HomeMy WebLinkAboutUST-REPORT 6/1/1994BUSiNESS/DEAPRTMENTNAME: Ur,&x2.mc- ~,t~e~,j',,,~
ADDRESS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT NUMBER: ~ ~z~'~
/
DA~: N~: CHGD: COM~~S:
' P.M.
AREA O{ ~DE' NUMBER . E~TENSI~
SIGNED . TOPS FORM 4002
~,~oj~cT.com're,no~: , ~/~'/ ~5"-. r~^i~:
~- - BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPAltTMENT
~. _ .._ ~ ·' 'i~-'. i'. "'* 'BUREAU OF FIRE PREYENTION.
· ~ ; APPLICATION ."
'-' t ' : ' ' :'
· , In conformii¥ w'i~h pro~i~i .on~ of.~rfinent ordinances, cOd~:~nd/Or.-r~jul~ion~, al~,lic~tion ~ m~de
:,,'~-.-_ :. ,'.~ : , .
,~..~, -..., ,.,,. :::':...._..: ....... ....,
.... · +.~.~.~ ~, .. ~ .
' . · : .. ': 't. ~ , . ' ' - '
~ to display,. ~m;:~(ali, use~ o~mte; ~il or handle .m~erials or p~S' !nv°lving or c~ting'~ns- . ." '
- diti~s:~e~'haZardous to. life or pro~ as follows:.. _ .'.. .. *
' ', ~" ~ ' , ". ~ "' , ,. i
~t~i:zed Repr~tive
~it ~.J/-...l..7~~.~. .¢/¢- B~ .......................... ' ...........
t .~te . .' ~' .Fire ~1 ...... .: ' ..... ¢ .~ .'
SFIELD FIRE DEPARTME
MATERIAL DIVISION
0 G Street,
BakO{V0fsield, CA 93301
) 326-3979
TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM
FACILITY , ~ ~c~ II .~,~ k. ~t~ ADDRESS ~4
OWNER ........ PE~IT T~ OPE~%E%
CO~CTOR ~ ~ ~ CONTACT PERSON
LABO~TORY ~,~.;A % OF S~PLES , %~
TEST METHODOLOGY ~,~---~.k ~,:...~' ~
PRELI~NARY ASSESSMENT' CO. - ~ ' "CONTACT PERSON
PLOT PLAN '
' ~ ~' ~ /~ ' '
CONDITION OF TANKS
CONDITION OF PIPING
.. CONDITION OF SOIL
January 18, 1994 Ralph E. Huey
DATE INSPECTORS NAME S IGNAZ~JRE
?
Tosco Distribution Company
· ../~fl P.O. Box 2628
. ~ 0~ Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Telephone: 562-906-7500
Facsimile: 562-906-7544.
TOSCO
Mr. Ralph E. Huey
Hazardous Material Coordinator
Bakersfield City Fire Department
1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: Results of Due Diligence Assessment Activities
Tosco (Former 76 Products Company) Bulk Plant No. 0959
524 Delores Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Huey:
Please find the enclosed assessment report for the former UNOCAL/76 Products Company bulk plant in Bakersfield,
California. This asset was purchased by Tosco along with other UNOCAL assets on March 31, 1997. The enclosed
report was the result of the Phase II Due Diligence work conducted by Tosco.
The site is an operating bulk plant, constructed in 1956. The facility is currently being used for handling drums and
packaged petroleum products. The site previously housed seven fuel and oil underground storage tanks (USTs), which
were removed in 1993. Remaining site structures include a warehouse used for storage and a compressor shed
associated with a former truck wash area. The bulk plant was constructed and operated by UNOCAL or their lessee
until the acquisition by Tosco. The lessee continues to use the site.
The site assessment activities were conducted by Pacific Environmental Group; Inc. (PACIFIC), in September 1997.
The scope of work included (1) advancing one hand boring using a hand auger and three soil borings using a Geoprobe-
equipped drill rig, and (2) collecting soil samples from the borings. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the soil
sample collected from the hand boring.
As you are aware, previous soil assessment activities have been conducted at the site. Upon completion of the previous
soil assessment and soil remediation activities, a letter dated February 7, 1995, indicating that "no further investigation,
removal or remedial action" was necessary at the site was issued by your office. Based on the status of the former site
assessment case, and upon your review of the enclosed due diligence report, we respectfully request concurrence from
your office that no additional work is required at the site.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed report, Please contact me at (562) 906-7402.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Truesdale
Project Manager, Remediation
Enclosure
cc: Jim Adams, Tosco (w/o enclosure) '~'/'-`%
Mike CaldWell, Tosco (w/o enclosure)
Max Boone, Tosco (w/o enclosure)
.- ~ .... ENVIRONMENTAL
'";" ' ' F, ebmary 1.2'; 1'998' , ' ':
-'""'"' ' P 0J ~ 304 01'6 lA
- -..,.- - " r ec r
~ . . - - , . . : · ; .
Mr,' Max -Bootie, Environmental CoordinaiOr - .,,- ,-'.. .
· "- : TOsco Refining, andMarkgtifig Incorpordted- ~ ' " .....
, . · , .. , , . . · ..... . . , ,. . ',, ~., . ',; , ' '; ' . .
- ' ; "- :Av6fiRefinery- .... · ~ ' ........ ·
' ' ~' "': , Martictez, California 94553 _ ' .... ' '" '
· . . : .L~:'. ' . . . . ;., ¥ . , '..¢.-. - ' ' .... ._
:.' .; x... " :. ' - f_- .' ' ' '-
Re:.- surnrnary o£As~essrnent'Acti¥i{ies.' . . ~''¢ ' ;'" - '~ :': ....
TosceBulk?larttNo:'09$9 - .": ~.'.', ;-'', ' ,'- .-- : ' .., - : .
· ,524 ¢ .... ' ......
: " DOlotcsStr¢ t ' . - '~" ',~"
_. - .~. _/ - ..-.,.- . ,.
-'~ :" '-". i.'. ""' Bakersfield, Cali£ernia ' : , .-' '
..... 'Dear Mr. Bo'o~e:.- . : ". -" ~ - · '
'"' "~',.: ' On'. behal£ o£Tosc0 Distribution ComPany_ (To,sco),,?a_gifi¢ Environmental Oroup,;Inc.; : '. . "
: - (?ACIFIC)conducted assessrnen't a¢ti¥ities at the al~ove,r¢£~reri¢¢d'~it¢.-The'assessment .
~ .. was c~nducted as part Of Tos¢0's d,¢ diligence pmgrarn £0r"bulk plant £a¢ilities'locat~d ,
"' - 'thi~0ugh~ut-the west'cohst: The scope 'of-Work included,drilliflg five'exPloratory seil' ·
· , .., .. ,.,'-bdrii~gs']and ¢oli¢¢ting soil Carnples..The b0ri~g locat, i0ns are shown on Figure ll..:The :
'field prddcdur~s.are';de'sdribed in Attachment 1 and the borinB logs,',ar¢ -inCkfded as ~ '.,:
:, ,. Attachrncnt 2: The .~oil analyiical"re~f~lts are summarized in Tabl8 1 a~d, C~riified '
- ---. ' -,Analytical .,R~ports ar¢'includCdin'Attaghment.3LA list showin~ t_he:number Ofdmm~'' .. ..--
· - _ . .. / . . . . . -- .
.' .containing soil cuttingSat~d rinsate water generated during the 'a§s~ssrnertt activities, is
"includ'gd as,Attachment 4." ...~..,: .., . . , ..
':' ' -,' "[ '-' -' '" -' · ' : ' ' ' - '' ' ' ' ': -
·; :." ; ....5. ~'./~' ~he'sitbTi's, an ,o,,p~erating bulk.plant iocate~l'in Kerb.coUnty,: atthe comef°fDoloresan4
' :., '? i _,~ 0~' .'Kern s{reets in.Bakersfield, Cali,f6'mia.' Th~ biilk Plant was c°ngtmcted'in 19'56 and':".-'.
". :.'."" :^;,~ -. '~ '-:::. 'currentlY'cor[sist~'o~'a S ,reu'o. e nome&; a'dmm storag~ arga, al0ading rack~" · -'-'
· £.~'~- ,..,-, :.._. ,- . . ,. .~,-,,,--..~- , , . ., .... :. ,-,..., -. ,, :.,.,. .,. .... · , ~;'-.. ,,. .
_.' -. . -~-,: ...... -' d~spense~ground,sto.rage t~nd a washdown.area., Stte photographs taken,- -, .,..,., '. ~ ..
"'-' ', '. ~ ~i~c~-~'"; dufing.a~prgvi°us site visit are inbluded.inAttachrnen~ 1. ". ':' ': ;'-'"."7':":' '., ,'. ;; :, '.''
'.-':':"-~:°t':.~:'.':" '""' · ~: '-,:~'.._ ' ' ".:'"'i: ','i' -'..":.--.:.4.:-, ~ :):,- '.'_'.' .':... ':-'~. ,..'_.-.` , .,'.',.~, .
1: ",. ,'. ,:-, '".,:~ ".' '- PACIFIC conducted the assessment activities on September 30,".1997,'pet TosCo~s Scor~e
',, ',:-/".:, ;.-' ".~'. ~.i , bf'W0rk. :T'hree-soll bbrings:'(SB~2ihr°Ugh sB}4,) were :idvaneed /o a d'ePth:'of;21.'5 fee't,
~.,',,, ', ,"'. ": ?' ' ,:-:.i', ,',' i ~ belc~W, gr?nd"su~a~e (b~s)' U'singl a Geoprobe®, eqUipped drillingi-ig..'S:0il Samples were`
:. '"',.i'::,. i'.' ?':',' ":"' yollecfed'a~,5 foot !~{elx~ais.,t~Ythet0ta!depthleXplbied.~.B~/ing, SB:f ~nc~)Ufi~ered r~fUsal,.
,,', .,: ' ' !. , :' ,: :- :" at l'e~s than.5 'feet bgs andno; samples 4rere.obtained;. Bbrin-g HBE1 ~as':adqanced . '" :'~ ::' -'-"' ".' ' .
,:'.::. ", 7' ' ' .':-,;':'manua'lly.'~vith~,~/- ha,na"aug~ ~o a-depth-of, appr0x/matelx' 5:5-:feet bgs-: Sit~'.s°ils '-,'i :~, "i'-.'" /'~'.' ~.';'..', '
.: "' ','i... '. ' ..,' :..,'", 'encot~ri~tergd included y. ellowish' brown P0brlY-g;~ided s~nd'and silty Sand; ::'~011ected aoil:"i'~" ": :'
'-. -" · -'650 Si&~r~a Madre Vill~..Suit'e:2O4,' Pasadena, C~lifomia.91107, ' . .... '.'(626) 351-4814 FAX;(626)-351-z[822 -
-.. , -.., ~f .'~ .., .... . . ;.,,. .: - . ~ .. - ~. ... . '.-,
Were'field s ~bl'e photoionizatiOn.'detectOr '(PID). :No product'
od0r 0relevated PtD' readings were.de tected .iff sgi!.samples?collgctod?from any site
gs.~ SOil....descripti°ns'and'pID re,dings are inClu'ded on'the boring lbgs in
Attachment 2: in site' bOrings?
One soil shmpl{.,·.per'boring wfis-solected 'for.~alysis baSed on the presence of odor or
-stmnihg~-. eleVated ?ID readings, or .likely Contaminar/t dopth; were 'zed for
' total. ~)etr01eum hydrocarbons.~ quantified in the gasoline r .a!?ge (TF Hg), diesel
..range.~(TpHd),. and oil range Cali'f0rnia Department of Health Services (DHS)
modified U;S.,EPA Methods 35'10 and 3550, and.for'.l -toluehe,.eth/¢l benZene
total xylenes (BTEX)'by DHS.modified EPA'Method 5030/80201
Analytical reSults indicate that SOil ,is ~mt TP.Hd quan. tified'in, the C15.to,~38
...... range at the boring HB- 1 'location which' is next tO-Outfall- 1 at
foet bgs. TPHd,was detected in borings HB: 1 and SB~3 m concentrati'6ns of 11Oand 5.4-
milligramS, per kilOgram,.respective!y (Tab. le 1).~' ' --,-
If you have .dny ~questions regarding this report, please call'me at (626) :351-4814.
Pacific Environ~nental.Group,
Project Geologist'
Attachment~: 'Table 1~- s/~mmary Soil Analytical, Results
-' ' - Attachment 1 - Summa~ of Field ~ -,
. · _ Attachment' 2,,~Exploratory'Boring Logs. . , .... ...
':Attachment 3- certified Analytical-'Repo~$
Attachment-4- .W. aste Inventory.Record
cc: ~Jim'Adams, Tosco Distribution Company
Larry Silva,' Tosco Distribution Comp_any . ~
Mike Caldwell,~Tosco. Distribution'Company. - ' '
'Mike ~NOll,-Noll EnVironmental
G:\pr0ject~304\016h'eportXtx0959.doc .
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Tosco Bulk Plant No. 0959
Bakersfield, California
EPA Method 8015M EPA Method 8020
Sample Sample Sample Ethyl- Total
Name Date Depth (ft) TPH-g TPH-d Benzene Toluene ' benzene Xylenes
Soil Samples (rog/Kg)
HB-1-5 9/30/97 5 nd 110 nd nd nd nd
SB-2-6 9/30/97 6 nd nd nd nd nd nd
SB-3-6 9/30/97 6 nd 5.4 nd nd nd nd
SB-4-6 9/30/97 6 nd nd nd nd nd nd
NOTES:
nd = Not detected (See Lab Report for Detection Limits). -- = Not analyzed, rog/Kg = milligrams per kilogram.
TPH-g = Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline. TPH-d = Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel.
TB0959.XLS\0959-tbl Page 1 of 1 1/22/98
RAILROAD-I
UST-H225 UST-H224
----1
~ ii~ la~l ~ ,' ,,
I,, ' ~ ~. r I'~ I'~ WS.DWN-~ "!
I suMP-1 --" I' I' I' I'l sB-3o°
: '~__11 , I ,I , I ,I ,
iiI II II Il I DiSPE~-] :
,I OUTFALL-IHB'I *r- UST-H32S I_l .-I --I OSB-2 I
~1 ~ LRACK-1
DISPEN-2
[ YACANT-I OFFICE STRHSE-I
: I '
I :
DOLORES STREET
LEGEND
SB-I O SOIL BORING LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION
HB-I · HAND BORING LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION
SCALE: 1" = 60'
PACIFIC SITE MAP. Revision Date:
TOSCO CORPORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL 76 Products Company Bulk Plant No. 0959
" GROUP, lNG. 524 Dolores Street
-- . Bakersfield, California 0959
:-
· AREAS O~' CONCERN LOCATION MAP
KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS
Not typically shown on maps:
DFA - Drum filling area ABPIPE - Aboveground product piping.'
DISPEN ~ Dispensers SBSRFC - Subsurface soil and grOUndwater
'DITCH - Ditch or creek SEWER - Sewer piping
DSA - Drum storage area UNPIPE - Underground Product piping
DRYWELL - Dry well
FILL - Fill area
GAR- Garage
GASTTN - Gas station Note: 4 digit tank numbers correspond to
HWSA - Hazardous waste storage area
IMPND - Impoundment 76 Products designations.
LAYDOWN - Laydown
LRACK - Loading rack
MAINT - Maintenance area
MARACK - Marine loading rack
OUTFALL - Outfall
OWS - Oil/Water separator
PUMP - Pump -
RAILROAD - Railroad
SEPTIC - Septic tank or cess pool
SPILL - Spill site
STRHSE - Storehouse
SUMP - Sump
TK - Aboveground tank
' TRANS - Transformer
UST - Underground tank
VACANT - Vacant
WELL - Drinking water well
WSHDWN - Wash down rick
WWTP - Waste water treatment plant
LEGEND
· "Prime" indicates former tank location with same tank number
- Former site feature
Existing site feature
Property 'line .
~ PROCEDURES;
'" -FIELD
'Drilling and Soil samPlin liih
g Procedures.i Prior to dfi g, PACIFIC n~0tified
_ Underground' SerVi~e~Alertand retained a private utility 10cator to clear each'of'the
Proposed l~0ring.10~ati0ffs.~ The upPer 5' feet'of the ~b~r-eholes were then dug using a hand
aug~r and/or P0st:h°le'digger.` The'b0ring~ Wereadvanced by G~oProb~®~direct push . '
method .using/t'drill.'rig equipped, with a hydraulic' downhole ~hammer· and', 1.5.-inch~ drill
'-'piPe:' 'The borings~Were logged' by a PACIFIC geologist using the-unified.Soil '
Classification, System~and standard geologic.tec,hniques.' Sol! samp!es for~!ogging,and',
p0ssiblech~mic, al analysis, were c611ected'at 5~footmihimum'depth intervals by. ~et~racting:
the sampler bit a~nd advancifig, the'. lined Geopiobe® sampler approximately '24 inches'imo
undisturbed soil. 'S0il Samples for chemical analysi~ were'retained:in 1.25~irichbrass or
stainless-steel rings~'capped with' Teflon®~lined plastic end-~aps,., labeled,' sea!e,d in _ .
Zipl0ck®~ bags;find placed on.ice for transp0rt Vih F~der?jExpress to ToSco's contracted'
laboratory. 'samples from hand-augered,borings were collected With.ahand .driven ' ·
Sampi~r:lified Wlth brass Or Steel sample"rings~ or, grab Samples Were collected ftomthe
.~. auger;~bUcket"and packed tig_h.t!y into. the .sample. rin~gs. The'dOwn-h01e~ dril!ing and
sampling equipment were steam-clean,ed or.washed following .the,completion of each soil
-bert/~g and'betWe'en ~ampleS, -
"Organic VaporAnaiysisPr0ceduresi :S6il samples collected.in the field: were'analyzed
Using a'photoionizati6n detect,0t calibrated to 100 parts Per million,by v61ume (ppm)
· . isobutylene2 The~test procedure involved ·placing appr0xi~hately.30 grams fr0m·as-oil .
~ ~ampie imo-a heWZiplock® :bag' and sealing 'the ~bag.. The bag wasallbvced,to'.sef for
'-apProxin~ateiy:20 minutes: Th~ bag W-as'~hen. Pie~'ced.and. the'~hdad-sp'ace te'sted for t°tal
~ ,0~ganic.lvapor, measured in'Parts Per million(Ppmi volt/me/.~0ifime): The headspace
readin, gs Were'recorded,0n. the boring logs. · ...... ,,, ..
'??~. -: . . '
Photo 1: Office and warehouse from Dolores Street, view to northeast.
Tosco//0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 2: Office and warehouse from Dolores Street, view to northwest.
Tosco//0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 3: Warehouse (STRHSE-1) with loading rack (LRACK-2) to left, view to southeast.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 4: Office, view to southeast.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 5: East side of site, with washdown ~(WSHDWN-1) to left.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 6: Loading rack (LRACK-1), view to northeast.
Tosco//0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 7: Dispenser area (DISPEN-1), view to northeast.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 8: Washdown slab area (WSHDWN-1), view to northeast.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 9: West end of site, vacant land (VACANT-l) to left, DSA-1 to fight, view to north.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 10: Dram storage area (DSA-1) with asphalt patches at former USTs, v~ew to
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 11' Drum storage area (DSA-1) with asphalt patches at former USTs, view to west.
Tosco//0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
'Photo 12: Former UST area (11220 to H224), view-to northeast.
Tosco//0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 13: Former dispenser area (DISPEN-2) at northwest comer, view to southeast.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
Photo 14: Surface water outfall (OUTFALL-1) on west side of site, view to west.
Tosco #0959 Bakersfield, CA 1/16/97
ATTACHMENT
"' :"' ' .... Li~RATORy "' LoGs
·-' '- : · '>-EXP.. BORING
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. BORING NO. SB-2
PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO:304-016.1A CLIENT: TOSCO
LOGGED BY: J.Greger DATE DRILLED: 9-30-97
DRILLER: WESTHAZMAT LOCATION: BP 0959 Bakersfield, CA
DRILLING METHOD: GEOPROBE HOLE DIAMETER: 2"
SAMPLING METHOD: PUSH HOLE DEPTH: 21.5'
CASING TYPE: NA WELL DIAMETER: NA
~ SLOT SIZE: NA WELL DEPTH: NA
GRAVEL PACK: NA CASING STICKUP: NA
z
'WELL n' >- LITHOLOGY/REMARKS
COMPLETION
//' 6to 8" ASPHALT/SAND/GRAVEL BASE
SP SAND: brown; trace silt; coarse sand; poorly graded; no
hydrocarbon odor.
Backfilled
with '
Grout ,
~ V-Mst 0 @5': as above.
V-Mst 0
@10': as above; coarser sand.
SILTY SAND: yellowish brown; 15 to 20% silt; very fine
sand; dense; poorly graded; no hydrocarbon odor.
V-Ms1 0
@20': as above.
BOTTOM OF BORING 21.5'
No groundwater encountered
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. BORING NO. SB-3
PAGE 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO:304-016.1A CLIENT: TOSCO
LOGGED BY: J.Greger DATE DRILLED: 9-30-97
DRILLER: WESTHAZMAT LOCATION: BP 0959 Bakersfield, CA
DRILLING METHOD: GEOPROBE HOLE DIAMETER: 2"
SAMPLING METHOD: PUSH· HOLE DEPTH: 21.5'
CASING TYPE: NA WELL DIAMETER: NA .
SLOT SIZE: NA WELL DEPTH: NA
GRAVEL PACK: NA CASING STICKUP: NA
WELL ,,, - w
--E o .- LITHOLOGY/REMARKS
COMPLETION
~o n ,z,,~ w'~ ,o ~r 0
!~ 6 to 8" ASPHALT/SAND AND GRAVEL BASE
-¥
:::::::::~:'.::i SP SAND: lig.hi yellowish brown; 15% silt; 85% very fine sand;
poorly graded; no hydrocarbon odor.
Backfilled
with ,
Grout '
@5': as above.
D p 0 ~ .:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.
~ '.::::::::::::'.:::
10 ' @10': as above; trace to 10% silt; coarser sand.'
D p 0 ~ :':!::.::':!:!::':!::
12
13
14
Mst 0 15 i~;:.'.':.-:¢:::::::; @15': as above.
16
17
18
19
// Mst 0 20 ~ ~i!i!ii!iiiill @20': as above;, coarser sand.
! 2.1 ~i:i~:.~ BOTTOM OF BORING 21.5'
No groundwater encountered'
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. BORING NO. SB-4
PAGE 1 OF 1
· PROJECT NO: 304-016.1A CLIENT: .TOSCO
LOGGED BY: J.Gre'ger DATE DRILLED: 9-30-97
DRILLER: WESTHAZMAT LOCATION: BP 0959 Bakersfield, CA
DRILLING METHOD: GEOPROBE HOLE DIAMETER: 2".
SAMPLING METHOD: PUSH HOLE DEPTH: 21.5'
CASING TYPE: NA WELL DIAMETER: NA
SLOT SIZE: NA WELL DEPTH: NA
GRAVEL PACK: NA CASING STICKUP: NA
WELL mn' z~ E ~ ~
COMPLETION ~LU ,, .:2 ~' ~ ~ LITHOLOG /REMARKS
oo c~ ,z,,~ ,,, o cc o
' ~ o ~- a. ~ ~ ~ 6t0 8 ASPHA~"~'S"~~-----m
SP 8AND: very pale brown; predominantly coar'se grained, trace to
10% fines; poorly graded; dense; no hydrocarbon odor.
/ with /
Grout //
@ 5': as above.
D p 0 !~ :::::::::::::"::..
~: :.:....:.:....?:
@ 10': as above; increase in gravel; sub-angular to 1/2" in
~ 10 ~i~ !:!:!:!:!:!:!:!: diameter.
D p 0 ~i: :..::::~:..:::::...!:
11
13 -[ ~'~ SM SILTY SAND: light yellowish-brown; 15 - 20% silt, 80-85%
predominantly very fine to fine grained sand; dense; no odor.
14
Mst 0 15 @15': as above.
~i~:~ · ·
16 :~ .
~:~ ..'
18 ML SANDY SILT: light yellowish-brown; 80% silt, 20% very fine
grained sand; stiff; no odor.
19
@20': as above.
Mst 0 20 I~1
'~ ' ~ .L_ BOTTOM OF BORING 21.5'
' No groundwater encountered
-- -- 22--
ATTPiCHMENT 3 "':
' '~-" CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL REPORTS -, '-- ' '
,. _ - ; :' -~-
~" ~. 2852 Alton Ave., Irvine, CA 92606 (7~14) 261-1022 FAX (714) 26J -1228
Del Mar Analytical
. 16525 Sherman Way, Suite C-11,¥an Nuys, CA 91406 (818) 779-1844 FAX (818} 779-1843
2465 W. 12th St., Suite I, Tempe, AZ 85281 (602) 968-8272 FAX (602) 968-~ $38
........................ .............. ; ................................. ........
650 Sierra Madre Villa, Ste. 204 Bakersfield Received: Sep 30, 1997 Hi
ii!~:Pasadena CA 911'07 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/CA DHS Mod. 8015/8020 Extracted: Oct 1-2, 1997!~iiii
iiiiiAttention: Laura Rainey First Sample #: V7091304 Analyzed: Oct 1-2~ 1997ilii
Reported: Oct 9, 1997
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS/BTEX DISTINCTION (CA DHS Mod. EPA 80'15/8020)
Laboratory Sample Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total
Number Description Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene - Xylenes
Soil mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
V7091304 SB-2-6 N.D. N.D. N;D. N.D. N.D.
Dilution 1:1 Reporting Limit: 1.0 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.015
V7091305 SB-3-6 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Dilution 1:1 Reporting Limit: 1.0 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.015
V7091306 SB~4-6 N.D. N.D' N.D. N.D. N.D.
Dilution 1:1 Reporting .Limit: 1.0 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.015
V7091307 HB-i-5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Dilution 1:1 Reportihg Limit: 1.0 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.015
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C12.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present at or above the reporting limit. Dilution factors are due to matrix effects and other factors.
DEL MAR ANALYTICAL; VAN NUYS (ELAP #1855)
\
Project Manager
Results pertain only to samples tested in the laboratory. This r~port shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written ~errnission from Del Mar Analytical. V7091304.PEG <1 of 4>
· 2852 AKon Ave., Irvine, CA 92606 ('/14) 261-1022 FAX (./14) 261-1228
Del MarAnalytical
i.. 16525 Sherman Way, Suite C-fl,Van Nuys, CA 91406 (818) 779-1844 FAX (8t8] 779-1845
2465 W. 12th St., Suite 1, Tempe, AZ 85281 (602) 968-8272 FAX [602) 968-1338
~i!650 Sierra Madre Villa, Ste. 204 Bakersfield Received: Sap 30, 1997iii~i~
?:i::iPasadena, CA 91107 Analysis Method: EPA 3550/CA DHS Mod. 8015 Extracted: Oct 6, 1997ii:~
'ii;~:iAttention: Laura Rainey First Sample #: ~ V7091304 Analyzed: Oct 8, 1997ii!
~:!:~
~ . . ' ' Reported: Oct 9,. 1997iii·
i !ii!:~:i:!:i:i:i:i~i:i:i:i:~:~:!:~ ~ ~:!:~:~:!:~ :!:!:~:~:~:~:~:~ :~ :~:~:~:!:i:i :i
EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (CA DHS Mod. EPA 8015)
Laboratory Sample Sample' Reporting Dilution Hydrocarbon
Number Description Result Limit Factor Type,
Soil mg/Kg mg/Kg
(ppm) (ppm)
V7091304 SB-2-6 N.D. 5.0 1 N.A.
V7091305 · SB-3-6 5.4 5.0 1 C12-C34
V7091306 SB-4-6 N.D. 5.0 1 N.A.
V7091307 HB-1-5 110 25 5 C12-C38
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a diesel fuel standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C8 to C40.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present at or above the reporting limit. Dilution factors are due to matrix effects and other factors.
DEL MAR ANALYTICAL, VAN NUYS (ELAP #1855)
Project Manager
Results pertain only to samples tested in the laboratory. This report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Del Mar Analytical. V7091304.PEG <2 of 4>
; '~:~-, 2852 Alton Ave., Irvine, CA 92606 (714) 261-1022 FAX (7141 261-1228
Del MarAnalytical
ii ,~:' 1014 E. Cooley Dr., Suite A, Colton,'CA 92324 (909) 370-4667 FAX (909) 370-1046
~6525 Sherman Way, Suite C-11,Van Nuys, CA 91406 (818) 779-1844 FAX (818) 779-1843
2465 W. 12th St., Suite 1. Temoe. AZ 8528~ f602~ 968-8272 FA~ I602
Pacific Environmental Group Extracted: Oct 1-2, 1997
6§0 Sierra Madre Villa, Ste. 204 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Analyzed: Oct 1-2, 1997
Attention: Laura Rainey "
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS/BTEX DISTINCTION (CA DHS Mod. EPA 8015/8020)
Sample Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total
Description Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes
mg/Kg mg/Kg · mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
Method Blank N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Dilution 1:1 Reporting Limit: 1.0 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.015
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C12.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present at or above the reporting limit. Dilution factorsare due to matrix effects and other factors.
DEL MAR ANALYTICAL; VAN NUYS (ELAP #1855)
Project Manager '
# Results pertain only to samples tested in the laboratory. This report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written permission fram Del Mar Analytical. VT091304.PEG <3 of 4>
2852 Alton Ave., Irvine, CA 92714 (714) 261-1022 FAX (714~ 26i-1228
DelMar Analytical 1014 E, ¢ooley Dr,, $uite ^, £olto~, ~^ 92324 1909l$70-4667 F/~(909}~70-1046
16525 Sherman Way, Suite C-11, Van Nuys, CA 91406 (818) 779-1844 FAX (818) 779-1843
2465 W. 12th St., Suite 1, Tempe, AZ 85281 (602) 968-8272 FAX (602) 968-1338
Pacific Environmental Group Extracted: Oct 6, 1997
650 Sierra Madre Viila, Ste. 204 .................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analyzed: Oct 8, 1997
Pasadena, CA , 91107 i ~~ ~i~ ii ii iiiiii Reported: Oct 9, 1997
Attention: Laura Rainey
EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (CA DHS Mod. EPA 8015)
Sample sample Reporting Dilution Hydrocarbon
Description Result Limit Factor Type
Soil mg/Kg mg/Kg
(ppm) (ppm)
Method Blank N.D. .. 5.0 I N.A.
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a jet fuel standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C8 to C40.
Analytes reported as N.D, were not present at or above the reporting limit.
DEL MAR ANALYTICAL, VAN NUYS {ELAP #1855)
Mary Ann Liils~l
:. ,~' Project Manager
Results pertain only to samples tested in the laboratory. This report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Del Mar Analytical. V7091304.PEG <4 of 4>
2852 Alton Ave., Irvine, CA 92606 [714) 261-1022 FAX (714) 261-1228
1014 E. Cooley Dr., Suite A, Colton, CA 92324 (909) 570°4667 FAX (909) 370-! 046
Del MarAnalytical
2465 W. 12th St., Suite I, Tempe, AZ 85281 (602) 968-8272 FAX (602) 968-~ 338
EPA Method 801518020 Matrix: Soil
Date:· 10/01/97
Sample #: V7091243
Batch #: GJ01G41S
Analvte R1 sS_p_ ,MS MSD PR1 ,PR2 RPD Mean PR ,Acceptance Limits
ppm ppm ppm ppm % % % % RPD Mean PR
TPH 0.17 1.0 1.1 ' 1.0 90 86 4.0 I88 _<30 70 - 124
Benzene 0 0.10 0.094 0.092 94 92 1.7 93 <25 70 - 124
Toluene 0.00014 0.10 0.092 0.092 92 92 0.36 92 -<22 70- 120
Ethylbenzene 0 0.10 0.090 0.090 90 90 0.39 90 -< 12 70 - 126
Xylenes 0 0.30 0.27 0.27 90 90 0.70 90 <22 70. 124
Definition of Terms
R1 .................... Result of Sample Analysis
Sp .................... Spike Concentration added to sample
MS .................... Matrix Spike Result
MSD ................... Matrix Spike Duplicate Result
PR1 ................... Percent Recovery of MS; ((MS-R1)/SP) X 100
PR2.' .................. Percent Recovery of MSD; ((MSD-R1)/SP) X 100
RPD ................... Relative Percent Difference; ((MS-MSD)/(MS+MSD)I2) X 100
Mean PR ............... Mean Percent Recovery .~
Acceptance Limits ...... Determined by in-house Control Charts
Del Mar Analytical
2852 Alton Ave., Irvine, CA 92606 (714) 261-I022 FAX (714) 261-1228
. 16625 Sherman Way, Suite C-11;Van Nuys, CA 91406 (818} 779-1844 FAX (818} 779-1845
2465 W. 12th St., Suite I, Tempe, AZ 85281 (602) 968-8272 FAX (602) 968-1338
EPA METHOD: 8015 by extraction
Matrix: Soil
DATE: 10~8~97
SAMPLE #: V7091260
MEAN
Analyte RI' Sp MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD PR
ppm ppm ppm ppm % % % %
Hydrocarbons '1 6.2 I 200 I 190 I 480 I 92°/° I 87°'~ I 5.4% I 89% I
Definition of Terms:
RI ..................... Result of Sample Analysis
Sp ..................... Spike Concentration Added to Sample
MS ..................... Matrix Spike Result
MSD .................... Matrix Spike Duplicate Result
PR1 .................... ' perCent Recovery of MS; ((MS-R1) / SP) X 100
PR2 ................ ' .... Percent Recovery of MSD; ((MSD-R1) / SP) X 100
RPD .................... Relative Percent Difference; ((MS-MSD)/(MS+MSD)/2))X 100
Del Mar Analytical
· .:.. ~,.- , .-... -. ' _ -,:
-~- " '' ~-" i ' '~ - '."" ' ~'~
· '."~ ,: -. . .' . ........ , . -, . . · .. .. .
' ~ - ...- - . ; .' .,-: ,. ,". . ...
ATTACHMENT 4 " '
..__WASTEINVENTORYRECORD._.. .. -'
...' -' ~, :.... .~ - . . .
':,. - .:. . ._ '. . . . . _
~ . L . ,' ,. ', " ~ '.: :L .',~.
: ~ ~.! ; .... :.- , - . · ... .
" : ,. ':7 . - ,. - :
~ PACIFIC
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE INVENTORY RECORD
GROUP INC Page [ of !
Project No. Location/SS//- Date Generated
Client Field Technician Date Removed
Well or Depth Type of Waste '1 Date Drum & ID or Comments
Boring ID (Interval) Waste VolumeI Generated Stock Pile and' (wet,odor,chemical
Designation constituents, etc.)
Sketch Locations of Waste
Stock Pile on Site
& Volume
Total Number of
Drums at Site
G:~PROJECT~DMIN~TEMPLATE~Inventry
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL. INc.'
Specialists in Site Assessment, Remedial Testing~ Design and Operation
September 15, 2000 ~ :' ',~'~ - '
Mr. HowardWines .~ ~4t~OO,~t~fl~,~~
Bakersfield Fire Department
Hazardous Materials Division '~'~/O~',~".
1715' Chester Avenue i ~- ' '
Bakersfield, California 93301 : ~ ·
Subject: Submittal of Soil Sampling Report dated September 15, 2000
TOSCO Bulk Plant 0959
524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California
Mr. Wines:
At the request of TOSCO Corporation (TOSCO), Horizon EnvirOnmental Inc. (Horizon) is
forwarding the enclosed report dated September 15; 2000 for the above-referenced site.
Please call us at (916) 939 - 2170 if you have any questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Senior Project Manager
enclosures
cc Mr. Dan Truzzolino, TOSCO
5011 Golden Foothill ParkwaY, Suite~7 · El Dorado FtilIs/CA 95762 · (916)' _93.9-21'70 · FAX (9j6)_939-2-172
P.O. Box-5283 · Bakersfield, CA} 93388 · (661) 589-8389 · FAX (661) .589-1456
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Specialists in Site Assessment, Remedial Testing, Design and Operation
September 15, 2000 .~ '-
Mr: Dan Tmzzolino
TOSCO Corporation
P.O. Box 2628
Santa Fe Springs, California 90670-0628 ·
Subject: .... : Results of Soil Sampling and GeoProbe Investigation
TOSCO Bulk Plant No. 0959, 524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California
Mr. Truzzolino:
Horizon Environmental Inc. (HorizOn) is forwarding this report of the results of soil
sampling at the above referenced site. This work performed was to evaluate soil for the
presence of hydrocarbons at selected locations. The work performed included: preparing a
site-specific Health and Safety plan; collecting soil samples from two hand-augered boring
locations and three geoprobe locations, submitting samples to the laboratory, and preparing
this report which presents the field procedures, results, and conclusions subsequent to
completion of the field work.
Site Description & Background
Tosco Bulk Plant No. 0959 is an operating fuel bulk plant located on the northwest comer of
the intersection of Kern Street and Dolores Street in Bakersfield, California (Figure 1). The
bulk plant was constructed in 1956 and currently consists of a storehouse, an office, a dram
storage area, a loading rack, dispensers, and a washdown area (Figure 2). Underground
storage tanks (USTs) were previously in use at the site but were removed in 1994.
Previous enVironmental work at the site was performed by Pacific Environmental Group
(PEG). This work consisted of a site assessment performed in September 1997. The scope
of work consisted of the collection of soil samples utilizing a Geoprobe equipped drilling rig
and a hand auger. Soil samples collected were from various depths at three locations with
the Geoprobe (SB-2, SB-3, and SB-4) and one location with a hand auger (HB-1). Results
of this investigation were reported by PEG in their report dated February 12, 1998. Total
petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) was detected in the soil sample collected from
location HB-1 at 110 parts per million (ppm) at 5 feet below surface grade (bsg) and location
SB-3 at 6 feet 'bsg at 5.4 ppm. Table 1 from the PEG Report that summarizes the analytical
results of that investigation 'is included with this report. Based on the TPHd concentrations
that were reported in HB-1 the City of Bakersfield Fire Department requested this sample
location be vertically and laterally delineated.
5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, Suite 7 · El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 · (916) 939-2170 · FAX (916) 939-2172
P.O. Box 5283 · Bakersfield, CA 93388 ° (661) 589-8389 ° FAX (661) 589-1456
TOSCO Bulk Plant 0959 9/15/00
Bakersfield, California . '- : Soil Assessment
Field Work .
On June.:13;,200~0; a,HOrizon geologist was at the site to collect soil Samples in the area of
· :. the PEG~.s.,sample..:!ocation HB-I. Utilizing a hand auger' and. hand. driven percussion
sampler,, a soil ~sample .was collected from approximately 8 feet below sUrface grade (bsg)
(HBla-8) at the location of HB-1. A soil sample was also collected from a location
approximately four feet west of HB-1 in the down slope direction: This soil sample (H2-5)
was collected from a depth of approximately 5 feet bsg utilizing the same methods.
Approximate. locations of these soil collection points are depicted on Figure 2.
Soil samples (HB la-8 and H2-5) were collected in clean brass sleeves; sealed with Teflon
tape, and plastic end caps, labeled, stored in cooled storage and transported under chain of
custody (COC) protocol to Baseline On-Site Analysis (Baseline). Baseline is a state-
certified laboratory for the requested analyses. Soil samples were analyzed for TPHd, total
petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes
(BTEX), and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA methods 8015 and 8020. Copies
of the COC and laboratory reports are attached to this report. Results are summarized in
Table 2.
On August 3, 2000, a Horizon geologist observed the sampling of subsurface soil in three
borings (GP-1, GP-2, and GP-3) on the site by utilizing a truck-mounted hydraulic
Geoprobe® 5400 direct-push sampling rig operated by Global Probe, Inc of Bakersfield,
California. The three borings were placed at the locations indicated on the Site Plan (Figure
2). Borings GP-1 and GP-2 were located in areas identified as needing additional
assessment and GP-3 was located to confirm' SB-4 results.
After hand-augering the first few feet to avoid contact with underground utilities, soil
samples were collected from the borings at five-foot intervals or less from a depth of
'approximately 5 feet to the bottom of each boring. GP-1 and GP-2 were advanced to
approximately 15 feet bsg and GP-3 was advanced to approximately 10 feet bsg. Soil
samples were evaluated for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors with a portable
organic vapor meter (OVM). Any evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons, such as OVM
readings, discoloration or odor, wast recorded on' the boring logs. Sediments encountered
during sampling consisted primarily of fine to medium-grained sand with some silt layers to
the bottom of the borings. In the upper five to seven feet of GP-1 and GP-2, some material
that appeared to be portions of bricks or asphalt was encountered. The sediments from each
boring were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A copy of the
USCS is shown on the Boring Log Symbol Key that is included with the Boring Logs
attached to this report. Because the borings were advanced using Geoprobe® direct-push
equipment, no soil cuttings were generated during the sampling operations. Each boring was
backfilled with hydrated bentonite and the surface sealed with asphalt. The soil samples
collected from each boring were sealed, labeled, and contained in chilled storage for
transport to BC Laboratories, Inc. (BC) in Bakersfield, California. Soil samPles were
analyzed for TPHd; TPHg, BTEX,.and MTBE by EPA methods 8015 and 8020'. Copies of
A:k22006~22006.1 I rpt.doc 2 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
TOSCO Bulk Plant 0959 9/15/00
Bakersfield, California Soil Assessment
the COC and laboratory reports are attached to this report. Results are summarized in Table
2.
Results
Laboratory data reported no detectable TPHg, BTEX; or MTBE in the soil samples collected
and analyzed during this investigation. TPHd was detected in four of the five soil samples
analyzed from the geoprobe locations. The highest concentration detected was reported at
23 ppm at seven feet bsg from location GP-1.
Conclusions
Based on the data collected during this investigation, Horizon concludes;
· TPHd previously detected and reported in sample HB-1-5 at 110 ppm is laterally and
vertically delineated to nondetectable and appears to have been a small isolated surface
area that is not laterally or vertically extensive.
· The areas investigated with this Geoprobe assessment do not appear impacted with
gasoline constituents such as TPHg, BTEX or MTBE.
· TPHd concentrations detected in the geoprobe soil samples were at relatively low levels
and appear to decrease with depth and in our opinion pose no threat to groundwater,
which we understand is greater than 100 feet bsg in this area.
Recommendations
In our opinion the concentrations detected do not pose a health concern or require further
action and should naturally attenuate. According to Table 2-1, Leaching Potential Analysis
for Gasoline and Diesel, located in the State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Field Manual (LUFT) it is reasonable to assume that for this site that TPHd at concentrations
up to 1,000 ppm could be left in place without threatening groundwater.
Therefore, based on the data collected during this investigation and the review of the data
collected in the PEG investigation, Horizon recommends closure be granted as a low risk
soil only site.
A:k22006~22006.1 l rpt.doc 3 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
TOSCO Bulk Plant 0959 . 9/15/00
Bakersfield, California . Soil Assessmcni
Distribution
Mr. Howard Wines ....
Bakersfield Fire Department
Hazardous Materials Division
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Sincerely,
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Senior Project Manager
Rexford Smith
Registered Geologist No. 5307
..Attachments:
Figure 1: . Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Site Map
Table 1: Soil Analytical Results (PEG)
Table 2: Soil Analytical Results (Horizon)
Horizon Environmental Inc. Field Methods and Procedures
USCS and Soil Boring Logs
Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody
C. Mr. Jim Stanley, Unocal Bulk Plant
AA22006~22006.11 rpt.doc 4 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
119' '00; O0~ ~l~goo~E ,~20 I ~2t 57' 30"
L % . Z ' .' 2_'; ....... . .....'.'..":' /"?' ~ ........ i
/
:1
" ~':~": :~::? ' :']~":::'i ~ ....... ~:::~ ~,:: ¥;:~h:;;;;:: :'~:~:::~::i:~ , ::::::::::::::::::::::::: , ~,::~ ~:
r ;~' . ~'~;}:%' >;~/} i · J ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~- ......... ./ ~:~?:'E?:: :~E ::E::: ~:::
Name: ~MONT Loca~on: 035' 21' 12.7" N 118' 58' 38.9" W
Date: 9/15/2000 Ca¢on: FIGURE1 SITE VlClNI~ MAP
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet TOSCO BULK P~NT0959
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORPHA
Oopyright (C) 1997, MaCech, Inc.
