HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION 3/29/1991TL 988-099-07
C-1
Appendix C
Copy of in-place density test report TL 988-099-08
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants · Engineering and Chemical Laboratories
March 29, 1991
TL 988-99-08
For:
Isaacs & Bailey
2707 "F' Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
Attn: Mr. Cecil Bailey
Project:
VALLEY OLDSMOBILE
2300 "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Subject:
Soil Density Testing
Dear Mr. Bailey:
This report presents the results .of in-place density tests conducted
on the backfill soils placed in a tank excavation located at the
above referenced project site.
The scope of our testing was authorized and directed by Mr. Cecil
Bailey, a representative with Isaacs & Bailey.
These tests were conducted by the following personnel of The
Twining Laboratories, Inc.: Mr. Bruce Blythe on March 25, 1991, and
Mr. Mark Goehring on March 26, 1991.
Project Specifications:
In accordance with the Remedial
Action Plan dated March 19, 1991,
prepared by The Twining Laboratories,
Inc.; the backfill materials shall be
moisture conditioned as necessary and
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent
of the maximum dry density as
determined by ASTM Test Method D-
1557.
2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472
Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021
['3 9401 West Goshen Avenue
Visalia, California 93291 · (209)651-2190
1405 Granite Lane. Suite I ~1~ 3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 124
Isaacs & Bailey
TL 988-99-08
Page 2
Results of Maximum Density-Optim~n Moisture Determinations
(ASTM Test Method D1557, Method Al)
Sample Location
Material Maximum Dry Density, Optimum
No. PCF Moisture, %
Composite of
material sampled
on jobsite
1 113.3 7.8
Results of In-Place Density Tests
(ASTM Test Method D2922/Nuclear Gauge with 12 inch Probe)
Test Test
No. Date
1. 3/25
2. 3/25
3. 3/25
4. 3/26
5. 3/26
6. 3/26
7. 3/26
8. 3/26
Mate-
rial
Test Location No.
Tank Excavation 1
Tank Excavation 1
Tank Excavation 1
Tank Excavation 1
E. End
Tank Excavation
15'W. of E. End
Tank Excavation
25'W. of E. End
Tank Excavation 1
20'W. of E. End
Tank Excavation 1
30'W. of E. End
Depth
Below In-
Assumed Place
Final Dry
Mois-
Grade, Density, ture,
Inches PCF %
96-104 101.8 8.0
60-68 105.0 11.5
36-44 106.3 10.9
0-8 103.0 12.7
Rel. Req.
Comp., Comp.,
% %
90.0 90
92.6 90
93.8 90
91.1 90
1 12-20 106.8 13.0 94.2 90
1 12-20 106.3 7.0 93.8 90
0-8 110.0 11.6 97.0 90
0-8 106.8 8.3
94.2 90
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
Isaacs & Bailey
TL 988-99-08
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
This .report only presents the test data and results at the
locations and depths tested. Test locations and elevations were
visually determined from existing site features. The locations and
elevations .of the tests should be considered accurate only to the
degree implied by the method used..
The relative compaction of the backfill soils, at the locations
tested, complies with the min:bmum requirements stated in the
Remedial Action Plan submitted for this project.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this
project. Should you have any questions concerning the information
provided, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
Scott A. Goehring /
Field Supervisor/Bakersfield Office
SAG/km
3c: herewith
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
PROCTOR TEST REPORT
114
112
111
110
109
? 8 9 18 11 12
N~tep content~ ~.
ASTM I~ 1557 Method A
#Hodi.Fied# P~octo~,
Elev/
Depth
CIA=si.FicAt ion
N~.t.
FIo i st.
Sp.G. LL PI
USCS AASHTO
0-12# N/A H/A N/A ~ 2.40 H/A N/A H/A ~
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL ~ESCRIPTIOH
~. > INo. 200
No. 4
Optimum moistupe = 2.8 Y.
M~xim~m dpv density = 11~.~
P~o~ect Ho.: TL 988-99
Project: VALLEY OLdSMObILE
Locttion: 2500 #H# STREET
STATE SAN~
Remarks:
SAMPLED ~Y: M. GOEHRIHG
LOCATIOH: OH-SITE
BAKERSFIEL~ CALIFORNIA
~te: ~-29-91
PROCTOR TEST REPORT
THE TWINING LA~ORATORIES, ]:NC.
SAHPLE ~ATE:
~ig~e Ho. i
Sp.8.=
2.40
APPENDIX B
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07 B-1
Appendix B
Copies of waste profile documentation and hazardous
waste manifests
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
Chemic .. Waste Managen, nt, Inc.
WASTE PROFILE
AL 7949
Profile #
[] Check here if this is a Recertification
LOCATION OF ORIGINAL
[
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. GENERATOR NAME: R~RF. RT W. HT~TTNC. TON
2. Generator Address: 9'~/~1"i "T4" KTRFI~T
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORN:LA. 93301
3. Technical ContactJPhone: RRI'TC~ RT.VTT-TI~/(.805 )
4. Alternate ContactJPhone:
F. NTFRPRTRES. TNC, Generator USEPA ID:
Billing Address: [] Same 2707 "F" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301
~9~-5088
BillingContact/Phone: CECIL BAILEY/(805~ 327-2065
PROPERTIES AND COMPOSITION
5. Process Generating Waste:
CT.I~.ANTTP NV
.qI3TT, CONTAHTNATTON RESULTTNC FROM LFA[TNG UST
6. Waste Name: OIL AND GREASE CONTAMINATED SOIL
7A. Is this a USEPA hazardous waste (40 CFR Part 261)? Yes [] No ~:
B. Identify ALL USEPA listed and characteristic waste code numbers (D.F,K,P,U): NA
State Waste Codes: 6 1 l
8. Physical State @ 70°F: A. Solid ~: Liquid [] Both [] B. Single Layer [] Multilayer [] C. Free liquid range to %
9A. pH: Range R _ 1 to or Not applicable t~ B. Strong Odor []; describe
10. Liquid Flash Point: < 73°F L~ 73.99OF [] 100.139OF [] 140.199OF [] ~ 200oF r-I, N.A. ~ Closed Cup [] Open Cup []
11. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: List ALL constituents (including halogenatec organics) present in any concentration and forward available analysis.
