HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION Ship To: ~//,0~nr/l~/v~'/~C _~aCt~ ~[;/~> Page ' ] o~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY ~CORD
Attn: ~A ([~ ~~. ~oj~t Name: ~ ~ ~ Analysis
~ Site L~ation: ~ ~f~Cl) '
Date: 0 ' / ~?/ ~[ '
~ -i ·
BothWell S~ple Sample T~'~ E ~ ~ Sample Containers
~o. ~o. ~pa ~t~ x~ w~t~! So~ia Othe~ ~ ~] Va. ~o. Xy~ ~
~~',,' Sa~plea S~p~:t ~ Ship,rs Signature:
~ .~ . ,~ Signature Company Date Time
Re~qu~h~ by: / ~ ~
R~eiv~ by:
Re~qubh~ by:
R~eiv~ by:
Sp~ial Ins~cfions / Shipmen~ / H~d~ S~orage R~ukemenm: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
INC:
21 Tec~ology Drive
I~c, Califomia 92718
~e material(s) listed are received for analysis ~d/or ~eatabilky evaluation. A~ ~e ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
conclusion of~e test work, all remaining material(s) will ~ ret~ed to ~e client ~815 Mitchcll Drivc, Suite 103
for eventual disposal at a licens~ facility. Walnut Creek, California 94598
SMC Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology'Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 9-25-91
Date Analysis Completed: 9-25-91
Date of Report : 9-26-91
Attn: Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: Sante Fe
Project ~: 91-172 D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample % ID mq/kq MDL, mq/kq
3588 EX-160-1575 450. ' 5.0
3589 EX-100-160 780. 5.0
3590 EX-100-225 310. 5.0
3591 EX-210-225 350. 5.0
3592 EX-225-160 460. 5.0
Method of Analysis: 418.1
ND = None Detected
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
MDL = Minimum Detection Limit
A~gela Horton
Analytical Chemist
3 ! 55 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To: ~/]jtl~JJ//~.Sv~'/ffL. ~:o/.,t,)'~'~, Page I of ) CHAIN OF CUSTODY ~CORD
Site Locaaon: ~.~P~-~[~l &CP '
Bofin~ell Sample Sample T, ~e ~ ~ Sample Containers
No. No. Depth Date T~e Water Solid Other ~ ~ Vol. No. Type ;Pres Rem~ks
Total Numar of Samples Ship~: Ship~r's Signature:
.~ '~ ~)~' ~ignature. . ~ Company ~/~(/~lDate ~' Time~
Relinquished by:
Rel~quish~ by:
R<eiv~ by:
Re~qu~h~ by:
R<eiv~ by:
Sp<ial lns~ctions / ~hipment / H~d~ Storage R~u~emenB: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~/~~/~ 21Tec~olo~ Drive
I~e, California 92718
~e material(s) listed are re~ived for analysis ~or ~eatability evaluation. At ~e ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
conclusion of ~e test work, all remaining material(s) will ~ ret~ed to ~e client 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
for eventual disposal at a li~nsed facility. Walnut Creek, California 94598
GEOTEST
An Environmental Monitoring Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (213) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744
and Testing Service ~
LABORATORY REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10/14/91
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/14/91
IRVINE, CA 92718 DATE ANALYZED: 10/14/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JIM CARTER CLIENT ID : 91-172D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO. : '92759-01
ANALYSES: 418ol
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY
EPA METHOD 418.1
~A~PLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
~EX 0-75 10' 97 10
EX 75-75 10' 280 10
EXW-25-75 130 10
EXW 125-55 5' 47 10
EXW 0-37.5 5' 1700 10
EXW-5-32.5 6200 10
EX 30-44 5' 1600 10
EX 110-44 5' 230 10
×EXW 15-32.5 5' 280 10
.EX 30-44 6' 74 10
ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection.~///
Analyst: RV Reviewed and Approved:
Ibis report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not
necess'arily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This
veport is submitted fo~ the e>:clusive use of the client to whom it is
ad,~ressed.
GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street GEOTEST
Long Beach, 90615 PROJECT NO:
Telephone:(213) 498-9515 (800)624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE ~tJ[ OC..~ PAGE ~__ OF
PROJECT NAME -~'~Sr~-~- t~,~,~NR~It", ' .... METHODS
ADDR£SS C~ ' ~ uJ
COMMENTS
~ C~T~ TIME ' TIME ~ q~A~~ TIME
~~ O?~ COMMENTS YES I NO
COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY
~ ~t~t~ TIME~ ~IME ~(~ ~ ~0~ TIME c~'~ ,
PRINTED NAME
~ co~.~., co~,~.~ co~,~.~ ~'~'
GEOTEST Post'Office Box90911, Long Beach, California 90809-O911 (213)498-9515 (800)624-5744
An Environmental Monitoring
and Testing Service
LABORATORY REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10/08/91
~1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/08/91
IRVINE, CA 92718 DATE ANALYZED: 10/08/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JIM CARTER CLIENT ID : 91-172D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 9275'3-01
ANALYSES: 418.1
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY ~NFRARED SPECTROMETRY
EPA METHOD 418.1
SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
~'EXW 250-225 5' ND 10
EXW 175-225 5' 57000 10
· EXW -25- 187.5 4' 3900
EXW 100-225 5' 19000 10
vEX 25-187.5 10' 20000 10
-EX 100-187.5 10' .6500. 10
.*EXW 170-225 5' 500 10
,,*EX 175-187.5 10' 6800 10
EX 287.~5-225 10' ND '10
~EX 62.5-225 10' 510 10
ND - Not detected below £ndioated Liait of detection.
AnaLyst: SJ Reviewed and Approved:///~,.~
GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL
GEOTEST ~o~ office Box g0911, Long Beach, California g0~0g-0gll (213)498-g515 (800)624-5744
An Environmental Monitoring
and Testing Service
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10/08/91
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/08/91'
IRVINE, CA 92718 DATE ANALYZED: 10/08/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JI~ CARTER CLIENT ID : 91-172D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92759-01
ANALYSES:' 418.1
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTEMT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY EPA HETHOD
SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT
(mg/kg) {mg/kg)
EX 212.5-225 10' ND 10
'.EX 137.5-225 10° 190 10
£XW-25-200 3' 310 10
' £XW-25-225 5' 22000 10
,EX 140-250 10' 650 10
· EX 65-250 10' 51000 10
EXW 125-250 5' 19000 10
, EXW 160-240 5' 46 10
EXW 75-250 5' 51000 10
ND - Not detected below indicated Limit o~ detection.~///
Analyst: SJ Reviewed and Approved:
/
This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not
necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This
report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is
addressed.
GEOTESTisadivisionofGEOSERVlOES, a Californiacorporation, ORtG~NAL
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street u,-u ~ ,-~ m
Long Beach, 90815 PROJECT NO:
~ Telephone:(213)498-9515(800)624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODYRECORD DATE tOJ61C~l PAGE I OF_~.
PROdE( ,'r NAME~, Irl,~T~ F6 ~, ~ I L U3 ~' METHODS
U.I
SAMPLE[RS SIGNATURE
PRINTEI~ NAME __ ?~r'J~4.~' ~'~ ~.~t.~.-~. ~ ~ ~ SPECIAL HANDLING/coMMENTS
CLIENT pROJECT NO. v¢[ J~' ("7"Y~ a '-. ~: z
PROJECT MANAGER ~. '~' n 'r ~ ~' =o ~ o O
~AMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION I-- I-
~*:~ ~.~ ioo.,/.15'-
lo~
,o, ,,
o RECIEVED ON ICE [ I YF_,E~NO
,
~ ~ ~ ~ COMMENTS YES / NO
TIME PRINTED NAME . TIME TIME
~COM~.~ - COM~.~
./
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street GEOTEST
Long Beach. 90815 PROJECT NO: ~t~-~'~... o
V Telephone:(213)498-9515(800)624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE to'/~J'~l PAGE
PROJECT NAME .~lt~'T,~. ~ ~-~1~.~,1~' METHODS
UJ
ADDRESS ~_~,~ ~-~ ~,~e-~.F.F~-,.~ · ~ m
SAMPLERS SIGNATURE //~. (~ ~ ~
PRINTED NAME __ ~&~ -~. E~ ~ ~ = SPECIAL HANDLIN~
CLIENT PR~ECT NO. ~J~l ~ D - < = ~ COMMENTS
PR~ECT M~GE. ~ ~ ~ m ~
~MPLE NO. DATE TIME LO~TION ~ ~ ~ ~
~o' I ., ~ I--
~o ', ~
~ ~ ~~ TIME ~O~ ~ELI~E~ TIME ~ TIME
PR,NTEDNAME -' PR,NTEDNAaE ~,~ PR,N~E. ~ COMMENTS YES/NO
~m~AmnE ~ SIGNATU~~ sIG~URE ~ ~ '~ .
COMPANY COMPANY % "-
GEOTEST Post Office Box 90911, LongBeach, Californiag0809-0911 (213) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744
An Environmental Monitoring
and Testing Service
LABORATORY REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10~09/91
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/09/91
IRVINE, CA 92718 DATE.ANALYZED: 10/09/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JIM CARTER CLIENT ID : 91-172D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92759-01
ANALYSES: 418.1
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY
EPA M~rHOD 418.1
SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECT~ON LIMIT
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
SP 17-B 1400 10
EX-25-250.10' 1600 10
EXW-30-230 4' ND 10
OM-! ND 10
OM-2 7800 10
SP 18-B 410 10
EX 325-125 10' 190 10.
~,EX 400-125 10' 930 10
ND - Not detected below indicated limit of detection.
Analyst: SJ Reviewed and Approved: //////f
This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not
necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This
report is submitted ~or the e~clusive use o~ the client to whom it is
addressed.
GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street GEOTEST
Long Beach, 90815 . PROJECT I~O: ¢[ Z~G~ -o.~
~ Telephone: (213) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE
PROJECT NAME ~ 1~.l,4~Pr ~ ~,,/ML~IA-~' METHODS
SAMPLERS SIGNATURE [~/~. ~'~ ~ Z
~ ~ SPECIAL HANDLING/
'~'~J; . m COMMENTS
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LO~TION
COMMENTS
COMPANY COMPANY C~AN~, ' , ,
GEOTEST .o~ office Box90911, Long Beach, California 90809-0911 (213)498-g515 (800)624-5744
An Environmental Monitoring
and Testing Service
LABORATORY REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10/10/91
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/10/91
~RVINE, CA 92718 DATE ANALYZED: 10/10/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JIM CARTER CLIENT ID : 9L-L72D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92759-01
ANALYSES: 418.1
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
&NALYS[S OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY
EPA METHOD 418.~
SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
~EXW-25-250 4' ND 10
!~ EXW 430-180 5' 160 10
EXW 400-215 5' 95 10
EXW 325-225 5' ~ 270 10
.... EXW 400-225 5' ND 10
- EX 200-112.5 10' 3300 10
~£X 275-112.5 10' 310 10
~EX-25-112.5 5' 72 10
',EX 50-112.5 10' 24000 10
~EXW 410-70 4' ND 10
~ EX 425 -94 6' 78 10
~XW 450-94 3' 34 10
ND - Not detected below indicated limit
Analyst: SJ Reviewed and Approved:
Report date:
This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not
~ecessari£y apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This
'report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is
addressed.
GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL
~L GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street GEOTEST c~ ~ ~L.~ cl. -O t
Long Beach, 90815 PROJECTNO:
Telephone:(213)498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE tO IF~[fll PAGE _..L OF
PROJEC3' NAME .S~T~t ~. ~./~ t[.~31~/ METHODS
REFERENCE uJ = -
SAMPLERS SIGNATURE //~/~ J/7 ( ~ ~ u3~u LU~ =_~ ~o= COMMENTS/
~ ~ CONTAINER TYPE
PROJECT MANAGER /' ~ 'r ~ o,~ ~
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION I-- I-- ~ ~o> -.~
O RE.~NOUISHED By~'~ ~I ~/~ 'oD~TI I t'O~.;~ U RELINQUISHED BY DATE t~ TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS
SIGN.~_URE- ,l~/~l i SiGYNATURE/~ SIG,^~ ~ SAMPLE CONDITION~.~.~
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME ~r~. ,~.~" PRINTE~ ~ RECEIVED ON ICE
OOMPANy/ , / //./ CO P*" OOMPA.¥ SPEC'AL S"'PME"T'HA"OL'.
~R ~/ED ' IoI~T~'(O/~! ~:! RECEIVED BY DATE :GN UR~~ r;! JiEC~I~/~ B~ ~L-)AB)~/(/~ OR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS:
PRINTED NA~E "' ~ TIME TIME
"'" Jm~ GEOTEST
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street PROJECT NO: c:~
Long Beach, 90815
PAGE_~ OF ~
Telephone: (213) 498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE
PROJECT NAME .~PrH'rR F'~_., ~'.AiL,.},q-y METHODS
REFERENCE ,. uj_- --
~ ~u ~ z COMMENTS/
S^M.LERSS~GNATURE ~*.-* 'H- ~ O,~ ~ ~a ~ CO.TA,.E. TV.E
PROJECT MANAGER. / ~ :c ~o ~ ~.~
PRINTEb NAME ~ ' ' -- PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
cOMpANY coMpANY
comPaR~ . COmPaNY ,, ..... y~-~ .....
--G---~O TEST Post Office Box 90911, Long Beach, California 901309-0911 (213)498-9515 (800)624-5744
An Environmental Monitoring
and Testing Service
LABORATOR~ REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DATE SAMPLED : 10/11/91
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DATE RECEIVED: 10/11/91
IRVINE, CA 92718 DATE ANALYZED: 10/11/91
SAMPLE MATRIX: SOIL
ATTENTION: JIM CARTER CLIENT ID : 91-172D
GEOTEST PROJECT NO.: 92759-01
ANALYSES: 418.1
PROJECT NAME: SANTA FE RAILWAY
LOCATION: CALIFORNIA STREET
.BAKERSFIELD, CA
ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRY
EPA METHOD 4[8.[
SAMPLE ID RESULTS DETECTION LIMIT
(mo/kg) (mo/kg)
, EX 375-94 8' 370 10
EXW 275-70 4' ND
~EX 300-94 8' ND 10
~EXW 200-65 5' ND 10
, EX 300-90 10' ND 10
~-'EXW 350-70 4' 16 10
~ EX 225-85 10' 9800 10
.. EX 150-80 10' 20000 10
,/£XW 75-40 7' ND 10
This report pertains only to the samples investigated and does not
necessarily apply to other apparently identical or similar materials. This
report is submitted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is
addressed.
GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation. ORIGINAL
iGEOTEST
GEOTEST
3960 E. Gilman Street PROJECT Np:
Long Beach. 90815
Teleph0ne:(213)498-9515 (800) 624-5744 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD DATE I° h~ PAGE I'_OF I ,.
