HomeMy WebLinkAboutUST-REPORT 10/30/1992I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
Earth Systems Env
ironmental, Inc.
A Member of The Earth Systems Group
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT OF REMEDIAL ACTION
BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
1801 PANORAMA DRIVE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
October 30, 1992
Prepared by
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
6501 McDivitt Drive, Suite B
Bakersfield, California
(805) 836-0901
FAX (805) 836-0911
Project No. EB-8191-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REPORT OF REMEDIAL ACTION
BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE
1801 PANORAMA DRIVE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 'Site Description .......................................................................................... 3
1.2 Project History ....................................................................................... ,...3
1.2.1 Geologic Conditions ........................................................................ 6
1.2.2 Subsurface Conditions ................................................................... 7
1.2.3 Laboratory Analytical Results ..................................................... 7
1.2.4 Conclusions of Initial Assessment ............................................... 8
2.0 BIOREMEDIATION DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING ...................... 9
3.0 PROGRESS SOIL SAMPLING ................................................... ~ ............................. 9
4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF TREATED SOIL ................................. ' ..................... 9
5.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS - TREATED SOIL ............................................................ 10
6.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 10
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 11
8.0 CLOSURE ......................................................................... i ............................. '. ......... 11
Figure 1
Figure 2
APPENDIX A
Vicinity Map ............................................................................... 13
Site Map ........................................................................................ 14
Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
Earth Systems Environmental, Inc.
A Member of The Earth Systems Group
6701 McDivitt Drive, Suite B · Bakersfield, CA 93313 · (805) 836-0901 · FAX.(805) 836-0911
O~tober 30, 1992
Project No.: EB-8191-2
Doc. No.:9210-EO85.RPT
City' of Bakersfield Fire Department
Hazardous Materials Division
2101 H Street
Bakersfield, California 93301
Attention: Mr. Joe A. Dunwoody
SUBJECT:
Reference:
Reference:
Reference:
REPORT OF REMEDIAL ACTION
BAKERSFIELD COl J FGE
1801 PANORAMA DRIVE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
.Preliminary Soil Characterization, Bakersfield College,
(ESE, August 10, :1992)
Soil Characterization Work Plan, Bakersfield College,
(ESE, June 19, 1992)
Tank Closure Report, Bakersfield' College,
(ESE, May 21, 1992)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results' of soil' remediation of 50 Cubic yards of gasoline
impacted sOil excavated from beneath the location, of the gasoline dispenser' and
product pipeline performed' by Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. (ESE) at the above'
referenced site. This soil was excavated as a result of an exploration trench
constructed beneath the former dispenser and product pipeline location in an effort
to assess the vertical and lateral limits of gasoline impacted soil. The excavated soil
has been successfully treated on site using the process of mechanical cultivation
enhancing oxygenation aeration, and biodegradation. Gasoline hydrocarbons are no
longer detected in the excavated soil. Therefore, ESE recommends that the client be
permitted to use the soil for grading fill at the site.
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bakersfield, College
2 October 30, 1992
~The--6~[~ratic~ii--tren~h:i-'~di-d-'ia~t'~i. det~m._~n~-t~he~]imi~---of 'gas61ine hydrocarbons. '~SE
recommends expanded characterization activities using an environmental drilling
rig. Due to the frequent large cobbles and boulders within the Kern River Formation
beneath the site, it is ESE's opinion that the use of a conventional hollow stem auger
rig may be of limited success. The size of the cobbles may also restrict the use of a
reverse air rotary rig. A percussion type hammer rig, or a mud rig have a proven
track record of successfully drilling through the Kern River Formation on the
Panorama Bluffs.
Despite the risks, ESE recommends that Bakersfield College attempt the drilling
operations with a conventional hollow stem auger drill rig. With luck, borings can
be positioned to adequately assess the limits of the gasoline hydrocarbons. Flexibility
will need to be maintained to abandon borings that encounter refusal, and move to
nearby locations. It is ESE's opinion that the cost savings in using this type of rig out
weigh the risks, and an effort should be made to complete the soil characterization
using a conventional holloTM stem auger drill rig.
'The scope of work for this project was developed in conjunction with Mr. Tom
Lockwood of Franzen Hill Corporation rePresenting Bakersfield College and Mr. Joe
Dunwoody of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials 'Division.
In addition, remedial action alternatives are presented. Work performed to remediate
the excavated soil includes the following:
· Placement of the gasoline impacted soil in a twelve inch lift within a
treatment cell.
· Mechanical cultivation increasing oxygenation and enhancing indigenous
soil microbes to reduce the concentrations of the petroleum hydrocarbons to
beneath RWQCB recommended guidelines.
· Progress monitoring and sampling.
· Preparation of this report documenting the successful completion of
remediation activities.
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I Bakersfield, College
! ,,
1.1 Sit,.e Description
3 October 30, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
The site is located at 1801 Panorama Drive in the city of Bakersfield in Kern County,
California (Figure 1). A 3,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank, fuel
dispenser, and associated product pipeline were removed on May 1, 1992 (Figure 2).
The underground storage tank was operated to fuel Bakersfield College's maintenance
department vehicles.
1.2 'Project History
Bakersfield College contracted with Franzen Hill of Tulare, California to remove the
underground fuel storage tank, dispenser, and associated product pipeline at the site.
On May 1, 1992, Franzen Hill removed the tank, dispenser, and associated product
pipeline. The tank was removed under permit with the City of Bakersfield Fire
Department, Hazardous Materials Division.
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
Franzen Hill contracted 'with Earth Systems Environmental to provide an
environmental technician to collect soil samples at the direction of Mr. Joe Dunwoody
with the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division.
One soil sample (TH-i) was collected from beneath the center of the the former tank
location at a depth of 11 feet below surface grade (Figure 2). Two soil samples (TH-2,
and TH-3) were collected from beneath the former product pipeline at a depth of 6
and 4 feet below surface grade, respectively. One soil sample (TH-4) was collected
from beneath the former dispenser at a depth of 4 feet below surface grade. The
samples were collected from the backhoe bucket immediately after soil excavation
and stored in 2" brass tubes, sealed with teflonTM liners and end caps. The samples
were then labeled, handled and transported according to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEP^) protocol to a State of California
Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified laboratory. Sample identification and
chain-of-custody procedures were utilized for the samples to ensure sample integrity
and to document sample possession from the time of collection to its ultimate
EB~8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
Bakersfield, College
4 October 30, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
destination. The' sample label identified the job number, sampler, date and time of
collection and sample number unique to the sample. All sampling equipment was
washed with TSPTM (tri-sodium phosphate) cleanser, pre-rinsed with tap water and a
final rinse of de-ionized Water prior to sampling.
The soil samples designated for chemical analysis were submitted to B C Laboratories
in Bakersfield, a State of California Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified
laboratory. Appendix A presents copies of the analytical results and chain-of-
custody documents. The soil samples v~ere analyzed for Total Purgeable Petroleum
HYdrocarbons as gasoline (TPPHg) using the California DOHS LUFT Method, and for
the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total
xylenes (BTEX) using USEPA Test Method 8020.
Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline and the gasoline constituent
volatile aromatics were not detected at or above the detection limit in the sample TH-1
analyzed from beneath the former undergrOund storage tank. However, TPPH as
gasoline were detected at concentrations of 21 mg/kg, and 4,000 mg]kg from the
samples TH-2 and TH-3. TH-2 was positioned beneath the product pipeline on the side
of the excavation at'a depth of 6 feet, where there was a visual indication questioning
the integrity of the tank. TH-3 was positioned beneath the product pipeline run.
TPPH as gasoline was detected at concentrations of 1,000 rog/kg in sample TH-4 from
beneath the former dispenser. Volatile aromatic compounds were detected in minor
concentrations in samples. TH-2 and TH-3, but were detected in significant
concentrations in TH-4 with benzene detected at 2 mg/kg.
Table 1 presents a summary of the analytical results for TPPH as gasoline, and the
gasoline constituent volatile aromatics in the four soil samples:
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
Bakersfield, College
5 October 30, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1.
(Analytical Results expressed in milligrams per kilogram)
Sample No, De'Pth.' ii TPPH Benzerte [ ] Total
GaSoline I .. [. Toluene Ethyl- . .
benzene. ,...~.
" TH-I' 1I;' I ND I ND I ND .I ND I ND
TH-2., 1. 6' [ 21 '~ [ ND'' [ .. 0.07 .. I 0.07' l. 1.76
" TH-3 .I ' 4' I 4i000. I ND' [ 10'... I ND I 350*
TH-4 4' 1~000 , 2* ,36* , 14 , , 199'
A,L NA, , 17000 1.0 ,1.0 50 50
ND: None Detected at or above minimum reporting level.
