HomeMy WebLinkAboutHAZARDOUS WASTE
.... Permit ~do. '3
_.- CITY OF BAKE, i FIELD .ij_'/.'~Lj_- ~'~~C;'
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (805) 326-3979
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SITE IN FORMATION ~
SITE ADDRESS ~0~ ~OLF ~ ZIPCODE q~30a ~N
FACILITY NAME ~LE~ CR~ ~E~ CROSS STREET ~l~ ~ 'd/
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~,g ~¢1~ ~L ¢0, PHONE NO. ~ 22- ~0~3
MAILING ADDRESS ~0 ~ ~69 CitY ~aK~6f~ ZIP q338o
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
COMPANY C-gL ~/aLLE.'V ~O[l(P~gn~' PHONENO. 32,9-~5~/1 LICENSENO.
ADDRESS 3~~ ~J~ AVE . , CI~-~KE~ ~ ZIP~
INSURANCE CARRIER ~¢g~ WO~NS COMP NO.
PRELIM INARY ASSESSMENT IN FORMATION:
COMPANY
ADDRESS 2,0 1'2_ ~.ITOAClNO tqOF_. CITY i~E~'~L~. ZIP ~g.-'~
INSURANCE CARPaER Va~lWa~ ~ 0~-t..."1~068~6 WOmOaENS COMP NO. /.9'3 6q ~$ -9'7
TANK CLEANING INFORMATION
COMPANY t~ ERN Et/VIR0t4t~NT~I_
ADDRESS ~ 0 ~'K ~ S~'~, CITY
WASTE TRANS~R~R IDENTIFICATION ~ER ~ ~q ~ ~
NAME OF RINSA~ DIS~SAL FACILI~ Las ~ mas
ADDRESS ~IZ~ ~T~~ ~ C[~~~.
FACILITY IDE~IFICATION NUMBER
PHONE NO. ,_~'~c~
TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
COMpANy KVS '"~O, Nc~poR'T~-TIOKI PHONE NO. ~-5Z~ ~.LICENSE NO.
TANK DESTINATION ~~ ~ ~~
zip ~
zip
zip
TANK INFORMATION
TANK NO. AGE VOLUME
I ,t-_Z I q vrs I0,
H o.3
~g. o0o
CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL
STORED STORED PREVIOUSLY STORED
G fl_501a~ E. J '::/')q - 19ct9 /Vo/vE.
O_-,R..~b'n £ I q 97 - Iffq 7 HO/Y, ff
(~s6'~or-~ F'h ~L jqq~t - t qq'lNave.
D,E..~t. ~-UtSL lq&g-Iq~i2 NO~E
k I q Yrs. z OOO OIL,. F,,ronicia~
TI I1'.: Al'PI .ICANT I IAS RI~,C[{IV[.,'I), UNDERSTANDS, AND WILl, COMPI,Y WITII TI.IF,' A'I'rAcI Il{I) C()NI)['I'I( }NS OF TI ils
Iq(RM[I' ANI ) ANY OTI II.;R gTATI'L' I.OCA[, AND [.'[.~I)I".RAI, REGULA'rlO~S. '
TI IlS Iq )RM I IA.q I W.F.N C()MIq,I~,TI'.'I) [INI)F,R I'ENA[,'FY OF PERJURY, AND TO TI IE [~~I'RI II.'.
ANI ) C¢ )I{RI!C'I'.
AI'I'i:i'C,~N'I' ~AMI'.' (PRINT) ~___APPI'.ICANT SI---~;NATURI'.'
THIS APPLICATION BECOME A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
OVElC~.~.AO ELECTRIC
~OWER
f 700 Flower Stree. I. '
Bakersfield, California 93305-4198
Telephone '(805) 861-3621
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR'~ ,vlENT
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D.
Director ol Public Health
Air Pollution Control Otflcer
.~ ?~ . February 11, 1988
;:~ ': ';T:"Central Valley Nater Quality Control Board '~. '.: ..
:~" "'-'}'~',(:.Attn: · Tim Garrison Y,.::.~. '~'~'- .'[ .. '.:'! ...:..' "~-~':.' "( "~
-'- 0014 'E. ~shland ,, -
Fresno, California 93726
Re:
Groundwater Contamination-Around Davies
3305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield, California
Oil
Dear Mr. Garrison
This letter is written to update your files on groundwater
Investigations performed' at or around Davies 0il Company, 3305
Gulf Street, in Bakersfield, California.
An underground waste oil tank was removed from Fleet Wholesale
Tire in July, 1987. Oil and grease concentrations in the soil
were high enough to trigger a necessary assessment. The
assessment wa's completed, and since groundwater was so Shallow, a
groundwater monitoring well was installed at tile site, !'The soil
samples ~etrieved during assessment, did~not show any slgnlflcant
soil contamination between the tank bottom and groundwater. The'
groundwater samples did show
contaminatl°n. The contamination
other than the waste oil tank site.
trace amounts
appears to be
of gasoline
from a source
A Proposition 65 form has been completed, an'd a copy of the
assessment report is enclosed.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(805) 861-3636.
Sincerely, ~.
Environ e~/~)ntal Health S.~re~ialist,
Hazardous ~taterials ~Ianagement P~ogram
AEO/gb
Facility
.PTO #
'FILE GONTENTS INVENTORY. :~,
Date ~pp. ~ate #of Tanks Plot Plan ~-~
":" '.> Correspondence - Received ~'. ....
Abandonment Permit #.&~-_~_ Date ~ App. Date ~ #of Tanks /
Modification Permit # .Date Appl. Date
":Amended Permit GOnditions " : -': . <.-- '.
Annual Report Forms :' '"" '
......... b'0py"0f W=~t'ten -G°nt'ract Between Owner :& Operator
Correspondence - Mailed
Sampling/Lab Reports -.
MVF Gompliance Chec~(New Construction Ghecklist)
~TD Gompliance Gheck (New Gonstruction Gheckl-its)
MVF Plak--Check (New Construction)
STD Plan Gheck (New "~" '
Gou. stru~t~on) " "'
MVF Plan Gheck (Existing Facility)
"STD'plan Check (Existing FaCility)
"Incomplete Application" Fc?m
Permit Application Ghecklist
Permit Instructions ~2~. ~O
Tightness Test Results
Monitoring Well ConstrUCtion Data/Permits
Date
Date
Date
Date
Environmental Sensitivity Data:
, ~roUndwater Drilling, Boring Logs
Location of Water Wells
~.~ ................... L_._.Statemen.t.~o~=Undergrou~d_~on~its
Date
Date
Date
Discarded'
Date
Date
Date
Plot ·Plan Featuring Al/ Environme~tally~Sensitive Data
Photos Gonstruction Drawings Location:
Half. sheet showing date-re_ceived and t'allv of inspection time, etc
'- ' - - -
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1700 FLOWER STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
TELEPHONE: (805) 861-3636
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT,
RECONSTRUCT, DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL
CT
AP N:
10/9/87
APPLICATION DATE
10/19/87
PROPOSED STARTING DATE
10/20/87
PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE
OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
Fleet Wholesale Tire
3305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield~ CA 93308
HOME PHONE NO.(805)871-8331
WORK PHONE NO.(805)325-1 261
' CONTRACTOR
· ADDRESS
Krazan and Associates
3860 N. Winery
Fresno, CA 93726
SUBCONTRACTOR '
ADDRESS,
LICENSENO. C57-499908
PHONENO.(209)291-7337
LICENSE NO.
T 29S R 27E SEC 23 hOACRESUB. NE/4
JOB SITE:
DIRECTIONSTOWELLSITE: East of Pierce Road on south side Gulf Street
Well located directly behind garage on west side
TYPE OF WORK DONE:
(CHECK ONE)
NEW WELL [] DEEPEN []
RECONSTRUCTION [] DESTRUCTION []
INTENDED USE: DOMESTIC/PRIVATE
DOMESTIC/NONPUBLIC
DOM ESTI C/PUBLI C
TEST HOLE
MONITORING
CATHODIC PROTECTION
OTHER
[] (1 Connection) CONSTRUCTION METHOD:
[] (2-4 Connections)
[] (5 or more connections)
[] DEPTH TO WATER:
ROTARY' []
CABLE TOOL []
BORED []
OTHER Hollow Stem Auger
16 feet
SEALING MATERIAL
(CHECK ONE)
NEAT CEMENT [] w/3% Bent
CEMENT GROUT []
CONCRETE []
PUDDLED CLAY []
OTHER
GRAVEL PACK (CHECK ONE)
YES [] NO []
· FROM 13 f~o 25 ft
FROM TO~
PROPOSED CASING
DIAMETER 2"
CONDUCTOR:
YES ':E] NO []
TYPE Stai n,1 ess
DEPTH 25'
GAUGE/WALL
PROPOSED WELL DEPTH:
MAx 26 FT MIN 25 FT
PENETRATES 2 OR MORE AQUIFERS
YES [] NO []
PROPOSED PERFORATIONS OR SCREEN
FROM 15' .TO - ' 25 FEET
FROM .TO FEET
FROM TO FEET
PROPOSED SEALS/PLUG(S)
ANNULAR Pelletized Bentonite
OTHER
FROM
FROM
13 TO l0 fEET
TO FEET
[SEE REVERSE]
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Permit applications must be submitted to the Planning Department for zoning, access and flood plane clearances prior to
submission to the Health Department.
2. Permit applications must be submitted to the Health Department at least 10 working days prior to the proposed sta~ing date.
3. Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is Lmlawful to continue work past the
stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed.
4. Other required inspections inclLJde: setting c°nd0ctor casing, E-Logs, all annular seals, and final construction features,
5. In areas where a well penetrates m~rethan~neaquifer~and~ne~i~m~re~ftheaquifersc~ntainsp~rqua~itywater~an E-Log
shall be required to determine the location of the confining clay layer(s).
6. A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the daythat work is to commence and 24 hours before the
placement of any seals or plugs.
7. · Approval of water quality and final construction features are required before the well is put into use, and before a Permit
Number is released to Building Inspection Services,
Construction under this Permit is~.subject to any instructions by Department representatives.
9. Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "Stop
Work Order,"
10. A copyofth~ Department of Water Resources'Driller's Report aswellascopiesof E-Logs and water quality analyses must be
submitted to the Health Department within 30 days after completion of the work.
11, "Dry"holes must be properly destroyed within two (2) weeks of drilling. A well destruction application must befiled with this
Department.
12. The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and reasonable
progress toward completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
13. The Job Card shall be posted and remain at the well site available for the inspector to sign it off.
14. Lead pipe shall not be used in construction of any private or public water supply system.
15. The use of solders containing more than 2/10 of 1% lead is prohibited in making joints and fittings in any p~ivate or public
potable water system.
16. I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE
ZONING
zONE
ACCESS APPROVAL: YES [] NO
FLOOD PLAIN APPROVAL REQUIRED:
APPLICATION APPROVED BY
DISAPPROVED BY
REASONS FOR DENIAL OR CONDITIONS:
YES
SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
[] NO []
DATE:
DATE
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS Of PERMIT OR REASONS FO',R DENIAL:
E-LOG REQU,RED: YES L---] NO ~, ~
GRAVEL CHUTE REQUIRED: YES [] NO
RECEIPT ~ CASH ~
17(;0 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM'"T HEALTH OFFICER
Division of Environmental Health Leon M Hebartson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Well Permit Application Vernon S. Reichard
Parcel No,
AD
LOCATION Assessor's Parcel No.
INDICATE BELOW THE EXACT LOCATION OF WELL WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: PROpERTy_ .......
LINES, WATER BODIES-OR WATER COURSES, DRAINAGE PATTERN, ROADS, EXISTING WELLS, SEWERS AND
PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS.
.
LOCATION OF WELL IN SECTION LINES. LOCATE WELL BY
MEASURING FROM PROPOSED WELL SITE TO TWO (2) SEC-
TION LINES OR %SECTION IF A ROAD(S) BORDERS THE
LAND. THE MEASUREMENT(S) SHOULD ALSO BE MADE
FROM THE CENTER OF THE ROAD.
,q' One Mile
Health 580 4113 306 EH ([Rev. 5/87) (Pg. 3 of 3) ~ ?..
L,,.!
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305 ..
Telephone (805) 861-3636
' *' 'Fleet Wholesale Tire '
~". '.*, 3305 Gulf Street
· " Bakersfield, California
" 'KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
.'August 20, 1987
93308
Attn: Mr. Levctoni
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebe~son, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
Re:
Soil Contamination Beneath the 300 Gallon Waste 011 Tank
Located at 3305 Gulf Street in Bakersfield, California
Dear Hr. Levciont:
The laboratory results received on August 7, 1987, received
show sol! contamination in the samples retrieved below the 500
gallon gasoline tank. To evaluate the extent of contamination
present in that area you must prepare a site characterization
proposal.
This department does not approve of any additional work in the
area around the contamination either in defining the plume or
providing a permanent cover at the site until the site
character'~zation is approved by this'department.
The department;'s outline for preparation of the site ,
characterization proposal Is enclosed. It may be used as a guide
_ in preparing the proposal. Please submit your proposal to~. this
department wi'thin 30 days.
If your 'have any questions Please call me at (805) 861-3636.
..................... : ............................................ Hazardous ~a't~'rials"H~nagea~nt Program
AgO:aa
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305-4198
Telephone (805) 861-3621
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
February 10, 1988
LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D.
Director of Public Health
Air Pollution Control Officer
· Davies Company Properties
6413 Valleyview Drive
Bakersfield, California
Re: Tank Removal at Fleet Wholesale Tire
3305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Sir/Madam
This is to advise you that this department .has reviewed the
project results for the subsurface contamination investigation at
Fleet Wholesale Tire, 3305 Gulf Street, in Bakersfield,
California.
Based upon the findings described in the report, this
department is satisfied that the assessment is complete and that
no significant soil contamination was detected below the waste oil
tank at the site.
Trace.. amounts of gasoline components were detected in
groundwater below this tank site. The 'components were not found
in the soil between the tank bottom and groundwater. The
components were not characteristic of the substance stored in the
tank. They'appear to be from a sourc.e other than the tank at thls
site. -
Davies is presently investigating groundwater contamination,
which originated from a gasoline source, south of this tank site.
