HomeMy WebLinkAboutUST REP 05/27/92CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
HAZARDOUS
MATERI'ALS
DIVI S ION
PROJECT
FIRE DEPARTMENT T I ME
S. D. JOHNSON
FIRE CHIEF //~ '--.-. ~ '
CHARGED
2101 H STREET
BAKERSFIELD, 93301
326-3911
TIME
DATE: NAME: CHGD:
COMMENTS:
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
/ BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
Date PERMIT Permit No.
'In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances,., codes and/or, regulations, permission is hereby
granted to: C'L~ ~ ~-~2/~/~)
~Name o('Company / . / ,-~-~r= ' Address
to display, store, r install, use, 'operate, sell or handle materials or process invo!vJng or creating con-
ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows:
subject to the provisions and/or limitations os provided on the reverse hereof. Violation of pertin-
ent ordinances, codes and/or regulations shall void this permit.
Fire Marshal
'KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION ~:ONTROL DISTRICT
2700 "M" Street, Suite 275
. Bakersfield, CA. 93301
(805) 861-3682
PHASE I VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM
Station Name ~/~r., /.~),~T':¢~ _~.~,'_~ Location ~ '~,~ ~;), /""~
PlO cf
Company Mailing Address
1.. PRODUCT'(UL, PUL, P, or R).
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
TANK LOCATION REFERENCE ~/
BROKEN OR MISSING VAPOR CAP
BROKEN OR MISSING FILL CAP
BROKEN CAM LOCK ON VAPOR CAP
FILL CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED
VAPOR CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED
GASKET MISSING FROM FILL CAP
GASKET MISSING FROM VAPOR CAP
FILL ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT
VAPOR ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT
GASKET BETWEEN ADAPTOR & FILL
TUBE MISSING / IMPROPERLY SEATED
DRY BREAK GASKETS DETERIORATED
EXCESSIVE VERTICAL PLAY IN .
COAXIAL FILL TUBE
'COAXIAL FILL TUBE SPRING
MECHANISM DEFECTIVE
TANK DEPTH MEASUREMENT
TUBE LENGTH MEASUREMENT
e: Se ~R~~oaxial. . ' .
Rec'd By 'f '~'"'/~~_ __
Notice
TANK #1 TANK #2 · TANK ~3 ' :,TANK ~4 ::.".::. :':.~...' .
'
18. DIFFERENCE (SHOULD BE 6" OR LESS)
19. OTHER
20. COMMENTS: ·
WARNING: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A CHECK ABOVE ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
DISTRICT RULE(S) 209, 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES
OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805).861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLU-
:"'..i~]~NVlRONMENTAL,.HEALTH SERVICES SEPARTMENT
2700 "M."'STREET, SUITE 300, BAKERSFIELD, CA.93301 "
(805)861-3636
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE FACILITY
* INSPECTION REPORT ~
'TYPE OF INSPECTION:
TIME IN J2.,'/.~... TIME.,..45UT NUMBER OF TANKS:· 1
YES. .: ....... '~'~ ......~.. ' ....................~"~4SPECTICN DAT;:L.E~/,~,,_~,.',Z:~:.~. ........
..... ~'~'~J7 'I N E_¢,,.~.]]][ "~-E I N S P E C TI ON ....................... CON
FAC I L'~"{'~'--~'~'f~'"~":-~-~'E'~"~'~'~'~"~--'~-~:FER SERV
FAC I L I TY A D D R ESS: .~.~_.2_.~5...:...S.,,0.
: BAKERSFIELD, CA
· OWNERS NAME=
OPERATORS NAM'E:CALI'FORNIA WATER SERVICE
COMMENTS:
ITEM .... : .... . VIOLAT!ONS/OBSERVATIONS"C
~/.Standard inven~ky Contro] I
c. Modified Inventory Control
d. in-tank L~vel Sensing Device
e. Groundwater Monitoring
f. Vadose Zone Monitoring
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MONITORING:
,, Un,r
b. Doub]e-lNa]~ed tank '¢ ....
c. Vault '"
PIPING MONITORING:
a. Pressurized
Suction
c. Gravity
OVERFILL PROTECTION=
TIGHTNESS TESiNG i
~ T
NEW ,~ONSTRUCTION/MODIF,CATIONS
CLOSURE/AGANOONMENT
UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE
MAINTENANCE, GENERAL SAFETY, AND
OPERATING CONDITION OF FACILITY
KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
2700 "M" Street, Suite 275
Bakersfield, CA. 93301
(805) 861-3682
PHASE I VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM
COmpany Mailing Address _~'~., ,,"','7,~
Date· ~"!.,..~"~//~ / Phone
...... Inspector : ' -t~ ), ~_)~ ~ ~
P/O #
.,....1 ..... pRODUCT(UL PUL P, or R). .
': - - : 2:. TANK LOCATION REFERENCE '~,-,
3. BROKEN OR MISSING VApoR CAP
4. BROKEN OR MISSING FILL CAP
5. BROKEN CAM LOCK ON VAPOR CAP
6. FILL CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED
7. VAPOR CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED
8. GASKET MISSING FROM FILL CAP
9. GASKET MISSING FROM VAPOR CAP
~ 10. FILL ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT
e: Se R~t~oaxial ..... .'_ ,
Notice R~c'd By'/'~/~~' ~ ......
~ ~"- ! -7",2 - ~ ,
,. - TANK # 1 TANK #2
. p_. L
1 1. VAPOR ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT
12. GASKET BETVVEEN ADAPTOR & FILL
TUBE MISSING / IMPROPERLY SEATED
13. DRY BREAK GASKETS DETERIORATED
14. EXCESSIVE VERTICAL PLAY .IN
COAXIAL FILL TUBE
15. COAXIAL FILL TUBE SPRING
MECHANISM DEFECTIVE
· 16. TANK DEPTH MEASUREMENT
17. TUBE LENGTH MEASUREMENT
18. DIFFERENCE (SHOULD BE 6" OR LESS)
19. OTHER
20. COMMENTS:
WARNING: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A CHECK ABOVE ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
DISTRICT RULE(S) 209, 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES
OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION· TELEPHONE (805) 861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLU-
~-~ TION OF THE VIOLATION(S)
KERN COUNTY AIR P~)LLUTION CONTRO~IS~ICT
2700 "M" stre(~t, Suite ~275
· ' Bakersfield, CA. 93301
(805) B61-3682
PHASE II VAPOR RECOVERY INSPECTION FORM
Station Location ~ ?~ ) ~' ~'~'% /-/ .~-T"-~' P/O ·
Company Address_~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ' Gity ~-~,. ~-- r~/~. ~ ~D~ ~~_.. /
Contact Phone ~ --, System Type: ~ ~ GH HA
Inspector~ '~, ,k ..... ~;~f~ Date ~/~/~/ Notice Rec'd By..... '=~(~7 ~~~-- ----_ : .
NOZZLE ~. --~-'"
'-:~' ' .... GAS GRADE
.... -. NOZZLE T~FE.
[./L ?- ,.
i. CERT. N0771 E '
..... w<LV ..........
2. CHECK' " '- ?..- -~:
0 3. FACE SEAL " :'
Z
Z 4. RING, RIVET
L
E 5. BELLOWS
6. SWIVEL(S)
- 7. 'FLOW LIMITER (EW)
' : i. HOSE CONDITION ·
A 2. LENGTH ·
P
0 3. (~)NFIGURATION I-' '-
R
'4. SWIVEL
H
0 5. OVERHEAD RETRACTOR
E 6. POWER/PILOT ON
7. SIGNS POSTED
Key to system types: Key to deficiencies: NC~ not certified, B= broken
BA=Balance HE =Healey M~ missing, TO= torn, F= flat, TN= tangled
RJ =Red Jacket GH=Gulf Hasselmann AD= needs adjustment, L= long, LO= loose,
HI =Hirt HA =Hasstech S= short MA= misaligned, K= kinked, FR= frayed.
INSPECTION RESULTS
COMMENTS:
Key to inspection results: Blank= OK, 7= Repair within seven
days, T= Tagged (nozzle tagged out-of-order until repaired)
U= Taggable violation but left in use.
VIOLATIONS: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A "T OR U" CODE IN INSPECTION RESULTS,ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE(S) 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE
SPECIFIES PENALTIES OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH DAY OF VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805) 861-3682
CONCERNING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE VIOLATION.
NOTE:· CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 41960..2~ REQUIRES THAT THE ABOVE LISTED 7-DAY DEFICIENCIES
BE CORRECTED WITHIN 7 DAYS. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION
ol-~.:--' '~ APCD F!LE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (805) 326-3979
APPLICATION TO INSTALL AND/OR REMOVE
ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK(S)
In conformity with provisions of pertinem ordinances, codes and/or regulations, permission is
hereby grained to:
Name of Company Address
to display, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or process involving or creating
conditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows:
subject to the provisions and/or limitations as provided. Violation of pertinent ordinances, codes
and/or regulations shall void this permit.
Date
"~ ~.~.~~y: Applicant Name (print)
Applicant Signature
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
Dote APPLICATION
in conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, opplication is made'
Name of Company Address
to diSPlay, store, install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or processes involving or creating con-
ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows:
Au~,horize~ F~eprese~ive
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMEI~
,~/~_./~// BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
Date PERMIT Permit No,
In conformity with provisions of pertinent ordinances, codes and/or regulations, permission is hereby
granted to:
N~me of (:ompany ~' Address
to display, store, r install, use, operate, sell or handle materials or process involving or creating con-
ditions deemed hazardous to life or property as follows:
subject to the provisions and/or limitations as provided on the-reverse hereof. Violation of pertin-
ent ordinances, codes and/or regulations shall void this permit.
Fire Marshal
FiRE DEPARTMENT
S. D, JOHNSON
FIRE CHIEF
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
May 27, 1992
2101H STREET
BAKERSFIELD 93301
326-3911
California Water Service Company
3725 South H Street
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Attn: Ed Wegemer
Dear Mr. Wegemer,.
This is to inform you that this department has reviewed the results
for the site investigation of the unauthOrized release associated
with the closure of the tank located at 3725 South H Street,. in
Bakersfield California.
Based upon laboratory data submitted and with the provisions that
the information provided to this agency was accurate and
representative of existing conditions it is the position of this
office that no further action is required at'this time.
Be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability
under the California Health and'Safety Code, or any other Federal,
State, County, and/or City law and/or ordinance .for past, present,
or future operations. Nor does'it relieve the property owner of the
responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously
unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to
cause pollution or nuisance or Otherwise pose a threat to water
quality or public health.
In addition, -any future changes in site use may require further
assessment or mitigation. It 'is the property owners responsibility
to notify this department of any changes.in site usage.
If you have any.questions regarding~this matter, Please contact me
at (805)-326-3797.
~/nc~re~y, ~ ~_.~
Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
'1
I
I
PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION
OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOILS AT
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY.
3725 SOUTH H STREET,
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
6501 McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, California
April 6, 1992
Project No. EB-8132-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION
OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOILS AT
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY.
3725 SOUTH H STREET,
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Site Description .......................................................................................... 2
1.2 Background ................................................................................................ 3
2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION ............................ ' .................................................. 4
2.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling ...................................................................... 4
2.2 Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................. 5
3.0 FINDINGS .............................................. : ................................................................ 6
3.1 Geologic Conditions ................................................................................... 6
3.2 Subsurface Conditions .............................................................................. 6
3.3 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................. 7
3.4 Soil Vapor Monitoring .............................................................................. 7
3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results ................................................................ 8
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 10
4.1 Remedial Alternatives .............................................................................. 11
5.0 CLOSURE ..................................... ' .................. · .......................................................... 13
REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 15
Figure 1
~ Figure 2
Figure 3
Vicinity Map .................................................................... ~ .......... 16
'Site Map .....~ .................................................................................. 18
Cross Section ................................................................................ 19
APPENDIX A Boring Logs
APPENDIX B Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
A Member of The Earth Systems Group
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B · Bakersfield, CA 93313 · (805) 836-0901 · FAX (805) 836-0911
I
I
I
April 6, 1992
Doc. No.: 9203-E082.RPT
Project No.: EB -8132 -1
I
I
Mr. Joe A. Dunwoody
City of Bakersfield Fire Department
Hazardous Materials Division
2101 H Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
SUB/F_~T:
PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION
OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOILS AT
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY.
3725 SOUTH H STREET,
BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE:
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN
OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOILS AT
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY.
3725 SOUTH H STREET,
BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a preliminary site characterization performed by
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. (ESE) at the above referenced site. The purpose of
the characterization was to assess the lateral and vertical extent of soil impacted by a
release from the west end of the former 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage
tank at the above referenced facility. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) were
detected at a 'concentration of 1,300 mg/kg at a depth of two feet, and at a
concentration of 1,200 rog/kg at a depth of six feet beneath the west-~'nd of the tank.
The gasoline constituent benzene was detected at a concentration of 6.0 mg/kg at a
depth of two feet, and but not detected at a depth of six feet beneath the ~west end of
· the .tank. The concentrations of TPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile
aromatics detected beneath the location of the former gasoline tank are in excess of
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) guidelines, and resulted in the Lead
ImPlementing Agency (LIA) which is the City of Bakersfield Fire Department~
· Hazardous Materials Division requesting that an initial site characterization
consisting of soil borings and laboratory analysis of soil samples be performed to
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
2 April 6, 1992
assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted s~ii in the vicinity of the
west end of the former gasoline tank. Soil samples collected from beneath the east
end of the former 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage .tank, and from beneath
the gasoline dispenser did not detect concentrations of gasoline in excess of RWQCB
guidelines, and therefore require no further assessment.
All methods to be employed are in compliance with regulations and guidelines set
forth in 'California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Article 11, and Title 23, Chapter
3, California Site Mitigation Decision Tree Manual, the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Title 29, Part 1910, Section 120, CFR Title 40, Parts 300-399, the Tri-Regional
Board 'Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of
Underground 'Tank Sites, as well as accepted professional
envir0nmental/geotechnical engineering procedures.
The scope of work for this project was developed in conjunction with Mr. Ed Wegemer
of the 'California Water Service Company and Mr. Joe A. Dunwoody of the City of
Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. In addition, remedial
action alternatives are presented. Work Performed to date includes the following:
Development of site health and safety, and technical work plans.
Drilling and sampling of four exploratory soil borings to a maximum depth
of 36 feet below surface gr. ade,
Laboratory analysis of thirteen selected soil samples for Total Purgeable
Hydrocarbons as gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics.
Preparation of this report presenting our results, conclusions, and
remedial .action alternatives for the site.
1.1 Site Description
The subject site is located on the west side of the South H Street in the southern area
of the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (Figure 1). The site is currently
used as the water service's engineering office with equipment and vehicle storage
areas.
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
3 April 6, 1992
The site is situated within a densely 'developed urban area. Surrounding properties
are' commercial businesses along the w~st side of South H Street, and residential
subdivisions. The topography is relatively flat, with a fall to the south.
1.2 Background
Based on a review of analytical results, and conversations with Ed Wegemer,
representing the California Water Service Company, on November 15, 1991, one 4,000
gallon underground gasoline storage tank, associated product pipeline and gasoline
dispenser were removed by Kern Environmental Service of Bakersfield, California
from the above referenced property which was a fueling~ facility for California
Water Service company (Figure 2). Soil samples were collected from beneath both
the east and west ends of the former gasoline tank as well as the former gasoline
dispenser at depths of 2 and 6 feet. The samples were analyzed for the presence of
total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile
aromatics (BTEX). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline were detected at a
concentration of 1,300 mg/kg at a depth of two feet, and at a concentration of 1,200
rog/kg at a depth of six feet beneath the west end of the tank. The gasoline
constituent benzene was detected at a concentration of 6.0 mg/kg at a depth of. two
feet, and but not detected at a depth of six feet beneath the west end of the tank. The
concentrations of TPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics
detected beneath the location of the former gasoline tank are in excess of Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) oguidelines, and resulted in the 'Lead
Implementing Agency (LIA) which is the City of Bakersfield Fire Department-
Hazardous. Materials Division requesting that an initial site characterization
consisting of soil borings and laboratory analysis of soil samples be performed to
assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil in the vicinity of the
west end of the former gasoline tank. Soil samples collected from beneath the east
end of the former 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, and from beneath
the gasoline dispenser did not detect concentrations of gasoline in excess of RWQCB
guidelines, and therefore require no further assessment. Reportedly, no soil was
removed from the site during removal of the tanks and dispensers; the area displaced
by the former tanks was filled with the overexcavated the excavated soil along with
imported soil.
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I.
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
California Water Service
4 April 6, 1992
Based on these analytical results ESE was retained by the Kern Environmental
Service to perform a site characterization on behalf of the California Water Service
Company in the vicinity of the former gasoline tank. Below are the results of the site
characterization.
2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION
2.1 Drilling .and Soil Sampling
Prior to commencing field operations, a technical work Plan was reviewed and
approved by City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division
personnel'. Underground Service Alert was notified 48 hours in advance of the site
activities. Drilling commenced on March 26, 1992 using a CMETM 55 truck mounted
drill rig, operated by Earth Systems ConSUltants, and equipped with 6-inch diameter
hollow-stem augers. The augers were steam cleaned prior to use in each bring to
minimize the possibility of cross-contamination.
Four soil borings were drilled within this phase of soil characterization (Figure 2).
One soil boring, TH-l, was 'drilled'through the center of the west end of the former
4,000 gallon gasoline tank location to 'a depth of 36 feet below surface grade to assess
vertical migration of gasoline hydrocarbons at that location. The second soil boring,
TH-2, was drilled 12 feet west southwest of boring. TH-1 to a depth of 21 feet at a
location five feet south of the former gasoline dispenser. The third soil boring, TH-3,
was drilled 12 feet east southeast of boring TH-1 to a depth of 26 feet at a location
three feet south of the center of the east end of the. former 4,000 gallon gasoline tank.
The fourth soil boring, TH-4, was drilled.5 feet north of boring TH-1 to a depth of 21
feet.
A California Registered Geologist was on site to log the borings, monitor soils during
drilling for contamination, and collect soil samples. Boring logs are presented in
Appendix A.
Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals in each of the borings using a split-
spoon sampler (ASTM D 3550 with shoe siml]ar to ASTM D 1586) equipped with three 6-
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
5 April 6, 1992
inch by 2.5-inch diameter brass sleeves for soil retention. The soil samples were
obtained by driving the sampler with a 140-pound hammer.dropping 30 inches in
accordance with ASTM D 1586.
The lowermost sleeve at each sample interval was screened for total organic vapors
with a photo-ionization .detector (PID). Headspace vapor analysis was performed by
'first discarding a portion of the soil. retained at one end' of the sleeve to Produce a
headspace. The sleeve, was then capped and the probe of the PID was inserted
through a hole in the cap and into the headspace for analysis. The PID readings are
recorded on the boring logs and in Table 1 (see section~.3.5, .Soil Vapor Monitoring).