Constituents Range Units Constituents Range Units
SOIL O- 100 percent
TOTAL COMPOSITION MUST EQUAL OR EXCEED 100%
12. OTHER: PCBs if yes, concentration __ ppm, PCBs regulated by 40 CFR 761 [-"].
Benzene if yes, concentration __ ppm. Shock Sensitive [] Oxidizer []
13. If the waste is subject to the land ban and meets the treatment standards, check here:
Pyrophoric [] Explosive [] Radioactive []
Carcinogen [] Infectious [] Other
, and supply analytical results where applicable.
SHIPPING INFORMATION
14. PACKAGING: Bulk Solid
Bulk Liquid [] Drum [] Type/Size: Other
1 2~ Units: ton.~ Shipping Frequency:
15. ANTICIPATED ANNUAL VOLUME:
one time
SAMPLING INFORMATION
16a. Sample source (drum, lagoon, pond, tank, va~, etc.)
Date Sampled:
16b. Generator's Agent Supervising Sampling:
I AUTHORIZE CWM, INC. TO OBTAIN A SAMPLE AT THE ENTRy GATE.
Sampler's Name/Company:
17. [] No sample required (See Instructions.)
GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION /~ ¢ C O i~ O / /,,f~,. 7'~ I ,/t /=c"d /~ "i"r', c~ /~(1~ g.'e C,/ Ai= c'~ L Y'.~ '~
I hereby certify that alt information submitted in tl~s and all attached documents contains true and accurate descriptions of this waste. Any sample submitted is representative ~
as defined in 40 CFR 261 - Appendix I or by using an equivalent method. All relevant ,nformation regarding known or suspected hazards in the possession of the generator has :~
been,,~qi~Closed. I authorize CWM to oO~ain a sample from any waste shipment for purpo.,;es ot recertification. ~
Signature - Printed (or typed) ¢{ame and title Oate '
State of Ca~ifomia.~Health and Welfare Agency ~
Form Apprq~/ed OMB No. 2050.-0039 (Expires gl~F'l
Please' prin~ or type. For~ designed fo~ use on ei 2-pitch typewriter).
See Instructions on Back of Page 6
and Front of ' e 7
Department of Health Service
Toxic Sdl3atancea Control Divisio
SaCl'amento.. Califomi.
v . WASTE MANIFEST IAI1~101010151716181810 01010101 ] of ],Is~r~uiredbyFederal~w.
,3. Gen~at~a Name and ~ifing Addre~ ~: ~te::~:~.~'~*~/,~ ~ .~ ~: >'..,'~:
'~ '" ': "g~~, ~0~ 93301 ....... ~ ..............~,' ................ ~',~' ~' ~
' 9. Des~nat~ Facil~ Na~ a~ S~e Address 10. US EPA ID N~ ::G~:~E~~~:~[:~::.~:;~:~:~.~::~.:
~4.
12.
~ntalnem
13.
Total
11. US ~T Des~tlon (l~uding Pm~ Sh~i~ Na~, ~rd ~, m~ ID Numar)
· .N0.. T~ Q~nt~ Un~~ :-::r~W~'~
A
R c. :~t~;?:~;.,~:~h '~..::'.~ .::~ ........
~;Cy::~:~x:;t~;z~ .:.~. ~.~.:[? ~...
~:?:::,~7.:. ·
I I I I I I I .'~'~ '~"::,' ": ~:
d., State~.~v.:.~.:-
~.. ~ .=~ '::.~ ....
· .:f~. · ....:::...~.. , · . ,.¥~', ~::. :~ · . · .~. :.. ~ . .~:..:~:~.~:~ :.~.,~ ,.
....
· ' 15. Special Handli~ Inat~mi~a and Additional Info~eti~ -'
~~ ~~: ~: ~F~ ~. ~ 7949 ~ ..
~8 D~N ~ 0~ NO. 037
GENERATOR'S ~1~: I hereby d~a~e ~t ~e ¢~lents of this consion~ a~e ful~ and acoura~e~ des~b~ ~ by ~ shl~pl~ ~me
sad ar~ ~laas~i~, ~a~. ma~, sad ~1~. a~ ~e ~ all ~es~ in prier ~d~ t~ t~ans~ by h~ey eo~d~ lo appli~b~ ~te~ti~al and
nati~al 0ovemment ~Oulefions.
