HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK- C -05/04/90
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
~Rf" ".:~
RESOURCE ~?NT
DEPART~~~.,NMENTAL
May 4, 1990
2700 I'~ Slreel. Suite 300
Bakerlfleld, CA 93301
Telep:~one (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
Ralph Huey
City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Division
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
SUBJECT:
Location :
Known As :
Permit # :
2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield, CA
Fire Station #1
160013
Dear Mr. Huey:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at
the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency
was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this
office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the
California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future
operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up
existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause
or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water
quality or public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site
may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the
property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report
content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
If you havre any questions regarding this matter,
(805) 86]~c3636.
n'rl,
~is Burge~q~, R.E.H.S;
Program Manager
Environmental Heal th Services Department
please contact Dolores Gough at
CB:DG:cas
cc:
Pacific Geotechnical Associates
Central Velley Regional Water Quality Control Board
\160013.clt
FIN510A
STATE' RESOURCES CONTROL
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PILOT PROGRAM
(916) 739~2464/739-2409
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP SITE INVOICE
08/15/90
TO
RALPH HUEY
2130 "G" STREET
BAKERSFIELD
CA 93301
RE
BAKERSFIELD FIRE STATION #1
2101 "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD CA 93301
PREVIOUS BALANCE AS OF
PAYMENT(S) RECEIVED AS OF
NEW CHARGES* AS OF
SITE # 160013
12/18/89 $ 237.73
02/16/90 $ 237.73
03/31/90 $ 1,530.46
FUND: F TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1,530.46
ENTER'AMOUNT PAID AND RETURN ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH CHECK OR MONEY ORDER
PAYABLE TO STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. PLEASE WRITE THE SITE NUMBER ON
THE CHECK OR MONEY ORDER. PAYMENT DUE IN 30 DAYS. MAIL CHECK TO:
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
P.O. BOX 944212
SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120
* See itemized list of new charges on attached sheet(s).
February 6, 1990
Site Characterization
Report
FIRE STATION NO. 1
City of Bakersfield
Submitted to:
Kern County Environmental Health Department
~ical Associates, Inc.
4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (805) 832-7490
ific Geotechnic l Associates, Inc.
[ 4664 American Avenue ·
Ms. Delores Gough
Environmental Health Services
Kern County
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
alif. 93309 · (805)832-74gg
February 6, 1990
Underground Tank Site Characterization
Fire Statibn No. 1, 2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield CA
Permit #: 160013
Dear Ms. Gough:
Attached for you consideration is one copy of the Site Characterization
Report for the City of Bakersfield's underground fuel tank removal project at Fire
Station No. 1.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me
at the telephone number shown above.
Sincerely,
Randall T. Melz,~~.G.
CC:
R. Huey
Hazardous Materials Div.
City of Bakersfield
City of Bakersfield
Fire Station No. I Site Characterization
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................
210 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................... 2.1 Site History
3.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...........................................
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Soil Sampling Procedures
4.0 FINDINGS ....................................................
4.1 Soil Profile.
5.0 EVALUATION .................................................
5.1 Introduction 4
5.2 Diesel Tank Site 5
5.3 Gasoline Tank Site 5
5.4 Groundwater 5
6.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 6
6.1 Introduction 6
6.2 Findings 6
6.3 Risks 6
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REMEDIATION ......................... :. 7
7.1 Introduction 7
7.2 Option 1/ No Action 7
7.3 Option 2/ Excavation of Contaminated Soil 8
7.4 Option 3/ Vapor Extraction 9
7.5 Recommendation 9
8.0 CLOSING ......... : ........................................... 10
PAGE
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
'i
Fire Station No. 1 Site Characterization
Table of Contents (Con'td)
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure No.1- Plan View of Site and Preliminary Findings
Figure No.2- Plan View of Site and Soil', Boring Locations
Figure No.3-. Vertical Cross Sectional.View of Soil Borings
Figure No.4- Plan View of Site and Lateral Extent of Contamination
APPENDICES
Appendix A Preliminary Investigationt Results
Appendix B - Logs of Soil Borings
Appendix C - Laboratory Results
Appendix D - Chain of Custody Documents
ii
1.l]~ Introduction
This report details site characterization studies conducted at the City of
Bakersfields, Fire Station #1 on December 4th, 5th and 19th by Pacific Geotectmical
Associates, Inc. (PGA). The purpose of this work was to determine the extent of
product plumes resulting from two separate, leaking underground storage tanks
which had been removed from the property located at 2101 H St (Fire Station #1).
This report contains backgro, und information regarding the site, a
description of the study methodology, and subsequent findings. An evaluation with
conclusions and recommendations for site remediation alternatives are also
discussed. The appendices to this report contain preliminary investigation findings,
a log of the exploratory soil borings, laboratory results and chain of custody records.
2.0 Project Description
2.1 Site History
The City of Bakersfield owns property in Bakersfield at 2101 "H" Street
which co'vers one city block. This property is the site of Fire Station gl, the offices of
the City's Hazardous Materials Division and two small storage buildings (Figure 1).
The Fire Station occupie~ the southeast comer, with the other buildings located on
the northwest comer of the block. The remaining surface area of the block is paved
with asphalt, with the exception of a concrete driveway and some concrete sidewalks
around the peripheries of the buildings.
The site had also served as a location for a schoolhouse (circa 1919).
Brick blocks and other debris from this structure was encountered in the upper
several feet of soil borings (see appendix B).
2/6/90
Page 2
Figure 1 shows the location of the diesel and gasoline tank sites as well
as laboratory analysis of soil samples taken beneath the tanks during preliminary
investigations (see Appendix A). In March of I989, a 550 gallon underground diesel
fuel tank was removed from the site after records indicated it had lost 400 to 500
gallons of fuel over a three day period in February of 1989. .Subsequently, having
failed a pressure test within the last year, a 550 gallon underground gasoline fuel
tank was removed at the site in May of 1989. N° significant fuel loss had been noted
for this tank from inventory reconciliation. However, laboratory analyses at two and
six feet beloTM the tank indicate leakage had occurred.
The dispensers were located immediately adjacent to both tanks,
therefore, all sources of product were confined to the tank sites.
3.0 Purpose and Scope
3.1 Introduction
The purpose and scope of this study was to define the vertical and lateral
extent of product plumes associated with the two leaking underground fuel storage
tanks' at the site, and to ascertain if any product had reached the water table. The
sampling program described below was followed to achieve this end.
3.2 Soil Sampl}ng Procedures
On December 4th and 5th, 1989, four exploratory soil borings were
drilled at the locations shown on Figure 2. Licensed personnel of Pacific
Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (PGA) supervised soil boring operations and collected
and described samples. Drilling services were provided by Melton Drilling, of
Bakersfield.
Soil boring locations were selected by PGA personnel, and the positions
of the borings were determined using a measuring tape and a Brunton'compass. Soil
borings #1, #2, #3, and #4 were drilled using a Mobile Drill B-53 drill rig equipped
with a eight inch diameter, continuous flight, hollow stem auger. A continuous log
of the soils encountered during the soil borings was recorded. Undisturbed soil
samples were obtained from the soil boring when recovery-permitted. Samples for
)
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, lNG. · Bakersfield
2/6/90
Page 3
l~boratory analysis were taken at irlter~tals of approximately five feet begihning at a
depth of ten feet in soil borings #1 and #2, and 5 feet in soil borings #3, g4 and #5,
SamPles were collected using the Maas system and a split spoon sampler lined with
brass rings. Penetration rates such as blow counts cannot be taken when using the
Maas system. Split spoon sample barrels of 1.5, 2.0 and 4.0 foot lengths were used to
improve drilling times and soil recovery'. Brass rings used in sampling were 2.5
inches in diameter and 6 inches in .length.
Soil boring #5 was hand augured by PGA personnel using an AMS Soil
Recovery Auger, Model SPA-ST. Samples were taken with the hand auger using a 2
· inch by 6 inch brass ring which was inserted for sampling when sample depth was
reached. While the method for drilling differed, all Other field sampling techniques
remained the same as those soil borings drilled with the Mobile Drill B-53.
Soil descriptions were made by a geologist, and consisted of soil type,
grain size, color, inclusions, odor, and other distinguishing featt/res.
An Organic Vapor Monitor (OVM) detector by Thermo Environmental
Instruments Inc, Model 580B, was used to field screen samples for volatile organic
compounds (VOC's). This 'measurement was recorded in pans per million (ppm)
calibrated to isobutylene, and was taken from the shoe of the sampler.
Laboratory samples were labelled, then capped with teflon tape and
plastic covers. The covers were sealed with duct tape. An ice chest was used to
maintain the samples at' 4°C until delivered to SMC Laboratories in Bakers'field. The
Chain of Custody procedures were strictly followed (see Appendix C). Samples were
analyzed for benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene (BTXE) and total
hydrocarbon (TPH) as gasoline and diesel using EPA methods 3810/8020 and
3510/8020 with a flame ionization detector (FID). The results of the analysis are
presented in Appendix C and are sumrnarized in Figure 3.
The split spoon sampler and the brass tubes were washed with TSP and
rinsed with distilled water between samples to insure quality control. Boring ceased
when successive field screening measurements fell below 5 ppm using the OVM.
After the samples were obtained and the operations complete, the bore holes were
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL. ASSOICATES, INC, · Bakersfield
filled with concrete.
2/6/90
Page 4
Spoils from the augured soil borings were placed in 55 gallon
drums, sealed and stored on site.
4.0 Findings
4.1 Soil Profile
As seen in Figure 3, the soil profile generally consisted of medium to
coarse grained, poorly sorted sands with occasional clay lenses and pebbles down to a
depth of 20 to 25 feet. The grain sizes of the sands displayed a tendency to fine
uPward. As seen in soil borings #1 and #3, the coarse sand is underlain by a
conglomerate which contains sand and cobbles to three inches in diameter. This unit
extends to a depth of approximately 46 feet and is then underlain by coarse sand to a
depth of 50 feet, the maximum depth reached in soil boring gl. These soils and the
apparent fining upward cycles are consistent with a braided river bed environment.
Visual observations indicated soil moisture levels typical of the vadose
zone.. There was no indication that the water table was penetrated.
A detailed description of the soils encountered in the borings is
presented in Appendix B of this report.
5.0 Evaluation
5.1 Introduction
This section evaluates the findings of the investigation to better deYelop
conclusions and recommendations regarding this site. The evaluation is based on 'the
results of observations and laboratory data. The purpose and scope of the
investigation was to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of diesel and
gasoline contamination to ascertain if any product reached the groundwater, and to
present options for appropriate remedial action.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC. · Bakersfield
2/6/90
Page 5
5.2 Diesel Tank Site
The diesel tank site was characterized vertically by soil boring gl and
horizontally by soil borings #3 and #4. The laboratory analysis and field screening
values for VOC's are presented for each soil boring in Figure 3. Only soil boring gl
had detectable concentrations of ~TPH as diesel in samples.
The boundary of detectable TPH/BTXE as presented in Figure 3 extends
from 9.5 feet to a depth of approximately 32 feet and has a maximum radius of
approximately 9 feet. The volume of soil within this plume boundary is
approximately 150 cubic yards. The boundary of TPH diesel concentrations above
5000 ppm is also presented in Figure 3. It extends from 9.5 feet to approximately 23
feet and has a volume of approximately 13 cubic yards. A plan view of this plume is
presented in Figure 4.
The VOC's detected by field screening procedures in soil boring #3 from
17 to 24 feet are interpreted to be the result of a halo of very mobile VOC% around the
plume.
5.3 Gasoline Tank Site
The gasoline tank site was characterized vertically by soil boring #2
and horizontally by soil boring #5. Only one sample in soil boring #2 had detectable
concentrations of TPH as gasoline.
The boundary of detectable TPH/BTXE presented in Figure 3 extends
from seven feet to a depth of less than lt5 feet and has a radius of approximately four
feet. A plan view of this plume is presented in Figure 4. The volume of soil within
the plume boundary is approximately nine
cubic yards. Based on analysis of sample #2-A in soil boring #2, the concentration of
TPH as gasoline in this plume does not exceed 1200 ppm.
5.4 Groundwater
The diesel tank site has, the largest plume and highest product
concentrations. It, therefore, poses the greatest potential threat to groundwater. Soil
boring #1 was drilled to a total depth of 50 feet without encountering groundwater.
The lower extent of the product plume at the diesel site is approximately 32 feet. The
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, IN~. · Bakersfield
2/6/90
Page 6
1988 Water Supply Report published by the Kern County Water Agency indicates that
the depth to groundwater in the Spring of 1989 was approximately 100 feet. Based on
this, the base of the plume is 68 feet or more above groundwater.
6.0 Conclusions
6.1 Introduction
The diesel and gasoline tank sites at the City of Bakersfield Fire Station
#1 have been characterized for the vertical and horizontal extent of product plumes
associated with tank leakage. Five soil borings ranging in depth from 50 to 14.5 feet
were drilled and 21 soil samples were analyzed for TPH and BTXE. A plan view and a
cross sectional view of the plumes of contamination are included in this report.
6.2 Findings
Of the two sites, the diesel tank site has the largest product plume and
the highest concentrations of product in the soil. This plume involves ,approximately
150 cubic yards of. soil and extends from '9.5 to 32 feet in depth. Maximum
concentrations of TPH gasoline and TPH diesel were measured at the diesel site as 110
ppm and 10,000 ppm respectively. No free product was found in any of the soil
samples.
The gasoline tank site has a significantly smaller product plume
involving approximately 9 cubic yards of ,soil which extends to a depth of less than 15
feet. The highest concentration of product as TPH gasoline in the soil at this site was
measured at 1,200 ppm. No TPH diesel was detected.
6.3 Risks
Neither site poses a present or reasonable future threat to groundwater.
Because the sources of contamination have been removed, significant expansion of
these plumes are not expected providing: that no driving mechanism is introduced
(such as excessive surface water percolation). The base of the deepest plume is at
least 68 feet above the water table.
A potential concern for both sites is the possibility of the accumulation
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC. · BokersfielO
2~6/90
Page 7
of explosive vapors. Over time, volatile gases emanating from the plumes could
collect under paved surfaces or foundations of adjacent buildings or .even within
buildings. These vapor pockets could possibly pose a threat to health and/or safety.
The choice of remediation technique should include steps 'to minimize this risk.
7.0 Remedial Action Options
7.1 Introduction
Three remedial options are presented for the tank sites.
take into consideration the following:
These options
1. The sites do not pose an immediate threat to groundwater.
2. Potential migration routes of the contaminants include
downward migration due to excessive percolation of
surface waters and upward migration of volatile vapors.
3. Vapors from the sites could pose potential concerns.
Supervision, testing and quality control for any of the mitigation
alternatives has not been included in these cost, analyses. These estimates have been
developed only for providing a general comparison between the three alternatives
and should not be used for preliminary budgeting purposes,
7.2 Option 1/ No Action (Natural Biodegradation)
No remedial action will be taken. The tank sites will be raised at least six
inches to prevent surface runoff from percolating into the ground. This will be
accomplished by constructing cement or brick borders around the margins of the.
sites and infilling with clean soil. The borders will stand at least six inches above the
surrounding pavement. The surfaces of the tank sites will be covered with 'pea
gravel to prevent soil erosion. No impermeable barriers such as plastic sheeting will
be placed between the surface and the affected soil. This will eliminate the
possibility of, accumulation of potentially dangerous gase.s.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC. · Bakersfield
2/6/90'
Page 8
Concentrations of contaminates will decrease with time due to; 1) the
removal of the sources of product, 2) the fact that. the sites will be open to natural
ventilation and 3) natural biodegradation processes which are already active. The
time required for the TPH and BTXE concentrations to be reduced significantly or to
non-detectable levels in the soil cannot be known without monitoring.
Kern County Water Agency depth tO groundwater maps will be inspected
annually to determine if there is a thre:at that groundwater may rise to plume depths.
Potentially dangerous vapors rising from the plume will travel upward
to the surface and will not have an opportunity to congregate in pockets or travel
along the underside of the asphalt parking lot.
This option is feasible-and will cost $1,500 per site or less to implement.
7.3 Option 2/ Excavation of Contaminated Soils
The contaminated soils will be excavated from the sites and transported
to an approved disposal site. The excavations will be sampled at total depth and
analyzed for TPH and BTXE. When samples are recovered which test contamination
below action levels recommended by Kern County Environmental Heath Services, the
excavations will be filled with clean soil and compacted to meet City building codes.
The excavations should be backfilled with soil free of contamination,
organics and debris and should be non-expansive and granular in nature. The
import fill material should be certified as clean prior to use.
This option is feasible but will require engineering supervision to
ensure that building foundations are not compromised. The costs for excavation and
disposal, soil testing, and backfilling are estimated at $20,000 for the diesel site and
$3,000 for the gasoline site. Additional costs will be incurred if additional soil
compaction and engineering services are needed.
Because all of the soil with concentrations above action levels will be
removed, following this operation neither site will pose a threat to groundwater, and
the possibility of vapor explosion will be eliminated.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC, · Bakersfield
2/6/90
Page 9
7.4 Option 3/ Vapor Extraction
Vapor extraction wells will be installed to Ventilate and extract the
volatile hydrocarbon fractions from each site. The extracted hydrocarbons will be
trapped in an air filtration device which will meet specification and permit
requirements of the Kern County Air Pollution Control District.
This option is a feasible ~nethod of cleaning the gasoline site to
acceptable 'TPH and BTXE levels. BTXE and other aromatic fractions at the diesel site
will be significantly reduced, but TPH l¢:vels will be less dramatically affected.
The cost to install and operate the extraction units will be approximately
the same for both sites. Installation will be approximately $5,000 per site. Operation
costs are not estimated but will be greatly affected by the efficiency of the
installations. The final cost of this remediation option must also include monitoring
of sites, removal of extraction units and report to verify the results of the
remediation. This process could cost between $30,000 and $40,000 depending on the
rate of extraction.
District.
Vapor extraction will require review by the Air Pollution Control
7.5 Recommendation
Option 1 is recommended as the most cost effective remedial action
alternative for both sites. Biodegradation~ is a natural process, and the threat to the
environment by the existing plumes is minimal. Removal
of the contaminated soil at a later time will still be a viable option if
current groundwater conditions change.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC, · Bakersfield
2/6/9O
Page 10
8.0 Closing
This report is intended for the exclusive use of the City of Bakersfield.
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. assumes no responsibilit~ nor liability for the
reliance herein or use hereof by anyone other than the above named client. In
addition, all of the laboratory work cited in this report was prepared under the
supervision of Start Comer of SMC Laboratory, Bakersfield, and is solely responsible
for the contents and conclusions of the laboratory.
Respectfully submitted,
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOICATES, INC. · Bakersfield
B/T/X/E/TPH ugm/gm
2 Feet ND/.39/12.44/.24/13.07
6 Feet ND/.54/10.49/.17/11.20
550 Gallon Underground ,~--.-'----~
(,5asoline Storage Tank [.. -r'.....,~.~
Fire Station
No. 1
.... ~ B/r/X/E/rPH ugm/gm
3.5/3.7/15.1/2.6/6300
550 Gallon Underground
Diesel Fuel Storage Tank
Storage
Storage
Fire
Administration
mm m memmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mm ~ mmmmmmmmmm#mmmmmmm~mmmmmmmm
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
City of Bake~'sfield, Fire Station No. 1
Plan View of Site
and
PreliminarY Findings
Site Characterization & Remedial Action Analysis
Fiaure 1, I IBMH
Approximate Scale (ft)
0 10 20 30 40
I ..... I I
Fire Station
No. I
Fire'
Administration
550 gallon
Diesel Fuel Storage Tank
Storage
550 gallon
Gasoline Storage Tank
Storage
H Street
Pacific Geotechnical Associcrtes. Inc.
City of Bakersfield, Fire Station No. 1
Plan View of Site and Boring Locations
Site Characterization & Remedial Action Analysis
~ I BMR/ELF
Figure 2. I ! 1/9/90
(~) Soil Boring Location
Approximate Scale
0 10 20 30 40
I I I I I
3orlng ~
0.3
0.5
~ 0.00
~ 1.00
~ 1
.,-1.00 Conglomerate
· ~- ~.00 ,~ j
,.,~.o0 ~-- $¢?, & clay
J?
~ounda~ of Plume - Soil
vitl3 Detectable Levels of
~ydrocarbons
~ounday of Soil with TPH
)iesel above 5000 ppm.
~-G/TPH-D
3/T/X/E
Gas~ne in ug~g
'J Petroleum H~oca~t~n
D~ese~ in u~/g
;erie in
ne m ug/g
=oenzene in ug,'g
' readings m
iai of
Soil Boring ,~1 Soil Boring #3
Ground Level
,Soil Boring ~ Soil BOnng #5
.lean Fill.
~ ", ',,~ .~ .:.:q ~.0.'~
J- _
\I'?i:'- ':'"'
TD - 22.0'
LEGEND
CLAY
SILTY CLAY
SiLT
FINE SAND
MEDIUM SAND
COARSE SAND
PEBBLEY SAND
CONGLOMERATE
FILL SOIL
Scale
Feet
5
Pacific Geotechnlcal Assoc:
Cib/of Bakersfield, Fire Stati(
Vertical Cross Section Through S~
Site Ch~--'tertzation & RemecilaJ Acco~
, F~ure 3. J '
SE Soft Boring
Soil Bortng ~
Soil Bo
ND/ND
ND,/N D/N D/NI~
~.? ? ,? .. 0.5
ND/ND 10'- i~':.:'~': 0.00
NOYND~ND~ND I
NO/ND 7.....~d ,.., 00 Conglomerate
ND/ND~ND/NC~ ,~.' .'. · ' ~
TD. 2~.5'
Boundary of Plume - Soil
~wilh Detectable Levels of
Hydrocarbons
Bounday of Soil with TPH
Diesel above 5000 ppm.
TPH-G/TPH-D
B/T/X/E
TPH-G....TotaJ Petn~eum HyOroca~cx~
as C..~,~o~ne in ug~g
TPH-D....Tota~ Pe~'oteum H~
a ........... Benzene ~n ug/g
T ............ Toluene in ug/g
X ............ Xyiene in u,g/g
E ........... Elhylbm~zene in ug/g
~ OVM reading= in I;~m
m Inle~vaJ o~ Sarape
Clean Older Flll
Fill.
Diesel
Tank
Site
.24~.10/.88Y.26
/
I
I
Fire Station
No. 1
Fire
Administration
'~Storage
\
. 550 gallon
Gasoline Fuel
· Tank Site
Diesel Fuel
Tank Site
Storage
mmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
H Street
Core Hole Location
Pocific Geofechnicol Associotes, Inc.
City of Bakersfield, Fire Station No. 1
Site Plan Showing Lateral Extent of Plume
and
Line of Cross SeCtion
Site Characterization & Remedial Action Analysis
1/9/~10
I
I
I
· !
I
Maximum Extent of
Detectable Plume
Approximate Scale Trace of
0 10 20 30 40 Cross Section
I I I I I
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Investigation Results
Anai~icai Chemistry
Client Name: Groundwa%e? Resources, Inc.
Ad~ress : 5610 District Blvd., Suite 106
Baker~fiel(i, CA 93313
Date samples received : 3-03-89
Date analysis completed: 3-08-89
Dace of report : 3-08-89
Laboratory No. 572 ·
Project No. ?80ltl
Purchase Order No. 2274
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#S72
ID: S-2 ugm/gm MRL,ugm/gm
Benzene 3.5 0.1
Toluene 3.7 0.1
Ethylbenzene 2.8 0.1
p-X¥1ene 5.5 0.1
m-X¥iene 6.S 0.!
o-Xy!ene 2.8 0.1
Isopropy!benzene ND 0.1
TPH (Diesel) 6,300 1.0
M~thod of Analysis: California DOHS LUFT manual
MRL = Minimum Reporting Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per lram
ND = Not de,acted
S tan Comer
3191) Pegas,.~ Drive · Baker~fieJd, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Sox 80835 . f~kersfietd. C.A 932~0 · FAX (805) 393-3623
?EJ'R~'~£U~I~' J..L ~GLIN, :'EG. CMEM. ~NGiL
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, C,~LIFORNIA 93208 PHONE 227-4911
McNabb Cona~actlon
7808 Olcc~n.Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attenuicn:Br/anMcHabb
Pe~oieum .~drccarbonz
( SOIL )
Da~e of
Repor-~:
· Lab No.: 3364-1.
S~mpie Desc.: Ci~; of F~k~_~fie!d
~ 2!~ & "'H" St. 2' Ga.sa~l.ine
DATE SAM3LE DATE ~--~3LE DATE SAMPLE DATE. ANALYSIS
COr,r,~: RECEIVED ~ LAB: ~TRA~: CC~T~:
04-~ny-89 04-.~ay-89 . (]9-~my-89 ll~ay-89
Repor%%-~ Analysis
Ccnati '~_nt Unita Re_~ulta Level
lneT_~o! eum
Hyd_~carbons ug/g None Dete~--=d 500. O0
Total Pet .....
Hydrocarbons , ug/g 13.07 O. 02
TEST ME?HOD: California Sta"r-,e D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Diesel
(Carbon Di_~d ?4-de Lx~--ac-~icn)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDRCCARBCNS:
C~l~?ornia D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
' '"',7' '~'""~/
The ~ total of all constituen~
Robert P!aisance
C%~emist
4100 PIERC.~ RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93208 PHONE 327-4911
(SOIL)
McNabb Conar-~ucZ~ion
7808 Olcot~ Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
At~_=n%ion: Bz-zan Mc~]abb
Date of
Repor'~:
Lab No.: 3~S4-2
Sample Peso.: CiT; of '~_akers. fieid
DATE_ ~.2~M3r.,E DATE S;-MPr-Z. DATE- SA~3r~
COI,r,~: RE~--U;ED 9 LAB: ~~:
04-.~_.ay- 89 04-~ay-89 09-.U. ay-89
Rel:or'~ir.~ Analysis
Con.~i~n~ Units Result~
DATE AN~£YSiS
CC~P~:
ll-~.ay-89
Level
Benzene ug/g None Detect-_sd O. 02
Tolu~e u~/g O. 54 :0.02
E~2-~i P~_nzene ug/g O. 17 O. 02
p-Xyiene ug,/g 2.07 O. 02
m-l~[yl~_ne ug/g 4.94 O. 02
Petroleum
Hyd_--z~r~n~ ug/g None Det~c*~d
Total Pet. .--
Hyd_,~m~r~ - ug/g 11.20
O. 02
TEST ~E~I~IOD: Califorr_i~ S~a~ D.O.H.S. T., .H. for Diesel
(Carbon Disulfide F~c~ac-.ion)
S~-~p. le ~xS~bits g~_=o!ine c2"_~mato _gr~_pkic fingerprint
Gasoline TFH: 257.77 ugJg
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDRCCARECNS: T~: ~m total of ail constitu~nr~
on t,his
Rober~ P!aiaanc~
Chemist
APPENDIX B
Log,,; of Soil Borings
c~-
,Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: 8oil Borlag #1
Site Address: 2101 H St. Fire Station Number I . Date: 12/4/89 Page: I of 2
Location of Boring: Diesel Tank Site Elevation:
Drilling Contractor: Melton Drilling PGA Personnel: Brian Itir~t 'Kart Fuqua
Driller: Randy Walton Rig Type'. Mobile Drill B-53 Total Depth: 50.0 ft
OVA Detector Type: TEI 580 PGA Job Number: COB001
Rec. OVM Lab. Sample Tlrne
Depth . Uthologic Description (%) (pprn) Design. Depth (24 hrs)
0-9.0' 0.0'-9.0' Clean fill at Tank Site described from 09:05
augured cutting
9.0'-10.5' 9.0'-10.0' loose fill grading to off stained sandy 100 66 lA I0.0'- 09:38
silt; 10.0' -10.5' Sand, grey, coarse ~'aln, 10.5'
poorly sorted, petroleum odor, no visible stain.
10.5~12.0' 11.1' Base of Itll. Sand, grey, coarse grain, poorly 100 23 09:50
sorted, massive,. 1' streaks of marc mineral con-
centratlon. Slight petroleum odor, ang~lar grains,
no visible stain.
12.0-13.5' 12.0-12.3' Sand, tan, med-coarse gl-am, poorly 100 121 10:02
sorted, abundant mafics & mica, strong petroleum
odor, no visible stain; 12.3-13.5, sand, alter-
naling bands of yellow to dark grey, medium-very
coarse grains, abundant mafics, petroleum odor,
no visible stain.
13.5-15.0' 13.5~14.0' Sand, tan, meal-coarse grain ,pebbles 100 134 10:05
to .05', poorly sorted, strong petroleum odor, no
visible stain; 14.0'-15.0' Sand as at 12.3'
with .1' pebble bed at 14.6' (chert -black, and
granite pebbles), strong petroleum odor, no
visible stain.
15.0-16.5' 15.0'-15.5' Sand, llne-med grain, poorly sorted, 100 200 lB 15.0- 10:14
abundant maflcs & mica, petroleum odor, no 15.5'
visible stain; 15.5-16.5 sand as at 12.3,
strong petroleum odor, no visible stain. .