PROJECT NAME .~,1~ I~'F/~ ~ ~ '~RIL~ ~ METHODS
REFERENCE m ~
~ CONTAINER TYPE
CLIENT PROJECT NO. O ~ ~ [ w
PR~ECT MANAGER ~ ~ o ~ ~
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME LOCATION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~T T~NSmRTER
~O~ ~. ~~~ TIME ~1~ TIME PRINTED~ ~ TIME RECEIVED ON ICE
~~~/~m ~/&'' J~/~ ~T~ CHAINOFCUSTODYSEAL
"~EDZ/~~IG~'URE , 'r~ . RECEIVED BY ~ DATE --~*~"'RE~EIVED~('~). .~~ OR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS:
PRINTED NAME i/
COMPANY - COMPANY ,, C~PAN~ " , ,,,
SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Attention: Mr. Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received : 9-26-91
Date Analysis Completed: 9-27-91
Date of Report : 9-30-91
Project Name: Santa Fe
Project ~ : 91-172 D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL LEAD
Sample ~ ID uqm/qm MRL,uqm/gm
3621 LEX-SP1 210. 10.
3622 LEX-SP2 150. 10.
3623 LEX-SP3 210. 10.
3624 LEX-SP4 110. 10.
3625 LEX-Ii0-88 120. 10.
3626 LEX-ii5-64 20. 10.
3627 LEX-35-55 43. 10.
3628 LEX-15-82 93. 10.
3629 LEXW-50-95 140. 10.
3630 LEXW-115-45 ND 10.
3631 LEXW-100-110 160. 10.
3632 LEXW-65-325 8.8 10.
3633 LEXW-20-45 8.7 10.
3634 LEXW-130-85 300. 10.
Method of Analysis: 3050/7420
MRL = Minimum Reporting Level
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = none detected
e~a Horton
Analytical Chemist
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 ° (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
.... CUSTODY REC, ORD , , ,
Ship To: r~.//,'$tQVAag--,v.r,l.t. 't-7~-L,~T'.,.I,~ Page ] _o£ { CHAI~'OF
Site Location: ~)~ ['1 g~ _. ,
Bofin~ell Sample Sample T' ~e ~ ~ Sample Containers ~ .. '
No. No. Depth Date Time i o
Water Solid Other ~ ~ Vol. No. Type Pres
~.~-~31. Sample~ S~p~] ~' ' '
To~l Number o?, Ship~r's Signature:
Signature Company Date T~e
.
Relinquished by: ,, . -,
R~eived by:
Re~nquish~ by:
R~eiv~ by: -.-
~ial Ins~ctions / Shipment / H~d~ Storage R~u~emen~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS~ INC.
' 21 Tec~olo~ Drive
I~e, California 92718
~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
: material(s) lisled are re~ived for analysis ~d/or ~eatabili~y evaluation. At ~e 2815 Milchcll Drive, Suite 103
clhsion of ~e test work, all remaining material(s) will ~ returned to ~e client Walnut Creek, California 94598
wentual disposal at a licensed facility.
SMC Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Attention: Mr. Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received : 9-27-91
Date Analysis Completed: 9-30-91
Date of Report : 10-01-91
Project Name: Santa Fe
Project ~ : 91-172 D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL LEAD
.Sample ~ ID uqm/qm MRL~uqm/gm
3654 LEX 55-60 10. 10.
3655 LEX 85-64 14. 10.
3656 LEX 85-75 23. 10.
3657 LEX SP-5 44. 10.
365'8 LEX 70-75 20. 10.
3659 LEXW 45-64 16. 10.
3660 LEXW 75-85 10. 10.
3661 LEXW 80-44 ND 10.
3662 LEXW 105-75 ND 10.
Method of Analysis: 3050/7420
MRL = Minimum Reporting Level
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = none detected
An~e~e l~H~r t o~n~~
Analytical Chemist
3 ! 55 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 ·(805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
SMC Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: .21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 9-27-91
Date Analysis Completed: 9-30-91
Date of Report : 9-30-91
Attn: MR. Mike Leonard
Project Name: Santa Fe
Project ~ : 91-172 D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ iD ~ mq/kq MDL, mq/k~
3653 EX-450-210 ND 5.0
Method of Analysis: 418.1
ND = None Detected
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
MDL = Minimum Detection Limit
A~g~la Horton
Analytical Chemist
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P,O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
B°fin~ell Sample Sample T',pe
No. No. Depth Date Time Water Solid Other ~ ~ V61. No. :Type Pres Rem~ks
To~l Number of S~ples Ship~: Ship~r's Signature:
Signature Company Date Time
Re~quish~ by:
R~eiv~ by:
Re~qu~h~ by:
R<eiv~ by:
S~ial lnsmctions ] Shipment [ H~d~ Sro,age R~ukemenm: ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Tec~ology Ddve
I~e, California 92718
~e material(s) listed are re~ived for analy~i~ ~d/or ~eatabilily evaluation. At ~e ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
conclusion of ~e test work. all remaining material(s) will ~ returned to ~e client 2815 Mitchell Ddve, Suite 103
for eventual disposal at a li~ns~ facility. Walnut Creek, Cali[omia 94598
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
· 740 East Carnegie Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571
(714) 386-4081
November 20, 1992
- File: 01001857-61
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Environmental Health Services Department
County of Kern
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Ms. Gough:
Reference is made to Santa Fe's remediation of the former shop area (Permit No. 170008)
located near California and Campus Streets in Bakersfield, California.
Enclosed for your review and approval is one copy of the final status report (Closure
Report) for the Bakersfield soil remediation project.
Request early approval to enable Santa Fe to properly grade the site, allowing for proper
drainage prior to seasonal rains.
If questions arise, please contact Mick Hardin at the above telephone number.
Sincerely,
Mick Hardin
Manager Environmental and
Hazardous Materials Control
Enclosure
cc: Messrs. Bill McGinn - San Bernardino (w/o enclosure)
Ivan Owsley - Bakersfield "
Mr. Tim Lassen (w/o enclosure)
Environmental Solutions
21 TechnolOgy Drive
Irvine, CA 92718 ~
11-20 02/ira
A Santa F¢ Pacific Company
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page 1
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-12
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3350 (SOIL) TB-100
TOT;LL coNTAMIN/LNTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 28. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for' Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
41 00 Ar~as Cc. · Bakers~elrl, C~ ~B~3~Ol~ · [5)0b-)~-~7-,491 I · FAX ~ ~7-1 ~11~
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page i
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: i0/08/92
BA/~ERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-11
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: Si~IPLE ID ~3341 (SOIL) TB-88
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 84. ' mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ali above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluatin9 Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 At~as Ct. · B@kersf~elct, CA 93308 · [805) 327~4911 · FAX (805) 327-191 8
L~;:~TO~IES
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page i
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-8
Attn.: STAIg COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3314 (SOIL) TB-80
TOTD, L CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead None~Detected mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ali above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.'
Department Supervisor
41 OD Ar_Jas Ct. · Bakersfield, r_~ 93~08 · (812)5) 3~-------------------------~7~491 1 · I:AX (BI2b--) 2~7-1 91 8
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page 1
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: i0/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-9
Attn.: STA/~ COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3323 (SOIL) TB-73
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L. mq/kq
Lead 87. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Aii above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 A~las Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (BOb-) 327-491 I · FAX (El2b-) 3~7-1918
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/i2/92 Page i
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-7
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID #3305 (SOIL) TB-47
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. ' Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 95. ' mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: All above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating .Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 Ar~as Ct. · I~akerstie*O, CA ~ · (B(ib-) 327-4911 · FAX (E)(i~ 3~7-1918
I_ABO~IATORIES
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page 1
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-4
Attn.: STAig COMER . 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3278 (SOIL) TB-40
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 68. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique emPloyed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
7~fLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 Atlas Ot~ · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (EE2b--) 327-4911 · FAX ~ 327-1
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-5
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3287 (SOIL) TB-37
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 41. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers ~o the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 Ar~as Qt. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (BI2b--)327-491 I · FAX (EI2D-)~7-191 lB
SMC LAB Date Reported: i0/12/92 Page i
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: i0/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-6
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3296 (SOIL) TB-34
TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria ~
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 77. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: All above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
_STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, i986.
Department Supervisor
41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, OA 93308 · (B(2b--) 327~,91 I · I=AX (151Db-) ~7-191B
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAF~ERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-10
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3332 (SOIL) TB-30
TOT3%L CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 104. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. -- Practical Quantita~ion Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100Ar~as Oc.'. Bakers6elO, C~ ~)3301~ · (19Ob---) ~327~4911 ·
CUSTODY RECORD
Location of Sampling Collector
Name: Name: SMC
Company: Company: lab a ~__or_to.=
3155 Pegasus Drive
Address: Address: Bakcmficld, CA 93308-
Telephone: ( ) Telephone: ( ) Telephone: ( 805 .) 39'3-3597
FAX: (805) 393-3623
5ampizn.~ Method: oa,,.u~= x~?~. a~,xx Preservation Methods:
Sample No. Date Time Description Analysis Requested Laboratory No.
3323 TB-73 Total Lead ~
3332 TB-30 .... -
33 1 -88 " "
3350 TB-100 -
? -
Relinquished By: ~L ~ Company: SMC LABORATORY, INC. Date: 10/8/92
~ ~, ~. '' ~/ Company: ~ ~ ~ .~,~ ~o Date:
Received By: ( ~- ~_
Relinquished ~/ Company: Date:
Received By: Company: Date:
Re linquished By: Company: Date:
Received By: Company: Date:
Sheet~ of~
Location of Sampling Collector
Name: Name: SMC
Company: Company: Laborato~.
3155 Pegasus Drive
Address: Address: Bakemfield, CA 93308
Telephone: ( ) Telephone: ( ) Telephone: (805) 393-3597
FAX: ( 805 ) 393-3623
oamp-znK me~noa: Sample .~zv~. Soil Preservation Methods: Iced
Sample No. I Date Time Description Analysis Requested Laboratory No.
3251 I TB-7 Total lead ?~ "-/
3260 TB-4 " " -
3269 TB-1 " "
3278 TB-40 " " -- q
3287 TB-37 ,, ,, -
3296 TB-34 ....
3305 TB-47 " " --
3314 TB-80 " " -
Received By: ~,~ _,~_~---- Company: ~C/.~/~c~.-t'~_C Date:
Re linquished(B~y :) company: Date:
Received By: Company: Date:
Re linquished By: 'Company: Date:
Received By: Company: Date:
,,O , - .Sheet / of
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
· BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-1
Attn.: STAi~ COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3251 (SOIL) TB-7
TOTAL CONTAMINA/~TS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC ~'fLC
Constituents SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 15. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100Ar3as Or. · Baker~--15elcl, C~ ~)330~ · (5)05) 327~4911 ·
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/12/92 Page
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: 10/08/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-2
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SA/~PLE ID #3260 (SOIL) TB-4
.TOTAL CONTAMINANTS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sa~.ple .Results Units P.Q.L. Method mq/L mq/kq
Lead 16. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are rePorted on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to deter~hine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA~SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
41 00 Ar~as Ct. · Bakersfield, ~ 933019 · ~ 327~491 I · FAX (l~)0b--) 327-1 91 8
SMC LAB Date Reported: 10/i2/92 Pa~e i
P 0 BOX 80835 Date Received: i0/08/92
BD_KERSFIELD, C_A 93380 Laboratory No.: 9086-3
Attn.: STAN COMER 805-393-3597
Sample Description: SAMPLE ID ~3269 (SOIL) TB-1
TOTAL CONTAMIN/iNTS'
(California Code of Regulapions, Title 22, section 6626i)
Regulatory
Criteria
Method STLC TTLC
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Metho~ mq/L mq/kq
Lead 43. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Comment: Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable
based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration.
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Department Supervisor
4100 ACJas Oc. · Bakemsfield, CA ~. (15~2)5) 327~491 I · I=AX (l~(2b--) ~7-1 911~
Ship To! -'3 I't'~_.. Page r~ of ri CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: P~ject Name:
No. No. D~ ~m Ti~ Water Solid'O~t Vol. No. r~ ~s. Re~s
Sigmt~ Co~y ~ Ti~
Re~nquis~ by:
Re~iv~
Re~nquis~ by:
R~iv~ by:
S~i~ lns~c6ons / Shi~nt I H~lin~ Stm~ R~i~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOL~IONS~ ~C.
21 T~hnology Ddvc
l~inc, California 92718
The mstetlsl(s) listed srt receiv~ for analys~ ancot tres~bility evslust~n
21115 ~itchell ~ive, Sui~ 103
pro.fly of the client and not Environmen~l Solut~ns, Inc. At the conclusion of the t~t work,
sll rem~inin~ mslerisl(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventusl dls~l at n licens~ fscilit[: Walnut Creek, California 94598
ShipTo: ~'!H]~. P~ge (~ of ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
...... Date: ~ / tO/ ~
Bofin~ell Sa~le S~ple T'~ ~ ~ S~ple Con.nets
No. No. D~ Date Ti~ Water Solid O~or ~ Vol. No. Ty~:~es. Re~rks
_SD ~
Sig~t~ Comfy Date Ti~
Re~nquis~ by:
Re~nquis~ by:
R~iv~ by:
S~id lns~cfions / Shi~nt / H~lin~ Storage R~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 T~hnology Drive
I~ine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are receiv~ for analysb an~or treaability evaluation and remain the ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
pro~rty of the cli..t and .or Environmen~l Solutio. s, Inc. At the conclusion of the t~t work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventual dis~l at a licens~ facilitg.
ShipTo: [,.~r'IC Page ~ of "] CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: P~ject Name: /'4,7% ~ ~,{C Analysis
No. No. Depth Date Time Water Solid Other Vol. No. Type I Pres. Rcma~s
v v J ¢ ,
Total Number of Samples Shipped: I ~' Shipper's Signature: ~ Ii. [ 0.. ~".. , ~
Signatur~ Company Date Time
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special l.slruclio.s / Shipmem / Ilandling/Storage Requi~ments: [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC,
;21 Technology Drive
lrvine, California 92718
The mslerisal(s) listed sare received for nnsalysls sand/of treslability evsalustion sand remsain the [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
:2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
property of the client sand not Environmenlal Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work~ Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remsinin[~ materisl(s) will be returned to the client for eventusal dis[el sat s licensed facility,.
ShipTo: ~>I~('. Page /~ of r/ CHAIN OF CUSTODy RECORD
Attn: Project Name: t~'~'~ ,{2,~_ / Analysis __~
Date: '[ / 10 /
~ No. No. D~ Dam Ti~ Water Solid O~et ~ Vol. No. Fy~ ~s. Re~rks
3300
Sig~t~ Comply Date
Re~nq~sbe~ by:
R~iv~ by:
Re~nq~s~ by:
Re~iv~ by:
S~ci~ ins~cgons / Shi~nt / H~dlin~ Stage R~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, ~C.
21 T~hnology Drive
I~ine, California 927 ! 8
D ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
The material(s) listed are receiv~ for analys~ ancot trea~bility evaluation and remain the ' 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
pro~rty of the client and not Environmental Solution~ Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut C~ek, California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) ~11 ~ return~ to lhe ellent for eventual dispel at a licens~ facility.
ShipTo: S~'¥1~.~ Page ~ of r~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name:
Site ~cafion:
'Dam:
S~ple T . ~ g S~le Con.ne.
~ ~ B~n~ell Sable ~ Date Ti~ Wate~ Solid O~er Vol. No. I T~ ~s. Re~s
No. No.
~R~ ..-ql
3~q3 -ill
To~ Num~ of S~les Shi~: I ~
Sig~t~ Comfy Dat~ Ti~
Re~nquish~ by:
R~iv~ by:
Re~nquis~ by:
R~v~ by:
S~ifl Ins~c~ons / Shi~nt / Handlin~ Stage R~nm: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOL'IONS, ~C.
