The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMITIGATION 12/17/1991BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130~'~G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM OWNER 3o~h ' ~,c.~ ~ I ~/gz ~PERMIT TO OPERATE# CONTRACTOR ~. ! .~ ! CONTACT PERSON P~ / LABORATORY TEST METHODOLOGY PRELIMANARY ASSESSMENT CO. CO2 RECIEPT # OF SAMPLES ;-?z~- ~-'~t/ CONTACT PERSON LEL% ~3 O~% PLOT PLAN CONDITION OF TANKS CONDITION OF PIPING CONDITION OF SOIL 'COMMENTS ' DATE INSPECTORS NAM~_~/ / ~ ~IGNATURE BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2138 G Street,'Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF TANK DECONTAMINATION I, ~//,---:'/~, /~~,~./~ an authorized agent of~ name contracting co. perjury that the tank(s) located at ~/ ~ro~~ ~ address here by fattest under penalty of and being removed under permit# has been cleaned/decontaminated Properly and a LEL (lower explosive limit) reading of no greater than 5% was measured'immediately following the cleaning/decontamination process. name (print). s~gnature ~ JAB~ 1 3 1993 L~ By. . HAZARDOUS CITY b f BAKERSFIELD "~,~ c~" MATERIALS DIVISION FIRE DEPARTMENT S. O. JOHNSON FIRE CHIEF BUSINESS NAME ADDRESS: ~/0/ ~'RO~ECT DESCRI~'TmN.' TIME CHARGED 2101 H STREET BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 TIME DATE: NAME: CHGD: COMMENTS: /1 /I 1¢-7-qb /o.7~ o21,/ FIRE DEPARTMENT S.D. JOHNSON FIRE CHIEF CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" November 16, 1992 2101 H STREET BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 John M. McCauley California Sheet Metal 4293 Country Club Drive Bakersfield, CA 93306 Dear Mr. McCauley: The site assessment report, received on September 23, 1992, for the California Sheet Metal facility located at 601 Eureka Street has been reviewed. This report, completed by John R. Wilson and Associates, recommends additional testing be accomplished in order to assess the full extent of the contamination plume. We concur! Furthermore, it is recommended that the hydrocarbons in the soil (as gasoline) be removed using vapor extraction. With the submittal of a satisfactory corrective action plan, meeting all of the requirements of Section 2725(c) Article 11, Title 23 CCR, it is anticipated that vapor extraction would be found an acceptable means of mitigation. The next step must be to complete the sampling necessary to define the full extent (both vertical and lateral) of the contamination. These results as well as a corrective action plan must then be submitted to this office.- The high concentrations of product in the soil indicate a good likelihood of plume migration. It is important that you proceed in a timely manner to minimize the risks to the environment, as well as, the overall economic aspects of the clean-up. Sincerely yours, ~dE~uHsU~Yaterials coOrdinator REH/ed r cc: Gary J. Leary GJL Environmental 4009 Fairwood Street Bakersfield, CA 93306-1310 STATE OF CALiFORNiA - CALiFORNiA ENVII PROTECTION AGENCY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS 2014 T STREET, SUITE 130 P.O. BOX 944212 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2120 (916) 739-2475 John & Deanna McCauley 4293 Country Club Drive Bakersfield, Ca 93306 NOV UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FUND. CLAIM NO. 000802 :'ETE WILSON, Governor The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) takes pleasure in issuing this Letter of Commitment in an amount not to exceed ~ 10,000. This Letter of Commitment is based upon our review of the corrective action costs incurred to date and your application received on January 17, 1992 and may be modified by the State Board in writing by an amended Letter of Commitment. You are encouraged to read the terms and conditions listed in the Letter of Commitment. Also attached is a "Reimbursement Request" package. The package includes: Instructions for the completion of the "Reimbursement Request" form and should be followed when seeking reimbursement for corrective action costs incurred after January 1, 1988. A "Reimbursement Request - Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund" form which you may use to request reimbursement of costs incurred, if you are going to be requesting more than one reimbursement (i.e. reimbursements for costs on an on-going basis), make sure you obtain copies of the form for future requests. A "Combined Voucher Register and Expenditure Distribution Journal" (Spread Sheet) which you may use in conjpnction with your Reimbursement Request. sample of a completed Reimbursement Request form and a samPle of a completed spread sheet. "Bid Summary Sheet" to document data on bids received. A "Certification of Non-Recovery From Other Sources" which must be returned before any reimbursements can be made. This Letter of Commitment may be withdrawn at any time by the State Board if you do not proceed with c?_r_re~ct_(v?_e .a~ion_~__wi~th.r=easonable_ dil/_g_en~c_e_..~Rea~s.o, nabl_e diligencemeans-that_you must.take positive, concrete - - steps to ensure that corrective action is proceeding with all due speed. At a minimum, you must comply with all regulatory agency time schedules and requirements. We will periodically review the status of your activities and failure to proceed with due diligence will be grounds for withdrawal of this Letter of Commitment. If you have any questions regarding the Letter of Commitment or the Reimbursement Request package, please contact Barbara Andersen at (916) 739-4315. Sincere/y, Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Program CC: Bakersfield City Fire Dept.- Hazardous Materials D/v/sion 2130 G Street Bakersfield, Ca 93301 A TTN: Joseph A. Dunwoody LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS CLAIM NO: 000802 AMENDMENT NO: 0 CLAIMANT: J. & D. McCauley BALANCE FORWARD: $0 CO-PAYEE: None THIS AMOUNT: $10,000 CLAIMANT ADDRESS: 4293 Country Club Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93306 NEW BALANCE: $10,000 TAX ID / SSA NO.: 551-48-6648 Subject to availability of funds, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Boardl agrees to reimburse John & Deanna McCauley (Claimant) for eligible corrective action costs at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 (Site). The commitment reflected by this Letter is subject to all of the fo/lowing terms and conditions: Reimbursement shall _no_t__ex__cee~d_~ l_O, OOO..u~ess. this. amount_is..subsequently:modified in ~writing-by an-amended Letter of Commitment. The obligation to pay any sum under this Letter of Commitment is contingent upon availability of funds. In the event that sufficient funds are not available for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the State Board, the State Board shall not be obligated to make any disbursements hereunder. If any disbursements otherwise due under this Letter of Commitment are deferred because of unavailability of funds, such disbursements will promptly be made when sufficient funds do become available. Nothing herein shall be construed to provide the Claimant with a right of priority for disbursement over any other claimant who has a similar Letter of Commitment. Unless modified in writing by the State Board, this Letter of Commitment covers work through Phase II of corrective action work. ,411 costs for which reimbursement is sought must be eligible for reimbursement and the Claimant must be the person entitled to reimbursement thereof. Claimant must at all times be in compliance with all applicable state laws, rules and regulations and with all terms, conditions, and commitments contained in the Claimant's Application and any supporting documents or in any payment requests submitted by the Claimant. No disbursement under this Letter of Commitment will be made except upon receipt of acceptable Standard Form Payment Requests duly executed by or on behaff of the Claimant. Ail Payment Requests must be executed by the Claimant or a duly authorized representative who has been approved by the Division of Clean Water Programs. Any and all disbursements payable under this Letter of Commitment may be withheld if the Claimant is not in CbT~/3i~b~w~i~l~ Th'~r~-~l~ibn--F-df-Pbra--gT~h--5 Neither this Letter of Commitment nor any right thereunder is assignable by the Claimant without the written consent of the State Board. In the event of any such assignment, the rights of the assignee shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth in this Letter of Commitment and the State Board's consent. This Letter of Commitment may be withdrawn at any time by the State Board if completion of corrective action is not performed with reasonable diligence. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Letter of Commitment has been issued by the State Board this 15th day of October., 1992. STATE WA TER R~OURCES CO~VTROL BOARD Manager, ,U~r, qround, Sto~age Tank Cleanup Fund Program Chief, Di¢ision Administ'ra)ve Services ~5'TATE U3E : [C.4I..ST,4RS CODING: I550 - 632.02 - 30530 DATE REQUEg, TEO: ACTION REQUIRED: DUE D, Post-Itv" brand fax tmh'~"mlttal memo 7671 '- **:sEND**~ NILSON & _ _,4Sc:_nI"IAT = CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING September 21, 1992 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 ,RECEIVED 2 ATTN: Mr. Joe Dunwoody HAZ. MAT. DIV. RE: Site Characterization California Sheet Metal 601 Eureka Street Bakersfield, CA Dear Mr. Dunwoody; Pursuant to the request of GJL ENVIRONMENTAL, we have attached a copy of the above referenced report for your review. On September 9, 1992 WILSON & ASSOCIATES mailed a copy of the above referenced report to your attention at the above address pursuant to the request of GJL ENVIRONMENTAL. If you desire additional information, please contact this office. Respectfully submitted, WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. cc: Gary J. Leary - GJL ENVIRONMENTAL 4009 Fairwood Street Bakersfield, CA 93306-1310 Mr. John McCauley 4293 Country Club Dr. Bakersfield, Ca 93306 Mr. Ralph E. Huey City of Bakersfield 2101 H Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Ms. Barbara Anderson 2014 T Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Suite 130, Claim #802 9-92/cashtrpt. 2E~17 "E" STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 (805) 323-64130 · FAX (805) 323-4723 PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOIL CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL 601 EUREKA STREET BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA~ PREPARED FOR: JOHN McCAULEY PREPARED BY: JOHN R. WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SEPTEMBER, 1992 2217 "E" STREET ° BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 (BO5) 323-6460 · FAX [805) 323-4723 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOIL CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... . ............... 1 1.1 Site Description .................. 2 1.2 Background ..................... 2 2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION- ............... 2.1 Drilling and Soil SamPling ............ 2.2 Laboratory Analysis ............... 3 0 FINDINGS 3.1 Geologic ................ 3 2 Subsurface Conditions 3.3 Hydrogeology ..................... 3.4 Soil Vapor Monitoring ............. , · 3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results ........... 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ................... 4.1 Remedial il~e~n~tives ............... 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............. ' ......... 6.0 CLOSURE .................. · ........ 9 9 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Typical Section A-A Site Plan Typical Section B-B APPENDIX A APPENDIX B Boring Logs Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-custody PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the result of a preliminary site characterization performed by WILSON .& ASSOCIATES, INC. (W&A) at the above referenced site. The purpose of the characterization was to assess the lateral and vertical extent of soil impacted by gasoline hydrocarbons associated with a former 550 gallon underground gasoline storage tank removed from the property on December 17, 1991 by CALPI, INC. of Bakersfield, California. A concentration of Total Purgeable Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline was detected at 810 mg/kg, and 10,000 mg/kg at depths of two and six feet beneath the former tank. Toluene was detected at 170 mg/kg, and 275 mg/kg at depths of two and six feet beneath the tank. See 'attached laboratory results. The concentrations of TPH as gasoline .and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics detected in the samples from beneath the tank are in excess of Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) recommended guidelines, and resulted in the Lead Implementing Agency (LIA) which is the City of Bakersfield Fire Department - Hazardous Materials Division requesting that an initial site Characterization consisting of soil borings and laboratory analysis of soil samples be performed to assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil in the vicinity of the former underground gasoline storage tank. The fuel dispenser was located directly above the tank, and therefore no additional soil samples were required at this location. The scope of work for this project developed in conjunction with Mr. Joe Dunwoody of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department - Hazardous Materials Division. In addition, remedial action alternatives are presented. Work performed to date includes the following: Development of site health and safety, and technical work plans. Drilling and sampling of six exploratory soil borings to a maximum depth of 90 feet below surface grade. Laboratory analysis of nineteen selected soil samples for Total Purgeable Hydrocarbons as gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics. Preparation of this report presenting our conclusions, recommendations, and remedial alternatives for the site. results, action PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 ~ PAGE NO.2 1.1' Site Description The subject site is located on the south side of Eureka Street in the City of Bakersfield, Kern County, California. The site was used as a commercial "Sheet Metal Facility". The underground fuel tank was used to provide fuel for the service trucks. The site is situated within a developed urban and commercial area. Nearby properties are primarily commercial businesses along both sides of Eureka Street, and residential areas to the south. The overall site topography is essentially flat. 1.2 Background Based on a review of analytical results, a 550 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, and dispenser located directly above the tank were removed under City of Bakersfield Permit Number BP0031 from the above referenced property. Reportedly, no soil was removed from the site during removal of the tanks. Soil samples were collected at depth of two and six feet from beneath the removed tanks. The samples from beneath the gasoline were'analyzed for the presence of total purgeable hydrocarbons (TPH) s gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics (BTEX). Gasoline was detected at 810 mg/kg, and 1,000 mg/kg at depths of two and six feet beneath the former tank. Benzene was detected in the two samples at 4.4 mg/kg and 98 mg/kg at depths of two and six feet. Toluene was detected at 170 mg/kg, and 275 mg/kg 'at depths of two and six feet beneath the tank. Ethyl benzene was. detected at 19 mg/kg, and 170 mg/kg at depths of two and six feet beneath the tank. The concentration of TPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics detected in the soil samples from beneath the tank are in excess of Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) recommended guidelines, and resulted in the Lead Implementing Agency (LIA) which is the City of Bakersfield Fire Department - HazardoUs Materials Division requesting that an initial site characterization consisting of soil borings and laboratory analysis of soil samples be performed' to assess the vertical and lateral extent of gasoline impacted soil in the vicinity of the former underground gasoline storage tank. The fuel dispenser was located directly above the tank, and therefore no additional soil samples were required at this location. ~ PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 PAGE NO.3 Based on these analytical results WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. has been retained by John McCauley to perform a site characterization in the vicinity of the former gasoline tank. Below are the results of the site characterization. 2.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 2.