:~. ~ KERN STREET
F ]
' ~ E~
'-' G
!
DISPEN-1
· -- ~l I
~ I LRACK-2
'" I I ~ i
"-~ I ~'~-"* ~1
' F~ 3
-" ' [ uj~ ]
, E~T3 .
"' Iu~'~
I SUMP-1 OUTFALL-'I I
I~-'
I ' , , VACANT- 1
~ 0 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION (Pocific)
~D BORING LOCA~ON ~D
~1 · DESIGNA~ON (P~cific)
G~oprob~
koc~fion~
~ume: ~gure Modffied From
~oc~c ~mnmen~l umup, inc.
. .~OR[ZON E~RO~MENTAL INC. S~ RGURE
_ TOSCO CORPO~TION
ProJ~t Num~m ~008.11 Drown ~ D. ~ble 76 Products Compuny Bulk Plent No.0959 2
524 Dolores Street
Prepared ~: G.a.~r ~: ~/~ Bokemfield, Colifornie
R~ewed ~ G, ~er R~sed Dote:
/
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Tosco Bulk Plant No. 0959
Bakersfield, California
.... J~A Mt~aod 8015M EPA Method 8020 '
Sa.,nplc Sample S.rn~. lc Ethyl- Total
N~e D~ D~ {fl) ~-~ ~H~ B~ne Tol~ ~e Xyl~es
S~fl S~pl~ (m~
~-1-5 ~/30~7 5 nd [ I0 ~d ~d nd ,~
~2~ 9/30D7 6 nd nd nd nd nd nd
SB-3 ~ 9~ OD7 6 ntl 5.4 mi nd nd nd
SB~ 9~0/97 6 nd nd nd nd nd nd
Rat ~ (~m ~ ~ ;~r ~m L~). -- = N~ ~1~. mgt~ = ~lli~ p= ~b~a~
TABLE 2
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TOSCO Bulk plant 0959
Bakersfield, California
Sample Depth TPHd TPHg B T E X MtBE
Number ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm .ppm
HBla-8 8 '<~10i <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 -<0.005
H2-5 5 ~10: <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
GP1-7 7 23 ! <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02
GP1-15 15 19 <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02
GP2-7 7 13 <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02
GP2-15 15 <10 <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02
GP3-10 10 11 <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.01 <0.02
Notes: Depth = feet below surface grade
ppm = parts per million or mg/kg
TPHd = total Petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
· ' TPHg = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline
B = benzene, T = toluene, E = ethylbenzene, X = xylenes
MTBE = methyl tertiary butylether
22006 Soil Tbl.xls Horizon Environmental Inc.
..-. HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
-: .FIELD METHODS AND PROCEDURES
,. :--:. _.~ ,: The following-section describes field procedures that will be completed by Horizon'
~, ,,, : ,.. Environmental Inc. (Horizon) personnel in performance of the tasks involved with,
this project.
1.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
· :,-,'-.:~-~, , Field work performed by Horizon and subcontractors at the site will be Conducted '-
~ ~:': ~.. according to guidelines established'in'a Site Health and Safety Plan (SHSP). The
SHSP is a document that describes the hazards that may be encountered in the
field and specifies protective equipment, work procedures, and emergency
information. A copy of the SHSP will be at the site and available for reference by
appropriate parties during work at the site.
2,0 LOCATING UNDERGROUND .UTILITIES
Prior to commencement of work on site, the location of underground utilities will be
researched with the assistance .of, Underground Service Alert (usA). USA will
. :contact the. owners of the various utilities in the vicinity of the site to have the utility ......
owners mark the locations of their underground utilities. Work associated with the
boring and monitoring well installation will be preceded by manual hand augering to
a minimum depth of 4 feet below grade to avoid contact with underground utilities.
3.0 SOIL BORING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROTOCOL
Soil borings and soil sampling will be performed under the supervision of a Horizon
geologist. The soil borings will be advanced using a truck-mounted Geoprobe®
direct-push rig.
Soil sampling will be conducted using a 2-foot or 4-foot long split-barrel sampler
lined with a Clear inert PVC sample sleeve. The sampler is driven into the soil at
approximately 5-foot intervals by a hydraulic-driven hammer. Upon recovery, the
clear PVC sample sleeve is removed from the sampler and examined by the
geologist. The clear PVC sample sleeve is cut with a saw, and a portion of the soil
sample will be extruded and'placed in a plastic bag and sealed for later screening
with an hNu type organic Vapor meter (OVM). Another portion of the extruded soil
sample will be used for classification and description. Generally, the bottom portion
of the sample will be sealed in the sample sleeve using Teflon sheets and plastic
caps;~ labeled; and promptly placed in iced storage at approximately 4°C for
transport to the laboratory. To reduce cross-contamination between samples, the
split-barrel sampler will be washed in a soap solution and double-rinsed between
each sampling event.
After the portion of the extruded soil sample is placed in the plastic bag, it will be
allowed to warm, inducing volatilization of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors. The
headspace vapors will be screened with the OVM. The highest observed reading
will be recorded on the boring logs.
Field Methods and Procedures HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
4,0 .GROUNDWATER GRAB SAMPLES
Depth to groundwater will be measured to the nearest 0.01-foot using an' electronic, -
hand, held .water level indiCator. The tip of the probe will be examined to eValuate
whether a product sheen is present. Groundwater samples will be collected from
each boring utilizing a sealed.screen·sampling tool. The stainless steel sampling
tool will be contained within the direct-push probe rods, which will be hammered
into the boring to the desired sampling depth interval. The stainless steel sampling
tool is then exposed to the ·groundwater interval by retracting the slightly larger
direct-push probe rods. '.'[o ~reduce cross-contamination between samPles, ~the
sampling tool will be washed, in a soap solution and double-rinsed between each
sampling event.
Groundwater samples will be collected from each boring or sampling interval by
utilizing Teflon tubing equipped with a check valve. The tubing will be lowered into
the interior of the sampling tool, oscillated up and down for a period of time, and
then removed from the-sampling tool resulting in a groundwater sample being
hoisted to the surface. The tubing will be cut and the groundwater samples will
then be transferred to. appropriate clean containers in such a manner as to
minimize loss of volatile constituents,, so that there is no headspace in the sample
container and air bubbles are not present in the water samples when they are
inverted. If air bubbles are found, resampling will occur. The water samples will be
refrigerated and transported promptly to the analytical laboratory. To reduce cross-
'contamination between samples, new tubing will be used to collect the groundwater
samples from each borehole or sampling interval. .,
,UNIFIED ~OIL'GLA881Fii~ATION SYSTEM
Major Division Ltr.Description' Meier ONi~I~ L~. ~scHpfion
Grovel ~ '~~~~ = 'Siia
Gr~el~ ~<50
Soils ~
' ~ Rne-
Grained .
Soils
and
Sand ~ ~~
and~~
Sandy
Soils~
High~
Soils
WELL OONOTHUOTION
sampler is ddven. Neat cement
~ Relatively undistu~ed ~ ~and pack
sample (Monterey Sand
~ sample recovered
No
Bentonite
Static water level
~' obse~ed
Blank
~C
Initial water I~el
~ obse~ed in ~ell/bo~ng
S-10 Sample number ~. Machine-slotted
· mm~ o~ an 18-4neh ~mitraUo~.
~oaxzoz~ BORBIQ LOG SYMBOL KEY
Boring NUmber: GP-- 1 ~HOI~IZON ENVIRONME1~TAL INC-
Job Number: 22006,11 --
Site Location: Bakersfield --
Drilling Company: GloboI Probe Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Drilled By: Jason Moor Sampling Method: Split Spoon Sampler
Dots Drilled: 06/03/00 Total Depth: 15 feet
Logged By: Gary Barker .... Depth To. Groundwater: No, t Encountered
Soil " Well Comments
Description Construction
asphalt ~
,, : ....... B"ckflllad 'wRh 'hydreted
bentonite.
57'.' 7
Asphalt in upper p~.r~ of
tube. SAND. fins to maoium gmlneo,
light bro~n, dry, no odor.
Sand, fine to medium groined, well
sorted, light bro~n, dry. no odor.
Aa above 'with some reddish silt
or cloy, no odor.
SAND, fine to medium grained, well
8o~ed. tan to mddlah 6town, dry,
no odor.
Terminated et 15 feet.
Pc~e 1 Of 1
Boring Number: GP--2 HOI~IZON ENVIRONMENTAL .INc.
Job Number: 22006.11- ~
Site LocoUon: Bakersfield --
Drilling Company: Global Probe Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger "
Drilled By: Jason Moor Sampling Method: Split SPoon Sampler
Dote Drilled:· 08/03/00' Total Depth: 15 feet
Logged By: Gory Barker ~ Depth To Groundwater: Not, Encountered
Soil Well Comments
· Description Construction
6' of asphalt . Backfllled with hydrated
bentonite.
No sample retained. Rubble, asphalt
and brick in sample.
Sand, fine to medium grained, well
sorted and rounded, brown, dry.
no odor.'
Aa above with some reddish silt
or clay,, no odor.
s grained, tan
no odor.
Terminat~d at. 15 feet.
Page 1 Of 1
Boring Number: GP--3 ~~. HORIZON EI~FIRONMENTAL INC.
Job Number: 22006.11 '-
Site Location: Bakersfield --
Dri'lling Company: Global Probe Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Drilled By: Jason Moor Sompling Method: Split Spoon Sampler
Date Drilled: 08/03/00 Total Depth: 10 feet
Lagged, By: Gary Barker , Depth To Groundwoter: Not Encountered
~ '- ~escr'-"on m ~ Comments .
~c. ~ o ~ a ~ oc
4-- 8 0 4~
6~ 6~
7~ 7~
9-- 9 ~nd ~ '~R, ~ fine to medlum
o gmin~ 8a~. ~n to b~, d~, no
! 16 10 0
2o-- 20 --
24-- 24 --
25-- 25 --
26-- 26 --
27~ 27 --
28-- 2B --
29 2g --
Page 1 O~ 1
Laboratories, 2 o a f[
August 31, 2000
GARY BARKER
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7
ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762
Subject: Laboratory Submission No.: 00-09061
Samples Received: 08/04/2000
Dear GARY BARKER
The samples (s) listed on the Chain of Custody report were received by BC
Laboratories, Inc. on 08/04/2000.
Enclosed please find the analytical data for the testing requested. If you
have any questions regarding this report please contact me at (661)327-4911,
ext. 250.
Any unused sample will be stored on our premises for a minimum of 30 days
(excluding bacteriologicals) at which time they will be disposed unless otherwise
requested at the time of sample receipt. A disposal fee of $5 per sample may
apply for solid sample matrices.
Please refer to submission number 00-09061 .when calling for assistance.
Sincerely,
Diane Hale
Project Coordinator
BC Laboratories, Inc.
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no respons~ility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(6611327-1918 * www.bclabs.com
B .. LABORATORIES INC. SAMPLE R~CEIPT FORM Rev. No.6 10113/.c8 Page //Of'J
"Submission #: OO'- (.~C( O~ / I Project Code: I mB Batch #
SHIPPING INFORMATION- ' ~ SHIPPING CONTAINER
Federal Express .~ UPS D Hand Delivew~ Ice Ches~ None
BC Lab Field Sewice ~ Other ~ (Specify) Box ~ Other ~ (Specify)
Refrigerant: Ice~ Blue Ice D None D Other D Comments:
Custody Seals:~~ ~~~ Non--Comments: ' ~O~
Al,:samplesreceive~? Yes~ No. All sam~es containers intact? .YesX'No~' Desc~p~onJs) matchCOC? ye~
Ice Chest ID Date~~ Ice Chest ID
, - Tempe~ur,:~°C ~ :' .,.
Tempem~re: ~C
Thermometer ID: ~ Analyst Init ~ Thermometer ID: ~ Analy~ Init
Emissivity ~ , Emissi~
Co~t~i~r
~ SAMPLE CONTAINERS ~ E NUM~
I, I.I.t.I, I. I, I,I. I~ i,, i,,I, i,I~ i. i, i. i, i, I. 1.1,, I,,
QT QENE~L M:NE~ GENE~L ~YSICAL I
PT PE UNPRESERVED
QT INORGANIC CHEMICAL M~AL~
PT INORGANIC CHEMICAL M~ALS
PT CYANIDE
PT NITROGEN FORMS
PT TOTAL SULFID~
2oz. NIT~TE / NITRi~
100mi TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
QT TO~
PT CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
100mi ~ENOLI~
40mi VOA VIAL TRAVEL B~NK
40mi VOA VIAL
QT EPA 413.1. 413.2, 418.1
PT ODOR
~DIOLOGIC~
BACTERIOLOGIC~
~ EPA 504
QT EPA 5081608/8080
QT EPA 515.1/8150
OT EPA 525
8OZ. JAR ~ .. ,uu~ ~
32 OZ. JAR
P~S~C BAG
October 13, ~ 999
Comments:
Laboratories,
Page 1
Purgeable Aromatics '
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Date Reported: 08/30'/2000 "
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7 Date Received: 08/04/2000
ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762 Laboratory No.: 00-09061'-2
Attn: GARY BARKER 916-939-2170
'Project Number: 22006.11 . Date Collected: 08/03/2000 ~ 10:20
Sampling2~ocation: BULK PLANT Date Extractedi8020: 08/09/2000
Sample. ID: GP1-7 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/09/2000
Sample Ma-~riX: Soil Dilution Used-8020: 1
Sample Collected By: GARY BARKER Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/09/2000
Date Analyzed-S015M(g): 08/09/2000
Dilution Used-S015M(g): 1
Date Extracted-S015M(d): 08/07/2000
Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 08/24/2000 ~ 21:03
Dilution Used-8015M(d): i
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected 'mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02
Total Xylenes- None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Gasol. ine Range Organics
'(C5 C14) None'Detected mg/kg 1.
Surrogate % Recovery 118. % 70-130
Diesel Range Organics
(C12 - C24) 23. mg/kg 10.
Surrogate % Recovery 103. % 37-158
TEST METHOD: .TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method --Modified EPA'8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Batch specific matrix spike recovery(s) are not within QC limits.
Accuracy verifled through LCS.
Chromatogramnot typical of diesel.
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submiffing party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661}327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com
Laboratories, Inc.
- Page 1
Purgeable Aromatics
and '·
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INc. Date Reported: 08/30/2000
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7 -- Date Received: 08/04/2000 -
ELDORADO HILLS', CA 95762 Laboratory No.: 00-09061-4
Attn: GARY BARKER 916-939-2170
Project Number: 22006.11 Date Collected: ·08/03/200'0 ~ 10:30
Sampling LOcation: BULK PLANT Date Extracted-8020: 08/09/2000
Sample ID: GP1-15 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/09/2000
sample Matrix: Soil Dilution Used-S020: 1
Sample. Collected By: GARY BARKER Date Extracted-S015M(g): 08/09/2000
Date Analyzed-S015M(g): 08/09/2000
Dilution Used-8015M(g): 1
Date Extracted-8015M(d): 08/07/2000
Date Analyzed-S015M(d): 08/24/2000 ~ 19:11
Dilution Used-8015M(d): i
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
'Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mt/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene · None Detected mt/kg 0.005
Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mt/kg 0.02
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Gasoline Range Organics
(C5 C14) None Detected mt/kg 1.
Surrogate % Recovery 88. % 70-130
Diesel Range Organics
(C12 C24} 19. mt/kg 10.
Surrogate % Recovery 157; % 37-158
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Batch specific matrix spike recovery(s) are not within QC limits.
Accuracy verified through LCS.
Chromatogram not typical of diesel.
Stuart O. Buttram
Department Superwisor
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submlttJng party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third pan'y interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661 )327-1918 * www.bclabs.com
Laboratorie. ,
Page 1
Purgeable Aromatics
Total Petroleum. Hydrocarbons
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7 Date Received: 08/04/2000-
ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762 Laboratory No.: 00-09061-5
Attn: GARY BARKER . 916-939-2170
Project-Number: 22006.11 Date Collected: '08/03/2000 · 11:00
Sampling L6~a~ion::' .BULK PLANT Date Extracted-8020: 08/11/2000
Sample ID': ..... GP2-7 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/11/2000
Sample Matrix: Soil Dilution Ueed-8020: 1
Sample Coliected B¥: GARY BARKER Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/11/2000
Date Analyzed-S015M(g): 08/11/2000
Dilution Used-8015M(g): 1
Date Extracted-8015M(d): 08/07/2000
Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 08/25/2000 ~ 00:20
Dilution Used-8015M(d): i
Practical
Analysis RePorting Quantitation
Constituent's Results Unite Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02
Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Gasoline Range Organics
(C5 - C14) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Surrogate % Recovery 93. % 70-130
Diesel Range Organics
(C12 - C24) 13. mg/kg 10.
Surrogate % Recovery 121. % 37-158
TEST METHOD: TPH b~ D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual conetituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Batch epecific matrix spike recovery(s) are not within QC limite.
Accuracy verified through LCS.
Chromatogram not typical of dieeel.
/~~%1186
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for the excJusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or thirO party interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * {6611327-4911 * Fax(6611327-1918 * www.bciabs.com
Laboratories, it, C.
Page 1
Purgeable Aromatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7 Date Received: 08/04/2000
ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762 Laboratory No.: 00-09061-7
Attn: GARY BARKER 916-939-2170
Project Number: 22006.11 Date Collected: 08/0'3/2000 ~ 11:15
Sampling Location:. BULK PLANT Date Extracted-8020: 08/09/2000
Sample ID: GP2-15 Date Analyzed- 8020: 08/09/2000
Sample Matrix: Soil Dilution Used-8020: 1
Sample Collected By: GARY BARKER Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/09/2000
Date Analyzed- 8015M (g): 08/09/2000
Dilution Used- 8015M(g): 1
Date Extracted-8015M(d): 08/07/2000 ·
'Date Analyzed-S015M(d): 08/24/2000 · 18:43
Dilution Used- 8015M (d): I
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methyl-t-butylether .. None Detected mg/kg 0.02
Total Xylenes. None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Gasoline .Range Organics
(C5 - C14) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Surrogate % Recovery 99. % 70-130
Diesel Range Organics
(C12 - C24) None Detected mg/kg 10.
Surrogate % Recovery 110. % 37-158
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Batch specific matrix spike recovery(s) are not within QC limits.
Accuracy verified through LCS.
StUart O. Buttram
Department Supervisor
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of t~e submitting party, BC Laborato~s, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * ¢661}327-4911.* Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com
Laboratories, inc. "
Page 1
purgeableArcmatics
and
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000
5011 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PKWY ST.7 Date Received: 08/04/2000-
ELDORADO HILLS, CA 95762 Laboratory No.: 00-09061-9
Attn: GARY BARK~R 916-939-2170
Project Number: · 22006.11 Date Collected: 08/03/2000 ~ 11:35
Sampling Location: BULK PLANT Date Extracted-8020: 08/09/2000
Sample ID: GP3-10 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/09/2000
SampleMatrix: Soil Dilution Used-8020: 1
Sample Collected By: C4%RYBARKER Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/09/2000
Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/09/2000
Dilution Used-S015M(g): 1
Date Extracted-S015M(d): 08/07/2000
Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 08/24/2000 ~ 19:11
Dilution Used-8015M(d): I
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantitation
Constituents Results Units Limit
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02
Total Xylenes . None Detected mg/kg 0.01
Gasoline Range Organics
(C5 C14) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Surrogate % Recovery 96. % 70-130
Diesel Range Organics
· (C12 C24). 11. mg/kg 10.
Surrogate % Recovery 103. % 37-158
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Batch specific matrix spike recovery(s) are not within QC limits.
Accuracy verified through LCS.
Chromatogram not typical of diesel.
Calif¢ #1186
Stuart G. But~ram
Department Supervisor
All results listad in this report ara for the exclusive use of the subm~ng party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no respon$ibil~ for rapofl alteration, detachment or third party interpretation.
4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * ('661}327-491 ~1 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com
~.z ~,'..~ ~, ,,~ ~ ,~ ~_ ,~ aa, ~,...~ ~....~ ~ P.O. BOX 2243 . TOll Free: (888) 753-7553
·. : Huntington Beach, CA 92647 FAX: (714) 640-1584
Laboratory RepOrt
clleat: Horizon Environmental, Inc. Relx~t Dat~ 6/14/00
Client Address: 5011 Golden Foothill Parkway Lab Project #umben 00352-2
El. DOrado.Hills, California client Project Numbec... 22004-13
Project Narn~ Tosco Bulk- Bakersfield Dates Sanl~ed: 6/13/00
Bakemr~, California Bates ~ 6/13/00
C°ntact: Gary Barker 8ample Matrix: Soil
Analyses Requested:
1.~ EPA M8015 - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
2.. EPA M8015- Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
3. EPA 8020 - Volatile Aromatics (BTEX) with MTBE
On June 13, 2000, Baseline rece'rved samples from the project shown above. A Chain-of-Custody Record is
attached.
Baseline analyzed the samples for the parameters shown above per the Chain-of-Custody. In this report,
Baseline presents the results and a QA/QC summary for these analyses.
Approved
Brian K Kato, Laboratory Manager
Page I
~. ~_~1~.~. ~W~A, · ~' ~,- ~"~ · · ~,~ Baseline O~e Anal~
r ~ P.O. ~x ~43 Toll F~: (~) 75~75~
Hunfi~on ~a~, ~ 9~7 F~ (714) ~1~
Laboratory Report
Client: Horizon Environmental, Inc. Report Datm 6/14100
Client Address= 5011 Golden Foothill Parkway ' Lab ProJect Numben. 00352-2
El Dorado Hills, California Client ProJe~ #und)en. 22004-13
Bakersfield, California . Dates Analyzed: 6/13/00
Contact: Gary Barker 8ample Matrix: Soil
EPA M8015/8020 Analysis Results
Parameter. TPH-Diesel TPH-Gasoline MTBE Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes
Method: M8015 M8015 8020 8020 8020 8020 8020
Units: (mci/kal ..... (mo./ka) ~(moAq) (mc~/ka) (ma/kq) (m_ct/ka~ (mc~/kq)
Sample ID
HBla-8 ND<10 ND<I ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005
H2-5 ND<10 ND<I ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005
Method Blank ND<10 ND<I ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005 ND<0.005
ND: Not detected at the indicated reporting limit
Page 2
E-.-J ~- ~...-~ m m ~_.,~ 6- ~-~,~ ~.-~...~ ~.-~ ~.~ P.O. Box 2243 Toll Free: (888) 753-7553
Huntington Boac~. CA 92647 FAX: (714) 840-1584
Laboratory Report
~ -Horizon Environmental, Inc. ~ Dat~ 6/14100
Clle~~ 5011 Golden Foo~ill Parkway I.ab~Namben 00352-2.
· El Dorado Hills, California Clleat ~ Nambe~. 22004-13
Contacl: Gary Barker Sample Matrix: Soil
Quality Control Summary
-~ MS . MSD
Recovery Recovery RPD QC
Analytes (%) .(%) (%) Sample
TPH - Diesel (Modified EPA 8015) 85 90 6 H2-5 -
TPH - GaS°line (Modified EPA 8015) 97 95 2 H2-5
Toluene (EPA 8020A) 97 96 1 H2-5
Total Xylenes (EPA 8020A) 98 95 3 H2-5
Acceptable QC 'Limits: "(65-130) (65-130) (0-30)
MS: Matdx Spike; MSD: Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD: Relative Percent Difference
Page3
:)reject Nam® . . CiMIN-OF-GUSTOD Y
Horizon Environmental, Inc. ' Tosco Bulk- Bakersfield Analysis
5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, ste 7 ~"'~^~' ~ ~ ~' ~ Page I of 1
-
El Dorado Hills, California 95762 Bakersfield, California ; '~ ~ ~ ._. ~. Laboratory Project #:
Phone;916.939.9217' FAX: 916,939.2172 Proj~Number
, 22oo4- 3 00352-2
Contact: Gary D: Barker To~o~a.~ ~ o .~
Jim Adams .~ . . m
- ~. o. ~ >o :~ Comments
Sample ID Sample Location Date Time ID ~ I- ~. m
HBla-8 13-Jun-00 1 S X X X 1
H2-5' 13-dun-00 2 S X X X 1
Turnaround Time: On-Site Mobile Laboratory; samples were relinquished at the date(s)/times shown above.
Sample Condition: Chilled? Y I N Sealed? Y ! N Comments:
Relinquished by Gary Barker Received by Brian Kate Special Instructions:
of TRC Alton Geoscience of Baseline Analytical Sea-vices
· k~'a ~.~' '-Be ~,, P.O. Box 2243 Phone: (888) 753-7553
................ ----"--'"' Huntington Beach, California 92647 FAX: (714) 840-1584
Pmject Name
Horizon Environmental, Inc. ' CJ~JlN-OF-CUSTODY'
TOSCO Bulk- Bakersfield Analysis RECORD
5011 Golden Foothill Parkway, Ste 7 ""~^~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ E Page 1 of 1
El Dorado Hills, California 95762 Bake~field, Califo~ia ~ : ~
Phone:916. 9. 17; F~:916.~9.2172 ~Num. g $ O 00352'2
Conta~: Ga~ D; Ba~er T~
Jim Adams
S~plelD Sample L~aon Date ~me ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ Comments
HBla-8 l~Jun-O0 ~ S X X X 1
H2-5 13~un-O0 2 S X: X X '1
Turnaround Time: O~SEe Mobib ~mto~; ~mpl~ ~re relinqu~h~ at ~e date(s)~imes sh~ a~ve.
Sample C~d~: · C~II~? Y I N S~I~ Y I N Comm~:
Relinquished by Ga~ Ba~er Re~ived by BHan Kato Special IntruSions:
of TRC Alton ~eosc~en~ of Baseline Ana!vtical Se~ices
~ee ~ Phone: {888) 753-7553
.~ ............... -~ Huntington Beach, California 92647 'F~: {714) 840-1584
TANK CLOSURE AND
PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
for
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
524 Dolores Street
Bakersfield, California
I prepared for
UNOCAL CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AND TECHNOLOGY
I
prepared by
GeoResearch
a Division of GEOSERVICES
a California Corporation
3437 Empressa Drive, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
(805) 546-9100
April 29, 1994
GeoResearch Project 9460602100
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY' ' i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1,0 ·INTRODUCTION .................................. . ........... 1
2,0 SITE BACKGROUND " 1
'1 3.0 PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES ' ~ 1
· 3,! GEOGRAPHIC SETTING ' 1
. .3.2 'REGIONAL AND LOCAL GEOLOGY ' 2
I 3~3' GROUND~WATER CHARACTERISTICS ' ' ' 2
4,0 FIELD. PROCEDURES ,., " ' 3
'1 " 4,1 UST REMOVAL ........................................ 3
- 4.2 SOIL SAMPLING . ...................................... -' 3
I .4:3LABORATORY ANALYSES .................... - ............ 4
5.0 LABORATORY RESULTS ' ~ 5
I 6,0-BACKFILL AND COMPACTION 5
i 7.0 CONCLUSIONS .... ~ .................... , ..................... 6
8.0 REFERENCES . .... . ......................................... 7
I , FIGURES
Figure 1- Project Location
I Figure 2: Site Plan
Figure 3: Locations of Samples Collected Beneath the Underground Storage
Tanks
I Figure 4: Locations-of Samples Collected from Stockpiled Soil
I : TABLES
Table 1:~ Laboratory Analyses'-For samples Collected Beneath the
· ' Underground Storage-Tanks
~ -Table 2: Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected Beneath the
~- . Underground Storage Tanks
!' I Table 3: Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected from Stockpiled Soil
' ~ APPENDICES
I Appendix A: Tank Removal Permit '
Appendix B: Rinseate Manifest '
Appendix C: Tank Disposal Forms,
I' Appendix-D: Sampling Procedures
GeoResearch
Soil
Appendix E: Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Documentation
i Appendix F: Soil Compaction Reports
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Information provided in this' report for GeoResearch Project 9460602100 is intended
exclusively fo~: Un6cal Corporate Environmental 'Remediation and Technology for_the
evaluation of petroleUm hydrocarbons as it pertains to the~ subject property. The
professional services provided have been performed in accordance.with .practices
generally accepted by Other. geOlogists, hydrologists, hydrogeo!ogists, engineers land
environmental scientists working in this field. No other warrantY, either expressed or
implied, is made. As with all subsurface inVestigations,~ there is-no guarantee that the'
work cOnducted will identify any and all sources or locations of contamination.
This report is iSSued-With the' understanding' that Unocal CorPorate Environmental
Remediati°n and TechnolOgy is responsible fOr ensuring the informatiOn contained herein
is' brought to the attention of the appropriate regulatory agency. This report~has been
reviewed by a geologist Who is registered in the State of California and Whose signature
and'license-number appear below. . . -~
Carolyn/~. Walch, RG 4011 ~X.~.~~/~.~///
Senior. Geologist -. ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
~Unocal Refining and Marketing, Inc.. (Unocal) elected to remove the underground storage
tanks (USTs) from the Unocal Bulk Fueling.Terminal'0959. at 524 Dolores Street,
Bakersfield, California (Figure 1).' These storage facilities included five USTs of 20,000-
· gallon capacity and one UST of 10,000-gallon capacity that were used to store gasoline,-
diesel and/or motor oil. In. addition, one UST of 550-gallon capacity formerly used to
I store waste oil was removed. Following the removal of the. USTs; a
preliminary
inveStigation was conducted'that included coll~ctingSoil samples for laboratory analyses
from beneath each end the former USTs and from .stockpiled soil that had been
excavated from the tops and sides of the USTs.
. The results of field testing .during the prelimi'nary~investigation indicated that soil beneath
I 10,000-gallon at the northwest corner of the UST pit contained volatile
the
former
UST
petroleum-hydrocarbons. -Soil in this area was excavated to approximately 35 feet below
i ground surface and a soil sample was collected at this depth. The laboratory analyses
of this sample detected UP to 2,000 milligramsper kilogram (mg/kg)'total petroleum
hydrocarbons. Chromatographic analyses of the sample indicated that it is non-diesel
iand non,gas.and has a carbon range between C10 and C16. These carbon values may
be indicative of weathered diesel. Laboratory analyses of samples collected beneath the
remaining USTs detected a maximum of 40 mg/kg total petroleum hydrocarbons.
Laboratory analyses of soil samples collected from stockpiled soil that was excavated
from above and around the.20,000-gallon USTs..detected total recoverable petroleum
hydrocarbons (TRPH) ranging from below the detection limit'of_15-m~kg to!240 mg/kg...
?
Stockpiled soil that was excavated from above and around the 20,000-gallon USTs and
clean imported sOil were used to backfill the-UST'excavation. The portions of stockpiled
· ~ soil Containing TRPH concentrations '.greate. r:. than 100_ mg/kg,were-used to backfill the
.Overexcavated. _are. a at the_northwest corner of the UST Pit,, Backfill soil was compacted
to at least 90 per cent. Soil rem°Ved .from the northwest corner of the UST excavation
that was Stained Was stockpiled on the northeast Portion of the property between sheets
of plastic-pending determination of remediation and/or disposal alternatives.
I
!
· .-'-. 1.0 Ir~TRODUCTION "-
I Unocal Refining and Marketing,.Inc. '(UnOCal) elected to remove the underground storage
. tanks (USTS) from the. Unocal'Bulk Fueling Terminal 0959 at-524 Dolores Street,
Bakersfield, California (Figure 1). These storage facilities included five. USTs of 20,000-
gallon capacity (USTs H220, H221, H222, H223 and H224) and one UST of 10,000-gallon
capacity (UST H328). These USTs formerly were used to store gasoline, diesel and/or
I . - motor oil. One UST of 550-gallon capacity (UST H225) formerlY used to storewaste oil
also was removed. Activities associated With the UST remOval were .conducted during
March and April, 1994. Following the removal of the USTs, a preliminary investigati(~n
I was conducted that included collecting soil samples for laboratOry analyses from beneath
the former USTs. Soil ;samples for laboratory analyses also were collected from
'· stockpiled soil that had been~excavated from the tops and sides-of the USTs. The
purpose of this report is to summarize the activities associated with the UST removal and
provide documentation of the laboratory results, UST and rinseate disposal and backfilling
and compaction of the UST pit.
i 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND
The 10,000- and 20,000'gallon USTs at the site were installed in 1956. Between 1956
.~. and 1992,. Unocal used the property for the bulk transfer of fuel and/or motor oil for
distribution to other facilities. In November, 1992, the facility operations were leased to
Grapevine Oil Co., Inc. and the contents of all the USTs were pumped out. The fill ports
i to the. USTs were locked and the USTs remained empty_ up to the time of removal in
March and April, 1994. Grapevine Oil Company currently uses the property for storage
and transfer of 55-gallon-drums containing petroleum Products.
':3.0 PHYSIOGRaPHiC FF_.~IURES
3.1 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING
The City of Bakersfield is in the southern San Joaquin Valley which is part of the Great
Valley of California. In this area, the San Joaquin Valley is bounded on the east by the
Sierra Nevada Mountains, the south by the Tehachapi Mountains and the west by the
TemblOr Range. North of.Bakersfield, the valley stretches approximately 400 miles to
Red Bluff. Runoff from the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains drains into the Kern River
I which flows through the north of Bakersfield. Terminus for the Kern River is Buena
part
Vista Lake on the west side of the valley.
TopograPhy of the San JOaquin .Valley is almost flat. and much of the. valley floor to the
. · north is .OnlY slightly above sea level. In the Baker_sfleld area, the elevatiOn is higher,
averaging about 400 feet above mean sea level (msl). At'the Project site, the elevation
is 411 feet above msl and the topographic gradient slopes very gently to_wards the south;
I . southwest (United States Geological Survey, 1954).
I 3.2' REGIONAL AND LOCAL GEOLOGY '
The San Joaquin yalley encompasses the southern portion'Of the Great Valley
I ' Ge0morphic Province of California. Geologically, the Great Valley is a large elongate
northwest-trending asymmetric structural trough that has.been filled with a thick sequence
of sediments ranging from Jurassic to Recent in age (Hackle, 1966). The eastern shelf
I of this Synclinal trough is the subsurface continuation of theSierran and the
granitic
slope
western flank of the trough is expressed by the upturned edges of the basin sediments.
The trough, or basin, is interrupted by two cross-valley structures. 'The northernmost
I structure is the Stockton Fault in the Stockton arch which is
the
boundary
separating
the
Sacramento sub-basin from the San Joaquin sub-basin. The other cross-valley structure
is the White Wolf Fault in the Bakersfield arch which is in.the southernmost part of the
I .valley (Norris and Webb, 1990).
Sedimentary 'fill of the. southern portion of the Great Valley in the Bakersfield area
'~ includes up to 12,000 feet of marine and non-marine sandstones, Siltstones,' claystones
and conglomerates with lesser amounts of tuff and diatomite. These rocks range in-age
I from Cretaceous to Pliocene and Were deposited over Mesozoic-age Sierran granitic
basement (Hackel, 1966). Overlying the Pliocene deposits are loosely consolidated to
unconsolidated Pleistocene and Recent-age alluvial sands and conglomerates.
I Sediments immediately underlying the project site include Recent-age stream deposited
clay,, sand and conglomerate derived from erosion in the Sierra Nevada Mountains east
of the site (Smith, 1964).
3.3 GROUND-WATER CHARACTERISTICS .-
'Ground .water resOurces in the San Joaquin Valley primarilY are within the Pliocene,
Pleistocene and Recent-age alluvial sediments (Poland and Evenson, 1966). In the
Bakersfield area, wells produce water from alluvial sediments at depths between 100 and
-500 feet below ground surface (bgs). The Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) maintains
-records of Precipitation, surface and ground water for member water districts and
I ~publishes an-annual "Water Supply Report"-(KCWA, 1 Based the Water
993).
on
Supply
. Report' published December, 1993, two wells penetrate the unconfined aquifer
I 'approximately one mile north and northeast of the prOject site.' Data shown on maps of
the. unConfined iaquifer indicate that the depth to ground water in the site vicini{y is
approximately 190 ,feet.bgs. These maps also suggest that the direction of grOund-water
fiew is towards the south and SoUthwest (KCWA, 1993)..' The report indicates that grOUnd
-water in this area Contains total; dissolved Solids at concenti'ations of approximately 500
parts per milli°ni~ --' . ' "- ..
'4.0 FIELD PROCEDURES
P ' ' , -g ~. , -g ' STs used to store
20~) on allo gaSoline,.-
diesel and/or motor oil and one 550-gallbn UST used to store.waste oil were removed
frbm the project site by B & T Servi.~ Station Maintenance, Inc., of Arroyo Grande,
California. The fuel and motor oil US'I;s were constructed of steel and the waste-oil UST
was conStructed of fiberglass. Prior~/to remOval, the USTs were triple rinsed and the
· rinseate was transported to Gibson/Environmental in Bakersfield, California. With the
.exception of the waste-oil UST, th/e tanks were transported to Golden State Metals in
Bakersfield, California for-diSposa~ The waste-oil UST was broken.Up on siteand, with
the approval of the'-Ker~ county ~ Department, transported to the Arvin Class III landfill
for disposal. 'Copies of the tank removal permits are in Appendix A. A copy of the
hazardous waste manifest for the rinseate is in Appendix B and copies of the
documentation of UST destructiOn and disposal are in Appendix C.
Soil excavated from aboveand around the USTs was field screened for the presence of
volatile organic compounds Using an organic vapor-analyzer (OVA). Based on values
obtained'from OVA screening, excavated soil that did not contain volatile organic
compounds was stockpiled-on th(~ east side of the UST pit. Excavatedsoil that contained
' detectable concentrations of organic volatile' compounds was stockpiled on plastic on the
northeast-Portion of the site.-
--4.2 SOIL SAMPLING-- '~ _
'Messrs. 'Mark Turk and Howard Wines of the' Bakersfield City Fire Department,
Hazardous Materials Division were on site during the UST removal operatiOns. Following.
-removal of all USTs from the site, Mr. Turk directed the. collection of soil samples from
beneath the former USTs. With the exception of-the nor{h end of the former 10,000-
gallon UST, an excavator was used to excavate sell
and
collect
samples
from
2
and
6
feet below the ends of each of the 20,000-gallon USTs and the south end of the 10,000-
gallon UST and from 2-and 6 feet beneath the center of the former waste-oil UST (Figure
........ ' "' ' : ~-. ' ' ' ~: '"' ~ ........
'3). In addition, a s°ii sample was collected at 2 feet below the north end of the former-
10,000-gallon UST (H-328). BecaUse soil staining and field screening suggested that
Concentrations of petroleUm hydrocarbons may be present in soil in this area, the
eXCavation was continued to approximately 23 feet belowthe bottom of the former .UST-
(35 feet bgs) and a soil sample was collected at this depth. In addition, one sample was
collected at approximately 14 feet bgs from the north sidewall adjacent to this UST.
Upon the consent of' Mr. Turk, samples were collected from-~he Soil removed from above
and around the 20,000-gallon USTs that was stockpiled on the east. side of the UST pit
(Figure 4). The stockpiled soil-was divided into a grid~containing twelve cells with each
cell representing approximately 50 cubic yards of Soil. Samples were collected at random
locations within each cell. A Sample also was collected from the stockpiled soil ~removed
from above and around the former waste-oil UST. GeoResearCh procedures for collecting
soil samples during UST removal activities are in Appendix D.
4.3 LABORATORY ANALYSES
All soil samples collected from beneath the former USTs were analyzed for total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). In addition, select samples were analyzed
recoverable
for~total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-D), total petroleum hydrocarbons as
gasoline (TPH-G), and benzenel toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) based
on the former contents of each UST. The historical contents of the USTs and the
shownlab°rat°rY-in~Tableanalysesl, that were conducted for samples collected beneath each UST are
The :sample collected at 14 feet bgs from the sideWall north of the former 10,000-gallon
UST was analyzed for TRPH, TPH-D, TPH-G, and BTEX. The samples collected from
~the stockpiled soil were analyzed for TRPH. Analyses for TPH-G, BTEX and TPH-D were
not conducted on the samples collected from the stockpile because volatile hydrocarbons
were not detected by the OVA during exCavation of these soils, the former contents of the
20,000-gallon USTs primarily .were motor Oil, and Concentrations of TPH-D, TPH-G or
BTEX were verY Iow or not detected in select samples collected from beneath the USTs
from wh!ch these soils were excavated..
Analyses for TRPH were conducted in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) .Method 418.1 'and TPH-D analyses were conducted in accordance with
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 3550/8015. Analyses for TPH-G and
BTEX were conducted in accordance with EPA Methods 3050/8015/8020. All samples
were analyzed, by GEOTEST, a California-certified laboratory in Long Beach, California.
' 'P::" 5.0 LABORATORY RESULTS ~
~"Analgtic~i results~of' the soil samples collected from beneath the former USIS are
summariZed-in Table 2.' The results of samples collected from stockpiled soil are
summarized in Table 3. The. laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are
in AppendiX E. .. -
The analytical results indicate that TRPH concentrations of 3,600 milligrams per kilogram
(mg/kg) were detected in the sample collected at approximately 14 feet bgs beneath the
north end of former. UST H-328 (2 feet below the bottom of the usT pit). Concentrations
I ~t of TRPH at 2,000 mg/kg were'detected in the sample collected at 23 feet beneath the
· north end of this UST (35 feet bgs). In addition, concentrations of TPH-D at 8,400 and
1,700 mg/kg and TPH-G at 6,800 and'l,000 rog/kg were detected in the samples
collected beneath the north end of UST H-328. The laboratory, reSults indicated that the
'petroleum hydrocarbons detected during the TPH-D and TPH-G analyses were non-diesel
and non-gas with a carbon range of approximately C10 to C16. According to information
provided by Sequoia Analytical Laboratories, carbon values in this 'range most likely are
indicative of weathered diesel.. BTEX were not detected in the samples.
'Concentrations of TRPH i:anging from 15 to 19 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were
· detected in samples collected beneath former UST H-222 and beneath the north end of
former UST H-223. Concentrations of TRPH at 15 and 40 rog/kg also were detected in
the samples collected beneath the former waste-oil UST.
· Concentrations of TRPH in samples collected from stockpiled soil 'eXcavated from above
and around the 20,000-gallon USTs ranged from ~20 to 240 mg/kg. Concentrations of
TRPH at 360 mg/kg were detected in the stockpiled soil removed from above and around
I the former-waste-oil·UST. Samples collected from the stained stockpiled soil excavated
-' ._ from around and beneath the north end of former- UST H-328 (10,000-gallon UST) were
not analyzed. ..
i
6.0 BACKFILL AND COMPACTION
Upon completion of soil sampling and analyses 'and with the verbal app!;oval of the
Bakersfield City Fire Department, the UST excavations were backfilled With the soil
stockpiled on the east side of the excavation (Figure 4) and clean imported soil. At the
request of Bakersfield City Fire Department, stockpiled soil that contained concentrations
of TRPH exceeding 100 mg/kg was placed in the excavated area on the north end. of the
former 10,000-gallon UST (northwest corner of the UST pit). The remainder of the
stockpiled soil was used 'to backfill the UST excavation up to 6 feet bgs and ..clean
imported soil was used to backfill the excavation from 6 feet bgs to ground surface. The
waste-oil UST pit. also was backfilled With clean imported soil. The backfill 'waS-.
I compacted and compaction testing was conducted by Twinning Laboratories Of
Bakersfield, California.. Based on the compaction tests, backfill soil Placed in the UST.pit
~.. .. WaS.compacted to at least 90 per cent. The compaction test-report.is in Appendix F.
