HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK (3)ESC
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
10! Metro'Drive · Suite 650 · San Jose, California 951 !0 · (408} 453-6100 · FAX (408) 453-0496
September 30, 1993
Mr. Steve Pardieck, Chief
Drinking Water and Ground Water Protection Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
Re: Sump Closure Report for the Former Mr. Piston Facility in Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Pardieck:
Enclosed is the Sump Closure Report for the former Mr. Piston,~facility located at 4110 Wible Road #D
in Bakersfield, California. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved closure of the
sump in a letter dated August 2, 1993, and the sump was back_filled on August 11, 1993. The soil was
recycled by thermal desorption at the CleanSoils, Inc., facility in Bakersfield, California. The excavated
area was asphalted to its original condition on September 15, 1993.
Please do not hesitate to call us if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Richard E. Freudenberger
Senior Vice President
REF:ssd:ljw
790
Enclosure
cc/encl:
John MacKessey, Macke-Vee Company
Ruben Medina, Department of Toxic Substances Control
Terry Gray, Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services
Suzanne Marcel, Emerson Electric Co.
Frederick S. Phillips, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
Reston, VA · Boxborough, MA · Pittsburgh, P/~ · Minneapolis, MN · Chester. UK · London, UK
ESC
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
101 MetrO Drive · Suite 650 · San Jose, California 95110 · (4081 453-6100 · FAX (408) 453-0496
SUMP CLOSURE REPORT
MR. PISTON FACILITY
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED
BY
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 30, 1993
Reston, VA · Boxborough, MA · Pittsburgh, PA ,, Minneapolis, MN · Chester, UK · London, UK
Contents
Certification
Introduction
Site Background
Closure Activities
Sump Removal
Soil Excavation
Collection of Verification Samples
Verification Sampling Results
Backfilling Activities
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
Waste Characterization and Disposal
Summary and Conclusions
List of Figures:
Figure 1 - Site location
Figure 2 - Sump location
Figure 3 - Excavation log, North-South
Figure 4 - Excavation log, East-West
Tables:
Table 1 - Verification sampling results
Appendices:
Appendix A - Sludge analysis
Appendix B - Verification sampling results
Appendix C - Additional verification sampling results
Appendix D - Quality assurance summary report
Appendix E - Concrete disposal documentation
List of
List of
Page
1
2
4
7
7
8
11
13
16
17
18
19
3
5
9
10
14
ESC
ii
Contents
(continued)
Appendix F - Analytical results for composite samples
Appendix G - CleanSoils soil profile
Appendix H - Non-hazardous waste hauler records
Appendix I - Soil recycling certificate
ESC
Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a systern designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. ~ Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage
the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, I certify that the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, tree, accurate, and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submittiing false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Harry W. Short
Registered Geologist #243
-1-
Introduction
In response to and in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) Administrative Order Docket No. AO-CA92-01 (Order) Section 15, issued to Macke-Vee
Company and Mr. Piston Machine and Parts (Respondents) on September 30, 1992, Environmental
Strategies Corporation (ESC) conducted a shallow injection well destruction. The field activities were
performed in accordance with the scope of work outlined in the Sump Closure Plan prepared by ESC
dated March 18, 1993. The sump closure plan was prepared in accordance with the Order and the
Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells issued by the USEPA Region IX in 1992. The plan
was approved by the USEPA on May 7, 1993 and field work began on June 2, 1993.
This closure report describes the activities performed to close the sump, classified as a Class V
shallow injection well by the Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services (KCDEHS),
located at 4110 Wible Road/iD in Bakersfield. California (Figure 1). It includes a description of site
conditions, closure activities, verification sampling results, quality control/quality assurance procedures,
waste characterization and disposal, and summary and conclusions. Mr. Terry Grey of the KCDEHS was
onsite to witness the collection of samples for verification of site conditions on two separate occasions.
He also witnessed backfilling activities.
In addition, the Sump Closure Plan provided for sampling of the drainage route from a washrack
located at the rear of the building to the sump. This sampling was undertaken by another consultant and
the sampling results will be provided by that consultant under a separate cover.
ESC
Trader
So~: USGS 7.5 ~num Gosford, C~fo~a 1954, photorc~scd 1968 ~d 1973
Planz
. Sch
~.:' ' [ WHITE
Wible Orchard
Fairview Sch
FAIRVIEW
IN
Scale: 1" = 2000'
Esr
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES COKP.
101 Metro Drive Suite 650
San Jose, California 95110
408-453-61 O0
Figure 1
Site Location
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
4
Site Background
On August 16, 1990, the KCDEHS inspected the Mr. Piston facility located at 4110 Wible Road
#D in Bakersfield, California, and discovered that a sump was being used to receive run-off water from
the washing and steam cleaning of engine parts. The KCDEHS classified the sump as a Class V shallow
injection well. The sump was located approximately 42 feet north of the building located at 4110 Wible
Road #D (Figure 2). The sump was surrounded by a three-foot concrete apron within an asphalt parking
lot. The sides and the bottom of the sump are earthen. The sump was fed strictly by overland flow and
was not directly connected to any drains, piping, or septic systems.
On October 9, 1991, the KCDEHS sent a violation notice to the Respondents requiring them to
sample and remove the sludge that had accumulated in the sump. The Respondents took samples from
the sludge and submitted the results to the KCDEHS in a letter dated February 4, 1992. The sample of
the sludge was analyzed for California Analytical Method (CAM) 17 heavy metals, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline and diesel, and oil and grease. The
only metal detected at a concentration exceeding its Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) was lead
at 6,830 mg/kg, the TTLC for lead is 1,000 mg/kg (Appendix A). The only VOCs detected in the sludge
were benzene (5 mg/kg), ethylbenzene (6 mg/kg), toluene (15 mg/kg), and total xylenes (57 rog/kg). The
concentration of TPH as gasoline was 300 mg/kg and the concentration of TPH as diesel was 1,500
mg/kg. The concentration of oil and grease in the sludge was 41,000 rog/kg.
In October 1991, pursuant to a request by the KCDEHS, the Respondents immediately ceased all
activities associated with the steam cleaning of engine parts and placed a temporary cover over the sump
to prevent any fluids from entering it.
In September 1992, the USEPA assumed responsibility as the lead agency for the site and issued
an administrative order to the Respondents.
ESC
N
Asphalt
3' Concrete Apron
~x 10' Wide
I x 2.8' Deep Sump
Mr. Piston Building
4110 Wible Road, #D
Asphalt
Scale (ft)
20
I
ESC
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
101 Metro Drive Suite 650
San Jose, California 95110
408-453-61 O0
Figure 2
Sump Location
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
I:'xLOTU$',~ I{AWPrFIXBAKI~.$ .2.1~RW
6
The USEPA ordered the Respondents to cease all operations associated with the sump and submit a work
plan for its closure. In March 1993, the Respontdents submitted the closure work plan, which was
approved by the USEPA on May 7, 1993.
ESC
Closure Activities
Closure activities began on June 2, 1993, and consisted of removal of the sump, excavation of
contaminated soils, and collection of verification samples. The work area was secured and a
decontamination area was set up. The fence surrounding the property was used to separate the excavation
from the public and a site safety meeting was held before any activities occurred.
The USEPA, the KCDEHS, and the California Environmental Protection Agency Department of
Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) were contacted at: least seven days before the initiation of any closure
activities.
Initial ambient air monitoring using a flame ionization detector (FID) indicated low levels of
rt
VOCs emanating from the sump. Thus, the ambientt air required only periodic monitoring.
Sump Removal
A Case 580 backhoe with a two-inch impact: hammer was used to break and remove the concrete
surrounding the sump. After the concrete was broken into manageable pieces, the impact hammer was
removed and replaced with a 1-quarter cubic yard bucket. The bucket was used to remove the cement
and the grate over the sump. The grate was cut into manageable sizes with a torch. The concrete was
placed on and covered with 20-mil polyethylene sheeting.
The sludge was removed from the sump and placed in a lined bin. The bin was labeled with the
site location and the accumulation date. The gravel under the sludge was also placed into the bin because
it had been mixed with sludge. The sludge, approximately 6 to 8 inches thick, was dark reddish brown
in color and moist.
ESC
Soil Excavation
The soil was excavated using a backhoe and placed in a lined roll-off bin. When the bin was full,
the remaining excavated material was stockpiled ,on and covered with visqueen. The Unified Soil
Classification System was used to identify the soils encountered in the excavation. Descriptions of the
soils encountered in the excavation are presented on the excavation logs (Figures 3 and 4).
After the concrete and sludge were removed from the sump, a coarse to very coarse gravel was
encountered. The gravel was discolored green, and the natural color of the soil appeared to be dark grey.
The gravel was moist near the surface and became drier with depth. The in-place gravel was dense. The
gravel size was coarse to cobble, and poorly graded. A slight odor emanated from the excavation during
removal of the gravel, but diminished with depth. The gravel did not appear to be in a natural state of
deposition, but seemed to have been placed in this location. The gravel was surrounded on all four sides
with a silty sand. The depth of the gravel varied with location, but was found at a maximum depth of
approximately 7 feet below the ground surface (bgs).
The excavation was advanced 2 feet at a tirae below the sludge for the collection of verification
samples. At 6 feet bgs, a dry, dark brown, silty sand was encountered. The sand was coarse to fine in
size and poorly graded. The sand seemed to be dense but not cemented. The sand was discolored to a
depth of approximately 9 feet bgs. Due to the visible contamination of soil at 9 feet bgs, the excavation
was advanced until suspected contamination was no longer present.
The maximum depth of the excavation was .approximately 11 feet bgs and the total volume of the
excavation was approximately 33 cubic yards. ~Ihe total volume of the spoils from the excavation
including the concrete was approximately 35 cubic yards.
ESC
North '~1
i
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14 -
1.5 -
6 ppm ...-'"
SM
./
0 ppm
South
GP Poorly graded gravels
SM Silty sands
....... Edge of Staining
[ Edge of Excavation
I~! Sampling Location
~ Soil Type Contact
r-Ii Boring and Sampling Location
5 ppm FID Reading
0 1
I I
Scale (It)
ESC
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
101 Metro Drive Suite 650
San Jose, California 95110
408-453-61 O0
Figure 3
Excavation Log, North-South Cross Section
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June 2, 1993
I:q,~OTUg'.~RAWPITIXBAI~$.3.B~W
Wes t '~ 'l
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7
8
9
10
12 -
13 -
14 -
15 -
0 0 0
Sludge
1 25 ppm
[] 10ppm GP
_3
il0 ppm
[~8 .......... :
ppm
?'
~°
[] 0 ppm
0 ppm
East
GP Poorly graded gravels
SM Silty sands
........ Edge of Staining
I Edge of Excavation
[] Sampling Location
~ Soil Type Contact
J-] Boring and Sampling Location
5 ppm FID Reading
0 1
I I
Scale fit)
ESC
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
101 Metro Drive Suite 650
San Jose, California 95110
408-453-61 O0
Figure 4
Excavation Log, East-West Cross Section
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June 2, 1993
11
Collection of Verification Samples
Verification soil samples were collected from the middle of the sump in the excavation at depths
of 0.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 10.0, and 15.0 feet below the sludge. The samples were collected using a hand-driven
spoon sampler containing a six-inch long brass sleeve. Samples were collected by advancing the
excavation with the backhoe to a point immediately above the .sampling depth and then driving the
sampler into the soil. The sampler was driven at least 6 inches with a slide hammer that was repeatedly
dropped on the top of the rod attached to the sampler.
After recovery of the sampler, the brass sleeve was removed, the ends were covered with teflon
tape, capped, and sealed with duet tape. The sample was then labeled, placed in a resealable plastic bag,
and placed in iced storage. The chain-of-custody record was completed for each sample.
Discoloration of the soils was noted by the field geologist on the excavation log. A FID was used
to evaluate the organic vapor concentrations present in the soil samples. Readings were taken by placing
soil into a plastic bag, placing the probe into the plastic bag, and monitoring the head space with the FID.
Measurements from the FID were used as a screenintg tool and are shown on the excavation logs (Figures
3 and 4).
The final verification sample was taken 13y hand augefing from 11 feet bgs to a depth of
approximately 14 feet bgs, and then driving a sample through the open auger hole and into the soil. A
clayey silt was detected at the bottom of the hole. ?~e clayey silt was not stained and there was no odor
emanating from the sample.
The sampler and sampling equipment were decontaminated by washing with a non-phosphate
cleaner, rinsing with tap water, and rinsing with analyte-free water between each sampling location. All
equipment used onsite that may have come into contact with hydrocarbon contamination was cleaned
before the equipment entered a new sampling location or left the site.