The middle sample sleeve was~ immediately sealed with Teflon® film, capped, and
Placed on ice for transport to Mobile Laboratories, Inc. in Bakersfield, a California
Department of Health Services (DOHs) certified laboratory. Chain of custody
procedures were utilized for all samples collected.
Sampling equipment was washed with TSP (tri-sodium phosphate) cleanser,-and
rinsed with tap water and de-ionized water prior to sampling,, between sample
intervals, and between borings to minimize the potential of cross contamination.
The augers were steam' cleaned prior to drilling and between borings to minimize the
potential of cross contamination. Since no gasoline hydrocarbons were field
screened in any of the four borings, the borings were backfilled with the clean
native soil and topped with a neat cement plug.
2.2 Laboratory Analysis
Thirteen soil samples were submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Selection of soil
samples for analysis was based on: a) observations and greatest PID readings of
odorous soil, b) observations and PID readings of the first encountered sampling
locations containing apparently uncontaminated soils, which would serve to define
the' lateral and vertical extent of contamination, and c) requirements that the
'loWermost sample of each boring be submitted for analysis along with the two
· successive "clean" samples from the bottom of the vertical assessing boring. The
eight samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene,, ethylbenzene and total xylenes
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
California Water Service
6 April 6, 199'2
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(BTEX) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Method 8020, and for Total
Purgeable Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by the DOHS LUFT Manual Method.
3.0 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
3.1 Geologic Conditions
Regional Geology: The site is located in the southern part of the Great Valley
geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south trending valley,
approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide. Surface and groundwater in the San
Joaquin Valley is derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada mountain range-to
the east, and is transported by five major rivers, the southern most being the Kern
River. The subject site is located approximately 5 miles soUth of the Kern River..
The Surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated
Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent. (11,000 years ago to the
present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly
lake bed deposits. These' lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments which
extent to crystalline basement at approximately 20,000 feet..
Site Geology:' Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial
sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping gently to
the southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting 'of poorly indurated and dissected.
fan deposits (CDMG, 1964).
The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer is approximately 170 feet below surface
grade beneath the site (Kern County Water Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1990
Report on Water. Conditions, February 1, 1991). However, perched ground water is
known to exist 1 mile to the east at a depth of 20 feet in the abandoned Kern River
channel to the ancient Kern Lake Bed (Kern County Water Agency, 1990 Water
Supply Report, May 1991).' No perched ground water is known to exist beneath the
subject site.
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
!
i
California Water Service
7 April 6, 1992
3.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface material encountered during drilling included artificial fill underlain by
alluvium to the total depth of each boring. The artificial fill was encountered in the
upper portion of all three borings from the surface to depths' ranging from
approximately 5 to 6 feet. The fill consisted of a dark brown, fine- to medium-
grained, poorly graded, silty sand (SM)
The alluvium was characterized by unconsolidated light tan fine- to coarse-grained
sand (SW) to a depth of approximately 41 feet, interbedded by a single two foot layer
of light olive gray silty clay (CL), between the depths of 25.5 feet to 27.5 feet in each
boring. A Cross Section has been prepared which integrates the geology, the
location of the former tank, and the distribution of gasoline hydrocarbons 'in the
subsurface to yield an interpretation of limit of gasoline hydrocarbons in excess of
RWQCB Action Levels (Figure 3).
3.3 Hydrogeology
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings drilled during this project.
The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer is approximately 170 feet below surface
grade' beneath the site (Kern County Water .Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1990
Report on Water Conditions, February 1, 1991). However, perched ground water is
known to exist 1 mile to the east at a depth of 20 feet in the abandoned Kern River
channel to the ancient Kern Lake Bed (Kern County Water Agency, 1990 Water
Supply Report, May 1991). No perched ground water is known to exist beneath the
subject site.
3.4 Soil Vapor Monitoring
Soil samples collected during drilling were monitored with a photo-ionization
detector (PID) to evaluate organic vapor concentrations. The PID was calibrated with
an isobutylene standard of 100 parts per million (ppm) ,and contained an 11.8
electron volt (eV) lamp, capable of de.tecting benzene (9.25 eV). Table 1~' Soil Organic
Vapor Concentrations, graphically presents the PID readings. Appendix A Boring
Logs, presents the. PID readings as they were recorded in the field.
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
California Water Service
April 6, 1992
TABLE- 1
SUMMARY OF SOIL ORGANIC VAPOR CONCENTRATIONS
(values in parts per million)
5 ND ND. ND ND
l0 ND ND ND ND
15 ND. ND ND ND
2{) ND ND ND ND
25 ND ND
30 ,ND
35 ND
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
ND: Not detected.
As Table 1 indicates, no soil vapor concentrations were detected in any of the soil
samples'~ obtained from boring TH-1 through the center of the west end of the tank,
from soil boring TI-I-2 positioned five south of the former gasoline dispenser, from
soil boring TH-3 position three feet south of the center of the east end of the former
tank, or from soil boring TH-4 positioned five feet north of the center of the west end
of the former tank. These field .observations are collaborated by the following
laboratory results.
3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results
None of the thirteen samples analyzed contained detectable concentrations of total
purgeable hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline or the gasoline cOnstituent volatile
aromatics.
Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for gasoline, and the
gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total
xylenes have been calculated using the LUFT 'methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to
'account for attenuation due to site-specific parameters including vertical separation
to ground water, soil lithology, fractures in subsurfaces, annual 'average
precipitation, and any direct conduits to ground water. The' recommended guidelines
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
California Water Service
9 April 6, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
are 1,000 mg/kg for TPH as gasoline, 1.0 mg/kg for benzene, and toluene, and 50.0
mg/kg for ethylbenzene and total xylenes.
Laboratory analytical results for the eight selected soil samples from the four
borings are summarized in Table 2 Summary of Analytical Results. Copies of the
analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are presented in Appendix B
Laboratory Analytical Results.
TABLE-2
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
(values in milligram per kilogr m)
,, Gasoline~ , , ,,, benze,ne · Xyiene,s
TH-I 20' ND ND ND ND ND
TH- 1 25' ND ND ND ND' ND
TH-1 30' ND ND ND ND.. ND
TH- 1 35' ND ND ND ND ND
TH-2 10' ND ND ND ND ND
TH-2 15' ND ND ND ND ND.,
TH-2 20' ND ND ND ND ,ND
TH- 3 15' ND ND . ND ND ND,
TH-3 20' ND ND ND ND ND
TH-3 ............ ~ 5.".~__ ..... _ND ~_ I' ND - ND ND
TH-4 10' ND ND ... ND ND ND
TH-4 , 15' ND ND ND ND . , , ND
TH-4 20' ND ND ND ND ND
A L NA 1 ~00,0 1~ 1 50, 50
' 0 ~' ..... 0.005'
MRL NA 5 .00~, ,,,. ........ 0.005 0.005
ND: None Detected at or above Minimum Reporting Level (MRL).
NA: Not Applicable.
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for concentrations in soil.
Recommended guidelines were calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to account for
attenuation due to soil composition and distance from groundwater.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The data obtained from 'the tank removal operations suggest that soil impacted with
gasoline hydrocarbons at concentrations in excess RWQCB recommended guidelines
exist at the subject site in an area beneath the center of the west end of the former
location of the 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, but not beneath the
EB-8132-1'
9203-E082.RPT
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'California Water Service
1 0 April 6, 1992
center of the east end of the tank, or beneath the former gasoline dispenser. ESE's
subsequent soil drilling activities could not confirm the presence of any soil
impacted by gasoline hydrocarbons beneath the former location of the tank. It
appears that the gasoline impacted soil is. confined to a very limit volume which was
not encountered by any of the soil borings which clustered around the ~presumed
release point in this assessment. Based on the field information and analytical data, it
appears that if remediation measures are undertaken in the subsurface beneath the
former tank, they would involve a very minor amount of soil, if any impacted soil
remains.
4.1 Remedial Action Alternatives
At least three options for' remediation of the soil are applicable to the site; 1) in~situ
vapor extraction, 2) excavation and controlled aeration, and 3) no action,
Option 1 is to treat the soil in place through in-situ vapor extraction. This involves
installing vapor extraction wells through the impacted soil, placing a vacuum on the
well and extracting the gasoline hydrocarbons. The soil lithology is suitable for this
technology given the high permeabilities. ESE does not recommend this process
since the impacted soil observed during the tank removal is at shallow depths and
can be easily excavated. Additionally, ESE could not confirm the presence of any
remaining gasOline impacted soil at the site.
Option 2 involves excavating the soil until field hydrocarbon screening indicates
that the limits of contamination have been reached and treating the soil to non
hazardous concentrations through the process of' controlled aeration at the subject
property. The small volume of impacted soil involved, and available space to do
surface treatment makes this option very suitable at the site. In ESE's opinion, a
very minor volume or no soil would be excavated which was impacted with gasoline
hydrocarbons. The very slight risk to the environment presented by the soil does
not warrant the expense of the excavation.
The third option, natural in-situ biodegradation (i.e., no action), is viable given the
small volume of contamination which may remain in the soil, if any impacted soil
EB-8132-1
9203:E082.RPT
I
I
California Water Service
11
April. 6, 1992
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
does remain in the soil. Additionally, the vertical separation to groundwater is 170
feet at the site, therefore the risk ·of leaching' to groundwater is very remote.
While all of the above options are applicable to the site, ESE believes that the no
action option .is the most appropriate and cost effective given that no gasoline
hydrocarbons Were detected in .the site characterization, no gasoline like odors
observed· in any of the soil samples field screened, and the vertical separation of over
170 feet to .groundwater at the~ site. Therefore, ESE recommends the no action
alternative.
5.0 CLOSURE
This report, has been prepared for the exclusive use of Ed Wegemer of the California
Water Service Company as it pertains 'to the location of the former gasoline tank at
the engineering office in Bakersfield, California. The results contained in each
verbal or written report are based upon the~ information acquired during the
assessment. It is possible that variations could exist beyond points explored during
the course of ~he 'investigation. Also, changes in conditions found could, occur at
some time in the future due to contaminant migration, variations in rainfall,
temperature, and/or other factors not apparent at the time of the field investigation.
This report should not be regarded as a guarantee that no further contamination,
beyond that which may have been detected within the scope of this study, is present
on or beneath the Site. If additional information regarding the possible·presence or
past use of hazardous materials at the site becomes available, then the need for
further field investigation, should be re-evaluated. Similarly, if suspected
contamination is encountered during earthwork or construction activities, a
qualified engineer' or geologist should be on-site to monitor the soils and collect
samples for laboratory analysis. The services performed by ESE were conducted in a
manner consistent with .the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members
of our profession ·currently prac'ticing under similar conditions i? the state of
· California. No other warranty is expressed or implied.
EB-8132-1
9203-E082.RPT
California Water Service
1 2 April 6, 1992
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding
this or the information contained herein, please contact this office at
report
your
convenience.
Sincerely,
EARTH SYsTEMs ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
'Mark I~. Magarg~, ~i~.G.
Senior Geologist :~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I - Addressee
1 -, Mr. Ed Wegemer/ California Water Service Company
1 - Mr. Chris DeArmon/Kern Environmental Service
1 - Bakersfield File
1 - San Luis Obispo File
EB-8132-1
9203-EO82.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
i
!
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
'1
California Water Service
1 3 April 6; 1992
REFERENCES
California Division of Mines and Geology, 1964, Geologic Map of California.
Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and
Investigation of ~Underground Tank Sites
California Water Resources Control Board, 1989, LUFT Manual Guidance
Document.
California Water Quality Control Board-Central Valley Region, Compilation of
Water Quality Goals, October 1990.
EB-8132-1
9203~E082.RPT
~[~,. /IUIK~' ~;d-',,~,~ "~aunel~ ~d~ll~° ~'"~CHI:'
'~ q III~ · m o tlofdenWy. Slillman~ ,: ~ ~ xx" '.---- ' /' Ill
~ ~; I1,1 ~,. ~ ~~ ~ Im ~; ~ ~ A South,
%ye.4 Vi;Ia 0 ~ . ~ ~NormanAvel; ~ ~ ~ .... ~:...~.,~'.;:.~
. j,~-- ' : '.~. Anton,a Wv ' ' '
. Michtli~ Hill . c ~: ~ ~ E' --~ b~ ~ ~_ , 7
> ~ ~ ~ -- l~ ~ , blOIleV 0 ' · lll.
I~id~~J~L" L~ ~,~,~.~_ ~~~.~.ili ~il
.................................. ~.~-~f~,-~-~ - ,~-~
) Valley · ~ M,-E~ .McCall ~ve. I : ~2'"'L ~ I~ r~e Ave.
.~ ~ Ave. ~ -- ~ ~'c ~ ~ ~ -
~. '~ bi. ~ ~o .~ '-~'.~
~ ~ I(GL~ ~WHITE ~ ~ ~ ::,E~~' I7. EArl
. e ~ Vm nte Dr
~ ~ ara 0 C ~l "m -- i " '~ ~.~fl
~ ,,,n ~ , ~ o . ' ~ . ~ Ct.I .
EaCh Systoms TITLE Figure
Envir°nmontal' Inc' C~Z/~~T~~~V~~
6701 McDiviII Drive, Suile B
Baker sfield, CA 93313 ~~/~
~805) 836-~0~ -: · -,. JOB NO.
F~
836-0911
0 EaCh Systems TITLE Figure
A Member of The Each Syslems Group
6701 McDivilt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield. CA 93313
(805) 836-0901
15'--
35--
,4
Ttf -Z
_1
--5'
--15'
,'vz3
6701 McOivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, CA 93313
(805) 836-0901
FAX (805) 836-0911
I
!
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
Boring Logs
WELL ";~" ~' -~o ~'' o
CObI~-I'RUCTION 5~:~ ~10 m° ~'~e, , A ~ ~OIL DESCRIP'~0N
I I ' a' ¢ ~"/I I~ I
I I I I I
I ~ I I I
I
I I. I I _~_
I
i I I ~ !1
!
I I I I I I
I I i~ i~1 I ' ' ' ' /
i i
I ! ~ f' ~ ~ ---
I I I I .! II
· I I
I I I I I II
I I I I I I
I I I I I II
I I I I I, II
I. I I I I II
.....
~ ~ I i-'~ ~1 ....
I I I I I II
~ .. I ~ I
~ !
t
I I I I II
I ! I I II
It I II
~ I I II
II I II
I I
I I
~/~"~ ~-' ~ ~ ~~~ ~' ~'- ~'~/~' '~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~LATE
~/'~,'~ ~/~ ~,~e L 0 G o L B 0 R I N G
- / /
Pro[ecl Numbe~
- o .o SOIL: DESCRIPTION
WELL
I u uz j,,,]l I~ II _
I I I Ij
I I I II ,,~
I I I I '
II I
I I I I I
t I
I
I I I I tl '
I I I II
I I I I II ' T x~, '
I I ! I II
I I I I II
I I t I .11
I I I I II
I I I I II
I I I I II
I I I I II
I I I I II
I I I I II
i I i I II
I I I I II
I I i I II
I , !
I I
i1'
I I I Ij
I,,,I,
I I
J I I
II t
I I
I ,,, 11
I I I I II
I I I ,I !1
~~~,~
WELL
CONSTRUCTION
I I ,. ~-. ~,., v, '"1 I~ II ..
I I
I I I I I
I
I h t c , ~.'//v .~-,,~-,..~,,~/~,~,~,,.,.,,~...~,'.~.
I I !
I I I I .I
i I I II
I
I
] I i , i Il
I I '1 I I II - ...
[ I I I I I'
· I I I II
I I I I I fl .
~ ~ ! ~ i !~ .,
I I I I I II
I I I I,/,~ I .~r- III
I I I I I I-I
I I I I I II
I · I I
I I I I I II
I I I I Ii
.I
I I I I I II
I I I I I II
I I i t I II
~ ! i I I II
~ I I i ~ II
~ .... ~ ~.~ ~ ~
~ I' t ~ t,,
I II
,I I
I I I I II
I I I I I
I
I !I I II
I I I I I
I I I I I I1 -
WELL
I
I I I I
I I t
I I
I I I I I
I I
i I I I I
I I I I II
I I I I II
! I I ~ II
I I I I .Il
I I i I II
I I I I II
I I I t II
I I I I II
I I I I II .,
! I i i ii
,.I t
I
I I I II
I I I,
I I I I
~~~~ ~~ ~~'~ L 0 G o f. B 0 R I N G
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Nevada
5327 Wingfoot Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93306
(805) 872-4750
Arizona
Laboratory Results For :
California Water Service
3725 South H Street
Bakersfield, CA
Sample Matrix ; Soils
Date Received : 3/26/92
Date Analyzed : 4/1/92
Analyst : J.S. Johnson
Lab No. 920046
Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Tot Pet Hyds
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
TH-1 '~20
TH-1 ~25
TH-1 ~30
TH-1 ~35
TH-2 ~10
TH-2 ~15
TH-2 ~20
TH-3 ~15
TH-3 ~20
TH-3 ~25
TH-4 ~10
TH-4 ~15
TH-4 620
QA/QC Spike
% Recovery
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
94 92 96 98 108 Gasoline
All .Results Reported in Milligrams per Kilogram
ND = Non Detectable ; EPA 8020 (.005 mg/kg)
EPA 8015 Modified for Gasoline (5 mg/kg)
Analysis of Volatile Aromatics ; EPA 8020
*Analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ; EPA 8015 Modified for Gasoline
*The TPH Method for Gasoline is the Callf DOHS Recommended Procedure
certified Full Service On-Site Analytical Lab~eties ~/
n- tr'
I- I--
LJ Z Z
0 m ~ ~
) w w
_ ~
D D ~
~ S~3NIV~NO0 0 0~ w
-- Z Z
~ ao 'ON ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 0
Z Z Z
I
'1
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
"WE CARE"
FIRE DEPARTMENT
S. 13. JOHNSON
FIRE CHIEF
March 18, 1992
2101H STREET
BAKERSFIELD, 93301
326-3911
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
6701McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Attn: Mark Magargee
RE:
Site assessment work plan for the facility located
at 3725 South "H" Street, Bakersfield, CA.
Dear Mr. Magargee,
This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated
address is' satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days
notice prior to the commencement of work.
Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under
direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unl'ess
previously approved.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
Sincerely, '
//Joe A. Dunwood~
~ .H._az~a~rdous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WORK PLAN FOR
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY
. UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION
3725 SOUTH H STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
February 18, 1992
Prepared by
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, California 93313
(805) 836-0901
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................. .' ......................... ; ................................... 2
BACKGROUND .................................................................... : ......................................... 2
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN ...................................................................... 3
SITE CHARACTERIZATION ..................................................................................... 3
Soil Boring Drilling and Sampling .......................................................... 3
Chemical Analysis Of Soil Samples ........................................................ 6
REPORT OF FINDINGS .............................................................................................. 6
SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION ...... ~ ........................................................................... 7
FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP ................................................................................... 8
FIGURE 2 - SITE MAP .................................................................... ; ................. ' ....... 9
APPENDIX A
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN~
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 24, 1992
Doc. No.: 9202-E0571PRP
Project No.: EB~8132-1
Mr. Joe A. Dunwoody
City of Bakersfield Fire Department
Hazardous Materials Division
2101 H Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
SUBJECT:
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN
OF GASOLINE. IMPACTED SOILS AT
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY.