I
The stockpiled soil excav~ited from the northWest portion of the UST. pit (beneath the
nOrth end of the 10,000~gallon UST) and frOm the waste-Oil UST pit was stockpiled at the
I '~ northeast- corner of the proPertY between sheets-of plastic pending disposal and/or
remediation alternatives
I " ' " 7.0 CONCLUSIONS.
i *- Soil samplescollectedat ~35 feet bgs beneath the north end of the former 10,000-
gallon UST'(UST H-328) contained concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons, up
't_o_ 2,000 rog/kg; Chromatographic analyses of this soil indicated is it non-diesel
I
' and non-gas with a carbon range between C10 and C16. These values' may be-
indicative of weathered diesel.
· * Concentrations at a maximum of 40 mg/kg'TRPH were detected in select samples
· - collected beneath former USTs H-222 and H.-223 and the former waste-oil UST
I
· Stockpiled soil that was excavated from above and around the 20,000-gallon USTs
:. ~' was used to backfill the UST excavation along with clean imported soil.
· .:. ~ stOCkPiled soil containing concentrations'-greater than 100. mg/kg TRPH was used
..· as backfill fOr the overexcavated area at the northwest corner of the UST pit where
-I " stained Soil had been r?moved.
· Backfill soil was compacted to at least 90 per cent,
I
I
:.' t'
I Hackel, .Otto, 1966, ~"Su.rn~mary of the Geology of the Great Valley," in Geolo.qy of
.- Northern California: California Division of Mines and Geology, ' Bulletin 190, pp.
Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), December, 1993, "Water Sdpply Report, 1992," 80 PP.
Norris, Robert M. and Webb,' Robert W., i990, Geolo_qv of California: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 541 pp.
Poland,~ J:. F., and R~ E. Evenson, 1966, "Hydrogeology and Land Subsidence, Great Central Valley, California," in Geology of Northern California: California Division
I of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 190, pp. 239-247.
Smith, Arthur R., 1964, Compiler, in Geologic Atlas of California, Bakersfield. Sheet:
I California Division of Mines and Geology.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1954, 7.5 Minute Series Topographic May, Lamont Quadrangle, Photorevised 1968 and.1973.
FIGURES
I o ~/2 ~
I GeoResearch
REFERENCE: U.S.G.S.. TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE UNOCAL BULK FUELING 'TERMINAL 0959 .
7.5 MINUTE SERIES 524 DOLORES STREET
I OILDALE, CAUFORNIA 1954 BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA
OIL CENTER, CAUFORNIA 195~ GEORESEARCH PROdECT 9460602100
GOSFORD, CAEFORNIA 1954
LAMONT, CAEFORNIA 1954 OATE: 3/17/94 ICKD BY: FIGURE NO.,'
I FILE NO:, PROdI.OC DRAWN BY'. RSM
I
LEGEND "
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY , , APPROXIMATE LlUlTS OF UST
I __,{ I EXCAVATIONS
r-- ...... :'---x~'XT'--~'--x--"x-'--x'--x--'-x-~×~x-'-x'~x~'x-'--x~×~-~' ~'~ ~' '~ ~- ~ ....... : ...... ~ NUMBER AND LOCATION OF REMOVED
/
[ 7.7.]7.].7..T.7.7.:].-..:.-.].7.: · ..
:4.:. ~].- ~"~ -.~ "~.
LL] J ' '~' ': :1 1: :: I 1: :
· : :. t ,, I., I .... I ·
:: :: '* :: : L.~
rY' I x .... :: :: :
J_... \ :: :: :: ..
\ ................................... Itl
\ TOP- LLJ
~- ............. LOADING rY
U") } GRAVEL RACK }~
r~ A/¢ Cr~
< I PA~NG
I A/C OFFICE BUILDING
] PARKING AREA AND
WAREHOUSE
- \, /
\A/C DRIVEWAY/ DOLORES STREET I
0 20 40 80
· I
SCALE IN FEET
OeoRese rch
i SITE PLAN
i uUocA, .uu< ~-,.o ~..,.,. 0o5. _
i I 5:24 OOLOR£S b-'TIbET
m I ! .~E. SnE~.
m t! GEORESEARCH PROJECT 9480802100
m 4x ,/94 I ch-o ny: l nm.E .o: 2
I riLE Ne 0959 I I oR^Wa .'e. RSU
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY
_EGEND
H_22h ~: '
I t I APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF UST
l. .......... I I E~XCAVATiONS
WASTE-OIL
'-:~("1 ' ' ~ .............. ~ NUMBER AND LOCATION OF REMOVED
!?X--!, UST ! .............. ! USTs
. ' ........... ~ NSW-14 x ~ NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION
' WO-2 r ....-x ...... -,2-23R.=2. .... -2-2T[q-=2- 220N-,2 OF SOIL SAMPLES
I
BARREL WO--6 328N---2. .................. 22..3N..:..6 ............. 221.bl.-:-:-..6 .............
STORAGE 3~8N--13 x X
) .o 224N-~ 222N-~. ::220N-B
?
I I I I I
· gRAVEL Ix : X
AREA x ........... 225S-~ ::221 S- P.::
T x ...................................... :: ..........................
xx 224S-2 222S-2 220S-2
xx,2,_2_4_S_-T 6 222S-6 220S-6 TOP-
LOAD IN G
RACK
,,. 0 10 20 ,40
SCALE IN FEET
< A/C 0F~ICE BUILDING
R h
E: PARKING AREA AND WAREHOUSE
,, eo E SE G FC
o. UST AItEA SHOWING LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLES
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 09,59
524 DOLORES STREET
· BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA
GEORESEARCH PROJEC'f 9460602100
BY: FIGURE NO: ~
FiLE No: )959-3 DRAGON BY: RSM
WASTE-OIL UST PIT H-225 ~ APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF UST
(~/ASTE-OIL E'XCAVATIONS
UST) :i PROPERTY BOUNDARY-
F"- :...-i SP1-A SP2-A SP3-A SP4--A ~ ( ,~,~ ~ USTs
] I :-~--::..~/.::..~--::'-~--::'-~..::-'~--: x x x x '~ LOCATION OF STOCKPILED SOIL
I !,~ i~ ii ~i ii E i SHOWING LOCATION OF SOIL SAMPLES
',~ ': :: ~ :: ~ :: ,- :: o: x SP5-A CORNER OF
I : I :' ~" ~ ::~ :: -~. :: e4 :
:_:: ,_::: ~..~..~..~. x j j
LLI J '~-"TM"~ "~ "I" ' UST PIT
· .'I '- :: '- :: :
__
x TOP- IJ_l
x_ ............ j LOADING SP4-B i FY'
U3 j. GRAVEL SOIL RE RACK
LLI J AREA FROM NORTHWE. ST · SP1-B SP3-B ( I---
FI~ CORNER OF ; A/C or}
~ J UST PIT PAVING
-J SP2-B ' Z
I "
A/C OFFICE BUILDING
j ~ PARKING AREA WAREHOusEAND
J _
~, , /l k ~ ~ SIDEWALK i DIRT
"\A/C DRIVEWAY / DOLORES '-'TREET: ,
D 20 4O 80
; ~ I
SCALE IN FEET
OeoRese<srch
ILOCATION OF SAMPLES COLLECTED
. .~ ' FROM STOCKPILED SOIL
I U NOCA. L~EiUi.;K_FUi~H N 0 _,ri~NiiNi~L_0959
524 DOLORES STREET
BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA
GEORESEARCH PRO~IECT 9460802100
CKD BY: FIGURE NO:. 4
RLE NO:. 59 DRAGON BY:
TABLES
m TABLE 1
LABORATORY ANALYSES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED
m ~ BENEATH THE FORMER UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
m 524 Dolores street, Bakersfield, California
GeoResearch Project 9460602100
m UST #, VOLUME NO. Of ANALYSES SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS
AND CONTENTS SAMPLES DEPTHS
m TPHG TPHD TRPH (in feet)
BTEX
· m H-225, 550-Gallon 2 X 2 Beneath Center of
(waste oil) 6 UST
H-328, 10,000- 4 X X X 2 Beneath Each End of
m Gallon (Gasoline, 6 UST
Diesel & Oil)
I H-221, H-222, H- 12 X 2 Beneath Each End of
224, 20,000-Gallon 6 UST
(Oil Only - 3 UST)
m H-223, 20,000- 4 x x 2 Beneath Each End of
Gallon (Diesel and § UST
Oil- I US'F)
I H-220, 20,000- 4 X X X 2 Beneath Each End of
Gallon (Gasoline, 6 UST
Diesel & Oil - 1
m UST)
NOTES: UST = Underground Storage Tank
m TPHG/BTEX = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline/
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes
TPHD = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
m TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons ··
m
m
m
m
TABLE 2 '
LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOlE SAMPLES COLLECTED APRIL 1, 1994
FROM BENEATH THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California ...
· GeoResearch Project 9460602100
SAMPLE
SAMPLE DEPTH
ID (ft bgs) TRPH TPH-D TPH-G B T E X
220S-2 14 ND 1.6 ND ND ND ND ND
220S-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
220N-2 14 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
220N-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
221S-2 14 ND ............
221S-6 18 ND ............
221N-2 14 ND ............
221N-6 18 ND
222S-2 14 ND ........ . · --. -..
222S-6 18 15 ............
222N-2 14 19 ............
222N-6 18 ND ............
223S-2 14 ND ND ..........
223S-6 18 ND ND ..........
223N-2 14 19 ND ..........
223N-6 18 ND 2.7~ ..........
224S-2 14 N D ............
224S-6 18 ND ............
224N-2 14 ND ............
224N-6 18 ND ............
328S-2 14 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
328S-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ~' ND ND
328N-2 14 3,600 8,4002 6,8003 ND ND ND ND
328N-23'* 35 2,000 1,7004 1,0003 ND ND ND ND
W/O-2 10 40 ............
W/0-6 14 15 ............
NSW-14 14 140 2105 823 ND ND ND ND
· *Sample ID is indicated as 328N-35 on Sequoia Analytical laboratory reports (Appendix E).
I TABLE 2 (continued)
I NOTES: All values in milligrams per kilogram
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
I TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH-D = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
BTEX '~ = Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes
I 1 = Non-Diesel, Mix C13-C20
2 = Non-Diesel, Mix <C17
3 = Non-Gas, Mix >C8
I 4 = Non-Diesel, Mix C10-C16
5 = Weathered Diesel
Detection limits are indicated in laboratory reports, Appendix E.
All samples analyzed by Sequoia Analytical, Redwood City, California.
I
I
'1
TABLE 3
LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED APRIL 1, 1994
FROM STOCKPILED SOIL
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California
GeoResearch Project 9460602100
SAMPLE ID TRPH
mg/kg
SP1 -A 49
SP1 -B 76
SP2-A 180
SP2-B ND
SP3-A 77
SP3-B 240
~ SP4-A 77
SP4-B 20
~" SP5-A 89
SP5-B 180
. SP6-A 96
SP6-B 210
SP8 360
DETECTION LIMITS 10
NOTES: TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
· mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
All samples analyzed by Sequoia Analytical, Redwood City, California.
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
I TANK REMOVAL PERMIT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
. u'No NK p " HAY 2 199~
'~ ~ . ,,~, .[~:~?, . . ,.
';-,..¥ :.': .': .~..:.-?..' '
'AppucA~ou FOR .R'EM'OV~ OF AN U~D~ROUND. STO~a~ TANK
.~,~..~. '.¥: .., -. -:.- , .-:?' :"
FAC~~E ~ .CRO~~ _ _ ~- · J.~. ~
COMP~ ' ' ' PHONE N~~LS~ ~CENSE No.~_~3~ __
I~UUN~CARRIE~ ~ WORSENS COMP No. ~~
TANK~NING INFO~ON
~PA~ .~P- V~ ~, ~~5' T~_ PHONE No.-.(805~. ~-~51
ADDRe~S~~_~eC - "CI~ ~ aPCODE ~
W~mANSPOR~R IDEN~RCATION ~MBER ~
· TANK No. AGE VOLUME u~~ ~H.MICAL DA~S CHEMICAL
~~~ ~ , ~~, _ ,, ,.~._ _.
.... '~~- ~.: -..~.~..~-=:...~~~~
STAT[ L~L ~O FEOER¥ ~G ULATIONS,
APPLICANT NRME (PRIN~ APPLICANT
tHIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMI~ WHEN APPROVED
I
I APPENDIX B
I RINSEATE MANIFEST
· -' ' . '. · Def:x:~lme~t c~ Heolth Se~ice$
~ ~~fle(12~~). ' ' "' - . ,. .. ~to.~l~
~~~~ . 10. ~ ~P~IDN~ ~8 '"' ' '"" '"':"": ':::'"':?: E:~'::'"' : :""::: =================================================================
ifo~iar Sa ~'~ :~:~
~-R~ ~ardo~ Waste Liquid 0,0 ~ 1 T ,T
:EP~: ~ ~ '
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
~ # 0959 - B~ P~ ~S~ & ~S ~E # 15200
524 ~lores StreeE/Ke~ St/Tulare St
~kersfield, ~lifomia 93305 ~q ff~tm[~ ~
16. GENE~TOR$ ~R~F~A~ON: I ~re~ ~e t~ t~ ~ten~ of t~ c~mnt ~o f~ o~ ~cu~e~ ~r~ ~ ~ ~r s~ ~ ~ ~ c~.
~k~. ~. ~ ~. ~ ~e h ~ result h ~r ~bn f~ tr~ ~ h~ ~or~ to ~p~
~~ ~t~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~t~ of tm~ment, ~. ~ d~ cuffent~ ~ 1o ~ ~h ~ ~ ~nl ~ f~e
~t~y~ ~ ~e ~ ~ Y~
~l~y~ ~ S~e ' ~ .~n~ ~ Y~
. _ _. a y ,o , ,q
~l~y~ ~ S~n~e ~ ~ Y~
~9. ~e~ h~¢ ~ S~e
~. ~ ~o* o* 0~o~ C~ of ~oco~ o~ ~o~m m~o~ c~o~ b~ ~h mnlofl o~co~ ~ ~ h dom
/ DO NOT W~E ~ UNE.
I
I
I
I APPENDIX C
I TANK DISPOSAL FORMS
'04-15--1~4 1~:05 005 5@5 Z.054 ~1 P \~ACUUI'I ....... P.'O~ '
Ba~rs~mld, C~lt~nl8 93367 ~ . . ..... ,19
Phone (605) 327.3559 · Fax (805) 3~7-b/4~ ~ntr~otor'e
~rap Ma~ls, Pro~S~ & R~ng Llcen=e No,
O~AOTOR:
JOB SITE:
ADDRESS:
DESTINATION; O. $, M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAOE LANE . BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387
HAULER: '"'1'- c~J~ ~
WEIGHT CERT, NO:
EHSD PERMIT NO: ~ , --
C
' ,,, 5PECTION
~CLEAN & DRY [ACCEPt, OR
1,3~
LEL READINO ~_~
OXYGEN CONTENT ~o ~a.ae
Ali fees incurred are pm Icad ut~loss specified,, l'erm~ are ..
nat 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature
r epresenla aoooptenc, e of terms for pay meat, and oonf~rms
that limk removal complies with Slate laws.
CONTRACTOR*9 SIGNATURE
.---. CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL /DESTRUGTION
T,~I$ IS~TO cJ=~'rlFY THE RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANGE OF THE TANK(8) ~S SPEClFiEO A~VE. ALL MATE~IAL ~PECIFIEO WILliE COMPLETE~.Y
04/0fi,'~4 0(~;~§ "~'805 a~. 0fi76 · ,.-.-!:-...'BFD HAZ /fiAT DIV '" ' ~.005
· .-"......~ 'i...'..:.~ '.~.' ..... . ! - C. '.!'.. "'. )i'...f. · .".
..:, ENVIRONMENTAI::: H. HSERVICES. DEPARTMENT
-"l ~i.£,~....' ........ ....... ......... i.':; ' ' ..... :
i;· STEVE McCALLEY. R.E.H.S. ' · :,. z?00 'M' Stye.t, sate .~oo
DIRECTOR Bakersfield, CA 93301
{a0$) 881-3638
I (80b'-) 861-3425 FAX
I Maz~ch-31, 1994
Jerry Copley, superintendent
B & T Service Station Contractors
P.' O. Box 220
.Arroyo Grande, CA 93421-0220
SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF 550 GALLON FIBERGLASS TANK AT. W.O. # 743
ARVIN SANITARY LANDFILL
Dear Mr. Copley:
Our Department has no objection .to disposal of a waste oil
fiberglass tank recently removed from 524 Dolores Street to the
Arvin Sanitary Landfill, provided the folloQing conditions are met:
1. The tank has been' triple rinsed, certified clean Dy the city
of Bakersfield-Hazardous Materials Division.
2. There is no residual water or petroleum adhering to the tank
remains.
3. The tank has been crushed to pieces no larger than two fee
square.
4. The wasf.e conforms to information submitted to our Department.
Kern County Waste Management Department, as landfill operator,
The
reserves the right to adopt more stringent waste acceptance
criteria. Please contact Bob Neath at (805) 861-2159, to
coordinate disposal.
A waste acceptance fee of $80.00 will be invoiced at a later date.
If there are any questions, please contact me at .(8.05) 861-3636.
SincerelY,
~Steve MCCallast. Director
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Solid Waste Program
WO:WS:jg
~ 3801-~S~ ~ANDE ." ~ COUNTY OF KERN
~ " ~ · . WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPT.
B~ER.~F~ELD-. ~ ': C~ 9~.~,O,~ .... 2700 "M" St., Suite 350
~' Bakersfield, CA 93301.
~ ..... ~'~ ~ (805) 861-2750
G. A,' SCHALLOCK BACKHOE S~ LNDFtL_ ':" ;.
~ .... ?.~ O B 'T
,'~=~_ '300'. '00 ~ ! B F I B~RGLASS i NSULAT I OR! 2 ~ii~ ~ ~?~]i:
. ~'-" "..'- 4~'''35'~ .4. 35 4. ~5
i ~ .... D~V~'S SIGNA~RE CUSTOMER SCALE OPERATOR SlGNA~RE
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX D
! I GEORESEARCH SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES
,I
'I
I
I
!
I
!
!
!
I
!
GEORESEARCH PROCEDURES FOR
SOIL SAMPLING DURING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL
The following practices are followed by GeoResearch personnel during soil sampling
following the removal of underground storage tanks (USTs).
1. A backhoe, hand auger or other excavating device is used to excavate soil
beneath the to the specified depth for sampling.
USTs
2. Samples collected using a backhoe are collected from the center of the bucket to
with the residual soil the buCket teeth
avoid
cross
contamination
on
or
edges.
3. Samples are collected by inserting a 'clean brass or stainless steel ring or a clean
glass jar into the soil in the bucket. If a ring is used, the ends of the ring are
capped with teflon discs and plastic caps and sealed with duct tape. If jars are
used, each jar is capped with a tight-fitting lid lined with teflon.
4. The sample container is completely filled, as possible, to avoid leaving headspace.
5. If a trowel or similar tool is used to collect samples, this tool is washed using a
· non-phosphate detergent and rinsed in distilled water prior to collecting each
sample.
6. Sample splits, duplicates, and background samples, are collected as required by
the oversight agency.
7. Each sample is labeled with the time and date of collectiOn, sample number,
sample location, type of analysis and sampler's initials. Each sample number is
discreet and includes the depth below ground surface or below the tank pit bottom
that the sample was collected. The sample is placed in a cooler maintained at
approximately 4 degrees Centigrade while awaiting transport to a California-
certified hazardous waste laboratory.
8. The sample information is recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document that
accompany the sample to the laboratory.
9. Samples are transported to the specified laboratory a
within
time
frame
sufficient
to permit the required analyses to be completed within the holding time prescribed
for the analyses to be performed.
10. The laboratory analyses to be performed for each sample are consistent with the
contents or suspected contents of the UST beneath which the sample was
collected. All laboratory analyses will be conducted in accordance with the
appropriate California Department of Health Services or Environmental Protection
Agency methods.
,!
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX E
I LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION
I
I
I
I
', ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sequoia '680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 9406, (415) ,64-9600 FAX(4,,) ,64-91,,
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94510 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical819 Striker Avenue, $uite 8 Sacramento, CA 958,4 (916) 921-9600 ' FAX(916) 911-0100
!iii3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Descript: Soil Received: Apr 4, 1994~ii
~ ~San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 AnalysisMethod: EPA 418 1 (I.R. with clean-up) Extracted: Apr 4, 19941iii
· iiiiiAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4D07101 _ Analyzed: Apr 5, 1994ili
· ?~!!i · ' Reported: Apr 11,
I TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
I Sample Sample · Petroleum Oil
I Number Description r~pgp/kj
I 4D07101 220S-2 N.D.
I ' 4D07102 220s-6 N.D.
i 4D07103 221s-2 N.D.
I 4D07107 223s-2 N.D..
I 4D07108 223s-6 N.D.
I 4D07109 224s-2 N.D.
i 4D07110 224S-6 N.D.
II Detection Limits: 15
IAnalytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
· ~)ft'd r~ -.F_ulcher 4D07,01 .GGG < 1 >
Pro,ct Manager
[ Sequoia
680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytica819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-OI00
I
34:37 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Oeseript: Soil ReceiYed: Apr 4, 10O41i!iil
m !~San Luis Obispo, GA 03401 Analysis Method: EPA 41/3.1 (I.E. with clean-up) Extracted: Apr 4, 109411!!I
I !iiiAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4007111 Analyzed: Apr 5, 1994iii
ii~i~ii . ' Reported: 'Apr 11, 19941iiiii
I TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
· Sample Sample Petroleum Oil
· Number Description rog/kg
~ (ppm)
I 4007111 328S-2 N.D.
I 4007112 3285-6 N.D.
I 4007114 220N-2 N.D.
i 4D07115 220N-6 N.D.
4D07116 221N-2 N.D.
I 4D07118 222N-2 19
I 4D07119 222N-6 N.D.
I 4D07120 WO-2 40
I
I[ Detection Limits: 15
IAnalytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
I.Nffdr~-Fulcher
Pro, ct Manager 4D07101.GGG <2>
/~ Sequoia ~,oC~e.~.e~te=~,.e .e~.oo~C,~.,C^..o~, ~.,,,,~.-.~oo
~ Analytical '~',~,~1'~%~'.~'~;~ ~5~::;aa~oS~",=,~,, ~,',l~~, ~:~
~{~3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Descript: Soil Received: Apr 4,
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Meth~: EPA 418.1 (I.R. with clean-up) E~racted: Apr 4, 1994~
~A~ention: Carolyn Walch First Sample · 4D07113 Analyzed: Apr 5, 1994~
Repo~: Apr 11, 1994~
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Sample ~ Sample Petroleum Oil
Number Description
4D07113 328N-2 3,600
~[ Detection Limits: ' 150
~al~es reposed as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
! ~m~ulchor
Proio~t Mana~or q~or~o~.~ao
ilii 3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Descript: Soil Received: Apr 4, 1994 iii
t iiiiiSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 418.1 (I.E. with clean-up) . Extracted: Apr 4, 1994iiii
I iliAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4D07121 ' Analyzed: Apr 5, 19941ii
~}i} Reported: Apr 11, 1994ii!i!i
I , TOTAL:RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
· Sample Sample Petroleum Oil
· Number Description mg/kg
-- (ppm)
I 4D07121 we-6 15
I 4D07122 ' 224N-2 N.D.
I 4D07123 224N-6 N.D.
i 4D07124 . 223N-2 "' 19
i 4D07125 223N-6 N.D.
4D07127 NSW-14 140
II Detection Umits: lS I
I Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
I
Analytical - ;',S'te8 Sacrame;to, CA 958,4 (9,6) 9'11:9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
iiii}3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Descript: Soil Received: Apr 4, 1994iii
· i! San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 418.1 (I.R. with clean-up) Extracted: Apr 4, 1994!~i
~ iiiiiAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4D07126 . Analyzed: Apr 5, 19941iiii
--iiiii.. ' Reported: Apr 11, 1994i!iiii
I ' ' TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
· Sample Sample Petroleum Oil
~ Number Description mg/kg
" (ppm)
I 4D07126 328N-35 2,000 '
I
I
I
i Detecti°n Limits: 300 'l
I Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
er
~l'~oj e teee~MUal~ah;Te r 4D07101 .GGG <5>
Sequoia. 680 Che,apeake Drive ~. Redwood City, CA 9406!~ (415) :364-9600 FAX (415) !~64.92:~3
Analytical1900 Bates Avenue, SuiteL Concord, CA 945'10 (510) 686-9600 FAX(510) 686-9689
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 9:11-0100
Client Project ID: Unocal 0959
i::13437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Matrix: Soil Received: Apr 4, 19941~ii
Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 5030/8015 uod./8020 Reported: Apr 11, 19947iii
i!iiAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4D0710i '
TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION
Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample
Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D.
Analyte
rog/kg 4D07101 4D07102 4D07111 4D07112 4D07113 4D07114
220S-2 220S-6 328S-2 3285;-6 328N-2 220N-2
Purgeable
Hydrocarbons 1.0 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 6,800 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Total Xylenes 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern: ....... , Non-Gas - -
Mix >C8
:ontrol Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2,000 1.0
Date Analyzed: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/5/94 4/4/94
Instrument Identification: GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18
Surrogate Recovery, %: 77 84 84 89 99 87
(QC Limits = 70-130%)
Purgeable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard.
IAnalytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
I A-~ree/Fulch, er
,P'roje~ Manager 4D07101.GGG <6>
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
· 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
i 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100
iiiiiGeo Research Client Project ID: Unocal 0959 Sampled: Apr 1, 1994ii?~ii
iii3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Matrix: Soil' Received: ' Apr 4,
iiiSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Ueti3od: EPA 5030/8015 Mod./8020 Reported: Apr 11, 1994~ii?~i
ii'Attention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4D07115
I TOTAL PURGEABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS with BTEX DISTINCTION
· Reporting Sample Sample Sample
I Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. I.D.
rog/kg 4D07115 4D07126 4D07127
220N-6 328N-35 NSW-14
I Purgeable
Hydrocarbons 1.0 N.D. 1,000 82
i Benzene '- 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D.
I Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D.
i Total Xylenes 0.0050 N.D. N.D. N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern: -- Non-Gas Non-Gas
I Mix > C8 Mix > C8
Control Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor: 1.0 100 50
Date Analyzed: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94
Instrument Identification: GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18
Surrogate Recovery, %: 79 100 99
(QC Limits = 70-130%) '
Purgeable' Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh gasoline standard.
I Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
I¢~'dre,~Fulcher
Project Manager 4DO7101.GGG <7>
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 9406, (4,5) .364-9600 FAX (415)364-92,3
Analytical 1900 Bates Avenue, SuiteL Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX(510) 686-9689
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 lAX (916) 921-0100
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Matrix: Soil Received: A~3r 4, 1994
I~iiSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 3550/8015 Reported: Apr 11, 1994iii
ifil!Attention: Carolyn Walch · First Sample #: 4907101 ·
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample
Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D.. I.D. I.D.
mg/kg 4907101 4907102 4907107 4907108 4907111 4907112
2205-2 220S-6 223S-2 223S.6 328S-2 3285-6
Extractable
Hydrocarbons 1.0 1.6 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern: Discrete ..........
Peak
Control Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Date Extracted: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94
Date Analyzed: 4/4/94 · 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/5/94
Instrument Identification: GCHP-5B GCHP-5B GCHP-5B GCHP-5A GCHP-5A GCHP-5A
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quar~fitated against a fresh diesel standard,
Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
I ~dre,af/Fulcher
l~roje~'t Manager 4D07101.GGG <8>
~ Sequoia' 680Che,ape.keOriveRedwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX(415) 364-9233
Analytical ,900.a,e.^ve.ue, Su,te' Co.cord, C^ 94.20 ~.,0, ~-.~00
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 . (916) 921-9600 F~ (916) 921-0100
~ 'e roject ID: Unocal 0959 Sampl~' ........... ~'~'~'"~'~'"~'~
~3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Matrix: Soil Received: Apr 4, 1994~
~San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ' Analysis Method: EPA 3550/8015 RepoSed: Apr 11, 1994~
~ARention: Carolyn Walch First Sample ~: 4D07113
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
EXTRACTABLE
Repoding Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample
Anal~e Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D.
Emractable
H~drocarbons 1.0 8,400 ND. ND. ~.D. 2.7 1,700
Ghromato~ram Pa~orn: ~on-Diosol ......
Mix <C17 Mix C13-C20 Mix C1~C16
MulUpllcation Factor: 1~0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 50
Date E~racted: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94
0.,~ ,..~d: 4/s/~4 4/s/~4 4/4/04 4/4/04 4/4/04 4/s/~4
Instrument Identification: GGHP-5A GGHP-5A GGHP-5B GGHP-5B GGHP-5B GGHP-5B
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh diesel standard.
mAnalytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
mA~dr~ Fulcher
Pro,ct Manager 4D07101.GGG <9>
Analytica1 ,90o l~ate$ Avenue, ~u,te L t_oncora, t-~ ,,~,,u ,,,u, .......... ,.~ .t~, ........
' 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 958]4 (916) 921-9600 F.~tX (916} 911-0100
~i3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A ' Sample Matrix: Soil Received: Apr 4, 1994~?~i~
~iSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Anal;/sis Method: EPA 3550/8015 Reported: Apr 11, 1994ii~
~ii!iAttention: Carolyn Walch First Sample #: 4007127 .............................
I TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Reporting sample
I Analyte Limit I.D.
mg/kg 4007127
NSW-14
I Extractable
Hydrocarbons 1.0 210
I Chromatogram Pattern: We'athered
Diesel
I
I Quality Control Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor: 20
Date Extracted: 4/4/94
Date Analyzed: 4/5/94
Instrument Identification: GCHP-5B
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh diesel standard.
IAnalytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit,
oequo.a 6,0Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 564-9600 FAX {415) 364-92,.~
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 [:AX (510) 686-9689
[ 819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
· iilGeo Research . Client Project ID: U oca 0959
i~i~3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid
li?~iSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401
ili!Attention: Carolyn Walch QC Sample Group: 4D07101,03,05,07,09 11 Reported: Apr 11, 1994
i 13-14,16,18,20,22,24,26
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT
ANALYTE Ttl. Recov; Pet.
Hydrocarbon
I Method: EPA 418,1
Analyst: K. Hynes
MS/MSD
I Batch#: BLANK
Date Prepared: 4/4/94
I Date Analyzed: 4/4/94
Instrument I.D.#: N/A
Conc. Spiked: 260 mg/kg
'l Matrix Spike
% Recovery: 9t
i Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Recovery: 87
· Relative %
Difference: 4.5
LCS Batch#: ,NOT
I Date Prepared':
Date Analyzed:
Instrument I.D.#:
I LCS %
Recovery:
II % Recovery
Control Limits: 60-140
[Please Note:
I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,
Ipreparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
· ~fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
' Ithe recovery of analytes from the matt x spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
~interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch.
" er
Voa'j~ct ~nCan;rer '4D07101.GGG <11,.
' /~ Sequoia 680 Che,apeake Or, ve Redwood City. CA 9~063 (4,5) 364-%00
~ lyt~ iAna'-~-'ca' ,900Bate~^~nue,~u.e'~ ~oncord.~^9~5~0 ~,0)~8~-9600 F~X(5,0) 6~.9~8~
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100
iiii!i:~:~':'~:~'~'"'~'~:~:':':':':':':: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Client Proiect ID.' Unocal 09S9 i
iliii3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid
I ?~iSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401
ii!!iAttention: Carolyn Walch QC Sample Group: 4D07102,04,06,08,10 Reported: Apr 11, 1994iiilii
12,1§,!7,19,21,23,25,27
OUALI'D[ CONIROI DATA RI::~OFII
ANAL¥1E Itl. Rocor. Pet.
Hydrocarbon
Method: EP^
Analyst: K. Hynes
MS/MSD
Batch#: BLANK
Date Prepared: 4/5/94
Date Analyzed: 4/5/94
Instrument I.D.#: N/A
Conc. Spiked: 260 mg/kg .
Matrix Spike
% Recovery: 88
Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Recovery: 89
Relative %
Difference: 1.1
LCS Batch#: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Instrument I.D.#:
LCS %
Recovery:
II % Recovery
Control Limits: 60-140
IPlease Note:
I The LGS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,
Ipreparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
Ifortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
Ithe recovery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
linterference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch.
ICProje~t Manager 4D07101.GGG < 12>
- ,_.. ,Sequ°ia680 Chesapeake Drive . Redwood City, CA 94063CA (4,5) ,64-9600 FAX (415) ,64-92:~,
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
^nmyucai819 Striker Ave,ue, Suite8 Sacramento, 958,4 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
i!ii?~:~:~:+~'~'~:~'~:~ ............................................. ? .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Client Proiect iD: Unocal 0050
~}i~3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 '.
iiiAttention: Carolyn Walch QC Sample Group: 4D07101-02 11-15 26-27 Reported: Apr 11, 1994iiii!i
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT
ANALYTE Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes
Benzene
Method: EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020 EPA 8020
Analyst: A. Maralit A, Maralit A. Maralit A. Maralit
MS/MSD
Batch#: 4C95701 4C95701 4C95701 4C95701
Date Prepared: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94
Date Analyzed: 4/4/94 4/4/94 4/4/94. 4/4/94
Instrument I.D.#: GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18 GCHP-18
Conc. Spiked: o.2o mg/kg 0.20 mg/kg 0.20 mg/kg 0.60 rog/kg
, Matrix Spike
% Recovery: lOC lOC lOC lo2
Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Fle¢overy: leo leo los lO3
Relative %
Difference: o.o o.o 4.0 1.o
LCS Batch#: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Instrument I,D.#:
LCS %
Recovery:
Control Limits: 55-145 47-149 47-155 56-140
IPlease Note:
s I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,
Ipreparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
* [fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
Ithe recovery of analytes from'the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
~_r~~ "~ linterference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch.
I..?'roJ~TEt Manager * 4DO7101.GGG <13>
[ - ... ,Sequ°ia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood. City, CA 94063 (415) 92,-9600364'9600 FAX(916) gI,-0100FAX(4'5)'~64'923'
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 , , (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
^naiyucm819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916)
!
iiiiGeo Research Client Project ID: Unocal 0959
iiii13437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid
I ~:i:iSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401
iii!Attention: Carolyn Walch QC Samp e Group: 4D07101-02,07-08, Reported: Apr 11, 1994iiii
11-15,24-27
I QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT
I ANALYTE Diesel
I Method: EPA 8015 Mod.
Analyst: A. Nagra
' MS/MSD
,!
! Batch#: 4D07108
Date Prepared: 4/4/94
I Date Analyzed: 4/4/94
Instrument I.D.#: GCHP-5A
Conc. Spiked: 15 mg/kg:
I Matrix Spike
% Recovery: - 73
i Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Recovery: 80
I Relative %
Difference: 9,2 ,
LCS Batch#: NOT APPLICABLE
I Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Instrument I.D.#:
I LCS %
Recovery: -' "
II % Recovery
I Control Limits: 38-122 '1
.!
I Please Note: .
I The LCS is a control sample of known, intederent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,
. SE~U~A~~ ,preparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
!
Ifortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
Ithe recovery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
~interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch,
I ~.re~..ulcher
Proje,~t Manager 4D07101.GGG <14>
GEOTEST GEOTEST
3960 Gilman Street
Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJECT NO:
~ CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD y
'- ~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 DATE f"~-!
PROJECT NAME ~//~ ~rJ ~ '~ ~ METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING
ADDRESS ~"Z-~/ ' O0~/O ~'.~' ~ ..~-
SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE/~--~'~-~' "-- uJ
PRINTED NAME ~-~/~ ~ ~/'~1 ~/{ ~-~' / ~ ~ ~
CLIENT PROJECT NO. < ~ ~
PROJECT MANAGER rOl~ ~ )~ I C ~ ~ ~ m ~
' O O
~ ~ ~ ~ o'
~PLE NO. D~TE ~E LO~TIO~
-
DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS
~INQUlSHED "~ ~TE a RELINQUISHED "V DATE ~ RELINQUISHED "~
~T~E r // SI~NAT~R~ SIgNaTUrE ~IN OF O~STO~? SE~L ?ES/NO
/~ TIME PRINTED NAME TIME PRINTED NAME. TIME
/P~TED~ME PROJECT COMMENTS
COMPANY /~0 COMPANY COMPANY
I'
~ RECEIVED "Y DATE J RECEIVED aY DATE ~ ~D ~ DATE
~ / SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ' )~0~
SIGNATU~ ~ ~
P~IN~NAME TIME PRINTED NAME TIME PRI~ED NAME TIME
/
COMPLY ~MP~Y COMPANY
GEOTEST ~ ~ ~ 7 ~/9/'_,~5~ ~ z~ ~'~,"~- /[ GEOTEST ..
' 3960 Gilman Street ~.,,)~,,~9~. ~O~
~ Telephone: (310)498-9515 (800)62~57~ C CUSTODY RECORD DATE ~/
PR~ECTNAM~0 ¢ ~ 0~ '~ - METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING
PRI~EDNAME ~ ~ [[ ~' i ~ ~
~ Z
CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ ~ O~.~ ~ ~ ~ x [ -
PROJECT MANAGER ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ O O
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME ~ LOCA~ON
E ~ ,~UNaU~S.E..~ DATE ~ "~ s,u,~ co,~mo,s
~IGNAT~ -- . ~// SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY S~L YES~O
PR~N~DNA~ TI~E PR~NTEDNAME PROJECT COMMENTS
U .ECEiVED SY DATE U .ECEiVEO BY DATE U ~~By~ DATE
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
PR~NTE TIME P~NTED~UE TIME PR~NTEDNAUE TIME
COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY
GEOTEST Y'5.7
~ Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJE~;_~O: ..,
~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODYRECORD DATE
PROJE~ NAME ~ - _ : M~ODS SPECIAL HANDLING
PRINTED NAME ~ ~ ~ ..... '"'~..' ~ ~
z z
CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x -- O
'PROJECT MANAGER '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x
SAMPLE NO. DATE ~ME LOCA~ON
~ ' DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS
~EUNQUlSHED aY ~TE ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE la
~N~RE ..[ ~ SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY S~L YES~O
P~D ~,~E ' TIME PRI~ED NAME TIME PRt~ED NAME PROJECT 'COMMENTS
M .ECEIVED BY DATE M .ECEIVED BY DATE
Pnl~ ~D~ ~ ~ME PRIN~D NAME ~ME PRINTED NAME TIME
~PANY COMP~ ~MP~Y
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive. Redwood City, CA 94065 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415} 364-9233
Analytical 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921.0100
~i~3437 Empresa Drive, Su te A Matrix Descript: Soil Received: Apr 4,
!!i!iSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 418.1 (I.R. with clean-up) Extracted: Apr 6, 1994ii!!i'
i~iiAttention: Carolyn Welch First Sample #: 4D0680i Analyzed: Apr 6, 19941!!
. . Reported: Apr 7, 1994ii?iii
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Sample ' Sample Petroleum Oil
Number Description ~pgp/mk~
4D06801 sP 1-A 49
4D06802 SP 1-B 76
4D06803 SP 2-A 180
4D06806 · SP 3-~ 240'
4D06807 SP 4-A 77
4D06808 sp 4-B 20
~ 4D06809 SP 5-A 89
4D068i 0 SP 5-B 180
Detection Limits: 15
IAnalytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
iA~dre~fl=blcher
Projedt Manager 4DO6801.GGG < 1 >
~' ~ Sequoia
680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
Analytical 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 lAX (510) 686-9689
· 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100
- i~ii~34a7 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix Descdpt: Soil , Receiv~l: Apr 4,
_ ~iiiSan Luis Obispo, GA 9:3401 Analysis Method: EPA 418.1 (I.R. with clean-~up} Extractod: Apr 6,
~ i~iiAttention: Garolyn Waloh ~ Hrst Sample #: 4D0§Bt 1 Analyzod: Apr §,
I ~!ii! ' ~ Fleported: Apr ?,
Revised: Apr '11, 1994
I TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Sample Sample Petroleum Oil
I Number Description mg/kg
· (ppm)
I 4D06811 sP 6-A 96
I 4D06812 sP 6-B 210
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
~ Detection Limits: . 15
I Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA 94063' (415i 364-9600 FAX (415} 364-9233
Analytical 1900 Bates Avenue, SuiteL Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX(510) 686-9689
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100
iii~i3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid '
I iiilSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401
iiiiiAttention: Carolyn Walch QC Sample Group: 4D06801-12 Reported: Apr 7, 1994ii~iii
Batch#: 4D06810
Date Prepared: 4/6/94'
Date Analyzed: 4/6/94 '
Instrument I.D.#: N/A
Conc. Spiked: 260 mg/kg '
Matrix Spike'
% Recovery: 94
Matrix Spike
' Duplicate %
Recovery: 81
'Relative %
Difference: 15
LCS Batch#: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
i Instrument I.D.#:
LCS %
Recovery:
II ' %Rec°very
[ Control Limits:' 60-140
]Please Note: .
I The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,
~preparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
Ifortified with known quantities Of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
Ithe recovery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
~interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch.
I Project Manager 4D06801.GGG <3>
EOTEST
3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST
~ Long Beach, CA. 90815 PROJE(;]' NO:
'-,,==,-- Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE /'if-/'"'"~ l../ PAGE / OF"7-----T-.
: ¢¢~'-' ~7 ~ ~ C. ~,-.
PROJECT NAME~ -- METHODS . SPECIAL HANDLING
ADDRESS ~"-Z"H ~C~C:k~-r'' ~c'., ~ u Jo.. ~co
SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE -~"-"1/'-''~ -- Z"' . . ~ --Z
PRINTED NAME ~'~C~;~', t[ 9- Vv[ ~ ti (~ O~ ~,,, rruj
CO Z Z
CLIENT PROJECT NO. ,~ uu ~: x -- O
PROJECT MANAGER ('_ ~v-c')~L,~ v-~ t,~O=-~ C %~ O ~ x ~. ~ ~E z~ ,,
-r 2E '" ~ < 0 0
SAMPLE "O. DATE ] TIME I LOCATION
Mi"
ELINQUISHED BY ~,' , SAMPLE CONDITIONS
Y~-----4/~"~Iy' RECE,VED ON 'CE YES~"O
d-.~..I~N~iE/~//f /~¢/~ SIGNATURE . . SIGNATURE CHAIN OF OUSTOBY SEAL YES~O
n - TI~E PRINTED N*~E TI~E PRINTED NAME TIBE
P~TEB ~E PROJECT COMMENTS
;~ ~¢ ~ /~ COMPANY COMPANY
OOMP ANY ~~
~EECEIVED~Y DATE ~VED~~. DATE ~EECEIVEDBY[LAB} DATE ~ ~~
SIGNATURE ~ ' SIGNATURE ' ~~' ~~,
COMPANY COMPANY ~ ~,'OC COMPANY ~ ~
GEOTEST
PROJECT NO:. _
~ L~g Beach, C~90815
~ ~~(310) 498-9515 (800) 62~S7~ '~ .CHAIN-OF-CUSTODYRECORD DATE
/ SPECIAL HANDLING
SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ~ ~ ~ , ~ --
CLIENT PROJECT NO. ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z z
PROJECT MANAGER ~ H ~ ~[ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ O O
LOCATION
LINOUISHED .Y DATE ffi RELINOUISHED BY DATE la ""['"QU'S""" "' DATE SAUPLE COND,TiONS
~ ~ RECEIVED ON ICE YES~O
~NA~RE ,~ SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL YES~O
~ ~~ /~ COMPANY COMPANY ·
~ .ECE,VED ~ DATE ~ RECE,VED ~ DATE
PRI~E -/ TIME PRINTED NAME TIME PRIN~NAME
Senuoia 6,0c. k o
Lg~.~ ~-' esapea e rive ' edwood City, CA 94063 (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
~"~.~ ~ I --. I 1900 Bates Avenue Suite L Concord CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX 686-9689
, , FAX (916) 921-0100
Analyucal. 819 Striker Avenu;' Suite8 Sacrame;to-CA 958,4 (916) 921-9600 (510)
~{~{3437 Empre~ Drive, SuiteA Matrix Descript: Soil Receive: Apr 4, 1~4~
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Analysis Method: EPA 418.1 (I.R. with clean-up) · E~racted: Apr 6, 1994~[
~?~{A~ention: Carolyn Walch First Sample ~ 4D06601 Analyzed: Apr 6, 1~4~
..................................................................................................................................... :. ~ ' RepoSed: Apr 8, 1~4~??~
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Apr 1~4
Sample Sample Petroleum Oil
Number Description mg/kg
(ppm)
4D06601 sP8, 360
Anal~es reposed as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
~ndr~ Fulcher .
