Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UST-REP 5/12/1989
Employee # Employee Signature Si{e~.~ecific T~me accounu~ng ~neeu Site Specific Status Changes: Site Name or bMMress Funding (Local, State, of Federal) ~ · Hours Date . ~eegory 'Activity '(lOths) Code Description ~t~ ~ ~o ~J,~,4 % ~',,d,~. ?,~..,..~ ~,/ ~,o I Notes: ~,;~C,""~ ' / Data Entered By: 'qz~ate: Permit # ~ 10004: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Site Specific Status Changes: ~ Hours Dat~ C_t~_e Description . ~ ~ter~ By: Date: Env. ~ealth 580 4113 1~ (Rev. 5189) OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet ~ermit 9 ~ / 0~4 Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ~ .... Employee Signature ~ ~ Funding (~,~ State, of Federal) Notes: ' FOR, Cat. egory Activity uo=e Code Description PHONE. CAL . (zoths) AREA CODE NUMBER ~S~.%' .. _ EXTENSION - TOPS FORM 4003 Date: :N6~':'"" ' :ing Sheet'. ' ~pecific Status Changes: Site Specific Time Ac¢ountihg Sheet Site Specific Status Changes: Cat. egory Activity Hours Date uo~e : Code Description ? ; !, ./ ~ (10ths) I CONTRACT oPTIONS FOR T,RA.T,Q:~:~ ~ Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet' Site Specific Status Changes: ~~' ~ ~ Hours Date "~.~0~ L~x~e~¢~-~':, Description : ,~ (lOths)~,.~ ~ Enter~ 2 By: · Date: =~,, ~=,*~ ~n &~3 1~ (Rev. 5/89) Date. . · OONTRACT OPTIONS FOR IZAKI~ TANKS ' Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet .- I Site Specific Status Changes: Fundinc State, ' of Federal N(~tes :. ' ' " Data Entered By: Date: ~v ~.~l~h 580 4113 137 (Rev, 5/89) EmplOyee Employee Signature co~n~ om~o~s ~oR ~~ ~ 'Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Site Name/o~Address ~; ~ ~~ (~oo~, State, o~ ~er~l) Site Specific Status Changes: IDa,te I Cat. egory IActivity u~e Icoat I I, l ,~o~.: P.,~,-...,,~ ,,- · ,_..,i/ Hours (10tns) Description >' ' I,l I Data Entered By:. Date: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR T,FAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet ,Permit # ~/:(~Oq6 :' Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ~ ~ ~ r~.: ~,~):..State~, of Federal) · :~":~:;:~::':' 'l: Category, IActivity IDescriptiOn '~l~J~:'' ~'""::" I' ~:I, :..,-n~-/',~ ~.~'-b~ .I'~.,t' ~.~, ~ - Hours ' · (lOths).. Data Entered By: Date: Env. Health 580 411310 (Rqv. 5/89) ~ OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet ,1%='~'t # gtOOOa ISite Name or Address Site Specific Status Changes: v Date ~eegOry Activity Hours '\ Code Description ( 10ths ) ~ "~,o ~." ,off " ' ' CO~ OPTIONS FOR T,W. AKING TANKS Site Specific Time A~counting Sheet Permit # ~.tO00 C/.. Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ~ Funding' (~cal~. State, of Federal Hours (lgtns) · Data Entered By: Date: Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89) Employee ~~ OPTIONS FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Employee Signature ~ (~, ~: ~ · ;ite Name or Address ~/L/., ~ ~.'~?-, ~ ~..~- Funding /~oca~,. State, of Federal) ~ Site Specific Status Changes: xctivity Date Code Description (lOths) N6tes: ~ ~ter~ ~: ' ~te: CONTRACT OPTIONS 'FOR LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time A~counting Sheet Permit # ~ t 0 ¢ ¢ ~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # 9 ' ' Env. Health 580 4113 ~"7 (Rev. 5/89) Employee # 'i:"}':}' :':J: ~,r~, 2toood. CONTRACT Site Specific Time Date. Site Specific Status "' Employee Employee Signature CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEA~ T_AN'K.q ' Site Specific Time Accoun~g S~{~t Site Specific Status Changes: 'Site Name or Address · '~ ~ of Federal) Description Hours (10tbs) Data Entered By: Date: Permit % OlO004L Site Specific StatusChanges: CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR>~ ~. NG TANKS Site Specific Time A,~an..' ting Sheet Permit # .jlO00~ Site Specific StatUs Changes: Employee # ~ Employee Signature Site Name or Address Funding %~0c~, State, of F,ederal) ,Date uoae Cod DesCription Notes: .:.*,p.~;. ~ . ~. ' ~ /' ' ' Data Entered By: Date: -, ',. ~CONTRACT OPTIQNS FOR ~~ ~t . ': Site ~cific Time Acco~t~ ~nee Site '~cific S~tus ~ges: Env. Health 580 4113 137 ,{ . Date . Code ..: coAe ue~o~p~ · ' Da~ ~ter~ By: ~te: Employee '~'~me ACCOUnting Sheet~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee Signature Site Name or Address e, of F~e~l) o~ ~e ~scription Notes: ~ ( lOths ) Date: .... ~.; .~'~.. :~-.. '"-:~;'~ ~%%CT OPTION_S, FOR ...... ~ sheet , ~.- ~ ' ~" "~' ' site ~cific S~ :ite ~e~ ~ss::~?' -...~:.~..,:.: ,. ~ ...::.~.-.~:_.Z:~.;? . 4:. - s~te, of F~e~l) ":"~: '- '~ :'~' ; . . '. . '~ . ,._ ;. - · - . ~o~ ,. ~scription' ' "~ ~ '~'. ~ ' Entered By: Date: ~nv. Hea~t~ 580. 137 (Rev. 5~89) Per~_it ~ CONT cs o nONs Site Specific Time Acco~ti~ Sheet Site ~cific S~s ~ges: Employee Employee Signature :~. gory Activity : .....< :>: .... .. Code Description "- Not~s: Data Entered By: ..... : .:- .. ..... Date:' · i~...i. 7v i...' ' ....'. . ~ ' ' - ~:~" '.'- · . . · .:.~.~ U:~:.~,,',..· .,., · ~ ., -~ ......... Site ~cific T~e Acco~ti~ Sheet Hours ( lOths ) Site Specific Status Changes: ,: ." ':~' :1 ." .Category IActivity Date I~ Code :q:'. Code'. Notes: A~.'. i,~ * - Hours ' 0, Data Entered By: Date Permit. ~~ OPTIONS FOR 'LEAKING TANKS Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # ~ployee .Signature Site ~e~or Address Funding .~Loc~, -' State, of Federal Aotivi , Ho=s Date~ Code Description (lOths) '~1¢t~ ~ Ir ,P,--e~/.~/' .f~i~Y ~ <~.-~ ~, I ~ ~t~ ~: ' ~te: Site Specific Time Accoun=~ng snee= Permit # ~]000~ ' Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # Site '~e amsSi ._ . S~te, of F~i) .:.:' ' .' Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Permit # ~QiO(~'(~ Site Specific Status Changes: Employee # q Employee Signature DOl¢r'~ ' (-~,~ Site Name or Address ~h,'b~ C~-~ e ~' Funding ~9 State, of Federal) Date ~eegOry Activity Hours Code Description ( ! 0tbs ) Notes: ~ ~ter~ ~: ~te: Employee Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89) CONTRACT OPTIONS FOR LEA~NG~ Site Specific Time Accounting Sheet Site specific status Changes: Description '" Hours-: . ' · ( i. otns). '.~" I,.¢ Data Entered By: Date: Env. Health 580 4113 137 (Rev. 5/89) ~ue bpecizic Time Account~ Sh~t Permit %. · ~/0 0 0 ~ ' Employee #~" -~ G ---------Empl°yee' Signature. ~~ Site Name or Address..:' ,-:" · . Furding (Local, State, of' Federal Notes: Site Specific Status Changes: Hours ' (~O~h~) Data Entered By: ..... . '. Date: Site Specific Status Changes: Hours '0.5' Data Entered By: · Date: ~ermit ~___°q_L?__O__O_~____ Employee Name Site Name or AddreSs L. JkJloh.) !mployee Signature Funding (Local, State, oh F~enal) ~ 'C.O..L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING ~HEET c~9 u ¢~ H Cat. Activity J HoursI Date Code Code. JDescription of Activity j(.lO's) '/'J .... ..... J Notes 9ata Entered By Date .... C.O.L.T. SITE SPECIFIC TIME ACCOUNTING SHEET, Notre ::: Cat,'.~;;!t;,~: JActivity:,,:.: J ': ..... ~: · ICoder?~,~;.t: JCode ,.'? Description of Activity'~ ..... ?' :::''i-,.. f . 15-o - 2o ~ f ~/// Entered 8Y'"L__L,_L .................. Date Env. Health 580 4113 February 28, 1990 .. A TG Company MS. Dolores GOugh ~ .... Kern County Department of. ' Environmental Health Services ... ' . ..,. Bakersfield, CA 93301 · - ............ '~ ~'.' . ', .-~.... ..... :.:--:-~ ~,:::~:~,~:~:~:' :'Subject: ....'Union Cemete~. '"-' ';~" :"::' :'"~'":::'~'~::?'~:?:': :':?:~'~:?~:;:;~~ ~is letter is to co~ our conversation of'today d~g w~ch we ~sed mee~g '"?~'-~ to talk about U~on Cemete~. ~e proposed mee~g dine w~ 10 ~.~ I h~ve attached ~opi~s of ~~ d~t~ co~e~ed d~g. field October ~-29, 1989. Plebe note ~t dete~ed ~H concen~o~ h~ve ~opped .. comp~ed to pre~ous ~yses. I am looking forward to discussing the project with you. If you have any questions please contact me at 326-0492. Sincerely, Thorne Environmental Barbara Minette 'Project Hydrogeologist BM/cs 2/9O 3E-1032.007 4570 California Avenue Suite 200 · Bakersfield, California 93309 · (805) 326-0492 "Treatment by Design" s I ~ERN $ 3'1 i ~ ? '.4 LAKE ..... GREENFIELD ??E. I ~2 I mad. UNION CEMETERY BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA LOCATION MAP 3E.10~2 -N' POTOMAC STREET X. X GRAVES GRASS 1 1st Approximate former location of underground storage tank ASPHALT LANE. VE-2 B'3o '~2nd 0 10' APPROXIMATE SCALE 1",-10' 'UNION CEMETERY BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SITE MAP CHAIN-LINK FENCE cARPORT TO OFFICE LEGEND / (~ THORNE V,,~6C)~I-I~q"RACTION WELL · THORNE SOIL BORING O S.E.I. SOIL BORING · B.C. LAB SOIL BORING /0/~f., 13 LEVINE-FRICKE SOIL BORING 3E-1032I 2 Sample #/ Boring/ Depth 02135 VE,1,.30' 02139 VE-1, 50' 02144 VE-1, 75' 02148 VE-1, 95' 02152 VE-2, 20' 02155 VE-2, 35' 02158 VE-2, 50' 02163 T-i, 25' 02166 T-i, 40' 02168 'T-l, 50' ANALYTICAL RESULTS TPH as .. gasoline Benzene Toluene Xylene (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (Ppm) 830 1,200 11 4 280 46 140 420 230 1.4 1.3 ND ND 0.320 ND ND 0.031 ND 0.81 89 120 ND' 0.0024 11 0.003 0.056 3 29 .. 51 290 180 0. 012 0.0026 52 0.0027 0.093 90 74 .¸ 68 Ethylbenzene Lead (ppm) -(ppm) 36 24 0.0014 ND 8.6 ND 0.027 9.3 27 46' 6.8 6.9 UNION CEME'I:ERY BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA ANALYTICAL RESULTS PROJECT NO. 3E-1032 ,,Nat. ional lox cology .. Laboratories AFFILIATED WITH ZAI(~O I.ASORATORIE$, lNG.- 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sheath, B.S. ~'~let Toxtcolo~t~ Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D. Laborato~ Director 805/322-4250 SAMPL= iD: ~ho, ne Environ Samples (see beio~) I NTL _Am ~: 9!030C TEST: Total Volatile .Pe~r'oieum Hydroc~cbon~ METHQO: CaliYorn~a OQHS LUFT Manual S~PL[ TYPE' Soils ~' 9iOSOC-iO ~'iSO 1200 ugy'~-:~ a~ Gaso!~n.~ 9L030C-29 2LE.~ =6 ug/'g,'n a'~ '91030C-37 _=:o ..~= u,:,/.:~ a,s Gasoline . ~_~= ==C ug/gm as Gasoline ============================================================= Kucc R. !'4e±sess, Ch..O., Direccor Environmen=a! Analysis ' 1 lox colog.y" L'aborat'ories 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107. AFFILIATED WITH ZALC.O LA~DRATORIES, INC. Bakers'field, California 93301 805/322-4250 Samole ID: · Dace Receivec: Oate Analyzed: Oaue Coi!ec,~ea: Sample QeScriD: LABORATORY 9!030C'6 27-0c~-89 * Oi-Nov-S9 08-Nov=g9 25-0c5-89 2!Z5 Kuct R' Neisess Ph.D. Cons Ci tuen c Benzene: Toluene: E~ny!benzene: X¥!enes: Succogate Recovery: Test Test TyDe of Basis: Surrogase: Cilu~icn Analysis Reoor:ing units ug/Xg ug/Kg u'g/Kg Extracted: n/a Requescec: 8020 Me:not: EPA. Method 8020 Samo!e- Soil ,~= Recelveo DS Toluene 8 TX L C' 00 ~nal,/sis 1400.0 89000.0 ~00~ 0 290000.O 90.0 ,,_~._ r Level !000.00 !OOO.O0 I000.00 Cc~,mmentm: California O.O.H.S. Cars. ~225 i°nal xlcology. Laboratories AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sheath. B.S. Naresh C. Jain. Ph.D. Lmboram~ Dire:mr · 805/322-4250 LABORATORY REPORT Sample ID: 9!050C-!0 Date Received: 27-0ot-89 Oa~e Analyzed: O!-Nov-89 Test Test 6xtractea: n/a. 8020 BTX Method ~020 Oa:e ReDorted OS-Nov-~9 Oace Coilecteo:' 25'0c:=89 Type of S,amoie: Soil Basis: ~ Reca~vad SamDie Oescrip: ~ 'Surrogate: 08 Toluene - 0 ~ i u ,.'.ion L 000 Kurt R. Nei=_~s~=o , P!a.D. Oi rector Envi ron,'nen: al ,.3ohs ti ~uent A~,a!ys i's ~ Re~,o r ~ir, g r. Jni ts .... aha !yei'--. Resu ! ts ~inimum Level ~ Benzene.: ug/Kg 'Toluene: ug/Kg Ethy!~en ..... u ,,: ,, .. Toca! Xylenes: ug/' Kg Surrogace Recovery: lZO0.O 120000.0 24000.0 130000.0 !00.0 !000.00 lO0.O.O0 !000.00 iO00.O0 C,2mme n 'ts: California O.O.H.S. Cert. ~'~'~5,,=--. Noat. iona 1 xtcology" . Laboratories AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, CalifOrnia 93301 Thomas C. Sneath, B.$. C~iet Tox~.o[o~st Nare~h C. Jain, Ph.D. L~bomm~/D~:~r 805/322-4250 LABORATORY REPORT Sample ID: 9iOJ0C-i5 Oats Extracted: n/a 'Da:e Received: 27-0ct-S9 Test RequesBed: 8020 BTX Oats Analyzed: O!-Nov-~9 Test MeBnod:. EPA Me:hod 8020 Date Reported OS-Nov-89 Type of Samm!e: Soil ,Dace Coi!ectea: ~ Oct Basis: As Receivec Sample Oescrip: 2144 Surroga:e: DS Toluene :3i!ucicn ¢actor' / Kur% R. Neisess, Ph.D. Ana!ysis~// ~eDcrsiag ~alysi.z ._-:vel ~enzene: TaZuene: E~y~benz~ne: Total Xylenes: S~crogaEe Recover-y~ ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg u gl" Xc Nome OeE~CSed !2.0 il6.0 i. O0 i .00 ! .00 i . :>'3 California O.O.H.S. Cert. . Noa ional x;c°logY Laboratories 3101 - 16~h Street, Suite 107 A~,U^TEO W,TH Z~LCO U^aOR^TORmS. Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sneak. B.S. Nare~h C. Jain. Ph.D. [.ab(~a~o~ Oir~cxor 805/322-4250 Samo!e iD: Da5e ReceiQed: Oace Analyzed: Date Reported Oate ColiecseO: Sample Oescrip: LA~ORAT~RY ~10SOC-£9 27-0ct-89 Ol-MCv-~9 OS-Nov-Sg 25-Oc%-S9 REPORT Oate Test Test Type of -Basis: E;,<trac:ed: n/a RequesCed: 8020 BTX Method: EPA ~e:ho~ 8020 Sample: Soil '~s Received Surrogate: DS Toluene Oilu r. ion ¢accor: atnyiDenzene: ug/Kg Su rroga~e Recovery: ' s$ ~inimum ~nalysis ~.ecar~Lng Nome Oececr, ec 1.00 £..,, i . OD None Oe.'cec .'-em l.'OO 2 . 6 i . O0 Comment%: California O.O.H.S. Cers. x.'225 . Noatjonal xlcology" Laboratories AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 ~ 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California 93301 Thoma- C. Sheath, R.S. I~ie~ Tox]c~log~ · Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D. Labor~m,~ Dir~mr 805/322-4250 Samo!e I0: 9!030C-25 REPC'RT Date Date ReceiveC: £7-0ct-57 Test RequesseC: 802'0 8TX Oate. ~na!yzed: Ol-Nov-89 Test Mechoa: EP~:,-'~=tmod 3020 Date Reported· 08-Nov-S~ Oa~e Collecte~: 25-0c~-89 Tyoe of Sample: Soil Basis: As geceivec Sample Descrip: .... Surrogate: DS Toluene 20 '..) 320.0 8~_00. O, 52000.0 92.0 200.00 '£ ,: ':., '.':. 0 Z C C: . ,'.-'.' 0 £'30: O0 Comments: ,i:,alifornia ,% O ~ = ,Cert. i°nal x: col aboratories t c: AFFILIATED WtTH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 · Bakersfield, California 93301 Thoma, C. Sheath. B.S. Chili Tomcoloqm Nareah C. Jain, Ph.D. Labor~ory Director 805/322-4250 " LABORATORY REPORT S.amo!e ID:' 91050C-26 Date Extracted: n./,a Date Received: Oate ~nalyzed: 27-0ct-89 O1-NOv-89 Test Requested: 8020 BTX Test Method: EPA Method 8020 Oate ~emorCed Date Collected: 08-Nov-89 25-0ct-89 Type of samoie: Soil 8asis: As Received ~ Sample Oescrio: 2!g5 Surrogate: 08 Toluene Oilu5ion Facsor: Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D. Oi rec".or Environmental '2o~s ~ i 5ue:~ 5, Ana!ysis~ unica. Analysis minimum Reoortinc- Benzene: ug/Kg None Detect__ !.00 ~ .... _ ~ . i .C'O : ,~_t ..... : ug/'KC ~ 0 Ethyi~er, zene' ,ag/Kg None Oetec:ec L.C,C, To,al Xy!ene~- ' ,ag/'Kg 2.7 i .C,O Surroqasa RecoveCy: es ,l:ai~ornia O 0 H S Cart oat. ional xlcolog " Laborat Dries AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107. Bakersfield, Californi~ 93301 Thomae C. Sheath, Chi,,t ~ Naresh C. Jain. Ph.D. L. abomto~ Director 805/322-4250' ,Sam.m le ID: Date Received: Oate Analyzed: Oa~a geoorted Oace Collected: LABORATORY 91030C-29 27-0ct-89 O!-Nov-89 08-Nov-89 25-0ct-89 REPORT Date Extracted: 'Test Requested: S020 Test Method: EPA Method 8020 ,y~e of Samo!e: Basis: As Rece&ved 8TX Sample Descrip: 2158 Surrogate: D8 Toluene Dilution Factor: Kur~. R. Neisess, Ph.D. Oirector Environmental Cues Ana!ysis ~,/ ' . Analysis Benzene: Ug'/Kg.' None Oecec:ed Toluene: ug/:<g _=5 .,.) E:nylber, zene: ug/'Kg 27.0 Total ;;<¥lenes: ug/F,g 93.0 Su rrogase Recovery: % M i n i ,m,J m ,i. O0 L . i. C:O L . O0 Commends: ,'California O.O.H.S. Cert. ~225 ox cology .- Labo rat o ri es' AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3'101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sneath, Chi~t Toxicoto~st Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D. [Jborato~ Oit~tor 805/322-~250 ~am~le ID: L~BOR~TORY REPORT Date Extracted: n/a Date Received: 27-0c5-89 Date Analyzed: Ol-Nov-89 Date Reported 08-Nov-Sg, Tes~ Requested: Teat Method: EPA Type of Sample: 8020 Soil Date Collected: 25-0ct-89 Sample Oesc'riD: 2163 Surrogate: DS aecefveC Toluene Kur5 R. Neisess, Ph.D. Oirector fnvironmenca! An~'_ysis Reoorting · M i :n i :n u m .aRCO :-ti ng :_ e'.,,'e 2 Benzene: ug/Kg Toluene: ug/Kg tny!oenzene: ug/Kg Xylenes: ug/'Kg Su rroga=.e Recovery" 3! .0 3000.0 93©0.9 ~-~O,.}O0.0 2] . 0,9, Commen us: California O,O.H.S. Cert. ~=5 xlcology. .. Laboratories AFFILIATED'wITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sheath, B.S. Chili To~colog~t Nareeh C. Jain, Ph.D. Laborato~ Ditto:tot . 805/322-425O 'LABORATORY RERQR. T Sa,mole iD: 910S0C-37 n/a *' Daze Receivec: 27-0ct-87 Oat.~' Analyzed: 'O!-Nov-~9 DaTa Reoorted Type of Sample: 8020 BTX soil ~aze Co!iecaeO: 25-0CC-89 Sample Oescrip: 216~ Surrogate: D8 Toluene coo Kur'= R. Neisesz, Ph.D. 'DJ recr~cr fnvi ronmen ~a! mi nimum · p, eOO r- 4 ~,? '2~000. 27000. - '~,30 C:. 99. 200.00 2C':} ,Zaiifcrnia O'O.H.'E. Cert. ~ ional x colo y" Labora! ories 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, Cai[fornl'a 9'3301 Thoma. C. Sheath, B.$. Oli,I Toxtcolo<~lt Nare.h C. Jain, Ph.D. r -borBto~ Director 805/322-4250 Sample iD: Dace Received: Oate Analyzed: LABORATORY REPORT 9L030C-39 Oate 27-0ct-'S9 Test Oi-Nov-~9 Test E)<t nec tec: Re~uesCed: 8020 8TX Method: EPA Method ~3020 Dace Re,or,.ed 08-,Nov-S9 Type of Sample: Soil Oa'~e -Cci lecteO: 25-0ct-89 Basis As Recei,/ec '~ ....... ' Sample OescriD: 216E Surrogate: D8 Toluene Oilution Fact:or: Kur: P. Neisess, Ph.D. C, irecr, cr Eqvironmen~a:_ Analysis Ccn.s'si ;,,~n~ Uni ~z .~.esu i cE ueve i 2 C, 0.00 -: 0 '3. ' :: :?' 200. ,2.'0 £ 00.00 ,:Ca!~'fornia 0 c i4 S C. er5 ' ' ~ ENV, IRONMENTAL L.P. NO. SAMPLERS: (Signature/Numbei') · .x SAMPkE I.D. TAINERS REMARKS MM/DD/YY HH:MM:SS -. Relinquished by: ISigna,u,.I Dale~lme Received by: I~t~na,u,.) Remarks ' Send Results To Relinquished by: (Si~nalure) Date/Time Recolved by: (Signalu~e) ~.~D (). / .' Relinquished by: ISig~mre) Dale~lme ReCeived Io¢ Labo¢~lory by: ~"~,,~ - ~2 ~.-, ~ ~-'2 White · Sampler Canary · Relurn Copy TO Shipper Pink . Lab Copy -- ENVIRO L.P. NO. SAMPLERS: (Signature/Number) ,_/ ~ " ", '? '"'~': ~?~ '"':" ~':'~'~/~: CoN. ~/ ~.'/"' ~/~ ~/~'~ ~ .~.../,'"I', . '~ i,.'; ;~:,.... ~]~a~-, vE-~ ~ ~- ~ v- ~. I~' '*g5 ~:'-~ ! 51 /~' I' ~' I~ -)~ ' /i ~ .~ ~ "I 5' -~ .')~ ~ ' V -.'" ~ ,/~/ ~-~ / / ,,: ..-: ~, ~ ~ _:,s I ~':' /-~..~ ~ /..~, /~/~ ," a/3'2 ~..~' 'I v' ~"' ~ ~' .' ~"~ e"~,~ '~:': I. ~ ~ " '" Relinquished by: (Signalure) Dale/Time Received by: (Signalure) Remarks Send Results To : ..... 2.'~:' ..... :~/, /~l'~/~''' ~"~'~2:: " ' ' Relinquished by: Isig.,~.~,l / "~ale~ime R.cei~ed by: (sig,~at.~.) /~c, .. ..... I ~u .... ,... ~ .... ~/ THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Relinquished by: (Signalure) Date~lme Received for Laboratory by: Wl~ile · Sampler Pink - Lab Copy Canary . Ralurn Copy To Shipper ENVIRONM, .ENTAL~' (Signature/Number) MM/DD/YY HH:MM:SS Relinquished by: (Signalu*e) Date/Time Received by: (Signa,u~e) Remarks Send Results To ~.~ ~,.~ r R;linquished by: (Signalu,e) I I Da&~ime Received by: ISig,,alme} Relinquished by: ISignalure) Date~ime Received lot Laboralory by: I (Signature) W[~ile - Sample~' Canary · Return Copy To Sl~ppef Pink · Lab Copy h!o' n 1 R I o--.~ ,~,T 0~' O~Temn~v , PROPOSED MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR GASOLINE-AFFECTED SOILS AT UNiON~CEMETERY, · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 9 June 1987 LF 1675 Prepared for: Wegener Construction, inc. 4204 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 ~JUN1 Cd 1987 LEVINE-FRICKE LEVINE-FRICKE CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANO HYDROGEOLOGISTS LF 1675 6/09/87 PROPOSED MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR GASOLINE-AFFECTED SOILS x, AT UNION CEMETERY, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ~ ... · .. EVidence of gasoline leakage into surrounding soils was discov-.- ered when an underground gasoline .storage tank at' the Union Ceme- tery was excavated in 1986... ,": '.;~,;.~.,.~;,~,',?~ ......... -~.~:.,.'.,~;~ .:,~,. ,,~._-, .x-,...'.~.:~:: ... ,:,~?,. ..... ~.c~x . ; "~ . " - - - .... ' - subsequent subsurface ·investigations bY'B.C. Laboratories during September-October 1986 and by Soils Engineering, inc ~,(SEI) dur-. '~:~'~- ~' ..i.:!.:i~>'i:!i~i~i}!.-!.'}_ing January 1987 iindicated .that ·gasoline had a~fe6ted '~oil-~ ~from the base of the former gasoline tank to a~maximum depth of. approximately 40 feet. 'Soil boring locations arel illustrated in Figure 1. Laboratory analysis results for soil s,ampled from bor- ings advanced di. rectly under the former tank location and the immediate surrounding area indicated total volatile h~drocarbons (TVH) were present at concentrations ranging' from not detected. (ND) to 15,310 ppm. Chemical analysis results indicated 2,378 ppm TVH in a soil sample from a depth of 40 feet, I immediately beneath the former tank location. However, soil samples from a 45-foot depth in the same boring contained only 1572 ppm TVH, possibly indicating the basal edge of the hydrocarbon plume. Sediments encountered in the soil borings consist d of inter- bedded deposits of clayey sand, silty sand, sand, and occasiOnal laYers of clayey silt and sandy clay. Ground water was reportedly not encountered in any of the borings, which extended to a maximum depth of 45 feet. SEI reported thattdepth to ground water in the site vicinity was greater than 150 feet (according to Water Supply Report 1985, Kern county Water. Ag~lncy). Results of previous investigations suggest that unsaturated soils containing significant amounts of gasoline were confined to a relatively limited area (less than about eight feet laterally from the tank) surrounding the former tank location and extending to a maximum depth of approximately 45 feet directly b~neath the tank. (Figures 2 and 3). Gasoline compounds were not d~tected in two shallower borings only eight feet from the former tank location. These measurements are confirmed by the typ~e of sediments encountered since, due to the more permeable nature of th'e soils underlying the tank, leakage from the tank would ~ot be expected to spread laterally to a significant degree in th~ unsaturated zone. 1 Based on soil chemical analysis data collected pr viously by B.C. Laboratories and SEI, Inc., Levi·ne-Fricke, Inc. completed soil boring LF-1 (Figure 1) on May 11, 1987 approximately 15 feet east 629 OAKLAND AVENUE OAKLAND, CA 946'1'1-4567 -1- [4'~5] 652-4500 of'the fo~mer undergrond tank location, The boring Was extended to a depth of 70 feet based on-Photovac TIP photoionization meter readings suggesting the presence of organic chemicals to a maxi- mum depth of about 60 feet. (the TIP measures relative VOC con- centrations, in ppm, in the air as gases or vapors surrounding the soil). Soil vapors.were measured by placing a sample of the soil in a plastic.bag and then sealing the bag. The soil sample was then broken into smaller pieces and placed in the sun for a short time to allow organic chemicals, if present, to volatilize within the plastic bag. The TIP meter was'then activated and a background (: amb~.ent air reading was recqrded,..!...-The ~TIP meter was then inserted into the plastic bag a~d 'a measurement :from inside the' ~:~ bag was recorded..'-.~ i :''- '~", :',:~-,::rz ~:~::21'. ;:!-:' ~:':.:'?:';:/!~::',':::?~'?,'?-?:?~::~?i~' ;'-' .... ~ . A iithol°gi~ log for soil b0r~-~':'~'~-i 'is'PreSented in Fibre 2. ?.. :'?:::..,::?~'~Included are a descrlptzon of,~dzment ~.Izthologies enco~tered ~:::: :- . and relative VOC co~centrations~(in ppm)"measured using the TIP J .... in a~ient air and zn air i~ediately adjacent to Soil samples. Analytical results' for selected soil samples from ~-1 are pre- sented ih Append,ix A. These results indicate that no VOCs were present in concentrations above--their respective detection lim- its. 'H6wever, this should not be taken as conclusive evidence that VOCs were not present in the soil. at the time of sampling. It is possible that VOCs present may have rapidly vol.atilized after sample collection and prior to analysis, precluding detec- tion in subse~ent labqrato~ analysis. -2- LEV N .FRIcK PROPOSED MITIGATIVE STRATEGY: ~N SITU VAPOR EXTRACTION The proposed strategy for mitigating gasoline-affected soils is vapor extraction. Cased borings~will be installed in the affected area to'extract the solvent vapors, in situ. The soil gas extracted from the vadose (unsaturated) zone will carry'vola- tile organics with it, reducing their concentrations in the soil.. A schematic diagram of the proposed vapor extraction and ..~,.~ ..` ./ - treatment system is presented in.Figure 3. · ' ~ ' 60 feet at, or near,.the former gasoline tank location. Each ~'~,~ ~ boring will be completed by the hollow-stem'augerdrilling ".,?"?~.-~'¥'"~' ~'~' ~' .~method. Soil samples will be collected near continuously using a J ' "split-spoon or modified California sampler,'described, and then..~-~i~.i~. ~.,.i?.~%~i~!~recordea. ~'~VOC levels associated with soil ,from each 'sampling. ,~ · ?~-:~V~!?i~:~?'-interval W~ll be measured in the'rield with'the TIP.~'~Soil.'=%~'~~(~.~'i~-'~ .J '"' ':: ..'samples will be collected from selected intervals either by"~'~>~i¥!?~'J~?~ . ~ directly placing the soil in laboratory supplied containers, or by using clean,brass tubes inserted inside the modified California sampler. It is estimated that three vapor extraction wells completed in these borings will be sufficient for Capturing soil gas from the area containing gasoline-affected soils. Each boring will be completed by placing screened PVC casing throughout the entire length. The actual depth of screened PVC casing, which will be between 40 feet and 60 feet, Will be based on TIP measurements indicating'the maximum depth'of gasoline-affected soils encountered in each boring. Selected soil samples collected during drilling will be analyzed after completion of the wells to confirm the TIP readings. The need for additional borings will be evaluated 'based on monitoring of system performance after startup. A manifold will be installed to connect the casings to a positive displacement, blower. This will create-a vacuum in the casings, causing soll gas to flow from.the vicinity of the casings to the blower. Air from the blower will be piped to a vapor-phase treatment system consisting of carbon cannisters. The treatment system will remove organic compounds before discharging the air to the atmosphere. Vacuum gauges, sample points, and control valves will be provided on the upstream side of the blower to monitor influent vapor flow. The blower will have a rating of about'100 cubic feet per minute (cfm). Additional points will be sampled downstream of the blower to monitor for VOC breakthrough. When the lead carbon cannisters show'breakthrough, they will be recharged with fresh vapor phase carbon and moved to the polish position while the former polish units are moved to the lead position. In this way, '3- .- LEVJNE-FRICKE the fresh,st carbon will..always be in contact with the exiting air. Soil gas will be sampled and flow rates,measured after start-Up· to obtain data for calculating VOC removal rates from the area. Flow rates will be measured when samples are collected. Vacuum readings will also be taken at each extraction location to moni- tor changes in flow conditions. The extraction system will beoptimized to limit removal rates and air flow by adjusting the valves in the manifold system. The "~ 'estimated VOC loading to the'atmosphere will depend on .the rate 'of.Organic compound removal from the soil mass. The carbon adsorption system is.designed reduce the VOCs in .the emission · from the blower by at least 90 percent. 'Because °f the diffi- ~: .... '.~. ~Culty in predicting the rate of gasoline removal from the soil J. ~.'~- mass when a vacuum is apPlied'through cased borings, carbon'cann-~:~ .' ~',~-'~i~!sters.will be. installed in a series 'arrangement"for Start-u j-i~''~~'''''~', A rePort Will' be prepared"~ .... documenting 'all Construction activities ' ~ and assessment of chemical analysis, results to determine whether additional soil Sampling and/or soil-gas extraction are neces- i · sary. If further work is deemed unnecessary, the report will i document site closure. -4- i ST'REET X 'Fence -.~ · I st Hole B-3 e / C Approximate Former Tank Location / A I I: I I I I ROAD Building Asphalt 0 5 feet I Approx. Scale EXPLANATION · Soil boring location Map Source: SEI Union C~etery figure. Figure 1 : SOl/ BORING LOCATION MAP Project No. 1675 LEVINE'FRICKE CONSULTING I:NGINIKEIBS ANO HYOIIOGEOLOGISTS MAY87GT 25 30 Graphic ' Log ... )GY Description ASPHALT. SILTY SAND (SM), medium brown, moist to dry, loose. SAND (SP), light, tan, loose, poorly sorted, very fine- to coarse-grained sand, moist to dry. SAMPLE DATA SAHPLE SANPLE NUMBER INTERVAL ._ - . .. -. : ..... ::.: · .CLAYEY SANDY.SILT (ML), med{um brownl moist, -.' abundant amount of mica, loose ~':. Color change to medium gray-brown and petroleum odor evident at ~18.0. feet. SAND (SP) to SILTY SAND (SM), medium tan, loose, poorly'sorted, very fine- to medium- .' grained sand and silt, abundant amount of mica, petroleum odor. Color change to medium brown and strong petroleum odor at ~28.0 feet. Locally more of a gray-brown color, strong petroleum odor. PHOTOVAC READING (ppm) AMBIENT AIR/ S01L 5AMPLE -0.3/1.5 0.5/53.1 0.5/26.3 · 0.6/80.1 0.6/80.4 Figure 2 : LITHOLOGY AND SAMPLE DATA FOR SOIL BORING LFI' Project No. 1675 LEVINE'FRICKE CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANO HYDROGEOLOGISTS MAYg7GT 65! 70:: Graphic Log -' ~--LITHOLOGY Date drilled: 11 May 1987 Description Very fine- to medium-grained sand, moderate amount of mica. Becoming moderately sorted ~ 40-45 feet, flne- to medium-grained sand, decrease in amount of mica. SAMPLE DATA SANPLE SAMPLE NUNBER INTERVAL SANDY SILT (ML), medium brown, loose, moist. CLAYEY SILT (ML), medium'dark brown, no noticeable petroleum'odor. Becoming a clayey sandy silt (ML) @ 60.5 feet, slight petroleum odor. SILTY SAND (SM), medium brown, loose,· moist,' poorly sorted, very fine- to medium-grained sand, abundant amount of mica. BOTTOM OF BORING @ 68 feet. E~PLANATION ~ Clay [] .Silt ~'Sand [] Gravel 0.3/1.5 Ambient/Soil BOTTOM OF STANDARD PENETRATION SAMPLER @ 70 feet. PHOTOVAC READING (ppm) AMBIENT AIR/ SOIL SAMPLE 0.7/260 1.3/134 5.0/6.9 4.4/4.5 -0.3/56 0.00/6.3 :0.4/1.5 Figure 2a : LITHOLOGY AND SAMPLE DATA FOR SOlE BORING LF1 Project No. 1675 LEVINE'FRICKE CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANO NYDROGEOLOGISTS MAY87GT : Bleed Line KNOCK-OUT DRUM TANK EXCAVATION BLOWER WITH ,SILENCER EXPLANATION Valve . Sample Tap Pressure o~ Vaccum Gauge Temperature Probe S CARBON CANNISTERS C#EAIICAI AfiAI Y$1$ PETIIOL£UI~ - BORATORIE-?,, IF'lO, J. J. ('GLINi REG. CHEM. ENG~ 4100 PIERCE RD;, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) WEGENERCONSTRUCTION ATTN: DUTCH 2616 STARK STREET ~FI~EIi)? CA. 93308 . SamPle Description:' LF-1 ~69-70' ,DATE .SAMPLE~~: 5-11~87 DATE. SAMPLE 'RECEIVED @' LAB: .5-12-87 Constituent Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene. p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene Petroleum Hydrocarbo_ns Date of REPORT:5-18-87 LAB No.:8891 Reporting Analysis Reporting Units Results Level ~g/g ~g/g ~g/g ~g/g Total Petroleum HYdrocarbons og/g none detected 0.10' none detected 0.10 none detected 0.I0 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 5.00 none detected 5.00 CALIFORNIA D.O.H.S. 5020/8020: DRY MAT~ER BASIS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present '(C1 to C20) utilizing a Gaseline Factor. As outlined by the California D.O.H.S. These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents sPeCifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this .report. Analyst CHEMICAl A~ALYSlS PETROLEUM LABORATORIES, Inc. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGII. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) WEGENERCONSTRUCTION ATTN: DUTCH 2616 STARK STREET , '- BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Descriptionr LF-1 ~66-67' 5-11-87 DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED ~ LAB: 5-12-87 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene ~=/g Toluene ~g/g Ethyl Benzene ~g/g .p-Xylene ~=/g m-Xylene ~g/g o-Xylene ~g/g Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Date of RD~3RT: 5-18-87 LAB No.: 8890 · DATE ~YSIS" ~' ~n~ ~alysis Re~i~ Resul~ ~vel none deteCted 0.I0 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 5.00 none detec.ted 5.00 CALIFORNIA D.O.H.S. 5020/8020,: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYD~OCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons.present (Ci to C20) utilizinga Gasoline Factor. As outlined by the California D.O.H.S. These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS: The sum total Of all [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. Analyst £NEA41CAL ANAL YSIS PETI~OLEUA~ LABORATORIES', Inc. J. J. EGUN, REG. CHFJA. ENGL 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) WEGE~ER CONSTRUCTION ATTN: DUTCH 2616 STARK STREET BAKERSFIELD., CA. 93308 Sample Description: LF-1 ~61-62' DATE '' SAMPLE COLLECTED: 5-11-87 DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: · 7 . 5-12-87 ' C~nstituent Reporting Units Benzene ~g/g Toluene ~g/g Ethyl Benzene ~g/g p-Xylene ~=/g m-Y~vlene ~g/g o~Xylene ~g/g Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g Total Petroleum. Hydrocarbons ~g/g Date of .REPORT:5-18-87 LAB No.:8889 Analysis Results DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: . ,~ -., 5-15-87 Mi~ Re~:~orting Level none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10' none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 5.00 none detected 5.00 CALIFORNIA D.O.H.S. 5020/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS COMMENTS: PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20) utilizing a Gasoline Factor. As outlined by the California D.O.H.S. These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. TOTAL pETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-c~orinated] constituents on this report. Analyst CHEMIEAI ANAL YSI$ PETROLEUM BORATORIES, Inc. J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGll. 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93.308 PHONE327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) WBGENERCONSTRUCTION ATTN: DITCH 2616 STARK STREET BAKERSFIELD., CA. 93308 SampieD~scription: 'LF-1 @54-55' · : ..':: SAMPLE COLL--: ,' -' :'- 5-11-87 CoNstituent ~enzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene Petroleum Hydrocarbons DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 5-12-87 RePOrting Units ~/g ~g/g ~/g ~g/g ~g/g ~g/g ~g/g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0g/g Date of REPORT:'5-18-87 LAB No.:8888 DATE ANALYSIS ' .:. COMPLETED: . ::.'-.. ,-:... :- ::: i:.:'2, .' ,~-.,. ':. " :' ":: ' :'--:' 5-15-87 ' ' .: :.-*::-""~'??~ ' - ' Analysis RePOrting Results' Level · none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected' 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 0.10 none detected 5.00 none detected 5.00 CALIFORNIA D..O.H.'S. 5020/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (Cl to C20) utilizing a Gasoline Factor. As 'outlined by the California D.O.H.S. These petroleum hydro~arbons are in~ddition to the constituents .specifically defined on this report. .TOTALPETROLEUMHYDROCARBONS: The sum total of all [non-chlorinated] COnstituents on this report. Analyst CltEMIEA~ A~Ai Y$15 ~ PETROLEUAf __ BORATORIES, Inc. J. J~ EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGL 4100 PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable* Aromatics (SOIL) WEGENER CONSTRUCTION ATTN: DUTCH .2616 STARK, STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: LF-1 @14-15' . Date of REPORT: 5-18-8.7 LAB No. '. 8885 DATE :"::.. ~ ': .. -.", :*'."' .... *--~,'r~TVWn ~ LAR' ~'.-'.': "d;'.:~,:,~::.~::~'.COMPLk-'I~:D: *:;~t~!~:~!~!!_~!~~:~*/, ~ ~ ~*-: * ' ' ' ~ ..... ' , ,' ':~ ": .~ .... %%-: ~ .... -t~ ~f~?~z:~'~,'~:~'~i~;:~¢, ~: 5-11-87 ~' 5-12-87 ...~. · ..-. :?,..,.:::::. :,:'~::::;?. :;~;;.;?.. ~5.. ..... -'~t~;5~,:',~:~,:~:~;~i~, ~ Constituent Reporting Units. Benzene Toluene ~g/g Ethyl Benzene Pg/g p-Xylene ~g/g m-Xylene ~g/g o-Xylene ~g/g Isopropyt Benzene ~g/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g To,tal Petroleum Hydrocarbons ~g/g Minimum Analysis Reporting Results Level none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected- none detected none detected none detected 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 5.00 5.00 CALIFORNIA D'.O.H.S. 5020/8020: DRY MATTER BASIS. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydrocarbons present (C1 to C20)* utilizing a Gasoline Factor. As outlined by the C~lifornia D.O.H.S. These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined*on this report. TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sumtotal of All [non-chlorinated] constituents on this ~report. Analyst ~,#E~ICA~ A#ALY$i$ PETI~OL£U~ LABORATORIES, Inc. - J.J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGF,- 410~ PIERCE RD., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics (SOIL) WEGENERCONSTRUCTION AT, N: D[T~CH 2616 STARK STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Descript£on: LF-1 @44-45' DATE DATE SAMPLE SAMPLE coLLECTEDi · RECEIVED @ LAB: 5-11-87 . .i ., 5~12-87 : Constituent Reporting Units Date of REPORT:5Z18-87 LAB No~:8887 DATE ANALYSIS Miniza.