The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBUSINESS PLAN 5/2/1991~Tl~ OFITQNS FOR T,P~V~ING ~- Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Employee # Employee Signature //~ /~ , Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Site Specific Status Chanc3es: Date C~ee~ozy ~ctivity Hours Code Description (lOths) ~tes: ~ ?/~ ~_ ,'.~ ~ ..... !~ Enter~ By: ~te: CONTRACT OPTIONS ]FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # /,.~.... ,~,,,,. site specific status Changes: Employee # Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding (Local, State, of Federal) Cat~ egory Activity Hours Date uoae Code Description ( 10ths Notes: - .~., , . ,;. ,.~- , . ,~. .. ., · ~. ..~ ,,:~r_.,_ _,'~.~<~ ~,,.~ ' -' ',-t" "' ' ,~,~' , --. 'iQ /? :? . . ~ /,, .- '~ .... ~: ":~ ' ' ' - '--' :' r: ' " ' ':'" ": ") ,~' · ..' _./. iI ' "- J ~...~ / '"~ ,qV 7 / · . ~ .. .... r .... ,- z.':-,, - . ~ -,r ..... ' , ,, ,,, -'"--~', ..~ · ~' ', i' ,/'/' '~" "~ -" "' ' ~'i ""; $'-~ '"' . ' c"r f 'r' r;~ ,I..-~,., &* , Data Entered By: Date: 4113 1:~/ ~'Rev. 5189) I /.3 0~¢¢ N gmor ndum TO : JOE KERN COUNTY DATE: 6/11/90 Telephone No. SUBJECT: VALLEY OLDS #160041 New Address: 2707 "F" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA New Telephone Number: 327-2065 93301 G.S.S. 580 1151 395-5004 (Rev. 4/87) "> f/-. d. '..,,' :a93oH! RANDALL L. ABBO'I-r DIRECTOR D^V1D PRICE I11 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Envi~o~mentaJ Health Sen~ce~ Depan*n~enl STEVE McCALLEY, REHS, DIRECTOR Air Poflution Control I~trict WILLIAM J. RODDY, APCO P~ann~ns & Devek~nent Sen~ces Depanmm TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT October 29, 1990 Bruce Blythe Project Manager Twining Laboratories, Inc. 3701 Pegasus Dr. Suite 124 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Re: Site Remediation Approval for the Valley Oldsmobile Facility Dear Mr. Blythe: This Department has completed the review of the site remediation proposal for the Valley Oldsmobile facility located at 2300 "H" Street in Bakersfield, California. The recommended method of remediation is approved. Your workplan should include a complete inorganic metals analysis on a minimum of two soil samples retrieved from the zone of highest contamination identified during the site characterization. Should you have any questions regarding the above subject matter I may be contacted at (805) 861-3636, Ext. 588. Sincerely, Canas Hazardous Materials Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program JC:ch canas\blythe, let 2700 "M" STREET, SUFFE 300 BAKERSFIELD, C,~_IFORNIA 93301 (805) 861.3636 FAX: (8051 ,~1.~4~Q PROCTOR 'rEST REPORT 114 I Witep content~ #Mod~ed# PPoctor~ ASTM D 1557~ Method A Elev~ Classification N~t. ~ > Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. SP'8' LL PI No.4 No.200 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTIOH Optimum moist~pe = ?.8 ~ STATE SAND. M~xim~m dr~ densit~ = 11~.~ PPoject No.: TL 988-~ Rem~pks: P~oject: VALLEY OLDSMOBILE SAMPLED ~Y: M. 80EHRING Loc~tton: 2500 #H~ STREET LOCATION: ON-SITE BAKERSFIELD! CALIFORHIA SAMPLE DATE: ~/2~_~ ~o~ Date: ~-29-~1 2.48 PROCTOR TEST REPORT THE TWINING LA~ORATORIES~ liNC. Fig~pe No. i Isaacs & Bailey TL 988-99-08 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS This report only presents the test data and results at the locations and depths tested. 'Test locations and elevations, were visually determined from existing site features. The locations, and elevations .of the tests should be c6nsidered accurate.only to the degree implied bythe method used. The relative compaction of the backfill soils, at the locations tested, complies with the minimum requirements stated in the Remedial Action Plan submitted for this project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this Project. Should you. have any questions Concerning the information provided, please contact our office. Sincerely, THE TW~ING LABORATORIES, INC. Scott A. Goehring / Field Supervisor/Bakersfield Office SAG/km 3c: herewith Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Isaacs & Bailey TL 988-99-08 Page 2 Results of Maximum Density-Optimum Moisture Determinations (ASTM Test Method D1557, Method A) Sample Location Material No. Maximum DryDensity, Optimum PCF Moisture, % Composite of material sampled on Jobsite i 113.3 7.8 Results of In-Place Density Tests (ASTMTest Method D2922/Nuclear Gauge with 12 inch Probe) Test Test No. Date 1. 3/25 2. 3/25 3. 3/25 4. 3/26 5. 3/26 6. 3/26 Mate- rial Test Location No. 1 1 1 1 Tank Excavation Tank Excavation Tank Excavation Tank Excavation E. End Tank Excavation 15'W. of E. End Tank Excavation 25'W. of E. End 3/26Tank Excavation 20'W. of E. End Tank Excavation 30'W. of E. End 3/26 Depth Below In- Assumed Place Final Dry Mois- Grade, Density, ture, Inches PCF 96-104 101.8 60-68 105.0 36-44 106.3 0-8 103.0 Rel. Req.. Comp., Comp., % % % 8.0 90.0 90 11.5 92.6 90 10.9 93.8 90 12.7 91.1 90 12-20 106.8 13.0 94.2 90 12-20 106.3 7.0 93.8 90 0-8 110.0 11.6 97.0 90 0-8 106.8 8.3 94.2 90 Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Geotechnicaland EnvironmentaIConsultants * Engineering and Chemical Laboratories March 29, 1991. TL 988-99-08 For: Isaacs & Bailey 2707 "F' Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Attn: Mr. CeCil Bailey Project: VALLEY OLDSMOBILE 2300 "H" STREET BAKERSFIELD¥ CALIFORNIA Subject: Soil Density Testing Dear Mr. Bailey: This report presents the results .of in-place density tests conducted' on the backfill soils placed in a tank excavation located at the above referenced project site. The scope of our testing was authorized and directed by Mr. Cecil Bailey, a representative with Isaacs & Bailey. These tests were conducted by the following personnel of The Twining Laboratories, Inc.: Mr. Bruce Bllrthe on March 25, 1991, and Mr. Mark Goehring on March 26, 19191. Project Specifications: In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan dated March 19, 1991, prepared by The Twining Laboratories, Inc.; the backfill materials shall be moisture conditioned as necessary and- compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D- 1557. [] 2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472 Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021 [] 9401 West Goshen Avenue Visalia, Califomia 93291 · (209)651-2190 1405 Granite Lane, Suite I [] 3701 Pegasus Drive. Suite 124 * ~.cy See Instructions*on..,~ of P~ge 6'.-ti ,~... 7. Tran~2~~ 8. US EPA~ N~ . '"- " ' I I I I I I I I '1' I'1'1 GENERATOR'S ~~: I hereby d~are t~t ~ ~t~ta of thl~ ~ are ~1~ and a~mte~ hat,al 'gorget ~u~t~s. ff I am a large quant~ g~t~. I ~ that I have a ~ram ~ pla~a to ~e the v~e ..~ to be ~onomi~l~ pra~b~ a~ t~t I have ~ ~ pra~able met~ of tmat~. ~age. ~ d~l ~ ~ to ~ ~ m~ea t~ preee~ and ~ure t~eat to human heath and ~ ~nt; ~. If I am a ~11 qua~ ~mt~. I have m~ a ~ ~ lo m~ ~ ~Me. genemti~ and 8el~ the ~at waste ~g~t ~ t~t ia availab~ to ~ and ~t I ~n aff~. '*' ~ P~nledlTDed N~ I ~ignature -- ~ ~y Year I E 19. Dlacrepan~ Indication Space F A C I L I 20. Facil~y ~er or Operator ~cat~n of r~eipt of h~rdoua matedala covered by thia man,eat except aa not~ In ~em 19. ~ Pdnted/T~ed Name Signature ~ · Day Year DHS 8022 A EPA 8700---22 (Rev. 6-89) Prevloua editions are obao~ete. Do Not Write Below This Line Blue: GENEP. ATOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DOH$ WITHIN 30 UNIFORM: HAZARDOUS ./:WASTE MANIFEST .... 1. GMterato~o US EPA ID No. See InstrucUons on/~J~ of Page and Front o(.~o 7.. , Manifest 2. Page I : 8. US EPA ID Numbez.- ' US EPA ID Number ' .' 5. Tranaperter 1 Company Name 7. Trefmpmler 2 Company Name · US EPA ID'Numhar t 1.