Information collected and compiled in the Site Characterization
Report dated November 30, 1987, might be helpful as part of the
groundwater investigation. A copy of the report will be Sent to
the Central Valley Regional Waker 'Quality Contr~ol Board.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Ha. za~dou.,~ ~4atevlals ~an.a~emen~ P~o~vam
HEALTH OFFICER
>:* .' ... 1700 Flower Street
' ' Bakersfield. California 93305 *"" "
· · - ., ,*. ,." . ." ' EN~RONMENTAL HEAL~ DIVISION
· - "Telephone (~5) 861-3636 ~ : , ' - "', ~.','DIRE~R OF EN~RONMENTAL H~L~
'' . .:. ..- '-: , . - ; . .. :' .
',..-.:Uj~.:~ :. q;:J-/.'~. ~<?..~.~5~ ~yr ~.~;,. "'- .
.... ,~' '~'~ ~' '7-~.~'~-.C~-', ~:. '~:..'b; ~.e. ':
NAME/ADDRESS ,erties
"~; FOIl' CLosURE 'OF ,EI~IIT EXPIRES --
"- ~":" ~ ' - ~'.:. ~<!< -" :: ~ '? ~: C q~: ,, 7..~ ~,.
· ~' ~' "' '~'~:?'" DATE
'AT ABOVE
September '15
'4. '-All -Samples must ,be' analyzed...for ::?otal..:Srgantc halides~:~..otl':and .greas~,
2'~.6..'.':>~All.;/aPpltcablfl '-state ~!aws 'for :..hazardous wasEe dlspoSal,/:~Stra~.sportatton
......--:or'.-ltreatment mu~t be"a'dhere~ t~.':'.:,J-.The Kern County Health' DePh'~
" " 'ied before moving and/or "disp0s'tng of any
' - . · ". .... -~"ACCEPTE
DISTRICT OFFICES
KRAZA iN(- & ASSOCI ES, IN C.
Geotechnical Investigations , ~ ~
Environmental Engineering _
tmboratorv Soils Testing ,~
Monitoring Wells ~.~_~\ :./_/~/?r~j
September 21, 1987 .Pr°p°sal
i~'leet Wholesale Tire
i.J:i~305 Gulf Street ' · "''":
Bakersfield, California 93308 ~"' ~.,~i?~' i".,:.: .,'.:': i/: .... '
Attention M~. Ald'o Lencioni
RE: Preliminary Site Characterization Investigation
3305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield, CalifOrnia
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proPosal
for a site characterization investigation at the above-referenced projec~ site.
An estimated cost based in unit cost values is attached for your review.
[f you have any questions of 'if we can be of further assistance, please
do not hesitate to contact our office.
Respectfully Submitted,
' Jeffrey S. Palmer
· ,.. Environmental Specialist
NiE/JSP/ko
Michael Erwin
PrinciPal Engineer
R. CE #18625
i c herewith
Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337
Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 [] Visa/ia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383.3993
ESTIMATED PROSECT COST
12, hrs. Drilling ¢ $130.00/hr. $ 1560.00
L' Chemical Analysis:
:'"8 fox-total Lead & Oil & Grease ~ $250.00 ea. 2000.00
....... : ..... ~-~-, ....... ~L--&-EPA-60I:-602-Water Analysis ~ $195.00' ea.' .............................. i95.00
1 Ground water monitoring well (materials) 163.00
25 hrs. Project Administration, Permits, Engineering
Analysis ~ $55.00/hr. 1375.00
4 hfs. R, eport Preparation/Graphics ~1525.00/hr. 75.00
Estimated Cost
$5,368.00
KI~,AZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
KRA'ZAN' & ASSOCII'- TES, INC.
TestM , ~nd ration
Geotechnical Investigations
Environmental Engineering'
l.aborator~ Soils Testing
Monitoring Wells
September 21, 1987
Proposal
" '~Fleet Wholesale Tire '
.' ~' 3305 Gulf Street .-..'~ "." "*"
'. ....... i :; ........................ Bakersfield, California 93308 .................................................................................... ~-:
Attention: Mr. Aldo Lencioni
P,E: Preliminary Site Characterization Investigation
3305 Gulf Street, Bakersfield, California
Dear Gentlemen,
In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal
for a preliminary site characterization study at the above-refer'enced project
site. It was understood from information provided to this office that the site
characterization study was requested by the Kern County Environmental Health
Department after samples obtained from beneath a removed waste oil tank at
the project site had shown contamination present in subsoils.
PP, O3ECT HISTORY
The project site was currently developed as a wholesale tire outlet,
located at ]05 Gulf Street in Bakersfield, California.
lb is understood from information provided to this office' 'that the project
site was developed .with a private repair business until about i969. From 1969,
the project site was occupied by Davies Oil Distributors, where bulk drum and
quart oils were sold. In ~974 Fleet Tire Warehouse relocated to the project, site
from a Niles Street address, and at that time, steel structures and a canopy was
moved to' and erected on the site. The waste· oil tank was understood to have
been installed at that time to accommodate storage of waste petroleum products
from routine automotive repairs
Main Office: Fresno/Clovis * 3860 N. Winery * Fresno, California 93726 * (209) 291-7337
Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 [] Visa/ia (209) 625-8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993
Page No. 2
Proposal
In July of 1987, the waste 'Oil tanks was exhumed and removed from the
property. Soil samples were obtained from beneath the waste oil tank at that
shown contamination of subsoils by petroleum constituents.
No other information regarding the project site was available at the time
Of this proposal.
PURPOSE OF.. WORK
The purpose of the proposed investigation would-be to determine if ~he
contamination noted in subsoils was more significant that what ~'was disclosed
during initial sampling and chemical analysis conducted at the time of the waste
oil tank ~emoval. Additionally~ a preliminary determination 'of possible impact of
contaminants on ground water resources at the project site would be made.
SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The scope of the investigation would be generally limited to the area in
the immediate vicinity of the removed waste oil tank and. adjacent driveway
area at the project site. The scope of the investigation would generally be
limited to the drilling and sampling of subsoils at selected locations for
chemical analysis. Additionally, one ground water monitoring well would be
instailed in a down-gradient position to determine if contamination by petroleum
products was present in ground water in the vicinity of the previous waste oil
tank location. Soil and water samples would be subjected to chemical analysis to
determin~ presence and concentration of contamination. The data obtained from
the field and laboratory invest!gation would be utilized to help identify
exclusion boundaries for the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination in
subsoils,and possible impact to ground water,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIAYES
Page No;
Proposal
~ETHOOOLO~Y
In order to accomplish the goals established in the scope of the
investigation as outlined, it is proposed that the following methods would be
':'bmployed:
~l.. .A . total ...of four exploratory soil .bo~ings .would. be placed at--locations_around. ~'" · '
the previous waste oil tank as shown on the site map included at the end of~ the
text.
2. [n order to facilitate drilling in the immediate vic.inity of the remOved tank,
the tank removal excavation would need to be backfilled prior t° our field
investigation.
3. Each soil borings would be advanced to a maximum depth of 15 feet below
the existing grade. The maximum depth of 15 feet below grade was selected as
review of published data regarding depths to ground water in the vicinity of the
project site has shown ground water to exist at an approximate depth of 16 feet
below the existing grade,
4. Auger cuttings from the exploratory soil borings would be repl.aced into the
bore'holes upon completion of each hole. A plug consisting of sand cement with
approximately' 3% bentonite would be placed in the top 3 feet of each hole.
5. Should ground water be encountered in any of 'the four soil borings'; each
boring would be backfilled to grade with a cement-bentonite slurry.
6. Soil borings would be advanced by means of a truck mounted drilling rig,
utilizing hollow stem auger, o
7, Soil samples are anticipated to be obtained at depths of lO and 15 feet below
-the"b~isting grade at~-'each' boring lOcatioiq~
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
Page No.
Proposal
8. Soil samples would be obtained by means of pushing stainless steel tubes at
discreet intervals.
9. One ground water monito[ing well would be placed at a location shown on
the site map at the end of the text. The well would be located in a
doWn-gradient position (as deter~nined from literature review of published data
'i
and work ., accomplished in the area of the project site regarding ground water
.......... gradien~..and ..conditions)_ from ~he tank. remoVal.-,si~e. I~ is anticipa~ed-'~hat'
well would be constructed of Schedule 40 flush-thread P.V.C well pipe to an
approximate depth of 15 feet below grade, and completed with .020" slot
stainless steel 2" diameter well screen from 15 to 25 feet below grade. The well
would be installed through hollow-stem-auger, with a filter media consisting of
#J. 6/2 clean sand. A annular seal composed of bentonite (pelletized) would be
placed above the filter media screened interval to an approximate thickness of
3 feet. The well would be finished from the annular seal to the surface ' with a
sand-cement grout', where a locking, water tight surface vault would be
installed.
The well would be developed by means of surge block and bailing, with an
equivalent of ] to 5 well volumes being removed prior to sampling. Water from
well development would be barreled on-site pending results of water chemical
analysis. Samples would be obtained from the well by means of a Te'flon bailer.
The water sample would be decanted to a Volatile Organics Analysis vial and
transported to a laboratory for analysis.
10. All samples would be collected, maintained and transported under chain of
- custody protocol to a state-approved laboratory for chemical analysis; Soil
samples would be analyzed to detect the presence and concentration of Total
Organic Halides, Total Lead and Oil and Grease. Water samples would be
subject to EPA 601-602 analysis.
11. A literature survey of published ground water data in the 'vicinity of the
project site would be conducted to generally describe the hydrologic
......................... ~environment-; ................ :
KRA'ZAN & ASSOCIATES
Page No.
Proposal
12~ Upon completion of the field ~nd laboratory investigation, a detailed report
would be compiled presenting the findings of our investigation.
All necessary permits would be obtained prior to the commencement of the
" 'field investigation.
> We would be in a position to begin the field portion of the investigation
'. within three working days of notification of your and Kern County : .i
....... Environmental Health Department. acceptanee.~ of our pr. oposed .-investigation~- It' is ...... ~-'~-~'": "'~-
" anticipated that the field portion of the investigation would take about Z days~
'"¥ providing the existing open excavation were backfilled. Results of the chemical
analysis would be expected approximately two weeks following the completion
of the field portion of the investigation. The final report should be available for
review approximately two weeks following receipt of the results of chemical
analysis~ however, verbal results could be made available sooner.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to submit this proposed work
plan for the subject property.
If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do >
not hesitate to contact our office.
.]SP/MRE/jp
2c herewith
lc Kern County Health Dept.: Amy Green
Respectfully Submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATE5
,)effrey 5. Palmer
Environmental Specialist
Michael P,. Erwi~
Princip al 'Engineer
RCE 1118625
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
._.'~ _~_.=u'r~uT¥ ~'0~-,' GULF STREET .......
I OEPTIC TANK
J ~~ OFF~E
I ..
I
I
~- Exploratory soil boring locations
~- Proposed monitoring well location
.................... NOT -TO ~5C~-L'E ........................ =
from IT Copt. map dated
09/10/87
PR0~0S[B SIll C,~RaCI[RI~~: none. ~t~: 9-23-87 ~~ K~ZAN & ASSOCIATISS
ZATION INVESTIGATION ~O~w. b Approved
FLEET ~HOLESALE TIRE v~taff dP Merged Frexno Visalia Bakerxfieid
3305 GULF STREET I ~oject Ho. Drawin~ No.
RA~Dq~TDI B CAI TD~D~ITA ID~rnl 1 ~
ALDO LENCIONi .
P.O. Box 2828
Bakersfield, CA.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
17OO FLOWER STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
(805) 861-3636
INTERNAL
· OF TANKS TO BE AB~DONED ,
LENGTH OF PIPING TO ~A~ON
APPLICATION F~R PERMIT FOR PERlVIA. NENT
CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND
HAZ,~a~.DOUS $UBST~NCES STORAGE FAC ILI TY
PROJECT CONTACT Aldo J.Lencioni c/o -F]eet Wholesale Tire
FACILITY N~E
Davies Oil Comvany. Inc.
~ER
'DaVies company Properties
HAYS- (805) 325~1261
NIONTS- (_805) 871--8331
~0~ G S'~¥~t °~
"'/' ,' 6413 ~alleyview Drive'
(RURAL LOCATIONS ONLY)
NEAREST CROSS STREET
Pi ~_rc~ Rnnrl
PHONE ' -
'¥~805 )87i '-833i'
RmOW CONTRACTOR Z.T. Cor I DREss
interna[ional Technol~qy Cor~. 2701 Patton Way
0~-"0~-~, 1137422 A - '~[ WC495-7~-14
PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT CONTRACTOR
I. T. ~ Corp
.OR~ER' S/~MPENHATION ·
WC495-71-14
PHONE . .
: ."r- (805)589 -9383
.[INSDRERNational Union ..~ire
Birminqham Fire.
ADDRESS ~ ~
2701 Patton Way Bksfld.,ca
INSURERNational Union Fire Ins.~
Birmingham ' Fire.
LABORATORY TRAT WILL ANALYZEi SAMPLES ADDRESS i / ~' : '
B. C. ~ Labs'''
· 4100 Pierce Rd.
PHONE "i
8o5 589
PHONE ) --- t : '
"''(213 552 87'00
(805 327 4911
,j
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MATERIALS STORED , -
TANK · VOLUME ~ CHEMICAL STORED (NON-COMMERCIAL NAME) .,,
~ ;. : DATES STORED
I 300 gal. Waste. Oil I .~~0~
i. ~- ........ : .....~ TO
} TO
i ..,,., -"; TO
CHEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STOREI
I.
WATER TO FACILITY PROVIDED BY ' '
NEAREST WATER WELL - GIVE DISTANCE AND DESCRIBE TYPE IF WITHIN 500 FEET
No Well Within 500'~'~
SOIL__.TYPE AT FACILITY,, .* ." ._, ~'~
Medium Sand'~e 3 or bette
K'.C. Water Agency .. , ~
TOTAL HUMBER OF SAMPLE TO BE ANALYZED [SAMPLES WILL BE ANALYZED FOR: ' '~
2' 'Jell and Grease, Tox'. Lead .4,
........ .. /,~ ~;~' ~
DESCRIBE HOW RESIDUE IN T~K(S) ~D PIPING IS' TO BE REMOVED ~D DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE T~NSPORTATION ~D DISPOSAL COMPANIES).,:
Hydro wash' X 3 ~ith Rote - Jet, Vacuum ou~_ and Tr~spb~'t/qiA' ~,~.. Corp.~t0 PP,
DESCRIBE BOTS THE DISPOSAL METHOD AND DISPOSAL LOCATION FOR: i " r' '~
TANK(S) .