~ AnaIysis Reporting Results Level Benzene ~g/g none detected Toluene ~g/g none detected Ethy.1 Benzene ~g/g none detected p-Xylene ~g/g none detected m-Xylene ~g/g none detected o-Xylene , ~g/g none detected Isopropyl Benzene ~g/g none detected Petroleum Hy~bons ~g/g none detected Total PetroleumHydr°carb°ns ~g/g none detected 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0110 5.00 5.00 CALIFORNIA D.O.H.S. 5020'/8020: DRY MA~fER ~SASIS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: Quantification of volatile hydr°carbons present · (C1 to C20) utilizing a Gasoline Factor. As ~tlinedby the California D.O.H.S.- These petroleum hydrocarbons are in addition to the constituents specifically defined on this report. ," · TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS: The sum total of ail [non-chlorinated] constituents on this report. Analyst EHVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'.'' ,~'!~. ' :~"~. i~.i"?~i..~ ,:.~ ~ U~o~ ~~. .. '~ ~""'~:"~'??:', .. ~ · , . .o. ~ " ' . ' "~. I ~:~ ... ~''z~-~ I~-~r' '...~.. ~ "' .~ I~;~ .. ~,:-'~ /~-~, · ~ ~ " '~'~ ~', ~ ~ - I ~"z~ ~ I ~ J ~c'.,o ~-I ,~4-~' ' ~ ~,., I, j .?~ Io'~ .. ~-I ~'4g~ ' I ~ / ", , ' '. . ~:ro .' ~-I ~-¢7' I ~I I ,' .... / .' .t~;~ ;. ~.-I ~-~o I ~~ , ~ I ~ ~c~ R~lJnq'ui~d by: I$;~1 ~ Olle/Time ~ fleceivjd by: ~$;~,~u.I RelinquJthed by: I$;~n~tu,~l , O:te /Time Received by: /m.'~ .. ..-: ....... Rllinquilhed by: i$;~.mnl Dale/Time Received byJ {$i~tlurtl :Relinquished by: I$.'tnttu,,I · Dele/Time flecelved by: I I I .. J Relinqui~ld by: t$i~t~u.l' O~t~/Time Rtcelved lot Llborlt0ry by: J Dale/Time ' ' .. 3- 0605 Figure 3. Example of chain-of-custody record. ~ .L, JAMES D. LEVINE EDUCATION L1EV htE.FR C 5 hydraulic and sanitary engineering hazardous waste investigations waste management and pollution laws project magagement University of California, Berkeley: M.S. civil Engineering ~'(Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineering), 1979 University of California, Berkeley: .B.S. Natural Resources, 1978 ~REGISTRATION Professional Civil Engineer: California PROFESSIONAL HISTORY ' ' Levine*Fricke Consultants, President, 1983-date Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Senior Project Engineer, 1982-1983 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Water Resource Control Engineer~ 1979-1982 East Bay Municipal Utility District, Industrial Waste Inspector, 1979 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Graduate Student Assistant, 1978-1979 REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Levine has diversified professional experience investigating, evaluating, and solving chemical waste and contamination problems. Within the past three years, he has managed over thirty projects ranging from investigation and cleanup of organic solvents in ground water; to design and construction of treatment systems for removal of heavy metals and organics from industrial effluents, and surface and ground waters; to evaluation and subsequent design of alternative waste containment schemes including slurry walls, lined ponds, and other hydraulic barriers. He has worked closely with many industries in designing innovative compliance strategies, often balancing the regulatory technical data needs with economic constraints. Mr. Levine has functioned as overall project manager for several Superfund cleanups where innovative "fast-track" solutions have been approved .and implemented. He has conducted Congressional briefings on "fast-track" environmental problem-solving, appearing before both U.S. Senate and House committee representatives° At th~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Mr. Levine guided over'a hundred chemical waste evaluations both where wastes were being proposed for discharge and where spills or inadequate waste management had caused pollution problems. For over two years, Mr. Levine was. the chief on-scene decision-maker for oil and hazar- dous chemical spills in five San Francisco Bay Area counties. In this capacity, he provided primary gUidance to industry and other public agencies in interpreting scientific results and ~ identifying and evaluating remedial solutions. ~ In many instances, Mr. Levine was responsible for recommending '~' ~and assigning appropriate limits for chemicals in the soil, ~' receiving water, and'industrial~effluents after evaluating field-~ ~i~data, toxicity~valu~s,'chemical transport meChaniSms, and '. " mitigation alternatives and costs..~Major spill assignmentS.~have · ~' included the 7000-gallon Livermore 'PcB spill~(1981)~the 80~000-' ,~' ~ gallon Avon crude oil Spill.~(1980).,, the San Francisco. Rmbarcadero. ~PCB leak.(1981), and recent~nderg~ound solvent leaks. in Santa. Clara Valley (I980-1982)~' · Prevention of contamination problems was a significant part of Mr. Levine's efforts and he has guided the redesign efforts at numerous industrial facilities in the San Francisco Bay Area, including several chemical distribution, fuel storage, and electronics manufacturing facilities. On these projects, Mr. ' Levine formulated innovative combinations of waste segregation, treatment, containment, and discharge to provide cost-effective solutions acceptable to government and industry Mr. Levine was also charged with evaluating the operations of over 30 municipal and industrial waste treatment plants in the -- Bay Area over a 2-1/2 year period. He was part of the intergovernmental team that developed and evaluatedcorrective measures at the San Jose-Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant, which were successful in preventing sludge bulking (and plant upset) during the 1981 canning season. Mr. Levine has become well-recognized for his trouble-shooting abilities and has applied these skills to successful solving of treatment plant 'upset problems at the Dublin-San Ramon Services District (sludge bulking, 1981), City of San Leandro (solids overload, 1980), and the C&H Sugar Refinery (bulking with variable organic loading, 1980). Mr. Levine's experience in hazardous waste, water resources, and waste treatment and detection systems led to his selection as the Regional Water Quality Control Board's representative to the Association of Bay Area Government's Subcommittee on Hazardous Spill Response. Mr. Levine was a founding member of the Alameda County Police and Fire Chief's Committee on Hazardous Spills, and is currently an advisor to the California Department of Fish and Game on hazardous materials detection and treatment, and water resources engineering. While studying at U.C'. Berkeley, Mr. Levine worked at the Water Board designing a ground-water monitoring program which identified the effects of radioactive discharges to the Alameda Creek watershed. Other projects included developing technical definitions for "consistent compliance~,'with state and federal pollution limits, and the investigation of heavy metal toxicities and treatment plant removal capabilities for the development of effluent limits for industrial and municipal dischargers. As Industrial Waste Inspector for the East BayMuniCipal Utility ~istrict,' Mr. Levine provided technical support for the District's surveillance activitieS,.'-performing hydraulic dispersion CalcU-~ lations on the collection.sYstem t6 examine the potential for toxic chemical upsets to the.treatment system.and to design~iow~.' maintenance sampling equipment. ~./~- ~..'~ i ~ 'i~ '~~ ~ ~ CARL A.P. FRICKE EDUCATION hydrogeology hazardous waste water resource management Quaternary geology University of wisconsin, Madison: M.S. Water Resource ~ Management, 1976 University of Wisconsin, Madison: M~S. Geology, 1976 Augustana College, Rock Island, Illinois: A,B., Geology, 1973 REGISTRATION ProfessiOnal Hydrogeologist: American Institute of Hydrology Certificate Number~365 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Levine*Fricke Consultants, Vice President and Principal Hydrogeologist, 1983-date Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Senior Project Hydrogeologist, 1978-1983 University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, Conservation and Survey Division, Assistant Professor and Hydrogeologist, 1976-1978 Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Madison, Wisconsin, Hydrogeologist, 1976 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, Hydrogeologist, 1974-1976 University of Wisconsin, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Madison, Wisconsin, Project Asst. and Research Asst., 1974-1976 REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Fricke has been actively involved in planning, managing, and implementing various geologic~ ground-water, surface-water, contaminanat and water resource management projects in the West Coast, Rocky Mountain, Mid-West and Southern states. He evaluated ground-water and surface-water supplies for a hydroelectric. pumped storage facility in New Mexico; has been involved in hydrogeologic studies and.deep-well testing for siting a national nuclear waste repository in Utah, solved water-well production problems in southern California; helped evaluate dewatering studies for a coal mine in Louisiana; evaluated the impact that a large open-pit coal mine would have on a river and ground-water in Colombia, South America; assessed the impact of oil-shale development on the water resource in western Colorado; and was involved in hydrogeologic field studies for siting a power plant in New Mexico. Mr. Fricke managed the major hydrogeologic investigation for the ETSI coal slurry pipeline. The study involved the geology, ground water, surface water, water use, water quality and geochemistry, waterlsupply and aquifer characteristics of the Powder River Basin and Black Hills in Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. Additional hydrogeologic studies for this project were conducted from Wyoming to the Gulf Coast under Mr. Fricke's direction. Mr. Fricke.also conducted hydrogeologic studies for a proposed large coal gasification project in the southern Powder River Basin of Wyoming. ~ Mr. Fricke's involvement with 'hazardous waste inVestigations has ~included evaluating subsurface movement and remediation of .~ contaminants emitted from waste ponds, leaks~and spills,-land treatment facilities, landfills and'other releases. Chemicals · ~..asSociated with 'these wastes included acids, heaVy metals.,.. PCBs,' .~. organic solvents,~ petrochemicals and other organic.andinorganic 'Substances. Contaminant sources'have includedchemical"~'.' ' manufacturing.and distribution facilities, theelectronics · industry, gasoline stations~ the~forest products industry, -..petroleum refineries., battery'manufacturers andsanitary landfills. He has designed and supervised soil boring programs, well design and construction activities, water, soil, and vegetation sampling programs, aquifer tests, lake water and lake bottom sampling programs and other'on-site investigations. Mr. Fricke has designed, built, and operated ground-water extraction. systems for these chemicals. He has worked closely with ~ regulatory agencies and private industry in interpreting and meeting regulatory requirements. At the University of Nebraska, Mr. Fricke was Chairman of a .Governor's.Task Force Subcommittee on Water Use, mandated to inventory, design, and manage a water-use data management system for the State of Nebraska. He was co-project leader for a geologic and hydrologic study covering 3,755 square miles in southwestern Nebraska. He also supervised.and conducted the drilling, geophysical'testhole logging, and well construction program conducted by the Nebraska Geological Survey, compiled the Quaternary Map of Nebraska, investigated problems and conducted meetings on ground-water use and water supply conflicts, evaluated areas for small- and largeascale water supply, and conducted basic research on the geology, ground water and streamflow throughout the state. While in Wisconsin, he was co-investigator of a geological and geotechnical investigation of erosion problems, slope stability, glacial stratigraphy, and geomorphology along Lake Michigan. Mr. Fricke planned and supervised a number of other lake studies involving field instrumentation, water budgets, water quality, lake management, lake rehabilitation; incorporating governmental, institutional, and private interests. He investigated and mapped the hydrogeology as well as the Pleistocene and Paleozoic stratigraphy of southern Wisconsin, super~;ised the University of Wisconsin's Quaternary laboratory, and evaluated and licensed sanitary landfills for the State of Wisconsin. As a private consultant, h'e mapped.the geology and investigated the potential 'for water supply near Spring Green, Wisconsin, to determine the area's potential for large recreational and residential development. As Vice President of Levine*Fricke Consultants, Carl Fricke is responsible for managing all corporate financial, tax, insurance cost estimating and business planning functions. He is also actively involved in project management, peer review an~' technical and professional development. ~ · SELECTED PUBLICATIONS PleiStocene stratigraPhy and geomorphoIogY of Central-southern · 'Wisconsin and part of northern IllinOis. (with'T.M.14Johnson),. Geoscience Wisconsin,'Wisconsin Geological and Natural HistorY~ Survey~ VolUme 8, December 1983. Design~and installation of monitoring Wells.. ~round Water Age, 16, nooS, April 1982.' Ground-water resource management in Nebraska~ (with Darryl To Pederson), Ground Water Journal, 17, no. 6, November 1979. Quaternary map 0f Nebraska. Open File Map~ Nebraska Geological Surveys Conservation and Survey Division, Uniuversity of Nebraska, scale 1:1,000,000, 1978. Ground water-surface water relationships along Elm Creek Canal, Dawson County, Nebraska. Open File Report~ Nebraska Geological Survey~ Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska, 1978. Stratigraphic relationships of tills in central-southern Wisconsin. (with T.M..Johnson). Abstract and Presentation, Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, Annual Meeting, Carbondale, 9, no.5, 1977o Shoreline erosion and bluff stability along Lake Michigan and Lake Superior shorelines of Wisconsin. (with D.M. Mickelson et al). Shore Erosion Study Technical Report, Wisconsin Coastal Management. LEV NE'FRICKE THOMAS M. JOHNSON EDUCATION Augustana College, Illinois: B.A. Geology, 1972 University of Wisconsin, Madison: M.S. Water Resources ~Management, 1975 University of Wisconsin, Madison: M,S. Geology, 1976 University of Illinois: Ph.D. in progress (ABD), Geology, 1976-present PROFESSIONAL HISTORY. Levine~Fricke Consultants, Principal HydrogeologiSt, 1986opresent Illinois State Geological Survey, Geologist and Section Head Hydrogeology and Geophysics Section, 1984-1986 Illinois State Geological Survey, Geologist,.Hydrogeology and Geophysics Section, 1975-1984 hydrogeology water resource management · computer modeling Consultant in Hydrogeology - Projects include: - Evaluating proposed hazardous-waste disposal sites and exploration for potential sites - Computer modeling ground-water flow and contaminant migration in the vicinity of a repository for high-level radioactive waste - Developing user manual for flow model - Investigating organic solvent contamination in ground-water - Evaluating remedial action plans - Calculating percolation and .computer modeling water movement through alternative cover designs at waste disposal sites in Indiana; preparing remedial action plans Invited Instructor/Lecturer at numerous seminars and workshops on hydrogeology and ground-water contamination PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS - Investigating contaminant migration of ground-water flow systems resulting from disposal of solid wastes, hazardous chemical wastes and low-level radioactive waste - Ground-water monitoring and sampling techniques for organic and inorganic constituents at waste disposal sites - The implications of water movement, waste disposal and monitoring techniques in the unsaturated zone - Computer modeling ground-water flow and contaminant migration - Modeling soil-water movement and infiltration with .regard to cover designs for waste disposal sites "~ Evaluating remedial actions at waste disposal ·.sites AFFiLIATiONS ~- · Association'~of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers ~" National Water-Well Association ' American. Institute of Hydrology PUBLICATIONS Follmer, L. R., R. H. Gilkeson and T. M. Johnson, 1976, Soil stratigraphic relationship, Ogle County, Illinois.: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 8, no. 4, p. 477. Gilkeson~ R. H., T. M. Johnson and L. R. Follmer, 1976, Ground-water contamination from disposal of toxic industrial wastes in Ogle County, Illinois: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 8, no. 6, pp. 884-885~ Cartwright, I., R. H. Gilkeson and T. M. Johnson, 1976, Investigation of hydrogeologic conditions for disposal of toxic .wastes in Byre. area, Ogle County, Illinois: .Report to the Ill..- Environmental Protection Agency, Ill l-'State Geological SUrvey,. unpublished ms. ' -- Johnson, T, M.. and K. Cartwright, 'I977, Hydrogeology of a landfill and adjacent municipal well .field, Geneseo, Henry -~'County, Illinois: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 9, no. 5~ p. 611-612. Fricke, C. and T. M. Johnson, 1977, Stratigraphic relationships of tills .in central-southern Wisconsin: Geol. Soc. Amer., Abstracts with Program, v. 9, no. 5, p. 596. Gilkeson, R. H., K. Cartwright, L. R. Follmer and T. M. Johnson, 1977, Contribution of surficial deposits, bedrock, and industrial wastes to certain trace elements in ground water: Proc. of 15th Ann. Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering Symposium, Pocatella, Idaho~ p. 17-38. Johnson, T. M. and K. Cartwright, 1978, Monitoring the Unsaturated Zone in the vicinity of sanitary landfills: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 10, no. 6, p. 257. Johnson, T. M. and'K. Cartwright, 1978, Implications of solid waste disposal in the Unsaturated Zone: In Proc. of 1st Ann. Conf. of Applied Research and Practice on Munic. and Industrial -Wastes, Madison, WI; ISGS Reprint 1978-0, 15 p. Cartwright, K. and T. M. Johnson, 1978, The monitoring of leachate migration in unsaturated soils in the vicinity of sanitary landfills: Rept. to Ill. Inst. for Environmental Quality, ISGS unpublished ms., 240 p. Johnson, T. M., 1979, Hydrogeologic conditions relative .to the disposal of radioactive industrial wastes in a residential area in DuPage Countyf Illinois: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 11, no. 5, p. 232. Elzeftawy, A., T. M. Johnson and K. Cartwright, 1979, Field and laboratory study of water and ion transport in the Unsaturated Zone beneath waste disposal sites: EDS,.. Trans, Amer. Geophysical ~Union, o. 60, no. 18, p. 258. Johnson, T. M. and A. Elzeftawy, 1979, Field and laboratory study of water and solute transport in the Unsaturated Zone beneath waste disposal sites: Geol. Soc. America, Abstracts with Program, v. 11, no. 7, p. 452. Johnson, T. M. and K. CartWright, 1980, The monitoring of leachate migration in the Unsaturated Zone in the vicinity' of 'sanitary landfills: Ill. State Geological Survey, Circular 514, .. Do ~. ~indorff and P.·-:'B; du~ontelle; ~98~, ~ydrogeologic. Considerations in Hazardous Waste Disposal'~inIllinois: Ill: '-~ .. State Geol. Survey,:. Environmental Geology: Notes 94~-20 p.'i:~ ..' ': Cartwright, .K,:, R. H, Gilkes0n' 'and T~ M...Johnson, '1981, . HydrogeologicConsiderations in hazardous waste disposal: In: w. Back and R. Le'tolle (Guest-editors) SympOsium on Geo-chemistry of Ground-water -- 26th International Geological Congress, Jour. Hydrology, v. 54, p. 357-369. Herzog.' B. L', K. 'Cartwright, ~T. M. jOhnson and H~ J. H. Harris, 1981, A study of trench covers to minimize infiltration at waste disposal sites: Ill. State Geol. Survey, Contract Report No. 1981-5, US.NRC NUREG/CR-2478, 236 p. Johnson~ T. M., K. Cartwright and R. M. Schuller, 1981, Moni-toFing of leachate migration in the Unsaturated Zone in the vicinity of sanitary landfills: Ground Water Monitoring Review, v. 1, no. 3, p. 55-63. Johnson~ T. M., W. J. Morse and K. Cartwright, 1981, Codisposal of industrial sludges in sanitary landfills: Ill. State Geol. Survey, Open-File Contract Report, 66 p. Klein, S., T. M. Johnson and K. Cartwright, 1982, Soil-moisture characteristics and hydraulic conductivity of compacted fine-grained soils for use in covers at waste disposal sites: Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union, EOS, v. 63, no. 18, p.329. Johnson, T. M., K. Cartwright and B. L. Herzog, 1982, An investigation of layered coVers designed to limit infiltration at waste disposal sites: Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Programs, v. 14, no. 7, p. 523. Johnson, T. M., T. H. Larson, B. L. Herzog, Ko Cartwright and C. J. Stohr, 1982, Trench Cap Study: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Participants' Information Meeting DOE Low-Level Waste Management Program, Denver, CO. August 31 - Sept. 2, 1982, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/NFW-82/18, p. 597-606. Johnson, T. M., K. Cartwright, B. L. Herzog and T. H. Larson, 1983, An investigation of layered covers designed to limit infiltration at waste disposal sites; In: M. G. Yalcintas, ed., Proceed. of Symposium on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal, Washington, DC, Sept. 29-30, 1982, US NRC NUREG/CP-0028, Conf-820911, v. 3, p. 309-324. Griffin, R. A., K. Cartwright, P. B. DuMontelle, L. R.~Follmer, C. J. Stohr, T. M. Johnson, M. M. Killey,.R.E. Hughes, B.'L. Herzog and W. J. Morse,'1983, Investigation of clay soil behavior an~ migration of industrial chemicals at Wilsonville, Illinois: Proc. of Ninth Annual Research Symposium on Solid andHazardous WAste, U.S. Environmental 'Protection-Agency, Cincinnati,' OH, !9 Johnson, T. M., T. H. Larson, Bi~ L. Herzoq, K. Cartwright,'C."J-'- ' Stohr and S. J Klein, ~1983, Astudy of trench covers to minimize infiltration at waste 4isposalsites: Task II .report.-- LaboratorY evaluation and computer'modeling of trench cover .... design: Ill. State Geol. Survey Contract Report, US NRC NUREG/CR-2478, 156 p. Johnson, T. M., B. L. Herzog, T. H. Larson and K. Cartwright, 1983, Modeling of moisture movement through layered trench 'covers: In:J. W. Mercer, P. S. C. Rao, and I. W. Marine,' eds., Role of the Unsaturated Zone in Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Disposal, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, p. 11-26. Johnson, T. M., R. A. Griffin, K. Cartwright, L. R. Follmer, B. L. Herzog and W. J. Morse, 1983), Hydrogeologic investigations of failure mechanisms and migration of organic chemicals at Wilsonville, Illinois: Proceedings of Third National Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and'Ground Water Monitoring, Columbus, OH, May 24-27, 1983, Ground Water Technology Division, National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH, 32 p. Klein, S., T. M. Johnson and Ko Cartwright, 1983, Moisture characteristics of compacted soils for use in trench covers: In: J. W. Mercer, P. S. C. Rao and I. W. Marine, eds., Role of the · Unsaturated Zone in Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Disposal, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, p. 101-111. Johnson, T.M., R.A. Griffin, Ko Cartwright, L.R. Follmer, B.L. Herzog and W.J. Morse. 1983. Hydrogeologic investigations of failure mechanisms and migration of organic chemicals at Wilsonville, Illinois: Proceedings of Third National Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and Groundwater Monitoring, National Water Well AssOciation, Worthington, OH, p. 413-420. Johnson, T.M., T.H. Lason, B.L. Herzog, K. Cartwright and C.J. Stohr. 1983. A study of trench covers to limit infiltration at waste disposal sites: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Participant's Information Meeting, DOE Low-Level Waste Management Program, EG & G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Fails, ID, p. 160-166. Johnson, T.M., T.H. Larson, L. Herzog,' K. Cartwright and C.J. Stohr. 1984. Performance of layered soil covers using the wick effect to minimize infiltration at waste disposal sites: Proceedings of Conference: Characterization and Monitoring of the Vadose Zone, National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH, p. 682-718. Griffin, R.A.,~R.E.. Hughes, L.R. Follmer, C.J. Stohr, W.J. Morse, T.M. Johnson, J.K. Bartz, J.D. Steele, K. Cartwright, M.M. Killey ~.ahd P.B. DuMontelle. 1984. Migration of. industrial chemicals ~nd'soil-waste interactions at. Wilsonville, Illinois: Proc.'of Tenth Annual Research'Symposium on Solid andHazardous Waster' U.S. Environmental protection Agency,' Cincinnati, OH, · EPA-600/9-84-007,' p. 61-77. ' ~'~ -- ~.~. :~ :L~.-~ ~... ~. ' Griffin, R.A., B,Li Herzog, T.M~Johns°n et al. 1985.. MechaniSms of contaminant migration through a'clay barrier,~ case study'. Wilsonville, 'IL: USEPA Research Symposium on Solid and Hazardous Waste; May 1985; Ft. Mitchell~ KY.' " Cartwright, K., T.M. Johnson, B.L. Herzog and C.J. Stohr. '1985. A study of trench covers to minimize infiltration at waste · disposal sites: Task IV report: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ~ Commission. "' Johnson, T.M., R.C..Berg and B.Lo Herzog. 1985.. Evaluation of the proposed waste containment design for management of radioactive wastes at the U.S. Department of Energy, Niagara Falls Storage Site Near Lewiston~ New York: Illinois State Geological Survey, Open File'Report, 29 p. List of recent lectures, and Dresentations to Drofessional orqanizations, seminars and workshops: 1. "Ground-Water Monitoring", U.S. EPA seminar on transPort of viruses and organics in the subsurface, Ada, OK, March, 1979. 2. "Hydrogeologic Considerations in Waste Disposal", N. Central Section of American Institute of Prof. Geologists and Association of Engineering Geologists, Lemont, IL, April, 1979. 3.~ "Geologic Considerations in Hazardous Waste Disposal", Univo o~ Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering:-..Hazardous Waste .Management Practices Institute, Madison, WI, July,-1979.' · .41 "Monitoring the'unsaturat&d zone-, 'Conf. on~ EnVironmental' Monitoring,~sponsored by Geraghy'and October, 1979' 5. ."Ground-water Monitoring forLandfills",.Univ~ ~of Wisconsin-E~tension, Dept. of Engineering: Sanitary Landfill Site Selection and Design Institute, Madison, WI, December, 1979. 6. "Interpretation of Ground-Water Monitoring Data Collected in the Vicinity of Landfills" and "Monitoring in the Unsaturated Zone", National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement, Technical Workshop: Groundwater Quality Monitoring at' Land Disposal Sites, Chicago, IL, January, 1980. 7. "Geological Considerations in Hazardous Waste Disposal", Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept of Engineering: Hazardous Waste Management Practices Institute, Madison, WI, July, 1980. 8. "Groundwater Contamination -- Remedial Actions", Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering: Groundwater Quality Protection Institute, Madison, WI, July, 1980. 9. "Monitoring Ground-Water Quality in the Saturated and Unsaturated Zones", Tennessee Dept. of Public Health, Solid Waste Management Div., 10th Ann. Solid Waste Conf., Memphis, TN, March, ·1981. 10' "The Monitoring of Leachate Migration in the Unsaturated Zone in the Vicinity of Sanitary Landfills", National Water Well Assoc., Ground-Water Monitoring Symposium, Columbus, OH. 11. "Groundwater Contamination Field Evaluation and' Investigative Procedures" and "Groundwater Quality Rehabilitation", Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering: Seminar for Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison, WI, January, 1982. 12. "Monitoring and Unsaturated Zone"' and "Remedial Actions", Illinois State Geological Survey and Illinois State Water Survey: Groundwater Monitoring.Workshop, Champaign, IL, February, 1982 and June, 1982. . 13. "Groundwater Contamination -- Field 'Evaluation and Investigative Procedure" and "Groundwater Quality Rehabilitation", Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering: Ground-Water.Quality Protection Institute, Madison, WI, March, 1982. I4. "Modeling of Moisture Movement Through Covers Designed to Limit Infiltration at Waste Disposal Sites", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory.Commission, Symposium on Low-Level Radioactive Waste D'isposaI,·Washington, DC, September,-1982. 15. '"W~ste DiSposal'and Groundwater Contamination", Minnesota ~Ground Water Association, Minneapolis, MN, November, 1982. 16.. "Field EValuation and InvestigatiVe'Procedures Related~to' Groundwater Contamination"' and "Remedial Actions", Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering: Groundwater Quality Protection Institute, Madison, WI, February, 1983. 17. "Groundwater Quality Containment and Rehabilitation" Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Dept. of Engineering: Groundwater for Lawyers Institute, Madison, WI, May, .1983. 18. "Hydrogeologic Investigations of Failure Mechanisms and Migration of Organic Chemicals at Wilsonville, Illinois", National Water Well Association, Third National Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and Ground Water Monitoring, Columbus, OH, May, 1983. THOMAS E. GRAF geotechnical engineering grouting EDUCATION Stanford University, Stanford, California: M.S. Geotechnical Engineering, 1979 Stanford University, Stanford, California: B.S. Civil "~ Engineering, 1976 REGISTRATION · Civil Engineer: California,.1982 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Levine*Fricke Consultants, Senior Geotechnical Engineer, 1984-date Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Staff Engineer to Project Engineer, 1980-84 Pressure Grout Company, South San Francisco, California, Laborer to Chief Engineer, 1968-1980 Gordon Ball Construction, Hayward, California, BART Test Tract, Assistant Project Engineer, 1973 William Simpson Construction, San Francisco, California, San Francisco General Hospital Addition, Assistant Project Engineer, 1972 REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Since 1980, Mr. Graf has worked on and been in charge of a broad range of geotechnical engineering projects. His assignments include soil investigations; foundation studies; investigations for waterfront and shoreline developments; foundation construction inspection; design and inspection of grouting programs; hazardous waste studies for industrial and commercial sites. Among the projects typical of Mr. Graf's experience are: - WMATA - Rapid Transit, Washingtonf D.C. - Design and construction of cement grout reinforcement for caving soils in underground tunnels. - ALYESKA - Oil Pipeline, Alaska - Design and construction of chemical and cement grout curtains for water flow control under pipeline. - Design and construction of lime injection treatment for expansive ~oils; Pittsburgh,'California. - BART, Walnut Creek California; Design~and construction of compaction grout lifting of settled tracks. - Sealand - Dutch Harbor, Alaska - Design and construction of grouted anchors for ppost-tensioned dock structures. - Pacific Park Plaza hi-rise condominiums, Emeryville, California, - site improvement and foundation construction inspection. - ~Holiday Inn, Pleasanton, California - foundation design % · - Snake Road Landslide, Oakland, Caiifornia- slope stability investigation and analyses. - Alameda Marina Village, Alameda, California - settlement analyses for fill on deep Bay Mud deposits~ - San Lorenzo Valley Wastewater Management Project~ Boulder Creek, California - geologic and geotechnical reconnaissance for sewage collector lines and disposal sites in unstable hillside areas. - Design and construction of plastic liner application for waste pond; Pinole, California. - Design of drainage facilities for dredge spoils ponds; Richmond, California. - Design and construction of gasoline recovery system; Burlingame, California° - Preparation of bid documents for and inspection of underground tank removals; Palo Alto, California. Prior to 1980, Mr. Graf was responsible for research, design and construction activities during different periods at Pressure Grout Company. The work included development of state-of-the-art grouting techniques and materials. Mr. Graf has worked with problems in tunneling, mining, roadway and pipeline construction, underground water flow~ and general building settlement. PUBLICATIONS Long term aging effects on chemically stabilized soil (with G.W. Clough and J. Warner). ASCE Conference on Grouting in Geotechnical Engineering, February 1982. CAPABILITIES AND SERVICES Levine*Fricke has experience in applying a wide range of-. technical knowledge to problems in the fields of water resources and hazardous waste management. Specific areas of .expertise include: *Hydrogeology *Hydrology *Sanitary and Process Engineering *Civil and Geotechnical Engineering *Hydraulic Engineering ~ .... *Soil and Water Chemistry *Geology *Decision Theory We provide consulting services to a wide range of industrial and public clients including'chemical and oil refineries and distribution facilities, real estate and property management firms, banks,-legal counsel, printed circuitboar~ shops, woodtreating facilities, equipment assembly plants, many types of industrial manufacturers, mining companies~ con- struction and development firms, public utilities, municipal- ities, local and State resources and emergency response agencies. The services we' provide include: *Hazardous-material spills, planning and response *Hazardous-waste management evaluations *Soil and ground-water contaminant investigations *Remedial action planning and design *Design of industrial~waste treatment systems *Analytical and numerical modeling *Environmental impact assessment studies *Siting studies *Regulatory,.permitting and planning assistance *Air and water quality monitoring *Water resources~planning *Aquifer testing, well design and dewatering *Water supply evaluations *Project management *Risk Assessment In conducting our work, we seek to fully involve our. clients in decision-making by keeping them up-to-date on work in. progress. The format used to present technical and non- technical aspects of a project enables our clients to inter" Pret highly .technical material and to make informed program "-~ecisions. We monitor the design and execution of our pro- . ~rams to.see that data are collected objectively and.effi- .ciently, .and.that~data are used for their'intended purpose .... All chemical and geotechnical laboratory work is sub~ ~ ~. ~- contracted to qualified laboratories approved by our clients. Quali~y control is.clOsely monitored in deSigninglaborato~Y programs,.SoiI~and ground-water sampling in the~field,~evalu. ating field data and in preparing project reports.~ We rou- tinely contract with colleagues in the academic community for peer review and assistance with specific technical needs. These arrangements are made on a project-by-project basis to use appropriate talent when it is needed. ~ L VJN -FRIJCKt Control Data Corporation Sperry Corporation Davila International Circuits, Inc. Rolm Corporation S~nta Fe pacific Realty Corporation ~ewlett-Packard Great western Chemical Company Wickes Companies, Inc. Jones Chemicals, Inc. Becton-Dickinson Clorox E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company United Technologies-Chemical Systems Division Reliance Universal, Inc. EAL Corporation Magnetic Peripherals, Incorporated Alamo Car Rental ~Santa Fe Land Improvement Company MCcutchen, Doyle, Brown and Enersen Landels, Ripley and Diamond Alameda County District Attorney's Office Harding Lawson and Associates Ventura County District Attorney Mobil Oil Corporation National Water Well Association Woodward-Clyde Consultants ' LEV INE.FRICKE PROJECT REFERENCES Oil Refinery, San Francisco Bay Area,' California Soil and ground-water conditions were examined at a refinery land-treatment facility. Project involved installing m~nitoring wells~ interpreting the site hydrogeology, 'assessing the potential ~$or contamination, and the developing closure and ~.regulatory-response strategies. ~(1420) " Gasoline Service station, Mountain View, Cai'~fornia Possible gasoline contamination at a service station in Mountain'' View was investigated. Installed an early warning leak-deteCtion system. (1023) .:~..' ,'~ Chemical Manufacturer and DistribUtion Facility, San Francisco Bay Area, California Investigated soil and ground-water solvent contamination and '-~ designed a ground-water recovery program. Entailed on-site and off-site investigation, distinguishing between several possible different sources (more than two companies in the area stored and used some of the Same chemicals), assessing Contaminant migration, designing and installing a monitoring well system and meeting with State and local officials. (1050) Electronics Manufacturing Facilities; Sunnyvale, Palo Alto, Mountain View, California Examined subsurface solvent and PCB contamination and evaluated remedial options at several industrial facilities for'a large computer manufacturer. Involved well installation to depths exceeding 200 feet, soil sampling, well testing, soil gas data evaluations, chemical transport assessments, source identification, remedial strategy development, risk assessment and costing. (1020-1024) Wood-Treating Facility, Central Valley, California Investigated shallow subsurface contamination and designed, constructed and operated a ground-water extraction and treatment system for a wood-treatment plant in Northern California. Project involved public hearings, negotiations with State and local agencies, a press conference, designing and implementing a ground-water and waste-water sampling plan, field work, and designing and constructing remedial measures. Contamination consisted of chromium, arsenic and copper. (1060) Chemical Manufacture and Distribution Facility, San Francisco Bay Area, California Investigated subsurface Solvent contamination and designed constructed and operated a ground-water extraction and treatment system. Involved on-site and off-site work, pump and slug testing of wells, soil and water sampling, designing, installing and operating monitoring and ground-water extraction wells and treatment system (air stripper, carbon adsorption units) and ancillary equipment, meeting with State officials. (1080) Chemical' Manufacturinq Facility, Delta/San Joaquin River Area, California Ground-water investigation for liquid-waste disposal ponds containing lead and other waste products. Involved installing and sampling monitoring wells, pump tests, studying ground-water flow and movement of contamination, assessing impact on off-site locations (water-supply wells, surface water), remedial program supervision and certification..