HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK FILE #1
,/'
Tracking
APN:
#ORK ORDRR
LOC ~
Work Order #: ENO. ~-~
WO Category: Hazmats
wo T~e: /A ~ ~
Reimb.: Y V/ N
RP Code:
INSPECTOR:
PROGRAM:
DESCRIPTION:
HMMP-~nforc~ment HMMP-Permitting
LOCATION:
FACILITY
NAME:
REPORTING PERSON:
PHONE NO.
COMMENTS:
~D~SS
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS."
Site Specific Time A~counting Sheet
/
E~loyee #
Employee Signature ~/~ /'~ j
S~te ~e or ~ess// I/ _ ~
~ing (~cal, S~te, °~eral)
Site Specific status ~lan~es: ....
Code Description (lOths)
Notes:
~ ~ter~ By: ' ~te: ....... '
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR [,WAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Employee #
Employee Signature ,,~'
Site Name or A~res~( ,L,L,
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
Site Specific-Status Changes:
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ..... (lOths)
Notes: .....
r~ W. nt~,r~d By: Date:
~ ~ OPTIONS FOR LEAKING ~
Szte Specific Time Accounting Sheeu
Employee #
~oyee Si~e
Site Name or
Funding (Local. State. of:Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:
Date C~eegOry· Activity Hours
Code Description (lOths)
BJotes:
" .' ./ ' ~ /f .r' , ,, ,'~
~ ~ter~ By: ~te: ..
Permit #
Employee #'
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee Signature
Site Name or.dress
Funding (Local. State. of Federal)
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ( 10ths
.. , o~ I ;~
Notes:
· ' '" -'7'-' '/"
" , 13 /
' ' ~ ," .'"' .d i~' ,, '" , , ,' . ,' '....'~-. ' ?',¥,.~,.~ . ...¢';:,r, r~ /
'r' '/r'; ~ . ' ,~-'W. ~; ' "; " t , "'~ I- '~" ,," ,
' ' 'f ' z ...;,_ ,". '
. .-d': ...!.x, ,, /-. ,:., s ,..,"',.... '+- .~.,:
_ . , .Z'. .,., .~ .,.,..., ..;. ~., .. , ._. ,.{? .
,.L'__ T- . - " '/i " \ ~/' /
., ,. ,,, ,.,
:'-¢.~. ,~ :~-t~':~..'Y' .'~../..~..w .:/¢ ....... .:,..¥,., ,...~. ...., ,,'b,.: x~.J-z ..z~..~./?.~.,,x ~
.~;' ,. /'/: ":...',.. ~? -. ,"; ~
.'~,,. '~' ;".,. r' .,,-7_"T' ~' .u' ~, ,' ...... -, -'- ?-,---.,.- ('~2 ,,' ;f..,. ..¢?, ,"~-,~-. . . .',
Permit #
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or A~0~ess
.// ·
-
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
'Site Specific Time Accounting .Sheet'
Funding (Local, State,. )
Site Specific Status Changes:
eegOry Activity Hours
Date ~ Code Description ( lOths )
Notes:
/,1 ~ . /
, M
/ ' / i :'" ~' ' : /
! '
~ Enter~ By: ' ~te:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKINGTANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ! ~'
Employee # .,:
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address/ ~.~..~
Funding (Local, State, of~Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:
Cat~ egory Activity Hours
Dante,, uo~e Code Description ., ( 10ths
Notes: .........
. ~ ,,
.,., .,.. ,,.~ ,.,-..~ ~ ~ .~ ..... ~ '-'c'.,~.~..at ~ '. -K~ / ~ .~.~ ·
/;.: , .' , ., /' , / ~ : /' .
~":--~,{ ~ ,-~ .L.-~ ,:~,.~, .['-~ .... , ,' ' .' ( -."- " '' ' ~ '
Permit
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or Address
./
CONTRACT OPTIC~S FOR r,~.AKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:
~Date ~eegOry Activity Hours
Code Description ( 10ths )
Da~ Enter~ By: ' ~te:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
/ Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # .!dO0 i~_.,! .~ ,~ /<j Site Specific Status Chan~es:
Employee #
Employee Signature ~//L~(~.~ ....
Site Name or Addr~'s ~ ~
Funding (Local, State, 6f Federal
Cat~egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ( 10ths )
~/. /;.~ '~.-;' , :: I.. ~
Notes:
-/:../' ~L'
~ OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit #.
Employee # /
Employee Signature
, .,.('l
Site· Name or AddresK /7/~~
Funding (Local, State, of Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:...
~ ~ Hours
Category Activity
Date Code Code Description : (1Orbs)
:ONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING T~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
,Employee # ';
!~ployee Signature :,.,._.~.
Site Name or Addr/~ ?~!?.-.X .,~__.~'1. '
Site Specific Status Changes:
Date; ~eegOry IAct~ ivity H~urs
,uo~e Description (10ths)
Notes: ........
,, : / ...
:1
/~
'/ I (" : ~"..
,.x ," ,' ~ :? , . . ,..~;~,~ ,/", ~ ,:
'::',;' . :.. :~ ,.,..~. :. -".'- :,".,,.: -,'~.-: '~ i',,, :,.,, ,
.. "'-- ' .:-~ / ,.x :-, ...... ,' //, /¢ ''~ ' -
: ' ~ '7; .... .~ .... ' .' .... ,'
...... -.,. :.,.. .~. ,:.,~.. ~..~...~_,-, .~. ~ .:>..~.~ ,,'
, ., ... ,..~/?.
.Data Entered
C~fRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
'.J'/?i,,~)/~ Site Specific Stat~s Changes:
Funding (Local, State, o~" Federal)
ctivity ours
Code Description (10tbs)
Date
Notes:
~ Enter~ By: ~te:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet·
..' ." Site Specific Status ~es:
Permit # .,' '..-: ,:~' ', ,/"L~
Employee #
Employee Signature ..,.:-.,~( ... ,.; ,~,:- ,...,
Site Name or ~a~ess......'"
Funding (Local, State, or-'Federal)
Cat. egory Activi{y Hours
Date go~e Code Description (lOths)
:: , .':, . -r '" ~,,/
Notes:
·. ::;~ ~ / I'
Pe~t #
Employee #~ 7
-~ O~S ~R ~~ ~ . ....' ...... '.
Site ~cific T~e Acco~ti~ Sheet
OI ~ Site ~cific S~s ~es:
~o~ee S,~t=e Q~--------
Site Name or Address~ ~/
Funding (Local, ~t~e~ of Federal)
Date ~eegOry 'Activity ';: Hours
Code Description (lOths)
Dal~ Entered By: ' Date:
lC/~C! 2/ C.O. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET ....................................................
!trait =_._.~_O_j_~ .... .Employee Name and ~_._'~_~t2/~_~'~_~__Z. .......... Si'~_ opecific Status Changes (Describe Below)
:~. ,~,. o~ ~d~__.~O~pg~ ...... - .......................................................
................................ - .......................................................
~nd~ {Lo~, S~ or ~d.~,~) ..... ,~~ ........................... ~ .......................................................
Ca~. Activity Hours
ate ICode ICode lOescriDtion of Activity I(.lO's) ~
ores ..~ ~ ..... ~ ~ '
....................................... ~__~[2~z_~ .......................................................................
." C.O.L.T. SITE4~CIF]C TIME ACCOUNTIN6 SHEET
:~.~ ~:':u~..~____ ~o~. ,.. ~..~__L~_~a_n .................. :___
're Na. or Address__~_~E__:~~ ..........................
,ndtng (Local, Stat~ oP F~eP,I)__~_~ ....................
ICat. IActiv~ty I
)ate {Code ICode lDesc~iption of Activtty i[.~u s? [
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (12/88)
~ONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAk~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit #
Employee
Employee Signature ~
Site Name or Address ~p~
Funding (Local,~tate~ of Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:
Cat~egory Activity Hours
Date ~o~e Code Description ( lOths )
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SIIEET
..... ....
~, ~,,, o~ ~_.~x;__.~_~~____~_ ........................
Employee$ignatu~_~_~~__~ .... .............
:unding (Local, StatJ, or Fedepal)
Cat. Activity [Description of Activity
Oate Code Code
~at~ [nt~e,d 8g .......................... ~t~ ........................
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Employee # "-'7
Employee Signature ..-"'-%
Site Name or AddresS:/'i//),%~f--. /--~:. , ~ ,' ,~
. . ......?]-'~ ...........
(Local, ~(E~'-~ O~ ?~era:l.)
Fu.p~i~g
Site Specific Status Changes:
Daye ~eegOry Activity Hours
Code Description (10ths)
Notes:
1~00[~ C.O.L.1. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET ....................................................... ,
~it ~t__~)..~j~J_L~ .... Employee Name and fl__L~_~_F~t~j~_j_K~)_j__~_ ........... Site Specific Status Changes (Describe Below)
: Name or Addres,__-~.~___ ...... ' .....................................................
~,~,~._~.~~- .... ~Y~_~ ........................
oyeeS
'.lng (Local, State, or Federal) .... ~ ...........................
,.j
Hours
Cat. Activity )Description Activity
a Code Code of (. lC's) I
---~,~'_--~--: ...................... -~';-'-~'~---T ........ -. ............................................................................
.......... ~l-Z ...... I .............. ~>-~ ...... ~Y-~ .... ~_~_zz~, .... F_ ....... ~_~ ........................ I ...........
,ed By Date
)~O~/.Zf C.O.L.T .... rE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET ....................................................
=. ~_~_~_~y.~ ..... Employee Name and ~___~.~.~Z~K'J_~j._~_ ......... Site Specific Status Changes {Describe Below)
~loyee S~gnatur __ _ ............................
Hours
Date
:~ered By ...........................................................................................
/~O(:)IZ/ C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TINE ACCOUNTING SHEET
'ermJt =_..~..~..0_~(:~!~___ Employee Name&Number-----Ls~-~]J/'~]--~t----'L ................
unding (Local, State, or Federal).__y,O.~~ ..................
Cat. Activity I IU~, I
Date ICode ICode IDescription of Activity II.~u sj I
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Data Entered By .......................... Date ........................
C.O.L.T. ' ' SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET
Permit 0 .... ~y¢~.~___ Employee Name & Number ...... ~_.~_,~/~Z~jKT__~'~__y__~_ .............
Site Name or Address .... ~_~,==__ .......................................
Employee Signature ~ .............
.....................................................................
ICat. f/~ctivity {H'ours
Date ICode JCode IDescription of Activity ~(.lO's) i
_~_~_~.~____~, ;-~__~_____~c~_~_:_:__ ....................... :__ ........................................ ~_ ........... ._
__~: ....... =,~ .... , .... : ........ : .... _,_ .... ~,_,~___~.'~~___~.__.~_____~__~_~~.__:~ ....
_~____~x~__~ ..... ./~__c~_,,¢~___: .......................................... ' .........................................
Data Entered By Date
-3O
BAKERSFIELD
FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDU, M
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 31, 2002
David Lyman, Principal Planner
Ralph E. Huey, Director of Prevention Services
Environmental Evaluation of Former Hopper Property at 3Ol Espee St'
We have completed a limited evaluation and records review of the property located at 301 Espee Street,
former location of the Hopper Steel Company. The property does not appear on any California of
Federal Clean-up Site lists. However, records from the Kern County Environmental Health Department
indicate several instances of alleged hazardous waste violations and complaints during a ten year period
between 1982 and 1992, as well as approximately 10,000 to 17,000 cubic yards of subsurface petroleum
contaminated soil from leaking underground storage tanks remains at the site without benefit of a
previously required health risk analysis, groundwater monitoring, or any other remedial activity.
Documents obtained through the Kern County Health Department (KCHD) include:
4/29/82 KCHD Complaint Form: "Hopper .Steel solvent being dumped on ground & into
sewer...' (Nothing further in the file to document results of complaint investigation).
10/24/88 KCHD Memo describing violations concerning illegal underground storage tank (UST)
abandonments, falsifying records, known leaking UST's, and improper disposal of hazardous
wastes.
11/20/90 KCHD Notice of Violation and Order to Correct for hazardous waste violations.
2/9/90 Site Characterization Report indicating that the former UST's on site had leaked fuel as
deep as 60 feet below the surface and quantified that between 10,000 and 1'7,000 cubic yards of
subsurface soils were impacted with concentrations avera~ng 5000 mg/kg.
5/14/90 KCHD letter to Hopper requiting a groundwater monitoring well to be placed on site,
andTHealth Risk analysis to be performed to determine if the contamination may be allowed to
remain in place without any adverse affects. There is nothing in the records to show that a
monitoring well was installed or Health Risk analysis performed. After two years of no interim
correspondence in the file, a different KCHD staff person proposes case closure to Hopper, who
responds favorably, and is then issued a completion of the site investigation letter on January 2,
1992.
3/4/91 KcHD summary of investigative actions concerning hazardous waste and request to file
complaint against Hopper Inc.
June 1992 Kern County District Attorney Complaint for Permanent Injunction, Civil Penalties
and Other Relief. (Nothing further in file to document results of Complaint).
Alan Tandy
Ron Fraze
Kirk Blair
RES .iJRCE MANAGEMENT AC c2 ICY
RANDALL L. ABBOTT
DIRECTOR
DAVID PRICE !II
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Envb'onmemaJ Health Senaces Depanmem
STEVE McCAI 1 Fy', REELS, DIRECTOR
Aiz Pollution Control District
WILLIAM J. RODDY, APCO
Planning & Development Services [k, pamnent
TED JAMES, AlCP, DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
January 2, 1992
Mr. Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA 93303
SUBJECT:
Location
Known As
Permit #
301 Espee Street, Bakersfield, California
Hopper, Inc.
060014
Dear Mr. Hart:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above Site. With
the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of
existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health
and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it
relieve you of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions
at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to
water quality or public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further
site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this
agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
If you have any questions regarding this m~itter, please contact Joe Cafias at (805) 861-3636,
Extension 588.
r
Chris Burger,
Hazardous Materials Specialist IV
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JC:jrw
(canasXhopper. b)
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861.3636
SINCE 1914
INC.
June 10, 1991
Joe Canas
~hvironmental Health Services Dept.
2700 "M" Street
Suite 300
Bakersfi,~ld CA 93301
Dea~ Joe:
After our discussion and with B.S.K.'s site characterization that indicates
the threat to the environment is minimal, this letter will confirm Hoppert,Inc.'s
desire for a no action plan for the 301 Espee St. site.
I am also working on getting a contractor to perform a site characterization
on 311 Kentucky Street sitet and I will be in contact with you concerning that
property.
Sincerely,
Tom Hart,
Plant Manager
301 ESPEE STREET · P.O. BOX 2900 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93303 · PHONE [805) 861-7000 · FAX [805) 861-7117 ~,
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
RANDALL L. ABBOTT
DIRECTOR
DAVID PRICE 111
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Environmental Health Sevic~ Department
STEVE McC~t ~ Fy, REHS, DIRECTOR
WlU. JAM J. RODD¥, APCO
Ram~r~ & [:)~v~lo~s~t Sev~s Dc~artm~
TED JAMES, ~, D~R
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
May 13, 199!
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA
93303
SUBJECT:
Status Report for the Hopper, Inc.
Espee Street Site
Dear Mr. Hart:
It has come to the attention of this Department that no'action
has been taken since August 1989 towards remediation of
contaminated soil at the above-mentioned facility located at 301
Espee Street in Bakersfield, California.
The site characterization identified contamination to an
approximate depth of 60 feet and 50 to 60 feet laterally.
Subsequent correspondence received after performance of the site
characterization indicated that a "no action" option for mitigation
was desired, however, a final decision has not been received. We
are now requesting that a final mitigation decision be determined.
In the event the "no action" method of mitigation is selected, the
threat and protection of the environment and public health must be
addressed.
Should you have any questions regarding this notice I may be
contacted at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
e Canas
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JC:jg
~.M ,,~,,, e-r~cc~- ct I,~ 9~ ~AW~D~TCT r~ ~A! 1~RNIA q.qR~l (805) 861-3636
· GARY J. WICKS
Agency Dlreclor
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
DI,ector
RESOURCE ~iENT.
DEPARTS:MENTAL
January 16, 1990
2700 M Street, Sulle 300
Bekerlfleld, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3638
Telecopler (805) 801.3429
AGENCY
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. 0. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA
93303
Subject: Site Characterization
Location: 801 Espee Street, Bakersfield, CA
311 Kentucky Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit #: ~..and-~2..~,
Dear Mr. Hart.'
This Department has received the site characterization reports prepared by
BSK and Associates for the above referenced facilities. In October of 1989, Mr.
Joe Canas from this Department discussed with Mr. Mark Millard of BSK that
additional information was necessary in order to complete the review of the site
characterization reports. Specifically, the following information was to provided
in an addendum to these reports:
A discussion of why the sample borehole locations were changed from
those approved in the site characterization workplan.
A feasibility study for each of the remediation alternatives. At a
minimum the study should contain the information required in the
enclosed handbook UT #35, included should be a risk and cost analysis.
The environmental contractor should also recommend the remediation
alternative best suited to this site, taking into account the
information addressed in the feasibility study.
Upon further review of these reports there are other areas which must be
further addressed in order to complete this review. They pertain to the Espee Site
and are as follows:
Why was boriug B-3 terminated at 26 feet? The levels of contamination
found in B-3 far exceed the levels detected at a similar depth in the
boring B-2, ,hich was drilled to a depth of approximately 70 feet.
e
Why were samples not retrieved at the termination depths of B-4 and B-
5? The last samples retrieved from these borings both show high levels
of contamination. The levels of contamination found in both B-4 and
B-5 far exceed the levels detected at similar depths in boring B-2.
Tom Hart
January 19, 1990
Page 2
This report makes the statement "On the basis that the 350 and 550
gallon fuel tanks are the point sources of the subsurface
contamination..." Are there other possible sources for the
contamination? If 'so, they should be addressed.
The addendum containing the above information must be submitted to this
office within 15 days, so that we may complete our review.
If you should have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Janis Lehman
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:cas
\hart.ltr
OUR JOB B88325
SOIL CONTAMINATION
CHARACTERIZATION
301ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BSK
& Associates
BSI(
Associates, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
SEP 1 4 1989
'" PPER,
September 7, 1989
OUR JOB B88325
Hopper, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California 93303
Attention: Mr. Tom Hart
SUBJECT:
Soil Contamination Characterization
301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
In accordance with our agreement, we have performed a
characterization of soil contamination at the Hopper, Incorporated
facility at 301 Espee Street in Bakersfield, California.
This assessment, based upon a total of six test borings and
chemical analyses of soil samples obtained from five of those
borings, provides an indication of the extent of soil contamination
at the site. The accompanying report summarizes our field work,
and presents the results of the analytical testing and our
conclusions.
If you have questions regarding the information contained in this.
report, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
. MilwA~rd ~
· Moo~e, ~r.
Engineer ~
Soil Engineering* Engineering Geology* Engineering Laboratories* Chemical Laboratories
Fresno, California 93706
Fresno, California 93706
Visalia, California 93291
Bakersfield, California 93304
Pleasanton, California 94566
1645 "E" Street,'Suite 105 * Telephone (209) 485-3200
Fax (209) 485-7427
1414 Stanislaus Street · Telephone (209) 485-8310
808 E. Douglas Avenue * Telephone (209) 732-8857
117 "V" Street * Telephone (805) 327-0671
5729-F Sonoma Drive * Telephone (415) 462-4000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SITE DESCRIPTION
FIELD INVESTIGATION
SOIL CONDITIONS
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING
CONCLUSIONS
REMEDIATION
LIMITATIONS
Page
1
2
2
4
4
5
6
8
10
APPENDIX "A"
FIGURE 1
FIGURES 2 through 7
TABLE I
TABLE I I
TABLE III
- Laboratory Soil Test Results
ILLUSTRATIONS
- Site Plan
- Test Hole Logs
TABLE
- Preliminary Soil Test Results
- Preliminary Soil Test Results
- Laboratory Soil Test Results
BSK
& Associates
Soil Contamination Characterization
Hopper Industries
301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
INTRODUCTION
Hopper Industries was directed by the Kern County Environmental
Health Department (KCEHD) to perform a site characterization to
identify the extent of soil contamination resulting from
underground fuel tanks leakage.
Two previous preliminary investigations, related to the directed
work, were conducted by BSK & Associates (BSK) concerning soil
testing beneath underground fuel tanks following their removal.
The initial investigation (OUR JOB B88325, dated February 27, 1989)
involved obtaining soil samples from depths of 2 and 6 feet beneath
350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks at the site. Information concerning
past uses and the type fuels contained in the two tanks was
unavailable.
Soil samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-Diesel
(TPH), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-Gasoline (TVH), and for
Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene (BTXE).
Results of the February 27, 1989 testing indicated the presence of
chemical constituents in the soil samples characteristic of
commingled gasoline and diesel products. Test results are
summarized in Table I.
Another preliminary soil contamination investigation (OUR JOB
B88325, dated July 21, 1989) involved obtaining soil samples
following removal of two 10,000 gallon gasoline fuel tanks and a
dispenser island in the immediate vicinity of the previously
removed tanks (Figure 1).
Preliminary test results for that investigation indicate little or
no detectable levels of hydrocarbon constituents in the soil
samples obtained from beneath these fuel tanks. Analyses of the
samples obtained beneath the dispenser island, which was located
adjacent to the 350 and 550 gallon tanks, indicated concentrations
of hydrocarbon constituents. The test results are summarized in
Table II.
BSK
& Associates
Page 2
SITE DESCRIPTION
The Hopper plant site is located at 301 Espee Street in
Bakersfield, California. The plant serves as Hopper's metal
fabrication facility and machine shop. The project site is
situated at the south-central end of the plant.
At the time of this site characterization, the surface area over
the removed tanks had been backfilled with imported soils. The
remainder of the site was paved with asphaltic concrete.
In the vicinity of the project site, scrap and fabricated metals
were stored, as well as paints and solvents used in a nearby Hopper
painting booth.
Underground improvements located beneath the site area include a
Pacific Gas and Electric main trunk line, minor electrical and
water conduits, and a sewer line.
A Southern Pacific Rail line is situated south of the site,
adjacent to the Hopper property boundary.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
Our field investigation was performed on August 1 and 7, 1989.
Test Boring B-1 was drilled in an effort to determine the
existence of shallow groundwater beneath the site. Prior to
drilling B-i, a test hole permit was obtained from the KCEHD.
The boring was situated approximately 200 feet east of the
suspected area of contamination and drilled to a depth of 100 feet
beneath the ground surface. Saturated soil conditions were not
observed in the drill cuttings returning to the surface and
subsurface waters were not indicated with a water-detecting
transducer lowered into the borehole by cable. Soil samples were
not obtained from Test Boring B-1.
Test Boring B-2 was located over the approximate former location
of the adjacent 350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks to assess the
vertical extent of soil contamination. Soil samples were initially
obtained from a depth of 10 feet and proceeded at 10-foot intervals
to a depth of 60 feet and subsequently at 5-foot intervals until
the boring was terminated at a depth of 71 feet.
A portable photoionization detector (PID) was used at the site to
screen soil samples and assist in determining qualitative
indications of hydrocarbon contamination.
BSK
& Associat_-ek
Page 3
Test Borings B-3 and B-4 were located approximately 25 and 40 feet
southeast of Test Boring B-2 to assess the lateral extent of soil
contamination in that direction.
Test Borings B-5 and B-6 were located about 50 and 65 feet
southwest of B-2 to further assess lateral extent of soil
contamination in that direction.
Drilling was performed with a truck-mounted continuous flight auger
drill rig using 8" hollow stem augers. The augers act as
continuously advancing steel casings preventing test holes from
caving in above the levels to be sampled. The samples were
obtained by lowering a 2-inch inside diameter sampler containing
stainless steel liners, inside the hollow stem auger, and driving
it into undisturbed soils.
The sampler was cleaned with Liquinox, a surgical grade
biodegradable detergent, and rinsed with distilled water between
sampling activities. The hollow stem augers were steam cleaned
prior to entering the site and between borings to prevent cross-
contamination.
The drill drew consisted of a driller and a helper. The field
investigation was supervised by a geologist who was responsible for
the field boring logs, recording of field conditions, soil sample
handling and preservation, Chain-of-Custodydocumentation, and the
field equipment cleaning process.
Samples were collected intact in stainless steel liners. The
samples were capped with aluminum foil, then with pressure fitted
plastic caps, and sealed.with adhesive tape.
Each sample was labeled with an adhesive-backed label including
boring designation, depth of sample, and initials of the individual
preparing the sample. The samples were stored in insulated chests
with "Blue Ice" and delivered within 24 hours from the time of
sampling to BSK State-certified Laboratories in Fresno for testing.
A Chain-of-Custody form was prepared which recorded names of the
individuals collecting, transferring, and analyzing the samples.
A copy of the Chain-of-Custody document is included in Appendix
Bore hole cuttings were stockpiled at the site for eventual
disposal by the owner. The test borings were grouted with a
sand/cement slurry consisting of 7 sacks of Portland Cement per
BSK
& Associates
Page 4
cubic yard of volume. Backfilling of Test Boring B-1 was witnessed
by Mr. Dan Starkey with the KCEHD.
SOIL CONDITIONS
Soils in the vicinity Of the project site are classified as
Quaternary alluvium. The soils consist of alluvial fan deposits
composed of non-uniformand discontinuous lenses of fine and coarse
grained sediment.
Soils encountered during the field investigation consist of 2 to
6.5 feet of sandy fill overlying interbedded layers of variable
mixtures (sand, silt, clay and gravel).
Particularly stiff and gravelly soils were encountered at depth in
Test Borings B-2 and B-4, resulting in auger refusal.
Soil cuttings and undisturbed soil samples obtained from the test
borings were observed by the site geologist for obvious hydrocarbon
staining and odor. The soil samples were further screened with the
PID for indications of hydrocarbon contamination.
The dark gray color of the soils encountered in Test Boring B-2 may
be a result of residual hydrocarbon staining. Petroleum odor was
initially detected from Test Boring B-2 at an approximate depth of
7 feet and continued to about 65 feet beneath the ground surface.
Test Hole Logs, shown in Figures 2 through 7, should be consulted
for more detailed subsurface conditions. The logs contain both
factual and interpretive information. Horizontal lines,
designating the interface between materials encountered, represent
approximate boundaries. Transitions between soil layers may be
gradual.
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Based on information derived from the 1989 Kern County Water Agency
(KCWA) Water Supply Report, an unconfined groundwater aquifer may
be encountered at an approximate depth of 175 feet beneath the
ground surface of the site.
The 1988 KCWA Water Supply Report indicated that a shallow perched
groundwater zone may be encountered at the site at a depth less
than 20 feet beneath the ground surface. However, the shallow
groundwater zone is notably absent in the 1989 KCWA report.
BSK
& Associates
Page 5
Discussions with KC"WA geologists indicate that this absence is due
to differing geologic interpretation of the same data. KCWA
piezometer control is particulary scarce in this area.
Groundwater was not encountered in the test borings to the maximum
explored depth of 100 feet.
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed by BSK & Associates Laboratories
in Fresno, California. Selected soil samples were analyzed for the
presence of TPH, TVH, and BTXE.
Chemical tests on the soil samples were conducted in accordance
with the following listed methods:
Constituents
TPH
TVH
BTXE
Test Metho~
DHS (recommended procedure)
EPA 8015M
EPA 8020
Test results from this assessment are included in Appendix "A" and
summarized in Table III.
BSK
Associates
Page 6
CONCLUSIONS
Results of our assessment suggest that the maximum depth of
measurable concentrations of TPH and TVH occur less than 60 feet
below the ground surface. Relatively minor concentrations of the
more mobile aromatic petroleum constituents (BTXE) apparently
migrated farther downward to a depth less than 70 feet.
The lateral extent of TPH and TVH concentrations may be less than
40 feet eastward from the original source, as suggested by the
absence of those constituents in the tested samples from Test
Boring B-4. However, the lateral extent may be less than 65 feet
westward, as indicated from the tested samples obtained from Test
Borings B-5 and B-6.
Test Boring B-i, drilled to determine the existence of shallow
groundwater beneath the site, did not encounter saturated soil
conditions. In the absence of any further data, depth to first
groundwater is believed to occur about 175 feet beneath the ground
surface as reported in the 1989 KCWA Water Supply Report.
BSK's analysis of the TPH chromatograms indicate that the tested
soil samples contain significant amounts of lower molecular weight
hydrocarbons (ie. gasoline) that are not necessarily~ well
quantified by the TPH method. This. suggests that the main
contributory source for soil contamination was the gasoline storage
tank. Measured concentrations from the TVHanalyses may be a more
reliable indication of the actual hydrocarbon contamination.
Regulatory agencies require that remedial action must be taken when
concentrations of hydrocarbon constituents in soils exceed the
maximum allowable levels. For purposes of preliminary assessment,
maximum allowable levels of BTXE and TVH in soils can be estimated
using the Leaching Potential Analysis outlined in the Leaking
Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) Field Manual: Guidelines For Site
Assessment, Cleanup and Underground Storage Tank Closure published
by the State of California Water Resources Control Board.