ESC
12
All samples were analyzed for CAM-17 metals, VOCs by EPA method 8240, and TPH as diesel
by modified EPA method 8015 by Sequoia Analytical, a state certified laboratory, in Redwood City,
California.
ESC
13
Verification Sampling Regults
The verification sampling results (Table 1) indicate that all contaminants of concem have been
excavated and removed from the sump. No VOCs or TPH were detected in the samples collected from
depths 10 and 15 feet bgs in the middle of the sump. Metals were detected at concentrations well below
their respective TTLCs and were consistent with typical background soil levels as reported in the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) Professional Paper 1270, "Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial
Materials of the Contiguous United States" (Shacklette and Boemgen, 1984). Laboratory analytical reports
and chain of custody documentation are provided in Appendix B.
In a letter dated June 15, 1993, Ese submilled the verification sampling results to the USEPA
with a request for permission to backfill the excavation. The USEPA reviewed the results and was
concerned by the detected increase in the concentration of lead between the sample collected at 6 feet (8.8
rog/kg) and the sample collected at 10 feet (65 rog/kg). In a letter dated June 18, 1993, the USEPA
requested that an additional sample from the botton~t of the excavation be collected and analyzed by the
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead to determine whether the soil is likely to leach
down to groundwater.
Ese contracted Smith-Gutcher and Associates, Inc. to collect an additional soil sample as
requested by the USEPA. The sample (SAM #1) was collected on July 1, 1993, at a depth of
approximately 11 feet bgs and analyzed for lead using the TCLP. A duplicate sample (SAM #2) was also
collected from the same location and analyzed by TCLP for lead. The sample was collected in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the Sump Closure Plan prepared by ESC and the USEPA
Region IX Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells. Mr. Terry Gray of the KCDEHS was
present during the sampling and approved the location of the samples.
ESC
Table 1
Verification Sampling Results
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June 2, 1993 (a)
Analyte~ S-0.5 S-2 S-4 S-6 S-10 S-10A (b) S-15 TTLC (C)
VOCs (lag/kg)
Ethylbenzene 360 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 980 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total xylenes 2,700 J 370 J ND ND ND ND ND
Background
Levels (d)
TPH as Diesel (mg/kg)
3,500 DB 280 DB 710 DB 1,100 DB ND ND ND
CAM 17 Metals (mg/kg)
Antimony 12 ND ND ND ND ND ND 500 2.2
Arsenic ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 500 22
Barium 1,400 6,100 6,(X)0 2,(X)0 35 47 71 10,000 1,716
Beryllium ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.56 75 3.6
Cadmium 3 i 3.6 3. i ND ND ND ND i 00
Chromium 120 37 38 16 3.3 4.1 9.9 2,500 197
Cobalt 13 7.4 6.9 6.9 ND ND 8.9 8,000 28
Copper 580 B 86 B 67 B 6.9 B 6.3 B 12 B 13 B 2,500 90
Lead 8,100 340 95 8.8 65 63 8.6 1,000 55
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 20 0.25
Molybdenum 13 ND ND ND ND ND ND 3,500 4.0
Nickel 47 17 18 3,3 ND ND 12 2,000 66
Selenium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 100 1.4
Silver 0.62 ND ND ND ND ND ND 500
Thallium 14 ND ND ND ND ND ND 700 20
Vanadium 14 15 15 21 9.4 9.1 38 2,400 266
Zinc 2,600 B 230 B 170 B 51 B 34 B 35 B 47 B 5,000 176
a/ ND = not detected; J = estimated concentration; D = diluted sample analysis; B = analyte detected in associated method blank.
b! S - 10A is a duplicate sample of S- 10.
c/ TI'LC = total threshold limit concentration.
d/ Upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for metal concentrations
in, natural occurring soils in the western United States (Shacklette and Boemgen, 1984).
15
Using the TCLP method, lead was not detected in either of the samples. The laboratory analytical
reports and chain of custody documentation are included as Appendix C.
In a letter dated July 20, 1993, ESC submitted the additional sampling results to the USEPA with
a request to close the sump by backfilling the excavation. The USEPA approved closure and backfilling
of the sump on August 2, 1993.
ESC
16
Backfillinla[ Activities
The excavation was backfilled with clean sand on August 11, 1993. Using a backhoe outfitted
with a vibratory plate, the excavation was compacted approximately 85 to 90 percent. Mr. Terry Gray
of the KCDEHS was present during the backfilling activities.
The excavated area was asphalted to its original grade level on September 15, 1993.
Approximately 3 inches of base rock was placed on top of the backfill material before placing the asphalt
cap.
ESC
17
Quality Assurance/Quality Controi Procedures
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures for sampling included the collection of a
trip blank, duplicate samples, and a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MSAVISD) sample. The trip blank
is a sample prepared by the laboratory that is transported with the sample containers to and from the
sampling event to ensure no contamination is introduced in transportation or handling. A duplicate sample
is used to determine consistency in both sampling procedures and analytical methods. In the MS/MSD
analysis, predetermined quantities of stock solutions of certain analytes are added to a sample matrix
before sample extraction, digestion, and analysis. Samples are split into duplicates, spiked, and analyzed.
Percent recoveries are calculated for each of the anal~ytes detected and used to assess analytical accuracy.
The relative percent difference between the duplicate samples is calculated and used to assess analytical
precision.
A QA review summary prepared by ESC's Quality Assurance Officer (QAO) is presented in
Appendix D. The analytical results of the duplicate samples indicate acceptable field and laboratory
precision. The trip blank was free of contamination.
ESC
Waste Characteri:,.ation and Disposal
18
The concrete was removed from the site on August 11, 1993 and disposed of at the Granite
Construction Company facility in Bakersfield, Califomia. The weighmaster certificates for disposal of the
concrete are presented in Appendix E.
The soil from the excavation was stockpiled on and covered with visqueen and placed in a roll-off
bin. A composite soil sample from the bin and the stockpile were collected and analyzed by the TCLP
for metals to characterize the waste. The analytical results indicated that the metal levels were below the
threshold concentrations for hazardous waste. Analytical results and chain-of-custody documentation for
the composite samples are provided in Appendix F.
The soil was profiled and accepted for recycling by thermal desorption at the CleanSoils, Inc.
facility in Bakersfield, California. The soil profile is included as Appendix G. The excavated soil was
transported to CleanSoils by KVS Transportation, Inc. of Bakersfield, California on August 26, 1993. The
non-hazardous waste hauler records are presented in Appendix H. A soil recycling certificate provided
by CleanSoils for soils processed through their facility is provided in Appendix I.
ESC
19
Summary and Conclusions
In response to and in accordance with USEPA Administrative Order issued to Macke-Vee
Company and Mr. Piston Machine and Parts on SeFIember 30, 1992, ESC removed the stop. The field
activities were performed in accordance with the :scope of work outlined in the Sump Closure Plan
prepared by ESC dated March 18, 1993, and approved by the USEPA on May 7, 1993. Closure activities
began on June 2, 1993, and consisted of removing the sump, excavating contaminated soils, collecting
verification samples, backfilling the excavation, and disposing of waste materials. The KCDEHS provided
oversight throughout the'closure process. Verificat:ion sampling results indicated that all contaminated
soils have been removed. The soil was recycled by thermal desqrption at the CleanSoils, Inc., facility in
Bakersfield, Califomia. The excavated area was asphalted to its original grade level on September 15,
1993. All closure activities were approved by the USEPA.
ESC
LABO RA' )RIES, INC.
,L ,L E~LIIL ~
4100 ATLAS CT. BAKERSFIELO. C~LII:ORIIIA ~ PHOI4~ (O0~ ]~.7-4911 FAX ~:151
D.R. SM/iA & ~SOCIATKS Date Reported:' 01/23/92 Page '1
7201 PRUI~E ~. ~ate RQCe~ve~ 01/16/92
R~R~FI~, ~ 9330Q ~:a~O~ ~O.: %14-1
A:~.: DU~ R. S~ 805-589-7861
S~ple DeecripCi~: ~. ~O~ ~C~ESSY - 411~ WTRL~ ~. ~D~ ~FIE~, ~; ~1 QT J~
COZeNInG ~= T~N O~ 01-16-92 · 10:30 ~Y DU~ S~2~
TOTAL CONTAMI ~2LNT.9
(Title 2~. Arttole 11, California Code of Regulat.ions}
Regulatory
~thod STLC TTLC
~ ~1= g¢eulLe ~nlce ~ ~ .mq/L mq/kq
Antimony ~on¢ Detected mp/kg i0. SW-g010 1S. Soo.
Arsenic 12. m~/kg 1.o ~W-7060 5.0 500.
~ar~L~R 1770. m~/k9 1.0 5W-6010 1~0. 10000.
Beryllium ~one Detected ms/kg 1.0 $W-6O~0 0.75 75.
Cadmium 20. m$/k~ 1.0 SW-~010 1.0 100.
Chromium 1~. ms/kg 1.~ ~w-6010 560. 2500.
Cobalt 10. ms/kg 5.0 $W'-6010 80. 8~00.
Copper 584. ms/kg 1.0 SW-6010 25. 2500.
Lead 6830. ms/kg 5.0 5W-601O 5.0 1000.
~ercur%z ~one Detected ms/kg 0.~ SW-7~71 0.2 20.
M~olybdentu~ 19. ms/kg 5.0 S~-6010 350. 3500.
Niok¢l 51. mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 20. 2000.
Selenium Nnne Datectad mF/k~ 1.0 SW-774U 1.0 100.
Silver ~one DececteO m~/kg ~.a Sw-~01o 5.0 500.
T~alllLLm N~n~ Detected mp/k~ 10. SW-6010 7.0 7~.
~anadium 19. mS/kg 1.0 SW-6010 2%. 2%00.
Zinc 21~0. mp/k~ 1.0 ~W-6010 250. $000.
Oil & Gr~a~ 4i000. ms/kg 20. ~PA-41~.1
Co~e~t:
P.Q.L. -
STLC
All constituents reported adore are in mg/~g (unle~ otherwise stat=O) on
an as received (vat) sample Basis. Reeults reported represent totals
(TTLC) as mample uubJected to appropriate technipue~ to determine total levels.
Practical Quencitation Limit (re~ers to the 1,a,~ amount of an~ly~e ~etectabl=
Pasco on sample a{xe used aha an~lytical technique employed.
None Dctccted (ConetlLuez~t,.tf present, would be le~s than the me~ho~ P.Q.L.).
Soluble Threshold L~m{t Ccncant=at~o~.
Total T~re~hol4 Limit Ccn~ccntration
E~A - "Me~hod$ for Chemical An&lya~s of Wat~r end Wa,tes', EPA-600, 14J7~-020.
~W 846, ~eptemDer, 1~86.
Depar~ent Supe~-~ieor
Attachm'~. n t B
LABORA )RIES I C. '" -..-"
PurgeaDle Organic AnalyKi~
D.R. SKITH &A~OCIAT£S Date of
7201 FRUITVALE EXT. Report: 01/~1./92
~RSFI~L~, C~ 93~0~ ~ ~: 414-~
Attn.: D~ R. S~ 805-589-7861
Sample Description: ~R. JO~N ~ACHESSY - %IL0 WXBLE RD. ~D, BAKERSFIELD, C3~: 81 QT JAP,
CONTAINING SLUDGE TAKEN ON 01-16-92 m 10:~0 BY DUAN£ SMIT~
Test Method: EPA ~thod 8010/8020
Sample Matrix: Sludge
Date Sample Data R,mp]e Date Analyu~o
Collecttd: Recelved · Lab: Completed:
Analy~iu Reporting Reporting
/~ Re~ult~ Unit~ Level
Benzene
BrOu~Ddichloro~ethanc
Brc~oform
Carbon te=rachloride
~lorc~thane
9-Chlorouthyl~inyl ~ther
Chlorofo~
~lor~th~e
I, ~
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Di~lcr~fluor~e=h~e
1,l-D{chlor~thane (1,1-D~)
1,2 - Dichlor~th~e
1,1-D{chlor~thene (1,1-DCE)
tr~ - 1,2 -Dldiloroe~he ne
1,2-Dichlor~ropane
ci~-l,3-Dld~lor~r~eme
tr~s-l,3-D~hloropr~ene
M~=~ylene ~loride
1,1,2,2-Tetr~chloroeth~e
T~=rau~loroe~ene (PCE~
Toluene
1,1,1
],1.2
Tzlchlor~hene
Tr~chlo~ofluor~than~
Vinyl
None Detected ~g/k~
None Detected mg/kg
~one D~tected mg/k~
None Detected mg/kg
None Dc=coted
None Detected mg/~9
None Detected mg/k~
None Detected mg/k~
None Detected mg/k~
None Detected m~/kF
NOne Detected m~/kg
None Detected
None Detected mg/k~
None Detected m~/k~
None Detected mg/kg
Non~ Detected m~/k~
None Detected mg/kg
None Detected m~/k~
None Detected
None D¢~cted mg/k9
6. mg/kg
ffone Detected mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
15, mg/kg
Non- D~tected mg/kg
~one Detectud ~g/kg
None Detect~ mg/kg
~one Detected mg/kg
None Detected
2.