(1310) Chemical Manufacturinq and Distribution FacilitYlSan Francisc° Ba~ Area, California Soil and ground-water investigation involving!chlorinated solvents. Project involved soil and ground-water sampling, installing'monitoring wells, borehole geophysical.logging,' designing and conducting pump tests,.assessing contaminant · movement and potentialoff-site impact. (1102) 'PlaStic Products ManUfacturer, San Francisco Bay Area, California' Evaluated soil and ground-water contamination by solvents and phthlates. Involved designing, installing, sampling and testing ground-water monitoring/extraction wells, assessing ground-water flow and contaminant migration, assessing off-site impact, evaluating influence of nearby stream on ground-water flow and chemical quality, and remedial program design. Quantitative risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis for various remedial action alternatives. (1093) Chemical Manufacturer and Distributor, Los Anqeles Area, California Investigated soil, surface-water and ground-water contamination by organic solvents and petroleum products. Studied regional and local ground-water flow systems, ground-water use,.hydrogeology of area° Conducted tank tests, installed monitoring wells, sampled soil and water, designed, installed and operated remedial program. Provided technical information for transfer of facility ownership. (1440) Electronics Manufacturing Facility, Austin, Texas Investigated the potential for subsurface contamination at a site prior to facility construction, site had been previously used as a landfill and contained metals, low-level radioactive waste, organic compounds and other chemicals in solution and adsorbed onto the sediments. Assessed potential contamination distribution and movement in the subsurface, potential.for impact on nearby stream and ground-water supplies. (1009) Electronics Manufacturinq Facility, San Francisco Bay Area, California Evaluated soil and ground-water contamination at the site and neighboring properties. Guided property purchaser through steps needed to assess potential liability involved in acquiring property contaminated by previous owner and by contamination migration from off-site sources. (1020) Lumber Mill, Sierra Nevada Foothills, California Investigated the extent and concentration of phenols and metals in subsurface soils, identified and evaluated remedial options for resolving residual contamination problem. (1061) Chemical Manufacturinq and DistribUti°h Facility, Chicaqo, Illinois Studied and made recommendations regarding the hydrogeol~y of the area, potential for soil and ground'water contamination and movement,'possible impacts on surface- and ground-water supplies, and pertinent regulations and governing agencies affecting c6ntamination originating.from the facility.~(ll00) Abandoned AsbeStos Mill, Central" Vat~e¥, California_ ~ -~-~ ·-~ Investigating asbestos tailings contamination and designing'and'~i/''~' constructing stream diversion, spillway structure, erosion control features and clay cap. Project involved preparihgsuperf~n~ Remedial Investigation.Feasibility~St~dyto 'comply with site's Superfund designation. Sediment sampling and a results-oriented approach led to the swift remedial action with minimal superfluous study. Guided Project through public hearings, EPA, State agencies and local concerns. (1018) Law Firm, San Francisco, California- Provided technical consulting to attorneys handling ground-water contamination project with multiple potentially responsible parties. Assisted in legal and technical decision-making process in addition to performing technical work and presentation. Technical work included: defining extent of organic solvent plume using geophysical methods and monitoring wells (some to depths greater than 400 feet), pump testing of aquifer, and design and cost evaluation of remedial alternatives. (1210) Rental Car Facility, San Dieqo, California Investigating suspected gasoline contamination at a rental car facility in San Diego. Analysis results for soil samples from test borings revealed that significant amounts of gasoline had not leaked from the underground storage tanks. (1115) Electronics Manufacturinq Facility, Sunnyvale, California Evaluated soil and ground-water contamination by organic solvents. Project involved designing, installing and sampling shallow monitoring and extraction wells and deeper~ double-cased monitoring wells. Also designed and constructed a ground-water extraction and treatment system and evaluated the potential of abandoned wells to act as conduits for contaminant movement. Met with State officials. (1215) Optical Lens Manufacturing Facility, Sonoma County, California Assessed ground-water contamination by organic solvents and evaluated alternative remedial measures. Volatile organic solvent concentrations measurements from a soil-gas survey were used to help evaluate the lateral extent of shalloWground-water contamination and efficiently locate monitoring and extraction wells. Project included a hydrogeologic.evaluation of potential effects on nearby, deep municipal well. Designed, installed and sampled monitoring/extraction wells provided a detailed assessment of the ground-water flow system and the contamination's vertical extent. (1107) Chemical Manufacturinq and Distribution Facility, Salt Lake City, Utah Designed a wastewater consolidation and neutralization system to treat all industrial wastewater flows generated at the facility. Previously the facility had been discharging untreated wastewater~ f%~ws to the environment with ultimate recharge to the ground water. The wastewater handling system was designed to enable the facility to neutralizeand discharge all wastewater directly~to the sanitary sewer, thus eliminating their environmental.eXPosure~ A design report was~prepared for the client which provided detailed plans and specifications for s~ructures and equipment required for the sytem. ~(1054). Enerq7 Company Oil Field,' Bakersfield,~California Provided a technical evaluation of the client's dual alkali scrubber system including sampling and process analysis. The client's scrubber system generated a significant volume of filter cake waste as a process by-product which was disposed of as hazardous waste at significant expense. Evaluated process modifications to render the waste non-hazardous and negotiated with regulatory agencies to delist the waste. Evaluated re-use/disposal alternatives for handling the waste by-product. (1013) ' Real Estate Development Company, San Francisco, California Conducted site investigations and prepared remedial closure plan for a 19-acre site affected with lead and zinc adjacent to the San Francisco Bay. Expedited regulatory approval for the project within approximately 76 months where previous consultants had been unsuccessful. Prepared detailed plans and specifications and cost projections for construction. Managed construction for the project which included interfacing with regulatory agencies. Total project cost of $5.5 million was approximately two percent. below the preliminary project estimates. (1012) Computer Disk Drive Manufacturer, San Jose, California Designed and implemented a complete remedial clean-up program for removing organic contaminants from ground water. The project was handled from the initial hydrogeologic investigation phase through the design and start-up of a carbon adsorption/air stripping treatment system. Associated tasks included: drilling and sampling on- and off-site wells; pump testing the wells using Theis, slug and step-drawdown pump tests; computer modeling to determine extraction well placement and the expected area of capture for pollutants; data evaluation towards the design'of the carbon/air stripping treatment system; preparing plans and specifications for the treatment system and the subsequent on-line placement a~d fine tuning of the system operation. (1085) Car Rental Aqency, San Francisco Bay Area, California Investigated subsurface gasoline contamination due to possible on-and/or off-site storage. Designed and installed a gasoline extraction system which included monitoring wells and a collection trench. Soil-gas sampling~was used to provide data on the extent and concentrations of volatile organic.compounds. Conducted an additional investigation to determine the gasoline's original .' source. The investigation included laboratory analysis of the nature of the gasoline, assessing degradation of the petroleum -' product and gas chromatography for fingerprinting the'contaminant''~' and possible source products. Successfully constructed an ~ extraction system that removed the free product and monitored~ its~ effectiveness. The. problem source was also identified, (1010) Shoreline Landfill Site, San Francisco Bay Area~California' -i.~-'. Investigated subsurface lead contamination. Assessed the extent'~o~~ the problem, made recommendationsand estimated costs~fOr. remedial action° (1015) Plastic Bottle Seal Manufacturinq Facility~ Central Valley, ~ California Investigated subsurface gasoline contamination from leaking underground tank. Project involved drilling and sampling borings ' to assess lateral and vertical extent of contamination. (1057) 'LF 1675 4/10/87 PROPOSED MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR GASOLINE-AFFECTED SOILS AT UNION CEMETERY, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION Evidence of gasoline leakage into surrounding soils was discovered when an underground gasoline storage tank at the Union Cemetery was excavated in 1986. Subsequent subsurface investigations by B.C. Laboratories during September-October 1986 and by Soils Engineering, Inc. (SEI) dur- ing January 1987 indicated that gasoline had affected soils from the base of the former gasoline tank to a maximum depth of approximately 40 feet. Soil boring locations are illustrated in Figure 1. Laboratory analysis results for soil sampled from bor- ings advanced directly under the former tank location and the immediate surrounding area indicated total volatile hydrocarbons (TVH) were present at concentrations ranging from not detected (ND) to 15,310 ppm. Chemical analysis results indicated 2,378 ppm TVH in a soil sample from a depth of 40 feet immediately beneath the former tank location. However, soil samDles from a 45-foot depth in the same boring contained only 1.72 ppm TV H, possibly indicating the basal edge of the hydrocarbon plume. Sediments encountered in the soil borings consisted of inter- bedded deposits of clayey sand, silty sand, sand, and occasional layers of clayey silt and sandy clay. Ground water was reportedly not encountered in any of the borings, which extended to a maximum depth.of 45 feet. SEI reported that depth to ground water in the site vicinity was greater than 150 feet (according to Water Supply Report 1985, Kern County Water.Agency). Results of previous investigations suggest that unsaturated soils containing significant amounts of gasoline were confined to a relatively limited area (less than about 8 feet laterally from the tank) surrounding the former tank location and extending to a maximum depth of approximately 45 feet directly beneath the tank (Figures 2 and 3). Gasoline compounds were not detected in two shallower borings only eight feet from the former tank location. These measurements are confirmed by the type of sediments encountered since, due to the more permeable nature of the soils underlying the tank, leakage from the tank would not be expected to spread laterally to a significant degree in the unsaturated zone. APR 1 ~ 1987 PROPOSED MITIGATIVE STRATEGY: IN SITU VAPOR EXTRACTION The proposed strategy for mitigating gasoline-affected soils is vapor extraction. Cased borings will be installed in the affected area to extract the solvent vapors in situ. The soil gas extracted from the vadose (unsaturated) zone will carry volatile organics with it, reducing their concentrations in the soil. It is estimated that three vapor-extraction borings installed to depths of approximately 40 feet at the location of the removed gasoline tank will be sufficient to provide capture of soil gas from the area of gasoline-affected soils. The casings will be screened throughout their entire length. The need for additional borings will be evaluated based on monitoring of system perfor- mance after startup. A manifold will be installed to connect the casings to a positive displacement blower. This will create a vacuum in the casings, causing soil gas'to flow from the vicinity of the casings to the blower. Air flow from the blower will be piped to a vapor-phase treatment system consisting of carbon cannisters to effect organic compound removal before discharging air to the atmo- sphere. Vacuum gages, sample points, and control valves will be provided on the upstream side of the blower to monitor influent vapor flow. The blower will have a rating of about 100 cubic feet per minute (cfm). Additional sample points will be provided down- stream of the blower to monitor for VOC breakthrough. When the lead carbon cannisters show breakthrough, they will be recharged with fresh vapor phase carbon and moved to the polish position while the former polish units are moved to the lead position. In this way, the freshest carbon will always be in contact with the exiting air. Soil gas will be sampled and flow rates measured after start-up to obtain data for calculating VOC removal rates from the area. Flow rates will be measured at the time of sample collection. Vacuum readings will also be taken at each extraction location to monitor changes in flow conditions. The extraction system will be optimized to limit removal rates and air flow by adjusting the valves in the manifold system. The estimated VOC loading to the atmosphere will depend on the rate of organic compound removal from the soil mass. The carbon adsorption system is designed.reduce the VOCs in the emission from the blower by at least 90 percent. Because of the diffi- culty in predicting the rate of gasoline removal from the soil mass when a vacuum is applied through cased borings, carbon cannisters will be installed in a series arrangement for start-up. A report will be prepared documenting all construction activities and assessment of chemical analysis results to determine whether additional soil sampling and/or soil-gas extraction are neces- sary. If further work is deemed unnecessary, the report will document site closure. 105486 STREET Fence j , ~ · 3rd Hole · ~nd Holo > eB-3 ~ i I ~ Approximate Former ~ I T~n~ , e C e I eA I Location 1 st Ho~e I I B- 1 I ~ I ! ~ B ~~ ROAD ~ Soil borin~ locagion 0 5 fee~ Approx. Sca}e Hap Source: SEI Union Cemetery.Figure Figure 1 : SOIL BORING LOCATION MAP LEVINE-Fi~ICKE Project No. 1675 CONSU~T,NG ENGINEERS A.O .yo. OItEOLO61GTS APE87JH Depth (feet) 0 25 3O 35 40 45 South B-2 B A ND Sd SiSd 2nd Hole B=3 I i C1Sd · FB-10 · |T-37 --~-- '.. ............. ~EB-91 ' C1Sd =2"-"'--'" |X-660' ~..-'"-'. ':--- -" [,TVH-13~0~ ·----~. ~ _'~- -~ - - -- ~ ~__ ~--- - ----' -'": B-11 ...... )T-2.~7 . EB47 ..... tEB-13q X-~3 IX-800 TVH-3228 [TVH-6157 ~:.::--... ................ F~-~7 :".:: ........... ~ /T-311 TD=26 ~ ::" ' ~ 4 ' ' ~-'.:'-. LT-2~2 I X-1100 :..:-.; ~F:- lX-ego .::::j/-- ~'."?.t:!'"" ~'B- 22 LTVH- 12510 ; , -. :..:.~r Si Sd · .'.;:.::i~ . ~i*'.'.'.'".. lT-~O ':.::'/';;/-~_:. ........ ~-:"." ' '"*~ EB-35 .,,.. '-~'~= .... '""" ' X-220 · ~';- ;' · ~- ..... .-~ Sd 1 .... ~..-...?'.--. -- .... :.::." ....... 2 J ND ....... ~ EB-98 -~- I X-580 TD=~5 ~ [.TVH-2378 rB-29.2 /T-206.8 ..- ..... ,~ EB-92.7 · ..-' /x-s~o ./ LWH'l .s.3'° . T-9.3 X-300 TVH-4567 Approximate Extent of Hydrocarbon Plume North 3rd Hole ND ND ND TD=20' T- EB- X- lB- TVH - EXPLANATION Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Xylene (p,m and o) Isopropyl Benzene Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND - Not detected Sample concentrations in parts per billion (ppb) Sd - Sand Si - Silt Cl - Clay Horizontal not to scale Figure 2 : SOUTH - NORTH CROSS SECTION Project No. 1675 LEVINE' FRICKE CONSULTI#G ENGI#EEII$ A#O HYOIIQGEOLOGISTS APR87JH Depth (feet) 5 '10 15 2O 25 30 35 q0 ~5 East West 8-1 ClSa A C 1st Hole : P-b~o7 ug/kg PbNO'(<~'ug/kg) PbND NO T0=25' EXPLANATION B - Benzene T - Toluene EB - Ethyl Benzene X o Xylene (p~m and o) lB - Isoprop¥l Benzene TVH - Total Volatile Hydrocarbons ND - Not detected Sample concentrations in parts per billion (ppb) Sd - Sand Si - Silt Cl - Clay Horizontal not to scale Figure 3 : EAST-WEST CROSS SECTION Project No. 1675 LEVINE-FRICKE CONSULTING ENGINEERS MIO #TOKGGEGLOGISTS APR87JH HEARING KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT,~ _ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION'.~.~__ 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield CA 93305 (805) 86f-3636 FACILITY (dba): ADDRESS: PERSON CITED: ' OWNER: VIOLATIONS ALLEGED: (law, section number and description)' TYPE BUSINESS: TITLE: ADDRESS: CT~. PAS~ INSPECTION HISTORY: (dates and violation section numbers) SANITARIAN/SPECIALIST: SUPERViSOR/SPECIALIST:. DATE: APPROVAL/DENIAL DATE: DATE OF HEARING: ~20-~g7 TIME: ~;Z~/~/~ PLACE: ~'~f~, ~,."~f PE~NS, P~NT AND AFFILIATION: ~- ~ ~~/ ~~. ~ ~~ ~2~ Original to File via Director; copies to. Person Cited,-Owner a'nd Sanitarian/Specialist IfleaRh 580 4110 1010 7-83) ,0. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Ja'nuar~y 19, 1987 Division of Environmental Health. Department of Public Health County of Kern 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA. 93305 File 86-4981 Attention: Bill Scheide Subject: Investigation of leakage from removed underground storage tank at Union Cemetery 700 Potomac Avenue Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have .performed a field investigation and laboratory testing program at the subject site. Our scope of work consisted of three borings around Boring A, that had' been drilled by B.C. Laboratories, 1st. hole, 2nd.. :hole, 3rd. hole, Borings A, B, and C, to determine the extent of the lateral contamination and to provide a description of the s'oil profile at the subject site. Field Investigation The field investigation consisted of three borings located in a triangular shape around Bor'ing A. The borings were terminated at forty-one (41.0) feet below the existing ground surface. Each boring drilled was advanced utilizing an eight inch hollow-stem auger. During advancement of the borings, soil samples were obtained at 15' , 20', 30' and 40' below ground surface. Each soil sample retrieved, was examined on site by our geologist. -De.sc~i pti on of soil samples and earth materials enc'ountered during the drilling process are included on the boring logs (Plates 1, 2 and 3, attached). , · Opon completion of the soil description, each so.il sample was placed in a clean glass jar, sealed and appropriately ,labeled by our geologist. These samples were stored on ice and delivered to B.C. Laboratories at the end of'the drilling operations. Decontamination of the sampling device was performed between each sample drive and each boring, which consisted of a soap and water sOlution scrub and .double- rinse with clean water. Decontamination of the drilling equipment was performed by a ' steam cleaner at the site. 2901 H STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 · PHONE (805) 327-7065 Union. Cemet e.r.y 700 Poto. mac. Avenue Bakersfield, cA. SOILS ENGINEERING', INC. File 86-4981 January 19, 1987 Page 2 Laboratory Analysis As stated above, al.1 retrieved samples were placed o.n ice and delivered directly to B.C. Laboratories for .analysis. The laboratory tests consisted of BTX (Benzene, Toluene, Xylene) and T.V.H. ~(Total Volatile Hydrocarbons). Test results are attached for your. review. Results Earth. material 'encountered consisted of. interbedded layers of yellowish brown, fine to medium claye'y sand; yellowish brown and oli'.ve, fine to coarse, silty sand; yellowish brown well graded sand with occasi'onal layers of olive sandy clay and clayey silt. Samples B-1 at 15', 30' and hO' and B-3 at 20' showed detection of hydrocarbo'ns with levels of T.V.H. ranging from .202 ppm to 4546 ppm. T~he soils encountered in' Boring I and Boring~ A are contaminated to a depth of 40', while the surrounding boring B-3, 2nd. hole and Boring B are contaminated to a depth of approximately 20'. Based on 'there test results, we have drawn an approximate area of the plume of contamination at the site (see' Site Plan). Depth to groundwater at the subject property is greater than 150' according to Water Supply Report 1985, by the Kern County Water Agency, dated May 1986. Conclusion According to our discussion with the Health Department, air stripping of the soils is not acceptable as a clean up operation. A different system has to be defined for the contaminated site to minimize the concentration of the hydrocarbons' in the soil. The design of the system is beyond our scope'of work. If we can be.of .any help regarding the next stage please feel free to call us. Respectfully submitt~,. ~" ' . . F N4¥~X,,,~. ~,,~,t,~,%i\~~ B-2 BORINGS BY B.C~LAB -~ BORINGS BY S.E.I. UNION CEMETERY Z3(~ z~~ · DA~'E D.,LLED: ~FEST BORING LOG ~ Job ,o. 8~-4~s~ lz/9/~0 ' _ INC. PI Of % DENSITY %FIhES FRI~r'Ic~ DEPTH SAMPL~ SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION VOIST. PCF (-~ZOO) ANGLE GROUP 0'-7': CLAYEY S,~%~}: yellowish brow~, ' -- SC moist, fin'~ to med. grained, -- moderate odor 7'-14" SAND' dark gray, moist, fine - to coarse grained, clean, -- S7~ moderate odor - 15' jar :14'-17': CLAYEY SILT: olive, moist, I. ~{L plastic, moderate odor _ 17,-35,: SILTY SANq}: yellowish br.o~m, _ SM slightly moist, fine to med. 20* jar sand fraction, moderate odor 50'*' jar moderate odor ELEVATION: LOCATION: See S~te ?lan LOGGED BY: D.T. 8" l*lol]ow-stem .Auger EQUIPMENT:- - SO~LS ENGINEERING DAVE DR"L~D: ~EST BORING LOG ~ Job NO.86-49Sl 12/9/S6 DATE REPORTED: ,1/17./87 No. 1 SOILS ,ENGINEERING · ~ Of ' ' 0/0 DENSITY %FI~ES FRICTION DEPTH ,SAMPI.~ SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF {-~ZO0) ANGLE GROUP 35 35'-41': SAN~3: gray, slightly moist, , -- SW f~ne to coarse grained, clea~ _ moderate odor --40 m~derate oSor - Drilling Terminated at 41'; No ground- - water encountered _ 45 LOCATION: See Site Plan ELEVATION: LOGGED BY: D.T. EQUIPMENT' g" Hollow-stem Auger D*TE DRILLED: ~)TEST BORING LOGW'~ aOb No. ~¢~-4~.~s~ 12/10/86 DA?E REPOR?ED: 1/17/87 NO, 2 SOILS ENGINEERING INC. Pa Of % DENSITY '%FIhES FRICTION DEPTH SAMPLES SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF (~ZO0) ANGLE GROUP O, -7½'; CLAYEY S,&'~q3: .yellowish broom - SC moist, fine to med. grained, -- no odor -- -- 7~' -14': 'SAND: yellowish brown, slight - -- Sgq ly moist, fine to coarse ] 0 grained, clean,'no odor - olive, strong odor -- L4,_19~2,- SkNU~ CLAY: olive, moist, "~ __ 15~ jar fine to medium sand fraction,1 _ silty, strong odor 20: jar 19%,-24,. SILTY SANq3: olive, moist, _ fine to medium sand fraction strong odor, lens of clay at 20~-.~' 25 LOCATION: See Site Plan ,.ELEVATION: LOGGED'BY: D.T. EQUIPMENT~ 8'' Hollow-stem Auger ,. lOlLS ENGINEERING D'ATE DRILLED: 12/10/86 BORING LOG Job No. g6-49Sl % DENS)TY %FIbErS FRICTION DEPTH ~'VlPI. EE SO)L SO)L DESCRIPTION ~OIS"F. PCF (-~200) ANGLE GROUP 25 24,-29': S~\~}: yellowish brown, slighlLlv .-- SW moist, fine to coarse graine( , -- moderate odor 30'* jar' ~.9'-39': SILTY SAN13: yellowish broom, SM slightly moist, fine to med -- sand fraction, trace of odor 40* jar ~9'-41" SAN~3: light gray, slightly SP moist, fine to med grained, L-~ -~_ clean' trace of odor - Terminated at 41'; No groundg~ater - encountered LOCATION: See Site Plan ELEVATION: LOGGED BY: P.T. EQUIPMENT'- g" Ho] low-stem Auger,, _ 1/1.7/87 No. z SOILS ENGINEERING INC. P~ ~e Of ,T-OR,LL'O:' . TEST BORING LOG aOb, NO-s -49Sl I2/10/80 R,PORTeD: 1/17/87 No. -' SOILS ENGINEERING INC. % DENSITY DEPTH 5AMPt.ES SOIL. SOIL DESCRIPTION MmST. PCF P~,ZOO) ANGLE GROUP _ ~)'-4': CLAYE¥ SAND- yellowish brmm. SC moist, £±ne to med. grained, no odor ~-- '-O': SILTY S~LN]3: reddish broom, 5' SM moist, fine to medium sand fraction~ no odor' - ~ ,~'. 7k': CLAYEY SAND: reddish bm, mo]sT/ -XX fine to med. grained, no odo~ / 10 SC. '½,-13~-~,- CLArifY S.adJD: gray, moist, firie, to coarse grained, strong odcr - ~.{L L3~'-16': CLAYEY SILT: olive, moist,. 15' jar strong gasoline odor .6'-23': SILTY SAN~J: olive, moist, fine -- SM sand fraction, strong gasolir~e -- odor 20* jar _ S~{ !3'-28" SAND' yellowish brown, sl~ghlly 25 moist, fine to med~ grained, , clean, strong gasoline odor ELEVATION: LOCATION: See Site Plan' ,,, LOGGED BY: D.T. EQUIPMENT: IIollow-stem' Auger I'' ~OILS ENGIN,ERING .DATE DR,,.,.ED: '[ST BORING LOG aob NO.86_4981' DATE REPORTED: 1/17/87 NO'. 3 .. .SOII..S ENGINEERING INC. P~ Of e,/o DENSITY %FIl~$ FRIC"~ON DEPTH SAMP~ SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF- t..~ZOO)'~,NGLE GROUP 30 SM 28'-35': SILTY S.~\~): olive, slightly _ moist, fine to coarse sand fraction, well graded, -- moderate gasoline odor 35. -- SW 35'-41': SAN~): gray, slightly moist, fine to medium grained, clea~ , strong odor 40 · ~ Drilling Terminated at 41' - No groundwater encountered LOCA?ION: See Site Plan £/~¥~TlON: LOGGED BY': L).'i. 8" )tollow-stem Auger EQUIPMENT;- ~oms . b. LABORA"F.O..RIES INC. ' J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHi . i G PE TRO L EUI~ '- MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4~* Pur'geable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 2901 "H" S~. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 DAVID TORII Sample Description: ~498! B-! @15' Date of REPORT:12-22-86 LAB No.:22q37 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 12-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-E0-86 CoDstituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-X¥1ene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyi TVH Benzene ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results E.33 '8.5I 3.26 4.55 10.15 7.79. 0.96 202.00 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS By ASRA~JL ~ J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. 'E G . ~TROL~UM ~AIN OVVIGE: 4100 PIERGE ~AD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. g3308 PHONE 327-4~ ~ Purgeable Aromatics SOILS E~GINEERING ATTN: DAVID ~ORII Date of 2901 "H" ST. REPORT:12-~2-86 BAKERSFIELD, CA. '93301 LAB No.:22A38 Sample Description: ~A981 B-1 @30' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 12-!8-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g .ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results. 82.38 356..87 116.98 15B.Sq 350.90 · 219.63 19.05 A5A6.?6 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 1~-~0-~6 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 O.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS By J. J. [GilN, lEG. CHEM [NGI, P~T~OLEU~ ~ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4~ SOILS ENGINEERING BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301 . % Sample Description: ~A981 Puroeable Aromatics ATTN: DAVID TORII B-E @15' Date of' REPORT:12-22-66 LAB No.:22q39 DATE/TiME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-S6 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED ~r LAB: 12-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS 12-20-86 Const i tuent Reporting U6its Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-X¥1ene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 50E0/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS Analyses Results none none none none none no~e none none detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 . LABORAT. RIIN(]. t~TIIgLLrLI¥ _~~~~-' J J EG.~ ,,to c ~ t MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-49! Pur~eable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: .DAVID TORIi Date of 2901 "H" ST,. REPORT:12-22-86 BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301' LAB No.:22440 Sample Description: ~k981 B-E @30' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED $ LAB: 12-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 1E-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene IsOpropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g Og/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH By. Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 .0.1 0.1 0.5 By ' A$~IC'TIL TURE ,. LABORATOR.IES'-- INC. J. J. EGLIN, IIEG. CHEM. ENGll. PETIIOLEUJ( ~ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4~ Purgeabte Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 290i "H" ST. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 DAVID TORII Sample Description: ~A981 B-3 820' Date of REPORT:12-22-86 LAB No.:2~ql DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLEC'TED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED 8 LAB: 12-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 10.95 62.15 31.09 A6.65 103.66 91.91 13.73 3227.93 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1' 0.1 0i5 Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 SOILS ENGINEERING 8901 "H" ST. BAKERSSFIELD, CA. Purgeable Aromatics ATTN: DAVID TORII Date of REPORT:12-~2-86 93301 LAB No.:E2442 Sample Description: ~4981 B-3 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TI~E SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 12. i8-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 1E-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-X¥1ene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g' ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA ,5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL.DRY MATTER BASIS .Analyses Results ~one none no~e ~one ~o~e none no~e detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 PETIfOLEU~I ~ ...... MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 32?-49' SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 8901 "H" ST. BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301 Sample Description: ~4981 B-3 Purgeable Aromatics DAVID TORII @qO ' Date of REPORT:12-22-86 LAB No.:22Aq3 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ ~AB: 12-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylehe Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS .Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level O.i 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5' By SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. March 23, 1987 Department of Public Health Division of En, vironmental Health 1700 FloWer Bakersfield, California 93305 Attent i on: Bill Scheide Subject: PROPOSAL: Additional Field Investigation and Labo.rato~y Testing for Contaminated Soil at Union Cemetery Site 700~Potomac Avenue Bakersfield~ California Gentlemen: In accordance with our meeti'ng on March .20, 1987, we are providing the following a proposal for additional field work and laboratory testing at the subject site. '~Ou~r scope of work will be to determine the plume of contamination, based on the additional borings and laboratory testing. Field Investigation ~ Our field investigation will consist of four (4) borings loca.ted around B-1 /see site Plan). The borings will' be terminated' 'at fifty (50) feet below existing ground surface and.will be advanced utilizing an eight (8.0) inch hollow stem auger. During advancement .of the borings, soil samples will be obtained at approximately five (5.0) foot intervals, initiated at 'fifteen (15) feet below existing ground .surface. Each soil sample retained will be examined by our geologist or engineer on-si,te. Samples will be evaluated for the pres.ence of volatile organic compounds.with the use ofhn~u- photoionization meter. Results of this examination, as well as visual description of each sample will be 'included on our boring logs. Upon completion of the evalUation, each soil sample will ~be placed into a clean glass jar, sealed and appropriately labeled and stored on ice, until delivery to the laboratory. During the project, all samples will be in.the direct custody of our representative who will be ,responsible for delivering these samples to the laboratory at the completion of the project. 2901 H STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 · PHONE (805) 327-7065 Proposal . Union Cemetery Bakersfield, CA. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. File 86-4981 March 23, 198.7 Page 2 Decontamination of the sampling device will be performed between each sample drive and between each boring. 'Laboratory An'alysis Selected samples retrieved from the drilling operation will be taken to the laboratory for analysis to determine the extent of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination.~ Upon completion of our field..investigation and laboratory analysis, a report will be issued to determine if the available data is sufficient to locate the vertical and lateral extent of soil contami n ati on at t he facility. If the plume of contamination could be located from the available data, a Phase II (which is beyond the scope of this proposal) discussing the mitigation measures at the subject site has to be initiated. If you have an~s regarding this proposal please feel free to call~~.~ Re spect ful 1 - ~. ~V~,, ...~.z, ~. '~-" ~ ' ~?'L.~: A TG Cornp~ny March 7, 1990 · Ms. Dolores Gough Kern County Department of Environmental' Health · · ;.;.'~ii~:'~' 2700 M Street, Suite 300 . .I~I;. "~..,.,~ ;~;.~:;I).~.i'~vi.i-i~ii~ . . ~ letter ~ to confi~ ~ o~ .coaversa~oa of today d~g w~ch we ~sed clos~e of ~e U~on Cemete~ proje~2 1. Accor~ng to the Kern ~ounV Water Agent, depth to ~o~dwater is at le~t ~00 feet. ~e ~eat tO ~o~dwater ~ ~ere~ore ne~ble at t~;~ site. Z ~e cont~m~ have namr~y attenuated over ~e co~e of ' to a ~a~on of ~fi~ concen~afio~. Page 2 of ~ome En~nment~'s December 1, 1989 Repo~ of F~d~gs (enclosed) s, mm~es the · ~ attenuation. ~ September, 1986 the highest ~H concen~a6on w~ 18,900 ppm. ~ic~ resul~ ~om J~u~, 1987 ~ted 4,5~ ppm ~H.. Field a~fies conduced by ~ome ~ O~ober, 1989 ~cate ~at ~H concentratio~ have been reduced to a m~mum of 1,2~ pp~ The closure in place poses no threat to the public because there is no mechanism to cause mobilization of the contaminants and thus no potential for public exposure. Upon receiving County approval for closure and obtaining permits to abandon, the vapor extraction wells will be filled from bottom to top with cement grout. A concrete slab will be poured to cover approximately 250 square feet. This will prevent the i~filtration of any precipitation or irrigation water. · 3/90 3E-103Z008 4570 California Avenue,.Suite 200 · Baker.sfield, California 93309 · (805) 326-0492 "Treatment by Design~' -'.: i.': ~Thorne Environmental is appreciative of the knowledgeable and responsible way the County has'approached this problem. If we can an.~wer any questions or be of further service please contact ,us at: 326-0492. Enclosures Manager"!. 3/90 3F.,-1032.008 I"1 ON THORNE ENV I RONMENTAL I NC ENVIRONMENTAL A TG Company P. 0 i THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Telephone 805/326.0492 1.800/?$3-0492 FaX 805/326.0498 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER DATE: TO.' COMPANY: FROM:' RE: NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: .... ~ COMMENTS: PLEASE CALL () URGENT ( ) REPLY-NOT NECESSARY ( ) 4570 Catifornia Avenue, Suite 200, Bakersfield, California 93309. (805) 326-0492 "Treatment by Design" MON THORNE E N '¢ I R 0 N I"IE N T I:::l L. a?QO M 81rNt, 8ulle ?.1'8 Bikemfleld, GA g3,105 Telephone (COS) Teteu~l,r (COS) i~i~ N T A G E N C Y V . DISTRICT. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF GASOLINE CONTAMINATED SOIL AIR STRIPPING OPERATION AT UNION CEMETERY State law requires notification of all parents of chtldren attending a school located within 1000 feet, and all residents · located wtthtn 750 feet, of proposed sources of air con,eminent ~'" emissions prior to approval of such construction. The purpose of this not.~ce ts' ~o inform YOu that Un,on Cemetery, located w~th~n 1000 feet of Bessie Owens School, ~s proposing to contract with Thorne Env~romen~al to instal3 and operate, on a temporary bas~s, vacuum system to extract organic vapors from gasoline contaminated so~1. The vacuum ~ystem conS{ets o~ underground va~or ex~ract~on wells, subsurface, and surface piping,' vacuum blower, and a reciprocating .Piston tnternal combustion engine designed to burn =he extracted gasoline vapors, Comments regarding this project wtll be received by the Kern County A~r Po]]ut~on Control D~strict untO] April 18, 1990 and w~]l be considered pr~°r to taking f~nal action on the pro,osco ~roject. The application fo~ Authority. to ¢o.nstruct~ support documents, and the D~str~ct's analys~s of ~he a~r quality ~mpaot of th~s pro~ect are available for inspection at the Kern County A~ Pollution Contro] D~str~ct off,ce ]ocated at 2700 "M" St., ate. Z75, Bakersfield, California, ~3301, [elephone number 861-3682. GARY*J. WICKS Agency Director (805) 861-3502 ' STEVE McCALLEY Director RESOURCE i E N.T DEPART,i! !'