NA: Not Applicable
*: exceeds current recommended guidelines.
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board Action Level for contaminants in soil. Action Levels
were calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most stringent current federal or
state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to account for attenuation due to soil
composition and distance from groundwater.
Based on the soil sampling and analysis, detectable concentrations of TPPH as
gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics were not present in the soil
samples collected from beneath the former underground gasoline storage tank.
Ho~veverrZ:gasoliiie~.h~-d~-6~c~bb-n~:~e'r-e-det~Cted.~in-'~the :Soil sain~les3¥f6m--)~_e~n~-a-t~ii-:-~eb
pF0-d~¢t--~ii~el'ine an er'- ai r~fi~n~- which x current
Yee0mmended--gUidelines? Additional site characterization was required by ~e City of
Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division in the vicinity of the
former gasoline dispenser and pipeline.
Due to the subsurface stratigraphy at the site, an initial soil characterization by an
.exploration trench was attempted on July 1, 1992 using a backhoe operated by
Franzen Hill Corporation. Excavating proceeded to a length and width of 15 feet
centered on the product pipeline, and to a depth of 12 feet below surface grade
(Figure 2).
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
IBakersfield, College
6 October 30, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals in during excavation to provide a
vertical profile of the gasoline hydrocarbons. Soil samples were also collected at a
depth of 12 feet from the south, west and north sidewalls as well as the center of the
excavation base. No sample was collected from the eastern sidewall' since a sample
had been collected there during the tank removal operations.
Six soil samples were sent to B.C. Laboratories, of Bakersfield, California, a state-
certified laboratory for chemical analysis. The soil samples were analyzed for total
purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPHg) with a minimum detection
limit of 5.0 mg/kg, and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) with a minimum detection limit of 0.5 mg/kg
using USEPA Test Method 5030/GCFID, and USEPA Test Method 5030/8020.
i.2.1 Geologic Conditions
Regional Geology: The site is located in the southern part of the Great Valley
geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south trending valley,
approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide.~ Surface and groundwater in the San
Joaquin Valley is derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada mountain range to
the east, and is transported by five major rivers, the southern most being the Kern
River. The subject site is located approximately 1/2 miles south of the Kern River.
The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated
Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the
present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly
lake bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments which
extend to crystalline basement at approximately 20,000 feet.
Site Geology: Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial
sediments of the Kern River Formation, which form a homocline dipping to the
southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of poorly indurated and dissected fan
deposits (CDMG, 1964). The subject property is located at the top of the Panorama
Bluffs at an elevation 400 feet above the south side of the Kern River.
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
Bakersfield, College
7 October 30, 1992
The depth to the regional unconfined aquifer is greater than 400 feet below surface
grade beneath the site with the direction of groundwater flow to the southwest (Kern
County Water Agency, Improvement District No. 4, 1991 Report on Water Conditions,
February, 1992). The nearest known occurrence of perched groundwater is five'
miles to the southwest at a depth of 20 feet in the abandoned Kern River channel to
the ancient Kern Lake Bed (Kern County Water Agency, 1991 Water Supply Report,
May 1992). No perched groundwater is known to exist beneath the subject site.
1.2.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface material encountered during drilling was alluvium to the total depth of
the trench. The alluvium was characterized by consOlidated, highly permeable, very
slightly moist, light brown, well graded gravelly sand (SW/GW) with numerous large
cobbles to boulders.
1.2.3 Laboratory Analytical Results
All six of the soil samples analyzed contained concentrations of total purgeable
petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPHg) in excess of 1,000 mg/kg. TPPHg was
detected in the trench at a concentration of 1,800 mg/kg at a depth of 5 feet, 3,200
mg/kg at 10 feet and 1,800 mg/kg at 12 feet as well as 1,700 mg/kg in the western
sidewall, 3,200 mg/kg in the southern sidewall and 1,900 mg/kg in the northern
sidewall.
The gasoline constituent volatile aromatic, benzene was detected in three of the six
soil samples. Benzene was not detected in the samples from the center of the trench
at 5 and 10 feet or the southern sidewall at 12 feet. Benzene was detected in the
western sidewall at 0.7 mg/kg, in the northern sidewall at 0.8 mg/kg, and in the
trench base at 0.6 mg/kg. The gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and total xylenes were detected in all six of the soil samples.
Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for gasoline, and the
gasoline constituent volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total
xylenes have been calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
Bakersfield, College
8 October 30, 1992
account for attenuation due to site-specific parameters including vertical separation
to groundwater, soil lithology, fractures in subsurfaces, annual average
preciPitation, and any direct conduits to groundwater. The recommended guidelines
are 1,000 mg/kg for TPPH as gasoline, 1.0 mg/kg for benzene and toluene, and 50
mg/kg for ethylbenzene and total xylenes.
Laboratory analytical .results for the six selected soil samples from the excavation
trench are summarized in Table 2 Summary of Analytical Results. Copies of the
analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are presented in Appendix B -
Laboratory Analytical Results.
TABLE-2
values in milli ~er kilogram~
G~e I benzene Xylenes
TH_i' 5', 1,800, . ND 36* 34 . 320*
T'H-1 10' · 3~200' ND 13' 29 360*
South Sidewall 12' 1,700' ND , 17' 18 300*
West Sidewall 12' 3~200' 0.7 .10' 16 360*
North Sidewall 12' 1~900. .... 0.8 79* 45 430*
Base 12' 1~800' 0.6 13' 15 280*
A L NA 1 000 1.0 1.0 50 50
MRL NA 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
ND: None Detect6d at or above minimum reporting level (MRL).
NA: Not Applicable.
*: exceeds current recommended guidelines.
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guidelines for concentrations in soil.
Recommended guidelines were calculated rising the LUFT methodology ~by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to account for
attenuation due to soil composition and distance from groundwater.
1.2.4 Conclusions of the Initial .Ass. essment
The data obtained from the tank removal operations suggest that soil impacted with
gasoline hydrocarbons at concentrations in excess RWQCB recommended guidelines
exist at the subject site in an area beneath the former location of the gasoline
dispenser and product pipeline. The subsequent soil excavating activities indicate
that gasoline hydrocarbons in excess of 1,000 mg/kg extend to a depth greater than
12 feet below surface grade. Based on the field information and analytical data, it
appears that additional site characterization, and remedial activities will be required
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
Bakersfield, College
I
9 October 30, 1992
by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division.
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
!
I
I
The
additional site investigation should consist of soil borings to assess both' the vertical
and lateral extent of the .gasoline hydrocarbons in the subsurface.
2.0 BIOREMEDIATION DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING
The 50 cubic yards of gasoline impacted soil excavated from the site during the
exploration trenching was placed as a one foot thick lift within at treatment cell at
the site. The bioremedial system utilizes active mechanical cultivation by a tractor
and plow combination on a weekly basis. A significant decrease in the concentration
of the hydrocarbons through aeration, and oxygenation can be expected through the
mechanical cultivation of petroleum hydrocarbons with the molecular weight of
gasoline.
3.0 CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLING
The progress of the treatment has been monitored periodically by .field screening for
organic vapors using a PID. On September 23, 1992, ESE collected four composite soil
samples from locations within the treatment cell, each representing approximately
12.5 cubic yards of impacted soil.
Undisturbed soil samples were obtained by driving a modified Shelby Tube sampler
containing stainless steel sleeves with a weighted sliding hammer, immediately
sealed with a Teflon® liners capped, labeled, and placed on ice for transport to a
California Department of Health Services (DOHS) certified laboratory. Strict chain of
custody procedures were' utilized for all samples collected to ensure sample integrity
and to document sample possession from the time of collection to the final
destination.
4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF TREATED SOIL
The four soil samples were analyzed at BC Laboratories, a State of California certified
laboratory for TPPH as gasoline by USEPA Test Method 8015 (modified for gasoline),
and the volatile aromatics (BTEX) by USEPA Test Method 8020. The analytical reports
are included as Appendix A.
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
.I
i
I
Ir
I
I
I
Bakersfield~ College
1 0 October 30, 1992
5.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS - TREATED SOIL
TPPH as gasoline and the gasoline constituent volatile aromatics were not detected in
the fou~ soil samples. Table 3 presents a summary of the analytical results for TPPH'
as gasoline and the volatile aromatics (BTEX) in soil samples analyzed from the
bioremedial treatment cell:
TABLE 3.
