evaluated in the report and presented in their entirety in Appendices A and
B.
EMCON appreciates your cooperation on this project. If you have any questions or
comments regarding this report, please contact EMCON at (209) 275-4968
Sincerely,
EMCON Associates
George T. Forsythe Steven R. Strait, R.G.
Staff Geologist Group Manager, Geology
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109, Fresno, California 93722, (209) 275-4968, FAX (209) 275-5181
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SITE ASSESSMENT
7-ELEVEN STORE #23446
On November 10, 1992, EMCON Associates supervised the completion of
four soil borings (E-l, E-2, E-3, and E-4) at 7-Eleven Store #23446, at
2300 Columbus Street in Bakersfield, California. The borings were
completed to assess the vertical and lateral extent of hydrocarbon-
impacted soils identified during the underground storage tank removal
assessment conducted on April 15, 1992. Two borings (E-2 and E-4)
were drilled along the east and west perimeter of the tank excavation.
Analytical data from soil samples collected 'during the tank excavation
indicated that the majority of hydrocarbon impacted soils occurred at the
southern end of the former tank area. Therefore, boring E-3 was located
in the south central part of the former storage tank area. Boring E-1 was
located south of the former tank storage area beneath the former product
island.
Analytical results indicated that hydrocarbon-ir'~pacted soils exist at a
depth of 20 feet in soil boring E-1 and at a depth of 5 feet in boring E-2
located directly west of the tank excavation. Headspace analyses,
conducted during field ope~rations on soil samples collected from borings
· E-1 and E-3 indicated the presence of hydrocarbon vapors to a depth of
approximately 35 to 40 feet, however, chemical analyses conducted on
soil samples collected at 30 and 35 feet in boring E-1 and 20 and 35 feet
in boring E-3 indicated that no petroleum hydrocarbon constituents existed
at or above the method detection limit.
Based on the results of this investigation and the previous tank removal
assessment, the vertical and lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon
impacted soils has been characterized. Based on the vertical extent of
hydrocarbon-impacted soil, it is unlikely that groundwater has been
impacted due to site activities. First encountered groundwater is
estimated to 'be approximately 200 feet below the site.
Analytical data obtained from soil samples collected during the boring
program indicated that hydrocarbon impacted soils existed at two locations
(E-1 at a depth of 20 feet and E-2 at a depth of 5 feet). Reported
constituents at both locations were only slightly above their respective
method detection limits and soil samples collected beneath both of'these
sampling locations contained no detectable concentrations of analyzed
hydrocarbon constituents.
EMCON Associates recommends that no further site assessment or
characterization be performed at thesite for the following reasons:
· Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in only two.soils
samples and detected constituents in these two samples'
occurred at very Iow concentrations
.- Chemical analyses pedormed on soil samples collected
beneath the two locations at which petroleum
hydrocarbons were detected had non-detectable
concentrations of all analyzed constituents
· Given the Iow concentrations at which petroleum
hydrocarbons were detected in the two samples and the
depth to groundwater at the site'of approximately 200
feet, it is extremely unlikely that groundwater could be
impacted by past site activities
PJ 0A30-036.02 2 January 7, 1993
ASSOCIATES
Consultants in wastes
Management and
Environmental Control January 21, 1993
Project 0A30-
036.02
Mr. Bud Good
The Southland Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, CA 94556
Re: Site assessment report for 7-Eleven Store #23446,
2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Good:
The results of recent ddlling and soil sampling for the site assessment at
7-Eleven Store #23446 at 2300 Columbus Street in Bakersfield, California
(Figure 1) are presented in this report. This work was performed by
EMCON Associates (EMCON) at the'request of The Southland
Corporation (Southland) to assess the vertical and lateral extent of
hydrocarbon-impacted soils at the site. The work was conducted in
accordance with the City of Bakersfield guidelines and the Tri-Regional
Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and
Investigation of Underground Tank Sites, August 10, 1990.
LIMITATIONS
The services described in this report were performed consistent with
generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. These services were
pedormed consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is
solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted.
Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party's sole risk.
Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to
conditions existing when services were performed and are intended only
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109, Fresno, California 93722, (209) 275-4968, FAX (209) 275-5181
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 2
for the clien{, purposes, locations, time frames, and project parameters
indicated. We are not responsible for the impacts of any changes in
environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to
pedormance of services. We do not warrant the accuracy of information
supplied by others, nor the use of segregated portions of this report.
BA~CKGROUND
On April 15, 1992, three 10,000-gallon underground fuel storage tanks,
designated A, B, and C, were removed at the site. The tanks were of
single-wall steel construction, 8 feet in diameter, and 28 feet in length.
The tanks had product histories of leaded and unleaded gasoline. The
tops of the tanks were approximately 4 feet'below grade (BG). The tank
bottoms were approximately 12 feet BG.' The tanks were in fair condition
upon removal, with some rust on the lower surfaces, 'but no significant
pitting. No holes were noted in the tanks. Several small areas of
discolored soil and strong product odors were noted in the bottom of the
excavation, beneath the former dispenser island location. On Apdl 16,
1992, under the direction of Mr. Joseph Dunwoody of the Bakersfield City
Fire Department, :Hazardous Materials Division, EMCON field personnel
collected soil samples Al, A2, B1, B2, Cl, and C2 from native soil at
depths of approximately 2 feet and 6 feet below each end of the former
underground tanks (Figure 2). The tank cavity was backfilled on April 16,
1992 with soil excavated from the tank pit and imported fill.
The results of the soil analyses are summarized on Table 1. Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline ranged from 31300 parts per
million (ppm) to non-detectable (ND). The highest levels of TPH as
gasoline (3,300 and 440 ppm TPH) occurred at sampling point B2 at the
southern portion of the former tank excavation (Figure 2). Lower levels of
TPH as gasoline were detected at sampling points C2 (120 ppm and ND
TPH) and A2 (2.5 to 28 ppm TPH). Low concentrations of TPH as
gasoline were detected at soil sampling points Al, B1, and Cl at the
northern portion of the tank excavation. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
and xylenes (BTEX) were detected primarily at sampling locations A2 and
B2. Concentrations of the BTEX compounds are presented on Table 1.
The site is on the Kern River Formation which consists largely of poorly
bedded and loosely consolidated sandstone and conglomerate (Graham
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 3
et al. 1988)1. According to the Kern County Water Agency (1991)2, only
two water wells exist within approximately one mile of the site. These
include wells into the unconfined aquifer of the Kern River Formation at
the southeast corner of Section 8 and northeast corner of Section 20 of
Township 29 South and Range 28 East.
According to Kern County Water Agency (ibid.), the depth to ground water
at the site is approximately 200 feet. The regional groundwater flow is to
the southwest.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On November 10, 1992, EMCON supervised the completion of four soil
bodngs (E-l, E-2, E-3, and E-4) at the subject site using a hollow-stem
auger drilling rig. Boring E-1 was completed beneath the former pump
island. Borings E-2 and E-4 were completed along the eastern and
western boundaries of the former tank excavation and boring E-3 was
completed through the approximate south central region of.the former tank
area. Prior to beginning each boring, the drilling augers, drilling bit, and
the down-the-hole hammer were steam cleaned.
Soil sampling was attempted at 5-foot intervals from the surface to the
total depth of the boring, but the nature of the materials encountered
prevented collection of samples at some 5-foot intervals. A soil sample
was not collected in bodng E-3 at 5 feet due to the obvious presence of fill
material within the former underground tank excavation. The soil.samples
were collected by advancing a modified California split-spoon sampler
equipped with brass liners a maximum of 18-inches into the relatively
undisturbed soil below the lead auger. Prior to eaCh sampling event the
split-spoon sampler was washed in a solution of trisodium phosphate and
double rinsed in fresh water. Soil samples collected for chemical analysis
were sealed with Teflon® tape and plastic end caps. After sealing the
liners, they were labeled and placed in a cooler containing frozen gel
packs which maintained the internal cooler temperature at approximately 4
degrees Celsius. Appropriate chain-of-custody documentation, which is
included in Attachment B, was initiated after sampling and accompanied
the analytical samples to the laboratory. Soils encountered during drilling
1Graham, S.A., Carroll, A.R., and Miller, G.E. 1988. Kern River Formation as a
Recorder of Uplift and Glaciation of the Southern Sierra Nevada Uplift. Studies of the
Geology of the San Joaquin:Pacific Basin. Section S.E.P.M., Vol. 60, pp. 319-331.
2Kern County Water Agency. 199.1. Water Supply Report 1990. p. 70'.
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 4
and sampling operations were classified in accordance with the Unified
Soil Classification System by a qualified geologist working under the direct
supervision of a California-registered geologist. Detailed boring logs are
presented in Attachment 1.
Headspace analyses of the soil samples were performed in the field uSing
a photoionization detector (PID) to test for the presence of volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons: Approximately 200 to 300 grams of soil from
each sampled interval was placed in a glass jar. The jar was sealed .with
aluminum foil and after approximately 20 minutes, the Teflon® tip of the
PID was inserted through the aluminum foil. The highest reading indicated
by the PID was then recorded. The PID used was a Photovac MicroTIPTM
IS-3000 with detection limits of 0.1 to 2,000 parts per million (ppm) for
volatile organic compounds.
The Soil borings were abandoned by backfilling with a sand-cement grout
containing 4% bentonite to approximately 4 inches BG. After the sand-
cement grout had hardened, the bOring was capped to grade by placing
asphalt "cold patch" over the grout.
Soils generated during drilling were stockpiled on plastic sheeting located
on the west side of the building containing the 7-Eleven store. Upon
completion of drilling activities, four soil samples were collected from
different areas of the soil stockpile by pushing brass rings into the
stockpile. In order to obtain a representative sample of the stockpile these
samples were later composited by the laboratory into one sample prior to
chemical analysis. The stockpile was then covered with plastic sheeting
which was secured to prevent removal by wind. Kern Environmental
Services (KES) removed the soils generated during the assessment and
hauled them to an appropriate disposal facility.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Twelve soil samples collected from the four borings were submitted to the
laboratory for chemical analysis. Soils samples collected at depths of 10,
20, and 35 feet in borings E-1 were selected for chemical analysis based
on headspace analysis. Soil samples collected at depths of 5 and 20 feet
in boring E-2 were selected for chemical analysis based on a 15 foot
interval. Soil samples collected from E-3 at depths of 20 and 35 feet were
selected for chemical analysis based on headspace analysis and the
availability of sufficient sample material. Soil samples collected from
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 5
bodng E-4 at depths of 5, 25, and 35 feet were selected for chemical
analysis based on headspace analysis and the availability of sufficient
sample. Four sample rings collected from the soil stockpile were also
submitted to laboratory and composited by the laboratory before analysis.
Appropriate chain-of-custody documentation was maintained and is
included with the Certified Analytical Reports (Attachment 2).
The soil Samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline and organic lead.
using the California. Department of Health Services analytical methods
recommended in the May, 1988 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT)
Manual, and for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX)
using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8020.
FINDINGS
Analytical Results
All chemical analyses were performed by Columbia Analytical Services
which is a state-certified laboratory. Certified Analytical Reports (CARs)
from chemical analysis of the soil samples are presented in Attachment 2.
The results of the chemical analyses are discussed below.
Total xylenes were detected in the soil sample collected from boring E-1 at
a depth of 20 feet at a concentration of 0.016 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg).
No constituents were detected in any of the other samples collected from
boring E-1.
Several constituents were detected in the sample collected from boring E-
2 at a depth of 5 feet. High analyte concentrations in this sample required
methanol extraction resulting in elevated Method Reporting Limits (MRLs).
Benzene and ethylbenzene were detected at concentrations of 0.1 mg/kg
and 0.2 mg/kg respectively. TPH as gasoline was detected at a
concentration of 16 mg/kg. Organic lead was detected at a concentration
of 2.2 mg/kg. Neither toluene or total xylenes were detected at the
elevated MRL of 0.1 mg/kg. No constituents were detected in any of the
other soil samples collected from boring E-2.
No constituents were detected at or above the .method detection limit in
any of the samples analyzed from borings E-3 and E-4.
The composite sample collected from the soil stockpile had reported
concentrations of xylenes of 0.14 mg/kg and TPH as gasoline of 3.9
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 6
mg/kg. Neither benzene, ethylbenzene, or toluene were detected at the
elevated MRL of 0.1 mg/kg.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
The goal of a quality assurance program is to control and ascertain the
quality of the data generated from a program. The quality assurance
parameters used to attain this goal are defined below.
· Representativeness - a measure of how a sample or
_ group of samples reflects the characteristics of the
medium at the sampling point. Also includes how well the
sampling point represents the actual parameter variations
which are under study.
· Comparability- the confidence with which one data set
can be compared with another.
· Accuracy- the degree of agreement of a measurement
with an accepted reference or true value.
· Precision a measure of mutual agreemen! among
individual measurements of the same property, usually
under prescribed similar conditions. Usually expressed in
terms of the relative percent difference (RPD).
The representativeness of data produced during the site characterization
program was maintained by the use of standard procedures for sampling,
analysis and data evaluation.
Data comparability was maintained by the use of standard EPA analytical
methods, and reporting of the data in standard units. All results of organic
constituents were reported in mg/kg.
The accuracy of analytical data was evaluated by testing method blanks
and measuring the recovery of surrogate compounds and matrix spike
(MS) compounds introduced into the sample immediately before
extraction. Surrogate compoqnds wer, e used for the analysis of BTEX and
TPH as gasoline and matrix spike compounds were used in the analysis of
BTEX, TPH as gasoline, and organic lead.
Recoveries of all surrogate compounds were within the laboratory's
acceptance criteria. MS.and MS duplicate (MSD) compounds for BTEX
and TPH as gasoline analyses were introduced into sample E-4 collected
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
'January 21, 1993
Page 7
at 25 feet BG. The MS and MSD duplicate for organic lead was
introduced into sample E-1 collected at 10 feet BG. The MS and MSD
recoveries for all compounds were also within the laboratory's acceptance
criteria and no constituents were detected in any of the form method
blanks.
The precision of analytical data was evaluated by the comparison of MS
and MSD recoveries using RPD according to the following formula:
RPD: I Ms- MSDI x 100
0.5(MS + MSD)
where RPD = percent relative percent difference
I I = absolute value
RPDs for the soil analyses were within the laboratory's acceptance criteria.
Therefore, the analytical precision of the soil data is judged to be of
acceptable quality.
Subsurface Conditions
The soils encountered during drilling Consisted predominantly of gravelly
sand, sandy gravel, and sand with relatively minor amounts of silty sand
and sandy clay. The gravelly sand, sandy gravel, and sand units appear
to be interbedded, laterally discontinuous, and have gradational contacts
into one another.
Analytical data indicates that the only .borings to encounter hydrocarbon
impacted soils were E-1 and E-2. Boring E-l, drilled beneath the former
product island had detectable concentrations of total xylenes in the sample
collected at 20 feet. Soil samples collected from boring E-1 at 30 and 35
feet had no detectable concentrations of the analyzed constituents. Soil
samples B2 at 13 feet BG and B2 at 17 feet BG, collected during the
underground tank removal in the vicinity of E-1 had the largest detected
concentrations of BTEX and TPH as gasoline. Boring E-2 had detectable
concentrations of benzene, ethylbenzene, organic lead and TPH as
gasoline at a depth of 5 feet. Soil samples collected from boring E-2 at 20
and 35 feet BG had no detectable concentrations of the analyzed
constituents. Headspace analyses performed on soils during completion
of borings E-1 and E-3 indicated the possibility of slight hydrocarbon
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 8
impact to soils in this area but analytical data did not support this
observation. This apparent anomaly may be explained by assuming that
the petroleum'hydrocarbons occur predominantly in the vapor phase and
very little or no product is actually adsorbed on soil surfaces.
The above listed observations indicate that the majority of hydrocarbon
impacted soils are located in the area of the southern portion of the former
underground tanks and beneath the former product, island. Minor amounts
of impacted soils also occur in near surface soils along the western margin
of the former tank area. Additionally, the extent of hydrocarbon impacted
soils appears to be confined to the upper 25 feet or less of soils.
Based on the results of this investigation and the previous tank removal
assessment, the vertical and lateral extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soils
in the vicinity of the former underground storage tanks has been
characterized. The lateral extent appears to be confined within the limits
of borings E-1 and E-2, and the sample points Al, A2, B2, C1, and C2
collected during the tank removal assessment (Figure 2). The vertical
extent is apparently confined between depths of 5 and approximately 25
feet as detected in borings E-2 and E-1 respectively. Because there were
no visible holes noted during inspection of the underground storage tanks
after they were removed, it is likely that the contamination of the soils at
the site was caused by periodic spillage during filling of the tanks and/or
leak(s) associated with former product piping.
Based on the apparent vertical extent of detectable petroleum
hydrocarbons, the Iow concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons
observed in soils beneath the former underground storage tanks, and an
estimated depth to groundwater of approximately 200 feet, it is unlikely
that groundwater has been impacted from site activities.
CONCLUSIONS
During completion of borings E-1 through E-4, field inspection of soils and
PID readings indicated that hydrocarbons products associated with the
former underground tanks might have impacted soils to a depth of 30 to 35
feet in borings E-1 and E-3 and to a depth of 5 feet in boring E-2.
Analytical data for soil samples collected during the boring program
indicated that the only impacted soils encountered were in borings E-1 at
20 feet and E-2 at 5 feet. In soil samples collected during the removal of
the underground storage tanks, the highest detected concentrations of
analyzed constituents occurred at sampling location B2, located at the
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
January 21, 1993
Page 9
southern end of the former tank area, at 13 feet and 17 feet BG.
Therefore, analytical data indicates that the vertical and horizontal extent
of hydrocarbon impacted soils has been defined. The area of impacted
soils occurs within the boring locations E-1 and E-2 and the 'sampling
locations Al, A2, B2, C1, and C2, collected dudng the tank removal
assessment (Figure 2). Analytical data from soil samples collected from
bodng E-1 at 30 and 35 feet and from boring E-2 at 20 and 35 feet were
below method detection limits for all analyzed constituents, indiCating that
the vertical extent of impacted soils has been identified and is confined to
approximately 25 feet BG.
Based on the vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil, it is unlikely
that ground water has been impacted due to site activities. First
encountered ground water is estimated to be approximately 200 feet
below the site.
RECOMMENDATIONS
EMCON Associates recommends that no further site assessment or
characterization be performed at the site for the following reasons:
· Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in only two soils
samples and detected constituents in these two samples
occurred at very Iow concentrations
· Chemical analyses performed on soil samples collected
beneath the two locations at which petroleum
hydrocarbons were detected had non-detectable
concentrations of all analyzed constituents
· Given the Iow concentrations at which petroleum
hydrocarbons were detected in the two samples and the
depth to groundwater at the site of approximately 200
feet, it is extremely unlikely that groundwater could be
impacted by past site activities
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide any
additional service, please contact George Forsythe or Steve Strait at (209)
275-4968.
Mr. Bud Good Project 0A30-036.02
Janua~ 21, 1993
Page 10
Very truly yours,
EMCON Associates
sGtea~fr g~e o ~or~iYts I ,e~ ./. //
.Group Manager, RG #4834
GTF/SRS:gtf
Attach me nts:
Table 1 - Summary of Tank Removal Analytical Results
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Site Map
Attachment 1 - Exploratory Boring Log~
Attachment 2 - Certified Analytical Reports
Table 1
Summary of Analytical Results
Sample A1 A1 A2 A2 B1 B1 B2 B2 C1 Cl C2 C2
Depth (ft) 14 18 13 17 14 18 13 17 14 18 13 17
TPH as gas (ppm) 0.3 0.8 2.5 27 ND ND 440 3,300 0.2 0.7 120 ND
Benzene (ppm) ND ND 0.006 ND ND ND 0.92 14 ND ND ND ND
Toluene (ppm) ND ND 0.013 ND ND ND 12 74 ND ND 0.64 ND
Ethylbenzene (ppm) ND 0.008 ND ND ND ' 4.2 38 ND ND ND ND ND
Xylenes (ppm) 0.006 0.019 0.048 2.8 ND ND 54 310 0.011 0.013 6.1 ND
PJ 0A30-036.02 January 21, 1993
~52753
'1/2 1, (MILES)
' ~ NORTH
2300 COLUMBUS ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA
:*ROJEC T NO.I
SITE LOCATION MAP A30-36.02~
7-.ELEVEN STORE PIP PRINTING
m 'FORMER UNDERGR(:XJND SI'ORAC~ TANKS
iCl-I
COLUMBU~ $ !