H I am a ~roe quant~ gene~ato~, I ¢afli~ that I have a pr~ram in Dlace to ~edu~e the ~u~ and toxic~ of waste 0e~mt~ to ~ d~ I ~ dete~ed
to be e¢onom~lly p~a~i~b~ and t~t I have se~ t~ pra~t~ble meth~ of tma~, at.age, or dispo~l ~nent~ a~b~ to ~ ~ minim~es the
p(esent ~nd f~ure threat to human heath and the en~r~ment; OR, H I am a small que~ gene~al~, I have made · g~ ~Nh efl~ lo minim~e my waste
oene~aflon and select the best waste mansoement meth~ ~t ~ ~vai~ble to me a~ ~t I ~n
: PHnted?Typed Name ~ SiOnature ~ ~ont~ Day
~--~ ~. ~,/~/~ ~a ~,~ ~ .... ~ ~1~~/
R
PHntedlTyped Name S~gn M~th Day Year
s n ~L ?~3~
~ I~./Tra~s~a~er 2'A~nowl~em~nt of ~ei~t of Materials ~ ~ ' -- ' ~ ~ - ---' -
~ PHnted/Typed Name ~'. ' ~' } Signatu~ Month Day Year
I
E
I 20. Facilffy Owner or Operator Ceoificalion of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Eem
T
, y PHnted/Typed Name { Signature Month Day Year
I
Z
DHS 8022 A
EPA 8700--22
(Rev. 6.89) Previous editions are obsolete.
Do Not Write Below This Une
· :,u~-: ':;L'~:.J'R~,[OR SENDS IHIS COPY TO DOHS
State:p.f California---Health and Welfare Agency See Instructions on Back of Page G Deparlment of He~h Services
Fo ._.~o. Pr0ved OMB No. 2050--0039 (Expires and Front of Pa '~ Tox~ Substances Control Division
~i~[ea~e pdnt or type. Form des/gnarl for use on el#e ( ~ch typewr#er). Sacramento. California
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS I~G~nerat°~'a US EPA ID N°- Manifest 2. Page II
Document No. Information in the shaded areas
WASTE MANIFEST.' IAILI01010151716!I81810 01010101:~ of! ia not req,lred by Federal law.
3. Generator's Name and Mailing Addre~
7, Tran~ 2 ~ny ~ 8. US EPA ID Nu~r
9. Dee~nat. F.~ Ne..~ S,e Address 10. US EPA ID Numbs, ~,~~~
1 I. US ~T Des~ption (Incl~i~ Proper Shipping Name. ~rd Class. and iD Numbs) 12. ~ntainem 13. Total 14.
- Quant~ Unit ,
15. 5~cial Handling instils and Additional inlo~ati~
(800)332-5376 ~ P~C~ ~O. 91~2182 "'
GENERATOR'S CE~F~A~: 1 .hereby d~are that the contents of fl~a c~sigflmeflt are ruin and accurate~ desc~ abo~ by pro~ shipping ~me
a~ are claseif~, pack~, ~, a~ ~1~. a~ are iff all respa in proper cond~i~ f~ traflspod by highway aca~i~ to
national government regulations.
H I am a large quant~ generator. I ~i~ that I have a pr~ram ~ place to r~uce the volume and toxic~ of waste gen~at~ to t~ d~r~ I ~ dete~ed
t~ be economically pregnable and that I have sel~ed the pra~i~bie meth~ of treatment, at.age, or disposal ~ffent~ avalla~ to ~ ~ minim~ea the
"..~ present and f~ure threat to human heath and the engraftment; ~. ff I am a small quant~ generator. I have made a g~ fa~h eff~ to miflim~e ~ waste
generation and sele~ the best waste management meth~ that is avei~ble to me and that I ~n aff~d.
17. Transpolar 1 A~nowledgement of R~eipt of Materials
18. Transpolar 2 ~ckno~ledgement of Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name I Signature ' M~ Day Year
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
20. Facility Owner or Operator ~ification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Eem 19. '
Printed/Typed Name J Signature Month Day Year
DHS 8022 A
EPA 8700---22
(Rev. 6-89) Previous editions ere obsolete.
Do Not Write Below This Line
~i,~e: G£NEI~AI02 S[N~,fi THIS COPY TO F.'OHS 'h'ITHiN 39
State,of. California--Health and Warfare Agency eeo Instructions on Back of Page 6 Department of H~lth Sewicea
.For~, :~pproved OMB No. 2050--4X)39 (Expires and Front of Pa ? Toxic Substances ~1 Division
or type. Form cles/gned fo~ use on elite, :~ch typewrfter). Sacramento, Califoml&
WASTE MANIFEST CI AI LI 01 01 01 51 71 61 81 81 0 01 0! 01 01~ pt ! .~. =,..u~.~ by F~..I.w.
11: US ~T Desc~.tlo. Oncluding Prop. Sh.~ Ns.. ~. CIa., and ID Number)' Oua.~ Una
(800)332~5376 ~S P[~C~ ~0, 9192182
GENERATOR'S CE~F~: I hereby declare that the ~tents of this consignment are fulN and accurately deacHb~ a~ by pr~ ~ipp~ ~me
and are clasa~ied, pack~, ma~, and labeled, a~ are ~ all reap~s in proper coati,ion for traaspo~ by highway acceding to appli~ble ~e~t~al and
national government regulations.
If I am a large quant~ generator. I ce~i~ that I have a pr~ram ia place to reduce the volume and toxici~ of waste generat~ to t~ ~ree I ~ dete~
to be economi~lly pra~ble and that I have sel~ t~ pra~icable method of treatment, Storage, or dispo~l ~ffentN av~b~ to me ~ mind.es the
present and fmure threat to human heath and the en~r~ment; ~. ~ I am a small quant~ generate. I have made a g~ fa~h eff~ to minim~e ~ ~aste
generation and sele~ the best waste management meth~ t~t la avai~bl,e to me and ~at I ~a afford.