.~iMENTAL March !4, 1990. 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopler (805) 861-3429 AGENCY Frank Dobesh Union Cemetery Association P. O. Box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93305 Subject: Underground Tank Site Investigation Union Cemetery, 700 Potomac Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Permit #: 210004 , Dear Mr. Dobesh: In reviewing Thorne Environmental's letter and "Report of Findings" and all the i~formation provided/discussed in our March 7, 1990, meeting regarding the subject site, this Department approves of the "closure in place" (no action) option to mitigate the Contamination at this site. This option will include paving the area with an impermeable material such as concrete. Please be'aware that approval of the.no action option is based on current regulatory requirements and may not exempt you from future liability. . Should you decide to proceed with this option, a permit from this Department must be obtained prior to abandoning theVEwells. Also, please notify this office when the paving.has been completed. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861- 3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cas cc: Barbara Minette, Thorne Environmental \210004.1tr GARY J. WICKS Agency Director (805) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY Director 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopler (805) 861-3429 AGENCY September 7, 1989 Thorne Environmental 4570 California Avenue, Suite 200 Bakersfield, CA 93309 ATTN: Barbara Minette SUBJECT: Union Cemetery, 700 Potomoc, Bakersfield, California PERMIT # 210004 Dear Ms. Minette: In reviewing your response to the additional requirements On the site characterization and remediation for the subject site, the following are our comments: 1. The rationale ~ choosing "I00 ppm TPH" clean-up level must be provided. Piea~e specify if that concentration zs the average) or cumuzative value. For a orooosed acceptable, it must be demonstrated that~~,ndt _~bse a threat to public health and the environment.'- Regarding ~he extraction rate and time calculations, the. "100" is the average molecular weight of gasoline which can have the units of lb/mole' Tk must be adjusted to operating pres Since the calculated extraction r; approximate values, recalculation a difference, therefore it is this information. We nOted an error in the mathemat influence ~s In re/rw = x re = r~x not Calculating; the radius (re) is not 48 feet. Please resubmit the correct calculations when you apply for the vapor extraction well permit. Thorne Environmental Page Two September ?, 1989 Item5 #1^ must be resolved before implementation of the workplan. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 861- 3636. Sincerely, Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Frank Dobesh, Union Cemetery A TG Company September 28, 1989 Dolores Gough Kern County Dept. of Environmental Health Services 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Permit #210004 -. Dear Ms. Gough: :~. · This letter is in response 'to your correspondence dated September 7, 1989 requesting clarification of statements made in our workplam Below is a guideline for the determination of the presence of human and environmental risk resulting from activities at Union Cemetery. Risk is expressed in the Hazard Ranking System, the model used to select Superfund sites, as: Risk= Hazard x Release x Exposure x Target "If any componem or event is missing, there is no risk. Risk assessmem, therefore, is a mean.~ of estimat/ng the probability that constituents of a waste released from a facility will cause specific adverse effects to public health or the environmem". (Municipal and Industrial Waste, conference proceedings). Targets are known to exist as humans or ground water (em&onmem~ risk). Exposure is expected fi: a) portions of the site are left uncovered (not applicable in this case); b) contaminants migrate to the ground water and are eventually comumed in drinking water (not likely as groundwater is approximatel~eet deep according to the "Water Supply Report", Kern County Water Agency, May,-1-9gS); or c) vapor phase contaminants are inhaled or absorbed (also not applicable in this case. Major releases of hazardous material (gasoline) have occurred at the site but are limited in areal extent and concentration. Based on this review, therefore, it is unlikely that risk is present at the 'facility. The site characteristics present at this facility produce a score of 48 points using the LUFT Manual leaching potential analysis for gasoline using TPH and BTXE (see attached). The LUFT recommended "not to exceed" concentration of TPH for this score is 100 ppm. 4570 California Avenue, Suite 200 · Bakersfield, California 93309 · (805) 326-0492 "Treatment by Design" The. calculation of radius of influence is shoxvn below and uses the approved equation you supplied to me. It has been submitted along with the well permit application. 703 k h (Ap)2 u T Z (In r~/r2) 703 k= Ap= Constant Flow rate = 57,600 cu'bic ftdday Perm~ability(vapor) = 10 darcies Slotted screen length = 35 feet change in pressure = 2 psi u = v~scosity of gas = 0.006 c~.t,poise ~" 1' ~'d T = Temperature Rankine = 60" F + 460 = 520 Z = Compressibility of an Ideal gas = I r~ = Effective radius r2 = well radlus = 0.167 leer Solving the above Equation for r~ we have: 703 kh In rl/r=- q uT Z 703 kh (Ap)2.. r~=r2 (e quTZ ) = (0.167) e · 703 (10)(35)(2)= .. 57,600 (0.006) (520) (1) = (0.167)e 5.48 = 39.92 feet t'r~ /4v0 X 0,0733' If you have any further questions please contact me at .326-0492. Sincerely, Thorne Environmental Barbara Minette Project Hydrogeologist. UNION LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS FOR GASOLINE USING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) AND BENZENE, TOLUENE, XYLENE AND ETHYLBENZENE (BTX&E) S SCORE S SCORE S SCORE SITE C 10 PTS. C 9 PTS. C 5 PTS.. FEATURE O IF CON- O IF CON- O IF CONi R D1TION R DITION R DITION E IS IV[ET E IS MET E IS MET Minimum Depth to '"~ . Ground Water from the Soil Sample (feet) - -~. 'Fractures in subsurface 10 None Unknown Present (applies to foothills or mountain areas) Average Annual ~0 < 10 10-25 2640\2 Precipitation (inches) Man-made conduits which None .9 Unknown Present increase vertical migration of leachate 'Unique site features: None 9 At least More than recharge area, coarse one · · one soil, nearby wells, etc. COLUMN TOTALS 30 + -,~s + = RANGE TOTAL PTS. 49 pts. or more 41 - 48 pts. '40 pts. or less MAX. ALLOWABLE 1/50/50/50 .3/.3/1/1/ NA\3_ BTX~ I.EVELS (PPM) MAX. AI J.OWABLE 1000 4:100 10 TPH LEVELS (rPM) \z \3 If depth is greater than 5 ft. and less than 25 ft., score 0 points. If depth is 5 ft. or less, this table should not be used. If precipitation is over 40 inches, score 0 points. Levels for BTX&E are not applicable at a TPH concentration of 100 ppm. A TG Company August 18, 1989 Dolores Gough Department of Enviromnental Health Services 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Union Cemetery Project Permit # 210004 ~N'~IRONM~NTAL HEALTH Dear Dolores: This letter is in reply to your letter of August 3 requesting additional information on the above project. 1. 'The first sample depth will be at 5 feet. ao The indicator chemical (contaminant), is petroleum fuel hydrocarbons as gasoline along with associated benzene, toluene, ~lenes and et~hyl- The proposed clean-up level is 100(j.~ ~l~as gasoline and 0.3 ppb benzene. This will be verified by a--dvaW~ng confirmation borings and collecting samples until the target clean-up levels are achieved. Vapor will be monitored daily with a photo-ionization detector for the first 2 weeks; bi-weekly after that, including both inlet and outlet. Tedlar bag samples will be collected initially and after 3 months, and sent to Med-Tox Associates (a California State Certified Lab) for analysis. Because of the small areal extent of the site (approximately 15 feet by 11 feet) one vapor extraction well is justified. A contour map showing concentrations of TPH and BTXE as well as cross-sections showing the same are contained in the workplan. When 18 data points were averaged, 5,356 ppm was obtained as the average concentration of TPH. Volume of affected soil = 1.ength x width x depth. = 15 feet x 11 feet x 50 feet = 8,250 cubic feet Weight of soil = 110 pounds/cubic foot (average) x 8,250 cubic feet = 907,500 pounds 4570 California Avenue, Suite 200 · Bakersfield, California 93309.- (805) 326-0492 "Treatment by Design." Amount of contaminant = 907,500. pounds x 5.356 ppm 1,000,000 = 4,960.57 pounds 4720 gallons Extraction rate = 40 $CFM x 60 minutes x 5,356 ppm x 100 359 x 1,000,000 = 3.58 pounds/hour =(0.53 gallons/hour~ Extraction time = 4~860.57 pounds = -56 days . -. : 3.58 pounds/hour ~' ~' airflow rate = 40 SCFM . average specific gravity of gasohne; i00 molar volume of gas = 359 ~ ~ ~ The attached graph plotting cumulative hydrocarbon recovery in pounds vs. time shows that approximately 80% of the contaminant will have been removed after 60 days. The extraction curve is steep initially but levels off. The remaining 20% will be extracted over the next 60 days. We feel that most of the contaminant will have been extracted by the end of 120 days. However, operations will continue until our target levels are confh'med by laboratory analysis. The radius of influence of the vapor extraction well may be found through the use of the equation: q = .k 21'r p )= Flow Rate (SCF/day) = Relative Permeability (Darcies) h = Net Thickness (Feet)' /'{ = Viscosi~ of Gas (Centipoise) /xp = Change in Pressure (PSI) r~ = F__.xternal Boundary Radius (Feet) rw = Well Radius (Feet) Solving the above equ~rio~ for P= rw = 2 inches ' 0.167 feet re Where X = - k 2 TV &q 40 SCFM = 57,600 SCF/day 0.3 darcy thickness of screened interval = 35 feet 0.006 centipoise ,, .. 2Tvh q h Solving for x: /',,,,p x=-k ~2~r) h ~q = -0.3 (27r) 35 (11.3) = -2.16 0.006 (57,600) x = -2.16 radius c~f influence x -2.16 = 're = (rw) = (0.167) 48 feet Site-specific soil properties to be determined include soil classification and grain size only. Porosity, permeability and average weight of soil have been estimated using values from similar soils. 5,000 _ 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 UNION CEMETERY I I ~ I 30 60 90 120 time (days) I hope this answers all of the questions you had regarding this project. more comments or questions please contact me at 326-0492. Sincerely, Barbara Minette Project Hydrogeologist If you have any GARY 'J. WI~KS Agency Director (805) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY Director 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopler (805) 861-3429 AGENCY August 3, 1989 Union Cemetery A.ssociafion P.O. Box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93305 .Attention: Mx. Frank Dobesh Subject: Workplan for Site Characterization and ~., Union Cemetery 700 Potomac Ave. Bakersfield (Permit # 210004) Dear Mr. Dobesh: This Department has reviewed the subject workplan prepared by Thorne Environmental Tiffs Department requires that the following items be addressed/claxifled: · 1. On the proposed borings, at what depth will the first sample be collected? Regarding t. ke vapor extraction system: a. What is the 'indicator ~emie. al that will be u~ed in det~l~' tld~tltla~ of clean-up? b. What .is the proposed dean-up level and how will it be vexifled? c. The details of vapor monitoring must be included in the workplam The rationale of the location and number of extraction rwe]].q needs clarification. The zone of influenc:~ at each well must be included. A contour of the indicator chemical concentrati,~n at various zones initially and at the projected completion lime must also be p,.~Mded. On page 8, 3rd parag-raph it states that "The combined vapors --, the exkaust is passed through a ca.~alytic converter to insure complete combustion." The catalytic convex"..:r is to reduce emissions from incomplete combustion. Will site-specific soft ,roperfies such as moisture content, p~rosity and particle size 'distribution be dete~ .&ned? U~ion Cemetery Association July 26, 1989 Page 2 The above information mustbe submitted to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, / Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials SPecialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:cd . . cc: Barbara Minette, Thorne EP~vironmental dolores\unioncem.let 2700 "M" street, Suile 300 Bakersfield, CA. 93301" (8O5) 861.3636. (805) 861-.3429 Fnx Number COUNTY OF KERN ~ironmental Health Services Depart June 20, 1989 Mr. Frank Dobesh Union Cemetery P.O. Box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93305 Subject: Location: 700 Potomac Avenue Known As: Union Cemetery PERMIT #: 210004 (A-262-21) Dear Mr. Dobesh: The intent of this letter is fo inform you of the necessary deadlines for work required at the property described above. As a responsible party for a leaking underground storage tank, you have previously received a letter from 'this Depa~nent notifying you of the required work necessary to identify the extent/and mitigate the contamination. We are now requesting that this work, outlined in UT-35, be done in a timely manner. Our records show that the site characterization phase of the investigation at this site has been completed. The remediation alternative must therefore be 'chosen and an implementation plan be submitted to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. The plan must be approved by this Department prior to initiating any work. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me. at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, DG:cd dolores\dobesh.let 6-16'7 Dolores Gough Hazardous Materials Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program 2?00 '~' ~cree~.'~e. 300 (805) 861-~,-' Ed~v',-romo, enta.]. Hee. ith Depa,r~ent C.O.L.T- LOCAL OPTION 'ebruary 14, 1989 Mr. Frank Dobesh Union Cemetery Assn. P.O. box 3066 Bakersfield. CA 93385' SUBJECT: Loc;lion: ?00 Potomac Bakersfield, CA 93307 Known As: Union Cemetery PERMIT ~: 210004 Dear Mr. Frank' Oobesh: This letter'is an official notice to inform you, a responsible party~for the above described .site. of your options for oversight cost recovery. As previously notified, you are a responsible party for a site determined to have an unau{horized release of hazardous materials from an underground storage tank and are required to provide for all studies and work relating to the above described property; see attachment "A". The costs incurred by Kern County Environmental Health for the oyersight of the work for the site characterization: feasibility study, remediation action plan, site remediation, and ongoing monitoring is not covered by any fees or permits~ These costs are recovered by Kern County Environmental Health in one of the two ways described below. It is y6ur responsibility to select the method of oversight cos~ recovery Under the terms of the (A) State contract or (B) County of Kern Local Agreement Option. These option~ ONLY pertain to current and future costs associated with oversight, and you will not be "back-billed" or retroactively charged for previous oversight costs. (A) ~TAT~ COHTII~C? The State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program. provides a mechanism for the State to reimburse the County for County oversight. The County will conduct the necessary oversight and bill the State Water Resources Control Board under this State contract. The State will then charge you. a responsible party for both the costs incurred by the County and the State pertaining to your site. (B) COUNTYLOCAL AGREEN]iNT Kern County Environmental Health is providing this option for those who prefer to pay the County directly and avbid the addition of State costs. Prior to the County's performance of services., this option requires your deposi~ of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) with the County to be held in the Local Option Trust Account. Charges for County oversight are made against this account. In this option, a responsible party must enter into a County agreement, attachment ~'To safeguard the environment, the environmental sensitivity (Attachment "C") of this site has been reviewed by Environmental Health to determine the potential threat for groundwater contamination. Only sites determined to be non- environmentally sensitive may enroll in the Local Option Agreement. The site described above is not in an environmentally sensitive area and may be enrolled in the Local Option Agreement; however, the County of Kern reserves the right to cancel any Local Option Agreement, should it be discovered that groundwater contamination or a unique, complex hydrogeological condition exists. In such cases, Environmental Health will utilize the State contract to pay for County oversight activities. The County of Kern reserves this right for any site even when the site is located in a non-environmentally sensitive area. It isnecessary for you to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this letter to advise Kern County Environmental Health of your choice: either the'State Contract or the County's Local Agreement option. If you select the County's Local Agreement, please sign the Local Agreement, enclosure "B", and return it with your check for $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) made payable to the County of Kern, addressed to Kern County Environmental Health 2700 M Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield. CA 93801. Attention: Underground Storage Tank Contract Administratdr. If you select the State Contract, please indicate that you have made this selection and that you have read Attachment "D", the official notification, in a letter sent to the address indicated above. Failure to respond in-writing t° this notice within ten (10) calendar days will automatically result in oversight cost recovery for your site(s) to be placed under the terms~of the State Pilot Program for Leaking Underground'Storage Tanks. Attachment "D' will then serve as the official notification of your enrollment into the State Pilot Program for Underground Storage Tanks. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John NIlon. contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative Officer Environmental Health attachments · .,e. 300 (805~ 861-~636 " KERN C O UNT ,~vl~or~entaJ. He. CA Depm'~ment ATTACHMENT "D" February 14. 1989 Mr. Frank D°besh Union Cemetery Assn. P.O..box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93385 SUBJECT: Location: 700 Potomac Bakersfield, CA 93307 Known As: Union Cemetery PERMIT #': 2~0004 Dear Mr. Frank Dobesh: This letter will serve as the' official notification· concerning reimbursement requirements for a responsible party enrolled in the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program. As mentioned in the introduCtory le(ter, by either not responding to this package within ten (10) calendar days or through your own selection of the State Contract option, your site will be placed under the terms explained below: Whereas the Legislature has appropriated funds from the California Hazardous Substance Clean-up Fund to pay the local and state agency· administrative and oversight costs associated with the cleanup of releases from underground storage tanks; and Whereas the direct and indirect costs of overseeing removal or remedial action at the above site are funded, in whole or in part, from the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund; and Whereas the above individual(s) oF entity(les) have been tdenti{ied as the party or parties responsible for investigation and cleanup'of the above site; YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that pursuant to S~ction 25360 of the Health and Safety code, the Above Responsible Party or Parties shall reimburse the State Water Resources Control Board for all direct and indirect costs incurred bY any and all state and local agencies while overseeing the cleanup of the above underground storage tank site. and the above Responsible Party or Parties shall make full payment of such costs within 30 days of receipt *of a detailed invoice from the State Water Resources Control Board. If you Should have any questions regarding this matter, Please contact John Nilon, contract manager, at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Mary Weddell Assistant County Administrative Officer Environmental Health DIS"f?IICT OF~CES DATE DEPOSIT NO. ~ ~FFIDAVIT AND RECORD (~F DEPOSIT SEC. 26900-26902 GOV. CODE ' DEPT, " 4113 000 TIlE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER (SF KERN COUNTY, HERESY CERTIFIES THAT'THE AMOUNT DUE THE TREASURY OF SAID COUNTY FOR MONEYS COLLECTED'BY ENVIRONP~NTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF KERN · ts THE SUM OF C)N~ q'T4C~TT.~AN~ ~n~ QO/1QQ DOLLARS ($ 1,000~00 ) IN SETTLEMENT OF THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS. '1 ! I PROJECT FUND ' DESCRIPTION OF DEPOSIT i I~UND DEPT. DiV. REVENUE [ AMOUNT ! NO. NO. NO. CODE (OPTIONAL) ' TOTAL '~ocal Option Tru'st 12[ & & ~ & & ' ?~067 A] 13 5730 1.000.00' 1,000. O0 2olt Program 1121 & & & a & gnion Cemetery Associat:.~l &' Permit # 210004-4789 ]12! & & & & & ]]21 & & & & & J , I SECTION 26901 GOVERNMENT CODE ] HEREBY SWEAR THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THE KERN COUNTY TREASURER TO AND INCLUDING THE 21 ~ DAY OF April Betty A. Marion,· Account Clerk III THE COUNTY TREASURER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THE DEPOSIT DESCRIBED ABOVE. j989 TOTAL DEPOSIT 006 iS 1,000.00 · ORIG- 1ST COPY 2ND COPY. 3RD COPY' 4TH COPY COPY DISTRIBUTION WHITE TREASURER'S AUTHORIZATION WHITE AUOICONTR. AFFIDAVIT PINK AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-ALPHA G'ROD · DEPOSITING DEPT,-RECEIPT GREEN DEPARTMENT - MEMO RECEIPT IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED OF THE DEPOSIT DESCRIBED ABOVE. BY DEPUTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER DATE BY· DEPUTY COUNTY TREASURER 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, California 93305-4198 Telephone (805) 861-3621 Frank Dobesh Union Cemetery Assn. P. O. Box 3066 Bakersfield, California 93385 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT' March 30,. 1987 RE: Leak Investigation ~ 700 Potomac Avenue LEON M HEBERTSON, M.D. Director of Public Health Air Pollution Control Officer Dear Mr. Dobesh: This is 'to inform you the site characterization conducted at your Potomac Avenue facility did not adequately define the full extent of gasoline contamination in the soil. At this point, we do not know how far .down or how wide the area is contaminated. It is very important we establish the threat to ground water by this plume of contamination as soon as possible. The department 'requests that you submit a new proposal ko find the complete contamination at this site. The= proposal must be submitted for approval to this .department before any further on-site work is begun. For guidance in drawing up the proposal, the environmental assessment contractor must follow the workplan as described on page 9 of Kern County Health Department handbook #UT-30, "Requirements For Permanent Closure of Underground Hazardous Substance ? Storage Tanks". ' A copy of this handbook is included with 'this letter. You 'have 10 days from the date of this letter to submit the new proposal to this department. Once the proposal is approved, you must be prepared to start the investigation as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to call me at (805). 861- 3636. Sincerely,..,, Bill Scheide Environmental Health Specialist Hazardous Materials Management Program BS:sw EnclosUre cc: Tony Frangie SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Department of Public 'Health Division of Environmental Health 1700 Flower Bake'rsfield, California .93305 Attention: ~ Bill Scheide aa~i Subject:. PRO InvestigationPOSAL: Addition and L Testing for Contamina at Union Cemetery Site 700 Potomac Avenue Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: In' accordance with our meeting .on March 20, 1987, we are providing the following a proposal for additional field.work and .laboratory testing at the subject site. Our scope of work will be bo determine the plume of contamination, based on the additional borings and laboratory testing. Field Investigation Our fieid investigation will consist of four (4) bOrings located around B-1 (see site Plan). The bo.rings will be terminated at fifty (50) feet below existing 'ground surface and will be advanced utilizing an eight (8.0) inch hollow stem auger. During advancement of the borings, soil samples will be obtained at approximately five (5.0) foot intervals, initiated at fifteen (15) feet below existing ground surface. Each soil sample retained will be examined by our geologist or engineer on-site. Samples will be evaluated for the presence of volatile organic compounds with the use ofh~ photoionization meter. Results of this examination, as well as visual description of each sample will be included oh our boring logs. Upon completion of the evaluation, each soil sample will be placed into a clean .glass jar, sealed and appropriatel.y labeled and st6red on ice, until delivery to the laboratory. During the project, all samples wilt' be in the direct custody of our representative who will be responsible for delivering these samples to the laboratory at the completion of the project. 2901 H STREET · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 · PHONE (805) 327-7065 Proposal Union Cemeter~ Bakersfie'ld, CA. 't~OILS ENGINEERING, INC. Fi'le 86-4981 March 23, 1987 Page 2 Decontamination of the s~mpling device 'will be performed between each sample drive and between, each boring. Laboratory, Analysis Selected samples retrieved from the drilling operation will be taken to the laboratory~for analysis tO determine the extent of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Upon completion of our field investigation 'an'd laboratory analysis, a 'report will' be issued to determine .if the available dat'a is sufficient to locate the vertical and lateral extent ~of soil contami nati on at the ,facility. If the plume 'of contamination could be located from .the avail, able data, a ,Phase II. (which is beyond the .scope of this proposal) discussing the mitigation measures at the subject site has to be initiated. If you have any quest.ions regarding this proposal please feel free to call.~ N ) U N ~o ~ cE ~ nm.: ! SOILS ENGINEF-I:~G, INC. I -- - I ZgOI H ST. · SH BAKERSF'~ELD, CA 9330~ (805) 527-?0~§ SOILS ENGINEERed, INC. 2901 H StreeT-' BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 3"27-7065 SHEET NO. ~'~ CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY DATE SCALE INC. ' MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA: 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeab le Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING 8901 H STREET BAKER'SFIELD,. CA, 93301 Date of REPORT:l-2-8? LAB N0.:23262 Sample Description: Bi AT 40' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 18-9-86 Constituent TO 41' 18/9/86 ~4981 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 18-89-86 Reporting Units. Dry Basis Analyses Results DATE ANALYSI. S ' COMPLETED: "~'.~i',;',i.~'''. 18-89-86 'Minimum Reporting Level Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene P-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g 8.09 85.76 87.47 A9.15 115.58 94.53 13.04 4000.11 0,1¸ 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 EPA 5020/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography B'y 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, California 93305 Telephone (805) 861-3636 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Reichard ~arch 18, 1987 Tony Frangie Soils Engineering, Inc. 2901 'H' Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: Site Characterization at Union Cemetery, ?00 Potomac Avenue Dear Mr. Frangie: After careful review of your January 19, 1987 report on the tank abandonment site, this department considers the site characterization deficient for the following reasons: 1. There is no scale on the plume area drawing, nor is the tank's location shown; 2. There is no boring on the east side that indicates you have reached a non-contaminated zone; 3. There is no rationale based on soil conditions, geologic knowledge or site specifics which explain why the plume would take a triangular rather than a circular shape; and 4. The plume's known lateral extent was incorrectly drawn, based on laboratory data previously submitted .(see copy of the drawing of plume area). .These deficiencies make it impossible to accept your estimation of the extent or contamination, or .to render any other conclusions. If you have any additional information or reasoning you can contribute to this site characterization, please send it immediately. Your company's projects- under review by this.department have not demonstrated the ability to present valid conclusions on the extent of contamination or the potential threat to groundwater based on geologic conditions and sound engineering princip.les. DISTRICT OFFICES Delano . Lamont . Lake Isabella Mojave Ridgecrest · Shafter . Taft Site Characterkzation at Union Cemetery February' 20, 1987 Page Two If you can demonstrate these abi}ittes, for the Union Cemetery investigation', we will reconsider, accepting you as qualified for. environmental assessment projects. In the:meantime, we will nq longer accept, new projects from you until the department sees new proof of your ability to do the required assessment and follow the outline we have.provided in our meetings with you. If you Wish to discuss this matter,.'ihe department can arrange a hearing with 'the program manager, Richard Casagrande. Please call me if you wish to do so. . :.~: Bill Scheide Environmental Health Specialist Hazardous ~aterials ~anagement Program BS:aa enclosure cc: Union Cemetery a ~0~ BOR;NGS BY B.C.LAB B.3 310 15 .. lB it-2 BORINGS BY. S.E.I. ~PP Ro.x (t-t ~ TE. C o to T I~. ~ ~ ~t' UNION CEMETERY : i, '. .'I ...}: ..., } ~ ~OILS E NGINEER~G, INC.:.&:' ....... .. ~0~ H $~. · ~ ;~... :- ~ t...';.:,'..~;,;,'. "j-'i;.'. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. January 19, 1987 File 86-4J981 Division of Environmental Health Department of Public Health County of Kern 1700 Flower Street Bakersfield, CA. 93305 Attenti on: Bill Scheide Subject: Investigation of leakage from removed underground storage tank at Union Cemetery 700 Potomac Avenue Bakersfield, California Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have performed a field investigation and laboratory testing program at the subject site. Our scope of work consisted of three borings around Boring A,,~ that had been drilled by B.C. Laborator.ies, 1st.. hole, 2nd. hole, 3rd. hole, Borings A, B, and C, to determine th~~ extent of the lateral contamination and to provide a description of the soil profile at the subject site. Field' Investigation The field investigation consisted of three bOrings located in a triangular shape around Boring A. The borings were terminated at forty-one (41.0) feet below the existing ground Surface. E'ach boring drilled was advanced utilizing an eight inch hollow-stem auger. During advancement of the borings,'soil samples were obtained at 15' 20' 30' and 40' below ground surface Each soil sample re~r'ieved, was examined on site by our geologist. Description of sdit samples and earth materials encountered during the dr.il~ing process are included on the boring logs (Plates 1, 2 ~and 3, attached). ' Upon completion of the soil description, each soil sample was placed in a clean, glass Jar, sealed and appropriately labeled by our geologist. These samples we.re stored on ice and delivered to B.C. Laboratories at the end-of the drilling operations. Decontamination of the sampling device was performed between each sample drive and each' boring, which consisted of a soap and water solution scrub and double rinse .with clean water. Decontamination of the drilling equipment was performed by a steam cleaner at the .site. 2901 H STREET · BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 93301 · PHONE '(805) 327-7065 Union Cemetery 700 Potomac Avenue Bakersfield, CA. SOILS' ENGINEERING, INC. File 86-4981 January 19, 1987 Page 2 Laboratory Analysis As. stated above, all retrieved samples were .placed on ice and delivered directly to B.C. Laboratories for analysi~s. The laboratory tests consisted of BTX (Benzene, Toluene, Xylene) and T.V.H. (Total Volatile Hydrocarbons). Test results are attached for your review. Results Earth material enCountered consisted of interbedded layer's .of yellowish brown, fine to medium clayey sand; .yellowish brown and olive, fine to coarse, silty, sand; yellowish brown well graded sand with occasional layers of olive sandy clay and clayey silt. Sampl'es B-1 at 15', 30' and 40' and B-3 at 20' showed detection of hydrocarbons with levels of T.V.H. ranging from 202 ppm to 4546 ppm. .The soils encountered in Boring I and Boring A are contaminated to a depth of 40', while'.the surrounding boring B-3, -2nd. hole and Boring B are contaminated to a depth of approximately 20'. Based on' there test results, we have drawn an approximate area of the plume of contamination at the site (see Site ~Plan). Depth to groundwater at the subject 'property is greater than' 150' according to Water Supply Report 1985, by the Kern County Water Agency, dated May 1986. Conclusion' According to our discussion with the Health Department, air stripping of the soils is not acceptable as a clean up operation. A different system has to be defined for the contaminated site to minimize the concentration of the 'hydrocarbons in the soil. The design of the system is beyond our scope of work. If we. can be of any help regarding the next stage please feel free to call us. Respectfully s uhmi tt~~ ~ ~.. _ B-3 B-2 BOR-'NGS BY B.C.LAB BORINGS BY S.E.I. B UNION CEMETERy ,A'rE ,'EST BORING LOG adb No.86-4P$1 12/9/86 ' .. DAT£ ~£PORT£D: 1/17/87 ~. 1 · . ~OILS ENGINEERING INC. P~ Of e/e DENSITY °/oFIl'~E:S FRICTION DEPTH S/:d~PL~ SOIL SOIL' DESCRIPTION MOIST, PCF t-~ZOO) ANGLE. GROUP 0 0' -7': CLAYEY SAND:'yellowish broom, -- SC moist, fine to med. grained, . - ~- moderate odor - 7'-14': SAND:.dark gray, moist, fine ' >.' "'. - to coarse grained, clean, .... 15' jar 14'-17': CLAYEY SILT: olive, moist, ~{L plastic, moderate odor - 17'-35': SILTY SAND: yellowis~ brb~m, _ SM slightly moist, fi.ne t° med. 20* jar sand fraction, .moderate odor 25' 30' jar moderate odor LOCATION: See Site Plan ~ELEVATION:LoGGED BY: D.T. IIOIL~ ENGINEERING D^TE DR,'LL,D: ~.~i.'EST BORING LOG ~ Job "0.~0-4a~1 1~_/9/S6. . DATE REPORTED: }/17./s7, No. 1 SOILS ENGINEERING 'INC. . % DENSITY %F'II~E:S~FRICTI DEPTH SAMPI.~ SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION Mols'r. PCF t.~2OO)!AN(:;LE GROUP 35 35'-41': SAND: gray, slightly moist, -- SW fine to coarse grained, clean! .. moderate odor 40 m~derate odor -- Drilling Terminated at 41'; No groQnd~ '. - water encountered ._ - - - - _ ELEVATION: LOCATION: See Site Plan LOGGED BY: D.T. EOUIPMENT~ 8" H~ll?w-stem Auger~ SOILS ENGINEERING ]2/'10/86 ~ DATE REPORTED:'i/17/87 NO. 2 .. . SOILS ENGINEERING INC, Pmge Of ~/~ DENSITY °/oFIINE:S FRICTION OEPTH SAMPI~ SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF (~It200) ANGLE GROUP: (~ .. D,-7½, · CLAYEY SJJ~]): yellowish brown. SC moist, fine to med. grained, no odor - 7~'-14'.: S.~ND: yellowish brmm, slighl - -- ~V ly moist, fine to coarse l0 grained, clean, no odor '.. - olive, strong odor - [4'-tY~': ~ANDY CLAY' olive, moist, 15~ jar .fine to medium sand fraction. _ silty, strong odor 20~ jar 19½,-24,: SILTY SAND- olive, ~oist, _ fine to medium sand fraction _ strong odor, lens of clay ~ at 20~' 25 LO¢~T[O~: See Site Plan EL£V~TION: ~" LO~£D BY: D.T.' 8" Hollow-stem Auger ,)AT': ,)R,.,.'O: .rEST BORING LOG aob ,Nc). 80-4981 12/10/8(~ _ DATE REPORTED: 1/17/87 -- No. 2 *' .SOILS ENGINEERING INC. Peye Of DEPTH ,~dVtPLE~ SOIL ' % DENSITY %FINES FRICTION GROUP SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF ~tZOO) ANGLE 25 ~4' -29': SAND: .yellowish bro~qq, slighl ly sly.' moist, fine to coarse graine(, _ - moderate odor ~_ - 30~ jar 29'-39': SILTY SAN]3: yellowish broths, SM slightly moist, fine to med _ -- sand fraction, trace of odor 40z jar 59'-41': SAND: light gray, slightly _ ' SP moist, fine to med grained, -~ clean, trace of odor Terminated at 41'; No groundwater · _ -- encountered ~ - LOCATION: See Site Plan ,ELEVATION: EQUIPMENT= 8" Hollow-stem Auger lOGGED. BY: D.T. ~ Oll,,I I#OlNIEIRII~G DATE DRILLED: rE:ST BORING LOG Job'No. 8°-49Sl DATE REPORTED: 1/17/87 NO. 3 .* SOILS ENGINEERING INC. -' PAge Of DEPTH ,.~ SOIL % DENSITY.-%F,N~SrmCT~O~ ~ROUP SO.IL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF (..,~ZOO) ANSLE 0 _ 3'-4': CLAYEY SAND: yellowish bro~ - _ SC moist, fine to med. grained, - no odor - ,_6,. SILTY SAND: reddish brown, - SM moist, fine to. medium sand . ~ fradtion~ no odor ,,~ - -~ fine to med. grained, no odor/ _ 10 SC 7½,_13½,: CLAYEY SAND: gray, moist, fir ~, .