16.5-18.0' '16.5'-17.2' Sand, as @ 13.5', no pebbles, strong 100 146 10:21
petroleum odor, no visible stains; 17.2'-18.0'
Sand, as @ 12.3', strong petroleum odor
Brian Hlrst
Description by:
,Geotechnlcal AssOCiates. Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bake~fleld Boring Designation: 8oil Bo~g #1
PGA Job Number'. COBOO1 Date: 1~'/4/89 Page: _~ of _~
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth Uthologlc Description (%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hrs)
18.0-20.5' 20.0'-20.5' Sand, reed-coarse, grey-tan, poorly 100 63 lC 20.0- 10:53
sorted, petroleum odor, no visible stah~s 20.5
° 18.0'-20.0' . 1' brown-grey plastic Clay' @ 18.1',
sand as aboye, decreasing odor with depth.
20.5-25.5' 20.5'-24.8' Sand as above, decreasing stain; 70 57 1D 25.0- 11:15
24.8'-25.1' Sand, fine grain & clay, gr~ to 25.5
brown; 25.0'-25.5' Sand, coarse-medium, poor
sorting grading to Sand, tan, fine-medium grain,
poorly sorted, slight petroleum odor.
25.5-27.5' . 25.5'-27.0' Sand, tan, . coarse grained, poorly 100 94 11:29
sorted, micateous; 27.0'-27.5' Sand, fine-med
grain, to. 1' from bottom get pebbles/cobbles.
27.5-28.5' Cobbles
Stopped at 27.5' due to rocks
28.5-29.0' Drilled ahead to 29, sample at 30.0'.
29.0-34.0' Lost 2.0' 60 7 1E 30.0 12:06
29.0'-30.8' Conglomerate, pebbles to .2', poorly 30.5
sorted, rounded gra~tic clasts throughout,
strong petroleum odor; 30.8'-31.0' Clay, brown,
plastic,silty, slight petroleum odor; 31L.0'-32.0'
Sand, grey, med-coarse grain, no odor' or stain;
32.0'-34.0' No recovery {we used a five foot
sampler for this sample)
32.0'-34.0' No recovery
34.0-46.0' 34.0'-46.0' No recovery, no sampling due to
cobbles.
46.0-48.0' Sand, reed- coarse, light tan, poorly sox~ed, no 100 .6 1F 13:00
petroleum odor.
48.0-50.0' Sand, same as above 100 .3
Brian Hirst
Description by:
c Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
!
Property Owner:City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: Number 2
Site Address: 2101 H St Fire Station Number I Date: 12/4/89 Page: I of ;~
Location of Boring: Gas Teak Site Elevation:
Drilling Contractor', Melton Drillin{~ PGA Personnel: Randy Metz Karl Fuqua
Driller: Randy Walton Rig Type: Mobile DdIl B-53 Total Depth: 2,2.0 Ft
OVA Detector Type: TEI 580 PGA Job Number: COB001
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth Uthologic Description (%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hrs)
0.0-8.5' ~ on top-Sand, brown, medium-coarse grain 14:45
8.5'-10.0' Sand, grey, medium-coarse grain, strong petrol-
eum odor
10.0'-12.0' 10.5'-11.0' Sand, fine-medium grain, occasional 75 2 2A 10.5'- 14:45
coarse grain, dark brown, occasional red brick 1 !.0'
fragments, poorly sorted, petroleum odor;
11.0'-11.5 Sand, medium-coarse grain, grey-
brown, micaceous poorly sorted, petroleum odor;
11.5'-12.0' Sand,as above, coarsening with depth
12.0'-14.0' 12.0'-12.5' Sand, as above; 12.5-12.75 Sand, 100 2 14:55
fine grain, silty, firm, stight petroleum odor;
12.75'-14.0' Sand, fine-medium grain, e.ccas-
iop~_11y coarse, micaceous, tan, no odor
14.0'-16.0' 14.0'-15.0' Sand, fine-medium, occasionally 75 1 2B 15.0'- 14:57
coarse, tan, no odor 15.0'-15.5' Sand, flne-med 15.5'
grain, occasionally coarse, micaceous, lll~t tan,
poorly sorted, no odor; 15.5'-16.0' Sand,
medium-coarse grain, occasional maflcs,, poorly
sorted, no odor.
16.0'-18.0' 16.0'-16.3' Sand, fine-medium grain, light brown, 100 2 15:05
very slight odor; 16.3'-16.6' Sand, medium-
coarse grain, very silty, white, firm, lool~
weathered; 16.6'-18.0' Sand, coarse, occasional
pebbles to. 1', moderate sorting, tan, no odor
18.0'-20.0' 18.0'-19.4' Sand, as above; 19.4'-19.6' Clay, i 15:10
micaceous, grey with reddish silt; 19.6'-19.7'
Sand, fine-medium, occasion~t coarse grain silty,
dark brown, no odor. Dropped .3' out of top
Kevin Beacom
Description by:
,Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: ~oil Boring #2
PGA JobNumber: COBO01 Date: 12/4/89 Page: 2 of 2
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth I.ithologlc Description (%) (ppm) Design. Depth [24 hrs)
20,0'-22.0' 20.0'-20.5' Sand, fine-coarse grain, grey-.brown, 100 1 2C 20.0'- 15:45
poorly sorted, occasionally pebbly, no Gdor 20.5'
20.5'-21.0' Sand, as above with greeni,,~h brown
clay inclusion .05' thick; 21.0'-22.0' Sand,
fine-coarse grain, grey-white color, pre¢[omtnent
medium grain size, no odor
¢
Kevin Beacom
Description by:
otechnical Associates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: Soil Boring #8
Site Address: 2101 H St Fire Station #1 Date: 12/4/89 Page: I of _.2
Location of Boring: Diesel Tank Site Elevation:
Drilling Contractor.. Melton Drilling PGA Personnel: Kevin Beacom Karl Fuqua
Driller: Randy Walton Rig Type: Mobile Rig B-53 Total Depth: 36.0 Ft -
OVA Detector Type: TEl: 580 PGA Job Number: COBOO1
Rec, OVA Lab, Sample Time
Depth Lithologic Description (%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hfs)
0.0'-5.0' Fill above
5.0'-7.0' Fill above; 5.0'-5.5' No recovery; 5.5'-6.0' Sand 75 0.0 3A 5.5'- 15:55
fine grain, very silty, brown, micaceous, no odor; 6.0'
6.0'-6.2' as above; 6.2'-7.0' Sand, fine-medium
grain, silty, occasionally coarse, tan, mJlcaceous,
no odor
7.0'-9.0' 7.0'-7.6' Sand, fine-coarse grain, light brown, no 100 .8
odor; 7.6'-7.8' Sand, fine-medium grain, silty
occasio~_lly coarse, grey-white, finn, looks
weathered, no odor; 7.8'-9.0' Sand, medium-
coarse grain, micaceous, salt & pepper appear-
ance, orange-pink rock fragments.
9.0'-11.0' 9.0'-10.0' Sand, fine-medium grain, tan, occasion- 80 .8 3B 10.0'- 16:10
ally pebbly, rmcaceous; 10.0'-10.5' Sand, fine- 10.5'
medium grain, occasionally coarse, tan~ mica-
ceous fining downward, no odor; 10.5'-11.0'
Sand fine-medium grain, buff, firm in spots, looks
weathered, no odor
11.0'-13.0' 11.0'-13.0' Sand, medium-coarse, poorly sorted; 100 1.0 16:15
11.9'-12.1' Sand, as above, but includes weath-
ered fine or white sand
13.0'-15.0' 13.0'-14.0' Sand, fine-coarse, occasional pebble to 3.0 16:20
.05' light brown, no odor; 14.3'-15.0' Sand, fine-
medium grain, silty, light brown, micaceous, no
odor
15.0'-17.0' 15.0'-15.5' Sand, fine-medium grain, brown, 85 74.0 3C 15.5'- 16:25
micaceous, no odor; 15.5'-16.0' @ 15.5' Sand, 16.0'
as above; @ 16.0' Sand, fine-medium, silty, grey
-white, no odor; 16.0'-16.3' Sand, fine-coarse
grain, tan, mecaceous, no odor; 16.3'-16.65'
Sand, fine-coarse, rusty brown, micaceous ·
16.65'-17.0' No recovery
Kevin Beacom
Description by:
,Geotechnlcal Associates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield
PGA Job Number: COBO01
Depth Llthologic Description
17.0'-19.0' 17.0'-18.5' Sand, 'medium-coarse grained,
brown, occasional pebbles to .05', becomm
red with depth, no odor: 18.5'-19.0' No
19.0'-21.0'
21.0'-23.0'
23.0'-25.0'
25.0'-27.0'
27.0'-29.5'
29.5'-35.5'
35.5'-36.0'
Boring Designation:: Soil Boring #3
Date: 12/4/89 Page: ;[. of 2~..
Rea. OVA Lab. Sample Time
(%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hfs)
[, silty, 75 43 16:35
ntng more
) recovery
d, 25 35 3D 20.5'- 16:35
sional 21.0'
) odor
mca- 37 16:45
silty,
mca- 75 16:50
dark
~d, as
~bbles
t/Ti, mica-
:overy 100 1 3E 26.5'- 10:05
ma, 27.0'
te as
.28.5' 75 1 11:00
glomerate
no odor;
in,
along
~l'ln
lty, tan, 100 i 3F 35.5'- 11:19
36.0'
19.0'-20.5' No recovery; 20.5'-21.0' Sand
medium-coarse grain, dark brown, occl
pebbles, dark brown silty clay clasts, no
21.0'-22.4' Clayey silt, dark brown, very
ceous; 22.4'-23.0' Sand, very fine-fine
grey-brown, mlcaceous, no odor
23.0'-24.0' Sand, very fine, dark brown,
ceous, occasional iron stain, occasion~[
brown silty clay clasts; 24.0'-24.2' Sand
above with coarse grains & abundant;
to .2'; 24.2'-24.3' Clayey silt, dark brown
ceous, no odor; 24.3'-25.0' No recover
25.0'-26.0° Drilled, no description, no
26.0'-26.5' Sand, very coarse, reddish
pebbly, no odor; 26.5'-27.0' Sand, Same
above
27.0'-28.0' Drilled, no description;
Same as above; 28.5'-28.8' Pebble co=
subangular to subrounded grains, tan,no
28.8'-29.5' Sand, coarse-very coarse,
pebbly, pebbles less than or equal to. 1'
axis, massive
29.5'-35.5' Drilled through cobbles. 13-.
size, Well rounded
35.5'-36.0' Sand, coarse grain, slightly Si[lty,
pebbly, no odor
Description by: Randy Metz
,Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Property Owner: Clt~ of Bakersfield Boring Designation: Sell Boring #4
Site Address: 2101 H St ~ Station #1 Date: 12/5/89 Page: 1 o£ 2
Location of Boring: 30' EeJt of Bo~l~g #1 Elevation:
Drilling Contractor: Melton D~llt.g PGA Personnel: l~mdy Metz Karl Fuqua
Driller: I~w'm Wl~te Rig Type. Mobile ]~g B-53 Total Depth: 22.5 Ft
OVA Detector Type: TEI 580 PGA Job Number: COBO01
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth Uthologic Description ' (%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hfs)
Drilled, asphalt @ surface -
5.0'-7.0' 5.0'-5.5' No recovery; 5.5'-7.0 Sand, lkne-med- 75 ,3 4A 6.5'- 12:10
lum grained, grey-tan, slightly pebbly, no odor 7.0'
7.0'-9.0' 7.0'-7.7' Sand, line-medium grain, tan-brown, 100 .5
slightly pebbly, no odor; 7.7'-7.9' Sand, coarse
gram, 'slightly silty, grey, very pebbly, pebble
less than or equal to .05'; 7.9'-8.4' Sand, fine
gram, slightly silty with abundant coarse grained
rocks, tan, no odor; 8.4'-8.55' Sand, fine grain,
dark mieaeeous bands (varvs), no odor; 8.55'-
8.7' Pebbly conglomerate with abundm~t coarse
grained sand, pebbles less than or equal to .05',
no odor; 8.7'-9.0' Sand, fine grain, tan, abundant
coarse grained rocks, slightly silty, no odor
9.0'-11.0' 9.0'-9.5' No recovery; 9.5'-10.0' Sand, medium- 75 .00 4B 10.0'- 13:25
coarse grain, tan, pebbly, slightly silty with clay 10.5'
pebbles, no odor; 10.0'-11.0' Sand, fine grain,
silty, grey-tan, pebbly, grading to sand-medium
gram, pebbly, slightly silty
11.0'-13.0' 11.0'-11.6' Sand, coarse grain, tan, slightly 100 1.0 13:35
pebbly, no odor; 11.6'-11.95' Sand, lh~e-
medium grain, grey-tan, slightly silty; 11.95'-
13.0' Sand, coarse grain, tan, with thin varvs of
dark maflc mineral, no odor
13.0'-15.0' 13.0'-14.25' Sand, coarse grained, tan, slightly 100 1.2 13:52
pebbly, no odor; 14.25'-14.5' Sand, flne-med
ium grain, tan, slightly silty, occasional coarse
grain rocks grading down to: 14.50'-15.0' Sand
line grained, tan-grey, slightly silty, no odor
15.0'-17.0' 15.0'-16.25' No recovery, 16.25'-16.5' S~d, 36 1.0 4C 16.5'- 14:10
coarse grained, tan, slightly pebbly, no odor; 17.0'
16.5'-17.0' Sand, same as above, grading to clay
In catcher, Clay, white-tan
Description by: Randy Metz
/"'""'"'"'-'-~C ,Geotechnical ASSOCiates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: 8otl Boring #¢
PGA Job Number: COaO01 Date: 1:3/5/89 Page: 2 of 3
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth LltholOglC Description (%] (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hrs]
17.0'-18.5' 17.0'-17.5' Sand, medinm-coarse grained, tan, 100 1 14:12
slightly pebbly, grading down to; 17.5'-18.0'
Sand, medium grain, tan slightly pebbly;
18.0'-18.5' Sand, fine-medium grain,
pebbly, with pebbles to. lft,' no odor thxoughout
sample
18.5'-20.5' 18.5'-20.0' No recovery; 20.0'-20.5' Sand, 33 1 4D 20.0'- 14:25
as @ 18.0'-18.5' 20.5'
20.5'-22.5' 20.5'-20.7' As above; 20.7'-21.0' Sfltstone, 100 i 14:30
slightly mlcaceous, slightly sandy, brown
21.0'-21.2' Sand, very fine grain, very silty,
brown, slightly micaceous; 21.2'-21.3' Sand,
very coarse grain, tan, sflty,m pebbly; 21.3'-
21.5' As @ 21.0'-21.2'; 21.5'-22.5' Sand,
fine grain, tan with grey mottling, slightly mica- ·
ceous, no odor
Description by: Randy Metz
Geotechnlcal A~oclates, Inc.
Property Owner: City of Bakersfield Boring Designation: Soil Boring #5
Site Address: 2101 H St Fire Station #1 Date: 12/18/89 Page: I of 1
Location of Boring: 7.5 Ft N45°W From Borin~ 2 * Elevation:
Drilling Contractor: * Dlrecti°"Ally drilled at 210 N4.5°W PGA Personnel: RA-dy Metz
Driller: Rig Type: Hand Auger Total Depth: 14.6'
OVA Detector Type: 580A OVM PGA Job Number: COBO01
Rec. OVA Lab. Sample Time
Depth Lithologic Description (%) (ppm) Design. Depth (24 hrs)
0.0'-4.5' Fill Sand and Silt 0.2
4.5'-4.7' Clay, grey, silty, no odor or stain 0.2
4.7'-6.2' Sand, medium -coarse grain, silty, broom, no odor 0.4
or stain
6.2'-9.8' Sand, medium-coarse grain, tan, micaceous, no 0.4
odor or stain, grades downward into; .Sand,
coarse grained, Lan, micaceous, pebbly, no odor
or stain
9.8'-11.3' $and, coarse grain, tan, pebbly, no odor or stain 0.6. 5A ~).8'-! 1.3
11.3'-11.8' Sand, fine-medium grain, tan, slightly silty, slightly 0.5
pebbly, no odor or stain
11.8'-14.0' Sand, medium-coarse grain, tan, pebbly, micaceous 0.3
no odor or stain
14.0'-14.6' Sand, medium-coarse grained, tan, pebbly, slightly 0.3 5B 14.0" -
silty, no odor or stain 14.6"
................................. i .................... ~ : .....................
Description by: Randy Metz
APPENDIX C
Laboratory Results
SMC
Analytical Chemistry
Client Name:Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Address :4664 American Ave.
Bakersfield, Ca. 93309
Date samples received :12-04-89
Date analysis completed:12-13-89
Date of report :12-18-89
Laboratory No.3346 through 3360
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3346 ID:lA Ugm/gm
Benzene .24
Toluene .10
Ethylbenzene .26
p-Xylene .38
m-Xylene .34
o-Xylene .16
Isopropylbenzene .82
TPH (Gasoline) 19
TPH (Diesel)
1100-
#3347 ID:lB ugm/gm
Benzene .40
Toluene .35'
Ethylbenzene 1.9
p-Xylene 3.6
m-Xylene '2.7
orXylene 2.1
Isopropylbenzene 6.2
TPH (Gasoline) Il0
MDL,ugm/gm
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
10
MDL, ugm/gm 0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
1 0
TPH (Diesel) 10,000 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
3155 Pegasus Drive
P.O. Box 80835 ·
· Bakersfield, CA 93308
Bakersfield, CA 93380' ·
(805) 393-3597
FAX (805) 393-3623
Laboratory No.334m through 3360
RESULTS O~ ANALYSIS
~3348 ID:lC ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene .31 0.1
Toluene .25 0.1
Ethylbenzene 1.2 0.1
p-Xylene 2.5 0.1
m-Xylene 1.8 0.1
o-Xylene 1.3 0.1
Isopropylbenzene 7.1 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) 64 1.0
TPH (Diesel) 6800 10
'B3349 ID:iD ugm/'gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0.1
Toluene ND 0.1
Ethylbenzene ND 0.1
p-Xylene ND 0.1
m-Xylene ND 0.1
o-Xylene ND 0.1
Isopropylbenzene hid 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0
TPH (Diesel
10
Method of Analysis for 8TX/TPH (Gasoline): 38'10/8020
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FI~)
Mf>L = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/'gm = micrograms per gram
ND =. Not detected
(FZD)
Laboratory No.3346 through 3360
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
ID:IE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
p-Xylene
mrXyiene
o-Xylene
Isopropylbenzene.
TPH (Gasoline)
u gini gm
21
12
40
1 1
1 4
72
1.6
75
MDL, u gm/'gm
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
TPH (Diesel') 1100 10
ID:iF u.gm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene - ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
Ot
O1
O1
O1
Oi
10
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
Method of Analysis for 8TX/TPH (Gasoline):.3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/'gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Com
i_aborator,/' No.3346 through 3360
RESULTS OF ~NALYSIS
ID:2A ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene .47 O. 1
Toluene 2.6 O. 1
Ethylbenzene 3.1 0.1
p-Xylene 13 O. 1
m-Xylene 2!3 O. 1
o-Xylene 2.5 O. 1
Isopropylbenzene 6.2 O. 1
TPH (Gasoline) 1200 1.0
TPH (Diesel) FID 10
ID:28 ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0.1
Toluene ND O.l
Eth¥1benzene ND 0.1
p-Xylene ND O.l
m-XYlene ND
o-Xvlene ND 0.1
Isoprop~'lbenzene ND 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) ND l.O
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
~ie~hod of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
kiethod of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 5540~8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons '~
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
Laboratory No.~46 through
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
~5554 ID:2C
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Isopropylbenzene
TPH (Gasoline)
TPH (Diesel)
u gm/gm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
10
i0
~3555 ID:SA
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Isopropylbenzene
TPH (Gasoline)
TPH Dlesel)
ugrn/gm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
Ot
O1
O1
O1
Ol
O1
10
N'D 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis fcc TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH z Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
u~m/gm = micrograms per 9ram
ND = Not detected
Laboratory No.5346' through 5560
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
ID:3B ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene iqD
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
Oi
1.0
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
ID:3C ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene. ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (.Gasoline) ND
TPH (~iesel) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
10
ID:SD ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene FID
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH ('Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
Ol
O1
lO
TPH (Diesel') ND 10
Mebhod of Analysis for BTX/TPH .(Gasoline): 5810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 '(FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
Laboratory ' No . 5346 through 356(3
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
ID:Equipment Blank ugm/L
Benzene 6.4
Toluene 57
Ethylbenzene 8.5
p-Xylene 21
m-Xylene ,60
o-Xylene .14
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH ('Gasoline) 460
MOL,ugm/L
0.5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
50
TPM (Diesel') ND 100
~3360 ID:Travel Blank ugm/L
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
E thylbenzene ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
TPH (Diesel
MDL,ugm/L
0.5
05
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
50
ND 100
Method of Analysis for 8TX/TPH (Gasoline : 5050/8020
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 5510/80'20 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum HydrocarDons
ugm/L = micrograms per liter
ND = Not detected
SMC Laboratory
Analyticai Chemistry
Client Name: Pacific Geotechnicai Associates, Inc.
Address : 4664 American Avenue
Bakersfield, Ca. 93309
Date Samples Received :12-05-89
Date Analysis Completed:12-13-89
Date of Report :12-16-89
Laboratory No.3369 through .3377
Project Name: Fire Station #1
Project : COB 001
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3369 ID:3E ~ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0.1
Toluene ND 0.1
Ethylbenzene ND 0.1
p-Xylene ND 0.1
m-Xylene ND 0.1
o-Xylene ND 0.1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0
TPH (Diesel) '
ND
10
#3370 ID:3F ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene -' ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
10
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH !Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL'= Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
Laboratory No~3369 through 3377
Pro3ect Name: Fire Station #1
Pro3ect : COB 001
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3371 ID:4A ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0,1
Toluene ND 0.1
Ethylbenzene ND ,0.1
p-Xylene ND 0.1
m-Xylene ND 0.1
o-Xylene ND 0.1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0,1
TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0
TPH (Diesel)
ND 10
~3372 ID:4B ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0.1
Toluene ND 0.1
Ethylbenzene ND 0.1
prXylene ND 0.1
m-Xylene ND 0.1
o-Xylene ND 0.1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Laboratory No.3369 through 3377
Project Name: Fire Station.il
Project : COB 001
BESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3373 ID:4C ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
01
01
01
01
01
01
0.1
1.0
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
#3374 ID:4D 'ugm/gm MDL,ugm/gm
Benzene ND 0.1
Toluene ND 0.1
Ethylbenzene ND 0.1
p-Xylene ND 0.1
m-Xylene ND 0.1
o-Xylene ND 0.1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.1
TPH (Gasoline) ND 1.0
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of' Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Laboratory No.3369 through 3377
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3375 ID:Equipment Blank
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Isopropylbenzene
TPH (Gasoline)
TPH (Diesel)
#3376 ID:Equipment Blank
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
p-Xyiene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Isopropylbenzene
TPH (Gasoline)
ugm/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND,
240
ND
ugm/L
.58
ND
.51
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MDL,ugm/L
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
50
lO0
MDL, ugm/L.
0.5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
50
TPH (Diesel) ND 100
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasolinei: 5030/8020
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3510/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/L = micrograms per liter
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
SMC
Analytical .Chemistry
Client Name:Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Address :4664 American Avenue
Bakersfield, Ca. 93309
Date Samples Received :12-18-89
Date analysis completed:12-28-89
Date of report :12-29-89
Laboratory No.3621 and 3622
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#3621 ID:8-A ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
#3622 ID:5-B ugm/gm
Benzene ND
Toluene ND
Ethylbenzene ND
p-Xylene ND
m-Xylene ND
o-Xylene ND
Isopropylbenzene ND
TPH (Gasoline) ND
MDL,ugm/gm
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
O1
TPH (Diesel) ND 10
Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 3810/8020 (FID)
Method of Analysis for TPH (Diesel): 3540/8020 (FID)
MDL = Minimum Detection Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
.ND = Not detected
Stan Comer
3155 Pegasus Drive
P.O. Box 80835 ·
· Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
APPENDIX D
Chain of Custody Documents
hnical CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Associates,
Inc.
4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 * (805) 832-7490
~ P,~/. of__
~-~------ f CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
/
4664 American Avenue o Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 * (805) 832-7490
Page of
Gf CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
eoteChnical AssoCiates, Inc.
4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 * (805) 832-7490
Pago of __
~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (805)832-7490 ~
Page __ of
hnical Associates, Inc.
4664 American Avenue. ** Bakersfield, Calif. 93309
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
· (805) 832-7490
Page of
DIST~ ~/hlle,~,Al~mlx:~, Yego~lo~b, Plrk lol:'C~
Specialist :'? .,~..
Environmental Health 580 ;~1'~-~120 (7187)
Funding (Local, State, or F~eral) ..... ~ ................
I IOescripti~ of Activity
ICat.
Activity
Date ICode Code .
Notes
" ..,..l(.10's)
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTIN6 SHEET
...... ~- ~ ........ ~ ...................
~,o,,,~ ,,,,,, 0~ ~,.,~ ...... ~~ .............. ~ ....
)Cat. IActivity
Oate ICode ICode
Notes
IOescription of Activity
(.lO's)
By .......... ; ........... j_Date '
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (12/88)
.. ': - - ~ i ~ . · /[ ' '/ KERN~COUN~ HEALTH
." ':'::~, ':"" ':' '-)" ':~:' : -"::':~: '} : .;. ': '~.'' Oi,ision of Environmental Health ~;;".,f~:. ".,:~: ,:'..?:.~.::,. _
~' ~rvlce Request .~~ Complaint · CT No. ~slgned to:
"~' : ":" ":'" '<~" '"" "-'"'" ..... '~'" :"' '"" ~'~:~:'
~ ~atlon City '
~l~tlO.~ ,~ ~ ,,i ....
, ,,~,~ ~~ ~~, .~. ..
~ ,~ I ~ -
Complainant notifled
of results__ Investigated by / ~ &~-~
Date -
KCHO 560 2760 372-EH (R.Z1-80)
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUN1FING SHEET
Permit II__J_~_Q(3_(~ .... EmploYee Name & Number___~_D_O__L~.O_~__E_.~ ..... ~Z~)_(J,_C~-~_J
Site Name or Add.ess___~.~'~Jd___~'~_.~:__:___:~_.~_.L ....
E'~i'~ '~,~'~'j,_Z~j~L~,~_~___:_::,:_::_~'~ ' ~ ' ~' .....
Funding (Local, State, or Federal) ........... ~_ .....................
Date ICode ICode mOescription of Activity
I Notes
_~__.___~,~_~__~__. ...........................................................................................................
.... _c_~___~_ .... _~___~__~_____.~ .... ,_'._~ .... ~__c~ .... ~¢~___~ ..... ~_~___~_'__J..
Oata Entered By Date
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (12/88)
site Naae o. AddreSs___ __~__~_~.L~/_____F;_'C~___~_~_____-_____5~_.~__~_/____
Employee Signature ~0/~,~,
Funding (Local, State, on Fedepal) ........ __~_ ........................
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TINE ACCOU}ITING SHEET
ICat.
IActivity
I
IHouns
JDescciption of Activity
Date JCode ICode )(.lO's)
Notes
..... __J~____P.__~____~___~__~___ .z~___~__. .... _~ .... ,_,___,_.__,___,_,_____,___,___-- .... .~ ......
_ ._~___~_z~ ~_ ____~_ __ _~___ L__~____~ ~ ~__ ____~___.___ _~ .... ~ ~___~_~,_' ~_~__~.~___ __~___ ..........
_~__~___j~___~_~___~___'~____~____~ .... _~_:~___~_~ .... ~~ .... __~_~ .... _J____.~___~ ........
Bate Entened By Date
Specific T~me'Accounting Sheet
Notes:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 Rev. 5/89)
Permit' # ..... .' I~'¢0'1~ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ~
Site Name or Address ~-'~n; ~'~T~.~.,
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
:Date c~eegOry Act±v±ty ,. Hours
Code Description (lOths)
'Notes:
' n., - ) t' ,2. ~;., vh ,-'P-', >--~--. '~'.:.~i'_ :'/ .... ¢'~"F-.:. ~-~'",
..... ~.'z <, ':N r.-.. ~:(3:. ~,,,.,~.~.~ v~.
Data Entered By: · Date:
Employee
Site Name or Address
eegOry Activity Hours
~* , (lOths) .f ~
Date Code Description ~ .: : . ~ '
A,,, -...,,.: -, ,~. ~.~ ~-:~?' . ~. ~.-.
4::, .?.. ~... t.~ p>~.. ,:~, r¥, ~./~ ,--t 't.A ~'~. , ~. ~ ~.~.~-~x~ ~.
i , , , t q · , -.. ,,
Env. Health 580. 4113 1~37 (Rev, 5~89) .
