Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHAZ-STATUS REPORT 8/14/1995~ ~? '~¥Z'Groundwater Scientists · Environmental Consultants To: Mr. Herman Fuette ~~ ,~ By~ . Manager - Security and Building Se~ices -~'-=~ Automobile Club of southern California R O. Box 2890 Los Angeles, CA 90051 From:' AquaGeosciences, Inc. 4440 Grissom Street, SUite 100 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Ref.- Quarterly Project 'Status Report (PSR) of Soil Remediation Operations at the "Former Automobile Club of Southern California" located at 2301 "F" Street in Bakersfield, California. Dear Mr. Fuette: This report documents the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) activities at this site performed to date by AquaGeosciences, Inc. (AGI)o AGI submits this report as per your request and in compliance with applicable site permits. AGI monitors the Vapor Extraction System (VES) and associated equipment in accordance with San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) conditions. Furthermore, AGI performs additional monitoring actions to ensure understanding of the progress of this site's soil remediation. These activities include: Monthly measurements of influent and effluent vapor streams for VOC's, with a PID or an FID instrument; and weekly routine maintenance, gauge and instrument readings, and equipment checks. These.pedodiq and on-going activities allow AGI to monitor the sYstem completely and efficiently. The following summary identifies the tasks performed by AGI in order to implement the Remedial Action Plan specifications and those conditions mandated by site-specific permits issued by the responsible regulatory agencies: · In late March 1995, AquaGeosciences,lnc. was contracted by the Automobile Club of Southern California to construct, operate and maintain a Vapor Extraction System at the subject site. · By mid May 1995, AGI completed the construction of the VES system and implemented normal start-up procedures to insure proper and long term system performance. 4440 Grissom Street, Suite 100 ° Bakersfield, California 93313 (805) 836-8100 ° FAX (805) 836-8800 (800) 30142~44 · On June 5, 1995, AGI, bY request from and in the presence of Ms. Kris Estill of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD), collected two Tedlar bag samples. Samples were collected from the influent and effluent vapor streams. Calculations, based on analytical test results, yielded a VOC's destruction efficiency of approximately 98.3%. · Field PI D readings taken on June 8,. 1995, of both influent and effluent vapor streams, resulted in the calculation of a destruction efficiency to be approximately 99.8 % · Based on: a) Analytical test results of the monthly Tedlar bag samples of influent and effluent vapor streams; b) Chamber and Stack temperatures; and c), An estimated quantity of gasoline contamination of approximately 5,000 gallons, a quantitative estimate of this system's performance is as follows Average influent VOC's concentration = 1,715 ppmv Average Flow = 235 SCFM Average Amount of gasoline extracted = 16gals/day Operation Time = 75 days Approx. Amount of Gasoline extracted = 1,200 gallons .With an average VOC's destruction efficiency of approximately 98.3 %: Daily Potential of VOC's Emission = 1.57 lbs/day the above 'calculations reveal that the system is functioning in compliance with the ATC conditions, excePt for the average flow which is above the maximum of 200 SCFM. But, the modest flow rate increase still resulted in higher VOC's destruction efficiency and lower daily Potential Emission (PE) than permit limits. However, AGI will reduce future flow rates to below ATC limit. AGI's conclusions are as follows: 1. Quantitative field data indicate that this system is still an economical and effective choice for soil remediation at this site; and 2. AGI's estimate that soil remediation leading to possible site closure, based on past system pedormance, will be completed in approximately two hundred and twenty five days. However, since this system has been operating for a short period of time, a more representative estimate should be arrived at after three to four months of continuous system operation. AGI's recommendation is as follOws: · Continued operation of the existing Vapor Extraction System. If you have any questiOns regarding this correspondence, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at (805) 836-8100. Respectfully submitted, han A.. B/ahr Project Engineer Pr/ncipa/,/Hydrogeologist , AAA-Bakersfield ' 5 o o o ~.:.?.t:.~.~. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4500 ~ ......... o, , Approximate gasoline 4000 ~...~l|q~' extraction curve 3500 · I I 3000 I ~"' 2500 I \ 2000 1500 1000 500 t ~'~ 0 t t I ~ I I I I I I I Ill I I I ] I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I [ I t t t I I [ I ~y~ from Pro]eot ~a~ The Automobile Club of Southern California Attachment 1 AquaGeosciences, Inc. Project Status Report August 1995 5/17/95 Thru 7/31/95