Abandonment in Place "~
PIPING · ~ ~
* * PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE .SIDE OF THIS SHEE NG APPLICATION FOR REVIEW * *
TNIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE 'A~D CORRECT.
Annabel Lencioni ".
(Form tHl~iP-140)
~ OF THE FOI. J.D~.ING "INFOPaMATION MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDER FOR APPLICATION TO BE
PROCESSED: ....
-- I TANK(S), PIPING & DISPE~SER(S), INCLUDING LENGTHS AND DIMENSIONS
~ PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATIONS DESIGNATED BY THIS SYMBOL "~"
~ NEAREST STREET OR INTERSECTION ,;~ ~:~-.'~ ,.
DP~] N--O ~ L
· ·PRIVATE :.
DRIVEWAY .,'-
BLD6.
43'
DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER
UNCONFINED AND EQUIVALENT
WELLS USED FOR CONTROL
SPRING ~386
[]Permit to Operate
[~Construction Permit
~Amended Permit Conditions
~Permit Application Form,
~Application to Abandon
~Annual ~eport Forms
FILE CONTENTS
INVENTORY
Date
Da te
=~0 f :--Tanks ......... Da~t.e .....
Tank Sheets.,
tanks(s)
Flow Chart
Date
.of Wr. itten..._Contract__Between__O.wner_.&.-_.Operator. '
Da te
Da te
Date
[]Inspection Reports
[]Correspondence - Received
[]-]Correspondence - Mailed
Date
Date
Da te
[-]Unauthorized Release Reports
[]Abandonment/Closure Reports
[-]Sampling/Lab Reports
[]MVF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
[-~STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
E]MVF Plan Check (New Construction)
[]STD Plan Check (New Construction)
[-]MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility)
[]ST• Plan Check (Existing Facility)
•'Incomplete Application" .Form
[-]Permit Application Checklist
[~Permit Instructions [']Discarded
E]Tightness Test Results
[] Monitoring
Well Construction Data/Permits
Date
Date
Date
E]Environmental Sensitivity Data:
~]Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs
[-]Location of Water Wells
[-]Statement of Underground Conduits
[]Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
•Photos [~Construction Drawings Location:
I-]Half sheet showing date received and tally .of inspection time,
E]Mi-~c. el..-La~n e o-~ s~
etc
Kern County Health Department
Division or Environmental Hea~e~
1700 Flower Street, BakerJfiel'. CA
93305
Application ~.,. ~
" APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Type 9.f.. Application (check):
I-]New FaCility [']Modification'of Facility ~Existing Facility [']Transfer of Ownership
A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area Code, p~one): Days Dave Canfield 805-325-5171
Nighf's
.... Facility Name Flee~"-Tire ........... ' ........ -"~--:' ............ "'~'-'~-'~' ............ No. of 'Tank-~''-~':=':~=-' ............. ' ........'
Type of Business (check): [~Gas~i-ine Station pOther (deSCribe) Tire company
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [']Yes ~]No
Is Tank(s) Used Prima~r.i~ly,f_or_ ~Agricult.ural Purposes? ~Yes [-~No
Facility Address 33UD~bulf Street Nearest Cross St. Pierce Road
T -~ R SEC (Rural Locations ~ly)
Owner Davi~s Company Properties Contact Person Rick DaVies
........... ]%ddress 3305~ Gulf" Stfe'e{ Z.i_p 93308 Telephon. e, 8.05-323-6063 ....
Operator Fl'eet' T~re Contact Person Dave Canfield
.. .Address 33'ub ~u'~t'~ ~treet Zip 93308 Telephone 805-325-5171
Water to Facility Provided by California Water serv. Depth to' Groundwater "20 ft'.
Soil ~naracteristics' at Facility Sandy
Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Determinations estimat~e~
Contractor
Address
Proposed sta~tin~ Date
Worker's Ccmpensation Ce~ttfiCation
CA Contractor's License No.
Zip Telephone
proposed t~pI~'tion ~te
Insurer
D. If This Permit Is. For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly:Describe Modifications
Proposed
Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
Tank t Waste Product Motor Vehicle
1
~uel
[] [] O O
[] [] [] O
O [] 'D D
O.. O D Fi
Unleaded ~e~ular Premium Diesel Waste
Chemical C~mposition of Materials S~ored (not necessary for motor vehicle fuels)
Tank $ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) CAS'~ (if kno~) Chemical ~reviously. Stored
: . (if dffferen~) "
Transfer of'Ownership
~ate of ~-an~fer Previous Owner
Previous Facility Name
· I, accept fully all 6b~i~ati°ns of Per~'i't NO. issued to
· I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and
modif~ or terminate 't~he tranSfer of the Permit to .~_rate this ~dergro~d storage
~'i~t~'- ~o~-~-~ ~ i~ --~h f~'-~6~le te~' "'fO-~'~
This fora has been.~.~pleted under penalty of
Signature / ~ ~ .... /
and to the best of my knowledge is
Partner 8-14-86
Title · Date
'acility Name Permit No.
TANK ~' I (.?i:. (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR '. TANK)
' FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
1. Tank is: []Vaulted []Non-Vaulted [~FDuble-WalI ~Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
~Carbon Steel [-]Stainless Steel []Polyvinyl Chloride [i-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel
" []Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [qConcrete []Aluninum [][]Bronze []]]Unknown
[] Other (describe)
Dete Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. Tank Secondary Contair~nent
[]Do.u~le-Wall r=lsynthetic Liner r']Lined Vault ~None []Unknown
[]Otb. er (describe): Manufacturer:
r~Ma~erial Thickness (Inches) . Capacity. (Gals.),
............... '-'--~Rubber -[] Alkyd '~.F7 Epoxy ---FTPhenolic [] Glass [] Clay . [~lined .[]Unkno~
'~, []Other (describe):
10.
Tank Corrosion Protection -' -
.-~'~'Galvanized [~Fiberglass-Clad rTpolyethYlene Wrap []Vinyl Wrapping : . .....
'-['~Tar or' Asphalt - []Unknown ~None []Other (describe): '
Cathodic Protection:' []None []Impressed Current System Fl~acri~icial Anode System
Describe .S~sfe~ & Equil~ent:
Leak Detection, Monitorir~, and Interception,
a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) [2]Groundwater Monitoring' Well(s)
[]Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) : []U-Tube Without Liner
U-Tube With Compatible )i~ectin~
Vapor Detector* Sensor'
Liner £ i Flow to Monitoring We,Il(s)* '"
[] Liquid Level : [~ Conductivit~ Sensor
[] Pressure Sen~r in Annular' Space of Double Wall Tank-
[2] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space
Daily & Inventory Reconciliation [~ Periodic Tightness Testing
None ~au~ing
Unkno~ [] OCher
b. Piping: ~Flo~-Res~ricting Leak Detector(s) ~or Pressurized Piping~
I-1Monttorinq Sanp ~rith Raceway []Sealed Concrete Raceway
[] ItalY-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway [] SwmheCic Liner~ Raceway ~None
[]Unkno~ [] CYcher
· ?ightnes~ 'l~stc~:l? FlYes ll~'No FlUnkno~'~
Bate of ~.a~c ?i~htness Teac ltesulr.~ of Test
Test Name , Testing C~mpany
Tank Re~air
Tank Repaired? []Yes ~No
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
Overfill Protection
[]Operator Pills, Controls, & Visually Monitors f~vel
[]Tape Float Gau~e []Float Vent Valves [-~Auto Shut- Off Controls
B Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box ~None []Unknown
Other: List Make & ModeI For Above Devices
11. piping
a. Underground Piping: ~Yes []No [-~Unknown Mater~al
..................... Thickness .(inches) ............ Diameter ..............Manufacturer ...................
[]Pressure_ OSuction ~Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : .
~Galvanized []FiberglaSs-Clad :[qImpressed Current []Sacrificial Anode
[-]Polyethylene Wrap [qElectrical Isolation []Vinyl Wrap [-]Tar or Asphalt
~Unknown []None []Other (describe):
c. Undergrour~t Piping, Secondary Containment:
,'1
1700 Flower Street ..-'
Bakersfield, California 933.05 ' '
Telepho~ne (805) 861-3636
.', .~.:,~.~.,~,~,~.X~¥..: ~ ~ . .
,:~:: 'UNDERGROUND ~AZA~DOUS 8UBSTAN
-: ~ACILtTY. ' ' :' ": ' '"-'"~' ":' '"' %":~"/': ..... ' " ' S
~} i~ :FLEET T IRES ..: ~{?-": ;. ~.'i~':'-':'::~//~'~%:J'~-:7~.':~("~?~'~::l :?:"~ ':~''', DAVIES COMPANY. PROPERTIE
~i~ ~ ,.~o~ T ~T.n :' 'aa :;:~?.;~;.:~7~x',~r,,~"r.:.~f~::%'~ :'~;?l; ';,~'.'..~:; .:2 BAKERSFI ELD, .,~:~l
'KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT": HEALTH OFFICER
Laon M Hebertson, M.D.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL~EALTH
;'7.T :[ ~. tf;,,%.?~'[. ,., .... ~.:. 1 1 :.~,,~'T:?¥'.~:'
· ..' , '-."t .-';? ' . ' . ;'-
,' :' ~-'.;':';,~:':,-:'~:' ~t¥,'..-~ '~ ~f, t .... ' ,.~ ,'-, ,' ,:.::.;~i~'.'~::V~.':' '."~'
"*** POST -:'.ON .PREMISES
: ,..~ ~,, / ~.~.L,.'.~'.[~./;' .; ,. · ...
.,.:.%--';' . ',.. ,
' ' ":'
; · . . .- . .-~,~ ,',~: : -:.-...:_,~,...~, . ..
Norlally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many
Owners live out.side .Kern County, they may choose to have the 'permits
sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted..
.~lease fill tn Perlit $ and check, one of the followinE before
returning'this form with payment: : ~
,. ' 1. ,Send all Information to Owner at the address
-listed on invoice (if O~ner 'is different than :"-)" -i .,,-.:-.
" ' Operator; It ,will be O~ne~is responsibility
to provide Operator with pertinent
- Information).
2. Send all information to
following corrected address:
Owner at the
Send all Information to Operator:
Address: ~0 ~'~ ~-bg/_ ~
(Operator can ,make copy of permit
Owner). ~
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
' '. STATUS REPORT .'~.,
'-~..Removal of 'waste °il tank, ~oil.. -
........ ~ampling and analysis rep'~rt.
~3305 Gulf.St. Bakersfield, Calif .... '
. STATUS REPORT ~
Removal. of waste oil t~ank~ soil ........
sampling and analysis report.
~.-~3305 Gulf St. Bakersfield, Calif.
Submitted to:
Mr. Aldo Lencioni
Fleet Wholesale Tire
3305 Gulf St.
Bakersfield, CA. 93308
By:
International Technology Corporation
P.O. Box 3345
Bakersfield, CA 93385
INT'ERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
............... __~..=Augus_t~_6_,_ 1987
Project No. 260340
.Mr...~Aldo .Lencioni -' ' ............ ~'"~'"~z~ :~
'~3305 "Gulf St.
.Bakersfield, ~.~California .~ 93308 ~7C'i~.~.~. . ~'.~.- ~::-~
-Removal of waste oil tank, soil
sampling and analysis report.
3305 Gulf St. Bakersfield, CA.
-"De~-r Hr. Lenci0ni:~' ' .-; 7'.~~''~'~::.-, ~";'i~ ~'~:.-'" ~' ....
Based upon information gathered on ~he 3305 Gulf St. property, this
status report has been prepared to document the remedial activities,
removal of one(l) 550 gal. waste O~1 underground tank, soil Sampling
and analysis report along with a proposal to remove and dispose of
contaminated soil ...... ~.~ ~'~?'~.~:"~-~
REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES
On July 23, '1987, an I.T. crew consisting of one (1) field chemist,
and three (3) technicians excavated one (1) waste oil .tank along side
the Wes...~ end of the building at the North end of the entrance from
Gulf St. There was visible surface and subsurface oil tyPe conta-
mination down to two (2) feet with an oily odor.
One sample site, at the center beneath the tank was taken at a depth I
of two (2) feet and six (6) feet using EPA me~hod SW-846. The sampling
tool was 2¼" AMS stainless steel sl'eeved hand auger with a PVC -
incent and capped at both ends. Tool was decontaminated with distilled
water and (TSP) trisodium phosphate, rinsed and air dried. Soil
'samples were placed into two (2) 16 oz. wide mouth containers with
PVC outer coating and teflon lined lids. Samples packaged' in blue ice
and transported to BC Laboratory under documentation of chain of
custody. Samples were analyzed for oil and' grease, total halogenated
hydrocarbons (TOX), and lead, see Appen. Dis "A" Excavation site is
secrue, barricaded, and tapped. I
Regional Office
2701 Patton V~ay · Bakersfield, California 93308.805-589-4970
Page -2-
INTER~IONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PROPOSED REMEDIATION
-' B~'~"d -on. '-the -'~n~'iysis in --APpen~-ix' "A-
to have migrated beyond six (6) feet beneath the tank. We recommend
that further investigation to determine the extent of the existing
contamination and the rate of contaminant migration be done. We
"-wodld like to meet. with and discuss a plan of investigation with our
.,.eH'gineers that will be acceptable both to you'and the Kern County
~Environmental Health Department.