3.
3
3
3.
3.
3.
3.
3
3
3.
3.
3.
Attachmant B
Purgeable organic J~alvsis Peg
R~k~$FI£LD, C~ 91t0g Lab ~: ~14-1
AUtn.; DUAKE R. SMITH S05-589-7861
S~le Description: M~. ,IOHN MACN~E~Y - 4110 WII3L~ RD. ~D, BAKERSFIELD, CA: ~1 QT JAR
CONTAINING 5LUD~£ TAKEN ON 01-16-92 ~ 10:30 MY DU~ SMITH
Minimum
An=lysis Reporting Reporting
[onstitue~tg ~ . Uni~F L~vcl
o-xylene 9. mg/kg 3.
m- & p-Xylcn¢: 48. m~/kg 3.
Total Xylenes 57. mO/kg 3.
Total Tr~halomcthanes None Detected m~/k~ 3.
California D.O.H.E. Cert. ~1186
Department Supcr~iSor
Attachmcnt B
LABORATORIES;-..INC.
PctroleumHy~roc~rbcns
D.R. SMIT~ & ~k'TIAT~ Date O£
~201 £RUITVALE EXT. Report: 01/24/92
BAK~R~£I£LD, CA 9~08 ~ ~: 414-1
Attn,: DUANE R. S~IT~ 805-55~o7861
Samplc Description: ~R. OO~LW ~ACHESSY - {110 WIBLE RD. ~D, BAK~RSFI£LD, CA: ~1 QT JAR
CONTAINING SLUDGE TAKEN ON C1-16-D2 ~ 10:30 BY DUAR£ eMI/14
TEST ~u~OD, TPH by D.O.II.S. / L.U.F.T. ~i~nual ~lethod - Modifimd EPA 8015
TEST ~--f~OO: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. ~t~numl ~;ethod - ~odif£cd EPA 8015
~mp~e Matt{x: ~lu~gc
D~tc Sample Date Rample Date Analysis
Collected: Received ~ Lab: Con~leted:
01/16/~ 01/16/92
~alysiz Reporting Rep~rtin9
CODstituepts Result~ ~q~t~ Level
Total Petzoleum
Hydrocarbong (ga~)
Totml PeL~uleum
Hydrocarhmn~
300. mg/kg 100.
1500. mg/Xg 200.
California D,0.~.S. Cert, ~11~
DeDartment ~uperwi~or
Attachmene ~
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
I
Relinquished by:
aecewed by:
DUANE R.
Lab o~at'uey No.
Company: Ouane Iq. Smith & Associates
Data aCd Tima:
C3mpan¥:
Date and Tim
Date and Tlma:
C3mpan¥:
Date and T;ma:
SMITH &ASSOCIATES. i,c~' ..:-.. ~. ~?~
CASE NARRATIVE
CLIENT NAME: Environmental Strategies Corporation
PROJECT NAME: Bakersfield
PROJECT #: CA117204
DATE: June 11, 1993
LAB REPORT #: 3F13601
The samples in this report have been analyzed by SW-846 method 8240 for
Volatile Organics, Modified 8015 for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons and by 6010
and 7471 for the CAM 17 metals.
For method 8420, samples 3F13601 (S-O.5-Sump), 3F13602 (S-2-Sump), and
3F13603 (S-4-Sump) were extracted on June 8,~ 1993. The samples showed
Iow surrogate recovery and were reextracted in accordance with method 8240.
The reextraction also demonstrated Iow surrogate recovery, therefore, the values
reported for these samples should be considered estimated.
The extraction blank for the Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (Modified 8015) had
contamination believed to be from vial septa. The blank contamination was not
subtracted from the sample results because it was either negligible with respect
to the sample or not present as evidence by the pattern of the chromatograms.
The method blank for copper and zinc also showed contamination, which was
also not blank subtracted from the sample results. This contamination was
negligible with respect to the sample, results.
Signature: ~--~'%
Date:
Name:
T~le:
Maile A. Springer
Proiect Manaqer
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL'
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, (,A 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
!iii Environmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakemfield - CAl17204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993iiii
!i!::. 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-0.5-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993
!i!iiSanJose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA8240 Analyzed: Jun 8, 1993i~i
i?~iAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13601 Reported: Jun 14, 19931~i
~:i~[~i:i~[~:~i~=ii*-~i~[~i:[i[~[i~:[~[~ii~=:[:~i:[:[:[~![if!`~ii[i!~!:~!~i~-~[!!iii~[~[:[i[:!i~*~-~!i[~[i[:[:[![!~!!!i~-ii~[~i:[~ii[:[:!~*i!i![i[:[i[!ii[!i~[~i![!i~!~-~-~i[-~[~[:[~[i:~i~i!~-~i!ii[~ii[:[i[i[![~[:[![~[:[:[~:=![:ii:=iii[i[i[iiiiii~i~i~i~[~i~i~??:~i~[~[~:i~i~i~[~[~[~i~[i[~ii?:ii:??:i[:[~ii?~[i[iii[ii~[:[~[![:[:[i??~[ii~[i[i[i[~[ii~ii[i[:[:[i[i[i[i[:[:[i[~[~[i[iii[i[:[:[~i~i~i~i~[~[~[:f~i~i-:~:[~[ii~[:[~`~*~[~i~[[i~[~[{~=~[:~[~[i[:[:~f*~[-~-~:~:~::{~i~[:[i[ii~[i~[~[!...*.-.iii~-~ii
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .............. : ........................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100 ..................................... N.D.
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 500 ..................................... N.D.
Methylene chlodde .......................................................... 250 ..................................... N.D.
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500 ..................................... N.D.
Styrene ............................................................................. 100 ..................................... N.D.
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100 N.D.
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100 ..................................... N.D.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
sEQUOIA ANALYTICAL IPlease Note:
Icc: Dave Blaushild, Environmental Strategies, 4 Penn Center West, Pittsburg, PA 15276
I
Maile
A.
Springer
Project Manager 3F13601.EEE <1>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
i!..:..:iEnvironmental Strategies Client Project ID: Baker, sfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993!?!i
i!i!!101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-2-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1
993
~!ilSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 8240 Analyzed: Jun 8, 1993~.~!
~i!iAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13602 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iiiii
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg /~g/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1 -Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis~1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis~1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethyibenzene ...................................... : ............................ 100
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Tdchloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
..................................... N.D.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detect:ion.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <2>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
~}~__nwronment~ ~mt~es ~ient Pmj~t ID: Bake~eld - CAl172~ ~: Jun 2, 1~
~}101 Metro Dr., SuRe ~0 Sample Descfipt: Soil, S~ump R~: Jun 3, 1~.~
~San Jose, CA 95110 A~ysis Meth~: EPA 82~ ~: Jun 8, 1~
~}~ARention: Bob Be~kowsffi ~b Number: 3F13t~3 Re~: Jun 14, 19~
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3~Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ...................................... . ............................. 100
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of dete~ion.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F~3601.EEE <3>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
~ ~-nv~ onmental Strategies Client Project ID: Baker. sfleld - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993 Ri
iiii 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-6-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993~i!
iiiilSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 8240 Analyzed: Jun 8, 1993iiii~i
!i!Attention: B....O..o~ Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13(~04 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iiiii
~-:~!~-~!.!`:1:~!~:~:::i;:~;:[!~i?=~:::~i~i~:~;!=~:~=~=~<ii~?:`==~i~~:~:~:~=~=~:~=~:~=~==~:~[~=~:~:~:~`::L[~!~[fi~=~=~:~=~=~:~=~:~:?::~=~:~:!:~=~=~?~i:~i.~=~=!~i=~=~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~:~:`~¥~:~;~-~VL=L:i=.i.=.:!=.=.''.:=L=.:LV.=.:L=.=.:.=?~.=~.i.==.:L:L:.:.:.?.:~L=L=L=L=L:.:.:L=.:L:.=L:.:.=.:.=L:L:.;!=.¥L=L:.:.:.::L=.:.=2.:;~-~!:~;:L:~:~?~$??~?:~?~:~:`~;~[~-~:=~:`~:~?~?;=~=!=!=!=!~=!;¥:~!i~:i=:::~:
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 1,300
Benzene ........................................................................... 250
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 250
Bromoform ....................................................................... 250
Bromomethane ................................................................ 250
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 1,300
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 250
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 250
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 250
Chloroethane ................................................................... 250
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 1,300
Chloroform ....................................................................... 250
Chloromethane ................................................................ 250
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 250
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 250
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 250
1,1 -Dichloroethene .......................................................... 250
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 250
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 250
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 250
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 250
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 250
Ethylbenzene ....................................... : ........................... 250
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 1,300
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 630
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 1,300
Styrene ............................................................................. 250
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 250
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 250
Toluene ............................................................................ 250
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 250
1,1,2~Trichloroethane ...................................................... 250
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 250
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 250
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 250
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 250
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 250
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Because matrix effects and/or other factors
required additional sample dilution, detection limits for this sample have been raised.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <4>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
~En:':': vimonmental""~'"'~trategles~' ';"'~'~" ~'~ """~"~"~lent"'"~*'~'~'"'"~'~'"'Project ID: ....... ~"Bakersfield' ........... - ~(~A1 .......... 17204~'""~'"'"~"~*~'~'~'~'#~ .... $~~.- ~J~'~'~'~"~'~'~'~"~'?'~2, 1993 ~
101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-10-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993!i!
iiiiiSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA ~240 Analyzed: Jun 9, 1993..=~
iiiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number:. 3F13605 Reported: Jun 14, 1993!i!i
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
/~g/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
B romoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetmchloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ................................................................... 100
2-Hexanone ......................................... ~ ........................... 500
Methylene chlodde .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
N.Do
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <5>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
!~iEnvironmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993i~!i
!ii1101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, ,~-10A-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993i:!
~:iiiiSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 8;240 Analyzed: Jun 7, 1993~iii
iiiilAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13~)6 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iiiii
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethyl benzene ....................................... ~ ........................... 100
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroet hane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <6>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 ° FAX (415) 364-9233
!iiii Enwronmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993 ~i
· :.~?~i101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-15-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993iii!
ii!San Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA8240 Analyzed: Jun 7, 1993~
!~!iiAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13607 ~eported: Jun 14, 1993iliii
VOLATILE ORGANICS b!! GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ................................................................... 100
2-Hexanone ........................................ : ............................ 500
Methylene chlodde .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1, l-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chlodde ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <7>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
iii!Emnronmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993ii==
iii!101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, TB #1 Received: Jun 3, 1993ii!!i
i!iiSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 8240 Analyzed: Jun 8, 1993!iiii
iiiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number:. 3F13608 Reported: Jun 14, 19931ilii
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 10
Benzene ........................................................................... 2.0
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 2.0
Bromoform ....................................................................... 2.0
Bromomethane ................................................................ 2.0
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 10
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 2.0
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 2.0
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 2.0
Chloroethane ...................................................................2.0 ..
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 10
Chloroform ....................................................................... 2.0
Chloromethane ................................................................ 2.0
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 2.0
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 2.0
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 2.0
1,1 -Dichloroethene ........................................... : .............. 2.0
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 2.0
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 2.0
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 2.0
cis-1,8-Dichloropropene .................................................. 2.0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 2.0
Ethylbenzene ................................................................... 2.0
2~Hexanone ..................................................................... 10
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 5.0
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 10
Styrene ............................................................................. 2.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 2.0
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 2.0
Toluene ............................................................................ 2.0
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 2.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 2.0
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 2.0
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 2.0
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 2.0
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 2.0
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 2.0
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of dete(,~ion.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
'Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <8>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 ° FAX (415) 364-9233
iili[ Envfronmental Strategfes Client Project ID: Bakelrsfield - (~A117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993
iiiiil01 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Matrix: Soil Received: Jun 3, 1993i.ii!i
i~i~SanJose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA;~550/8015 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iiiiii
iiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski First Sample #: 3F13~1
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Analyte
Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample
Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D.
mg/kg 3F13601 3F13602 3F13603 3F13604 3F13605 3F13606
S-0.5-Sump S-2-Sump S-4-Sump S-6-Sump S-10-Sump S-10A-Sump
Extractable
Hydrocarbons
1.0 3,500 280 710 1,100 N.D. N.D.