In the Leaching Potential Analysis procedure, the following
characteristics of the site are evaluated for downward migration
potential of contaminants:
1. Depth of groundwater from the soil sample.
2. Subsurface fractures.
3. Annual precipitation.
BSK
& Associates
Page 7
4. Man-made conduits.
5. Nearby wells and existence of coarse soil.
Each characteristic is scored on a scale quantifying low (10
points), medium (9 points), or high (5 points) potential for
leaching. The sum of the scores provides an appraisal of site
characteristics. Based on the total score, a set of allowable
levels of BTXE and TVH can be obtained.
Conditions at the site are listed and evaluated as follows:
Site Condition
Correspondinq Score
1. Depth to groundwater from the 10
contaminated soil sample is
about 105 feet.
2. No fractures in subsurface. 10
3. An annual precipitation of less 10 //w'~ /v-~%~
than 10 inches. ~
4. No man-made conduits. 10.-
5. Coarse soil. Total 499L ~~~
At the subject site, soils with a TVH level higher than~mg/kg
would be considered excessive of current allowable levels assigned
by the Leaching Potential Analysis. Maximum levels of Benzene,
Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene would be 1, 50, 50, and 50 mg/kg,
respectively. However, based on informal conversations with KCEHD
officials, action levels required for remediation by Kern County
could be higher than the aforementioned concentrations should the
contamination pose no significant risk to human health or to
groundwater.
Test results from our assessment (Table III) indicate that the
current concentration action levels are exceeded in the tested soil
obtained from Test Boring B-2 to a depth of at least 50 feet.
Additionally, the maximum allowab ' e excee
or equaled in the~a~_~p!e ~.obtained from Test
the 30-foot sample obtained f~6m'B-5'~ .......... ~
BSK
& Associates
Page 8
REMEDIATION
Tests performed in conjunction with this assessment indicate
concentrations of primarily gasoline contaminated soils which may
extend as deep as 60 feet over an area of some 7600 square feet,
and possibly greater, for an approximate volume of almost 17,000
cubic yards. ~,.:,~,
On. the basis~that the~350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks are the point
sources of subsurface contamination, the test results from the
lateral Borings B-4 and B-5 suggest a non-radial contaminant plume
at the site. Prior. to remediation, it would be advisable to
further delineate the lateral boundaries of the soil contamination.
Additional costs for' site investigation may result in substantial
savings in site remediation.
In compliance with the KCEHD Site Characterization and Site
Remediation Handbook #UT-35, two remedial action options plus a "no
action" alternative will be adressed for this particular site.
No Action ~ ' 0: ~,'~.' ....
A "no action" option may be considered for this site. The leaking
sources have been removed. Based on the reported depth of
groundwater and the current vertical depth of soil contamination,
as well as the other factors identified in the Leaching Potential
Analysis, the risk of ~pact to groundwater ~ality is low.
If a no action option is chosen, we would suggest that the
backfilled area and surrounding areas be paved to insulate
of cont~ination from activities on the surface and r~ the
risk to h~an health. ~,~ ~N ~~
Excavation "'~J, u", '.' .... ~ ,
This alternative would consist of excavating and selectively
stockpiling cont~inated soils for either disposal to a suit~le
site, or on-site bioremedial "land faming".
Excavation of contaminated soils from depths of 60 to 70 feet may
prove difficult because of the near presence of buildings, above
and below ground structures, and the relatively cohesionless
character of the native soils. A braced vertical excavation and
the use of a clam shell excavator would be necessary. A series of
large diameter overlapping bucket auger drill rig holes could be
BSK
& Associates
Page 9
considered as an alternative provided temporary steel casings are
used to stabilize each hole until backfilling.
Depending on the residual concentration of hydrocarbons in soils,
disposal of contaminated soils to a Class I disposal site could
cost as much as $250 per cubic yard.
On-site bioremediation of the Contaminated soils may be considered,
where the excavated soils are continuously tilled and treated with
bacteria and nutrients until the hydrocarbon concentrations are
lowered to a level acceptable to a Class II landfill. Estimated
costs for on-site bioremediation generally range from $45 to $60
per cubic yard. A Class II landfill may charge an additional
amount for acceptance.
Soil Ventinq
Soil venting may be accomplished at the site by placing slotted
well casings in borings throughout the zone of contamination. The
casing is attached to an air pump which then evacuates the soil
gasses into either the atmosphere or to a carbon filtration system.
Volatile hydrocarbons may be reduced to acceptable levels without
excavation using this method. Soil sampling would be necessary
throughout the program to monitor the residual levels of
contamination until they meet regulatory requirements. This option
would also require approval bythe local Air Quality District prior
to implementation.
Depending on the extraction systems used, a soil venting
remediation program could range in cost from $50 to $150 per cubic
yard.
BSK
& Associates
Page 10
LIMITATIONS
The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on
data obtained from the test borings shown on the Site Plan (Figure
1), and the soil sample analytical test results. The report does
not reflect variations which may exist between borings and sampling
points. Such variations cannot be anticipated nor may they be
entirely accounted for in spite of exhaustive additional testing.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
engineering practices for the area, based on the guidelines of
local and State jurisdictions. No warranties, either expressed or
implied, are made.
BSK & Associates
BSK
& Associates
TABLE I
LABORATORY SOIL TEST RESULTS
(Performed by BSK &Associates Laboratories in conjunction with the
removal of 350 and 550 gallon underground fuel storage tanks,
reported February 27, 1989).
Total Ethyl
Tank Depth TVH TPH Benzene Toluene X¥1ene Benzene
350 2' 5800 24000 48 68 120 32
350 6' 3400 4300 22 65 160 59
550 2' 12000 7400 33 47 130 55
550 6' 13000 7000 29 38 120 49
Ail concentrations in mg/kg
TVH = Total Volatile Hydrocarbons (Gasoline)
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Diesel)
BSK
& Associates
TABLE II
LABORATORY SOIL TEST RESULTS
(Performed by BSK &Associates Laboratories in conjunction with the
removal of two 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks and a
dispenser island, reported July 21, 1989).
Location Total Ethyl
Tank & Depth TPH TVH Benzene Toluene X¥1ene Benzene
Unleaded A-2' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Gasoline A-6' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Tank B-2' 1100 2200 2.3 60 120 37
B-6' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Leaded C-2' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Gasoline C-6' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Tank D-2' ND ND ND ND ND ND
D-6' ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dispenser E-2' 13 ND ND 0.05 0.16 ND
Island E-6' 4900 730 4.7 10 29 12
All Concentrations reported as mg/kg
ND= None Detected
BSK
& Associates
TABLE III
LABORATORY SOIL TEST RESULTS
(Performed by BSK & Associates Laboratories in conjunction with
this Soil Contamination Characterization conducted at Hopper
Industries; 301 Espee Street Bakersfield, California).
Test Boring
& Sample Depth
Total Ethyl
*TPH TVH Benzene 'Toluene Xylene Benzene
B-2-10' 3400 2400 6.8 8.5 21 11
B-2-20' 7800 5000 0.88 1.3 28 6.6
B-2-30' 6000 9300 0.03 0.5 27 7.1
B-2-40' 3300 4700 3.4 7 21 9.3
B-2-50' 3300 5600 0.18 4 19 6.8
B-2-60' ND ND 0.21 0.57 0.44 0.09
B-2-65' ND ND 0.15 0.14 0.08 ND
B-2-70' ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-3-25' 4800 4400 2.2 2.2 22 5.9
B-4-25' :ND ND 0.03 0.06 0.08 0.02
B-4-30' ND ND 1.5 1.6 0.89 0.14
B-5-30' 650 1000 6.6 7.7 1~ 12.2
B-6-30' ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-6-40' ND ND ND ND ND ND
B-6-50' ND ND ND ND ND' . ND
*These tested samples contain
molecular weight hydrocarbons
quantified by this method.
significant amounts of
that are not necessarily
ND = None Detected
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Diesel)
TVH = Total Volatile Hydrocarbons (Gasoline)
lower
well
BSK
& Associates
HETAL
FABRi C~.T 1ON
YARD
PG&E
UNDERGROUND
LINE
! ! REHOVED
N./ 10,~00 Gal.'"'
/
L__I ,
~,~.,B.-2 '~ ,--- _
'~ REb[OVED
,(~ B-4
DI SPENSER
AND TANKS
OUR JOB B88325
August, 1989
Figure 1
~.;.~ ,. '..' ~
PAINTING AND
STEAM CLEANING
BUILDING
~;--- UNDERCROUND CONDUIT
B-1
(Approx.
1,,=2 ,
Scale: 0
SITE PLAN
SOIL CONT~{INATION CtlARAC%ERIZATION
HOPPER, INCORPORATED
301 ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
BSK
& Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS -FR~S.O ·
',TE: 8-1-89 TEST HOLE LOG
~GGED BY: HFM
E-~EVATION: B--1
"',TEll LEVEL: NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED. JOB: 888325
]UIPriENT: MOBILE 8-50 B-INCH HOLLOW STEH AUGER FIGURE: 2
= ~ ~ ~ z ,~ ~ SOTL OB BOCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
0 2" AsphaJtJc Concrete
SH SILTY SAND: brown; fine; dry. (Fill)
SP SAND: dark yellowish brown; fine to medium;
slightly silty; dry.
5 -
J
SH S]LTY SAND: dark brown; fine to medium; dry,
10-
J SP SAND: yellowish brown; fine to medium;
micaceous; dry.
IlS-
SP GRAVELLY SAND: yellowish brown; fine to
J medium sand; fine gravel; micaceous; moist.
J HL j SANDY SILT: yeJtowish brawn; fine; slightly
20- i J clayey; Iow, olastlc[ty; soft:, moist. I
I I '
I
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT BE REPRE£~NTAT]VE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
.OCATIONS AND TIMES,
BSK
& Associates
TEST HOLE LOG
B-I (CONTINUED)
JOB: B88325
PAGE 2 OF4 FIGURE: 2
v . ~ = '~ ~ SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
i ML CLAYEY SILT: brown; occasional fine' sand;
I low to moderate plasticity; moist,
] I i sP SAND: yei!owish brown; fine to medium;
s!ight!y silty~ micaceous; moist,
35 ! fine gravel; moist.
I
'! I i ML ~' CLAYEY SILT; brown; trace of fine sand;
, ~ ! !ow plast;c;tyi soft; ~o~st,
] J SM SILTY SAND: brown; fine to medium; occasiona!
' [ : fine gravel~ micaceous~ D~oist,
404
' i ML CLAYEY SILT: brown; trace of fine sand;
; [ occasional fine gravel; iow plasticity;
, soft; moist
EE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
.~CATZCNS AND TIMES.
BSK
& Associates
TEST HOLE LO6
-- l:l-1 (CONT.INUED)
JOB: B8@325
PAGE 3 OF4 FIGURE: 2
'~ W SOIL OB ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
58 ' ML CLAYEY,' SILT; brown; trace of f~ne sand;
I low plasticity; f~Fm~ moist.
I 55~ SC CLAYEY SAND: br~wn; f~ne; slightlF s~tty;
I
~ , low p!ast~c[ty; firm; mO[St.
75-
BSK
iHS OESCBIBEO SOIL ~u~u;..CN:; MAY NOT 8E mcmRmq:Nf,~TfV~ OF THOSE AT CZFFERENT
.OCATE ONS AND
& Associates
TEST HOLE LO6
6]-1 (CONT]NUED~
PAGE 4 OF 4
JOB~ 888325
FIGURE: 2
A
Terminated
Associates
THE OE~.flJB_D SO!L CONDITZONS.MAv. N.~ :.c... .,~.~c~cccU*~T*VE.,~oL.,,,.~.: OF THOSE AT DZFFERENT
)CATZCN£ AND TJMES.
SC
SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION
CLAYEY SAND: brown~ fine to medium;
occasional fine to coarse grave ; low
piasticity; frm; moist,
CLAYEY SZLT: brown; trace of f ne sand;
Iow to ~oderase o!asticity; firm; moist,
CLAYEY SAND: brown; flne; fine to coarse
gravel; Iow plastlclty; firm; ~oist.
NOTES
BSK
ATE: 8-!-B@ TEST HOLE LOG
DGGED BY: HFH
-~.LEVATION: ~--2
"ATER LEVEL: NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED°
~OIP~ENT: MOBILE B-58 B-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGE~
S
JOB: 888325
FIGURE: 3
10-
i2,0
20-
NOTES
Photoionization
Detector
. (PID) ,
616
SP
HL
50IL OR .ROCK DESCRIPTION
SAND; yellowish brown; fine; moist, (Fill)
SANDY SILT; dark gray; fine; petroleum
odor; moist.
SAND: dark ye!lowish brown; fine; micaceous;
petroleum odor; moist,
8SK
& Associates
SILTY SAND: dark gray; fine; micaceous;
oetroleum odor; moist°
SANDY SILT: brown; fine; slightly clayey;
oetro[eum odor; moist,
I 25 ~ ~ ,
T~£ OESCa~BED SOIL CCND~T~gNS ~AY NIl BE ~EP~ESENTAT~VE DF THDSE AT D~FFE~ENT
_.OCATIONS AND
587
TEST HOLE LOG
~]-2 (CONTINUED)
~OB: BB8325
PA6E 2 OF3 FIGURE: 3
~ = = ~ ~ z '* ~ SOIL OB ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
~ ·
2S HL CL. AYEY S!LT~ brown; trace of fine sand; Iow
plasticity; soft; petroleum odor; moist,
I 5P SILTY SAND: brown; fine to medium; petroleum
t odor; moist.
I 381 SP SAND; ye!!owish brown; fine to medium;
PID
2°0 ? Petroleum odor; moist, 648
I
SP SILTY SAND: brown~ fine to medium;
I petroleum odor; moist,
35-i
I ..
i
-~ ~L CLAYEY SILT: brown~ fine sand; Iow
I . plasticity; soft; petroleum odor; moist.
'1
i2.0 ? SP SILTY SAND: yellowish brown; fine; 565
t petroleum odor; moist,
I
I
45'i SC CLAYEY SAND: brown; fine; silty; Iow
I . plasticity; firm; petroleum odor; moist,
I 50 l; !,t Occasional fine to co~rse gravel,
THE DE$CR!IaED SOiL CL: :TT,.qS HAY NOr BE REPflESENfA.TIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT BSK
.OCAT~ONS AND TIHES.
& Ass~ciate~
TEST HOLE LO(]
B-2 (CONTINUED)
JOB: BB9325
PAGE 3 OF3 FIGURE: 3
SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOfES
SILTY SAND: brown; fine to medium; slightly 523
clayey; petroleum odor~ moist.,
GRAVELLY SAND: brown; fine to coarse sand;
fine to coarse gravel; angular~ hard; slight 340
petroleum odor; dry,
Augerat 71 'Refusal
BSK
THE DESCRTSED SOTL CONDZT."ONS MAY NOT BE REP~ESENTATTVE OF THOSE AT DIFFE.~ENT
.,2CATIONS AND TZrlES.
& Assnciates
,TE: ~-7-8g TEST HOLE LOG
_JGGED BY: MFM
ELEVATION: B-~
~TER LEVEL: NO G.~OUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED, JOB: 888325
)UIPMENT: CME 75 8-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER FIGURE: 4
'c ~ == ~ ~=" d SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
0 I I 2" Asphaltic Concrete
· I SM SILTY SAND: olive brown; fine; micaceous;
dry, (Fill)
t SP SAND: yellowish brown; fine; occasional fine
to coarse gravel; micaceous; moist,
I '
I 4 SP SAND; yellowish brown; fine; occasional fine Ph°toionization
] to coarse gravel; micaceous; moist. Detector
1S XL/HH CLAYEY SILT: brown; trace of fine sand; 0
12,0 27 moderate plastlcity; firm; moist
I
~ Petroleum odor at 22'
i
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
OCAT!ONS AND TIMES.
8SK
TEST HOLE LOG
-- 8-3 (CONTINUED>
JOB: 888325
PAGE 2 OF2 FIGURE: 4
SOIL OR BOCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
PID
CLAYEY SILT; brown; trace oT Tine sand; 568
moderate olastici~x~oetroleum odor; moist,
Boring Terminate~
at 26 ft.
,
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
.OCAT!ONS AND TIMES.
BSK
& Assoc Jat.~ =
TE: B-7- 9 TEST HOLE LOG
]GGED BY: MFM
-E-LEVATI ON: B-4
"~TER LEVEL: NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED. JOB: B88325
~)UIPMENT: CME 75 B-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER FIGURE: S
~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
I0 I 2" Asphaltic Concrete
SM SILTY SAND: olive brown; fine; micaceous;
dry, (Fill)
I S - ML SANDY SILT; brown; fine; slightly clayey;
micaceous; dry.
I i SP I SAND: yellowish brown; fine; slightly silty;
10 micaceous; dry,
i Occasional fine to coarse gravel at
:ML/MH CLAYEY SILT: brown; trace of fine sand;
I moderate olasticity; firm; moist,
: S~ SILTY SAND: yellowish brown; fine; micaceous;
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
.OCAT!ONS AND TIMES.
BSK
& Associates
TEST HOLE LOG
-- 8-4 (CONTINUED)
JOB: B8832S
P^6E 2 OF2 FI6URE: S
SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
SAND; yellowish brown~ f~ne; m~c~ceous; 133
s~ht petroleum odo[~
CLAYEY SILT; brown; trace of fine sand;
moderate plasticity; slight petroleum odor;
moist.
106
Occasional fine to coarse gravel.
at 44
THE DESCR.I:tED SOIL CONDITIONS MAY NOT 8E REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
T '"'
.OCAT_ ON= AND
BSK
ATE: 8-7-89 TEST HOLE LOG
OGGED ElY: HFH
ELEVATION: B--5
ATER LEVEL: NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED. JOB: BElB32S
.QUIPIIENT: CPIE 75 B-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER FIGURE: 6
~ = ~ = = '~ J SOIL DE ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
jO SM SILTY SAND: olive brown; fine; micaceous;
dry. (Fill)
HL SANDY SILT: brown; fine; micaceous;
J j slightly cJ~yey; moist,
1 i~p SAND: yellowish brown; fine; slightly
J 15i silty; micaceous~ dry.
i
20-:
i
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS 1AY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
LOCATIONS AND TIHES.
BSK
& As$oc lares
TEST HOLE LOG
I]-5 (CONT]NU£D)
JOB: B88325
PAGE 2 OF 2 FIGURE: 6
SOIL OR ROCK DESC.RIPTION NOTES
SANDY SILT: yellowish brown; fine to medium;
micaceous; petroleum odor; moist,
Photoionization
Detector
350
Baring Terminated
at 41 ft.
THE )ESCRZBED SO!L CONDZTIONS HAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DZFFEBENT
LOCATIONS AND TIHES.
BSK
ATE: B-7-Bg TEST HOLE LOG
.OGGED BY: MFM
ELEVATION:
ATER LEVEL: NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED. JOB: 888325
QUIPMENT: CME 75 8-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER FIGURE: 7
= = ~ = z ~ ~ SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
I 0 SM SILTY SAND: olive brown; fine; micaceous;
dry. (Fill)
i ML SANDY SILI: brown; fine; micaceous;
, slightly clayey; moist.
10-
S? SAND: yellowish brown; fine to medium;
slightly silty; micaceous; dry.
15-
-,
1
20-!
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS HAY NOT 8E REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
LOCATIONS AND TIMES.
BSK
& Associates
TEST HOLE LOG
- B-6 (CONTINUED)
JOB: 888325
PAGE 2 OF 2 FIGURE: 7
v ~ ~ ~ ~ z ,. d SOIL OR ROCK DESCRIPTION NOTES
25 J SP SAND: yellowish brown; fine to medium;
J j slightly silty; micaceous; dry.
I
HL SANDY SILT: broun; fine; occasional fine Photoion~zat]on
to coarse grave]j slightly clayey; firm;
, Detector
~ moist.
' (PID)
2,0
'
' i SC CLAYEY SAND: yellowish brown; fine to medium;
J I J slightly silty; occasional fine gravel; iow
· !I plasticity; firm to hard.
J 4o- i 0
2,0 37
I
I
452 ! I
J ,
I
t ~ Boring Terminate~
I
I S0 i2'0/34 j , ~ ~ ~t Se ~t.
THE DESCRIBED SOIL CONDITIONS HAY NOT BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE AT DIFFERENT
_OCATIONS AND TIMES.
BSK
& Ass~ciates
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
$ mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1213 hrs.
B-2-10'
Lab No. Ch892405-1
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89 .
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(rog/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 6.8 0.02
Toluene ................... 8.5 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 11 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 21 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 2400 10.
Hethod: 8TXE-EPA 8020 TVN-EPA 8015H
ND-None Detected BDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
Q~C S~per~
/~gan~sor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
:' ~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1225 hrs.
B-2-20'
Lab No. Ch892405-2
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.88 0.02
Toluene ................... 1.3 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 6.6 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 28 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 5000 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
DLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
1489
~g~~visor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 ~, Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
~- :mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1310 hrs.
B-2-40'
Lab No. Ch892405-4
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for B TXE and TVH 11
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DAR)
Benzene ................... 3.4 0.02
Toluene ................... 7.0 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 9.3 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 21 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 4700 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
489
'~rganics )ervisor
BSK
& Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
$~ mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1245
B-2-30'
hrs.
Lab No. Ch892405-3
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH I
Compound Results Detection
(rog/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.03 0.02
Toluene ................... 0.50 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 7.1 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 27 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 9300 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
89
upervlsor
BSK Assoc,ates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
S- mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1345 hrs.
B-2-50'
Lab No. Ch892405-5
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received' 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.18 0.02
Toluene ............. 4.0 0.02
Ethylben~'~.. 6.8 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 19 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 5600 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-BeLow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
O' ~89
sor
BSI~. & Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
f Lmple Type Soil
Sample Description 1430 hrs.
B-2-60'
Lab No. Ch892405-6
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received~ 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results .Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.21 0.02
Toluene ................... 0.57 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 0.09 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...~.. 0.44 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Hethod: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
0 ¢89
isor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
~' Lmple Type Soil
Sample Description 1510 hrs.
B-2-65'
Lab No. Ch892405-7
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.15 0.02
Toluene ................... 0.14 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. ND 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 0.08 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
OLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
o 489
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
~ mple Type Soil
3ample Description 1640 hrs.
B-2-70'
Lab No. Ch892405-8
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/4/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... ND 0.02
Toluene ................... ND 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. ND 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... ND 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TV~-EPA $015M
ND-None Detected ,SDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
7 89
QA/Q~Supe~'
BSK ^ o ,ates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
I ~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1213 hrs.
B-2-10'
Lab No. Ch892405-1
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/10/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3400* 10
Method: TPH OHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of'lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons% that are not necessarily
well quantified by this method.
~,070489
gan~isor -
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1225 hrs.
B-2-20'
Lab No. Ch892405-2
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/10/89
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 7800* 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-BeLow Detection Limit
DLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of'lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons', that are not necessarily
well quantified by this method.
Q A/,Q Sup or
r~anics ~~isor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
~mple Type Soil
~ample Description 1245 hrs.
B-2-30'
Lab No. Ch892405-3
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/10/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 6000* 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note:
This sample contains signifiCant amounts of'lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons: that are not necessarily
well quantified by this method.
)489
QA/~ Supervi~
/O/~an~cs ~ervisor
BSIZ Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
F-~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1310 hrs.
B-2-40'
Lab No. Ch892405-4
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/10/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3300* 10
Method: TPH DH$ GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of'lower
molecular weight 'hydrocarbons~ that are not necessarily
well quantified by this method.
1489
Q~ Supe~
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
:' ~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1345 hrs.
B-2-50'
Lab No. Ch892405-5
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/10/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3300* 10
Method: TPH D~S GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-gelow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of~lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons~ that are not necessarily
well quantified by this method.
0 ~,89
Organics S.upervisor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 4§5-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
-'ample Type Soil
Sample Description 1430
B-2-60'
hfs.
Lab No. Ch892405-6
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/3/89
Soil Analyses for TPH II
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
R070489
QA/~ Supe~
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325 Lab ,No. Ch892405-7
Report Date ,, 8/15/89
~mple Type Soil Date Sampled 8/1/89
R~mple Description 1510 hrs. Date Received 8/2/89
B-2-65' Date of Analyses 8/3/89
Soil Analyses for TPH II
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/F[D
ND-None Detected BOL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
489
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Ind.
B88325
:--~mple Type Soil
Sample Description 1640 hrs.
B-2-70'
Lab No. Ch892405-8
Report Date 8/15/89
Date Sampled 8/1/89
Date Received 8/2/89
Date of Analyses 8/3/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
:Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method:. TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BOL-Betow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
¢89
QA/Q~ ~u~e ls~~
Log Numoer ~-- :. ~" t..., ,-,NAL .... REQ--- f/CE ..... DF
Client Name-~- / -'~ Project.;_, ~.'..';er P.O.,.z..) -? ~, Analysis required
section
City, State, Zip -- J Report, attention _
Number Lab Sample
Date Time Type of Sample Seals
sampled Sampled See key
below) Sample description ;ontainers number (See key
below) Remarks
,' /
IMPO~ANT NOTICE: No samples will be analyzed without an aulhorized ~ignalure in lhis section.
I am hereby requesting BSK's Normal Chain~f~usl~y P~c~dure8 for lhe above samples. I undersland lhm I am hereby requesting BSK's ~rmal Chain~l~ust~y Pr~edures for the a~ve ~mples. I unde~nd lhat
the~ pr~edures are ~enerally consistent wilh those outlined in the U.S.E.R~. ~ 846 and that there is no mese pr~edures are generally consistent with those oullined in U.S. EPA ~ntracl ~r~to~ Pr~r~ Stale-
merit of Work, 8eclion F, and that there is a charge of $50.~ per work order or $5.~ ~ ~tlle, ~ichever is
extra charge for this se~ice. ~/~~(~ ~/ greater.
.~ By:
By: . . ~th~ized Signature ~thorized Signature
' Signature Print Name Company Date Time
Relinquish~ by
Received by
Relinquish~ by
Receiv~ by
Associates Chemical Laboratories
1414 Slanislaus Street Fresno, California 93706
Telephone (209) 485-8310 · Fax (209) 485-7427
KEY:
Type: AQ.-Aqueous SL-Sludge SO-Soil PE-Petroleum eT-Other
Seals: P-Present A-Absent B-Broken
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE, CANARY - LABORATORY PINK - ORIGINATOR
Note:
Samples are discarded 14 days after results are reported unless other arrangements are made.
Hazardous samples will be returned to client or disposed of at client expense.
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~'.mple.Type
Sample Description
B-3-25'
Soil
0930 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-1
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received' 8/10/89
Date of Analyses .8/&4/89
II Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH II
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 2.2 0.02
Toluene ................... 2.2 0.02
Ethylbenzene 5.9 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 22 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 4400 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015H
ND-None Detected BDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
OLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
489
BSI( Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
S mple Type Soil
S~mple Description 1020
B-4-25'
hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-2
Report Date 8/24/89
Date~Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/.14/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and T~ [[
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 0.03 0.02
Toluene ................... 0.06 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. 0.02 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... 0.08 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Bekow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
~89
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~- tmple.Type
Sample Description
B-4-30'
Soil
1030 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-3
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/15/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH II
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 1.5 0.02
Toluene 1.6 0.02
Ethylbenlg~g'[[[[][[[[[[[[[ 0.14 0.02
!Total Xylene Isomers ...... 0.89 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10..
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-Hone Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
OLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
489
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 · Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~ tmple 'Type Soil
S~mple Description 1300 hrs.
B-5-30 '
Lab No. Ch892503-4
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/15/89
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... 6.6 0.02
Toluene ................... 7.7 0.02
Ethylbenzene ....... 12.2 0.02
Total Xylene ~i~ .___.. 16 0.02
Total Volatile HydrocarbOns 1000 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected 8DL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
489
BSK Assoc,ates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~ tmple Type
S~mple Description
B-6-30'
Soil
1430 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-5
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received' 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/15/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ........... ; ....... ND 0.02
Toluene ................... ND 0.02
Ethylbenzene ......... ND 0.02
Total Xylene ~me~ ND 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
DLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
0 489
~i=s S~ervisor
BSK ^ o ,ates
(~hemical Laboratories
1414 Stani$1aus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
: ~mple~Type Soil Date
S%mple Description 1440 hrs. Date
B-6-40' Date
Lab No. Ch892503-6
Report Date 8/24/89
Sampled 8/7/89
Received 8/10/89
of Analyses 8/15/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... ND 0.02
Toluene ................... ND 0.02
Ethylbenzene .............. ND 0.02
Total Xylene Isomers ...... ND 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-BeLow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
~489
BSI( Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax {209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~' tmple Type
Sample Description
B-6-50'
Soil
1455 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-7
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8~15/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Benzene ................... ND 0.02
Toluene ................... ND 0.02
Ethylbenzene ............ ND 0.02
Total Xylene I~omers .... [. ND 0.02
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND 10.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVfl-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BOL-Be[ow Detection Limit
" OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
0 489
c~upervisor
BSK
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~mple.Type
Rample Description
B-3-25'
Soil
0930 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-1
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 4800 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
DLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of lower
molecular hydrocarbons that are not necessarily well
quantified by this method.