"Should you have any questions regarding th~s Statu~ r-ep6rt, please
~' Respectfully submitted~'~ ~'"'~
Supervisor/Field Chemist
cc: Kern County~ Health Department
DJM/kp
P
P
AG/II£LIL TU/I£
C~I£~ICA/ AiI/A~ YSlS
PETflOLEU~
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
I.T. Corporation Date Reported: 7/29/87
P. O. Box 3345 Date Received: 7/27/87
Bakersfield, CA . 9338S Laboratory No. L~14889
Attn: Duane Meadows P.O. #12376
:. TOTAL EX~llACT'CONT~I~AN~S~B¥ ACID DIGESTION'
·. :.~,', .~z - ': -: ~'~t .~[:.2:', .L-:,:. ' '.7- - :'-'" ' :' "-'~"'.-'.~' ' - ':-~]
' Sam~e ~escription: ~leet ~olesale,'~260~40;'L~H1-01 2' '~der"':~enter ~f tank '
..., l._./.l,.-~f~:,:.. .... ...... : -.. -..t...'~;,~ a ...... ~est s~de of bldg.;"7/24/87 ~ 11:30',..~,,~.-,
......... -'~ ' ~-";[?:.' 'L'T0tal' Metals~:'m~/kg'~' ...:c~-:---: .... ::-::r"'~= '-~'q-il~[ Method Reference
,~.- ~I .... -...-'. ~ h · .....
.... -.. :: ;:' ..'-.:['~timony ',':(:'i':::..~ ;*:~?'..",.:: :'?-:"':' ::. :': ':' ~t.. ;'?;:4-i.~: ':':"::~'t'[:7040 :~' ':':~:~-t~:t~:.l
,,..; ........ Arsenic ,,:,~ ,~ ..... ,, ...:..,..,~.,,~.~., , ....... 7061 , -I ..... ,- . 500. ....
. ~ Bart~ -: .~ .... ...-.:....-- . ~, .-.,,7080 . ..I ,. .... I0000.
Beryllium 210.1 2 75.
Cadmim .. 7130 1 ' 100.
Chro~ ~ .... : 7190 1- 2500.
'".."'.. .- ...~,- .-.,,,:-' 2
. :":" ..,-i.' :.' .' -~t." : O ~ ' '
' Cobble 1.1
._ '' ."-~-Copper , ~:., :~."?'~:':;~;(.".:~ :"" ' "(.--'..:, ~ "::~'"~';: }2 0.i .2
Mercury 7471 1 20.
Moly~enum 246.1 '* 2 . 3500.
. N~ckel . ' . 7520 1
Seleni~ ,7741 .. 1 100.'
Silver 7760 1 ~ 500.
~ Thallium 279.1 2 - 700.
Vanadi~ 286.1 2 2400.
Zinc 289.1 2 ' 5000.
Cyanides ~ 9010
Phenols '- 420.1 2 ':
Sulfides ' ' ' 9030
Fluorides 340.2 2
'Hexavalent Chromi~ 7196
Oil ~'Grease ~9237."
pM 9040 1
Pensky~rtens Flash Point' 1010 1
PCB' s 8080 1
T0X ' 24. 9020 1
Comment: ~1 contaminants reported ~bove are tn mg/'kg (unless otherwise stat~d) on
an as received (wet) sample basis. 'Results reported represent totals (T~C)
as Sample ~ubJ'ected to approPriate ~echntques to de'temine total levels."
(-) refers to "less than".
(1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 84g, JUly,' 1982.
(2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020
AGRI~UL TUR~
LABORATORIES, Inc.
-..... J.J. EGUN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
..... PETROL~U¥ ' ~' 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327~4911
I.T. Corporation Date Reported: .7/29/87
Date Received: 7/27/87
_ P. O. Box 3345 ,'
~ ......... ~+Bake~.s£i~ld~_C..A~9.~$SS ' ' ..... '. ".- · ~ Laborator~ No.: 14890
- . ~iamp~.e p · · · . , ' · -'~..:'~'~,' . ' '
......... id '-7/24/87 @ 11.40 --,.~ .... ~
Mercury .. , ~,:~ 246 · 1 2 3500.
~ /~ 2000 ·
..... ' Seleni~ * ·
'~ *' ' 279.1 2
.._ Thal 1t~ ' '286.1 2 2400.
Vanadt~
. : 289.1 "2 5000.
Fluorides 340.2 2 .
Mexavalent Chromi~ 7196 1
' , Oil ~ Grease 11,975.
pH :. 9040 1 * ..
Pensky-~rtens Flash Point 1010 1
8080 1
PCB ' s
TOX 52. 9020 1
Comment: ~1 contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless othe~ise stated) on
.. an as received (wet) sample basis.. Results reported represent totals .(TTLC)
" ..... . as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to dete~ine total levels.
(-) refers to "less than".
(1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", MW 846, July, 1982.
(2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020
J. J.~'Eglin
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER
·
SAMPLE TEAS MEMBERS ~, ~~'~'~' .'
CHAIN-OF-cusToDY RECORD
-j
R/A Control'.No.
Sample i Sample Date and Time Sample ., Container Condition on Receipt Disposal
Number i Location and Description " Collected : Type Type ., :i (Name and Date)! Record No.
~ ..
Special Instructions:
Possible Sample Hazards:
~iGNATURES: (Name,..(;;ompany, Dat~and Time)
Relin-uished By'"
i.~ -.., -.) · ,.,..
' ; , - -., :'-..)-/
2. Relinquished By:
Received B~': '
,;
WHITE o To accompany samples
YELLOW - Field copy
4. Relinquished By:.
Received By:'
,
FIEQUEST FOR ANALYSIS ~. :.,~t~ ~':"
"': ' ' ',' '
DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
LAB DESTINATION:' :'
LABORATORY CONTACT
SEND LAB REPORT TO
PROJECT N~MBER ~'~<~/O ,~x_.S) '.
PROJECT M~NAGER ~_,.~.
DATE REPORT REQUIRED
PROJECT CONTACT
PROJECT cONTACT P ON NO.
. sample N'O! Sample Type Sample Volume Preservative Requested Testing'Program i Special Instructions
r ~ , , J ' "" ' ,i '~
I, , ,
TURNAROUN[ TIME REQUIRED: (Rush must be approved by the. Project Manager.) -'. ;!, -'.
~ i., ~ Normal , ,.. Rush ~ (Sublect to rush surcharge) :.:
i "~ : '];' '-*
pOssIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if sample(s) are hazardous materials and/or suspected to cOntain high lev'els';of'hazardous substances)!
Nonhazard
SAMPLE DISPO~.AL:
Flammable Skin Irritant
(Please indicate disposition of~sample following analysis· Lab will charge for packing, shipping, ~nd disposal.)
Disposal I~y Lab ~
Return lo Client . ,
FOR LAB USEiONLY ....
Received By-': I ( ' ~L),~
; -~,~-'/L'J- ) '...~: i -"~.
WHI~E - Original, to accompany samples
YELLOW - Field copy '-.../
Highly Toxic
~Other
;t
Dale/Time ~-~.
/'-
(Please Specify)
· ' "' " '" *~"/'.' "* ""i:"' *'" *'" FLEET WHOLESALE TIRE
· ',.. ,.;...... ', .'.. ...~ ". · ..' .... *" .* '"" :. "./i-'-'. '.i-':~' '- .~"". ~*'.:' ''!''~"
'' : ;:,.:'i ;:'i (805) 325-1261 Bakersfield, CA 93303 '"; '~''' ',~' ~'' '~"~'"
Res. 871-~31
"K;RAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical Investigations
Environmental Engineering
Laboratory Soils Testing
Monitoring Wells
November 30, 1987 Proj. No. E87-084
F,l~et Wholesale Tire
3305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield, California 93308
Attention: Mr. Aldo Lencioni
Preliminary Site Characterization Investigation
3305 Gulf Street, Bakersfield, California
Gentlemen,
In accordance with your authorization, we have completed a preliminary
site characterization investigation at the above-referenced project site. The
attached report details our findings from that investigation
If there are any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do
not hesitate to contact our office.
2e herewith invoice
lc Kern Co. Environmental Health Dept.
Attn: Amy Green
P, espectfully .Submitted,
KRAZA~NI & ASSO:,~TES
Jeffrey S. Palmer
Environmental Specialist
.Michael R. Erwin.
Geotechnical Engineer
i~CE #18625/RGE#297
Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery ,, Fresno, California 93726 · (209) 291-7337
Bakersfield (805) 393~2343~F~Z~iN~I~ (2~$;[~b'TE~ Merced (209) 383-3993
Proj. No. E87-081
PRELIMINARY SITE CH. ARACTERIZATION INVESTIGATION
3305 GULF STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
November 30, 1987
Prepared for:
Fleet Wholesale 1-ire
3305 Gulf SLreet
Bakersfield, California 93308
KP, AZAN & ASSOC. IAI-ES
............................................................ T-ABLE-OF-CONTENTS
PRO3EC r HISTOP, Y
PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION
SCOPE OF, INVESTIGATION
TECHNICAL APPROACH
METHODOLOGY
SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Soil Profile
F~egional Hydrologic Conditions
Ground Water Conditions
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Table I
Table II
DiSCUSSiON OF FiNDiNGS
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM~vlENDATIONS
Conclusions
Recommendations
LhvlITATIONS ·
~EFERENCES
SITE PLAN ·
LOGS OF SOiL 8ORINGS
CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL REPORTS
WELL INSTALLATION DATA
Proj. No. E87-081
Page No.
2
2
3
3
5
5
5
6
7
8
8
10
10
12
Drawing No. 1
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
KRAZAN & ASS.OCIATES , IN C.
Construction Testinc and Ins ~ction
Geotechnical Investigations
Environmental Engineering
Laboratory Soils Testing
Monitoring Wells
November 30, 1987'
Proj. No. E87-084.
F,.,leet Wholesale 'Tire
]~305 Gulf Street
Bakersfield, California 93308
Attention: Mr. Aid0 Lencioni
RE: Preliminary Site Characterization Investigation
]Y~L15 Gulf Street, Bakersfield, California
Gentlemen,
In accordance with your' authorization, we have completed a preliminary
site characterization investigation for the above-referenced project site. It was
understood from informal:ion provided to this · office that the site
characterization investigation was requested by the Kern County Environmental
Health Department, after results of soil samples obtained from beneath a
removed waste oil tank had shown contamination present i'n subsoils.
PRO.]EC ¥ HISTORY
TEe project silo was located at 3305 Gulf Street in Bakersfield, California,
and was developed as a wholesale tire outlet.
Information provided to this office regarding the subject property indicates
the pcoperty was developed with a private auto repair business until about ].969.
From 1969, the project site was o~:eupied by the Oav'-ies Oil Distributors, where
bull< drum and canned quart oils were sold. In 197L~, Fleet. Tire Warehouse
relocated to the project site. At the time of the Fleet Tire occupation of the
property, steel structures and a canopy' were moved to the site from elsewhere,
and erected. The waste, oil tank was understood to have been installed at: the
rear of the transported building at the project site. The waste oil tank was
-utilized' to accommodate' the storage of Waste 'peti'-01e~}r~ 'p'{-'~)~lu-e'ts from 'the' auto
repair activities at the subject property.
Main Office: Fresno/Clovis · 3860 N. Winery · Fresno, California 9372~ · (209) 291.7337
Bakersfield (805) 393-2343 [] Visafia (209) 625.8251 [] Merced (209) 383-3993
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Page 2
Proj. No. E87-084
'tn 3uly of 1987~ a subsurface contamination assessment was conducted by .
Twin Cities Testing on an adjacent property. The assessment was conducted to
determine the extent of contamination in soils and ground water at the adjacent
property with regard to gasoline leakage at that site.
In 3uly. 1987, the waste oil tank was removed from the subject property.
Soil samples were obtained from beneath the waste oil tank at: the tim' of the
tank removal. The results of the chemical analysis ¢onducted on the soil samples
obtained from beneath the removed tank had shown contamination present in the
subsoi ts
Upon review of the results of the chemical analysis co~ducted'during the
tank removal, the Kern County Environmenta! Health Department requested .that
a preliminary site characterization investigation be conducted at the subject
property.
No other information was available regarding the history of the subject
property at the time of our investigation.
PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION
The purpose of the preliminary site characterization investigation was to
determine if more significant contamination was present in subsoils that what.
had been disclosed as a result of preliminary soil sampling which had occurred
at the time of the tanks removal. Additionally, a cursory observation of site
specific ground water conditions would be conducted to assess if Contamination
by waste oil 'products had impacted ground water resources at the project site.
SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The scope of the preliminary site characterization investigation was
limited to the area in the immediate vicinity of the removed waste oil tank,
which was located at the rear (south) side of the existing garage 'structure at
the subject property. The investigation was limited to the advancement of
exploratory soil borings, collection of sci[ samples, logging of subsoils, chemical
analysis of soil samples obtained, installation of a single ground water
monitoring well, and sampling of the ground water for 'che,T~iCal"analysi~
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, iNC.
* Page 3
.. Proj. No. EBT-t.]Sb,
TECHNICAL APPROACH
Th~ investigation at the project site was approached wi-th the rational
founded on information obtained regarding 't~'e ]-0~ation of the 'r~'~-v-~-tank,
historical depths to ground w~ter, regional ground water gradient and character
of the suspect contaminant. Inasmuch the tank removal excavation was open
prior to the investigation, the tank removal hole 'was baekfitted with clean soil
to allow drilling through the area which was directly beneath the removed tank.
Soil samples Would be obtain'ed' from that boring for chemical analysis;-and the
boring would continue into the ground water~ allowing installation of a
monitoring well. AddiLional borings would then be advanced and sampled at 90
degree intervals about the tank axis adjacent to the exiting sLructure~
approximately 5 feet from (he edge of the removal excavation. Those soil
borings and welt would provide samples for chemical analysis. The data obtained
from the drilling~ chemical analysis and literature survey would then be
analyzed to help determine the extent of contamination at the subject property,
within the scope of the investigation described.
The rational and technical approach were developed in consideration of the
suspect contaminant being a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, in a predominately
granular soil matrix, in close proximity to historical .ground water depths.
METHODOLOGY
tn order to accomplish the. goals established
investigation, the following methods were employed:
in the scope, of this
1. A proposed work plan was developed for the preliminary
investigation, and was submitted to the Kern County Environmental
Health Oepartment for approval prior to the commencement of the
field, investigation.