.' 'PHONED
I ~METO
":' SEE~OU.
~o~ ~~'~~~/~-~,~~ ..".,':-""
~-~ ,'.,.~~~ ~~~ '-~.: ..~.:...
~o~ .~,..~'~,~ -~~ ~,-~.., . ..... ,l~'~h~: . .................
...... . ( ':' ~t~:~::
~,.~o ? ~ ~o~ .... ~X~J:~
Site Specific T~me Accounting Sheet ' ,. ',,'--.:. >.:.~:.?> :?~?~?:~?:.:~>~? ~?::.:
Employee Signature D ~0 ~k
Site Name or Address ~'r~. ~L~. ~ ~
Code Description
Date .
I?!,? / I-:-.:~ ~ /~ m...~ .. ~' ~.....-,.~.3
Site Specific Status Changes: "'-.'i. '[ ::..: "-:iii~ '-:' 'z .......
Data Entered By: Date:
Employee #
Employee Signature p~~ ' "~"-' ? ....... ;'-,%"
Cat_ egory Activity Hours
Date
Code-
Code Description ( lOths
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89)
Site Specific Tim~ Accounting Sheet
'Permit #
/6 00/~
EmPloyee
q
Site Specific
CONTRACT O~L~ONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet -.'. '-
Permit # f~ ~ {9 · ': Site 'Specific 'Status -Changes:
Employee #
Employee Signature ~ ~ ~
Site Name or Aaa~ss_~ ~ ~,~
Funding (Local, (State: of Federal)
Date ~:x~eegO~ Activity Hours
Code Description ( 10tbs
~' /~ ~ J
~ ~ter~ By: ~te:
Data Entered By:
Date: -
Ac ,~iv:Zy"
Cz, ia : Eescri9~ion
Da~a Entered By:
Date:
¢
~ta En=ered BY: Date:
Dat..a Ea~.'t:e.red By': Da'Ce:
'l
~~ TA~
Sit.= Specific Time Accozuuc~n~ Sheet
Sits Specific Status ~ha~:gas:
': 'i ~=ego~ Ac=ivi~ ~o~s
Date Code Code Description ( 10t~hs )
~ ~ter~ By: ~te:
Env. Plealtt~ 580 411:3 137 (Rev. 5/89)
CONTPACT O-~.IONS FOR ~%I{!~ ?~/%~<S
Slue Specific T~e Accoumuing Sheet
SiZe Specific Sta~s ~ha~es:
Date Code DescriPtion (10ths)
IEnv. Hea[tt~ 580 ~,113 137 (Rev. 5/89)
·
I= Cat, egory Activity "'Hours
!Date uoae Code Description (lOths)
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Healtn 580 4113 137(Rev.§/89)
Entered
Hours
(lOths). '.
~te:
Env. Health 580 4113
COUNTY OF I(ERN
· ' Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Streei,' 'Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636 ' .
· Number
(805) 861.3429 Fnx
CLOSURE PERMTT NUMBER A912-16
PERMANENT ·
PERMIT FOR
OF UNDERGROUND HAZAR
Bakersfield, CA .(93301 :::'.~:~'~[,:"Bakersfie]d, .:CA .:.:93301 ,-~[:~[~,:~-Bakersfie/d, L[CA ;:j;93307
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF
Phone:(805)326-3724 ._ ._ iPhone:(805) 834-110'0
· ..... :...: ~,~:.!~f:...;-.. ....
PERMIT EXPIRES July'24~ ::1989 ':' '"'" ' '':""~' "'~ ' '~
! .TANK(S)
LOCATION
AT ABOVE
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
an Starkey ~
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
':.
-- 2.
A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or inerting and
filling) to arrange for required inspections(s) '
Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action.'
Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health
Department and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook
#UT-30.
PERMIT FOR PEP~MANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A912-16
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents '..to "be
sampled for which are described below and in HandboOk ~UT-~0 must receive
prior approval by the Environmental Health Department. ' ~' '. ': '.:-'--': ....
' " ' · el..' ' · ~- - '
5. If any contractors or disposal facilities o~her than thos~-~-~d 6n
. .~:::~..and permit application are to be :=tilized, prior approval must be granted
6. So i 1 Sampl ing( piping area ) ":' ~' ~Y.' ": '. ' '" :'<':: .:' :,.:' ~,:l?'::?<;' :~F?'~:?~:-~:: :,':" ': ??.:?%::~:::/:":::":,?,:~:F::.'
a minimum of two samples must be :retrieved at depths of approximately two
fee~ and six fee~ for every. 1~ linear feet of pipe run and also near the
7. Sample analysts ....... ' .... ', · :, -:~ ..... . .... ~.
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene,
toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons.
Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil.
10.
11.
Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
Advise this office of' the time and date of the proposed 'sampling with 24
hours advance notice.
12.
Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis.,
completion. ~
ACCEPTED
..... DS:cas
\A912-16
4-21-07
DATE
WATER RESOURES'CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT
"~-::~:~:~"~:::CONTRACTOR NO:~:~_-15000 ..:.~._'SOURCE OF FUNDS:'S ..-SUBSTANCE:-:12034
SITE NO:
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
160013
FEDERAL EXEMPT: N PETROLEUM: Y
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPT., STAT I DATE REPORTED: 03/I3/89
2101 "H" STREET
DATE CONFIRMED: 03/13/89
.............. ':-'"-- .... "CITY/ZIP: ....... :-BAKERSFIELD, CA 9:3301 '- ...... ' ..... ' ...... CATEGORY: ....
SITE STATUS
CAsE TYPE: S
CONTRACT STATUS: 5
RP SEARCH: S
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT: C
REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION: U
REMEDIAL ACTION:
POST REMEDIAL
ACTION MONITORING
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
TAKEN:
RAP REQUIRED:
CASE CLOSED:
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED:
DATE UNDERWAY: 03/13/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 03/13/89
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
EMERGENCY
RESPONSE:
DATE COMPLETED: 03/13/89
DATE COMPLETED: 11/27/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 11/28/89 DATE COMPLETED:
DATE UNDERWAY: ~ //l/~O DATE COMPLETED: ~/~/~0
DATE UNDERWAY: DATE COMPLETED:
TYPE: DATE TAKEN:
RALPH HEUY
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
2130 "G" STREET
DATE APPROVED:
DATE CLOSED:
REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN:-
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
SPECIALIST: 9
SENSITIVITY: NES
VERIFIED (X)
............................ CITY/STATE~: ........... BAKERSFIELD,-*CA 93301 ..... DATE OF REPORT: _12/18/89 ......
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861.3636
Telecopier (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
March 5, 1990
Ralph Huey
Hazardous. Materi.als Diwision ..... _.~_
City of Bakersfield
2310 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Subject:
Underground Tank Site Characterization
Report, Fire Station #1, 2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit No.: 160013
Dear Mr. Huey:
We have completed our review of the site characterization report prepared by
Pacific Geotechnical Associates for the subject site. The report presented the
following information:
Gasoline contamination (1200 ppm TPH) was identified to a depth less
than 15 feet below the gasoline tank site. The lateral extent was
estimated to be 8 feet in qiameter.
e
Gasoline and diesel contamination was found below the diesel tank site.
The contamination plume extends down to about 32 feet with a diameter
of approximately 18 feet.
Three remedial action options were discussed. Pacific Geotechnical
Associates recommended the "no action" option. This option will
include raising the tank sites at least 6 inches and bordering the site
with cement/brick to prevent surface runoff. The surface will not be
covered with an impermeable material.
This Department is satisfied that the extent of contamination had been
defined. Regarding the remedial action proposed, the "no action" option is
acceptable for the gasoline tank site. On the diesel tank site, we require capping
the site with an impermeable material since diesel was identified at lower depths
° and at higher levels.
Ralph Huey ·
March 5, 1990
Page 2
Regardless of the remediation alternative chose, a statement indicating which
alternative will be used shall be submitted to this office within 30 days from the
date of this letter. Should the "no action" alternative be selected, please be
aware that approval of this alternative is based on current regulatory requirements
and may not exempt you from future liabilityr
~' ...... If you haveanyquestions'-regarding-thi~s matter~,please, call me at (805) 861-
3636.
Si ncerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous; Materi al s Speci al i st
Hazardous Materials Management Program
'DG: c as
cc: Randall Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates
\160013.1tr
GARY J. WICKS
. Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
2700 M Street. Suite 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
'' .. ..... rl ..... Telephone (805) 861-3636
,.!.'.;,,,g?~"~-. Telecopler (805) 861-3429
.
D E PA RT~[F, '~-'F,~. J.~.. N M E NTA L
November 29, 1989
Ralph Huey
Hazardous Materials Division
City of Bakersfield
-'~-'~2310 "G"'.Street ........ - .................. ~-.~---
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Subject:
Underground Tank Site Characterization,
Fire Station #1, 2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit #: 160013
Dear Mr. Huey:
The site characterization workplan (including addendum) prepared by Pacific
Geotechnical and Associates for the subject site has been reviewed by this
Department. The proposal is approved and can be implemented as written. Should
the full extent of contamination not adequately defined by this phase of the
investigation, an addendum to this workplan must be submitted to this Department
for approval.
Please notify this office 48 hours prior to implementation of the workplan.
After all samples have been' retrieved and analyzed, a report describing the full
extent of contamination must be submitted to this office within 30 days. This
report must also discuss the remediation alternatives appropriate for this site per
Kern County Handbook UT-35 guidelines.
If you should have any question.<', regarding this matter, please call me at
i80 ) 861-3636.
S i ncerel y,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materi al s Speci al i st
,Hazardous Materials Managemen. t Program
DG:cas
cc: Randall T. Metz, Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
.............. khuey, ltr
0
._o §
o
o
Ms. Delores Gough
Environmental Health Serv
Kern County
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Pacific Ge°technical Associates, Inc.
! 4664 Amedcan Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (80~) 832-74~K}
Ms. Delores G°ugh
Environmental _. Health
Kern County
2700 "M' Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Gough:
93301
November 27, 1989
This letter is in response to 'yoUr telephone inquiry~:Iast week-:i:egarding ....... " ......
our site characterization work plan for the contaminated site at Fire Station No. 1 in
Bakersfield. The work plan is amended as follows:
add Section 2.8 Destruction of Borings
Drill cuttings not preserved for laboratory analysis will be sealed in 55
gallons drums and temporarily stored at the site. The borings will be filled
with cement to the surface when drilling operations are completed.
amend
Section 2.3.1 as follows (change shown in bold print):
1) Boring will cease ten feet below in soil boring #1 and
and five feet below in all other borings the first soil
sample which has a measured value of less than five parts per
million (5 ppm) volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's) on a field
Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA), &nd when the soil sample at total depth
meets the same field screening criteria;
We are aware that we need a permit to complete a monitor well and'will
contact you immediately after the decision is made to do so.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Sincerely,
Randall T. Metz, R.G.
CC:
R. Huey
Hazardous Materials Div.
City of Bakersfield
~hnical As.~ociates, Inc.
4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield, Calif. 93309 · (805) 832-7490
Ms~ 'D¢10rcs oouglx ......
Environmental Health Services
Kern County
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
November 13, 1989
Dear Ms'. Gough:
Attached for your review is 'the Site Characterization Work Plan
for Fire Station No. 1, City of Bakersfield.
If you approve the plan, or if you have any questions, please
call me at the telephone number shown above.
Respectfully,
Randall T. Metz, R.G.
November 13, 1989
Site Characterization
Work Plan
~FIRE STATION NO. 1
City of Bakersfield
Submitted to:
rn County Environmental Health
Department
4664 Ame~lcan Avenue · Bake~fletd. Callf. 93309 · (B05)832-74~0
LO INTRODU~ON
Site History
The city of Bakersfield owns property at 2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield.
Fire Station #1, offices of the City's Hazardous Materials Division of the Fire
Department and several small storage buildings are located on this property.
In March of 1989 a 550 gallon underground diesel fuel tank was
removed from the site after records indicated it had lost 400 to 500 gallons of fuel over
a three day period in February of 1989. The location of this tank and laboratory
analysis of a soil sample collected two feet below the tank (see Appendix A) are
presented in Figure 1.
Subsequently, a 550 galllon underground gasoline fuel tank was removed
at the site in May of 1989 having failed a pressure test within the last year. No
significant fuel loss had been noted for this tank from from inventory reconcilia-
tion. However, laboratory analysis at two and six feet below the tank (see Figure 1
and Appendix A) indicated leakage had occurred.
Dispensers were located immediately adjacent to both tanks. Therefore,
all sources of product are confined ~to the tank sites. As prescribed in handbook UT-
35 of the Kern County Environmental Health (KCEH) Hazardous Materials Manage-
ment program, a characterization stUdy is required for this site. The following work
plan describes how the vertical and lateral extent of this contamination will be
investigated.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. · Bakersfield
Fire Station
No. 1
Fire
Administration
2 Feet
6 Feet
Sample S-2
B/T/X/E/TPH ugm/gm
ND/.39/12.44/.24/13.07
ND/.54/10.49/.17/11.20
B/T/X/E/TPH ugm/gm
3.5/3.7/15.1/2.6/630
Diesel Fuel Storage Tank
Storage
550 Gallon Underground
Gasoline Storage Tank
Storage
H Street
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Figure 1.
City of Bakersfield
Fire Station No. 1
Location map showing tank sites and laboratory
analysis of grab samples.
BFIH 10/89 I I'
Approximate Scale (ft)
0 10 20 30 40
I I I I I
I
1.2 Consultants and Contractors
11/13/89
Page 2
The City of Bakersfield has contracted Pacific Geotechnieal Consultants,
Inc. (PGA) to conduct site characterization studies at the 2101 "H" Street site. PGA has
........... prepared bis .work plan .and will ..conduct site characterization work and~ prepare the
report. Melton Drill3ing Company and SMC Laboratories of Bakersfield will be con-
.tracted by PGA to preform the drilling and analytical phases of site characterization.
Statement of Non-Interest
...................... 'Neithcr-'VGA-'n:°r 'it's 'e~aPl0Yees are employed by, have fiduciarY:' inve~t-'
merits or long term contracts with the City of Bakersfield. Our only vested interest'
with the City is that. which is common to residents and property owners of
Bakersfield.
1.4 Time Frame
Work will began on site characterization within ten days of approval of
this work plan providing contractor av~tilability, weather, etc., permit. A report of
findings including recommendations for remediation will be submitted to the KCEHD
within six weeks of completing the soil sampling, work.
2.0 SOIl, SAMPLING PROGRAM
2.1 Introduction
The :following program is designed to assess the vertical and horizontal
extent of contamination in the Soil for the diesel and gasoline underground' tank
sites. The program consists of a minimum of four soil borings provided contamina-
tion is not laterally extensive and perched groundwater is not involved. However, as
many as ten soil borings will be considered if product is encountered on ground-
water. If necessary, three of these soJ. l borings will be completed, as monitoring
wells.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. · BakerSfield
Figure 2 sho~ : .....
are numbered in the order i
be used to determine how n
1) Soil borings ~1 ~ "' '-' " "' ::~ '." : ...... ~ -..
contamination . ,c ..
Soil borings g3 l. '.".: .::-, ..... '~; ..... - '
"' .... ~ Cha~:~e~fi~tion' ~ill not be' 'n~cessa~."~
~3) If contamination is indicated to extend beyond ei~er soil bo~ngs
~en ~;oil bo~ng g5 will be d~lled. The'exact location of ~is bo~ng will
depend on ~e levels of contamination indicated in previous bo~ngs.~
4) If soil bo~ng ~5 indicates cont~ination, ~en one or both of soil bo~ngs
~6 ~d ~7 will be d~lled[ depending on ~e indicated source of
contamination.
5) If 'product is found on groundwater in soil bo~ngs gl and/or g2, ~cn as
many aS ten total soil bo]~ngs will bc d~llcd. Thc location of these
borings will be selected to dete~ine thc extent of contamination in
three directions from ~e source (Fi~r~ 2). In addition, ~ree soil
bofing:s (~1, ~2 and ~10~ will bc completed as monitoring wells.
2.3 Depths of Soil ]:;orings
The depth of each soil boring will be determined in the field using
either of the following criteria:
1)
Boring will cease five feet below the first soil sample which has a
measured value of less than five pans per million (5 ppm)Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC's) on a field Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA),
and when the soil sample at total depth meets the same field screening
criteria;
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. · Bakersfield
Fire Station
No. 1
Fire
Administ?ation
GASOLINE TANK SITE (~)
DIESEL TANK SITE
StOrage
Storage
(if needed)
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Figure 2.
City of Bakersfield
Fire Station No. 1
Proposed location of soil borings.
BMH,l~89 I
H Street
(~) Soil Boring Location
Approximate Scale (ft)
0 10 20 30
I I I I
I
2)-
11/13/89
. Page 4-
If perched ground water is encountered before the above criteria are met,
boring will cease three feet below the depth ground water is first
encountered.
2.4 Monitoring Wells
If contamination is found, on ground water at either the gasoline or
diesel tank sites, three monitoring wells will be installed. The exact construction of
the monitoring wells will be subject to findings during drilling of the soil borings.
The soil borings will be completed with flush threaded schedule 40 PVC pipe. The
-:completion interval Will :~0nsist' "of~ gr~w~l 'Packed, "'flush threaded' schedule 40 PVC
liner with 0.020-inch manufactured slots. A three foot bentonite annular Seal will be
placed above the slotted liner. Cement grout will be placed around casing from the
annular seal to the surface. The completion interval will be 15 feet, half of which
will extend below the water table and half above.
A four-inch (4") diameter completion will be made if the well is
considered to be a potential remediation candidate. Otherwise, a two-inch (2") well
completion will be made. The completion interval in soil boring //2 may be extended
to within five feet of the surface to allow for alternative remediation options at the
gasoline tank site.
2.5 Sampling Procedures
Soil borings will be drilled using a hollow-stem auger. The augers will
be steam cleaned at the beginning of work and between each soil boring. Soil
samples will be retrieved using a split.-spoon sampler and brass tubes.
Soil samples will be taken for laboratory analysis at five foot intervals.
Analysis will include benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene (BTXE) using EPA
method 8020 and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) using EPA methods 3810/8020
and 3510/8020. Laboratory sampling of': soil borings will begin at five feet with the
exceptions of soil borings #1 and #2 which will begin at ten feet.
If groundwater is encountered, a water sample will be taken prior to
destroying the boring or completing the boring as a monitoring well.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. · Bakersfield
11/13/89
Page 5
A continuous lithologic description of soils will be made for each
boring. The, shoe of each core barrel with sample retrieval will be field screened
with an OVA for VOC%.'
2.6 Quality Assur_ance/Quality Control
Soil Samples for laboratory analysis will be collected in brass tubes.
After the ends of the sample tubes have been examined for lithology and any visible
staining, they will be covered with a Teflon seal and secured with plastic caps. The
core will then be marked and placed i:a an ice Chest which will maintain the
.... "~: ......... ~cm'l~er~ture at, or below,~4° C~ ~At the' end~6f"the day-they Will be transported to-.SMC ~-
Laboratories of Bakersfield.
Trip blanks will be obtained from the laboratory each morning and will
accompany the samples. At the end o:~ each day of soil boring, an equipment blank
will be collected from sampling equipment which has been cleaned using normal
procedures.
The split-spoon sampler and brass tubes will be washed in TSP and
rinsed with distilled water between sa~aples and steam cleaned between wells. Should
water samples be collected, a Teflon bailer will be employed. It will be washed with
TSP and rinsed with distilled water bellween wells. Chain-of-Custody forms will be
completed when'the sample is collected and maintained with each transfer of the
sample.
2.7 Health and Safety
Personnel involved in site characterization field work will comply with
Level D protection (boots, hard hats, eye protection). This will be augmented by
wearing Neoprene gloves when handlting samples and sampling equipment.
Fire Station gl located at the site will be used for communication and
first aid should an accident or emergency occur. The site will be flagged off to
control public access, and all personne]i and visitors to the site will sign the site log
book each day.
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. · Bake~fleld
3.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
11/13/89
Page 6
The final site characterization report will include, but not be limited to
the following:
A brief discussion of the problem.
A discussion of the findings from the site characterization.
a. Vertical and lateral extend to contamination plume. Plan and
Vertical Cross Section views of contamination plume.
b. Results and interpretation of all analyses.
e-.' - DescriPtion' of geology and' 6blUmnar Section 'for' 'each :soil -boring-
showing soil type.
d. Description of hydrogeology (if applicable).
e. Monitoring well diagrams (if applicable).
Remedial Action Options
a. Presentation of at least two options plus a "no action" alternative.
b. Description, feasibilit,y study, and cost analyses.
c. A summary of expected concentrations of contaminants after
remediation.
d. An evaluation of the need for monitoring wells and analyses during
or after remediation.
e. A risk appraisal for each alternative.
Ground Water Investigation Results (if applicable)
a. Vertical and horizontal extend of ground water contamination.
b. Depth and extend of floating product found.
c. Contaminated ground water gradient and regional ground water
gradient' based on recent data.
d. Ground water analyses.
e. Pertinent aquifer information.
Ground Water Remediation ,Options
Respectfully submitted:
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. * Bakersfield
11/13/89
Page 7
APPENDIX
PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ,, Bakersfield
Laboratory
Analytical Chemistry
-[
.!
........... Bakers-f ield,.- _ CA
Client Name: Groundwater Resources, Inc.
Address : 5S10 District Blvd., Suite
93313
'__ ~ .'2: ....... --~'" f --
Date samples received : 3-03-89
Date ~nalysis completed: 3-08-89
Date of report : 3-08-89
Laboratory No. 872
-.project No.:-:..TSOIg .... --:
Purchase Order No. 2274
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
~572
ID: S-2 ugm/Em MRL,uKm/Em
Benzene 3.5 0.!
Toluene 3.7
Eth~lbenzene 2.5 0.1
m-~ylene 6.8 0.I
o-X¥iene 2.8 0.1
isogroDylbenzene ND 0.1
TPH (Diesel) 6,300
Method of AnalTsis: Californim DOHS LUFT manual
MRL = Minimum Repor~:in~ Level
TPH = To~al Petroleum Hydrocarbons
u~m/Em = micrograms per $r~m
ND = No~ detected
tan Comer
3155 Peg~us Drive · B,%kers,'ieid. C.A 93308 - (805) 393-3597
P.O. BOX 80835 . Bak=s6~cL CA 93380 ~". FAX (805) 393-3623
"~.~,~'~-,.~. ~..~F" . J.J. EGLIN. ~*G. O,IE~. 8NGa.
Petroleum Hydrccarbonz
McNabb Cona~-~-tion
7808 Olco~ .Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
.~ A~on: ~/~ ~1~
~ No.: 3~64-I
~le ~c.: Ci~; o~ ~~elci
......... : ......... -;~ - ........ - ................. 2!~ & '~" St. 2'
cor.r.w. CTED: RE~ · [.~: EXTRa~:
04-]~'-89 04-,Yz%~-89 .09-u~n~-89
Repoz-cir~ Anal~is
Dar~ of
Repor~: I5-~y-89
DATE ANALYSIS
Benzene ug/g None Detec'-~d 0.02
Toluane ug/g 0.39 'O. 02
E~i ~e ' ~g 0.24 0.02
~Xylene ~ 2.40 0.02
~l~l~ ~g 5.80 0.02
~l~ne ~g 4.2A O. 02
pe~._~-oleum
I~zdrocarbonm ug/g None
Tot,~3. Pe~: .....
Hydrocarbons . u&/g 13.07
500.00
0.02
TEST ~l/40D: Californ_ta State D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Diesel
(Carbo~Di.~tLfid~.-ac~ion)
Comnenta: Sample e.xhibit~ gasoline c,hr~mato~--aphic fingerprint
e~oLine 1~: 2,~5.91
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDRCC~NS:
on this
Californi~ D.O.H.S. C, er~. #102
total of all con~ituan~
....... Ro'oe_---t. Plaisance Chemis~
7808 Olc~ Ave.
Bakersfield, ~ 93308
.Lab No.: 3264-2
5am~leDesc.:
City of ~ker=fiel.d
DATE. SA[~LE DATE SA~r_,E DATE SAM~.~ DATE ANALYSIS
COLr.~_~: RECEIVED (~ LAB: EXTRACI'ED:
04~89 04.-~ay.-89 09-~ay'-89
Pe~z~leum
Totml Pe~.
N~ne Det~---~ed 750. O0
ii. 20 O. 02
TEST ~IOD: California Stat~ D.O.H.S.
(Carbon DidOeS. de Ex,race, on)
T.P.H. for Diesel
Sample ~xhibit~ gasoliae ~romatographic finger~rin~
c-~soline TPH: 257.77 ~Jg
PETROLatUM knf~RCC.%iEBONS: Quantification of ~etroleum hydrocarbons
u~lizing a diesel stan~.~d. As outlined by. the C~l~ornia D.O.H.S.
These petroleum :~drocarbons are in ~a~tion to the cormtituents
TOTAL PETRO~ RYDRCC~CNS: The m~ total of a. I1 co~aenr~
on t. hia
California D.O.H.$. Cez~. ~102
...................... · '"' J'~ J.-E~jIin .......... ' ............. Robe.-~ Plaisanc~
C'aemis~
FIRE DEPARTMENT
O. S. NEEOHAM
............. FIRE-CHIEF '
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
2101 H STREET
BAKERSFIELD, 93301
· -' .... --"- ' - - -' :' =--': ..... · ........ %-~- :: 926,39'i'~2-.:7_
August 16,1989
Dolores G~ugh
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Kern County Environmental Health,
27'00 M Street ............ ~- '
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Dear Ms. G~ugh:
Enclosed please find a CODY of the proposal from Pacific
Geotechnical Associates for the site assessment at 2101H Street.
Of the proposals received from our RFP for this site assessment,
we believe this proposal best fits our needs. Please review this
proposal to determine their qualifications, as well as, the
technical completeness of the proposal.
I would appreciate any effort you could make to comDiete this
review in a timely manner. I am working toward a deadline to get
this on a counsel agenda this week. Please contact me by phone at
326-3979 with any comments you may have.
Thank you in advance.
S¢~9~erely yours, ·
.,..'Ralph E.
/' Hazardous Materials Coordinator
REH/ed
1989
, Pc
Pacific Geotechnicai Associat.es,
.-:.Jnc .... -::. [. --. :.._, :..4664 American_~Avenue Bakersfie d. Cal~.: ,w._(_805) 832-74~3
August 9, 1989
Technical Proposal and Price Quote
Site Characterization
FIRE STAII'ION NO. 1
City of Bakersfield
Submitted to:
City of Bakersfield
Geotechnicai Associates,
/~ ' ' ! · 4664 American Avenue · Bakersfield. Calif.
· (805) 832-7490 '
August 9, 1989
In Reply to Request for Proposal:
Site Contamination Characterization.
Fi~ Station No. 1, 2101 "H" Street
.......... Mr.'Ralph Hue~y- ........... "." .............. -' - .... --: .........................
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
City of Bakersfield
2310 "G" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
Dear Mr. Huey:
On behalf of Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc., I am pleased to submit to
you two (2) copies of our technical and business proposal "Site Characterization, Fire
Station No. 1, City of Bakersfield."
The primary_ price quote asszunes eight soil borings to thirty feet. Because of
the geologic and hydrologic setting at the claaracterization site, there is a possibility we
may fred contamination floating on perched ~und water. If this is the case, we
recommend a more thorough characterization~ which will include completing and
developing up to three wells for water sampling and water gradient determination. These
wells may also be used for remediafion.
The contingency price quote i:s for the scenario where product is floating on
ground water. It assumes nine soil borings ~md that the City of Bakersfield will choose the
option to complete three wells as monitor/remediafion wells.
As its name describes, the primary llZi.~qUote is Pacific Geotechnical
Associates, rnc.'s principal bid for the Fire Station No. I site characterization. If ground
water is involved, the contingency price quol:e will apply. We will only know if ground
water is involved after the first boring is made.
We believe our proposal describes a thorough, yet cost effective solution to
your need to characterize the soil contaminate, on at Fire Station No. I in the scope
described in the city's Request for Proposal.
We believe that our work plan will receive prompt approval from the regulatory
agencies involved. It will also .supply adequate information'for you to make an informed
decision about remediation alternatives.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (805) 832-
7490.
Sincerely,
Randall T. M{~tz, R.G~~'-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Site Characterization
Fire S:mtion No. 1
2101 "H" Street
City of Bakersfield
......... : !7£~ _..: · -- ~ .