Orgln~erVisor
BSI( ^ oc,ates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street , Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~mple'Type
~ample Description
B-3-25'
Soil
0930 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-1
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 4800, ,. 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-Hone Detected SOL-Se[oN Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
Note:
This sample contains significant amounts of lower
molecular hydrocarbons that are not necessarily well
quantified by this method.
/ /O~g~n~/Supervisor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (~Espee)
: ~mple'Type Soil
Sample Description 1020
B-4-25'
hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-2
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received' 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8A14/89
[[ Soil Analyses for TPH []
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH OHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BOL-Betow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
~070489
Org~rvisor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * TelePhone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
:-'~mple.Type Soil
Sample Description 1030
B-4-30'
hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-3
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8~14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/F[D
ND-None Detected BDL-Betow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
1489
BSK ^ o ,ates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street · Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~mple Type
Sample Description
B-5-30'
Soil
1300 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-4
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 650* 10
Methed: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Be[ow Detection Limit
OLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
*Note: This sample contains significant amounts of lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons that are not necessarily well
quantified by this method.
,~070489
~r~ani~upervisor
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
~mple Type
Sample Description
B-6-30'
Soil
1430 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-5
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8/.14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
NO-None Detected BOL-Be[ow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
· ?070489
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
ample Type Soil
~ample Description 1440
B-6-40'
hfs.
Lab No. Ch892503-6
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date'of Analyses 8~14/89
Soil Analyses for TPH II
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-Hone Detected 8OL-Betow Detection Limit
DLR-Detection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
~070489
BSK Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 StanislaUs Street * Fresno, California 93706 * Telephone (209) 485-8310 * Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Industries
B88325 (Espee)
-'~mple Type.
Sample Description
B-6-50'
Soil
1455 hrs.
Lab No. Ch892503-7
Report Date 8/24/89
Date Sampled 8/7/89
Date Received 8/10/89
Date of Analyses 8~14/$9
Soil Analyses for TPH
Compound Results Detection
· (mg/kg) Limit
(DLR)
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND 10
Method: TPH DHS GC/FZD
ND-None Detected BOL-Betow Detection Limit
OLR-Oetection Limit For the Purposes of Reporting
:070&89
QA~ S~pe s~~
Address I Phone # In this / / /
Sam~ ~
sam~ sampled ~ ~ * ~ ~mple ~als
~) Sample de~n ~alne~ num~ (~ k~
.~) / / /+-~/ R...<
~/ , ,
'~7 ~4-3,~ s~"~3-~,- '~o /-~ ," ~'
/~4.~' .~ -'
,I
I~PO~Bt ~OTIgE: ~o sam~los will bo anal~ed wilhool an aulhoriz~d si~nalum in Ibis s~ion.
Ih~so pr~or~ nm ~on~rallT ~nsl~enl wilh lhoso oullined In lbo ~.S.E.EA. ~ ~ and lhal Ihom Is no lh~so pr~d~ms ~m ~on~rallT ~nstslo~l wilh lhoso oulltn~ In U.S. EPA ~onlm~ Lnbomlo~ Pr~ram
m~nl ol Work, S~lon ~, nnd Ihal Ihom Is · cha~ ol $~.~ per ~ ordor
:/'--2-,-'>'- ,. ... "' '
BSI( & Associates Chemical Laboralories
1 !nisla~ .'1 F :alifc 1706
KEY:
Type: AO-Aqueous SL-Sludge SO-Soil PE-Petmleum OT-Olher
Seals: P-Presenl A--Absenl B-Broken
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE, CANARY - LABORATORY PINK - ORIGINATOR
Note:
Rnmnles am discarded 14 days after results are repoded unless other arrangements are made.
...... dous; ,_.., s will 'ned t, or di,'. of al, <pens,
2700 M Street
Baker~fieM, California
Mailing Addre~:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
~RN COUNTY HEALTH .DEPARTM
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebeftlon, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reich-,rd
0{37
OWNER'S NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
DATE: 7-~/~
FACILITY LOCATION: ~Ot
DRILLING METHOD: l~
TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S)
NUMBER OF WELLS REOUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY: ~'~___'~ ~
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT:
i. Well site aoproval is reouired before beginning any work related to weil construction. It is unlawful to continue
work oast the stage at which an insoection is reouired unless insOection is waived or como)eted.
2. Other reouired insoections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features.
3. A ohone call to the Deoartment office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 2¢ hours
before the olacement of any seals or olugs.
4. Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Oeoartment representatives.
5. Any misrepresentation or non-comoliance with reouired Permit Conoitions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a
"3too Work Order."
5. A cody of the Department of Water Resources Oril!er's Reoort as well as cooies of logs and water guality analyses
must be submitted to the Health Deoartment within 14 days after comole~ion of the work.
?. A well destruction aopiication must be filed with this Deoartment if a well is being destroyed that is not in
conjunction with a test hoie oermit.
8. The oermit is void on the ninetieth (90) calengar day after date of issuance if work has not been started ano
resonab)e orogress toward comotetion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
9. I have read and agree to comoiy with the General Conditions noted above.
Soeciai Conditions: t. Aooroved Annular Seal Deoth ~ /~..
This oermit must be signed Dy either the contraC[or or owner.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE JOAT
PERMIT APPROVED BY: ~ ~
DATE: ~--~l~(~'~ -
CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE
DISTRICT OFFICES
DATE
2700 M Street
Baker. field, California
Mailing Addre~:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
RN COUNTY HEALTH.DEPARTMIJ
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
MONITORING WELL(S) PERMIT
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M HebMt~om, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon $. Reich-,rd
OWNER'S NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
OATE:
FACILITY LOCATION:
DRILLING METHOD:
TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S)
CONTRACTOR: LICENSE
NUMBER OF WELLS REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY:
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT:
Well site aoproval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue
work past the stage at which an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or comoieted.
2. Other required insoections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features.
3. A ohone call to the Oeoartment office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours
before the olacement of any seals or olugs.
Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Oeoartment reDresentatives.
5. Any misrepresentation or non-comoliance with required Permit Conqitions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a
"Stoo Work Order."
6. A cody of the Oepartment of Water Resources Driller's Reoort as well as cooies of logs anU water quality analyses
must De submitted to the Health Department within 14 days after comoletion of the worK.
?. A well destruction aopiication must be filed with this Oeoartment if a well is being destroyed that is not in
conjunction with a test hole :ermit.
8. The, oermit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date of issuance if work has not been started and
resonable progress toward comoletion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
9. I have'read and agree to comply with the General Conqitions noted above.
Special Conditions: 1. AD:roved Annular Seal Oeotn
This oermit must be signeo bV either the contractor or owner.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
PERMIT APPROVED 8Y:
OATE:
OATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE
DISTRICT OFFICES
GARY J. WICKS
Agency OIr~¢tor
(805) '861.3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOU
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
DEPARTM~~~.iqMENTAI-
MONITORING WRI.L(S) PERMIT
2700 M Strut, Suite 300
Bekeml~kl. CA 93301
Telephon~ (80S) 861-3~__'Y~_
Telecopler (805) ~el.342g
A.G.E N C.Y
PERMrr- MW0137-06
0138-045
OWNER~J NAME: Hopper Industries
FACILITY NAME: Hopper Industries
FACILITY LOCATION:
DRILLING METHOD:
CO~R: B.S.IC & Associates
· ~,~£ OF MOmTOR~G w~u.(s) Test Holes
NUMBER OF %~P.~TJ_~ REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY:
DATE: 7-31-89
301 Espee Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
Hollow Stem Auger
uc~'~s~. ~: 490942
(2) Two
GENERAL CONDrllONS OF THIS PERM]T:
Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which
an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed.
Other required inspections include: conductor casing, ali annular seals, and final construction feature.
A phone call to the Department office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours before the placement of
any seals or plugs.
Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives.
Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a ~TOP WORK ORDER."
A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well aa copies of logs and water quality analy~es must be submitted to the
Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work.
A well destruction application must be files with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit.
The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date if isauance if work has not been started and ~nable progre~ toward
completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1.
2.
Approved Annular Seal Depth N/A.
Test holes shall be sealed with approved material from bottom to grade.
This permit must be signed by either the contractor or owner.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE
'7.,'~ / '
CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE
PF. RMIT APPROVED BY: Dan Starkey
DATE: 7-31-89
DS:ed
$tarkeyNhopper.mw
~700 "M~ Street, Suite 3410
Bakersfield, CA 9330!
(~0~
(805) 8~1-3429 Fax Number
COUNTY OF KERN
Environmental Health Services Department
July 14, 1989
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
Subject:
Underground Storage Tank Leak Investigation
301 Espee Street, Permit
311 Kentucky Street, Permit ~rl'4/
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
This Department has reviewed the recently submitted site characterization addendum
prepared by BSK and Associates for the above referenced facility.
The site characterization workplan in conjunction with this addendum is acceptable for
the initial investigation of this area. This office must be given 48 hours advance notice of sample
retrievals.
After ail samples have been retrieved and lab results obtained, a final report must be
submitted to this Department characterizing the full extent of contamination, and suggesting three
mitigation alternatives. This report must be submitted to this Department within 30 days after
the receipt of all laboratory results.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-B636.
Sincerely,
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:cas
~· .~70OFe *' - . -~- , OUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME ,a~ omCER
;,.Bakersfield,Califomle oUAR* O 1
Telephone (805)861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
EK,nvimnmental Health Div. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENI~,L HEALTH
: era County Health Oept ~m~
Facility Name . Kern County Permit
address~/ _.,~"'..~'",,'~~~ .i
* * IffiDERGROUND T;U~IK DISPOSITIO~ TR~CKING RgCORD *
This form is to be returned to the Kern County Health Department within 14
days of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling .facility. The
holder of the permit with number noted above is responsible for Insuring
that this form is completed and returned.
Section I - To be filled out by tank removal contractor:
Tank Removal Contractor:
zip.
Date TanksRemoved No. of Tanks
Section 2 - T__qo b__e fll!ed out by contractor "decontaainatlng tank(s):
Tank "Decontamination" Contractor H & H Ship Service Company
Address 220 China. Basin Street "~ ' Phone # (415) 243-4835
San FranG£sco~ CA Zip 94107
Authorized representative of contractoF' certifies by signing below that
tank(s) have been decontaminated in accordance with Kern County Health
Department requirements.
CLEVELAND VALREY Q.A. & Safety Coordinator
Slgnature Ti t le
Section 3 -To be filled out and signed by an authorized representative of the
treatment, storage, or disposal facility accepting tank(s):
Facility Name H & H Ship Service Company
Address 220 China Basin Street
San Francisco_. CA
Date Tanks Received 15 February 1989
Signature CLEVELAND VALREY
(Authorized Representative )
Phone # {~1~) ~nq-4835
Zip 94107
No. of Tanks Two (2)
Title Q.A. & gaf~.~y ('~ra~nator
' Fold in half and staple. Postage and mailing
MAILING INSTRUCTIONS:
label have already been affixed to outside for your convenience.
Form #NM3~P-150)
DISTRICT OFFICES
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
Hopper, Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS:
Hopper, Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
Phone: (805)-861-7000
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF
~ TANK(S) AT ABOVE
LOCATION
PERMIT EXPIRES
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
CONTRACTOR::.. '"
Hopper,';. inc-~ '
30i Espee. St. -"
Bakersfield~:,' CA~.'
Llcense;~:-#Owner.~,~~
Phone.~..- '.'(' 805~86;1'~7000
~: :' :'. '..
APril 9, 1989-'. '>"
· ~ [-E'.~-" 'h .'~.
January-'9, :1"989`
................................ POST ON PREMISES " '
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: " '-'-' ' '
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to-obtain permits)which'may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning,':work.. :.'"-':
2. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit'prior to~ initiating
closure action.
3. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Health and-.FireDepartment
approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30'
4. Soil Sampling
Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents to. be
sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT-30 must-receive
prior approval by the Health Department. -'.
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or less) - a minimum of two'samples must be
retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately
two feet and six feet.
5. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those liSted on permit
and permit application are to be utilized,.prior approval must'be granted
by the specialist listed on the permit. "
6. Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run. and also near the
dispenser area(s). ' · ._
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline/diese.li-.'samp..'iieS~t,
benzene, toluene, xylene, and total '~etro~e~:~'
both a gasoline a diesel standard) ~'.-."'."... '/::.:> ...... ..7'..
for
(using
10.
Copies of transportation manifests must -'be:-..s~ :~:.Health
or treatment must-be adhered to. The Kern'
be notified before moving and/or disposing~--o'f~;:any:~con.tam~:~d[l~[Soi~'i.~..:F
time and da~e of-:..the :'.W~ :24
Results must be submitted to this office?wi~thin~:~
11,
12,
ACCEPTED
SL:cd
14 days of tank removal.
Advise this office of the
hours advance notice.
(janis\854-06.pta)
PE T. FOR.'PERHAHENT CLOSURe..
UNDERGROUND HAzARDous' ·
SuBSTANcES' STORAGE FAOILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
Hopper', Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
PERMIT F0R GL0SURE OF
~ TANK(S) AT ABOVE
LOGATION
OWNER ( $ ) NAMK/ADDRESS:
Hopper, Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
Phone: (805)-861-7000
PERMIT EXPIRES
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
,54£06
PhOne:. ~'('805~)':~ 861 ~ 7000
POST PREMISES ": ' '
2.
3.
4.
' "" .:' 'i ... '-,:!~'".".?-', ' '
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: .' ,..
It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permi'~s~!~iCh:.may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to'beginning work'.:.'.':.-
Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit'.prior.to 'initiating
closure action. .. :.....
Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Health.and Fire:DePartment
approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30
Soil Sampling ' ' ....-.'.. ·
Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents-, to be
sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT;30'..~USt receive
prior approval by the Health Department
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or less) - a minimum of tWo.samples must be
retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of:approximately
two feet and six feet. ..
If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those-lis.ted on permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must.~e' granted
by the specialist listed on the permit· "'~"
Soil Sampling (piping area) ~u--...~
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run.and-also near the
dispenser area(s)·
Sample analysis
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline
benzene, toluene, x¥1ene, and
both a-gasoline & diesel standard).-. '
Copies of transportation 'manifests must ....
Department within five.'days of waste
All applicable state laws for hazardous
or treatment must be adhered to. The Ker~'
be notified before moving and/or dis
Permittee is,responsible for making sure
record" issued with this permit is p'roper'l~fi~l
14 days of tank removal
Advise this office of the time and date
hours advance notice. .'.
Results must be submitted to this office,,':.w~thi:
completion.
10.
11.
12.
ACCEPTED. BY:
SL:cd
(janis\854-O6.pta)
/Health
FACILITY NAIVE/ADDREss,
Hopper, Inc..
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
Hopper,
30! Espee St. " ".'.-...3. O.I.'-':"ESP~e:~'S~"!L :'.i. ~ '"
.. Bakersfield, CA,-: " -
. ·
-. ' ."' '
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES · .
2., TANK ( S ) AT-ABOVE APPROVAL DATE"
' ' ' '' ' ' /
LOCATION ,.. APPROVED
· . - . /! · · San~s·~hman.v:,:~:~,~,~:~,~,. ~ a -.::, ..
................................ POST ON PRF~TS~-S .........
CONDITIONS,' AS FOLLOWS: ' ' ' .
1. ' It. is the.responsibility of the Permittee ,to obtainqpermits~.;.wh'tch may, be
required, by other regulatory agencies prior-, to'
2. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit pr,i0r~-,to 'i~tiating
closure action.
- · . ..
~, Tank closure ~ctivities must be per Kern County Health and.:Flr, e~Depar~ment
approved me~hods as described in Handbook UT-30
4 Soil Sampling .
deviation from sample locations and nUmbers.:'~r.-cOnsti.~Uen~s~.'.to'..be
Any.
sampled for which are described below and. tn Handbook:.'UT~SO.'~?us~..' meceive
prior approval by the Health Department. . '. "-[..
a. (Tank size 1,000 gallons or less) - a minim~ of
retrieved beneath the center of the tank a~' depths of'.aPproxima~ely
two feet and six fee~.
5. If an~ contractors or disposal facilities other than those.:lf'~.tedon permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval m~K.be, granted
by the specialist listed on the permit.
6. Soil Sampling (piping area) :' "' :'~":"-
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths, of-,.~PP~pXlmately .two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe-,run and~(.also.near.the
dispenser area ( s )
i0.
benzene.,~-,..'.toluene::,-x¥1ene, and tot~!~"
_both~'a~gaSoI'!ne~.&.~diesel standardi~'''
Copies 'of '~'transPo. rtation manifests must:~,~
DePartment within"five~.days of waste dis' ~
Ail applicable, state laws for hazardous':,~a~t
or treatment.must.be adhered to. The
be notified,.before..moving and/or disPosing:~
Permittee'~!.'is.'resPonsible for making sure.,;'~:~:
record".!sSued'wi'th;t~.is.perm!t is prope~
14 days'of...tank removal.
Advise this. office of the time
hours'advance noti.ce%
Results"must-be submitted
completto~;'
~CCEPTED
IL:cd
~,. ja~is \ 854-06 . pta')
and date',',
to this of
i~Hea-l,th
-.must
F,.qN COUN,"~, HEALTH DEPAR.TN~NT
rViSlON OP ENVIRONNKNTAL H~ALTIf
?OO PLO~dER STREET. BAKERSFIELD. CA
905) 881-3838
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTF
THIS APPLICATION
L~TR OP PIPIN~ TO ~
APPLICATION FOR P~RMXT FOR
CLOSURE/ABANDONI~ENT OF UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSIdeNCES STORAGE ~ACILXTY
~RENOV~. OR D AAANDONN~,NT IN P~CE (rILL o~r ONJ ~PLIaTIM P~
PROJECT CONTACT[]PHONEDAyS- ~ 861-7~'8/~ [SEC/T/R (RURAL ~TIONS ONLY)
I
PACJLI~ N~E ~DR~S g~ ~gS
~O~P~ [~C ~0[ ~P~ 5T ~ON A~
O~ER ~DRESS PHONE
HOPP~ INC 301 ~P~ ST ( 805) 861 - 7000
TANK RENOVAL CONTRACTOR [ADDRESS IPRO~
HOPPER INC I 301 ESPF33 ST. (805 ) 861 - 70OO
PRO~S~ PROJE~ ~ARTING ~ ~LIFORNIA LICENSE · ~RK~'S C~P~SATION ~ INS~
PRELI~INARY'~.SITE ASSESS~ ~R ADDR~S PHONE
B~ ~SOCIAT~ 117 V ST B~FI~D CA 9330~ (805 ) 32~067i
~RKER'S C~PENSATION ~ INS~ER PHONE
CP 7533~02 ~us~i~ ~0~ (805 ~ 32~007~
~BORATORY ~T WILL ~AL~E ~P~ ~DR~ PHONK
B~ ~SOCIAT~ 117 V ST ~S~D CA ~330~ (~5 ) 32~O671
CHENICAL CONPOgITION OP MATERIALS STORED
TANK · VOLUME CNEMICkJ~ S~ORED (NON-COmmERCIAL NAME}
i _~ ~ASOLIN~.~ OR DIF~SET, '
z ~ ~ASOLINE OR DIESEL
UNK TO UNK
UNK TO UNK
C~EMICAL PREVIOUgLY STORED
NATER TO FACILITY PROVIDED BY
CAILF WATER SERVICE
NEAREST NATER NELL - GIVE DISTANCE AND DESCRIBE TYPE Ir WITHIN SO~ FEET
~ASIS FOR SOIL TYPE AND GROUNDMATER DEPTH DETERMINATION
IDEPTI! TO GROUNDMATER
UNKNOWN
SOIL TYPE AT fACILITY
SANDY
EXCAVATION
DESCRIBE HOW RESIDUE IN TANK(S) AND PIPING IS TO BE RENOVED AND DISPOSED OP (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COMPANIES):
TANKS AND P~PING TO BE TRANSPORTED UNDER MANIFEST BY KERN BACKHOE TO H&H SHIPYARD IN SAN FR
DESCRIBE BOTII THE DISPOSAL ME'THOD AND DISPOSAL LOCATION POR: TANK(S)
PIPING
· "' PLEASE PROVIDE INPORliATION REQUESTED O.~N REVERSE. SIDE O~ THIS SHEET BEPORE, SUBNITTINO APPLICATION PO~R REVIEM · ·
]'HTS;iGNA,I~R~%~.,~PORN ILa. S BeeN~CONP£ETED ,~PEN~r PERJURY Am TO ~.E BESTTiTLEOr ~V XNOWCEDoEpLANT MANAGERIs TRUe AND CORRECt.
DATE
DEC 22 88
Porm eH14MP-] 40)
..,,O~iDE_ DRAWING OF PHY~,., ;, JT OF FACILITY USING SP,~ JED BELOW.
;ar,r. OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDER FOR APPLICATION If) BE .
PROCESSED:
TANK(S), PIPING & DISPENSER(S), INCLUDING r.k~GTHS AND DIMENSIONS
__ PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATIONS DESIGNATED BY THIS SYMBOL "(~"
NEAREST. STREET OR INTERSECTION
ANY WATER W~r,T.q OR SURFACE WATERS WITHIN 100' RADIUS OF FACILITY
NORTH ARROW
',F '~ST
'0:
:ROM: ~
;ORK TO BE DONE:
Make a file for
Regular Mail
Certified with Return Response
Certified w/o Return Response
Over Nile
Ot~er
Rough Draft (double spaced)
Final (single spaced)
Other
Plain paper
Letterhead
Memorandum
Form {pit, ese include)
8 l/2 X 11
8 1/2 X 14
Ii X 17
Envelopes.:
Regular (return address) envelopes
Large (Manila) envelopes
Enclose a self-addressed stamped envelope
Copies:
Collate
Staple
Paper Clip
Return
__copies to Sender
REMARKS:
Distribute: ..
District Staff
Program Managers
Chiefs
D~E AND TIME NEEDED:
Date Time
DATE AND TIME COMPLETED
a.m. p.m. Date .~//d Time'
/
T:'[l~ IS A HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT
Soil Contaminat
Investigation Aodendum
301Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 5
- Plastic bags for contaminated equipment and clothing.
- Soap or waterless hand cleaner and towels.
- Medical Oxygen for resuscitation purposes.
- Fire extinguisher (alcohol foam, dry chemical or
carbon dioxide).
Decontamination:
The HSO will make arrangements for a temporary decontamination
station at the work site. Soap rinse water and wash pan should
be available. Waste generated from decontamination shall remain
on ;he site and properly disposed by the owner.
Tools and sampling equipment decontamination shall conform to the
procedures outlined in the Groundwater Sampling sections.
Health and Safet~_~~:
Field personnel shall receive health and safety training in the
following topics:
Hazardous Substances in the Field:
- Types and concentrations of hazardous substances known
or suspected at the site.
- Determination of which routes of exposure to avoid for
the waste being sampled and the proper sampling and
protective equipment to be utilized.
- Physiological and behavioral warning signs of acute
toxicity.
- Role of the Site Health and Safety Officer.
- Authority of the HSO.
- Responsibility of each individual to obey the HSO.
Identifying and Avoiding Hazards:
- Monitoring equipment.
- Use of common sense.
- Specific problems on site which should be avoided.
- Maintenance of personnel communication and visibility.
BSK
& Associatt ,-,
Soil Contaminati
Investigation AUdendum
~01Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 6
Use of Apparel and Safety Equipment:
- Respiratory pro~ec~ion: selection, fit, donning and
use.
-Personnel protective equipment.
- Limitations of clothing and equipment.
- Personal hygiene.
- Decontamination of clothing and equipment.
- Disposal of contaminated clothing and equipment.
Prohibited Activities:
- Appropriate conduct of personnel during hazardous waste
site operations.
- Emergency procedures and services.
Refer to the emergency contacts and telephone numbers for
emergency procedures in the field.
First Aid:
The HSO or designated field personnel shall be familiar with
first aid and CPR Topics and Procedures.
Mitigation of Contamination:
The HSO shall enforce procedures to mitigate potential
contamination during field activities. These procedures should
include the following:
- Decontamination of sampling equipment, other equipment
and tools.
- Disposition of decontamination solutions and any other
materials used on sampling and drilling equipment.
- Disposition of wastes and protective clothing.
- Minimization of dust generated from operations by water
spraying of surfaces if this procedure is compatible
with obtaining sample of specified quality.
- Minimization of personnel exposures through the
placement of crew members upwind.
BSK
& Associate-
2700 "M" Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861.3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number
COUNTY OF .. ;RN
Environmental Health Servic,-s Department
Nay 11, ~.989
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P.O. Box 2900
BakersfJ. e]d, CA 93303
Subject:
Underground Storage Tank Leak Investigation
301Espee St., Permit ~-P~Sq-2- ~i
311 Kentucky St., Permit
Bakersfie}d, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
This Department is in the process of reviewing the site
characterization proposal prepared by BSK and Associates. There
are several areas which must be ~urther addressed in an addendum
in order for this Department to complete the review. The areas are
as follows:
It must be further discussed how it is planned to confirm
the presence of soil contaminants possibly due to paint
thinners at the site Jn quest/on.
A detailed discussion on how the samples are to be
selected for laboratory analysis must be provided.
The investigation is being conducted in an area of known
contamination. A discussion of the safety measures that
will be employed to protect personnel must be included.
Contaminated cuttings must be handled per a].]. applicable
hazardous waste laws. 'It must: be stated ho~ these soils
are to be managed.
Tom Hart
Page 2
When this Department receives the addendum to the site
characterization proposal covering the above items, this Department
will be able to complete it's review.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Since~'ely,
s Lehman
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materia].s Management Program
JL:cd
janis\hart.let
5-11-04
BSI(
& Associates, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
May 10, 1989
OUR JOB B88325
Hopper, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
Attention: Mr. Tom Hart
SUBJECT:
Status of Underground Tanks
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
This letter has been prepared to formalize a recent conversation
regarding removal of underground tanks.
It is generally accepted that the ownership of buried single steel
wall gasoline tanks is a significant liability in California. We
routinely advise clients to remove these tanks and replace them
with properly installed double wall tanks.
We have been contracted to determine the extent of known
contamination believed to be caused by underground tanks recently
removed from your facility. Two 10,000 gallon tanks remain at
that location. It is our opinion that removal of the tanks will
facilitate the investigation of the contamination.
You have told us that the County of Kern Health, Department has
indicated a concern for health and safety during removal of the
last two tanks. During a recent visit to the site we noted that
most of the soil had been removed from over and around the tanks.
The excavation has been open for several weeks. RemoVal of the
tanks should cause little additional health risk.
We trust thi's information will assist you in the completion of
this project.
Soil Engineering * Engineering Geology * Engineering Laboratories* Chemical Laboratories
Fresno, California 9370&
: Fresno, Calhornia 9
._ Visatia, Caliiornia 932%
6~ Bakersfield, Califorma 93
.'_] Pleasanton, California
1 ~43 "[" Street, Suite 105
1-114 Staniqaus Street
~'~t)8 E. DougMs Avenue
117 "V" Street
F, 729-F Sonoma Drive
Telephone (209) 485-3200
Fax (209) 485-7427
Telephone (209) 485-8310
Telephone (209) 732-8857
li~lephone (805) 327-0671
Telephone (415) 462-4000
Status of Underg .d Tanks
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB 888325
May 10, 1989
Page 2
If there are questions concerning this matter, or if we may be of
further assistance, please contact us.
JBM/ds
Respectfully submitted,
~/oonn B. ~t)~ory~~, Jr.
iCivil EnginUer
BSK
& Associate~
2?00 '#' Street. Ste. 300
6akersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
KERN
'~,virolmental Health Servicea Dep&Q~,,t
March 30, 1989
Tom Hart
Hooper Inc.
P.O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, GA
93303
SUBJECT:
L0eation 311 Kentucky St., Bakersfield, CA
Known .As Hopper Inc.
PERMIT # 140012
Dear Mr. Hart:
The intent of this letter is to inform you of the necessary deadlines for work
required at the property described above. As a responsible party for a leaking
underground storage tank, you have previously received a letter from this Department
notifying you of the required work necessary to identify the extent of the contamination.
We are now requesting that this work, outlined in UT35, be done in a timely manner.
