The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRISK MANAGEMENT September'24, 2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Mr. Eon Saylor ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Pacific Wood Preserving 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 5601 District Blvd VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 Bakersfield Ca 93313 SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Saylor: 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661)395-1349 This letter is to confirm that the violations noted in the inspection of your business,.Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield, conducted on June 26, PREVENTION SERVICES 2001, have been satisfactorily addressed. We.thank you for your prompt 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 attention in retuming your facility to compliance. VOICE (661)326-3951 - FAX (661)326.0576 If you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance in your ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES environmental regulations compliance, please do not hesitate to call us at 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 326-3979. VOICE (061) 320-3979 FAX (661)326-0576 Sincerely, TRAINING DIVISION ~ 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 39924697 ~" ' FAX (681) 399-5763 Director of Prevention Services REH/dm cc: Howard Wines "- B A K E R S F I E L D C ALIFORN. IA Hampton .Court Resident Dear : CITY COUNCIL As the Councilmember representing the Hampton Court area, I ~l'arvey L. Hall Mayor have been made aware of various health concerns by residents and former residents on that street. It has been nice to have the MarkSalvaggio opportunity to meet with several of you. Requests have been made V'~e-Mayor of me and the City to look into the situation to see if something can wardz be done to determine the cause of these concerns. This letter is to ]~maCa'~n bring you up to date about steps that have been taken to address wa,-,~ this issue. I am personally concerned about the health concerns you have expressed and have been working over the past few SusanM. Belnham weeks with City and County staff to make sure steps are being wa,~;~ taken to investigate this matter. Health issues are complex since them are many factors that determine each individual's health, such Mike Maggard W..r,~3 as heredity, lifestyle, and various environmental conditions at work and home. In addition, there am many agencies including Kern ~a~Couch .County, the State of California and the Federal Government'which Ward4 regulate and investigate environmental health concerns. I have been working with City and County staff to coordinate efforts with narolaW, m,-~on these agencies to look into any conditions under our jurisd!ction w,,r~s which could be contributing to the health concerns of the residents JacquieSullivan on Hampton Court. Unfortunately, due to the number of people Ward6 involved and complexity of this issue it has taken longer than I intended to get this information to you. However, I will do my best to keep you informed as we continue through the process. The City 'has taken several steps to addreSs this issue. The Water Department has completed testing of the water wells that serve this area and based on this testing has determined that these wells meet all current health standards. We are continuing to. sample the wells in the area to monitor the water quality in the. system, If you have any questions regarding the testing by the City please contact either, Water .Resources Manager, Gene Bogart or Water Resources Director, Florn Core, at 326-3715. In addition, myself and city staff have met with the County Health Officer, Dr. B.A. Jinadu and the County Director of Environmental 1501 Tmxtun Avenue · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (661) 326-3767 · Fax (661) 323-3780 Health, Mr. Steve McCalley to make them aware of your concerns and to coordinate the aCtivities, of the City and County regarding this matter. The County Environmental Health Department is investigating the health complaints. It also reviewed numerous documents and searched their records to determine if there had been any possible sources of contamination such as landfills-or wells in the area. None were found in the area of Hampton Court. They are continuing with a deliberate and cautious investigation-regarding any potential sources of contamination. The result of these efforts will be provided when they become available from the County. The County Health Officer has also advised us that in order to evaluate the medical histories of individuals currently living on Hampton Court and/or those who used to live on Hampton Court who were identified in the Channel 23 news story, those individuals would have to sign a medical records release or produce their medical records to the County Health Officer. If you are interested in providing your medical information you should contact Mr. Kirt Emery, MPH, Epidemiologist, Assistant Director of Disease Control at 868.0303. I appreciate your patience and consideration during this process. Upon the conclusion of this investigation, our findings will be provided to you. Sincerely, Jacquie Sullivan Councilmember Ward 6 cc. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Kern County Board of Supervisors Mr. Alan Tandy, City Manager Mr. Scott Jones, Kern County Administrative Officer Dr. B.A. Jinadu, County Health Officer Mr. Steve McCalley, Director Kern County Environmental Health Mr. Gene Bogart, Water Resources Manager Mr. Mel Byrd, Manager, California Water Service Co. Mailing List: Hampton Court Donna Robinson 5112 Hampton Court Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dorris Porter 5117 Hampton Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Lucy Rivas 5101 Hampton Court Bakersfield, CA 93309 Greg .Roach 5105 Hampton Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Rafael Guzman 5204 Hampton Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Marine Tacket 4401 Belle Terrace, Apt 57 Bakersfield CA 93309 Sue Waldon 1808 Faxon Avenue Bakersfield CA 93304 Lori Turner 3310 Center Street Bakersfield 93306 Cathy Maxwell 10013 Marco Polo Bakersfield, CA 39912 Dianne Sadler 5005 Evanston Ct. Bakersfield, CA 93309 WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GENE BOGART, Manager FLORN CORE, Water Resources Director PATRICK E. HAUPTMAN, Superintendent 326-3006 STEVE LAFOND, Forecasting and Records 326-3007 MAURICE RANDALL, Business Manager 326-3704 KERN RIVER DISPATCHER 326-3716 __:-'_..':. _. September 17, 2001 Dr. B. A. Jinadu, M.D. Mr. Steve McCalley County of Kern County of Kern Department of Health Services Environmental Health Services Department 1700 Flower Street 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 ' Bakersfield, CA 93305 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2370 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the analytical results of the water sampling from the home located at 5112 Hampton Court, Bakersfield, CA 93309. Note the "Sample Description" as "Kitchen" was taken from the above homeowners faucet (cold side) and the "Meter" sample was taken at the customer side of the curb connection point. The package includes the results from the travel blanks and the instrument calibration tests. Be advised the homeowner Donna Robison, Mrs. Maxine Tackett (another resident in the area) and KERO-TV are being provided the analysis of the sampled Water with additional information providing the current regulated MCL's of each constituent analyzed..' Sincerely, -'" GENE BOGART Manager Florn Core Director Attachment cc: John Stinson, Assistant City Manager ~RalpliHuey}:City Environmenial Services Mel Byrd, Cal Water Service 1000 BUENA VISTA ROAD · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93311 · (661) 326-3715 BSK^ ^L¥ CAL LABORATORIES Cover Letter Veronica Simion 09/04/2001 California Water Service Co. 1720 North First Street San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission Number: 2001080336 Dear Veronica Simion: BSK Analytical Laboratories adheres to a quality assurance plan that has been approved by the State of California Department of Health Services. Our Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) certification number is 1180. BSK Analytical Laboratories has prepared this certificate of m~alysis in response to your request for analytical services. All information was taken from your Chain of Custody or related correspondence. BSK completed all sample handling and analytical procedures ~vithin the Laboratory's standard acceptability criteria with any exceptions noted below. If additional clarification of any information is required, please contact our Client Services Department at (800)877-8310 or (559)497-2888. Sincerely, BSK An alytical Laboratories Authorizing Signature(s) · ?/J'uliane A~ ~' Ko Yang ~' Cynthia Piggrfan Organic Laboratory Supervisor Inorganic Laboratory Supervisor QA/QC Supervisor Addendum: Laboratory QC Report I of 1 1414 Stanislaus Street · Fresno, CA 93706~1623 · Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 · Fax 559-485-6935 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIIIII I I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis Call fornia Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Report Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comment s: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kitchen Time Sampled:. 0835 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 lnorganics Prep Analysis Anal;yte Method Result Units I'QL Dilution DLR Date Date Alkalinity (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B 96 mg/L 1 I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Aluminum (Al) EPA 200.7 ND rng/L 0.05 I 0.05 08/09/2001 08/16/2001 Anlimony (Sb) EPA 200.8 ND l~g/L " I 2 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Arsenic (As) EPA 200.8 ND [tg/L 2 I 2 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Barium (Ba) EPA 200.7 0.060 mg/L I).05 I 0.05 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Beryllium (Be) EPA 200.8 ND lag/L I I I 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Bicarbonale (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B 96 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Cadmium (Cd) EPA 200.8 ND ttg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Calcium (Ca) EPA 200.7 34 mg/L 0.1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Carbonate (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B ND mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Chloride (CI) EPA 300.0 12 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08108/2001 Chromium -Hexavalent (Crt6) EPA 218.6 1.0 [tg/L I I 08/07/2001 08/07/2001 Chromium - Total (Ct) EPA 200.8 1.0 pg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Color (A.P.H.A) SM 2120 B ND units I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Conductivity-Specific (EC) SM 2510B 290 [tmho/cm I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Copper (Cu) EPA 200.8 ND [tg/L 50 50 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Cyanide (CN) SM 4500-CN-F ND I~g/L 20 20 08/09/2001 08/09/2001 Fluoride EPA 300.0 0.10 mg/L 0.1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Hardness (as CaCO3) 1 O0 mg/L 1.0 1.0 08/17/2001 08/17/200 ! Hydroxide (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B ND mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Iron (Fe) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Langelier Index (Saturation Index) ND - N/A 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Lead (Pb) EPA 200.8 ND [tg/L 5 5 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Magnesium 0rig) EPA 200.7 4.7 mg/L 0. l 0. l 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Manganese(Mn) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0,01 0,01 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Mercury (Hg) EPA 200.8 ND pg/L 0.4 0.4 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Nickel (NJ) EPA 200.8 ND gg/L 10 10 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Nitrate (NO3) EPA 300.0 4.0 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Nitrite (NO2-N) EPA 300.0 ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Odor SM 2150 B 1.0 TON I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 mg/L:'Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Prdiminary result lxg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for commentx gg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~~m~~ 1 of 9 ANA YT ICA L D 1\ LABORATORIES Il III II I I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis. California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street R~po~Iss~e Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 951 12 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kitchen Time Sampled: 0835 Sample Conm~ents: Date Received: 08/07/2001 lnorganics Prep Analysis Anal},te Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Perchlorate (C104) EPA 314.0 ND pg/L 4 4 08/09/2001 08/10/2001 pH EPA 9040 7.4 STD N/A 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Potassium (K) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Selenium (Sc) - Total EPA 200.8 ND ytg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/14~200 I Silver(Ag) EPA 200.8 ND pg/L 10 10 08/0812001 08/14/2001 Sodium (Na) EPA 200.7 23 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Sulfate (SO4) EPA 300.0 19 mg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/0812001 Suffactants (MBAS) SM 5540-C ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/08/2001' Thallium(Ti) EPA 200.8 ND lag/L I I 08/08/2001 08/14/2001 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) SM 2540-C 160 mg/L 5 5 08/14/2001 08/15/2001 Turbidity SM 2130 B ND NTU 0.1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Zinc (Zn) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/16/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal)'te Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date 1,1 ,I,2-Tetrachloroethane' EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1 ,i,l-Trichloroethane. EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 ! .00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1, ! ,2.,2-Tetiachloroethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 l, 1,2-Trichloro- 1,2,2-Trifluoroet bane EPA 502.2 ND /ag/L 10.0 1.00 10.0 08/17/2001 08/1712001 1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/1712001 1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 i .00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 0811712001 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08)17/2001 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5' 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzen~e EPA 502.2 ND [ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichlorobenzen~e EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichloroethan¢ EPA 502.2 ND I~g/IL, 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichloropropan.e EPA 502.2 ND IJg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 rog/L: Mill/grams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result l~g/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. I~g/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by Extemal laborato~c %Rec: percent Recovered (surxogates) See External Laborato~] Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~B~~~~ 2 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485:6935 Veronica fiimion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street R~po. Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSKSubmission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Projecl Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comment s: samPle Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kilchen Time Sampled: 0835 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal)'te Method Result Units t'QL Dilution DLR Date Date 1,3,5-Trirnethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND ;tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3-Dichloroprgpane EPA 502.2 ND Itg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,4-Dichlorobenzen~ EPA 502.2 ND lig/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2,2-Dichloropropan.e EPA 502.2 ND ;~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND /~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Benzene EPA 502.2 ND !ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromobenzene EPA 502.2 ND /ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND ~lg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromodichloromethane EPA 502.2 ND !ug/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromoform EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromomethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloroethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/200'i Chloroform EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloromethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 cis-l,2-Dichioroethene EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 05 !.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND !ug/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0,5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromomethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 1 0 1.00 1.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethyl t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3 0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0 5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylenedibromide EPA 502.2 ND !ug/L 0 5 1.00 0.5 08/! 7/2001 08/17/2001 Hexachlorobuladiene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0 5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 l$opropylben.zene EPA 502.2 ND [~g/L 0 5 1.00 0.5 08/i 7/2001 08/I 7/2001 m,p-Xyleaes EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 05 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Methylene chloride EPA 502.2 ND Ilg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quanfitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time rog/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result lag/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comment~ lag/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laborato ,ry. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~l~l~~l~~ 3 of 9 BSK L A BO RATO RIES Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street · r~epo. Issue Dale: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 951 1 2 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSKSample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kitchen Timc Sampled: 0835 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte l~lethod Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Dale Date Methyl-t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Naphthalene EPA 502.2 ND iag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Butylben~ene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Propylben, zene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/I 7/2001 08/17/2001 o-Xylene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 p-lsopropyltoluene EPA 502.2 1SD IJg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 sec-Butylbe-nzene EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 St)ce.ne EPA 502.2 ND .gg/L .0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 t-Amyl Methyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND IJg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND [~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00' 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Toluene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Total 1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Trihalomethanes EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Tolal Xylene lsomers EPA 502.2 ND /ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 trans-i,2rDichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L .0.5 !.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Trichloroethene (TCE) EPA 502.2 ND lag& 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Tr/chloroflouromethane EPA 502.2 ND lag& 5.0 1.00 5.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Vinyl chloride EPA 502.2 ND lag& 0.5 1.00 0.5' 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromochloropropane EPA 504.1 ND pg/L 0.01 I 0.01 08/21/2001 08/28/2001 Ethyl~ned!bromide EPA 504.1 ND lag/L 0.02 I 0.02 08/21/2001 08/28/2001 Aldrin EPA 505 ND lag/L 0.075 I 0.075 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Chlordane EPA 5O5 ND lag/L 0.1 I 0.1 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 ' Chlorothhlonil (Daconil,Bravo) EPA 505 ND lag/L 5.0 I 5 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Dield,rin EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.02 I 0.02 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Endrin EPA 505 ND' lag/L 0. l 1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Hepta,chlor EPA 505 ND lag& 0.01 I 0.01 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Heptachlor epoxide EPA 505 ND lag/L 0.01 i 0.01 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Hexachlorobenzene EPA 505 ND pg& 0.50 I 0.5 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result lag/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. lag/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authenticat, ion Code: ~R~~~~ 4 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 LABORATORIES Veronica Simion Certificate of AnalYsis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Repo, Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comment s: , Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kitchen Time Sampled: 0835 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units ]'QL Dilution DLR Date Date Hexachlorocyclopentadiene EPA 505 ND [~g/L ! I 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Lindane EPA 505 ND pg/L I).2 0.2 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Meth0xychlor EPA 505 ND pg/L 'i0 10 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 PCBs: Arochlor Screen EPA 505 ND I~g/L 0.2 0.2 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Toxaphene EPA 505 ND ~g/L 1.0 I 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Tfifluralin EPA 505 ND lag/L 1.0 I 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 2,4,5-T EPA 515.1 ND pg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) EPA 515.1 ND [tg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 2,4-D EPA 515.1 ND [tg/L 0.1 0. l 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Benlazon (Basagran) EPA 515.1 ND pg/L L0 2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Dalapon EPA 515.1 ND I~g/L 1.0 I 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Dicamba (Banvel) EPA 515.1 ND Iag/L D.081 0.081 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Dino~eb (DNBP) EPA 515.1 ND p.g/L D.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/200 l Pentachlorophenol (PCP) EPA 515.1 ND pg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Picloram EPA 515.1 ND pg/L 0.1 0.1 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Alachlor (Alanex) EPA 525 ND pg/L 1.0 1 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Atrazihe (AAtrex) EPA 525 ND pg/L 1.0 I 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.1 0.I 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipale EPA 525 ND pg/L 3.0 I 3 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 · bis(2-cthylhexyl) phthalate EPA 525 ND pg/L 3.0 I 3 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Bromacil (Hyvar) EPA 525 ND pg/L 10 I 10 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Butachlor EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.38 I 0.38 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Diazigon EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.25 I 0.25 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Dimethoate (Cygon) EPA 525 ND .pg/L 10 I 10 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Metolachlor EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Metribuzin EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Molinate (Ordram) EPA 525 ND pg/L 2.0 I 2 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Prometryn (Caparol) EPA 525 ND pg/L 2.0 I 2 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 h'opachlor EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Simazine (Princep) EPA 525 ND pg/L 1.0 I I 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitafion Limit It: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result gg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (,ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analys/sperformed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 of 9 BSK ^ ^ LABORATORIES I II I III Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate/11180 1 720 North First Street Repo~ lssue D~te: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131920 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submi ssion Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Kitchen Time Sampled: 0835 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal)'te Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Thiobcnca~b (Bolero) EPA 525 ND gg/L 1.0 1 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 3-Hydroxycarbofuran EPA 531 ND pg/L 3.0 3 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Aldicm:b EPA 531 ND ttg/L ,3.0 3 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Aldicarb Sulfone EPA 531 ND gg/L 4.0 4 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Aldicaib Sulfoxide EPA 531 ND gg/L 3.0 3 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Carbaryl EPA 531 ND pg/L 5.0 5 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Carb~furan EPA 531 ND pg/L 5.0 5 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Melhomyl EPA 531 ND pg/L 2.0 2 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Oxar~yl EPA 531 ND lag/L ' 20.0 20 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 Glyphosate EPA 547 ND pg/L 9.0 9 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Endgthall EPA 548 ND lag/L 45 45 08/13/2001 08/20/2001 Diqu, at EPA 549 ND pg/L 4 4 08/09/2001 08/13/2001 Diuron EPA 632 ND pg/L 1.0 I 08/09/2001 08/22/2001 .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 -Chloro-2-fluorobenzene EPA 502.2 100 % Rec 1.00 0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromoform EPA 504,1 137.8 % Rec I N/A 08/21/2001 08/28/2001 Tetrachloro-m-xylene EPA 505 110 % Rec I N/A 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 DCPAA EPA 515.1 95 % Rec I N/A 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 1,3-Dirnethyl-2-nitrobenzene EPA 525 120 %Rec I N/A . 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 BDMC EPA 531 84 %Rec I N/A 08/17/2001 08/27/2001 AMPA EPA 547 103.9 % Rec I N/A 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Benthiocarb EPA 632 63 % Rec I N/A 08/09/2001 08/22/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Prdiminary result }~g/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~m~l~l~~~l~ 6 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 BSI(ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. iELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Repo~ Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 951 12 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131923 Project ID: Projecl Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled:' 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Travel Blank (08/01/01) Time Sampled: Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units I'QL Dilution DLR Date Date l,l,l,2-Tetracbloroethane EPA 502.2 ND I.~g/L (;.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 I,l,l-Trichloroetbane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L £.5 1.00 0.5 08/1712001 08/17/2001 l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L £.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-Tritluoroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 10.0 1.00 10.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L ('.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 l,l-Dichloroeihane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,I-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L ('.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 l,l-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L £.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND !ag/L (:.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/1712001 1,2,4-Trichlo'robenzene EPA 502.2 BID pg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,4-lrimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND llg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L (:.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L (.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L (;.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L £~.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L (;.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND Ilg/L (;.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 12.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2-Chlorotoli~ene EPA 502.2 ND itg/L 13.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L (3.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Benzene EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 13.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromobenzene EPA 502.2 BID pg/L 13.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromochloromethane EPA 502.2 BID pg/L 12.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromodichloromethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 13.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromoform EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromomethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND /ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result /Jg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysisperformed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~~~ 7 of 9 · ~ ....... t-'~ O'~'wt',r' ~r"~'~' 'P,l.c..~cct~ ~13~ ~ooo ~'~ t"'A ~ 0"~"~ 0'2113 17~.. CtZO BSK LABORATORIES I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street R~port lssue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131923 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comment s: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Travel Blank (08/01/01) Ti~ne Sampled: Sample Comments:' Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Chloroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloroform EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 1.0 1.00 1.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 cis-l,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromomethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00' 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 1.0 1.00 1.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethyl t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/1 7/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylenedibromide EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 }lexachlorobutadienc EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Isopropylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 m,p-Xylenes EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Methylene chloride EPA 502.2 ND t~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/! 7/2001 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Naphthalene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 !.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Propylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 o-Xylene EPA 502.2 ND lug/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 p-lsopropyltoluene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 sec-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Styrene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 t-Amyl Methyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND !ag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/I 7/2001 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Toluene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Tolal 1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1 0.5 Total Trihalomethanes EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Xylene Isomers EPA 502.2 ND lug/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 rog/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time rog/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result lug/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments~ lug/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments, Report Authentication Code: IIIIIllllllll~lllllllll~l~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllmlllillllill 8 of 9 141,4 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street R~po~ Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 951 12 BSKSubmission #: 2001080336 BSK Sample ID #: 131923 Project ID: Projecl Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Dale Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Travel Blank (08/01/01) Time Sampled: Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal,~te Method Result Units I:QL Dilution DLR Dale Date lrans-l,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND }.tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/200] 08/17/2001 Trichloroethene ('I'CE) EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/1712001 08/17/2001 Trichloroflouromethane EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 5.0 1.00 5.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Vinyl chloride EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/171200] 08/17/2001 _s_ .................................................................................................................................................................. I -Chloro-2-fluorobenzeneEPA 502.2 100 % Rec 1.00 0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result pg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. !ag/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysisperformed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Reporl Authentication Code: IIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~II~IIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIII~IIIIIIll 9 of 9 LAB O R'ATO RI E S QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Dale Submitled: 08/07/2001 Projecl ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK SlarLims Run #: 24400 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I.st~t,~,~.t 1o: Analyst lnilials: MAR1AI~I Method Number: CR6_IC Analyte Results Matrix °A, Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Chromium - Hexavalenl (Cr~6) LCS N/A 10.25 pg/L 102 10 ND 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable ChromiUm - Hexavalent (Ct+6) LCSD N/A 9.95 [ug/L 99 3 10 ND 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable Chromium - Hexa'~alent (Cr~6) MS 131920 21.1 pg/L 100 20 !.0 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable Chromium - llexavalenl (Cr+6) MSD 131920 20.56 pg/L 97 2.6 20 1.0 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable Chromium - Ilexavalent (Cr46) RBLK N/~ ..... 0 I~g/L < I ! N/~ 08/07/0t Acceptable BSK SlarLims Run #: 24441 IIIIIII[IIIIIIIHIIIIlilIIIIIIIIII In~t,.,.,¢nl ID: COND1 Analyst Initials: Jl~M]{ Method Number: ALK Analyte Resnlts' Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Dale AIkalinily (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 96 mg/L 0 96 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 402 mg/L 0 400 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BJcarbonale (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 96 mg/L 0 96 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 13194 7 402 mg/L 0 400 30 N/A 08/08/0 i Acceptable Carbonate (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 13194 7 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Conductivity - Specific (EC) LDUP 131924 281pmho/c I 280 30 N/A 08/08/01 ,4cceptable LDUP 131947 1209pmho/c 0 1200 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Hydroxide (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/0 i Acceptable pH LDUP ! 3 ! 924 7.43 STD 0 7.4 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 7.38 STD 0 7.4 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable pH- D1 Extract LDUP . 131756 11.47 sir. Unit 0 11.5 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK SlarLimsRun #: 24472 IIIIIIIIIIHll]IIlIIIIIIIItlIIIII Instrument ID: ICl Analyst lnitials: PARANI,JITK Method Number: CL_iC Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Mat,'ix Analyte QC Type Spike ID 'Resull Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Chloride (Cl) LCS N/A 10. I mg/L I 0 i l 0 ND 130 70 08/08/0 } Acceptable Fluoride LCS N/A 0.72 mg/L 96 0.75 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate (NO3) LCS N/A 22.29 mg/L 100 22.14 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite (NO2-N) LCS N/A 0.5 mg/L 100 0.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) LCS N/A 38.35 mg/L 102 37.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (Cl) LCSD N/A 9.82 mg/L 98 2.9 10 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride LCSD N/A 0.77 mg/L 102 6.8 0.75 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MSfMSD Page I of 16 RPD: Relalive Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 ~ BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfiehl BSK SlarLims Run #: 24472 IIIIIllllllllllllllllllllll~llllll Inst!'ument ID: lC1 Analyst Initials: PARAMJITK Melhod Number: NO3_IC Analyle Results Matrix % Rec S pike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Nitrate (NO3) LCSD N/A 21.99 mg/L 99 1.3 22.14 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite (NO2-N) LCSD N/A 0.49 mg/L 98 2 0.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) LCSD N/A 37.94 mg/L 101 I 37.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (CI) MS 131920 32.28 mg/L 99 20 12 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride MS 13 t 920 1.7 mg/L 106 1.5 0. I 0 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate (NO3) IX,tS 131920 49.(~ mg/L 103 44.28 4.0 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite (NO2-N) M S 131920 0.92 mg/L 92 I ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfale (SO4) MS 131920 96.12 mg/L 103 75 19 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (C1) M SD 131920 32.44 mg/L 99 0.49 20 12 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride MSD 1:31920 1.7 mg/L 106 0.0 1.5 0.10 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrale {NO3) MSD 131920 49.84 mg/L 103 0.4 44.28 4.0 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nilrite {NO2-N) MSD 131920 0.9 mg/L 90 2.1 I ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfale {SOd) MSD 131920 96.32 mg/L 103 0.2 75 19 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (CI)-- RBLK N/A 0 mg/~ .... ~-I ........... I N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Nilrate (NO3) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < I I N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite {NO2-N') RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfale (SO4) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24489 Illlllllllffillllllllllllllll~ Instrument ID: Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Method Number: COLOR Analyte'Results Matrix % Rec gpike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Color (A.P.H.A) LDUP 131920 0 units N/A ND N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Odor LDUP 131920 I TON 0 1.0 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Turbidity LDUP 131920 0 NTU N/A ND N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24490 I1111111111111111111111111111111111 Im;trument ID: Analyst Initials: ROBERTC M,sthodNumber: MBAS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Surfactants (MBAS) LCS N/A 1.03 mg/L 103 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 OOS-High Surfactani$ (MBAS) LCSD N/A 1.05 mg/L 105 2 ! ND 102 81 08/08/01 OOS-High Surfactants (MBAS) MS 131920 0.9825 mg/L 98 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 Acceptable Surfactants {MBAS) MSD 131920 1.0205 mg/L 102 3.8 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 Acceptable %Ret: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background mat:rix for MS/MSD Page 2 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Resull Above UCL UCL: Uppfr Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit LABOI ATORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Waler Servi.ce Co. · Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Method Number: MBAS Analyte Resulls Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Uni~ or RPD RPD Cone Conc UCL LCL Date Suffactants (MBAS) RBLK N/A 0 m~L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 0g/0g/01 Acceptable Run Comments ~e LCS and LCSD recoveries were slighdy high, however associated samples were ND. BSK StarLims Run #: 24505 Illlllllllllllllllll~llllllltlllll ~.sm,.¢.t ID: GC4 Analyst lnidals: DAINB Method Number: 50,5 Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Aldrin LCS N/A 0.218 pg/L 87 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorolhalonil (DaconJI,Bravo) LCS N/A 2.015 ~lg/L 99 2.018 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin LCS N/A 0.209 llgtL 83 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin LCS N/A 0.214 pg/L 85 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heplachlor LCS N/A 0.218 pg/L 87 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heplachlor epoxide LCS N/A 0.21! pg/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene LCS N/A 0.818 Iag/L 81 I ND 130 70 08/09/01 ,4cceptable tlexachlorocyclopentadiene LCS N/A 1.416 pg/L 94 1.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane LCS N/A 0.209 pg/L 83 0.25 ND 130 '70 08/09/0 t ,4cceptable Methoxychlor LCS N/A 0.216 pg/L 86 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Aldrin LCSD N/A 0.209 lag/L 83 4.2 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorothalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) LCSD N/A 1.915 tag/L 76 5 2.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin LCSD N/A 0,198 p.g/L 79 5.4 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin LCSD N/A 0.194 pg/L 77 9.9 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Accept. able Beptachlor LCSD N/A 0.21 pg/L 84 3.8 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 ,4cceptable Heptachlor epoxide LCSD N/A 0.2 tag/L 80 5.3 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene LCSD N/A 0.783 lag/L 78 4.3 I ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorocyclopentadiene LCSD N/A !.406 pg/L 93 0.71 !.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane LCSD N/A 0.203 ~g/L 81 3 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor LCSD N/A 0.182 lag/L 72 17 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable AIdrin MS 130590 0.212 tag/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorothalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) MS 130590 1.882 pg/L 75 2.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin MS 130590 0.196 pg/L 78 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin MS 130590 0.197 pg/L 78 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor MS 130590 0.212 ~g/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heplachlor epoxide MS 130590 0.198 pg/L 79 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene MS 130590 0.806 ~g/L 80 I ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorocyclopentadiene MS 130590 IA76 }agJL 98 1.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane MS 130590 0.198 ~g/L 79 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor MS 130590 0A89 pg/L 75 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 3 of ! 6 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24505 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111 lnshumenl ID: GC4 Analyst Initials: D~B Meihod Number: 505 Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Malfix Analyle QCType SpikeID Result Units or ~D RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Aldfin RBLK N/A 0 H~L < 0.075 0.075 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlordane RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/09/01 4cceptable Chlorolhalonil (DaconiI,Bmvo) RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 5 5 N/A 08/09/01 4cceptable Dieldrin RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 0.02 0.02 N/A 08/09/01 ~ccep~able Endfin RBLK N/A 0 [l~L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 0.01 0.01 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor e~xidc RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 0.01 0.01 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorocyclopentadiene RBLK N/A 0 ~lg/L < I I N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane · RBLK N/A 0 ~l~L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor RBLK N/A 0 p~L < 10 10 N/A 08/09/01 ~cceptable PCBs:.Arochlor Screen RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Toxaphene RBLK N/A 0 H~L < I I N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Tfiflu~lin RB~ N/A 0 p~L < I I N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Surrogate Resnlts Analyte QC Type Surf. Result UCL LCL Dale Tetrachloro-m-xylene LCS N/A 74. ! % Rec 77 ! 30 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Tetrachlom-m-xylene LCSD N/A 68.5 %Rec 77 130 70 08/09/01 OOS-Low Tetrachloro-m-xylene MS 130590 75.9 % Rec 110 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Tetrachloro-m-xylene RBLK N/A 76.7 % Rec 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims R.. #: ]45~ II~l~l~lllllllllllllll~lll~ In;:tmment ID: PHI Analyst Initials: MATTM Method Number: CN_ISE Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc' UCL LCL Date Cyanide (CN) LCS N/A 0.2 gg/L 100 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/01 Acceptable Cyanide (CN) LCSD N/A 0.21 pg/L 104 4.9 .2 ND l 19 78 08/09/01 Acceptable Cyanide (CN) MS 131920 0.37 lag/L 185 .2 ND Il9 78 08/09/01 OOS-High Cyanide (CN) MSD 131920 0.40 I~g/L 200 7.8 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/0t OOS-High Cyanide (CN) RBLI~--- N/~ ....... -0 ' pg/L < 20 20 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Run Comments The MS and MSD recoveries were affected by the matrix. BSK StarLims Run #: 24571 IIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: HPLC1 Analyst Initials: TIMC l~ethodNumber: 547 %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background malrix for MS/MSD Page 4 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit LABO TORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24571 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111 Instrument ID: HPLC1 Analyst lnilials: TIMe Mcthod Nmnber: 547 Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units orRPD RPD ' Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Glyphosate LCS N/A 178 pg/L 89 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosale LCSD N/A 192 pg/L 96 7.6 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate MS 131374 178.5 ~g/L 89 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate MSD 131374 194.7 gg/L 97 8.7 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate . RBLK N/A · 0 pg/L < 9 9 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QCType Sum Resull UCL LCL Date AMPA LCS N/A 97 % Rec 95.8 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA LCSD N/A 98 % Rec 95.8 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA MS 131374 104.6 % Rcc 102.1 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA MSD 131374 101.7 % Rec 102.1 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA RBLK N/A 95.8 % Rec 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24574 IIIIIIIl}ltllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: lC1 Analyst Initials: MARIAM Method Number: CLO4_IC Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Unils orRPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Perchlorate (CIO4) Les N/A 31.04 lag/L 103 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) LCSD N/A 31.48 lag/L 104 1.4 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable ' Perchlorale (CIO4) MS 131073 32.9 pg/L 109 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable MS 132215 30.56 iJg/L 101 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) MSD 131073 30.32 gg/L 101 8.1 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable MSD 132215 29.94 ~ag~L 99 2 30 ND 130 70 0gl10/01 Acceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 4 -- -- 4 N/A 08/1~0/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24696 IIIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: HPLC2 Analyst Initials: TIMe Method Number: 549 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix . Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or PJ'D RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Diquat LC$ N/A 7.8 !ag/L 19 40 ND 137 I 08/13/01 Acceptable Diquat LCSD N/A 8.2 pg/L 20 5 40 ND 137 ! 08/13/01 Acceptable Diquat MS 131297 5.8 $~g/L 14 40 ND 137 I 08/13/01 Acceptable Diquat RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 4 4 N/A 08/13/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MSfMSD Page 5 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-HJgh: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK ^ N Ai y TIC AL LA B ORATOKI ES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Waler Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24714 Illl]ll~l]llll]lllllllll]]lllllll] Instrument ID: BALANCEI Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Me:hod Number: TDS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec S pike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) LDUP 131659 994 mg/L 4 1000 30 N/A 08/I 5/0 I' Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24728 IIIIIIIIIIIIlll~lllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: ICPWISI Analyst Initials: PARMINDERS Method Number: SB MS TS Analyte Resulls Matrix '% Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike lD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Antimony {Sb) LCS N/A 18.18 t~tg/L 90 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Arsenic {As) LCS N/A 19.61 pg/L 98 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Beryllium{Be) LCS N,'A 19.02 tag/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Cadmimn (Cd) LCS N/A 19.85 pg/L 99 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Chromium- Total (Cr} LCS N/A 20.18 pg/L 100 20 ND 120 80 08/14/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) LCS N/A 19.98 pg/L 99 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Lead {Pb) LCS N/A 21.46 pg/L 107 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Mercury. {Hg) LCS N/A 1.95 pg/L 97 2 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Nickel (NJ) LCS N/A 20.42 pg/L 102 20 ND 130 70 08/]4/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Tolal LCS N/A 19.65 pg/L 98 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Silver (Ag) LCS N/A 20.02 pg/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Thallium {TI) LCS N/A 21.25 pg/L 106 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Anlimony (Sb) LCSD N/A 19.37 pg/L 96 6.3 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) LCSD N/A 20.03 ~g/L 100 2.1 20 ND 130 70 08/14/0l Acceptable Beryllium(Be) LCSD N/A 18.80 gg/L 94 l.! 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Cadmium (Cd) LCSD N/A 20.29 ~g/L 101 2.1 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Clux)mium- Total (Ct) LCSD N/A 20.39 lag/L 101 I 20 ND 120 80 08/14/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) LCSD N/A 20.29 I~g/L 101 1.6 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) LCSD N/A 20.95 lag/L 104 2.4 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Mercury (Hg) LCSD N/A 2.02 iag/L 101 3.6 2 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Nickel (NJ) LCSD N/A 20.19 ~g/L 100 1.1 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Total LCSD N/A 18.58 I~g/L 92 5.6 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Silver {Ag) LCSD N/A 20.00 }~g/L 100 0.099 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Thallium (TI) LCSD N/A 20.38 gg,'L 101 4.1 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) MS 131920 21.40 sig/L 106 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) MS 131920 22.18 pg/L II0 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Beryllium(Be) MS 131920 19.63 gg/L 98 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Cadmium (Cd) M S 131920 19.90 pg/L 99 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (Ct) MS 131920 21.80 lug/L 104 20 1.0 120 80 08/14/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) MS 131920 28.90 pg/L 97 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 6 of 16 RPD: Relalive Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Resull Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit : LABORATORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Waler Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLi,ns Run #: 24728 IIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: ICPMSI Analyst Initials: PARMINDERS Method Number: PB MS TS Analyfe Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Malfix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc 'Conc UCL LCL Date Lead (Pb) MS 131920 20.57 pg/L 102 20 ND 130 70 08/14101 Acceptable Mercury (Hg) MS 131920 1.88 t~g/L 94 2 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Nickel (Ni) MS 131920 20.52 pg/L 102 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Tolal MS 131920 20.44 /ag/L 102 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) MS 131920 18.54 pg/L 92 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Thallium(TI) MS 131920 20.53 /ag/L 102 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) . MSD 131920 21.38 pg/L 106 0.093 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) MSD 131920 22.36 pg/L I I I 0.81 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Beryllium(Be) MSD 131920 20.46 pg/t, 102 4.1 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Cadmium(Cd) MSD 131920 19.73 pg/L 98 0.86 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Chromium ~ Tolal'(Cr) MSD 131920 21.15 pg/L 100 3 20 1.0 120 80 08/14/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) MSD 131920 28.69 p g/l.. 96 0.73 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) MSD 131920 21.30 /aWL 106 3.4 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Mercury(Hg) MSD . 