Project Manager ' 4D06~I.GGG < 1 >
I oe,-luo-a 8OC,e,a eakeOr, e ,edwoodC,t,,CA 940 3
Aalytical , 900 Bates Avenue, SuiteL Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX(SI0) 6,6-9689
n 819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 lAX (916) 921-0100
I
::iii L~eo esea J : ::::i
~ ~ilii3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Matrix: Solid ' !iiiii '
· i~iiSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401
li!!i!Attention: Carolyn Walch QC Sample Group: 4D06601 Reported: Apr 8, 1994!~!!!
MS/MSD
I Batch#: 4D06810
Date Prepared: 4/6/94
· Date Analyzed: 4/6/94 ·
· Instrument I.D.#: N/A
Cone. Spiked: 260 mg/kg
I ' Matrix Spike '
I % Recovery: 94
· Matrix Spike
· Duplicate %
-- Recovery: 81
Relative %
· Difference: 15
LCS Batch#: NOT APPLICABLE
I Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Instrument I.D.#:
Recovery:
I % Recovery
I Control Limits: 60.140
!
IPIoase Note:
I lbo LC$ is a control sample of known, intedorent free matrix that is anal~ed using the Same reagents.
~ SEQUGIA'~NALYTICAL Ipreparation, and analytical methods employed for the samples. The matrix spike is an aliquot of sample
~~ [fortified with known quantities of specific compounds and subjected to the entire analytical procedure. If
[the recovery of analytes from the matrix spike does not fall within specified control limits due to matrix
[interference, the LCS recovery is to be used to validate the batch.
I Pro~ectaanager 4D0660t.GGG <2>
GEOTEST
3960 Gilman Street GEOTEST
Long Beach, CA. 90815 CHAIN-OF-cuSTODY RECORD PROJECT. NO: .
~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (soo) 624-5744 DATE
PROJECT NAM. E ~ ~ ~ ~''¢~ / METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING
..........
ADDRESS ,,, ~ m z
SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ~ r ~ ; z --
PRINTED NAME Du.
~ z z
CLIENT PROJECT NO. < '" m x -- O
PROJECT MANAGER_, ~ ~,..-Q.,,3 { L,/~ [.,-,,.~.,~ I~..._ . On3:: ' n3::~ ~x ~5"- ~OLU ~: oZ oU'
SAMPLE NO, DATE TIME LOCATION
ELINQUISHED BY z~/m ~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE I~ RELINQUISHED BY DATE SAMPLE CONDITIONS
RECEIVED ON ICE YES/NO
~4~N,~t, JRE ' . .3, / ~'7~,. ~/, SIGNATURE SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL YES/NO
/~*~ ~/' ~/~'/'/~f-- TIME PRINTED NAME TIME
PRINT. r~b ~AMF--, ' ' TIME PRINTED N^~E PROJECT COMMENTS
COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY
~ RECEIVED aY DATE ~ RECEIVED BY DATE ~i RECEIVED BY (LAS) DA..'I'E '~y. ~'~Sv l-lc ~ '}'o;
SIG/I~UR~ ~
P~Iq~T. EO~AME "' TIME PRINTED NAME TIME PRINTED NAME TIME
I APPENDIX F
I SOIL COMPACTION REPORTS
GEOTECHNICAL ENGIMEERING-DRILLING SERVICES ..:
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & M~TERIAL6 T~TIN6
April 27, 1994 TL 994-032-01
For: B&T. So, ice Station Con~racto~s
.. 'Post Office ~x 220
~oyo Grande, Callfornia 93421-0220
'Attn~ ~.. To~y ~llodge
Project: ~OC~ 90595 -
524 DELO~S,
~~FI~LD, ~I~O~IA
Subject = Goi~ ~'i~
.~ar ~. ~lledge=
This re~rt presents the results of in-place density tests
conducted on th~ backfill soils and aggregd~ ba~e mate~&als placed
in several ta~ removal excavations at the a~ve referenced pr0j~c~
Our se~i~o~ were v~rbally ~u~hort~ed' ~nd directed 'by ~. 'z'o~y
~lledge, a represen~atlve of B&T Se~ice Station Contractors.
P.~sE. ~ sc~E OF
The purpose of our serviu~ was Co dete~ine Che relative
compaction of the backfill soils and ag~egate base material placed
in =he excavations Cz'om the r~oval of several tan~6 at various
locations and depths.
The tasks undertaken to. achieve the purpose consisted of~
l ) obtaining verbal proJ mcr s~ci fic ation~ f~m
Tulledge, B&T'S representative in charge of the project;
2) °b=alnlng various representative s~ples of the backfill
soils and aggregate base materials, returning the s~Dles
Co the laborato~ and the
dete~ining
~X~
density
and opt~ moisture content for each;
3) dete~ining the in-place dens.icy, mci{Cure content and
relative compaction of ~he backfill soils and aggregate
base material~ placed at the various locations and
desch8; and
~TE CFFIC~ MODES?O VlSALik BAKE~FtEL~
Fresno ~e~t ~ K~rna~ Ave. Suite 1C~ ~2~ E. V~I~y ~ ~i~8 3~01 P~$us Ori~. Suite 124
~7021 · F~ ~7~26 ,, (~) ~1~ (~)~1712
Chemis;~ F~ ~7~ ;a~ ~ 147 ;~ 62~171¢
~PR £8 '94 lB: ]4 TI..IIMIMG LABS, BFKLD P.
I
I B&T Service Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
ADril 27, 1994 Page
I
I 4) p~a~ing this'report.
i Twining was not requested to verifymater£al compliance.
I This .portion of the project consisted of backfill and compaction
procedures ~or a fuel'., tank rgmoval and a waste o~1 pit romoval
excavations located :at 524 Delores' Street in Bakersfield,
'I California.
I O CT-SmEC FICAT 0NS
In. accordance with the project specifications presented to The
I Twining. Labora~or~ee, Inc. by Mr. Tull~dg~; ~he b~ck£ill material~
shall be. moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted to a
minimum of 90 Percent of the maximum dry density a~ dotormin=d by
i ASTM Test Method D1557-78. In addition, the upper two feet of
backfill m~terial shall be ~ompa¢~d to. a minimum of 95 percent
relative compaction. '
I
I ~he tests were conducted b¥~£ning's engineering techn£cians~
and 1994.
I ~n£t£a11¥~ the ~o£1s were sampled and visually classtf£ed tn
accordance wl~h ~he unified ~oil classification System. The soils
I were tested in the laboratory per American Society of Testing
Materials (AST~) D15§7, Methods A and C, ~o desermine ~he maximum.
dry density and optimum moisture content for each representative
i sample.
The depth o~ the testing was determined by personnel of B&T Service
Station Contractors, whale the frequency of the testing wa~
I d
etermined Dy the engineering technician based on the depth and
square footage of fill area.
i The in-place density tests and moisture detezmina=ions were
conducted with a Nuclear Moisture Density Gauge.
I
~F'R ~8 '94 13:]5 TWIMIMG L~BS, BFKLD
B&T Servi=e Station Con~ra~or~ ~ 994-032-01
April ~7, ~994
Th~ lo~attons a~ dopgh~ were detemined by pacing and use of
su~ey grade stakes, an~ shoul~ be oon~idor~d uo=urate =o w~thtn
5.0 fee~ and 0.5 feet, res~ct~vely.
~e~t~ of ~xim~ ~ity~.Qgt~_~oi~ture De~e~nations
-(~ Test Method D1557, M~thod A)
~terial ~x~ D~ ~n~ity,
S~pl~ ~_Lo~gtion No. . ....... lb~ ~cu. f~. Moisture,
Composite of 1 128.3 9.
Native ~terial
S~ple
C~i~ of 2 ' 108.3 8.2
Im~rt ~terial
S~Pled
Results of ~x~...Dgnsity/0Pt~ Moisture Dete~inations
(~ Te~t ~tho~ D1557~ ~=hod C) "
S~Dle L~ation No. ~_bS/cu. ft. Moisture %
Composite 0f 3 139.0 6.2
~gr~ga=e Baserock
s~pled On-site'
Results In-PLace Tests
Densit~
(~TM' Test ~thod D2922/Nucle~ Gauge with 12-inch Pro~}
Depth
Below In-
~s~d Place Rmla
~te- Final D~ Mois- -tlve ~ired
Test Test rial Grade, Density, ~ure, C~. ComD.
NO~ . ~ Test Location. No. 'Feet Lbs/cu. ft. % % %
,1. 04/11 Ta~ Excavation. 1 12-13 117.5 6.6 91.6 90
southeast ~arter
2. 04/11'Ta~ Excavation 1 12-13 120.5 8.7 93.9 90
southwest ~arter
~F'R 2'8 '94 lB: 15 THII~IPtG LF~BS~ BFKLD P .... 14
I
BaT Service Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
April 27, 1994 Page 4
: Depth
Below In-
Assumed Place Rela Ro-
Mate- Final Mois- -tire
Dry
quired
Test Tes~ rial Grade, Dono£~y, .turo, .Comp. Comp.
No. Date Test Location ...No, Feet .... ~ % % %
3. 04/11 Tank Excavation 1 12-13 117.7 11.4 91.7 90
northwest quarter
4. 04'/11 Tank Excavation 1 12-13 121.2 9.2 94.5 90
northeast quarter
5. 04/11 Tank Excavation i 12-13 118.4 11.3 92,3 90
6. 04/11 T~nk.~zc~va~ion 1 10-11 119.1 9.1 92.8 90
'southwest quarter
7. 04/11 Tank Excavation 1 10-11 124.7 9.1 97.2 90
.norbhw~b quurt~r
8. 04/i1 Ta,k .Excavation I 10-11 123.4 8.3 96.2 90
northeast quarter
· 9. 04/11 Tank Excavation' 1 10-11 125.8 8.3 98.1 90
10. 04/11 Tank Excavation 1 10-11 121,8 B,0 94.9 90
southeast qUarter
11. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 122,8' 8.9 95,7 90
southwest quarter
~2. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 123.6 10.0 96.3 90
northwest quarter
13. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 122.2 10,3 95.2 90
northeast quarter
14. 0~/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 1~3.6 9.3 96,3 90
center
APR E8 '94 13:15 TWII'~iMG LABS, BF](LD
B&T SerVice Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
April 2?, 1994 Pag~ 5
Depth '
Below In-
Assumed Place Rela Re-
Mate- Final Dry Mole-. -tire quired
Test Test. rial Grade, Density, ture, Comp. Comp.
No__=_. Date' Test Location No. Feet ~.hs~¢u.ft. % % %
15. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9. 121.6 9.9 94.8 90
southeast quarter
16. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 4-5 106.1 4.8 98.0 90
center
17. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1~ 7-8 122.7 8.~ 95.6 90
southwest quarter
18. 04/12 Tank E~cavation .1 7-8 121.2 11.8 94.5 90
northwest quarter
19. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 7-8 125.7 8.0 98.0 +0
'center
20. 04/1'2 Tank~EXCavation 1 7-8 122.2 11.2 95.2 90
southeast quarter
21. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 7-8 123.0 10.8 95.9 90
northeast quarter
22. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 3-4 101.2 8.2 93.4 90.
northwest quarter
2~. ,04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 102.1 8.5 94.3 90
northwest quarter
24. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 107.5 4.5 99.3 90
southwest quarter
25. 04/12 Waste Oil'Pit 2 6-7 106.5 4.6 98.3 90
southeast quarter
26. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 105.9 4.4 97.8 90
northeast quarter
27. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 107.5 9.1 99.3 90
center
APR P_8 '94 13:16 TWIMII'~G LABS, BFKLD P.?-'~14
~B&T ,q~-~ice Station Contractoru TL 994-032-01
April 27, 1994 Page 6
Depth
· Below In-
Assumed Place Rela- Re-
I Mate- Final· Mois- -tire
Dry
T~t TeBt rial Grade, ~en~ty, tu~, Com~. Comp.
No. Date Test ~ocation No. Feet Lbs/cu.ft. % % %
I 28. 04/13 Waste 0il Pit 2 2-3 103.9 5.2 95.9 90
I 2~. ' 04/1~ Tank ExcavatiOn ~ ~-5 108.2 6.1 100.0 ,, 90'
northwes~ quarter
I 30. 04/13 Tank Ezcava~ion 2 4-5 108.1 7.7 100.0 90
·outhwes= quarter
· ~1. 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 4-5 107.6 6,;8 99.0 90
~ , cente=:
· 32. 04/13 TanR EXcavation 2 4-5 104.7 5.9 97.0~ 90
I ~ou~heas~ quarto~
33. 04/13 Tank Eaoavation 2 4-5 101.~ 12.7 93.5 90
I southeast qu~r~er,
34. 04/13 Ta,k Excavation 2 1-2 105.2 5.6 97.1 95
35.. 04/13 T~nk Excavation 2 1-2 106.6 10.7 98.4 95
northwest quarter
I 36. 0~/13 Tank ~xuavation 2 1-2 103.6 13.1 95.7 95
c~nt~r
I '37. 04/13 Tardc Excavdt£on 2 1-2' 105.6 . 13.1 -97,5 95
south~as~ quarter
I 38. 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 1-2 106.3 12.7 98.2 95
northeast ~uar=er
I 35. 04/13 Wa~ue Oil Pi= 2 1-2 105.1 7.8 97.0 95
center
~8 "9~ 13:16 ~:.411'{iP~ ~'~S, ~-~':LD
Service Station Coatr~Ctor~· TL 9~4-032-01
April 27, 1994 ~ge ?
Depth
A~umed Pla~ Kela Re-
To~t Teot ~tal G~ada, f~nsit¥, ~ure,' C~D. comp.
40. 04/14 ~as T~n~ 2 0-12 106.9 ~.4 98.7
8~cava~on
Bou~h~s~
41. 04/14 ~as Ta~ 2 0-12 105.1 7.2 9~.0
Excavatio~
42. 04/14 Ga~ Tmnk 2 0-12 106.3 7.4 98.2
~XC~v~tlon
center'
43, 04/14. Gas Ta~ ''2 0-12 107.4 7.5 99.2 9~
Exuav~tioa
northeast ~artur ,
44. 04/14 ~ Tank ~ '0-IR ~05.} 5.4 97.0 95
45. 04/15 Tank Excavation 3 0-4 110.7 5.1 94.0* 95
45A. 04/19 Retest o~ Te~t 3 0-4 134.0 ~,5 96.4 95
NO, 45
46. 04/15 T=nk Excavation 3 0-4 129.~ 4,3 93.4*
46A, 04/19 RO~5 u& Te~ ~ 0-4 132.0 3.8 95.0
4?. 04~l~.Ta~ gxcavatlon 3 0-4 129.4 5.~ 93.1'
47A. 04/19 ~test o~ ~a,t 3 0-& .139.] &.]. 95.0 95
APR ~8 '94 13:19 TI,~II~II'~tG LABS, BF~<LD
I B&T ~$~rvice Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
Agril 27, 1994 Page
! .
Depth
B~10w In-
ASsumed D] a~ Rela Re-
Mate- Final Dry Mois- -tire quired
Test Test rial Grade, Density, tuts, Co~p. Comp.
~o. Date TeSt Location No. Fe___et Lbs/cu:ft. % % %
48. 04/15 Tank Excavation 3 0-4 129.5 5.7 93.2' 95
southwest quarter
4~A...04/19 Retest of T~st 3 0~4 133.0 3.2 95.7 9~
NO. 48
49.' 04/15 Tank Excavation % 0-4 129.8 5.3 93.4* 95
center
49A. 04/19 Retest of Test 3 0-4 132.5 3.6 95.3 95
NO. 49
50. 04/15 Waste Oil Pit 3 0-4 132.8 4.2 95.5 95
* NOT, K: Due to falling test result~ ~ome areas were reims%ed after
additionalcompaction effort.
co cn szoNS
The relative comPaction of the backfill soils and aggregate base
for the tank removals, met or exceed the minimum requirement as
specified.
U~r 2 feeC .... .... ........ 95 ~ercen= relative compaction
~elow Upper 2 feet ......... . 90 percent relative compaction
Th~ tu~t procedures used c°m~lied w£=h generally accepted me~hods
practiced i~ the £ndus~ry. The data presented tn Chis repot=
Proutdc~/ ~o: Informational purposes only. The .scope of our
service~ did ~ot provide .for co~tinuou~ observations by our
~e£~o~u~el a~ ~he 61=e~ thus, we cannot express an opinion as to the
~F'R £8 '94 13:,-o .... THT. I'III~G LF~BS, BFKLD . F'. 1/1
!
I B&T Se~ice Station'Contractors ~ 994-032-01
April 2?, 1994 ' Page 9
I ade~acy of the site preparation and fill compaction. We do not
undo~e ~he ~~ee of const~ctio, nor do we relieve the
contractor of hi~ pr~a~ res~nsibili~ ~o '.produce a completed
project accordance with t~plans and s~.~£cation We
.. ~o res~nsibili=y or liability for d~ages originating ~from the
~proper ucc of these results presented in accordanoe
generally accepted testing principles and practices exercised in
I =he City of Bakersfiold, Kern Count, California, as of April 1994.
This warran~ is in lieu of all other warranties either e~ressed
I W~ appr~=iate the oppo=~unity to be of' semite to you on th~s
project.-Should you have any~estions concerning the info~ation
I B£o.vl~d, please contact our o~fico.
Sincerely' '
3c~ herew£~h
APR 28 '94 13:17 THIHIHG LABS, BFKLD F'.9,'14
PROOTOR TEST REPORT
~Hodi~iod" Proctors A~TH ~ 1557~ Hethod R
Elev/ .. Cl~$=~t ton N~t. 8p,8, LC PZ
9-12: gM ,, 2.78
TE~T ~SULTS MRT~IRL
H~xlm~m d~ densltv- 12G.~ pc~
Pro,eot ~.; 9~4-B52 Remarks:
Pro*Jec~: U~OCAL S~E~ ~Y; R, C~POS
Location; DELOS8 STREET LOCATION: ON-SITE
BAKE~FIELg, CRLIFORHIA SAMPLE
PROCTOR TEST ~PORT
THE TWINI~ ~SO~TORIES; IHC, FiguPe
APR 28 'g4 13:17 THIHIHG LABS, BFKLD P. 1FJ/14
PROCTOR TEST REPORT
_~ ~ ,~ i -' ',' ~ "~ ......... .,,,,.,
"Hodl~i~d~ Proctor~ ~TH B 1~7. Me~hod ~
~ep ~_h ~8C0 R~HTO Mo i st. Ho. 4 No. 2ee
O-12t SH 2.2e
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL ~E~RIPTI~
Optimum moisture - 8.2 ~ IMPORT HRTERI~
~ximum ~W de~itg = 188.3 pc~ ~RHB~Stlt9
· ,~. I',', , :'~,~, .... ; ,, '' . ~ .... ' ....
P~o~ect Ho.: ~94-8~2 Rem~ks:
P~oiect: ~OC~ SAMPLE~ ~Y: R. CAMPO0
Locat t~n~ ~ELORE~ ~TREET LOCATIOH: OH-SITE
BAKERSFIELd, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE ~ATE: e4/11/~4
PROCTOR 'rEST REPORT '[
T~ TWIHIHO ~ORflTORIEO~ INC. F19a~e No. 2
APR 28 '94 13:18 THIMIMG LABS, BFKLD P. 11/14
PROCTOR TE~T REPORT
'- ': 'l" i -~. -'
1~ ~.- _ , ,, . _.__ ~ .... , ~' i ........
..:~ . .,_. ~ ~..... " ~ ~. ~ --
' r ' ' ...........
i : ': "" ' .... '" ' "
, _ . I ~ ,,
'Modi~ied' Proctor~ R~TM · 1~2~ Method C
~epth US~. ~8~0 ~ts~, No. 4 H0,288
TEST RE~LTS MRTER I RL ~ESCR I PT I ~
optimum. ~ist~re = &.2 ~ A~eEEeRTE ~RSE, ROCK
H~ximum ~V den~itu = 1~.6
P~oJec~ No,: 994-8~2
P~o~ec~: U~CRL . SAMPLE9 SY: ~. 80~RZN8
~RKERSFIEL~ C~IF~NIA GRMPLE ~ATE~ e4/14/~4
PROCTOR TEST REPORT
T~ TWIHIHG ~ORRTORZES~ INC. ~ Figure No. ~
October 23, 2000
Mr. Dan Truzzolino
Tosco Corporation
P. O. Box 2628
Santa Fe Springs, Ca 90670 0628
RE: Tosco Bulk Plant 0959, 524 Dolores Street in Bakersfield
FIRE CHIEF Dear Mr. Truzzolino:
RON FRAZE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES This'is t'o inform you that this department has reviewed the result of thc Soil
2101 ~H" Street Sampling Report dated September 15, 2000 associated with the hydrocarbons
Bakersfield, CA 93301
VOICE (661) 326-3941 previously detected near the surface water outfall on the west side of the site.
FAX (661) 395-1349
SUPPRESSION SERVICES Based upon the information provided, this department has determined that
2101 "H" Street appropriate response actions have been completed and that, at this time, no further
· Bakersfield, CA 93301 investigation, remedial or removal action or monitoring is required at the above stated~
VOICE (661) 326-3941
FAX (661) 395-1349 address. ~
PREVENTION SERVICES Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a satisfaction
171 ~Choster Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93301 or release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result of past,
VOICE (661) 326-3951
tAX (661) 326-0578 current, or future operations at this location. Nothing in this det. ermination is intended'
or shall be construed to limit the rights of any parties with respect to claims arising
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES out of or relating to deposit or disposal at any other location of substances removed
1715 Chester Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93301 from the site. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to limit
VOICE (661)326-3979 or preclude the Regional Water Quality Control Board or anyother agency from
FAX (661) 326-0576
taking any further enforcement actions.
TRAINING DIVISION
5642 Victor Ave. This letter does not relieve the tank owner of any responsibilities mandated
Bakersfield, CA 93308
VOICE (661)399-4697 under the California Health and Safety Code and California Water Code if existing,
FAX (661) 399-5763 additional, or previously unidentified contamination at the site causes or threatens to
cause pollution or nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or water
quality. Changes in land use may require further assessment and mitigation.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (661)
326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Office of Environmental Services
'cc: Gary D. Barker, Horizon Environmental
S:\USTFORMS\UST. L8
BAKERSFIELD
FIRE DEPARTMENT
July 29, 1998
Mr. Steven R. Truesdale
Project Manager, Remediation
Tosco Distribution Company
FIRE CHIEF P.O. Box 2628
MICHAEL R. KELLY
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
ADMINISTRAIIVE SERVICES RE: Tosco Bulk Plant No. 0959, Located at 524 Dolores Street in the City of Bakersfield
2101 'H' Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3941 Dear Mr. Truesdale:
FAX (805) 39,5-1349
in your letter of July 1, 1998, you had asked our office to review the Due Diligence Report,
SOPPRF3S~ON SEmnCES dated February 12, 1998, prepared by Pacific Environmental Group. You had also asked for concurrence
2101 'H' Street from this office that "no additional work is required at the site."
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3941
IAX (805)395-1349 Based upon the findings of the above referenced report, this office cannot provide you, at this
time, with that assurance. The "no further action" letter of February 7, 1995, pertained to the .
PRLWENTION SERVICES investigation surrounding the removal of the underground tanks orily. That same letter, as you can read
1715 Chester Ave. therein, does not relieve the owner of responsibilities attributed to additional or previously unidentified
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3951 contamination. Such may be the case concerning the hydrocarbons detected by the hand auger sample
FAX (805)326-0576 near the "surface water outfall" on the west side of the site.
If the hydrocarbon contamination at this location is emblematic of contaminated storm water
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1715Chester Ave. runoff, you should address this occurrence in compliance with a Spill Prevention Control and
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Countermeasure Plan (SPCC), pursuant to 40 CFR 112 and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan,
(805) 326-3979
FAX (805) 326-0576 pursuant to a Notice of Intent to discharge storm water associated with an industrial activity. Each of
these requirements are within the purview of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
You may contact that agency directly at (209) 445-5553 for further assistance.
TRAINING DIVISION
5642 Victor Street
Bakersfield, CA 93308 If you wish to receive a "no further action" letter pursuant to the Due Diligence Report recently
(805) 399-4697 submitted, it will be necessary for you to conduct further investigation to delineate the full vertical and
FAX (805)399-5763 lateral extent of the hydrocarbon contamination in the vicinity of the surface water outfall area, and
'propose an acceptable corrective action measure, including at a minimum, compliance with SPCC and
storm water pollution prevention requirements.
Additionally, our office may be able to provide you assistance in consolidating the
aforementioned requirements into a comprehensive Facility Compliance Plan. The City of Bakersfield
has been designated by Cai/EPA as a Permit Consolidation Zone, and is authorized to coordinate all the
various Cai/EPA agency requirements for businesses within Bakersfield. If you have any questions, or
would like to participate in the Facility Compliance Plan process, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H..Wines, Ill
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Office of Environmental Services
HHW/dm
San Ramon, California 94583
Telephone'(510) 867-0760
Facsimile (510) 277-2309
NodhRegion '' ' ' '- Bakersfield Fire Department
Corporate Environmental Remediation & Technology
. ~, :. Hazardous Materials Division
2101 "H" Street
BakerSfield, California 93301
~OC~ BULK P~ ~09~9
524 Delores Street
................................. Bakersfie'l~,. California..:
Dear Mr. Wines:
Again, I would like to thank you for your timely response to the closure
request for the Bakersfield bulk plant. With some agencies, closure
requests from oil companies are given such a low priority that a return
letter'~takes ~several weeks if not months. It has' been a pleasure
working with you.
If you have any questions concerning any other Unocal sites, please
feel free to contact me at (510) 277-2334.
Sipcerely,/]
senior Environmental Enqineer
cc: R. E. Bock
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
February 7, 1995
FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Robert Boust, Senior Environmental Engineer
Unocal Corporation
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400
San Ramon, CA 94583
RE: Tank Closure at 524 Dolores Street, in Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Boust:
This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results of the Soil
Investigation Report dated November 28, 1994 associated with the Unocal Bulk Plant #0959.
Based Upon the information provided, this department has determined that appropriate
response actions have been completed, that acceptable remediation practices were
implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial or removal action or
monitoring is required at the above stated address.
Nothing in this determination shall constitute or be construed as a satisfaction or
release from liability for any conditions or claims arising as a result of past, current, or future
operations at this location. Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to
limit the rights of any parties with respect to claims arising out of or .relating to deposit or
disposal at any other location of substances removed from the site. Nothing in this
determination is intended or shall be construed to limit or preclude the Regional Water Quality
Control Board or any other agency from taking any further enforcement actions.
This letter does not relieve the tank owner of any responsibilities mandated under the
California Health and Safety Code and California Water Code if existing, additional, or
previously unidentified contamination at the 'site causes or threatens to cause pollution or.
nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or water quality. Changes in land use
may require further assessment and mitigation.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (805)-326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Technician
HHW/ed
cc: J. Castillo, RWQCB
Unocal Corporation i~l' ·
2000 Crow Canyon Pla~l~uite 400
San Ramon, California 94583
Telephone (510) 867-0760
Facsimile (510)277-2309
LINOCAL
February 1, 1995
Howard H. Wines, III
No~hRegion Bakersfield Fire Department
Corporate Environmental Remediation & Technology
Hazardous Materials Division
2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
UNOC~ BULK PLANT ~0959
524 Delores Street
Bakersfie14, California
Dear Mr. Wines:
This is in. response to your January 9, 1995 letter requesting
documentation to verify the soil has been removed from this site,
Attached for your review and use are copies of the non-hazardous waste
manifests and the weighmaster tickets provided to Unocal by Jervicon,
Inc. out of Santa Maria, Ca.
If you have any questions or need any additional information about this
site or any other site please contact me at (510) 277-2334.
Sincerely,,/
Senior Environmental Engineer
attachments
cc: Ron Bock w/o
Tom Hollis w/o
NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's US EPA ID No. T Manifest 2. Page 1
~. Docum. ent ~No
WASTE MANIFEST ........... I().o.c,~.c:;'. of
3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address
4. Generotor's Phone ('~(~-'") '~' ~- ~ ~.~ ~
Name/ 6. US.~EPA.~ID Number A. Transpo~er
7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transpoder's Phone
I
9. besignated Facili~ Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Faciliff's Phone
.0
11. Waste Shipping Nameand Description ~C~n' ~n, ~O~ 12. Containers Total
D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federai regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous
'~('~Printed/Typed~Name(..~ (~t' (-/~/ P~t~... '~b '[~[-~ ~+ Signature~.,f~ .'p____,~JV ~'~"t'~"'; ~ ~'~-''"~' Month Day Year
17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Prirtted/1 Signature
2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Year
I
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
Month Day Ye,
ORIGINAL -'RETURN TO GENERATOR
. WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE . :L.: __..~..~.. ,,,m0is a r'~"'"'nized autt~'ity ol accuracy, as ~esc~bed ~Y Cl~otw BILLING INFORMATION
- · ribedcon'um~tywaswei ed, maa. sumq._m'countm:l aweig~.ma?ter, vmosea .a.mm~M~su~m~ndardso~"~CallfomiaDepa~menl~f~:oodandAgrlcultum-
men ' with sect o~ 12700) o Division b o[ [ne urn.u... ~.,.,-,~ a , ~
YEGI HING L 1! Waste Is Weig' heal it ~5 100%No~bazarclous .: ............. : ............... out
..... WASH : -
u~, ~,'-,*-.-,~ ~.....-.,..: _:.: : ." ~; ' ~' ':'~-:'-'~'":'1-~~~ Z- :'."--~ ~ ': ~' ..~:.~;.x..-~- ~. -' .'~ ~'- /' ;~ '~ ~ '~";" nH " [ LAYERS · /
::::: .... :.::_: ..................................... . :;:;._::-:_-~;:~':~-..,--~::-~. ============================================ ..... F~EEUQ~
.: ..... oTHER.: ..................
..................'.~ l,, ~:-: ....... ' .............. 7?'- -: ~' ========================= ' ":'"-'~::-:' :':
-~ r ...... :': ~..: :-J'"'" m,:~,~:--t"~-/~4R::~:'i-' i :. "~ ~ -' ............................ ' ................................. ~' .... 7-:::::::::::::::::::::
NON-HAZARDOUS [7. Generator's US EPA ID No. 1 Manifest
~ Document Nc~
WASTE MANIFEST
Generator's Name and Mailing Address
4. Generator's Phone ( ~C~' ) ~"-
5. Transpo~er 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transpoder's Phone
7. T~anspoder 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Nu'~er B. Transpoder's Phone
9. Designate~ Faciliw Name an~Site AdSress 10. US EPA ID Number C. Faciliw's Phone
. ~,, ~ /
r~,t~ !~.- c~ ~ .0. ~, ...... ~ ......... . ~' .--.'
12. ~ontoiners 13.
1 1. Waste Shi~in~ Name and Bes~ription Total
b.
D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above ~ L E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
,. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste.
Pr nted/Typed. Name ' Signature-- t ~'/k MonthDayYear
17. Transpoder 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials .'
Printed/Typed Name /' /' ISi~nature. ,,'?~. ,.~," Month D6y
~.x~l .... ~/., ~'~: '"~, '~ "
>o~er 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials .......
Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day I
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
materials covered by:~his manifest except as noted in Item 19. r--) ' ~
· '~}'I'~ · , ~ ;"~. ?- ,~ ,' ~-'"~
' ~ t ~ Month
,~ ~ ~"~.'.,,~-',
TRANSPORTER ~2
NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's US EPA ID No. I- Manifest 2. Page 1
~. Document No.
,WASTE MANIFEST ........... ID.C,~o.o of ~
3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address
4. Generator'sPhone(~- ) ~ff~'~o
6. US EPA ID Number ~ Phone
5. Transpo~er 1 Company Name
7. TranspoMer 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transpo~er's Phone
9. Design~e~ocili~ Name a~ Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facili~'s Phone
11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containers 13.
Total
b.
D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above I E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste.
Printed/Type~LName Sign.~,d~ ~. ~~ Month Day Year
17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year
18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Year
I
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
Printed/] Month Day Year
"' '-~.":~. NOi~-HAZARDOUS .,: 1. Generator's US EPA ID No.' :':~ .:"~'~: ..... 'Manifest'
· ' '." WASTB, · ' ' ......
4. Generator's Phone ( ~g.(~ )~ <'~ - ~A, I~ '
Company Name '~ ~ ' 6. US EPA ID Number ' A. Transpo~er's Phone
V'-.~-;':'~O-:".~ .Z/.,~ t~. r.. ~ ~ ~_:~ .,.~.--. r~
Company Name 8. ' U~'EPA ID Number ' B. TranspoHe~'s P~one ..... ...
9. Designated Facili~ Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facili~'s Phone . .
" kT'h' ~'O¢.,'~-z-g-~..~-~. , ~c. '~ ...,.' .-::/ ',
' : ;- :~ ~ 12. Containers 13.' *" " 14.
1.1. Waste Shipping Name and pti0n No-' ' I Total
............... ~"' I Typ~ Quanti~ I
,A~itio~al Desc~ptions for Mat~rials~Listed Above' ~ · "~ . ,' ~ ' ~ E. Handling Coaes for Wastes Listed ~bove
15. Special Handling Instrudions and Additional Information
]6. G~.NERkTOR'S CERTIFI¢~.TION: I ce~tiJy the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for repmting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste.
~Printed/Typed Nqme I Signature ~ ~.~. I~' Month Day Year
17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name / Signature Month Day
'18. Transporter 2~~.cknowledg~ of Receipt ,rials
Printed/Typed Name Signature . Month Day lear
9. Discrepancy Indication Space
20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials Covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. ~ ....
/ :, ~z._~._: : .",, ' ,'. . - ....
* Prihted/Typed N~.~.-- .;--'-~ J Signat~r,e '~ ~: Month Day
· .,>i) t / '" ~ "~ '~ ~ '~ "
· .~,.. '/,,. ~:,~ 2' .':.' :.~. ,' '
~ENERATOF~800PY-
3. Genera~tor's-Nans~e and ~ilin~ Address
7. Tran~po~er 2.Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transpo~er's Phone
9. Designated Facili~ Nome and Site Address 10. U5 ~PA ID Number C. Facili~'s Phone
11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containe~ 13.
Total
b.
:D?~d~itional Descriptions for Materials Listed' :A'boye I E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
1.5. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subiec~ to federaI regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste.
Printed/Typed Na~me~ .... Signatu~.~ .',f...~-rL/ -- ~"~ L Month .Day Year
17. 1. -
Printed/TypedTransp°rter"?"!~'~'~"Ackn°wledge:ent°fReceipt°fMaterialsNqme h'*~:~ ' ~
18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Pr!nted/Typed Name . i Signature Month Day Year
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
20. Facility Owner,.~ ....... or Operato.TL.Certification.. - of receipt of waste materials covered,, ~'-'/-by/this manifest except as noted,, ini,,.Item 19. ~,,~ ~:;~,, ~,~ ',.~,~ · '-
//~" '; : ; / '-/ ,~ . ~' . .L,-' · ~-~ z ·
Printed/Typed· Name ~ . 1 Signature Month Day Year
'-/: ..~,,..'t -/- ~.~.."...~.,. '?' ~' .." .'..~ "' ..'.
'~,WASTE MANIFEST
7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. 'us EPA ID Number. ' B. TranspoHe/s Phone
'9. Designated Facili~ Name and Site Address 10. ' US EPA ID Number C. Facili~'s Phone '
D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above ~f ~ndling Codes for Wostes Listed Above
15. SJ~eciol Handling Instructions and Additional Information
d":' :.~ ~,,~,,-'~,.,:~,. .... ., -r ....', ,.' ..... :
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~i~ the materials de~ribed above on this manife~ are n~ subje~ to f~eml r~ulations for reposing proper dispoml of Hazardous Waste.
Name Signature c' - . Month ~y Year
17. TranspoHe~ 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ;Printed/Typed. ~ Signal' r~ ~~~ . Month '
2 Acknowledgement o{ Receipt of ~erluls
Printed/Typed Name .~ Signature . Month ~y Year
19.. "-.'Discrepan~ Indication Space,. .... ' ' . . ' "' }~4:{ ' :':'.'. ~. :~ .._..-'{ .'" ":"' " '' ' ' .- ...' ""', . .":.:.':'-"
. .. :. ..... :' · .... ~ ~U':-:' .,.. '~.~' '~:
'~ *?':~NON-HAZARDOUS :.?::::'~
~: Generator's:US
'~.'- WASTE MANIF~T .....
Gen~* ~me and Maili~Address .' . - ~' ~
4. Generat0'~sPhone('~'t~) ~-~'~y ·
5. Trans~er 1 Company Name '. ~1~; US EPA ID N~r
7, 'Tronspo~er 2 Compony Nome 8, US. EPA ID Number: :
9, Oes gnoted Focili~ Nome ond ~ite Address - 10, · US EPA ID N~mbr . TronsponeFs Phone
~ ~: 1/' ~'~ ~ ~' [~1 ~1'(: Transpo~eFs Phone
,~ ,~ :~ '~:: ~.l ~/ .::~ ~t~ C. Fac~s Phone
I(
I 1. Woste 5hipping Nome ond Description ~:~ ' 1~, Cont~inen 13,
, Total
D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above t ~ E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
15. SpeciatHandling Instru~ons and Additional Information
16. GENERATOR'S CERTJFI¢TION: I ce~i~ the materials de~ribed above on this manifeg are ~ subj~.'~.federal regu~i~s ~r repo,ing proper disposal of Hazard Waste.
Month
:Printed/Typed Name ~-. ....
17. Transpoder 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials . , ff
18. Transpoder 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month ~y Year
19. Discrepan~ Indication Space
~r O erato: Ce~ifi~ation:.of rec~t o~aste m~e~ials.c~er~ by th,~.mo~,f~ excep~ as~t~ ,n ~e~..
GENE T0 --
CITY of BAKERSFIELD'
"we. c,4Re."
FIRE DEPARTMENT ' 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF January 9, 1995 3~s-3911
Mr. Robert Boust, Senior Environmental Engineer
Unocal Corporation
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400
San Ramon, CA 94583
RE: Unocal Bulk Plant #0959 at 524 Dolores Street in Bakersfield
Dear Mr. Boust,
I have reviewed the soil investigation report dated November 28, 1994 for the
above referenced site.
This office disagrees with Unocal's technical opinion that"no further envirOnmental
work is required at this site at this time" in that the contaminated soil excavated frOm the
northwest corner of the tank pit has not been properly disposed of pursuant to Title 23,
Chapter 15, Article 2, section 2522(b).
Please submit documentation verifying the proper transport and disposal of the
contaminated soil waste pile. Site closure will be reviewed again once subsequent
documentation supports that the contaminated soil waste pile has been removed from
the site and properly disposed of.
If you have any questions, please call me at 805-326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Technician
HHW/dlm
cc: W. Gross, GeoResearch
Unocal Corporation ~
2000 Crow Canyon Pla~ite 400
San Ramon, California 94~83
Telephone (510) 867-0760
Facsimile (510) 277-2309
UNOCAL
December 27, 1994
Howard H. Wines, III
NodhRegion Bakersfield Fire Department
Corporate Environmental Remediation & Technology
Hazardous Materials Division
~EC~I--~VE 2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
~0 UNOCAL BULK PLANT ~0959
524 Delores Street
'"~A~ O/~ Bakersfiel4, california
Dear Mr. Wines:
Thank you for your letter dated December 21, 1994 concerning the
referenced bulk plant site. In your letter you requested the submittal
of a corrective action plan as required by section 2725(c) Article 11,
Title 23 CCR. Based on the results of the subsurface investigation
performed by Georesearch and documented in the attached Soil
Investigation Report dated November 28, 1994, it is Union Oil of
California's (dba Unocal) technical .opinion that no further
environmental work is required at this site at this time.
The attached report documents the drilling of two soil borings per the
workplan submitted to your office and approved by you in your letter to
Tom Hollis of Georesearch dated July 26, 1994. This work was performed
at your request to delineate the vertical and lateral extent of
impacted soil previously identified during the removal of the
underground storage tanks. The results of this investigation and the
previous work documented in Georesearch's Tank Closureand Preliminary
Site Assessment Report dated April.29, 1994 indicate the following:
1. The source of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil have been
removed.
2. The location and volume of impacted soil has been identified
and is limited to a small area on the northwest corner of the
former UST area.
3. Soil containing petroleum hydrocarbons extends to less than 40
feet below ground surface (bgs) and ground water beneath the
site is approximately 190 feet bgs.
4. Benzene was not detected in any soil sample.
5. The site is an operating bulk plant and.there are no plans to
change this property usage.
In summary, the source of contamination has been removed and the extent
of impacted soil has been delineated. Groundwater is over 150 feet
below the deepest identified soil contamination and does not appear to
be threatened. The hydrocarbons in the soil do not contain any benzene
which indicates an older product which no longer contains the lighter
petroleum components. Based on these facts, it is Unocal's technical
opinion that further environmental remediation is not warranted at this
site at this time. If you have any questions regarding this letter,
please feel free to contact me at (510) 277-2334.
Senior Environmental Engineer
attachment
cc: Ron Bock w/o
-~ - SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
'" ' '"'."i' ·uNocAL BULK PLANT 0959
'"- ..... 524 Dolores .Street
· --' ..---. - ' Baki~r~sfield, California
prepared for
UNOCAL Corporate Environmental Remediation and Technology
___ ~ prepared by
GeoResearch
- . a Division of GEOSERVlCES.
- a California Corporation'
3427 Miguelito Court,' Unit A
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
(805) 546-9100 -
........ November 28, 1994 ._ ~
.... ' '9560600500
;!: - - ..~ _ PROFESSIONAL'CEFITIFIOATION AND LIMITS OF LIABILi"I'~ .' .... '.'..'~ .' .... ,.~]'iii
-" ,2.O- SITE BrACKGROUND ...... ' :": t''"'' '- ..... , ;. :,...-.' ..... ........ -. '1
i.- -- ., 3.0 .SOIL INVESTIGATION- ' = - ' ] .'... ;... :-,..'. 2
' - .... ' 3.1 FIELD PROCEDURES · 2
"'~'=-'' 3.2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS ..... 3
·:,=-... ..-4.0 ORATORY RESULTS' .....-'. ..................... · ..... 3
5.0 ' CONCLUSIONS ' - .. · ' 3
6.0 -REFERENCES '-. ........ '... ,. :...'.. ~ ........................ 5
i = . FIGURES
- ~, Figure. 1' Project Location~
-. Figure 2: Site Plan
'.' Figure 3: Soil Sample Locations During UST Removal
" ~' . Figur, e 4:Boring Locations
-. 'Figure 5:~ .Cross Section-A-A' - Distribution of Soil.containing Petroleum
,~ -~ ~ Hydrocarbons
TABLES
., Table 1:' Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected During UST Removal
Table 2: Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected From Soil Borings
APPENDICES
-- Appendix A: Drilling and S0il Sampling prOcedures
· , Appendix B:' Field Logs of Boring
Appendix C: Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Documentation
..... . PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY
Information provided id thi~ report fo'r Gee_ResearCh Project 9560-600500 is iintended
exclusively for Unocal Corporate Environmental Remediation and Tec. hnologY for the.
evaluation.of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil as it pertains to'the-subject propertY at the ..
time the d~.ta were'collected. The Professional ServiCes provided have been Performed
in accordance~with practic'es generallY acceptedby other_geologists: hydr01ogistS,- '
hydrogeologists, engineers and environmental scientists working in this field. No other
warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. As with all subsurface investigations,
there is no-gua, rantee that the work conducted will identify any or all sources or
locatiOns of petroleum hydrocarbons-in the subsurface.