In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County
Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48, the Kern County Environmental Health Services
Department requires a determination of the threat to the environment. Accordingly, you
must select an environmental contractor and submit a site characterization workplan
proposal to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. The workplan must be
approved by this Department before any work is started.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please immediately contact
me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
(] Janis Lehman
'~' Environmental Health Specialist
JL:dr
ATTACID~ENT "D"
March 16, 1989
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
SUBJECT:
Location: 301Espe~ Street
Bakersfield, California
Known As: Hopper, Inc.
PERMIT #: 060014
Dear Tom Hart:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the Introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained ~elow:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California HaZardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and-oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas
the direct and Indirect costs of overseeing.removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE BI/RI/BY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Ntlon,
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
3.
4.
5.
Nearest surface water in unlined conveyance is within
75 feet of tank(s), or
Nearest agricultural or domestic water well is within
75 feet of tanks(s), or
Facility is located in a designated aquifer recharge
area, or
Permitting Authority determines possible adverse
environmental impact due to facility proximity to unique
wildlife habitat areas.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight
of the work for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action
plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or
permits. These costs will be recovered by Kern County Environmental Health
under the terms of the State contract described below. This contract ONLY
pertains to costs associated with oversight.
STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides
a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County
oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill
the State Water Resources Control Board under'this State contract.
The State will then charge you, a responsible party for both the
costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
Accordingly, Attachment "D", the wlll serve as the official notification of
enrollment into the State Contract.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
(805)
STATE
~arch 16, 1989
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, California .93303
SUBJECT:
Location: 301Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
Known As: Hopper, Inc.
PER~IT #: 060014
Dear Tom Hart:
This letter ts an official notice to inform you that the property described
above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of
an unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank.
This notice ls sent to you because our records lndlcate that you are a
responsible party for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating
to the above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities.
California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code
Chapter 8.48 require a determination of the threat to the environment as a result
of this release. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE
CHARACTERIZATION, FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY
ENVIRON~NTAL HEALTH'S REVIEW ~ APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED.
Enclosed you will find attachment "A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum
required site workplan activities, the necessary requirements for selecting
environmental contractors qualified to perform this work, a glossary of terms,
example illustrations, and a section discussing the'answers to conaonly asked
questions.
According to the criteria listed below and in Attachment "C", your site
has been designated as environmentally sensitive. All environmentally sensitive
sites are automatically enrolled into a State contract program for recovery of
oversight costs. The environmental sensitivity criteria for sites are as follows:
'1. Highest historic ground water ts within'lO0 feet of
ground surface, or
'XJ!nbu! anew no,~ 1! ~! luasaJd pue Jd!aoaJ $!q] 9^8S '9
'LL~ WJOJ ~0 ~ Wail U~ S~OOla alae~ldde
aSJODU~ '~SSSSJppR 8ql 0 iUS~R pezlJoq]ne UR OJ JO 'aSSSaJppe
'J~q~nu 8yJ OJ JusoR[p~
'alo~e ~ql I~em pub 'jd~ao8J
~o ssaJppe uJniaJ ~110 lq~p aqi oi qnis p~n~ ~ ~o~ls 'pa~Je~lsod
{~Jeqo eJ~8 ou}
'J~JJ~g IeJnJ Jno~ oJ }~ pueq Jo Mopu]M aO~M~S ~O.JJO isod e
~U~A~BI SSaJppB uJnJaJ ~j 1o l~J a~l Oj qnls pa~n~ ~1
X
(/7., ?3303
Certified
BSI(
Associates, Geotechnical'Consultants, Inc.
(b''°' O'
February 27, 1989
OUR JOB B88325
Hopper, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
Attention: Mr. Tom Hart
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Soil Contamination Testing
301Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
In accordance with our agreement, we have performed a Preliminary
Soil Contamination Testing at the subject two sites, in
conjunction with the removal of 3 underground fuel tanks.
The project involved obtaining soil samples for chemical testing
from beneath the 350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks at the Espee
Street Site (Figure 1) and beneath a 1,000 gallon fuel tank at
the Kentucky Street Site (Figure 2).
Information concerning the past uses and the type fuels contained
in the three tanks was unavailable prior to the Preliminary
Assessment.
SOIL SAMPLING
Soil sampling was performed on February 14, 1989 in the presence
of Ms. Janice Lehman of the Kern County Environmental Health
Department.
Soil samples were obtained from below the bottom of each tank
excavation at the approximate center of the tank. A backhoe was
used to retrieve a large, relatively undisturbed mass of soil
from depths of 2 and 6 feet below the test locations. A clean
stainless steel tube was driven into the soil mass to obtain the
samples. The samples were capped with aluminum foil and pressure
fitted plastic caps and sealed with adhesive tape. Each sample
was labeled with an adhesive-backed label including sampling
locations, depth of sample, time of sampling, and the initials of
the individual preparing the sample.
Soil Engineering* Engineering Geology, Engineering Laboratories* Chemical La~ratories
~ Fresno, California 93706 · 1645 "E" Strut, Suite 105 · ~lephone (209) 485-3200
Fax (209) 485-7427
._. Fr~no, Cahforn~a 9370b · 1414 Stani~lau~ Street · ~lephone (209) 485-8310
~ ~salia, Catiforma 93291 8U8 E. Dougta~ A~nue · ~lephone (209) 732-8857
:~2 Bakersfield, Cali~rnia 93304 * 117 "V" Street · ~lephone (805) 3274671
:~ Pleasanton, Cali~orma 94566 * 57294 Sonoma Drive * .~lephone (41S) 4624~0
Preliminary Soil : ~.amination Testing
301 Espee Street an 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB 888325
February 27, 1989
Page 2
The samples were stored in an insulated ice chest, packed with
dry ice for preservation, and transported to the BSK & Associates
Laboratories in Fresno, California for chemical analysis.
A Chain-of-Custody form was prepared to accompany the samples
recording the name of the individuals collecting, transferring,
and analyzing the samples. A copy of the Chain-of-Custody Record
is included.
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed by BSK & Associates Laboratories
in Fresno, California. The soil samples were tested for gasoline
contamination indicated by the presence of Total Volatile
Hydrocarbons (TVH), and Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, and
Ethylbenzene (BTXE). Diesel contamination was also tested for
the presence of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons {TPH). The testing
program was detailed by Ms. Lehman (KCEHD).
The tests for TVH and BTXE were performed in accordance with EPA
Test Methods 8015M and 8020M respectively. For TVH and BTXE, the
headspace method was used for sample preparation. In the
headspace method, 5 grams of soil are heated to 90°C. At the end
of one hour, a 1 milliliter vapor sample is obtained and injected
into a chromatograph for aromatic separation. TVH is measured
with a flame ionization detector (FID). BTXE is measured with a
photoionization detector.
The test for TPH is in accordance with DHS-approved procedures
for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. The sample is
prepared by hexane extraction prior to chromatograph separation.
TPH is measured with an FID.
The test results are included and summarized in Table I.
BSK
& Associate,
Preliminary Soil W jmination Testing
301Espee StreetFd 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 27, 1989
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary analytical test results indicate relatively high
levels of the tested constituents in the soil samples obtained
from below the 350 and the 550 gallon fuel tanks at the Espee
Street Site, and below the 1,000 gallon fuel tank at the Kentucky
Street Site.
Chemical analyses of the 2 and 6 foot soil samples obtained from
below the 350 gallon tank indicate the presence of constituents
likely associated with diesel and gasoline.
Chemical analyses of the 2 and 6 foot soil samples obtained below
the 1,000 gallon fuel tank indicate the presence of constituents
likely associated with gasoline and possibly components with
paint thinner-kerosene characteristics.
LIMITATIONS
The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based
on the data obtained from the sampling locations shown on the
Site Plans, and the soil sample analytical test results. The
report does not reflect variations which may exist between
sampling points. These variations cannot be anticipated nor can
they be entirely accounted for in spite of exhaustive additional
testing.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practices for the area, based on the
guidelines of local and State jurisdictions. No warranties,
either expressed or implied, are made.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
Mark F. Milward
Geologist
T n
Civil Engineer
MFM/TWL/ds
Enclosure
BSK
& Associate..
Preliminary Soil Contamination Testing
301Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 27, 1989
Enclosure 1
TABLE I
LABORATORY SOIL TEST RESULTS
Tank Sa le
Site _~j]allons) Nu~er
Espee 350 ES-E
Espee 350 ES-E
,'~pee 550 ES-N
Espee 550 ES-W
Kentucky 1,000 K
Kentucky 1,000 K
2
6
2
6
2
6
TVH TPH Benzene
5,800 24,000 48
3,400 4,300 22
12,000 7,400 33
13,000 7,000 29
8,900 5,900 46
5,600 5,900 18
Toluene
68
65
47
38
7O
54
Total
~ylene
120
~60
130
120
150
130
Ethyl benz erie
32
59
55
49
64
51
All concentrations in mg/kg
Detection limit for TVH:
Detection limit for TPH:
Detection limit for Benzene:
Detection limit for Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene:
1 mg/kg
5 mg/k9
0.02 mg/kg
0.05 mg/kg
F~.bruar¥, 1989
Figure 1
-N-
Scal~: 1"=3'
Location of Soil'
Samples ES-W
2' and 6'
550 Gallon Tank
Lo~ation
350 Gallon Tank
Location
~I,ocation of Soil
~/ ~Samples ES-E
~]2' and 6'
Gas I~land
SITR PI,AN
Preliminary Soil Cnnt~mination Investigation
Hopper Industries
301Espee Street
~akersfie]d, Ca]ifmrn~a
BSK
&Associates CEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS ~.Js,,,o · ws..~,^ . .^~,.s.~to · ~l^s^~,o~
February, 1989
Figure 2
Sca!e:]"=6'
Island
Building
Compressor Pad
!000 Gallon Tank Location
l.ocotion of Soil ,
Samples K-2' and
K-6'
(Above Groun,
Tank. Pads
SITE PLAN
Preliminary Soil Contamination Investigation
Hopper Industries
3!1 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
BSK
1414 Stamslat,s Sir(,et I-re,,no. C,fl~Itm~la 9 ~7~)h T~qvl)hon~, t2(l~.,, 485-8310
Fax 1209) 485-7427
Hopper Lab No. Ch890464-I
B88385
Report Date
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled ~/1A/89
Sample
Description ES-E2 Date Received ~/15/8~
08q? hrs. Date of Analysis ~/~1/8~
Soil Anmlyses for
and TVH
BTXE
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Benzene ~8 .1~
Toluene .............. __ 68 .85
3~ .25
Ethylbenzene __
Total Xylene Isomers 1~0 .~5
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 5~880 5~.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC
Super v i sot
Or gani~/~Supervi sot
BS]{ & Associate~ Chemical Laboratories
Fax {209) 48]-,q_,
Hopper Lab No. Ch8~Oq64-1
BB8385
Report Date 2/27/89
Sample Type__Soil Date Sampled 2/14/89
Sample
Description ES-E2 Date
084? hrs. Date
Received 2/15/8~
of Analysis ~/16/8~
Soil Analyses for TPH ][
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 24,~0~ 1~.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC
Supervisor
~[~rgani s~u~pervisor
- Fax (209) -" '-
.4g~-,
Hopper
888325
Sample Type Soil
Sample
Description ES-E6 Date
~853 hrs. Date
LaD No. Ch89~6A-2
Report Date 2/2?/89
Date Sampled 2/14/89
Received 2/15/89
of Analysis 2/21/89
Soil Analyses for
and TVH
BTXE
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Benzene 22 .10
Toluene 65 .25
Ethylbenzene 59 .25
Total Xylene Isomers __ 160 .25
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 3~0~ 50.
Plethod: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC Supervi
~ganic~upervisor
BS~ & Associates
Cher'nical Laboratories
1414 Stanislaus Street · Fresno, Califorr~ia 937t)~'~ Telephor~e 12tl9~ 485-8310 · Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Lab No. Ch8~464-2
B88325 RePort Date 2/~?/8~
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled 2/14/8~
Sample Description ES-E6
0853 hrs.
Date Received 2/15/8~
Date of Analysis ~/1&/8~
Soil Analyses for TPH JI
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons A.3~ 1~.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC Supervisor
perv i sot
Associates
Chemical Laboratories
1414 SI,mi, au, Street Frt.'s,~: C,IIil'omht 9 '~7()~ Teh,i)i~one (20t)~ 485-8]10 Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper
B883~5
Sample Type Soil
Sample
Description ES-W2 Date
1308 hrs. Date
Lab No. Ch8904&4-6
Report Date 2/2?/89
Date Sampled 8/14/89
Received ~/15/8~
of Analysis ~/22/8~
Soil Analyses for
and TVH
BTXE
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Benzene 33 .1~
Toluene ~? .~5
Ethylbenzene ...... 55 .25
Total Xylene Isomers 130 .25
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 12~000 5~.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8020 TVH-EPA 8~15M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
Organi~s~Supervi sot
QA/QC Supervisor
1414 Nani~l,m- Stl~.'tq I'r.,',~x (',fiilt~m.~ 9'~7tm T,,,iephont. 12091 485-8310 * Fax (2091 485-7427
Hopper LaO No. CHB90464-6
B88385
Report Date 8/87/89
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled 2114189
Sample Description ES-W8
1308 hrs.
Date Received 8/15/89
Date of Analysis 2/1&/89
Soil Analyses for TPH '1[
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ?,480 18.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
Some TPH as gas may be present
QA/OC S!p~er v i so r
Chemical Laboratories
1414 St,mislaus Street Fre,~(~. C,di~'om~a 9.½706 · Telephone (2091 485-8310 · Fax t2091 485-7427
Hopper Lab No. Ch899464-?
B88325
RePort Date 2/2?/89
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled 2/14/89
Sample Description ES-W6
1313 hrs.
Date Received 2/15/89
Date of Analysis 2/22/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE
and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Benzene 29 .19
Toluene - ~38 .25
Ethylbenzene 49 .25
Total Xylene Isomers 129 .25
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 13~099 59.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8080 TVH-EPA 8915M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC Supervisor
Organi~up~rvisor
Chemical Laboratories
1414 St,mi..I.m.. Sm'et Fre..no. C,fli,;rn~a q'~,7()6 Telephone (209~ 485-8310 - Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper
888325
Sample Type Soil
Sample Description ES-W6
1313 hrs.
Lab No.
RePort Date
Date Sampled
Ch890464-?
2/87/8~
8/14/8~
Date Received 2/15/89
Date of Analysis 8/16/89
Soil Analyses for TPH [[
Compound Results Detection
Cmg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 7~000 1~.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
Some TPH as gas may be present
QA/QC Supervisor
Organics Supervisor
fax ~209) 485-7427
Hopper Lab No.
B88325
RePort Date
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled
Sample Description K-2
1212 hrs.
Ch890q6q-q
2/27/8~
2/1~/89
Date Received 2/15/89
Date of Analysis 2/22/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE
and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Benzene 46 .lQ
Toluene 70 .25
Ethylbenzene 6~t.____ .25
Total Xylene Isomers 150 .25
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 8~900 5~.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8~2~ TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC Supervisor
Chemical Laboratones
1414 %t,m,,,I,tu,, .',;Irt,vt Fr~,~,no, C,dil'(}rnia 93706 · Telephone (2091 485-8310 ,, Fax (209) 485-7-i27
Hopper
B88385
Sample Type Soil
Sample Description K-8
1812 hrs.
Lab No.
Report Date
Date Sampled
Ch8~0464-4
2/27/8~
2/14/8~
Date Received 2/15/89
Date of Analysis 2/16/89
Soil Analyses for TPH I!
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons~ 5~980 10.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
Some TPH'as gas may be present
QA/QC Supervisor
"~rgan~Supervisor
BSa{ & Associates
Chemical Laboratorie~
1414 Stanislaus .C, lreet Fresno, Califorma 9370~'~ Telephoto., ~2()c)J 485-~310 Fax ~2UgJ 485-7427
Hopper
888385
Sample Type Soil
Sample Description K-6
1885 hrs.
Lab No.
RepOrt Date
Date Sampled
Ch898q6q-5
8/8?/89
8/14/89
Date Received 2/15/89
Date of Analysis 8/88/89
Soil Analyses for BTXE
and TVH
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg> Limit
Benzene - 18 .1~
5~ .85
Toluene __
Ethylbenzene 51 .25
Total Xylene Isomers 13~ .85
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons 5,600 50.
Method: BTXE-EPA 8080 TVH-EPA 8015M
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
QA/QC Supervisor
~Or g a n~ Supervisor
14t4 ~.l,mt.,i,m. ~I .~'t t'm-.~.~. ().~[.fl~m,~ '~'~7()(~ Tett,pNmt, ~2t)'.:~ 4;t~.5-8310 - Fax (209) 485-7427
Hopper Lab No. Ch8~464-5
B88325
RePort Date 2/27/8~
Sample Type Soil Date Sampled 2/1A/8~
Sample Description K-6
1225 hrs.
Date Received 2/15/8~
Date of Analysis 2/1~/8~
Compound Results Detection
(mg/kg) Limit
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 5~0~ 1~.
Method: TPH DHS GC/FID
ND-None Detected BDL-Below Detection Limit
Some TPH as gas may be present
QA/QC Supervisor
Organi~upervisor
~s~ & ^ssoc~^~s CHAIN. OF CUSTODY'-
Analytical La~oratory
1414 Stanislaus Street RECORD
~RO.J EOT NO. ANALYSES- *". .....
SAMPLER ~;~ ~ ~ g ==" z
~ ~ ( SAMPLE PRESERVATION,
~ HANDLING PROCEDURES,
[Slgnatu gi ~ o o ~- o
SAMPLE ~ = = = ~ ~
DATETIME NUMBER 3 = . < . ~ <~ ~ = biD:
......................................... TOT~ NUMBER ', . · · ·
........................................ OF
~~ ~¢¢O~ I~ PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY LABORATOR
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE REC~VED BY: METHOD OF S~PMENT
LABO~TORY COMMENT~ / OBSE~A~ON~ ·
81GNATURE SIGNATURE
TIME .
PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME
? /' , . ~. ., - ....~' , . . ~J~ :. ·. · . .- ....~ .~. ,: · .,'~ '~ :~-~ ~?~,~,i",~!~::~b~.::~ .: ::~:~ ,~..,~ , .~
t ~ - .' ~ ' '~-' '... ,' ~nmen~H~thSem~:~~~t
~~e:- ~,250252' '
Pho~: ( a05 ) -~9-55~0 ~ho~.-' .:~. '~ 80~.) -~-?~84
PO~ O~ P~~ .' ' -:,
· :.., ::' :'.: .
~0~0~ ~ ~0~0~: '~" : ','::,'~::'~ .'.
1. It is the responsib~llty of the Permittee to obtain-permt~s'~.'-wh~ch/may' be
required by other regulatory agencies prior. ~o'
2. Permittee mus~ not~fy the County Enviro~ental Health Department[-a~..(805)
S61-$656 two working days prior to tank (removal)
to arrange for required inspections(s). :'.-' 'j' '-:': ':'
3. Tank closure activities mus~ be per Kern County. Env~ro~ental Health. and
F~re Departmen~ approve~ methods as described ~n
4. Soil S~pling
Any deviation from sample locations and n~bers or constituents to be
sampled for which are described below and in Handbook U.T~S0: m~s-t receive
prior approval by the Environmental Health Department.
a. (Tank size 1,000 to 10,000 gallo~) - a minim~ of fo~r samples' must
be re~rieved one-third of the way in from the ends. of each ta~ at
depths of approximately two feet and six feet. ' '."
5. If any contractors or d~sposal facilities o~her than those:l~s.ted'on'permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval 'must be. granted
bY the special/st listed on the permit.
10.
11.
12.
Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and:also near the
dispenser area(s).
Sample analysis
a. Ail (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed, for benzene,
toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons fo~'gasoline.
Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Environmental
Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil, .-.
?ermittee is responsible for making sure that "tank dispos~tion tracking
record" ~ssued w~th th~s permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling w~th 48
hours advance notice.
Results must be submitted to this office within three days'~of analysis
completion. '
starkey\O21-O6.pta
6-?-23
DATE
~700 ~!~ Stree~ Sul~ 3OO
Bak~rs~ CA 933O1
(80~) 861.3-1~9 Faz NnmKer
PF, RNIT FOR P~ CLOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
cot s
Environmental Health Services Department
PF, RI~XT BD~IBBRA921-06
FACILITY NAME/ADDI~SS:
Hopper Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
OWNER(S) NA~E/ADDRESS:
Hopper Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Phone: (805)-589-5510
CONTRACTOR:
Hopper Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA
License #250252
Phone: (805)-861-2184
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF
PERMIT EXPIRES
SEPTEMBER 6, 1989
TANK(S)
LOCATION
AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE JUNE 6, 1989
APPROVED BY ~D~
................................ POST ON PREMISES ...........................
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.
2. Permittee must notify the County Environmental Health Department at (805)
861-3636 two working days prior to tank (removal) or (inerting and filling)
to arrange for required inspections(s).
3. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Environmental Health and
Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook UT-30.
4. Soil Sampling
Any deviation from sample locations and numbers or constituents to be
sampled for which are described below and in Handbook UT-30 must receive
prior approval by the Environmental Health Department.
a. (Tank size 1,000 to 10,000 Gallons) - a minimum of four samples must
be retrieved one-third of the way in from the ends of each tank at
depths of approximately two feet and six feet.
5. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit
and permit application are to be utilized, prior approval must be granted
by the specialist listed on the permit.
PF.R~IT FOR P~NT CLOSUI~
OF UND~R~ROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES STORA~ FACILITY
PERMIT NUNB~RA921-06
ADDENDU~
10.
Il.
12.
Soil Sampling (piping area)
a minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and six feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the
dispenser area(s)·
Sample analysis
a. Ail (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene,
toluene, x¥1ene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons for gasoline·
Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Environmental
Health Department within five days of waste disposal.
All applicable state laws for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Health
Department must be notified before moving and/or disposing of any
contaminated soil.
Permittee is responsible for making sure that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 48
hours advance notice.
Results must be submitted to this office within three days of analysis
completion.
ACCEPTED BY:
DS:cd
starkey\921-O6.pta
6-7-23
DATE
7,700 "M" Slteet, Suile 300
Bnket~firld, CA 93301
(805) 861.3636
(805) 861-3429 Fnx Number
COUNTY Or' I RN -
ironmental Health Services Depart~t~'ent
Date: May 22, 1989
To: Permit Applicant: }lopper Inc.
This department has reviewed the application and plans
submitted for the underground storage facility located at
301Espee Street, known as Hopper Inc, Based on this review, your
application has been denied for the reasons listed below:
Preliminary site assessment contractor not listed on
application.
State approved lab not listed on application.
Environmental information not completed. Total number
of samples for 2 - 10,000 gal/on tanks is a minimum of
(8) eight samples. Samples must be analyzed for TPH for
gasoline, B.T.X.
If tanks are to be cleaned, complete that portion of the
permit.
We are returning a copy of ~he original permi~ application and
plans. After making required corrections and/or modifications,
the application it may be resubmitted for review.
If you have any questions regarding our requirements please
q~'~l Dan Starkey at (805) 861-3636.
DS:cd '
starkey\hopper.dni
5-22-36
.,.~,~ ., ~ .,.: · .~ ,. ,, ,~?~b~V.'~.~.~...,,,~.,~:~:~:~,<_.; ,~., ~,, '~,, ,,: ~%~-': '.,-?..~, ....,,.~-.%-~,.:, ::.,,.,~, ~:~.~ ~ ;~:~:'.,. ...... ,~. .... ~:~:, ~._i,&;~. -, ~
., . . , . ..~,, '...'' ....' ,;' ", .:......' .' ,., 5,.,..~.> ,.. ;,. -,>., ~.~,~..~,,, .. ~ .~ .,,;.;,.,,:,, ...,~. .,,.
HA US T ALS~ZARDO ~:MA=ERI:~: ' .... ', :'L-:~ --,1 .;:-',-~.,-,' ~.~'
Date - JO-~O- ~ - Underground Tank FacilitY ~ '0~ DOI~':~' '
Firm Name
Address ~01
!:'~.,~d.',~:
Person Intemewed
EPA I.D. #
Assessors Parcel'#
Type Facility
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO-COMPLY .... " ::' '": i":
The following conditions or practices observed th is date are violations of one or more sectiOns'of the CalifOrnia Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Div. 4, .Chap.. 30,' relating:to.the "storage,
handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8, :'Underground
Storage of Hazardous Substances." "' ,. .
Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below::. '.~ L. ~:, '~.-
"' ~j -J- , -'.- j:.: .: : .J- ...:. ~:...::.'::..:...~,, .
-. ,J .' : . . . .. ..... .:-:..~.' ... J
"- . .... '5, ~.l,.i
/
You~' signatur~ acknowledges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above; and is
not .~n~ ad~i'Ssi°n; of g,u, iJ'~i',?,: :
Fail~re to/f~ully.!com, p~/~ith this "Notice and Order" may result in further legal action by County or state officials.
,/ .. ,.. / hi .
!
,~ner or Authorized Representative /,'~ Agent of the Kern County Health,Officer ' . .
White -- Original
Canary -- Facility file - -"
Pink -- Specialist
UNDEROROUND
" " ' ' ' { Inspection Time
HAZ~a~RDOUS SUBST2~I~ICE STo,RAoE FACI LI TY
* INSPECT!ON REPORT *
Facility Name Address ' ' '-'
No. of Tanks la Information on Permit/Appiicati'~n Correct? Yes No Permit Posted? Yes ~'No
Type of Inspection: Routine ., Complaint Reinspection ~
Comments:
ITEM VIOLATIONS NOTED
1. Primary Containment Monitoring:
a. Intercepting and Directing System
b. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring
c. Modified Inventory Control Monitoring
d. In-Tank Level Sensing Device
e. Groundwater Monitoring ~.
f. Vadose Zone Monitoring
2. Secondary Containment Monitoring:
a. Liner
b. Double-Walled Tank
c. Vault
3. Piping Monitoring
a. Pressurized
b. Suction
c. Gravity
5. Tightness Testing
6. New Construction/~odlficatlon
7. Closure/Abandonment
8. Unauthorized Release
9. Nainteoance, Genernl Safety und
Operating Condition of Facility
Comments/Recommendations:
Reinspection scheduled?
Yes No
Approximate Reinspection Date
REPORT RECEIVED BY'~~,
INSPECTOR~'-~--"
Permit t ,' '.l ~:~ J.:F~tZ~ '
gnvlronmel{t~l Sel~sl~l~"lty ~, ~ ~ .~
UNDERGROUND
Facility Name ..~-'
No. of Tanks
Type of Inspect.ion:
HAZ~d~DOUS SUBST~CE
INSPECTION REPORT
Is Information on Permit/Application Correct? Yes/~ No
Routine /~ Complaint
Inspection Time
STORAGE FACILITY
Permit. Postsd? Yes,l~,~'"~ No __
Ret.~,pection
ITEM VIOLATIONS NOTED
1. Primary Containment Monitoring:
a. Intercepting and Directing System
f~'~ Standard Inventory Control Monitoring
c. Modified Inventory Control Monitoring
d, In-Tank Level Sensing Device
e. Groundwater Monitoring
f. Vadose Zone Monitoring
2. Secondary Containment Monitoring:
a. Liner
b. Double-Walled Tank
3. Piping Monitoring
a. Pressurized
'~'~ Suction
c. Gravity
5. Tightness Testing
6. New Construction/Modification
7. Closure/Abandonment
8. ·Unauthorized Release
,':~Maintenance, General Safety and
~..~/Operating Condition oi Facility
Low--Throughput Tank
These amended permit requirements are only applicable to tank(s)
indicated below when weekly throughput is less than 2000 gallons and
monthly throughput is less than 10,000 gallons:
Effective Date:
Facility Permit #
April 1, 1987
060014C
Tank # 2 , Regular Gas
Tank # n/a , n/a
Tank # n/a , n/a
Tank # n/a , n/a
Amended Permit Requirements:
1. Revised inventory reconciliation monitoring worksheets are to be
submitted to the Health Department on a monthly basis.
2. Revised Action Chart is to be posted at facility
3. Ail variations exceeding the following amounts must be reported as
described on page 16, Part "2" of Handbook SUT-10.
DAILY - 75 gallons
WEEKLY - 150 gallons
MONTHLY - 200 gallons
TREND ANALYSIS - No change
(Form #HMMP - 110)
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
INVENTORY RECONCILIATION SHEET
FACILITY ~~~ {...~ TANK # ~ CAPACITY i'~, lh('~ PRODUCT~--~-~y~
.,, EqUATI ON 2 EQUATI ON 3
1 ,, ~_2__ _ 4 I 12 I 5 i 14 8 I 9 I 15 15
DATE OPENING + DELIVERED _ CLOSING iNVENTORY TOTAL METERED READING TOTAL METERED TOTAL METERE
INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY REDUCTION SALES ADJUSTMENT THROUGHPUT TllROUGHPU1
DAY/ll0UR --
GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS
MEeK ~ TOTALS ," -'.":C'), III/I////////I/I//////////////I/// ."--'-' ...'-; '~' IIIIIIIIIIIII/
WEKK ~- TOTALS ~\x~_~ IIIIII/11111111/11111111111111111 '~',o'o. \ IIIIIIII/11111
~ a ~7~s ~--x 5 ///////////////////////////////// ~ x .~. 'l /////////////
~[ ~ TOTA[S x,S/ X, ////////////////////////////////2 X~X'~.~ /////////////
.... ....