131920 1.92 pg/L 96 2.1 2 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Nickel (NJ) MSD 131920 20.29 /ag/L 10l I.l 20 ND 1'30 70 08/14/0J . Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Tolal MSD 131920 20.83 pg/L 104 1.9 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) MSD 131920 18.97 pg/L 94 2.2 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Thallium (TI) MSD 131920 20.91 i~l g/L 104 1.9 20 ND 130 70 08/14/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L -~ 2 2 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L ~ 2 ' 2 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Beryllium (Be) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L ~: I I N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Cadmium (Cd) RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L ( ! I N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (CO RBLK N/A 0 pg/L ~ I I N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) RBLK N/A 0 ~glL ~ 5 5 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L '< 5 5 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Mercury (Hg) % RBLK N/A 0 pg/L e 0.4 0.4 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Nickel (Ni) RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 10 10 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Total RBLK N/A 0 lug/L ~ < 2 2 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Silver (Ag) RBLK N/A 0 I.~g/L < l0 10 N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable Thallium (Tl) RBLK N/A 0 l~tg/L < I I N/A 08/14/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24832 IIIIIIIIIIlllllllllllllmlllllllll Instrument ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Cone UCL LCL Date ! ,2-Dichlorobenzene LCS N/A 2.59 /aWL 86 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Benzene LCS N/A 2.64 pg/L 88 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample'used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 7 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL:. Lower Control Limit QC.Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Projecl ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK SlarLims Run #: 24832 IIIIIIIIlllllllllllllllllllllllllll ~ns,~ment ID: OC6 Analyst lnitials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyle Resulls Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Bromodichloromethane LCS N/A 2.32 pg/L 77 3.0 ND t20 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Bromoform LCS N/A 1.53 pg/L 51 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Chloroform LCS N/A 2.82 pg/L 94 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibromochlommethane [,CS N/A 2.38 p,g/L 79 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Methyl-t-Butyl Ether LCS N/A 2.85 pg/L 95 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Methylene chloride LCS N/A 3.12 pg/L 104 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Telmchloroethene (PCE) LCS N/A 2.64 gg/L 88 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Trichloroelhene (TCE) LCS N/A 2.7 pg/L 90 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable 1.2-Dichlorobenzene LCSD N/A 2.69 i~g/L 89 3.8 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Benzene LCSD N/A 2.64 pg/L 88 0.0 3.0 ND 120 80 08[17i01 Acceptable BromodichloroJnelhane LCSD N/A 2.48 pg/L 82 6.7 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromofonn LCSD N/A 1.76 [tg/L 58 13 3.0 N D 120 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Chloroform LCSD N/A 2.74 pg/L 91 2.9 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 7/01 Acceptable Dibromochloromethane LCSD N/A 2.63 ~g/L 87 I0 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Methyl-l-Bulyl Ether LCSD N/A 2.51 pg/L 83 12 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Tetrachloroethene (PCE) LCSD N/A 2.69 pg/L 89 1.9 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 ,4cceptable Trichloroelhene (TCE) LCSD N/A 2.82 pg/L 94 4,3 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 ,4cceptable I,l,l,2-Telrachlomethane RBLK N/A 0 i~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable l,l,l-Trichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 ~ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable ],l,2,2-Telrach}oroethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I,I,2-Tfichloro-l,2,2-Trifluomethan RBLK N/A 0 .ug/L < 10 10 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I,I,2-Trichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 [~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I,I-Dichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 t~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable l,l-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 i~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I,I-Dichloropmpene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable i,2,3-Trichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 !ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 I~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 ¢g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 ~4cceptable ! ,2-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 !u~L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichloroelhane RBLK N/A 0 .ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichloropropane . RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable ! ,4-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 [tg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/0 ! Acceptable 2,2-Dichloropmpane RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 2-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 [tg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 ,4cceptable 4-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matr;x for MS/MSD Page g of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK LABORATORIES' QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted · 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Rnn #: 24832 IIIIIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IFISIFUI~ent ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Malrix Analyte QCType SpikeID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Benzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromobenzene RBLK N/A 0 p g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 0WI 7/01 Acceptable Bromochloromethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromodichloromelhane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 03 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromoform RBLK N/A ,0 pg/L < 0,5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromomethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Carbon tetrachloridc RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chlorobcnzcne RBLK N/A 0 pg/L <0.5 0,5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chtoroethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chloroform RBLK N/A 0 I~WL < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chloromelhane RBLK N/A 0 l~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable cis-l,2-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable cis-t,3-DJchloropropene RBLK N]A 0 bsg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibromochloromethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable DJbromomelhane RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable DJchlorodJfluoromelhane RBLK N/A 0 ffg/L < 1 1 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Ethyl t-Butyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 pg/L ~ 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Elhylbenzeue RBLK N/A 0 llg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Ethylencdibromide RBLK N/A 0 rlg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable HexachlorobuladJcnc RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable lsopropylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable m,p-Xylenes RBLK N/A 0 [~g/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Methyl-t-Butyl Ether RBLI~ N/A 0 lag/L < 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 ,,fcceptable Methylene chloride RBLK N/A 0 ~ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable n-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable n-Propylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Naphthalene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable o-Xylene RBLK N/A 0 !ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 ,4cceptable p-lsopropyltoluene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable sec~Bulylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Styrene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable l-Amyl Methyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 I~EdL < 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable tert-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable Tetrachloroethene (PCE) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Toluene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Total 1,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L · < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Accept[~ble Tolal Trihalomethanes RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Tolal Xylene Isomers RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable trans-l,2-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 9 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OaS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit oaS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24832 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllllll ln::trumenl ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Dale trans-l,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 ~ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Trichloroethene(TCE) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Tfichloroflouromethane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 5 5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Vinyl chloride RBLK N/A 0 .ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Run Comments LCS/LCSD recoveries were out of range for Bromodichloromethane, Bromofi~rm, and Dibromochloromethane. Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Sun'. Result UCL LCL Date I-Chloro-2-11uorobenzene LCS N/A 97 % Rec 105 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable I-Chloro-2~fluorobenzene LCSD N/A 100 % Rcc 105 120 80 08117/01 Acceptable l-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene RBLK N/A 105 % Rcc 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable BSK SlarLims Run #: 24849 IIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: ]CPI Analyst lnitials: JOSHK Method Number: AL_ICP_TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Aluminum (Al) LCS N/A 1.11 mg/L 100 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Barium (Ba) LCS N/A I.l I mg/L 100 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Calcium (Ca) LCS N/A 53.9 mg/L 97 55.56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Iron {Fe) LCS N/A 1.09 mg/L 98 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Magnesium (Mg) LCS N/A 53.1 mg/L 95 55.56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Manganese (Mn) LCS N/A 0.54 mg/L 96 .56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Potassium (K) LCS N/A 29 mg/L 87 33.33 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Sodium (Na) LCS N/A 108 mg/L 97 1 i !.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) LCS N/A !.00 mg/L 90 !.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Aluminum (Al) LCSD N/A 1.12 mg/L 100 0.9 !.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Barium(Ba) LCSD N/A 1.21 mg/L 109 8.7 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Calcium (Ca) LCSD N/A 58.1 mg/L 104 7.6 55.56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable iron (Fe) LCSD N/A 1.16 mg/L 104 6.2 I.II ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Magnesium (Mg) LCSD N/A 57.3 mg/L 103 7.7 55.56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Manganese (Mn) LCSD N/A 0.58 mg/L 103 7.1 .56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Potassium (K) LCSD N/A 30.3 mg/L 90 4.3 33.33 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Sodium (Na) LCSD N/A 117 mgtL 105 8 I 1 I.I 1 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) LCSD N/A 1.08 mg/L 97 7.7 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Aluminum (Al) MS 131920 1.22 mg/L 109 !.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Barium (Ba) MS 131920 1.14 mg/L 97 1.11 0.060 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Calcium (Ca) MS 131920 97.4 mg/L 108 55.56 34 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Iron {Fe) MS 131920 1.31 mg/L 118 IAI ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matriX for MSLMSD Page I 0 of ! 6 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit ,,BSK ANA YT,C AL L A B O I'CA T O RI ES IIII QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission ' 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted ' 08/07/2001 Project 1D: Project Desc' Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24849 IIIIIIIIIIil11111111111111111111111 lnstrumenl ID: Analyst Initials: JOSHK Method Number: MG_ICP_TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units or RPD ILPD Cone Cone UCL LCL' Date Magnesium (Mg) MS 131920 69.0 mg/L 115 55.56 4.7 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Manganese {Mn) MS 131920 0.66 mg/L I 17 .56 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Potassium(K) MS 131920 38.3 mg/L 112 33.33 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Sodium (Ns) MS 131920 150 mg/L 114 I I I.I I 23 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) MS 131920 1.27 mg/L 114 I.II ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Aluminum(Al) MSD 131920 1.17 mg/L 105 4.1 131 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Barium {Ba) MSD 131920 1.13 mg/L 96 0.89 IAI 0.060 130 70 08/16/01 ,4cceptable Calcium(Ca) MSD 131920 96.5 mg/L 107 0.93 55.56 34 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Iron (Fe) MSD 131920 1.30 mg/L 117 0.77 1.11 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Magnesium{Mg) MSD 131920 68.9 mg/L 115 0.14 55.56 4.7 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Mangaaese {Mn) MSD 131920 0.65 mg/L 116 1.6 .56 ND 130 70 08/I 6/01 Acceptable Potassium{K) MSD 131920 37.9 mg/L III I 33.33 ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Sodium(Na) MSD 131920 151 mg/L 115 0.67 IIl.ll 23 130 70 08/16/01 Acceplable Zinc (Zn) MSD 131920 1.25 mg/E 112 1.6 I.II ND 130 70 08/16/01 Acceptable Aluminum (Al) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Barium (Ba) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 · 0.05 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Calcium {Ca) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 03 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Iron (Fe) RBLK N/A 0 mgtL < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Magnesium {Mg) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 0. I N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Manganese (Mn) RBLK N/A 0 mgtL < 0.01 0,0l N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Potassium(K) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Sodium (Na) RBLK N/A 0.003 mg/L < I I N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/16/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25018 IIIIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: SVGCMS1 Analyst Initials: DAVIDR Method Number: 548 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units orRPD RPD Conc Cone UCL LCL Date Endothall LCS N/A 77.3 p,g/L 77 100 ND 134 10 08/20/01 Acceptable Endothall LCSD N/A 70.7 }~g/L 70 9 100 ND 134 10 08/20/01 Acceptable Endothall MS 131297 67.5 pg~L 67 100 ND 134 I 0 08/20/01 Acceptable EndolhaJl RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 45 45 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Rnn #: 25254 IIIII]lllllllllllllllllll]llllllll Instrument 1D: HPLC2 Analyst Initials: TIMC Method Number: 632 %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page ! 1 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit QC Summary Repoi't 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Clienl: CMiforni~ Writer Service Co. Date Submilled: 08/07/2001 Project 1D: Project Desc · B~kersfieid BSK SlarLims Run g: 25254 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111 liniment ID: HPLC2 Analyst Initials: T~]C Method Number: 632 Analyle Resulls Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Ty~ SpikelD Result Units or RPD ~D Conc Conc UCL LCL Da~e Catba~l LCS N/A 47.7 pWL 99 48 ND 130 67 08/22/01 Acceptable Diuron LCS N/A 9.7 pffL 107 9 ND 151 75 08/2~01 Acceptable Fenuron LCS N/A 50.7 ~WL 84 60 ND 112 56 08/22/01~ Acceptable L~uron LCS N/A 6.3 pg/L 70 9 ND 105 53 08/22/01 Acceptable Carba~l LCSD N/A 47.2 ~WL 98 I 48 ND 130 67 08/2~01 Acceptable Diuron LCSD N/A 9.9 pWL 1 l0 2 9 ND 151 75 08/2~01 Acceptable F~uron LCSD N/A 50.7 ~L 84 0.0 60 ND 112 56 08/22/01 Acceptable Linuron LCSD N/A 6.3 ~ 70 0.0 9 ND 105 53 08/22/01 Acceptable Barb~ ........... RB~ N/A 0 t~L < 6 6 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Carba~l RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 6 6 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Carbo~mn RBLK N/A 0 [~g/L < 25 25 N/A 08122/01 Acceptable Chloropropham RBLK N/A 0 [~g/L < 7 7 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable DJuron RBLK N/A 0 pffL < I I N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Fenuron RBLK N/A 0 [~WL < 4 4 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Fluome~ron RBLK N/A 0 ~WL < 3 3 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Linuton RBLK H/A 0 ~L < I I H/A 08/22101 Acceptable Methomyl RBLK N/A 0 pffL < 7 7 N/A 08/2~01 Acceptable Monuron RBLK N/A 0 pffL < 3 3 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable .Neburon RBLK N/A 0 ~WL < 2 2 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Oxamyl RBLK N/A 0 BWL < 3 3 N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Propham RBLK N/A 0 [~ffL < 7 7 N/A 08/2~01 Acceptable Pro~xur RBLK N/A 0 pffL < 30 30 N/A 08/2~01 Acceptable Sidumn RBLK N/A 0 pWL < 3 3 N/A 08~2/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surf. Result UCL LCL Dale Benthiocarb LCS N/A 89.9 % Rec 93 130 70 08/22/01 Acceptable Benthiocarb LCSD N/A 107.0 % Eec 93 130 70 08/22101 Acceptable Benthiocarb .............. -~B--LY~ ............-'N/~'-'- 93 %-Rec 130 70 08/22/01 Acceptable BSK SlarLims Run #: 25326 IIIilllllllllllllllllll{l{lllll{lll lmtmmenl ID: GC9 Analyst Initials: SHAIllNY Method Number: 504 Analyte Resu Its Matrix % Rec gpike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Dibromochloropropane LCS N/A 0.2968 lug/L 118 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide LCS N/A 0.2831 pg/L 113 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Dibromochloropropane LCSD N/A 0.2885 ,ug/L 115 2.9 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide LCSD N/A 0.2899 la g/L I 15 2.3 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matt ix for MS/M SD Page 12 of 16 RPD: Relalive Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Conlrol Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit L AB O RT , T O Ri E S QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission' 2001080336 '..~: Client ' California Water Service Co, Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Analyst Initials: SIIAtlINY Method Number: 504 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Dibromochloropropane MS 131885 0.3118 pg/L 121 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide MS 131885 0.3163 pg/L 126 .25 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Dibromochloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/-L < 0.01 0.01 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable EthylenedJbromide RBLK N/A 0 .ag/L < 0.02 0.02 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable SUrrogate Results Analyte QCType Surf. Result UCL LCL Date Bromo£orm LCS N/A 116.6 % Rec I 16.2 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Bromofom~ LCSD N/A I 15.5 % Rec I 16.2 130 70 08/28/01 ~cceptable Bromoform ' MS 131885 121.4 %Rec 118.3 130 70 08128/01 Acceptable Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 5151 Analyte Results ' Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date 2,4,5-T LCS N/A 0.264 [~g/L 366 .072 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS~High 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) LCS N/A 0.055 /Jg/L 91 .06 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4-D LCS N/A 0.225 ggfL 71 .313 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Bentazon (Basagran) LCS N/A 0.335 iug/L 93 .36 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dalapon LCS N/A 1.137 pg/L 37 3.026 ND 140 60 08124/01 OOS-Low Dicamba (Banvel) LCS N/A 0.121 lsg/L 100 .12 ND 140 60 08124/01 Acceptable Dinoseb {DNBP) LCS N/A 0. i 25 gg/L 68 .I 82 ND i 40 60 08/24/0 ! Acceptable Pentachlorophenol (PCP) LCS N/A 0.02 ! pg/L 87 .024 ND 140 60 08/24/0 ! Acceptable Picloram LCS N/A 0.084 iJg/L 127 .066 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-T LCSD N/A 0.298 ~ag/L 413 12 .072 ND ' 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-High 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) LCSD N/A 0.048 pg/L 80 13 .06 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4-D LCSD N/A 0.168 I~g/L 53 29 .313 ND 140 60 08/24101 OOS-Low Bentazon (Basagran) LCSD N/A 0.297 Isg/L 82 12 .36 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dalapon LCSD N/A 1.251 [~g/L 41 9.6 3.026 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Dicamba (Banvel) LCSD N/A 0.096 lag/L 80 23 .12 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dinoseb (DNBP) LCSD N/A 0.095 l~g/L 52 27 .1820 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Pentachlorophenol (PCP) LCSD N/A 0.058 gg/L 241 93 .024 ND 140 60 08/24/0 ! OOS-High Picloram LCSD N/A 0.08 l&g/L 121 4.9 .066 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-T RBLK ----~N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.2 -- 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-TP {Silvex) RBLK N/A 0 i~g/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4-D RBLK N/A 0 [tg/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Benlazon (Basagran) RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 2 2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable %Rec: Perceni Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as ba~:kground matrix for MS/MSD Page 13 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference oas-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit oaS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit L AB ORATO RI ES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission' 2001080336 Client: California Waler Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25385 IIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: GC7 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 5151 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result UfiiLs orRPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Dalapon RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < t I N/A 0g/24/01 Acceptable Dicamba (Banvel) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.081 0.081 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Dinoseb (DNBP) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Pentachlorophenol (PCP) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Piclomm RBLK N/A 0 ~.tg/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Run Comments LCS/LCSD recoveries were out of range for 2,4,5-T, Dalapon, 2,4-D, Dinoseb, and Pentachlorophenol. Surrogate Results Analyle QCType Surf. Result UCL LCL Date DCPAA LCS N/A 100 % Rec 102 130 70 08/24/01 Acceptable DCPAA ' LCSD N/A 87 % Rec 102 130 70 08/24/01 Acceptable DCPAA RBLK N/A 102 % Rec 130 70 08/24/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25481 IIIIllllllllllllllllltlllllllllllll lr,stmment ID: SVGCMS2 Analyst Initials: DANB ~vlethodNumber: 525 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Alachlor (Alanex) LCS N/A 4.77 pg/L 95 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene LCS N/A 3.43 ,ug/L I 14 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipale LCS N/A 4.44 pg/L 88 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-elhylhexyl) phthalate LCS N/A 4.52 gg/L 90 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Butachlor LCS N/A 3.39 .ug/L 113 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Metolachlor LCS N/A 4.08 pg/L 81 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Molinale (Ordram) LCS N/A 4.99 lug/L 99 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Prometryn (Caparol) LCS N/A 4.81 lug/L 96 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Propachlor LCS N/A 5.12 gg/L 102 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bolero) LCS N/A 5.38 !ug/L 107 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Alachlor (Alanex) LCSD N/A 5.25 lag/L 105 9.6 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene LCSD N/A 3.47 lug/L 115 1.1 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipale LCSD N/A 4.4 pg/L 88 0.91 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-elhylhexyl) phthalate LCSD N/A 4.63 pg/L 92 2.4 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Butachlor LCSD N/A 3.53 pg/L 117 4 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Metolachlor LCSD N/A 4.44 [tg/L 88 8.4 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Molinate (Ordram) LCSD N/A 5.14 pg/L ' 102 3 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Prometryn (Caparol) LCSD N/A 4.81 ~tg/L 96 0.0 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Propachlor LCSD N/A 5.08 pg/L 101 0.79 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bolero) LCSD N/A 5.78 [tg/L 115 7.1 5 ND ! 30 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Alachlor (Alanex) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < I i N/A 08,r27/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sampleused as background matrix for MSfMSD Page 14 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BS'K L AB OR ' TORI ES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Sub~nission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D: Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run fit: 25481 IIIIIIIIIIIIII1~111111111111111111 Instrument ID: SVGCMS2 Analyst Initials: DANB Method Number: 525 'Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type SpikelD Result Units Or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Atrazine (AAtrex) RBLK N/A 0 ~sg/L < I I N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene RBLK N/A 0 9g/L < 0. I 0.1 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Bromacil (Hyvar) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < l0 l0 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Bulachlor RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.38 0.38 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Diazinon RBLK N/A 0 I-~g/L < 0.25 0.25 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Dimethoale (Cygon) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 10 I 0 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Melolachlor RBLK N/A 0 .ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Metribuzin RBLK N/A 0 .ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Molinale (Ordram) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 2 2 ' N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Promelryn (Caparol) RBLK N/A 0 ~tg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Propachlor RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Simazine (Princep) RBLK N/A 0 l~g/L < I I N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bolero) RBLK N/A 0 I~g/L < 1 1 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type StaT. Result UCL LCL Dale ! ,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzcne LCS N/A 109.4 %Rec I ! 0 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene LCSD N/A I I 1.3 %Rec I I 0 130 70 08/27/0 ! Acceptable 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene RBLK N/A 107 %Rec 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25544 IIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: HPLC1 Analyst Initials: TIMC Method Number: 531 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc ,UCL LCL Date 3-Hydroxycaff°°furan LCS N/A 44.9 pgtL 149 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High Aldicarb LCS N/A 30.1 ~g/L 100 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable AIdicarb Sulfone LCS N/A 45.5 lagtL 151 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High Aldicarb Sulfoxide LCS N/A 32.6 !Jg/L 108 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Carbaryl LCS N/A 30.5 .ag/L 101 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Carbofuran LCS N/A 34.0 [tg/L 113 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Methomyl LCS N/A 31.1 .ag/L 103 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Oxamyl LCS N/A 41.6 !ug/L 138 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High 3-Hydroxycarbofuran LCSD N/A 47.5 pgtL 158 5.7 30 ND 130 70 08/27/0 i OOS-High AIdicarb LCSD N/A 32.5 pg/L 108 7.7 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfone LCSD N/A 46.7 pg/L 155 2.7 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High Aldicarb Sulfoxide LCSD N/A 32.9 pg/L 109 0.92 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 15 of 16 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK , L A B ORATO RI ES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080336 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted ' 08/07/2001 Project 1D: Project Desc · Bakersfiehl BSK StarLims Run #: 25544 IIIIIIIlllllllllllllllllllllllllll Ins~rument ID: HPLCI Analyst Initials: TIMC M¢lhodNumber: 531 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Dale Carbaryl LCSD N/A 31.6 pg/L 105 3.6 30 ND 130 70 08/27101 Acceptable Carbofumn LCSD N/A 34.0 [tg/L 113 0,0 30 ND 130 70 08/27/011 Acceptable Methomyl LCSD N/A 32.3 ~g/L 107 3,8 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Oxamyl LCSD N/A 41.9 pg/L 139 0.72 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01. OOS-High 3-1 lydroxycarbofilran MS 131920 43.8 [~g/L 146 30 ND 130 70 08/27101 OOS-ttigh Aldicarb MS 131920 30.6 [~g/L 102 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfone MS 131920 45.4 pg/L 151 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High Aldicarb Sulfoxide MS 131920 32.8 [~g/L 109 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Carbaryl MS 131920 31.5 l~g/L 105 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Carbofuran MS 131920 33.8 pg/L 112 30 ND 130 70 08/2'//01 Acceptable Methomyl MS 131920 32.1 ~.t g/L 107 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Oxamyl MS 131920 41.0 pg/L 136 30 ND 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High 3-Hydroxycarbofurnn RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Aldicarb RBLK N/A 0 [~g/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfone RBLK N/A 0 I-~g/L < 4 4 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfoxide RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Carbaryl RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 5 5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable · Carbofuran RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 5 5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Methomyl RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 2 2 N/A 08/27101 Acceptable Oxamyl RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 20 20 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Run Comments LCS/LCSD/MS recoveries were out of range for 3-Hydroxycarbofuran, Aldic arb Sulfone, and Oxamyl. Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surf. Result UCL LCL Date BDMC LCS N/A 171.6 % Rec 97 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High BDMC LCSD N/A 145.4 % Rec 97 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High BDMC MS 131920 155 */oRec 84 130 70 08/27/01 OOS-High BDMC RBLK N/A 97 ¥o Rec 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background m:arJx for MSLMSD Page ] 6 of ! 6 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC ResultAbove UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit 2001080336 o8/o7/2OOl B S I( A N A L Y T I C A LI ChainAnalySes RequeSt of C tdv LABORATORIES BSKs.bmlsslon~ CA WATER SV TAt:Standard .... 87069 IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Requested Analyses 388, 800 87%8310 (559) FAX 485-6935 Iii ~;,~, :i~?~t Sampled Sampled Sample Description/Location \ d . Solid Gas Additional Services: Additional Services Authorized by: Type of Hazards Associated with Samples: Rush Priority: [ ] - 2 Day [ ] - 5 Day [ ] - QC Data package: Level I1, III or IV (ci~'cle one) ,,,, , t 1. l:ormal Chain of Custody by:~ re Print Name Company Date Time Received I Relinquished by: Notice: Pay ' are due in full hen invoiced. If not so pa d account balances are deemed delinquent. Delinquent balances are subject to monthly sen/ice/re-billing charges and interest cai- BSK^N^L 'c Cover Letter, Veronica Simion 09/04/2001! California Water Service Co. 1720 North First Street San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission Number: 2001080337 Dear Veronica Simion: BSK Analytical Laboratories adheres to a quality assurance plan that has been approved by the State of California Department of Health Services. Our Environmental L ~boratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) certification number is 1180. BSK Analytical Laboratories has prepared this certificate of anal ysis in response to your request for analytical services. All information was taken fi'om your Chain of Custody or related correspondence. BSK completedall sample handling and analytical procedures within the Laboratory's standard acceptability criteria with any exceptions noted below. If additional clarificati on o f any in formation is require d, please contact our Client Services Department at (800)877-8310 or (559)497-2888. Sincerely, BSK Analytical Laboratories Authorizing Signature(s) fuliane Adan'~;v/ t/ Ko Yang thia Organic Laboratory Supervisor Inorganic Laboratory Supervisor QA/QC Supervisor Addendum: Laboratory QC Report I of · 14i4 Stanislaus Street · Fresno, CA 93706-1623 o Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 · Fax 559-485-6935 I IIIIIIllllllllllBlllllllllllll BSK Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ' ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Report lssue Date: 09/04/2001 San JOSe, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131924 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 'Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Inorganics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Alkalinity (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B 96 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Aluminum (Al) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Antimony (Sb) EPA 200.8 ND [tg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Arsenic (As) EPA 200.8 ND [tg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Barium (Ba) EPA 200.7 0.060 mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Beryllium (Be) EPA 200.8 ND pg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B 96 mg/L I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Cadmium (Cd) EPA 200.8 ND tag/L I I 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Calcium (Ca) EPA 200.7 34 mg/L 0.1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Carbonate (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B ND mg/L 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Chloride (Cf) EPA 300.0 13 mg/L 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Chromium - Hexavalent (Ct+6) EPA 218.6 1.0 pg/L 08/07/2001 08/07/2001 Chromium - Total (Ct) EPA 200.8 1.0 pg/L 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Color (A.P.H.A) SM 2120 B ND units 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Conductivity - Specific (EC) SM 2510 B 280 ~tmho/cm 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Copper (Cu) EPA 200.8 ND pg/L 50 50 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Cyanide (CN) SM 4500-CN-F ND pg/L 20 20 ' 08/09/2001 08/09/2001 Fluoride EPA 300.0 0.10 mg/L 0.1 1 0.1 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Hardness (as CaCO3) 100 mg/L !.0 1 1.0 08/22/2001 08/22/2001 Hydroxide (as CaCO3) SM 2320 B ND mg/L I I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Iron fie) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.05 I 0.05 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Langeliex Index (Saturation Index) ND - 1 N/A 08/22/2001 08/22/2001 Lead (Pb) EPA 200.8 11 pg/L 5 1 5 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Magnesium (Mg) EPA 200.7 4.7 mg/L 0.1 I 0. I 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Manganese (Mn) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.01 I 0.01 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Mercury (Hg) EPA 200.8 ND gg/L 0.4 I 0.4 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Nickcl'(Ni) EPA 200.8 ND pg/L 10 I l0 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Nitrate (NO3) EPA 300.0 4.0 mgfL I 1 I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Nitrite (NO2-N) EPA 300.0 ND mg/L 0.05 1 0.05 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Odor SM 2150 B 1.0 TON I I I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 rog/L: Milligrams/Liter (/)pm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result pg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~~H~~ 1 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 LABORATORIES I' I II I II Veronica Simion, Certificate of Analysis California Water SerVice Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Report Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San J6se, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131924 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liqtiid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Inorganics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Perchlorate (CIO4) EPA 314.0 ND pg/L 4 4 08/09/2001 08/10/2001 pH EPA 9040 7.4 STD N/A 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Potassium (K) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Selenium (Se) - Total EPA 200.8 ND I~g/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Silver (Ag) EPA 200.8 ND gg/L 10 10 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Sodium (Na) EPA 200.7 23 mg/L I 1 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Sulfate (804) EPA 300.0 I9 mg/L 2 2 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Surfactants (MBAS) SM 5540-C ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Thallium (TI) EPA 200.8 ND ggtL I I 08/08/2001 08/21/2001 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) SM 2540-C 180 mg/L 5 5 08/14/2001 08/15/2001 Turbidity SM 2130 B ND NTU 0.1 0. I 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Zinc (Zn) EPA 200.7 ND mg/L 0.05 0.05 08/08/2001 08/20/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date l,l,l,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,1 ,l-Trichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ~ EPA 502.2 ND p.g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,1,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-Trifluoroethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 10.0 1.00 10.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 l,l,2-Trichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND Itg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 i,l-Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1 ,I-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/I 9/2001 08/19/2001 l,l-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2,4-Trichlorobcnzene EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2,4=Trimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND I~g//_, 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/200 ! 08/19/2001 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limil H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result I~g/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. ¢g/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report AUthentication Code: ~ll~N~ul~u~l~u~ll~l~~ll~ 2 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559497-2:t88. In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 Veronica Simon Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate/11180 1720 North First Street .ort lssue Date: 09/04/2001 San J6se, cA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131924 '1 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield 1 'Submission Comments: 'l Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 .i Sample Description: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 .' Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal},te Method Result' Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND ltg/L 0.5 !.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Benzene EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromobenzen¢ EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromodichloromethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromoform EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromomethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Chlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Chloroethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Chloroform EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 i.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Chloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/200 I cis-l,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Dibromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Dibromomethan¢ EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 502.2 ND tag/L 1.0 1.00 1.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Ethyl t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Ethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Ethylenedibromide EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Hexachlorobutadiene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 lsopropylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 m,p-Xylenes EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Methylene chloride EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result gg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comment~ lag/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Codei IlJllllllll~lll~ltllllll~llllll~lllllJIIIlllillllllll~llllllllllll~ll~ll~tlll 3 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 BSK ^ ^ LABORATORIES. I I I IIIIII I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California' Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Report Issue Dale: 09{04/2001 San J'0se, CA 951 12 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSKSample ID #: 131924 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments.' Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description:: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyle Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Methyl-t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Naphthalene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 n-Butylbenzene . EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 n-Propylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L [}.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 o-Xylene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 p-lsopropyltoluene EPA 502.2 ND !ttg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 sec-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Styrene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 t-Amyl Methyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 502.2 ND /~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Toluene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Total 1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Tr/halomethanes EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Xylene Isomers EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 trans-i,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND [ig/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Trichloroethene (TCE) EPA 502.2 ND pgtL 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Trichloroflouromethane EPA 502.2 ND I~g/L 5.0 1.00 5.0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Vinyl chloride EPA 502.2 ND pgtL 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Dibromochloropropane EPA 504.1 ND pg/L 0.01 1 0.01 08/22/2001 08/26/2001 Ethylenedibromide EPA 504.1 ND pg/L 0.02 I 0.02 08/22/2001 08/26/2001 Aldrin EPA 505 ND pgtL 0.075 I 0.075 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Chlordane EPA 505 ND pg/L 0. I I 0.1 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Chlorothalonil (Daconil,Bravo) EPA 505 ND gg/L 5.0 I 5 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Dieldrin EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.02 1 0.02 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Endrin EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.1 I 0.1 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Heptachlor EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.01 ! 0.01 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Heptachlor epoxide EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.01 I 0.01 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Hexachlorobenzene EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.50 I 0.5 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result gg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) ' PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments, pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~B~1~[~l~~ 4 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-28:38, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 BSK I I I I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street }~eport Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San J6se, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131924 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anal~,te Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Hexachlorocyclopentadiene EPA 505 ND pg/L i 1 08/08/200 ! 08/09/2001 Lindane EPA 505 ND lag/L 0.2 0.2 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Methoxychlor EPA 505 ND ttg/L 10 10 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 PCBs: Arochlor Screen EPA 505 ND pg/L 0.2 0.2 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Toxaphene EPA 505 ND pg/L 1.0 I 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 Trifluralin EPA 505 ND Itg/L 1.0 I 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 2,4,5-T EPA 515.1 ND ttg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) EPA 515.1 ND lag/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/2412001 2,4-D EPA 515.1 ND ~tg/L 0.1 0.1 08/21/2001 08/2412001 Bentazon (Basagran) EPA 515.1 ND - [tg/L 2.0 2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Dalapon EPA 515.1 ND gg/L 1.0 I 08/21/2001 08/24/200 I Dicamba (Banvel) EPA 515. I ND [tg/L 0.081 0.081 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Dinoseb (DNBP) EPA 515.1 ND pg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Pentachlorophenol (PCP) EPA 515.1 ND pg/L 0.2 0.2 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 Picloram EPA 515.1 ND lag/L 0.1 0.1 08/21/2001 08/2412001 Alachlor (Alanex) EPA 525 ND pg/L 1.0 I 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Atxazine (AAtrex) EPA 525 ND pg/L 1.0 I 08/21/2001 08/2712001 Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 525 ND pg/L 0. i 0.1 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate EPA 525 ND lag/L 3.0 3 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate EPA 525 ND pg/L 3.0 3 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Bromacil (Hyvar) EPA 525 ND lag/L I0 10 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Butachlor EPA 525 ND I~g/L 0.38 0.38 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Diazinon EPA 525 ND ~tg/L 0.25 0.25 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Dimethoate (Cygon) EPA 525 ND I~g/L 10 10 08/21/2001 08/2712001 Metolachlor EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.5 0.5 08/21/2001 08127/2001 Metribuzin EPA 525 ND [tg/L 0.5 1' 0.5 08121/2001 08/27/2001 Molinate (Ordram) EPA 525 ND l~g/L 2.0 I 2 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Prometryn (Caparol) EPA 525 ND [tg/L 2.0 i 2 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Propachlor EPA 525 ND pg/L 0.5 I 0.5 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 Simazine (Princep) EPA 525 N'D Ixg/L 1.0 I 1 08/21/2001 08127/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result gg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. Sec Cover Letter for comment~ gg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by Extemal laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 BSK II IIII I IIIII Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720'North First Street Repor~ Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131924 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comment s: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Meter Time Sampled: 0850 Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units i?QL Dilution DLR Date Date Thiobencarb (Bolero) EPA 525 ND ~g/L 1.0 1 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 3-Hydroxycarbofuran EPA 531 ND lag/L 3.0 3 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Aldicarb EPA 531 ND pg/L 3.0 3 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Aldicarb Sulfone EPA 531 ND [tg/L ~,.0 4 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Aldicarb Sulfoxide EPA 531 ND pg/L 3.0 3 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Carbaryl EPA 531 ND ~tg/L 5.0 5 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Carbofuran EPA 531 ND pg/L 5.0 5 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Methomyl EPA 531 ND [lg/L 2.0 2 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Oxamyl EPA 531 ND pg/L 20.0 20 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 Glyphosate EPA 547 ND pg/L 9.0 9 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Endothal! EPA 548 ND ~ug/L 45 45 08/13/2001 08/20/2001 Diquat EPA 549 ND p.g/L 4 4 08/09/2001 08/13/2001 Diuron EPA 632 ND I~g/L 1.0 1 08/12/2001 08/22/2001 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene EPA 502.2 100 % Rec 1.00 0 08/19/2001 08/19/2001 Bromoform EPA 504.1 144.0 % Rec i N/A 08/22/2001 08/26/2001 Tetrachloro-m-xylene EPA 505 100 % Rec 1 N/A 08/08/2001 08/09/2001 DCPAA EPA 515.1 99 % Rec 1 N/A 08/21/2001 08/24/2001 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene EPA 525 130 %Rec I N/A 08/21/2001 08/27/2001 BDMC EPA 531 94 % Rec I N/A 08/28/2001 08/28/2001 AMPA EPA 547 104.6 % Rec I N/A 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 Benthiocarb EPA 632 83 % Rec 1 N/A 08/12/2001 08/22/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limil Iq: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result ~g/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letler for comment~ Isg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: ~l~~l~~i~ 6 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2988, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 'BSK ^ ^ LABORATORIES IIII I Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate #1180 1720 North First Street Repo~ Issue Date: 09/04/2001 San J6se, CA 951 12 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131925 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Travel Blank (08/01/01) Time Sampled: Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date 1,1,1,2-Tctrachloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/I, 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 I ,l,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluor6ethane EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 10.0 1.00 10.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 l,l,2-Thchloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,1 -Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/I 7/2001 08/17/2001 1,1 -Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 I ,l-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,3-Trichloropropane EPA 502.2' ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0~5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/200 i 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/1712001 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/! 7/2001 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 1,4-Dichlorobenzcne EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 502.2 ND /tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 '08/17/2001 08/17/2001 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 B~nzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromochloromethan¢ EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromodichloromethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromoform EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Bromomethane EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chlorobenzene EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 rog/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) . DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result pg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) ': PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments. pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: IIIIIIllflllllllllllllllllllllll~llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 7 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 . AN A L'YTIC A L BSKLABORATORIES , Veronica Simion Certificate of Analysis California Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate,#1180 1720 North First Street ~eport Issue Date: 09i04/2001 San Jose, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample ID #: 131925 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: . Travel Blank (08/01/01) Time Sampled: Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/Q7/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Analyte Method Result Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date Chloroethane EPA 502.2 ND I.