This repOrt is issued with the understanding that Unocal CorpOrate Environmental
Remediation and Technology is responsible for ensuring that the information contained
herein is brought to the attention of the appropriate regulatory agency. This report has
been reviewed by a geologist who is registered in the State of California a~nd whose
s~gnature and license number appear below.
n ~.~__---.-J"" Warren A: Gross, CEG 152.8
-,~,,~orStaf~eologist~ .. ~
Assoc_iate
Ge01ogist ~
Thomas J.
Associate'Geologist ,~. ~,,
: ' : :I.O--INTRODUC'i'ION
· ~ .~ This~reporrP~esents t'he results of a soil investigation Conducted at.Former UnOcal. Bulk'
Piant 0959, 524-Dolores Street, ' Bakersfield, California (Figures 1-and 2) for Unocal
' '-i;''Corporate 'Remediation and TechnOlogy (Unocal-C-ERT). The investigation .was
conducted On '-August-2, 1994 in'response to a request, from the Bakersfield Fire
i ~'_~ ' Department (BFD) outlined in a' letter, to UnocaI-CERT dated June. 1; 1994. :The purPose
" of the investigation is to ~evaluate_ the distribution-of soil containing petroleum
....- ':" . hydrocarbons in an area'formerly occupied by underground storage tanks (USTs).
....... ~- "2.0 SITE BACKGROUND
i:' :'.-~-i: ';' '~: ;' . On April.l-, 1994, five 20,000~gall0n'and bne 10,000-gall°n USTs used to store gasoline,
- - d!esei, and/or motor oil. and-one 550-gallon UST used to store Waste :oil-were removed
-. -- from. the site(Figure .2).- Following UST removal, soil samples' were collected for
...~'"_-. · laboratory.analysiS from 2 and 6 feet below each of the USTs:(Figure 3). EXcept for soil
.... samples collected-from the northwest corner of the UST 'pit, total purgable petroleum
.... _ hydrocarbon 'as.gasoline (TF'PH-G), benzene, toluene', ethylbenzene, and total xylene
~'-.._ -'- --" (BTEX) concentration were not detected in the samples and total extractable petroleum
· hYdrocarbon as diesel (TEPH-D) concentrations were between not detected and 2.7
· milligram per k!logram (mg/kg; Table 1). Soil in the'northwest corner of the UST area
. -.appeared be stained;-therefore, a test pit was excavated in this area to evaluate the.
-. '' distribution of soil Staining.. This test.pit was excavated to a depth of 35 feet below
' . , ground Surface (bgs)'and a soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis from the
..... ~--~ ' test pit. at 1.4 and .35 feet bgs. Results of the laboratory analysis indicate that .the samPle
__-' .?. collected from approximately 14 feet-bgs contained 8,400 mg/kg TEPH-D and 3,600
. mg/kg TPPH-G (Table 1)~' The samPle collected from the bottom of the test pit at 35 feet
'· · bgs contained 1,700 mg/kg and 2,000 .mg/kg TPPH-G. Concentrations of benzene,
toluene, ethy!benzene, and total xylenes.were not detected in either of these samples.
According to the laboratory, the petroleum hydrocarbons, in the samples from this area
; : appeared to'be weathered·diesel.
" 'Stained-soil excavated from the northwest corner Of the former UST area and soiJ
excavated from the-former waste_.~_-0i__l.~UST area wasst~0~oc~pil.ed~separately~f,r, om~S~il~
Excavated to expose the USTs prior to (~mo_v~al.. Soil samples were collected from the
.. stockpde of sod excavated to expose the US/s ana these samples were analyzed for total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) in accordance with EPA Method 418.1. The laboratory
analysis'resu!~ts indicated that soil in this stoCkpile contained TRPH concentrations ranging
.. from not detected to 360. mg/kg. Based on-these analyses, soil containing 'FRPH
-' ~' ' -~oncentrati°ns above 100 mg/kg was segregated from the rest of the Stockpile and, with
· ~- ... the apProval of Mr. Howard Wines of BFD, this soil~was ~used to backfill the northwest
· corner of the UST area. The remaining s0il from'this stockpile was Used to backfill the
'~ .~ : other areas of'the UST pit. Soil from this stockPile'filled the.UST pit to about 6 feet' belOw
I ~ ' -'~ grade and clean imported fill was used to fill the UST pit UP-to grade.
!, .... . i - stained soiFexcavated from,.,.~ the~ ~ northWester,, . ~ corner of tt:ie~tank,~.~..~..~,,...~..,~,~,~...~.~,..~,pit and from the-waste-oil' -
"r -. ' - -UST area was stockpded ~n the no~~~,~p~rgB.~.2¢y.- T~h~s soil is currently,
:'- '. '.: ".. ~~g~.~il~ggn~e~.during ~e
'. ' : subject inv__~. ~ of.-_~~'~p_iled soil· is pending identific~ati, on?.~Epr~o~
· d~sposal alternabve~ Results from the tank removal are d~d ~~oResearch s Ta
· .-~ ~nd-~~inary Site Assessment Report, dated April 29, 1994.
Based on a Kern Countyr:Water Agency (KCWA) report' dated 1993,' there are two water
i- ~· wells that penetrate. the unconfined aquifer approximately one mile north and'northeast
of the project site. Based on data from this rePort, depth to water in the area of the
~. Subject property is 190 feet bgs.~ . ~
· 3.0 'SOIL INVESTIGATION
3.1 FIELD PROCEDURES
The soil. investigation included drilling two borings and collecting'soil samPles from the.
borings for- laboratory analysis. The first boring (boring B2, Figure 4) was drilled in the
~.. northwest.corner of the former UST area. The purpose of this boring was to evaldate the.
' vertical extent of soil Containing pet.roleum hydrOcarbons. Samples were Collected.from
-thiS boring at 10, 20, 30, 40, 45, and50 feet bgs. This boring was adVanded to 10 feet
. below the depth where soil did not appear to contain petroleum hydrocarbons based on'
organ!c Vapor analyzer (OVA).readings, staining, and odor
The second boring. (boring 'B1) was drilled adjacent to the north side of the former UST
area (Figure 4) to evaluate the I~iteral distribution of soil containing petroleum'
hydrocarbons. Samples were collected from this boring 'at five foot intervals beginning
at'fi~)e feet bgs to the total depth of this boring at 45 feet bgs. Based on field
- observations and OVA readings, soil in the area of this boring did not appear to contain
. petroleum_hydrocarbons. GeoResearch procedures for drilling and soil sampling are in
~ Appendix A. Field logs of boring are in Appendix B.
Both borings were backfilled with a cement-bentonite slurry. Drill cuttings were stockPiled
on plastic, and covered with plastic at the northeast portion of the site adjacent to soil
excavated during the tank removal operations.
2
.. "3.2 .FIELD oBsERVATi0Ns ~ .-. - .._. "... _ ' ' - .... · -. --.
Based on observatiOns' during drilling, native_ s°il beneath the site between ground surface
:. and 50 feet bgs .(the ~aximu_m depth 'of the bqdngs drilled for this investigation).is
comprised of unconsolidate_d layers of. s. apd .a_nd. silt (Appendix B). Backfill material
.- comprised .of sand and gravel was present.in the boring drilled in the former UST area
.(boring B2) between ground surface and 28 feet bgs. :The bottom of_former. UST pit is
I'
i -- estimated to haVe been approximately 15-feet .bgs;'therefore; this 'boring.was partially
.. drilled in the test. pit excavated during the UST r.e~oval. ThC sample colle._cted at 20 feet
? - bgs ~vaS"fr0m backfill-m:aterial and the Sample Collected from.30 feet bgs was collected
" .. '.. from. nat'ive Soil. - - -. ~- - -
" -~ - 4.0 LABORATORY RESULTS
SamPles collected from the.borings were analyzed' for TEPH-D in-accordance with a
- modified EPA Method 8015 and fOr TPPH-G and BTEX in accordance with EPA Methods
' : '- 8015 Modified/8020.' A summary of the laboratory_results is presented in Table 2. The
: . !aboratory?eports' and chaimo.f;custody documentation are in Appendix"C.
.Based on the laboratory a~al~/ses, samples Collected between 10 and 30 feet bgs from
'- the-boring, drilled in the northeast corner of the f_ormer UST area (boring B2) contained
TEPH-D concentrations ranging from 52 to 5,300 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).. TPPH,
G concentrations in thes_e samples ran_ged from not detected to' 960 mg/.kg. With the
'" 'exception of 0.74 mg/kg ethylbenzene and 1.3 mg/kg total xylenes in the Sample collected
'-30 feet bgs, TEPH-D, TPPH-G,~ and BTEX were not detected in the samples collected
from boring B2. ~- . '
: _ TEPH-D concentratibns-in samples colleCted from the boring drilled north of the former
UST area (boring B1) were between not detected and 10 mg/kg. Concentrations of
'._ ~ TpPH-G and BTEX Were nOt detected in any of the Samples from boring B1.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusiori~, are based'on the current and past investigations conducted at
the subject property. ': _~
~ Native Soii inthe northwest comer of the fOrmer UST area between 15 feet
bgs (the bottom of the former tank pit area) and 40 feet bgs contain
..... concentrations of TEPH-D and'TPPH~G (Figure 5). Samples of native soil
.... from this-area Contained TEPH-D concentrations ranging from 1,700 to
. -' .. : . 8,400 mg/kg and TPP~-G concentrations ranging from 960 to 1,1700. rog/kg
i' - ~ --: (Tables 1 and 2)
'. ~ Benzene and toluene Concentrations were not detected in samples of ~t~e
':.-"' '~' ~' ..... -' native soil that contained TEPH-D and-TPPH-G concentratiOns.
I. E!hyl'benzene iconcentrations in th~s-e samples` ranged from not detected
I~_' -.. --"i '-- -'and 0.74 mg./kg and total xYlOne concentrations in these, samPlos ranged
,-I . from not detected and l.3 mg/kg.
~. Ground ~water beneath' ih~' site apPears. t° be about 150· ber~eath soil
.... containing petroleum' hyCrocarbo~s in the former UST area
!'
i
REFERENCES
-- 60 .......
. GeOR~/search, 1994,.-Tank Closure'and PreliminarY Site Assessmerit-Repo~t,APril 29,
~_ .~ 1994 (unpublished report)l. ~ . .... -
'- .- Kern: County Water Agency,- Water Supply Report,'1992, December -1.993, 80pp,
FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location
Figure 2: Site Plan
Figure 3: Soil Sample Locations During UST Removal
Figure 4: Boring Locations
Figure 5: Cross Section A-A' - Distribution of Soil Containing Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Ii-IH
NORTH
o 1/2 I u~LE
OeoResearch
PROJECT LOCATION
REFERENCE: U.S.O.S. TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE ' UNOCAL BULK FUEl.lNG 'E~MINAL 0959
7.5 MINUTE SERIES 524 DOLORES STREET
OILDALE, CALIFORNIA 1954 BAKERSF1ELDo CAUFORNIA
OIL CENTER, CALIFORNIA 1954 OEORESEARCH PROJECT 9460602100
OOSF'ORD, CAUFORNIA 1954
LAMONT, CAEFORNIA 1954 DATE: 3/17/94 ICKD BY: IFIOURE NO.: I
FILE NO:. PROd[.OCI IDRAWN BY: RSM
I
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF UST
UST~
.... ..... ..... .....
~ ..... LOADIND
RA~K
z
WAREHOUSE
SIDEWA~ DiRT
DOLORES STREET
0 20 40 80
I
SCALE IN FEET
OeoResearch
SI'TE-P -I.~AN'
UNOCAL BULK FUEl.lNG TERMINAL 0959
524 DOLORES STREET
BAKER b'~IEI.Do CAUFORNIA
GEORESEARCH PRO4ECT 9480~02100
C~D BY: N~ 2.
FILE NO:. DRAWN 'B~.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF' WAY
· ~ EGEND
I ! APPROXIMA'TE Ubll'rS OF UST
...... i E×CAVA'I10N S
X~----X----..-X- ......
× 7<' '~ X × '~ X --X- X ~---~
~ . WASTE-OIL ........... ~...
r'7"'~'7'<~-'1'"' UST : NUMBER AND LOCATION OF REMOVED
I : :1 . ~ ..............USI's
IiX
~'" .......... ' NSW-14 X NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCA'IION
WO-2 F ....-x ...... '2~51q'-2 ...."Z2TN'-Z 220N-)_ oF' SOIL SAMPLES
I
BARREL ~VO-6 ,.~ 28N-.2.- ................. 22,3N..-:..6 ............ ~,2,.1. ~..-T.6 .............
s'rORAGE 3~8N~3~ ~ x ~ x i~ x i!x !~ x
AREA '~' : ~2 4N--~ ~22N-~ "~20N-~
=~ 224N-.~. ~222N-~ i220N-~6 '
328S-2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I I I I
GRAVEL I,,,~-~,~ v: X '
.AREA xx 223S-2: 12.21S-~i
x 2.'23S-~ i221S-6i
" x i x ii x i! x ii x
', 224S-2 222S-2 220S-2~
~,~24S-6 222S-6 220S-6~ -roP-
.LOADING
RACK
10 20 40
i , / SCALE IN FEET
_.u PARKING AREA AND WAREHOUSE
eo esea
· ,,, I ~E N~OE_SOIL_SAMELES
a. ' R A ~S ~O_WI. N .G_L O_C~A ~ 0
13_ UNOCAL BULK FUELING I'E~MINAL 0959
; 524 DOLORES STREET
; BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA
GEORESEARCH PRO,.IECT 9460802100
BY: RGURE N~
59-- 3 DRAtltN BI':
SOUTHERN PAClRC RIGHT OF WAY
~'RO~'ER'n' BOUNDARY
X'-- -- X- -- ' '-X- ' -- -X' - --'X' X ×* 'X FE--'~c~" *X"-- --X-' --
I : :1 B1
L ~.......
Ld r~ <~ ........................ : ...................................................
~ ~ ~ I WASTE-OIL B2 :
~: ~ ~ II UST LOCATION :
m~ i :
:
:
:
.:
:
k
\
\ :':
xx TOP-
x_ ....... LOADIN(~
RACK
LEGEND ~
NORTH
0 BORING LOCATION 0 20 40 80
I I
SCALE IN FEET
I APPROXIMATE UMITS OF UST (~ R h
I ~×C~V*~O.~ (~ e o e S e 0 r c
..... I
........ · . ..... BORING LOCATIONS
FORMER UST LOCATION UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
............... 524 DOLORES STREET
BAKERSRELD, CAUFORNIA
m SECTION LINE A- A' GEORES£ARCH PROJECT 9480602100
FILE NS 0959-5 DRAWN BY: C. MCGEE
A z A'
B1--5 ND/NO...--
20 B1--20 lO/ND ~ APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF'
al_~ NO/NO
i
3o m-3o NO/NO
,4o m-,m .o/No / NO/NP
/
B1-4,5 ND/ND B2-45 ~ ND/ND
_ 50 / 82-50 ~ ND/ND
/
TEST PIT
EXCAVA11ON"
GeoResearch
,310,/53 TEPH/I'PPH Ill U(=/~ 0 10 20 40
NO NOT OETECTED ~ ' ' ~ CROSS--S'ECllON A -- A'
SCALE IN FEET m'naBu'noN OF SOIL CONTAINING PE1ROLELIM HYDROCARBONS
UNOCAL BULK FUELING 11:RMINAL 0959
DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL CONTAINING 524 I~ STRELrl', BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
, ,,, , FILE: NO:. 0959--6 IDKAWN BY:. C.M~GEE
TABLES
Table 1' Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected During UST
Removal
Table 2: Laboratory Results of Soil Samples Collected From Soil
Borings
TABLE I .'
LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED APRIL 1, 1994
FROM BENEATH THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
UNOCAL BULK FUELING TERMINAL 0959
524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California
GeoResearch Project 9460602100
SAMPLE
SAMPLE DEPTH
ID (fi bgs) TRPH TPH-D TPH-G B T E X
220S-2 14 ND 1.6 ND ND ND ND ND
220S-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
220N-2 14 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
220N-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
221S-2 14 ND ............
221S-6 18 ND ............
221N-2 14 ND ' - .........
221N-6 18 ND ............
222S-2 14 ND ...... ......
222S-6 18 15 ............
222N-2 $ 4 19 ............
222N-6 ! 8 ND ............
223S-2 14 ND ND ..........
223S-6 18 ND ND. - .........
223N-2 14 19 ND ..........
223N-6 18 ND 2.7~ .... ....
224S-2 14 NE) ............
224S-6 18 ND ............
224N-2 14 ND ............
224N-6 18 . ND ...... ......
328S-2 14 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
3285-6 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
328N-2 14 3,600 8,400~ 6,800~ ND ND ND ND
328N-23'* 35 2,000 1,700~ 1,000~ ND ND ND ND
W/O-2 10 40 ............
WI0-6 14 15 ............
NSW-14 14 140 210~ 82~ ND ND ND ND
~Sample ID is indicated as 328N-35 on Sequoia Analytical laboratory reports (Appendix E),
TABLE I (continued)
NOTES: All values in milligrams per kilogram
fl bgs = feet below ground surface
TRPH = Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH-D = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
BTEX = Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes
I = Non-Diesel, Mix C13-C20
2 = Non-Diesel, Mix <C17
3 = Non-Gas, Mix >C8
4 = Non-Diesel, Mix C10-C16
5 = Weathered Diesel
Detection limits are indicated in laboratory reports, Appendix E.
All samples analyzed by Sequoia Analytical, Redwood City, California.
TABLE 2
LABORATORY RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES
Unocal Bulk Fueling Terminal 0959
524 Delores Avenue, Bakersfield, California
GeoResearch Project 9560600500
SAMPLE I DEPTH DATE TEPH-D TPPH-G B T E X
ID I (feet bgs SAMPLED mg/kg mg/kg ................ mg/kg .................
BORING B1
B1-5 5 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-10 10 8/2/94 1.6 ND ND ND ND ND
B1-15 15 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-20 20 8/2/94 10 ND ND ND ND ND
B1-25 25 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-30 30 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-35 35 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-40 40 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B1-45 45 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
BORING B2
B2-10 10 8/2/94 52 ND ND ND ND ND
B2-20 20 8/2/94 310 53 ND ND ND ND
B2-30 30 8/2/94 5,300 960 ND ND 0.74 1.3
B2-40 40 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
B2-45 45 8/2/94 N D N D N D N D N D N D
B2-50 50 8/2/94 ND ND ND ND ND ND
STOCKPILED SOIL
composite
I
DETECTION LIMITS 1.0 1.0 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
ANALYTICAL METHOD I EPA 8015 EPA 8015 EPA 8020
I
Mod Mod
NOTES: bgs ' = below ground surface'
~ TEPH-D = total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
TPPH-G = total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline
B = benzene
T = toluene
E = ethylbenzene
X = total xylenes
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
ND = not detected at laboratory limits of detection
All samples analyzed by Sequoia Analytical of Redwood City, California
APPENDIX A
DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES
METHODOLOGY: DRILLING PROCEDURES
The following outline presents methods and procedures employed during the drilling of
soil borings.
1. Borings are drilled with hollow-stem continuous-flight augers of either 6-inch
or 8-inch outside diameter.
2. During boring, a continuous log of the sediments is prepared by a staff
geologist in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System. These
logs are subsequently reviewed by a California-Registered Geologist with
experience in soils classification.
3. Soil samples are collected during boring in accordance with the procedures
outlined in the soil sampling section on the following page.
4. The auger lengths are steam-cleaned after successive borings to avoid
cross-contamination of soil samples.
5. Soil borings that are not converted to ground-water
monitoring wells are backfilled with a cement-bentonite slurry.
SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES FROM BOREHOLES
The following outline presents procedures for collecting soil samples during drilling of
borings with hollow-stem, continuous-flight augers.
1. Soil samples are collected using a 2.0-inch inside diameter, modified
California split-spoon sampler. The sampler is lined with three 6-inCh long
brass rings for containment of the soil samples.
2. To avoid cross-contamination of samples, the sampler and rings are
washed prior to each use with a trisodium phosphate solution and rinsed in
distilled water.
3. At the prescribed sampling interval, the sampler is attached to the drive rod
and driven into undisturbed soil below the lead auger with a 140-pound
hammer that is repeatedly dropped 30 inches until the sampler penetrates
18 inches. The number of drops is recorded for each 6-inch increment and
used to determine soil consistency and density.
4. The lead brass ring is recovered from the sampler, sealed by placing Teflon
seals and plastic caps onto both ends, labeled, placed in a Zip-loc bag, and
stored on ice while awaiting delivery to the laboratory for chemical analysis.
5. The sample is recorded onto a Chain-of-Custody form to ensure traceability
of the sample.
6. A classification of the soil obtained from the remaining rings is visually
determined, following the Unified Soil Classification system, and recorded
onto a boring log form.
APPENDIX B
FIELD LOGS OF BORINGS
GeoResearch
BORING~VELL I.D. 91
FIELD LOG OF BORING SHEET i OF 2
PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER ELEVATION AND DATUM I REFERENCE
UNOCAL 0959 9560600500
DRILLING COMPANY DRILLER' DATE & TIME STARTED I DATE & TIME COMPLETED
Melton Drilling Mike 08/02/94 1300I 08/02/94 1440
DRILLING EQUIPMENT METHOD DIRECTION OF BORING TOTAL DEPTH .
Mobile 9-53 []VERTICAL [] SLANT DEG. FROM VERT OF BORING 45 Feet, bgs
SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT TOTAL NO. BULK SS I OTHER
I
8" Hollow Stem Auger OFSAMPLES 9
DRILLING FLUID WATER LEVEL FIRST AFTER HOURS
Not Used
SAMPLER CA Modified Split Spoon HYDROGEOLOGIST/DATE CHECKED BY/DATE
TYPE DRIVING VV/. DROP Tom Bauman 08/02/94 W. Gross 11/30/94
WELL SAMPLES I
DEPTH CONST OVA GRAPH. SOIL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS REMARKS
(FEET) CSG FILL (PPM) NO. TYPE BLOWS I LOG ~CLASS
/6"I I(uscs)
._ Fill material to 2 feet bgs, sand
----'\ '~' ---- --~w' ~ -.~['°:'}'7%.:.?~":~ _~nd gravel
--:~ _'~ _ _ sp -
-- 3 Bl~5 -~- . SAND-Brown, fine to medium grained
-- \. ~-325 -- -~ith silt, unconsolidated
Z~ ~ Z Z Z
- ~ .~ _ _ Mn --
10- .~ - * -
-- ~ .~ 0.5 BI-10 ~-- SI----LT-Brown, unconsolidated,
Z.~ -~ 1_____330 Z ~lightl¥ moist
15-- .~ ~- 14 --
-- \' ~ 0.1 Bl-15 ~ SILT-As above, some fine grained
--< ~ [-335 -- -~and
.~ 0.1 B1L20 ~--~ S~'~T-Dark brown, unconsolidated,
Z .~ ~ ~-340 - ~enser than above silt, more
__ .~.~.. Z i -6ompacted
- - [ 8 Z
25-- X ,.x -i
Research
Geo
FIELD LOG OF BORING SHEET 2 OF 2
UNOCAL 0959 9560600500 Tom Bauman 08/02/94 W. Gross 11/30/94
WELL SAMPLES GRAPH. SOIL
DEPTH CONST OVA DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS REMARKS
(FEET) CSG ;FILL (PPM) NO. TYPE BLOWS LOG CLASS
/6' I (USCS)
.~.~h '~..~ 1.4 B1-25 10 ,.'~:.:".." SP SAND-Dark brown, fine grained, No odor
-- \.~.~\\ ~-345 ~nconsolidated, slightly moist,
-- ~ -- -- . .o./.. Tome silt
30-- . %. .:....,.,. --
-- 0.4 B1£30 -- SAND-Brown to rust, fine to medium
-- ~-352 ~rained, coarser than above sand,
__ _ __ ".~..'" ".'~' _~lightly moist
-- -- -- '.'i...'..~' '-. ~AND-Light brown, medium to coarse 1-2 foot
-- -- -- .'- '.': ~. ~rained, unconsolidated beach sand layer
-- - / z0 % ;..;,: ..... :.,. _
35-- -- 15 ,. . ..
__ 0.6 _B1-----35~_-~- I ML --SI---LT WITH CLAY-Rusty brown, dense No odor
-- -- / 17 "~ '%' ' ' · --
40-- >< .~<~ -- 25
-- ~'~'~ 0.1 B1-40 -~ S~D-Brown, fine grained, Doorly
-- ~.~.~ ~-425 -- "~ ' "': ~. ' ~orted, unconsolidated
_ _ _ ., .:.. ::.t _
-- 0.2 B1-45 ~ SILT-As above, brown, moist to No odor
-- ~-440 -~lightly dense, unconsolidated
-- - -- ~OTES: Total Depth - 45 Feet bgs
-- - -- '~oring backfilled with cement
-- - -- '~entonite slurry.
ii Z Z Z
' i Z Z
FIELD LOG OF BORING SHEET [ OF 2
PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER ELEVATION AND DATUM I REFERENCE
I
UNOCAL 0959 9560600500
DRILLING COMPANY DRILLER DATE & TIME STARTED I DATE & TIME COMPLETED
Melton Drilling Mike 08/02/94 1000I 08/02/94 1130
DRILLING EQUIPMENT METHOD DIRECTION OF BORING TOTAL DEPTH
Mobile B-53 []VERTICAL O SLANT DEG. FROM VERT OF BORING 50 Feet bgs
SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT TOTAL NO. BULK SS OTHER
8" Hollow Stem Auger OFSAMPLES 6
DRILLING FLUID WATER LEVEL FIRST AFTER HOURS
SAMPLER CA Mod±fied Split Spoon HYDROGEOLOGIST/DATE CHECKED BY/DATE
TYPE DRIVING W-I'. DROP Tom Bauman 08/02/94 W. Gross 11/30/94
WELL SAMPLES
DEPTH CONST OVA GRAPH. SOIL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS REMARKS
(FEET) CSG FILL (PPM) NO. TYPE BLOWS LOG CLASS
/6" (USGS)
.% -~and with gravel unconsolidated
-- .% ~ ~-O30 .' ~rained, 5% gravel, some silt odor
-- ~< .% -- '"' : -~ine grained, some silt
25
Research
Gee
FIELD LOG OF BORING SHEET 2 OF
UNOCAL 0959 9560600500 Tom Bauman 08/02/94 W. Gross 11/30/94
WELL SAMPLES
DEPTH CONST OVA GRAPH. SOIL DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS REMARKS
(FEET) CSG FILL (PPM) NO. TYPE BLOWS LOG CLASS
/6" (uscs)
- ~ .~ _ _ ..........:..r. _
-- .~ '3, _ -- ': :,.. ,.. _
--.~ .'>, -- _ ;:-,-:.'. :.... --
-- .~ .'~ -- _ '.'%..'.., · .. _
--~ .~, - ~ 5 .... -.'"..~., -
~- >, - ~ . ,'.,......: .;:.,.
30 ~'~ .~ 600 B2-30 ~'- ' SAND-Light brown, fine grained sand Strong
-- .~ ~-055 Z -~nconsolidated, no gravel, no hydrocarbon
Z .~ ~ _ . .~......:.~.. ~tainlng odor
-- .,< ~, -- ..'~......., - ..
-- .~ -- _ ., ..' .. ': :.,~
35-- .~ ~ -- - '"':"' .'..', --
--~ .~ ML
Z .', Z Z Z
4o-- .~, - ~2 -
-- .~ 18 S2-40 ~-~ S'~.T-Brown, slightly moist, no Trace
Z ~J'Q' -~' D02 Z ~taining hydrocarbon
--I.~.~ .~ _ _ _ odor
45-- .~ -- 12 --
-- .~ 1.0 B2-45 -~ SiLT-As above As above
-x'~ .~ :-l~O - -
- - -
50-- .~ -- 12
' 3 B2-50 __~-LTJAs above No odor
-- il30
-- -- - -~OTES: Total Del)th - 50 Feet bgs
-- -- - ~oring backfilled with cement
-- -- - -~entonite slurry.
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY RESULTS
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION
Sequoia 6,oChesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 lAX (510) 686.9689
Analytical ,,gSt,kerAvenu..S.,., S.c--.n,o, CA 95,,4 9,,-9. AX(9,, 92,.0,00
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-10 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
. Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-01 R.eP. orted: 0.8.].1..0~94
~!::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::FFF i i}FFJ}ili~i i llillli'.'i~} L"~}}~i~}}!ill iii iL'":illllliF.:i:iiiiFi:i:i: il }:ih' ~'.'?: L" :." ~}: :-: .: L::: :iL:ii!i!:. :::: :~..':~::i:::::::::: .:..':~ F,!i :,:i i li::i::ii:: }:.ii:}{ }:{}.: ~ill!}il :: :::i :."iii: :::L::::i::::::::.::{!~}
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel .................... 1.0 .................... 52
Chromatogram Pattern:
Non Diesel Mix ........................................ >C10
Surrogates Control Umits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 426 Q
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA, ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
~ndfe,~' Fulcher
Project Manager Page: 2
Sequoia 6.0 Ch.a..ke Drive .edwoodCir, CA {4,,, ,6.-9600 ,4,,, ,64-92.
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686.9689
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-10 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID .Extracted: 08/09/94
' ' Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-01 R..e.p. orted: 0_8~10/94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 84
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Project Manager Page: 3
Sequoia 6,0 Che.apeake Dr,ye RedwoodC,t,. CA ~,,~ ,~-,~00
19~ Bates Avenue, ~ite L Conco~, CA 94~20 (~10) 686-9600 F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical ~,9~,,~.~.~,~,,~, ~.~.~.~o,~ 0,,,~ ~,,~ ,,,.,~ ~,,~,,,.o,~
iii GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
iii 3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-20 Received: 08/08/94
iii San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
}ii · Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-02 R..ep..orted: 0.8.].10/94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel .................... 20 .................... 310
Chromatogram Pattern: ........................................ DIESEL
Surrogates , Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 0 Q
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Page: 4
Sequoia 680Chesapeake Drive Redwood air/, CA (4,5) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-92:13
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 [:AX (510) 686-9689
Analytical8,.S,.,.r^v=.S.,,e,. Sacramento, CA 9,8,4 (916) 9:ll-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite a Sample Oescript: B2-20 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-02 R..e.p..orted: 0..8].10]:94
::h:::::::::::m ma::,: :: m m::n::::::::::::::m:::::m :::::::::::::::::m n: ~:::::::=:::::::= ::::::::m::::m:mmm, ::Fi:ii=:ililli=.~i=.iii=.illl =.=.:=.=.=.~L":iFili~ililllii '..iii ii .=ii=.iiL" =. =. =. =. =.. =. o: =. '"'=.' °"=. L" =. =. =.' =.ii =. =. i =.i ilL"."." Fi il ~iiiilll '~ ~."i=.."i ."i =.."il =. ''' .".=..=. =. =. =. =. o =...=. ."L"."iii! =.~ ii! ."."i~ =. =. =.."i." =. ~ =. =. =. iii !i n il!i!ilillli=.illl."."." =. L"i =.i=. i i~=.il i=. ."i!i=; ."...iii .=.=.=.i L" =.i
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas .................... 10 .................... 53
Benzene 0.050 ,N.D.
Toluene 0.050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Non Gas Mix ........................................ >C7
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 94
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - El_AP #1210
Andrea/Fulcher
Project Manager. Page: 5
· ~ ~ Sequoia 680Chesa.eakeOr,ve Redwood C,.. CA(4,5~ 364-9600 ~14,5~.~-~.
19~ Bates Avenue, ~ite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-96~F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical819 Striker Avenue, ~ite 8 Sacramento, CA 958,4 (916) 921-96~ F~(916) 921-0,~
i{{'"~eoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-30 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Holl s Lab Number: 94084..,6=6-03 ....... R..e.p..orted: 0_8/.10].94
Total Extractable PetroleUm Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel .................... 100 .................... 5300
Chromatogram Pattern: ........................................ DIESEL
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recove_ry
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150
OQ
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
nA'~rea .F~her
Project Manager Page:
1900 Bates Avenu'e, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 ($10) 686-9600 FAX ($10) 686-9689
Analytical819Striker^venue, Suite8 Sacramen,o.C^ 9,8]4 (916} 921-9600 F~(916) 921-0,~
· i .................................................................................................................. ii ii i
iii"'~i'i~iS~'i{i'i~ii~'~' .......................................... Client Proj. ID: Unooal, O~S~ Sam~l~d: 08/0~/~4
3437 Empresa Drive Suite A Sample Descript: B2-30 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID ~racted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Anal~ed: 08/09/94
AEention Tom Ho s ' Lab Number: 9408466-03 RepoRed: 0~10/94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
' mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas .................... 50 .................... 960
Benzene 0.25 N.D.
Toluene 0.25 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene .................... 0.25 .................... 0.74
Xylenes (Total) .................... 0.25 .................... 1.3
Chromatogram Pattern:
Non Gas Mix ........................................ >C8
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 102
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210
Andrea Fulcher
Project Manager Page: 7
..- ~,A,;oe, uo a 6,0 Chesapeake DriveRedwood City. CA (415) 364-9600 lAX (415) ]64-923]
19~ Bat~ Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686.96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical ,,ggt,kerAvenu.,Suite8 Sac~mento. CA 958,4 {9.,6) 92,-96~ F~{916) 921.01~
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-40 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 ' Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 801,5 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention' Tom Ho s Lab Number: 9408466-04 R..ep. orted: 0_8.].10/94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
SurrOgates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 95
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEe UOIA/~A/~NALYTICAL ELAP #1210
,-Andrea/Fulcher
Proiect Manager Page: 8
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive RedwOOd City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) :164-9233
1900 Bates Avenue, ~uite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical ,,gSt.kerAve.ue, i., Sacramento, CA ,,,,,
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 · Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-40 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention' Tom Ho s Lab Number 9408466-04 ~..e.p..orted: 0..8~1,....0..~94
:: ::::::: ': ~ ~:..H:' '.".':~-~.:.."LL'.':.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ':
........ i~ i~ Lq~i~ii~i~i~i~i~ii~i ~ i :' ~i~i~H~~~:~::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::~:::::::::::~:::::::::
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 98
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Andrea Fu~dher
Proiect Manager Page:' 9
Sequoia 6,0Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) ]64-9600 FAX (4IS) ]64-91]]
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686.9689
Analytical 8,gSt,kerAve.ue,~,te8 Sacr, me.,o. CA 958,4 (9,,~ 9,,-9,00 ~AX{9,~92,.0,00
iii'"~'iiiS'l~'iii'ii'iiiirch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Samp ed: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-45 Rece ved: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention' Tom Ho s Lab Number 9408466-05 Rep..orted: 0.8.]..10/94
Total Extractable Petroleum HYdrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit. Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates · Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 95
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection,
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
~"~r~lc h e r
Project Manager Page: 10
,
Sequoia 680Chesapeake Drive Redwood CiW, CA (415) ]64-9600 lAX (415) ]64-92']
' 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686.9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
AnalYtical 8,gS,rikerAvenue, Suite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921.9600 FAX(916) 021-0100
iii'"~'~'~'~'~'~'~arch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-45 · Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on' Tom Hol s Lab Number' 9408466-05 R..e.P...orted: 0.8./.10~94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total)
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 84
Analytes reported as N.D, were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL El_AP #1210
AnY&
Fulcher
Project Manager Page: 11
Se uoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (4~5) 364-9:33
q 1900 Bates Avenue, ~uite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, ~ite 8 Sac~mento, CA 958,4 (9,6} 92,-9~ F~(916) 92,-01~
~ GeoResearch ............... Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
iii 3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-50 Received: 08/08/94
iil San Luis Ob spo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
}ii ' Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
'=' ' · m Ho s Lab Number' 9408466-06 , .... Rep..orted: 0..8]..10/..94
'" Attent on To :. ............ · ................
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
I'
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 93
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Andrea Fulcher
Project Manager Page: 12
' 1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 9,1520 ($10) 686.9600 FAX ($10) 686.9689
Analytical 8,,S,,~r^vena:.Su,., S~cr. mento, CA 0,8,4 C916) 911-9600 FAX (,,6} ,I,-OI00
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B2-50 ' Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on Tom Ho s Lab Number: 9408466-06 R..e.p..orted: 0..8~10~94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 98
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
An~a I~u~:her
Project Manager Page: 13
Sequoia 680Che.a,eak. O ve ',ed .ood
19~ Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520(510) 686-96~ F~ ($10) 686-9689
Analytical
i}i:::~'~'6'Oi'~'i'~ii~'~Fi ............................................................................. ~51ient Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Samp ed: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive Suite A Sample Descdpt: B1-5 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Ana yzed: 08/09/94
Attention' Tom Hol s Lab Number' 9408466-07 R..eP. orted: 08/10/94
: :::::::::::::=::::::::'::::::m:::::::::::::::::::::n:::m::n::mm::m: :m:; ~ ..'mm n m :~ n .'.
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample ReSults
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 . 150 88
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIAANALY]'ICAL - ELAP #1210
.~t~reh FiSher
Project Manager Page: 14
Sequoia 6,0Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX {415) 364-9;133
' 1900 Bate~ Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 945./0 (510) 686-9600 lAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical S.cra nto. CA 05,,4 ,./,-,600
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-5 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
' Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-07 R..eP..orted: 0..8J10/94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
, Trifluorotoluene 70 130 73
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.,
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL El_AP #1210
Ah'area~ulcher ' ·
Project Manager Page: 15
Sequoia 6*OChe...eakeD..e Redwood Cir.
1900 [~ate$ ^venue, Suite L Concord, CA 04510 {510} 686-9600 F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical ,,. s,.k~r ^ve.u~, ~.,t~, S.~..,o, C~
iil GeoResearch Glient Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94.........-"':~
iii 3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: BI-10 Received: 08/08/94
ii{ San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID . Extracted: 08/08/94
}ii Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod ' Analyzed: 08/09/94
iii Attention Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-08 Rep..orted: 0..8]..10/94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel .................... 1.0 .................... 1.6
Chromatogram Pattern:
Non Diesel Mix ........................................ C15-C23
Discrete Peak ........................................ X
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 82
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Project Manager Page:
Sequoia 6,och..,.keor,. R.dwood C,,,, C^ {4,5) ,,4-9600 fAX,4,5,
1900 Bate, Mcnu¢0 ~uit¢ L Concord, CA 94520 {510) 686-9600 lAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical ,,~s,.k.^.-,~,.~ s~c~n~o,c^ ..4 {~,.~ ~2,.9.oo
iii 3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-10 Received: 08/08/94
iii San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID ' Extracted: 08/09/94
iii Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 ' Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on Tom Ho s Lab Number 9408466-08 R.ep. orted: 0..SJ.10J..94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 89
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Andrea Fu~her
Project Manager . Page: 17
Sequoia 6,oChe.a.e.ke O,iv~ ..,,~,oo,,Ci~,, C. (~,,, .s-9~oo ~.,,,-~----
19~ Bates Avenue, Suite L Conco~, CA 94520 (510) 686-96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical ~,,~.u~,~,., ~=~.,o,~ ,.,~ ~,,~ ,,,.,~oo ~,,~,,,.o,~
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive Suite A Sample Descript: B1-15 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Ho lis Lab Number: 9408466-09 R..e.p. orted: 0..8].10Z94
· Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chrorn'atogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 99
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
An~ff'~'ea I;~u~cher
Project Manager Page: 18
Sequoia 680Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) ,64-9600 FAX (415)
I~ Bates Avenue, ~ite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical ,,,,4
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-15 Received: 08/08/94
San LEis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention Tom Ho s Lab Number: 9408466-09 ' Rep..orted: 0..8].10~94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Emit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
,~m~rea~uicher
Project Manager Page: 19
I~ Bates Avenue, Suite L Conco~, ~ 94520 (510) 686-96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-20 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/10/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hol s Lab Number: 9408466-10 R..e.p. orted: 0.8.J..1.0J..94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results'
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel .................... 1.0 .................... 10
Chromatogmm Pattern:
Non Diesel Mix ........................................ >C13
Weathered Diesel ........................................ X
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 103
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210
Project Manager Page: 20
I~ Bat~ Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94S20 (510) 686-96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical819 Striker Avenue, Suite8 Sac~mento, CA 958,4 (916) 921-9~0 F~(916) 921.01~
........................................................GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-20 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID .' Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on' Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-10 R..eP. orted: 0..8/..10/.,94
: ! i!i!!i!! i! iiliiilililiii.:l!i!iiil!iiii!i!!!."!ttl!."tltilll!illllll iiii i i Fill ! i! ii :i~ iiii
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates COntrol Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 86
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SE Q UOIA~A~IALYTICAL E LAP #1210
prOlect Manager Page: 21
Sequoia
19~ Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical
iii GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94 iii
iii 3437 Empresa Drive Suite A Sample Descript: B1-25 Received: 08/08/94 [[i
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94 iii
iii Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94 [[i
ii Attention' Tom Ho s Lab Number: 9408466-11 Rep..orted 0..8.]..10/..94 iii
:: : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: : .-' ':! :.i: ~ '.'! '~ ."i ~ .'a. .:t .:!. -3 .".":':
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 105
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIAANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
Project Manager Page: 22
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-923~1
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA. 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical,,9S,.ke.^venue. Su,,e, Sacramento, CA 958,4 (9,6) 92,-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-25 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on' Tom Hol s Lab Number: 9408466-11 R..e.p..orted: 08.].10].94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
· Trifluorotoluene 70 130 88
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection,
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL El_AP #1210
Project Manager Page: 23
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) :t64-9600 IAX (415) 364-9233
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 lAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical 8,~StmrAv .u ,$u,,e8Sacramento, CA 95834 (016) 021.9600 FAX(916) 921-0100
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-30 Received: 08/08/94
San kuis Obispo, GA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attent on: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-12 I R..e.p..orted: 0..SJ..10J..94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 92
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
P r c~j~;'t Mahager Page: 24
·3. Sequoia 6,0Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (41S) 364-~3~
19~ Bates Avenue, ~ite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
Analytical819Stfik~rAv~nue,~ite8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-96~ F~(916) 921-01~
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-30 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID ' Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-12 R..e.p. orted: 0..8./..10/..94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit SamPle Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 82
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIAANALY]'ICAL - ELAP #1210
ArC'rea F~ulcher ~
Project Manager - Page: 25
Sequoia 680Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX {415)
Analytical ,900 ,a,e. ^venue, SuiteL Co.cord,~. 94.0 . (5,0~ 6.-9~
819 Striker Avenue, Suite 8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 lAX (916) 911-0100
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-35 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
. Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod . Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-13 R..e.p. orted: 0..8./..10/..94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 ' N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 103
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA~NALYTICAL - ELAP #1210
/~rea F~lcher
Project Manager Page: 26
Sequoia 6,oChesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415} 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9233
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX ($10) 686-9689
Analytical ,,,Str, kerAve.ue,~,,e,' S.c.mcnto, CA ,,.4 ("~ '"-'~ ~(,,~,,,-0,~
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-35 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-13 R..ep..orted: 0..8.]..10]..94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 87
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
An~ea F~her
Pr6ject Manager Page: 27
Sequoia 6ao Chesapeake Orive Redwood City, CA (415} 364-9600 FAX {4'$)
I~ Bat~ Avenue, ~ite L Conco~, CA 94520 (510) 686.96~ F~ (510) 686-9689
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-40 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod AnalYZed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408~66-1~ ................... - ~.p..=ort....e..,..d..: 0.8].10]..94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel ' 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % RecoVery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 90.