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling Prior to commencing field operations, a technical work plan was reviewed and approved by City of Bakersfield Fire Department - Hazardous Materials Division personnel. Underground Service Alert was notified 48 hours in advance of the site activities. Drilling commenced on March 19, 1992 using a CMET" B-75 truck mounted drill rig, operated by Soils Engineering, Inc. of Bakersfield, California, and equipped with six 3/4-inch diameter hollow-stem augers. The augers were steam cleaned prior to use to minimize the possibility of cross-contamination. A total of six borings were drilled within this phase of ~oi! characterization. One soil boring, B-1 was drilled through the approximate "center" of the tank excavation to a depth of ninety feet. A second soil boring, B-2, was drilled on the south edge.of the tank excavation to a depth of thirty feet. A third soils boring, B-3, was drilled southeast of the tank excavation to a depth of forty feet. The fourth soil boring B-4, was drilled southwest of the tank excavation to a depth of forty feet. Boring number five, B-5, was drilled northwest of the tank excavation to a depth of forty feet. The sixth boring, B-6, was drilled northeast of the tank excavation to a depth of forty feet. Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals in each of the borings using a split-spoon sampler (ASTM D 3550 with shoe similar to ASTM D 1586) equipped with three 6-inch by 2.5-inch diameter stainless steel sleeves for soil retention. The soil samples were obtained by driving the sampler with a 140-pound hammer dropping 30 inches in accordance with ASTM D 1586. PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION PAGE NO.4 CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL ,~SEPTEMBER 1992 The lowermost sleeve at each sample intervals was screened for '~total organic vapors with a photo-ionization detector (PID). Headspace vapor analysis was performed by first discarding a portion of the soil retained at one end of the sleeve to produce a headspace. The sleeve was then capped and the probe of the PID was inserted through a hole in the cap and into the headspace for analysis. The PID readings are recorded on the boring logs. The middle sample sleeve was immediately transferred to a glass jar, capped, security taped, labeled, and placed on ice.for transportation to a California Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified laboratory. Strict chain of custody procedures were utilized for all samples collected to ensure Sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time of collection to the final destination. Ail sampling equipment was washed with TSP (tri-sodium phosphate) cleanser, and rinsed with tap water and de-ionized water prior to sampling, between sample intervals, and between borings to minimize the possibility of cross-contamination. The drill auger was steam cleaned between borings, also to minimize the possibility of cross-contamination. Contaminated drill cuttings and soil sample spoils were stored in D.O.T. approved 55-gallon drums, sealed, and left on-site pending appropriate disposal. After drilling, the borings were backfilled with a 2 sack cement, sand, and bentonite clay grout to seal the abandoned boreholes. 2.2 'Laboratory Analysis Nineteen samples were selected for analysis based on: a) observations and greatest PID readings of odorous soil, b) observations and PID readings of the first encountered sampling locations containing apparently uncontaminated soils, which would serve to define the lateral and vertical extent of contamination, and c) requirements that the two lowermost samples of each boring which detects gasoline hydrocarbons be submitted foranalysis. The nineteen samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and total xylenes (BTEX) by the USEPA Test Method 8020, and total purgeable hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by the DOHS LUFT Manual Method. PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 PAGE N0.~5 3.0 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.1 Sub-Soil Conditions Regional Geology: The site is located in the southern part of the Great Valley. The Great Valley is a north-south trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide. Surface and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley is derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada mountain range to the east, and is transported by five major rivers, the southern most being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately three miles south of the Kern River. Site Soils: Soil deposits in the study area include alluvial sediments of the Kern River Formation, which dip to the southwest. "~The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly graded fan deposits. ~ The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer is approximately . 200 feet below surface grade beneath the site with the directiOn of groundwater flow to the south (Kern County Water Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1991 Report on Water Conditions, February, 1992). The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is 2 miles to the southwest at a depth of 20 feet in the abandoned Kern River channel to the ancient Kern Lake Bed(Kern County Water Agency, 1991 Water Supply Report, May, 1992). No perched groundwater is known to exist beneath the subject site. 3.2 Subsurface Conditions Subsurface material encountered during drilling included artificial fill in the former tank pit underlain by alluvium to the total depth of each boring. The artificial fill was encountered in the upper portion of boring B-1 from the surface to approximately 10 feet. The fill consisted of a medium brown, silty sand (SM). 3.3 Hydrogeology · "' ~' >. · Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings drilled during this project. The project to the regional unconfined aquifer is approximately 200 feet below surface grade beneath the site with the direction of groundwater flow to the south (Kern County Water Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1992 Report on Water Conditions, February, 1992). The nearest known of perched groundwater is 2 miles to the southwest at a depth of 20. feet in the abandoned Kern River channel to the ancient Kern Lake Bed (Kern PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 PAGE NO.6 County Water Agency, 1991 Water Supply Report, May, 1992). No perched groundwater is known to exist beneath the subject site. 3.4 Soil Vapor Monitoring Soil samples collected during drilling were monitored with a photo-ionization detector (PID) to evaluate organic vapor concentrations. The PID was calibrated with an isobutylene standard of 100 per million (ppm) and contained an 11.8 electron volt (eV) lamp, capable of detecting benzene (9.25 eV). Boring Logs presents the PID readings as they were recorded in the field. 3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results Boring B-1 was advanced through the center of the former 550 gallon tank where (TPH) as gasoline were detected at 6,000 mg/kg at 5 feet and 15 feet, at 3,100 mg/kg at 30 feet, at 3,000 mg/kg at 45 feet and 18,000 mg/kg at 60 feet. TPH as gasoline was not detected at 75 feet, 80, 85 and 90 feet. TPH wad detected in Boring B-2 at 12,000 mg/kg at 15 feet and at 400 mg/kg at 30 feet. TPH as gasoline was detected in Boring B-3 at 30,000 mg/kg at 25 feet. TPH as gasoline was detected in Boring B-5 at 7,000 mg/kg at a depth of 40 feet. TPH as gasoline was not detected at 30 and 40 feet in B-4, at 15 feet in B-5 and at depths of 20, 30 and 40 feet in B-6. " 'The gasoline constituent volatile aromatic benzene was detected in eight of the nineteen samples analyzed. Benzene was detected in; Boring B-1 at 5 mg/kg at 45 feet, 110 mg/kg at 60 feet and 0.084 mg/kg at 90 feet, Boring B-2 at 1,000 mg/kg at 15 feet' and 0.2 mg/kg at 30 feet, Boring B-3 at 400 mg/kg at 30 feet, Boring B-5 at 0.011 mg/kg at 35 feet and 42 mg/kg at 40 feet. Benzene was not detected in B-1 at depths of 5, 15, 30, 75 80 and 85 feet, B-2 at depths of 30 feet, and 40 feet, B-6 at depths of 20, 30 and 40 feet. Toluene was detected in thirteen of the nineteen samples. Toluene was detected in; Boring B-1 at 210 mg/kg at 5 feet, 390 mg/kg at 15 feet, 86 mg/kg at 30 feet, 160 mg/kg at 45 feet, 1,'300 mg/kg at 60 feet, 0.047 mg/kg at 85 feet, 0.16 mg/kg at 90 ~feet, Boring B-2 at 1,500 mg/kg at 15 feet, 1.2 mg/kg at 30 feet, Boring B-3 at 3,400 mg/kg at 25 feet, Boring B-5 at 0.017 mg/kg at 15 feet, 540 mg/kg at 40 feet, Boring B-6 at 0.008 mg/kg at 40 feet. Toluene was not detected in Boring B-1 at 75 and 80 feet, B-4 at 30 and 40 feet, B-6 at 20 and 30 feet. PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 PAGE NO.7 Ethyl benzene was detected in ten of the nineteen samples analyzed. Ethyl benzene was detected in; Boring B-1 at 50 mg/kg at 5 feet, 170'mg/kg at 15 feet, 71 mg/kg at 30 feet, 75 mg/kg at 45 feet, 300 mg/kg at 60 feet and 0.049 mg/kg at 90 feet, Boring B-2 at 340 mg/kg at 15 feet, 4.7 mg/kg at 30 feet, Boring B-3 at 800 mg/kg at 35 feet, Boring B-5 at 160 mg/kg at 40 feet. Ethyl benzene was not detected in Boring B-1 at 75, 80 and 85 feet, Boring B-4 at 30 and 40 feet, B-5 at 15 feet, B-6 at 20, 30 and 40 feet. Due to the presence of "gasoline" in the soil, selected Samples were analyzed for Lead. Lead was detected in B-1 at 5 feet at 39 mg/kg (TTLC) and 2.7 mg/1 (STLC), at 30 feet at 4.5 mg/kg (TTLC) at 85 feet at 4.5 mg/kg, at B-2 at 30 feet at 3.9 mg/kg, at B-6 at 20 feet at 3.6 mg/kg and at 40 feet at 8.5 mg/kg. Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for gasoline, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, recommended and total xylenes have been calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most stringent current federal' or state water quality standards by a: factor of 1,000 to account for attenuation due to site-specific parameters including vertical separation to ground water, soil lithology, fractures in subsurfaces, annual average precipitatioh,: and any direct conduits to ground water. The limits are 1,000 mg/kg for TPH as gasoline, 1.0 mg/kg for benzene and toluene and 50 mg/kg for ethyl benzene and total xylenes. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The data obtained from the field operations suggest that soil impacted with gasoline hydrocarbons, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics at concentrations in excess of RWQCB recommended guidelines exists at the subject site in the area directly beneath the former 550 gallon underground gasoline storage tank to a depth of 60-75 feet, and laterally of approximately 35 feet. The estimated volume of soil with concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in excess of 1,000 mg/kg, and volatile aromatics in excess a their respective recommended guidelines is 6,000 cubic .yards. PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION ~CALIFORNIA ~SHEET METAL. 4.1 . Remedial Action Alternatives PAGE NO.8 At least four options for remediation of the soil are applicable to the site 1) excavation and transportation of soil to an approved landfill or recycling facility, 2) in-situ vapor extraction, 3) excavation and uncontrolled aeration, and 4) 'no action. In the first action, impacted soil would be excavated and transported to a suitable disposal site or recycling firm. Due to the depth of the contaminated soil we believe that the existing means of excavation would not be suitable for this site. The next option is to treat the soil through in-situ vapor extraction. Wells are drilled into the impacted soil. The hydrocarbon vapors are extraction and treated as a unit such as a thermal oxidizer. We believe that three wells would effectively extract the gasoline hydrocarbons, and the time frame for successful treatment would be approximately six to nine months. The cost for installing the wells and below ground manifolding would be approximately $32,000.00. The monthly cost rental of an extraction unit will be approximately $8,500.00/month, or $42,5000 for five months, including the cost of electricity, and/or supplemental fuel. Verification, soil sampling and system abandonment would be approximately $17,300. Management fees including Work Plans, regulatory liaison, supervision, reports, etc. will be approximately $10,000. The overall cost is estimated to be $101,800. However, we believe that additional borings will be necessary to further define the lateral extent of the contamination. The third option is to excavate the soil and "aerate" on-site. Again due to the depth of the contamination we believe that excavation of the soil is not acceptable. The fourth option is to leave the site "as-is" and allow natural in-situ biodegradation to occur. Due to the high concentrations of gasoline and the gasoline Constituent volatile aromatic we believe that there is a "risk" of leaking hydrocarbons to groundwater, which is at a depth of approximately 200 feet. Long term monitoring of the hydrocarbons may be required at additional costs. ~ PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION CALIFORNIA SHEET METAL SEPTEMBER 1992 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS PAGE NO.9 WILSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. would recommend that two additional borings be completed in order to assess the lateral extent of the contamination. One boring would be located southwest of Boring B-3, and another boring would be located northwest of Boring B-5. At the completion of the laboratory analysis. W&A would prepare a Work Plan for implementation of a vapor extraction system. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the John McCauley as it pertains to the location of the former gasoline tank at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, California. The conclusions and recommendations,rendered are opinions based on information obtained within the scope of work authorized by the client. This report should not be regarded as a guarantee that no further contamination, beyond that which may have been detected within the scope of this study, is present on or beneath the site. If additional information regarding the possible presence or past use of hazardous materials at the site becomes available, then the need for further field investigation should be re-evaluated. Similarly, if suspected contamination is encountered during earthwork or construction activities, a qualified engineer or geologist should be on-site to monitor the soils and collect samples for laboratory analysis. Work has been performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in geotechnical and environmental engineering, engineering geology, and hydrogeology. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to be of servicel If you have'any questions regarding this report or the information contained herein, please contact this office at your convenience. ol oo I ,/ SITE PLAN ',, APpRoXIMATE LOCATION ', rA~ cxc~v,~rlo~ ~ / / / APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF CONTAMINATION. Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON' 323-6460 Date of Report: 03/30/92 Lab ~: 2517-1 Sample Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-5' (SOIL) 03'-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F-.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/19/92 Analysis Results Date Analysis Completed: 03/27/92 Reporting Units Benzene None Detected m~/k~ Toluene 210. m~/k~ Ethyl Benzene 50. m~/kg o-Xylene 360. mg/kg m & p~Xylene 600. 'mg/kg Total ~Petroleum Hydrocarbons' (gas) 6000. mg/kg Minimum Reporting Level 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 5000. .. Note: High'reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. 'Cal'ifornia D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisb~ 41 ['T~Atlas Cc. · E)ake~fi~ld, CA 9330F3 · (~] 327-491 I · FTC< (E3Ob~ 327-191E~ WILSON & ASSOCIATEs 2217 "E" STREET BD, KERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 123-6460 Date Reported: 03/30/92 Date Received: 03/19/92 Laboratory No.: 2517-1 Page 1 Sample Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-5' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TOTAL CONTAMINANTS .(Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) ' ' Regulatory Criteria Method STLC TTLC Constituents sample Results Units P.Q.L~ Method mq/L_ mq/kg Lead ; 39. mg/kg 4.0 SW-6010 5.0 1000. Comment: P.Q.L. = STLC = TTLC = Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on: an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals ' (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. Practical Quantitation Limit.(refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Tofal Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor .~ ~ rn ~t~ nt., I~l~ersfield. OA 9330~ · (EI(D~ 327-4~)1 I · FAX (b--~ZD~ 327-1 LABORATORIES APR 1 ? ]992 WlLSu~ & aa~OC./NC. WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON '323-6460 Date Reported: 04/14/92 Date Received: 03/19/92 Laboratory No.: 2517-1ADD'N WET TEST ExTRACT'COnTAMINANTS ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TITLE 22, /LRTICLE 11, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION Sample DescriptiOn: Constituents Lead (STLC) ,, PROJECT:..60Z EUREKA: 1-5' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 153'0 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON Sample Results mq/liter Method P.Q.L. Method 2.7 0'.5 SW-6010 Regulatory Criteria STLC Comment: P.Q.L. = N.D. = STLC = Ail metals reported above are in mg/liter on a filtrate basis (STLC). These results are based on extracting sample according to Title 22, Article 11, California Administrative Code using a 48-hour citric acid (deionized water for hexavalent chromium) extraction. Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (If constituent is present it would be less than the method P.Q.L. listed to the right. Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods"i SW 846, September, 1986. .~., ~ De nt Su~~U .,,~,, .-. , , ~ nn Afl,** a · R~kersfield. CA 937L'18 · fBOS_~l ,'-~L?'-7-491 I · FAX (8053 327-1918 ~,BORATORIES, WILSON &,ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON Petroleum Hydrocarbons 323-6460 Date of Report: 03/31/92 Lab ~: 2517-3 Sample Description: pROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-15' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual,constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: SoiI Date Sample Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received @ Lab: 03/19/92 Date Analysis Completed: 03/30/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 100. Toluene 390. mg/kg 10. Ethyl Benzene 170. mg/kg 10. o-Xylene 230. mg/kg 10. m & p-Xylene 960. mg/kg 10. Total Petroleum· Hydrocarbons (gas) 6000. mg/kg 2000. Note: High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor/ --~ m ,',r~=~ ~ · R~k'arsfield. CA 933L-)~ · [EL%~ 327-491 I · t::AX (Ek-b--)327-191B Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES .... 2217 "E" STREET . '-: :i BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 '' Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Sample Description: Date of Report: 03/27/92 Lab ~:' 2517-6 PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-30' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: Sample Matrix: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Soil Date Sample Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03119192 Date Analysis Completed: 03/26/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level Benzene None Detected mg/kg 2. Toluene 86. m~/kg 2. Ethyl Benzene 71. m~/k~ 2. o-Xylene 88. m~/k~ 2. m & p-Xylene 350. mg/kg 2. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 3100. mg/kg 500. Note: High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. Caiifornia D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor 410C3 Arias Ct. · E)akersfield, CA 93-Ckr~ · (E3(D~ 327~491 I · FAX (805) 327-1918 ~OF~ATO~IES WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Date Reported: 04/02/92 Date Received: 03/19/92 Laboratory No.: 2517-6 Page 1 Sample Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-30' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TOTkL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) Regulatory '' Criteria Method STLC TTLC Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L, Method mq/L. mg/kq Lead "4.5 mg/kg 4.0 SW-6010 5.0 1000. Comment: Ail constituents reported above'are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = STLC = TTLC = Practical Quantitation Limit'(refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor 41 (30 Atlas Or. · Bakersfield, CA 9330E) · (B05] 327~491 I · FAX (805J'327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES Date of 2217 "E" STREET Report: 03/27/92 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 i. Lab Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON ~'.'323-6460 Sampl~'Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-45' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO.1530 HRS.COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST.METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date .Sample. Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/19/92 Date Analysis Completed: 03/26/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level Benzene 5. mg/kg 5. Toluene 160. mg/k9 5. Ethyl Benzene 75. mg/kg 5. o-Xylene 140. mg/kg 5. m & p-Xylene 250. mg/k~ 5. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 3000. m9/k9 1000. Note: High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor ~)I::IATOF~IES Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-64g0 Date of Report: 03/31/92 Lab ~: 2517-12 Sample Description: PROJECT: ~601 EUREKA: 1-60' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soll Date Sample Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/19/92 Date Analysis Completed: 03/30/92 Analysis Reportin9 Results Units Minimum Reportin9 Level Benzene 110. mg/k9 20. Toluene 1300. mg/k9 20. Ethyl Benzene 300. mg/k9 20. o-Xylene 460. mg/k9 20: m & p-Xylene 2100. 'mg/k9 20. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 13000. mg/k9 5000. Note: High reported PQL due'to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON Sample Description: Date of Report: 03/30/92 Lab ~: 2517-15 323-6460 PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-75' (SOIL) 03-19~92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil Date Sample Collected: o3/19/92 Constituents Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/19/92 Analysis Results None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected Date Analysis Completed: 03/27/92 Reporting Units mg/kg mg/k~ mg/kg mg/kg Minimum Reporting Level 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 1. C~lifornia D.O.H.S. Cert. '#1186 Department Supervisor ~]ORA,TORIES WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON. 323-6460 Date Reported: 04/02/92 Date Received: 03/19/92 Laboratory No.: 2517-15 Page 1 Sample Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-75' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TOTAL CONTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) Constituents Sample Results Units Lead None Detected mg/k9 Regulatory Criteria Method STLC TTLC p~O.L. Method mq/L mq/kq 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000. Comment: P .Q.L. = 'N.D. = STLC = TTLC = Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration To~al Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor ,4 '1C'~ nr!~ I-~r.. R,~kers6eld. CA 93,°3/)8 · (EY3)5] 327.-4,c31 I · FAX (f~--q 327-191 E) BO~,TOFliES Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Date of Report: 03/31/92 Lab ~: 2517-16 Sample ,Description: TEST METHOD:, TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. · sample Matrix:, Soil PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-80' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON ~ Date Sample Collected: o3/19/92 Constituents Date Sample Received @ Lab: 03/19/92 Analysis Results Date Analysis Completed: 03/30/92 Reporting Units Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected mg/kg mg/kg 'mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 1. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor :~OP, ATORISS Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATEs 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Date of Report: 03/31/92 Lab ~: 2517-17 Sample Description: PROJECT: 601 EUREKA: 1-85' (SOIL) 03~19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil' Date Sample Collected: 03/19/92 Constituents Benzene Toluene ' Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/19/92 Date Analysis Completed: 03/30/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level None Detected mg/kg 0.005 0.047 mg/kg 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 0.005 None Detected mg/k9 0.005 0.014 mg/k9 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 1. I California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Date Reported: 04/02/92 Date Received: 03/19/92 Laboratory No.: 2517-17 Page 1 Sample Description: PROJECT:.601 EUREKA: 1-85' (SOIL) 03-19-92 FROM 0800 HRS TO 1530 HRS COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON 'TOTAL CONT~INANTS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) . ~ Regulatory ~ Criteria Method STLC TTLC Constituents Sample Results Units P~Q.L. ~ethod mq/L mq/kq Lead 4.5 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000. Comment: P.Q.L. = STLC = TTLC = Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals' (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total~levels. Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods", SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor ., ~ nn ^,-~o mr . R~-~r~6~ld ~ ~q.q~q"~ · i~8C~ 327~4~)1 I · FAX (EDS] 327-1918 ~OFIATOR~ES Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET ';' BAKERSFIELD, CA 93J01 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON '323-6460 Sample Description:. CALIF. SHEET METAL: 1 - 90' COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON Date of Report: 04/06/92 Lab ~: 2576-1 (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 TEST METHOD: Sample Matrix: Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 TPH by D.O.H~S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Date Analysis Completed: 04/05/92 Constituents Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) Analysis Results 0.084 0.16 0.049 0.026 0.062 None Detected Reportin9 units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Minimum Reporting Level, <0°005 "0.'005 0.005 0.005 0.005 · ,California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186 Department Supervisor 41 O0 Atlas Or. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (8(Db-) 327~4911 · FAX (80~ 5)27-1918 WILSON & 'ASSOCIATES'" 2217 "E" STREET '" BAKERSFIELD, CA' 93301'. '/' Attn.: JOHN,R. WILSON' ."<'.323-6460 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Date of Report:. 04/06/92 ." Lab #:. 2576-2 Sample Description: CALIF. SHEET METAL: 2 - 15' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 17010 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON : TEST METHOD: Sample Matrix: Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Constituents · Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum' Hydrocarbons (gas) TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Analysis Results 1000. 1500. 340. 480. '2000. 12000. Date Analysis Completed: 04/05/92 Reporting Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Minimum Reporting L'evel 1000. High reported PQL due to high concentration of target analytes. -.California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor 4100Atlas Or. · Bakersfield, (~A 933C)~ · (805) 327~1911 · FAX (B05)'327-191 E) LABOI:qATORIES, Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON &' ASSOCIATES ~" Date of 2217 "E" STREET ,.:".:i:'. '~ ,. Report: 04/06/92 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301... Lab ~: 2576-4 Attn.: JOHN 'R. WILSON . . 323-6460 Sample Description: CALIF. SHEET METAL: 2 30' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.o.H.s. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix:. Soil. ,. Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Date Analysis Completed: 04/05/92 Constituents Analysis Results Reporting Units Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 0.2 1.2 4.7 39. 10. 400. mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0.1. 0.1 '."; 0.1"" . 200. High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes. California D.O.H.S. Cert. %1186 Department Superv, isor .~.ii~iii,?.:?,,: ~ '?.~:~:': 4100Atlas Ct. · E)akersfield, C,A 933(~ · (BOb--) 327-491 I · FAX (80~ 327-1918 LA~ORATORII~S ' ~ WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET " BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301''. Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON'. 1323-6460 Date Reported: 04/03/92 Date Received: 03/23/92 Laboratory No.: 2576-4 Page: Sample Description: CA'IF ~ SHEET METAL: 2 30' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TOTAL coNTAMINANTS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) Method Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L. Method Lead 3.9 mg/kg 3.5 SW-6010 Regulatory Criteria STLC TTLC mq/L mq/kq 5.0 1000. Comment: P.Q.L. = STLC = TTLC = Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Total Threshold Limit Concentration REFERENCES: . . SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes physical/Chemical Methods",~ SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor ".,~,',.' ."i 4100 Atlas Or... Bakersfield, GA 9330~ · (BOb-) 327~491 I · FAX (BO5)~:327-1918 Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET ~ BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.': JOHN R. WILSON~ Sample Descrlption~ 323-6460 CALIF. SHEET METAL: 3 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH. by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Date of Report: 04/02/92 Lab #: 2576-6 25' (SOIL) 03-20'-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 Constituents Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons . (gas) Date Analysis Completed: 04/01/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level 400. mg/kg 100.: 3400. mg/kg 100.' 800. mg/kg 100. 1500. mg/kg 100." 2700. mg/kg 100. mg/kg 20000. 30000. High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor 4100Ar~as ~c. · ~)akersfiel~d. OA 9330~ · (BO5] 327~491 I · FAX(~ 327-1918 ~ORATOF~IES WmLsON ~i aSS0CIATEs.. "~' 2217 "E"" STREET ', BAKERSFIELD, CA, 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON Sample Description: Petroleum Hydrocarbons 323-6460 CALIF. SHEET METAL: Date of Report: 04/07/92 Lab %: 2576-7 30' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: .:Soll '" Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Analysis Results Date Analysis Completed: 04/06/92 Reporting Units Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xy!ene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected California D.O.H.S. Cert,. ~1186 Department Supervisor mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0.005 .0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 41 O0 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 9:3308 · (lEI(Db--) 327~4911 · FAX [805j 327-1918 LAIBORATOIRIES Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON ' 32'3-6460 Date of Report: 04/01/92 Lab #: 2576-8 Sample Description: CALIF.'SHEET METAL: 4 40' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil.' Date Sample Collected: 0312o/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Analysis Results Date Analysis Completed: 03/3~/92 Reporting Units Minimum. Reporting. Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0.005 0.005 0.005' 0.005 0.005 · California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor 4100At{as CC. · Elakersfield, CA 93308 · (805] 327-491 I · FAX (805) 327-1918 I_A~ORATORIE~S WILSON '& ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFI'ELD,' CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON Petroleum Hydrocarbons 323-6460 ,Date of Report: 04/07/9.2 Lab %: 2576-11 Sample Description: CALIF2 SHEET ~IETAL: 5 - 15' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON ~ TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H~S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil. Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Constituents Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) Date SamPle Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 AnalYsis Results 0.011 0.017 None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected Date Analysis Completed: 04/06/92 Reportin9 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Minimum Reporting Level · ,, 0.005 0:005 0.005 0.005 0.005 · ,'California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor 4100 Atlas Or. · Bakersfield, CA ~)3308 · [8C)5) 327~491 I · FAX (8C)5-J 327-1918 I_AIBOFIATOI=IIE~S , , . Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 'Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323-6460 Date of Report: 04/02/92 Lab ~: 2576-10 Sample Description: CALIF. SHEET METAL: 5 - 40' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY 'J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. sample Matrix: .Soil~ Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Constituents Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Date Analysis Completed: 04/01/92 Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) 42. mg/kg 540. mg/kg 160. mg/kg 300. mg/kg 510. mg/kg 7000. mg/kg 2000. High reported PQL due to high concentrations of target analytes in sample. .'California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor '4100Atlss Ct. Bakersfield, (DA 93308 · (I510b---) 327-491 I · FAX (E~ 327-1 ~)1B LABORATORIES WILSON &i ASSOCIATES ,' " 2217. "E". STREET BAKERSFIELD,, CA 93301":. Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON , Petroleum Hydrocarbons 323-6460 Date of Report: 04/02/92 Lab ~: 2576-12 Sample Description:'.' CALIF. SHEET METAL: 6 - 20' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Sample Matrix: Soil'' Date Sample Date Sample ' Collected: Received ® Lab: 03/20/92 03/23/92 Date Analysis Completed: 04/01/92 Constituents Analysis Results Reporting Units Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) .California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Department Supervisor None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 4100Atlas Or. · Bakeesfield, CA 93308 · (BO5) 327-4911 · FAX (B05~ ~)27-1 ~)18 I_ABOFIATOFqlES ' WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON' 323-6460 Date Reported: 04/03/92 Date Received: 03/23/92 Laboratory No.: 2576-12 Page Sample Description: CALIF. SHEET METAL: 6 20' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON Constituents TOTAL CONTD/HINANTS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) Method Sample Results ~nits P.Q.L~ ~ethod Lead 3.6 mg/kg 3.5 SW-6010 Regulatory Criteria STLC TTLC mq/L., mq/kq 5.0 1000. Comment: Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = Practical Quantitatlon Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. N.D. = None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). STLC = Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods"i~ SW 846, September, 1986. Department Supervisor 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (805) 327-4911 · FAX (805-j 327-1918 'Petroleum Hydrocarbons WILSON &',,ASSOCIATES ~:: ;~: ' 2217 "E" ·STREET .' "'" ~.ii~,'f{' , :' BAKERSFIELD, '.CA'j.,93301~?' :.