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ' 1
2.0 'WHY THE CITY OF BAKERSFIKLD SHOUI. D SI~.F. cr PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL
.. ASSOC ATF. S, crrY CO] ORATION YARD P OmCr ........ 2
' ........... .......... -~'--'3-:0 '~7-INICAL PROPOSAL ...... - ....... :-" .......... ' ":'::"-': ........................ - ................................................. ':'-' ':::'
3.1 PREPARATION OF srrE CHARACTE:RFZATION PLAN ............... · 3
3.2 FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
3.2.5
3.2.6
Locations of Soil Boriags ............................. 3
Depths of Soil Boriags ............................... 4
Optional monitoring Wells ........................... 5
Sampling Procedures .................. ~ .............. 5
Quality. AssurancedQuality ContrOl ..................... 6
Health md Safety .................................... 6
3.3 ' SELECTION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES ................. 6
3.4 FINAL SITE CHARACrERrZATION REPORT ........................ 7
4.0 PROJECr MANAGEMENT
4.1 ORGANIZATION .............................................. 8
4.2 TIME SCHEDUI~ ............................................... 8
5.0 COST QUOTATIONS .................................................... 9
6.0 QUALIFICATIONS
6.1 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC ......................... 1 2
6.2 PAC]I;'IC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOC~,TES, INC. EMPLOYEES ............. 1 2
6.3 POTENTIAL SUBCONTRACTORS ................................... 1 3
Figure 1. Fire Station No. 1 Plot Plan showing soil boring locations.
Figure 2. Proposed project time schedule.
APPENDIX A. KEY PEOPLE STATEMENTS O:F QUALIFICATIONS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Following'an announcement in The Bakersfield... Californian, Pacific
Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (PGA) asqui~d_a. Request for Proposal to perform a site
:---': characterization~~f Soil contamination at the Fire Station No.1, ~2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield.
Services requested by the City include professional environmental
cons. ulting, preparation and implementation of site characterization work plan, final site
characterization report and remedial action ;malysis. The plan, report and analysis must
"-: ...... ~" "- ...... meet the .-requ{rements of~ theKern Cotinty Health Dep'anment's Waste i-~Managemen~t'"~-~
Division as outlined in its handbook UT-35.
These services are within the expertise of Pacific Geotechnical Associates,
and we are pleased to submit this bid for consideration. The bid is organized as follows:
· SECTION 1:
· SECTION 2:
· SECTION 3:
· SECTION 4:
· SECTION 5:
· SECTION 6:
Introduction and Background
Why Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Is the Best
Consultaat for This Project.
Technical Proposal.
Project Management and Time Schcdule
Cost Quotation
Qualifications
The background information used in assembling this quote Was provided by
the City of Bakersfield in the Request for ]Proposal. A 550 gallon diesel fuel underground
tank (Site A, Figure 1) lost between 400 and 500 gallons of fuel before removal. Soil
samples taken from beneath the tanks showed high concentrations of diesel contamination.
Another 550 gallons underground gasoline tank (Site B, Figure 1) was also removed. No
leakage from the tanks' was indicated by in.vento~ records.
The Request for Proposal indicates this site may be an environmentally
sensitive area due to perched ground water. Because of the site's proximity to the Kern
River, and because perched ground water is indicated in this area on a recent Kern County
Water Agency depth to perched ground water map (KCWA Water Supply Report, 1987),
....... We anticipate the possibility that ~erched-ground-'water maf-b~' enc°u-n/~re~L
2.0 WHY ~ CITY OF BAKERSFn~ 5) SHOULD Slur
PACIJ::IC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE FIRE :STATION NO. 1 PROJECT
....................... Pacific Geotechnical Associates, .Inc., a. recently formed company, is ...... :.: ...... - ........ :-. .............
committed to establishing a tradition of quality and service, here we outline the strengths
which qualify us as the best consulting firm fOr this project.
INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE -- Employees of PGA have 37 years of combined geological,
cnvironmental, tcaching and managcmcnt cxp(:ricncc. Wc have becn actively consulting
--:"--for 'l~arge and reputable companies here in B~kersfield.
LOCAL KNOWLEDGE - PGA employees have acquired most of thc expertise locally. This
experience has resulted in published papers on the geology of the San loaquin Valley.
Employees have also lectured before professional society meetings and led field trips.
HIGHLY MOTIVATED -- We are highly motivated to serve our clients. Every client is our
"Most Important Client," and every job our "Most Important .Job." Our commitment to
excellence is enhanced by our maturity and professional experience.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT -- PGA managem:nt has several years of professional
management experience. We have directed projects as simple as ·drilling one well and as
complex as forecasting an annual departmental budget of millions of dollars. We are
keenly aware of the importance of cost and scheduling to you project.
B.0 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
3.1 PREPARATION OF SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN
........... ..Z'~-'-_'~';i ..... 7_ "JZ .... "ZL-~-JZ'.;--.'.'" -'~i'i'_ -'Z '-".-i~--'TZZ'Z' ._Z 'Z. 7-__Z'u"ZF':i-'L'~Z-.'z-'J.z.'-Z _ :7"5 £11_i:' ~,: :.'.i---,.~.?-'--'i~U-~': -('~'::~-zt--::; ~' ~~~"£ ...... Li ...... :....
A site characterization work plan similar to that described below will be
submitted to the City of Bakersfield for comment and then to the Kern County Health
Department (KCHD), Waste Management DMsion, for approval.
3.2 FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM
· L The folk~Wing plan will effect a complete, but efficient, soil contamination
assessment of underground tank sites A and B located 2101 "H" Street.
The potential for contamination on perched ground water at the site raises
the possibility for installation of three mc,nitori~ig/remediation wells during the site
characterization program. This approach is optional at the City of Bakersfield's discretion,
however if product is found on ground water, remediation plans will depend on the
information these monitoring wells provide. Should an in sim remediation plan be
adopted, these wells could be utilized for vapor or fluid recovery and as fluid level wells.
If perched ground water is not encountered, then the soil borings outlined
below will be sufficient for site assessment.
3.2.1 Locations of Soil Borings
Eight (8) soil borings are prol?osed for site assessment of Sites A and B as
shown in Figure 1. They will be drilled itt the numerical order indicated.
.Soil borings #1 and #2 will investigate the vertical extend of contamination
at Sites A and B. Soil boring #3 will be thc first boring to determine the horizontal extend
of contamination at Site A. It will be located approximately ten to fifteen feet north of the
Site A tank excavation depending on the nature and extent of contamination observed in
soil boring #1. If no appreciable decrease in contamination is shown in soil boring #3
when. compared to soil boring #1, then another soil boring .(#3A) positioned ten to fifteen
feet northwestward toward Site B will be drilled.. The results of these borings will
determine the exact placement of soil borings #4 and #5.
Similar logic and procedure will be employed with soil boring #6 at Site B.
-zT-:-':'--'~-::--:::The rational-of this. plan is to assure that if additional soil borings" are'deemed'necessat3t .....
to adequately define the l~teral extent of contamination, these borings will bridge the gap
between the two sites, thus maximizing th~, usefulness of the data obtained.
Optional soil boring #9 would be drilled providing there is product on
-.-..-.-..::-...--::~-:perched gr°ug-d-.,w.a.t?[_~t Sit.c A_gr ~B _and the...Ci~._0~f ]~akersfielct chooses, to instan .................. ' ....
monitoring wells in soil borings #1 and ~2. during site assessment.
If product is found on ground water at either site, installation of three
monitoring wells will permit measurement of the water table, recharge capacity of the
aquifer, and water quality, all essential to development of a cost effective remediation
'plan and required by the guidelines found in Handbook UT-3$.
3.2.2 Depths of Soil Borings
The depth of each soil boring; will be determined in the field using either of
the following criteria:
1) Boring will cease five fee't below the first soil sample which has a
2)
measured value of less than five parts per million (5 ppm)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's) on a field .Organic.. Va.p. or
Analyzer (OVA), and fwhen the soil sample at total depth meets
ag criteria; ........
If perched ground water is encountered before the above criteria are
met, boring will cease three feet below thc depth ground water is
first encountered.
..
3.2.3 Option'al Monitoring Wells
If contamination is found on ground water at Site A or B, the City of
Bakersfield may elect to install monitoring 'wells during site characterization. PGA
..... -: ' :5 -- '-~-- recommends three monitoring wells- be installed .in. soil borings/ti,. #2.and _#9..:: ::~:~-:~.~-_.:_::~-~ .... ' '
The exact construction of the monitoring wells will be subject to f'mdings
during drilling of the soil borings. We recommend completion of the soil borings with
flush" threaded schedule 40 PVC pipe. The completion interval will consist of gravel
.packed, flush threaded schedule 40 PVC lin,er ~with 0.020-inch manufactured slots. A
three foot bentonite annular seal will be placed above the slotted liner. Cement grout will
be placed around casing from the annular s~.'al to the surface.
A four-inch (4") diameter well completion will be recommended for soil
boring locations #1 and g'2, and a two-inch (2") well completion for soil boring #9. The
completion interval in soil boring g2 may be extended to within five feet of thc surface to
allow for alternative remcdiation options at Site B.
3.2.4 Sampling Procedures
Soil borings will be drilled using a hollow-stem auger.
steam cleaned at the beginning of work and between each soil boring.
retrieved using a split-spoon sampler and brass tubes.
The augers will be
Soil samples will be
Soil samples will be taken for laboratory analysis at five foot intervals.
Analysis will include benzene, toluene, xyle=~¢ and ethylbenzene (BTXE) using EPA method
8020 and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) using methods approved by the California
Department of Health Services. Laboratory ,~;ampling of soil borings will begin at five feet
with the exceptions of soil borings #1 and #2 which will begin at ten feet.
A continuous lithologic description of soils will be made for each boring.
shoe of each core barrel with sample retrieva~l will be field screened with and OVA for
VOCs.
The
3.2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Soil samples for laboratory analysis will be collected in brass tubes. After
the ends of the sample tubes have been examined for lithology and any visible staining,
-..~_-~ ........ they_~will be covered with a Teflon seal-and secured with plastic caps.
be marked and placed in an ice chest which, will maintain the temperature at, or below, 4
C. At thc end of the day they will be transported to SMC Laboratories of Bakersfield.
Trip blanks will be obtained lfrom the laboratory each morning and will
.... .--_~:.._--: ~c_o_mpany. the .samples... At the end of~ .~ach_day of soil boring and equipment blank will
be collected from sampling equipment which has been cleaned using normal procedures.
The split-spoon sampler and brass tubes will be washed in TSP and rinsed
with distilled water between samples and steam cleaned between wells. Should water
samples be collected a Teflon bailer will be employed. It will be washed with TSP and
rinsed with distilled water between wells. Chain-of-Custody forms will be completed
when the sample is collected and maintained with each transfer of the sample.
3.2.6 Health and Safety
Personnel involved in site characterization field work will comply with Level
D protection (boots, hard hats, eye protection). This will be augmented by wearing
Neoprene gloves when handling samples artd sampling equipment.
The location of the nearest available telephone will be brought to the
attention of all personnel on site. A list of emergency telephone numbers will be posted at
the site.
All personnel and visitors to the site will sign the site log book each day.
3.3 SELECTION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Development of suitable remediation alternative will depend on the results
and quality of the site characterization. Pacific Geoteclmical Associates, Inc. is able to
develop remediation programs to handle th~: anticipated contamination_ .at _these _sites.
Alternatives may include disposal, bioremediation, soil venting, chemical treatment,
pumping, an~i "no ' '"
action. It is possible that some rcmediation plans will be rudimentary
and suitable to the use of City personnel and machinery for implementation. All
remcdiation plans will be reviewed with the City of Bakersfield before being submitted to
thc appropriate regulatory agency.
.......... . ' ........... 7-' ' ........................ ~ ......... . _ ' ~ '~'2~ .~_~ ...... 7'--'-..
3.4 FIN~ SiTE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
.~. The final site. characterization report will include, but not be limited to the
0
folldwing:
1. A brief discussion of the problem.
A discussion of the findings from the site characterization
a. Vertical and lateral extend to contamination plume.
Cross Section views of contamination plume.
Plan and Vertical
b. Results and interpretation of all analyses.
c. Description of geology. Colamnar section for each soil boring showing soil
type.
d. Description of hydrogeology (if applicable).
e. Monitoring well diagrams (if applicable).
3. Remedial Action Options
a. Presentation of at least two options plus a "no action" alternative.
b. Description, feasibility study, and cost analyses.
c. A summary bf expected concentrations of contaminants after remediation.
d. An evaluation of the need for monitoring wells and analyses during or
after remediation.
e. A risk appraisal for each alternative.
4. Ground water Investigation Resul:~s (if applicable)
a. Vertical and horizontal ex~cnd of ground water contamination.
b. Depth and extend of floating product found.
c. Contaminated ground water gradient and regional ground water gradient
based on recent data.
d. Ground water analyses.
e. Pertinent aquifer information.
5. Ground Water Remediation Options (if applicable).
.... ._ .... _Submittal of the final report 1[o the appropriate regulatory agencies will
follow a draft report review and approval by the City of Bakersfield.
4.0 PROJECt MANAGEMENT
4.1 ORGANIZATION
Thc City of Bakersfield Fire Sllafion No. 1 projcc.t will be directed by PGA CEO
Randall T. Metz, an experienced manager of geologists.
Non-contract field work will be performed by a field team supervised by
Brian M..Hir_st, ..a~._ cxpc~cn..ced.~ge0_10gi~st: ..Enyir0nmental and soil sampling._wi'!!~be
performed by the field team, soil boring wRl be handled by Melton Drilling, an
experienced drilling contractor. Sample analyses will be conducted by SMC Labor~ories, a
full service chemical laboratory certified by' the Department of Health Services.
PGA values the health and safety of its personnel. As a matter of company
policy we always prepare a site-specific He~lth and Safety Plan for each pl~ject. Due to
the limited scope of this project, Mr. Hirst will serve as Quality Assurance/Safety Officer. ~'~
4.2 TIME SCI-II~UI.E
The Request for Proposal specifies that work will begin ten working days
after notice of award from the City of Bakersfield, and will continue until all work is
completed. PGA is prepared to start as soen as a contract can be executed between the
City and Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc: We expect this to be about mid-August,
1989.
5.0 COST QUOTATION
The primary price qu0t~ is Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.'s principal bid
.. ........... :.--for the site contamination characterization at-the Fire Station No. 1 .
In the event that ground water is involved in the site characterization, PGA
recommends a more rigorous work plan which involves boring extra wells and completing
up tO three wells as monitor/remediation wells. The q0ntingency price quote is PGA's
business proposal if ground water is affected.
It will not be known if ground', water is involved until the first boring is
made, and any agreements must reflect this contingency.
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Project: 'Site Characterization
Fire Station No. 1
2101 "H" Street
Augu;;t 9, 1989
...... Pri-ar-'P'~-'~m y rice Quote '
Assumes eight soil borings, to thirty feet
Non-Labor Costs
: 1) Drilling, concrete cutting charges (@ $375 x 8) ................ $ 3,000.00
2) Steam Cleaner (@ $115/day x 2) ' $ 230.00
3) Brass soil core liners (@ $10 x 10) ............................ $ 100.00
':~" ..... : ............ ' ....... 4)" Photoionizati0n Detector rental-'(@ $100/daY 'X-2
, 5) Laboratory Charges - 10 day turnaround
Minimum of 44 soil samples (5/well plus ~;p and
equipment blanks, 2/day)
(EPA8020 for BTXE and EPA 418.1 for TPH),
(@ $65 x 44) '$ 2,860.00
Non-Labor Subtotal
$ 6,390.00
Labor
Registered Geologist
Site Charactcrization Work Plan, Rcmcdiation
Feasibility Study, Final Report 16 hfs @ $75 / hr..' ........... $1,200.00
Geologist
Drilling Supereision, vapor monitoring, sample
description. 12 hrs @ $65 /hr .............. $780.00
Jr. Environmental Tech
Sampling 12 hfs @ $35 / hr .............. $420.00
Project Management 4. has @ $75 / hr. .............. $300.00
Administrative 4. hfs @ $25 / hr .............. $100.00
Sab Total, Labor Costs
$2,800.00
Grand Total Primary Price Quote $ 9,190.00
10.
Pacific Geotechnicai Associates, Inc.
Project: Site Characterization
Fire Station No. 1
2101 "H" Street
August 9, 1989
COntingency Price Quot6
Assumes nine soil borings to thirty ~:et, option to completed and
developed three wells as monitoring/remediation well. s.
Non-Labor Costs
............ .. ...... _.,. 1) Drilling, concrete cutting charges (@ .$375 x 6)~. _,_~;~_~...... ~ .._ ~.... ~ ,._..~_~_, .. $ 2,250.00
2) 'Steam Cleaner (@ $115/day x 3) ...... ' ...................... : .' '$ "345.00
3) Brass soil core liners (@ $10 x 10) ............................ $ 100.00
4) Photoionization Detector rental @ $100/day x 3 day ........... $ 300.00
5) Laboratory Charges - 10 day turuaround
Minimum of 51 soil samples (5/well plus trip and
equipment blanks, 2/day)
(EPA8020 for BTXE and EPA 418.1 for TPH),
(@ $65 x 51) ............................... ' ........... $ 3,315.00
Minimum/Maximum of 6 water samples (2/monitor
well). (EPA 8020 for BTXE), $65,
(TPH diesel), $30. = $95. x 6 ............................. $
570.00
6) Monitor/Remediation Wells, 3 wells @ $1,400/well ............ $ 4,200.00
Non-Labor Subtotal
$11,080.00
Labor
'Registered Geologist
Site Characterization Work Plan, Remediation
Feasibility Study, Final Report 16 hrs @ $75 / hr ............. $1,200.00
Geologist
Drilling Supervision, vapor monitoring, sample
description. 16. his @ $65 / hr ............... $1,040.00
Jr. Environmental Tech
Sampling 16 hfs @ $35 /hr ............. $560.00
Project Management 5 ;~'s @ $75 / hr. .............. $375.00
Administrative 4 i~s @ $25 / hr .............. $100.00
Sub Total Labor Costs
$3,275.00
Contingency Price Quote $14,355.00
lL 1.
6.0 QUALII:ICATIONS
6.1 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, I~{C.
......... :<- ............ Pacific Geotechnical'Associates:,'-Inc. is comprised-of experienced geologists ...................
and engineers consulting in Bakersfield. We currently provide services to Arco Oil & Gas;
Evans, Carey & Crozier, and San Joaquin F~ergy Consultants. Statements of qualifications
for key personnel are located in Appendix lt.
6.2 PACIFIC GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES,.INC. EMPLOYEES
Randall T. Metz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from California
State University, Long Beach, and is a candidate for a Master of Science degree in Geology
from the same institution. Mr. Metz has worked as a geologist since 1977, ultimately
serving as Tenneco Oil Company's Pacific Coast .Division's Division Geological Engineer,
where he was responsible for technical de,~elopment and supervision of nine professional
geologists as well as for budgetary and adndnistrative tasks. Mr. Metz has published
several .articles on California geology and is an active membe~r of the San Joaquin
Geological Society.
Brian M. Hirst received a Master of Science degree in Geology from Northern
Illinois University in 1976. He has worked, as both an exploration and development
geologist at Tenneco Oil Company, where he,, held the position of Project Geological Engineer
before becoming a consultant in 1988. As an environmental consultant, Mr. Hirst has
worked on federal RCWA site characterizations, clean closures of disposal sites, ground
water monitoring, and contaminated soil remediation. His expertise in California geology
led to the publication of several professional articles. He has presented papers for the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Pacific Section, and led field trips for the
San Joaquin Geological Society.
Larry C. Knauer earned a Master of Science degree in Geology from the
University of California at Los Angeles. His experience .in California includes work with
Gulf and Chevron Oil companies. Mr. Knauer serves as curator for the California Well
Sample Repository on the campus of California State University, Bakersfield, where his
duties allow him to: consult on a pm-time basis in-the environmental field. His ......................
12.
environmental experience includes contaminated site characterizations, clean closures of'
disposal sites, ground water monitoring, and contaminated soil remediation.
Mr. Metz, Mr. Hirst and Mr. Knauer are California State Registered Geologists
..... and have received .hazardous waste operations and-emergency, response~ training. ...
Kari L. FUqua holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Aquatic Biology from
Bimidji State University in Minnesota. She i.,; a candidate for a Master of Arts degree in
Biolo'gy, with an emphasis on Geology from the same institution. Her experience with the
U.S. Geological Survey is directly applicable to the requirements of this project.
6.3 POTENTIAL SUBCONTRACTORS
Drilling has b~en a contractor in the San loaquin Valley since 1968. During
· that time they have drilled over 500 borings of the type contemplated for the Fire Stations
No. 1 site characterization.
Fire Station
No. 1
" Storage
550 gallon,':
Gasoline Storage
Storage
550 gallon
Diesel Fuel Storage Tank
Fire
Administration
(if needed)
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmm! mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~
H Street
(~) Core Hole Location
i~ Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
0
Figure 1.
Clht of Bokersfleld
Fire Station No. 1
Site Characterization & Remedial Action Anal'
Approximate Scale
-10 ~12
ACliVI~
ty of Bakersfield
~wards Project
,rmal Draft of Plan and
svlew with Cily J
0
Jbmittal of Sampling
i ·
Plan to KCHD, Approval
,.
.e Characterization
rogrom .
Field Sampllfig
Analysis & J
Interpretation
afl Final Report
o Cil~, Ciht Approval I ·
~al Report to
~eg. Agencies,
\pproval
W~eks after Award
city
Site
Pacific Geotechnical Associates, Inc. Figure 2. Proposed Project Time Schedule.
Product on ground water scenario will require
the participation of additional regulatory
agencies lengthening the anticipated time
to receive approvals.
City of Bakersfield
Fire Station No. I
Site Characterization & Remedial Action Analysis
I I
Review with the City of Bakersfield
APPENDIX A. STA'rEM~qTS OF QUALIFICA~ON
Paca,c Geotechnicai
Associates,~llnc~
STATEMENT OFt, QUALIFICATIONS
RANDALL T, METZ
Education:
Bachelor of Science in Geology
California State 'UniversitY,' L0~tg 'Beach---" i'977
Post-Graduate Studies (Masters Cand.idate)
California State University, Long Beach - 1986
prgfessional Certification:
Registered Professional Geologist #3995
California Board of Geologists and Geophysists - 1985
................. Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency_ Response Training
"(29 CFR 1910.120) Williams/DiXOn and Assoc. -1989 .... ":' : ....
Recent Continuing Educatiol~ .Courses/Seminars:
Groundwater Treatment Technologies
U.C. Davis Extension, 1989
Environmental Auditing
ABAG Training Institute, 1989
Applied Bioremedial Technology
ABAG Training Institute, 198{.]
Professional I-Iistorv:
1988 to Present
1986 to 1988
1980 to 1986
1977 to 1980
President
Pa[cific Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Bakersfield, CA
Division Geological Engineer
Tenneco Oil E & P, Bakersfield, CA
Project Geological Engineer
Tenneco Oil E & P, Bakersfield, CA
Geologist
S~mta Fe Energy
Bakersfield/Santa Fe Springs, CA
Exr>erience
· Project Management
Manpower supervision
Report writing
· Soil Borings
Sampling techniques
Sample Description
· Underground Fuel Tank Removal
Sampling techniques
Sample description
Report writing
· Commerical Property Environmental Audit
Ownership transfer
Pacific Geotechnical Associa es, nc.
Statement Qf Q~l~lification. Randall T. Metz (Cont3
Publications:
"The Yowlumne Oil Field", Selected Papers: San Joaquin Geological Society, 1984
"Yowlumne - The First Ten Years", Selected Papers: San Joaquin Geol. Society, 1984
Pr0fe~ional Affiliations:
Air and Waste Management Association
San Joaquin Geological Society
Soc!ety of Economic Paleontologists and Mi.neralogists
Soc: of Prof. Well Log Analysts
_i~aCmc Geotechniical Associat~lnc(-
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
BRIAN M. HIRST
Education:
Bachelor of Science in Geology
Northern Illinois University, 1974
' ' ........· ':~' '::--- -:Master of Science 'in 'GeOlOg~ .... :--' - ::
Northern Illinois University, 1976
Pr0fe~sional Certification:
Registered Professional Geologist #4583
California Board of Geologists and Geophysists - 1989
Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response Training
(29 CFR 1910.120) Williams/Dixon and Assoc. - 1989
Professional History:
Presently
1986 to 1988
1980 to 1986
1977 to 1980
Consulting Geologist
P~;ciflc Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
Bakersfield, CA
Project Gleological Engineer
Tenneco Oil E & P, Bakersfield, CA
Project Exploration Geologist
T¢;nneco Oil E & P, Bakersfield, CA
Exploration Geologist
Gulf Oil Corp, Bakersfield, CA
R~lated Experience
· Soil Borings
Sampling techniques
Screening techniques (OVA, GC, Cyanide & H2S)
Sample description
· Installation of Monitoring Wells (Piezometers)
Confined, unconfined and fracture aquifers
Nested piezometers
Aquifer communication test
Well development procedures
· Monitoring Well Measurement and Sampling
Water and contaminate sampling
Water table measurements and reductions
water table, horizontal gradient, vertical gradient, equipotential surface
· Site Characterization, Waste Disposal Site Clean Closure
· SWAT (air and water), HAR, Soil Gas Surveys
Publications
"Early Miocene Tectonism and Associated Deposystems of the Tejon Area, Kern Co., CA.",
1988
"Tectonic Development of the and Adjacent .Areas, Kern Co., CAf, 1986
Professional Affiliations:
San Joaquin Geological Society
California .Well Sample_ Repository (Board Member)
Soc. of Prof. Well Log Analysts
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
LARRY C. KNAUER
Education:
Bachelor of Arts in Geology
Whittier College, California, 1976
-'- .... ' .... ": ........... ."Master of Science in Geology ....
University of California, Los ,~mgeles, 1982
(29 CFR 1910.I20) Williams~ixon and Assoc, 1989
Professional History:
1987 to Present
Professional Certification:
~ Registered Professional Geologist g4385
California Board of Geologists and Geophysists,
Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response Training
1987 to Present
1985 to 1986
1982 to 1985
Consulting Geologist
Bakersfield, CA
Curator
California Well Sample Repository
California State University, Bakersfield, CA
Enhanced Oil Recovery Project Geologist
Chevron Corporation, Ventura, CA
Petroleum Geologist
Gulf 0il Corp., Bakersfield, CA
Related Experienc~
· Soil Borings
Sampling techniques
Screening techniques (OVA, GC,- Cyanide & H2S)
Sample description
· Installation of Monitoring Wells (Piezometers)
Confined, unconfined aquifers
Aquifer communication test
Well development procedures
· Monitoring Well Measurement and Sampling
Water and contaminate sampling
Water table measurements and reductions
water table, horizontal gradient, vertical
gradient, equipotential surface
Site Characterization, Waste Disposal Site Clean Closure
SWAT (air and water), HAR, Soil Gas Surveys
Publications
"Geology of the Emerson Lake Quadrangle", Calif. Div; Mines 1:250,000 Geologic Map, 1982
Professional Affiliations
San Jaoquin Geological Society
California Well Sample Repository
STATEMENT ,OF QUALIFICATIONS
KARI L. FUQUA
......... Education:
Bemidji State University, MN, 1981
Master of Aris (Candidate) in Biology
Bemidji State University, MN, 1982
professional His~0ry;
1989 to Present' Environmental Technician (Consulting)
.... ., ..... - ............ ' ..... ~ ........ ...- .... ..~_Pacific Geotechnica! .~ssociates,.Inc.
1988 to Present Account Executive - AGI Publishing
Bakersfield, CA
1987 to 1987 Mosquito Abatement Technician
Kern County Mosquito Abatement, CA
1986 to Present Lieutenant J.G., .U.S. Navy Reserve
Bakersfield, CA
1984 to 1986 Assistant Surveyor
Stevenson and Associates, Walker, MN
I983 to 1984 Hydrologic Technician
U.$.Geol. SurVey, St. Paul MN
Related Experience
* Soil Borings
Sampling techniques
Sample description
Monitoring Well Measurement and Sampling
Sampling techniques
Field testing of water chemistries
Site Surveying
Survey techniques
Mapping techniques
COUNTY OF
2700 "M" Street, Suite ;300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number
Mr. Ralpk Huey
Hazardous Materials Division
City of Bakersfield
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Subject:
Location:
Known As:
Permit #:
Environmental Health Services Department
TO
ISCARD
2101 "H"
F~e Smdo~
160013
Dear Mr. Huey:
Tiffs letter is to clarify previous letters issued by this Department regarding the
investigation requirements including ovexsight costs relathtg to rite subject site.
In March, 1989, a 550-gallon underground diesel tank was removed at the site trader
Permit #A 884-16. The analytical data indicated the presence of contamination. A letter was
issued by this Department discussing the work required to characterize the site. Based on
available information, the site was identified as being located in an environmentally sensitive
area and automatically enrolled in the State Program.
In May, 1989, a 550-gallon underground gasoline tank was removed at the same site
under Permit gA 912-16. Preliminaly analytical dam also confinned the presence of
contamination at the site. In eonside~tg the presence of contamination at the second tank
removal, this Department inadvertently identified this site as being located in a non-
environmentally sensitive area. Additionsd infonnation came to light confirming the presence of
perched water in the area. This DeparUnent therefore, considers both eases as environmentally
sensitive wkieh means the oversight recovery method is through the State Program.
Mr. Ralph Huey
July 6, 1989
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this matter, pleas, e call me at (805) 861-3636.