Analytes reported as N,D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL El_AP #1210
~r~ect Manager Page: 28
q
Se uoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) !!64.9600 FAX (415) 1164.923:1
1.900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
^na/vncaI 8,gS,.ke. Ave.u.,S.i. 8 Sacrarnento, CA'958114 (916) 931-9600 FAX(016) 921-0100
GeoResearch Client Pro]. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-40 ' Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Holl s Lab Number: 9408466-14' Re.p. orted: 0.8.J..10/.94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 101
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210
~a~ Fulcher
Project Manager Page: 29
Sequoia 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 FAX (415) 364-9:233
1900 Bates Avenue, Suite L Concord, CA 94510 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical 8,gS,.ker^venue, S.,,e8 Sac me.,o,C^ 958,4 (9,6 9:2,-9 00
GeoResearch Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript: B1-45 Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/08/94
Analysis Method: EPA 8015 Mod Analyzed: 08/09/9.4
Attent on: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-15 R..e.p..orted: 0..8./..10~94
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg : mg/Kg
TEPH as Diesel 1.0 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
n-Pentacosane (C25) 50 150 101
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL ELAP #1210
An ra~'ea I~ulcher
Project Manager Page: 30
Sequoia. 680 Chesapeake Drive Redwood City, CA (415) 364-9600 lAX (415) 364-9233
' 1900 Bates Avenue. Suite L Concord, CA 94520 (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Analytical 819 Striker Avenue, Suit¢8 Sacramento, CA 95834 (916) 921-9600 FAX(916) 921-0100~
IIIIIIIII.~'I.~I.:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~:III~'.IIII~..IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIL:I~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~L`.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.~IIII i! !ii!ii! iiiiiitiii iii iiiiliiii."ii i i i i ~ ii itl idt iiititiii Ifil iiilill ill Itii! liiI ii t il iii iliiiiiiiiiii ii fill iii liiii iiiii iititl ifil iiiiii ii iiiii il ii!iiii!iii!iil i!!i i,iiiIiJ!':.!i!i
GeoResearch = Client Proj. ID: Unocal, 0959 Sampled: 08/02/94
:3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A Sample Descript:. B1-45. Received: 08/08/94
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Matrix: SOLID Extracted: 08/09/94
Analysis Method: 8015Mod/8020 Analyzed: 08/09/94
Attention: Tom Hollis Lab Number: 9408466-15 ...... R..op..orted: 0.8~19~94
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPPH) with BTEX
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
mg/Kg mg/Kg
TPPH as Gas ' 1.0 N.D.
Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Toluene 0.0050 N.D.
Ethyl Benzene 0.0050 N.D.
Xylenes (Total) 0.0050 N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Surrogates Control Limits % % Recovery
Trifluorotoluene 70 130 97
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL - ELAP #1210
Project Manager Page: 31
1' GEOTEST . ~
3960 Gilman Street C~Lt-~'~ ,~--~~ PROJECT O' )
~ Long Beach, CA. 90815 ~N~ 7c~__.
~ Teleph0ne:(310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF- STODY RECORD DATE PAGE -~,=.-OF
PROJECT NAME _ , METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING
ADDRESS u~ ~
S SIGNATURE .~ -- III . a,4x.¢~ z
SAMPLER' z -
PRINTED NAME o-x ~. rvX O m u~ z
CUENT PROJECT NO. 9-~GO~5'"~C-~ ~ ~ ~ [~ =~- oD
PROJECT MANAGER ~ ~ ( I ' % O ~ X ~ ~ Z
SAMPLE NO, DATE TI~E LOCATION
~ .
PR~[6 NA~ ~ TIME / P~TEb NAME' ' [ TIME PRINTED N~ TIME
PROJECT
COMMENTS
DATE
DATE ~ RECEIVED BY~ DATE ~ RECEIVED BY (LAB)
PRINTED NAME ~ TIME PRINT~ NAME TIME PRINTED NAME TIME
. GEOTEST . 'GEOTEST
Long Beach, CA. 90815 I~% (~ __C~
~ Telephone: (310) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF Y C D DATE PAGE
PROJECT NAME ~~, ~'~ ~ ~ METHODS SPECIAL HANDLING
SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE ~
PRINTED NAME ~/~ ~-~
CUE.T PROJECT ~O. ~O~~
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION
>~_~ lO~ 501
113 o ~o~
-07
~HED BY RELINQUISHED BY SAMPLE CO.OITIONS
RECEIVED ON ICE ~O
SIGNATURE CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEAL YES~
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME PROJECT COMMENTS
RE
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
COMPANY
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
a. R. KELLY December 2 1, 1 9 9 4 BAKERSFIELD. 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Bob Boust
Unocal Corporation
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400
San Ramon, CA 94583
Subject: Location : 524 Dolores Street
Bakersfield
Known as : Unocal Bulk Plant 0959
Dear Mr. Boust:
A review of the file for the property described abOve has
revealed that you are currently not in compliance with Article 11
of Chapter 16, Title 23; corrective action requirements,
underground tank regulations.
Specifically, you have not submitted a corrective action plan
(CAP) as required by section 2725(c) Article 11, Title 23 CCR.
Please submit the corrective action plan which includes all
the elements and requirements listed in section 2725 (d,e,f, & g)
within 30 days of this letter. If further work needs to be
performed before a completed CAP can be submitted then the proper
work plan detailing the additional work and including a time table
for complete compliance shall be submitted within 30 days of this
letter.
If you are unable to submit this required information then
contact this office and we shall establish a time schedule for
compliance, in accordance within section 25299.37(c), Article 4,
Chapter 6.75 California Health & Safety Code.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Material Technician
cc: Thomas J. Hollis, GeoRearch
uNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
REPORT DATE I CASE# . . ?: ~ :. :: ::~ :: [ ~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .j:?.~,~f:~F~: i~::[~ :: ~?.:::. ~, i :: ~ ~~?: ?:::?:?:?:? '~i}~[ ? :?:?~:.::~ ? ?. ~?:}~;
REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~PE~TOR ~ REGION~BOARD I COMPANY OR AGENCY NAME
ADDRESS
~RE~ C~ STA~ ZIP
ADDRESS
STRE~ C~ STA~ ~IP
ADDRESS
CROSS STREET
L~AL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NTACT PERSON PHONE
REG~N~ BOARD ' PHONE
(1) NAME QUANTI~ ~OST (~L[ONS)
(2)
UNKNOWN
DATE DIS~VERED HOWDIS~VERED~ INVENTORY~NTR~ ~' SU~URFACE MONITORING · ~ NUIS~CE CONDITIONS
DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N M~HOD usED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ~L ~AT APPLY)
~ UNKNOWN ~REMOVE CON~NTS~OLOSE TANK, REMOVE ~ REPAIR PIPING
HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ? ~ REPAIR TANK ~ CLOSE TANK & FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE
~.YES ~ NO IFYES, DA~ ~4.1 ~l / ~ ~YI+' ~REP~OETANK ~OTHER
PR~EDURE
SOURCE OF DI~HARGE CAUSE(S)
~ ~ TANK~AK. ~ UNKNOWN ~ OVERFILL ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ sPILL
~ PIPING L~K ~ OTHER. ~ ~RROSION ~ UNKNOWN ~.OTHER
m CHECK ONE ONLY
~ UNDERMINED ~ SOIL ONLY ~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER - (~HECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HA~ ACtuALLY BEEN AFFEC~D
CHECK ONE oNLY
~~ LE~NO ACTIONBEiNGTA~N~NFiRMED ~ PRELIMINARY S~ ASSESSMENT ~RKP~N SUBMI~ED ~ POLLUTION CHARAC~RI~TION
~ ~ ~ P~ELIMINARY Sl~ ASSE~MENT UNDERWAY ~ P~T CLE~UP MONITORING IN PROGRE~
~ REMEDIATION P~N ~ CASE CLOSED (CLE~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ CLE~UP
UNDERWAY
CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S)~ ~ EXCAVA~ & DISPOSE (ED)~ ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION (1~
~ ~ CAPSI~(CD) ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT(ED .' ~ ~UMP&TREATGROUNDWA~R(G~~ REP~CE SUPPLY (RS)
~< ~ ~NTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (N'A) ~ TREA~ENTATH~P(HU) ~ VENT~IL~S)
~ VACUUM EXT~CT ~E) ~ OTHER (O~
HOC ~ (~
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK)/CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
NAMEOF INDIVIDU~ FILING REPORT ' . ' . ' . ~. . PHONE )~_:.~ SIGNA~RE'/____~~__~~~..' ' '
.. ~MPANY OR ~ENCY NAME '
NAME ' ' .... ~NT~TPERSON' . ' ,' ~ PHONE. ·
ADDRESS '. ' ', '
FACILIW N~E (IF APPLICABL~ . . . ~ ~ OPERATOR " ' PHONE
ADDRES~ - : .
' ~ · ~RE~ C~ . ~U~ ZIP
CROSS STREET .... . '
L~AL AGENCY' AGENCY N~E ~NT~T PERSON. PHONE
REGION~ BOARD ' -' - ' ' . PHONE
(1) .".. ' NAME ' , ' OUANTI~ LOST (~LLONS)
, ' · ., ~ uNKNoWN
DATE DI~VERED · . ' J HOW DIS~VERED, . ~ INVENTORY ~NTR~ ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ' ~. NUIS~CE CONDITIONS
~YI4 ~'' ~ TANK:~ST ,~;. TANK REMOVAL' .' ' ~ OTHER ' ' . '
DA~ DI~HARGE BE~N
. "' ' ..' M~OD USED TO ~TOP DISC, ,ARGE ~CHECK ~L ~A ,. APPLY~ . .
~ Mi: D~' DI. 'YI ":Y~ ' ~UNKN~N' . ~REMOVE=N~NTS~CLOSETANK&REMOVE ~ REPAIR PIPING '
HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ? · ' ' ~ REPAIRTANK . ' "~ CLOSE TANK& FILL IN P~CE ~ CHiNGE PR~EDURE
SOURCE OF DI~HARGE ' · . CAUSE(S)
~. ~ .TANK mAK ' ~ UNKNOWN ~ OVERFILL ". ~' "UPmR~AILURE '~ SPILL
~ PIPINGL~K ~ OTHER' ': ' ~.~RROSION · ~ UNKNOWN ' '.~ OTHER·
CHECK ONE ONEY
~ UNDERMINED ~ SOILONLY' '~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WAfER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS HA~ AC~ALLY EEEN AFFEC~D
CHECK ONE ONLY . '. . '
~ NO ACTION TARN. ~ PR~IMINARY SI~ A~E~MENT ~RK~N SUBMI~ED ~ ~ . POLLUTION CHARAc~RI~TION
~ LE~BEING~NFIRMED. ~ ~RELIMINARYsI~ASSESSMENTUNDERWAY ~ POSTCLE~UPMONITORINGINPROGRE~
~ ' REMEDIATION P~N ~ CASE CLOSED (CLE~UP ~MPLE~O OR UNNECEssAR~;, .;- ";~ I~ OLD.uP' UNDERWAY
CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S) ~ ' EXCAVA~ & DISUSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION (1~
~ CAPSI~(cD) ' ~ EXCAVATE&TREAT{E~ . .~ PUMP&TREAT~Rou~DwA~'R(G~ REP~CESUPPLY(R~
' ~ ~NTAINMENT BARRIER (CB)' ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~' TREA~ENT AT H~P (HU)' · ~ VENT ~IL ~8)
. ~ vACuuM EXT~CT ~ ' ' ~ oTHER (O~
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY July26,'1994 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Mr. Thomas J..Hollis, Associate GeolOgist
Geo Research
3437' Empresa Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
RE: Former Unocal Bulk Plant 0959, 524 Dolores Street,
Bakersfield, 'CA
Dear Mr. Hollis,
This is to notify You that the workplan for the above stated
address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days
notice prior to the commencement of work.
Please be advised that any work done that is not performed
under direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unless
previously approved.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Technician
cc: Bob Boust, Unocal
......... GeoReSearch
3437 Empresa Dri~2e
· San Luis Obispo, Ca_lifornia 93401
· Phone: (805) 546-9100 - July 14, 1994
FAX: (805) 546-8379 ' '
Mn,Howard H. Wines ~ '~'¢~'/~'D
· Hazardous Materials TeChnician
Bakersfield Fire Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
RE: Former Unocal Bulk Plant 0959, 524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California
(GeoResearch Project 9560600500).
Dear Mr. Wines:
This lettei' present the work plan fOr a subsurface soil investigation to be conducted at the
above-referenced site. The purpose of the investigation is to evaluate the .distribution of
soil containing petroleum hydrocarbons in an area formerly occupied by underground
storage tanks (USTs). This work plan has been prepared on behalf of Unocal Corporate
Environmental Remediation .and Technology (UnocaI-CERT) and forwarded to the
Bakersfield Fire Department (BFD).upon the authorization of Mr. Bob Boust,
Environmental Engineer for Unocal-CERT. -This work plan. has been prepared in
response to the BFD letter dated June 1, 1994.
1.0 SITE BACKGROUND
On April 1, 1994, six USTs were removed frOm the site. Following UST removal, soii',
samples were collected for laboratory.analysis. Both the UST removal and sample
collection were condUcted under the supervision of Mr. Mark Turk and Mr. Howard Wines
of the-BFD. Results from the tank removal are detailed in GeoResearch's Tank Closure
and Preliminary Site Assessment Report dated April 29, 1994.
Following the UST removal, soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet below each of
the USTs. Soil in the' northwest cOrner of the UST area (Figure 1) appeared stained;
therefore, Additional excavation was completed in an effort to 'determine the limits of the
stained soil. Soil was excavated from.this area to a depth of 35 feet below ground
Surface (bgs) and a soil. sample was collected for laboratory analysis-at,.this depth.
Results of.the laboratory analysis indicate that the sample collected from apprOXimately
14 feet bgs in the 'northwest corner of the UST pit had a total extractable petroleum -
GeoResearch is a division of GEOSERVICES, A-California corporation
,- ~ ~ Mr. HOward H.-Wines
.. - : .. Bakersfield Fire'Department
-'- GeoResearch Project 956060500
July 14, 1994
-. ._ Page 2.-
hydrocarb°n (TEPH) concentration of 8;400 milligram per kilograms (mg/kg) and a total
purgeable petroleum hydrocarbon (TPPH) concentration of 6,800 mg!kg. The sample
collected from this area at 35 feet bgS had 'a TEPH concentration of 1,700 mg/kg and a
TPPH concentration of 1,000 rog/kg. Concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethy!benzene,
and total xylenes were not detected in either of these samples. According to the
laboratory, the petrOleum hydrocarbons in the samples from. this area appeared to be
weathered diesel.
Soil removed from.the northwest portion of the former UST area along with soil from the
former, waste-oil UST area was stockpiled at the site. Upon the approval of the BFD, the
remaining soil from the tank pit area and clean imported fill was used to backfill the UST
excavation. Samples were collected for laboratory analyses from the soil currently
stockpiled at the site to evaluate disposal options. Selection of a soil disposal alternative
will ..be made following completion of the investigation so that soil generated from the
boring may potentially be incorpated with the disposal of the stockpiled soil.
2.0 SOIL INVESTIGATION
The purpose of the soil investigation is to evaluate the distribution of soil containing
petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations in and around the northwest corner of the former
UST pit. The soil investigation will include drilling two borings and.collecting soil samples
from the borings for laboratory analysis. The first boring (boring B2, Figure 1) will be
drilled in the nOrthwest corner of the former UST-area. The purpose of this boring will is
to evaluate the vertical .extent of soil C°ntamination. Samples will be collected from this
boring at 10 foot intervals to a depth of 40 feet bgs. Below 40 feet bgs, samples will be
collected at 5 fo'ot intervals. This boring will. be advanced to 10 feet below the depth
where soil does not appear to contain petroleum hydrocarbons based on OVA readings,
staining, and odor or to the water table (estimated to be at 190 feet bgs), whichever is
shallower.
The seCond boring (boring B1) will be drilled north of the former UST area to evaluate the
lateral distribution of soil containing petroleum hydrocarbons. This boring will also be
advanced to 10 feet below the depth where soil does not appear to contain petroleum
hYdrocarbons based on OVA-readings, staining, and odor or to the water.table, whichever .
is shallower. Samples will be collect from this boring at five foot intervals beginning at
five fe~t bgs.
'1
:II
-~ Mr. Howard H. Wines
. BakerSfield Fire Department
GeoResearch Project 956060500
' . July 14, 1994
'~ ' ' Page 3
SamPles Collected from the boring will be analyzed by a California state Department of
Health Services-certified laboratory. These samples will be analyzed for TPPH in
accordance with EPA Method 8015 using diesel fuel as a-standard and for TEPH and
BTEX in accordance with EPA Methods 8015/8020 using gasoline as a standard.
Borings will be backfilled with a cement-bentonite slurry. Drill Cuttings will be stockpiled
on plastic and covered with plastic pending identification of appropriate disposal
alternatives.
Following drilling and laboratory analysis, results of the investigation will be documented
in a soil investigation report. This report will outline all field activities and contain a site
map showing the soil boring locations, the laboratory results and chain-of-custody
documentation, and findings and conclusions.
Drilling for the s6il investigation described above is currently scheduled for the first week
of August 1994. Thee BFD will be notified of the exact drilling date one week prior to
drilling. GeoResearch anticipates that the BFD will receive the soil investigation report
approximately five weeks following the completion of drilling.
Should you have any questions or would like to discuss the contents in this work plan in
further detail,- please contact me at (805) 546-9100. ,
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Hollis Warren Gross
Associate Geologist Associate Geologist
? C.E.G. 1528
Cc. Mr. Bob Boust, UnocaI-CERT, San Ramon ~i
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY -'
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
L "'==
WASTE-OIL B2 O
MST LOCATION
\x TOP-
~- _J LOADING
RACK
LEGEND
NORTH
0 PROPOSED BORING LOCATION 0 20 40 80
~ I
SCALE IN FEET
I I APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF MST
GeoResearch
': .............. : PROPOSED BORING LOCATIONS
: FORMER UST LOCATION UNOCAL BULK FUELINO TERUtNAL 0959
................ 524 DOLORES STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CAUFORNIA
OEORF. SEARCH PRO,JECT ~4BOB02100
DATE: 6/24/I)4 I CKD B_¥, J..n~.E .o.'.
., ,F,~ .o,. o,5,-,~ I .~I1~.~.- IO.^W. ,,~;
\
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT 1715 CHESTER AVENUE
M. R. KELLY June 1, 1 9 9 4 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
ACTING FIRE CHIEF 326-3911
Bob Boust, Environmental Engineer
Unocal CERT
P. O. Box'2390
Brea, CA 92622-2390
RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site assessment conducted
at the Unocal-Grapevine Oil Plant, 524 Dolores Street,
Bakersfield, CA (Permit ~BR-0093)
Dear Mr. Boust:
Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your
· facility, this office has determined that the extent of the
contamination plume, associated with the tanks previously located on
your property, has not been adequately defined.
This office requires (in accordance with Chapter 6.7 of the
California Health and Safety Code and Chapter 16, Title 23 of the
California Code of Regulations) that further assessment be done to
define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination plume.
Please submit a work plan for further assessment, to this office,
with in 30 days from receipt of this letter. The work plan should follow
guidelines found in: Appendix A - Reports, Tri - Regional Board Staff
Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of
Underground Tank Sites; January 22, 1991.
Additionally, be advised that oversight cost for this project will
be billed to you at a rate of $62.00 per hour.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Wines, III
Hazardous Materials Technician
HHW/Ed
cc: Carolyn A. Welsh, Gee Research
'-~ ~ ' ~.,. 0 19941
· '----'
, GOonesearch
- ~: - - May 5, 1994
3437 Empresa Drive . -
San-Luis Obispo, California'93401
Phone: (805) 546-9100
FAX: ' (_805) 546-8379
Mr. Ralph Huey
Hazardous Mat~sion
Bakers_f_ield~.E~_ Depart .ment
.. 1715~,¢h~ster Avenue -.
_ .Bal(ersfield, California 93301
RE: Unocal~ Bulk Fueling Terminal· 0959, 524 Dolores ·street, Bakersfield,
. . California; GeoResearch Project 9460602100
Dear Mr. Huey:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the'"Tank Closure and Preliminary Site Assessment
Rep. orr'' prepared by GeoResearch for the above-referenced site. The report summarizes
the activities~and results associated with the removal of the underground storage tanks
at the site. This report has been' prepared at the reqUest' of Unocal Corporate
Environmental Remediation and Technology (Unocal CERT) and forwarded to the
Bakersfield Fire Department. upon the authoriZation of Mr. Bob Boust, Environmental
Engineer fOr UnOcal CERT.~ ..
Shouid you have any 'questions regarding the site or the contents of this report, please
contact GeoResearch at. (805) 546-9100.
Sincerely,
Carolyn A. Walch
Senior Geologist _
Enc.
-/-... cc: Bob Boust, Unocal CERT
_?}- ... .... GeoResearchdsa division of GEOSERVICES,.A Ca!ifornia corporation ' '
Bakersfield Fire Dept.~ FErm~t n~
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION ,
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK pROGRAM
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SITE INFORMATION
FACILI~ NAME O~ ~ ~T~~ CROSS SmREE~ ~~ ~~
. TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~~ ~~ PHONE N~.
MAILING ADDRESS ~ ~. IM~I~ ~[I~A~ Cl~ ~ ZIP CODE ,~~
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
COMPANY~ ~~ ~~ PHONE No. ~-~-~ LICENSE No.~~
ADDRESS ~.~~ CI~A~ ZIP CODE
INSURANCE CAR~IER~~ ~~ WORKMENS COMP No. ~Q~tI~ -
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION
COMPANY~~~ PHONE N~~L~l~ ~ICENSE No.
ADDRESS ~4~ ~~ .~-. ~ ~ CI~~o~FoZIP CODE
INSURANCE C~ffRIER ~~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFOEMA~ON
COMPANY ~~ ~~~ PHONE
ADDRESS ~ ~~ ~~. CI~ ~ ZiP CODE
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~l ~
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~~~ [~~~ '
ADDRESS ~ ~ ~. CI~ ~~~ ZIP CODE
FACILI~ INDENTIFICATION NUMBER ¢~
TANK T~ANSPORTEE INFOEMA~ON
COMPANY~c~ I~~ PHONE No. ~-~-I~LICENSE No.
TAN~ DESTINATIO~ ~~
TANK INFORMATION
TANK No. .AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~i t~-~ ¢~~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WI~H THE A~ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER
STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLIED UNDER PENAL~ OF PEnUrY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
.
, ~PPLICANT NAME (PR!N~ APPLICANT SIgNAl-
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
' ;,PERMff APPUOA~ON' FOR REM'OV~ OF AN UND~GROUND S ~
T~N
COMP~~ PHONE N~:~I~ ~CENsE
I~U~NCE C~EIEE - wo~S COMe No. ~1
COMPA~ ~P- V~ ~. ~~ .' T~ PHONE No...(8053
W~TEANSPOR~R IOEN~RCATION NUMBER ~.
· T~K No. AGE VOLUME u~~ ~H~IGAL DA~S CHEMICAL
~-A ~t t~r~ ~~ STORED ,STO~ED PR~iOUSLY'.STO~ED
~AT~ L~[ ~OFEOER~
{1~ ~O~M HA~ 0EEN COMPL~TEO UNOER PENAL~ ~ P~U~, ANO TO THE BE51 ~ UY KNO~EDG~ I$1RU~ AND
KPPLICANT NAME (PR~ND "'L C
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
TELEPHONE COMMUNI CA~ I ONS''
' ATTN:
COMPANY: ~
DATE:' ~"~uzt~ PAGES TO FOLLON: ~
FROM: TOMMY 6 (805) 481 - 2552
· I'.O. l~¢,x ?~(.1
COMPANY: B & T SERVICE STATION CONTRACTORS
'P.O.' BOX 220.
Arroyo Grande+ California 93421-0220
(805) 481 - 2552
(805) 481 ' 0412 FAX
FAX (80~)
SANTA .BARBARA
P.O.
S~u~l~ B~rbar~, CA
(~) 962-5716
Ve~tura. CA 9~
BST SERU.STRTII:)N CONTR :805-48;].-041,2. MFIRt~5'~4~ 12:2:5 No.O07 P_..~02
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RE'MOVAL. O.,F: AN uNdERGROUND STORAGE TANK :
s,fl~ II~I=ORMATION . ·
TANK OWNERIOPErtATOR
MAILINe ADDRESS . '
^DDRESS
PRELIMANARY r&SSEMENT 1HFORMATION
INSURANCE C'ArTRIER '~'--~-'~L.~--~
TRaK CL~AaINa laFOeMAWO~
ADDRESS i~00 ~o~ 5L~e[
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~t~g5 ...... ~'.'~'.. - ,,
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~
FACILI~INDENTIFICATIONNUMBER ~ ~980 .8~3 [77 '
A NK ~AN'~PO~TER INFORMATIOH
oM~ANY, ~:P. ~~~ S~T~HONE N°.
TAN~ INFORMATIO~
· TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~ I~-~ ~~~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPLiC~ HAS RECENED. UNDERSTANDS. A ND WILL COMPLY WITH THE A~ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND AN? OIHER
S~AT~ L~A~ AND FEDERAE REGULATIONS.
1Ills FO~M NAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL~ ~ PENURY, AND TOTHE BES1 or MY KNOWLEDGE I$ TRUE AND CORRECT.'
~PPLICANT NAME (PRINT) APPLICANT
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT.WHEN APPROVED
BET SERO.STRTION CONTR 805-481-0412 HRR 5'94 12:24 No.O07 P.03
, . , :..,. -.~-..~ ~..~ ~'.-; ,~, ,
,' .'.'2' .. ,'.' '.~"~:~l'avl'~'z~.~.',~,,..f~: ......
.fo~lowing:..... 1, . .:!~, .:'.R.~'.':':~'"':' ~._ .~}~[.,e.'.y,s.,..~: x~:..~.'~.?=~ :~"... . , .."' -, ....
Plot
Plon
must
~how
the
· · '~ Ii' I .... rz~.~.-,~.~:.~ ,.
2..' ..~.. Ui.~I~..I.:,.,:.'= :~ '-... ' .... ': :"':'".". ~- .....
· . ' ~ ·. Z~T- .3. c l.OC6ij'~[::6f;::?a"~k~:,piping, ond clispensels ' ...;
4. Utilille~s,:'; '...'i., .... ,. ·
Woter ~ei~ (ir 'sit ) ....
',~ '-' :,.' , . 6:. ' .,on. e ',
7. any' other relevenl Infolmallon
· '"'..... ,. -.. ... ....-.,~... ~;?..~;. ~,:~:'; ,~,,-.-.::
~!.. '....'..'~ , '...:: ' 'i-'~ !! ~'-~" ~':, ' ~'~' -'"' .' ' %",'" * '" ....
· '.. ...... ," , . ' ." . '[,~ .- .. '.., .~,:'~.:i.,:;
:'~' '. ..... '~'~ .... i-i "'; ",: -"~'~ "~' ~ .: ..... ., '"'~ -'
........ , .. . ~ :..::~..
U~I ;SkKV,~IHIJ. UN L. UINIK J.U;~U::)-q~J.-UqJ. Z IqHK Z~'~ ZZ;ZO I~O.uu(
U'NDER~' ~'~ TA,NK PRO~'~M .
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RS'MOV~L OF AN uNdERGROUND STORAGE TANK
TANK OWNERIOPE~ATOR ' ~_ PHONE N6. ~ 1~-
~~ PHONE Ne. ~LIC~NSE
INSUEA~ECAEalEE ~ · WOEKMENS COMP No. ~61~
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT I~FOeMAT~ON
. COMPANY ~~~ PHONE N~~L~I~ ~ICENSE No. ~
INSURANCE CXRRIER ~~ ~~ . WORKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFORMAWON
ADDRESS 3~ ~: 5L~e~ ClW ~ ZIP CODE ~
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER J~95 ..
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ G~ ~[~~ ~C .... ' , "
FACILIWINDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~['~_ 98Q .8~3 ~77
AN K, ~A N~PORTER INFOR MATIO N
OMPANY, ~.~. ~~~. ~T~HONE N°. '(~5) 3~[L[[5~,LICENSE NO~ 6~3~06'
ADDRESS ,3~;~o:"St~eeC - CIW ~ke:sf~e]d' ZiP CODE ~
~NK
· TANK No. AGE . VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~ J~.~ ~~ STORED ,STO~ED ' PREVIOUSLY STORED
~RE APPL~C~ HAS RE~E~ED. UNDERSTANDS, A ND WILt COMPCY WITH ~NE A~.ACNED CONDIT ONS OF THIS PEEMI[ AND A~
STAT~ LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGU:ATIONS. '
Tills FO~M HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL~ ~ PENURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDG~ I$1RUE AND COaRECT.
~PPLICANT NAME (PRINT) APPLICANT S '
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMI~ WHEN APPROVED
CitY Of Bakersfield P t1177"/1
IVED B~ '
sx~s T~ Countersigned
,
· APPLICATION' FOR OF UN'~)ERGROUND ;'
PERMIT RiEMOVA, L' AN STORAGE TANK
SI?lB IN¢ORMATION
MAILING ADDRESS - - · , ' ~:CITY.
INSURANCE CAR IER .~. . WORKMENS COMP No. ~L~I~
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT IIHFORMATION
TANK CLEANING INFORMA,IION
COMPANY .~?. ,vACtrd~ ~p. JJC~a~.,.~WCF. S - Ih'C. ,, PHONE No...¢805~
ADDRESS 36,00 ~ S:~e[ _. CI~ ~ ZIP CODE
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER J~95 ,
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAl. FACILI~ G[B~ ~[~~'_ ~C,.'.". ' ~ ....
FACILI~INDENTIFICATION NUMBER . ~ ~_980 ~R3 177
~ANK,..~NSpORTER INFORMATION
COMPANY H.P. ~~~ S~~HONE No. '(~S) 3~LLZ[$[LICENSE No~, 6[3706'
ADDRESS 3~:~o:.'S~:ee~ ~ ..... " CI~ ~ke:sf~e]d' ZIP CODE
.TAN~ No. AGE VOtUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~t 1~-~ ~~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPL~C~ HAS RECEDED. UNDERSTANDS. A ND WILL COMPLY WITH tHE A~ACHED CONDITIONS ~ THIS PERMll AND A~ OTHER
STATE. LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
llllS FO~M HAS BEEN.COMPLE~EO UNDER PENAL~ ~ PENURY. AND TO THE BLS1 OF MY KNOWLEDGE I$ TRUE AND CORRECl.
~PPLICANT NAME (PRINT) 'APPLICANT' ' S
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
m~eE TANK PROe~M
ERM T APPUCAT ON FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNbE GnOUN STOnAGE TA K
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR : PHONE N& ~I~-
MAILING ADDRESS - ' ~ :..CI~ ~~t
~~ PHONE No. ~UCENSE
ADDRESS _ . _ . __, ~_~~ ap CODE ~
INSURANCE CAR IER ~ · WORKMENS COMP No. ~tt~
PRELIMANARY ~SSEMENT'INFORMATION
COMPANY~ PHONE N~~L~I~ ~ICENSE No.
ADDRESS . _ ~ ' ~ ~~oZlP CODE
INSURANCE CARRIER ~~ ~~ OEKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFORMAgON
ADDRESS .~ ~ SE~e.~ . · CI~ ~ ZIP CODE ~.
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Jt~95 , , ,
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ G~ ~[~~ ~C...'. ' '
ADDRESS ~=c~al ~ive__. CIIY ~ZlP CODE'"'
FACILI~INDENTIFICATIONNUMBER #' C~ 980 g~3 177
~AN~,~AN~PORTER INFORMATION
COMPANY H.~. ~~~. g~T~HONE N°. '(~) 3~[g[[5[LICENSE No~ 613706
ADDRESS 3~~mr :Street '~ Cl~ ~kersfield' ZiP CODE ~
· TANK No. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~t t~.~ ~~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPLiCaNT HAS REGENED. UNDENSTANDS, A ND WILL COMPLY WITH THE A~ACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMI~ AND A~ DINER
STATE LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGU[ATIONS.
TlOS FO~M HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL~ ~ PEnUrY, AND TO THE BE5~ OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AND CORRECL
~PPLICANI NAME (PRINT) APPLICANT S .
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
Service Station Contractors
Maintenance and Construction.
Li~n~ No. 623923 ·
A, B C-61/D-40 H~ma[ Cerdfi~tion
UNOCAL CORPORATION 'April 26, 1994
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite # 400 TANK DISPOSAL
San Ramon, California~ 94583
RE: FIBERGLASS TANK DISPOSAL
UNOCAL # 0959 - BULK PLANT.'
524 Delo'res Street
BakerSfield, California 93308
ATTN: FRANK PINNELL
B & T SERVICE STATION CONTRACTORS is submitting this
tank disposal letter for the (1) 550-gallon singlewall
fiberglass waste-oil storage tank'for the above referenced
facility.
The singlewall fiberglass tank was broken up into pieces
after triPle-rinsing of the tank and hauled to the
ARVIN SANITARY LANDFILL as approved bY the COUNTY OF KERN
ENVIRONHENTAL HEALTH DEPARTHENT. A copy of their approval
letter with cOnditions dated Harch 31, 1994 is attached.
A copy of the ARVIN dump ticket is also attached.
Pictures showing the tank being broken-up were also sent
to yourself for your files.
The steel tanks were disposed of'at a metal recyclor and
that disposal sh'eet is also attached.
Any questions please feel free TO CALL US @ (805) 481-2552
OR FAX US @ (805) 481-0412
Jerry Copley
Construction Superintendent
SANTA
P.O..
Santa Barbara, C;~. 93
(805)
CUSTOMER:.
~f-) ~;}~fiND(: ~' · COUNTY OF KERN
,., :'" L ,,. WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPT.
BAK~R, gFIEL. D CA 933e4 2700 "M" St., Suite 350
Bakersfield, CA 93301
L . ..... ;;,g, ' J * (805) 861-2750
G.
........ ¢, B O B T
T.'~OO,'OO ' FIB ~ ~T ~"r~ "' ~'
F'~.~I:r.~,GL.A~S iNSULATION ::,c, ¢:~, N 4. "~'~:
04/05/94 08:37 ~'805 3
~' ~ov~ .~S~C~ZON
o~n ..... · ~:~ ~o
CO~CTOR ~ ~_ ~ CO,ACT PERSON -~
TEST ~ODOLOGY ~.~,~k.~e~-, ~ ~
P~LI~Y ASSESS~ CO. CO.ACT PERSON
CO~ RECIEPT ~O~_~ ~r~.. LEL% _. ~ O~%
P~T P~
~ ........ ,~~ ~ --
. ,' ~ · ~ ~
~TION OF T~S ~ .....
CONDITION OF PIPING .,D¢...L, .._%.¢,% i ~,n~_.a~L ,~,~-.~,,,.~ :'6~'~ ~'~'~ -'
CO~ITION OP SOIL c~%~.~--~ ~ ,N~,-~. ~_~.e~{,~
CO~ENTS ~ ~.~ ~ f~ ~,~ ~,~,.~ ~ ~ .~,, .... ~_.,.~.~, ~
--, _- - - i ~ - _ /
'B ::TWINING',
ANAemiA[ CHEMI~RY, EHVIRONMENTA~ SERVICES
GEOT~HNICAL ENGINEERING. DRILLING SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION INSP~TION & MATER~L$ T~TING
April 2?, 1994 TL 994-032-01
BiT. Service Station Con=factors
Post Office Box 220
Arroyo Grande, Callforni= 93421-0220
'At=n~ Mr. Tommy Tullodge
Project= UNOCAL %0595 - BULK PLANT
524 DELOP~S, KERN & TULAR~ STK~ETS
BAKERSFIELD~ CALIFORNIA
Project %94-08
.Dear Mr. Tulledge:
This report presents the results of in-place density tests
conducted on the backfill soils and aggregate bu~ematerIals placed
in several tank removal excavations at the above referenced project
Our servi¢o~ were verbally 'author±zed' =nd directed by Mr. TO~h~y
Tulledge, a representative of BiT Service Station Contractors.
The purpose of ou~ serv£u~ was ~o determine the relative
compaction of the backfill soils and aggregate base material placed
An =he excavations £zum the removal of Several tan~s at various
locations and depths.
The tasks undertaken to. achieve th~ purpose consisted
1) obtaining verbal project specifications from ~r.
Tulledge, BIT'S representative in charge of the project;
2) °b~a£nlng various representative samples of the backfill
soils and aggregate base materials, returning the samDles
~o the laboratory and determining the max{mum dry density
and optimummois=ure content for each;
3) determining the in-place density, moisture content and
relative compaction of the backfill soils and aggregate
base materials placed at the various locations and
dept~s; and
CORPORATE OFFICE UODES!'O VISALiA 8AI(ERSF1EL[~
2527 Res~,o Sb'~ 4230 Kter~ Ave, Suite lC5 2521 E. VaJle¥ Oaks Drive ~?0~ P~us Drive. Suite 124
Presflo, CA U3Z21 MOdestO, CA ~,,~ Visalia. CA ~2~ ~fiel~. CA ~
(~) ~7021 · F~ ~7~26 (~) ~ (~) 6~1712 [~) ~
Chemist~ F~ ~37~ ;ex ~1147 ~ ~171~ ~ ~ ~
~ B&T Service Station ContractOrs TL 994-032-01
ADril 27, 1994 page 2
4) p~epa~ng this report.
Twining was not requested to. veri~y ~terial compliance.
CTD SCar ION
This .portion of the project consisted of backfill and compaction
procedures for a fuel' tank removal and a waste otl pit romoval
excavations located at 524 Delores' Street in Bakersfield,
California.
In accordance with the project specifications presented to The
TwiningLabo=atortes, Inc. by Mr. Tullodge; the backfill materlals
shall be'moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted to a
minimum of 90 porcont of the m~ximum dry density ~ d~tcrmincd by
ASTM Tes~ Method D1557-78. 'In addition, the upper two feet of
backfill mu~erial shall be compacted to. e minimum of 95 percent
relative compaction.
The tests were conducted by Twining's engineering technicians,
Mr. Roy C=mpou and ~r. Murk C~ehrlng, on Aprll 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
and ~9, 1994.
Initially, the soils were sampled and visually classified in
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The soils
were tested in the laboratory per American Society of Testing
Ma~erlais (ASTM)D1§57, MethOdS A and C, ~o determine ~he maximum
dry density and optimum mois.ture content for each representative
sample.
The depth o~ the testing was determined by personnel of B&T Service
Station Contractors, while the frequency of the testing was
determlne~ Dy t~e engineering technician based on the depth and
square footage of fill area.
The in-place density tests and moisture detez~ina=ions were
conducted with a Nuclear Moisture Density Gauge.
aPR 28 '94 13:15 TWIMiI' LABS., BFKLD P.4/i4
B&T Service Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
April 27, 1994 ' Pag~ 3
The locations and depths were determJ, ned by pacing and use of
survey grade s~akes, and should be oon~idor~d aocurate to within
5.0 feet and 0.5 feet, resp~ctlvely.
l~z~t~ of Maximum Density~.Ogtimum Moisture Determinations
(ASTMTest Me~hod D1557, Mmthod A)
Material Maximum Dry Density, optimum
sam~_le~.Lo~t~n No ........ %b~{o~t.f~- Moisture, %
Composite of 1 128.3 9.4
Native Haterial
S~mple On-sit~
Compo~iuc of 2 ~ 108.3 8.2
Import Material
S~mPled
Results of Maximu~....DgnsitY/0ptimum Moisture Determinations
(ASTH Test Metho~ D1557, ~ethod C)
~a:erlal. Maximum Dry~Densi%y, Op=imum
S_amgle Location __NO., __ _l_bs/cu.ft. Moisture, %
Composite of 3 139.0 6.2
Aggrega=e ~aserock
Sampled On-site
Results.9.~ In-P£_aqe DensitF Tests
(ASTH TeSt Method D2922/Nuclear Gauge with 12-inch Probe)
Depth
Below
Assumed Place Rela Re-
Mate- Final Dry Mois- -tire quired
Test Test rial Grade, Density, =ure, Com~, Comp.
No. Dar9 Test Location No.~ Feet ..Lbs/cu.ft. % % %
1. 04/11 Tar~k Excavation 1 12-13 117.5 6.6 91.6 90
southeast quarter
2. 04/11 Tank Excavation t 12-13 120.5 8.7 93.9 90
southwest quarter
APR F'8 '94 i:_q:15 TI.,~IHII' LABS, BFI<LD ' ' P.5/14
BaT Sezvice Station Contractors TL 994-032-01
Af~ril 2?, 1994'. ' Page 4
Depth
Below In-
Assumed Place Rela Ro-
~ate- Final Dry MOis- -tire guired
Test Test rial Oradot Donoi~y, ~ur~, Comp. Comp.
No. Date Test Location ...No, Feet Lbs/cu.ft. % % %
3. 04{11 Tank Excavation i 12-13 117.7 11.4 91.7 90
northwest quarter
4. 04'/11 Tank Excavation i 12-13 121.2 9.2 94.5 90
northeast quarter
5. 04/11 Tank Excavation i 12-13 118.4 11,3 92.3 90
.~OuthweSt quarter
7. 04/ii'Tank Excavation 1 10-11 124.7 9.1 97.2 90
.no£~hw~'~ quur~r
8. 0%/1i T~..Ex=uvution i 10-11 123.4 8.3 96.2 90
northeast quarter
· 9. 04/11 Tank Excavation 1 10-11 125.8 8.3 98.1 90
10. 04/11 Tank Excava~ion 1 10-11 121,8 8.0 94.9 90
southeast quarter
11. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 122.8' 8.9 95.7 90
southwest quarter
12. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 123.6 10.0 96.3 90
northwest guarter
13. 04/12 Tank Excavation I 8-9 122.2 10.3 95.2 90
northeast quarter
14. 04/12 Tank Excavation i 8-9 123.6 9.3 96.3 90
center
APR 28 ~94 13:15 TWIMiM LABS~ BFt{LD P.6,,'l~
B&T Service Station Con~ractors TL 994-032-01
April 27, 1994 .. Page 5
Depth
Below In-
Assumed Place Rela Re-
Mato- Final Dry Moil- -tire quirod
Test Test rial Grade, Density, ture, Comp. Comp.
No. Date Test Location No. Feek-.: T.hS.~¢u.ft. % % %
15. 04/12 Tank Excavation 1 8-9 !21.6 9.9 94.8 90
southeast quarter
16. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 4-5 106.1 4.8 98.0 90
center
17. 04/12 Tank Excavation i! 7-8 122.7 8.6 95.6 90
southwest quarter
18. 04/12 Tank Excavation '1 7-8 121.2 11.8 94.5 90
northwest quarter
19. 04/12 Tank Excavation :1 7-8 125.7 8.0 98.0 +0
~center
20. 04/1'2 Tank.EXCavation 1 7-8 122.2 11.2 95.2 90
.southeast quarter
21. .04/12 Tank Excavation 1 7-8 123.0 10.8 95.9 90
northeast quarter
22. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 3-4 101.2 8.2 93.4 90
northwest quarter
23. 04/12 waste Oil Pit 2~ 6-7 102.1 8.5 94.3 90
northwest quarter
2.4. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 107.5 4.5 99.3 90
southwest quarter
25. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 106.5 4,6 98.3 90
southeast quarter
26. 04/12 Waste Oil Pit 2 6-7 105.9 4.4 97.8 90
northeast quarter
27. 04/12 Waste 0il Pit 2 6-7 !07.5 9.1 99°3 90
center
BaT Service Station Contractor~ TL 994-032-01
ADril 27, 1994 Page 6
DeDth
-Below In-
Assumed Place ~ela Re-
Mate- Final Dry Mois- -tire quired
Test Test rial Grade, Den~ty, t~e, Comp. Comp.