~',"' ". ':: . Attn.: JOHN.R.i'WILSON~.'" ' 323-6460 . Sample Description ' CALIF. SHEET METAL: TEsT METHOD: · Sample Matrix: Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92, Date of Report: 04/07/92 Lab ~: 2576-13 6 30 ' (SOIL) 'COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TPH by D'.O'~H.S.' / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ~, ,,...Sdi. l.~.~.. ,.. , Date Sample Date Analysis Received ® Lab: Completed: 03/23/92 04/06/92 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 Constituents Minimum Analysis Reporting Reporting Results Units Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gas) None Detected mg/kg ..0.005 None Detected mg/kg ' 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 0.005 None Detected mg/kg 1. · JCalifornia D.O.H.S..Cert. ~1186 4100At~as Or. · Bakersfield. ~A 93308 · (805) 327-491 I · FAX (E~ 327-1 ~)18 ~, .'. '.. ~.~ ,, ,".. · '. WILSON & ASSOC~ATES:'i~:i::':':,i. 2217 "E" STREET, ':.i'~.,,'::,'~,~+..",· BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301-:. Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON~'i:~J 323-6460 Sample Description: Petroleum Hydrocarbons Date 'of Report: 04/02/92 Lab ~: 2576-14 CALIF. SHEET METAL: 6 - 40' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON , TEST METHOD: Sample Matrix: Date Sample Collected: 03/20/92 Constituents TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. 'Soil' Date Sample Received ® Lab: 03/23/92 Date Analysis Completed: 04/01/92 Analysis Reportin~ Results Units Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene o-Xylene m & p-Xylene Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (~as) None Detected m~/k~ 0.008 m~/k~ None Detected mg/kg None Detected m~/kg 0.010 mg/k~ None Detected m~/kg 0;'005 ..0~005 0.005' 0.005 0.005 California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Department Supervisor 4100 Atlas 0C.'. Bakersfield, OA 9330~) · (B(~-) 327-4911 · FA~ [805) 327-1918 LABORATORIE~ ' WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2217 "E" STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Attn.: JOHN R. WILSON 323'-6460 Date Reported: Date Received: 03/23/92 Laboratory No.: 2576-14 Page 1 Sample Description: Constituents CALIF..SHEET METAL: 6 - 40' (SOIL) 03-20-92 FROM 0800 TO 1700 COLLECTED BY J.R. WILSON TOTAL CONTAMINAI~TS (Title 22, Article 11, California Code of Regulations) Method Sample Results Units P.Q.L. ~ethod Regulatory Criteria STLC TTLC mq/L mq/kq Lead 8.5 mg/kg 3.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000. Comment: Ail constituents reported above are in mg/kg (unless otherwise stated) on an as received (wet) sample basis. Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate techniques to determine total levels. P.Q.L. = STLC = .Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration TTLC = Total Threshold Limit Concentration . REFERENCES: '...~:~ ' ~ . ': SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",' Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte detectable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed. None Detected (Constituent, if present, would be less than the method P.Q.L.). SW 846, September, 1986. 4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (E)CD-) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1 4100 Atlas Court LABORATORIES. IrlC. Bakersfield, California 93308'- CHAIN OF CUSTODY ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ Matrix (S) Soil (SL) Sludge ~ ~ (W) Water (Other) E c c ' c , <~_~ < -<~ < ~< .<~ r~ -<~ -<~<-~,~ Samples rec. cold (y/n) q , .~ Results Neededby: - ~ Date & Time ..~ W 4100 Atlas Court · L~BORATORIES. Inc. Bakersfield, California 93308''~ CHAIN OF CUSTODY ~ '' ~ ~ ~-' ~ 3 .. 0 -'~ O ~ m o ~ .. ¢.~ ~1 Matrix (S) Soil' (SL) Sludge (W) Ware,r ,(Other) E E E E c E -< Samples rec. cold (y/n) ~, ~ Custody Seals (y/n) ~ ~esults ~oeded by: u Date & lime ~ ~ ~ .. ~... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Number and 5' ~_. a._ ~ r~ ~ Container Type I 4100 Atlas Court IIl CHAIN OF CUSTODY '~ BORATORIES, Inc. Bakersfield, Calilornia 93308 [] ~ o. n ~=~ >z ~~~>z ~ " 'C ~ --'~~~ H ~' ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ Matrix (S) Soil (SI) Sludge ~ (W) Water (Other) 5. 5. 5- 5. O, 0 0 0 0 g ~ & Samples rec. cold (y/n) ~ Custody Seals (yin) ~~ Results Needed by: ~ ~ Date & Time Number and ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ ~' ,~ Container Type FiRE DEPARTMENT S. D, JOHNSON FiRE CHIEF CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" September 16, 1992 2101H STREET BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 John M. McCauley California Sheet Metal 4293 Country Club Drive Bakersfield, CA 93306 RE: Site characterization report for work conducted at the property located at 601 Eureka St. Bakersfield, CA. Dear Mr. McCauley,. To date, this office has not received the report for the work performed at the above stated address. Please be informed, that during a phone conversation with Ms. Barbara Anderson of the "UST" cleanup fund, regarding your case, I was informed that the FUND is ready to issue a letter of commitment to you, once you are in compliance. With that in mind, you must be notified that you will not.be in compliance until the report is submitted and reviewed by this office. Further, the time frame for the submittal of the ~report and your eligibility for fund money is not infinite. In short, you must submit the report by October 30, 1992 or you will be deemed out of compliance and permanently loose your eligibility for cleanup fund money.. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. CC: Ma.Barbara Anderson 2014 T Street SacramentO, CA 95814 Suite 130, claim #802. Sincerely, //Joe A. Dunwoody '~L~/ /~ ~nazardous Material Specialist / Underground Tank Program. Ralph E. Huey FIRE DEPARTMENT S. D. JOHNSON FIRE CHIEF CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" March 11, 1992 2101 h STREET BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 John Wilson Wilson & Associates 2217 E Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Site assessment work plan for the facility located at 601 Eureka St., Bakersfield, CA. Dear Mr. Wilson, This is to notify you that the workplan for the above stated address is satisfactory. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct over sight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerelv, . ?'~H;;ar~ous Material Specialist Underground Tank Program ICSON & CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING Work Plan For Site Contamination Preliminary Site Assessment California Sheet Metal 601 Eureka Street Bakersfield, Ca 93305, Presented To: John McCauley Presented By: WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. February 1992 2--92/CASHEET . RPT ~3270 istration Expires 12-31-93 2217 "E" STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 [BO5) 323~460 · FAX [805) 3294723 Page 2 February 1992 I.O INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 John McCauley has authorized WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. (W&A) to prepare this Site Contamination Workplan for Preliminary Site Assessment at the California Sheet Metal site located at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305. The Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division is the lead regulatory agency. PURPOSE The site assessment described in this Workplan has the following objectives: Further assess the lateral and vertical extent of on-site vadose zone contamination involving gasoline, and the gasoline constituents volatile aromatic, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX), in order to determine whether conditions exist which will require a full-scale investigation of the site. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of services described in the Workplan include: Locating underground utilities using California Sheet Metal as-built drawings (if available) as well as Under- ground Service Alert (U.S.A.); Advancing up to four soil borings in the vicinity of the underground storage tank cluster; The four borings will be advanced to a minimum depth of forty feet or ten feet of unimpacted soil, which ever occurs first; Steam cleaning of all drilling and sampling equipment prior to and between each boring to avoid cross- contamination; Collecting soil samples at depths to be evaluated in the field. Initially, samples will be collected at approximately five foot intervals beginning at five feet and continuing until total depth. The samples will be collected using a standard California split-spoon sampler equipped with brass tubes, steam cleaned prior to use. These samples will be field screened and selected samples will be chosen for chemical analysis; Page 3 February 1992 Field Screening will be accomplished using a photo- ionizing detector equipped with a 10.0er lamp. Soil samples will be placed in mason jars to approximately 50% capacity, shaken, and let stand for approximately 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at this time; Soil samples collected for chemical analysis will be collected in brass tubes and sealed with teflon liners, end caps and tape. The sealed tubes will be placed in a cooler with blue-ice and transported to a DHS certified laboratory under chain-of-custody procedures; Analysis of selected soil samples for fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline and gasoline constituent volatile aromatics using DOHS Luft Method (purge and trap for gasoline) and EPA Method 8020, respectively; * Prepare field boring logs; Prepare a written preliminary investigation and evaluation report summarizing the results of the investigation with conclusions and recommendations. The report will be reviewed by a California Registered Geologist or Civil Engineer. 1.3 SCHEDULE W&A anticipates beginning work described herein within one week upon approval from the City and authorization to proceed from John McCauley. The soil borings can be drilled and sampled in approximately two working days. The analytical data will be reported within four weeks and the report will be completed within two weeks after receipt of the analytical results. 2.0 BACKGROUND The California Sheet Metal facility is located at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, California as shown on Exhibit 1. 2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION The facility as shown is not to scale, see Exhibit 2. The facility was used for fueling equipment. Previously located at the site was one 550 gallon gasoline underground storage tank and dispenser. Page 4 February 1992 2.2 PROJECT HISTORY On or about December 17, 1991, an underground fuel tank (gasoline) was removed from the above referenced property location. Soil samples were collected from beneath the dispenser area. These samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and volatile aromatic (BTXE). Gasoline and diesel were detected beneath the tank (Exhibit 3). The analytical results indicated concentration in excess of state and county guidelines. John McCauley contracted W&A to prepare this Workplan and implement a Site Characterization Study. 3.0 WORKPLAN W&A proposes to assess and define the lateral and vertical extent of the contamination of the soil. 3.1 SOIL BORING DEPTHS AND LOCATIONS Four soil borings will be drilled to a depth of approximately forty feet. Soil samples will be collected at five foot intervals beginning at five feet and continuing until ten feet of unimpacted soil is encountered. The proposed locations are shown on Exhibit 3. The locations have been chosen to provide lateral and vertical definition in the vadose zone. S-1 will be advanced through the center of the former gasoline tank where the highest concentration were detected to assess the vertical limits. S-2, S-3 and S-4 will be placed to assess the lateral extent of elevated concentrations for the potential gasoline source. 4.0 METHODS The following sections will describe in detail the methods to be employed in implementing this Workplan. 4.1 BORING METHODS The borings will be advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 rig, or equivalent, with a six inch or larger hollow stem continuous flight auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 1452-80 for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. The augers will be steam cleaned prior to drilling each boring. The lithology and other pertinent data will be recorded on a field boring log in accordance with ASTM Method D 2488-84 for visual description and identification of soils. Page 5 February 1992 Cuttings and other spoil from the borings will be placed in appropriate D.O.T. approved 55-gallon drums until verified, with analytical results, whether or not the soil is contaminated. If the material is contaminated, a written plan will be submitted by the facility operator to the City for their approval before treatment and/or disposal occurs. Disposal will be the responsibility of the Facility Operator and should occur within 90 days of completion of drilling. Back filling of any soil boring or part thereof, will occur by pouring a bentonite cement mixture into the boring. 4.2 SOIL SAMPLING Soil samples will be collected through the auger in 2-inch brass sleeves driven in a split-spoon sampler by a 140 pound hammer with a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D1586-84 for split barrel sampling of soil and D1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler will be steam cleaned prior to each use. Soil samples will be driven at depths of five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty-five, thirty, thirty-five and forty feet in each boring depending on total depth. The blow counts, recovery, and lithology will be recorded on the field logs. Lithology will be described in accordance with ASTM procedure D2488-84 (Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils). One brass sleeve with soil from each interval will be capped, sealed, labeled in accordance with EPA protocols, recorae~ on a chain of custody form, placed in a cooler at- four degrees centigrade or less, and transported to a California Certified Laboratory with the chain of custody for the specified analysis. 4.3 SOIL ANALYSIS The soil samples will be analyzed by National Toxicology Laboratories, a California State Certified Laboratory, in accordance with State guidelines and EPA protocols. The samples will be analyzed for fuel hydrocarbons, as gasoline, and the gasoline constituents volatile aromatics using the DOHS Luft Method (purge and trap for gasoline) and EPA Method 8020, respectively. 4.4 FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES Soil samples will be collected using three six-inch brass tubes installed inside a split-spoon sampler. The middle sample tube will be immediately capped and stored in an iced cooler upon collection. The bottom tube will be used for lithologic description, and the top tube will be used for Page 6 February 1992 field screening. The material from the top tube will be placed in mason jars to approximately 50 percent capacity, shaken, and stored for a period of 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at this time and noted on the boring log. 5.0 5.1 5.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN This section describes field and analytical quality-assurance procedures to be followed during the investigation. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND HANDLING PROTOCOL Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure quality of data obtained from a sample. Each sample therefore, will be collected in a brass tube, preserved correctly for the intended analysis and stored for no longer than the permissible holding time prior to analysis. Protocol to be applied in this project is described in section 4. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROTOCOL Sample identification and Chain of Custody procedures are designed to assure sample quality and to document sample possession from the time it is collected to the time of its ultimate disposal. The container for each sample submitted for analysis will have a label affixed with the identifying number or the number will be inscribed directly on the container if feasible. The analytical laboratory will assign a separate sample number to that sample for internal sample coordination and identification. A description of the sample including the sample number and other pertinent information regarding its collection and/or significance will be written in field notes and/or a boring log being prepared by the site engineer. These field documents will be kept in a permanent project file. All samples will be analyzed by a State certified laboratory for the analysis requested. A properly completed Chain of Custody Form will be submitted to the analytical laboratory along with the samples. The laboratory assigned number will be properly entered on the form. A quality control officer at the lab will verify integrity of the samples submitted, proper sample volume correctness of containers issued, and properly executed Chain of Custody Form. Pertinent information will be entered into a log book kept by the laboratory. Page 7 February 1992 5.3 ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE In addition to routine calibration of analytical instruments with standards and blanks, the analyst is required to run duplicates and spikes on ten percent of analysis to assure an added measure of reliability and precision. Accuracy is verified through the following: 1. U.S. EPA and State certification of results; 2. Participation in inter-laboratory round robin program; "Blind" samples are submitted for analysis by the quality control office on a weekly basis. These are prepared from the National Bureau of Standards specification of EPA reference standards; 4. Verification of results with an alternative method. 6.0 SITE SAFETY PLAN Appendix A contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with Worker Right to Know Regulations and CAC Title 26. APPENDIX A SITE SAFETY PLAN INTRODUCTION A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil assessment/remediation. Its purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal protective equipment standards, decontamination procedures, and emergency action plans. W&A, seeks to enter property described above for the purpose of conducting a site assessment consisting of up to four borings to evaluate the extent of soil impaction. Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals during exploratory drilling using a California modified split-spoon sampler through a hollow-stem auger. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to Page 8 February 1992 be chemically analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape, and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All Chain of Custody protocol will be followed. Drilling equipment will be brought to the site and operated by a subcontractor: Soils Engineering, Inc. 4700 District Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93309 C-57 License #253192 The SSP described means for protecting all on-site personnel from deleterious contamination or personal injury while conducting on-site activities, as described below, will meet all requirements promulgated by the California Department of Health Services. SITE BACKGROU~D; This property is a fueling facility located on Eureka Street, Bakersfield, California. The facility contained one 550 gallon gasoline tank, and associated dispensers. RESPONSIBILITY OF KEY PERSONNEL; Ail personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr. John R. Wilson of W&A, will serve as Project Manager and On-Site Engineer. He will also serve as Site Safety Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Wilson will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all times by the SSO. The SSO will appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, and will conduct a training session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site and will utilize the Material Safety Data Sheets for information on compounds to be encountered. Mr. John Wilson will also be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting and securing samples, and assuring sample integrity by adherence to Chain of Custody protocol. On-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforseen hazards. After documenting understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation Page 9 February 1992 observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are qualified for. Provisions in this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. A drilling contractor has been employed to deliver and operate all drilling equipment. Qualified personnel only will have any contact with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the drilling contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to drilling equipment. Latex gloves will be worn by persons collecting or handling samples to prevent exposure to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples, and used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contamination. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using PID. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5 ppm, in the breathing space. Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame, or sparks will be permitted in order to prevent accidental ignition. RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly flammable. Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL's), and Toxicity Levels (LD50, oral-rat), all in mg/kg (ppm), are listed below: Compound TVL STEL Toxicity Gasoline 200 300 ...... Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 4300 Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. Page 10 February 1992 R~DOSUREMONITORING PLAN: A Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind locations if PID readings indicate high levels of volatile organics in the breathing space. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed. When handling samples, the on-site personnel will wear latex gloves. Hard hats will be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of drilling equipment. WORK ZONES AND SECURITY MEASURES: Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placecards, or wide yellow tape, surrounding the site will define the perimeter. The Project Manager will be responsible for site security. DECONTAMINATION MEASURES: Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possibly contaminated soil. Ail personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck and face with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site. Respirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Drilling and sampling equipment used will be decontaminated by steam-cleaning. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample is taken and drilling equipment will be decontaminated before each boring is commenced. GENERAL SAFE WORK PRACTICES: Drillers and other on-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meeting as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit. Page 11 February 1992 Drilling and sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings. The On-Site Engineer will oversee operations and log boring in consultation with drillers. The Sample Coordinator will assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms, contaminant properties, warning signs, health hazard data, risk from exposure, and emergency first aid. All chemicals to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: According to CFR 29, 1910.120, paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators 30 days or more during one year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. RECORD KEEPING: Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms, and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training meeting. Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet requirements. Included will be names and social security number of employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons, and personal air monitoring record. Page 12 February 1992 CONTINGENCY PLANS: In the event of accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior Project Manager, or other person will notify appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: Bakersfield city Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance emergency - 911 3. Nearest Emergency Hospital: Memorial Hospital 420 34th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 327-1792 /lgr 2-92/CASHEET.RPT CEN J'ER" SHAFTER AIRPORT '%/ VILLAGE " Kn.h Ilill / II1~' /: Imperial FL]I,E EI.K RESER~,'E '~. --~-'"' BUENA ACRES I 1 I ~UI'.'N..I I'LYT,.I L..IKE liE~) '~/ KERN RIVER GOLF COURSE EDISON GREENFIELD OiGio~qio WEEDPATCH T'. EXHIBIT I IIOH E ':3AV N OIt,lll '"' EXHIBIT I KERN ~ '~1 12' TANK LOCATION BORING LOCATION EXHIBIT 2 BAKERFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION UNDERGROUND STROAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE Site Infromation Slte Address 601 EUREKA Zlp Code 93305 APN FaciltltyNameCALIFORNIA SHEET ~iETAL Cross StreetKERN Tank Owner/Operator JOHN MCCAULEY Phone 871-1251 Mailing Address 601 EUREKA. RECEIVED DEU. ! .t 1991 TANK A,s'd ............ Ctt~AKERSFIEL~IpCode 93305 Contractor Information Company CALPI, INC. Address P O BOX 6278 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Phone 5~39-5648 Llcense~'A"506025 Ci y~A,.,ERSFIEIJ~tp Code93386 Workmans Comp ~1011809 Prellmanary Assement Information Company. CALPI, INC. Phone 509-5648 Llcense~ "A"506025 Address P O BOX 6278 City_p~d(ERSFiEL~ip Code 93386 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Workmans Comp ~1011809. Tank Cleaninq Information Company CALPI, INC. Address P O BOX 6278 CItyB~;ERSFIELLZIp WateTransporterIdentificationNumber .207294 Name Of Rtnsate Disposal l.'acility. GIBSON REFINING Address END OF COMMERCIAL DR. City3AKE~SFIELD Zip Facility Identification Number C~d] 900 083 177 Tank Transporter Information Phone Company CALPI, .INC.. Address P O BOX 6278 .. CityB;~%ERSFIELEZip Tank Destination GOLDEN STATE Phone 589-5648 Code93386 Code 9330R 58~9L5648 Code 93~06 ! h,:' TANK INFORMATION Tank ~ ... age..,.Volume Chemical Dates. Stored . '.. . . ' ,,, :'~ 115. I '.:T,'"I'I: {' :..:!,'F: Stored 1 UNKNOWN 5 50 C~S . ",' ,'.Ch'e'mical tp~v~%usly Stored iFor Official Use Only Application Date~l~/~'/ Facility # ,'~1¢/0~ ' of Tanks / The applicant has ~ecleved, understands, and will comply with the attached conditions of this permit and any other State, Local and Federal regulations. ~ : This fozm has been completed under penalty of perjury, and to the .best of ~ kn~lodge, ia true and correct. __/~6~6 ~e~ B~ ~pplicant Na~ (print) Applicant THIS ~PPLICATION EXHIBIT 3 GOLDEN STA~METALS, INC. P. O. Box 70158 · 2000 E. Brundage Lane Bakersfield, Calilornia (.)3387 Phone (805} 327-3559 · Fax (805) 327-5749 Scrap Metals, Processing & Recycling T/~K DISPOSAL FORM /(.:':c // Contraclor's License No. JOB SITE' '~, ' ~ ' BESTINA~ON: G.S.M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGE LANE · TANK INSPECTION [~CLEAN & DRY (ACCEPT), OR [] RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT) ~ LEL READING __ OXYGEN CONTEl'iT DISPOSAL FEE __SCRAP VALUE OTHER Conlractor's/---t:C BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387 QTY GALLONS SERIAL NO. NE]' TONS ' 250 .14 iiii!iiiili!i!ilili!iiiiii!:~.i!!:!:'~i!!!i.!.i.!.i.i.i.! i.!::i ~ :: :: ~ :::~i:: ::~??!::::i.!.?:i i.??:?:(!~'~.?:.i.i.!, ~..::~! 1000 - 6 l! .61 !i:~iii~::!;,;iiii?i;ii!iiiiiiii!i;i~ ~; i.i.i.!.i.;.:?..i.!.i.;.i.l.i.i.~..i.ii.?: i~!~ ii;ii:::: ~i~i;ii.i?..!.i.::...!. :.!.i.i~i~ .......... i 2000 .97 3000 !.32 TOTAL 5000 2.42 !::iii~::ii':i!::i:;::::iiii:~:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iii:: !' .;.:...' '.'.' '.'.'.'.'.'.'.',', ,'1 ~ ..... *. .......... ;..... :..;::: :.:::::: ;:::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ..... ::;:::::::::: :::..:.:: :.; :;::::¥..::. 7500 3.28 ............ ,., ...,........ ..................... . ; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gO00 3.82 ............ , ............. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .......... ====================== ::..t;:.:::. :: ' ' '::: · 120O0 4.93 ·: :':';~ '"'"' ' ....... ;::: :::;: :: ;:: :: ;: ............... :':':':' '":";':::: :? :':': ":':':': ::'::': :':: ':' :" ':' ':: :::: '~:! i:i:i:!:!::ii:[:![ TOTAL AIl fees Incurred are per load Llnless specJ[led. Terms are ~ii~ ii i~ili !!i!ii! i net 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature represenls acceplance of terms for payment, and confirms .' ~ - / "~ CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION . THIS I~ T¢ ~TIFY THE RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE.OF'.THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIED WILL BE COMPLETELY DATE WtIITE-- Conlraclm Copy · YELLOW -- File Copy · PINK -- Perme,mnl Copy DO NOT WRIIE BELOW lttlS UNE. ~ (12190) V/HIe: ISOF SENDS 11 tls COPY IO DI-IS WIll lin 30 DAYS. 81o0-22 To: P.O. Box 30C]0, S,ac~omenlo, CA 95812 SMC Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Client Name: CALPI inc. Address : PO Box 6278 Bakersfield, Calif. 93386 Attention : Mr. J.P. Mulhoffer Date samples received : 12-17-91 Date analysis completed: 12-23-91 Date of report : 12-24-91 Project Name: N/A Project ~ : 4644 P.O. ~ : 03-3595-91 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4530 ID: ~1 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene p-Xylene m,o-Xylene Isopropylbenzene ug/g MDL,ug/g 44 0.0050 170 0.0050 19 0.0050 47 0.0050 53 0.0050 7.6 0.0050 TPH (Gasoline) 810 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 5030/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected I. Robert~J. Michels Ana-lyticml Chemist 3155 Pegasus Drive P.O. Box 80835 · · Bakersfield. CA 93308 Bakersfield. CA 93380 · ·(805) 393-3597 FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4531 ID: ~2 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene p-Xylene m,o-Xylene Isopropylbenzene TPH (Gasoline) ug/g 98 275 23 58 66 5.8 1000 MDL,Ug/g 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 1.0 J '. Robert Michels Analytical Chemist RECEIVER ....~,"7" 2 7 'D.fll CIVIL ENGINEERING . SURVEYING Work Plan For Site Characterization California Sheet Metal 601 Eureka Street Bakersfield, Ca 93305 Presented To: John McCanley Presented By: 2--92/CAS]{EET . RPT 2217 ,,E., STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 (8D-~j 323~460 · FAX (805) 3234723 Page 2 February 1992 I.O INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 California Sheet Metal has authorized WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. (W&A) to prepare this Workplan for site characterization at the California Sheet Metal site located at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305. The Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division is the lead regulatory agency. PURPOSE The site characterization described in this Workplan has the following objectives: Further assess the lateral and vertical extent of on-site vadose zone contamination involving gasoline, and the gasoline constituents volatile aromatic, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX); SCOPE OF WORK The scope of services described in the Workplan include: Locating underground utilities using California Sheet Metal as-built drawings (if available) as well as Under- ground Service Alert (U.S.A.); Advancing up to four soil borings in the vicinity of the underground storage tank cluster; The four borings will be advanced to a minimum depth of forty feet or ten feet of unimpacted soil, which ever occurs first; Steam cleaning of all drilling and sampling equipment prior to and between each boring to avoid cross- contamination; Collecting soil samples at depths to be evaluated in the field. Initially, samples will be collected at approximately five foot intervals beginning at five feet and continuing until total depth. The samples will be collected using a standard California split-spoon sampler equipped with brass tubes, steam cleaned prior to use. These samples will be field screened and selected samples will be chosen for chemical analysis; Page 3 February 1992 Field Screening will be accomplished using a photo- ionizing detector equipped with a 10.0eV lamp. Soil samples will be placed in mason jars to approximately 50% capacity, shaken, and let stand for approximately 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at this time; Soil samples collected for chemical analysis will be collected in brass tubes and sealed with teflon liners, end caps and tape. The sealed tubes will be placed in a cooler with blue-ice and transported to a DHS certified laboratory under chain-of-custody procedures; Analysis of selected soil samples for fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline and gasoline constituent volatile aromatics using DOHS Luft Method (purge and trap for gasoline) and EPA Method 8020, respectively; * Prepare field boring logs; Prepare a written report summarizing the results of the investigation with conclusions and recommendations. The report will be reviewed by a California Registered Geologist or Civil Engineer. 1.3 SCHEDULE W&A anticipates beginning work described herein within one week upon approval from the County and authorization to proceed from California Sheet Metal. The soil borings can be drilled and sampled in approximately two working days. The analytical data will be reported within four weeks and the report will be completed within two weeks after receipt of the analytical results. 2.0 BACKGROUND California Sheet Metal is located at 601 Eureka Street, Bakersfield, California as shown on Exhibit 1. 