Since:rely,
_._. ..... Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist '
Hazardous Materials Manageme~rr Program
DG:cd
dolores~huey, let
FII, E CONTENTS INVENTORY
Permit to Abandon #
Permit to Construut #
Permit to Operate #.
Application to Abandon ~--li~ Tank(s) 1
Application to Construct
Application to Operate
Amended Permit Conditions
Annual Report Forms
of Tanks
Tank Sheets
Date
Date
Date
Date
Plot Plans
Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator
Inspection. Reports ................
Correspondence - Received
Date
Corr. .
Unau
Aban
Discarded
Samp
MVF
STD
MVF Plan U~ecK {New uonstructlon)
STD Plan Check (New Construction)
MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility)
STD Plan Check (Existing Facil.ity)
".Incomplete Application" Form
Permit Application Checklist
Permit Instructions
Tightness Test Results
Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits
Date
Date
Date
Environmental Sensitivity Data:
6roundwater Drilling, Boring Logs
Location of ~ater Wells
Statement of Undergro,,~d Co~duJits
'Plot Plan Featuring A~l Env,conmen~ally Sensi~ive"Data
Photos Constructio,~ D.aw .gs Location:
Miscellaneous
2700 "M" Street,' Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861.3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number
COUNTY OF
Environmental lCleaith Servi~ ::s Department
June 22, 1989
City of Bakersfield
'ATTN: -' Mr.-JOhn'Patterson .... - ...... - -~ ........... -
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Location 2101 "H" Street, Bakersfield,
Known As Fire Station #1
PERMIT # 160013
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Patterson:
The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for work
required at the property described above. As a responsible party for a leaking
underground storage tank, you have previously received a letter from this Department
notifying you of the required work necessary to identify the extent of the contamination.
We are now requesting that this work, oudined in UT35,' be done in a timely manner.
in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County
Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48, the Kern County Environmental Health Services
Department requires a determination of the threat to the environment. Accordingly, you
must select an environmental contractor and submit a sire characterization workplan
proposal to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. The Workplan must be
approved by this Department before any work is started.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please immediately contact
me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
DG:cas
city-of, bak\6-22-16
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
............................ Hazardous Materials -Management--Program
( ) ~IET~J~ ) .o. 3 0 2 8 4
2202 South Milliken Avenue ~A~;{ ? 1~.: ~Date:, , ,.
(714) 947-2888 -
-'CONTRACTOR:" L..~ ...... -- ~ ,~
OeST,.A~,O.: A.M.RY220t s. Milliken Avh., OntariO/CA 91761
TIME IN:
SPECIAL INSTRU~IONS:
TIME OIJ~
~ Se~ices Rendered Cost
Disposal Fee ~.00 T~NKS REC~VED
O~. GAL~NS TYPE N~ TONS TOTAL
, . Extensive ~ading Time 150.00 F' S'
2~ ~ ~ .~4
Disposal Fee with ~rmit 300.00 .. ~ _ 550
~ Fiberglass Tank Disposal Fee ~ Tank 400.~ 1~0- 12
~ Delivered 200.00 ~500 D D .87
2000 ~ ~ .97
2500
~ Bobtail Disposal Fee 250.00 3000 ~ ~ ~.32
................. ~ 5000 ~ ~ 2.42
6000 ~ ~ 2.84
,O,A~ c~s ~ ,~oo ~ ~ ~.~
..... .ooo ~ ~ ~.~
~0 ~ ~ 3.82
All fees incurred are per load unless specified. ,10000 G C 4.~
Terms are net 30 Rays from date of invoice. 12000 ~ ~ 4.93
Contractor's signature represents acceptance ....
of terms for payment, and confirms that tank NO. OF TANKS TOTAL NET TONS
CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE 'F -- FIBERG~SS 'S -- STEEL 105
CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL I DESTRUCTION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY TH E RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE 'I'ANK(S) AS SPECIF,ED AOOVE. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED
.~~. _~N COMPLETELY DESTROYED FOR SCRAP PURPOSES ONLY.
AUTHORIZED REP. DATE
CONTRACTOR COPY
Ihkorsfleld, C&llfo~flim 9330~
Te~phofle (~05) ~ 1-3636
COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR~" '0 ('
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFFICER
· - ~~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL.TH
Vernon -~ R~md
Facility .am·
da2a: o~ acceptance et tank(a)
holde~ o~ the permit ~tth number noted abo~e'
that this fern i8 completedand returuad.
Address "'~. ~.
DaCe Tanks Removed
Section 2 - To be filled out by contractor "decontaminating tank(s):
Tank "Decontamination'* Contractor
Address Phone
Zip
Authorized representative of contracl:or certifies by signing below that
tank(s) have been decontaminated In accordance with Kern County Health
Department requirements.
/ $1gna'e~re / Title /
Sect/on 3 -~To ~be ~llled out and stoned by ~an authorized representative, of the
treatment, at·rage, or dispose! ~_.Aaci]lt¥ acceptln~
No, of' Tanks /
Title ~.- ~. ~
........ ~ --~ -* ~-ILIN6--I-N-S~k-U~foN~i ...... 'F~l'd "'in" half and'
(Form ~HMMP-150)
DIS'I~ICT OFFICES
' ' ~ ~ Sacramento. ~ali{orn,~
Pleaae print or type. (Form designed fo~ )itCh typewriter), and F~ ~
Document No. Information m the shaded areas
3. Generator's Name and MadmO A~drea8 A. State Mamfe~l Document Number
7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. U~ EPA iD Number E. Slate rransponer's ID
t~ Containers 13. Total 14.
11. US DOT Description (Including Proper ~ipping Name, ~zatd Class, and ID NumDer) ' Quami~ Unit Waste No.
No. Type ~t I Vol
a. ' - Slate
c. State . ,~: -
d.5 State
~A/~her
J. Additional Oes~iptions {or ~a~;tiala Listed ~ove ~ ~ndling ~es for Wastes ~st~ ~ove
GENERATOr'S CE~TIFICA~ON: I here~y d~lare l~al I~e co~le~ll of I~i~ co~sigflmeflt are lolly and acc~ralely desc~b~ ~ove ~y proper ~ip¢i~g ~ame
an~ are classitlel, pack~, marke~, an~ la~eled, and ate i~ all raspers ~ ptop~ coolition Ior tranapo~ ~y ~ig~way according to appli~le internalio~al ~nd
nalio~al ~overnme~l reg~lalion~.
II I ~m a large quanlily fleneralo¢, I ce~i~ t~at I have a program in place 1o reduce t~e' volume and toxicity of waste gefleraled lo l~e degree I have dele~i~ed
to be economically practicable and I~iI I ~ave selected l~e practicable mel~ofl of lrealmem, stotaoe, or disposal currently available to me w~ic~ minimizes
flrasenl an~ f~lura l~real to ~uman ~eall~ and the nnvironment; fiR, il I am a ~mall qua~lily generator, I ~ave ma~e a goo~ faith a~on to mimmize my
Oeneralion a~ ~ele~ l~e ~est wa~le ma~aoemem mel~od l~al is available Io me a~l l~al I c~orl.
PdntealTyped Name Signatuf~ Ir ~ M~I~ Day Year
17. T~an~po~e~ 1 ACknOWledgement el Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name Sign~ure -~- - /~ Mont~ Day Year
18. Transpolar 2 Acknowle~gem~t of Receipt et Materials
Printed/Typed Name Signalure Montn Day
Year
19. Discrepancy Ifldicaliofl Space
20. FactiJly Owne~ or Operator Ce~ilication of r~eipt ~f hazardous materials covered by this memfeat excegt aa noteoi~ Item-tg. -
DHS 8022 A (I/88)
EPA 87O(3---22
(Rev. 9-88) Previous eclitions ere obsolete.
· Do Not Write Below This Line
White: TSDF SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAy5
To: P.O. Box 3000, S<xramento, CA 95812.
SMC
"Laboratory
Analytical Chemistry
Client Name: Groundwater Resources, Inc.
Address : 5610 District Blvd., Suite 106
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Date samples received : 3-03-89
Date analysis completedi 3-08-89
Date of report : 3-08-89
Laboratory No. 572
....... '~-' ....... ' ~-~'"~ ........ Proj'ect---No ~ .... 78019
Purchase Order No. 2274
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
#572
ID: S-2 ugm/gm MRL,ugm/gm
Benzene 3.5 0.1
Toluene 3.7 0.1
Ethylbenzene 2.6 0.1
p-Xylene 5.5 0.1
m-Xylene 6.8 0.1
o-Xylene 2.8 0.1
Isopropylbenzene ND 0.]
TPH (Diesel) 6,300 1.0
Method of Analysis: California DOHS LUFT manual
MRL = Minimum Reporting Level
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ugm/gm = micrograms per gram
ND = Not detected
Stan Comer !
3155 Pegasus DriVe . Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 393-3597
P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield, CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623
GROUNDWATER 56~o'o~st,~ct Blvd., Suite 106
R ES 0 UR CE ~ ,~k.rsr~e~. CZ, f~n~ e 33 ~ 3
:, (805) 835-7700 -- Bakersfield
INDUSTRIES c.,,.m o~ CUSTOOY RECORD ,~, .~. ,~. !~'13) Z24-3147--~s~geles
S AP1F'LERS: (Signature) PF~JECT NUt-IBER COND IT ION ~: ~~..,"'~ .....
,. v~ ~r ~ REI'IARKS
S AP1PLE $ At'IPLE LOC AT ION '(: [-C
RelinquLshed by ~S:gnature) Date/Time Received by :(Signature) Relinqulsted bv :(Signature) Date/Time ReCeived by :(Signature)
i Received bg: (Signature)
Relinquished bM: (Signature) Date/Time Received bg: (Signature) Relinquished I~1: (Signature) Date/Time
t Date/Time Received'for Laboratorg by: Date/Time Remarks
Relinquished bg :(Signature) ~ ~' /~t~' ? "~' ' "~' ,~. -
groundwater resources inc.
March 10, 1989
5610 DISTRICT BLVD., SUITE 106
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93313
General Engineering Contractor
Class A License No. 520768
Mr. William Scheide
Kern County Health Department
Environmental Health Division
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re:
Tank Removal
Bakersfield
2101 "H" Street
Dear Mr. Scheide,
Transmitted herewith are documents relating to the subject tank
removal:
1) Hazardous Waste Manifest #88;133839 for rinsate.
2) Underground Tank Disposition Tracking Record.
3) American Metal Recycling, Inc. Tank Disposal Form.
4)
SMC Laboratory analysis report. Only one sample was taken
from beneath the tank with your approval on site. Because
of obvious diesel contamination and because of the recent
history of product loss, it was judged unnecessary to take
a sample deeper than two feet.
5) Chain of custody for soil sample.
If you have any questions, please call our office at 835-7700.
Very truly yours,
Rex $. Young
State Registered Geologist
RJY:dji
Encls.
cc: Mr. John Patterson
Environmental Health DIV.
KMn County H~al~
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9383, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389 (805) 835-7700
OTHER LOCATIONS: LOS ANGELES (213) 724-3147 PLACENTIA (714) 528-2415
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
· Telephone (805) 861-3636
· DEPARTI~,-~
'- KER~ COUNTY HEALTH
.. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
Factltt //ame
. ....
'- "'. ',--.'~'~ ' ' .... . "'/~ ..;~ ~'..'.
'- ". ~hi~" ~o~~ ~ to be ~etu~ned to the ~e~ ~ounty
that thJ~ ~o~ ~ completed ~nd ~et~ned ........ : -- ...~...'.,.?: -....
~ '~:"~:~'-' Date ran~. ~e~o~ed ~ ~-5-~
~ction 2 - To be filled out ~ contractor "deconta~lnatinE tank,s}:
Tank "Deconta. ination" Contractor ..... ~ ~ ~~-
Zip
Authorized representative of contractor certifies by si~nin~ belo~ that
tank(s) have been decont~inated In accordance ~lth Eern County Health
Department requirements. ..
treatment, storage, or disposal facility accepting ~ank(s):
dO o rn , b ;
Date
Tanks
Sl~ature
(Authorized
* * * ~IAILINO INSTRUCTIONS: Fold in ha:If and staple. ·
(Form #HNNP-150)
DI:~TRICT OFFICES
2700 'M' Street, Ste. 300 (:'
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
EnvironmenTal H, ealth Services DeparTment
C.O.L.T. i
~arch 8, 1989
Mr. John Patterson
City of Bakersfield
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California
93301
SUBJECT:
Location: 2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, California
Known As: Bakersfield Fire Department, Station 1
PERMIT #: 160013
Dear Mr. John Patterson:
This letter Is an official notice to inform you that the property described
above has been determined bY Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of
an unauthorized release of hazardous ~mterials from an underground storage tank.
This notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a
responsible party for this property.
As a responsible party, you mus~ provide for all studies and work relating
to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these' activities.
California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Cod6
Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result
of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE
CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED.
Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum
required site workplan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting
environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms,
example Illustrations, and a section discussing the answers to commonly asked
questions.
According to the criteria listed below and In Attactment "C", your site
................... has-been designated as environmentally sensitive. All enviroumentally sensitiVe
sites are automatically enrolled into a State contract program for recovery of
oversight costs. The environmental sensitivity criteria for sites are as follows:
Highest historic ground water is within 100 feet of
ground surface, or
- --75 feet~of tanks(s)2-O'r
4. Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge
area, or
5. Permitting Authority determines possible adverse
environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique
~ wildlife habitat areas.
The cost incurred.by.Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight
-Of the work for the site characterization~ feasibility study, ~emedia~lon action
plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or
permits. These costs will be recove]~ed by Kern County Environmental Health
under the terms of the State contract described below. This contract ONLY
pertains to costs associated with oveJ~sight.
Nearest surface water in unlined conveyance is within
.75 feet of tank(s), or
Nearest__SgrlcultUral or domestic water well is within
STAT~ CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides
a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County
oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill
the State Water Resources Control Board under this State con<tact.
The State will then charge you, a cesponsible party for both the
costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
Accordingly, Attachment "D", the w.ill serve as the official notification of
enrollment into the State Contract.
If you should have any questio]ns regarding this matter, please contact
John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-~6~6.
Sincerely,
~ary ~eddell
Assistant County Administrative 0fficer
Environmental Health
attachments
Street,
KERN
Environmental He~lth Services
y ~
Dep~ent
ATTACHlVlENT 'D"
............ · .......... . ... ................... ~March 8, 1989
Mr. John Patterson
City of Bakersfield
1501Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California
93301
SUBJECT:
Location: 2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, California
Known As: Bakersfield Fire Department, Station !
PERMIT #: 160013
Dear Mr. John Patterson:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (10) Calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will 'be placed under the terms explained ~elow:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and s~:ate agency administrative and'oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of over,geeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, .in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(ies) have been'identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall relLmburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such Costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please'contact John Nllon,
contract manager, at. (805) 861-3636.
............................. Slncere~!y
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative 0fftcer
Environn~ental Health
Attachments
"~- -~' 767 726 3.28 ..... ,,.-
HECEIPT FOIl CEIITIF~ED MAIL
N0 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Street an~'~ No~
/~'~ /
P.O.. State and ZIP (~ode
Ce~itied Fee
Spec)al Delivery Fee
ResInc(ed Delivery Fee
Relurn ~ece~p( showin9
lo whom and Date Delivered
ReIurn ~eceipt showing to whom.
Da(e, and Address of Dei~ve~
TOTAL Postage and Fees S
Poslmark or Dale
c
:o
ITl
KERN COUNTY IIEALTH DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IIEALTll
1700 FLOWER STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
(805} 861-3636
PTO
/
# OF TANKS TO BE ABANDONED
LENGTH OF PIPINO TO ABANDON
APPLICATION , FOR PER.lIT FOR PERMANENT
C LOS URE / ABANDO~rbiE NT OF UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTA{.~CES STORAGE FACILITY
Tills APPLICATION IS FOR~ ~ REMOVAL, OR [] ABANDONMENT lin PLACE (FILL OUT ONE APPLICATION PER FACILITY)
'PROJECT.' CONTACT=": '-:~-= ......................... . ........ -~.-=---= {p,ONE , "::.~326--39-1t=== :.__::::=~.{~E¢/T~R _(RU~,. LOCATIONS ONLYJ
' - - .......... .............. { ' DAYS- - '='= .... -~===~E~'~----~'~:~.
I
John Pn~n~ I .~,m~s- 833~517
FACILITY NAHE ADDRESS NEAREST CROSS STREET
B~r~f~ld ~ ~f ~ ~ 1 2101 H st. ~] s~.
OWNER ~ ....... ADDRESS PRONE
Ci~ of ~sfield 2101 H st (805 ) -
326 qq] ]
TANK REMOVAL CONTRACTOR
::~i~rOund ~wafei~ "Resources
~RoPOSED PROJECT STARTINO DATE {CALIFORNIA
{
3-~.- 80 . 1520768
PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT CONTRACTOR
7700 .....
INSURER
State Comp. Ins. Fund
PRONE
ADDRESS {PHONE
'" ....... 1'- 5610 District Blvd': '"=" ..... - .............. J ...... ~-805? 835
LICENSE # WORKEJ~'S COMPENSATION ·
0793569
%DDRESS
Same as above ( ) -
~ORKER'S COMPENSATION f INSURER PRONE
( ) --
LABORATORY THAT WILL ANALYZE SAMPLES IDDRESS FHONE
S M C Po box 80835 93380 (805 ')393 -3597
d
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MATERIALS STORED
rANK # VOLUME C.£MICAL STORED (NON-COMMERCIAL NAME)
1 ., 550 Oi e.q~l
DATES STORED CIIEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED
1966 TO~ none
TO
TO
~AT£R TO FACILITY PROVIDED BY
Ca1 Wa~er
~EAREST WATER WELL - GIVE DISTANCE AND DESCRIBE TYPE IF WITHIN §00 FEET
21 st & C. st
8ASJS FOR SOIL TYPE AND GROUNDWATER D£PTH DETERMINATION
JDEPTII TO GROUNDWATER
150 feet
JSOIL TYPE AT FACILITY
S~ndy ~i l~
Cal Water
TOTAL NUMBER OF SAMPLES TO BE ANALYZED JSA~PLES
{
2
WILL.BE ANALYZED FOR:
TPH,Benzene,Oil & Grease
z
]ESCRIBE IIOW RESIDUE IN TANK(S) AND PIPING IS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COMPANIES):
Transported by B P Oil to Gibson refinery
iIESCRIBE BOTII Tile DISPOSAL METIIOD AND DISPOSAL LOCATION FOR:
TANK ( S )
Both tank and piping will be recycled at A M R of ontario Ca.
PIPING
2202 s'Millken Ave (714) 988-8000
* * PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE ~;[DE OF TllIS SREET BEFORE SU.BMITTINO APPLICATION .FOR REVIEW
SIGNATURE ~ , /% ~q~.~----- TitLE Maintenance Craftsworker DATE
/
(Form #RMMP-140)
3-2-89
2700 'M' Street, Ste. 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301'
(805) 861-3636
KERN
COUNTY
~nviron~ental Health Services Deparment
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE ".'~_'~ PERMIT NUMBER A884-I6''
FACILITY N~E/ADDRESS: . "- ,;~<?O~ER ( S ) N~:g/ADDRESS :' :'~=::~, ,/CONT~CTOR: "~:~[~'~!?
' -.~--~',...;-',:e ~t.,~J~''' :~ - , '., .~,:~. :. <~,~t--: .,.,~ ';~.t ~t~.:,~.e.t.~c~r~.,~%t:..'?i'~,~iA~.:.~3~'" -".~'.,: ,.': ~ -.' ~./, ..: ~"~ ~.,,~,;.~f.-'r, :;;",:~,~.~.~:~;~.~5~:~.,~'?,r.:.
.::~:,Bakersfteld F~re Deot.'-~::~.~:~.;.CltV .of.,Bakersfield ~,,e[,.~:.~,.,~-Gro~dwater
2101- H ,Street ~-,-...::. ',.(~:~,.,.~:Bakersfleld, CA 93301 .... :,.,,::.,,..5610 District,..,(:>?~:,?;~.:.'[~=:'; ..
" :'";'":'.~"":('" :' ' .... ': ': '?':':none :''''':805-3 2623796 '":'::'[/':'F'~=:]: Phone: 805-835-~700''
PE~T FOR C~OSURg OF . ',--~'.'=: :. PE~IT ~XP~RES - ' "/.-June 2, 1'989
" ' ..... - '~' ' '"
~0OATION APPROVgD BY' .
Bill Schelde
' POST ON PREMISES '
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW:
l. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may
be required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.
2. 'Permittee must notify the County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank removal to arrange 'for
required inspection(s).
3. Tank closure activities must be.per Kern County Environmental Health and
Fire Department approved methods as described in Handout #UT-30.'
4. If any contractors other than those listed .on permit and permit
application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted by the
specialist listed on the permit.
5. Tank removal contractor must have a qualified company employee on-site
supervising the actual tank removal. -.
6. Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or conStituents to be
: sampled for which are described below and ,tn Handbook #UT-30 must
- receive prior ~pproval by the Environmental. Health Department.~";'r''--~''.'''
a. A minimum of two samples must be retrieved beneath the center of
the tank at depths of approximately two feet and ~ix feet.
b. A minimum of two sam,ples must be retrieved .at depths of
..................................... approximately_..~wo._._feet and six feet for.every
pipe run and also near-'~e dispenser area(s).
v' PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE · :'.; . :" .~ ,' PERMIT NUMBER A884-16 j' "'
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ;"'" · -" _ · ' "- ADDENDUM
. ,"''; .7 .. ~ ::.,:;.: All ~ d~esel :.samples' ~ust be ~analyzed for benzene 'and
' '""' ~'"~' ' ' '?:;¥hydrocarbons-d~esel ( oi i and qrease ) .. '"~. , ..... ~:'. )."q?~-%J~jf". ~.~': '~"f.-~-~s]~?~'~?~?f:~t~t
8 ..... ..,C~pies . of : transportation . manifests mus~ ..~:be _..submitted :~.lj~to '. the
"' ::: ":' :-': '["7~S:E~viro~ental Heai~h Department within five days of
':.'".',:8'~..~9. ".'~:?.?~11 appt~cable state laws for hazardous waste d~sposal,:.~.transpor~a~on,
({~?:~,:~9~f;,~:~%~o= ~:trea~men~ must-be adhered .to,~.~:'~The Kern County :Enviro~en~aI~;jHeaith
'"/'f~'~,?,;'~:~:~..:lO .. ~}:Permi tree is responsible for 'making '~ure that ~t tank -disposition "~racking
' :,:':~:<~;~;{~¢~}{¢~}~.'record" '":issued with '~ ~his · permit '::ts ~¢:properly'~:~:filled ~out :~¢and ~eturned
?~":'ll.'%'Advise this office of the time 'and date of :the proposed, samplin~wm~h . - 48 hours advance no~ice. · ..... · .---- -- · .... .',.':~
12. ~esults must ~e submitted to this office within three days of analysis
".;-... ~,,,:~::.)comple~ion. ' ............................. ' ....... '
BS:dr
3-2-89
permits\bksfldfi.re
FILE CONTENTS INVENTORY
Permit to Abandon # of Tanks
Permit to Construct
Permit to Operate # /(oc~o!~ ~ _
Application to Abandon / Tank(s)
Application to Construct
Application to Operate Tank Sheets
.... Amended Permit Conditions
Annual Report Forms
Daie
Date
Date ,c/"~/~ -~--~
Plot Plans
Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator
Inspection Reports
Correspondence -. Received
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Correspondence - Mailed
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Unauthorized Release Reports
Abandonment/Closure Reports
Sampling/Lab Reports
MVF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist)
MVF Plan Check (New Construction)
STD Plan Check (New Construction)
~MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility)
STD Plan Check (Existing Facility)
"Incomplete Application" Form
Permit Application Checklist
Permit Instructions . Discarded
Tightness Test Results
Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits
Date
Bate
Date
Environmental Sensitivity Data:
Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs
Location of Water Wells
....... Sta.te~ent of Underground.Conduits
Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data
Photos Construction Drawings Location:
Miscellaneous
2700 "M" Slreet, Suite. 300
Bai~rsfleid. CA 93301 . '
COUNTY OF KERN
~nvironmental Health Services De~.n
Mr. Ralph Huey
Hazardous Materials Division. City of Bakersfield
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield. CA 93301
............ ......... ocation: 21ol "H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Known As: Fire Station # 1
PERMIT #: 160013
P 087 709 712 ~
RECEIPT FOR CER~.T.~.ED I~AIL
NO INSURANCE COVEP, AGE PHOVIDED
S
~Restncted De~ve~ Fee
Return ReceiPt s~ow~ng
to whom an~ Date Delivered
Relurn Rece~ s,~m,wing to whom.
Date. ~ Address ot Deliver'
..:ro:~..p~.~. ~e~ .... ·
Poslma~k or Date
.. !
Dear Mr. Ralph Huey:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described above
has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of an
unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This
notice is sent to you because our record:s indiCate that you are a responsible party
for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating to the
above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California
Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 require
a determination of the threat to the environment as a result of this release. THE
RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CHARACTERIZATION,
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S
REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find attachment
"A", Handbook UT-35. which states the minimum required site workplan activities, the
necessary requirements for selecting environmental contractors qualified to perform
this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrations, and a section discussing the
answers to commonly asked questions.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work
for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site
remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs
are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two ways described
below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under
the terms of the (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option, These
options ONLY pertain to costs associated with oversight.
(A) STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaklng Underground. Storage Tank Pilot ~rogram p~ovides a mechanism for
the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County wit1 conduct the
necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State
contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs
incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
(3)
COUNTY LOCAL A6RIgEN]gNT
pay'the County-'div~'-a~d-a~'id'"'fhe'additi'on bf state c°~ts'.-'Prior to the County's
performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 .(one thousand
.... Kern. County Environmental. Health is providing this option for_.those, who prefer-to ............
dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for
County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party,
must enter into a County agreement, attachment "B".
To safeguard the environment, the environmental ~ensitivity (Attachment "C") of this
._sit, has_been reviewed by. Environmental Health_~o. determine the potential-.threa~fo~._=_.= ....
groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive
may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in 'an
.environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Option Agreement:
however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Option Agreement,
should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex
hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the
State contract to pay for County oversight lctivities. The County of Kern reserves this.
right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive
area.
It' ls necessary for you to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of
receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice:
either the State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the
County's Local Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure "B", and return
it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County'of
Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health .2700 M Street, Suite 300,
Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Underground Storage Tank Contract Administrator.
If you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made this selection
and that you have read attachment "D", the official notification, in a letter sent to
the address indicated above.
Failure to respond in writing to this notice within ten (10) calendar days will
automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under
the terms of the State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Enclosure
"D" will then serve as the official notification of your enrollment into the State
Pllot Program for Underground Storage Tanks.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon,
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Gary Wicks
Director. Resource Management Agency
attachments
COUNTY OF KERN
Henlfll Services Depc~.ment
27O0 "M' S~ee~ Snl~ 3OO
lbrkersflekL CA 9330! ..
(805) 86t-3636
(805) ~6t.3429 ' Fax N-.-het
ATTACHMENT "D"
June 13, 1989
Mr. Ralph Huey
Hazardous Materials Division, City of Bakersfield '-
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
SUBJECT:
Location: 2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Known As: Fire Station # 1
PERMIT #: 160013
Dear Mr. Ralph Huey:
This letter will serve as the off:icial notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and st;ute agency administrative and oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part. :from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund: and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE I~BY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 2§3.60 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and ·local agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nllon.
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Gary Wicks
D~rector. Resource Management Agency
attachments
AG#I£'UL TUllE
C#£1~ICAI A#AL Y$15
P£TROLEU~
,BORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Petroleum Hydrocarbons , (SOIL)
- ....... .'. £'_L~Z.L~:~_ _.:~ -__- :: . ....... :LZ'i-ZZ~' ...... Z-_'Zi.£Z '-'£-'L ...... - ---: ..£Z~_ 7'-[7~-?ZL~._.~ .......... L.---- -~' . '.~ '"~'~ '~L.'TL..~-7_:'~7.7- '-. ~'7~.Z ~"~ :~' ~ L_~L~:~£ __
McNabb Construction
7808 Olcott Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention :Bryan McNabb
Lab No.: 3364-1
Sample Desc.:
Date of
Report: i5-May-89
City of Bakersfield-
'~"-2Ist-&' "H'': St;' 2' GasOline .... ~----~
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
04-May-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:'
04-May-89
Constituent
Reporting
Units
DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
EXTRACTED: COMPLETED:
09-May-89 il-May-89
Miniaum
Analysis Reportin~
Results Level
Benzene Ug/g None Detected 0.02
Toluene ' ug/g 0.39 /0.02
Ethyl Benzene' ug/g 0.24 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 2.40 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 5.80 0.02
o-Xylene · ug/g 4.24 0.02
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Pet.
ug/g None Detected
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H/S/-. T.P.H.(fd~ Diesel~
(Carbon Disulfide Extraction)
500.00
0.02
Dry Matter Basis, ~ matogr~i
Comments: Sample e~ Igasoline chrc c fingerprint~
Gasolin~TPH: 235.91 ug/g ~ C~~ ]-~ ~
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of petroleum hydrocarbons
utilizing a diesel'standard. As outlined, by the California D.O.H.S.