2. All necessary permits were obtained prior to the commencement
of drilling and installation of the ground water monitoring well.
KP, AZAN & ASSOC[AYES~ {NC.
Page
Proj. No. E87-08~,
3. A total of four exploratory soil borings were advanced to a
maximum depth of 25 feet below the existing grade.
z~. The primary soil boring was advanced through the center of the
tank removal backfilled excavation. Soil samples were obtained at
discreet intervals from the boring, and the borin§ was completed as
a ground water monitoring weft.
5. Three additional soi l'b~rings were placed at 90 degree increments
about the previous tanks' axis, about 5 feet from the edge of the
removal excavation.
6. Soil borings were made by means of ;a truck mounted drifting rig,
equipped with hollow-stem auger.
7. Soil samples were obtained at discreet, intervals by means of
pushing stainless steel tubes. Sampling commenced al'. an approximate
depth of l0 feet below the existing grade, and soils were sampled at.
5 fool~ intervals thereafter.
8. A single ground water monitoring well was installed at the subject
property. The well was constructed of Schedule 40 P.V.C.
flush-thread well casing. The slotted interval was constr,,cted of
0.020'' P.V.C. flush thread well screen, and was installed from-13-1/2
feet below grade to 23-1/2 feet below grade. Filter media consisting
of t~2/1t16 grade sand was placed in the annulus about the screened
interval, to a depth equivalent to Z feet. above the screen. A sea~
composed of bentonite pellets.was'placed at. op the filter media to
achieve a three-foot thickness. A fina! grout seal was placed within
the remaining annular space from the bentonite seal to the surface,
where a surface vault was installed to aceommodal.e the well head.
9. The monitoring well was developed· after completion by means of
surging and bailing. Ground water samples were obtained by means
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, [NC.
Page
Projo No. E87-084
of a Teflon bailer, an'd decanted into a volatile organics analysis
vial. ~
10; ' All "~-r~P-le~'-"~'-r-~'-~'~-i-~-~-~'iHe-d'-a6d--['r'~hSported under 5h'~n-'"'~-~ ..................................
custody protocol.
ll. Samples were transported to a State-approved laboratory for
chemical analysis. Soil samples were analyzed to de[ecL the presence
and concentration-of .Oil and. Grease, Total Lead and Pu~lgeable
Halocarbons.
12. Please refer to the site plan at the end of tl~e text for soil
boring and monitoring well local, ions.
SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Soil Profile
A total of four exploratory soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth
of 25 feel below the existing grade at the project site. The soil profile
generally consisted of a silty fine grained sand from the surface to an
approximate depth of 9 feet below the existing grade. Below the 9 fool below
grade strata~ a fine to medium grained sand 'with occasional interbedded lenses
of slit"Was encountered to an approximate depth of 2Z fee[ below the existing
grade. Below the 22 foot horizon, a coarse rounded gravel 'was encountered to
the maximum depth of our soil borings which were terminated at an approximate
depth of 25 feet below the existing grade.
For more detailed information regarding subsoits encountered at the
project site, please refer to the logs of borings included in Appendix A of this
reportr
Regional Hydrologic Conditions
......... The p-r0jeet S~'[e '~w'&s' located' ~v~i-thin [he South lahontan Hydt:o[~)~'i'~-'Study
Area~ which is primarily desert ~nd is drained internally with no outlet Lo the
KRAZAN &. ASSO(]IATE5, [NC.
Page
Proj. No. E87-08L~
ocean. Three major rivers flow t. hrough the region throughout the year (at least
in the upper reaches) which are the Owens, Mojaw,. and Armagosa Rivers.
.......................... _Wi~h._i_n__.t__h~_..__s_?u___d_y_. area, 81 ground water basins and areas of' potential
ground water storage have been idenLified~ of which the inventory covers 55
ground water basins. The total area of the inventory area is about
square miles~ with water bearing deposits ranging in thickness up t.o 2~000 feet.,
~ Usable storage for 50 of the basins is about 2~,7 million acre-feet, with the.
major 'limiting factor affecting usable storage capacity being the occurrence of
saline deposits within the'sediments of the ground water basins,
Ground Water Conditions
(Ground water was encountered in our exploratory soil borings at an
approximate depth of 1~ feet below the existing grade. Review of the Kern
County Water Agency. Report, May 19877 tends to corroborate our field
observations. The project site was located neat" the ~<ern River~ which through
the ;~ern. River Channel provides recharge to the unconfined aquifer. The
proximity of the project site to the Kern River and also the Calloway Canal
suggest that those features influence the hydrologic conditions at the project
site.
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
A total of 8 soil and 1 gro,jnd w~.tter sa~nples were obtained for chemica[
analysis from the project site. the samples were submitted to a State-approved
'laboratory~ and analyzed to detect the presence of those consl:ituents associated
with petroleum waste oil Soil samples w.ere analyzed to der. ecL presence'~ and
concentration of Total Lead~ Oil and (]rease and Purgeable Halocarbons. 'The
ground water sample was analyzed Lo detect presence and concentration of
petroleum constituents by EPA Method ~02 .analysis~ and Oil and Grease. The
results of that analysis is summarized on the Tables as follows:
KP, AZAN & ASSOC[ATES~ [NC.
'1
~' Page 7
· - Proj. No. E87-08/4
TABLE [
Concentration of ¢Vaste Oil Constituents in Soil
~',~'~ i. ~ t~ o ,~ ~ ir; "~'r ~'~' ~ ~;: ~ i-i¥i';~'rT;~';~-~;~'~'-~;~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ d)-~-~-~ .............. ~-'
CJnstituent~ A-10' A-15' Bi-10' Bl-15' 82-10' 82-15' B3-10' B3-15'
Total Lead
Oil & Grease 40.0 8.0
Bromodichloro,nethane ~/d n/d
Bromoform n/d n/d
Bromomethane n/d n/d
Carbon Tetrachloride n/d n/d
Chlorobenzene n/d n/d
Chtoroethane n/d n/d
2-Chloroethylvinyl-'
ether n/d
Chloroform n/d
Dibromochloromethane n/d
1,2-Oichlorobenzene n/d
1,]}-Dichlorobenzene n/d
1,Z~-Dichlorobenzene n/d
Oichlorodi flouro-
methane n/d n/d
1,1-Oichloroethane n/d n/d
1,2-Oichloroethane n/d n/d
1,1-Oichloroethene n/d n/d
trans-l,2-Oich.loro-
ethene n/d, n/d
1,2-Dichloropropane n/d n/d
cis-l,J~-Oichloro-
propene n/d n/d
trans-l,::~-Oichlo ro-
propene n/d n/d
,Vlethy lene chloride n/d n/d
1,1,2,2- ]'err achloro-
ethane n/d n/d
Tet. rachloroethene n/d n/d
I,l,i-Trichloroethane n/d n/d
1,1,2- rrichloroethane n/d n/d
Trichloroethene ,~/d n/d
Trichlorofluoro-
methane n/d n/d
Vinyt Chloride n/d n/d
<~ <~
a,.0 12.0
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d' n/d
n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
n/d n/d
4.0 24~0 -2.0 2.0
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d. n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
n/d n/d' n/d n/d
n/d n/d n/d n/d
KRAZAN & ASSOC[ATES~ [NC.
~ Page 8
" Proj. No. E87-084
TABLE .I!
............ Concentration._o.f?el~roleum Constituents in Ground...:Wate.r.
(Concentrations in parts per billion unless specified otherwise)
Constituent Well A Sample
Benzene 4.17
Ch[orobenzene n/d
1,2-Oichlorobenzene n/d
i,~-Dichlorobenzene n/d
i,~;-Dichlorobenzene n/d
Ethyl benzene 2.55
Toluene 25.90
o-Xylene n/d
m-Xylene n/d
p-Xylene n/d
Oil & Grease (in ppm) <i.0
Legend
n/d - Non-detected < - Less than ppm - parts per million
" For more detailed information regarding the results of chemical analysis,
please...refer to the certified analytical reports included in Appendix' B of this
report.
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS'
Soil borings were placed in the immediate vicinity of the previously
removed waste oil tank location in order to obtain data which would help to
identify the presence and possible movement of contarninant:s in subsoils and
ground water. The soil borings were placed adjacent to the tank removal area,
as well' as one boring placed.through the ee,lter of the tank removal backfilled
excavation. . The soil.boring advanced_._through the center of.the .tank backfill ..............
area was developed into a ground water monitoring well. The adjacent remaining
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Page
Proj. No. E87-084
three soil borings were advanced-to obtain soil samples for chemical analysis
and t.o log the subsoils.
The soils encountered in exploratory borings at the project site consisted
generally of sands and silty sands. Those soil types are generally associated
with having somewhat higher rates of permeability than silt or clay sized soils.
Ground 'water was encountered al: an approximate depth of 16 feet below
the existing grade at the location drilled at the project site. Review of
published data regarding ground water conditions in the area of tl~e subject
property confirm thai the depth at which ground water was 'encountered was ''
t'ypical.
The results of chemical analysis conducted on soil samples generally shows
non-detectable presence of contamination. However, the results of the oil and
grease analysis had shown low levels of oil and grease !)resent in the subsoils,
with the greatest Concentration noted in the soil boring located directly
beneath the previous tank location, at an approximate depth of ].0 feet below
the existing grade. The ].0 fool below grade depth was roughly equivalent tO a
depth of about /4 feet below the previous tank bottom.
The results of the chemical analysis conducted on tl~e ground water sample
obtained from the monitoring well installed at the project site have shown
contamination present. The constitue.qrs nCted from that. analysis suggest that
the character of the conta~ninant, was more familiar to that.of gasoline, rather
than waste oil. The compounds noted from volatile organics analysis of the
ground._...water sample obtained from the monitoring well were limited to
Benzene, Et~hylbenzene, and Toluene. The results of the oil and' grease analysis
conducted on the ground water sample tend to confirm thai suspicion, indicting
less than 1 part per million concentration in ground watt~.r.
Auger cuttings from the exploratory soil borings at depths and locations ,
drilled were field screened with a portable photoionization detector. The results
of the field screenings had generally shown non-detected readings, with
exception of the MW-A boring location. The MW-A boring was sampled at
depths of .]`0 and ].5 feel', below the existing grade, and soil sa, nples were field
screened as they were obtained. The soil sample obtained from the 3.0 foot
......... ..depth had shown a resp. onse. on the.. p_.ho~o_ior!ization_ ,~et_~.r...o...f...a~pl~r?.~!m. a!?ly :z0
ppm. The' corressponding Iai)oratory chemical analysis result of that. salnple had
KRAZAN & ASSOC[AfE5~ [NC.
Page l0
Proj. No. E87-084
shown .oil and grease present in the sample at a concentration of 40 ppm, with
non-detected levels of total read or purgeable halocarbons.
CONCLUSIONS AND i--tECOMMENDATIONS
'Conclusions
Based upon review of the data obtained from our filed and laboratory
investigations~ review of published data regarding ground water and hydrology
conditions in the vicinity of the subject property, and review of investigations
of hydrocarbon contamination by others at an adjacent property, the following
conclusions have been developed:
1. Ground water exists beneath the previously removed waste oil tank location
at' the project site at an approximate depth of 16 feet below the existing grade.
2. Minor levels of petroleum hydrocarbon conta,nination were noted at' an
approximate depth of 10 feet below the existing grade, directly below the waste
oil tank removal location. The character of the contamination noted at that
location was oil and grease at a conce~tration'of 40 parts per million, with
non-detectable levels of purgeable organic halocarbons or total lead.
.~3. Remaining soil borings and soil samples had shown no evidence of presence of
contamination by residual waste oil, either by field observation or laboratory
analysis at depths and locations sampled.
~. Results of chemical analysis conducted on a ground water sample obtained
from the ground water monitoring welt installed directly beneath the waste oil
tank removal location had shown contamination present. In our opinion, the
constituents identified in the ground water sample suggest that character of the
contamination was more familiar to that of gasoline than waste cit. The
constituents noted from the analysis were identified as Benzene, £thylbenzene,
..... and Toluene; with. oil and grease concentrations below detection limits
IKRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ .....................................~ II IIIII II I I I
Page ll
Proj. No. E8?-0Ba,
5. Exploratory soil borings placed radially around the waste oil tank removal
location had shown non-detected levels of contamination present, with
conducted on those additional samples to detect purgeabte.ha]ocarbons yielded
non-detected results. [n our opinion, the iow levels of oil and grease noted in
the ,subsoils adjacent to the tank removal location were inconclusive in
suggesting waste oil congamination, and 'were not supported as waste oil
contamination by other petroleum constituent related chemical analysis
conducted on those'same samples.
6. Review of data obtained from the drilling, soil sampling, and chemical
analysis of subsoils in the immediate vicinity of the removed waste oil tank, in
our opinion, does not suggest the removed waste oil tank as the source of
contamination noted in the ground water at the project sil~e (at the location
investigated).
Recommendations
Based upon the conclusions developed from interpretation of data obtained
during the field investigation, the following .reeommendat:ions regarding ~he
project site have been summarized:
].. It is_.r..eeommended that a thorough review of existing conditions' of adjacent
properties be conducted to help define the source of conta~ninal:ion noted in
ground water at the project site.
2. Further, it is suggested that periodic sampling of the ground water
monitoring well installed at the project site be conducted to obtain ground
water samples for chemical analysis. Periodic sampling and analysis of the
ground water from Lhe project site could be conducted al: bi-annual or quarterly
intervals to monit~)r movement of the noted'contaminants.
KIRAZAN & ASSOC[AFES, INC.
Page 12
Proj. No. E87-084
LIMITATIONS
The findings and conclusions presented in this report were based on the
results of field investigation, laboratory chemi~cal analysis and field observation,
review of published data regarding geologic and hydrologic conditions in the
vic'init¥ of the project site~ combined with interpolation of the subsurface
conditions between boring locations. Therefore, data .is evident only to the
degree implied by comparison of data obta!ned at each boring location~ and
extrapolation.
Exploratory soil borings were located in the field by tape measurement
from existing landmarks as interpreted from available maps. Those boring
locations should 'be considered accurate only to tile degree implied by those
methods utilized to locate them.