2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION The facility as shown is not to scale, see Exhibit 2. The facility was used for fueling equipment. Previously located at the site was one 550 gallon gasoline underground storage tank dispenser. Page 4 February 1992 2.2 PROJECT HISTORY On or about December 17, 1991, an underground fuel t~nk (gasoline) was removed from the above referenced property location. Soil samples were collected from beneath the dispenser area. These samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and volatile aromatic (BTXE). Gasoline and diesel were detected beneath the tank (Exhibit 3). The analytical results indicated concentration in excess of state and county guidelines. California Sheet Metal contracted W&A to prepare this Workplan and implement a Site Characterization Study. 3.0 WORKPLAN W&A proposes to assess and define the lateral and vertical extent of the contamination of the soil. 3.1 SOIL BORING DEPTHS AND LOCATIONS Four soil borings will be drilled to a depth of approximately forty feet. Soil samples will be collected at five foot intervals beginning at five feet and continuing until ten feet of unimpacted soil is encountered. The proposed locations are shown on Exhibit 3. The locations have been chosen to provide lateral and vertical definition in the vadose zone. S-1 will be advanced through the center of the former gasoline tank where the highest concentration were detected to assess the vertical limits. S-2, S-3 and S-4 will be placed to assess the lateral extent of elevated concentrations for the potential gasoline source. 4.0 METHODS The following sections will describe in detail the methods to be employed in implementing this Workplan. 4.1 BoRING METHODS The borings will be advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 rig, or equivalent, with a six inch or larger hollow stem continuous flight auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 1452-80 for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. The augers will be steam cleaned prior to drilling each boring. The lithology and other pertinent data will be recorded on a field boring log in accordance with ASTM Method D 2488-84 for visual description and identification of soils. Page 5 February 1992 Cuttings and other spoil from the borings will be placed in appropriate D.O.T. approved 55-gallon drums until verified, with analytical results, whether or not the soil is contaminated. If the material is contaminated, a written plan will be submitted by the facility operator to the County for their approval before treatment and/or disposal occurs. Disposal will be the responsibility of the Facility Operator and should occur within 90 days of completion of drilling. Back filling of any soil boring or part thereof, will occur by pouring a bentonite cement through the auger. 4.2 SOIL SAMPLING Soil samples will be collected through the auger in 2-inch brass sleeves driven in a split-spoon sampler by a 140 pound hammer with a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D1586-84 for split barrel sampling of soil and D1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler will be steam cleaned prior to each use. Soil samples will be driven at depths of five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty-five, thirty, thirty-five and forty feet in each boring depending on total depth. The blow counts, recovery, and lithology will be recorded on the field logs. Lithology will be described in accordance with ASTM procedure D2488-84 (Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils). One brass sleeve with soil from each interval will be capped, sealed, labeled in accordance with EPA protocols, recorded on a chain of custody form, placed in a cooler at four degrees centigrade or less, and transported to a California Certified Laboratory with the chain of custody for the specified analysis. 4.3 SOIL ANALYSIS The soil samples will be analyzed by National Toxicology Laboratories, a California State Certified Laboratory, in accordance with State guidelines and EPA protocols. The samples will be analyzed for fuel hydrocarbons, as gasoline, and the gasoline constituents volatile aromatics using the DOHS Luft Method (purge and trap for gasoline) and EPA Method 8020, respectively. 4.4 FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES, Soil samples will be collected using three six-inch brass tubes installed inside a split-spoon sampler. The middle sample tube will be immediately capped and stored in an iced cooler upon collection. The bottom tube will be used for lithologic description, and the top tube will be used for Page 6 February 1992 field screening. The material from the top tube will be placed in mason jars to approximately 50 percent capacity, shaken, and stored for a period of 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at this time and noted on the boring log. 5.0 5.1 5.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN This section describes field and analytical quality-assurance procedures to be followed during the investigation. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND F~NDLING PROTOCOL Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure quality of data obtained from a sample. Each sample therefore, will be collected in a brass tube, preserved correctly for the intended analysis and stored for no longer than the permissible holding time prior to analysis. Protocol to be applied in this project is described in section 4. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONAND CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROTOCOL Sample identification and Chain of Custody procedures are designed to assure sample quality and to document sample possession from the time it is collected to the time of its ultimate disposal. The container for each sample submitted for analysis will have a label affixed with the identifying number or the number will be inscribed directly on the container if feasible. The analytical laboratory will assign a separate sample number to that sample for internal sample coordination and identification. A description of the sample including the sample number and other pertinent information regarding its collection and/or geologic significance will be written in field notes and/or a geologic boring log being prepared by the site geologist. These field documents will be kept in a permanent project file. All samples will be analyzed by a State certified laboratory for the analysis requested. A properly completed Chain of Custody Form will be submitted to the analytical laboratory along with the samples. The laboratory assigned number will be properly entered on the form. A quality control officer at the lab will verify integrity of the samples submitted, proper sample volume correctness of containers issued, and properly executed Chain of Custody Form. Pertinent information will be entered into a log book kept by the laboratory. Page 7 February 1992 5.3 ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE In addition to routine calibration of analytical instruments with standards and blanks, the analyst is required to run duplicates and spikes on ten percent of analysis to assure an added measure of reliability and precision. Accuracy is verified through the following: 1. U.S. EPA and State certification of results; Participation in inter-laboratory round robin program; "Blind" samples are submitted for analysis by the quality control office on a weekly basis. These are prepared from the National Bureau of Standards specification of EPA reference standards; 4. Verification of results with an alternative method. 6.0 SITE SAFETY PLAN Appendix A contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with Worker Right to Know Regulations and CAC Title 26. APPENDIX A SITE SAFETY PLAN INTRODUCTION A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety provisions needed during the site soil assessment/remediation. Its purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered at the site. The SSP establishes personnel · responsibilities, personal protective equipment standards, decontamination procedures, and emergency action plans. W&A, seeks to enter property described above for the purpose of conducting a site assessment consisting of up to four borings to evaluate the extent of soil impaction. Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals during exploratory drilling using a California modified split-spoon sampler through a hollow-stem auger. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to Page 8 February 1992 be chemically analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape, and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All Chainof Custody protocol will be followed. Drilling equipment will be brought to the site and operated by a subcontractor: Soils Engineering, Inc. 4700 District Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93309 C-57 License #253192 The SSP described means for protecting all on-site personnel from deleterious contamination or personal injury while conducting on-site activities, as described below, will meet all requirements promulgated by the California Department of Health Services. SITE BACKGROUND; This property is a fueling facility located on Eureka Street, Bakersfield, California. The facility contained one 550 gallon gasoline tank, and associated dispensers. RESPONSIBILITY OF KEY PERSONNEL; Ail personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr. John R. Wilson of W&A, will serve as Project Manager and On-Site Engineer. He will also serve as Site Safety Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Wilson will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of the SSP. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all times by the SSO. The SSO will appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, and will conduct a training session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be made aware of hazards at the site and will utilize the Material Safety Data Sheets for information on compounds to be encountered. Mr. John Wilson will also be responsible for keeping field notes, collecting and securing samples, and assuring sample integrity by adherence to Chain of Custody protocol. On-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid unforseen hazards. After documenting understanding of the SSP, each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation Page 9 February 1992 observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tasks for which they believe they are qualified for. Provisions in this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly encountered when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. A drilling contractor has been employed to deliver and operate all drilling equipment. Qualified personnel only will have any contact with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the drilling contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to drilling equipment. Latex gloves will be worn by persons collecting or handling samples to prevent exposure to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples, and used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contamination. Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using PID. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5 ppm, in the breathing space. Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame, or sparks will be permitted in order to prevent accidental ignition. RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly flammable. Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short Term Exposure Limits (STEL's), and Toxicity Levels (LD50, oral-rat), all in mg/kg (ppm), are listed below: Compound TVL STEL Toxicity Gasoline 200 300 Benzene 10 25 4894 Toluene 100 150 5000 Xylene 100 150 4300 Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. Page 10 February 1992 EXPOSURE MONITORING PLAN: A Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) will be used to monitor vapor concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind locations if PID readings indicate high levels of volatile organics in the breathing space. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed. When handling samples, the on-site geologist will wear latex gloves. Hard hats will be worn by all personnel on-site when in proximity of drilling equipment. WORK ZONES AND SECURITY NRASURES: Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placecards, or wide yellow tape, surrounding the site will define the perimeter. The Project Manager will be responsible for site security. DECONTAMINATION MEASURES: Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possibly contaminated soil. Ail personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck and face with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site. Respirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Drilling and sampling equipment used will be decontaminated by steam-cleaning. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample is taken and drilling equipment will be decontaminated before each boring is commenced. GENERAL SAFE WORK PRACTICES: Drillers and other on-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meeting as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit. Page 11 February 1992 Drilling and sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings. The On-Site Engineer will oversee operations and log boring in consultation with drillers. The Sample Coordinator will assure that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and handling samples. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms, contaminant properties, warning signs, health hazard data, risk from exposure, and emergency first aid. All chemicals to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: According to CFR 29, 1910.120, paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators 30 days or more during one year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. All site personnel will be required to have had a complete chemical physical within the past year. RECORD KEEPING: Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms, and all emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training meeting. Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet requirements. Included will be names and social security number of employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons, and personal air monitoring record. Page 12 February 1992 CONTINGENCY PLANS: In the event of accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior Project Manager, or other person will notify appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance emergency - 911 3. Nearest Emergency Hospital: Memorial Hospital 420 34th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 327-1792 /lgr 2-92/CASHEET.RPT urbank ~ , Shark 'r..,d~ {ti{I ~ ~_ Road 7th ~REC, AREA '~ ~-~ ~O h~a Grade .~ - / ~ ~ KERN RIVER ~ Siddi~ -. ~-.% STATE .// ~ RESERVE {~ MONICIPAL .. ~"' / Pensmge,- Rd~ j Bakersfield GREENFIELD ] // OLD RIVER I H U I': % ..~ = R d. A~I~.~ Il(' S { SHL ~ - WEEDPAICH 'r{Tulammu indian Site /" ~ SHL 374 x*~;.~ Bear Mtn. Rd. Mountain Pieri Rd. ) ~9 E BUENA FI.?~.{ LAKE BED ~ ~ ~ ~iilips Rd.~ ~ · ~{~'--'~'~ '~ '~11 ';") ~'" .. . ~ [ :' '~ [ .,}~L~- Jif t~ili ~ }~[ ~ ~:'-- ~ ~/'~'/ ':.~ 2~' ' ~] ' -'~ .~ :. l , ~ > Ave.{~N ~,~ Famgao Granite go~~ ~ P~ ' ~ ced '.>'~ X, ~ I :ed Avenue ~7' ~INTER~ I ~ .~ { ~' Pyramid H,ll EXHIBIT 1 uo u!S O0 '3AY NOIN[I · EXHIBIT 1' KERN ~S..3 TANK LOCATION BORING LOCATION EXHIBIT 2 BAKERFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION UNDERGROUND STROAGE TANK PROGRAM PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE Site Infromation Site Address 601 EUREKA ZtpCode 93305 APN FacililtyNameCALIFORNIA SHEET HETAL CrossStreetKERN Tank Owner/Operator JOHN MCCAULEY Phone 871-1251 Mailing Address 601 EUREKA N/A RE£EIVE1] D E g. 1 1991 TANK ............ CityBAKERSFIEL~tpCode 93305 Contractor Information Company CALPI, INC. Address P O BOX 6278 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Phone 589-5648 Llcense~'A" 50602 5 CIty~AKERSFIELZip Code 93386 Workmans Comp ~1011809 Preltmanary Assement Information Company CALPI, INC. Phone 5,99-5648 Llcense~"A".506025 Address P 0 BOX 6278 CityB~/fERSFiEL~ip Code 933R6 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Workmans Comp #1011809 Tank Cleaninq Information Company CALPI, INC. Address P O BOX 6278 WateTransporterIdentificationNumber 207294 Name Of Rlnsate Disposal Facility GIBSON REFINING Address END OF COMMERCIAL DR. Cit~BAKERSFIEI.D Zip Code Facility Identification Number CAD 9,90 883 177 Tank Transporter Information Company CALPI, INC. Phone 58~9'5648 Address P 0 BOX 6278 ., CityBAKERSFIELfZip Code Tank Destination GOLDEN STATE Phone 589-5648 C 1 ty BA~<ERSFIEL~ tp Code93386 93308 93986 Tank 1 ~ ~,!,:- TANK INFORMATION age, ,~ Volume Chemical Dates~ Stored '.:'F,".'!7: !"/.!,'.'. Stored UNKNC~/~ 5 5 0 C~S U~,.P~7OWN ', ~'. C'h'e'mica1 ~P. rev:i'0us ly Stored For official Uae Only Application Date~}/?/ Facility # ~/dfd~ # of Tanks / Fees The applicant has recieved, understands, and will comply with the attached conditions of this permit and any other State, Local and Federal regulations. This form has been completed under penalty of perjury, and to the .beat of ~ knowledge, ia true and correct. __/'.