These petroleum ?~drocarbons are in addition to the constituents
specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all constituents
on this report.
-California D:'O; H. S. --Cert.--.~t02 .............................
E~in Robert Plaisance
Chemist
A~/II£LIL TU~gf
£1t£MICAL ANAL Y$15
BORATORIF.q_., Ino.
J. J. EGLIH, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PII.:RCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Petroleum Hy~.~carbons
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
~7808 Olcott Ave.
Bakersfield, CA ·93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Lab No.: 3364-2
'Date of
Report: 15-May-89
Sample Dasc.: City of Bakersfield
DATE SAMPLE
COLLEbM'KD:
04-May-89
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
RECEIVED @ LAB: EXTt~%CTED: COMPLETED: ·
04-May-89 09-]~%y-89 Il-May-89
RePOrting A~lysis Reportin~
Units Results Level
ug/g None Detected 0.02
ug/g 0.54 /0.02
ug/g. 0.17 0.02
ug/g 2.07 0.02
ug/g 4.94 0.02
ug/g 3.48 0.02
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected
Hydrocarbons . ug/g . .'"
TEST METHOD: California State D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for~iesel/
(Carbon Disulfide Extraction)
750.00
0.02
Dry Matter Basis :--v
Sample exhi~matograPhic f' ~znge~t ~
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON~-~%m~.%f/z~s~i°n of petroleum hydrocarbons
utilizing a diesel', standard. As outlined by the California D.O.H.S.
These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents
specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS:
· on this report.
The sum total of all constituents
California D.O~H.S. Cert.-$102
Robert Plaisauce Chemist
COUNTY OF
KER U'
2700 "M"' Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(riOS) 861.3636
(805) 861.3429 Fax Number
.. pERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Environmental Health Services Department
· . . · '~.' ~,.. ' -'. . . ' . '. . .- · 'u, ~ ' , '. - ..-~; .-..: .-<' -~.'..,. .". .... -
, ,:,,FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
;.~.2101 "H" Street L : .... -~ ~. .... 1501 Truxtun Avenue ........... >2080 So. Union Avenue
'~?'.~'Bake=sffeld, 'CA '.,~'9330i .'}L>?h J:'~[~:.Bakersfield, CA ~ 93301'~}:~?}}:Bakersfleld, :~':~CA/~}:93307
"~ . , ~ ', '-'~'.', ','. -
'. -" . .<~%;'. ~ . .~'.' '~,-:.'<: :~::" ' 'F~., ~'~ ' . .,>~ t:' ','~-.'-~,' t.:t ~ T':" "-:'>:~,~,?t~'~;W~;,ed~'.?' .;.:_r~: '~ ,~,::;~.: ~f?~ ?';~:<,:~ '.. ': ~':~)/".?:f'%'-,~?xy)~ ;,;:~/?~%~<:'~'~V~/ '
' ' ' '- .... '
Phone: (805)326-3724 Phone: (805) 834-~1d0
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES -' July 24~ i98 ,
TANK(S)
LOCATION
AT ABOVE
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
A copy of this permit has been p]3ovided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 tWO working days ~ to tank (removal) or $nerttng and
filling) to arrange for required inspections(s).
Perm/tree must obtain a City F:ire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action.
Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health
Department and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook
#UT-30.
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE PERMIT NUMBER A9~2-16
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS ADDENDUM
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
,An~ deviation from sample locations ~nd number~ or constituents
. v sampled for which ~re desoribed below and in 'Handbook ~UT-~0 mus~
pr~r approval by the Environmental Health Department.. ·
a.~(.Tank size 1,000 gallons or .less) - a minimum of two samples must~be
.... />.~retrieved beneath the center of the t~depths of approximately
5.. If ~ny con~rac~ors or disposal facilities o~her ~han ~hose lis~d on permi~
::~ and p~mi~ applica~ioD ~re ~o be u~ilized, prior ~pprovzl mus~ be
6.' Soil Sampling (piping area) .-.-' ::.:.-... >..'.-.'... .... .,:,.:'.~::~.~j:~?~'~7.f.~::'..'-[::
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six fee~ for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near .the
dispenser area(s) ' . · .............
7. Sample analysis :' ' ........... ':"" "': ~-"-"~ ........
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene,
toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons.
Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental HeaIth
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil.
10.
11.
Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal·
Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling'with 24
hours advance notice.
12.
Results must be submitted to this office within three
completion·
ACCEPTED BY:...
~_DS.:cas ............ ~
\A912-16
4-21-07
DATE
days of analysis.~
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT PHONE I SIGNATURE
~'T'REET .... CITY ~TATE ZIP
_ UNKNOWN
FACILITY NAME (IF APPLICABLE) - . OPERATOR - - PHONE
CROS$STREET :-; -: ._ · .... ~: : TYPEOFAREA [:~ COMMERCIAL ~-t INDUSTRIAL'[] RURAL '~YPEOFBUSINES$ I"~. RETAILFUEL8TAT10N '
[] RESIDENTIAL [] OTHER [] FARM [~ OTHER ~-~t~l~
,..~ AGENCY NAME ,. CONTACT PERSON ..... PHONE
LOCAL AGENCY .,:. : ~' ~,
lx, C. ~Jv'. He-Ac DOf..ORE~, ~ou (~,-I (Eo.q
REGIONAL BOARD PHONE
( )
(I) NAME QUANTITY LOST (GALLONS)
C¢,450c/,,kiE ~ u.~.owN
[] U~NOWN
DATE DISCOVERED Y HOW DISCOVERED [] INVENTORY CONTROL [] SUBSURFACE MONITORING [] NUISANCECONDITION8
MI MI D{ OI YI [] TANKTEST [] TANK REMOVAL [] OTHER
CATE DISCHARGE BEGAN . METHOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
MI MI '';I ' 0t' YI '';I '. [~ UNKNOWN' . ':._ [] REMOVECONTENTS [] REPLACE TANK ' [] CLOSETANK
~o,.,.CE o~ °,=HA.GE TAN'~ ON'Y~AP~,"',' MA~'=',~ C~SE<S)
[] TANK LEAK -'E~ UNKNOWN ~ GAL [] FIBERGLASS [] OVERFILL . [] RUPTURE/FAILURE
[] PIPINGLEA~ .- AGE ~V~/~ YRS .[ [~ STEEL [] CORROSION [] UNKNOWN
[] OTHE. E3 U.KNOWN [] OTHE. [] S,'," [] OTHE.
OHEOK ONE'ONLY
~ UNDETERMINED E~, 8OILONLY [] GROUNDWATER [] DRINKINGWATER-(CHECKONLYIFWATERWELLSHAVEACTUALLYBEENAFFECTED)
CHECK ONE ONLY .:
~ sITE INVESTIGATION IN PROORES$ (DEFINING EXTENT OF PROBLEM) ['~1 OUEANUP IN PROGRESS [] SIGNED OFF (CLEANUP OOMPLETED OR UNNEC~SSAR~
[] NO ACTION TAKEN" [] POST CLEANUP MONITORING IN PROGRES8 [] NO FUNDS AVAILABLE TO PROCEED []: EVALUATING CLEANUP ALTERNAT1VE$
CHECK APPROPRIATE ACTION(S)(SEE BACK FOR DETAILS)
[] CONTAINMENTaARRIER(c8) [] EXCAVATE&TREAT(ET)' [] PUMP & TREAT GROUNDWATER (GT) [] REPLACE SUPPLY (RS)
[] TREATMENTATHOOKUP(HU) . .~'-~ NOACTIONREQUIRED(NA) [] OTHER(OT)
2700 '~1" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 9330!
(SOS) 86t-3636
(805) 861-3429 Fnx Number
COWTY c
Environmental Heallth Services Department
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS' ~'~'~-
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
O~ql~R ( S ) NAME/ADDRESS:
CONTRACTOR:
City of Bakersfield ......... --'. R.L;W-..,,Equipment,Co,..
1501Trux'tun Avenue 2080 So. Union Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Bakersfield, CA 9330?
License #294074
Phone:(805)326-3?24
Phone:(805) 834-1100
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF
PERMIT EXPIRES July 24, 1989
1 TANK(S)
LOCATION
AT ABOVE
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
~'an Starkey d
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
A copy of this permit has been provided to the Kern County Fire Department.
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805) 861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or inerting and
filling) to arrange for required inspections(s).
Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action.
Tank closure activities must be per. Kern County Environmental Healtf
Department and Fire Department approved methods as desd~ibed in Handboo~
#UT-SO.
PERMIT FOR pERMANENT CLOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
PERMIT NUMBER A912-16
ADDENDUM
.::-~::~_:::-__Any_deviat~on---:fr°m ~ample locations and numbers or constituents to be
sampled for which are described below and in Handbook #UT-30 must receive
prior approval by the Environmenta/ Health Department.
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or ]!ess) - a minimum of two samples must be
retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately
~two feet and six feet.
5. If any contractors or disposalfacilities other than'those listed on permit
' ~ .......and. permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted
by the specialist listed on the permit.
Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two.samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the
dispenser area(s)·
Sample analysis
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene,
toluene, xylene, and total pe~:roleum hydrocarbons.
Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must .be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil. '
10.
Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is pm?operly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 24
hours advance notice.
Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis
completion. ~
TCEPTED BY:
~:cas
;912-16
21-0~ ....
DATE
__ Chain of custody ~Degan for all analysis samples and
holding samples, and tl'ansterred to approved laDo.ratol~¥
for analysis.
, /PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SAMPLING cOMPLETED.
__/ Properly completed Tan~ Tracking Form returned within 14
days of tank departure.
/ Oopies of all hazardous waste manifests for ali tank
rinseate, wastes, ~azardous tanKs/piping submitted.
~.- --. ........... ,-~, .... - .... -- ample--.-'~--analysis ....... ~esu.lts_~ ~submitted .- for -- all ---..--sample
locations for all requJ, red ana1yses as per permit,
analyses run no later than 14 days after samples
oDtai~ed.
TANK PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT COMPLETE.
BS: cas
Scheide\Checkl is
State pt Ca.lorn=~--Health end Welta,e Agency See Instructions on Back of Page ~ DePartment of Health Services
Form Approved OMB No. 2050.--0039 (Expires ~; and Front 7 Toa~ Substances Control Oiviaion
Please print or ~pe. (Form deaignec/for use ! (f.'" "ch t~cMwrfter). ,( Sacramento. CatitornM
UNIFORM HAZARDOU'.--'~'T~T' ..'ator'e USEPAIONo. - ~"~ P"[~e I
-- .] Document NO. , In~etM M ~e ~lded
7. Tran~o~er 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Num~M E. ~ate Tr~M'S ~
.9;~ea~na~ ~a~l~ ~e and Site.~dress ........ 10. U8 EPA ID NumbM ............. ,~..~te ~t~l ~ ........ .,. ' '
12. gonta~em 13. Total 14. L
11. US OOT ~e.cd~lion (Incl~ing Prop~ Shipping Nama, Hazard glass, ~nd ID Numbs) Ouanfi~ ~ Wa.te No,
8. State
b. State
/ ~h~
c. State
'~A/~
d. 8tats
EPA/~
II I II!!
J. Add~al Dea~pti~8 f~ Materials Listed Abo~ ~ ~dl~ ~e8 f~ Wastes ~at~ ~e
15. Sp~ial Handling tnst~ctions and Additional Info.etlon
GENERATOR'S CERTIFICA~ON: I hereby declare that the coat.ts of this c~signment are ful~ and accurate~ descfib~ a~ve ~ proper shipping name
and are classified, packed, marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transpo~ by h~way according to applicable international and
national government regulations.
If I am a large quantity generator, I ceni~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxic~y of waste g~erat~ to the d~ree I have det~in~
to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disDo~l currently availab~ to me which minimizes the
pre.en~ an= future threat ;o human neann eno [he environment; OR, if I am ~ small quantity generator, i have ma~e ~ g~ faith effoA ;o Minimize hty
generation and select the beat waste management method that ia available to me and that I can afford.
18. Transpolar 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of. Material~
Printed/Ty~ Nam~ ~_ _ ~' Si ' 're Month Day Year
OHS 8022 A (I/88)
EPA 870O--22
(Rev. 9-88) Previous editions are obsolete.
Do Not Write Below This Line
White: TSDF SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAYS
To: P.O. Box 3000, Sacramento, CA 95812
1700 Flower Street
Bakerslleld, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636..
KERr,I COUNTY I.II-'ALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENI*AL HEALI'H DIVISION
HEAl.IH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
~.F)~---~--~--~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
d~Ol~l~~ ' Vernon & .elchard
* * UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION T~CKING RECORD * * ' '
' ,,~ ~,'?Thls for= Is ~to be returned to the 'Kern County ilealtl~ Depart=~n~ ~lthln ~ ::~/~?[,:~:./.~:~
-~,' .......~.'~/-days off acceptance .o~ tank(s) by disposal 'o~ recycling [aell. lty. ~.~:~.The
' - holder'~:-'~'~ tlie-' p'e-~l'~~ "wi th ' ~umb~-~i~i~d ~'~V-~'l'~--P-~ponalble:~::for.-
.-.. that this [orm is completed and returned.. ' . . . . . ; "."
,Section 1' ,~KTo,-be-'~tl.led out,~' [auk removal contractor: .~. ~ '-i:-'~'~s'. ..... :~?-:. ',.
Da~e Ta,,ks .emoved ~-~ -~ / ' No. off Tank,
Section 2 - To be filled out by contractor "decontaminating tank(s):
Tank "lJecontamJ. nation" Contractor '~ ~ ~C~ ~~'
AuUmrlzed representative o[ eon~ractor certl[les by signing below tha~
tank(s) have "~een decontaminaLed In accordance ~l~h gem County ~malU~
Department reqU'~':~men[s .... - '" "~
~lg~ure, Title
~ectlon~ -T~ b~ filled out and siEned ~ a~ authorized representative of the,
treatment, storage, or disposal faclllt~ aec~Pttn~,tank(s~:
Faclllt7 Name · . ~ ; ~'~ ~: .....
Date Tanks Re~_
Signature ~~
(Authorized RepresenLatlve)
MAILING INSTRUCTIONS: FoJd Jn haJf and staple'.
(Form #II~JHP-150 )
DISTRICT OFFICES
Delano . . ,~ella , MoJave . Rldgecrest Shafler . Taft
Date Rec'd: , BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO.
Client: "' ; Sampler: Sample Type: Analysis R~quested:
~e~nq~sh~ By: Date: T~ ~ceiv~ By: Dat~: Tn~: Coming:
¥~llow: BC {..mb Copy
PROVIDE DRAWING OF PHYS LAYOUT OF FACILITY USING SP IDED BELOW.
ALI. OF THE FOLLfT~ING I. NFORMATION MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDER FOR APPLICATION TO
PROCESSE~ - :.
TANK(S), PIPING & DISPENSER(s), IN(ZLUDING LENGTHS /k~ DIMENSIONS
~ :~::oms~ S~,~:.:N~ m~:oNs Dm:<:~A~ B:~ TH~S S~O:. "®,
¥'' NORTH ,~:~D~ . <.-. _:..,¥ .' . :._--::-'"v_-:-:. __:: : ' '- .....
.: ..........~..'..:, .......................... ':. '. ,' · "'~" ,. ,, , , '," .-, ! ~'4
.... ' "-" -'-'- '- ': .... ':.::::,::'... - . ~.:.L. ~..-. :,',' :-
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
DIVISION DP ENVIRONNENTAL HEALTH
1700 FLOWER STREET. BAKERSFIELD. CA*'93305
(805) 881-3836
PTO~ NT~RNAL~~,US~ ONLY: * PTA
APPLICATION DA~~ --~
· OF TANKS TO BE ABANDONED / ·
LENGTH OP PIPIND TO ABANDON.,_ P
APPLI CATI ON FOR P'~-RMI T FO.R PERMANENT
CLOSURE/ABANDONM:~-NT OF UNDEROROUND .~, *' :
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITy ...........
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR REN'OVA~. OR ABANDONiiENT IN PLACE :., (FILL OUT ONcE APPLICATION ~ER FACILITY) ~ ....
6
HENICAL CONPOSITION OP NATERIALS STORED
ANK · VOLUME CHEMICAL $TORED/.NON-COMMER~CIAiL NAME)
IWATER TO FACILITY PRB~'~'DED BY ~, -- .A . _..-.-.-- ,, [DEFTH TO GROI.~D#AT~R
/ ' *' ; l
i~ts FOR satL ~Pe ~D GROUND AT~ Dg~ DET] p; .I --
I / /
~ HOW RESIdUE.IN T~KIS) ~D P~ING. IS ~ Bi R~O~ ~ DISPOSED OF (INCLUDt ~NSPO~ATION ~D DISPOSAL COLONIES)k .
. IP ~ ~ ' · .
I If PLEASE PROVIDE INFOR~T~ON RE~ED ON RE~SE SIDE O~ THIS SHE~ REFORE SUBMI~ZNG APPLICATION FO~ R~TEW
(Porn ~H~P-140)
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
Telephone (805} $61-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
May 4, 1990
Ralph. Huey
City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Division
2130 "G" Street
--,Bakersfield~ CA 93301.__
SUBJECT: Location
Known As
Permit #
· 2101 "H" Street,'Bakersfield, CA
Fire Station #1
160013
Dear Mr. Huey:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at
the above site. With the provision thai: the information provided to this agency
was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this
office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the
California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future
operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up
existing, additional', or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause
or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water
quality or public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site
may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the
property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report
content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
If you havre any questions regarding this; matter, please contact Dolores Gough at
(8051 86j)~3636.
Program Manager
Environmental Health Services Department
'CB:DG:cas '
cc: Pacific Geotechnical Associates
Central Velley Regional Water Quality Control Board
\160013.clt
,FIt. F: ._'ONI'EN'r.~. IN~..~H.TOHY
~Const[uct~on Pe[~iC "~ Date
~Pe[mlc Co abandonl No. o~"Ta'~'ks .... Date
~endod Permit Conditions .'
Permit Application Form, ' ~: r~ank She'ets,
Application to Abmndon tanks(s) . Date
~knfluol Report 'For~s ' -'
Betveen Ovner. & Operator
C~]copy o! Written Contract
C]lnspeetlon Reports .
....:.._.. [:]Cor respond.eric.
i.
l'JCor respondents - Nailed
Unauthorized Release ii.ports
Abandonment/Closure Reports ' ''
mm
· .. Date
l~to
~I'0 Compliance Check
L']#vf Plan Check (May Constructions)
I'lfj?D Plan Check (Ney Coflstructio~n)
f.']NVf Plan Cheek (Existing facility)
S~ Plan Cheek (lxisti~ facility)
'Incomplete Applications Form
~Permlt Appliceti~ Checklist
:Perml t Instruct ions ODiscarded
Tightness To.~ Results
Sampl ing/L&b Reports ..... ; "
Avl compZienGo Check '('New Cons~'l~ctzon 'Che~k'l'l t) ' "
[~]#onltor. ln~ Well ConstruCtiOn
Check! iii)
(Nov Construction
De l~e/P~ ru X' t I "
[~]Bnvironmentel Seneit[.vit¥ Dalai
roundvs~er Drilling, Bortrtg Logs
Location of Wate~ Wells
~Statement or Underground Coflduic8
~Plot Plan featuring All Bn~,lro~entally Sensitive Data
~Pho=o. ~Conacruction Dravings Location:
sheet shoving date recelvedl and tally o[ inspection tim~, '~tc
scellaneous
(
FAC ILI TY
TANK ~NUAL
REPORT
Facility Bakersfield Fire Sta. 1 Permit # 160013c Month/Yr. 1/89
1. I have not done any major modifications to this facility during the
last 12 months. Signature ~,,__-O~A k. ~,~------~
' ':.¥~:::.-- :. -.: .... Note: -CAiI- major modi.fications Jrequire a---Perm!
the Permitting Authority.
2. I have done major modifications for which I obtained Permit(s) to
Construct from Permitting Authority
..... .,~ Signature
Permit to Construct # Date
' : ......... 3. ' Repair and Maintenance Sunmary ........ -.:.:-. . : .... : ..... ..._ ........ ............ ~...~- .................. .~.. ........
Attach a summary of all:
--.Routine and required maintenance done to this facility's tank,
piping, and .monitoring equipment.
-- Repair of Submerged pumps or suction pumps.
-- Replacement of flow-restricting leak detectors with same.
-- Repair/replacement of dispensers, meters', or nozzles.
-- Repair of electronic leak detection components, or replacement
with same.
-- Installation of.ball float valves.
-- Installation or repair of vapor recovery/vent lines.
Include the date of each repair or maintenance activity.
NOTE: All repairs or replacements i:o response to a leak require a
Permit to Construct from the Permitting Authority as do all
other modifications to tanks~, piping or monitoring equipment
not listed here.
Fuel Changes - Allowed for Motor Vehicle Fuel tanks 0nly.
List all fuel storage changes in tanks, noting:
Date(s), tank number(s), new fuel(s) stored.
Inventory control monitoring is required for this facility on the
Permit to Operate, and I have not exceeded any reportable limits as
listed in the appropriate lnvenl:ory control monitoring handbook
during the last twelve months (if not applicable, disregard).
Signature
Trend Analysis Summary
Please attach Annual Trend Analysis Summary for the last 12 periods.
Meter Calibration Check Form
Please attach current, completed Meter Calibration'Check Form
ANNUAL
TREND ~,NALYSI S
S U lVilWJkR y
TANK ~ I TIME PERIOD: . .T~n 1 1988 to n~ 3] lq~g
QUARTER 1 TIME PERIOD: Jan 1 to MAr ql
PERIOD 1: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) ]~
· : :c .:-._ ._ ~ :Action Number for"{hisPeriod-~(Line 4) 20
PERIOD 2:
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for thJ, s Period (Line 4) 37 ''
~PERIOD 3: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 14
- :' Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 54
QUARTER 2
PERIOD 4:
PERIOD 5:
TIME PERIOD: April [ to Jufle 3~
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 3
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 69
Total ~inuses This Period (Line 3) ~6
Action Number for this Period (Line4) 85
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 12
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 10]
PERIOD 6:
QUARTER 3
PERIOD 7:
· PERIOD 8:
PERIOD 9:
TIME PERIOD: July I to Sep~ ~0
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 12
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 117
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 13
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 133
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 18
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 149
QUARTER 4 TIME PERIOD: Oct { to Dec 31
PERIOD 10: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 14
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
PERIOD 11: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 10
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) {80
PERIOD 12: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 15
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 196
I hereby' Certify 'this- ~s-
Siffnature Date
~,NAL¥S I S
S
TANK ¢ ~ TIME PERIOD: . Jan I 1988 to Dec 31 1988
QUARTER 1 TIME PERIOD: Jan I to' Mar 31
PERIOD 1: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 0
--"- :-: ......... "'-'~:Action Number' for-thii~"Period (Line 4.) .~-20
PERIOD 2: Total Minuses This Period (Line 8) 0
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 37
: PERIOD 8: Total Minuses This Period (Line 8) 0
Action Number for, this Period (Line 4) 54
TIME PERIOD: April I to June 30
QUARTER 2
PERIOD 4:
PERIOD 5:
PERIOD
Total Minuses This Pe:~iod (Line 3) O
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Sinuses This Pe:ciod (Line 3) O
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 85
Total Minuses This Pe:~iod (Line 8) Q
Action Number for thi:s Period (Line 4~
QUARTER 3
PERIOD 7:
PERIOD 8:
PERIOD 9:
TIME PERIOD: July 1 to Sept 30
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Pe:~iod (Line 3) O
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 133
Total Minuses This Pe:~iod (Line 3) 0
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 149
QUARTER 4 TIME PERIOD: Oct I to Dec 31
PERIOD 10: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 0
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) 165
PERIOD 11: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 0
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) ]80
PERIOD 12: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3) 0
Action Number for this Period (Line 4) ~96
............ IherebY cer~'if¥ '~hi's i~ a true and ~igcurate report.' ......
Signature Date
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT
D. S. NEEDHAM
-FIRE'CHIEF '·. .... : ' ..... ·
2101 H STREET
BAKERSFIELD, 93301
......... 326-3911
........ ''-'- ":- ".-- 'L£
Bakersfield Fire Station #1
Permit.~__~600.13c
1/88 - 12/88
Repair and Maintenance Summary
Tank 1
Tank tightness test'preformed by' Redwine-Manley'Testing on
2/20/88. Tank tested tight
Replaced fuel filter and nozzle on 19/14/88
Tank 2
Tan,k tightness test preformed by' Redwine-Manley Testing on
2/20/88. Tank failed tightness test' Fuel was removed from
the tank on 2/22/88. This tank has been removed from servi'ce.
Currently plans are under way for the removal of this tank.
Totalizer '
Readings Start (moneVI
C.:L~-~ ' ....
Totalizer
:~ .... Readings
. Product
:...}-.-:.' ...::
Pump
Totelizer
Readin~
Product
Pump
Totalize~
Rladin~
Product
Pump
Totaliz~r
Readings
Product
Pump
Start (gallons}
Return to Storage (gallOnSt Tataiizer Seale~L [ Meter Sealed
Make and Mo~el Serial Number Tagge~.
': Checked
Start (monev) ...: . Sta~ {gallons} .... : ~ '"~- ..:- ' Adjuste~
Return to Stor~e (laUghs) Totalizer Sealed -
MaKe and Moael Serial Numar .Ta~d
I
Sta~ (~neV) Start (gatlonl) Aaiusted { Fast ~Sl~w
Return tO Sterne (~]illOnl} Tolaiizer ~ealed [ Meter ~ale~
0 Yet 0 NO I 0 Yet 0 NO
MaKe and Model Serial Numar Ta~d Tag
Finish (money) Finish (gaUons) ~/ibration:, /Fa'' I S'Ow
Checke~~,,~ as; ~ Slow
Start (monev) Sta~ (gallons) Adjusted
To
Return tO Storage (gallons) Totalizer Seale~ Meter Sealed
Make eno Model ~erial Numar Tagge~ Tag
~Red ~Green ~elue
Finish (money} Finish (gailonsj ~libra~ion: Fast [Slow
Checked
Start (money) Star~ (gallon~) Adjusted F~ Slow
To
Return tO Storage (gallons) Totadizer Seaie~ I Meter Sealed
DY-. ONe I OY- ONo
Maxe an~ MOOel Serial NumOer Tagge~ Tag
grad OGreen OBlue
Finish (money} '~ Finish. (gallons) C~]ib~alion: F~st } Slow
Checked
Start (moneVl Start (gaUonsl Adjusted Fast I Slow
To
Return tO ~tOt~ (gallons} Totalizer Sealed I Meter Sealed
Tripii~te (pink) O~ler Copy
Totalize~
Readings
Oistribulion: Original (white) Invoice Copy
Duplicate (canary) File Copy
C :VALLEY Ir. QuIPME F'COMPANY
(.os) ~2~-;:~;; or Meter Change
TOKHEIM DISTRIBUTORS
Make and MoDel Ser~a~ Number [ Tagged ~ Tag I
ii700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Telephone (805} 861-3636
ENVIRONMEN'I~.L HEALTH DIVISION
':'.,':'UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Leon M Hebertson, M.D. " .... h.~. :.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Retchard .:. ·: :.!. ~ ~ '
...,..,.>,, . ~..-,..? :,: i.~/=': :'..' .;'
-PERMIT$1'60013C
· . ~--XP'I' 1:~.1~-,?~ ':I989
' '" " "'" ':: ~;~%':-:"~"~'~ :'"' '' ':'?'":~':~"~'~':':::~'? ':I ~:,'~.~'," :'~i"' i~':'~':' "
,,.,..21(~1 H ,STREET .' ,-~,::?,.,. ',;.r~ :,...' ,. ,.',;:~,,~t~:,:,~,:~;~:.~,,,. :,,: ..... ¢~,-. ,~.1501 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERS F I ELD ,.. CA .:.~':~:,:?z' ,,;'"~ ~;'~-.~'~,:'~':-' ~,'~.~:~.~: ~' ~9~:' '- ~i'~" .~ e. BAKERSF I ELD
'"; '" ':TANK #
.FD1/D
,~GE(IN YRS} '' " SUBSTANCE CODE
PRESSURIZED PIPING?