The conclusions of 'this report are based on the information provided
regarding tile project site~ review of data obtained frown drilling, sampling and
chemical analysis~ the subsurface conditions encountered at the time of tile
investigation~ and professional interpretation.
The geotechnical data presented herewith is based upon professional
interpretation utilizing the "state of the art" and a degree of conservatism
deemed proper as of the report date. [t is not warranted that such data cannot
be superseded by future geotechnical or technological developments.
KRAZAN ,~ ASS(DC[ATE$, [NC.
.. Page 13
Proj. No. E87-08~,
If there are any questions or if we .can be of further assistance, please do
not-hesitate to' cont'act'-our office.-
Respectfully Submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOq A//ES
3effrey S. Palmer
Environmental Specialist
~vlR. E/3SP/ko
Ivfidh'ae I P,. -F'rwin~
Geotechnica[ ¢.ngineer
RCE #18625/R. GE# 297
2c herewith invoice
lc Kern County Environmental Health Dept.
Attention: Amy Green
KRAZAN ~x ASSOCIATES, iNC.
Page
" Projo No. E87-08~.
References
Hem, Stephen C., and Melancon, Susan M. 1986. Vadose
Organic Pollutants, Lewis Publishers Inc., Michigan
StaLe of California, DOHS. 1986. Site ~vlitigation Decision
working docu.ment
Zone Modeling of
Tree Manual, Draft
State of California, Water Resources Control 3oard, 198,7. Leaking Underground
Fuel Tank Field Manual (LUFT)~ draft document
Kern County. Water Agency, May 1986~ Water Supply Report~ Kern County
Water Agency, (Cebe[l~ et al).
Schwendeman~ T.G.~ and Wilcox, H.K.~ 1987. Underground Storage Systems.
Lewis Publishers, Inc. Michigan
Twin City Testing, Incorporated, Subsurface Contamination Assessment, Davies
Oil Company, Bakersfield, California, 1/4231 87-533, 3uly, ].987, St, Paul, Mn.
(an assessment report)
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES,
Project FLEET WHOLESALE TIRE Boring No.
BAKERSFIELD,-CALIFORNIA Proj. No. E87-084
OATE DRILLED: ' October 13, 1987 TYPE oF 8ORANG: 8 1/2" HO11 OW Stem
HOLE ELEV: GROUNDWATER LEVEL: LOGGED BY: SC'
3" Asphaltic Concrete, 3" Aggregate Base
~e Fine SILTY SAND (SM);' .medium brown, minor
. ,x¢~ mica, damp, drills easy ,
....... Fine SAND (SP);'white,~igrey and or~,ange,- ·
damp, drills easy
~o- 0 x No aroma
Well-graded SAND (SP); orange-tan, damp,
0 x drills easy
~0110~ OF BORING
20--
*1% = Refusal, greater
than 100 blows/foot
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
Sheet
Project FLEET WHOLESALE' TIRE Boring No.
BAKERSFIE. LD, "CALIFORNIA 'Proj. No. E87-084
~' 12"
DATE DRILLED: lOctober 13, 1987 TYPE OF BORING: 8 1 HO1 low Stem
HOLE ELEV: GROUNDWATER LEVEL: LOGGED BY: SC _
,~: ~' ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION~
3" Asphaltic Concrete, 4" Aggregate Base
Fine SILTY SAND with mica (SM); dark
~:;'.., brown, damp, drills easy
5-- " · -'' ' >-
Well-graded SAND (SW); tan-orange, damp,
~ drills easy
..... '" Fine SILTY SAND with mica .(SM); dark brown
damp, drills easy
lO- 0 x Fine SAND (SP); tan, damp, drills easy
No aroma
Well-graded SAND (SW); tan; damp, drills
easy
0 x No aroma
15~
BOTTOM OF BORING
25_
*R = Refusal, greater
than 100 blows/foot
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
Sheet 1 , of 1
Project FLEET WHOLESAL~ TIRE Boring No. ~--~
BAKERSFIELD, 'CALIFORNIA Proj. No. E87-084
'October 13, 1987 8 1/2" Hollow Stem
DATE DRILLED: TYPE OF BORING:
HOLE ELEV: GROUNDWATER LEVEL: LOGGED BY: '
,~ ~. ~ .-
~ -~ : ~i o' SOIL DESCRIPTION
3" Asphaltic Concrete, 3" Aggregate Base
~ Very'fine to fine SILTY SAND (SM); -mediu,
· ' :. brown, damp, drills easy ..-.'.' . .
,: v:. . ... .......... ::.~ ~-.. _ ........... . ....... ~.. ',_' .... SZ
Very fine SAND with SIL.T (SP-SM); medium
brown, damp, drills easy
~o- 0 x No aroma
Fine SAND (SP); grey-white, damp, drills
easy
15- 0 x No aroma
BOTTOM OF BORING
25~ '
*R = Refusal, greater
than 100 blows/foot
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
Sheet
Project FLEET WHOLESALE TIRE Bor!ng No.
BAKERSFI.ELD,"CALIFORNIA Proj. No. E87-084
DATE DRILLED: October 13, 1987 ~YpE OF BOmNG: 8 1/2" Hol 1 ow Stem
HOLE ELEV: : GROUNDWATER LEVEL: LOGGED BY: ' SC
' e~ 'o C .~_~.~_
~ :~ ~ .. SOIL DES RIPTION ~ ~- :':~ '--
_ '~:~: :';' '~"':~.,Well-graded SAND (SW); light brown, damp,
~o- 20 x 'F~ne to med~u~ SAND (SP); salt and pepper,
damp, dri 11 s easy ..~.r.
~ Septic odor
15- 0 x No aroma ' '
Saturated ~ 16'
;~": :.. · ...
20 .'
Coarse, rounded gravel GRAVEL .(GP); satural:ed
25' drill~ ~lightly rm~gh ·
BOTTOM OF BOEING
*R = Refusal, greater
than 100 blows/foot
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES
.Sheet
i LABORATORIES, I
· ' ~ J.J. ~LIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
- REPORT: 11-03-87
MPLE~DESCRI- ION': ............................. L ......... ......................................... : -
FPROJECT. E87-084 WELL A
TE ' DATE SAMPLE " DATE ANALYSIS
MPLE COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
10-30-87 10-30-87 11-03-87
ST METHODS: EPA 602 AS RECEIVED BASIS
, MINIMUM
REPORTING STORET ANALYSIS REPORTING
CONSTITUENT ~UNITS CODE RESULTS LEVEL
I~enzene ~g/1 34030 4.17 0.5
l~,~lorobenzene ' ~g/1 34301 none detected 0 5
2-Dichlorobenzene ~g/1 34536 none detected 0 5
3-Dichlorobenzene pg/1 34566 none detected 0 5
4-Dichlorobenzene ~g/1 34571 none detected 0 5
o~_thyl benzene ~g/1 34371 2.55 0 5
luene. Ixg/1 34010 25.90 0 5
Xylene ~g/1 81551 none detected 0 5
Xylene ~g/1 81551 none detected 0 5
Xylene ~g/1 81551 none detected 0 5
OMMENTS: '~
._
., , tnt t I FI III I I 1 I II I II II I I I I I IIII
AGRICUL I'UR£
£1~£AII£AI ANAL
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
pURGEABLE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
.(WATER)
AZAN AND ASSOCIATES ATTN: JEFF PALMER
~60 NORTH WINERY
,~RESNO, CA ../: 9':3 7 2 6
TRAVEL BLANK FOR LAB~ 21332-1
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
10-30-87
AS RECEIVED BASIS
/~- 10-30-87 ,'
AsT METHODS:~EPA 602
lorobenzene
2-DiChlorobenzene
3-Dichlorobenzene
,4-Dichlorobenzene
lh¥1 benzene
luene
i~-Xylene
l-X¥1ene
-Xylene
REPORTING STORET
UNITS CODE
~g/1 34030
~g/1 34301
~g/1 34536
~g/1 34566
pg/1 34571
pg/1 34371
~g/1 34010
~g/1 81551
~g/1 81551
~g/1 81551
Date of
REPORT: ~11-03-87
LAB No.: TRAVEL BLANK
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
11-03-87
MINIMUM
'. REPORTING
LEVEL
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
ASFIICUti
~.,~,,.~,~! LABORATORIES.,N~.
I MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BA. KERSFIELI~, CA. 933011PHOI~
· Krazan'a Associates, Inc. Date Repor e : / /
~ ·3860 North Winery Date Recei.ved: 10/30/87
~ Fresno, .CA 93727 Laboratory NO.: 21332-1 '
..?" ,'., "~. ~: ~. -- ."~"/i'~'.~Z~ ~ L :~ :,i~,L!~'~,;, .,' . "
I ........ ~'i-..~.?:~..-': --':':'" ..... ':"i:::'~7'.:':'i~:?i~'.:~'~'~'~:'-:''~ ..... ' ........ ':"."~"-~.'
I Sample DescHption: MW-A E87-084 10/30/87 ..... 14:45 "
I ~... .., ..... .
IOil & Grease, mg/kg - (-) 1. '
[]
iI (-)refers to "less than" ' .
B C LABORATORIES, INC. ' '
, . ...... . ..... ~,j. j.~, Egl i~/
I
I
MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911
& Associates
Geotechnical Consultan.,ts, Inc.
Wesley I, Braun. CE
Robert D. Ska§~s. CE
Hu§o Kevorkian. CE
Iohn R. Hedlev. CE,
Joh,~ B. Moore. CE
Iohn ,~4. Nlinnev. CE
James G. Sutton. CF.
Alex Y. kskandarh Cl-
loire H, Kirin, CEG
Yhoma$ F.. Vahlslrom, Ch
Krazan & Associates, Inc.
3860 North Winery
Fresno, California 93726
(Prgject #E87-084)
2207-1
2207- 2
2207-3
Lab No.- All Units in
B romodichloromethane
B romo fo rm
13 romomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroeth¥1vinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, q-Dichlorobenzene
D ichlorocli fl uoromet ha ne
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-DichLq.roethane
1,1-DichloroeU~ene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tet~achloroethene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2, Trichloroethane
TrichloroeU~ene
T richloro fl uorome thm~a
EPA 8010 - PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
Sample Descriptio~"(S°il)
LAB NO: Ch872207
Received: 10/20/87
Reporte.d: 10/26/87
"A @ 10' - 0940 hrs.
A @ 15i' 0955 hrs.~
B1 @ 10' - 1500 hrs.
rog/Kg 2207-1
Date Sampled
ND
'10/1 3
10/13
10/13
Detection Limit
2207-2 2207-3
ND .ND 0.01
Vinyl Chloride ._._.~ /
~ND:None Detected ~ Fresno. C,Hif,Jrma
~ Visalia, C.Hiforma ').127~1 3901 So Moom~* IllYd , P O. Box 3236 · (209) 732.8857
D Oa~er~iivld, C.~liiorma 913()4 117 "V" StrL'et Teh.,phon,, (Sl)~l .~27-0h71
~ Plca~nl,~o, C.H~orn,a ')4;IH~ 572').C ~onoma Drive Tt.h. Hh~.m~, (41 ~] 462.40~)
&Associates
Geotechnical Consultants.~ Inc.
~,¥esley J I~r.mn. CE John R Hedlev. CE lames C. Sut'.on. CE
RobenO. Ska~s, CE JohnB Moore. CE AlexY. E~kand~ri, C[
Ilugo Kuvorkian, CE John ~t Minncv. CE
Krazan 6 Associates, Inc.
3860 North Winery
Fresno, California 93726
(Prgi'~ct #E87-084)
'EPA 8010- PURGEABLE HALOC~RBONS
.......... La:b No.- ..................... Sam-~l'e'-D~scription (Soil)
~2207-4
?2207- 5
2207-6 :
Lab No.- All Units in
B r o~.'o d ic hi o rometha ne
B romo fo rm
B romometha ne
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
D ib romochl oromet hane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Oichlorobenzene
1, ~4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorocli fluoromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichlo¢oetlaane
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
- trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachlor°ethene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichioroethane
TrichloroeUaene
T richloro fl uorome
Vinyl Chloride
John H. Kirk.
TI,oma~E Vahlstrom. Ch
LAB I~0: Ch872207
Received: 10/20/87
Reported: 10/26/87
,,..B-.1 @ 15' .-i1545 hrs.
· '-~:B-,2 @ 1,0' -11.615 hrs.
B-.2 @ 15' - 1630 hrs.
mglKg
2207-4
ND
2207-5
ND
2207-6
~D
L b Director
Soil-E~n*~,.'rin~, Fnmneerin; (]eolo~Iv · Enmnuerin~; ~..;~or.icor,u, · ~.hummal. I .d,~'.~tonu~
Detec{ion Limit
0.01
ND=None Detected (2 Ftc,n,,, c,,h,om,,, ',!-u~
[] Vis,slla. C~lHorn,a 93:78
141-I St,mNI,m~ Street · Tuh,phone(ZI)9)48g-a IlO
3901So Moonevgl'.d.,PO ~ox323b (209) 7~2-8857
· 11 7 "V" Street TeJt, phon,, (gOS) 327-0t,71
572~'-C Sunoma L)r ~ e Tel~.phonc (41 ~) 4bZ-4~ll)
Geotechnical Consultants, inc.
Wesley I llr,~tm. C[ Iolln R. Hedlev. C[ lamt's G. Sutton. C[
Rol)e~t D. Ska~. C[ )ohn I~. Moore,. CI~ Aie~ Y I ~afl(h~r,. C[
K~azan 6 Associates, Inc.
3860 No~th Winery
Fresno, California 93726
(Project ~E 87-08q)
.~,: ~,~'.,'..~ ....-,~. ,~ ;. EPA 8010 "PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS
Lab No.
'Sample Description(Soil) .
b~hn II Ki~'k,
Th,)rT,a,, I:. '~,',~hkt rot'ri. Ch
LAB NO: 'Ch872207
Received: 10/20/87
Reported: 10/26/87
Date ~ampled
.... ;" B-3 @ 10' - 1700 hrs.
'-~ ...... B-3 @ 15' --1720 hrs.
Lab No.- All Units in -.
rog/Kg
B romod ic hl oromethan e
B romo fo rm
B romomethane
Carbon tetrachlori~e' .........................