EXPLANATION o 2o ,~o 6o~r
E-3
· SOIL BORING
X . ATTEMPTED SOIL BORING
B2
· SAMPUNG LOCATIONS DURING UNDERGROUND TANK REMO~L
Attachment 1
EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS
L~ EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS ON
~mcon EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS
Well Details Column
"' " ~ CONCRETE "
~ ~ ~3ENTONIIE-CEMENT GROUT ,OR
'::' NEAT CEMENT GROUT SURFACE SEAL
II BENTONITE
!.'.: ': :~
?.:~,.~.:! FI LTER PACK
Sam;le Column '
BAG/BULK SAMPLES
FIVE-FOOT SPL'IT BARREL SAMPLER (CONTINUOUS SAMPLER
MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SPLIT SPOON
OTHER SAMPLERS (SEE REMARKS FOR TYPE AND SIZE)
PITCHER BARREL
ROCK CORE (SEE REMARKS FOR TYPE AND SrZE)
SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER (.Z" OD
MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLSi TYPICAL SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
G~V Will graded grMII Qr gravli-sane misturlI, htlll ~ ~ flnll
- ~ GRAVELS
~.~ (M~I than I/2 of
~ ~ ~C Clayey ~ravlls, gr~el-s~clay mixtures
U ~ (M~I then 1/2 of
~ M L Inor~amc Illll Id very rifle sands, r~l flour, silty ~ ClOy~
'~;e SILTS 5 CLAY~ I~N toads ~ cloy~ still with shrill ~aiticity
O0 EL ( ~0 sandy clayl, I~lly clayl, lee cl~l
~ ~ OL Or.mc slits and ~e~,c s, lty clays of Iow ~lell~ity
"'" ,,. i ,-....-,,..
c_ MH
Z ~: CH I~gamc clays of hilh pl~fmity, fat clays
G OH
CLASSIFICATION CHART
(Un,lied Soil ClOllificahofl Syltlm)
U. S $1anaara Gr~m S~ze
Sieve S~ze m Mdhmeters C
BOULDERS AOove 12" A~ove ]05
COBBLES 12" ,o 3" 305 to 762
GRAVEL 3' to No. 4 76.2 to 4.76
coarse 3" to ~4' 76.2 lo 19.1
SAND NO 4 ~0 NO. 20C 4.76 to ~074 o ,u zo ~ ,o ~o ~ ~o ,o ~o ,oo
coarse No. 4 lo ND.lO 476 lo ~.00 LIQUIO LIMIT
meal,urn N=IO ~0 NO. 40 z.oo ,o o. 4zo PLASTICITY CHART
fine_ Ne. 40 to N=2~ Q420 to 0074
SlbT ~ CLAY ~et~ No.~00 ~etow 0074
GRA N SIZE CHART
M[THOD OF SOI C ASSIFICATiON
mcon
~T
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-I
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 1 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
PID Penetro-! .tionP°Cke~ Penetra--~/_~f'~ (/) ~ LITHO- WELL
meter0~--~u' u' ~[~ ~ ~ COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft) 09
ASPHALT
FII.I.: GRAVEL
SAND (SP), dark yellowish brown (10YR, 4/4);
- trace fines; 30-40% fine-grained sand; 40-50%
medium-grained sand 5-10% coarse-grained
sand; u'ace gravel to 1-inch diameter; damp; no
]]]]1 product odor; no staining.
274 38 -5 @5 feet: black (10YR, 2/1); dense; damp;
moderate product odor; slxong discoloration.
354 37 - 10 iiii @ 10 feet: dark gray (10YR, 2/1); 10-20%
fine-grained sand; 50-60% medium-grained
sand; 10-15% coarse-grained sand; trace-5%
gravel to 0.75-inch diameter; dense; damp;
slight to moderate product odor; moderate
- product staining.
38.7 50 - 15 i . . . @15 feet: gray, (10YR, 6/1); very dense.
for
6
20
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified:Califomia split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-I
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 2 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
PID Pocke~ Penetra--~ ~~ (~ ~ LITHO- WELL
Penetro-
tion
meter~ u.-- u. ~ ~ ~ COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft} 09
236 48 .... @20 feet: light yellowish brown (10YR, 6/4); trace
decomposed granitic clasts to 1-inch diameter;
o no visible staining:
84.7 50 - 25 i i i '. @25 feet: dark yellowish brown (10YR, 4/4);
for 10-20% fine-grained sand; 30-40%
6 medium-grained sand; 20-30% coarse-grained
sand; 5-10% gravel to 1-inch diameter; very
dense; damp; no visible staining.
! SILTY SAND (SM), yellowish brown (10YR, 5/6);
30-40% low to non-plastic fines; 50-60%
fine-grained sand; trace medium-grained sand;
114 55 - 30/ii i i i,i trace coarse-grained sand; very dense; damp; no
product odor; no visible staining.
SAND (SP), light yellowish brown (10YR, 6/4);
trace-5% fines; 70-80% fine-grained sand;
10-20% medium-grained sand; trace
coarse-grained sand; trace granitic gravel to
_ 0.9-inch diameter; dense; damp; no product
101 45 staining.
@38 feet: auger returns consist of round to
subround gravel to 2-inch diameter.
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing apProximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-1
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g'23446 PAGE 3 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion~ ~ ~ GRAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIL
(ppm) (~sf)
.~. Note: Very little auger returns from 38 to 40 feet.
.~. Returns are round to subround granitic clasts
· ,. with lesser amounts of quartz and quartzite
-,,- clasts to 3-inches diameter.
AUGER REFUSAL AT 44 FEET. BORING
TERMINATED.
- 45
- 50
- 55
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately. 5-foot intervals using a moddied-Califomia split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-2
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station ~23446 PAGE
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion~ ~ ~ SRAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter ~ ~(~' COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft)
ASPHALT
.,~ ~., FilJ.: GRAVEL
__ SANDY CLAY (CL), olive (5Y, 5/3); medium
__ plasticity fines; 5-10% fine-grained sand;
__ 5-10% medium-grained sand; trace-5%
23.7 50 - 5 1 coarse-grained sand; 5-10%.gravel to 0.5-inch
diameter; damp; hard; slight product odor.
for
6
__
--
-- /
- I"
2.5 50/6 10 ~..~. Note: Insufficient recovery at 10 and 11 feet to
- .~.~'~ collect a sample. Material appears to be mainly
50/6 ! ~. ~-.~.~- ~ ~.gravel to 1.2-inch diameter.
0.1 50 - 151~'==.~' N0te: Driller indicates gravel and cobble material
~-~.9, at 15 feet. Unable to collect a sample.
for ~. ,~-,
6
...... GRAVKI.I.¥ SAND (SP), dark yellowish brown
10.1 ?~".. .... (10YR, 4/4); trace f'mes; 5-10% fine-grained
sand; 20-30% medium-grained sand; 30-40%
-- · · · · coarse-grained sand; 10-20% gravel to 1.5-inch
-- i i i i diameter; damp; no product odor.
20
i REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitmd with brass
liners. Following completion of ddlling activities, the bohng was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentomte to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E~2
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station ~23446 PAGE 2 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
PID Pocke~. Penetra- ~-%~,~ (~ LITHO~ WELL
Penetro- tion ~Z~j ~ ~-~!GRAPHI£ DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter O~-~ ~-i COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/f~) O~
1.7 54 .... SAND (SP), brownish yellow (10YR, 6/6); 5-10%
fmc-grained sand; 40-50% medium-grained
sand; 30-40% coarse-grained sand; trace gravel
to 0.25-inch diameter; very dense; damp;.no
_ product odor; no product staining.
2.8 48 - 25 i i @25 feet: dense
,'~'.~. SANDY GRAVEL (GP), yellowish brown (10YR,
- Z~. 5/6); trace-5% fine-grained sand; 10-20%
,~.~ medium'grained sand; 15-25% coarse-grained -
sand; 45-55% subangular to subround gravel to
2 inches in diameter; very dense; damp; no
~- 30 product staining.
L Note: Unable to collect sample at 30 feet. Driller
~ _~ . thinks sampler refusal is caused by oversized
· material.
SAND (SP), brownish yellow (10YR, 6/6); trace
fines; 20-30% fine-grained sand; 20-30%
3.1 50 - 35 iiii medium-grained sand; 20-30% coarse-grained
for sand; 5-10% gravel to 0.75 inches in diameter;
6 very dense; damp; no product staining.
C- SANDY GRAVEL (GP), described on next
page.
40 ~
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at appmxLmately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES ~
" LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-2
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 3 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
PID Pocket Penetra-~'~..!~_~'~ ~O~.t/.~'~ f GRAPHIC[~ LITHO- DESCRIPTION WELL
Penetro- ~lon ~/~. ~ DETAIl
m. er COL
(ppm) (tsf} (blws/ft ) 09
4.8 80 I ~'~' SANDY GRAVEL (GP), yellowish brown (10YR,
for ~ 5/6); trace-5% f'me-grained sand; I0-20%
8 medium-grained sand; 15-25% coarse-grained
sand; 45-55% subangular to subround gravel to
2 inches in diameter; very dense; damp; no
product staining.
__ BORING TERMINATED AT 40.7 FEET.
- 45
- 50
-- 55
60
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentomte to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
~ ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30.36.02 BORING NO. E-3
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 1 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion gRAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIl
meter ~ ~- COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft)
ASPHALT
Fill.: SAND (SP), yellowish brown (10YR, 5/6);
5 )4:11 trace fines; 3040% t-me-grained sand; 30--40%
medium-grained sand; 10-20% coarse-grained
_ . sand; trace gravel; damp.
@3 feet: strong product staining.
20 - @5 feet: strong product odor.
7 - 10 @ 10 feet: 25-35% fine-grained sand; lrace-5%
gravel to 0.75 inch diameter.
_ SAND (SP), gray (10YR, 5/1); 20-30%
fine-grained sand; 50-60% medium-grained
sand; trace-5% Coarse-grained sand; trace-5%
gravel to 1 inch diameter; dense; damp; slight
to moderate product odor; moderate product
40 _- 15 i . .., staining.
20
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a moddied-Califomia split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentomte to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-3
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 2 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion~ ~ ~-J gRAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter ~]] ~(~' COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft ) ~)
99.5 50 · .... SAND (SP), continues.
for! @20 feet: very dense.
90.8 50 - 25 -I i i i i SAND (SP), pale olive (5Y, 6/3); 40-50%
Cot! : i i i fine-grained sand; 40-50% medium-grained
6 .... sand; trace coarse-grained sand; lxace gravel to
-- · · · · 1.2 inches diameter; gravel is composed of
.... granitic, quartzite, and quartz clasts; very
.... dense; damp; slight product staining.
49.7 50 - 30 -! ....
for ....
-- ~' ~- @32 feet: auger returns are predominately coarse,
- -- ~ ~ round to subround gravel to 3 inches diameter;
-- ~ ~ gravel is granitic with lesser amounts of
-' -- ~ ~' quatrzite and quartz clasts.
22.7 50 - 35 -I SAND (SP), yellowish brown (10YR, 5/4);
for~ trace-5% fines; 70-80% fine-grained sand;
8 -- . . . . 10-15% medium-grained sand; very dense;
-- iiii damp; no product staining.
-- ~_ .... Note: No auger returns from 36 to 38 feet.
· ~- .~. Note: Auger returns from 38 to 40 feet are
,~- ~ predominateiy gravel
~ ~ SANDY GRAVEL (GP), description on next page.
40 ~-
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow~stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
· were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES ~
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-3
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station 823446 PAGE 3 OF 3
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion~ ~ d GRAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter ~ ~ g COLUMN
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft)
8.9 ".~.'=' SANDY GRAVEL (GP), olive brown (2.5Y, 4/3);
~. trace-5% fine-grained sand; trace
.~. medium-grained sand; 5-15% coarse-grained
; -=- sand; 70-80% f'me to coarse gravel; 5-10%
-=- cobbles to 3 inches diameter;, cobbles and
-=- gravel are round to subround granitic,
metamorphic, and quartzite clasts; damp; no
product odor.
AUGER REFUSAL AT 43 FEET. BORING
- 45 TERMINATED.
- 50
- 55
60
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-4
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station g23446 PAGE 1 OF 2
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV. ~650 ft.
Penetro- tion~O~ ~~ ~RAPHIC DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter ~ ~ ~' COLUMN~i
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft) (~
ASPHALT
~ Fll.L: GRAVEL; angular fragments to 1-inch
'~:~t~ .... diameter.
-- ~ i i ~ SAND (SP), dark yellowish brown (10YR, 4/4);
- trace fines; 30-40% frae-grained sand; 30-40%
-- i i i i medium-grained sand; 5-10% coarse-grained
..... sand; 5-10% gravel to 1-inch diameter; damp.
24 - 5 -I .... @5 feet: 20-30 f'me-grained sand; 10-20% gravel
I
to 1-inch diameter, medium dense; damp; no
product odor.
<1 20 - 10-l 2211 @10 feet: yellow, brown(10YR, 5/6); 20-30%
I
fine-grained sand; 40-50% medium-grained
sand; 10-20% come-grained sand; sand is
.... subangular to subround; trace gravel to
-- ' ' ' · 0.4-inch diameter; medium dense; damp; no
- · · . · product odor; no product staining.
<1 27 - 15 1 ....
1
- -- ~'~-~., SANDY GRAVEL (GP), yellowish brown (10YR,
':~"--? ~' -~. 5/4); 10-20% medium-grained sand; 10-20%
~' ~=- coarse-grained sand; 50-60% gravel to
~' '~' 1.5-inches diameter; damp; no product odor.
20 '~'
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped wiuh 8-inch diameter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfilled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentomte to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES ~
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
PROJECT NUMBER A30-36.02 BORING NO. E-4
PROJECT NAME Southland-Station 823446 PAGE 2 OF 2
BY G. Forsythe DATE 11/10/92 SURFACE ELEV.. --650 ft.
Penetro- tion d GRAPEIC! DESCRIPTION DETAIL
meter i ~~' COLUMN'~I
(ppm) (tsf) (blws/ft) '
SANDY GRAVEL (GP), Continues
Note: Sampler refusal at 20 feet.
Note: Sampler refusal at 22 feet.
- Note: Auger returns from 22 to 25 feet are
predominately round to subround gravel to
2.5-inches diameter.
<1 58 - 25 SAND (SP), yellow (10YR, 7/6); 40-50%
fine-grained sand; 40-50% medium-grained
sand; trace com'se-grained sand; sand is arkosic;
trace mica; very dense; damp; no product odor;,
_ no product staining.
<1 50 - 30 @30 feet: trace reddish, decomposed granitic clasts
for ~7 to 0.75-inch diameter.
6
<1 42 - 35 SAND (SP), yellowish brown (10YR, 5/6); trace
fines; 60-70% fine-grained sand; 20-30%
medium-grained sand; trace mica; mouled areas
to 0.3-inch diameter of iron oxide staining;
dense; damp; no product odor; no product
- staining.
BORING TERMINATED AT 36.5 FEET. ,
40
REMARKS
The boring was drilled using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig equipped with 8-inch dimneter augers. Soil samples
were collected at approximately 5-foot intervals using a modified-California split-spoon sampler fitted with brass
liners. Following completion of drilling activities, the boring was backfRled with concrete containing approximately
4% bentonite to 4 inches below grade and capped with asphalt patching material.
ASSOCIATES
December 7, 1992
Vivian Hsiong
EMCON Associates
1921 Ringwood Avenue
San Jose, CA 95131
Re: A30-36.02/Southland-Station No. 23446
Dear Ms. Hsiong:
Enclosed are the results of the soil samples submitted to our lab on November 13,
1992. For your reference, our service request number for this work is SJ92-1436.
All analyses were performed in accordance with the laboratory's quality assurance
pr.ogram.
Please call if you have any questions.
Respec'~fully submitted:
Keoni A. Murphy
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
KAM/kt
Attachment 2
CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL REPORTS
Services,.,.'
December 7, 1992
Vivian Hsiong
EMCON Associates
1921 Ringwood Avenue
San Jose, CA 95131
Re' A30-36.02/Southland-Station No. 23446
Dear Ms. Hsiong'
Enclosed are the results of the soil samples submitted to our lab on November 13,
1992. For your reference, our service reqves'[ number for this work is SJ92-1436.
All analyses were performed' in accordance with the laboratory's quality assurance
program.
Please call if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted'
..; ~,,:,',. t~...,'// .! ~"~ "
Keoni A. Murphy
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
KAM/kt
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.021Southland, //23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/8020/DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-1 10' E-1 20' E-1 30'
Date Analyzed: 11123192 11123192 11/20192 *
Analyte MRL
Benzene 0.005 ND ND ND.
Toluene 0.005 ND ND ND
Ethyl benzene O. O05 N D N D N D
Total Xylenes 0.005 ND 0.01 6 ND
TPH as Gasoline 1 ND ND ND
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
* This sample was part of the analytical batch started on November 20, 1992. However, it was analyzed
after midnight so the actual date analyzed is November 21,. 1992.
·., ....,.-- / : '5~...'. ,
Approved by: ' . Date:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON AssociaTes Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, //23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030~8020/DHS LUFF Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-1 35' E-2 20' E-2 35'
Date Analyzed: 11123192 11120192 * 11120/92 *
Analyte MRL
Benzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Toluene 0.005 ND ND ND
EthyIbenzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 0.005 ND ND ND
TPH as Gasoline 1 ND ND ND
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL~ Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
* This sample was part of the analytical batch started on November 20, 1992. However, it was analyzed
after midnight so the actual date analyzed is November 21, 1992.
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, //23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/8020/DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-3 20' E-3 35' E-4 5'
Date Analyzed: 11/23/92 11/23192 11/20/92 *
Analyte MRL
Benzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Toluene 0.005 ND ND ND
Ethylbenzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 0.005 ND ND ND
TPH as Gasoline 1 ND ND ND
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
* This sample was part of the analytical batch started on November 20, 1992. However it was analyzed
after midnight so the actual date analyzed is November 21, 1992.
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, #23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/80201DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-4 25' E-4 35' Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/20/92 * 11/20/92 * 11/20192
Analyte MRL
Benzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Toluene 0.005 ND ND ND
EthyIbenzene 0.005 ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 0.005 ND ND ND
TPH as Gasoline 1 ND ND ND
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
* This sample was part of the analytical batch started on November 20, 1992. However, it was analyzed
after midnight so the actual date analyzed is November 21, 1992.
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southtand, #23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/80201DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/23/92
Analyte MRL
Benzene 0.005 NO
Toluene 0.005 ND
Ethylbenzene 0.005 ND
Total Xylenes 0.005 ND
TPH as Gasoline 1 ND
TPH Total petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, #23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/8020/DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-2 5' SP-1 Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/23192 11123192 11123192
Analyte MRL *
Benzene 0:02 0.10 ND ND
Toluene 0.04 <;'0.1 °* ND ND
Ethylbenzene 0.04 0.2 ND ND
Total Xylenes 0.04 <0.1 *° 0.14 ND
TPH as Gasoline 2 16. 3.9 ND
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
* Raised MRL due to high analyte concentration requiring methanol extraction.
** Raised MRL due to high analyte concentration requiring sample dilution.
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY' QC RESULTS
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, #23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
QA/QC Report
Surrogate Recovery Summary
BTEX and TPH as Gasoline
EPA Methods 5030/8020/DHS LUFT Method
Sample Name Date Analyzed Percent Recovery
a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene
E-t 10' 11/23/92 74.
E-1 20' 11/23/92 79.
E-1 30' 11/20/92 79.
E-1 35' 11/23/92 86.
E-2 20' 11/20/92 77.
E-2 35' 11/20/92 79.
E-3 20' 11/23/92 80.
E-3 35' 11/23/92 78.
E-4 5' 11/20192 75.
E-4 25' 11/20192 79.
E-4 35' 11/20192 90.
E-4 25' (MS) 11/20/92 90.
E-4 25' (DMS) 11/20/92 92.
Method Blank . 11/20/92 85.
Method Blank 11/23/92 79.
E-2 5' 11/23/92 121.
SP-1 11/23/92 107.
Method Blank 11 i23192 108.
CAS Acceptance Criteria 63-137
TPHTotal Petroleum Hydrocarbons
,,!
Approved by: ~ ,,,-.,.1, . . Date:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QA/QC Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/13/92
Project: A30-36.02/Southland, #23446 Work Order No.: SJ92-1436
Sample Matrix: Soil
Matrix Spike Summary
BTE
EPA Methods 5030/8020
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name: E-4 25'
Date Analyzed: 11/20/92
Percent Recovery
CAS
Spike Sample Spike Result Acceptance
Analyte Level Result MS DMS MS DMS Criteria
Benzene 0.050 ND 0.047 0.048 94. 96. 39-150
Toluene 0.050 ND 0.047 0;047 94. 94. 46-148
Ethylbenzene 0.050 ND 0.046 0.046 92. 92. 32-160
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
APPENDIX B
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
S~m~le I~tormallon Bo!!le.~nlormallop Lab Inior~all°n " Chain ol Custody DocumenlaHon,
Sample ID Lab ID Para~elers N0. Ty~ Pres. Fill. Lab ' " PO ~ sampl~ Dale'" ~c'd By Dale Com~nls Rec'~ By Dale ICommen~,
~ ~ ....
~'~ ~ ....
2o~ ~ ,,,
~ ~pledBy d_ ~ R," Relinquished By Relinquished By
·~~pre~nlalive~ (.__..~._( /~ · ~ - "/,, lc" ':- Received B~,b~ Received By
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
~ample Inlormatlon Bottle Inlormatlon Lab Inlormalion Chain 0i C~stody Documentation
Sample ID Lab iD Pa~amelers No. Ty~ P~es.' Fill Lab, " PO ~ Sampler Dale Rec'd By ' Dale Com~nls Rec'd ~y Dale Commenls
~mpled Byx /, R~inquishe~y ~. Relinquished By Relinquished By
Labora~ry Repreenlalive R{ce~ By-. , ~' ,, Rec i~ By ...~, , ~ Received By
December 2, 1992
TOm Kinney
EMCON Associates
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109
Fresno, CA 93722
Re: Southland - Station #23'!'!.6/Project #A30-36.02/SJ921436
Dear Tom:
Enclosed are the results of the samples submitted to our laboratory on November 14,
1992. For your reference, these analyses have been assigned our work order number
K927229C.