-' - .' . '' '~ ~ ...~. .' ' '-.._.'-'::.~ :2%:
: ,'..:;'-:,':':'.',-~?,:.NOTg: .Ar.r. INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE pERMiTtiNG
:: '.': :-?i./':'i'i~'.,:~..:vl :-:.,:':.AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE .TERN 0F THIS PERNIT,~ r~
: 'NON--TRANSFI~-RABLE "' =~ * * :'"'POST "ON :':PR~ISE~ '
1986
AUG S
'DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED:
3 4
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
FUEL INVENTORY RECORDING
TANK ii I CAPACITY 550 GAL
PE~I~ # I~OOO9C,
rE OPENING OPENING CLOSING
GAUGING INVENTORY INVENTORY REDUCTION READINGS
18.5 0.0 190.0 -190.0 II 6793.5
I
5
6
7
8
9
10
il
i3
15
16
1'7
18
19
30
33
3'5
26
37
3i
19.0 190.0
45. 5 198.0
46.0 ~0.0
46.5 550.0
46.5 ~.~0.0
4i.5 550.0
40.8 510.0
40. G 503. 0
40.3 503.0
40.0 498.0
38.0 495.0
38. 2 473, 0
35.5 474, 0
35.5 44i.0
~.5 ~1.0
· 35.5 441.0
~.5 441.0
34.5 44i.0
34.2 4~39.0
34.0 ~.0
3'3.5
33.5 401.0
~.5 401.0~
32.5 401.0
32.5 401,0:I
32.5 401. O~
~.5 401.0:
31.0
31.0 380.0,
$1.0 380.0
I~ONTHLY TOT~G
TREND A~qt. YSIS PERIO0 5
IS THERE R REPORTABLE LGSS t~
INVENTORY CLOSING METER DAILY M~ER TOTAL ~TER
READINGS SALES
6793.5 0.0 II
198.0 -8.0 Il 6S09.7 6753.5 16.~ Il
550.0 ~.0 II 6609.7 6809.7 0.0 II
550.0 0.0 II 6809.7 6809.7 0.0 II
550.0 0.0 {I 6609.7 6b09.7 0.0 II
550.0 0.0 II 6B44.4 6,%9.7 34.7 II
510.0 40.0 Il 6644.4 6~4.4 0.0 II
~3.0 7.0 II 6644.4 6844.4 0.0 II
503.0 0.0 Il 6853.5 6844.4 G.l ii
498.0 5.0 Il 6853.5 £~8Y,~.5 0.0 II
495.0 3.0 Il 6674.5 6{~5~.5 22.0 II
4?3.0 ~3.0 {I 6874.5
474.0 -1.0 Il 6903.5 6874.5 38.0 II
441.0 33.0 Il 6903.5 6903.5 0.0 II
441.0 0.0 II 6903.5 6902.5 0.0
~1.0 0.0 II 6903.5 6902.5 0.0 II
441.0 0,0 II 690~.5 690~.5 0.0 II
441.0 0.0 Il 6935.8 6~2.5 23.3 Il
4~.0 12.0 Il 6935.8 69~5.8 0.0 Il
4~5.0 4.0 II 6~35.8 6925.8 0.0 Il
4~.0 3.0 II 6944.4 69~.6 la. 6 II
81.0 ~1.0 II 6944.4 6944.4 0.0 Il
401.0 0.0 II 69&4.4 6944.4 0.0 II
401.0 0.0 II 6944.4 6944.4 0.0 Il
401.0 0.0 Il 6944.~ 6944.4 0.0 II
40t. O 0.0 II . 69&4.4 694~.4 0.0 Ii
401.0 0.0 il 6944.4 6944.4 0.0 II
401.0 0.0 Il 6967.4 69~4.4 23.0 Il
~0.0 ~1.0 Il 6957.4 ' 6967.4 0.0 II
380.0 0.0 II 6967.4 6t67.4 0.0 II
380.0 0.0 Il 6967.4 6967.4 ~0.0 Il
--6.0 ~NTHLY TOTALS 193.9
TOT~ MINUSES THIS PERIOD
£UMLII. JqTIVE NII~SES FRUM PREVIOUS
PERIODS IN THIS CYCLE
TOTAL MINUSES
ACTION N~,BER FROM IHiS PERIOD
PRODUCT DIESEL '.
READING BEFORE AFTER DELIVERED WATER AI4.GUltT WEEK ToTALs WEEK TOTALG WEEK TOTALS
~JUSTNENT OELIUERY Ii,'~IVERY INVENTOiW GAUGEING (~ER OR SHORT INV. REDUCTION METER THRDUONPUT OVER OR SHORT
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 176.0 550.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
MONTHLY TOTALS
1o
20
0.0
0.0
374.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
374.0 IOTAL
3O
65
190.0
-~3.0
0.0
0.0
34.7
-40.0
-7.0
G. 1
-5.0
19.0
-~. 0
~.0
-33.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
~3.3
-I;'.0
-4.0
iS.G
-31.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0;0
~3.0
-P.I. 0
0.0
~0.0
· ' WEEK I ~ 1
r-IS6.0 50.9
69.0
k'EF~3
19.0
21.0
W~ 4
{~NTI'ILY TOTALS
WEEK 1
186.9
% VARIATION TREND RNALY91$
0
0
I
0
0
WEEK I 0
367,19 I
1
WEB( ~ ~ ~
-10.9 -18.76
WEI~3 WEE~ 3
~.9 54.~
WEEK
2.0
WEE~ 4 0
8.70 0
1
411.78
TANK
FACI LITY ANNUAL
FacllityBa~er~fi~ld Fire Sra. 1 Permit # 160013C Month/Yr. 3/87
4.
I have not done any major modifications_to this facility'during the
last 12 months. ~~ ~_,~
Note: All major modifications ~equire a Permit ~o Construc~ from
the Permitting Authority.
I have done major modifications for which I obtained Permit(s) to
Construct from Permitting Authority
Signature
Permit to Construct
Repair and Maintenance Summary
Attach a summary of all: ..
-- Routine and required maintenance done to this facility's tank,
piping, and .monitoring equipment.
-- Repair of submerged pumps or suction pumps.
-- Replacement of flow-restricting leak detectors with same.
-- Repair/replacement of dispensers, meters', or nozzles.
-- Repair of electro~ic' leak detection componentk, or replacement
with same.
-- Installation of ball float valves.
-- Installation or repair of vapor recovery/vent lines.
Include the date of each repair or maintenance activity.
NOTE: All repairs or replacements in response to a l~ak require a
Permit to Construct from the Permitting Authority as do all
other modifications to ta:~ks, piping or monitoring equipment
not listed here.
Fuel Changes - Allowed for Motor Vehicle Fuel tanks 0nly.
List all fuel storage changes in tanks: noting:
Date(s), tank number(s), new fuel(s) stored.
8. Inventory control monitoring is'required for this facility on the
Permit to Operate, and I have n_o_%t exceeded any reportable limits as
........ .:.,...,..:.:.: :....t:isted.?'in..:the.~..appropriat~,':tnve~'bry,'COntrol mdnitdrin~-~andb~0~ ...... .~ ..-.~..~......-..-..
during the last twelve months (if not applicable, disregard).
Signature
6. Trend'Analysis Summary'
Please attach Annual Trend Analysis Summary for the last 12 Peri.ods. ....
......... ?.'~-~g~er Calib~ati0~ Check'Fo~m
Please attach current, completed Meter Calibration Check Form
FIRE DEPARTMENT
D,S. NEEDHAM
·-FIRE CHIEF .-
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
2101 H STREET
BAKERSFILED, 93301
.. ..3_26-3911- .~- .~ .... :--
Bakersfield Fire :Station #1
'~ermit # 160013C
3/87 - 3/88
Repair and Maintenance Summary
No repairs or modifications were made to this facility
Date/Time
c] I0
Hose or
Pump #
Note: :.
O~vner or Operator Signature I) ('~ .?v~.~__- .
Device Repairman
Used for
Date of
Calibration
Ca!!bra~!m~
Calibrator's Signature
SUBHIT A COPY OF THIS FORM ~/ITR'ANNUAL REPO. RT.
Registration #
Tank #/ Fast Flow Slow' Flow' Volume Returne~
Product 5-Oallon Draft 5-Oallon Draft to Storage
1. All meters must have calibration checks a minimm of twice a'year which may
~ lncl. ude cheers done by tile Department bf Weights and Measures.
2, llefore starting calibration runs wet the calibration can with' product and
return product to storage.
3. Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open Into the 'can. Note gallons and cubic
: Inches drawn,.iand.return product to storage.
4. Run 5 gallons wtth the nozzle one-half open Into the can. Note gallons and
,, cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage.
S. After all product for one calibration cheek Is returned to stornge remember
[ to record the volume returned to storage In column 9 of the Inventory
Recording Sheet.
6 If the volume measured tn a §-galIon calibration can is more than 6 cubic
~' Inches above .or below the B-gallon mark, the meter requires calibration by a
~ registered device.., . repairman.
ICallbrationI
Required?
Yes I'
KERN OUNTY HE~kLTH DE~"ARTMENT
VARIAT. I ON/LOSS IN~JESTI GATI ON REPORT
Facility: Bakersfield Fire Dept. Sra. #1. Permit ~ 160015C
Facility Address: 2101 H st.
Tank(s) with Discrepancy: ~ 1 Date/Time of Discovery: 2/27/89 at 08$0hrs
Name of Person Filing Report: John Patterson
INVESTIGATION SUMMARY
The following procedures must be performed Within the specified times starting at the
time a reportable loss is discovered or should have been discovered:
6 Hours Owner/Operator or other quail:fled person is to { Date I Time
review'records for errors before determining [ 2/27/89 10850 hfs
there is a reportable variation/loss.
Performed By: John Pattirson
24 Hours 1) Owner/Operator must verbally report [ Date I Time
discovery to KCHD and follow-up with written [ 2/27/89 Ii100 hfs
notification on form provided.
Performed By: John.Patterson
2) Visual facility check to be performed using { Date [ Time
' checklist on the back of this, form. [ 2/27/89 [1050 hfs
Performed By: John Pat, terson
8) All product dispensers are to be checked for I Date I Time
calibration, and adjusted if out of tolerance.
Performed By: Dispensers not tested
48 Hours Piping to be leak tested using approved method.I Date { Time
Contractor's Name Piping not tested
License · .Test Performer's Name
Description of test performed
· * ATTACH COPY OF TEST RESULTS. * *
72 Hours Tightness Testing of tank(s) to be performe~ [ Date I Time
using approved tester and method.
Contractor's Name Tank not tested
License ~ '. Test Performer's Name
...... Description of res't-perfo'rm~'d
· * ATTACH COPY OF TEST RESULTS. * *
NOTE: THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY WITHIN 5 DAYS OF
COMPLETION OF INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES.
2. VISUAL INSPECTION CHEC} 'iST
A. Dispensers'
X All dispensers and their end doors visually checked for leaks.
'~- All hoses and nozzles visually checked for leaks.
'X-All totalizer seals checked for tampering.
Results:
-- All dispensers appear tight
/ signature/date
~. 7£~.=_'i' - .2 5-~.: 'u - ' "~!l~=fr~---£~f~i~l~ ~7 '7~'~
-- Dispenser(s) not tight as listed below
signature/date
{DISPENSER ~{ SERIAL # { COMMENTS
B. Tauk Area ............. ..,,~
All 'turbine boxes
~'All fills and vapor.
Results:
-- Tank area appears
present.
tight w~h no product or liquid
, signature/date
-- Tank area ~oes not appear tight because of the problems/
conditions listed below.
signature/date
{TANK ~}PRODUCT{COMMENTS/RESULTS:
I t I
{ I I
T e "~;' · .... "~ ..... ~]Suction
C. Piping yp :;,;~\,.,,...~'.., .... C~Pressure
Pressurized piping 'leak detector(s) tested .for proper functioning
and for detection of leakage.
Suction piping tested for indication of leakage.
Results:
--Piping tight based on test(s) above.
signature/date
-- Piping not tight based on test(s) above, with problems/
............... conditions listed-below.-
signature/date
Description Piping
24
REPORTABLE VARI ATI ON/LOSS
NOTIF][ CATION
Kern County Health Department
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 9S305
Attn: Underground Tank Section
..... Fac£1itY:-'Bakersfield -Fire -Dept.~,._.Sta !~1 ....... -'~-Permit ~:':-' i~60'OtZC----'--~== ........ = ..... . ......
Facility Address: 2101 H st. ",..:.iii
Name Of Person Filing Report: John Patter_~on
' .... .'~ i:/ :i -"~ 9:, -"~' '"--"~'- ~
I':""! ., ' ' '
On 2/2~../89 at 0800 hfs ~..'
inven%ory
· ('date' ~nd ·time)
...... "' , 'the above facility had an
variatiori/j!'o, sa ~that.:..exceeded reportable limits as described below:
Amount of Amount of Amount of
'Tank · Daily Weekly, Monthly
Variation/Loss Variation/Loss .¥priation/Loss
1 122 gals ~"t.':i: "' ': !" :-
Total'Minuses
Line-3 of
Trend Analysis
I have stopped dispensing product and begun investigation procedures required by
the Permitting Authority.
This notification is in addition to the phone call I previously placed.
Signature
24 HOUR
RE PO RT.~I~ I'. E
V.~I:{I ATI ON/LOSS
NOTIFI CATION
TO:
Kern County Health Department
1700 ~lower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Attn: Underground Tank Section
'Facility: Bakers£ield Fire Dept.S Sra.:#1 .....
Facility Address: 2101 H st
Name Of Person Filin~ Report:
2/25/89' at 0800 hfs '
('date and time)
160013C
the above facility had an
lnven.tory variation/loss that exceeded reportable limits as described below:
Amount of Amount of .~' Amount" Of
'Tank · Daily Weekly ~ Monthly
Variation/Loss Variation/Loss Variation/Loss
1 362 ~als
Total Minuses
Line.3 of
Trend Analysis
I have stopped dispensing product and begun investigation procedures required by
the Permitting Authority.
This notification is in addition to the phone call I previously placed.
Signature
~?0O~e,S~,.t KERN COUNTY HIEALTH DEPA HEALTH OFFICER
Bakemfleld, California 93305 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Leon M Hebel'tlon, M.D.
Telephone (805)861-3636 .. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Date--..~'~ -- ,-. ,/2E- ~~ _ ~" ' ', undergroUnd Tank FaCilit9 ~'
Firm Name ~~,,/~ ~ ~Yr~'~/ . EPA ID ~ ' . : '-:~'- '
Address ~/¢/ ~ ~ ..... . . Assessors Parcel ~
Person Inte~iewed
.v~lC. OF V,OLATIvN AND O DER TO COMPLY '.
The following conditions or practices obse~ed this date are violations of one or more sections of the California Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage,
handling, transpo~ation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8, "Underground
Storage of Hazardous Substances." ' .... : .....
Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below:
/ . . . /, ~.~
Your signature ac~now~eoges receip~ o~ a copy ot this report and collectioMf any samples describe~ above, and is
not an admission of guilt.
"Failure to~!lly comply'/w, ff~h this "Notice and Order"'may reSult in further Legal action,by Countyor State officials: .....
- Agent o~ the Ke~n P,~u-nty Hea~th Officer
Owner or At~thorized Representative
w,,,._.,,,..,
Canary --//Facility file
Pink -- Specialist
Environmental Healtfl 580 4113 120 (7/87)
III",I'IIllTING AGENg¥~ - I IIEt'OllTLUG PERSON --
(3t.,~UI"IT'V' IIAZAI:IDL~I)':'~ T~A~..;'['I~. t I',]C~ DIgNT
7. IP:
DATE AND TI~4E UF KNOlibEDGE OF DISCIIARGE OR TIIREATENEU DISUHAR{;
SEC T R
(RURAL I,UCATIONS OBL',
.... DDA ..,.--m l . - ~-, ..... .'..~ .... ~ --] I'ROPBRTY OHHF~R '
" ' I~ · ° .... - ' -~- 7-. L .... · , ' ..... -
NAME AND AUURE96 oF t'AR'l'¥ RESPOBSiilLg Eot DISClIARUE, LF~ I(~lO~B: / · ~ ~- .~-~.
. · . / / 7/ . . 8't~.7d~.7 .-
--~i}E.~-~F_.E _ z [sCr~E ~'v~e: ' / ' ~ - '
' ~-_~..~-fi-t~STrlAh 04 rural, In,ri. ~ ~R IIWY 05 V I'IIOGIC STRIJCTURR OB OTIIER WATEr ~i,b
. 02~COHHERCIAG 05 ' ~ILO bABUS 02 COUNTY RD 06' PRIVATE STRUCTURE I0 A/RPORT/RAIGYARD 14 DESERT
03 RESIDENTIAL 03 ' "CITY RD 07' CA~AL/WATERIVAY { { ENPTY LOT 15 DRUSIILAND
' 99--OTJlKII:SPKCIFY { 04 PRIVATE RD 08' IJOMESTIC WATER ~LL 12 LA, E/POND lO OILFIELO
~UR[~ p~ 13E~S~ / C IRCUNSTANCI~S OF RELEASE CAUSE OF RELEASE
Ol.~Oll, REPINI(ItY t)l~llll,g Ill(lNG HANUFAI:'I'URI~U /I__IiURINO i;ONTAINER O1 EQUIl'BENT FAILURE
02~CIIEH. MANUFACTIJRER O2~HIllLE IN STORAOE UR CUNUUIT REPAIR U2 VANDALISH
03__RISC. FIXED FACILITY 03 IIURING NORFIAL END USE ]2 J[,LEOAL DiSPOSAl, 03 AL~ OF NA'I'UR~
O~_~MOTOR VEHICLE 0.1 HlliLE BEING I,OAi}ED 9e TIIREA'I'~NED RELEASE 04~UIDENT
lin 'I'~AIN . 05 WIII{,E IN TRANSIT ONLY; NO DISUI{AllGE 05~LLEOAL DISPOSAL
O0~RCRAFT OG WIIILE VE{IIC[,E PARKRO 97 RELEASE OR INCIDENT 98~UKKNOWN
o7~II'EI, IRE 07 OUR{Hi{ VEIIIUi. E ACCIIJENT HI'i'I(;ATE{I AT TIHE 99
O8~UNliERGROUNIJ TANK O8 fiURIHG FIRE/EXPL. OF REI'UI{T
LIST TIlE ONE. fifo OR TIIREE MOST SIG~iFICANT SUHSTANCES I)ISCIIAROE~ OR TIIREATEIIEO TO BE DISCHARGED:
C{IEH. N~HE/MAJOR~IPU~NT: ~ CU~CE~TIIATiO~ A~OU~T AT RISK AHOU~T RELEASED
r~ac'r~w currusJv~ ~mx ~LiU. [2J~ ~ 121~ ~
raumact[v~ } ~aST~ oas l~J~ _ l~J~ _ [~J
.................... ~_~_.~_~ .....................
C{IEH. NAHE/~JUR CUHPUHEHT: I~IPURTAHT AUUITIUHAL UUH~ENTS/UETAiLS: {USE REVERSE iF N~UESSA
(iOf, lFlOB NANE:
[2] IlAZhRO: TOXIC F l,,%:t,:tAD L E { FLEE SOLID
--REACTIVE --CORROSIVE
1 OACTI V~ I ~VAS'I'E--GAS
UOT lo ~b~nF.r:
.................... ~_~_~_~ .....................
CREH. NAHE/~JOR Co~IPUNENT:
3 ~ HAZARD: lOX I C FI,AHRAIILE
I'URE
SOL
1
~NEAC'I' l VE ~ CORROSIVE gad l OACT l V~ .....
IHDJCATE ACTUAL {"A"} OR {'{ITEN'I'IAL
FOR APFLiUABLE ITEN8
OILER I CIIEH
Ill__AIR
O2~CANAI,/WATERIVAV
O3~LAKE/PONU
04 ~,':;0 ! I,
OS CROPS
¢H1~!, [VESTOCK
07~I, III, DLIFE
og~OESERT
j 0 , IIRUSII/.ABI~
I i ___FOODSTUFFS
! 2.~nNnl/HOIVATEr
13~DHELL
{ 4 ..
99~OTI{ER:
FfiRH mIIH~TP- {30
IRTEItNAL US{"- UNL¥:
IUENT I1"I CAll 0N ~
INVESTIGATION REFERRAt. HADE TO:
IIEALTll RISE ASSESSHENT RANKING:
iNFORMATION PHONED-iN? Y N IF YES. DATE
TAKEN BY:
CATE REPORT RECEIVED I1¥ IIEALTll IJEPARTI4ENT
COHI'UTER [BI'UT (CHECK) CLERK'S INITIALS
DATI", OF ~OTIFICATION OF HEALTH OFFICER llOS
UAI'E OF BO'FIFICATION OF HEDIA
1700 Flower Street
· Bakersfield, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Dear Tank Owner or Operator:
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon ~ Reichard
Re: Permit Checklist
......... ---~-..---'l. iL..Z&~?~--~_d .
' This department has received the information you were
requested to return from your Standard Inventory Control Per,it
Packet.
........................... ~e-'f0'i'f~-~i~g ~eguired items l~ere not included:
~/Lacking notation of havin; required eguipment (see below)
FSauging Instrument
triker Plate
[-]Water-finding Paste
If any of the above are checked an equipment supplier list
will be enclosed with this letter
[_-]Agreement between owner and operator (se~ attached if
checked)
Comments: '
king Tank Calibration Chart(s) ~e~_~.~ C~,f/ '~~
~Lacking ~eter Call~ration Check(s)
Comments:
Please submit the necessary information checked above within
14 days. Another permit checklist has been included for your
convenience.
if you have any questions or are having a prob/em acquiring
necessary equipment or services please call me at (805) 861-
3636.
Sincerely,
Bill Scheide
fnvirom~ental Health Specialist
Hazardous ~laterials ~anagement Program
HMMP - 500
DISTRICT OFFICES
Lake Isabella Moiave Ridqecrest Sh,3fter . Taft
DEPl'H i(IN.) VOLUME
0.2S0
0. 500
0. 750
1. 000
!. 250
1. 500
1. 750
2. 000
2. 250
2. 500
2. 750
3. 000
3. 250
3. 500
3. 750
4. 000
4. 250
4. 500
4. 750
5. 000
5. 250
5. 500
5. 750
6. 000
6. 250
G. 500
G. 75,D
7. 000
7. 2519
7. 500
7. 750
8. 000
8. 250
8. 500
8. 750
9. 2519
9. 500
9. 750
10. 000
10.25,9
.... 10. 500
10. 750
11. 000
I 1. 250
11. 500
! 1. 750
12. 000
12. 250
12.50.0
! 2. 750
13. 000
13. 250
1 3. 500
13. 750
I','l ¢~ E~ a r 'b h 5/ -r a r, k ~,
Customer name: CISY .I]F BAKERSFIELD
HORIZONTAL.TANK---(RND)--- 45.5 IN. DIA. X
~' HEAD DEP':I'H .... .75 IN.
{GAL. ) DEPTH (IN. ) VOLUME (GAL. )
0.40
2.05
3,15
5.77
7.26
e. e6
12.33
24.71
27.0i'
29.38
31.80
34.' R8
36.82
39.41
42.05
4 4. '75
47.48
50.27
55.98
61.85
64.85
67.89
70.96
74-. 07
77.22
80.40
83. G1
86.86
90. 13
93.44
96.78
100. 15
103.55
106.97
113.89
117.39
J. 20. ga
124.47
12,9.04
135· 25
142.54
14.000 } 149.91
14. 250 153.63
14. 500 15'7.36
14. 750 161. 11
15. 000 164.87
15. 250 168.65
15. 500 17;F_'. 45
15. 750 176.26
16. 850 183.93
16. 500 187.78
16. 750 191.64
17. 000 195.52
17. 250 199.41
17. 500 203.31
17. 750 207.22
18. 000 211. 14
18. 250 215.07
18.5~0 219.01
18. 750 222.95
19. 000 226.91
19. 250 230.87
19. 500 234.84
19. 750 238.81
20. 000 242.80
20. ~50 246.78
20. 500 250.77
20. 750 254.77
2i. 000 258.77
21. 250 262.77
21. 500 266.78
21. 750 270.79
22. 000 274.80
22. 250 278.81
;BS:. 500 282.82
.... ' 750 286.83
23. 000 290.85
23. 250 294.86
23. 500 298.07
23. 750 302.88
24. 000 306.89
24. 250 310.9.0
24. 500 314. DO
e..~' ~.~. 750 318.90
25. 000 322.8~
25. 250 326.88
25. 500 330.87
25. 750 334.85
26. 000 338.83
2~. 250 342.80
26. 500 34~. 76
26. 750 350.71
27. 000 354.66
27. 250 358.60
27. 500 362.53
27. 750. 366.45
28. 000 370.36
28. 250 374.26
28. 500 378. 15
28. 750 382.02
29. 000 385.89
89. 850 389.74
29. 500 3~3.58
29. 750 397.41
30. 000 401.22
80 IN. SHELL LENGIH
DEPTH (IN.)
Total
30. 500
30. 750
31. 000
3 l l 251~
31. 500
31. 750
32. 000
32. 250
3;3. 500
32. 750
33. 000
33. 250
33. 500
33. 750
34. 25'9
34. 500
34. 750
35. 000
35. 250
35. 500
35. 750
36. 000
36. 250
36. 500
36. 750
37.00~ZI
3'7. 250
37. 500
37. 750
38. 000
38. 250
38. 500
38. 750
39. 000
39. 250
39. 500
39. 750
40. 000
40. 250
40. 500
.40. 750
41. 000
41 · 250
41. 500
41. 750
42. 000
42. 250
42. 500
42. 750
43. 000
43. 250
43. 500
43. 750
44. 000
44. 250
44. 500
44. 750
45. 000
45. 250
45. 500
Vol Llrlll~ ----
VOLUME (GAL.
408.79
412.56
.416.31
420.04
423.75 ,
427.45
431. 12
434.78
438.42
442.03
445.63
44~. 20
452.75
45~. 27
459.77
4~3.25
4B6.70
470. 12
473.52
47~. 88
480.22
483.53
48~. 81
493.27
4~. 45
4~. 60
502.71
505.78
508.82
~14.77
517. G~
520.5~
523.4.0
D2B. 1
528.92
531.61
534.
53~. 84
53~. 38
541.8~
544.2g
548, ~6
551.20
553.37
555.48
557.51
55~. 4~
5~ 1.33
5~3. 12
5~4.81
56~. 4
5~7.8~
56~. 27
570.
571.
572.55
573.27
573.67
573.67 Gallo~,
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
FUEL INVENTORY RECORDIN6
STRTION I I~RY 1~9 TP~K ! I c,,.q~ClTf: ~o0 ~
I 3 4 § 14 & 7 8
~TE OPENI~ (IOENIk6 CLI~IN6 IIf~fORY CLOSIN6 ~'TER ~ILY
~I~ I~ I~ ~I~ ~I~ ~I~
I ~ 47~0 ~I.I ~.9 Il ~0 ~i[O ~.0
4 ~.~ ~.9 ~.7 -~9 II ~6 ~.G 0.0
7 ~.~ ~1,~ ~.9 70.~ II ~7 ~.0 ~7
~ ~ ~.9 ~.9 ~.0 tl ~0 ~7 ~.7
9 ~ ~.9 ~.9 ~.0 II ~1.0 ~0 ~.0
lO ~.~ ~.9 ~.9 -~0 II ~11.7 ~i.O 10.7
11 ~ ~.9 ~8 ~1 ii ~11.7 ~i1.7 0.0
1~ ~ ~8 ~8 0.0 II ~il.7 ~11.7 0.0
13 ~ ~8 ~8 0,0 II ~11.7 ~11,7 ' 0.0
14 ~ ~8 ~4,8 ~0 II ~1,0 ~11.7 9.3
16 19.~ ~.9 ~9 4.0 Il ~.R ~ -1,0
17 19,~ ~9 ~9 0,0 II
IR 19.~ ~9 ~7,2 19.7 II ~9.0 ~1.6 17.4
~ 17.~ ~7.~ ~7.~ 0.0 Il ~.0 ~.4 ~.4
~ 17.~ ~,3 191.6 11.7 II ~9 ~.8 1~1
~ 1~ 191.6 1~9 ~7 II ~9 ~9 0.0
~8 147.1 II
:~4 16. ~ 183. 9
PRODUCT: DIESEL
~ERMXT # 160013C
9 lO 11 IZ 13 16 14 t5 t6
II ~ 0.0
II ~0,0
It 0.0
II 0.0
II {i 0,0
II ~ . 0o0
Il L~ 0.0
II ~" 0.0
II )~ 0.0
II ~- 0.0
II ~ 0,0
II ~ (LO
II 0~0
II 0.0
It 0.0
II 0.0
II 0,0
II 0,0
II 0.0
II 0.0
II
II 191.6
36.8 ~.3 ~-5 II 30630.7 30630.7 0.0 II
..~.3 ~7-.. 0 7. ~-11--~.-7 ' '0~. 0 II
~'7.0 E'/.0 0.0 il 30630.7 30630.7 0.0 II
~l;o----E'fiO 0.0 ii--~o3017---30630:y 0.0 Il
PI~Y 'fl~TALS ~04. 0
~ MqI. YSIS PERIOD I~
1S T)T~E g RS:~RTP,~LE LO~ NO
TOT~. MlktJ~ES T~IS PERIOD
CtMJ.ATIVE XII'~JSES FRO( PREVIOU~
PERIODS IN TNI$ CYCLE
TOT~ Nll~d~ES
PCTI(~ tt~iR FI~M l~lS P~I~
IENTHLY 1'01'~S
13
' II
~4
37
3~.0 TOTAL -491.3 MON~.Y TOTALS -IL~7.97
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
FUEL INVENTORY RECORDING
9T{{TI~ i FEI)U~RY 1909
T{~K ! I O~CITY: ~0
7 6
I 3~:~ 476.0 431,1
( 2 3~,00 ~l,l 389,7 41,4
. . =. :=___3_.=~9,:~ .._389,7 .... 38~9 ~ 3.9
4 ~9.00 385,<] 389.7
5 ~9. L~ 389.7 385.9 3.9
7 ~.~ ~1.2 ~.9 70.4
8 ~.~ ~.9 ~.9 ~,O II
10 ~ ~.9 ~.9 -~0 II
12 ~,~ ~8 ~8 0.0 II
13 ~ ~8 ~8 0.0
14 ~ ~8 ~4.8 ~0 II
t~ 19.~ ~.9 ~9
17 19,~ ~9 ~9 0,0 II
19 17.~ ~7.~ ~7.2 0.0
~1 17.~ ~7.2 ~,3 ~9 Il
~ 1~ 191,6 1~9
~4 16.~ 1~9 ~8 147,1 II
~ ~.~ ~,0 0.0 ~.0
PROI)U~T: DIE9~.