-- to coarse grained, strong' ode r _ -- ~. .3½'-16': CLAYEY SILT: olive, moist, - ... 15'jar strong gasoline odor - ~- SM ·6'-23'' SILTY SAND: olive, moist, fir~ - sand fraction, strong gasolin~ _ ' odor I 20 * jar -- _ SS~ ~.3'-28" SAND: yellowish brown, slighl:ly _ 25 moist, fine to med. grained, _ clean, strong gasoline odor . See Site Plan ELEVATION: LOCATION :~ 8" Hollow-stem Auger "LOGGED BY: D.T. EQUIPMENT:-. · OIL~ ENGINEERING DATE REPORTED: 1/1'7/87 NO..3 .- ,SOILS ENGINEERING · · Pa Of % DENSITY %FII~$ FRICTION 'DEPTH SAMPI.~ SOIL. SOIL DESCRIPTION MOIST. PCF ~ZOO) ANGLE GROUP 30 SM' 28'-35':' SILTY SAND: olive, slightly _ moist, fine. to coarse sand fraction, well graded, -- moderate gasoline odor 35' -- SW 35'-41': SAND: gray, slightly moist, fine to medium grained, clea~., strong odor 40 i, ~ Drilling Terminated at 41' - No groundwater encountered - - - lOCATION: "See Site Plan ~ FLEYATION: LOGG£D BY: O.T. EOUIPM£NT: 8" }tellow-stem Auger .. LABORATORi I~TIId~LELI¥ ~ MAIN OFI:'IGE: 4100 PIERGE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, GA. 93308 PHONE 327-4g~ Purgeable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: DAVID TORII Date of 8901 "H" ST:. REpORT:lS-S8-86 BAKERSFIELD, CA. 9330.1 LAB No.:88437 Sample Description: #4981B-1 @15' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 18-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 18-18-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 18-80-86 Constituent Reporting Units Analyses Results Benzene ug/g 8.33 Toluene ug/g 8.51 Ethyl Benzene ug/g 3.86 p-Xylene ug/g 4.55 m-Xylene ug/g 10.15 o-Xylene ug/g 7.79 Isopropyl Benzene ug/g 0.96 TVH ug/g 202.00 EPA 5080/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS ' . LABORATORIES ' ~ j j. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. INGII. PETIIOLEUId ~ ' MAiN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491' SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 2901 "H" ST. BAKERSFIELD', CA. 93301 Purgeable Aromatics DAVID TORIi ' Sample,Description: ~4981 B-1 @30' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TI'ME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 1~-18~86 Const i tuent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl BenZene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Date 'of REPORT:12-28-86 LAB No.:E2A38 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Analyses Re'suits Minimum RePorting Level 82.38 356.89 116.98 152.24 350.90 219.63 19.05 4546.76 0.I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS ... iit[li LABORATORI · .,---,..'"'-. ~1~1~1~' "J' ,o,,,,, ,,G. c.,,,. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 2901 "H" ST'. BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301 DAVID TORII Sample Description: ~A981B-E @15' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 18'18-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-X¥1ene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS Date of REPORT,:12-22-86 LAB No.:22q39 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Analyses Results none none none none none none none none detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 LABO RATO RI ES INC. J. ,I. EGtlt, i, IIEG. (:HEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-49~ SOILS ENGINEERING ~ATTN: 2901 "H" ST. BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301 Purgeabie Aromatics DAVID TORII, Sample Description: ~q981 B-2 830' DPTE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED": 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 12-18-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g' EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL .DRY MATTER BASIS Date of. REPORT:12-22-86 LAB No.:22A40 DATE ANALYSI~S COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Analyses Results Minimum Reporting Level none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 '0.1 0~1 0.5 ~,,,,~,,,,,,~,.. ~1'~.... ~ LABO RATO.R I ES ,~. J. J. 'EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. ~TROLEUM ~ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERGE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 9330B PHONE 327-4~' SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: 2901 "H" ST. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Sample Description: ~4981 DATE/TIME' SAMPLE COLLECTED:' 12-18-86 Purgeable Aromatics DAVID TORII B-3 @20' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB:' 18-18-86 Date of REPORT:lB-28-86 LAB No.:88AA1 'DATE ANALYSIS / COMPLETED- 12-20-86 Constituent 'Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-X¥1ene m-Xylene o-Xylene 'Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA '5080/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS Analyses Results 10.95 62.15 31.07 46.65 103.66 91.71 13.73 3227.93 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.'1 0.1 0.1 0.i 0.5 J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHE . ~NG . MAIN OFFICEi 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-491 Purgeable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATTN: DAVID TORII Date of REPORT:lB-8~-86 2901 "H" ST' LAB No.:2244B BAKERSSFIELD, CA. 93301 Sample Description: ~4981 B-3 @30' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 12-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 12-18-86 Constituent Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o..Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH Reporting Units ug/~ ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020Y8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIE DRY MATTER BASIS DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 12-20-86 Analyses Results none none none none none none none none detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.i 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 ... lli I LABORATORI J, I. EGLIN, BEG. CHEM. ~NGR: · PETROLEUM ~ MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-49 ~OZLS ENGINEERING ATTN: ~0! "H" ST. B~KERSSFIELD~ CA. ~3301 Sample Description: #4981 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 18-18-86 Purgeable Aromatics DAVID TORII B-3 @~0' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 18-18-86 Date of REPORT:12-22-86 LAB No.:22q43 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 18-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-X¥1ene o=Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g 'ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: SOIL DRY MATTER BASIS Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By CRANE - State Contractors Licence No, 413913 TRUCKING CONST. 2201 Stevens Office 871-2066 - 325-9851 Kern County Health Dept. Division of Enviromental Health 1700 Flower St. Bakersfield, Ca. 93301 October 6, 1986 ATTN: Bill Scheide Regarding the contaminated soil we, at Wegener Construction, encountered after abandoning'a 550 gal. tank at Union Cemetary, as a preliminary at- ' 'tempt in evaluating the extent of the contamination we now proposeto take soil samples at the locations and depths indicated on the attached diagram.' Upon receipt of the lab analysis, it is our suggestion , if the results show the contamination to be isolated to the immediate vacinity, that'we excavate and airiate the contaminated 'soil. However, if the results show that plume has extended beyond the iimits of our tests, at that time we intend to bring an enviromental consultant in to develop an efficient and an.economical plan to handle the contamination. Sincerely, i~ ; /~/Y! R. "Dutch" Goedhart C.F.O. RG:Jw .I 5 ~MERGEN~_~'j !STATE TANK ID-~- ~ yES ~1~ NO HAS STATE OFFI(~E OF EMERGENCY SERVICES REPORT DATE I LO;AL.CASE ~ 'REGIONAL BOARD CASE ~ I US EPA ID I ~ STREET . ~TATE ' ZIP PHONE O LO~AL AGENCY AGENCY NAME CONTACT PERSON. . ( ) m (GALLONS) CAS ~ (ATTACH EXTRA SHEET iF NEEDED) N~ . QUANTITY LOST ~Z ~ ~ j DATE DISCHARGE BEGAN METHOD USED TO STOP DISCHARGE (CHECK ALL THA" A"'~Y) [-~ RE~AIR TANK ~ HAS DISCHARGE BEEN STOPPED?~ ~ REPAIR PIPING ~CHANGE PROCEDURES ~S ~ NO IF Y~S. DAT~ J~ MJZ~J~D[ ~YJ~Yi~OTHER ',SO~RCE(S)LEAKOF DISCHARGE TANKS ONLY/CAPACItY ~) GAL CAUSE(S) ~ ~TA NK. ~ UNKNOWN · ~ OVERFILL RROSIO" ~ ~ PIPING 'LEAK MATERIAL ~ RUPTUR~FAILURE ~] SPILL ~ ~ OTHE~ (SPECIFY) . ~ YES NO THREATENED UNKNOWN YES NO ENED KNOWN WELLS ~ = BUILDING OR UTILITY VAU~T ~ : ~ · ~ AGRICULTURA~ ~ GROUNDWATER BASIN NAME , ~ HNKNOWN COMPLETE AN~ ATTACH A CLEANUP TRACKING REPORT IF ANY CLEANUP WORK OR PLANNING HAS STARTED HSC OB (10/SS) 'SOILS ENGINEER[ iNC. 2901 H StreeL BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805). 327-7065 · SHEET NO I CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE DATE soILS ENGINEER INC. 2901 H Str( BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 (805) 327-7065 SHEET NC CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE DATE 'F_.. CHEMICAL A~AL )'~ PETROLELIId LABORATORIES CHEM. EHGL MAIN OFFICE.~ 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOUG 4204 ARMOUR: AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER Sample Description: lst.HOLE 15' Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18511 DATE/TIM~ SAMPLE cOLLECTED: 10-15-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-17.-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene~ TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g' ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOiL Analyses Results none none none none none detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level .0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By RI J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGR. INC. MAIN OFFICE:*4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327.4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOUG 4BOA ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSF~ELD~'CA. 93308 Sample Description: 1st. Purgeable Aromatics ~EGENER HOLE 20 ' Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18512 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-17-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-xylene o-Xylene Isopropy1 Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography .Co'mments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By C~I£1,11CAL ANALYSIS LABORATORIES J. J. EGiI#. lEG. CHEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOUG 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 ' Sample Description: 1st- Purgeable WEGENER · HOLE Aromatics Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18513 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-17-86 Constituent· Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl TVH Reporting Units Benzene ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL Analyses Results none none none none none none none none detected detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 CHEMICAL ANIJL I'e.~ PETROLEUM LABORATORI J. J. EGI. IN. lEG. CHEM. ENGEI. INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT.DOUG 4204 ARMOUR"AVE- BAKERSFIELD~ CA. 93308 Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER Sample Description': 2nd HOLE 15' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15-86' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 Dateof REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18514 DATE ~ ANALYSIS COMPLETED: ' . 10-'17-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-X¥1ene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g .ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5'020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 29.23 206.83 92.74 112.66 253.'?2 219.A1 40.38 15310.53 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL By A6RICUL TIJI~E CHEMICAL A~ALY~ · PETROLELIM RATORI J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGL INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 933~)8 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT.DOUG 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: 2nd Purgeable WEGENER HOLE 80' Aromatics Dat*e of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18515 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-i5-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED · LAB: 10-16-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-17-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p~Xyl'ene m-Xylene o-Xylene IsOpropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g · ug/g ug/g ug/g .. ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results -8.80 9.33 none detected 66.69 154.09 82.89 4569.30 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.I 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comment~: UNION CEMETARY SOIL By CHEMICJJL ANALYSIS PETROLEUM RATORIES J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGll. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD~ BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. ~OUG A204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Purgeabie WEGENER Sample Description: 2nd HOLE 25' Aromatics Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18516 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15,86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl~ Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g .ug/g ug/g .ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography ~omments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-17-86 Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected 'none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By LABORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOuG 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: 3rd. Pu'rgeable Aromat'ics WEGENER HOLE lO' Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18517 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene ~ .m-Xylene o-Xylene Isoprop¥1 Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-19-86 Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 C#EM/C4[ LABORATO.RIES J. J. [GLIN. lEG. CHEM. [NGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOUG 4204'ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Descri-ption:. 3rd. DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-15-86 Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER HOLE 15' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18518 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-19-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene , m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments UNION CEMETARY SOIL Analyses Results none none none none none none none none detected' detected detected detected detected detected detected detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By ,; A~RI(~IL CHEMIC4I AAIAL YSIS '; ORATORI $. J. EGLIN. IIEG. CHEM. ENGIt. INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE R'OAD~ BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONST. ATT. DOUG 420q ARMOUR,AVE. BAKERSFIELD~ CA. 93308 Sample Description: 3rd. Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER HOLE 20' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED:, 10-15-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-16-86 Constituent Reporting Unit's Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl,Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL, Date of REPORT:lO-l?-86 LAB No.:18519 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: '10-i?-86 Analyses Results none.detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Ctf£MIGAL ANALI~ PETROLL~IM LABORATORIES IN(]. J. J. EGLIN. lEG. CHEM. ENGI. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA~ 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable WEGENER CONSTRUCTION - ASOA ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, 'CA. 93308 4~, 'Sample Description: CENTER 15 - 16 Aromatics Date of. REPORT:lO-~O-86 LAB No.:18A33 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-18-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-80-86 Constituent Reporting Units B~nzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g .EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 10.35 35.77 90.9? 136.00 282.51' 244.19 AA.VA 13A03.85 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 O.i 0.1 0.! 0.1 0.1 O. 1 0.5 Comments: UNION CEMETARY' CENTER 15 - 16 1/2 SOIL LABORATOR! J. J. EG~IN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. INC .. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromati'cs SOILS ENGINEERING ATT. TONY FRANZEE 2901 "H" STREER BAKERSFIELD, CA., 93301 Sample Desaription: CENTER 20-21' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 11'-3-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 11-4-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene E~hyl Benzene p-X¥1ene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isapropyl TVH Benzene ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Date Of REPORT:Il-6=86 LAB No.:19683 Analyses Results 72.66 2A6.91 133.85 176.96 3AO.~q 292.48 65.39 6157,.70 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 11-6-86 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.! 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.I 0.5 CommentE: TVH: NOT TOTAL 'UNION CEMETARY PETROLEUM'HYDROCARBONS SOIL .By CtlEMICAL AIML I'~ I~'TitOLEU¥ LABORATORI J. J. I:G~IN, lEG. CHEM. ENGII. INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING A,TT. TONY FRANZEE 2901 "H" STREER BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 ~SamPle Description: CENTER 25-26' DATE/TIME SAMPLE cOLlECTED: 11L3-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 11-q-86 .Constituent Reporting Units Benzene ~oluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g 'ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/80~0 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Date of REPORT:il-6-86 LAB No.:1968A DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 11-6'86 Analyses Results q6.62 311.25 148.19 215.71 A?9.2.A 376.67 37.'28 6089.38 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 O.i 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: T~H: NOT TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS UNION CEMETARY SOIL A~IIIClJL Clt~ICAL AliL4L t'~ . PETItOL EU¥ ATORI j. j. EGLiN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-49.11. Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER CONSTRUCTION 4~04 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: CENTER 30-31' Date~iof REPORT:lO-20-86 LAB No. :18434 DATE/TIME SAMPLE ~COLLECTED: 10-12-8~ DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @'LAB: 10-13-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g 'ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 91.65 24E.37 115.35 147.6A 324.42 214.96 25.47 12510.79 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-80-86 Min mum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL £HE~ICAL ANAL I~ PETIIOLEU¥ LABORATORI J. J. EG~IN. lEG. CHEM. ENGI. . INC. . MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-~4911 SOILS ENGINEER'ING ATT. 2901 "H" S.TREER BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Sample Description: DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 11-3-86 . Purgeable Aromatics TONY FRANZEE CENTER 35-36' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED 8 LAB: 11-A-86 Date of REPORT:Il-6-86 LAB No.:19685 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 11-6-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-X~'lene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH' 'ug~g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By' Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 81.68 35.81 3q.75 53.80 62.93 lO.qO 8665.0~ .Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 O.i 0.1 0.1 O.l 0.1 0.5 Commen'ts: TVH: NOT TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS UNION CEMETAR¥ SOIL ~ AGi~ICULTUItE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PETIIOLEUM LABORATORI J. J. EGLIN. lEG. '(::HEM. ENGe. INC. 0 MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable Aromatics SOILS ENGINEERING ATT. TONY FRANZEE 2901 "H" STREER BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Sample Description: CENTER 40-41' Date of REPORT:Il-6-86 LAB No.:19686 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 11-3-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED ~ LAB: 11-A-86 DATE ANALYSI~ COMPLETED: 11-6-86 Constituent Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-×ylene Is~propyl TVH Benzene Reporting Units ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8080 TVH: By Gas Ch~-omatography Analyses Results 3.22 72.57 97.60 120.72 260.83 200.53 27.61 2377.91 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 O. ! 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: TVH: NOT TOTAL PETROLEUM UNION CEMETARY SOIL HYDROCARBONS LABORATORIES J. J. EGIIN, lEG. CHEM. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Purgeable WEGENER CONSTRUCTION 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, -CA. 93308 ~ Sample Description: CENTER 45-A6' Aromatics DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-12-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene ~m-Xylene o-X¥1ene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL Date of REPORT:lO-20-86 LAB No.:18435 Analyses Results none none none none ~one none 'DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: ] 10-20-86 Minimum Reporting Level detected 0.17 detected detected detected detected detected 1.72 0.i 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By CHEMICAL AAML ~ 'PETROLEUM LABORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 Wegener Constrution A20A Armour ave. Bakersfie!'d~CA.93308 Sample Purgeabie Description: 14'bel'ow east Aromatics Date of REPORT:lO-9-86 LAB No.:17958 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-5-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: " 10-6-86 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: ~ 10-9-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene ~ o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/~g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected ~one detected none detected 0.00 Minimum Reporting Level 0.! 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 05 Comments: Union'Cemetury Soil By CHEI~ICAL AIL4L I'~ PETIIOLEUII J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD. BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 SOILS ENGINEERING.ATT. 2901 "H" STREER BAKERSFIELD~ CA. ~3301 Sample Description: DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 11-3-86 Purgeable Aromatics TONY FRANZEE 3'WEST 15-16' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED ~ LAB: 11-4-86 Date of REPORT:Il-6-86 LAB No.:19687 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 11-6=86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Tolueoe Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g · ug/g ug/g Comments: EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography TVH: NOT TOTAL PETROLELJM HYDROCARBONS UNION CEMETARY SOIL Analyses Results none detected none detected none detected none detected 3.52 2.90 none detected 116.17 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By CHEMICAl AI~4L YSIS PETROLEUM ORATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGII. · MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONSTRUCTION 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: 3' Purgeable WEST 20-21 Acomat ic=- Date of REPORT:lO-~O-86 LAB No.:18~36 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-12-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED ~ LAB: 10-13-86 DATE ANALY.SIS COMPLETED: 10-80-86 Constituent Reporti.ng Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene .m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g. ~omments: EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas ChromatograPhy UNION CEMETARY SOIL Analyses Results 11.55 11.98 5.99 8.79 19.96 13.35 0.90 18974.04 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 O. 1 O.l 0.5 RATORIES J. J. EGLIN. lEG. CHEM. ENGII. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONSTRUCTION A804 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA..93308 Sample Description: 3' Purgeable WEST 25-26' Aromatics DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-12-S6 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 Constituent Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene isopropyl Benzene TVH Reporting Units ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL Date of REPORT:lO-80-86 LAB No.:18437 DATE ANALYS S COMPLETED:' 10-20-86 Analyses Results 0.?8. none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected none detected 1820.76 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 · 0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 PETROLEUM RATORIES J. J. EGLIN, lEG. CHEM. ENGI. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93306 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONSTRUCTION 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED.: 10~18-86 Purg~able A~omatics WEST 30-31' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 Date of REPORT:lO-80-86 LAB No.:18A38 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-20-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m~Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5080/8080 TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 8.43 13.98 19.19 30.34 .68.~6 56.89 8.13 3018.48 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.~1 0.1 O.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: UNION CEMETARY SOIL PETMOIEU¥ LABORATORIES ,,,,,::. J. J. EGLIN,'REG. CHEM. ENGt. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 WEGENER CONSTRUC'TION 4204 ARMOUR AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 Sample Description: 3' DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-12-86 Purgeable Aromat'ics SOUTH 15-16' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 Date of R~PORT:lO-20-86 LAB No.:18A39 DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 10-20-86 Constituent .Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xy, lene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g .ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By Gas Chromatography AnalysesI Results' none detected none detected none detected none detected 0.11 0.12 none detected 1011.78 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 Comments: Uf{ION CEMETARY SOIL £1~I~II~AL AI~L4LI~ RATORIES J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD. CA. 93308 PHONE 327'491 WEGENER CONSTRUCTION 4204 ARMOUR AVE. ~ BAKERSFIEL-D, CA. 93308 Sample Description: 3' DATE/TIME sAMPLE COLLECTED: 10-12-86 Purgeable Aromatics SOUTH 20-21' DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 10-13-86 Date of REPOR]:lO-20-86 LAB No.:18AqO DATE ANALYSIS COMPLETED: :' 10-20-86 Const i tuent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 TVH: By' Gas Chromatography Analyses Results none detected none detected none'detected none detected none detected none detected none detected 235.66 Minimum Reporting Level 0..1 0.1 0~1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.I 0.5 Comments: UNION SOIL CEME~ARY 'By MAiN OFFICE 4100 PIERCE~ROAD BAKERSFIELD CA,Tgi:308 PHONE 327-49] -~ : Purgeable Aromatics WEGENER. CONST. CO. 4204 ARMOUR AVE. ' ' BAKERSFIELD,CALIF. 93308 Sample Description: UNION CEM. Date of REPORT:9-88-86 LAB No.:17304 DATE/TIME SAMPLE COLLECTED: 9-25-86 DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIVED @ LAB: 9-25,86 DATE~ ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 9-28-86 Constituent Reporting Units Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene p-Xylene m-Xylene o-Xylene Isopropyl Benzene TVH ug/g ug/g ug/g .ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g ug/g EPA 5020/8020 -TVH: By Gas Chromatography Analyses Results 6.08 25.77 11.'00 15.26 35.39 19.61 none detected 607.78 Minimum Reporting Level 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 By Facility [] Permit .to Operate % [] Permit to Operate Application [] Construction Permit % ' [] Construction Permit Application ~] Permit to Abandon % ~_ Application to Abandon [] Amended Permit Conditions [] Annual Report Forms FILE CONTENTS INVENTORY Date %Tanks Plot Plan / Date Date Date No. of Tanks ' Date tank (s) Date. ~//=//~ Modification ~Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator ~'Inspection Reports [~Correspondence - Received Date Date Date Date ~Correspondence - Mailed Date Date' Date Date [] Unauthorized Release Reports []Abandonment/Closure Reports [] Sampling/Lab Reports ~ '~MVF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) [] STD Compliance Check(New Construction Checklist) [] MVF Plan Check (New Construction) [] STD Plan Check (New Construction) ~] MVF Plan Check (Existing Facil.ity) [] STD Plan Check (Existing Facility) ~] "Incomplete Application" Form ~3 Permit Application Checklist [] Permit Instructions [] Tightness Test Results [] Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits [] Discarded Date Date Date [] EnVironmental Sensitivity Data: ~]Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs []Location of Water Wells []Statement of Underground Conduits ~]Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally Sensitive Data [] Photos [~Construction Drawings Location: [] Half sheet showing date received and tally of inspection time, etc [] Miscellaneous 1700 Flower Street R Bakersfield, Cailfornla 93305 Telephone (805) 861-3636 ~PEI~II'? FOR ?E.~IPORARY OR pER~I~I~NT CI'.OSUEE/ABANDONt4ENT OF UNDERGROUND .BAZARDOUS' SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY ~-'RN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEi~/ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION HEALTH OFRCER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Reicherd :PER~IT NUMBER A262-21 ~''' Union Cemetery 'Union 'Cemetery Assn. ' Negener' Construction ?00 Po[o=ac Avenue ~ P.O. Box 3066 .,., ~ ~ -~., .' :,'.4204 A~=ou~ Avenue ~F-'?~"~,:~:?~?~'- %.. . . ;.. ~: ..... . ~ ...... ,,. ~ ~' ...... ~:- · - ~.~ ' -~-. PER~IT TO ABANDON ............ ::.: ~, % ~, .:~..PE~IT EXPIRES - September 25, I987 I TANK AT ABOVE ' ' ' APPROVAL DATE ' September 25, i986 : :' OCA, O,. ' · ,. ., · -Bill Scheide .... -. · .. . . -' , . : '.:~..~ :": ....,~,. ' .. ~'( :,':;,'. , ....-',./ .. , . . -. . ' POST ON'PREmISES. '' ~' · CONDITIONS AS FOLLONS:' . 1. Permittee must obtain a Fire Department period prior to initiating abandonment actlon. 2. All procedures used ~ust be in accordance ~ith requirements of Standards and Guidelines developed for i~plementation of Kern County Ordinance Code. 'A copy of these requirements are enclosed ~i.th this permit. 3. A minimum of t~o 'samples must be retrieved beneath the center of the tank at depths of approximately 2~ and 6~ 4. All samples ~ust be analyzed for benzene, toIuene, .xyle~e, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. 5. Advise this office of the time and date of proposed sampling ~ith 24 hours advance notice. ACCEPTED BY ~/~ DATE Delano · -~ DISTRICT OFFICES -- Lamont . Lake Isabel~ Mojave . Rldgecrest . Shelter . Taft - ' liern County Health Depa~tme~ Division of Environmental Health ' 1700 Flower Street, Baker. sfield, CA 93305 Permit , ~ Application e No. of Tanks to be Abandoned '" APPLICATION FOR PEPJ~IT FO~ TEMPO~ O~ PE~i~ CLOS~ABAND~ OF UNDE~'~RDE~D HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Ae Ce Type of ~Application (Fill Out One Application Per Facility) [-]Temporary Closure/Abandonmen--~ , ~Permanent Closure/Abandonment Project Contact (name, area code, phone): Days 324-9648 Nights ' SAME Facility Name Union Cemetery Facility Address 700 Potomac Ave. - Nearest Cross St. Kink T R SEC (R,~ral Locations Only) Owner Union Ceme~e~ Assn. Telephone 324-9648, Address P.O.Box 3066t Bakersfield, Ca, Zip Operator Frank Dobesh Telephone Address- P,O, ~x 3066: ~.ker~f4.1d; ('~- Zip Water to Facility Provided by ~.rn Co. W.t.r A~_eney Soil Characteristics at Facility Sand & Clay Basi~ for Soil Type and Ground~ter Depth,Deteminations Depth to Groundwater Kern Co. Water A~ene? Tank Removal Contractor Wemene~ Construct4on CA License No. &lqgl~ Address 4204 Armour Awe. Bakersfield Zip 93308 Telephone Proposed Starting Date 9/24/86 , Proposed C~npletion Date g/26/R6 Worker's Compensation Certification ~ 543164-85 Insurer Star- Environmental Asses~nent Contractor Address Proposed Starting Date Worker's Compensation Certification CA License No. Telephone Proposed Ccmpletion Date Insurer Chamical Composition of Materials Stored Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co,mmercial name), Dates Stored to to ,~ to to Chemical Previously Stored (if different) : E. Describe Method for Retrieving Samples Hand Auger Samples Will be Analyzed ~or Hydrocarbons Laboratory That Will Perform Analyses of Samples B.C. Laboratories Address 4100 Pierce Rd.~ Bakersfield, Ca. Telephone 327-4911 F. This application-for: ~removal or [qabandonment in place * * PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED'ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET BEFORE SUBMITTING ,APPLICATION FOR REVIEW. This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. 'j Include Ail the FollOwing [nfo~mation: ~ Location of Tank(s), Piping & Dispenser(s) ---- proPOsed Sampling L.ocations .Indicating Approximate Depth of' Samples.. Nearest street or I,ntersection r Any Water Wells or Surface Waters Within 100' Radius of Facility Provided Below; NORTH C ~.( Approved By Scale Facility [] Permit' to Operate S ~ · . _ ~ Date [~permit to ·operate Application ~Tanks Plot P-l~n ConstructiOn Permit % ~ Date ~ Construction Permit Application [] P~'rmit to Abandon [] APplication to Abandon [] Amended Permit Conditions [] Annual Report Forms ~-~ Date ~/000~,'~ Date No. of Tanks Date tank(s) Date Modification [] Copy.of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator [] Inspection Reports [] Correspondence Received Date Date Date Date [] Correspondence - Mailed Date Date· Date Date [] unauthorized Release Reports []Abandonment/Closure Reports [] Sampling/LabReports '[]MVF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) [] eTD Compliance. Check (New Construction Checklist) []MVF Plan Check (New Construction) [] STD Plan Check (New Construction) [~MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility) '[] eTD Plan Check (Existing Facility) [] "Incomplete Application" Form [] Permit Application Checklist [] Permit'Instructions [] Tightness Test Results D Discarded Date Date Date [] Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits [] Environmental Sensitivity Data: [] Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs [] Location of Water Wells [] Statement of Underground Conduits [] Plot Plan Featuring All Environmentally sensitive Data [] Photos [] Construction Drawings Location: [] Half sheet showing dat. e received and tally of inspegtion time, et.c ~ Miscellaneous ~ision o~Environmental Heal~ ' · Application~De~ ~700 Flower Street, Bakersfield~.b% 93305 ,i ae APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY ~ of Application (check): ~N~-~ Facility .EModification of Facility [~]Existing Facility Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days Frank Dobesh 805-324-96&R Nights Richard Carter 805-831-456~' Facility Na~e Union Cemetar~. No. of Tanks 2 Type of Business (check): ['lGa~l'ine Station --~'Other (describe) Cemetary Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? OYes ~No Is' Tank(s) Used Primarily for. ~gricultural Purposes? EYes ~ No Facility Address-' 700 Potomac Ave. Nearest Cross St. King T R SEC Owner U~on Cemetary Assn Address P.O.Box 3066,.Bakersfield Operator Frank Dobesh Address P.O. Box 3066,Bakersfield ETranSfer of Ownership (Rural Locations .~ly) 'Contact Perso~ Frank D°besh Zip 93385 Telephone .805-324-96'~8 Contact Person Frank Dobesh Zip 93385 Telephone 805-324-9648 <: B. Water to Fa..cil. ity.P_rOvi_ded.by .. Kern . Co... .Water Agency. -Depth ..to'.GroUndwater.-~-:220~ :.~ .... ,"!.-.-'~ii' '~aractertsttcs''at Facilt~ ~ ~ · Basis for Soil'Type and Groundwater Depth' Determinations Kern Co; Water Agency Ce Contractor We~ener Construction CA Contractor's License No,_.~A13913 Address 4204:Armour ~ve..Bakersfield ' Zip 93308 Telephone 805-325-9851 Proposed Starting Date ASAP . PropoSed '~cmpl~tionDate 2 weeks Worker's CcmpensationCertification ~ 5~31~&-85 Insurer Stare'Fund D. If This Permit Is. For Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly Describe Modifications proposed N/A E~ Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): ~ Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded 2 , O [] [] [] [] 'D [] O O [] ri Regular Premium Diesel Waste ' -51I- B B B B. Chemical Composition of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fuels) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) CAS t (if known) Chemical previougly Stored : (if different) 1 ~asolt.ne Transfer of Ownership Date of '~-~nsfer Previous Facility Name I, N/A ,, Previous Owner ~odi fy or terminate the facility upon receiving this completed fomn. accept fully all ~61i'gations of Permit No. __ issued to · I understand that the Permitting. Authority may review and transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergroU~d storage This fern has been completed under penalty of true and correct. z/ perjury and to the best of my knowledge is Title C,E.,O, Date TANK # (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACIi TANK) FOR EACII SECTION, CtlEOK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES 1. Tank is: [~ Vaulted [] Non-Vaulted ~ Double-Wall [] Single-Wall 2. Tank Material [] 'Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Glad steel ~K Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze []Unknown [] Other (describe): S. Primary Containment ' DateASApInstalled Thickness. 