Four subsamples of Sample SP-1 were composited into a single sample by combining
75 g of each canister and mixing prior to weighing for analysis.' The composite was
prepared on November 17, 1992.
All analyses were performed in accordance with our laboratory's quality assurance
program. Reproduction of reports is allowed only in whole, not in part. Results apply
only to the samples analyzed.
Please call if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Project Chemist
JW/akn
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/14/92
Project: Southland - Station #23446/#A30-36.02 Work Order No.: K927229C
Sample Matrix: Soil
Organic Lead
California DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name Lab Code MRL Result
. E-1 10' K7229-1 0.5 ND
E-1 20' K7229-2 0.5 ND
E-1 30' K7229-3 ,0.5 ND
E-1 35' K7229-4 0.5 ND
E-2 5' K7229-5 0.5 2.2
E-2 20' K7229-6 0.5 ND
E-2 35' K7229-7 0.5 ND
E-3 20' K7229-8 0.5 ND
E-3.35' K7229-9 0.5 ND
E-4 5' K7229-10 0.5 ND
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
Approved b --~ r .,~ Date
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/14/92
Project: Southland - Station #23446/#A30-36.02 Work Order No.: K927229C
Sample Matrix: Soil
Organic Lead
California DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
Sample Name Lab Code MRL Result
E-4 25' K7229-11 0.5 ND
E-4 35' K7229-12 0.5 ND
SP-1 K7229-13 0.5 ND
Method Blank K7229-MB 0.5 ND
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
by~-~ c _ Date /Z ~_.- .
Approved
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY QC RESULTS
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QA/QC Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/14/92
Project: Southland - Station #23446/#A30-36.02 Work Order No.: K927229C
Sample Matrix: Soil
Matrix Spike Summary
Organic Lead
California DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
CAS
Percent
Spiked Recovery
Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance
Sample Name Lab Code MRL Level Result Result Recovery Criteria
E-1 10' K7229-1 0.5 7.8 ND 8.0 103 60-130
MRL. Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QA/QC Report
Client: EMCON Associates Date Received: 11/14/92
Project: Southland - Station #23446/#A30-36.02 Work Order No.: K927229C
Sample Matrix: Soil
Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary
Organic Lead
California DHS LUFT Method
mg/Kg (ppm)
As Received Basis
CAS
Duplicate Percent
Spiked Recovery
Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance
Sample Name Lab Code MRL Level Result Result Recovery Criteria
E-1 10' K7229-1 0.5 7.8 ND · 8.1 104 60-130
MRL Method Reporting Limit
ND None Detected at or above the method reporting limit
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FiRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY October 12, 19 92 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
ACTING FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Emcon Associates
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109
Fresno, CA 93722
Attn: Steven Straight
RE: Site assessment 'work plan for the Southland Station
923446 facility located at 2300 Columbus Street,
Bakersfield, CA.
Dear Mr. Straight,
This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated
address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days
notice prior to the commencement of work.
Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under
direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unless
previously approved.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Joe A. Dunwoody
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON ) October 12, 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Emcon Associates
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109
Fresno, CA 93722
Attn: Steven Straight
RE: Site assessment work plan for the Southland Station
#23446 facility located at 2300 Columbus Street,
.Bakersfield, CA.
Dear Mr. Straight,
This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated
address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days
notice pri'or to the commencement of work.
Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under
direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unless
previously approved.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Si, ncerel~,
Joe A. Dunwoody
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
ASSOC ATES
Consu,a. ts ~. Waste. September 4, 1992
Management and
Environmental Control Project A30-35.02
Mr. Joseph .Dunwoody
Hazardous Materials Division
Bakersfield City Fire Department
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Workplan for site assessment at Southland Station #23446,
2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Dunwoody:
EMCON Associates (EMCON) on behalf of The Southland Corporation
(Southland), is submitting this workplan for a site assessment at the
above-referenced site. This workplan was prepared in response to a May
27, 1992 letter from the City of Bakersfield requiring assessment of the
vertical and horizontal extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil.
If you have any comments or questions regarding this workplan, please
contact EMCON at (209) 275-4968.
Very truly yours,
EMCON Associates
Steven R. Strait, C.E.G.
Group Manager, Geology
SRS:csr
Enclosures
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109, Fresno, California 93722, (209) 275-4968, FAX (209) 275-5181
EI11¢0
A$$OOIATE$
Oo,s.,ta.,s ,. w.~,., September 4, 1992
Management and
A30-36.02
Environmental ~ntrol Frojem
Mr. Bud Good
The South and Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5280 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Plea~anton, CA 94566
Re: Workplan for site assessment at Southland Station #23446,
2300 Columbus Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Good:
EMCON Associates (EMCON) presents this workplan for a site
assessment at Southland Station #23446 at 2300 Columbus Street in
Bakersfield, California (Figure 1)in response to a May 27. 1992 letter from
the City of Bakersfield requiring assessment of the vertical and horizontal
extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil. This workplan was prepared in
accoldance with City of Bakersfield guidelines and Tri-Regional Board
Staffl Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of
Underground Storage Tanks.
BA( KGROUND
On 3ril 15, 1992, three 10,000-gallon underground fuel storage tanks,
designated A, B, and C, were removed at the site. The tanks were of
singlE!-wall steel construction, 8 feet in diameter, and 28 feet in length.
The tanks had product histories of leaded and unleaded gasoline. The
I ,
tops of the tanks were approximately 4 feet below ground. The tank
I .
bottoms were approximately 12 feet below ground. The tanks were ~n fair
condition upon removal, with some rust on the lower surfaces, but no
signifi~cant pitting. No holes were noted in the tanks. Several small areas
· I
of discolored soil and strong product odors were noted in the bottom of the
excavation, beneath the former dispenser island location. On April 16,
1992, under the direction of Mr. Joseph Dunwoody of the Bakersfield City
Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division, EMCON field personnel
collected soil samples Al, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2 from native soil at
4233 West Sierra Mad e, Suite 109, Fresno, California 93722, (209) 275-4968, FAX (209) 275-5181
Mr. Bud Good Project A30-36.02
September 4, 1992
Page 2
depths of approximately 2 feet and 6 feet below each end of the former
underground tanks (Figure 2). The tank cavity was backfilled on April 16,
1992 with soil excavated from the tank pit and imported fill.
The results of the soil analyses are summarized on Table 1. Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline ranged from 3,300 parts per
million (ppm) to non-detectable (ND). The highest levels of TPH as
gasoline (3,300 and 440 ppm TPH) occurred at sampling point B2 at the
southern pOrtion of the former tank excavation. (Figure 2). Lower levels of
TPH as gasoline were detected at sampling points C2 (120 ppm and ND,
TPH) and A2 (2.5 to 28 ppm TPH). Low concentrations of TPH as
gasoline were detected at soil sampling points Al, B1,. and C1 at the
northern portion of the tank excavation. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
and xylenes (BTEX) were detected primarily at sampling locations A2 and
B2. Concentrations of the BTEX compounds are presented on Table 1.
The site is on the Kern River Formation which consists largely of poorly
bedded and loosely consolidated sandstone and conglomerate (Graham
et al. 1988)1. According to the Kern County Water Agency (1991)2, only
two wells exist within approximately one mile from the site. These include
wells into the unconfined aquifer of the Kern River Formation at the
southeast corner of Section 8 and northeast corner of Section 20 of
Township 29 South and Range 28 East.
According to Kern County Water Agency (ibid.), the depth to ground water
at the site is approximately 200 feet. The regional ground-water flow is to
the southwest.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work involves collecting soil samples from four borings in
and adjacent to the former tank excavation to evaluate the horizontal and
vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil. The first phase of the
investigation will only assess the soil. Once the extent of hydrocarbon-
impacted soil is evaluated, a decision will be made as to the necessity of
assessing ground water. If ground-water assessment is necessary, a
workplan will be prepared and submitted to the City of Bakersfield to
evaluate the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water.
1Graham, S.A., Carroll, A.R., and Miller, G.E. 1988. Kern River Formation as a
Recorder of Up/iff and Glaciation of the Southern Sierra Nevada Uplift. Studies of the
Geology of the San Joaquin:Pacific Basin. Section S.E.P.M., Vol. 60, pp. 319-331.
2Kern County Water Agency. 1991. Water Supply Report 1990. p. 70.
Mr. Bud Good Project A30-36.02
September 4, 1992
Page 3
The entire scope of work in this workplan will be supervised by a
California-registered geologist.
Task 1, Health and Safety Plan Preparation
EMCON will prepare a site-specific health and safety plan for the site
(Attachment A). This plan will be prepared to fulfill the requirements of the
Cai-OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (8 CCR 5194). This
regulation states that if a subcontractor employed or supervised by
EMCON will be on site, the EMCON project manager is required to
provide the subcontractor with a copy of the health and safety plan before
the start of the project. The health and safety plan'will inform the
subcontractor of the potential hazards in the work area and will provide
information on suggested -protective measures and emergency
procedures.
Task 2. Pre-field Activities
Before field activities begin, EMCON will arrange for field equipment. If
underground utilities are unknown, EMCON will contact 'Underground
Services Alert (USA), and contract a utilities Iocator service to clear drilling
locations. Each marked location will be hand augered to a depth of at
least 3 feet to help prevent accidental damage to subsurface lines or
piping, which could not be delineated by the utilities Iocator service.
Task 3. Soil Sampling
Four borings (E-l, E-2, E-3, and E-4) will be drilled using 8-inch,
continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger drilling equipment (Figure 2). It is
anticipated that each boring will be drilled to a depth of approximately 35
feet. Soil samples will be collected at 5-foot intervals by advancing a
modified California split-spoon sampler equipped with brass liners 18
inches into the soil beyond the auger. Soils encountered will be described
by a geologist in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System
working under the direct supervision of a California-registered geologist.
Headspace analyses of soils will be performed in the field with a
photoionization detector (PID) to test for the presence of volatile petroleum
hydrocarbons. For each sample interval, a wide-mouthed glass jar will be
filled approximately one-third full with soil and sealed with aluminum foil.
After approximately 20 minutes, the Teflon® tip of the PID will be inserted
through the aluminum foil and the highest reading of volatile gases
detected will be recorded. Each boring will be advanced until two
Mr. Bud Good Project A30-36.02
September 4, 1992
Page 4
consecutive samples are collected which have PID readings of less than
50 ppm volatile hydrocarbons.
Soil samples will be analyzed at depths of 5, 20, and 35 feet in borings E-
1, E-2, and E-4. In boring E-3, soil samples will be analyzed at depths of
20 and 35 feet. If a boring is advanced beyond a depth of 35 feet, soil
samples will be analyzed at a minimum interval of 15 feet and the deepest
sample will be retained for analysis. Soil samples retained for chemical
analysis will be sealed with Teflon® tape and polypropylene end caps,
placed in an ice chest with frozen gel packs, and transported to a state-
certified laboratory. The samples will be accompanied by the appropriate
chain-of-custody documentation.
At the conclusion of drilling, the borings will be backfilled to the surface
with concrete containing 5% bentonite. Soil cuttings generated during
drilling operations will be stockpiled on site in one location and covered
with plastic. A composite soil sample will be collected from the stockpiled
soil. The ultimate disposition of the soil cuttings will be determined after
analytical results have been evaluated.
Task 4. Laboratory Analyses
Eleven soil samples collected during the drilling of the borings and one
sample from the stockpiled soil will be analyzed for gasoline-range total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) using the California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (formerly Department of Health Services) analytical
methods recommended in the May 1988 "Leaking Underground fuel Tank
(LUFT) Manual" for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX)
by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 8020, and for
organic lead.
Task 5. Data Evaluation and Report Preparation
Upon completion of field activities and receipt of laboratory results,
EMCON will prepare a summary report. The report will include
· site map showing the boring locations
· detailed boring logs showing subsurface conditions
· description of sampling procedures and analytical
techniques
· Certified Analytical Reports and chain-of-custody
documentation
Mr. Bud Good Project A30-36.02
September 4, 1992
Page 5
· recommendations for disposal of the soil stockpile
· evaluation of findings
· conclusions and recommendations
Task 6. General Project Management
The project will be coordinated and managed through EMCON's Fresno
office. Mr. Steven Strait, a California-registered geologist and certified
engineering geologist will be the project manager. The primary
responsibilities of the project manager are
· client and agency communication and correspondence
° planning and scheduling
· project review and administration
SCHEDULE
EMCON is prepared to immediately begin this project upon Southland's
approval. Field work will begin two weeks after approval of the workplan
by the City of Bakersfield and will require two days to complete. A final
report will be issued approximately two weeks after receipt of laboratory
results.
EMCON appreciates the opportunity to be of continued service to
Southland. If you have any questions regarding this workplan, please
contact me at (209) 275-4968.
Very truly yours, '
EMCO~/~,ssociates ~,
Steven R. Strait, C.E.G.
Group Manager, Geology
SRS:csr
Attachments: Table 1 Summary of Analytical Results
Table 2 Laboratory Detection Limits
Figure 1 Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Attachment A Health and Safety Plan
Table 1
Summary of Analytical Results
. Sample A1 A1 A2 A2 B1 B1 B2 B2 Cl Cl C2 C2
Depth (ft) 14 18 13 17 14 18 13 17 14 18 13 17
TPH as gas (ppm) 0.3 0.8 2.5 27 ND ND 440 3,300 0.2 0.7 120 ND
Benzene (ppm) ND ND 0.006 ND ND ND 0.92 14 ND ND ND ND
Toluene (ppm) ND ND 0.013 ND ND ND 12 74 ND ND 0.64 ND
Ethylbenzene (ppm) ND 0.008 ND ND ND 4.2 38 ND ND ND ND ND
Xylenes (ppm) 0.006 0.019 0.048 2.8 ND ND 54 310 0.011 0.013 6.1 ND
PJ A30-36.02 September 4, 1992
Table 2
Laboratory Detection Limits
Compound Detection Limit (ppm)
TPH-gasoline 5.0
Benzene 0.005
Toluene 0.005
Ethylbenzene 0.005
Xylenes 0.005
Organic Lead 0.5
PJ A30-36.02 September 4, 1992
152753
·
0 1/2 I (MILES) NORTH
I I I
SITE ASSESSMENT
2300 COLUMBUS ST., BAKERSFIELD, CA
I.',°J,c? .o.I
SITE LOCATION [ A30-36.02)
147593
7-ELEVEN STORE PIP PRINTING
i B1 i C'l
0
0
I
82
E-2 , I I E-4
· EXISTING SOIL BORING
O PROPOS~ SOIL BORING
01 10T 20t 30 401 (feet) COLUMBUS STREET
SCALE NOFI~
SITE ASSESSMENT
2300 COLUMBUS ST., B.II~I-'RSRELD.
Attachment A
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
SAFETY EVALUATION
ProjectA30 -36.02
PreliminaQ, Site Assessment
Name: 7- Eleven Store #23446 Date: 8-27-92
Location: 2300 Columbus Stree Manager: Steve Strait
Bakersfield, California
TYPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED:
[] Drilling [] Surface Sampling
[] Trenchi ng/Excavati on []
[]]Hand Auger
SITE DESCRIPTION
I-)Sanitary Landfill (Active)
[]]Hazardous Waste Facility (Active)
[]Industrial Facility
[]Abandoned/Closed Waste Disposal Facility
[] Undeveloped/Open Area
[~Gasoline Service Station
0pen Excavation
Confined Space (Vaults, Manholes, etc.)
Are toxic substances known to have been stored/spilled on site:
)I~) Yes []No
Source of Information: t~4CON Underground Storage Ta_n_k Removal Report
If yes, list substances and provide data on environmental concentrations.
!
Soi 1 Water Air Stored
(ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (check)
TPH gas 3,300
benzene 14
toluene 74
ethylbenzene 38
xylenes 310
Comments:
-~roje~t Manager
Em¢ofl ~ssocia~es -
PERSONNEL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
ProjectA30 -36.0~-
Level of Protection Requirements
F~ "B''~ [] "D" Hardhat, safety glasses, steel-toed
[] "Cl" [] Other boots, and hearing protection
C] "C2"
Chemical Protective Clothing Requirements:
-Solvex gloves will be worn while handling samples
Respiratory Protection Requirements:
-Half- or full-facepiece air-purifying respirators equipped with organic
vapor cartridges readily available for use
Ambient Air Monitoring Requirements:
-Organic vapor concentrations will be measured intermittently with a
field photoionization detector. Consistent readings in excess of
1 ppm in breathing zones of workers requires upgrading Level of
Protection to Level C.
Field Personnel Training Requirements:
-Current medical monitoring status
-Training equivalent to that provided by 29 CFR 1910.120e
Decontamination Requirements:
-Wash hands and face thoroughly before eating and after work
-Dispose of disposable protective clothing on site
-Practice good personal hygiene
Health Hazard [nf0rmati0n:
-Exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons could result from skin contact: wear
protective gloves while handling soil and water samples
Other Relevant Information:
-Follow attached General Safe Work Practices
-Phone number and directions to nearest ~.~m~cal clinicg~/~L
provided on attached sheet~ ~
SaYety (~ffi cer [~ate
A30-36.02
Nearest emergency medical clinic:
Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
420 34th Street
Bakersfield, California
(805) 327-1792
Directions to hospital from job site:
-West on Columbus Street 2 miles to Union Street
-South (left) on Union ½mile to 34th Street
-West (right) on 34th Street ½mile to Bakersfield
Memorial Hospital
GENERAL SAFE WORK PRACTICES
The project operations shall be conducted with the minimum safety
practices described below for EMCON employees.
General Safety Practices for Personnel
1. Eating, drinking, chewing gum or tobacco, smoking, or any
practice that increases the probability of hand to mouth transfer
and ingestion of materials is prohibited in any area where the
possibility of contamination exists~
2. Hands must be thoroughly washed when leaving a contaminated,
or suspected contaminated area before eating, drinking, or any
other activities.
3. Contaminated protective equipment shall not be removed from the
regulated area until it has been properly containerized on site.
4. Removal of materials from protective clothing or equipment by
blowing, shaking, or any means which may disperse materials into
the air is prohibited.
5. Personnel on site must use the "buddy" system when wearing any
respiratory protective devices. Communications between
members must be maintained at all times. Emergency
communications shall be prearranged in case unexpected
situations arise. Visual contact must be maintained between
"pairs" on site, and each team member should remain close
enough to assist each other in the event of an emergency.
6. Personnel should be cautioned to inform each other of subjective
symptoms of chemical exposure such as headache, dizziness,
nausea, and irritation of the respiratory tract.
7. No excessive facial which interferes with a satisfactory fit of the
face-piece-to-face seal will be allowed on personnel required to
wear respiratory protective equipment (NIOSH).
8. All respiratory protection selection, use, and maintenance shall
meet the requirements of established EMCON procedures,
recognized consensus standards (AIHA, ANSI, NIOSH), and shall
comply with the requirements set forth in 29 CFR 1910.134.
9. Appropriate work areas designated for support, contaminant
reduction, and exclusion will be maintained.
10. EMCON on-site personnel are to be thoroughly briefed on the
anticipated hazards, .equipment requirements, safety practices,
emergency procedures and communications methods, initially and
in daily briefings.
11. Steel-toed vinyl boots will be worn on site at all times.
12. A multipurpose portable fire extinguisher shall be located on the
ddlling .rig.
13. All operations personnel will, whenever possible, locate the ddlling
equipment and themselves so that they will maintain an upwind
position.
14. Drilling shall not be conducted at any location until the area
proposed for ddlling has been cleared by a utility locater firm to be
free of buried obstruction such as power lines, gas lines, etc.
Safety Practices for Drill Rig Operators
In addition, the following precautions shall be adhered to by the drill dg
operator.
1. Before raising the drill rig mast in the vicinity of electrical power
lines, the operator shall walk completely around the ddll dg to
determine the distance of the dg to the nearest power line when
the mast is being raised (should be greater than twenty feet). Any
questions regarding the appropriateness of a drilling location
should be brought to the attention of the On-Site Safety
Coordinator.
· SAFETY.STD 2 November 12, 1990
2. Before drilling, the location must be adequately cleaned and
leveled to accommodate the drill rig.
3. Housekeeping: Suitable storage for all tools, materials and
supplies shall be provided. Pipe, drill rods, casings, augers and
similar drilling tools shall be stacked in an orderly manner to
prevent rolling, spreading or sliding.
4. Work areas and drilling platforms shall be kept free of materials,
obstructions and substances that could cause a sudace to
become slick or otherwise hazardous.
5. After stabilizing and leveling the drill rig, all unnecessary
personnel should be cleared from the area immediately to the rear
and the sides of the drill mast, before it is raised.
6. Augers shall be used in accordance with manufacturer's
recommended methods of securing the auger to the power
coupling. Additionally, the operator and tool handler shall
establish a safe system of responsibilities for the drilling, auger
connecting and disconnecting, and auger fork insert and removal.
7. Augers shall only be cleaned when the drill rig is in neutral and the
auger has ceased to rotate.
8. Unattended boreholes must be properly covered, or otherwise
protected.