17. Transpolar 1 Acknowl~gement of Receipt of Mate~ls
]8. Tran~po~er 2 Acknowiedgemeat ot Receipi of
'~dniedlTyped N~me [ Signature Month Day Year
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
20. Facility ~ner or Operator Ce~ification gl receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Eem 19.
Printed./Typed Name ~ 8igg~ture M~th Day
DHS 8022 A
EPA 8700--22
CRev. 6-8g} Previous editions are obsolete.
Do Not Write Below This Line
, C':?,;:!M,;OP... SEND5 ':'h'¢. ,.. COPY Ti) DOHS WITHIN 30 DAYS
:;S.tart
4 ,,~ we,are Agency i See Instructions on of Page 6 Oepa,me.t o~ ,ea~.Services
OMB No. 2050--0039 (Expires 9.3~11~ and Froltt of. ~' ~ 7 Toxic Substances Co~t0! Divistcm
'Form designed for uae on eli. :-pitch typewriter). " Sacrame.t0[Califomia
. ... - WASTE MANIFEST C} ~'11',} 0] 0] 01 51 71 61 81 81 0 0];~ of ]. ia not required by F~
~. 6. Tran~ 1 ~pany Name 6. US EPA ID Number :C,::~e :T~~
A' ' - ' '"': ' ....... '
R c. ..... '-.. ', :~?~'~.~? :~ ~::' ~
, '"'t I I IIII '~,~"'*'~ · ~': ..... ·
I
15. Special Handling Inat~iona and Addit~l Inf~at~
~S DeA~N ~ Cl~ NO. 037
(800)332-5376 ~S PR~ECT N0. 91E2182
, ~6.
~ GENE~TO~'S CE~F~: I h~oby ~aro t~t t~ ~tents o[ this cons~nme~ are ful~ and accurate~ descNbed a~ve by pr~ ah~p~ nam~
and are c~aaffi~, pack~, ma~. and ~1~. and are ~ all re~ ~ ~ c~dH~ f~ transpo~ by highway acceding to appli~ble ~tematl~al and
~t~al gov~me~ r~u~tl~a.
H I am a ~roe quant~ generate, I ~ ~at I have a ~ram in place to r~uce tho volume and toxici~ of waste generat~ to ~ g~r~ I ~ datelined
present and f~ure t~eat to human heath a~ ~e en~r~ment; ~, H I am a small quanti~ generate, I have made a g~ faflh effo~ to m~im~e ~ waste
gsneration and aele~ the best waste managem~t met~ t~t la avaihible to ~ a~ that I ~n afl~d.
Pdnte~/Typed N,me t Signature ~~ M.th Day Year
M~th
0 18. fra.spoder 2 Ack.owledgement of R~¢ of ~dala
~ Pdnte~/Typed Name ' ] Signature Moth Day Year
E
19. Oiacrepan~ Indication Space
F
A
C
I
L
20. Facility ~er or Operator ~ification of receipt of hazardous materials cover~ by this manifest except as noted in Hem 19.
y Printed/Typed Name J ~;ignature M~th Day Year
DHS 8022 A
EPA 6700-22
[Rev. 6-89) Previous editions are obsolete.
Do Not Write Below This Line
3.~.:: (kNF. k,',.iCP. S~NDS THIS COPY 10 DOHS
TL 988-099-07
A-1
Appendix A
Copies of laboratory results and chain-of-custody
documentation
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
. I II IIII - ! . I ._ ' I --" ' ....
GeotechniCaland EnvironmentaiConsultants · Engineeringand ChemicalLab°ratories
REPORT DATE : March 29, 1991
EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1525.1-7
CLIENT
: Isaacs & Bailey
2702 'F' Street
Bakersfield, CA
: Valley Oldsmobile
2300 'H' Street
Bakersfield, CA
PROJECT NAME
DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-9.1 by B. B1Fthe
DATE RECEIVED: 03-26-91 at 1513 hrs. from B. Blythe
PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe
The Twlning Laboratories is accredited by the State of
California Department of Health Services for the analysis of
Drinking Water and Hazardous Waste under Certificate No. 1371
In accordance with your instructions, the samples submitted
were analyzed for the components specified. All samples analyzed
were submitted in good condition. The analytical results are
enclosed on the following pages.
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning the.
analyses or'results. Thank you for letting us serve you.
JLS:mls
lc:herewith
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
Jori L. St:rutzel
Inorganic 8upervS~or, Chemistry Divi~:i.~n
["t 2,527 Fresno Street - P,O. Box 1472
I=reano. Call.fOrma 93716 · (209) 268-7021
. I[ . HIll
9401 West Goshen Avenue
VIsafla, California 93291 · (209)851.2190
140.5 Granite Lane. Suite
REPORT .DATE : March 29, 1991
EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1525.1-?
CLIENT
: Isaacs & Bailey
PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmob:[le
PROJECT MGR: B. Bl.ythe
PAGE I of 2
DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 by B. Blythe
DATE RECEIVED: 03-26-91 at 1513 hrs. from B. Blythe
DATE PREPARED: 03-26-91
DATE ANALYZED: 03-27-91
ANALYZED BY
REVIEWED BY
SAMPLE TYPE
CONSTITUENT
: M. Peterson
: O. 'Koelewyn
Soil
Oil & Grease
METHOD: .413.2
EXAM' NO.