~'.U$ DOTDesc~)tk~'OnclndMg PToI~r 8hipping Name, Hazard (~iaan~ and ID Number~ * a..h'(m?R(nA-.:K6ZAR])OOS VAST SOL ) (OZL & COJr MI]L T ) SO L) o*I .la not ~q. bKI by Fe(k~l Mw. 12. Contoinem 18. TotalT~:. - ·. Q.antify ' (80Q)332:~5376' ~ P~ ~, 91E2182: GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents ot this consignment m'e tully and accuretely described above by propel' shlPPiN) name · and ere cla88ified, pecked, marked, and labeled, end are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable international and national government regulationo. If I em · large quantity generator, I certify that I have e program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have detmmined to be economically practicable end that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present sad future threat to human health and the envtromnent; OR, If I ant a 8mall gusntlty gonerator, I have made a good fai~ effmt to minimize my waste generation and 8elect the best waste msnegemant method that le available to me and that I can afford. Printed/Typed Name 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Material8 i/Typed Name 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materiel8 I Sigflat~~_~ Month Day Year Sigl e Month Day Year Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Year I 19. Discrepancy indicstion Space .. 20. Facility Owner or Operator Certiticstion ct receipt o! hazardous materials covered by this manifest except ss.noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name f. Signsture Month Day Year J Do Not Write Below This Line DHS 8022 A EPA 8700--22 (Rev. 6-89) Previou8 editions are obsolete. ~,;ue: GENERAIOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS W)THIN 30 DAY5 '" ~d,mO~m~.~d we,~,e Ag~,~y' :..~,; - " . ' See Instructiorm on 'of Page 6 ~ .oMB.o.~-oo3~~ I - ' ' - '.: T~~~,~ ' ~:'~ :: .-:. and Fr~ .. ~ ~ ~.' . · :..:~:¥.~.~-.,.,~...:: :..~ . . ........ F. ront ~,,1~ 7 · .'~ : -. ~: 8aaraa~atO, California ' c. . ~.1 am a ~e quant~ g~mt~, I ~i~ that I have a ~ram ~ place to r~u~ the v~ ~ to~ of wa~e g~at~ to t~ d~ I ~w · "...pmsent a~ ~ure threat to hu~n heath a~ ~e en~t; ~, H I am a small quant~ ~t~, I have ~de a ~ f~ eff~ to ~ ~.waate . generation and aele~ ~e ~at waste ma~g~ me~ t~t le aval~13le to me a~ ~t I = e~. ' P~nted/T~d ~ Signature ~ ~ . ~ ~y Y~r 17 r A~n ~g p~vf Marshals Printed/Ty~d Na~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Day. 18. Trana~r 2 ~cEnowledgement of Receipt of Materials PdntedlTyped Name ] 8~flature ' ~ Day Year 19. Discrepan~ I~i~tion Space 20. Facil~y ~ or Operat~ Ce~ificat~n of r~eipt of h~ar~us martials cover~ by this ~est exce~ as, noted In ~em 19. ' Print~/Ty~d Name I Si~;nature ~ Day Year I I I I I I I DHS 8022 A EPA 8700--22 (Rev. 6-89) Previous ecfltion8 are obsolete. Do Not Write Below This Une Blue: GENERATOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAYS " I.:,~a ~:'~ ~Ulilll:'tlllU .MATARn(MI.~. It. Generator's US EPAIDNo. , Manifest I 2. Page 1 I.~;~:~;~/-a~,~-~. ;, , . -t.. . Doc ment No. * ~.~ '; .... ,,. .......... : ;,;;;~WASTE ' MANIFEST I~ IltLlOIOIOISlIl~lSlglOJOIOI OIO1'11 : °~ 1;;~;~' [ ;.~. ,~.-/'"~r~-~ ~ec~u ~'".'-.~ ~ ~.i~'~! ~,~,~ ~' ..... mozo~, z.t'Zm~T~, z.e, !: 1~a00~nB- '6"1'W!~ - ' ~. ,~ , · . . .. . . 6. Tmn~rt~'lCompanyName 6. U~EPA ID Number, . ~~-~ , ...... _ . .~ ' '= m ~J~Tom~x°~, z.c. ~c,.,~)~g~iB~2,~g~si~,o,. i "i 7. Transpoller2CompanyNarrm 8. .~: US EPA ID ,umbel' ' '~ ' ' 'N,=,,.ed .Addr I I I I I I I I-')/I I'"i;'1'. g. Designated Facility Sit ess 10. US EPA ID Numb4~....,' '~~ 35231. OM) S~ ;,0AO ' .... :~ . 1i. US DOT DeanrlpUon (Including Proper 8hipping Name, Hazard (;Iaaa. and ID Number)-' '-I ·:' ..... ...,: ',o, to,,. I '-" - I ... -':.,..~ · co~r.a~~ so~) I . /".":_..'.1 "'N. -- IO1011 DIT/F-'4UI~II~IT":"'~~ 'E ~. · ' - I ' - I~~1~~ . _ , i . i t~~ ':.:."- · ~ ...... ' · ~ ~ ~ ~,~ - I I I ..1'1-.I I I . "'"~"' "T ~ ':" ..... ::::::::::::::::::::::: :;:?h':;:?~;??::;::::~m:~:~:¢~"'~'~:; .~' 16. ~p~tal ~ndling Inat~ a~ Add~nal Inf~ati~ ' . ~~ ~= ~ ~~ ~. ~ 794g ..... ,.. ... ~ O~ ~ 0~ ~0. 037 -'~ : (8~)332-5376 ~ ~ ~, 91~182 ~ : 10. :-. OENE~TOR'S ~~: I ~by d~lare ~t ~e c~tema of this c~ a~ ~1~ and a~ate~ de~ ~ by ~ ~ ~me a~ are claaaffi~. ~, ~. a~ la~l~, and am in all reapers nat~al g~emme~ ~t~. ~ I am a ~e quant~ ~t~, I ~1~ that I have a pr~ram In place to r~uoe ~e v~ and toxic~ of waste ~t~ to ~ d~ I ~w ~t~ to ~ ~~ pra~ a~ ~t I have ael~ t~ pra~l~blre m~h~ ~ tr~t~, at.age, ~ dla~l ~n~ a~ to ~ ~ m~ea t~ · ~eae~ and ~ure t~t to h~ heath and ~e en~r~ment; ~. H I am a small quant~ gestate. I have ~de a ~ ~ to ml~e ~ wa~e g~tl~ and aate~ ~ ~ ~ate management meth~ that la aval~ble to me P~nt~/T~ed Name . 17. Tr~na~r 1 Ackno~t'of R~i~ of Mated~ .... Pdnted/T~d Name / ~u~ ~a~ Yea¢ I 0 l~./Tra~s~er 2'A~n~l~em~ ~ ~t of Materials ~,. P~nted/T~d Name ..' ~ ~ ~ i/. ~ Signature ~ Day Year / E 19. Discrepancy Indicat~n ~ace F A C I I 20. Facil~ O~er or Operat~ ~t~n of receipt of haza~ous marshals cover~ by ~ls ~n~eat except as noted ~ ~em 19. T ~..y Printed/Typed Name I ~ignature M~h Day Year I I t I I I DHS 8022 A EPA 8700-22 (Rev. 6-89) Previous editions are obsolete. Do Not Write Below This Une i~iue: GENERATOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN J,O g/-'~' Chemi Waste lVlanage , ent, Inc. AL 7§4§ WASTE PROFILE [] Check here if this is a Recertification LOCATION OF ORIGINAL I GENERAL INFORMATION 1. GENERATOR NAME: Rt")BF.R'r W. 2. Generator Address: ? ~('1CI "~" ~'vR~',F,T BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 3. Technical Contact/Phone: RI~TTP.~ 'RT.YT141~/(R_05) 4. Alternate Contact/Phone: I-]ITNTTNGTON FNTERPRTRES_. INC. Generator USEPA ID: Billing Address: [] Same 2707 "F" RTRF~ET BAKEgSFTELD, C.~,TFOENIA 9330]. 393-5088 Billing Contact/Phone: CECIL BAILEY/(805~ 327-2065 PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION 5. Process GeneratingWaste: CT.F. AN-UP OF .(:;~3T1'. C~NTAMTMATTON RERULTING 6. Waste Name: OIL AND GREASE CONTAMINATED SOIL 7A. Is this a USEPA hazardous waste (40 CFR Part 261)? Yes [] No [~ B. Identify ALL USEPA listed and characteristic waste code numbers (D,F,K.P,U): NA FROM LEAKING UST State Waste Codes: 611 8. Physical State @ 70°F: A. Solid ~ Liquid [] Both [] B. SinglE, Layer [] Multilayer [] C. Free liquid range to O/o 9A. pH: Range ,~. ] to or Not applicable ['''~ B. Strong Odor []; describe 10. Liquid Flash Point: < 73°F [] 73-99°F [] 100-139°F [] 140-199°F ~___J _.> 200°F ~ N.A. I~ Closed Cup [] Open Cup [] 11. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: List ALL constituents (including halogenated organics) present in any concentration and forward available analysis. Constituents Range Units Constituents Range Units SOIL 0- 100 percent: TOTAL COMPOSITION MUST EQUAL OR EXCEED 100o~ 12. OTHER: PCBs if yes, concentration ppm, PCBs regulated by 40 CFR 761 ~_J. Benzene if yes, concentration ppm. Shock Sensitive r-~ oxicfizer [] 13. If the waste is subject to the land ban and meets the treatment standards, check here: Pyrophoric ~ Explosive [] Radioactive [] Carcinogen [] Infectious [] Other . and supply analytical results where applicable. SHIPPING INFORMATION 14. PACKAGING: Bulk Solid ~ Bulk Liquid [] Drum [] Type/Size: 15. ANTICIPATED ANNUAL VOLUME: 120 Units: Other Shipping Frequency: one time SAMPLING INFORMATION 16a. Sample source (drum, lagoon, pond, tank, vat, etc.) Date Sampled: 16b. Generator's Agent Supervising Sam01ing: I AUTHORIZE CWM, INC. TO OBTAIN A SAMPLE AT THE ENTRY GATE. Sampler's Name/Company: 17. [] No sample required (See Instructions.) GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION/~rC,"Oi~O//qE,. 7-~ / # ,'=C~ /~ ,'F'r' ~ C ~ yt'./( /~ g F /~,' i~ ~= E~/ L Y"; ~ I hereby certify that all information sut3m~tte~ in this and all attached Oocuments contains true and accurate descriptions of this waste. Any sample submitted is reoresentative [ as defined in 40 CFR 261 - Appendix I or Dy using an equivalent method. All relevant reformation regarding known or suspected hazards in the possession of the generator has ~ been~flcIosed. I autf~'ofijTe CWM to oOtain a sample from any waste shipment for purposes of recert~fication. ~ Signature Printed (or ~yped) ~ame and title Date Date _4 .- ..Z~"-- 9/ Page / of ~', Report To: Client Name Address Contact Name Contract/POll j~C THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC. 2527 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721 (209) 268-7021 hain-of-Custody and Analysis Request Record Copies To: Expected Turnaround: Rush [] Routine Specify Time .~R '%.2,~ .-~/ ./.~ .~¢~d . Project Name Address Analysis Requested TL# ~ Lab Due Date ' Sampler Name " ' ....... '~" - #/S,ze/Type of Container / / IV / / / / / / / / v '~t Client Sample ,,' Sample _,Ji Sample ID Date/Time .' Type 'Preservation/Handling: ...... E~ch h~z~rdou~ s~mple lubmllted For W~ter ~mples, please Oommenls: (~ILL TO IF OTHE~) ~ep'!~!:;'i!nilials ~ rDate~ime '~. ;Location lor~nllystswlll be~h~rgedl h~rd- chect one el lhe tollowing: ':~01 '"' .... ' ' ous w~ste disposal tee, Olienl~ lhll ~ Drinking W~ler ~0~:~" / ' relrieve h~z~rdous ~mple~ wilhin 30 ~ Wasle WMer days of the analytical report date will e Ground Water (wells) ¥~.603 be refunded any disposal fees. ~ Surface Water (rivers, lakes) Relinquished ~ ~ Delivered By: .,~ived:~y~,;;~?;?;~??;:~-::: :.;/'....~ :Received By: Signaturo~,~ ~' Signature ~i~{~;i?~?~?*~?~;~4~'F:~}('¥"':"~:':'i '~'" .... . " ' ~ .:~,.~{,~ ~,~.~;.-,,..'~,'.~.c. ~:...: :.' ~' :':~A .d.-~'~ .- ~ .Signature Pri~~<~-~- ~~ Printed ,.Company.' ....... ~'~'.'.'~ :.".'..:'".."-"'"~' .~ 'company . Company ~/~ , Company ~DateH~me , -- .... Date/Time D~te~ime -~"~*~/ ~o Date~ime '.Log In DateHime ':" Log In Date/Time REPORT DATE : March 29, 1991 EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1525.1-? PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe PAGE 2 of 2 CLIENT : Isaacs & Bailey PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmobile DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 by B. Blythe DATE RECEIVED: 03-26-9'1 at 1513 hrs. from B. Blythe DATE PREPARED: 03-27-91 DATE ANALYZED: ! ANALYZED BY REVIEWED BY : D. Lehman : J. Strutzel SAMPLE TYPE CONSTITUENT Soil Lead. (Pb) METHOD: 7421 EXAM NO. .SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION .RESULT MDL .(rog/kg) (rog/kg) 691- 535.2 691-1525.3. 691-1525.3 691-1525.4 691-1525.5 691-1525.6 691-1525.7 5-19 Piping Trench 3.0' BSG 18' E/SW Bldg. Corn. 5-20 Piping Trench 3.5' BSG 17' W/NE Bld9 Corn. 5-21 li.5' BSG Bottom of Excavation 5-22 8.5' BSG N/Sidewall 5-23 8.5' BSG W/Sidewall 5-24 8.5' BSG E/Sidewall 5-~5 8.5' BSG S/Sidewall 3.8 0.5 5.3 0.5 1.9 0.5 13 0.5 5.8 0.5 130 0.5 4.5 0.5 NOTES: mg/kg: milligrams Der kilogram (parts per million) MDL : Method Detection Limit REPORT .DATE : March 29, 1991 EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1525.1-7 CLIENT : Isaacs & Bailey PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmobile PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe PAGE 1 of 2 DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 by B. Blythe DATE RECEIVED: 03-26-91 at 1513 hrs. f~om B. Blythe DATE PREPARED: 03-26-91 DATE ANALYZED: 03-27-91 ANALYZED BY R~VI~WED BY : M. Peterson · ' J. 'Koelewyn SAMPLE TYPE : Soil CONSTITUENT : Oil ~ Grease METHOD: -413.2 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION RESULT (mg/kg) MDL (mg/kg) 691-1525.1 5-19 Piping Trench 5§ 5 3.0' BSG 18' E/SW Bldg Corn. 691-1525.2 5-20 Piping Trench 50 3.5' BSG 17' W/NE Bldg Corn. 691-1525.3 5-21 11.5' BSG Bottom 35 of Excavation 691-1525.4 5-22 8.5' BSG N/Sidewall 45 691-1525.5 5-23 8.5' BSG W/Sidewall 45 691-1525.6 5-24 8.5' BSG' E/Sidewall 105 691-1525.7 5-25 8.5' BSG S/Sidewall' 50 5 5 5 5 5 NOTES: mg/kg: milligrams Der kilogram' {parts per million) MDL : Method Detection Limit to the County's performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must enter into a County agreement, attachment To safeguard the environment, the environmental sensitivity (Attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for groundwater contami:~ation. Only sites determined to be non- environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Option Agreement; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Option Agreement, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeoiogical condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It is necessary for you to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice: either the State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the County's Local Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure "B", and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield. CA 93301, Attention: Underground Storage Tank Contract Administrator. IJ~ you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made this selection and that you have read Attachment "D", the official notification, in a letter sent to the address indicated above. Failure to respond in writing to this notice within ten (10) calendar days will automaticaJly result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under the terms of the State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Attachment "D" will then serve as the official notification of your enrollment into the State Pilot Program for Underground Storage Tanks. If you should have any questions re~arding this matter, please contact John NIlon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mar~ Weddell AssJistant County Administrative Officer gnvJironmental Health attachments ~700 '~' ~creec. ~ce. 300 8akers~e~o. CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 KERN COUNTO Env:Lrormenta. l Hea. ith Dep~rtment ATTACHMENT 'D' February 14, 1989 Mr. Cecil Bailey Dr. Robert Hunington 3939 Bernard St. ~6 Bakersfield, CA 93306 SUBJECT: Location: 2300 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 Known As: Valley Oldsmobile West PERMIT #: 160041 Dear Mr. Cecil Bailey: This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below: Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks: and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole or in part. from the Hazardous Substance,Cleanup Fund: and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site: YOU ARE MEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code. the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site. and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely. Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative Officer Environmental Health OIST'~I~TOF~CES WILLIAM F. ISAACS. CPA CECIL J. BAILEY. CPA ISAACS & BAILEY CERTIFIED PUBLIC; ACCOUNTANTS 3939 BERNARD STREET. SUITE 6 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 98806 TELEPHONE (805) 872-5525 Septent~r 6, L9 85 MEMBERS CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS .u~. Theodore D. Wright, RCE, Engineering Manager The Twinin~ T~horatories, Inc. 5301 Office Park Drive, Ste. 310 Bakersfield, California 93309 Re: Valley Oldsmobile underground storage tank. Dear ~. Wright: Thank you for submitting a pro?osal on the above project. %'~e would like you to proceed as indicated in. your proposal and subsequent telephone conversation. Sincere ly, ti Oliver 2700 M Street Bakersfield, California Mailing Address: 1415 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 861-3636 "RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEiI ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH DIVISION April 13, 1988 HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Reichard Remey Ortiz 2300 "H" Street Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: Tank Abandonments, Valley Olds West 2300 "H" Street, Bakersfield Dear Mr. Ortiz This department has reviewed the laboratory analyses for the underground storage tanks at the Valley Olds West facility, abandonment Permit #A612-61. These results indicated no significant contamination in the soil beneath the gasoline tank or the east waste oil tank and their piping. However, the analyses for the north waste oil tank and its piping indicated significant levels of oil and grease and lead contamination. This discovery requires a site characterization to find the full extent of contamination surrounding this tank and its piping. You have 30 days from the date of this letter to submit a site characterization proposal to this department. Please refer to pages 8, 9, and 10 of Handbook #UT-30, "Requirements for Permanent Closure of Underground Hazardous Substance Storage Tanks" for guidance in developing a site characterization study. The proposal (workplan) must be approved by this department prior to beginning the work. Please note that once you determine the full extent of contamination and the threat to groundwater, you must develop a mitigation proposal to correct this problem. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Bill Scheide Environmental Health Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program BS/gb cc: Brian McNabb FILE [-]Pe~mit to Operate ,~ ~rnmStruction Permit ~ it to abandon~ /~. ~D7'~ [-]Amended Permit Condition~ [~Permit Application Form, ~]<~pplication to Abandon f-]Annual Report Forms CONTENTS INVENTORY No. of TanksJ Tank Sheets tanks(s) Date Date Da te Da te [-]Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator ~Inspection Reports ~Correspondence- Received Da te Da te Da te '~Correspondence - Mailed Da te Date Da te []Unauthorized Release Reports []Abandonment/Closure Reports '~_ Sampl ing/nab Reports [-]MVF Compliance Check (New Construction ~Checklist) []STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) [-]MVF Plan Check (New Construction) []]STE) Plan Check (New Construction) FqMVF Plan Check (Existing Facility) ~STD Plan Check (Existing Facility) [-]"Incomplete Application" Form []Permit Application Checklist ' [] Permit Instructions FqDiscarded [-]Tightness Test Results Date Da te Da te [-]Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits []Environmental Sensitivity Data: []Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs ~Location of Water Wells []Statement of Underground Conduits []Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data []]Photos Construction Drawings Location FlHalf sheet showing date received and tally of inspection time, [] Mi scellaneous etc AG/lieU/ I~N£¥1£A/ A~IAI LABORATORIES. In . J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGli. 4100 PIEi~CE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327o4911 ~.~eable Aromatics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION 7808 OLCOTr AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Attention: BRYAN McNABB Lab No.: Sample Desc: / .... VALLEY OLDSMOBILE !~GASOLINE TANK @2_ '._.~-';.. DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE 09-Feb-88 10-Feb-88 Date of Report: 16-Feb-88 DATE ANALYSIS CXIMPLETED: 16-Feb-88 Reporting Analysis Constituent Units Results Minimum Reporting Level Benzene ug/g Toluene ug/g Ethyl Benzene ug/g p-Xylene ug/g m-Xylene ug/g o-Xylene ug/g Isopropyl Benzene ug/g Pet. Hydrocarbons ,~_~/g None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 6.01 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 5.0O Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ,~/g 6.01 0.10 TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline Dry Matter Basis Co~men~s: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition the constiO~ents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The st~ t~otal of all [non-chlorin- ated] constituents on this report. Robert Plaisance Chemist C#E¥1CA~ A~AL Y$15 P~rTROL~rU¥ LABORATORIES, In[':. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGII. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Bmrgeable Aro~mtics (SOIL) McNABB CONSTRUCTION 7808 OLfXTIT AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Attention: BRYAN McNABB Date of Report: 16-Feb-88 Lab No.: Sample Dasc: 1086-2 VALLEY OLDSMOBILE GASOLINE TANK ~6' DATE SAMPLE COLLECTED: 09-Feb-88 DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: lO-Feb-88 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 16-Feb-88 Minimum Reporting Analysis Reporting ~onstituent Units Results Level Penzene ug/g Toluene ug/g Ethyl Benzene ug/g p-Xylene ug/g m-Xylene ug/g o-Xylene ug/g I sopropyl Benzene ug/g Pet. Hydro~arbons ug/g None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 5.00 Total Petroleum Hydroc~ns ug/g None Detected 0.10 TEST METHOD: r~lifornia D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline Dry Matter Basis C~omments: PETROLEUM HYD~CARBONS: ~antifir~tion of volatile hy~bons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition the constit~ents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin- ated] oDnstituents on this report. Robert Plaisance (~emist AGflICLIL Tl, l~lf £HE~ICAL AlgAL YSlS LABORATORIES, IFlC. J. J. EGLIN, RE'G, CHEM. ENGII. 4104) PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 ATTN: Bryan McNabb Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-3 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample Description: Valley Olds, 2/9/88, East Waste Oil Tank @ 2', sampled by; David Rittenhouse Title 22 Total Metals~ mg/kg Sample Results Method Reference TTLC, mg/kE Antimony 7040 1 Arsenic 7061 1 Barium 7080 Beryllium 210.1 2 Cadmium 7130 1 Chromium 7190 1 Cobalt 291.1 2 Copper 220.1 2 Lead 10.8 7421 1 Mercury 7471 1 Molybdenum 246.1 2 Nickel 7520 1 Selenium 7741 1 Silver 7760 1 Thallium 279.1 2 Vanadium 286.1 2 Zinc 289.1 2 Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease (-) 20. pH 9040 1 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080 TOX, ug/g (-) 20. 9020 1 500. 500. i0000. 75. 100. 2500. 8000. 2500. 1000. 20. 3500. 2000. 100. 500. 700. 2400. 5000. Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than"° (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin p~c T#OL £UM LABORATORIES, II-lC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 ATTN: Bryan McNabb Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-4 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample Description: Total Metals, m~/k~ ~gmple Results Valley Olds, 2/9/88, East Waste Oil Tank @ 6', sampled by; David Rittenhouse Title 22 Method Reference Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead 3.70 Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanides Phenols Sulfides Fluorides Hexavalent Chromium Oil & Grease 58. pH Pensky-Martens Flash Point PCB's TOX, ug/g (-) 20. TTLC~ m~/kg 7040 1 7061 1 7080 1 210.1 2 7130 1 7190 1 291.1 2 220.1 2 7421 1 7471 1 246.1 2 7520 1 7741 1 7760 1 279.1 2 286.1 2 289.1 2 9010 420.1 2 9030 1 340.2 2 7196 1 500. 500. 10000. 75. 100. 2500. 8000. 2500. 1000. 20. 3500. 2000. 100. 500. 700. 2400. 5000. 9040 1 1010 1 8080 1 9020 1 Comment: . ~11 contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis, Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin PETROLEU¥ McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 ATTN: Bryan McNabb LABORATORIF?-,, Ir-lC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHERA. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-5 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample Description: Valley sample, Total Metals~ mg/kg Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanides Phenols Sulfides Fluorides Hexavalent Chromium Oil & Grease pH Pensky-Martens Flash Point PCB's I TOX, ug/g Olds, 2/9/88, North Waste Oil Tank @ 2' by; David Rittenhouse Title 22 Sample Results Method Reference 15326. 2O. 39.8 TTLC, mg/kg 7040 1 7061 1 7080 i 210.1 2 7130 1 7190 1 291.1 2 220.1 2 7421 1 7471 1 246.1 2 7520 1 7741 1 7760 1 279.1 2 286.1 2 289.1 2 9010 1 420.1 2 9030 1 340.2 2 7196 1 500. 500. 10000. 75. 100. 2500. 8000. 2500. 1000. 20. 3500. 2000. 100. 500. 700. 2400. 5000. 9040 1 1010 1 8080 1 9020 1 Comment: Ail contaminants r~ported abovm are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjecte~ to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) re[ers to less than". (1) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes , SW 846, July, 1982 (2) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, ~4-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin £#£~1CA~ A#A~ Y$15 PE T#OL £1J¥ McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 933£8 ATTN: Bryan McNabb Sample Description: Total Metals, m~/.k~ LABORATORIES, InC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-6 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Valle~ Olds, 2/9/88, North Waste Oil Tank @ 6' sampled by; David k[ttenhouse Title 22 Sample Results Method Reference 50.4 92141. 20. Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanides Phenols Sulfides Fluorides Hexavalent Chromium Oil & Grease pH Pensky-Martens Flash Poi t PCB's TOX, ug/g TTLC, mg/kg 7040 1 7061 1 7080 1 210.1 2 7130 1 7190 1 291.1 2 220.1 2 7421 1 7471 1 246.1 2 7520 1 7741 1 7760 1 279.1 2 286.1 2 289.1 2 9010 1 420.1 2 9030 340.2 2 7196 1 500. 500. I0000. 75. 100. 2500. 8000. 2500. 1000. 20. 3500. 2000. 100. 500. 700. 2400. 5000. 9040 1010 8080 9020 Comment: Ail contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (w~t) sample basis;. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "le3s than". (i) "Test Methods for EvalUating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical knalysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin AG#ICU~ TUllE C#£~IICAI Ail~Al YSlS p~CT/IOL£U~ McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 9330~ ATTN: Bryan McNabb LABORATORIES. I r"lC. J. J. EGLIN, REG. (;HERA. ENGll. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-7 Sample Description: Total Metals~ m~/k~ TOTAL EXTRACT CONTAMINANTS BY ACID DIGESTION ValleyI Olds, 2/9/88, North Waste Oil Tank Line @ 2' sample~ by; David Rittenhouse / Title 22 Sample Results. Method Reference TTLC~ mg/kg 590. Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanides Phenols Sulfides Fluorides Hexavalent Chromium Oil & Grease Pensky-Martens Flash Poi t PCB's J 67823. 7040 I 500. 7061 1 500. 7080 1 10000. 210.1 2 75. 7130 1 100. 7190 1 2500. 291.1 2 8000. 220.1 2 2500. 7421 1 1000. 7471 1 20. 246.1 2 3500. 7520 1 2000. 7741 1 100. 7760 1 500. 279.1 2 700. 286.1 2 2400. 289.1 2 5000. 9010 1 420.1 2 9030 1 340.2 2 7196 I 9040 1 1010 1 8080 1 TOX, ug/g (-) 20. 9020 Comment: Ail contaminants ~eported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as-received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "le~s than". (1) "Test Methods for Eval4ating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical ~nalysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin ANAL Y$15 PET#OL£1JI~ LABORATORIES, In :. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGI~. 4100 PIEIICE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 McNabb Construction 7808 Olcott Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 ATTN: Bryan McNabb Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 02/17/88 02/09/88 1086-8 TOTAL EXTRACT CONTA24INANTS BY ACID DIGESTION Sample Description: Total Metals, m~/k~ Antimony 7040 1 Arsenic 7061 1 Barium 7080 1 Beryllium 210.1 2 Cadmium 7130 1 Chromium 7190 1 Cobalt 291.1 2 Copper 220.1 2 Lead 11.8 7421 1 Mercury 7471 1 Molybdenum 246.1 2 Nickel 7520 1 Selenium 7741 1 Silver 7760 1 Thallium 279.1 2 Vanadium 286.1 2 Zinc 289.1 2 Cyanides 9010 1 Phenols 420.1 2 Sulfides 9030 1 Fluorides 340.2 2 Hexavalent Chromium 7196 1 Oil & Grease 1428. pH 9040 Pensky-Martens Flash Point 1010 1 PCB's 8080 1 TOX, ug/g (-) 20. 9020 1 Valley Olds, 2/9/88, North Waste Oil Tank Line @ 6' sampled by; David Rittenhouse Title 22 Sample Results Method Reference TTLC~ m~/k~ 500. 500. i0000. 75. 100. 2500. 8000. 2500. 1000. 20. 3500. 2000. 100. 500. 700. 2400. 5000. Comment: All contaminants reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis;. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. (-) refers to "less than". (1) "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes", SW 846, July, 1982. (2) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600, 14-79-020 B C LABORATORIES, INC. BY J. J. Eglin 1~;00 Flower Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Facility Name lie Address HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. kdRN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN] ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Relohard Kern County Permit # A4/z-/ * * UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION Txa ING RECORD * * This form is to be returned to tile Kern County Health Department within 14 days of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling facility. The holder of the permit with number not:ed above is responsible for insuring that this form is completed and returncd. Section 1 - To be filled out by tank removaJ[ contra, ctor: Tank Removal Contractor: /~~~ ~~. ~o Address ?~0~ (')[C~ ~/~ P~one ~ ~¢--~~ Date Tanks ~e~oved ~/~ NO. o~ Tanks ~ Section 2 - To be filled out ~ contractor "decontaminating" tank(s): 'rank "Decontamination" Contractor ~'~ ~ ~~~[/~ Address ~ ~ ¢ ~Af/~ ~. Phone ~ ~'~ 2 ~0 Authorized cepresentatlve of conCrac~or certifies by signing belo~ that tank(s) have been decontaminated in accordance with Kern County Health Department ¢'equirement{. ',~ ~~ ~l~ure Title Section 3 - To be filled our and signed by an authorizod representative of the treatment, storage, or disposal ~ac~lSt~ acceptinff tank{s): Facility Name · Address 2202 S. MILLIKEN AVE. ONTAIRO, CA Date Tanks Received .FEBRUARY 10, 1988 Slgnature ~/~'~//.A~{~¢~'~.~/ Title (A hot epresentative) AMERICAN METAL RECYLCING; INC. Phone #(714)947-2888 Zip . ~17~1 No. of Tanks ~ OFFICE MANAGFR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS: Fold in half and staple. Postage and mailing label have already been affixed to outside for your convenience. D~STmCrOmCES Telel~one (805) -HEALTH D E ., H~z.,m o~-~ ENVIRONMENTAL. ItEALTH DIVISION-' LeealI~~I&D.'.: Bate__ Firm Name' ~/~ Address 2~~/~ ' ~/,-, ' Person Inte~iew;~" ~~ ~'~ DIRECTOR'OF' E~!RQI~., ~ At. HEALTH' ,. V~m.. 8~ R~md :', · ':. ,::;.' ;, :: '~..;.?;'<~:,:.:,.; , HAZARDOUS. MATERIALS Underground Tank Faciiity ~,,,~,, EPA I.B. # Assessors Parcel ~ , NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY The following conditions or practices observed this date are violations of one or more sections of the Califo~"nia Health and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage, handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8, "Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances." Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below: z - t~ ----Y, ~ < .' ,/ I -/ / ./ · /, / I- ' ., - I r~ . -- -'' / ' / ~/ // / / /' , I_ ~,~: - tl .... // / .... / ' -- .. , - ;' .¢' // ,, /. ~ ' . / { // /' /' /. ~ / - . _ i - . z:,"., '- ,..>' w' <,:',<:.xu:,->-' :-z,b,r.,,v',,'¢' ..-? ,:/" Your signature acknowledges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above, and is not an admission of guilt. Failure to fully com,.ply with this "Notice and Order" may result in further legal action by County or State officials. "' ' "';,:-.,',6." /'/ / / '? 't ... : ~ (..,,'./ ,,'C.._.~j ..... Owner or AOthorized Representative Agent of the Kern County Health Officer White -- Original Canary -- Facility file Pink -- Specialist o 2300,.u-H*.?~. Street* ,:..:.~- ,.*,~,. ?, ~ -:-,'.~i: 2300,:. H.., S~ree,t - ' : '-'.':~* .... ' · ' 'Phone..~ (805). 327-42I'r:~ PE~IT'. FOR' CLOSU~ OF ,* ,.'*:f~' -PE~IT EXPIRES 3 T (S) ,, : .. P OVAL.,DAT LOCATION. -* ' * ~PROVED BY POST CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW: It ts the responsibility of the Permittee- required by other regulatory agencies prior b. A minimum of two samples two feet and six .feet for near the dispenser area(s) f)' , Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department~* p'e,rntt,'i; closure action. ':-',',,.*:.~!i~'.. .. Tank closure activities must be per Kern.County,,.' approved methods as described in Handout SUT'-30~'.:' ' If any contractors other than those llsted on permit and=-~.., are to be utilized prior approwil must be granted~.