SAFETY.STD 3 November 12, 1990
Summary o! Analytical Results
Sample: A1 A1 A2 A2 B1 B1 B2 B2 C1 C1 C2 C2
Depth 14' 18 13 17 14 18 13 17 14 18 13 17
(It)
TPH as Gas 0.3 0.8 2.5 28 ND ND 440 3,300 0.2 0.7 120 ND
(ppm)
Benzene ND ND 0.006 ND ND ND 0.92 14 ND ND ND ND
(ppm)
Toluene ND ND 0.013 ND ND ND 12 74 ND ND 0.64 ND
(ppm)
Ethylbenzene ND ND' 0.008 ND ND ND 4.2 38 ND ND ND ND
(ppm)
Xylenes 0.006 0.019 0.048 2.8 ND ND 54 310 0,011 0.013 6.1 ND
(ppm)
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON May 27, 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FiRE CHIEF 326-3911
The Southland Corporation '
Central Pacific Division ~
5820 Stonerid§e Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Attn:. Bud Good
RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site assessment
conducted at the Southland Station No. 23446, 2300
Columbus, Bakersfield, CA. (tank removal permit #BR-0048)
Dear Mr. Good,
Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your
facility, this office has determined that the extent of the
contamination plume has not been adequately defined.
This office requires (in accordance with chapter 6.7 of the
California Health and Safety Code and chapter 16, Title 23 of the
California Code of Regulations) that further assessment be done to
define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination
plume.
Please submit a work plan for further assessment,~ to this office,
with in 30 days from receipt of. this letter. The work plan should
follow guidelines found in: Appendix A - Reports, Tri - Regional
Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and
Investigation of .Underground Tank Sites; January 22, 1991.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Si~cerel,.~,
Joe A. Dunwoo~
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
REMOVAL REPORT
7-Eleven Store
Southland Station #23446
2300 Columbus Street
Bakersfield, California
May 1992
Prepared for:
The Southland Corporation
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, California 94566
Prepared by:
EMCON Associates
4233 W. Sierra Madre Avenue, Siute 109
Fresno, California 93722
Project A30-36.01
Consultants in Wastes
Managementand May 7, 1992
Fnvironmsntal Control
Project A30-36.01
Mr. Bud Good
The Southland Corporation
central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, California, 94566
Re: Underground Storage Tank Removal Report
Southland Station #23446, 2300 Columbus Street,
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Good:
EMCON Associates (EMCON) is pleased to present this report describing
s0il sampling and analysis activities performed during the removal of three
underground fuel storage tanks at the above-referenced site. Permitting,
excavation, removal, and disposal of the tanks, and backfilling of the
excavation was performed by Banks Construction of Fresno.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
On April 13 and 14, 1992, three product dispensers and associated
product piping were removed from the site. The tops of the three
underground tanks were excavated and exposed in preparation for
removal. A copy of the tank abandonment permit is included in
Attachment A. On April 15, 1992, three 10,000-gallon underground fuel
storage tanks, designated A, B, and C, were removed from the excavation.
The tanks were of single-wall steel construction, 8 feet in diameter, and 28
feet in length. The tanks had product histories of leaded and unleaded
gasoline. The top of the tanks were approximately four feet below ground.
The tank bottoms were approximately twelve feet below ground. The
tanks were in fair condition upon removal, with some rust on the lOwer
surfaces but no significant pitting. No holes were noted in the tanks.
Several small areas of discolored soil and strong product odors were
4233 West Sierra Madre, Suite 109, Fresno, California 93722, (209) 275-4968, FAX (209) 275-5181
noted in the bottom of the excavation, beneath the former dispenser island
location. Field data.is included in Attachment B. On April 16, 1992, under
the direction of Mr. Joseph Dunwoody of the Bakersfield City Fire
Department, Hazardous Materials Division, EMCON field personnel
collected soil samples from native soil at depths of approximately two feet
and six feet below each end of the former underground tanks (Figure 1).
The soil samples were collected directly from the backhoe bucket into
stainless steel sample tubes, sealed with Teflon.tape and polypropylene
end caps, labelled, and placed in a cooler chest with frozen gel packs.
The samples were transported to Twining Laboratories, a state-certified
laboratory, in Fresno along with appropriate chain-of-custody
documentation.
The tank cavity was backfilled on April 16, 1992. The soil excavated from
the tank pit was used for backfilling, in addition to imported fill.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
In accordance with Kern County requirements, the soil samples were
analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline, and for
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA method
8020. Analytical results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of Analytical Results
Sample: A1 A1 A2 A2 B1 B1 B2 B2 .C1 C1 C2 C2
Depth 14 18 13 17 14 .18 13 17 14 18 13 17
(ft)
TPH as Gas 0.3 0.8 2.5 28 ND ND 440 3,300 0.2 0.7 120 ND
(ppm)
Benzene ND ND 0.006 ND ND ND 0.92 14 ND ND ND ND
(ppm)
Toluene ND ND 0.013 ND ND ND 12 74 ND ND 0.64 ND
(ppm)
Ethylbenzene ND ND 0.008 ND ND ND 4.2 38 ND ND ND ND
(ppm)
Xylenes 0.006 0.019 0.048 2.8 ND ND 54 310 0.011 0.013 6.1 ND
(ppm)
PJ A30-36.01 3 May 7~ 1992
Certified Analytical Reports, including detection limits, quality control data,
and chain-of-custody documentation are included in Attachment C.
Based on the analytical results and observations made by EMCON dudng
field activities, and subject to the limitations presented in Attachment D,
EMCON recommends that additional investigation should be performed to
assess the vertical and lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted
soil at the site. Depending on the results, remedial alternatives (e.g. soil
vapor extraction) should be evaluated and a program should be
established to remediate the soil.
EMCON appreciates this opportunity to be of service to Southland
Corporation. If you have any questions, please call us at (209) 275-4968.
VerY truly yours,
EMCON Associates
Robert Winkel
Environmental Scientist
Steven R. Strait, R.G. #4834
Geology Group Manager
RGW/SRS:rgw
cc: Kern County Health Department, Environmental Health Services
Attachments: Figure 1 - Soil Sample Location Map
Attachment A - Permits and UST Re-use Documents
Attachment B - Field Data
Attachment C - Certified Analytical Reports
Attachment D - Limitations
PJ A30~36.01 4 May 7, 1992
Attachment A
UST Abandonment Permit.
UST Re-use Document
-- ~//~~ Bakersfield.Fire l~)t. ~. ~o.
H~ROOUS MATERIA~ reVISION ,. ~-
UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANK PROG~M · -
PERMIT APPLICA~ON FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANF
SITE INFORMATION~ ~-// . -' '
FACILIW NAME ~-// CROSS STREET ~~
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~// PHONE No. ~- z~/- ~ 7//
MAILINGADDEESS ~ ~ ~~// CIW ~~ ZIPCODE ~:7//
CONmACTOR ~NFORMAZ~ON
COMPANY ~~ e ~ PHONE No. ~? //UC~SUCENS~ No. ~
ADDRESS ~o~ ~= ~~n~ ~ ClW ~~ ZIP CODE
INSURANCE CARRIER ~+~m ~. ~,~~ WQEKMENS COMP No.
,REUMANAR~ ASSEMENT ~,FORMAZ~ON
COMPANY ~~ ~;~ ~HONE No. ~ Z;C~UC~SE ~o.
ADDRESS ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ CIW ~ c4~ ZIP CODE
INSURANCE CARRIER e~ ~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No. ~ ~
TANK CLEANING INFORMAT~ON
COMPANY ~e~. ~ PHONE ~o. ~?- ~'~qq;
ADDRESS ~?~ ~ ~~+ ~ CI~_ ~x-~ ZIP CODE ~'~7~/
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~, E ~.. ~
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~1 b~ ' '.~/L ~ ~
ADDREss ~ ~ eD ~ m+~ ~ ~ CIW g ~, ZiP CODE
FACILI~ INDENTIFICATION NUMBER
TANK ~ANSPORTER INFORMATION
COMPANY ~,~5, c~ PHONE No. ~/-/7 ~ LICENSE No.
ADDRESS ~v CI~ ~ ~,J~ ZIP CODE ,
TANKDEST~NAT~ON .- ' '~ ,~ ~:-~/~ ~~
TANK INFORMATION
TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED
[!::~! ::i:';-?..".':i~:~7~.'.':~ .?-'::;':-.:::-".¢ i~.:-~:..':.~:i-%<,~!:'::.'%' ~ ~'-';~ ~ {~'.'-':..<;'. ~-: ? :! ~:;:: :::;:; f.-::::s:::.T-:::! ~ :::::: :: s:::::: ::s:!:!:;:!:!:: :: ~ :-';:i~!'.'.'-';:!;:;. ~'.'.-~:~.!:'::!-'.':i:~::. ::.-' ~ !:'?.!i:.:, 5:.:. ~.'.-'~:.;.! ;t-:~:-'. :!:::i :'.':::::i ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::i.':: ::~ :'-:: :-.". :_.'!::: ¢ '.':. ~.~-~:-:'1¢ ~!iii ~.-;'.'..:. 5~"-: i~!~!:i~::.'. [!i:~:!:!~:!:i :~::.'-:;:;!:g [: :::: '.:::::::::,'::::: '.::::: s: :::i:! :!::,::;".: ".'-~ :.-':. :~::~..,..<: ::; :: ::;:::: ::
THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL coMpLY WITH THE AT[ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY
STATE. LOCAL ANDFEDERAL REGULATIONS.
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
/?/~PPRENCED BY: ~// APPLICANT NAME (PRINT) APPLICant.htr'SIGNATURE
^P UCAT ON A.Pj Mn' AP O¥ D
· . -', ~ ~F:~.l,<'.c:; pAYABLE TO THE "CITY OF BAKERSFIELD"
GOL~N STATE METALS, INa. TANK DISPOgAL FORM
~rllle~, Cailornla g~87 ate
Phone (~5) 3~1~669 · 6ax (606) 3~7-5749 ~ ~ntraCtOr,a ~' ' ~ ' '
I ~l=eneo
CONTRACTOR: ~ l' (~t ] ] E l~ / '~ ] '~
._ ~._ ~ ~ -- _ / ....
AOORESS:
OEaTINA~ON; O.S.M. ' 2000 E. 8RUNDAGE LANE · a ~KERSREI. D, CA 93387
LICENSE
EHSD P~RMff NO: ~LLONS SERIAL NO. N~T~N8
,,iooo,
cL K INSPECTION goo ,gl
SAN & DRY (ACCEPT), OR
· r'~ RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT)
~_ LEL R~DING ~o 2.~2
,, ',~ OXYOEN CONTENT -- 1~o
,. DIEPOgAL FEE ' " ~o ~.aa
__ 9~AP VALUE ~ 4.~
_ OTHER
TOTAL
All fees Ineun'ad are per IDeal unless specified. Terms are
net 30 clays item receipt el tank. ContraCtor's signature
repfee~ta acoeptan~ of terms for payment, en~ confirms
t~et tank removal ~mpltes with State laws
CON'TFIA-C TOR'S SIGNATURE
CERTIFICATE OF TANK DI:~P( / DESTRUCTION
THiS I$ TO CERTII:Y THE .qEc,;~!PT ANO ACCEPTANCE OF THE TANK(~} A~OVE. ALL MATERIAL ~;PECI~ED W~LL BE C~MgLE1 ~L~
DESTROYED FOR SCRA~ RC~~URPOSES ~NLY
- . ,/ ..
Attachment B
Field Data
~ 03/16792 11:59 ~014
DAILY CONSTRUCTION LOG
Proi~'l (.j'
Recorder Name:
Weather:. ':;,,q,'~, u,~,~'.-1 Comments:
Start Tlme: ~)-~ 5, O Finish Time:
Desmtption of worn itern~ of task:
D~Gion of won ~ems of
De~ription ol wo~ ~ems of task:
03/13/92 11:57 ~011
~El'flCOfl ~i~ ~ov, i~
~.~~,~sf- o~s~w,~o~ ~o~
STO~ ~O~q~_ ........... PRO~ ~O~0~
STA~ON NO,' ~ ~ff ~NPRO~NO.: ~-- ~,. ~/ -
STA~ON~D~S: ~ ~O~ ~l ~l}~ ~O~IST~G~ ~-
I
: ~ ~ST~: .,. ~A~: ~ NO.:
co.moN OF T~: (~~ ~R, RUS~, HOt ~-q, ~)
PIPING II~ORMATION (Show Lo~ious of Pipes oa Map)
commoN:
~o~
TANK PIT INFORMATION
PITFL~R: D~¥,' WET, I~NDEDW~TI~ WATF~I.J~VEL: (FI'.BI~OWG$: )
$~-rl~ OF T~IC~I., TANK PIT $IDEWALI.~ (SHOW SOIL ~, FF~TUR~)
0 rm $ 10 I5 20 2S 30 35 40 45 50
o I I I I I ! ! ! ! ·
10-
15-
20--
' 03?{3/92 11:57 ~011
PIPING INFORMATION (Show Lomliom of Pipes on
~ ~, s~, Z ''/
~mOU:
TANK P~ ~RMATION ,
~. B~OW6S:
0~: ....
S~ OF ~I~ T~ Pff S~W~ (SHOW SO~ ~. ~~)
0 Fees $ I0 I$ 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
o I I I I I ! ! I ~ a
10-
15'
20-
03/~3/92 11: 57 ~ 011
~__~Jf~a~"~' OBSERVATION FORM
STORE .Il%W_ ORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION
STATION NO,: ~' ~ EMCON PROJECT NO.:
STATION ADDRESS:
~oss ~: ~.
T~K ~~A~ON (Sh~ ~o~ ~ Tm~ on MaM
~ ~$T~[-r-~: .... ~A~: ~ NO.:
CO~ON OF T~: (~~~R, RU~, E0~. ~)
PI~XNG INFORMATION (Show Lm:atiom of Pipes on
~mo~: ~A {~ ,
TANK P~ ~RMATION
PfiZeR: ~ ~, ~ WA~ WA~ ~: ~. B~OW GS:
)
~S~ OF~I~ T~K Pff S~EW~ (SHOW SO~ ~,~~)
0 Fm S I0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
o I ' ! ! I I I ! ! ~ ·
20-
Attachment C
Certified Analytical Reports
Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering. Construction Inspection .Materials Testing. Analytical Chemistry
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.1-12
CLIENT : RmconAssociates
4233 W. Sierra Madre #109
Fresno, CA 93722
ATTENTION : Steve Strait
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
The Twining Laboratories is accredited by the State of
California Department of Health Services for the analysis of
Drinking Water, Wastewater and Hazardous Waste under Certificate
No. 1371.
In accordance with your instructions, the samples submitted
were analyzed for the components specified. All samples analyzed
were submitted in good condition. The analytical results are
enclosed on the following pages.
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning the
analyses or results. Thank you for letting us serve you.
e ining Laborat_ri_., I..c
Chemistry Division.
JJK: dab
lc: herewith
ii
ID 2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472 [] 2521 East Valley Oaks Drive
Fresno, California 93716 Visalia, California 93291
(209) 268-7021 · Fax (209) 268-7126 (209) 625-1712 · Fax (209) 625-1714
[] 4230 Kiernan Avenue, Suite 105 Q 3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 124
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.1 PAGE 1 of 12
CLIENT : Emco~Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE T~PE ~ Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: A1 14'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes 0.006 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline 0.3 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
HDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visa~ia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.2 PAGE 2 of 12
CLIENT .- Emco~ 'Associates
PROJECT NAME .' Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED.' 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY .' S. Singh
REVIEWED BY .' B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION.' A1 18'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
-Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes 0.019 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline 0.8 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
F~'esno Modesto Visalia .. Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.3 PAGE 3 of 12
CLIENT : Emcon. ASsociates
PROJECT NAME .' Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED .' 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED.- 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED.- 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE T~PE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION.- A2 13'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene 0.006 0.005 8020
TOluene 0.013 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene 0.008 0.005 8020
Xylenes 0.048 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline 2.5 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection L~mit
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE %63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.4 PAGE 4 of 12
CLIENT : Emco~ 'Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED.' 04-20-92
DATE ANALXZED: 04-20-92
AHALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION.' A2 17'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.5 8020
Toluene ND 0.5 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 8020
Xylenes 2.8 0.5 8020
TPH-Gasoline 28 20 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.5 PAGE 5 of 12
CLIENT : EmcomAssociates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION= B1 14'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mu/kg) (mu/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020 .
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes ND 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline ND 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mu/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL = Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
F~esno Modesto Visalia - BakerstietO
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.6 PAGE 6 of 12
CLIENT : Rmcon'Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: Bi' 18'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mu/kg) (mu/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes ND 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline ND 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mu/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
NDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE %63298
EXAMINATION NO.= 692-2042.7 PAGE 7 of 12
CLIENT : Emco~Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp. ,
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY ~ S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: B2 13'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mu/kg) (mu/kg)
Benzene 0.92 0.5 8020 .
Toluene 12 0.5 8020
Ethylbenzene 4.2 0.5 8020
Xylenes 54 0.5 8020
TPH-Gasoline 440 20 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mu/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
Fres~o Modeslo Visalia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE = April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.8 PAGE 8 of 12
CLIENT : RmconAssociates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAHPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE ~ Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: B2 17'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene 14 10 8020
Toluene 74 10 8020
Ethylbenzene 38 10 8020
Xylenes 310 10 8020
TPH-Gasoline 3300 400 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
F~esno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.9 PAGE 9 of 12
CLIENT : Emcon'Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: C1 14'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.0.05 8020
Xylenes 0.011 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline' 0.2 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersflek:l
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.10 PAGE 10 of 12
CLIENT : Rmco~Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: C1 18'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mu/kg) (mu/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020 .
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes 0.013 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline 0.7 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mu/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfie~
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.11 PAGE 11 of 12
CLIENT : Emco~Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY ~ S. Singh
REVIEWED BY = B. Stafford
SAMPLE TYPE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONs C2 13'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.5 8020
Toluene 0.64 0.5 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 8020
Xylenes 6.1 0.5 8020
TPH-Gasoline 120 20 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH : Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visaiia Bakersfield
REPORT DATE : April 29, 1992 INVOICE #63298
EXAMINATION NO.: 692-2042.12 PAGE 12 of.12
CLIENT : Rmcon, Associates
PROJECT NAME : Southland Corp.
DATE SAMPLED : 04-16-92 by R. Winkel
DATE RECEIVED: 04-17-92 at 1051 hrs. from R. Winkel
DATE PREPARED: 04-20-92
DATE ANALYZED: 04-20-92
ANALYZED BY : S. Singh
REVIEWED BY : B. Stafford
SAMPLE T~PE : Soil
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: C2 17'
CONSTITUENT RESULT MDL METHOD
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Benzene ND 0.005 8020 ,
Toluene ND 0.005 8020
Ethylbenzene ND 0.005 8020
Xylenes ND 0.005 8020
TPH-Gasoline ND 0.2 GC/FID
NOTES:
Preparation (BTEX & TPH-Gasoline): 5030
TPH ~ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL ~ Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modeslo Visalia Bakersfield
Quality Control Report
for
Hydrocarbons (BTEX, TPH-G, TPH-D)
Analyzed By: S. Singh , Reviewed By: B. Stafford
QC Sample ID: NA -S-BTEX Spike Level: BTEX NA
042092 -S-TPHG TPHG 0.5ppm
NA -S-TPHD TPHD NA
Sample Matrix: Soil Spiked Sample ID: Spikinq Soil
Quality Control Report for Exam Number: 692-2042.1-12
***************************************************************
Matrix
Method Matrix Spike
Constituent Blank Spike Dup Spike
(mu/kg) (% Rec) (% Rec) Range
Benzene ND NA NA NA
Toluene ND NA NA NA
Ethylbenzene ND NA NA NA
Xylenes _ND NA NA NA
TPH-Gasoline ND 115 108 ?
TPH-Diesel ND NA NA NA
Method Blank: A method blank demonstrates the presence or
absence of contamination in the analytical
procedure.
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate: A matrix spike is a
sample to which a known amount of analyte has been added.
The percent recovery and percent recovery difference of
the matrix spike and the matrix spike duplicate are
analyzed to measure the accuracy and precision of the
analytical procedure.
NOTES:
TPH: Total'Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND : None Detected
HA : Not Available
Fresno Modeslo Visalia Bakersfield
· ,:.:~ .' f~i:~:.,,:.:::.;~,::, ~,~.~.~ ,~ '~.:~ :. ':'.:~ ~ '.THE :TWINING LABORATOBIES, INC'"i'"";::*!'~:i '-* Project Name ~'~'"'~'-'z~'JL) ~---'<~/~)°
~, f"~ (209' ,
'~; · ' :. ,: · TL~ ;,,. '
~'.' i~; :~., :,.,~. , .~.,{ ..,.~ ~ ., , '~' .......
~:.:~';>,~:":~. ',', ~'~'.:?? '...' . .'..:: ;Chah ~!~ ~d'~jald r.',,':'..' ,,. .
:.,,,; ..:": .
~:~ ~ '~at ~','
~ ~; Contact Name~ ~~ ~~ Z ,' ,E~pected T~na{?~nd:.
?":~: Phone ' ~':';;~3 ' "'.,':. 7'.;: :~. :._: ::~UTINE :~ BO, : ~ ':
:.... Contrac~PO ' , , .,:,-~ :.:..