21 T~hnology Drive
l~ine, California 92718
T~e ~aterial(s) listed are reeeiv~ for anal~s~ ancot trea~bility evaluation ~nd remain the ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Sui~ 103
pro~rty o~ ~be client and not Environmental Solut~n~ Inc. At the conclusion of the t~t work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all rem~inin~ ~alerial(s) will ~ return~ to lhe client ~or eventual dlsp~l at a lieens~ facility.
ShipTo: -~I~C. Page r)x of ri CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
P~j¢ct No.:
~C Bo~n~ell S~Ic S~ple T'~ ~ S~ple Co.~.ers
No. No. D~ Da~ Ti~ Wa~r Solid O~cr ~ Vol.No. F~ ~s. Re~s
3267 "1%
3270 -Iq
3~7~ - SCl
~7 ~ -s9
Sigmt~ Comfy Da~ Ti~
R~i~
Re~nq~s~ by:
Re~iv~ by:
S~ci~ lns~cfions / Shi~nt I Handlin~ Stage R~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, ~C.
21 T~hnology Drive
l~ine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are receiv~ for nnalys~ nn~or tren~bilily evaluation nnd remain lhe ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suit~. 103
)ro~rty of the client nnd not Environmen~l Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work,
dl remainin~ material(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventual dlsp~l at a llcens~ facility. Walnut Creek, California 94598
ShipTo: ..~T*,{"- L_,.>--, P~g, j of r~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
'~ '~'~7 Oat,:
Samol* T',Oe ~' .~ Sample Containers
'~1~ Boring/Well Sample Depth Dar, Time Water' Solid OtherO ~ Vol.No.Type Pres. Remarks
No. No.
-32D] :/.:/,.,
-~--~ S'q _iq
3:261 -~1 ,,,
~ -lq. ,b x/
Total Number ofSamples Shipped:1 ~"Shipper's Signatun~:
Signature Company Date Time
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special Insguctions / Shipment / Handling/Storage Requirements: 1~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~-,~:',ul'{'~ ~O ~'~'~'~- ~-PO ~ ,,,i 21TechnologyDrive
. - lrvine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC..
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut Creek. California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility,.
SMC Anal~ical Chemist~
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine,' Ca. 92718
Date samples received .:09.10'-92
Date samples started :09-14-92
Date analysis completed:10-05-92
Date of report :10-05-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS'OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (Diesel}
~ ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
3340 TB-94 ND 10
3341 TB-8$ ND 10
3342 TB-95 34 10
3343 TB-89 18 10
3344 TB-96 30 10
3345 TB-90 ND 10
3346 TB-97 ND 10
3347 TB-91 ND 10
3348 TB-98 ND 10
3349 TB-99 ND 10
3350 TB-100 44 10
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 8015M
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm)
ND = None Detected
Kevi~ Laga~ ~
Analytical Chemist
3157PegasusDrive · Ba~rsfield. CA93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. BoxS0835 · ~kersfield, CA93380 ~; FAX(805) 393-3623
SMC
Client Name: Environmental SolUtions, Inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, Ca. 92718
Date samples received :09-10-92
Date samples started :09-14-92
Date analysis completed:10-05-92
Date of report :10-05-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project # : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (~iesel)
~ ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
3325 TB-83 ND 10
3331 TB-24 16 ~ 10
3332 TB-30 18 10
3333 TB-23 64 10
3334 TB-31 29 10
3335 TB-22 ND 10
3336 TB-92 ND 10
3337 TB-86 ND 10
3338 TB-93 ND !0
3339 TB-87 ND 10
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 8015M
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm)
ND = None Detected
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380;,,,,, FAX (805) 393-3623
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, Ca. 92718
Date samples received :09-10-92
Date samples started :09-14-92
Date analysis completed:10-05-92
Date of report :10-05-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Pr.oject ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (Diesel)
~ ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
3315 TB-77 ND 10
3316 TB-70 ND 10
3317 TB-71 ND 10
3318 TB-76 ND 10
3319 TB-81 ND 10
3320 TB-72 ND 10
3321 TB-75 ND 10
3322 TB-82 ND 10
3323 TB-73 ND 10
3324 TB-74 50 10
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 8015M
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm)
ND = None Detected
Kevin Lagan~he~i st
Analytical
3157 Pegasus Drive · ~rsfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box' 80835 · ~kersfield, CA 93380 FAX (805) 393-3623
~ ~e
Anal~icalChemist~
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, Ca. 92718
Date samples received :09-10-92
Date samples started :09-14~92
Date samples completed :10-05-92
Date of report :10-05-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project % : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (Diesel}
~ ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
3261 TB-11 ND 10
3264 TB-12 ND 10
3267 TB-13 ND 10
3270 TB-14 ND 10
3272 TB-59 ND 10
2299 TB-65 ND- 10
3311 TB-79 ND 10
3312 TB-85 40 10
3313 TB-84 ND 10
3314 TB-80 45 10
Method of Analysis' for TPH (Diesel): 8015M
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm)
.ND = None Detected
Ke~in Lagan~/ ' -
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 :,,,- FAX (805) 393-3623
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-30-92
Date of Report :10-01-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID ~q/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3341 TB-88 1700 5.0
3342 TB-95 2500 5.0
3343 TB-89 2000 5.0
3344 TB-96 1800 5.0
3345 TB-90 1800 5.0
3346 TB-97 2000 5.0
3347 TB-91 2400 5.0
3348 TB-98 2000 5.0
3349 TB-99 1800, 5.0
3350 TB-100 1400 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-29-92
Date of Report :10-01-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3331 TB-24 1200 5.0
3332 TB-30 1400 5.0
3333 TB-23 1400 5.0
3334 ~ TB-31 1500 5.0
3335 TB-22 1400 5.0
3336 TB-92 1300 5.0
3337 TB-86 1500 5.0
3338 TB-93 1300 5.0
3339 TB-87 1700 5.0
3340 TB-94 1700 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date AnalYsis Completed:09-23-92
Date of Report :10-01-92'
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil. and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3321 TB-75 3200 5.0
3322 TB-82 1600 5.0
3323 TB-73 2800 5.0
3324 TB-74 3200 5.0
3325 TBS83 2200 5.0
3326 TB-27 700 5.0
3327 TB-26 720 5.0
3328 TB-28 510 5.0
3329 TB-25 450 5.0
3330 TB-29 520, 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-23-92
Date of Report :10-01-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, m~/Kq
3311 TB-79 2600 5.0
3312 TB-85 3900 5.0
3313 TB-84 2200 5.0
3314 TB-80 3300 5.0
3315 TB-77 3100 5.0
3316 TB-70 3200 5.0
3317 TB-71 4300 5.0
3318 TB-76 3800 5.0
3319 TB-81 3400 5.0
3320 TB-72 4200 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-16-92
Date of Report :10-01-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3301 TB-46 700 5.0
3302 TB-49 660 5.0
3303 TB-66 740 5.0
3304 TB-32 760 5.0
3305 TB-47 460 5.0
3306 TB-48 410 5.0
3307 TB-67 890 5.0
3308 TB-68 690 5.0
3309 TB-69 940 5.0
3310 TB-78 930 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-16-92
Date of Report :10-01-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, m~/Kq
3291 TB-36 170 5.0
3292 TB-64 550 5.0
3293 TB-51 380 5.0
3294 TB-44 540 5.0
3295 TB-35 290 5.0
3296 TB-34 370 5.0
3297 TB-45 580 5.0
3298 TB-50 460 5.0
3299 TB-65 1500 5.0
3300 TB-33 510 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-14-92
Date of Report :09-30-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS'
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mg/Kq
3281 TB-54 410 5.0
3282 TB-41 520 5.0
3283 TB-38 370 5.0
3284 TB-62 460 5.0
3285 TB-53 350 5.0
3286 TB-42 660 5.0
3287 TB-37 320 5.0
3288 TB-63 410 5.0
3289 TB-52 480 5.0
3290 TB-43 910 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-14-92
Date of Report :09-30-92
prOject Name: ATSFRR
Project
RESULTS~OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3271 TB-15 430 5.0
3272 TB-59 2600 5.0
3273 TB-58 690 5.0
3274 TB-57 320 5.0
3275 TB-56 260 5.0
3276 TB-60 710 5.0
3277 TB-55 ' 370 5.0
3278 TB-40_ 460 5.0
3279 TB-39 270 5.0
328.0 TB'61 560 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-11-92
Date of Report :09-30-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : ~91-172E
· RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3261 TB-11 1000 5.0
3262 TB-18 480 5.0
3263 TB-3 360 5.0
3264 TB-12 1300 5.0
3265 TB-17 510 5.0
3266 TB-2 820 5.0
3267 TB-13 2600 5.0
3268 TB-16 310 5.0
3269 TB-1 ~720 5.0
3270 TB-14 1400 5.0
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
Anal~icalChemist~
Client Name:Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Attention :Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received :09-10-92
Date Analysis Completed:09-11-92
Date of Report :09-30-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
3251 TB-7' 720 5.0
3252 TB-8 710 5.0
3253 TB-21 830 5.0
3254 TB-6 440 5.0
3255 TB-9 480 5.0
3256 TB-20 800 5.0
3257 TB-5 470 5.0
3258 TB-10 550 5.0
3259 TB-19 290 5.0
3260. TB-4 750 5.0
Type of Matrix : Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 418.1
mg/Kg = milligrams per Kilogram (ppm)
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 .' (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
SMC ~,~c~ Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 9-04-92
Date Analysis Completed: 9-10-92
Date of Report : 9-10-92
Attention : Mike Leonard
Project Name: Santa Fe R.R. Yard
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
3175 East 14.9
3176 West 14.7
3177 South 14.7
3178 Hole 14.9
Matrix type: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent by weight
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157 Pegasus Drive * Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To: ,,./~/Zq/C~' //~ Page. / of / / CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ~"
Site Loc. alion: /,/~'~7~r 'z~'d
Date: t~
Sample T rpe ~ .~ Sample Containers
Boring/Well Sample Depth Date Time Water Solid Other Vol. No. Type:
No. No. ' D Pres. ' Remarks
sf- / ?/>y v ?---
1'3'
xo.
!
Total Number of Samples Shippe. d: I Shipp~r'sSignatam: ~'~,~ ~ ..... ~.
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by: ~' "
Received by: ~ ~
Slx=cial l,stmction.~! Shipment ! thndling/Stooge g~ui~m~ ?." ' [~ EN¥_IRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
,~6)/.~ ~/~:,5'~e7~ ~.. ~ ' 21 Technology Drive
J//~'/'"'X..}/' /~L/"/~'~''' L'/tt'~',~,O~ Irvine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remainin[~ material(s} will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility.
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 8-28-92
Date Analysis Completed: 9-02-92
Date of Report : 9-02-92
Attention : Mike Leonard
Project Name: Santa Fe R.R. Yard
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
3152 East 12.5
3153 West 11.1
3154 South 10.7
3155 Hole 12.1
Matrix type: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent by weight
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 . · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship'o: ~'7~ffl/~ '~?'~z~_t~;~ Page of CHA~ OF CUSTODY'RECORD
Atto: ~j~t Na~:
Si~ ~cafion:
i
B~n~e~ S~l, S~,le T~ ~ S~ple Con~ne~
No. No. D~ Da~ Ti~ Wa~r Solid O~er~ Vol. [No. ~y~ ~es. Re~s
J ' ~
To~ Num~ of S~les SM~: /~ S~r's Sig~tum:
Sigmt~ .Comfy Da~ ~ Ti~
Re~nquis~ by: ~ J~~ ~/~ ~/~ ]~" ~
S~il lns~c~ons / Shinto / ~lin~ S~orsge R~m~n~: ~ ENVIrONmENTAL SOLUTIONS, ~C,
' 21 T~hnology Drive
lninc, C~ifomia 92718
The material(s) ~ are receiv~ for analys~ an~or trea~bility evaluat~n and remain the ~ ENVIRONME~AL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mi~hcli ~ve, Suie 103
pro~rty of ~e client and not Environmental Solu~n~ lac At ~e conclmlon of the t~t work,
nil remainin~ mater~l~s~ ~11 ~ retum~ to the client for eventual dispel at a licens~ facility. Walnut C~, California 94598
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. [ Page 1 of 1
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Tim Lassen PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bakersfield/North American Bioremediation DATE: September 1, 1992
CLIENT: North American Technologies
PROJECT: 92-237
REFERENCE: GPA7-0071
UNITS rog/kg %
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS* TPH H20
ESI 2516 EPA 418.1 Landfarm Sample 1-6 (8/24/92) 3635 13.4
ESI 2517 EPA 418.1 Landfarm Sample 7-12 (8/24/92) 4320 18.3
ESI 2518 EPA 418.1 Landfarm Sample 13-18 (8/24/92) 3925 10.7
* The data in this repm~, were obtained usi t~e ] ~.PA-approved methodology listed and ax~ intended fo~
CC: Glenn Androsko
Mike Leonard
File
0 -.. t) 0
,ShipTo: ,,.~/t"~.. ~'t~ Page / of / CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Site Location:
No. ~o. D~ Date Ti~ W~te~ Solid O~er Vol. ~o. T~ ~es. ; Re~rks
. ~ ~' ~ Sig~t~ Comply Date Ti~
~e~nquish~ by:
R~iv~ by:
Re~nquis~ by:
Re~iv~ by:
~ ~gKL~ 21 T~hnology Drive
~' ~~ L~~~ I~ine' California 92718~,
The material(s) listed are re~eiv~ for analys~ an~or treatability evaluation and remain the ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,~mC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Sui~ 103
pro~rty of the client and not Environmen~l Solutions, In~. At the conclusion of the t~t work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventual dispel at a li~ens~ facility.
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology 'Drive
Irvine, CA 92718~
Date Samples Received : 8-21-92
Date Analysis Completed: 8-27-92
Date of Report : 8-28-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: Santa Fe R.R. Yard
Project $ : N/A
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample $ ID ~ Moisture
3073 East 12.7
3074 West 13.8
3075 South 14.1
3076 Hole 16.7
Matrix type: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent by weight
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To: ..~v///, ~.~f s/ .:.~ ', Page_~_L__of I, ,CHA~ OF CUSTODY RECORD
// ~ I. ~', ," , ~" :~ ~ ~ - -
D~: ~/
B~n~ell Sa~le S~plu T~ ~ ~ S~pio Con~n~rs
No. No. D~th Dam Ti~ Wa~r Solid O~er_'_ Vol. {No. ~y~ ~es. Re~s
~5~ ~-t~ ~-5V
' Sig~t~ Comply Date Ti~
Re~.!.~ by: i .'?'~,,' ~,,.', , ' · . ,~ .~ /-~; '/ . ~.,
R~iv~ by: ~ i
ReHnq~sh~ by:
R~iv~ by:
ReHnquis~ by:
R~v~ by:
S~i~ lns~ofions / Shi~nl / H~dlin~ SI~8~ R~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, ~C.
21 T~hnology Drive
I~ine, California 92718
The roster{si(s) listed are re~iv~ for analys~ an~or trea~bility eva{uatlon and remain the ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Milehell Drive, Suite 103
pro.fly of Ihe cl}ent 8nd not Env{ronmen~{ Solut{on~ Inc. At the conc{usion of the l~t work,
al{ remslnin~ tastefUl(s) will ~ return~ to Ihe client For eventual dlsp~l at a llcens~ facillt~. Walnut Creek, California 94598
SlLI. IKER I.ABORATORIEB LABORATORY REPORT
DF CALII=ORNIA~ INC.