3725 SOUTH H STREET; .
BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Dunwoody,
This communication presents our work plan for soil characterization activities at the
above referenced site (Figure 1). Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. (ESE) proposes
to conduct a Phase I Soil Characterization associated with a release from the west end
of~ the former 4,000 gallOn underground gasoline storage tank at the above
referenced facility. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected at a
concentration of 1,300 mg/kg~ at a depth of two feet, and at a concentration of 1,200
mg/kg at a depth of six feet beneath the west end of the tank. The gasoline
constituent benzene was detected at a concentration of 6.0 mg/kg at a depth of two
feet, and but not detected at a depth of six feet beneath the west end of the tank. The
concentrations of TPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics
detected beneath the location of the former gasoline tank are in excess of Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) guidelines, and have resulted in the Lead
Implementing Agency (LIA) which is the City of Bakersfield Fire Department-
Hazardous Materials Division requesting that an initial site characterization
consisting of soil borings and laboratory analysis of soil samples be performed to
assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil in the vicinity of the
west end of the former gasoline tank. Soil samples collected from beneath the east
end of the former 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, and from beneath
the gasoline, dispenser .did not detect concentrations of gasoline in excess, of RWQCB
guidelines, and therefore require no further assessment. ESE proposes to conduct an
1
I
California Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
initial site characterization consisting of four soil borings and laboratory analysis of
fifteen soil samples to assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil
in the vicinity of the-former tank. Upon completion of the field investigation, and
receipt of the laboratory data, ESE will prepare a report of findings documenting the
field activities, analytical results, data analysis, conclusions and recommendations
resulting from the soil, and groundwater characterizations.
'All methods to be employed are in compliance with regulations and guidelines set
forth in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Article 11, and Title 23, Chapter
3, California Site Mitigation Decision Tree Manual, the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Title 29, Part 1910, Section 120, CFR Title 40, Parts 300-399, and the Tri-Regional
Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of
Underground Tank Sites, as Well as accepted professional
environmental/geotechnical engineering procedures.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Subject to your acceptance of this work plan, ESE's plan to investigate the soil, and
groundwater includes:
Prepare a Site Health and Safety Plan covering the field operations associated
with this investigation.
Conduct a Phase I Soil Characterization in the vicinity of the former
underground gasoline storage tank including the drilling of four soil borings,
sampling and laboratory analysis of fifteen samples from these borings
depending on the depth for the Presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons as
gasoline and volatile aromatics.
Preparation of a Report of Findings documenting the field activities, analytical
results, data analysis, conclusions and recommendations resulting from the
soil investigation.
BACKGROUND
On November 15, 1991, one 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, associated
product pipeline and gasoline' dispenser were removed by Kern Environmental
Service of Bakersfield, California from the above referenced property which was a
fueling facility for California Water Service Company (Figure 2). Soil samples were
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
February 24, 1992
collected from beneath both the east and west ends of the former gasoline tank as
well as the former gasoline dispenser at depths of 2 and 6 feet. The samples were
analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline, and the
gasoline constituent volatile aromatics (BTEX). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
as gasoline were detected at a concentration of 1,300 mg/kg at a depth of two feet, and
at a concentration of 1,200 mg/kg at a depth of six feet beneath the west end of the
tank. The gasoline constituent benzene was detected at a concentration of 6.0 mg/kg
at a depth of tWo feet, and but not detected at a depth of six feet bene, ath the west end
of the tank. The concentrations of TPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent
volatile aromatics detected, beneath the location of the former gasoline tank are in
excess of Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) guidelines, and have resulted
in 'the Lead Implementing Agency (LIA) Which is the City of Bakersfield Fire
Department-Hazardous Materials Division requesting that an initial site
characterization consisting of soil borings and. laboratory analysis of soil samples be
performed to assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil .in the
vicinity of the west end of the former gasoline tank. Soil samples collected from
beneath the east end of the former 4,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank,
and from beneath the gasoline dispenser did not detect concentrations of gasoline in
excess of RWQCB guidelines, and therefore require no further assessment.
HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
A written Health and Safety plan will be implemented for site work conducted during
the field investigations'conducted for this project. The purpose of the plan is to
provide specific safety procedures to be implemented during the handling of
petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated materials. The Health and Safety Plan is
required under regulations Set forth in Federal OSHA CFR 29 1910.120, since the
referenced data documented the presence of potentially hazardous materials at the
site. This Health and Safety plan is included as Appendix A to the work plan.
· SITE CHARACTERIZATION
Soil Boring Drilling and Sampling
Prior to drilling, Underground Service Alert (USA) will be notified a minimum of 48
hours in advance drilling activities. A total of four soil borings will be drilled within
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
February 24, 1992
this phase of soil characterization (Figure 2). One soil boring will be drilled through
the center of the west end of the former 4,000 gallon gasoline tank location to assess
vertical migration of gasoline hydrocarbons at that location. The other three soil
borings will be drilled at varying distances laterally from this location to assess the
lateral limits of gasoline hydrocarbons. One of these borings will be positioned 15
feet to the southeast in the presumed downgradient location (Kern County Water
Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1990 Report on Water Conditions, February 1,
1991). The third boring will be drilled to the southwest of the tank, and the fourth
boring will be drilled to the north of the tank. The distance from the tank will be
varied depending on whether gasoline hydrocarbons are field screened in the
second boring. If none are field screened then the third boring will be position 10
feet from the former tank. However, if gasoline hydrocarbons are field screened in
the second boring then the third boring will be positioned from 20 to 25 feet from the
former tank depending on how significant were the field screened concentrations in
the second boring. The same procedure will be used to determine the distance that
the fourth boring will be positioned from the tank. Drilling for all borings will be
accomplished using a truck mounted CMETM 55 drill rig or equivalent utilizing 4 3/4-
inch outside diameter hollow-stem augers. At no. time will any drilling fluids
including water be used during drilling. The borings will be drilled to a depth of 10
consecutive feet of unimpacted soil, impermeable soil or granite, or to the first
encountered groundwater. The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer is
approximately 170 feet below surface grade beneath the site (Kern County Water
Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1990 'Report on Water Conditions, February 1,
1991). California Water Service Company operates two municipal water supplies wells
on the subject property within 100 feet of the former underground gasoline tank.
These wells are screened within the upper unconfined aquifer with the top of
perforations at 210 feet below surface grade. Laboratory analysis of water samples
from these two wells has not detected the presence of gasoline or gasoline constituent
volatile aromatics. The nearest known-occurrence 'of perched groundwater is 1 mile
to the east at a depth of 20 feet in the abandoned Kern River channel tO the ancient
Kern Lake Bed (Kern County Water Agency, 1990 Water Supply Report, May 1991).. No
perched groundwater is known to exist beneath the subject site. Any soil boring
which encounters the capillary fringe to groundwater will be terminated at that
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
CalifOrnia Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
depth,' a soil sample will be collected from that depth, and the boring will be
abandoned by backfilling with a neat cement-bentOnite-sand slurry.
Soil sampling will be performed while drilling the borings at a fi~,e foot interval
beginning at 5 feet below grade tO the designed termination depth. Soil sampling
will be accomplished using a split-spoon ~ampler (ASTM D 3550 with shoe similar to
ASTM D 1586) equipped with three 6-inch by 2.5-inch diameter brass sleeves for soil
retention. '-The soil samples will be obtained by driving the sampler with a one
hundred and forty pound hammer dropping thirty inches in accordance with ASTM D
1586.
Th~ lowermost sleeve at each sample interval (corresponding to approximately 6
inches below the actual sample interval) will be screened for total ~organic vapors
with a portable photo-ionization detector (PID) or a Foxboro® OVA (organic vapor
analyzer) 108 flame-ionization meter (FID). Headspace vapor analysis will be
performed by first discarding a portion of the soil retained at one end of the sleeve to
produce a headspace. The sleeve 'is then capped and the probe of the PID or FID
inserted through a hole in the cap and into the headspace for analysis. The PID or
FID readings will be recorded on the boring logs. The uppermost sleeve will be
observed for lithol0gy.
The middle sample sleeve of the sampler will be immediately sealed with TeflonTM
film, capped, labeled, and placed on ice at 4°C for transport to a California Department
of Health Services (DHS) certified laboratory. Strict chain-of-custody procedures will
be utilized for all samples collected to ensure sample integrity and to document
sample possession from the time of collection to the final destination. Laboratory
analysis will be performed on all of the samples from the vertical assessing boring,
except those near surface samples from within the backfilled excavation pit, and
those samples which would duplicate the two and six foot samples retrieved during
the tank removal. A minimum of the two deepest "clean" samples collected from the
two lateral assessing borings will be retained for laboratory analysis as well as
enough samples from above that depth to adequately described the profile of gasoline
concentrations. These additional selected soil samples will consist of the sample from
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California Water Service
6
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
each lateral assessing boring which is field screened as having the highest
concentration of volatile hydrocarbons. It is estimated that fifteen soil samples will
be analyzed depending on the depth of the borings.
All sampling equipment will be washed with TSP (tri-sodium phosphate) cleanser,
and rinsed with tap water and de-ionized water prior to sampling, between sample
intervals, and between borings to reduce the possibility of' cross-contamination. The
drilling augers will be steam cleaned between borings, also to reduce the possibility
of cross-contamination. Drill cuttings, and soil sample spoils,will be 'contained in
D.O.T. approved 55 gallon drums awaiting confirmation from laboratory analysis as to
· whether the contents are hazardous. Disposal of' any contaminated soil is tl~e
responsibility of the facility operator. Any soil borings field screened as impacted
with gasoline hydrocarbons shall be backfilled with a neat cement slurry. Soil
borings field screened as unimpacted shall be backfilled with clean fill material, and
capped with a five foot neat cement plug.
A field engineer or geologist will be on-site to log the borings in accordance with the
Unified Soil Classification .System, monitor soils during drilling for contamination,
collect soil samples, and. abandonment of the soil borings.
Laboratory Analysis of Soil Samples
Soil samples will be sent to Mobile' Labs, Inc., a state-certified laboratory, for
chemical analysis. The selected soil samples will be analyzed for total purgeable
hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX).using the California DOHS
LUFT Method for gasoline, and USEPA Test Method 8020.
REPORT OF FINDINGS
A report will be prepared which details the field activities, sampling procedures,
analytical results, data analysis, conclusions, and recommendations. Based upon the
conclusions, Earth Systems Environmental Will recommend what further actions, if
necessary, should be performed. The report will be prepared under the supervision
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
!
!
California Water Service 7 February 24, 1992
of a Registered Professional. Certified laboratory reports and chain of custody
documents will be included.
SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION
Earth Systems Environmental can mobilize on-site beginning work described in this
work plan within approximately one week upon authorization to proceed from Client,
and approval of the work plan by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department-Hazardous
Materials Division. The projected time frame for completion of the major tasks is one
day for drilling and sampling the wells, two weeks for laboratory analysis, and two
weeks for report preparation once the laboratory analysis has been completed.
Thank you for your consideration of this work plan. If you have any questions, or if
we can be of service in any way, please contact this office at your convenience.
Respectfully Submitted, ' '
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
~l-~r~c-~t'~-~V~a ga
Senior Geologist ~
cc: Addressee - 1
California Water Service - Ed Wegemer - 1
Kern Environmental Service - Chris DeArmon 1
BAK - 1
SLO- 1
I
,,!
EB-8132-1
9202-EO57.WP
' ' ~~1 / ~T.~-~ ~ I~ ~ ~ %X~ South ~
~'. ~1 = I /.~TUiJ% I~ ;~.~;'~. WEST '-- ~ Ii 5 ~ : ',4 ~--I I=
,.A~ c~.~ Il Gemline 4~L~[~IA'.wesfl,aven ~ ~ alOorian O,. ~%Z~
. Mcheli - c J: ~ ~ E' --~ ~, ~-- ~- ~ ·
....
'0 '~ ..... ~Ave '.--~ ~ ~'= · ~ ..... ~~ CIF.D~ : . ·
~ , ~ e m ~ v HIGH SCH.
/~'2~ ~ ~ Ave. ~,o~ Sa~rg'o ~ I~ ~~e. P~X~( SCH. II
] - .. ~ , -,, ~cCal] ~ve. I ~ ~-~D" ~ I-' I~ ~/~ ~o~~..~. I~'-- II X /o
Caral Rock Rd Ave · n~o '- 'R' ~'--~N .... :-- ~ --
I
~ . .- oarfeldAv E m .- c
~ ~ ~l Xl~')/ o1/~ / I ~ ~Vicente~ ~ Aru re~~.'.llj
4~' : . r abra ~ ~ . ' .... = o : ~ : il A~ ~ ~ -
~Rokan~v.~ J I~ [~ .~:~[ ,,,. ~av'l'~~~'~ ~ ~ --
m ~t j I Il f~Aqresa Ct , ~l ; Z ~ .~1 ~1 J
c ~ . c Ma; alo . W . . J __ ~_ lsd O nh o C "-- o
EaCh Systems TITLE Figure
A Member of The Earth Systems Group
~701 ~oDiviU Drive, ~uile D
Bakersfield, CA 93313 ~~//~/
(805) 836-090~ JOB NO.
VICI /TY
F~
836-0911
I
1
O EaCh Systems TITLE Figure
A Member of The EaCh Systems Group
"
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, CA 93313
(805) 836-0901 JOB NO.
I
I.
I
!
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
!
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located on west side of South H Street, in Bakersfield, Kern County,
California. The site was used as a fueling facility for California Water Service
Company.
The site is situated within a predominantly developed urban area. The developments
include residential homes, and commercial businesses along the west side of South H
Street. The Kern Island Canal runs along the east side of South H Street. · California
Water Service Company operates two municipal water supply wells within 100 feet of
the former gasoline tank. The overall site topography is essentially flat with a very
slight fall to the south.
SITE HISTORY
Based on a review of analytical results, and conversations with Chris DeArmon
representing Kern Environmental Service., one 4,000 gallon underground gasoline
tank, product pipeline, and dispenser were removed by the Kern Environmental
Service of Bakersfield, California under permit with the .Kern County Department of
Environmental Health Services on November 15, 1991. Reportedly, no soil was
removed from the site during removal of the tank and dispenser, and the area
displaced by the former tank was filled by backfilling the excavated soil along with
imported soil.
During the UST removal activities on November 15, 1991, soil samples were collected
from beneath the tank and dispenser. Subsequent laboratory analysis of the soil
samples indicated 'that concentrations of total petrOleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as
gasoline and the .gasoline constituent volatile aromatics beneath the former gasoline
tank were in excess of State Water Resources Control Board (WRCB) Action Levels for
these compounds, in soil.
Based on these analytical results ESE has been retained to perform a site
characterization in the vicinity of the former gasoline tank.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
!
I
California Water Service
4
February 24, 1992
PURPOSE
The purpose of .this plan, which was developed specifically for operations at the
referenced site, is to assign responsibilities, establish personnel protection standards
and mandatory safety procedures, and provide for contingencies that may arise
while field operations associated investigating soil and groundwater are being
conducted at the site. This plan complies with, but does not replace, Federal Health
and Safety Regulations as set forth in 29 CFR 1910 and 1926, California Health and
Safety Regulations set forth in Title 8, California Code of Regulations, and guidance
established by the California Department of Health Services. This plan is to be used
by ESE as a supplement to such rules, regulations, and guidance.
APPLICABILITY
The provisions of the plan are mandatory for all on-site ESE employees engaged in
activities known to be or potentia!ly associated with the presence of hazardous
materials. These activities may include, but are not limited to, mobilization, project
operations, and demobilization.
Changes and/or unanticipated site conditions may require modification of this Site
Health and Safety Plan (SHSP) in order to maintain a safe work environment. Any
proposed changes to this plan should be reviewed by the Corporate Health and Safety
Officer of ESE, prior to their implementation.
If this is not feasible, the project team leader may modify the plan and record all
changes in the field log book. Under no circumstances will the plan modifications
conflict with Federal, state, or local health and safety regulations.
Under 29 CFR 1910.120 (b) (15) ESE is required to notify each subcontractor of the
hazardous materials identified by ESE. The acceptance of such responsibility does not
and shall not be deemed an acceptance of responsibility for any other health and
safety requirements, such as those related to excavating, trenching, drilling or
backfilling. Each subcontractor shall perform .all work in accordance with a Site
Health and Safety Plan for its. employees, which covers any exposure to hazardous
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
!
1
Californ/a Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
materials which may be present on site. The subcontractor shall hold ESE harmless
from, and indemnify it against, all liability in the case of any injury or injury of its
own employees. ESE reserves the right to review the subeontractor's Site Health and
Safety Plan at any time.
ESE reserves the right to suspend the subcontractor's site work and ask the
subcontractor's personnel to evacuate the hazard area in the event of grossly
inadequate health and saf,ety precautions on the part of the subcontractor or the
belief that the subeontractor's personnel are or may be exposed to an immediate
health hazard.
KEY PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The key personnel and their responsibilities for this project are as follows;
Corporate.. Health and Safety Officer
The ESE Corporate Health and Safety Officer (CHSO) for this project is Mr. Robert
Mohle. It is his responsibility for developing and coordinating the ESE health and
safety programs. For this project, he is responsible for reviewing and approving
this SHSP for accuracy and incorporating new information or guidelines which aid
the Project Manager and Site Health and Safety Officer in further definition and
control of potential health and safety hazards associated with the project.
Project Manager
The ESE Project Manager (PM) for this project is Mr. Mark Magargee. It i~ his
responsibility to' report to upper-level management. The duties of the PM are as
follows:
· Prepare and organize the SHSP which describes all planned field activities
that may be encountered at the site.
· Obtains permission for site access and coordinate field activities.
· Brief field team on specific assignments and potential hazards, and ensures
that all health and safety requirements are met.
· Provides a copy of this SHSP to each member of the project field team.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
1
1
California Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Health and Safety Officer
The ESE 'Site Health and Safety Officer (SHSO) for this investigation is also Mr. Mark
Magargee. He advises the PM on all aspects of health and safety on-site and
recommends stopping work if any operation threatens worker or public safety.
Other duties inchide:
'- Implement the SHSP.
· Select personal protective clothing and equipment specific for the project
and ensures that they are properly stored and maintained.
· Assure that all personnel assigned to site have appropriate health and
safety training and have a current baseline medical examination.
· Assign key safety duties and responsibilities to team members.
· Monitor the work parties for signs of stress, and also monitors on-site
hazards and conditions.
· Know emergency procedures, evacuation routes, arranges on-site first aid
facilities and off-site emergency care.
· Conduct daily safety meetings and periodic inspections to determine if SI-ISP
is being followed.
· Establish and maintain site record keeping, including reporting accidents,
as required.
· Participate in preparation of SHSP and revise it as necessary.