3/8,, (InChes) C~PacitYl(Gall°ns)550 ga; . XerxesManufacturercorn. 4 Tank Secondary Containment [~X Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner [] Lined Vault [] None [] Unknown- [~], Other (describe): " Material Fiberglass/Plast~6ickness (Inches) 3/6:: Manufacturer:' Xerxes Cor~. , Capacity (Gals.) 665 5.'Tank Interior Lining [] Rubber [] Alkyd [2]Epoxy fqPhenoltc ~Glass [2] Clay [] Unlined [] Unknown [] Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection [] Galvanized ~Fiberglass-Clad. [] Polyethylene. Wrap [] Vinyl Wrapping .' ~.~:.;~i-..z . .: i-] Tar or Asphalt [] UnKnown [] None [] Other' (describe): 'Cathodic Protection: [] None [] Impressed Current System [] Sacrificial Anode System [~ Describe System & Equipment: ': 7. Leak Detection,'Monitortng, and Interception a. Tank: [] Visual (vaulted tanks only) [] GrOundwater Monitoring Well(s) ~ Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [] U-Tube Without Line~ [] D-Tube with Compatible Liner Directing Flow To Monitoring Well(s)* [] Vapor Detector'*[] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivity Sensor* ~' Pressure Sensor In Annular Space Of Double Wall Tank * [] Liquid Retrieval.& Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well ~] Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [~' Periodic Tightness Testing [] None [] Unknown [] Other b. Piping: [] Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) For Pressurized Piping* [~Monitoring Sump With Raceway [] Sealed Concrete Raceway []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe-Raceway ~Synthetio Liner Raceway [] None [] Unknown ~ Other do,,h~- w,~l ~vstem with mou~torin~-sumn *Describe Make & Model:', N/A 8. Tan~ Tightness Has' This .Tank Been ~ightness Tested? Date Of Last Tightness Test Test Name 9. Tank Repair Tank Repaired? [~. Yes [] No .Date(s) Of Repair(s) Describe Repairs [] Yes [] No [] Unknown Results Of Test Testing Company ~UnknoWn 10. Overfill Protection [~xOperator Fills, Control.s,.& Visually Monitors Level [] Tape Float Gauge ~ Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut-Off Controls ~( Sealed Fill Box [] None [] Unknown List Make & Model For Above Devices OPW 53%94 Vent Valves ~[ Yes [] No [] Unknown Material Fiberglass .OTfl Diameter 2.375 Manufacturer A.O.Smith [~ Pressure ~xSuction [] Gravity Approximate Length Of Pipe Run 10' b. underground Piping Corrosion Protection: [~ Galvanized ~ Fiberglass-Clad [] Impressed Current .[] 'Sacrificial Anode [~ P°lyethylene Wrap [] Electrical Isolation [] Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or Asphalt [2] 'Unknown' [] None [] Other (describe): ~ c. U~iderground Piping, Secondary Containment: ~-~ Double-Wall' [] Synthetic Liner System [] None [] Unknown [] Other (describe): [] Capacitance Sensor [] Other: Op~ 12~ ~tll hn~ 11. Piping, a. Underground Piping: Thickness (inches) ...... :... TA ' ~ '?"~ NK) ' NK (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM EACH TA FOR EACI! SECTION, CIIECK ALL APPROPRIATE ~OXES:' .1. ~ank is: []¥aulted [] Nba-Vaulted ~kDouble-Wall [] Single-Wall 2. Tank Material -[] 'Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvtnyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel [] Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze []Unknown [] Other (describe): 3. Primary Containment · Date Installed Thickness (Inches) 'c~Pacity (Gallons) Manufacturer AgA~ ' ~/8" 350 ~al.. Xerxes Cor~ 4. Tan____~kSecondary Containment C~x Double-Wall [] Synthetic'Liner [] Lined Vault C] None [] Unknown [~ Other (describe): Manufacturer: Xerxes CDr,. Material wh.~ln~/pln~tt~ckness (Incites) 3/8" Capacity (Gals.) 605 5.'Tank Interior Lining . [] Rubber [] Alkyd [q EpoxY. [2]Phenolic ~ Glass [] Clay [] 0alined [] Unknown [] Other (describe}: 6. Tank ~orrostonProtectton ' " . [] Galvanized [~ Fiberglass-Clad [] Polyethylene Wrap [] Vinyl Wrapping [] Tar orAsphalt [~ Unknown .'[] None [] Other' (describe)".... : " ~ ' ' 'Cathodic Protection: [] None [] Impressed Current System [] Sacrificial Anode System [~ Describe System & Equipment: ~. Leak Detectio~., Monitoring, and ~nterception a. Tank: [] Visual (vaulted tanks 0nly) [] Groundwater Monitoring Well(s) [] Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [] U-Tube Without Liner [].U-Tube with Compatible Liner Directing Flow To Monitoring Well(s)* [] Vapor Detector'*[] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivity Sensor* ~ Pressure Sensor' In Annular Space Of Double Wall .Tank* [] Liquid Retrieval.& Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well Or Annular Space ~Datly Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation ~. Periodic Tightness Testing [] None [] Unknown [] Other b. Piping: [] Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) For Pressurized Piping* [~Monitoring sump With Raceway [] Sealed Concrete Raceway Ii. Half-Cut Compatible Pipe-Raceway []Synthetic Liner Raceway '~ None []Unknown [] Other d'nub].~ wall svstem with monitorin~ · 'Describe Make & Model:. 8. Tan~ ~tEhtnes~- Has This Tank Been Tightness Tested? Iq Yes [] No [] Unknown ., Date Of Last.Tightness Test ~ Results Of Test Test Name N/A. ' . Testin~ Company' 9. Tank. Repair Tank Repaired7 ~].Yes [] No []Unknown Date(s) Of Repair(s) " Describe Repairs N/A 10, Overfill Protection , ~ Operator Fills, Controls,.& Visually Monitors Level [] Tape Float Gauge ~ Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut-Off Controls [-] Capacitance Sensor [] sealed Fill Box [] None' [] 'Unknown [] Other: List Make a Model For Above Devices OpW ~2 F~11 hm~ OPW 53VM v-at valves '~. _Piping, a. Underground Piping: [] Yes [] No [] Unknown · Material Thickness.(inches) .070 Diameter 2.375 Manufacturer A.O.Sm~--- [] Pressure [-~Sdction [] Gravity ApproxSmate Length Of Pipe Run 10' b. underground Piping Corrosion Protection: [] Galvanized ~Fiberglass-Clad [] Impressed Current [] "Sacrificial Anode [~ Polyethylene Wrap [] Electrical Isolation [] Vinyl Wrap []Tar or'Asphalt [~. Unknown [] None F] Other (describe): c. Uiiderground Piping, Secondary Containment: ~][ Double-Wall ['] Synthetic Liner System [] None [] Unknown [] .Other'(describe): UL LISTED RED THREAD~,I! PRODUCT PIPING Bulletin No. 1004 Apd115,1986 RED THREAD~[! DOUBLE ,WALL SECONDARY CONTAINM ~ NT PIPING ~''~'~'~,~ Fiberglass Pipe for underground "'handling-of petroleum products YOUR ADVANTAGES WITH UL LISTED RED THREAD PRODUCT PIPE LINES- EXCEPTIONAL CORROSION RESISTANCE-- UL Labeled (listed) RED THREAD TT pipe is corrosion resistant to gasoline, kerosene, jet fuel, natural gas (high H2S content), saltwater, corrosive soil and atmospheric conditions. A. O. Smith-Inland testing shows that RED THREAD 13 piping can also be used for conveying varying concentrations of ethanol and methanol-- consult THERMOSETTING PROPERTIES -- RED THREAD 13 pipe is made with a thermosetting epoxy resin. This means it - won't soften, cold-flow or balloon.., even at its maximum operating temperature of 150°F. HIGH PRESSURE TEMPERATURE RATING -- RED THREAD 13 pipe in 2 inch size has a cyclic operating pressure rating of 250 psi at 150°E HIGH FLOW CAPACITY-- RED THREAD rT pipe has a A. O. Smith-Inland On your .application. product being handled. ..................... greater ~ow capacity than manyother pipes with the same MAINTAINS PRODUCT PURITY-- RED THREAD 13 pipe, O.D. This is because its high-strength, fiberglass with its fiberglass and resin construction, is inert to construction provides a smoother I.D. and can provide,_a . petroleum fuels, assuring freedom from contamination ip the ...... larger I.D, for specified pressures.. ..THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY --The thermal conductivity of RED THREAD ]'[ pipe is only a fraction of that of steel LOW COEFFICIENT OF UNEAR EXPANSION -The coefficient of expansion of RED THREAD TT pipe is Ys to 1/s that of thermoplastic pipe, and only twice that of steel. QUALITY ASSURANCE--AIl UL Listed RED THREAD IT pipe is 100% hydrostatically mill tested (2' at 1000 psi; 3" and 4" at 675 psi) before the UL label is affixed. A further assurance of quality for you, exclusive in the industry, from A. O. Smith-inland Inc. FLEXIBILITY m A natural flexibility allows gradual bends to be made with RED THREAD ]1' pipe. It conforms easily to gradual ditch contours. EASY,' ECONOMICAL INSTALLATION -- Lightweight RED THREAD IT pipe is available in 15 and 30 foot random lengths. The easy-to-use T.A.B.'" Joint, standard on all UL RED THREAD rr pipe, promotes fast positive makeup and prevents "backout" problems dudng cure time. The combination of lightweight, flexibility and easy joining assures economical installation. A representative service station Installation of UL Listed Red Thread ~] product pipe lines and Red Thread ]~ double-wall secondary containment piping. INSTALLING UL LISTED RED THREAD PRODUCT PIPE LINES T.A.B. JOINING SYSTEM AND FITTINGS- This exclusive T.A.B. (Threaded and Bonded) Joint is factory installed. It is the standard joining system for UL Listed RED THREAD 17 pipe. Spigot and bonded-on couple ends are threaded with special profile double-lead threads. Combined with adhesive at time of assembly, T.A.B. Joint promotes positive makeup and prevents backout dudng cure. T.A.B. ends. Either factory-made T.A.B. spigots or field-made tapers may be joined with belled fittings. For proper tapering, ' carefully follow the operating instructions included with the tapering tool kit. JOINING PROCEDUREm -- 1. Clean spigot and coupled ends using the joint cleaner included in adhesive kit. After a surface is cleaned, do not touch or otherwise contaminate it Joint is fast and easy to use. with dirt. . .: ...~, ..-.. **~;..: .... · Compatible fittings are also listed by Underwriters' . ............... 2. Apply thoroughly mixed adhesive to both surfaces: :";)?";'~ '! nhoratodes for underground handling of petroleum 3. Insert the spigot into the coupled end using a turning ~ products. See back page for fittings conngura~Jons.- ....... motion.., joint must lock. ............... "'~"~ :~' ''~'~ ~" . HANDUNG AND STORAGE ~ RED THREAD 17 pipe is .... ADHESIVES ~The adhesive kits required for use in..;:!i:i',;-~?~'~'; .. - · packaged in compact bundles of four to eight lengths. ' ~ '" handling petroleum products are A. O. Smith-Inland :"~:gl~;~';':~;:i?,?':d':- - Bundles of RED THREAD n' pipe can be safely stored On """(=) These ' DS-7014, DS-7024, DS-7054, DS-7uo~. kits have a level ground or on racks with 10-foot (or less) support spacing. Reasonable care must be used in handling RED THREAD 1'[ pipe. Do not drop or throw RED THREAD ]7 pipe on the ground, or drop stones or other heavy objects on it. ' CUTTING(~) ~ RED THREAD 17 pipe is easily cut with an ordinary hacksaw, using a fine-toothed blade. For ease of tapering, the cut end should be square as possible. TAPERINGm -- When RED THREAD TI' pipe is cut to length'on the job site, the cut end must be retapered. The field tapedng tool pictured below is used for this purpose. Adaptable to two-, three-, and four-inch pipe, the tool quickly applies the proper taper by a shaving operation-- similar to a pencil sharpener. Plain unthreaded field-made tapers can be joined with factory installed threaded T.A.B. Joint coupled TOOL 25 minute working life at 75°F. However, curing time of {he adhesive on an assembled joint is dependent on the ambient temperature. Heat assist methods to shorten cure times are recommended for ambient temperatures below 70°F. A. O. Smith-Inland has developed two methods of supplying the necessary heat to bond pipe joints. For particulars, refer to the A. O. Sm~-Inland Installation Instructions. All adhesive kits contain epoxy resin and hardener in separate containers, joint cleaner, mixing stick, paint brush and paper towels. A detailed instruction sheet is included. Following these instructions will insure easy, fast assembly of RED THREAD17 pipe. (1) For additional Information on cutting, tapering and joining procedures refer to A. O. Smith-inland Installstlo~ Instructlotts. ~ Not reCOmmended fer most ~ 3' and 4' installations because of large quanflb/of adhesive per kit. INSTALLING UL LISTED RED THREAD · PRODUCT'PIPE LINES (continued) 'PLUMBING --To make installation easier and to conserve adhesive, all measuring, cutting, and tapedng should be done first. Then proceed with the bonding operation. To make sure measurements are dght, assemble the entire piping system "dry" (without adhesive) before bonding. Where accuracY is important, "dry" assembly is a must. For close tolerance piping refer to A. O. Smith-Inland Installation Manual No. 9474. FLEXIBLE HOSE CONNECTIONS -- Flexible hose connections can be installed in product and vent lines at the point where they leave the tank. On suction pump installation they can be put in just before the pump dser. Use of flexible connections can prevent breaking of lines or fittings where settlement might cause tank movement, or where expansion and contraction m~ght cause movement of the pipe. The drawings above of typical island piping indicate how connections can be made using standard RED. THREAD adapters. BURIAL-- Minimum acceptable burial depths are given in this section. In some cases greater depths may be required by the authority having jurisdiction or by local codes. The maximum allowable budal depth is 24 feet for burial in moderately compacted soils which do not contain clay and where the soil modulus is at least 1'000 psi. el RED THREAD II pipe is inherently flexible. APl Publication 1615 states: "Fiberglass piping, which is inherently flexible, does not require swing joints, if at least 4 feet of straight run is provided between any directional change exceeding 30°." Minimum budal depths shown in the above budal table are acceptable if, and only if, the'ditch width is 2.5 feet or less; the paved surfaces extend at least 2 feet on e'~her side ol the ditch; the fill matedal is clean sand or Ys" to Y~" pea gravel and 6" of the fill matedai is placed under the pipe as bedding material. Remaihing backfill above Sand or Pea Gravel amounts as shown in the last column of the burial table can be native soil if desired. If budal conditions other than those discussed above eXist, , contact A. O. Smith-Inland Inc. REPAIRING -- On rare occasions it may be necessary to repair a damaged section of RED THREAD 13 pipe. Where damage is in the form of a puncture,.the pipe can be repaired using a patch made from the pipe itself. If a considerable length of pipe is involved, it is best to replace it with a new section of pipe. Complete information for making . repairs is included in the A. O. Smith-Inland Inc. UL Installation Instructions Manual No. 1055. For industry reference, see APl Publication 1615 "Installation of Underground Petroleum Storage Systems", and PEI/RP100-86 ,Recommended Practices for Installation of Underground Uquid Storage Systems". UL LISTED RED THREAD]! FITTINGS o ~ELBOWS ' A -[' 45° ELBOWS tCJ~ E FLANGES Noednd A X(4) ~ s~ ' (h,..) (~n.) 2" 2~ .~ 1% ' 3" 3~ 1% ~ 4" 3~8 1~ Nondnal B C D E O X(4) p~.s~ze (In.) (',n.) Ch.) (in.) (in.) (in.) 2" 2~A 3/4 4sA Four 6 Holes 3" 2% 1~ 6 Four ~' Holes ~D 4"x 2% 1 ~ 7~ Eight 9 .1 Holes TEES ~ A X(4) p~p. Stz. (in.) (In.) 2" 3~ 3" 4~ 1% 4" 51/a 1~/~ CROSSES Nominal A X(4) Pipe Slae (In.) (In.) 2" 3~ 3" 4% 1% 4" 5~ SLEEVE COUPLING N~mlnal A . X(4) Pipe S~ze ' (In.) (In.) 2" · 7 r 2% 3'' 7 33A 4" 81A 4¥8 NIPPLES Noeflna] Overall Length 'A" Pipe Size 4' 6' 8' 10' 12' 2" ., v, ,/ v, 3" -- v' v' ~/ 4" -- ~/ v' ~' Available from stock · / Available from stock (4) X dimension is a nominal make up dimension for drawing layout only. Do not use for assembly dimensions. UL LISTED'RED THREAD I! FITTINGS Reduca, A X(4) S~ 0-.) 2"x1" I"A 2- x I~A'' 2 2,, x 1~" 1~ .4" x 3" 2% 1~8 -' '" ~ ~' ~ .......~"-~:~ .... REDUCER RUSHINGS (~, . - _ . (t) Reduced edening has fm NPT thre~l .... CAP 2" NPT THREAO NPT THREAD THREAD ~NPT THREAD THREADED ADAPTER THREADED ADAP i r.~ THRt=a_n__K__ft P_CLL & MALE N.P.T. T:I, ,, ,~ ~,-AD SPIGOT & ~ NJ).T. THREAD _R~'IL & FEMALE N.P.T. THREAD SP~iOT & FEMALE N.P.T. THREAD I=tpe S~e (In.) (~.) , (~,.) ~ ske On.) (~n.) ~ ske (tn.) (~n.) Prim Size (In.) (In.) 2" 4'A 2 I"A 2" . 3~ 2 2" 3'/~ 1% 2" 3¥8 2~ 3" 5Y~ 3 1% 3" 4~ 3 3" 4Y~ 1~ 3" 4¥4 3Ys ,, 4..___:__" s____~ 4~ ~,= 4'.__:_._' 4,/s~ ·4 4- 'UL LISTED RED THREAD I! PIPE... General Specifications and Rating<S, Nominal Mill Test<~) Max. Ra~ng PSJ it R~ N~ ~ W~ N~ · O.D. * LD. ~m W~M ~T~ Preesum 0~) ~_/FL) ~ ;4~ (PSI) ~* F 1~' F (FL) 2.375 2235 0.070 0.4 250 psi ~ 150"F 1~- 1[~ ' ~.5~ ~.~ o.o~o o.s ~s ~, e (4) X dimension is a nominal make up dlmensio~t for drawing layout only, Do not use for assembly dimensions, (5) All values except pressura-tempemtura maximum rating are nominal values, Tolerances or maximum/minimum limits can be obtained from A, O. Smith-inland Inc, (6) 100% hydrostatically tested at indicated pressure, UL LISTED RED THREAD I! PIPE ,(" Typical.Physical Prope ies · at75*F 11,900p~~ ASTMD-2105 at 150' F ' 9,300 f~ CompmssiveS~*~Axi~ ' . . . . ........ :.. ~ · . . Medutu~ o~ Eiaslic~y in Tension at 75" F : 1 ]2 x 10~ psi ~ ASTM 0-2105' at 150° F ......... _1A8 x_10~ pM ...... A~,-age at 75" F . 44,000 emi ~ ASTM D-1599 .... ' CycacPres~um(Isox~o'cycie~ _ ..: .. · .TS.F ............. ~o,~ - ~ L~°.~ at 150' F * ' - - 7,750 p~i P~:~eclum A .2" 3" 4' pipe 1.09 x 10'4 In.lln·leF ~' AOSJ-TM16-3 - .T'nmmal Conm.,cev~ 2' 3' 4' pipe 2.9 BTU/(Ft.a )(Hr.,~F/In.) AO~-TM16-15 Flow Factor . Hazen-W;!~ Coefllc~nt 150 AO~ bending properties of Red Thread II pipe Minimum NominM Bef~dlng Radlul(~) 3" '-80It 4" "-'100ft. :. - ' (7) Tests mn on pipe samples. (8) Sharper bends should be eliminated to avoid stress concentration which would result in premature pipe failure under pressure conditions. RED THREAD I! DOUBLE-WALL SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PIPING The newest and best Secondary Con- tainment system is now available from A. O. Smith-Inland Inc., the primary supplier of fiberglass reinforced ep- oxy Service Station piping. This field-proven system is available with all of the fittings necessary to. pro- vide a contamination-free system. The new A, O. Smith-Inland Second- ary Containment system uses RED THREAD ]3 pipe, and spedal two- piece r~ngs* as the outer protection shell for UL Listed RED THREAD TI' product pipe lines. Secondary Containment lines are one size larger than product lines and are available in 3," 4" and 6". sizes for the 2," 3" and 4" UL Listed product piping system. *Patent Pending o INSTALLING' RED THREAD [! SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PIPING SeCOndary Containment fittings utilize plain-end pipe which has been thoroughly sanded to remove all surface gloss. For installation, Secondary Containment pipe should be positioned over product pipe prior to bending the product piping. After testing the product pipe, the Containment fittings should be assembled; the Containment system may then be tested. RED THREAD [[ double-wail Secondary containment systems can be pressure tested and continuously monitored. For additional informatiOn, request A. O. Smith-Inland Manual No. 1190 for details on the installation of RED' THREAD 1~ Secondary Containment systems. RED THREAD ]Z DOUBLE-WALL SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. FITTINGS Secondary Containment fittings available from A. O. Smith-Inland include 90° elbews~ 45° elbows, tees, ~. couplings and termination concentric reducers. . ~ TEE TERMINATION CONCENTRIC REDUCER 90~ ELBOW · ' Two-piece Secondary containmen.t .fi?Jnos 'am ~m,-bled.. _~ .with standard bolts, nuts and fiat wasners a~ng ~.~:~?::. ~ 45° ELBOW i SLEEVE COUPLING i TERMINATION CONCENTRIC REDUCER WITH 3/4' NPT 3/4' NPT TAP TYPICAL. CROSS SECTION A B C D E F Size ± 1/.- .,- 1/.- ± 1/8" ~_ Va" ± ~A' - %" 3" 6 7 14 3 21/t 2Va 4- 7Va 8 14 3 I 3 2~/; 6" 8 9 16 4 4 3 A. O. SMITH-INLAND INC. 2700 WEST 65th STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72209 AREA CODE 501-568-4010 'WVX 910-722-7377 O. Sl It is the policy of A. O. Smith-Inland Inc. to improve its products continually. In accord with that policy, the right is reserved to make changes in sl~cilications, descriptions and illustrative material contained in this bulletin as conditions warrant. The information in this bulletin does not constitute a stated or implied guarantee. FlOat Vent Valves The OPW 53-V Series Float Vent Valves are designed to be installed in OPW 233-V Series extractor fittings to form a system to help prevent under- ground tank overfill, and reduce prod- uct mixing. The OPW~'53-V Series Float Vent Valves have a stainless steel ball which seats tightly against a specially designed valve seat, cuffing off the flow of vapors to the Stage I vapor recovery system, or the tank vent. These valves are superior to other 'Valves because of the stainless steel ball float and specially designed Duragard'" coated seat which helps .* eliminate valve hang up due to ........... corrosion. .'~ *. . - ' , Dimensions in Inches A Overall Length B Max. Width (Two Places) C Hole Size D Nipple Length E Hole Center To End Opw® Float Vent Valves are Covered Under Patent No.3,736,950 _" . j 2"NPT- .,. C D B " 2" Diameter ~ Ball Dimensions Product No. A B C D E Weight and Suffix Lbs. 53-VM Used as an integral part of the OPW overfill system to slow down the[Iow of liquid into the storage tank, and provide an overfill warning to the operator. 53-VM-0060 10 ~3/lS 3 1/16 61/s 11/2 2.16 (Calibrated) 53-VML Same as 53-VM but 12" D dimension, for double wall tanks. 53-VML-0120 16~A6 3 IA6 (Calibrated) 12 11/2 3.99 53-VSS Used to minimize product mixing when vent lines are manifolded underground. 53-VSS-0065 913/16 3 1/8 51~. 1'1/2 1.80 53-VTS Similar to 53-VSS Except vent bleed hole is only 1As". 53-VSS-0070 9 ~3A 6 3 !/16 51/6 11/2 1.90 53-FC Used only on vapor return line has no bleed hole. 53-FC-0046 727/32 3 NONE 3¥32 N/A 1.23' ¸17 Fill Accessories Fill Boxes OPW offers fill boxes for use where it is desirable to con- nect the underground tank fill line directly to the surface without manhole enclosures. 22-0033 122-0055 22-0077 OPW 122 OPW 122 is a quick'Opening Fill Box with an inner cap which can be locked. The inner cap is a screw-on type. This Fill Box is quick opening and closing. Tapered slots in the outer cover engage pins in the body to give a quick, tight seal. A deep well around the inner cap keeps liquid out of the fillpipe. (The lock shown in the illustration is not included with the assembly.) Materials Body and cover: cast iron Inner cap: bronze Gaskets: chrome tanned leather SIZES: 2"WT. 11.17 3"WT. 15.49 4"WT. 22.37. · installations. The rugged body is built t° withstand heavy ddveway traffic. Materials Body: cast iron Cover: bronze SIZES: 2" WT. 2.62 3"WT. 5.58 4" WT. 8.63 176-0033 176-0055 176-0077 Fill Caps OPW 83 The OPW 83 is a Iockable screw-on Fill Cap. Threads are standard pipe size. A ga. sket assures a tight seal against air and water, and a lug on the body has two drilled holesi one for locking purposes, the Other for a wire seal. Materials Body: bronze Cap: cast iron Gasket: chromed tanned leather SIZES: 2"WT. 2.46 83-0022 3"WT. 4.34 83-0044 4".WT. 7.80 83-0066 0PW'116 The OPW 116 is normally used as a screw-on Pipe Cap for extractor assemblies. It has a raised cross bar for easy installation and removal. Threads are standard female pipe 'threads. Materials Body: die cast zinc Cross bar: cadmium plated steel SIZES: 3" WT, .55 116-0044 4" WT. 1.45 116-0066 26 OPW 126-B The OPW 126-B Fill Cap Assembly consists of a cast iron collar and a bronze cap. The 2" and 3" sizes have replaceable threads, and a lock type cap. (The lock shown in the illustration is not included with the assembly.) Materials Collar: cast iron Cap: bronze Thread insert, 2" and 3" sizes only: bronze Gasket: 'chromed tanned leather SIZES: 2" WT. 2.98 126-B-2033 3" VV~T'. 4.55 126-B-2055 4" WT. 8.56 126-B-2077 Drop Tubes OPW 61.T The OPW 61-T Drop Tube is.inserted in the underground storage tank riser pipe to permit the efficient delivery of fuel. Delivery is speeded and less vapor is generated with submerged fil- ling using the. OPW 61 -T. The OPW 61 - 61T-7244 T is flared at the upper end and rests on top of {he fill pipe, the oPW tight 61T-7266 fill adaptor screws into the riser, hold- 61T-7268 lng the drop tube in place. The bottom . . 61T-7368 . of the 61-T is fumished cut straight, but is generally cut to length on the job-site Dimensions Product No. Riser Pipe &Suffix Size Length Wt. 3" 10' 3.14 4" 10' 5.12 4" 12' 6.18 4" VaPor Vents OPW 23 The OPW 23 Vent has an aluminum body and a 40-mesh brass screen. The OPW 23 is an open vent and directs Vapors upward in accordance with. NFPA Code 30. Set screws make in- stallation easy. Available in 11/2", 2" and 3" sizes. OPW 523 The OPW 523 Pressure Vacuum Vent is an upward vapor discharge vent and is available with an 8 oz. pressure set- ting and a 1/2 oz. vacuum setting. The 523 is available in 2" size, and is attached to the 2" threaded vent pipe. OPW 523.S The OPW 523-S Pressure Vacuum Vent is similar to the 523 above, except it is attached to the vent line with set screws rather than pipe threads. A gasket is provided. Available in 2" size. The rated maximum flow pressure drop for all OPW 523 Vents is 28 oz. per'square inch at 7000 SCFH. OPW 23 Dimensions Product No. & Suffix Size Wt. 23-0044 11/2" 0.27 23-0033 2" 0.23 23-0055 3" 1.02 523-1100 2" 0.85 523-S-1150 2" 0..88 OPW 523, Specification GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS~'DOUBLE WALL FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS · SHORT FORM: The contractor shall provide Double Wall Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) U.L. labeled underground storage tanks as shown on the drawings. Sizes and fittings shall be as shown. The tanks shall be Century-Cast' Tanks as manufactured by XERXES CORPORATION. Tanks shall be tested and installed with pea gravel or crushed stone as specified in the current installation instructions provided with the tank. LoNG FORM: Section 15177;1 ~ .. Part I General 1.01 Related Work Specified in Other Sections A; Liquid Level Gauges: Section 15174 B. Plastic Pipe: Section 15064 3. Tanks shall be capable of storing gasoline or gasohol (1096 ethanol and 90% gasoline mixture), jet fuel,'diesel fuel, AV gas, potable water at ambient underground temperature or fuel oil at temperatures not to exceed 150° F. C. Each tank shall be ~-~luipped with two 22" I.D. manways. Each steel manway cover shall have three 4" NPT fittings welded in place. D. Materials: 1. Tanks (Primary and Secondary) shall be manufactured with 100O/o isophthaiic pelyester resin and glass fiber reinforcement with no sand fillers. 1. Tank shall have a space between the pdmary and secondary shell walls to allow for the free flow and containment of all leaked product from the primary tank. Space also allows the insertion of C. Anchor Bolts: Section 05501 ...... . a monitoring.device through a monitoring ~ting. : ~..., ~,;,.: .: ': :.i D. Cast-rn-Placa Concrete: Section 03300 ' ' F. Tank Dimensions (Refer to Xerxes literature on gailonage:i ' 1.02 Quality. Assurance .... · ':- -~ ' ' ' 1. Tank shall have nominal capacity of "gallons. feet..-.: ~: i:. ~..',:_;.:: . A, Acceptable Manufacturer: XERXES CORPORATlON ~ . 2. Tank shail have nominal outside dlameter :~"~eet..~ B. Governing Standards; pdmary tank 3. Tank shall have approximate overall length of 1. ASTM standard document number 04021-81. .- - . 2,02, Accessories J.'.-.-: ....:. -:.-:~.~:~-.::." i/:,::;.',~.;~ ~!:~?~'i~¢?;~::.~:~,;.:?!.:::~:;:~.'.~,?: -',-. ..... 2. ' Underwriters Laboratories, lnc. (U.L.) File MH 9061(N) for ' -?: A. 'AnchorStraps--Pr~ovideFRPanchorstmpaasmanufa~uradbytank ~.~?~!~,:~i,~.:: - ' * ,:. -.~. storage of flammable liquids. A U.L certification plate shall be ...... :. ~:.-:: attached to each tank, ........ . ......... :' -.manufacturer. Number and locafion of stmpa shall be specified in current nsta lat on instructions of tank manufacturer. 3. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA30) Flammable and :~.;~;,~,~,:~- ',, Combustible Liquids Code and (NFPA31) Standard for Installation of Oil Burning Equipment. 4.National Sanitation Foundation, Standard 14. 5.Factory Mutual Systems approval J.I. 1G4A0~F. 6.Military Specifications No. MIL-T-52777 (A). C. Governing Standards; secondary tank: 1. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (U.L.) File MH 9061 (N) for storage of flammable liquids. A U.L. certification plate shall be attached to each tank. 2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA30) Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code and (NFPA31) Standard for IhstallatJon of Oil Burning Equipment. 1.03 Submittals A. Shop Drawings: Contractor shall submit copies of shop drawings for each tank. Drawings shall show locations of all fittings, accessories, and cdtical dimensions. B. Catalog Data: Contractor shall submit copies of manufac- turer's literature to include copies of manufacturer's current installation instructions. Part II Products 2.01 Double Wall Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Underground Storage Tanks with a Primary (internal) tank and a Secondary (exter- nal) tank. A. Loading Conditions--Tank shall meet the following'design criteria: 1. Internal load: Primary and Secondary tanks shall w.ithstand 5 psi air pressure test.with 5 to I safety factor. Contractor shall . individually test tanks prior to installation as this is to test for leakage. Maximum test pressure is 5 psi. 2. Vacuum Test: Every tank shall be mercury 'vacuum tested by the tank manufacturer to assure structural integrity. Primary tank shall be tested to 11.5 inches and secondary tank tested to 9.5 inches mercury vacuum. 3. Suriace Loads: Tank shall withstand surface H-20 axle loads when properly installed according to current manufacturer's installation instructions. 4. External hydrostatic pressure: Buri;d in ground with 7' of over- burden over the top of the tank, the hole fully flooded and a safety factor of 7:1 against general buckling. 5. Tanks shall support accessory equipment such as heating coils, drop tubes, submersible pumps, ladders when installed accord- ing t~tank manufacturer's recommendations and limitations. B. Product Storage: 1. Tanks shall be capable of storing petroleum with specific gravity up tO 1.1~ 2. Both pdmary and secondary tanks shall be individually vented to atmospheric pressure. The tanks are not designed as pressure vessels. 1. All manways to be flanged and 22' I.D. complete with U.L listed gaskets, bolts and covers. (30" I.D. manway is also available.) · · 2, Location as shown on drawings. 3. Manway extension tubes shall be FRP and 24" long for manways shown on drawings. 4. Each steel manway cover shall have three--4" NPT fittings welded in place. ..' · 'ill Tubes 1. Tubes shall be FRP and factorY installod by manufacturer. ...... 2. Location as shown on drawing. 3. Tubes shall be 4" diameter with 6~ steel fitting and a 6" x4" dou- · - ble tapped reducer bushing. Gauge Plates -- Shall be installed at location shown on drawing. Heating Coils 1. Heating Coils shall be installed in a s~parata 22" manways and shall be standard items supplied by tank manufacturer. 2. Location as shown on drawings. NPT Threaded Fittings 1. All threaded fittings shall be a material of construction consistent with the requirements of U.L. label. 2. All standard thread fittings shall be half couplings and shall be 4" in diameter. Reducers are to be used for smaller sizes where shown and provided by contractor. 3. Sizes Standard Other Sizes Fill 4" Gauge 4" Inlet 4" · Outlet 4" Vent 4" 4. Suction Line--Shall be installed by contractor on site. Pipes shall terminate a minimum of 4" from bottom of tank. 5. Return line shall be installed by contractor. Monitor Fittings 1. Tank shall have two test monitor fittings consisting of a 2" NPT fitting on the pdmary tank and a 6" NPT fitting directly above on the secondary tank. 2. Tank shall have two monitor fittings, one near each end of the tank. XERXES® CORPORA~ON · . 19 GARY J. WICKS .~,gency Director .(805) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY Director September ?, 1989 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone (805) 861-3636 Telecopler (805) 861-3429 AGENCY Thorne Environmental 4570 California Avenue, Suite 200. Bakersfield, 'CA 93309 ATTN: SUBJECT: Barbara Minette Union Cemetery, ?00 Potomoc, Bakersfield,.Caiifornia PERMIT # 210004 Dear Ms. Minette: In reviewing your response to the additional requirements on the site characterization and remediation for the subject site, the following are our comments: The'rationale for choosing "100 ppm TPH" clean-up level must be provided· Please specify if that concentration is the average, not to exceed, or cumulative value. For: a proposed cleanhup level 'to be acceptable, it must be .demonstrated that such levels of contamination do not pose a threat to public health and the environment. Regarding the extraction rate and time calculations, the "100" is the average molecular weight of gasoline which can have the units of lb/mole. The molar volume of gas must be ad3usted to operating pressure and temperature. Since the calculated extraction rate and time are just aooroximate values recalculation will not make much of. a difference, therefore it is not necessary to resubmit this information· We noted an error in the mathematics of the radius of .influence in re/rw = x x re = r~ex not rw ~ Calculating, the radius (re) is not 48 feet. Please resubmit the correct'caiculations when you apply for the vapor extraction well permit. o Thorne Environmental Page Two September ?, 1989 Items #1 and #S must be resolved before implementation of the workplan. If you have any questions, pl.ease call me at (805) 861- 3636. Sincerely, Dolores Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Management Program DG:jg cc: Frank Dobesh, Union Cemetery GARY J. WICKS Agency Director (805) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY o,,~,o, REsoURCE DEPAR'I~ ~~ME"TAL 2700 M Street, Suite Bakerefleld, CA 93301 Telephone (805).861-3636 Telecoplef (805) 861-3429 AGENCY Frank Dobesh Union CemeterY'Association P.O, Box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93305 June 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Location 700 Potomac Avenue, Bakersfield, CA. Known As : Union Cemetery Permit # : 210004 Dear Mr. Oobesh: This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the provision that the info.rmation provided to this agency was accurate and representative of e~isting conditions, it is' the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations'at the site. Nor does it relieve you of the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality or public health. Additionally, be advised that'changes in thepresent or prOposed use of the site may require further site characterization, and mitigation activity. It i's the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings,, or site usage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Gough at (805) 86)-3636. · ' er y, , £n¥ironmental Sea]th Services Department CB:cd cc: Trent Rosenlieb, Thorne Environmental K F--__ i~.N ¢OUN T'Y RgSOURC-F-- i'~lA N A G £ 1~'1 £ N T ~:, ,,' ' .; ';~,~ ~::" 'ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT .-' ,~J-?~"-,' ~.?~'~:~ :~70'0 "M".STR~,, SUITE 300, BAKERSFIELD,~ 93301 ]~' '' "::'- -~"':"L~'.,"::~ UNDERGR0bNO HAZARDOUs SUBSTANCE STORAGE FACILITY " "'", .--" >"~,y~?.,;"-~.>-":'~?' .7 '-.:~'.;' * INSPECTION REPORT' -. ....'.'- ,'..Let' . -~:'- -':-:','* :""-' ':"~:--'~:', '" ~'*.' .... -' ~-¢ d.' ' '.. " ,/ '::';7%>Y-:".4 :..": ..... '/' "' -//' * "':' ........ '"' ..... ' .P~RM TIME IN' 0..~0 TIME OUT ,~ ....... · NUMBER OF .. P~RM,~ST~ YES ........ :_.]]"] ~ ............. i'DSPE.C.TION DATE:.,],:.2,~Z~,~,I.,.....L'::;'? ;,TYPE' OF ~NSPECTION: ROUTINE_.__~ .......... REINSPECTION · '- COMPLAINT". FACILITY NAHE:UN[ON OEHETERY '-:."'-':'.'"?: : ..... ...' ' :-'- .: ..... .."FAC[LZTY ADDRESS:?00 ~OTO~AC AVENUE -'-' , -. ' "" ,', :,0WN ~s. ,"hX~E: UN"I Oh:-'O:EMET ERY -ASSOC.{:':: .: ~.: ~_::::.;-. ,,::,~.:-:-:~- .... ::.:,~.;::- . [ -OPERATORS *NAME: FRANK 'DOBESH -' . ' · ' ~-";~--%L.~%' "" ~'-,.. ............ a.- ,:.Intercepting an dtr~ting system·-,; ....... ,, ' .... : ..... '. , ' ~ ~ .... "' ~. Modified [nventory Control ..... .- ...... .: .' ..... :~=--.c:;--.* ...... -...:- ' .. d. In-cank Level Sensing Device · ~ e. Groundwater ~nitoring -- 'f, iVad~e Zone ~n~toring . ~i(_~SECONDARY'CO~TAINMENT MONITORING: a. Linen b. Oouble-~aTled tank ' - c..':Vault" ~".~HPING ~ONITORING: a. Pnessurized ~ Suction c. :Gravity OVERFILL PROTECTION: TIGHT?SS TESING: ~]) NEW~-'~ONSfRUCTION/MODI FICATIONS ~)CLOSURE/ABANDONMENT' ~UNAUTHORI~D RELEASE g. NAINTENANCE, 6ENERAL SAFETY, AND OPERATING CONDITION OF FACILITY · " ........... rKERNi iUNTY AIR POLLUTION cONTROl · 2700 "M" Street, ,~,,,,~;;~*e 275 '~" ~/~ /~,,' '-. ,.,Phone-. ~ Z ~, -* ~ ~ . ~.?-'.:~ Date., ....-.. -, . ~ , . ~ , . .. MISSING;VAPOR 9. 10. 12. 13. 