'. 11:~_~ E~. Domir~Jez, ~ui~.,e I 159748 8/24/92 2
Oerson, GA · 9OT'aE~ Pu~tm~
['~Io]r:~3'7-71;~I · F~X [310)
~HT
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AEROBIC
SAMPLE PLATE
DESCRIPTION COUNT/G
B/kW: ESI 25~ 280,000
SAMPLE#: TB-85
DATE: 8-19-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 40HL VIAL
B/kW: ESI 2511 280,000
SAMPLE#: TB-~
DATE: 8-19-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 40ML VIAL
14Et~a cA'~CCHXA~ M.S. RECTOR
SlLL. IKER LABORATORIES LABORATORY REPORT
OF CALIFORNIA~ INC,
-, 11~ E. Oomin~uez, Suite I
S~PLES RECE;~D:
RECE[~D F~: ]RVSHE
HR. GLENN ANDROSKO
ENViR~HENTAL SOLUTIONS
21 TECHNOLOGY DR]~
IRVINE CA 92718
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AEROBIC
SAMPLE PLATE
DESCRIPTION COUNT/G
B/W: ESI 2488 1,600,000
SAMPLE#: TB'7
DATE= 8-19-92
S/~tPLE TYPE= SOLID
SIZE: 40ML VIAL
B/W#: ESI 2491 860,000
SAMPLE#: T8-11
DATE: 8-19-9Z
SAHPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 40ML VIAL
B/W~: ESl 2508 45,000
SAMPLE#: TB-22
DATE: 8-19-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SLZE: 40ML VIAL
S/Wff: ESl 2501 15,000
SAMPLE#: TB-46
DATE: 8-!9-~2
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 40ML VIAL
B/W#: ESl 2500
SAMPLE#: TB-51
DATE: 8-19-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: &OML VIAL
B/W~: ESI 2&~ ~0,000
SAHPLE#: TB-58
DATE: 8-19-92
SAHPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 40HL VIAL
* CONTINUED *
Ship To: ~"/~'/C'~ ,L/"'~ Page_____Lo~ / CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Site L~ation:
Sample T'~ ~ ~ Sample Containers
Bofin~ell Sample ~th Date Time Wat~ Solid Other:~ O Vol. No. T~ ~es
No. No. o ~ Rem~ks
I
Total Numar of Sampl~ Shi~: . ~ Ship~r'~ Signature:
~ ~~-Signature Company
R~eiv~
R~eiv~ by:
S~ial lns~ctions/~hipment / Handlin~ Stor~e R~u~emen~: ~ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~ ~<~,' · ~ T<~o~ogy ~ve
~.. ~ ~F~~ ~e, Cali[o~ia 927~8
~e material(~) li~ted are re~ived for analy*i~ ~ator ~atability evaluati~. At ~* ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS~ INC. .
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite. 103
conclusion of ~e test work. all r~aining material(~) will ~ termed to ~e cli~t
for ev~tual dis~sal at a li~ns~ facility. Walnut Creek, California ~598
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 8-14-92
Date Analysis Completed: 8-18-92
Date of Report : 8-18-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: Santa Fe R.R. Yard
Project ~ % 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
3030 East 13.7
3031 West 15.6
3032 South 15.3
3033 Hole 14.4
Matrix type: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
~f~,, ~'~
'Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To: .~ ~', ,[ - /- .., Page .~ of' 9. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name: ,/'~ ~-,~/ I? ~( Sample Conlainers ~ ~
Bo~ingJWell Sample Sample T~ pc
No. No. Depth Date : Time Wateri Solid Otherl ~ lO Vol. No. Type Pres. Remarks
' Ill
II
Total Number of Samples Shipped: ] [ Shipper's Signature: ,",~.~[ .,~..~..~ (.~_. .i_.-. ~. t, C
Signature Company Date Time
Re~iv~
R~iv~d
Special Instructions / Shipment / llandling/Storage Requirements: l~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
~roperty of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
dl remainin~ material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility'.
StapTo: fi ', -; : '~, Page [ of ~.~,· ~CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name: .~'
,,, ~jcct No.: // /
..... Date:
B~n~cll Sable S~ple T ~ ~ S~ple Con~ne~
No. No. D~ Dale Ti~ Wate Solid O~er__ Vol. No. T~ ~s. Re~rks
I ~ - ''~
/ /
To~ Num~ of S~lcs S~: ~ · .~
Sig~t~ Comfy Date Ti~
Re~nq~s~ by:
R~iv~ by:
Re~nquis~ by:
R~v~ by:
S~ci~ Ins~cfions / Shi~nt / H~lin~ St~age R~m~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 T~hnology D~ve
l~ine, California 92718
The material(s) lis~d nrc reeeiv~ for nnnlys~ nn~or tren~bility evaluation and remain the ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Sui~ 103
~ro~rty of the client nnd not Environmen~l Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the t~t work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
dl remninin~ material(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventual dlsp~l ntn llcens~ facility.
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. I Page2of2
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Mike Leonard ] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bakersfield Biotreatment DATE: August 24, 1992
CLIENT: ATSFRR - Bakersfield
PROJECT: 91~172E
REFERENCE: GPA7-0027
UNITS mg/kg %
SAMPLE NO. I~THOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS* TPH H20
ESI 2506 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-27, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1402 12.0
ESI 2507 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-24, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1227 14.3
ESI 2508 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-Lr2, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1312 14.0
ESI 2509 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-92, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1109 14.3
ESI 2510 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-88, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1546 15.0
ESI 2511 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-96, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1608 13.0
ESI 2512 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-91, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1642 16.6
ESI 2513 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-100, 2 feet (8]11/92) 1496 14.8
* The data in ~is ~ we~ obtained ~ ~ the EPA-~ored methodology listed and are intended for
COMMENTS: p~cess evaluation only and no~ f~ me ~ ~r~gul~t~r~ agencies.
LABORATORY MANAGER:
CC: Glenn Androsko
File
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. [ Page I of 2
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Mike Leonard PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bakersfield Biotreatment DATE: August 24, 1992
CLIENT: ATSFRR - Bakersfield
PROJECT: 91-172E
REFERENCE: GPA7-0027
UNITS mg/kg %
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS* TPH H20
ESI 2488 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-7, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2387 13.2
ESI 2489 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-21, 2 feet (8/I 1/92) 2000 11.5
ESI 2490 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-9, 2 feel (8111/92) 5158 11.7
ESI 2491 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB- 11, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2356 14.9
ESI 2492 EPA (418.1) Landfann Sample TB- 16, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1862 14.5
ESI 2493 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB- 1, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2676 15.7
ESI 2494 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-56, 2 feet (8/11/92) 778 11.8
ESI 2495 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-58, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1925 11.3
ESI 2496 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-40, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2750 12.0
ESI 2497 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-61, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1692 17.2
ESI 2498 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-42, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1975 16.4
ESI 2499 EPA (418.1) Landfann Sample TB-36, 2 feet (8/11/92) 1894 10.5
ESI 2500 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-51,2 feet (8/11/92) 1823 15.6
ESI 2501 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-46, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2383 14.7
ESI 2502 EPA (418.1) Landfann Sample TB-66, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2417 11.8
ESI 2503 EPA (418.1) ' Landfarm Sample TB-32, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2212 20.1
ESI 2504 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-85, 2 feet (8/11/92) 2987 18.1
ESI 2505 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-83, 2 feet (8/11/92) 3316 17.2
* The data in this report were obtained usin I the EP.~ ~pmved methodology listed and ar~ rote. haled for
LABORATORY MANAGER: J~
CC: Glenn Andmsko
File
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. [ Page_of_
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
UNITS mg/kg
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION' PARAMETERS* TPH
COMM~: ~ ~a6m ~y ~ nm fmm by ~a~
~O~RY
CC:
~ ~ ~ ~
, . ~.. . .-~o.~.C .... . ., . . . . -
S~pT~ %~... P~ ~ of ~ * "' -:' ; *.-" :', ~.OFC~ODY'RECORD,.::;,..: : :.?'.."'
~,~:
, ~ ~.:.. ~kn~.. · ;. 7-;...;,: ~:~-;:,~,..~~?,%.:?.. ::: %-,.~:,:..-;-.f::C,,~,F.. .
,0. ~0.~ ~,, ~ . . ~ · I~~. -.~,..- ......
. - wa~ ~o~a~ ~ ~ Vol ~ T ~ -':' ' '',~ ..... ~:" "' '.'-'-;' ' '"::::'".'
~-%~ ~' ,t,&, ~ · ~ ~¢ * '~,, -: '-~'" ' :-.-I.-"1 .... I:'-~.q~.'~." "-- ':" -
.... ' ' ', I '"' ... ....
~*'~*.. ! t ..1 " '!'a-'q~e- : ,. .' ,.'
q~ ....t ~ .~ ~'7 t , .- ".--
~6-~ I I "~ ' ~7~ -
~ ,-¢e I.t' t .. . a ¢ Z* . ..
:¢,-, I, , Iti I .~..-¢,rCE
~&-s~ .. 1It. t ' a efta" -
I I ....
Signat~ , ~Y ~te T~ ' .
crj R~i~-~ :
fxJ .,
? S~ l~c~¢n~ i SM~,~¢ / ~b¢St~g~ R~~: .....
~ · - · ~Jn~ C~sn.927ZS' :. '-".
~ .-' . ..... .....~,.. . . '. .<.
The ~al{s) H~d are ~ for a~lys~
ptope~y of Ibe ~ienl and not Environmen~l So~n~
~.~- .__, ~ [.. ,-. ~. ~..~ .~~5~ .. , -
~-~ '~ t~'-i ':~ ~ . ~ '~/5~ '. '-'
,~- ~ "~., ~ '~
9~/~ .... '
~.~,~'~; , '~ [~*~ .... ' '.'.'.:... ~ .... ~ ' '.' ¢t,~t~z ~-f~
(~ =
?' S~ Irish=dons / Shiest I Hnd~ Stye R~n~: ~ EN~ONME~ 50Lb~ION~ ~C.
ShipTo: _~f~_. Page ~ of t'~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: l~oject Name: ~_ An~ysis
Da,e: ~ /~ q~
Bo~n~ell Con~ne~s
No. ~ [~ Re~s
Tolal Number of Sarnp. les Shipped: Shipper's Signatu~:
Signature j Company Date Ti me
relinquisl~A by: - /- ! / ....... f/'"
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special lnsmiclions / Shipment / Handling/Storage Requirements: [~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
~roperty of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual dispOSal at a licensed facilit},.
Ship To: ~> l'~ Page I of ~. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name: ~ 7.~ F ~-(~../O.~ / 7/
Dat~: ~ / ~J / ~ ~ '~
Bofin~ell Sa~le S~ple T ~ ~ ~ S~ple Con~ne~
No. No. D~th Date Ti~ Water Solid O~cr ' ~ Vol. No. Y~ ~s. / ~ffff Re~s
Signat~e Comply Date Ti~
ReUnquishedby: ~7' / / L.l ' ~
R~iv¢ by:
Re~nquis~ by:
Re~ived by:
S~cil lns~c~ons / Shipment / Handlin¢ Sleage R~i~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
21 T~hnology Drive
~gsoliS b ¢'~ L.o.,zd lmine, Califomia92718
' ~-' ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
" . The material(s) listed hre receiv~ for analysh an¢or trea~bilit~ evaluatioa and remain the 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
~ pro~rty of the client and not Environmen~l Solat~as, Inc. At the conclusion of the t~t work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remainin~ material(s) will ~ return~ to the client for eventual dispel at a licens~ facility.
Shi~ To: ~ ~ . . Page
~ _ ~,. ~,,~4 ~,,~, ~,~ ~,,~ .. ~~~~:.~ .<' ....-
~a-5 ~ -. ~'~-, ,,.~ .~,~5~ ....-
~, ~-~ ~ I i ~ .~ D / .........
l'n,,-~,l 1. _1 ~ ~.~ ag~ '. '".'.. .. "'.
-- . ~._Re~"~ ~:
R~iv~ ~: ' '
~' ~S~ Insertions/Shi~nt/H~d~St~e R~n~: ~ EN~ONME~ SOLb~ION~ ~C.
l~ine, C~ia 92718
~ ~e ~al(s) ~ed ~re ~ceived t~ analys~ ancot ~ambi~t~ eva~nfian and re~ the ~ ~V~O~AL SOL.IONS, ~C.
prope.y o~ the dlent and not Envkomen~l ~lu~ng
ShipTo: ~{~C, Page I of ~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name: ~'/~f~- (~ Analysis
3 ISS Pe q,-c,.o ', ~je~t so.: q I-
Date: ~ / ~sMI / riaL.,, ): Q
Boring/Well ,lc Containers
No. Remarks
3.