///////////////////////////////// ~ /////////////
Env. Health 580 4113 (6/86) (Front)
FACILITY
! 3 4 5
OPENING OPENING CLOSING
DATE GAUGING INVENTORY INVENTORY
DAY/HOUR INCHES GALLONS GALLONS
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEP~H~TIVIENT
I N'VIiNTORY RECORDI NO SHEET
EQUAT! ON 1
6 I ? I 8 9 10
CLOSING METER DAILY METER TOTAL READING GAUGING
READING READING METERED ADJUSTMENT BEFORE
SALES DELIVERY
GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS - GALLONS INCHES GALS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPORT.
SIGNATURE
Env. Health 51{0 4]13 1018 (6/86)
2/O0 'Nf' .Street, Suite 30O
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(80S) 861.3636
(805) 86l.~429 Fax N~mber
COUNTY OF KERN
Environmental Health Services Department
RECEIVED
28198g
Hoooer. Inc.
April 21, 1989
Hopper Inc.
301Espee St.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attn: Tom Hart
Dear' Sir/Madam:
This notice is 'to acknowledge receipt of your application for
a Permit to remove 2 tanks at 301 Espee Street Pursuant to
Kern County Ordinance G-4464, a p~ocessing fee of $100.00 is
r'equired. Please remit payment as soon as possible in order to
avoid delay in the processing of your application.
Thank you for' your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
,,~..___.... ....... '.-,.. ...... .._ .' _._...;.,.._
Diana Wilson, R.E.H.S.
Environmental Health Specialist I
DW:cd
(wilson\hopper)
4-20-19
KERN COUNTY HEALTH O~PAR.TwE~rT
DIV,S,O, 0P ENV,,O,.~^L .~LTH '
I?OO FLOWER STREET. BAKERSFIELD. cA F.,~RON~AENTAL i~EALTH
IBOS! 861-3636
LENGTH OF PTPSNO TO ABANDON
APPr..' CATION ~'OR
CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
T.IS APPLICATION IS FOR
~PROJECT C~TA~ ./ / PHONE
OWNkR' ' '
PERMIT FOR PERIV[,AdqENT
OF UNDERGROUND
STORAGE FACILZTY
(FILL OUT ON__~E APPLICATION PER FACILITY)
ISEC/T/R {RURAL LOCATIONS ONLYI
RAREST CROSS STREET
'I
TANK REMOVAL CONTRACTOR ADDRESS
PR'oi~bs, EU [fROJEJAT STARTING DATE JCALIFORNIA LICENSE I Ik~RKER'S COMPE/SATION
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
LADORATOR'Y TH.AT WilL-ANALYZE SANPL~
PHONE
CHENICAL CONPOSITION OF MATERIALS STORED
TANK # VOLUME
/I~._ ~ r/r
CHEMICAL STORED (NON-COMMERCIAL NAME)
'~ /t ' . /
/,/~' <.~ L//.~ .,--
DATES STORED
To
CHEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED
WATER TO FAC:LITY PROVIDF. D BY
BASIS FOR SOIL TYPE AND GROUNDWATER DEPTH DETERNINATION
TOTAL NUMBER OF S'A,~pLI~ TO BE ANALYZED
DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER
SOIL TYPE AT FACILITY
/
~ESCRIBE }IOW RESIDUE IN TANKIS) AND PIPING IS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COMPANIES):
I
· · PI.E'.::.; r~VTD,e :NFORMATI[ON REOUEBTED ON RE~RSE SIDE OF THIS SHE~ BEFORE SUBMI~YNG APPLICATIO~ FOR REVTEW" ·
~IS FOR~ ,~A5 DEEN "~NPLE~D ~ER PKNAL~ OF PERJU~ AND ~ THE Bg~T OF ~ ~OWLEDGE IS ~UK A~ CORRE~.
NF.~T~ STREET OR INTE~TION
ANY WATER WELLS OR SURFACE WATERS WITHIN ~00'
NORT~ ~
· -' ,':,:,:,'!::
2700 "M" Slreel, Sulle 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
(805) 861.3636
(805) 861.,~429 Fnx Number
COUNTY OF KERN
Environmental Health Services Department
Date: May 22, 1989
To: Permit Applicant: Hopper Inc.
This department has reviewed the application and plans
submitted for the underground storage facility located at
301Espee Street, known as Hopper Inc. Based on this review, your
application has been denied for the reasons listed below:
1. Preliminary site assessment contractor not listed on
application.
2. State approved lab not listed on application.
3. Environmental information not completed. Total number
of samples for 2 - 10,000 gallon tanks is a minimum of
(8) eight samples. Samples must be analyzed for TPM for
~+ gasoline, B.T.X.
4. If tanks are to be cleaned, complete that portion of the
permit.
W~are returning a copy of the original permit application and
plans. After making required corrections and/or modifications,
the application it may be resubmitted for review.
If you have any questions regarding our requirements please
~ Dan St~rkey at (805) 861-3636.
starkey\hopper.dni
5-22-36
KERN CUUNTY HEALTH DEPARjfNENT
DIVISION OF ENVINONHENTAL IIEALTI!
I?00 FLOMER STREET, BAKERSFIELD. CA
lSOS) 861-3636
93305
PTo oD I'q (L
; OF TANKS TO BE ABANDONED
'LENGTI! OF PTPIHG TO ABANDON
THIS APPLICATION IS POR
APPLT CATZ ON FOR PE]~MI' T FOR PERlV[UENT
CLOS uaE/ABANDONMENT Olm UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FAG];LTT~2'
/J~REHOVAL. OR F""~ ABANDONMENT IN PLACE IFILL OUT APPLICATIOH PER FACILITY)
ONE
PHORE ,
ADDRESS
· .~ :.~-: __'-~'./' ,~ _.... ~
ADDRESS
PROJECT CONTACT
FACILITy NAME
DWN~R
SEC/T/R (RURAL LOCATIONS ONLY)
NEAREST CROSS STREET
TANK REMOVAL CONTRACTOR {ADDRESS
~ /
{
l
~ORKER'S COMPENSATION ~ INSURER
LABORATORY THAT ~ILL ANALYZE SAMPL~ ADDRESS
PHONE
( ) -
PHONE
( ) --
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MATER[ALS STORED
TANK · VOLUME CIIE.MICAL STORED (NON-COIOIERCIAL NM4E) DATES STORED
/ ~ -~"" , ,
4.,/.-, "~." -- ' ,'~" ~: TO .;:.,L-.~,
..~ . . ,/.'.,.~...-,: ,_, ~. ~. TO )I: :'~,:,...~?
CIIEHICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED
WATER TO FACILITY PROVIUF. D BY
NEAR£sT'~fATER~ ~I~LL' - GIVE diSfA~idg A~}O DEscRIeE TYPE' l~ WITHIN 500 FEET
DEPTH TO GROUNDMATER
SOIL TYPE AT FACILITY
BASIS FOR SOiL TYPE AND GROUNDMATER DEPTH DETERMINATION
TOTAL NUMBER OF SA~PL~-~ TO BE ANALYZED
S~PLES MILL BE ~ALYZED FOR:
DESCRIBE IIOH RESIDUE IN TANK(SI AND PIPING IS TO BE RENOVED AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL COIIPANIES):
~ESCRIBE BOTII TIlE DISPOSAL METIIOD AND DISPOSAL, LOCATION FOR:
PIPING
· · OLE.',:L'{ Ft~qVTD2 iNFORMATION _REQUESTED O_.~N REVERSE SIDE O....~F TIII____~ SHEff.. BEFORE SUBMITTING APPLICATIO~H .FOR REVTEN ' '
THIS FOR~ ,{X~ BEEN "3NPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY AND TO TIlE BEST IF MY KNOMLEDOE IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
~ Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.
REOEIVE
HOPPER, INC.
April 4, 1989
OUR JOB B88325
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Hopper, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
Attention: Mr. Tom Hart
SUBJECT:
Soil Contamination Investigations
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
At your request, we are pleased to submit a work plan for
Soil Contamination Investigations for the subject two sites.
Project Information
Preliminary Soil Contamination Testing (Our Job B88325} was
conducted by BSK & Associates for Hopper, Incorporated in
conjunction with the removal of 350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks
at the Espee Street Site and a 1,000 gallon fuel tank at the
Kentucky Street Site {Figures 1 and 2)' Information concerning
the type of fuels contained in the three tanks was unavailable
prior-to the Preliminary Testing.
Soil sampling was performed on February 14, 1989 in the presence
of Ms. janice Lehman of the Kern County Environmental Health
Department. Soil samples were obtained from depths of 2 and
6 feet below the bottom of each tank.
The soil samples were analyzed for the presence of Benzene,
Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene (BTXE}, Total Volatile
Hydrocarbons (TVH), and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH).
The Laboratory Soil Test Results are summarized in Table I.
Preliminary Test Results indicate relatively high levels of the
tested constituen.ts in the soil samples obtained from beneath the
350 and the 550 gallon fuel tanks at the Espee Street Site, and
from below the 1,000 gallons fuel tank at the Kentucky Street
Site.
Soil Engineering * Engineering Geology * Engineering Laboratories* Chemical Laboratories
~ Fresno, California 93706 · 1645 "E" Street, Suite 105 · Telephone (209) 485-3200
Fax (209) 485-7427
~ Fresno, California 93706 · 1414 Stanislaus Street · Telephone (209) 485-8310
= Visalia, California 93291 · 808 E. Doui~las Avenue * Telephone (209) 732-8857
:- Bakersfield, California 93304 · 117 'V' Street · Telephone (805~ 327-0671
;'~' Pleasanton, California 94566 5729-F Sonoma Drive · Telephone (415) 462-4000
Soil Contaminati. vestigation
301Espee Street 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
April 4, lgSg
Page 2
Chemical analyses of the 2 and 6 foot soil samples obtained from
below the 350 gallon tank indicate the presence of constituents
likely associated with diesel and gasoline.
Chemical analyses of the 2 and 6 foot soil samples obtained from
below the 1,000 gallon fUel tank indicate the presence of
constituents likely associated with gasoline and possibly the
components of paint thinner'- kerosene characteristics.
Based on the test results, site characterization is required by
the Kern County Environmental Health Department, to assess the
vertical and lateral extent of contamination at the Espee Street
Site and the Kentucky Street Site.
Soil and Groundwater Information
The soils in the vicinity of the project sites are classified as
Quarternary Alluvium. The soils comprise sand, gravel, silt,.and
clay alluvial fan deposits.
According to information derived from the Kern County Water
Agency 1988 Water Supply Report, a perched groundwater table may
be encountered at both sites at an approximate depth of l0 to 20
feet below the ground surface.
~e of Work
The field investigation would begin with the drilling of one
boring (B-l) at each site to confirm the depth of groundwater.~
The boring would be drilled until groundwater is encountered or
to a depth of 100 feet, whichever is less. The groundwater
borings would be drilled in a geologically similar area at a
location where soil contamination is not expected to be
encountered.
The Kern County Environmental Health Department requires that
borings which expect to encounter groundwater are properly
permitted, The County fee for test hole permits are presently
$225.00 per hole. BSK & Associates would submit the permit
applications with a check for $450.00 supplied by Hopper.
The soil contamination investigation would consist of drilling
approximately 4 to 6 borings at each site and sampling soils for
chemical analyses.
The initial test boring at the Espee Street site would be drilled
midway between the locations of the 350 and 550 gallon fuel
tanks (B-2 on Figure 1). The initial test boring at the Kentucky
Street Site would be drilled at the 1,000 gallon fuel tank
location (B-2, on Figure 2). The initial test borings would be
drilled to a maximum depth of 100 feet.
BSK
& Associates
Soil Contaminati .vestigation
301 Espee Street 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
April 4, 1989
Page 3
The remaining test borings at each site would be drilled at some
distances from the initial test boring to establish the lateral
extent of soil contamination. The proposed test boring locations
are presented in Figures 2 and 3.
The ~est borings shall be terminated at least 5.0 feet above the
confirmed depth of groundwater.
The depths, locations, and the number of borings may be modified
based on soil conditions observed at the site. A portable
photoionization detector, Photovac Tip, would be used at the site
for soil screening and to assist in determining drilling depths.
Drilling would be performed with a truck-mounted continuous flight
auger drill rig using 8" hollow stem augers. The augers, act as
continuously advancing steel casings preventing test holes from
caving-in above the levels to be sampled. The samples would be
obtained by lowering a 2-inch inside diameter sampler containing
stainless steel liners, inside the hollow stem auger, and driving
it into undisturbed soils.
Prior to drilling, we request that plans showing existing
underground utility improvements be provided. We will not be
responsible for damage to underground improvements not accurately
shown on the plans. Two overhead utility service lines at the
Kentucky Street site may interfere with the safe operation of the
drill rig. We request that these lines be temporarily removed or
shut off during drilling.
The sampler would be cleaned with Trisodium Phosphate {TSP) and
rinsed with distilled water between sampling activities. The
hollow stem augers would be steam cleaned prior to entering the
site and between borings to prevent cross-contamination.
The drill crew would consist of a driller and a helper. The
field exploration would be supervised by an engineer or a
geologist who would be responsible for preparing the field boring
logs, recording of field conditions, soil sample handling and.
preservation, Chain-of-Custody and the field equipment cleaning
process.
Samples would be collected intact in stainless steel liners.
samples would be capped with aluminum foil, then with pressure
fitted plastic caps, and sealed with adhesive tape.
The
Each sample would be labeled with an adhesive-backed label
including boring designation, depth of samples, and initials of
the individual preparing the samples. The samples would be
stored in insulated chests with "Blue Ice" and delivered on the
day of the sampling to BSK Laboratories in Fresno for testing.
BSK
Associate-
Soil Contami nati~l vestigation
301 Espee Street~' 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
April 4, 1989
Page 4
Selected 'soil samples obtained from the sites would be tested for
Total Volatile Hydrocarbons, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and
for Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene. The chemical
analyses program was outlined by Ms. Lehman. To the extent
permitted by State Regulations (maximum holding time) of 14 days,
samples not selected for chemical testing would be held in the
laboratory in the event additional testing is deemed necessary to
define the extent of contamination.
The cuttings resulting from the borings would be stored at the
~_.-site for eventual disposal by the owner. The holes would be
backfille~"td-~the ground surface with a sand-cement slurry.
Following the completion of laboratory chemical testing, a report
would be prepared describing our work and presenting the test
results.
Based on the above scope of work, we estimate the fee to be
approximately $12,110. Actual charges would be billed on the
basis of services rendered and unit prices contained in our
current Fee Schedule. A summary of the estimated charges is
enclosed for your review.
We anticipate performing the field exploration within 3 days of
receiving notice to proceed. The completed report should be
available three weeks after completion of the f~eld exploration.
Should this proposal appear satisfactory, we would ask that both
copies of the enclosed Standard Agreement be signed and returned to
this office for execution. We will return on signed copy.
The opportunity to submit this proposal is appreciated.
be pleased to discuss questions concerning its content.
We would
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
Mark F. Milward
Geologist
MFM/JBM/ds
Enclosure
BS<
Soil Contamination Investigations
301Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB 888325
April 4, 1989
Enclosure I
~i__~t~ lJ~?k Sample
ons~ Uumber
Espee 350 ES-E
Espee 350 ES-E
Espee 550 ES-W
Espee 550 ES-W
Kentucky 1,000 K
Kentucky 1,000 K
TABLE I
LABORATORY SOIL TEST RESULTS
2
6
2
6
2
6
TVH TPH Benzene
5,800 24,000 48
3,400 4,300 22
12,000 7,400 33
13,000 7,000 29
8,900 5,900 46
5,600 5,900 18
Toluene
68
65
47
38
7O
54
Total
~zlene
120
160
130
120
150
130
_Ethyl benzene
59
55
49
64
51
All concentrations in mg/kg
Detection limit for TVH:
Detection limit for TPH:
Detection limit for Benzene:
Detection limit for Toluene, Xylene, and Ethylbenzene:
I mg/kg
5 mg/kg
O. 02 mg/kg
O. 05 mg/kg
Soil Contaminati~ ,vestigations
301 Espee Street ~nd 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR dOB B88325
April 4, 1989
Enclosure 2
ESTIMATED CHARGES
Field Investigation
Drill Rig Time and
Equipment - one
operator and helper:
Field Soil
Classifications,
sampling and
observations
by Engineer or
Geologist:
Steam Cleaner:
Photoionization
Detector:
Sand-Cement Slurry:
16 hours at $132/hour
16 hours at $65/hour
2 days at $100/day
2 days at $60/day
LUMP SUM
$ 2,112
1,040
200
120
500
Analytical Testi n.g
TVH and BTXE:
TPH
30 tests at $120/test
30 tests at $ 85/test
$ 3,600
2,550
Report Pre]~aration
Site Evaluation, Permit
Application, Data
Compilation, and Report
· Preparation:
Drafting:
Clerical:
20 hours at $74/hour
4 hours at $37/hour
12 hours at $30/hour
$ 1,480
148
360
$12,110
TOTAL ESTIMATED CHARGES:
$12,110
BSK
& Associate,
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
,~ ..... .....~. ~.~ ..........
Telephone ~..~. \ - ~ !, ~..,~ ' ·
<-'"l'~lephoned Will call agai~i
Holding on line # ...........
_ Long distance call · Ret6rned your call'
Came to see you Waiting to see' you
Message ...............................................................................................
PAS 550 1151 39~J~ (R.3-86) ":
County Health Department
ivision of Enviror~aental Heal
700 ~lo~r Street, Bakersfield,
93305
Permit Date~
Application
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERA%E
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
~ of App! ica t ion (check):
r']New Faci['lty [~]Modification of Facility [~isting Facility
flaergency 2¢-Hou~ Contact (name, area code, phone): Days (8053 861-7184
Nights (805). 393-74~,7
Facility Name HOPPER INC No. of Ta~tk~
Type of Business (Ch-e'~k): rTGasolIne St~'tion ~Or. her (deSCribe) ,INDUSTRAIL,
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? r-lYes f'~No
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for ;~jrlcultural Purposes? I-lYes
[~Transfer of O~ership
Facility Address 901 ESPEE ST
T R SEC
(~r HOPPER INC
Address301ESPEE ST
OperatOrHOPPER INC
Address ~o, Box ~9oo ~E~SF~ELP
Nearest Cross St. UNION AVE
(~ural Locations (~ly)
Contact Persoi~ TOM HART
Zip 93303 Telephone f80~) 861-7000
Contac~ Per~m~ TOM HART
Zip 93303 TeleP~(805) 861-7184
Waist to Facility Provided by CAILF WATER SERVICE DepCh to' Groundw~
Soil Characterilttcs at Facility ''- SANDY
Basis for Soil Typ~ a~i Grom~dwa~er Dapth Deteminations ~XC~AT~O~ _~
Contracto~
Address
Proposad Stab[tn9 Date
Worker's Cmpe~ati~n.certification
CA Contractor' a Licer~e !~.
Zip Telepl~on~
Proposed Caapletion Dat~
UNKNOWN ,.
If This P~mit Is ~or Modification Of An ~isting Facility, Brtefly l~ril~ Nod/fic~tio~a
Propo~d
Tank(s) Store (check all that ap~ly):
Tank~ ~aste Product Motor Vehicle
0 0 0
Unleaded Regular Premi~ Diesel Waste
Chemical Omposttion of Materials Stored (not necessary for ~otor vehicle fuels)
Tank
Transfer of O~merahtp
rote o~
p~evious l~acllll;y Hame
I,
Previous Owner
accept fully'all' obligatiOns of Pemit No. " isa~ to
I understand that the Pemittir~j ~utl~rity say review and
m~dlfy or te~lnate the transfer of the
facility upon receiving this ccmpleted form.
This fona has been c~mpleted under penalty of
true and correct.
permit to Operate this ~lerqrmaxl storage
perjury and to the besl; o~ my knowledge is
Title PLANT MANAGER [~teMARCH 29 1985
Pemit No. ,..J
TANK__ ~ L_ _ (FI.LL OUT SEPARATE~ PORM FOR CH T~NK)
FOR EACti SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
3. Primar_~Containment
~ Ins~ickness (Inches)
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
4. Tank Secondary contairm~ent
"'[-l'Double-~all l-I Synthetic Liner
e
Tank is: [-]Vaulted [-]Non-Vaulted ['lDeuble-Wall ~Sin~le-Wall
~ Mater iai
OFarbon Steel [-] Stainless Steel [-~Polyvinyl Chloride [~Fiberglass-Clad Steel
iberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Alunin~n [] Brollza I-IUnkno~n
ther [describe)
Capacity (Gallons) Manu[acturer
. .lOgO00 UNKNOWN
[]Lined Vault []None [~]Unkno~
[-1Other (describe): Manufacturer~
['lMaterial Thick'ess (Inches) Capacity (Gals.)
Tank Interior Lining
--~R~bbar ~]Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay []L~lined I IOther (describe)~
Tank Corrosion Protection
---~rGal'va~i'zed -~'~rass-Clad []Polpethylene Wrap ['lVinyl Wlrapplng
~]Tar or Asphalt []Unkno~ ..~None [']Other (describe) l
Cathodic Protection: UJlNone LJImpressed Current System ~l~a~rl[lcial ~ system
Describe System& Equipment:
Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception
a. Tank: '['1Visual (vaulted tanks only) [-[Ground~ter Nonttorlng'W~ll(s)
[]Vadose Zone Monitoring ~lell(s) FlU-Tube Without Liner
i~U-~ with Ccmpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monltorln~ I~ll(s)e Vapor Detector* IlLiquid Level 5ensor*['lCondu~tivit~ Sensor~
Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank..
B Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fr~n U-Tube,~Monitoring ~lell or Annular Space
[~xDallyGauging & Inventory Reconciliation I-Iperiodic Tigh~T~tillg
~None I'lUnkno~n UlOther
b. Piping~ Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized PipingTM
[]Monitoring S~p with Racevay l-]Sealed Concrete Race,my
[]Half-Cut Ccmpattble Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner
[] Unknmm [] Other
*Describe Make & Model:
8.
~en Tightness Tested? ~-]¥es []No
Date of La~c Tightness Test
Test Name
Results of Test
Testing O:~pany
Repaired? []Yes ~NO []Unknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
10. Overfill Protection
[ilDperator l~ills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
[]Tape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
Capacit~.ance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box ['lNone [-1Urlkno~ll
Other i
List ~ke & Model ~ AMore Devices
11. Piping
a. Underground Piping:
~Yes ONo [-IUnkno~ MaterialGALVANIZED PIPE
Thickness (l~hes) Dieter ~nufacturer
~essure ~ion~' DGravity ~roxi~te ~ ~f ~=~ 15 FEET
b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ Corrosi~ Prot~ti~ :
~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rent ~crificial
~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vlnyl Wr~ ~Tar ~ ~lt
~U~o~ ~ne ~her (de~ri~):
c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contal~nt:
~1~11 ~~etic Liner
TANK # _~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR .CH TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
1. Tank is: I-]Vaulted ClNon-Vaulted ['3Double-Wall f~$ingle-Wall
2. Ta~ Material
Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic UI Concrete ~] Alumin~n [-] Bronze [-II~lknown
Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment '
e
Date Installed '" Thickness (Inches)
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
Tank SeCondary Containment
[-[-----~uble-Wall [] Synthetic Liner
[-]Other (describe):
['1Material
5. Tank Interior ~
Cimk OEmxy
i-IOther (describe):
6.
Capacity (Gallons) ,anuiacturer
10 ~ 000 UNKNOWN
~'1 Lined Vault
Thickness (Inches)
None [mlUnknoblp.
Manufacturer:
Capacity (Gals.)
OPbenolic []Glass []Clay ~lt~li~!
e
Tank Corrosion Protection "
~Galvanized '-~r~--'~ass-Clad ['~Poly~thylene Wrap •Vinyl Wrappir~
~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~)~
Cat, lc Prot~tion: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~crift~i~~ ~t~
~ri~ Syst~ & Equt~ent:
Leak Detection, ~itori~, a~ Int~ '
a. Tank: ~Vl~'l (vault~ t~ks only) ~Gro~ter
O Vadose Zo~ ~nitorl~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wi~ut
[-lU-Tube with C~npatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitorirg Igsll(s)*
[-! Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor*. [-] Conductivit~
[-1 pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank ....
[] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitorir~] ~11 or A~ular Space
]~Pally Gau~irg & Inventory Reconciliation ['1Periodic
[]None []~kno~ []Other
b. pipirg: Flow-Restrictirg Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'
~lMonitoring St~p with Race~y [-1Sealed Concrete Rece~ay
['l[talf-Cut Compatible Pipe Race~ay []Synthetic Liner Race,my
r7 ~nkno~ ~ Other
*Describe Make & I~xJel:
Tank
~en Tightness Tested? [-]Yes []No ~kno~
Results of Test
Testing Company
Date of Last Tightness Test
Test Name
~ Repaired? ['[Yes l-IN• ~Unkno~n
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
10. Over~tll Protection ....
l~Operator 'Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors ~evel
OTape Float Gau~e [-1Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls
B Capacl[ance Sanaor []Sealed Fill Box []None [']Unkno~
Other:
List ~ke & ~xlel ~ ~ Pevices
11. Piping
a. Underground Piping: ~Yes ~No DUnknown Material GALVANIZED PIPE
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
I-[Pressure [~uction []Gravity Approximate Length of Pipa
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protectio~ : -
~Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad [-]Impressed Current ~]Sacrificial Anode
[-]Polyethyle~e Wrap [-]Electrical Isolation [-1Vinyl Wrap [-1Tar o~A~lt
[-lunkno~m []None [-]Other (describe):
c. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Containment:
1. Tank is: {']Vaulted {~Non-Vaulted }']Double-Wall {']Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
Carbon Steel [-] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [-] Concrete [-] Aluuin~tm [-] 8roftze [-[U~lkr~%
Other (describe)
3. pt imar¥ Containn~nt
Dat® Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallo~) Hanufacturer
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 250
4. Tank Secondary Containment
[]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner [[]Lined Vault
~]Other (describe):
['1Material Thickness (Inches)
5. Tank Interior Lining
--~Rubber 'l'1~ []Epoxy ~Imenolic []Glass
['1Other (describe):
6. Tank Corrosion Protection
None 0 Unknown
Manufacturer:
Cal~cit¥ (Gals.)
m
--~Galvanlzed "~l~~ass-Clad []Polyethyle~ k/tap UlVinyl Wra$~ing
I~Tar or Asphalt fiUnkr~ []No~ []Other (describe)
Cathodic Protection: ~None filmpressed Current System ['lSacrl'~l¢l&l ~ System
Describe System & Equipment:
Leak Detection, ~, and Interception
a. Tank: [~Visual (vaulted t~ks only) []Groundwater Monitorir~'
[]Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [-]U-Tube Without Liner
~[]U-Tube with Cc~patible Liner Directin~ Flow to Monltorir~
Vapor Detector' [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivit~ Sensore
Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Ta~lk-
Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring t~ll OF A~wlttlar Space
~/]Dally Gau~il~ & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic T~qht~leW 1'~ting
fi Nonm [] Unknown [] Other
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized
[]Monitoring S~up with Race~ay []Sealed Concrete Raceway
[]Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Llrte~
e
[] Unknotm I-IOther
*Describe Make & Nodel: .......
B.
~en Tightness Tested? fiYes []No
Results of Test
Testing Campeny
Date of Last Tightness Test
Test Name
9. Tank Repair
~~paired? U1Yes []No []~Onknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
10. Overfill ~rotection
'-]~7-Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
[']Tape Float Gauge [qFloat Vent Valves fi Auto Shut- Off Controls
BCapacl~ance Sensor fi]Sealed Fill Box [']None []Unknown
Other: List Make & Mo(lei ~e~ Above Dmvic~
11.
a. Underground Piping: ~Yes [2]No ~Unkno~n Material GALVANIZED PIPE
Thick~ss (itches) U~ Dia~ter U~f~owN Manufacturer UNKNOWN.
fi]Pressure ~Suction []Gravity ~roxi~te ~ of ~ ~
b. U~ergro~ Pipi~ CortoSi~ Prot~ti~ : '
~lvaniz~ ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~ess~ ~rent ~crif{cial ~
DPolye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar ~ ~lt
~Un~o~ ~ne ~her (de~ri~):
c. .Undergro~ Pipit, Sectary Contai~nt:
~'PT~ ''~ 550
"~ 2
2 9
3 16
4 24
5 34
6
9
10
1I
1000 2000
4od 'aoo 6ooo
5 5 8 10 9 11
15 14 22.4. 29 26 32
28 27 40 !52 48 59
43 41 62 !81 .74 90
60 57 86 112 104 126
7500 --.-noo :"'"'1ooo0:"" 1'2ooo." ' '
38 41 53 60 ;~
69 76 97 Ill
106. 117 149 '170
148. 163 208 237
391.,
sod
664
760
58. 99 94 141
67 120 114 204
79 142 136 '238
92 165 159 400
104 'q-89 182 273
342"
416
49.5
578
147 136 165 .194 .'214
185 171 208 244': 269
225 208 253 297 327
267 248 301 354 389
311 289 351 413 454
358 332 404 475 522 665
12
13
.14
15
119 213 207 310
134 239 232 348
148 265 258 387
163 291 285 428
406 377 458 539 '593 755
455 424 515 606 667 ... 848
507 472 574 675 742 945
'560 522 634 746 821 1044
· 863
970.