~' ~ ,' /- I...~'~?~' ~ "* · Specify ~,~
)ier Name~ ~~ ~ *' ~' ' ..... '
~ (Print) ~" ~ ' '
,; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~;~ ~ ~q~,r~./ k/:~.:~':/~l,>'/ / /
" .~ S~plelD '* ' '~='Dat~ime '" Type's:: '~ ~ [~ ~~'~~~ ~:
. -- ~ :. -:,> . ,:~: ~ ~ ~ . ~ .:::'.= , :,, ..; ,,,:- .,. . ~:..~::, ,. ..
. . , . / ............
~ . ~ ..... , . ~ ~ ,~ ~ . . ,~,,. ....... , , - .
~.:,'~.-*~ . . ,.~,.. ~' . .., ~,, ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,, ~
~. , :, , ~:,,..,, . ;~ = ~ ~-.~'~, · ~ .., ~ ..... ,,¢:~. ,. "',%'~'~, ,,." · :,:,,~..
,. ~ ...... , .,,- .,- ~.-~: ~ _ . ..,~ ......... ~ . Dept.~..,Jnitas.~>, ..................
· Fo~ Water samples, p ease .., .: ~.:.:. ~,: .,... ,-,,.~. :,...,~,~=:.~,..,~ ,~... ,,~.:,?, ;,~, , :.~... ,,. ., , ; · ~ . :~. ~:~, ,:,....:...,- ~,:~..,-:~>~., :, ..,:~,. ,,: · .. .. :-. . ,, ,
Each hazardous ~mpe submdted ....... g~fth-followin-' :' '", -~,~ ...... .:'K ;"~ ~" ~:;F~'~" :, .' . .. · ~:.601:..g' '. '"-. ~'. :~:~ ::.. , '" :> .
foranalysmwdlbechargedahaz~?. ~ n.~.~.-,,, .... ' : ' ,. ~, . ,. ' ,' , .... ~. ;~: :.... ,., · . r "' ' ~2 ::::'' ....
OUS waste d sposal fee. Chents mat ~ ~,,,~,,:~. ':"'~'., ' · '.. ' ~.. ., ~ , ...... '.. ,: ',.:, '~ )?,, :',.,~ ) :'.':. :.' , . · '., · : ~ :~:::~. //~ ~ ~/ ~; ~ :-
..,.~,,~ ~ .... a~us samn es w thin 30 ~ waste water '~ : .,~: ' - ,' · ,,, '., ,:: ;~.'. }: '. ;.., '..,., , ' .. , .... ,~R~':~~.>~~ ~ , .:': ',
· ~'~ ~ , · ,,~ , . . .... ..., ,. ~., . ',., ,= .~.,
daysof ny disposal f~ DSurtaceWater(rivers. laKes). :'-":,~: .. .... ~ .... ' .-~'~'~': "' . ': ~ · ~:,v~:"~,~~
~ ;, ~/~ ~ Printed .... -".:~,' ' "'"'.' ~~,~ ~;~'~'~,~,~. ~'~ . _'
~- - ~ ~-- * ~,/* : . . · ' :ri':L;'i~O; ~;'~m~?:' ''~'~ "'~ .':': .~;,.'~'~;; -. Log ~n umw/
~' ' ~-/ /~?~ I~'~..; Date~ime . , :~ug, ..~,~. ~':"' :" , ' :, - ,..
.'., ....... . .... ., ,~."~?-. , '~*'.~... ..'., ..... .. ':'.'-' ..... .... ~.~ .~?... THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.'. "- ' Project Name
~::~0~ ~ '~ I.' ~'~ ::: . 27 Fresno..:; Street; Fresno,.. CA.~ 93721 ..... Address
~::":~ '" "~:~ '" .~ , . ,~ *. (209) 268-7021,~ .... ~.: ;' ~
;.Date ~i*~: ~" :."'"..': ;:-'"'~",'"'.:.... :~'~''' . Chaln-of,Cu,tod,.... . . . . .. ,, Becord.~;;.:: .,:..':' ~ }:~. :'.-.-SMgr.' :. .:::i :' . ,. TL~
Client
Name
· .::. e ,=q,. , .~.~, :'"'? .
Contact Name 5.~ ~~:{' .' '.' :'"Expected Tu'}Ta;o~"
Phone" ~W~., * ?O ~ {,,.,": ';';~,.' ' ::'~UTINE 'URUsH ~ ~" ."
........ n~u ' ~0 ~.0/ ":" '5:' " 'AdditonalF.sApply '" '
----,~- ~ .... . ~1~~ ~ Spec ..
- / : (Prinl} ~ ~ i. ' 0 FAX
'' Client ~, Sample · Sample" '
Sampl~ ID · ';' Date~ime Type:
~ (~/ ~' .... ~; ......... :~'~;'~':' ..:...,:...~.... ,': ~..:.
.. ".::f: .' .., .::, ..:7 '::':.,' . ~';~:::.
~ ~ '...j:..
' ~'-~ ' ~ '"',':: '~ ': 7 '~. ':'
:.i.~. :., :-:
. ]:
. : .... l ,': ~' ::,
i .~. .. . :,., ... ~;, :..:~...:.. · ~.~.,:.'~:.:: }-:~ ...........
. Each hazardous sample submitted. .Fo}Wate:~samples, please~.
I for analysis will be charged a hazard- ch~k'oneofthefollowing{::;'".~;':.~ ~'" ~"" ......
I ous waste disposal fee. Clients that D Ddnking Water :~.... . '?::~:. '~;
~1retrieve hazardous samples within 30 ~ Waste Water ~ ::~.,~" ::: } ~
I "days of the analytical report date will ~ Ground water
be refunded~ny disPOsal fees. . ~ .. , .,:,.,':::::~::" '. '?: ~?::~"':.:.
'- Delivered By:': "
~flature : Signature
~n~q ~ J/~ Printed "': '~: '. F Company '. '.":~ '
~y ~~ ~ ..,... :.:..:,.~,.:...~ .,.,: ~. .
~ime ~'/7 ~L iO;r~ CompanYDato~ime ' 'Oate~ime
, - '.i:!~'~ .;' .'...~:~ Log In Date~ime
Attachment D
Limitations
LIMITATIONS
The purpose of an environmental assessment is to reasonably evaluate the
potential for or actual impact of past practices on a given site area. In performing
an environmental assessment, it is understood that a balance must be struck
between a reasonable inquiry into the environmental issues and an exhaustive
analysis of each conceivable issue of potential concern. The following
paragraphs discuss the assumptions and parameters under which such an
opinion is rendered.
No investigation is thorough enough to exclude the presence of hazardous
materials at a given site. If hazardous conditions have not been identified dudng
the assessment, such a finding should not therefore be construed as a guarantee
of the absence of such materials on the site, but rather as the result of the
services performed within the scope, limitations, and cost of the work performed.
Environmental conditions may exist at the site that cannot be identified by visual
observation. Where subsurface work was performed, our professional opinions
are based in part on interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that
may not represent actual conditions at unsampled locations.
Except where there is express concern of our client, or where specific
environmental contaminants have been previously reported by others, naturally
occurring toxic substances, potential environmental contaminants inside
buildings, or contaminant concentrations that are not of current environmental
concern may not be reflected in this document.
May 27, 1992
The Southland Corporation
Central Pacific Division
5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 310
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Attn: Bud Good
RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site assessment
conducted at the Southland Station No. 23446, 2300
Columbus, Bakersfield, CA. (tank removal permit #BR-0048)
Dear Mr. Good,
Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your
facility, this office has determined that the extent .of the
contamination plume has not been adequately defined.
This office requires (in accordance with chapter 6.7 of the
California Health and Safety Code and chapter 16, Title 23 of the
California Code of Regulations) that further assessment be done to
define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination
plume.
Please submit a work plan for further assessment, 'to this office,
with in 30 days from receipt of this letter. The work plan should
follow guidelines found in: Appendix A - ReDorts, Tri - Reqional
Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and
Investiqation of Underground Tank Sites; January 22, 1991.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Joe A. Dunwoody
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION
PERMIT
UNDERGROUND FACILITY
Permit No.: 90018C State ID No.: 12385
Issued to: 7 ELEVEN FOOD STORE #2125-23~
C
Location: 2300 COLUMBUS
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93306
Owner: THE SOUTHLAND CORP
295 W. CROMWELL, SUITE 104
FRESNO, CA 93711
Operator: THE SOUTHLAND CORP
295 W. CROMWELL, SUITE 104
FRESNO, CA 93711
Facility Profile:
Year Is Piping
Tank No. Substance Capaci .ty Installed
1 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1982 YES
2 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1982 YES
3 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1982 YES
This permit is granted subject to the conditions listed on the attached summary of conditions and may be revoked for failure to
adhere to the stated conditions and/or violations of any other State or Federal regulations.
Issued b]a Ralph E. Huey
Issue Date: JULY 1, 1991 Title: Hazardous Material Coordinator
Expiration Date: JULY 1, 1994
pOST ON PREMISES
NONTRANSFERABLE
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) ! CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES :.i FOR LOCAI~AGENCY.iUSE :ONLY~i~iii!!? !~ ~:~ ::~ ~ ii ~:!i!~:~i ii iiiiii!ii ~:::::iii~. :.ii::~:i::i ilf~i::?:ii~if~ ii:~::!::i:?:i::::ii ~.ilili~ii~:iiiiiiiii!~; ?:.
F-~ YES ~'~10 REPORT BEEN FILED ? [] YES ~[~--'1~' NO ii
NAME OF INDIVIDU~ FILING REPORT PHONE SIGNA~RE
REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~OPERATOR ~ REGIONAL BOARD COMPANY OR AGENCY NAME
~ ADDRESS
- ~ ~ ~, ~
m~ . . " ~.~ , ~ UNKNOWN i..~' . .;' , '~
FACIL'' N~E (IF APPLICABL~, [~OPERATO~ I PHONE
~ ADDRESS
~ CROSS STREET
O L~AL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NTACT PERSON PHONE
- REGION~ BOARD l" PHONE
~= "' .!:: '~' , ~,~ ~ ' ," (.. ) ".' '~ ' "'
~ (1) , NAME QUANTI~ LOST (GALLONS)
~ ." .
~ ~ (2)
~ ~ UNKNOWN
~ DATE DtS~VERED HOWDIS~VERED ~ INVENTORY~NTROL ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ~ NUlS~CE CONDITIONS
~ DA~ OI~HA~GE BE~ ' ~HOO USEO TO STOP DISCHARGE (C~ECK IL ~AT
< . CONTENTS~gLOSE TANK & REMOVE ~ REPAIR PIPING
~ HAS DISCHARGE SEEN STOPPED ? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ CLOSE TANK & FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE PROCEDURE
o
~ ~ CHECK ONE ONLY
~ .~UNDETERMINED ~ SOILONLY ~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HAVE AOTUALLY BEEN AFFEO~D)
CHECK ONE ONLY
~'P.[UU~NA.Y s~ ASSESSMENT ~.K.~N SU~M~ED
~ ~ ~ NOACT~ON TAKE. ~ POlLUTiON C,A.ACTER~TiON
~ ~ LE~E~.~.~.UED ~ PREUM~N*.~S~TE*SSESS~[NTU.~RW*Y ~ .OSTCLE~U.~ON~TOR~.~.P.O~.ESS
~ REMEDIATION PLAN ~ CASE CLOSED(CLE~UP~MPLE~DOR UNNECESSAR~ ~ CLEANUP UNDERWAY
CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVATE & DISPOSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION (1~
~ ~ ~ CAP St~ (CD) ~ EXCAVATE & TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP & TREAT GROUNDWATER (G~ ~ REP~CE SUPPLY(RS)
~ ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~ TREATMENTATH~KUP(HU) ~ VENT SOIL (VS)
~ VACUUM EXTRACT(VE) ~ OTHER (O~ / ....
O
O
i
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
DIVI~[ON
-- ' UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANK PROG~M
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF'AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
FACILI~ NAME '~-// CROSS STREET ~e~ ~~
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR · ~-// PHONE No.
CONT~ACTO~ INFORMATION
COMPANY ~~ ~ ~ PHONE. No. ~ ~J G~j~LICENSE No.
INSURANCE CARRIER. ~-~+~ ~, ~,~ ~~ WORKMENS COMP No.
P~ELIMANA~Y ASSEMEN~ INFORMATION
COMPANY ~~ ~;~ PHONE No. ~ ~~LICENSE No.
INSURANCE CARRIER e~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFORMATION
ADDRESS ~y~3 E. ~~+ ~ ' CI~ ~ ZIP CODE
WASTE ~RANSPOR~ER tDEN~IRCA~ION.NUM~ER ~, V .~.
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~1~ · ~/L ~ ~x~/'~
ADDRESS '~ ~ ~o ~.~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ Cl~ E ~, ZIP CODE
FACILI~ INDENTIFICATION' NUMBER
TANK T~ANSPO~TEg INFORMATION
COMPANY E~,~5,~ PHONE No. ~/-/7 ~ LICENSE No.
TANK INFORMATION
TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPLICA~ HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, A ND WILL COMPLY WffH THE A~ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER
STATE LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
THIS FORM HAS BE~N COMPLIED UNDER PENAL~ OF PENURY. AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. lS TRUE AND CORRECT.
P~R~ ~Y: - -// APPLICANT NAME (PRrNg
WHEN APPROVED___
"/~=AKE ~CK~ PAYABLE TO THE "ClW-OF'BAKERSFIELD''
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION
I, ~-~. e~9~O an authorized agent of
name
~%~k ~ ~ C0 here by 'attest under 'penalty of
contracting.co.
perjury that the tank(s) loCated at~30O ~O/o~f-'.~(~ and
address
being removed under permit# ~R-O~ has been
cleaned/decontaminated properly and a LEL (lower explosive limit)
reading of no greater than 5% was measured'i~ediately following
the cleaning/decontamination process.
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM
FACILITY ADDRESS
OWNER PERMIT TO OPERATE#
CONTRACTOR CONTACT PERSON
LABORATORY # OF SAMPLES
TEST METHODOLOGY ....... '
'PRELIMANARY ASSESSMENT CO. CONTACT PERSON
CO2 RECIEPT LEL% 02%
PLOT PLAN
CONDITION OF TANKS
CONDITION OF PIPING
CONDITION OF SOIL
COMMENTS
DATE INSPECTORS NAME SIGNATURE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERUIT APPLICATION -FORU B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEU.
MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT ~] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT I'~ 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE~ TANK REMOVED
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # G B. MANUFACTURED BY: '7·
II. TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
A.~[~MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OIL B. C. [] laREGULAR [] 3 DIESEL [] 6 AVIATION GAS
o UNLEADED
[] 2 PETROLEUM [~ 80 EMPTY DUCT ~ lbPREMIUM [] 4 GASAHOL [] 7 METHANOL
,~_____,~..~DED [] 5 JET FUEL
[] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE ~.,,~,JE~2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW)
O. IF (A.1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #:
III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A. B. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD
A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~NGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER
..J~'~BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/FiBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
B.
TANK
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
(PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
[] 1 RUBBER LINEDL----J _.~-----[] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C.
INTERIOR
[] 5 GLASS LINING .~UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
LINING
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__
[] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP ~ 2?~3A-T'ING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
D.
CORROSION
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION~:::~] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION ~ PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION At'~) SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)~.~ FIBERGLASS PIPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U?..~_ LVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTI~~JT°MATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING~ 3 MON~'ORINGINTERSTITIAL [] 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
[ I---~VISUAL CHECK ,~ INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING r--I 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING ~]5 GROUND WATER MONITORING
TANK TESTING [] , ,NTERSTIT,ALMONITORING [] 94 NONE [] 9~ UNKNOWN [] 9g OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
I 1.ESTI~;tEDDAT~LASTUSED(MO/DAY/YR) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF ~ 3. WAS TANK FILLED WITH YES [] NO~~
SUBSTANCEREMA,NING GALLONS ,NERTMATERIAL?
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PEEl JURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
I APPLICANT'S NAME t /'~ ,~ / "~/ I DATE/--' / I
(PRINTED & SIGNATURE)
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBI~I~,dMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
I COUNTY # ~'J~RISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK #
H
STATE I.D..fi' ~. _ ~ ~,
PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
I
FORM B (9-90) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
FOR0034B-R4
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY E~ 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION []~_~ANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE-"~
ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSUR~ TANK REMOVED
/
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEMS -- SPECIFY iF UNKNOWN
A. OWNER'S TANK I.D.# ~ B. MANUFACTURED BY:
C. DATE INSTALLED(MO/DAY/YEAR) ? D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS:
II. TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
A. ~ MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OIL B. C. [] la REGULAR [] 3 DIESEL [] 6 AVIATION GAS
UNLEADED [] 4 GASAHOL
[] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY ~ PRODUCT ~2¢"I'b'"PREMIUM [] 7 METHANOL
~ UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL
E~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW)
D. IF (A.~)IS NOT MARKED. E,TER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STOREO C.A.S. ~ '.
II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A. S, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESlNBOXD
A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER
~"~BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
B.
TANK
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
(PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
[] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING ~LINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
LINING .
,s L,N,NG MATER,AL COMPAT,BLE W,TH 100.o METHANOL? YES__ NO__
D. COR"OS~O" [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP ~ ~'T,NG [] 9 V,NYL WRAP [] 4 P,BERGL~S RE,NFORCED ,LAST,C
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTiON.~I NONE [~ 95 UNKNOWN ~-~ 99 OTHER
IV, PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A ~ PRESSURE A IJ 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION ~_____~/1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A IJ I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)~ FIBERGLASS PIPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMtNUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U ~,..~ALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A tJ 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR .~LI~'E TIGHTNESS TESTING ~3 INTERSTITIAL
. MONITORING [~ 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ,...,
6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY;..AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
I APPLICAN'PS NAME J ~ / / ,//,/q
1
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY TRESTATE,.D.,U~'~'~POsEDO"THE,OURNUM~C~I~w
COUNTY # ~'~URISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK #
PERMIT NUMBER I PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (9-90) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
FOROO34B-R4
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A
COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACiLITY/SITE
I MARKONLY [~ 1 NEW PERM'T [~] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [~ 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION .J~'"'7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED SITE
ONEITEM ~} 2 INTERIM PERMIT ~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE
I. FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED)
DBAOR FACILITYI'.)AME ~ /' // ~ NAME OF OPERATOR
BOX
~ORPORATION [~ INDIVIDUAL [~ PARTNERSHIP ~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ COUNTY-AGENCY E~ STATE-AGENCY [~] FEDERAL-AGENCY
TO INDICATE
D~STRICTS
TYPE OF BUSINESS [~ 1GAS STATION ~ 2 DISTRIBUTOR , I~ .v' IF INDIAN ,# OF TA.~NKS AT SITE , E.P.A.I.D.#(op#onal)
~ RESERVATION
E~ 3 FARM ~ 4 PROCESSOR THERI OR TRUST LANDS
I
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY). optional
DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST. FIRST)
PHt'3Nf: ~ WiTH AR(:A
NIGHTS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (LAST. FIRST)
pHONE # WITH AREA CODI~
II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED)
MAILII~G OR STREET ADDRESS -' ,/~ / ' e F'"-] INDIVIDUAL [~ LOCAL-AGENCY [~ STATE-AGENCY
~ COUNTY-AGENCY E~ FEDERAL-AGENCY
CiTY N-A I'VE v ....... ~ STATE.4 ZIP~..ODE
III. TANK OWNER INFORMATION- (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME OF OWNER ~ CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION
"q~ILING"OR STREET ADDI~ES"S --' -
,/ box to indicate [~ INDIVIDUAL E~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY
[~] CORPORATION E~] PARTNERSHIP [~] COUNTY-AGENCY [~] FEDERAL-AGENCY
CITY NAME STATE ZiP CODE PHONE # WITH AREA CODE
IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise.
V. PETROLEUM MST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED
I ~/ box to indicate ....J~;~"~SELF-[NSURED E~ 2 GUARANTEE E~ 3 INSURANCE ~ 4 SURETY BOND
[~] ,5 LETTER OF CREDIT [---] 6 EXEMPTION E~ 99 OTHER
VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notification and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked.
THIS FO~M HAS B££N COMPL£T~D UND£FI P£NAI..T¥ OF P£RdU~¥, AND TO TH£ B£$T OF MY KNO~I..£DG£, I$ TRU~ AND CORIrl~¢T
A LICANT.'~ NAME (PRINTED & ~IGNATURE) // /'~ I APPLICANT'S TITLE Z~"- ~ DATE .. MONTH/DAY/YEAR
COUNT~ JURISDICTION # FACILITY #
LOCATION CODE - OPTIONAL [CENSUS TRACT # - OPTIONAL SUPVlSOR - DISTRICT CODE - OPTIONAL
THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY AT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY.