~g/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloroform EPA 502.2 ND gg/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Chloromethane EPA 502.2 0.63 gg/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/! 7/2001 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromochloromethane EPA 502.2 ND [ag/L D.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dibromomethane EPA 502.2 ND I. tg/L I).5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 1.0 1.00 1.0 08/17/2001 08/! 7/2001 Ethyl t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND I-tg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Ethylenedibromide EPA 502.2 ND I-tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Hexachlorobutadiene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 lsopropylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND p,g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 m,p-Xylenes EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Methylene chloride EPA 502.2 ND I. tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND lag/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Naphthalene EPA 502.2 ND ~g/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 i.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 n-Propylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 o-Xylene EPA 502.2 ND I. tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 p-lsopropyltoluene EPA 502.2 ND Ixg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 sec-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND Isg/L 0.5 !.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Styrene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 t-Amyl Methyl Ether EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 3.0 1.00 3.0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 502.2 ND [tg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Toluene EPA 502.2 ND pg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Total ! ,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND ~tg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Trihalomethanes EPA 50~.2 ND [lg/L 0.5 I 0.5 Total Xylene Isomers EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside ofhold time rog/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result · pg/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comment~ pg/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-28~8, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 A N A ~'Y T I C A L BSK ~ · L A B 0 RATO Rl E S Veronica Simon Certificate of Analysis California. Water Service Co. ELAP Certificate/11180 1'720 North First Street }~eportlss~e Date: 09/04/2001 San J6se, CA 95112 BSK Submission #: 2001080337 BSK Sample 1D #: 131925 Project ID: Project Desc: Bakersfield Submission Comments: Sample Type: Liquid Date Sampled: 08/07/2001 Sample Description: Travel Blank (08/01/01) Time Sampled: Sample Comments: Date Received: 08/07/2001 Organics Prep Analysis Anai},te Method Result 'Units PQL Dilution DLR Date Date trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 !.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 Trichloroethene (ICE) EPA 502.2 ND tag/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/1.7/2001 Trichloroflouromethane EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 5.0 1.00 5.0 08/17/2001 08/17/200 ! Vinyl chloride EPA 502.2 ND gg/L 0.5 1.00 0.5 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 .s_~r.r.~.~.t_.~_ .................................................................................................................................................................... 1-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene EPA 502.2 93 % Rec 1.00 0 08/17/2001 08/17/2001 mg/L: Milligrams/Liter (ppm) PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit H: Analyzed outside of hold time mg/Kg: Milligrams/Kilogram (ppm) DLR: Detection Limit for Reporting P: Preliminary result lag/L: Micrograms/Liter (ppb) : PQL x Dilution S: Suspect result. See Cover Letter for comments lag/Kg: Micrograms/Kilogram (ppb) ND: None Detected at DLR E: Analysis performed by External laboratory. %Rec: Percent Recovered (surrogates) See External Laboratory Report attachments. Report Authentication Code: IIIIIIIIIII~IlIIIIIII~IIIlIII~IIlIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIlUlIIIIIHIlUlIII 9 of 9 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Phone 559-497-2888, In CA 800-877-8310 Fax 559-485-6935 BSK ^ ' I I QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24400 IIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lmtmment ID: Analyst Initials: MARIAM Method Number: CR6_IC Analyte Results Matrix % Rec 3pike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Chromium - Hexavalent (C~6) LCS N/A 10.25 lag/L 102 10 ND 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable Chromium - Hexavalent (Ct+6) LCSD N/A 9.95 lsg/L 99 3 10 ND 127 79 08/07/01 ~fcceptable Chromium- Hexavalent (Cr¢6) MS 131920 21.1 pgtL 100 20 1.0 127 79 08/07101 Acceptable Chromium - Hexavalent (Ct+6) MSD 131920 20.56 pg/L 97 2.6 20 !.0 127 79 08/07/01 Acceptable Chromium - Hexavalent (C~6) RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < I I N/A 08/07/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24441 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlffilllllllll ln:;tmment ID: Analyst Initials: JIMR Method Number: ALK Analyte Resnlts Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Units orRPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Alkalinity (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 96 mg/L 0 96 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 402 mg/L 0 400 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Bicaflaonate (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 96 mg/L 0 96 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 402 mg/L 0 400 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Carbonate (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 ,4cceptable Conductivity - Specific (EC) LDUP 131924 281 pmho/c I 280 30 N/A 08/08/01 ,4cceptable LDUP 131947 1209pmho/c 0 1200 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Hydroxide (as CaCO3) LDUP 131924 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable LDUP 131947 0 mg/L N/A ND 30 N/A 08/08/01 ,4cceptable pH LDUP 13 ! 924 7.43 STD 0 7.4 30 N/A 08/08/0 ! Acceptable LDUP 131947 7.38 SID 0 7.4 30 N/A 08/08/01 ,4cceptable pH - DI Extract LDUP 131756 1 ! .47 St&Unit 0 1 ! .5 30 N/A 08/08/01 · ,4cceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24472 lllllllilffillll~lllllllllllll Instrument ID: ICl Analyst Initials: PARAMJITK Method Number: CL_IC Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Chloride (Cl) LCS N/A 10.1 mg/L 101 10 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride LCS N/A 0.72 mg/L 96 0.75 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate {NO3) LCS N/A 22.29 mg/L 100 22.14 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite (NO2-N) LCS N/A 0.5 mg/L ! 00 0.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) LCS N/A 38.35 mg/L 102 37.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (CI) LCSD N/A 9.82 mg/L 98 2.9 10 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride LCSD N/A 0.77 mg/L 102 6.8 0.75 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page I of 18 RPD: Relative Pement Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit TICAL BSK ^ A TORI. ES LABO ill III . _I]UlIll ...... L. I I. IIIIIl_ Al.. Il_ [lilt ........II QC Summary Report 09/05/200 l BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID.: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24472 IIIlllllllffillllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: ICl Analyst Initials: PARAMJITK Method Numbe~': NaA_lC Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Cone UCL LCL Date Nitrate {'NO3) LCSD N/A 21.99 m,g/L 99 1.3 22.14 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite {NO2-N) LCSD N/A 0.49 mg/L 98 2 0.5 ND ! 30 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) LCSD N/A 37.94 mg/L 101 I 37.5 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (CI) MS 131920 32.28 mg/L 99 20 12 130 70 08/08/01 ,4cceptable Fluoride MS 131920 !.7 mg/L 106 1.5 0.10 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate (NO3) MS 131920 49.64 mg/L 103 44.28 4.0 130 70 08/08/01 ,4cceptable Nitrite (NO2-N) MS 131920 0.92 mg/L 92 I ND ! 30 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate(SOul) MS 131920 96.12 mgtL 103 75 19 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride {C1) MSD 131920 32.44 mg/L 99 0.49 20 12 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride MSD ! 31920 1.7 Jng/L 106 0.0 1.5 0.10 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate(NaA) MSD 131920 49.84 mg/L 103 0.4 44.28 4.0 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite {NO2-N) MSD 131920 0.9 mg/L 90 2.1 I ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) MSD 131920. 96.32 mg/L 103 0.2 75 19 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Chloride (Ci) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 1 I N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Fluoride RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 0. I N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrate (NAA) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < I ! N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Nitrite {NO2-N) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Sulfate (SO4) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BSa: StarLims Ru. #: 24489 IIIIIIIIIIlllltlllllllllllllllllll Instrument'lD: Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Method Number: COLOR Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Color (A.P.H.A) LDUP 131920 0 units N/A ND N/A 08/08/0 i Acceptable Odor LDUP 131920 I ION 0 1.0 N/A 08/08/0 ! ,4cceptable Turbidity LDUP 131920 0 NTU N/A ND N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24490 IIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111 Instrument ID: Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Method Number: MBAS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Surfactants (MBAS) LCS N/A 1.03 mg/L 103 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 OOS-High Surfactants (MBAS) LCSD N/A 1.05 mg/L 105 2 i ND 102 _ 81 08/08/01 OOS-High Surfactants (MBAS) MS 131920 0.9825 mg/L 98 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 Acceptable Surfactants (MBAS) MSD 131920 !.0205 mg/L 102 3.8 I ND 102 81 08/08/01 Acceptable %Rec: Pement Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 2 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference oas-High: QC Result Above UCL ' UCL: Upper Control Limit oaS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK ^ ^ LABORATORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Sub~nission: 2001080337 Client: CalifOrnia Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID.: · Project Desc: Bakersfield BSKS/arLimsRu, #: 24490 IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII in:;trument ID: Analyst Initials: ROBERTC M,:thod Number: MBAS Analyle Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type SpikelD Result Units orRPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Surfactants (MBAS) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/08/01' Acceptable Run Comments The LCS and LCSD recoveries were slightly high, however associated sample ~ were ND. BSK StarLims Run #: 24505 IIIIIIIIIl~llllllllHIIIIIl~lllll ln.':trument ID: GC4 Analyst Initials: DANB M,~'thod Number: 505 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date AIdrin LCS N/A 0.218 lig/L 87 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorolhalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) LCS N/A 2.015 pg/L 99 2.018 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin LCS N/A 0.209 I-Jg/L 83 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin LCS N/A 0.214 pg/L 85 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor LCS N/A 0.218 pg/L 87 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor epoxide LCS N/A 0.211 pg/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08~09~0 ! Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene LCS N/A 0.818 pg/L 81 I ND 130 70 08109/01 Acceptable ltexachlorocyclopentadiene ' LCS N/A 1.416 pgtL 94 1.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane LCS N/A 0.209 gg/L 83 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor LCS N/A 0.216 pg/L 86 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Aldrin LCSD N/A 0.209 !ag/L 83 4.2 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorothalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) LCSD N/A 1.915 ~tg/L 76 5 2.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin LCSD N/A 0.198 ~g/L 79 5.4 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin LCSD N/A 0.194 gg/L 77 9.9 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor LCSD N/A 0.21 pg/L 84 3.8 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptaehlor epoxide LCSD N/A 0.2 gg/L 80 5.3 0.25 ND ! 30 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobenzene LCSD N/A 0.783 ~gfL 78 4.3 I ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hex achlorocy¢lopentadiene LCSD N/A i.406 pg/L 93 0.71 1.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane LCSD N/A 0.203 i~g/L 81 3 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor LCSD N/A 0.182 pg/L 72 17 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable AIdrin MS 130590 0.212 [tg/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorothalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) MS 130590 1.882 pg/L 75 2.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin MS. 130590 0.196 lig/L 78 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin MS 130590 0.197 pg/L 78 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor MS 130590 0.212 ~ag/L 84 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor epoxide MS 130590 0.198 pg/L 79 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobera:ene MS 130590 0.806 I~g/L 80 ! ND 130 70 08109101 Acceptable Hexachloroeyclopentadiene MS 130590 1.476 ~g/L 98 1.5 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane MS 130590 0.198 ~ag/L 79 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor MS 130590 0.189 pg/L 75 0.25 ND 130 70 08/09/01 .4cceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrx for MS/MSD Page 3 of i 8 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit L A B OK TO RI E S QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID': ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24505 Itllllllllllllllll[llllllllllllllll Instrument ID: GC4 Analyst Initials: DANB Method Number: 505 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date AIdrin RBLK N/A 0 jlg/L < 0.075 0.075 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlordane RBLK N/^ 0 jig/L < 0. l 0.1 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Chlorothalonil (DaconiI,Bravo) RBLK N/A 0 jig/L < 5 5 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Dieldrin RBLK N/A 0 jig/l, < 0.02 0.02 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Endrin RBLK N/A 0 jig/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08109/01 Acceptable Heptachlor RBLK N/A 0 ji~/L < 0.01 0.01 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Heptachlor epoxide RBLK N/A 0 Jig/L < 0.01 0.01 N/A 08/09/01 Acceplable Hexachlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/09/0 ! Acceptable Hexachlorocyclopentadiene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < I I N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Lindane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Methoxychlor ' RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < l0 10 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable PCBs: Arochlor Screen RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Toxaphene RBLK N/A 0 ~ug/L < I I N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Triflumlin RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < I ! N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surr. Result UCL LCL Date Tetrachloro-m-xylene LCS N/A 74.1 %Rec 77 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Tetrachloro-m-xylene LCSD N/A 68.5 % Rec 77 130 70 08/09/01 OOS-Low Tetrachloro-m-xylene MS 130590 75.9 % Rec 110 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable Tetrachloro-m-xylene RBLK N/A 76.7 % Rec 130 70 08/09/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run/ii: 24522 IIIIlllllllllllllltlllfillllllllll Instrument ID: Analyst Initials: MATTM Method Number: CN_ISE Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Cone UCL LCL Date Cyanide (CN) LCS N/A 0.2 Isg/L 100 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/01 Acceptable Cyanide (CN) LCSD N/A 0.21 Jig/L 104 4.9 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/01 Acceptable Cyanide(CN) MS 131920 0.37 Jig/L 185 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/01 OOS-High Cyanide (CN) MSD 131920 0.40 i~g/L 200 7.8 .2 ND 119 78 08/09/01 OOS-High C'~anid~"i~q)' RBLK N/A 0 !ag/L < 20 20 N/A 08/09/01 Acceptable Run Comments The MS and MSD recoveries were affected by the matrix. BSK StarLims Run #: 24571 Illllllflllllllllmllllllllllllll Instrument ID: .PLCI Analyst Initials: TIMe Method Number: 547 %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 4 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK ^ LABO :ATORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24571 Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lnslrument ID: HPLC1 Analyst Initials: TIMC Method Number: 547 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Glyphosate LCS N/A 178 }Jg/L 89 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate LCSD N/A 192 I~g/L 96 7.6 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate MS 131374 178.5 p.g/L 89 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate MSD 131374 194.7 tsg/L 97 8.7 200 ND 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable Glyphosate RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 9 -- -- 9 N/A 08/08/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surf. Resnlt UCL LCL Date AMPA LCS N/A 97 % Rec 95.8 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA LCSD N/A 98 % Rec 95.8 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA MS 131374 104.6 %Rec 102.1 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA MSD 131374 101.7 %Rec 102.1 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable AMPA RBLK N/A 95.8 % Rec 130 70 08/08/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24574 IIIIIIllll[llllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: ICl Analyst Initials: MARIANI M~:thod Number: CLO4_IC Analyte Results Matrix % Rec :;pike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Perchlorate (CIO4) LCS N/A 31.04 pg/L 103 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable Perchlomte (CIO4) LCSD N/A 31.48 lsg/L 104 1.4 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) MS 131073 32.9 ~g/L 109 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable MS 132215 30.56 ~tg/L 101 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) MSD 131073 30.32 p.g/L 101 8.1 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 Acceptable MSD 132215 29.94 !ag/L 99 2 30 ND 130 70 08/10/01 ,4cceptable Perchlorate (CIO4) RBLK N/A 0 iag/L < 4 4 N/A 08/10/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24696 Illl[{ll[llllllllllllllllllllllllll ln~,trument ID: HPLC2 Analyst Initials: TIMC Method Number: 549 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Diquat LCS N/A 7.8 pg/L 19 40 ND 137 I 08/13/01 Acceptable Diqual LCSD N/A 8.2 pg/L 20 5 40 ND 137 I 08/13/01 Acceptable Diquat MS 131297 5.8 pg/L 14 40 ND 137 I 08/13/01 Acceptable Diquat RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 4 4 N/A 08/I 3/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 5 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK LABOK TORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/200 l BSK Submission: 2001080337 Clienl: California Water Service Co, Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID-: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield ~SK 8tarLims R,,n #: 247~4 IIIIIllllll]lll}lllllllllllllllllll instrument ID: BALANCEI Analyst Initials: ROBERTC Method Number: TDS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) LDUP 131659 994 mg/L 4 1000 30 N/A 08/15/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 24832 Illlllllllllllllllllllmllllllllll Instrument ID: GC6 Analyst lnitials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date '1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCS N/A 2.59 pg/L 86 3.0 ND 120 80 08!17/01 Acceptable Benzene LCS N/A 2.64 lag/L 88 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromodichloromethane LCS N/A 2.32 tag/L 77 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 O0$-Low Bromoform LCS N/A 1.53 }~g/L 51 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Chloroform LCS N/A 2.82 pg/L 94 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibromochlorome~ane LCS N/A 2.38 gg/L 79 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 005-£ow Methyl-t-Butyl Ether LCS N/A 2.85 ~g/L 95 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17101 Acceptable Methylene chloride LCS N/A 3.12 p.g/L 104 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Tetrachloroethene (PCE) LCS N/A 2.64 !ug/L 88 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Trichloroethene (TCE) LCS N/A 2,7 ~ag/L 90 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 7/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCSD N/A 2.69 ~ug/L 89 3.8 3.0 ND 120 80 0gtl 7/01 Acceptable Benzene LCSD N/A 2.64 ~g/L 88 0.0 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromodichloromethane LCSD N/A 2.48 lag/L 82 6.7 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 ~tcceptable Bromoform LCSD N/A 1.76 ~ag/L 58 13 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 OOS-Low Chloroform LCSD N/A 2.74 Isg/L 91 2.9 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibromochloromethane LCSD N/A 2.63 Itg/L 87 10 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 ,~cceptable Methyl-t-Butyl Ether LCSD N/A 2.51 lug/L 83 12 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable Tetrachioroethene (PCE) LCSD N/A 2.69 Iag/L 89 ! .9 3.0 ND 120 80 08/17/01 ,4cceptable Trichloroethene (TCE) LCSD N/A 2.82 lag/L 94 4.3 3.0 ND . 120 80 08/17/01 ,4cceptab. le i,l,l,2-Tetrachloroethane RBLK N/A 0 .ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I ,I ,I -Trichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable I,I,2,2-Tetracbloroethane RBLK N/A 0 ts,g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1~l,2-Trichloro-i,2,2-TrifluoroethanRBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 10 10 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable l ,I,2-Trichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/! 7/0 i Acceptable ' l,I -Dichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable l,I-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable l,l-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L '< 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2,3-Trichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable 1,2,4~Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable .% Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 6 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK L A B ORATORIES I '~ I II QC Summary Report 09/05/200 ! BSK Submission: 200108033'/ Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24832 IIIIIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec ,~:pike Spk Matrix Analyte QClype SpikelD Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17101 Acceptable 1,2-Dichlombenzene RBLK N/A 0 ggtL <0.5 0.5 bl/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichlomcthane RBLK N/A 0 lag~L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3,5-Trimethy!benzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 lq/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dichlompropane RBLK N/A 0 lag'lc < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 1,4-Diehlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 2,2-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable 2-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17101 Acceptable 4-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Benzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromobenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromochloromethane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromodichlommethane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromoform RBLK, N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Bromomethane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Carbon tetrachloride RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chloroethane RBLK N/A 0 lag/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chloroform RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5, N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Chloromethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable cis-!,2-Dichlomethene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable cis-l,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibmmochlommethane RBLK N/A 0 lagtL < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Dibromomethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Dichlorodifluoromethane RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < I I N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Ethyl t-Butyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Ethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 iag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide RBLK N/A 0 p,g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/! 7/01 Acceptable Hexachlorobutadiene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable lsopropylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable m,p-Xylenes RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Methyl-t-Butyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Methylene chloride RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/i 7/01 Acceptable n-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable n-Propylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable Naphthalene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable o-Xylene RBLK N/A 0 !ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background maMx for MS/MSD Page 7 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK LABORATORIES III I QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D': ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24832 IIIl[llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Instrument ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date p-lsopropyitoluene RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable sec-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Styrene RBLK ' N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable t-Amyl Methyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 3 3 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable lert-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Tetrachlomethene (PCE) RBLK N/A 0 tag/i.. < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Toluene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Total 1,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Total Trihalomethanes RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Tolal Xylene Isomers RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 7/01 Acceptable trans-l,2-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable tmns-l,3-Dichloropmpene RBLK N/A 0 lug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Trichloroethene (ICE) RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Trichloroflouromethane RBLK N/A 0 !ug/L < 5 5 N/A 08/17/01 Acceptable Vinyl chloride RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A' 08/17/0 ! Acceptable Run Comments LCS/LCSD recoveries were out of range for Bromodichloromethane, Bromofonn, and Dibromochloromethane. Surrogate. Results Analyte QC Type Sum Result UCL LCL Date l-Chlom-2-fluombenzene ' LCS N/A 97 % Rec 105 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable l--Chloro-2-fluorobenzene LCSD N/A 100 % Rec 105 120 · 80 08/17/01 Acceptable l-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene RBLK N/A 105 % Rec 120 80 08/17/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 2492S IllllllUlffilllllllfllllllllll Instrument ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date 1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCS N/A 2.54 tag/L 84 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Benzene LCS N/A 2.5 /ag/L 83 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Bromodichloromethane LCS N/A 2.72 gg/L 90 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 9/01 Acceptable Bromoform LCS N/A 2.52 Iag/L 84 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Chloroform LCS N/A 2.75 /ag/L 91 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Dibromochloromethane LCS N/A 3.15 /ag/L 105 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Methyl-t-Butyl Ether LCS N/A 2.46 lag/L 82 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Methylene chloride LCS N/A 2.72 /ag/L 90 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Tetrachloroethene (PCE) LCS N/A 2.59 /ag/L 86 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Trichlomethene (ICE) LCS N/A 2.64 pg/L 88 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichlorobenzene LCSD N/A 2.57 /ag/L 85 1.1 3.0 ND 120 80 08/! 9/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 8 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit LABORATORIES i i QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24925 IIIlllllllllllllllllllllll[llllllll lnst?ument ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QCType SpikelD Resull Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Benzene LCSD N/A 2.51 pg/L 83 0.39 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Bromodichloromelhane LCSD N/A 2.75 pg/L 91 I 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 9/01 ,4cceptable Bromoform LCSD N/A 2.39 isg/L 79 5.2 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 OOS-Low Chloroform LCSD N/A 2.73 I~g/L 91 3.73 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable Dibromochioromethane LCSD N/A 2.82 I~g/L 94 1 ! 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 9/01 ,~cceptable Methyl-I-Butyl Ether LCSD N/A 2.79 /ag/L 93 12 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Methylene chloride LCSD N/A 2.82 gg/L 94 3.7 3.0 ND 120 80 08/I 9/01 Acceptable Tetrachlomethene (PCE) LCSD N/A 2.66 pg/L 88 2.7 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Trichloroethene (TCE) LCSD N/A 2.67 pg/L 89 I. I 3.0 ND 120 80 08/19/01 Acceptable I,l,l,2-Tetrac. hloroethane RBLK N/A 0 pg]L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable I,l,I-Trichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 Isg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable I,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane RBLK N/A 0 /~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 9/01 .4cceptable l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-TrifluoroelhanRBLK N/A 0 ~g,/L < 10 10 N/A 08/19/01 ,qcceptable 1 ,! ,2-Trichloroethane - RBLK N/A 0 ,ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/! 9/01 ~lcceptable l,! -Dichloroethane RBLK N/A 0 ttg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/0 ! ,4cceplable l,l-Dichloroethene RBLK N/A 0 .ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable ! ,I -Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable i,2,3-Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable 1,2,3-Trichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceplable 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pgtL < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable i,2-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 lug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable 1,2-Dichioroethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable ! ,2-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,~cceptable 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,qcceptable 1,3-Dichiorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 Isg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable 1,3-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 9/01 ,4cceptable 1,4-Dichlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable 2,2-Dichloropropane RBLK N/A 0 [tg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,~cceptable 2-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/i 9/01 Acceptable 4-Chlorotoluene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Benzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Bromobenzene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,~cceptable Bromochloromethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ~4cceptable Bromodichloromethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Bromoform RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,~cceptable Bromomethane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Carbon tetmchloride RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cceptable Chlorobenzene RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/! 9/01 ,4cceptable %Rec: Percenl Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 9 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low:. QC Result Below LCL LCL: LoWer Control Limit L A B O' I A TO RI E S QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/0712001 Project ID-: · Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24925 IIIIJllllllllllllJlllllllll~lllll Z,s,~ment ID: GC6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 502 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Chiomethane ' RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Chloroform RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Chlommethane RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable cis-l,2-Dichlomethene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable ¢is-l,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Dibromochloromethan¢ RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Dibromomethane RBLK N/A 0 tag/I, < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Dichlorodifluoromethane RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < I i N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Ethyl t-Butyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Ethylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable }texachlorobutadiene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable }sopropylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable m,p-Xylenes RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Methyl-t-Butyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 3 3 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Methylene chloride RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable n-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable n-Propylb~nzene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 ' N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Naphthalene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable o-Xylene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable P-lsopropyitoluene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acc{ otable sec-Butyibenzene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Ac.c~ otable Styrene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acc~ ~table t-Amyl Methyl Ether RBLK N/A 0 Iag/L < 3 3 N/A 08/19/01 ,ffcce ~table tert-Butylbenzene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4ccc otable Telrachloroelhene (PCE) RBLK N/A 0 !ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08119/01 dcce otable Toluene RBLK N/A 0 $tg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4cee ~table Total },3-Dichloropropen¢ RBLK N/A 0 Isg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acce 9table Total Trihalomethanes RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acce ~table Total Xylene Isomers RBLK N/A 0 !ug/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4ccc 9table trans-l,2-Dicbloroetbene RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/I 9/01 Acce ~table trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene RBLK N/A 0 gg/L <0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 Acceptable Trichloroethene (TCE) RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A .08/19/01 ,4ccc ~table Trichloroflouromethane RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 5 5 N/A 08/19/01 ,4ccc ~table Vinyl chloride RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/19/01 dcce ~table Run Comments The LCSD recovery for Bromoform was 1% low. %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page i 0 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK LABO TORIES' J III I '1 I QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 200105033? Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/:2001 Project ID-: - Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 24925 Illlllllll~lllllllllllllllllllllll Instr~Jment ID: GE6 Analyst Initials: DAVET Met[,od Number: 502 Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surf. Result UCL LCL Date i-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene LCS N/A 94 % Rec 104 120 80 08/19/01 , ~4cceptable i -Chloro-2-fluorobenzene LCSD N/A 101 % Rec 104 120 80 08/I 9/0 i .4cceptable I-Chloro-2-fluorobenzene RBLK N/A 104 % Rec 120 80 08/! 9/01 ,4cceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25010 IllllllHllllll~lllllllllllil[llll lnstrJment ID: ICPI Analyst lnitfals: JOSHK Method Number: AL 1CP TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Sl:.ike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Aluminum(Al) LCS N/A 1.09 mg/L 98 1.11 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Barium (Ba) LCS N/A 1.08 mg/L 97 I.l I ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Calcium (Ca) LCS N/A 57.3 mg/L 103 55.56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable lron (Fe) LCS N/A 1.09 mg/L 98 1.11 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Magnesium (Mg) LCS N/A 55.4 mg/L 99 55.56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Manganese (Mn) LCS N/A 0.55 mg/L 98 .56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Potassium(K) LCS N/A 31.1 mg/L 93 33.33 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,,lcceptable Sodium (Na) LCS N/A 1 l0 mg/L 99 I ! 1. ! 1 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Zinc (Zn) LCS N/A 1.05 mg/L 94 l.l I ND 130 70 08/20/01 .4cceptable AImninum (Al) LCSD N/A !. 11 mg/L 100 1.9 l.l 1 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Barimn (Ba) LCSD N/A 1.10 mg/L 99 1.9 l.I 1 ND 130 70 08/20/01 .4cceptable Calcium (Ca) LCSD N/A 58.9 mg/L 106 2.8 55.56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Iron (Fe) LCSD N/A ! .1 I mg/L 99 i .9 1.1 i ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Magnesium (Mg) LCSD N/A 56.8 mg/L 102 2.4 55.56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Manganese(Mn) LCSD N/A 0.56 mg/L 100 1.9 .56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Potassium (K) LCSD N/A 32.0 mg/L 96 2.9 33.33 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ~4cceptable Sodium(Ha) LCSD N/A 113 mg/L 101 2.7 111.11 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Zinc (Zn) LCSD N/A !.08 mg/L 97 2.9 1.11 ND 130 70 08/20101 ,4cceptable Aluminum(Al) MS 131924 1.20 mg/L 108 I.I1 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Barium (Ba) MS 131924 1.25 mg/L 108 1.11 0.060 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Calcium (Ca) MS 131924 96.5 mg/L 107 55.56 34 130 70 08/20/0 ! ,4cceptable Iron (Fe) MS 131924 1.21 mg/L 109 l.il ND 130 70 08/20/01 .4cceptable Magnesium (Mg) MS 131924 67.0 mg/L 112 55.56 4.7 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable ManganeSe (Mn) M S 131924 0.61 mg/L 108 .56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Potassium (K) MS 131924 38.2 mg/L I I I 33.33 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Sodium (Na) MS 131924 146 mg/L Il0 lli.ll 23 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Zin~: (Zn) MS 131924 1.19 mgtL 107 !.11 ND 130 70 08/20/01 Acceptable Aluminum(Al) MSD 131924 1.31 mg/L 118 8.8 l.ll ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Barium (Ba) MSD 131924 i .35 mg/L 117 7.7 1.1 ! 0.060 130 70 08/20/0 ! ,4cceptable Calcium(Ca) MSD 131924 101 mg/L 112 4.6 55.56 34 130 70 08/20/01 .4cceptable lron (Fe) MSD 131924 1.32 mg/L 118 8.7 l.ll ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page l I of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above [JCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit · 'BSK ANA YTICAL L AB O I ATO RI E S QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID,: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25010 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Instrument ID: ICPI Analyst Initials:. JOSHK Method Number: MG_ICP_TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Magnesium (Mg) MSD 131924 72.3 mg/L 121 7.7 55.56 4.7 130 70 08/20/01 Acceptable Manganese(Mn) MSD 131924 0.66 mg/L Ii7 7.9 .56 ND 130 70 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Potassium (K) MSD 131924 41 mg/L 120 7 33.33 ND 130 70 08/20/01 Acceptable Sodium (Na) MSD 131924 157 mg/L 120 7.2 i I I.! I 23 130 70 08/20/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) MSD 131924 1.29 mg/L 116 8 1.11 ND 130 70 08/20101 Acceptable Aluminum (Al) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/20101 Acceptable Barium (Ba) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L , < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable C;ilcium (Ca) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 0,1 N/A 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Iron (Fe) RBLK N/A 0.002 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/20/01 ,4cceptable Magnesium (Mg) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable Manganese (Mn) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L <0.01 0.01 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable Potassium (K) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable Sodium (Na) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < I I N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable Zinc (Zn) RBLK N/A 0 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 N/A 08/20/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25019 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Instrument ID: SVGCMSI Analyst Initials: DAVIDR Method Number: 548 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Endothall LCS N/A 87.7 lag/L 87 100 ND 134 10 08/20/01 ~4cceptable Endolhail LCSD N/A 78.9 Isg/L 78 10 100 ND 134 10 08/20/01 Acceptable Endothaii MS 132309 58.9 I~g/L 58 100 ND 134 10 08/20/01 Acceptable Endothall RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 45 45 N/A 08/20/01 ,4cceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25084 IIIIlllllllllllllllllllllflllllllll Instrument ]D: ]CPMS1 Analyst Initials: PARMINDERS Method Number: SB MS TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte' QC Type SpikelD Result Units orRPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Antimony (Sb) LCS N/A 19 ~Lg/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) LCS N/A 19 pg/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Beryllium(Be) LCS N/A 18 gg/L 90 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 ,dcceptable Cadmium (Cd) LCS N/A 19 pg/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (CO LCS N/A 20 Isg/L 100 20 ND 120 80 08/21/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) LCS N/A 20 gg/L i00. 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) LCS N/A 21 I~g/L 105 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 ,4cceptable %Rec: Pement Recovered Parent sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page i 2 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK III I QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitled: 08/07/2001 Project ID.: ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25084 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII]11111111 lnstrament ID: ICPMSI Analyst Initials: PARMINDERS Metltod Number: HG MS TS Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD l~PD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Mercury (Hg) LCS N/A i .9 pg/L 95 2 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Nickel (NJ) LCS N/A 20 lug/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se)-Total LCS N/A 19 !ag/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) LCS N/A 20 gg/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Thallium (TI) LCS N/A 20 pg/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) LCSD N/A ! 9 I~g/L 95 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) LCSD N/A 19 gg/L 95 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Beryllium (Be) LCSD N/A 19 pg/L 95 5.4 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Cadmium (Cd) LCSD N/A 19,8 lag/L 99 4,1 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (Ct) LCSD N/A 20 lug/L 100 0,0 20 ND 120 80 08/21/01 Acceptable Copper {Cu) LCSD N/A 20 [tg/L 100 0~0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) LCSD N/A 21 1~g/L 105 0,0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Mercury (Hg) LCSD N/A 2.2 lug/L 110 14 2 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Nickel {NJ) LCSD N/A 20 [tg/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se)-Total LCSD N/A 20 lag/L 100 5.1 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) LCSD N/A 20 ~tg/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 ,4cceptable Thallium (TI) LCSD N/A 20 I~g/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) MS 131924 20 I~g/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) MS 131924 21 [~g/L 105 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Beryllium (Be) MS 131924 19 I~g/L 95 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Cadmium(Cd) MS 131924 20 lag/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Chromium-Total(CO MS 131924 21 ~g/L 100 20 1.0 120 80 08/21/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) MS 131924 39 gg/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) MS 131924 31 iag/L 100 20 Il 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Mercury (Hg) MS 131924 1.8 i~g/L 90 2 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Nickel (NJ) MS 131924 20 I~g/L 100 20 ND 130 '/0 08/21/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) -Total MS 131924 21 ~tg/L 105 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) MS 131924 20 ~tg/L 105 19 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Thallium (TI) MS 131924 20 [sg/L 100 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb) MSD 131924 20 gg/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) MSD 131924 22 gg/L 110 4.7 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Beryllium(Be) MSD 131924 20 ~ag/L 100 5.1 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Cadmium(Cd) MSD 131924 20 ~g/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (Ct) MSD 131924 21 [sg/L 100 0.0 20 1,0 120 80 08/2 i l01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) MSD 131924 39 gg/L 100 0.0 20 ND 1.30 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Lead (Pb) MSD 131924 31 I~g/L 100 0.0 20 Il 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Mercury (Bg) MSD 131924 2.1 I~g/L 105 15 2 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Nickel (Ni) MSD 131924 20 ~tg/L 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Total MSD 131924 21 Isg/L 105 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 13 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit LABO TORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submilted: · 08/07/2001 Project ID ;- · Project Desc' Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25084 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Instrument ID: ICPMSl Analyst Initials: PARMINDERS Method Number: AG MS TS · Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Silver(Ag) MSD 131924 19 pg/L 95 5.1 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Thallium (TI) MSD 131924 20 pg/L, 100 0.0 20 ND 130 70 08/21/01 Acceptable Antimony (Sb} RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 2 2 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Arsenic (As) RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 2 2 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Beryllium (Be) RBLK N/A 0 !ag/L < I I N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Cadmium (Cd) RBLK N/A 0 !ag/L < I I N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Chromium - Total (Ct) RBLK N/A 0 ~ag/L < I I N/A 08/2 i/01 Acceptable Copper (Cu) RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 5 5 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptab/e Lead (Pb) RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 5 5 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Mercury(Hg) RBLK N/A 0 Hg/L < 0.4 0.4 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Nickel(NJ) RBLK N/A 0 I~g/L < 10 10 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Selenium (Se) - Total RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 2 2 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Silver(Ag) RBLK N/A 0 l~g/L < 10 10 N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable Thallium(TI) RBLK N/A 0 i. tg/L < I . I N/A 08/21/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25246 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Instrument ID: GC9 Analyst Initials: 'SItAItlNY Method Number: 504 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Dibmmochloropropane LCS N/A 0.2956 pg/L 118 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide LCS N/A 0.2908 lag/L 116 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Dibmmochlompmpane LCSD N/A 0.2884 pg/L 115 2.4 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide LCSD N/A 0.2835 gg/L !!3 2.6 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Dibmmochlompmpane MS 132778 0.2764 gg/L 105 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Elhylenedibromide MS 132778 0.2809 pg/L !!2 .25 ND 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Dibmmochloropropane RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.01 .0.01 N/A 08/26/01 Acceptable Ethylenedibromide . RBLK N/A 0 IxgtL < 0.02 0.02 N/A 08/26/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Sum Result UCL LCL Date Bromofonn LCS N/A 123.8 % Rec 120.7 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Bromoform LCSD N/A 118.4 % Rec 120.7 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Bromoform MS 132778 126.1 %Rec 126.8 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable Bromoform RBLK N/A 120.7 % Rec 130 70 08/26/01 Acceptable %Rec: Pement Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 14 of ! 8 PO>D: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: CalifOi'nia Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project 1D.: - Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25255 IIIIIllllllllllllllll[lllllllllllll lnstn~ment ID: HPLC2 Analyst initials: TIMC Method Number: DIURON Analyte Results Matrix . % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD R'?D Conc Conc UCL LCL Date Diuron LCS N/A 10.9 pg/L 121 ' 9' ND 151 75 08/22/01 Acceptable Diuron LCSD N/A 9.9 pg/L I i0 9.7 9 ND 151 75 08/22/01 Acceptable Diuron RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < i ! N/A 08/22/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surf. Result UCL LCL Date Benthiocarb LCS N/A 104.7 % Rec 87 130 70 08/22/01 Acceptable Benthiocarb LCSD N/A 88.8 % Rec 87 130 70 08/22/01 Acceptable Benthiocarb RBLK N/A 87 % Rec 130 70 08/22/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25385 IlllllllllllIallllllllllllllllllll lnsuument ID: GE7 Analyst Initials: DAVET Method Number: 5151 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD 1;.PD Conc Conc UCL LCL Date 2,4,5-T LCS N/A 0.264 lag/L 366 .072 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-ttigh 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) LCS N/A 0.055 ~tg/L 91 .06 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4-D LCS N/A 0.225 pg/L 71 .313 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Bentazon (Basagran) LCS N/A 0.335 pg/L 93 .36 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dalapon LCS N/A 1.137 pg/L 37 3.026 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Dicamba (Banvel) LCS N/A 0.121 pg/L 100 .12 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dinoseb (DNBP) LCS N/A 0. i 25 pg/L 68 .182 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Pentachlomphenol (PCP) LCS N/A 0.021 ~g/L 87 .024 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Picloram LCS N/A 0.084 pg/L 127 .066 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-T LCSD N/A 0.298 I~g/L 413 12 .072 ND i 40 60 08/24/01 OOS-High 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) LCSD N/A 0.048 lag/L 80 13 .06 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4-D LCSD N/A 0.168 pgJL 53 29 .313 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Bentazon (Basagran) LCSD N/A 0.297 l~g/L 82 12 .36 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dalapon LCSD N/A 1.25 ! pg/L 41 9.6 3.026 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Dicamba (Banvel) LCSD N/A 0.096 pg/L 80 23 .12 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable Dinoseb (DNBP) LCSD N/A 0.095 pg/L 52 27 .1820 ND 140 60 08/24/01 OOS-Low Pentachlorophenol (PCP) LCSD N/A 0.058 pg/L 241 93 .024 ND 140 60 08/24/01 O0$-High Picloram LCSD N/A 0.08 pg/L 121 4.9 .066 ND 140 60 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-T RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) RBLK N/A 0 t~g/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 .qcceptable 2,4-D RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.1 0. I N/A 08/24/0 ! Acceptable Bentazon (Basagran) RBLK N/A 0 I~g/L < 2 2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Dalapon RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < I I N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Dicamba (Banvel) RBLK N/A 0 tag/L < 0.081 0.081 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 15 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK A N A L_YT I C AL LABOi TORIES QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID.:. ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25385 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllllll~lllll Instrument ID: GC7 AnalyslInitials: DAVET Method Number: 5151 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Dinoseb (DNBP) RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 dcceplable Pentachlorophenoi (PCP) RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 0.2 0.2 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Picloram RBLK N/A 0 I~g/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/24/01 Acceptable Run Comments LCS/LCSD recoveries were out 0frange for 2,4,5-T, Dalapon, 2,4-D, Dinoseb, and Pentachlorophenol. Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Sum Resull UCL LCL Date DCPAA LCS N/A 100 % Rcc 102 130 70 08/24/01 Acceptable DCPAA LCSD N/A 87 % Rec 102 130 ' 70 08/24/01 /Icceptable DCPAA '- RB----Lfi- ......... -N/A .... i~2 '"-o~Re~ ........................ i~3 ..... 50 -~'?~'4/0-1-'"-A-~"~$~ta~l~ BSK StarLims Run #: 25481 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllllllllll Instrument lD: SVGCMS2 Analyst Initials: DANB Method Number: 525 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Cone Cone UCL LCL Date Alachlor (Alanex) LCS N/A 4.77 gg/L 95 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene LCS N/A 3.43 pg/L 114 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate LCS N/A 4.44 tag/L 88 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyi) phthalate LCS N/A 4.52 gg/L 90 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Butachlor LCS N/A 339 Isg/L I 13 3. ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Metolachlor LCS N/A 4.08 tag/L 81 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable MolJnalc (Ordram) LCS N/A 4.99 gg/L 99 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptt~ble PromeL,-yn (Caparol) LCS N/A 4.8 i pg/L 96 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Propachlor LCS N/A 5.12 gg/L 102 5 ND ]30 70 08/27/0] Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bolero) LCS N/A 5.38 pg/L 107 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Alachlor (Alanex) LCSD N/A 5.25 pg/L 105 9.6 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene LCSD N/A 3.47 gg/L 1 ! 5 l.i 3 ND 130 70 0'8/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate LCSD N/A 4.4 pg/L 88 0.91 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate LCSD N/A 4.63 pg/L 92 2.4 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Butachlor LCSD N/A 3.53 pg/L 117 4 3 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Metolachlor LCSD N/A 4.44 tag/L 88 8.4 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Molinate (Ordram) LCSD N/A 5.14 pg/L 102 3 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Prometryn (Caparol) LCSD N/A 4.81 ~ag/L 96 0.0 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable. Propachlor LCSD N/A 5.08 pg/L 101 0.79 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bo]ero) LCSD N/A 5.78 gg/L 115 7. l 5 ND 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable Alachlor (Alanex) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < i I N/A 08/27/01 ,4cceptable Atrazine (,aAIrex) RBLK N/A 0 gg/L < I I N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Benzo(a)pyrene RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.1 0.1 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 16 of ! 8 . RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit BSK LABORATOR QC Summary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/07/2001 Project ID :- ' Project Desc: Bakersfield BSK StarLims Run #: 25481 Iillllllllllllllllllllll[llllllllll Instrument ID: SVGCMS2 Analyst InitialS: DANB Meth~dNumber: 525 Analyte Results Matrix, % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike 1D Result Units or RPD RI:D Cone Cone UCL LCL Date bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Bromacil (Hyvar) RBLK N/A 0 pgtL < 10 10 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Butachlor RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.38 0.38 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Diazinon RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.25 0.25 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Dimethoate (Cygon) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < l 0 l0 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Metolachlor RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Metribuzin RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Molinate {Ordram) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Prometryn (Caparol) RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 2 2 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Propachlor RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < 0.5 0.5 N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Simazine (Princep) RBLK N/A 0 /ag/L < I I N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Thiobencarb (Bolero) RBLK N/A 0 ~tg/L < I I N/A 08/27/01 Acceptable Surrogate Results Analyte QC Type Surr. Result UCL LCL Date 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene LCS N/A !09.4 %Rec l I 0 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene LCSD N/A I I 1.3 %Rec I l0 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable 1,3-Dimelhyl-2-nitrobenzene RBLK N/A 107 %Rec 130 70 08/27/01 Acceptable BSK StarLims Run #: 25545 IllllllllllllUlll~lllillilllll Ins~ment ID: HPLC1 Analyst Initials: TIMC Mefl~od Number:. 531 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Sgike Spk Matrix Analyte QC Type Spike ID Result Units or RPD RPD Conc Cone I JCL LCL Date 3-Hydroxycarbofuran LCS N/A 30.2 p.g/L 100 30 ND 130 70 08/28101 Acceptable AIdiearb LCS N/A 29.7 pg/L 99 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldiearb Sulfone LCS N/A 29.3 pg/L 97 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Suifoxide LCS N/A 30.9 pgtL 103 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbaryl LCS N/A 29.7 pg/L 99 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbofuran LCS N/A 29.9 pg/L 99 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable M elhomyl LCS N/A 30.8 pg/L 102 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Oxamyl LCS N/A 30.4 gg/L 101 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable 3-Hydroxycarbofuran LCSD N/A 30.1 ~g/L 100 (,.33 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable AIdicarb LCSD N/A 30.9 pg/L 103 4 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfone LCSD N/A 30.0 pg/L 100 2.3 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfoxide LCSD N/A 32.9 lug/L 109 6.2 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbaryl LCSD N/A 27.2 pg/L 90 8.8 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbofuran LCSD N/A 30.6 /ag/L 102 2.3 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix, for MS/MSD Page 17 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above UCL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: LowEr Control Limit BS'K ^ ^,_ LABO OKIES QC SUmmary Report 09/05/2001 BSK Submission: 2001080337 Client: California Water Service Co. Date Submitted: 08/0712001 Project ID :' Project Desc: Bakersfield : BSK StarLims Run #: 25545 IIIIlllflllllllltllllllllllllllllll lnstru,nent ID: HPLC1 Analyst lnitials: TIMC Method Number: 531 Analyte Results Matrix % Rec Spike Spk Matrix Analyle QC Type Spike ID Result Unils or RPD RPD Conc Conc UCL LCL D:/te Methomyl LCSD N/A 31.6 pg/L 105 2.6 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Oxamyl LCSD N/A 30.7 lag/L 102 0.99 30 ND i 30 70 08/28/01 Acceptable 3-Hydroxycarbofumn MS 132659 32.2 lag/L 107 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 ,~cceptable AldJcarb MS 132659 32.0 pg/L 106 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfone MS 132659 31.6 gg/L 105 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Aldicarb Sulfoxide MS 132659 33.0 gg/L 110 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbaryl MS 132659 32.7 Iag/L 109 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbofuran MS 132659 30.3 pg/L 101 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Methomyl MS 132659 33.0 gg/L I l0 30 ND 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Oxamyl MS 132659 32.6 gg/L 108 30 ND i 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable 3-Hydroxycarbofuran RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/28/01 ,4cceptable AIdicarb RBLK N/A 0 ggtL < 3 3 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable AIdicarb Sulfone RBLK N/A 0 ~g/L < 4 4 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable AIdicarb Sulfoxide RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 3 3 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbaryl RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 5 5 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable Carbofuran RBLK N/A 0 pg/L < 5 5 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable Methomyl RBLK N/A 0 lag/L < 2 2 N/A 08/28/01 ,4cceptable Oxamyl RBLK N/A 0 Itg/L < 20 20 N/A 08/28/01 Acceptable Su rroga/e Results Analyte QC Type Sun-.'Result UCL LCL Date BDMC LCS N/A 99.8 % Rec 96 i 30 70 08/28/01 Acceptable BDMC LCSD N/A 105.4 %Rec 96 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable BDMC MS 132659 109.3 % Rec 94 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable BDMC RBLK N/A 96 %Rec 130 70 08/28/01 Acceptable Approved by: ~//, ~ %Rec: Percent Recovered Parent Sample: Sample used as background matrix for MS/MSD Page 18 of 18 RPD: Relative Percent Difference OOS-High: QC Result Above [ICL UCL: Upper Control Limit OOS-Low: QC Result Below LCL LCL: Lower Control Limit 2001080337 08/o7/200 .[~~ANALYTICAL I CA_WATER_SV TAT:Standard Analyses Request LABORATORIES, BSK Submis 87070 III!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Chain of Custody 1414 Stanislaus Street Fresno, CA 93706-1623 Requested Analyses (559) 497-2888, 800 877-8310 (559) FAX 485-6935 Address Project, Quote or PO # FA~ # Sampled bY: m~"t,r-~ ~ ~ p~"~St" Comment or !~"~ i ' Sampled Sampled Sample Description/Location ( ..... Matrix Type: L - Liquid S - Solid G - Gas Additional Services: Additional Services Authorized by: Type of Hazards Associated with Samples: Rush Priority: [ ] - 2 Day [ ] - 5 Day { ] - QC Data package: Level 11, 11! or IV (circle one) , [ ] - Formal Chain of Custody (Signature) , t,~,~nature . Print Name" Company Date Time Rece?ed / Relinquished .:.:~,~.::~:,~>~?.~:~..~:~~~,-~ ....... .=~. ..... .....~ ..'::v...,;'~.x,~%~:~.?':'.:.'.:~ :..'~:,-~:..:~:~...-.:.'~.z~',~,:... Notice: Payment for service~l ,red as noted herein are due in full within 30 days troll hen nye ce6 f not so pa d, account alances ate deemed delinquent. Delinquent balances are subject to month y service/re-billing charges and inter~ ~, ,l~t~rl ~1 I 119¢¥~ n~r re, e~nth la~& n~ annllen R,qK A AR~naialn~ ghall b~ nnlitled to recover On delinQuent accounts, coats of co lect OhS. ncludlncl attorneys' fees Incurred prior to or in litigation whether concluded by judgment, settlement, comprorn}se, .Pacific Wood ?reserving OF BAKERSFIELD SAFETY AND TRAINING ATTENDANCE FORM EMPLOYEE Analytical & onsulCing Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107268-1 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/23/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 08/08/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18: 00 sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area Old Lab # 0107106-3 Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents Results' Units DLR Method/Ref Aquatic Toxicity LC50 > 750 mg/1 400 LC50 /4 rton, Lab Operations Manager Method Reference . . 4. California Dept. of Fish and Game DLR : Detection Limit for Rep0rting.Purpose~.~ mg/kg : milligrams "per kilogram (parts per million) mg/1 : milligram per litel~ (parts per million) ND : None Detected NSS : Not Sufficient Sample This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ; 8a kersFiel~, CaliFornia ~3308 F~ ~ 1 ~ 3gS-~O~g (X~ 25 lO Aclu~tic 'i'oxici~y. 96-~our LC~a $.~ c~n~ ~ Flow: Stad~ Tank Volume: lO liters A~rndon: Si~julu_Bubbl~ Acra((¢n in ~1.1 tanks Acclimadun Tem~: ~ C . . 5oHca~ur:.Output contrah~ Dura'Cycle; ~0% Cycl~ Time: I mlnu~ Shaker: Tim~: Or~un~s~: F'uth~nd minnow ,Sp¢cics: ~imc¢~lcs erm,ef~ Source: pH udjusu~n~ ruclulr~( I Yes (~u (sc~ con~l w~rksh~et) Avg. Wclsht: ~,~ Nl~llf~nnl curriur ~nl vent ruqulred: [ ~ Ycs [~u (sec MeOl. I mmlrol work sheet) Nu. Or~nnisms/cunc; I~ Dilution ~Va~er: ~s CaCO.~, m~l , ~S Caqq~, m~l ~mho/cm I InRbl 'I Z'-/Frr -45 Hr '/Z Hr rd R'r / 4309 Armour Ave. : Turnaround Time: Zalco Lab # Bakersfield, California 93308 Project'F~le~ · I~ RUSH By:. ,. '~'x .. (6611 395-0539 '·" ' OExPedited (1 Week) FieldLog#' ",.. :~-- ~,~ ...... Fax [651) 395-30$9. Ich Chest ~, ?i'('{!: . Temperature.°C [~ Routine (2 Weeks) Work Order # : Address 0 FAX # Res~t,s .... City, State, Zip I Rei~ort~ttj~ntipn ~' ~"~1~ G~'~ ~,~!"' ' ' S~D-~iLab # $~.m~d.~..~_.~.~,,~~by: ,~_~'~. ~ J Employed .... by: · ~ :' i ~,,,~J ! I -- · Date Time Typo~ [1 , · - ; - · · Containers .~ Sampled Sampled See Key Below ~' Legal ~samplo uescnptlon # Type* m ' 8 § Remarks -, ~, .. ,.. .~_ . , . .. . · NOT~: ~pl~ are di~d~ ~ days after r~ul~ are re~ unl~ o~er ~emen~ ~e made. .... * V.VOA ~us sampl~ will ~ retum~ to client ~ d~ ~ at ~nfs e~. ;~? ~:~: ~ [' K~: ~Glass P-Plastic M-Metal T-Tedlar ' ;.: ,.~.,.~:: "W,Water ~-Wa~eWater S-Solid P-P~roleum ·L-Liquid O-~her White- Office COpy Yellow- Lab Co~ Pink - Client Copy ,.~.~'~, ~: :: ~. ~ A-Acid, pH<2 (HCI,HNO3,~SO4) S-NaOH+Z~c C:Cau~ic, pH>10 (NaOH) ZALCO I BORATORIES, INO Analytical & Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107128-1 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/12/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/16/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area Old Lab # 0107106-1 Sampled by Ron Saylor CAM - Title 22, Chapter 30 Article II Extractable Concentration Constituents WET, (EC) Units STLC DLR Method/Ref Soluble Concentration Chromium, Cr+6 2.5 mg/1 5.0 0.5 6010A /1 , Arsenic, As 2.9 mg/1 5.0 0.02 6010A /1 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 07/16/01 SS // C c ~'~. J~hert~, ~ab~Operations Manager Method Reference 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting TTLC : Total Threshold Limit Concentration, mg/kg STLC : Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, mg/1 in extract WET : Waste Extraction Test : pH 5.0 Solution, 0.2 M Citrate Deionized Water for Chromium VI This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. Analytical & Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve -. Laboratory No: · 0107128-2 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/12/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/16/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area Old Lab # 0107106-2 Sampled by Ron Saylor CAM - Title 22, Chapter 30 Article II Extractable Concentration · Constituents WET, (EC) Units STLC DLR Method/Ref Soluble Concentration Chromium, Cr+6 2.1· mg/1 5.0 0.5 6010A /1 Arsenic, As 2.3 mg/1 5.0 0.2 6010A /1 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 07/13/01 SS cc: (~'~ .... ~i~ ~the~on/h~b 6perati~ns Manager Method Reference ' 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting TTLC : Total Threshold Limit Concentration, mg/kg STLC : Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, mg/1 in extract WET : Waste Extraction Tes~ : pH 5.0 Solution, 0.2 M Citrate Deionized Water for Chromium VI This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies on y to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ZALCO IL BORATORIES, IN Analytical ~ Consulting Services 4309 ArmOur Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107128-3 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/12/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/16/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area Old Lab ~ 0107106-3 sampled by Ron Saylor CAM - Title 22, Chapter 30 Article II Extractable Concentration· · Constituents WET, (EC) Units STLC DLR Method/Ref Soluble Concentration Copper, Cu· 18 mg/1 25 0.5 6010A /1 Chromium, Ct+6 3.1 mg/1 5.0 0.5 6010A /1 Arsenic, As 3.8 mg/1 5.0 0.2 6010A /1 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 07/13/01 SS cc: ~-~ .. ~ .ethod Reference y~> ~m ECe~o~,' Lab Operatio.s Maria.er 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting TTLC : Total Threshold Limi~ Concentration, m~/kg STLC : Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, m~/1 in extract WET : Waste Extraction Test : pH 5.0 Solution, 0.2 M Citrate Deionized Water for Chuomium VI This reporl is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ZALCO I BORATORIES, INC Analytical ~, Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107128-4 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/12/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/16/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area Old Lab # 0107106-4 Sampled by Ron Saylor CAM - Title 22, Chapter 30 Article II Extractable Concentration Constituents WET, (EC) Units STLC DLR Method/Ref Soluble Concentration Chromium, Cr+6 2.5 mg/1 5.0 0.5 6010A /1 Arsenic, As 2.7 mg/1 5.0 0.2 6010A /1 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 07/13/01 SS ~ .7W-~-~Ji~m/~th,e~n0: La~ Operations Manager Method Reference ~ y / / 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition DLR : Detection Limit for k'eporCing TTLC : Total Threshold Limi~ Concentration, mg/kg STLC : Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, ~/1 i~'-~ extract WET : Waste Extraction Test : pH 5.0 Solution, 0.2 M C. itrate Deionized Water for Chromium VI This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zolco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ZALCO IL BORATORIES, INC Analytical ~ Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93~08 FAX (661) ~95-~069. Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-1 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area # Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents Results Units DLR Method/Ref Copper, Cu 210 mg/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr i00 mg/kg 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, As 89 mg/kg 1.0 6010A/1 cc: / / Ji~~erton, Lab OPerations ~anager Method Reference 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition mg/L : milligrams per Liter (parts per million} ug/L : micrograms per Liter (parts per billion) unlhos/cm : micro~uhos/cm at 25 C ~r~hos/cm : millimhos/cm at 25 C ND : None Detected N/A : Not Applicable DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting ~'urposes MBAS : Methylene Blue Active Substances This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ZALCO IL BORATORIES, INIC Analytical Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 ,- ~,~,~ ..........~ Bakersfield, California 93308 'FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-2 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample Type: Solid DescriPtion: Wrapping Area ~ Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents Results Units DLR Method/Ref · Copper, Cu 190 mg/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr 120 mg/kg 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, As 65 mg/kg 1.0 6010A/1 cc: Date ~alyzed: 07/11/01 16:36:04 SMS ~. ~ ~/~/Et~rton, LJim E..~erton, Lab Operations Manager Method Reference 1. EPA SW~846, 1994 3~d Edition mg/L : milligrams per Liter (parts per millionS' ug/L : micrograms per Liter (parts per billion) ~ umhos/cm : micromhos/cm at 25 C mmhos/cm : millimhos/cm at 25 C ND : None Detected N/A : Not Applicable DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting Purposes MBAS : Methylene Blue Active Substances This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. ZALCO I BORATORIES, I Analytical ~ Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 .... ~ Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-3 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 ° Contract No.. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area # Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents Results Units DLR Method/Ref Copper, Cu 370 mg/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr 120 mg/kg 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, As 100 mg/kg 1.0 6010A/1 cc: Date Aalalyzed: 07/11/01 16:36:12 SMS ~."~ /~'i ~ ' / Jim E~rton, Lab Operations Manager Method Reference / 1. EPA SW-846, 1994 3rd Edition / mg/L : milligrams per Liter (paints per million> · ug/L : micrograms per Liter (parts per billion~ umhos/cm : micromhos/cm at 25 C mmhos/cm : millimh0s/cm at 25 C ND : None Detected N/A : Not Applicable DLR : Detection Limit for Reportin~ £'urposes MBAS : Methylene Blue Active Substances This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for .report alteration or detachment. ZALCO BORATORIES, INI 'Analytical ~ Consulting .Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-4 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area # Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF.D~NALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents Results Units DLR Method/Ref ' Copper, Cu 240 mg/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr 85 mg/kg 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, As 68 mg/kg 1.0 6010A/1 Date Analyzed: 07/11/01 16:36:18 SMS ./~~ ///~ cc: ~/Jim~erton,// Lab Operations Manager Method Reference 1. EPA SW-846 1994 3rd Edition ! mg/L : milligra_ms per Liter (parts per million? ug/L : micro~rams per Liter (parts per billionS. umhos/cm : microm2%os/cm at 25 C mmhos/cm : millimhos/cm at 25 C ND : None .Detected N/A : Not Applicable DLR : Detection Limit for Reporting Purposes MBAS : Methylene Blue Active Substances This report is furnished for the exclusive use of our Customer and applies only to the samples tested. Zalco is not responsible for report alteration or detachment. DAVID JANES OILFIELD SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT 24,50 MOHAWK BAKERSFIELD. CA 93308 {805) 323-5754 FAX Message If you have trouble receiving this message, please call at the number(s) listed below. Company, . Department Number of pages Subject:, . Including this PdwlcgcdlConlidcrRial inlbrmaliun may be contained in this {~c$imilc and is intended only Ib~ thc u~¢ of thc addressee. If you a~c not thc addressee, or the person responsible fo~ delivering g to Ibc person uddr~,,cd, you ma} not copy or dchvcr this to anyone CIS~. if you receive this facsimile by mistake, please nou$ us m,mcd~atcJy by telephone (661-323-5754) Thank you. AVAILABLE IN FIRESAFE DESIGN PRESSURE RATING . (~ ' O ~ SIZES; Y,"-I" 2000 WOG 1 - 60DY - ASTM A.351-748 CFSM Stainless 8 ' 2 - END CONNECTOR -- A~M A-35~-748 CF8M AISI T-316 S[~inle= Ste~ - . 3 -- BALL - AlS) T-316 S~inle~ 4 -- ~EM - AISI T-316 5 - GLAND NUT - 6 - SEATS- G~ass filled T~fon* 7 - STEM PACKING - GI~ fill~ Teflon* 8-- ~EM BEARING - Gla~ filled Teflon' g - HANDLe.--AISi 304 St~inle~ ~0 - HANDLE NUT- ~8-8 Stainlo~ 22-121 1.~ 4-~-,2'~~ 1- ~ 5.'~ ., 75 ~nf~s to F~I S~: ww-v~sB, ~ I i, C~s C, Style 3, End ~e~lon A. M~ NACE Std. MR-01-75 AVAILABLE WiTH STAINLESS BALL & FiRESAFE OESlGN ' ~ -- BODY - ~TM A-216 G~ W~ ~fl Steel 2 - END ~NNECTOR - ~TM A-216 Gr~e W~ ~. ~1 AISI 12L15 ~rbon * 3 -- BALL -- AISI 12L15 Carbon Steel, ~ro~ p~ 5 --GLAND NUT -- AISI T-316 ..... 6 - SEATS -- Glass filled ' ~ [[. 7 -- STEM PACKING -- GI~$ tilled Teflon' 8 -- STEM eEARING - Gla~ filled Teflon' 9 - HANDLE - S~eel, Plated A 10 -- HANDLE NUT- ~eel. 11 -- HANDLE GR}P - Viny~ NOTE: Stainless Stem ~ G~d Hut Standard 23.061 % 3 2-% . '4, 4.'~ 23-081 I 3- ~ 2-'4 ~ 4-~ 32 .... L Conforms ~o F~eral S~; WW-V?.~8:~ 1.1: ~s~: Sty~ 3, End ~nn~l~ CS~O ~E~ T99 03 S~NHC ~I~O d~O:TO TO OZ des ~ 09/10/200i i2:30 80522267J I~< THORPE BAK PAGE 02 OSCAF- Corp. "OMNI - SEAL Resilient Seated Butterfly Valve "OMNI-SEAL" Butterfly Valves are It manufactured in accordance with the specitlcations from MSS SP-67, Manufacturers Standardizatio n Society and API-609, American Petroleum Institute. Latest revisions. Both Lug · fao % Bi. dlrectlonal factorf t~ted valve product. and Wafer series valves are designed for ANSI 125/150 lb. class flanges and are rated at 200 PSI · Krtended neck design for ample applfcat~on insulation. WaG service. · One piece / unbbody con~t~uctlon of c~t iron "OMNI-SEAL" Butterfly Valves are 100% d~nedto accomod, Ue boa ,4NSf and DIN £ tanged. factory tested in both directions of operation to . .-~ assure a ZERO leak age rate for many years of · J~ntegrai mounting flange will accept all $~yle$ of hundlevef, multi-turn mttnuul beer end power Bubble -Tite service. "OMNI - SEAL" Butterfly Valves make an o Oilimpr~gnuted bronzeteembush. inet fo life even during e~t~nded periods of inactivity. excellent choice by combining the balance of an Lw4.er$ o~erating torque to ea~e operation manually economical valve with the performance you or whenpow~rcd~siste~ expect in a Commercial, HVAC and an Industrial butterflyvalve. · One piece resilient stat with molded in o-ring eliminates the need for adth'ti(mui Valve body dezigned to limit ~e~ compr~z~ion "OMNI- SEA!/' Butterfly Valves are opt~num~,ncn~ionr. available with ~ltany options and accessories · One piece r~$i#ent seat hoz molded in (integral) taccdcd for thc typical butterfly valvcapplication, u-ring ~al lvr upt,a' and lower va~ye :hulu; Wvr~ a4th dix c edge hub s~alr to proWde a &~ublt ]tern sea/. "OMNI - SEAL" Butterfly Valve Options: o 7~o pi¢ce :no dezign eliminate, the need /or bolt~' or pi;t~ to attach ~haft to dire thereby rfmoving · Disc materials: Ni Cu~st~d DucliJz Irun, Brona~, 316~a. potential leaktMOt ofmeth'a. ~n;ol~iece~ho.l~ dexign allow~ for a reductiOn in disc thickne~ that tt~.dting · Seat materials: Bona - N, EPDM, Vllon &Spe¢ials. less ob~ntction in w~etway which re,alu in tower C, · 10 l)ositlon Lever or Gear Operntor~. factor~ · E;lectric Motor Opcrator~. · Sultableforopen left oropen ;~ght ot~erdtion- · Field changeover and ~eld replaceable seat are · Pnuernatie Cylinder Operators. siandard design features. · 4~halu Wheel Operntor$, Square Operating iquts and Cranks. S-d ~S60 ~ I9~ 03 SBW~[' OI&~O dLO:IO IO OI daS 09/10/2001 12:38 88532267i BK THORPE B4~K PAGE 83 FIGURE NUMBER MATRIX 2101 - 01 - 0400 b 8 ? 0l I~ 12' 0 P~ ~ PSt 2~ W~ DRY ' W~ DRY W~ DRY ~50 200 190 250 ~2S 300 330 450 420 550 450 ~ ~ 200 ~ 2~" i ~ G~ ~sb0 2000 "Cv Factors' FLOW IN G~LONS PER M]NU~ ......................... 2 ~ ~112 3 4 '5 G ] 8 10-- ~"~e~ ........ ~3o ~ 3~ 650 ~Do ~o 3~do ~' 5~o0 ' 7~ ,-~.~-~n .......... 1T ~- 21 39 73 154 ~09 363 ~OTM 625 , FPS ~ ~ull ~en 157 245 353 62~ 902 J 14t~ ~,512 "~ '~25 :~:~.~ ruff ?n ~ ~ 6~ 88 157' 245 ] 353 628_ 9~ I 141~ ~'d ~S60 ~ TS9 03 SBW~C QIA~Q ~80:TO TO OT ~aS ~9/10/28ei 12:38 88532267 ~i< THORPE BAK PAGE 8d Engineering Information: OSCAFCORP. T,M. Meets MSS SP.67 & API-609. Latest Revision. , OMNI - SEAL Series "1000" 2" to 12' WAFER znd LUG L DIMENSION T.,A, aLE (inches~ .... ~,_~ .. -[----~ ..... ~ .... ~-- ~ ,~ .~ ,~ .~ .~ .~ . .... ~ · .~----~ ~-~ .... : .... ~ ~;~'- . ...... ~,.,~ J UNC ~ U-C U~ U~ UNC U,C U~ U~ .... ~. , ....... ~ ....... ;-~ I, 7 x i .,. BILL OF aATERIAL / SPECIFICATION t . ' ........ ~a ~ " S'd CSGO SE~' T99 03 SBW~C OI^~O dSO:TO TO OT daS ~ - 09/10/2801 12:38 B85322B~ ~< THORPE BAK P~GE 05 2 YEAR * PRODUCT 'WARRANTY! OSCAF Corp. s~ands behind the product we manufacture with an exclusive 2 Year Limited Warranty. If the product fails any time during the first 2 years from date of purchase OSCAF will repair or replace the Butterfly Valve product, if the valve Js found to have failed due to Materials or Workmanship. How can OSCAF Corp. give thi.s unprecedented warranty7 The reason is simple. 'OSCAF Corp. has been manufacturing Butterfly Valves and their compon~.nls for many years. Through these years we have learned what it takes to make a valve properly. Why does OSCAF Corp. give this unprr, cedented warranty? OSCAF Corp. fe~ls that if our customers take thc time to size the piping system correctly and apply the proi~r trim to the mexiia and application served, they should be able to rely on the product they' ye chosen to install. On your next installati, or~ call your local O$CAF Corp. representative. They'll be glad to assist you in making thc right choice for Butterfly Valves. *Comact your O~(;AF Co~. fq)~eoatalive for ¢omi~lue ~1~. OSCAF Corp.. 9-d £§60 EaE 199 03 S~NHC GlfiHG d60:IO I00I dos ~SEP 12 '01 08:54AM JOHMSOMS BOILER P.1/B ]'~'~"~~~ JOHb~SON'S BOILER & CONTROL INC. FAX CO~R $11EET TO: .............................................................. ' F~X ~: ...................................................... FROM: ......................................................................... NUMBER OF ~A~E8 INCLUDINO COVER SII~ET: ~ IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASI~. CALL TIlE 24 liOUR PItONE BELOW. 2440 8mdb Gearhnrl Ave. I~lmQIh Johnso.sboller. tom Telephone (559) 237-7772 Fresno, Cnltf. 93725 BOILEI~$ BIJRJqER$ CONTRO]~ Fnx ($S9} 237-1745 SEP 12 '01 08:S4RM JOHMSOHS BOILER I p.~/$ TU.1146-1 ~ ]pARKER BOILER CO. ~ 8B FACILITY . I BOIL COMPANY/ADDRESS: ODEL NO.: .... SERIAL NO.: PHONE: CONTACT: EQUIPMENT REQUII~EO: 1. Combustion Analyzer 4, Tube Inspec Ion, Wrar~ch, Plugs~ Gaskets 2. Gas Pressure Gauges 5. Orifice Drills 3, Draft Gauges or Manometer 6. Barometric [ amper Weights I. PR_.ELIMINARY ANA,L-ySIS (REVIEW.WITH OWNE R) 1. .CHECK THE OPERATI.I~I.~ PRESSURE OR TEMPERATURE. Operate the boiler at the lowest pressure or temperature that will satisfy the Icad demand. This will rn~llml~:e heat And radiation losses. OeterTnlne Ihs pressure or temperature that will be used as a basis for comparative combustion ~nalysis before and after tune-up. / . _2. ~CHECK OPERATING HOURS. Plan the wor~ Icad so that the boiler operates only the minimum hours and days necessary to perform Ihs work-required Less operating hobrs will reduce fuel and other costs. For boilers,subject to retrofit and Tune-Up Rules a fuel meter will be required to prove ~u~l consumption Is less than the therms/year limit (for regulated areas). 3. .qHECK INSULATION. Check condition of (o r absence of) appropriate insulation on all cabinet steam pipes, return tank, heat exchangers, storage tanks, etc. Lack of insu[ ~tion will significantly increase fuel usage. 4. ~HECK AIR SUPPLY. Sufficient fl'ash air sut ,ply Is essential to insure optimum combustion and the area of openings must be in ~.ompliance With-local codes. Air openings,'nust be kept wide open and clear from restriction. 5. CHECK VENT. Proper venting is essential ~ ) assure efficient combustion. Insufficient draft or over-draft promotes hazards and inefficient burning. Check to be sure thai vent is in good condilJon, sized properly and with no obstnJctions. COMMENTS: ____6. Perform an A__~S ~ combustfon analysis With alwarmed up boiler at High and Low fire if possible. In addition to pdnt out from Combustion Analyzer, also record: A. Gas Pressure at burner:. High fire. .."W-C. Mad lire "W.C. Low fire ," W.C. B. Draft below draft hoOd or barometric damper: High fire . "W.C. Mad fire ~"W.C. Low fire ." W.C. Preferred values are: 1) Drafl hood: less than (- .02" W,C.) 2) Barometric Damper:. (- .04 to..06" W.C.) as a 7#nimum. C. Steam pressure or Water temperature in and out of boiler. Steam pressure psi Water temperature in · F Water temperature out °F D, Check rate on boiler if meter Is available: , MBTUIHR COMMENTS: / With above conditions recorded make the fo/lowing ch~ck~ and corrective actions as necessary: I II. ~C~HECKS & .CQRRECTIOI~S 7. CHECK FOR CLEAN BOILER TUBES & HEAT_TRANSFER SURF.~,.C. ES. Internal build-up of sediment and scale on the h~a~ing surfaces creates an insulating effe~:t that quickly reduces efficiency. A 1/16" of scale will reduce efficiency and increase operating costs in excess of 14%. External build-up of soot and sediment will have a comparable effecL Excessive fuel cost will result if the boiler is not kept cie an. ~ surfaces, remove scale and soot, assure proper boiler water flow and flue gas flow. COMMENTS ON INTERNAL & EXTERNAL TUBE CO ~IDITION: / K OIL T M B~wDowN P~. ~ff ~r and ~e proper Boiler Weter T~etme~t mu~~~c~ ~oslon. Daily flushing en~ proper blowdown taus{ be employed to eliminate sedimen~ and scal~ build-up on a ~ea~ ~ller. COMMENTS: ..___._9. CHE.CK FOR STEA..1.t4 LEAKS. Repair all le aka immediately as even small leaks at high pressure quickly add up - considerable fuel and water treatment losses, le sure there are no leaks through the blow-off, drains, safety valve, by-pass lines and at Ihs boiler feed pump. COMMENTS: CHECK BURNER CONDmON. Dirty burners or burner orifices will cause boiler efficiency and rate to decrease. Clean burners end burner orifices thoroughly. To c eon burners effectively all bumem must be removed, blown obi with high pressure air and checked for obstrucllons, all ~ ~ocumulatsd sediment, dirt and carbon must be removed. Thru each burner orifice run a proper size drill thru the ho~e. Rep lace burners on orifices. Check I~or smooth lighting and even flame. Confirm proper gas pressure. COMMENTS:, IlL SAFETY CHECKS 11. Test pdmary and secondary tow water c~ntrols. .12. Check operating and limit controls (Pressure, te npemture, high and Iow gas and flue gas spillage). Operating Control =t~si High Limit psi 13. Check pilot sal'ety shut off operation. 14. Check safely valve pressure and capacity to m, ;et boiler requirements and trim pressure. Lift relief valve with Cul, tamer pre- approval and Customer pre.effengement to pa~ for replacement If required, or Insure that Customer will test reliol valve on a monthly basis. It is important that the vane be rp-seated properly. 15. While Laklng combusUon readings with a warme~ up boiler at high fire parietal adjustments and analysis as follows: A. Adjust boiler to fire at rate. Normally 4"W.C,,Irecord pressure. "W.C. B. Adjust draft to obtain efficient clean combusi on at bolh high, medium & Iow fire, use values given in S~ep 6 as a basis. CO value should always be below 400 PPM @ 3% 0a. If CO is high, increase draft by adding weights to barometric damper. This will lower CO and increase 02. Norms 0~ levels wal be be[ween 5.5 - 7.5% at high fire and 8.5 - ~2% at Iow fire." CO is still present with preferred dra[t and p'oper high tire gas pressure, then lower gas pressure until CO is less than 4[ PPM ~ 3% 0:~. (Check to ensure boiler ligh ~ offs are smooth end safe at reduced gas pressure at both high and Iow tim.) C. Check and adjust opera,on of modula§on conb'oller. Insure proper efficient and clean combusUon thru range of firing rates. (When above adjustments and cea'actions ave been made record da~a.) COMMENTS: V. FINAL TEST. ~16. Perform a final combustion analysis with a war ed up boiler at high, medium & Iow fire if possible. In addition to print out from Combustion Analyzer, also record: A, Gas Pressure at burner: High fire ....~.C. Med fire 'W.C. Low fire "W.C. B. Draft below draft hood or barometric damper: High fire_____"W.C. Mad fire.. , "W.C. Low fire. .,..' W.C. Preferred values are: 1) Draf~ hood: less than (- .02" W.C.) I 2) Barometric Damper: (- .04 to - .06" W.C.) as a minimum. C. Steam pressure or Water temperature In and out of b~ller. Steam pressure psi Water ~emperature inI ~ F Water temperature out. ° F D. Check rate on boiler if meter is available: I MBTU/HR (Attach printout from combustion analyzer to this mpc ~. Customer ~o retairl copy also.) COMMENTS:. TUNE4 !P PERFORMED PARKER BOILER CO. DATE OF INITIAL VISIT: 5930 BANDINI BLVD, LOS ANGELES, CA $0040 DATE OF FINAL VISIT: PH: (323) 727-9800 THE BOILER HAS BEEN CHECKED AND TUNEI~ PER THE REQUIREMENTS QF THIS TUNE-UP PROCEDURE FOR ATMOSPHERIC BOILERS. TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE:, DATE 08/21/0i TUE 12:19 FAX 619 ~55 1997 Rob Dennison ~001 Arch Wood Protection 4654 50t~ ,'~ San Diego, CA .92115 Phone: 6'19-255-1996 Fax: 6~19-255-1997 FAX To: Ron Saytor Date: August 21, 2001 Company: Pacific Wood Preserving From: Rob Dennison Fax; 661-836-0766 Pages: .~ jc~ Phone: 661-833-0429 cc: Subject: Console Maintenance Guide ,J, T~-OI~LEGH'o~T~ ~1 ~, ~.~j b~ .......... Ill ~ .~ ~ ....... ",~ ' " i ..... ' ............ 08/2~/01 TUE 12:19 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison PLANT HA [NTENANCE The following list ,is intended only as a very approximate l,.tlid~ si,tc.e ti() t~o pla~s ace exactly the.same or have identical equEpmenC.., ~F~C.. more deCca}led infor~tion, see the black. Treacing'PlanC Haincenance Ha'nua]', BAiLY'~:" ~.~. .. . . .~ .. ..' ...'...:...'... ..~...... .... :.- ~ ...:~.:.~. · . -... .. . : .. , ,...~ ... .:. ~..' ~ ;.-'' .-.: . · · ....... :.. : . I. Plant Air b,-'Draln~al.l'iilCecs inclu~ing:che~'~o0re 91F60 [iiCer regulacoc thac supplies air ~o ~he transmitter!. · · d. Check the operation of the air dcye~ . 2. Hod~e"' Doo~''''~ '~ ' :': "' ...... ' ' ": '": ..... ' : '~ ' ':': " ' '" :~' a, Hose db~ '°r ~iPe Ct~ea~"doot .seat and ma~gnB sucface. b. inspect the dooc &askec. . a. Chec~ump packing for excessive leakin&... ., .~;... ~EKLY '" buarin~s are used). ::. .- . : .... .-...' .:: :.. · . .~ .: , :' . :. ~.. HO~I{LY .... · "{ ;' :' : ..... ""::' '~" ' '" . ... .: :'..'.......:..:::...-. :~.-' .. .'- : ~ .. . ::: ':'. ~. Ciean ouC cyI!nder.. . :. ..... -'. ':.'{-..' ~ .... ... ::. .-.. 1.: . -.- . -.i ..... :' ~ "'' "' -. ' "' "'""' " ': 2. CkeCk Che'' operation of all au:omated valves , make :s'.u~e' 'cl{ey ~orkin8 smoothly. '-. :.-:: .. · . .;¢ b · 5. Oil behind the [ocktn~ ring o[ the ~odg~..Quick Ope~i~B.]loot. .- -~ ;~. .':.':.. .. .... -. :. :: . ,. · : ~:.~:: ....= .: ..: ..... ~ : .. /..... · . . .: ..: - :. : 08/21/01 TUE 12:20 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison [~]003 CONSOL~ HAINTE~ANC~ A. CENE~AL HA[NTENAN~E. *-1'. =~l~e air suppl~, tO t;he console 'should be kept oil and moisture free to insure proper ~rkiu~ co~diC£o~s for ~he pneumatic inscru~entat£e;n. Console should be kept as dust and race; ires as possible. 3. :fa part of the cons0~e ~r~a~s.it should be repaire!d as soon as possible. &. The console can £unction vith several pieces of equipment broken but it is' in your best interest not to leg chis'happen. S. ~AINTENANCE OFT HE YARIOUS ,CONSqLE 1. Hoore 91F60 fi;Lief regulator.' . a. Drain ft'lte~ daily. b. Change the Jilter element annually. ¢. The ou:pu£ from :he re&ulacor should be sec ~or 2~. psi. a. Part numbe~ 'rs i'iai ........................... : ........ b. It is not. cost ef£ective to repair this /tee, defective'replace it"~i:h a ney one. 3. Hoots 2 pen r~corder a. Pen rips should be replaced ~hen they are dull or.,aorn. b. Keep both pen assemblies in ~orking order. c. Clean the stabilize restrtctors once a year DC Ii pen oscillates. - d. Keep recorder free from ink spil..~~ffdl}ru~- e. Hake sure air supply is as oil free as possible. f. See black Plant ~sintenance manual for further mai~ntennnce instructions.. " a. Clean the restrictions b. Hake sure air supply is as oll free as possible. ' t. ~ake sure air supply Is a~.~ll~free as ii. If transeit:er is lealini replace the rubber diaphrases. ii. Hake sure air supply is as o£1 -{res as poss£.b.l¢. iii. Clean the reskriccions ann.ally. 08/21/01 TUE 12:20 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ? i. :Nake sure air'supply is as ~il ~r-~~e a~ passible. ' iii. ·Hake sure the vacuum transmit~r pr0tectbr'~valve iv. If it is defective, replace..tt ~i~h a a. Old style, .ode1CH-i&9 incandescent. ii. Replace. bulbs as necessary.-,. ....... b. It is not cost effective to repai.r"this'i~em~":i~'i~- 'a.'Barksdaie DPDIT-HI8 b. This svi[ch s~eps consol; f.rom..rai.se pcessure toli:h°ld·pr~Ssur~:', or if.. y~,. have :Knob. AdlusCable;.--Vacuum:-Control ,':.i:~':' c0nCrols the c.The switch is.'.set to step. the ~.onsole.to"ho.ld PressUrd{'5. Psi. be'i°~ ~e..~ressure.set.lpoint.o~ to:/cont:rol.:.vacuumtO'.~ithin d. The ad~s~nt sorer·si$ ·located. behind.-a.:cover'.~nLthe~'Side of the sv£tch, lC s~0U!dal~ays beadJusted:.as~.a-"p~SUre s~i'~ch. e. It is not'cost effective to re·pair this item, if b. Both s~itches a;~ uaed in the release pressure step. c. PS-I should 'be set to close at 20 psi. decreaslnibpressu're'- '";' d. PS-2 should be set to Close at 65 psi,' decreaSin~'!Presb~re~ e. It·la not..cost .e£fec.ttve:to..rePair..thi.s ite'mi.'.:lf i-t 'iS 11. Vacuum ~ttches [ a~d' 2. (VS-[ AND V$-Z) '"'::'" '""' ..... aa Hodel ~umber~ CCS-6812~G.I :.. ,.. .-. b~ This unit contains..two, separate, s~itches,-.°ne' ~0~t~ols the 08/21/01 TUE 12:20 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennlson ~uoa c. VS-I ~s ~eC ~o close a~ your desired initial' vac:u.m control d. VS-2 ~hout~ be ~eh-to close a~ 5'' ~erea~in8' vacuum. e. It Is no~ cost eff~t, ive to re~ir'thi~ ~tem iE 12. Injec~ion/Ref.usal toucher.. '" a. T~9.types oi coun~ers,.used. '-" :', i. O1~ type - A~ 336D " ii. Ne~- ~ype - ATC 3~6D : b. lC is no~ cos~ effective Co cepaLr this i~em, If defective x'epla,:e t~ eith a ntv ATC 13. Contac C relay. · .... a. ~odel n~ber, Poc~er and l~mfleld ~PAI:IAG b. ~o repair Ls a~ailable for Chis ~2em, if i~ is defective replace, ic rich a ne~ one. a. ~el number, ATC 328 NOS ~l~e delay relay. b- ~-6, ~lnal vactium cutoff timer. c- ~-7, drain: :cycle .timer. I~. Time delays ~ .and .7. (~-3-and a. TD-.3.used as. a ,~lme..dela~ ehen hhe consol~ steps refusal ~!s ~to~ ~e~. In the. desired ~lme.' ~odel Amperite NO3 .. c. No re.ir, is available for:~his item, 'if {t is defcc~!~e~.replace, lc. vith a-.ne~ ',one. ; : I6. ~re preasure re~utacor.'- ' .' - ~' b. ~ke sure air supply., ls as oil' free as possible. ~' ' c. ~ally clean t~e reatrichors -by preasiu$ the cl~aui~; plumber !- Replace. relays every- -5 ~ '6 mil'l~on ii. Relay A Is a 3P~ ~yp'e of' re~ay~ . iii. Rclay~ B and R are a ~P~ ~ype of relay. 08/21/01 TUE 12:21 FAX 619 255 1997 ROb Den-nison ~006 ~£ the swLtch needs to be adjusted, see the Tenor programmer service manual. c. Tenor s~i:¢h. i. RepLace s~/tch~every 750,000 operations. ii. Every. plant, should maintain at least 3 spare .Tenor switches. ~.. :.~:. iii. If the programmer drum and switches need al~&nin§,-' see the Tenor programmer service manual. 08/21/01 TUE 12:21 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~007 .... :.TROUBLESHOOTING'-".. ( A. CONSOLE TIHERS~ There. are five (5) Tenor timers in the console. They are identi~a.l. The timers have.~djus~abl~;..tlme scales.'thaC 'range :from 6' seconds to 60 hours; i If. you suspect a timer is defective, che~k to See"if the orange .light on it~s front,.at the I2 o'.c.lock position, ii illuminated, This indicates that power.its supplied to this t/wet. If it is running, check.to see what time scale the timer is set~at,, someone, may have.chaaged'.it. The final test to decide 'if a timer is defective is to anplug it ~com the socket and swap it with any :~f. the others,.. Since, they plug'in, there!is'n0-wiring invol~ed in'plUgging ~.~':'~nPlugging,..... ......... ." B. CONSOLE RELAYS: iThere are eight (8).;:P&B'KRV-IIAG relays:.'in the back og of the console. The~ Plug in, sO ,if-yoU suspect''a defective ~elay, it is easy :o chang? i: ~ith another. .. -' .- ' : .... . c. CONSOLE PROGRAHlqER{ The "heart" of the automated'Consol~t is :he Tenor programmer, lC is located in the rear'of.:'the-console usually on the left-hand side. The programmer is.approXimately..26g~log~¢"~ith a small gan on one end and a long plastic #drum" with a row of'3l'.~t{ches alongside. This programmer operates all pumps...valves$ timers, and switchers durin~ the automatic cycle. Fori instance, there is a svitch for the vacuum pump~ another '"' got the'ak~ay 91lVa,'a~oC~r;.'f~r.'~h~ iaffgial '~acoim' timer,'"'etca "Th~; sw$'CCheg ...... k ." are mounted on a long! ~iack.bar. Each .switch.'has:a flat'arm'~."th a rolle~'0n' the end'.' By placing a iplastic ps& in the drum in line vith a Particular "' "" svitch, you can cause a,pump.:o come'on in a certain step. 'The ps& causes Che s~i:ch 'to close, i ;i . -. ' ::'..- ". .' "'"'" .: .... It is possible to chan~e :the sequence of pumps and valves by removing and movir~ pegs. Although ;it is very unlikely~ it'. is' pogsi, ble a s~i'itch, could fail. In the particular step ~he.~e y0~.are having a problem, it is easy to. check the switch. The !s~tcch wilI be"pUshed"back by a peg. Ii' you push the s~itch's flac arm back'ia~d the pump.or.valve .operates,'~then the ps& is not pushing the switch back far enough. SomettmeS~ the problem is-the peg ts too small. Other times, the-arm o~ the switches' worn or be&ins to'give too much. ~ou can either stick a :small piece of tape on the peg or bend t. he snitch arm (roller end) toward the drum. (This muse be done when there is no peg on the drum at that' parttcul'a~ point.) If several switche~ are not maKl~ complete contact~ the black bar..tibEt holds all of the s~itches may necd..to be adjusted closer to the dtue to. ensure complete closure. : If this does not correct .the ~alfunction, the s~itch may need ~o be remov~'d and replaced.- There are'two Allen screws on the black switch ~,ar ~hich hold the switch in place. 'The wires are soldered Co the aw/Cch and :he connections are very sell and dell'cate. Great ca~e must be exercised;in t'eplacin8 s~itch on the programmer.and the care taken with the soldertng:.ls critical. A replacement switch kl~ is .available from Hic~0u. 08/21/01 TUE 12:21 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~008 The likelihood of any 'failure-in the programme~ swt'tc~es '~s 'V~g:ry:sma'll. Having a switch arm which needs bending is more-common than ha,wing a.defective switch although both!'a~re'.highly untikely..: ''' =' :'"'" :"'"' The dependability of :'he tenor'Programmec iS aUch'tha~ Ygu cal..have confidence in your automated:consoI~e':gor many'years''t° come. ;.,' On the programmer drumi~ :there are numbered rings on each end..,.. The black, ring (on the opposite end feom:':he'fan) is numbered '! tO 26. By following down ' from the ~! in a vertical line, you wil~ be following the...ro~i.~or .~he PegS.. ' used in step'~l. :The.black"r:ing.s'numbe~'iidenei.fy.ihg ro~S' b~''step'~Umber~ The silver ring on t.he','b~ttom ('fan end-) iS not' i~ ll~e with the top ring.. There is a red pointer next to the silver ring. The red pointer indicates 'the step or row ~hich the..,.programmer'.is..~urrentlY executi~. ": ~raen the ~ed pointer.~$s ~iined:'uP with.' Step No,' '4,"$tiP:~ No:"4 ig"'Curr~ly at the switches. If you follo~.th/ pointer'uP the. drum'tO the top, you ~lll qee ChaC this particular .rO~ is step #12. ~hen las:alignR or re-oven& pegs, you must use the black ring' to find-the'actual'step number You ar'~ lookir~ for. The stepping process of :he-'Tenor drum'~s'C6n[rolied b~. th~'dr.iVe.':c~nCrol. unit. ~is parc of :he unit is usuallY'l~aCed directly ~nder the drum.'. The. replaceable components o~ chis unit are the break ~dUle, drive module~ "A". : relay, and.."B".re!ay.i.?:~If the d~ua"vill n~t.:s:ep 'a~'ail,"':h~n ~he drive module may be defective. If' the drum turns continuo,isly,, then :he. de~ecCive, parrs .may b~e~. the: 'B' relay or' t~e:~re~k'"~odu:~e~' .'. ~ith each automated console, we supply prints .o~.che.console. vLring diagraa '.~ and prints of the :en~.r~;~drum..char.:;i Thisi'dru~ .CharC'.iden'tifie~-~here:the'"Pegs are and shows what should be opetat'i~g in each step. This :ha, vt. is. very helpful in. understandingithe, au:oma:tiC, seqUence a~d.~'n~::ro'~bl~i~h0°t{ng'your system. I~ you make any change to your. program, it would be to your benefit.'- Co inform Koppers :of this.for.-thei'r ~e~er~nce'and":futu~e Use'L' D. NO PO~K PKESE~ :AT THE CONSOLE~. LIG~S 00 NOT COHE ON .. . . ~: ~ '."., , .? · .... .:...~. '....' Il Check.Ci~cutC..~breakar"a6::ilO".~oit:l.oad:.'cen~r.· ...... 2. Check circuit brea~e-r in ~o~er'rear of consort. 3. Check' att a. Is air'compressor ~orktng? . . ': b. ~e. receiver tank pressure &suBs 100 psi.- c- Is valve; to lnatrueenC~ air:.p'iPin~'heade~ ~'p~n d. Is the. ARO filter/regulator outputtin& at least 90 psi? 6. Re-set ~ir~sa~eCy a~itch ........ a.. Cocated?:~t~*ide.:of"consO'leo-~'on th~'std~"of:~e~'ASCOS~ '- station.' b. Is the air p~essure at 'the'SWitch 60 psi. or 08/2~/01 TUE 12:22 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~009 c. Is 110 volt power, present at the switch? 5. Check pressure safety switch (located on a. Reset s~.~tch. b. Is II0 volt power present at Uhe switch~ c. ~eck: ~o see ~f the ~itch.is se~ to trip at the '"' ='~* pressur,=, normally 180 psi. 6. Pay the over0~e el.'ec't~lc hill for treati~ ~plant. E. CONSOLE IS "ONCe' :B~ IT ~ILL N~ OP~ A~gTICALLY: .(Step' light shows initial 'vacu:um bu~ automatic light ~tll not. ao~ o:a.) ..' --, I. Is the door' Closed light on the console graphic panel on~ . : 2. Check cylinder .door to see that., it is closed far cai, ugh co trip- thc door sw~t~h (ae least 3/4 o.f full vedge). " 3- Is the do~r~ switch VOrki~ properly~ . . ,. ~ '" a. ~nual~y;'trlP the switch co insure that ~e d~r':closed light works, adjust limit switch arm if necessary. .: b. Is 110 vole ~wer at the switch? 4. Check all manual (black) goggle ~i~che~. ~ey mus!: al! ~ do~. -' '-' 5. Check :he Manual/Off/Au:cO selector switch co see if .it's in-the "auto" position. F. CYLINDER IS tN iNITIAL VACUUM B~ VACU~ P~P ~E'S N~ Rl~. ' ' . 1. At ~tor c°n~rol. : cent.er.. . .check .breakem.and press re-;seC'.battonL' -' 2. Check for i1'0 volt power on wire ~46 air-.console ,ter~inal s~rip.- 3. Nake sure Tenor switch ~ 17 is functioning properly. G. VACUUH PUMP RUNS BUT ~0 VACUU~ IS BEING D~ ON THE CYLINDER., 1, Is Hedge saio~y valve ac cylinder door closed? 2. Is the vent valve closed? , 3. Ia the vacuum valve open? '=.:, ....;.~ .... :..... .... ... , · 4. Is the 4~ay valve in t.he vacuum-~sl.tlon?. ':. ' "...' 5. Is the vacuum control valve closed? - .' '8. '- se~ Black: Haintena~ Hanual Under Nash pumps. .--', :' ', '. H. VACUUM GAUGE 'ON CYLINOER READS 20" OF H~ BUT CONSOL~-. R~:CORDEK :'PElq A~D VACUU~ GAUGE DO NOT AGREE ~I~ IT. a. is ~he~e~air"gupply":(20 psL'):"~o'the 9~cuue'[ra;ts~itter? b. la ~he~e .any output from the trans~itter-(3 c. If no ogtput, t~ry cleanin~ the transmitter. d. Is the vacuu~ crans~tc~;er~ p.rocectgr...valve open! ~I~ ls,.mounCed 'dlre~ti~ .under' ~he-'vacuum.. ~ransm!c~er...Only"used'.~ith a ~oore ~. If ther~ is an output form th~ransmi'tt~r{ reach{n& the Cousole. ~. If there is no vacuum traasmitter slBnal at the console, Insure that th~ vacuum transmitter, siBn~l is r~achin& :the 'teco'rder 3. S~a your ~}ant Haintenance ~aua~' for 1. Console d°e~*~n0~"h~ve Knob...A~jUscable .Vacuum-Contr~'l'~':' ':" ':' - a.:~'Are' the vacdu~ 'C°~cro.1..and ..the:,ft.nal-.vacuum"s~l~ches:"'*b~ or in b. Check o~eratfon ;0'f' the .vacuum. transmitter, - ..(see: section. HI) e. Check the operation of VS-I inside the console and make . 2. Console ts equ/~ped.~ith-'Knob Adjustable Vacuum Con~ro1/" "''~ a.-'Are= 'the va~u~m cOntrol and the final vacuum b. 'Ch~k? °per~tion of the'vacuUm transmitter. c. Is the .~acUum control valve light ... 08/21/01 TUE 12:23 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~011 2.Is the time scale og the initial vacuum timer set: four the corcect ran&e? ' ' 3. Is Tenor..'.s~teh:'-..#3 ~°rkin§ properly? ': "'CO~ IS X~ ~ VACUa' FILL-~P ~ ~ C~I~gg iS ~: FILLINg. I. Is the. lilt ~tllve: Ope~'?.' : "'~ and the selected. ~ork tank'-openT 3. Is Tenor svi:ch :~2! ~Orking properly? cop level probe and detection of loss o~ 'vacuum- : 2. To determine: i~ th~ cop level' pro~ is"vorktng. :.: : a, Is the fl]il, li&~c on che console coming on? b. Check the ito:p l~vel s~iCch relay. (usually CR-2). c. ~ake sure [that Tenor swi:ch ~t is ~orking. properly. · d. Check the ~ain ~ on AdjusCmene the'top level s~itch~ gee b'la~k .: ....... . :.- Matntenanc~.~n~at for- ad~use~nt :pr~e~re.. .... : .......... :.. .:- . e. Is (he p~Ob~ .ta~n~ ,:o ..the corral position? 'Scs. blac~ ~incen~c~..~an~al ;on Sensall' 502 level svlcch, . [.Is 110 vol~ pov~c present aC she probe on vlre 8-Re~ve pro~e, an4 teat operation by dipping it' in fl. bucket of h= Replace probe if~ de-~ec~tve- : . ~ - .~ . ~ .. ""1' ~ i ...... 3- Console will hoc st~p due eo loss-$~f' ~a~'~m in the c~-i. lnder. a. Check the opera:~on-.o~'the ~aeuOm transmitter; (sets section HI) b. Is Tenor s~iCch ~i vorktng properly? c'. check :he o~rat~on of..:VS-2 in t~ ConaOl~ and ad~ust ,.!~ d. Is 110 volt pove~ present on wire ~75 at H. CONSOLg STEPS ........ FROH'INITIkL ;vAcu~'~OUGH"vAcum' :~I'~ ~ 'A~=.. S P A S0a O . . i 2- Check the o~tatio~xi of VS--2 and adJust'-i~ nfceaeary- - CONSOLE ~XLL ~; STEF.: ~H'~- A~OSPH~IC ABSOR~XON" TO ~I SE'. :PR~SURE 08/21/01 TUE 12:23 FAX 619 255 i997 Rob Dennison . .I I. Is £he atmosph~ric absorpeion/vent Tenor timer.~°rkln&? : (see secCi£on A) . ! .":: , . ?: . "".{. ,': .... . ..... . :. 2. Is the time· stile for ~he timer set to the correct ran§e? 3...''Check' the. ii'.;...!!,-'::r. 1"' '- 1' o.. of'. :~p ~ C0NSO " s*'-s .... '"'" *'' "' "* ~ISE PR~SS~E B~ THE PRESSURE P~P DOES N~ RUN. O. THE 'Is the pressure pump-lfgh~ on the graphic~, panel '.0~? ' , : } ..,~..: .:-. . . . ',. . .;~i . .- ..- -. · .: '.,.." .... :.. i < ? ' 2. AC ~Cor ~'.~n:Co L .c~ntec, Check.breaker. and'press ~i'e-se: button. 3. Check fo~ ?ll;.0':"V )lg power, on wire ~48.'at console ~rmi~al:'strlp : 4. Make sure Tenor switch #16 is functioning 'pro.perly. t~. CONSOLE IS IN :RAISE L{ESSURE,..THE ~RESSURE ~P: IS '~N~X~G~ .a~ NO PRESSURE' IS '~E~G~'BU~LT 'UP IN THE' CYLINDER .... :- -. ...... a, Is ~he' cortes )ondint lithts.-on, the..console.:~raphic'vorkin~ b.. Check f~;il0 V~it:Po~er on vire 159 at the com;ole terminal scrip. .. .:: ... ih. F2} ~or~i~ p~D~rXy? .......... ' ........ ' ' ' d. Is. Ch~ i/i" 's ~le~id 'valve ..work~. ~roperly?. ' ~; ..... ' ' : ' : .... e~ IS ~h~re.~duff:.cXenc air pressure tO operate the".!'val~'ds? (&rester, than~60 psi.) ... / ,;:" ., .' .:.. '..-- .:, .. . .- . - 2. Is:"the pressure ~et. point set aC ~he correct" pres'sure? : 3. Are any o~ 'the fcIlo~t~ valves open? ,. . -. .>:'~':..:. ... .. a vent valve . .. . .:. .. : · , . .. .... ... ...... ....... . b. Hod&e doS~/sai'i:y valve ..... C. Vacuum ~a~e :,,.~ ', '.:' '' ' d..~i11 'Vai'~: ' ' · "" '"'~" ":' "; '~" "' e. Drain suction ~alv~ ...... ' .... ~. Drain 'd~"Sc~ar Valve' .' ' '" a. I~e~" mire pump Eauge"read .less than 20 b . If the pump hai n° 'Eau&e does it feel hot or sound funny? with th~' C~li;nder' [presau're ·gauge? ....' b. Ia '~her~"a't~' s~pp'l~ (20 ..psi).~to.. the pressure: .tranSnliter? .-' d. 'lf'go"out~Ui'. :try cleanin~ the transmitter;':"-? '" e. If there ia:an output form the .transmitters' de 08/21/01 TIlE 12:23 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~013 reachi~$ the con~o~eo Q. CO/{S:~L-[ 'iS '~N THE HO~D PRESSURE STEP BUT ~lLL NOT CONTROL PRESSURE. 1. Is the press~ire ~ontrol valve openin~ and ~los~nE properly? the pre~sure =ontrol valve receivin§.a 3 to 15 'psi- siBnal £rom Ehe Hoore.~ontr, [[er? . ~. Cheek the 0 t~ 30 psi. pressure gau~e that ~s i~ line between loeated'orl to~ o£ the control valve operator.) 3. [s the console g~neratin8 a 3 to 15 psi..stgnal tha~ can be output to tke con~ro! valve. a. Remove F3.~a:i~ tub~r~ f;om ~utput po~ from ~ont]~olle~ check for a~r low.- '. ' · ' b. is SV-2 energized and allovin~ air to pass from ~,orts I and 27 Is 'the pressure tPansaitter functioning properly? (t~ee section ....... · '.' -'; .... : '.' i' '1: ~. - 6. I[ the~e is..a.Y-s:~a/ner"i~ C~e "p~essu~e"':" ......... return lt~t:: ':see ..........i~' it :' needs cleanin§o 7. If chert ia a man ,al valve in the p~essure return 1t-ne make sure that tt is. open.. R. THE INJECTION/REFUSAL ~$TEH IS NOT~0RKINO PROPERL~ I. Is the tank..seleceor station set on the correct'vorlc tank? Is relay #~ (i.n back of console) cltckint? fig not, 2. relay. 3. Is the inJecti·on/rtiusa~ selector s~i[eh set'in :the proper -- position? · ,: .... ' ~ ,.:~... i : '~ .:"' .~' &. If you are treati~ I by ln}ection, check the operation of the ). · I[ you are~rea-~tn~ by'.refusa-l~heik-'~'.he ~°tlo~.l~l~- ...... = -- -- a. Tenor ~Itche~.;]~--7~--TSaS, T~-10, ~'--14~ b. If the refusal tleer'-and-cOUhter do-'not'reset replace time .c. If the c0ns~l¢.-.~kips-~second..refusa! r~plaCe :t~e delay 3' · ' ~ -27- ~014 08/21/01 TUE 12:24 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison S. THE CoN$OLtg ATI4OSPHEP. IC ABSORPTION TO' REL~SE SKIPPING T~E PERIOD. '-'l~_~=Xs the In~jectic 'Refusal selector s~itch in the . . .....~:. ¢.: ....:,.-.'[ ~ .' ::...:, .. !.~: '. L..::~-.~.:ff '-.. :. T. CONSOLE ~Itt F~O~ THE P~SSURE, P~IOD':'TO' R;EL~S~ PR~S'SURE. a. Is ~he re timer vorking properly? (see ~,eccion A) '-:'b'. Is the' t.im~ s, sec Co the correct range? . . .d. Did the .counter. ,reach the".~e'sired numb'e~':'o[' [ a. Is the ~imer ~.0rkl~'properly?' '('~ee se~t0~'A): ..... ( .... b~ is 'thi .~ime..s~ to the correct.raise?... ' ' .. ";' c. Is tenor .... PlO ~or~iu~ properly? d. Did the counter reach the de'sired 'number of counts and.. . reset?:..... ~ . ii '.' ' · "'"'" ' ~' ' '""- :" ' ' ' . ..: .... -.: ........ [~. · : :':~ .~. ~. CON~OLE ~ILL NOT PRESSURE ~D ~EP .~ B~ BACK ... 1. Console 'ls,e~ ~tCh' '. ~a slo~ pressure rely:ass looki~aC 'Ch~ Tenor drum -hich sC~p you ace ~n.'.: (usually. b. If you are in. ~ rep 6~ Check the operation of ~h~,..ac~Spheric c. 'if you are in atep 7, check th~ [olloving. /: ii 'Iai ~the cc ~sole pressure reading, in ,agreement ~ith ,the pressure :ransmit~er. iii'. ~eck .the opera~ion of $V-I and SV-3. . .... " [ . ..'.. .-"..: '.~':,. '' ' .............. [ : :i ' '.,i~- '., ; "' : ..... 2.. Console la not-equ .pped ~ith slo~ prea.s~ce release.. , ..~ ;:..:;:, ~.. a. ~eck the ,opera!;ion of,'.'Che': Pres}ute' aoUCroX ValVe~ b. Check the operai;ion of SV-I. ,08/21g01 TUE 12:24 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~015 VACUUH PLIHP SEpAgA?OR ;5 CHATTERING. . I. Is the vacuum va["c open? ~.*' 3. Is the*manual ~orl t~nk v~lv~ open? U. THE CON$OL~ ~ZLL"}~1OT ~ ~P FEO~ BLOIJBACKTO RELEASE PaESSU~ '1. Is "the cyl~nde-r:etpty.llghc on? ~ :' 2'. Check the bot:Com e~el switch relay (usually:CR-3)- 3. Check ~he boetom eveX~.swXtch,-control box. There X~!a " This adJusts:'the"level switch's sensitivity, Turn i;~ clockwise un~il the rel~y 1~ ghe control box "click~'. If chis adjustment has not. effect, it is possible the level:.a~icch unit:;is, burned out. Check the level. 'sul~ch probe, The hex nbc has'three i(3). 3 or 9 o'clock, Are the vires connected to.t~e right hand se~ x. ~ co~souz w~c~'No~ s~ r~o~ ~su~ss wssstms ^rT~ ~co~m~c~ (vs~rr) ~9 FXNAL[ACU_~. 1. Check Uhe ope~auioh of the atmospheric absorption/verst timer. (see section ~) : ' 1. At motor COntrol:' c nCer,:check breaker and press ~e-a~t "bd~con. 2- Check for ll0:voit power-on v/re ~&6 at c0naOle t~rmSnal scrip. 3. Hake sure Ten~r's~ .~h ~ .17 is.£unccioni~* prop~riy. CONSOLE IS IN FINAL VAC IUl, Js THE VACUUM PUHP-*tS.'ON BUT NO DRA~'H ON THE I. Is Hedge aaf~cy rs.ye a: cylinder-door closed? 08/2.1./01 TUE 12:25 FAX 619 255 199~.... Rob )ennlson : ~]016 "- 6.~'..'-.-'-Does the. pump· :have..~ Suf.f-icien~· "shPply 0f' .Seal' 7. Is the pump leaking .excesSiVely?~' 8. See Black..,Hain! enance .Hanual..'under Hash pumps'; '::'"~ ..... - "' AA. CONSOLE 14ILL .NOT" FROH .FINAL VACUUH-. TO .RELEASE' PRESSURE AFTER 1. Check the o ion of the .£i.na1- .'vacuum· 'timer lobS'ced "in the back o£ the cut, sole. (see sec:ion A) Is the Tenor ..t.i set :for the :.correc~ time-rang~i?'' ' <'' '" 3. Is Tenor s~itch ~15 ~orking properly? · i. ~f your Console has final vacuum cutoff'a{ld d~ai~L'delay. '0nder vacuum see sect .on HH detailinS these systems. ss. COSSOL~ ~Jes! ' ~asssu~k A~'r~ ~iLOW.' s,c~ (vsN~,)"TO' 1. Is the red hand].ed s~itch labeled either modi£i-ed:£ull cell ~or CC. CONSOLE ~ILI. NOT bi'El FROH RELEASE PRESSURE AFTER FINAL VACUUH (VENT) TO I. Check the ?para'ion of ~he.'-.atmospher*lc*.abSorp~ion~.ven~ t~imer (see DD.. CONS0][~;'"IS.IN THEi DRAi!:N 'STEP BUT ..THE. . DRAIN'=:. PU~P 'IS NOT iiRUNNING, ' [. la the. drlain., pua p ligh~ on' the graphics panel.~on? [' " 2. At motor control center, check ·breaker and press ~ie-aet button. ....... 3. Check for, .,i!'10.. vol~.~po~er on '~lre '#4G. at..console "t~!rmina'L..s'~rip .......... &. Hake sure Tenor ~,41l:ch ~ 16 is iunc[ionin8 properl~t. 08/21/01 TUE i2:25 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob DeIltlison CONSOLE IS IN T~E DM .~ _STEP ANn THI~ PLOP IS RUNNING BU'£. ~E CYL~ND~. I. Are ~he drair, suc :ion and discha~g~ valves :open? ~. Is tenor: s~itc l.. !1.8/~rking properly? d. Is the l/i' so~ enoid valve ~orki~ prp~rly~ e. Is ~here sug~i~ ien.t air pressure ~o operate'the 2. ~re any of.: t-h~ :fo lowin~ va!yes opens b. Pressure stlcti~i valve ' ... ..- c. Prcasur~ dl.s.cha;rge valve : 3. ~as the drain pump lose i~'s pri~? a. Does the .drain .~Ump ~auge read le~s ~han--20 psi;? b If ~he pump-has no gau&e does i~ feel hoc or sound funny. 4. Is ~here any vacuu~ present in the cylinder and can y~vur drain pump rune:ion u~det 5. Hake sure Che v~nL ~aEve ts open. 6. If your 'console :ha~. final va~m cutoff- ~nd draih deii,y dnder .... vacuum see secui'on ~H detailing :hess sysCem~. ' CONS0~ VILL NOT STEP FR ~H .'DRAIN TO 2. Check the ~(~em le,,el ~icch relay (usually CH-3). until the relay In he c~ctol box #clicksa. If this-, adJus~men has hoc efgecC, ~.~ a .~ssible the level s~it~h unl~ 4. Check the level evi~ ~ probe.- '~a-hex 'nuc has three le~ers (NSC). on one side. ~ls mus2 be positioned at; either 3 or 9 o~clock. NO. NC & C? 6. Is the drain~ Pump abe ~o drain .Lhe cylinder? -31= 1. Is the'vehc!: ~ open and all vacuum in the cylinder vented? 2. Have you opened :he HodEe safety HH. -FIN~i2C~VACUUM CUTO~ DRAIN. CYCLING' UNDER. VACHL~4- SECTION-'(O~TIONAL) .. Th~s is an op~ona~..u .pac~e:~tha~..~s availab~.f~om .Hick~on, your consol~ may be equipped ~his ~quip~n~'. .If y~r. co~sole has ~his package then you will have ~he' changes !nyour 1. ~e f~nal vacuum )or,ion of ~he .cYC:~ ~ill be...~wo Tenor programmer. ' .... 2. The s~r~p Or.pres ute pump ~ c~c]e o~ and on during final vacuum . ~'is eX:LminaCes ~he need for a lengthy drain step before Cbc charge:i~s fi~shed. of ti~. Thl~ wi 1 reduce power usase and maintenance of the pump. Belo~ is a descriptio~ of the three-timers work with the system vacuum and causes :he to step to :he second final vacuu~ steP. Timer ....is usually se: loc the' amount of :iee=~equired.f.or your. vacuum pump' to reach 25" of ~-7: ~ts timer'contr)ls how often the strip pump cycles during the final vacuum and comp~e~e:st.e)s. ~: is.usual~7 se: for 5 minuets. ~-8: ~ts timer ~ls us ;ally sec ~oc I minuet a~d senses ~hecher the bottom leve~ probe la ~ndl~a: ~& empty or not. If the cylinder.remains empty for :he time specified by T~-~ then the console will step out of' final vacuum. PROBL~S ~AT CAN ~uR::. .- 1. Console rill hoc from' first final vacuum to seco~td final vacuum and the pump will not cut off. a. Check the.o 'o~ TH-6 .. b. Check the 'of Tenor swicc.h #29. 2. Vacuum pump cuts of :before reachin~ desired level, increase the amount of time TH-6 is aec for. 3. SCrip does no~' cycl off and on but the console is st~ll in final vacuum step. a. Check the:°perat: 0n of TM-7. b. Check the ope~cat:.on of the scrip pump. .08/21Y01 TUE 12:26 FAX 619 255 1997 Rob Dennison ~019 The strip pu~p ~[ll not stop a. Is the high le*els c. Are the strip valves open. _d. Check the opel of T~-7. e. Check th~ at!off'of the bottom'.i~ei-";.probe. -' " 2. Console s:t.ep~.;ou~.o£ final.vacuumprematurely. a. Check the-opel 'of the bottom Ievel'probe. . .........: . .., b. Check ~he opel aCion of 114-8. 6. Console ~rtll not step out of final vacuum. a. Check the opel ation of the final vacuun timer. b. Check the o acion of TH-8. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 Business Phone {661) 326~3979 · FAX {661) 326-0576 FAX Transmittal TO: "~C~V C-~o,O COMPANY: (..J~C-.oA. FAX No. ~tS-. '7,44. lq tr~ FROM: ~ ~,,,.r~_s l~,? COMMENTS: D August' 22,2001 Mr. Ron Saylor, Environmental & Safety Manager Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield 560 l District Blvd. Bakersfield, Ca 93313 NOTICE OF VIOLATION - SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE Dear Mr. Saylor: FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZ. E On June 26, 2001, this Office conducted a compliance inspection with regard to ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES hazardous material and hazardous waste, handling practices at your facility. The 2101 'H" Street .inspection also initiated the triennial audit of the Risk Management Plan (RMP), Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 the results of which are included herewith under separate cover. The following FAX (661 ) 395-1349 violations were present during the inspection: SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Califomia Health and Safety Code (CH&SC) Section 25503.5: Sakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 Failure to update the Business Plan hazardous materials inventory for the FAX (661) 395-1349 following chemicals found on site during the inspection:, aqua ammonia and borate materials being used to blend into the listed ACQ and PacBor solutions. PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 California Code of Reg~flations, Title 22, (22 CCR) section 66262.34: VOICE (est) 326-3951 FAX (661)326-0576 Failure to clearly mark the initial date of accumulation on the 55 gallon drum used to collect hazardous wastes generated in the CCA cylinder pit. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. BakersNeld, CA 93301 Tberefore~ prior to September 21, 2001~ please submit a revised hazardous VOICE (661) 326-3979 material inventory form for the aqua ammonia and borate products on site. FAX (061) 326-0576 Furthermore,' all containers used to collect hazardous wastes at or near point of TRAINING DIVISION generation shall be clearly labeled with the date of initial accumulation, pursuant 5642 victor Ave. to 22 CCR 66262.34(e)(1)(C). Bakerstield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Please be advised that failure to correct these violations, or their reoccurrence, may result in formal enforcement actions to be taken by this Office. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please call me at 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. '7239 Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosure: RMP Audit 09/18/01 14:52 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 1378 CONNECTION TEL 14157441917 CONNECTION ID US EPA REG 9 START TIME 09/18 14:34 USAGE TIME 17'20 PAGES 22 RESULT OK 06/24/01 16:43 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 1074 CONNECTION TEL 14157441916 CONNECTION ID USEPA-REG9 SUPER START TIME 08/24 16:14 USAGE TIME 29'05 PAGES 22 RESULT OK · 0 · For more 2n a decade, arsemc- ~ ~ ' andcbrom~um- ree Preserve' treated~voodbas been usedm some ~f tbe world's most environmentally sensitive locations. From tbe~ ristine en~ironmems of national. ~ ads in gustralia,, Hortb gmerica, europe, and Japan, , to ne~gbborbood P ~ygla rounds and bac~7ards li~e ours, Preserve treated wood bas' been used around the 81obe to Prowde a durable budding Product_for oudloor Projects where en~ironmemal~alues and Product safety arePriorities. Environmentally Advanced Preserve® treated wood products are available in from fungi and insect attack that copper alone Would response to concerns raised by public and goVern- not control. Quats are commonly used in household merit sectors of the treated wood market regarding and industrial disinfectants and cleaners and are the use of arsenic and chromium in biodegradable in soil. Copper and quat pressure-treated wood. Preserve solutions similar to ACQ are used for is treated with ACQ?an environmen- the control of fungi and bacteria in tally advanced formulation that is swimming pools and spas. arsenic and chromium free. The ACQ preservative system provides long- term protection from rot, decay and ~esell"¥e [P~s 01~f~el~S termites without the use of any EPA ~l]'~@¥ed Wesillheli'il~g listed hazardous chemicals. ~e~'~©~l~ce ACO Preservative Wood which is exposed outside to the Pl~'OteC~iO~ weather is subject to repeated wetting and drying cycles that cause wood The ACQ preservative in Preserve to swell and shrink, resulting in split- treated wood is a copper plus quat ting, cracking and warping. Preserve system that provides the same level Plus is protected with the combination of protection to wood as CCA preser- of ACQ preservative treatment and vatives against decay, rot and termite a built-in water repellent, to provide attack without the use of arsenic long-term protection against decay, and chromium, rot, termite attack and the effects of ~ weathering. The main active ingredient in ACQ is copper, which has long been established as the most cost- Preservo Plus should be specified for outdoor effective preservative component used in timber building projects where appearance is important preservation. Quat acts as the co-biocide in the and prot,~=ction from the effects of weathering is a ACQ preservative, providing additional protection priority. Preserve's Performance Guaranteed Preserve and Preserve Plus are the only arsenic- and chromium-free pressure-treated wood products backed by a Lifetime Limited Warranty! Ask your retailer for details. Product Features · Does not contain arsenic, chromium or other EPA classified hazardous chemicals. · Provides long-term ~rotection from rot, decay and termite attack. · Can be used in environmentally sensitive settings. Painting and Staining · Enhances worker safety. or Natural Weathering · Wood scraps can be disposed of by ordinary trash collection. Preserve and Preserve Plus can be painted or stained to match any outdoor color scheme. High · Offers a wider selection of treatable timber species. quality oil and latex based paints and stains are rec- · Easily painted or stained. ommended. Water repellent coatings can be applied · Quality control ensured by independent third-party to enhance the long-term weathering performance, inspection. It is important that the wood is dry and free from surface deposits prior to applying any coating, Left · Features a Limited Lifetime Warranty, uncoated, or with clear water repellent coatings, · Preserve Plusis available with built-in water repellent. Preserve and Preserve Plus will initially weather to a natural brown color, eventually turning gray following long-term exposure to the sun. Nails, Fasteners arid Fittings For the best results, stainless steel or hot dipped galvanized fasteners and fittings are recommended. A list of acceptable fastener systems is available from your Preserve suppli- er. Anti-corrosion coatings applied to fasteners and fittings in contact with treated wood will enhance long- term performance. Direct contact of Preserve treated wood with alu- minum fasteners and fittings is not recommended. For more information about Preserve and Preserve Plus treated wood, visit our website, www. treatedwood.com or call CSI toll free at 1-800-421-8661. Treated Lumber and Plywood Applications Specifications, Approvals, Registrations,Preserve and Preserve Plus can be and Awardsused for any building application where protection from decay and termite · Approved by the ICBO Evaluation Services (ER#4981) attack is required. Applications include: (Uniform Building Code) · Decking · AASHTO · Standardized by the American Wood Preservers' Association · Landscaping (AWPA) C1, C2, C22, C4-95, C5, C9, C15, C17, P5 ~ Gazebos · Preservative components registered with the United States · Fencing Environmental Protection Agency o Steps · Australian Standard AS-1604 1997 · Walkways ° AQIS - Australian Quarantine Service · Wood siding · JIS Japanese Standards · Storage sheds · CSA Canadian Standard Association o Outdoor furniture · NWPC - Nordic Wood Preservation Council o Playground equipment · Approved in Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Spain · Piers and docks · Awarded Wisconsin Dept of Industry, Labor, o Trellis and lattice and Human Relations Approval · Permanent wood foundations · Awarded Wisconsin's Governor's Commendation o Sign and mailbox posts · Awarded Wisconsin's Dept. · Planter boxes of Natural Resources Commendation o Wood bridges · Transmission poles Preserve® and P~'ese~'ve Recommended ACQ® Retentions for Various Applications IH]ow to Specify: Preserve Application Retention Uses Pressure-Treated Wood:I (Ibs/cu fl) Arsenic_ and chromium-free Above Ground 0.25-0.40 Decking, fence boards, pressure treated wood produced deck support hand rails, in accordance with ACQ Preserv~,e Standard ACQ - 94 and the appio- Ground Contact 0.40 Fence posts, landscap- priate AWPA Standards (01, C2, Fresh Water ing, piers, docks, etc. 022, C4, C5, 09,015, C17, P5). Permanent Wood 0.60 Wood foundations, Preserve Plus Foundations crawl spaces Pressure-Treated Wood Poles 0.60 Building, transmission Arsenic- and chromium-free and distribution poles pressure-treated wood with built-in water repellent produced in accor- Pilings 0.80 or 1.00 Standard and founda- dance with ACQ Preserve StandArd tion piles ACQ - 94 and AWPA standards The recommended ACQ retention levels tor Preserve Plus are identical to Preserve treated wood as shown (Cl, C2, C5, C9, C15, C17, P5). above. The minimum water repellent retention for all applications is 0.31 lbs per cubic foot. 200 E. Woodlawn Road, Suite 250 o Charlotte, NC 28217 o 704-522-0825 o FAX: 704-527-8232 e-mail: acqinfo@chemspec.com o www.treatedwood.com 41 P/7-99 The Leader in Wood Preservation The Pacific Wood Preserving Companies The leader in wood prese First to the · Advance GuardTM Total Treated HouseTM ?:- ~rogram ~o the ~outhwestern United States. PWP is a new kind of wood preserving company. A technologically advanced solutions provider, who has First wood treater tc figured out how to stay ahead of the competition. The consistently meet AWPA specifications treatin~j lumber industry is fragmented and cyclical. Companies high-density incised Douglas fir with CCA, that service this industry need to be astute and fo~ard thinking. Whether its introducing new products, innovating manufacturing processes or providing First to design, integrated marketing solutions, the Pacific Wood engineer and obtain a patent on a specialized Preserving Group of companies understands its markets size of plywoo~ trailer pad (th'e "Q" Pad). and has the technical know-how, industry savvy and experienced staff to get you where you want to go, when you need to be there. You want fast and accurate service, · e×cellent qqali~ products and to stay ahead of the curve, and you~ competition. With Pacific's innovative products, First to provide ,~ , Pac-BorTM ~reated technical ~×Per{ise and marketing solutions, we can meet sill plate to the · .~ 'continental United States. your needs. You've known us as a solid and competitive vendor, that waS the firs~ to bring you high-density incising c:L' of ..'Coastal Dougla~ t~ir-,to::meet AWPA standards, Pac- other things, Now First wood treater to ncorporate environmental mindfulness into its vision and mission statements. Advance GuardTM Boring ACQ PreserveTM (Total Treated House Program) Cutting (Arsenic and Chromium Fr~) Advance GuardTM Bridge Stringers End-plating CCA Treated Douglas Fir (~es) CCA (WolmanTM) meeting AWPA specifications Export Packaging Copper Napthenate (high-density incised) Framing Guardrail (to industry ~tandards and custom) Creosote Lumber High-density Incising Creosote 50/50 Pac-BorTM Lumber and Plywood Incising Creosote 70/30 (for Sill Plate) Re-Loading Dri'Con~ (Fire P. etardant) Peeler Cores Special Packaging Pac. Bor~~ Piling Staining Pentachloraphenol Plywood Starl°cks~ Poles, Distribution Storage Trucking and Rail Poles, TransmissiOnposts ~ (Treatlng~ TSO~S~rvlce Only) Posts, Round ~ Railr~ Ties ' · ~' Timbers ~ ~an~d~cape Trai~ ~ads ....... ~ T~ee St~k~s ~~ The Pacific Wood Preserving group of companies is the most environmentally mindful and innovativ~.i wbod treater in its marketplace. It is a domi~ant supplier of all treated forest products~ sold into the Southwestern United States, with a well-earned reputation for technological excellence and product integrity. Pacific strives to increase stakeholder value, and to reward the efforts of management and employees who have contributed to its success. ~The Pacific Wood Preserving Group of companies is an innovative, enterprising and ambitious wood preserving business. We offer quality, competitively Friced treating services and treated products to our customers. We consistently introduce n~w products and tenaciously pursue our goals and objectives. Our employees are team members and our managers encourage creative contributions to production, cost control and in,ovation. We are the leader in our field, capitalizing on our technological acumen, innovative solutions and strategic alliances. Our goals are aggressive growth, annual profitability ~.hared by our employees and the maintenance of our leadership position within our industry .opWP NWP PWC ARIZONA PACIFIC: WIDOD NEVADA WlrlE]D I:IAI31F'IC: Wc3rID PRESERVING, INI~. PRESERVING r-ONTAINERS,., INC. P.O. Box 968 P.O. Box 350 P.O. Box 320 Eloy, AZ 85231 Silver Springs, NV 8942c. Leggett, TX 77350 PWPC PWP3 PWP PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING THE PACIFIC WOOD OF CORNING,~NC OF BAKERSFIELD, INC. PRESERVING CGMPAN,!ES ~85S'outh~;~ve. 560i ,District Blvd. ~w~_,.pag,ificwood.com 96021 Bakersfield, CA 93313. inform INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 1. THE PRODUCT .................................... 2 Definition Treatment Safety 2. PERFORMANCE ................................... 4 ~ Surface Burning Characteristics \ Fire Resistance ~ . '~ Termite and Decay Resistance 3. HYGROSCOPICITY & CORROSION ......................... 6 4. STRENGTH & OTHER PROPERTIES .......................... 7 5. CODES AND SPECIFICATIONS ............................ 8 Model Codes Life Safety Code Federal Specifications 6. SPECIFICATION GUIDE ............................... 10 7. APPEARANCE & FINISHING ............................ 11 Gluing 8. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS .............................. 12 9. AVAILABILITY, COST & INSURANCE ........................ 13 10, TIPS ON USE AND HANDLING .......................... 14 11, REFERENCES .................................... 15 12. CASE STUDIES ................................... 16 Dr/con® fire retardant treated wood is produced by a network of treating companies licensed by; Hickson Corporation, ~955 Lake Park Drive, Suite 250, ~'myrna, GA 30080 Fh'e Retardant Treated Wood H ickson Corporation, the History leader of chemical process technology in the wood treating The chemicals used to make This patented formulation has an industry, offers DRICON® Fire wood fire retardant for interior added benefit: stability in higher Retardant Treated Wood with its uses have historically included temperature environments. patented formula as an alternative inorganic chemicals such as Certain proprietary brands of FRT to construction materials classified ammonium sulfate, ammonium plywood treated with inorganic as noncombustible for weather phosphate and, to some extent, phosphates have been found to protected applications, zinc chloride. While these are structurally degrade in roof envi- very cost effective fire retardant ronments. DRICON FRTW has been Containing a superior fire retardant, chemicals, they are also very solu- in use since 1981 without a single it remains stable in high tempera- ble, Iow molecular weight salts degradation failure of this nature. ture roof environments and is which absorb moisture quite read- backed by a 40 year warranty, ily from the atmosphere. There are directories published by unlike any other fire retardant Ammonium sulfate, for example, inspection and testing agencies that list wood products treated for wood on the market today, will pick up so much moisture at a relative humidity of 81% that it fire retardancy. These listings are DRICON FRTW provides greater goes into solution. Mono-ammo- based on surface burning charac- design latitude for the architect, nium phosphate goes into solution teristics. Other properties, such as engineer and contractor, and when the relative humidity reach- hygroscopicity, corrosivity, preser- removes many barriers associated es 93%. If these chemicals are vative effectiveness and structural with conventional noncom- used in fire retardant treated durability are not considered. This bustible materials such as masonry wood installed in humid areas, the booklet will answer many of your and steel. The use of DRICON wood becomes damp, promoting questions about the various fea- FRTW can result in greater safety, corrosion and in some cases mois- tures of DRICON FRTW that affect reduced insurance rates, and ture actually drips from the wood. design practice and applications. easing of building code limitations. The DRICON formulation was Each piece of DRICON FRTW is developed specifically to over- identified with the Underwriters come these problems. It is based Laboratories, Inc. stamp indicating on fire retardant chemicals that the product has a code re- having a high molecular weight cognized clossification for surfoce and very limited solubility. The for- burning characteristics, mulation has not been changed Unlike other producers who formu-, since its development in the late their fire retardant chemicals 1970's and commercial introduc- at the treating plant -- sometimes tion in 1981, with varying results -- DRICON FR chemicals are formulated at one chemical manufacturing facility by trained chemical operators who recognize the importance of ~ ~_~1~1~i~ proper chemical composition and reaction. Each batch of DRICON FR chemicals is inspected and tested to be sure it adheres to the specifications of Hickson Corporation. The chemicals are ~- then sold to a select group of O~1~ quality-minded licensees who pressure treat with the chemicals to the prescribed requirements of Hickson Corporation and Underwriters Laboratories. Fire Relardant Treated Wood ABC WOOD PRESERVERS ANY'I'OWN, U.S.A. 1 NER-303 KDAT 1981 Definition DRICON FRTW is lumber and plywood, pressure-impregnated with a proprietary fire retardant solution. The wood is suited for nearly all interior applications and areas shielded from precipitation. Treatment must be performed at a properly equipped, licensed pressure treating plant. Species Available Following treatment, DRICON FRTW is kiln dried to a moisture Only species that have been content of 19% or less for lumber tested and are currently listed and 15% or less for plywood in by Underwriters Laboratories are accordance with AWPA available. Lumber and Plywood Sizes Standards C20 for lumber and Lumber All commonly required sizes of C27 for plywood. Drying after Douglas Fir Redwood most construction species of treatment to these levels is lumber and plywood can be required to comply with the Southern Pine Hem/Fir treated with DRICON fire retar- model building codes. Ponderosa Pine White Pine dant. Size is generally limited Moreover, C20 and C27 require Spruce/Pine/Fir Red Oak* only by the treating plant's ability that the fire retardant used to Hemlock Spruce to treat, kiln dry, and handle treat the wood be listed in large members. Western red AWPA Standard P17. DRICON Red Pine True Firs cedar and red oak are limited fire retardant complies with for- Yellow Poplar* to a maximum of 4/4" while mulation FR-1 in the standard. Western Red Cedar* yellow poplar is limited to 8/4" maximum thickness. Identification *Millwork Species Plywood Safety & Handling The model building codes require that every piece of FRT Douglas Fir The chemicals in DRICON FRTW wood bear the identification Southern Pine are of very Iow toxicity and will mark of an approved inspection Redwood not harm those involved in use agency, and handling of the product. Lauan Each piece of DRICON FRTW is Normal safety and hygiene marked with an ink stamp or practices for working with paper label bearing the classifi- Chemical Penetration untreated wood should be roi- cation mark of Underwriters Penetration varies according tc, lowed: wear gloves to avoid Laboratories, Inc., describing its species. In FRTW it is necessary splinters, use a dust mask and surface burning characteristics, to have adequate surface pen- eye protection when using (See previous page, bottom etration to insure proper fire pel'- power tools and wash your right.) The mark further identifies formanoe. Penetration mini- hands after working. Ingestion the name and location of the mums are prescribed by tests have demonstrated that treating plant and will show that Underwriters Laboratories for extreme amounts of wood must the material complies with each species they hove tested be ingested before the ohemi- AWPA standards, has been kiln Incising of some difficult to pen.- cai exposure would become sig- dried after treatment, and quail- etrate species of lumber prior to nificant. Tests have shown ties as an Interior Type A, Iow treatment may be common smoke from DRICON FRTW to be hygroscopic product, practice in some locations, no more toxic than untreated wood. Contact your supplier or Hickson Corporation for further information. Fire Retardant Treated Wood Coatings the market today that can legitimately carry the Underwriters Laboratories Because of different testing procedures and requirements, wood with a fire classification mark. However, for interior, above ground applications, the retardant coating does not meet model code requirements for fire retardant DRICON fire retardant chemicals are resistant to attack by termites and rot treated wood, and are registered with the Environmental Protection Agency, All surfaces of wood or plywood pressure treated with DRICON chemicals Laminates have fire retardant properties; fire retardant coatings are often applied to A new line of products using fire retardant laminates which are adhered only one surface, DRICON FRTW is produced under an inspection program supervised by Underwriters Laboratories. Proper treatment is evaluated on onto plywood panels was recently introduced. Due to the nature of the FR the basis of chemical retention, depth of penetration, solution concentra- laminates and their relatively short service history, questions hove arisen con- tions and on fire tests of samples processed with each charge of material cerning their efficacy. Because the FR laminate is generally applied to only treated, While fire retardant coatings can be produced under a supervisory one side of a plywood panel, it offers protection on only that one side, In program, the application of the paints is as important as the formulation, contrast, DRICON FRTW offers protection on all surfaces of the panel as well Proper application and maintenance of coatings is critical to their effective- os throughout the thickness of the sheet, In addition to the one-sided pro- ness and is not covered by an inspection program, tection issue, the new FR products may sometimes "delominate,' or peel off of the plywood panel. Furthermore, coatings ore tested only on one species of lumber and in a less severe tunnel test than fire retardant treated wood. Their effectiveness on Furthermore, some manufacturers' handling instructions caution users to other substrates has often not been established in laboratory tests, repair any damaged laminate showing more than 1/2" of bore wood using their special patching compound. Other noted concerns include: the war- Dual Treatments ranty, which has been criticized as being vague; and, the fact that BOCA rules do not consider the FR laminates as substitutes for FR treated products Testing has demonstrated that preservative treatment affects the perfor- and do not permit them to be used in certain comr0ercial applications, mance of the fire retardant, There are no commercial dual treatments on Reaction to Fire ratings are established during Termites & Decay the first 10 minutes. However, An important feature of DRICON unlike surface coating, the Tests have shown DRICON FRTW FRTW is that it reacts auto- building code requires that the to have excellent resistance to matically when subjected to test be extended from 10 min- fungal decay and termites when fire exposure. DRICON chemicals utes to 30 minutes and the used in above ground, weather react with combustible gases flamespread not progress more sheltered applications. DRICON and tars normally generated by than 10 1/2 feet beyond the FRTW is the only fire retardant untreated wood and converts burners and show no evidence chemical for wood treating regis- them to carbon char and harm- of progressive combustion, tered for use as a wood preserv- less carbon dioxide and water, ative with the U.S. Environmental Wood loses strength in a fire only The FR-S classification denotes Protection Agency. Some species at the rate at which its cross that the lumber or plywood has of DRICON FRTW also meet the section is reduced. The increased a flamespread and smoke requirements of AWPA C31. production of char acts to insu- developed index of 25 or less late the wood and reduces the when tested in the E-84 tunnel Durability rate at which the cross sectional test and shows no evidence of DRICON FRTW is designed for area is reduced. The carbon progressive combustion in 30 above ground applications dioxide and water vapor released minutes. Any species not meet- shielded from precipitation and dilute the combustible gases to lng the requirements for the FR-~; direct wetting as per AWPA C31. help reduce flamespread, classification will be listed with In such locations, where the the individual flame spread and chemicals will not leach, the fire Fire Performance Testing smoke developed ratings. DRI- retardant chemicals are stable CON treatment reduces the and will remain effective for the DRICON FRTW has been tested flamespread of most species to life of the structure. Testing has by several independent labora- less than 15 which is essentially demonstrated that short term tories. Surface burning charac- the same as gypsum wall boarc, exposure to the elements during teristics have been evaluated by Underwriters Laboratories Factory Mutual Research has construction will not adversely and meet model code require- also evaluated DRICON FRTW affect the fire retardant perfor- merits, and found that it meets the mance of DRICON FRTW. requirements for a Class 1 However, all unnecessary expo- As a result of U.L. 723 tunnel test- Impregnated lumber deck. The sure should be avoided. FRTW on lng at Underwriters Laboratories ASTM E-162 radiant panel test the job site should be stored off (ASTM E-84, U.L. 723 and NFPA and the NFPA 258 smoke density the ground and protected from 255 are essentially identical) a test have been conducted by the weather. FR-S surface burning charac- the Hardwood Plywood teristic classification has been Manufacturers Association and assigned to all softwood species have demonstrated the of DRICON FRTW. acceptability of DRICON FRTW The tunnel test compares surface under Department of burning characteristics of tested Transportation regulations for materials to those of asbestos use in mass transit vehicles. cement board and untreated red oak lumber. A rating of 0 is assigned to asbestos cement board and a rating of 100 is assigned to untreated red oak flooring. Flamespread ratings of various species of untreated lumber range from 60 to 230. During this test, smoke emissions are also measured and ratings are assigned on the basis of 0 for asbestos cement board and 100 for untreated red oak. These 4 Fire Retardant Treated Wood Hourly Ratings Some model codes and local building officials will accept the Fire retardant treated wood has a surface burning classification and, by Component Additive Method (CAM) for calculating fire resistance in itself, does not have a resistance rating in hours any greater than lieu of actual assembly testing, The CAM concept entails adding the untreated wood, Fire ratings in hours are assigned to door, wall or deck resistance rating of individual components to quantify the resistance assemblies, The Underwriters Laboratories "Fire Resistance Directory" rating of the assembly, specifically points out that FRTW may be substituted for untreated wood The lumber and plywood used in rated assemblies or CAM listings are in any related assembly. DRICON FRTW can be used as a component usually not identified as being untreated or FRTW, but the model codes of such assemblies in structures where the code does not permit the use generally do require that any wood used in noncombustible types of of untreated wood, construction be fire retardant treated. Descriptions of fire resistance rated assemblies incorporating structural Also, due to wood's natural ability to insulate, wood may be more lumber are listed in several publications, with the following being those acceptable than unprotected steel in fire resistant assemblies, generally referenced in model building codes: For more information on CAM, contact the AF&PA and ask for the · Fire Resistance Directory, published by Underwriters Laboratories. brochure, "Component Additive Method (CAM) for Calculating and · Fire Resistance Ratings, published by Engineering and Safety Service Demonstrating Assembly Fire Endurance," Publication T-20, or contact of the American Insurance Service Group. Hickson Corporation. · Fire Resistance Design Manual, published by the Gypsum Association. · Uniform Building Code, including a listing of fire resistance rated One Hour Wood Truss Assemblies assemblies, Recent testing has provided effective and competitive designs for one For example, the Gypsum Association "Fire Resistance Design Manual" hour rated floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling metal plate connected wood shows a one hour wall or partition assembly (WP 3605) that has wood trusses. Unlike earlier designs, the one hour rating can now be achieved studs covered by 5/8" Type X gypsum board with specified nailing and with only one layer of 5/8" Type C gypsum wallboard applied directly to positioning of the panels. This assembly could be used for interior, non- the bottom chord of the truss. bearing partitions, requiring a one hour rating in a noncombustible struc- DRICON FRTW can be used in place of untreated wood in any of these ture if the studs were DRICON FRTW, In a similar manner, by substituting designs and will enable the use of these assemblies in many building DRICON FRTW for untreated wood, other one and two hour wall and construction types that do not permit untreated wood. These new con- ceiling assemblies can be used in noncombustible type buildings. The struction assemblies provide greater savings than ever before when model codes also permit use of ceiling assemblies with the top mem- DRICON wood construction is substituting for hourly rated steel or con- brahe omitted where only unused attic space is above, crete construction, Hygroscopicity A material which gains or loses In tests conducted in accor- hot-dipped galvanized steel, moisture from the atmosphere dance with ASTM D-3201, there copper, and red brass. as the relative humidity changes was very little difference is said to be hygroscopic. The between the moisture content Other tests have demonstrated more hygroscopic a material is, of DRICON FRTW and untreated that DRICON treatment may the more moisture it will pick up wood. Even when the relative actually help reduce corrosion during periods of high humidity, humidity was increased from the of the protective zinc layer on Wood is naturally hygroscopic specified test level of 90% up to galvanized steel truss plates. If and fire retardants can increase 96%, the difference remained the exposure is such that mois- this attribute from very little to slight. By comparison, typical ture might condense between significantly. Thus, there is no conventionally treated samples wood and the metal hardware, such thing as non-hygroscopic had twice the moisture gain of siding or roofing, corrosion can FRT wood. Fire retardants can untreated wood even below be expected with either treated contain chemicals such as 85% relative humidity, or untreated wood. Even with ammonium sulfate or ammoni- untreated wood, this type of um phosphate that absorb Corrosion environment requires back prim- excessive moisture which can ing with a corrosion inhibitive create problems with appear- Corrosion is the tendency of a paint on the surface of the ance, surface finishing, and car- material to oxidize by chemical metal in contact with the wood rosion of metal hardware, reaction. This process occurs or use of a moisture barrier. The However, the patented DRICON more rapidly at higher moisture same precautions should be formulation only slightly increas- and temperature levels, taken when using DRICON FRTW. es the hygroscopic properties of Historically, FRT wood has been untreated wood. considered corrosive because of excessive moisture gain at The American Wood-Preservers' elevated relative humidities. Association Standards C20 and Conventional types of fire retar- C27 for fire retardant treated dants have caused corrosion lumber and plywood differenti- problems and failure in various ate between "low-hygroscopic" types of metal hardware and Type A products and other more fasteners, and structural compo- hygroscopic Type B products, nents. DRICON FRTW, however, Type A products must remain at has demonstrated no greater 1:(3stene~s or below the fiber saturation corrosion rates than untreated Hot dipped galvanized steel point of wood (28% moisture wood. hardware is recommended for use with DRICON FRTW. Although content) when conditioned at DRICON treatment does not 92% relative humidity and 80° F. Accelerated tests following pro- increase corrosion of bare or gal- This is, however, a rather loose cedures of military specification vanized steel, the galvanizing pro- standard that has allowed a MIL-L-19140 have demonstrated vides an extra measure of protec- wide variety of products to qual- DRICON FRTW to be no more tion for any treated wood. ify. Critical differences in perfor- corrosive to various metals than mance of Type A products untreated wood. DRICON FRTW occur at humidities of 95% and samples were tested in contact above, with aluminum, carbon steel, Fire Retardant Treated Wood Design Adjustment Values Workability For many years untreated wood Cutting to length, drilling holes, design values have been adjust- joining cuts and light sanding ed to allow for the reduction in are permissible. It is not neces- strength of fire retardant treated sary to field treat cut ends to wood caused by the treating maintain flame spread rating. APA PANEL DRICON RATING THICKNESS* RATING and kiln drying process. 12/0 5/16 12/0 Ripping and milling are not per- '" These traditional strength adjust- mitted except on red oak and 20/0 5/16,3/8 20/0 ments are no longer applicable, yellow poplar lumber. Surfacing 24/16 7/16,1/2 24/16 _ Hickson Corporation, manufac- to a depth of 1/1 6" is permitted !~?~?~3,~1~?~¥~j~5~3_,2~i~/~~'~ .......... ~?"~ .............~'~,~1'~ ............. turer of DRICON fire retardant on western red cedar lumber. 32/16 5/8 32/16 chemicals, has thoroughly eval- On other species, these opera- 4o/2o 3/4,7/8 4o/20 uated the strength properties of tions may alter the surface burn- DRICON FRTW including high lng characteristics and will invali- 48/24 7/8 48/24 temperature exposures that may date the U.L. label. occur during the life of a struc- Plywood gluelines shall be Exposure I and ture and is providing recom- Carbide tipped saw blades are face plies shall be Group I species, Allowable uniformly distributed live load mended strength value adjust- recommended if extensive cut- at maximum span for RATED STURD-I- ments on behalf of all licensed ting operations are to be per- FLOOR and RATED SHEATHING is 85 pst for producers of DRICON fire retar- formed. However, DRICON FRTW floors (55 pst for STURDq-FLOOR 48" OC) dant treated wood products, is not as abrasive as many con- and 30 pst for roofs plus 8.5 pst dead load in each case. ventional fire retardants. Always check applicable local *Hickson Corporation does not recom- codes to insure acceptability. Unlike FRT lumber, DRICON ply- mend 5/16 or 3/8 panel thicknesses for wood can be cut in either direc- roofing applications due to springiness. The effects of incising on the tion without loss of fire protec- strength of untreated wood is tion in that surface burning char- not thoroughly documented, acteristics of plywood are Several species of DRICON FRTW unchanged. are commonly incised prior to treatment. In applications where strength is critical use only unin- cised lumber. DRICON FRT Lumber Compared to Untreated Lumber 80° F Fastener Design Values DRICON FRTW has recommend- ed fastener design value adjust- DRICON FRT Lumber Compared to Untreated Lumber ments based on full size inde- pendent testing completed at Virginia Polytechnic Institute. The adjustments for lateral and with- drawal loading of nailed, screwed and bolted joints range Modulus of Elasticit ,91 from 0 to 8 percent reduction. Building Code Acceptance Standard Building Code BOCA/National DRICON FRTW is primarily used as The Standard Building Code Building Code an alternate to materials of allows fire retardant treated wood The BOCA Building Code permits construction classified as non- in Type I and Type II construction FRTW as an acceptable alterna- combustible rather than as an as an alternative to noncom- tive to noncombustible material in alternate to untreated wood. bustible material for specific use,,;. Type I and Type II construction. Most states and cities have Allowable uses include walls for adopted one of the model build- Applications include interior part- fire separation of tenant spaces, lng codes as the basis for their tions, roof construction of one and non-bearing partitions, dwelling local building code. two story buildings, and non-becr- unit separations, interior partitions, '\ lng exterior walls or panels that and many types of roof construc- The model codes do not "accept" are greater than 30' from the tion. FRTW is permitted as Class I any product. Products are ac- property line. Also, fire/party wa Is interior finish. cepted or approved by local do not need to extend above the authorities based on compliance roof line when the roof deck is Also, fire/party walls do not need with code requirements. DRICON constructed of FRTW for 4' on to extend above the roof line fire retardant treated wood has either side of the wail. when the roof deck is constructed completed evaluation by the of FRTW for 4' on either side of the Council of American Building Other allowable uses include wall. Officials National Evaluation architectural trim and canopies in Service resulting in the issuance fire districts and interior wood fin- of NER-303. Although the report ish material where Class I flame- does not result in automatic spread ratings are required. acceptance, submittal of the report to the local authority with jurisdiction often results in accep- tance. See NER-303 for allowable values and/or conditions of use. ~,~'~ _. , ,,~,~.'i~[~i. As with any code report, NER-303 ..... ~, ~,~,~ ~, is subject to re-examination, red- ~~i"~" ':'7 '~. '~°"" "":' I sions and possible cancellation. ~:~ ....~, :.:., ~. :. The following paragraphs briefly . .f outline where DRICON wood is ..... permitted according to the '~?:~%nE~, model building codes. ~ HUD DRICON FRTW is acceptable in HUD projects (HUD materials release no. 1261). Fire Retardant Treated Wood Uniform Building Code Other Standards Life Safety Code & FRTW The Uniform Building Code allows DRIC©N FRTW and many of the The life safety code does not ref- FRTW to replace noncombustible licensed producing plants offering erence fire retardant treated materials in non-bearing partitions DRICON treatment are also quail- wood. However, Health and for Type I and Type II construction; fled under Federal Specification Human Services Technical Bulletin exterior wall frame in Type III and MIL-L-19140, for which the Navy No. 32, issued in September 1985, Type IV construction with certain Department acts as custodian, does permit use of FRTW in new restrictions; and any Class I interior covering the fire retardant treat- nursing homes, custodial care finish, ment of lumber and plywood, facilities, and supervisory care FHA minimum property standard facilities being constructed under No. 2600 for multi-family dwellings Life Safety Code provisions. also provides for the use of U.L. labeled fire retardant treated In one story construction the entire wood. structure may be built with DRI- CON FRTW and automatic sprin- DRICON FRTW also complies with klers will not be required provided the New York City MEA (199-81-M, assemblies are used to provide 200-81-M), City of Los Angeles (RR one hour fire resistance ratings, 25122), California State Fire just as for steel construction. Roof $~ ~u'~o~c°Se Marshal, State of Wisconsin, and structures of multi-story buildings Factory Mutual Class 1 Roof Deck. may dso be built with DRICON FRTW without automatic sprinkler In any applications where FRTW is systems or a concrete slab, pro- being considered, the local code viding the top story ceiling has a authority having jurisdiction has minimum 45 minute finish rating, the final determination of accept- the attic space is unused and ability and should be consulted unaccessible and hazardous before a final choice is made. areas of the top story are sprin- klered. For details, request a copy of HHS Technical Bulletin No. 32. ' UNIFORM BUILDING CODE '- 9 FOR FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD IN WEATHER-SHIELE)ED APPLICATIONS PART 1 - GENERAL 1,01 PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION Lumber and plywood shall be pressure treated with Dricon® fire reta'dant chemicals or other listed chemicals with follow-up inspection provided by Underwriters Laboratories, inc, Each piece shall bear the UL label or imprint certifying a Class A/Class I flamespread rating, an Interior Type A prcduct and kiln dried after treatment (KDAT). Each piece shall carry a National Evaluation Services report number. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 LUMBER A1 Provide dressed lumber, S4S, unless otherwise indicated. B. For light framing provide: 1.Studs: _(grade, any species) (grade ond species) or (strgss grade) 2. Other light framing provide: ____ .(grade and species) or (stress values) C. For structural framing provide: .(grade and species) or (stre~s values) 2.02 PLYWOOD A. Provide performance rated plywood for floor, wall or roof sheathing_. (panel grade) B. Provide plywood for floor, wall or roof sheathing (grade) (species) 2103 FIRE RETARDANT TREATMENT A, Dricon® fire retardant treated wood manufactured by one of Hickson Corporation's licensed producers, - OR-- Fire Retardant Chemicals A. The fire retardant chemical provides protection against termites and fungal decay and must be registered for use as a wood preservative by the U,S. Environmental Protection Agency. B. All fire retardant wood must have a flamespread of less than 25 when tested in an extended 30-minute tunnel test in accordance with ASTM E-84, NFPA 255 or UL 723, C, All lumber must be kiln dried to a maximum moisture content of 19 percent after treatment. All plywood must be kiln dried to a maximum moisture content of 15 percent after treatment. D. All fire retardant wood must comply with the requirements in AWPA Standard C20-96 for lumber and C27-96 for plywood. E. Carbon steel, galvanized steel, aluminum, copper ond red brass in contact with the fire retardant treated wood must exhibit corrosion rates less than one mil per year when tested in accordance with Federal Specification MIL-L-19140 Paragraph 4.6.5.2. F. The fire retardant chemicals used to treat the lumber must comply witt- FR-1 of AWPA Standard P17 and be free of halogens, sulfates and ammonium phosphate. G, Testing on the fire performance, strength and corrosive properties cf the fire retardant treated wood shall be recognized by issuance of a National Evaluation Services Report. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 FIELD CUTS Do not rip or mill fire retardant treated lumber. Only end cuts, drilling holes and joining cuts are permitted unless the material carries a ULI apProved milling after treatment classification, All cuts on plywood are considered end cuts due to the nature of the product. 3102 APPLICATION Dricon® fire retardant treated wood used in structural applications shall be graded or span-rated material that has been applied using the design adjustments provided in NER-303, ~ corrosion resistant fastener, such as hot- dipped galvanized nails, or be~er, shall be used, 3.03 FASTENING Nailing schedules and panel spacing shall be in accordance with the American Plywood Association's Design and Construction Guide for Residential and Commercial Uses (1993), The use of plyclips is also required where specified by the APA. It should be noted that APA does not permit the use of staples for untreated plywood. Dricon® FRT plywood shall be nailed and not stapled, 10 Fire Retardant Treated Wood Appearance Finishing Gluing Treatment with DRICON chemicals Stains, sealers, varnishes, and The DRICON treatment does not may slightly darken or yellow the paints can be used with DRICON adversely affect the performance wood. On most species this is FRTW. Paint systems may be of nonstructural construction barely noticeable, however, red- water or oil based. Stains, espe- adhesives, mastics or contact wood lumber may darken and cially dark colored semi-transpar- cements. No significant differ- Douglas Fir may yellow. Grain rais- ent types, should be solvent ences in effectiveness between lng will also occur. Marks made based to avoid Ioossible surface DRICON FRTW and untreated by stickers used to separate the crystallization of the fire retardant wood have been found. layers of lumber during the kiln chemical. Flammability of finish drying following treatment will be should be considered prior to There has been only limited expe- noticeable on lumber. For struc~ application, rience in structural gluing of DRI- tural use, this is not objectionable. CON FRTW. Some types of isa- The pressure treatment and subse- A light sanding and thorough wip- cyanate and urethane adhesives quent kiln drying may result in a lng should be performed prior to have been found to perform well. the application of any finish to In any type of gluing, and espe- slight waviness in plywood; for nor- mal applications this is not objec- provide a clean surface and to cially in structural applications, an tionable as the plywood can be smooth any raised grain. In the evaluation should be made of the straightened when nailing, case of rough sawn lumber or rex- specific adhesive and materials to tured plywood, wire brush the sur- be glued. Be sure the DRICON DRICON FRTW, when specified, face prior to staining. FRTW surface is clean and dry to can be special ordered with the obtain the best performance. good face free of sticker marks Take precautions at the job site to providing the thickness of the ply- protect the treated product from wood is not more than 5/8". Slight exposure to rain or extreme irregular water marks may at times dampness if finishes are to be show on such material, applied. As with untreated wood, excessive surface moisture can Also, DRICON FRTW will not stain cause finishing problems. It is rec- plaster, wall-board, or other cov- ommended that finishes be tested ~ ~ ~ ~ , ering material. DRICON FRTW is in an unobtrusive area to insure supplied at a moisture content of satisfaction .... 19% or less. When used as rec- ommended, the excellent hygro- Normal marking from treatment scopic properties of DRICON FRTW will show unless surface prepara- will prevent any staining problems, tion prior to finishing is conducted. ~ ~" ~ ,~¥ ~ ' ;" .' ;'.".' When clear or semi-transparent Odor finishes are to be used, take care- ~ ful note of the appearance char- ,~,~ ~ . ; ' No different than that of untreat- acteristics of DRICON FRTW. ed wood. DRICON FRTW is ideal for use: Some examples: a. Where other materials would a. Studs, wall plates and fire permit a fire to spread without stops with metal lath and ~ restriction from an ignition piaster or dry wall construc- --~ source, tion for interior non-bearing :,r' walls and partitions where ~ b. In areas of construction where noncombustible construction there is inadequate water is required (see codes for spe- supply or fire protection, cific details). c. In indoor construction staging, b. Roof systems including the scaffold, workmen's shanties, deck, purlins, joists, and metal etc. during construction or plate connected wood truss.- repairs of expensive equip- es. ment or multi-story buildings. c. Air return plenum framing in d. In areas where sprinkler sys- HVAC systems. tems cannot be readily installed, such as framing d. Studs, joists and sheathing in under raised platforms or the- sensitive areas housing com- ater stages, floor framing, puter and electronic systemE. walls, stud areas enclosed under roofs and framing for all e. Shelving, bins, tote boxes, types of remodeling work. work benches, pallets. e. In health care facilities where f. Wood members in fertilizer a versatile and economical and chemical plants where construction system is desir- highly corrosive conditions able, but life safety cannot would require continuing be compromised, maintenance of protective coatings on metal systems. ~ g. Buildings in recreation areas such as camps or lodges, which may be at a high fire risk because they are not inhabited during certain sea- sons or are in areas of inade- quate fire protection services. h. Architectural applications, such as interior siding and millwork. 12 Fire Retardant Treated Wood DRICON FRTW is widely available in the commercial Insurance Rates market. It is distributed coast to coast, in the United States and Canada, from wholesalers and dealers For commercial applications, most states have supplied by manufacturers licensed to pressure treat adopted the insurance Service Office's (ISO) com- wood with DRICON chemicals. Treating service of mercial rate schedules and recognize FRTW as a slow your lumber or plywood is also available on a special burning material. When all wood in a building is fire order basis from DRICON producers, retardant treated, rates for the structure and its con- tents are usually lower than for untreated wood and To locate the supplier nearest you, contact your very similar to noncombustible construction. Specific licensed producer or Hickson Corporation, insurance rates for DRICON FRTW will vary from state 404/362-3970. to state as they do for all building materials. Costs Blocks, plates, and studs of DRICON FRTW can be used for the construction of non-load bearing parti- The cost of DRICON FRTW is determined by the local tions in noncombustible classified construction with- distributor and varies depending on species, grade, out penalty in most of the 50 states. Similarly most location, and other economic factors, Even in cases states give insurance recognition where roof decking where the purchase price is higher than a competi- is constructed of DRICON FRTW. The large risk under- five noncombustible material, the in-place cost is writers like the Industrial Risk Insurers (IRI) and the often lower. DRICON FRTW is installed by the carpen- Factory Mutual System (FM) recognize and often rec- try trade, easily handled and readily modified on site. ommend fire retardant treated wood so the insured If necessary, later remodeling is also simplified, may gain the benefit of lower premiums even where Furthermore, since DRICON FRTW is considerably codes do not require the use of treated wood. lighter weight (approximately 10% heavier than untreated wood) than some alternative noncom- Several major insurance companies have also provid- bustible materials, savings may be realized in support ed rate reductions in homeowners fire insurance for structures and transportation costs, residential use of DRICON FRTW. Warranty Hickson Corporation proudly offers builders a 40 year warranty against heat degradation for DRICON FRTW in roof applications. This warranty provides for repair or replacement of a roof should DRICON FRTW struc- turally degrade due to heat and/or humidity exposure for up to 40 years. This warranty is non-prorated and requires only that roofs be built to the requirements of the building code having jurisdiction. Builders need only register with Hickson Corporation once and build by the terms of the warranty. Ask for your warranty specimen copy from your local supplier. 13 DRICON treatment does not substantially change the physical characteristics of ordinary lumber. You NOTE: should be aware of proper handling and personal This information applies solely to DRICON FRTW. Not all fire retar- hygiene practices, which are much the same as if dant treatec: wood meets the high quality standards of DRI- you were using untreated wood. Specifically ,,. CON FRTW, ]hey may require different handling practices and may exhibit other characteristics, 1, DRICON wood should not be installed where it will be exposed to precipitation, direct wetting, or reg- When used (~nd handled properly, in accordance with these recommendations, we believe you will receive many years of dar condensation, service from '/our DRICON FRTW. 2. DRICON wood should not be used in contact with the ground. 3. Normal carpentry practices are applicable. End culling, drilling, joining, and light surface sanding will not reduce the benefits of the DRICON treatment. Ripping and milling are not recommended since they may alter the burning characteristics and invalidate the Underwriters Laboratories flame spread classi- fication, All cuts on plywood are considered ~~'~:--~':;-'--" end cuts and are permitted, what You Sho~- 4. When storing DRICON FRTW, the material Fii'e :ardant should be kept off the ground and covered to shield it from precipitation. 5. When painting or staining, the paint or stain manufacturer's recommendations should be followed. As with untreated lumber, the surface should be clean and dry, ','~ 6. The same common sense precautions should be taken when handling DRICON FRTW as with untreated wood or other building materials, Dust masks and eye protection devices are recommended to avoid possible irritation from sawdust and wood chips. Gloves will help avoid splin- ters. Hands should be washed after doing construction work. Tips on the Use and Handling of 7. For more detailed information, consult the Dricon® FRTW DRICON FRTW booklets available from ~. ........ your supplier. 14 Fire Retardant Treated Wood The following literature is available upon request: Recognition Dricon fire retardant or Dricon FRT wood cam- Strength Properties data sheet (DRl-595) plies with or has been granted the following: · AWPA C20/C27 · AWPA P17 (FR-1) Specimen sample of the 40-year warranty (DRI-SP, WRT) · FR~S · NER-303 (BOCA, ICBO, SBCCI) · EPA registration (62190-9) National Evaluation DRICON FRTW ,~e~ur, on ~,~E,~-~u~) · UL Building Materials Directory * UL Recognized Component Tip Sheet (DR1-162) · NYC MEA 199-81-M * NYC MEA 200-81-M * Facto~ Mutual Class I Roof Deck Reference Guide for designing with fire retardant treated wood · City of Eos Angdes (RR 25122) (DRI-617) · FHA Minimum Prope~y Standard ~2600 * HUD Materials Release (1261) * California State Fire Marshal or see: Sweet's catalog, SweetSource~ ARCAT, Architects' First · state of wisconsin Source, Manu-Spec? Spec-Data? SpecDisk7 www.dricon.com · QPL (All are subject to revision, re-examination) .............................. Tests Dricon FRT wood has been tested in accordance with the following procedures: Know AbOUt Here :~ a ,.ar~ct fl~at:~ la~ely ~.Me~:~mS, a,~d ....... · ASTM D1413 * Boeing BSS 7239 ~eated WoOd i~ c.~ ~,, a ~n~dc to vo.r ~on~r~,c~m' sales. ~ ·· AsTMASTM D3345D3201 ** NFPAMIL-L-12~9140 ~* Termiticidal and ~~ · ASTM D5516 * NFPA 258 ~ ~.~.~ ~ w~ Fungicidal Prope~les ~ -~ * ASTM D5664 · NFPA 259 .~ '/ ~ * ASTME-84 * UL723 ~: For FR~ in Weather~ ~ * ASTM E-162 / ~~ ~.~ ~,~ v~ Shielded ~p~ications ' ~ i~ National Evaluation Se~ice,lnc. '~ /' ~ Reprinted f~m Cott&~ ~a~tageme~t - May 1995 t - ~ ~ ~'" , . CASE STUDY #1 CASE STUDY #2 crews who had to go up on the roof regularly to service heating units.' Project: Alice Birney Middle School Project: Rikers Island Prison The roof sheathing on Mark Line's Location: Charleston, South Carolina Dormitories six Rikers Island buildings was Constructed: 1981 Location: Rikers Island, New York replaced with DRICON FRT plywood. Problem Inspected: 1988 Constructed: 1987 Coates sums up by saying, "Now l Reference: Heat degradation prob- Problem Discovered: 1988 will not allow our company to use anything other than DRICON ply- lens related fo FRT wood products Reference: Prison official reported wood for FRT roof sheathing." prompted Hickson fo test condition roof leaks; heat degradation of plywood used in one of the first revealed. structures built with DRICON wood. Evaluation: DRICON FRT trusses Evaluation: undamaged; compefitor's FRT Strength vol- sheathing brittle, discolored and ues were deteriorating. more than Outcome: Dormitory roofs 100% seven times reconstructed with DRICON FRT pl~,'- stronger wood in summer of 1989. than APA design val- Background: "We had never even ues despite heard of heat degradation prob- a history of lems when a customer called to tell severe tern- us there was a problem with the perature roof on two dormitories we built in exposure. 1987,' recounts Kin Coates. The Breaking off of failed competitive ply- vice president of operations at Mark wood exposes undamaged DRICON Outcome: Line Industries, Inc., in Bristol, lumber below. Original ~,~ ~ ~, ~ ~ DRICON FRT ~ ~ - plywood still After nearly a decade, the in place at Alice Birney school was reexam- school. 'i CASE STUDY #3 ined, No evidence of heat degradation was found, despite Project: Northwoods Apartments severe temperatures caused by inadequate ventilation, Location: Charleston, South Carolina Constructed: 1984 -~ Problem Discovered: 1989 Background: "Strength tests were '~:~'.;'~'~ '~' ' Reference: Damage caused by performed on DRICON samples Hurricane Hugo revealed heat taken from the school's roof seven degradation in FRT sheathing. years after the school was con- Inspection by the contractor structed,' reports Scott Hoffman of The defective plywood could not support responsible for repairs found two dif- Hickson Corporation. "Ventilation in the weight of one man. Here it has ferent brands of FRT plywood prod- deflected a full inch under approximately the dark-shingled roofing structure 100 lbs. load. ucts had been used in original con- had been so poor the shingles had struction. curled and had to be replaced only Indiana, recalls, "Over a period of three years after construction. Yet several months, it was discovered even though the DRICON samples that the plywood we had installed had hundreds of nail holes in them in all six of the 10,000 square-foot and had been installed in a roofing modular buildings at Rikers Island structure with a history of inade- Prison was having the problem,' quote ventilation, they still had Although Mark Line had installed strength values more than seven DRICON trusses, another brand of times stronger than APA design vol- FRT plywood had been used for the ues. These results confirmed our project, "The plywood was losing its confidence in the structural integrity flexibility; it was becoming brittle. of DRICON plywood." And the customer was concerned about the safety of maintenance DRiCON and defective plywood shown side by side. The DRICON was clean and sturdy while the competitor's brand was 16 discolored and structurally weak, ,Fire Retardant Treated Wood Evaluation: DRICON Corporation continues to use DRI- FRT plywood undam- CON FRTW in roof construction with aged; the other FRT confidence. product showed seri- Background: As one of the nation's ous deterioration largest home builders, Pulte Home from heat degrada- Corporation had used FRTW prod- tion which had ucts in hundreds of developments occurred prior to the before learning about serious heat storm, degradation problems in some Outcome: All deteri- brands of FRT wood, When compa- orated plywood ny executives became aware of replaced with DRI- the problem they did not wait for CON plywood by courts to settle liability issues sur- the end of 1989. rounding the controversy. Instead, Background: The Pulte began an extensive investiga- winds of Hurricane tion to identify all projects in which Hugo devastated FRTW products had been used and much of the South Workmen could easily break the defective plywood with started researching options for the Carolina coast in their bare hands. September 1989. Among the damaged buildings was for comparing different FRT plywood Northwoods Apartments in products side by side. While another Charleston. A major portion of the product had suffered serious deteri- shingling had been blown off in the oration from heat degradation, the storm, and re-shingling of the entire DRICON FRT plywood, which still roofing was necessary, clearly displayed the DRICON ~. Raleigh, North Carolina-based stamp, was clean looking and Lancaster Construction was named bright, and it seemed to be as stur- general contractor for the dy as untreated plywood. Northwoods "It was evident that the DRICON restoration pro- plywood was holding up, and the ject. Lancaster other product was unsatisfactory," supervisor Phil explained Ellis, "so we replaced all Ellis recalls, the deteriorated plywood with DRI- "When we CON material." walked across the roofing to remove the old shingles, CASE STUDY tt4 ~, the sheathing just gave way. Project: Chattahoochee Terrace Like hundreds of homes inspected, the DRICON wood We found that Townhomes examined in this building showed no evidence of heat portions of ply- degradation. wood had rot- Location: Atlanta, Georgia ted out, even Constructed: 1984 replacement of all roofing structures though the Problem Inspected: 1990 affected. apartment Reference: In response to heat When company representatives buildings were ~~-~'~ only about five degradation problems, Pulte Home inspected numerous roofing struc- ----'~~ years old," Corporation examined perfor- tures from Florida to the Great ~,~ mance of FRTW products used in Lakes, they discovered DRICON ~ Upon hundreds of multi-family projects FRTW did not show a single instance inspection, along the Eastern Seaboard. of heat degradation reported Joel DRICON panel pulled from roof workers on the Hayes, Director of Construction. supports a person's full weight, project found a Evaluation: No project containing After months of thorough investiga- mix of fire retardant treated ply- DRICON FRTW materials showed evi- wood products had been used in dence of heat degradation, tion, Pulte Homes Corporation reaf- firmed its decision to use DRICON the original construction. The missing Outcome: Original DRICON wood FRTW as an effective way of replac- shingles provided a rare opportunity still in place; Pulte Home lng defective FRTW roof sheathing, 17 : '" www. dricon,com Make The Best 'mes Last A Li£etime When you're working ~.. ' I'low To Live The ~ on that special project- Good Life ~i from a playhouse for the kids Whether you're to a deck for the whole family entertaining, gardening, = -- there's no better wayto enjoying time with your build it than with Wolmanized® family or even building · . pressure-treated wood. or remodeling your Because no other wood gives home, you can count you mare years of enjoyment on Wolmanized wood and beauly, to help you live the .~ Wolmanized wood good life. Because, - is the pressure-treated wood Wolmanized wood not that's backed by a lifetime only promises a lifetime :~ limited warranty. So you get a of good memories, it lifetime of protection against also delivers the peace fungal decay and termites, of mind that goes with " And that means a lifetime of knowing you're doing pleasure from creating delight- your part to help the ful projects that last. environment. When you choose long-lasting Wolman- ized wood, you're investing in the conser- vation of one of our most precious natural resources. No other building material is more in balance with nature than Wolmanized pressure-treated wood. In fact, treated wood lasts for at least as long as it takes replace- ment lumber to be grown and harvested. Good Living At Its Natural Best Compared to many other ...... '~J types of building materials, lumber has always been an enviror~mentally sound choice. After all, wood is a renewable resource, and turning it into usable lumber requires less energy than producing alter- native materials, such as concrete for patios or metal and v!nyl for siding. That's why Wolmanized pressure-treated wood is the natural choice for virtually all your outdoor projects. Because Wolmanized wood resists term:~tes and fungi for a lifetime, you're helping one tree do the way to protect our fragile Wolmanized wood safely in work of many In fact, some environment. But, because virtually all .your outdoor pro- estimates say that, without . treated lumber is made fromjects, from picnic tables to pressure-treated wood, an plentiful species of trees, playground equipment. And additional 250 million trees grown primarily in managed the preservative is very resis- would be used annually timberlands-- trees like south- rant to leaching into the across North America to :ern pine, ponderosa pine- '''~:'~ ' surrounding environment, so replace decayed or termite- and hem-fir-- you're helping you can even useWolmaniz8d' infested wood products, preserve old-growth forests, wood in gardens, pet and · What's mare, Wolman- bird houses, and storage bins. Building A Better World ized wood is a safe building You might never have material that's been proven thought that building projects in more than 50 years of use of Wolmanized pressure- and product testing around treated wood is an excellent people, plants and pets. The wood preservative is fixed in the wo. odl so you can use Bu 'ld 'ng The Best 'mes Safely With Wolmanized wood at your fingertips, all you need is a little imagina- tion to discover endless possi- ; bilities. Whether you have a ; little space or a lot, you can create Wolmanized wood projects that give your home a special touch. When you choose Wolmanized wood, you get wood that's been pressure treated with a preservative, to assure you a lifetime of enjoyment from any project. But, you should take certain precautions when working with Wolmanized wood, just as when handling any type of wood. Before you begin your project, read through our Consumer Information Sheet, "The Best Way To Safety~' available fram your local build- -' ing supply ' or home center store. A WOlmanized Wood For Every Prol'ect No matter what kind of lumber, so it can be sawed, project you hove in mind, planed, drilled and nailed just there's a Wolmanized wood as you ordinarily would. that's just right for your appli- cation- and your lifestyle. Wolmanized®ExtraT~ Weather-Resistant With three choices that let you Lumber pick the wood grade and treatment level, it's easy to dis- With a water repellent cover the beauty of working driven deep into the wood with and living with this natu- under pressure, Wolmanized rally superior material. Extra lumber offers a built-in ~defense against cracking and WolmanJzed®Pressure. premature aging caused by Treated Wood rain, snow and drying sun. With Wolmanized So your projects stand up to pressure-treated wood, you long-term weather exposure get all the favorable proper- beautifully, with a minimum of ties of ordinary untreated h,visting, cupping and dimen- wood. Plus, you get long- sional changes. lasting protection against fungal decay and termites, in even the most severe land- scaping exposures. Best of all, Wolmanized wood has virtually all the same physical characteristics as untreated --v#i o]l v l:l llr#j/v#folo]J/BJlelolo]J/Io]:/lll Dream It- Bu 'ld It With Wolmanized wood, level of protection against ter- if you can dream it, you can mites and decay-causing fungi. build it. Thanks to the work- Wood treated with able nature of Wolmanized Wolman preservative can wood, most outdoor living extend the life of soffit and ideas are within easy reach facia boards, floors and walls of the do-it-yourselfer. Decks,in wet areas such as bath- gazebos, fences, shelters, play- rooms and kitchens, ground- houses, pet buses, planters level floor joists and even and much more let you take roofing shakes and shingles. advantage of this versatile And that means durable, material that's safe for people, long-lasting construction with plants and pets, when used fewer home repairs. as recommended. Today more than ever, But, these days, home- Wolmanized wood is the owners are finding even more answer for long-lasting enjoy- uses for this versatile wood-- ment in your home and for all a wood that's been protecting your outdoor projects. No outdoor projects for 50 years, other building material offers In fact, now you can give you more beauty, more versa- your entire home this same tility and more peace of mind. U.S. Borax Inc. 26877 Tourney Road Valencia, CA 91355-i~ / Dr. Jeff Lloyd ~twsc USA AG, EI~TI)A , Market Development Manager tel (1) 661 287 6075 fax (1) 661 287 6014 jeffJIoyd@borax.com 1. Introductions ,~ -. www. borax.corn 2. Purpose of Hazard Analysis 2o. a,tuz;~ ~-~4'-~. Regulations ~ ' '- Safety 3. Methodology What if/Checklist Broken into 6 subsets Borate - research and production -ACQ 4. Conduct of Hazard Analysis 5. Summation Potential hazards identified Mitigation measures Responsibilities ~ Experience capsules 0 tt PACIFIC WOOD BAKERSFIELD FACILITY WHAT IF/CHECKLIST FORM Analysis Team: Reese-Chambers, PWP, Borax, Bakersfield Fire Department Date of Analysis: Aug. 7, 2001 System Investigated: Copper/Borate Research Project Initial Mixing Process What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations ., Consequences Prevention Measures ~'i brum leaking at time '" of pickup? 21 Drum leaks during transport by truck? 3. Wrong product is delivered? 4. Drop pallet during offioading? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 5. Drum develops leak during storage on site? 6. Vehicle/equipment runs into drum while in storage? 7. Drum gets too hot? 8.' Drum gets too cold? 9. Pallet/drum is dropped/damaged during transport to platform? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 10. Drum falls off platform? 11. Mistake made during insertion of pump? 12. Make mistake during pumping/siphoning? 13. Mixing tank has other product in it? 14. Mixing tank develops leak? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 15. Too much vapor comes off mixing tank? 16. Too much copper carbonate added resulting in energetic CO= release? 17. Mixing attendant becomes incapacitated? 18. Overfill mixing tank? 19. Mixing tank becomes contaminated (bad mixture)? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations - Consequences Prevention Measures 20. Mixing tank becomes overheated? 21. Mixing tank becomes overpressurized? 22. Transfer piping leaks (valve, hole, corrosion)? 23. Transfer piping routed to wrong tank/location? 24. Transfer pump doesn't work? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing ControlS/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 25. Work tank not empty (first time filling)? 26. Work tanI~ has other product in it? 27. Work tank leaks (valve, hole)? 28. Overfill work tank? 29. Work tank becomes overheated? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 30. Work tank becomes overpressurized? 31. Major earthquake? 32. There is a power failure? 33. There is a compressed air failure? .~ 34. There is a hydraulic failure? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 3~. There is an instrumentation or control room failure? PACIFIC WOOD BAKERSFIELD FACILITY WHAT IF/CHECKLIST FORM Analysis Team: Reese-Chambers, PWP, Borax, Bakersfield Fire Department Date of Analysis: Aug. 7, 2001 System Investigated: Treatment Process Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations What-if? Likelihood Consequences' Prevention Measures 1. Leak in piping between work tank and treatment cylinder? 2. Pump fails? 3. Piping routed to wrong location? 4. Vehicle/equipment runs into piping? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 5. Treatment cylinder leaks (door not closed, hole in cylinder, gasket leak)? 6. Vacuum not drawn in treatment cylinder? 7. Door opened while under vacuum? 8. Door opened while under pressure (after solution pumped in)? 9. Treatment cylinder overpresurrized? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 10. Treatment cylinder overheats? 11. Transfer pump does not work when sending product back to work ~ tank? 12. Overfill work tank when pumping from treatment cylinder? 13. Major rain storm (impact on sump area below treatment cylinder)? 14. Overfill work tank pumping from sump? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 15. There is a power failure? 16. There is a compressed air failure? 17. There is a hydraulic failure? 18. There is an instrumentation or control room failure? PACIFIC WOOD BAKERSFIELD FACILITY WHAT IF/CHECKLIST FORM Analysis Team: Reese-Chambers, PWP, Borax, Bakersfield Fire Department Date of Analysis: Aug. 7, 2001 System Investigated: Copper/Borate Commercial Mixing Process - IBC Delivery What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 1. IBC leaking when delivered? 2. Wrong product is delivered? 3. Drop IBC during offioading? 4. IBC develops leak during storage on site? 'What-if? ~ Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 5. Vehicle/equipment runs into drum while in storage? 6. IBC gets too h'ot? 7. IBC gets too cold? 8. IBC is dropped/damaged during transport to platform? 9. IBC falls off platform? Potential Existing Controls/ What-if? Likelihood Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 10~ Mistake made during transfer to mixing tank? PACIFIC WOOD BAKERSFIELD FACILITY WHAT IF/CHECKLIST FORM Analysis Team: Reese-Chambers, PWP, Borax, Bakersfield Fire Department Date of Analysis: Aug. 7, 2001 System Investigated: Copper/Borate Commercial Mixing Process - Tank Truck Delivery What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 1. Tank truck leaking when arrives? 2. Wrong product is delivered? 3. Leak in transfer hose? 4. Storage tank develops leak?? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 5. Storage tank has other product in it?? 6. Overfill storage tank? 7. Storage tank becomes overheated? 8. Storage tank becomes overpressurized? 9. Transfer piping leaks? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 10. Transfer piping routed to wrong tank/location? 11. Transfer pump doesn't work? 12. Major earthquake? 13. Power failure? 14. Compressed air failure? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 15. Hydraulic failure? 16. Instrumentation or control room failur? PACIFIC WOOD BAKERSFIELD FACILITY WHAT IF/CHECKLIST FORM Analysis Team: Reese-Chambers, PWP, Borax, Bakersfield Fire Department Date of Analysis: Aug. 7, 2001 System Investigated: ACQ Process What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 1. Tank truck leaking when arrives? 2~ Wi-ong product-iS ................... . delivered? 3. Leak in transfer hose? 4. Storage tank develops leak? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 5. Storage tank has other product in it? 6. Overfill storage tank? 7. Storage tank becomes overheated? 8. Storage tank becomes overpressurized? 9. Transfer piping leaks? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Consequences Prevention Measures Recommendations 10. Transfer piping routed to wrong tank/location? 11. Transfer pump doesn't work? 12. Major earthquake? 13. Power failure? 14. Compressed air failure? What-if? Likelihood Potential Existing Controls/ Recommendations Consequences Prevention Measures 15. Hydraulic failure? 16. Instrumentation or control room failure? Pacific Wood Preserving Aerial Site Location Map 0.3 0 0.3 0.6 Miles Aerial Photo showing relative proximity of residential neighborhoods to the Stockdale Industrial Park complex Secretary of State's Office - Co, ration Search Results Page 1 of 1 BusiNEss ~!: ~ ~ . . SERY~cE ~ . (:;N~EII Disclaimer: The information displayed here is current as of "07121/2001" and is u · weekly. It is not a complete or certified record of the Corporation. FAQS Search Tip~ Corporation Field Definitions PACIFIC WOOD CONTAINERS, lNG. Status Definitions Corporations Number= C129188511Date Filed: 11/16/108511Status= active Corporate Records Corporate Records Order Jurisdiction: California Form Certificates Mailing Address Copies Status Printouts 5601 DISTRICT BLVD. New Searc_hh BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Agent for Service of Process RONALD G LAUGHLIN 5601 DISTRICT BLVD. BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 New Search · For information about certification of corporate records or for additional corpora information, please refer to Corporate Records. · Blank fields indicate the information is not contained in the computer file. · If the status of the corporation is "Surrender", the agent for service of process is automatically revoked. Please refer to California Corporations Code Section 21 information relating to service upon corporations that have surrendered. Copyright ©2000 California Secretary of State. Pdvacy Statement http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdataJShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C 1291885 7/26/01 ~ CCA Pressure Treated d Arsenic Page I of 4 Arsenic and Will CCA wood become the next aSbestos crisis? Is Arsenic in pressure-treated wood contaminating your own backyard? What is CCA pressure Treated Wood? CCA pressure treated wood is the green-tinged lumber sold in almost every home center and lumberyard in America. It has the indisputable benefit of being highly resistant to rot and insects. The lumber is treated with a pressurized solution containing Copper, Chromates and Arsenic, hence the name CCA lumber. It is sometimes sold under the brand name "Wolmanized" Lumber. Click here to read more about Arsenic treatment of CCA lumber. How is arsenic released? CCA pressure-treated wood contains arsenic which can be released from the wood in several ways: · When the wood burned · Mechanical abrasion · Direct contact · When acid contacts the treated lumber. Burning:It is incredible, but a single 12 foot 2 x 6 contains about 27 grams of Arsenic - enough arsenic to kill 250 adults. Burning CCA wood releases the chemical bond holding Arsenic in the wood, and just one Tablespoon of ash from a CCA wood fire contains a lethal dose of Arsenic. Worse yet, Arsenic gives no warning: it does not have a specific taste or odor to warn you of its presence. No one disputes that the ash from burning CCA wood is highly toxic: It is illegal to burn CCA wood in all 50 states. This has serious implications for firefighters, cleanup and landfill operations. htt~) ://vcww.orieenbio.com/arsenic.html 6/19/2001 CCA Pressure Treated Woo( Arsenic Page 2 of 4 Mechanical abrasion: CCA wood particles are released when the wood is sawed, sanded 'or shaped. So far, no studies have been done on these effects, but the warning card stapled to each bundle of CCA wood warns about avoiding sawdust. Direct Contact: In a study conducted by the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, the authors found that arsenic is released to the child's hand by direct contact with arsenic- treated wood. The amount ingested per day was estimated to be about 7 micrograms per day. This should be compared against an estimated 5 micrograms estimated in food and 5 to 100 micrograms (ppb) in drinking water. Acid release: The same Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station study found an average Arsenic concentration of 76 ppm under old CCA treated decks. The range was from 3 to 350 ppm, and the state limit is 10 ppm. It is suspected that acid rain and acidic deck washes can hasten release of arsenic from the wood. How does arsenic affect me? Back to you: The concern is that released arsenic can find its way into our bodies, the food chain and groundwater. Will arsenic in CCA ash leech out of landfills into water supplies? No one knows. Arsenic can be absorbed through the skin, inhaled or ingested. One-tenth of a gram accumulated over a two month period can produce death, and arsenic is carcinogenic at much lower levels. The EPA limit in water is currently 50 ppb, and proposals to lower it to 2 ppb are in place. Besides release of arsenic, another concern is the release of Arsine gas. Arsine gas has been used as a nerve gas, and is made by reacting zinc and arsenic in the presence of an acid. Building a deck using galvanized nails in an area of acid rain could theoretically cause this reaction, although the volume of Arsine gas would be expected to be Iow. Storing CCA wood ash in a galvanized bucket may be asking for trouble, however. Click on these to read more about Arsenic toxicity, CCA wood in gardens, Signs of Arsenic poisoning, Arsenic poisoning treatment, and the Dangers of CCA Ash. How much should I be concerned? More than a little. Besides the extreme toxicity of CCA ash, newer studies have shown that arsenic can be rubbed off by contact with CCA wood and leech out of CCA wood in significant amounts. What precautions can I take? Fortunately, several are effective. him ://wwu; .ori {,~enbio.com/arsenic .html 6/19/2001 ' CCA Pressure Treated Wood cl Arsenic Page 3 of 4 Use a pressure treated wood which does not contain arsenic: Several pressure treated wood formulations which do not contain arsenic are available right now. Your lumberyard may carry these under the trade names of "ACQ" or "Kodiak Wood", or they may be listed as preserved with ACQ (Ammoniacial Copper Quaternary), copper azole and/or copper citrate. All are arsenic-free and effective against rot and insects: the US EPA says they are safe, and the American Wood Preservers Association says they work. If your lumberyard does not stock these, they can order them. You might be interested to know that these are the wood- preservation formulas used in Japan and Europe, where CCA treated wood is banned. Seal existing construction: If you already have a CCA wood structure, seal it every two years with a waterproof sealant, paint or stain. Do NOT use acid deck wash or brighteners as these have been suspected to accelerate release of arsenic from CCA wood. Sealing your deck can reduce arsenic leeching by 90% (reference). Never burn CCA wood! The ash is so highly toxic that a family who used CCA wood to heat their house had blackouts, grand mai seizures, their hair fell out and their plants and fish died (report in the Journal of the American Medical Association). Read more about CCA ash effects on humans and animals. At this point, CCA wood can only be disposed of in special land fills. Check with your local waste agency for precautions and regulations. Let's all hope that arsenic in the wood stays in place as it decomposes. Take precautions when cleaning up after a CCA wood fire If you have a fire of a CCA wood structure, like a deck or gazebo, you MUST treat the ash as toxic, because it is. Again, ingestion, inhalation or absorption through the skin of 1 Tablespoon of this ash can be lethal to an adult. Wear a respirator rated for asbestos dust, and fully cover all exposed skin including hands and face. Disposable Tyvek suits are available through most Industrial supply companies like Granger, McMaster, etc. have your clothing rinsed down before disrobing. New construction: Don't add arsenic to your backyard. In particular, plants can take up arsenic from the soils, so it may not be a good idea to use CCA wood in gardens. Se the paragraph above on arsenic-free alternatives. Make your local lumberyard aware of the dangers of arsenic. What can I do? The only reason that CCA wood is still used is economics: it is 5 to 10% cheaper than other wood treatments. Using this logic, it would be sound practice to use asbestos as an insulation material in schools because it's really cheap at the moment. Contact your local elected representative about the unnecessary dangers of living with arsenic in your backyard. Propose tariffs, taxes or a levy on CCA lumber. The added expense will make the safer treatments more widely available, and provide a handy financial resource for what could become the biggest cleanup operation in history. Write your state or Federal Environmental agency make them aware of the dangers of arsenic in CCA wood, and tell them we the risk outweighs the benefit since safer alternatives are available. hur~://www.orieenbio.com/arsenic.html 6/19/2001 ,? · ' · CCA Pressure Treated d Arsenic Page 4 of 4 Get an arsenic test of your soil. Do you have Small children who may play under the deck? Concerned about a house with an old deck that you are looking at? Do you live in an area of Acid Rain (which may leech arsenic out of CCA Wood)? Get an arsenic test of the soil under the deck. Here is a list of some Testing Labs. Look into Arsenic Abatement. Here is a'~ink to sites that claim to specialize in Arsenic Removal, mostly for water treatment. ~~4~r~:~!':~~:: ~:¢>~:i5::~'~: ~:'~:'~::!::~:¢~'t~:?.~:: ~ ::~:~:,:i:,.~..,..~::: ,,~,~,dd,~< Links Links Here is a page of links to other sites on CCA lumber, including a link to the WoOd treatment industry page. It is our intention to have this a completely factual forum for the discussion of the risks and benefits of CCA and other pressure treated woods. If you would like to contribute, correct errors, have an idea, gripe, link or comment, contact me, Richard Martin. I want to make this a balanced public forum, and as factual as possible. I would be happy to add your comments or counterpoint to our comment page. Liability: This site is intended as a discussion site only to present only factual information about arsenic and its effects on the environment. This site is not intended to either promote or denigrate any product over any another. The Author assumes no liability beyond the liability to correct material facts in error. Origen Biomedical 2525 Hartford Rd. Austin, Texas USA 78703 Page updated: Feb 2001 ~ . There have been visitors since August 1999. Copyright ) 2001, OriGen, Inc. All rights reserved. Page hosted by OriGen Networks as a public information service. ,, htm://www, orieenbio.com/arsenic.htn~l 6/19/2001 Page 1 of 184 [Federal Register: June 22, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 121)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 38887-38983] From the Federal Re~ister Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID: fr22jn00-30] [[Page 38887]] Part II Environmental Protection Agency. ....................................................................... 40 CFR Parts 141 and 142 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring; Proposed Rule [[Page 38888]] ....................................................................... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 141.and 142 [WI{-FRL-6707-2] RIN 2040-AB75 National. Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ....................................................................... SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a drinking water regulation, for arsenic, as required by the 1996 .amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The proposed health- based, non-enforceable goal, or Maximum Contaminant Level Goal(MCLG), for arsenic is zero, and the proposed enforceable standard, or maximum contaminant level (MCL), for arsenic is 0.005 mg/L. EPA is also requesting comment on 0.003 mg/L, 0.010 mg/L and 0.020 mg/L for the MCL. EPA is listing technologies that will meet the MCL, including affordable compliance technologies for three categories of small systems serving less than 10,000 people. This proposal also includes monitoring, reporting, public notification, and consumer confidence report requirements and State primacy revisions for public drinking water programs affected by the arsenic regulation. In addition, in this proposal the Agency is clarifying compliance for State-determined monitoring after exceedances for inorganic, volatile organic, and synthetic organic contaminants. Finally, EPA is proposing that States will specify the time period and sampling frequency for new public water systems and systems using a new source http://www, epa.gov/safewater/ars/arsenic.txt 06/25/2001 Page 2 of 184 of water to demonstrate compliance with the MCLs. The requirement for new systems and new source monitoring will be effective for inorganic, volatile organic, and synthetic organic contaminants. DATES: EPA must receive public comments, in writing, on the proposed regulations by September 20, 2000. EPA will hold a public meeting on this proposed regulation this summer, EPA will publish a notice of the meeting, providing date and location, in the Federal Register, as well as post it on EPA's Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water web site at http://www.epa.gov/safewater. ADDRESSES: You may send written comments to the W-99-16 Arsenic Comments Clerk, Water Docket (MC-4101); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460. Comments may be hand-delivered to the Water Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 401 M Street, SW; EB-57; Washington, DC 20460; (202).260-3027 between 9 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. Comments may be submitted electronically to ow-docket@epamail.epa.gov. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file formats and other information about electronic filing and docket review. The proposed rule and supporting documents, including public comments, are available for review in the Water Docket at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regulatory information: Irene Dooley, (202) 260-9531, email: dooley.irene@epa.gov. Benefits: Dr. John B. Bennett, (202) 260-0446, email: bennett.johrib@epa.gov General information about the regulation: Safe Drinking Water Hotline, phone: (800) '426-4791, or (703) 285-1093, email: hotline.sdwa@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulated Entities A public water system, as defined in 40 CFR 141.2, provides water to the public for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances, if such system has ''at least fifteen service connections or regularly serves an average of at least twenty-'five individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year.'' A public water system is either a community water system (CWS) or a non-community water system (NCWS). A community water system, as defined in Sec. 141.2, is ''a public water system which serves at least fifteen service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least twenty-five year-round residents.'' The definition in Sec. 141.2 for.a non- transient, non-community water system [NTNCWS] is ''a public water system that is not a [CWS] and that regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons over 6 months per year.'' EPA has .an inventory totaling over 54,000 community water systems and approximately 20,000 non- transient, non-community water systems nationwide. Entities potentially regulated by this action are community water systems and non-transient, non-community water systems. The following table provides examples of the regulated entities under this rule. Table of Regulated Entities Examples of potentially regulated Category entities Industry ..................... Privately owned/operated community water supply systems using ground water or mixed ground water and surface water. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/arsenic.txt 06/25/2001 Page 3 of 184 State, Tribal, and Local State, Tribal, or local government-owned/ Government. operated water supply systems using ground water or mixed ground water and surface water. Federal Government ........... Federally owned/operated community water supply systems using ground water or mixed ground water and surface water. The table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware ' could potentially be regulated by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this table could also be regulated. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability criteria in Secs. 141.11 and 141.62 of the rule. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult Irene Dooley, the regulatory information person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Additional Information for Commenters Please submit an original and three copies of your comments and enclosures (including references). To ensure that EPA can read, understand., and therefore properly respond to comments, the Agency. would prefer that comments cite, where possible, the paragraph(s) or sections in the notice or supporting documents to which each comment refers. Commenters should use a separate paragraph for each issue discussed. Electronic comments must be submitted as a WordPerfect 5.1, WP6.1 [[Page 38889]] or WP8 file or as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters. Comments and data will also be accepted on disks in WP5.1, WP6.1 or WP8, or ASCII file format. Electronic comments on this Notice may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. Commenters who want' EPA to acknowledge receipt of their comments should include a self- addressed, stamped envelope. No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted. Availability of Docket' The docket for this rulemaking has been established under number W- 99-16, and includes supporting documentation as well as printed, paper versions of electronic comments. The docket is available for inspection from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, at the Water Docket; EB 57; U.S. EPA; 401 M Street, SW; Washington, D.C. For access to docket materials, please call (202) 260-3027 to schedule an appointment. Abbreviations Used in This Proposed Rule >--greater than <gr-thn-eq>--greater than or equal to --less than <ls-thn-eq>--less than or equal to Sec. --Section ACWA--Association of California Water Agencies AA--activated alumina As (III)--trivalent arsenic. Common inorganic form in water is arsenite h~p://www, epa.gov/sa~wateffars/arsenic.txt 06/25/2001 Secretary of State's Office - )oration Search Results Page 1 of 1 BUSINEss ~ ' SERYICE ' CENTER : ', Disclaimer: The information displayed here is current as of "07/21/2001" and is u weekly. It is not a complete or certified record of the Corporation. FAQS Search TIpA Corporation Field Definitions PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING OF BAKERSFIELD, INC. Status Definitions Corporations Number: C 10022061 Date Filed: 9/12/1980 I Status: active Corporate Records I I Corporate Records Order Jurisdiction: NEVADA Form Certificates Mailing Address Copies Status Printouts 5601 DISTRICT BLVD New Search I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Agent for Service of Process RONALD G LAUGHLIN 5601 DISTRICT BLVD BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 New Search For information about certification of corporate records or for additional corpora information, please refer to Corporate Records. Blank fields indicate the information is not contained in the computer file. If the status of the corporation is "Surrender", the agent for service of process is automatically revoked. Please refer to California Corporations Code Section 21 information relating to service upon corporations that have surrendered. Copyright ©2000 California Secretary of State. Privacy Statement http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C 1002206 7/26/01 07/25/2001 10:01 FAX i 888 803 7688 PAC ~¥001) INCLINE [~001 .d THE PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING COMPANIES FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: ~KOM: Howard Wines III ElainaJackson COMPANY: DATE~ Bakersfield Fire Dqx. 7/25/2001 FAX IqUM'BER'. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES rNCLUDI2N'G CO'VEi~,: 661-326-0576 2 PHONE NUMBER: $ENDER'S PHONE NUMBF,[~: 707-24%8797 RE: SENDER'S FAX NUMBER: Attached letter 888-803-7688 [] URGENT ~' FOR KEVt E\V [] PLEASE H.A.NDLZ [] PLEASE REPLY [] PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS; Please find the atm~ecl letter and enclosures. If You have any questions, please call me at 707-249-8797. Th,mkyou, Elaina Jackson 419 MEADOW VIEW DR., VACAVILLE, CA 95688. 316 SKI WAY, INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451 07/25/2001 10:01 FAX 1 888 803 7688 PAC WOOD INCLINE ~002 PI~ E,.q E I~.Vl N ~ I~ 13 M PAN I E,._q 5601 District Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93313 - ph: 681-833-0429 - Fax 661-836-0766 Emeil: information~_~pacil'icwood.corn · web: www. pae ficwoed.corn July 25, 2001 Howard Wines Ill Bakersfield Fire Dcp~ment Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave. Sre 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 VIA FACSIMILE (661-326-0576) AND THEN FIRST CLASS MAIL SUBJECT: PIPELI~rE CLOSURE Dear Mr. Wines: I am taking this opp0rrunity to update you regarding the status of the former creosote standpipe and delivery pipeline that was discussed with you by Dr. Leu on July 12, 2001. Dr. Leu has been retained to assess our facility from an environmental perspective and to assist us in addressing ,any issues of potential concern. I understand that one of the potential issues that he discussed with you was the closure of the former creosote standpipe and delivery pipeline. Prior to his meeting with you, Dr. Leu had discussed the status of The standpipe and delivery pipeline with selected sr0.ff of at our Bakersfield facillr7. These staff members were under the impression that the standpipe and delivery pipeline were not in use and had not been in use since the time we had stopped using creosote to treat wood products (approximately 4 to 5 years ago). However, discussions that I have had with the operational staff of this facility have confirmed that thc standpipe and pipeline arc being used to convey ACQ, an environmental friendly wood treatment chemical, to storage tanks. ~ffe switched ro using ACQ as a wood treatment chemical shortly ,after we stopped using creosote. Because this standpipe and dcli,:ery pipeline is in active service, we do not see a need to cease their use and close them. You should be aware that we have just completed a pressure test. of the standpipe and pipeline and found that they showed no leakage. Also, as you are aware, the delivery pipe is contained within a second pipe that acrs as secondary containment. Because we are nor aware of any spills or leaks of elrher creosote or ACQ from the use of the standpipe and the delivery pipeline and because these units we still in service, we will not be closing ,hem. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact myself or Mr. Ron Saylor, Environmental and Safety Manager at (661) 833-0429. Sincerely, Elaine Jackson Chief Operating Officer Pacific Wood Preserving Companies 5601 D[stdct Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661 -g33-O42g - F~ 661-$36-0766 RO. Box 968, El~, ~ 85231- Ph: 520-466-7801 - F~: 520-466.3607 ~0. B~ 3~0./egg~, TX 77350 - Ph: 409-398-574S · F~: 409-398-5864 R0. Box 350. Silve~ Springs, NV 69429 · Ph: 775-577q000 · F~: 775-577-3045 229B5 So~b Ave., CornJJ~g, ~ 96021 - Phone 530.824-8400 B A K E R S 'F I E L D FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 2001 TO: Ron Fraze, Fire Chief FROM: Ralph E. Huey, Director of Environmental Services~ ., SUBJECT: Inspection of Pacific Wood Preserving Per our discussion, we completed an inspection at Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield (P.W.P.) Located at 5601 District Blvd., on Tuesday, June 26 2001. Specifically, this inspection was designed to' determine ifP.W.P, has any creosote on site or is usi0g creosote as part of their wood preserving process as well as obtaining air sample reading on site, and the property "' perimeter. " A review of our files indicates that creOsote was eliminated 'at this facility four years ago.. The ...~ current wood treatment consist of: · "" a. Wolmanac Treatment (a chrome arsenic, copper solution). b. Borate/Boric Acid solution. c. Drycon (a fire retardant solution). We found no evidence of creosote on site or any creosote-treated wood.' According to Mr. Saylor, the Environmental Safety'Manager, the current trend for wood preserving is Borate Treatment which is equally harmful to pestsbut much more environmentally safe. Currently, P.W.P. treats nearly 50 percent of their wood with Borate process; and the remaining 50 percent split between Wolmanac and the fire retardant process. Air samples were taken with a photo ionization detector (P.I.D.) Which' is a non-specific but sensitive field detection instrument. The ionization potential (electron volts) of the probe used will pick up any of the creosote components, as well as most other hydrocarbon contaminants. The sensitivity of the instrument is capable of detecting parts per million. The following results were obtained: Memo to Fire Chief Ron Fraze Page 2 Subject: Inspection of Pacific Wood Preserving Sample # Date Time Location ~ 1 06/26/01 0915 Entry Gate Perimeter 0.0 2 06/26/01 0920 CCA Treated Lumber Drip Pad 0.1 3 06/26/01 0925 IC Engine Portable Air Compressor 0.4 4 06/26/01 0930 Drycon Borate Treatment Unit 0.1 5 06/26/01 0935 Drycon Treated Lumber Storage 0.1 6 06/26/01 0940 Hazardous Waste Drum Storage 0.0 7 06/26/01 0945 Repair Shop (Interior of Sea Train) 0.5 8 06/26/01 0950 Repair Shop (Exterior of Sea Train) 0.0 9 06/26/01 0955 CCA Tank Farm 0.0 10 06/26/01 1000 CCA Cylinder Pit 0.0 Based on the inspection and air samples analyzed, it does not appear that P.W.P. is a likely candidate for "creosote type" odors, or airborne contaminants related to creosote. This is further emphasized by the fact that the predominant air flow (winds) in this area are from the northwest. Pacific Wood Preserving is located approximately 3/4 of a mile southeast of the neighborhood that appears to be the source of the complaint. RH/db cc: K. Blair, Deputy Chief H. Wines, Hazardous Materials Specialist s:klune 200 l~n,~mo to RFraze re Inspection of Paci~ Wood P~se~ving,wpd 0 07/19/2001 Tt{U 08:44 FAX ~]001/003 PR ECS ~I~VINI3 r' CIMPANI g~ __1 I II I al II I I II I I ,5601 Cr~r~ Blvd., Bakersfield, CA, 9:~13 - Ph: r:~1-,833~:)429 * Fa~661~7~ ~ ~a,: ~U~~.~ * Web: ~,~~m T~ HOWARD WINES III Fm.: -' Fa~ 661-326-0576 I~ i~ Dat: Re: CC: C] Urgent ~ I'1 Fo~ Real(mar I-1 F'lease Ca~ameftt [] Please Rel~ !~ ~ Rec~fe 07/19/2001 THU 08:38 FAX ~002/003 560~ DistriCt Blvd. Bakemtleld, CA 93313 · Pm 661-~3-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 Emeil; information~pec~c~od.com - web: ~.pac[flcwood.~m FOR LMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ron Laughlin 661 :.833.0429 WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY STRONGLY DISPUTES KERO TELEVISION 23 REPORT July 18, 2001. Bakersfield, CA_ Officials from Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield, Inc. (Pacific) today disputed inferences in a KERO Channel 23 news report linking their plmat on District Boulevard to illnesses reported on Hampton Court in SOUthwest Bakersfield, "We share KERO's concern about the reported illnesses in our community", said Chief Operating Officer Elaina Jackson, "however, we believe that it is entirely inappropriate for the station mad its reporters to suggest a link between the illnesses and our Company. There is no evidence to support the television station's decision to infi~r to its viewers a link to Pacific -- no water well data, no drinking water data, no air monitoring data~ no hydrologic data. Nothing." KERO Television met with and interviewed Pacific for this story late last week. At that time the Company provided information about its environmental health and safety programs and compliance as well as water weI1 monitoring data. A review of drinking water records for the wells identified in the KERO report covering the last 21 years.show that the water serving southwest Bakersfield is safe to drink. Water sample results taken from wells nearest to Pacific's property as recently as Iune of this year'show that the water is clean and safe to drink, exceeding stringent federal and state drinking water standards, including tests for chromium, arsenic and creosote compounds, the very chemicals noted in the news report_ Tuesday night KERO Television reported in a series entitled, "Dying for Answers", that illnesses in the community date back more than 30 years, some 8 years before Pacific purchased its present location and began its operations. "This fact alone raises some \ serious questions about KERO's credibility in reporting this matter", Jackson added. "What makes this television report so difficult for us is that we work hard every day to ensure compliance with all pertinent health and safety regulations. We are considered leader m our industry and are proud of the effo~s we make to mmarmze our tmpacts or[~,,,:,.; .... environment and the commumty PaclfiC ts one of the most successful treating,plants m country to convert its production over to low environmental impact, low toxici~ wood,(,,,,.!!',~,i?~,~',,, .,:,,,,;,,,,, oreservatlves . ,', ........ ,,: ,~, , ,",,, ,,,, ,,', ,,,' ....... 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, r.A 9.~31 ~, Ph: 661-833-0429 - Faa 661-836-0766 , ' ', ' '"" : ~ ' , ' ,, P,O, [',ox ~0, I.e~gelt, TIt 777,.~D o Ph: 40fl-g.qg-574.~ · Fax: 409-]58-5564 ...... 22985 5curb gve..'Cornin9. r,A 96021 - Phone 530.824.8400 , ., ,, 07/19/2001 THU 08:39 FAX ~003/003 Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield, Inc. 7-18-2001 Page Two "Moreover, we have not received any complaints from any residential neighbors in more than five years", Jackson added. "As proof of our commitment to this community, over four years ago we responded to complaints about odors by voluntarily phasing out the use of creosote wood treatment at our Bakersfield plato. Any present odors detected by the residents &Hampton Court can not be attributed to our operations." In 1987 Pacific experienced an accidental release that was immediately.cleaned up under the supervision and to the satisfaction of the Kern County Environmental Health Department. In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepared a report on Pacific also concluding that Pacific posed no tin'eat to public health, safety or the environment and that no further action was necessary. Pacific is located in a commercial and industrial area along District Boulevard where there are many different business operations. "We are disappointed that KERO chose to impugn our Company and our many hard working employees and we question why KERO has not reported on other possible sources of contamination as part of their story", Jackson said. "We are concerned about any report of illnesses. We ourselves are a part of this community and have 31 employees with families in the immediate area. However, it is the proper responsibility of Kern County and others to investigate reported illnesses, to determine their origin and what steps, if any, are necessary to address the problem." Jackson said. THE David J. Leu, Ph.D. LEU President GROUP 33725 Magellan Isle, Suite 100k. 0__,I/-' . Monarch Beach, CA 92629 - ""'""' Telephone: (949) 248-5873 Fax: (949) 248-8785 '.' Cell: (949) 357-0006 email: daveleu@home.com AGENDA Pacific Wood Preserving of Bakersfield, Inc. Review of Operations - Risk Management Plan Requirements City of Bakersfield Fire Department July 24, 2001 IntroductiOns · Ron Saylor, Environmental Health & Safety Manager (661-833-0429) · Ev Ashworth, ALG (805-370-1469) · Tim Chambers, Reese Chambers (805-386-4343) Facility Description · Wood preservative and fire retardant pressure treating operations - Wolmanac (CCA) - Preserve (ACQ) - Borate (Timbor) - New Fixed Borates Research process · Prepared RMP for creosote operations, which were discontinued four years ago Use of Ammonia · ACQ process (8-15% maximum ammonia concentration) - ACQ-C1 is shipped by 46,000 pound capacity trucks - Stored in 19,000 gallon Containers, ammonia hydroxide concentration range from 8-15% - Mixed with other components (ACQ-C2 and Q-50) into 36,000 gallon storage tank, concentrations of ammonia in working solution range fi.om 2-4% - Solution is pumped imo treatment cylinder (120'by 7) for used in pressure treatment - Residual solution is recycled back to working solution storage tank · New Fixed Borate Treatment Process i - If successful, will replace use of CCA i' - R&D project to start as soon as possible - Proposed process, which is still under development, will entail · Ammonia hydroxide (aqueous) is shipped in 55-gallon containers, concentration to range from 19-28% and stored onsite prior to use · Mixed with other components (proprietary process) into 36,000 gallon storage tank, concentrations of ammonia in working solution range from 8-14% · New Fixed Borate Treatment Process (Cont.) · Solution is pumped into treatment cylinder (120'by 7) for used in pressure treatment · Residual solution is recycled back to working solution storage tank Review of RMP Requirements · Operations do not trigger Federal RMP requirements, as less that 20,000 pounds of ammonia hydroxide will be onsite at concentrations >2.0% · Operations do not trigger OSHA PSM requirements, as less that 10,000 pounds of ammonia hydroxide will be in any process at any time · ACQ and R&D project require RMP under California program as more than 1,000 pounds of ammonia hydroxide in concentrations > 1% will be onsite · RMP will address both existing (ACQ) and R&D/production of new fixed borates process (Tier 1 versus Tier II) - o~ c,~J,~ · Will commence R&D process upon submittal of RMP, and securing all SJVUAPCD approvals Discussion ' Next Steps PI~E~ EI~VI N (~ P- I-IM PAN I ES 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 Emaih information@pacificwood.com · Web: www. pacificwood.com July 25, 2001 Howard Wines 111 Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave. Ste 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 VIA FACSIMILE (661-326-0576) AND THEN FIRST CLASS MAIL SUBJECT: PIPELINE CLOSURE ....... Dear Mr~-W-in es .'~ ........ I am taking this opportunity to update you regarding the status of the former creosote standpipe and delivery pipeline that was discussed with you by Dr. Leu on July 12, 2001. Dr. Leu has been retained to assess our facility from an environmental perspective and to assist us in addressing any issues of potential concern. I understand that one of the potential issues that he discussed with you was the closure of the former creosote standpipe and delivery pipeline. Prior to his meeting with you, Dr. Leu had discussed the status of the standpipe and delivery pipeline with selected staff of at our Bakersfield facility. These staff members were under the impression that the standpipe and delivery pipeline were not in use and had not been in use since the time we had stopped usiiig creo'~bt'e!to treat wood pr0d~ts (approximately 4 to 5 years ago). However, discussions that I have had With'i't~e operational staff of this facility have confirmed that the standpipe and pipeline are being Used to'konvey ACQ, an environmental friendly wood treatment chemical, to storage tanks. We switched to using ACQ as a wood treatment chemical shortly after we stopped using creosote. Because this standpipe and delivery pipeline is in active service, we do not see a need to cease their use and close them. You should be aware that we have just completed a pressure test of the standpipe and pipeline and found that they showed no leakage. Also, as you are aware, the delivery pipe is contained within a second pipe that acts as secondary containment. Because we are not aware of any spills or leaks of either creosote or ACQ from the use of the standpipe and the delivery pipeline and because these units are still in service, we will not be closing them. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact myself or Mr. Ron Saylor, Environmental and Safety Manager at (661) 833-0429. Sincerely, Elaina Jackson Chief 'Operating Officer : ............... Pacific Wood'Preserving Companies .... 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93:31:3 · Ph: 661-8:3:3-0429 · fax 661-8:36-0766 P.O. Box 968, Boy, AZ 85231 · Ph: 520-466-7801 · fax: 520-466-3607 P.O. Box 320, Leggett, TX 77350 · Ph: 409-398-5745 · Fax: 409-398-5864 P.O. Box 350, Silver Springs, NV 89429 · Ph: 775-577-;>000 · Fax: 775-577-9045 22985 South Ave., Corning, CA 96021 · Phone 530-824-8400 " ~OOl OT/Zd/O1 THU 14:4~ F~X 805 3253098 C 0 B wTR RESRC$ Wasco. ~alif. 93280 ~ove;be~ ~5, Kern Islan'~ :';ater P. O. Box ~akersfielfl, C~lifor~a 93~02 Well ~ 8 350 Feet ~lank Casing~ LO~ 2~0 Feet Perforated 1/8" 15' - 37" O. D. Conductor 15 - 22 S%ndy Soil ~00 Yeet 16" x 5/16 22 . 30 Sand & Gravel ' $~ - 57 Yellow Clay 133- 155 3~nd · 155 - 165 Blue · Y~llow Clay 165 - 195 .Sand & Gravel 195 - 200 Sandy 200- 220 S~nd 220 - 235 Yellow ~ay 235 - 280 S-nd & Gravel 280 - 305 Yellow Clay ' ~05- 325 ~5 - ~30 Yellow Clay 330 - 345 Grzvel 3&5 - 370 Yellow ~ay 370 - ~10 Coarse Sand .'.' ~10 - $30 Yellow O_ay ~30 - ~ Sand · ~10 -. 520 Sand ~73 - 590 Sand . _ ---" Labora~ory MQN'IGOMERY WATSON I-AB~RATORIE5 a Division of Montgoma~f Watson Americas, Inc. t S Aepor t 556 East Walnut Sb'eet ~ 8 1 7 4 ~, Pasadena. Cal~amia 91101 Ta I: 6Z6 568 6400 Fax:.826 568 6324 . . CalifOrnia Water 'Service company Samples Received Kelly Scoffone-O'Dea 22-jun-2001 09:56:33 1720 NOrth First Street 'San Jose, CA 95112 Analyzed Sample# Sample ID Result. UNITS .MDL 21o622ooll' c~ 2-o~ 2106220012 CBK 4-01 2106220013 CBK 7-01 2106220014 CBK 8-01 sUMMARy OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY. Hits Report Page I of 1' MONTGOMERY WATSON ULBoRAToRIES Laboratory a Oi~4$ion of M0q. tg0ma~/WamOfl ~edcu. Inc. ' Da~a Re_ortP ~ E~ Walnut S~8~ ~ 817 ~ 2, P4u~na. Ca.mia 91101 To I: 628 5~ ~ F8~ 828 5~8 California Water· Service Company (continued) Prepared Ana~yzed QC Ref# Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Di-n-BuCylphthalace ND ug/1 0.50 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/B~A 525.2 ~ndrin ND ug/1 0.10 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Fluoran~hene ND ug/1 0.10 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Fluorene ND u&3/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2 ga~xaa-Chlordane ND '' ug/1 0..~50 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ~L/~PA 525.2 ' Hexachlorobenzen~ ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/'01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 52~.2 Hexachlorocyclopancadiene ND ug/1 . 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Hep~achlor ND ug/1 0.040 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:0~ 144963 M~./EPA 525.2 He~cachlor Epoxide ND ~/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Indeno(1,2,3,¢,d)Pyrene. RD ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 14496~ ML/EPA 525.2 Isophorone ND ug/1 0.50 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 hindane ND u9/1 0~020 1 06/22/01' 06424/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2. Msth°XYchlor ND ug/1 0.050 0~/22/01 06/24/01 00=00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Mecribuzin ,~ ND ug/1 0.050 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA '525.2 Molinate ND ~9/1 0:20 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Mstolachlor ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 ~0.:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.'2 cral~s-Nonachlor ND ug/1 0.050 06/22/01 06/24'/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 PenCachlorophenol : ND ~ ug/1 1.0 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Phena~threne * ND ~/1 0.020 1 06/22~01 06/24/01 00:00 144963" ML/EPA 525.2 ~rometryn ND u~/1 0.50 1 0'6/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~A 525.2 Propachlor ND ug/1 01050 0~/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2 Pyre~e ." ND u~/1 . 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Si~zine ND ' ~/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/~4/01 00:00 144963 M~/EPA 525.2 'Thiobencarb ND 'uc3/1 0.20 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Trifluralin ND u~/1 0.10 1 Surrogate ~erylene-d12 82 % Rec .,. CBK 8-01' (2106220014) Sampled on .06/21/01 00:00 ( ) SubContracted AAmlyses None 0.0000 1 525 Semivolatiles by GC/'MS 06/22/0~ 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 2 4-DinitroColuene ND ug/1 0.10 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/BPA 525.2 alpha-Chlordane ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00,:00 144963 ML/EPA 525,2 Diazinon ND ug/1 0.10 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~A 525.2 Ace~aph~h¥1ene ND ug/1 0.10 1 06/22/0i 0,6/24/01 00;00 144963 ML/EPA 52~.2 Alachlor ND u~/1 0'.050 I - D&,ta Report - Page 5 of 7 Laboratory MONTGOMERY WATSON LABORATORIES Data a Oividon of MonCgomefy Watson Americas. Ina, ~ Eo~ Walnut S~.~ # 817 ~ 2 Pasadena, Ca~omia 91101 Ie I: 626 568 ~ F~ 626 5~ 1 ~ ~O ~BS il ~ 5227) California Water Service Company- (continued) Prepared Analyzed QC Ref# Method Ana!yte Result Units ~L Dilu=ion 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ( ML/EPA 525.2 Aldrin ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ( M~/EPA 525.2 Anr21racene ND ug/1 0.020 1 0~/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 I.ML/EPA 525.2 A=razine ND 4/1 0.050 1 06/22/0~ 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2 Benz(a)Anchracmne ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/E~A 525.2 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:'00 144963 Mb/EPA 525.2 Ben~o(b)Fluora~hene 'ND ug/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA' 525.2 Be~zo(g,h,~}Perylene ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Benzo(k)F!uo~an~hene ND ug/1 . 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2' Di(2-~t~ylhexyl)ph~hala~ ND ug/1 0.60 1 · 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Bu~ylbenz¥1ph~ha~at~ ND ug/1 0.50· 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 MI,/EPA '525.2 Bromacil ND ug/1 0.20 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 O0:00 1449~3 ML/EPA 525.2 Bu~achlor 'ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:0'0 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Caffeine .. ND ug/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2 ChrYsene ND ug/1 0.020 1 ~6/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/RPA"525.2 Dibe~z(a,h}An=hracene ND ug/i 0.050 06/22/01 ...06/24/Ol o0:00 14~963 ML/EpA 525.2 Di-(2~E~h~lhex%,l)adi~a~e ND u~/1 0.60 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Diethylph=h~late ND .ug/1 0.50 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 14~963 ML/EPA '525.2 Dieldrin ND ug/1 0.20 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Dime~h¥1phthala~e ND ug/1 0.50 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Dime~hoa:e ND ug/1 10 1 06/22/01 06/24/0100:00 14496h ML/EPA 525~2 Di-n-Bu:ylph~h~la'~e ND ug/1 0.S0' 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 O0:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 ~ndrin ND ug/1 0.10 1 06/22/01 06/24/~1 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Fluora~=hene ND ug/1 0.~0 1 06/~2/0~ 06/24/0~ 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525;2 Fluorene ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 gama~a-Cblordane ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 ' 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Hexachlorobenz~ne ND u~/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~A 525.2 Hexachloro~y¢lopen=ad/ene ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Heptachlor ND U~/1 0.040 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:'00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 Hep~achlor E~oxide ND ug/1 0.0~0 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 M~/~PA 525.2 Indeno(1,2,3,=,d)'Pyrene ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144983 ML/~PA 525.2 ') Isophoro~e ND ug/1 0.50. 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 ) Lindane ND ug/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/~PA 525.2 ) Methox¥ohlor ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/HPA 525.2 ) Me~ribuzin ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 ) Molina=e ND ug/1 0.20 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 1449~3 ML/EPA, 525.2 ) Metolachlor ND ug/1 0.050 1 Data Report Pa~e 6 of 7 MONTGOMERY WATSON LABORATORIES Laboratory a Divi~io, of M--g,,me~y;,-* Watson Americas. in=. Data Re_ortD Paaadafla, Calffomia 91101 Tel: 626 5~ ~00 ~ 626 5~ 6~4 1 ~O 566 ~BS (I 8~ 5~ 522~) California Water Service ComPany (continued) ' Prepared Analyzed QC Kef~ Method Analy~s Result Units MRL Dilution 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/E~A 525.2 ) trans-Nonachlor ND ug/1 0.050 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 } Pencachlorophenol ND og/1 1.0 I .' 06/22/01 06/~4/01 00:00 1449~3 ML/EPA 525.2 } Phenanthrene ND u~/1 0.020 1 06/22/01 06/24/0~ 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 } Proms=fYn ND u~/1 0.50 1 G6/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 MI./EPA 525.2 ) Propachlor . ND ug/1 0.060 1 06/22/01 06/24/01 00=00 144963 MI~/EPA 525.2 )' Pyrene ND ug/I 0.050 1 06/22/01 '06/24/01 00:00 1449~3 ML/EPA 525.2 ) Simazine ND ; ug/1 0.050 1 '06/22/01 06/24/01 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 ) Thiobencarb ND ug/1 0.20 1 06/22/01 06/24/61 00:00 144963 ML/EPA 525.2 ) Trifluralin. ND ug/1 0.10 1 Surrogate ) Perylene-d12 90 % RSc Data Report -' Page 7 of 7 Semivolatile Organics by EPA 62~5/8270C Sample: 2106220014 Date Received: 06-22-01 Matrix: Water. · Date Extracted: 06-22-01 Sample Amount: 1L:lmL Date Analyzed: 06-24-01 Run Number: 53343S07' Instrument ID: HP-3 5973 Units: Dg/L (ppb) Detection CAS ~ Compound concentration Limit 83-32-9 Acenaphthene· ND 1 208-96-8 Acenaphthylene ND 1 120-12-7 Anthracene ND i 56-55-3 Benzo (a) anthracene ND 1 205-99-2 Benzo(b &' k) fluoranthenes ND 1 191-24-2. Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 1 50-32-8 Benz0(a)pyrene ND 1 65-85-0 Benzoic Acid ND 5 100-51-6 Benzyl Alcohol ND 5 111-91-1 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 1 11-44-1. .Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1 39638-32-9 Bis(2-chlor'oisopropyl)ether ND- 1 1i7-8i-7 Bis(2~ethylhexyl)phthalate· ND 1 101-55r3 4-BromophenylI PhenYl.Ether ND 1 85-68-7 Butyl Benzy! Phthalate . ND 1 106-47-8 4-Chloroaniline ND 1 59-50-7 4-Chloro-3-methylPhenol .. ND. 1 91~58-7 2-ChloronaPhthalene ND i 95-57-8· 2-Chlorophenol ND 1 7005-72-3 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl Ether ND 1 218-01-9 Chrys~ne~ ND 1 53-70-3 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND~ 1 132-64-9 Dibenzofuran ND 1 84-74-2 Di-n-butyl Phthalate ND 1 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 541-73-'1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 106-46-7 1,4-Dich.lorobenzene ND 1 91-94-1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 1 Semivolatile Organics by EPA. 625/8270C (~continued) Sample: 2106220014 Date Received: 06-22-01 Matrix~ Water. Date Extracted: 06-22-01. Sample Amount: 1L:lmL Date Analyzed: 06-24~01 Run~ Number: 5334~3S07 Instrument ID: HP-3 5973 Units: ~g/L (ppb) Detection CAS ~ ~Qmpound Concentration Limit 120-33-2 ·2,4-Dichloropheno! ND 1 84-66-2 Diethyl Phthalate ND 1 105-67-9 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 1 131-11-3 DimethYl Phthalate ND 1 534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro-2-me~hylphenol ND 5. 51-28-5 2.,4-Dinitrophenol ND 5 121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 1 606-20-2 2~6-Dinitrotoluene ND 117-84-~ Di-n-octyl Phthalate ND 1 122-66-7 1,2-Dipheny!hy~razine * ND 1 204-44-0 Fluoranthene ND 1 86 73-7 Fluorene ~ ND 1 118-74-1 'Hexadhlorobenzene ND 1 87-68-3 Hexa~hlorobutadiene ND 1 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 1 67-72'-1 H~xachloroethane ND 1 193-39-5 IndenO (!, 2,3- cd) pYrene ND 1 78-59-1 Isophorone . ND 1 91--57-6 2~Methylnaphthalene ND 95-48-7 2-Methylphenol. ND t 3/4-MethylPhenol .f, ND 1 91-20-3 Naphthalene ND- 1 88-74-4 2-Nitr°aniline ND 5 99-09-2 3-Nitroaniline ND 5 100-01-6 4-Nitroaniline ND 5 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene ND 1 · - Cannot be separated from Azobenzene. Semi~olatile Organi, cs by EPA 625/8270C (continued) Sample: 2106220014? Date.Received: .06-22-01 Matrix: Water Date Extracted: 06-22-01 Sample Amount: 1L:lmL Date Analyzed: 06-24-01 Run Number: 53343S07 Instrument ID: HP-3 5973 Units: ~g/L' (ppb) Detection CAS ~' Compound Concentration Limit 88-75-5 2-Nit~ophenol ND 1 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol ND 5 62-75-9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine · ND 1 86-30-6 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ** ND 1 621-64-7 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ND 1 87-86-5. Pentachl0ropheno1 ND 5 85-01L8 Phenanthrene ND 1 108-95-2 Phenol. ND 1 129-00-0 Pyrene ND 1 120-82-1 1,2,4-TriCh~orobenzene ND 1 95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 5 88-06-2 2,4~6-Trichlorophenol ND'~ 1 · * - Cannot be separated frOm Diphenylam±ne. Percent Surrogate Recovery OC Limits Phenol-d5 77 19-139 ~' 2-Fluorophenol 85 21-154. Nitrobenzene-d5 84 35-114 2-Fluorobiphenyl 78 43-116 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 82 10-123 p-Terphenyl-d~4 123 44-141 Semivolatile Organics by EPA 625/8270C (continued) Tentatively Identified Compounds Sample: 2106220014 Date .Received: 06-22-01 Matrix: Water Date Extracted: 06-22-01 Sample Amount: 1L:lmL Date AnalyZed: 06-~24-01 Run Number: 53343S07 Instrument ID: HP-3 5973 Units: Dg/L (ppb) APproximate Compound concentration None Found CBK WELLS 2-01, 4-01, 7-01, AND 8-01 COPPERr~ ARSENICr AND CHROMIUM TESTING HISTORY -METAL DLR~ CA PHG3 (mglL) ' MCL (SMCL)2 (mglL) (mglL) COPPER 0,050 (1.,0/ AL=I,3 0,170 ARSENIC 0,002 0,050 none CHROMIUM 0,010 0.050 · 0.0025 ~Detection limit for reporting purposes 2Maximum Contaminant Level (Secondary Ma)dmum Contaminant Level) 3California's Public Health Goal · ' WELL 2-01 .WELL 7-01 TESTING COPPER ARSENIC CHROMIUM TESTING ·COPPER ARSENIC CHROMIUM . DATE . '.(mglL) (mglL) (mglL) DATE (mglL)' (mg/L) (mg/L) '' 07/27/99 0,00 0.000 0.000 03/28/00 0,00 '0,000 0.000 03/11/96 0,00 0,008 0,000 .- 02/25/97 0,06 0,010. 0.000 "'08/08/93 '0,00 · '0,000 0,000' 10/04/94 ' 0.00 . 0,000 0,000 "03/13/90 'i '0.00 0.000. 0.000 04/02/91 ...0,00.. 0,000 . 0.000 03124/87 . 0.00 ' 0.000 0.001 ~. .Q5/16/88 ' . 0.00 0.000 0.000 ' 03!19/87 0.00 · .12/18/85 0.00 . 12/18/85 0.00 10127/83 . 0.00 10/27~83 O. O0 -. · -~ 2/04/79 0.00 · , . WELL 4-01 . WELL 8-01 TESTING .COPPER ARSENIC CHROMIUM TESTING ·COPPER ARSENIC CHROMIUM -DATE (mglL) (mgiL) (mglL) DATE (mglL) (mglL) (mglL). 07/27/99 0,10 0,000 0.000 03/28/00 0,00 0.004 0,000 03/12/96. 0.00 0.000 0.000 . 02/25/97 0,00 ' 0,010 0.000 O5/03/93 0.08 0,000 0,000 10/04/94 0,30 0.000 0.000 03/12/90 0, 08 0,000 0,000 04/02/91 0.00 0,000 0,000 - ~ 03/24/87 0.00 0.000 0.000 05/15/88 0,16 0.000 0.000 12/16/86 0.00 0.000 0.000 03/18/86 0,00 O8/15/84 · 0,00 07/29/83 0,02 0,000 0,000 11/09/82 0,00 08/31/81 0,00 06/20/01 DIST : gBK 12:.38 WATER TYPE .... : GROUND. STATE ID #: '308/27E-15P01M STATUS ........ : ACTIVE ' FIRST USED: 1973 ~' · · TREATMENT TYPE: NONE REASON'. ....... : NONE CHLORINATION..~ LIQUID-HYPO RECENT INORGANIC SAMPLES (Use option 5 for detail) **** 0-3-/Y~7~1 . ~3-7P-870-0 RECENT ORGANIC SAMPLES (Use option 6 for detail.) · 03/i-87~1 10/31-/-00---1-0-/3~F/U0' OPTION: iUPD 2WMH 3NTC 4NTV 5irH 60-H 9PRT Fl=HELP 2=PAGE PF3=END PF4=RETURN 6=ALT-PATH PF7=BACKWi~RD 8=FORWB_RD 10=PRINTSCR 12=SAVE ENT=OPTION 06/20/01~ 12:38:48 PAGE: 1- 1 INOP~IC HISTORY DIST~CBK 'SOURCE: 8-01 SAMP-DATE LAB~ID-NO ,SO4 CL NO3 NO2 H~D TDS HCO3 CO3 OH ALK~f' 0i. 03/28/00 24085BBSK 02. 03/14/01 P14522 '* * 3 * 03. 03/28/00 ' 24085 14 8. 3 0.00 86 '159 120 00.00 0. 100 .04. 07/19/99 P13702 * * 6' * * * * *' * * 05. 06/15/98 P13381 * * 4 * * * * * * * 06. 02/25/97 23390 20 11 5 0.00 122 210 159 00.80 0 132 07. 06/03/96 P12958 08. 01/31/95 P12724 * 09.~10/04/94 22808 27 10,., 7 0.00 122 ' 217 154 00.80 0 128 10. 07/12/93 P12245 11. 04/02/91 22025' '24 13 8 * 119 215 152 00.50 0 126 12. 05/16/88 21305' 25 12 6 * 111 205 143 00.70 0 119 13. 05/16/88 CH2MHILL * * * * * * * * * * 14. 03/18/86 20567 27 13. 6 * .108 200 133 00.50 0 110 15. 07/29/83 19784 23 12 5 * 111 210 148 00.70 0 123 16. 08/31/81 19224 16 12 4 * 1,10 183 135 00.70 0 112 LINE: COL: LOW: HIGH: TOT: MESSAGE: 3=END 8=FORWi~D g=LEFT 10=RIGHT !i~PRINTSCRN 12=SAVE ENT=INQUI DISTRICT : CBK ~== INORGANIC RESULTS --- 00/00/00 12:39 SOURCE : 8-01 LAB ID-NO: 24085 BATCH-NO.:f073 ' SAMP-DATE: 03/28/00 sAMP-T!ME: 08:1'5 HOURS-RUN: 18.0 ANLY-DATE: 03/29/00 CALC-DATE:.00/00/00 ARCHVE-DT: 05/16/00 DOHS DATE: 07/17/00 'CATIONS HARDNESS : 86 CALCIUM' : 29 MAGNESIUM: SODIUM : 20 POTASSIUM: '2.1 --- ANIONS BICARBNTE: 120 CB_RBONATE: 0.00 HYDROXIDE: 0 TOT. ALKY: 100 SULFATE' : 14 CHLORIDE : 8 NITRATE : 3 NITRITE : O. 000 FLUORIDE : 0.17 CATIONS => 2.6488 i~IONS => 2.5684 ION-ERR => 3.0799- PH : 8.01 ~COLOR : 0 CONDUCT. : 269 T.D.S. : 159 TURBIDITY:. 0'.05 CALC-COND: 256 MBAS : 0.000' ~ ODOR: 0 TYPE:' COND-ERR : 4.8327- OPTION: 0WEL 1FM 2FMH 3APP 4DHS 5I-H 9PRT Fi=HELP 2=PAGE 'PF3=END PF4=RETURN PF7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD' 9=PAYMENT 'i0=PRINTSCR 12=SAVE ENT=OPTION PESTICIDE & AGR LTURAL CHEMICALS ANALYSI ESULTS 06/70/01 /~-~alysis ~ .... : ', 13937 Create'd: 07/08/91 District · CBK : Updated: 05/06/97 16:15 Source ...... 1.: ~ By.: SYSTEM ~ ~ Laboratory .... : FGL ENVIRONMENTAL' Date ColleCted: 04/16/91 'Time 'Co!t~cted: Hrs Run:. Coll'ector Date Received.: Time Received.: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed.: DOHS Transfer,: Frequency~ Co~tmtents ...... : · CHEMICAL C. ONCEN, CHEMICAL CONCEN. CHEMICAL CONCEN. ALACHLOR ND ATRAZINE ND MOLINATE ND SIMAZINE ND BROMACIL ND BUTACHLOR ND DIAZINON ND DIMETHOATE ND METOLACHLOR ND METRIBUZIN ND PROMETON ND PROMETRYN ND PROPACHLOR ND' THIOBENCARB ND 3=END 4=LEVEL-]. '7=PREV 8=NEXT il=LIST DBC~'EDBANALYSIS RESULTS 06/20/01 Analysis' # .... : 16205. , Created; 10/10/9~. District.. ..... : CBK : Updated: 07/22/9'7 0'8:59 Source .... ~ By: SYSTEH Laboratory .... : [)ate Collected: 09/25/91 Time Collected:' Hfs Run: Collector Date Received.: Time' Received.: Date Extracted; Date Analyzed.: DOHS Transfer'.; Frequency: Co~f~ents ...... ; CHEMICAL CONCEN. CHEMICAL" CONCEN. CHEMICAL CONCEN. DBCP ND. EDB ~ -3=END 4=LEVEL-1 7=PREV 8=NEXT .ii=LIST VOLATILE ' IC CHEMICALS ANALYSIS ~ULTS 06/20/0]. V ANALYSIS METHOD 502.2 ' -- AnalYsis # .... : 17179 Created:. 02/i8/98 15:07 District."L.~..: CBK Updated' .02/18/98 15:07 Source ...... r..: ~ '. By: VERONICA Laboratory .... : CALIF. ~ATER SVC. ' Date Collected: 02/09/98 Time Collected: 11:00 Hfs Run: 2';00 Collector Date Received.' 02/10/98 Time 'Received.: Date 'Extracted: Date Analyzed.: 02/12/98 DOHS Transfers: ' Frequency: ROUTINE Co~m~ent s ...... : CHEMICA~ CONCEN. CHEMICAL coNcEN. CHEMICAL' CONCEN. BDCM ND TBM ND- TCM ND CDBM ND ODCBENZ ND TT~ ND BENZ ND CTC ND ETBENZ ND PDCBENZ ND llDCA ND 12DCA ND llDCE ND Ci_DCE ND T12DCE ND 12DCPA ND T13DCPE ND DCM' ND CBENZ~ ND STY ND l122PCA ND PCE ND TOL ' ND 124TCBENZ ND F2=PAGE 3 =EI<I'I) 4=LEVEL-1 7=PREV 8=NEXT ]. i=L I S T ZALCO RATORIES, IN . Analytical ~ Consulting Services .. 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 9330B . FAX (661) 395-3069 California Water Service . Laborat0ryNo: 0106282 3725 South H Street ... Date Received: 06/22/01 Bakersfield, CA 93304 . Date Reported: 07/02/01 Contract No: Attention: Kim Hedrick ~ Report Re-Printed 07/02/01 Description: See Below Sampled by Diane Allen REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS . Chromium, Cr Lab Sample Date Time Number Description Sampled Sampled ug/L 0106282-1 CBK 2 District Blvd 06/22/01 ND 0106282-2 CBK 4 New Stine 06/22/01 ND 0106282-3 CBK 7 Wilson : 06/22/01 ND 0106282-4 CBK 8' District Blvd 06/22/01 ND Date Analyzed: 06/22~/01 Analyst: BCL ' Detection Limit for ' Reporting: 3 . 2 . ~ ' ' On, Lab Operations Manager CC: / mg/kg : m~lligrams per kilogram (parts per million.) 5. APHA Standard Methods, 18th Edition 1992 ~' ug/kg : ~icrograms per kilogram (parts per billion 10. EPA 600/R-93-100,. August 1993 ppmv : parts per million volume ND: None Detected NSS; Not Sufficient Sample This repo~t is furnished {or the excJusJve use o~ our Customer and,applies only lo .the samples tested. Zaico is not responsible for repod alteretipn or detachment. ZALC30 RAT. CRIES, IN Amalycical.~ ConsUlting. Services 4309 Armour Avenue : (661) 395~053B Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 California Water Service Laboratory No: 0106282-4 3725 South H Street Date Received: 06/22/01 Bakersfield, CA 93304 Date Reported: 06/25/01 Contract No. :. Attention: Klm Hedrick Date Sampled : 06/22/01 ' .. Time Sampled : Sample Type: Dcm. Water Description: CBK 8 District Bled . Sampled by Diane Allen " REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Constituents 'Results Units DLR Method/Ref Chromium, Cr < 10 ug/L 10 200.7/10 Copper, Cu 8.0 .ug/L 10 200.7/10 Arsenic, As < 2.0 ug/L 2.0 3113-B/5 Date Analyzed· 06/22/01 15:51:11 SMS ~ /-/~ /// / I__ ~m'Ethe~ton, L~' pat~ons' Manager Me~hod ·Reference 5. APHA Standard Methods, 18th Edition 1992 ~/L : milligrams per Liter (par~s per million 10. EPA 600/R-93-100, August 1993 ug/L : micro, rams per Liter (parts per .billion . umhos/cm ; micromhos/cm at ~5 C ~hos/cm': 'millimhos/cm at 25 C ND : None De~ec~ed N/A : Not Applicable DLR ; De~ection Limit ~or Reportin9 Purposes MBAS ; Methylene Blue Active Substances OF BAKEI~SFIELD~ |NI-:.o 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 o Fax 661-836-0766 Email: information@pacificwood.com · Web: www. pacificwood.com July 12, 2001 Ralph Huey Howard Wines Dear Sirs, Enclosed you will find the information that you requested. We are always striving to improve the work environment for our employees, and thank you for your expertise and suggestions during your recent visit to our facility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Ron Saylor Environmental Health & Safety Manager Enclosure cc: Ron Laughlin 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 RO. Box 968, Eloy, AZ 8523! · Ph: 520-466-7801 · Fax: 520-466-3607 RO. Box 320, Leggett, TX 77350 · Ph: 409-398-5745 · Fax: 409-398-5864 RO. Box 350, Silver Springs, NV 89429 · Ph: 775-577-2000 · Fax: 775-577-9045 22985 South Ave., Corning, CA 96021 · Phone 530-824-8400 July 12, 2001 Here is the information that you had requested regarding your recent inspection of our Bakersfield facility. If there is any additional information you need that we may provide for you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Ron Saylor 1. Regarding the Oxygen and Acetylene tanks that were improperly chained down: We immediately re-chained the Oxygen tanks, and lowered the chains on the Acetylene tanks, away from their necks. 2. Regarding the need for our employees to be wearing rubber boots, provided by us, while working on the drip pad: We immediately purchased enough rubber boots for all of our Treaters, Managers, Supervisors and Maintenance Crews. Also, we will no longer be doing any tagging of the lumber on the Drip Pads, and we have instructed all other personnel that they must walk around the Pad at all times. 3. Regarding the NFPA definition for CCA requiring the placard warning to be a 3" and not a 2~.'We immediately changed the placards to reflect this information. 4. Regarding air emissions and permits of our CCA tanks: I have included the exemption documents for your review that we believe shows that we are not required to maintain individual permits for each tank. I have also included copies of our most recent PEL monitoring results that we did as a t~est management practice'.' 5. Regarding the four hazardous chemicals that are not currently listed in our Hazardous Inventory (Borates, Oxygen, Acetylene, and lubricate): We will gladly expedite their listing as soon as we receive the copy from you of our currently listed inventory. 6. Regarding your request, to see any recent soil samples done at this facility: As I informed Howard during our phone conversation, we did not have any soil tested as we are not under any requirements to do so, short of investigating a spill. However, since your visit, we have taken samples of the areas you were inquiring, so I have included these results for you with this letter. DF' I=IAKE~iFIELD~ INm', 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 Email: information@pacificwood.com · Web: www. pacificwood.corn January 12,2000 Ron Saylor Pacific Wood Preserving 5601 District Boulevard Bakersfield, CA 93313 RE: PEL Monitoring Dear Mr. Saylor: PEL monitoring was conducted at your facility for the following: Air Contaminant(s): Arsenic Date of Monitoring: 11-19-99 Sampler: Jane House The attached form provides details of the results and is for your convenience and to aid in compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1910.1020, Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records. Within five working days from the receipt of this notice, it is necessary that you comply with the requirements below: · The employee'sampled must review, sign and date the form. · The form (or a copy) should be posted for review by employees who work in the same environment but may not have been sampled. Once the above has been completed, file the original. It must be kept for 30 years and available for employee review. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and your employees. If a second monitoring is required or you have any questions, please contact us at (404) 362-3970. Sincerely Jane House ~,..~ Regulatory Compliance JH/Ij Attachment 5 istrict BI . · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 P.O. Box 968, EI~j~.A,V~2~rP, J~¢'-466-7801 · Fax: 520-466-3607 RO. Box 320, Leggett, TX 77350 · Ph: 409-398-5745 · Fax: 409-398-5864 RO. Box 350, Silver Springs, NV 89429 · Ph: 775-577-2000 · Fax: 775-577-9045 22985 South Ave., Corning, CA 96021 · Phone 530-824-8400 PEL MONITORING PROGRAM RESULTS AIR MONITORING SURVEY Pacific Wood Preserving 5601 District Boulevard Bakersfield, CA 93313 SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE EMPLOYEE NAME OR JOB TITLE OR TIME Arsenic EMPLOYEE I.D. DATE LOCATION SAMPLED DESCRIPTION (MINS) (TWA-ug/m3) INITIALS/DATE PLOl119- 11-19-99 Richmond Cunny Drip Pad Op. 314 <0.80 A1 PLO1119-1 11-19-99 Cylinder door 465 3.0 PLOl119- 11-19-99 Chris Zent Treating Sup. 385 <0.65 B1 WEATHER CONDITIONS: 70's, Clear 1. Samples for Arsenic were collected on mixed cellulose ester (MC) membrane filters using MSA Escort Elf sampling pumps. 2. Samples for WoOd Dust were collected on pre-weighed PVC filters using MSA Escort Elf sampling pumps. 3. All sampling pumps are calibrated monthly. 4. All analyses are performed per the NIOSH method by an approved outside laboratory. 5. Arsenic PEL level is 10 ug/m3. If monitoring demonstrates that air-borne arsenic levels are above the PEL, employees'are required to wear air.O purifying respirators equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter cartridges (HEPA filters). If the results are above the arsenic action level of 5 -~ ug/m3, then monitoring is required again within 6 months. 6. Wood dust PEL level is 15 mg/m3. If monitoring demonstrates that air-borne wood dust levels are above the PEL, employees are required to wear air-purifying respirators equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter cartridges (HEPA filters). Sampling was performed by: Jane House Hickson Corporation Any questions concerning the results of this survey, please contact Hickson Corporation at (404) 362-3970. Jul-il-01 05:06P Z~lco .aboratorl~s, Inc. 661 5-3069 P.02 ,Lq ZALF]O LAEIOR ..(TL-]I:::qlES, Ib40. Analytical & Consulting Service8 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 885-0839 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 ~acific Wood Preserv~ Laboratory No: 0~07106-1 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Dabe Reported: 07/11/01 Contract NO. Attention: Ron Sa¥1or Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : Sample Type: Solid Description: W~apping Area ~ Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF AI~ALYTICgLL RESULTS Constituents Results Units DSR Method/Re£ Copper, Cu 210 mg/k~ 12.5 Chromium, Cr 100 mg/k~ 2.5 6010A/I Arsenic, Ae 89 mg/k~ 1.0 6010A/1 Date Analyzed: 07/11/01 16:25:56 SMS /// ./ -. , "- Jim E~rton, Lab Operationm Manager / / Her bod Re £ez'onr:e ff umhos/c~ : mjcro~o~/cm aC 25 ~ ~ho~/cm : milLl~u=~/cm a~ 2R C ~ : None DekecCed N/A - Not A}~t~licable Thi~ repod in fi~rnished [or lhe exchr, ive use of our Customer oecd opphe.-, only to ~le) samples tested, ZoJco is nok respom~ibJe fo~ report alter~llo~% Or d~.locklmenL Jul-il-01 05:06P Zalco ~boratories, Inc. 661 5-3069 P.03 Anal ioal & Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (~B 1) 395-0~39 Bakersfield, California 92308 F~ (661) 395-~069 Pacific Wood Preserve L~oraCo~ No; 0107106-2 5601 District Blvd. Date Recelved: 07/11/01 ~akersfield, CA 9~f{].3 Date R~oxt~d; 07/11/01 Contract No, : Attentions; Ron Saylor DaCe Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sable .~e: Solid Description: Wrappln~ Area ~ Sampled by Ron Saylor RRPORT OF ~AL~IC~ RESETS Cons t i tuent S Result s Units DLR Met hod/Re f Copper, Cu 190 m~/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, C~' 120 mg/kg 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, AS 65 m~/kg ~ .0 6010A/1 Date Analyzed; 07/11/01 16.'36:04 SMS /' ~,.,., ~ ~ "- . CC; ~ . Me[ho~ Refereu~e / u,n~/cm . ~icro~o~/cm a~ 25 C -'~ n. nhos/C~n : r.~illitnh0$~cm ~t 25 C N/A ~ NOC Alal;lical%lc This r~por~ is ~utni~h~d {c>r ~hm exclu~v~ u.~. of ou¢ Cuslom~.r amd 0pplims only to t~e sumple, s ~led. 7ulco is mol respons;ble for r,r~rt oite,~lion ar detach,'nenl. J~l-ll-O1 O5:O7P Zalco aboratories, Inc. 661-~5-3069 P.O4 4309 Armour Avenue {1361) 395-0539 _ : _ Bakersfield. California 93308 FAX {6131) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Led~o~'atoz'y No: 0107106-3 5~01 Distric~ BI. vd. Date Received; 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Rep~rtad: 07/11/01 Con~ract No. : A~tention: Ron Kaylor Date Sampled : 07/10/0% Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample TlrPe: Solid Description: Wrappin~ Area # Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL' R~SULTS Cons t ituent ~ Result s Uni t s DLR Me thod/R= f Copper, Cu 3';0 mg/k~ 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr 120 m~/k~ 2.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, AS 100 ~3/k~ 1.0 6010A/1 Date Analyzed: 07/11/01 1~:36:12 SMS ,//. ,' M~thod R~feren~e ., 1. EPA SW-846. 1994 )rd Editio~ / m~/~ : milligt'~ams pez bite~ (part~ p,~.r million %,9/L : micr~zams ~-r bite~ ND ~ Notre r~ecccd N/A : Not ,%pplic~ble MBA$ ~ Me~l~vlel%~ Blue Act~v~ This report ;~ furnished I'or the exclusiv¢ use o[ our Custonter and opplies only Io the ~ornp)es msted. Za]co is not resDoi~sible {or reoo,1 ulte~aHc, n or del0chment. Jul-Il-01 OB:O7P ZalCO~lkaborat°ries, Inc- 661 5-3069 P.05 ZAL O L_ .BOF ATOFtlESS, IF Analytical ~ Consulting Servioes 4309 Armour Avenue (661) ~95-0539 Bakersfield, California ~3308 FAX (66t) 395-3059 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-4 ~601 District ~Ivd. Da=e Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/]0/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample Type: So]id Description: Wrapping Area ~ Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS ConstituenLs ~esults Units DLR M~thod/Ret Copper, Cu 240 m~/k9 12.~ 6010A/1 Chromium, C~ 85 mg/kg 2,5 6010A/1 Arsenic, As 68 mg/kg 't.O 6010A/l Date 7%a]alyzed: 07/11/01 1~;36:18 SMS ... '/" . .. ...... , ; cc; _t ,----'"~ /~/E/~erton,' T,ab Opez'-ations MalTager )4-. t hocl ~m ference -/ / ]. EPA ~ 8a6, lg~ ~rd E~]i~ion ; ' Ug/L : mlC'rogran,:; per ~,hos/~m . millimhos/Cm ND : No~,c N/A : Not ApDl{cable ~A$ : Meth~lel~e Blue Th~s rcDorl Js furnished/or Ihe exclusive use o~ ou~ C.~omer ond eppf~es anly to she s0~npleu lesied. Z~lco is tq0t'responsible for reDod olle~ohon or dolochnle~l. ~'601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 Email: information@pacificwood.com · Web: www. pacificwood.com July 12, 2001 Ralph Huey Howard Wines Dear Sirs, Enclosed you will find the information that you requested. We are always striving to improve the work environment for our emplOyees, and thank you for your expertise and suggestions during your recent visit to our facility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Ron Saylor Environmental Health & Safety Manager Enclosure :~ cc: Ron Laughlin 5601 District Blvd., Bakersfield, CA 93313 · Ph: 661-833-0429 · Fax 661-836-0766 P.O. Box 968, Eloy, AZ 85231 · Ph: 520-466-7801 · Fax: 520-466-3607 RO. Box 320, Leggett, TX 77350 · Ph: 409-398-5745 · Fax: 409-398-5864 22985 South Ave., Corning, CA 96021 · Phone 530-824-8400 July 12, 2001 Here is the information that you had requested regarding your recent inspection of our Bakersfield facility. If there is any additional information you need that we may provide for you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Ron Saylor 1. Regarding the Oxygen and Acetylene tanks that were improperly chained down: We immediately re-chained the Oxygen tanks, and lowered the chains on the Acetylene tanks, away fi.om their necks. 2. Regarding the need for our employees to be wearing rubber boots, provided by us, while working on the drip pad: We immediately purchased enough rubber boots for all of our Treaters, Managers, Supervisors and Maintenance Crews. Also, we will no longer be doing any tagging of the lumber on the Drip Pads, and we have instructed all other personnel that they must walk around the Pad at all times. 3. Regarding the NFPA definition for CCA requiring the placard warning to be a ~" and not a 2~.'We immediately changed the placards to reflect this information. 4. Regarding air emissions and permits of our CCA tanks: I have included the exemption documents for your review that we believe shows that we are not reqUired to maintain individual permits for each tank. I have also included copies of our most recent PEL monitoring results that we did as a 15est management practice'.' 5. Regarding the four hazardous chemicals that are not currently listed in our Hazardous Inventory (Borates, Oxygen, Acetylene, and lubricate): We will gladly expedite their listing as soon as we receive the copy fi.om you of our currently listed inventory. 6. Regarding your request to see any recent soil samples done at this facility: As I informed Howard during our phone conversation, we did not have any soil tested as we are not under any requirements to do so, short of investigating a spill. However, since your visit, we have taken samples of the areas you were inquiring, so I have included these results for you with this letter. pWp3 OF' BAKERSFIELD~ INO. Email: information(~pacificwood.com · Web: www. pacificwood.com January 12,2000 Ron Saylor Pacific We(Sd Preserving 5601 District Boulevard Bakersfield, CA 93313 RE: PEL Monitoring Dear Mr. Saylor: PEL monitoring was conducted at your facility for the following: Air Contaminant(s): Arsenic Date of Monitoring: 11-19-99 Sampler: Jane House The attached form provides details of the results and is for your convenience and to aid in compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1910.1020, Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records. Within five working days from the receipt of this notice, it is necessary that you comply with the requirements below: · The employee sampled must review, sign and date the form. / · The form (or a copy) should be posted for review by employees who work in the same environment but may not have been sampled. Once the above has been completed, file the original. It must be kept for 30 years and available for employee review. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and your employees. If a second monit0i'ing is required or you have any questions, please contact us at (404) 362-3970. · Sincerely .... Jane House Regulatory Compliance J H/Ij Attachment 5b'~l~istrict Bl')13~.,c~kt~rs~,f~l~· Ph: 661-833~429 · RO. ~x 968, E1~.~2~-466-7801 · F~: 5~466-3607 RO. Box 320, Legged, TX 77350 · Ph: 409-398-5745 · F~: 409-398-5864 R0. Box 350, Si)vet Springs, NV 89429 · Ph: 775-577-Z000 · 22985 South Ave., Corning, ~ 96021 · Phone 530-824-8400 PEL MONITORING PROGRAM RESULTS AIR MONITORING SURVEY Pacific Wood Preserving 5601 District Boulevard 'Bakersfield, CA 93313 SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE EMPLOYEE NAME OR JOB TITLE OR TIME Arsenic EMPLOYEE I.D. DATE · LOCATION SAMPLED DESCRIPTION (MINS) (TWA-ug/m3) INITIALS/DATE PLOl119- 11-19-99 Richmond Cunny Drip Pad Op. 3t4 <0.80 A1 PLOl119-1 11-19-99 Cylinder door 465 3.0 PLO1119- 11-19-99 Chris Zent Treating Sup. 385 <0.65 B1 WEATHER CONDITIONS: 70's, Clear 1. Samples for Arsenic were collected on mixed cellulose ester (MC) membrane filters using MSA Escort Elf sampling pumps. 2. Samples for Wood Dust were collected on pre-weighed PVC filters using MSA Escort Elf sampling pumps. 3. All sampling pumps are calibrated monthly. 4. All analyses are performed per the NIOSH method by an approved outside laboratory. 5. Arsenic PEL level is 10 ug/m3. If monitoring demonstrates that air-borne arsenic levels are above the PEL, employees are required to wear air purifying respirators equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter cartridges (HEPA filters). If the results are above the arsenic action level of 5 ug/m3, then monitoring is required again within 6 months. 6. Wood dust PEL level is 15 mg/m3. If monitoring demonstrates that air-borne wood dust levels are above the PEL, employees are required to wear air-purifying respirators equipped with high-efficiency particulate filter cartridges (HEPA filters). Sampling was performed by: Jane House Hickson Corporation Any questions concerning the results of this survey, please contact Hickson Corporation at (404) 362-3970. Jul-Il-01 05:06P Zalco Laboratories, Inc. 661195-3069 P.02 ZAL(_,O LABOR .TORIEc , I[ JC. Analytical ~ Oon~ul~ing Service~ 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395°0589 Bakersfield, ~Ufornia 93308 FAX (861) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No; 0107106.1 5601 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield. CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 ConLract' NO. AttcnCion: ROn Sa¥1or Dais Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sable Type: Solid Description: Wrapping Area ~ Sailed by Ron Saylor ~PORT OF ~ICAL RESULTS Cons=ituent~ Resul=s Units DLR Me=hod/Re~ Chromium, Cr 100 ~/kg 2.5 6010A/I ~senic, AS 89 ~/kg 1.0 6016A/1 /~im 'E/erCon, bah Operationa Manage: laetbo~ Reteronc~ " 2. eta ~-8~6. ~994 2rtl ~dit:on ,~./b , ~l~igca~ 9e~ biter (pa~'L~ ~r m~l,,~ ~oa/Cm , mi~l~uf;/cm a~ 2~ C ~ : None OCR : oeL~,;~ton b~nm~l' for kel~;rtil%9 L'U~'l~es Thb ,epor~ In R;rrdlhed lot Iht exd,nive use of our Cueomet a~d opplm.~ on~ to die ~amplel ,aired. Zoko is nc~ resp~ns~l,s fc~ rr. m0,f al?er~fion or delochn~ent. Jul-Il-01 OB:O6P Zalco boratories~ Inc. 66 )95-3069 P.03 ,il --II ZAL. CO L BOR ' 1'ORIES, Analytical Consulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue ~ (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield. California 93308 ~ F~ (661 ) 395-3069 Pacific ~oo~ Pzesecve ~o~atu~ No; 0107106-2 5~01 District Blvd. Date Received: 07/li/01 ~akersfield, CA 93313 Date R~ox~ed; 07/11/01 Contract No. : Attentio$~: Ron Saylor Da=o Sampled : 07/10/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sable ~e: Solid Description: Wrappin~ Area ~ Samp]ed by Ron Saylor R~RT OF~L~I~S~TS Consbituent~ Results Units DLR Method/Ref Copper, ~ 19~ ~/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, C~- 120 ~/kg 2.5 6010~1 ~'~enic, AS 65 ~/kg 1.0 ~01.0A/I Date ~nalyzed; 07/11/01 16:36;04 SMS ~/"/'~' ~..~.~._.../__~___._~._._L..~ CC; / Jim ~therton, Lab Operatton~ //' ND : None Pet,.coed This rcl;~Orl il ~urn~lhed for ~hn ~x¢lusive u.