HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK-C-11/01/90FILE CONTENTS
SUMMARY
SENSITIVITY: . .
Activity, Date # Of Tanks
Comments
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAUINATiON SITE REPORT
NAME O~ INDIVIDUAL FILI~ ~RT PHONE ~ SIGNA~ :.
LYDIA V. VON SYD0W (80~ ~61-3636~ .....
2700 "H" S'T., STD. 300, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
~E~ ~ ~A~
[NVESTER~S THRIFT ~w. JOE ZUHWALT ( ) 'U::-;:~ .~:;
2602 STREE BAKERSFIELD CA 93301 .... ,, '
F~LIW N~E (IF APPLIC~ ~ OPE~TOR . P~NE ,
I
SPEEDY CATERING ~ ( )'~
~ A~CY ~CY ~E ~NTACT PER~N P~NE .....
KERN CO. ENV HEALTH SERV 'DEPT LYDIA V VON SYDON (805
CENTRAL VALLEY ( )
(1) NAME QU~T~ LOST (G~LONS)
GASOLINE
~DI~RED Y ~WOI~D ~ IN~O~ROL ~ SU~URF~EMONITORaG ~ ~I~E~NDITDNS
~UR~ oF OI~.ARGE c~s~(s)
~ T~K~ ~ UN~O~ ~ OVERF~ ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ SPI~
~E~ ONE ONLY
~ UNDerMINED ~ ~ILONLY ~ GROU~WA~R ~ DRINKINGWA~R-(ONEOKONLYIFWA~LSNAVEA~YBEENA~EO~D)
~E~ ONE ONLY
~ NOA~ONTA"N
~ L~I~IRMED ~ PR~N~A~SI~E~ME~UNDERWAY ~ ~ST~NUPMONffORINGINP~G~
~ REMEDIA~ON ~ ~ CA~ ~ED (C~UP ~MP~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ ~P UNDERWAY
CHE~PROPRIA~TION(S) ~ ~CAVA~&DISPOSE(ED) ~ REMO~EP~CT(F~ ~ ~CEDBD~GR~ATION(I~
~ ~NTAI~ENTBARRIER(CB) ~ ~T~NREQUIRED(NA) ~ T~A~ENTAT~O~P(HU) ~ ~NT~.IL~S)
RANDALL L. ABBOT].
DIRECTOR
DAVID PRICE []
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
I OURCE MANAGEMENT ENC¥
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTM SERVICES DEPARTMENT
November 10 1990
Emvi~onmemai Health Ses, vices Department
STEVE McCA! ! I:y, REHS, DIRECTOR
Ab' Pollution Control District
WILLIAM J. RODDY, APCO
Ptannin~ & Developmem Sen~:e~ De~'tmem
TED JAMES, AICP, DIRECTOR
Joe Zumwalt
Investor's Thrift
P. O. Box 365
....... Bakersfield,.CA__93302 ..... : ..................... --.--~ ...... ~
SUBJECT': Location : 315 Lake Street,.
Known As : Speedy Catering
Permit # : 140001
.Bakersfield, CA
Dear Zumwalt: ~
This letter confirms the completion of Site investigation and remedial action at
the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency
was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is theposition of this
office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the
California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future
operations at the site. Nor does it relieve youof the responsibility to clean up
existing,'additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause
or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwisepose a threat to water
quality or public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the p~esent or proposed use of the site
may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is.the
property owner's responsibility to notify, this agency of any changes in report
content, future contamination findings, or Site usage.
If you have any questionsregarding this matter, please contact joe Canas at (805)
861-3636, Extension 588.
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Hazardous Materials Management Program
CB:JO:cas
\140001.clt.
2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300
,BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 861-3636
FAX: (805) 861-3429
WATER RESOUREs CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UST CLEANUP PROGRAM
SITE SPECIFIC QUARTERLY. REPORT
CONTRACTOR NO:
SITE NO:
SITE NAME:
15000
140001
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
FEDERAL EXEMPT:
SPEEDY CATERING
ADDRESS:
315 LAKE STREET
L SUBSTANCE: 8006619
N PETROLEUM:,' Y
JOE ZUMWALT
INVESTER'S THRIFT
REMEDIAL ACTIONS TAKEN: NA
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
SPECIALIST: 6
SENSITIVITY: NES~
CONTACT NAME:
COMPANY NAME:
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
RP SEARCH: S
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT: C
REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION: C
REMEDIAL ACTION:
POST REMEDIAL
ACTION MONITORING: N
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
TAKEN: N
RAP REQUIRED:
CASE CLOSED: Y
DATE EXCAVATION STARTED:
CATEGORY:
SITE STATUS
CONTRACT STATUS: 9
EMERGENCY
RESPONSE:
DATE UNDERWAY: 06/07/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 05/31/89
DATE COMPLETED: 06/07/89
DATE COMPLETED: 06/08/89
DATE UNDERWAY: 07/31/89 DATE COMPLETED: 09/29/89
DATE.UNDERWAY: '11/09/89
DATE UNDERWAY: /. /
TYPE:
DATE COMPLETED: 10/18/9~
DATE COMPLETED:
DATE TAKEN:
DATE APPROVED:
· DATE CLOSED: 11/01/90
ADDRESS: 2602 "F"STREET ..................... VERi~'iED"'(X) .................. ,'
CITY/STATE: BAKERSFIELD,i CA 93301
ABANDONMENT #: A924-14
DATE OF REPORT: 11/05/90
LEAK REPORT: Y
CASE TYPE: S
- CITY/ZIP:
'DATE CONFIRMED: 06/07/89
DATE REPORTED: 06/07/89
October
~ 5400 ALD~IN CT.
groundwater
inc.
resources ~/.~-~$ 24 m~.~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93313
//~n~-- ilk '%-~,~, General En~ineerin~ Contractor
. /~v ~". Class ~H~z License No. 520768
Kern County Neal~h Depar~men~
D~v~on of Environmental Health
B~ker~f~eld, CA B3301
Investor's .Thrift ._' ....................................
SDeedy. Catering
315 Lake Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Canas,
Enclosed please find the Remedial Action Plan for Investor's Thrift
dated October 18, 1990.
If you should have any questions or require further information,
please contact me at (805)835-7700.
Sincerely,
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
Dale A. Johnson
Registered Geologist ~t4864
DAJ:tdc
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9383, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389
LOS ANGELES,(213) 724-3147
(B05) 835-7700
grouhdwater resources inc.
5400 ALDRIN CT.
BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93313
General Engineering Contr~actor
Class A/Haz License No. 520768
~. INVESTOR'S THRIFT
· Speedy Catering
........... .......................................................................................... 315 Lake Street
t Bakersfield, California
I~ REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN
.: October 18, 1990
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 9383, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93389
LOS ANGELES (213) 724-3147
(805) 835-7700
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
Speedy Catering
315 Lake Street
Bakersfield, California
REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN
October 18, 1990
1.0
2.0
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
TABLE OF CONTENTS'
3.0 FINDINGS
5.0 DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
6.0
REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVE
6.1 No Action Alternatives
6.2 Excavation and Bioremcdiation of Soil
6.3 Excavation and Aeration of Soil
7.0
8.0 REFERENCES
COSTS OF REMEDIATION
7.1 No Action
7.2 Excavation and Bioremediation
7.3 Excavation and Aeration
9.0 LIMITATIONS
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate 1 Location Map
Plate 2 Plot Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A Chain of Custody and Laboratory Results
Appendix B
4.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Groundwater Resources Inc. (GRI), a RESNA Industries company, has been requested to review the
boring logs, laboratory soil analysis, and assessment report for the former Speedy Catering site located.
at 315 Lake Street iffBakersfield, Calii~omia~ '.The followMg is a dis~iission of the previous assessment
work; and GRI's recommendation of three (3) remedial action options per the requirements of Kern
County's Department of Environmental Health Services Handbook UT-35. _.
2.0 BACKGROUND
In May 1989, a 10,000 gallon underground gasoline fuel storage tank was remove from the Speedy
Catering Site located at 315 Lake Street (see Plate 1). Contaminated soil was detected at the site during
the removal and four (4) assessment borings were advanced (see Plate 2) to assess the lateral and-
vertical extent of the contamination plume.
3.0 FINDINGS
Soil samples taken from boreholes were analyzed Using EPA Method 8010/8020 for benzene, toluene~
xylene, and ethylbenzene (BTX&E) and EPA Method 418.1 for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
in gasoline. Complete laboratory results are in Appendix A (attached) and summarize, c[ below:
OCTOBER 18, 1990/Page 1 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
4.0 GEOLOGY ANDHYDROGEOLOGY
This site is located within the modem Kern River alluvial fan complex. River sand and overbank clays
and silts of the fan onlap and_.w_~dge,pu~ twp.._._:(.2)_miles t~__t)__..e.?orflaeast onto Plio-Pleistocene~non~
marine coarse alluvium which makes up the lOw rolling hills northeast of BakersfieldL The sediments
penetrated by the borehole are characterized by river channel sands and overbank clays and silts.
There is only a relatively small mount of stratigraphic variation in texture in all four (4) of the.
boreholes.
KeTM County Water Agency reported the depth to unconfined groundwater in the Spring of 1990 to
~.-be-130 feet below-ground-level at. this. site_2._.
5.0 DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the information available, it was determined that two distinct contamination plumes exists
under the former tank site (see Plate 2). The northern-most plume (approximately 150 cubic yards)
was probably the result of spillage during dispensing and fillup. The southern-most plume (approximately
50 cubic yards) was the result of corrosion to the steel tank. Both plumes are assumed to be cylindrical
in plan view.
6.0 REMEDIATION ALTERATIVE
In review of the data obtained from the borings, laboratory results, and repons the following three (3)
alternatives are considered in the final closure of this site.'
6.i No Action Alternatives
No short term threat to air, soil, surface waters, or to bioreceptors exist at this site
because of the presence of the gasoline plumes in their present state. The 4-inch thick asphalt seal
overlying the plumes have negated the diffusion of the gasoline plumes to the surface.
This site does not meet all of the sCreening criteria in Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 2-4 of the LUFT Manual
(4) for a general risk appraisal (see Appendix B). The toluene, xylene, and ethyl-benzene ~oncentration
reported in Boring B-3 exceeds the maximum allowable level on the Environmental Fate Worksheet
(Table 2-4). However, the long term health risk to air, soil, surface waters, and bioreceptors would
be extremely low based on the surface coverage of the 4-inch thick asphalt cover.
It cannot be' determined, from the data available, whether the local groundwater would be impacted
from the downward migrations of any hydrocarbons contained in the gasoline plumes approximately
110 feet above it. Therefore, the short and long term risk to the local groundwater cannot be
-determined at thistime..Howe~er, the 4dnch thickasphalt cover_would prevent.percolation of surface
water throUgh the gasoline plumes to the local groundwater.
OCTOBER 18, 1990/Page 2 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
6:2 EXcavation and Bioremediation of Soil
With this remediation alternative, the contaminated soil would be excavated and treated
on-site u_ri!~zing the bioremediati°n techniques described below. The excavated soil would be spread
on' Plastic' in dimensions not to exceed 0.5 feet in depth."The soil should be bermed to control run--
off, and fenced to prevent unauthorized entry. The soil should be treated with nutrient fertilizers and
bacterial Cultures that are specially adapted to degrade heavy petroleum hydrocarbons. The soil must
be regularly turned and watered to promote bacterial growth. The area should be covered with pla~stic
during periods of heavy precipitation. Verification samples should be collected and analyzed on a
regular basis to determine the clean-up progress. The excavatiofl should be backffil!ed with clean fill
material and the site restored to its original condition. The short term health risk for this altematix~e
spraying the soil with water as it is excavated from the site. The soil should be treated until the samples
collected verify that the hydrocarbons are below levels set by the Kern 'County Department of
Environmental Health.
The' short term health risk for this alternative would be from the dust produced during the excavation
operation. This risk can be mitigated by spraying the soil with water as it is excavated from the site.
The soil should be treated until the samples collected verify that the hydrocarbons are below levels set
by the Kern County Department of Environmental Health.
6.3 Excavation and Aeration of Soil
With this remediation alternative, the contaminated soil would be excavated and stock
piled on-site. A composite soil sample should be collected and analyzed for BTX&E and TPH
gasoline. Based on the laboratory results, the contaminated soil should be spread on site in dimensions
not to exceed 0.5 feet in depth as per the guidelineS set forth in Regulation 8, Rule 40 published by
the Kern County Department of Envixonmental Health. The soil should be bermed to control run-off,
and fenced to prevent· unauthorized entry. The soil must be regularly turned to promote aeration of.
the hydrocarbon compounds. The area should be covered with plastic during periods of heavy
precipitation. Verification samples should be collected and analyzed on a regular basis to determine
the aeration Progress. The excavation should be backfilled with clean fill material and the site restored
to its original condition.
The short term health risk for this alternative would be from the dust produced during the excavation
operation. This risk can be mitigated by spraying the soil with water as it is excavated from the site.
The soil should be treated until the samples collected verify that .the hydrocarbons are below' levels set
by the Kern County Department of Environmental Health.
It is recOmmended that the soil at this site be allowed to degrade through the natural
biodegradation processes presented in Section 6.1. This alternative presents a cost effective
method of cleanup with minimal risk to the public health and the environment.
OCTOBER 18, 1990/Page 3
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
7.0
COSTS OF REMEDIATION
7.1 No Action
- The cost that could be expected with the ':No Action;' alternative would be limited to
restoring the asphalt removed during tank removal. This work has already been completed, with no
further costs anticipated. ,,
7.2 ExcavatiOn and Bioremediation '.
With this remediadon alternative, the cost for excavation and treatment of the soil is
estimated to be $25,000.00. This price neither includes the cost to restore the site with asphalt nor the
'cost'to provide shoring'that may be required for the adjacent building~
7.3 Excavation 'and Aeration
The cost of this remediation alternative is estimated to be $20,000.00. This price.
.neither includes the cost to restore the site with asphalt nor the. cost to provide shoring that may be
required for the adjacent building.
8.0 REFERENCES
1. State of California Division of Mines and Geology.. 1965. "Geologic Map of
California, Bakersfield Sheet". Ferry Building, San Francisco, California.
2. Kern County Water Agency. "Water Supply Report". Plate 4} April 1990.
3. USPEA. 1988. "Cleanup of Releases from Petroleum USTs: Selected Technologies".
4. "Leaking UndergrOund Fuel Tank Field Manual", Oct. 1989. State of California, Water
Resources Control Board, Leaking' Underground Fuel Tank Task Force.
9.0 LIMITATIONS
This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Investor's Thrift as it' relates to the property
described. The discussion and conclusions presented in this report are based on:
- The test borings performed 'at the site.
- Previous soil sample analysis provided to GRI.
,- The observations of field personnel.
- The results of laboratory tests performed by BC Laboratory, Bakersfield, California.
- Our understanding of the regulations of Kern County and the California Regional Water
........ .~Quality Control Board:-
OCTOBER 18, 1990/Page 4
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
INVESTOR'S THRIFT
Possible variations in the soil or groundwater conditions which may exist beyond the points explored
in this investigation might effect the validity of this report unless those variations or conditions come
to our attention and are reviewed and assimilated into the conclusions and recommendations of this
report. _Also, changes in the hydrologic conditions fqund occur, with time due to variations
temperature, regional water usage, or other factors, any of which could effect this report..
The services performed by GRI have been conducted in a manner consistent with the levels, of care
and skill Ordinarily exercised by professionals cun'enfly practicing under similar conditions in
C~!ifomia. The absence of contamination on or beneath the property cannot be guaranteed by this
report. GRI is not responsible for any contamination or hazardous material found on the property. No
.other. warranty- expressed or implied, .is .made.. ....................................... ...................
Respectfully Submitted,
GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
Dale A. Johnson, R. G. ~864 ~I6n. P. Fitch
Manger of Technical Services General Manager
OCTOBER 18, 1990/Page 5 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES INC.
!
000*
FOUR
groundwater resources, inc.
envioronmental/geotechnical services
SPEEDY CATERING
315 Lake Street
Bakersfield, California
LOCATION"MAP
PLATE
1
alley
to Lake Street N
I
to Inyo Street
telephone
~!i~!:::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::~!iiii!¥!i!~!~i!!!!~!~!~!~!~!~!!~!~::i~i
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: :n:::: :.:.:,: :+:.:.:.:,:.:.:.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.:!:~:~:~:i:~:i:i:~:i:~:i:i:!:~:i:i:!:!:~:!:~:~:~:~:i:~:~:~:~:~:
================================================================
water main transmission lines
groundwater resources, inc.
environmental/gem~cii~ical services
SPEEDY CATERING
315 Lake Street
Bakersfield, California
PLOT PLAN
PLATE
2
APPENDIX A
Chain-of Custody and
Laboratory Analysis
ENYIRONI~ENT,4L
¢1iE¥1C41. ANALYS~S
LABORATORIES, INC.
· J.J. EGMN, REG; CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
(SOIL)
Earth Systems Environmental
170-A Granada S~
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
Date of
Report: ll-Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
05-Sep-89
Constituent Units
Benzene ug/g " 9.67
Toluene ug/g 220.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 62.00
~Xylene ug/g 92.20
m-Xylene ug/g 216.04 ·
o-Xylene ug/g 133.54
Total Petroleum
Hyd carbm
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
05-Sep-89
Analysis Reporting
Results Level
3070.94 5.00
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
07-Sep-89
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA met?~d 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102
n
'~i-~ Sample Desc: ~ES-0169-BBi S~cdy Catering 315 Lake' St Bakersfield
[:
Boring 3 @ 20' S4 9/05/89 @ 11:30 AM
£NVIRONIIENT'AL
CNE~IC4L ANALYSIS
PETROL£UI/
J
$ Ep N $188~
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGHN, FIEG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
" '- (SOIL) ........... '
Earth Systems Environmental Date of
2323 E St RePOrt: 19-Sep-89
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: Myke Lane
~,:, ~: ?~.~_., ..........
Bo~i~ 3 @ 25' ,~5' 9/05/89 @ 12:00~
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
05-Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @' LAB:
14-Sep-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPS:
16-Sep-89
Minimum
Reporting Analysis RePOrting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 28.62 0.02
TolUene ug/g 457.29 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 113.38 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 159.27 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 369.20 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g '223.09 0.02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons · ug/g 5621.81
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for g~-soline by D.O.H~$..L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
I California D.O.H.S Cert. ~102
i~''' E~IVIRONI, IENTAL
r CHF. I/IC4L ANALYSI~
i. PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
. PHONE 327-4911
(SOIL)
Earth Systems Environmental
170-A Granada St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
A%tention:
Date of
Report: ll-Sep-89
Sample Desc: 'flES-0169-BB1 S~cdy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
Boring 3 @ 30' S6 9/05/89 '@ 12:30 PM
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
05-Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
RFL~ @ LAB:
05-Sep-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
08-Sep-89
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent units Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02
Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02.
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g none detected ~ 0.02
m-Xytene ug/g none detected .0.02
o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
none detected 5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by .EPA method 8020.
Dry M~tter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
_
' ElfVIRONI,~FJfTAL
CHEI~IC4L ANALYSIS
PETROLEU~I
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGUN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4i00 PIERCE RD' BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
P~rgeable Aromatics
Earth Systems Environmental. Date of
170-A Granada St Report: ll-Sep-89
San Luis ObisPo, CA 93406
Attention:
'." Lab No.: 6994-5'
~oring 3 @ 35' S7 9/05/89 @ 12i 45 PM
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
05-Sep-89 05-Sep-89 0?-Sep-89
MLu~m
Report'.z~g Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02
Toluene ug/g none detected 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected 0.02
P-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g none detected 0.02
ug/g none detected '5.00
TEST METHOD:
TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dzy Matter Basis
California' D. O.H.S.
Cert. ~i02
!,
i - ENVIRONAtFJ~T~4L
i CXERICAL AI~LI'~IS
i~ETROLEUR
I
LABORATORIES, INO.
Earth Systems Environmental
170-A Granada St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
Lab Noo:
Sample Desc:
DATE SAMPLE
CO~:
05-Sep-89
BerAzene
Toluene
Ethyl .Benzene
p-Xylene
o-X~lene
Total Petroleum
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Purgeable -AromatiCs
.......... (SOIL). -- --~
PHONE 3274911
Report: ll-Sep-89
6994-6
~ESr0169'BB1 S~cdy-Catering ---3iS--Lake - St ~ Bakers fie-l~d
Boring 3 @ 40' S8 9/05/89 @ 1:00 PM
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
07 -Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
05-Sep-89
Min. im. zm
Reporting Analysis Reporting
'Units Results Level
ug/g none detected
ug/g none detected
-ug/g none detected
ug/g none detected
ug/g none detected
ug/g none detected
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
ug/g none detected
TEST ~H~D: T~H for rg~Solille by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA met~ 8020.
Dry Matter Basis .
5.00
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102
APPENDIX B
............ ' ........................ ~Leaching Potential-Analysis
· o ' Table 2-1 .
Leaching Potential Analysis for Gasoline
Toluene, Xylene and Ethylbenzene (BTm&E)
and
Benz
ene,
ollowin table was designed to permit estimating the concentrat~.''~
The f g · ..... ~ ;- ~=~e without threatening
o= ~n=~u ~ ~..- ............. ~ ---centrations-'were-derlve~
water. Th ........ 4_~_ ~=~ories of low, medium or
1-aching potential. TO use .~ne c~=, ~, . ¢= = ....
-~ - . core each feature using the we~ghtlng.s~s~a~.
zor each of the .features_ _S ....... :-~- ~- each column an~ ~o~al
shown at the top of e~ch ~o~um~. ~u~_. ~.~u%~E and TPH levels.
them~ Match the total points =o un= =~u,=~ ~
................................ · ......................... .... S ........ SCORE ........ ;-S ......... SCORE
SZTE ¢ 10 PTS ¢ 9 PTS ¢ 5 PTS
0 IF CON- O IF CON- 0 IF CON-
FEATURE R DITION ' R DITION R DITION
E IS MET E IS MET E IS MET
Minimum Depth to >100 51-100 25-50~
Ground Water from the
Soil Sample (feet)
Fractures in subsurface None Unknown Pres.ent
(applies to foothills ~O
or mountain areas)
Average Annual <10 10-25 26-40~
Precipitation (inches)
Man-made conduits which None Unknown Present
increase vertical lO '
migration of leachate
Unique site features: None fl At least More
recharge area, coarse one than one
soil, nearby, wells, etc
RANGE OF TOTAL POINTS 49pts or more 41 - 48 pts 40pts or less
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 1/50/50/50 .3/. 3/1/1 NA~
B/T/X/E LEVELS (PPM)
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 1000' 100 10
TP.H LEVELS (PPM)
· \~ If depth is greater than 5 ft. and less than 25 ft., score 0 points.
If dep~h~'-5-ftT"-or~=less-,~this-~abl,e~h°uld--n°t--be-'used''
~ If precipitation is over 40 inches, score 0 points.