FORM A (5-91) FOR0033A-5
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3970 R
.,1~''~ UNDERGROUND TANK QU_ESTIONNAIRE J&N 0
/I. , FACILITY/SITE No. OF TANKS ,_-~
CIW NAME . _
~ BOX TO INDICATE , ~COR~ON ~NDNIDUAL ~PAR~ERSHIP ~L~ALAGEN~IC~ ~COU~AGENCY ~A~AGENCY ~FEDE~LAGENCY
~ 3 FARM ~ 4 P~CE~OR ~5 OTHER TO OPE~ ~, .~'
E~ER~ENCYCONTACTPERSON(PR~AR~ E~ER EN CO ACTPERSON ~SECONOAR~
DAYS; NAME (~ST, F~m~ PHONE ~. Wire AR~ CODE DAY~: NAME (~ST. FIm~ PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE
NIGHTS: NAME (~$T. FI~ PHON~ ~. W~ AE~ COOE N~H~: NAME (~ST. FI~ ~ONE ~. WI~ AE~ CODE
II. PEOPE~ OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME . CARE OF ADORE~ IN~EMA~ON
MAILING OR STRE~ ADDRESS ~ ~X ~ INDIVIDUAL Q L~AL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY
CIW NAME ~ATE ZiP CODE PHONE ~. WITH A~ CODE
III. TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME CARE OF ADDRE~ INFORMATION
MAILING OR StRE~ ADDRESS ~ BOX ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ L~AL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY
Cl~ NAME
STATE ZIP COD~ ~ PHONE NO. WITH AR~ COO~
OWNER'S DATE VOLUME PRODUCT IN
TANK No. INSTALLED STORED SERVICE
YIN
~/N
Y/N
OOYOUHAVEFINANClALR,SPONSIBILI~? ~N WPE ke~ ~' ~dC~
I. TANK DESCRIPTION ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
A. WNER'S TANK ,.O., . 3 q -- / B. MANUFAC ,EO BY:
I
IlL TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXES~B. ANDC.~DALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD
A. ~PE OF ~. 1 DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WA~ WI~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY ~NTAINMENT WAUL~DTAN~ ~ ~ O~ER
· B. TANK
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONC.E~ ~ S mLWINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ~U~NUa ~ 8 ~ aE~ANOL COaPATlaLEW~RP
(PrimaryTank) ~ 9 BRON~ ~ 10 ~LVANI~D S~ ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ ~ O~ER
C. INTERIOR ~ s G~ LINING ~UNUNED ~ aS UN~O~ ~ ~ O~ER
MNING
JS UNING MATERJ~ ~MPATI~E ~TH 1~ M~ANOL ? YES_ ~__
D. CORROSION ~ t ~LYE~LENE WRAP ~ 2 ~ATING ~ 3 ~L ~ ~ ~ FlaERG~S REINFORCED ~TIC
PROTECTION. ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION ~1 NONE ~ 95 UN~WN ~ ~ O~ER
IV, PIPING INFORMATION C~RCm A IFABOVEGR~NDOR U IFUNDERGROUND, BO~IFA~LICA~
A. SYSTEM ~PE A U I SUCTION A ~ PRESSURE A ~ 3 G~VIW A ~ ~ O~ER
B. CONSTRUCTION A ~ I SINGLE WALL A G 2 ~USLE WALL A ~ 3 LINED TRENCH A G g5 UN~OWN A ~ ~ O~ER '
C. MATERIAL AND A ~ 1 ~RE STEEL A U 2 STAIN~SS S~ A U 3 ~LWI~L CHLORIDE (P~)A U 4 FIBERG~S PIPE
CORROSION A U 5 ~UMINUM A U 6 ~NCRE~ A U 7 ST~LWI~ATING A U 8 1~ ME~NOL ~MPA~B~W~RP
FROTE~ION A ~ 9 ~LVAN)~D S~ A U 10 CAT~DICPRO~T~ON A U 95 UN~O~ A ~ ~ O~ER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ ~TOMATIC LINE LEAK DE~CTOR ~ LINE T~H~ESS TESTING ~ 3 I~S~L
~N~OR~NG ~ ~
V. TANK LEAK D~ECTION
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLE~ ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
C. DATE INSTALLED (M~AY~EA") ~ / ~ ~ D. TANK C~ACI~ IN G~LONS: I ~ 0 ~ ~
/
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY [N BOXES ~ B. ANOC,~OALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXO
.. A, ~PEOF ~__ ~ DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WA~ W,~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ SINGLE WALL ~ 4 sEcoNDARY CONTAINMENT (VAUL~DTAN~ ~ 99 O~ER
: B. TANK ~ 8ARESTEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS S~EL ~ 3 FIBERG~S ~ 4 STEEL C~D W/FIBERG~SS REINFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLWlNYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ~UMINUM ~ 8 1~ ME~ANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
~ ~'L' , (Primar~ank) ~ 9 BRON~ ~ 10 ~LVANI~D STEEL ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ 99 O~ER
~ *' **~' ' ~ 1 RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ~D LINING ~ 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOL~ LINING
C. I~ERIOR
'ENING ~ 5 ~ LINING UNLINED ~ aS UNKNOWN ~ ~ O~ER
IS LINING MATERIAL ~MPATIBLE WITH 1~ ME~ANOL ? YES~ NO~
'~'" PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION NONE ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ 99 O~ER
IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRC~ A If ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BO~ IF APPLICABLE.
.~:~,~ ~ A, SYSTEMTYPE A ~ 1 SUCTION A ~ 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVIW A ~ 99 O~ER'
C. MA~RIALAND A~ 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS S~EL A ~ 3 ~LWINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A ~ 4 FIBERGLAS PiPE
~;, CORROSION A u 5 ~UMINUM A U 6 CONCRE~ A U 7 STEEL Wl COATING A ~ 8 1~. ME~ANOL COMPATIaLEW/FRP
' PROTE~ION A U 9 ~LVANI~D S~EL A U 10 cATHoDIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U ~ OTHER
;:'~: ID. LEAK DETECTION ~ AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DE~CTOR · ~ILINE T~H~ESS TESTING ~ 3 IN~ERS~L
;~ ~"' ' V. T~K LEAK D~ECTION
! * ~' I."T~.NK
~ DESCRIPTION TEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE I~M ONLY IN BOXES ~ B, ANDC,~DALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD
A. ~PE OF ~ ~ ~UaLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WA~ Wl~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ g5 UN~OWN
SYSTEM ~ SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY ~NTAINMENT (VAUL~DTAN~ ~ ~ O~ER
~1. BARE STEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS S~EL ~ 3 FIBERG~S ~ 4 STEEL C~D W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED P~S~C
B. TANK
MATERI~ ~ 5 CONCRE~ ~ 6 ~LWlNYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ~UMINUM ~ a 1~ ME~ANOL ~MPATIBLEW~RP
(P,imaryTank) ~ 9 BRON~ ~ 10 ~LVANI~9 S~ ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ ~ O~ER
~ I RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ~D L~ING ~ 3 ~ LINI~ ~ , PHENOL~ LINING
C. INTERIOR ~ 5 ~ LINING ~ UNLINED ~ 95 UN~OWN ~ ~ OmER
UNING
IS UNING' MATERI~ ~MPATI~ ~TH 1~ M~NOL ? YES ~ NO~
D. CORROSION ~ I ~LYE~LENE WR~ ~ 2 ~ATING ~ 3 ~L ~ ~ 4' FIBERG~S REINFORCED P~STIC
PROTECTION, ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION ~1 ~NE ~ 95 UN~WN ~ ~ O~ER
IV, PIPING INFORMATION C~RCm A IFAaOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BO~IFA~LICA8LE
A, SYSTEM ~PE A U 1 SUCTION A ~2 PRESSURE A U 3 G~V~ A ~ ~ O~ER
B. CONSTRUCTION A ~ I SINGLE WALL A U 2 ~UB~ WA~ A U 3 LINED TR~CH A G 95 UNKNOWN A ~ ~ O~ER
A ~1 ~RESTEEL A U 2 STNNLESS S~EL A G 3 ~LWI~L CHLORIOE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERG~S PIPE
C. MATERIAL AND
CORROSION A ~ 5 ~UMINUM A ~ 6 ~NCRE~ A U 7 ST~LWI~A~NG A U 8 1~ M~ANOL ~MPA~8LEW~RP
PROTE~ION A U 9 ~LVANI~D S~ A G 10 CATHODIC PRO~CTION A U 95 UN~OWN A U ~ O~ER
O. LEAK D~ECTION ~ AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DE~CTOR ~ LINE T~H~ESS ~STING ~ 3 I~ERS~L
~,ffOR~,G ~ ~ O~R
V. TANK LEAK D~ECTION
~ TANK TESTING ~ 7 IN~RSTI~ALMONITORING ~ 91 ~NE ~ ~ UN~OWN ~ ~ O~ER
I
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
I A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # B. MANUFACTURED BY:
C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS:
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD
I A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK'/ [] 99 OTHER
B. TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
(PflmaryTank) [] 9 BRO. NZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
[] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERIOR
UNING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__
D, CORROSION [] ~ POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
,'. IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RC~ A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE.
!:,?~.. A. SYSTEM TYPE A IJ 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE 4 U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER'
~ ii B, CONSTRUCTION A IJ 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C, MATERIAL AND A IJ I BARE STEEL ' A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE
" CORROSION A IJ 5 ALUMINUM A [J 6 CONCRETE A tJ 7 STEEL W/COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A IJ 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A I,I. 99 OTHER
~ D. LEAK DETECTION [~ I AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR . [~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL [-~ 99 OTHER
. MON~rORING
~:~ '/.. V. TANK LEAK DETECTION '
Monitoring Plan:
1. Monitoring shall be performed through Standard Daily Inventory
Reconciliation. This shall be done by the store operator,
2. An annual tank and product line integrity test shall be done
by a licensed tank tester.
3. Product line leak detectors shall be inspected and tested
semi-annually by a trained service technician,
4, Meters shall be checked by a trained service tec~hnician
registered with the Department of Weights and Measures semi-
annually.
Spill Response Plan:
1. Above ground spills will be dealt with by store personnel
according to severity, Smaller spills will be absorbed with
available material. Larger spills will be dispatched to
appropriate fire department~
2. Underground spills (potential, suspected or actual) will be
assessed by the Gasoline Supervisor. Potential spills will be
remedied by repair of potential problem. Suspected leaks shall
be inspected for actual problem or problem with paperwork
error. Actual releases will be handed over to our
Environmental Services Department for site assessment and
remediation.
'~~;::~ '- '. /- 21.30 G. stre~t,'Bak~rsfield, CA' 93301~' "~x~'~~//-' ', ~'-
.... ' '"'-'" ': :" RECEIVED
.... .-:.,: .:.; .... .....
: ...: .. ._.~ '- . -., . .-... : ,~", .,, .-:: .. ,,.". .. :
- .... .- .~ . , . ... .. . .. ,: ':." : ~.~
. .
OPE~TORS N~E ~ ~ ~bq' ~ZG.~ 'owNERS N~E~'~Z~ ~P "
TANK TESTING COMPANY ADDRESS 3~:/
, ...., .. . _.
NAME OF TESTER/~'~/j~ '.L.'/~5'/~',,z).L) CERTIFICATION % '~___~
.~. s~ ~'s~6~, ' ~ . '~': F~JIJI ' "..
, -,:'.,::~-' :- ." . , .. , ',. , ...... , .,,~ ~ ..... .,.:.,.:~,...- ~, ,.._.,.. ~- ~ .... ~ : . ~ , ..
:.,. . .. ~ ~.~..-~..:~..~o ~.co~~ ..///S~/'~. '~ /~~
.:' '~ '.-5~.:' . :~.,:' .-.'* ,'~ . · '~.~ .¥ ,- . ' - ; , ..~-," . ' .'. ': .. .* :> . -~'.~. ~. .' . "~ : i ,~' - · - ' . ~ .:'~
'/"Associated. . Environmental. Systems, Inc.'' ,. ." p,..__O,."'B6X 80427 . ._~.. ,:.~:~
... ~ : ::~;.~-..Bake'~Sf.i~eld, CA 93380.
· - AES -- SYSTEM II
' PRECISION TANK & LINE TEST RESULTS SUMMARY.·
Invoice Address: Tank Location: .. W,O,~: 15721
SOUTHLAND CORP 7-11. ~ 23446· I,D. Numbe~: 23446 ....
295 W. CROMWELL ~ 104 2300 COLUMBUS ' Technician:BNL ...... ,
'FRESNO CALIF 93711 BAKERSFIELD CALIF '. Tech,~:89165 Van~=6105 '" '"
. ..
.;Date: 11/13/91 Time Start: 11:00 End: 19:00 County: KE
Facility Phone~: 1-8~-871-1438 Groundwater Depth: N/A Blue Prints: N/A
Contact: MGR Date;Time system w.~s'filied: 11/13/91 06:00
Tank Fill/Vent Product Type Of Vapor Inches of Pump Tank
Tank Capacity ProduCt Tank. Vapor Lines Line Recovery Water/Tank Type Material -~'.
1 12K REG PASS pASs PASS PH-2 0 0 TURB S W S ....
~. 12K NOL ,~ PASS PASS PASS PH-2 0 0 TURB S W S
3 12K SNL PASS' PASS PASS PH-2 0 0 TURB S W S
-
Additional Information:
SITE LO8 TIME
<"Set'. Up EquiP: :..'
Rise~s"Instal led: N/A
.... .~,,. : ..: ,~'~ .... , ~E~/~ystem II P~-e~ision~leak, Test. ~t-aph-' ? . .
· Invoice No, ~ .15721: D~e~ 11/13/91' '" "~im~'~1,"14:'0~:51
'Vo!um'e'(g~l).~.'12032- $~'~d~ Level (ih)~ 142 P~-~du~t' L~vel (in) ~.' 1'35".. -..
Wa~et-Level On Tank(in)~ 0
Specific G~-avity: .'75 C°effieient Of Expansion: 0.0006572
Oalib~-ation ValUe(mi): 250 Channel: 1 ¥.
Level Begment Ft-oma ! To. 225 Temp Begment Ft-om~' 140 To. 300' "'
1
U
,%' -~:.
,,,,I ,I ,,I ' ' " ' .......... ' ' ' "
· i"/ ',[ I,j' .,::.,,..i
· : ..... Lj~ ,~ .....
· ?'Sta~ting-.Tempe~a~u~e (F)'~ 78. 139' Head',p~eSsu~e(col/in (B~m))'~ 101.2. '-
'~u~ace R~ea(Sq.. in) s' [36.~ "Teep~. Change(F/h) ~ ~.~8~ '
Level' VoIume (gph) ~ ~. 6~
Temp. volume(gph)~ 0.63 P~-odu~t Line!gph)~ .011
Ne~-change(gph).', t' -0.03 '. '
Invoice No'i :i~i5-/2iA Dage--: 11/13/91 . ' :" ~im~ :-~16~'~'9:.09 ..
T~ehni.eian: BNLL. "., ,""'. ~ . Tank: 2 . "' .Tank Diamet:~(in):.93 ~- .~
'VolU'me. igal):' 12032' ;-. -Geade Level(~n): 148; ~ Product L~v,l,(in) :-
Watep Level On Tank(in)": 0.
Speeifia Gravity: .75 Coeffiei.n~ Of Exp~n'sion: 0.'0g~36577
Calibration'Value(mi): 567 Channel:~ 2 .
Level Segmen~ From: 55 To~205 Temp Segment From:. 1 To 300
I.
"
LI
Chah'~e in Calibration .zone ,il9 -~ 'Calibration. Uni~(~al/un~) ~ 0.00776
~garging Te. mperagure (F) '1~.'.76,836 Head Pce's~ure (eoi/in (Bgm)')
Level" volume(gph): 0.65 -.
Temp. volume(gph): 0.67 Produc~ Line(Qph): .005
Ne~ change (gph) ~ .~'0.02. ':~
:.R",S.~ i.~'::_::'~--> P~88, ~.~ :;. -::-' .'.'-p/'L"...:,.~.>"::-~-'~:-'Pa~'~ ......
:~~:.-:~ .:~t~ . -~r?x,~f .::7: ~: ,, :- , .. :- --~z;~Z;;~ ..... : ., 7~?-'= .~:~
-.:.,-"-v :d;. "~ :':- ~ ': "~. ~ . . · .' .....~:~ ';~ :,,;; ~t';',?~? ':~::,~; S'~::c-5::, ..',- F~ :;,~? ~(~' L', ?~4,~.~,~,~;:v,'~?t,,?:~-r, ~ ? t~ ~?' .- ..,~t.' ,? .~.~:~.~-.;:,:;.~: · : .....
-'.~:-~-'~-Fs'. ''~, ,',; , , · , ;:.. '~'-~c?,: ~ ,;~;:~.~' '~ ~ ,~':?;~ 's . ,,"- ~: -:;~ s,:t--:'~ ~ ~ ~,~-;,:'t. '..',,,,, .. ~,'~:' :?: ',_~, ,
Invoice No,~ 15721 D~te~ 11/13/91. Time ~ 14:04:51
/ ' Technician: BNL Tank: 3 - ...' ·Tank Diametet-(in):' 93
Volume (gal) ~ 12032 Gt-ade Level(in~: 145 P~-odu~t Level(in): 140
" Watee Level On Tank(in): 0 ,~ .--. .,
.~.' Specific Gt-avity: .75 Coefficient'Of Expansi°nt' 0.0006561
Calibt-ation galue.(ml) ~ 250 Chanael:--'.3 -'~,,' '"'
.. Level Se~men.t .Ft-°m~ 1 To 225 Tamp BeBment F~-omt 1 To 300
..: . t ,,, LJ L,., ~ .... . ,',;',~ ..
-
'. i",1
~'. ,,,,I ,1"~":1 ....................... "
· .'~ ,[1~ ,,uL,, '"", '
' Change In Calibration Zone. = 10' Calibration Unit(gal/unit) = 0.00650
". Stapting,Tempepatupe (F): 80.047 Head Ppessupe(col/in (Btm)): 105.0
::.. 8u~fa~e.A~ea(sq,. in)~. 150.1 Temp,-Change(F/h).,.: 0.094
:.Level.Voluee(gph)~ · ~.?&
':* ~7: i' i~' '~"~6~:~::~ 2'300:*' COLUMB~S?~ ::-FBA~ERSF, I ELD' CA~I ~?' H I GH~ :~EVE~ TES.T';~' ~:250~ MLhCA~,,
Environmental Sensitivity Insp~tion Time /["'~ -- [ ~ Y~
~UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE FACILITY
· - * INSPECTION REPORT *
No. of Tanks ~ /Is Information on Permit/Application Correct? Yes ~ No~ Permit Po~? Yes~ No~
Type of In~ection: Routine ~ Complaint Rein~tion
Comments:
ITEM VIOLATIONS NOTED
a. Intercepting and Directing System
b. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring
c. Modified Inventory Control Monitoring '
~ (~ln-Tank Level Sensing Device
~ e. Groundwater Monitoring
~ f, Vadose Zone Monitoring
2, Secondary Containment Monitoring:
a. Liner
b. Oouble;WaUed Tank
c. Vault
~) Piping Monitoring:
Pre~rmrized
b. Suction
c. Gravity
4~. verfill Protection
5. Tightness Testing
6. New Construction/Modification
7. Closure/Abandonment
8. Unauthorized Release
9. Maintenance. General Safety, and
Operating Condition of"Facility
Comme~;ations: .~7/, ~__.~~ /~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~ ~~~/ ~
Health 580 4113 170 (7-87)
~ ., ?. COUNTY. A'IR POLLUTION CON'[', STRICT
I ~ ~,. .'2700 "M" Street, Suite 275-- "
......
I '"-- Bakersfield CA. 93301 - '~i, '
....... -' (805) 88'1-9682 ........
- :, ..L ,,; .- , :,,- F ' T ' "
' '...,'?," S:.75. 'OVE~D R~TOR
. '""' 8. ~ER%PZLOT ~ (H~) -- ~' -- ~ -~' *;'~'~ ~;~ ~:;.'
¢ ~ .......................
. .
~:~fi~".~=~lance ' . HE~]ey "' . I ~ missing, T~ torn, F= flat,
'~:.',,~;~.;.(' :~ Jacket ~]f Hasse]~nn I A~ ne~s adjust~t, .. L- ling,
~LTS'~ ~ .- -. .. ..
_,?...~..,..,,...,.,.., ..... .,... ..... : ,..-...,' ..-.~
, .... '~ ':': :'.:'.-:'~..~:,.,..;-,:i~}~. :..,:...:::
. seven days, T = Tagg~ (nozzle ~agg~ ~t'¢ oPden
unti~ ne~ffrs c~p]et~.) ......... :
NOTE: CAL~FO~A H~ & ~F~ ~DE SECT~ 41960.2, RE~R~ ~AT
~F~O~C]~ BE ~RREC~D N{~N ? DA~. FAILURE TO ~PLY ~AY ~LT IN LEaL AOTZ~ .,
. ............ ..?~:-.'-"_
KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION~TROL DISTRICT
9330
I VAPOR REC(YVERY:iNSPECTION FORM '-~
CAM EOCK'ON. VAPOR
;MI,~INO.,~ _. II
B~E~ ADAPTOR & F~LE '-:.t;:::i.:.;~;~ . .'.::'..~-.-~//. ..
'. : , ':::'?'~;:., ~,-:-.?-:.,:, ~ ,'- . : · .:... :. , -:,; -.: ':?;...:,~'~ ;:::~:': · :..,. :,:.... :'>:-.-.,::,-,
' ":" ':' ?"~;~ ~CE~ZVE VERTICAL-'P~Y ,IN ':":" ;.':~:,;::'.:'::;:.::X~ ',:';-:, '--
":":'"":' SPRING '"' ....... ¢:::':7:::,;::;;::6'Id .;"'~ .... O/L :'ot~"-~h~;-- ...... ~ -;:' -
-. T.,' ':'- ::-NE~Z~ DEFECTIVE
" "'~ ...........'"' ' ....... ' .... ' ........ ' .....-"'"'"'~' ' / ~ 9 ,, ' :' '' '- ....