~'r0~Y~./ ~pplicant Na~{~(print) Applicant sif~nature // THIS APPLICATION EXHIBIT 3 GOLDEN STATE METALS, INC, P. O. Box 70158 · 2000 E. Brundage Lane Bakersfield, California 93387 Phone (805) 327-3559 · Fax (805) 327-5749 Scrap Metals, Processing & Recycling N° 10177 TA~K: DISPOSAL FORM Contractor's License No. Contr actor's/--- ~,/(~ p one.o. DESTINA~ON: G.S.M. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGELANE · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387 L"// TANK INSPECTION ~::/CLEAN & DRY (ACCEPT), OR, [] RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT) /~ LEL READING OXYGEN CONTE,T DISPOSAL FEE SCRAP VALUE OTHER LICENSE NO: 550 1000 - 6 ft 2000 3000 5000 7500 9000 12000 .24 .97 1.32 2.42 3.28 3.82 4.93 TOTAL TOTAL All fees Incurred are per load unless specified. Terms are net 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature represents acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms that tank removal complies with State laws. CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE ':.:i ~-\ .--- -. ~" "~ CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION THI~ IS~ T¢ CE~T1FY THE ~EC~,!PT AND ACCEPTANCE_OF .THE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIED WILL BE COMPLETELY , DE~O~ED FOR~R~CLING PURPOSES ~NLY. . .... ~ ~ ~ A~THORIZEO REP. DATE WHITE-- Conlractor Copy · YELLOW -- ~le Copy · PINK ~ Perma~nt Copy See lnstrucllc~$ on boc$ )f page 6. ~o~c s~,~o,~,,, co,~,omo~-.. T ~. S~ :.: :..: .... :.....:.. ~. ~me :::'.'....::..,::.::... ~P~/~. :::.: . ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ':." ::':": ::: :.' ============================================ R [P~l~fly~ ~e S~e ~onm ~ c l DO NOT WRIIE BELOW IHIS UNE. DHS 8022A (12/~1~3) W1~te: TSDF S~NDS I~IIS COPY 1'O Dt4S WITHIN 30 DAYS. EPA 8700--22 To: P.O. Box 30CK], S~ctamenfo, CA 95812 SMC Laboratory Analytical Ctaemistry Client Name: CALPI Inc. Address : PO Box 6278 Bakersfield, Calif. 93386 Attention : Mr. J.P. Mulhoffer Date samples received : 12-17-91 Date analysis completed: 12-23-91 Date of report : 12-24-91 Project Name: N/A Project ~ : 4644 P.O. ~ : 03-3595-91 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4530 ID: ~1 ug/g Benzene 44~ Toluene 170 Ethylbenzene 19 p-Xylene 47 m,o-Xylene 53 Isopropylbenzene 7.6 TPH (Gasoline) MDL,ug/g 0.O05O 0.0050 O.O05O 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 810 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 5030/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected Robert J. Michels Analytical Chemist 3155 Pegasus Drive · Bakersfield. CA 93308 ·(805) 393-3597 P.O. Box 80835 · Bakersfield. CA 93380 · FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4531 ID: ~2 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene p-Xylene m,o-Xylene Isopropylbenzene TPH (Gasoline) ug/g 98 275 23 58 66 5.8 1000 MDL,ug/g 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 1.0 Robert Michels Analytical Chemist RECEIVEB'?,7" 2 7 i~91 ~UqNIY'J.J,tO'J :!0 U38rll'l~l 0Y31 TYJOI IZ09! ~"~k'Y~JO ~lh'Y'~ 0 ~J IlIYIOA S'~INY~'J~ 0 O:IJY~3DO IYH IPIN 310U [3J "IYiO J 3SY3~ 1 ~0 It%) $ lh~LflllO~ '~ Ill} ~ql¥l]PI c~ CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT S. D. JOHNSON FIRE CHIEF January 9, 1992 2101H STREET ~ BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 UST Clean Up Fund California State Water Resources Control Board 2014 T Street, Suite~ 130 Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 RE: Operating permit for the underground tank located at 601 Eureka~St. Bakersfield, CA. State I.D. ~ 14905. Dear Sirs, This letter confirms that the tank located at the above stated address was legally permitted under both Kern County and the City of Bakersfield. While Kern County collected fees for the tank in April of 1991 they failed to issue a permit prior to the City of Bakersfield taking over the underground tank program on July 1, 1991. In addition, the tank was removed under Bakersfield City permit #BR-0031 prior to our issuing UST operating permits. If you have any questionS, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, ,~Joe A. Dunwoq~ / Hazardous Material Specialist Underground Tank Program FIRE DEPARTMENT S.D. JOHNSON FIRE CHIEF CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" January 9, 1992 2101 H STREET BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 John M. McCauley California Sheet Metal country club drive Bakersfield, CA 93306 RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site assessment conducted at the property located at 601 Eureka St. Bakersfield, CA. Dear Mr. McCauley, Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your facility, this office has determined that the extent of the contamination plume has not been adequately defined. This office requires (in accordance with chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code and chapter 16, Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations) that further assessment be done to define the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination plume. Please submit a work plan for further assessment, to this office, with in 30 days from receipt of this letter. The work plan should follow guidelines found in: Appendix A - Reports, Tri - Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Tank Sites; January 22, 1991. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. //Joe A. Dunwoody // Hazardous Material Specialist Underground Tank Program STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A COMPLETETHtS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY/SITE I MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [~] 4 AMENDED PERMIT ] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ,J~'~-7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED SITE ] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE I, FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS - (MUST BE COMPLETED) DBA ~ FACILI'?~AME NAME OF [3PER~TOR NEAREST CROSS STREET ADDRESS. PAR C L~. # (OPTIONAL) CA 0 ~ ~o~ ~ 71- I~/ TO INDICATE ~ COR~RATION ~DIVIDUAL ~ P~TNERSHIP ~ L~AL-AGENCY ~ COU~-AGE~Y ~ STATE-AGENcY ~ FEDE~L-AGENCY DISTRICTS 'PE OF BUSINESS ~ I GASSTATION~ ~ 2DISTR'"UTOR~ 3 FARM ~ 4 PROCESSOR ~5 OTHER I ~ ~ IF INDIAN " OF TANKS AT SITE IE'P'A' I'D''"ti'al)~ORTRUST~DS,RESERVATION' / " EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY), optional DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHQNf~ ~t WITH ^Ri[^ gg~l~ 11, PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION- (MUST BE COMPLETED) MAILING OR sTREET ADDRESS CITY NAM~ CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION v" mx to indicate ,,,~DIVIDUAL /"'-'] CORPORATION ~ PARTNERSHIP LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY IPH..~NE # WITH AREA CODE -'~"~/ III, TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME OF OWNER MAILING OR STREET ADDRESS CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION ~-'""~' 7'~/'~' ~ ~""""""~~ V" box to indicale ,...[~'~DIVIDUAL ~ CORPORATION [---[ PARTNERSHIP STATE I ZIP CODE [ PHONE # WITH AREA CODE I IV, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER - Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise, TY(TK) HQ J"~--~- I I I I CITY NAME LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY COUNTY-AGENCY ['"'-[ FEDERAL-AGENCY V, PETROLEUM UST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED J,/' ~xtoindlcate [~] I SELF-INSURED E~] 2 GUARANTEE I---] 3 INSURANCE r--] 4 SURETY BONO [---] 5 LE'n'ER OF CREDIT r--] 6 EXEMPTION ~ OTHER VI, LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notification and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked, ICHECK ONE BOX INDICATING WHICH ABOVE ADDRESS SHOULD BE USED FOR LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS AND BILLING: THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT [A~PLICANT'S N~.ME (PRINTED & SIGNATURE) /~ ~ .,~ I APPLICANT'S TITLE LOCAL AGENCY US~E O~ ' ~ COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # CENSUS TRACT # - OPTIONAL SUPVISOR - DISTRICT CODE - OPTIONAL LOCATION CODE - OPTIONAL THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY.AT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B~ UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY, FORM A (5-91) FOR0033A.5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE lANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A COMPLETETHIS FORM FOR EACH FACILITY/SITE MARK ONLY [] 1 NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED SITE ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT ~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 6 TEMPORARY SITE CLOSURE I. FACILITY/SITE INFORMATION & ADDRESS- (MUST BE COMPLETED) DBA O~g~ FACIL Fr~. ~IAM E NAME OF ~PER~TOR ADDRESS.& O/ .,~"'~,,'/J""-~,,~ NEAREST~..~/~ ~~ZP~cOCROSS STREET PARCI~. ~ (O~IONAL) CI~ NAME _ -- ~ ~ STATE I DE SITE PHONE ~ WITH AREA CODE TOINDICATE ~ COR~RATION ~DIVIDUAL ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ LOCAL-AGENCY ~ COU~Y-~GENCY STATE-AGENCY FEDERAL-AGENCY DISTRICTS ~PE OF BUSINESS ~ 1GASSTATION~ 3 FARM ~ 42 DISTRIBUTORpRoCESSOR ~5 OTHER I~ORRESERVATIONTRUST~ IF INDIAN ~' OF TA~S AT SITEILANDS E.P,A. I.D..(~ti~al) - . EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PRIMARY) EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDARY). optional DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE DAYS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PNC3NF # WITH ARFA ~F NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE NIGHTS: NAME (LAST, FIRST) PHONE # WITH AREA CODE II. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION- (MUST BE COMPLETED) CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION ./ box to indicate .~"~DIVIDUAL [~] LOCAL-AGENCY I'--] STATE-AGENCY r--i CORPORATION I'--] PARTNERSHIP r'--I COUNTY-AGENCY ~ FEDERAL-AGENCY III. TANK OWNER INFORMATION - (MUST BE COMPLETED) IPH...Q.NE # WiTH AREA CODE NAME OF OWNER ~ CARE OF ADDRESS INFORMATION MAILING OR-STREET ADDRESS ' ' f ~" ~ box to Indicate ~;;~"~DIVlDUAL [~] LOCAL-AGENCY ~ STATE-AGENCY / ~ CORPORATION -r-'-] PARTNERSHIP ~ COUNTY-AGENCY ~ FEDERAL-AGENCY CITY NAME / STATE ZIP CODE PHONE # WITH AREA CODE IV. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION UST STORAGE FEE ACCOUNT NUMBER- Call (916) 323-9555 if questions arise. TY (TK)HQ R- -I I I I I I I V. PETROLEUM MST FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- (MUST BE COMPLETED) - IDENTIFY THE METHOD(S) USED I./ box tolndlcate I---1 1 SELF-INSURED r--12 GUARANTEE ~ 3 INSURANCE [~ 4 SURETY ~tOND I"'--] 5 LETrER OF CREDIT ~ 6 EXEMPTION .,,,[~J~OTHER VI. LEGAL NOTIFICATION AND BILLING ADDRESS Legal notification and billing will be sent to the tank owner unless box I or II is checked. CHECK ONE BOX INDICATING WHICH ABOVE ADDRESS SHOULD BE USED FOR LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS AND BiLLiNG: THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT A~PLICANT'S N~.ME (PRINTED & SIGNATURE) .4' ~ /~ I APPLICANT'S TITLE DATE MONTH/DAY/YEAR LOCAL AGENCY USE O~ w- /~- COUNTY # JURISDICTION # FACILITY # LOCATION CODE - OPTIO. NAL CENSUS TRACT # - OPTIONAL SUPVISOR - DISTRICT CODE . OPTIONAL THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY.AT LEAST (1) OR MORE PERMIT APPLICATION · FORM B, UNLESS THIS IS A CHANGE OF SITE INFORMATION ONLY, FORM A (5-91) FOR0033A-5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARKONLY [~ 1 NEW PERMIT [~ 3 RENEWAL PERMIT ONE ITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [~ 4 AMENDED PERMIT ] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION I--~ 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE [] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE ~ TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK LD.# (~) / C. DATE INSTALLED(MO/DAY/YEAR) ///'~.~"~"/~L/~ ~ ~ I1. TANK CONTENTS ~F A-I IS MARKED, COMPLETE ITEM C. MOTOB VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OIL B. C. UNLEADED 4 GASAHOL [] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY ~ PRODUCT [] lb PREMIUM 7 METHANOL UNLEADED [] 5 JET FUEL -- [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT r-~ 95 UNKNOWN [] 2 WASTE [] 2 LEADED [] 99 OTHER (DESCRIBE IN ITEM D. BELOW)I D. IF (A.1) IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED C.A.S. #: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARKONEITEMONLYINBOXESA, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE B. MANUFACTURED BY: D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN -- [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER ] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC A. TYPEOF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL SYSTEM y2 SINGLE WALL B. TANK .~" BARE STEEL MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP (Primarymank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER ~ 1 RUBBER LINED ~ 2 ALKYD LINING ~ 3 EPOXY LINING ~ 4 PHENOLIC LINING C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING ~ 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION,~I NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER E. SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTA!NMENT iNSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IF ABOVE GROUND OR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEMTYPE A(:~I SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE ALI 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A(~I SINGLE WALL C. MATERIAL AND A {~::) 1 BARE STEEL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE ~, U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3MONITORINGINTERSTITIAL ~ OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] 1 VISUAL CHECK [] 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORING ~ NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION /~)~////~1~ / SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GALLONS iNERT MATERIAL? THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF I APPLICANT'S NAME [ LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. NI.~/~;~ COMP;SEE OF THE FOUR N~'MBERS BELOW COUNTY # JURISDICTION # STATE J.D..ff ~'~ FACILITY# PERMIT NUMBER FORM B (7-91) MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT TANK # PERMIT APPROVED BY/DATE PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM A, UNLESS A CURRENT FORM A HAS BEEN FILED. FOROO34B-R5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA .......... STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PERMIT APPLICATION - FORM B COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK SYSTEM. MARK ONLY r--] I NEW PERMIT [] 3 RENEWAL PERMIT ONEITEM [] 2 INTERIM PERMIT [] 4 AMENDED PERMIT [] 5 CHANGE OF INFORMATION ] 6 TEMPORARY TANK CLOSURE , . [] 7 PERMANENTLY CLOSED ON SITE TANK REMOVED DBA OR FACILITY NAME WHERE TANK IS INSTALLED: TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I.D.# (~ / c. OATE ,NSTALLED (MO,DAY, EAR) /~_/~-/~ ~., ~ II. TANK CONTENTS IFA-1 ISMARKED, COMPLETEITEMC. "'" ' MANUFACTURED BY: ~ MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL [] 4 OIL [] 2 PETROLEUM [] 80 EMPTY [] 3 CHEMICAL PRODUCT [] 95 UNKNOWN I- ~--~"~"REGULAR [~ 3 D,ESEL .... ... [] 6 AV,AT,ONGAS I B. , ' .... "1 ~%~,UNLEADED -'[~_['4.GAsAHOL .. ,~ ~ 7 M THANO I WASTE - ! ~ UNLEADED []2 I ,'[]2 L DED [] ,,,, OTHER DESCR,BE ,N ,TEM D. BE .OW,I C. A. S. #: ... .. , [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS .~r'-"~ 4 sTEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC D. IF (A. 1)IS NOT MARKED, ENTER NAME OF SUBSTANCE STORED III, TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXDANDE ...... A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ; [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM .J~'~2 SINGLE WALL -- [] 4 SECONOARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTEO TANK) [] 99 OTHEI~' e. TANK ~'" BARE STEEL MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN '[] 99 OTHER '' : "/ ~' ~~ 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOLIC LINING* C. INTERIOR [] 5 GLASS LINING ~ 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] ~9 OTHER LINING Is LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP E~],.~, COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP E~'4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION .Z~ 91 NONE ' [] 95 UNKNOWN . [] 99 OTHER E, SPILL AND OVERFILL SPILL CONTAINMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED (YEAR) IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNOOR U IF UNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE · A. SYSTEM TYPE A(~I SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE B. CONSTRUCTION A(~b") 1 SiNGLE_WALL C. MATERIAL AND A~) 1 BARE STEEL CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] I AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIAL IVIONITORING .~_~" OTH E R ~"~/~.