~ Levels for BTX&E are not applicable at a TPH concentration of 10ppm
TABLE 2-2
GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL
FOR PROTECTION OF WATER QUALITY:
APPLICABILITY CHECKLIST
1. Is the site in a mountainous area? (shaded moist
areas &/or ~areas with rocky subsurface conditions)
2~.~Is~the site in 'an ~area~that could coilec~ SU~face'
runoff or intercept water from a source other than
the natural precipitation?
3. Does the areal extent of soil contamination
~ exceed 1000 feet,?
4. Do the concentrations of fuel constituents in any
............... Soil.~samptes-~exceed~th~-~f611o~ih~-a~6~nts~-~ ............... ~..
benzene - 100 ppm, toluene - 80 ppm, xylene - 40
ppm, ethylbenzene - 40 ppm?
5. Are there any records or evidence of man-made or
natural objects which could provide a conduit for
vertical migration of leachate?
6. Do any boring or excavation logs show the presence
of fractures, jOints or faults that could act as a
conduit for vertical migration of leachate?
7. D° any boring logs show that contaminated soil
could be within 5 ft. of highest ground water?
8. Do any boring logs show the presence of a layer of
material, 5 ft. thick or more, which is more than
75%' sand and/or gravel?
Directions:
1.
Boring logs taken during the general risk
appraisal can be used to answer questions 5-8.· In
addition, analytical results of the soil samples
taken during the general risk appraisal can be
used to answer questions 3 and 4. ~'
Lateral migration of constituents to problem areas
shoUld also be considered in questions~5-8. --
The above checklist contains.questions which are
designed to identify sites with environmental
conditions which could produce a greater risk to
ground water than was modeled. The results of the
'general risk appraisal are most apPlicable if all
of the questions on the checklist can be answered
"no" with reasonable certainty. If any of the
questions on the checklist cannot be answered
"no", .then the results of the general risk
app~aisal~ma~be~tess~al~.
30
TABLF~-3
ENVIRONHENTAL FATE UORKStlEET FOR ~.~c"~~. (FUEL CONSTITUENT)
i1111111111111
SURFACE TO J S~PLE TO I = I S~PLE TO I J~T~I.ATIm JmNT~I.ATIO. JYES IF E > F
:¢~:~:~'~:~:~:E:~?~:~:~:~:~:~:E:::?~:E:E:~:E:~:~:~:E:E:E:~:¢¢~:¢~:~:¢~:~:~:~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:i:~:~:~:~:~:¢:: :¢~:~:: :~: :?~:~::: :~:~:~: :: ~ I [ ==============================================================================================================================================================================================
...............-...-...v.-.v.v.....-.... · · ......-.......-.-.-...-.-...-.-.-..:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .............................................
:::::::: ................................. :5 ~ t ....................
':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':'::':':":':':':':':':':':':':':':':':* ~PLE 9 f~:~:~:~:~:]~:~:~= C.C.L. 9 :'¢~:'::'::~:?¢~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .... no~:~:~:]:;:]:~:]:~:~
Ct S~PLE 10 ~¢~?~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~=C.C.L. 10 .:::::::::::::'.:. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ye~:~:~:~ no::~:::;::;::~:~.;.
.................. ........... :...::..._, ............... ~-: - :,;~,:,.,. ; ':.',;;', ............ ..:.:.....,., ...... ... ........ ................ ................. ........... .......................................... ;:.., ....... :.:_..~
· :4-z.:,:.?:~.:(+z4 ~.;.:.:~z~.z(~( ..................................................... ============================================================== ...........................................................................................
.......................................................................................... :;;;;.;;;:~;;~:::;~;::;~~ ~ ~ ~ =====================================================
ft = feet ppm = parts per mittiorl
*. NOTE: CONCENTRATIONS FOR ANY SINGLE SOIL SAHPLE CANNOT EXCEED lOOppm FOR BENZENE, 80pgm FOR TOLUENE, /,Oppm FOR XYLENE
ANO /+Oppm FOR ETHYLBENZE.NE IN OROER TO BE USEO WITH THE GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL.
THE LAST SAHPLE TO BE INCLUOED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR CUMULATIVE CONTAI41NATION HUST BE AT OR ABOVE THE
DETECTION LIMIT; DO NOT ]NCLUOE 80TTO~ SAHPLES WHICH NAVE CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN THE DETECTION LII4IT.
SURFACE TO I I S~PLE TO I
TABLE
ENvIRoNNENTAL FATE ~3RKSHEET FOR
-* .: O - = ....... ... E ....
SAJqPLE TO J ICONTA,qlNATION
GROUND t~ATER J JLEVELS C.C.L.
(FUEL CONSTITUENT) .
i1111111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIiil
JACCEPTABLE J CLEANUP? J
CONTM4INATION lYES IF E > F
LEVELS I NO IF E -< F
I
S~PLE
· 10 ft ~PLE 2 I~ f~:~:~:.~:~? C.C.L. 2 ~ :~:'::'f~:~:~:~:~ .............. ~:~:~[~:~
~.:~.:~-:.:~.:~-
:.?:.:~:~:~:.:.:~:.:~:.:.:~:~:~:.:~:.:~:~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:~ s~Pc~ ~ ~:~::~::~::~..~:.~:.~:...~~~:~ / ooo :~~y~:~.:~
· :.:-:-: ............................ ~. ~.:.:.:~.:~.:~.
':':':': ......................................... ~PLE ~ j(/O f~:~:~:[:~:~:~:~:]~+= S~PLE ~, I ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::~:~:??~:~:~:?~:~:~:~:[:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:?~:~:~:~:?~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:]:~?~:?~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ ·
........................................ . ......... c.c.c. ~~~[~::~::~::~"/'~' ..... ~?::~::~::~::~::~;~::~ ....... ~'~'~:~::~::~:~?::~::~[~??:~
__ S~PLE S (~ f[~:~:~:~:~:~:~:]~:~' S~PLE 5~m~=========================================================================================================================================================
t ft ~PLE 6 __f~]~]~? C.C.L. ~ :~:~:[:~:~:~:'~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .yes~;~:~:~ ~:~:~:~:~:]:~:~:~:]
.:.:.:.: ..............................................................................
.... ~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:[:~:~:]:~:~:~:]:~:~:~:[:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ ~ S~PLE ? ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:]:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:?~:[:~:~:[:]:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:]:~:~:~:[:~:~[:~:~:~:~:~:?~:~:~:~:?:~:?]:~:~:~?
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:[~ ft ~PLE ? J f~:~:~:~:~:]:~:]:~:~= C.C.L. 7 :::~:::~'~:~:~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: yes'~::::: ~:~::~:~::?~::~
yes:;:::::
~-::::::;E
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: c.C.L. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~t S~PCE 9 J :::::::::::::::::::::: C,C,C, 9 :::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: yes:;::::: ~:::::::::::::::::::
v.v.v.v.v.v,'.'.v.v.'.','.';,'.v.';;.',-:.v~,';~ ....... v.'.';;.'.';~.';;.'. ';.'.'.'."'.';.'~;;.':-.'.'?.'; =." ':-:-?-:':-:- 9:9:-:-;;:".';'-" · .....v,-.-.-.v...v.,....-..-.~ .......................................................................
::::'::: :.::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: J::::::~::¥'::::::::::::::::::::: S~PLE ~ ~ - ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::]:~.~:~::~:~.
~:~:~:~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::...:: ================================================================================ ...:..:....~.:~:].~:~:~:~:.::.,~;:.....:,....'.:. :....~.:: :::::::~.~.~:~.:::..:..:~;::~:~.:.::.:.:.~,':.:~.:~.[.
:~:::~:: ::~:::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: I~:~:~:~:]:~:~:~:~:~:'~:~:~:~:~:~:~::~:~:~:~;~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:'j::~: ?~: :~:: ~:~ ~:~:~ ~S~CE ~ Z ..................... ~: : ~:?::: :: :::::.~ :::::::::::::::::::::::: :~ ~:~ ~:~ .. ~ _ ~::~:~ :~'~
:~ :~::~::~?.~::~::~::~::~::~::~::~::~::~:?:~::~%:?:~::~::~:.~. .......... "=~'~J':'"""~'~['['~"~"~'"' '"""='"""~'['~:~< c L ~ · :::~::::::::::: ....... '"::':'::':'::':'"': y~S';':-: ,o.',--' ....
::::;::; ::.:::::::::::::::::::::::~::~:::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::~:::~::::~..........~..~...~..~......~.........~...............~...~..~.=.~=.~...~.....~....... .. ~...~.~...:;:~::~:::2::~:~::.~..~...~......~....`~.~.....~..~.~~:::~:::~:~:?~:~.:;.~:~:~:~:~::~:~:~:~::~..... ...::~::~... :'.~::::::::"::':'
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~??:~:~:.~.::.~:~:.~.:~?:.:~:~:.:.:~:.?:.:~:~:~:.:.:.:.:.:.:~:~:~:`:~:~:.:~:~:.:~:.?:.:.:~:~:~:.:~:~:~:~:.::~:`.v:.:.X~:~:.?:~:.::.:.:~::.:~:.:...:.:.;~X.:::.:.:.:.:::~:~.:.: ::.::,'-:.v......:-x.-:.:-::.?:-:.:.:-'.-'.
~?;~?/~.~:~?.~.~?~;:~.~.~:~::;~:::¥~ZZ~:?..:~.:~:;~.~:~/~;~.~.:.`~...; ........................................ ~ .................................................................... ~=~-~: :-'-=-:
ft = feet pCm = parts per miLLion
NOTE: CONCENTRATIONS FOR ANY' SINGLE SOlE SAMPLE CANNOT EXCEED 100ppm FOR BENZENE, 80pp'n FOR TOLUENE, 40ppm FOR XYLENE
AND 40ppm FOR ETBYLSENZENE IN ORDER TO BE USED t~IITH THE GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL.
THE LAST SA,qPLE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR CUMULATIVE CONTAMINATION HUST BE AT OR ABOVE THE
DETECTION LIMIT; DO NOT INCLUDE BOTTOM SAHPLES 14H[CIt HAVE CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN THE DETECTION LIMIT.'
· TABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL FATE UORKSHEET FOR
CLMULATIVE
CONTAM[ NATION
LEVELS C.C.L.
(FUEL CONSTITUENT) · .
GE A
C~T~INATION IYE~ IF E · F
LE~LS I NO IF E ~ F
I
· ft = feet ppm= parts par mittion
NOTE: CONCENTRATIONS FOR ANY' SINGLE SOI~ SAMPLE CANNOT EXCEED lOOppm FOR BENZENE, 80ppm FOR TOLUENE, 40pl3a FOR XYLENE
AND 401mpm FOR ETNYLBENZENE IN ORDER TO BE USED UITN THE GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL.
THE LAST SAHPLE [0 BE ]NCLUOED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR CUMULATIVE CONTAMINATION MUST BE AT OR ABOVE TNE
DETECTION LIMIT; O0 NOT INCLUDE BOTTC~ SAJ4PLES ~NICH HA1/E CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN THE OETECTION LIMIT.
I SURFACE TO I
'TABLE 2-3
ENVIRONNEHTAL FATE ~3RKSHEET FOR~/-~'~
SAMPLE TO I = I SAHPLE TO I Ic°NTA~INATI°~
SUN,ACE I IG"O""D UATERI ILEV L, C.C.L.
(FUEL CONSTITUENT)
Ilii1111111111
IIIIIIIIIIII1'1
ACCEPTABLE
CONTAMINATION
LEVELS.'
ICLEANUP?I
YES IF E > F
NOIFE<F
=============================
:24:) ft
SAMPLE
SAHPLE
SAMPLE
SAI~PLE
SANPLE
SAMPLE
C.C.L.
:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:.:.:.:-+ SAHPLE
/ ~.- b f ~ili[i~iiiiiiiii = C.C.L.
C.C.L.
SAHPLE
I/~' fti:iiiiiiiiiiiiii? C.C.L.
C.C.L.
~' SAMPLE
((0 ft::iii~iii~iiii-::'iii= C.C.L.
........................ C.C.L.
SAHPLE
5ft
SAMPLE 6
SAMPLE ?
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.v.v ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ft
:::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iiiiii:iiii!:iiiiiiii}i:iii :i:i:}}i!i:iii!iiii}iiiiii!iii!}{iii!iiiiiii!i!i
i?:iii:: i:;:;ii::iiiiiiii~:;i~:;iiii::i::iii?:;i:iiiiii::ii:;~i:~i:.i:~i;~i~:::?:i?:~:::? ....... '"'% ........ ~'~'&""i"~""
'?::~?::iil] ::'iiiiiii:;ii?;i;:i?iiiiiiii?i:/~i~??i~:;ii?i~?i?::~:'"~'"~'~'""~' "~ iili ii ill ~'.. i's';~h'~:'~":!"i'~'" ~
SAMPLE 9
SAMPLE 10
C.C.L.
......... '"""""'"'"'"'"""' SAMPLE 6
__ft:i'i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i= C.C.L. 6 :"-'":::::::::::: .................. noi:i:i:i:i'i:i'i:i:i
ft:i:i:i:i:i:]:!:i:~:i= C.C.L. 7 :::::::::::::i:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: yes:i:?]:: noi:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:i
·:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::::::.~:::::::::::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::~:~~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~.
~ ::::::::::::::::::::: C.C.L. 8 :::::::-'::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: yes:::::::: no:::::::::::::::::::
================================================ C.C.L.
fti:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i= C.C.L. 9 :::¥2::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ye~::::::: no:':::i::::::::::::
:. :~:.:::::..::::~:::::i:::i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::?::::::::::::::::::::::~:::.:::::.:::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
f t !:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i=C. C. t. 10 .'.-.-.'...-.-.- :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ===============================
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: C.C.L. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:?iiiiii:.i:::::ii!::i::iii:.!ii::i::i::ili?::iiiii+ S AN p LE :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ft = feet pcm = parts per mittion
NOTE: COHCENTRAT!ONS FOR ANY SINGLE SOIL SAHPLE CANNOT EXCEED lOOppm FOR BENZENE~ 801~rn FOR TOLUEHE, 40pDm FOR XYLENE
AND 40pDm FOR ETHYLBEHZEHE IN ORDER TO BE USEO ~ITH THE GENERAL RISK APPRAISAL.
THE LAST SAMPLE TO BE ]NCLUOED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR CUMULATIVE CONTAHINAT~ON MUST BE AT OR ABOVE THE
DETECTION LIMIT; DO NOT INCLUDE BOTTOM SAMPLES ~H[CH NAVE CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN THE DETECTION LIMIT.
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE M¢CALLEY
Director
RESOURCE ~ENT
DEPART :NMENTAL
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Baker.field, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
February 5, 1990
Investor's Thrift
2602 ".F" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Proposed Mitigation Action
Dear Mr. Zumwalt:
This department has completed the review of the selected mitigation option
for the contaminated soil at the Speedy Catering facility located at 315 Lake
Street in Bakersfield, California.
Our review has determined that the selected mitigation plan is approved for
implementation. However, it is customary for this Department to reqtiire an
evaluation of a "no action" scenario for mitigation. Our preliminary information
indicates that this site maybe suited for "no action". Further evaluation should
be performed by your consultant, and be performed with your consideration for
the future for this site.
Please advise this office of your intentions within 10 days of receipt of this
letter. Should you have any questions I may be contacted at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
' ~~joet~Can~as~-~'''
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JC:cd
cc: Earth Systems Environmental, Inc., Mike Lane
R.L.W. ~quipment, Bud McNabb
cana.s~umwalt.let ................................ ~ ............................ ~
.Earth,. Systems Envirc
A Member Of The Earth Systems Group
2323 E Street · Bakersfield, California 93301 ·
Earth SystemS
EnVironmental, Inc.
A Member of The Earth Syslems Group
' Mike Lane
Engineer
2323 E Street
Bakersfield, California 93301'
(805) 861-8020
FAX (805) 324-2712
Environmental Consulting · Soil & Ground Waler Characterization and Remediation
R.L.W. Equipm~_lTC
2080 S. Union Avenue ,
Bakersfield, CA 93307 (II~[ISSION NO. B-20085-B06
.~'- : ~ ES-0169-BB2
315 ~~
~~ ,:~ n, C~?.3".;I::HH~I2k 93305
PE~41T#14000 ·
In response to your request, we feel the __rec~_~__' ~_tion for ex=avation and
disposal of contaminated soils Will be the most expeditious and cost-effective
z-~.~aedla~ alternative for the subject site. ~-~ is based on the
characterization .study dated Sept_~mher 29, 1989, ar~ d/scussior~ with the.
approximately 20 feet in diameter, and extend to an anticipated maximum depth of
30 feet below ground surface (bgs). ~%e south excavation would be
'approximately 10 feet in diameter and extend to a total depth of 18 feet bgs..
~h~ tc'~e3..~,mu,~, of ~o..n~.~.~. so~3. to ~ .~v~ t~ _~-ti.~.~..~ated to be 280
cubic ya~s.
Excavated soils should be monitored in the field both Visually and using a
photoionization detector (PID) or comparable instrumentation to determine t/m
presence of contamination. Excavation of contaminated soils should proceed
until the soils remaining in place are thought to be acceptably uncontaminated.
Open excavatior,-~ should be fenced With standard 'OHHA safety, fer~ir~.
~e to p~xiaity of u~ ~d~ti~ b~X~ to U~ ~~d ~vatio~, it i.~
reccmmer~___ed__ that the services of a soils engineer be retained to evaluate the
potential for structural damage resulting from the exca~ration.
ES-0169-B~2
E~v~ Health Department h~-~ been removed. Soil samples should be
collected at the direction of a Kern County Health Department r~_prese_ntative .
· ' :.~:.-.~:.=~.~,-:~'="-?~ar~- be hela'-:for laboratory, analysis. Soil samples should be sealed with Teflon
film, capped," taped and Placed on ice for transport to a California oertified '
Once ~e~oved, the contaminated so~l- should be ~nifested for ~9~osal at a
. and local .re,relations. ..
E~vation m~ ~ ~hould be ~_~ne by a 9ualifisd o~=acto= an~ in
.accordance with Ur~_er~ Tank Regulati~ set forth in OC~ Title 23, the
L.U.F.T. field ~] (SWRCB,. 1989), as well as applicable 'state and county
·
Soil samples collected during e~cavation should be sent to a state-certified
laboratory for chemical analysis. Ail of the soil samples should be analyzed
for Total petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline ar~ the B~X&E ~ by
D.O.H.S. (L.U.F.T. Method/EPA Method 8020).
Results of the chemical analysis should verify that contaminated soils have
.. been ~e~uoved from the site to levels at or below the action l~ts specified by
100.00 pp~ ~ petrolem h~h~uar~ms (g~oline)
0.30 ppm Benzene
0.30 l:~am. Toluene
1.00 ~ Total Xylenes
1.00 p~m Ethylbenzene.
Table 2-1, LUfT ~, March 1989, California Water Resources Control Board:
Ex=avation .ar~ ~ of the contaminated soils to th~ above levels should
envirnnment. Once em=avatio~ is ccmplete~, th~ potential for migration of
'~%e cost for excavation and disposal is estimated to be approximately $90,000
to $100,000. AI~ a rigorous cost-analysis has ~ been completed, we feel
this cost is comparable or less than the other remediation alternatives noted
in the characterization study.. Additionally, excavation a~d ''.disposal should.be
the 'mt '~tious '-f-~-~ti0n'-alternative'- for"~'this site.
ES-0169-BB2
It is_~ t~at a qualified geologist or e.~g/neer be on-site, to.observe
the e~cavations' ar~'collect soil samgles. ~ co=~let/c~ of the field
~ letter has been pre[k~red for the ex=lusive use of R.L.W, Equ~n~ as it
.i~ai~s ~to..the 9roperty. lo~ated ~.at~. 315 ?~ke Street,._~Bakersfield, Californ/a._~
29, 1989. Ail ~3rk ~as been performed'in accordance with generally aocepted
hydrogeology. No other warranty, either ex~ress or imglied, is made.
~ you for this og~=rb~ity to have been of service. If you have any
tb~ office at your oonvenienoe.
Midlael K. Taqe, PE #P1642
RESULTS OF INITIAL SITE cHARACTER~ATION
SPEEDY CATERING
BAKERSFn~J~D, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 29, 1989
ES-0169-BB 1
Earth. Systems Environmental, Inc.
A Member of The Eart/1 Systems Group
2323 E Street · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (805) 861-8020 · FAX (805) 324-2712
ATTEntION:
I.
~ING:
R.L.W. Equipment
2080 S. Union Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93307
CO~.DilSSION NO. B-20085-B07
...................... - .................. --.,-~,- ........ · ...... · ..................................... ES=0169=BB1 ..... · --
Bud McNabb, Service Manager
RESULTS OF INITIAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION
OF UNDERGROUNDFUELTANKSITE, SI:~Y CATERING
315 LAKE STREET
BAKERSFI~, CALIFORNIA 93305
Permit #: 140001
1.0 INTI~ODU(IrION
This report presents the results-of the initial site characterization conducted
at the above referenced property. The purpose of this investigation was to
determine the extent of h)xirocarbon cont~uuination identified in May 1989 during
remo~l of an underground storage tar~. The scope of work performed to date
has consisted of a) drillin~ four exploratory borings, b) collection of
undisturbed soil samples, c) laboratory anal)mis of select soil samples, d)
review of prior data from the ta~ pull, e) data analysis and f) preparation of
this report. }~thods used are in a~coIxt~nce with underground tank regulations
and guidelines se~ forth in CCR Title 23, Chapter 3, the Leaking L~derground
~Mel Tank (LU~) Field Manual (C~nCB 1989), and applicable Kern Count~
regulations.
2. SFrEDESC~r~r~ON~~
Currently, the site is a vacant commercial property consisting of five single
story garage/office buildings. The site 'is located south of Lake Street
between Inyo and Alta Vista Streets, in Bakersfield, California (refer to
Figure 1). Prior to 1988,.the property was the local headquarters ,for Speedy
Catering.
A 10,000-gallon underground gasoline fuel tard~.was installed prior to 1970 for
storage and fueling of catering vehicle~. Information regarding inventor~-
monitoring,'tank integrity testing, repairs to the tank or piping, and past
spills or leaks are not a~ilable.
Elevated levels of petroleum h}~trocarbons were detected upon removal of the
'ta~k, conducted by.R.L.W. Equipment, in' May 1989. Tank remo~l was done in
a~co~ce with the closure requirements of the Kern County Health Department,
VICINI-I-Y MAP
SPEEDY CATERING
315 LAKE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 933o5
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
PERMIT No. ,14ooo1'
i,
FIGURE. 1
PREPARED BY, EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL
2323 E STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805) 861-8020
9/5/89 MKL
Corm No. ES-0207-BB1
.Handbook .#UT 30 ........... Refer to Appendix B for anal.vtical test~results~ for soiL_.__~ ...... ~
samples, taken bel°w the tank during remo~l. Inspection of the tank found pin
size holes on the lower portion of the tank at the South end. ~
The site surface areas are either covered b? paving or concrete slabs, except
in the 10 by 50 foot tank excavation, located west of the south center building
(refer to Figure 2). The excavation has been backfilled with silty sand
material. Surfm~e grades appear to slope to~Rrd Lake Street on the north and
the 'alley at the southprope~ ~%~e. ............................................. ..................... - ................... - ..................
3.1 Regional Geology
The subject property is located in the 'San Joaquin Valley , the southern
portion of. Great Valley geomorphic province. The San Jgaquin Valley is
surrounded on all sides by mountains, except toward the Central Valley to the
nor~. The Serria Nevada R~mge consisting of the Greenhorn, Tehachapi and
Kiavah Mountains form the barrier on the east southeast side of the valley.
Soils in the area are composed of in a]lm'ium laid do~ during times of hea%~-
runoff from the Sierra .-NevaM~ dua-ing or following the Pleistocene. Based on
the Soil Survey of Kern County, California': Northwestern 'Part, September 1988,
Kimberlina and Cajon soils are mapped in the vicinity of the site. They are
predominate]y sandy loams with moderate to high permeabilil~ and overall high
to moderate ~ter capacity.
· 3.2 Hydrology
Based on the "Water Supply Report, 1988" and discussions with Ken Turner of the
Kern County Water Agency, the regional depth to ground water has been measured
at 125-135 feet with a gradient tou~rd the west-northwest. Depth to ground
~ter at the site may be shallower, considering the proximity of the unlined
cham]el running parallel to and on the north side of Lake. However, no ground
~ter was encountered at forty'(40) feet the maximum depth of exploration.
4.0 SITE ASSESS%~N~r METHODS
4.1 Drilling and S0il Sampling
On SeptemberS, 1589, four borings were drilled in the area of the former
undergrou~d sto~age fuel tank, at the locations sho~ on Figure 2. The borings
were drilled to a maximum depth of 40 feet below ground surface (bgs), using a
truck-mounted S-inch dimneter hollow stem aug~r type drill rig.
Soil samples were collected from each bering at five foot inter~ls, sampling
~s accomplished using a.~3r~.n~h ~diameter _~plit,sPoon _Sampler.__equipped..with
Stainless steel liners for soil retention. All sampling equipment was cleaned
with TSP and rinsed with deionized water between sample interx~ls 'tominimize
the possibility of cross-contamination. Samples were imediately sealed with
· SPEEDY CATERING i. ~ ~ . .
......................... L .................... ~ LAKE. ST ........ : ........ .4 ........ ' .......... 7 ..... ;' .......... :
TO
INYU 'hr'
.... BLDG
.(.VACANT
iBLDG, i ...
(.VAC _ANT )
C, on~No. ES-0207-BB1
Teflon-film, -capped, taped:'and-' held'--on
transported to a California certified anal)lical laboratory according to proper
EPA protocol, observing chain-of-custody procedures. All auger' flights/drill
bits w~re steam cleaned prior to use and between borings to prevent cross-
contamination.
~6ils were monitored during drilling for evidence of hydrocarbon contamination
using a portable photoionization detector (PID). Soil cuttings and sample
.......................... -...-.spoils~ were._plaCedin~ DOT_approved 55-gal-Ion.barrels, ...... A/.1---barrels-~are~stored
in the building east of the tank site pending identification of proper disposal'
methods. Borings were logged by a qualified engineer in accordence with the
Unified Soil Classification System, under the supervision, of a California
Registered Geologist. Boring logs are presented ~n Appendix A.
4.2. Field Observations
As observed in the borings, earth materials beneath the site consist of
alluvial soils, ~ich extend' to the m~ximum depth exTlored of 40 feet bgs.'
These soils consist of brown to grey. bro~au silty sand (Sb. 1) and fine sand (SP)
with scattered gravels and minor caliche cementation.
,Moderate discoloration, accompanied by a moderate gasoline odor ~s recorded in
soils from 15 to 30feet beg in boring B-3. No indications of hydrocarbon
contamination (odor, discoloration or PID readings) were apparent in any of the
remaining borings, nor were recently placed fill soils visibly contaminated.
Ground water was not encountered in any of the borings.
5.0 ANALYTICAL MEq~ODS
Eight soil samples, selected on the basis of visual evidence of contamination
and PID readings, were submitted to a State-certified laboratory for anal)~ieal
.testing. Each sample was analyzed for total petroleum h~xirocarbons (TpH) as
gasoline by the California DOHS (LUFF Manual)method and for benzene, toluene,
xylene and ethyl benzene (BTX&E) bY EPA Method 8020. Refer to,Appendix C.
6.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Results of soil anal)~ical testing are summarized in Table 1. Analytical
results, along with QA/QC documentation and chain-of-custody forms are attached
as Appendices B and C.
6
CommNo. ES-0207-BBI'
Sample No. · TPH Benzene Toluene Xylene Benzene :
B-l, S4~20' ND ND ND ND ND
B-2, S4@20' ND ND ND ND
B-3, S4@20' 3070.94 9.67 220.10 441.78 62.00
t "' B-3, S5@25' 5621.81 28.62 457.29 751.60 113.38
B-3, S6@30' ND ND N~ ND ND
......... ~"'~ ~L'B~-:-S4@20''~ .... ND ..................... ND ........... .....ND ............ ; ..... ND ............... ND
May, 1989 Tank Pull :
N. end ~2'* '29.57 ND 0.01 5.00 0.04
! N. end @6'* 3660.11 ND 5.48 64.33 7.08
~-- S. end @2'* 2734.64 0.07 4.14 78.06 8.49
S. end @6'* 23.07 ND ND 0.14 -ND
ND: Not Detected.
*: Denotes the depth below tank invert, approximately'Il' bgs.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
An~l}~ical results, obtained during this investigation and the prior tank
pulling operation, indicate the leaked fuel products at the site are in two
separate contamination plumes at opposite ends of the tank. Migration from
both sources appears to be relatively limited in vertical and aerial extent.
Refer to figures 2 and 3 for plume definition.
Pin size holes on the lower, portion .of the Lank end appear to aCCount for
contamination in the southern plume, refer to lab results Appendix B. The
lateral extent of this plume appears to be limited to a rough cylinder 10 feet
in diameter. The contamination extends vertically from the backfilled
excavation bottom (approximately 11 feet beg) to 18 feet beg.
Spillage during dispensing and fillupmayaccount fgr the contamination in the
larger northern plume, refer to lab results Appendix C. The lateral extent of
this.plume appears to be limited to a rough cylinder 15-18 feet. diameter. The
contamination ex~ends vertically from the hackfilled excavationbottom
(approximately ll feet beg) to 27 feet beg.
The Division of Environmental County currently
Health
Services
for
Kern
doeS'
not have any applicable soil action limits. However given site-specific
conditions, the following action limits are outlined in the LUFr Manual, March
1989, California Water Resources Control Board, Table 2-1:
'VIER
FICAL CROSS-SECTION
BUILDING
EAST OF EXCAVATION)
B-2
(N~) J
":' ~11 ~o*
ANALYTICAL.LAB RESULTS,
(BENZENE CONCENTRATION PPM)
.:.TPH CONCENTRATION PPM
TANK EXCAVATION:
(9..7) ~.':
\I II
U (28.6)
ND
k.~)'i:!':!:'EsTIMATED PLUME BOUNDARY
SCN..E'm.: HORZ · ! = 10~
· X - 2735'/
'hid ~I ND ( ND~"
i'1--~.' 2~,
ND M ND '
II
ND I~ ND
.~FiGURE 3
SLF~ER I IvtmOSED
TO CROSS-SECTION
s~
SAMPLES TAKEN USING BACKHOE IN MAY 1989 DURING
TANK PULL OPERATIONS @ 2~ AND 6~ BELOW TANK BOTTOH.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
SPEEDY CATERING
315 LAKE STREET
i BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
i, PERMIT # 140001
:, EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL
" il 2323 E STREET '
~, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805)-861-8020
8
CommNo. ES-0207-BB1
.-.... ...... ..... :. .... ~.~:ppm._T~ta~..Petr~Ieum~H5.z~r~carb~ns~(~as~ine).::~..~`~:~::~:.:~:
0.30 ppm Benzene
0.30
1.'00 ppm Xylenes /
1.00 ppm Ethylbenzene ~/~
^ copy of this table'is attached as Appendix
'Ben~ 'i~--'i~eluded on--the Pro~sition · 65~ list' ~-of ~chemicals"as-~'-'kno~a--human ..........
carcinogen.
8.0 ~ATIONS
Based on the data obtained, to date, it appears that 'the zone of soil''
contaminated beneath the site poses a potential threat to public health and the
surrounding environment. The concentration of fuel products, particularly
benzene and TPH exceeds action levels as 'outlined in the LUFr Manual;
consequently~ removal of'these contaminates from the soils will be required by
the regulatory agency.. Remediation alternatives that could be utilized for the
site consist of but are not limited to the following:
1) Excavation and disposal: would ex~pedite remed/ation however, will be
~" ', hampered by the 'location of the building to the east. The soils to be
~:"'" "~ 'excavated are within the structural zone of influence for the buildings
'"" "~ '" foundation and the excavation may require shoring to avoid
~' undermining the structure.
'~'3)
Vapor ex'traction: should be applicable considering the coarse grain
nature of the soils, relatively high permeability and relatively limited
areal extent of contamination. However. %his method may be timely and
possibly not cost-effective due to the relatively small volume of
contaminated soil.
Bioremediation: may be viable; various technOlogies are available but
in-situ methods have a limited track record, and are subject to dela~m
in permit approval from regulatory agencies. '~
The feasibility of these ~rious alternatives should be studied to determine
the mo~t'cost effective and efficient means of remediation. :.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive of R.L.W. Equipment as itl
pertains to the property located at 315 Lake Street, Bakersfield, California.
.......................... · The --findings' knd '~ conclusions rendered 'in this report are opinions-based, on
I laboratory testing of soil samples collected' during this study. This report
!_ does not reflec~ subsurface variations which may exist between sampling points.
9
CommNo. ES-0207-BB1
These variations cannot be anticipated, nor could they be entirely accounted
-'3 for in-spite of exhaustive additional:--testing~.-~..All.work_has._.been~_perfQrmed;_in_.~.
'accordance with generally accepted practices in geotechnical/environmental
engineering,'engineering geology and h~irogeologY. · No'other warranty; either
ex~ress or implied, is made.
Thank you for this opportunity to have been of ser%'ice. If you have any
q{~esiions regarding this report or the information contained herein, contact
this office at your convenience.
Respectfully sh~nitted,
Michael K. Lane
Project Engineer
Robert Mohle, CEG # 1409
Vice President
i RLW EQUIPMENT ~ APPENd)IX A
SI~-"~Y CATERING
Comm No ES-0169-BB1
October 5, 1989
Boring Logs
'E r h SysLems EnvironmenL l, Inc.
BORING: B-1, DRILLING METHOD: 8-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER
PROdECT NAME: SPEEDY CATERING DRILLING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
PROdECT NUMBER: ES-169-BB1 DRILL: MELTON DRILLING TRUCK MOUNT
.--.:PROJECT LOCATION: 515 LAKE' ST~ BAKERSFIELD,CA LOGGED BY::.'MY-KE LANE .......
: / SAMPLE# ~ DATA
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REMARKS
SP non-cohesive, brown, SAND,
medium to fine, angular, firm extent of tank
5 to dense, poorly graded.- 5/G · S-1 I ND 1~ Humid excavation and
backfill approx.
11-1S feet beg.
10 10/ S-2~ I ND 4 Humid
1__5[ S~~t'~~~~~~:'" . SlslLT, firm t° dense' , 1Gstiff' It brown,VF SAND to 15/ S-S~ I ND 1G ~oist vFbedded layers ofnativeSANDS°ilS'and inter-siLT
~th minor clay and
- gravelS.
_ ML sl stiff, brown, ~ANDY ~ILT,
oooassional sm. gravels, minor 20/ S-4 I ND 2& ~oist
20 coarse sand and olay, firm. 21
/stiff, brown, SILT, minor vf
_ · ~oooassional gravels, mod. dilataney,'
, ~sl cementation, firm to hard.
~5 ,~L 24.5 S-5 I ND 40 ~oist
- I total depth of boring 25' / 25
' no ground water encountered
SAMPLE SYMBOLS: t SPLIT SPOON ~IL · CORE NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions is a
~-SHELBY THINWALL-'~'O''- GRAB .................. simpljfic_a~t!pn p_f_ao.t, ua!~c~onditions_encountered.
It applies at the location and time of drilling.
~ SPT Subsurfa¢~ conditions may differ at other
loo~tions and times.
'Earth Systems Environmental,. Inc.
BORING: 8- 2 ', DRI LLI NG METHOD: 8-1NCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER
PROJECT NAF1E: SPEEDY CATERING DRILLING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
PROJECT NUMBER: ES- 169-BB1 DRILL: MELTON DRILLING, TRUCK MOUNT
.pROJECT LOCATION: 315 LAKE _ST, BAKERSFIELD,CA LOGGED_.BY: MY__K_E _I.A. NE ................................
· I SAMPLE DATA
" " = REMARKS
~- ° I Z: I~ LITHOLOGY >
- 0 AC 6" AND BASE ~ATERIAL
HL ..... stiff~-reddish.brown io .brown.,. ....................... .................... ' .............................
CLAYEY ~ILT, rapid dilatanoy
~L . ,
-
~ minor fin~ ~nd, non-pl~fi~, $/6 0-1 I ~ 14 Humid
_ firm, mi~a~,ou,, ~1. iron oxid-
~tion ~tainin~. int~rb~dd~d
- of
- ~1. coloration ~han~, to ~r~ ,la~.
_ brown. 1~,~ ~tainin~.
1 0 lo/ s-2 I ND 18 Humid
_ 11
- clay siringers, v. stiff, plastic, stiff drilling
15 sw is/ s-~: m. ND 20 ~oist
non-cohesive, it. brown, SAND, 16 interbedded layers
- well graded, fine to coarse spherical VF SAND and SILT
- rounded grains, minor
_ small gravels, sl. dense, gravels.
21
25 24.5 S-) m ND 65 Hoist
- total depth of boring 25' /25
no ground water encountered
SAMPLE SYMBOLS: I SPLIT SPOON ilk CORE NOTE: This log of subsurfa6e conditions is a
....................................... ~ S_ HE. LBY...T_H!N.._y_A_LL_O_ ._O_RAB ........ simplification of actual conditions encountered.
SPT
It-applies'at the location-and time-of drilling; ......................
Subsurface conditions may differ at other
locations and times.
EarLh SysLerns EnvironmenLal, Inc.
BORING: B-~ DRILLING METHOD: 8-inch HOLLOW STEM AUGER
PROdECT NAME:SPEEDY CATERING DRILLING DATE:SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
PROdECT NUMBER:ES- 169- BB 1 DRI LLER:MELTON DRI LLI NG, TRUCK MOUNT
PROJECT LOCATION:~I S. LAKE. ST., BKFD, C.A ...;- LOGGED BY: MYKE LANE ................ -~_~ ....... . .... :..~--~-~
~1 SAMPLE DATA
~ o ~ LITHOLOGY ~ ~ ~ ~
,',' . ................ .'
-o SM ,....I
._ :. :.: sl. stiff, brown, SILTY SAND,_ ........ ~_: ~ [: .
.............. _ :1:::"' "' ' ..... fihe'to-med Sds'mod: dilatan'~ --: .......................... ~ ..... ' ~ ·
: :: ~: humid, firm.
- ~ , , no gasoline odor noted
- SP ~ non-cohesive, light brn,F. SAND, in backfilled material,
3 ~[~ silt, poorlggraded, humidto 5/6 S-I I ND 10 approx, ll-l~beg.
- moist, slightly dense to loose.
- SM ~[~ sl. stiff, gray bm, SILTY SAND distinct gasoline odor.
15- --- ':':' to SANDY SILT, minor gravels, 13/ S-S I so8
_ ML 1~:.'.1 rapid dilatancy, moist, firm. 16 interbedded sands,
20 ':':
_
'"' 25/
~ ".' S-5 I 271 40
__ i, ,, . 26
' :': ~tiff drilling
.:.: ~o/ s-~ I ~ ~2
~0 '. '. very firm ~o hard, well
,','
- ''" cemented with vein caliche.
SC
,,,,, stiff, brown, CLAYEY SAND,
- ~ minor oaliche and gravels,
35 '"" no apparent gasoline
~'"" reed grain, dense, humid. 35/ S-7 I 14 35 odor.
OONTINUED ~6'
B SPLIT SPOON A CORE NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions is a .
S AMPLE SYMBOLS :~_[~ .SHELBY_THIN W..ALL__O .~ GRAB .....~ ............ simplification of actual conditions encountered.
SPT
It'~pPli~t- th'~-16oatiOn"and' time of drilling~ ........................
Subsurface conditions may differ at other
locations and times.
'Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
BORING: B-5 (CONTINUED) DRILLING METHOD: 8-inch HOLLOW STEM AUGER
PROJECT NAME: SPEEDY CATERING DRILLING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 12989
PROJECT NUMBER:ES- 169-BB1 DRILLER: MELTON DRILLING, TRUCK MOUNT
RROJECT LOCATION: 31_5 LAKE ST,...BKFD,_CA ......... LOGGED BY:M_yKE LANE ................................
'"" SAMPLE DATA
#
~' ~0 ~ LITHOLO6¥ > ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REMARKS
...... brown~ CLAYEY SAND to ~S/ S-?i 1~ ~5.
-~"~' ...........,,,,,~ ....... SANDY CLAY~ humid.' '~'6 .............. ' ....
,,,,, ..... No apparent petroleum
,.,,,"'" odors. ~ .....
..... ~9.5 S-f:I 1.9
/~0
- total depth of boring 40", no
- ground water encountered.
50
55
60
70
.... _l .............. ................... ~_S._HELB_Y. ~H. INW_ALL -0
SAIMPLE SYMBOLS: I SPLIT SPOON ~l~ CORE NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions is a
simplification of actual conditions encountered.
GRAB ............ It applies at the location-and time of drilling.
ii SPT Subsurface conditions mau differ at other
locations and times.
"Earth Systems Environmental, Inc
BORING: B-4 DRILLING METHOD: 8-INCH HOLLOW STEM AUGER
PROJECT NAME: SPEEDY CATERING DRILLING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
PROJECT NUMBER: ES-169-BB1 DRILL: MELTON 'DRILLING TRUCK MOUNT
pROJECT LOCATION: :51 $ LAKE ST, BAKERSFIELD,CA LOGGED BY: MYKE_LANE ......
a~ SAMPLE DATA
~ ~ = REMARKS
AC 6" AND BASE MATERIAL
_ .. :. ~ Numid'
........ SM :"' ; ~u b~;; ~iL~ ...................... .................................
ML .I . . , SAND to SANDY SILT, medium to
.. .'...',. fine sand, minor cla~, rapid
.... . .... dilatancy, firm. ' '
" 5/6 si- I ND 6 H
. . umid
.. . ..... interbedded
- MH,,,,,~ stiff, gry brn, CLAYEY SILT to . clay.
_ ---,.,,,, .... SILTY CLAY, minor fine sand,
1 CL slow dilatancu, firm.
,,,,, ..... 10/~ S-2 ND 1i Humid
15 sw :;:::;:~:' is/ s-~ m ND
:;:[;::[~. - 4 Humid
:/::::::~ non-cohesive, lt. brown, SAND, 16
interbedded
- :7:::::~:' well graded, fine to coarse spherical
:7:::~::- . SILT, CLAY and
- ;7:::::::. . rounded grains, minor silt and GRAVELS.
:;:[[~[:' small gra~els~ loose to sl. dense.
- :;:~::~.
-
~;::::::' 20/ S-4 I ND 19 Moist
20 :;:~:::~:.
- :;:~7:~.
SM 11: zfiff, br~n, SILTY CLAY~ SAND
- -~ :~:: to SANDY CLAYEY SILT, rapid
::: '~ dilatancy, minor vein oaliche.
2~ ~[ '.',
:.] a 24.5 S-SI m ND 50 Moist
total depth of boring 25' /25
no ground water encountered .
SAMPLE SYMBOLS: I SPLIT SPOON Jl~ CORE NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions is a
I~ SHELBY THIN ~ALL-0- simplification of actual conditions encountered.
GRAB ...............
......................... ' ................. It applies at-the location and time of.drilling.
~m) SPT Subsurface conditions may differ at other
locations and times.
RLW EQUIPMENT APPENDIX B Corem No ES-0169'BB1
SPl~k~y CATERING ., October 5, 1989
Laboratory reports and Chain-of-Custocb'
May 1989 Tank Pulling Operation
~ ' ~:. '--~.-?.. · . .... ~,.
~..'~- .--.~.'::~ .. .. .- :~:
.! ~lld&~ '&Jll~' ~~i~L _. -, ~-,~ .'-..~,.',' ..-," . '.
~:' ~t~~ .- ~J.~K~.~~ ' '~:;~ .... " ': :' .'
'~'~ "~" ~ ~~m' '~'?~: '"' '"":":'""' ':'~":"'
~_~b,e .,.~: .~,. ~,-.. ,.. .-..' .. ':
..- .¥ ?.:.. -.... ... .
.----~"Equtpmn~ - [... ...''.. __~ '~.;'~. .".''~:~:~;.~..:.~).~.~.,',.;.~.:
~. _: ...... - . , ~ ',-..: . . . ..~. '~ '.' ....
- ~ ........ :'-P.O. Box 640
.... . ,.
· B~ker~ftald, Ca. 9330~ .i- . ~~-~ ~,... ~, :~.,,.~,',-.. . ... ·
.. . ~ . - . ......t~,.-~-~: , · ..... /.~.t';:,~' .... ...~ *.~..
__ t , · .' ' · ' ' '~' -~ ' - '.' ' ~ '-! ~' ~ · ~ '.':~ -.'-' .-
~ ~n~ton. 8~ ~ ~ . .- ~:.~',2:....: .. ,-~¥...?-......,.,...,,..~..
' ' . ' ' .' : , · -' ~ 'p "~':~i .' ' ', ~m. ~... .
. ~b ~,.- ~23-3 . - .. ,. ~,,. ..:..,....: ~?~,~ ,..:,~ .....,...... -.
'~-.:.-~.~. ~:~;.~_.~.~ .... : ...... ~ · . . ': - ~ -' '...~:~,~;' .' '. '. ".~-~ ' · .~ *-' '~. -":" ',' -
- . - : - _ .~-.'~t. ,' , ';q~';~-:~' ..,' . -~. ~,,~. ·
- ~ . ~ ~ ..'~'~ . ;' ~-~ ~ · . ~'~'~ ~ -..-. , ;;'.?~:., '.~ .. . . .~.¢.-'
- . - . . - . . . · . "..* ~ ~ ~. .., ] -~;'t:...). · ...
,... . ....
' -~v ~9 '" ' ''~''~1 .~v- ~ ' ' ' ' ~ ~1,~-~: ', '"''~'":" ..... '; "":~" ....
~ .... _ ..... ~ ..... ,..~ ,-,~ .... . .... .
. ,. ~. . .
: .. ·: ..~.. -. ,..:.:..:-- .,.,c; - ..~. , ~:f~,..-.~/~;~, ...,- ~,::,-~.- ~ ·
:... -.. . . . - .. ,i~..;- ~ ,~¢:: ~.'..-,-~,, .. ,?." .-.
..... · . . . ..... ......,,.., ....
. . . ¢. .... · ~. '~.::~.&- :~.-...; .,.=.;, ~ .
. . . . · ~ , , - ..; . . . .... . '...~[..- ~ ~.,.. ~ ~. ~..-, ..
. . .; :...........o.oz :..... ....
~ ~~''~ · ' ' ~ ' ~ ' ~,O~ ' ' ' '~ '""~:~ ~ --~ :' 4 '~'' ":" ' ;'' "" ''t:''
. ~~ . , .?: .. .. , .- .: ..., .~.~: -~.~':.,,~'~.~.~? :- -;-.~. ,.. .
· . " . . . ., -~.~'~'~.~ ~ .~'~'~ ""~:~'.. . ~;*' ~ '-
~~ . .- ~/ · . -'. . -~.~ .-,._.- 0.02. ,--. ....... .-~',
.
'.' ~~ . ' ~ '-~ .- .': 0.30 .~.,:~;~ 0.~ ~-.,-;,~:?:;.~-'":r '<,~..'.' ·
~ ~~ · ~ .- . ~ ~ .;. ~.~ · ...,~:.~ ...~.~ ~'~,~.~..., ,~ ...",?~',.
., -. . . . . ~ ~ . . . .... .*., . . . · . ~.,~ .,., , ,~ '..~ *..~. :........~ .-.~
...... . .. ~ ~, - ....~/..~ · , · ..~ ....... .
. . . . . . .: ..
. . .. . . .' ~.. · :~.'~.~ ...- . ~-'.~:;.;:.... ~. . ',~- ,
~ ~e~~ . ~.:~,~ ..... ,~.~.. ,.. ,~,..:...
.... . :. ~ ~.. . ,, .. . . '~, ~.~. · . :;.~ ,. ., , ., ;: .';¢5 .~
r ' ' " ' ' ' · ' '~ '4~ ' · ~.~'~ ~ -, · ' "'~' ~' -
, . ~,~'.~. ,t ? , .; ~,;.r"'; '
..." . ''' - .. · . · . '. rT, '.- '~'~..:. '~'¢.'.;~ .:%' · ~7-' '.'~' "-'
, ·
~ '~ ~: .~ ~= ~~ ~ ~.0.~.5. ~.U.;.~. zm~ ~, ',--. :-:~'::,;~:~.. ?'-. ~;~:~'-~'.,
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. '.¥; .; ..... .?~v:.~. · - &?.....:.
. . ,. . .....~ - . . .~..-. ......-; :..- . -,~..~...~..:.,.~ ,~ ~ ;,:'~ ..,~. . -
. ~1~· . . , .· .' . . .. . . ~'~ . . . . .. ~.e. -. ~ . .;~.,~:~,,. . ~'~ - . ~,~7.~_ ~ ~ ~-" ,.
· .:~. · . -. ,. -
i . - . ~- . .... :.,.' ~ .. ,.:-...~- ~.~v. ? -~..~......
~ . ,..~. . · ~ ,- , ~' · ,......~- ,~' ,, .... :. #., .-
. . ~~ ~.0.~,~.
. .. . . . . · . -.. ...- , .. ~., . ~- . .'.''. ~. ~-~ ~.-~,. ',¢- ~._... · .
.. .
~ - '?..~ '. ' .".:~.. · .-:'.'. ' '~, .,: .¥.. '". x::"[ ;~',~:. :~ r;' ·
.~. Y : ~ : .....~"'..'; ~.'" . " .","i ' ~ . '?~'.:.~ ;~':",~z~.~'..".??.:...
. . . . . . ~ . . , . . · ~ . , · ~..~ ~'~';~ .~' .~ .. ,
.. . .. . .' . . . ' -. . ~, ~; :. ,'.. :..' .~..
..... ?'. ~.~!~ ..... ' · ~ .'~; ~.~ ;'-.' '~,~,- ..'~.. ·
· . . . · .. . . .... · .. . ~ '..,~, :~-'.--'~',. -.~:~ ~;.
' ' ' '' ' - '
- .~ . ... · ... . · . . · ~ ~.'' y .--~; :~: ..- ~ . . .'. ~.. -
,,,-~' ~LA~ E~RATOFR~ES ~l-'lr. "'.- -"
~1'$~ .., ~. · · · .:
., .[ ~:~ ~ .-. --., : ~.J. ~u-.~. c~ ~. .- -. ..'.~
':-r . ' --- :" '. '~~.~.. ~~.{ ~~-~:~.~~..:~ ·
--' . ' · ' . ' ~ ~:,:.F" h (->- ' Y':,[?... : ' · - ~' ,'
~',~.
· . ..... - .". ~ -.~ - , .... .- ,'a~'~ :~.,'
7 At,ntt on. Bud ~ '~ ' .... · :. '. -" ~ ~. :.:--' ~-... ~ ~-..~ -.:." - .:..(,'~.: . :
. . ~ . _.. .. ..... . ,........ -~., ~ .~;'..:~ ..:~.~:.~..? ..~
,'~ , ~ : ; · . ' "' ..' . '.Z;'. '~ ~' ~' ~'; ~' ~.' '' ~ ~'
... ~.:. ~-¢ . ... . . ...?~ . .-:.?.?. -~f .'.
. , .~. . . .
. . · , - . . . . ~
, ~ .-... ...... ..~..,.,~.
~ ~ "?'' ' ~ ~ '"' " ~ ",-:-.": ~ '~'(h~?-. ~' ":'~"'
, '~' -~-~- ~.? ..b~.'~: .'.
32~89 ":.'. ~[~r~ "L' :'" , ..... -" .... '" '"., ·
. .... . .St~J,,"- · .
-.. - ~ :.., ·. , .. . . '-" .... .. ;: ;.., -...<,- '~,r~ .... .
;~~ '- ~~ '-.' . . '~"-~",,. -- .
'" ~_..~_,~.." ..
~ .... ,_...,.. -: ..,
. ... .,:;., .. ,~.:.'-.::'~
; .;~ .'. ; . :' . · .% :
.... ., .¢ ~ ~,..- ;, ..
Tol~ ~ .. ' ,5. ~B u.~ ".'~-.,..- ..... '"- '
. .. - _~ f'"f~ , .' . .... ..":
~~ · ~ 28.~ O.~.:' ...... ~.' - .~., ~..
.~ ..~'.~; · ..., . ......,:...... .
' ' . ~,'_ ~. ~.~..... ~-'; ~;~.~ .' ....; ."'" 4 ....
.. ~~ · .~i .. . ~¢.~ ~.~?-~; g..~
. . : ~ :* .-, · . ;*,'~ ~",~ : , . '~¢x .~.
- . . - . ~. ~ ' .,~% ~--~... · . ~....
T~n~ Te~~ '. ' '.';~ ~- "~'~ ....."'~":" ¢':"
~..~ t"~ :.- :.' ¢.-"
· ~ -~., ~.~.~.- ~ -, . -..~.
~-~ ~ ~o.~ ',~.:~. ~. ~,~...~......,. ~.,,.,.
. . . ff. ~ -T-,, - ~... ~.. - .
.~; :.:: -.,Cf.~..?. ~---:... . :'~.~ ..
,.. ~ -:~'~.' .. ~,.~
, ·. ..~ ~ ~ . ";~.~,:~
~~ ~ ~.0~.~. .U.~.T. m~ ..
.-.. ~ ..'. :....: . - ..:~,.....~. :..... ,.-~:.:,: '.~ g ' ..
;
,.,. ~ .
""l ~- ~'~' ' ";':":""' "'""::" "'"': "~'* '" '~'
' . ~.T,,Y~.,/,.
· ..... .... ...,:.... :..
~.~i ' ' ".' ".';.. '.'. :'. '"' :'-."-''~'~.~' ' ;,'" ~""'"',"' ':"~:~"~"~:.:- -~'. '
.'.- ' .? ~ ,.:
· ~, .~.... } ': ~. ;-~'~.-,. .-
.': .'~, "' ...... i . ~.L.:
'. ~o~ B 9.~.8. ~- ~ ' '" "' ':":'"' '"
..... "' ' ' ' ' ""::J" 'q '~M':' ~
· ..:. ... - .... . · . ..,,: ~..- .,.... '.~'~ ~.~.-,:.~'.~':
.. .. .. .... ... ,...,.. ......... . · ..'...~,,;~.
.....~ · : .." ;....,...:......:~: . : '"': ...... · ..,.~~'~~~ '"";';
IJ · ' ' · : ' " ' '";' ' ' ~ ,.,. · , .'.-...- .,i ~:-~.~. .
. '.Z ';' ' ~ :.-.-' '. ~'~ ~".' '..- ' . ": ." '-'-. '!' '~i. . ' :' ~ ~,~..~;t'.*
~ .. . . .,. .. · . · .. ,.. .. . . ....- ~ ,-. :.- ~ ~.. .... ..~,7~[.~.
~ . . ~ ..'..~' ...~ . .. ', .. . ... . · ,;, ~ ''~' ~.~...
. . ?'.- . ~, ,-. ,.,. ~: .',~. ~
......
· . :.; -; . ..', .
· ":"':'-
~. ~ , . " ,! t~"."~.';: .-.-.:.':"
· , .. -. . -¥ -i..': .
· : .. .'~ ]~-;::- ~
'" ......... - ..... ' ........................................ ~ .... - "~ --.. ~.r .:~ ,~:..i~/~..-' .,:: ...... -" L;;... -- '
- ....5.:~t¥..
SPh--.~ny CATERING
Corem No ES-O 16-92~il -~ ......
October 5~ 1989'
September 1989 Site Characterization Study
ENVIRONMENTAL
I " ' CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
I'" PETROLEUM
.ABO RATO RIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
................... ' ........................................ Bo:r~ing'"f @ 2o'
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
170-A Granada St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
Lab~ No.: 6994-1
Sample Desc: SES-0169-BB1 Speedy Catering
315 Lake St, Bakersfield, ~.CA
S4"'9/05/89 @ 9-.00-AM
'DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
· 05-Sep-89
Constituent
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Report: 07-Sep-89
PHONE 327-4911
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
o5-s~89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
07-Sept89
TEST METHOD:
Minimum
Reporting AnalySis Reporting
Units Results Level
ug/g none detected 0.02
ug/g none detected 0.02
ug/g none detected 0.02
ug/g 'none detected 0.02
ug/g none detected '0.02
ug/g none detected 0.02
5.00
ug/g none detected
TPH for'gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. ~r~thod.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020..
'Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHE¥1C4L 4#ALYSI$
PETROLEUM
170-A Granada St
I'i' San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
, Attention:
LABORATORIES, INC.
Lab: No.:
Sample Desc:
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
~argeable Aromatics
(F~) I L )
PHONE 327-4911
Report: 07-Sep-89
.......... "Boring` 2'-@' 20'-' S~'*-9705789' @' 10'~ 30"AM ................. ' ........ ' ....................... t- ............. ......
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
07-Sep-89
6994-2
~ES-0169-BB1 Speedy Catering
315 Lake St, Bakersfield, CA
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
05-Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
05-Sep-89
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Units Results Level
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
Constituent
0.02
0.02
0. O2
0.02
0.02
0.02
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
EthYl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
ug/g none detected 5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.~.F.T. ~t[~d.
Individual constituents by EPA 'method 8020,
Dry Matter Basis
California D,O.H.S, Cert. $102
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Earth Systems Environmental:
170-A Granada S%
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
pUrgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Report:
Lab. No.:
Sample Desc:
PHONE 327-4911
ll-SeP-89
6994-3
~ES-O169-~B1 Spccdy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
Boring 3 @ 20' S4 9/05/89 @ 11:30 AM
DATE ANALYSIS
07-Sep-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ [AB:
05-Sep-89
ti:. DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
i' ' 05-Sep-89
i., Constituent
Reporting
Level
Analysis
Results
ug/g 9.67 O. 02
ug/g 220.10 O. 02
ug/g 62. O0 O. 02
ug/g 92.20 O. 02
ug/g 216.04 O. 02
ug/g 133.54 O. 02
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Total Petroleum
3070.94
5.00
TEST METHOD:. TPH for gasoline by'D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T, method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020,
Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. #102
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
t ' PETROLEUM
,il ~ Z 5 1,989
I_ABO RATO F::II ES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
2323 E St
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: Myk~Lane
.... :Da't.:e :of
Report:
PHONE 327-4911
19-Sep-89
Lab, No.: 7256-1
ti "~ Sample Desc: RLW Equipment '
'B::~ring 3 ~ 25' S5' 9/05/89 @ 12: OOp
'_ DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
05-Sep-89 14-Sep-89 16-Sep-89
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Units Results Level
Constituent
Benzene ug/g 28.62 0.02
Toluene ug/g 457.29 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 113.38 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 159.27 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 369.20 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g 223.09 0.02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
5621.81 5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T.. method.
Individual constituents'by EPA method 8020.
Dry Mabter Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
ENVIRONI/ENTAL
CHE¥1CAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
170-A Granada St Report: ll-Sep-89
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
Lab"' No.: 6994-4
Sample Desc: SES-0169-~B1 Speedy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
............ . ......... Boring-.3-@~:.30 L ,S6_. 9/05/:89 ~@..12; 30 .PM .................
DATE SAMPLE · DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
COLT,R~TED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:
05-Sep-89 05-Sep-89 08-Sep-89
i.
Reporting . Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Minimm~
Reporting'
Level
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
~Xzlene ug/g
m-Xylene- ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Total Petroleum ..
Hydrocarbons ug/g
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
,none detected
none detected
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for g~soline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Co~nents:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
.ENVIRONMENTAL
[i
PETITOLEUB
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aroma%ics
(SOIL)
Ear{h-S~s~e~-Environmental ~ ': '~ ........ '~- -~ .................... Date~f ' ' '~i~-~"~ ~ ~:~:~'- ~-~ ~-::' :*-~-:? .....
170-A Granada St Report: ll,Sep-89
A%tention:
Lab, No.: 6994-5
Sample Desc: ~ES-O169-BB1 Speedy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
Boring 3 @ 35' S7 9/05/89 @ 12:45 PM
COLLECTED: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLETED:.
05-Sep-89 05-Sep-89 07-Sep-89
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units ' Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected O. 02
Toluene ug/g none detected O. 02
V.%hyl ~enzene ug~g none detected 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g none. detected ' O. 02
m-Xylene ug/g none detected O. 02
o-Xylene ug/g, none detected O. 02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g none detected 5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Com~nts:
California D.O.H.S. Cert' ff102
~/ ~' J. J ?Eglin ~ J~nalyst
£NVIRON¥~NTAL
CHemICAL ANALYSIS
PETFIOLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE'RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
170-A Granada St
San Luis Obispo, CA
Attention:
PHONE 327-4911
93406
Report:
Lab,No.:
Sample Desc:
ll-Sep-89
Boring 3 .@ 40' S8 9/05/89 @ 1:00 PM .
DATE SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DATE ANALYSIS
CO~: RECEIVED @ LAB: COMPLIED:
05-Sep-89 05-Sep-89 07-Sep-89
6994-6
SES-0169-BB1 Speedy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results '
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Total Petroleum
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
Minimum
Reporting
Level
0.02
0.02
O. 02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5.00
TEST METHOD:. TPH for gasoline 'by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
I' California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
ENVIRONlidENTAL
CHEt~ICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGMN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
' (,?~DIL)
i70-A Gra~da St Report: ll-Sep-89
San Luis Obi~Po, CA 93406
Attention: °
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6994-7
~ES-0169-BB1 S~cdy Catering 315 Lake St Bakersfield
_Boring 4 @ 20" S4 9/05/89 @ 2:30 PM
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
05-Sep-89
Reporting '
Constituent Units
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED. @ LAB:
05-Sep-89
Analysis
Results
DATE ANALYSIS
O3MPLETED:
07-Sep-89
Reporting
Level '
~enzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl ~enzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
ug/g none detected
5.00
TEST METHOD: .TPH for gas°line by D.O.H.$, L.u.F.T. m~thod.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020,
Dr~ Matter Basis
C~ifornia D,O.H. S, Cert. ff102
~J An~iyst ,
ENVIRONt~ENTAL
.... CH~I~ICAL ANALYSIS
· PETROL[U¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J.~J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA 93308
Quality Control Data
~ar~h~ Systems"' EnvirOnmental':''~-': .... ' ...... . --~ ~-:~.~:::~:n
170-A Granada St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Attention:
PHONE 327-4911
Analysis Date: 07-Sep-89
Sample Matrix: Soil
Units: ug/g
Quality Control
for LabNos: 6994-3, 6994-5, 6994-6, 6994-7,
One sample 'in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is
spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative
measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike
with a duplicate spike is a m~asure of the relative precision of the
analysis.
Conc. Conc.
in Spike. Added to Spike
Constituent Sample Spike % Rec
Dup
Spike Spike
%Rec RPD
Benzene 0.00 5.01 94.38 101.02 6.80
Toluene 0.00 5.03 101.41 104.60 3.10
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
0~00 5.09 88.89 95.86 7.55
0.00 5.02 91.00 98.99 8.41
0.00 5.11 93.48 101.16 7.89
0.00 5.03 91.65 102.17 10.86
TPH Gas 0.00 301.06 94.86 87.70 7.84 ·
QC Comments:
Spiked Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration
l~ % Recovery = X 100
(Concentration of Spike)
~ Spiked Sample Conc. - Spiked Duplicate Sampl.e .Conc.
I.. X 100
(Average Conc. of Spikes)
. ENWRONYENTAL
l,-il CHEI/IC4L.: AN4LYSIS
PETROLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
BTX/TPH GASOLINE
~-!ity Control Data
PHONE 327-4911
170-A Granada St
r- San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
.. Attention:
Analysis Date: 08-Sep-89
Sample Matrix: Soil
Units: ug/g
Quality Control
for Lab Nos: 6994~4
One sample in twenty is selected as a representative mtrix which is
spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative
measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike
with a duplicate spike is a measure of the relative precision of the
analysis.
' Conc. Conc. Dup
in Spike Added to Spike Spike Spike
Constituent Sample Spike % Rec % Rec RPD
Benzene 0.00
Toluene 0.00
Ethyl Benzene' 0.00
p-Xylene 0.00
m-Xylene 0.00.
o-Xylene 0.00
TPI-.I Gas 0,00
5.01 94.82 95.36 0.5?
5.03 101.23 101.43 0.20
5.09 94.23 93.76 0.50
5.02 97.50 96.42.. 1.11
5.11 99.97 99.14 0.83
5.03 99.26 :98,92' 0.34
301.06 103.50 98.43 5.02
Spiked Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration
% RecoverY = X 100
(Concentration of Spike) ·
.......................... RPD"(Relative~ Percent'-Difference) '
Spiked Sample Conc. - Spiked Duplicate Sample Cone.
X 100
(Average Conc. of Spikes)
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.,
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
BTX/TPH GASOLINE
Quality Control' Data
170-A Granada St Analysis Date: 07-Sep-89
' San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Sample Matrix: Soil
Attention: I'.Tt~: ug/g
.- Quality C~ntrol
for Lab Nos: 6994-1, 6994-2
i.'. One sample Lq twenty is selected as a representative .matrix which is
spiked. The percentage r~overy (% Rec) of the spike is a relative'
i'.' measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike
with a duplicate spike is a ~as,~re ~f the relative precision of the
-- analysis.
t C~nc. Conc. Dup
· in .Spike Added to Spike Spike Spike
Constituent S~mple Sp',Lke % Rec % Rec RFD
BenZene 0.00 5.01 98.96 86.40 1~. 55
Toluene 0.00 5.03 102.69 94.92 7.86
Ethyl Benzene 0.00 5.09 94.10 87.39 7.39
p-Xylene 0.00 "5.02 97.22 89.56 8.20
m-Xplene 0.00 5.11 99.31 91.99 7.65
o-Xylene 0.00 5.03 ' 99.96 90.63 9.79
TPH Gas 0.00 301.06 98.94 101.42 2.48
Spiked Sample COncentration - Sample COncentrati°n
% Recovery = X 100
(Concentration of Spike)
Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample Conc.
x.100
(Average Conc. of Spikes)
/[
~ [-~ CHE¥1C4L ANALY$/S
I
PETROLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
BTX/TFH GASOLINE ·
Quality Control Data
PHONE 327-4911
2323 E St Analysis Date: 16-Sep-89 i
Bakersfield, CA 93301 Sample Matrd~: Soil ~
Attention.: Myke Lane Units: ug/g ~
;-
Quality Control
'". for Lab Nos: 7256-1
One sample in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is
spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative
measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spike
with a duplicate spike is a measure of the relative precision of the
analysis.
Conc. Conc. Dup
in Spike Added to Spike Spike Spik~
Constituent Sample Spike . % Rec % Rec RPD
Benzene O. O0 5. O1 92.55 94. O1 r W 1 ' 57
Toluene O. O0 5.03 100.42 97.48 2.97
Ethyl Benzene O. O0 5.09 83.32 88.93 6.51
P-Xylene O. O0 5.02 88.21 91.79 3.98
m-Xylene O. O0 5. il 91.18 93.78 2.81
o-Xylene O. O0 5.03 , 89.05 94.10 5.51
TPH GAs O. O0 301.06 93.53 95.84 2.44
Spiked Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration
% Recovery = X 100
(Concentration of Spike)
RPD:- (Relative,. -Percent~Differen~e ),~
Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample Conc.
(Average Cz)nc. of Spikes)
X 100
Date Rec'& ~ 'i
Attn:
Sampler:
Name:.
Address:
Lab# Descripti°n:''~ E~-Ol~'Ct'' ~8~
BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Sample Type:
Water
Soil
Sludge
Oil
Other:
(specify)
Other Tests
NO. L- ],!9 ] ]
Analysis Requested:!.
q ZO' i
RelinqUished By:
Date:
Time: [- Received By:
Date:
Time:
Comments:
wMte: Return to Cmtomer wi~h ReFort~
yellow: BC Lab Copy ,~
Project No. i~?
Sampler: (Signature)
Sample No./Identification
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
linquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Report To:
White: Return to Customer with Repo~
Yellow: BC Lab Copy .,
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Project Location .-~~
............ :I ~/eS"
Field Logbook_No.
Chain of Custody Tape No.
Date
Time Lab No.
Date
Date
Date
Date
Bill To:
Time
Time
Time
Time
Received by: (Signature),
Received by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
(o ? 7q -- / f/x,,, -7
ANALYSES'
REMARKS
Total
Time
Date
Da~e
Time
Time
005
NO:
Client/Project Nome'
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Project Location
Project No. :i
Sampler: (Signature)
Sample No./Idehtification
Field Logbook No.
Chain of Custody Tape No.
Date Time Lab No.
ANALYSES
REMARKS
Total
Relinquished by/(Signature) ·
Relinquished by~ (Signature)
Relinquished b~: (Signature)
Date
Date
Date
Date
Bill To:
Time
Time
Time
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Re~ed by: (signat{~-e) -
Received .by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Date.
Date
Date
Time
Time
Time
NO:
Time
B.C.
White: Return to C',ustomcr with Rcpon-
Yellow: BC Lab COpy
Pink: Originator CgpY
I
4100 Pierce Rd.· Bakersfield, CA 93308 i':
- BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY _. ' i~ No.' L- iff [ 5
Client: ~ Sampler: '- Sample Type: ~ Analygis Requested:
Name Name: ,.~~ Soil .(specify') o o ~ .~ ~
Address.~~ U~ ~-'--~. Address: ""' ~ ~'
~ : Oth~rTes~ [~ o° q
~quish~ ~y: Date: Time: D~eceived By: Date: Time: C;mments: ~.
SPV~DY CATERING October 5, 1989
.............. . ..... ~ .................... . .......... TABLE-. 2-=!
LEACHING POTEt~IAL ANALYSIS FOR GASOLINE AND DIESEL
HAY 1989
I~;~~ Table 2-1
Leaching Potential Analysis for Gasoline and Diesel
. U~ing Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH)
and Benzene, Toluene, Xylene and Ethylbenzene (BTX&E)
The follOwing table was designed to permit estimating the
concentrations of TPH and BTX&E that can be left in place without
threatening ground water. Three levels of TPH and BTX&E
concentrations were derived (from modeling) for sites which fali into
categories of low, medium or high leaching potential. To use the
-i;::;~'~';~able,: find ~the appropriate'descripti°n-f°reach'°f'"~the~featu~es
Score each feature using the weighting system shown at the top of
each column. Sum the points for each column and total them. Match
t~ )oint to the allowable BTX&E and TPH levels.
~ S SCORE S SCORE S SCORE
~ '. SITE 'C 10 PTS C 9 PTS' C 5 PTS
O. IF CON- 0 IF CON- O IF CON-
FEATURE .... R ....... DITI ON ....... ' -~-R'-=: "DIT I ON ...... R-
E IS MET E IS MET E IS MET
2s-soX3_
Minimum Depth to >100 51-100
'Ground Water from the
Soil Sample (feet)
Fractures in subsurface None Unknown Present
(applies to foothills l ~)
:or mountain areas)
Average Annual <10 10-25 26-4
Precipitation (inches)
Man-made conduits which, None. Unknown Present
increase vertical
migration of leachate
Unique ~ite features: None ( At least More
one ~ than one
.recharge area, coarse
soil, nearby yells etc.
~ 41 - 48 pts 40pts or less
RANGE OF TOTAL POINTS _
Maximin AU WA LE 1150150/50' · 1.31 il
B/T/X/E LEVELS (PPM)
MAX mm ASOL Z 1000 XO0-
ALLOWABLE TPH --
T_.~V~ ?-~ (PPM) DIESEL 10000 1000 100
If depth is greater than 5 ft. and less .than 25 ft., score
' '0points.
'if d~pth-~-'5'ft.'or'-tess, this.table~hould-not-be used.~ ........... i .....................
If precipitation is over 40 inches, score 0.points.
Level~ for BTX&E are not applicable at a TPH concentration of
lOppm (gasoline) or 100ppm (diesel)
21
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
A Member of The Ear~ Systems Group
2323 E Street · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (805) 861-8020 · FAX (805) 324-2712
August 15, 1989
County of Kern
Environmental Health Services Department
2700 '~' Street, Suite 300
· Bakersfield, CA 93301
~ION NO,. ES-0169-BB1
B-20085-B06
OF~ FUEL TANK SITE. SP~T~
315 IAKE S~I~EST
BAt~/~'..:~ x~. CAT~ 93305
~Pexmit #: 140001
Thank you for your review of our proposed work plan for the above referenced
site dated July 31, 1989. This letter provides clarification to the points you
raised during our. recent telephone conversation.
SAMPLE BORINGS AND LOCATIONS
As to the runber Of borings specified, in our professional opinion we feel a
minimum of six borings will be necessary to properly delineate both the
vertical ,and lateral extent of contamination in .all direction surrounding the
tank. However per you ~equest, we will initially plan on drilling ~nly a
minimum of five borings at the revised proposed locations and 'order indicated
on the attached 'plot plan. Additional borings may be required based on
findings in the field during drilling.
As indicated in our proposal, all borings will be drilled to an estimated depth
of 25 feet. If contamination is present at a depth of 25 feet in any boring,
drilling will be continued, with client authorization, until no contamination
is detected in the field. 9/%us determining the vertical extent of
· contamination. Boring depths may be limited by the available equipment.
Undisturbed soil samples will be acquired by the method proposed at five .foot
intervals in all borings. Samples not initially analyzed will be kept in cold
storage pending laboratory test results and report approval.
2
ON-SITE STORAGE OF BORING SPOILS
Due to public access of th~ site, drill cuttings and soil sample, spoils will be .......
stored in DOT approved 55 gallon barrels in the on-site garage. :
IABORATORY~ANALYSIS OF SOILSAH~-~
A 'm/nim~ of two soil samples per boring will be sent to B.C. Laboratories.
However, depe_ndin~ on soil litholoc3y and field screening more samples may
Our Site Health and Safety Plan is attached.
All re~ed modifications and additions to our original proposal by the County
of Kern will requ/re prior app+-oval from E.S.E. 's client.
Hopefully these clarifications will adequately address your questions. Thank
you for your cooperation on this project.
Michael K. Lane
MKL: sjb ·
Attachments: - Revised Site PlOt Plan. - ESE Site Health and Safety Plan.
- BC Laboratories' Soil Test Results:
(Lab # 4223-4, 6' N. Side)
"~- ............ - ~ PROPOSED SI~' CHARACO('- ¥IoN PLAN
......... · SPEEDY CATERING
:315 LAKE STREET ' · ': ..... :-' : ........ :
:?'i ........... ~ ................. ~ .................... i ......... : REVISED ;8/16/89~--'L ............ f"-f--']--'~--?'---~ .......
PERMIT -# --14000t ............................ ] . : ............... ~ .... ' ; ':' ' : -.~--~_ L ........
.... : ........... ~_L.~_ _, ~ .... L ...... ;--d.-~ .....
: ' ' ~ .... -~ ....... ~ ~'--~'~---~ .... T--TTM' ~ ....... : -:-7 .............. ~ ~ ~: .... .... . : .... '.:..: ~ : , , . ;~ .
~ ·
~ ~ ti-- l[lll fill] ...... ~--:--~--t -il-~- ~ --~ SUPPORT AREA
~(- VACANT
ALLEY "'
· ~..
GARAGE :AREA'
................ P~POS~ ~Ig i~RIN~ ............... ~ ........ ,.-: ......................
-- ............. SCALE: I lll~lJ20'-(AL1Z DINENSIONS':'APPROX)' .................. -P~EP-~E-~': B~;:'~RTH' SYSTEMS ENVI~ONMEN-
? ................................................................ _~ ....................... .... : ....: ..... -:.. :._. _ =:.-::: -__.: -:_~-B^~.ERSFiELD__.T}A_~3L~0,~,..., .':
:~' ................................................................................. : .... : (8053 - 861'-8020 .............
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
.A Member of The EaCh Systems Group
2323 E Street · Bakersfield, California 93301 · (805) 861-8020 · FAX (805) 324-2712
2323 "E" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-8020
Federal OSHA Rec~i~ts
29-CFR 1910.120
T~e purpose of this plan is to assign responsibilities, establish personnel
protection standards and mandatory safety procedures, and provid~ for
emergencies that may arise while field operations are being oonducted at the
The provisions of the plan are mandatory for all on-site Earth Systems
Env/xc~m~cal, Inc. employees engaged in activities known to be or potentially
associated with the presence of hazardous materials. ~ese activities may
demobilization.
A copy of tb~ plan will be made av~]able to the client, his agents, all
rm~ediaticn operations. ~ plan has been prepared to address the activities
of Earth SyStem Environmental's employees and does not ~'~'~/, all other
· employers fi-om preparin~ a Site Health and Safety Plan for this project.
Project personnel involved in on-site investigations and remedia~ operations
are responsible for:
e
Taking all reasonable prehautions to prevent injury to themselves and
to their follow employees; and
Performing only those tasks that they 'believe they can do safely, and
immediately reporting any accidents and/or unsafe conditions, to the
client and the company safety officer.
Implementing the procedures set forth in the Health and Safety Plan,
ar~ reporting any deviations frum the procedures described in the Plan
to the client and to the ocmpany safety officer.
How old is this information? current as ~une 7, 1989
Physical description of facility vaunt oh,~,ercial property conskst.in~, of
. ~ six single-story buf]d~nqs. Previ~,.~!y used by a cat~wir~.
Site Status Vacant
Will client be on site? No
Work t/me limitations
St~cial site e~zy ~o~s
Da¥1iqht hours only
N/~
Warning for site excavation 3 blasts of vehicle horn
Ik'esence of hazardous materials.
C ]k~tanti~ [xx]cc:nfirm~
Is theexa~ location of hazardous materials:
C ]Kz~ CXX] ~sum~
[ ]~
Number of feet to nearest public right-of-way
Location of nearest tel~hone
Number of nearest telephone
Nearest public road Lake or Inyo Streets
Nearest water
Approximately 10 feet south
2
operations ~t be active participants in ESE E~Ri~ ~edic~l S~ll~e
Program. ESE's pr~jram ~s~ ~ployees ~igne~ to bmz~k~s w~te site
W~rk-Rest Schedule
A ~pply of poe~hle water will ~e kept available r~ar the site. .
Safety Trair~ ' '-
Field ~ ~-~t r~ceive a 4O hour .~asi¢ health and' safc~y training
designed to cc~p~y with the 0S~m/ZPA re~,~ements for hazardous waste
operations as promulgated_ by 29 CFR 1910.120 and attend a site-specific safety
the following:
1. A briefing on the work to ~e performed and the w~rk sc~s~dule
A ~i~ of th~ potential ch~l and R~ical ~ards ~at_~d__
with. the work to ~e performed
3. Haza~ identifi~ti~
4. Purpose-ar~-l~tati~ns of personal prot~ve equipment
Con~cts
Should any situati~ or u~pla~d occu~n~ r~
~_rvi~, the appr~pr~ata c~act fr~m the following ~h~lld be m~:
Bak~field Fire ~pt.
Bak~fi~d P~lice E~pt.
Kern-~M~i~l_~ Center_~
Environ. H~%lth ~vi~
911
9~
911
326~2667. ~
861-3636
4
Hazardous materials addressed in this assessment
~Z~lYI~IC~: The Eollowing chsmicals are ~titive: None
~he follow/rig materials potentially present at th/s project site are specified
bY-~California_Pmalth-and-Safety (~de 25249~5-as-recognized and oonfinmed-~-the .................
State of California as carcinogenic and/or mutagenic:
1. Vaporized gasoline ~ oc~2dzdng benzene
Potential Worker Hazards: With hydrocarJx~-basgd' fuels may result in dermal
irritation ~,9 to desiccation. Respiration of air laden with hl~lrocarb~
vapors may result in oxygen deficiency and/or macus membrane toxication.
Mixtures of air and hydzocaf0on fuels emhibit an explosive range th{m
.present/r~ an e~plosion hazard. Gasoline contains benzene, a' proven human
Tetraethyl I~ad:
Gasoline Fuel:
Overall Hazard Estimation: Low
0.075 mg/ '-
90O ppm/lO hours
(A.¢.G.I.H.)
Site Monitorinq Equi~t: Explos~, Photoionization meter
Conditions for ~ion of Operations: 50% of the lower explosive limit
(IR'w,). The ?Fr. of gasoline varies. · ~he Tmr, of octane is 1%.
Level of ~ion Planned: Level D Perscrsl Protection Equipment (PPE)
includes Coveralls, leather boots with steel toes and shanks, eye protection,
safety helmet and gloves.
Modification of this Site Safety Plan is permitted to Level C only.
Criteria for Alternative Level of Protection: Detection of > 10 ppm of unknown
gasses or vapors.
Level C PPE includes Tyvek suits, nitrile gloves and ~,hher boots, eye
protection, hard hat, and a half or full-face air-purifying respirator with
Scott 642-OA-H cartridge-filters or equi%-alent.
Instructions--'f°r' Disposal-~of Contaminated"Equlp~nt: "~- In- approved' containers. -
zones. However, care will be taken to avoid transportir~ contaminated soil to
uncontaminated areas. Additionally, all non-essential .vehicles and equipment
Symptoms of exposure include nausea, vomiting, dermatitis ar~ eye irritation.
If these or other unu~,~] symptoms occur while on-site, 'affected personnel
Organic vapor monitoring of the ambient a~r shall be ooz~uctsd at reasonable
intervals as detarmined by project personnel. ~he purpose of _~_~i_ 'toring is to
determine if vapor levels in t_he work area are high enough to warrant persc~
protection measures or evacuation of the site.
.Organic vapor .levels should be monitored using an 0VM photoi~zation meter
-with an .11.7 eV lamp (probe), calibrated to benzene. A combust/ble gms meter
will be available to verify the reading. Backqrcund should be det~wm~_~ by
~m,-~t be reoord_~d_. If any oont/nuous measur~nt that is 100 ppm over
ba~ is observed in the work area, respiratory protective action will be
required. Lesser protective measures are at the field geologist' s or
Before leaving the site\work area, personnel ~ust remove all protective
shall be observed before all work breaks.
Emergency COnditions are considered to exist if:
Any member of the, field crew is .involved in an aCCident, experi~
any adverse effects or symptoms of exposure while on-site; or
A condition is discov~ that suggests the existence of a situation
more hazardous than anticipated.
5
In the eVent of an On-site emergency, the procedures described below are to be
~mm~ atml_y followed:
event of a c~nication breakdown, i.e. radio malfunction or if radios are
not available, '~uddies" should use prearranged hand signals or other means
of emerge/Icy signals as follows.
* Hand gripping throat -'cut of air, can't breath!
* Grip partner's wrist or place both hands around wa/st -leave area
immediately, no debate! ....... : ........ ' ...................... - ........ ':"=~- .................................... ' ...... =' ~
* Hands on top of D~a~_ - need assistance!
* ~ down - no, nec3ative!
me
~he field engLneer or geologist will ese~hl~ emergency evacuation routes
and will ~ke all project personnel aware of these routes prior to the first
on-site activities. In the eVent of an emerge, selection another escape
4. In the eVent that any member of the field crew experiences any adverse
effects of symptoms of exposure wb~]e On site, the entire crew should
immediately halt work and follow the instructions provided the project
supervisor.
5. Wind indicators visible to all on-site personnel should be provided by the
project supervisor to indicate possible rcutes for upw/nd escape.
6. The discovery of any condition that would suggest the ex/sten=e of a
situation more hazard=us than anticipated_ should result in the evacuation of
the field team and re-evaluation of the hazard and .the leVel of protection
7. In the eVent an accident should occur, it will be necessary to Complete an
Accident Report Form with the Company Safety officer.
COntaminated or potentially COntaminated area of where the possibility for
the trar~fer of COntamination exists.
........................ puddles, _pools, mud, etc. Avoid, whenever possible, kneeling on the gruur~,
.................. ~-leaning 'or"~sitting' on' equipment ~-or-~grotu~;~'. ...... Do: not place ~'mcnitOring'~-
equipment on potentially contaminated surfaces (i.e., ground, etc.)
· 3. All field crew m~mbers should be alert to the presence of strong, irritating
or nauseating odors that could indicate a potentially dangerous situation.
Other senses should be kept .alert to possible hazards as well.
4. Precaution should be taken to p¥-event spillage. In the event a spillage
.................... ShoUld'-occurs--' the'-liquid 'mhould'~'-be--con~ ~ _~e~_ '-: ......................... ' ' ' -
'5. P£event splashing of the contaminated liquids.
Field cr~w members sb~] 1 be familiar with the ~hysical characteristics of
investigations, incb~ng the following:
*
*
*
*
*
*
~ot zone (areas of known of ~ contamination).
Site access. '
e
~n~m~zed but only to-the extend consistent with work-force re~~ of
safe site operations.
8. Safe drilling practices should be observed to avoid electzuCution, injuries, .
lost productivity and/or property damage due to above and unde~
* proper clothing (ie. well fitting
gloves, hard hat, and goggles).
* labeled shut-off/kill switches.
* clear work area.
clothes, proper leather footware,
identification of overhead hazards and maintaining a 20 foot min/m/m
clearance to electric transm/ssion lines.
* identification of und~ utilities.
* using, lock-out systam for electric shut-offs.
9. All wastes .generated durin~ Earth ~ Envir~r~e~fcal, Inc. and/or
~' .................. subcontractor activities at the .site are the responsibility, of:the client ........
7
sample site.
~ 2. At the sam~l~ site, samplir~ equipment shculd be cleaned after each
use.
4. The ~n/mm number of personnel necessary to achieve the objectives
shall be within 25 feet of the sampl~ activity.
e
If emergency and backup subcontractS_ personnel are at the site, they
should remain 25 feet fzum the samplin~ activity, where practical.
6. Exulusion zones W~]] be established if. necessary.
e
All unauthorized personnel will remain outside ex=lusion zones at all
~he Plan Acceptance Form (~ttached) should be filled out by all employees
work/rig on the site and retained in the job file.
Health & Safety Officer
Inc. Robert Mohle (805) 541-5983
M.K. 0~yke.) Lane (805) 323-4232 h~
(805) 861-8020 wk
Project-Site Safety Plan pr~ by Myke Lane, Health & Safety Officer.
Reviewed and approved by Robert Mohle, Vice President
Signature ~
The undersigned have read and understood the attached safety plan and agree to
comply with the provisions of this plan.
Name ~te Name ~te
Position Position
8
Name Date Name Date
Position Position
Nam~ Date Name
Name Dmte Name
Nam~ Dmte Namm
N~ ~ N~
: 34THI'0 ~ I ·
STA ·
· JBB SITE
&LU:~MY
COUN~
Ii
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
.SPEEDY CATERING
EMERGENCY ROUTE TO NEAREST
MEDICAL FACILITY
KERN MEDICAL CENTER
EMERGENCY PHONE: (805) 326-2667
PREPARED BY: EARTH SYSTEMS. ENVIRONMENTAL
· 2323 E STRI~ET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805) 861-8020
· ~,q~' ".~..':' ..
.. . .... .... ~ ~.. . .... .....~..., ,~,...
.... . . : - ~ . . .~ ,,,]~ ,
~~: " . . '. . . ~. _ , ~ ~.~.~..~..
· ..... ........ ..... .~ ..~ . .]..~' ..,' ... . .
......... . ...... ,. .. . . ....~,..,::,
.. ...- .. -~ ~j i~., ....
~ ................ . ................ . ;... . . . .-~2~..~..-?.'
J~ly 31, 1989
County of Kern
Environmental Health Services Depa~ '
2700 '~' Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield,. CA 93301 COMMISSION NO. ES-o169-BB1
.................................................................................................. : ................................................ ' ................ . ....B't20085~B06 ............. /
OF ~ FUH~ TANK SITE, Sl~n~%C CATk~IG
315 IAKE STREET
~~'m .:} r~, CAT.~, 93305
Pezmit #: 140001
We submit our proposed site characterization workplan for the above referenced
-~ite for your -~-eview and approval.
Currently, the site is vacant commercial Property consisting of six single
story garage/office buildings. The site is located south of ?~ke street
between Inyo and Alta Vista streets. Prior to foreclosure by Investor's Thrift
in 1988, the property was the local headquarters for Speedy Catering.
A 10,000 gallon ~nderground gasoline tank was installed prior to 1970 for
Storage ,and fueling of catering vehicles (refer to Site Plan). Information
regarding inventory monitoring, tank integrity testing, repairs to the tank or
piping, and past spills or leaks are not available. Elevated levels of
petroleum hydrocarbons were detected upon removal of the gasoline f~el tank,
conducted by R.L.W. Equipment in May, 1989. Refer to the attached B.C.
Laboratory test results f..o.r soil samples taken below the tank during removal.
The site surface areas are either covered by paving or concrete slabs, except
in the 10 by 50 foot tank excavation. The excavation has been backfilled with
firm silty sand. The surface grades appear to slope toward T~ke on the north
and the alley at the south property line.
Based on tb~ 'Water Supply Report, 1988" and discussions with Ken Turner of the
K~rn County Water Agency, the depth to ground water is anticipated to bez 1~5-
13~5 feet with a regional gradient toward the west-northwest. However, depth to
ground water at the site may be different considering the proximity of ~the
unlined channel ~ parallel to and on the north side of Lake Street.
2323 E STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805) 324-4791
FAX (805) 324-2712
315 IAKE ST-~EST
2
ES-0169-BB1
B-20085-B06
JULY 31, 1989
laboratory, analysis of soil samples, and a report of the findings. Ail site
set forth in CCR Title 23, the L.U.F.T. field manual (SWRCB, 1989), as well as
applicable County of Kern regulations. We therefore propose the following
scope of work:
~EALTH AND SAFSTY PLAN PREPARATION
In accordance with Federal OSHA Rule 1910.120, a site safety plan will be
prepared to protect cur workers at the site. ~e presence of' hazardous
materials at the site w~s ~ during the previous tank abar~___~. Ail
our field personnel have been'certified for hazardous materials work in
accordance with OSHA requirements. The Site Safety Plan establishes personnel
response measures. All personnel ~working on the site will be re~,~ed to read,
u~derstand and sign the plan.
Six soil test borings will be drilled sur~ the area of previously
identified centrum/nation at the site using an 8-inch diameter hollow-stem auger
~rig. One boring will be drilled in the former tank. location' which has since
been backfilled. · The remaining five'borings will be drilled surrounding the
first boring. Refer to the attached site plan for tentative .boring locations.
All borings will be drilled to an estimated depth of 25 feet below grade or to
.~the .first ground-water surface, "if encountered, whichever is less. If
contamination is present at a depth of 25 feet in any of the hot/rigs, drilling
can be continued, at your request, in order to fully determine the vertical
extent .of the cormamination.
Investigation of grcun water beneath the site is not proposed at th/s t/me.
U~listurbed soil samples will be collected from each boring a~ 5 foot-/ntervals
of dePth and held for laboratory analysis. These samples will be collected
using a modified California split-spoon sampler (2.5 inch OD) equipped with
stainless steel liners. The sampler will be driven beyond the auger bit using
a 140 lb. hammer (30 inch drop). Blow counts will be noted on the boring logs.
Ail equipment will be cleansed with TSP and rinsed with deionized Water before'
use, between sample intervals and between borings. Ail auger flights/drill
bits will be steam cleaned prior to use and between borings.
............................. placed'~[on~-ic~-fO~-~i~'~-'--a'''- Callf6~ni&-'-~_r~ifie~.-"-Iaboratory, -6bservir~
WORKPLAN PROPOSAL
315 LAKE STREET
ES-0169-BB1
BT20085-B06
JULY31, 1989
!
~. ............... _ ....... ~po~s~ ~_~1 ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~~wi~ pl~c ~~. --~ ............................ ~-~:~ ..... ~
A ~ifi~ g~l~ or ~~ ~1 ~ ~i~ ~ 1~ ~ ~r~, ~r
~s ~ ~1~ for~la~e ~~ (~ a ~), ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ sl~ ~~ ~~ ~ay ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~.
Soil samples collected during drilling will be sent to BC Laboratories, a
state-certified laboratory for chemical analysis. Based on field observations,
two soil samples ~-om each boring will be selected for laboratory apa~ysis.
All of the soil samples will be analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydmxx~ag~ (TPH)
as gasoline by D.O.H.S. (L.U.F.T. Method) and for BTX&E by EPA Method 8020.
Th/s task includes data compilation, interpretation of bor~hole logs, and
review of analytical r~sults. A brief report summarizing the results of the.
initial site investigation will be prepared and signed by a California
Registered Geologist. ~he report will include a site map, findings,
conclusions and rec~,,~_ndations as well as copies of boring logs and laboratory
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. If you have any ~e~_~ticns
or ~-evisions please contact us at (805) 861-8020-or write this office at your
Michael K. Lane
Project Engineer
Robert Mohle, CEG # 1409
Vice President
MKL: sjb
Attachments: - BC Laboratories Test Resul.ts .-
- Site Plot Plan.
.......... ~_ESE.Statement of Qualifications.
0.30
4.~
, _.. ................. · · , .... :-.....;-:.::...'., ,:' ...
~W Equip~nt I. : '... ' '~;'~t .. ';:~::~. '-:: .,: .... .
P.O. Box 640 · '1'
' ' · ' I · · ',. ~:,'~1'; '.'.' ~"~ .... .-' '.' *'?:' ," '
· . ..... ~ . . ,.. ...~,, ~. . .',...}, ,:,..~ -, ..~,; -.: ,.....
· · ' . ' · .
~b ~.: · ~23-3 - ' · .' '.'~ ~'.. .'. X ' '::.:'~?-/, C' , ;t~}:'-'?..'
' .
~.~. S~ ~~ 315 ~ S~ ' ~.'~.., "' ,'";,..; ::.;.'.~ .".':; '. ..
: , ' ,. .' , -. . '. ' ;..:a.;,.' . · .'-q-,V~-': ':... ".',":-'""' · -
. ., . . .~ , .. ~ - .- . .... i~ ;~;:~-' ... -~,;.¥ '~ ' .., ,.' '.~y.':.,.'~ :/.. .
, ., .. · · ' .... -a;-.'.~'. , ' ' '[ y.~c, .,f.:z~';-':: "--;"".t ', ,, ..
.... · . · .. ~ , .t , . ..: ,,..., .. . . .-,.~
..... ~.: ... . ~ . ~~ · . .~ ........ . ..... . ....
' · ~, · .~.,~ · '~~ r.~ ~ .~.~~ .... .';, ,~l': '," I ',x';'.~' - ;'.
- --~--'~' - ";~ ".. ~iV~ ~l ~~' '~ ~ *"' I g-.~.'" · ' ":'"'C~'' "
· . .... ,,. , · W . . · ~~_ f, · .- , ~ - .. ~:...:..: -,
~1 -
'" ' ~ '"' · '" ;' ':.':~:" '".J'" )' ' ~' q ~' .'.%.~ ::~.'"'"' "-2:.. ' '
'- ' ' ' : ' ' ' '- .',;2 ": -'.; fl. . - ~ ,~ir. '.~-
' __ .... . ~ -' ~ .'?,~ "-.~'! ~.~ ....,~.;, ' ;'.. -
': __ . '~. '. ': - ~lya~l ', . l~~ ~:~ ~''{r':' :.},.::. ::, ~,. ' -
' ~~ " ·
. ..~. .,, . ~~ . . ..~. -j[~ f ~'~. ., . .. ?. ~ ·
., . · , . .. . . ,..'.. .'... ::' . .. --:- , . ,.. = .,~ , - .. .. ~}./,' .:':.'.~
' · . ' . ·
: ~ .'.. '. :, ......:. ,0.01 :.:.. .... . 0.~ ,:/'"..'.'}~ ..'"} -
.... . .... j.~...? ..
;%
' ' -.'., ' ~ ~:~:' I "· '":~D..':' ' ~ "",..'
. ' .' ~::'¢.2~ '~.. ~...'~'~ ', .' ,. ,' .
.......... ~ * · ~ .~ ; ~..,.~... ,- .~ .~ . .,..* .., .~ ,
-'~., .,... ~
Earth Systems E
A Member of'The Eadh Systems Group
nvironmental, Inc.
'1'70-A Granada Drive · San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 · (805) 541-5983 · FAX (805) 544-0531
TERMS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES
1.1 The agreement between the-parties consists of these terms, the
attached proposal and any exhibit's or attachments noted in the
proposal. Together these elements will constitute the entire
agreement superseding any and all prior negotiations,
correspondence, or agreementseither written or oral. Any changes to
this agreement must be mutually agreed to in wdting.
SECTION 2: STANDARD OF CARE
2.1
2.2
The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those
· observed at locations where borings, surveys, or explorations are
made, and that site conditions may change with .time. Data,
interpretations, and recommendations by Earth Systems
Environmental, (hereinafter referred to as ESE) will be based solely
on information available to the consUltant. ESE will. not be
responsible for other parties' interpretations or use of the information
developed.
Services performed' by ESE'under this agreement are expected by
the Client to be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of
care and skill ordinarily, exercised by' members of the environmental
consulting profession practicing contemporaneously under similar
conditions in the locality of the project. No other warranty, expressed
.or implied, is made,
SECTION 3: SITE ACCESS AND SITE CONDITIONS
3.1
3.2
Client will grant or obtain free access to the site for all eqUipment and
personnel necessary for ESE to. perform the work set forth in this
agreement. The client will notify any and all possessors of the project
site that client has granted ESE free access to the site. ESE Will take
reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but it is
understood by client that, in the normal course of work, some damage
may occur and the correction of such damage is not part of this
agreement unless so specified in the proposal.
The client is responsible for the accuracy of 'locations for all
subterranean structures and utilities. ESE will take reasonable
precautions to avoid known subterranean structures, and the client
waives any claim against ESE, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and
........ hold-ESE-"harml~sS "~f¢5'm"~.r~ blaim'-(si'--liability '-for--injury-~or- loss;
including costs of defense, arising from damage done to
'subterranean structures and utilities not identified or ,accurately
located. In addition, client_._agrees to compensate ESE for any time
spent or expenses incurred by ESE in defense of any such claim with
compensation to be based upon ESE's prevailing fee schedule and
expense reimbursement policy.
SECTION 4: SAMPLE DISPOSAL
4.1 ESE will dispose of all remaining'soil and rock samples 60 days after
submiSsion of report covering those samples. Further storage or
transfer of samples can be made at client's expense upon client's
prior written request.
SECTION 5: BILLING AND PAYMENT
5.1
Client will pay ESE the lump sum amount indicated in the proposal or,
if no lump sum amount is indicated, in accordance with the schedule
of personnel and equipment charges, as shown in the proposal and
'.its attachments. Prior to initiation of fieldwork, a retainer as specified
in the proposal, is required. Invoices for the balance will be submitted
to client by ESE, and will be due and payable upon presentation. If
client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, client will so notify
ESE in writing within fourteen (14) calendar days of the invoice date,
identify the cause of disagreement, and pay when due that portion of
the invoice not in dispute. The parties will immediately make every
effort to settle the disputed portion of the invoice. In the absence of
written notification described above; the balance as stated on the
invoice will be paid.
5.2
Invoices are delinquent if paYment has not been received within thirty
(30) days'from date' of invoice. Client will pay anadditional charge of
1 1/2 (1.5) percent per month (or the maximum percentage hllowed by ·
law, whichever is lower) on any delinquent amount, excepting any
portion of the invoiced amount in dispute and resolved in favor of
client. Payment thereafter will first be applied to accrued interest and
then to the principal unpaid' amount. All time spent and expenses
incurred (including any attorney's fees) in connection with collection
of any delinquent amount will be paid by the client to ESE per ESE's
current fee schedule. ·In the event client fails to pay ESE within sixty
(60) days after invoices are rendered, client agrees that ESE will have
the fight to consider the failure to pay the ESE's invoice as a breach.
of this agreement.
SECTION 6: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
6.1 All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data,
............................... ~__calculations,_ estimates,._.and ..other.._documentsp. repa[ed~by ~ESE as
instruments of service, shall remain the property of ESE.
6.2 Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the client or
his agents, which is not paid for, will be returned upon demand and
will not be used by the client or others for any purpose whatsoever.
6.3 ESE will retain all pertinent records relating to the services performed
for a period of five years following submission of the report, dudng
which pedod the records will be made available to the client at ali
reasonable times.
SECTION 7: INSURANCE
7.1 '~ESE re~present~and~warrants~th~a~t`-it.~`an;c~it$~gents~st-~``ar~(~ .....
consultants employed by it is and are protected by worker, s
compensation insurance and that ESE has such coverage under
public liability and property damage insurance policies which ESE
deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance
shall be provided to client upon request in wdting. Within the limits
and conditions of such insurance, ESE agrees to indemnify and save
client harmless from and against any loss, damage, or liability adsing
from any negligent acts by ESE, its. agents, staff, and consultants
employed by it. ESE shall not be responsible for any loss, damage
or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions 'of such
insurance. ESE shall not be responsible for any loss, damage, or
liability arising .from any acts by client, its agents, staff, and other
consultants employed by it.
SECTION.8: TERMINATION
8.1
This agreement may be terminated by either party seven (7) days
after written notice in the event of any breach of any provision of thiS
agreement or in the event of substantial failure of pedormance by the
other party, or if the client suspends the work for more than three (3)
months. In the event of termination, ESE will be .paid for services
pedormed pdor to the date of termination plus reasonable termination
expenses, including the cost of completing analyses, records and
report necessary to document job status at the time of termination..-
SECTION 9: RISK ALLOCATION
9.1 There are a vadety of risks which potentially affect ESE by virtue of
entedng into an agreement t° perform professional services on the
client's behalf. In order for the client to obtain the benefit of a fee
which includes a lesser allowance for dealing with ESE's risks, the
client agrees to limit ESE's liability to the client and to all other parties
for claims adsing out of ESE's performance of the services described
in this agreement. The total aggregate liability of ESE will not exceed
$50,000 for professional acts, errors or omissions, and the client
agrees to. indemnify ESE for all liabilities in excess of the monetary
SECTION 10: DISCOVERY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS '
10.1 The client recognizes that the discovery of hazardous materials may
,,necessitate immediate protective measures to safeguard the public
health and safety and agrees to compensate ESE for measures that
in our professional opinion are justified to preserve and protect the
...... ' - ....... ' ..... health and safety-of site persohnel ~nd the publiC.' ............................................. ~ ....................... .
10.2
10.3
ESE agrees'to notify client as soon as practically possible should
hazardous materials be encountered at the site that pose a threat to
human .health, safety 'and the environment. Client agrees that the
discovery of hazardous materials at the site must legally be reported
to the proper authorities as required by CAC Title 23, Chapter 3, State
AB 2185, and Proposition 65. Client agrees to ~make the required
report at the recommendation of ESE or, if unable to do so, authorizes
ESE to make this report. Client also agrees to inform the property
owner in the event that hazardous materials are encountered, at the
site.
Client recognizes that the discovery of hazardous materials at the site
may adversely affect the property's value and may cause the property
owner to institute legal action against the client and/or ESE. Client
waives any claim against, and agrees to defend, indemnify and save
ESE harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from
the discovery of hazardous materials at the site. Client also agrees to'
adequately compensate ESE for. any time spent and expenses
incurred in defense of any such claim.
SECTION 11' DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
11.1
SECTION 12:
Contaminated ddll cuttings, sample spoils, and wash water may_be
produced as a result of encountering hazardous materials at the site.
Such materials will be properly contained, labeled, and stored onsite
by ESE.' It is the client's responsibility for the proper transportation
and disposal of such hazardous'materials.
FAILURE TO ENCOUNTER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
12.1 It is possible that exploration activities may fail to detect the presence
of hazardous materials at sites where'such materials are assumed or
............................................ ' ......... expected to.--exists-- ...... Client"'understands"~that-failure---to---discover
hazardous materials through appropriate and mutually agreed-upon
exploration techniques does not guarantee that hazardous materials
-- do not exist at the site.. Similarly, a site that is actually free of
contamination at the time of exploration may become contaminated at
some later time. Client waives any claim against, and agrees to
defend, indemnify and save ESE"harmless-fromany'claim-or. liabilityr
for injury or loss which may arise from failure to detect the presence of
hazardous materials through techniques commonly employed for that
· purpose; Client also agrees.to adequately compensate ESE for any
time spent and expenses incurred in defense of any such claim.
SECTION 13: AQUIFER CONTAMINATION
composition of a site's subsurface even after conducting a
comprehensive exploratory program. As a result, there is a dsk that
drilling and sampling may result in contamination of certain
subsurface areas, as when a bodng passes through a contaminated
zone, connecting it to one or more aquifers not previously
contaminated and capable of spreading contamination.
13.2
Although ESE will take all reasonable 'precautions to avoid such an·
occurrence, client waives any claim against, and agrees to defend,
indemnify and save ESE harmless from any claim or liability for injury
or loss which may arise as a result of cross-contamination c~used by
drilling, sampling, or monitoring well installation. Client also agrees
to adequately compensate ESE for any time spent 'and expenses
incu°rred in defense of any such claim;
SECTION 14: DISPUTES RESOLUTION.
14.1
14.2
All claims, dispUteS, and ·other matters in controversy between ESE
and client adsing out of or in any way related to this agreement will be
submitted to "alternative dispute'resolution" (ADR) such as mediation
and/or arbitration,, before and as a condition precedent to other
remedies provided by law. If and to the extent client and ESE have
agreed on methods for resolving such disputes, then such methods
will be set forth in the "Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement"
which, if attached, is incorporated and made a part of this agreement.
If a dispute at law related to the services provided under this
agreement and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as
provided above, then:
(1)
the claim· will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the
court of the county where ESE's principal place of business is
located and client waives the right to remove the action to,any ·
other'County or jucJicial iuri~di~ion;--~.'n~i:,
(2)
SECTION 15:
the prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable
costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorney's fees,
and other claim related expenses.
ASSIGNS
15.1
Neither the client nor ESE may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his
duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the
other party.
..The contractual_agreemeo, t.betweenthe client and ESE shall pertain
only to the benefit of the parties hereto, and no third party shall have
any rights hereunder.
SECTION 16: GOVERNING LAWAND SURVIVAL
16.1 The law of the State of California will govern the validity of these
terms, their interpretation and performance.
16.2
If any of the provisions contained in this agreement are held illegal,
invalid,' or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining.
provisions will not be impaired. Limitations of liability and indemnities
will survive termination of this agreement for any cause.
it
COUNTY OF
ei~-uv,ronmental Health Services DePOnent
Mr. Joe Zumwalt
Invester's Thrift
2602 "F" Street
Bakersfield. CA 98301
SUBJECT: Location: 315 Lake St.
Bakersfield. CA 93305
Known As:
PERMIT
Dear Mr. Joe Zumwalt:
.Speedy Cater~
14OO01
This letter is an official notice 'to inform you that the property described above
has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of an
unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an'underground storage tank. This
notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a responsible party
fop this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work'relating to the
above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California
Heaith and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 require
a determination of the threat to the environment as a result of this release. THE
RESPONSIBLE- PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CHARACTERIZATION.,
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S
REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find attachment
"A". Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum required site workplan activities, the
necessary requirements for selecting environmental contractors quaiified to perform
this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrations, and a 'section discussing the
answers to commonly asked questions.
The cost incurred by Kern County EnvirOnmental Health for the oversight df the work
for'the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site
remediation, and ongoing monitoring is,not covered by any fees or permits. These costs
are recovered by Kern county Environmental Health in one of the two ways described
below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under
the terms of 'the {A) State contract or {B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These
options ONLY pertain to costs associated'with oversight.
(A) STATE CONTRACT
.... ~ .... FOe-State Leaking Underground Storage 'Tank Pilot-Program-.~provides aP mechanism.£or
th~ State to ~'etmburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the
necessary oversight.and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State
contract. The..State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs
incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
(B)
COUNTY LOCAL A6REENE~
Kern County Environmental Health is providing this option for those wh° prefer to
pay the county directly and avoid the addition of State costs. Prior to the Countf's
......... performance of services, this'Op¥ion requires Your-deposit of $1,000.00 (one.thousand
dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for
County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party
must' enter into a County agreement, attachment 'B".
· To Safeguard the environment, the environmental sensitivity (Attachment 'C") of this
site has been reviewed by Environmenta.l Health to determine the potential threat for
groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive
.... may-enroll in'the' LocaI'0ptiOn Agreement~-"Th~-'site~described~-above
environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Optidn Agreement;'
however, the County of Kern reserves the .right to cancel any Local Option Agreement,
should it be discovered that groundwater, contamination or a~unique, comple~
hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the
State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this
right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive
area.
It is necessary for you to respond in writing within ten .(10) calendar days of
receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health o.f your choice:
either the State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the
County's Local Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure 'B", and return
it with your check fOr $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars} made payable to the County of
Kern, addressed to Kernj County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300,
Bakersfield,' CA 9330~, Attention:. Underground Storage Tan~ Contract Administrator.
If you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made'this selection
and that you have read attachment "D",.the'official. notification, in a letter sent to
the address indicated above.
Failure to respond in writing to this notice withln ten (10) calendar days will
automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under
the terms of ~he State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Enclosure
'O" wil~ then serve ~s the official notification of your enrollment into the State
Pilot Program for Underground Storage Tanks.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Richard
Casagrande Progra~ ~anager, at (805) 861-3636. '-
Sincerely,
Steve McCalley, Director
Environmental Health Services Department
...................... attachments
COUNTY OF KERN
Mr. Joe Zumwalt
ATTACHMENT "D"
June 29. 1989
Invester's Thrift
26o2-"F"'-$tre~t ......................................................................................................... =-- '"-'~- .............. '-----:-'-:-'
Bakersfield. CA 93301
SUBJECT:
Location: 315 Lake St.
Bakersfield. CA 93305'
Known As: Speedy Catering
PERMIT #: 140001
Dear Mr. Joe Zumwalt:
Thi,s letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (101 calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state' agency administrative and oversight costs
associated 'with the cleanup of releases from underground storage ganks: and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part. from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund: and
Whereas the above individual{s) or entity(leS) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site: YOU AP~ HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect cost§ incurred by any and all state and local agencies
~hile overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, aah the above
Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Richard
Casagrande. Program Manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
attachments
Steve McCalley, Director
Ehvi¥Onmental-Heatth Services Depa'ftmefit ...................
· ,, oreo eldel Failure to do this will prevent thin
/ I_ v-"'"'/,"~ /.. ~ :~.' ..- i I ~~,.';.",",.".J?.".'?-I-d?-v-°-"- ..... m lO ConaultpObii~&att 1' '.
/ r) ~ v ~ / ~ ~: -'::. t~ I ~onal fees_the, f?llOWln_~, u~.,v,~w,. ...... flab . · . - I '
~ :1 .... ~ ~-.-------~'~1 ~"'.'-," 13~ul If] 1'"2 /_(/~,...i~. II/,< I '
, '_t ..... ,-,~,,'~ °~"]/ ~ :~ :, I /'~~ I , ' IU/" J '3 / - '7'-'~/' ; "'~"
t ,,. ~(]pn ~! '-'-~1 ~.-' ~ :' r~ . , ,~ . .,., · ./ ' '-- I
~ ."':_";L~ ~ ~::-'! :.. ~ A, t 'n I/1",4 :C:l ~,~ / ' I~,,,~.o~mpx=,-oL. dd,..-. I ' '
~ } '.: ~;, ~ t ,r nd '
"~' ' !it;''''ti- I~'.- , .....' ' ~ ~~,~~~.' I
( 'i-'::,,i I :'?-'- ' "-/./// uul, "'~,,_..1~_ ____--
~d.,ITO/)AOTIVE · INDUSTRIAL · PETROLEUM
2080 5OUTH UNIQN:AVENUE~BAK E R S FIE LD, CALIFORNIA
June 9, 1989
,. uN ! 9_ 1989
County Of Kern
Health Dept.
Attention: Laurel Funk
Attached Please find copies of the
soil sample documentation from BC'
Laboratories for Speedy Catering,
3i6 Lake Street.
If you have any questions, or need
additional information, please give
me a call at (805) 83~-1100.
Sincerely, .
Servic~ Manager
RLW EQUIPMENT
BMN/lt
RLWEquipment
P.O. Box 640
LABORATOR I C'~C,.' ....
J. J. EGLtN. eEG. CHEM. GNGII. ','
· 4100 PIERCE RI3., BAKEIISFIELD, CALtr. oI~NiA 9330~ PHONE 327-491.1:
Bakersfield, Ca. 93302
Attention: Bud McNabb
Lab No.:
~mple Desc:
DATE
COi~Eu~TED:
31-May-89
RECEIVED ~ LA]3:
31
~on~tit~ent
0O2
_.__ :.:., .. : ....
...., J]:[:l[', .... .. :-','"?'.>?':1'"
· .~:*.:::L., :* ;., ',-- "i[;L,[: ,'
Be. ~nzene
Toluene
Ethy.L Be.n~ e. ne u~'g
p-Y. vlene ug,/g
m-Xylene ugjg
0.07
4.14
8.49
· 32.34
'~.61
~3~. 64
To~l Petroleum
0.02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
5.00
Tt~T Pfk"THOD: ~ for g~ol£r,te
Indi'~id,zal constituent,'.-; b:.' EPA ,~thod 8020.
.;:. ·
Ca!iforni~ D.O.H.S. Cert..102
JUN'-I(~' 1989 :' ''~'
Envifmm'mntal He~th Div. '.
~arn Couaty He~tth Deot
To!u~e
.E%b~l B~ ?nmer, e
.m-X~lene
To?_~ ~ per~ole~r,
· Reporttr~
".. Bnits
u~/g n~e ,-~e%ected
ug/g none d¢~ected
ug/g nc~e desired
u~/g : . O. 04
ug/g O. 10
TE~T Mk~HOD: TFH for ~ol~le by D,O.H.$. L.U.F.T. merci. ''.'
individual cor~t~ent.~ by ~A me~:~ 8020, .i::.,:'"i.
Dm-/ Piat~er Basis --' ·
California' D, O.H:$. Gert.'
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
.j, j.' £g!n.: .........
'LABORATORIES, Inc.
~geable Arr_~m~ica '
To~ Pet~l~ . <:< -
~n~ f · :r,.- ,.... . : '- :-..:.'-.":.::--- ~- .
- :
.~ ~..
State of California-Health end Welfare Agency ~ I See Instructions one.lEk (~ je 6 Department of Health Services
.~Form;~'pproved OMB No. 2050--0039 (Expires 9~3) ' and Front ol~lllge 7 Toxic Substances Control Division
- Please or type. (Form designed for use on'~/El~ (12-p#ch typewriter). ~ ' Sacramento, California
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS t. Generator's US EPA ID No. Manifest 2. Page 1
{~ /nocument No. Information in the shaded areas
WASTE. MANIFEST I~r'~l~l i I~C;'I~..~I~OI/ o,i is not required by Federallaw.
5. Transpolar 1 Company Name ' 6. US EPA ID Number C. Stat~ Trana~'s ID
7. Transpo~er 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number E. Stale Transp~"a ID ·
12. Containers 13. Total 14. I.
11. US DOT Description (Including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) Quanti~ Unfl Waste No.
. No. Type Wt / Vol
State
c. State .
EPA/~h~
' ~Al~h~
I I I IIII
K. ~ndling ~ea f~ Waste~ Li~t~ A~ve
J. Additional Des~ipti~s for Martials Listed Above
15. Special Handling Instru~ions and Additional Info.aliGn
GENERATOR'S CE~FICA~ON: I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper $hippiflg name
and are classified, packed, ma~ed, and labeled, and are in all resp~s in propel condition for transpo~ by highway according to applicable international and
national government regulat~na.
If I =m = ~Gr~; ~3t~i 96~.gator,; Ceriify [ha[i have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxiciW of waste generated to the degree I have deter/ned
to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment, storage, or disposal current~ available to me which minimizes the
present and future threat to human health and the environment; OR, if I am a umall quantity generator, I have made a good faith effo~ to minimize my waste
generation and sel~ the best waste management method that ia available to me and that I can afford.
' ted/T
Printed/Typed Name ', Month Day Year
18. Tran,po, er 2 Acknowledgemen~ Receipt of Mate"al, ' -~'
19. Diecrepancy Indication Spa~ - /
' :
~'Fecility Owner or Operat6r Ce~ification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except a$ noted in Item 19.
Printed/Typed Name [ Signature _ / Month Day Year
DHS 8022 A (1/88)
EPA 8700--22
(Rev, 9-88) Previous editions are obsolete.
Do' Not Write Below This Line
V~ite: TSDF SENDS THIS COPY TO DOHS WITHIN 30 DAYS
To: P.O. Box 3000, Sacramento, CA 95812
Et{VIRONMEN'IAL HEAL'IH DIviSION
Telephone (805) 861-3636 . -
HEALTH· OFFICER
Leon M Hebmlson, M.D.
Facil_tty Name /-~ , . ' .. ~~ Kern County Permil¥# .
This fOr~ i's to be ~etu~ned to' t, he Ee~n County Health Department ~ithin 14 -'"
'. ~ days of acceptance of tank(s) by diaposal or ~ecyclin~ facility
A:~:;L::~-holder of_the per,It ~lth .number.noted above is responsible for:'nsu~in~
Da're Tanks Removed ~/~/~ No. of Tanks '~'l -- :.:::':: ::'.
Section 2 - To be filled out ~ contFacto~ "~econt~ina%in[ tank(s~:
Tank "Decontamination" ContFacto~ ~
Authorized ~ep~e8entatlve of cont~acto'~ c'e~ttflea by 'signing below that
ta'nk(s) have. been decontaminated ]n actor(brace with geF~ CountF llea]L~
Department ~equl~ements.
Section 3 -To b~ ~tlled out and si~ ~K a~ authoFized ~ep~esentative o~ t~eatment, .s'to~a~e, or dispos,a~ [a~illty acceptinE tank(s):
Facility Name
Address 2202 S. MILLIKEN AVENUE
ONTARIO, CA
.Date Tanks Received" 3UNE 6~ 1989
Signature ~"~~J
(Authorized Representative) '
AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING? INC.
Phone # (714) 988-.8000
Zip 91781
No. of Tanks 1
Title OFFICE MANAGER _.
* * * MAILING
· (Form #IIMMP-150)
INSTRUCTIONS: Fo.ld Ill half nnd staple.
DISTRICT OF'FICES ' '
17G~3FIower s~eel KERN COUNTY I IEALTH DI!PARI'F~JT HEALTH.OFFICER
' Haker~fleld, California 93305 . ' Leon M Ilobmlson, M.D.
Telephone (805) 061-3636 ENVIIIONMEtJIAL IlEAL]Il DIVISION
; ~~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Relchard
Facility Name ~ , ~~~~~ . Kern County PermJt..~
* * UNDERGROUND TANK DISPOSITION TRACKING RECORD * *
This form ia to be returned to t, he Kern County Health Department wlthln 14
da'ya of acceptance of tank(s) by disposal or recycling facility. Tile .. .-"
. holder of the permit with number noted above is responsible for insuring .'
..... " . .......... ~Jln~_.~h I s . form..An.,.compl e ted and re {nrned.,..==L(.,':-:':~.._ ". ..... ,._.._: .................... ~_,J ....... ~-~&~:: j?~ =,. ~.-..~; '~-.~::'~:~ '---
~ ~ec~l°n
~. - To be filled out ~ te~re~ovel con~: . ~
/
Date 'ranl<s Removed No of Tanks
· · .~ · · · · · · · · · . · . . . ~ ,, ., . , . . . , . . . . ., .. . · .,. · J:i~,~','"~{ .
9ec~ion 2 - To be ~llled ou~ ~ con~rac~or "decoo~nmina~inR
........ ~ ,/ /' ,
Ta.k "DecoutamtnntJon" Contractor ~
AuthoPlzed ~epreaentatlve of cont~actoP cePtlfles by ~lgnJng below
tank(a) have been (i~contamJnaLed Ja accor(hmcc with ~aPn CounL~ Ileal~h
Depa~tmen~ requlPements.
" -- ~S~[ure Ti tle
Section 3 -T~ ~ filled ou~ and ~gned hZ ~l~ audwrlzed representative of the
[reatment, s[oroEe, or disposal facility occeptJnE .tank(s):
Focility Nome. A'MEE~CAN METAL EE~YCL[N~ INC.
Address ~0~ S. 'M~LL~'[~ AVENtJE Phone ~ '(71~)
.ONTAE[O, CA Zip ~1761
Da~e Tonka Received ~UNE 6~ 1~8'~ No. of Tasks
Signature ~~~~ Title OFFICE MANAGER "
(Authorized Representotlve) .
....... *' * -* -'f,~A'IL-ING ]'N-,'q-TRui:TIONffi ..... -F'~.'I'~i ..... ]-'ii ..... lii'~'-IT --and strip l-e .'
(F(Jrm #1I)IMPJ-JSO)
DIRTRIC'r OFFICES
INSPECTION
TANK CLOSURE
Inspector '~\~O,~(kk_ - Date ,PD[ ~[
1. Tank Decontamination
i /Tank decontamination contractor has prior DePartment
~ank decontamination Contractor has on site documentation in use of explosimeter and monthly equipment c~lib~ation.
.~Tank deContam~nat'5on contractor documents tank cleaning,
5~ maximum LEL reading, and certifies decontamination on
tank t~ackSn~ form.
Tank(s) are free of liquid and sludge.
~Licensed hazardous waste hauler collects rinseate and
transports wa~e to appropriaze licensed hazardous
treatment, storage or disposal facility.
TANK(S) ARE A NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE.
Tank Explosive Safety
//Tank(s) are free of liquid.
Tank(s) are grounded.
_ ~/All lines to tank(s) disconnected and removed .from tank
hole.
nk(s) filledwith CO, or other inert gas; 02.level is
below 12%, or a maximum 5% of LEI, wi'th 02 between 16.5%
and 12%; as verified by Environmental Health Services
Meter.
:7-,. C02 dry ice added 4 hours before inspection, minimum 2
lbs per 100 gallons of tank capacity. ~x~_~_~
/ Dispensing device for liqUid or gas inerting is bonded
to tank.
TANK(S) ARE NON-EXPLOSIVE. ·
Tank. Closure in Place
Tank top exposed along entire length.
Vent line still corlnected.
All tank caps are reuloved.
At '[east two holes, . Qne on
........ - :' " 'L--~C k~ ....... :' -~i~'-
Tank(s) filled with two-sack concrete mix.
material flow from ali tank 'top holes.
Witness the
Backfill and compacted as per public works requirements.
· TANK(S) ARE CLOSED IN PLACE.
Tank Removal
/'Tanks are grounded before removal.
All lines to tank(s) disconnected and removed frbm tank
hole.
uthorized tank removal contractor employee on-site
supervising actual tank removai.
%~~'paint.
Tank(s) marked with tank closure permit number with spray
All tank top holes/bungs sealed for transport.
· Licensed hazardous waste hauler transports contaminated
tanks under manifest to appropriate treatment or disposa.'[
facility.
__ Tank tracking form goes wi th tank(s) .
· '~/TANK(S) REMOVED FOR IMMEDIATE TRANSPORT.
Preliminary Site Assessment Sampling
Preliminary assessment contractor has prior Department
approval·. --
.All samples
requirements.
taken as pe~' SW-846, 2nd
All samples are undisturbed.
edition
All samptes taken at locations and dept.hs as per permit..
~S~mples are properly sealed and preserved in icechest at
with blue ice or dry ice. ~q_w~9~L.!f~
COUNTY OF KE
2700 "M" SIreet~ Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA · 93301
Environmental lteaith Services Department
'"FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
! /.~,.,~i~ :~.~,~;_ .
'.:,:' Speedy Catering Invester"s Thrift RLW, Equipment '.
' ' 2602 "F" Street ' . ~2080..~ _::_,. ,~.~.~ _..So', .Union ~Avenue ·
',;.~],~15~,.~~' BakersLakef ieStreetld, CA ~- -Bakersfield, OA ',"'".'~'~'~Bakersfie~d~.~].~,~,~~.
,' License ~29407
PERMIT FOR CLOSURE OF
! TANK(S) AT ABOVE
LEGATION
PERMIT EXPIRES
APPROVAL DATE
APPROVED BY
Phone:(805) 327-9311 Phone:(805).834-1100. -,.:..']i~"'-
May 18, 1989
pREMiSES
· POST ON ..........
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
Permittee must notify the Kern County Environmental Health Department at
(805),861-3656 two working days prior to tank (removal)or inerting and
filling).to arrange for required inspections(s)·
2. Permittee ~ obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action .' ...
Department and Fire Department approved methods as described in Handbook
#UT_30.~
PERMIT FOR pERMANENTCLOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
PERMIT. NUMBER A924-14
ADDENDUM · ·
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
4 .... .' Sot/ Sampling ] : .. · - · :,., . ,., :-, , ...
. ' ~Any deviation;from 'sample locations and numbers
· sampled for which are described below and 'in Handbook ~UT-30 must 'reCeive?j.
· ~ :,prlor~-approval by the Environmental Health Department..
~ :: ..... .~.:/,'./::~:;~.~a.. ~-,._:.(Tank size between 1,000 to 1.0,.000 gallons) ,J~:.mini~um-
.::.??,?:;~,~:~::~;~,:',,.;:~{,~.~7;.;~;;?:~,samples must..be retrieved one-third of the way in from 'the ~nds,
"~ ~',~,~:.~,~:'-'~ ':~ ~]5~{;:',~?-~'~-~'~9~*%' ' ? ' '- - ' ' ~ ' · ' ..... ' ......
~;,:~-~,~m~:,~:.~.:?;~,~::~,~e~:~:?:.of eac~ tang__~_g~.~.p:t.hs_~_o:f.:iapproxzma:g.~}y._::tWo feet :and
,ermlt appltcati°n'a=e to be utiltzed~'~j~Prtor approval mu~ be':grante~
'specialist ,listed on' the ~ermit."q~%~{~:[~?:{:.:,,.:: ' .... "~ ........ ~':""'::'~?" ....
6. "-Soil. Sampling '.(p~ping area) . :., ... . :: ....
- "a ~tnlmu~ of two samples' must be retrieved at depths of' approximately two
.-, ;.'~,::,:,~feet and slx 'feet for every.15 .1.tnear feet. of pipe run and also near .'.,the
.... ~. dispenser area (s) ................... . ........ , .... , ...... ................... ........~.~-. ,, ............... .,?.~
a. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline Samples must be analyzed 'for benzene/
toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. .~. .. :-f
8. Copies of transportation manifests' must be submitted to the Kern County
Environmental Health Department within five days of waste disposal..."~..~.~ .....
9. All applicable' state laws .for hazardous waste disposal, transportation,
or treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Environmental Healt~
Department must be notified before movin~ and/o~ ~di~o~i'n~ of .~n~
10. Permittee is ~esponsible for ~aking sure that "tank disposition
record" 'issued 'with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14
of
tank
~a~s removal. . ~. ., ......
..... ...:...,,-
Advise 'this office of the ti~e and"date 'of the proposed sampling ~ith 24
hOurs advance notice.
12. Results 'must be submitted to this ]office within three 'days of ,analysis
' CO~p ~ e' o~. ' ;' .~...-:~;
ACCEPTED BY: ~ DATE '":'
TC: cas :dr ':'
K~.~ .C~ itZALTII DLPARTMRNT
DIVISION OF' P. NVIR(~AL U~ALTH
l'lO0 L~LOMBR STREET. Ikqir~,l~IRLI).' CA 9~305
(606) 881-3836 ..
I
C~MICAL 8TOI~D (NON~CIAL lANK)
TO i~ACILITY IqWVID~O 8Y
SOIL TYPE AJa) GROUNDMATEit DEPTH DSTKRMINATION
I~IB8 TYP~ IiB #ITHIN ~0. ~
.~-1. '
PREVIOUSLY
)BSCRIB8 BOM RF,~IDUI IN TAMK(8) AND PIPIN6 IS TO B~ RBMOVBO AND DISPOSED OF (INCLUDE T~?b__-,~:_~A?IOM
,, ,5-+Z
PIPIM~
* * ~LKASE PttOVIDE INFO~L~TTON REOI~..S'T~O O~ Rf~'ERg~ sipK OF l~TS SHSl~ BBFORS SUBMITYTNG APPLICATION
"~ ~"~ -~"~ ~'~"~n ' .~,..,~. ~_.~. ~m, o~ ~-~- xs-~-~ ~e~, ..........
(ForB ~HNMP-14O)
~'~,R~ID~ DRAWING OF PHYSICAL i ~OUT OF FACILITY USING SPACE P~ '~VIDED BELOW.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFO~0N MUST-BE .INCLUDED IN ORDER ICATION TO BE
PROCESSED:
/P~~ ~LI~ ~TI~S D~I~ BY miS. ~L "~"
~ ~ ~.~s OR S~A~ ~ WI~IN 100' ~IUS OF FAC~ u'
Permit Cf ,/,--//ODO( .. -'
tNTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific TimeAccou. pti_ng
Site Specific Status Changes:
· ' '. -.-?-.'t.' :..,:,
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet ....
.: ~:~-'~
Permit'Cf !~_~
Employee Cf
Employee Signature 7~-~ ~/!~. __.~
Site Name or Addre,~ ~__,. ,~__~ ~. (,.'"'~
Funding (Local, State, of Federal) ~'~
Site Specific Status Changes:
Hours
Category Activity
Date Code Code Description . ,'~r.."-
Notes: . .
.':_~.,,--A,.--.,-,-.-,.,,,/' .."::~-,'~-,-~/: '-'-~-'-',--~-'-". ~'--' ~"-'"""~'-'"-'"
~..~ ....... "¢'-- J--/~..,.. ,,"
.... ,~uxx'"-~ ..... f'~-~:~-'-~ ;~:-~:--~.~ ...... ~-;~:~'~-- .... ;~':'~ .... i-~- ~',~"'','" -~
' i ·
Data Entered By: Date: ~,,.
Employee # '
Employee Si ~n~ature
Fun~ing (Local, S~te-,
_~~C~ OP~J:ONS ~OR ~NG
S2te Specific ~me Accounting
8i~e 8~e¢i£±c St~s C~a~ges:
Date Code- ,Code Descrlp=~on ( 10~s
Notes:
~ - I , ' 4 ~ '~'
- ' ," " '' , '
~ ~te~ By: ~te :. · . .: ' -, .~ ,'Z-'..
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR T,F~KING TANKS ...
Site Specific Time %ccounting Sheet '
' Site Specific Status Changes:
?e~t # } J ,9PO ,I
Employee Signature /',~ , 0~
Funding (L0c,al, State, .df Federal) ~
~ Hours
Da/te, ~eegOry Activity (10thc)
Code Description
/ '~, ~.o .-~
Notes:
i / . ' f
i / ' ~'// -[' ,'? /"" ~ , ..... ' ','-,, '"~ ) ~' Y" '~'
,--/ 1-~>% 1. ~ ~ ,(. ',~s~'~ ~-~- / 'Y*/[--J ( ~ ' ....-~zc,..~' ::.{ /, - , .. ,' ~ ,~ , ,~ ,.
' ......... z ~'' -' . 'Da~e: , . /
eCONTRACT OPTIONS' FOR LRAIRING
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Employee #
EmPl°yeo Signature ;~/<~/~
Site Name or AddreS~ ~
Funding (Local, State
· Site Specific Status Changes:
eegory Activity =' ..........
Date Code Description
Notes: . ~ '
-..'L) :1' [, ~'j~ ..
..
Permit #
'CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Employee #
Employee Signature //m~
Site Name or Addre,,~ ~..~
Funding (Local, State, 6f Federal)
Site Specific Status Changes:
~Ca~t~e~ory Activity Hours
Code Description (lOths) .. '.
Date
Notes: .
.~F'~ ~.,.q.;--,~ , ,t. r.-~- ,,~ , ~ ' ' ' ' ·
I ~,~ . ....
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Healtl~ 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89)
~CT OPTIONS FOR
Site Specific Time Accounting
Permit # /%..'-7.~O (." Site Specific Status Changes:
Date Code
~/z~ .., 0 ~
Notes:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS .
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
,?....?:.- .',
Permit
Employee
Site Name or Addres~ Q // [
.... ~ ~.R~.
Funding (Local, State, 'of Federal
Site Specific Status Changes:
c ivi y o=s .
:Date~,~= Code Description ( 10ths ) "
Notes:
~.,4 ..~ 'I
/ '._ · ~ ,? . .. . ~ ~ , ·
~ ~. .~ ~ ,?.~ ,/~..' '4 '"~"-' ,~!t ~ ~ '~t · ,~ t
~' "-'~ /~ ~ ."'~.~ ~ '~- ' :' 'r '" '~"'~ / , , '
, ,
~ ~ter~ By: ~te:
Env, Health 580 4113 13'7 (Rev. 5/89)
OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting
Permit # ; z/- ~O/T g). /: Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ,.~ /]
Employee Signature ./~ (/ ~
Site Name or . ~..._:~.~.,: ,. ~,..r ~..~-:.c¥ ;
Address:.</ ~ ~."j~/~ ~'~
Funding (Local, State, 'of Federal) ---~
Date----=--~ Code- ~----~ uo~e Description (10the)
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKINGTANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # /,~/,?.<?.(3 / Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee # ~ ~..
Employee Signature .~/~_,~ /
Site Name or AddreSs ~__:;.e../'..., /
Funding (L~cal, State,' of F~deral) .~±
Cat, egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description ( 10the
Notes:
(
'- ---r .-~ / ; ,' ,.."-
:,~-~!] ..... ,.~..,,/ ,~-~ ~?~..~ ,.~.~. ,. . . . .. , .,
, /,' ~ ~ .-/. ........ .-,.,~ .~>_~?~ ':,: .-,:, ~, ,/ ..... ~.t,,
,,. /,.. ,'
· ,,. ., .
/
I
Data Entered By: Date:
Env. Health 580 ~113 137 (Rev. 5189)
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting
Employee #
Employee Signature
,
~ing (~cal, S~te, of F~o~I)
Site Specific Status Changes:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR T,P~ING ~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet.
Permit # ;~-.~-,'9C'~.,"~ ~ Site Specific Status Changes:
iEmployee # ..-
·" ~ . /,; !,.; ;,,,_-, .... · ?,': .:..
Site ~ne or A~a.re~s <,._ ,:~/, ~-~- -
'Funding (Local, State,~'of Fedena~) ~
Cat~egory Activity Hours -." ."
Date t~x/e Code Description (10ths)
Notes:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5~89)
CONTRACT OPTIONs FOR T,F. AKING
Site Specific Time A'ccounting
Permit # ;,~.C:~<? !~. Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee #-
Site Name or Address'" ~- /'
Funding (Local, State, >of F~deral)
Date ~eeg ~o~e Description (!0ths) ~i!>'.
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Employee ~
Si__turegna
Employee
Site Name or A~ldress'
. ..--~0 .,.- 4, '~"~ '
Funding (Local, State, 'of Federal) ~-~
Site Specific Status Changes:
Cat. egory Activity Hours
Date uo~e Code Description (10ths)
" ' '.
~ ~ter~ By: - ' ~ ~te: .
~CT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting
Employee # " ,A
Funding (Local, State, of FederAl)
Site Specific Status Changes:
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # ./:/':9~ ::/ Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee
Employee Signature :~c ~"/×~.~., ~.~_..._ ~
Funding (Local, State, Of Federal
Cat. egory Activity ' Hours
Date t~ae Code Description ~ ~~[~, ( lO~s )
h~ ~ter~ By: Date:
IEnv. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5189)
Site Specific Time Accounting
Employee #
Site Specific Status Changes:
Employee Signature ~.
Site Name or'Address Q
Funding (Local, State, of, Fed~al)
Site Specific Time Account~g Sheet
Per.it # M 0 o r) (
Employee #
Employee Signature
Site Name or ;utare~;
Funding (Local, State, 6f FedS-al)
Site Specific Status Changes:
Date C~eegOry Activity : '' Hours -
~ ,:,~, ~. : ~. . /..t
Notes-: ...... '. ' ' · · -
Env. l-lealtn 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5~89)
Empi6yee '% "
Site Specific Time Accounting
Site Specific Status Changes:
Em~=!oyee.Signature ,~.,= /! .......
~ite Name or
kn~ding (Local, State, Of Federal) ', '~<
Hours
Date Code Code Descrlp~lo
Employee #
Employee Signature /~
Site Name or AdM~ C~i7 / (' ' '
Funding (Local, State, 6f Federal)
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TAN~S
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet'"~
Site Specific Status Changes:
Notes':
Code Description
Hours
(10tbs)
Data Entered By:
Date:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev
Site. Specific Time Accounting
CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR ~,P~K:I:NG ~ANY~
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # I ~ O0 0 ~
Site Specific Status Changes:
Date.. ~eego~ Activity Hours
Code Description ' (10ths)
~.t,~,/~1 ~ .?,~ ~.~'
Notes:
~ ~ter~ By: Date:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev, 5/89)
OPTIONS FOR LEAKING
Site Specific Time Accounting
Site Specific Status Changes:
Date~'- Code Description
Notes ~
CONTRACT oPTIoNs ,FOR LEAKING TANKS
Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet
Permit # / ~//~2~/ . Site Specific Status Changes:
.Employee # A/~{~- 7~'"', ~_.~T~:~R.~'
Site ~e or ,,,es~'~ '~~/~ ~;' .-' '?
Date ~eegOry Actigity " ' I Hours
· Code DescriPtion ! ~ ( 10ths )
'~ Enter~ By: ' Date:
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89)
2700 "M" Street, suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number
COUNTY OF KERN
Environmental Health Services Department
May 1', 1989
investors--Thrift ....................................................... ~ ......... .~ ..... ..~,..._ ..............
C/O Tom Bates
2602 "F" Street
Bakersfield,~ California 93301
RE: Permit Number 140001
Dear Mr. Bates:
It has come to tHe'attention of the Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department that there has been a change of
ownership concerning underground storage tanks located at 315 Lake
Street, Bakersfield California 93305.
'According to our recordS, interim per'its to operate were
issued to Marvin Sprayberry for this facility. A permit to operate
underground storage tanks is not transferrable as stated on the
permit conditions and on the permit itself'
You are therefore in violation of
1. Division 8,.section 8.48.110(B) of Kern County Ordinance
which states '"arty person assuming ownership of an
underground storage tank used for the. storage of
hazardous substances for which a valid permit to operate
has been issued shall have thirty (30) days after the
date of assumption of ownership to apply for a permit to
operate...,, :-
2. Division 20, Chapter 6,7, Section 25284(a) of the.
California Healttl and Safety Code which states "...no
person shall own or operate an underground storage tank
unless a permit for its oPeration has been~issued by the
local agency to the Owner."
I have enclosed the application for permit to operate the
facility. The completed forms must be returned to this office
wi.thi, n--.two-weeks~of ..... the-_-date~-~of ..... ~his ..... letter ........ Since date of
ownership transfer was .October 27, 1988, the permit invo~ce'wi-ll .......
be back dated to reflect your anniversary date and a 50~ penalty
.charge will ,.be added"as ' required in the County fee ordinance.
Annual ~.ees are charged for the permit, thus your next billing date
will be October 27, 1989. The current fee invoice.is enclosed.
Investors Thrift
May 1, 1989
Page 2
As ~'per the California Health and safety Code Chapter 6.7
Section ..25287(b) which states "this fee shall include a
surcharge...", th'e Kern County Environmental 'Hea'lth Services'
Department must assess a surcharge 'of fifty-six dollars ($56.00)
per frank on each person who submits an application for a new
facility or transfer of ownership. This amount is also reflected
on the enclosed invoice.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
me at (805) 861-3636. Your cooperation is much appreciated.
TRC:cas
Very truly yours,
Turonda R. Crumpler, R.E.H.S.
Environmental Health Specialist I
Hazardous Materials ~anagement Program
Enclosures
\lakest.vio
4-26-40
:~ .. O000 ,'
I t "'
, 0~0 0
00000
{£O0-tO0
iO0£-)tO
· £0 -..0000 ......
', ;iNOW 9S( ~ 8;099 i 0SOt0
')l)) $]NXVH I t ~ !:gOO-tO0
}NI1))N¥ ]dAH
40 -, 0050 ......
OI)lJSU]XV6
x09 0 d '~
O~]Xj$~]xyG---~ ......... ).
- ~ 00000 ,
~£O0-tO0 ~
.10 -, 0000 ......
.~3AIN3X ti8 -- i "'
· ~AtN3~ tLS ,-
....' O0000
,~ ~gO0-tO0 -.
· ZO -. 0000 ......
0131~$83~¥6
i)i¥ 139 OOt9 .-
e~3IJsa3xva I '"
~iv isa 0or9 -- 8so98 osoto
· .~ too-too
:~HlU¥ $U315¥W )/-O0-EO~OOf-VtO .-.
.zO ,. 0000 .....
O13IJ$~3~v6 ....
'~^LlflU~ 9tBZ ~ gZZB~ 050tO ~-
~. '5 00000
,~ =.EOO-tO0 ~..
. ~i~ #OSNaOr ))-O0-20rOOS-etO
.zO -. 0000
O13lJS~]~V9 :
O131~Sul~vg Z~~tOOZO8~ ...
:0 tw3x 80VZ --- 8fO6Z ! OtOEO ~
~ S -' 00000
.:~50) a])#]d$ ]t-O0-t0?005-)t0 ....
~zc -. oooo ......
O131J$~]~va
;v~alv~ 0Ztt -
,
t
ll'~ 39Vd
Stw
~ . ;t) # ,
]AIL)V
.,~ .,'~ 8LItglSO
- ZgO~9 -
~ · .,, 901 t - ' --££~t-~£t~
-- rig;Or -
~6Z f£ -- 'LLfO-~Zt9"
* 00000 -- 850~ ~, 0000 ~, t--g
15 )Itl (tg - - :
tOf£6 Y~ ol]lJSa]Xve
lS J ZO~Z - :j,'
t0££6 V3 gl)X$Sa3~vg
t~O~t
~s ~ zo~z ~ z~gm8 ' ~-
,- 5 - ooooor~-
Wot $)Lwex t .- foo-to0\ -.
I{I{#Li$UOI$]4NI ~-O0-gtoOg~-*lOx~x
ZOZ Ott ~uc utt
~ NU)] -- £~ '--5-t ,, t--e i.
- lS J ~O9Z -
- ...... ,, ...... tO£g6 V) -OlJIJSUI~Vg'
881ZZIO[ !S J ZO~Z ~- t9Otg 006~g
- ~ ,'., S - 00000 ,,
~ -, NOt S]1V61 t .~ gOO-tOO ~.
· -, 9gt',OtZ
ti0 t6
]AIX)V
0ZZ'tgg
- O000O -- 850 =., 0000 ...... !*
- ,, 908£6 V) al]lJSalXv6 i;
.... )AV.lll) ZO6Z - lI
- 90£g6 V3 O131JSU]]wg i .-.
£81081[[ ]AW 1119 ZO6Z ~ ZZOZ8 O06gt ~.
. ,, i t ~ gOO-tOO -.
tgt't£
6tZ,59t
- L~Z t£
0V6'Ot
......... Ot6'Ot
]AIJ3V
]AIL2V
Ot6'Ot
-. 9ZO'Z5
85t tt
]AIL)V
9Zi'Z5
~., 5£0'86
~ /Of'9c
]AII)V
S£0'98
- 00000 -- {{Oi -, OO00 .......
S0££61S A])AIN31 OZ£
-- " ~0££6 V) O1)lJSa))V6 ;~ ..,
EZ8 39Vd ~___
\
t
t
t
0
ZZ~
* .Vt I
t
' '-: " '"' 04/07
L
DETAC~
~A..?H DE.PARTME_NT 'ii':'::::'~ ' ;"
(805)'t861-3636 --'" .,' ~'.: "-'~' ..Office Address:
· !?:,,;!.i~:', C.r',:,. ,~:~:.~'m~'-~.~:,~!~:. ~'.,- :.
. ~..'~c,h .:~ ':, ~, ,
]PER~1T/~NVOICE ~40001c-8g
,i. SPRAYBERRy, MARVIN
~ SPEEDIE CATERING CORPORATION
( P.0. 'BOX'~6128 "
~ BAKERSFIELD. CA 93386
ola--/.
1415 Truxtun Aven~~
Bakersfield, CA 93301
2700 M ,Street, Bakersfield
100.00
AMOUH~ENCLQSEDfj;
CHARGES PAST DUE ARE SUBJECT TO PENALTY-
05/07/89 J
HERE ----I .,i: PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION 'TO INSURE CORRECT PAYMEI~IT.. IDENTIFICATION
SEND'iPAYMENT ~ITHIN 30 DAYS TO AVOID 50% PENALTY
,:,:'::1:~? ~!. *: ' -::.:,?~:.':~.~k-k~.,r~,, ,.,.VJ.~ ;' ':>"~,4 'i,: :" .~
89 PERMIT/INV~iOICE # ~40001C-89
ANNUAL FEEi FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE
..... _W.I ~H __1 .... TAiNK.( S )--:.LOCATED- AT:
315 LAKE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY
100 .00
" ..'!l KERN COUNTY ' ' '
: HEALTH DEPARTMENT .~ECTIC)N 3807 PENAttIE$. If any fee ,equired by ,his d ............ pold ...... he /'
FILE ,JONTEN'rS IN~,'~ITOH¥
Construction Permit I Date /:
Permit to abandont No. ~ Tanks Date
~ended Petal: Condi:tons
~PermiC Application'Form, / Tank S~e'ets, 'Pt~ P~ ~ ,,
~Apptication to Abandon tanks(s) Date
I~]Copy ag Written Cont~ac~ Betwee~n Owner & Operator
I~lnapect ton Reports
I~]Correspondence - RacaLvad
l'lCor r esponden'ce - Ns/led
Unauthorlsed Relaaaa Reports
&bandonmant/Cloaura Raper ta
-- Data
Data .,?:.'
Checkl iai)
Chackl est)
I'lSampl Lng/Lab Ra~orta '
r'l#VF Compliance Check (NeW "COn'atruction
C]STD C~plianca Check (Haw Construction
I'I#vF .Plan Check (#aw Construction)
I'ISTD Plan Check (#aw Construction}
CiNVF Plan Check (~xiating Facility)
r"ISTD Plan Chaok (.lxiati~j, Facility)
r'l"Incomplete Application, Form
l'lPemit Application Checklist
CJPermit Instructions I-IDl acer.dad
C]?ightnasa Teat Rasults '--
received
Data
inspection time'',
Da ta
Da tm
I~]Nonitoring Well Cons:ruction Data/Parmlt~
~Enviro~efltal Sensitivity Data~
G~ound~ater Drilling, Boring Logs
Location of.~ater Nails
~Stateeent ce Underground Conduits
~Plot Plan eeaturing All Bnvtronmentally Sensitive
~PhoCos ~Construction Dravings Location:
~flal~ ·sheet showing ~ate and-tally
~Mi ~cel laneou.
~tc
1700 Flower Street
Bakersfield, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
TO OPERAT
FACILITY =~ ~ -
-~:~-~-= ---.-STORAGE
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPART
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S, Relchard
PERMIT#'14OOOl¢
ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986
EXPI RES: ~u%Y 1, 1989
NUMBER ~0F TANKS= -! ...... - ......... -~
FACILITY:
SPEEDIE CATERING CORPORATION
315 ~AKE STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CA
OWNER:
SPRAYBERRY, MARVIN
315 LAKE STREET
.BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
TANK #
1
AGE{ IN YRS} .- SUBSTANCE CODE
UNK MVF 3
PRESSURIZED PIPING?"
NO
NOTE: ALL 'INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT
NON--TRANSFERABLE ** ~ POST ON PREMISES
'DATE PERMIT MAIT,RD: JUL 1 6 1986
DATE PERMIT CH~CK LIST RETURNED:
Kern County Health Departme~ .
Division o£ Environmental /th~.
1700 Flower Street, Bakersf/~ld, t~ .93305
appl i ca t i o~a.t~-
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
..
· HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES~ STORAGE FACILITY
Type of Applica[ion (check):
[-~N~w Facility ~'~Modification_of Facility !~isting Facility [~Transfer of Ownership
A. Emergency 24-Hour .Contact (name, area code, P~one)': Days ~R[~p,~ ~'P/F~,~,
~ Nights ,, I
Facility Name ~PS~51~ C~-~-~e'~k Cd ~P- ' No. of Tanks / .
_ Type of Business _.('check)~: .... ~lGasoline_~t/ation ~Jcher _(describe) =~0
'=='~ Is Tank(S) Loqated on an Agricultural Farm? ' [~Yes ~]4~o
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? ~Yes ~
Facility Address ~ /~c- /_~ f7-- Nearest Cross St..
T R SEC (Rural Locations ~ly)
Owner ~A~ ~)~;9~.~_,F~ Contact Person ~.'R~z~;~
;%ddress ~ 7~/.~-Z~',-- Zip ~3°~--- Telephone ~.?~?~
Operator :?~. · Contact Perman
Address ................... · Zip ._Telephone .....................................
B. Water to Facility Provided by (~tl~ ~r~F~ Depth to' Groundwater
Soil Characteristics' at Facility
· Basis. for Soil Type~ and 6rom~d~ater D~pth Detemlnstions
Contractor
Address
Proposed Sta'rting Date
Worker's Ccmpensation Certification
CA Contractor's License No.
Zip Telephone
P[oposed CaupI~tion l)ate
Insurer
De
If This Permit Is For Modification Of An EXisti~ Facility, Briefly Describe Modificatiuns
Proposed
Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
Tank ! Nacre Product Motor_ Vehicle ' Unleaded Regular Premium Diesel Waste
~
Chemical Ccmpositi~ of Materials Stored (~t ~ces~ry rotator vehicle f~ls)
Tank $ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) CAS ! (if kno~) t~mieal Previously
(if different)
Transfer of Ownership
Date of~--ar~fer
Previous FacilityName
I,
Previous Owner
accept fully all Obligations. Of Permit No. issued to
I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and
modify' or termir~te the transfer of the Permit.to Operate this ~derqro~d storage
facility upon receiving this ccmpleted form;
e
TANK ~ ( (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM . TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK AI.L APPROPRIATE BOXES
Tank is: []Vaulted []Non-Vaulted []Double-Wall ~]Single-Wall'
~ 'Material ~
~Carbon Steel Fl Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] FiberglasS-Clad .steel
~]Fiberglass-Re.inforced Plastic [-]Concrete i[-IAlum~in~m~ []Bronze ~known
[-] Other (describe)
Primary Containment
Date .Installed Thickness (Inches)
Capacity (Gallons)
7J
[] Lined Vault
Manufacturer
Thickness (Inches)
[]Phenolic []Glass
4. 'Tank Secondary C6ntainment
[-1Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner
i-]Other (describe):
[~Material
5. Tank Interior Lining
~']'Rubber Iq mkyd
~lOther (describe):
e
e
10.
[] None ~known
· Manufacturer:
Capacity (Gals.)
[] Clay [-]unlined
Tank Corrosion Protection
-
~Tar or ~p~ltx ~k~m ~ ~Other (de~ri~): .' ,." :7'
Cath~ic Protection: ~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~tm
~riN System i Equi~ent:
Leak Detection, ~nitori~., and Interception
a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ t~ks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~ll(s)
~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~~ Wi~out ~ner
~ U-~ wi~ C~tible Liner Dir~.ti~ Flow
~ Va~r ~t~tor* ~ Li~id ~el ~n~r' ~ Co~tivit~
~ Pressure Sen~r in ~ular S~ of ~uble Wall .Tank-
q uid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~11
ily Ga~i~ & I~entory Reconciliation ~ri~ic Tigh~e~ T~ti~ '
F1 None [2] Unknown [] Other
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'
[]Monitoring S~p with Race~y []Sealed Concrete Race~y.
D~Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway FTSynthetic Liner Raceway F]None
nknown [2]Other
*Describe Make & ~k~lel:
~en Tightness Tested? FlYes []No ~known
Date of Last Tightness Test Results 'of Test
Test Name Testing C~npany
Tank Re,aa r
Tank Repaired? []Yes ~]~qo [']Unknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
Overfill Protection --
rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level
OTape Float Gau~e FlFloat Vent Valves [] Auto Shut2 Off Controls
[]Capacitance Sensor DSealed Fill Box ~None []unknown
[-]Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices
11. Piping ',
a. Underground Piping: ~es [:]No []unknown Material
Thickness (inche~ ' Diameter Manufacturer
[2]Pressure [~'Suct'i'on DGravity Approximate Length Of Pipe ~
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
u olyethylene Wrap [qElectrical. Isolation []Vinyl Wrap []Tar or Asphalt
nknown []None ~]Other (describe): i
c. Underground Pipirg, Secondary Containment: i /
[]Double-Wall [-]Synthetic Liner System [-]None ~Unknown
,[]Other (describe):
I I
r
-.,.-. ..... :: ..... ....... .~.:.,:::~ ..:~ ':~RECEIP-T CERTIFIED MAIL ~'~
-'~ "~ - .... ~ . . ,.-~ . '~;~ .-~:: NO NSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
........... ',': - - .~:~ .- -~:~'~,~" ~:: ~0T FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
~.:,.~: 't ~- -:~ . ~ ' (See Reve se/
d
-... ..." . . . . Y
.... ~ostage S -'
Cemfied Fee
S~ial Delivery Fee
"" Restnct~ Dehvery Fee
' Relurn
' ' to whom and Date Delivered
~ Return Receipt show~ng to whom.
~ Da(e. and Abdress of Dehve~
" ' ' ..... ' ' ~ TOTAL Postage and Fees
Postmark or Date
- .:::. ;..' ':.: .... -...~ ..--.. ':.,..:,... :.~.
.- .','.' .... .., ., ... . . . . .,':,'.:;.': ., '-.
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT,,_.
(805) 861-3636 'r:L
RERMIT/INVOICE
SPRAYBERR~ MARVIN
-SPEEDIE CATERING
P.O. BOX 6128
BAKERSFIELD, CA
Mailing Address:
Office Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
2700 M Street, Bakersfield
CORPORATION
93386
CHARGES PAST DUE ARE SUBJECT TO PENALTY
05/0?/89 J
DETACH HERE PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION TO INSURE CORRECT PAYMENT IDENTIFICATION
SE~D PAYMENT ~I~HIN 80 DAYS TO AVOID ADDITIONAL §0~ PENA~:~,~ ,, .,~
04/07
89 PERMIT/INVOICE # 140001C-88
FISCAL YEAR 88/89 FEE FOR PERMIT
~ITtt. 1 TANK(S) LOCATED 'AT:
TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND STORA
315 LAKE STREET
BAKERSFIELD. CA
50% PENALTY FOR LATE PAYMENT OF
ORIGINAL INVOICE
DETACH HERE
;,~=?,~ , , ,,,~ "~,,,~1
GE FACILITYi!
100.00
§0.00
:'. ' f' "[ KERN COUNTY HEALTHDEPARTMENT .VCTO~
. " , , ~ ~ ] delinquency dale, in addition lo such fee, the OD IIc0nl shall ~y a penal~ equal to fifty
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, California ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVI:~ION
Mailing Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue o-'
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEi,.. ~HTM ;~
April 4, 1989
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'.
Vernon S. Reichard
Mar~in Sprayberry
Speedie Catering Corporation
P.O. Box 6128
Bak~r~i~i-~-,---CA --.9~386'~--~.- . .......... ._..~
Dear Mr."Sprayberry:
This letter is an official notice of your non-compliance with
state and county laws relating to underground tanks.
Upon review of'our records, it was discovered that the 1988
Permit to Operate fees for Speedie Catering Corporation, 3.15 Lake
Street, Bakersfield, California were not paid. Enclosed ts a cgpY.
of 1988's invoice plus the 50% late penalty required by county
ordinance. The second invoice is for this year's Permit to
Operate fees. These invoices must be paid within 30 days to avoid
further penalties and/or lega~ action.
Be advised that these fees must be paid even if the tanks are
no longer in use. If the tanks are not in use, a permit for
permanent closure must be obtained from this office. Permanent
closure requires either removal or closure in place of your tanks
and assessment by soil sampling to determine whether there has been
environmental damage as a result of unauthorized-releases of
hazardous substances frQm your tank site. The specific
requirements for these activities are in Handbook #UT-30, available
with.your application. No closure activity can beg!R prior to the
issuance of a permit from this office.
If you have any questions or feel this assessment is in error,
or if you would like an application, and o~r handbook on permanent
closure please call me at (805)861-3636. Your prompt attention to
this very important matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lydia von Sydow :
Environmental Health Technician
..................... Hazardous- Mater. ia,ls~. Management -- Program .................... ..
DISTRICT OFFICES
Delann · I.amr)nt · Lake Isabella · M~iave · Ridqecrest · Shafter · Taft
' COUNTY OF KER
Environmental Health Services Department
2700 "M" Streel, Suile 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number ~\
May 1, 1989
Investors Thrift
.............. C/0 ..... Tom Bates
2602 "F" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301 ·
Dear. Mr. Bates:
It has come to the attention of ~he Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department that there has been a change of
ownership concerning underground storage tanks located at 315 Lake
Street, Bakersfield, California 93305.
According to our records, interim permits to. operate were
issued to Marvin.Sprayberry for this facility. A permit to qperate ·
underground storage tanks is not transferrable as stated on the
permit conditions and on the permit itself.
You are therefore in violation of :
1. Division 8, section 8.48.110(B) of Kern County Ordinance
which, states "any person assuming ownership of an
underground storage tank used for the 'storage of
hazardous substances for which a valid permit to operate
has' been issued shall have thirty (30) days.after the
date of assumptioq of ownership to apply for a'permi.t to.
operate..."
2. Division 20, Chap't'er 6,7~ Section 25284(a) of the
California Health and Safety Code which .states "'..no
person shall own or operate an underground storage tank
unless a permit for its operation has been issued by the
local agency to the owner."
I 'have enclosed the application for permit to operate the
facility. The completed forms must be returned 'to this office
within two weeks of the date of this letter. Since date'of
........................ ownership-.-transf'er'-was--.~Oc~ober---2X-,- 1_988, the _pe~mi~_in~o. ice_.wi.l~
be back dated t° reflect your anniversary date and a 50~ penalty
charge will be added as required in the County fee ordinance.
Annual fees are charged for the permit, thus your next billing date
will be October 27, 1989. The current fee invoice, is enclosed.
Investors Thrift
May 1, 1989
· Page 2
As per the' California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.?
Section 25287(b) which states "this fee shall include a
surcharge. · ·", the Kern County Environmental Health Services
Depar.tment must assess a surcharge of fifty-six dollars ($56.00)
per .~tank on each person who submits an application for a~ new
facility ~or transfer of ownership. ° This amount is also reflected
on t'he enclosed invoice.
If you. have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
me at (805) 861-3636. Your cooperation is much appreciated.
TRC: cas
Very truly yours,
cx.r',_£~'-~w- . ~._... ~.-_.x::_. . ~'~
Turonda ~. Crumpler,
Environmental Health Specialist I
Hazardous Materials Management Program
Enclosures
\lakest.vio
4-26-40