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
RESULT
(mg/kg)
691-1525.1 5-19 Piping Trench 55
3.0' BSG 18' E/SW
Bldg Corn.
5-20 Piping Trench
3.5' BSG 17' W/NE
Bldg Corn.
5-21 11.§' BSG Bottom
of Excavation
691-1525.4 5-22 8.5' BeG N/Sidewall 45
691-1525.5 5-23 8.5' BSG W/Sidewall 45
691-1525.6 5-24 8.5' BSG E/Sidewall 105
691-1525.7 5-25 8.5' BSG S/Sidewall' 50
MDL
(mgtkg)
691-1525.2 50 5
691-1525.3 35 5
5
5
5
5
NOTES:
mg/kg: milligrams Der kilogram (Darts Der million)
MDL : Method Detection Limi~
F~'esno Modemo V~i8 , B41k~rellek:l
REP.ORT DATE : March 39, 1991
EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1525.1-7
CLIENT
: Isaacs & Bailey
PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe
PAGE 2 of 2
PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmobile
DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 by B. Blythe
DATE RECEIVED: 03-26-9'1 at 1513 hrs. from B. Blythe
DATE PREPARED: 03-27-91
DATE ANALYZED: I
ANALYZED BY
REVIEWED BY
: D. Lehman
: J. Strutzel
SAMPLE TYPE
CONSTITUENT
: Soil
: Lead. (Pb)
METHOD: 7421
. S~uMP LE
EXAM NO. IDENTIFICATION RESULT MOL
.(rog/kg) (rog/kg)
691-1525.i 5-19 Piping Trench 3.8 0.5
3.0' BSG 18' E/SW
Bldg. Corn.
691-1525.2. 5-20 Piping Trenclh 5.2 0.5
3.5' BSG 17' W/NE
Bldg Corn.
691-1525,3 5-21 11.5' BSG Bottom 1.9 0.5
of Excavation
691-1525.4 5-22 8.5' BSG N/S:idewall 13 0.5
691-1525.5 5-23 8.5' BSG W/Sidewall 5.8 0.5
691-1525.6 5-24 8.5' BSG E/S:[dewall 120 0,5
691-1525.7 5-25 8.5' BSG S/Sidewall 4.5 0.5
/. /
NOTES:
mg/kg: milligrams Der kilogram (parts Der million)
MhL : Method Detection Limit
Date J~ ,- .~.5"-. '~/'
Page ,/ of i
Report To:
Client Name ..~"..l",~'~,~,~_._y'
Address
Contact Name
Phon~
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
2527 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721
(209) 268-7021
Chain-of-Custody and Analysis Request Record
Copies To:
Expected Turnaround:
y Rush [] Routine
Contract/PO# Specify Time -~' '"..2~' -~'/ ./,2
~mpler Name ~'.
Project Name
Address
AnalySis Requested
TL# ~
Lab
Due
Date
........ _
l ab~ Client Sample Sample
ID# Sample ID ' Date/Time Type #/Size/Type of Container Preservation/Handling:
~ach ha~ardou, ,amplo ~ubmittod For Wator ~am~les. ploase Gomments: {Bilk 10 IF OlHfi~) ~ept. Initials Dato/lime kocation
for analyslswlll bo charged a hazard- check one of the following: 601
ous waste disposal fee. Clients that D Drinking Water
retrieve hazardous samples within 30 D Waste Water 602
days of the analytical report date will ~ Ground Water (wells) 603
be refunded any disposal fees. ~ Surface Water (rivers. lakes) 604
Relinquished~ ~ _ Delivered By: Received By: Received By:
Signatur~ ~ ~ ~ Signature Signature Signature
Pri~~/~ ~ ~~ Printed Company Company
Company ~/~ ' Company Date~ime Date/Time
Date/Time ~ -J~ ~/ ~ Date~ime Log In Date~ime Log In Date/Time
Geotechnicaland Environmental Consultants · Engineering and Chemical Laboratories
REPORT DATE : April 15, 1991 PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe
EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1784.1-2
CLIENT : Isaacs & Bailey
2702 'F' Street
Bakersfield, CA
PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmobile
2300 'H' Street
Bakersfield, CA
DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 by B. Blythe
DATE RECEIVED: 04-08-91 at 0848 hrs. from B. Blythe
The Twining Laboratories is accredited by the State of
California Department of Health Services for the analysis of
Drinking Water and Hazardous Waste under Certificate No. 1371.
In accordance with your instructions, the samples submitted
were analyzed for the components specified. All samples analyzed
were submitted in good condition. The analytical results are
enclosed on the following pages.
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning the
analyses or results. Thank you fc, r letting us serve you.
JLS:mls
lc:herewith
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC~.
,~Jon L. Strutzel
Inorganic Supervisor, Chemistry Division
2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472
Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021
9401 West Goshen Avenue
Visalia, California 93291 · (209)651-2190
REPORT DATE : ADril 15, 1991
EXAMINATION NO.: 691-1784.1-2
CLIENT
: Isaacs & Bailey
PROJECT NAME : Valley Oldsmobile
PROJECT MGR: B. Blythe
PAGE 1 of 1
DATE SAMPLED : 03-25-91 at See Below hrs. by B. Blythe
DATE RECEIVED: 04-08-91 at 0848 hrs. from B. Blythe
DATE PREPARED: 04-06-91
DATE ANALYZED: 04-15-91
ANALYZED BY
REVIEWED BY'
SAMPLE TYPE
CONSTITUENT
: J. Strutzel, T. Geringer
: J. Strutzel
: Soil
: Lead (Pb)
METHOD: 7420
SAMPLE
EXAM NO. IDENTIFICATION RESULT
(mg/L)
MDb
(mg/L)
691-1784.1 S-24 8.5' BSG 1.1
East Sidewall/1515
691-1784.2 S-22 8.5' BSG ND
North Sidewall/1504
0.4
0.4
NOTES:
mg/L: milligrams per Liter (parts per million)
MDL : Method Detection Limit
ND : None Detected
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfielcl
I I'
Date ' '
Page" of .....