(t~Y[i'.t/he.~j_spec[*,allst listed on the permit. .. Tank removal contractor must have a qualified='company~fj[:emp,lp~ee~(;'on~site supervising the actual tank removal. . . · _.. Any deviation from sample locations and numbers o~ co:nstttue~nIs:-:.to' be saapled for which are described below and In prior aPproval by the Health Department. , ... a. A alninum of two samples must be retrieved beneath'-'.t~e~en~er?'of:""each waste oil tank and the gasoline tank at depths 'o~*' app~oXtna~ely two feet and six feet. *-' ' .... :::~';~':~:'*":'*:'~"'~'J~';*:/~:~*~':"~ ' must be retrieved''at: every 15 ltnear'fee~ and drains. '. .... ~"..' ' · i m us t:."' ~ eL 'a n a:l,y z'e dY;' fo:r: .~{t'olt a i. ':.o r"ga ni' c-'(lia4i:de;s.;:, o 8 Cop,ies. 'of ':"tra. nsportation~. manl'fes.ts>, mus. t. Department'w'ithtn five' days of Waste disposal 9,. Ail applicable state.., laws 'for' hazardous waste-.-'di'sposa.1..,~ treatment~ must.':' be':~'adhered to. .The. Kern:Coun.tyq"i~e~a~lkth~ notified before .moving and/or disposing.of any 10. Permtttee-'i's responsible,: for making sure 11. record" issued with this. permit is properly 1~ days of tank removal.- Advise' this office of the time and date of hours advance notice~ Results must be- submitted to this office completion, g filled::!· . n the :~: prop '.wt~t'h:*j:-' 24 wi thi*~. · thr e; i'iY s/i s' ' . ' ~-'-'4 ~ ' APPROVED BY DATE KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1700 FLOWER STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA {805) 861-3636 93305 INTERNAL USE ONLY:{-. # OF TANKS TO BE ABANDONED LENGTH OF PIPING TO ABANDON APPL T CATI ON FOR I:~ERI~II T FOR PERI~ENT CLOSURE/ABANDONI~IENT OF UNDERGROUND HAZ,~DOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILTTY THIS APPLICATION IS FOR ~REMOVAL, OR [] ABANDONMENT IN PLACE (FILL OUT ONE APPLICATION PER FACILITY) PROJECT CONTACT ,, ]PHONE # ]SEC/T/R (RURAL LOCATIONS ONLY) FACILITY NAME [ADDRESS ~ NEAREST CROSS STREET )TANK ~E~?V.AL COI~TRACT~ IADDRESS ...-.. ]PHONE NORKER'S COMPENSATION LABO~..~y THAT WILL ANALYZE SAMPLES INSURER ~U~ESS PHONE _(.~..~ -- PHONE !CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ~$TERIALS STORED TANK # VOLUME CHEMICAL STORED (NON-COMMERCIAL NAME) DATES STORED CHEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORE{ ./ /'f ¢.r~ tJ-~3L. ('"dM-% / V 5'-TTG /_980 TO tP/ATF~O FACILITY PROVIDED BY {NEAREST WATER W~L~ - OIW DISTANCE AND OESCRIBE TYPE IF WITHIN 500 FEET ,IBASIS FOB S0~L TYPE ~D OROUNDWATER DEPTH DETE~INATION~ /,F' ' ' ITOTAL NUMBER OF 8~PLE8 TO BE ANALYZED IS~PLES I IDEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SOIL TYPE AT FACILITY Di~I~I~BE HOW RESIDUE IN TANK(S) AND PIPING IS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TJi~NSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COMPANIES): ./ ~ · , . C-.' ' ' ~ ~ i ' · DESCRIBE B~TII~HE DISPOSAL METHOD~ DISPOSA~C~LON .FOR: , {' /~ J Ih ' ~ . ~ ~, ~ ~ '~ ~/ ~,~ ~,~ f / . ,. ~., , ,) ~.~ , , ., ¢ · . , · * PLEASE PROVIDE INFO~TION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THiS SHEET BEFORE SUBMITTING APPLICATIO~ FOR REVIEW ' ' THIS FORM HAS' BEE~ COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDOE IS TRUE AND CORRECT. TITLE (Form #HMMP-140)- :700 '~' ~creet. ~te. 300 ~akersf~e]O. Ch 93301 (805) 861-3536 KERN C OUNT%~ £nv~ronmemm/ Heait~ Department Mr. Cecil Bailey Dr. Robert Hunington 3939 Bernard St. ~6 Bakersfield, CA 93306 14', 1989 SUBJECT: Location: 2300 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Known As: Valley Oldsmobile West PERMIT #: 160041 Dear Mr. Cecil Bailey: This letter is an official notice to inform you, a responsible party for the above described site, of your options for oversight cost recovery. As previously notified, you are a responsible party for a site determined to have an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank and are required to provide for all studies and work relating to the above described property: see attachment "A". The costs incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan. site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two ways described below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under the terms of the (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These options ONLY pertain to current and future costs associated with oversight, and you will not be "back-billed" or retroactively charged for previous oversight costs. (A) STATE CONTRACT The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract, The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site. (B) COUNTY LOCAL AGREF_J4ENT Kern County Environmental Health .is providing this option for those who prefer to pay the County directly and avoid the addition of State costs. Prior DISTRICT OI-'FI'CES Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants · Engineering and Chemical Laboratories October 18, 1990 Kern County Department of Environmental Health Service 2700 "M" Street, Suite 500 Bakersfield, California 93301 Attn: Mr. Joe Canas RE: Remedial Investigation - Valley Oldsmobi 2300 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr. Canas: This letter has been prepared at your request to address the remediation alternatives previously recommended on a preliminary basis in Twining's Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (TL 989-090- 00) dated March 6, 1990 for the above referenced site. Specifically, this letter discusses for each remedial action alternative: The short and long term effects of each remedial action alternative on the public health and the 'environment. An estimated cost analysis for each alternative on a preliminary basis. The technical feasibility of each alternative and its applicability to the site. Finally, the letter presents to your department Twining's proposed remedial action alternative for the site based on the findings and conclusions of the RI report and from discussions held with you and Mr. Cecil Bailey, the Responsible Party (RP), regarding [2] 2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472 Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021 [] 9401 West Goshen Avenue Visalia, California 93291 · (209)651-2190 [] 1405 Granite Lane, Suite 1 [] 3701 Pegasu_s Dr. ive,. S~i.te_ _124 . Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 2 the project. Briefly, the RI report prepared for Isaacs and Bailey concluded that soils containing elevated concentrations of oil and grease constituents exist in the on-site soils beneath the former 550-gallon underground waste oil tank to a depth of between 11.0 feet and 16.5 feet below site grade (BSG). The lateral extent of the zone of soils containing oil and grease constituents was estimated to be approximately 12 feet in diameter and centered on the former tank location. It was also concluded that the estimated volume of affected soils probably does not exceed 70 cubic yards in volume. The results of the laboratory analyses of the soils samples analyzed during the investigation are presented below. Analytical Results of Soil Sample Analyses Boring Sample Oil and Grease, Total Lead, Number Depth, ft. mg/kq mq/kq B-1 B-2 mg/kg MDL ND NA 6.0 - 6.5 11.0 - 11.5 16.0 - 16.5 21.0 - 21.5 74,000 NA 15 NA 10 NA 10 NA 6.0 - 6.5 35 3 11.0 - 11.5 10 NA 16.0 - 16.5 5 3 21.0 - 21.5 50 4 26.0 - 26.5 ND 4 = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) = Method Detection Limit = None detected or above MDL = Not analyzed Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 3 Boring Number Analytical Results of Soil Sample Analyses Sample Oil and Grease, Total Lead, Depth, ft. mq/kq mq/kq B-3 B-4 6.0 - 6.5 13,000 NA 11.0 - 11.5 33,000 NA 16.0 - 16.5 30 NA 6.0 - 6.5 35 NA 11.0 - 11.5 40 NA 16.0 - 16.5 45 NA MDL 5 0.5 mg/kg MDL ND NA = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) = Method Detection Limit = None detected or above MDL = Not analyzed The soils containing elevated concentrations of oil and grease constituents are separated from groundwater by at least 125 feet and no perched groundwater conditions were identified or are known to exist in the area of the site. The average annual rainfall in Bakersfield is approximately 6-inches per year. No man-made conduits which could increase the potential for additional migration of the hydrocarbons were identified during the investigation and the site is paved with asphaltic concrete. The RI report also concluded that a portion of the affected soils probably exists beneath the structure located adjacent to the former underground tank location. Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 4 Because there are currently no local or state regulatory guidelines for maximum allowable concentrations for oil and grease that can be left in place within the vadose zone, it is necessary to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the existing on-site conditions as a specific case based on the site specific conditions. The following remedial action alternatives were presented in the RI report: 1. No action 2. Excavation and disposal at a "Class I" disposal unit 3. Bioremediation methods The remedial action alternatives are discussed in the following paragraphs. The no action remedial alternative would involve leaving in- place approximately 70 cubic yards of soils containing elevated concentrations of oil and grease constituents. Concentrations of oil and grease ranging from 33,000 ppm to 74,000 ppm exist in the on-site soils to a depth of approximately 12 feet BSG. The estimated vertical extent of the affected soils is separated from groundwater by approximately 125 feet. Because'of its low viscosity and low volatility, oil and grease constituents do not readily migrate vertically in soil as do the lighter hydrocarbons. Therefore, it is unlikely that the oil and grease constituents would migrate through the vadose (unsaturated) zone and encounter Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 5 groundwater. The source of the oil and grease is believed to be waste oil generated from the automobile service facility located on the site. California law currently classifies waste oil as a hazardous substance under the Hazardous Waste Control Law (Health and Safety Code Section 25100). Because the site is located in a populated area the potential exists for the soils to present a health and safety hazard. In addition, the site may be redeveloped in the future, increasing the potential for workers and others to be exposed to the soils during demolition and construction activities. The no action alternative may also pose a potential concern to the site with respect to the future marketability of the property because this alternative would not result in a clean closure. Twining's conversations with Kern County Environmental Health Department (KCEHD) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board representatives have concluded 'that because of the relatively high concentrations of oil and grease that exist in the on-site soils it may be advisable to remediate the site and attempt to obtain a clean closure. The costs associated with the no action alternative would be limited to the expense of disposing of the drill cuttings currently stored on the site and for repaving the area of the lateral extent of the affected area with an impermeable layer to further reduce the Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 6 potential for migration of the hydrocarbons and to protect the public from possible exposure to the soils. Based on the relatively higlh concentrations of oil and grease, the potential for threat to the public health, the potential for future impact on the property, and the unlikelihood for gaining regulatory approval, the no action alternative does not appear feasible for the site. The excavation and disposal remedial action alternative involves physically removing the soils containing elevated concentrations of oil and grease from the site and transporting them to a Class I (Hazardous Waste) disposal facility. It is estimated that approximately 105 tons of soil would require excavation and disposal to achieve this. Advantages of the excavation and disposal alternative include mitigating any potential threats to the public health and the environment that may exist as a result of the on-site conditions and also obtaining a clean closure for the site, thereby, eliminating the possibility of any future economic concerns to the site and the property owner. Prior to being accepted at a Class I disposal site, the affected soils would require laboratory analyses to classify the waste and determine its acceptability status. The classification of the waste would determine the cost for disposal. If it is Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 7 determined that the soils contain hazardous concentrations of metals, then the cost of disposal will be approximately $110.00 per ton. If it is determined that the soil is not hazardous then the disposal cost would be substantially reduced to approximately $11.00 per ton. The disposal costs could range from approximately $1,155.00 to approximately $11,550.00 to adequately remediate the site. The other estimated costs associated with the excavation and disposal method are presented below. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR THE EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVE Activity Cost Remedial Action Plan Permits Excavation Transportation (105 cubic yards) Waste Disposal Fees: ($770.00/$7,700.00 Non-hazardous/Hazardous) Backfill and compaction Paving Chemistry Project Management $ 2,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ .1,000.00 Estimated Total : $ 10,200.00 Although the costs associated with this remedial alternative are greater than the no action alternative, they are probably less than for other methods of remediation that could be used to Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 8 remediate the site. Based on the cost effectiveness in comparison with other methods which are discussed below, and the other advantages previously discussed, the excavation and disposal remedial action alternative is considered feasible for the site. The bioremediation remedial action alternative involves excavating the affected soils and introducing microorganisms into the soil which then attack and degrade hydrocarbons within a controlled environment. Advantages to this method are that it can eliminate the short and long term liabilities resulting from off- site transportation and disposal, it can achieve a clean closure, and it can be a cost effective method for treating large quantities of soil. Disadvantages of the method include: lack of effectiveness in treating soils containing high concentrations of oil and grease, the methods do not work on soils containing metals, the soil requires excavation, and the method is often not cost effective when treating relatively small quantities of soil. It is estimated that the costs required to bioremediate the soils at the site would be approximately $20,000 or a unit cost of approximately $190.00 per ton. Because of the relatively small quantity of soil involved, the high concentrations of oil and grease, the possibility that the soils may contain metals, and the relatively high unit cost per ton, Twining concludes that bioremediation is probably not a feasible alternative to remediate the site. Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 9 Upon review of the feasibility of each remedial action alternative presented, Twining recommends that the soils containing elevated concentrations of oil and grease and possibly metals be remediated by excavating and transporting them to a Class I disposal site. It is our opinion that this remedial alternative is a feasible, cost effective method that best serves the interest of the environment, the public health, and the client with respect to future environmental and economical liabilities which may result from the existing on-site conditions. If the proposed remedial action alternative is considered acceptable to the KCEHD it will be necessary to prepare a Remedial Action Plan and Health and Safety Plan for submittal to the KCEHD prior to implementing the proposed remedial action. The report will address the technical approaches that will be followed to adequately mitigate the on-site conditions and to dispose of the material generated by the remedial action. Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health October 18, 1990 Page 10 Thank you for your patience in this matter. any questions or require any additional hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC. Bruce M. Bly~he Project Manager BMB:km lc: herewith If you should have information please do not Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield TO TWINING LABORA I IIES, INC. P.O. Box 1472 Fresno, CA 93716 (209) 268-7021 DATE ~ ~ ~ ~,, ~ I JOB NO, ATrENTION: i..~_~ ! ~! ,~..._ I, WE ARE SENDING YOU i~;~LAttached [] Under separate cover via the following items: [] Drawings [] Specifications E] Plans [] Samples , [] Copy of letter [] Invoices ~;[ //~.l~tJ ~ ~ _[~-,~'~O1~> I I [] Brochures [] Copy of Report COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval ~ For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment Approved as submitted [] Resubmit Approved as noted [] Submit.__ Returned for corrections ~ For Signature copies for approval copies for distribution REMARKS COPY TO Fo~: ENVIRONMENTAL H~.a,L T~,. Examination /,.I ,~,~ z.- Sample: Received: Identification: TEST RESULTS Oil and Grease mg/kg ~ ~-I I~.~' t¢.'~ lo ND: None Detected Method Detection Limit: 5mg/kg mg/kg: milligram per kilogram on an as received basis Method: EPA Method 413.1 adapted for soils Examination Sample: /~ soils Received: O(~O~fZ' 7¢' Identification: ~EST RESULTS Oil and Grease mg/kg /( £-Z Iv°.-~~~ /~ ~-~ /o".-t/~ TWINING LABORATORIES ND: None Detected Method Detection Limit:'5mg/kg mg/kg: milligram per kilogram on an as received basis Method: EPA Method 413.1 adapted for soils CAM:Solid samples, HNO3 digest 1.00~/100ml Examination ~/~ Page Sample: Soil CAM Metals Result MDL ~%~Antimony(Sb),total,mg/kg as received ~ ?gfArsenic(As),total,mg/kg as received ...... ~.~ ~Barium(Ba),total,mg/kg as received ............. 5~ ,~%Beryllium('Be)',total,mg/kg as received .......... 0.% ~admium(Cd),total,mg/kg as received ~5 0~ ~hromium(Cr),total,mg/kg as received ......... D~,~ ~obalt(Co),total,mg/kg as received ~0 ~opper(Cu),total,mg/kg as received ............... ~{% ,V~Lead(Pb),total,mg/kg as received ..................... % '~ ?7~Mercury(Hg) ,total,mg/kg as received ........... 6>.~ .~Molybdenum(Mo),to~al,mg/kg as received ~0 ~Nickel(Ni),total,mg/kg as received ~0 ??~Selenium(Se) ,total,mg/kg as received ~O ~Silver(Ag),total,mg/kg as received NO ~/~Thallium(T1),total,mg/kg as received ~ ~ ~anadium(V),total,mg/kg as received ............ 5~9 J~ ~inc(Zn},to~al,mg/kg as received ................ ~%%~ 100 0.5 0.5 0.1 1 1 5 5 0.1 5 0.5 3 1 5 2 mg/kg:milligram per kilogram ND:none detected MDL:Method detection limit Method of Analysis: 1) 2) B) 4) 5) 6) Digest-3050 (HNO~ digest) . /z-/~ Arsenic-7061 (hydride) Mercury-7470 (cold vapor) Selenium-774t (hydride) Thallium-7841 (graphite furnace) Remaining metals-6010 (ICP) Reference: "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods", SW-$46, 2nd edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982. ................ ~$t~~ Sample: Received: Identification ~ST RESULTS soils ¢ Examination Oil and Grease mE/kE 'T~NINING LABORATORIES ND: None Detected Method Detection Limit: 5mg/kE mE/kg: milligram per kilogram on an as received basis Method: EPA Method ~13.1 adapted for soils Examination Sample: /~ soil.~ Received: OC(~:/~-' -~'~, (~'2 Identification: TEST RESULTS Oil and Grease mg/kg Z. 'E,- t Il. :'- f'~-. g ~ ~-I i7-,~- t?.':. Io 0 V-z- Io'- (~" lo ND: None Detected Method Detection Limit: 5mg/kg mg/kg: milligram per kilogram on an as received basis Method: EPA Method 413.1 adapted for soils CAM:Solid samples, HNO3 digest 1.00¢/100ml Examination ~/~ Page Sample: Soil Received: Lab IDS: /2 Client ID: CAM Metals Result ~NININ6 .LABORATORIES MDL .%~Antimony(Sb) ,total,mg/kg as re ~?fArsenic(As) ,total,mg/kg as rec ~a~Barium(Ba) ,to%al,rog/kg as .fete ~%Beryllium(Be) ,total,mg/kg as r ~admium(Cd) ,total,mg/kg as rec ~5 ~hromium(Cr),total,mg/kg as re ~;~%~obalt(Co) ,total,mg/kg as rece ~opper(Cu) ,total,mg/kg as rece ceived ~ eived ~.~ ived .............. 5% eceived .......... 0.% eived ~ ceived ........... ]~,~ j. ved ~0 ived ................ ~% ,v~ead(Pb),total,mg/kg as received ...................... ~ '7 ?~Mercury(Hg) ,total,mg/kg as received ~Molybdenum(Mo) ,total,mg/kg as received ~h%Nickel(Ni),total,mg/kg as received ............. ?~Selenium(Se),total,mg/kg as received ........... ~'O ~Silver(Ag),total,mg/kg as received NO ~/:~Thallium(T1),total,mg/kg as received ~ ~anadium(V) ,total,mg/kg as received ............. .l~~~~inc(Zn) to=al,mg/kg as received ................. 100 0.5 0;5 0.1 1 1 5 5 0.1 5 0.5 1 5 2 mg/kg:milligram per kilogram · ND:none detected MDL:Method detection limit Method of Analysis: 1) 2) 3) 4') 5) 6) Digest-3050 (HNO3 digest) . Il-/'~ Arsenic-706i (hydride) Mercury-7470 (cold vapor) Selenium-7741 (hydride) Thallium-7841 (graphite furnace Remaining metals-6010 (ICP) Reference: "Test Methods for Evalua%~ng Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods", SW-846, 2nd ediuion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982. //6J ' 8Y CHKD. BY ~ DATE SUBJECT PROJECT ' NUMBER ,SHEET NO. 1' OF ( i I j i AFFIDAVfl' ~,ID RECORD OF DEPOSIT /~EC..~ee.2~m~ GOV. CO0! DEPT 10-15 THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF KERN COUNTY, HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE AMOUNT DUE THE TREASURY OF SAID COUNTY FOR MONEYS COLLECTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF KERN IS THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS($ 1,000.00 I IN SETTLEMENT OF THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS. DESCRIPTION OF DEPOSIT FUND DEPT. DiV. REVENUE PROJECT FUND NO. NO. NO. CODE AMOUNT (OPTIONAL) i TOTAL Local Option Trust 112 ia a l~ a ~ ~ Colt Program 112177067 &&ll3 I& t~5730 a 1.000.00 a I 1,000.00 Valley Olds West 112 & & t, a a 1 ?ermit # 160041-1372 112 i& 'l ~ i~ la I& l 12 ~ · ~, ~ ~ 112 & & & & & 112 & ~ & & & & ' 112 & & & & 112 & & & & & SEgTION ~8~1 GOVErNmENT gODE TOTAL ~EPO~IT ~ 0~$ $ 1,000.00 HEREBY SWEAR THAT THIS IS A TRUE AN~ DUE THE KERN COUNTY TREASURER TO AND !NCLUDING mE 17 DAYOF March 19 8_~__~ ARTMENT'S AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Betty A. Marion, Account Clerk II THE COUNTY TREASURER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THE DEPOSIT DESCRIBED ABOVE. DEPUTY AUD~TOR,,CONTROLLER DATE ORIG ~ 1ST COPY 2ND COPY 3RD COPY 4TH COPY COPY DISTRIBUTION WHITE TREASURER'S AUTHORIZATION WHITE AUDICONTR. AFFIDAVIT PINK AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-ALPHA G'ROD DEPOSITING DEPT.-RECEIPT GREEN DEPARTMENT- MEMO RECEIPT IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED OF THE DEPOSIT DESCRIBED ABOVE. BY DEPUTY COUNTY TRF..A~ Associated Environmental Systems P.O. Box 80427 Bakersfield, CA 93380 (805) 393-2212 To whom it may concern, AES will be conducling a precision leak test on at this address: V a i i e y 01 d s 09-08-8~ 0600 a.m., p.m. 2300 H St Bakersfield, CA Ph. # 805 327-4211 Thank You. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDER FOR APPLICATION TO BE PRfXIESS~ TANK(S), PIPING & DISPENSER(S) , INCLUDING LENGTHS AND DIMENSIONS PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATIONS DESIGNATED BY THIS SYMBOL "(~" NEAREST STREET OR INTERStDCTION --~ANY WATER W~l,l~q OR SURFACE WATERS WITHIN 100' RADIUS OF FACILITY NORTH ARROW ;