Tolal Number of Samples Shippexl: Shipper's Signature:
Company ] Date Time
Signature
Relinquished by: .' (
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special Inslxuctions / Shipment / Handling/Storage Requirements: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive
~x0:~ol]~ h it~'~-~ Loo~,J lrvine, Califomia92718
The material(s) listed ~re received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the F'l ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work,
all remainin~ material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facilitlt. , Walnut Creek, California 94598
J~--'~ ~--~2 ~£~ ~ : 47 $~ L~OR~TORY P. 0~
Client Namez Environmental Solutions,
Address~21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
Attention ~ Hike Leonard
Date Samples Received ~08-11=92
Date Analysis Completely08-18-92
Da~e of Report :08-18~92
ProJec~ Names ATSFRR
Project ~ ~ 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
!~mple ~ .... ID ma/Ka DLR~ mq/Kq
2964 TB-46 2000 ~%~ 5.0
2965 ?B-66. 2100
2966 ~B-32 620 *-~ ~ 5.0
2967 TB-85 810 ~- ~ 5.0
2968 TB-6$ 990 -- ~i~ 5,0
2969 TB-27 680 .--- ~0% 5.0
2970 TB-24 410 ~ I~X9 5.0
2971 ~S-22 300 -- 13~ 5.0
2972 T~o92 430 -- ~% 5.0
2973 TB-88 590 - ~q~ 5.0
2974 TB-96 470 - I%O~ 5.0
2975 TB-91' 510 - }~q~ 5,0
2976 TB-100 470 -- ;Hi% 5.0
Type of ~atrix ; Soil
Method of Analysis; RPA 418,1
mr/Kg s =illigrams per Kilogram (ppm)
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
~rian Hiller
Laboratory Director
3157 P~ Drive · Ba~m~ek~ CA 93308 - ~0~ 393,3S~
P.O. Box 80835 * B~a~d, CA 93380 · FAX ~) 393~623
''
SMC l~bo~or~, Inc. AnalytJc~! ChemJstzy
~ddree~ 21 ?ec~o~og¥
At~ention ~ Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received ~08-11-92
Date Analysis Completed~08-14~92
Date of Report =08-18-92
Project Name~
Project ~ ~ 91-172E
R~SUtTS OF ~L¥SIS TO?~ P~TROLE~ H~ROCARBONS
(0il and Crease)
2951 TB-7 1800 ~ ~7 5.0
2952 T9-2~ [600 -- aO00 5.0
295~ ~B-9 ~800 ~- ~E~ 5.o
2954 TB-11 2200 : ~ 5.0
2955 ~B-16 2700 * 1~6~ 5.0
2958 ~-58 2100 ; lief 5.0
2959 ~9-40 3000 ~ %?~O 5.0
2960 ~S-6~ 3000 ' ~ S.O
296t ~-42 [800 I~ 5.0
2962 Ta-36 1900 ; 'l~q S.0
2963 TB-51 1300 ~ I~ 5.0
~pe of Matrix ~ Sol1
Method of Anal~sis~ ~PA 418.1
mg/K~ = milligrams per Kilogram (ppm)
DLR - ~tection Limit for Reporting purposes
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
P.O~808~ · .~s~9~80
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, Ca. 92718
Date samples received :8-11-92
Date samples added :8-20-92
Date samples extracted :8-24-92
Date analysis compl'eted:8-25-92
Date of report :8-25-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (Diesel}
ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
2961 TB'42 17 10
2962 TB-36 ND 10 '
2963 TB-51 ND 250 (PQL)
2964 TB-46 ND 250 (PQL)
2965 TB-66 ND 250 (PQL)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): DHS GC/FID
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm)
ND = None Detected
Brian Miller
Analytical ChemiSt
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address : 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, Ca. 92718
Date samples received :8-11-92
Date samples added :8-20-92
Date samples extracted :8-24-92
Date analysis completed:8-25-92
Date of report :8-25-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project # : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS:
TPH (DieselI
ID ug/g DLR,ug/g
2951 TB-7 400 10
2952 TB-21 45 10
2953 TB-9 60 10
2954 TB-11 ND 10
2955 TB-16 96 10
2956 TB-1 '150 10
2957 TB-56 ND 10
2958 TB-58 ND 250 (PQL)
2959 TB-40 750 10
2960 TB-61 56 10
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): DHS GC/FID
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit "
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ug/g = micrograms per gram (PPm)
ND = None Detected
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
SMC ~c~, Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 8-11-92
Date Analysis Completed: 8-14-92
Date of Report : 8-14-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard ·
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
2954 TB-11 12
2959 TB-40 11
2964 TB-46 12
2972 TB-92 11
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
~..~
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
SMC Anal~ical Chemist~
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
Attention : Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received :08-11-92
Date Analysis Completed:08-18-92
Date of Report :08-18-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mg/Kg DLR, mg/Kg
2964 TB-46 2000 5.0
2965 TB-66 2100 5.0
2966 TB-32 620 5.0
2967 TB-85 810 5.0
2968 TB-83 990 5.0
2969 TB-27 680 5.0
2970 TB-24 410 5.0
2971 TB-22 300 5.0
2972 TB-92 430 5.0
2973 TB-88 590 5.0
2974 TB-96 470 5.0
2975 TB-91 510 5.0
2976 TB-100 470 5.0
Type of Matrix : Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 418.1
mg/Kg = milligrams per. Kilogram (ppm)
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157PegasusDrive · Ba~r$field, CA93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. BoxS0835 · ~ker$field, CA93380 · FAX(805) 393-3623
SMC Laboratory, Inc. Anal~ical Chernist~
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
Attention : Mike Leonard
Date Samples Received :08-11-92
Date Analysis Completed:08-14-92
Date of Report :08-18-92
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/Kq DLR, mq/Kq
2951 TB-7 1800 5.0
2952 TB-21 1600 5.0
2953 TB-9 1800 5.0
2954 TB-11 2200 5.0
2955 TB-16 2700 5.0
2956 TB-1 4400 5.0
2957 TB-56 1100 5.0
2958 TB-58 2100 5.0
2959 TB-40 3000 5.0
2960 TB-61 3000 5.0
2961 TB-42 1800 5.0
2962 TB-36 1900 5.0
2963 TB-51 1300 5.0
Type of Matrix : Soll
Method of Analysis: EPA 418.1
mg/Kg = milligrams per Kilogram (ppm)
DLR = Detection Limit for Reporting purposes
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157PegasusDrive · ~rsfield, CA93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box80835 · ~rsfie~,CA93380 · FAX(805)393-3623
ShipTo:_G_~ I~fir~b 5 Page, I of J CHAZN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Projecl Name:i~. '~' ~'
Bofin~ell Sample Sample T. ~ ' Sample Containe~
No. No. ~pth Date Time Water[ Solid '~
O~h~ ~ ~ Vol. ~o. Type Pres Rem~
,. V
To~. Number of Samples Sh.~: q Ship.'. Signature: ~.
Signature Company Date Time
Rclinquish~ by:
Relinquish~ by: V
R~eiv~ by:
Relinqu~h~ by:
R~eiv~ by:
S~ial Ins~uctions / Shipment / H~dlin~ Storage R~u~emen~: ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
gesulty va21T~olo~ve
l~e, California 927
~~ ql~ ~ ~ q~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~e~afc~a~s) lisled are recei cd for analysis ~d/or ffealabilily evaluation. At ~e 2815 Mitchdl [~ive, Suite 103
conclusion of ~e lesl work. all r~aining material(s) will ~ relumed to ~e climl
for eventual disposal at a licens~ facilily. Walnut Creek, California 94598
SMC Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 8-07-92
Date Analysis Completed: 8-12-92
Date of Report : 8-12-92
Attention :'Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: ATSFRR
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
2944 NM 11
2945 SM 13
2946 WM 13
2947 EM 12
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To: ~ ~. C. /tl~.~ S Page I of I CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name: ~ ~-~'
Date: ~
Samole T, ~ ~ ~ Sample Containers
B~n~ellNo. SampleNo. ~th Date Time Water: Solid Oth~ D° ~ Vol. No. T~ Pres Rem~ks
Total Numar of Samples Shi~: ~ ShipFr's Signature: ~
Signature ~ Company ~te Time
Relinquish~ by: ] / ~
R~eiv~ by:
Relinquish~ by:
R~eiv~ by:
S~ial Ins~ctions / Shipment / Handlin~ Storage R~ukemen~:
~ ~e~l ~ ~. ~Ne }eO~O~ ~ ~ ~'RONMENTALSOLUTIONS, INC.
~ 21 T~olo~ ~ve
ImMe, California 92718
~ ~ ~ ] ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~e material(s) listed are re~ived f~ analysis ~ ~atabilhy evaluati~. At ~e 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
conclusion of ~e test work. all r~aining material(s) will ~ ret~ed to ~e cli~t Walnut Creek, California 94598
for evmtual dis~sal at a li~ns~ facility.
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 7-31-92
Date Analysis Completed: 8-04-92
Date of Report : 8-04-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: ATSF RR Solis Remediation
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~.. ID % Moisture
2897 NM 12
2898 SM 12
2899 WM 12
2900 EM 11
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
Brian -Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Ship To:, ~ ~ ~ Page / of [ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: Project Name:
Date: / /
Bofin~ell S~ple Sample T~,~ ~ ~ Sample Containers
No. No. ~p~ Dam Time Water Solid O~er ~ $ Vol. ~o. Type Pros , ~ ~ [ M/ r Re~rks
Total Number of Samples Ship.d:
Signature Company Da~ Time
Relinquished
by:
Received by:
Relinquish~ by:
R<eived by:
S~cial In~cfion / Shipment / Bandlin¢ Silage R~uriemen~:~ ~NVIRONMENTAL
~ f¢~¢/~ po ~' ~* /<~~ ~ 15520 Rockfield Boulevard,SOLUTIONS'suite D
INC.
Imine, California 92718
T/¢ 7~ ~ ¢ ~ ~T ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2820 Shadelands Ddve, Suite 1
Walnut Creek, California 94598
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 7-24-92
Date Analysis Completed: 7-28-92
Date of Report : 7-28-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: SFRR Soils Remediation
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
2832 Hole 16
2833 South 18
2834 East 15
2835 West 16
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
Brian Miller
Laboratory Director
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. [ Page 1 of 1
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Mike Leonard PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bakersfield Biotreatment DATE: July 21, 1992
CLIENT: ATSFRR - Bakersfield
PROJECT: 91-172E
REFERENCE: GPA7-0026
UNITS mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS* NH4 NO3 POd
ESI 2464 Landfarm Sample TB-72 (7/14/92) 0.65 13.2 0.28
ESI 2465 Landfarm Sample TB-76 (7/14/92) 1.30 30.8 0.32
ESI 2466 Landfarm Sample TB-78 (7/14/92) 1.04 13.2 0.24
ESI 2467 Landfarm Sample TB-83 (7/14/92) 1.04 26.4 0.28
2 feet at designated grid location. * Th~ data in this tnqnm wev~ oblainod umin r~ EP ~.. 'I n~ov .od m~hodolo~ limted and mm intruded for
COMMENTS:
samples
composite
of
pm:e~ *valuati~ only and no; for u.~ b-- ~a~ r~ ,{~a¢';~.
CC: Glenn Androsko
File
~~: / ~ . . .... ~-.
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. I Page 1 of !
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Mike Leonard PROJECT DESCRIFTION: Bakersfield Biotrcatment DATE: Suly 21, 1992
CLIENT: ATSFRR - Bakersfield
PROJECT: 91-172E
REFERENCE: GPA7-0026
UNITS
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS*
ESI 2464 Landfarm Sample TB-72 (7/14/92)
ESI 2465 Landfarm Sample TB-76 (7/14/92)
ESI 2466 Landfarm Sample TB-78 (7/14/92)
ESI 2467 Landfarm Sample TB-83 (7/14/92)
COMMENTS: All samples are a composite of top 2 feet at designated grid location. · x~ a,t, ~ aa, ~,o,
[~esa evaluatio~ only
LABORATORY MANAGER:
CC: Glenn Andro~ko
File
SMC, A ly ic l Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date SamPles Received : 7-17-92
Date Analysis Completed: 7-22-92
Date of Report : 7-22-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: SFRR Soils Remediation
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
2734 South 14
2735 East 15
2736 Hole 15
2737 West 14
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
ShipTo: ~'~ J,I/o Page / of / CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Project No.:
.... , Site Location:
, Date: ~ / /~ /~ '
B~ell S~ple ~* 1" , Sample T, ~ ~ ~ Sample Conmin~s
~o. No. ~te. T~e Wate~ Solid Oth~ ~ ~ Vol. No. Ty~ ~es Rem~ks
Signature Company Date Time
Re~nqu~h~ by: -..
R~v~ by:
Re~nqu~h~ by:
R~iv~ by:
S~I l~cfions I Ship~t / H~dlin~ Sto~e ~uk~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
~' ~ 21 T~oiogy ~ve
~ I~Me, California 92718
~ material0) listed are re~iv~ f~ ~lysis mO~ ~ataMlity evaluati~, ti i ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
conclusion of ~ test work. all r~aining mmriM(s) will ~ r~ed to ~e cliff 281 ~ Mitchell ~ive, Suite 103
for ~tual dis~sal at a li~ns~ facility. Walnut Creek, California ~S98
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. [ Page I of 1
REPORT OF TEST RESULTS
TO: Mike Leonard PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Bakersfield Biotreatment DATE: July 16, 1992
, CLIENT: ATSFRR - Bakersfield
PROJECT: 91-172E
REFERENCE: GPA7-0026
UNITS mg/kg %
SAMPLE NO. METHOD DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS* TPH H20
ESI 2459 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-7 (7/14/92) 1517 10.2
ESI 2460 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-24 (7/14/92) 1551 15.7
ESI 2461 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-32 (7/14/92) 2903 13.0
ESI 2462 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-51 (7/14/92) 2451 14.8
ESI 2463 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-56 (7/14/92) 1986 19.8
ESI 2464 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-72 (7/14/92) 4313 23.1
ESI 2465 · EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-76 (7/14/92) 4248 18.0
ESI 2466 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-78 (7/14/92) 4242 13.7
ESI 2467 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-83 (7/14/92) 4187 20.1
ESI 2468 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB~85 (7/14/92) 3226 12.8
ESI 2469 EPA (418.1) Landfarm Sample TB-85 Surface (7/14/92) 1413 16.3
· The data in ~his ~ were obtained using ~he~ EPA-a ~pl~oved methodology listed and ar~ intended for
COMMENTS: All samples are a composite of toP 2 feet at designated grid location unless
olherwise noted. LABORATORY MANAGER:~ ~]~ ~
CC: Glenn Androsko
Tony Lizzi
File
'" /'/( ~- Page [ of. / CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Attn: .. ,,.;de ~:.f Proj¢ctName: /~T~F?.~. / Analysis
Date: P / /? / l k
Sample Containers
Boring/Well
No. No. Depth i Date' Time Wate~ Solid Other , Fype
Total Number of Samples S~.,ff~e_d: L~ Shipper's Signalure: )~ ~ (~Ln, x
Signature Company Date Time
Re _,~__'vcd by:
I R~li~qui~l~d by:
Received by:
Special lnsl~clions / Shi?m~nt / Handling/Storage Requirements: [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive
lrvine, California 92718
[] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility'.
BIL. I. IKEI:I I. ABORATORIEB LABORATORY REPORT
--n-------- ----- .-I'~-ALII=OI:;INIA~ INC. n,m,,,. 0,,, ~,~
OF
11~ EE. OorninlDuez, ~Ji~e I 157542 7/23/9:~ 1
SAMPLES RECEIVED: 7/20/92
RECEIVED FROM: IRVINE
MR. GLENN ANDROSKO
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
21 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
IRV]NE CA 92718
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AEROBIC
SAMPLE PLATE
DESCRIPTION COUNT/G
B/t~: ES! 246~ 220,000
SAMPLE#: TB-72
DATE: 7-14-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOL!D
S!ZE: 8'OZ dAR
B/W~: ESI 2465 300,000
SAMPLE#: TB-76
OATE: 7-14-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 80Z JAR
B/l~: ESI 2466 340,000
SAMPLE#: TB-?8
DATE: 7-14-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
SIZE: 80Z JAR
B/I.I~: ES! 2467 330,.000
SAMPLE#: TB-83
DATE: 7-14-92
SAMPLE TYPE: SOLID
S!ZE: 80Z JAR
DIRECTOR
Rem~
~..
SMC Analytical Chemistry '
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 7-10-92
Date Analysis Complete~: 7-15-92
Date of Report : 7-16-92
Attention : Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name: SFRR Soils Remediation
Project ~ : 91-172E
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
Sample ~ ID % Moisture
2648 south 13
2649 east 14
2650 hole 14
2651 west 14
Matrix: Soil
Method of Analysis: EPA 160.3
% = percent
Brian Miller
Analytical Chemist
3157 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
ShipTo: .., II,i,., - /.:.~,z Page ! of ] CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
No. No. D~th Dam Ti~ Water Solid O~er Vol. No. F~ ~s. , Re~rks
Sig~l~ Comfy Date Ti~
Re~nq, fish~ by:
R~v~ by:
Re~nquiskd
S~al lns~c~ons I Shinto / H~dlin~ Silage R~n~: ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS~ ~C.
21 T~hnology Drive '
l~ine, California 92718
~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Th~ msl~risl(s) IJsl~d sr~ r~c~iv~ for snsl~sk snoot Ir~smbilily evslustJon s~d remsin the 2815 ~itcheli Drive, Suite 103
~ro~rl~ of l~ cli~nl s~d ~ol Environmental ~olulk~s, Inc. AI l~ conclusion of lh~ l~l work, Walnut Creek, California 94598
SlI. LIKER LABORATORIES LABORATORY REPORT
OF CALII=ORNIA~ INC. ~o,,o. om ~,~
11~ i=. [~nin~uez, Suite I 156172 7/08/92 2
CONTINLED:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AERO~]C
SA34PLE PLATE OJLTURE
DESCR ! PT ! ON COUNT/G ]DENT ! F ! CAT ! ON
B/~it: ES! 2&Z~ 200,000 ............