(Analytical Results expressed in milligrams per kilogram)
, Gasoline . .. benzene Xylenes
$-1 "' ND ND' ND ND ND
$-3 ND ND ND ND ND
$-4 ND ND ND ND ND
..... oos ' o 0o5 ' o oos 'o o~
m~t~ ~ 0..: . .
ND: None Detected at or above minimum reporting level (MRL).
NA: Not Applicable
A L: Regional Water Quality Control Board recommended guideline for contaminants in soil. The
recommended guideline was calculated using the LUFT methodology by multiplying the most
stringent current federal or state water quality standards by a factor of 1,000 to account for
attenuation due to soil composition and distance from groundwater.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Soil with concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of RWQCB
recommended guidelines are known to exist in the subsurface at the location of the
former gasoline dispenser and associated product pipeline. Additional soil
characterizations are likely to be required by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department,
Hazardous Materials Division.
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bakersfield, College
1 1 October 30, 1992
The bioremediation of the excavated soil through mechanical cultivation enhancing
Oxygenation has successfully reduced the concentration of gasoline hydrocarbons in
the soil. Gasoline hydrocarbons are no longer detectable in the soil within the
treatment cell. The treatment 'cell will be decommissioned, and the soil spread on site
as grading fill.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
ESE recommends that additional soil characterization activities be conducted in the
location of the former gasoline dispenser and product pipeline. ESE recommends that
an attempt be made to conduct the soil characterization using a conventional hollow
stem auger rig. With luck a boring will be able to be advanced which determines the
vertical extent of the gasoline hydrocarbons in the subsurface, which is the most
important aspect of the characterization. If this can be accomplished, an argument
may be made that no additional action, or limited additional excavation and on site
treatment will be required for the site to receive closure, due to the several hundred
feet of vertical separation to the first known occurrence of groundwater.
8.0 CLOSURE
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Bakersfield College as it
pertains to the location of the former 3,000 gallon gasoline tank at 1801 Panorama
Drive 'in Bakersfield, California. The results contained in each verbal or written
report are based upon the information acquired' during the assessment. It is possible
that variations e0uld exist beyond points explored during the course of the
investigation. Also, changes in conditions found could occur at some time in the
future due to contaminant migration, variations in rainfall, temperature, and/or
other factors not apparent at the time of the field investigation.
This report should not be regarded as a guarantee that no further contamination,
beyond that which may have been detected within the scope of this study, is present
on or beneath the site. If additional information regarding the possible presence or
past use of hazardous materials at the site becomes available, then the need for
further field investigation should be re-evaluated. Similarly, if suspected
contamination is encountered during earthwork or construction activities, a
EB-8191-1
9210-E085.RPT
I
I Bakersfield, College 12 October 30, 1992
, O
qualified engineer or geologist should be on-site to monitor the soils and collect
I samples for laboratory analysis.
I The services performed by ESE were conducted in a manner consistent with the level'
of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently
Ipracticing under similar conditions in the state of California. No other warranty is
expressed or implied.
I Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding
this report or the information contained herein, please contact this office at your
I convenience. .
I Respectfully Submitted,
I EARTH SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
~im Martin -'~" mhrk-R, m~gargee, .t~.G. d~892
I Environmental Specialist Senior Geologist
I
I
cc: 1 - Addressee
2 - Tom Lockwood - Franzen Hill ~
I 1 Bakersfield File --
1 - San Luis Obispo File
I
I EB-8191 - 1 9210-E085.RPT
.... . ~~ ,, _,~/ ~ - , ,-,.,,.,,..,,~.
ANOR M
' p~.- ~ ~: · '~'.;'..~ P~~~ ~ I~ c.~
~ ~ ~,"~ 9~-~'~'- = ~ - ~ - ,.- = = ....:.: ....
~' flou~e Z ~ Ave[ el
. . ~ C,~o/,I? . ~ ~ C, aw,ordS,'/
" l ..... ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~,llkl ~u,~lSI I
~tl c ~~ ~ -.~ .t-,~ - '
Each Systems TITLE .Figure
A Mem~ ~ ~e EaCh Syste~ Gro~
BakersfieM, CA ~313
(8~) ~6-~t JO8 NO.
t~LJTOI~OTJ~£ ~
I
: I
Eadh Systems TITLE Figure
E qvironmental, Inc. ~~~~~~~ ~
(~) e36-~ .... JOB NO.