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
D ib romoch I oromet ha n e
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, q-Dichlorobenzene
D ich Iorocti fl uoromet bane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2- D ichloi:-bethane
1 ..1-Dichloroethene
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
.1,2-Dichloropropane .....
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1,3- Dichloropropene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichlor0ethane
Trichloroethe~e
Trichlorofluoromethane
2207-7
ND
2207-8 Detection Limit
ND 0.01
Vinyl Chloride,~ [
' ' ' Y' L L b D'rectar '
Soil E~m~.n.~ · [n~im,t, rin~ Cuolo~V · En~immd.~uo~.~on~ · Lh~mic;I ~ato~i.s
D=None Detected ~ [~.~.o, Cahior.,,~ '~t, 1414 S~.mi~laus
U Vis:li.~, Cahf~)m,,~ ~t3278 .1901 So .S~oof,,v I~lvd . I' O I~ox .~23~ (20~J) 732.~857
[~ flakersileld, C.d~fofrd,I (t l'{().l 117 "V" Sin'ut 1 ,'h'l)hout' (~()q) 327-I)G71
BSK.
& Associates ..
CHEMICAL LABORATORY TEST DATA
~: ~zc£zv~D: 10/20/87
~T~ s~'~-~n: 10/13/87
s/J~t~ BY: S. Curra
~Po~T ~Tr_: 11/2/87
ctz~rr: Krazan & Associates, Inc.
3860 North Winery
' LAB NO. SAMPLE IDENTiFiCATION ........................
Fresno, California ~9_37_.~..==. .... . ........... '?~207'-1 .......== A @ 10i 0940 hrs.
(ProjeCt ~E87-084) 2207-2 A ~ 15~ 0955 hrs.
2207-3 B1 ~ 10~ 1500: hrs.
All Units in"~glKg unless Otherwise Noted (SOIL) -]
LAB NO. LAB NO. LAB NO .... LAB NO. LAB NO. LAB NO.
DETERMINATION ........ '-"DETERMINATION'
2207-i 2207-2 2207-3 2207-1 2207-2 2207-3
Acidity Total (taCO3) Nickel (NJ)
Alkalinity Total (taCO3) Nitrate ( )
Alkallnity ?hth (CatO3) NiLrite ( )
Alumin~ (Al) Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)
A~nonia ( ) Nitrogen, Organic
Arsenic (As) Odor (TO~)
Zarium (Ba) Oil & Crease 40 '8 4
Beryl~um (Be) pH (Std. Units}
Bicarbonate (HCO3) Phenolics ,.
Bio Oxy§eh De~and (02) Phosphace~ Ortho (. )
Boron (B) Phosphorus. Total ( )
,Bromide (Bt) Potassium (K)
Cadmitan (Cd) Residue. Total ac I06'C.
'Calcium (Ca) "Total Volatile, 5~0'C.
Carbon, Tot. Organic (C) "Total Filterable (TDS)
Carbonate (CO~) "Total Nonfilterable (SS)
Chem. Oxygen Demand (02) "Tot.Volatile Nonfilterable
Chloride (C1) Selenium (Se)
Chlorine. Residual (C12) Silica (BIO2)
Chlorophyll ( ) Silver. (Ag)
Chromi~a (Ct+6) ,~_. Sodium (Na)
~hromLum. Total (Ct) Solids, Se~tleable (M1/l~h)
Cobalt (Co) Sulfate (.SO4) ;
Color (AP}iA) Sulfide (S)
Cond~cti~rity, Sulfite (503)
(~mhos/c~n), at 25'C. Surfactan~s (~d~AS) "
Copper (Cu) Turbidity (NTU)
Cyanide. Total (CN) Zinc (Zn)
Fluoride (F) Total Colifoma (MPN/10Oml)
~[ardness (CaCO3) Fecal Coliform (t.~N/100.~l)
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb) <3 <3 <3
Magnesium (ME) .'
Manganese (Mn)
Mercury (Hg)
Molybdent~= CMo) ...................................... : ........ : .......... 2 ........ ,
BSK
CREMICAL LABORATORY TEST DATA
& Associates ~,~ ~zc£:v~o: 10/20/87"
~ s~_~: 10/13/87
s~zo sY: S. Curra
cz.:~rt: Krazan & Associates, Inc.
3860 North Winery
............. F~"; ~--C-~lTfb~r~n [~'-': '9372'6 .............. ~ ........ ~-~-- ~o-: ........ -~ ..........;.~,~u: ~oS~rr~F-~C~T~O~
2207-4 B1 @ 15' 1545 hrs,.
(Project #E87-084) 2207-5 B2 @ 10' 1615 hrs'~.
2207-6 B2 @ 15' 1630 hrs.
~.11 Units in mgiKg unless Otherwise Noted (SO L)
...... LAB NO. LiAB NO. LAB NO. [,AB' NO. LAB NO. LAB NO.:
DETERMINATION 2207-4. 2207-5 2207-6 DETERMINATION 2207-4 2207-5 2207-6
Acidity Total (CatO3) Nickel (Bi)
AlkaliniEy-Total (CatO3) 'Nitrate ( )
Alkalinity Phth (CatO3) i Ni:rite ( )
AluminuGm (Al) Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)
An~nonia ( ) Nitrogen, Organic (N)
Arsenic (As) Odor (TON)
!Barium (Ba) 0il & .Crease 12 q 7a '
Beryll%m~ (Be) )H (Std. Units)
Bicarbonate (HC03) Phenolics
Bio OxyEen D~mand (02) Phosphate. Ortho ( )
Boron (B) Phosphorus. Total ( )
Bromide (Bt) Potassium (K)
Cadmium (Cd) Residue, Total ~
Calcium (Ca) "Total Volatile, 550'C.
Carbon, Tot. Or~)anic (C) "Total Filterable (TDS)
Carbonate (CO3) "Total Nonfilterable (SS)
them. Oxygen D~nand (02) "To~.Volatile Nonfilterable
Chloride (C1)o Selenium ese)
Chlorine, Residual (C12)e Silica (SiO2)
Chlorophyll ( ) .... Silver (Ag)
Chromiu:a (Ct+6) Sodium (Ns)
Chromium, Total (Ct) S~lidsl Settleable (M1/1/h)
Cobalt (Co) Sulfate (SO4)
Color (APHA) Sulfide-(S)
Conduc~ivit-7, Sulfice (503)
(;~mhos/c~n). at ZS'C. SurfactanCs
Copper (Cu) ,. Turbidity (NTU)
Cyanide, Total (CN) Zinc (Zn)
Fluoride (F) Total Coliforl~ (MPN/10~uL)
Nardness (CatO3) Fecal Coliform
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb) < 3 ~ 3 < 3
Ma~es Lure (M~)
Manganese (Mn),
Hercux7
BSK
& Associates
CHEMICAL LABORATORY TEST DATA
c~z~-~: Krazan & Associates, Inc.
3860 North Winery
10/20/87
10/13/87
S. Curra
..... _ ........ _Er_es no~--.-.C a t i.for ni a -:937.26 ........ ,.
, .... - ...... 2207-7 B3 @ 10'
(Project #E87-084} .- ' 2207-8 B3 @ 15'
. _...L.5__B__.NO ......... . SA.'"rJ3~-E IDE~'~TIFtCATION- -?':-'~:~'-,-~-
1700 hrs.
1720 hrs.
_ _ OETE~MiNAYION LAB NO.- LAB NO. LAB NO ....... ~DET~i'~TiON 2207-7 2207-8
2207-7 2207-8
Acidity Total (Cat03)._ '~ ....... Nick41"(B£) .......
Alkali~£L-'y To,al (CaCO3) ~$~rate ( ....... ~-)-
Alkalini¢7 ?hth (CaCO3) '" Niarite ( )
'Aluminum (Al) Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)
kn~nonia ( ) Nitrogen. Organic
Arsenic (As) .... Odor (TON)
Barium (Ba) Oil & Crease 28
Berylium (Be) . ' ......... IpH (S[d. Units}
Bicarbonate (HCO3) Phenolics -'
Bio Oxygen Demand (02) Phosphate, Or~ho ( )
Boron (B) Phosphorus, Total ( )
Bromide (Bt) Potassium
Cadmium (C~) "' Residue, Tocal .It 104'C.
Calcium (Ca) "Total Vola¢ile,
Carbon, To~.Organtc (C) "To~al Filterable (TDS)
Carbonate (CO3) "Total Nonfilterable (SS)
Chem.Oxygen De.and (02) "To~.Volatile N,)nfilcersble
Chloride (C1) Selenium (Se)
Chlorine, Residual ~C12) ....... Silica (Si02)
Chlorophyll ( ) S£1ver (Ag)
Chromi~a (Cr~6) .... Sodium (Nc)
:Chromium, Total (Ct) ~lids. ie~leable
Cobalt (Co) Sulfate (S04)
Color (Ai~IA) Sulfide
Cond~c~ivt~, Sulf£ce (503)
'(~mhos/cra) 0 at 25'C. Surfactan~s (MBAS)
Copper (Cu) Tuzbidi~y (NTU) ,.
Cyanide, Total (CN) Zinc
Fluoride (F) Total Coliform
Hardness (CaCO3) Fecal Coliform (~.~N/100al) '
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb) < 3 < ~
Magnesium
Manganese (Mn)
Me re.,x~y
]"k)l~bdem.~ ('Ho) ................................................................... : ............................... [" .... ' .............
All Units in mg/Kg unless Otherwise Noted {SOIL) ..... -, ............................. :'
DATE
PAGE_
~ -PARAMETERS ,' OTHER
ADDRE$$ __.KP~.ZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC'.
~50 HO?TH %'17NE~.¥ ~' ~ _
~'O C~T.TFO~HT~ 937~6 f
-- .. . o OBSE RVATIOf/51
~t,~PLE'NO DATE TIME LOCATION ~z ~ o ~x "~ · -- '
,~~a ikl/J~UffiH~O~Y / DATE ~~RECEIVED BY DATE~ R E LINQUIEHED UY . DAT~ CEIVED BY DATE ~j ]oFITOTALCONTAINERsNUMBER ~,
~ I ~ METHOD OF SHIPMENT
~ .... . . . ....... ORSTORAGE REQUIREMENTS
a!LINOUi:HiD OY OATE RiCEIV[O BY OAIE RELINQUI[HEO By DATE RECEIVfO 8Y II~bo~a~o,yI OATE '~ [
S,;na~u~. il~nitu(e ~;gn~urm Signature '~ '
. , TIME TIME T'IME ,
'PAR~L:ETERS ,. .
02-'ERV;.TtOr:S/
!t
{I
I:;~,TE IR'::-:IYE?. '-': .~,--
; /TIME
' '" T:°m=~'"'v I . ·
E}D -"f jDATE.
JS.";n~,ture J
~ iT'i,.~_
iC,:.mc ~nv . j
IT--'
IT----
R~LI:,;QUISHED ~¥
Ftir.:e~J Nam~
R=LI:;QUIS~
ITI;4E
JDATE
1
RECEIVED EY I:-'::~'atm'¥) JDATE.
Name
ii
II
ii
COhn~CTORS
2',,~ A~ IMPROVEUE~S SHA~ BE COMPLIED ANO ACCEPTEO aY 'THE ~~~/
-" PULBIC WORKS DEPA~ME~ PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF ANY STRUCTURE..
API:qJCANT$
ADDRESS
, .., Use Zone J'l ). f Ccc Type ConsI. Use Code
tlE;~;~t~lanning ,.,..~,. <:.,... 7[ ...(,.. ~, i.--~..",~-L.
· ' ' '~kction -~ "¥' '('~ '~ ' Tract/PM ~.ot
School Distdct ~ Dist. No. ,.,..; ~ /.? No. Bedrooms _~,.) /
C6ndit. Area
LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION
! hereby alfirm hat I am I censed under provisJpn 2! Chapter 9,
LcD ,mmancingwith Section ,7.000) o! Division 3 of the I~usiness aha
rroressions Cede, and my ~icense is in full force and effect.
Date It'3 I;I ~'d Cont'ractor ~~.,, ~, DC
"r., ~N~I'E~I-BUILDER DECLARATION .......
I here~ affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law
for the ~o ow ng reason (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions
· Cede Any c ~ or county which requires a ~rmit to construct alter
mpreve (~emo s,,h, or r.epa r a,ny structur% prior to its,, issuance a~so
requires the appficant ~ such permit to l~Le a signea statem, e. nt that
he ~s licensed ~rsuant to the provisions ol the contractor's.Lic.en,se
~w [Chapte, r~.9 (commendn, g.with, S,~. 7000) of Div. ~ o! the,
uusiness anD, ~'ro~essio, ns cooel or th.at he. is, e,xemp, t.?ere.[o~.m.a,no
the basi,s, for t~e alleged exe ,mpt~on..Any vLo.)ahon
any appli .,c~nt IO? a perm, it su~e,,cts t.h.e..aDf~cam
notmore man ,ye nunereo aD ars
[~ I, as owner of the prope~ or my ,empl0y.ees with wages as
their sole com~nsation, will do the wor~ anU the structure is not
intended. Dr..offered for s~e (Sec~, 70~, Business ,and Professions,
Code: The ~.;ontractor's License Law odes not ap~y, to an o ,wner
property who builds or improves thereon and who odes sucn wan(
himself or through this own employees, ,provided that suc.,h i ,mp[.,o,.ve-
ments are not intended or otfered for sa~e. I1 however, me ouiloing
or mprovemant is sold ~thin one yea, r of completion the owner-
builder will have the buruen ct providing that I~e d d not bud or
improve for purposes oI sale).
[~1 I, as owner of the propeny,.am exclusively C~.'n..tr.a~ing with
licensed contractors to ~nstruct the ~,oject (Se, c. / ,u44, uus~ne ,ss
and PmlessionS Code: The con[factor s ucense Law ODes nolapl3y
to an own,er ct prope.rty who builds or impr,oves theregn and who
con[acts ~or su~ projecl,s with a contractor{s) licensed pursuant to
the ~Jontractor's ucense Law. - '
[~ I am exempt under Sec. , E & P.C. for this reason
Owner Date
WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby at~rm that have a certiticate pt consent to self insure, or a
.,cer~ficate ol Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy
~nereot (Sec. 3800. Lab C:).'