SA,~PLE#: TB-72
DATE :6/26/92
SN, E)LE TYPE:SOL%D
SIZE:& OZ. JAR
B/g#:ESI 2~*~8 120,000 PSEUDOHONAS STUZER I
SAI~LE#:TB-?8
DATE :6/26/92
SAMPLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:~ OZ. JAR
B/JWt:E$12&50 50,000 ALCALIGENES
SAHPL~E#:TB-85 DEN%TR]F]CARS
DATE :6/26/92
SA/6)LE TYPE:SOL!I)
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/~'t :ES! 2&5~) 1,200,000 PSEUDOHONAS STUZER ]
' SAY~PLE#: TB-96
DATE :6/26/92
SN,~P LE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:& OZ. JAR
D ] RECTOR
SILLIKER LABORATORIES LABORATORY REPORT
OF CALIFORNIA~ INC. moo, No. D.~ ~
; 113~) E. Dominguez, Suite I 1561~ 7/~/92 1
Ca.on, CA * ~74~ ~~
[310] ~7-7181 · F~ (310] 6~7-8~
RECEI~D FR~: ]RVINE
NR. GLENN A~ROSKO
E~IR~HENTAL SOLUTIONS
' ~1 TECHNOL~Y DRI~
IRVINE CA 9~718
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
AEROBIC
SAHPLE PLATE CULTURE
DE SCR I PT I ON COUNT/G ! DENT I F I CAT I OH
B/k~:ESI 2&2~ ?..:30,000 PSEUDOHOHAS STUZER l
SAHPLE#: TB-?
DATE :6/26/92
SAMPLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/I.I~:ES12451 380,000 PSEUIX)~NAS .'
SN4PLE#: TB- 11 TESTOSTERON l
DATE :6/26/92
SAHPLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/~:ESI243Z~ 90,000 CDC GROUP IV C-2
SAHPLE#: TB-22
DATE :6/26/92
SAMPLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/W#: ESI 2441 250,000 ............
SAMPLE#: TB-46
DATE :6/26/92
SM4PLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/I,It/:ES12442 210,000 PSEUDOHOHAS STUZERI
SAI4PLE#:TB-51
DATE :6/26/9~
SN4PLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
B/kW:ESIZ445 2~400,000 CDC GROUP IV C'2
SANPLE#: TB-58
OATE :6/26/92
SAMPLE TYPE:SOLID
SIZE:4 OZ. JAR
* CONTINUED
ATTACHMENT A
LABORATORY REPORTS AND
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS
TREATMENT CEI~I~ SAMPLES - TPH,
NUTRIENTS AND BACTERIA PLATE COUNTS
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
FIGURE 2
SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRESS
SANTA FE RAILWAY
BAKERSFIELD RAILYARD
1,000-
INITIAL SOIL CONCENTRATION
10,000- Total Oil and Grease
Method 418.1 (Screening)
9,000- INITIATION OF
BIOREMEDIATION Fuel Hydrocarbons (Diesel)
8,000- EPA Method 8015 (Final)
7,0OO-
6,000-
5,000-
4,0O0-
3,000-
1,000-
40
0-
TIME
LUMBER SHED
0 100 200 FEET
SCALE
FIGURE 1
MONITORING PLAN
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
o' -.?:: ::v..'.... ~-' ':'" . ...... 78 ......
12 .': ' .' :
! IRON SHED I ! ! i .....
i. ..... j ! STOREHOUSE
LEGEND
-~- ...... 4-FOOT RETAINING DIKE (REMOVED)
· ..: .--.i - RAILROAD TRACK (EXISTING AND FORMER LOCATIONS)
EXCAVATION LIMITS
TREATMENT BED BOUNDARY
SAMPLING GRID
NOTES: SAMPLES COLLECTED AT APPROXIMATE CENTER OF EACH CELL
AT DEPTHS RANGING FROM 1 TO 3 FEET. SAMPLE DEPTHS AND
LABORATORY RESULTS ARE INDICATED IN TABLE 1.
TABLE 3.0
SUMMARY OF VERIFICATION ANALYSES(1)
TOTAL LEAD
PRACTICAL
SAMPLE LOCATION- CONCENTRATION QUANTIFICATION
(mg/kg) LIMIT (PQL) (mg/kg)
TB-1 44 2.5
TB..4 16 2.5
TB-7 15 2.5
TB-30 104 2.5
TB-34 77 2.5
TB-37 41 2.5
· TB-40 68 2.5
TB-47 95 2.5
TB-73 87 2.5
TB-80 ND 2.5
TB-88 84 2.5
TB-100 28 2.5
Average Concentration 55
91-172E (11/6/92/ds
(1) Locations of samples shown in Figure 1; samples collected Septembex 10, 1992.
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
;LE 2
ION MONITORING
BAKERSFIELD YARD
tOTAL FUEL HYDROCARBONS, DIESEL (EPA METHOD 8015)(1~
~IBI~ Pa~e 2 of 2
1'B-64 TB-~ TS-66 TS-67 TB-68 TB-69 TB-70 TB-TI TB-72 'rB-73 1'B-74 'FB-75 'FB-76
I ft/72o 2 fl/-/,4oo i ft/3,5oo 2 ft/i,8oo i ft/5oo I ft/14,ooo 2 ft/6.7oo 3 ft/'3,d00 I fi/14,000 2 ft/'3,000 3 ft/5,000 2 fi/6,700 1
__ __ I t~1,683 .... 3 ft/13,021 I ft/6,386 ....
__ __ I ft/3,778 ..... I ft/4,173 ....
- __ 1 ft/2,672 ...... I ft/4.$18 ....
- - I ft/2,512 ..... I ft/2.005 ....
-- __ I ft/3,508 ..... I ft/4.804 ....
- __ ! t~/2,352 ..... I ft/4,355 ....
-- -- 2,368 ..... 3,609 -- -- -- 3,440
........ 4,313 - - - 4,248
_ .. 2, l OOlqC4O) ..........
.550 1,5001(I~) 740 $90 690 940 3,2001(ND) ~4,3~1(H]:)) 4,200/0~) 2,$00/(I"~) 3,200/(50) 3,2001(ND) 3.800/(1'413)
~ Ti:'H TP[-I ~ II:'H ~ TI~ TPH TPH ~ Ti~ AVERAG{[ (EPA 418.1) Il
12
-- I ~3.~3 2 ~6.492 .... I ~3,671 .... 2 ~4.5~ 4.207 1~26 - 6.492
(670)
(6~)
-- 1,~2 1,224 ........ 1.777 2,108 1,085 - 3.~3
-- 5 {0 430 .... 470 .... 470 1.503 ~ - 2,7~
-- 1,642 I, 109 .... 1,608 - -- 1,496 2.082 (~8 -
91-172E (I 1~/92/m8)
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
SOIL REMEDL
SANTA FE RAILW/
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON (EPA METHOD 418.
TB-51 TB-$2 TB-53 TB-54 TB-55 TB-$6 TB-$7 TB-5$ TB-59 TB..60 D~[/ TB-62
INIHAL 2 ft/5, t00 ~ fi/g,?00 2 IV~,000 I ftt8,400 2 ft/6,$00 I ft/23,000 I ft/5,000 I ft/9,200 2 ft/7,300 I ft/4,200 2 ft/4,800 I fV270 2
(t0/t4/91-
IO/23/9D
11121/91 2 ft/5.322 .... I ft/'~.931 - Ift/ 10.266 - - 2 ft/3.218
12/12/91 2 f0'18.523 .... I ft/3.321 - ! ft/,$.630 - - 2 ft/3.766
115o) (6s0)
11.50o)
5113192 2 ft/'2,059 .... ! f~2.089 - I ft/2,374 - - 2 ft/2.166 -
6/26/92(2) !.801 .... 1,772 - 1,935 - - 1,389 -
7114./9212) 2,451 .... 1,956 ......
8/11/9212) 1.300/(ND) ..... 1, 100/(ND) - 2,100/(ND) - - 3,000/156)
8/24/92(2) 1.823 .... /778 - 1.925 - _ 1,692 --
9110/9212) 380 480 350 410 370 260 320 690 2.600/(ND) ?10 560 460
TB-77 'rB-78 'rB-?9 TB-80 TB-81 TB-82 TB-83 TB-84 TB-85 TB-86 TB-87 TB-88 '1
INITIAL 3 ft/9,600 2 fr/3,000 I ft/3.700 I 2 f~/4.500 3 fl/~.500 ! tV~.600 2 fff'/.~00 2 f~7.~00 I tVT,g00 2 ~4.100 i ft/3.~00 2 f*~L000 I l
10/23/91)
11121/91 - 2 t't/6.625 .... 2 ft/8.228 - I Mt/21.868 - - 2 ft/3.9.t~
12/12/91 - 2 tk/~.049 - -- 3 ft/10.640 - 2 ftY$.344 - I ft/5.75! - - 2 ft/6.884
1/15/92 - 2 tW2.151 .... 2 ft/5.418 - I fl/4.674 '7 - 2 ft/2.620
2/12/92 - 2 ft/~.436 ..... 2 ft,'4.976 - I fl/5.915 - -- 2 ft/3.176
3]12/92 - 2 ft/I.083 .... 2 ft/4.523 - I ft/2.727 - - 2 ft/6.159
.$114192 - 2 t't/3.718 ..... ft/5.08(d - I ft/5.4581 - -- 2 td4..271
(I.100)
5113192 - 2 ft/4.507 ..... 2 ft/4.406 - I fl/7,258 - -- 2 ft/2,397
6/26/92(2) - 2,929 - - - . -- 3,643 - 2,160 -- 1,732
7114/92(2) - 4,242 ....... 4.187 - 2.31913) ....
8111/92(2) .......... 990 - 810 - -- 390
.... 3.316 - 2.987 - -- 1.346
8/24/92(2) .....
9/10/9212) 3.1001(ND) 930 2.6001(ND) 3.3001143) 3.40011ND) 1.600/(ND) 2.200liND) 2.2001(ND) 3.900/140) 1.300/(ND) m.700/(ND% 1.7001(ND) 2.,
(I) All concentrations in rog/kg;, total petroleum hydrocarbons (dies,=l) EPA Method 8015 shown in pa~nthesis.
(2) Composite sample over treatment bed d~pth.
(3) Average of sur face and composite sample.
14) North American Environmental Pilot Test sampks.
dONITORING
ERSFIELD YARD
FUEL HYDROCARBONS, DIESEL (EPA METHOD 8015)
of 2
TB-14 TB-15 TB-16 TB-17 TB-18 TB-19 TB-20 TB-21 TB-22 TB-23 TB-24 TB-25
iV7,700 3 ft/10.000 2 fi/8,300 ! tVll,000 2 fi/8,900 3 fi/9,500 2 f-I/13.000 I ft/7.000 i ft/2,000 2 ft/l,500 I ft/4,500 2 ft/2,600
- - 2 ft/15,142 .... I ft/7,161 I fl/5,472 - -
- ~ 2 fl/11,029 ..... I ft/5.390 I ft/6,731 -- - 3 ft/3,478
-- 2 ft/6,675 .... I ft/4,302 I ff/2,371 -- - -
-- -- 2 ft/6,340 .... i ft/3,957 ! ft/3,832 -- -
__ -- 2 ft/6,336 .... I ft/2.638 I ft/I,147 ....
- -- 2 ft/4.695 .... I ft/2,096 I f~2,399 -- - -
-- -- 2 ft/3,505 ..... I ft/2.639 I f~.345 - - -
- .. 2.790 .... 2.238 2.362 - 1,085 -
.......... ~.~' -
- _ 2,700/(96) ..... 1,600/(45) 300 - 410 -
_ !,862 .... 2.000 1,312 -- 1:227 -
-
j 1,400/(ND) 430 310 $10 480 290 800 830 1,400/(ND) 1,400/(64) 1,2001(16) 450
'flail TPH 'n=H 'IPH TPH T[~ ~ TH.t ~ 'IPH 'IPH TPH
2 ft/570 I ft/I.200 3 ft/I.100 2 ft/4.500 I f~3,000 3 ft/170 2 ft/I,500 i ft/8,600 3 it/t00 t ft/2,700 2 fi/6,900 ! ft/8,700
..... 2 ft/7.229 ........
~ .... 2 ft/2,251 -- -- _ I ft,/I.II3 ....
..... 2 ft/15,085 - - _ I ft/3.166 ....
_ - - 2 ft/3.4~0 - - -- I ~4.404 ....
.... 2 flYlO,Ol2J - - -- I fmYS19 ....
I00
_ _ _' 2 ft/2,093 -- -- -- I ft/4,935
_ - - 2 ft/2,6oo - - - t fV2,7oo ....
- 2.213 -- 2,271 - -- -- 2,493 ....
-- 3,000/(750) -- 1,800/(17) - -- -- 2,000/(ND) ....
~- 2.750 - 1,975 .... 2,383 ....
270 460 520 660 9 I0 340 580 700 460 4l 0 660 460
,* 05,
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
TAB[
SOIL REMEDIATI(
SANTA FE RAILWAY -
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON (EPA METHOD 418.1)/T
SAIVlI~LE N1
TB-I TB-2 TB-3 TB-4 TB-5 TB-6 TB-7 TB--8 TB-9 TB-10 TB-II TB-12
DATE DEPT~ DI~TH/ DEPTH/ DEI~*H/ DEPTH/ DI~!I:qT-V DEFrH/ DEFfl4/ DEP'IT4/ DEIc~H/ I~E[~FEI/ DEFIT~ !
]NTFIAL I ft/3.100 2 ft/$,I00 3 ft/6,600 2 ft/6.300 I ft/3,400 3 ft/3,800 2 ftJ350 2 ft/5.200 3 ft/4,800 2 ft/1,800 I ft/6.200 2 ft/I,500 3
(t0/14/91-
10/23/91)
t1/20/91 I ft/5,353 ..... 2 IU39 - - _ I ft/5.415 --
12/It/gt t ft/2,204 - 3 ft/4,566 -- - - 2 ft/"/3t _ 3 ft/?,746 - I fV19,g96 -
1/14/92 1 ft/2,005 ..... 2 ft/3,2S8 - I ft/2,196 - I ft/3,288 -
2/12/92 I ~5,400 ..... 2 ft/t,526 - - - I f~/5,246 -
2/12/92 ! ft/4,218 ..... 2 ft/2,$64 - - - t ft/I,4S6 -
4114192 I ft/2,506 ...... 2 ft/1,S0! - - - I ft/2,935 -
5/13/92 I ft/1,124 ..... 2 ft/3,104 - - - t ft/2,149 -
6/26/92(2) 1,412 ..... 1,16t - 2,190 - 2,348 -
7114/92(2) ...... t ,517. - ....