1080
1194
16 178 318 313 469
17 194 345 341 511
18 209 373 370 555
19 224 401 399 599
20 240 429 429 644
614 573 696 819 901 "1147
669 625 759 894 983 1251
725 679 825 970 1067 1358
783 734 891 1048 1153 1468".
812 790 ~59 1128 1241'" 157~'
1310
1430
1552
1677
1805
21
22
23
24
25
254 457 459 689
270,m 485 490 735
28~ 514 521 782
301 542 5~3 830
317 570 584 878
901 846 1028 1209 1330 1693 1935
962 904 1098 1292 1421 1809 2067
1023 9~3 1169 ' 1376 15I'3 ~926' :..2201
1085 1023 1242 1461 1607 2045' 2338
1148 1083 1315 1547 1702 2166 .,~576
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4!
42
43
44
332 598
347 626
363 , ,654
378 682
394 709
617 926 1211
650 975 .. 1275
683 1024 1340
716 1074'~:' 1401
749 1124 1470
783 1174 1536
816 1225 1602
850 1276 1668
884 1327 1735
918 1378 1802
409 735
423 762
437 787
451 812
465 836
1144 1389 1635 1798 2289'
1206 1465 1723 1896 241'3
1~69 1541 1813 1994 2538 .
1332 1618 '1903 2094 2665
1396 ,, 1695 1~95 ,, 2194 ,,2793
1461 1774 2087 229~ 2'922
1526 1853 2180 2398 3052
1.592 1933 2274 '2501 3183
1657 2012 2368 2604 3315
1724 2093 2463 2709 3448
2616
2757.
2900
3045
3192:
3330,..~,
3488
3638.
3788
3g~O
478 860 952
491 882 987
504 904 1021
515 924 1055
526 .944 1089
534 961 1123
544 977 1158
552 991 1191
560 1003 1225
1011 1259
· 1429 1869 1791
1480 1936 1858
1532 2003 '1925
1583 2070 1993
1634 2137 2061
2174 2558. 2814
2256 2654 29'20.
2338 2751 3026 ~
2420 2848 3i32 398Z
2503 2.94~ · 3239 '4123
2584 3040 3344 4256'
26~'9. 3140 3454 ~. 4397
2753 3239 3562 4534
2836 3337 36'70 4672
2920 3435 3779 4310
1605 2244 2128
1736 2271 2198
1787 2337 2267
1838 2404 2336
1889 2470 2405
3582 "40{3
3716
3857"'",44~1
' ..'15;56"'.,~..,.:
: 4'712 :..!i.~~, '
4864 .'~ ~''?
5025':
5182
5339'
5497 .'
:~6 .~ 1295 1939 2536
47 /'/%' 1327. 1989 2601
48 . 1359 2039 2666
',9 --7~A/~'~ / 1392 2088 2731 2681, 3255
50 1425 2]37 2795 2750.'., 3339
52 __ ,. _.,.--- 1489 2234 2921 2888 ' 3507
54 /~"-' ----/1552 2328 3014 3027 3675
55 1583 2374 3105 3093 3756
2474 3004 3534 3887 4948
2543 3088 3633 3996 5086
2612 3172 -3731 4104 5224
3830 .' 4213' 5362 6128
3929 4321" 55~0 6286
5655 .-.
58,12 .
97o. '
4027 4430:
4125 453'8
4224 · 4646
4324 4756
4419 486I
5638 6444
5776 6601
5913 6758
6053 ,~-~6918
.6187':""7071
56. .. 1613 2420 3164 3161 3839. 45.16 4968 6323.-;i',.:-7... 7.~_.~'L' ~ ,..,,:..., ,'""t~'", ,
57 1643 2464 .3223 3229 3921 4613 5'075 '6459 .:..~'."[381
58' 1672 2508 3280 J297 ~ -400'3 4710' 5181 .:6~9~?.1/"'.' 7}36-.."
59 1706 2552 3337 3364 '4085 4806' '52~6 '~6728~.:!""76~9.'.,~,4.'.:'".,'''
6.0, '1719 2578 3372 3431 '4166
,: .. ...... - . ' . _.~,..-,,i":~.~"~.'<" '"" ..' .,,
Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but since many
Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits
sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted.
Please fill in Permit -- and check one of the following before
returning this form with payment:
!. Send all informat}on to Owner at the address
listed on invoice (if Owner is different than
Operator. it ~'ili be Owner's responsibility
to provide Operator with pertinent
informationl.
2. Send all information to
following corrected address:
Owner at the
3. Send all information to Operator:
Name:
Address:
(Operator can make copy of permit
Owner).
for
6-2
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
7O
1784
1810
1835
1860
2~ 3499' 3563
2.715 3550 3629
2753 3600 3694
2790 364~~ 3758
2825 36~'& 3822
2859
2891
2922
2951
1883'
1906
1927
1947
1967
3739 3886
3781 3948
3821 4010
3859 4072
4328 50911~I 00' '7127
4407 5184 .5703' 7258
4486 5277 5805 7388
4564 5369 5906 7517
8145
8295
8444
8591
4642 5461 6007 7645
4719 5551 6106 7772
4795' 564~ ;6205 7897
4870 5729 6302 .8021
4944 5817' 6398 8143
8737
8882
9025
9167
9307
71
72
73
75
7e
78
79
8O
81
82
83
84
85'
86
87
88
89
9O
91
92
93
94
95
1985
.2001
::.2015
~2027
2037
2042
2977
.3001
3023
3041
3055
3063
3894
3925
3953
3977
3996
4006
4132 5018' 5903 .6493
4192 5090 ,:5~188 6587
4250 5161 /'6072 6679
4308 5232 6155 7660:
4365 5300 ..' 6236 6860
4421 ..... 5368' 6316 6947'
4476 5635 6394 7033
4529 5500 6470 7117
458i 5563 6545:. 7200
4633 5625 6618 7280
8264 '9445
8384 958~
8501 971f,
8617 9848
8730 9978~:
8342 10105
8951 10230
9059 10~53
9163 ~:'i:0~72
92&5. .1'0~89
468~i' 5686 6689 73'~T~"~',~' '
4730 5744 6758 7434., 946;}':~,'
4777 5801 6825 7507 9555.
4822 5856 6889 1578 9615
4866 5908 6951 7646 9732
4907 5959 7010 7711 9811
4947 6007 7067
4983 6052 7120
5019' 6094 7170
5051 6133 7216
5106 6200 7295
5123 6227 7326
5145 6248 7351
5155 6260 7364'
10703
10813
10917
11022"
11122
112fg-7-
7773 9893 11307
7832 9968 11391
7886 10037 11417'
7937 '10102 11545
789~--TOHT-'-"YY~TI ....
8024 10212 11671
8059 -10257 ..11722 '.
8086 10291, 11761'
8101 .10310 117.83"'
j,
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305-4190
Telephone (805) 861-3621
kERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
April 6, 1987
LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D.
Director of Public Health
Air Pollution Control Officer
Hooper, Inc.
301 Espee Street
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, California 93305
Dear Sirs:
After careful review of the reportable inventory variations at your
factllty located at 301 Espee Street in Bakersfield, California (permit
#060014C), this Department has concluded that these results are due' to a
history of Iow throughput. This letter is to advise you that you will be
granted a "provisional exemption" from the standard reporting described in
your permit packet.
This Department is currently undertaking a study of the inventory
control problems of low-throughput tanks. To facilitate this, a copy of
reconciliation worksheets for tanks listed on the attached outline must be
sent to this Department monthly so that we may add this information to our
data base. Please send all submittals to my attention.
Our preliminary information indicates that a change in reportable
variations is necessary when the throughput of a tank is less than 2,000
gallons per week and less than 10,000 gallons per month. The accompanying
"Low-Throughput Tank Reporting 0utllne" describes these changes.
A revised action chart and an example of a changed summary sheet (on
the back of inventory reconciliation worksheet) have also been enclosed for
your convenience. Please make these changes on your worksheets for weeks
In which you have low throughput.
Be advised that this provisional exemption is subject to change as
further data becomes available to the Health Department. If, however, a
listed- tank at any time exceeds the defined low-throughput amounts, you
must revert to compliance with the original reporting requirements. If you
have any questions regarding this correspondence I can be reached at (805)
861-3636 between 8 am - 9 am.
Sincerely,
Environmental Health Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:sw
Enclosures
FACILITY
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
INVENTOI~Y RECONCILIATION SHEET
TANK ~ 2__- cApACITY ~'~>,,, ~,~C'~ ~ROD~CT ~~%.~
MONTH/YEAR '&,(-., (
1 I
DATE
DAY/HOUR
4
OPENING
INVENTORY
GALLONS
WEEK
EQUAT I ON 2
DELIVERED CLOSING
INVENTORY INVENTORY
GALLONS I GALLONS
1 TOTALS
14
INVENTORY
REDUCTION
GALLONS
2 TOTALS
I t
WEEK 3 TOTALS
WEEK 4 TOTALS
j
t \ ',2 'f
Ii
EQ~JATI ON S
TOTAL METERED READING TOTAL METERED
SALES ADJUSTMENT THROUGHPUT
GALLONS [ GALLONS
IIIIIIII!IIIIII!I/IIIIII/III/IIII
IIIIIII1111II!!!/t/II!I/!iI/I//1/
%? ,'"t
\,,,\
/////////////////////////////////
~¥. ~ I
i
GAL.LONS
2////////////////';'"?/////////////
~x~.Y I ½%. ¥
15
EQUATI ON 4
TOTAL METERED
THROUGHPUT
GALLOt~L5
INVENTORY AMOUNT
REDUCTION OVER OR SHORT
GALLONS I +,GALS. {-GALS.
'..eL t
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
INVENTORY RECONCILIATION SHEET
EQUATI ON' ' 2 EQUATI ON 3 }l EQUATI ON 4
OPENING DELIVERED CLOSING INVENTORY TOTAL METERED READING TOTAL METERED [ ToTA'L METERED INVENTORY AMOUNT
DATE
+
__ INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY REDUCTION ' SALES ADJUSTMENT THROUGHPUT THROUGHPUT REDUCTION OVER OR SHORT
DAY~tlOUR -__ GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS i - _GALLONS t GALLONS I GAIeLONS +GALS -GALS.'
~ ' ......~1~ .~,
~0~BY TOT~S ' IIIIIIIi11111111111,11111111111111~0 · I//I/I,~,,'" ...........
Env. Healt~ 580 4113 1017 (6/86) (F:ront)
FACILITY
1 2
DATE
EOUATI ON 2
4 I i s I
OPENING DELIVERED CLOSING
INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY
GALLONS GALLONS
\~%~
KERN C 6~jN/l?-'~'Y i~ E AL TH DEPARTMENT
XNV~-NTOR¥ R~-CONCXLXATXON SH~.ET
14 8 9 j 15
INVENTORY TOTAL METERED READING
REDUCT I ON SALES ADJUSTMENT
WEEK 1 TOTALS
GALLONS GALLONS
\ ~'z',,,~
WEEK 2 TOTALS
WEEK 3 TOTALS
WEEK 4 TOTALS
PERMIT
MONTHLY TOTALS
GALLONS
TOTAL METERED
THROUGHPUT
GALLONS I "~ ~" ¥ GALLONS
~IIIIIIII:
,/I//////
-Z'D . B
U/1/1/1/1//
'11111111111I
I!11111111111111~
15
EQUATI ON 4
I 14 [ 16 __
TOTAL METERED INVENTORY AMOUNT
THROUGHPUT REDUCTION OVER OR SHORT
GALLONS
GALLONS
{ \'-C%
, I
IIIiit11111!111f11111111111111~
I/I/H/I///////////////////////
-~ ~,. '~, \LA_
'4,:.-~- ~ ~
1/1/1/////////////////////M//
l/Il/Mil~
Illllll/lll//1/f/1/1//////////
+GALS.
-et) ,:
-GALS.
aZ. ri
llnv. Health 580 4113 1017 {6/86) (Front)
/
FACILITY _ ~"~q.~.~ ~.~__._
INVENTORY RECONCILIATION SHEET
TAN~ ~ ~ CAPACITY \~,~ PRODUCT
EQUATION 2 1' EQUATISN 3 ~ EQUATION 4
DATE OPENING + DELIVERED - cLOsING = INVENTORY [ TOTAL METER'ED - READING TOTAL METERED TOTAL METERED INVENTORY
~_ INVENTORY ,,INVENTORY INVENTORY REDUCTION SALES ADJUSTMENT = THROUGHPUT THROUGHPUT - ,REDUCTION = OVER OR SHORT
DAY/HOUR .... GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS ~ GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS [ GALLONS
,Env. Health 580 4113 (6/86) tFt'ont)
A. Percent Variation: ~-]
-- - Col. Gals. x
Amount Over/Short (Col. 16) Gals. ~ Total Metered Throughput -
B. R_ep~rting: ~
1. Does the Amount Over or Short exceed $50 6als? NO - Continue rou~ne monitoring ~]YEs - Repo]
2. Does the Variation exceed 557 ~]NO - Continue routine monitoring ~YES - Report tq Permitting Authority
Z.I
A. Percent Variation:
Amount Over/Short (Col. 16)~\~ ~ Gals Total Metered Throughput (Col 15)
· - Gals. x 100.
B. _Reporting:
1. Does the Amount Over or Short exceed 350 Gals? NO - Continue routine monitoring ~]YE9 - Repo
2. Does the Variation exceed 5~? QNO - Contin_u~_ routine monitoring ~]YE$ - Report to Permitting Authority
2. Does the Variation exceed 5~?
A.' Percent Variation:
Amount Over/Short (Col. 16) Gals.
1. Does the Amount Over or Short exceed 350 Gals?
~NO -
Total Metered Throughput (Col. 15) Gals. x 100 =
OMO - Continue routine monitoring [-]YES - Rep,
Continue routine ~oUitoring ~]YB$ - Report to Permitting Auth°rlt~Y
wm 41
A. Percent Variation:
Amount Over/Short (Col. 16)
1. Does the Amount Over or Short exceed 350 Gals?
2. Does the Variation
mumm
A. Percent Variation:
Amount Over/Short (Col. 16)
B. R_~orting:
Does the Variation exceed 1.5~?
Oals. ~ Total Metered Throughput (Col. 15) Gals. x 100 = ~
[~NO - Continue routine monitoring ~]YES - ReI
- Continue routine monitorini ~]YES - Report to Permitting Authorl~t'
Gals. ~ Total Metered Throughput (Col. 15)
Gals. x 100 = _
- Continue routine monitoring.
I' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPORT.
Eflv. 14eallb 580 4113 1017 (6/86) (8~k)
Variation
Report within 24 hours of dtscove
rity within 24 hours of discovery.
Variation
Report within 24 hours of dlscove
,rity within 24 hours of discovery.
Variation
Report within 24 hours of dlscow
)rity Within 24 h°urSOf discoverY.
Variation
Report within 24 hours of discow
orlty within 24 hours ~f ~lecovery
~]YES - Report to Permittin~ Authori_t
Variation
DA~ority within 24 hours of discovery
DATE
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
IN~NTORY RECONCILIATION SHEET
-- E(~UATI ON 2 E(IUATI ON 3
DATE OPENING + DELIVERED _ CLOSING .= INVENTORY TOTAL "ETE"ED _ READING = TOTAL .eTEaeO; TOTAL
I ~ENTORY INVE~ORY I NVE~ORY , REDUCTION SALES ~JUS~ENT THROUGHPUT THROUGHP.~
DAY/ilOU~ ' GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS
F'nv..l-lealth 5~0 41 ]3 1017_(6/86) (Front}
QUAT! ON 4
1- ~4 I '~ __
-INVENTORY AMOUNT
-- REDUCTION OVER OR SHORT
GALLONS +GALS. -GALS.
This c]~kiist to ensure
is provided that all necessary packet enclosures were received
and that the Permlttee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to KCHD in the self-addressed envelope provided
within 30 days. of receipt.
Check:
Yes No
A. The packet I received contained:
Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Perett, Phase I Interie Permit
1)
Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement Between Owner and
Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-3941), Explanation of Substance Codes,
Equipment Lists and Return Envelope.
2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10.
3) The Following Forms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet
b) Inventory Reconciliation Sheet with summary on reverse
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
4) An Action Chart (to post at facility)
B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring
Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between 0~ner and Operator), and
find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator*s name and
address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (If "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet).
X
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s)
3) Water-finding paste
D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information- Sheet" pertaining to
Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between
owner and operator).
I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed on permit).
F. As required on page 6 of Handbook tUT-10, all meters._ at this facility have had
calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered
device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook).
O. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance
with procedures...described in Handbook #UT-lO.
Date Star~ed
$iEnature o£ Person
Title:
1700 Flower Street
Bakerafleld, California g330~
Tetel~tone (80~ 8~ 1-3~3~
KL.,N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'.
I NTERI M PERMIT
TO OPERATE:
UNDER~ROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
STORAGE FACILITY
¢
FACILITY:
HOPPER, INC.
301ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
ENVIRONMEN'IAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFF1GER
Leon M Hebe~tm~n,
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986
EXPI RES: JULY 1, 1989
NUMBER OF TANKS-- 3
OWNER:
HOPPER, INC.
30! ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
9330'3.
TANK # AGE(IN YRS) SUBSTANCE CODE
1-3 UNK MVF 3' NO
PRESSURIZED PIPING?
NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT
NON--TRANSFERABLE ~ ~ ~ POST ON PREMISES
DATE PS.MIT MA]'T,R'T): ,,lAN
DATE PERMIT CH~CK LIST RETURNED:
1700 Flower Street
Bakerefield, California 93306
Telephone (805) 861-3636
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M I. lebef~n, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH
Vernon $. Relahard
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Date __. ~ O -.~ O - ~.'~
Firm Name
Address ~OI ,'z~_,~.¢ ~ ~ -~' '
~,-~ ¢('%; .... ,,q~ '~
Person Interviewed
Underground Tank Facility #
EPA I.D. #
Assessors Parcel #
Type Facility
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY
The following conditions or practices observed this date are violations of one or more sections of the California Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage,
handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8, "Underground
Storage of Hazardous Substances."
Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below:
You~ signature' acknowled, ges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above, and is
not an admission of guit(. '
Failure to:fully:complY, with this "Notice and Order"
may result in further legal action by County or State officials.
/-") Ag~n{ of the Kern County Health Otficer
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Olrector
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOURCE ~iENT
DEPART~r~MENTAIL
January 16, 1990
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakermfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 8~1-3429
AGENCY
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA
93303
Subject: Site Characterization
Location: 801Espee Street, Bakersfield, CA
31.!~.e~tucky Street, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Hart:
This Department has received the site characterization reports prepared by
BSK and Associates for the above referenced facilities. In October of 1989, Mr.
Joe Canas from this Department discussed with Mr. Mark Millard of BSK that
additional information was necessary in order to complete the review of the site
characterization reports. Specifically, the following information was to provided
in an addendum to these reports:
A discussion of why the sample borehole locations were changed from
those approved in the site characterization workplan.
A feasibility study for each of the remediation alternatives. At a
minimum the study should contain the information required in the
enclosed handbook UT #35, included should be a risk and cost analysis.
The environmental contractor should also recommend the remediation
alternative best suited to this site, taking into account the
information addressed in the feasibility study.
Upon further review of these reports there are other areas which must be
further addressed in order to complete this review. They pertain to the Espee Site
and are as follows:
Why was boring B-3 terminated at 26 feet? The levels of contamination
found in B-3 far exceed the levels detected at a similar depth in the
boring B-2, which was drilled to a depth of approximately 70 feet.
Why were samples not retrieved at the termination depths of B-4 and B-
$? The last samples retrieved from these borings both show high levels
of contamination. The levels of contamination found in both B-4 and
B-5 far exceed the levels detected at similar depths in boring B-2.
Tom Hart
January 19, 1990
Page 2
This report makes the statement "On the basis that the 350 and 550
gallon fuel tanks are the point sources of the subsurface
contamination..." Are there other possible sources for the
contamination? If so, they should be addressed.
The addendum containing the above information must be submitted to this
office within 15 days, so that we may complete our review.
If you should have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Janis Lehman
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:cas
\hart.ltr
January 16, 1990 ·
Tom Hart
Hopper, ~nc.
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA
93303
Subject:
Site Characterization
Location: 801Espee Street, Bakersfield, CA
311 Kentucky Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit #: 060014 and 140012
Dear Mr. Hart:
This Department has received the site characterization reports prepared by
BSK and Associates for the above referenced facilities. In October of, lg8g,.Mr.
Joe Canas from this Department discussed with Mr. Mark, Millard. of BSK that
additional information was necessary in order to complete the review-of-the site
characterization reports. Specifically, the following information was to provided
in an addendum to these reports:
1. A discussion of why the sample borehole locations were Changed from'
those approved in the site characterization workplan.
A feasibility study for each of the remediation alternatives. At a
minimum the study should contain the information required, in'the
enclosed handbook UT #35, included should be a risk and.cost analysis.
The environmental contractor should also recommend the.'remediation.
alternative best suited to- this site, taking into account 'r'the
information addressed in the feasibility study.
Upon further review of these reports there are other areas which must be
further addressed in order to complete this review. They pertain to theEspee Site
and are as follows:
Why was boring B-3 terminated at 26 feet? The levels of contamination
found in B-3 far exceed the levels detected at a similardepth in the
boring B-2, which was drilled to a depth of approximately 70 feet.
Why were samples not retrieved at the termination depths of B-4 and B-
57 The last samples retrieved from these borings both show high levels
of contamination. The levels of contamination found in both B-4 and
B-5 far exceed the levels detected at similar depths in boring B-2.-
/
3 This report makes th'e statement the basis tliat.~i
gallon fuel tanks are the point,' So'urceS:",'°f.,~."~tli&'~i;:)gf~b'~U!~face:
contamination'..." Are there other., possi~ble
contamination? If so, they should be addressed;..~'-" ':.: ,,q:.'-..??.:~,~;-:',...--,: .,.' .~"
The addendum containing the above information must be-sub,m,'i,t:t:ed~.':'to:th;fs
office within 15 days, so that we may complete our revi.ew..-'~.' ,'-~"
If'you should have any questions, please call me at (805),' 861~.36367"i'
JL:cas
\hart.ltr
Sincerely,
Jani s Lehman '
.- . ... ~ .:, ,,.,~. %.~.~,~..-.,'. ~..-~. ,, . ·
Hazardous Materi al
Hazardous
Materi
al s Management Program,',':" ~':,-":'.. .
. ', ....: :L~;~ ,..['~... :.' .., ...:
?
BSI(
& Associates, Geotechnical Consultants. Inc.
HOPPER, INo.
July 21, 1989
JUL 2 8 1989
OUR JOB B88325
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Hopper, incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
9'3303
Attention: Mr. Tom Hart
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Tank Site Assessment
301Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
In accordance with our agreement, we have performed a Preliminary
Tank Site Assessment in conjunction with the removal of two
underground fuel storage tanks and a dispenser island located
within the Hopper, Incorporated facility at 301 Espee Street in
Bakersfield, California.
The project involved obtaining soil samples for chemical testing
from beneath Lhe storage tanks and 'the dispenser island. The
northern fuel tank (Figure 1) reportedly contained an approximate
capacity of 10,000 gallons, was used to store unleaded gasoline.
The 10,000 gallon volume southern tank was used to store leaded
gasoline. The fuel dispenser island was located approximately
4.5 fees southwest of the leaded gasoline tank.
~ect site was the subject of a previous Preliminary Tank
The pre,
Site Assessment conducte~ by BSL & Associates (Job B88325, report
dated February 27, 1989). lhe project involved obtaining soil
samples for chemical testing from beneath 350 and 550 gallon fuel
~anks loca~eu d~r~ctiy northeast, and partially underneath, the
fuel dispenser island. Chemical analyses of the soil samples
obtained from beneath those tanks indicated detectible
concentrations of hydrocarbon constituents.
Soil Engineering* Engineering Geology* Engineering Laboratories*Chemical Laboratories
'_' Fresno, California 93706
.... I-resno, Calilornia '9370b
;~ Visalia, California 93291
~ Bakersfield, California 93304
:? Pleasanton, California 94566
t(>45 "E" Street, St,*te 10.5
1414 bidn~siaus Street
808 E. Douglas Avenue
117 "V" Street
5729-F 5onoma DrNe
Telephone (209) 485-3200
Fax (209) 485-7427
Telept~one (209) 485-8310
Telephone (209) 732-8857
Telephone (805) 327-0671
Telepl~one (415) 462-4000
Preliminary Tank ~e Assessment
301Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
July 21, 1989'
Page 2
SOIL SAMPLING
Soil sampling was performed on June 27 and 29, 1989 in the
presence of Mr. Bill Starkey of the Kern County Environmental
Health Department (KCEHD).
Soil samples were obtained from depths of two and six feet
beneath the dispenser island and from locations approximately
one-third of the tank distance in from each tank end. A backhoe
was used to retrieve a large, relatively undisturbed mass of soil.
from each test location. A clean stainless steel tube was
driven into the soil mass to obtain the samples. The samples
were capped with aluminum foil and pressure fitted plastic caps
and sealed with adhesive tape. Each sample was affixed with an
adhesive-backed label including sampling locations, depth of
sample, time of sampling, and the initials of the individual
preparing tile sample.
The samples were stored in an insulated ice chest, packed with
dry ice for preservation, and transported to the BSK & Associates
California certified laboratories in Fresno, California for
chemical analyses.
A Chain-of-Custody form was prepared to accompany the samples
recording the name of the individuals collecting, transferring,
and analyzing the samples. A copy of the Chain-of-Custody record
is included.
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING
Laboratory testing was performed by BSK & Associates'
Laboratories in Fresno, California. Soil samples were tested for-
the presence of Total Volatile Hydrocarbons (TVH), Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), and Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, and
Ethylbenzene (BTXE). Tile ~es~ing program was directed by the
KCEHD.
The ~ests for TVH ane BTXE were performed in accordance with EPA
Test Methods 8015M and 8020, respectively. The headspace method
of soil sample preparation was utilized. In the headspace
methoe, five grams of soil are heated to 90 degrees centigrade
for a.period of one hour. A one milliliter vapor sample is
obtained and injected into a chromatograph for aromatic
separation. TVH is measured with a flame ionization detector
(FID). BTXE is measured wi~h a photoionization detector.
The test for TPH is in accordance with DHS-approved procedures
for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. The sample is
prepared by he×ane extraction prior to chromatographic
separation. TPH is measured with an FID.
Test results are enclosed and summarized in Table I.
BSI<
& Asso~:i;{i,
Preliminary Tan, k Site Assessment
301Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
July 21, 1989'
Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary analytical test results indicate no detectible levels
of the tested constituents in the soil samples obtained from
beneath the leaded gasoline Sank.
The two-foot soil sample obtained from the southern end of the
unleaded fuel storage tank (Soil Sample. B-2) contained detectible
levels of hydrocarbon constituents. The six foot sample obtained
from tile same sampling 1.ocation and the two soil samples obtained
from the northern end of the tank (Soil Samples A-2 and A-6)
indicate no detectible levels of tested hydrocarbon
contamination.
Chemical analyses of the soil samples obtained from beneath the
fuel dispenser island indicate low levels of tested constituents
in the two-foot sample and relatively higher concentrations in
the six-foot sample.
LIMITATIONS
Findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on
the data obtained from the samplin9 locations shown on the Site
Plan and the soil sample analytical results. The report does not
reflect variations which may exist between sampling points.
These variations cannot be anticipated nor can they be entirely
accounted for in spite of exhaustive additional testing.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practices for the area, based on the
guidelines of local an State jurisdictions. No warranties,
either expressed or implieo, are made.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
Mark F. Milward
Staff Geologist
IDS/MFM/ds
Enclosures
BSK
& Associa(~
Or--I ZZOJZ
xl
~-I
NI r~ r~ cOn
r-~ rm [~ C2
Z~
, & Associate~
BSI<
Associates
, Geotechnical Consultants, In JUN Z 6 1989
May 25, !929
~V~RONMENTAL HEALT~
OUR JOB B88325
Mr. Toln Hart
Hopper, Incorporated
Post Office Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
SUBJECT'
Soil Contamination Investigation Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hart:
The following response references comments made by the Kern
County Environmental Health Services Department in their letter
of May 11, 1989 regarding the subject Soil Contamination
Investigation. Our responses are keyed to the County's comments.