Chromatogram Pattern:
Non-Diesel Non-Diesel Diesel Diesel
Mix > C15 Mix > Cll
Quality Control Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
instrument Identification:
100 '~0 $0 50 1.0 1.0
6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93 6/8/93
GCHP-5 GCHP-5 GCHP-5 GGHP-5 GGHP-5 GCHP-5
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh diesel standard.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <9>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
,~i!it01 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Matrix: Soil Received: Jun 3, 1993~!i
San Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 3550/8015 Reported: Jun 14, 1993.:-.~i
ii~iiAttention: Bob Bealkowski First Sample #: 3F136D7
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~::: :!::: :::: :~::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~:~:::
TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Reporting Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample
Analyte Limit I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. I.D.
mg/kg 3F13607 3F13609
S-15-Sump Method
Bla~nk
Extractable
Hydrocarbons 1.0 N.D. 6.2
Chromatogram Pattern:
Quality Control Data
Report Limit
Multiplication Factor:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Instrument Identification:
1.0 1.0
6/7/93 6/7'/93
6/8/93 6/7'/93
GCHP-5 GCHP-5
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a fresh diesel standard.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not detected above the stated reporting limit.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE < 10>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesal3eake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
?-nv~ronmental Strategies Chent Project ID: Bakersfield - 0Al17204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993i~i
!ii!!101 Metro Dr.. SuRe C~,O Sample Descript: Soil, S-O.5-Sump R~hted: Jun 3.
San Jose, CA 95110
iiiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13601 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iiiiii
............ :. ................ :, ............. :-. ,:- +> · +:. ...... -x-...-: .................................... ,:~.: ......... :-: .......................... :..----: ......... :-:... -:... + · · · ,:~z. +¥ · <.. · -:-:-:.:-:<.:.:.:.:.:., .,,<.. · · -:, ........ -:- · ..~:<-.~ ~:~./~.:.:<.~$~+ <-:<~x-.~-..<:~+.~:<~.->:.:-:- - .:- <. - -:-:- ......
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Limit ConcentrGtion
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Umit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis Ti'LC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Umit Limit Resuit Max. Limit Umit Result
(rog/L) (mg/L) (rog/L) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (rog/kg)
~:'~'~i~'"" "'""" ............. l .......... '"'"'"'"'~"i~ ........................ "'""'"'"'~'i:i'O' ...................... '"'"""':'" ........... i ............ '"'"'""'"" .............. ~ ..................... *~'i~'"'" ....................... '~ii'~7-"
Beryllium [ 0.75 0.010 - ] 75 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) [ 5.0 ......... O.O0~'b ....... - [ .............. 5'00 .... {~'.050 '-
Mercury [ 0.20 0.00020 - [ 20 0.10 N.D.
Selenium 1.0 0.10 - ] 100 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos I 10 - ] 10,000 100 -
Fluoride 180 0.10 - 18,000 1.0
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection,
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer %_)
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <11>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
iii!iEnmronmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CAl17204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993!!!~
i!!iil01 Metro Dr., SuRe 650 Sample Descfipt: Soil, S-2-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993!!!i
::i!i San Jose, CA 95110 ii!!ii
!}i.~Attention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13602 Reported: Jun 14, 1993iii::?:
`~`~`~·~`~`~`~···~`~`~`··~··~`~··~····~`~···~.~`~`:~:~:~.····~.`~.~·~`~··~:~··~:~··~·.~··~:·~·~···~:~:·~:~·~:~.:~:~·~:~:~:~:~`~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:v:~:~:~:~:~:~.:~:~:~:~:~:~:~`:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~.~:~:-:~:~:c~:~:~:~:~*~:~:...~:-:~:¢-:-:~>:~`:~:~:~:.:~:~:~:~·~::*:~:~-~.:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:.:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis TTLC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Limit Limit Result Max. Umit Umit Result
(mg/L) (rog/L) (rng/L) (mg/kg) (rog/kg) (mg,/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Beryllium I 0.75 0.010 ' I 75 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) j 5.0 0.0050 I 500 0.050 -
~1~ it.~ ~'.'.'.'.'.::.::.::.:.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.:.::.: :.:.'.'.'.'.'.'.' ::' ~ '".'.'.':::::'".'::::'.'.'.'.'.:::::.:0.~:~1:0:.::' :~~~~~~:~~~~~.::~~~~~~~~~~:.~:.~~:~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:.~:.:~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~).~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i:::~~~~~~~~~~: :: :'.'.'.'.'.'.": ...... ~D~':: ;:::.'.::7:': LLO~.~.O::'.:;';:':'.';.:..':::'::!':;
Molybdenum I 350 0 050 - 3,500 2 5 N D
Selenium 1.0 0.10 - 100 5.0 N.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 - 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 - 700 5.0 N.D.
~ ................................................. ~ ............................. ~.o .............................................................................. ~oo.'.o.. .................. ~so.~ ..................... !~...: .......
I~:'. :'. ....... ~.~.~.7.~.~.~.~.~/~.7..~.~/.~.7.~..~..~..~..~..~..~.~.LL~.~.~.%~.~/.~.. :..... :~.~.~. ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ ~. ~.~.~.~.~. ~.~. ~.~ ~.~.~.~/.~:.. ~..'...'..~...L~.~.~.~.~.7.~.~.~.~.~.~.7.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. ~..~.~.~.~.~.~.~/.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~/.~.~.~.~.~.~..~.~.~/.~.~.~.~.~.~/.~.~.~.?.~.~.L 7: ......... ~.~.~!.~!/.~.~.::~:.~.~.~.L..'L .'....~:~.~.~.~.~. ~. ~/:!:~,~.~!~:i~. ~. i::'., ,.......
Asbestos I 10 - I 10,000 100
Fluoride 180 0.10 - 18,000 1.0
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D, were not present above the stated ~irnit of detection,
SEQUOIA ANALY'rlCAL
Marie ^. S~ringer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <12>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
i~iiEn~ronmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakemfield - CAl17204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993!ilii
?=i!101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S.4-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993i~ii
iiiilSan Jose, CA 95110 i~i~
iiiAttention: BobBealkowski LabNumber: 3F13603 Report~ ~n 14, 1993~ii
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Umit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Umit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis Ti'LC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Limit Limit Re,'~ult Max. Umit Umit Result
(rog/L) (rog/L) (mc.i/L) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (rog/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 .- 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 .- 500 5.0 N.D.
Beryllium I 0.75 0.010 - ~ 75 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) I 5.0 0.0050 ' I 500 0.050 -
Mercury I 0.20 0.00020 - I 20 0.10 N.D.
Molybdenum I 350 0.050 - ~ 3,500 2.5 N.D.
Selenium 1.0 0.10 100 5.0 N.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 700 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos - 10 ' I' 10,000 ' ' 100" ' "'"'"" '"'"'""~'"'"" ....... '""
Fluoride 180 0.10 - I 18,000 1.0 -
TI'LC results are reported as rog/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analyte$ reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of dete,~ion.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A Springer
-
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <13>
SEQUOIA ANALYT'ICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 ° FAX (415) 364-9233
Enwronmental Strategies ~lient Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993
101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-6-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993!!iii
?:?:iSan Jose, CA 95110
!!iiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: 3F13604 Reported: Jun 14, 1993~ii!
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentratiion
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Umit Concentration
STLC Detection Analiysis TI-LC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Limit Umit Re.,lult Max. Limit Umit Result
(mg/L) (mg/L) (mc.I/L) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
l~U~ ........................................ .-'.:1 ~ ................................ ~0~.-'/.~ ............................. : ................................................. ~.~00 ................. ~O.~ ..................... .,.:... -~ ..............
Beryllium 0,75 0.010 75 0.50 N.D.
Cadmium 1.0 0.010 100 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) 5.0 0.0050 500 0.050
~.... ........................................... s~o ................................ ;o:~ .............................
20 0.10 N.D.
Mercury I 0.20 0.00020
Molybdenum 350 0.050 "
S~lenium ~;0 ..... 0.10 ' ' .- ' ........ 10i~' ~.0 .... 'N;'D; ............
Silver 5.0 0.010 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 700 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos I - 10 I 10,000 100 -
FluoddeI 180 0.10I 18,000 1.0 -
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight, Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Made A. Springer
Project Manager ~
3F13601.EEE <14>
SEQUOIA ANALYTIICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
~ n onme~ Stmt~i~ ~lem Proj~ ID: Bake~eld - CAl17204 Sam~: Jun 2, 1~
~101 Metro Dr., Sure ~0 Sarape Descdpt: Soil, S-10~ump R~: Jun 3, 1993~
~San Jose, CA ~110
~?~A~emion: Bob B~kows~ ~b Numbe~ 3F13~5 Re~: Jun 14, 1~3~.~.[~
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis Ti'LC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Umit Umit Res~ult Max. Umit Umit Result
(rog/L) (rog/L) (rog/L) (rog/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 - 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 - 500 5.0 N.D.
Beryllium 0.75 0.010 - 75 0.50 N.D.
Cadmium 1.0 0.010 ~' 100 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) 5.0 0.0050 500 0.050 -
Cobalt 80 0 050 - J 8,000 2 5 N D
Mercury I 0.20 0.00020 20 0.10 N.D.
Molybdenum 350 0.050 3,500 2.5 N.D,
Nickel ! 20 0.050 2,000 2.5 N.D.
Selenium 1.0 0.10 100 5.0 N.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 700 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos ] - 10 .. J 10,000 100 -
Fluoride I 180 0.10 " I 18,00.0. .. 1:0 -
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer '~
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <15>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive o Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 ° FAX (415) 364-9233
~:::..~..~......~.~:~~~:~. ................. ~i.....~?~:.~.~:<.:?:~.~:.:.:~........~.~:.:o~.....:.~.:~ ......... ~..:.w~?.:~:.~.~t~~i ...............
~=~mnme~ =~mt~ ~em ~rol~t ID: ~aKe~d - CAl172~ Sam~: Jun 2, 1~
~101 Metro Dr., SuRe ~0 Sample DescHpt: Soil, S-10A~ump R~N~: Jun 3, 1~[~
San Jose, CA 95110 ~
~A~ention: Bob B~lkowski ~b Number: 3F13~6 ~Rep~: ~.Jun 14, 19~
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Umit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Umit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis TFLC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Limit Limit Result Max. Limit Limit Result
(rog/L) (rng/L) (rng/L) (mg/kg) (rog/kg) (mg/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Beryllium 0.75 0.010 ~ 75 0.50 N.D.
Cadmium 1.0 0.010 '1 100 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) I 5.0 0.0050 500 0.050
Cobalt I 80 0.050 ' I 8,000 2.5 N.B.
Mercury 0.20 0.00020 I 20 0.10 N.D.
Molybdenum 350 0.050 i 3,500 2.5 N.D.
Nickel 20 0.050 2,000 2.5 N.D.
Selenium 1.0 0.10 100 5.0 N.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 I 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 I 700 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos , - 10 , 10,000 100 -
FluorideI 180 0.10 -I 18,000 1.0 -
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of dete¢,~ion.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer '~.
Project Manager ~...'~
3F13601.EEE <16>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
iii!ir'nv~ronmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: Jun 2, 1993
~101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, S-15-Sump Received: Jun 3, 1993!ii?:i
iiiiSan Jose, CA 95110
~!~Attention: Bob Boalkowski Lab Number:. 3F13t51~7 Reported: Jun 14,
::::::::::::~:::: :: :::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::: :: ::: ::::: :~::::.':::'~:::::::::::: :::::'.::::::::::: ::: ::::::::~:::::::::::::.': ::: ::: :::::: :::~::.':~ :::::: ::::: :::::: ::::: :::::::::: :::::::::: :: :~ ::::: :::::::::: :::: :::: ::: ::: :::::::::.':::::::::::::::~..<::::::::::: :.y.:~.': :::: :::::~:::!::.'::: :::.':.'>'::::: ::.-:.-:::::::::~:::.¥)~:.'{.::'::.:.::::::::::~:.:~:.'{::'~ ~ .~ j.'..:.::::...'.-:: ::' :.: :: :: ::' ~ :.~.~: :...': ::.-:;:::.-':~::'::'?.:'~ :.'..::::
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Umit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis 'FI-LC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Umit Umit Re.~ult Max. Umit Umit Result
(mg/L) (mg/L) (rng/L) (mg/kg) (rog/kg) (rng/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
t~ ..~. ~ ~ ......................... -': ............. ::: :~ ................. ~ ....... :: ........ ~.*.~ ............................................................................................ ~ ............... ::.'::~..~. '~..~. ~-.~. ~..~. ~ ......... ~::::~: ::::: :.:~.~. ~[~ .~.-:: ."-: ::: ::::::'..'..::' <."-::::::::..~:'-':-'.':: ."-:: ·
Cadmium , 1.0 0.010 ," 100 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI)I 5.0 0.0050 'I 500 0.050 -
~~ ............................... ~ .............................. ~..~. ~'~:e ............................................................................................... :: ........... .-'-::::: :~..~. ~-.0.'-.~. ~:::: :::::::~:: :::::.-:::: ...~.~.~.-~.~.-.-::::: ........ >. ........ :~:::: ~ ::'.::::: :::
... - =========================================== ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::: : =================================== ::: ~.::::::~.::::::::::
~p~i~!? ::~i~i::~::::ili~:: ~::::i::ii ii!?:::~i::~ii ~i~i~i::ii ::!i!i?:i::::~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::iii~ii~i~i~!~i~!~i~!iiii!::!~!~ill~~t~iiii~i~i~ii
Mercury I 0.20 0.00020 - I 20 O JO N.D.