Reporl To:" .'~ '-':'-.. -..'.:';':.'..,,~:.:~L":'.?.;'::....:iC'' ..":.' ! cOPies To: ' -" ': :
Client'Name": ~ "-~'~'('~- ()~. '::~'~t_~:~:b':~l:':"..: ': :." .'. :.,.. . ': ~ ' ':"" "
oontrac~po~·: ' · Specify Time · · '
Sampler Name
.
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
... - 2527 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721 (209) 268-7021
. Cha!mof-Custody and Analysis Request Record
Project Name ~J~'C~-\ O~-J~b\~-
· ~. '~rt,~d~~u_~, QI~.
Analysis Requested /
' M//////
'~.~ID~: Client' Sam'pie '' Sample / /
'. ,; · . . Sample ID · ' Date/Time Type #/Size/Type of Container
~~~;-¢.~ .... ~,...~,, , .~....:.:....,,.-...,..:.::-:,., ....., '...;~>~,~.:.. '...'.~..?
. '~ ,' , ..~ ,~. ~ - ~ : ,
: ~~~.?,.:. ~.~.~..~,.~.,,~,~:,........ '~.~:::.".~ ..:;.:-:.::f;.... :.,'., .. :>..::-:'~.: ':...':~
. .
,~.~ ...... ~,....~ :~,,~..~>..,~..~ . ~, ,., ~.'..... . . ~,:_ ..
;~:. ~' ~,~"~'~'.'.': ~;.¢':". ~4,',;'" ,~ ''.: ~' ~,.. ,"',, "
' :~ :., ,, .' .t'~.~ ~:~,~ ~:;,,,, :..~,.~ ~,: - ,:.2,. ~. :' ~,.: :.., ' :,,........ ,..' ':,'.
· ~ ~,~.~'~.~>:.;~'N: ~,::.,-:,:,.,;?~¢'?- ' '" "'
. ?i ·
:~-~.i
: '~?.1 ·-""<' ...... : ..... ::
~" · '.- · ' "' 'i~~~~~',, t~J"' ~: '..' ..'.--. "-'.:.: '..'.'..'~ '...:'~':::t'::.::.:~ ....
' '
'Each h~zardn., samni, ,.~m", For Water samples p eaSe Comments' a LLTO~OT~_/~ . 'DeP'~::,?:~lta~%':' .t.. oam~ime -.... · · . ':;-,' Loca on' "?':'::::'.'"
:. _ . ................ , .... . . ( ~ ?...., .~.:~,~....~..,.... ~ ...:....... .............. ...:.,.. . .:........: ..... ~.... ..... ,.,. :,. .... .
ous waste disposal fee Clients that O Dr nking Water - ' '
· . . . ·
days of the analytical report date will . O Ground Water (wel S)
be refunded any d sposa fees
· ~ Surface Water (rivers, lakes) ~~-~'~
; . ' - ~ ' ~.t~'-..;..~ ,- .... : "". · ·
ZALCO LABOI~IATOI~III~S, lNG.
Analytical ~, Consulting Services
Twining Lab
3701 Pegasus Drive
Bakersfield, CA. 93308
Attention: Bruce Blythe
Laboratory No: 27127
Date Received: 4-11-91
Date Reported: 4-12-91
Job No: 988-090-03
Sample: Soil
Sample Description:
Valley Olds 2300 H Street
See Below
Sampled by Bruce Blythe on 4-10-91 at 1730 hours
Lab No.
27127
Description
S-26 Background
Oil and Grease
Sonicator/413.2, mq/1
130
Minimum Reporting Level
5O
RLP/tla
4309 Armour Avenue
F RO.~l 395-0539
Richard L. Penner
Laboratory Director
Ba~l~ersfielct, California 93308
FAX [8051 395-3069
i '1
Date ./'~-./.; - .~....
Page / / of ,X
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
2527 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721.
(209) 268-7021
Chain-of-Custody and Analysis Request Record
Copies To:
Expected Turnaround:
/Rush [] Routine
Specify Time
Project Name
Address - ~
Analysis Requested
Report To:
Client Name., ...--
Address
J ='
Contact Name
Phone
Contract/PO~
_ ,, / - /// //-. .
Lab Client sample Sample / / / / / ' Preservation/Handling:
~ ID# Sample ID Date/Time Type #/Size/Type of Container
,,/
'iI.: . : ..., . .'.
, , ....!, . · ..,., · ... ?.. , ,
..,Each ~' For Water samples, please Comments: (BILL TO IF OTHER) Dept. Initials Date/rime · Location
hazardous sample submitted · ·
for analysis will be charged a hazard- check one of the following: 601
ous waste disposal fee. Clients that E) Drinking Water :
retrieve hazardous samples within 30 t-I Waste Water 602·
days of the analytical report date will [3 Ground Water (wells) 603 . · ..... ·
be refunded any disposal fees. [3 Surface Water (rivers, lakes) 604
Relinquished By~.~ Delivered By: Received By:, . .'.. ...' .; Received By:
~ ~ . ~ /. : ,-.'~,..