· Verify that drilling or ex'eavation locations have been cleared for
underground utilities and other . subsurface structures before subsurface
exploration is initiated.
Team Members
The responsibilities for the team members are as follows:
· Take all reasonable precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to
their fellow employees; and
· Performing only those tasks that they believe they can do safely, and
immediately reporting any accidents and/or unsafe conditions to the client
and the CHSO.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
1
I
California Water Service
7
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Implementing the procedures set forth in the SHSP, and reporting any
deviations from the procedures described in the Plan to the SHSO and to the
CHSO.
SITE INFORMATION
All field activities will take place on the California Water Service Company property.
All drilling activities will take place in the daylight hours between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00
P.M.
The presence and location of hazardous materials, which are hydrocarbon
compounds, has been confirmed through previous investigations. If needed, three
blasts of a horn will be sounded for site evacuation. This site information is current
and has been verified through analytical testing.
HAZARD ASSESSMENT
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials may be a health hazard to site personnel via ingestion, skin
absorption, or inhalation. Biohazards or accidental ingestion of contaminants may
occur via hand-to-mouth actions. Dust inhalation may also contribute to ingestion of
chemical contaminants. During excavation, soil sample collection, and sample
~preparation, inhalation of contaminant vapors could occur. Skin absorption may
occur via contact with contaminated soil and/or ground water. The degree of hazard
depends upon the adverse characteristics and toxicity of the chemical contamination,
the amount of potential contact, and the exposure time. The greatest potential for
chemical hazard to site personnel is during excavation activities.
The following substance is potentially a chemical hazard at the subject site:
Substances Involved
Hydrocarbon Fuels
PhYsical State
Liquid/Absorbed
C..haracteristics
Irritant
The following materials potentially present at this project site are sPecified by
California Health and Safety Code 25249.5 as recognized and confirmed by the State of
California as carcinogenic and/or mutagenic:
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
CalifOrnia Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Gasoline fuel containing benzene.
Potential Worker Hazards
With hydrocarbon-based liquids, contact may result in dermal irritation due to
desiccation. Respiration of air laden with hydrocarbon vapors may result in oxygen
deficiency and/or mucous membrane irritation. Mixtures of air and hydrocarbon
fuels exhibit an explosive range thus presenting an explosion hazard. Gasoline fuel
may contain significant amounts of benzene, a proven human carcinogen. Potential
eXposure values and limits for benzene are listed in the table below.
TABLE 1 - pOTENTIAL EXPOSURE VALUES
Chemical Highest Cone. IP 1 TLV2 IDLH3 Flammable
Detected in (electron (pPm) Level Range
Samples (ppm) volts) ,,, (percent)
Benzene 6.0 0.9245 10 Carcinogen 1.3 - 7.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lionization Potential in electron Volts (eV)
2Threshold Limit Value as the time-weighted average (TWA) published by the American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
31mraediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) level 'as published by National Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Publication Number 85-114, September 1985.
NA: not available
Benzene is a colorless liquid with an aromatic odor. It is incompatible with strong
oxidizers like chlorine or bromine with iron. The routes of exposure for benzene
include inhalation, skin absorption, inge'stion,, and skin and/or eye contact.
Symptoms of exposure to benzene include irritation to the eyes, nose, and re'spiratory
system, giddiness, headache, nausea, staggering gait, fatigue, anorexia, lassitude,
dermatitis, and abdominal pain.
The potential health hazard from benzene exposure is moderate at this site.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
CalifOrnia Water Service
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conditions for Suspension of Operations
Site monitoring equipment will include a Photo-ionization detector (PID) or a Flame-
ionization detector (FID) during drilling and trenching. Field activities at Level D
will be suspended when the continuous FID or PID level in the breathing zone
increases to ten times background levels (assuming an ambient range of five to ten
ppm).
Level of Protection
The level of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) needed for this investigation is
Level D. Level D PPE includes coveralls, leather boots with steel toes and shanks, eye
protection, safety helmet and gloves. If warranted, this Site Safety .Plan can be
modified for use of Level C situations. Modification to Level B or Level A is beyond
the scope for this Site Safety Plan and is not permitted.
The criteria for upgrading to Level C PPE is the detection of unknown gasses or
vapors in concentrations greater than 10 times background levels or unknown
liquids present within the work areal Level C PPE includes Tyvek suits, nitrile gloves
and rubber boots, eye protection, hard hat, and a full-face air-purifying respirator
with Scott 642-OA-H cartridge-filters or equivalent.
Physical Hazards
Drilling equipment will be working near buildings and overhead phone lines.
Proper precautions required when working around an operating drill rig will be
strictly adhered to. All workers will be positioned upwind from drilling equipment at
all times.
Slips, Trips. and Falls
All field personnel shall become familiar with the general terrain and potential
physical hazards (ravines, potholes, and loose gravel) which would be associated with
accidental risk to slips, trips and/or falls.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
10
February 24, 1992
Splashes and Spills
All field personnel shall 'wear appropriate chemical resistant .gloves and goggles to
prevent potential dermal exposure to accident splashes and spills that may occur
during excavation of contaminated soil and soil sampling.
Sunburn
Working outdoors on sunny daYs for extended periods of time can cause sunburn to
the skin. Excessive exposure to sunlight is associated with the development of skin
cancer. Field staff should take precautions to prevent sunburn by using sun-screen
lotion and/or wearing hats and long-sleeved garments.
Heat Stress
Heat Stress can be a major hazard, especially for workers donning personnel
protective equipment (PPE). The same protective materials that shield the body from
chemical exposure also limit the dissipation of body heat and moisture. Heat stress
can occur very quickly, depending on the work being performed, the ambient
weather conditions, clothing, and the individual characteristics of the worker.
Because heat stress is probably one of the most common (and potentially serious)
illness at hazardous waste sites, regular monitoring and other preventive
precautions are vital.
Heat stress monitoring should commence when personnel are wearing PPE,
including Tyvek-type coveralls, and the ambient temperature exceeds 70°F. · If
impermeable garments are not worn, monitoring should start when the temperature
reaches 85°F. The following monitoring program is for workers wearing
semipermeable or impermeable encapsulating ensembles when the temperature in
the work area is above 70°F:
Heart Rate should be measured .by the radial pulse during a 30 second period as
early as possible in the rest period. The next work cycle should be shortened
by one:third while the rest period is kept the same, if the heart rate exceeds
110 beats per minute. If the heart rate still exceeds 110 beats per minute at the
beginning of the next rest period, shorten the following work cycle by one-
third.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
,i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
11
February 24, 1992
Preventing heat stress is particularly important because once someone suffers from
heat stroke or heat exhaustion, that person may be predisposed to additional heat
injuries. To avoid heat stress, the following steps may be taken:
Modify work/rest schedules according to monitoring . requirements, and
mandate slowdowns as needed.
· Alternate personnel assigned to particular tasks to minimize over stress at
one job function.
· Add additional persons to work team, and work during cooler hours, .if
possible.
· Provide shelter or shaded areas to protect personnel during rest periods.
· Maintain workers body fluids to ensure that the cardiovascular system
functions adequately by having workers drink 16 ounces of fluid
(preferably water) before beginning work, and urge workers to drink at
least 16 ounces of fluid during each rest. period.
· Encourage workers to maintain an optimal level of physical fitness.
An initial work/rest cycle on one hour work and fifteen minutes rest is
recommended for protection of staff when the heat stress hazard is high. The
recommended cycle will be adjusted up or down based upon worker monitoring,
environmental conditions, and the judgement of the site Safety officer. At any time
field team members recognize the signs or symptoms of heat stress prior to a
scheduled rest period, they will notify the site safety officer immediately in order
that a rest period can be called.
Some of the signs and symptoms of heat stress are heat rash, heat cramps, heat
exhaustion, and heat stroke. Heat rash is characterized by a decreasing ability to
tolerate heat and skin irritation and may result from exposure to heat or humid air.
Skin cleanliness and treatment with mild drying lotions are necessary to prevent
infection. Heat cramps are caused by heavy sweating with inadequate electrolyte
replacement and are characterized by muscle spasms and pain in the hands, feet, and
abdomen. Treatment of this disability consists of administering salted liquids orally.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California Water Service
12
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Heat exhaustion may result 'form physical exertion in a hot environment when
cardiac output is inadequate to meet increased flow of blood that results from dilation
of peripheral blood vessels or dehydration. It is distinguished by pale, cool, moist
skin, heavy sweating, dizziness, nausea, and fainting. First aid for heat exhaustion is
as follOws:
Immediately remove victim to support area, or if you are the victim,
proceed to the support area.
2. Decontaminate, if practical, before entering support area.
3. Start cooling, but be careful not to cause a chill.
4. If conscious and not in shock, give water to drink slowly.
If vomiting, and/or signs and symptoms are not lessening within an
hour, call for emergency help and/or transport victim to emergency
room.
o
If person is a victim of heat exhaustion, they should not work the
remainder of the day.
The most serious form of heat stress is heat stroke. This is caused when the
temperature regulation fails and the body temperature rises to critical levels.
Immediate action must be taken to cool the body before serious injury and death
occur. Red, hot, usually dry skin, lack of reduced perspiration, nausea, dizziness and
confusion, strong, rapid pulse, and coma are the signs and symptoms of heat stroke.
First aid for heat stroke is as follows:
1. Immediately move victim to cool, uncontaminated area, the support area,
and remove and dispose of victim's chemical-resistant clothing, if
wearing any.
2. Cool the victim rapidly using whatever means necessary. This can
include, but may not be limited to, removing clothing, fanning, and
placing in water.
3. Do not give drinking water to victim.
4. Treat for shock, if needed.
5. Transport the victim to a medical facility immediately for further cooling
and monitoring of body functions.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California Water Service
13
February 24, 1992
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
Cold Stress
Cold stress is a particular concern when field activities are performed~ while the air
temperatures at the site are below 40°F. If winds are blowing at 5 mph or grater
and/or the weather is damp or wet, cold stress, is even more of a potential hazard.
Donning of appropriate clothing, having warm shelter readily available, carefully
scheduling work and rest periods, and monitoring workers' Physical conditions are
precautions that will be taken to prevent cold stress.
Cold injury (frostbite and hypothermia) may occur if cold stress is not prevented. As
a preventive measure, the body core temperature must not drop below 96.8°F. Pain in
the extremities is the first early sign of cold stress. Severe shivering sets in when
the body core temperature drops below 95°F. If this occurs, work will stop
immediately and the affected worker(s) will take a warming break of sufficient
duration that the signs and symptoms of cold stress go away.
Noise
Heavy equipment, such as excavators, may produce loud noise. The effects of noise
can include, but may not be limited to:
· Distracted, annoyed, or startled workers.
· Physical damage to the ear, pain, and temporary and./or permanent
hearing loss.
· Communication interference that may increase potential hazards due to
the inability to warn of dangers and the proper safety precautions to be
taken.
OSHA regulation 29 CFR Part 1910.95 describes an effective hearing conservation
program that must be administered whenever noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-
hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA (decibels on the 'A-weighted
scale). In addition, if workers are subjected to noise exceeding an 8-hOur, time-
weighted average sound level of 90 dBA, feasible administrative or engineering
controls must be utilized.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
1
I
California Water Service
14
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
!
I
I
!
i
I
I
Heavy Equipment and Drilling
'Before beginning any site work, the drilling subcontractor will perform a safety
inspection of the drilling equipment. Personnel shall not work with equipment that
they judge to be unsafe because of deterioration, missing parts, obvious defects, or
improper use for site conditions. All equipment shall be bonded and grounded,
sparkproof, and explosion-resistant, as appropriate.
ANSI-approved hardhats must be worn at and near the drill rig or any other heavy
equipment. Since heavy, pieces of equipment will be used during drilling, steel-toed
boots/shoes are required "during drilling operations, as well as during operation of
other heavy equipment.
The driller must maintain a safe clearance .(at least 10 feet) between overhead utility
lines and the drill rig at all times.
Underground Utilities..
The general engineering contractor will locate all underground utility locations
prior to the starting of drilling activities. Resources .used include site plans, utility
companies, and Underground Services Alert (USA). In California, USA must be
contacted at least two, but not more than fourteen, days prior to drilling on public
property.
MEDICAL MONITORING
All Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. (ESE) employees assigned to the sampling
operations must be active participants in ESE Employee Medical Surveillance
Program, which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120. ESE's program requires
employees assigned to hazardous waste site investigations and remediation to take
pre-assignment, annual, and exit medical examinations. The CHSO will maintain
current copies of 'training certificates and statements of medical program
participation for all site personnel.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California Water Service
1'5
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Work-Rest Schedule
Depending on the prevailing temperature and humidity, a work-rest schedule may be
necessary. Duration and frequency will be at the discretion of the excavator and/or
site supervisor. A supply of potable water will be kept available near the site.
Safety Training
Field personnel 'must receive 40-hour basic health and safety training, designed to
comply With the OSHA/EPA requirements for hazardous waste operations and eight
hours of annual refresher as set forth in 29 CFR i910. I20, and attend a site-specific
safety orientation conducted by the project supervisor. The briefing shall include
the following:'
1)
· 2)
A briefing on the work to be performed and the work schedule
A discussion of .the potential chemical and physical hazards associated with
the work to be performed
3) Hazard identification
4) Purpose and limitations of personal protective equipment
5) Decontamination and ' emergency response procedures
6) Proper on-site condUct.
EMERGENCY CONTACT AND PROCEDURES
Contac.ts
Should any situation or unplanned occurrence require outside or support services,
the appropriate contact from the following should be made:
Agency Person to C0ntaet
Ambulance .dispatcher
Kern County Fire Department dispatcher
Police dispatcher
Hazardous Materials Division Joe Dunwoody
Mercy Medical Center dispatcher
Telephone
911
9'11
911
(805) 326-3911
(805)328-5275
To reach Mercy Medical Center, take South H Street south one block to White lane and
turn right. Take White Lane west one mile to Freeway 99 and turn north on Freeway
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
California Water Service
16
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
99. Take Freeway 99 north five miles to California Avenue Exit and exit right.
Proceed east on California 'Avenue one block to Oak Street, and turn left. Proceed
north on Oak Street over train bridge one half mile to Truxtun Avenue and turn
right. Proceed east on Truxtun Avenue one mile following the signs to the
emergency entrance of the hospital which will be on the right (south side of Truxtun
Avenue ) at 2215 Truxtun Avenue in Bakersfield.
Paramedics should be summoned in the event of a serious injury; they will arrange to
transport the victim to the nearest appropriate facility. A first aid kit will be
available at the site for use in case of minor injuries. If anyone receives a splash or
particle in the eye, the portable eyewash will be used to irrigate the eye for 15
minutes. If direct contact with contaminants occurs, affected skin areas should be
washed immediately with soap and water.
At least one person at the site will have current certification in .First Aid and CPR.
SITE LAYOUT
The level of hazard associated with the work to be performed does not require
dividing the site into formal exclusion, contamination reduction, and support zones.
However, care will be taken to avoid breathing vaporized gasoline fuel.
CONTAMINATION MONITORING
Organic vapor monitoring of the ambient air shall be conducted at reasonable
intervals as determined by project personnel. The purpose of monitoring is to
determine if vapor levels in the work area are high enough to warrant personal
protection measures or evacuation of the site.
Organic vapor levels should be monitored using an OVM photoionization meter with
an 11.7 eV lamp (probe), calibrated to benzene or a FoXboro® OVA (organic vapor
analyzer) 108 flame-ionization detector calibrated for non-methane hydrocarbons.
Background should be determined by taking readings before sampling begins. All
readings, background and others, must be recorded. If any continuous measurement
is observed to 'be 10 times over background levels in the work area, respiratory
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water Service
17
February' 24, 1992
protective action will be required.
geologists or engineers discretion.
Lesser protective measures are at the field
DECONTAMINATION
Before leaving the site/work area, personnel must remove all protective equipment
and wash their hands, faces and necks. These washing procedures shall be observed
before-all work breaks.
To minimize the potential for cross-contamination, all excavation equipment shall be
decontaminated before the start of drilling, between borings, and before removal
from the site. Sampling equipment shall be decontaminated before sampling and
between sampling with washing with laboratory-grade detergent, a water rinse and
a contaminant-free distilled water rinse.
EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
Emergency conditions are considered to exist if:
Any member of the field crew is involved in an accident, experiences any
adverse effects or symptoms of exposure while on-site; or
A condition is discovered that suggests the existence of a situation more
hazardous than anticipated.
In the event of an on-site emergency, the procedures described below are to be
immediately followed.
Personnel on-site should use the "buddy system" (stay in pairs). In the event of
a communication breakdown, i.e. radio malfunction or if radios are not
available, "buddies" should use prearranged hand signals or other means of
emergency signals as follows:
Hand gripping throat out of air, can't breath.
Grip partner's wrist or place both hands around waist - leave area
immediately, no debate!
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Water service
18
February 24, 1992
Hands on top of head - need assistance
Thumbs down - no, negative.
The field engineer or geologist will establish emergency evacuation routes and
will make all project personnel aware of these routes prior to the first on-site
activities. In the event of an emergency, selection other escape route will be
based on the nature of the emergency and wind direction.
o
Visual contact should be maintained between "buddies" on-site, with the team
remaining in close proximity in order to assist~ each other in case of
emergencies.
In the' event that any member of the field crew experiences any adverse effects
of symptoms of exposure while on site, the entire field crew should immediately
halt work' and follow the instructions provided the project supervisor.
Wind indicators visible to all on-site personnel should be provided by the
project supervisor to indicate possible routes for upwind escape.
The discovery of any condition that would suggest the existence of a situation
more hazardous than anticipated should result in the evacuation of the field
team and re-evaluation of the hazard and the level of protectibn required.
In the event an should accident occur, it will be necessary to complete an
Accident Report Form with the company Safety Officer.
STANDARD SAFE-WORK PRACTICES
General
Eating, drinking, chewing tobacco and smoking are prohibited in the
contaminated or potentially contaminated area of where the possibility for the
transfer of contamination exists.
Avoid contact with potentially contaminated substances. Do not walk through
puddles, pools, mud, etc. Avoid, whenever possible, kneeling on the ground,
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
California Water Service
19
February 24, 1992
leaning or sitting on equipment or ground. Do not place monitoring equipment
on potentially contaminated surfaces (i.e., ground, etc.).
All field crew members should be alert to the presence of strong, irritating or
nauseating odors that could indicate a potentially dangerous situation. Other
senses should be kept alert to possible hazards as well.
Precaution should be taken to prevent spillage.
occur, the liquid should be contained.
In the event a spillage should
Prevent splashing of the contaminated liquids.
Field crew members shall be familiar with the physical characteristics of
investigations, inclUding the following:
Wind direction in relation to ground-zero area.
Accessibility to associates, equipment, and vehicles.
Communications.
Hot Zone (areas of known or suspected contamination).
Site access.
Nearest water sources.
The number of personnel and equipment in the contaminated area should be
minimized but only to the extent consistent with work-force requirements of
safe site operations.