1. Gas Chromatographic (GC) analysis used for testing Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) graphically presents separation
of aromatic hydrocarbon components and their qualitative
amounts. Contamination from a source such as paint thinner
may be confirmed by relative amounts of indicative aromatics
associated with that contaminant. BSK & Associates
engineers and chemists would review the chromatograms and
present conclusions regarding the chemical separation of the
hydrocarbon compounds.
2. Soil samples would be obtained at 5-foot intervals. The
initial soil sample would be obtained 10 feet below the
ground surface. Sampling would continue during the first
...,, test boring until field conditions at the site have
~,'"~ =indicated the depth of the vertical extent of soil
cOntamination or to a maximum depth of 100 feet, whichever
'- ....... is less. Soil samples selected for laboratory analysis
~ould be chosen to depict the representative concentration
profile of the contaminant plume. We would attempt to
obtain at least two clean samples for testing below the zone
of contamination to confirm the depth of contamination. A
portable photoionization detector would be used to assist in
soil screening.
Soil Engineering - Engineering Geology - Engineering Laboratories* Chemical La~ratories
Fresno, California 93706 i~4~ "E" ~lre,'i, Still(.' 105 ~lephone (209~ 4§S-3200
Fax (2095 485-7427
.._ Fresno, Ca t .ma 957(;t~ 'ti. ~,:n,.;:iu~ Street '~lephone (209) 485-8310
Vi~alia, Cain(~rma 912~ ~l)~ F. Dou~i~ Av,:m,,:' ~Iepi~ne (209l 732-8857
Bakersfield, C~htornia 933u4 ]17 "¥"" ~t~ee! ~elephone (§05i 327-0671
Pleasanton; California 945~6 5~29-F Sonoma Drive · lelephone (415) 462~000
Soil Contaminati:
Investigation 'AO¢)ndum
301 Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
May 25, lgSg
Page 2
Safety measures that would be employed to protect BSK &
Associates' personnel at the site would include protective
clothing, hats, boots, and gloves· Respirators may or may
not be used depending on the BSK & Associates project
engineers or geologist's evaluation of site conditions and
readings from the portable photoionization detector. A
copy of BSK & Associates Health and Safety Plan for this
project is included for review·
Contaminated cuttings would be stockpiled at the site and
covered with plastic sheeting. Disposal of the cuttings
would be the responsibility of Hopper, Incorporated through
an arrangement with a qualified waste hauler.
We feel our responses to the County's comments are sufficient to
satisfy their concerns. If you have further questions, please
call.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
Mark F. Milward
Staff Geologist
MFM/ds
BSK
& Associate,
Soil Contaminati~(
Investigation '~udendum
301 Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 1
HEALTH AND SAFETY
BACKGROUND
Based on the Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment,
substances that may be encountered include petroleum based
hydrocarbon compounds. Moderate to high levels of Total Volatile
Hydrocarbons and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons were tested in the
soil samples. Moderate to high levels of hazardous petroleum
constituents, including Benzene, Toluene, Xylene., and
Ethylbenzene may be exposed to the drilling and sampling crew,
EMERGENCY CONTACTS AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Kern County
Health Department
(8o5)
861-3636
Highway Patrol,
Police Department,
Ambulance, Paramedics
and Poison Control
911
The field crews should be aware of the location and telephone
number of the hospital closest to the site. The hospitals in
Bakersfield are:
~£~pital
Bakersfield Community Hospital
Address ~l..~e£hone No.
901 Olive Dr. 399-0311
Bakersfield Memorial Hospital
420 34th St.
327-1792
Kern Medical Center
1830 Flower
326-2000
Mercy Hospital
2215 Truxtun
327-3371
BSK
& Associat,
Soil Contaminati!
Investigation Aadendum
3D1 Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR dOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 2
General Procedures:
BSK & Associates employees working on this project must comply
with the procedures set forth in this Health and Safety Plan and
with safety procedures discussed by the Health and Safety Officer
(HSO) prior to start of work. It is virtually impossible to
anticipate all conditions on the site and health hazards
beforehand. Field crews must accordingly exercise common sense
and good judgement in their comportment on the job and in the
approach used in a given situation. This plan contains rules,
guidelines and working procedures appropriate to the tasks at
hand. Field crews shall follow the Health and Safety procedures
in this plan. Should there be questions, advice and direction
should be sought from the HSO.
Medical Screening:
BSK & Associates personnel working on this project must maintain
the BSK & Associates medical screening program and undergo a
medical evaluation on a six-month interval. The purpose of the
medical examination is to monitor personnel health status for
evidence of project adverse health effects and for personnel
suitability for future work assignments of similar activity.
Health and SafetZ Officer (HSO):
The Health and Safety Officer for this project shall be Mark F.
Milward.
The HSO is given the authority for the following actions:
- Require health and safety precaution prior to site
entry by BSK Personnel.
Require BSK Employee to obtain immediate medical
attention.
Deny access to the site.
Order the immediate evacuation of BSK Employees from
the site.
BSK
& Associat~
Soil Contaminati(
Investi§ation Addendum
301Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 3
If an emergency involving actual of suspected personal injury
occurs, the HSO will follow these steps:
Remove the exposed or injured person(s) from the
immediate danger.
Render First Aid, if necessary.
personnel.
Decontaminate affected
Obtain paramedic service or ambulance transport to
local hospital. This procedure should be followed even
if there is no visible injury.
Other personnel on site should be evacuated to a safe
distance until the HSO determines that it is safe for
work to resume. If there is any doubt regarding the
condition of the area, advice of knowledgeable personnel
should be sought. (See emergency contacts and
telephone numbers).
A written report of the incident must be forwarded to
the Project Manager, or HSO designee, within
twenty-four hours following the incident.
Personnel Protection:
The nature of the work is such that potentially hazardous
conditions could be encountered. It is not possible to
anticipate the required protective equipment for unforeseen but
remote conditions. The potential for airborne contamination is
low to very low. Unless field conditions change, Level "D"
protection is considered adequate for this project. Splashing,
immersion and unexpected inhalation of chemicals are not
anticipated.
Items specified below should provide the range of protection
anticipated for the working conditions and standby equipment
(respirators) for unanticipated Level "C" protection.
Gloves:
Inner: surgical type (vinyl disposable)
Outer: Chemical protective, neoprene or nitrile.
BSK
& Associah.,
Soil Contaminati(
Investigation Addendum
3'01Espee Street and
311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR dOB B88325
May 25, 1989
Enclosure 4
Protective Clothing:
Tyvek, Saranek-coated, zippered coveralls.
Footwear:
- Disposable shoe covers, PVC.
Eye Protection:
- Safety Glasses with sideshields.
- Goggles.
Hard nat with attachable face shield.
Medical Oxygen
Respirators:
Half-mask air-purifying chemical cartridge respirator
with an organic vapor cartridge(s) and dust, fume and
mist filter(s}, including pesticide respirators which
meet these requirements.
The HSO will ensure that appropriate protective clothing and
equipment is in use during field activities.
At the end of the day, outer protective clothing should be
removed and stored in impervious bags. Disposable clothing
should be disposed as directed by the HSO.
~~_~pment:
The HSO will have certain safety items immediately available
on-site. These items include:
First Aid Kit, including compresses, splints, gauze,
triangular bandages, gauze roller bandage, tape, eye
dressing packet, emetics.
Supply of clean water.
Portable eyewash facilities or equipment.
- Masking or fiber tape.
Indelible marking pens.
BSK
& Associate-
'Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 3
Q. What are the feasibilities, risks, and cost analyses of
remediation alternatives?
REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES (Espee Site)
Espee Site Information:
Results of our assessment suggest that the maximum depth of
significant hydrocarbon contamination (TVH greater than 100 mg/kg
and BTXE greater than 1 mg/kg, respectively) occurs less than 60
feet beneath the ground surface at the location of the removed
tanks. Relatively minor concentrations of the more mobile
aromatic constituents occur to a depth of less than 70 feet.
The lateral extent of soil contamination, based on test results
of samples obtained from Borings B-5 and B-6, is less than 65
feet from the location of the removed tanks. The volume of
hydrocarbon contaminated subsurface soil may range from 10,000 to
17,000 cubic yards.
NO ACTION ~OV~~~4~-
Description:
This action would involve leaving the present contaminated soil
in place. We would suggest that the backfilled area of the
removed tanks and surrounding areas be paved with asphalt or
concrete. Paving would insulate the zone of contamination from
human activities on the surface and would inhibit to some extent
surface water from percolating into the subsurface and leaching
contaminants downward.
Feasibility:
Potential concerns to be considered when weighing a no action
alternative include:
1) Will no action result in substantial increase of airborne
contaminant emissions?
2) Will it result in contaminant discharge to underlying
groundwater?
3) Will it cause known adverse effects on the environment or
to human health?
The constituents of gasoline include highly volatile components
which may'transform to the gas-vapor phase and migrate through
soil to the atmosphere. In this case, the top of the contaminant
plume may be as deep as 10 feet below the ground surface. Also,
BSK
& Associates
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 4
the addition of a surface cap would greatly reduce the risk of
airborne emissions.
It can not be forseen whether the existing contaminant plume
would continue its downward migration into groundwater. Current
Kern County Water Agency estimates on depth to groundwater
beneath the site is 175 feet. The source of leakage has been
removed eliminating continued suppply to the subsurface. Factors
evaluated in the Leaching Potential Analysis indicate that the
potential risk of groundwater impact is low. Economic
feasibilities of alternative remediation options (listed below)
highlight "no action" as a valid consideration at this site.
Health Risk:
Health risks regarding potentially hazardous waste are normally
considered in acute (short term) and chronic (long term) effects.
The short term risks for this site appear to be low. The
subsurface contamination has likely existed in its present state
for a number of years without a known report of adverse health
effects resulting from it.
Determination of the occurrence of health effects due to chronic
exposure is difficult and requires additional investigation
regarding the toxicologic properties of the contaminants. A
thorough environmental risk assessment would conform to standards
of practice of an industrial hygiene survey conducted by a
Certified Industrial Hygienist.
Cost Analysis:
Minimal costs would be encountered with a no action optio
EXCAVATION
Description:
This method would consist of excavating contaminated soils for
either treatment on-site by bioremedial "land farming" or aerated
to the atmosphere.
Excavation of the contaminated soil would require a large
diameter bucket auger drill rig. A number of deep columns of
soil would be removed throughout the zone of contamination and
backfilled with a cement slurry mix.
A slope-sided excavation, utilizing a clam-shell is not considered
feasible. The dimensions of the excavation to remove this much
material would extend a great distance disrupting facility
operations.
BSK
& Associates
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 5
Feasibility:
Space at the site may be suitable to set up augering, cementing,
and trucking equipment. Because of the relative cohesionless
nature of the soils, temporary casings may be required to
stabilize the augered excavations.
Conditions associated with sloped-wall excavations are avoided
with the bucket auger method. Vapor emissions are reduced.
Safety around the site is increased with the absence of a large
open pit. Shoring is eliminated. Over-excavation is not
required. Backfilling and compaction is minimized.
We understand that a Pacific Gas & Electric main trunk line
occurs beneath the site through a portion of the zone of
contamination. PG&E's easement along this main line may inhibit
feasilbility of soil excavation.
Cost analyses, summarized below, seriously limits the economic
feasibility of excavation at this site.
Health Risk:
Health risks involved in excavation of gasoline-contaminated soil
include fire potential, release of volatile organics to the
atmosphere, and potentially harmful exposure to site workers.
Cost Analysis:
Included costs are a rough estimate that may be typical of
similar sites:
- Excavation Costs: $100,000 to $200,000.00
- Bioremediation: $200,000.00
- Surface Aeration: $75,000.00
- Backfill $100,000.00
- Miscellaneous and Contingencies: $50,000.00
Estimated Total Costs: - Bioremediation Option
- Surface Aeration
$450,000 to $550,000.00
$325,000 to $425,000.00
IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION
Description:
Bioremediation is a proven technology for hydrocarbon cleanup in
many instances. In this case, bacteria designed to break down
hydrocarbon compounds would be introduced through a number of
injection wells until contaminant concentrations are reduced to
acceptable levels.
BSK
& Asso~:i~e~
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 6
Feasibility:
The time necessary to remedy the site using in-situ
bioremediation would depend on subsurface soil conditions,
hydrocarbon concentrations, and types of introduced bacteria.
State and local permitting may be necessary for this type of
remediation.
Health Risk:
Minimal health risks would be encountered due to limited exposure
to the subsurface contaminant plume.
Cost Analysis:
An in-situ bioremediation program may range from $20 to $50 per
cubic yard of contaminated soil. For this site, costs may range
from $200,000 to $850,000. Firms specializing in bioremediation
should be consulted for site-specific costs.
SOIL VENTING
Description:
Vented casings are placed in borings throughout the zone of
contamination. Volatile components of the contamination are
removed by an air pump attached to the casing which evacuates the
soil gases into an appropriate filtration and disposal system.
Feasibility:
An appropriate soil venting system is designed and operated in
accordance with site specific subsurface conditions to maximize
contaminant removal effectiveness. At this site, where
subsurface soils may contain fine-grained sediments, an enhanced
system may be utilized by pumping re-circulated air through
injection casings and drawing that air through production
casings.
In-situ air stripping has been shown to be an effective method of
hydrocarbon remediation in many instances.
Health Risks:
Limited exposure to workers.
Cost Analysis:
Depending on the extraction system used, and specific site
subsurface conditions, a soil venting remediation program could
range in cost from $50 to $100 per cubic yard for an estimated
total cost at this site of $500,000 to $1,700,000.
BSK
& Associates
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 7
REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES (KENTUCKY SITE)
Kentucky Site Information:
Significant concentrations (TVH greater than 100 mg/kg and BTXE
greater than 1 mg/kg, respectively) occur at a maximum depth of
less than 40 feet below the ground surface beneath the location
of the removed tank. Minor concentrations of aromatic
constituents occur less than 70 feet below the surface.
The lateral extent of significant soil contamination is less than
20 from the removed tank location. Lesser concentrations of
contaminated soil occurs between 20 and 35 feet away from the
tank.
The volume of significantly contaminated soil is approximately
600 to 1800 cubic yards. Lesser contaminated soil may comprise a
volume as high as 5400 yards.
NO ACTION
A "no action" option may be considered for this site. The
leaking source has been removed. Based on the reported depth of
groundwater and the current vertical depth of soil contamination,
as well as the other factors identified in the Leaching Potential
Analysis, the risk of impact to groundwater quality is low.
Although the contaminant plume would remain in place, there is
some evidence, based on field observations, which suggests that
in-situ natural bio-degradation may already be proceeding.
However, the time necessary for complete or adequate natural
bioremediation cannot be determined.
If a no action option is chosen, we would suggest that the
backfilled area and surrounding areas be paved to insulate the
zone of contamination from human activities on the surface and
inhibit surface water percolation.
Health risks, feasibility, and cost analyses for no action at
this site are similar to the Espee site.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Other remediation options listed and described for the Espee site
are technically feasible for the Kentucky site. Some difficulty
would be encountered excavating soils adjacent to the facility
building.
BSK
& Associates
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 8
Economic feasibility for those options are limited due to high
costs compared to the relative value of the property.
Remediation costs based on the volume of total contaminated soil
are summarized below.
Excavation with Surface Bioremediation: $250,000.00
Excavation with Surface Aeration:
$175,000.00
In-Situ Bioremediation:
$150,000 to $250,000.00
Soil Venting:
$270,000 to $540,000.00
LIMITATIONS
Findings and conclusions presented in this addendum are based on
data obtained from the test borings conducted in accordance with
the Characterization of Soil Contamination performed at 301 Espee
Street and 311 Kentucky Street (JOB B88325, dated September 7,
1989)
Opinions expressed regarding health risks concerning the
subsurface soil contamination are intended to be an overview of
potential health problems that may be encountered. This report
is not intended to take the place of a thorough risk assessment
which should conform to standards of practice of an industrial
hygiene survey conducted by a Certified Industrial Hygienist.
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practices for the area, based on the
guidelines of local and State jurisdictions. No warranties,
either expressed or implied, are made.
Respectively submitted,
BSK & Associates
IJ~hn_B. Moor~
ICivil Engineer
MFM/JBM/wp
Attachments
cc: Mr. Tom Hart, Hopper Incorporated
BSK
& Associates
CONTAMINATION CONFIGURATION CROSS-SECTION
301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 1990
Attachment A
10
20
30
Vertical
Depth
40
50
6O
7O
B-6
B-5
Test Borings'
B-2 B-3 B-4
FORM 135
7O
60 50 40 30 20
Horizontal Distance
From B-2
10 0 lg 20 30 40
Siqnificant Contamination
(Total Volatile Hydrocarbons,
Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, and
Ethylbenzene greater than 100,
1, 1, 1, 1 mg/kg,-respectively)
BSK
& Associates
' o
0
(J
0
o
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCA {[L. EY
Director
R E S 0 U R C E ,,~_"~,~..~,. N
DEPART~~MENTAL
May 14, 1990
2700 II Streel, Suite 300
Baklflfleld, CA 93301
Telepho~e (MS) 661.3636
Telecopief (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
Tom Hart
Hopper, Inc,
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, CA g3303
Subject:
301Espee Street, 311 Kentucky Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit Numbers: 060014, 140012
Dear Mr. Hart:
This Department has reviewed the site characterization report and the
associated addendums for the above referenced facilities.
Three remediation alternatives are discussed for each site in these reports,
but a selection of the most appropriate one has not been made by either Hopper or
their environmental consultant, BSK and Associates. Based upon these reports,
further information is necessary before the "no action" remediation alternative can
be considered for either site. In particular a Health Risk analysis must be
performed in order to determine if the contamination may be allowed to stay in
place without any adverse effects. In addition it will be necessary to accurately
determine the depth of groundwater at these sites before closure in place can be
considered. This must be done by placing groundwater monitoring wells.
These wells must be placed in the areas indicated on the enclosed plot plans
and tested for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), benzene, toluene, xylene and
ethylbenzene (BTXE). In addition, the Espee site must be tested for Naphthalene
using EPA method number 610. A sample of the groundwater from each well must also
be obtained and analyzed for the above constituents.
If either of the other remediation alternatives are selected, a detailed
engineering report describing the chosen method and how it is to be implemented at
this site must be submitted to this Department.
You have 15 days to notify this Department as to which of the remediation
alternatives you have selected. Within 30 days you must submit a workplan for
implementing the chosen remediation alternative.
If you have any questions, or concerns, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
iL:cas
Sincerely,
~ue~m~:terials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
-N-
Scale:
FUEL
ISLAND
1,,=10,
BUILDING
[ PAD ~ I [ PAD ]
· ~ ~ PAD1
OYERtlE^D ·
LINES
~ KB-3
BUILDING
~ KB-4
SITE PLAN
SOIL CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZATION
HOPPER, INCORPORATED
311 KENTUCKY STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFO~]IA
OUR JOB B883
August, 1989
Figure 1
METAL
FABR i CAT I ON
YARD
.PG&~
UNDERGROUND
LINE
I I REMOVED
·l 10,000 Gal.
~'-TANKS _
I /
PAINTING AND
STEAM CLEANING
r~.B~-2 ' -- _. ~ BUILDING
AND TANKS
~'~-" U N D E ~-'O'-~O'TJ [ I D
B-3
(Appro~
Scale:
1"=20'
SITE PLAN
SOIL CONT~IINATION CIIARACTERIZATION
IIOPPER, INCORPORATED
'301ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFOrnIA
BSK
& AssOciates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS -,'.ew~o · ,~,~,., · eAKe~W~m · ~l^s~oN
& Associates, o
~-- ~ ' Ge te hnic I ; ~[~ ~'~
Geotechnical Engineering * Engineering Geology * Environmental Engineering * Engineering Laboratorie~ ~he~~/~
March 20, 1990 OU
Department of Environmental Health Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Attention: Ms. Janis Lehman
SUBJECT: Site Characterization Addendum
Hopper, Inc.
301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms-. Lehman:
We are providing information which you have requested
(correspondence dated March 8, 1990) regarding Hopper's Site
Charaterization report and initial addendum (BSK & Associates JOB
B88325, dated September 7, 1989 and February 2, 1990,
respectively) for the Espee Street location. You questioned
items contained in those reports which you feel do not adequately
characterize the contaminant plume at that site. Our responses
to your concerns correlate to numbered items included in your
letter.
1. You question our assumption that the vertical extent of
contamination would be greatest at the location of Test
Boring B-2. That boring was situated over the former
location of the removed 350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks. You
base your concern on the previous existance of two 10,000
gallon fuel tanks that were in the vicinity, and higher
levels of s0il contamination detected at similar depths in
Test Borings B-3, B-4 and B-5 than what was found in samples
obtained from Boring B-2.
Preliminary soil contamination investigations, consisting of
sampling and testing soils obtained beneath the 350, 550,
and the two 10,000 gallon fuel tanks were conducted by BSK
prior to the Site Characterization. Results from those
investigations indicated relatively high contaminant levels
beneath the 350 and 550 gallon tanks and minor or no
contamination found beneath the 10,000 gallon tanks.
there are other point sources at the site that we are
unaware of, we base our assumption that the plume of
contamination originated from the smaller two tanks.
Unless
Fresno, California 93706 ~ 1645 "E" Street, Suite 105 * Telephone (209) 485-3200, Fax (209) 485-7427
Fresno, California . 1445 "F" Street . Telephone (209) 485-0100
Fresno, California 93706 ~ 1414 Stanistaus Street * Telephone (209) 485-8310
Visalia, California 93291 · 808 E. Douglas Avenue · Telephone 1209) 732-8857
Bakersfield, California 93304 * 117 "V" Street * Telephone (805) 327-0671, Fax (805) 324-4218
Pleasanton, California 94566 - 5729-F Sonoma Drive * Telephone (415) 462-4000, Fax (415) 462-6283
Sit9 Characterization Addendum
Hopper/301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B89325
March 20, 1990
Page 2
You stated that contaminant levels are higher at similar
depths in the lateral borings B-3, B-4 and B-5 than those
found in Boring B-2. In fact, Total Volatile Hydrocarbon
concentrations are lower at similar depths in the lateral
borings than Boring B-2. However, aromatic constituent
concentrations are somewhat higher-in the lateral borings.
As you are aware, hydrocarbon transport in the subsurface
can be complex. Hydrocarbons can occur in several different
phases and movement of constituents depend on physical
properties of those compounds, along with the properties of
the soil matrix.
Review of Test Hole Logs for the site borings indicates
lateral soil changes from Boring B-2 to the other borings.
We suggest that the higher constituent concentrations in the
lateral borings are a result of the mobility characteristics
of the aromatic constituents combined with lateral
variations of soil materials.
2. BSK will notify your Department of proposed changes to the
Site Characterization Workplans before implementation.
3. The leaching potential analysis characterizes conditions
which influence downward migration of hydrocarbons. The
subsurface conduits which we refer to in our initial
addendum are laterally placed utility lines. We do not
consider that these structures are capable of increasing
vertical migration of leachate.
4. Vapor phase migration of hydrocarbons along the subsurface
conduits is a potential risk. We understand that most of
the Hopper facility is paved, and that risk of vapor
emission is reduced. 'However, environmental hazards have
been shown to occur in cases where hydrocarbon vapors have
emitted into unventilated buildings or structures. If a
"No Action" remediation alternative is selected for this
site, then potential lateral migration of vapors along
subsurface conduits should be investigated more fully.
BSK
& Associates
Site Characterizat~on Addendum
Hopper/301 Espee Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B89325
March 20, 1990
Page 3
If you have questions concerning the information included in this
letter, please call.
MFM/wp
cc: Mr. Tom Hart, Hopper Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
BSK & Associates
Ma~F. Milward~
·
'Civil En 3ine~r
BSK
& Associates
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Dlreclor
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
R ESOU RC E ~~iE,..,~. NT
DEPART':':'~NMENTAL
·...: ,;
March 8, 1990
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
Mark Milward
BSK and Associates
117 "V" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93304
Subject:
Hopper Underground Tank Site Assessments
Permit #'s 060014 and 140012
Dear Mr. Milward:
This Department has reviewed the site characterization report addendum dated
February 2, 1990, for the above referenced facility.
There are several concerns regarding both the addendum and the report which
this Department feels have not been adequately addressed. They are as follows:
The assumption is made in the Espee report that the vertical extent of
contamination is going to be greatest at the location of B-2. B-2 is
located near the area of the 350 and 550 gallon fuel tanks. It is
approximately 20 feet from the center of either of the 10,000 gallon
fuel tanks and up to 40 feet away from the farthest ends of these
tanks. Borings B-3 and B-4, which are approximately 10 feet away from
eastern 10,000 gallon tank both had levels of contamination which at
similar depths as B-2 far exceeded the levels of contamination detected
in B-2. In the site characterization report, and in your response to
our letter dated January 16, 1990, you state that B-3 and 4 were
drilled to determine the vertical extent of contamination plume. This
Department is not satisfied that the vertical extent of contamination
can be based on the results of boring B-2, since B-3, B-4 and the
boring B-5, located approximately 40 feet from B-2, all show higher
levels of contamination at similar depths than B-2.
Part of this Department's requirement for a site characterization
workplan is a site map which details any drilling obstacles, such as
overhead or underground utility lines, structures, etc. As you have
learned from this site, the attention to detail when preparing this map
is very important in order to insure that the workplan indeed can be
implemented. In the future BSK and Associates must be careful to
detail any drilling obstacles in their workplans. This Department
realizes that unforseen circumstances can cause field changes in
drilling plans, but following the requirements set forth in Handbook
#35 will minimize these field changes. Also, this Department must be
notified of field changes prior to their implementation.
Mark Milward
March 8, 1990
Page 2
e
In the discussion of the leaching potential analyses for the Espee
site, it is stated that there are no man-made conduits. As per your
response in the addendum as to why the boring locations were changed,
you state that there are underground conduits. The leaching potential
analysis should be corrected.
e
The discussion of the "no action" remediation alternative fails to
discuss vapor migration along the underground conduits.
The addendum containing the above information must be submitted to this
Department within 15 days.
Should you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Janis Lehman
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:cas
\milward.ltr
:BSI(
Geology * Environmen~Engi ' ' 'n~ ~oratories * Chemical Laboratories
Geotechnical En,iheerin, * En,ineering
Februa~ 2, 1990
Depar~ent of Enviro~ental Health se~ices~
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Attention: Ms. Janis Lehman
SUBJECT:
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Ms. Lehman:
At your direction (correspondence dated January 16, 1990), we are
providing information regarding Site Characterizations of 301
Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street in Bakersfield, California.
These sites were subjects of soil contamination characterizations
we performed for Hopper, Incorporated (OUR JOB B88325, dated
September 7, 1989). This addendum contains information that you
have requested to complete your review of the sites and
correlates to questions you raised in your correspondence.
Attached figures representing cross-section configurations of the
zones of contamination may be reviewed for additional
information.
Q. Why were test boring locations changed from those originally
proposed?
Our initial Kentucky Street Test Boring KB-1 was originally
intended to be located directly over the center of the removed
tank. Prior to our field investigation, we were told by a Hopper
representative that overhead utility services situated above the
tank could be temporarily shut down while we worked. As you are
aware, OSHA enforces required distances that machinery such as a
drill rig mast may operate adjacent to overhead utility lines.
As we prepared to initiate our work, the facility foreman
reported to us that shutting the line down would seriously
inhibit their operations. Subsequently, we located our initial
test boring as close to the removed tank as possible without
sacrificing safety to the drill rig and to our workers. Other
test borings were also located away from the overhead lines to
provide a margin of safety.
Fresno, California 93706 - 1645 "E" Street, Suite 105 . Telephone (209) 485-3200, Fax (209) 485-7427
Fresno, California . 1445 "F" Street * Telephone (209) 485-0100
F~'esno, CaJi~brnia 93706 - 1414 5tanisJaus Street · Telephone (209} 485-8310
Visalia, California 93291 . 808 E. Douglas Avenue * Telephone (209) 732-8857
Bakersfield, California 93304 - 117 'V' Street . Telephone (805) 327-0671, Fax {805) 324-4218
Pleasanton, California 94566 * 5729-F Sonoma Drive , Telephone (415) 462-4000, Fax (415) 462-6283
Site Characterization Addendum
301 Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street
Bakersfield, California
OUR JOB B88325
February 2, 1990
Page 2
Kentucky Street Test Boring KB-2 was originally intended to be
situated 10 feet from KB-1. However, we placed Boring KB-2 about
20 feet from KB-1. Our intention was to place the next Boring
KB-3 10 feet from KB-1 if field observations and field
instrumentation (photoionization detector) indicated
contamination conditions absent in Boring KB-2. In fact, field
conditions suggested contamination in subsurface soils from
Boring KB-2 so we situated Boring KB-3 farther away from the
removed tank location.