Signature~.~ .--~....;.- ..." '~': ': :'"'"- -.--, Signature S~gnature '""' / ~":" "' { (¥1""'/~ t ~..~_, :. Signature
Printed, ,. ...... ..- Printed Company' ' i! ! ~. (i ! /~t~: -' Company
Company ~ Company Date/Time 1,' // ,~') / 'J. J? ~ ') Date/Time
Date/Time .., .- __ ,- . -; : Date/Time Log In Date/Time ./~/',)}~ Log In Date/Time
Geotechnicaland Environmental Consultants · Engineering and Chemical Laboratories
REMEDIAL ACTMT~
V~LLRY OLDS~)BILE FACILIT~
2300 'H' STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For:
Isaacs and Bailey
2707 "F" Street
Bakersfield, California
April 30, 1991
93301
2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472
Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021
1405 Granite Lane, Suite 1
Modesto, California 95351 · (209) 523-0994
9401 West Goshen Avenue
Visalia, California 93291 · (209)651-2190
3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 124
Bakersfield, California 93308 · (805) 393-5088
TL 988-099-07
TABT~ OF CONTENTS
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
INTRODUCTION ....................................
SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ACTIVITY ...................
EVALUALTION .....................................
CONCLUSION ......................................
RECOMMENDATION ..................................
CLOSING .........................................
PAGE
1
2
7
9
9
10
LIST OF TABLF. S
Table No. 1
- Analytical Results of Confirmation
Soil Sample Analyses, Oil and Grease and
Total Lead
Table No. 2 - Analytical Results of Confirmation
Soil Sample Analyses, Soluble Lead
Table No.' 3
- Analytical Results of Soil Sample Analysis,
Oil and Grease
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A - Results of laboratory analyses and
chain-of-custody documentation
Appendix B - Waste profile documentation and hazardous
waste manifests
Appendix C - Copy of in-place density test results for
backfill
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants · Engineering and Chemical Laboratories
REMEDIAL ACTMT~
V~T,T.WY OLDSMO~IT.R FACIT.IT~
2300 "H" STREET
~RSFIF~, C~IFORNI. A
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the remedial activities which were
conducted to mitigate the oil and grease contaminated soils
resulting from a former waste motor oil tank (UST) at the Valley
Oldsmobile facility in Bakersfield, California. This work was
authorized by Mr. Cecil Bailey of Isaacs and Bailey and conducted bY
the Environmental Engineering Division of The Twining Laboratories,
Inc. (Twining).
The contents of this report include a summary of the remedial
activities, the analytical results of the soil sample analyses of
the cleanup confirmation samples, conclusions regarding site
cleanup, and recommendations for site closure. The three report
appendices contain copies of the laboratory analyses and the chain-
of-custody documentation (Appendix A), the waste profile
documentation and the hazardous waste manifests (Appendix B), and
the in-place density test results for the backfill (Appendix C).
[] 2527 Fresno Street · P.O. Box 1472
Fresno, California 93716 · (209) 268-7021
[] 9401 West Goshen Avenue
Visalia, California 93291 · (209)651-2190
1405 Granite Lane, Suite I ~ 3701 Pegasus Drive, Suite 124
TL 988-099-07
Page 2
2.0 SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ACTIVITIE:S
On March 25, 1991, approximately 56 tons of soil containing oil
and grease and lead were excavated from the location of the former
UST and the UST piping trench at. the project site. The remedial
work was performed by Kern Environmental Services in accordance with
the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) dated March 19, 1991. After it was
determined by visual methods that the affected soils had been
removed, cleanup confirmation soil samples were obtained by Twining
at the direction of Hr. Joe Canas of the Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department (KCEHSD). The soil samples were obtained
from the bottom of the excavation and from each sidewall of the
excavation. In addition, two soil samples were obtained from the
former UST piping trench. The confirmation soil samples were
analyzed by Twining for Oil and Grease and Lead. The analytical
results of the soil sample analyses are presented in Table No. 1.
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL.988-099-07
Page 3
TABLE NO. 1
Analytical Results of Confi]~ation Soil Sample Analyses
Oil and Grease and Total Lead
Date Sampled: March 25, 1991
Soil Sample
Sample Location
Number and Depth
0il and Grease,
mg/kg
Total Lead,
mq/kg
S-19 Piping Trench, 55
18 feet East from
Southwest Building
Corner, 3.0 feet BSG
3.8
S-20 Piping Trench 50
17 feet West from
Northeast Building
Corner, 3.5 feet BSG
5.2
S-21 Bottom of Excavation 35
11.5 feet BSG
1.9
S-22 North Sidewall 45
8.5 feet BSG
13.0
S-23 West Sidewall 45
8.5 feet BSG
5.8
S-24 East Sidewall '105
8.5 feet BSG
120.0
S-25 South Sidewall 50
8.5 feet BSG
4.5
MDL - 5
Abbreviations:
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MDL = Method Detection Limit
BSG = Below Site Grade
0.5
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07
Page 4
The analytical results of the confirmation soil sample analyses
were transmitted to the KCEHSD on April 1, 1991. The KCEHSD
concluded that the potential existed for soil samples S-22 and S-24
to contain concentrations of soluble lead in excess of the
regulatory limit of 5.0 milligr~ns per liter (mg/1) set forth in
Title 22, Article 11, Section 666199, California Code of Regulations
(Title 22 CCR). The KCEHSD requested that the soluble lead
concentration be determined for these samples by the Waste
Extraction Test (WET) method described in Title 22 CCR. A WET was
performed on the samples by ~¢ining on April 3, 1991. The
analytical results of the soil sample analyses are presented in
Table No. 2.