Bakersfield, College'
13
October 30, 1992
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EB-8191-1
APPENDIX A
Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody
9210-E085.RPT
I
I
I
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
6701 MCDIVITT AVE., STE. B
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE
Date of
Report: 09/30/92
LabS: 8627-1
Sample Description: EB-8191-2:S-1 & S-lA (SOIL) 09-23-92 @ i:15PM & 1:17PM COLLECTED
BY TIM MARTIN
TEST METHOD:
TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020..
I
I
I
Sample Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
09/23/92
Constituents
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
o9'/2~/92
Analysis
Results
Date Analysis
Completed:
09/28/92
Reporting
Units
Minimum
Reporting
Level
I
I'
I
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total'Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas)
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
'~:~-.T,O · 005
o'.oos
0.005
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186
410OA~as Or. - Bakersfield, CA ~B..-~5)(2~ · [~](DS) ~11 · F=AX (15lOb--) ~)27-1918
I
I
I
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL,
6701 MCDIVITT AVE., STE. B
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn.: IwJ%RK~GEE
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
INC.
Date of
Report: 09/30/92
Lab#: 8627-2
Sample Description: EB-8191-2:S-2 & S-2A (SOIL) 09-23-92 ® l:20PM & l:23PM COLLECTED
BY TIM MARTIN
TEST METHOD:
TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
Sample Matrix: Soil
I
I
Date Sample
Collected:
09/23/92
Constituents
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
.09/24/92
Analysis
Results
Date Analysis
Completed:
09/28/92
Reporting
Units
Minimum
Reporting
Level
I
I
I
I
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas)
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
~0..-005
'<:.0 · 005
o.o05
0.005
1.
I
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186
Department SupervisOr
4100 Atlas Ct. · Bakersfield, CA ~ - [BOb-) 327~-ql I · FAX [805) 3L::~7-1E)I 8
I
i
I
I
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 MCDIVITT AVE., STE. B Report: 09/30/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 8627-3
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE
Sample Description: EB-8191-2:S-3 & S-3A (SOIL) 09-23-92 ~ l:27PM & I:30PM COLLECTED
BY TIM MARTIN
TEST METHOD:
TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
I
'1
samPle Matrix: Soil
Date Sample
Collected:
09/23/92
Constituents
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas)
Date Sample
Received $ Lab:
09/24/92
Analysis
Results
None DeteCted
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
Date.Analysis
Completed:.
09/28/92
Reporting
. Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Minimum
Reporting
Level
~,~'~i~.0.005
'~0.'005
0.005
0.005
I
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department Supervisor
4100Ar3as Oc. · Bakems~eld, C~ ~2~2)(2~ · (8(2b----) 327~491 I · F~< []5)05) 327-1
I
I
I
I
PetroleUm Hydrocarbons
EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Date of
6701 MCDIVITT AVE., STE. B .. Report: .09/30/92
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313 Lab ~: 8627-4
Attn.: MARK MAGARGEE
Sample Description: EB-8191-2:S-4 & S-4A (SOIL) 09-23-92 ~ l:35PM & l:39PM COLLECTED
BY TIM MARTIN
TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015
Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020.
I
I
I
I
I
'1
Sample Matrix: .Soil
Date Sample
Collected:.
09/23/92
Constituents
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (gas)
Date Sample
Received @ Lab:
09/24/92-
Date Analysis
Completed:
09/28/92
Minimum
Analysis Reporting Reporting
Results Units Level
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
· ~. ~'0.005
":!:' O. 005
0.005
0.005
'1
!
I
I
California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186
Department .SuperviSor
4~ OOA~as Oc. · Baker~fSeld, CA ~)3:2)(i~ · 05~5) ~1 I ·
Report To: ~ ~ ~ ~, Analysis Requested
La~ Sample Description Date & Time Sampled
Comment: Billing Info: Re~h~~ ~o~eceivd .... ~bY: (Signature)~ ~/~'~/~E Date:~Time:
Name: ~.~. ~ ~linquishe~y:~Sign~ture) ~eceiv~by:(Signat~5 Date:Time?
Cit~ [~ State C ~ ..... Relinquished by: (Signature) Receiv~ by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Aaention: Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (Signature) Date: Time:
Time:
Miles: Relinquished by: (Signature) Receiv~ by: (Signature) Date: Time:
S~plo ~is~oal P.O.~ ~olinquish,d by: (Si~naturo) ~oeoivod b~: {Signature) Dato: Tim~:
~ ~rn to dionI ..