Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-03/21/91 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTM BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION Date APPLICATION Application No. in conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, application is made Nome of Company -"'-Address to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or creating con- ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows: Permit ~ .......... I~te ........................................... California [2tense 140~7 JOHN HOWARD CONS]]RUCI'ION. INC. 610 WiLLiAMS ROB£nT W. JUSTESON BAKERSI=IELO, CALIF. 93305 TREASURER PHONE (805) 327-9132 FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY Activity Date # Of Tanks Comments I " ~ Environmented Health Services Department RANDALL L. ABBOTT STEVE McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ~ ~, P~o. Cont,.ol ~m~t DAVID PRICE ril wicu~ ,I. RODD¥, Al'CO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR P~nnin9 & ~t Services Department ~ ~IAbtF. S, AJCP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT March 21, 1991 The Bakersfield Californian P. O. Bin 440 Bakersfield, California 93'302 CLOSURE OF 5 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE TANKS LOCATED AT 1707 EYE STREET IN BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA. PERMIT #A340-16/160049 This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representat~ive of existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability-under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up. existing, additional or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. Additionally, be advised that changes in the p~esent o~ p~oposed use of the site may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact ~ me~ (805) 8~1-~3~ P~og~am (~age~ ~ ) Envi~on~al ~alth~ices Department 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636 FAX: (805) 861-3429 JAN HEFNER Purchasing Manager February 11, 1987 Mr. Bill Schiede Kern County Health Department 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 Dear Bill: Enclosed is the proposal from BSK & Associates regarding. the assessment of soil contamination near our waste oil tank. Please review this as soon as possible and notify me as to its acceptability so we may proceed. Thank you. Sincerely, JH/bp P.O. BOX 440 (1707 "EYE" STREET) · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 · (805) 395-7433 OUR JOB B87037 Assessment of Soil Contamination Underground Waste Oil Tank Southwest Corner of 17th and Eye Street Bakersfield, California BSK & ,\,sc)ciate~ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE t' 'INTRODUCTION 1 PREVIOUS WORK 1 ['- SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPT. ION 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 4 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING 4 CONCLUSIONS 7 I.~ RECOMMENDATIONS 8 LIMITATIONS .' 9 APPENDIX' "A'' - Preliminary (1/19/87) Analytical Laboratory Testing (BC Laboratories, Inc.) APPENDIX "B" - Current (2/19/87) Analytical Laboratory Testing (BC L~boratories, Inc. I - Chain of Custody Document ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1 - Site Plan TABLE TABLE I - Laboratory Test Results BSK Associates BSI<& Associates Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. I. Wesley I. Braun, CE Iohn R. Hedlev. CE James G. Sutton, CE John H. Kirk, CEG Robert D. Skaggs, CF John 0. Moore, CE Alex Y. Eskandari, CE Thomas E. Vahlstrom, Ch Hugo Kevorkian, CF John M. Minney, CE March 6, 1987 OUR JOB B87037 The Bakersfield Californian .~Post Office Box 440 Bakersfield, California 93302 Attention: Ms. Jan Hefner " SUBJECT: Assessment of Soil Contamination Underground Waste Oil Tank Southwest Corne.r of 17th and Eye Street Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: At your request, we have performed a soil contamination investigation at the subject site. This investigation provides 'further assessment of the extent of soil contamination associated with a waste oil tank in the northwest corner of the site. The soil sampling and testing program utilized in this investigation was proposed in response to the requirements of the Kern County Health Department (KCHD) (Appendix "A"). Three perimeter borings were located ten feet from the center of the former tank to assess the lateral extent of the contamination. Samples were obtained at the depths of 5, 10 and 15 feet below the ground surface. Based on field and laboratory testing, it appears that the zone of contamination is less.than 13 feet deep with a maximum radius of 10 feet, centered at the center of the former tank. The following report presents our findings, conclusions and recommendations. Soil Engineering * Engineering Geology * Engineering Laboratories * Chemical Laboratories ....................... ' i'-I Fresno, California 93706 · 1414 Stanislaus Street · Telephone (209) 48S-8310 [] Visalia, California 93278 * 3901 So. Moone¥ Blvd., P.O. Box 3236 * (209) 732-8857 [] Bakersfield, California 93304 * 117 "V" Street * Telephone (805) 327-0671 [] Pleasanton, California 94566 * 5729-G Sonoma Drive * Telephone (415) 462-4000 Assessment of Contamination ~m~ OUR JOB B87037 Underground Waste Oil Tank February 23, 1987 Southwest Co. rner of 17th and Eye Street Page 2 Bakersf.iel'd, California We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call. Respectfully submitted, BSK & Associates [enneth d. Cla~k Dnn . oore, r Civil Engineer KJC/~BM/pd Enclosures BSK &- X'd'so-elates 1 ASSESSMENT OF SOIL CONTAMINATION UNDERGROUND WASTE OiL TANK · !' 1707 EYE STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA -' INTRODUCTION .This report summarizes a soil contamination assessment performed ~t the southwest corner of 17th and Eye Street in Bakersfield, California. This 'investigation was. performed subsequent to the removal of an underground waste oil storage tank and preliminary soil testing. This report is based on a field exploration program of three boreholes, laboratory analytical t.ests of soil samples, and in part on previous preliminary tests. It is our understanding that the property was. an old gas station site. The gas station was probably constructed in the 1940's, by ARCO. The station was purchased by the Bakersfield Californian in 1971, and was leased out and used as a service st'ation from 1971 to 1979. The station was converted into parking and loading areas around 1980. The subject tank was located at the northwest corner of the property. The tank was installed with the construction of the gas station and had not been used since the station was converted to parking. Through the years of usage, spent oil and chemical solvents may have been discharged into the tank. The tank, made of steel, was about 4 feet in diameter, 4 feet long and buried under 3 feet of soil cover. PREVIOUS WORK The subject tank was removed on January 19, 1987 by McNabb Construction Inc. of Bakersfield, California. Two soil samples were collected at the time of the tank removal. These samples BSK & Associates Page 2 Were reportedly obtained at 2 and 6 feet below the bottom of the tank. Chemical analysis of soil samples ·was performed by BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. · Test results, included in Appendix "A", indicated non-detectable levels of · benzene, toluene, xylene, total petroleum hydrocarbons and total organic halides in both samples. The oil and grease, however, was tested to.be 14,520 ppm for the 2 foot sample and. 92 ppm for the 6·foot sample. A small amount of discolored soil was removed SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The waste oil tank was located in the northwest corner of the parking lot at· the intersection of 17th and Eye Streets (see Site Plan, Figure.l). The closest strUcture to the site is a medical office building that abuts the west border of the site approximately 15 feet from the center of the tank. FIELD EXPLORATION The current field exploration by BSK & Associates was performed on February 19, 1987. Three borings were drilled to assess the lateral extent of'contamination from the former waste oil tank. Approximate boring locations are shown on Fi'gure 1. Samples were obtained at 5, 10 and 15 feet below the ground surface. Borings B-1 and B-2 penetrated a thin asphalt cover. Boring B-3 was relocated from the intended location to avoid a six inch concrete slab. A geologist was responsible for preparation of field boring logs, recording of field conditions, soil sample handling and preservation, and control of the field equipment cleaning process. BSK I Page 3 The'dri-lling was performed with a truck-mounted .drill rig using 8" hollow stem augers. The augers acted as continuously advancing steel casings preventing test holes from caving above the levels to be sampled~ Soil samples were obtained by lowering a 2.5 inch inside diameter sampler inside the hollow stem auger and driving it into undisturbed soils. The sampler was equipped with stainless steel liners designed to receive intact soil specimens. The sampler was cleaned with.distilled water prior to '~each sampling .action. Clean stainless steel liners were placed ~inside the sampler .Steam cleaning of the augers was also performed prior to entering the site and between test holes to prevent cross contamination. .. ..mmm~ m The samples were capped with aluminum fo·il, then with pressure fitted plastic caps, and sealed with adhesive tape. Each of the samples was labeled with an adhesive-backed, label including boring designation, depth of sample, and initials of the individual preparing the sample. The samples were placed in an insulated chest for preservation and transported to BC Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. A Chain of Sample Custody form was prepared which recorded the name of the individuals col.lecting, transferring, and analyzing the samples. A copy of the Chain of Custody form is included in Appendix "B" The'boreholes were backfilled to the ground surface with grout containing sand, gravel, and 7 sacks of Portland Cement per cubic yard. Borehole cuttings were ~tockpiled at the site for eventual disposal by the owner· BSK & Assoc ate~ Page 4 -' SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The native soils· encountered at the site consist of interbedded silty sand'and sand. These soils have been classified as Younger Alluvium,. consisting of' alluvial fan, channel, and flood plain deposits of the· ancestral Kern River. A total of 3 borings, B-1 through B-3, ·were drilled in the v~cinity of the former waste oil tank site. The uppermost soil encountered in drilling was a brown silty sand. The silty sand grades to light yellowish brown, fine to coarse sand at about 12 feet below the ground surface..SOme gravel was n~ted at the maximum depth of exploration of I5 feet. ~ .·.7 Groundwater was not encountered during our field exploration. Information published by the Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) indicates that the depth to groundwater in this area is greater than 100 feet. The boring logs, presented in Figures 2 through 4, should be consulted for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. The logs contain both factual and interpretive information. Horizontal lines,~designating the interface between differing materials, represent approximate boundaries. The transition between soil layers is typically gradual. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING Laboratory tests were performed by BC Laboratories Inc. Soil samples were tested for the presence of·oil and'grease, and total l~ad, per the request of Mr. Bill Scheide of the Kern County Health Department (KCHD). BSK Associates' Chemical tests on soil samples were conducted in accordance with the following listed E.P.A, meth6ds. Constituent E.P.A. Method Oil and ~Grease, 413.1 Total Lead 7421 T~tal lead testing is conducted by a process of total digestion. The sample is digested in nitric acid, filtered, and injected in an inductively coupled emissions spectrometer. For oil and grease the soil sample is prepared by fre'on extraction. Freon is then evaporated 'and the extracted oil and grease is weighed. The test results are included in Appendix "B" and summarized in Table 1. BSK & Associate~ Page 6 TABLE 1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Loca.tion Sample Oil and Borin9 Depth Ft. Grease Total Lead Preliminary Investigation (Mc Nabb Construction) Be:.low Tank Center 2' 14520 - "~ " " 6' 92 - Investigation Performed by BSK B-1 5' 42 2.9 B-1 . 