', .... . .... ?':"::-.'.' .... ¢" '..:' .'' , '- . : ' """~ "-<:-*"";~'>:~'~¢~-'- "' ; o -7.~;;: .: ..,..",~. .. .' ,' ".:.L;; ,
NOTE: A CHECK A~VE INDICAT~ A ,V~O~T~ OF KCA~D ~LE 209 ' ..RECEPT [OF ~LINE
PRIOR TO. ~RRECTI~ ~Y ~R~ER ~STI~TE A VIO~TI~ OF KCA~D ~L~ 20g & 412.
.- .,.- ., ,. : ~.~: '.::..' ;:.
. - . . ,
Tag Numb, r ~ I rate 'e'Z7 'f"l 'n, md/" O
Station Name 7--//'
. Station Address ~-- ~ O0 ~0/--4'I/'~-~} t4,:~
lnsl~:tor
~._.Totalizer Readinc~ When Ta~ed ~V~'~,,~ ~
WARNING
Use of this device is prohibited by state law .and-
authorized removal of this tag'or use of this equipment
· will constitute a violation of the law punishable by a
m~imum c/vii ~ine of $1,000 per day or a maximum
~minal fine of $S00 per day and/or six months in jail
I declare under pena~ of perjury that ',he device tagged
was not used, nor was the tag removed, until the required
repairs were effected and the district notified.
Repaired by. . Title.
(Please print)
Si~nature..
Date .Time
Tolaiizer Reading at Time of Repair
Repairs made
BEFORE USING THIS DEVIVD~T/elepl]o~EF ~o,,~ local air
pollution control district at <~Dc~ f ~ ~ -r .-~ o .
If repairs were made to the nozzle body you must notify
the County Department of Weights and Measures.
66118
ELEVEn .-
November 20, 1986
Kern County H~alth Department .':
B~ersfield, Calif. 93305 ,,~.
Attn: Mr. Joe Canas
.................... ~ar Mr. - Camas ,
I would like to tha~ you for approving our Store Gasoline Report that
is to be used in lieu of your Inventor~ Recording Sheet ~d Inventorg
Reconciliation Sheet. As per our ~eting wi~ you on Nove~er 13, 1986,
your Inventory Reconciliation S~ar~ and Trend ~alysis ~orksheet will
still be completed by our stores.
Enclosed are ten(10) copies of our re~rt ~at gou c~ distribute to
gout field personnel. The nu~ers that ap~ar in high-light areas
corres~nd to ~e colu~ headings on your Inventory Recording Sheet
Inventor~ Reconciliation Sheet.
Again, tha~ you for gout ti~ ~d attention. If you have any questions,
or if we can be of assistance to you, please let us kn~.
Division Gasoline Sales Manager
Western Pacific Division
SH:jas
cc: Jack Doolittle
7-Eleven Stores/Western Pacific Division
1240 South State College Blvd. / Suite 100 1 P.O. Box 6520 / Anaheim, California 928061 Phone (714) 635-7711
~.m) CORPORATION
ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH
5.Corp Stares ~hKE~SFiELD, CALiFOrnIA 93509
1805). AGMT
STO~E t [B~ t PH~I;E ~ F~GNCHISEE STD~E A~ESS F~ ~ATE.
t3~52F 46124 323-56~i . ..Judy Frieni) ................ 2331 Chester Lane~ BikEd. 93304 .... II76 '06707177
............. ~36A -;6!67 8711577 H&FKy & G~ra~il Sin~n 3760 Bernard St., Bakid. 93306 6/85
l/xl2~A 61034 a;i-1550 Sas Austin & Eleanor Bigelo~ 1701Pacbeco Rd., ~akid. 93307 i/Ti
1~14~ 62031 322-757E Bas Kirin & Jerry ~cBiil 525 ~est Columbus, Bakfd. 93301 618I 02/~5/86
17721) 67146 ~5~-~G~'5 Gas Ji~ Liyindecker 3~01Stackdal/ Hwy., BikEd. 9330~ 6163 01117/85
I~55E 72273 315-Z7,36 Bas ~irt Seizer 300 North Chester, BakEd. 9330B 4188
t~?~;l &71C~ i24-41~8 Corporation 1200 h Street, ~akfd. 91301
~-.~,,1 ~S Ci~I ~ ~arli ~arcla ~2b Cecil ave.~ 9eiano ~121b b/BI 01/21/i5
~l~ 13~1 ~4-~5~5 Gas iii ~ L~is ~rice' ~0'12 ~hite Li~e~ ~iJ. Jd, ~09 71Bg O~/IOiBi
25)5~ 1225 ~5-14~4 6a~ Jack I ShiNe) ~.ines 10400 ~ain St.~ Laiont 932il 61S1-
2~998 5094 36b-476~ ~s Gin Dashtioour 6529 E. Brun~age Ln,, Bakfd. 9~07 6/~6 06i15i87
~70IA 4095 ~5~-175~' ~s ~ick [ i~!trio V~zquez 1540 ~ear ~tn. Blvd., Arvin 93203 4/aa 04/:a/ag ~!
27463A 5~54 746-5;~,7 ~s Camiio & garia Garcia 451 E. Lerdo H,y., 5haiter 93263 4/~3 03iO~iB~ ~lO01~
18725 14329
t~4~1 16~4~
2147~ 17721
2~3J! 20317
./ I.Z . .
caepB~ ,a~ STORE NO DI.T, TR~CT DATE TIME
SECTION I - OAILY~LES
. , Re,ad GALLONS (Tfn~ht) AMOUNT fCer~sl R~I GALLONS
Su~ T~t~ I
3. *om sma 601 ~ S [ ~2. ro~.~ So~o
Relad NO.LEAO PUMP -
Retad PREMIUM PUMP Rets/.
GRA~ TOTAL (Total of L,~ 3.6. 9. 12. 15 A 18 rowe - efltet ~ L,~ 132 of ~ R~I
*THIS AREA ~N 8E USED FOR OIESEL .C~ ~, GASOHOL -C~ 6~, ~ER ~ LEAD-C~ ~Z.
-~ 1. B~GINNING INV~NTORY
+
~ 2. DELIVERIES (ATTACH OELIVERY PAPERS) ]2
'~% 3. TOTAL {LIN~ t aND 2)
= 14 o~ ZS 14 o~ ZS 14 ~ 15 14 o~
5. I~¥[NTORY ON HAND
+
6. iNVENTORY iN TANK (ACTUAL) 4
B. YE~EROAY'S MONTH-TO-DATE OVER, ,SHCRT~ (~j ]~
9. CURRENT ~NTH-T~OATE 0VERHSHORTt 1~
10. CURRENT (TODAY*S) STICK READING HNCHES) ] ~.
Z7 tN.~
11. WATER IN TANK - STICK READING IINCHE$)
OPENING G~UNE ~LE5 RECORDED
CLOSING GA~LINE +
12, REGISTER READING REGISTER READING -- ON REGI~ER
INVENTORY 8EF~E DELIVERY INVENT~Y
~UMP OELIVERY GA~LINE ~UDIT
METER INCHE~ G4~LON~ INCNE~ GAbLO~
~hf L~ TO SI; __ ~lit L~ Frffi $1~ . TOTAL
GALL~S CO$T OF GALLONS
DELIVERED DELIVERIES UNITS C~ P.O. N~BER OELIVEREU EILL OF ~DING
NO LEAD 628
S~ER j I ' ,
NO LEAD ~'
'3tm 61~33 2,81
SECTION I -OAILY
Pe~ G~ REGULAR PUMP Pe~ GaH~ PU~ (If ~l
Rel/d GALLONS fTe~lns) AMOUNT ;~ntsl Retld. GALLONS (Tenthtl AMOUNT
I. Cu,~l Re~mg $ } 10. Cu.ent qe~,ng ~
Reti, I - :~NO.LEAD PUMP:' ' ..... Retail ~ (If
> e. *om ~ 627 1 S I tS. *om ~d *
Per ~1~ P~ G~I~
'THIS AREA ~N BE USED FOR DIESEL .C~ ~5, GASOHOL .C~ 6~. SUPER ~ LEAD-C~ ~7. S
~ REGU~R ~ LE~ PREMI~ OTHER
', + 4 4 4 ' d
t. BEGINNING INVENTORY
2. DELIVERIES {ATTACH OEUVERY PAPERS1 ~2 ~2 ~2
~ TOTAL (LINE 1 AND 2)
= 24 O~ 25 24 oz 25 J4 o~ J5 14 or
S. IR~'ENTORY ON HAND
6. INVENTOR~ IN TANK (ACTUAL) ~ ~ ~
~. YE~ERDAY'S MONTH-TO-DATE OVER. ,S~CRT) {~) 76 I 1~ ~
9. CURRENT MONT~.TO~ATE OVERI($HORT) · a ~ ~ ~ ~
tO. CURRENT (TQOAY'SI STICK READING (INCHES) ] IN.} ;
CLOSING G~LINE + OPENING GA~LINE SALES RECORDED =
12. REGI~ER READING REGISTER READING -- ON REGISTER
6EFORE DELIVERY INVENT~Y
PUMP AFTER DELIVERY GA~LINE
METER INCHE$ G~LLON~ INCHES GALLONS GALLONS~e'IS~c"
4 REGU~R ~
4 ~6~
4 616
OELIVEREO DELIVERIES UNITS COST P.O. NUMBER ~'~'* 8ILL OF LADING
~2 ~
628 ~ ;:
I "
630 : '
VENDOR NO ' VENDOR AMOUNT P 0 NUMBER" VENDOR NO. VENOOR AMOUNT P O. NUMBE~
h~UMBE~R OF TANKS AT THE SITE: ....... ~ .................................. ENV. SENSTTIVITY .........
EME'RGENCY CONTACT PER'SoN(PRIMARY):
NAME:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(SECONDARY): NAME:
PHONE NUMBER:
TANK OWNER INFORMATION: ,
NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE NO.:
TANK CONTENTS:
TANK ~ MANUFACTURER YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CONTENTS
TANK CONSTRUCTION:
TANK ~ TYPE(dw, sw, see.cont.) MATERIAL INT. LINING CORROSION PROT.
LEAK DETECTION: TANKS: . VISUAL ......... ,.GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
VADOSE ZONE MONITORING WELLS U-TUBES WITH LINERS
U-TUBES WITHOUT LINERS VAPOR DETECTOR LIQUID SENSORS
CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS PRESSURE SENSORS IN ANNULAR` SPACE
LIQUID RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS IN U-TUBES, MONITORING WELLS, OR ANNULAR
NONE UNKNOWN OTHER
PIPING INFORMATION:
TANK ~ SYSTEM TYPE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
(SUC, PRES. ,GRAV. ) (SW, DW,LINED TR)
LEAK OETECTION: PIPING: .,.~ .... FLOW RESTRICTING LEAK DETECTORS FOR PRESSURIZED
PIPING MONITORING SUMP WITH RACEWAY
SEALED CONCRETE RACEWAY HALFCUT COMPATIBLE PIPE RACEWAY
SYNTHETIC LINER RACEWAY NONE UNKNOWN
OTHER
PERMIT NUMBER ~dD/~' ·
TYPE OF INSTALLATION
( ) 1. In-Tank Level Sensor ( ) 2. Leak Detector ( ) 3. Fill Box
! .-":IN TANK' LEVEL""SEN~ORS .........................
Number of Tanks ~ Lls~ By Tank ID
Manufacturer & Model Number ~77m -(
Contractor/Installer
2. LEAK DETECTORS
Number of Tanks ~ List By Tank ID
Name of System ~ ~
Manufacturer a Model Number
Contractor/Installer
3. FILL BOXES
Number of Tanks , ~ List BY Tank
Manufacturer a Model Number
Contractor/Instal 1er
' /- I
OWNER/OPE~T¢~ ~ DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
i~ Gas Stores 4008 WHITE LANE
5 Corp S~ares BAKErSFiELd. CALiFOENIA 9330~
(~05) 8~4-2711 -- ........
I~05) ~MT C/O
STO~E ~ ~ ~ PH~N~ ~ FE~N~HI~EE ~TO~E AOO~ESS FORH OATE
t3932F 40124 32~-50~1 .... ;~dy ~ri_eoly .................... 2551Cheste.~_Lan~., Oak/d, ~04 ........ 1176 ....
17~2~ i7~4~ 3.]i-.~0~3 Gas ali Le~endecker 310t Stockdale Hwy., Bakid, 93309 ii~ 01117i~5
!o:~: 72273 ~3-~7,)C. ~as ~ert ~eizer 300 Nort~ Chester, 8akfd. ~308 4/88 09/06/~8
L~72:T i7i21 ;24-413i Corperation I200 h Street, ~akid. ~301 04i24186
2i4.%a t~i7 .522-~;71 3i~ Tod ~ Freda ~awles 1700 ~runOage Lane~ ~ak{d. ~3i04 ~i7~ 01107i80
· ~.-,~. gas Corporation 2636 ~twr iivd., ~t[{d, ~SSO5 05i22i~5
2%47~ 252~ 5~-Oi~i aa~ Terry i Kathy Sto~es ~90 Roseaaie Hwy.~ 8akfd. ~3307 6/83 0110~184
2~SON 4675 ~22-8487 Corooration 120 ~runoage Lane, Biked. 9S304 02i2Si89
2a599B 50~4 J6~-47G~ ~as lin Oasntiaour 6529 E. Brunaage Ln., Baifd. B3~07 6iG6 06/I5i87
~:Eva ~, =.~,-:,t~ Velaai=ir ~ Shania Badaii i700 S. Chester, Bikfd..~3307 4i8~ 05/i~188
17721
£o7~'1 2144~
27~22 2659;
CLEVEn ..
November 20, 1986
o . ,,:.~.: " ..,¥
Kern County Health Department
1 700 Flower Street
B~ersfield, Calif. 93305 '~)~.
At,n: Mr. Joe Canas
Dear Mr. Canas,
I would like to tha~ you for approving our Store Gasoline Report that
is to be used in lieu of your Inventory Recording Sheet and Inventory
Reconciliation Sheet. As per our ~eting wi~ you on Nove~er 13, 1986,
your Inventory Reconciliation Sugary and Trend Analysis Worksheet will
still be completed by our stores.
Enclosed are ten(lO) copies of our report ~at you can distribute to
your field personnel. The nu~ers that appear in high-light areas
correspond to the colu~ headings on your Inventory Recording Sheet and
Inventory Reconciliation Sheet.
Again,· tha~ you for your time and attention. If you have any questions,
or if we can be of assistance to you, please let us know.
Division Gasoline Sales Manager
Western Pacific Division
SH:jas
cc: Jack Doolittle
7-Eleven Stores/Western Pacific Division
1240 South State College Blvd./Suite 100/P.O. Box 6520/Anaheim, California 92806/Phone (714) 635-7711
~.') CORPORATION
ST(~RE GASOLINE REPORT
r.u~#r, .[ A.M.
~"ATION ,,. STORE NO. DISTRICT DATE: TIME: P.M.
i!! SECTION I - DALLY SALES
Gallon ti REGULAR PUMP Per Gallon PUMP Jif Applicable)
ail I GALLONS (Tenths) AMOUNT (Cents) Retail ii GA LLONS (Tenths) AMOUNT {CentsJ
:urrent Readipg
,, I 10. Current Reading
I 11. Yesterday's ading
· esterday's R ading I
- I
;ub Total 'f) I Sub Total
-ess Meter Ch I
ck ~ Less Meter Check
?Dial Sold 01 ~ i
,I 12. Total Sold *
Gallon I Per Gallon
iii NO-LEAD PUMP Retail PUMP {If Applicable)
' ]urrent Readi~g. desterda¥,s i;e" Ii 1$ I$ I
I
iI I 13' Current Reading !
R qading II 14. Yesterday's ading II
~ub Total Ii $ii Sub Total
_ess Meter Ch'~ck j I
~1 I Less Meter Check I
total Sold 627 I 15. Total Sold * I ,
Gallon I' ~ Per Gallon J '
'ail ~ PREMIUM PUMP Retail PUMP (If Applicable)
2urrent Readi, ng i I 16. Current Reading
I
I
Yesterday's eading I 17. Yesterday's ad}ag I
I I
Sub Total I Sub Total I
I I
Less Meter C, heck I Less Meter Check
I 18. Total Sold * [ I
Total Sold 61 $ , ;
HIS AREA CAN 8E USED FOR DIESEL .Code 635, GASOHOL.Code 604, SUPER NO LEAD.Code 607. $ I
!, I
~ REGULAR,, NO LEAD PREMIUM OTHER
~! 1, I~'EGINNING INVENTORY;~ + ~- 4- 4
>. 2. I~ELIVERIES (ATTACH Dt~LIVERY PAPERS) 12 12 12
O 3. tOTAL (LINE 1 AND 2) i
4. GALLONS SOLD iMETEREO) (--) g' + ~ $,+ g
->1 ~1 ! = 14 or 15 14 or 15 14 or 15 14 or 15
~Z, 5. (~NVENTORYON HAND ~
Or, !,
~Z, 6. I'~VENTORY IN TANK (A~TUAL) 4 4 4 4
i (+) 16 16 16 16
7.
OVER
(SHORT)
.j 8. ESTERDAY'S MONTH.T~)-DATE OVER/'(SHORT) t-F) 1F~ [. ~6 16 ~6,,, , ,
u~ 9. CURRENT MONTH-TO-D4TE OVER/ISHORT) = 16 I 16 16
(3>. 10. ~URRENT(TODAY'S) STiCK READING (INCHES) .:1 IN, ] IN.: 3 IN. .~ IN.
~ 11, ~VATER INTANK-STICK!READING (INCHES) 13 ~N. 13 IN., 13 iN. 13 ~N.
~LOSINGGASOLINE + i OPENING GASOLINE SALES RECORDED_
O, 12. REGISTER READING REGISTER READING -- ON REGISTER -
!i i INVENTORY GALLONS
INVENTORY BE~:ORE DELIVERY DELIVERY AFTER DELIVERY OVER ~ GASOLINE AUDIT
~ PUMP
i! METER INCHES GALLONS GALLONS INCHES GALLONS (SHORT) ~ GALLONS Over/IShor~)
On Delivery
!i READING !
I-O REGULAR 4 i 10 10 12 11 ii [ 12~1 REGULAR '603
NOIiLEAD 4 '10 i0 12 11 11
i~ i, : i~ ~u:NO LEAD 629
PRfMIUM 4 ~ 10 I0 12 ii II ,~ z PREMIUM :616i
~.~_ DIESEL 4 10 10 12 11 11 ~ DIESEL 637i
~1.~ : ~ > GASOHOL 606!
~ GASOHOL 4 _ i0 i0 12 ii i1 -
~, z i .,
SUPER ~ O SUPER
I
NOiLEAD 4 ~ 10 10 12 11 11 ~ ~ NO LEAD 609
Split Load To Store __ Split Load From Store
GAIJLONS COST OF G nI.LONS
DELIVERED DELIVERIES UNITS COST P.O. NUMBER DELIVEREIJ BILL OF LADING
(FOR INVENTORY DOLLARS (CENTS) CENTS/GALS. (FOR TAXES)
N( LEADI'1 ', : , i
'628' i , ,
I I
D,?EZ 16361 i
GA, SO,OL : !
suPER ~ ~ '
T}TAL 16301,-.o- o~.,~... ,' '..~.--o --,.-.."'"".
i VENDOR NO. VENDOR AMOUNT P.O. NUMBER VENOOR NO. VENDOR AMOUNT P.O, NUMBER
165o1 .... 1 , 16~°l
· TANK AND LOCATION DATA ' / ,/ Page 2
¢ WEATHER J, TI~E TEMPERATURE COMMENTS
BEFCJRE 'EST _ [ "
AFTER T~ST -
EVEL . .~.Fill . Gauge Gauge .~ill J.. Gauge Fill Gauge "'Fili Gauge
" · .;~t ~:...'~ ":.... ~ ~ "'~'. ,.
~"~-V VENT VALVE TYPE ,,., .1 " , ,'
REPLACEMENT PARTS: PART ~ DESCRIPTION QUANTITY, PRICE
~ ,, , '~,.~ , ~ ~; ? ~ , .
ADDITIONAL CHARGES: ;(pumpovers, overtime, etc.)
*Data obtained from ~ Station ~ LL Charts ~ Other
le okat°
ENIrIRONMENTAL S~RVICF.~ INC, O^T E oF T EsT
,,5 DEWA£r ~VENUE. N.W. '~' ~';;~TEs1~ ..... : . / ("
~U/TE 4~ r
CANTON, OH $4702 ; R ESU LTS CO.T
21~453-1800 ~ 8~523-4370
~USTOM~'R,'~ ~ ",
LocATI~--JDE~TIFIC~TION NUMBER NAME "'
~c,~;~ rS~ ,o/ ~:~ D'7l,:,(r~ ~ ~ .?,, ~. :,. < ,~.-,':...'/"'~} ~:" ,,,,:?
~ } TEsT RESULTS SUMMARY
. SYSTEM TANK SIZE WATER LEAK LOKATOR RESULTS- CONCL. COOl
PRODUCT GALLONS DIA/MAT~ INCHES LEVEL. ALR
INCHES Gp~ CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS ~EST ~ANK
IbTHEfi INFORMATION ~ ............