Sit 1/92(2) 4,400/(I 50) ...... 1,$001 - t,S001(60) - 2,200/(ND) -
(400)
S/24/92(2) 2,676 ..... 2,387 - 5,158 - 2,356 -
9/10/92(2) 720 820 360 750 470 440 720 710 480 550 1,0~0/(ND) 1,300/(ND) 2,
SAMPLE N~
TB-26 TB-2? TB-28 TB-29 TB-30 T13-31 TB-32 TB-33 T!3-34 TB-35 TB-36 T!3-37
DATE DEFTT-V DEFTH/ DEI~H/ DEPTH/ DI~,'IH/ DiE~IT-V DEFI~ DF. FIT-V ~ DEPTH/
IN1TIAL 2 ft/8,100 2 ft/3.?00 t ft/I,600 2 f~/l.300 I ft/3, t00 2 ft/18,000 I ft/2,400 2 ft/2.800 3 fr/12,000 t ft/250 2 ft/'/20 3
(10/14/91- (I ft/~20)
10/23/91)
I 1/21/91 - 2 ft/2.728 -- .. -. ..... 2 t~/2.c)62
12/12/91 -- 2 ft/25,379 .... t ft/3,638 - _ -- 2 f~/l,2S5 --
1/15/92 -- 2 ft/3.076 .... I ft~,625 -- -- -- 2 t~/l,61l ---
2/12/92 - 2 ft/2,SS$ .... i ft/5,801 - -- - 2 ~/2,57[ --
3/12/92 - 2 tV2,235 .... I ft/4,353 - -- - 2 ft/2,564 -
4/14/92 - 2 ft/3,519 .... I ft/4,$31 - -- - 2 ft/2,048 -
5113192 - 2 ff/3,384 .... I ft/3,111 = - - 2 ft/2,94.$
6/26/92(2) - 1,285 .... 2,367 - -- _ 2,023 --
7/14/92(2) ...... 2,903 .....
8/11/92(2)' - 680 ' _ -- _ - 620 - -- - 1.900/(ND) -
8/24/92{2) - 1,402 .... 2,212 _- - - 1,894 -
9110/92(2) 720 ?00 510 520 1,400/(18) i,500/(2~) 760 510- 3?0 290 i?0 320
(t) AJi concentrations in mE,/ic~ ~otal pelzoleum hydmcarhons (diesel)EPA ZVEethod 8015 shown in pa~endtcsis.
(2) Composile sample over treatment bed depth.
(3) Avera8e ofsurf~-~e and composite sample.
(4) No~lh Amedc~n Environmental Pilot Test samples.
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
CuNTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKb
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # !-?~'(".~,~/ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ~i'i
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, (~ta~, of Federal)
ate ~eegOr~ ~ctiv±ty ~ours
Code Description (lOths)
~ ..'~, . . . .:. ,.~,~,,,:: ~.~.~ ..1'~ ~,-
Notes: I:"' (,i" ,, ...,i: ,. ....
" ' ,,"
?/,. ~' .. .../ !..~ ....
, . ;,' ,-/,,.-1 :':
· , : ~ ,' ~ /,- ? '"'.
.t./.,. t'.
Data Entered By: . Date:
~NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LF. AKING TANK~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ! -] O0 0 ~. Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature D 6~) t",f'[~
Site Name or Address : ''~
Funding (Local,/State), of Federal)
Cat. egory Activity ~ours
Date ucx~e Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
.~RAcT OPTIONS FOR LFAKING TANK
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheen
Permit # ~ 17 O00g Site Specific Status .Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Funding (Local, (State) of Federal
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ( 10ths )
N#tes:
Data Entered By: Date:
5nv. Mealth 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89)
boNTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKb
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /~)~'~'L/~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ,.~./ ,
Funding (Local, i/State'), of Federal)
' Cat~ egory Activity Mours
Date uo~e Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
CuNTRACT OPTIONS FOR LW. AKING TANK~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ? '"" ~.'
z.~.C.,?. </ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ~i,~
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, ,State,'. of Federal)
Date ~eegOry Activity Hours
Code Description ( 10tbs
' '
Notes: ./?., ..{, .~.~ i:.... / ~:..... ~ ,.,~. ~ .... , . ~.' J
'[, t
· ~. . .., . .. ........ ~/~ ~,--.;,'-,-~ ,
"~.i ,
Data Entered By: Date
~ONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~ 7 ~0 ~ ~. Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature D ~,
Funding (Local, ~t~ of Federal)
Date ~eegOry ~otivity Hours
Code I DesCription (10ths)
Data Entered By: · Date:
o,~ |,. ~N~o
-- Your CAUU
' 'l AGAIN
j
J WANTS TO
J SEE YOU
~SI'GN E TOPS FO~ 4003~
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET ........................................................
Site Specific Status Changes (Describe Below)
Permit ~.__J_7..~_0_~_¢_~_ Employee Name and ,___D.~_O_~_[~___~._O~._.d~__ .... ~_
Site Name or Address__._~Z%~_.,_~__~.~z~j'j~.~ I C~-'~"'T/~ ¢ ~'~"'"'P"$ ........................................................
E.p~oy.e si~..ture ....... ~!Z"__h ..... .{-~___'~5 .............................. - .................................... ' ..................
Funding (Local, State, or Federal) ...... __~_ .................................... - .......................................................
Hours
ICat. Ilcttvity IOescription Activity
Oate ICed. ICode of (.lO's)
___~!~_t/~_l____~_ ..... I .... ~ ..... I----~-~r .... -~-~-~-~ ....................................................... I---~----
Notes
Enteeed 8y .......................................................................................... Oate
"'.,:, ' )NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TA~'
'~' oite Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~.--;~-)~.)¢j Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # 9
~uployee Signature ~/.~ ~Ft.)~j~/~
Funding (Local,(~tate'~ of Federal)
.' Hours
Ca~Ory Activity.:
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. l-lealth 580 4113 137 {Rev. 5/89)
'I
)NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TA~'
~ite Specific Time Accounting Sh~t
Permit #
/"?0 0 .~,'~- Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
~oFloyee Signature ,~, -~ ::
Site Name or Address ~A~.'rA ~[~
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
_Cat_ egory Activity Hours
Date
code
Code DescriPtion ( lOths )
Notes:
Data Entered By: Date
Env. Health 580 4113 1~7 (Rev. 5/89)
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET --' ............................. J ......................
Site Specific Status Changes (Describe Below)
? i~____~_~__j22_j~__ Employee Name and ~.__:2.~_~_~.'2.:~ ....... ~ ....
:re Name or Address ' '"' / /' ' ' " ' - .......................................................
----~. ................................ ~ ............. ~----.;
noloyee Signature ; / - / .....................................................
:nding (Local, State, or Federal) ...... j ...................................... - .......................................................
Cat. Activity I Hours
.ate Code Code Description of Activity (.10 s)
.ores
' : / ..... ~ ~ ; / ~' /"' ;'"'" ~! ",' ' t'. ..... - ..... *' ' '
................ ~ ......................................... ---~ .... .; ....... ' .........' ............................... 22--' .................
:tered By ........................................................................................... Date .............................
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TINE ACCOUNTING SHEET
Permit il I-/~SC'(",~ Employee Name & Number ~F..,~..~",/Ji(~ ~ ,~-~" t,'~ ~-t FY
. ~.' F.. /: :.. I~. .... 1 .'.. ,
Site Nato or Address ............................... ~. ......... : ............... '___'. !
Employee Signature I..' , ('. , '"- .
Funding (Loc'al,. State, or Federal) ..................................
mCat. JActivityJJoescription JHours.
Date JCode ICode of Activity
I(.10's)
--:xT;,-FT-7::; .... --.F ...... 7--7: ...... ;---7.'F .... Fi .... 77,'~--7-7-7-F ................ 7--: .............................. 7'-.-,-~:.- ....
.... ~--:- .... :1 .... :- ..... I ..... : ...... I ............ ~- ......................... ::-- .... : ..................................... I ...........
Notes
.... ~-..,:.-f~;:7 .... ~- ..... ~FF--/---~,-F'..F ...... F-., -F-.. ¥ ..... ~ ~-, ..... ~¥ .... ? ....... '? ............ F ........................ ~; ........
.... -~- .... : ........ .---;7 .......... 7 ............. '; .... ,7~7 ...... l--.FF? .... 7? ..... ;,-F; ........ FF'-7 ......................................
.... '_'____~L_':__' ........ '_ .......... '_._,'___~ ..... _'_~ ..... ~:L'~' ........... :~_, ........... :. ....... ~_.~ .........................................
Data Entered By .......................... Date ........................
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET
Site Soecific Status Changes (Describe Below)
Permit ~ )~000~/ Employee Name and ~ ~OLO~ ~0~/
Site Name or Address .... J..'~-__~___~-Cc__~__~_'/r~ {C/--~.'[~ ~ ~J ........................................................
Employee Signatuee ~Ol~. .¢~_~ ................................. - .......................................................
unding (Local, State, or Federal) ~ _ ..... ~ ........................................................
..................... ~ ........... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..............................................................
' mcat. IActivity I {Houp~ {
Date iCede ~Code IDescription of Activity . I(.lO s)
Z~;21~2~Z;~ ..... ~-~-~ ....... ~ ..... ~;~:---~;~;F~- .................................................. :-'--F-;:~- .....
Notes .................................................................................................... ~ ...........
................................................................................................ ~___j ...... ~ ...........................
Enteeed B~ Oat~
Site Specific Time AccoUnting ~nee~
Permit # j -,7(,~.: ,-'.;c' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee
Employee Signature
Site. Name or 3~].dress
Funding (Local, State, of Federal).
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date ~te C_x~e I~scription ( 1Orbs )
Notes:
,~),'// ~ '¢~~ ~ * ~'/I g~ ~~ ~ Cbck ,'~ ,'~. ~'~
Da~ Enter~ By: P,'~e ~ ~'~ )'I~. rote:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /?dC ~5 ~:i" Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of ~ederal)
ctivity
Date ,Code Description ( 10ths )
/ ,..; ~ ' ,.:,
' ' ' ' :/ ',';.-i i '?''
~~' ~.
~ .... ? ~ , :~" ~ ~ ~.~
'~ ,, .._~ ~,. ... ~ .. . ~..'3 " ~ "' ~ _ .-,.. ~'- " ~ . : z. . ~:
.... ... .
-,-:~ :,.. ~ .~. ...:
/.~..~. ....
? : ...~ ..... / -':' : , t-.': ;! .... ~ , I ':."-~i,~. "-'~ ' ; ....
..,', ~
Data Entered By: Date:
~m~.~ea~ 580 4~3 ~37 (Re~. 5189)
C~.,fRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
:Permit. # ? ~;,(..-,, ( ~? Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # :..1
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of ~de,r,.a~)
Cat. egory Activity Hours
l~te cocte Code l~scr±ption ( 10ths )
Notes: ':: . : / :
/- ,, , ........ -,-~ ,
...,/:-"/ "~ /
. ,. .,_,.
/
,' /:' I/ .. ~>', ~
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
'~','": .... ': Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Cat~egory Activity Hours
Date ~o~e Code DescriPtion (lOths)
Data Entered By: ' Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~ 7 <~.:. ( ~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of F.~er~l)
· ~gory Activity Hours
Date Code DeScription (10thc)
Notes': {';t .i.', ; ~ ~:'" '! (',.~,,~'.."~~. ' ' J ~ "
,, .-i /
· [~,~ ,
:,, ,
! 7 .
"
Data ~.ntered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # 1'-~ ~_.O '?_"~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ,3I
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of ~ed )
Category Activity Hours
Date
Code-
Code Description (10thc)
l .. /
, , ,~-. ~ I~ l,~,~
, . ;_...,:?, , y~//
Data Entered By: Date:
5.¥.~eaJth 580 4113 ]37 (Rev. 5/89)
C~,fRACT OPTIONS FOK LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~ 7..'. ' ' ' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Pur~ing (Local, State, of Fgder..al)
~gory Activity Hours
Date Code Description ( 10ths
Notes': L i ;, ? . :.,',.' ~' ' '. .....
'-·
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR ~.RAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # -'~ ~': U ~]" 'i~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of(~edera/~)
Cat~ egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ( 10ths )
· :/".' ~ .... ' ! , i'--., ".~-~-':' '" ~: 'i" ~'"' .... ~': '"
:' " ' ' l? '-~ ,~d >.., ?. t.-..
'~". i:,.. ,
Data Entered By: Date:
C~.,fRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /· '? ~'.. c ~ 9. · Site Specific Status. Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
',ite Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date ~:x:te Cx:~e l~scription ( 10ths
/ : ;:'
Notes: [" ,~,~' . ~ ~ j / i ,. ~?_..,, ,~.
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
~;' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature ~.) ~...
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of ~Feder~l)
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date co~e Code Description (10tbs)
Data Entered By: Date:
EO¥. ~eal~ 580 4113 137 (F~ev. 5/89)
COl,. RACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANK..,
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / ' u~ ,: L ~'- Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee ~
Employee Signat~Jre
Site Name or Address ......... .~.~. :.. ,j:.
Funding (Local, State, o~;Federa.!l
Category Activi~ :- Houm
Date ~de ~de '~scripfion'- (l~hs)
!i,'I -~
i '"'/ '" l ':, '-' '.-'
Notes: I~.' .... , .. ' :~ ,~0. ' '/-; 7- ~";, .. z 'v' "./
, .... /'. :>.~ ,i
"
,' ~;., ,:~ ,.,... I ~ ~,~ ~.(.,. - ~ t': '"' ' ....
Data Enter~ By: Da~:
CONTRACT OP~ONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific ~me Accounting Sheet
Permit · I%' ('~"6 :_: .:~.' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee ~ '.:~
Employee Signature '~)"
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
Category Activi~ Houm
Date ~de ~de ~scription (l~hs)
' ' "~
Notes: -;, ~ ~: ~._~:. ~'. ~ & :,. ", ?. ;, ~ "
: , :,.... ,...,..?: ,.. :~.-,_~ ,(~ ~' ,,.
,
Data Enter~ By: Date:
E~. ~ ~ 4113 137 {REV, 5/~)
'CO, RACT OPTION~FO bE KING TAN~._
Site Specific 'Hm~ Acc, ounting Sheet
Permit # i ? '':~'- ~ ? Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address .
Funding (Local. State. of ~?deraI)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code. Description (1Orbs)
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / ')'~ ~i. ;.' ~-~' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ' .i
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of ~ler~',l)
Category Activity Hours
Date Gode Code I~scription (lOths)
.... ,-..,, _,~. . ~,, ~' . .... ~ ,
Data Entered By: . , .. Date:
I )t ~ En~. Health 580 4113137 (REV. 5/89)
C~_.~TRACT oPTIoNS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific. Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / -) ,*, ', -
~,O C)~. Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee. Signature
Site Name or Address .... .; ~_........
Funding {Local, State, of ~ederai)
Category Activity' -Iours
Date Code Code Description (1Orbs)
Notes: ,.'~i ,' i: /"' ,¥"' /'.--t, ~;t..~-:~:-.~-., -- . . ,
,~..,.,,....~.~ ,~.,~ :-, :i. ~:.
.._'.~-/~-
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /? ~;~r /., ::_'~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name. or Address ....
Funding (Local, State, of E-~era~)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (1Orbs)
.:; / ! '..;/. ~'i :'.; ~1 ~, ,.'.;, ._,;"-'
Notes: ~:,:.~ ;..': K~'*,;',;,.'~..-,;" .'.'-"~ '.,~'_;? ~':'-.~ ~ ....