All wastes generated during Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. and/or
subcontractor activities at the site remain the property of the client.
EB-8132-1
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California Water Service
21
February 24, t992
I
I
I
The undersigned have read and understood the attached safety' plan and agree to
comply with the provisions of this plan.
i
Name Date Name Date
I
I
Position Position
Name Date Name Date
I
Position Position
1
I
Name Date Name Date
I
Position Position
I
Name Date Name Date
I
I
Position Position
Name Date Name Date
I
I
I
I
Position
EB-8132-1
Position
9202-E057.WP
I
I
California. Water Service
20
February 24, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
PLAN ACCEPTANCE FORM
The Plan Acceptance Form (attached) should be filled out by all employees working
on the site and retained in the job file.
Corporate Health & Safety Officer Robert Mohle (805) 541-5983
Site Safety Officer
Mark Magargee (805) 836-0901 office
(805) 872-2496 - home
Project-Site Safety Plan prepared b~y Mark Magargee in conjunction with the
Corporate Health & Safety Officer.
Signature: ~~~ Date:
EB ~ 8132-1
9202-E057.WP
FIRE DEPARTMENT
S. D. JOHNSON
FIRE CHIEF
CITY of BAKERSFIELD
January 31, 1992
2101 I'~ STREET
BAKERSFIELD, 93301
326-3911
Ed Wegemer
California Water Service
3725 S. H Street
Bakersfield, CA 93304
RE:
Laboratory results from limited site assessment
conducted at the California Water Service facility, 3725
S. H Street Bakersfield, CA. (Dispenser)
Dear M~. Wegemer,
Upon review of the recently Submitted laboratory results from the
soil samples collected beneath the location previously occupied by
the fuel dispenser at your facility, this office has determined
that the extent of the contamination plume has not been adequately
defined.
This office requires (in accordance with chapter 6.7 of the
California Health and Safety Code and chaPter 16, Title. 23 of the
California Code Of. Regulations) that further assessment be done to
define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination
plume.
Please submit a work plan fOr further assessment, to this office,
with in 30 days from receipt of this letter. The work plan should
follow guidelines found in: Appendix A - Reports, Tri - Reqional
Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and
Investigation of Underqround Tank Sites; January 22, 1991.
'If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979.
//Joe At Dunwoody
// Hazardous Material Specialist
Underground Tank Program
December 9, 1991
Mr. Joe Dunwoody
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD - FIRE DEPARTMENT
2130 "G" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
REGARDING:
Underground Fuel Tank Removal Project at 3725 South "H" Street,
Bakersfield, California, (Tank Removal Permit Number BRO019), KES
Project Number E-706
Dear Mr. DUnwoody:
Enclosed please find analytical results (BC Laboratory Sample Numbers 12335-1
through 12335-6) and chain, of custody record for the above referenced project.
Also attached is a copy. of Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest Number 91634121,
a copy of the Tank Destruction Form (the original is to be mailed to you by Golden State
Metals, Inc., Bakersfield, California) and a copy of the Non Hazardous Waste Manifest No.
103068.
Sincerely,
C~IGJL/oRNETT, Lead Technician
DCC:b'd
Enclosures
· Post Office Box 5337, Bakersfield, California 93388 · (805) 589.5220
In California ' · (800) 332-5376
ENVIRONMEt~TAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 3274911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
P 0 BOX 5337
B/kKERSFIELD, CA 93388
Attn.: CRAIG CORNETT 589-5220
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-1,
CRAIG CORNETT
Date of
Report: 11'/25/91
Lab ~: 12335=1
SOIL @ 2', 11-15-91 SAi~PLE COLLECTED BY
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents'by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/91
Constituents
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
11/15/9~
Date Analysis
Completed:
11/22/91
Analysis Reporting
Results Units
Benzene None Detected mg/k9
Toluene None Detected mg/kg
Ethyl Benzene NOne Detected mg/kg
o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg
m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg
p-Xytene None Detected mg/kg
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg
Minimum
Reporting
Level
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
1.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KEP~N ENVIROR-MENTAL SERVICES
P O BOX 5337
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93388
Attn.: CRAIG COR_NETT 589-5220
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-2,
CRAIG COP~NETT
Date of
Report: 11/25/91
Lab ~: 12335-2
SOIL,@ 6', 11-15-91 S~PLE COLLECTED BY
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L~U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/91
Constituents
Date Sample
Received ® Lab:
11/15/91
Date Analysis
Completed:
11/22/91
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Results Units Level
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
p-XYlene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
£NV/RONM£kTAL
CHEI~ICAL ANALYSIS
I~£TRO~£UM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327~1911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
P O BOX 5337
B/LKERSFIELD, CA 93388
Attn.: CRAIG CORNETT 589-5220
Date of
Report: 1t/25/91
Lab ~: 12335-3
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-3, SOIL ® 2', 11-15-91 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY
CRAIG CORNETT
TEST ~IETHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/91
Constituents
Date Sample
Received ® Lab:
11/15/91
Date Analysis
Completed:
11/22/91
Analysis Reporting
Results Units
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene None Detected~ mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S' Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327~1911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KERN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
P 0 BOX 5337
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93388
Attn.: CRAIG CORNETT 589-5220
Date of
Report: 11/25/91
Lab #: 12335-4
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-'4, SOIL ® 6' , 11-15-91 SAI~PLE COLLECTED BY
CRAIG CORNETT
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/9~
Date Sample
Received ® Lab:
1i/15/91
Date Analysis
ComPleted:
11/22/91
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
o-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
m-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
p-Xylene None Detected mg/kg 0.005
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg 1.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S..Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
ENVIRONME~ITAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327~1911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KERN ENVIROITMENTAL SERVICES
P 0 BOX 5337
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93388
Attn.: CRAIG CORNETT 589-5220
Date of
Report: 11/25/91
Lab ~: 12335-5
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-5, SOIL @ 2', 11-15-91 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY
CRAIG CORNETT
TEST METHOD: TPH by'D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/91
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
11/15/91
Date Analysis
Completed:
11/22/91
Analysis Reportin9
Constituents Results Units
Benzene 6
Toluene 98
Ethyl Benzene 22
o-Xylene 62
m-Xylene 83
p-Xylene 36
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) 1300.
Minimum
Reporting
Level
mg/kg 1.
mg/kg 1.
mg/kg 1.
mg/kg 1.
mg/kg 1.
mg/k9 1.
mg/kg 200.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert.
Department Supervisor
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROL£UM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 ATLAS CT., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE (805) 327-4911 FAX (805) 327-1918
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
KERN ENVIRON-MENTAL SERVICES Date of
P 0 BOX 5337 Report: 11/26/91
B~IKERSFIELD, CA 93388 Lab ~: 12335-6
Attn.: CRAIG CORNETT 589-5220
Sample Description: E-706 CALIF. WATER: CW-6, SOIL @ 6', 11-15-91 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY
CRAIG CORNETT
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
11/15/91
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
111~5/91
Date Analysis
Completed:
11/25/91
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Constituents Results Units Level
Benzene None Detected mg/kg 1
Toluene 24. mg/kg 1
Ethyl Benzene 11. mg/kg 1
o-Xylene 31. mg/kg 1
m-Xylene 46. mg/kg 1
p-Xylene 20. mg/kg
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas) 1200. mg/kg 200.
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186
Department Supervisor
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
KERN ENVIRONMENTAL SF_.RV/CE
Post O(fice Box 5337
~akersfield, California 93388
¢805)~8S-5220
In Cali[omia (800)332-537'6
· S~.o~c~o~o--~dW*~"~ . See Ir~tructio~s on back o~ page 6.
C~0~A ~ATgR S~V~Cg CO~
IN CASE OF ~RGENCY CONTACT C~IG CO.IT OF ~S AT ,(800)332-5376
T
E
A
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS UNE.
Well, Tank No.
Field or Area
P.O. BOX 5295 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93388
(805) 589-5220
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER RECORD
TO BE USED FOR NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES ONLY
N°'
103068
' I~ ~ ~' '~ Complete}
~ ~ '~:'~;~ ~" ?q,?' ~'~ ~"1 (Generator Must
Name C~/---/,,c ¢~',~'~'/V'l,~ k,,,~/. ?'~-~ ~/¢
Field Address ~ ~ ~"
~. ~:' City~ State, Zip ~,~l~ ~
'~:~. ,~?; ..Order Placed By ~ ~~ ~
';:~ .~.~;: S~gnature then t
WASTE TO BE DISPOSED
EType /./,/VD ~X'~,/~'o
Generating Location
Special Handling Instructions:
[] Gloves [] Goggles
Quantity /--
[] Other
DESIGNATED FACILITY
Name (~ ~/- 0 ~'/~/.~-?-/}'F~' ////~----7'~
Address ~ ~ O ~'. z~g~/'~'~,~
City, State, Zip .~',~-/,'/'~--f/5',/::::/~6/:)
Bbls.
Phone
(Hauler Must Complete)
Name .
Address ~1'."O, .,~ ~ X -~'$3 7
City, State, Zip ,~,,~ Jf~-",~"..~'.~'/_¢:::'~,.,~) ~,¢~
Phone ~
Ticket Cf Unit No. ~' / / ~
[] AM
Pick Up Date //-//_4~"-.~/ Time / Z: y(~ ,~M
NOTE: This form to be used in lieu of the California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Waste Manifest for NON-HAZARDOUS wastes only.
REMARKS:
Quantity Received / Bbls. Date
[] AM
Time /; D~ ~
'fill.!:Phone ~ '~"~' ~'~'- c~ / Disp. Ticket Cf
,:. :!):':
['L~ ~ FORM K~-T-20
Date
'GENERATOR COPY
DISPOSAL METHOD:
[] Landfill [] Other
Return Copy To: GENERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
NOTE: It is not necessary to send copy to Dept. of Health Services.
NO HAZARDOUS FEES SHOULD BE LEVIED
[] Surface Impoundment [] Injection
5~90
GOLDEN STATE METALS, INC.
P. O. Box 70158 · 2000 E. Brundage Lane
Bakersfield, California 93387
Phone (805) 327-3559 · Fax (805) 327-5749
Scrap Metals, Processing & Recycling
JOB SITE:
DESTINATION:
N° 10151
TANK DISPOSAL FORM
Contractor's
License No.
Contractor's
Phone No.
G.S.M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGELANE · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387
'?EIGHT CERT. NO=..L-~'~)
EHSD PERMIT NO:
COUNTY:
I~ TANK INSPECTION
[~EAN & DRY (AccEPT), OR
r'-~ RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT)
LEL READING
~) OXYGEN CONTENT
DISPOSAL FEE
~SCRAPVALUE
OTHER
All fees incurred are per load unless specified. Terms are
net 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature
represents acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms
that tank removal complies with State laws.
CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE
I LICENSE N O :~//~¢/,~
' ' ' 'TOTAL
QTY GALLONS SERIAL NO. NET TONS
250 .14
550 .24
1000 - 6 ft .61
2000 .97
3OOO 1.32
5000 2.42
7500 3,28
9000 3.82
12000 4.93
TOTAL
' CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL ! DESTRUCTION
THIS~O CERTIFY THE RECK ~PT~ND ACCEPTANC~E_D~THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIED WILL BE COMPLETELY
J:::)ES~R0~YED FO-~SCRAP'REi ¢CLI~IG PURPOSF~ONLY?~
~' '*-~','~ , . ..< ...... A~T ORIZEDREP.',,'~'- ...."~..: ~?.., .' .... . -* ,-,: .- ':. ?.: ~ ..,.,., ".,,,,,:. · ..: ....... '.,:,'~
. , .;: ._' · ~....~,:?:.;:*:%. ~.: ~ , =C .,,., . ..:..W~TE ...... ~ Con.actor Copy' · YELLO~'~ ~le Copy PINK ~ ~rma~nt Copy ..,
:~,~....:. :.:..,'.:.~:, ,.:". .... :..:..:,,~.~;: :,..~-.:.:....,.,:~. ,,......:... ..... ... ...... :.: ......... ....-.: .. ::.: :~, :.,-.-: · .... -_,...:~....... ..... -.. ......-.. _
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
EMERGENCY
m~ NAME '~~ .~F ~IDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT ~)t ~J'~::~, I (~..) ,.~ ,~_..~. ,~ ,..~ PHONE SIGNAmR~
REPRESENTING ~ OWNE~PE~TOR ~ REG~N~BOARD I ~MPANY OR AGENCY NAME
~ ADDRESS
~ ADDRESS
~RE~ C~ STA~ ~IP
FACILI~ N~E (IF ~PLICABL~ OPE~TOR ~ PHONE
~ ~ct.~~ '~c~ ~C~.' ~A~O ,I ( )
~ ~RE~ C~ ~ ZIP
~ CRO~ STREET
~ L~AL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NT~T PERSON ~ PHONE
~ ~ RE~N~OARD PNON~
· ~i~ ~ UNKNOWN
m ~ UNKNOWN
~E DA~ DI~VERED ~ HOW DIS~VERED ~ INVENTORY ~NTR~ ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ~ NUIS~CE CONDITIONS
~ HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED ?_ ~YES ~ NO IF YES. DA~ /M, t M, ' / D'~ ~YI ~ Y:I ~ REPAIRTANKREP~CE TANK ~ CLOSE TANK& FILL IN P~CE ~ CHANGE PR~EDURE~ OTHER
~o~.c~ o~ =,~.~ c~us~s,
~ ~ CHECK ONE ONLY
"g ~ ~ UNDmRMINED ~ SOIL ONLY ~ GROUNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER- (CHECK ONLY. IF WATER WELLS .A~ ACtuarY aEEN AFFEC~D
CHECK ONE ONLY
~ ~ ~ NO AC~oN TArN ~ PR~IMINARY S~ A~E~MENT ~RKP~N SUBMI~ED ~ POLLUTION C~C~RI~TION
~ ~ LE~BE~NFIRMED ~ PR~IMINARYS~ESSMENTUNDERWAY ~ P~TCLE~UPMONI~ORINGINPROGRE~
~ REMEDIAT~N P~N ~ CASE CLUED (CLE~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ CLE~UP UNDERWAY
CHECK
APPROPR~TE
ACTION(S)
~ EXCAVA~ & DISUSE (ED) ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEGRADATION (1~
~ C~ SI~ (CD) ~ EXCAVA~ & TREAT (E~ ~ PUMP & TREAT GROUNDWA~R (G~ ~ RE,CE SUPPLY (RS)
~ ~ ~NTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ ~ ACT~N REQUIRED (NA)
~ VACUUM EXT~CT ~ ~ OTHER (O~
8
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK)7"CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
EMERGENCY
REPORT BEEN FILED ?
~ REPRESENTING, ~ OWNE~PE~TOR ~ REGION~ BOARD [ ~MPA~ OR ~EN~ NAME~ ~', ~' .
~RE~ C~ STA~
FACILI~ N~E (IF APPEICABL~ OPE~TOR ~ PHONE
~ REG~N~ BOARD ~ PHONE '
~o (1) NAME · · QUANTI~LOST(~LLONS)
-, ~ ~ UNKNOWN
' ' HOW DIS~VERED ~. INV~TORY ~NTR~ ~ SU~URFACE MONIToRI~ . ~ NUIS~CE CONDITIONS
I t Gl TANK~sT ,~- TANK REMOVAL ~ OTHER
~ DA~ DIVERGE BE~N M~HOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ~L ~AT. APPLY)
~ m SOURCE OF DIVERGE CAUSE(S) - .J~ ,- ,~
O ~ ' -~.~
~ ~ ~ TANK mAK. ~ UNK~N' ~ OVERFILL ~ RUP~R~AILuRE ~ SPILL
~ ~ CHECK ONE ONLY '
O ~ '~ UNDERMINED ~ SOIL ONLY :~ GROUNDWATER ~. DRI~KING WATER',: (CHECK ONLY iF WATER WELLS HA~ AC~ALW BEEN AFFEC~D)
CHECK ONE ONLY
'~ NO ACTION TA~N' '~ PR~IMINARYS~A~E~MENT~RKP~NSUBMI~ED ~ PO~LUTIONC~R~TION
~ ~ LE~ BEI~ ~NFIRMED ~ PR~IMINARY SI~ ~E~M~T UN~RWAY ~ P~T CLE~UP MONITORING IN PROGRE~
,'~ REMEDIA~ON P~N ~ CASE CL~ED ~E~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ OLD'UP UNDERWAY, '
CHECK APPROPR~TE ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVA~ & DISUSE (ED). ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~cED BIO DEG~DATION (1~
~ ~ ~. CAP SI~ (CD) ' . ~ EXCAVATE &'TREAT ~E~ ~ PUMP &'TREAT GROUNDWAmR (G~ ~ REPACK SUPPLY (RS)
~ O ~ ~NTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ NO ACT~N REQUIRED (HA) ~ TREA~E~ AT H~P (HU) ~ vENT ~IL ~S)
~ V~UUM EXT~CT ~ ~ OTHER (0~ '
~ ·
'~'~--" ~'IAZARDOUS MATERI..ALS DIg/SION
· 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 ·
(805) 326-3970 ·
R
//
.. 'k~ ' UNDERGROUND TANK QUE~S-TIONN-~.IRE
CITY NAME
~' BOX TO INDICATE
SEP 0 5 1991
HAT, M_AT. DIV.
PARCEL No.(OPTIONAL)
~[CORPORATtON [~INDIVIDUAL ~PARTNERSHIP [~ LOCAL AGENCY DISTRICTS [~COUNIYAGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY [~ FEDERAL AGENCY
TYPE OF BUSINESS
GAS STATION
[~3 FARM
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY)
DAYS: NAME (LAS~', FIRS1) PHONE No. WITH AREA CODE
NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE No. WITH AREA CODE
DISTRIBUTOR KERN COUNTY PERMIT
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDAR~ optional
DAYS: NAME (~ST, FI~ PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE
NIGHTS: NAME (~. FI~ PHONE ~. WITH AE~ CODE
~ ~ 705- ~27-~1LI
II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME ~&
MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS
~.o, ~,ox ttSo
CITY NAME
CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION
~' BOX [~INDIVIDUAL ' [~LOCAL AGENCY ' ~STATE AGENCY
TO INDICATE ~ PA...RTNERSHIP , ~ COUNTY AGENCY ~ FEDERAL AGENCY
ZiP CODE PHONE No, WITH AREA CODE
III. TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION
MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS
%?xs Sou'%,,"
CITY NAME
~' BOX [~ INDIVIDUAL [~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY
TO INDICATE ~ PARTNERSHIP , [~ COUNTY AGENCY {~ FEDERAL AGENCY
STATE ZiP CODE ~ PHONE No, WITH AREA CODE
OWNER'S DATE
TANK No. (.~:,o,) INSTALLED
VOLUME PRODUCT
STORED
DO YOU HAVE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY? Y/N TYPE
IN
SERVICE
YIN
¥/N
Y/N
Y/N
'~ ~ill one segment out for each tank, unless al~m~tanks and piping are
~ constructed of ti~same materials, style Snipe, then only fill
one 'segment out.Vi)lease identify tanks by o~-ner ID #.