Molybdenum 350 0 050 ' I 3,500 2 5 N D
S~i~niurn 1.0 0.10 - ' .... 1'00 5.0 ~'.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium 7.0 0.10 700 5.0 N.D.
Asbestos I 10 I 10,000 100
Fluoride 180 0.10 18,000 1.0
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
3F13601.EEE <17>
SEQUOIA ANALYI"ICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
· :.:.:.:..'..~:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:-....~:.~.,:-:.:- ,~ -,:,~!~'.,~" .-'::'~ .... ~<.~*'~' ~'-'r~;~ ~.~. ~ '~ · ~ .... "-'::~
~ E~ronmen~ Stmtegi~ ~ient Pmj~ ID: Bake~d - CA117204 Sam~: N.~
~ 101 Metro Dr., Sure ~0 Sample DescHpt: Soil, Meth~ Blank R~: N.~ ~
~San Jose, CA ~110 ~
~ARemion: Bob B~kowsffi ~b Numben 3F13~09 . Re~: Jun 14, 1~
INORGANIC PERSISTENT AND BIOACCUMULATIVE TOXIC SUBSTANCES
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
Waste Extraction Test
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
STLC Detection Analysis -I-tLC Detection Analysis
Analyte Max. Limit Limit Result Max. Umit Limit Result
(rog/L) (mg/L) (rog/L) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg)
Antimony 15 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Arsenic 5.0 0.10 500 5.0 N.D.
Barium 100 0.10 10,000 5.0 N.D.
Beryllium 0.75 0.010 75 0.50 N.D.
Cadmium 1.0 0.010 100 0.50 N.D.
Chromium (VI) 5.0 0.O050 50O 0.050
Chromium 560 0.010 2,500 0.50 N.D.
Cobalt 80 0.050 8,000 2.5 N.D.
[~d .......... ~3'i~) ...... 0~'~i'~ ' "- ............... 1,'~'(~) ....... ',~'0 '~.51
Mercury 0.20 0.00020 20 0.10 N.D.
Molybdenum i 350 0.050 - 3,500 2.5 N.D.
Nickel ' 20 0.050 2,000 2.5 N.D.
Selenium 1.0 0.10 - 100 5.0 N.D.
Silver 5.0 0.010 500 0.50 N.D.
Thallium i 7.0 0.10 - 700 5.0 N.D.
Vanadium 24 0.050 - 2,400 2.5 N.D.
Fluoride I 180 0.10 ' I 18,000 1.0 -
TTLC results are reported as mg/kg of wet weight. Asbestos results are reported as fibers/g.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of dete¢~on.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE < 18>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
' "(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
i~ir'nwronmental Strategtes Client Project ID: Bakersheld - CA117204 Sampled: N~,.Itl
iii 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, Method Blank Received: N.A.
iii!iSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA 8240 Analyzed: Jun 7, 199,3~iii~
::iii!Attention:.. Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: VBLK060793 Reported: Jun 14, 1993i~
VOLATILE ORGANICS by Gc/Ms (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1 -Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethyl benzene ................................................................... 100
2-Hexanone .......................................... ; .......................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
N.D.
..................................... N.D.
..................................... N.D.
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Because matrix effects and/or other factors
required additional sample dilution, detection limits for this sample have been raised.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <19>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesal3eake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364~9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
:::::~~.~'~1~~:.~..:~<~
~ i=i~vironmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 Sampled: N.A.
i!!101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, Method Blank Received: N.~
iiiSanJose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA8:.~40 Analyzed: Jun 8, 1993~
ii~Attention: Bob Bealkowsld Lab Number:. VBLK06089,3 Reported: Jun 14, .,1,993{~
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
pg/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ................................................................... 100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether. ................................................ 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1 -Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ................................................................... 100
2-Hexanone ......................................... ~ ........................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Tdchloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of deter~on. Because matrix effects and/or other factors
required additional sample dilution, detection limits for this sample have been raised.
SEQUOIA ANAL3FFICAL
Maile/L Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <20>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL .......
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063 "" ':"'. ': ~'. "".
i~i! nvlronmental b'tmtegles Client Project ID: Bakemfield - CA117204 Sampled:. · N.A.
~i!101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descfipt: Soil, Ivlethod Blank Received:
ii!San Jose, CA 95110 Ana/ysis Method: EPA~t240 Analyzed: Jun 9, 1993~
ii~Attention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Number: VBLK060993
... .~ ... Reported: Jun 14, 1993~i~
VOLATILE ORGANICS by Gc/Ms (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit. Sample Results
pg/kg /~g/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
Bromoform ....................................................................... 100
Bromomethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachloride ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane .............................................. : ....................100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1 -Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ...................................... .. ............................ 100
2-Hexanone ..................................................................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................ 100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... 100
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes .................................................................. 100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Because matrix effects and/or other factors
required additional sample dilution, detection limits for this sample have been raised.
N.D,
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <21 ·
SEQUOIA ANALYTIICAL
680 Chesapeake Ddve · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
Enwronmental Strategies ~ient Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204 ~ampled: N.A. ii!~i!
101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil, Method Blank/Extraction Blank Received: N.A. iiiiii
i!iiiSanJose, CA 95110 Analysis Method: EPA8240 Analyzed: Jun 7, 1993iiiii
i!~Attention: Bob Bealkowski Lab Numbe~. VBLK060793 Reported: Jun 14 1993iiii
VOLATILE ORGANICS by GC/MS (EPA 8240)
Analyte Detection Limit Sample Results
,~g/kg pg/kg
Acetone ............................................................................ 500
Benzene ........................................................................... 100
Bromodichloromethane .................................................. 100
B romoform ....................................................................... 100
Brornornethane ................................................................ 100
2-Butanone ...................................................................... 500
Carbon disulfide .............................................................. 100
Carbon tetrachlodde ....................................................... 100
Chlorobenzene ................................................................ 100
Chloroethane ...................................................................100
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ................................................. 500'
Chloroform ....................................................................... 100
Chloromethane ................................................................ 100
Dibromochloromethane .................................................. 100
1,1-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,2-Dichloroethane .......................................................... 100
1,1-Dichloroethene .......................................................... 100
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene .................................................... 100
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ................................................. 100
1,2-Dichloropropane ....................................................... 100
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .................................................. 100
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene .............................................. 100
Ethylbenzene ...................................................................100
2-Hexanone ......................................... ~ ........................... 500
Methylene chloride .......................................................... 250
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ..................................................... 500
Styrene ............................................................................. 100
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ............................................... 100
Tetrachloroethene ........................................................... 100
Toluene ............................................................................ 100
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ...................................................... 100
Trichloroethene ................................................................100
Trichlorofluoromethane ................................................... I00
Vinyl acetate .................................................................... 100
Vinyl chloride ................................................................... 100
Total Xylenes ..................................................................100
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Because matrix effects and/or other factors
required additional sample dilution, detection limits for this sample have I~een raised.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL'
Maile A. Springer
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <22>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
!i!!iEnvironmental Strategies ' Client Project ID: Bakersfield -CA117204
101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Method: EPA 8240
San Jose, CA 95110
!iiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski QC Sample #: 3F13601 - 07
Reported: Jun 14, 1993
i::i::iiiiiii!i!i~ii!~:?:i!i!!i~iiiiiiii?:iii?????:i::ili?:ilili!ili!~?:~i!ii!i ~i ?:i ~ ..'..'ii ~i=?~ii ~i:~i::iii:=i::i::iii::iii=:i::i::i:=i::i:=i::iiiii ~ii:~i~???:iii???:iii?:iii!~!!~!!~?:i~::~?~:~?:i?:~!~?:~??????:~i~!i??:i??~i?:iii:???:~i~::iiiii??/?:~i~i~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .';:ii?:iii=???:ili?:iiii:-[~?:i!!!!i!iii!i~ ~iiii==Jil i~i~i~:=~i~i~i~ii==ii!i~[ii .-li?:iiii i?:~=: ."'.-'~!~i~i {i ~i~i~i! i~::~! !i ~.-'.:'::..::: ...................................: ........ ~ .¢':= ~.. ~ =. .>;............ :::: ":".';~:~ .......
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT: SURROGATE RECOVERIES, EPA 8240
Surrogate
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery,
3F13601 3F13602 3F13603 3F13604 3F13605 3F13606
S-0.5-Sump S-2-Sump S-4-Sump S-6-Sump S-10-Sump S-10A-Sump
Percent
Recovery,
3F13607
S-15-Sump
1,2-Dichloro-
ethane-d4
60 71 76 106 83 105 106'
Toluene-d8 41 69 72 110 93 109
109
Bromofluoro-
benzene
42 71 76 111 96 108 108
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer~,,..~
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <23>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
iii 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Method: EPA 8240
iiiii San Jose, CA 95110
i!iilAttention: Bob Bealkowski QC Sample #: 3F13608
¥.. Reported: Jun 14, 1993
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT: SURROGATE RECOVERIES, EPA 8240
Surrogate
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery, Recovery,
3F13608
TB #1
Percent
Recovery,
1,2-Dichloro- 97
ethane-d4
Toluene-d8 101
Bromofluoro- 102
benzene
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer :,,.~
Project Manager
3F13601.EEE <24>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
?~ii Environmental Strategies Client Project ID: Bakersfield - CA117204
~!!! 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Matrix: Soil
~?!iiSan Jose, CA 95110
iiilAttention: Bob Bealkowski QC Sample Group: 3F13(J01 - 08 Reported: Jun 14, 1993
....
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT
ANALYTE: 1,1-Dichloro- Trichloroethene Benzene Toluene Chloro- Diesel
ethene benzene
Method: EPA 8240 EPA 8240 EPA 8240 EPA 8240 EPA 8240 EPA 8015
Analyst: S.Hoffman S.Hoffman S.Hoffman S.Hoffman S.Hoffman C.Lee
Conc. Spiked: 2500 2500 2500 2500 2500 15
Units: pg/kg /~g/kg /~g/kg pg/kg pg/kg mg/kg
LCS Batch#: VBLK060793 VBLK060793 VBLK060793 VBLK060793 VBLK060793 DBLK060793
Date Prepared: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/;'/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
Date Analyzed: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/;'/93 6/?/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
Instrument I.D.#: MSF-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 GCHP-5
LCS %
Recovery: 92 84 ~0 84 84 73
Control Limits: 59-172 62-157 66-.142 59-139 60-133 50-150
MS/MSD
Batch #: V3F13606 V3F13606 V3F13606 V3F13606 V3F13606 D3F13606
Date Prepared: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/;'/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
Date Analyzed: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/8/93
Instrument I.D.#: USE-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 MSF-2 GCHP-5
Matrix Spike
% Recovery:
100 96 .~2 92 92 86
Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Recovery:
120 112 104 112 108 86
Relative %
Difference:
18 15 '12 20 16 0.0
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Maile A. Springer '
Project Manager '- J
IPlease Note:
The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,~
preparation and analytical methods employed for the samples. The LCS % recovery data is used for
validation of sample batch results. Due to matrix effects, the QC limits for MS/MSD's are advisory only
~iSd are not used to accept or reject batch results.
3F13601.EEE <25>
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
!i~i~ 101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Matrix: Soil
i!!iiSan Jose, CA 95110
iiiiiAttention: Bob Bealkowski QC Sample Group: 3F13601 - 08 Reported: Jun 14, 1993
QUALITY CONTROL DATA REPORT
l ANALYTE Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Nickel Mercury
Method: EPA 6010 EPA 6010 EPA6010 EPA6010 EPA 7471
Analyst: C.Medefesser C, Medefesser C.Medefesser C. Medefesser A.M.