Some Test Boring locations at the Espee site were changed based
on information concerning underground utility lines and
improvements that was not known at the time of our original
workplan review. Other changes reflected field decisions based
on observations of site conditions and field instrumentation
readings. Often during these types of investigations, subsurface
conditions not forseen at the time of workplan submittal dictate
decisions made in the field.
Q. Why was Espee site Boring B-3 terminated at 26 feet?
Espee site Test Boring B-3 was intended to indicate lateral
extent of soil contamination from the leaking underground tanks.
Field observations and instrumentation readings indicated that
Boring B-3 subsurface soils were contaminated at 25 feet.
Laboratory analysis confirmed our field observation. Based'on
that criteria, Boring B-3 was terminated so that subsequent
borings might be drilled to determine the lateral extent of
contamination.
Q. Why were samples not retrieved at the termination depths of
Espee site Borings B-4 and B-57
In fact, soil samples were retrieved from those borings. However
it was decided that testing those particular samples were not
necessary to indicate lateral extent of contamination. As you
noted, previous samples from those borings were tested and
confirmed that contamination had migrated laterally at least that
far.
Q. Are there other possible sources of subsurface contamination
at the Espee site?
There is no additional information that we are aware of which
would indicate the possible existence of other point sources at
the site.
BSK
& Associates
p 106 683 046
RECEIPT FOR CERTiFiED MAil-.
¢ ,N~u~ANC£ OOVE~AG[ pRO.¥lgED
' J' OT cO~ iN;EF, NAItONAL MAIL
~ Postma~ or Date
3800, June 1985
33
Ill
("3
m -13
'~le(] JO '~EUJisod
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, California
Mailing Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636
eERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPAR'TME~I
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
December 5, 1988
HEALTH OFFICER
LeonM Hebe~son, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
Victor Hopper
P. O. Box 2900
Bakersfield, California
93303
Dear Mr. Hopper:
Upon inspection and investigation of underground hazardous
substance storage tanks located on the Hopper facilities at 30t
Espee Street and 311 Kentucky Street, this department has
determined that there may be a significant amount of soil
contamination present at these sites and that said contamination
would present a threat to the environment and the groundwaters of
the state.
You are hereby Ordered to perform a preliminary assessment at
the above referenced facilities within ? days from receipt of this
Notice and Order. This assessment shall incorporate the excavation
of the tank tops, the use of a slant drilling rig for soil sample
retrieval, the classification of the soils encountered, and the
analysis of the samples by a State Certified hazardous waste
laboratory. A copy of these test results must be submitted the
Kern County Health Department within 3 weeks from the date of this
Notice and Order. The drilling date for the soil sample retrieval
must be confirmed with this department within 3 days from the
receipt of this Notice and Order. The two specific areas of
concern, and the specific scope of work for this pro3ect are as
follows:
Areas of Concern:
Location 1:
301Espee Street, Bakersfield
Center underground fuel storage
filled with cement. (See map one)
tank
Location 2:
311 Kentucky St., Bakersfield
Apparent underground fuel tank east of the
generator shed. (See map two}
Victor Hopper
December 5, 1988
Page 2
Scope of work: 1. In the presence of a representative
from the Kern County Health Department, the top six inches of the
tanks must be exposed within 24 hours prior to drilling in order
to determine the direction in which the tanks lie and their burial
depth.
2. The samples must be retrieved by a
drilling rig that has both angle drilling capacities and a
continuous flight hollow stem auger with a split spoon sampler.
It will also be advantageous to retain a drilling rig that will be
small enough to maneuver under the canopy at 301Espee Street.
3. Samples must be retrieved at a minimum
of five and ten feet below the tank bottoms, one-third of the way
in from each end, and also any other requested by the Kern County
Health Department. It will be necessary to slant drill these
borings so that samples may be retrieved underneath the tanks.
At the location on Espee Street, a vertical boring must be
advanced in an area between the canal and the underground hazardous
substance storage tank. The boring must be not more than ten feet
from the tank and to a depth of. approximately 40 feet. Samples
must be retrieved for analysis every ten feet or more frequently
if the soil type or apparent contaminant concentration should
change.
Sample locations may be modified in the field only with Kern
County Health Department approval.
4. The soils encountered during drilling
must be classified by an experienced geologist utilizing the
Unified Soils Classification System.
Victor Hopper
December §, 1988
Page 3
5. The samples must be collected by
qualified personnel, such as a technician from a laboratory, and
a split of the sample must be provided to the Kern County Health
Department.
6. The soil samples must be analyzed for
benzene, toluene, zyiene, ethyl benzene, and total petroleum
hydrocarbons (using both a diesel and a gasoline standard).
The above required scope of work is necessary for the.proper
initial assessment of contamination at both locations, and based
on the evaluation of the results by the Kern County Health
Department and appropriate state agencies, further work in site
assessment and characterization may be necessary.
If you have any questions, please call either Richard
Casagrande or myself at (805) 861-3636.
We look forward to your cooperation with this project.
JL:cas
Sincere~ . .
Environmental Health Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Progra. m
12-5-88\Lehman\Hopper2
HoDper~ ina ...
50t ~sp~ =~
I~o.p one.
.Ho.p +uoo ,
(not- a~'~
RESUURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY
RANDALL L. ABBOTT
DIRECTOR
DAVID PRICE I!!
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Enviror~nental Health Set~ic~ Department
STEVE McCA! ~ ~=Y, REHS, DIRECTOR
Air Pollution Control District
WILLIAM J. RODD¥, APCO
Planning & Development Sen~ce~ Department
TED ~IAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
March 5, 1991
TO:
SUBJECT:
Mike Yraceburn, Deputy DA
District Attorney's Office
Chris Burger, R.E.H.S.
Hazardous Materials Specialist IV
Environmental Health Services Department
Hopper, Inc.
Attached for your review and action as you deem appropriate is a
report of our activities and findings as a result of a complaint
received regarding Hopper's waste storage and disposal practices.
Approximately $3,200 in costs have been incurred during this
investigation. We would, of course, be interested in recovering
this amount in addition to or as a part of any settlement of this
matter which you may achieve.
Upon reading the report, should you have questions or need further
information please feel free to contact Dan Starkey (extension 5?9)
or me (extension 578) at 861-3636
CB:jg
Enclosure
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636
CLAIM FOR PAYMENT
COUNTY OF KERN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CLAIM OF Hopper, Inc. DATE 5/'3/90 DEPARTMENT Environmental Health
ADDRESS P. 0. Box 2900, Bakersfield, CA 93303
SOCIAL SECURITY OR
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANT: FEDERAL TAX ID NO.
(1) CLAIMS MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CLAIMANT AND APPROVED BY THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONI'ROLLER
(2) CLAIMANT PERFORMING SERVICES TO TWO OR MORE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS MUST MAKE SEPARATE CLAIMS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT
(3) CLAIMS FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAVEL EXPENSES MUST INCLUDE A STATEMENT OF THE PURPOSE OF COUNTY BUSINESS.
14) NO CLAIMS WILL BE AUDITED OR ALLOWED UNTIL THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET.
19 o'~--'~J' DESCRIPTION DOLLARS CENTS
REFUND ON PERMIT #060015-0-90 - TANKS WERE REMOVED
DATE OF DEPOSIT 4-24-90
AROD #10790
DEPT #4113 REVENUE #3398 FUND #00001 12C O0
TOTAL ~ 120 00
The undersigned, under penoily of perlury, stales: That the above claim and Ihe Hems are thereto sel oul are Irue and correct. Ihol aa porl thereof has been herelo.
fore pa~d; that lhe omounl lherein is juslJy due; and lhat Ihe same is presented hal later thor, one year ofler the accrual of lhe cause of achon.
D~name - · Fp YOUR name here.
FOR FILING STAMP ONLY
BELOW FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
Expenditure Authorized and Aporoved "~?'~,~'~ DE R E ' ~
SUPERVISOR
7-15 j
j 4113 ~
oo9t
008 014 00341 J
011 Government Code Refund
If cs slo~ed, above ~s o LEGAL CHARGE ago,ns,
Counl,~ for ~he sum Ot S
County Counse[
Audited and Allowed
Auditor-Controller
By:
AUDITOR CONTROLLER
Dole
E,o Code
102
102/
102t
102/
..... J 006
&
&
&
PY
& & & &
& & & &
& ,& & &
WORKSHEET FOR CLAIM FOR PAYMENT
REFUND PAYABLE TO
ADDRESS:
AMOUNT TO REFUND
RECEIPT NO.
DATE RECEIVED
TYPE OF FEES
0010
REASON FOR REFUND
SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL
ACCOUNTING SECTION:
DATE OF DEPOSIT
AROD NO.
DEPT. NO.
REVENUE coDE NO.
FUND NO.
/17
Permlt~T~~
Environmental Seneltl~-lty
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STOR.
e ~NSPECT~ON REPORT
.Uc per' .- Inc...' Addreee f,O J
~_~ Is ln[ormatlon on Permit/Application Correct? Yes/m~.'' No
Routine t-~'~ Complaint
Facility Name
No, of Tanks
Type of Inspection:
Comments:
Ye8 e~' No m
Permit Posted?
Relnspectlon
ITEM VIOLATIONS NOTED
1, Primary Containment Monitoring:
a. Intercepting and Directing System
Standard Inventory Control Monitoring
c. Modified Inventory Control Monitoring
d. In-Tank Level Sensing Device
e. Groundwater Monitoring
f. Vadose Zone Monitoring
2.Secondary Containment Monitoring:
a, Liner
b. Double-Walled Tank
c. Vault
3,Piping Monitoring .
a. Pressurized
,'b'} suction
c. Gravity
................................................................ 7 r-7 7--7---~? ...... L---~-TT~- - ~'-~777';..~
./4~ Overfill Protection ' '/'72 ' ": /' f' // ? '~ ~ ~'' ~ / "*~': '"/' ' '
5. Tightness Testing
6. Ne~ Construction/Modification
7. Closure/Abandonment
8. Unauthorized Release
t) Maintenance, General Safety and
Operating Condition of Facility
:' , ;r-',,_/,'L ;, ;' I0 , ', ~,' ,' ,i-/',',. (/0:~,' ~?.'",')'/ .. .'/ ,', ,,
Relnspectlon scheduled? ~ Yes ~'~"~No Approximate Reinspectlon Date
WATER RESOURES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER'QUALITY
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY REPORT
CONTRACTOR NO:
SITE NO:
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
15000 SOURCE OF FUNDS:
060014 FEDERAL EXEMPT:
HOPPER INC.
301 ESPEE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
SITE JTATUS
F SUBSTANCE: 8006619
N PETROLEUM: Y
DATE REPORTED: 03/10/89
DATE CONFIRMED: 03/10/89
MULTIPLE R.P's: N
CASE TYPE: S
CONTRACT STATUS: 9
RP SEARCH: S
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT: C
REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION: C
REMEDIAL ACTION: C
POST REMEDIAL
ACTION MONITORING:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
TAKEN:
LUFT FIELD MANUAL CONSIDERATION
DATE UNDERWAY: 03/16/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 04/04/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 05/25/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 03/20/90
DATE UNDERWAY: / /
TYPE:
EMERGENCY
RESPONSE:
DATE COMPLETED: 03/21/89
DATE COMPLETED: / /
DATE COMPLETED: 03/20/90
DATE COMPLETED: 01/02/92
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE TAKEN:
2, H, S, C, A, R
(CATEGORY 1, 2, 3, PLUS H, S, C, A, R, W, G, OR O AS APPLICABLE)
CASE CLOSED: Y DATE CLOSED: 01/07/92
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED: / / REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: NA
RESPONSIBLE PARTY ......
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE ;:
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE *:
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE #:
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
~TTV/7TD~
TOM HART
HOPPER, INC.
P. O. BOX 2900
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93303
--
( ) -
SPECIALIST: 6
SENSITIVITY: ES
ABANDONMENT ~: A 921-06
DATE OF REPORT: 01/07/92
LEAK REPORT: Y
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE #:
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
PHONE ;:
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY/ZIP:
2700 M S~ree~
Bakersfield, California
Mailing Addre~:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
MONITORING WELL APPLICATION
.\MOUNT PAID: .... ~_.~.Z_._5_.. .......................
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
/
!
FAC'[L[TY NAI, I[ .~./..~..~_~ --~-.~__¢_c'.,_- ~ ....................
.:~ATE ........................... ~,.~,..~_/~/_7 .... ~ J~ ~ ~_,_~ ..........
':'~DD'D~ ...... A O O R E ~ S .............................. ~_~ ......... ~.T ..... ~cF~_~ .............................
.~.TARTING OA~ E
ENVIRGNMENTAL CONTRACTOR
........ ,,;ORESS ..........................
COMPLETION OATE
LITHOLOGY LOGGING REViE,EO BY: .... ~__ /~,~
~EDTH TO GROUNONATER
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebe~taon, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reich-rd
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT
(CIRCLE ONE)
CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT,
DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL
APN:
HOME PHONE NO.
NORK PHONE NO. _..~i.l._L_~_l .~_~- ...............
LICENSE NO. "~-~0
PHONE NO. '--j'~'~-'c--'D-~"?
LICENSE NO..__~_~_ ......................
RHONE NO.
uN APPRO~cu [T~o ~ ~ ~0
REGiSTRATiON ~:.._~___ ~ .......
TO
.,08 SITE: T 2~ $ R ~CJ.3 ~ ,SEC. Z. '~ ,~0 ACRE SUB._ ..... ~'-_ ...........................................................................................................
,DIRECTIONS TO WELL o~TF-: .... ~. _'~/oCA"s ~--,~,~: c~ /_z_-'~,_a%_*.t ..... _~_ ...... _~..~.-_,..!.~..~. ............ ~,..~_.
CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT:
2. ~ell site approval is reouired before beginning any work related to well construction. It is lawful to
continue work oas~ the staoe at which an insoection is required unless inspection is ~aive~ or comoieted.
Other reouired insoections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features.
ohone c.`i' -' -; :~oartment ,'.'-'m is reouired on the morning of toe day that work is to commence arc
hour. .e p~acement o' ~ais or plugs.
5. Jonstru. ~ unoer this --',- is suoject _.. any insEructions by Oeoartment representatives.
6. Any misrepresentation or :un-compliance ,ith required Permit Conditions, DP Ordinance will result in
issuance of a "Stop Work Order."
- A cody of the 0eoartment of Water .... Jources. iller. ~eoort as wei', as copies of logs and water ouality
analvses must be submitted tc ~ne .ealth 0eoartmen.. thin ': days after completion of the work.
well destruction aoolicatio? must be fileo with tr,-,s 0eoarE:';ent if a well is being destroyed that is not
in conjuction ~itn a test hole oePmi[.
The oermit is ...;id on the ninetieth (§0) calendar day after cate of issuance if work has not been starre~
and reasonaDte orogress ~oward comoletion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
10. i h~ve rea0 and agre~ to ,c~.mDiy with the General Conditions noted above. ,
ff-d ?¢
OWN.R o SIGNATURE OATE CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE
~PPlIR~TT~N ~PPROVEO BY:
OATE
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
2700 M Street
Bal:er~field, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALT~I DIVISION
Mailing Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636 / / ~.
Z~AZARDOUS MAT___ER I AL_~S
HANAGEMENT PROGRAM
~ONITORING WELL APPLICATION:EE ~ID Y;S ~ N0 ~ ~
/
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR
:R'ODUS~ ........... .~OORESS 71 7 V -~ ~--~
::OMDLETION DATE ........... 2 ............ _~.. R~'Z~(~I~;~_~"'_7--~"~]
.ITHOLOGY LOGGING REVIEHEO BY: .............. ~ .......
DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER & ;LOb DIRECTION DERFORMEO
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hel)eft.on, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S, Reicherd
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT
(CIRCLE ONE)
CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT,
DEEPEN OR DESTROY A WELL
CT..Z::F G
APN:
HOME PHONE NO.
WORK PHONE NO.'"2_'~'_~f % ,',,77 / 8'd/- ...........
t. iCENSE NO. 4~O
PHONE NO. "--~2~~ ...................
ON A P P R 0 V E O'-1,]'i'~' ,"-~--7::"~'0"
LICENSE NO. ~0 ~Z.. .............
PHONE NO~ -
ON APDROVED~I5I ~ YEa '( ) N~ ...........
REGISTRATION ~:
REGISTRATION ~:
TO
,OB SITE: T Z ~2 5 R ~,":"-- SEC..30 ~.O ACRE SUB.. .......
· DIRECTIONS TO ~ELL 3ITF:: ...... _._./~£/.- ~C~.~._ e~ L../~.~,,,,.:,,
~ENERAL
i.
6.
7.
3.
g.
~o comoi_y with the General Ccnditions noted above. ,
' F ' ~'~ ~" '" ' ~'S
OWN_R S o~.~NA,URE DATE .,uNTRAC O~ SIGNATURE
APPLICATION APPROVED BY:
CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT:
~ell site approval is reauiPed before beainnina aflv work ¢elated to well coDstruction. It is lawfui to
continue work east the stage at which an ~nspec~ion'is reouired unless inspection is waived or completed.
3~he¢ rem~iPed inspections include: conductor casing, ali annular seals and final construction features.
A prone call to (he Oeoartment office is required on the morning of ti~e day that work is to commence and
2~ hours before the placement of any seals or plugs.
ConstructicF , der ~his Permit is subject to any instructions by Oeoartment representatives.
Any misneDresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, on Ordinance will result in
issuance of a "Sto¢ Work Order."
A c9oy of the Oeoartmen~ of Water Resources Driller's Report ,:,~ 4ell as copies of logs and water Quality
analyses mus~ be ~ubmiCteO co the Health Oeoartment within ...~ys after completion of the work.
~ well destruction application must be filed with this Oeoartment if a well is being destroyed that is not
in conjuccion ~itn a test t~oie permit.
The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day al(er date of issuance if work has not been started
and reasonaote progress Coward com¢letion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable,
OATE
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALtEY
Director
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
'Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
t¥
HAZARDOUS M
MANAGEMF2~
MONITORING
- MW0137--06
0138-06
OWNER'S NAME: Hopper Industries
FACILITY NAME: Hopper Industries
FACILITY LOCATION:
DRILLING METHOD:
CONTRACTOR: B.S.IC & Associates
TYPE OF MONITORING WELL(S) Test Holes
NUMBER OF Wgl.l_q REQUIRED TO MONITOR FACILITY:
DATE: 7-$1-8~
301 Espee Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
Hollow Stem Auger
UC~SE #: 490942
(2) Two
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF 2Ills PERMIT:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful to continue work past the stage at which
an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed.
Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final construction features.
A phone call to the Deparunent office is required on the morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hou~ before the pl~cemetl£ of
any semis or plugs.
Construction under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives.
Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP WORK ORDER."
A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submitted to the
Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work.
A well destruction application must be files with d~is Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit.
The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date if issuance if work has not been started and reasonable progress toward
completion made. Fees are not refundable nor :ransl'erable.
I have read and agree to comply with the Genei'al C~,nditions noted above.
SP~ (]DN1)rHONS: 1.
2.
Approved Annular S,'ai Depth N/A.
Test holes shall be s~,aied with approved material from bottom to grade.
This permit must be signed by either die contractor or owner.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE
CON'I'RA(YI'OIVS SIGNATURE DATE
PERMIT APPROVED BY: Dan Slarkey
DATE: 7-31-89
DS:cd
starkeykhopper.mw
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 881-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESO
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
MONITORING WF.U.(S) PERMIT
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakerlfleld, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3638
TelecolMer (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
PERMIT- MW0137-06
0138-06
OWNER'S NAME: Hopper
Industries
FACILITY NAME: Hopper Industries
FACILITY LOC. A~ON:
DRIII,ING MEI'HOD:
cos'n~croa: B.S.IC & Associates
T~r_ OF MONIrOmNa W~U.(S) Test Holes
NUMBER OF Wl~l.l_q REQULRED TO MONITOR FACILITY:
DATE: 7-31-89
301 Espee Street. Bakersfield. CA 93301
Hollow Stem Auger
UCF~S~. #: 490942
('2) Two
GENEIIAL ~ONDITIONS OF THIS PEIIMIT:
]o
2,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Well site approval is required before beginning any work related to well construction. It is unlawful W continue wor~ p~t the stage at which
an inspection is required unless inspection is waived or completed.
Other required inspections include: conductor casing, all annular seals, and final col~rucflofl
A phone call to the Department office is required on die morning of the day that work is to commence and 24 hours bet'o~e
any seals or plugs.
Gonsrruedon under this Permit is subject to any instructions by Department representatives.
Any misrepresentation or non-compliance with required Permit Conditions, or Ordinance will result in issuance of a "STOP woaK ORDF.1L"
A copy of the Department of Water Resources Driller's Report as well as copies of logs and water quality analyses must be submiued to the
Health Department within 14 days after completion of the work.
A well destruction application must be files with this Department if a well is being destroyed that is not in conjunction with a test hole permit.
The permit is void on the ninetieth (90) calendar day after date if issuance if work has not been started and reasona~:ie progress toward
completion made. Fees are not refundable nor transferable.
I have read and agree to comply with the General Conditions noted above.
SPECIAL ~ONDmONS: 1.
2.
Approved Annular S,~al Depth _N_/~.
Test holes shall be ~:aled with approved material from bottom to grade.
This permit must be signed by either the contractor or own::;'.
OWNER'S SIGNAIIJRE DATE
CON'HIACI'OR'S SIGNATURE DJk'lTg
PFdlMIT APPROVED BY: Dan Starkey
DATE: 7-31-89
DS:cd
starkeyXhopper.mw
450, O0
· ~, '.30. ' ;;
ANNUAL
TREND.ANALYSIS
S UB4bXAR~F
QUARTER 1
PERIOD 1:
PERIOD 2:
PERIOD 3:
QUARTER 2
PERIOD 4:
PERIOD 5:
PERIOD B:
QUARTER $
PERIOD ?:
PERIOD 8:
PERIOD 9:
to .
TIME PERIOD:
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
TIME PERIOD: ----- to
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4).
,/-3- to =,"-?- Ye
TIME PERIOD: ----- to
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
QUARTER 4 TIME PERIOD: ~ to
PERIOD I0: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
PERIOD 11: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
PERIOD 12: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Linei4)
Z hereby certify this is a true and accurate repor?-~.:i'
ANNUAJ ' ~.END - ANALYS I S ~ ilWOklRY
TANK # ,~- TIME PERIOD: /--3-- ~>~ to .~/_,f_ ~F
QUARTER ! /_.~_ ~F tO Y-/- O~ '
PERIOD 1:
PERIOD 2:
PERIOD 3:
QUARTER 2
PERIOD 4:
PERIOD 5:
PERIOD 6:
QUARTER 3
PERIOD 7:
PERIOD 8:
PERIOD 9:
TIME PERIOD:
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
TIME PERIOD: ~ to
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
:,~
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)!
Action Number for this Period
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)'?';.
Action Number for this Period (Lin~i.i
TIME PERIOD: -- roi
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)'
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
QUARTER 4 TIME PERIOD: to
PERIOD 1'0: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
PERIOD 11: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)
Action Number for this Period (Line~4)
PERIOD 12: Total Minuses This Period (Line 3)'
Action Number for this Period (Line 4)
I.hereby certify this is a true and accurate repOrt'?
Signature '~?Date
Note:
2.
3.
4.
5.
All meters must have calibration checks,a minimum of twice a year, which may.
Include Checks done by the Department of Weights and Measures.
Before starting calibration runs,' wet the': calibration can with pr°duct and'
return product to storage.
Run 5 gallons with ;nozzle wide ·open into the' can.' Note gallons and .cubic·
Inches drawn, and return product'to storage.
Run 5 Eallons w.tth 'the. nozzle one-half, open Into t~e can'. No~e gallons and
cubic·inches drawn', and'return product to storage.'
After all product for one calibration check Is returned'to. storage, remember
to record the Volume returned to storage In column 9 of the Inventory
Recording.Sheet.
6.. If the 'volume measured in .a 5-gallon calibration can is more than 6~ cubic
Inches above or below the 5~gallon mark, the meter requires calibration by a
registered device repairman.
Date/Time
Hose Z{Product
orlTank ~/
Pump
/
Fast Flow
5-Gallon Draft
Ga~s Cu. Inches
Slow Flow
5-Gallon Draft
Cu. Inches
-3-
Volume Returned
to Storage
Gallons
/5-
nee or operator Slgnatur __~~.
Calibration
Required?
Yes 1:
Oevice Repairman
Used for
Calibration
Registration # ~/
. Da.te of
~a'l lbrat t,
Record of Computer Change, Met~r Change, or Calibration
-" i' .x7
.~ ... r. . ~..'.' MONEY OALtO,,~S.
. I ' MON~
REAOINGS. ·
~O~T ' ' : ~ U ~ GALLONS RE~RNEO TO STORAGE
~gS/'~'. ..~.P: TOTAL
. ... . I.g, 0
l:.-?:.j..'f -....~.-..... ·
.........,. :. ~., ..
.'.EAD,.G~ : s.'.T /
~.C,' :'...'-':' pump
~ATE
3, - ?-?r>
CHECKED
FAST I SLOW
CHECKED"
CALIBRATION
TO I'ALIZER SEAL J:D
Q YES
ADJUiTED TO
FAST SLOW
IMETER S Ead,.EO
D NO
_ I II II
CALIBRATION
I .~JUSTEO ._o
o.o
4. KE AND MODEL ·"
. . ..... · . .:.,.. "..'.'.:': ::::..
. :... -:
MONEY ..
:"::?'"'::?i:i"!:::'';'''~'::''' :: =FINISH · '
'.TOTALIZER ' :""' .
',READINGS . I ~ '
i : ..; :;" " ,' ..... '.'
SERIAL NUMBt. I[ ·
GAl.
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
]SLOW
I
'1 U rA;:IZER __
READINGS.
m c;(,"G ;:T --
FINISH
MONEY
u_( ~.IAL NUMBI R
START
GALl. OHS Rf I'URNFU TO :;1ORAGI;
SERIAL NUMBER
·CALIBRATION
CHECKED
ADJUSTED TO
FA31 [~LOW
MEtLR ~LAL~U
CALIBRATION
I I
'"TOTALIZER
''READINGS
P~D~T · ...-.
FINISH
8TART
MONEY
QALLONS
GALLONS
GALLONS RETURNED TO STORAQE
CHECKED · ADJUSTED TO
TOIALIZER SEALED METER S. EALED
[] ,Es O .o El ,E, D .o
i{' ~TOTALIZER
; .'d/.REA'DiNGS
SERIAl. NUMBi, H . .
GALLUNS
' START ' '.
Pump #' TOTAL '-
RE TURNEO TO STORAGE
CALIBRATION
CHECKED ADJUSTED TO
I 01AI. IZEH SFAL ED MET ER SEALED'
0,- .. O.D. 0,~ [].o
MAN S ~IUNAI UIIN.
J
0
0
0
CD L~
0
0 (~
OCOMPUTER CHANGE
OMETER CHANGE
FINISH
TOTALIZER
READINGS "~'Y
START
,,,o,~CT Vump # TOTAL
Record of Computer Change, Meier Change, or Calibration
TOTALIZER
READINGS
~ODUCT
FINISH
START
Pump #
MONEY
k4ONEY
TOTAL
G~L~S RE~RNED TO STORAGE
Io.o
GALLONS
TOTAUZER
REAOINGS
1 U f ALIZER
READINC~$
FINISH
START
Cump '~
FINISH
START
Pump #
MONEY
MONEY
TOTAL
MCJNE v
TOTAL
GALLONS RETURNED 10 STORAGE
&ND MODEL
FINISH
TOTALIZER
REAOINGS
START
LOATE
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
CHECKED
ADJUSTED TO
FAST 1 SLOW
METER SEALED
CALIBRATION
ADJUSTEr) TO
METER SEALED
IOtAt IZER SEALED
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
.................. -wl'~ ......... ]SLGW FASt'
/
f OTAtIZER SEALED UETER
'- OYES D~o DYEs
ADJU.~ TED TO.
III
CALIBRATION
III
CHFGKEU
- I
ADJUS1 ED TO
__L~LOW
Mkltg ~LALtU
CALIBRATION
CHECKED * ADJUSTED TO
13ALLONS TOIALIZER SEALED METER SEALED
0 ,ES O .o O YE, 0 .o
TO STORAGE
TOTALIZER
READINGS
FINISH I'ONEY
START
Pum~
CALIBRATION
CHECKED ADJUSTED TO
GALLONS I'FAST !~o. FAST St OW
GALLONS IIOIAI.IZL# ~c ALEIJ
I
MAINTE. NANCE MANS SIGNATURE