9 10
MGWT}{.Y TOTPL9
TREM) {~tqLYSlS P(SlI~ 2
IS 'IIERE A RBW)~tTAI)LE L09S
/
PERMIT # 160013C
11 12 13 16 14 15 16
IE~BINO l{il~ {)k"'TTR {~8_I'~ Wi~R i~OLMT }~ 'i'OTi~LS {{~X TOT;~LS I~ TOT~i.9 ~[ Vi~I{:iTIOW TRI~ P~qLYSlS
RO, IU~i'ABdT 08.IVBW 1{8.IVBW If, REXTI)~ G~UGEIN60VB{ 0{{ SI4G~T INV. 88X{CTIGW {ETER ~ Ok'Bi OR ~
~03~0 30,]18.0 44.0 Il
3~6 3~0 ~.& l{
30405,6, 304~6 0.0 Il - .~ .-
3~.6 .... 3~6 0.0 il
~1~0 ~6 64 Il
~,O ~1~0 ~0 II
~7 ~.0 ~7 I{
~0 ~7 ~.7 Ii
~1,0 ~.0 ~,0 Il
~11.7 ~1.0 10,7 Il
~11.7 ~11.7 ~0 l{
~11.7 ~11,7 O,O II
~11,7 ~11,7 0.0 Ii
~l.O ~11.7 9.3 II
~2 ~1.0 ~ Il
~2 ~2 -1.0 Ii
~1.6 ~2 ~4 Il
~9.0 ~i.6 17.4 I{
~.4 ~.0 1.4 l{
~.0 ~.4 ~.4 Il
~9 ~9 0,0 It
~.7 ~9 24.8 l{
~,7 ~.7 0.0 II
~.7 ~.7 0.0 II
0.0 ~.7 -~.7 II
0.0 0.0 II
-30.]18. 0
831.0
NO
T1)T~ Mliilg~I{ ll(IS P~RI~D
Q.m{q{LATI~ MINOgE9 FROg P{~t'VIOUS
PERIO09 IN l){IS CYCUE
TOTPL M l{ki{6E9
~ 0.0 3.9
0.0 &6
i~,~ 0.0 60,3 k~R I MEER I ~ I ~ 1
.'~2'~ 0.0 -64.6 Pk~.l 144.7 -0.4
0.0 3.3
0,0 -1.0
'~' 0.0 ~6,7
'~ 0.0 -48,1
~ 0.0 0.0
-~. 0.0 0.0 ~ :~ ~ 2 k~ 2 Ml~ R
~ 0.0 1.3 ,~61 58,3 ~:~ 3.83
j 0.0 1.3
0.0 -"--0
~ 0,0 6.4
0.0 -~,3
0,0 1.4
0.0 ~.4 k~3 k~3 k~3
0.0 -i.l 71.5 71.8 0.3
0.0 1.4
191.6 ,9~6. 7 3~5.0
0.0 -1~..3
0.0 -~..5
0.0 -7,3
0.0 -~06b-7.7 ~ 4 ~ 4 ~ 4
0,0 0.0 ~8.3 -3059~. 8 -31151. l 101.83
M]WI~.Y ]'OT~S 35~0 U]]'~ -31149.0 WI~Y T~]'~L9 105.78
14
11
37
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
FUEL INVENTORY RECORDING
1989 T{~( ti I 01uACIIY: ~0 8~
i 5 1~ & 7 8
0{~{I~ ill, IN6 INVi~q'§~ O_OSIN6 MLrr~R DAILY ~ TDT~ {~'TER
Ik'l~l)RY IN~&qY IEl)U~Illt ;ERI)IM~ RF. AI)IN~9 ~
~8.9 ~8.9 0.0 II 29848.7 E9848. 7
PR01]U6T: DIE98.
9 10 1!
PERMIT # 160013C
1~ 13 16 14 15 16
0,0 ii ; 0,0 ~0
~98,9 ~98.9 0.0 Il ~]81/L7 ~8~L7 0.0 Il
~98,9 ~98,9 ~.0 Il ~9848,7 ,~8~8.7 ....~-0.0 Il
.... -'~9 -'~9" 0.0 Il .... ~8 ~.7 0.1 Il
~9 ~9 0,0 Il ~8 ~8 0,0 II
~9 ~4,8 24.1 Il ~7~4 ~8 24,6 II
~4.8 ~8 1~0 II ~,5 ~4 1~1 Il .
~G ~8 ~0 II ~,5 ~.5 0.0 II
~8 ~.8 &O II ~,5 ~.5 10.0 Il
~,8 ~8 I~0 II ~10,6 ~,5 ILl Il
~8 a19.0 19,8 il ~9 ~10.6 IL3 J{
~19,0 ~19.0 0.0 Il ~0 ~9 ~9 II
219,0 ~.~ 41,6 II ~9,5 ~0 41,5 Il
~.5 ~8 ~7 II ~0.0 ~9.5 0,5 ii
~8 ~8 O.O II ~0,6 ~0.0 0,6 Il
~8 ~0 1~7 l{ ~0 ~0.6 ali Ii
~0 ~0 0.0 II ~8 ~0 0.8 II
~0 ~1 ~.111 ~8 ~8 0.0 II
~1 ~1,~ ~9 Il ~,3 ~8 ~,5 Il
~1,2 ~0.~ ~,9 II ~ ~3 ~.9 Il
~0.~ ~5 7.8 11 ~,0 ~.~ ~.~ 11
~5 ~.9 ~6 Il ~ ~2 ~a Il
~,9 ~9 ~0 II ~.~ ~ ~0
~9 ~8 ~.1 II ~1~1 ~.~ ~7 ii
~,8 ~8 0,0 II ~1~5 ~1~5 0,0 Il
~8 1~.4 81.4 Il ~,1 ~1~,5 81.6 Il
1~5 11~ ~.~ II ~.~ ~.a ~.7 II
N(]N]TLY TOTALS 469. 4 NON]Ni.Y TOTALS 469.3
TRE~) {~ILYSI9 PERI~ I
19 TTER[ Il RE{W]RTA~LE LOG9 NO
~ ~? 0,0 0.0
0.0 0.0
:-~'~' 0,0 0.0
0,0 -0.9
0.0 "0,9
. ' 0.0 0.6
0.0
i 0.0
0,0 0.1
0.0 "4.4
0.0 9,0
0.0 -&O
0.0 4.1
0.0
0.0 0,0
0.0
0.0 ?.,4
0,0 0.0
0.0 0.~
0.0 3,3
0,0 0,!
96.8 .t83. 3 396.5
liGNFlLY TOTLq 546.5 TOTAL. -0.1
TOTPL MI~ THIS P~]{IO~
CtIqUCATIUE Mlf, IJg~S FRI]W PREVIOU9
P~IOI)9 IN THIS CYO. E
TOT{IL Ml~
A~TI~ NIJ~I{E~ F~I]~I THIS P~I~
O
0
0
0
40.1 40.8 0.7 1.~ 0
0
0
'1
~0 ~,5 ~,5 ~61 1
0
0
~3 ~3 ~3 ~3 0
0
t
0
0
0
0
NONT~.Y TOTALS
PERMIT ClIECKLIST
Facility C~'~ ~'F~" _~,~-. ( Permit
This checklist is provided to. ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received
~nd that the Permtttee has obtained all necess{ary equipment to implement the first phase of
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided
within 30 days of receipt. - ......... ~ ....... ~ ...... . ._ ....... ~__ ...... ~ ........ ~._.~ ...... .:--=~'~=~:
Check:
Yes
No
A'.~ The packet I received contained:
-1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase I I~terim Permit
...... ':--Monitoring -Requirements, .Information Sheet. (.Agreement .... Between __.Owner __and
Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-3941), Expla~ation of Substance Codes,
Equipment Lists and Return Envelope.
2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook tUT-10.
3) The Following Forms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet
b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse ~
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
4) An Action Chart (to post at factlity)~
B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit,, Phase I Monitoring
Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and
find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and
address, substance codes, and mu;abet of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the 'back side of this sheet).
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page-6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)"tn tank(s)
3) Water-finding paste
D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to
Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the o~ner of this
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a ~opy of agreement between
owner and operator). ..
E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart ~ill suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed on permit).
As, required on page 6 of Handbook tUT-I~, all meters at this facility'have had
calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered
device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook).
O. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance
with procedures described in Handbook #UT-lO.
· · Date, Started '
Signature of Person Completing Checklist: ~ ~._
Date: . ~-,.i(-- ~
PERMIT CHECKLIST
Permit , /{.- CC /'"-"-,C
This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received
.~nd that the Permittee has obtained all nece:ssary equipment to implement the first phase of
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to, KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided
· within 30 d~ys of.receipt .....
Check:
Yes No
A! The packet I received contained:
~ 1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim
........ ' ....... - .... - ................... Monitoring ~equirements, .Information
Permit, Phase I Interim Permit
. .Shes% ...... (~greement Between Owner and
Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-S941), Explanation ...... Of Substance~ Codes;
Equipment Lists and Return Envelope.
2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10.
S) The Following Forms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet
b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
4) An Action Chart (to post at facility)
B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring
· Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and
find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and
address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet).
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable'gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s)
3) Water-finding paste
D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to
Agreements between' Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between
owner and operator).
E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed on permit).
F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have had
calibration checks within the last SO'days and were calibrated by a registered
device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"~eter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook).
with procedures described in Handbook #UT-10.
.............. - Date .Started ~'oQ, O--~ . .(~~_~ _~___
Signature o£ Person Com~letin~ Checklist: J~~~.~-~
G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance
;' t.; 111~ G 1(~ /,'Ol(lq
Fai~llltY:
NQte:
METER CALIBI~./dION
Permit #
1.i' All meters must have calibration checks a minimum of twice a year., which may
i Include checks done by the Department. of Weights and Neasures.
2. ~. Before starting calibration runs, wet the calibration can with. Product and
"return product~ to storage.
3,1 Run 5 gallon8 with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gallons and oubl~
~. Inches drawn, 8nd return produot to storage.
4. Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open into the can. Note. gallons and
!.
, cublo Inches drawn, and return product tO storage.
§..~ After all produot for one oaltbration check is returned to storage,' remember
to record the volume returned to storage In column 9 of tile Inventory
~ Recording Sheet..
S.' If the volume measured in a §-gallon calibration can is more than 6 cubio
i! inches above or below tile fi-gallon mark, the meter requires calibration by a
registered device repairman.
Date/Time
Hose or
Tank
Product
Fast Flow
5-Gallon Draft
Cu." Inches
'5
-.~.
ONner or oPeratOr Signature
SIoN Flow
6-Oallon Draft
0 Cu. lnche8
Volume Returned
to Storage
.Calibrator's 81gnature
Calibration
Required7
oaiions '
-'/crv,--,...,,
,qIII~t4IT A COPY OF Tills FORN {~ITI! ANNUAL REPORT.
Registration # ,
Device Repsirman
Used for
Date of
Calibration
Kern County [lealth Del~artmen~
Division o~ Enviro~nental Hea~m
1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA
93305
Permit
Application
''APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Type of Application (check):
[-[Ne--~ FaCility '[]Modification 'of Facility ~Existirg Facility. [']Transfer of Ownership
A. lgmergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): DayS~,~/f}/~</~/,/~ig~
_ Nights ~,x?x~(/~f/~,~f~..-
'- '-:-Facility Name jZ~/~_/.~,'~/,~'./~,~--~'/~ .~:~,'~Y~,';/~'~/ .............. iNo,.._Of Tank~
Type of Business (¢b'eck): [:]Gasoline station ~Oth'6r "(describe)'~,~' :<~,::~:~-h~-~:~-
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [:]Yes
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for ~ricultural .Pu/poses? [:]Ye-- ~o
Facility Address ?/Q~ //_~r~ ~-F~.~<Jf~./. Nea_re.st. Cross St,
T ' ,' R ' 'SEC ': (Rura! ~ocat~ons tnly; ' -:
res, L:O l . : d ' ..
Address _ ~ I ,: T,J~z{/-~,,/~/ ~, ~/C ~2/~V,~'~:ip ~,~]O/ Telephone
B. Water to FacilitY Provided b~ Depth to" Groundwatar
Soil Characteristics' at Facility ...... "'
Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Deteminations _.
Ds
Contractor CA Contractor' s LiCense No.
Address Zip Telephone ....
Proposed -starting Date. Proposed C~apletion Dste
Worker's C~mpensation C~rtifi Insure~ "'
If This Permit Is Foc F~dification Of An E~{isting Facility, 8riefl¥ Describe Modifications
~roposed .........
Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
· Tank I Waste Product Motor YehZcle
"' Fuel ......
[] []
[] [] []
Unleaded Regular Premium Diesel' 'Waste
Chemical Compos%tion of Materials Stored (not .necessary for motor vehicle fuels)
Tank # Chemical Stored (non-commercial llame~CAS ! (if known) Chemical Previously Stored
... - .... ~if different)
Ss
Transfer of Ownership
E~te o--~n~ fer
Previous Facility Nam~
Previous Owner
accept fully ail obli~ati~ns of pe'r~'i(' N~. i~sued to
':' ... I understand that the Pemitttn~ Authority may revlaw
modify or terminate the transfer, of the Permit to Operate this taadergcound storage
facility upon-receiving this.completed fo~m. - ...............................................
This form has been completed under penalty of
true and correct.
perjury and to the best of my' knowledge is
Title ,,~_~<Z'~_~?~;/.._~;,'/r Date
TANK (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACH TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
1. Tank is: [~vaui ted ~on-Vaul ted [-]E~)uble-Wal 1 ~]Single-Wal 1
2. ~ Material
F arbon Steel '[] Stainless Steel [qPolyvinyl Chloride []']Fiberglass-Clad Steel
iberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [-] Altm]inum [] Bronze [-]Unknown
[-]Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
.... ....... ~,,,~,/~ .~ .... ,......~,.,~.,/~ =_. .......~-~-~ ........... ~//,.,,-~ .......
4. Tank Se~ Containment
[]Double-Wall [] Synthetic 'Liner []Lined Vault [~None ~Unknown
[]Other (describe): Manufacturer:
[-] Ma ter i~l ThickneSs (Inches) Capacity (Gals.
5. Tank .Interior ~
--~Rubber [-]Alkyd []Epoxy [Phenolic []Glass [~]Clay
[]Other (describe):
.... 6. ~Tank Corrosion Protecti-on--.~'~ ...... ~ ......... ~ ..... · ...... . ...... -=-.,~.~.-.:-=~. ...... _ ...... -~ ............ -..-~-..~ .................................. . .......
~Galvanfzed -]~'~-~ass-Clad [qPolyethylene Wrap []¥inyl Wrappi~
[]Tar or Asphalt ~Unknown. []None I~]Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: []None []Impressed Current System ~lSacrificial' ;%~ode system
Describe System & Equipment:
7. L_eak. Detection, Monitoring, .and Interce~
a. Tank: []-]Visual (vaulted tanks only) [_]Groundwater Monitorirg' Well(s)
~]Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) []U-Tube Without Liner.
10.
He
~]U-Tube with C~mpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring We.Il(s)*
Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor' [-]Conductivit~ Sensor'
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space 'of Double Wall Tank
[-] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Frc~ U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space
Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testin~
None [] Unknown ~Other
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'
[]Monitoring S~p with Race~y [']Sealed Concrete Raceway
~Half-Cut C~patible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Raceway ~None
~'Unknown [] Other
*Describe Make & Model:
Tank Tightness .
II--is Tank Been Tightness Tested? []Yes []No ~]Jnknown
Date of Last Tightness Test ~//~ Results of Test
Test Name ~/~i Testing Company .
Tank Repair
~ Repaired? []Yes []No ~nknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
Overfill Protection
~qOperatOr Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors L~vel
[]Tape Float Gauge [-]Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
B Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill ~ox ONone ~_~Jnknown
Other:
List Make & Model For Above Devices
11.
Piping
a. Underground .Piping: ~Yes. [No []Unknown Material ~--~'~/
Thickness ~inches) '' Diameter Manufacturer
[7qPressure []Suc~ion ~']Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe
................... b.-~-Underground-Plping..Corrosion Protection': ..... ' ................
[]Galvanized '-[]Fiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current []Sacrificial Anode
[~]Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wrap []-]Tar or Asphalt
~nknown [-]NOne ~]Other (describe):~
Underground Piping, Secondary Contairment: ,'
I-]Double-Wall ~]Synthetic Liner System ~]None ~3;nknown
[~Other (describe):
'r~K ~ (FILL OUT SEPA~TE FO~ ~CH T~K)
FOR EACH SE~ION, CHECK ~ ~PROPRIATE BOXES
2. ~ Material
C~oride
~ Fiberglass~l~
Carn Steel ~ Stainless Steel ~l~inyl
Steel
Fi~rglass-Refnf~rc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~
~Other (de~rl~)
3. ' Priory Contai~nt
~te ~stalled ~ic~ess (Inches) Ca.city (~llons) ~nufacturer
4. Tank Seconda[y Con~ai~en~
~ ~ ter ial T~lc~ess (Inches) Ca.city (Gals.)
5. Tank. Interior Lini'~
.... ~Other (descri~):
6. Tank 'Corrosion ProtectiOn · ............................... --- .... ..... -'- ............. ~ .... .......... - ............ ~=-. ..... -.._
~Galvani'z~ ~ass-cl~ ~)l~ylene wrap ~vinyl ~a~i~
~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~):
· Cath~lc Protection:' ~ne ~press~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crifiCial' ~e ~t~
~ri~ system & Egui~ent:
7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interc.~
~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wt~ut ~ner
U-~ wt~ C~ttble Liner D[r~ti~ Flow ~ Monltori~ ~l(s)*
Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Li~id ~vel ~n~r* ~ Cond~tivit~
~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ce of ~ubie Wall Tank
~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~e, Monitori~ ~11
~ily Ga~t~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~Peri~ic Tigh~e~ Testi~
~None ~o~' ~her
b. Pipit: Fl~-Restricti~ ~ak Detector(s) for Pressuriz~ Pipi~"
~ ~nitori~ S~p with ~ce~y '~ ~al~ Concrete ~ce~y
~lf-Cut C~tible Pi~ ~ceway ~S~t~tic Liner ~ce~y ~None
~nkno~ ~ ~her
8. Tank Tightness
~is Ta~ ~en Tigh~ess ~sted? ~Yes ~ ~kno~
~te of ~st Ttghtne~ Test /y/~ Results of Test
9. Tank ~
~te(s) of Re.ir(s)
10. ~erfill Protection
~[ator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~vel
~Ta~ Fl~t Ga~e ~Fl~t Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Controls
Other: List ~ke & ~el For ~e ~ices
11. Pipin9
a. Underground Piping: s DNo DUnknown Material o//'-'~"~'F/''
Thickness (inches) ' Diameter Manufacturer
[-]Pressure OSucti%n' [-]Gravity "Approximate Length Of Pipe ~ '/~2~,~-~
.................... b,. Underground Pipi ~]. Corrosion. Protect i on _:
~Galvanized [qFiberglass-Clad [qImpre~-s~d---cur'r-~-- [']s~6r-i-ftCial~Anode'
r-]Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation' [qvtnyl Wrap [-]Tar or Asphalt
~nknown [qNone E]Other (dem:ribe) :;
c. Underground Piping, Secondary Contair~ent: '
r-]Double-Wall E]Synthetic Liner System [-]None [~r~nown
E]Other (describe):
111,~I ·
.~CO.D~D ,o... CITY OF BAKERSFIELD '-2-~
,. Book ^T ..,,G,,, CALIFORNIA o~w,4 ~------~I~C~
OF,'iC~A~. R[CORO= OF
KERN COUP, CALIFONNIA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CHECKED
}:;':'.;v,:
70 ,/,ct
= .2.,, / Z
~L)~I~-~t'nL~V ~ST~C S~.~C~S.
?.0. BOX 15<7
~A.,~RSr'IEIA)~ ~,A.~ 93~2
INC.
" HORNER EASY TESTING I:IETHOD ~ '
~ ' WORI( SHEET
8AKERSf'IELD, C~t., 93~)2
(805)
HORNER EASY TESTING METHOD z5 /.o ~
WORK 81-1[[T
Cust~?:,n'~er r, anle: CItY OF BAKERSFIELD
HORIZONTAL ~.,TANK---(RNI))--- 45.5 IN. DIA. X 80
~ HEAD DEPTH .... ..5 IN.
DEPTH I.(IN. ) VOLUME (GAL. ) DEPTH (IN. ) VOLUME
0. 500'
0. 750
1. 000
1. 250
1. 500
1. 750
2. 000
2. 250
2. 500
2. 750
3.0~ZI0
3. 250
3. 500
3. 750
4. 000
4. 250
4. 500
4. 750
5.0~Z~0
5. 250
5. 500
5. 750
6. 000
6. 250
G. 500
G. 750
7. 000
7. 250
7. 500
7. 750
8. 000
8. 250
8. 500
8. 750
9. 000
9. 250
9. 500
9. 750
10. 000
10. 250
10. 750
! 1. 000
11. 250
1 1. 500.
11,750
---i
12. 250
12.5°0
12. 750
13. 000
13. 250
13. 500
13,750
-: 0- 40
1. 12~
2.05
3.15'
4.40'
5.77!~!
7.26'
8.
10.55:'
12.33'
14.~1
16. 1G:~.
18. 19
20. ~9 ~
22.47.
24.71 ~i
27.01.,
29.38
31.80;
34.' 28
36.82
39.41".
42.05
44.75 ·
47.48
50. E:7'
53. 10
55.98 .
58.89
61.85
64.85
67.89;
70.96
74.07',
77. ~21
80.4.0!
86.86
90. 13
93.44
96.78
_ lOO~15:
103.55.
106.97
110.42
113.8~
117.39
124.47
128.04~
131.63
135.25
138.8~
142.54
146.22
)
14. 000
14. 250
14. 500
14. 750
15. 000
15. 250
15. 500
15. 750
16. 000
16. 250
16. 500
16. 750
17. 000
17. 250
17. 500
17. 750
18. 000
18. 250
18. 500
18. 750
19. 000
19. 250
19. 500
19. 750
20. 000
8 Z~. 850
~0. 500
20. 750
21. 000
21. 250
21. 500
21. 750
22. 000
22. 250
22. 500
22. 750
23. 000
23. 250
23. 500
8;3. 750
24. 000
84. ~5.0
24. 500
24. 750
25. 000
25. 250
25.5~Z.~
-- - 25. 750
26. 000
26. 250
26. 500
26. 750
27. 000
2'7. 250
27. 500
2'7. 750,
· 28. 000
88. 250
28.~
,.jIZll~.q
213. 750
29. 000
89. 250
29. 500
29. 750
30. 000
-~7~,
IN. SFtELL LENGTH
(GAL. ) · DEP]'H (IN. ) VOLUME (GAL. )
149.91
153.63
15'7.36
161.11
164.87
168.65
172.45
176.26
180.09
183.93
187.78
191.64
195.52
199.41
203.31
207.22
211.14
215.07
219.01
228.95
226.91
230.87
234.84
238.81
242.80
246.78
250.77
~,~4.7'7
258.77
262.77
266.78
270.79
274.80
278.81
282.82
286.83
290.85
294.86
298.87
302.88
306.89
314.90
318.90
322.89
326.88
330.87·
334.85
338.83
342.80'
346.'76
350.71
354.66
358.60
362.53
366.45
370.36
374.2~
378.15
382.02
385.89
389.74
393.58
397.41
401.22
4~5.01
30.500
30.750
31.000
31.250
31.500
31.750
32.000
32.250
32.500
32.750
33.000
33.250
33.500
33.750
34.000
34.250
34.500
34.750
35.000
35.250
35.500
35.750
36.000
36.250
36.500
36.750
37.000
37.250
37.500
37.750
38.000
38.850
38.500
38.750
39.000
39.250
39.500
39.750
40.000
40.250
40.500
41.000
41.250
41.500
41.750
........ 42.000
42.250
42.500
42.750
43.000
43.250
43.500
43.750
44.000
44.250
44.500
44.750
45.000
45.250
45.500
Tot ~1 Vol
408.79
41°=. 56
416.31
420.04
423.75
427.45
431.12
434.78
438.42
442.03
445.63
449.20
452.75
456.27
459.77
463.25
466.70
470.12
473.52
476.88
480.22
483.53
486.81
490. 06
493. 27
496.45
499.60
502.71
505.~8
508.82
511.81
514.77
517.69
520.56
523.40
526.18
528.~2
531.61
534.25
536.84
539.38
541.86~
544.29
546.66
548.96
551.20
553, 37
557.51
559.46
561.33
563.12
564.81
566.41
567.89
569.87
570.51
571.61
572.55
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, .California
Mailing Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(8O5) 861-3636
COUNTY HEAL'I"H DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
July 21, 1988
John Patterson
2101 "H" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
Re: All Bakersfield City F/re Departments
Dear Mr. Patterson,
This letter ts to advise you that all Bakersfield City Fire
Departments will be granted a "provisional exemption" from the
standard reporting described in your permit packet. As we
discussed in our meeting, all facilities will follow low
throughput reporting requirements as stated in the attached "Low
Throughput Reporting Outline."
This Department is 'currently undertaking a study of the
inventory control problems of iow-throughput tanks. To facilitate
this, a copy of reconciliation worksheets for tanks listed on the
attached outline must be sent to this Department monthly so that
we may add this information to our data base. Please send all
submittals to my attention.
Our preliminary information indicates that a change in
reportable variations is necessary when the throughput of a tank
is less than.. 2,000 gallons per Week and less than lO,OpO, gallons
per month. The accompanying "Low Throughput Tank Reporting
Outline" describes these changes.
A revised action chart and an example of a changed summary
sheet (on the back of inventory reconciliation worksheet) have
also been enclosed for your convenience. Please make these
changes on your worksheets for weeks in which you have low
throughput.
! HCT QFFICES
Delano · Lamont · Lakelsal · Mojave · Ridgecrest · Shafter · Taft
John Patterson
July 21, 1988
Page 2
Be advised that this provisional exemption ls subject to
change as further data becomes available to the Health
Department. If, however, a ll~sted tank at any time exceeds the
deftned Iow-throughput amounts, you must revert'to compliance with
the original reporting requirements. If you have any questions
.......... r.e.gardlng this correspondence, I can be reached at (805) 861-3636
betwee 8 am 2-9 :am;- ..... "'-" ' -
Sincerely,
~lar~, Kryszak ~
~.nvtronmental Health Spec.tallst
Hazardous Natertals Management Program
MK/gb.
enclosures
Low--Throuzhput Ta.nk
Report i r.L~ Outline
a
........ .- ~ ..... ~ .-' . ........ . -' .-~: ' i~J- ~ZL.. "_. _ ~ ~ -~ . _ . ...... . -. ...... : ·
These amended permit requirements are only applicable to tank(s)
indicated below when weekly throughput is less than 2000 ~allons
and ~onthly throughput is less than 10,000 gallons: ~
....... · -' ....... Effect:ire-Date: ............. July 19,..1988
Facility Permit # 160013C
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
550 gallon diesel tank
5'50 gallon unleaded tank
Amended Permit Reauirements:
1. Revised inventory reconciliation monitoring worksheets are to
be submitted to the Health Department on a monthly basis.
~. Revised Action Chart is to be posted at facility °
3. All variations exceeding the followin~ amounts must be
reported as described on page 16, Part "2" of Mandbook eUT-IO.
DAILY - 75 gallons
WEEKLY - 150 gallons
NONTHLY - 200 gallons
· TREND ANALYSIS - No change