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY iF UNKNOWN
A. OWNER'S TANK LD.# '~".~ l'e.\(:~ O-.~,c~.~Ce. I B. MANUFACTURED BY: I~ ~'%,t,~ VtO~.jU,
C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) ~ ~'{ t D, TANK CAPAC TY.IN GALLONS:
III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN SOXES A, B. ANDC. ANDALLTHATAPPLIEStNBOXD
A. TYPEOF [] 100UBLE WALL
SYSTEM [~ 2 SINGLE WALL
] 3 SINGLE WALL WiTH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
[] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) r-I. 99 OTHER
B. TANK
MATERIAL
(Primary Tank)
[] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS
[] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM
[] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN
] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
] 99 OTHER
[] 1 RU~BBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING
c. INTERIOR
UNING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [~ 95 UNKNOWN
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__
] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
.[-~ 99 OTHER
D. CORROSION []. I POLYETHYLENE WRAP ~j~ 2 COATING
PROTECTION ~--~i 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE
=, v,"YL ..... [] ,, F,BERG S RE,NFORCED ST,C
[] ,.,NKNoWN 99 oTHER
IV, PIPING INFORMATION C~RCL~ A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUNO, BOTH IF APPLICABLE '~-
A. SYSTEM TYPE A (~) 1 SUCTION . A U 2 PRESSURE ~ A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A(~ 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUSLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND
CORROSION
PROTE~rION
D. LEAK DETECTION
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
A '4 1 BARE STEEL A '4 2 STAINLESS STEEL A t,I 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORiDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE
A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100"/, METHANOL COMPATIBLEW./FRP
A(~) 9 GAI,.VA['412~ED STEEL .A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
[] I'"~'U'"~'dMA'"'"TI~I~INEI..IE[Ak"D"~ETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING ~ 3 INTERSTITIAL
~ MONITORING [] 99 OTHER
I [] 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
. .~6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING []91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
I. TANK DESCRIPTION · COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # B, MANUFACTURED BY:
C, DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D, TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS:
III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE iTEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANOC, ANDALI~THATAPPLIESINBOXD
A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL
SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL
] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
[] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER
B. TANK [] 1 BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM
(,PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] ~J5 UNKNOWN
[---'] 1 RUBBER LINED ~'~ 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING
C. INTERIOR
LINING [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED .[] 95 UNKNOWN
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL? YES__ NO__
D. CORROSION
PROTECTION
[] 4 STEELCLAD W/F{BERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
[] 8 1009'o METHANOL COMPATIBLJ:W/FRP
[] ~3 OTHER
] 4 PHENOLIC LINING
] 99 OTHER
[] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING
[] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91, NONE
] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
[] UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE .~ IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUNO, BOTH IF APPLICASLE
A. SYSTEMTYPE A U I SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
B. CONSTRUCTION A U 1 SINGLE WALL A U 2 DouBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U gg OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARE STEEL
CORROSION A I.J 5 ALUMINUM
PROTECTION ALI 9 GALVANIZED STEEL
A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A ti 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE
A U 6 CONCRETE A I.J 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100"/o METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIALMoNiTORiNG [] 99 OTHER
· V, TANK LEAK DETECTION
I _.~, 1 VISUAL CHECK
i '] 6 TANK TESTING
[] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [~ 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING I
[] ,NTERST,T,ALMON,TOR NG NON [] UNKNOWN [] OTHER
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SITE INFORMATION
SITE SOuth "H" Street ADDRESS3725 S. H St. ZIP CODE 93304 APN
FACILITY NAME California Water Servicg~ROSS STREET White Lane
TANK OWNER/OPERATOR California Water Service PHONE No. (80~,) 832-2141
MAILING ADDRESS 3725 South "H" Street CITY Bakersfield ZiP CODE 93304
cONTRACTOR INFORMATION
COMPANY Kern Environmental Service PHONE No.
ADDRESS Post Off~ce Box 5337
INSURANCE CARRIER Tolman & Wiker
(805)589-5220 LICENSE No. 432372 C~ass A
CITY ~,~,ld ZIP CODE q~ ·
WORKMEN$ COMP No. - WC-582-21~2
PRELIMANARY ASSEMENT INFORMATION
COMPANY Kern Environmental ServtcEHONE NO.
ADDRESS Post Off~ce Box' 5337
INSURANCE CARRIER Tolman & Wiker'
(805)589-522~ICENSE No. 432372 Class
CITY ~,,.,-~.~.~,~la ZIP CODE 933~
WORKMENS COMP No. WC-582-2132
TANK CLEANING INFORMATION
COMPANY Kern Environmental' Service PHONE No. (805%
ADDRESS Post Office Box 5337 CITY .][ak~:~L~. ZiP CODE
WASTE TRANSPORTERIDENTIFtCATIONNUMBER CAD 982 495 §08
NAME OF RINSTATE DISPOSAL FACILITY Gibson Oil & Ref~n~n~
ADDRESS End of Commercial Drive CiTY B~k~r~f~l~ ZiP CODE 93308
FACILITYINDENTIFICATION NUMBER CAD 980 883 177
TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
COMPANY KVS Transportation Inc, PHONE No. (805~589-5220 LICENSE No. 432372 Class A
ADDRESS Post Office Box ~295 CITY Bakersf~l~ ZIP CODE
TANKDESTiNAT~ON Golden State Metals - 2000 E. BrundaKe Lane, Bakersfield, CA
TANK INFORMATION
TANK NO. AGE VOLUME CHEMICAL
STORED
1 _+ 30 yrs 4,000 gallon Diesel
DATES CHEMICAL
STORED' PREVIOUSLY STORED
1960's to 1990's Diesel
.the AI:::PLICA NT HAS f;EC EIVED. UNDEP,$TA NDS. A ND WILl COMPLY WITH THE A'iTACHE~ CONDIDONS OF THIS P E-f;Mfl' AND ANY
¢-TATE. LOCAL AND FEDERA. L ,qEGULATIONS.
THIS FO~M HAS BEEN CCMPLETED UNDER PENALTY (DF PERJURY. AND TO THE BESJ (DF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS Ti~UE AND
Chris B. geArmon ~.~~//----~~~
APPLICANT NAME (PRINT) URE
THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED
O-rl
`SOUTH ~'H" ,STREET
,?
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION
,~2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM
CONTRACTOR /<' ~ ~
LABORATORY ~
TEST METHODOLOGY ~ 7'~- ~
PRELIMANARY ASSESSMENT Cb
CO2 RECIEPT t-~'~ LEL%
PERMIT TO OPERATE#
' CONTACT PERSON ~
# OF SAMPLES ~
CONTACT PERSON'
02%
PLOT PLAN
CONDITION OF TANKs ~'F"'-'" L"C'///~L/~'7/--
CONDITION OF PIPING
CONDITION OF SOIL
COMMENTS
DATE
INSPECTORS NAME ~/~ SIGNATURE ~/'- ....
BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION
2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 326-3979
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION
name
an authorized agent of
]{~ Cn/~'//~//~(~yT~c &~f~6~ here by 'attest under penalty of
contracting co..
perjury that the tank( s ) located at 3 ~'-~' ~. ~'/~ ,J/2~~ and
address
being removed under permit% 8~00 / 3
has been
cleaned/decontaminated properly and a LEL (lower explosive limit)
reading of no greater than 5% was measured immediately following
the cleaning/decontamination process.
ttl' l /
date
name (print)
signat, ure
MARK ONLY
ONE ITEM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~-~' - ' ' "'~ ~"~'~,
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION. FORM B
COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM.
[~ 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~ERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE
[] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE~ 8 TANK REMOVED
DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED:
I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN
II. TANK CONTENTS IF A-1 IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C.
UNLEADED '[] 4 GASAHOL [] 6 AVIATION GAS
[] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY ~~T [] lbPREMIUM [] 7 METHANOL
' UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL
[] 3 CHEMICAL~RODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW
D. IF (A.1) IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #:
III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD
A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL
] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN
[] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER
B. TANK
STEEL
MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE
(PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE
] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS
[] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE .[~ 7 ALUMINUM
[] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN
] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FPP
] 99 OTHER f
[] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING
C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING ~NED [] 95 UNKNOWN
LINING
IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__
[] 4 PHENOL,~ LINING
] 99 OTHER
D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING
PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION...~NONE
] 3 VINYL WRAP ~ 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC
[] 95 UNKNOWN [] gg OTHER
IV, PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE .&. IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE
A. SYSTEM TYPE
B. CONSTRUCTION
11 SUCTION
SINGLE WALL
A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER
A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A I.I 99 OTHER
C. MATERIAL AND
CORROSION
PROTECTION
D. LEAK DETECTION
AO BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYI.'CHLORIDE(PVC) A U 4 FIBERGLAS'S PiPE
A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP
A I.~ 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER
[] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR ~.~ 2'~LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING []
3
INTERSTITIAL
MONITORING [] 9g OTHER
V. TANK LEAK DETECTION
J6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIALMONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER
VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION _..__.
1. ESTIMATEDDATELASTUSED{MO/DAY/YR) 2. ESTIMATEDQUANTITYOFsuBSTANCE REMAINING . ~'~GALLONS '3. WAS TANK FILLED WITHiNERT MATERIAL ? YES[] NO~
TH/S FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED 'UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NUMBER I~MPOSED OF THE FOUR NUMBERS BELOW
COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # TANK #
PERMIT NUMBER ' PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE I PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE
FORM B (9-90)
THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED.
FOROO34B-R4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION- FORM A
COMPLETE THIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY/SITE
MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERM../T
ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT
] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT
[~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT
] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~ PERMANENTLY CLOSED SITE
] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE
I. FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED)
,,,ORF,,Cy.'NA .E , ~~ ,'- NAME OF OPERATOR
ADDRE~sS ~ ' PARCEL ~ (O~IONAL)
~ BOX
TO INDICATE N ~ iNDiViDUAL ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ COU~Y-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY ~ FEDE~L-AGENCY
DISTRICTS
~PEOFBUS{NESS ~ 1GASSTAT,ON ~ 2DISTRI~UTOR I ~ ~ ,F INDIAN ,~ OF TAN~S AT SiTE , E. F. ~. (. D. ~ (opt,~al)
RESERVATION
~ 3 FARM ~ 4 PROCESSOR~THER ORTRUSTLANDS
I / I
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY). optional
DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST)
PHONE ~ WITF'I~RFA ~('3r3F
NIGHTS: NAME (LAST. FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST)
PH(~NE ~ W~TH AREA CODE
II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION r (MUST BE COMPL.ETED)
~,x bo~toindJcale ~ INDtVIDUAL
~RPORATION ~ PARTNERSHIP
STATE .~ ZiP CODE__
III. TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME OF OWNER CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION
MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS
LOCAL-AGENCY [~ STATE*AGENCY
COUNTY-AGENCY [~ FEDERAL-AGENCY
~' box to indicate [~ INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL.AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY
[~ CORPORATION [~ PARTNERSHIP [~ COUNTY-AGENCY [~ FEDERAL-AGENCY
CITY NAME STATE
IZIP CODE
PHONE # WiTH AREA CODE
IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise.
TY(TK) HQ I
V. PETROLEUM MST FINANCIAL R,.~r. SPONSIBILITY - (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED
./ box toindicate '_.~r'~ELF-INSURED ! r~] 2 GUARANTEE E~ 3 INSURANCE
~ ~ 5 LE'I'FER OF CREDIT [~} 6 EXEMPTION ~ 99 OTHER
SURETY BOND
VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notification and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked.
ICHECK ONE SOX INDICATING WHICH ABOVE ADDRESS SHOULD BE USED FOR LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS AND BILLING: I.
THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. IS TRUE AND CORRECT
IAPPL~ANT'S NAM'F~.(PRINTED &SIGNATURE) .,. ~ APPLICANT'S TITLE
LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY (-..-/
COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY #
CENSUS TRACT # - OPTIONAL SUPVISOR- DISTRICT CODE - OPTIONAL
_
LOCATION CODE - OPTIONAL
THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BYAT LEAST (ii OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY.
FORM A (5-91) FOR0033A-5
ADDRESS : ~~' ~0
~E~T #: ~?/~ ?
FILE CONTENTS SUMMARY
ENV.
SENSITIVITY:,
Activity Date # Of Tanks
Comments
KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SERVICE AND COMPLAINT FORM
[] Service Request [] Complaint
CT No. ' Assigned to:
Date. ' '- Time:
_ocetlon .................................................................................. City.
Directions
Reoortlng Person Adclress Pflone
P~operty Owner Address ,~ Phone
Information
Taken ~y
RESULTS· OF
INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................ '...: .......................
Complainant notified
of results ......................... investigated by ................................................................................ .~. Date
Environmental Health 580 4113 2029 (Rev. 9/69)
¸3*
PERMIT NUMBER
310039
TYPE OF INSTALLATION
N/A ( ) 1. In-Tank Level Sensor ( ) 2. Leak Detector ( ) 3. Fill Box
FACILITY NAME
California Water Service Company
FACILITY ADDRESS 3725 SO, "H" Street, Bakersfield, CA 93304
CONTACT PERSON
Mel Byrd or Ed Wegemer
1. IN TANK LEVEL SENSORS
Number of Tanks N/A
List By Tank ID
Name of System
Manufacturer & Model Number
Contractor/Installer
2. LEAK DETECTORS
Number of Tanks N/A List By Tank ID
Name of System
Manufacturer & Model Number
Contractor/Installer
FILL BOXES
Number of Tanks
N/A
List By Tank ID
Name of System * l
Manufacturer & Model Number
Contractor/Installer
After further review of our storage fuel system we fee] our dispensing facility, should
be re-classified as a suction system. Your records indicate we have fuel distri'buted
through'pressurized product lines, which would require an automatic line leak detection
system. This mistake was discovered in our original permit application and will need to
be corrected in order to remain in compliance with Federal Regulations Part 280 and 281.
Thank you for your cooperation. Any further questions please contact Mel Byrd or
EH l^l~m~r (RN~I ~?-?1~1
OWN]~/bP Ei~-(JR ..... DATE
PERM I T
NUMBER OF TANKS AT THE SITE: ENV. $]qN$ITIVIT¥ .........
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(PRIMARY): NAME:
PHONE NUMBER: .............................................................................................................
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON(SECONDARY): NAME:
PHONE NUMBER:
TANK OWNER INFORMATION:
NAME:
AODRESS:
PHONE NO.:
TANK CONTENTS:
TANK ~ MANUFACTURER YEAR INSTALLED CAPACITY CONTENTS
TANK CONSTRUCTION:
TANK ;~ TYPE(dw, sw, sec.cont.) MATERIAL INT. LINING CORROSION PROT.
LEAK DETECTION: TANKS: VISUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
VADOSE ZONE MONITORING WELLS U-TUBES WITH LINERS
U-TUBES WITHOUT LINERS VAPOR DETECTOR , , LIQUID SENSORS
CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS PRESSURE SENSORS IN ANNULAR SPACE
LIQUID RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS IN U-TUBES, MONITORING WELLS, OR ANNULAR
NONE UNKNOWN OTHER
PIPING INFORMATION:
TANK ~ '~J'~M TYPE
CONSTRUCTION
(SN,DN,LINED TR)
MATERIAL
LE.&K DETECTION: PIPING: FLOW RESTRICTING LEAK DETECTORS FOR PRESSURIZED
ND'E
ENVIRONN.ENTAL CORP.
**** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY ****
PRECISION VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST
The following underground storage tank system has been tested and is
certified within the allowable limit of NFPA Title 329 at:
the full system level.
STATION NUMBER
FIELD OFFICE
TANK LOCATION:
TANK NUMBER
TANK CAPACITY
4K UNLEADED 4000
TANK CONTENTS
REG/UNLEADED
CAL. WATER SERV. (FLD. OFFICE)
3725 SOUTH ~H' STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304
TANK OWNER:
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. is authorized to test and certify this
tank by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requlations and
Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA /
Title 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification/
standards set by the Federal, State, and LoCal jurisdictional agencies.
Certification Date : 08/03/90
Test Results Certified by : NIKE WALTERS ·(LIC # 1310)
Recertification Date Recommended : 08/03/1991
Certification Signature:
MIKE WALTERS
1310
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY
System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.05gph : Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph : Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 TORRANCE,, CA 90503 (213) 212-5244
CAPACITY 4000 GAL
STAT # FIELD OFFICE
TANK # 4K UNLEADED
TEST DATE: 08/03/90
1. Owner of storage tanks
Company Representative
Title
PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented
SHORT REPORT FORM @Copyright 1985-1990
PAGE 1
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
KENT ADNEY
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUPERVISOR
2. Mailing address of owner
3. Phone of owner
4. Station number
5. Location name for tanks
'Location address for tanks
Location phone number
Operator of location
6. Regulatory Agency .
7. Tank designation or ID #
8. Date tank was tested
9. Precision test performed
Name of testing company
Mailing address of testing
company
Testing company telephone
10. Technician conducting test
Test Certified by
License Number
11. Capacity of tank
12..-Tank construction material
13. Testing liquid
P.O. BOX'1150
SAN JOSE, CA 95108
408) 453-8414
IELD OFFICE
CAL. WATER SERV. (FLD. OFFICE)
3725 SOUTH 'H' STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304
805) 832-2141
ALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
COUNTY'OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
4K UNLEADED
08/03/90
NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
2909 OREGON CT., B-2
TORRANCE, CA 90503 . ./-',./'7
(213) 212-5244
LLOYD NCVITTIE :
1310 ,,'
Y
4000 Gallons ,.
STEEL
REG/UNLEADED
14. A Full System test was performed. The system passed with the leak rate
shown below.
Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable change is in
accordance with Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire
Protection Association NFPA Title 329.
MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: +0.038 GALLONS PER HOUR
LOSS (+) or GAIN (,),
This measurement is within the allowable limits established in
NFPA 329 for a tight tank or tank system.
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY
System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O.05gph = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph = Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (213) 212-5244
CAPACITY 4000 GAL
STAT # FIELD OFFICE
TANK # 4K UNLEADED
TEST DATE: 08/03/90
PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Patented
SHORT REPORT FORH @Copyright 1985-.1990
PAGE 2.
PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA
Tank Owner - CALIF. WATER SERVICE
.,Tank Number - 4K U/L
Measurement # 16
Date of Test = 08/02/1990
Time of measurement ........... =
Tank Temperature ..............
Tank Pressure ................. =
Basic Tank Volume ************* =
Temperature Correction ********
Pressure Correction *********** :
Corrected Volume **************:
Leak Rate Calculation .Time .... :
'Geometry-Band .................
Total Fluid Level .......... ;..
Volume Change ................ '. =
Expected Level Change .........