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07 Page 5
TABLE NO. 2
Analytical Results of Confi]~ation Soil Sample Analyses
Soluble Lead
Date Sampled: March 25, 1991
Soil
Sample Sample Soluble Lead,
Number Location and Depth mq/1
S-22 North Sidewall ND
8.5 feet BSG
S-24 East Sidewall 1.1
8.5 feet BSG
MDL - 0.4
Abbreviations:
mg/1 = milligrams per liter (parts per million)
MDL = Method Detection Limit
BSG = Below Site Grade
ND = Nondetected
To verify that the cleanup level of 50 mg/kg for oil and
grease proposed in the RAP was within the limits of the range of
the background concentration of oil and grease typical.for the on-
site soils, a background soil sample was obtained by Twining on
April 10, 1991. The soil sample was obtained from the on-site soils
at a location approximately 100 feet northwest from the former UST
location at a depth of approximately 3 feet BSG. The soil sample
was analyzed for oil and grease constituents by Zalco Laboratories
Fresno Modesto Visatia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07 Page 6
in Bakersfield, California on April 11, 1991. The analytical result
of the-soil sample analysis is presented in Table No. 3.
TABLE NO. 3
Analytical Result of Soil Sample Analysis
Oil and Grease
Date Sampled: April 10, 1991
Soil
Sample
Number
S-26
Sample
Location and Depth
100 feet Northwest
from Former UST
3.0 feet BSG
Oil and Grease,
mq/kq
130
50
Abbreviations:
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million)
MRL = Minimum Reporting Level
BSG = Below Site Grade
On March 26, 1991, the excavated soil was manifested and
transported as hazardous waste by Kern Environmental ,Services to
the Class I Waste Management Unit operated by Chemical Waste
Management, Inc. located near Kettleman City, California. Prior to
accepting the soil for disposal, the soil was profiled by Chemical
Waste Management under Waste Profile Number AL 7949.
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
_ TL 988-099-07 Page 7
After the confirmation soil samples were obtained from the
excavation, the excavation was backfilled with imported fill
material. The excavation was closed at the request of the city of
Bakersfield Department of Public ~rks and the KCEHSD because of the
close proximity of the excavation to the alley located east of the
excavation. The fill was compacted to a minimum of 90 per cent of
the -maximum density of the fill material. The backfilling
operation was monitored by Twining personnel and in-place density
tests were taken during the fill placement in accordance with ASTM
Method D-2922.
3.0 EVALUATION
The analytical results of the soil samples analyses indicate
that the oil and grease concentrations detected in the confirmation
samples are within the range of the proposed cleanup level of 50
mg/kg recommended in the RAP with. the exception of soil sample S-24
(east sidewall location). However, the detected level of 105 mg/kg
in soil sample S-24 falls within the background range of, 10 mg/kg to
130 mg/kg which was established for the on-site soils by laboratory
analyses during the remedial and subsequent phases of the
investigation.
The analytical results of the soil sample analyses for the
samples obtained by B.C. Laboratories at the time of the UST removal
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07
Page 8
in February 1988 indicated that the soils beneath the piping
contained a concentration of 1,428 mg/kg oil and grease at a depth
of six feet below the piping. However, when excavating the
contaminated soil from beneath the former piping during the remedial
work, visual observations by Twining personnel and the results of
the confirmation sample analyses indicated that the extent of the
contamination beneath the piping did not exceed a depth of three
feet BSG. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may be that
the soil sample obtained .by B.C. Labs could have been taken at a
location within the westward lateral extent of the soil
contamination resulting from the leaking UST and not beneath the
piping. Furthermore, the piping was not removed at the time that
the UST was removed in February 1988 but was removed by Kern
Environmental Services during the remedial work, thus, it would
appear unlikely that B.C. Labs could have obtained a soil sample at
a depth of six feet beneath the piping. During the remedial work,
the soil in the vicinity of the former UST was excavated to a depth
of approximately 11.5 feet BSG for a distance extending in the
direction of the piping for approximately eight feet, thus, it. may
be concluded that if any contaminated soil did exist at a depth of
six feet beneath the piping, it existed within the lateral extent
of the contamination resulting from the former UST and that it was
removed as part of the remedial work.
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07 Page 9
The analytical results of the soil sample analyses for total
lead and soluble lead for all of the confirmation soil samples are
below the TTLC of 1,000 mg/kg and. the STLC of 5.0 mg/1 set forth in
Title 22 CCR.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the field observations and the analytical results of
the confirmation soil sample analyses, the contaminated soils
resulting from the former UST have been removed and disposed of in
accordance with state and federal regulations.
5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS
A copy of this report should be forwarded to the KCEHSD for their
review and comments.
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield
TL 988-099-07
Page 10
6.0 CLOSING
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Isaacs and
Bailey on this project. Should you have any questions concerning
this report, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
THE TWINING LABORATORIES, INC.
Bruce M. Blythe, REA No. 02472
Project Geologist/Bakersfield Office
lc: herewith
KCEHSD: Mr. Canas
B
Fresno Modesto Visalia Bakersfield