~ of ou~ Cuslorn~r ond Ol~lJe, only Io ~h! sumplez kited. Z~lco is nel ,e$~ons~le Tar report oile~al;on or deta~h~enl. jul-Il-01 05:07P Zalco Laboratories, Inc. 661 ;95-3069 P.04 Analytical & Consulting Servioes 4309 Armour Avenue {661) 395-0~39 Bakersfieldt California 93308 . . _ _, FAX .(6B1) 395-3069 Paci£ic Wood Preserva Laboratory No:' 0107106-3 5601 District Bl. vd. Date Received: 07/11/01 Bakersfield, CA 93.)13 Dace Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. : Attention: Ron Saylor Date Sampled : 07/10/01 Time .~amp]ed : 18:00 Sample Type; Solid Description: Wrapping Area # Sampled by Ron SaylOr RE~ORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Const ituent~ Result s Units OLR Method/R= f Copper, Cu 370 mcj/kg 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cr 120 m~/kg '2'5 60~0A/1 Areenic, AS 100 mg/k~ 1.0 601OA/I L z~on, i, ab O~erationg Manager N/A , Not Appli~:0ble MB~ , He~hvle~m~ Blue ACtlV~ $msb~c~n"-G Jul-Il-01 OB:07P Zalco Laboratoria~, Inc. 661~9~-3069. P.05 ---~ ZALOO L.ABORATORIES~- Analytical ~ Oonsulting Services 4309 Armour Avenue (661) 395-0539 Bakersfield, California 93308 FAX (661) 395-3069 Pacific Wood Preserve Laboratory No: 0107106-¢ ~601 Distric~ Blvd. Date Receive(]: 07/11/01 8akerefield, CA 93313 Date Reported: 07/11/01 Contract No. Attention~ ~on Saylor Date Sampled : 07/]0/01 Time Sampled : 18:00 Sample.Type: So]id Description: Wrappin9 Ar=a ~ ' Sampled by Ron Saylor REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Con~tituen%~.~ Hesult~ Uaits DLR Copper, Cu 240 mg/k~ 12.5 6010A/1 Chromium, Cz 8S mp/kg ~.5 6010A/1 Arsenic, A~ 68 mg/kg 'l.0 6010A/l Date Analyzed: 07/11/01 1&:36:15 SMS :..- ~' ,, ..... -, CC; / / 846, 1994 uhdlo~/c~ . mnicr~hos/cm ~C 25 C ~om/cm . milti~os/Cm, at ~'.5 C MD : NOtmc ~8 , Me~hwle~e Rlue AC~J. vm JUN-2?-01 NED 12:01 PM FAX NO. P. 04/19 KI,;RN COUNTY ~IR POLLUTION dON'J'RO~ ~'l'Rltq~ ' RULR 202 - P~IT ~XEMPT[ONS Adopted 4/IS/72, Amended R/I0/74, 12/17/74, 6/30/80, 12/] 5/~0, 4/25/SR, I 1/1 ~/~5~ 4/~0/90, 8/~ 9/9 !, 5/2/96, I/N/9~ l, 'Cal~[orpi~ Health and Safely Code (cH & SC) Exgmptions; ~eith~r an ~uthority to Con~Lrtl~t Imf ~ Pgm~Jt to Opem~ shall be rcqulmd lbr the Co1Iowin~: A. Any equipment used for agricultural operations in thc growing of crops or the raising of fowl or ammals. (f. ll & SC, Sectmu 42310(e)); B. Any structure de$igned for and used exclusively as a dwelling for not more than four Ihmilies and any incinerator used exclusively in conn¢~lion with such structure {CI Sections 42310(b) and C. Motor vehicles as defined by tho Ve}fiele Code of the State of Califi)rnia (CH & Section 42310 (a)), btfl not including any soume operalion mounted on sucl~ vehiole that would ofl~e~ise require a permit under provisions of the District Rnles and Regulations; D. R~pairs or maintenance not involving stmotuml changes to any source operation with a Permit to Operate (CII & SC, Section 42310(0); and E. Portable engines and/or equipment ass~iated with such engines qualifying for and complying with CAR B's stalewide registration sysaem (CIl & SC, Section 41753). I1. A~ d_.d.itlon~l Neither m'~ Autl~or[ty to Conslruct nor a Pen'nit to Operate shall be required for the following unless a wrilten permit is specifically requested by the owner/operator: A. Combustion Equipment 1. Steam generalors, steam superheaters, water boilers, water heaters, steam clemxers, and closed heat transfer systems with a total burner(s) maximum input heat rating of less than 5,000,000 Btu per hour (gross) and equipped 1o be fired exeluslvely with natural gag, liquefied petroleum gas, or any combination thereof, provided the fi~el contains no more llmn 5 percent I~y weight hydrocarbons heavier titan butan~ (as determined by test merited ASTM E-260-73) and no more than 0.30 groins of total sul fur per 100 standard cubic feet of gas (as detemfined by.t~t method ASTM D-107240); 2. Piston-type internal combustion engines with a manufacturer's maximum contlm~ous rating of 50 brake horsepower (bhp) or Jess; and 3. Oas turbine engines with a maximum heat input rating of 3,000,000 B(u per hour or Jess at ISO Standard Day ('.onditions. B. Vehicles Locomotives, airplanes, and watemraR used to tm~spt~rt ~ssengers or freight. This exemption is not intended to apply to equipment used for dredging of waterways or to ~quipmcnt used in pile driving adjacent to or in walorways. C. (.ooling Towers Except as req uJ red by Rule 429.1, water cooling towers with a circulation rate of less than 1,000 gallons/nfinute and not used ibr cooling liquids containing volatile organic compounds sucl~ as process water, water from barometric jets, or water from barometric condenSOl'S. D. Printing and Reproduction Equipment Printing, coating, or laminating fi~cilities using less than 2 gallons per day of graphic ads materials. Oraphic ads materials are any ink, coating, adhesive, fountain solulion, http ://www. ntb. ce.go vii ) R I')B fK E R lC t. IR I ITM ! ,/R202. l ¥1'M 6/27/2001 ~JUN-2?-O! WED 12:02 PH F~qX NO. P. 05/19 thinner, retarder, or cleaning solution. ~. Food Procossin~ 1. Mixers and blenders used in bakeries producing edible foodstuffs intended for human consumption. Ovc~is at bakeries wilh total production less than 1,000 po[mds o~product per operating day it'exempted by Sul~s~lion II.A. 1 ,, and if other thm~ electrically heated; and 2.Smokehouses used lbr pm~ring Ibod with a m~imum horizontal inside cross-sectional area not exceeding 20 square feet. F. Pl~qtic~ttb~r Processing Soume operations used exclusively rot e~truding or compression molding of robber produces or plastics, il'no phtsticizer or blowhlg agent is present, O. Storage Vessels Containers, msemoim, or tanks used ~xclusively for; 1. Storage ofoil ~dth specific gravity or0.8762 or higher (30° APl or lower) as measured by test method APl 2547 or ASTM I)-1298-80 ~th a capacity of 100 bbl or less; 2. Storage o~unheafed organic materlal with a capacity or250 gallons or less; 3. Storage of unhealed organic material wilh an initial boiling point of 150'C (302°F) or greater as measured by tesl methmt ASTM D-86; 0.9042 gravity or 4. Storage o[fi~el oils or non-air-filown ~sphalt wilh . s~ific Ifighcr (25° APl or lower) as me~csured by Lest method APl 2547 or ASTM D-1298-80; 5. 8lei'age or petrolemn distillates u~ ns motor fuel ~th 0.8251 speci tic gravity or higher (40° APl or lowcO as nteasured b7 trot method AP12547 or ASTM D-1298-80 and wiflt a ctq~aeity or 19,800 gallon (471 bbls) or less; 6.S(orage of relined lubrieatit~g oils; 7.Storage of liquefied gases h~ unvented (except IBr emergency reliol) pressure vessels; 8. Transporting of materials on streets or highways. lt. Loading Racks and l'kluipmcnt Loading racks (as dclincd in Rule 102) used exclusively for transfer of: 1. Unh~at~l orgtttlic materials ~th an initial boiling point of 150~C (302°F) or measured by test method ASTM D-86; 2. Fuel oil with 0,8251 s~,eific gravity or higher (40°~I or loweO as measured by test method APl 2547 or ARTM I')q29g-80; 3. Crude oil, asphalt, or residual oil From tanks not requiring ~nni~ in accordance with this Rule; 4. Crude oil witll 0.8762 spcmifie gravity or higher (30°API or lowe0 as measur~ by test method APl 2547 or ASTM D- 1298-80; 5, Crude oil, asphalt, or residual oil from a delivery velfielu iCloading equipment is athached to such vehicle; and 6. Retinal lubricating oil. 1. Surface Coating and Solvent (,leaning Ol~rntions I, Equipment used l~}r applicnlion of archiloctural aurlhee coatings. Architeelural surface coating is defined as troy coating applied to stationary structures and their appurtenances, to mobile hame~, tn parchments, or to curbs. 2.Unheated, non-convcytn'ized cleaning equipment (not including omi~gion control enclosures): a. with an open surfi~ce area of I0.0 ~2 or less, and internal volume of 92.5 gallons or less; b. using only organic solvents with mi initial boiling point or 120°C (248°I:) or greater as determined by AS'i'M 1078-78; and e. located at a statiomtry source losing less than 25 gallons of solvent per year to the almosphere fi'om itll such equipment at the stationa~ source, Solvent lost shall not htlp://www.n th.ce.go vfD RD B/K I~; R/(:U R l 1' I'MI ,/R202.} ITM 6/27/200 ] ~JUN-27-01 WED 12:02 PH F'~X Ho. include solvent recycled or disposed of properly. Any person claiming exemption pursuant to this subsection shall malnlain adequate mon~ly records to document his exempt stales. J. Misccllaneotm 1. Brazing, soldering, or welding aquigme~t. This exemption applies to conventional brazing, soldering, or welding opemt'ions only; any internal combustion engine or other equipment associated wifl~ these operations that would otherwise require permits is not exempt. 2. Eq.pui ment used. ..exelusivel. y 1o compress:, or hold dry. natural .... gas; m~y engine or other eqmpment ~soemt~ w~fl~ such operations olhe~tso reqmnng penmts ~s not exempt. 3. Fugitive emissio~,s sources, such as valves and flm~ges, associaled with a sour~ operation exempt from permit, . 4. Unrented (except for emergency pre~um rehe0 p~ssure vessels associated with a source operation exempt from permit. 5. Fugitive emissions sources m~d pressure vessels assoeiat~ with a sonrce operation requiring a permil shall be included on such pennit. A separate permit fi~r the fugitive source or pressure vessels shall not ~ required, 6. Source operation operatt, d at one s~ationm~ source for not ~nore than 45 days, which is not a retflacument Iora spec~ fie apph~tton which h~sts or is intend~t lo last for mom tlaan 45 days at one slationary source, and which emim less than two tons per year offany air contaminant. To qualify Ibr tlais exemption, a written request slmll be made to Control O fl]eer including: identifimation o F the Source operation, documentation emissions will not exceed two tons per year of any air contaminant, and proposed fOrm and location ofreeordq to bo used to verify qualification for exemplion. If the Control Officer does not respond to such request ~thin 30 days, it shall be deemed approved. To retain such exemption, tl~e owner of a sour~ operalion shall reapply biannual ly. ~ch request R~r exemplion or mapplieation shall be accompanied by a $1 ~ filing 7. Comfort air conditioning or comfort venlilaling systems not designed to remove air conlnminants generated by or released from a source operation. ~ 8. Any sour~ operation il'the uncontrolled emission o~any air contaminant, except Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds, is not expected to exceed 2 pounds in any 24-hour period; or 9. Other sources of nit cont~inanls for which an exemption is requested in writing, and which have been documenled with a ~itlen an~ysis by lho Control Oflicer a. emit no more than 10 pounds uncontrolled in any 24 hour period, b. emit no more than 180 pounds in any qua~er, mid c. not interibre wSth provisions of the newest adopted Air Quality Attainmenl Plan. Ill. Provisions for Permitting Otherwise Exempt Equipment Notwithstanding provisions of Section II. an Aulhorily to Construct m~d a Pm-mit to Operate shall tx: required for tho l'ollowiltg ,source operalions: A. Those subject to EPA 40 (:FR, Part 60, New Source Pcrfom]ancc Standards (NSPS), or EPA 40 CFR, Part 61, National Emission Standards for ! [azardous Air Pollutanls (NF~STIAPS); B. Those lbr whicl~ tim fJonlml Ofi]cer makes a delem~ination a permit shall be required because such source operation olay trot operate in compliance with all district roles and regulations; or C, Those proposed as part ot'~oil or groundwater rcmediatJ!m projecls. IV. .R..e.c. ord!ceeping h ttp://www.arb.ca.gov/Dl{ 1)11/K I,~R/CURI 1TML/R202,} [TM 6/27/2001 ~JUN-2?-O] WED 12:03 Pli FRX NO. P, 07/19 Rceordkeeping shall be ]XXlUh'ed to veri fy or maintain any exemption il' such exemption is b~used on a maximum daily emission ]imitation. http://www.a rb.ca, go v/DR D B/K I';R/C U RHTMI ,/R202.1 ITM 6~7/2001 'JUN-27-01 WED 12:03 PH FAX NO, P, 08/19 Wood l)re.~erv,qfion is the pro.~.~.~'c; or lhermal impreg~miion of cl~emieals inlo wood lo provide eflketivo iong-tel'm ]'osislanco to ollack by Ihngi, bacteria, insects, ftl~d marble borers, ~y extending se~ce life of timber product~, wood preservation reduces the need ~or honest of already ~lms~d tbres/ry resources, ~'t~uecs opemling cosls in i~ltlt~slri~,~ S~I~ OS ~lililies a~t] rnilroad~, and ensure.~ snf~ working conditions whm'e limbers are u~d as support strut/arcs. S~venty-five percent of the wood lrcatm~nt plm~ls in Ihe United Stales m'o concentrated in distincl ~gions, One oFthes~ regions exlc~tls From easl Tcx~s Io Mmyland~ corresponding roughly to Ibc natural range ofsoulhern pines, which is the major species uliliz~d. Tho se, coati, smallor region is along l'a~ifio coast, whcro Douglas fir and weslern md ~eclar am Ih~ p~domimmt species. The remaining 25 p~rc~nt of wood Ire~lmonl planls ar~ sc;~li~rod throughollt Ih~ United Slal~s. 10.8.1 Pm~ess DosCription~'9 I 0.g.i.l Pmse~afiws - Them ar~ two general ~lassos el'wood pmse~a/ives: oils, such as creosote ~nd p~trol~um solutions ofpenlachlorophcnol; and walcrhorno salts thai n~' ~pplied as waler solulions. Tim ~flbclivuness office I, csg~watiws varies greally nod can tkp~nd not only upon its ~omposilion, but ,Iso upon tim q~mlity injected into lilt wood, the deptl~ ofponetl~tion, and Ib~ condition~ Io which lhe treated ~lcriltl is ~xpos~d in 10.8. l.2 Conditioning- Wilh most wood Ircaling methods, siD~ifieant amo~mls of free waler in Iho w~d coil cavilics may slow or prevent the eob'ante ol'ihe preservative chmnical, Therefore, wood moisture ~nlent mtlst be reduccd prior to Ircatmeul..Moisture reduction can be accomplished by using ani ficinl conditioning lmalmcnts or by air-seasoning (i.e., storing Ibc untreated wood outdoo~'s in piles). Unseasoned wood that is exposed to Ihe opc~ air generally dales slowly until it comes into appmxi,,ale equilibrium wi~h 1he relative hmnidity oflhe air, l lowcvcq some wood species will rot bclbre the air drying is complete. B~auac certain wolff species will roi before ,ir d~ing can be compleled in some climt~les, wood aflifi~:ially conditioned by oeo of three primat~ methods; (1) steamin~-nnd-vacuum, (2) boiling-tmder- vactlmn (commonly referred lo as Ibc BouJlon process), nnd (3) kiln d~ing, Vnp,r d~ing also has b~n ~med bul currently is used rarely, if ever, '1 hose cot~ditioni~tg tmalmcs~ remove a subslantial amount of moism~'e fi'on~ lht~ wood and ~ls- h~t lbo wood to a more raw, robie Irenling tcmperaluro. Steaming and Boultonizlng have tim added ellbct ofdisinfccling the wood. In segreg~lc-d systems, conditioning is pcrfonn~ in sepnrnle "clean" cylinders ll~at do not conlnin presc~aliv'o, Thc stem~ing and vacuum mell~od el' conditioning is used prinmdly for Ireating ~uthcm pine poles. Stetm'~ing m~d vacuum amy he pc~om~cd in a dedicated cylinder or iu the same cylinder u~d for lreafing wood. h~ this process, ibc wood clmrtzc is be;~led with live sleam. Then, a vaouum is drn~. The Boullon process is used primarily tbr Douglas fir and hardwoods. Thc Boulton process usually is performed i~z Ihe ~qmo cylinder ~sc~.l Io treat fha wood, In tl~is process, Ihe cylinder is charged witl~ wood, nnd l)cal~d prcselwative is used to heal Iht wood ch~lrge for I to 24 hours. At that point, a vacuum is drawls. Finally, Iht prcs~valiv~ is ri, turned to thc work lank, Tiffs step is refen'ed to as "blow back" fronl practice of tlsi~)B COml)m~sed ~ir Io blew 1he prcst~ativc b,ek into Ibc wol~ tank, However, many Ircatment 8/99 Wood Pix~(llmls Indusit~ 10.8-1 'JUN-27-01 ~ED 12:03 PN FhX NO. P, 09/]9 sys~.ell~S ~,t,~¢ l'mmps lo will~dr:lw preservative fi'om lite lrealmenl cyliuder and reh,-n it Io the work tank. Allhough socl~ syslems do not actually blmv back lhe prcservalive, lhe lenn mill is used 1o refer to Ihis step II~e process. 10.8.1.3 Treating ~ Most wood-preserving methods may be classified as eifimr i)ressuro processes, in which the wood is placed in a trealing cylinder or rclotl ;md impmgnalcd with prcse~xal[ve under considerable force, and noiq~rcssuro processes, which do nol involve the use orindueed pressure. Nonprcssure pmces~s call be classified as fllcnnal processes,/11 wt~ich heat is applied, and nonthennal processes, such as brushing, spraying, dipping, nmi soaking. Non?ressum processes generally are used only wi~h Oilbome prcse~xatives. Beertus¢ Ihe mr0oriW of wand Irealed ammally is impregnated by pressure methods in closed cylinders, only pressure processes are discussed hi the followhlg sections. Pressure processes operate on Ihe ~ame ~enm'al principle, though they may diffc, in lhe specifies of the pro~ss. The trealmcnl is carried out in steel eylindem or retofls. Most units confrmn Io sJ7~ limits of 2 lo 3 meters tm) (6 to 9 feet [all in diameter and up lo 46 m (I 50 fl) or more in length, and are built wilhgtand win'king pressures up lo 1,720 kilopascals epa) (250 pounds per square inch [psi]). ~e wood loaded on special ~rmn cars and moved into lhe term% which is limn closed and filled wilh pre~afive. Applied pressure for~s prcse~afives inlo the womt until tim desired amount has been absor~d. procmses, the fifil-celi, modified fidl-ccll, m~d empty~cll, are in common use. 'l]mse processes am distlnguish~ by tim sequence i~l which vacuunl and pressure am applied to lhe mm~. qbe lcnns "empty' and "fiftY' m for lo the level o~pmse~ativc rclained in the wood cells. Thc fifll-ccll process achieves a high level or retention ol~preservativc in thc wood cells, bul less penetration than lhu empty-cell pr~ess, and lbo c~pty- cell process achieves mlmivcly deep penetrafiou with less preservalive ~lenlion than does the fifll- cell process. Full-Cell Procesa- The full-cell (Bethel) pmces~ is used ~l~en maxinlm~ preservative rctcnlion levels are desired, ~uch :q when treating timbers wilh croo~ole r~r proled]on against marine borem. Figure 10.8-1 presents a flow diagram for tho tifll-cell pressure lrealillg process. In addition m creo,~ote, Ihe full-cell pr~ess also is used primarily wJlh waterborne pre,servalJw~s. 3lin fifll-eell process steps am Ii,sled below: 1. The charge of wood is sealed in Ihe treating cylinder, and an initial va¢umn is applied approximately l~alran hour to remove as much air as possible from lbo wood and fi'om the cylinder; 2. The prvserw~tive, ehl~ur healed or at ambient lempemture depeuding on the system, enlers the cylinder without breaking Iho vacuum; 3. After the cylinder is filled, the cylinder is pre~qurized unlil no more preservative will"e~lcr the worst or until the desired prcsesxa~ivo retention is obtained; 4. At lbo end of the pressure period, lhe pressure is released, and Ihe preservative Js mlnoved t~om lhc cylinder; and 5. A final vacuum may be applied lo remove lhe exce~s prcsemaiive thru would olhc~se drip Ihe wood. Ir the wood is steam-condilioned, the preservative is inlrodueed alter fl~e vammm period l~llowlng steaming. In xegregalcd systems, lhe slcam conditioning and preservative application slops are conducted in I 0.8-2 EMISSION FACTORS 8/99 ~UN-2?-01 NED 12:04 PM FAX NO, P. 10/19 separate cylh~dcrs. Tile I'hl:d ~lcps in lhe process arc: the unioadh~g oft]la retort and storage orlbc treated WOOd. Modi fled F~ll-Cell Process The n~odi ficd fid[~ell pl'oc~ ~eneml[y i~ ~,sed for Ihe application ofwalerbome prese~a(lws. This medmd is sinfilar to the fidl-cc[I process except lbr ibc initial vacmln~ levels. Thc modified full-e~ll process uses less vacuum than lhc fi~ll cell; the vacuum levels arc determined by Ihe wood species being treated and Ihe preservative retention lewis desivedl. The Ilow diagram shown i~l Figure 10.8-1 also cbanwteriz~s the modified kdi-cell pressure treating pm~'ess. Empty-Cell Process- Tho cmply-ocll process obtni,s deep pieservalive penetration with a relalively low net preservative retention level. If oil preservalives are used, the elnply~ell process mosl likely will be used, provided it will yield Ihe desired mteulion level. 'lbo Rueping process and Ibc l,owt~ process am the ~wo most commonly tlqed empty-cell pmct'ssc~. Botll line compressed air to drive mit a pop, ion of lbo preset~atlve absorbit during lhc pressure period. Figure I 0.8-2 presenls, a flow diagram For Ihe empty-cell pressure treating process. In d~e Rueping process, compressed air is tom~ into file Imaling ~linder containing die charge of wood to fill the w~d cells with air prior Io preservative i~Oe~im~. Pre.~surizalioa times va~ Mlh wood species, For some speoi~q only a few minutes ofpressuri~lion are required, wlfile mom resistant ~pecies may require pressure periods ol'l?om 30 minutes Io I hour. Air pre,utes used typically range from 172 Io 690 kPa (25 Io 100 psi) depending on lbo nel preservative relenlion desired and the resislance of the wood. After Iho inltial prexsufizalio~l period, preseiwrdivo is pumped into Ibc ~linder. As tho presetwative el~lers lbo trealing cylinder, the air escapes into an equallzing or Rueping tank at a rote which mainlalns the pressur¢ wilhin the cylinder. When ll~e Ireadng cylimk~ is filled wilh preselwative, lbo pressure is raised above flint orth0'inltlal air mut maintained until the wood will take no mom preservative or until m~ough has becel absorbed lo I~ave the desired preservative mtcnlion level a[ler Ihe final vacuum, A tier the pressu~' pcrlod, the i~x~se~ative mmov~ fi'om lbo wood wilh a final vacuum. This fiual vacuum may recover From 20 1o 60 pcment of the ~'o~s ammmt or pmscwative it[jccled. The I'clofl then is unloaded, and the Imalcd wood stored. Th~ I.,ow}~ process is an eh[ply-cell process wilhout t]~o initial air pressure Prcso~adve is pumped , inlo tho treating cylinder wilhout either an inilial air pressurization or vacuum, trapping Ihe air that is already in the wood. After the. ~linder is filled wid~ tht~ pr~eiwatjve, pressure is applied and tho remainder otlhe process is identical The advantage orlhe.l,ow~ process is lhnl lhll-oell equipment can tm used wifl~out ll~e accessories requi~'d by the R~eping process, sudl as an air cmhpressor, an extra tank for lhe prese~adve, or a pump Io lbm'e tl~c preservative inlo the cylinder against the air pressure. 1 lowcver, bofl~ processes are us~ widely and sncccssfid ly. 8/99 Woad Products Induslry 10.8-3 'JUN-27-O1 NED 12:04 PM FAX NO. P. 11/19 I O. g, 2 Em { ssious2-'~ d~,O~ I ? For walcrbome preservabvc~, emissions fixm~ wood pmservh~g procosses ~mmrally are not sig~fil~cant, For o~lborn~ presc, rvafivc,% Ihe prh)m~ sore-cos of emission8 [rom wood prexe~wafion processes arc (I) Ih~ Ireated charge in m~edlately after removal Ii'mn Iht rfc, sting cylh~dcr, (2) lbo vaamm syslem (cm~dilionin~ cycle m~d final vacuum cycle), and (3~ d~splaccd air fi'om workh~g lank blow backs. The two process e, nission poims ore Ihe work tank vcnl and Ihe vacm,n system. Figures 10.8-1 and 10.8-2 identify which process slops ara associated with emissions from these lwo process emisskm points. Tahle 10.8-1 prcsenls emission ~tcl~rs for ?rgallic pollutant emissions l~om creosote wood presaging. Table 10.8-2 presents emission feelers Ibr inorganic pnllulant e~'nissions fi'om chromaled copper fl~¢llat¢ wood pl~serving. The elevated temperalum of the trcaled charge wlien it is pulled fi~m lhe cylinder causes some office lower boili~lg point organic co~llpotmds IO volatilize as aerosols, forming a white emission plume typically dissipates wilhin a t~w Volatile organ[o compound emissions include those organic compounds present in the wood that released when healed during condilio~fing and lmalmenl, and Iht polycTclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAlls) flint am evaporated from tim creosolc solution and removed t)om thc retort through fl~e vacuum system during the Boullon (boiling-umler-vacuum) process and dmSng the final vactmm applied dttring lbo Rueplng process. Crcosole emissions can be eslimated as llle sum of the emissious of the PAlls. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocafl)mm am included in file class ofcomponnds referred to as polyeyclie organic matter (POM), which is lisled as a l~ardous air pollutant in Ibc Clean Air Act. l]m emission point for Iht steaming a~ld vacuum nlclhod et'conditioning is the vacuum pull~p system vc~ll. Vacuum systems include condensem, wldeh are considered pa~ office process equipment slid not separale cmlssion coi~tro[ devices, The cqnisslo!l poinls for the l]otlllon process am the gacutlm pump vent during ~l~e vaetmm stage of the conditioning procemq and thc work tank vent during the blow back or pr<:se~ative withdrawal stage of the condi~loning Working lank blow backs also occur at lhe end ora preservative lmaiment cycle when Ihe Ir~ting s~dullon is relumcd to the wo~k lank. '[]m air di~plac~ hy Ih¢ retnming solulion is vented via a control device to the atmosphcw, la some systems, tl~e displaced air in lhe work tank is vented back into thc treatmcnl cylinder to fill the head space created as the prese~watlve is withdrawn ii'om the cylinder. In such systems, II,em are no emissions a~ocialed with blow backs, A problem may arise when the quanlity prusc~ative heing blown back is not monitored closely anti air begins lo blow up through tim work tank. Volatile compounds am picked up by Ihe air as it bubbles up ll~rough the treating solnlimi and are carried out through file tank velll. Fugitive c~l~i~sio~ls o[various preservative constit,ents may occur alter the treated wood is removed from Ihe fermi. The fi~gilive enfission rate is a function el'the vapor pressure, which is driven by temperalm'c. Emission tales t~re greatesl immediately ;~fler lhe wood is removed fi'om the m~orl and generally decline alterward. Rel~rence 16 describes a mclbod rot estimating fi~giliva emissions from cmoS°teztmated wood ~lorage as a Ihnetion el'time, leml~crature, and tim el/~cfive surhce area oflhe lmated wood. Additional in Formation ami t~ discussion arrant method can be Found in Reft'fence 17, M~ich is the background report for Ibis A P-42 seclion, l lowever, in thc absence of a reliable me~od for estimating the eftkctivc surhce area, that method is not pmsenled in this AP-42 section. in additio~l Io Ib¢ fl~ree primmy process emission sourccs~ emissio~ls are generated from waste water trealmcnt and o~ganie liquid storage tin,kg. Oilbornc wood lrealmcnt plants fi'equenlly have onsile waste waler treatment fi~ciliiies designed to sepan~le organic materials fi'om the waste waler generated during the 10.8.4 [.'.MISSION FACTORS 8/99 · JUN-27-01 WED 12:05 PM FAX NO, P. 12/19 Irealing process. This \¥;~.~lcWalcr h'cttBl~clll J.s a potential stun'cc of V()C ami IlAP ~mission~. Enfis~ion Factors for wasle water [rcahBclll ~o~ll'ccs are pres('nled in AP-42 Section 4.3, Waslc Water (.~llcctmn, TrcahncnL And Storage. l,iq,fi~i ~(at-agc looks tbr the various preservalive~ arc al~o sources oJ'VOC and HAPs. lhnissJan~ fi'om these storage looks am covered in A 1'-42 ('haptcr 7, I ,i~lnid STorage Tanks. 10.~,3 Controls~'10'12 There arc few oplions for controlling JhBitjw emia~ion ]o~cs from lreat~d charge. Conslrucling a ventihtJon hood to co]lccl V~ emanating from the frcsl~ly lrcal~'d charge is economically infe~ible due to thc size of the hood needed for covt~ring Ihe cylinder end and drip pad. Thc c~cel iveness of conlmlling emissions by using water to cool freshly h~aled wood by spraying or quencl~i~g is quesl ionablc. A prima~ drawback lo water quencll syslems is that ll~e conlamhunl[ is merely transferred to water, resulting in thc need R~r an effluent Ircahncnt system. In addition, water quench systems generate significant amounts of waste water, wltieh inclnde listed hazardous substances, and, thu~, is not desirable. A 1993 su~ey of 97 woo~l preserving Ihcilities tbund that at least qight facilities used wel scrubbers for controlling emissions fi'om crcomle w~d preseming; use of both vcnturi scrubbers and packed-bed scrubbers was repmled. One fi~c~l/ly also reposed uslng a packed-bed ~n~bbcr [o control VOC emissions I¥om a PCP wood preserving process~ At leasl two creosote hcilities used condeasers and one fi~cility used an incJncralor Io control VOC emissiol~s from crco~olc wood preselMng, l]~e ~x'mllL~ o~ one emissJol~s lest the incinemlor-cnntrollcd lhcility iadicat~ a VOC con{roi efficiency of mom than 99 pement for the Boulton process and firsl blawback. None el' thc wood p]vserving hcilities cun'cntly in operation u~ incineration emission control. A ~ew facilities cnntrol emissions IYom creosote wood pmsc~ing processes by means ora kllock-eut I~111[ fi~ilowed b7 a venturl scrubber. Thc u'sulLq of an emission test on such a SySlelll indicated a VOC control efllciency or 75 percenh OdoroUs emissions Crom Ibc steam jet vacuum syslem surest that a sh~gle-pmqs condenser may tm[ condense all of Ibc organics in tlm exlmusl. One option for correctin~ this problem is to install a larger conden.qcr capable orfilrlher reducing ~]¢ or~mic co~tcnt in Iht va~r. A properly sized condenser with adequate cooling walcr will condense virtually all of Iht organics i~ the cxhausl Another option is Io modify the vacuum syslcm m inch]de Iwo ~lemn jet ejectors in series with a barometric (direct contact) i~ltcrcondmlscr bclween Ihem. In this systcm~ Ihe haromelfic intercondcnsers condense the oily vapors in Ibc steam ami remove ll)u~n with lhe intercondensed water, A d~ird option is to replace the steam jet ejectors wilh a vacuuln pulnp and duct tile c~haust vapors to an activated carbon adso~lion syslcm or to an aRcrburner, Bolh arc cl~cicnt means for rclllovi~lg organic compounds from Ihe exhaust gas. Working tank blow back vapurs can be controlled by,bubbling the vapors fl3rough walcr or through a water spray heft)re venting to iht atlnosphcrc. I Iowever, Ihe eflkctiveness of these syslcms will (lclerio~le if thc water is allow[,d to reach saturation and is nm chmlg~d p¢fimtically. Anofl~er option for controlling Ihesc vapors is lo inc/nerale l}lCll~ it) a~ afterburner along wilh thc vacuuln ~yslem exhaust. However, incinemlars m~ not in usc currently at any domestic wood preserving l~milides. 8/99 Wood P,'oducls lndu,slry 10,8-5 'JUN-27-OI NED 12:05 PH FAX NO. P. 13/19 PO,.TS ~l ,~,,. // T^N~/ ®; ]1u ..... J'~ ..........., ..*---,.!® ~ PROCESS STEPS [ RECEIVING AND I / VACUUM I VACUUM , [ PRESERVATIVE J "--/ FILLING/ PRESERVArmVt ] p~E~URE INJECTION ["[ PRESERVA'rlV~ I RE l UHN 30 WORK TANK STFAMING ~ VACUUM .. j ~ WORK TANK E MISSION8 ~ VACUUM SY~IFM F~ISSIONS _{ . ~ ...... II)Gl ~IVE VOC AND PM TREATED WOOD ~ ~ OTHER VOC [~IS81ON POINT VA UNLOADING ~D . J STORAGE NO l E' PI,~OCESS [~tS8ION POINT~ ARE ~HE WORK ~ANK VENT ANO VACUUM SYSTEM. Figure: I0.§-1, Flow diagram ol'tl~e fidl-ccll and modified full-cell prc,ssurc trcafit)g processes. 10.8-6 F.M IS,~ION FACTOR S 8/99 'JU~-2?-O1 WED 12:06 PH FAX NO. P. 14/19 EMISSION . POINTS [, ,. ! .... I WORz : IL ........ I t ~ . ~ ~® a'~ ~[ YARD ................ ~L[~' Z~ f PROCESS STEPS ' ... ~ R~C¢IVING~ f ' ,SEASONING] I" I ' ' t FILLIN~ / PRESERVATIVE PRESSURI~ L INJECTION RETURN TO WORK TANK SI EAMING ~--L VACUUM (~ WORK TANK EMISSION8 ~ VACUUM SYSTEM I ~ ~ ~O, TNTIAL SOURC~ OF VACUUM ..... 3 . . ~ O] HE R VOC.EMIS~ION pOINT NOTE: PROCESS ~ MISSION POINTS ARE THE WORK TANK VENT ANO VACUUM SYSTEM. FiB. utc 10.8-2, Flow din~mm ~or thc crop[y-cell i)rcs~,zrc Ircatin[ process. ~/99 Wood l)rod~c(s Industry ]0.~-7 -JUN-27-O! ~ED 12:06 P~ FhX NO, P. 15/19 TABI',E 10.8.-1 liMISSIC N FA('TORS FOR ('RF, OSO'I E EMPTY-CEI~I, WOOl) PRU, SERV1N(J EMi SSi()N FACFOR RA'I' lNG: Process CASRN Pollulant Emission Factor 'rrealmcn~ cycle without conditio~sing, VOCb 7.4 x ! 0'4 tm¢ontmllcd ¢IllJSSJOII~ (SC'C: 3-07-005-30) 83-32-9 Acenaphthcn~ 6.3 x 10-7 (IncJudos sl¢ps i'{, C, alJd I) shown ill 2()~.96-~ Acoll~phlhyJone 1.7 x ~ 0.6 Figuru 10.8-2) 120-12,7 Ai]lhraceno 1.6 x 56.55-3 ' Bonzo(a)amhracene 1,7 x 205-99-2 [{ell7o(b)fluoranlhe~l~ J.6 x J0-8 207-08-9 [{cnzo(k)fltloranlhonc 6.0 x lO 50-32-~ B¢]]zo(~)pyrcne 8.2 ~ 10.9 86,74-~ Ca rbazole 3.6 x I 0-7 21 ~.0 ! -9 Cl~rysene ~.4 x 10.9 132-64-9 [)il~en7ofuran 1 206..44-0 Fluoranlh~n~ 8.6 x 10.8 ~6-73-7 Fluorene 7.8 x 91-20-3 Naphfl]alcne 4.6 x 10.6 85-01-8 Phmanthre~o 2.8 x 10.7 129-00-0 Pyrcne 7.3 x 10-8 Tr~almcnt *yclo wilh condilioni,~g by VOCh 5.8 x 10.3 Boulmn process, unconl~'ollod emissions (SCC: 3-~7.005~40) 83-32-9 Acenaphfllen~ 9.9 x 10,6 (Includ~s meps A, B, C, ~md D shn~a~ in 208-96-8 : Acenaphthylene 2.8 x 10 FiE. uro 10.8.2) 120-12-7 Anthraeene 1.3 x 10,7 56~55-3 ~ Bonzo(a)anthracenc 1.3 x 10`7 : 205-99-2 Bcnzo(b)fluoranth~ne 1.3 x I 0'7 207-0~-9 : Bonzo(k)fluomnfl~cnc 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrt-ne 6.5 x ~6-74-8 Cntbazole 2~9 x 10-6 218-0 I-9 ! Chryseno 6.7 x 10'~ 132.64-9 ' Dibenzofumn 3.5 x l0'~ 204.44-0 Fluoramheno 6.g x 10.7 ~6-73-7 Fluorcne 3.9 x 10.6 91.20~3 Naphllmlene ~.9 x 10.5 85-0 I-g' Phcnanlhrcne 1.9 x 129-00-0 Pyrenc 10,g-8 EMISSION FAC'J'ORS 8/99 ~JUN-27-O1 WED 12:06 PM Ffi× NO.' P. 16/19 Tah!e lO.~-I (cont.). Refercncea 12 and 16, axcep! wlaer¢ nolecl. Vat, toes a~ in u~ils of pounds per cubic fool (lb/Vt3) of wood Irealt'd. To convel5 Io kilogmm~ per cubit~ meier (k~m3), m~diiply by 16. CASRN =- Chemical Abstract Services R~'gisiry Number. SCC ~* source classi ficalion code, Reffronc~ I 0 and 16. Volatile orga~fie COml~OUmt,s as propane, based on Melhod 25A lest result. 8/99 Wood I"rtxlucls Industs3t 10.8-9 'JUN-2?-O1 WED 12:06 PM FaX NO. P, 17/19 Table 10.8-2. I.;M. ISSION FACTOI{S I:()R 1NOI~.GANIC I'OLI.I/TANT EMI.qSIONS FROM CI IROMATEI ) Cf)PPI:.R AP,,qE'NATF I:.M P'[ Y,CELI, W(X)I) PRESERVIN(_ia EMISSION FACT()R. P, ATING: E Source CASRN Name Emission Factor Treatment cycl~ with conditioning, 7440.47,3 Chromium 1.4 x 10'° unconh'olled emissior~s 7440~50-8 Copper 1,9 x 10'9 (SCC 3-07-005-43) a Reference I 1. Includes emission fi'om mlificial conditioning cycle and final vacuum only, ~--~ Fac!,~rs represent uncontrolled emissions. Emissi<m factor units are pounds per cubic foot (lb/it3) orwood treated, To convert lo kilograms per cubic meter (kg/nra), multiply by 16, CASRN ~ Chemical Abslract Services P, egistry Number. SCC = Source Classification Code. I 0,8- I 0 EMISSION FACTORS 8/99 ,JUN-27-O1 WED 12:07 PM F~× NO. P. 18/19 Rell3rences For Seclion iO.g !. ?7~e 1995 U"ood Prd, verl'bl&r lndusu3' i'roduc[ion S[u[islical ~epol'l, American Wood Pr~s¢~ers Inslilute, Vienna, VA, ~ ~ Scpl~mbcr 1996. 2. C.C. Vaught and R. I.. Nicholson, l~l'alualJon Of Emission ,9ources ~)'om Creosote HZood 7~eatmen/ 'Oper~#ion,~', EPAMS0/3-89-028, U. R. Environmenlal Proloction Agency, Research Triangle Park, Jtnle 19fi9. 3. EIc¢lronic communications (~qnail) I~om ~iek Bt~k, Kerr-Mc6¢¢ Chemical Cmpomlion, lO OcOrg¢ Parris, American Wood Preservers Inslilule, Sep/eml~r 17, 1998. 4. Amt~rlcan Wood-Pre.~'ervetw' As.~'ockMon Books Of .qtandard~', 1991. Anmricall Wood Asso¢iation, Woodslock, Mr), 1992. Written comm,niealion IYom Martin Wikslmm, American Wood P~sc~rs lnslitutc, Io Dallas Sari'let, U. S. Envirmm~cnial Proleclion Ageacy, Research Triangle Park, NC, Februa~ I g, 1994. 6. Wrilten communication from Gene Barflow, American Wood Prese~ws [nsfiR~te, Vienna, VA, lo Dallas Safi'iet, tl. S. Environmental Prolection Agency, Rcsemch Triangle Park, NC, January I0, 1997. 7. Wriuan commnniznfion fi'om Carlton I)c~es, Vulcan Chcnucals, Birmingham, AL, to Dallas Saltier, U. S. Envlronmcnlal I'rolc~lion Agency, R~ear¢h Triangle Park, NC, August 9, 1996. 8. Wood Preserving Re.,oltrce (" onSClq'Cllion And Recovery Act Compliance (bride, A Gltide To Federal E~vironmental Regulalion, EPA-305-B-96-001, U. 8. Envirom~lenlal Protection Ageney~ Washingtoll. D.C., June 1996. 9, Electronic communication (e-nmil) from George Pan'is, American Wood Pmse~ers Inslilute, to Richard Marinshaw, Midwesl Research Instimle, Scplember 17, 1998. 10. DJ'OJ~ lndtt, vt~vJ'rqfile, leelmical memotandmn fi'om B. Gatano, Research Triangle lnstitate, to Eugene Crumpler, ! J. 8. Environmental Protection Agency, Remmrcl~ Triangle Park, NC, August 2, 1993, 11. Wood Irealmcnl Phtnt Emis.~'ion 7L'slRtT~orl, Ket t -Mc'Gee Chemical Corporatton,/lvoca, Petm,wlvania, EMB Report 94-WDT-O I, U. S. Envimnmental Pro~ection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, Septumbcr 1994. 12. Ga.~'eolts Organic Cottll)Ottnd 1~SntX~ion ,¥llldg Nuphthalene Knock-Out Tmik ~t~d Water'Scrubber, Bb'ntfl,gltatn ~fiJog Inc., Warrior; Alabama, Aflk, dNignal, lac., April 12 and 13, 1994, TTI,, Inc.. Tuscaloosa, AL, May 199~. 13. I;7nol Emi. q',~ion J).ta Rei~rl.- ESnt~',viun 7bsling Proldrant At Koflper.~ .gtt?etfi~d Site, OroviIle. CA, prep:~red tbr U. S. Enviromncnlal Pro~ection Agcmcy, Region 1X, by Ebasco Semites, ]ncorporaled. December ! 989. ld. Ko/¥~ers btdttstries, lncotT~oratcd, l'it/sburgh, l'enn,9,h,anfa, Susqueham~a Wood ~'eoting Facilitie.~' Vacum. P.mp Emtssion.e ,q/mbq Chester Environmental, Pittsburgh, PA. April 1994. 8/99 Wood Products Industry 10,8~ 11 'JUN-2?-O1 WED 12:07 PH FhX NO. P. 19/19 15. t,'tq¥~er.~ lJtdtt.s, lrit~.,', Jncorl>orttl[.d, Orm,illc. C?I. ,-lB 258,~ I.;imL~'.~ion.¢ ?¥xt ?ro.~rtt#t, 'IL.st Dctr~ber 8 I[ll'Oll~t,r[I 12. 1990, Bcsl l.~nvimnmeulaL l layward, CA, No¥cmbcr 14, 1990. 16. ( itlcuhtt~'d Emissionx l')'m~l ('ret~.,otc-Trr.alod IFood Products (Cro.~x-Y'ie.$' And l'olcs). AquaAeTer, Brcntwood, TN, all{l American Wi~od lh'eservcrs laslilute, Vimlllfl, VA, Oclobcr 13, 1994. 17. Emi.~.sio~ Ft~ctor Doc,ntcntutiot} For ~P-42 ,g~,ctiot~ ]0.8, ~taoti Prexervh¥o,. Fi, ed Rept~rl, U. S. I;'.nvironmcnlal lh'oleelion Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, August 1999. 10.8-12 EMISSION FACTORS 8/99 /---/¢o/ooo (f_.$~..A C.Y'L,,,JOC--"c p~,'r' 1 ' Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED · (from HOURLY Obs) , Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) JANUARY - ALL HOURS I (KNOTS) I TOTAL I MEAN SPEED / 28'331 34'401 41 I >=56 IWIND PERCNT I SPEED N 7 2.6 1.6 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 6.2 NNE 3 1.6 .9 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 6.1 NE 6 2.7 1.0 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 5.6 ENE 8 33 .8 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1 5.1 E 1 I 53 1.9 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,1 54 ESE 9 44 1.2 .2 .1 .1 * 0 0 0 0 (~.9 59 SE 9 33 .8 .3 .2 .2 0 0 0 0 0 60 65 SSE 8 2 3 ,5 ,4 ,1 * 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 6 1 ~ 8 1 7 .5 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 29 49 SSW 6 1 2 ,2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 47 SW .7 1.4 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 49 WSW .7 1.7 .4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 49 W .8 2.7 .9 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 50 WNW .7 3,0 2,2 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 6,1 5 1 NW .8 3,3 2,5 ,7 ,1 * 0 0 0 0 0 7,6 § 9 NNW .6 2,5 1.8 ,7 ,1 * 0 0 0 0 0 5,8 7 2 VAR 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 0 ALL 11,8 43.1 17,5 3,8 ,7 .3 * 0 0 0 0 100 4.5 · = PERCENT < ,05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (fnom HOURLY Obs) (Cont.) FEBRUARY - ALL HOURS SPEED (KNOTS) TOTAL MEAN 16 PT. 1 ",1 4 - 61 7-101 11-16[ 17-211 22-271 28-331 34-40[ 41-47[ 48-551 >=56,PERCNT WIND SPEED N .7 3.1 2.7 .6 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 6.5 NNE .4 2.2 1.5 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 0.3 NE ,7 2,3 I 1 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,4 5,7 ENE .7 3,8 9 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,7 5,3 E 1.1 5.7 1 7 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 5.2 ~:SE 1.0 4.4 I 0 .4 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 6.0 SE .7 2.8 9 .3 .3 .1 * 0 0 0 0 5.4 7.0 SSE .6 1.8 6 ~.5 .2 * * 0 0 0 0 3.8 6.9 S .8 1.4 5 .1 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 5.2 SSW 4 .9 ~ * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I. 5 5.2 SW O 1.3 3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 5,1 WSW 5 I .6 4 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 5.2 W I 0 2,3 9 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,1 5,2 WNW 6 2.7 2 0 .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 6.4 NW § 3.2 2 8 .9 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 7.9 7.5 NNW § 3.1 2 7 1.1 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 7.8 7.6 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.7 0 ALL 11.0 42.7 20.2 4.9 1.3 .2 ,1 0 0 0 0 100 5.0 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont.) MARCH - ALL HOURS I TOTAL IMEAN SPEED -331 34 KNOTS) - 401 41 N .6 3.g 3.5 1.0 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 8.7 7 0 NNE .3 1.8 I .9 .4 * * 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 7 3 NE .5 2.2 .8 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 5 9 ENE .5 3.6 '.9 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.2 5 3 E 1.1 4.7 1.4 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 5 1 ESE ,8 4.1 1.0 .3 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 6.2 5 8 SE .7 2.7 .8 .3 .1 .1 * 0 0 0 0 4.9 6 5 SSE .4 1.8 .5 .3 .1 .1 * * 0 0 0 3.3 7 2 S .§ 1.3 .4 .1 .1 * 0 O- 0 0 0 2.4 5.1 SSW .3 .9 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 5 1 SW .4 1,2 .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.9 5 5 WSW .5 1.6 .5 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 5 6 W .6 2.0 1.3 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.9 5 8 WNW .4 3.1 3.0 .g .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 7 1 NW .7 3.5 4.1 1.9 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 10.8 8 0 NNW .5 3.7 4.5 2.2 .2 .1 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 8 2 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 0 ALL 8.7 42.1 25.1 7.8 1,1 .4 * * 0 0 0 100 5.7 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) APRZL - ALL HOURS SPEED I KNOTS) TOTAL~ MEAN DIR. SPEED N .4 4.0 4.1 1.5 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 7 4 NNE .2 1.7 1.7 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 7 3 NE .3 1.5 .7 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.§ 6 2 ENE .3 2.4 .6 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 5 5 E .7 3.6 1.1 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 5 3 ESE .5 3.9 .8 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 5 3 SE .6 2.7 .6 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 5 6 SSE .5 1.6 ,4 .2 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 5 g S .4 I .0 .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 4 9 SSW ,1 ,7 ,2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,1 5 4 SW ,3 1,0 ,3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,6 5 8 WSW ,3 1,5 ,7 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,6 5,9 W .6 2.2 1.6 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 6.0 WNW ,5 3.1 4.5 1.5 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 9.7 7.7 NW .5 3.8 5.5 3.3 .4 .1 ' 0 0 0 0 0 15.0 8.8 NNW .4 4.1 5.9 3.3 .4' .1 * 0 0 0 0 14.5 8.§ VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.2 0 ALL 5.5 38.9 29.8 10.9 1.3 .2 * 0 0 0 0 100 6.3 · = PERCENT < .05 Fr quency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont.) MAY - ALL HOURS I I TOTAL I MEAN DIR. ISPEED N .4 3.4 4 3 1.6 * * 0 0 0 0 0 9.4 7.6 NNE .2 1.4 1 5 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 7.7 NE .2 1.2 6 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 6.4 ENE .2 1.4 3 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 5.6 E .5 2.1 6 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4.8 ESE .4 2,3 4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I 5 0 SE .3 2.4 5 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 5 5 SSE ,2 1.4 4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 I 5 4 S .3 .8 3 * * * 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 g SSW .2 .5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .9 5 0 SW .2 '.8 4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 4 6 0 WSW .2 1.4 8 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 6 0 W .5 2,2 2 3 .5 * '0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 6 7 WNW .4 3.0 5 3 2.5 .2 .1 0 0 0 0 0 11 4 8.5 NW .4 4.1 g 8 5.2 .4 .1 * 0 0 0 0 20 5 9.1 NNW .4 4.5 8.6 4.0 '.5' .1 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 8.7 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.2 0 ALL 4.9 32.9 36.0 14.4 1.2 .3 * 0 0 0 0 100 5.9 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) JUNE - ALL HOURS I SPEED :KNOTS) I TOTAL MEAN 16 PT, 1 - 3 - 61 7-101 11 IPERCNT WIND N 3 3,5 4,3 1,2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 g,O 7,4 NNE 1 I ,4 I ,1 ,2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,0 7,1 NE 2 I ,1 ,4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I .8 5.9 ENE 2 I ,2 .2 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,6 5,3 E 3 1 ,g .3 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 4,7 ESE 4 1,8 ,3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,6 4,9 SE 4 2,2 ,4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,1 5,1 SSE 2 I ,4 ,2 * * * 0 0 0 0 0 1,8 5,1 S 3 . ,7 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,1 4,1 SSW 1 ,4 ,1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,6 5,3 SW 2 ,7 ,3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,3 5,9 WSW 2 1.4 ,g * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,6 6,1 W 4 2,7 2,6 ,4 * 0 0 '0 0 0 0 5,9 6,6 WNW 3 3.4 7.2 2.9 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 14.0 8.4 NW 3 4.5 11.0 5.8 .3 .1 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 9.0 NNW 3 3.9 8.6 4.0 .3' .1 0 0 0 0 0 17.1 8.7 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.1 0 ALL 4.3 32.3 37.7 14.5 .9 .2 0 0 0 0 0 100 6.9 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) JULY - ALL HOURS SPEED (KNOTS)- TOTAL MEAN 16DiR.PT, I 3J4-6J 7-10J 11-161 17-21J 22-27J 28-33j 34'-40j 41-47j 48-551 >=56PERO~WIND SPEED N .3 3,4 3.4 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.2 6.6 NNE .2 I .3 1.1 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 6.5 NE .2 1.2 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 5.7 ENE .2 1.1 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 4.9 E .6 1,7 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 4.4 ESE .4 2.t .3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 4.8 SE .5 3.'c ,4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 5.0 SSE .4 1.9 .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 4.8 S .4 ,7 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 4.2 .2 .6 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .8 4.7 .2 .8 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 5,2 ,2 1.4 .g .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 6.4 W .~ 2.5 3.0 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 6.8 .4 3.9 7.2 4.3 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 8.5 .3 4,4 10.7 5.6 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 21.3 8.8 .3 3.8 6.0 2.2 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.3 7.9 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.2 0 ALL 5.4 34.1 34.0 13.0 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 100 6.4 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) AUGUST - ALL HOURS SPEED (KNOTS) I TOTAL M~N 16DiRPT, 1 - 314 ' OI 7-10 1 11-16 1 17-21I 22-27/ 28-331.34-40[ 41-471 48-551 >=56 WIND IPERCNT SPEED N 4 3.5 2.7 ,5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 6.5 NNE I 1.3 1.1 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 6.6 NE 2 1.4 ,5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,1 5.7 ENE 2 1,2 ,2 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,7 5,0 E 7 2,0 2 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,8 4,6 ESE 5 2.4 4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 4.9 SE 7 3,5 5 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,8 5.1 4 1.9 3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,7 4,8 S 3 .9 I * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 4.2 2 ,6 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .9 4.5 .3 1.2 4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.9 5.5 .3 1.7 g * 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 6.0 W .7 2.9 2 7 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 6.6 .4 3.7 7 I 3.3 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 8.4 .4 5,1 8.9 4.3 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.0 8.3 .3 4.2 5.7 1.6 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 7.5 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.4 0 ALL 6.1 37.5 31.5 10.4 ,2 * 0 0 0 0 0 100 6.0 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Ob$) (Cont,) SEPTEMBER - ALL HOURS SPEED (KNOTS) '471 48'551 >=561 TOTAL MEAN SPEED N ,5 3.5 3.0 .6 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 6.6 NNE ,3 1,5 1,1 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,2 6,6 NE .3 1.3 .4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 5,9 ENE .4 2.0 .4 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 5.1 E .8 3.5 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 4.8 ESE .7 3.4 .6 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 4.8 SE .8 3.8 .6 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 5.1 SSE .§ 1.7 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 4,8 S .4 1.0 .2 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 4.3 SS;¥ .2 .8 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 5.0 SW .3 1.7 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 5.3 WSW .4 2.2 .8 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 5.6 W .6 2.6 2.4 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 6.1 ~¥NW .4 3.3 5.6 1.6 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 7.8 NW .5 3.6 6.8 2.7 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.8 8.2 NNW .4 3.8 4.6 1.5 ,1 0 * 0 0 0 0 10.5 7.6 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 0 ALL 7,5 3g. 8 27.8 7.2 ,3 * * 0 0 0 0 100 5.4 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Ohs) (Cont.) OCTOBER - ALL HOURS I I TOTAL MEAN SPEED (KNOTS) -47J 48-551 >=S61PERONT WIND 16 PT. I 31 4 - 61 7-101 11-161 17-211 22-27/ 28-301 04-401 41 DIR, SPEED N .6 3.1 2.2 .5 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.2 6.4 NNE .3 2.3 1 .§ .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 6.6 NE .5 2.0 .8 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 5.8 ENE .7 3.1 .7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 4.9 E I .1 4.9 I .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.0 4.9 ESE ,9 5.0 .7 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,8 4.9 SE 1,0 3.5 .4 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,1 4,8 SSE .6 I .8 .3 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 4.9 S ,7 1,4 ,2 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,2 4,4 SSW .3 I .1 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 5.0 SW ,4 I .8 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 5.1 WSW .4 2.1 .8 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 5.4 W .6 2.9 1 ~ ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,0 5.6 WNW .§ 3,1 ~- ~ .4 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.6 6.8 NW .§ 3,4 4 7 1,1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 9,9 7,4 NNW ,5 2.8 3 5 1.2 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,2 7,7 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,4 0 ALL 9. § 44.2 22.5 3,9 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 100' 4,8 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND DIRECTION vs SPEED (from HOURLY Obs) (Cont,) NOVEMBER - ALL HOURS I TOTAL MEAN SPEED (KNO'TS) -471 48-551 >=56 WIND 16 PT. 1 31 4 - 6 IPERCNT DIR. I 7-101 11-161 17-211 22-27/ 28-331 34-401 41 SPEED N .4 2.5 1.5 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 6.0 NNE .4 2,0 I .2 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.9 6.4 NE .7 2.9 .8 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 5.5 ENE ,7 4.0 .8 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.7 5.1 E 1.2 5.6 I .7 .2 * * 0 0 0 0 0 8.5 5.3 ESE I .1 4.8 .9 .2 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.2 5.2 SE ,8 3,4 ,6 ,2 ,1 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 5,4 5,7 SSE ,§ 2.0 .5 .2 .1 * 0 * 0 0 0 3,4 5.8 S .5 1.7 .3 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 4.8 SSW .4 1.1 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 4.7 SW .6 1.6 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 4.9 WSW ,6 2.1 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 5.0 W .7 2.8 1.2 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 5.3 WNW .7 3.3 2.0 .3 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 6.4 6.2 NW .6 3.0 2.5 .5 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 6.8 NNW ,4 2.7 2.3 .8 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.4 7.1 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 0 ALL 1075 45.6 17,3 3.2 .5 .1 0 * 0 0 0 100 4.4 · = PERCENT < .05 Frequency Surface WIND BIRECTION v$ SPEED (from HOURLY Obe) (Cont,) DECEMBER - ALL HOURS I SPEED (KNOTS) TOTAL MEAN 16 PT. I - 3 - 6l 7-10l 11 6 DIR. I4I I -1 I 17-211 22-271 28-331 34-401 41-471 48-551 >=56 PERCNT WIND SPEEB N 6 2,4 I ,3 ,3 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,4 5,g NNE 3 1.8 .8 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 6.2 NE 8 2.4 .6 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 5.3 ENE 7 3.7 .8 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 5.2 E 1 4 4.3 1.5 .1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 5.1 ESE 9 4.3 .9 .2 .1 .1 * * 0 0 0 6.7 5.8 SE 7 3.1 .8 .2 .2 .1 * * 0 0 0 5.4 6.6 SSE 7 2.3 .7 .3 .2 .1 0 * 0 0 0 4.3 6.4 $ g 2.2 .4 .1 * * 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 4.8 SSW .4 I .2 .1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 4.7 SW .5 I .7 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.§ 5.1 WSW .8 2.2 .5 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 5.0 W 1.0 3.0 I .0 ,1 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.8 5.0 WNW .6 3.6 1.7 .3 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 5.9 NW ,7 3.3 ?.2 .6 * * 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 6.7 NNW .6 2.2 .9 .4 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.3 6.7 VAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 0 ALL '~: .7 44.0 1 ~. 4 2.8 .7 .3 * * 0 0 0 100 4.3 · = PERCENT < .05