Conc. Spiked: 100 100 100 100 1,0
Units: mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
LCS Batch#: BLK060793 BLK060793 BLK060793 BLK060793 BLK060893
Date Prepared: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
Date Analyzed: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/8/93
Instrument I.D.#: MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MPE-2
LCS %
Recovery:
98 100 101 98 94
Control Limits: 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 90-110
MS/MSD
Batch #: 3F13606 3F13606 3F'13606 3F13606 3F13607
Date Prepared: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93
Date Analyzed: 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/7/93 6/8/93
Instrument I.D.#: MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MTJA-2 MPE-2
Matrix Spike
% Recovery:
100 103 '101 100 94
Matrix Spike
Duplicate %
Recovery:
100 103 102 101 96
Relative %
Difference:
0.0 0.0 0.98 1.0 2.1
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Made A. S. pring~'r'~..~X
Project Manager '"~
IPlease Note:
The LCS is a control sample of known, interferent free matrix that is analyzed using the same reagents,I
preparation and analytical methods employed for the samples. The LCS % recovery data is used for
validation of sample batch results. Due to matrix effects, the QC limits for MS/MSD's are advisory only
and are not used to accept or reject batch results.
3F13601.EEE <26>
No. 005264 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD '.":: ." !'~
'SAMPLERS: (sionatureb, PRINT NAME:
Relinquished by: (~nature) Date '/Time Rekeived by: (Signature) LAB NAME:
, ~z ~- ~'1~: ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION ·
Restart, Virginia 22090
~Rel[~quishe~by: (~) Date / Time Received by: (Signature) couRiER: {703170%~500
Received for Laborat'o~ by: PRIN~ NAME: Date / Time CUSTODY SEAL NOS: I I ,..
A~ENTION ~B: SEND ANAL~ICAL RESULTS TO THE FOLLOWING ESC STAFF MEMBER:
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL ACCOMPANIES SHIPMENT; COPY TO ES~ FILES
Appendix C- Additional Verification Sampling Results
ESC
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesaoeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
CLIENT NAME :
PROJECT NAME :
PROJECT #
SDS #
METHOD
DATE
CASE NARRATIVE
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES CORPORATION
MACKE-VEE & MR. PISTON FACILITY
: CA 117204
: 3G098
: TCLP Pb
: July 23, 1993
SEQUOIA
I.D.
CLIENT
I.D.
3G098-01
3G098-02
SAMPLE-S
SAMPLE-SD
SAM # 1
SAM# 2
3G124-S
3G124-SD
Page 1
Continued .....
SUI~Y :
The samples in this report have been extracted by Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure ( TCLP ), and analyzed by
SW-846 method 7421 for lead.
SAMPLE RESULTS :
No issues.
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION:
No issues.
CRDL STANDARDS :
Both the CRDL standards, initial CRII and final CRIF
were analyzed at 2*CRDL in accordance with the USEPA
Statement of Work ILM01.0. The CRDL for lead is as
low as 3 ug/L, which is virtually impossible to detect
by an ICP instrument. No corrective action was taken
since SW-846 does not require analysis of a CRDL
standard. '~
INITIAL AND CONTINUI~G CALIBRATION BLANKS :
No issues.
INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE :
No issues.
SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY :
A Spike sample was not digested for this SDG. Samples
3G124-1, 3G124-1S and 3G124-1SD digested in the same
batch, on July 7,1993 have been reported with this SDG.
POST DIGESTION SPIKE :
Not required.
DUPLICATE :
A duplicate was not digested for this SDG. However
Spike and Spike Duplicate digested in the same batch,
have been reported with this SDG.
LABORATORY CONTROL S~PLE :
No issues.
Continued ......
Page 2
10. METHOD STANDARD ADDITION :
Not required.
11. SERIAL DILUTION :
A serial dilution was not analyzed for this SDGo
Vice Pr~
Page 3
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
(415) 364-9600 · FAX (415) 364-9233
I
QUALIFIERS FOR METALS
There are three types of result qualifiers:
C (Concentration) qualifiers:
a) "U" -
analyte not detected at or above the Instrument
Detection Limit (IDL).
Q qualifiers:
a) "E"
b) "N"
c) "S"
d) "W"
e) ~1~
f) "+"
reported vaJLue is estimated because of the
presence of interference.
Spiked sample recovery not within control
limits.
The reported value was determined by the Method
of Standard Additions (MSA).
Post-digestion spike for GFAA analysis is out
of control limits.
Duplicate analysis not within control limits.
Correlation coefficient for the MSA is less
than 0.995.
M (Method) qualifiers:
a) "P" - For ICP.
b) "F" - For GFAA.
[CHAIN OF CUSTOI)Y DOCUMENTATION![
~i~ SEQUOIA ANALYIICAL
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
.,~.,oou Chesapuake LnmVU · R~uwuOd C,y, CA b'~uu3 · (.~ ,.~/ 364-u~ud FA~,, ;=15) $,.,~-=233
819 West Striker Ave. · Sacramento, CA 95834 · (916) 921-9600 FAX (916) 921-0100
1900 Bates Ave., Suite LM * Concord, CA 94520 · (510) 686-9600 FAX (510) 686-9689
Company Name: ~'/~/{.,)/~¢¢/t) ,/-¢E/t)7~- .%'T4.4rT'~--~/~'S (~O~,~. '
Jc,~: ~ ~ s~: ~. zip Cod~: ¢~llfl
Turnaround,~ t0 Working Days ~ 3 Working Days
Time: Q 7 Working Days ~ 2 Working Days
Q 5 Working Days
Client
Sample I.D.
1.:~,~ /
4.
5.
6.
Project Name:,,¢//~_¢~ ~' ~¢~/k. ,,~//.7~/1
Billing Address ( if different):
QC Data: I~1 Level A (Standard) ~1 Level B I~1 Level C [~ Level D
Comments
QI 2-8 Hours I C) Drinking Water IAnalyses RequestedI
I ~ WasteWater .,~ ~~//2/ __
I~1 24 Hours I~' Other
Date~ime IMatrixl eof Cont. Sequoia's
Date:
Date: ~/-'¢ Time://~' :5- Received By:
10.
Relinquished By:
Relinquished By:
t ~,,1:., ~..l,'.l .... I I'~,
Time: Received By:
I,,.,.,, ,-, ..... ,~ ..... ,.: ...,,...,...,. .~lr',. l, , .... .,/-~~ .~,
COVER PAGE - INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA PACKAGE
Lab Name: SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Case No.: CA '117204
Lab Code:
SOW No.
Contract:
SAS No.
EPA Sample No. Lab Sample ID
SAM #1 3G098-01
SAM #1 3G098-02
SAMPLE-S 3G127-1S
SAMPLE-SD 3G 127-1 SD
SDG No. 3G098
Were ICP interelement corrections applied?
Were ICP background corrections applied?
If yes, were raw data generated before
application of background corrections?
Comments:
Yes/No YES
Yes/No YES
Yes/No NO
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for
completeness, for other than the conditions stated above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package
and in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the
Manager's designee, as verified by the following signature.
Signature: ~ , ~ Name: Su Patel
Date: 7' ~ ~:~ / -- ~-'~ Title: Proiect Manac~er
ESCCP.CLP COVER PAGE - IN Rev.6/89
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
Matrix: (soil/water)
Level: (Iow/mc, d)
% Solids:
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
TCLP EXTRACT
LOW
91.4
Contract:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SAM # 1
Case No.: CA 117204
SAS No.:
SDG No.: 3G098
Lab Sample ID: 3G098-01
Date Received: 07/'02/93
Concentration Units (pg/L or mg/Kg dry weight): ug/L
CAS No. Analyte Conc. C Q M
7429-90-5 Aluminum P
7440-36-0 Antimony F
7440-38-2 Arsenic F
7440-39-3 Barium P
7440-41-7 Beryllium P
7440-43-9 Cadmium P
7440-70-2 Calcium P
7440-47-3 Chromium P
7440-48-4 Cobalt P
7440-50-8 Copper P
7439-89-8 Iron P
7439-92-1 , Lead 38.7 u P
7439-95-4 Magnesium P
7439-96-5 Manganese P
7439-97-8 Mercury Cv
7440-02-0 Nickel P
7440-09-7 Potassium P
7782-49-2 Selenium F
7440-22-4 Silver P
7440-23-5 Sodium P
7440-28-0 Thallium F
7440-62-2 Vanadium P
7440-66-6 Zinc P
Cyanide NR
Color Before: BROWN
Color After: COLORLESS
Comments:
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture: MEDIUM
Artifacts:
ESC1M1.CLP FORM I-IN 7/88
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Lab Code:
Matrix: (soil/water) TCLP EXTRACT
Level: (Iow/med) LOW
% Solids: 91.6
Contract:
Case No.: CA 117204
SAS No.: SDG No.: 3G098
Lab Sample ID: 3G098-02
Date Received: 07/02/93
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SAM #2
Concentration Units (pg/L or mg/Kg dry weight): ug/L
CAS No. Analyte Conc. C Q M
7429-90-5 Aluminum P
7440-36-0 Antimony F
7440-38-2 Arsenic F
7440-39-3 Barium P
7440-41-7 Beryllium P
7440-43-9 Cadmium P
7440-70-2 Calcium P
7440-47-3 Chromium P
7440-48-4 Cobalt P
7~0-50-8 Copper P
7439-89-6 Iron P
7439-92-1 Lead 38.6 u P
7439-95-4 Magnesium P
7439-96-5 Manc~anese P
7439-97-6 Mercury cv
7440-02-0 Nickel P
-/440-09-7 Potassium P
7782-49-2 Selenium F
7440-22-4 Silver P
7440-23-5 Sodium P
7440-28-0 Thallium F
7440-62-2 Vanadium P
7440-66-6 Zinc P
Cyanide NR
Color Before: BROWN
Color After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Cla,rity After: CLEAR
Texture: MEDIUM
Artifacts:
Comments:
FORM I - IN
7/88
ESC1 M1 .CLP
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
680 Chesapeake Drive · Redwood City, CA 94063
iiiiiEnvironmental Strategies Client Project ID: #CA 117204 Sampled: Jul 1, 19937:!i?:
::?:ii101 Metro Dr., Suite 650 Sample Descript: Soil Received: Jul 2, 1993i!i!i!
iiiilSan Jose, CA 95110 Analysis for: % Moisure Analyzed: Jul 13, 1993!iliii
iiiilAttention: Jeff Benson First Sample #: 3G098-01 Reported: Jul 15, 1993iiiiii
LABORATORY ANALYSIS FOR:
% Moisure
Sample Sample Sample
Number Description Detection Limit Result
% mg/kg
3G098-01 SAM #1 1.0 91.4
3G098-02 SAM #2 1.0 91.6
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detectic,n.
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Su Patel
Project Manager
3G098-01.EEE < 1 >
BLANKS
'3
3
BLANKS
Lab Name: SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL Contract:
Lab Code: Case No.: CA 117204 SAS No.:
Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): TCLP EXTRACT
Preparation Blank Concentration Units (pg/L or mg/Kg): ug/L
SDG No.:
3G098
Initial
Calib. Continuing Calibration iili Prepa-
Blank Blank (pg/L) ,i ration
Analyte (pg/L) C I C 2 C 3 C l::ii Blank C M
Beryllium ?~ :?~i P
Chromium ?:i iii P
Cobalt iii P
Copper !ii P
Lead 35.4 U 35.4 U 35.4 U
Manganese .... P
Mercury CV
Nickel P
Potassium P
Selenium F
Silver P
Sodium P
Vanadium ??: P
Cyanide .... iill NR
ESC1M3.CLP FORM III - IN 7/88
SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
5A
SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Contract:
Case No.: CA117204
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SAS No.: SDG No.:-
Matrix: WATER
Level (Iow/med): LOW
% Solids for Sample:
Concentration Units (flg/L or rog/Kg dry weight): ug/L
Control
Limit Spiked Sample Sample Spike
Analyte %R Result (SSR) C Resuit (SR) C Added (SA) %R Q M
Aluminum P
Antimony F
Arsenic F
Barium P
Beryllium P
Cadmium P
Calcium P
Chromium P
Cobalt P
Copper P
Iron P
Lead 75-125 948.7000 35.40(X) U 1000.0(3 94.9 P
Magnesium P
Manganese P
Mercury Cv
Nickel P
Potassium P
Selenium F
Silver P
Sodium P
Thallium F
Vanadium P
Zinc P
Cyanide NR
Comments:
ESC1M5A. CLP
FORI~4 V (Part 1) - IN
7/88
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
Matrix: WATER
% Solids for Sample:
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
5A
SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY
Case No.: CA117204
Contract:
SAS No.:
SDG No.: -
Level (Iow/med):
EPA SAMPLE NO.