No. Date'Test ~ocation No. Feet Lbs/cu.~t, % % %
28. 04/13 Was=e Oil Pit 2 2-3 103.9 5.2 95.9 90
center
29. ' 04/13 Tank ExcavatiOn ~ a-S 108;2 6.1 100.0 90
northwest quarter
30. 04/13 Ta~ Excavation 2 4-5 108.1 7.7. 100,0 90
southwest quarter
31. 04/13.'.Tank Excavatlon 2 4-~ 107.~ 6.8 99.0. 90
-center~
32. 04/~3 Tan~ Excavation 2 4-5 '104.7 5.9 97.0 90
~ou~heas~ quartor
33. 04/13 Tar~kExcavatlon 2 4-5 101.3 12.7 93.5 90
southeast quarter
34. 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 "1-2 105.2 5.6 97.1 95
southwcut qu=rter
35. 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 1-2 106.6 10.7 98.4 95
northwest quarter
36. 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 1-2 i03.6 13.1 95.7 95
37. 04/15 Tar~k E~¢mvm~£~n 2 1-2 105.6 13.1 97.5 95
southeast quarter
38, 04/13 Tank Excavation 2 1-2 106.3 12.7 98.2 95
northeast quarter
39. 04/13 Wasue Oil Pit 2 ~-2 105.1 7.8 97.0 9~
center
Station 'Contr~ctor~ TL 994-032-01
Hat~-- Finn1 D~ MOis- -=ire
40, 04/14 ~ns T~n~ 2 0-12 106.9 ~.4 98,7
Exe~va~ion
sout~t
42. 04/14 Ga~ T~ 2 0-12 106,3 7,4 98,2
4~. 04/14. Gas T~ · '2 0-12 107,4 7,5 99,2
Excavation ' '
no~heas~ ~artur ,
44. 04/14 ~ Ta~ 2 '0-12 105.1 5.4 97.0 95
EXoava ~.t on
4~. 04/15 Tank ExCavation 3 0-4 130.7 5.1 94.0' 95
no~h~s~
4~. 04/19 Retest o~ Test 3 0-4 1~4.0 3.5 96.4 95
No. 45
46, 04/~5 Tank E~va~ion 3 0-4 129.8 4.3 93.4,
46A, 04/19 R~bo~5 ~i Te~b 3 0-4 132,0 3.8 95.0
4~. 04/15. Ta~ E~ava:ion 3 0-4 129.4 5,6 93,1'
sou:ha~:
47A, '04/19 ~te~t of T~Rt 3 0-& ]32.1 g.1 95.0 95
N~. 47
APR 28 '94 13:19 TWII'~I~LRBS, BFKLD P. 1B/l~
I
Service Station Contract°rs TL 994-032-0i
Agril 27, 1994 .. Page
Depth
~10w In-
Assumed P]ae~ Rela Re-
Mate- Final Dry Mois- -tire quired
Test Test rial ~rade, Density,. tur~, Co~p. Comp.
No. Date Test Location No. Peet Lbs/cu.ft. % % %
48. 04/15 Tank Exca=at£on 3 0-4 129.5 5.? 93.2* 95
southwest quarter
48A. 04/1'9 Retest of TeSt 3 0-4 133,0 3.2 95.7 95
NO. 48
49.' 04/15 Tank Excavation 3 0-4 129.8 5.3 93.4* 95
center .
49A. 04/19 Retest of Test 3 0-4 132.5 3.6 95.3 95
NO. 49
50. 04/15 Waste Oil Pit 3 0-4 132.8 4.2 95.5 95
* N_.Q~K: Due to failing ~est results some areas were retes~ed after
additional compaction effort.
The relative comPaction of the backfill soils and aggregate base
material~ e= ~h~ !ocation~ and depths te~d, in %he excava=lo~
for the tank removals, met or exceed ~he minimum requirement as
Upper 2 feeu ................ 95 percent relative compaction
Below Upper 2 feet ......... . 90 percent relative compaction
The t~t procedures used complied with generally accepted me%hods
practiced in the industry. The data presented in this report are
pro¥id~d £or informational purposes only. The .scope of our
services did not provide for continuous observations by our
pe£~ozu~l at ~he site; thus, we cannot express an opinion as to the
B&T Service Station cOntractOrs.. TL 994-032-01
April 97, 1994 '~" Page 9
adequacy of ~he sitepreparation a~d fill compaction. We do not
undor~ake the guarantee of construction nor do we relieve =he
contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed
proj~c~ in accordance with the plans and ~fication. We claim
no responsibility or liability for damages originating from the
improper ucc of these results presented 'in accordance with
generally accepted testing principles and practices exercised in
=he City of Bakersfiold, Kern County, California, as of april 1994.
This warrant-y is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed
or implied.
project.-Should you have any questions concerning the information
THE ~WXNING ~~TOi~I'~S., INC.
Materials SuperVisor/Bakersfield Office
SAS/kin
3c~ herewith
'P~CTOR TE~T REPORT
. ~ { ' , ........
"~.i ~'!~ i i-' ~, , ~- ~ :'"
, ~ ---~ ..... ,
~ { - , { ..... . ...
' ' [ I ~I
~ ; ; , ~ -~ " r Sp.6. =
-- --', ........... { ' ,'2.7e
~ _l 'I ' [- ~ {
124 - .... ~-,, -'
N~t~P con~en~,
~Hodi~ied= Pr~tor~ A~TH ~ 1557~ ~thod R
Elev/ .... ClaSsi~iq..~t ion Hat. ~p.O. LL PI ~ > Z <
Depth ~CS ~SHTo "~is~. No. 4 No.2~
:8-12: ~M 2.70
TE~T ~U~T~ ~T~IAL ~E~CRIPTION
Op~im~ moisture = ~.4 ~ N~TIU~ HATERZ~L
Project ~.; 994-~32 Rem~ks:
Pro'~ect: ~OCAL 8R~D BY: R. C~POS
~tion: ~0~8 STREET EOC~ZOH: ON~ZTE
~~FIELD, CRLIFORHIA ~A~E ~TE: B4~11~4
~t~;, e4/1 i/~~ ,,
'PROCTOR TEST REPORT
THE TNIHZ~ ~SD~TORIES~ INC. Figure No. 1
;,,. PROCTOR T£~T REPORT
"Hodi~iad~ Proctor p ~TN ~ ~7~ He, hod ~
~pth ~8~8 R~HTO ~is~. Ho.4 No.2~
TEST RESULTS HRTER[RL ~E~R~PT~
~xim~m ~ de~it~ = 188.3 pc~ ;~RHD, Gtlt~
P~oject Ho.: ~4-8~2 Rem~ks:
Pp0j~ct: ~~ SAMP~ BY: R. CAMP08
Locati~nJ ~LORES ~T~ LOCRTIDH=
~RKE~FIELD~ CRLiFORNIR SRMPLE DRT~: 04/11/94
PR~TOR TEST REPORT
T~ ~WIHIN~ LA~RRTOR~E~ ~C, F19~pe No, ~
~ : pROCTOR TE~T REPORT
i ,
· - ,,,, :, ..
" ,,! , ! I ,.:,,I
~ep~h US~ ~ ~S~O ~ist, No.4 No.2~
TEST ~SULT8 HRTERZ~ ~ESCR[PT[~
Oeti~m ~{=tuee = 6.2 g ~RESRTE ~R$E R~K
~im~m ~V den=it~ = l~9. a
PeoJec~ Ho.: ~4-832 Remarks:
Pro~t: U~CRL SA~ SY: ~.
~RKER~FZEL~ CRLIF~NIA SR~PLE ~ATE:
PROCTOR TE~T REPORT
T~ TWIHZH~ ~R~TORZE&~ INC. Ftg~e No. ~
GOLDEN ST'ATE :METACS;iINC. DISPOSAL FO
Phone (e06) $27.3S5¢ '. ~ax (S05)'aZ~;~/4~. . ~ ~ntractor's ..... .' ~"
~ap Meals, pro~s~ & R~ng J Ll~nse N~,
I ~ntraotor .~.~ ,, ~, :
JOB ~TE:
ADDRESS:
DESTINATION: O. $, M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGE LANE . BAKERSFIELD, CA 03387
WEIGHT CERT. NO: TOTAL
EHSD PERMIT NO: ~ --
SPECTION
I~CLEAN & DRY (ACCEPT), OR
RESIDUALS PRESEN~ (REJEC~
LEL R~D~NG
~ OXYGEN CONTENT
DISPOSAL FEE
SCRAP VALUE
~ O~ER
~li fees incurred nra per load unless speGflled,
net 30 days from ~ecelpt of tank. Contra~ot's
repre~ntn n~Gepten~ of terms f~r payment,
that leak removal c~mpllan with State laws.
CONTRACTOR'9 S~'~NATUR E
T/Ht~/~I~ T TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION
CERTIFICATE
OF
CJqa'riF Y TH~:--BCEIPT~ AN~ ACCEPTANCE OF THE TANK(~)AS SPEC~Fi~D A~VE. ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIE~' WIL~ ~ COMPL~T~L Y
O
,"~'~YE~R sc~A~'RE~YOLING PURPle5 ONLY, / / [ /
W~TE-- ~n~l=~y , Y~LL~ -- ~ C~y · PiN~ -- ~t Copy
04/05/94 08:34 9805 ;:0:576::.,'':' :-_..:':,?':":/:'BFI)'tL&Z ]/AT DI]~ ' v [~003
FIRE D~F~TME~ ' . ~K~FIELD. ~01
RRE CNIEF ~Z~OUS ~TERIAL DIVISION
2130 G Stree=., Bake~sfield, ~ 9~301
..r (805) 326--3979
cERTIFICATION STATE~ OP T~ DECO~(INATION
authorized
agent
of
name
Contracting Co.
perj%lry =hat the tank(s) located at O"a~ ~/-Op_f-_{ ,g~ . a~d
b, ing r,moved under pe~i%.9 fa ~.~ Y
3
been
cleaned/decontaminated .properly and .a LEL (lower explOSiVe,limit)
reading of no greater than 5% was mea,sured i~ediately ~ollowihg
the cleaning/decontamina=ion process,
City of Ba~e3:sfiel'd
04/U5,'194 0~:35 ~0.5' .~ (1576..:.:.' ':' ':~:'-i.:<?BFD.HAZ .~..T D!Y.~
.. . ..'~ ::,:~;:.: ~:~.. :...~ ... . :' ' ~ 0
ENVIRONM'EN A ' · 'N
: F..' .~. · -.:':, -':.-~: ~,~.'.' .'.'./.'...'....,
~"-. '/:'..~ ,.~ ~ . :.-_:~L .... · ...... ' .... :'_ ::-'~ '_ '. , ~....'"" , :':.'. ~' .~-.,~ '-' . ." ":
~,.:' ' .,. S~EMcCALL~, R.E.H.S. 2?00 '~' S~,,~, s~
DiRE~OR · ~kemfield, CA' 93301
1805) 881-363~
· ' (80~ g61-3429 FAX
March 31, 1994
Jerry Copley, Superintendent
B & T Service station Contractors
P. o. Box 220
.Arroyo Grande, CA 93421-0220
SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF 550 GALLON FIBERGLASS TANK AT W.O. # 743
ARVIN SANITARY LANDFILL
Dear Mr. Copley:
Our Department has no objection to disposal of a waste oil
fibergla;s tank recently removed from 524 Dolores Street to the
Arvin Sanitary Landfill, provided the folloQing conditions are met:
1. The tank has been triple rinsed, certified clean Dy the City
of Bakersfield-Hazardous Materials Division.
2. There is no residual water or petroleum adhering to the tank
remains. '.
3. The tank has been crushed to pieces no larger than two fee
square.
4. The waste conforms to information submitted to our Department.
The Kern County Waste Management Department, as landfill operator,
reserves the right to adopt more stringent waste acceptance
criteria. Please contact Bob Neath at (805) 861-2159, to
coordinate disposal.
A waste acceptance fee of $80.00 will be invoiced at a later date.
If there are any questions, please contact'me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Steve McCall,. Director
? BY: William O'Rullian, R.E.H.$.
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Solid Waste Program
WO:WS:jg ~
~STATE'# 546 :~~ ii
' CO~ BULKWEIGHT TICK~'~ ~ ~. ": ' ':,'
' CO~ CYLINDERS ~ ·
HELIUM CYLINDERS ~ ~. -.'. ~ Cu. Ft
NITROGEN CYLINDERS -, ;' : Cu. R.
CyLS. DELIVERED .; CYLS.-R~[URNED
. · ~ TOTAL +/~:.
O WILL CALL ~R THANK YOU
~ATERIAL SAFE~ DATA SHEET
AVAILABLE ON BEOUEST RE~IT TO: P.O. BOX ~ 6~ BAKERSFIELD, CA
TITLE TO ALL ABOVE ENUMERATEO PERSONAL PROPERTY OR RENTALS SHALL REMAIN ~OLLY IN BRiO
ICE UNTIL FULLY PA{O FOR AND VENOEE SHALL BE RES~NS[BLE FOR SAME ~ILE IN HIS ~SSESSlON ~D
WILL SURRENDER SAME U~N DEMAND IF IN DEFAULT. IT IS ALSO AGREED THAT. IF COLLECTION IS MADE BY
SUiT OR OTHERWIS~, [~E AGREE TO PAY A FINANCE CHARGE OV ].~ ~ER MO~TH. WHICH IS ]8~ PER
A~. AFTER ~ 0AYS. ALSO COLLECTION COSTS ANO INCLO~ING ATTORNEY'S VETS. ANO WAIVE ALL
RIGHTS TO ANY CLAI~S EXEMPTEO UNDER STATE LAWS M~NIMOM INTEREST CHARGE $~
BASIS O~ ~HICH CYLI~OERS ARE LOANED: PROVI~EO THAT IF ANY LOANE~ CYLINOER NOT
WITHIN 30 ~AYS FROM DATE OF SHIPMENT ~H~ DISTRIBUTOR RES~V~S THE RIGHT TO MAK~ A R~NTAL
C~A~G~ OV $4.00 ~ ~YLIN~R P~ MONTH V~ ALL TIM~ ~V~ 30 OAYS THAT SUC~ CYLiNdeR IS AWAY
FROM THE DISTRIBUTOR, WHICH DEMURRAGE CHARGE THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY ON DEMAND THE
CUSTOMER SHALL PAY ~OMPTLY ON DEMAND TO THE DISfRIBUTOR ESTABLISHED VALUATIONS AND RATES
FOR LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO ANY OF SAID CYLINDERS OR FITTINGS RESULTING FROM .;.NY CAUSE AFTER
DELIVE~ THEREOF TO THE CUSTOMER AND UNTIL RETURNED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR. REFILLING OF CYLINDERS
Received By
04/05/94 08:37 ~80~.~3.26 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV~=~ ~001
,,,ACTIVITYREPORT*** ~.~
TX/RX NO. 2~'65 .
CONNECTIO~ ~ ~o4~ ~-
CONNECTION ID
START TIME 04/05 08:32
USAGE TIME
PAGES
RESULT
-. ~ FAX l~)ransmi~l
B A Ill E'R S F I E'L D COver =nee~
-. CALI~OP. NIA :' ', ' :.": '''~
Bakersfield Fire Dept.
Hazardous Materials Division
1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA ~8g01
FAX No. (8015) 32~-057~ · Bus No. (8015) 826-8~7~~
Today's Date .5'/q./q~ Time .~ :,35'- ' · No. of Pages
U'.DERG'~'~ ~~'E TANK PRO~:~M-
~ , ¥,;~ .,.~?,...'. ~ · . .. ..
·. - . .. ~.'.F~.~'~.?~.~,~. .,~ .,,.,.~,~.. ......, . .. .
PER~IT APPUCAT~O~ FOR ~'M0V~ OF A~ UNbERG~OUND STORAGE TA~K
FAC~ NAME ~ ' . C~OSS SmEE~ ~~ ~~ ... ..
M~IUNe ADD~fSS · · ~ ,..C~.
INSURANCE CAR IER~ WORKMENS COM~ No. I~l~
P~E[IMANAEV ~SSEMEN~ INFO~MA~ION
COMPANY ~~~ PHO~ N~~~ ~CENSE No,
ADD~ESS ~ ~F~ .~-. ~~ ~ C~~oZln CODE
INSURANCE C'A~RIEE ~~ ~~ WOEKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFOEMA~ON
COMPANY ,~ ~ ~,~~.' ~., ,, ' . PHONE No...(805~
~oe~ss 3~ ~= s~e.~ cl~ ~ z~P CODE
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER J~9~
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~TB~ .~~~", ~C .... - ....
ADDRESS ...~C~ ~ve_... CIIY ~ZIP"CODE '~933~'
FACILI~INDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~ C~..~O .~3 -~77 '
TANK ~N'SP_ORTER INFORMATIOH
COMPANY, ~-P. ~~~ ~[~HONE No. '(~5) 3~[~[5[LICENSE NO~ ~[~7Q6'
ADDRESS ,3~~o~ .'S~ee~ ~ ...... '. ~1~ ~ke~E~e]d' ZiP CODE
TANK tN~ORMATIOH
.TANK No. AGE VOLUME , ~ ~ ~I~HEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A ~. t~-~ ' ~e,~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
'~.~-~ 6~ ~ ~~ ~~~ " ,'
. . ~ , ~- , ...... , ....
~.~:~ ~, ~ ·, . · ,~ .....
THE APPL~C~ HAS RECEDED. UNDERSTANDS, A ND WILt COMPLY WITH THE A~ACH~D CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIt AND A~ OTHER
STATE. L~A[ AND FEDERAl REGULATIONS.
~PPLICANT NAME (PRINT) APPLICANT- SIgNAl,
THIS APPLICATION. BECOMES A PERMI~ WHEN APPROVED
L.f-..,'l ~ /
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
2101 H STREEI
FIRE DEPARTMENT
S. O. JOHNSON ,BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT 8AKERSFIELO, 93301
326-3911
FIRE CHIEF HAZARDOUS .MATERIAL DIVISION
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION
I, . 7~f~c, ~.' ~(~6F an authorized agent of / name '
~7-'\~-P~I(~ '~O~_ . ~7'~, here by attest under penalty of
Contracting Co.
perjury that the tank(s) located at ~'aq DlOp¢.~ ,¢~'--~. and
Address
being removed under permit~
has
been
cleaned/decontaminatedp.roperly and.a LEL (lower explosive limit)
reading of no greater than 5% was measured i~ediately following
the cleaning/decontamination process.
I
.... City of ~sfiel'd
CO~l DRY ICE . ......
FIRE EQUIPMENT 24 HR. PHONE: (805) 322-6001
SAFETY EQUIPMENT 101 TRUXTUN AVE. CAUF. WATTS (800) 272-6326
HYDROSTATIC TESTING
LICENSES BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 ORDER DESK FAX (805) 322-o127
OFFIC~ FAX (805) 322-6000
STATE, 6 cA. co.,. ,ED. ,.o. ,o. 0..2,04,, 0 2 27.$,
D.O,T. A 105 CO__ORS LIC. #C-16-~2078!
NAME -. ' '
ADDRESS
CITY STATE,~"' /
P.O.#. ' DATE ~' fi!' '/ ~'~
Qty. Description Pdce ,-- Amount
DRY ICE BLOCKS I-I SOLID E] CUT / J~! Lbs.
'DRY ICE PROCESS CHARGES' / '7(,)~) Lbs. ,
CO~ BULK WEIGHT TICKET # Lbs.
CO, CYLINDERS ' '} ........ ~ i Lbs.
( . ~"'- i'. c,,. n.
HELIUM CYLINDERS ~ . .c.
NITROGEN CYLINDERS := : cu. R.
CYLS. DELIVERED ,,~ CYLS. RETURNED
HYDROSTATIC TSTS
.... >:.! t ,:, "?:,... ."'
~Am O~RG E : THANK YOU TAX
D WILL CALL ~ELI~
TOTAL
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA ~HEET REMIT TO: P.O. BOX 1631 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302-1631
AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
TITLE TO ALL ABOVE ENUMERATED PERSONAL PROPERTY OR RENTALS SHALL REMAIN ~OLLY IN BRAND DRY
ICE UNTIL FULLY PAID FOR AND VENDEE ~HALL BE RES~NSIBLE FOR SAME WHILE IN HIS ~SSESSION AND
WILL SURRENDER SAME UPON DEMAND IF IN DEFAULT. IT IS ALSO AGREED THAT, IF COLLECTION IS MADE BY
SUIT OR OTHERWISE, I~E AGREE TO PAY A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.~% PER MONTH. WHICH IS 18% PER
ANNUM. A~ER ~ DAYS, ALSO COLLECTION COSTS AND INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S FEES, AND WAIVE ALL
RIGHTS TO ANY CLAIMS EXEMPTED UNDER STATE LAWS. MINIMUM INTEREST CHARGE
BASIS ON WHICH CYLINDER~ ARE LOANED: PROVIDED THAT IF ANY LOANED CYLINDER NOT RETURNED
WITHIN ~ DAYS FROM DATE OF SHIPMENT THE DISTRIBUTOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE A RENTAL
CHARGE OF $4.~ PER CYLINDER PER MONTH FOR ALL TIME OVER 30 DAYS THAT SUCH CYLINDER IS AWAY
FROM THE DISTRIBUTOR, WHICH DEMURRAGE CHARGE THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY ON DEMAND. THE
CUSTOMER SHALL PAY ~OMPTLY ON DEMAND TO THE DISTRIBUTOR ESTABLISHED VALUATIONS AND RATES
FOR LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO ANY OF SAID CYLINDERS OR FITTINGS RESULTING FROM .&NY CAUSE AFTER
DELIVEr' THEREOF TO THE CUSTOMER AND UNTIL RETURNED TO THE DISTRIBUTOR. REFILLING OF CYLINDERS
Received By ~ .
J
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
DIRECTOR ~ Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3638
(805) 861-3429 FAX
March 31, 1994
Jerry Copley, Superintendent
B & T Service Station Contractors
P. O. Boxy.220
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421-0220
SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF 550 GALLON FIBERGLASS TANK AT W.O. # 743
ARVIN SANITARY LANDFILL
Dear Mr. Copley:
oUr Department has no objection to disposal of a waste oil
fiberglass tank recently removed from 524 Dolores Street to the
Arvin SanitaryLandfill, provided the folloWing conditions are met:
1. The tank has been triple rinsed, certified clean by the city
of Bakersfield-Hazardous Materials Division.
2. There is no residual water or petroleum adhering to the tank
remains.
3. The tank has been crushed to pieces no larger than two fee
square.
4. The waste conforms to information submitted to our Department.
The Kern County Waste Management Department, as landfill operator,
reserves the right to adopt more stringent waste acceptance
criteria. Please contact Bob Neath at (805) 861-2159, to
coordinate disposal.
A waste acceptance fee of $80.00 will be invoiced at a later date.
If there are any questions, please contact me at (805) 861-3636.
'Sincerely,
Steve M~Call_~L Director.
%~~ BY: William O'Rullian, R.E.H.S.
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Solid Waste Program
WO:WS:jg· ~,
cc: Bob Neath, Waste Management Dept.
Da~e ~ Cg~ifomio --Heolth and Weffo(e ..... ~t ~ ~lth ~s
~ f~ 0959 - B~ P~ ~S~ & ~S R~'F~E f~ 15200
524 ~lores Street/Ke~ St/Tulare St
T
E
L
Y
Department of Health Service:
State of California--Health and Wellare Agency ,.
Form Approv~:J OMB No. 20,50-0039 (Expires 9-30-91 ) See Instructions on page 6. Toxic Substances Control Progran
~ase pnm o~ ~yp~. r~,, ,.uo~,~ned for use on efite ( t2;pitch typewriter). Sacramento, Calitorni¢
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS I 1.Generator's U? EPA ID No. I" Manifest Document No. II 2. P~e.1. I~ Information in the sh~x:~ed ore,sis not required by Fecle~ol
5. Transporter 1 Company Name
11. US DOT Description (t .ncJ;~!ng Proper Shipping Name. Hazard Class. and ID Number) No. Type Quonti~ Wt/Vol
< ' t ..... "~' ~' ~ ~ '"'
i 15. S~oecial Handling Instructions and Adclitionol Information
09.59 - 31vgs & (Z: CT_ ?$ 1_5200
i 16. GENERATOR'S CER11FICATION: I hereby deck, re that the contents of this consignment are fully and o'~curately described above by proper shipping r~me and ore clo~sitied.
~' POCked. marked, and ~beled. and are in oil respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable international and notional government regulations.
_~i ff I am o ~rge quantity generator. I certify that I h~e o program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I hove cleten"ninecl to be
~ economically practicable and ~ I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storc~e, or disposal cunently ovaik'~ble to me which minimizes the present and future
j threat to human he, fib and the environment; OR. if I am a .~nall quantity gener~ffor. I hove mode a good faith effort to minimize my wade generation and select the best w~ste
mor,::~ement method that is ovai~ble to me and that I con afford.
~ Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Do~ Year
-.-s)T 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receil~Of Materials Month ~ Yeor
.~ R P~nted/Typed Name Signature
-,. 18. Transporter 2 Acknowle~l~lement at ~ece-ipt of Moteriois ~onth Dc~/ Yeo~
~ R Printed/Typed N~'ne Signature
I
20, Facility Owner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous matemis c°vered bY this manifest except as ri°ted in item 19'
T Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE.
Blue: GENERATOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DHS WITHIN 30 DAYS.
DHS8022A(12/90) To: . P.O. Box 400, Sacramento. CA 95812-0400
EPA 8700--22
., . .~ .............. . . . · PERMIT No.
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR, REMOVAL-OF AN UNDERGROUND'STORAGE TANK
SIYE INFORMATION ' -
SITE.- '" .... '' ":' ' ' ADDRES~ ~~'ZlPCODE~~'" ~
FAClLIW NAME ~ ~ ¢~~. cROSS.STREET, ~~~ ~~ : ."" ~;',?
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR' ~~'.~~' 'PHONE N&
MAILIN~ ADDREsS ~_ ~"1~i~ ~,~tl~:~., . ,~ClW .... ~--.' :: "-':ZI~.CODE,~-.~~..t
:. · · ': '.' ~-:h e-~': .. -',..: "; ..... "' ', . :'.~:" :;;.:-.."~.:-'-;~.~
COMPANY ~ ~~~ ~~ PHONE No. ~-~-~' LICENSE
ADDRESS F~'~~ CIW A~ 'aP CODE::
INSURANCE CAR~IER~~ ~~ . WORKME~S coMP No. ~tt'~.
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION
COMPANY~~~ PHONE N~6~~~l~ ~ICENSE No.
ADDRESS 5 A~ ~~ .~-: ~~ ~ ClW~ ~ ~o ZIP CODE
INSURANCE C'A~RIER ~~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No,
TANK CLEANING INFORMA~ON
COMPANY. ,H.~. ,~A~ ~' S~V~S.'. ~NC. PHONE No..(fl05)_
:"ADDRESS;3b00"~o~ Street ' : , ..~. CI~ ~e~d ,ZI~'CODE.., 93308 ...
", WASTE.TRANSPORTER.IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ~9~_'.;~' _',. , ~ "'-" · <-"';-."
NAME oF'RINSTATE-D~ISpOSAL FACILI~ C~BSON ~-~0~~. ~C. "- "' "- '- ':-.;'
ADDRESS C~c~a~ ~ve CI~ ~ke~sf~d Z~P CODE..,-93308
, .~ . . . ,.., ; -. ~ ~ ,; . ,,.~ . .r. ,- ..'.,, . .
FACILI~'INDENTIF]CATIONNUMBER '~ c~,~80 fi~'3'~77"
COMPANY, H.~. ~EO~~ S~~HONE No. ;(805) ~9~5~LICENSE.No.¢f
A~DRESS ~00:~o~ S~t . _ _. c~ ~k~f~e~d- Z~P CODE. 93308 .
T~NK. DESTiNAH~N ~ ~A~ ~~- ~NC.~ 2000 ~. ~da~e ~e'~ ~ake~s~e~d 93308
" TANK INFORMATION
-TANK No, AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
~-A · ~t t~t~ ¢~~ STORED ,$TO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
,.:-::=;;:;:-:-:~-~--:.-~ ....................... :-:--:-:-.?-~--: ........................................................................................................ : ................................... : ................ ~; ............. r:-'-'-'.; ...................................... : ..................................... :; ............. 7~--------rr--~ ............... ~ ........... ~ ............. : .................
THE APPLIC6~ HAS RECEIVED. UNDERSTANDS. AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE AUACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER
STAT~ LOCA~ AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
"'" ' ' '~'""'~':'~ .... ::" ::" '":'"'"'" "':"'~;~ ..... ' '"' .................. T
THIS FO~M HAS BEE~ .C~MPL~ED;U~DER PENAL~ OF-PEnURY. AND TO THE BEST OF-MY KNOWLEDG~ IS.TRUEA~D COR,EC ....
. .._ ., . .......... ;.... , .. .... :.-'.....-:~.: ...~~:'.':.-'.~:;:' .... - '..
' '~P~OV~-/: ;': '.;-;'-'.: 4PPLICANT NAME (PRIN~ . APPLICANT. SIgNAl-
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
L)epartment oi in(3ustrlai Hela[~ons ': '::' '. ' -." '-. :: .'
Division of Occupatonel Safety & : .' . :;i.....?..!..~/r~.=..,..: .". .
ACTIV-ITY:i' NOTIFICATION, FoRM
FOR HOL-DERS'.:OF,ANNUAL PERMITS
Scaffolding: 'FalseWork ;' Trenches/ExcaVations
$ CCR 341.1(~ REQUIRES HOLDERS OF ANNUAL PERMITS TO PROVIDE NOTIFICATION TO
~E ~SH OFFICE N~REST THE pR~ECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEME~ OF ~ WORK.
THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE TO USE ~R SUCH NOTIFICATI~.
FORM MAY BE F~ED TO THE N~REST DOSH OFFICE TO COMPLY W~H THE A~. PL~SE ~ NOT
MAIL DUPLICATE NOTIFICATION TO FOLLOW-UP FAX NOTIFICATION,
FAX DATA: F~EDTO OS~ DIS~I~ 0~I~ - ~FI~,D ~HD~T~E~ Stoc~ale Hi.ay
~SH F~ NO. ( 805 ) 395 - 2841 ~ ~ ~ ~'~-~O~
~pany Na~: B & T S~VTCE STATTON ~A~RS Reid Phone: ~
~nual Permit Numar: ~J 557584 ~i~ P~: (805) ~1- 2552
issuing R~ion: ~ 4 issuing Distri~: ~J 5 - Ve~tura
Spedfic A~ivity L~ation: 524 ~e]ores Street/Ke~/Tulare S~umber of Employees: . _
Nearest Major Cross Street: Sta~ing Date: ~rch 28, ~994
city: B~ersfield Anticipat~ Completion Date:
County: Ke~ ~ty High Voltage Unes in Proximi~? No ~ Yes__
INSTRUCTIONS: The appropriate item(s) mus~ be ~mpleted and signed by a ~r~n kno~geable a~t the proje~ for each
a~iM~ ~vered by a ~rmit. Please fill in or ~k off t~ blanks ~ere appropriate.
~caffolding: Height Metal Wood__ Wood over ~ Feet Metal o~r 125 Feet
Metal>125 F~t or Wood>60 Feet requires design by California R~istered Civil Engine~ & Plans at Site.(~e 8 CCR 1~4(c)(7))
Description:
Falsework/Vertical Shoring: Maximum Height ' Maximum Span Material
Description:
(See 8 CCR 1717)
Trenches/Excavations: Depth Range(Min/Max)' 3'/15' Width Range(Min/Max)32'/45' Total Length, 70'
Ground Protection Method: Shorinq Sloping ~f)O~ Trench Shield, Professional Engineer
Underground Services Alert(USA)Number ~/~ 90806 (NORTH 1~800-642-2444/SOUTH 1.800-422-4133)
Soil Analysis to be done? Yes No, XXX If No, You Must Slope 1.5 to 1,
Competent Person: The holder.of an Annual Permit who is notifying the Distrtict of the commencement of a Trench and/or
Excavation project shall designate a competent person in accordance with the requirements of 8 CCR
Section 1504, 1541, and 1541.1.
BACt~TLL & C_D[~AC~ ]D(CAVATION W[~-[ COM~AC~ION ~_.sTs.
Ground protection methods for excavations deeper than 20 feet must be designed by a Registered Professional Engineer.
See 8 CCR 1541.1. Appendix F.
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the above information and assertions are true and correct and that I/the applicant
have knowledge of~l will comply with__ _ .the~reg°ing'- ..............
S~nature:
Title: I:~O~CT COORDIN~iTOR/ Date: March 25, 1994
Form C-tO/g.',
DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH - DISTRICT OFFICES
DISTRICT ADDRESS TEL. HO. FAX NO.
Anaheim 2100 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 140, Anaheim 92806 (714) 939-0145 (714) 939-861 ~
BaKersfield 4800 Stockdale Hwy, Suite 212, Bakersfield 93309 (805) 395-2718 (805) 395-284~
Concord 1465 Enea Circle, Bldg.E., Suite 900, Concord 94520 (510) 676.5333 (510) 676-0227
Covina 1123 South Parl<view, Suite 100, Covina 91724 {818) 966-1166 (818) 966-7041
Fresno 2550 Mariposa St., Room 4000, Fresno 93721 (209) 4z.5-5302 (209) ~45-578~
Los Angeles 3550 W. Sixth St., Room 431. Los Angeles 90020 (213) 736-3041 (213) 736-4526
Oakland 7700 Edgewater Drive, Suite 125, Oaklanci 94621 (510) 568-8602 (510) 568-7092
Pico Rivera 9455 E. Slauson Ave.,Pico Rivera 90660 (310) 949-7827 (310) 949-9860
Redding 381 Hemsted, Reck:ling 96002 (916) 224-4743 (916) 224.4747
Sacramento 2424 Azclen Way, Suite 165, Sacramento 95825 (916) 263-2800 (916) 263-2796
San Bemardino 242 E: Airport Drive, Suite 103, San Bemardino 92408' (909) 383-4321 (909) 383-6789
San Diego 7807 Convoy Court, Suite 140, San Diego 92111 (619) 237-7325 (619) 279.4658
San Francisco 1390 Manet St., Suite 718, San Francisco 94102 (41 5) 557-1677 (415) 557-3020
San Jose 2010 N. First St..Suite 401, San Jose 95131 (408) 452.7288 (408) 452-7287
San Mateo 1.900 So. Nodolk Street, Suite 215, San Mateo 94403 (415) 573-3812 (415) 5'73-3817
Santa Rosa 1221 Farmers Lane, Suite 300, Santa Rosa 95405 (707) 576-2388 (707) 576-2598
Ton'ance 680 K~ox Street, Suite 100, Ton'ance 90502 (310) 516-3734 (310) 5164253
Van Nuys 8150 Van Nuy~ Blvd.. S~iIo 405. Van Nuys 91401-3379 (618) g01-5403 (818) 901.5578
' Vantura 1655 Meea V~, Room 150, Ventura 93003 (805) ~1 (a05) 654-4852
March 4, 1994
3437"Empresa.Drive ........... . - _ . .
:-San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Phone: (805) 546-9100
FAX: (805) 546-8379 ' -
RECEIVED
Url .Ralph Huey' ~,~ D 7 1994
-- ~ Hazardous .Materials Division
.Bakersfield Fire Department HAZ. MAT. DIV.
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
RE: GeoResearch Sampling Procedures
. Dear Mr. HueY: ._ -.
Enclosed please find a-copy of GeoResearch'S standard procedures for soil sampling
following the remOval of underground storage tanks (USTs). These sampling procedures
are submitted for review as required by the Bakersfield Fire Department's "Conditions for
, Abandonment of Underground Storage Tanks." These general procedures and sampling
.. techniques will be used by GeoResearch personnel on site dUring the removal of USTs
.- from the Unocal Bulk Terminal at 524 Dolores Street, Bakersfield, California.
r '~ Should you have any 'questions, or require additional information regarding
- GeoResearch's onsite activities,, please call me at (805) 546-9100.
Sincerely,
Carolyn A. Walch
Senior Geologist
Enc.
GeoResearch is a division of GEOSERVICES, A California corporation _.,, '
_'
I-
' ,. ~7~'~,. ',-.,,~'..
GEORESEARCH .~. :. : . ...,::
-.' .'~:"'i ':' ":'-2 ..
/ METHODS AND PROCEDURE~:FOR.. ;-';' ,'
SOIL SAMPLING DURING UNDERGROUND ST0~GE:~ANK REMOVAL
,/ - ....::!? "
The following practices are followed by GeoResearch personnel during soil sampling
following the removal of underground storage tanks (USTs). These sampling and :"
analytical methods and quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures are /,~' ,,
established to comply with the requirements of the Bakersfield Fire Department for UST
sites within their jurisdiction.
1. Following removal of USTs, GeoResearch will coordinate sampling efforts with the
onsite representative of the Bakersfield Fire Department and will direct the
excavation by backhoe of soil beneath the former USTs. Soil beneath each former
UST will be excavated to the specified depth for sampling. Typically, soil is
excavated so that samples' can be collected at two feet and six feet below the
.bottom of the former UST. The number of samples collected from beneath each
former UST, and any removed piping and dispensers will be based on the
following table and in accordance with Bakersfield Fire Department requirements:
NO. OF SAMPLE SAMPLE
USTS SAMPLES DEPTHS LOCATIONS
(feet below
UST bottom)
Less than 1,000 2 2 Beneath center of
gallon capacity 6 UST
1,000 to 10,000 4 2 One-third UST length
gallon capacity 6 from each end of
UST
Greater than 10,000 6 2 One-fourth UST
gallon capacity 6 length from each end
and from center of
UST
DISPENSERS 2 2 Beneath each
6 dispenser
PIPING Variable 2 Every 15 feet and
6 beneath connections,
bends and joints, as
required
GeoResearch Procedures For Soil Sampling
Page 2
2. Samples collected using a backhoe are collected from the center of the bucket to
avoid cross contamination with the residual soil on the bucket teeth or edges.
3. Samples are collected by inserting a clean brass or stainless steel rings or a clean
glass jar into the soil in the bucket. If a ring is used, the ends of the ring are
capped with teflon discs and plastic caps and sealed with duct tape. If jars are
used, each jar is capped with a tight-fitting lid lined with teflon.
4. The sample container is completely filled, as possible, to avoid leaving headspace.
5. If a trowel or similar tool is used to collect samples, this tool is washed prior to
collecting each sample using a non-phosphate detergent and rinsed in distilled
water.
6. Sample splits and duplicates, and background samples, will be collected as
required by the Bakersfield Fire Department.
7. Each sample is labeled with the time and date of collection, sample number,
sample location, type of analysis and sampler's initials. Each sample number is
discreet and includes the depth below ground surface or below the tank pit bottom
that the sample was collected. The sample is placed in a cooler maintained at
approximately 4 degrees Centigrade while awaiting transport to a California-
certified hazardous waste laboratory.
8. The sample information is recorded on a Chain-of-Custody document that will
accompany the sample to the laboratory.
9. Samples will be transported to the specified laboratory within a time frame
sufficient to permit the required analyses to be completed within the holding time
prescribed for the analyses to be performed.
10. The laboratory analyses to be performed for each sample will be consistent with
the contents or suspected contents of the UST beneath which the sample was
Collected. All laboratory analyses will be conducted in accordance with the
appropriate California Department of Health Services or Environmental Protection
Agency methods.
AN ESOP C01VIPANY
-ROBERT LEE .&..ASSOCIATES, INC.
ARCHITECTURE ' ENGINEERING ' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
I fl 37 NORTH McD0WELL BOULEVARD - PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 94954-1489 (707) .765-166O
Mailing Add~eaS: P.O. Box 750908, Petaluma, CA B4975-OBO8 -.' Fax (707) 765-9908
JOHN W. JOI~HS~N
Architect
Architect Bakersfield Fire Department
SX£VEn J. ~<AT'rnen Hazardous Materials Division
Arch!tect Underground Storage Tank Program
cEc,- ,~. 8,;EncE~ - 2101 "H Street
Architect
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Civil Engineer
RE: UNOCAL Bulk Plant//0959
524 Dolores Street
Bakersfield, California
RHL JOB #1427.30
To whom it may concern:
On behalf of UNOCAL Corporation, we would like to make application for a permit
to remove the underground storage tanks located at the above mentioned facility.'
These tanks include one 10,000 gallon and five 20,000 gallon prOduct tanks and one '
550 gallon waste 0il tank.
.Please find enclosed an application to remove underground hazardous' materials
storage tanks, .state A & B forms, a site Plan and a check for $3381.00 to cOver the ·
permit fees. ' '
If you have any qUestions or comments please don't heSitate to call me.
Very truly yours,
ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Bob McCormick
' Job caPtain
cc:. Mr. Frank Pinnell - F.S.E./UNOCAL Corporation
~ MARIE'I'~_A, GA SACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA ~ ~ ' LA HABRA, CA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD~'
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A
COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITy/SITE
[] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION
MARK
ONEITEM ~ 2 IN.RIM PERMIT ~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT ~ 6'~M~RARY SITE CLOSURE
ONLY
I. FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED)
ADDRESS ' ' NEAREST CROSS STREET P~CEL ~ (O~NAL)
CI~ NAME STA~ ZIP CODE SITE PHONE ~ WI~ AREA CODE
~~~ CA
TOIN~CATE COR~RATION ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ P~TN~RSHIP. ~ LOCAL-AG~CY · ~ COU~Y-AG~NCY ~ STATE-AGENCY ~ F~E~L-AG~Y
DISTRICTS
EMERGENCY ~ONTA~ PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY OONTACT PERSON (SEOONDARY)- optional
II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ~ (MUST aE COMPLETED)
NAME / CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION
UAILING OR STREET ADDRESS ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ L~AL-A~ENCY ~ STAT~-AG~NCY
~ ~T I~~~ '~~ ~ COR*R,TION ~ P*T.ERS.IP ~ COU~-AGE<Y ~ FEDE*L-AGE*Y
CI~~NAME STATE~ Z~ [
III, TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME~~OF OWNER ~~~[~ I CARE OF ADDRESS iNFORMATION
MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS / ~ ~x ~ i~ate ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ L~AL-AG~CY ~ STA~-AGENCY
~ ~ [~~~ ~R~ / ~ COR*RA~ON ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ COU~-AGE<Y ~ F~E~L*GE<Y
Ci~ NAME ~ STATE I ZiP CODE PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE .
IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise.
V. PETROLEUM UST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED
~ 5 LE~EROFCREDIT ~ 6 ~EMP~ON ~ ~ OTHER
VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notificaion and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked.
' THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UN~ALTY OF PERJUR~, AND TO THE BEST ~ MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
LOCALA~EhCYUSEbNLY /'/ ~ ~
COUN~ ~ JURISDICTION ~ FACILI~
CENSUS TRACT · OPTIONAL --. OPTIONAL ~ --
LOCATION CODE - OPTIONAL. - SUPVISOR - DISTRICT CODE
THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BYAT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION · FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SEE INFORMATION ONLY.
FOR~3A-5
FORM A (5-9t) ·
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY [] I NEW PE~RMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SiTE
ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [] 8 TANK REMOVED
DBAOR FACIUTY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: O~ ~;:~'- ~.~i~ ~
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEUS -- SPECifY ~ UNKNOWN
II. TANK CONTRAS ~A-~ is MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
UNLEADED ~ 5
. JET FUEL
~ 3 CHEMIOAL PRODUOT ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 2 WASTE ~ 2 LEADED ~ 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW~
D. IF (A.1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C, A. S. ¢:
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, AND C, AND ALL THAT APPLIES IN BOX D AND E
A. ~PE OF ~ 1 DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ 2 SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK} ~ 99 OTHER
B. TANK ~ ~ ~*RESTEEL ~ 2 ST*~NL~SS STEEL ~ 3 F~E.GL*SS ~ 4 STE~LCL*~ W/F~S~RGL*SS
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ALUMINUM ~ 8 10~/o METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
(Pri~aryTa~k) '~ 9 BRONZE ~ 10 GALVANIZED STEEL ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
~ 1 RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD LINING ~ 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERIOR ~ 5 G~SS ~INING ~ 6 UNLINED ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
LINING '
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% ME~ANOL ? YES__ NO__
D. CORROSION ~ ~ POLYE~YLENE WRAP ~' 2 COATING ~ 3 V,NYL WRAP ~ 4 F~BERGLASS RE~NFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHOD~CPROTECTION ~ 9~ NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT tNSTALLED,~EAR)
IV. PIP'lNG INFORMATION C~RCLE A I~ABOVEGROUNDO~ U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLtCABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE A U I SUCTION A~ 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVI~ A U 99 OTHER
A~I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
B.