Policy No. Cbmpany
[~ Certified Copy is hereby furnished.
corti_fied CoW is filed with the ity inspection division.
IFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM
ELECTRICAL
-.. Item N°. ' Fee ! Item
Elea. Ser
110V I' '""'J'"'
Da, etI
F~x~ur. I
Heat;r ~ "]
' ~
"~'h I I I w H,,. I
~h, I I · ,.IWLi"" I
~ewor J J ' IBkFP I
? .I "I Isop"~ /
,hower / ""l "1T~E
, ' /
MECHANICAL
I I I
I~ & Under
qew Un~s
~r~S~ SE I I , I Ve.t
Heating I I I F~.Vent
~,~ · I I I
' Heating Over I
I /
I~a~.H~c ~ '/ I~,su~"c~
Sw~p Coo~ed / [ ~OTAL FEE
FEES
ENERGY T-24
NESW R-
Flogr R-
Ceiling R-
Glazing S D T
Air Inflrat. S M
T. Mass KED B1. B2, B.,3
HTG. '..
NC
SPECIAL INSPECTION
[~1 Concrete
[~1 Weld, HS Bolts
[~1 Structural Steel
[~1 Masonry
[~l Fire Pro;sling
~1 Other
SPEC. SOIL REQD.
SPEC. SETBACKS/
ZONING REQ'D
Permit #
WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
fohiS section nee~:l, no! be completed it the permit is for one hundred
Ila.m. ($100) or essl.. .
cert ty that in the pedormance of the work for which this permit is
issued. Isha notemployanypersoninanymannersoastobecome
subject to the Worker's Compensation Laws ol California.
Date Applicent
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: fi, after making this Certificate ~f
Exemption,you sbc~uld, bqc. om_e s. ubiect to the ,Worke.m. ' Corn ,pens..a~-
tion, provisions ol the LaOOr L;OUa yOU must torlhwlLq comply wlln
such provisions or this ~rmit shall be deemed revoked.
CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
~tem { Valuation Fee Permit No.
IPlanCheck { S-1 ,., i~, r'" "? ' ' '
IB,dg.Permit S-2 ~-.~'.~-" '" , '2, ~,, '"':' ~}/' ¢ /'/"'
,Plumb. Permit
Elect; Permit S-4 . '
Mech. Permit S-5 "
:Special S-6 '
iSign Permit J S-7 . ·
iDowntown S-20
School Fees IS-1061 ................. ' .................. ' ................
Sewer
:Bonds 74-12e~27/ .
ITOTAL } / Ii
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lendin6 a~ency for my
performance of the work wh ch this permit is issue[i (Sec. 3097.
Civ. C)
Lender's Name
Lender's Address
I c. eMi~ that have read .th s appl cation and state that the above
information is c, orrecL. I agre,e, lo comply with all cjl,/and count,/
ord n, ances, ana state ~aws re~atin, g, to building construc, lion, and
hereDy authorize rep.resentativ~s oHnis city to enter upon the a~ve-
mentioned property tot insPection purpo~es.
Signature of Applicant
Approved BUILDING DIRECTOR
DATE
· '.- CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
BUILDING~ DEPARTMENT
dZ)~--' " Permit Fee $ o%2G
~5 ~ ' ' "Attachments:
'- . ~;-'~m-% ........ : Performance Bond
~ q.,~--', ,.:-' ~7"7" Z' :~ '~ation Map
' ' ' · ' ":~ " ~ .... ~Sketch o~ EarthenSu~ '-'
..................... ~ ........................................................... 7.~ 2 ....... shying 6 chain !~nk fence
' ¥,:-...... ,~.- ~ ..
~' ~t.. ~.~r~_ Certificate o~ Self-Insurance
. . ~ ~orkers ' C~ensae~on
· . i:. - - - , nditions of Pemit
eo drill and pr~uce an o~ and ~as well and for earthen s~ in an ~.-
Zone within the City of Bakersfield at the location stated above, pursuant
to 'the conditio, ns of the C.U.P. # ~ ·
All drilling, including installation and ooerations shall conform
to all conditioned attached hereto and inco.~porated herein as though fully
set forth in this permit.
Dated:
BUILDING DIRECTOR
CI~RS.FIELD
FIRE DEPARTMENT
cITY OF BAKEP~FIELD
.' · ';.'.',~!.h? ~ ' . ·
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
..... i,,.-: ...'.i., !' ' .::'~',;~:~,;.~-~"'. .... ;.~-
.1700 FLOWER STREET
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93305 ''
TELEPHONE: (805) 861-3636
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT,
RECONSTRUCT, DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL
CT. ~
APN: ' '::
'a..G~~ ' ""':aoDn~SS .'~3'305 ~Ul.f.. Street
10/19/87 ~:~ :''~` '~ Bakersfield, CA 93308
i0/20/87 -: .... :~.".: ':': .... ~ ....Fresno~.?CA~....93726
PROPOSED
COMPLETION
DATE
. . · ADDRESS ' '* .... =" ".'"'~';~?~,:/ '-'~"~: '
HOME PHONE N~:.(805)871-833!
WORK FHO"E NO.(805 ) 325-
· ICENSE NO. C57-499908'.
PHONE NO.(209) 291 -7337
JOB SITE:
V 29S R '27E"!'": ~t!~'~'23""40 ACRE SUB. NE/4
East. of Pierce :Road on':'~outh side Gulf Street
DIRECTIONS TO WELL SITE:
" 'Well located directly behind garage'(-iOnl"west side -. : :. ""'
· ' : ,' · , ', '.;.3,::~-;.: .'
TYPE OF WORK DONE:· NEWWELL~ :.'.~"~: . . ',:.~ '" .:.,:"~':.'~:DEEPEN r~ ..
{CHECK ONE) RECONSTRU~ION ' ~ ?,'.¢.,:'::~?-,).~:):;~:OESTRUCTION ~ '~ '" :
INTENDED USE: DoMEsTIC/PRIVATE
DOMESTIC/NONPUBLIC
DOMESTIC/PUBLIC
TEST HOLE
MONITORING
CATHODIC PROTECTION
OTHE~ ....
· r~.' (! Connection) ' ~ONSTRUCTION METHOD:
[] (24 ConnectionS}'
[] (5 or more connections}
ROTARY· []
CABLE TOOL [] '.,'.
BORED []
OTHER Hollow Stem.'~6ger
16 feet .,.,
SEALING MATERIAL {CHECK ONE)
NEAT CEMENT [] w/3% Bent
CEMENT GROUT []
CONCRETE []
PUDDLED CLAY []
OTHER
GRAVEL PACK (CHECK ONE)
PROPOSED WELL DEPTH:
YES [~ NO
FROM 13 ftro
FROM TO~
. ,:_:i: ::~.
PROPOSED CASING
2" .- Sta'inless
[] O AMETER l~'Y P E
25 ft : DEPTH '25i
CONDUCTOR: GAUGE/WALL
YES ~ NO []
PROPOSED 'pERF~I~ATIONS OR SCREEN PROPOSED SEALS/PLUGISD
MA× 26 FT ' MIN
25 ~T FROM. ' 15 +0.',. 25
" ...... : ~ ":"' ....... FROM ......... .TO
FROM TO
· ·YEs [] NO []
Health 580 4113 306 EH (Rev'. 5/87) (Pg. I of 3)
FEET ANNULAR Pelletized Bentonite
FEET- ............. '.~ -OT HE-R
FEET FROM 13 TO 10 FEET
FROM. .TO FEET
·, . :..~,.~.,,.;.!: . . .
· :.....:..
[SEE REVERSE]
' ',:?';'.. ,
PENETRATES 2OR MORE AQUIFERS
~.-~..,~:,~:':'.:':.~::~rm. erm~t'app,cat[ons must be.submitted to the P~ann ng'~ePa.~;;h~!fo~,z°ning;?access and ,ooa p~a~e c~e~ p~io~ to -
~ '". ~':;~submlssion to the. Health Depa~ment. ' ' .... -~; ~ ' · ,.-,.~, ~ .,:~ '~ ...... .. .... ' ' · '
~ .... ~. .....
3.. :; Well site approval Is required before beginning any work re{atedto.wellconstruction. It,is ~lawful to continue work PaSt the
'?~:staee at which an"lnspecUon ~s required unless mspecflo.n,.~.~d.~9~co~Pleted... :, .,:' .,:,.~. ,. .
' '4:."::Other required inspections Include: setting conductor casing;~E~ogs,',all,annular seals,, and final construcbon features,'.
: 5. '"::'In areas where a well penetrates m0r6 than one aquifer, and one'or more of th~ ~quffers contai'n~-p~-&~'J{~a~'~'~:E:L~g
' ' .~ shall be required to determine the location of the confiningclay:layer(s)>:
6: .... .?A phone call to the Depa~ment office is requi red on the.,morn~ng. . .>'~ .~ of, ::the-....,,~...,.,day~:that.,. work. is to .c°m~ence and 24 hours before the
~roval ~f'Water:qua ty and final construction features' are;required before the well is put into use, and before a Permit '
~0ns~r~Ct~°n 'under t~ s Permit Is sabject to any ihstruCtiens:bY:~Oepartment representatives.: '. ': :' -: .... . .,.
, . ....... ., ,~.,...~... . ~ . . ".,
/misrepresentation or non,drop lance with required.Per~{t;Condltlons; o~ Ordinance:will result in issuance of a "Stop
,rk Order. .,,.. · .-,': . - ..- · .:....,. :~-<~r, .~,?, ,~.. ,~,..... .. . '..'.L . ,:~
10; "'~'Acopy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Repo~ as well as copies of E-Logs and water quality analyses must be
· > ..'?submitted to the Health Depa~ment within 30 days after completion of the work,' :':, ". .'. '. ' '
..... '~ . . ..?,... , ,. . . ... . ,* .
:'. 11..~:;~'. D~ hOles must be properly dest:royed within two (2) weeks of drllfing: A well destruction application must be filed with this
, .~,;'~.:. -. <.,~:,.~..,~ ~;,. ., ,: :-,,....'. . .. _-. .
' 12, ';:.'~he permi{ is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after:date'of,issuance If. work has. not been.sta~ed and reasonable
:'~.?progress toward completion' made, Fees are not refundable.~°r}:transferable.":'",~';. ?.': .:" '..*'"
. . .. :.. .... , '.L,~-'~ ? - ,
'132' ,}"The Job Card shall be posted and remain at the well site.available for the inspector t0 sign it off.
- , '.'~/' , . · .......,:~.....;M:~ ..... .. · . :. · ,.
i4. 'Lead pipe shall not be used in construction o~ any private' or':public water supply system. ; ' '
15. 'The use of solders containing more than 2/10 of 1% lead is prohibited in making joints and fittingsin any private or public
. potable water syste~. '
Conditions
16.".',~ have read and agree to comply with {he General noted above... ~ ~. . ·
· .~., OWNER~ SIGNATURE' DATE ":~..'~"' :?~r~,CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE '. DATE
.';. ::~,~..,.~., ..., , . ..~. :. ,....;. = ~ . .
Iii"' ?"(.':'~[)"~':"..'.- '' . · - " '" ' .. '.: .-,:~:.', ,;~>.,::,. ,.:.";:,"~."','"..:' ' . ' '~". ' · . .
., .~ . '.,'.;::.,'~'k~/.':, ~. .., ·.' '!! :'~! .... , .,, ,. ' , ' , ' ~, . . ..
.,:, ZON,N~.'?.. , -i:: .... ' '::i~'"'i:ii?~;'~'?:~';':~"~'::'~;;"~"?""' ;'"""' .... ~ ' '
':'"=',': i:;~'KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'.' ' ,.~ .:
,1' ".'~"-'"'rv'~--:' I ' ':: ::CON0'T'ONSO~PERM'TO""E;'SO"SPO~OEN'-A':-- -- ' '
ZONE '
FLOOD P~IN APPROVAL
~ :. :..~::,. DISAPPROVEd , . ' : . , . - . ..... ~ ·
., ,. , . . / ~ [ ~ ...'..', .y, ~- ~ ~ · ~ .... ,. -
~r,:.-~o~
~ '~;"." .~: ...... ' ' . ' v ...... ' ".'": ;,.."~':~'R~c~ ~ CASH ~ '" C~CK ~ .
SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS
~t ~,;/'~,,':, '
Health'S80 4113 306 EH (Rev'. 5/87) (Pg~ 2 of 3)
. ..:~'?;~..:...... ,: .
i7~00 Flower Street
BakerSfield, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636
~{~KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Division of Environmental Health
Well Permit Application ,
LOCATION · Assessor's Parcel No.
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
_Qc~ n tu~y
..., .~::.;,,.. .. .,..~..;.,,..: .,,
· ..,:~,",.4.~'.' v., ,,~', .. ......,;.....:' ..'~ ..~ :'.
/'1
::";~'":" " ' '""' ,.','..~ii:~:,:!...'~".~:: "..
,, B.,·.'.:,:LOCATION OF WELL IN SECTION LINES, LOCATE'WEL. L.~BY:.i,,w~,~
~, "~,~
',"'.' ,!'.!i~MEASURING FROM PROPOSED WELL SITE TO
':', .;,~?i~TION LINES OR ~ SECTION IF A ROAD(S} BORDERS
',, :i:":;~iLAND. THE MEASUREMENT(S)SHOULD ALSOi'.'BE?t?ADEJ;';i'},i4~.'::,"'}j".
.': ;~ .- .i,,~...," ~...'
Healttt.580 4113 306 EH (Rev. 5/871 (Pg. 3 of 3} , . .'. , ,
One Mile
A. INDICATE BELOW THE EXACT LOCATION OF WELL WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: PROPERTY
LINES, WATER BODIES OR WATER COURSES, DRAINAGE PATTERN, ROADS, EXISTING WELLS, SEWERS AND
........... _:~-PR.I.VAT*E-SEWAGE DISPOSAL-"SYSTEMST' INCI;UDE-DIMENSIONS;*-?:~ .............. -~-=~ .... L= =:.-- .-=~- --:--'-:'--,*~---; ............
L~bL,