3G124-1SD
LOW
Concentration Units (pg/L or rog/Kg dry weight): ug/L
Control
Limit Spiked Sample Sample Spike
Analyte %R Result (SSR) C Result (SR) C Added (SA) %R Q M
Aluminum P
Antimony F
Arsenic F
Barium ,~ P
Beryllium P
Cadmium P
Calcium P
Chromium P
Cobalt P
Copper P
Iron P
Lead 75-125 940.2000, 35.4000 U 1000.00 94.0 P
Magnesium P
Mancjanese ~ P
Mercury CV
Nickel P
Potassium P
Selenium F
Silver P
Sodium P
Thallium F
Vanadium P
Zinc P
Cyanide NR
Comments:
ESC1M5AD.CLP FORM V (Part 1) - IN 7/88
DUPLICATES
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
Matrix (soil/water):
% Solids for Sample:
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
DUPLICATES
Case No.: CA 117204
WATER
Contract:
SAS No.:
SDG No.:
Level: (low/med)
% Solids for Duplicate:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
3G124-1S
LOW
Concentration Units ~g/L or mg/Kg dry weight): ug/'L
Control Spike Spike
Analyte Limit Sample (S) (:; ,. Duplicate (SD) C RPD Q M
Antimony ?::; iiiil F
Badum ?~ii P
Cadmium iiii P
Calcium ?:? iili P
Chromium '- .... iili P
ESC1M§.CLP FORM VI - IN 7/88
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL
Contract: 5086-91-BOA-072
Case No.: CA '117204 SAS No.: -
SDG No.: 3G098
Solid LCS Source:
Aqueous LCS Source: SOLUTIONS PLUS
Aqueous (pg/L) Solid (mg/kg)
Analyte TRUE Found %R TRUE Found C Limits %R
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic ,,
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead 1000.0 912.90 91.3
Magnesium
Uanc~anese
Memur~
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
ESC1 M7.CLP
FORI~ VII - IN 7/88
Ap ndix D - Quality Assurance Sufi~a~ Report: , ,~!_:j .~ ~"'~'"
' .. , ,. ~,. ~;~,~'~,.
~'.,'. ,.....,. -~, .::
ESC
Quality Assurance Review Summary
Soil Sampling Results
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June and July 1993
This Quality Assurance Summary covers seven soil samples and associated quality control samples
that were collected from the Mr. Piston facility in Bakersfield, California, on June 2, 1993. The samples
were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Environmental Laboratory, Inc. in Redwood City, California, for
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by U.S. EnviroJunental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8240, total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as diesel by EPA Me~od modified 8015, and California Analytical Method
(CAM) 17 metals by EPA Method 6010/7471. Two additional samples, SAM #1 and SAM #2, were
collected on July 1, 1993 and analyzed for lead by EPA Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP).
This Quality Assurance Summary discusses the analytical results for all field and laboratory quality
control samples analyzed in support of this san~pling event. All laboratory data and supporting.
information have been reviewed to ensure adherence to the specified analytical, Quality Assurance/Quality
Control (QA/QC), and chain-of-custody protocols. The results of the QA review and the effect on the
reported results are presented below and on Tables 1 through 3.
The samples arrived at the laboratory in a chilled state, accompanied by the chain of custody.
There were no problems encountered during shipping and handling of the samples between the site and
laboratory.
Summary of Laboratory Results
All samples were analyzed within the required method holding time criteria.
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
TPH as diesel was detected in samples S-0.5, S-2, S-4, and S-6. All the positive results have been
qualified "D". The "D" qualifier indicates the results was reported from a diluted sample analysis. The
samples were diluted to bring the concentration within the linear calibration range of the instrument and
method. The samples have also been qualified "B" lCecause contamination was detected in the associated
method blank.
Volatile Organic Compounds
Ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes were detected in sample S-0.5 and total xylenes were
detected in sample S-2. The results have been qualified "J". The "J" qualifier indicates the reported
results are estimated concentrations. Samples S-0.5, S-2, and S-4 showed low sfirrogate recovery for the
initial extraction. The samples were re-extracted in accordance with EPA Method 8240 and the re-
extraction also demonstrated low surrogate recovery. This indicates a matrix interference problem.
Therefore, the concentrations report for these samples are considered estimated.
CAM 17 Metals
Metals detected were antimony, barium, beryllium, c ..admium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead,
molybdenum, nickel, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc. The copper and zinc results have been qualified
"B". The "B" qualifier indicates copper and zinc were detected in the associated method blank.
TCLP Lead
The detection limit for TCLP lead was 38.7 gg/l and TCLP lead was not detected in SAM #1 or
SAM #2. All QC criteria associated with this analysis were acceptable.
Field Quality Control Samples
Field QC samples collected in support of the sampling event included one trip blank and two field
duplicate samples. Sample S-10A was a duplicate of sample S-10 and SAM #2 was a duplicate of SAM
#1.
The trip blank was prepared at the laborato~ and accompanied the sample containers to and from
the sampling event. The trip blank is used to measure cross contamination, laboratory water quality, and
laboratory sample container cleaning. The trip blardc was free of contamination.
The purpose of the field duplicate is to evaluate field sampling and laboratory precision by
comparing results of two samples taken from the same location' and to evaluate the homogeneity of the
sample matrix. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the pair of results for each analyte is
calculated and used to measure the field and laboratory precision. Generally, RPDs of 30 percent or less
are acceptable for aqueous field duplicate samples.
Sample S-10A is a duplicate of sample S-t0. Target analytes detected in both samples were
barium, chromium, copper, lead, vanadium, and zinc:. The calculated RPDs are 29.3, 21.6, 62.3, 4.7, 3.2,
and 2.9 percent, respectively. The results that ,~,re greater than 30 percent indicate possible non-
homogeneity of the sample matrix.
Laboratory Quality Control Check Samples
Laboratory QC samples analyzed in support of this project included three laboratory blanks,
laboratory QC check samples, and one matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) sample.
The laboratory blank is a volume of a cle~a reference matrix that is carried through the entire
analytical procedure. It is used to determine the levels of contamination associated with the processing
and analysis of the samples. TPH as diesel was detected in the laboratory blank for this method. The
associated sample results have been qualified "B". No target analytes were detected in the associated
laboratory blanks for the VOCs analysis. Copper and zinc were detected in the laboratory blank for the
metals analysis. The associated sample results have: been qualified "B".
The laboratory QC check samples are used to evaluate the effect of the sample matrix on the
method used for analysis. The soil samples were spiked by the laboratory with known quantities of
specific compounds as requested by the method. Th,: percent recovery and RPD of the spike compounds
were measured and compared with method spike QC limits. The percent recoveries and RPDs of the
laboratory QC check samples are with acceptable QC limits. The MS/MSD percent recoveries and RPDs
were also within acceptable QC limits.
Table 1
TPH as Diesel Analytical Results
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfieht, California
June 2, 1993 (mg/kg) (a)
S-0.5 S-2 S-4
Analyte SUMP SUMP SUMP
TPH ,as Diesel 3,500 DB 280 DB
Chromato~,mn non-diesel non-diesel diesel
Pattern
a/ ND = not detected D = diluted s,'unple ,analysis
B = ~alyte detected in associated method blank
7[0 DB
S-6
SUMP
1,100 DB
diesel
S-10
SUMP
S-10A
SUMP
S-15
SUMP
Table 2
VOC Analytical Results
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June 2, 1993 (pg/kg) (a)
Analyte
S-0.5 S-2 S-4 S-6 S-10 S-10A S-15
SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP
Acetone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
B romochlorodimethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
C,'u'bo n disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chlorobenzne ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloroform ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ., ND ND ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
cis- 1.2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ethylbenzene 360 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 980 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1, l-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Vinyl acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total xylenes 2,700 J 370 J ND ND ND ND ND
ND = not detected
J = estimated concentration
Table 3
CAM 17 Metals Analytical Results
Mr. Piston Facility
Bakersfield, California
June 2, 19913 (mg/kg) (a)
S-0.5 S-2 S-4 S-6 S-10 S-10A S-15
Anal~e SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP SUMP
Antimony 12
Arsenic ND
Barium 1.400
Beryllium ND
Cadmium 31
Chromium 120
Cob~t 13
Copper 580
Lead 8,100
Mercury ND
Molybdenum 13
Nickel 47
Selenium ND
Silver 0.62
Thallium 14
V,'madium 14
Zinc 2,600
B
B
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
6,100 8,~0 2,000
ND ND ND
3.6 3.1 ND
37 38 16
7.4 6.9 6.9
86 B 67 B 6.9
340 95 8.8
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
17 1.8 3.3
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
15 1.5 21
230 B 170 B 51
ND
ND
35
ND
ND
3.3
ND
B 6,3 B
66
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.4
B 34 B
ND
ND
47
ND
ND
4.1
ND
12 B
63
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.1
35 B
ND
ND
71
9.56
ND
9.9
6.9
13 B
8.6
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
38
47 B
~ ND = not detected
B = analyte detected in associated method blank
ESC
, , IGRRnlTE
· ...... I cOnSTRUL'TIOn
WEIGHED AT:
FOLD TO
KEI:;:I'I
DELIVERY ADDRESS
I.;.'.I!!:C Y C LIE [11. I1'11l'
,..JAI'IE:S I:,,:OA II
I
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED COMMODITY WAS
----~ WEIGHED, MEASURED OR COUNTED BY A WEIGHMASTER, WHOSE SIGNA-
TURE IS ON THIS CERTIFICATE, WHO IS A RECOGNIZED AUTHORITY OF
· X' ACCURACY, AS PRESCRIBED BY CHAPTER 7 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION
12700) OF DIVISION 5 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
J:' [!~ J!il CODE, ADMINISTERED BY THE DIVISION OF MEASUREMENT STANDARDS OF
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE.
I
WE MAKE DELIVERIES INSIDE CURB LINE AND ON THE LOT AT
CUSTOMER S RISK ONLY AND ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY WHAT-
SOEVER FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM SUCH DELIVERIES
- /(~RIVER
........................ ON j~/ OFF J'---] C0PY1 ,_-1&6'56-3-'
GROSS & TARE .......
FOB PLANT FO8 JO~ FOB PLANT & HAULING OUT
TRK NO / LIC NO OWNER I ZONE ARRIVE
I', X.{ 2 [~ 3 I:; 17{ I:;: N BA C U I{ H ON: AT JOB
QUANTI~ ORDERED I TONS QUANTITY DELIVERED / TONS ) QUANT TY TO GO / TONS DEPART
I ' :L ,, d)O ..... JOB
LOAD NO GROSS ~/TONS NET WT / TONS TARE WT / TONS
STAND
1. ] . (.} () TIME
PRODUCT CODE DESCRIPTION ORDER NO TIME
WEIb~MASTER
TRIP
GRA~ITE, CONSTRUCTION COMPANY J DEPUTY H[:.I:;:ED]:TH I'-IOSL.I]:Y MILES
FORM 156C REV. 10190 LAST ORDERED 11-92 BFU 176,400 J
WJ~J~HI~O, AT:.~ ~
6
K E F: N B A C I.:: I-I 0 IZ
DELIVERY ADDRESS
R I:!: C Y C I... E }) U M F' F:'IZ E
,_J A M E S I:;~ 0 A 0
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
WEIGHED AT:
IGRRnlTE
conmu on
company
1922
B I'", I::' I_ D.
/
t.,/
WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED COMMODITY WAS
WEIGHED, MEASURED OR COUNTED BY A WEIGHMASTER, WHOSE SIGNA-
TURE iS ON THIS CERTIFICATE, WHO IS A RECOGNIZED AUTHORITY OF
ACCURACY, AS PRESCRIBED BY CHAPTER 7 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION
i 2700) OF DIVISION 5 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
CODE, ADMINISTERED BY THE DIVISION OF MEASUREMENT STANDARDS OF
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE.