CONSTRUCTION
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE
CORROSt0N. A U 5 ALUMINUM A'U 6 CONCRETE ; 'A U 7 STEEL W/COATING A ~ 8 10~/~ METHANOL'COMRATISLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIO PROTECTION A~5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
.
D.' LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING 3 INTERSTITIAL
MONEORING ~ 99 OTHER
V, TANK LEAK DETECTION
6 TANK TESTING ~ 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING ~ 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GALLONS INERT MATER~AL ?
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL~ OF PERJURY, A~HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
XPPLICAN~SNAME~~~~ /~~~---- } DATE '
LOCAL AG ENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D, NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
COUNTY # JURISDICTION ¢ FACILI~ ~ TANK ¢
STATE I.D.¢ ~' Iit
PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED ~Y/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM a (7-9~) THIS FOR~ MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERLE APPLICATION- FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM & HAS BEE~ FILED.
FORO~B-R5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 R~'NEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF ~NFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [~ 8 TANK REMOVED
DBAOR FAO,L,TY.AMEW.ERETA.K,S,.STAL'E =
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEUS -- S~EC~Y ,~ UNKNOWN
II.TANK CONTRAS ,~ A-~ ,S UA,KED. COMPLET~ ~T~U C.
UNL~*D~
~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 2 WASTE ~ 2 LEADED ~ 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW)
D. IF IA.l) IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. ~:
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ~NE ITEM'ONLY IN BOXES A, B, AND C. AND ALL THAT APPLIES IN BOX D AND E
A. TYPEOF ~ 1 DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~'2 SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) ~ 99 OTHER
B. TANK' ~ I BARE STEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 F. IBERGLASS ~ 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ALUMINUM ~ 8 lOm/~ METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
(PEimaryTank) ~ 9 BRONZE ~ 10 GALVANIZED STEEL ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
~ 1' RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD UN[NG ~ 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C, INTERIOR ~ 5 GLASS LINING ~ 6 UNLINED ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ gg O~ER
LINING
)8 LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__
D. CORROSION ~ 1 POLYE~YLENE WRAP ~ 2 COATING ~ 3 VINYL WRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTEOTION ~ gl NONE ~ g5 UNKNOWN ~ gg OTHER
E. 8PILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EoumPUENT INSTALLED ~EAR)
IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION A~2 PRESSURE ~ U 3 GRAVI~ A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A~ 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U'3 LINED TRENCH ~ U g5 UNKNOWN ~ U 99 OTHER
C, ~ATERIALAND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U. 6 CONCRETE A U'7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 10~/~ METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A~5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC L[NE LEAK DETECTOR ~2 LINE TIGHTNESS TEST[NG ~ 3 INTERSTITIAL
MON~ORING ~ 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
6 TANK TESTING ~ 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING ~ 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
I 1. ESTIMATED DATE'LAST USED (MO/DAY~R) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTI~ OF 3. WAS TANK FILLED WITH YES ~
~_ ~ SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GALLONS INERT MATERIAL ? '
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL ~ OF PERJUR~O THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
(PRINTED & SIGNATURE) ~ · ~ · ' DATE
LOCAL AG ENCY USE ONLY THE STATE LD, NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE F~R NUMBERS BELOW
) COUNTY N JURISDICTION N FACILI~ N TANK
PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/OATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM'A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
FORO~B-~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY [] i NE~V PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [~ 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
ONE ITEM · [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~ $ TANK REMOVED
NAME WHERE TA.K ,S ..STALLED;
DBA
OR
FACILITY
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ~TEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
I1. TANK CONTENTS ~FA.~ iS MARKED. COMPLETEITEM C.
A. ~ 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL []' 40]L B. C. [] la REGULAR [] 3 DIESEL ~ 6 AVIATION GAS
UNLEADED
~ 2 PETROLEUM [~ 80 EMPTY [~ 1 PRODUCT [~ lb PREMIUM [] 4 GASAHOL ~ 7 METHANOL
UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL
[~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UN~<NOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B,'ANDC, ANDALLTHATAISPLIESINBOXDANDE
A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM [~ 2 SIN~LE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED'TANK) [] 99 OTHER
B. TANK i~ 1 BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS'STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS R~INFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
(PrimaryTarlk), [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL r~ 95 UNKNOWN [].. 99 OTHER
[] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINmNG [] 3 EPOXY LmNING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERI'OR [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED ,~ 95 UNKNOWN '[] 9g OTHER
LINING.
IS LINI.NG MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__
D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
E, SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED O~EAR)
IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE. A U I SUCTION A(~2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 10(7'/o METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GA~.VANIZED STEEL 'A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A(~)95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LiNE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 iNTERSTITIAL
MONITORING [] 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~'~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MCNITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING
~ 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
I ' I. ESTIMATED DATE LAST~,~E~AY/YR) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF 3. WAS TANK FILLED WITH YES[] NO~
, SUBSTANCE REMAINING j~ GALLONS INERT MATERIAL ? .
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY~ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
LOCAL AG ENOY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK #
PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CL,OSED ON SITE
ONEITEM [~ 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE [~ 8 TANK REMOVED
DBA O, FAC UTY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: E;U t .
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPEClF, Y IF UNKNOWN
II. TANK CONTENTS IF A.1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C,
UNLEADED 4 GASAHOL
A. MOTOR VEH,CL FUEL [] O,L B. C.[] REGUL R D,ESEL [] AV,AT,ONG S,
~ PETROLEU~ [] ~0 EMPT~ . [~ ~ PRODUCT [] ~PREMiUM
UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL
~ 3 CHEMiCAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN ~ 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRBE N TEM D. BELOW_)
D. IF(AA)ISNOTMARKED. ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S.#:
II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK oNE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE
A. TYPEOF' [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM [~ 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) . [] 99 OTHER
B. TANK [~ 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALuMINuM [] 8 IO(Y'/o METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
(PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
~ I RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERIOR ~ 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
LINING
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__
D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ~T95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR)
IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A(~2 PRESSURE A U, 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION Ai~l SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM .A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING ,~ U 8 100°/o METHANOL COMPATI~LEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A i~5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LiNE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL
MONITORING [] gg OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING ~ 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AN~T/O'"I'HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
~ IA. u:=~'.. ~ F-~::~..'~.4~, ~///// ~'-,a~v/
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TA~K #
PERMIT NUMBER I PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM a (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION, FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY ~ 1 NERN PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [----] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION E~] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE J~ 8 TANK REMOVED
DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS I,STALLED:'~ ,~j~l~.. ~ ~'{~--.-)~
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOt'
II, TANK CONTRAS IFA-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
~ 2 PETROLEUM g 80 EMP~ ~ 1 P'"ODUCT ~ lb PREUlUU
., . UNLEADED ~ 5 J~TFUEL
~ 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 2 WASTE ~ 2 LEADED ~ 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW
D. IF (A.1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED ~~ C.A.S.
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, ~, AND C, AND ALL THAT APPLIES IN BOX D AND E
A. ~PEOF ~ 100UBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WALL WITH E~ERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ 2 sINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TAN~ ~ 99 OTHER
B. TANK ~ I ~ARESTEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 FIBERGLASS ~ 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIO
MATERIAL~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ALUMINUM ~ 8 10~/. METHANOL OOMPATIBLE W/FRP
(PrimaryTank) ~ g BRONZE ~ 10 GALVANIZED STEEL ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
~ 1 RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD LINING . ~ 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING
C. INTERIOR ~ 5 GLASS LINING ~ 6 UNLINED ~ g5 UNKNOWN ~ g9 OTHER
LINING
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 1~, METHANOL ? YES ~ NO~
D. CORROSION ~ ~ POLYETHYLENE WRAP ~ 2 COATING ~ 3 VINYL WRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIO PROTECTION ~ 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 O~ER
E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ~EAR)
IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~.CLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A ~ PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVI~ A U gg OTHER.
B. CONSTRUCTION A~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH ~ U 95 UNKNOWN A U g9 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U~ 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U, 8 1~/. METHANOL COMPATIBLEWIFRP
PHOTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION ~ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING ~ 3 INTERSTITIAL
MONDORING ~ 9g OTHER
V. TANK LEAK.DETECTION
~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIAT. ION ~3 VADOZE MONITORING ~4 AUTOMATIC TANK ~UGING ~ 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING
~ 6 TANK TESTING ~ 7 INTERSTITIAL~ONITORING ~ 91' NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 9g OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
1, ESTIMATED DATE LAST USED (MO/D~Y~R) ' 2. ESTIUATEO QUANTI~ OF/~ 3. WAS TANK FILLED WITH YES
~.~ SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GALLONS INERT MATERIAL ?
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL ~ OF PERJURY~~HE BEST~ KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
(PRINTED & SIGNATURE) [ ~ ~
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OFTHE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW - ·
COUNTY ~ JURISDICTION ~ FACILI~ ~ TANK ~
PERMIT NUMBER PER~IT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
fORM B (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PEHM~ APPLICATION- FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
· STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [~ 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT ~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~. 8 TANK REMOVED
I. TANK DESCRIPTION CO=PLaTE ALL ,TE~S -- SP~CIFY ~F UN~OWN
II. TANK CONTE~S ~ A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
A. 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL ~ 4 OIL B. C. ~ l aREGULAR ~ 3 DIESEL ~ 6 AVIATION GAS
UNLEADED
~ 2 PETROLEUM ~ 80 EMP~ ~ 1 PRODUCT ~ lb PREMIUM ~ 4 GASAHOL ~ 7 METHANOL
UNLEADED ~ 5 JET FUEL
~ 3 C~U~C*L.RO~UCT ~ ~5 UMW.OW. ~ 2 W*STE ~ 2 L~*D~D ~ ~ OTU~R (DESC.~ ~ ~TEU O. ~ELOW)
D. ~ (A.~)~S NOT MARKED, ENTER 'NAME O~ S~STANCE STO.ED C.A.
II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A. B. AND C, AND ALL THAT APPLIES IN BOX D AND E
A. TYPEOF ~ '1 DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WALL WiTH EXTERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ 2 SINGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) ~ 99 OTHER
· ~ 1 BARE STEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 FIBERGLASS ~ 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
B. TANK
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ALUMINUM ~ e ~Om/~ METHANOL COMPAT~BLEW/FRP
(PrimaryTahk) ~ 9 BRONZE ~ i0 GALVkNIZED STEEL ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ ~9 OTHER
~ 1 .UBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD LiNiNG ~ 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOL,C LINING
C. INTERIOR
LINING ~ 5 GLASS LINING 6 UNLINED ~ g5 UNKNOWN ~
IS LINING UATERiAL COUPATISLE WITH 1~% UETHANOL ? YES__ NO__
D. CORROSION ~ 1 POLYE~YLENE WRAP '~ 2 COATING ~ 3 VINYL WRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REiNFOrCED PLASTIC
PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTiON ~ 91 NONE ~ gS UNKNOWN ~ gg OTHER
E~ SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ~EAR)
IV, PIPING INFORMATION , C~RCLE A )F ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND. BO~ IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION A~2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVI~ A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A ~ 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A .U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE
CORROSION~ A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COAT)NG A U 8 10~/~ METHANOL COMPAT)BLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U 9 GAEVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A ~5 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~ 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING ~ 3 INTERSTITIAL
MONffOR)NG ~ 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCiLiATION ~ 3 VADOZE MONITORING ~ 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING ~ 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING
~ 6 TANK TESTING~ 7 INTERST)TIALMONITOR[NG ~ 91 NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 O~ER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
] 1. ESTIMATED DATE LAST USED (MO/DAY~R) 2. ESTIMATED QUANTI~ OF 3. WAS TANK FiLLED WITH YES ~
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL ~ OF PERJURy, A~O~E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER IS COMPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
m
COUNTY ~ JURISDICTION ~ FACILITY ~ TANK
STATE I.D.~ ~ ~
PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (7-91} THIS FORM MUST BE ACCO~PANIEB BY A PERM~ APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ·
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
MARKONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~, 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ONSITE
ONE ITEM [] '2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE~ 8 TANK REMOVED
DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: d~,~ ~:~'* ~==~'-*~"
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL iTEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
.. ~ ~NKCONTE~S ,~A.~ iSMARKED, COMPLETEITEMC.
A. ~ 1 MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL ~4 OIL B. C. ~ l aREGULAR ~ 3 DIESEL ~ 6 AVlATION GAS
~ 2 PETROLEUM ~ 80 EMP~ ~ 1 PRODUCT ~ lb PREMIUMuNLEADED ~ 5 JET FUEL ~ 7 METHANOL
~ 3 CHEMIOALPRODUOT' ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 2 WASTE I ~ 2 LEADED ~ 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. ~LOW)i
Ilk TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE
A. ~PE OF ~ 1 DOUBLE WALL ~ 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN
SYSTEM ~ 2 StNGLE WALL ~ 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) ~ 99 OTHER
B. TANK ~ 1 BARE STEEL ~ 2 STAINLESS STEEL ~ 3 FIBERGLASS ~ 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ~ 7 ALUMINUM ~ 8 10~/~ METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP
(PrimaryTank) ~ 9 BRONZE ~ 10 GALVANIZED STEEL ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
~ 1 RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD LINING ~' 3 EPO~ LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING
c. I~TER~O~ ~ s GLASS L~N~,e ~ ~ UNU.ED ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OT~R
LINING
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES ~ NO~
D. CORROSlO~ ~ ~ POLVET~VLEN~ WRAP ~ 2 COATING ~ ~ WNYL W,AP ~ 4 ~aE,6LASS ,E~NFORCED PLASTIC
-'PROTECTION ~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECT~ON ~ 9~ NONE ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
E; SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT iNSTALLED CEAR)
IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A ~AeOV~GROU~DOR U ~FUNDERGROUND. eOTH~FAPPUCAeLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A~ GRAVI~ A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A~ SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE
CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 10~. METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
PROTE~ION A U 9 G~LVANIZEO STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A ~ 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ ~ AUTOMAT~OL[NELEAKOETECTOR ~ 2 UNETIGHTNESSTEST[NG ~ 3 INTERSTITIAL
UON¢OR~Ne ~ 99 OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
~ 6 TANK CESTING ~ 7 tNTERSTITtALMONITORING ~ 91 NONE . ~ 95 UNKNOWN ~ 99 OTHER
VI, TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION
, ~.~ . SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GAELONS INERT MATERIAL ?
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENAL~ OF PERJUR~N~ TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
THE FO~UMBERS BELOW
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER ~s COMPOSED ~F ~
COUNTY ¢ JURISDICTION ¢ FACILITY
PERMIT NUMBER ¢ PERMIT APPROVED aY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (7-91) THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
Bakersfield Fire DePt.~ PERM,T
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM .
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SITE INFORMATION -
FACILI~ NAME U~ ~ F~T~~ CROSS STREET ~~ ~~
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~~ ~~ PHONE N~.
MAILING ADDRESS ~ ~. [~1~ ~~ Cl~ ~'ZIP'CODE
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
COMPANY~ ~[~~ ~~ PHONE No. ~-~l-~ LICENSE No.~
ADDRESS F~'~~ ' CIW~~ ZIP CODE
INSURANCE CAR~IER~T~ ~~ WORKME~S COMP No. ~O~tl~
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT'INFORMATION
COMPANY~~~ pHONE N~~L~l~ ~ICENSE No.
INSURANCE CAffRIER. ~~ ~ WORKMENS COMP No.
TANK CLEANING INFORMA~ON
ADDRESS ~ ~~ ~~. CIW ~ ZIP CODE
WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~~~
ADDRESS ~ ~~ '~. CI~ ~~~ ZIP CODE
FACILI~ INDENTIFI~ATION NUMBER ~
TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMA~ON
COMPANY~~ I~~ PHONE No. ~-~-[~LICENSE NO. ~1~
TANK DESTINATIO~ ,~~
TANK INFORMATION
TANK No, AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL DA~ES CHEMICAL
~-A ' ~ t~ ~ ~~ STORED ,STO~ED PREVIOUSLY STORED
THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE A~ACHED CONOITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER
STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL RE6ULATIONS.
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLIED UNDER PENAL~ OF PENURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
~PPLICANT NAME (PRIND APPLICANT SI~NA~ .
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
2101 H STREET
FIRE DEPARTMENT
S. D. JOHNSON July 2, 19 9 3 BAKERSFIELD, 93301~'
326-3911
FIRE CHIEF
UNOCAL CORPORATION
'524 DOLORES STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA ~93305
RE: Monitoring requirements for ~underground storage tanks.
Dear.Business Owner:
Our records reveal that no precision tank testing, has been
performed on the seven underground storage tanks located at 524
Dolores Street.
Section 2643 2(A) of Article 4; Title 23, Div. 3, Chapter 16,
'CCR., requires that all underground tanks that do' not utilize
aUtomated leak detection shall have a precision tank test annually.
Additionally, pressurized piping shall be tested annually and non-
pressurized piping shall be tested every three years.
Pipeline leak detectors and automated leak detection systems
also have to be certified to be in working order on an annual
basis.
Please make arrangements to bring the tanks into compliance
with state law.
If you h~v~ any questions, Please call me'at (805) 326-3979.
.... Sincerely, ,,
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
Underground Tank Program
i.
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE".
FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON June 15, 1992 BAKERSFIELD, 93301
¢IRE CHIEF 326-3911
Unocal Corporation
911 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Attn:-Stephan Campbell
Re: Results for tank tightness tests performed at the Unocal
Bakersfield Oil Terminal; permit # BT0026
Dear Mr. Campbell,
As to date no results for the seven tank tightness, te~tS condUCted
on 02/10/92 at.your facility have been reCeived by this,office.
Section 2643(h) of Article 4; Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23 CCR.
states that tank owners must submit any tank tightness test results
to the regulatory agency Within 30 calendar days of completion.
Please submit the results within twenty (20) days from receipt of
this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me
at (805)-326-3797.
~ Joe A.' Dunwoo~y st
¢~.O~;2Jr-.,. /('21'/;'/~ f Hazardous Material Speciali
~O~-~,~~f Underground Tank Program
"WE 'CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT 210.1 H STREET
S. D. JOHNSON BAKERSFIELD, 93301
FIRE CHIEF May 'l 3, ]- 9 9 2 326-3911
Unocal Bakersfield Oil Terminal
524 Delores Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Attn: Earl Cagle
Re: results for tank tightness test; permit # BT0026
Dear Mr. Cagle,
As to date no results ~or the seven tank tightness tests conducted
on 02/10/92 at your facility have been recieved by this office.
Section 2643(h) of Atricle 4; Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23 CCR.
states that tank owners must submitt any tank tightness test
results to the regulatory agency within 30 calander days of
completion.
If you have any questions.regarding this matter, please contact me
at (805)-326-3797.
Sincerely,
Joe A. Dunwoo~5~
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
RECEIVED ' .'
4r£B 1 3
~:ROM ''OhlOCAL BKSFLD TERM. 11.25~ 1991 9:36 P. 4 /
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION~
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
~ ~ ¢ ¢ .(805) 326-3970 .
t. FACILIW/SlTE NO, OF TANKS _~E~E~ HA7 M~T nlv
U~oca[-~a~e~s~e[d
524 DoLores S~.ee~
C{~ NAMi {fA~ ZIP COD[
~aEe~s[~e[d, CA 9330~
/~XTOINO~A~e ~¢O~ATION ~INDNIDU~ ~Ae?N~RSHIP '~LOCALA~O~aT~ ~GOUN~A~NGY ~tTAT~AM~
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PNIMA ~ ~ME~NCYCONTAC~PERSON(gECONDflR~ op1~onQI
ga~l Cable (805)327-7611 On Dut~ ~uc~ Foceman (310)323-3300E:' ..
NIGHT~INAM~(~DT,¢I~. PNOHE~.WITHAR~C~E ,~ N~NAME(~T, FI~ ~flE~,WITHAR~CODE Ex~. 252
Earl Cable (805)397-0158 On Duty Truck Foreman (310)323-3300
ti. PROPERW OWNE~ INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
U~oca[-~aEe~s[~[d
Cl~ NAM~ ~TATE / DPCODE PHONE ~, WI~A~ COD~ '
~a~e~sEield, CA 93305 J ..... ,
IlL TANKOWNE~ INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
/
Unocal-Bakersfield Terminal
MAILING OR ~ ADDnESS ~ ~OX ~ INDIVtDUAL ~ LOCAL AG;NeY . ~ ~TATE A~ENGY I1'
524 Dolores Street TOINOICATC QPA~rN~I~ ~COUN~GENCY ~EDeEALAGeNCY
Bakersfield, CA 93305 ,_.1
OWN.', v ..o0uc, ,N
.-220 1955 n,~%~ 476B~L ~'IESEL ¢t2 ~/N
H-222 ' 1955 676BBL w ~RITON GAS..;E. 30
H-223 1955 47'6BBL '/~'HEAVY' DUTY 40 ~.~t
H-224 1955 476BBL ~fiuARDOL- 30 ~/~/NN
<ES,> 'VO.E.O.
WASTE
YOU HAV E ~INANC~A[ NEsPoNsI~ILi?Y?.
4:. ~' ~o~gtructed o~ same materialS, style mn~ype, then only fill
one segment out. please identify ~anks by owner
J. TANK DESCRIPTION co~PLE~ A~= tT~e.. S~cr~v ~ u~o~
SYSTEM ~ ~ ~lN~Lt WALL ~ 4 S~CONOARY OONTAINM[NT (VAUbTEDTA~ ~
C, INTBRIOR
A,' SYSTEM TYPE A U. 1 SUCTION ~ PRE,SURE A U 3 QRAVI~ A U
B. CON~TRU~ION ~ 1 SINGLE WALL k U 2 ~UBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U ~S UNKNOWN A U ~ O~R
CORROSION A U s ~UMINUM A U 600NOR~ A U ? ST~ELW/~AT1NQ A U 8 1~ ME~ANOL ~MPAT;GLEW~FRP
~RO~ECT[O[~ A U g ~LVANIZE0 ~EL A U t00ATHOOICPROTgC?iON A U OS UNKNOWN A U
D. LEAK DETECTION ~ I AUTOMATIcLINELEAKOE~C?OR ~ 2 LINE T~HTNES~ TESTING ~ $ INTERSm~L
V, TANKLEAK DETECTION , ' '
~PE OF ~ , ~UGL~ WALL . ~ ~ 3INQLE WALL WI~ E~E"'O" LiNEn ~ g5 UNKNOWN
I ~YSTEM 3~ 2 0INGLE WAL~ ~ 4 ~EGUN~ttY CONTAINMCNI' (VAULmDTAN~
~ MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ e POLWINYL CHLORID~ ~ ? ~U~INUM
C. INTENIOH
UNING ~ 5 GL~S LIN,~ ~ ¢ UNLINED ~ "UNKNOWN
lO LINING MATERIAL CQMPATIEL~ WITH 1~ M~ANOL ? YE9 __.
O. CORROSION ~ 1 POLYETHYLENS WRAP ~ 2 cOrriNa ~ 3 VINYL WH~
IV, PIPING INFORMATION ct~ ~ ,~eove~nou.oon u ~u~nonou.o, sa~
B, CONSTRUCTION ~ SiNGlE WAL~ A U 2 ~U~L$ WAL~ A U ~ blN~D TRENCH A U 9~ UNKNOWN A U ~9 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A~ BARE 8TECL A U ~ BT~LB~8 8TELL A U 5 POL'~INYL CHLOe:DE (PVC}A U 4 FI~E~G~S PIP~
CORROSION A U ~ ALUMINUM A ~ e ~NORE~ A U ? ~TE~LWI~OATIN~ A U ~ 1~ ME~ANOL COMPATI~LEW/FRP
V, TANK LEAK DETECTION
~onet~ucted oR same materialst style ~n<~--~z~=, then only fill
one segment out. please identify tanks by owner ID 9.
L TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLE,'~ ALL IT~M$ .- 8FRUITY IP
~. ~,'. ~STA~A*~.~ 1955 J ~. T~.K ~c,~ ,. ~o.~: 20,000'-
111. TANK CONSTRUCTION MA~K ONE I~M ONLY IN BOXE~ A, 8,ANOC,~OALgTHATAPPLIESlNeOXD .....
A. ~PE OF ~ ~ ~UBLE WALL ~ 3 SlNGL~ WA~ WI~ E~ERIOR LINE~ ~ 95 UNKNOWN
C, INTERIOR
~V. PIPING INFORMATION m.c~ A ~.ov~e~u~o~ ~
A, SYSTEM TY~E A g i ~UOTiON ~g~ PRE~sURE A g 3 GRAVI~ A g ~' O~;R
B. CONSTRU~ION ~ SlNOLa WALL A U 2 ~UBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TeEtH A U el UNKNOWN A U
ME~ANOL
~MPATrBLE W/FR~
~ROTECTION A U 9 ~LV~ZBO 8~EL A~t0 OATHOOICeROTECt[~ A U g5 UNKNOWN A U ~ O~ER
L~........ LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOMATtCLINELEAKOE~CTOR ~ 2 LINETeHTNESSTESTINO ~ ~ INTEflS~L~N~ORtNG ~ ~ O~ER "
V, TANK LEAK DETECTION
j ~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 {NV;NTORY ~ECONO[LIArlUN ~ 3 VAPORMON~TORINO~ 4 ~YOMAT~TANK~UOINO ~ S OROUNOWA~RMONITO~ING
I. TANK DESCRIPTION CO~.~TE AV~ ~r;us .. e. Ec~;v ~. UNKNO~
j ,,,,. ow~cn.~- r~ ,.o., H-223 ~ a. ~,u~,c~,~O ~Y: UNKNO~
O, DATE ,NOTALL~O{M~AV~'EAR) 1955 ,j D. rA.~ U~AUnY IN O~[ONS: 20,000
iA, ~PE OF ~ i ~UBLB WALL ~ ~ ~IN~L; WALL WI~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ g5 UNKNOWN
MATERIAL ~ S CONCRETE ~ 6 POLWlNYL CHLORIDE ~ ? ~U~INUM ~ ~ ~ ME~ANOL COMPAT~BLEW~R~
C. INTERIOR
LINING ~ 5 GL~S LINING ~ * UNLINEO ~ "UNKNOWN
la ~NINQ ~AT~RIAL COMPATIBLE WITH I~ M~AN~? YE~ NO__
IV, PIPING INFORMATION ¢mnc~ A ,"ASOVeG~OuN0O. U
C. MATERIAL AND -A~ i gAn~ 8TCCL A U g 8TA~LES8 8TCEL A U 5 ~LWINYL CHLOR',OE (PVC)A U 4 FIBE~S PIP~
J ~O~ROSJON A U G ALUMINUM A U e ~RE~ A U ? ~T~LW/~OAT(NQ ~ U 8 1~ ME~ANOL CQMPATI~L~W/~Rp
PROTECTION A U 90ALVAN;ZED OT;~ A U t00AYHOOICPROT~CT~N k U ~ UNKNOWN k U ga OTHER
V, TANK L~AK DETECTION
~' '-~ 1 VISUAl CII~CK ~J 2 INVENTORY RECQNCILIA~I~ [ VAPOD MONITORmN~ ~ 4 AUTOMATIC TANK OAIJOI~ ~ 5 GROJ)NO WAT~q MON;TORmNG
/
'~' '~" ~nst~uc~ed of t~ same materials, style an~y~)e, then'only fill
one segment out. please identify tanks by owner ID ~.
L TANK DESCRIPTION co~pLE~ A~U ~T~.. s~o,~v ~
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE I~M ONLY IN BQXES A, B, ANDC,~OAL[THATAP~LIESlNBOXD ......
A. ~PE OF ~ ~ ~UBLE WALL ~ ~ SlNG~ WA~ Wt~ E~ER~OR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN "
SYSTEM ~ ~ $1NUL~ WALL ~ 4 9~CON~ARY CONTAINMENT (VAU~TEDTA~m ~ ~ O~R
- C. INTERIOR
LINING ~ 5 ~SS LINI~ ~ 8 UNLINED ~ ea UN~O~ ~ ~ omen
Jr. PIPIN9 INFORMATION, CIRC~ ~ IFA~EeROUNDOR U
B. CONSTRU~ION ~U)~_ ~INGL~ W~L k U a ~UBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U ~S UNKNOWN
CORRO610N A U a ~UMINUM A U e ~ONORE~ A~ aTEEkW/~ATINQ A U 8 1~ ME~ANOL ~M~AT[gLEW/FRP
PROTECTION A U '~ ~LV~I~EO 8~EL A U 40 OATHOOICPROTE~tlO~ A U 9~ UNKNOWN A U ~ O~ER '
O. LEAK DETECTION ~ 1 AUTOktATICLINELEAKOE~C?OR ~2 LINE T~HTNE~S TESTING ~ t ~NTERSm~L
V, TANK LEAK
~ 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 INVENTORY REGONGILIATIUN ~ 3 VAPOR MONITORING ~ 4 ~tOMATICTANK~UGiNG ~
I
I. TANK DESCRIPTION CO..U~T~ A~U ~r;Mg -- S.~C~;¥ ~.
III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES *
A. ~PEOF ~ , ~UBLE WALL ~ ~ ~INaLE WALL, wm~ E~Enmoa LINER ~ aS UNKNOWN
%/~ ~ATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POL~INYL CHLORIDE ~
C. iNTERIOR
lB LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 1~ M~A~L ?
m ...... _
A, ~Y~TIM TYPE A U i ~UGT~ON ~ ~nEe~UnE A U
g. CONSTRUCTION ~ ~mNGkE WAL~ A U E ~UBLE WALL A U ~ LINED TRASH A U ~0 UNNNOWN A U S~ OTHER
CORROSION 6 ALUMINUM A U e ~RE~ ~T 8TEELW/~OATINe k U B 1~ ME~ANOL COMPATI~LEW~FRP
~ROTECTION a U g OALVAN;ZCD ~Te~ A U 10 OAYH~ICPROTCCTIO~ k U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 O~ER
V. TANK LEAK DETEOTION
:' '-' 1 VISUAl Cll~CK ~ ~ INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [~J VA~On~ONJO~mNu~ 4 AUTOMATIC TANK OAUOINO ~ 5 GROUNOWAT~DMON*TORING
trucked of ~ same materials, style an~ype, then only fill
one segment ~ut~ please identify tanks by owner ID ~.
I. TANK D~ORIPTION comP~E~ AUL ~t~mS .. SP~Y ~ UnK~o~
IlL TAN K CONSTRUCTION u~K o~ ,~ O~LY ,~ BOXES A, ~, Am~ C, ~0 ALL T~T AP"U~S ~ SOX D
SYSTEM i~ ~ ~INUL% WALL ~ 4 SECONOARY CONTAINMENT (VAUbTEDTAN~ ~ ~ O~ER
:, INTERIOR
LINING ~ 5 ~88 LINI~ ~ 8 UNLINED ~ Be UN~O~ ~ ~ OmER
B, CONSTRU~ION ~1 ~INGLE WALL k U 2 ~UBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRE~H A U ~ UNKNOWN
C. MATERIAL AND A~l ~R~ST~L A U a 9TAIN~U~ 81~EL A U 3 ~lNV[ CHLORI~[~VC)A U ~ FISUHG~S PIPE
CORROSION & U ~ ~UMINUM A U 600NCAE~ A U ? ST;EkW~ATINQ A U 8 1~ ME~ANOL
PROTECTION A U g ~LVANIZEO 8~EL A U ~0 QATHOOICPROTECt[ON A U gS UNKNOWN A U ~ O~Efl
V, TANK LEAK DETECTION
I, TANK DESCRIPTION COM.~T~ ^~.'~U~ -- sP~Cl~¥ r. UN.NOw~
I A. OWNER'~ TANK ;. O. ~ ~, MANUFAC~R~O ~Y;'
C, QAT~ ,NOTALLEQ (M~OAY6'EAR) ~. ~ANK ~A~I1Y IN
A, ~PEOF ~ I ~UBLE WALL ~ 9 ~INQLE W~ Wl~ E~ERIOR LINER ~ as UNKNOWN
MATERIAL ~ 5 CONCRETE ~ 6 POLWINYL CHLORi~ ~ ? ~UMINUM ~
C. INTERIOR
D. CORROSION ~ 1 PO~Y~THY~EN~ WRAP ~ 2 COATI~ ~ 3 VINYL WR~ ~ 4 ;'8~HO~S REINFORCED PLASTIC
IV, PIPING INFORMATION cmc~ . ,.~eave~.ou.oo. u
.....................
A. 8Y~T~M TYPE A U I SUCTION A U EeSUn; AU O QRAVi~ A U e~ O~BR
~. CONSTRUCTION A U + ~N~E W4~ A U a ~gL$ WALL A U ~ LJNCD TR;NeH A U ~ UN~OWN A U ~ O~en
C, MATERIAL AND A U i BAR~ 8TECL A U ~ aT~LGS8 8TCEL A U 5 ~LWI~L QHLOA;DE(~VC)A U
CORROSION A U ~ ALUMINUM A U g ~RE~ A U ? ~TE~LW/~OATiN~ A U ~ 1~ ME~ANOL COMPATI~LEW/FRP
~ROTECTION A U e OALVAN;~D ~T;~ 'A U t00AYH~IePflQTCOTION A U ~ UNKNOWN
D, LEAK DETECTiO~ ~ 1 [~MATIO LINE LEAK DETECTOR. ~ 2 LINE T~NTNESg TESTING ~ 3 ~hffORINGINT~SnTIAL ~ g90~GR
V. TANK L~AK D~T~oTION
"
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500.
Torrance, California 90503
(310)542-4342
INVOICE
CUSTOMER: INVOICE NUMBER : 92117
INVOICE DATE : FEB. 18, 1992
UNOCAL BAKERSFIELD OIL TERMINAL
524 DELORES STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 Customer PO : VERBAL
ATTN: EARL CAGLE
Work Order ~ : 92117
Financial Terms : DUE UPON RECEIPT
Finance Charges : 1.5% per month
LOCATION:
UNOCAL OIL TERMINAL JOB NUMBER : UNOCAL TERMINAL
524 DELORES STREET BAKERSFIELD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 SALESMAN : NDE
(805) 327-7611
UNIT T
ITEM DATE DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE X AMOUNT
1 02/11/92 PRECISION TANK TESTS ON FOUR 4.00 550.00 N 2200.00
(4) UNDERGROUND STORAGE
SYSTEMS. (4-20K TANKS)
2 02/12/92 PRECISION TANK TESTS ON TWO 2.00 345.00 'N 690.00
(2) UNDERGROUND STORAGE
SYSTEMS. (10K & 550 TANKS)
3 02/12/92 PRECISION TANK TEST ON ONE 1.00 550.00 N 550.00
(1) UNDERGROUND STORAGE
SYSTEM. (20K TANK)
SUB TOTAL 3440.00
TAX 0.00
TOTAL 3440.00
3111
FILE
CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM INTEGRITY
I~IDE ENVIRONNENTAL CORPORATION
20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500
Torrance, California 90503
(310)542-4342
CLIENT: UNOCAL TERMIANL LOCATION: BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL LOCATION~: BK. TRM.
524 DELORES STREET 524 DELORES STREET
BAKERSFZ~r.n, CA 93305 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
(805) 327-7611 (805) 327-7611
ATTN: EARL CAGLE TEST DATE: 02/11/1992
The following underground storage tank system tests were conducted in
accordance with the applicable portions of NFPA Title 329, 40 CFR 280.43(c),
and 40 CFR 280.44(b) and state and local regulations.
TANK DESCRIPTION
~Tk Tank I.D. Product Capacity Diameter Level Tank
No. Description Gallons Inches Inches Material
i 20K DSL #220 DIESEL FUEL 20000.0 120.00 126.00
2 20K L/OIL #221 LUBE OIL 20000.0 120.00 123.00 /
/
3 20K L/OIL ~222 LUBE OIL 20000.0 120.00 127.00
4 20K L/OIL #223 LUBE OIL 20000.0 120.00 123.00
TEST RESULTS
Tk VPLT LEAK PRODUCT LINE LEAK DETECTOR ULLAGE
No. GPH :PASS/FAIL GPH PASS/FAIL PRESENT ,PASS/FAILPERFORMED PASS/FAIL
i -0.0408 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 +0.0268 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 -0.0338 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 -0.0078 PASS N/A . N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Certification Date: 02/11/1992 Document No.: N/A
Repairs\Replacements\Comments:
Other Comments:
Name of Tester Certif¥inq Results: ERIC PRICE
CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM INTEGRITY
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
20000 Mariner Ave, Suite 500
Torrance, California 90503
(310)542-4342
CLIENT: UNOCAL TERMINAL LOCATION: BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL LOCATION~: BK. TRM.
524 DELORES STREET 524 DELORES STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
(805) 327-7611 (805) 327-7611
ATTN: EARL CAGLE TEST DATE: 02/12/1992
The following underground storage tank system tests were conducted in
accordance with the applicable portions of NFPA Title 329, 40 CFR 280.43(c),
and 40 CFR 280.44(b) and state and local regulations.
TANK DESCRIPTION
Tk Tank I.D. Product Capacity Diameter Level Tank
No. Description Gallons Inches Inches Material
1 ~5 20K LUBEOIL LUBE OIL 20000.0 120.00 127.00
2 #6 10K LUBEOIL LUBE OIL 10000.0 95.00 111.00
3 ~7 550 WST/OIL LUBE OIL 550.0 48.00 59.00
TEST RESULTS
Tk VPLT LEAK PRODUCT LINE LEAK DETECTOR ULLAGE
No. GPH PASS/FAIL GPH PASS/FAIL PRESENT PASS/FAIL PERFORMED PASS/FAIL
i +0.0108 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 -0.0068 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3 -0.0488 PASS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Certification Date: 02/12/1992 Document No.: N/A
Repairs\Replacements\Comments:
Other Comments:
Name of Tester Certif¥inq Results: ERIC PRICE
.~,~ ' :ENV.:fRON~TAL. HEALTH
' 2730'."'M"' S~ET, SUITE 300, ~AKERSFIEL~CA.9~0i
.... (805)86~-3636
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ~USSTANC~ STORAGE ~AC~L~TY
" ~ ~NSPECT~ON REPORT
TYPE 0F:: ZNSPECT~ON= ROUTZNE ......... ~d:~ ......... REJNSPECT~ON .......................... CONPLAZNT ..............................
FAC~EZTY NANE:UNOCAL" BAKERSFIELD TERN~'NAL
FAC~LZTY. ADDRESS:524 DOLORES
CZTY. OF 8AKERSFZELD
OWNERS NANE :gtJ..9 .&k .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
CONNENTS: ~ ·
[TEN
1. RRIMARY CONTAIN"ENT MONiTORINC:
Intercepting an directing system
d, In-tank Level Sen2ing Device
e. 6~oundwater Monitoring ..
f. Vado~e Zone MonitoPing '.
~'~ SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MONITORING:
a. Liner
b. Oouble-Wall~d tank
'~¢'(a~ Pressurize~
~ 'Suction
'c. GPavity
~'TIGHTNESS TESIN6
· ~ ~ NE~ CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICATIONS
'' ~: CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT
~. ~INTENANCE, GENERAL SAFETY, AND
OPERATING CONDITION OF FACILITY
C~MMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
KEf COUNTY AIR pOLLUTION CON DISTRICT
" ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 275
· Bakersfield, CA. 93301
· ;.. (805) 861-3682
' ,'" '~'PHASE I VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM '
Station Name~- '¢%(~ (_-£~'
{." · '. c~mpany Mailing Address J $ ~'_ ~; '~. ~' ~ --
~ " System Type, ...... ~ '
., _ k. . . ~oaxial
Inspector...': h: ~.~,_ .~~~ Notice Rec'd. By ,~/~2/' ~..--:}. .'
';;,.,.- - · ' · - ' . TAN~I TANK ~2 ~NK
· . . .t ..... ~. TANK LOGA~ON REFERENCE ........ ~"~~ ' ~' '"
..~i. 3. BROKEN OR MISSING VAPOR CAP .... '"'
, 4. BROKEN OR MISSING FILL CAP
5. BROKEN CAM LOCK ON VAPOR CAP
6. FI~ ~APS NOT PROPERLY SEATED :: , . .
~: ' 7, VAPOR CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED
.. :,
" 8. ~SKET MISSING FROM FILL CAP - ' . ....
9. GASKET MISSING FROM VAPOR CAP
.~ ._. ~0. FI~ ADAPTOR NOT ~GHT
11. 'VAPOR ADAPTOR'NOT TIGHT
12. GASKET BE~EEN ADAPTOR & FILL
~. TUBE MISSING / IMPROPERLY SEATED
13. DRY BREAK GASKETS DETERIORATED
14. EXCESSIVE VERTICAL PLAY IN
COAXIAL,FILL TUBE -
- .. 15. COAXIAL FILL TUBE SPRING
". MECHANISM DEFECTIVE
~ .
17. ~BE LENGTH MEASUREMENT '~'~
18. DIFFERENCE (SHOULD BE 6" OR LESS')
.19. OTHER
20. COMMENTS: ~."? ~','¢--.~ '~ . _ ..
..5:. . ? . ~
WARNING: SYS~MS MARKED WI~ A CHECK ABOVE ARE IN VlOLA~ON OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLU~ON CONSOL
DISTRICT RULE{S) 209, .412 AND/OR 412.1. · THE CADFORNIA HEAL~ & SAFETY CODE' SPECIFIES PENAL~ES
OF UP TO $1,~.~ PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION. ~LEPHONE (805) 861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLU-
9149-1OLO ' APCD FILE : ' ....
· -; .... ,-" KF OUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTR DISTRICT .
· ~ 2700 "M" Street, Suite 2'75
~ ?~ Bakersfield, ~;A. 93301
?' ' ' ' (805) 861-3682
, - '~ · PHASE II vAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM
· . ~. . . ~.~ ~ .,~ . ~ ?'...
' Contact ~~. ¢. ~r.¢¢ P~one /~/ ~ )-~;~--3~Svstem~V-e. B& RJ HI HE eH HA
· ? GAS GRADE
,. NO~LE TYPE .~ ~-...-.-.
. 1. CERT. NO~ ...... ~;; ';~': ...... :: ~:' ': .................................
' 2. CHECK VALVE ~ / ~ ·
.'N ,I
Z 4. RING, RIVET :
L
E 5. BELLOWS .~ ~ ~.
1.I HOSE CONDITION , .q 0 ~Z
~ O 3. CONFIGURATION '- I / ,~ '-
, R .
~ 4. SWIVEL
H
O 5. OVERH~D RETRACTOR
S
E 6. POWER/PILOT ON
I.!
7. SIGNS POSTED : . .
Key to system ~pes: Key to deficiencies: NC= not certified, B= broken
BA=Balance HE =Healey M= missing, TO= torn, F= flat, ~= tangled.
Rd =Red Jacket' GH=Gulf Hasselmann AD=needs adjustment, L= long, LO= loose,
HI =Hirt HA =Hasstech S= sho~ MA= misaligned, K= kinked, FR= frayed.
· * INSPECTION RESULTs **
Key to inspection results: Blank= OK, 7= Repair within seven
days, T= Tagged (no~le tagged out-of-order until repaired)
~ U= Taggable violation but left in use.
COMMENTS:
.......... VIOLATIONS: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH Al"T-.OR U-"CODE IN:INSPECTION.RESULTS, ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN;COUNTY .......
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL, DISTRICT RULE(S) 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE
SPECIFIES PENALTIES OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH DAY OF VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805) 861-3682
CONCERNING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE VIOLATION. i
' NOTE: CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 419~0.2i 'REQUIRES THAT THE ABOVE LISTED 7-DAY DEFICIENCIES
BE CORRECTED WITHIN 7 DAYS. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION
9149-I01~; APCD FfLE