15. · BROKEN CAM LOCK ON VAPOR CAP FILL CAPS NOT PROPERLY SEATED GASKET MISSING FROM VAPOR CAP FILL ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT . VAPOR ADAPTOR NOT TIGHT .. GASKET 'BETWEEN ADAPTOR & FILL TUBE MISSING / IMPROPERLY SEATED DRY BREAK GASKETS DETERIORATED EXCESSIVE VERTICAL PLAY IN COAXIAL FILL TUBE COAXIAL FILL TUBE SPRING ,/,, MECHANISM DEFECTIVE TANK DEPTH MEASUREMENT 17. TUBE LENGTH MEASUREMENT 18. DIFFERENCE (SHOULD BE 6" OR LESS) 19. OTHER. .:- COMMENTS: ..2 ~' WARNING: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A CHECK ABOVE ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE(S) 209, 412 AND/OR 412.1. THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH &'SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES ..' OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION. TELEPHONE (805)861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLU- ~ TION OF THE VIOLATION(S) 9149-1010 APCD FILE ~'~ ' "~"'" " "~'""" -'- ' ' ..... ~ ........ . "~" '~':'~ ' ;-'-!:~'!'":'1. :CERT. NOZZLE :i:?' :? ::~..:;:- :i~:!~:' '::':i~'J~'' '~': i!i;?~:,.: %:-.t:'~. _?:~?':-:~:~~:~ !ii'¢!:i~ :'~-:~4~?:~ ;:~i~...~,~. ~. ~'~:~'~..~_.. :. ~t~_~ .,~ Z 4. RING, RIVET ' E 5. BELOWS .:':' -' . 6. SWIVEL(S) ':: :' .... :'"" '~:':'; ':'~'~::' ': ?¥; ';~::'~ "~;~ '~::~% . 7. ' FLOW UMITER EW) ' :: - ?:' " ' :if: k .~:.. .:;;~..~:,.: :::.''- ..... c~t ' ~"~"' -':-~. .... ~'~;~:;: :'~¢~;~... 1. ·HOSE CONDITION P .................. . ..... -, ....... O 3. CONFIGU~TION R :'.. 4. SWIVEL O 5. OVERH~D RETRACTOR S E 6. POWER/PI~OT ON 7. SIGNS POSTED Key to system ~pes: Key to deficiencies: NC= not ce~ified, ~ broken ... BA=Balance HE ;Healey M= missing, TO= lorn, F= flat, ' · ~= t~t~ ..... · . RJ=Red Jacket CH=Gulf Hasselmann AD= needs adjustment, L= long, LO= loose, ' · ~-... HI =Hi~ HA =Hasstech S= shod MA= misaligned, K= kink~, .~ FR= Eayed. ** INSPECTION RESULTS ** Key to inspection results: ' Blank= OK, 7= Repair within seven days, T= Tagged (nozzle tagged out-of-order until repaired) · - U= Taggable violation but left in use. . .:..~.. . . .:~:.~.: COMMENTS: '~)'z~ P/~ ....,'; "'7'-7"~ ~ //,---z'~' ~ ./¢~ ~-~' '?~:~<~'~ ~ VIOLATIONS: SYSTEMS MARKED WITH A "T OR U" CODE IN INSPECTION RESULTS~. ARE IN VIOLATION OF KERN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT RULE(S) 412 AND/OR 412.1. ' THE CAUFORNIA~ HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SPECIFIES PENALTIES OF UP TO $1,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH DAY OF VIOLATION.. TELEPHONE (805). 861-3682 CONCERNING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE VIOLATION. ' ' ...... ":." ':':' ....... ~'~ "' NOTE: cALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY· CODE SECTION 41960.2, REQUIRES THAT. THE ABOVE USTED 7-DAY DEFICIENCIES ·. " BE CORRECTED WITHIN ,7 DAYS. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION' . ' ... ...... :': ...... : .... - .....Z T': .......... ": ...... . .... GARY J. WICKS Agency Director (805) 861-3502 STEVE McCALLEY Director C ~:E N T .,sou. E . DEPART,~MENTAL Frank Dobesh Union Cemetery Association P.O.'Box 3066 Bakersfield, CA 93305 SUBJECT: Location : Known As : Permit # : June 18, 1990 700 Potomac Avenue, Bakersfield, CA Union Cemetery 210004 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield. CA 93301 Telephone (805) 661-3636 Telecopler (805) 861-3429 AGENCY Dear Mr. Dobesh: Thi.s letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action at the above site. With the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of existing conditions, it is the position of this office that no further action is required at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any liability under the California Health and Safety Code or Water Code for past, present, or future operations at the site. Nor does it relieve you of. the responsibility to clean up existing, additional, or previously unidentified conditions at the site which cause or threaten to cause pollution or nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to water quality'or public health. Additionally, be advised that changes in the present or proposed use of the site may require further site characterization and mitigation activity. It is the property owner's responsibility to notify this agency of any changes in report content, future contamination findings, or site usage. If you have'any questions regarding this matter, please contact Dolores Gough at (805) 8~-3636. , ' gram Manager Environmental Health Services Department CB:cd cc: Trent Rosenlieb, Thorne Environmental FINDINGS PRESENTED TO: uNION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION SUBMITFED BY: THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL DECEMBER, 1989 12/89 3E-1032.003 ENVIRONMENTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Executive Summary 1 3.2 Soil Stapling ~d Field Scree~ng 3 3.3 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Installation of Vapor Extraction Wells Analytical Results Site Geology and GroUndwater Conclusions Recommendations 3 4 5 5 5 8.0 9.0 Limitations Signatures 6 6 Exhibits Tables Appendix A Appendix B Boring Logs Analytical Results 4** 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL In May, 1989, Union Cemetery contracted with Thorne Environmental to perform a site characterization and install a vapor extraction system .at their facility located at 700 Potomac Street in Bakersfield, California (Exhibit 1). The characterization focused on the area where a 500-gallon underground leaded gaSoline storage tank, dispenser and associated piping had previously been removed. Soil samples collected during.the tank removal, were analyzed and indicated impaction had occurred. Subsequent site assessments conducted by three environmental consulting fu'ms described the lateral extent of impaction but failed to adequately evaluate the vertical extent of the affected soil.: ' Thorne Environmental's site characterization and field activities included three soil '~ borings, soil sampling, laboratory analyses for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)'as -gasoline, the volatile aromatic constituents benZene, .... (BTXE), and total lead. "~i : : ' ~ ." ~:7'''-' ~.':": ' :~."::'Field sCreening of soil .samples indicated that soft ~mpact~on extended deeper .than ~as previously described. Approximately 65 feet of vadose zone impaction~as Two vapor extraction wells were installed to remediate the soil.'~ ' .... ;": '"~" ': "-~ Between October 25-30, 1989, a total of 39 soil samples were submitted to National Toxicology Laboratories (NTL), a California State certified laboratory, with representative samples analyzed for TPH, BTXE and total lead using EPA Methods 8015 (modified for gasoline), 8020 and 6010 respectively. Analytical results from boring VE-1 indicated a maximum concentration of TPH as gaSoline of 1,200 ppm at 50 feet in depth beneath the former tank location. Detectable TPH was 4 ppm at 95 feet in depth. Total lead was detected in the four samples at concentrations ranging from 6.1-6.9 ppm. The analytical results imply that the lateral and vertical extent of impaction have been described. The affected soil ap'pears to approximate the shape of a cylinder 75 feet in depth with a 10-foot radius. The site soil profile consists of 'clayey and silty sand with interbedded layers of silt and clay. Depth' to the water table at the site is estimated at 200 feet (Kern County Water Agency, "Water Supply Report 1987"). · The .site Characteristics observed at Union Cemetery produce a score of 50 points using the LUFT Manual gasoline leaching potential risk analysis. This score corresponds to recommended maximum allowable concentrations of TPH and BTXE of 1000, 1, 50, 50 and 50 ppm respectively. Thorne Environmental recommends abandonment in place upon approval by the Kern County Department of Environmental Health. 12/89 3E-1032.003 ENVIRONMENTAL 2.0 FACILITY HISTORY AND PROJECT BACKGROUND Union Cemetery retained Wegener Construction to remove a 500-gallon leaded gasoline underground storage tank in 1986 from their Potomac Street facility. Evidence of gasoline impaction was reportedly discovered when the tank was excavated. In September-October, 1986, B.C. Laboratories investigated the site and advanced six soil borings with 19 soil samples analyzed for TPH as. gasoline and BTXE.. Concentrations. of TPH ranged from non-detected (ND) to 18,900 ppm at 20 feet. ;... In January, 198 , Soils Engineering, Inc. (SEI) conducted a s~te assessment including three soil borings and soil sampling. Analytical results of seven samples~i'mdicated · ' D t 4 500 m at 30 feet. . .... .., ~ ...... ~:.~.~?~ -~:~"~;~'.~ ... , . . ';.~: '-- ~. ' ,~;:-~., '. "· .' ' ~ '~.~ -.;:. *~,£':~- :, .5' ~' ~-::~h:,':~:;'.!~,;, '-~: · The s~te assessments conducted by B.C.-Laboratories and SEI tmplied that impaction had ocCUrred, however, the lateral and vertical extent were not fully evaluated. None of the borings drilled by B.C, Laboratories or SEI were advanced below a depth of 45 feet. The data collected by the two companies implied that gasoline impaction probably did not extend much below that depth. The recent field activities conducted by Thorne Environmental indicated that impaction was present below 45 feet. In May, 1987, Levine-Fricke, Inc. advanced one soil boring to a depth of 70 feet approximately fifteen feet east of the former underground tank location. Analytical results of soil samples collected from this boring indicated no TPH present above detection limits. In May, 1989, Union Cemetery retained Thorne Environmental to conduct a site assessment evaluating the extent of impaction and to implement a vapor extraction system to remediate the soil. 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES The assessment activities consisted of the following: Advancement of three (3) investigative soil borings; Soil sampling at 5-foot intervals in the borings, field screening for hydrocarbon vapors and. lithologic descriptions; 12/89 3E-1032.003 Installation of two (2) vapor extraction wells; Laboratory analyses of selected s°il samples for TPH using EPA Method 8015 (modified for gasoline), BTXE using EPA Method 8020, and total lead using EPA Method 6010. 2 3.1 SOIL BORINGS._. ENVIRONMENTAL In July, 1989, Thorne Environmental presented a workplan to Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services (County) to assess the eXtent of soil impaction at the site and install a vapor extraction system. After County approval of the workplan Thorne Environmental began field activities. On October 25, 1989, work commenced on the first of three soil borings. Locations of the borings are shown on Exhibit 2 and are denoted VE-1, VE-2 and T-1 with depths of 95 feet, 50 feet and 50 feet respectively. The borings were advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 rig with 8-inch .hollow-stem continuous flight augers in accordance with ASTM Method D .1452-80 for ..soil investigations and sampling by auger .borings. 'The 'augers were steam' 'cleaned prior"to ;' ,drilling each boring. All cuttings from the borings were placed in.55-gallon,..dr~!ms' -'left on site for proper disposal pending analytical._ results.. '-~ :','-.3,2 SOIL SAMPLING AND FIELD SCREENING · ... , .,..' ... ~ ..," . .... . ..,._~,.,:z,,.~,ii..::' .:.: .... Soil samples were cOllected through the auger at 5-foot intervals in each boring. spoon sampler containing four 2-inch by &inch brass sleeves was driven into the soil by a 140-pound hammer with a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D 1586- 84 for split-barrel sampling of soil and D 1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler were cleaned with a low-phosphate detergent solution followed by immersion in tap water prior to each use. The blow counts and lithology were recorded on field boring logs, later integrated and output to computer-generated logs. Lithology was described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Copies of the logs and a key to the USCS are contained in Appendix A. One brass sleeve from each sample was sealed at each end with PVC end caps and tape, labeled, placed in an iced cooler and delivered to National Toxicology Laboratories in Bakersfield. A total of 39 soil samples were submitted under Chain-of-Custody procedures to ensure sample validity and traceability. Soil collected at each sample interval was placed in a mason jar to 50% capadty, shaken to disaggregate the grains and left undisturbed for 15 minutes. A headspace reading was obtained using a photoionization detector (PID), equiPped with a 10.0 eV lamp, and noted on the boring log. Boring T-1 was backfilled with a neat cement grout. 3.3 INSTALLATION OF VAPOR EXTRACTION WELLS.. Boring VE-1 was reamed to 80 feet with 10-inch augers and completed as a 4-inch diameter PVC vapor extraction well as shown on Exhibit 3. The boring was backfilled with #3 Monterey sand to a depth of 84 feet followed by a 4-foot layer of bentonite. 12/89 3F_,-1032.003 3 ... ' ENVIRONMENTAL Schedule 40 PVC casing was installed to a depth of 80 feet with the bottom 30 feet being 0.020 slotted. A filter pack of #3 Monterey sand extended 5 feet above the slotted interval with an overlying 5-foot bentonite seal. The annular space was filled with cement grout to one foot below surface. l' Field screening of the soil samples indicated that gasoline impaction was present below 50 feet. A second vapor extraction well was installed so that the slotted interval in a t single well would not exceed 35 feet in length. Boring VE-2 was completed as a vapor i-' extraction well as shown on Exhibit 4. A 3-foot layer of bentonite was placed in the ~ 'bottom of the boring. Casing was installed to a depth of 50 feet with the ·slotted interval ., ,:, -from 15-50 feet. A filter pack of #3 Monterey. sand extended 3 feet above the slotted :: '-~/,,, ' f.'!: :'~ :,., interval and was overlain by 5 feet of bentonite followed by 6 feet of cement grOut. :~:~ii~i~i!?.;~ "'"'-' : ':'" Installation of the cement in both wells was witnessed by 'a reiareSentative fif the CoUnty; !:~!iii!!i~(}'il ~ .... ,'~" ~': ' - . .... · '~ ' 7'~ i~ . "'.~ ": ' . ~ ~-~.' ~,. ~ · ~' .... -'-' .... '-'.-,,-.~ ~.? ~?:t'-;t':d,,'~.'~, ~.';~?~,2~7~x?..;5.~'~-'~?.c~;¢?~k~-c-?:~':~ [' '" 'All s°il samples were submitted to NTL dsT;~l~f ,tmh%geS~foPJe~jo~.~e,an~dyz~d02%O,r:F~oourH .;i~}:a;i!~:~: !.' as gasoline and BTXE using EPA Metho ( ' g ] · . .... ' ~-.'' of the 10 samples were analyzed for total lead using EPA Method 6010. l. Results of laboratory analyses of selected samples from ,the three borings are presented in the following table and are included in Appendix B along with assodated Chain-of- i Custody documents.- , ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12/89 3E-1032.003 Sample ~/ Boring/ Depth 02135 VE-1, 30' 02139 VE-i,' 50' 02144 VE-1, 75' 02148 VE-1, 95' 02152 VE-2, 20' 02155 VE-2, 35' 02158 VE-2, 50' 02163 T-l, 25' 02166 T-l, 40' 02168 T-l, 50' TPH as gasoline Benzene Toluene X¥1ene (ppm)' (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 830 1,200 4 28O 9 46 140 420 230 4 Eth¥1benzene Lead (ppm) (ppm) 36 24 6.1 0 · 001'4 NO 8.6 6.8 ND 0.027 9.'! 27 6.9 46 6.8 The laboratory results indicate gasoline impaction maY be present from 30-70 feet in VE- l, from 20-50 feet in VE-2 and from 25-50 feet in T-1. Concentrations of total lead ranging from 6.1-6.9 ppm were detected in the samples and are below the total threshold limit concentration (TrLC) of 1,000 ppm. Table 1 presents a LUFT Manual gasoline leaching potential risk analysis. The site characteristics observed at Union Cemetery indicate a score of 48 pointS. This corresponds to recommended maximum allowable concentrations of TPH as gasoline, benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene of 100, 0.3, 0.3, I and I ppm respectively. -This site exceeds LUFT recommended maximum concentrations of .TPH ~d .BTXE. ~.:~ii GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER .... ........ -,..~,.:~ .- .... :". The sedimenis underlying thee site are Quaternary' alluvial deposits' c0nsisting'"i~('¢if:~;.'-'~ ;'unconsolidated clays, silts, sands, ~gravels and cobbles' (California Division°f Mines and Geology, 1971). In VE-1, the'deepest of the borings, these recent sediments comprise a 95-foot section of clayey and silty sand with interbedded silt and clay layers. The depth to groundwater at this site is approximately 200 feet with regional flow to the southwest (Kern County Water Agency, "Water Supply Report 1987"). 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons as. gasoline and volatile aromatics were detected above LUFT recommended allowable levels in the three borings. The lateral and vertical extent of gasoline impaction were assessed and indicate that impacted soil may extend to 75 feet in depth beneath the former fuel tank location and outward in a 10. foot radius (Exhibit 5). Insignificant concentrations of 'total lead were detected. 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Thorne Environmental initially planned to implement a vapor extraction system at the site. However, current field activities indicate this is not warranted. Thorne Environmental recommends abandonment in place because of: 1) 2) 3) No threat to groundwater. Rapid natural reduction of contaminants. No threat to the public. 12/89 3E-1032.003 5 Thorne Environmental performed the aforementioned field activities in accordance with generally accepted standards of care which exist in Central California at this time. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic conditions is a difficult and inexact science. Judgments leading to conclusions and, recommendations are generally made with limited knowledge of the subsurface conditions, present. No' warranty, express or implied, is made. 9.0 SIGNATURES, This site characterization and vapor eXtraction well installation report was prepared by: Project Hydrogeologist This report was reviewed by: Trent R. Rosenlieb, P.E. Environmental Manager Date 12/89 3E-1032.003 6 Canall ~ T.285, R.281 SHL gERN R.29E. ~tJ:o T~- Bllter~4d GREENFIELD AQUATIO~ T.'2S. .-- 3 T.32S. R.2GE. ,27E. I la R..28E.: ~ DETAILED -' _ . -- j UNION CEMETERY J ~,~,~~j BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL LOCATION MAP POTOMAC STREET x x GRAVES GRASS 1st Approximate former location of underground storage tank ASPHALT LANE. 0 '10' I CHAIN-LINK FENCE × 3rd~ VE-2 B-3o &2nd VE'.~)'-I. ~ A,~ T..,1/ CARPORT TO OFFICE LF-~ LEGEND (~) THORNE vAPo~ ~I~X'TRACTION WELL · THORNE SOIL BORING O S.E.I. SOIL BORING · B.C. LAB SOIL BORING ~3 LEVINE-FRICKE SOIL BORING APPROXIMATE SCALE 1%10' I UNION CEMETERY I PROJECTNO.I EXHIBIT ~,,~'~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA , , ENVIEONMENTAL SITE MAP 3E.1032 2 SURFACE NOTTO SCALE TD 96~ UNION CEMETERY PROJECT NO EXHIBIT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL VE-1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3E-I 032 3 POTOMAC STREET CHAIN-LINK FENCE GRAVES GRASS underground storage tank ~ .... ~ ~ TO OFFICE CARPORT LF-~ APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOIL ASPHALT LANE, 0 10' l I APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"-,10' LEGEND (~) THORNE VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL. · THORNE SOIL BORING o S.E.I. SOIL BORING · B.C. LAB SOIL BORING r-t LEV1NE-FRICKE SOIL BORING UNION CEMETERY I PROJECTNO.,I EXHIBIT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I I TABLES UNION CEMETERY TABLE 1 LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS FOR GASOLINE USING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) MN'D BENZENE, TOLUENE, XYLENE AND ETHYLBENZENE (BTX&E) FEATURE 0 ~ CON- O ~ CON- ,/ O ' "~ CON- Gro~d Water ~om ~e 1 0 :SoH S~ple (feet) - Frac~es M subs~ace None U~o~ Pr~ent (aPpH~ to foothill~ or mount~n ~e=) 1 0 Average ~u~ < 10 10-~ 2640kZ Pradpitation (Mches) 10 M~-made condui~ which None U~o~ Present inge=e vertic~ ~afon of leachate 10 :UMque site features: None At le~t More soil, ae~by we~s, etc. COL~ TOT~ 50 +- 0 + = 50 ~GE TOT~ ~S. 49 p~. or more 41 - 48 pm. '40 pm or less B~ .~~ (PPM) ~H ~~ (PPM) \1 \z If depth is greater than 5 ft. and less than 25 ft., score '0 points. If depth is 5 ft. or less, this table should not be used. If precipitation is over 40 inches, score 0 points. Levels for BTX&E are not applicable at a TPI-I concentration of 100 pprm iq_ APPENDIX A BORING LOGS UINFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS LTR DESCRIPTION GRAVEL GW WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES. AND POORLEY~RADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURF~. GP LI3-rLE OR NO FINES ..... GRAVELEY 'COARSE: ,. GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL SAND CLAY MIXTURES CLAY GRAVELs, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MI .XTuRES "" GC CLAYEY SOILS AND POORLEY~3RADED SANDS OR GRAVELY SANDS, S P UTTLE OR NO FINES SANDY ' SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES SOILS SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND- CLAY M~XTURES ,! SILTS INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, RCCK FLOUR, ML SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS, OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY AND CLAYS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS FINE LL<50 D L ORGANIC SILTS, AND ORGANIC SILT-CLAYS, OF LOW PLASTICITY SI ETS I INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS RNE. GRAINED MH SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTY AND CH INORGANIC CLAYS, OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS SANDS CLAYS LL>50 D H ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH' PLASTICITY HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS P L PEATAND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS WELL "Tl'll(ppm) PID ~ m i,z m ]~ SOILD~CRI~ION o~ Surfac~gmss 0 .~ ' SC ~ 0 11 - 5 .. SM SAND, Claycy~ bro~, loose, moist ~ ~ 0 10 - lo SC SAND, Silty, very fine grained, .. ~ brom, medium dense, & d~, no odor .& '? ~ - 968 53 ~ ~ S~D, Clayey, brom, ve~ stiff, ~~ ~ d~, slight gasoline odor --Cement 767+ 13 ~0- 02133 ~~ grout SAND, Clayey, brown, stiff, ve~ d~, gas odor Lo.ed By: Surhce Elevation: feet Supcmised By: MINE~ TotalDepth: 96.5 feet Diameter o[Boring: 10' inches Date Drilled: October 26, 1989 Water Encountered at: feet ~-1 Page lof Project Number 3E-1032 November 1989 / -Laboraton, Ficld I- IZ~ Ii CON WELL " m~} PlD ~ Z i1. a la · · TI'iI(pp ) ~ m ! ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION STRUCTION . da 8 z: · ~ ~u · f:. , 2(X)0 4 10 SM SAND, Silty, very fine grained, i' 'I brown, loose, very dry, .slight hydrocarbon odor i - ! ~ . _1 830 2000~ 20 ~30- "' " SAND, Medium dense, . .: .,, . ', _ SAND, same as a~vo ' Ben 'n~te ' ~ ' ~ SW SAND, Very fine to coarse grained, brom, black, white and pink, graines, medium dense, slightly moist, no odor ~ ' 02138 SAND, Slight odor Blank casing ~ 12~ 5~ '33 02139 SAND, Dense , THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc. "T~TMENTBYDESIGN" LOGof BORING ~-I Page 2oB 4 Project Number 3E-I032 November 1989 CI IEMICAL ANALYSI~ WELL 6N 'II'tl(ppm) PID o~ o. ~: CONSTRUCTI 8 g ' ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION ?"= ':" 4000: 42 - 55 SAND, Very fine to coarse grained, ii.:I = :.. light and dark graines, dense, · slqghtly moist, slight odor .'.' . '. '~ , ~. -".'."~.,?]. ['"" = ':" ;000-~32 6d SAND,'Silty, very fine grained, . :7 ~-:~)q/~¢ii:i~::~ :'""' -=':" brown, dense, slightly moist, odor 7._=- .:'. :'-': = ';" ' ' · 'z .' - ," .,-::'-. ,' '.; ~,~i~:,- :...: = .:'. :":'= ':'[' 65 ?.= ::.~. 0.~ Sloltcd ~ . 5~ ~]:']]:] =:'" 4" PVC ~ :'.: casing ML , ~ .' SILT, Sandy clayey, bro~, ha~d, · :.~= .:':. - 1.2 ~ 70 SILT, Clayey, bro~, ve~ still -., ~ :.. . slightly moist, no odor ?.= :.' ?.= :.' :': =' 11 ~ q 22 75 SILT, Clayey, bro~, ve~ stiff, :.:.= ' slightly moist, slight odor ]..:. = 405 20 ao SILT ...... Endcap ~J "TR~.IENTBYDESIGN" L 0 Go / ~ 0 al N G ~-1 Projccl Numbcr 3E-103Z November 1989 Page 't - CHEMiCAL~'fi[NALYSES SAMPLE > ..... Laboratol~r [ Field -. I- 'r' ~ ~ Ig I~ ~. ;.' WELL -TPH(ppm) [ PID ~ ~ n~ II ~ g]~ O CONSTRUCTION fa. _ ~. m z I. ~ ... ' -J o tu" a · ~n SOIL DESCRIPTION I------- . - .i' ~ - 425 37 . lis 02146H SM SAND, Silty clayey, t'me to coarse ~ ' "-'¥: I1 grained, vail-colored grains, dense, . · )~:~,i ~!~ .. ' -. . · · % ~:.~:~:~-:.~'~ · 1:.;':.5')1 i ' '. ,' . 'i.. ' '~ ' I~,~ THORNE_ ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc. UNION CEMETARY PLA [~f..¢);~ , ByDEsiGN,, LOG of BORING I -- VE-1 Page 4of 4 ] Project NUmber 3E-1032 December 1989 . WELL CONSTRUC~FION Cement backfill Bentonote Blank casing · "i~pi I(ppm) 280 qALYSI?.S soIL DESCRIPTION Surface-~rass SAND, Clayey, Brown, medium dense, moist, no odor ..... SILT, Sandy, Yme-~mned, medium dense, moist, no ~or CLAY, Sandy silt, brown, hard, slightly moist SAND, Silty, fine-grained, brown, medium dense, slightly moist, odor Surface Elevation: feet Total Depth: 53.0 feet · Date Drilled: October 27, 1989 i . ?THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc. Project Numbcr 3E-1032 Novemher 1989 Logged By: Supervised By: Diameter of Boring: Water Encountered at: MINETrE inches feet UNION CEMETERY LOG of BORING VE-2 IPLATE Page lof I' CI IEMICAL--~NALYSES SAMI'LE >-- o WELL "IT'll(ppm) PID o ~ ,, Ii m ~ tn O ~ .a ,~ ~ · tn ~ r . SOIL DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION m ~ ~ ~ = ~ >- ~n ~ 1323 23 {)2153 5-"- SAND, Very fine to medium grained, tan, medium dense ~ slightly moist, odor Black and white grains also :.....: ~ 355 36 :~0 02154 ~.~'~ SAND, Same as above except dense' ' 1~.?~::-~.14. ~vCr~ SAND, Same as above casing 198 24 - ~o 02156 ~.2}~' SAND, Same as above except medium ~... ~. dense 201 26'4s 02157'~'¢~ SAND, Same as above ~ 577 50 '50 i 2158~~~~ SAND, Silty, fine grained dark brown, dense, sightly moist, Endcap no odor Bentonlte [~,slHORNE ENVI~ONMENIAL, Inc. UNION CEMETERY ~TE Page 2or 2 ~ Project Number 3E-1032 November 1989 {7' WELL CONSTRUCTION Ccmcnt backfill CI1EMICAL ANALYSF~S Laborator ' ;l'PlI(ppm) SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface-grass SAND, Silty, very fine to fine grained, brown,soft moist, no odor SAND, Slightly moist SAND, Silty, fine to medium grained, dark brown, medium dense, slightly moist, no odor SAND, same as above Surface Elevation: feet Total Depth: 51.5 feet Date Drilled: October 27, 1989 I /,THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc. [#~ "TREMTMENT BY DESIGN" Project Number 3E-I032 Novc~nbcr 1989 Loggcd By: Supervised By: Diameter of Boring: Water Encountered at: MINETrE 8" inches feet IUNI()N CEMETERY LOG of BORING T-I PLATE Page lof 2 ------'-- ~ CIIEMICAL ANAI.YSES,, SAMPLE WELL "TPll(ppm) ' PID ~O o ~ ~ ~. ~- 0; g SOIL DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTIQN m o o ~ ,-~ ~z ~r Sola .. ;! i!i~i 140 1821 18 02163 ~.!~c..~SW SAND, Very fine to medium grained,tanmediumWith lightdense,andslightlydark grainS,moist, strong ,:. '.~,.' · 3 fl ' '''~ - ' ~.¢. 1122 33 02164 '; - SAND, very fine to coarse grained, ~'.'.--" ~ '-"-';: tan, medium dense, :~..~'c'"'":~':':' ~ · / -".'-, slightly mOist, strong odor ,'-~ .= ~?~...,.~ ~ .,, . -. -, medium ~ainod, . ... .... ~ SAND, very fine to ~.'.~ .brom, ve~ dense, slightly moist, [~ ~ strong odor '' ....:' 2' ?. ~. {'.~ ~ ~ 420 ~ - ~0 -. 021~ ~¢.~ SAND, samo as abovo ~, ~ 02167 .'~ SAND, same as . ~.'.~ '¢...'~'_. - ~0 54 - 50 021~ ?~ SAND, very fine to coarse grained, · .'~. brown, very dense, ~.. '.~' . r~ ,I ~' ' slightly moist, strong odor -'..:' ;'. -. ~THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc: UmO~CEMETERY P~TE T-1 Page Projcct Numbcr 3E-103Z November 1989 . APPENDIX B ANALYTICAL RESULTS ANALYTICAL RESULTS Sample #/ Boring/ Depth 02135 VE-1, 30' 02139 VE-1, 50' VE-1, 75~ 02148 VE-1, 95' 02152 VE-2, 20' 02155 VE-2, 35' 02158 VE-2, 50' 02163 T-I, 25' 02166 T-i, 40' 02168 T-i, 50' TPH as gasoline Benzene Toluene Xylene (ppm). (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 830 1,200 4 280 46 140 420 230 1'4 89 1.3 ND 0.320 ND ND 0.031 ND 0.81 120 0.0024 11 0.003 0.056 3 29 51 290 0,012 0.0026 52 0.0027 0.093 90 74 68 Ethylbenzene. Lead (ppm) - (ppm) ND 8.6 ~ ND 0.027 9.3 27 46 6.8 6.9 ' 6.8 ENVIRONMENTAL_ I UNION CEMETERY PROJECT NO, I BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA . ANALYTICAL RESULTS 3E-1032 I ;:,Nat. ional -loxlcolog r ..- · .Laboratories Il-' 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sheath, B.S. Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D. 805/322-4250 SAMPLE ID: Thorne Environ. Samples (see below, NTL LA8 ~: 91030C OATE SAMPLE RECEIVEO: METHO0:' California OOHS LUFT Manual SAMPLE TYPE: TEST: Total volatile i0/£7/89 OATE 'ANALYZED: il!°i/sg..,..::.<";i..?,i-.,:'!::..'i~ .-" "'e*.:-o" Bum -}" ":' '" :'-' ;-: ::';:':"""-':'¥':':' · · ' -,- ." -'~.. ' ' :-%' ' .::::::..'*.% <",,'.';~4774i?. 1 . SOilS RESULTS: LA8 ~ Minim. um'Re¢orcing Level =' 5 ug/'gm SA~4, P L E ID RESULTS ~ LO,iOC-~ 2.i--'.5 ,'~,50 ug/,~r.~ ' -~'-= Gaz. o Line 91030C-10 2!~ 1200 u9/?:~ as Gasoline 9I,}~OC'-L~ 2!44 Ll ug/'gm as Gasoline o!050C-!9 21=8 a.O ug/gm as Gasoline .~=~ '~=0 ug/'gm as Gasoline '?l,DSC'C-'29 212. B 46 ug/'9,'n as Gasoline ~ ~ i40 ug/'c~n am Gasoline 9!030C-34 =_~o - 9!0~0C-57 2!66 ' 420 u9/'~],% as Gasoline 91050C-S9 2!68 ~,0 ug//~m as Gasoline DATE REPn~TErJ.':-,.. I!/C'8/='~. Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.O., Di rector Environmental Analysis onal ll'oXlcology.'' Laboratories 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATEO WiTH ZALCO LARORA~'ORIE$, INC. Bakersfield, California 93301 T~om&8 C. Sheath, B.S. Nare~h C. Jain, Ph.D. Labofatoe/Db~tot 805/322-4250 ;-"¢ LABORATORY ID: 91050C-6 - . REPORT · = , 0,ate Test' Requested :: ":: ' ~:-"8020 ,- · - ':" :. ' Test Method:' .':EP~ Method .8020 r;' oa~e":~'~;iYz~:''.-,:: 0i2~0V_.89 .::':'~'-'~:':.'"::? ':"~ :'"' '' . ....,...:.._ ........ Samg~e: ,._Oa~e Re~or~ed 08-Nov-89 Type o¢' So~ i .Oate Collected: 25-0ct-89 Basis: .As Received Sample Descrip: 2135 'Surrogate: D8 Toluene Oiiution Fac=or: Ku rt R. Neisess, Ph. D. Oirector Environmental ~nalysis ReDorting ~na!'Msis Constituent Units Re'su,_~ ts LO00 Minimum Repor%ing Level Benzene: ug/Kg ~400.0 % Toluene' , ug/Kg S9000.0 Ethylbenzene' ug/Kg 36000.0 Total Xylenes' ug/Kg 290000.0 Surrogate Recovery: ~ 90.0 1000.00 i000.00 1000.00 1000,00 Commen Cs: California O.O.H.S. Cert. ~225 , ~Nat.~onal ~ loxlcolog'y * *' . Laboratories ,~.' 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES. INC. Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomas C. Sheath, B.S. Chief Toxicolog~ Nareoh C. Jain. Ph.D. 805/322-4250 LABORATORY REPORT Sampie 'ID: 91030C-1© Oate Extracted: Date 27-0ct-8~ Test Requested: ' .:'+?; ..... :"8020 Received: Date Reported OS-Nov-S9 TyDe of Sample: Soil Oa. te Collected: 25-0ct-89 Basis- As Received -'Sample Oescrip: 2139 Surrogate: D8 Toluene Oi'lution F,actor: 1000 Kurt R. Neisess,' Ph.D. ~/ Oirector Environ,'nenc~! ~n~iy~i's ~ Minimum Reporting An~!ysis Reporting Constituent Units Resu!t~ Level Benzene: ug/Kg i300.0 1000.00 Toluene: ug/Kg 120000.0 1000.00 Ethy!benzene: ug/Kg 24000.0 1000.00 To~al Xylenes: ug/Kg ~30000.0 ~000.00 Surrogate Recovery: % lO0.O Comments: California D.O.H.S. Cert. '~225 .:,~at. ional · lox: col " L,ogy' aborat Dries ~¢. '3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC, Bakersfield, California 93301 Thomal C. Sheath, Naresh C. Jain. Ph.D. 805/322-4250 LABORATORY 91050C-15 [.':Date 'Received: 27-Oct~s9 oats Analyzed: :, O!-Nov-89 Date Reported 08-Nov-89 Oa'te Col !ecte,,~: 25-0ct-89 REPORT ..... , : .... ' ' ' ~"' ",'"JC .... . ":: ". :',/:-~-'. ,~ ~fe's tMe' t"nod": ~'"-'.EPA ..... '"'Me ............ thud ¥8020' "": ~ !,~7%:.?¥c¢7;,";~z;~'~ Type o¢ Sample: .... Suez Basis: A.s Received Sample De~crip: 2144 Surrogate: 08 Toluene Oiiucion ;actor: Kur% R. Neisess, Ph.D. Oirector Environmental Constituent Analysis ~/ Reporting Minimum Analysis Reporting Resu i t.s Level Benzene: ug/Kg Toluene: ug/Kg Ethylbenzene: ug/Kg To'cai Xylenes: ug/Kg Surrogate Recovery: ~ None Detected 1.00 None Oetmcced !.00 1.4 1.00 12.0 !.00 116.0 Comments: California O.O.H.S. Cert. ~225 lat. ibnal I'-'loxlcolog r '" Laboratories 3101 - l'6th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. Bakersfield, California 9330]. Thoma. C. Sneath, B.S. (~ief Toxk:o~xJ~t Naresh C. Jain. Ph.D. [.aboratop; Director 805/322-4250 'Ii-Sample I0: Date ~eceived Oate Analyzed Oate Collected: Sample Descrip: LABORATORY REPORT 910~0C-!9 Oate C:'< t fac 5ed: n/'a 27-0ct-89 O1-Nov-89 08-Nov-89 25-0c~-89 2148 Test Requested: 8020 BTX Test M=~thod: EPA Method 8020 :, ~,..,,.':; :- . Type of Sample- :' Soil'-~. i'~i¢::.:~i:~'-~!~?.?:'::).~:,"::'- Surrogate: 08 Toluene .... Oilution Factor: Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D. OirecCor Environmencal Constituent Ana' Reporsing Units Benzene:' ug/Kg ,Jc] / Toluene: =. Kg E tnylDenzene: ug/Kg To~a! Xy!enes: ug/Kg Surrogate Recovery: % Minimum Analysis P. ecorting Re'su ! t~ L=~vel None Detected 1.00 £.4 !.00 None De~eoted 2.6 1 O0 OommenEs: California O..O.H.S. Cert. .,Nat. lonal ~om.. ~. ~_~. ~.~. !'-- loXlcology.-" Nareih C. Jain, Ph.D. Laboratories ~c. ~.,..~,,.~o~o~.o_.,~. 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 Bakersfield, California '93301 805/322-4250 LgBORgTORY' REPORT Sample I0: 91050C-25 Oate Extracte'2: Date Rece, ived: 27-0ct-S9 Test Requested:" 8020 BTX Date Reported 08-Nov-S9 Type Oate Corrected: 21 Surrogate: D8 Toluene Sample Oescrip: 52 Dilution Factor: 200 ~urt R. Neisess, Ph.O. Oirec~or 6nvironmenca! ~naly'zis minimum Re2ortin9 ~naiysi3 Re~orting Consti tuent ,.Jnits Resul Benzene: ug/Kg 320.0 200. O0 Toluene: ug/K9 L L,'200. EChylbenzene: ug/Kg 8eO0.O · 200. Total ;:(ylanas: ug/K~ 52000.0 200.00 Surrogate Recovery: ~ 92.0 Comments: California n.O H S ,Cent I ional [lOxlcolog r .... Laboratories 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. Bakersfield, California LABORATORY REPORT 93301 Thom-.. c. Snum. s.S. Naresh C. Jain, Ph.D. 805/322-4250 li'-iSamDle 'ID: 91030C-26 Date Received: 27-00t-89 Date Analyzed: O1-Nov-89 -.,Date Reported OB-Nov-89 IS-Date Collected: 25-0ct-89 l'iSample Descrip: 21~5 Date Extrac ~d. n./a Test Requested: 8020 BTX Test Method:' EP;~ Method 80. Type of Sample: .... ',', ~., Soil. Dilution Factor: 1 Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D. Oirector Environmental Consul cuenC Analysis~ Reporting tJni ts Minimum Analy~i~ Reporting Resu!t~ Level Benzene: ug/Kg None Detected !.00 Toluene: ug/Kg I.O 1.00 Ethylbenzene:~ ug/Kg None Detec5ed 1.00 Total Xytenes: ug/Kg 2.7 1.00 Surrogate Recovery: % Coh~ment5: California D O.H S Cert ~= AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES. INC. Baker.sfielcl, Californi~ 93301. Thomae C. Sheath, B.S. Chief To~lcolo~st Nareoh C. Jain. Ph.D. 805/322-4250 I~'~ample ID: Date Received: te Analyzed: '*Date Reported ..*Date Collected: ['Sample Descrip: LABORATORY 91030C-29 REPORT Date Extracted: n/a 27-0ct-89, Test Requested: .8020 BTX i._Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D Oirector Environmental Analysis ~ Con'st i tuent Dilution Factor: Reporting Analysis Units Res,J1 ts Minimum Reporting t_~ve! Benzene: ug/Kg. None Detected 1.00' Toluene: ug/Kg ~.6.0 i.00 Ethylbenzene: ug/Kg 27.0 ~.00 Total Xylenes: ug/Kg 9~.0 ~.00 Surrogate Recovery: % Comments: California O.O.H.S. Cert. F.,Nat. iona 1 i--ioxlcology..- Laboratories 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. Bakersfield, California' 93301 Thomal C. Sheath, B.S. c~et To~ Naruh C. Jal~, Ph.D. 805/322-4250 LABORATORY REPORT ,i~ample ID: 91050C-34 "Date Received: 27-0ct-89 { -:Date Ana!~zed: 01-Nov-89 .Date Reported 08-Nov~89 Co!!ected:...25-0ct-89 --Sample Descrip: 2163 Oate Extracted: n/a ' Test ReqUested: 8020 BiX .... ' : '. . . ': ... 12 :,'%-: .~',,,' eX.':?: ,'%~A,:%;:i.f¢:.k'.'~2.,:.~*~::"- -' Type of Sample. .-. ..... So~l :,-;,,-:.j .... .~:tl .... .. 8asis' ~s .... Received :;,.,~ :~:,?'. 'Surrogate: DS Tozuen ..-'.-.."..::.c. .... O~u:ion Fac:or: 25 [Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D. _.Director Environmental Cons ti tuent Benzene: Toluene: E~hylbenzene: Total. Xylenes: Surrogate Recovery: Analysis Reporting Uni ts ut/Kg ut/Kg ut/Kg us/Kg AnaiYsis Resu I ts 31.0 3000.0 9300.0 90000.0 9i.0 Minimum Reoorting Level 25.00 25.00 25. O0 2-5.00 Commerlts: California O.O.H.S. C'er t. 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATED WITH ZALCO LABORATORIES, INC. Bakersfield, California 93301 Thorne, C. Sheath, B.$. ch~ To,,~xmx3~ . Na~esh C. Jain, Ph.D. 805/322-4250 LABORATORY REPORT )ate DaTe $i,-'ple IO: 91030C-37 Received: £7-0ct-89 Analyzed: O1-Nov-89 Reported OS-Nov-89 collected: :. 25-0ct-89 Oescrip: ~166 ~ n/a 3..%te ExtracteO: Test Reouested: 8020 BTX Oi!u~ion Fac[or: 200 ...... '.:"" ~ij~' ~ R. Neisess, PM.D. ,- ector Cnvi to,amen ia! Benzene: Toluene: .=_ tmy!Denzene: To,al Xylenes: Ed rogate Recovery: .Reoorting tJni t~ ug/Xg ug/Kg Analysis Re,3Lt ;_ None Detected 29000 .O 27000.0 7-~000. ;) 99.0 minimum Reporsing L:n~ve i 200.00 £00. O0 £00. O0 200. O0 Commencs:, ,"}iifor'nia.~. 0.0 .H .S. Cert. ~225 aona ~ loXlc I " o o. gy Laboratories ~c.....,.~.ow..~.=...o~.~o~,....~.. 3101 - 16th Str~t, Sult~ 107 B~k~r~fl~ld, C~llfornl~ 93301 LABORATORY REPORT ~ Sample ZO: Date Rec~&ved: 27-0ct-89 ' - Date Analyzed: 01-Nov-89 Oate Collected :25-0c~-89 ,._ Sample Descrip: 2168 Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D. O~.rector 6nv~_i*onmenta! ~nalysis Consti r. uent Thomas C. Sheath, B.$. Ch~i N&rIsh C. Jain. Ph.D. Lab~ Dl~r 805/322-4250 Suffocate: D8 Toluene Oi!ution Factor: 2O0 minimum Reporting Apa!ysis Reporting Uni h.