WE MAKE DELIVERIES INSIDE CURE) LINE AND ON THE LOT AT
~o,~n o RiSK ONL't' AiniO ACCEPT NO RESPONSiBiLiT~ WHAT-
SOEVER FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM SUCH DELIVERIES
~ ·. ~ DRIVER
ON ~ OFF J'---J COPY1
GROSS & TARE
DATE.. ' ,':. ; C'."', ICuST ACCT NO ICUST PO NO CUST JOIBNO ICONTRACT NO TIC~ET NO
(.,d/:11.,., :, -qE;8070 1. 1[ 6.'.~ 6~
V OUT :1. *-'" **
.. .:,. 0 7
T,K NO / L,C NO OWNER I ZONE ARR,VE
I".'.'B 2'. 8 :~: I", IZ I;; I'1 B ~ C U I:.' I'10 EJ AT JO
QUANTITY ORDERED I TONS JQUANTITY DELIVERED I TONS JQUANTITY TO GO I TONS DEPART
t
J :1.. 0 0'
JO
B
LOADNO GROSSWt ~TONS NETWT~TONS TARE WT ~TO,S
STAND
'"' ' 1. 1 . 0() TIME
PRODUCT CODE DESCRIPTION ORDER NO
TIME
F' 1. :~: T M I':;1=,: r~(')hl[~ H/HI!i:SI-I BOBTATI.. I;,' .1. 1 4 '.,
lIME
WEIGHMASTER
"' TRIP
G RANITE,.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY J D~PUTY MEI:;:E 0 ]:TII
. j' ~', " MILES
FORM 156C REV. 10/90 LAST ORDERED 11-92 BFU 176,400
DRIVER _ - ! Y'] "~ J'"') ~'~¢~[-(' - RECEIVED BY
ESC
Kern Environmental Services Laboratory No: 36515-!
P 0 Box 5337' Date Received: '?-13-93
Bakersfield, CA 93388 Date Reported: 7-23-93
Attention: Marvin R. £astep
Sample: ~rown Solid
Sample Oescrlptton:
(type i)
Mr. Piston, 4110 Wible Road, Project £-1038
S-A Composite of I-A, 2-A, 3-A, and 4-A
Sampled by Marvin R. Eastep
on 7-13-93 from ]015 to 1050 hours
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure,
Hetall
Sample Results, mg/1
Corrected' Measured
Concentration C~ncentrat!~
Arsenic, As < 0.005 < 0.005
Barium, Bm 0.81 0.8~
Chromium, Cr < 0.05 < 0.05
te~d. Pb 0.~ 0.18
N~J'c~ry,..~o < O.O00Z < O.O00:~
Silver. Ag, < 0.02 < 0.02
Values corrected based on spike recovery.
pther Constituents
No Free Liquid
RCEA
Maximum MRL Method/
~ ~/l geference
5.0 0.005 7061/1
100.0 0,1 6010/1
1,0 0.01 6010/1
5.0 0.05 6010/1
b.U 0.05 O010/1
g,~ Q,QQQ~ 7471~I
l"n ..... O.O0~ 7741YI
5.0 O.OZ 6010/I
Reference:
2. ;PA 600/4-7~-020, March 1983
3. California Department of Fish
& G;lme
J[/ccw
~4~Og Armour Avenue
(805] 395-053~
JUL--28--95 WEI) 9 .-56 KERN t)ACKHOE SERV I CE !NC;: m-- e:).:,
MOM
ZALCO LABORATOI:::tlES, INC.
Analytical Consulting Senvioes,
Kern Envtronr~ntal Services
P 0 Box 5337
BakersFi'etd, t"A 93308
Laboratory Ho:
Date Received:
Date ~epayted:
36516-2
7-13-95
7-23-93
Attention: Marvia-R. Eastep
Sample: Brown Solid (type i)
S-B Composite of l-B, 2-B, 3-B, 4-B, 5-B, 6-B, 7-B, and 8-B
Sampled by Harvin R. Eastep
on 7-13-93 from llI5 to 1155 hours
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, 1311/1
Sample Results.
Corrected' Measured
Concentrati oft ~;oncent~_mti
Arsenic, As < 0.005 < 0.005
Barium, Ba 1.I 1.1
Cadmium, Cd 0.015 0.014
Ch,omtum, Cr · O.0S < 0.05
Lead, Pb 0.12 0.11
Mercury, Hg < 0.0002 < 0.0002
$~lentum, Se < 0.005 < 0.00~
Silver, Ag. < 0.02' < 0.02
Other..Co~ti~u_e_Q_t_t
No ~ree klqulO
RCRA
Maximum MRL met:oo/
Cone. mq/) ~ference
5,0 0.005 7061/i
100.0 0.1 6010/1
1.0 0.01 6010/1
5.0 0,0~ iOlO/1
~,0 0.05 6010/1
0,2 0.000~ 7471/1
l.O 0.005 7741/1
5.0 0,0~ 6010/1
MRL - Minimum Reporting Level
Reference: 1. EPA SW-846, lg86 3rd Edition.
2. EPA 600/4-7~-020, March 1982.
3. California Department of Fish & Game
JE/ccw
,4G08 Armour Avenus
Lab Operations Manager
B~<ersfield. Californl~ @3308_
Zal(:~ L~b · ' .' ·
ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC.
4sos~.~. Chain of Custody Recerd F~
933C~
[~0~ ~5-0~9 .....
·
FROM TO cJ58~la,3 P. 02 .
SOIL PROFILI~ ~
GENERAL INFORMATION
CleauSoils Inc. Project No.:
CLient: ~VO~C Q Generator:.
Address:
~t~d Q~ntity: ~ _.~ ~ _ D Tons or ~ Cubic Y~ds
;on~ation Sou~ (Ch~ a~ ~at apply):
~ Und~o~d T~ ~ O~ol~e
~ Above~o~d Ta~ G Diesel F~I
U Pi~lin~ ~ Avia~on Fuel
~ S~a~ ~pill ~ No.. Furl Oa
B. SOIL C~~ISTICS (Ch~k ~ ~at spply):
3 Gravel ~ Clay ~ Coh~ive ~ Appca~ D~
~ Coar~ Sa~d ~Sandy ~lay
~ Fin~S~ty Sand ~ Orgamc D FHable ~ Sat~a~d
~ctual Fines P~s~g No. 2~: % Actual Moist~ Con.nc
C. ANAL~ICAL
[~'Motor 0tl
Cl Bunker Oil
Cl Crude Oil
[] Other.
Rocks P~sent
Debris Pxe~ent
~,ttach analytical reports for composite sol1 samples with the following minimum frequency: I sample for lc,ss than
500 tons (350 cy); :2 samples for ]ess than 1,000 tons (700 cy); and l sample for each additional 1,000 tons.
13 Projec~ invol ring o~ly vJ,',ff~ petrole~,~ ~roducts (Provide mquesled dam):
· Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) __~ ppm to .... ppm by EPA Me,od ___ _
· Total Bcnzcne, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylenes (BTEX) "Ppm to ___._. ppm
· Benzene ppm to . ppm · Total Lead ppm to . . . ppm
I~I All Other Projects (Provide the £oliow~g lab repo.rts-addtdonal dam may be ~¢quested):
· TPH by EPA Method 418.1/8015 · BTF. X by EPA Method 8020
· Total H .cavy Metals · Total Halogenated Compounds
D. CERTIFICATION
[ hereb, y .ce. rdfy .~a.t ~his information is a complete an~ ac. ccu.'a.~e repr. eseatat, ion of the subject soil and all known or
ms .p?c~eo na,?ros. ~a.ve .b~p disclosed. ! £urti~r certily tl~at thc su'bjec.t soil is not hazardous b~. federal or state .
regmations, ~ unaersmncl that only non-hazardous soflwili be acceptect at CleanSoils Inc. facihtles and no soil will be
accepWJ without ~ pro,fly executed agmcmenC
j~rarl
J~i~ Brown
El Black
Well, Tank No.
Field or Area
111ANSPOIITATlON,
P.O. BOX 5295 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93388
(805) 589-5220
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER RECORD
TO BE USED FOR NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES ONLY
N7102124
GENERATOR" I (Generator Must Complete)
Name /[! .~.CVc -
Field Address
City, State, Zip ~5FI6~. C~
Phone ~~~ ~J' 6/00
Order Placed By
Sig~r~ o~thorized Agent
?3.30
Title
WASTE TO BE DISPOSED
Type ..Co/L.
Generating Location W/lO
Special Handling Instructions:
[] Gloves [] Goggles
Quantity
DESIGNATED FACILITY
Name ~_-.~/¢'
Address ~-I ~-~ P~.~
City, State, Zip
[] Other
TRANSPORTER, ! (Hauler Must Complete)
Name ~'~/'-~
Address
City, State,
Phone~
Signature of Authorized Agent or Driver
Date
DISPOSAL FACILITY :1 (Facility Operator Must Complete)
City, State, Z'p ~-~ ~----~ .
Pho.e
Siget~/horized Ag~
Date
GENERATOR COPY
Ticket
Pick Up Date
Unit No./"~-- ~'~'"'
Time
NOTE: This form to be used in lieu of the California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Waste Manifest for NON-HAZARDOUS wastes only.
REMARKS:
Time [] PM
DISPOSAL METHOD: [] Surface Impougfl~f'ent ~ [] I~jection
Return Copy To: GENERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE sPECIFIED{/'~'''- '
NOTE: It is not necessary to send copy to Dept. of Health Services.
NO HAZARDOUS FEES SHOULD BE LEVIED
5~90
Well, Tank No.
Field or Area
P.O. BOX 5295 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93388
(805) 589-5220
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER RECORD
TO BE USED FOR NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES ONLY
GENERATOR ] (Generator Must Complete)
WASTE TO BE DISPOSED
N°.102125
Field Address
City, State, Zip
Phone dOP'_b q~' 6100
Order Placed
Signature of. Authorized Agent
~,3-'Xo I
Title
TRANSPORTER ] (Hauler Must Complete)
Si~gnatur~.~/uthorized Ag..~
Name /¢"¢'..,¢
Address ~ O.
City, State, Zip
Phone ~
Signa~~t~t or Driver
DISPOSAL FACIUTY '~ (Facility Operator Must Complete) Name cO,~
City, State, ZiT'-
Date
GENERATOR COPY
1Type ,_~"O I L- '
Generating Location /-]J/O . IJ/,~t.~ /~,D. L~F/-,/
Special Handling Instructions:
[] Gloves [] Goggles
Quantity .~O ~,~c.~r
DESIGNATED FACILITY
Name ~'f..¢~ed _.~'Olt,.
Address ,~. / ~'X
City, State, Zip
P h oneF~/~O_~'b
Unit No. /~t'//--- /
, Time~r'' (_dl_) [] p~
') )~,~
Ticket # O/L/L/~ I
Pick Up Date ~'--' ~,l~-' ~)....~
[] Other
Quantity Received 2¢,l ~~'ate
DISPOSAL METHOD: [] Surface Impo~ ID_' I"1 Injecii0n
E] Landfill i~Other ~ I,t'".7._.~(i. '~':~',..
Return Copy' To: GENERAIOR UNLESS O11t£R~15£
NOI£: It is not necessary to send co~y to Dept. o! Health Ser¥ices.
NO HAZARDOUS FEES SHOULD BE LEVIED
5/90
NOTE: This form to be used in lieu of the California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Waste Manifest for NON-HAZARDOUS wastes only.
REMARKS:
¢Vell, Tank No.
:ield or Area
P.O. BOX 5295 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93388
(805) 589-5220
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER RECORD
TO BE USED FOR NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES ONLY
N9102126
.., GENERATOR
I(Generator Must Complete)
Name /v/~E.V¢ --
Field Address
Phone [~
~/oo
WASTE TO BE DISPOSED
1Type .So I ~--
Generating Location
Special Handling Instructions:
[] Gloves [] Goggles
Quantity _A"
Order Placed By
Signature of Authorized Agent
Title
[] Other
Bbl
TRANSPORTER ' ,~ (Hauler Must Complete)
Name ,/,~'¢~r
Address /~o o, ~0
City, State, Zip
Phone ~
Sign~ure of Authorized Agent or Driver /
DISPOSAL FACILITY (Facility Operator Must Complete)
Name ~~
Address 2/~ _
Signature of Au~ ~t / ~ ~ Date
FORMKVS-T-20 [ / - / GENERATOR COPY
DESIGNATED FACILITY
Name (~
Address
City, State,
Phone C~"O-X'_~
Ticket cf _4' ,,"~)z~ ~/~.7,¢~
Unit No. ,~-'~'"' /~"-'~¢ ~'
Pick Up Date c~'Z~'"~ Time
NOTE: This form to be used in lieu of the California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Waste Manifest for NON:HAZARDOUS wastes only.
REMARKS:
E'.- /o3 ~'
",..,
DISPOSAL METHOD: [] Surface ImpouQdment_. . E]~lnjecti0n":'::
Return Copy To: GENERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ",
NOTE: It is not necessary to send copy to Dept. of Health Services.
NO HAZARDOUS FEES SHOULD BE LEVIED