Avg Strat Volume Change *******
Avg Strat Expected Level Change
Avg Strat Apparent Leak *******
Avg Strat Apparent Leak Rate **
12:41:40
90.7657 Degrees F.
0.0092 PSI
4000.679 Gallons
78.607 Gallons
0.000 Gallons
40Z9.286 Gallons
01:15:30
-0.001 Gallons/Hour
121.2632 Inches
-0.032 Gallons'
-0.1830 Inches
-0.088 Gallons
-0.5058 Inches
0.052 Gallons
0.038 Gallons/Hour
COMPUTERI7FD PlOT OF [FAKAGF RATE DATA
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. PROPRIETARY
System Accuracy (Standard Tank): O,05gph = Pd>O.95/Pfa<O.05; 0.10gph = Pd>O.99/Pfa<O.01
NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. 2909 OREGON CT., B-2 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (213) 212-5244
TECHNOLOGY. INC.
**** CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRITY www.
PRECISION VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE LE~K TEST
The following underground storage tank system has been tested and is
certified within the allowable limit of NFPA Title 329 at:
44 INCHES ABOVE TANK TOP (FULL-SYSTEM).
STATION NUMBER
'FIELD OFFICE
TANK LOCATION:
TANK OWNER
TANK NUMBER TANK CAPACITY TANK CONTENTS
4K REG UNL 4~
REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE F/O
3725 SOUTH 'H' STREET
DAKERSFIELD, CA
°
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. is authorized to test and certify this
tank by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State RequlatiQ~s and
Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association NFPA
Tit4e 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification
standards set by the Federal, State, amd Local jurisdictional agencies.
Certification Date
Certification No.
Certified Tester
Recertification Date Recommended
: 05/22/89
: NDE-CT-OS/Z2/89
: HENSLEY BRRBOUR
: 05/22/1990
(TEST TECHNICIAN)
Certification Signature:
_LARY /
IONS/TESTING TECHNICIAN
NDE TECHNOLOGY
-' JUL Z 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL FiEALTH
INC. PROPRIETARY
CAPSCITY 4000 GAL
ST~T ~ FIELD OFFICE
~ENK ~ 4K PEG UNL'
TEST DATE: .OS/ZZ/89
~.,cCISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTIN~ RESULT Patent Pending
SHORT REPORT FORM @Copyright 198S,1988
P~GE t
Owner of storage tanks
Company Represen'tative
Title
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
CRAIG GILMOUR
WATER QUALITY ASSISTANT
Mailing address of owner
3. Phone of owner
4. Station number
S, Location name for tanks
Location address for tanks
Location phone number
Operator of location
P.O. BOX 11S0
SAN JOSE, CA 9S108
(408) 298-1414
FIELD OFFICE
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE F/O
37ZS SOUTH 'H' STREET
8AKERSFIELO, CA~
(80S) 83Z-Z141
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
B. Regulatory ~gency
COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7. Tank designation or ID $
8. Date tank was tested
g. Precision test parrot'mad
Name of testing company
Mailing address of testing
company
Testing company telephone
10. Technician conducting test
Reviewed by
11 Capacity of tank
12.'-Tank construction material
13. Testing liquid
KEN HILLARY
40~0 Gallon5
UNKNOWN
4K PEG UNL
85/22/89
NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2909 OREGON CT., B-1
TORRANCE, CR 90503
HENSLEY BhRBOUR :
REGULAR UNEEADED GASOLINE'
14. 5 test was performed at 44 INCHES ABOVE TANK TOP (FULL-SYSTEM>.
The system passed with the leak rate shown below.
Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable change is in
accordance with Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire
Protection ~ssociation NFP~ Title 329.
MEASURED NUMERICAL LEAKAGE RATE IS: (-) 0.033 GALLONS PER HOUR
LOSS (+) or GAIN (-).
This Measurement is within the allouable liMits established in
NlrpA 329 for a tight tank or tank SySteM.
NDE TECHNOLO6'Y, INC.;. PROPRiEThRY
CAPACITY 4000 GAL'
STAT ~ FIELD OFFICE
.TANK ~ 4K PEG UNL
TEST DATE:.OS/Z2/Gg
~,,£CISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTINb RESULT
SHORT REPORT FORM
P~GE 2
PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA
Tank Owner - WATER SERVICE (FIELD OFFICE)
Tank Number- 4K UNL
Measurement ~ 20
Date of Test : 0512211989
Time of measurement ........... =
Tank. Temperature ..............
Tank Pressure ............ ~ .... :
Basic Tank Volume ************* =
Temperature Correction ******** :
Pressure Correction *********** :
Corrected Volume ************** :
77.0906 Degrees F,
0.1912 FSI
4000.520 Gallons
44.482 6allons'
0.004 Gallons
4044.987 Gallons
Leak R~te Calculation Time .... = 01:01:S4
Geometry Band ................. :
Total Fluid Level ............. =
Volume Change ................. =
E~pected Level Change ......... =
Avg Strat Volume Change ******* =
Avg Strat Expected Level Change =
Avg Strat Apparent Leak ******* =
~vg Strat 8pparent Leak Rate ** =
0.001 Gallons/Hour
119'.3755 Inches
0.026 Gallons
0.1814 Inches
0.022 Gallons
0.1532 Inches
-0.034 Gallons
-0.~33 Gallons/Hour
COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE OAT8
· 09
.08
.07
.06
.03
.02
-
- ,03
TFST TTMF - hITNI IT~
NDE TECttNOLOGY, iNE. 2909 OP, EGON CT., B-i TOP, P, ANCE, CP, qO~O~ (2 x) d~/~d~
NDE TECHNOLOGY
Patent Pending
INC. PROPRIETARY
I~, ~.lE TECHNOLOGY .
**** CERTIFICATE 0~- UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
PRECISION VOLUMETRIC qUANTITATIVE LEAK TEST
The following underQround's~orage tank system has been tested an
certified TIGHT at: GRADE LEVEL.
STATION NUMBER
"H" STREET
TANK NUMBER TANK CAPACITY
FLD OFF 4(~00
TANK CONTENTS
UNLEADED
'TANK LOOATION:
TANK OWNER:
CALIFORNIA WATER/"H" STREET
3?25 S. "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC, is authorized to test and certify this
tank. by the: COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
This CERTIFICATION meets the requirements of State Requ'lations a
Guidelines based on National Fire Protection Association Title '
NFPA 329. This certification meets or exceeds certification'
standards set by the Federal, State, and Local jurisdictional,'ag
Certification Date
Certification No.
Certified Tester
Recertification Date Recommended
Certifi~,~tion Signat.ure: ~
DIRECTOR OF/,OPERATIONS /
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PR
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT., B'l TORRRNCE, CA'90503 (213) 212-52~4
INTEGRITY ****
is
~d
~ncies.
: 0S/!!/88
: NDE-CT-OS/Il/88
: MICHAEL DOLIM <TEST ~ECHNICIAN
: OS/11/89
IPRtETARY
CAPACITY 4000 gal PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK
STAT ~ "H" STREET
TANK ~ FLO OFF, 4K' ULP
TEST DATE: '0S/II/88
Owner of storage tanks
Company Refresentative
Title
2. Mailing address of owner
3. Phone of owner
4. Station number
Location name for tanks
Location address for tanks
LoBation phone number
Manager or operator
at location
Regulatory Agency
7. Tank designation or ID ~
8. Bate tank was tested
8. Precision test performed
Business name of t~ ~
ws~ing
company
Mailing address of testing
company
Testing company telephone
10. Technician conducting test
Reviewed by
Capacity of tank
Tank construction mater'iai
Testing liquid
TESTING RESULT , ate t pending
SHORT REPORT FORM - @Copyright 198S
PAGE 1
CALIFORNIA WATERSERVICE COMPANY
CRAIG GILMOUR
Company Representative
e.0. 80X 1150
SAN JOSE, C~ ~5108
(408) 298-14~4
"H" STREET
CALIFORNIA WATER/"H" STREET
37ZS S. "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
(80S) 83Z-Z144
MEL BYRD
COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFO!
FLD OFF 4K ULP
.0S/11/88
NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK'
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INIA .
TESTING SYSTEM
Z909 OREGON CT.,
TORRRNCE, CR 90503
(Z13) 21Z-SZ44
MICHAEL DOLIM :
DAISY E. MOSBY :
4000 gallons
UNKNOWN
UNLERDED
The Underground'Storage Tank System was tested at the foil ~ing level:
GRADE LEVEL.
The Underground Storage Tank System WAS tight at the testa level.
Allowable leak. resolution of instrumentation or allowable chance is in
Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection
Association Title NFP8 329.
Measured Numerical Leakaqe Rate is: (-) 0.048
Loss (+) or Gain (-).
This Measurement is ~ithin the allowable limits establi
NFPA ~Z9 for a Tight tank or tank 5VStOM..
Gallons Per Hour
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
HOE T£CHHOLOGY, INC. Zg0g OREGON Cf., 8-1 TORRI~HCE, CR g050~ (ZI~) Z12-52~'~
~hed in
oROPRtETAR'{
~LT Rat ~,nt pending
CGP~CITY 40~0 gal PR~C;~ION .UNDERGROUND TANk( TESTING
STAT ~ "H" STREET SHORT REPORT
TANK ~ FLD OFF 4K PAGE 2
TEST DATE: 05/II/88
PRINTOUT OF TANK SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE OATA
Tank Owner - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
Tank. Number - UNLEAOED 4K
Measurement ~ 40
Date of Test = 051111198S
Time of measurement ........... = 20:04:12
Tank Temperature .............. =
Tank Pressure ................. =
Basic Tank Volume ************* =
Temperature Correction ****~*** =
Pressure Correction *********** =
Corrected Volume ************** =
'71.2304 degrees
0.1387 psi
4800.804 Gallons
28,895 Gallons
0.003 Gallons
~029,502 Gallons
Elap'sed Time .................. = 00:S8:28
Geometry Band ................. =
Total Fluid Level ............. =.
Volume Change ................. =
Expected Level Change ......... =
Strat Expected Level Change *** =
S%rat Apparent Leak *********** =
Strat Apparent Leak Rate ****** =
-0.001 Gallons/Hour
110.1577 inches
-0.037 Gallons
-0.3347 inches
-0.2629 imches
-0.0467 Gallons
-0.048 Gallons/Hour
COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE DATA
1
PasI
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. Z909 OREGON CT., B-1 TORRF;NCE, CF; 90503 (215) 212:5244
CAPACITY 4000 gal' PRECISION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING RESULT Pate t
STAT ~ "H" STREET GENERAL REPORT FORM - @Copyr
TANK ~ FLD OFF 4K ULP PAGE 1
TEST DATE: 05/11/88
Owner of storage tanks
Company Representative
Title
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY
CRAIG GILMOUR
Company Representative
Mailing address of owner
Phone of owner
4. Station number
S. 'Location name for tanks
Location address for tanks
Location phone number
Manager or operator
at location
Regulatory Agency
P.O. BOX 1150
SAN JOSE, CR 95108
(408) 298-1414
"H" STREET
CALIFORNIA WATER/"H" STREET
37Z5 S. "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CR
(805) 83Z~Z144
MEL 8YRO
COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
pending
~ght 1985
7. Tank designation or ID ~
8. Date tank was tested
g, Precision test performed
Business name of testing
company
Mailing address of testing
company
Testing company telephone
10. Technician conducting test
Reviewed by
tl. Capacity of tank
12. Tank. construction Material
13. Testing liquid
FLD OFF 4K ULP
05/11/88
NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK TESTING SYSTEM
.NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2909 OREGON CT., 8-1
TORRANCE, CA ~0503--~__~/~/
MICHAEL DOLIH
· '
40~ gallon~
UNKNOgN
UNLEADED
/
14. The Underground Storage Tank. System was tested at the folloi
6RADE LEVEL.
15. The Underground Storage Tank System WAS tight at the tested level.
Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation or allowable chang is in
Regulations and Guidelines based on National Fire Protection
Association Title NFPA '529.
Measured Numerical Leakaqe Rate is: (-) 0.048 Gallons er Hour
Loss (+) or Gain (-' Jh
This oeasUreMent is within the allowable liMi%s establi ed in
HFPA ~29 for. a Tigh~ tank OF tank
NDE TECHNOLOSY, INC. 'ROPRIETARY
NDE ~ECHNOLO~f, INC. 2909 0~E~ON CL, B-1 ~0ERRNCE~ C~ 90503 <21D
ins level:
CAPGCiT'{ 4000 gai PRE,,
STAT ~ "H" STREET
TANK ~ FLO OFF 4K
TEST DATE: 0S/I1/88
ION UNDERGROUND TANK TESTING
GENERAL REPORT
PAGE 2
1. Capacity of the tank
4~X~
2. Present or past contents
3. Testing liquid
4. Tank. construction Material
UNLEADED
UNLEADED'
UNKNOWN
S. a. Tank, inclination (degrees) 0
b. Fill pipe inclination (degrees) 0
G. a. Internal diameter of tank 6B
b. Tank bottom to grade level ll!
7. a. Fill pipe internal diameter 4
b. Fill pipe length 48
c. Top of fill pipe to tank bottom 117
d. Top of fill pipe to grade level +8
8. Air vents 1
9. Type of fill pipe cap CAMLOCK
10. Type of pumps associated SUCTION
with the appurtenant piping
ll. Coefficient of thermal expansion
12. Specifio gravity .?SO
1~. Bulk Modulus
14. Type of phase Ii vapor BALANCE
recovery system
1S. Depth of groundwater frOM UNKNOWN
grade level
16. Date and Time storage
tank system was
topped off for testing
17. Total product level 110
from tank bo%tom
~M
volumetric coefficient o
LT Pate
pending
gallons
05/10/88
inches
inches
inches
inches
inches
inches
number
expansion/dog
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NO[ T[CHNOLtlGY, INC, 2~O~q OR[GON Cf., 8-1 [ORR~NC£, CA .~050~ (ZID Z1Z-SZ~
inches
date
time.
inches
iOPRIETARY
CAPACITY 4900 Ual PRE~
STAT ~ "H" STREET
TANK ~ FLD OFF 4K U
TEST DATE: 05111/88
iON UNBEEGROUND TANk TESTING
GENERAL. REPORT
· PAGE 3
General notes and log entries.
NONE
LT Pa~er
Other measurements or readings not included in the computer
NONE
Any special procedures performed other than NDE Computerized
Testing Procedures.
NONE
t pending
~rintout.
VPLT Tank
Description of any repairs made to the storage tank system prior to
or during the test.
NONE
suited in
S. Describe any recommended repairs. ·
NONE
6.'~ Describe any significant delays not caused by tester ~hat r~
delays in completing the test.
NONE
Describe quantity of liquids removed
liquids added to tank by tester from tester storage tanks.
NONE
.,
from tank and not replaced
or
If tank. was subject to sludge deposits during normal use, was it
properly cleaned prior to testing?
N/~
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. PROPRIETARY
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 0REGGB CT., 8-1 1ORR~N££, C~ 90503 (213) 212-524g
CGPACITY 4000 gal PR~
STGT ~ "H" STREET
TANK ~ FLD OFF 4K ULP
TEST D~TE:'05/11/88
tON UNDERGROUNO TANK TESTING ~
GENERAL REPORT FORM
PAGE 4
LT Patent
.TOTAL TEST CONDUCTION TIME -
Leak Rate Calculation Time:
Start
End
Z HOURS, 16 MINUTES
1747
Z004
(Calculated leak rate based on data generated during the fi~
hour of testing.)
3. Test performed with liquid
af how many inches above grade
-1
4. Location in the tank system where test was conducted
IN FILL PIPE
S. Height of water present in tank
0
PIPING PRESSURE TEST - PNEUMATIC PRESSURE OATA
6. Piping Pressure Test Conducted? NO
?. Amount of pressure initially applied to the system
8. Amount of pressure drop, if any:
9. Amount of time elapsed during the test
10. Piping Pressure Test Leak Rate is N/R
Was turbine pump activated?.
NO
12. If full system leakage rates are in excess'of allowable lim
owners notified of any additional testing procedures recess
leakage to the tank or piping? N/A
l~. Have these additional testing procedures been completed?
N/R
VAPOR POCKET EVGLU~TION
14. Does the tank show evidence of vapor pockets?
NO
If yes, was the owner informed of any additional procedure
necessary to release trapped vapor prior to completion of
N/~
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. ~,09 OREGON CT,, B-1 TORRANCE, CA 90505 (213) 212SZ44
pending
hours
military hours
military hours
al
inches
inches
psi
psi
Minutes
Gallons/Hour
ts, were the
ny to isolate
eating?
ROPRIETARY
CAPACITY 4000 gal
STAT ~ "H" STREET
TANK ~ FLD OFF 4K ULP
TEST DATE: 0S/1~/B8
ION UNBERGROUNB TANK TESTING LT Pat,
GENERAL REPORT Ft]RH
PAGE 5
PRINTOUT OF TANK 'SYSTEM LEAKAGE RATE DATA
Tank Owner - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
Tank Number - UNLEADED 4K
Measurement ~ 40
Date of Test = 85/11/1988
Time of measurement ........... = ~8:04:12
Tank Temperature .............. =
Tank Pressure ................. =
Basic Tank Volume ************* =
Temperature Correction ******** =
Pressure Correction *********** =
Corrected Uolume ************** =
71 2304 degrees
8 i387 psi
4000 804 Gallons
28 695 Gallons
0 003 Gallons
4029 502 6allons
Elapsed Time .................. = 80:58:28
'Geometry Band .................
Total Fluid Level .............
Volume Change .................
Expected Level Change .........
Strat Expected Level Change
Strat Apparent Leak ***********
Strat Apparent Leak Rate ******
-0.001 Gallons/Hour
110.1S?? inches
-8.037 Gallons
-0.3347 inches
-8.2629 inches
-0.046? Gallons
-8.048 Gallons/Hour
COMPUTERIZEO PLOT OF LEAKAGE RATE DRTR
I I I i I t I I I I I I I i I I I t i I I I I
TFF;T TTt'IF - HTFIIITF'.-~
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2909 OREGON CT,.. 8-t TORRANCE, C~ 9OSOS <21S) 212-52q4
nt pending
ROPRIETARY
C6PACITY 4000 Qat ;tON UNDERGROUND TANK TESTIii
STAT ~ "H" STREET GENERAL REPOR-
TANK ~ FLB OFF 4K ULP PAGE
TEST DATE: 05/11788
COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF AVERAGE TEMPERATURE
ORM
JLT Part
71.26 -"-.
COMPUTERIZED PLOT OF LIQUIO LEVEL
-.6
--.7 ·
-.8
TV:O,T TTH~ - MTt411T'~'~
COMPUTERIZEO PLOT OF PRESSURE 06TA
138
1:37
136 ...-' v'
135 ..~-~'--~'
134 ' /",, , '""
· 133 /"' ~/""
· 132 ~--/ 'v'
.131 .¢~
.130 .
'~ ....
.126 / ~-
1~'5
....