·., ,~ ..- !j f ;.~,
· Data Entered By:
-r~ ~ ~'~ ~,; ~¢~-;,. +~-'~ ~k-.~"%~'~'"~'~""~'"'--~-~ ~ ~,
(._ ATRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ! '-t/~, .~.,./';.,' .:~" Site Specific Status Changes:
.¥
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of Feder~i)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
"" ' ~ '. ~.' '. Site Specific Status Changes:
Permit # i ;~ .....
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of' Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. I-leal~ ~ 4113 137' (RL=V. 5/89)
Cb .~TRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TA~!KS
Site Specific Time Accounting shee~,-"
Permit # ? '%~ ,:.: ".'...~' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address .
Funding (Local, State, of;F~deral)..i;
Category Activity Houm
Date ~de Code ~scription (l~hs)
.,. .,, .:~':~ ~ /. ?-~-.' , !. ~.,.:/,, .j'
Data Entered By: Date:
CON~ OP~ON~ FOR LEAKING TANK~
Site Specific ~me Accenting ~heet
Permit · / 7; :::":: ~'..:::' Site Specific Status Changes:
Employ~ ·
Employee Signature ~.
Site Name or Addre~
Funding (Loc~, State, of{F~der~)
Category Activi~ Houm
Date ~de Code ~scription (l~hs)
, ~ t;' ~,' ~.,,'..~:~; ~ {,~,~'~....~ z~--~' i1-'."~ --¥,...-~] ~., t ~.~: ,;{..... ~ b.--~-.~:.' .'".- ' "
Data Enter~ By:. Date:
E~. ~ ~4113 137 (REV. 5/~)
~ONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LW. AKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ,!-]~j'~/?~ ij Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Ftunding (Local, State, of(Feder
Date ~eegOry Activity Hours
Code ' Description (10the)
/ -'
. ~,~'...U' ~'~,/~'-',,~ ~ ~ ~-~ : Ir_ ,~" :-~ ~ ~-~--..:
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # lq 0~;">6 ~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature 7~ C~
Site Name or A~_aress ~,.~
~o~ Aotivi~
Date Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Mea%~h 550 ~11~7
~,NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKb
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ;'TJ' .L'~. ~.-/ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee
l~aployee Signature
Site Name or Address
~'hmding (l..~cal, State, of'F~leral')
Cat~egory Activity Hours
Date ~x~e Cx:x:le Description ( lOths
,¢/: ~i/!': / '? /
Notes:
I . 2.,.;
{..,, ~, ?' , ~-:i.. "-L ' '
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specifi.c Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / ~ t~,.~, ~> ~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
~o~ Activity ~o~s
Code Description (lOths)
Date
Notes:
Data Entered By: Date:
~-n~. Health 51~0 4~1:~ 137 (Re~. 5/89)
t~NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /-7,.~"; .~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, S.~..t~, of Federal)
Cat~egory Activity Description Hours
Date uo~e Code ( lOths )
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIC~S FOR T,~.AKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /?~> ~ ~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or ~0__dress~
Fur~ing (Local, ~ta~tv of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date
Code-
Code Description (10ths)
Notes:
Data Entered By: Date:
~m¥. ~ea~ 580 4113 1~7 (Rew. 5/89)
~ Cf.,._ ~'RACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAh,..5
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
'~'* Site Specific Status Changes:
Permit Cf ,:' %: '~ (i..'
Employee Cf
Employee Signature ~ ? ,'-
Site Name or Address ."
Funding (Local, ,S'~at?, of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
DateCode Code Description (lOths)
:'./,v ; "i i ';~/.',~ c..', /
Notes: /'): i?': "' ' ' . ,. ''/ ' /-
,:;o,'.,? .,. ,,.....? , ,..;
Data Entered By: Date:
-
I-1U ~,--j~, ,~¢C~.7 CONTRACT OPTiONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
~- (~" . Site Specific 'l~me Accounting Sheet
Permit # ,' ? .i ,..-',, ] Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # . .?
Employee Signature ':"; ,~' .~'/
Site Name or Address
, Funding (Local, State; of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (lOths)
Notes: ; · ¢ ¢ : ¢ ? / ;
.... ' ': t ~' " ~ :.;' 41' '"' ' "
i-,' ':/.' ,.--' ,../. ' ~.
./
" ' '" '" ¢' '": ·; ?-' /, 7,'
--,,....
"' ,.6.,'." /, ,, - "'
~ .
r :. ~' " z · '! . : ·
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (REV. 5189)
~ '" Ct../RA~ OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANn;S
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # J ~7~_;;":/.. (',',.~ L/- Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, ,state; of Federal)
Category !Activity Hours
Date Code Code' Description (1Orbs)
i,; ':'-/,'.: i '>
Notes: ;.< ,? ..:,-:
. ,., , .
'"i....,'...."?..' .... -~ . ."
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site ~pecific Time Accmnting Skeet
Permit # I"? ,'~ :'. c",."/ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ,:/
Employee Signature
~ '" "" ?
Site Name or Address:_?.-; .....
Funding (Local,.,Stat~; of Federal)
category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (lOths)
' i. '
, ......'?::. '.' fr.: !..,...-,. ~.., ~.' -~ : - l., ,-' ,.-
)
i ' ' ' / ?--,-. ....
· ' ,. ,
Notes: ~ ~ ., i :.:/
Data Entered Ely: Date:
Env. Health 5~0 4113 137 (REV. 5789)
CL . tRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANn$
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit Cf / -//-' ~.' (:.z C- Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # '~
Employee Signature
Site Name or Add. r__e.ss
Funding (Local,i~tate.~: of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (10ths)
' "", ":" ..... " t~ ii 1:::'" / ' ....
; ,il ~ ,~;.. ,' ~.l~ ~ .,'.: !-,.' ..'1 ,~ ~' ? ~ ...... :: ~,.~ . . ~ ....
,' j
Notes:
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit cf -7,,, ..,:,.', <~>,:/ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee cf ,:?
Employee Signature -~-~
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, ~t.a~¢'of Federal) '
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (lOths)
~ , :' ., /'/;
Notes: ,' . ½,, ~.
'
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (REV. 5/89)
CL ~'RACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAb..,5
Site Specific Time Accounting' Sheet
Permit # ] -7 U ~;' (_'~ .x./ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address -' ~ ......
Funding (Local, ,State~, of Federal)
Categbry Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (10ths)
N6tes:
, · ,.,,,, ~. {.
I
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / "/~.C~"~? ~ ,'~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Addl:e~s
Funding (Local~'Stat~,i of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (1Oths)
· ,,.~ ::]' ~-':~,.,~/~--, ,. ~. ,
Data Entered By: ,. . Date:
Em'. Health 580 4113 137 (REV. 5/89)
CO. . RACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAN,..,
Site Specific TIme Accounting Sheet
IPermit # { ~ d'O~ O'~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # Si
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address .,-~
Funding (Local, Stat~,, of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code' Code Description (lOths)
'ii'-'
I . ~.I '? " . ~," ? ,,.x ........ ..; ·
Notes: ~ , . ~
Data Entered By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /'7¢-'O O ~L Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or N~dress
Funding (Local, ~t~ of Federal)
Category Activity Hours
Date Code Code Description (10ths)
? ?
/
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Health 580 41 ~3 131 (REV. 5/89)
C~NTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /-?~ ~.,~>,"~ .Li~- Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
Funding (Local, rS'tate~ of Federal)
Cat~ egory Activity Hours
Date co~e Code Description ( lOths )
Notes: /'3 ..
'"' "'?-':-' '~'~
,
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /7~O~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature ~.73
site Name or A~ress
~in~ (~a~, ~tg, o~ ~edera~
Cat~egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description (lOths)
~"~li:~,.,,,l'i':, ~ /
Notes: r'%~.,p~?~,..~' :,,~.:.i~
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Plealth 580 4113 137 (Rev, 5/89)
~NTRACT OPTIONS FOR T.RAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~7 .'D(.?c>,~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Addre/as.
Funding (Local, iStat,e, of Federal)
Date ~eegOry Activity Hours
Code Description ( 10thc
·
: ..
Notes: i'.';:
.]L,..,~t . /~j .,., .
·..,:, .... , ': ,: : ,. >,- k .h-,' c:.,:,-,.-, /:,..:/:.
,..,._.-, .,.. .... ... i .': i,-.J ':~., ? .: b,,.,,,>,- .:-, ~>,., -'L --LA '-...J-:-./'
!
Data ~nte¥'ed By: Date:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ~ 7~,~0Od Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Addr~
Funding (Local, ~t~, of ~ederal)
~eegOry Activity Hours
Date Code Description (10thc)
u
Data ?.nte~ed By: Date:
[nv. He~lth 580 411] 1~-/ (Rev. §189)
:, , ........ .~. .~.~ , >. ...... .'
Holding on lirm'#' ........... ~-l~ease coil
Long d!stance ~:all.", Returned your call ....
Came
to
see you .Waiting.t°: s~ou .
,
~e,,ag ~: .......... ~ ...... .,....~ ............................................. '--'
, ~ .... T~. .> ~ ~ ~....~.~... ...... ~.~ ~....~,. . . .~... ..~. .. .~ ~. .~. . . . .~ ,
~ . ....~ ..... .~-.~.~...,..~.....~..~.L,...:....~:.~.'...~: ...................
..... ~..~.~.~ ...... L.~....,.: .......................................................................
.......................................................... Time: ..,.,~..~:..~ .....................
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
December 15, 1992
Project No. 91-172E
Ms. Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
TPH Results Evaluation
Santa Fe Railyar~l Bioremediation Project
B~kersfield. California
Dear Ms. G0ugh:
This letteris a follow up to our telephone conversation on December 4, 1991, regarding the
residual total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) levels at the Santa Fe Railyard bioremediation project
site. Specifically addressed are your questions regarding: (1) the residual TPH that was
detected by EPA Method 418.1, but not detected in the test for total petroleum hydrocarbons
(diesel) by EPA Method 8015, and (2) the remaining TPH levels at the bottom of the excavation.
As you know, we have been managing the bioactivity in the treatment beds by frequent discing
(for improved aeration) and adding nutrients and water as necessary. These activities were
completed to achieve our clean up level for total petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel) of less than
1,000 mg/kg.
To monitor progress of the bioremediation, soil samples were collected on a monthly basis for
TPH analysis by EPA Method 418.1. This method was selected as a low cost screening
technique since the results include, as "TPH," all freon-soluble compounds that contain hydrogen-
carbon bonds. This includes residual biomass along with any petroleum hydrocarbons.
Therefore, the EPA Method 418.1 results are generally considered conservative and "high end"
values since a broad specU'um of compounds including biomass are included in the detected value.
As presented in our Final Status Report dated November 10, 1992, the final soil samples from the
treatment beds were collected on September 10, 1992, to demonstrate that cleanup objectives of
1,000 mg/kg TPH (diesel) had been achieved. These samples were similarly screened for TPH by
EPA Method 418.1 and the results indicated 41 of the. 109 samples contained TPH levels greater
than 1,000 mg/kg. As required by the cleanup objectives, those samples containing TPH greater
than 1,000 mg/kg were analyzed for TPH (diesel) by EPA Method 8015, a gas chromatography
method specific to identification of diesel and other petroleum hydrocarbon fuels in the Cio to
C30+ range. EPA Method 8015 results indicated each sample to be less than 100 mg/kg TPH
(diesel). These results indicate the cleanup objectives have been met.
Relative to your inquiry as to the nature and source of the TPH detected by the EPA 418.1 test,
this material consists of not only TPH (diesel), but also includes residualbiomass and heav3r
hydrocarbons in the C30+ range~ EPA Method 8015 is more specific to TPH (diesel) as it only
detects compounds up to C30~ range. The heavy hydrocarbons reported by EPA Method 418.1
are residual from the old No. 6 bunker fuel that was previously storeA at the site. and used in the
steam engines until the 1950s! Bunker fuel- is a v~n3r-thi~l~and viscous tar-like hydrocarbon:
containing heavy hydrocarbon'chains in the C40 to C150 range. These heavy hydrocarbons were
identified in the initial site characterization report in several borings drilled in the former location of
21 Technology Drive · lrvtne, California 92718 · (714) 727-9336
Ms. Dolores Gough 2 ' December 15, 1992
the fueling platform (refer to Table 4.2 in the Site Investigation Report Former Underground Diesel
Tank and Fueling Platform Area, August 1989). The residual heavy hydrocarbons do not contain
benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene (BTXE) and would not represent a health risk. Relative
to ground water, our original evaluation was based on a very conservative approach using fresh
diesel fuel (i.e. more mobile and more toxic than the heavy residual bunker fuel) and a worst-case
migration approach which assumed the diesel would reach ground water and become dispersed at
maximUm solubility(i). Even that conservative evaluation showed ground water resources would
not be significantly affected.
In reSPonse to your request regarding the remaining TPH levels at the bottom of the excavation,
Figure 1 shows the as-built footprint and elevation contours of the excavation along with the
TPH concentrations from the excavation bottom and sidewalls. Per the approved remediation
plan, the soils were excavated to a depth of 10 feet to avoid impacts to future site excavations
and/or development. Additionally, the "hot spot" containing elevated levels of lead was excavated
to a depth of 12 feet. Bottom sampling of the "hot spot" confirms the remaining levels of lead are
well below the cleanup level of 500 mg/kg. The lead analysis results are also shown in Figure 1.
Based on the results presented in our November 10, 1992 Status Report and the above information,
it is our opinion that the remediation of the soil at the railyard is. compete. The TPH has been
reduced to less than 100 mg/kg TPH (diesel) and the residual heavy hydrocarbons (i.e., residual
from Old No. 6 bunker fuel) detected by EPA Method 418.1 do not represent a risk or threat.
Upon your approval, we will proceed with backfill, compaction, and final grading of the site.
We sincerely hope this information addresses your concerns. Please call if you have any questions
or comments.
Very truly yours,
TCL:dls
Attachment: Figure 1
cc: M.E. Hardin, Santa Fe Railway Company
M. Eaton, Environmental Solutions, Inc.
(1) Detailed Soil Remediation Plan, Chapter 3.0 Health Risk Assessment, dated November 1990.
Lead.Investigation Results and Clarification Supplement to the Detailed Soil Remediation Plan,
dated March 1991.
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Address: 21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
Date Samples Received : 9-24-91
Date Analysis Completed: 9-25-91
Date of Report : 9-26-91
Attn: Mr. Mike Leonard
Project Name:_ Sante Fe
Project ~: 91-172 D
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
(Oil and Grease)
sample ~ ID mq/kq MDL! mq/kq
3562 EX-1000-150 700. 5.0
3563 Ex-900-150 310. 5.0
3564 EX-800-150 ND 5.0
3565 EX-700-150 68. 5.0
3566 -EX-600-150 88. 5.0
3567 ~ EX-500-150 530. 5.0
3568 .EX-400-150 11000. 5.0
3569 EX-550-195 640. 5.0
3570 EX-750-180 310. 5.0
3571 .EX-400-210 2500. 5.0
3572 EX-450-180 520. 5.0
3573 - EX-450-210 5800. 5.0
3574 -'EX-650-195 73. 5.0
3575 EX-400-250 29. 5.0
3576 EX-500-250 740. 5.0
Method of Analysis: 418.1
ND = None Detected
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
MDL = Minimum Detection Limit
An~g~la Horton
Analytical Chemist
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623