~ ~ PRODUCT LINES - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST RESULT8
SYSTEM TYPE OF PUMP PRODUCT pRODUcT
'" ' ~ : ' ' ~ MINUTES LOSS LOSS CONCLUSION/
[NO. PRODUCT REMOTE SUCTION APPLIED APPLIED CC'S GPH RESULT
~OT~: On ~ueflon ~t~m~, ~V~ put mor~ than 1~ p~l on an~ pump
OTHER CON~RgCTOR$, OFFICIA~,.'CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT
~ ' DETAIL OF TEST RESULTS
'~ T~MPERATURE ABSOLUTE
TEST .'; TIME LEAK RATE .
SYSTEM
TEST
LEVEL
CLO~ OUfiATION CC/DIV CC/MIN ~ o F CC/MIN CC/MIN GPH
No, PRODUCT NO. (INCHES) START HRS.-MIN.
/
~ / /~ ~ ~,';-.', c ~/ '3, ;:;-"., .....
, .....
Zc./~'~-- .. i ..
,,
' LEVEL - ~CHE~ FRO~ TANK BOTTOM TO TE~T LEVEL
CONCLUStlON - NFPA 329 CRITERION OF ~0.05 GPH IS USED TO CERTIFY TIGHTNESS
~iS IS tO certify that the above described tank systems were tested, using the HUNTER ENVl RONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC. LEAK LOKATOR according to all standard operating procedures. Thee indicated
system meetthe-criterion-established by the National Fire Pr~fecti~ A~i~iation Pamphlet, 329 for Precision Testing. '
TEST var TESTING SEECIALIST SI,~TUR~/ DATE
,. FILE CONTENTS
t ~J~Permit to Operate ! (~OD/~ Date ~
~Const~uction Permit J Date
~Permit to abandon~ -No. Of Tanks Date
~ended Permit Conditions
~Permit Appticati-on Form, ~ Tank Sheet's', PI~ ~gns;
.... ~_ ...... ~-A ppis-fca: i on-:~to-- Aba nd o n=-===-=- ........ ~--.-~-t an k s(-s) =~ . ......... Date ........
~Ann'ual Report Forms
~Copy ,0f W~itten Contract Between Owner & Operator ......
~Inspection Reports ,
....... :--~Correspondence ~- Received ......................................... '-
: .' Date
~Cor res~ndence' - Mailed
' ~.
- ' : ..... Date .....
~Unauthot[zt~ Rl~elle Reportl ....
~Abandonment/C~olutl Rlpottl
~ Sampl ~ ng/~ab
~NV~ C~pl[anct Check (New Coni'ttuct[on CheCklist) '
~D Cmp~[a~=t Check (New Conattuct[on Checkl[at)
~NV~ P~an Check (New Conlttuct[on}
~S~D Plan Check (New Con.truction) '
~NV~ Plan Check (~x[~ting
~B~D Plan Che=k (Existing ~ac[l[ty)
~Perm~t Appl~cation Checklist
~Tightness Test Results Date
Da te
~Moaito[l~ Well ConstructiOn Data/P~rmits ....
~Enviro~ental Sensitivity Data~ '-
GroundwatetDrilling, Botlng Logs
Location of Water We-Ils
~Statement of Underground Conduits
~Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
~Photos ~Construction Drawings Location= ~'/~
~Half sheet showing date teceived and tally of inspection time, ~tc
~Hi scel laneous
· t [700 Flower Street KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPART 'i HEALTH OFFICER
Bakersfield, California 93305 r Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
Telephone (805)861-3636 ,. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
· ~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
~ Vernon S. Relchard ~
TO OPERATE = '-986
UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES
7 ELEVEN 2125-23446 [ THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION
2300 COLUMBUS AVENUE ~ 1240 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE
...~ "' BAKERSFIELD, CA ~ ANAHEIM, CA 92806 j?:::..?/.
· '-',,.TANK # AGE(IN YRS) SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING?
NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING. ~ ·
, AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT ..
NON--TRANSFERABLE * * * POST ON PREMISES
DATE PERMIT MAIT,V.D: AUG ~ 5 1986
DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED:
ern County Health Department~. Permit
ivision on Enviro~en~l Hea~ A~lication
700 Flo~r Street, Bakersfield, ~ 93305
~LI~TION ~R PE~IT ~ OPE~TE ~E~R~
~~US SUBST~CES S~E FACILI~
~ of"Application (ch~k):
~Ne~ Facii'ity ~ification of Facility ~istt~ Facility ~ansfer of ~ership
~ergen~ 24-~ur Contact (~e, area c~e, ~one): ~ ~~~
Nigh~
~ of B~iness
Is T~k(s) ~cat~ on ~ ~ric~ltural Fa~? ~Y~ ~ ~ri~)-'~
Is ~nk(s) Us~ ~i~rily for ~ri~tural ~r~ses? ~Yes
Facility ~dre~ ~3~O ~~8~ Nearest Cro~
T R SEC (R~al ~atio~
~er : ~ Con.ct ~r~
~dress . p ~ ~le~ne
~dress "' Zip -. Tele~one'
.~r ~ Facili~ Provid~ by ~p~ ~' Gro~~r
~il ~racteristics' at ~cilitY
~sis for Soil ~ ~ Gro~ter ~p~ ~t~mi~tio~ ....
. Contractor ~ ~ntractor' s ~ce~e
~rker's C~~ti~ Certi~icati~ $ I~urer
Pro~
:. T~(s) S~re (~k all ~t a~ly):
Ta~ ~ . ~s~ Pr~u~ ~tor Vehicle Unlead~ R~ular Pr~i~ Di~l ~ste
"
'. ~i~l ~siti~ of ~terials Stor~ (~t ~es~ry for ~tor v~icle ~ls)
(if different)
;. Transfer of Ownership
Bate of Transfer Previous Owner
Previous Facility Name
I, accept fuily all o61igatiohs o'f Pe'rmit N~. issued to
. I understand that the Permitting Authority may rJeview
modify or terminate the' transfer of the permit
....... fa-¢ilfff¥-'-~'pon 'receiving-thfS'-~ecmplet'~' f~-m~-
This form has been ccmp~leted under penalty of perjury and to the best- of my knowledge is
true and correct. /! j ~ ..~
TANK ~ , (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM , .H TANK)
' ~ F~R F.~CH ~ECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
~. 1. Tank is: [~Vaulte~ []Non-Vaulted []Double-Wall []Single-Wall
2. ~ Material'
[]Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel []Polyvinyl Chloride []Fiberglass-Clad steel
[] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~mlin~m~ [] Bronze []Unkr~wn
[] Other (describe)
3.' Primary Containment
Date In.s.talled Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufac~:urer
Tank S4c~ndary Contaim~ent
[]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner []Lined Vault []None
[-]Other (describe): Manufacturer:
V1Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
5. Tank Interior Lining
~Rubber []Alkyd VTE~oxy VlPhenolic []Glass []Clay ~t~lined
[]Other (describe):
.......... 6 .... Tank Corrosion Protection .............................................. ~
---~Galvanized ~ass-Clad V]Pol~thylene Wrap []Vinyl Wral~ln~
[]Tar or Asphalt ~Unkno~n r~None [~]Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: ~None [~Impressed Current System Vlsacrifi¢ial ~ System
[~e--s~ribe System & Equipment:
7. Leak Detection, Monitorir~, and Interception
a. Tank: r~visual (vaulted tanks only) VTGrour~ater Monitoring' Wall(s)
[]Vadose Zone ~4onitorir~] Well(s) VTU-Tube Without Liner
U-Tube with C~mpatible Liner Directi~ Flow to Monitorir~] Wall(s)*
F7 Liquid Retrieval & .Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Wall or ~uular Space
TPail¥ Gauqing & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightnes~ Testin~
None [] Unkno~ [~ Other
Piping: ~ Flow-Bestricting Leak Detector(s} for Pressurized Pipir~]'
['7Monitoring S~p with R~ce~¥ '[]Sealed Concrete Rece~m¥
[]Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Race~a¥ FTSynthetic Liner llace~m¥
F7 Unknown [] Other
'Describe Make & Model: ~D
8.
~en Tiqhtness Tested? [~]Yes []No
Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test
Test Name Testing C~npany
9. Tank Repair
Tenk Repaired? []Yes
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Descr i he .Repai rs '
10. Overfill Protection
~i~Operator FillS, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
~Tape Float Gau~e []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
B ~apacitance Sensor ~Sealed Fill Box F]None []Unkno~
Other: List Make & Model For A~ove Devices
a. Under, round Piping: ~lYes [~No [~tlnkno~n Material
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
[]Pressure .[]Suction ..... []Gr_~_v__ity_~.Appr0xi_ma.te_~_.Leng_th_gf
............... b~ -un~ergrsun~- Piping corrosion Protection :
DGalvanized []Fiberglass-Clad ~]lmpressed Current FTSacrificial Anode
[']Polyethylene Wrap ~]Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wrap ~]Tar or Asphalt
~Unknown []None [~]Other (describe):
c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment:
F]Double-~all F] synthetic Liner System ~None [~Unkno~n
[[]Other (describe):
TANK ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM .H TANK)
F~R '~AcH 'S'ECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
~. 1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted ~Non-Vaulted ~]Double-Wall ~Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
~j~Carbon steel [] Stainless Steel [~Polyvinyl Chloride [']Fiberglass-Clad Steel
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~in~n [] Bronze ~lUnknown
Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. Tank-Secondary C. ontair~ent
[1Double-Wall DSynthetic Liner [1LinedVault []None []Unknown
~lOther (describe): Manufacturer: ~>~
[]Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
5. Tank Interior Lining
~Rubber []Alkyd ~TEpoxy Ulmenolic U]Glass DClay ~U~linad
'~lOther (describe):
...... 6. --Tank-Corrosion Protectioh' ' ' ......
-']~Galvanized "~'~-~ass-Clad []Pol~th¥1ene Wrap ~lVin¥1 Wra[~plng
[~Tar or Asphalt ~Unkno~ ~None DOther (describe):
Cathodic Protection: ~None [~Impressed Current System ~Sacrificial ~ System
Describe System & Equi~nent: "
7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interce?tion
a. Tank: [~Visual (vaulted tanks only) [2]Groundwater Monitorir~' Well(s)
[-~Vadose Zone Monitorir~ Well(s) ~]U-Tube Without Liner
U-Tube with Compatible L~ner Directirg Flow to Monitorin~ We.il(s)*
Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivity[ Sensor'
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank- ·
[1 Liquid Betrieval & Inspection Fr~u U-Tube, Monitorir~] Well or Afmular S~ace
? Daily Gaugir~ & I~nventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tight~le~
None [] U~known [] Other
b. Pi[;ir~: ~ Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'
[']Monitoring S,-np with ~ace%~y '~Sealed Concrete Race~y
' []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner Race%my []l~one
[]Unknown [] Other
· Describe Make & Model: ~ ~T' ' '
8.
~en Tightness Tested? DYes ~)No []Unknown
Date of Last Tightness Test · Results of Test
Test Name Testirg Company
9. Tank Re~air
Tank Repaired? []Yes []No U1Unknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs '.-
10. Overfill Protection '
~i~Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors r~vel
[]Tape Float Gau~e [']Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls Capacitance Sensor' []Sealed Fill Box []None
Other: List Make & Model ~or Above De~ices
Ii. Piping
a. t~derground Piping: []Yes []No DUnknown Material
Thickness (inches) ~iameter Manufacturer
............ ~Pressure._. DSuctlon _DGravity ...Approximate _Length. of. Pipe
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
~TGalvanized ['TFiberglass-Clad [']Impressed Current Dsecrifi¢ial
[]Polyethylen~ wrap DElectrical Isolation ~vin¥1 wrap [TTar or Asphalt
[~Unknown ~None F~Other (describe):
c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contair~ent:
[~Double-Wall ~]Synthetic Liner Syste~ ~None
[7Other (describe):
TANK ~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FO R _~ TANK)
--F~R EACH SECTI6N, ~HECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
H. 1. Tank is: [-~vaulted ~Non-Vaulted []Double-Wall ~Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
~Carbon Steel [] stainlesm Steel []P°lyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel
[] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~inum [] Bronze ['~Unknown
[] Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment
Date Insta'lled 'Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
le- - <l i-o o ....... .........
4. Tank S~6ondary Containment
[1Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner [1Lined Vault ~None []Unkno~
FTOther (describe): Manufacturer:
~lMaterial Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
5. Tank Interior ~
--~Rubber •Al~d OE~ox~ Omen•lie OGlass OCla~ ~t~linad •t~Jmo~
OOther (describe): .....
~ ....... 6. Tan~ Corrosion Protection ~ ~
'--~Gai~an.ized' ~ass-Clad OPolyethylene Wrap •Vinyl Wral~lnq
· ['1Tar or Asphalt ~Unkno~n FTNone []Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: ~]None ~]Impressed Current System ~lSacrfficl~l' A~ode"' System'
Describ~ System & Equi~aent: "
7. Leak Detection, Moni. tqrin~, and Interception
a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) ~lGr°Undwater Monitoring' W~ll(s)
[2]Vadose Zone Monitorin9 ~ll(s) FTU-Tube Without Liner
U -Tube with C~m. patible Liner Directing Flow to Monitorir~ h~ll(s)*
Vapor Datector' [~ Liquid Level Sensor* ~'Conductivit~ Sensor* ·
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank-
[] Liquid l~etrie~al & Inspection ~r~m U-Tube, Monitoring Wmll or Annular
~ Daily Gauging & Inventory Rmconciliation ~Periodic Tightnsss Trusting
~. piping: ~ Flo~-Restricting Leak Datector(s) '~°r Press~ri'zed Piping'
O ~onitoring Strip with Race~ey ' 0 Sealed Co~crete Race~,a¥
I'll~lf-Cut ¢~patible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner l~ce~a¥
•'Unknown [] Other ......
'Describe ~t~ke & ~xlel~' ' ~D ~T' ...........
8.
~en Tightness Tested? ['~Yes. ~No []Unkno~
Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test
Test Name Testing C~mpan¥
9. Tank Re~air
~ ~'ir~r~ []Yes ~No
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs .
10. Overfill Protection
~Operator F~, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
[]Tape Float Gauqe []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
Capacitance Sensor ~]sealed Fill Bo~ []None [~Unkno~
Other: List Make. & Model ~o~ Above Devices
11.' Piping
a. t~derground Piping: ~lyes []No C]Unkno~ Material ~
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
. ~]Pressure [-]Suction'" [-]Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe "lam ~[~J~~
..... b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
· []Galvanized []Fiberqlass-Clad [2]Im[xessed Current []Sacrificial Anode
[.']Polyethylene Wrap C]Electrical Isolatim []Vinyl Wrap []Tar or Asphalt
~Unkno~l []None []Other (describe):
c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment:
[~Double-Wall [~Synthetic Liner System ~None []Unknown
~Other (describe):
~ ; · PER~IT CHECKLIST
Facility 7-Eleven Store #2125-23446 Permit # 090018C
This checklist is provided to ensure that ali necessary packet enclosures were received
and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided
within 30 ~ of receipt.
Check:
Yes No
A[ The packet I received contained:
X ~ 1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase 'I Interim Permit
Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement Between Owner and
Operator.),. ...... Chapter.-15 '-(KCOC -#G-394I); ..... Expfanatio~ ~o.f Substance ...... Codes,
Equipment Lists and'Return Envelope.
~ 2) Standard Inventory Control ~onitoring Handbook #UT-lO.
X 3) The Following ~orms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet
b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
~ 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility)
X B. I have examined the information on my Interim .Permit, Phase I ~onitoring
Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between O~ner and Operator), and
find owner's name. and address, facility name and address, operator's name and
address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet).
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s)
3) ~ater-finding paste
~ X. D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to
Agreements between Owner and .Operator and hereby state that the owner of this
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between
owner and operator).
X E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed on permit).
X,.. F. As. required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-lO, all meters at this facility have had
calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered
device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"~eter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook),
× . fi. Standard Inventory Control ~onitoring was started at this facility in accordance
with procedures described in Handbook #UT-lC.
Date Started Oct. 13, 1986
"- Signature of Person Completin~ Checklist:
Title: Division Gasoline Secretary
Date: Oct. 1~ 1986
-.-.............' .................. .',;-'~;; ......................... . ..
for 95" diam. x 384" shell length
12, 000 gallon horizontal tank
Depth Depth Depth
in in in
Inches Gallons In che s Gallons Inches Gallons
953 12032
95 I1B55 63 "8297 31 3339
94 ~ 11810 .62 8147 30 3192
93 11774 6 t 799.~_ ................. 29 ...................... 3,046 ....................
92 11 ?3a 60 7844 28 .2901
91 11665 59 7692 27 2758
90 11601 58 · 7536 26' 2616
89 11526 57 7382 25 2476
88 11444 56 7226 24 2338
87 11357 55 7071 23 2201
86 11265 ~ 6919 az 2067
85 11166 ':, 6758 Z1 1935
84 11067 &(-, ;.~1 Z0 1805
83 10962 '_~ t44 19 1678
82 10853 5,: ', 286 18 1553
81 10741 49 61,28 17 ;' 1430
80 10625 48 5970 16 1311
79 10496 47 5813 15 1194
78 10385 46 5655 14 1080
77 10261 45 5497 13 970
76 ' 10133 44 5339 IZ 836
75 10004 .43 51 82 11 760
74 9872 42 5025 10 661
73 9738 41 '4865 9 566
72 9602 40 4712 8 476
71 9463 39 4557 7 391
70 9323 38 440{. *' 6 311
69 9181 37 42,~-; 5 238
/68 9038 36 4093 4 169
67 8892 35 394', 3 111'
66 8746 34 .... .3787 ........... Z ....... 61 -
65 8~97 33 ',6:~8 1 22
64 8448 32
District %__ Store % 23445 Consigned Gasoline
Letter Code: B August 1, 1986
CALIFORNIA OWNER/OPERATOR AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this day
of September 1986, by and between THE SOUTHLAND
CORPORATION .... , ~a~-Texas --corporation
Haskell Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75204,
and Ron J. and $~dy A. Knight ('Franchisee"),
2300 Columbus. Bakersfield ,
California 93305 ..
~HEREAS, Southland is the .owner of, and Franchisee is the
operator of, underground storage tanks at a retail motOr-fuels'
....................... outlet·-located ~at ......... 2300 Columbu~.-Ra~mr~·.]~
California 93~06 ("the outlet').
WHEREAS,' Franchisee sells gasoline at the outlet on
consignment from Southland pursuant .to a Consigned Gasoline
Addendum dated August 15~ 198~ . .
WHEREAS, Southland's and Franchisee's respective ownership and
operation of underground storage tanks are subject to Chapter
6.7 of Division 20 of the California Health and Safety Code
(the'Act") and regulations promulgated thereunder and codified
in Subchapter 16 of Chapter 3, Title 23, California
Administrative Code (the 'Regulations").
WHEREAS, Section 25293 of the Act and Section 2610 (b) of the
Regulations provide that if there is an operator of
underground storage tanks at a facility who is not the owner
of said tanks , the owner shall enter into a written contract
with that operator to perform certain responsibilities under
the Act and the Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of he premises and of the
mutual promises and covenants contained..herein.,
good and 'valuable conslderataon, .the~·rece~pt and~.'suffxc~ency
of which are hereby' acknowledged, .the parties.· agree as
follows:
1. This Agreement shall- commence on SeDtember ~. 1-986 ,
1986, and shall continue until expiration or termination of
the Consigned Gasoline Addendum between the parties.
2. Franchisee shall monitor the underground storage tanks at
the outlet in accordance with Section 2644 of the Regulations
and any applicable permit, rule or order issued pursuant to
the Regulations.
3. Franchisee shall maintain appropriate records in
accordance with .Section 2712 of the Regulations and any
applicable permit, rule or order issued pursuant to the
Regulations.
4. Franchisee shall implement reporting procedures as
required by any permit, rule or order issued pursuant to the
Regulations.
5. At~ its expense, Southland agrees to train Franchisee in
the monitoring of the underground storage tanks, the
maintenance of appropriate records and the implementation of
reporting, procedures as set forth in-paragraphs
this Agreement, and Franchisee agrees to attend such training.
6. Southland shall properly close the underground tanks at
the outlet as' required by any permit, .rule or order issued
,pursuant to the Regulations.
7. Southland shall properly indemnify Franchisee against any
......... liability for--civil .-penalties ..... assessed as ..... a
Franchisee's failure ~o comply with the Act or Regulations,
except that no indemnification shall be provided where the
noncompliance is caused in whole or in part by Franchisee's
negligence or willful misconduct.
8. This Agreement shall not be modified, altered, amended or
revoked except in writing duly executed by the parties.
9. A breach of this Agreement by Franchisee shall not
constitute a ground for termination to nonrenewal of the 7-
Eleven Store Franchise Agreement by and between Franchisee and
Southland, unless the breach is otherwise a breach of the 7-
Eleven Store Franchise Agreement.
10. In the event of a dispute or contYoversy arising out of
this Agreement or the breach thereof, the arbitration
provisions of the 7-Eleven Store Franchise Agreement shall
apply.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first above written.
FRANCHISEE FRANCHISEE
/
! ..
.×,.,.,,./ ' , ..,
'."i'" .../- THE SoutHLAND CORPORATION
D~t~ict Manag~- ' BY:Division Manager
8/86