.t24 [ "
/~122 '
,/ . 121
nt pending
NOE TECHNOLOGY, INC. :~ROPRIETSRY
HIE fEL'.HftOLOG"~'~ ll!L', ,~909 OREGOtt t~T,, 8-I I'ORRRf~CE.. L'8 9050~ '~.~l~) 2 ',!'SZ44
American nk %s,ting Service, Inc.
8404 Magnolia Avenue, Suite A, Santee, California 92071 · (619) 562-7300
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO. SITE ~123
-3725 SOUTH "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA: 93304
CERTIFICATE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INTEGRIT~ ''
PRECISION ¥OLU~ETRIC QUANTITATIVE VOLU~ETRIC LEAK TEST
AMERICAN TANK TESTING SERVICE INC. has tested the following
-underground storage tank systems, and certifies them. at the
product height equal to the grade level.
Tank System Tested~
1. 4000 PREMIUM UNLEADED
AMERICAN TANK TESTING SERVICE INC. is authorized to test and
certify these tanks by' the County of Kern.
This certification meets or exceeds certification s'tan~ards set
by the State of California, Federal, and Local jurisdi=tional
agencies.
AMERICAN TANK TESTING SERVICE INC. Certification meets the
requirements of California Administrative Code Title 23 Water
Resources Control Board. Subchapter 16 Underground stbrage
Regulations. Part 2643. The leak test certifies the beak
resolution of instrumentation or allowable change is nb more than
0.05 gallons per hour as cited in Part 2643(b) on Paqel 4.14.
Date
Certification No.
Certified Tester
JULY 21 1987
ATTS-~7-1239-152
RANDALL M. BARNES, TECHNICI
Recertification Date Recommended JULY 198~
Certification Signature:
CAPACITY 4.~ gal PRECIsiON UNOERGROUNO TANK TESTING RESO=T Pa'
ST~T ~ SITE~IZ3 P~GE t, SHORT REPORT FORM ~ ~Copy~
TANK ~ #1 '
TEST OATE:'7/Zll87 NDE TECHNOLOGY, Il
Owner of storage tanks
Company Representative
Title
CALIFORNIA WATER SERICE CO.
ED WEGEMER
Company Representative
Mailing address of owner
Phone of owner
4. Station number
S. Location and address of
the tanks
'Phone number
6. Regulatory ~gency
P.O. BOX 1150
SAN gOSE, CA 95108
(~08) Z98-1~14
SITE#lZ3
3?ZS SO. "H" ST.
BAKERS.FIELD, CR 93304
(805) 8Z3-Z141
COUNTY OF KERN
?. Tank designation or ID ~ #1
8. Date tank was tested 7/Zl/87
B. The name of the test me~hod NDE VPLT COMPUTERIZED TANK LEAK
Business name of tank
testing company
Mailing address of tank
testing company
10. Person conducting te~t
and Completing repor~
Il. S~a~ion Opera~or or
Manager
12. Phone number
13 Owner name and title
14. Capacity of tank.
ant pending
Light 1985
lC. PROPRIETARY
TESTING SYSTEM
AMERICAN TANK TESTING SERVICE, INC.
8404 MAGNOLIA, SUITE A
SRNTEE, CR 92071
( 819 > 56Z-7300
RRNORLL M. ~)RRN~$
ED WEGENER,PRODUCTION SUPT. ~/
(8~S) 8Z3-ZI41 '
--
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 'CO.
15. Present or past contents PREM. UNLEA
1~. Tank construction'Material UNKNOWN
PREM. UNLEADED
17. Testing fluid
18. (a) THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM CERTIFIED TIGHT AT
HEIGHT EQUAL TO THE GRADE LEVEL.
YES
TEST TECHNICIAN)
gallons
~RODUCT
(b) Allowable leak resolution of instrumentation o~ allowable change per
California Administrative Code Title 23 Waters, Chapter 3 Water
Resources Control Board Subchapter 16 Undmrground Storage
Regulations, Part 284~ (b>, Page 4.14; 0.OS gallons perlhour.
*** (c) MEASURED HOURLY CHANGE: LOSS (+) OR GAIN (-) GALLONS OR NUMERICEL LEAK
RATE IS: + .OZZ Ge,lions Per Hour m
This Measurnent is within the legal limits as defined
NDE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
R~£R1CB) lRHK IEStI~G SERU1C[, I~C. B~Q~ MRG~.EIR, SUII£ ~ SAblE, CR 92071 (619) 5624]00
PlOPRI
ETARY
CAPACITY 4.~)~ gal PRECi'. ON UNDERGROUND ~RNK TESTING RE5 _r Pa
TANK ~ M1 " PAGE 2
STAT ; SITE#IZ~ SHORT REPORT FORM - TEST PROCEDUR
TEST DATE: ?IZIlB?' @Copyrt
NDE TECHNOLOGY,
COMPUTERIZED PRINTOUT OF DIGITAL LEAKRGE R~TE DATA
renk Owr,~r - CALIFORNIA WRTER SERUiCE
T~nk Nu~tbet- ' ~
Qm'~e 0¢ les~
Tmnk Temperature = 84.7491 degreo~ F
Tank Rr'esmure = ,8177 psi.
Basic Tenk Volume = 4~,74~ Gallen~,
Temperature Cor'.rec~ion = G~.OB~ G~llons.
Pressure Correc'~J. on.= .017
Correct. ed Volu~e = 40G£.84~
Expected Level Change = .45Sl~ inchea
Hee~ured l. ev~[ Change ~ ,Z,tBB~ Inches
Tole! Fluid L~ve! = ;3Z.27@ inch~s
Eleps~d Li~e ~ ~0:57:21
P~imery Appmrent Leek Retm = .~22 Gellons/
Geometry Bend = .0010 Ge!Ions/Hour
? COHPUTERIZED PLOTS OF LE~KRGE RRTE DETE
tent pending
ES
ght IB8S
INC. PROPRIETARY
· TE~T..T;ME - II!HUTE.~ . .
FIDE TECHNOLOGY, .INC. PROPRIETARY
[~ALIFORi~IA WATER SERXqCE COHPA_NIf,
ITI~0 NORT]~' ~IRST STREET · P. 0. BOX 1150 · SAN JOSB, C~k 93108 ' (408) ~98-1414 .
July 10, 1987
Mark Pishinsky
County of Kern
Environmental Health Division
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield~ CA 93305
,ix'Dear Mr. Pishinsky:
~:i.,~.,~;.~,~,,!,--,/.i~???,i,..-....'0n'-FebruarY" ~, '-1987,' i' Su~mit~ted a letter c~ncerning~ t~
~ii,~,>'~i}:f~'~,~i~i~-;7,1~:~of .operational parameters for California Water Service [Comp
.~'/~=Junderground fuel storage '~nks.'-"Specifically'?~6U~%equeS~te
.~;~-~;~~:~?~.;~info~a'tion regarding .S.t~ike~ ' ates,.;:.tank ca
Our Bakersfield district has been pursuing compliance with :heSe
.requirements. for each affected fuel storage tank. We are hgreby'~
providing notification that each facility has the aforementioned
equipment installed and in use. Additionally, enclosed are the tank ~,: ,. .....
capacity charts provided to us by McCarthy Tank and Steel .C~mpany as
requested. ' i
If you have any additional questions concerning thi
cOntact this office at (408) 298-1414. Please contact,Mr.', Mel Byrd at ...:,~':-'~'-'",~..~ , ,
our Bakersfield district office if you would like to ~nspecl any one .
of the individual sites. An appointment can be scheduled b: calling
him at 832-2141.
Sincerely,
Craig G/lmour
Water Quality Engineering Associate
CG/rt
Enclosure
cc: Mr. B. D. Lewis
Mr. M. Byrd
C.~J.,IFORI%TIA X6TATER SERAr[CE COHPA:.'~Y
IT20 NORT/~ F/~ST STR~ZT · P. 0, BOX 1150 · S~k~ JOS~; ~ 95108 ' (400) E98-1414
September 11, 1986
Bill Scheide
County of Kern
Health Department
Underground Tank Section
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Dear Mr. Scheide:
Per our earlier discussion, enclosed are the permit check
(9) of California Water Service Company's underground sto
which are located within our Bakersfield district.
Our records reveal that Kern County currently has issued
operate for nine of the eleven non-metered tanks that we'
in service. The nine non-metered tank permit numbers are
o 050074C
050075C
050076C
090027G
170006C
280024C
290002C
310037C
'310038C
lists for nine
rage tanks
)ermits to
:urrently have
as follows:
Two non-metered tanks remain to be permitted by your ageBcy. TheSe two
tanks are located at Truxton Avenue, and Milloak Run and have capacities
of 1OO0 and 550 gallons respectively. We are requestinglthat your
agency provide the necessary application(s) for the permitting of these
tanks.
In addition, 'our 1500 gallon tank' with permit #220004C i inactive and
has not contained any product for quite some time. We a~e not planning
to use this tank in the future,'therefore, please provid~ us with the
necessary form(s) and guidelines f0~ the closure_of_this tank.
Our 4000 gallon storage tank with Permit #3i0039C. is a m&tered tank and
we are progressing with the mandatory meter calibration I~nd monitoring.
We will keep you apprised of our progress in meeting the monitoring
goals.
Page 2
CALIFORNIA WATER SEI~VICE COMPANY
As required by the Kern County underground, storage tank ore
enclosed are the precision test results for each of the abo
tanks with the exception.of the abandoned tank. As can be
tank has been certified as tight by the testing consultant.
If you have further questions concernng the. permitted tanks
precision test results, please contact this office at (408)
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Water Quality Engineering Associate
CG/rt
Enclosure
cc: Mr. B. D. Lewis
?
inance,
~e mentioned
seen, each
or the
298-1414.
PERMIT CHECKLIST
Facility California Water Service Co., 3725 So. H Street
Permi
This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet en
and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implem,
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addre~
within 30 days of receipt.
Check:
Yes No
t # 310039C
:losures were received
~nt the first phase of
sed envelope provided
\
A. ThE'packet I received contained:
1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase
Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement
Operator), Chapter I5 (KCOC '#G-394I), Explanation of
Equipment Lists and Return Envelope.
2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10.
3) The Following Forms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet
b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
4) An Action Chart (to post at facility)
B. I have examined the
I Interim Permit
Between O~ner and
Substance Codes,
information on my Interim Perm ,, Phase I Monitoring
Requirements, and Information Sheet (Acreement between"O~ner and Operator). and
find owner's name and address, facility name and addresS, operator's name and
address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the backside ~f this sheet).
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on p I) Acceptable gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s)
3) Water-finding paste
D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Informatic
Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a co
owner and operator).
age 6 of Handbook):
n Sheet" pertaining to
that the o~ner of this
py of agreement between
E, I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label char%(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed On permit). .
F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters atlthis facility have had
calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered
device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of H~.ndbook).
G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this
with procedures.described in Handbook #UT-10.
Date Started
Signature of Person Completing Checklis~:./~_.,~¢~/~.-?~.
Title: Director~r Quality
Date:
September 3, 1986
facility in accordance
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Telel~hone (805) 861-3636
~N
INTERIM PERMIT
TO OPERATE:
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY:
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY
3725, SO "H" STREET
BAKERSFIELD, ' CA
COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTM HEALTH OFFICER
Leoln M Hebertson, M.D.'
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
DIRECTOR O~F ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~" '
Vernon S. Reichard
I.
ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986
EXPI }~ES.: JULY 1, 1989
NUMBER OF TANKS= 1
OWNER:
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY
1720'N FIRST STREET ... :
'~ - SAN JOSE, CA '95108
,~ ' , ' ~ ......... , ,
:123 *'?~ ~.:?,MVF 2 ~
NOTE:
NON--TRANSFERABLE
ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING TIlE TERM OF TIlIS ~ERMIT, ,:. ~, ·
DATE PERMIT MAIT,V.D: AUG 2 5 I985
DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED:
POST
ON,'
pREMISES
i
Division or Environmental He~ . Application~' .~ March 227 1985
t700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305
' A~PLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGRfRJND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAflE FACILITY
T_~ of Application (check):
ae
[']New Facility DModification of Facility [~Existing Facility []Transfer of Ownership
~ergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days B. D. Lewis 805/324-6011 ·
NightSSupervisorI on call 805/832-2141
Facility Name California Water Service Company No. of Tanks .
Type of Business (check): ~lGaSOl'tne atari'on ~Other (describe) Water utility
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? []Yes [~No
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? []']Yes
Facility Address 3725 South "H" Street Nearest Cross St White Lane
T R SEC (Rura'l Locations ~ly)
Owner California Water Service Company Corltact [~r~n Ge )rge W. Adrian
Address 1720 N. First St., San Jose, CA Zip 95108 Telephone 408/298-1414'
OperatozCalifornia Water Service Company Contact Per~o~' B.I D. Lewis
. Address 1920 Eye St., -Bakersfield, CA Zip 93307 'Telephone I 805/324-6011
~ater tn Facility Provided byCalif°rnia Water Service Co. D~pth t~' Gr~o~%~r 154'
Soil Characteristics at Facilityo"6' silty soil;6,-71, sand;71'-78' yellow clay
Basis for Soil Type and Grour~ater Depth Determinations Water we]'~'~rillers' logs
Contractor CA Contractor' s License NO.
Addr ess Zip Tele[:~ne
Proposed Starting Date Proposed Completion Date
Worker's C~mpensation Certification t Insurer ,I
If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly ~cribe Modifications
Proposed
Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
Tank ! Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premium
-C.
123
[] []
[] []
-----fuel
[]
[]
Diesel Waste
[] I
Chemical C~mposition of Materials Stored (not necessary, for motor vmhicle fu~ls)
Tank $ Chemical Stored (non-co~ercial name) CAS ! (if kno~) ChemiCal Previou~.ly Stored
( if different)
Ge
Transfer of Ownership
Date of ~-ansfer
Previous Facility Name
I,
Previous Owner
accept fully all obligations of Permit NO. __ issued to
I understand that the Permitting Authority may review , a~d
modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate th~s ~dergro~d storage
· facility, , upon receiving this completed form.
·his form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the be~t of my knowledge is
true and correct/. '
Signature _.~..~;.~_..~//~~.. Title Vice Pres nt Date 3/22/85
~ '~rge W.~Adr~an ' ~ '
water Quality
Facility Name California Water Service Company
TANK .. J (FILL OUT SEPARATE FO T K)
F~'R EACH SECTION, ~ECK ~ ~PROPRIATE ~XES
1. Tank is: ~vauited ~n-Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~Si~le~all
2. '~ ~terial F ~
~Car~n S~eel ~Stainless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~_i rglass<l~ Steel
~Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~
~Other (de~ri~)
Primary Containment
Date Installed 7~nickness (Inches)
1981 3/16
Tank Second~r~ Containment
[]Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner
[]-]Other (describe):
Capacity (Gallons) , 4,000
[-]Lined Vault [~None I-IUnknown
Manufacturer:
Manufacturer
Modesto Tank
~TMaterial Thickness (Inches) Ca~acit~ (Gals.)
'5. Tank.Interior ~
~]~R~ber []-]Alkyd ['~Epox¥ [-~Phenolic [']Glass [qClay [~t~lined []Unknown
~Other (de~ri~): '~"
Tank Corrosion Protection
6. ~G~vantz~ ~ass~l~ ~l~yle~ ~ap ~Vinyl'~a~i~
~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~):
Cath~ic Protection: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crificial ~e ~t~
~ri~ Syst~ & Equi~ent:
7. Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interceptio~
a.
weekly
T~nk:~ [2]Visual (vaulted tanks only) [[]Groundwater Monitoring'Wall(s)
[-]Vadose Zone Monitorir~ Well(s) []U-Tube Without Liner ·
[U-Tube With Compatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitori?g Well(s)*
[-~Vapor Datector* FTLiguid Level Sensor*DConductivity sensor*
[]]Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank' ,I
~[~Liquid Bstrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitorin~"Well or Annular Space
~i~ Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic'Tightness Testin~
None r~ Unknown [] Other ,~ I-
Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for P~essuriz~d Piping'
-- [2]Monitoring S~p with Raceway D Sealed Concrete Racewa~
~Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway [~Synthetic Liner Raceway [~None
[] Unknown [] Other
*Describe Make & Model:
be
Tightness Tested? ~]Yes '
Date of Last Tightness Test
Test .~Na~e UL label
9. Tank Re~air
Tank Repaired? [2lYes [~No
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
1981
10.
[Unknown
Results of Test
Testing C~mpany
a. Underground Piping:
Thickness (inches)
be
[~Yes []No nunkno~n Material
0.145 Diameter 1~" Manufacturer
~]Pressure ~Suction DGravity 'Approximate Length of ~ipe 1~ 20'
Underground Pipir~ Corrosion Protection :
[]-]Galvanized [~Fiberglass-Clad [~Imp~essed Current [-~crificial Anode
[]Polyethylene Wrap [~Electrical Isolation []Vinyl Wr~ [~]Tar or Asphalt
[~Unknown [~None ~Other (describe):
Underground Piping, Secondary Containment:
I-]Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner System [~]None ~Unkno
[~Other (describe):
~trols
~el F°r Abo~e Devices
Galvanized steel pipe
11. Piping
Overfill Protection
[~Operator Fills, Controls,& Visually Monitors Level
[-]Tape Float Gauge [~Float Vent Valves ~Auto Shut- Off Col
[-]Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box ~None ~Unkno~n
[-]Other: List Make & ~
KERN COUNI'~ r-~cAtl~t 'OEPAh:I'/',AFt',
i 700 FLOW~-,k SI'REET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
~,805, ho I -25.31
PLEASE REIURN THIS PORTION TO iNSURE CORRECT' PAYMENT IDENTIFiCATiON
CHAROES P&
r BILLING DATE --
~u~OUNT DU~
,./~d) -----
AMOUNT ENCLOSED'
~T DUE ARE SUBJECT TO PENALTY
· .,,": DUE DATE :
DETACH 'HERE .
U:llYiC; x IK),sTII'IG
J(ERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
1700 FLOWER STREET
3AKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93305
Incomplete information on first page of application en
"Application for Permit to Operate Underground Storage
The information required is noted in re_~d on emclosed c
~itled
Facility~ .
3py.
J j.
Incomplete information on second page(s) of applicatio~ - "Tank
Sheet". The information required is noted in red on e~nclosed copy.
~Plot plan.lackin~ o~r incomplete.
Refer to instruction
sheet enclosed.
----} Other:
DETACH HE
~:¢: - ~AMOUNT
RECEIPT
PAGE .1
10/13/89
2:46 pm
.KERN COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPME, NT
2?00 'M' Street
Bakersf~egd,,.CA 93301
'' . ': (.8'05)' 861-'2615
Invoffce Nbr. 1'
Type of. Order
24185I
· ). CASH REGISTER
H10i289 - 2 I ELS I 10/13/89 I 10/13/89
Line ~escrlption Quantity
1 TANK PLAN CHECK 1
I?0A
VI a
Price Un*t Disc
100.00
Order T~tal
NT I
'1
To~a~
1'00..00
100.'00
Amount Due
10000
Payment Made By CHeck
100.00
TH,AN K YOU !