~'~'~/ V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] I .VISUAL CHECK [] *2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VADOZE MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUND WATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TEBT.NG [] ~ ,NTERST,T,ALMON,TOR,.G ~ NONE [] .6 UNKNOWN [] ~ OTHER VI. TANK CLOSURE INFORMATION IPERMIT NUMBER FORM B (7-91) SUBSTANCE REMAINING ~ GALLONS INERT MATERIAL ? THIS FORM HAS BEEN COMPLETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BE'~T OF MY KNOWLEDGE, IS TRUE AND CORRECT I APPLICAN'PS NAME ~' DATE LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY THE STATE I.D. N~S COMPOSED OF THE FOURNUMBERS BELOW ' COUN~ ~ JURISDICTION · FACIL~ ~ TANK THI~ FORM MU~T BE AOCOMP~IED BY A PER~ ~PLICA~ON - FORM A, UNLES~ A CURRENT FORM A ~A~ BEEN FILED. FOROO34B-R5 P.O. BOX 6278 December 30, 1991 · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93386 · (805) 589-5648 RECEIVED 'JAN 0 3 1992 HAZ ~,~ AT. DIV, Bakersfield City Fire Department ATTENTION: Joe Dunwoody Hazardous Materia!._Di~ision 2130 "G" Street Bakersfield, Ca 93301 SUBJECT: Permit ~BR--0031. Dear Mr. Dunwoody: On December 17, ]991 CALPt~ Inc. removed one (1) 550 gal!on under- ground.~ ',ga so l i,ne tank, fr~' 601 ~eka'St eet, ,Bak'e~rsfiel. d ,. Ca ,. , ...... ,.'fhe ~an.k l!yas~ de'~oH'taminaEed, o~ 'stYe us.trig a h~gh pressu[e steam cleaner.apd .inerted.~wil;h:~d~y. ~ce~-r ,Rinsate was disposed o.fi at G~.].)k{~']~".'~e~fini:hg' }in -'Bakersfield, California under 'hazardous w~ste manifest ~ 91482426. The tanks were remowad to Golden State Metals. Soil' was sampled under the direction of Bakersfield City Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. The samples were analyzed at SMC of Bakersfield for TVH-BTX gas. A uomplete ch.·mi- cal analysis is enclosed. In addition to the ].ab results, copies of the manJ.[:est, chain ...... cust_.o_d,y.~an_d~_th~ _tank_.d_isposition .tr. acking. ~recor.::l- -is enc!~sed-.- Please contact our main office at (805)589-5648 if you have an.y questions or require further information. Sincerely, Pat Mul lhofer ' ~ Supervisor Endlos. ur~:~-. -. .~.. , ~ ., . , · , . ........ N6te.d'..this.. co'.r.responde'nce. · 'M;[-:': John 'Mc(Saul:eye,, :Bak:er~'l.~;, J. '-L. Environmen'ta], Fairwood Street,~.Bakersfield,.:~ Santa Maria, California 93454 (805) 925-2231 · Bakersfield, California FAX (805) 589-5312 Analytical Chemistry Client Name: CALPI Inc. Address : PO Box 6278 Bakersfield, Calif. 93386 Attention : Mr. J.P. Mulhoffer Date samples received : 12-17-91 Date analysis completed: 12-23-91 Date of report : 12-24-91 Project Name: N/A Project ~ : 4644 ~ . O.---~ .... ~-~03,-~3~595- 9-1~ RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4530 ID: ~1 ug/g Benzene 44 Toluene 170 Ethylbenzene 19 p-Xylene 47 m,o-Xylene 53 Isopropylbenzene 7.6 TPH (Gasoline) MDL,ug/g 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 810 1.0 Method of Analysis for BTX/TPH (Gasoline): 5030/8020 (FID) MDL = Minimum Detection Level ...... TRH__~ ~ota.1 Re~.rol.enm.H~drocarb,o.ns .......... ug/g = micrograms per gram (ppm) ND = None Detected Robert J. Michels Analytical Chemist 3155 Pegasus Drive P.O. Box 80835 · · Bakersfield, CA 93308 Bakersfield, CA 93380 · ·(805) 393-3597 FAX (805) 393-3623 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: ~4531 ID: ~2 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene p-Xylene m,o-Xylene Isopropylbenzene TPH (Gasoline) ug/g 98 275 23 58 66 5.8 1000 MDL,uu/u 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 1.0 '. Michels Analytical Chemist DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS UNE. DHS 8022A (127;~0) WNle: TSOF SENDS IHIS COPY 10 DHS Wtlt41N :~3 DAYS. EPA 8~]0--Z~ 1'o: P,O. Box 3~. Socr~rnento. CA q5812 GOLDEN STATE METALS, INC. P. O. Box 70158 · 2000 E. Brundage Lane Bakersfield, California 93387 Phone (805) 327-3559 · Fax (805) 327-5749 Scrap Metals, Processing & Recycling N° 10177 TA~[DISPOSAL FORM Date f . C' / ? ,19 ~ Contractor's License No. Contractor's r---~,(~ Phone No. co.-c,o.: DESTINATION: G.S. ~. · 2000 E. BRUNDAGE LANE · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93387 L~~K INSPECTION _ L_~ CLEAN & DRY (ACCEPT), OR [] RESIDUALS PRESENT (REJECT) LEL READING OXYGEN CONTENT DISPOSAL FEE SCRAP VALUE OTHER ' ' ~ TOTAL QT¥ GALLONS SERIAL NO. NET TONS 250 .14 ............. ~ .................................. ;;; ................................................................................................ i;; ............................ i:i:::ih:: . .::: i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i P:::':::':::'::i i F::!:':'! :':';!ili i i i iiiii i i: ..... :i:i:? i iiiiiii i Eiiil i P'::"ii i i i i iiiii ! Eiiii 1000 - 6 ff .61 2000 .97 3000 1.32 5000 2.42 ~i.?:!~i.~.~:.~.~.~.?:.~.~.~.~:.~.::.!.~.~.~:.?:.~.~.::.i.i.~.?.~....~.~i.ii~ ............. !.~6...,ii...,..,,.,.i 7500 3.28 9000 3.82 ~i.{.i.~i.i.~.~.~i~i.~.~i~i~i~!~i.i~.~{.{.i.~.~.~!.!.~.~.i.~.~.~.~.~.~.i.~.~.~?~?~i.~.~.~i~:i~.~,~,~!i!i.~ 12000 4.93 TOTAL All fees incurred are per load unless specified. Terms are net 30 days from receipt of tank. Contractor's signature represents acceptance of terms for payment, and confirms that tank removal complies with State laws. CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE /~ CERTIFICATE OF TANK DISPOSAL / DESTRUCTION THI~ I~ T¢~"""~Y THE ~REC~PT AND ACCEPTANCE~HE TANK(S) AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL MATERIAL SPECIFIED WILL BE COMPLETELY ,.*__~T,~E~ FOR'~?~I,R~CL,.~ PURPOSES ~LY. \ WHITE-- Contractor Copy · YELLOW -- File Copy · PINt( -- Permanent Copy 0 0 (D rtz_ o o BAKERFIELD CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION R 5 ~. ~- ~ V ~_ ~ UNDERGROUND STROAGE TANK PROGRAM DEU 1 1991 -'PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK Ans' ............ Site Infromation Site Address 601 EUREKA FacililtyNameCALIFORNIA Tank Owner/Operator JOHN Mailing Address 601 ZipCode 93305 APN ,N/A SHEET HETAL Cross StreetKERN MCCAULEY Phone 871-1251 EUREKA, Cit~BAKERSFIEL~ip Code 93305 Contractor Information Company CALPI, INC Address P O BOX 6278 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Phone 589-5648 Ltcense~'A" 506025 CitlBAKERSFI~.ZiP Code93.386 Workmans Comp ~1011809 Prelimanary Assement Information Company CALPI, INC. Phone 589-5648 License#~A".506025 Address P OB OX 6278 CityBAKERSFIEL~ip Code 9~3R6 Insurance Carrier STATE FUND Workmans Comp #1011809 Tank Cleaninq Information Company CALPI, INC. Phone 589-5648 Address P 0 BOX 6278 CityB~KERSFIEL~ip Code93386 Wate Transporter Identification Number 207294 Name Of Rinsate Disposal Facility GIBSON REFINING Address END OF COMMERCIAL DR. CitlBAKERSFIRI.D Zip Code 93308 Facility Identification Number CAD 980 883 177 Tank Transporter Information. :{~i:' i..'~.i ~,' ~:': Company CALPI,. INC. · .... : ..... · ... - Phone . .589-'5648 Address P O BOX 6278 ....: ? .... CityBAKERSFIF, r,FZ~p.i.C_,?de' 93386 Tank Destination GOLDEN STATE ~,~TALS Tank 1 TANK INFORMATION !NC - ~g~oxV~kl~e Chemical'. .. Da.}~'es~.~St ored STATE FUN2, Stored 550 Stored For Official Use Only Application Tanks_~ Fees The applicant has recieved, understands, and viii comply with the attached conditions o~ this pe~it and any other State, Local and Federal regulations. }. r :,,, ~' . This form has been completed under' penalty of perjury, and to the .heel: of n~ knowledge', is true and correct. ~'A~~d B~ Applicant Naa(print?' . Applicant S~na,ure- THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED P , '2~' ": '.'.: :-' ' .- ~.-:.{' :~' . ' ,:-~-. PLOT PLAN '~\~:Plot2 plan must show the following: 1. roads and alleys; 2. buildings; 3.location of tanks, piping and dispensers; 4. · ~util'lties; 5 SCALE; 6 water wells (if on site); 7 any other relevant information. TANK ~ (FILL O[JT SEPARATE FORM ~ TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES Ho 1o Tank is: [-]Vaul6~d [']Non-Vaulted [']Double-Wall I-]Single-Wall UNKNOWN Tank Material [] Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [-] Fiberglass-Clad Steel []Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic .[']concrete [] Altm~inum [~Bronze ~]Unknown' [] Other (describe) 3. Pti ~mary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches). Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer ..... ] 950 ' ~ ......... UNKNOWN .... ' UNKNOW~ , ;v'~- 'v UNKNOWN- 4. Tank SecOndary Containment [']Double-Wall '~] Synthetic Liner [-]Lined Vault [~None []']Unknown [] Other (describe): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining ---~R{Jbber [3Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic [~]Glass []Clay []Unlined ~-]Unkno~n []Other (describe): .' 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ........... --]~Galvani zed ~a~S=-~l~- ['lTar or Asphalt ~known [~None []Other (describe): UNKNOWN Cathodic Protection: [K]NOne []Impressed Current System ~lSacrificial ~ode System Descrfbe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Moni.torin~, and Interception a. Tank: DVisual, (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitorirg' Well(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) []U-Tube Without Liner ~[3U-Tube with' Compatible Liner Directin~ .Flow to Monitorirg Well(s) vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor [-] Conductivit~ Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank7 ['] Liquid [%etrie~al & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space D Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightness Testing ~ None ~ Unknown [] Other b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak. Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'w [3Monitoring S~p with Race~y []Sealed Concrete Race~y [3Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway [3Synthetic Liner Race~ay [3None [] Unknown [] Other *Describe Make & Model: - UNKNOWN . . 8. Tank Tightness ~is Tan~ Been Tightness Tested? [~Yes ClNo [~Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing Ccmpany 9. Tank ~ 'Tank Repaired? [3Yes ~No [~Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protecti6n []Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level []Tape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [-]Auto Shut- Off Controls ~Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box []None [~Unknown []Other: List Make & Model Fo~ Above Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: []Yes [2114o [~Unknown Material Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer [3Pressure []Suction [3Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe ~ b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection ~ []GalvaniZed '[]Fiberglass-Clad - []Impressed Current -~[]Sacr{ficia~ -Ar{ode ~Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation ~']Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or Asphalt ~Unknown ['~None []Other (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: I-]Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System []None ~]Unknown [-]Other (describe): Rern'Co'Unt~ Health Departmen/ Division or Environmental Hea~t~ 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, 93305 Permit Appl i ca t i on "APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Application (check): DNe-~ Facility DModification of Facility [~Existing Facility ~]Transfer of Ownership Note :-~.~,This --facility was- -purchased -in 195 2?~t~fi~'~fefore-;~.tt_:.,t.e_~n~fo~s~kn A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days John M. McCaul, e¥(805)323-839 Nights John M. McCaulev(805)87].-12 Facility. Name California Sheet Metal No. of Tanks~ One ......... ......... ~ 6fBusiness (check): {']GaSOline Station ~Other -(describe) Sheet Metal & A/C Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Fam? ~]¥es ~No Is Tank(s) Used' Primarily for ~gricultural Purposes? [']Yes Facility Address 6Ol F, nr~ka St~ Nearest Cross St. ~er~n St. , , , T R SEC (Rural Locations Gnly) Owr~r . Jnhn M- ~C~nl ay Contact Perso~ same , ~ddress 6~1 w.n~ka ~qt. Bakarsfield zip _.93,30,,5 Telephone 323-8398 -. ........... Address Z~p Telephone . . ., B. 'Water to Facility Provided by Califor,,nia Wat, e,r Dist,: Depth to' Groundwater Unknown Soil Characteristics' at Facility UDkqo,Wn . ~ '" ". Basis for Soil Typ~ and Groundwater DePth Deteminations " . ' ' C$ CA Contractor's License No. Cont factor TTn ~ n own Address Zip Telephon~ Proposed Starting Date Proposed Completion [Nmte , i .... . ,' Worker's C~mpensatto~.certificati°n ~ Insurer . ,' Ds If This Permit Is For Modification Of An E~isti~ Facility, Briefly Das~ribe Modifications Proposed N,/~ , ~ Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ! Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded .Regular Premium Diesel Waste 0 [] O [] Chemical C~position of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vmhicla fuels) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~ercial name) CAS ! (if kno~) Chemical Previousl~stored " ' (if' differ6nt) G$ Transfer of Ownership Date of ~-ansfer ~ / a . Previous Facility Name' I, ~ify or temi~ate' the Previous Owner accept fufly all obligations of ~mi~ No. is~d to · I understand that the ~ermitti,] Authority may 'review and transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergro%md storage facility upon rec~.iving this c_cmple_ted This f~'~s been completed under penalty of S ig na tu~ perjury and to the best of my knowledge is Title .Owner Date 3~11/85 · PERMIT CHECKLIST - This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received an___~d that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first'phase of monitoring requirements. Please complete this form and return to R.CHD in the self-addressed envelope provided ~-wi~hin-.3_.pq days of-receipt.- ................... · ................. ~ ........ :._~:-.:,.: ?-;.:-~ ~' ...... Check: Yes -No A. The packet I received contained: <_ .... 1) Cover Letter; Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phas~ I Interim Permit ....... ,. ...- .......... -=.Monitoning.--Requirements, Information ~.Sheet .... (Agreement _Be~ween..~Owner .... and. Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-3941), Equipment Lists and Return Envelope. Explanation of Substance Codes, 2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook gUT-10. 3) The Following Forms: .a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Recording Sheet with summary on reverse c) Trend Analysis Worksheet 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) 3) Water-finding paste D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this facility is the operator ('if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have had calibration checks within the last 80 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook). G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was st'arted at this facility in accordance with procedures descr, i.bpd~in Handbook ~UT-IO. Title: ~L.~ k~~ 0~ 5 Date: [ ~ 6 -- Permit Questionnaire ....... Normally,-permits are sent to facility Owners but since Owners 'live outsi,de Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators o.f the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: For PERNIT # 1. .Send all information to Owner at the address · listed on invoice (l,f Owner ts different than Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent tnformat ion). 2. Send all information to following corrected address: Owner at the 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit Owner). for FILE ,jONT ENT.~ ~permit to Operate ! It]Construction Permit I ~Perm/t to abandont N~. 6~ T~nks .... ~ended Permit Conditions . ~permtc ~ppttcaCton Eorm, / ' ~a6'~' SheetS, [_']Application to Abandon [::]COPY o£ ~ritten Contract-Between Ovner "a O~erago~ Date Date Date tanks(s) Date ['lCorreapondence - Received : .. Date ' Date #a I I ed C]Correapendence'- Unauthorised Release Reports Abandoneent/Cloaure Reports Date Date Date C3Saipling/Lab Reports I'I#VF Compliance Check (lde~ 'Conatruct£0n ~570 C~pliinae Check (Ney Construction ~HVF Plan Check (Ney Construction) ~STO Plan Check (Ney Conltruction) ~HVF Plan Check (Existing Facility) ~S~O Plan Choo~ (.Existing Facility) ~"Incomplete Application" Fora ~Permit App~lcation Checklist' ~Permit Instructions ~Discarded ~Tightneil Teat Relulti -- ~.onito[i~ Hell Const~uction Data/~ecmI~s Checklist) Checkl iai) [~]Bnvironmental Senaitiv'ity Data; Oroundvater Drilling, Boring Logs Location og Water Wells I-1statement og Underground Conduits Peaturing' All Bnvironmentally Sensitive Data ion '~ Locat : tally oE inspe c ~Plot Plan I-I Photos l-IConstruct ion Dravings I-Ilialf sheet shoving date received and [::IHt $cel laneous I"'" 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Telephone (805} 861-3636 'ffr/N COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN'[, ~ UNDERGROUND .HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. . · ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ..... "' DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . ~:'. PERMI T-~e'l~'5"Oe'o,9 C' : ~-XPI ~-S -'-~'" JULY 1, 1989 ' '~. ~?.CAt. IFORNIA SHEET METAL "~ [ MCCAULEY, JOHN M.:: 2:.:';~::'~?'¥ ........ · · , "(' 601 ~EUREKA STREET I 601 EUREKA STREET' "-"'~' ii:??'.' ...~./'i'ii.i~,::i~.;-.,:i~)i?::i,BAKERSFIELD,. CA ... ~.' :':'/". ~?i,.. ~i:' ':'.i','1 . .' ' :r~BAKERSFIELD,: CA '.:i~,93305 ';. '"v~,':'J-~:~i"..TANK # 'i;'i'~-~,¢~AGE{'IN YRS) , SUBSTANCE CODE ' :, PRESSURIZED PIPING? '". ..... :.~-"~NOTE= ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PE~ITTING 'i!/?:~;~}~.~:~',~,~-.' ..'(,- :, ..'.:7 ~-.?. ;:.,-,..", [' t ~.~:~.~';~ '. ~ ..,: i' .-,, , .. ~' .:" ~ ".: .'- . .', · .~. ' '" :' .... ::.:: '.: .'.' -:.',,~'-~ ~'k t':~'.??~c:' -:;,',',~ J:q;~.-.'~g~'~:,'~-~'~" ,.. [ .......... : .......... NSFERABLE'"* * * ".POST :' ON '~PREMISES '~ DATE. PERMIT MAILED: JUL 1 6 1986 DATE PERMIT (/-IECK LIST RETLS~'ED: