HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNDERGROUND TANK FILE #1 5/1989STATE ROUTE 17'8
SPARKLE CLEANERS' SITE
NTEREY
BAcKHoE
TESTHOLES ,
OVERHEAD
CANOPY
I
TESTHOLES
FOUR
'~,'o
Hospil~
,mi
[i
EXHIBIT
VICINITY
1
MAP
MONTEREY
SCALE I INCH: 40 FEET
s,~.: so'n'°M HoLE LOC~'nON
EXHIBIT 2A
BORING' LOCATION MAP
SCALE I INCH: 4O FEET
EXHIBIT
SITE
LAYOUT
MAP
'
ii!
"" " / A.M.~
FOR- _ ATE t t'
AREA COO~ UMSE ~ ~ S O ~LEASECALL
MESSAGE , . ~ -- ~[ ~
~lkk
- ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' CAME TO
_ ' - / J I..WANTS TO
Employee Signature 0 ~f.~l, (~f)
Funding (Loc~l. State. o~ Fede,~l) ...... _~_ ..................... ~___
ICat. IActivtty I 'JH~r~
__~ /~_/~_~_ [ .... .~_ .... ~ ___~ ~_ ...... J_ ~::~ ~,~:~_ .... ~ ..... ~,,::(:~ ~!,:.~ ~ ................................ ~__~,~_~__.
Notes
__~___~___~i~A__~__~ .... ~z ..... ~::~:~L~_, .... ~___~: .... ~_~;:¢___z~ ................
_~~.~__,.~:c~_[~___~.,:~____~ .... :b~_:~ .... ,,~z~____A~ .... ,~_~:~_:_ .......................
Data Entered By ......................... Oate
Env. Health 580 4113 137 (12/88)
C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNIING SIIEET
Permit Il
,
Employee Signature .....
Funding (Local, State, o~ Federal) L .................................................
Date Icodo ~Code mOescrlption of A Y ...................................
----~ ......... ~ ........... I ............ ~-- ' ·
Notes ......... ~ ..........................................................................
Data Entered By .......................... Date ........................
FILE CONTE.~ITS SUMMARY
SENSITIVITY:
Activity Date # Of Tanks
Comments
GARY J: WICKS
- Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOURCE NT
DEPART~~MENTAL
2700 M Street, Sulle 300
Bakersfield; CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
April 26, 1990
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
SUBJECT: Location :
121 MOnterey Street, Bakersfield, CA
Known As : Sparkle Cleaners
Permit # : 140006
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at
the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency
was accurate and representative of existing conditions,'it is the position of this
office that no further action is required at this time.
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the
California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future
operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up
existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause
or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water
quality or public health.
Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site
may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the
property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report
content, future contamination findings, or site usage.
(805) 86J-3636.
.
Program Manager
you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Gough at
Environmental Health Services Department
CB:DG:cd
cc: John Wilson, Wilson and.Associates
colt\140006, b
SS0C TES
CIVIL ENGINI=EI:::IIN(~ SUI:::IV;:::YING
April 23, 1990
M~. Chris Berger
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Kern County Environmental Health Department
2700 "M" Street suite 300
Bakersfield, Ca. 93301
SUBJECT:
SPARKLE CLEANERS - ACCOUNTSP49e66REQUEST FORADDITIONAL
MONIES PURSUANT TOKERNCOUNTY'SLOCALOVERSIGHT OPTION.
Dear Mr. Berger:
Pursuant to our conversation on Friday April 20, 1990 and the
County's letter dated April 10, 1990, the owner/agent for Sparkle
Cleaners respectfully requests that the county allow Sparkle
Cleaners to forego the submission of an additional $1,000.00 to
cover oversight expenses. Sparkle Cleaners is making this request
for the following reasons:
* The project has been completed;
The report (included with this correspondence) has been
completed;
Remaining overview will not likely exceed the amount
remaining in the account;
Sparkle Cleaners will pay upon submission of an invoice
any charges in excess of the original contract.
ThaDk you for your consideration in this matter. Kindly
respond to this request in a timely fashion so that Sparkle
Cleaners will not be forced into the State program.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILSON & ASSOCIATES
Philip Goalwin, R G # 779
Principal Hydrogeologist
cc: Susan Gonzales
1701 WF=ST~/IN[D [3)~IIVEE · SUITE 113 · BAKEI~SI~II~L0, CA ~)3301
- ]II_50N &
OlVIL EN(~INEERING SI_II:qVEYING
April-- 23, 1990 ~
Mr. Chris Berger
Environmental Health Specialist IV
Kern County Environmental Health Department
2700 "M" Street Suite 300
Bakersfield, Ca.. 93301.
SUBJECT: SPARKLE CLEANERS - ACCOUNT$140066REQUESTFORADDITIONAL
MONIES PURSUANT TOKERNCOUNTY'SLOCALOVERSIGHTOPTION.
Dear Mr. Berger:
Pursuant to our conversation on Friday April 20, 1990 and the
'County's letter dated April 10, 1990, the owner/agent for Sparkle
Cleaners respectfully requests that· the county allow Sparkle
Cleaners to forego the submission of an additional $1,000.00 to
cover oversight expenses. Sparkle Cleaners is making this request
for the following reasons:
* The project has been completed;
The report (included with this correspondence) has been
completed;
Remaining overview will not likely exceed the amount
remaining, in the account;
Sparkle Cleaners will pay upon submission of an invoice
any charges in excess of the original contract.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
respond to this request in a timely fashion so that
Cleaners will not be forced into the State program.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILSON & ASSOCIATES
Philip ~GoalWin,, R.G. #4779
Principal Hydrogeologist
cc: Susan Gonzales
Kindly
.Sparkle
1~'01 WESTVVlNID OF:lIVE · SUITE 113 ? I::IAKEI~-~:~::IEL[D, CA ~.~01
(805] 323~480 · FAX (8(D5] 323~723
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
SITE ASSESSMENT STUDY AT
SPARKLE CLEANERS
121 MONTEREY STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
PRESENTED TO;
MR. MIKE DANIELS
PRESENTED BY;
WILSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APRIL, 1990
1701 WESTVVINO DRIVE · SLIITE 113 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
[805] 323-6460 · FAX (805] 393-4723
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Executive S~mmary
Background
Assessment Activities
Analytical Results
Site Geology
Conclusions
Recommendations
Limitations
Signatures
Table of Contents
~age
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
5
5
Exhibits 1
Table 1
Appendix A
Appendix B
Zaps
LUFT RiskAnalysis
Boring Log
Analytical Results
1.0 Executive Summary
Sparkle Cleaners contracted with Wilson & Associates, Inc. to
perform additional site characterization at the Sparkle Cleaners
Site, 121 Monterey Street, Bakersfield, California (Exhibit 1).
This assessment was focused on the area where a gasoline product
line had evidence of rupture during a tank removal operation and
subsequent laboratory analysis confirmed soil impaction. A
followup site assessment delineated the lateral limits of
impaction, however, the vertical limit remained to be found. This
assessment included a slant vertical assessment soil boring, sample'
collection, and analyses for fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline, and the
· gasoline constituent volatile aromatics.
.On April 19, 1990 three soil samples were submitted to National
Toxicology Laboratory for analysis using EPA Methods 3810 (purge
and trap for gasoline), and 8020 (BTEX). Analytical results did
not detect any of these compounds at or above the stated detection
limits from the sample depths of 40,52.5, and 65 feet,
respectively.. A previous soil boring had detected fuel
hydrocarbons 'at a maximum concentration of 20,601 mg/kg at a depth
of 20 feet, decreasing to 5,238 mg/kg at a depth of 30 feet. The
vertical and lateral limits of fuel hydrocarbons in the soil have
been delineated. They describe a plume .of impacted soil from the
western end of the former dispenser island extending 20 feet to the
west by 10 feet to both the north and the south, and confined to
the upper 35 feet of sediments. This corresponds tO a volume of
approximately 520 cubic yards.
The depth of the water table in the area is estimated at 135 feet
(Water Supply Report, Kern County Water Agency, May 1989). ,No
groundwater was encountered in the boring, advanced for this
assessment, which penetrated to a maximum depth of 66 feet below
the surface. The alluvial Quaternary sediments that were
encountered by the boring was comprised of a 9 foot section of fine
grained sands overlying a 21 foot sequence of fine- to medium-
grained sands underlain by 17 feet of silts with minor clay above
19 feet of clay to the deepest depth penetrated in the boring.
Given this site characteristics a score of 49 for the LUFT Manual
gasoline leaching potential risk analysis is interpreted. This
corresponds to a low potential of leaching to groundwater. Due to
the substantial impermeable clay and the depth to groundwater no
remedial, action is required. The no action alternative is
recommended for this site.
2.0 Background
Sparkle Cleaners is located at 121 Monterey Street, Bakersfield,
Kern County, California (Exhibit 1). The former underground storage
tanks were located south of Monterey Street and one half mile east
of Union Avenue (Exhibit 1). In August 11, 1988, McNabb
Construction of Bakersfield removed two 10,000 gallon underground
gasoline storage tanks and associated piping. B.C. Laboratories,
Inc. of Bakersfield collected eight samples from the excavation and
dispenser area and analyzed these samples for total petroleum
hydrocarbons, and volatile aromatics (BTX). Laboratory results
indicated "none detected" concentrations in the vicinity of the
tank excavation. However, elevated concentrations increasing with
depth were indicated at the west end of the dispenser island, and
the adjacent product line. Discolored soil had been observed along
the product line just west of the dispensers island, Additionally,
a section of piping had evidence of a very small hole.
Subsequently, two extendahoe borings were advanced to 13-1/2' just
west of the dispenser island which is beneath an overhanging
canopy. Elevated concentrations of gasoline and gasoline
constituent volatile aromatics were indicated in laboratory
analysis from these borings. Three more borings, TH-l, TH-2 and
TH-3 were advanced in November of 1989 just to the west of the
overhanging canopy. Borings TH-1 and TH-3 had low concentrations
and defined the lateral limit of impacted soil (Exhibit 2). Boring
TH-2 was slant drilled to the east toward the dispenser island and
had elevated concentrations to the drilled depth of 30 feet.
Drilling refusal was experienced at this depth. The vertical limit
of elevated concentrations remained to be assessed.
Sparkle Cleaners contracted with Wilson & Associates, Inc. to
implement further site characterization and prepare this report.
3.0 Assessment Activities
Field activities for this phase included a soil boring on April 8,
1990, to assess the vertical extent of soil impaction (Exhibit 2).
· The soil boring was advanced with a top hole location 20 feet west
of the former dispenser location, and slant drilled 12 degrees to
the east with a bottom hole location 7 feet to the west of the
dispenser location to a depth of 66 feet.
3.1 Boring Methods
The boring was advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 rig with 8-inch
hollow stem continuous flight augers in accordance with ASTM Method
D1452-80 for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. The
augers were steam cleaned prior to drilling the boring.
The lithology and other pertinent data was recorded on a field
boring log in accordance with ASTM Method D2488-84 for visual
description and identification of soils.
3.2 Soil Sampling
Soil samples were Collected through the auger in 2-inch diame{er
brass sleeves placed in a split spoon sampler and driven into the
soil using a 140 pound hammer with .a 30-inch drop in accordance
with ASTM Methods D1586-84 for split-barrel sampling'of soil and
D1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves
and sampler were cleaned and rinsed using a low-phosphate detergent
solution followed by immersion in deionized water rinse prior to
each use.
Soil samples were driven at the depths of 40,52.5, and 65 feet in
the boring. The blow counts, recovery, and lithology were recorded
on the field log (Appendix A). Lithology was described in
accordance with ASTM procedure D2488-84 (Standard Practice for
Description and Identification of Soils).. One brass sleeve with
soil from each interval was capped, sealed, labeled in accordance
with EPA protocols, recorded on a Chain of Custody Form, placed in
a cooler at 4 degrees centigrade or less, and transported to
National Toxicology Laboratory with the Chain of Custody for the
specified analysis.
3.3 Field Screening of Soil Samples
Soil samples were collected using three six-inch brass tubes
installed inside a split-spoon sampler. The middle sample tube was
immediately capped and stored in an iced cooler upon collection.
The bottom tube was used for lithologic description, and the top
tube was used for field screening. The material form the top tube
was capped at approximately 50 percent capacity. A headspace
reading was collected at this time, and noted on the boring log.
4.0 Analytical Results
The soil samples were analyzed by National Toxicology Laboratory,
a state certified laboratory, for fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline by
EPA Method 3810 (purge and trap for gasoline), and the gasoline
constituent volatile aromatics benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and
total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020. Analytical results did
not detect any of these compounds at the sample depths of 40, 52.5,
and 65 feet. The previous vertical delineating boring had detected
fuel hydrocarbons at a maximum concentration of 20,601 mg/~g at a
depth of 20 feet, decreasing to 5,238 mg/kg at a depth of 30'feet.
Drilling was terminated at that time due to drilling refusual.
Analytical data are included in Appendix B along with laboratory
analytical data summary sheet.
Table 1 presents a LUFT Manual gasoline leaching potential risk
analysis. Wilson & Associates estimates the score to be 49 points
which corresponds to a low potential of leaching to groundwater.
5.0 Site Geology
The sediments underlying the site are Quaternary alluvial deposits
which consist of unconsolidated, clays, silts, sands, and gravels
(calif. Div. of Mines and Geol., 1971). The depth to groundwater
is estimated at approximately 135 feet below the ground surface
(Water Supply Report, Kern County Water Agency, May 1989). The
alluvial Quaternary sediments were comprised of a 9 foot sequence
of fine grained sands underlain by 21 feet of fine-to medium-
grained sands overlying 17 feet of silts above 19 feet of clay to
the deepest depth penetrated in the boring.
6.0 Conclusions
Concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline and gasoline
constituent volatile aromatics were detected to a depth of 35 feet.
These concentrations dropped off rapidly below that' depth.
Groundwater is anticipated at a depth of 135 feet. Boring TH-4
encountered 36 feet of clayey silt and clay from depths of 39 feet
to 66 feet (the deepest depth penetrated in this assessment). For
these reasons the site receives a score of 49 for the LUFT Manual
gasoline leaching potential risk analysis, which corresponds to a
low potential.of leaching to groundwater.
7.0 Recommendations
The substantial impermeable clay and the depth to groundwater deems
that no remedial measures are necessary. Based upon the results of
the investigation three alternative courses of action are
presented; excavation and disposal, in-situ treatment, or no
action.
The impacted soil could be excavated and disposed of at a solid
waste facility. The impacted soil lies beneath a canopy structure.
For this reason excavation is not recommended.
The limited extent of impaction and the apparent high
permeabilities of the gasoline impacted sands at the site lend
themselves to a vapor extraction system. However, the substantial
impermeable clay and the depth to groundwater does not lead Wilson
& Associates to recommend this alternative.
The no action alternative is appropriate if the concentration
present iow risk to health and the environment as prescribed by
federal, state, and local regulations. This site presents that
low risk of leaching to groundwater. The no action alternative is
recommended at this site.
8.0 Limitations
Wilson & Associates performed this investigation in accordance with
generally accepted standards of care which exist in Central
California at this time. It should be recognized that definition
and evaluation of geologic conditions is a difficult and inexact
art. Judgments leading to conclusions and recommendations are
generally made with limited knowledge of the subsurface conditions
present. No warranty expressed or implied, is made.
This Report of Findings was prepared by: /~w.~
~~ \%X NO. 4892 /~/
Mark Magargee, 'R'G. #4892 .'~,'~>~~~O~kL\¥~
Senior Hydrogeologist "
Registration Expires 6/30/90 '~..:. ~
This Report of Findings was prepared under the supervision of:
Principal Hydrogeologist
Registration Expires 6/30/90
This Report of Findings was reviewed by:
Jo~ .R. Wilson P.E. #23270
P~i~clpal Engineer
R~q~stration Expires 12/31/93
LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS FOR GAS~I~INE
USING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) AND
BENZENE, TOLUENE, XYLENE AND ETHYLBENZENE (BTX&E)
S SCORE S SCORE S SCORE
SITE C 10 PTS. C 9 PTS. C 5 PTS.
FEATURE O [F CON- O IF CON- O IF (~ON-
R DITION R DITION R DITION
E IS MET E IS MBT E IS MET
Minimum Depth to > 100.~ 51-100 25-50kl
Ground Water from the
Soil Sample (feet) -
Fractures in subsurface None Unknown Present
(applies to foothills
,or mountain areas) 10
Average Annual < 10 10-25 26-40\2
Precipitation (inches)
Man-made conduits which None Unknown Present
increase vertical
. migration of leachate
Unique site features: None At least More than
recharge ~ea, coarse ] {~ , one one
soil, nearby wells, etc.
co,.u N qO + c/+ O _- qc/
RANGE TOTAL PTS. 49 pts. or more 41 - 48 pts. '40 pts. or less
MAX. ALLOW~LE X/50/50/50 .31.31VV NA\3
BTXE LEVELS' (PPM)
MAX. At.I.OWABt F. 1000 100 10
TPH LEVELS (PPM)
If depth is greater than 5 ft..and less than 25 ft., score 0 points.
If depth is 5 ft. or less, this table should not be used.
If precipitation is over 40 inches, score 0 points.
Levels for BTX&E are not applicable at a TPH concentration of 10:. ppm.
APPENDIX A
7
CONSTRUCTION "' o ,
.,! .... i '-
"' '1 I t.i
I
I I
I
I
..... ~" !,,, ~ I
i ] i 'i. I, '"'., j l
I i ii
I t .....
I I ...! I ~
I i I 'l ...i ii .....
~ "i ~ i i"il
ii~ . . i 'l i,~.i'!
I I .i, '.i i'" il .. .>".~/
i .. i i.. I ~ .!~ .,
I i I I ! II
i ! I i I ii
i I I i' . ! i'! ,,
i i ! i ! Il. ..
I "I I 'i I
' -" "' ' ',,'I
iI i I '-"11 ,-~.,' ~'.~.' ~ ~.,....,~..,.,~ o~',,,~.
~ ,.,, , 'l.' ...... ! ..'i'i - ~' .,
'" I I..:'.'i
I' ' " .
" .i .,i, -
I .... · , i ".
I I. 'i I ,~....,,'~, ~ ,..,.,~..,*:,. -
i ,I ,,1 i,,, ..~
i I I I
, ,1 ,,.
~o/o~/.~/'.*/,~,,,... <:~.~;~.,c.~-//"/<b...~' ..~r~. ~"; //~"': ///*/Y'~"'&'//"~"~"'"'2"'~'a'~'/'Z"'u DATE
, , i,,,i
I i I !
I I I I i ii
.~ i i .i "i ii ,,,
I I I I i Ii
I I I I I
I I i i . I ~,,..,..,~,~,/..-'~.,.~.~.' ~' ~',.-,,~ ...~,/". ,~",'-V, .
I I I I I {I ~'~-.~..,~'~ ~ ~"~.~. ~.~,-,~ ~'-~
i i i i ! ii ~' ~ '" ~
· I I i 'i I ii
I I i I I Ii ,
i i i ,I i ii. ,,.
i I i I I i'1
i I 'i 'l,, ..~ '
I .,, ' I- I I
i ~ i-. I I ! ....
' I I
I
' , ~
I ! i '1 i
I ...., ., I I ~"
DATE
LOG of. BORING
TI--t --
'~ I , '",',
i ~ ,,~ i ~ ~ ..
'"~i I I
I 'i I I I'
"~ 'i m I i
~ I .~ ~ ,,I !1,
.l t ~ ~. ....
i .... i ;.i .! ....
i ..I
I -
, .....
~ .~ ,,-
· - LOG of. BORING
APPENDIX B
Noat. ional
xlcology
Laboratories
1100 California Ave. Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Thomas C. Sneath, B.S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY REPORT
A'ttention:
Mark Magargee
Project: ~88134 Sparkle Clean.
Sample ID: 040990D-$
Date Extracted: n/a
Date Received: 09-Apr-90
Test Requested: TPH as Gasoline
Date Analyzed: lO-Apr-90
Date Reported lO-Apr-90
Test Method: Calif. DOHS Method
Type of Sample: Soil
Date Collected: OB-Apr-90
Basis: As Received
Sample DeScrip:
Data Release
Constituent
403
Reporting
Units
Minimum
Analysis Reporting
Results Level
Total PetroleUm Hydro-
carbon as Gasoline
ug/gm None Detected 5.00
CommentS:
California D.O.H.S.
Cert.
'~225
.National
loxlcol°gy
Laboratories
1100 California Ave.
Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Thomas C. Sneath, B.S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY
Attention: Mark Magargee
Sample ID: O4099OD-$
Date ReCeived: 09-Apr-90
Date Analyzed: lO-Apr-90
Date Reported lO-Apr-90
Date Collected: 08-Apr-90.'
Sample Descrip: 403
REPORT
Project: ~88134 Sparkle Cleane
Date Extracted: n/a
Test Requested: BTX & E
Test Method: Modified 8020
Type of Sample: Soil
Basis: As Received
Dilution Factor:
Data Release
Constituent
Benzene:
Toluene:
Ethylbenzene:
Total Xylenes:.
Authorized:
Reporting AnalySis
Units Results
ug/gm NOne Detected
ug/gm None Detected
ug/gm None Detected
ug/gm None Detected
Minimum
Reporting
Level
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~225
Noat. ional
xlcology
Laboratories
1100 California Ave. Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Thomas C. Sneath, B~S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY
Attention: Mark Magargee
Sample ID: 040990D-1
Date Received: 09-Apr-90
Date Analyzed: lO-Apr-90
Date Reported lO-Apr-90
Date Collected: 08-Apr-90
Sample Descrip: 401
REPORT
Project: ~88154 Sparkle Clean.
Date Extracted: n/a
Test Requested: TPH as Gasoline
Test Method: Calif. DOHS Method
Type of Sample: Soil
Basis: As Received
Data Release Authorized:
Constituent
Total Petroleum Hydro-
carbon as Gasoline
Reporting Analysis
Units Results
Minimum
Reporting
Level
ug/gm None Detected 5.00
Comments:
California D.O.H.S.
Cert..
~225
Noat. ional
xlcology
Laboratories
1100 California Ave. Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES. INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
'Thomas C. Sneath, B.S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY
~ttention: Mark Magargee
Sample ID: 040990D-1
Date Received: 09-Apr-90
Date Analyzed: lO-Apr-90
Date Reported iO-Apr790
Date Coilected: 08-APr-90
Sample Descrip: 401
REPORT
Project: ~88154 Sparkle Cleane
Date Extracted: n/a
Test Requested: 8TX & E
/est Method: Modified 8020
Type of Sample: Soil
Basis: As Received
Dilution Factor:
Data Release
Constituent
Authorized:
"F'-- /i/ /
Reporting
Units
Benzene:' ug/gm
Toluene: ug/gm
Ethylbenzene: ug/gm
Total Xylenes: ug/gm
Minimum
Analysis Reporting
Results Level
None Detected 0.05
None Detected 0.05
None Detected 0.05
None'Detected 0.05
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~225
iNoat, ional
x ,col
L,ogy
aboratories
1100 Califomia Ave.
Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Thomas C. Sneath, B.S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY REPORT
~'ttention':
Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Reported
Date Collected:
Mark Magargee
040990D-2
09-Apr-90
lO-Apr-90
lO-Apr-90
Project: ~8B154 Sparkle Clean.
Date Extracted: n/a'
Test Requested: TPH as Gasoline
Test Method: Calif. DOHS Method
Type of Sample: Soil
Basis: As Received
S~mple Descrip: 402
Data Release
Constituent
Authorized:/_~/~ '/~/ ¢/
Repo rti ng
Units
Minimum
Analysis Reporting
Results Level
Total PetroleUm Hydro-
carbon as Gasoline
ug/gm
None Detected 5.OO
Comments:
California D.O.H.S.
Cert.
~225
oat. ional
xlcologY
Laboratories
1100 California Ave. Bakersfield, California 93304
AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES. INC.
805 / 322-4250 800 ! 350-3515
Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Thomas C. Sneath, B.S.
Chief Toxicologist
FAX 805 / 322-4322
LABORATORY REPORT
Attention: Mark Magargee Project: ~88134 Sparkle.Cleane
Sample ID: 040990D-2 Date Extracted: n/a
Date Received: 09-Apr-90 Test Requested: BTX & E
Date Analyzed: lO-Apr-90 Test Method: Modified 8020
Date Reported lO-Apr-90 Type of Sample: Soil
Date. Collected: OB-Apr-90 Basis: As Received
Sample.Desccip: 402 Dilution Factor:
Data Release
Constituent
Authorized:
/
Reporting Analysis
Units Results
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene: ug/gm None Detected 0.05
Toluene: ug/gm None Detected 0.05
Ethylbenzene: ug/gm None Detected 0.05
Total Xylenes: ug/gm None Detected 0.05
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert.'~225
GARV'J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 661-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOUR
AG
EN
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopier (805) 861-3429
CY
April 10, 1990
Mr. Mike Daniels
Richard K. Newman and
c/o Sparkle Cleaners
121 MontereY Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Associates
SUBJECT:
Location: 121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Known As: Sparkle Cleaners
PERMIT #: 140006
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that, as the responsible party for the
property described above, your agreement with the Kern County Environmental Health
Services Department is about to expire. In accordance with Section d.2. of that
agreement which states:
"Seventeen (17) hours of billable time has been reached. This will give notice that the available funds will be exhausted after
five (5) additional hours of billable time at which time. the agreement will expire. A statement estimating the amount time
necessary to complete any remaining oversight work will be sent. The responsible party will then have another opportunity to
renew their agreement with the County.
Failure to enter into another agreement shall require Kern County Environmental Health to utilize the State Water Resources
Control Board Pilot Project for which the responsible party may be billed by the State directly for the cost of County services
as well as State costs."
You are hereby notified that the current balance in your trust account is $ 171.62 .
Remaining oversight will require an estimated 8 hours to complete. We are,
therefore, extending this opportunity to renew your agreement with Kern County
Environmental Health or to utilize 'the State. Water Resources Control Board Pilot
Project for completion of the required oversight activities.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating to the
above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California
Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8-.48 require
a determination of the threat to the environment as a result of this release.
The cost incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oversight of the work
for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site
remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits.
These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two methods
described below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost
recovery under the terms of (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement
Option. These options only pertain to costs associated with oversight.
(A) STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provide§ a mechanism for the
State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the
necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State
contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs
incurred by the County and the State, pertaining to your site, under the State terms
explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state
agency administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the
direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action al the above site are funded, in whole or in part, from the
Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(les) have been identified as the party or parties
responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the
Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Parly or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all
direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground
storage tank site, and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt of a
detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
(B)
COUNTY OF KERN LOCAL AGREEMENT OPTION
Kern County Environmental Health is providing this option for those who prefer to pay
the County directly and avoid the addition of .State costs. Prior to the. County's
performance of services, this option requires your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand
dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for
County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party
must enter into a County agreement, attachment "B".
The environmental sensitivity (attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by
Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for groundwater contamination.
Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local
Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area
and may be enrolled in the Local Agreement Option~ however, the County of Kern reserves
the right to cancel any Local Agreement Option, should it be discovered that
groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition exists. In
such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County
oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this ri'ght for any site even when
the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area.
It is necessary for you to respond, in writing, within ten (10) calendar days of
receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice:
either the State contract or the County's Local Agreement Option. If you select the
County's Local Agreement, please complete and sign the Local Agreement,~(attachment
B), and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) m~de payable
to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street,
Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Accounting - Local Agreement Option.
If you select the State contract, please indicate, in writing, that you have made this
selection and that you have read the above official notification.
Failure to respond within ten (107 calendar days to this notice will automatically
result in oversight cost recovery tor your site(s) to be placed under the terms of the
State contract for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, Please contact Susan Gonzales
at (805) 861-3636.
Steve McCgq~Yey, Di rector
Environmental Health Servi
ces Department
attachments
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOURCE
March 8, 1990
2700 M Street, Suite
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Subject: Underground Tank Site Assessment, Sparkle Cleaners, 121 Monterey
Street, Bakersfield, CA
Permit No.: 140006
Dear Mr. Daniels:
We have reviewed the "Added Wo~kplan for Further Site Characterization"
prepared by Wilson and Associates for the subject site. Wilson and Associates has
satisfactorily responded to our questions regarding the samples to be analyzed and
the laboratory that will do the analysis. Accordingly, approval of the workplan
is granted.
Per telephone conversation with Mr. Mark Magargee with Wilson and Associates,
the workplan was scheduled to be implemented on March 18, 1990. Please notify this
office at least 48 hours of any changes on the workplan or this schedule.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-
3636.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: John Wilson / Wilson and Associates
\140006.1tr
~]ILSON & ~
.ZlS~n_rl~lTE
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
Addended Workplan For Further
Site Characterization
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, California
Presented To:
Sparkle Cleaners
Presented By:
Wilson & Associates, Inc.'
March, 1990
PhiliP Goalwin
Senior Hydrogeologist
1701 WESTVVINO O~IIVE · SL_IITI~ 113 · BAKI~RSF~ELO, CA 93301
I805) 323°6460 · FAX [805) 323-4723
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Sparkle Cleaners has authorized Wilson & Associates, Inc. to
prepare this addended workplan for further site characterization at
the Sparkle Cleaners site located at 121 Monterey Street,
Bakersfield, California. The Kern County Department of
Environmental Health Services (County) is the lead regulatgry
agency.
1.1 PURPOSE
The site characterization described in this workplan has the
following objectives:
Further assess the lateral and vertical extent
of on-site vadose zone contamination involving
gasoline.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of services described in the Workplan include:
Locating underground utilities using Sparkle
Cleaners as-build drawings (if available) as well
as Under-ground Service Alert (U.S.A.);
Advancing one soii boring through the center of the
former dispenser location;
The boring will be advanced to a maximum depth of
sixty-five feet;
Steam cleaning of
equipment prior to
contamination;
all drilling and sampling
boring to avoid cross-
Collecting soil samples at depth to be evaluated in
the field. Initially, samples will be collected at
approximately five foot intervals beginning at five
feet and continuing until 65 feet. The samples
will be collected using a standard California
split-spoon sampler equipped with brass tubes,
steam cleaned prior to use. These samples will be
field screened and two selected samples will be
chosen for chemical analyses;
Soil samples collected for chemical analysis wil~i~
be collected in brass tub~s and sealed with
aluminum foil, end caps and tape. The sealed tubes
will be placed in a cooler with blue-ice and
2
transported to a DHS certified laboratory under
chain-of-custody procedures;
Analysis of the two selected soil samples for fuel
hydrocarbons as gasoline and gasoline constituent
volatile aromatics (BTEX) using EPA methods 8015
Modified and 8020, respectively;
Prepare field boring logs;
Prepare a written report summarizing the results of
the investigation with conclusions and
recommendations. The report will be certified by a
California Registered Geologist or Civil Engineer.
1.3 Schedule
Wilson & Assoicates, Inc. anticipates beginning work described
herein within one week upon approval from the County and
authorization to proceed from Sparkle Cleaners. The soil boring
can be drilled and sampled in approximately one working day. The
analytical data will be reported within three weeks and the report
will be completed within two weeks after receipt of the analytical
results.
2.0 Background
Sparkle Cleaners is located at 121 Monterey Street, Bakersfield,
California as shown on Exhibit 1.
2.1 Facility Description
The facility is shown to scale on Exhibit 2.
occupied by a dry cleaning services Company.
The facility is
2.2 Project History
In August 11, 1988, McNabb Construction of Bakersfield removed two
10,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tanks and associated
piping. B.C. Laboratories, Inc. of Bakersfield collected eight
samples from the excavation and dispenser area and analyzed these
samples for total petroleum hydrocarbons, and volatile aromatics
(BTX). Laboratory results indicated "none detected" concentrations
in the vicinity of the tank excavation and product lines, however,
elevated concentrations increasing with depth were indicated Wt. the
west end of the dispenser island.
3
Subsequently, two extendahoe backhoe borings were advanced to 13-
1/2' at the dispenser island which is beneath an overhanging
canopy. Elevated concentrations of gasoline and gasoline
constituent volatile aromatics were indicated in laboratory
analysis from these borings. Three additional borings were
advanced in November of 1989. Borings TH1 and TH3 had low
concentrations and define the lateral limit (Exhibit 2). Boring
TH2 had elevated concentrations to the drilled depth of 30 feet.
The vertical limit of elevated concentrations remains to be
assessed.
Sparkle Cleaners contracted with WilsOn & Associates, Inc. to
prepare this workplan and implement further site characterization.
3.0 Work Plan
Wilson & Associates, Inc. proposes to assess
vertical extent of contaminants in the soil.
and define the
3.1 Soil Boring Depth and Location
The soil boring .will be drilled through the cobble sediments to a
depth of 65 feet. Soil samples will be collected at five foot
intervals beginning at five ~feet.
The proposed location is shown on Exhibit 2A. The location has
been chosen to vertical definition in the vadose zone. Testhole 4
(TH4) will be advanced through the center of the previous dispenser.
area. Because of the overhanging canopy, the boring will be
advanced by slant drilling at a 10° angle from vertical. In this
way the'drilling rig mast will be outside the canopy, while bottom
hole location will be directly beneath the dispenser location at a
depth of 65 feet.
4.0 Methods
The following sections will describe in detail the methods to be
employed in implementing this workplan.
4.1 Boring Methods
The borings will be advanced using a Mobile Drill B-50 rig, or
equivalent, with a six inch or larger hollow stem continuous flight
auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 1452-80 for~.soil
investigations and sampling by auger borings. The augers will be
steam cleaned prior to drilling each boring. The lithology and
other pertinent data will be recorded on a field boring log in
4
accordance with Method D 2488-84 for visual description and
identification of soils.
Cuttings and other spoil from the borings will placed in
appropriate D.O.T. approved 55-gallon drums until verified, with
analytical results, whether or not the soil is contaminated. If
the material is contaminated, a written plan will be submitted by
the facility operator to the County for their approval before
treatment and/or disposal occurs. Disposal will be the
responsibility of the Facility operatOr and occur within 90 days of
completion of drilling.
Back filling of any boring or part there of, will occur by pouring
a bentonite cement slurry through the auger.
4.2 Soil Sampling
Soil samples will be collected through the auger in 2-inch brass
sleeves driven in a split spoon sampler by a 140 pound hammer with
a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D1586-84 for split-
barrel sampling of soil and D1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling
of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler will be steam cleaned
prior to each use.
Soil samples will be driven at depths of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35,
40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 65 feet in the boring. The blow Counts,
recovery, and lithology will be recorded on the field logs.
Lithology will be described in accordance with ASTM procedure
D2488-84 (Standard Practice for Descrip%ion and Identification of
Soils). One brass sleeve with soil from each interval will be
capped, sealed, labeled in accordance with EPA protocols, recorded
on a chain of custody form, placed in a cooler at 4° centigrade or
less, and transported to a California Certified Laboratory with the
chain of custody for the specified analyses.
4.3 Soil Analyses
The soil samples will be analyzed by BC Analytical Laboratories, a
California State Certified Laboratory in accordance with state
guidelines and EPA protocols. The samples will'be analyzed for
fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, and
using EPA methods 8015 modified and 8020, respectively.
4.4 Field Screening of Soil Samples ~
Soil samples will be collected using three six-inch brass t6bes
installed inside a split-spoon sampler. The middle sample tube
will be immediately capped and stored in an iced cooler upon
collection. The bottom tube will be used for lithologic
description, and the top tube will be used for field screening.
The material from the top tube will be placed, in mason jar to
approximately 50 percent capacity, shaken, and stored for a period
of 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at
this time and noted on the boring log. Two samples will be
selected for laboratory, analysis. One sample will be from the
bottom of the boring at 65 feet. The other will be the deepest
soil sample that field screens as having possible elevated'
concentrations.
5.0 Quality Assurance Plan
This section described field and analytical quality-assurance
procedures to be followed during the investigation and remediation.
5.1 Sample Collection and Handling Protocol
Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure
quality of data obtained from a sample. Each sample therefore will
be collected in a brass tube, preserved correctly for the intended
analysis and stored for no longer than permissible holding time
prior to analysis. Protocol to be applied in this project is
described in section 4.
5.2 Sample Identification and Chain of Custody Protocol
Sample identification ~nd Chain of Custody procedures are designed
to assure sample quality and to document sample possession from the
time it is collected to the time of its ultimate disposal. The
container for each sample submitted for analysis will have a label
affixed with the identifying number or the number will be inscribed
directly on the container of feasible. The analytical laboratory
will assign a separate sample number unique to that sample for
internal sample coordination and identification. A description of
the sample including the sample number and other pertinent
information regarding its collection and/or geologic significance
will be written in field notes and/or a geologic boring log being
prepared by the site geologist. These field documents will be kept
in a permanent project file. All sample will be analyzed by a
state certified laboratory for the analyses requested.
A properly completed Chain of Custody Form will be submitted to the
analytical laboratory along with sample..The laboratory's assigned
number will be properly entered on the form. A quality control
officer at the lab will verify integrity of sample submitted,
proper sample volume correctness of containers used, and properly
executed Chain of Custody Form. Pertinent information~ Will be
entered into a log book kept by the laboratory.
5.3 Analytical Quality Assurance
In addition to routine calibration of analytical instruments with
standards and blanks, the analyst is required to run dupliCates and
spikes on 10 percent of analyses to assure an added measure of
reliability and preciSion. Accuracy is verified throUgh the
following:
1. U.S. EPA and State certification of results;
Participation in inter-laboratory round robin
program;
"Blind" samples are submitted for analysis by
the quality control officer on a weekly basis.
These are prepared from National Bureau of
Standards specifications of EPA reference
standards;
Verification of results with an alternative
method.
6.0 Site Safety Plan
Appendix A contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with'Worker
Right to Know Regulations and CAC Title 26.
7
"' 24 ;." ""
18",,
noO
~ · OnQ~
'..2
FOUR
HO$1.JII
Jl
EXHIBIT
V1CINITY
1
MAP
MONTEREY
. \~~,¢~._.~o~-_~t .¢,~ ~
EXHIBIT 2
SITE LAYOUT
MAP
EXHIBIT 2A
BORING' LOCATION MAP
APPENDIX A
SITE SAFETY PLAN
Introduction: ~
A site Safety Plan (SSP) has been designed to address safety
provisions needed during the site soil assessment/remediation. Its
purpose is to provide established procedures to protect all on-site
personnel from direct skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion of
potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered at the
site. The SSP establishes personnel responsibilities, personal
protective equipment standards decontamination procedures, and
emergency action plans.
Wilson & Associates, Inc. seeks to enter property described above
of the purpose of conducting a site assessment consisting of up to
four (4) borings to evaluate the extent of soil impaction.
Soils samples 'will be collected at five-foot intervals during
exploratory drilling using a California modified spirit-spoon
sampler through a hollow-stem auger. All possible efforts will be
made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to be chemically
analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined
plastic lids, sealed with tape, and placed on ice in a cooler
immediately. All Chain of Custody protocol will be followed.
Drilling equipment will be brought to the site and operated by a
subcontractor:
Melton Drilling
'7101 Downing Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93308
C-57 License Number 508270
The SSP described means for protecting all on-site personnel from
deleterious contamination or personal injury while conducting on-
site activities. As described below we will meet all requirements
promulgated by the California Department of Health Services.
Site Background:
This property is an dry cleaning service located at 121 Monterey
Street, Bakersfield, California.
The facility previously contained two-10,000 underground gasoline
storage tanks and associated piping.
Responsibilities of Key Personnel:
Ail personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mr.
Mark Magargee of Wilson & Associates, Inc. will serve as Project
Manager and On-Site Geologist. He will also serve as Site Safety
Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Magargee will assure that on-site
personnel have received a copy of SSP. Personnel will be required
to document their full understanding of the SSP before admission to
the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all times
by the SSO. Appropriate personal Protective equipment, listed
below, will conduct a training session to assure that all are aware
of safe work practices. In the training session, personnel will be
made aWare of hazards at the site and will utilize Material Safety
Date Sheets for information on compounds to be encountered.
Mr. Mark Magargee will also be responsible for keeping field notes,
collecting and securing samples, and assuring sample integrity by
adherence to Chain of Custody protocol.
On-site employees will take reasonable precautions to avoid
unforeseen hazards. After documenting .understanding of the SSP,
each on-site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to
all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be
reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held
responsible to perform only those tasks for which they belie~ei~hey
are qualified for. ~
Provisions if this SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with
on-site activities will adhere strictly hereto.
Job Hazard Analysis:
Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include those commonly
encountered~when operating any mechanical equipment, such as the
danger of falling objects or moving machinery.
Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with
operating such equipment.
A drilling contractor has been employed to deliver and operate al1
drilling equipment. Qualified personnel only will have any contact
with this equipment. All on-site personnel, including the drilling
contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when
in close proximity to drilling equipment. Latex gloves will be
worn by persons collected or handling samples to prevent exposure
to contaminants. Gloves will be changed between samples, and used
ones discarded, to avoid cross-contamination. Proper respiratory
equipment will be worn if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed
action levels as determined using PID. Action levels requiring
respiratory apparatus will be 5 ppm, in the breathing space.
9
Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame, or sparks will be
permitted in order to prevent accidental ignition.
Risk Assessment Summary:
Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel,
and benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent
a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most
are highly flammable. Threshold Limit Values (TLr's), Short Term
Exposure Limits (STEL's), and Toxicity'levels (LD50, oral-rat), all
in mg/kg (ppm), are listed below:
Compound TLV STEL Toxicity
Gasoline 200 300 ....
Diesel 50 75
Benzenes 10 25 4894
Toluene 100 150 5000
Xylene 100 150 4300
Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard.
Exposure Monitoring Plan:
A Photo-Ionization Detector (PID) will be used to monitor vapor
concentrations .around the site. Should concentrations exceed
TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges
will be placed in downwind locations if PID reading indicate high
levels of volatile organics in the breathing space.
Personal Protective Equipment:
Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with organic
vapor cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site
as needed. When handling samples, the on-site geologist will wear
latex gloves. Hard hats will.be worn by all personnel on-site when
in proximity of drilling equipment.
Work Zones and Security Measures:
Access to the site will be restricted to authorized~personnel. A
set of cones, placards, or wide yellow tape, surrounding the site
will define the perimeter. The Project Manager will be responsible
for site security.
10
Decontamination Measures:
Avoidance of contamination whenever possible is the best method for
protection. Common sense dictates that on-site personnel avoid
sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possibly contaminated
soil.
Ail personnel will be'advised to wash their hands, neck, and face
with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site.
Respirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's
use.
Drilling and sampling 'equipment used will be decontaminated by
steam-cleaning, Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before
each sample is taken and drilling equipment will be decontaminated
before each boring is commenced.
General Safe Work Practices:.
Drillers and other on-site personnel will be briefed each day in
"tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used.
Anticipated contaminants and emergency, procedures will be reviewed.
Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and
verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit.
Drilling and sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before.being
brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be steam-
cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between
borings.
The On-Site Geologist will oversee operations and log borings in
consultation with drillers. The Sample Coordinator will assure
that proper protocol is used at all times in collecting and
handling samples.
Training Requirements:
The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include
all points of MSDS forms, contaminant properties, warning signs,
health hazard data, risk from exposure, and emergency first aid.
All chemiCals to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone
fully understands site hazards.
Medical Surveillance Program:.
According to CFR 29, 1910.120, Paragraph (f), employees who wear
respirators 30 days or more during .one year or who have been
11
exposed to hazardous substances or health hazards above established
permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically.
all site personnel will be required to have had a complete chemical
physical within the past year.
Record Keeping:
Documentation will be kept on personnel exposed to contaminant
hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will
include documentation that employees have received training on the
SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms, and all emergency
procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training
meeting.
Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet
requirements. Included will be names and social security number of
employees, medical evaluation, on-the-job logs from entry to exit,
first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons, and
personal air monitoring records.
Contingency Plans:
· In the event of accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project
'Director, Senior Project Manager, or other person will notify
appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows:
1. Kern County Department of Environmental
Health Services
2700 "M" Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
Ms. Dolores~ugh
(805)836-226~
2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance emergency 911
3. Nearest Emergency Hospital:
Memorial Hospital
420 '34th Street
Bakersfield, California
(805)327-1792
12
Kern County Department of Environmental
Health Services
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
RE: Sparkle Cleaners/Bakersfield
Dear Ms. Delores Gough;
.Please be informed that'Wilson and Associates intends to mobilize
to the site to conduct field operations described in the workplan
at 8:00 AM on Sunday, March 18, 1990. We anticipate one day of
field activities. We have contracted with Earthtec Limited to
provide a B-53 drill rig and crew. Please see the attached
drillers registration form and information. If there are any
changes in this schedule we will immediately be in contact with
your office.
Sincerely,
WILSONAND ASSOCIATES
Mark R. Magargee
Senior Hydrogeologist
cc. Mike Daniel
1701 WESTVVINO E)I~IVE · SUITEE 113 · BAKEi::ISFIE!-D, CA 9330~
[805] 383-6460 · FAX [805] 3~-47~
O~AY J.
A~n~)'
AGENCY
Name of individtJal, partn'e[ship~ company or corporation currently legally lice, aged t¢
pcrbrm tt,~ drilling, digging, driving or bori~g of domestic ~'ato. r wells )n Ken
Co,~aty. ; '
EARI~IEG, Lff0- 1880 Vernon Street, Suite 7, Rose~ille, ~A ggBIB
Business Address: aRlHl~C, CTO. 1880 Vevn0n Street, Suite 7, Roseville, gA gSO)~
Busings( phone number: (gl~ )~LL~=~_ ............ .. = ..... _ ...... _
If jndividual.:owner or partnership glw home address(s) and home phone(s) where
owner(~) c~n~be r~ached ~fter normal work hours.
Ed Hendr~ok home' phon~ - g16-7~l-2H1
I{' company or corporation glw home address and phone number of company or
corporation representative that has the primary management responsibility.
Current California State Well Drilling contractor's License Number.
9. Number of drilling rigs: .,.~ ........ _ , .... : ..... , Typ~: __Tr'u~k.= ........ ~ounted.[3-53 and_ ..... 8-3~
Trucks used for moving rigs:
Make of Truck
FORD 1987 356079
OWNERSHIP IDENTIFICATIONI
Lettering th~l gives name, address and phor~e number and assigned re{llstrstion number
business is to be on both sides of truck cab thai hauls or.fowl drilhng equipment,
STATI;.
COM IIIN~llATiON
I N I~U IqANCll
FUND'
F5 8RU,~ RY
P.O. BOX 807, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94101-0807
CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
. I 990 , POLICY NUMBER:
CERTIFICATE EXPIRES=
1 0-I-
SA,~-! .J(~AQUIN CO'U,gTY
E~VZRCNP. ENTAL HEALTH C~V[SION
P.O. BOX 20~9
Sl 0CKTO~ CA 952C1
~01~ L
JO8: ALL CALIFOR?~IA
~PER~TI
L_
This is to certify that we have issued a valid Workers' Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the California
Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated,
This p~iicy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon ten days' advance written notice to the employer.
We will al~o give you TEN days' advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration.
This certificate of insurance is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the
policies listed herein. Notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or other document with
respect tO which this certificate of insurance may be issued or may pertain, the Insurance afforded by the policies
described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies.
PRE.~IOENT
~:"FL~'fE?,'~ LIAEiLiTY LI;'I:T: ~3,']C:),,2']C' ? '
EMPLOYER
r-
CURTIS E H,"NDR[CK
DER: EARTHTEC,~ LTD.
1,~30 VERN(~N STREET~,
RC SEVILLE
C~ 95 57,~,
#7
PRODUCER
JOHN O, BRONSON CO,
P.O. BOX 2553B7
SACRAMENTO~ CALIFORNIA
ZIP CODE
IN~URE~
EARTHTEg~ LTD,
EP HEN~RICK
1830 VERNON ST, SUITE 7
ROSEVILLE~ CA
ZIP CODE 95678
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSU£~ AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RI6HTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CKRTIFICATE DOE8 NOT AMEND
EXTEND OR ALT~R THE COU£RAGE AFFOR~E~ BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVE~AOE
COMPANY LETTER A TRAVELERS INSURANCE
COMPANY LETlEk B
COMPANY LETTER C FE~ ~ 1990
COMPANY LETTER D
COMPANY LETTER E
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTE~ BELOW HAVE ~[EN ISSUEU l'(I THE INSURED NAHED ABOVE ~OR lHE POLIC
F'ERIDD IN~ICATED~ NOT~I?HSTANDING ANY REOUIRE~ENT~ TER~ DR CONDITION DF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUHENT ~ITH RESPECT
WHICH THIS CERTIFIC~[.~Y BE )SSUED ~ ~AY,F'ERTAIN~ THE INSURANCE AFFORPEB..B~.IHE ~OLI~tES ~E~CR~BEb HEREIN' t~ SUB,
TO ALL THE TE~MS~ EXCLUSIONS~ AND COH[~ITtON$ DF SUCR POLICIES, LIMII'S SHUSH MAY HAVE BEEN RE~UuED BY PAID CLAt~S,
====================================================================================================================
CO POLICY POLICY
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EFF. DAlE EXP. DATE ALL LIHITS IN THOUSANDS
IGENERAL LIABILITY
I
Al (X) COMMERCIAL GENERAL'LIABILITY 660~84JI~5088 04/10/8~ 04/10/90 I GENERAL A~OREGATE $I~
I ( ) CLAIMS MADE (~) OCCURRENCE I PRO~UCT-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $1;
I ( ) OWNERS & CDNTRAU~OR8 PROTECTIVE I PERSONAL & ADVERTIStN~ INJURY $1;
) ( ) - ' i EACH OCCURRENCE
I ( ) . ~ FIRE DAMAGE (ANY ONE FIRE) $1(
.J .................................... ~ ......................................
(AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY I CSL
I ( ) ANY AUTO
() ALLOWNEDAUTOS t~ODILY INJURY
I) SCHEDULEDAUTDS i(PERPERSON)
HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
I ( ) NON-OWNED AUTOS (PER ACCIDENT) $
I ( ) GARAGE LIABILITY I PROPERTY
__!_L! ................................ : ...................................... !_~E .......... ! ...................
I I EAC"
IEXCES8 OCCURRENCE AGGRE
LIABILITY
I ( ) UMBRELLAFOR,
I ()DTHERTHANUMBRELLAFORM I I $ $
................................................................................ ~i~iGi~Ei ..........................
WORKERS' OOMFENSATION ' ' $ (E ~ ~CIDENT)
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ~ $ (DiSEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE)
/
..................... , .............. ...................................... ....................................
I I I
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS JOB: THE GROVE AT JOHNSTON PARK APARTMENTS,
CERTIFICATE HOLDER I CANCELLATION
M~. BRUCE MINTZER I SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE.CANCELLED BEFORE THE.EX-
512 lOTH STREET P~RATIDN DATE THEREDF~ THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL IO DA'
SACRAMENTO~ CA I WRITTEN NOTICE TU THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT~ BUT FAILURE
· I TO HAIL SUCH NOTICE ~HALL IMF'O~E,NO OBLIOATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND
ZIP CODE 95814 i UPON THE CO~PANY~ ITS AGENTS OR RE~ESENTATIVES.
.......................................
COMPANY BACKGROUND
EEIRTHTC--C, Ltd., Is a limited partnership ~hat
mas formed In March, 1981, The company is
located in Roseville, California. The company
provides professional services in soil engineer-
ing, 9sob9y. engineering geology, field obser-
varJon and density testJng during earthwo~
conslzuclJ, on, and environmental consultation.
Our service area extends from ~e 8av area
to Reno and from Shasta to Fresno.
ERP, THTEC's support personnel includes
~ngineers, Geological Engineers. Engineering
Techn~dans, an, ~ngineering Secretarv, a
Boote~eper, and Drill Rig Crecu.
HRRTHTEC, Ltd., provides professional ser-
vices ~ arch~ec~s, engineers, developers, can-
tractars, governmental agencies, and private
oumers, Including major oil companies. FI list of
dl~nrs can be provided upon reeluest/further
discussion.
¢J:IRTHTEC, U:d.'s professLonai GeatechniccY
Engineering and Geological workload indudes
studies for shopping center sites, hospitals,
commercial and Industrial buildings, subdivi-
sions, slope InstabilJlcles, and geological
hazards.
PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT
C-d Hendrids is Earthl:ec's Pdndpai Consultant.
Ed has many years of experience as o Soil
Engineer, Geologist, and Engineering
Geologist, as uuell as a Master of Sdence
degree in ~nglneertng Science (Geology} from.
the University of Callfornla,'B~rkele¥ campus.
He is registered in I~e State of California as
a Civl~ Engineer, a Geatechnlca! Engineer, a
Geologist, and certified as an Engineering
Geologist. He is also r~gistered in the State
of Nevada as a Civil Engineer. In addition, he
has Class Fi General Engineering and C-57
~llnter tUell Driller's contractor'~ licenses from
18~0 Vernon Street, ~ulte 7
Ro~eulll~. I~R 9.~678
- !
I-
Qualifications for
EFIRTHTEC, Ltd.
Fl G~o~¢hnical ~ncjin~ring and
Environmental ConSultatJon Compa~)
Serving Northern California
1830 Vernon Street. Suite 7
Rosevifle. CA 95678
(,916) 969-5252, · (916) 786-5262
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
Professional engineering and geological ser-
vices include:
General site.reconnaissance
Subsurface exploration to generally deter-
mine earth materials conditions
Soil m~chanlcs laborato~ testing to Further
assess various engineering properties
Soil mechanics analysis/evaluation Of site
and earth materials condlLtons and reporl:
of .conclusions and recommendations
Including:
--Graundmater
'--Foundation selection and soil beating
capability
--PotenUal seKlement
--Lateral ear~ pressures
--Potential seismicit~/
--Soil improvement methods
--Dewatering methods
--Slope stabilL~
--Slab-on-grade and pavement support
--Appropriate guide specifications
:: · ldenuflcaffon of and mitigation measures for
geologlc hazards, including:
-- Landslides
--Expansive soils ,
--Potential erosion ~' ~
--Faults and potential liquefaction
SOIL TESTING SERVICES
Quali~ assurance services include:
· Earthwork Observation and soil densl~
testing during construction of building pads
for residential and commercial buildings,'
pavement subgrades, and ether related
earthwork construction
· Moisture content verification
· Observation and compaction testing of
backfill for utility trenches, retaining malls,
el:C.
· Laboratory compaction characteristics to
determine soil maximum density -- optimum
moisture content
· All soil Sampling and testing is conducted
with the latest applicable or designated
specifications_ of the American Sodety for
Testing Materials (ASTM). American
f:lssodat~on of Sta~e HighuJay and Transpor-
tation Officials (FIRSHTO), or other pertinent
agencies
DRILLING SERVICES
ERRTHT£C, Ltd., maintains Mobile B-34 and
Mobile 8-53 auger ddlilng rigs with complete
soil sampling equipment for quick, flexible
response for subsurface exploration. Our dNI-
lng service is fully equipped to provide for
either environmental related or geotechnical
engineering related projects. U Jo can:
· Instatl monitoring ~uells up to four inches in
diameter
· Drill and sample exploratory borings for
various projects
· Keep all augers and samplers steam dean-
ed to avoid cross-contomlnaUon at con-
taminated sites
Drill at vartous onqles
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
EAflTHTEC, Ltd.'s Engineerlng-Geologfsts pro-
vide timely response to assessments of soll.
rock, and groundmater potential contamina-
tion by hazardous s. ubstances. S~ud[es'and
services include:
Solid uJaste assessment tests (S.LU,A.I',
far landfills
Pr~purchase site assessment of potential
contamination to document site conditions
in conjunction uJith real property transfem
Leaking underground storag~ ~ar~ and pro-
duct line assessments Including determine-"
tion of extent of contamination, liaison ~¢th -.'
regulatory agencies, report on cost effec-
tive dean-up ai~ernatJves, and proje4t-'
management of remedia~ion
Surface and subsurface investigation to
determine the source and extent ~IL
suspected soft and ground~u~
contamination
Analysis of field and analytical testing
stages from feasibilit~ ~rough final reports
including recommendations, design, Im-
plementation and operation of o fi~a!
remed~aLton measure
University of California, Davis, California: B.S. Geology,
1970.
University of California, Davis, California: Various
courses in Civil Engineering, 1971 - 1974.
University of California, Berkeley, California: M.S.
Engineering Science,' 197§.
University of California, Davis, California: Extension
courses on professional studies of current interest.
Professional. ~e~istrations and~9_CJl~.O~lOr=~nizations
Registered Civil Engineer: California and Nevada
Registered.Geotechnical Engineer: California
Registered Geologist~ California
Certified Engineering Geologist: California
· Mr. Hendrick is professionally active in the Association of
Engineering Geologists, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Geologic Society of America, and Building Industry
Association of Superior California.
Professional Hi~
Lowney-Kaldveer & Associates, Oakland, California, Staff
Geologist, summer 1974.
Moo~e & Taber, Northern California, West Sacramento,
California, En~ineer/Geologist, summer 1975, 1978 -
1978.
Lowry & Associates, SaCramento, California, Project Engineer
and Geologist, 1978 - 1979,
Hendrick Soil and Geological Engineering, Citrus Heights,
California, Principal, 1980.
Earthtec, Ltd., Roseville, California, Principal, 1981 -
present.
Mr, Hendrick has been a geotechnical/geological consultant
on over 1000 project~ in Northern California and Western
Nevada, including earth dams and levees; landfills;
residential, commercial, professional, and industrial
buildings; churches; roadways; bridges; gas and oil drilling
pads/sumps; slope stability and stabilization; erosion
mitigation; site seismioity and fault ident i3fication/-
location; other geologic and soil hazards; sewage ~%reatment
facilities and l~aterals; dewatering; groundwater monitoring;
groundwater determination: mass earthworks; airports:
breakwaters; shopping centers; underground utility vaults',
banks; pipelines; schools; bleachers; running tracks/play
fields; etc. Also, he has consulted on sites contaminated b~
hazardous substances, tyDicall~ related to hydrocarbons,
preliminary assessments prior to property sales, and
S.W.A.T.
February 5, 1990
ENGEL ~ cOMPANY
4oo~ UN,on AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93305
Mr. Mike Daniel
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Dear Mr. Daniel:
In reply to your request that'I study the feasibility of setting a drilling rig under
the drive-through canopy at your dry cleaning plant, 121 Monter. ey Street, for the pur-
pose of retrieving earth samples at a depth of thirty feet (30') or more below the
pavement surface, I call you.r attention to the following-: . ·
1) The drilling r!g's m"~Bt would have to projebt tbrough.,the canopy roof. I know
of no drilli, n~"equipment available which 'is caPable of drilling the required
depth with an. operating.h'~ight l(~wer than ..your canopy roof.
2) According to the' structural drawings of the canqpy¢ t%ere are steel beams running
north-south which have a clear spacing.of approx'imately six feet (6'). I don't
think it is possible, to nlaneuver a drilling rig into position under' the canopy
without removing at. least one of the steel' beams. These beams extend southerly
over your glassed-in receiving room to. a' concrete block walt at the rear of
the customer area. If you remove one beam you should remove them att and
dismantle the entire receiving room. To do otherwise would jeopardize the glass
watt and the r. emaining roof structure. You could re-erect the steel structure
and the glass ~vatt after the dri'lting has been completed, but you'would probably
have to replace the steel decking. It is practically impossible to remove and
re-use steel decking without having teaks.
3)
This is an expensive undertaking requiring that you make other arrangements
to serve your customers for a period of at least a week prior to drilling and
at least two weeks after the drilling has been completed.
4)
Perhaps there is a less expensive way to sample the earth under the canopy
such as slant drilling. I don't know enough about it to make specific recom-
mendations, but I suspect the drilling equipment would have to be more sophis-
ticated than that used in vertical drilling. Unless you already know it won't
work, it might be worthwhile to look into it.
Please advise, if you think I can be of further service .tn this matter.
Very trutY~' yours,
Alton C. Engel
ACE/Iw
cc." chuck Antonino, Valley Steel
John Wilson
February 5, 1990
ENGEL & COMPANY
400~ UNION AVENUE
BAKER,~FIELD0 CA 933C~
Mr. Mike Daniel
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Dear Mr. Daniel:
In reply to your request that I study the feasibility of setting a drill£ng rig under
'the drive-through canopy at your dry cleaning plant, 121 Monterey street, for the pur-
pose of retrieving earth samples at a depth of thirty feet (30') or more below the
pavement surface, T call your attention to the following:
1) The drilling rig's mast would have to project through the canopy roof. ~ know
of no drilling equipment available which is capable of drilling the required
depth with an operating height lower than your c, anopy roof.
2)
According to the structural drawings of the canopy, there are steel beams running
north-south which have a clear spacing of approximately six feet (6'). I don~t
think it is possible to maneuver a drilliOg rig into position under the canopy
· without removing at least one of the steel beams. These beams extend southerly
over your glassed-in receiv, ing room to a concrete block wall at the rear of
the customer area. If you remove one beam you should remove them a11 and
dismantle the entire receiving room. To do otherwise would jeopardize the glass
wall and the remaining roof structure. You could re-erect the steel structure
and the glass wall after the drilling has been completed, but you would probably
have to replace the steel decking. Tt is practically impossible to remove and
re-use steel decking without having leaks.
3)
This is an expensive undertaking requiring that you make other arrangements
to serve your customers for a period of at least a week prior to drilling and
at least two weeks after the drilling has been completed.
4)
Perhaps there is a tess expensive way to sample the earth under the canopy
such as slant drilling. ! don't know enough about it to make specific recom-
mendations, but I suspect the drilling equipment would have to be more sophis-
ticated than that used in vertical drilling. Unless you already know It won't
work, it might be worthwhile to look into it.
Please advise if you think T can be of further service in this matter.
Very truly yours,
ACE/lw
cc," Chuck Antonino, Valley'Steel
John Wilson
klII_E~0N &
LZlC:;r-~_ r'IATE~
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
DATE:
TO:
ATFENTION:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSED:
REMARKS:
SENT BY:
1701 WESTVVIND DRIVE · SUITE 103 · BAKERSFIELD, CA 93~101
IS05] 383-r~460 · FAX [B05] 323-4783
CONSTITUENT UNITS 15' DEPTH 20' DEPTH
I~'
BENZENE ug/g 0.02 92.21
TOLUENE ug/g 23.15 463.49
ETHYL BENZENE ug/~ 18.23 395.13
p-XYLENE ug/g 24.99 513.72
m-XYLENE Ug/g 49. 85 781.88
o-XYLENE ug/g 43.68 706.-15
TOTAL PET. ug/g 1333.36 20600,'74
HYDROCARBONS
/
25~ DEPTH 30' DEPTH
~-/ ~0~
60.09 ~.22
488.64 456.21
124.48 118.71
165.07 153.84
419.22 388.38
237.65 216.75
5659.43 5237.73
ENVIRONI,~NTAL
CHEIt~/CAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
Wilson'andA~sociates
1701Westwind~Dr ~103
Bakersfield, CA
Attention:.
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
02-Nov-89
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
93301
John R. Wilson
Date of
Report: 07-Nov-89
8689-1
~1 Sparkle Cleaners 15'
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
02-Nov-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
DATE ANALYSIS
CCMPL~:
05-Nov-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
~enzene ug/g O. 02 O. 02
Toluene ug/g 23.15 O. 02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 18.23 O. 02
p-Xylene ug/g 24.99 O. 02
m-Xylene ug/g 49.85 O. 02
o-Xylene ug/g 43.68 O. 02
Total Pet~le~
1333.36
5.00
PHONE 327-4911
TEST METHOD: TPH for' ~oline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituentS by EPA metP~xi 8020.
As Received Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
CHEIiIICAI. ,41VAI. Y$1$
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701WestwindDr ~103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Lab No.: 8689-2
Sample Desc: $2 Sparkle Cleaners 20'
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED: ·
02-Nov-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
02-Nov-89
Constituent
~ne
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
ug/g
Analysis
Results
92.21
463.49
395.13
513.72
781.88
706.15
20600.74
Date of
Report: 07-Nov-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
05-Nov-89
Reporting
Level
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Indivi~m! constituents by EPA method 8020.
As Received Basis
Co~ents:' Due to high level of Toluene, M-Xylene, O-Xytene
present, the lowest possible sample weight gave values out of
the instrument range.
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
~ V~Analy~t
ENVIRON~4ENTAL
CHEMICAL ~4NAL¥$1$
PETROLEU¥
EABO RATO RI ES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson andAssociates
1701 Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Lab No.: 8689-3
Sam~leDesc: $3 Sparkle Cleaners 25'
DATE SAMPLE
(]Or ,~ .~CTED:
02-Nov-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
02-Novr89
'Date of
Report: 07-Nov-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
05-Nov-89
'. Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units ~" Results Level
60.09 O. 02
Benzene ug/g .
Toluene ug/g 488.64 O. 02
Ethyl Benzene · ug/g 124.48 O. 02
p-Xylene ug/g 165.07 O. 02
m-Xylene ug/g 419.22 O. 02
o-Xylene ug/g 237.65 O. 02
Total Petroleum
5659.43
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
As Received Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
~ ~nalyst
ENVIRON~IENTAL
CHE/itlCAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701 Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Lab No.: 8689-4
Sample Desc: $4 Sparkle Cleaners 30'
"i,. ~i ,.~:,':: i:.'.~,::~ ~::- ,,.~'. : ....... "'. .....
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
02-Nov-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
02-Nov-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Date of,
Report: 07-Nov-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COflPLgFED:
05-Nov-89
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g 64.22 0.02
Toluene ug/g 456.21 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 118~71 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 153.84 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 388.38 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g 216.75 0.02
Total Petroleum
5237.73
5. O0
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. r~thod.
Indivi~,al constituents by EPA method 8020.
As Received Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
~ ~ualyst
ENVIRONYENTAL
CHEmiCAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEU¥
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Quality Control Data
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Spike ID: 8629-17
Analysis Date: 05-Nov-89
Sample Matrix: Soil
Units: ug/g
Quality Control
for Lab Nos: 8689-1, 8689-2, 8689-3, 8689-4
One sample in twenty is selected as a representative matrix which is
spiked. The percentage recovery (% Rec) of the spike is a relative
measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The comparison of the spik~
with a duplicate spike is a w~asure of the relative precision of the
analysis.
in Spike Added to Spike
Constituent Sample Spike % Eec
Benzene O. 03 5.02 98.06 99.86 1.82
Toluene O. 09 5 .' 16 103.88 109.13 4.93
Ethyl Benzene O. 03 5. O1 103.81 106.52 2.58
p-Xylene O. 05, 5.06 101.90 104.43 2.45
m-Xylene O. 08 5. O1 113.13 118.35 4.51
o-Xylene O. 05 5. O0 107.14 111.06 3.59
TPH Gas O. O0 301.06 89.99 95.66 6.11
% Recovery =
Spilmed Sample Concentration - Sample Concentration
(Concentration of Spike)
x 100
RPD (Relative Percent Difference) =
Spiked Sample Conc.- Spiked Duplicate Sample Conc.
(Average Conc. of Spikes)
X 100
sampler:
~ate Rec'd:
!'lient:
Lab ~ [Description:
Name:
Address:
BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Sample Type:
Water
Soil
Sludge
Oil
Other Tests
Other:' :i
(specifYi,
NO. L-3553
Analysis Requested:
Relinquished By: Date:
Time:
Received By:
Time:
Comments:
Whitc: Return to Customct with Rcpon
Yellow: BC Lab Copy
-'.~-~IUILS0N &
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
TO:
A'FrENTION:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSED:
REMARKS:
SENT BY:
cC..
1701 WESTWINO ORIVE · SUITE 103 · BAKE'RSFIELO, CA 93301
[805J 323-S460 · FAX JS05J 323-4723
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
October 10, 1989
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, California
93305
Subject:
Site Characterization at Sparkle Cleaners,
121 Monterey Street, Bakersfield, CA
Dear Mr. Daniels:
The site characterization reports prepared by Wilson and Associates have
been reviewed by this Department. The report indicated the presence of gasoline
plume by the dispenser area.
The report presented three mitigation alternatives including the estimated
costs and clean-up time. These alternatives are as follows:
Excavation and Disposal: Contamination can be removed to none
detected levels but this method is not cost-effective.
w
Vapor Extraction: This method is effective in removing gasoline
contamination in permeable formations. A Permit from the Kern County
Air Pollution Control District may be required for the air emissions
of the treatment system. This alternative is acceptable to this
Department.
Status Quo (do nothing): This alternative was recommended by Wilson
and Associates with the understanding that this site'would need to
'be remediated at a future date.
This Department cannot approve the "status quo" proposal at this time due
to the following reasons:
The "remediation at a future date" is not clearly describqd.
The potential for perched groundwater at about 65' exists as
indicated by recent drilling in the vicinity of the site.
Mr. Mike Daniels
October 10, 1989
· Page 2
The "status quo" will be reconsidered pending your ~esponse to our
concerns. Regardless of the remediation chosen, please inform this office of
your decision within 15 days from the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805)
8~61-3636.
Sincerely,
o l 5.0
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cas
cc: John Wilson, Wilson and Associates
\c:\wp\gough\sparkles.ltr
' ~I~IIL~ON &
,4~OCl,4TF~
DATE:
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
TO:
SU~ECT: <~ ~~
I
ENCLOSED:
REMARKS:
SENT BY:
1701 WESTWIND ORIVE · SUITE 103 · BAKERSFIELO, CA 93301
[8051323-6460 · FAX 1805] 323-4723
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SURVEYING
DATE:
TO:
ATTENTION:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSED:
REMARKS:
~S
SENT BY:
/\
1701 WESTWINO ORIVE · SUITE 103 ' ~AKERSFIELE), C~, 93301
[805) 323-6460 ® FAX (805] 323-4723
BORING NO. 1
Depth
0' -0.2'
0.2' - 10.0'
10.0' - 20.0'
20.0' - 23.0'
23.0' - 25.0'
25.0' -
12.5'
20.0'
25.0'
Description
A.C. Paving, 2" thick
Lt. brown sl. silty med. fine sand, damp
Lt. brown very sl. silty med. ?? sl odor of
"gas"
Sample No. 070689-1
Dark brown, sl'. silty med. sand, damp
Sample No. 070689-2
Lt. brown silty med. sand with small"rocks
and cobbles
Sample No. 070689-3
Bottom of boring
BORING NO. 2
Depth
O' - 0.2'
0.2' - 10.0
10.0' - 20.0"
20.0'
Description
A.C. paving, 2" thick
Lt. brown si. silty med. fine sand, damp
Lt. brown sl. silty med. sand, damp
15.0' Sample No. 070689-4
20.0' Sample No. 070689-5
Bottom of boring
BORING NO. 3
Depth
O' -0.2'
0.2' - 10.0
10.0'- 20.0'
20.0'
20.0
15 .0'
20.0'
· Description
A.C. Paving, 2" thick
Lt. brown si. silty med. fi'ne sand, damp
Lt. brown sl. silty med. sand, damp
sample No. 070689-6
Dark brown sl. silty med. sand, damp
Sample No. 070689-7
Bottom of boring
GARY J. WICKS
Agency Director
(805) 861-3502
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOURCE ~~~NT
DEPARTI ~MENTAL
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
AGENCY
September 25, 1989
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
' 121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Subject: .Site Characterization Report
Sparkle Cleaners, 121 Monterey St., Bakersfield, CA
Permit #: 140006 (A-750-14)
Dear Mr. Daniels:
The site characterization report prepared by Wilson & Associates for the.
sUbject site .has been reviewed by .this Department. In order to adequately
evaluate the proPosed remediation alternatives, the log of the soil borings must
be submitted for our review.
This information must be submitted to this office within 7 days from the.. .
- " .... .. .' , -:.:,."~..:. i' .;'
date 'of this letter.'' .
If you' have''any qUestions regarding this matter~ pleaSecall me at'(805) 861- .... ~.
3636' "
Sincerely,
· Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist II
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:cd
dolores\daniels.let
~IL~ON ~
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
DATE:
TO:
ATTENTION:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSED:
REMARKS:
SENT BY:
17Ol WESTWIND DRIVE ' SUITE 103" BAKERSFIELD. CA ~)3301
[805l 323-6460 · FAX [805] 323-4723
BORING NO. i
Depth
O' - 0.2'
0.2' - 10.0'
10.0" -' 20.0'
20.0' - 23.0'
23.0' - 25.0'
25.0' -
12 .5'
20.0'
25 .0'
Description
A.C. Paving,
Lt. brown sl.
silty med rlnm sand,
damp
Lt. brown very sl. ~i't%-y-~m~'d" ?? si odor of
"gas" ' -=~'- .......
Sample No. 070689-1
Dark brown, si. silty med. sand~ damp
Sample No. '070689-2
Lt. brown silty med. sand with small rocks
and cobbles
Sample No. 070689-3
Bottom of boring
BORING NO. 2
Depth
0' - 0.2'
0.2' - 10.0~
10.0' - 20.0'
20.0'
Description
A.C. Paving, 2" thick
Lt. brown si. silty med. fine sand, damp
Lt. brown si. silty med. sand, damp
15.0' Sample No. 070689-4
20.0' Sample No. 070689-5
Bottom of boring
BORING NO. 3
Depth
O' -0.2'
0.2' - 10.0
10.0'- 20.0'
20.0'
20.0
15 .0'
20.0'
Description
A.C. Paving, 2" thick
Lt. brown st. silty med. fine sand, damp
Lt. brown sl. silty med. sand, damp ~%.
sample No. 070689-6
Dark brown sl. silty med., sand, damp
Sample No. 070689-7
Bottom of boring
]ILC:;ON & ,
"' XIEiE OClXITI?
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
August 25, 1989
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Attn: Mike Daniels
Re: Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey street
· Dear Mr. Daniels;
Attached are the results of our Site Characterization,
Addendum 1, for Sparkle Cleaners, 121 Monterey Street, Bakers-
field, California.
If you have any question, please contact %his office.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kern County Environmental
Health Services Department
Dolores Gough
~23270
1701 WI:STVV1NO O~IIVE · SUITE 103 · BAKERSFIELD, CA
(1~0~--] ~:?.3-r=~4E}O · FAX [BIDS] ~--~'~--4783
Si%e Characherization
Sparkle Cleaner's
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, California
Prepared by:
John R. Wilson and Associates, Inc.
1701Westwind Drive, Suite 103
Bakersfield; California
Procedure/Results
Pursuant to approval by Dolores Gough, Hazard'ous Materials Special-
isis, Kern County Health Services Department, three borings were comp-
leted at Sparkle Cleaners, 121 Monterey Street, Bakersfield, California.
These borings were completed on July 6, 1989.
The boring equipment consisted of a truck mounted,
hollow stem, continuous flight auger.
8 5/8" diameter
Samples were collected at various depths, as referenced below, and
analyzed for BTX, and TPH, also referenced below~
Laboratory Results (ug/g)
Sample Boring Depth Benzene Toluene Ethyl Xylenes TPH
Number Number Feet Benzene p m o
070689-1 1 12-1/2 ND 0.24 ND ND ND ND ND
070689-2 1 20 ND 0.26 ND ND ND ND ND
070689-3 1 25 ND 0.24 ND ND ND ND ND
070689-4 2 15 ND 0.24 ND ND ND ND ND
070689-5 2 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
070689-6 3 15 ND 0.23 ~ ND ND ND ND ND
070689-7 3 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Samples were collected Using a split spoon sampler. Soil was
transferred to glass jars, sealed with aluminum foil and a seal and lid
attached. Samples were placed in an ice filled container and delivered
to B.C. Laboratories, Bakersfield.
Summary of Results - July 6, 1989
Minor amounts of Toluene Were found to a depth of twenty-five feet
in Boring No. 1. The testing, 'in general, did not detect significant
amounts of contamination in any test hole.
Summary of Results - August 11, 1989 & March 7, 1989
Significant contamination exists in an area as delineated on the
site plan to a depth of approximately fifteen feet. A "clean" sand layer
was found at a depth of approximately 10-13 feet, and was.generally
limited to an area on the western side of the canopy.
Recommendations
There are
below.
three mitigation
alternatives for
this site as outlined
1. Excavate all soil contamination and remove to a suitable
disposal site. /¢
Due to the fact that the soil contamination lies under or
adjacent to a structure supporting the roof/canopy, the costs %o
excavate will be high as illustrated below.
Spakle Cleaners
Page 2
Plans and Specifications
Excavation
20'x20'x14' deep = 200 c.y. @ ll/c.y.
Shoring
Backfill - 200 c.y. @ $15/c.y.
Import - 200 c.y. @ $8/c.y.
Disposal - 200 c.y. (300 tons)
Trucking - 35 hrs. @ $65/hr.
Disposal Fees - 300 tons @ $85-/ton
Taxes (approx.) 300 tons @ $24/ton
Soil Testing (Analytical)
8 Samples @ $10$/ea.
Technician - 6 hrs. @ $48/hr.
Soil Testing (Geotechnical)
Technician - 16 hrs. @ $48/hr.
Compaction Testing
Structural Engineer
Paving
Shoring & Underpenning
Final Report
Materials, Copies, Supplies, etc.
Sub-Total:
~oss of 4 days of revenue due to closure
of "drive-thru"
1,500
2,200
2,000
3,000
1,600
2,275
25,500
?,200
840
288
768
400
1,500
2,350
5,000
2,000
500
58,921
4,680
Total: $ 63,601
Approximate time to complete after approvals - 45 days.
2. Operate a vapor extraction system (VES)
Complete 3-4 "wells" to extract "gasoline vapors" by applying a
vacuum to the wells and discharging through a APCD approved
system.
Approximate cost as determined by Thorne
Environmental
Loss of 4 days of revenue due to closure
of "drive-thru"
Approximate time to complete including
approvals - 4-6 months
Status Quo
The site would be left '"as is"
nothinq.
$15,000-$20,000
4,680
This recommendation is to do'
Sparkle Cleaners
Page 3
This office is recommending
understanding that this site
future date. Demolition of
iation of the faciIity.
to leave the site "as is" with the
would need to be remediated at a
the structure would require remed-
our recommendation is based upon the following:
The source of the contaminaiion was apparently the dispenser
lines. The tanks and dispenser lines have been removed.
2. The entire site is surfaced with either paving or concrete
thus.preventing downward migration of the contamination.
3. Groundwater is at a depth of approximately 126 feet.
4. Contamination was ,~enerally located above a depth 'of
5. The limitations for site remediation due to adjacent struc-
tures.
EtWIRONMENTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable' Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701WestwindDr ~103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-1
070689-1 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Benzene ug/g none detected
Toluene ug/g' 0.24
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g none detected
m-Xylene ug/g none detected
o-Xylene ug/g none detected
Total Petroleum
none detected
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
13-Jul-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
5. O0
TEST METHOD: T~ for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S.
Cert. ~102
ENVIRONI~ENTAL ~
LABORATORIES, INC.
PETROL£Ufll J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(,SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr ~103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-2
070689-2 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Benzene ug/g none detected
Toluene ug/g 0.26
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g none detected
m-Xylene ug/g none detected
o-Xylene ug/g none detected
Total Petroleum
none detected
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
13-Jul-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
5. O0
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
£NWRONM~NTAL ~
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
PETROLEU¥ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr $i03
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-3
070689-3 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COl ,f ,~--"I'ED:
06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
DATE ANALYSIS
CCMPLETED:
13-Jul-89
Minin~m
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected
Toluene ug/g 0.24
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g none detected
m-Xylene ug/g none detected
o-Xylene ug/g none detected
Total Petroleum
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
none detected
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
ID~ividual constituents by EPA meth~ 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
ENVIRONYENT,4L
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-4
070689-4 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEI~ @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Benzene ug/g none detected
Toluene ug/g 0.24
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g none detected
m-Xylene ug/g none detected
o-Xylene ug/g none detected
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLEFED:
13-Jul-89
Reporting
Level
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
none detected
5. O0
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O,H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020,
Dry Matter Basis
Co~m~nts:
California D.O.H.S. Cert, ~102
fAnalyst
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHEI/IC,4L ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Date of
Report:
'Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-5
070689-5 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
,06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
DATE ANALYSIS
ODMFLETED:
13-Jul-89
Minimum
, Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene Ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
none detected
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method,
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
EN¥1RONMEHTAL
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
PETROLEUM
. ABORATORIES, INC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
t%zrgeable Aro~tics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701'Westwind Dr $103
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Date of
Report: 19-Jul-89
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-6
070689-6 Soil In Jars
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
06-Jul-89
Constituent
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@LAB:
06-Jul-89
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
13-Jul-89
Reportir~~ A~mlysis Reporting
Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected
0.23
Toluene ug/g ..
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g none detected
m-Xylene ug/g none detected
o-Xylene ug/g none detected
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
none detected
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
ENVlRONM~TAL ~ :
PETROLEUM J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.'
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(BOIL)
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Dr ~103
Bakersfield~ CA 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
5246-7
070689-7 Soil In Jars
19-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
06-Jul-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
06-Jul-89
Reporting Analysis.
Constituent Units Results~
Benzene ~ ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Banzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ' ug/g
Total Petroleum
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
none detected
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
13-Jul-89
Mininum
Reporting
Level
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
5. O0
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Co~z~nts:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
0 YAnalyst
Date Rec'd: BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. L- ] 2 ] ]
Client: Sampler: Sample Type: Analysis Requested:
Name: /'7o/A.~ C~7~t,4o /~,~ Name: ......... Water Other: ~ un ~, ~ u, ~
Ad.ess: ~o~ Ad.ess: ' .SoU ~ (specify) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~' '~ Sludge ~ ~ ~
Attn: ~/ ~3o/ ~1 ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~
-Lab $ Des~ption: Other Tests ~ m
Relinquish~ By: Date: T~e: ~eceiv~ By: Date: Time: Coments:
· White: Remm to Customer with Report
Yellow: BC Lab Copy
Date Rec'd: C CHAIN OP~i~USTODY '~'i";~"'* NO. L- 1 2 I ' : .i:~.!iii!
Client: Sampler: Sample Type: ?/ Analysis
Name:
Attn:
Lab ~ Des~pfiOn: - ... . O~er
Relinquish~ By: Date: T~e:' ~eceiv~ By:~
......
:-- - .... :7 d ' ' ' .-/" ". ~
i White: Remm to Customer with Report '
-.Yellow: BC Lab Copy
2700 "M" Streel, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
(805) 861-3429 Fax Number
COUNTY OF KERN
Environmental Health Services Department
June 1, 1989
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305
Subject:
Site Characterization Proposal, Addendum I
Sparkle Cleaners, 121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
Permit # 140006 (A750-14)
Dear Mr. Daniels:
In reviewing the site characterization addendum prepared by Wilson & Associates for the
subject site, this Department approves of the work described in the proposal. Should the full
extent of contamination not adequately defined by this phase of the investigation, subsequent
addendum to this proposal must be submitted to th/s Department.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Dolores Gough
Hazardous Materials Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
DG:dr
dolores\daniels.Itt
5/31/19
· XIgIL_SON ~
_ AEiSOr'IATE~
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
M~¥ 2 2 ~989
~pr.i 1
ENVi RON MENTAL HEALTH
Hs. ..lanis Lehman
Kern County Health Department
Enuironmental Health Division
· 2700 "H" Street
BaKersfield, CA ..03301
Si t~ C:hm. racteriz.stion Proposal, Addendum I
SparKle Cleaners
Dear Ids.. Lehman;
Attached is a copy of our "Site Char. acter-izatior, Proposal:
Addendum I" for SparKle Cleaners on Monterey Street, BaKersfield,
California, for- your r. evie,.g.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
rR~espectfull>' Submitted,
(dc~hn R. Wilson, R.C.E. #23270
k~, g. Expires !2/31/87 ~
1701 WEST//VlNO OI:IIVE * SUITE 10:3 ' BAKEI::ISFIELO, CA Cl3301
[80~5J 3~B~o460 · I=AX [BO5] 3~B3-4783
Si te
Characterization Proposal ,
For
SparKle Cleaners
121Honterey Street
8aKersfiled, California
Addendum I
Prepared By:
John R. Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind Drive, Suite 103
BaKersfield, California 93301
B~.cKqr. ound/Si te Histor~z
On August 11 ~ 1.988 McNabb C:c. nstr,Jction Company of BaKersfield
rernoved t~..go-ten thousand gallon underground gasoline tanks located
near the northeast corner 'of SparKle Cleaners at 121 r~lontere'..','' Street.
After removal of the t.anKs, B,C. Laboratories procurred four
sarnples:fro~ the soil under the tanks, t,.....,o samples from the soil under
the product 1 ines and t~..go sarnples frorn the soi 1 under/near the ~,,.;est
end of the dispenser island.
The soil samples .,.Jer. e del ivered to E',.C. Lalz, or. atories f.:,r.
constituent .analysis. The samples .,..ere an.alyzed for TPH and BT)(. All
sarnples, were "l',ione Detected" for. all con.--.ti tuents ex,_-ept for' th~ t~,.o
sampl es procurred from under the west ' end of the di spenser i ql and.
The analysis for the island follows;
Benzene ug/g 4.80 2.63
Toluene ug/g 1,~',. 13 50.67
Ethyl Benzene u g.,"g 25.84 82.5,_~
p-),.'.yl ene ug,;g 55.._44 I 66.14
m-Xyl ene ug/g 80. el 238.29
o-Xyl ene ug/g 7.9.9`8 235.63
I sopropyl Benzene u g,"g 17.53 82..98
Pet. Hydrocarbons u g,"g .99'3.02 2807.34
Total Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g 1273.85 3,~6.25
The site is served by California Water Service Company. The
depth to the unconfined aquifer, in this area is approximately 126
feet.
A workplan, "Site Characterization Proposal for SparKle Cleaners,
121 Monterey Street, BaKersfield, California", was submitted to the
Kern County Health Department on November 20, 19'8.9, for review. See
Exhibit A. On February 14, 19'8.9, the Kern County Environmental Health
Department determined that the worKplan was acceptable.
On March 7, 1.98.9, an "Extendahoe - BacKhoe" was used to procure
additional soil samples from the "dispenser island" area. Two holes
were excavated to depths of approximately 13-1/2'. See Exhibit B.
The following is a summary of the analytical resul ts of the
sampling. See Exhibit C. (Note: Mailed copies of the results were
received April 19', 19`89'.)
Sample No. Boring No. Depth
8.90307-1 1 ,~. 6 1/2'
-2 1 ~9 1/2'
-3 1 ~ 13 1/2'
-6 2 i_ ~-~ .... 10 1/2'
-7 2 i 13 1/2'
L a t-, o r a t o r. >.' R e ---. u 1 t .--. ~ u q,.." q
S '.;' 0 :;: 0 7 - 7
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-)<yl ere
m-X>'l ene
o -:~ ,'," 1 ere
Total Petroleum
Hydpocaphons
23, :--:_ F,_ i 4 , ,_,~-' ~.'--' I · 'P 5 f".I D
8,6 9 7 ~ o .q.~ r~ :3 9 ~3 4 7 N E:,
';' 8 3 ¢";' 7:3 ';' 5 --, ¢, ,p 8
...... - ~,.. ND
41 2,2S ?5 · 8,4 61 · ,.-"3 NC'
'P5'P · 1:3 217,86 I 48.75 ND
543 · 7,5 1 25 · 75 75.75 ND
15301.7,5 5114.21 ~ 6240.23.¢/ ND
~--
ND
ND
ND
O. 12
0. '"4
0.32
4:3. ?6 ~
At the bottom of each excavation, the soil was "a clean running
sand" causing the hole to "bell out". Gas odors ,,ere noticed., as t.gell
as detection of hydrocarbons by meter.
The results of samples procurred from Boring bio. 1 is generally
representative of the prior sampling. The results of Boring No. 2 is
"none detected" at the upper levels, with' minor amount of detected
constituents in the previously described sand layer at t3-I/2 feet·
Proposal
Due to an overhanging canopy~ it was necessary to use a "bacKhoe"
for obtaining soil samples. We are proposing to drill four additional
borings to a maximum depth of forty feet using a continous flight~
hollow stem auger. These holes will be drilled around the exterior
edge of the canopy· See Exhibit D.
Samples will be procurred at incremental depths of five feet
commencing at five feet by driving a split spoon sampler into
undisturbed soil. The soil samples would be placed into glass jars~
covered with aluminum foil, lids tightly applied, labeled, and placed
on ice in a'plastic bag. The samples would be transported to B.C.
Laboratories along with chain-of-custody documentation. Samples would
be analyzed to BTX constituents~ including TPH (gasoline)·
During sampling a "hydrocarbon meter" would be used to ascertain
if hydrocarbons were present. If hydrocarbons were not detected, an
additional five feet would be drilled and an additional sample
procurred.
After completion of drilling, the' hc. lu~ would be bacKfilled with
a combination of bentonite and native soil.
An enqineering technician will be present during,the site
drilling to record observations, provide field screening of samples,
and to comp le soil logs of excavations.
-2-
Heal th and Safety
CC, ITIff~OI'I ~.en.--.e FFle -~
~.~ur'es. to saf e gu ar ,-I per-=.onn~l ..~.t he site ~..~,ill be
-~--~,-,-~ This in,_-lude~ the use c,f boots, hard hats, a~nd glo,...,~s, et,_-.
Final Report in,:~ /
This. office ,.,..~i ll '=.uhmi t COl:,ies. ,of the .--.m. mple Im.n.~.lys. is to the-
Kern r:nunty Heal th Del:,..~.rtment wi thin 7 days. ,of r'e,-,e~l:,t from B.C.
Laboratories, !~ithin t~.,,~o ~.,eeKs of our receipt of m.r, al>.'s.;~ ~,.~e ~gi ll
· _=.ubmit a report of ,_-,ur findings,
-3-
~.1~. J~ni':-. L. ehmam
P.e~n C,_~umt.~. He~.! th r.'eO.-~r trnent
~n~.~ir. onmer, tal He~l t~, C,i,..,isi,-,n
2~rjo "M" Street
8, akersf iel d, C~ 93.301
Si te Characterization Proposal
SparKle Cleaners
De ar Ms. Lehman;
Attac
Proposal f
8aKersfiel
heal is a copy of the "Site Characteriz
or SparKle Cleaners on Monterey Street
d, for yoLIr rev i ew.
If you have any questions, please contact t
Respectfully Submi fred,
John R. Wilson~ R.C.E. #2327
Reg. Expires 12/31/89
tion
is office.
EXHIBIT A'
SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROPOSAL
FOR
SPARKLE CLEANERS
121 MONTEREY STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared'by:
John R. Wilson and Associates
4000 Easton Drive, Suite 18
Bakersfield, California 93309
SITE C:HARACTERIZATION WORKF'LAN
BacKqr. our, d,"Si te Hi-=.tor?"
On August 11: 1'~E:8 M,_-Nabb C:onstruction C:ompan';/ of Bakersfield
remoued two-ten thousand gallon underground gasoline tanK~ located
near the northeast corner of Sparkle Cleaners at 12! Monterey Street.
After. removal of the tanks, B.C:. Laboratories. procurred four
samples from the soil under the tanks, two samples from the soil under
the product lines and two samples from the soil under.."near the west
end of the dispenser island.
The soil samples were delivered to B.C. Laboratories for
constituent analysis. The samples were.anajyzed for TPH and BTX. All
samples were "None Detected" for all constituents except for the two
samples pre, cuffed from under the west end of the dispenser island.
The analysis for the island follows;
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
Isopropyl Benzene
Pet. Hydrocarbons
Total ~et. Hydrocarbons
u g/g
u g/g
u g/g
ug/g
ugx'g
u g/g
u g/g
u g?g
ug/g
2t 6t
4.80 2.63
16.13 50.67
25.84 82.56
55,64 166.14
80.91 238.29
77.98 235.63
17.53 82.98
993.02 2807.34
1273.85 3666.25
The site is served by California Water Service Company. .The
depth to the unconfined aquifer in this area is approximately 126
feet.
Sampl inq Proposal
Due to the overhanging canopy it is proposed to use an
"extendahoe" backhoe for obtaining soil .samples. Three test holes are
proposed at the locations indicated on the attached "Facility Plat".
The holes would be excavated to a depth of approximately sixteen feet.
Soil samples would be taken at depths of; 7', 10', 1:3' and bottom of
excavation. Soil would be collected from the bucket of the backhoe.
Care would be taken to gather the soil from the "interior" of the soil
in the bucket. The collected soil would be placed into glass "Mason
Jars", capped and taped. The samples would be labeled with a sample
number, boring number, and depth, and placed in a plastic bag. The
bagged sample would be stored on ice, and transported to B.C.,.-
Laboratories along w,i th chain'of-custody documentation. "
Samples would be analyzed for BTX constituents, i'including TPH
(gasoline).
-1-
Page 2
SparKle Cleaners
November 30, 1988
During smmpling a "hydrocarbon meter" would be used to ascertain
if-contamination existed in the soil. ]'his would assist in
determirming which sample to analyze.
If the "meter" detected hydrocarbons in the bottom of the
excavation, then the first sample analyzed would be at t'he bottom of
the excavation.
If significant hydrocarbon contamination exists at the bottom of
the excavation, it would be proposed to use a "slant" drill rig for
procurring samples to a maximum depth of forty-feet. The "slant"
drill rig would be used for drilling under the .overhanging canopy.
After completion of drilling, the holes would be bacKfilled with
a combination of bentonite and native soil.
No underground sampling is proposed in this worKplan.
An engineering technician wi'll be present during the site
drilling to record observations,~provide field screening of samples,
procure samples, and to completei'soil logs of the excavations.
Heal th and Safety
Common sense measures to safeguard personnel at the si te will. be
observed. This includes the use of boots, hard hats, gloves, and
safety glasses at a minimum.
Final Reportinq
This office will submit copi~es of the sample analysis sheets to
the Kern County Health Department within 3 days of receipt of from
B.C. Laboratories. Within two weeks of their receipt we will submit a
report of our findings which will include the following; description
of activities and observations, soil logs, cross-section, mitigation
alternatives, sample analysis sheets, and chain-of-custody forms.
EXHIBIT B
AGIIICUL Tll~q ~
~ET~OLEU~ 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-491 i
Wilson and Associates
4000 Easton Drive ~16
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Lab No.: 1651-1
Sample Desc: ~890307-1
PUrgeableAromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Report:
10-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
07-Mar-89
Constituent
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
08-Mar-89
Reporting Analysis
Units Results
DATE ANALYSIS-
COMPLETED:
10-Mar-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g 23.35 0.02
Toluene ~g/g 869.71 0.02
'Ethyl Benzene ug/g 283.99 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 412.28 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 959.13 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g 543.76 0.02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
15301.62
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Co~nents:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
Analyst
EXHIBIT C
OF:lIES, Inc.
,EI',9OL£1JAt J' J' EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Wilson and Associates
4000 EastonDrive $16
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
Attention: John R. Wilson
Lab No.: 1651-2
Sample Desc: ~890307-2
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Re~ort: lO-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
07-Mar-89
· Constituent
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
08-Mar-89
Reporting Analysis
Units Results
DATE ANALYSIS
10-Mar-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g 14.83 0.02
Toluene ug/g 332.03 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 73.95 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 95.64 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 217.86 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g 125.75 0.02
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
5114.21
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA m~thod 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Co~nents: ·
Calif°rnia D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
Analyst
AGfIICU; TUR~
,,.,,,,,,.,,,,, LABORATORIES, Ir'lC.
I~ELgOL£LI~ J.J. EGLIN, REG. CHE~.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Wilson and Associates
4000 EastonDrive ~16
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Lab No.: 1651-3
Sample Desc: $890307-3'
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Report: 10-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
07-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
08-Mar-89
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
10-Mar-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g 1.95 0.02
Toluene ug/g 90.47 0.02
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 39.98 0.02
p-Xylene ug/g 61.73 0.02
m-Xylene ug/g 148.26 0.02
o-Xylene ug/g 95.75 0.02
6240.23
5.00
TEST METHOD: TFH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $102
Analyst
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J' J' ~LIN, ~. CHEM. ENGR.
41~ PIE~E RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Wilson and Associates
1701Westwind ~103
Bakersfield, Ca 93301
Attention:John R. Wilson
Lab No.: 1651-6
Sample Desc.: $890307-6
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Report: 16-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
07-Mar-89
Reporting
Constituent Units
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Total Pet.
Hydrocarbons ug/g
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
08-Mar-89
Analysis
Results
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
15-Mar-89
Minimum
Reporting
Level
0.02
0.02
O. O2
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
5.00
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
Analyst
LABORATORIES, Inc.
iYTfl4~L£Ut~ J.J. EGLiN, REG. CHEM. ENGI~.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Wilson and Associates
4000 EastonDrive $16
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: John R.
Wilson
Date of
Report:
17-Mar-89
Lab No.: 1651-7
Sample Desc: $890307-7
PHONE 327-4911
DATE SAMPLE
COT,r,wLT~D:
07-Mar-89
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
08-Mar-89
DATE ANALYSIS
16-Mar-89
Minin~m
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g none detected
Toluene ug/g none detected
Ethyl Benzene ug/g none detected
p-Xylene ug/g O. 12
m-Xylene ug/g O. 24
o-Xylene ug/g O. 32
TOtal Petroleum
~drocar~ns ug/g ~.~
0.02
O. 02
0.02
O. 02
O. 02
O. 02
5. O0
TEST METHOD: TPH for gasoline by D.O.H.S.L.U.F.T. method.
Individual constituents by EPA method 8020.
Dry Matter Basis
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~102
"Analyst
Date Rec'd: ~ 7 BC CHAIN OF CUSTODY NO. L. 2 0 6 4
Client: ~'amp'ier: Sample Type: -Analysis Requested:
>~~
Name: ~mo ~ ~ Name: Water Other:
I.ab ~ Description: Other Tests
Yellow: BC Lab Copy
John R. Wilson
Civil Engineer
4000 Easton Dr., #16
Bakersfield, California 93309
(805) 323-6460
SUBJECT
-7_,
REPLY
2?00 '~' Street. ~te. 308
Bakersfge~d. CA 93301
1805) B61-3636
KERN COUNTY
Environmental Health Department
C.O.L.T. LOCAL OPTION
February 6, 1989
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
SUBJECT:
Location: 121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Sparkle Cleaners
PERMIT #: 140006
Dear Mr. Mike Daniels:
This letter is an official notice to inform you that the property described above
has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health to be the site of an
unauthorized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank. This
notice is sent to you because our records indicate that you are a responsible party
for this property.
As a responsible party, you must provide for all studies and work relating to the
above described property and the cost for oversight of these activities. California
Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7 and Kern County Ordinance Code Chapter 8.48 require
a determination of the threat to. the environment as a result of this release. THE
RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL, ON A TIMELY BASIS, DEVELOP A SITE CHARACTERIZATION,
FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN FOR KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'S
REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS INITIATED. Enclosed you will find attachment
"A", Handbook UT-35, which states the minimum required site workplan activities, the
necessary requirements for selecting environmental contractors qualified to perform
this work, a glossary of terms, example illustrations, and a section discussing the
answers to commonly asked questions.
The cost incurred by Kern ~ounty Environmental ~alth for the oversight of the work
for the site characterization, feasibility study, remediation action plan, site
remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits. These costs
are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two ways described
below. It is your responsibility to select the method of oversight cost recovery under
the terms of the (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement 6Ut$on. These
options ONLY pertain to costs associated with oversight.
(A) STATE CONTRACT
The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program provides a mechanism for.
the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the
necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this state
contract. The State will then charge you, a responsible party, for both the costs
incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site.
(B) COUNTY LOCAL AGREEMENT
Kern County Environmental Health is providing this'option for those who prefer to
pay the County directly and avoid the addition of State costs. Prior to the Caunty's
performance of services, this option requires.your deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand
dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for
County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party
must enter into a County agreement, attachment "B".
To safeguard the environment, the environmental sensitivity (Attachment "C") of this
site has been reviewed by Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for
groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non-environmentally sensitive
may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an
environmentally'sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Option Agreement;
however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Option Agreement,
should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex
hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the
State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this
right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally Sensitive
area.
It is necessary for you to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of
receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice:
either the State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the
County's Local Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure "B", and return
it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County of
Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300,
Bakersfield, CA 93301, Attention: Underground Storage Tank Contract Administrator.
If you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made this selection
and that you have read attachment "D", the official notification, in a letter sent to
the address indicated above.
Failure to respond in writing to this notice within ten (10) calendar days will
automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under
the terms of the State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Enclosure
"D" will then serve as the official notification of your enrollment into the State
Pilot Program for Underground StOrage Tan~s.
If you should.have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon,
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
2?00 'M' $~reec. Ere. 300
8akers~fie]d. CA 93301
(805) 861-~36
Mr. Mike Daniels
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
KERN COUNTY
Environmental He~ith Department
ATTACHMENT "D"
SUBJECT:
Location: 121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
Known As: Sparkle Cleaners
PERMIT #: 140006
Dear Mr. Mike Daniels:
This letter will serve as the official notification concerning reimbursement
requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Pilot Program. As ~mentioned in the introductory letter, by either not responding to this
package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract
option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below:
Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance
Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency administrative and oversight costs
associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas
the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above
site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and
Whereas the above individual(s) or entity(ies) have been identified as the party or
parties responsible for investigation and cleanup of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED that pursuant to Section 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above
Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board
for all direct and indirect costs incurred by any and all state and local agencies
while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site, and the above
Responsible Party or Parti-es shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of
receipt of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Nilon,
contract manager, at (805) 861-3636~
Sincerely, ~'~.
Mary Weddell
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Environmental Health
attachments
I N C. O R P O R A T .E D
HYDRAULIC
BRAKE
SYSTEMS
AND
COMPONENTS
For Mobile and Industrial Equipment
2-_
OMB No. 2050--0039 (ExpireSon~l["/ '. * *". ' - *: -: ........ ~* ": ........ . .......... : *':. ' * ~** . · .' · ~* * Sacramento, California
· r type. (Form designed for use o~'~~1~ 2-pitch typewriter). . . . _
-- - Manifest
JNIFORM
HAZARDOUS
' I .... "': ' ~ Document No. :~:~:!/:'.o, ;-?':':-:1 ,:ia not required by Federallaw.::.?~
i. Generator's US EPA ID No. L.2.;...P. age..!..l'~.lnformation'in'the sha~Jed
WASTE MANIFEST ~ >1 ,.".1 .,q'~l ~. 'Il ;?1 -~ Ti Gl I I~J .~f ~
' A. State Manifest Document
........... ,....
.............................. : :;~,:.~:_ ..... ......~ ....... ~:.:~: '*.:,~r.*:~7~:~5:~-C~:.':
..... ........ .. '. , . I I t
.5. Transpolar 1 Company Name ': ' 6. = US EPA ID Number C. State Transp~f's'lD .*~ ~ .....
7. Transpolar 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number. . E. State ~rans~ef'a ID .... T:' -'
G. State Fac~'s ID .... .~,~-~.:,:-.-==...-~
/ 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number . ..'.-. ' -. : {: : T ::
: ~' C :~-d .*. ~ H. Facili~'s Ph~e
; 12. Containers 13. Total 14. . ~ I. . .:,..
, Quanti~ ' Unit .-':~*': Waste No.
11. US DOT Description (including Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Number) ' Wt/Vo *.:' ~ ~ ·
No.
Type
., State
~ : ..~..~ .~ ~'~..~: ~ -..-.~: .
State
' ' ' : ~ : * * EPAl~her
: I I I I I I.I
State
d. : ~ :
..... : . . EPA/Other ..... · -
J Add tional Descr pt ohs for Mater a 8 L sled Above ' . ......... ~ Handling C~es f~ Wastes Listed Above
- . ~ :.' · · .. ;~:.':' : , · : '. : .' a..::'. : ~ b. ....~, -.--.
· ~.,.,::. :~' :: ~..' .:.-.:.::::.~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .~:.'- :. ===================================== ?~.-:.:....::: ..... :- . . ...: . ... ~ ~
.' .~.:". ~,': *'~ ~: ..:....%..~.~: ,: .,..:~:::~:.~.::...=~:;~...... ~. ,. ....... ~ '.:.-~... ,-*. .... .. . -~-:. .:':: .......... ':, ~: ':::.¥:~*;:?~S~:..":.*..:':.:: : L' ' C .... ..:.~.:'~ ~:: ..*~.~. .d ......
'.;:;: ":' :::.'. :"-':.':.: '. :' ' :.: .:.' ====================== :: ?:.'..;.~:::.-.: .... ' ".':: "..':.; =================================== :.:~: ================================
15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information . ....... : . -.-:..:~.*: ". -- ~::' '
-~ _ : ~: ~"
~/~'~' ,-'~ ~; . : :. ..... . - _
~'?.':': ::'< ~' '?=' ,_,7/~.'~: - ~:-:..~";~' .' =:: · ~ :'
16. '
GENERATOR'~ CERTIPICATION: I hereby d~clare that t~e contents of t~is consignment are fully and a~curately ~esc~ibed:abov~ by prope~ ~ipping
name ~nd are classified, p~cked, marked;, a~d. labeled, ~nd are in all re,pecks in prope~ ~ondition for transpo~ by hi~h~Y~, according to applicable
international and national government regulations. ~ ' ~ '
If I am a large ~ua~tity ~enerator, I ce~i~ t~at I b~ve a program in ~lace to reduce t~e volume and toxicity of ~aste ~ene~ated to the ~e~ree I have
determined to be economically practicable and that I bav~ ~elected fha ~ractic~ble m~tho~ ~ ~reafment. stora~e, or ~is~s~ e..~P~fi7 ~v~i~e
me whic~ minimizes t~e present ~nd future t~eat to ~ma~ ~ealth ~d the envi~o~ment~ OR, if I am a small ~uantity ~ene~ator, I have made a ~ood
fait~ effo~ to minimize my waste ~eneration and select tbs best ~aste management method that is available to me and t~at I can afford.
~ ~ Printed/Typed Name., . . . .. ~ Signature../.'?..",?,."' "":; ~:'"' ,:, :~'"' ':/'" ' ': "''
T 17. Transp~er I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials .. ~...... · . ,.
R I . Month Day Year
A Printed/Typed Name~ Signature ' "
~ 18. Transpolar 2 Acknowledgement 0f Receipt of Materials
Printed/Typed Name [ Signature Month Day Year
:
~. Discrepancy Indication Space
'~wner or Operator Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as no?d in Item~,19.
Month Day Year
K.)r.:i
-"J GREEN: HAULER RETAII~'S INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BACK
· are obsolete.
· EMERGENCY OR SPILL. CALL THE NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER 1-800-424-8802; WITHIN CALIFORNIA CALL 1-800-852-75E, O
,?oo F~w~ S~eot ncRN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN · H~ALTH OFfiCER
- Bake~afiatd, California 93305 Leon M Hebe~on, M.D.
Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
~-~.~ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
f~~x~ Vernon S. Reichard
Facility Name P; ~ Kern County Permit #
· * UNDgROROUND 'TANK DISPOSITION TRACKING RECORD * *
This form is to be' returned to the Kern County Health Department within
~ o£ acceptance of tank(s) by disposal7 or recycling facility. The
holder of the permit, with n~ber noted above is responsible for Insuring
that. this for~ Is completed ~d returned·
Section I - To be' filled out ~ tank removal contractor:
Tank Removal Contractor:
Addre.. V O8 0IC_ /
Date Tanks Removed
~ction 2 - To be filled out ~ cea r ctor "deconta inattn~'tank(s)~
.o. of Tank.
Tank "Decontsalnatlon" Contractor
Authorized representative of contractor certifies by signing belo~ that
accordance elth Kern County l/ealth
Tltle
tank(s) have been decontaminated
........ an t
.......................... 'n e of i'.,'
Section 3 - To be filled out and si~ned bj[ __ authorized e res
treatment, storaEe, o_Er dlsvosal facility acceptinE tn,ak(s): .' "".'
Title
,'-
N°.'''. of Tanks ~-' '
(Authorized Representative).
MAILIN6 INSTRUCTIONS: Fold In half and' staple. Postage-:.a~d'" nailing
label have already been afflxed to outside for your convenience. '""".'~:
(Form #iINMP-150} ' ols'n%r
CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING
November 20, 1988
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTF,~
his. Janis Lehman
Kern County Health Department
Environmental Health Division
2700 "M" Street
BaKersfield, CA 93301
Re: Site Characterization Proposal
SparKle Cleaners
De ar his. Lehman;
Attached is a copy of the "Site Characterization
Proposal for SparKle Cleaners on hionterey Street.,
BaKersfield, for your review.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Respectfully Submitted,
4000 EASTON DRIVE SUITE 16 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 [805} 323-6460 FAX 323-4723
SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROPOSAL
FOR
SPARKLE CLEANERS
121 MONTEREY STREET
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:
John R. Wilson and Associates
4000 Easton Drive, Suite 16
Bakersfield, California 93309
SI TE CHARACTERI ZATI ON WORI<PLAr-4
Ba,:Kqround/Site Hi story
On August !!, 19'88 McNabb C:onstruction Company of BaKers. field
removed two-ten thousand gal l on underground gas. ol i ne tanks located
near the northeast corner of SparKle Cleaners at 121 Monterey Street.
After. removal of the tanks., B.C. Laboratories procurred four
samples from the soil under the tanks, two samples from the soil under
the product 1 ines and tv~o samples from the soil under/near the west
end of the dispenser' island.
The soil samples were delivered to B.C. Laboratories for
constituent analysis. The samples were analyzed for TPH and BTX. All
samples were "None Detected" for all constituents except for the two
samples procurred from under the west end of the dispenser island.
The analysis for the island follows;
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
p-Xyl ene
m-Xyl ene
o-Xyl erie
Isopropyl Benzene
Pet. Hydrocarbons
Total Pet. Hydrocarbons
4.80 2.63
u g/g :.
ug/g 16.13 50.67
' 25.84 82 56
ug/g ,,, ·
ug/g , 55.64 166.14
ug/g 80.91 238.29
ug/g 79.98 235.63
ug/g 17.53 8.2.98
ug/g 993.02 2807.34
ug/g 1273.85 3'6&6.25
The site is served by California Water Service Company. The
depth to the unconfined aquifer in this area is approximately 126
feet.
Samptinq Proposal
Due to the overhanging canopy it is proposed to use an
"extendahoe" backhoe for obtaining soil samples. Three test holes are
proposed at the locations indicated on the attached "Facility Plat".
The holes would be excavated to a depth of approximately sixteen feet.
Soil samples would be taken at depths of; 7', 10' 13'
, and bottom of
excavation. Soil would be collected from the bucket of the backhoe.
Care would be taken to gather the soil from the "interior" of the soil
in the bucket. The collected soil would be placed into glass "Hason
Jars", capped and taped. The samples would be labeled with a sample
number, boring number, and depth, and placed in a plastic bag. The
ba~ged sample would be stored on ice, and transported to B.C.,--
Laboratories along with chain-of-custody documentation.
Samples would be analyzed for BTX constituents, including TPH
(gasoline).
-1-
Page 2
SparK! e Cleaners
November 30~ 1988
During sampling a "hYdrocarbon meter" would be used to ascertain
if contamination existed in the soil. This would assist in
determining which sample to analyze.
If the "meter" detected hydrocarbons in the bottom of the
excavation, then the first sample analyzed would be at the bottom of
the excavation.
If significant hydrocarbon contamination exists at the bottom of
the excavation, it would be proposed to use a 'slant" drill rig for
procurring samples to a maximum depth of forty-feet. The "slant'
drill rig would be used for drill ing under the overhanging canopy.
After completion of drill ing,. the holes would be bacKfilled with
a combination of bentonite and native soil.
No underground sampling is proposed in this worKplan.
An engineering technician will be present during the site.
drilling to r.ecord observations, provide field screening of sa~hples,
procure samples,, and to complete soil logs of the excavations..
Health'and Safety
Common sense measures to safeguard personnel at the site will be
observed. This includes the use of boots, hard hats, gloves, and
safety glasses at a minimum.
Final Reportinq
This office will submit copies of the sample analysis sheets to
the Kern County Health Department within 3 days of receipt of from
B.C. Laboratories. Within two weeks of their receipt we will submit a
report of our findings which will include the following; description
of activities and observations, soil logs, cross-section, mitigation
alternatives, sample analysis sheets, and chain-of-custody forms.
SPARKLE CLEANERS SITE
STATE ROUTE 178
140NTEREY
~PROPOSED
~ ~ / ~~/~{~ ~CK~OE
2?00 'M' Streec, Ice. 300
8akersfi~]d. Ci 93301
(805) 861-~6'36
KERN COUN~
Envirenmenrml Health DeparmerL'c
February 14, 1989
Mike Daniel
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey St.
Bakersfield, CA
93305
Re: Site Characterization Proposal for Sparkle
Monterey St., Bakersfield
Permit #A750-14
Cleaners, 121
Dear Mr. Daniels:
This department has reviewed the site characterization
proposal prepared by John Wilson of Wilson and Associates for the
above referenced facility.
The work described in this proposal will be acceptable for the
initial investigation of the full extent of contamination at this
contamination an addendum to this proposal mUs~ be ~ubmi~ ~8
this department.
After all samples have been retrieved and analyzed a final
report describing the full extent of. contamination at this site
must be submitted to this'department within SO days. This report
must discuss the remediation alternatives available for this site.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Lehman
Environmental Health Specialist
Hazardous Materials Management Program
JL:dr
2-14-89
staff.haz\daniel.ltr
cc:
John Wilson
Mary Weddell
'~)S'11:11~ 0~IC£S
Delano · ~mont · ~ke ~' '~lla · Moiave · Ridgecrest · Shafter · ~ft
2700 M Street
Bakersfield, California
Mailing Address:
1415 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
(805) 861-3636
.,ERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEI~,
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
October 7, 1988
Mike Daniel
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Daniel:
This department has recently reviewed the laboratory results for the
Sparkle Cleaners facility located at 121 Monterey Street in Bakersfield.
These results indicate that a significant amount of hydrocarbon
contamination is present at this site near the dispenser island. A site
characterization study is necessary in order to determine the full extent
of the contamination.
Enclosed is this department's outline for a site characterization
study. A site characterization proposal must be submitted to this
department within 30 days from the date of this letter. The proposal
must be approved by this department prior to initiating any work.
If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861-3636.
Sincerely,
Janis Lehman
Environmental Health Specialist
Hazardous Materials Program
JL:cas
cc: File
DISTRICT OFFICES
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT
EMERGENCY HAS STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICEES :: i ~0 R LOC~ ~ ~k G E N C ~ U ~ ~ ! O N IJ'Yiiiiiiii}! ii?:ii.i}iii::::::::::::::::i::ili::i:: ::i::ii::i~iiiiiiiiiiiii~i:~i:ii~iii:::::~i::~::iiiiiii::i::i::i:::::iiiiiiii:i~i::ii::iiiii~iii~i~i~iii
REPORT
BEEN
FILED
?
' NAME OF iNDIVIDUAL FILING REPORT I PHONE ' V "'
~MP~Y OR AGEN~ N~E
~ .~.RESE~G ~ OW.S~OP~TOR ~ R~O~Lm*.D
~ ADDRESS ~ '
~AOILI~ NA~ E (IF APPLIOABL~ PERAT . I
-- ADDRESS
~ CROSSS~RE~ ' [ ~OFAR~ ~MERC~L ~ ,NDUSTR~L ~ RUR~ m ~o~us,.~s~ ~ RETAaLFU~LSTA~ON
~ L~AL AGENCY AGENCY NAME ~NTACT PER~N P~NE
(1) NAME QU~T~ LOST (G~LONS)
u~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~No~
~ ~ UNKNO~
~z DATE DISCOVERED /~ ~WDI~VERED ~ IN~ORY~ROL ~ SU~URF~E MONITOR~G ~ NUISA~E~NDIT~NS
~ SOURCE OF DISCHARGE T~KS ONLY~I~ MA~RI~ CAUSE(S)
PIPINGLE~ AGE YRS ~ mRROSION _~ UNKNOm
~E~ ONE ONLY
o~ NDE~RMINED ~ SOILONLY ~ GROUNDWAmR ~ DRINKINGWA~R-(CHECKONLYIFWAmR~LLSHAVEACm~LYBEENAFFECmD)
CHECK ONE ONLY
~ NO~TIONT~EN ~ POST ~NUP MONITORING IN P~RE~ ~ ~FUN~AVAI~TOPR~ED ~ EV~UATI~C~UP~RNATI~S
CHECK ~PROPRIATE ACTON(S) (SEE BACK FOR ~TAILS)
~ $ ~ C~ Sim (CD) ~ EX~VAm & O~POSE (ED) ~ REMO~ FREE PRODmT(FP) ~ ENmmEDBIO DEG~ATION (1~
~ ~ CONTAINMENT BARRIER (~) ~ EX~VA~&TREAT(E~ ~ PUMP&TR~TGROUNDWA~R(G~ ~ REP~CE SUPPLY (RS)
~ TR~TMENTATH~P(HU) ~ NO ACTION REQUIRED (NA) ~ O~ER(O~
HSO~(4~
2700 M STREET
MAILING ADDRESS
1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301
(805) 861-3636
PERI~IT FOR PEPuMANENT ~LOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN!
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M,D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
PERMIT NUMBER A750-14
SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS:
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS:
Sparkle Cleaners
121 Monterey Street
Bakersfield, CA
Phone #($05) 325-1241
CONTRACTOR:
McNabb Construction Company
7808 Olcott Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
License No. 474337
Phone #(805) 399-474~
PEP~tIT FOR CLOSURE OF PERMIT EXPIRES October 27, 1988
2 TANK(S) AT ABOVE APPROVAL DATE July 27, 1988
LOCATION. APPROVED BY
(j~Janl s Leh~ad
..................... POST ON PREMISES .............. ' ....
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOW:
1. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to obtain permits which may be
required by other regulatory agencies prior to beginning work.
2. Permittee must obtain a City Fire Department permit prior to initiating
closure action.
3'. Tank closure activities must be per Kern County Health and Fire Department
approved methods as described in Handout #UT-30.
4. A minimum of four samples must be'retrieved one third of the way in from
the ends of each tank at depths of approximately two feet and six feet.
5. If any contractors or disposal facilities other than those listed on permit
and/or permlt application are to be utilized, prior approval must be
granted by the specialist listed on the permit.
6. A minimum of two samples must be retrieved at depths of approximately two
feet and slx feet for every 15 linear feet of pipe run and also near the
dispenser area(s).
DISTRICT OFFICES
Isabella Moiave · Rldqecrest Shafter
PERMIT FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE
OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANOES STORAGE FACILITY
PERMIT NUMBER A750-14
ADDENDUM
7. All (leaded/unleaded) gasoline samples must be analyzed for benzene,
toluene, xylene, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. All diesel samples must
be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons and benzene.
8. Copies of transportation manifests must be submitted to the Health
Department within five days of waste disposal.
9. All applicable state laws fo~ hazardous waste disposal, transportation, or
treatment must be adhered to. The Kern County Health Department must be
notified before moving/or disposing of any contaminated soil.
10. Permtttee is responsible for making sure' that "tank disposition tracking
record" issued with this permit is properly filled out and returned within
14 days of tank removal.
11. Advise this office of the time and date of the proposed sampling with 24
hours advance notice.
12. Results must be submitted to this 'office within three days of analysis
completion.
ACCEPTED DATE
AGRI£U~
CIt£MIC,41 AiVAL YS/S
PE I'ROI
ABORATORIES, In .
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MCNABB CONSTRUCTION
78O80LCOTT ~VENUE.
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-1
SPARKLE CLEANERS
NORTH TANKE. HOLE 2'
25-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
il-Aug-88
DATEANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Minima
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
P-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g
Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
NoneDetected
None Detected
None Detected
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
None Detected
None Detected
0.10
5.00
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S.
Dry Matter Basis
None Detected
T.P.H. for Gasoline
0.10
PETROLE[~ HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile ~drocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCAR~NS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AGi~ICUL TURE
£t~EMICA/ A~/AI YSIS
PE Tt~OL EIJ/~
&BORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MCNABB CONSTRUCTION
7808 OLCOTT AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
Date of
Report: 25-Aug-88
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-2 l
SPARKLE. CLEANERS
NORTH TANK E. HOLE 6'
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
Il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ T..,~,2~:
11-Aug- 88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Minirr~.~
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-X¥1ene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g
Pet. Hyd~v~carbons ug/g
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.00
Total Petroleum
Hyd~arbons ug/g
None Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Cor~nents:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile ?~drocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
'~TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-c?~orin-
at~]] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AGI~I£UL TU~9£
~fEMICA/ A/VA/Y$15
P£TROL£U~
LABORATORIES, Inc..
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MCNABB CONSTRUCTION
7808 OLCOTT ~VENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
Date of
Report: 25-Aug-88
Lab No.:
Ssmple Desc:
6032-3
SPARKLE CLEANERS
NORTH TANK W. HOLE 2'
DATE SAMPLE
COLLEC'rED:
Il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
il-Aug-88 '
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Mini~m,
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Datected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0. l0
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0. l0
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
I sopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarborm ug/g
None Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Comments:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (Cl to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] ~onstituents on this report.
Analyst
AGRIt'UL TUR~
Clt£MICA~ A~VAL YSI$
· P£TROL£UM
-ORATORIES, Int_;.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
MCNABB CONSTRUCTION
7808 OLCOTT 'AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
P~rgeable Aromatics
[SOIL)
Date of
Report: 25-Aug-88
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-4
SPARKLE CLEANERS
NORTH TANKW. HOLE 6'
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
il-Aug-88
DATE ANALySIs
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Mini~n
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p, Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detecte~] O. 10
Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5. O0
Total Petrole~zm
Hydrocarbons ug/g
None 'Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Con'J'nents:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present'(C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined con this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-c?~orin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
£H£MICAI ANAl )'SIS
LABORATORIES, In(:::.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGII.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
McNABB CONSTRUCTION
7808 OLCOTT ~VENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Dasc:
6032-5
SPARKLE CLEANERS
SOUTH TANK E. HOLE 2'
25-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
11-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
Il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Minimum
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene .ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g
Pet. Hy~trocarbons ug/g
None Detected
None Detected
None Datected
None Datected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.00
Total Petrole~r~
Hydrocarbons ug/g
None Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Corrments:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the ~constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [nonhchlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AGRI£UL
£/./£A41CAI A~/AI YS/$
P£Tf~OL Et/It ~
-- ORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
MCNABB CONSTRUCTION
7808 OLCOTT ~VENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308
Attention: BRYAN MCNABB
Date of
Report: 25-Aug-88
Lab No.'
Sample Desc:
6032-6
SPARKLE CLEANERS
SOUTH TANK E. HOLE 6"
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ ~:
il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
24-Aug-88
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Minimum
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g None Datected 0.10
Isopropyl
Benzene ng/g None Detected 0.10
Pet. Hy~lrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Petroleum
Hydrc~arbons ug/g
None Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: CAlifornia D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Co~r~ents:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCA~NS: The S,~, total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Analyst
AG~I£UI TI/RE
£/'/£/~/CA[ A/VA/YSIS
P£T/IO/£1./M ~
LABORATORIES, Inc..
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Arorrmtics
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour ~ve.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-7
Sparkle Cleaners
South tank W. hole 2'
29-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
il-Aug-88
.DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
11-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Reporting Analysis
Constituent Units Results
Minimt~
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected
Toluene ug/g None Detected
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected
o-X¥1ene ug/g None Detected
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detect~]
Pet. Hy~lrr~arbons ug/g None Detected
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.00
Total Petrole,ma
Hydrocarbons ug/g
None Detected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for ~asoline
Dry Matter Basis
C~rfrr~nts:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarh~ns are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLE~UM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this re~rt.
/. ,' zd'_~, ~7
Analyst
A~
CttE~I£At A~/AI YSIS
t~E l'flOl EUM
LABORATORIES, Inc.
! J.J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
14100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour Ave.
Bakersfield, CA
Attention:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
Il-Aug-88
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
93308 '
Bryan McNabb '
6032-8
Sparkle Cleaners
South tank W. I hole 6'
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@LAB:
ii-Aug-88
Date of
Report: · 29-Aug-88
Reporting
Constituent Units
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-Xylene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g.
o-Xylene ug/g
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g
Pet. Hydrocarbons ,~/g
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Analysis
Results
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detect~]
None Detected
None Detect~]
T.P.H. for Gasoline
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S.
Dry Matter Basis
~Tr~ents:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: ~,~antification of volatile ~drocarbons
present (C1 to C20) ~utilizi~'a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum ~r~tal of all [non-cb]orin-
ated] constituents on this report.
Minirr~m
Reporting
Level
Analyst
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.00
0.10
CH£~ICA~ AIVAL YSI$
PE TflOL £UM
LABORATORIES, I C.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour~ve.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Date of
Report: 29-Aug-88
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-9
Sparkle Cleaners
Lines 2'
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
Il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Reporting Analysis
ConstiO~ent Units Results
Minirr~
Reporting
Level
Benzene ug/g
Toluene ug/g
Ethyl Benzene ug/g
p-X¥1ene ug/g
m-Xylene ug/g
o-Xylene ug/g
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g
Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.00
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons ug/g
None Detect~]
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Con~Tr_~nts:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrc~arbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizir~ a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrc~arbons ~ in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on tkis report.
Analyst
AG~ICU~ TUR£
£~E/~I~'A/ AlgAl YSIS
PETROLEUM
LABORATORIES, InC.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour ~ve.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-10
Sparkle Cleaners
Lines 6'
29-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
il-b/g-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED @ LAB:
il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Mini~,~n
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Toluene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g None Detected 0.10
o-X¥1ene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g None Detected 0.10
Pet. Hydrocarbons ug/g None Detected 5.00
Total Petroleum
Hydr¢~ar~ns ug/g
None [~tected
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
CoT~nts:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Q~antification of volatile ?~drocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarh~ns are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLE[~ HYDR£CARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorin .....
ated] constituents on t~s report.
Analyst
AG/U£UI
£tlE/~I£A/ A/VA/ Y$1S
PETROl EII/~
LABORATORIES, Inc.
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable Aromatics
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour Age.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Date of
Report;
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-11
Sparkle Cleaners
Island 2'
29-Aug-88
DATE S~PLE
COLLECTED:
il-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@LAB:
Il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Minir~m
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 4.80 0.10
Toluene ug/g 16.13 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 25.84 0.10
p-Xylene ug/g 55.64 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g 80.91 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g 79.98 0.10
Isopropyl
Benzene ug/g 17.53 0.10
Pet. Hydro. carbons ug/g 993.02 5.00
Total Petrole~n
Hydrocarbons ug/g
1273.85
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Colwoents:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizing a gasoline factor. As outline]by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total~of all [non-chlorin-
ated] constituents on this report.
~J. t~J:. Eg~in Analyst
AGRI£U/TU#E
£1t£MICA/ AIiIA/ YSIS
PETRO[ EUM
LABORATORIES,
J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR.
4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308
PHONE 327-4911
Purgeable A~matics
(SOIL)
McNabb Construction
4204 Amour Ave.
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Attention: Bryan McNabb
Date of
Report:
Lab No.:
Sample Desc:
6032-12
Sparkle Cleaners
Island 6'
29-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
COLLECTED:
11-Aug-88
DATE SAMPLE
RECEIVED@ LAB:
Il-Aug-88
DATE ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
26-Aug-88
Mini~m~
Reporting Analysis Reporting
Constituent Units Results Level
Benzene ug/g 2.63 0.10
Toluene ug/g 50.67 0.10
Ethyl Benzene ug/g 82.56 '0.10
p-Xylene ug/g 166.14 0.10
m-Xylene ug/g 238.29 0.10
o-Xylene ug/g 235.63 0.10
Isoprop¥1
Benzene ug/g 82.98 0.10
Pet.Hyd~arbons ug/g 2807.34 5.00
Total Petrole~.
Hydrocarbons ug/g
3666.25
0.10
TEST METHOD: California D.O.H.S. T.P.H. for Gasoline
Dry Matter Basis
Confronts:
PETROLEI~ HYDROCARBONS: Q~tification of volatile ~drocarbons
present (C1 to C20) utilizir~ a gasoline factor. As outlined by
California D.O.H.S. These volatile hydrocarbons are 'in addition
the constituents specifically defined on this report.
?OTAL PETROLEI~ HYDRC~ARBONS: The s~n total of all [non-chlorin-
atoll] consti~3aents on this report.
Analyst
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF EN¥IRONMENTAL HEALTH
17OO FLOWER STREET. BAKERSFIELD. CA
(805) 861-3636
93305
INTERNAL USE ONL~j~
PTO PTA
APPLICATION [FATE
THIS APPLICATION IS.FOR
APPLICATTON FOR PERMIT FOR PERMANENT
CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT OF UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTA~WCES $TORAOI~ FAC]:LTTY
REMOVAL. OR F~ ABANDONMENT IN PLACE (PILL ON._.~E
OUT
APPLICATION
PER
FACILITY)
NIGHTS~ INF.~. R~ST CROSS STRAET'
:'ROPOSED ~'ROJEC? STARTING DATE {CALIF~ORNIA~ LI~ENSI ~ {MORKER'S CO~tPENS~,',T~QN {
'"" INSURER
~ORKER'S COMPENSATION { ,.;
PHONE
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MATERIALS STORED
TANK # .VOLUME C.HBMIS~L ST0~J~D (NON?C.O~U4ERC~AL
MA~E )
DATES STORED C HEMICA. L~SLY STORE~
TO
To
TO
TO
~EAREST ~ATER ~ELL - IVE DIST~CE ~D DESCRIBE TYPE IF HITIIIN 5OO FEET
__ pROV[O~ I~FOR~T[OH REQUESTED O~ REVERSE SID~ OF ~HI$ SHEET BEFORE SUBMI~ING APPLICATION FOR REVIE~
'ROVIDE DRAWING OF PHYSICAL L" 'UT OF FACI-LITY USING SPACE PROV-'O BELOW.
~T,T. OF THE FOLLOWING INFORM~TIuN MUST BE INCLUDED IN ORDER FOR ~ ,?PLICATION TO BE
~ROCESs~ TANK(S), PIPING & DISPENSER(S), INCLUDING LENGTHS AND DIMENSIONS
J PROPOSED SAMPLING I/DCATIONS DESIGNATED BY THIS SYMBOL "(~"
NEAREST STREET OR INTERSECTION
ANY WATER .WELLS OR SU .RFACE WATERS WITHIN 100'
NORTH ARROW
-I
RADIUS 'OF FACILITY
/.
/ 1700 Flower Street
/
Bakersfield, California 93305
Telephone (805) 861-3636
KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENI
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTERIM PERMIT
TO OPERATE:
UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
STORAGE FACILITY
HEALTH OFFICER
Leon M Hebertson, M.D.
DIRECTOR OF ENVlRONMENTA~ HEALTH
Vernon S. Reichard
PERMI T~i 4OOO6C
ISSUED: JULY 1, 1986
EXPIRES: JULY 1, 1989
NUMBER OF TANKS= 9_
FACILITY: I OWNER:
SPARKLE CLEANERS I RICHARD K. NEWMAN & ASSOCIATES
121 MONTEREY I 121 MONTEREY
BAKERSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305
TANK # AGE(IN YRSk SUBSTANCE CODE
1,2 UNK MVF 3 UNK
PRESSURIZED PIPING?
NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT
N'ON-- TRANSFERABLE ~ ~ ~ POST ON PREMISES
DATE PERMIT MAlT,ED:
JUL 2 1 1986,
DATE PERMIT CHECK LIST RETURNED:
Kern County Health Departmen/
Division or Environmental Hea.a~·
1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA
93305
Permit
Application
ae
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY
Type of Application (check):
[]Ne--~ Facility [-]Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility pTransfer of Ownership
~mergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone):
Nights ~4~
Facility Name ~~ ~~%.f No. of Tanks
· [~Gasollne
Type of Business (check): Station ~Oth~ (deSCribe) ~]%~4f(4~a~'~ ~-~
Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [-]yes ~No '
Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? []yes ~NO
Nearest Cross St. ~"/a~
Facility Address ~ ~ ~4~~ ~
T R SEC (RUral Locations Gnly)
;~kiress F~ ~F~"~. Zip ~ ~ ~%' Telephone ~_A~i
Operator Contact Person
Addr ess Zip Telephone
Water tn Facility Provided by
Soil Characteristics' at Facility
Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth' Determi'nati6n~
Depth to' Groundwater
Ce
Contractor
Address
Proposed St~ar~lng Date
Worker's Ccmpensation Certification
CA Contractor's License NO.
Zip Telephone
Proposed CCmpletion Date
Insurer
D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications
Proposed .........
Tank(s) Store (check all that apply):
Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehicle
Unleaded Regular Premi~ Diesel Waste
Y-'uel ~
[] [] [] B la
[] [] []
Chemical Ccmposit:ion of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fuels)
Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) CAS ~ (if known) Chemical Previously Stored
( if different)
Transfer of Ownership
Date of ~-~nsfer
Previous Facility Name
I,
n~'i'fy or terminate the
Previous Owner
accept fully all obl'ig'at'ions 'of l~rmit NO. __ issued to
I understand that th- Permitting Authority may review and
t~ansfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergrou~d storage
facility upon receiving this c~mpleted form.
This form has been c~mpleted under penalty of
true and correct.
Signature ~
perjury and to the best of my knowledge is
Facility Name ~.' Permit
TANK ~ / (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM Fbi, ~7~ TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ;%Lt. APPROPRIATE BOXES
1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted [~Non-Vaulted []Double-Wall []Single-Wall
2. ~ Material
Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel []Polyvinyl Chloride []-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Al~m~in~m~ [] Bronze ~Unknown
Other (describe)
3. Primary Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. Tank Secor{dar~ Contairm~ent
[]Double-Wall ~ Synthetic Liner
[]Other (describe):
[]Material
5. Tank Interior Lining
---~Rubber [-]Alkyd []Epoxy
[]Other (describe):
6. Tank Corrosion Protection
10.
[]Lined Vault
Thickness (Inches)
Iq None []unknown
Manufacturer:
Capacity (Gals.)
[]Phenolic [-]Glass []Clay [t~lined D1.~known
--]~Galvanized -~-~-~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap []vinyl Wrapping
[]']Tar or Asphalt DUnknown [-]None []Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: DNone []Impressed Current System ['~saCrificial ;~node System
Describe System & Equipment:
Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception.
a. Tank: Dvisual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitorirg' Well(s) DVadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) ['1U-Tube Without Liner'
D~u-Tube with Ccmpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring We.il(s)*
Vapor Detector* []Liquid Level Sensor* D Conductivit~ Sensor*
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank
[] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space
D Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testing
[] None [] Unknown [] Other
b. Piping: ~lFlow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping'
[]Monitoring Sump with Raceway DSealed Concrete Raceway
[]Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Raceway []None
[] Unknown [] Other
*Describe Make & Model:
~en Tightness Tested?
Date of Last Tightness Test
Test Name
Tank ~
-~.~
Tank Repaired? []Yes []No /x~Unknown
Da te (s) · of Repa i r (s)
Describe Repairs
DYes []No DUnknown
Results of Test
Testing Ccmpany
Overfill Protection
[]Operator Fills, COntrols, & Visually Monitors 5.vel
DTape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves D Auto Shut- Off Controls
[]Capacitance Sensor DSealed Fill Box [-]None [Unknown
[]Other: List Make & Model For.Above Devices
11.
Piping ~
a. Underground Piping: ~Yes [~NO .~known Material
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
[]Pressure []Suction []Gravity Approximate L~ngth Of Pipe Run
b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection :
[]Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad [qImpressed Current [-]Sacrificial Anode
olyethyle.ne Wrap [Electrical Isolation [qVinyl Wrap [-]Tar or Asphalt
nknown [-]None []-]Other (describe):
c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containment:
[~Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner System []None ~/Unknown
[-]Other (describe):
Facility Name
T__~_~ ,~_ _~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM__ ,, TANK)
FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES
1. Tank is: [qVaulted []Non-Vaulted I-]Double-Wall Ii]single-Wall
2. ~ Material
D Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [-]Polyvinyl Chloride []Fiberglass-Clad Steel
[] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Altm~intm] [] Bronze ~Unknown
[] Other (describe)
3. ~ Containment
Date Installed Thickness (Inches) dapacity (Gallons) Manufacturer
4. Tank Secondary Co~t'ainment
'[]']Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner '[]Lined vault
[~Other (describe):
OMaterial Thickness (Inches)
5. Tank Interior ~
---~Rubber [-]Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic ~]Glass
[]Other (describe):
6. Tank Corrosion Protection
e
e.
[] None []Unknown
Manufactur er:
Capacity (Gals.)
[] Clay []Unlined ~Unkno~
--]~G~ ~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap []Vinyl Wrappir~'
[]Tar or Asphalt []Unknown [[]None [2]Other (describe):
Cathodic Protection: []None []Impressed Current System ['lSa'C'ri'~ic~al ;~9~x]e System
Describe System & Equipment:
Leak Detection, Monito~in~, and Interception
a. Tank: []Visual (vaulted tanks only) [-~Groundwater Monitori~' Wall(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [[]U-Tube Without Liner
[]U-Tube with C~mpatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitorirg Wall(s)*
[] Vapor Datector* [] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivity Sensor*
[] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank'
[] Liquid l%etrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space
[][]Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Periodic Tightness Testing
None[] Unknown ~ Other
b. Piping: Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Pipll~j=
~Monitoring Sump with Raceway · []Sealed Concrete Race~y
[']Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~ay ~']l~)ne
[] Unknown [] Other
*Describe Make & Model:
~en Tightness T~sted?
Date of Last Tightness Test
Test Name
Tank ~
~a--r~Repaired? []Yes []No ~Jnknown
Date(s) of Repair(s)
Describe Repairs
[] Yes []No []Unknown
Results of Test
Testing Company
10. Overfill Protection
[]Operator F['l'ls, Controls, & Visually Monitors I~vel
[]Tape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves [-]Auto Shut- Off Controls
B Capacitance Sensor [']Sealed Fill Box [-]None ~rdnknown
Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices
11. Piping /~/Z~; ?'~ r'~ C.t~ ~'P'
a. Underground Piping: ~es []NO ~UnknOwn Material. ~'
Thickness (inches) Diameter Manufacturer
[]Pressure []Suc~Gravity Approximate [~ngth 6f 'Pipe l~
b. Underground Pipirg Corrosion Protection :
Ce
[]Galvanized []Fiberglass-Clad ~Imp~essed Current []Sacrificial Anode
olyethylene Wrap []Electrical Isolation [[]Vinyl Wrap []Tar or Asphalt
nknown []None []Other (describe):
Underground Pipirg, Secondary Contaim~ent:
[]Double-Wall []Synthetic. Liner System [']None ~known '
[]Other (describe):
PERMIT CHECKLIST
This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received
and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of
monitoring requirements.
Please complete this form and return to. K~HD in the self-addressed envelope provided
within 30 days of receipt.
Check:
Yes No
./
A. The packet I received contained:
1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phase
Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement
Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #G-394.1), Explanation of
Equipment Lists and Return Envelope.
2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-10.
3) The Following Forms:
a) Inventory Recording Sheet ·
b) Inventory Recording Sheet with summary on reverse
c) Trend Analysis Worksheet
4) An Action Chart (to post at facility)
I Interim Permit
Between Owner and
Substance Codes,
B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring
Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and
find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and
address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no"
is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet).
C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): 1) Acceptable gauging instrument
2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s)
3) Water-finding paste
D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to
Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that.the owner of this
facility is the operator (if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between
owner and operator).
E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for al.!' tanks at this facility (if
tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding
tank numbers listed on permit). ~[~ -/~~ i5 ~;~.~'~ ~~,
F. As required on page 6 of Handbook #UT-10, all meters at this facility have had
calibration checks'within the last 30 days and were calibrated b~ a registered
device repairman if out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on
"Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook).
G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance
with procedures described in Handbook #UT-10.
Date Started _~-~r-~_tm~ ~ /~
[~ CALI~RATIUN
DW/M NOTIFIED
Record of Computer ..n.nge, Meter Change, Or Calibration
'. Co,~pa.~
MODEL
TOTALIZER
READINGS
IN~ODUCT
FINhSH
START
TOTAL
GALLONS
CALIBRATION
CHECKED ADJUSTED TO
I F:
TOTALIZEA SEALED METER SEALED
1:3 Y- [] .o ID ,- ID NO
AND MOO~.L
rOTAI IZEH
READINGS
~ODUC!
FINISH
START
Pump #
MONEY
TOTAL
SERIAL NUMEER
GAl
GALLONS
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
IOIAL IZEH SEAL
DYES D NO
10 STORAGE
ADJUSTEr) TO
I Si OW
ME rEA gEALED
iPUMP-MAKE,ANO MODEL
TOT&LIZER
READINGS
FINISH
START*
MONEY
Pump # TOTAL
SERIAL NUMBLR
(.~AI. I (',INS
GALLONS R{.TUflNI'U I0
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
t A'~! SLOW
toTAL IZER SEALED
D YES D NO
METER SEALED
FINISH
1 (.) I ALIZER
READINGS
START
~--"-'~;"".~ ...... Pump #
Pt~MP.MAKE &NO MOOEL
TOTALIZER
READINGS .
~D~r
FINISH
START
S~' I~,IAL NUMOI" R
MONE¥
TOTAL
IMONEY
MONEY
GAl.
(iAi I ()N,~
GALLONS fie IURNt*U 10 :;IORAGL
GALLONS
GALLONS
GALLONS RETURNED TO STORAQE
CALtBRAT ION
AOJUS1 ED TO
CHFCKEL)
M~-I Lfl ~LAL~'U
DYES ON**'
CALIBRATION
FAST
CHECKED
· IsLow
* AOJUSTED TO
FAST ISLOW
METER SEALED
TO1A~IZER SEALED
'1' O TALIZER
READINGS
Pflo[)uC !
FINISH
START
PUmp #
IMONEY
MON£Y
TOTAL
SERIAL NUMOkH
GALLONS
TO SIORAGE
CALIBRATION
CHECKED
METER SEALED
DYES D NO
Facility:
~'~II~TER CALIBRATION
CHECK FORI~
Permit
Note:
1. All meters must have calibration checks a minimum o_~f twice ~ year, which may
include checks done by the. Department of Weights and Measures. . ~
2. Before starting calibration runs, wet the. calibration can with product ~nd
return product to storage.
3. Run 5 gallons with nozzle wide open into the can. Note gallons and cubic
Inches drawn, and return product to storage.
4. Run 5 gallons with the nozzle one-half open Into th~ can. Note gallons and
cubic inches drawn, and return product to storage.
5. After all product for one calibration check is returned to. storage, remember
to record the volume returned to storage in column 9 of the Inventory
Recording Sheet.
6. If 'the volume measured in a 5-gallon calibration can Is more thafi 6.~ cubic
inches above or below the 5-gallon mark, the meter requires calibratiou by a
registered device repairman.
Hose or Tank #/ Fast Flow Slow Flow Volume Returned Calib~
Date/Time'
Pump # Product 52Gallon Draft 5-Gallon Draft to Storage Requ:
Gals Cu. Inches Gals Cu. Inches Gallons Yes
ation Device Repairman Dar
red? Used for Cai ib
No Cai ibration
Owner or Operator Signatuy/
Calibrator's Signature
SUBMIT A COPY OF T~IS FOR~ WITH ANNUA~ R~PORT.
: '" ':3975
46:':"('."i.. -,.,'".:' 4177
"47 '"' ~ 4004
· .'48 ,:~i"":'