10' 34 ND B-1 15' "" 32 2.5 B-2 5' 24 3.3 8-2 10' 64 ND B-2 15' 20 ND B-3 5' ND ND B-3 10' 24 ND B-3 15' 22 ND TTLC: 1000 STLC: 5 Lower Limit of Detection 20 2.5 ND = None Detected. All Units in mg/kg BSK ~ As_~dd[3~L~ · ' CONCLUSIONS Preliminary tests, performed by others in conjunction with tests from this investigation, suggest a zone of contamination with a vertical depth of 6 feet below the bottom of the.tank (13 feet bel'ow the ground surface) and a lateral extent of approximately 10 feet from the tank center. Table 1 summarizes the test results of major c.ontaminants and the Total Threshold Limit Ooncentration {TTLC) for lead. · Lead: TTLC performed on soil extracts indicate total lead . ~. concentrations ranging from a maximum of 3.3 mg/kg to less than i laboratory detection limits (2.5 mg/kg). These concentrations are' also lower than the soluble threshhold limit concentration (STLC) of 5 mg/kg and, assuming that the lead was entirely organic,'lower than DOHS action'levels of 13 mg/kg.. The lead concentrations found in the tests appear to be background ~ concentrations. The concentration range produced by the test i indicates ,non-hazardous" conditions. Oil and Grease: Oil and grease concentrations ranging from 42 to less than 20 mg/kg were measured in the test specimens. The action level for oil and grease in soil is typically set by the local enforcement agencies (e.g. Kern County Department of Health, KCHD) to reflect site conditions such as permeability of the soils, the depth to groundwater, and aquifer characteristics. Where there is a reasonable separation between the contaminated soil and groundwater, it is our understanding that the KcHD requires soil with oil and grease concentrations higher than 1000 mg/kg be removed and disposed of at a proper disposal site. Information published by. KCWA. indicates that the depth to groundwater below the site is greater than 100 feet. Except for the soil sample obtained at 2 feet below the tank bottom, all oil and grease concentrations were well below the 1000 mg/kg action level. BSK & Associate~ Page 8 Benzene' Toluene, Xslene: Preliminary soil testing performed by. others for benzene, toluene, xylene, total petroleum hydrocarbons and total halides indicated non-detectable levels 2 feet organic below the tank. {See BC Labo'ratory Report, Appendix "A"). RECOMMENDATIONS Tests performed, in conjunction with this investigation produced lead, and oil and grease concentrations below action levels. Tests performed in conjunction with an earlier investigation (Mc Nabb Construction) indicated.oil and grease concentrations in excess of the KCHD action level. The data suggest that contamination in concentrati'ons greater than action levels is concentrated'in the immediate'area of the tank and does not extend beyond a radius of 10 feet nor a depth of 6 feet below, tank bottom (13 feet below surface). Given the non-volatile nature of the contaminants, aeration of soils is not a likely option for clean-up. Dis o~.f contamiJl~~to a suitable landfill appears to be the more expedient solution,. Moreover, limited work space and site location would likely make on-site clean-up difficult. The actual configuration of the' extent of contaminated soils should be established during excavation. The contaminated soils should be removed to' the levels set by the KCHD. The actual volume of contaminated soil may be different than the volume implied by the radius and depth of contamination previously described. Partial removal of the concrete slab may be necessary to reach contaminated Sqils. periodic laborato'ry te~ting of soils should be performed during excavation and clean-up to allow complete removaT of contaminated soils. BSK & Assooates Page 9 LIMITATIONS The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on the data obtained from the test borings and sampling performed at the locations shown on the Site Plan {Figure 1), and the soil sample analytical test results. The report does not reflect Variations which may exist between borings and sampling points. · These variations cannot be anticipated nor can they be entire~y accounted for in spite of exhaustive additional testing. ~'This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices for the area, based on the of local and state jurisdictions. No guidelines warranties, either expressed or implied, are made. BSK & Associates BSK & Associate-. O~JOB B87037 Feb-ruary, 1957 FiGURE 1 '['.' - 17th Street Concrete Sidewalk L ApProximate Location !' ,,; /Former Waste Oil ~ Tank Exi s t lng I I Bui£ding '~' '~pproximate Excavation I Eye B-2 ~oundary I Street Approximate Boundary of Concrete Slab LEGEND SITE PLAN Approximate' Location Assessment of Soil Contamination for Proposed Boring 17th Street and Eye Street Bakersfield, California BSK Associates CEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS- ~R~SNO · WS^U^ · DATE: . LOG DESIGNATION B-{ LOGGED BY: I~C . ' ELEVATION: '" WATER LEVEL:'No Groundwater Encountered JO8: B87037 EOUIPMENT: Mobile B-50, 8" .hollow stem auger FIGURE: 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ SOIL OR R~K DESCRIPTION NOTES ~ Z~ ~ 2" Asphalt "' SM SILTY S~: bro~; fine to medium; damp. 2.5 13 No petroleum odor -.' SM S~D/SILTY S~D: yellowish bro~; fine to medium; damp. IO- 2.5 20 No petroleum odor SW S~D: light yellowish bro~ to white; . f~e to .coarse with some gravel; damp. 2.5 39 No petroleum odor Boring Ter~nated at 15 ' 20- ~25 THE ~G~ S~W SUBSURFACE CONOITtONS ( ~ ) S~PLE~ ~NS~O[ AT TH~ DATES AN0 L~ATIONS INDICATED, AN0 IT {2 ) ~O~ ~E~-~ ~NC~ 0~. IS NOT WA~ANTE~ THAT THEY AR~ REPreSENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS ( ~ I ~O~uL~c~LL~ ~US~[~ ANO TIMES, DATE: 2-Zg-a7 .- LOG DESIGNATION · LOGGED BY: KC .. ' ELEVATION: WATER LEVEL: No Groundwater Encountered JO8: B87037 EQUIPMENT: Mobile B-50, 8" hollow stem auger FIGURE: 3  2" Asphalt - . 8H SILTY S~D: bro~; f~e eo medium; damp. 2.5 1~ ~o peeroleum odor SM S~D/S~TY S~D: yellowish bro~; fine to medi~; ~mp. . IO- - 2.5 23 No petroleum odor . J SW S~D: light yellowish bro~ to white; f~e to coarse with some . gravel; damp. 15 -- 2.5 41 No petroleum odor - Boring Ter~nated ~ at 15' ZO- _ ~ 25 TH~ ~GS S~W SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ( ~ ~ $~LE~ ~S~O~ IS NOT WArRANTeD THAT THeY ARE R~P~{SENTATIV~ OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS {P ) M~OR&UL~C&LL~ ~USMEO &As~t AND TIMES. DATE 2-19-87." LOG DESIGNATION LOGGED BY: KC .. " - ELEVATION: WATER LEVEL: No Groundwater Encountered JOB: B87037 EQUIPMENT: M_obile B-50, 8" ho~ow s~em auger FIGURE: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SOIL OR R~K DESCRIPTION NOTES 2.5 ~3 ~o pe~;o~eua odor SM S~D/SILTY S~D: yellowish bro~; fine . to medium; damp. IO- _ 2.5 3Z No petroleum odor Sw S~: light yeIll0wish bro~ to white; _ f~e to coarse with some gravel; damp. 2.5 44 No petroleum odor .... Bor~g Te~inated ~ aC 15 ' ZO- _ IS NOT WARRANTED THefT THeY AR~ R~P~SENTATlV~ 17~ F~we, Stree! KERN COUNTY HEATH DEPARTMENT .E^~. OFF,CE. . Bakersfield, California g3305 Leon M Heb~ts~, M.O. ENVlRONMEN~L HEATH OIVlSION T~phone {805) 86 !-3636 .. ?- " DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMEN~L HEAL~ January 26. 1987 The Bakersfield Californian O. Box 3akersfield, California 93302 %ttn: Jan Hefner. . This department has reviewed the lab analysis for the five underground storage tanks removed at the downtown facility on I707 Eye Street, Permit #A340- .6; The samples indicate no significant contamination present underneath tanks ~-~ through #4. Those four tank abandonments are complete. "However the waste oil tank (tank #5) .on the north end of the proper~y has contamination and -squires a site characterization. Per our telephone conversation of January 21, 1987, this departmen~ requests further exploration 'to find the full lateral and vertical extent of :he contamination. This can be accomplished by exploratory borings outside the ~erimeter of the tank hole. A proposal must be submitted to the Kern County Health Department and approved prior to exploration. The work must be planned .nd directed by an approved environmental assessment contractor. You have 30 ays to submit the proposal to this office for approval. To help you with developing this proposal, I have included a copy of the its characterization proposal outline. Use it as a guide in preparing your ~roposal. In this case, there is some evidence to suggest the plume of'contamination s shallow. You still must find the lateral extent as well as prove that the full depth is less than 10 - 12 feet as indicated by the soil analysis. Once you have found the full extent of contamination, be prepared to propose a method of disposal or treatment for the contaminated Soil. We can discuss those options at a later date. Sincerely, Bill Scheide Environmental Health Special~st ............ Hazardous Materials Management Program BS:sw ~C1 o~;ure OtSr~CT OFfiCES J. J. EGLIfl, lEG. CHEM. ENGL MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327.491' Purgeable Aromatics . (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCT40N INC. Date of 2~I~ STARK STREET REPORT:I-I~-8? CA. 93305 LAB No.:3~ BAKERSFIELD, Sample Description: NORTH WASTE OIL ~' ~ · ' "DATE ANALYSIS DATE DATE SAMPLE /, ~,-. COMPLETED: SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED B LAB: Minimum Reporting Analyses Report,lng Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.I0 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 ~m-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 :~ o-X¥1ene ' ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isoprgpyl Benzene ~g/g ~none detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g n~e detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected ~0.50 .:'.' 0£1 & Grease: 92. rog/kg 'r,- EPA 5080/8015/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) refers.~o "less ~han". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present CC1 to C80) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleu hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other .constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The'sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. By -- . . --- Analyst Ii! MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327.491' RECEIVED .~i Pu~geab'le A¢omat its .~ (SOIL). [~- McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. ' Da te of ~ STARK STREET REPORTiI~l~-87 BAKERSFI~D~ CA. ~3305 LAB No.:3~5 sample'Descr'i~tion: NORTH WASTE OIL ~:, · DATE .- DATE SAMPLE , ..~ :: 'DATE ANALYSIS i, - ' cOMpLETED: · SAMPLE COLLECTED: -: . RECEIVED B LAB: ...: Repot t ing Aha I yses Repot , Constituent Units Results Leal BenZene ~g/g none detected 0.10 ... Toluene .~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected ,. 0.10 .' . p-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene ~g/g ' none detected 0.10 o-X~lene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isop~opyl Benzene ~g/g non~ detected 0.I0 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g no~e detected 5.00 ', Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected ·0.50 EPA 5080/8015/8080: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) ~eEe=s ~ "less ~". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (Cf to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in · addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum hydro.carbon values may be less than, .equal to, or greater than any other constituent.- TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. LABORATORIES, Inc. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. ~TROLEU~ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 117 "V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87 Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2976 Attention: Kenneth Clark TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample DescriPtion: B-3-3 @ 1~' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Ca]~f0rnian Title 22 Total Met~ls~ mg/kg Method Reference .... ~"~fL~C, mg/kg Antimony '7040 1 ._ '500. Arsenic 7061 1 .. 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500.- Lead (-) Z.§ 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 · Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 .1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 0il & Grease 22. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080. 1 TOX '9020 1 Comment: A.Ii contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW ~46, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. ~ot~¥ ~ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK ~ Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 117 "V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87 Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2975 Attention: Kenneth Clark Sampl~ Description: B-3-2 @ 10' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian Title 22 Total Metals~ mt/kg Method Reference TTLC~ mt/kg Antimony' 7060 '1 .. .500. ' Arsenic 7061 1 500. : Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium .210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead (-) 2.5 7421 1 1000. .Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 '2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 '2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 0il & 'Grease~ 24. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB ' s 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: All contaminants reported above are in mt/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 LABORATORIES, INC. -- LABORATORIES. Ir'ID. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. ~T#O~O¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 117 "V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87~ Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2974 Attention: Kenneth Cl ark TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample~Description: 8-3-1 @ 5' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian Title 22 Total Metals, ~g/kg Method Reference TTLC, mg/kg Antimony , 7040 "'~1 500. 500. Arsenic 7061 1 Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 . 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2' 2500. Lead (-) Z.5 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 Sulfides 9030 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease (-) 20. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080 i TOX 9020 1 Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (we~) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 'B C LABORATORIES, INC. 1 J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. flTROL~¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFI~D,'.;ALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported:' 02/24/87 117 "V" Street Date Recetyed: 02/19/87 Bakersfield,.California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2973 Attention: Kenneth C1 ark - ~ TOTAL EXT~CT CONtAMiNaNTS BY AC~ D~G~ST~0N .? Sample Description: B-2-3 @ 15' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian Title 22 · . Total Metals, .mg/kg Method Reference TTLC, mg/kg Antimony 7040 1. .500. Arsenic 7061 1 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000, Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead (-) 2,5 7421 1 1000. Mercury , 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420,1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340,2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 0il & Grease 20. pH 9040 ~ 1 Pensky-Marteus Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C L~kBORATORI",~$, INC. fl ., i' .ABORATORIES, Inc. J. J. EGLIN, RE. CHEM. ENGR. ~r#oz~¥ 4100 PIERCE.RD., 8AKERSFI~D, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 I. BSK &'Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 l17."V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87 BakerSfi.eldl, Califormia 93304 Laboratory No.: 2971 Attention: Kenneth Clark . t"-' : TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACED DIGESTION l' Sample Description: B-2-1 @ 5' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian . ' ... Title 22 [' .Total Metals, mg/kg Method Reference TTL~, mg/kg i._ ~ Antimony 7040 1 " 500. Arsenic 7061 I 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. ~ Beryllium 210.1 2 75.- Cadmium 7130 1 100. t. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead 3.3 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 0il & Grease 24. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Ppint 1010 1 PCB's 8080 TOX 9020 Comment: All contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample ,subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW'846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. ~ J.J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGE. PETROLEU¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 I" 117 "V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87 ! Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2972 · Attention: Kenneth Clark i {. TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION "' ~/'-' Sample Description: B-2-2 @ 10' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian ~' ~ Title 22 ~". I' Total Metals, mg/kg Method Reference TTLC~ ~g/kg ~ .Antimony . 7040 ".'1 500. .~. Arsenic 7061 I 500. ~! Barium 7080 1 10000. . Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. ' Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt e 291.1 2 8000. ' , Copper 220.1 2 2500. :l .Lead (-) 2.5 7421 1 1000. ~ ~ Mercury 7471 1 , 20. ..i Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. '~ Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease 64. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's .. 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwisa stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. LABORATORIES. IFiC. J. J. EGLIN, REG, CHEM. ENGR. PETNOL£1J¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 ttV. 117 Street Date Received: 02/19/87 Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2970 Attention: Kenneth Clark .. TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample Descrip~ion: · B-l-3 @ 15' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian Title 22 Total Metals~ mg/kg Method Reference TTLC~ m~/kg Amtimony '- 7040 1' 500. Arsenic 7061 1 500. Barium 7080 1 10000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000'. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead 2.5 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 259.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluoride s 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease 32. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB ' s 8080 1 TOX 9020 1 Comment: All contaminants reported ffbove are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 LABORATORIES, INC. A $1~I~IJ L TU R E LABORATORIES. Inc. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. PE~OL£U~ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 117 "V" Street ' Date Received: 02/19/87 Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2969 Attention: Kenneth Clark TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION ,. Sampi~ Description: B-l-2 @ 10' 02/19/87 Bakersfield Californian Title 22 Total Metals,.mg/kg Method Reference TTLC, mg/kg Antimony .' 7040 "".'~ .- ' 500. .. Arsenic 7061 .'1 500. Barium 7080 1 I0000. Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead (-) 2.5 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 ' 2 2400. Zinc .289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2' 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease 34. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Marten$ Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080 1 TOX 9020 Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg.(unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represemt to=als (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods. for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 LABORATORIES, INC. :qATORIES, InC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM, ENGR. ~T#0ZfU¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 BSK & Associates, Inc. Date Reported: 02/24/87 '.- : ~ 117 "V" Street Date Received: 02/19/87 ., . .... · · . Bakersfield, California 93304 Laboratory No.: 2968 ' Attention: Kenneth Clark TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION i ~ Sample Descr±ption: B-l-1 @ -.5' 02/19/87 Bakersfield ~Calif°rnianTitle 22 : Total Metals mg/k~ Method Reference TTLC~ m~/k~ Antimony . · 7040 I 7o61 -.. t Barium 7080 1 10000..~ · Beryllium 210.1 2 75. Cadmium 7130 1 100. Chromium 7190 1 2500. Cobalt 291.1 2 8000. Copper 220.1 2 2500. Lead 2.9 7421 1 1000. Mercury 7471 1 20. Molybdenum 246.1 2 3500. Nickel 7520 1 2000. Selenium 7741 1 100. Silver 7760 1 500. Thallium 279.1 2 700. Vanadium 286.1 2 2400. Zinc 289.1 2 5000. Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 ~ Fluorides 340.2 2 ~ Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 ~. 0il & Grease 42. :i pH 9040 1 " Pensky-Martens'Flash Point 1010 1 .~ PCB's 8080 1 ~-' TOX 9020 1 Comment: All contaminant~ reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an 'as received (wet) sample basis. .Results reported represent totals (~TLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". · (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD- ' ' Station Sample No. of Analysis Nu~er Designation Grab. Containers Re~ui red by: ignature) Date/Time ~quishe( Received by: (Signature)' Date~ ~me g )nature) Dater ime gnature) e by: Date/T'ime pment: Dist. ribut~on: 0~:~ - ^¢¢ompany Shipment x 33GG Bakersfield, C,nh~'ornia 9338.5 (805) '32_5-5555 April 21, 1987 Mr. ~im Tucker The Bakersfield g~lifornian 17'07 Eye Bakersfield, C:'. 03301 Re: Soil Con~a~:~;~ated tvith ~'~aste, Oil Dear Mr. This letter is to inform you Petroleum ~aste, Inc. has the appropriate permits for and will accept the ~aste identified above. Should any significant changes occur in this specific waste stream from the time the test data and/or predisposal samples ~ere submitted, please contact Martanna Buoni prior to shipping. Ne have assigned the following Waste Identification Number to this waste: M132 This number ~ust be ~ritten on the manifest accompanying each load of waste. Place this ID number in Section ~5 of the California Hazardous ~aste ~anifest. V~ry truly yours, ~arianna Buon! MB:go ~ OeDartment ot Heattn .Services :;t . *: ~. ,--~h a~;:~ and Welfare A Toxic Sul~stances Control Division ~.! .~...: ~::: :~ : p~. {Porm designed for uae ~ ~lte (12.pitch) ~pewrlter.) SacrAmento. California  ........ ~ ~ ~ge 1 Intonation in the ~nao~ a;eas I ~ U,~,,~I HAZARDOUS 1.Generato~'sUSEPAIDNo. ~ment N~ Is not require~ by Federal ~ '-' WASTE ~IANIFEST ' ' 3. G~n-:rator's Name and Mailing Address t ~l NumD~ 4. ~ or~ 5. Transpomer 1 Compan~ ~-~.,~:~z ~t' · YE[LOW TSDFSENDSTHI$COPYTOG~NE~ATO~' WITHIN30~A $~Y ' Department of Health Se~ices State of Callfornta--HeM[h .~ ".. (,, Toxic Substances Control Division Please pi'Iht or ~, (Fo;m '~ ~,~:,:::.~ ', ,~ '.... ,::; eh;:, t l2.pitcfl) ~w~ter.) ~cramento. California UNIFORM HAZ.~,[~CC:~S 1, Generator's US EPA ID NO. I Man.ie~t . D~ument No, Is not r~ulred by Federal 3. G~emto~s Name and M~Hi~g ~',.::dre~s ~ Sta~ ~Jfeal ~ment Num~ T ~" ~' "' Califo~ian ' .-~: 1707 Eye" -,, ,'. . ~.. .t .... , ~.0. ~ox440 Bakersfie!~, '~~ . .~.~,~.~ _ ~. :.,. ,~.,, ,.~.~ ...... ~, T~s~er I Comply N~e [ ~ EPA I0 Num0er C~ O,T~s~ ' . ~. Tr~er 2 Comfy Name ~ ,~. ~_ ~ EPA iQ N~m~r ~signat~ Facility N~e and Site Address - 10,. - - ~AIO Numar ~ ~. US DO~ ~escrt~tlo, fl~cludl, g Pm~er Shipping Name' Hazam Class, ~ I~ Num~O ' __ Ou~ti~ ...... . - . ....... ..... ~'.~z~'~r.~ous ?~.t,~ Solid, ~.O.S.~:''' ''~ ~' "~' .... ~'"'-~ "~ . ~:.-~ ':~ . . ..,--: .' ...?~..' A D. : ' ,, ' '..,-~, "i, J. A(~dltionaJ Descriptions for MstefJaJs Usted Above:..: ~n~y~ Name i ~g~tum' JAMES G. TUCKER Director of Operations March 25, 1987 Bill Scheide Environmental Health Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program Kern County Department of Public Health 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA 93305 RE:~I The Bakersfield Californian Parking Lot Southwest .. Corner of l?th and Eye Street Bakersfield, CA SUBJECT: Soil Contamination/Oil and Srease REFERENCE: BSK & Associates assessment of soil contamination 'report dated March 6, Dear Mr. Scheide: Per the meeting you had with Henry C°il and Bill Bieber of Tilden- Coil Constructors Inc., our construction managers, on March 1987 we request you review the BSK & Associates report and a decision of "No Action" be taken as to the finding of the referenced report, for the following reasons; a) The three fuel tanks were removed by McNabb Construction, for the owner, of their own free will to Clean-up an existing condition. b) The owner has new fuel tanks per present day codes at the · new production facility. c) Now that the three fuel tanks have been removed the owner will construct a new parking lot with landscaping on the corner per City codes. This not only provides off street parking but enhances this downtown street corner. d) Per page 6 of the BSK report as the tanks were being ~emoved soil samples were taken and tested. The oil tank (the two other tanks were gasoline) soil tested 14,520 ppm at 2' below center of the tank, and 92 ppm at 6'. ?~-TH~~~ soil was removed and disposed cf per e) What the report doesn't tell you or make clear is that the badly contaminated--~bll.having-beeh'"-~e~0v~d~ the excavation was back-filled and compacted to grade. The area was then re-tested per the three borings as noted in the report and the findings were as noted on page 6. The~test results were all under 50 ppm except for the one at 64 ppm, and your guideline is lO00 ppm. From this the level of Contamination is insignificant. P.O. BOX 440 (1707 "EYE" STREET) · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 · (805) 395-7215 · ) The'cost to go back and re-excavate the ~ormer oil' tank is some $~,000.00 plus, (see at~ached)'£1am ~-~-~? quote. The situation does not warrant this typ'~ o~ expenditUre since the exposure is so iow. g) The report says on page 4 that the ground water level is greater of lO0 feet, per the Kern County Water Agency. Therefore there is little or no problem with ground water contamination. Conclusion: .-~" Since there is no ground water intrusion or contamination, and~the concentration range produced by the tests indicate "non- hazardous" conditions, we request no further action be required. Respectfully Submitted, cc: Tilden-Coil Constructors Inc. BSK & Associates P.O. BOX 440 (1707 "EYE" STREET) · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 · (805) 395-7215 Tractor Rental .' C.H."Buss" ELAM Bakersfield, California 93308 Phone (805) 589-9533 ' "" - .,: .. .. , ~!..'<-" ~,.: .... :-..,: · , . , -. ,.. . .. _'-* .:~,.i. : · .-'.... .... . . ~.. -,- _ · . '- *.~ ..... .' . . . :-".'- . - .: ~ -.. ~,~. March 13, 1987. :' :!.:..'- " " ''' . . -Jan Hefner... :* .. .- .''.Purchasing Manager ' -- . '" .-.. · . · -:..- , . . . .',....· · . . ~.~-~ '. """ .:' ".-~.P.~o. Box 440 '. ' .:...,..'..*'.. .t .~.:,'-_"',.. '~'-".:." ':--, "~* '"" : -' ' "::'r" ::*!':*'~- ~: ' . , . . .... ~ .... Dear Ms. Hefner. . ... - ~ . · . *.:......¥*: ..... --. .. ...... ,' ' ~- -.', -' ~. '~' -' ' -~'. "'* "* ....: '-'~* ~ .' ,'.***'.:-~. * : *' ~-'.'~ ~"'" i'(] :' ':;:'* "'.'?<< '*"' ', *' '"','.. :*:'~.,-'...~ ':- ,.' ' ' * .: "*:'.':'~'~:~.'. '. ' ...' :'.. !-.J. 4'.'-~'.--.;~-~.,in' reply to your 1;etter Of March '9',. 1987 ~equest?ng-our ~JotJ"on. removal 'of' flazard~us './~=.~':V.:J;%~d~S . "'."'L j:. '~"'~ '[.~F']~i. y-*?.FWaste Material from the site of .17th and Eye Streets in the City"'6f Bakersfi'eld CA we " ':': -4' ' ~,~'.t~"~'.' *;(-*"'~ ~ ' " .... · ' * - - ........... . ............ - ...... ~ ..... · .~.: ' ,: _. ~:;-".~..~.;.:u-xL~'.respec~ully submt our quote as follows: '.~,.".'~'..*.'.~;~:*',.~:: *",. ,.,'~'.;~,,-,~.i.--~;~'. :q~<x~-.~:~,:..,'> . ~", *' :'. ' ..' ~ ~ ":*:~f;~ :-~ ..... -:?~.~ '~.'4. ~ .,~,,,-,.~ _.~. .::..,.: ~x .-.<.,:. ,.. · .,¥:~b: .-~ :. : ,>,...?_1~:;.~?~,.~;.=-~:r~.*% ?,'.F:.::/: m~ximum. Lump Sum of $19,424.00 dollars. -__ Any excavation requ~red, over 450 ~ons or are~ specified above, ~11 be charged · off ~ $50.00 pet ~on ~nd ~11 be based on ~anifes~s from ~eigh~ ~icke~s from ~he "' '' Hazardous ~as~e Dump. A $664.00 price is included in ~he above figure for demolition and removal of existing concrete slab. AC paving removal only in ~he 20' X 20' work The Bakersfield Californian is ~o pay dump fees a~ ~he Hazardous ~s~e Dump and provide ~ny permits which may be required. Thank you fo~ your consideration in ~h~s bid m~e~. Yours very truly, ELAM TRACTOR RENTAL Estimator GC/jf .." STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES *** HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER REGIS~ATTOM NAME AND ADDRESS OF REGISTERED HAULER: "Elam Tractor Rental 2920 Wear Street · BakerSfield, CA 93308 HAULER REGISTRATION NO.: 0316 :~ 'EXPIRATION DATE: September- 30, '1987 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FIRM NAMED ABOVE IS DULY REGIS- ' '"' TERED TO HAUL HAZARDOUS WASTE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS 0F CHAPTER 6.5, DIVISION 20 '0F THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE AND CHAPTER 30, DIVISION 4, TITLE 22 0F THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) LICENSE NUMB[RI ''IS'SUE DATE , EFF'ECTIVI: DATE EXPIRATION DATE: .... ~ ' I~/ ' } 0~.A..,.~.. 0. C,,-,.o..,A ",0.,¥A¥ ...ROL 37717 2/87." 4/25/87' 4/30/88 ~ NON-TRANSFERABLE LICENSE c.. CA.".ER cA- 56 : :,. .i,~..:/~ [] ,ni.i., ILq~Rene.~a,' ~ICENS[[ NAME AND ADDRESS (ONLY IF DIFFERENT FROM ~[LOW) The ~rson or firm named has ~e~ licen~d put.ant to the California Vehicle Code for: OPERATION OF: ,"J:.* '~ , .-* **:* ' , ' ~ Emer~ncy '' *.'~moYe~'" ~"::~.~ ..... (iMS) Inspection and HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION ~ {HMX) ~xplo~ive~ ~ubject to Division 14, Vehicle'Code. Materials subject ~ ~ to Section 31302, Vehicle Code, and other hazardous ~ Elam ~z:acto]: Rental z 2920 Wez~ S tz:ee t ~HMO) Othe¢ Haza;dou's Malerial~. o ~ Bake~s ~ ~ eld ~ CA 9 3 30 8 IHMWl Hazardou~ matedal~ in certiiied waste h.uler vehicle~ ~ ~ ~ only (fee exempt); registration numar: CHP 360 {Rev 9-85) OPI 063 . · .,..,.t ,.,~.[_ .5~/~. ;~.~ ,,,.....,,...~ ·: . - - .. .... ', ~ '. .... . r: ,...,.; .~',~., -;.,. ,~...... ,. ~.. .. .. ,....~.., .- ,:.~,~ . ~..' . ,.. ,::.. ,. :'. <,..L;: :.-':;. ;' .;, ,. .),,..:,:.:~,. ~:~/~,,~.~,~,.::~.~: , &EPA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY This is to acknowledge that you haw~ filed a Notificatioh of Hazardous Waste Activity for ' the installation located at the address shown in the box below to comply with Section 3010 ' of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRAL Your EPA Identification Number for that installation aPpears in the box below. The EpA Identification Number must be ' '.~. included on all shipping manifests for transporting hazardous wastes; on all Annual .: ' ~ports that gendrators of hazardous waste, and owners and operators of hazardous waste -. 'treatment, s~rage and disposal facilihes must file with EPA; on all applications for a Federal Hazardous Waste Permit; and other hazardous waste management reports and documents required under Subtitle C of RCRA ..................................... ~..~:~ . ..... .... . .: -.- . · .. . ,..,.~,.,%- -;~f ; · .~ . . .. · ~ . ~ -- :.~ ' : . . ,~. -..· ~..~.:~ : ::'(' .-~ ...,.-: .... ;.:..;.~ :-.,:. :-... ~: .?.',~ },: ..'~:',;~ ... 1 EPA Fo~ 8700-12A (440) . Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. Wesley I. Braun, CE John R. Hedley, CF James G. Sutton, CE John H. Kirk, CEG Robert O. Skaggs, CE John B. Moore, CE Alex Y. Eskandari, CE Thomas E. Vahlstrom, Ch Hugo Kevorkian, CE John M. Minney, CE February 9, 1987 .. .. PROPOSAL BP87008 " Bakersfield~ California 93302 .," '. SUBJECT Assessment of Soil A: Che request of Ms. Hefner, we have prepared :his proposal ~o ,.respond to the letter (see attachment) from ~he Kern County .'~.-.:, . ...... ....: Health Department (K.C.~.D.), regarding contamination at 1707 8tree~ ~n Bakersfield, California. ~he proposal"~s prepared for .... the eont~nuod assessment of the so~l contamination.caused b7 the · - waste otl rank on ~he north side of the property, designated as . Tank ~5 It is based upon our discussion with Mr. Scheide 'of K.C.H.D. ' Project Information It is our understanding that the property was an old gas station site. The gas station was probably constructed in the 1940's by ARCO. The station was purchased by The Bakersfield Californian in 1971, and was leased out and used as a service station from 1971 to 1979. The station was converted into parking and loading areas around 1980. The subject tank was located at the northwest corner of the property. The tank was installed with the construction of the gas station and had not been used since the station was converted to parking. Through the years of usage, spent oil and chemical solvents may have been discharged into the tank. The tank, made of Steel, was about 4 feet in d'iameter, 4 feet long and buried with 3 feet of soil cover. The tank was removed on January 19, 1987. Soil Engineering * Engineering Geology * Engineering Laboratories * Chemical Laboratories []' Fresno, California 93706 * 1414 Stanislaus Street * Telephone (209) 485-8310 [] Visalia, California 93278 · 3901 So. Mooney Blvd., P.O. Box 3236 * (209) 732-8857 ~] Bakersfield, CaJifornia 93304 * 117 "V" Street * Telephone (805) 327-0671 ~] Pleasanton, California 94566 * 5729-G Sonoma Drive * Telephone (415) 462-4000 Proposal ~OPOSAL BP87008 Assessment of ~ Contamination ~bruary 9, 1987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 2 1707 Eye St.~eet Bakersfield, California Previous Work Following the tank removal, soil samples from depths of 2 and 6 feet below the tank were obtained and tested for contamination at B.C. Laboratories in Ba.kersfield, California. The test results indicate that the sample taken at 2 feet has an oil and grease concentration of 14,520 mg/kg. The sample taken at 6 feet'has an oil and grease concentration of 92 mg/kg. These results are included in Appendix A and summarized in Table 1. -.~ ~. -" '(by B.C. Laboratories on 1-15-87) · -~-?...~: ?:.:.':' :..- ..... . ..... .~. BTX* ---~'i':' .TPH* .- '.~'TOX** --.~:.-:..:Oil and Grease .:- .'"-": '-¥'-."Sample Depth ':(m~/k~) :-':":'(mg/kg): "' (rog/kg) ..... '(rog/k§). ' .... :::'],i~i.:;~?: ,'~- '.i .:..' ~ · ..... "· ' -' ~-i .q ....... . . _...:.: .'..' .... ~ 2 ft. N.D. N.D. -20 14,520 fi ft. N.D. N.D. -20 92 I * Detection Limit' 0.1 rog/kg .. : ' '-'-~ · N.D. - Non-detected ' ' · * "--" leSS =hah To assess the lateral extent of soil contamination, K.C.H.D. has requested further testing. Soil and Groundwater Conditions Based on the drilling we have performed for other pro'jeers in the vicinity of the site, the soils at the tank site likely consist of silty sand and sand. These soils are classified as recent alluvial and fan deposits derived from the Kern Canyon to the east. Information published by Kern County Water Agency indicates that the groundwater elevation in this area is at a depth greater than 100 feet. Proposed Work We propose a field expldration program of 3 borings to be drilled in the tank excavation vicinity. Approximate test hole locations are shown in Figure I. The borings, located about 10 feet from the cente= of the former tank, .would provide an indication of the lateral extent of contamination. BSK & Associates Proposal elOPOSAL BP87008 Assessment of Soil Contamination February 9, 1987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 3 1707 Eye Str~'et Bakersfield, California The test borings would be drilled with a truck-mounted continuous auger drill rig. Prior to test hole drilling, we request that plans be provided to us that clearly and accurately show existing underground utilities or structures. We will not be responsible for damage to underground improvements not accurately shown on 'these plans . The bottom of the tank was at about 7 feet below the existing .grade. Testing on the sample obtained 6 feet beneath the-tank ...... ., resulted in low concentrations of oil and grease and ........ = '..-_.'~,: ...... non-detectable levels of TPH, BTX and'TOX concentrations., Per ",'-'..'. "" . Mr. Scheide's request, soil samples would be obtained at depths , :' of 5, 10 and 15 feet in each test hole to be drilled. The soil -samples would be tested by B.C. Laboratories for the presence .... of..,.. · '."''[)'oil and grease and lead.'.'An additional test hole Would be -~.~':: ...... ...... "!'r":'"drilled at the former tank location to assess the .~ertical'extent "'"'of contamination if the 15 foot samples from the Perimeter holes are contaminated. The drilling wOuld'be performed with a truck-mounted drill rig using 8" hollow stem augers. The augers act as continuously .[..'-,:'.'.,:i'.,.. advancing steel casings preventing test holes from caving-in : above the levels to be sampled. The samples would be obtained 'by lowering a 2.5 inch inside diameter sampler containing four stainless steel liners, inside'the hollow stem auger, and driving it into undisturbed soils. ....' The sampler would be steam cleaned between sampling activities, and the hollow stem augers would be steam cleaned between test holes to prevent cross contamination. The drill crew would consist of a driller and a helper. Field supervision would be provided by a geotechnical engineer who is responsible for the field boring logs, recording of field conditions, soil sample handling and preservation, .chain of Custody and the field equipment cleaning process. Samples would be collected, intact, in an undisturbed Condition in stainless steel liners. The samples would be capped with aluminum foil, then with pressure fitted plastic caps and then sealed with adhesive tape. Each of the samples would be labeled with an adhesive-backed label including boring designation, depth of sample, and initials of the individual preparing the sample. The samples would be stored in ice chests and delivered to BC Laboratories for testing. It is understood that cuttings resulting from borings would be stockpiled at the site and eventually disposed of by the owner. The holes would be backfilled to the ground surface with a cement slurry containing 7 sacks of Portland Cement per cubic yard. BSK &Associates Proposal ~ IOPOSAL BP87008 Assessment of S Contamination ~bruary 9, 1987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 4 1707 Eye Street Bakersfi.eld~ California Following the completion of laboratory chemical testing, a report would be prepared describing our work and presenting our findings and clean-up procedures acceptable to the K..C.H.D. The estimated fees for performing three borings and corresponding soil testing are attached for your review. The additional boring and soil testing, if necessary, would be at additional costs. The opportunity to submit this proposal is appreciated. We will be."glad to discuss any questions concerning this proposal Civil Engineer/ JBM/rlg ...'~ BSK & Associates Proposal ~OPOSAL BP87008 AssesSment of ~ Contamination ~ruary 9, 1987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 5 1707 Eye' Str. eet Bakersfield', California ESTIMATED FEES Field Investigation Drill Rig, Equipment and Operator: 4 hrs. at $80.00/hr. $ 320.00 Field Soil Sampling ..... ~. · · and Supervision 4 hrs. at $75.00/hr. 300.00 Steam Cleaner Rental :..-/...: 1 day at $85.00/day > '"'" 85.00 ·"~ " cement Slurry' - LUMP SUM ~ 200.00 Oil. and 6tease 9 ~amPZe~ a~ $20.00]ea. $ 180. To~al Lead . 9 samples at $37.00/ea 333.00 Re~ort Preparation Geotechnical Evaluation and Report Preparation 8 hrs. at $75.00/hr. $ 600.00 Drafting 2 hrs. at $35.00/hr. 70.00 Clerical & Printing LUMP SUM 150.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE 2,238.00 .BSK & ~ssociates (;eotechiHcal Consultants, In(:. ~,,, ....~o.~,,,.,,.~i~k.~~ ~, February 9, 1987 PROPOSAL BP8.7008 The Bakersfield Californian eost Office Box 440 _~ . Bakersfield, California 93302 _~ ~ssessment of Soil Contamination' Underground Waste Oil Tank ~.~ 1707 Eye Street : ~ . ~__~- l".."-'~]:"'"]: ~'. Bakersfield, California Gen t lemen: At the request of Ms. Hefner, we have prepared this proposal to respond to the le:ter (see a:tachment) from the Kern County. Health Department (K.C.H.D.), regarding contamination at 1707 Eye Street in Bakersfield, California. The proposal is prepared for the continued asse~sment of the soil contamination caused by the waste oil tank on the north side of. the property, designate~ as Tank f~5. It is based upon our discussion with Mr. Scheide of K.C.H.D. Pro~ect Information It is our understanding that the property was an old gas stati'on site. The gas stagion was probably constructed in the 1940's by ARCO. The station was purchased by The Bakersfield Californian in 1971, and was leased out and used as a service station from 1971 to 1979. The station was converted into parking and loading areas around 1980. The subject tank was located at the northwest corner of the property. The tank was installed with the construction of the gas station and had not been used since [he station was converted to p'arking. Through the years of usage, spent oil and chemical solvents may have been discharged into the tank. The .tank, made of steel, was about 4 feet in diameter, 4 feet long and buried with 3 feet of soil cover. The tank was removed on January 19, 1987. <,~dl iln~.,m,,,~ring · Engi.eering ecology · I~ngmk~ermg [.ahorator~cs · ('h,mHcal . , vitalis. C~llit~rnia 93271~ ]901 So. Moo.er Bird:, P.O. Box 3236 (2()9i 732-~57 ' Proposal ( OPOSAL g?87008 Assessment of Soil Contamination 'e'ebr~aary 9, i 987 Underground ~'aste Oil Tank Pa~e 2 1707 Eye.. St'feet Bakersfield, California Previous Work Following the tank removal~, soil samples from depths of 2 and 6 feet below the tank were obtained and tested for contamination at B.C. Laboratories in Bakersfield, California. The test results indicate that the .sam. ple taken at 2 feet has an oil and grease concentration of 14,520 mg/kg. The sample taken at 6 feet has an oil and grease concentration of 92 mg/kg. These results are included in Appendix A and summarized' in Table 1. ' TABLE I TEST RESULTS (.by B.C. Laboratories on 1-15-87) BTX· TPH* TOX~*. ~-Oil and Grease Sample Depth (m~/k~)~ ' '(mg/kg) (m§/k~) (m~/kg) ' :" .. 2 ft. N.D. N.D. -20 i4,520 6 ft. N.D. N.D. -20 92 · Detection Limit: .O.1 mg/kg N.D. -' Non-detected · * "-" less than To assess th~ lateral extent of soil contamination, K.C.H.D. has requested further testing. Soil and Groundwater Conditions Based on the drilling we have performed for other projects in the vicinity of the site, the soils at the tank site likely consist' of silty sand and sand. 'These soils are classified as recent alluvial and fan deposits derived from the Kern Canyon to the east. Information published by Kern County Water Agency indicates that the groundwater elevation in this area is at a depth greater than 100 feet.. Proposed Work We propose a field explo~ration .program of._.~, borings to be drilled in the tank excavation vicinity, Approximate test hole locations are shown in Figure 1. The borings, located about 10 feet fr'om the' center of the former tank, would provide' an indication of 'the lateral extent of contamination Proposal OSA1, BP87008 Assessmeut of S Contamination ruary 9, 1987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 3 ~ 1707 Eye Str.e'et Bake rs fie l.d', California The test borings would be drilled with a truck-mounted continuous auger drill rig. Prior to t~est hole drilling, we request that plans be provided to us that clearly and accurately show existing underground utilities or structures. We will not be responsible for damage to und~erground improvements not accurately shown on these plans. The bottom of the tank was at about 7 feet below the existing grade. Testing on the sample obtained 6 feet beneath the tank resulted in low concentrations of oil and grease and n~n~detectable levels of TPH, BTX and TOX concentrations. Per Mr. Scheide's request, soil samples would be obtained at depths of 5, I0 and 15 feet in each test hole to be drilled. The soil samples would ~be tested by B.C. Laboratories for the presence of oil and 'grease and lead. An additional test· hole would be drilled at the former tank location to assess~ the'.verticai extent of contamination if the 15 foot samples from the perimeter holes The drilling would be performed with a truck-mounted drill rig using 8" hollow stem augers. The augers act.:as continuously advancing steel casings preventing test holes, from, caving-in.. above the levels to be .sampled. The samples'w~61d be obtained by lowering a 2.5 inch inside diameter sampler _con~aining fo'~r stainless steel liaers, inside the ho!!ow's-t'em auger, and driving it into undisturbed soils. The 'sampler ~culd be steam cleaned between sampling activities, and the hollow stem.augers would be steam cleaned between test holes to prevent cross contamination. The drill crew would co~nsist of a driller and a helper. Field supervision would be provided by a geotechnical engineer who is responsible for the field boring logs, recording of field conditions, soil sample handling and preservation, chain of Custody and the field equipment cleaning process. Samples would be collected intact, in an undisturbed condition in stainless steel liners. The samples would be capped with aluminum foil, then with pressure fitted plastic caps and then sealed with adhesive tape. Each of the samples would be labeled with an adhesive-backed label including boring designation, depth of sample, and initials of the individual preparing 'the sample. .... ~-he-.samples woul-d be stored in ice chests and delivered to BC Laboratories for testing. It is understood that cuttings resulting from borings would be stockpiled at the site and eventually disposed of by the owner. The holes would be bac'kfilled to the ground Surface with a cement slurry'containing 7 sacks of Portland Cement per cubic yard. BSK ' P~',,posa ! POSAE BP87006 As~ess-:ment Of S Contaminani. on bruary 9, [987 Underground Waste Oil Tank Page 4 1707 Eye St-ge'et Bakersfield, California Following the completion of .laboratory chemical testing, a report would be prepared describing our work and presenting our findings and clean-up procedures acceptable to the K.C.H.D. The estimated fees for performing thre.? borings and corresponding soil testing are attached for your review. The additional, boring .and soil testing, if necessary, would be at additional costs. The...-opportunity to submit this proposal is appreciated. We will be~glad to discuss ffny questions concerning this proposal. Respectfully submitted, /John B. Moore,~r. Civil Engineerl JBM/rlg . Enclosure BSK ~7~mo .... S~r,,e, COUNTY .~E.~LTH D=PARTME Bakersfield, California 93305 L~cc M Hober~son, Telephone (~5)~161-3636 £NVIRONMEN~L HEATH DIVISION · .. - ' .~~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL · ' ' /2~~ Vcrnon S. Re~herd January 26, 1987 The Bakersfi~'ld Californian · '~. 0. Box 4~0 '. Bakersfield, California 9330~ i. Attn: Jan Hefner o .. '- .. Dear Ms Hefner: '~: ". This department has reviewed the lab analysis for the five underground storage tanks ~emoved at the dow~tow~ facility on ~?07 Eye Street, Permit #A340- 16. The samples indicate no significant contamination present ~nderneath tanks #1 through ~4. Those four ta~.ab~do~ents are complete.'.:~Howeve~ the waste o~i tank (tank ~5.) on the`: nOrth"~'~':e~d of the property has co'ntamlnation and re~i=es a site characteF~zat~.on.. ../..,.~...jl.~ .~..~u..~;w~ Per our telephone conversation ~..'of-January 21, 198~, ~hls department requests further exploration to f~nd the full lateral and vertical extent of the contamination. THis can be accomplished by exploratory borings outside the perimeter of the tank hole. A proposal must be submitted to the Kern County Health Department and approved prior to exploration. The work mus't be planned and di=ected by an approved envtro~ental assessment contractor. You have 30 days to submit the proposal to th~s office for approval. To help you with developing this proposal, I have included a copy of the Site characterization p~oposal outline. Use Jt as a guide proposal. In this case, there is Some evidence to suggest the pl~e of contamination ts shallow. You still must find the lateral extent as well as p~ove that the full depth Is less than 10 - 12 feet as ~ndlcated by the soil analysis. Once you have found the full extent of contamination, be prepared to propose a method of disposal or treatment for the contaminated soil. We can discuss those options at a later date. Sincerely, Bti1 8chelde Environmental Health Speclallst Haxardous ~atertals ~ana~ement EnClosure PETgOLEU~I _._~ · i . 14lAIN'OFFICE: 4100 PtERCE ROAD, ~AKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics <SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIE~b, CA. 93305 LAB No.:-396 Sample Description: NORTH WASTE OIL ~6' ..... DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS " SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB: , ~OMPLETED:?-{:';t,:,~.' ' ..... '~"Mi'nimum Reporting Analyses .. ' .Report,lng. Constituent Units Results Level- Benzene Hg/g none detected ".;~'i~"~;'::'i~0.1'0 Toluene Hg/g ' '.-- none ~tected .. ,.L..'... O.10 Ethyl 8enzen~ Hg/g none detected 0.10 p-X¥1ene ~g/g none detected 0.10 im-X¥1ene ~g/g . . none detected 0,I0 o-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isopropy1 Benzene Fg/g 'none detected 0.!0 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g no~e detected 5,00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.50 · ' Oil & Grease: 92. mg/kg ~- TOX: (-) 20. mg/kg "~ EPA 5020/80~5/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-} refers .to "less than". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbo_ns present (Cf to C~O) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are .in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleuc hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or gceater than any othe~ constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlocinated] constituents on this ~epoct. A~a 1 ys t RECEIVED (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2~1~ STARK STREET REPORT:l-l~-83 BAKERSFIELD, CA. ~3305 LA~ No. :3~5 Sample Description: NORTH WASTE OIL ~2' " - DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPL~ COLLECTED: RECEIVED ~ LAB: " '~:~.~..COMPLETED.:..~?~' Minimum Reporting Analyses . Repot ~1,ng Const i tuent Uni ts Resul ts Leal Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 · . Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0. i0 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene Ng/g none detected O. i0 o-Xv 1 ere. ' ~g/g none detected O. Isopcopyl Benzene Ng/g none detected Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 0.50 (-) 20. EPA 5020/8015/8020: DRY bIATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) ~e~e~s to "!ess than". PETROLEUM HYDROCAROONs: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. By ..... _~ ............ Analyst BP87008 N> ' Fe b~-uary, 1987 · FIGURE l Scale: 1" = ~'0' - 17th Street - Concrete Sidewalk ~-~ ~/--Approximate Location _ .. Existing ' I~ for Former Waste ......... .'::-::::.:..'i~i:..'-. .... ]-2 ' ' ,2 ~Ap~rox~ma~e Exeava~o~ BoundrY. / ..... . ~ LEGEND SiTE PLAN · . ~ Approximate Location Assessment of Soil.Contamination for proposed Bori'ng .:-. 17th Street and Eye Street Bakersfield, California & Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS-,,~-o. ~^,,...,...~.,,,~ !' .: "::.':"':" ' . 17~ Flower Street ~ERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME HEAL~ OFFICER Bakersfield, Cali~rnia 93305 ~on M Hebe~on, M.D. .- ENVIRONMEN~L HEAL~ DIVISION ~lephone (805) 861-3~6 . · . ' ' .. DIRE~OR OF EN~RONMEN~L HEAL~ ~rnon ~ R~chard 3anuary 26, 1987 The Bakersf£eld Californian P. O. Box 440 . Bakersfield, California 93302 Attn: San Hefner Purchasing Agent Dear Ms. Hefner: This department has reviewed the lab analysis for the five underground storage tanks removed at the downtown facility on 1707 Eye Street, Permit #A340- 16. The samples indicate no significant contamination present underneath tanks #1 through #4. Those four tank abandonments are complete. However the waste oil tank (tank #5) on the north end of the property has contamination and requires a site characterization. Per our telephone conversation of January 21, 1987, this department requests further exploration to find the full lateral and vertical extent of the contamination. This can be accomplished by exploratory borings outside the perimeter of the tank hole. A proposal must be submitted to the Kern County Health Department and approved prior to explOration. The work must be planned and directed by an approved environmental assessment contractor. You have 30 days to submit the proposal to this office for approval. To help you with developing this proposal, I have included a copy of the site characterization proposal outline. Use it as a guide in preparing your proposal. In this case, there is some evidence to suggest the plume of contamination is shallow. You still must find the lateral extent as well as prove that the full depth is less than 10 - 12 feet as indicated by the soil analysis. Once you have found the full extent of contamination, be prepared to propose a 'method of disposal or treatment for the contaminated soil. We can discuss those options at a later date. Sincerely, Bill Schetde Environmental Health Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program BS:sw Enclosure OlS~l~ OFFICES Delano . Lamont . Lake Isabella Mojave Ridgecres! . Shafter ~ft J. J. EGUK, REG. C~EM. ENG,. MAIN OFFICe: 411)0 PIE~C~ ~OAD. ~AKE~SFIE~D. ~A. g3308 PHONE 327-~11 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2616 STARK'STREET REPORT:i-19-8-; BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LA~ No.:395 Sample Description: NORTH WASTE OIL 82' DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: ' COMPLETED: Minimom Report lng Analyses Repor¢~.ng Const i tuent Uni ts Resul ts Level Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.I0 Toluene Hg/g none detected Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected O. i0 p-X¥1ene Wg/g none detected O. m-Xy!ene Hg/g none detected O. 10 o-X¥1ene ~g/g none detected O. !0 Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected O. 10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 14520. mg/kg TOX: (-) 20. rog/kg EPA 502o/8o15'/8o8o: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) refers to "less th~n". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons oresent (C1 to C80) utilizing~ a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on th~s report. Pet,~oleum hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents On this report. ASRi~'TJL 7TJEE j. J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. ENGR. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAK£RSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of .8616 STARK STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIEpD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:396 Sample Description: NORTH WASTE OIL DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: ., COMPLETED: · 1-11-87 1-i8-87 !-15-87 M i'n i mum Repo r't ing Aha 1 yses Repot ~,i ng Constituent Units Resul ts Level Benzene Hg/g none detected O. I0 Toluene Hg/g none detected O. 10 Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected O. iO p-Xylene Hg/g none detected O. i0 m-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene Wg/g none detected O.lO Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected O. 10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum HYdrOcarbons Hg/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 92. mg/kg :~* , TOX: (-) 20. rog/kg '* ~ EPA 5080/8015/8020: D~Y MATTEF~ BASIS COMMENTS: (-) refers ~.to "less than". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C80) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleu~ hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on th'is report. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:3~? Sample DeScription:;G~SOLINE EAST @2' ' DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: Minimum Reporting Analyses Repg~%ing Constituent Units Results Leve~ Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.~0 Toluene Hg/g none detected 0'.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.I© p-Xylene ~g/g none detected m-Xylene ~g/g none detected O.lO o-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.I0 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g no~e detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 64. mg/kg EPA 50~0/8015/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS ~' COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C~O) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this'report. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be less than~ equal to~ or greate? than any o~her constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. -- - Analyst U CH; I ; AN, AZ YS; I NC. · '. J. J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. . PETROLEUM MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:i-19-8? .... BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 LAB ~o.:3~8 Sample Description: GASOLINE EAST ~6 DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: Minimum Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Leve! Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.~ Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.I0 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.I0 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g 'none detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g n~ne detected 0.50 oil & Grease: 40. mg/kg EPA 50~0/8015/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS "~ COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present <C1 to C20) utilizing a 'gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleu, hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or gre~ter than any other constituent. TOTAL 'PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. Analyst a_ . BORATORI INC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 8616 STARK~STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIEL'D, CA. 93305 LAB No.:399 .. · DATE' DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: ? ' COMPLETED:: '-. '.-','. :,~:,',~ 'Minimum Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected O.iO Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.i0 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected o-Xylene ~g/g none detected O.lO Isopropyl. Benzene ~g/g none detected O.lO Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g n~ne detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Pg/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 68. mg/kg EPA 5020/8015/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (Cl to C80) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this repo¢t. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or qreater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report.~ J. J. EGLIN. REG. CHEM. ENGR. ~TROLEU~ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327.4911 McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. .Date of 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:i-I~-8? -' '..' BAKERSFIELd', CA 93305 LAB No ':400 DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS · SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED · LAB: ·COMPLETED: .'."r.~'i:'~i'~:.''. Mi~{~um Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Lev~t Benzene Hg/g· none detected Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected p-Xylene Hg/g none detected m-Xylene Hg/g none detected o-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected' ©.I0 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g nooe detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons' ~g/g none detected Oil & Grease: 80. mq/kg ~' EPA 50~0/8015/8020: DRY MATTE~ BASIS COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification'o~ volatile hydrocarbons present (C! to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in aOdition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be tess than, equal to, or greater than any othe,- constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The Sum total of ail [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. Analyst CHEMICAL A~L ]~t~ ' 8ORATOR S J. J. EGLIN, ~EG. CHEM. ENGL ~TROLEUM MAIN OFFtCE: 4~00 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE Purgeable Aromatics '. (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of " 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:i-I~-8? BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:qO.1 Sample Description: GASOLINE WEST @2' ..: DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: · " Minimum Reporting Analyses Re~orting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected O.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected O.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected O.10 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected O.10 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 92.' mg/kg EPA 5020/8015/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS "~ COMMENTS: ~ETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarOons present (C1 to CBO) utilizing' a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum, hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. .LABORATORIES J J EGLIN IIEG CHEM ENGI~ I~CTROL£U~I MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeable Aromatics .- - McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of ' 8616 STARK;STREET REPORT:i--i'~LS? BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:402 '- :.,' Sample Description: GASOLINE WEST @~' ' ' '~-:" '- DATE DATE SAMPLE ...-DATE SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: Mi-nimum Reporting Analyses Report'ing Lev~'l Constituent Units Results Benzene Hg/g none detected ' 0.10 Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene Wg/g none detected O.tO p-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 84. mg/kg '~/- EPA 5020/8015/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (Cf to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Pet~oleu~ hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of ail [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. LABoRATO J J EGLIN REG CHEM ENGR ~TROLEUM MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 ~ Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:k03 Sample Description: WESTSIDE DIESEL 82' '. DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS , '- SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: '" ':.'"-,"i.. · 1-11-87 1-12-87 .' .. ..l~ 15-87 Minil~um Repot t ing Analyses Repot t*ing Constituent Units Resul ts Level Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.I0 Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene pg/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene Wg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropy! Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected ~0.50 Oil & Grease: 176. mg/kg EPA 5020/8015/8020: D~Y MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: · -~ PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be !ess than, equal to, Or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-ch!orinated]. constituents on this report. By , __ Analyst A$1fI~L TIJI~ ~ ~ J.J. EGLIN.. REG. CHEM. ENGL P~T~IOL~II MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of . 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:l-19-8? BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:AOA Sample Description: WESTSIDE DIESEL 86' '-".-'. DATE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED: M i q ~um Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent 'Units Results Level Benzene wg/g none detected O.E'O Toluene Hg/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10' o-Xylene 'Hg/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected 0.I0 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g n~ne detected 0.50 Oil & Grease 84. mg/kg EPA 5020/80!5/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS -'; COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleur' hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any'other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. INC. MAIN OFFI6£: 4100 PlERG£ ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, OA..g3308 PHONE 327.491 ' Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL,) · McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC, Date of : ,' 8818 STAR~. STREET REPORT:I-Ig-8? BAKERSFIELD~ CA. 93305 LAB No.:~05 .' , Sample Description: MIDDLE WEST OIL @8' '.~ DATE, , DATE SAMPLE . DATE ANALYSIS. SAMPLE COLLECTED: ' RECEIVED ~ LAB: , ~., . COMPLETED: I-I 1-87 i-l~-8? " ' · .-.tLr5-8? -'ii:;,';". -:. -- Minimum Reporting Analyses Reporting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 p-Xylene pg/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected O.lO o-Xylene pg/g none detected O.lO 'Isopropyl Benzene Hg/g none detected O.tO Petroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g nope detected 5.00 Total ~etroleum Hydrocarbons Hg/g none detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: i40. mg/kg ~;- TOX: (-) 20. mg/kg "~ EPA 5020/8015/80~0: DRY MATTER ~ASIS COMMENTS: (-) refers to "less than". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C80) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleu hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of ail [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. J J EGLIN REG CHEM ENGR PETROLEU¥ ~ . MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA, 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeab le Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION INC. Date of · ,-~/,].~.-"'.}~.. DATE DATE SAMPLE ,~ "' DATE ANALYSIS SAMPLE. COLLECTED: 8ECE I VED · LAB: COMPLETED: ~ '~:~],'].'" ' Mini~m Repot t lng Analyses Repo&~t lng Constituent Units ~esuits ,, Level Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0..10 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene ~g/g none detected O. 10 o,X~lene ~g/e none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g nb.he detected 0.10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g ~one detected 0.50 Oil & Grease: 160. mg/kg ~X: (-) 20. rog/kg ~: EPA 50~0/80~5-/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) .refers to "less than". PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline standard. Petroleum Hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Petroleum hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any constituent. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non--chlorinateO] · constituents on this report. Analyst : .~ .. MAIN OFFIC~ 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327M$1 Purgeabie Aromatics .~- (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION Date of ~. 2616 STARK STREET REPORT:I-I~-8? ~'~" ~ BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93305 LAB No.:476 Sample Description: CALIFORNIA AVE. PROPERTY, 2' ISLAND - . .¥._ _ . DATE DATE SAMPLE ~' 'DATE ANALYSIS~'?~ SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEI.VED · LAB: COMPLETED:.- .... 1-1~-87 1-13-87 1-16-87 , Minimum Reporting Analyses Repo~ting Constituent Units Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.!0 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 m-×ylene ~g/g none detected 0.I0 o-Xy!ene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected O.lO Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.50 ~one detected 0.I0 Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g ...~ Oil & Grease, mg/kg: (-) 20. T.O.X., mg/kg: (-) 20. EPA 50~0/80~O: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) refers to "less than". VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less t'han, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, or the combined total. TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated constituents on this report. ...... Analyst Ctt£MI~.,41 ,ANA~J~ ' '... · INC.. J J EGLIN. lEG CXEM ~ROL~M ~ MAIN OFFIC~ 4~00 PI[RC~ RO~D, BAKERSFIELD CA. ~3306 PHONE 327-49.11 Purgeable Aromatics " : .' .~?.'.-:..-',~ ' ~;.~...-. (SOIL) ~cNABB CONSTRUCTION Date of " - . .. .' ... ~. > .~..,'~ 86~6 STARK STREET REPORT:i-1~-8? ' · BAKERSFIELD, CA. ~3305 LAB No. :A~ ..' ..,." ' Sample Description: CALIFORNIA AVE. PROPERTY, ~' ISLAND " . : --;~?".":,., . _ :~ ,;;~. DATE ":.~ " DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS'" .'~. SAMPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED ~ LAB: ., ' COMPLETED: ~"L~'~; .... Minimum Repot t ing Ana 1 yses Repor t lng Lev~i Const i tuent Uni ts Resul ts Benzene H~/g none detected O.iO Toluene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Ethyl Benzene ~g/g none detected O. 10 p-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 m-Xylene Hg/g none detected 0.10 o-Xylene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected 0.10 Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected 0.50 Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ~g/g none detected O.IO ~.0.~. ~ m~: (~) 20. EPA 50~0/80~0: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: (-) 'refers to "less ~h~". VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a Benzene Factor. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. Total volatile hydrocarbon values may be less than, equal to, or greater than any other constituent, or the combined total. TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all non-chlorinated constituents on this report. ~-- Analyst 17OO Flower Street RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME HEALTH OFFICER Bakersfield, California 93305 Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION - .... " · ' = ' :*'*: * :" '~i: ~' / '~ '*, '- 'DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS AS POLLO~S= 1. permtttee must obtain~ a Fire Department permit prior to tnlttatl'ng abandonment action. 2. All procedures used must be in accordance ~tth requirements of the standards and guidelines developed for the Implementation of Kern Count7 Ordinance Code. 3. The 8,000-gallon unleaded tank must have samples retrieved one-third from each end of the tank at t~o and six feet depths. ' These samples must be analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene, and total volatile hydrocarbons; 4. The t~o 1,000-gallon diesel tanks and the t~o 5,000-gallon ~aste oll tanks must have samples retrieved from beneath each tank center .at t~o and six feet depths. 5. The. diesel tanks' samples must be analyzed for .total petroleum hTdrocaebons and benzene. O. lank ~1 ~a~te oil tank) ~a~ple~ ~ust bo anal~zod fo~ oil and ~rea~e, total halogenated h~drocarbons, and benzene. 7. Tank .5 (~aste otl tank) samples must be analyzed for oil and grease and total halogenated hydrocarbons. ' 8. A ~tnl~u~ of t~o samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately t~o and six feet for every 15 linear feet of Pipe run. One set of samples · ust be taken underneath each pr.oduct dispenser at the prescribed depths. 9. Each product piping run ~tll be analyzed for the sa~e constituents as that. of its tank. 10. Advise this office' of the tl~e and date of propoSed sampling ~tth 24 1700 Flower Street, B.~kersfield,n CA% 93305 No. of Tanks to ~ Abar{dohed APPLICATION FOR. 'PERMIT FOR TEMPO~ OR PERMANenT Tv~e of ADolication (Fill Out One Application Per' Facilitv). A. Project Con~act (~)e, ~ea ~e, phone): ~s O~ ~~ Nign~ -~O--'/~. ~rk?'s C~nsation CertifffdaY~6n- ~ ~ ~ Insurer Pro~s~ St~rti~ ~te ~~ ~ pro~s~ C~pletion ~te ~rker s C~ation C~f~fica{ion ~ - ~ Insurer D. Ch~ical C~sition of Materials Stor~ .... Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~ercial name) ' Dates Stored Chemical Previously ~tored / ._ __' ~a~ory,T~t ~1 Perf~ ~yses of~nples ~;e' ~ 'F. This application for: . emov~i or ~a:~ndo~ent in pla~ * * PL~E ~OVlDE INFO~TION REQUESTED ~ ~E SIDE OF ~IS SHE~ B~ORE SU~IT~I~ APPLI~TION ~R ~. This form has ~en c~pleted ~der ~nalty of ~rjury and to ~e ~st of my ~owl~ge is trtm '.~)d corr~ ' prov,hte ~asc~'tptlon ot Pny:~ ~ ~Tncation ot ran~L~ , r ~ = .... :-- ~roximate ~,Pro~s~ s~pling Locatlo~ lnalcanu~J /of Samples .." . or intersection · Scale Agpr ovea. ~ ~endod Permit Conditions ,' ~permtt kppttcation ~orm, ~ ~ Tank S~eets, .Plo+ ~Corre~ndence - g~iled Da Uflauthofii~ Releale Reports ......... NVF C~plianee Check (NeY ~ona[~c[i~n ChecE'l~t) ~S~ C~pliinoe Check (Ney Conat~uc[ion Checkl/lt) ONvr plan Check (Ney Construction) ~BTD Plan Check (Ney Construct/on) ~HV~ Plan Check (~xlsting Facility)  B~ Plan Cheek (.Exlsti~ ~acill~y) ~ Incomplete Application.  Pe~mlt lnltruct leal ~Dilclrded fightfle~ Teat ReoulCe ~ ~Ce ...... Da Ce - ~aoflttori~ Nell Cons~ructi'~n Oa'~l/PermlC8 ....... 8 Oround~Cer Drilling, Boring Logs Location o~ ~aCer Nails ~Statemeflt of Underground Conduits ~Plot Plan ~eaCurinq All gnviro~en~ally Seneitive Da~a ' ~flalf sheet shoving date ~eceived and tally o~ nspectton time ~c ~ ~Niscel laneous ' -"~ ~ 1700 Flower Street RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM HEALTH OFFICER t Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertso~, M.D. .'-.. ..j. Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ,. , . '~**. '*' .'* '. ~ :/.'i ~" ,~.~,,:.: ?' ,, "-* ~ {. DIRECTOR OF ~NVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ' -*' '" /~ ' "" '" '" VernonS. Reichard '.ir': ::::::.:,:;:!:~ .... HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES~..?~=~][~..~i~.-- ' '/~':':~J'~i:::~":::::" ' ',.'::"-'~ - 7.~" ";~; .......... ~-- .... -- ...... A ~; · ' ' '- ':~' '" ~":~'?'~'~' ~"~' '-'~'~?:' ""~'"~'"~ '~':'~'":~;~ · ' -:: ,~.~ '~,~:.~,~ FAC I L I TY: :~.~, ~'~.': ~-~:~ '.:. ~, ~-; :~ ~ ~: ~,~?:~ >: :~ ~. ~.:~ ~.~ :~ -'~, ~' '. '~ ~.'::?'~':ff:?~'~}'~:::~ DOWN TOWN ~USn' FACILITY :'~?~{~:~::~;:;~j,~ ~ ~, :gAD .,..,.CA .>,,.~,~:.,.,:~:,~.~./::~ ~,,~:~ ?NOTE: Ar.L ,. , .'...::: ,.~...':"..?.. ..-,. ,: {-..', -~ ,,,.: DATE P55~4IT miT,m: AUG g 5 1986 DA~E PERblIT CH~K LIST ~: · .... Date: 9-22-86 :" ' To- Kern County Health Department .. ,..,., .... Subject: StandardInventory Startup '"'. . '" ' , Procedure " · , .,',, ','. On the enclosed checklist there are two items · Item E, one of the four tanks that are located ' ',... .... , at the facility(tank #4) is being considered " for removal. It is' a 500 gallon tank that I - do not have a calibration chart for. We are waiting for information from your office .o~ tank removal procedures. If you need any information please call,me at 395-7435. " Larry Arnt Fleet Maintenance Supervisor PERMIT CHECKLIST .Facility jO10' ~'~' ~' ~O. ~' Permit # I~) I.~- This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided .... within' 30 ' days. :of receip~ ;~-.::~z_~:. '. '::: -.--~-~:~:-'~'~_:~---~--:: = .-~-~-:::~:-~._:-~ ~.::~_--~. ~.-..::- v: ~:.:' ~_~. :~:: .... · ......... Check: Yes No A. The packet I received contained: 1) Cover Letter, 'Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase I Interi~ Permit ....................................... - .... -:Moni~ori-ng :.~Requirements ~--='=~tnf. ormat;i-on.~Sheet~--- .(~Agreemen~ ..... Between-~;Owner~-=and Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-3941), Explanation of Substance .Codes, Equipment Lists and Return Envelope. 2)Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook SilT-10. 3)The Following Forms: a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse  c) Trend Analysis Worksheet 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) ~ B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring ~ Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C.I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument ~ 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) ~- 3) Water-finding paste ~ D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). ~ E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-lC, all meters at this facility have had calibration checks within the last $0 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman --if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook). G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures described in Handbook #UT-lC. ........ [ ................................... Date--~S tarred ......... SE P-T-EMB E R- 2,-~--. 19 8~--~ .... $iKnature of Person Completin~ Checklist: .~ ,~_ _ LARRY 2. RHT Title: FLEET t.IAIi~TEI~A;;{ E SUPERVISOR Date: SEPT. 22, . 1986 ' Permit # 160019 :...... 1675 Ey_e ~Street ..,~ ..,,....,... ;,:i..'.,'~.,,.., .. ,~ Bakers fi el d.,..·.Ca. --..".' .... ~ 'y.~ . /';..,.7..i~..:~.: .::...;..., .~...,..,. .... ., -, ~. .-.,: ;-,,, .:,~ ,~,~...~,:~.,. -,. , · · ',.' %,'"- , ~.:''o,-,.. ,',-,' .... . ..... .'m:~ .... - ' ' ' ,~¢ ',- ~ .·';'.'~;, ~.2'.':,'":'-~ , .'-'·"',';"~ ~'.':.' ',~",2: .:.'. ,'., ,,r. 22,~':-.qj~,"~.· $-.','~ :~'J - ~ ' °';'. · '" .... '~"'":;. ,' ';;;,' ~ .............. · ...... _~.,.. ;.,.'~: 'c,-.-. ~.'LV',.'--":.'- ['-.: ,': .;.'.:~:-,;"~*"~,;'~'.;;;'~ .'.:,~.~L';.'.o. ;~,~...-;,'~".,..~'.'".'--.'.~.?' ? ,., .. ; :, ;. · ..~ a~..~l[.~.?..:,..:z. ~,=,' ;~..- .... :.;>, .. -:,:...-'.;::r.~ ,.:,.. ;, :..;:,:~-. :.,. .,.. y,~-..:.-. ,.,.. :?....,.,~:.~;^:;,... :~ .~r.:~,-.~:..-...~.;-j,: ,.% ~.;,.- q.- ~.. ~ : ,. ..,,.....,.# ~.~ ... ,..:._.... - · · . :._ · ...._ .- ,. ..... ...,~...... ,~__ . ". ..... 20o0 . 3000 4000 ] '5ooo 'j '6000 · ". 7500 '. · liooo .'. loooo '[ , .1;~ooo ' :. i ' Depth I 45~'x14~" I ?~ aB & . I. ~ x~.~ I /~ x~/-,, ! ~a ~ ,,I ~ ' , ! ~ , : "431 "" :'. ' ' -: .': --" . _._ -".::., ..~..__.---19 .'~-..,-..,;.'~'~..?. ;..~ :. r. i ."--s- ,:' :' -:'. ·5 .' -8;-:'; i0 , -9 5 :. ~, 2 ' I5 .: '-' :~ '1~,':. '""' 22 'i ' 29-: :. 26. .'.. 32','.:.:.38;" 41~2! ..-,'53.'.'v, 60:... 28 ' i '.: 27 ' 40 '..i.. ' 52-:' .". 48'. .. -.'. 59 ':' '~.'.' '69 :': ";'. 76:w. :'~;',~,: 97.:,'~.;. ., .: 43 :i 41 . 62 81'''~ -.',: 74.:'.. :. ':' 90' ';"I06'"' ,'.; 117 '" .;.: 149--,,-., 170,:..,~ 60' "{, '57',, '.' 86' i'12'. ' 10¢' '., 126 '.:1.48:'-':; i63 .~, :':' 208.';::; :?.237,-'"' ;-.' '99~ ". '·:"~4....: 141" 1.185; '. 171". ' 208 "1 '.~ 244-.':.' ;'-·.260 '-'.i '-' 342-.'.~'['~'.)39I ' ( i ..... t20." '.~--t-lZ, ...... 20¢ ..; .-,,:.,:225' ' ._;...208' · · 253..' 297.;'.: "' 327.'. '". 416.".'...47,6, ': ., 142 "..' .136 '. :- 238 ... 267 . '248 '-' '"'~30i':- .... '"35¢ " '.'.--."--389':' '--'495---'. x . 168 ', 15~: -400..' '311 '.: ~89 '.'35~ I 413' :":: 4-5~.s ,. :qs--'.-::6s~"- ' '" ' "' ;" :. ;. ::.'<75 '.;: :..' 7 .o :' {_ .12 ,. 213.'. 207. · 310 '. 40o': i'..,377::~: ' ,.458~ ,i :539';, '.'.'593'..:{; ..'.'755.. : ·8o3 : · · '455 -'.' ' 424 -: ' 515 ':. "' 606 :': .'~ "667 ;' '"' 848 ",,- · 970 --' 13'.il' 239" 232, . 348 : .'507." :,:'472.'. :.574'. '..'675': ;.".:'742:' '.' 945'.~1 ;1080'.'. 14. .. '265 :' 258 · 387 · -291 -'-~ 285 " 428- 560' 522,; ',' 634. ' '746- ;."'~' 821"..~1.044.~,:'., '1194. '"' ':· :. - ,,,' - - · . ~'6', ~ 318 ' 313; ~69 '~ . 6~,4. 573 ~.. -..;~96 ..819:.. ,.:' 901 :' ~,~4~,.~. · '" ~ " ~' 759 894.' h"983, I'251"; .;1.430 ?..:'17 · 345' . 341 -. 511 ...j 669 .625 .' . '. ' ~ '  "'679.:. ?].i 825 970 ,.:.'1067 ' ' 135a".-:'-t.552 . 373 . 370 5~5 · 725 .. ' : · :..~1 . · · . 401 i' 399 599. 783 · '.734 ..: 891' .1048 '.. 1153 '1~68.'" · · ' : - 790. . 959 -- 1128 · ' ~24I' 157-9'":' 1805.'. a"- 429 4as. 64~I 8~2 ....... · 21 ' :' 457 - 459. · 689 901 -846 .1028- : 1209' .' 1330' '1693 : 1935" 22 - ' · ' 485",' 490' 735 . 962 · 90~' 1098 ·. 1292 ' I421" '180g.~.; .~2067' 23" 514 ',. 521 782 1023. 963". · 1169. 1376' : 1513" '1926'!'.. '2201. : 24 · '542 . ·553 . .830 · 1085 · .1023 ; .. 1242 · 146~' '1607'., 2045¥: .,'2.338 · ; 25 "::.570., 584 -. 878 1148 1083 "1315 1547. 170~ ' ' '2t66 "' ' 2476 I .,' " ' , -.· .... " ~' - .. 26.' '-5'98 ' ,617" .926 l; 1211. 11,~4.' 1389~635: .1798.,. '225~" -56~6:. 27 · 626";' ' 650 975 · 1275~. .'1206.. 1465" .' 1723', ' 1896' -.2413'· ":'27.57'.'. 28. 654; ,' 683 "1024..', ' 1340 . 1'269,-. . .1541 · ,1813: · '.1994. '' .~538' 2900 - ' ." 29..I · 682~-' "716' ';~1074. 1404,' ,1332 ' ' 1618 ']. 1903 ' 2094... 2665. .;304.5 · ' 30.' ..... 709,. ,..749 · . 1124.1 ' 14.70' :' 13961" ' 1695 ' 1995" "2194, ""2793. ;: .':3192 · '3I ' "735 ' '783 I' "1;1~4 . 1536' 1,461 . .1774 · ':2087.; 2296 . 2922 "3~,39 32 .. .,762 · 816 '1225 .1602;. 1526 "1853 2180;~ '"' · ' ; " " 2398 ~ ~.3052" 3488 ' 33 .' '"" 787 850 · 1276 1668 . '1592.' "' 193.3 2274'..~ .:. 2501 .; ' 3183."'.:: .3638? ' 3¢"'' 81'2 884.. .1327' 1735' 1657/ 2012- .2368:': ii~2604..~ -'.33~5' 3788 ' .;.- 35"' "836 " 918 1378" I802 1724';..- 2093 · "2463".~ 2709';' "3448,' ..... 36".:-" 860"' 952 3.42'9 ':" ~,869" " 17~)1':': '-2174. "2558.;.I '.'~ 2814.'! "?" · 37 .- " 882' · 987 . 1480. ' 1936 '1858 .: 2256 · 265¢'*, ;72920-".~ '371-6,' ~.".4247,.. 38'. .. 904.. 1021 1532 2003' ' 1925 ' 2338 ; 2751,? ~ 3026.' '385'~]' .14401.;" 39 "" 924 1055 '~ 1583 . .2070' 1993 ' · 2420':;. 2848 .' .,"3132':' '.3987 ... '~556". ,o,0 944.. 1089 1634. ' ,' 2137 "2061' .'~ .";2503-" .. 2945' , 3239:i" ':..';4.123,." 41 961 1123 1685. I '.2244 ..2128 'i 2584 .; :. 304.0 · :~";3344". 4256': ,'""A36~. -- 42"' ' 977; ' ' 1158 ' '1736i .2271 . '2198 '~ 2669 . 3140:. .:.3454'..: . &397 ;:; ,' ,5025 . -3 ........ c~91 ..... 1191 -. 1787 . ' 2,3.37; 2267 ' '2753 . 13239 .3562'.".i-'4534.;' -"5.18~ . ' 1003 1225 1838 ' 2~0~ 2336"': ' =2S36 '..3337.~.,." 3670. ~; '~-.4672-.. .,5339 '. 1011 ' i ·1259' 1839 2470'..' ..... 2405 ".. ".2920 ,,," 3435,. :']'3779. ..'; ']1.48, I.0'..~ '-54,97.-"'.."I. , i' ' [ " " · ·46' .. ,:. "· i295 ! 2536 ~ 2474 '. 3004. .'353¢-' 3887-". ...49-'$' [. 5'65'5 .-; .'..47 :' . 1307 [ .1961 ; 2564 ':' · ' .... "2543 3088 '.'.3633 · 3996 5q~6 :. o58~2 ~... .. ~ ; .,. ..; 3~72"i ':3731 ; "410&.. · 522~. .5970 48 ' } ,:-' 1359 20~9 266.6 ·2612 . 5,3" · _ ~1 1425 . 2:137 . '2795.'.~." 2750 .3339 · '.' :3929 432~ 55c,~ . i'i 'i September 22, 1986 Larry Arnt Bakersfield Californian P.O~ Box 440 - Bakersfield, CA 93302 Dear Mr. Arnt, ~ · i: Enclosed you will find the abandonment application that you requested for the ltunderground hazardous storage tank located at your downtwon facility. ~. Since you have !received a permit to operate which requires you to begin ~tandard inventory Control .monitoring for this tank you must submit a letter as sOOn as possible .to this department stating that the tank has no metered dispenser and therefore this type of monitoring cannot be performed. i If you would fill out the tank abandonment application and mail it to the Kern County Health Department within 30 days we can begin to process it. !i If you have any questions please call me at 861-3636. Sincere ly, Janis Lehman Environmental Health Specialist I Hazardous Materials Management .Program JL: sw Enclosure DISTRICT OFFICES September 24, 1986 Kern County Health Department 170.0 Flower Street Bakersfield, Ca. 93305 Dear Ms.Lehman, In responce to your letter of 9-22-86 I would like to indi~cate that one of our tanks at our downtown fuel facility (Permit #160019C), tank #4 is a 500 gallon tank used for ad- ditional storage. This is the tank that we are considering for removal. Starting 9-25-86 we will start standard inventory control monitoring at the above location. Tank #4 does not have lines that connect it to either other tanks or to any fuel pumps. We therefore cannot implement fuel monitoring on this tank. Please advise us on an alternate route if we choose not to re- move this tank. Sincerely, Larry Arnt Fleet Service Supervisor P.O. BOX 440 (1707 "EYE" STREET)- BAKERSFIELD, CA 93302 · (805) 395-7500 Kern Count~ Health Dep~rtment Permit No. Divimion o~ Enviro~en~l ~,Heal ~lication D~ March 18 1985 1700 Flo~r Street, Bakermfiel. 93305 ~~US SUBST~CES S~E FACILI~ ~ of Applica6ion (ch~k): ~w Facility ~ification of Facility ~isti~ Facility ~ansfer of ~ership A. ~ergen~ 24-~ur Contact (~e, area c~e, ~one): ~. Terry, Bro~ (805)395-7432 Nigh~ Terry Bro~ (805)861-~903 Facility ~ ~wn To~ Fugl ~acility , _ ~. Of ~ 4 (FOUR) Is T~k(s) ~cat~ on ~ ~ricultural Fa~? ~Y~ Is Tank(s) Us~ ~i~rily for ~ricultural ~r~ses? ~Yes ~acility ~dre~ ,1675 EYE .~ET Nearest Cro~ St. 17~ ST~ET T R SEC (~al ~atio~ ~ly) ~r ~E BA~FIE~ C~IFO~IAN, INC. ~Ct ~r~ Terry Brown ~ress P~.O. Box 440,, ,Bakersfield, CA Z~p 93302 ~le~one (80,5,)395-7432 or ~rator s~ ~n~ct ~r~ Fred ~der ~sis for Soil ~ ~ Gro~ter ~p~ ~temi~tto~ C. Contractor N/A ~ ~ntractor' s ~e ~. ~rker's C~~ti~ Certi~icati~ ~ X~urer Pro~ NONE. E. T~k(S) S~re (~eck all ~t a~ly): T~ ~ ~s~ Pr~uct ~tor Vehicle Unlead~ R~ular Pr~i~ Die~l ~ste F. Ch~t~l ~sltton of ~tertals Stor~ (~t ~ces~ry for ~tor v~tcle f~ls) Transfer of Ownership Date o~r~-ans~er N/A Previous Owner Previous Facility Name I, accept fully all obliqations of Permit No. issued to . I understand that the Permittir~ Anthority may ~eview and modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this t~dergrotmd storage facility upon receiving this completed form. ........... Th'is-'~[~--P~'' ~e~-c~-f~-tg~d~-~'~-~_-~'~~ of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is nners Facility Name : Down Town FUel F~cilit¥ . Permi[ No../~/ TANK ~1 (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FO~CH TANK) --F~R EACH SECTIO~,-~EC--~--ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES H.2.1' ~Tank MaterialiS: [Vaulted ~Non-Vaulted []-]Double-Wall ~]Single-Wall --~Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [~Polyvinyl Chloride [~Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~uinum [] Bronze ~]Unknown [] Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness .(Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer -- ~ ..... 4~ ....~ank SecOndary'- Containment []Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner [~Lined Vault []None ~Unknow~ [-]Other (describe): Manufacturer: ['1Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Linin~ '--~Rubber []Alkyd [']Epoxy ~Phenolic []Glass ~Clay []t~lin~d []Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ............................... ..... --='~ .......... ~"~TGalvanized'~a~2~'=="O~'i~-[h~lene Wrap OVin¥1 Wraming i'l?ar or Asphalt E~Unknown []None []Other (describe) Cathodic Protection: []None []Impressed Current System ~lSacrif~c~al a~ode S~stem bescribe System & Equil~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~, and Interception a. Tank: F'lVisual (vaulted-tanks only) UIGroundwater Monitorin~' Well(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) Fl~ Without Liner U-Tube with C~m. patible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring We.Il(S)* Va~or Detector' [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivity Sensor' [] Pressure Sensor in ~nnular Space of Double Wall Tenk- [] Liquid ~etrieval & Inspection Fr~. U-Tube, Monitoring Well or ~m~lar Space ~-]Daily _Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testing None~ Unkno~i [] Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Pipin9' [']Monitoring Stamp with Race~y · []Sealed Concrete Race~¥ []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner Race,my []No~e [] Unknown [] Other · Describe Make & Model: 8. ~en Tightness Tested? FqYes []NO [~Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing Ccmpany 9. Tank Re,air Tank Repaired? [] Yes [~NO ~b~known Da te (s) of Repair (s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection ~-~Operator Fills, Controls, & visually Monitors Level []Tape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [~Auto Shut- Off Controls ~Capaci~ance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box [-]None []tlnknown Other: List Make & M~del Fc~ Above Devices a. Underground Piping: ~-]Yes ~]No [.']Unknown Material UNKNOwN Thickness (inches) UNKNOWN Diameter UNKNOWNManufacturer UNKNOWN []Pressure ~]Suction []Gravity Approximate Length of 'Pipe [%a~ 18" b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : ....................... [2]Galvanized .... ~TFibergIasS~Clad ~[~]-i~pressed Current '[]Sa~ffficf~I-~Ahode []Polyethylene Wrap [qElectrical Isolation []Vinyl Wrap []Tar or Asphalt ~']Unknown []None []Other (desc. ribe): c. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Contairment: []Double-Wall ~']Synthetic Liner !~stem []None ~-~Unknown []Other (describe): Facility Name : Down Town Fuel Facility Permit No. / TANK ~ 2 (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM ~ TANK) FOR EACH SE~, ~E~ ~ ~PP--~-~RIATE BOXE~ H. 1. Tank is: []VaUlted ~Non-Vaulted [-~Double-Wall [-x]Single-Wall ,, 2. ~ Materi'al ~ []Carbon Steel [2] Stainless Steel []Polyvinyl 'Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel [] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic []Concrete [] Al~inum [] Bronze ~-qUnknown [] Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) caPacity (Gallons) Manufacturer UNKNOWN UNKNOWN .................... :~ .... 8.r.000 :~-.~-.-. UNKNOWN .. ...... -:~-' ':4'~-"-'--Tank Se'condar¥ Containment []Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner []Lined Vault E]None ~Unknown [] Other (descr ibe): Manufacturer: [] Ma te r i al Thickness (Inches) Capaci ty (Gal s.) 5. Tank-'Interior Lining ----E~Rubber E]Alkya []Zp0x¥ E]menolic []Glass []clay []U~ltned E]unkno~ []Other (describe): ..... 6. Tank Corrosion Protection : .......-~ ....... . ....................... .. ......................... ---~]-Galvani Zed · ~as~iad · [] ~1 ye~i~ne wf-a~ -: :~ ~i~--W~ppi~' ........ .. r~Tar or Asphalt E1unknown []None []Other (describe): Cathodic ProteCtion: -[]None E]Xmpressed Current System []Sacrificial i~ode SyStem Describe System & Equipment: ,.' 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring,-and Interce~3tion a. Tank: ~Visual (vaulted tanks only) ~Grou~water Monitoring .Well(--) []Vadose Zone Monitori~ Nell(s) I-]U-Tube Without Liner " []U-Tube with Ccmpatible Liner Directi_n~ Flow to Monitoring We,Il(s)* [] Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor [] Conductivity Sensor [] Pressure Sensor in Annular SPace of Double .Wall Tank- [] Liquid Retrieval & InsPection From U-Tube, Monitoring Wall or Annular Space [] Daily Gauging & Inventory .Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightness Testing [] None[] tmkno~' [] Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for pressurized Piping' []Monitoring S~ap with Receway []sealed Concrete Raceeay []Half-Cut ComPatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~ay []None [] Unknown [] Other · Describe Make & Model: 8. Tank Tiqhtness l~Xs Tank Been Tightness Tested? E]Yes []No r~unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing Ccmpaoy 9. Tank. Reda ~ r Tank Repaired? []Yes E]No ~]Unknown, , Date(s) of RePair(s) Describe RePairs 10. Overfill Protection [~Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel []Tape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves []Auto Shut- Off Controls [~Capaci~ance sensor []sealed Fill Box [']None ~Unknown []Other: List Make & Model Fo~ A~e Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: []Yes [~NO []Unknown Material UNKNOWN Thickness (inches) UNKNOWN Diameter uNKNowN Manufacturer UNKNOWN []Pressure ~]Suction []Gravity ApprOximate Length of Pipe ~ 38' b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : · .............................. E]Ga 1-Q~ ~-i=~- --~[] ~'i~-~l ass-c1 ad []Impressed ~reht .... []Polyethylene Wrap [-]Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wrap [']Tar or Asphalt [~]Unknown []None []Other (describe): c. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Contai~nent: I-]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System [-]None [k-]Unknowri k'aclllty Name: Down Town Fuel facility ~ermin No. TANK ~ 3 ~(FILL OUT SEP~TE ~ ~ T~K) ~R ~ SE~,' ~Z~ ~ ~R~~ . 1. Tank is: ~Vault~ ~Vault~ ~uble-Wall. ~Si~le~all 2. ~ ~terial ~Car~n Stol ' ~ S~inless 'Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~l~ Steel ~ Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~.Concrete ~ ~in~ ~ Bronze ~k~ ~Other (de~ri~) 3. ~ Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~11°~) ~nufacturer ~o~ u~o~ 1 ~ 000 .... . ~-~- '. ~o~ ~le-Wall ~~etic'~ner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ~ufacturer: ~Other (descri~): ~terial Thic~ess (Inc~s) Ca.tity (~ls.) 5. Tank Interior Lini~ ~~r ~k~ ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~Other (de~ri~): ,6. Tank Corrosion Protection ............. = ~- ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~O~er (de~ri~): Ca~ic Prot~tion: ~ne ~pres~ ~rent S~t~ ~crfficl~ ~e ~t~ ~ri~ Syst~ &'~ui~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, a~ Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ t~ o~y) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~Vadose~ Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wi~ut U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow ~ ~nitori~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ld ~el ~n~r* ~Co~tivit~ ~r ~ Pressure Sen~r In ~ular S~ of ~le Wall Tank ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~11 or ~ar ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Re~nciliation ~ri~ic Tigh~e~ Testi~ ~None ~o~ ~er b. Pipit: Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~t~.tor(s) for Pressuriz~ ~nitori~ ~p ~ ~ce~y ~ ~al~ ~crete ~ce~y ~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~t~tic Li~ ~y *~ri~ ~ & ~el: 8. Tank Tightness ~is ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Results of Te~ Test ~e ~sti~ ~ny 9. Tank Re. ir ~ Re~ir~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) , ~ri~ Re. irs 10. ~erfill Protection ~rator Fills, Controls, & Vis~lly Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls ~ci~ance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ & ~el F~ ~e ~ices 11. Pipi~ a. ~dergro~d Pipi~: ~Yes ~ ~o~ ~terial ~o~ Thickne~ (i~hes)~KNOWN Di~eter ~KNOWN~nufacturer UN~O~ ~essure ~tion ~Gravity ~proxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~ 38' b. Undergro~ Pipi~ Corrosi~ Prot~ti~ : ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~le-Wa~l ~thetic Liner System ~ne ~kno~ ............. ~Other~ (de~ri~): Facility Name: Down Town Fuel Facility; Permit No. /~c7 TANK ~ 4 (FILL OUT SEP~TE FO~ ~ T~K) ~R ~ SE~, ~E~ ~ ~RIAT~XE~ H. 1. Tank is: ~Vaul~ ~n-Vau~t~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all 2. ~ Materi'al ~Car~n Stol ~ S~inless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~l~ Steel ~ Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~ ~in~ '~Bronze ~k~ ~ Other (de~ri~) 3. Priory Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca,city (~11o~) ~nufacturer . - ~OWN .......... -' ...... ~OWN . . 500 ~.~-~ .-. ~.- ..... : ~OWN 4. Tank Secondar~ C~nt'ai~nt ........ ~le-Wall ~~etic Liner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~Other (de~ri~): ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~eS's (Inches) Ca,city (~ls.) 5. Tank 'Interior Lini~ ~~r ~k~ ~xy ~enolic. ~Glass ~Clay '~lin~ '~Other (de~ri~): ..... 6.-Tank Corrosion Protection -:. ................... -.-- ....... ....... :=..:~-: ..... - ...... - .................................. . ~Galvaniz~ ~ass~l~ ~l~Yle~ ~ap ~Vinyl ~ami~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Cath~ic Prot~tion: ~ne ~pres~ ~rent S~t~ ~crificial ~e ~t~ ~'ri~ Syst~ & ~ui~ent: 7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, ~d Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (va~t~ ~ o~y) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~Vadose Zone ~ltori~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wi~ut ~ner  U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~ti~ Flow ~ Monitori~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ld ~el ~n~r* ~C~tivit~ ~ ' ' ~ Pressure ~n~r'~ ~ular. S~ ~f ~le ~11 TanX ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~', ~nitori~ ~11 or ~ar ~ ~ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Re~nciliation ~ri~ic T~h~e~ Testi~ ~None ~o~ ~er b. Pipit: Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~t~tor(s) for Pressuriz~ ~ ~nitori~ ~p ~ ~ce~y · ~al~ ~cre~ ~ce~y D~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~ ~t~tic Lin~ ~y ~ U~no~ ~ · ~ri~ ~ & ~ei: 8. Tank Tightness ~is ~ ~en ~gh~ess ~st~? ~Yes · ~ ~o~ ~te of ~st Tightne~ Test Resets of Te~ Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny 9. Tank Re~i r ~ Re~ir~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) ~ri~ Re, irs 10. ~erfill Protecti6n ~rator Fills, Controls, & Vis~lly Monitors ~vel ~Ta~ Fl~t ~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- off Controls ~citance ~r ~al~ Fill ~x ~ne ~o~ ~Other: List ~ & ~el ~ ~e ~ices a. ~dergro~d Pipit:' ~Yes D~ ~o~ ~terial UN~O~ Thtckne~ (i~hes) ~OWN Di~eter ~o~ ~nufacturer ~o~ ~essure ~tion ~Gravity ~proxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~ -0- .. ................ b ...... U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosi~ Proration : ~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rent ~crificial ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~. ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her '(de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary ContaJ~nt: ~l~Wall DS~thetic Liner Syst~ ~ne ~kno~ ~Other (de~ri~): ................... Perm:[ t Quest tonnat re Norma~_, ..... permits are sent to facil'ity Owners but since many '- '-Owners .... live outside 'Kern County, they may choose t~-ha~e the 'permi. ts sent to the OPerators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: ....... :; ' ......... ' ........... i Send All information to 'owner"-ht"the '~ddress listed on invoice (if Owner is different than ' ..... Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator .with pertinent " information). 2. Send all information to Owner at the fOllowing corrected address: 3. Send all information to Operator: o Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit for Owner)...