~ Res,J ! t~ Level 200.00 £00. ,:'.0 200. O0 · _00. O0 Commen cs: California O.O.H.S. Cer't. :~£25 loxtcologT" Labotato.ries 3101 - 16th Street, Suite 107 AFFILIATEDWITH~LCO~BORAmRIES. INC. Bakersfield, California 93301 LABORATORY REPORT SAMPLE ID: Thorne Environ. Samples (see below) NTL LAB fi: 91050C .-' Naresh C. Jain. Ph.D. Laborato~7 Director Thomas C. Sneath, B.$. · Chief Toxicologist 805 / 322-4250 800 / 350-3515 DATE:'SAMPLE RECEIVED: i0/27/89 -.' ..~-:. ::i .... ~ '::~' :' -" ..: TEST REQUESTED: Total Lead .. ,. · · ' ';.~..'"::::'.RESULTS: Minimum Re'por:ing Level .= 2.5 mg/Kg RESULTS 1 L~B ~ · SAMPLE [D ' ' ' " rog/kg ~-" 9[0~0C-57 2[66 6.9 mg/kg 9Z050C-39 2[68 6.8 mg/kg REMARKS: Test performed at Zalco Laboratories, Inc. DATE REPORTED: 11/15/89 Kurt R. Neisess, Ph.D., ,~F~ Director Environmental Analysis 'l ENVIRONMENTAL PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME , L.P. NO. ' SAMPLERS: (Signature/Number) DAT~ ~A~PLE I.D. - SAMPLE I.D. TAINEHS HE~AHK~ TI~E .~..'_,- /,. ~ ,~ ~ .. .. . ~ ~ ~, ,., ,~ ; .~ , ,~ ~' ~ '. . ,., . -7 .~ ,/, ,.~ ~ ... ~ . ~: .,. I ~ ~ ¢.,,,¢ ...... ,, I ,' .~ ~ : .'..' . c. ,,..... ~ .D , ~'~ ~ ,.-:...._,.~ .,,. .,, _ ..... ' ,': .-:" .. J ""' ~/ , '.'";:(:~'.~, ..:~.. ,~.5~, Attention of ~.~, '-., .... ~.,, ~ ~., . · : ": "' ........... ~/ ~' ~ "~ '. /~.:~ ," ~ .... I ~ ...... ~.. ,. c.G'j~,~ ' '; '''~ ;" ~-~ 'THORN~"ENglRONMENTAL INC. Reli~quished b~ {Signllurl} .... Relinquished b~ ISignJturel Dare.line Received lot Labornlo~ by: ' While · Sampler Canary - flelurn Copy To Stopper Pink · Lab Copy jr~_? NVIRONMEN , , L.P. NO.' SAMPLERS: (Signature/Number) DATE SAMPL£ I.D. 8AMPLE I.D. TAIHERS MM/DD/YY HH:MM:$$ ..... Relinquished by:. ISigneture) " Date(Time ' Received by: (Stgltelure) While * Sampler Canary · Relum Copy TO Shipper Pink * Lab Copy PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME .~-/o_~.x No. L.P, NO. SAMPLERS: (Signature/Number) 'J OF · C°N. REMARKS DATE SAMPLE I.D. SAM P~Z]~ I.D. TAINERS TIME MM/DD/YY HH:MM:SS ---- ~~ ~ -r-t ~ ~s' JL___/__-----~/ ---- ~~-~ ~~------7---- ~'~ ~ ~o"~~ ~_____ Received by: ($1gnalu*e) Remark~ , :<- ~ .... :./; .';;~, I Send Results To Dale~ime by: (Signlturl) ', . ~'.~, ~ ~'-- ..,;., Attention of R~linquished by: (Signaluri) ,~;.?O.~~' ~:.?~. ~,~? 'WORK PLAN FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND VAPOR EXTRACTION OF GASOLINE IMPACTED SOIL AT THE LrNION CEMETERY BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · PRESENTED TO: UNION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION PRESENTED BY: THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MARCH, 1589 1.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS In~oducfion 1.1 Purpose 1.29 Scope of Work 1.3 Schedule . Background ' Work Plan 3.1 Soil Boring Depth~ and LOcatiOns .Methods 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Boring Methods Soil Sampling Installation of Vapor Extraction Wells Field Screening of Soil Sample,:s Soft Analyses Quality Assurance Plan 5.1 Sample Collection and Handling Protocol 5.2 Sample Identification and Chain of Custody Protocol 5.3 Analytical Quality Assurance Site Safety Plan Remarks and Signatures Appendices: A B C Vapor Extraction System Site Safety Plan Material Safety Data Sheet 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 1.0 INTRODUCTIO~ The following workplan will describe the procedures necessary to assess and remediate the soil impaction in the vicinity of a previously removed underground storage tank operated by the Union Cemetery Association. ;the Union Cemetery Association has authorized Thorne Environmental to prepare a work plan for soil assessment at the Union Cemetery located at 700 Potomac Avenue, Bakersfield, California. A site location map is included as Figure 1. The lead agency for this project is the Kern County. Division of Environmental Health. 1.1 PURPOSE . The s°il assessment/remediation described in this work plan has the following objective:' o Assess the lateral and vertical extent of the 'contamination pb~me in.the vicinity of the previously removed underground leaded(?) storage 't_anlC. o Install soil vapor extraction system as required in order to remediate'the impacted soil in a timely fashion. . SCOPE OF WORK -. The scope of services described in this Wor,k. Plan include: A. Locating underground utilities utilizing Union Cemeterfs information as well as the Underground Service Alert(USA). .5. Advancing of up to 4 soil borings in the vicinity of the underground storage tank as shown on Figure 2. The borings will be advanced to approximately 50 feet or 5 feet of unimpacted soil. The augers will be steam cleaned prior to and between each boring to avoid cross-contamination. Collection of soil samples at depths to be evaluated in the field. Initially,- samples will be collected at approximately 5 foot intervals to total depth. The samples will be collected using a standard California Split-Spoon Sampler with brass tubes steam cleaned prior to use. These samples will be field screened and selected samples will be chosen for chemical analysis. Field screening will be accomplished using a photoionizing detector with a 10.0 eV lamp. Soil samples will be placed in mason jars to appro.,dmately 50,°,o capacity, shaken, and let stand for 15 minutes. A standard head-space reading will be collected at this th-ne. 58 UNION CEMETERY 'HORNE ENVIRONMENTAL LOCATION MAP UNION CEMETERY FIGURE 1 POTOMAC FENCE AVE. THORNE · 3RD HOLE. 1 ST HOLE · 2ND HOLE ROAD LEGEND O B k._I/~.APPROXIMATE 1 F FORMER TANK ~ T 3 VE 1 LOCATION · ! I ! ~/ k__: / 0 5 FT I APPROX. SCALE BuiLDING O SOIL BORING .PROPOSED BORING ENVIRONMENTAL SITE LOCATION MAP UNION CEMETARY SHOWING PRESENT.& PROPOSED SOIL BORING' LOCATIONS LF 1 LOCATION LOCATION FIGURE 2 'Soil samples for chemical analyses will be collected in brass tubes and sealed with end caps and duct tape. The sealed tubes 'will be immediately 'placed in a cooler with blue ice and transported to Med-Tox Associates Laboratory under Chain-of-Custody protocol...- Soil samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organics and total lead, using EPA methods 8015 moalt~ed, 8020 and 7420 respectively. .. Install vapor extraction well in the selected soil boring according to the design shown in Figure 3/ .. .'~ Preparation of field' boring l?gs, along with the vapor extraction well construction details. , . : . : - . -. ..... · InStall vapor'extraction system as described in detail in Appendix. A, Prepare a detailed Written report Which describes .the results of the' s0ii investigation and will include drilling methods, sampling methods, chemical analytical results, distribution of leaded(?) gasoline contnminants, recommendations and conclusions, and details of the installation and operation of the vapor recovery system. 10. 1.3 SCHEDI~E · ' weeks upon approval by me county ana aumonzat?n .tu p~u~,.~, ,~, m~'C.emetery Association. All drilling will commence only after appucame county permlu ., have been obtained. - ',,.c,~. The soil borings should be completed within one week of mobilization to the site. - Installation of the vapor extraction ~ in the selected soil boring will be complete -- - , . --in 'a royal to construct and operate the V'ES by the Kern County'/, ~'~.-~ k~~ Air Pollution Control D~stnct, Thorne Enwronmental will construct and ms ~-~ ] concurrently_ Pend g :pp. · ' ' tall the VIES v ~'.\ including associated' piping, instrumentation, and electrical connections within two weeks" ' fi:om the completion of drilling operations. (~ A factual report of findings described in Item 11 of Section 1.2 above will be submitted within the first month of VES operation. This initial report will detail drilling operations, installation of the V'ES, and will include results of the additional soil investigation with recommendations and conclusions. Letter status reports will be issued monthly thereafter detailing the V'ES performance. Upon completion of the remediation, Thorne Environmental will issue a Final RePort of Findings. GROUND SURFACE 3 FEET~ 3 9 FEET CAP CEMENT gROUT SE~TO~TE SEx~ 35 4 - INCH DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC SCREEN PERFORATION SLOT SIZE:0.020" $3 MONTEREY SAND OR EQUIVALENT ... NOTES: PIPE CONNECTORS SHOULD HAVE GASKETS OR TEFLON TAPE. SLIP CAP HORNE ENVIRONMENTAL I !OJECT NO- 3E-1032 IEXTRACTION WELL' DETAIL UNION CEMETERY · NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 3 2.o BACKC RO V The Union' Cemetery is located at ?00 Potomac Avenue in th~ ci~ ot Bak~rsfi=ld, Count, C~ifo~a. ~ underground storage ta~ in question was located south o~ Potomac Avenu~ and 100 t~t w~st ot ~ng Street. Wegener Const~ction removed the und~r~ound l~ad~d(?) g~olin~ storag~ m~ a~ th~ U~on C~m~te~.' Two soil samples w~r~ co~ct~d b~n~a~h th~ c~nt~r ot th~ 500 gallon ta~. ~es~ samples wer~ analyzed for tot~ p~trol~um hydroc~bom (~H) ~d volatfi~ '~omatics (B~ ~ E). , s~pl~s had r~po~d values ~at indicated soft ~pa~on oc~d and that a site ~s~ssm~m wo~d b~ r~q~r~d. Subsequen~y, 10 bongs wer~ conducted (s~e Fi~r~ 2). How~r, ~y f~d ~o d~n~at~ ~ lat~r~ and ve~ic~ ~xt~m ot th~ ~pact~d soil. ~om~ En~onment~ proposes m'~sess ~d ~v~uat~ th~ lateral ~d v~C~ extent ~ cont~~ ~ ~ so~ at ~ fa~. AddiSon.y, w~ propos~ to ~t~ a ~S to ~act ~ vapo~ contend ~ ~ soil. W~ propos~ to adv~c~ up to fo~ (4) soil borings to d~p~s to be dete~ed ~ ~e field-~th subsequent ~t~afion of ~the selected vapor ex.action well and ~al co~ection to the ~S. 3.1 SOIL BO~NGS DE~ ~ LOtiONS ~o'me En~romental proposes to ~sess and ev~uate the ~11 later~ ~d venic~ extent of the containers in the soil. ~ome proposes to advance four (4) soil bodngs to depths to be dete~ined ~ the field. It is ~tially pla~ed to advice ~e borings to 50 feet or 5 feet of u~mpacted soil Mth staples co~ecred at 5 foot ~te~als. ~e dete~nation that 5 feet of u~mpacted soil has been encountered ~11 be b~ed upon the follo~ng: Visual Inspection Headspace analysis using a 10.0 eV photoionizing detector. Any detected organic vapors in excess of 5 ppm above ambient, will be used as the basis for our decision to terminate or continue the boring. These locations have been chosen based upon the geologic setting, orientation of the previously removed tank and careful mapping of the previously required two soil borings (see Figure 4, 5, and 6). A soil boring will be advanced under previous tank location. This boring is intended to evaluate the vertical extent o1~ the contamination and then be converted into a vapor extraction well. Thorne also proposes to advance the additional three soil borings around the previous sampling locations. Relative distances from the previous sampling locations were chosen to assess the potential fringe of the impacted soil. Additional soil borings at greater distances from the ori~nal sampling location will be advanced if field screening using the photoionizing detector indicates ionizable organic concentrations in excess of 5 ppm above ambient in the currently proposed locations. P( OMAC FENCE AVE. ./ 1: APPROXIMATE TANK LOCATION ,L 13RD HOL~ BUILDING LF I~ ROAD 0 5 FT APPROX. SCALE '-HORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RO,TECT ~]'O 3E-!032 LEGEND SOIL BORING LOCATION PROPOSED BORING LOCATION ICONTOUR MAP ~f TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBON in PPM ' UNION CEMETERY FIGURE 4 1st. D EI~'I"II i Ell T-3 G lO TVII- ND 1'VII'ND I PL-I' TVII J]-IZ 10 30- TD 30' 40- 60- 7O TI-IORNE I I I I I ~-7.2. 'f'71~ X-5~ TVH-Z CONCENTRATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL A VE-I' OISd Sd X-~O , X- B00 'TVH -6,1 B-"tl T-311 oES-I ~5' --"-- TVt!- Il dCL ,SiSd SiSd , TI) 45 ' TD 41 ' of TOTAL VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS in PPM Sd VERTICAL SCALE 1" -' ' 10' tlORIZONTAL SCALE 1" '= 2 1/2' 1:4 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION ' E SiSd -ND CISdS: .~ -ND Sd -ND SdS ClS: SiSd . rfD_7() , FIGURE 5 S B-2 DEi')Ti[ ( tq,: ~'r ) PROPOSED B T- I Sd I I SdCI ,lSd S I ! I d TD41' A 000 X-~o ]'vtt- PROPOSED VE-1 B-3 2nd 'PROPOSED N T-1 3rd J 'O i CISd 6,000 B'q7 ~-~,, I Sd J'B- 1~8 ._._.._~5,000 SiSd ~-~ ~Sd "' X-220 .., 'I'D4 5 ' T-7~ '?D 4 1" ND q'D20' 60-- CONTINUATION of 70..- TI I(3RHF ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL VOLATILE,HYDROCARBONS in PPM IlORIZON"I'AL VERTICAL 1" 4:] 1" = 2 1/2' = lO" IIORIZONTAL EXAGGERA'i'ION FIGURE 6, i 4.0 METI-IODS The methods employed implementing the above scope of work are described in this' section. 4.1 BORING METHODS The borings will be advanced using a Mobile Drill B-53 fig, or equivalent, with a 4-inch or larger hollow stem continuous flight auger in accordance with ASTM Method'D 1452- 80 for soil investigations and sampling by auger borings. At no time shall any water or ' ~-. other :liquid be added to the boring. The augers will be steam cleaned prior to drilling each :boring. The lithology and other pertinent data will be recorded on a field boring .log in accordance with ASTM Method D 2488-84 fo~ visual descri'ption and identification Cuttings and other SPoil from the borings will placed in aPpropriate 55 gallon cont_a~ners ' or on sheets of Plastic and Covered until verified, with analytical results, Whether or not the soil is contaminated. If the material is contaminated, a written plan will be. submitted by the facility operator to the County for their approval before treatment and/or disposal occurs. Disposal will be the responsibility of the Facility operator and ~ occur within 90 days of completion of drilling. The 'soil borings will be abandoned by backfilling as follows: ' -: o Borings which do not encounter any contamination will be backfilled with native soil and sealed with a five foot plug of cement grout../ o Borings which encounter contamination will be backfilled with either neat cement gout or sand-cement gout by pouring through a funnel placed near /. the bottom of the boring. The bentonite content will not exceed 5% of the -_ mixture. 4.2 SOIL SAMPLING Soil samples will be collected through the auger in 2-inch brass sleeves driven in a split· spoon sampler by a 140 pound hammer with a 30-inch drop in accordance with ASTM Methods D 1586-84 for split-barrel sampling of soil and D 1587-83 for thin-walled tube sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler will be steam cleaned prior to each use. Soil samples will be driven at depths of 5, 10, 15, 20,' 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 feet in each boring depending on total depth.· The total depth of the borings will extend to 5 feet below the last detected indication of contamination. 'The blow counts, recovery, and lithology will be recorded on the field logs. Lithology will be described in accordance with ASTM procedure D2488-84 (Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils). One brass sleeve with soil from each interval will be capped, sealed, labeled in 4 accordance with EP3, protocols, recorded on a Chain of Custody Form, placed in a cooler at 4 de~rees centigrade or less, and transported to lVled-Tox Associates Laboratory with the Chain of Custody for the Specified analyses. 4.3 INSTALLATION OF VAPOR E,TrRACTION WELLS The vapor extraction well (VEW) WIll be constructed as shown on Figure 3 and installed 'in the following manner. The 4 inch schedule 40 poly vinyl chloride (PVC) will be flush threaded and steam cleaned prior to installation. Up to 35 feet of 0.020 inch slotted PVC, an end cap, and enough pipe to reach the surface will installed through the 'auger. Number 3 sand will be poured down the auger while removing five feet of auger at a time. The filter pack will be placed 3 feet above the screened interval. -Three feet of bentogite pellets will be poured to form a seal. The well cover boxes and conduit for the probe leads will be set in cement. The probes/detectors, :control boxes' (descn'bed above), conduit and trenches will be set in. accordance with standard .practice. , . 4.4 FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES Soil samples will be collected using three six-inch .brass tubes installed in,de a split-. spoon sampler. The middle sample tube will be immediately capped and stored in an iced cooler upon collection. The bottom tube will be used for lithologic description, and the top tube will be used for field screening. The material from the top tube will be placed in mason jar to approximately 50 percent capacity, shaken, and stored for a period of 15 minutes. A standard headspace reading will be collected at t_his time and noted on the boring log. 4.5 SOIL ANALYSES The soLl samples will be analyzed by MED-TOX Associates Laboratory in accordance with state guidelines and EPA protocols. The samples will be analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons by EPA method 8015 modified, and volatile aromatic organics .by EPA method 8020, and for total lead using EPA method 7420. 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN This section describes field and analytical quality-assurance procedures to be followed during the investigation and remediation. 5.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND HANDLING PROTOCOL Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure quality of data obtained from a sample. Each sample therefore will be collected in a brass tube, preserved correctly for the intended analysis and stored for no longer than permissible holding time prior to analysis. Protocol to be applied in this project is described in section 4. 5.2 SAMPLE iD~NTIFICATION AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROTOCOL Sample identification 'and Chain of Custody procedures are designed to assure sample quality and to document sample possession from the time it is collected to. the time of its ultimate disposal. The container for each sample submitted for .analysis will have a label affixed with the identifying number or the number will be inscribed directly on the container if feasible. The analytical laboratory will assign a separate sample number nnique to that sample for internal sample coordination and identification- A description of the sample including the sample number and other pertinent information regarding · its collection and/or geologic significance will be written in field notes, and/or a geolo~c boring log being prepared by the site geologist. These field doc,,ments will be kept m a permanent project file. All samples Mil be analyzed by Med-Tox Associates Laboratory for the analyses, requested; A properly completed Chain .of Custody Form will be submitted to the analytical laboratory along with sample. The laboratory's assigned n-tuber will be properly entered on the form. A quality control officer at tho'.lab, will verify integrit~ of samples submitted, proper sample volume, correctness of containers used, and properly exeCUted Chain of Custody Form. Pertinent information will be entered into a log book kept'by the laboratory. S3 m'~ALYI~Ca& QUALITY ASSURANCE .. In addition to routine calibration of' analytical instruments with standards and blanks, the analyst is required to run duplicates and spiices on 10 percent of analyses to assure an added measure of reliability and precision. Accuracy is verified through the following: 1. U.S. EPA and State certification of results; e Participation in inter-laboratory round robin program; "Blind" samples are submitted for analysis by the quality control officer on a weekly basis. These are prepared from National Bureau of Standards specifications of EPA reference standards; Verification of results with an alternative method. 6.0 SITE SAFETY PLAN Appendix B contains a Site Safety Plan which complies with Worker Right to Know Regulations and CAC Title 26. 6 7.0 REMARI~/SIGNATURES This work plan represents our professional opinions. These opinions are based on currently available data and were arrived at in accordance with accepted hydrogeologic and engineering practices. This work plan was prepared by: Mark Magargee Project Manager-Hydrogeol0gist Barbara Minette Project Manager-Hydrogeologist Date Date This Work Plan was prepared under the supervision of: 15hilip Goalwin Date Operations Manager/Technical Manager This Work Plan was reviewed by: Maurice Gallarda Principal Engineer Date · APPENDIX A VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM General There are many advantages of utilizing Thorne Environmental's Vapor Extraction System (VES). This system is used for the cleanup of soil that is contaminated with volatile organic chemicals. Each unit is portable and can be applied to a wide range of hydrocarbon chemicals. This technology is an advantageous alternative for treatment in non-accessible areas. The operation of the system is approved by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in California, one of the most rigid in the United States. This process is very cost-effective"when applied in its proper geOphysical environment. In most applications, this process will remove volatiles below further action levels thus not requiring more expensive options such as the pig and haul removal'of contaminated' soils to an off-site disposal site. Figure A illustrates the concept of the vapOr extraction system. Process Descxqption A typical vapor extraction well is illustrated in Figure B.' The vapor extraction system consists of a vacuum pump driven by an internal combustion engine (Figure C). The n.~-~yerage flow rate of the vacuum pump is 40 SCFM. The vacuum pump provides §tifficient kinetic ener_rgy to volatilize the hydrocarbons present in the pore spaces of the soil matrix'. The core of the internal combustion unit consists of a 140 cubic-inch engine powered by gasoline or propane (Figures D and E). Vapor extracted from the contaminated soil provides a useable gasoline source for the engine during much of the vapor extraction process. In the latter stages of remediation, propane serves as fuel for the system. This is the result of declining amounts of gasoline available for extraction from the remediated soil. The combined vapors are fed directly to the intake of the engine and, after combustion in the engine, the exhaust is passed through a catalytic converter to insure complete combu~ E~haust discharge from the engine, even when running on 100%/'gasoline vapors, meets the air quality standards for motor vehicle engines. ~7~ q,0 ~~ c~,,~/v~-~ 4r~q ~ r~c~,.,~ ~,~t'~,~ d~ The hydrocarbon vapor in the inlet air stream to the VES is somewhat ~y the inlet air which acts as a carrier gas for the hydrocarbon vapor. The inlet air and vapor flow rate are modulated via an isolation valve. The vacuum blower compresses the inlet air mixture from 15 in.-Hg to a pressure slightly above 0.5 psig. The outgoing air stream from the blower is routed through a built-in silencer which reduces the noise generated during compression down below 85 db. Specific site requirements may indicate noise level be achieved. 8 {OJEC'FNO.~3E-1032 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM SCHEMATIC APPENDIX A UNION CEMETERY FIGURE A-1 ~OUND SURFACE 3 FEET 9 FEET . 20JECT N0.%3E-1032 BENTONITE SEAL 4 INCH DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC SCREEN PERFORATION SLOT SIZE 0.020" MONTEREY SAND OR EQUIVALENT IOTES: PIPE CONNECTORS SHOULD GASKETS 01{'~ TEFLON TAPE SLIP CAP 8- INCP!ES NOT TO SCALE EXTRACTION WELL DETAIL UNION CEMETERY FIGURE A-2 MUFfl.~R CATAI.Y"TI~ ~ONV~'FIT~PI INTERNA COMBUSTION ENGINE VACUUM WATER pl., ~OJEC'PNO.~3E-1032 REMEDIATION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT DRAWING UNION CEMETERY FIGURE A-3 ':2,3Li re (140 CID)Standard Models ~' TAN t ~' SD DOPTINAR 0 S · '.~ ......... [ 6006.A Complete closed power unit, le~s ~005-A Fan t~roug~ llyw~eel Including elect POWER UNITe ENGINES . housing. · . tics -- le~s fiywhael. [ 6004-C Complete closed power unit Including 6003-C Fan through flywheel Including elect- I clutc~ and clutch housing, rics, clutch and clutc~ housing. I 6002-CF Complete closed power unit Including 6001-CF Fan throug~ flywheel includin~ eiect- ~ clutch, clutch housing and ~-s~eed tics, clutch, clutch housing and center antft trsnsmissiDn. . . speed center shift transmission, I 6006-F Comatose close~'power u~it i~cluding ~005-F Fan through flywheel Including elect- ' SAE ~4 housing. ' . tics and SAE i 6006-G Complete closed power unit including 8O0o-G Fan through flywheel Including elect- SAE ~5 ~ouslng. ' tics and SAE ~5 housing. I 6002-GR Complete closed power unit Including 6001-GR' Fan ~hrough flywheel including elect- ~ SAE ~5 housing and heavy duty over tics, SAE ~5 housing and heavy ~uty [ . . center clutch PTO. ,over center clutc~ PTO, ~:J _ .' 8~eclllcatlona lubla~t to change without notice. some Fe~= Engines ate ~ro=uce~ 1~ Fo~d by olher ' A-4 ~ NO.~3E-]032 INDUSTRIAL ENGINE' ual ............... · · Propane or Gasoline · Intermittent Gross -' Horaepqwer ............. ~ .... 63 @ 2800 rpm 'Intermittent Gross Torque ...................... 119 @ 2800 rpm Engine Type ................ In-Line, 4-Cylinder Bore and Stroke .................. 3.781 x :3.126 Olseratlng'cycle ............................ ;. 4 Oisplacemen! ....... ..... ~ (140 CID) 2.3 Litre Compression Ratio .......................... 9:1 Firing Order ............. ~ .............. 1-3-4-2 Oil Capacity (Including Filter) .......... 4.5 Qts. Net Weight. Dry (With Accessories) ..... 319 lbs. 'Engine shown equipped wiltl offset air cleaner aha mechanical governor. Ill NMENTAL . UNION CE METER Y CYLINDER HEAD -- Cast iron cross flow-type offering excellent 'breathing characteristics, Increased performance and fuel economy. CYLINDER BLOCK -- Cast Iron with full length w~ter, jackets resulting In reduced CAMSHAFT -- Overhead camshaft. CRANKSHAFT -- Extremely rigid nodular CaSt iron. 'Incorporates large crankshaft flange to accommodate extra strong flywl~eel bolls and provide a substantial 8slaty and reliability factor. LUBRICATION -- Pressurize(3 lubrication to all b~,artng~ ,~n43 ~isplseffi, OII ml-~l,, and ~l~L'm tO <~ylrnder' ~valla and platon pins: COOLING SYSTEM -- Pressure type --14-18 PSI. By-pass circulation system. WATER PUMP DELIVERY -- 13.1 gals. per rain pump RPM of 1000. FUEL ~Y~F_M ~ Carburetor downdt~,lt. 1V. I FIGURE A-5 APPENDIX B SITE SAFETY PI_akN IntrodUction: .. - · A Site Safety Plan (SSP) has' been &signed to'addreSs safety proqisions needed during ~the site soil assessment/remediation- Its purpOse is to' provide established procedures to protect all on-site personnel from' direct skin contact, inhalation'~ or-inges~tion- of. potentially hazardous materials that may be encountered'at the site. The. SSP eStablishes personnel responsibilities,' personal .protective' equipment, standards decontamination procedures, and emergency action plans. Thorne Environmental, Inc. seeks to enter property described above for the purpose o£ conducting a site assessment consisting of up to four(4) borings to further evaluate the extent of soil impact. . Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals during exploratory drill~ing using a California. modified split-spoon sampler through a hollow-stem auger. All possible efforts will be made to collect undisturbed samples. Each sample to be chemically analyzed will be collected in a brass sleeve, capped with lined plastic lids, sealed with tape, and placed on ice in a cooler immediately. All Chain of Custody protocol will be followed. Drilling equipment will be brought to the site and operated by a subcontractor: Lloyd Melton Drilling 7101 Downing Avenue Bakersfield, California 93308 Contractor's License: C-57 508270 This SSP describes means for protecting all on-site personnel from deleterious contamination of personal injury while conducting on-site activities. As described below we will strive to meet all requirements promulgated by the California .Department of Health Services. Site BackgroUnd: This property is Union Cemetery Assoc~auon s Union Cemetery located at 700 Potomac Avenue, in Bakersfield, California in Kern County. The site contained a single 500 gallon underground leaded (?) gasoline storage tank with a dispensing unit directly above the center of the tank. Responsibilities of Key Personnel: All personnel on-site will have assigned responsibilities. Mark Magargee, will serve as Project Manager and On-Site Geologist. He will also serve as S~te Safety Officer (SSO). As SSO, Mr. Magargee will assure that on-site personnel have received a copy of SS?. Personnel will be required to document their full understanding of the SSP. before admission to the site. Compliance with the SSP will be monitored at all.times by the SSO. ~. Appropriate personal protective equipment, listed below, will be availabIe and utili2ed by all on-site personnel. Prior to beginning work, the SSO 'will COnduct. a tra[ni'ng session to assure that all are aware of safe work practices, In the training session, perSonnel will be made aware of haZards at the site and will'un'll~e Material Safety Date Sheets for information on compounds.. . . . ~t° be. Mark Magargee will also be respons~le for keeping field notes,, collecting and seeming ..samples, and assUring sample integrity 'by adherence tO Cllaln of C'Xl$tody protocol. All on-site employees will take'reasonable preCautions to avoid unforeseen hazards. After documenting understanding of the SSP, each on'site employee will be responsible for strict adherence to all points contained herein. Any deviation observed will be reported to the SSO and corrected. On-site employees are held responsible to perform only those tas 'ks for which they believe they are qualified, provisions of thl.q SSP are mandatory and personnel associated with 6n-site activities will adhere strictly hereto. Job Hazard Analysis: '" '. ''. Hazards likely to be encountered on-site include thos~ commonly encountered When operating any mechanical equipment, such as the danger of falling objects or moving machinery. Simple precautions will reduce or eliminate risks associated with operating such equipment. - A drilling contractor has been employed to deliver and~ operate all drilling equipmeht. Qualified personnel only will have any contact with this equipment. Al1 'oh-site personnel, including the drilling contractor and his employees, are required to wear hard hats when in close proximity to drilling equipment. Latex s_arnpling gloves will be worn by persons collecting or handling samples to prevent e~osure to contam{nants. Gloves will be changed between samples, and used ones discarded, to avoid cross-contnmlnatiom Proper respiratory equipment will be worn if vapor contamination levels on-site exceed action levels as determined using PID. Action levels requiring respiratory apparatus will be 5 ppm, in the breathing space. Furthermore, no on-site smoking, open flame, or sparks will be permitted in order to prevent accidental ignition. Risk Assessment Summary: Exposure to chemicals anticipated on-site include gasoline, diesel, and benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX). These chemicals represent a hazard because they are moderately to extremely toxic and most are highly-flnrnmable. Term Exposure Limits (STEL's), and Toxicity levels (LDS0, 0ral-rat), are listed below: ~ TLV.. STEL Gaso '!ine Diesel Benzenes Toluene ~ Xylene 200 50 10 100 100 · 300 75 25 150 . ' · 150 · Threshold Limit Values (TLV's), Short all in rog/kg (ppm), To~ciw 4894 5000 4300.' Applicable MSDS forms are attached. Benzene is considered an extreme cancer hazard. Exposure MonitOring Plan: A Photo-Ionization DetectOr (PID) Will be used to monitor vapor' concentrations around the site. Should concentrations exceed TLV's, protective measures will be taken. Passive dosimeter badges will be placed in downwind locations if PID readings indicate high levels of volatile organics in the breathing space. Personal Protective Equipment: '. Personnel on-site will have access to respirators with .organic vapor cartridges. Replacement cartridges will be available on-site as needed.'-,When handli.ng s_amples, the on-site geologist will wear latex gloves. Hard hats will be worn by. all personnel on-site. when in proximity of drilling equipment. Work Zones and Security Measures: :Access to the site will be restricted to authorized personnel. A set of cones, placards, or wide yellow tape, surrounding the site will define the perimeter. The Project M~ager will be responsible for site security. Decontamination Measures: Avoidance of .contamination whenever possible is the best method for Protection. Common sense dictates that on-site persorme! avoid sitting, leaning, or placing equipment on possibly contaminated soil. All personnel will be advised to wash their hands, neck, and face with soap and water before taking a break or leaving the site. 'Respirators will be washed with soap and water following each day's use. Drilling and sampling equipment used ',will be decontaminated by .stem-cleaning. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated before each sample is taken and drilling equipment will be decontaminated before each boring is commenced. General Safe Work Practices: Drillers and other on-site personnel will be briefed each day in "tailgate" meetings as to the day's goals and equipment to be used. Anticipated contaminants and emergency procedures will be reviewed. Appropriate personal protective equipment will be put on and verified correct by SSO, including respirator fit. Drilling and sampling equipment will be stem-cleaned before being brought on-site. Split-spoon sampling equipment will be steam-cleaned before each use. Augers will be steam-cleaned between borings- " The On-Site Geologist will oversee "operations and log borings in consultation wi~ · drillers..The Sample Coordinator. will assure that proper prot0col, is used'at ali times in collecting and handling samples. Training Requirements: The SSO will conduct a pre-site training session which will include all points of MSDS forms, contaminant properties, warning signs, health hazard data, risk from ex-posure, · and emergency first aid. All chemicals to be covered and the SSO will assure that everyone fully understands site hazards. Medical Surveillance Program: According to CFR 29, 1910.120, Paragraph (f), employees who wear respirators 30 days or more during one year or who have been exposed to hazardous substances, or health hazards above established permissible exposure limits are required to be monitored medically. All site personnel will be required to have had a complete chemical physical within the past year. · Record Keeping: · Documentation will be kept on personnel ex-posed to contaminant hazards on the job site according to OSHA regulations. These will include documentation that employees have received training on the SSP, respiratory protection, MSDS forms, and all .emergency procedures. These will be reviewed during the pre-site training meeting. Exposure records on each job will be kept for 30 years to meet requirements. Included will be names and social security numbers of employees, medical evaluations, on-the-job logs from entry to exit, first aid administered, visits on-site by outside persons, and personal air monitoring records. ,Contingency Plans: , In the event of accident, injury, or other emergency, the Project Director, Senior' Project Manager, or other person will notify appropriate government agencies or individuals as follows: .. 1. Kern County Environmental Health Department Mr. Bill Scheide ~ 2. Police, Fire, or Ambulance emergency~ 911 Nearest Emergency Hospital:' Mercy Hospital : 2215 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, C.qlifornia 93301 (805)327-3371 APPENDIX C- · MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS ,ar.=,.,- .----;". air-. "' r ..=ir_.£ .... Ca!! See Re-~.:ir"-"-::? ..:-.__-.i:.. .'-_:_ ~. ' t~.u =~.:,..r _a ax;cs.~. ,... hz:__._ .ca_,., .... a a-cc ~= 5GO .:~= 'ar= S:; ~'-~-- ~ii=i...'._ all usually '-~ %~ . ~n -a = ': '' . ex.Dc ~--2 during _._, ...... -. :'. '-5 ' ::!us,a=, . . . =.~ ..... ('C_'-_ ~ !1-0-?--7), Ia% =e:.hy! :~r _..... _. (~%M !'.-~-~;-3), -=% ~-f¢!~he.xan=, (~%~ !Z~-:.~-7), -=% be."-:~-".=, (C-%M lO0-4l-~) 'a-".~- .=% r-z~Fh:-k=l.~r.=, (C.%~ T.".=, AC~'iH (Z~85-~) -' ! ''- casclin=, i~ ~Oa ~= ': 'a ~aily - 82h='ar '-2'-" =' irri:a.'-icn -¥ -''~u~-- -' · ' ' ~ ,. c=nc~r.-.ra:icns ' ' ir ri :a :i.n~. .:r=!cng~! or r_. -.~_2 ~.raa:hing Ah-'-gi:i=r.-!~ :~aa!-_h ' ..... es w?.i!e ey=,Li'"s a~ C .': %--'. ' See =kin _rri:_:i=. cc_-:=:. . ~_.a . c=n'.~-: .-.ar ~! .!=-..in?. _. .:~s ~::.=.=~, ag.'.:ly ar:ill=ia: o =~. __~--2ia.: ali' r__Fir- :ir.. C~!i ~.. ~a_-..~ ~, Call a '=-::.' ~-'i_._!y. .-~ .:i--'.'-:---i .-_r.-__--i=..' in ¢:e.". -:~i:i~--: .c:.-.c=_,.:r:~.:i_-:-.s. See A~ ",.-~" - .... -~ _,, . ., -r ., ,. : ,-... . U:~a =hit =a~=_r-~a! , cn!y in well Ven:i!a=-od ar=as. ~e.,".:: i'-' .you e.',:=eri=--nc.~- a:'.'..' _ . . -.= ,. ' . __--_-=-.,..~ .'.?.is .:rcduc'. presa.".:-~ ~-"- e?:-:r=-ca ha '~ ~ L: --'uid ye.'-'! '"'~ ":'~" . --.. ....... ev:: _-c.'~-'.::~ , · ' ~ ye.Dc." eve.-, a: !ow =='".=arm. nuts-s, a.,?: (.".:=a'~) which czn ca~.-": .-i--- ar--~ '-'.':n e.~.: !c.~ive vi= ! e_-.c a. i.-'.',-i s ih i a ,,=¢ - -~. "'~ ~a.'_ cn _ir_ ~..' --=.~? scurc_=s suci% at Fil=: !i.-h:~, '- , · ' .:ui.--=--.:ec- =,' , a~":d l__-.ri--al - =::=- ?la~": .--~c:_-.'-: <~-~)<-4~'F'2 . ~ 'i__-' :~---~-': ~ .--ca.=, Wa:ar F.- .ir_. in'.' i-;~n? :his -- :__hal .-.__ a~.'; _.c.i_ -' e..'1 =" . '- ' - -, =,- ',7~ eC. '~ i .~= = "'.'- ...i. W'.i'.i".CU: .-.ru.--ar rru:--:£ - . . - a~uar~:u.~ :$ _:re- c". aq.--i.-.~ ..~ .= ~ =,.-- '= ,.,_,-,-' .-------'- ~. -----,......._ ._'" .... ~ Oi -.'---~"' ,~. c:cfgan c=_.-==:.--.c'i. .=.aad %=-~ _.=ir: ._~5. 'l 27- ns .......... :c. = · ~2--CTiCH U - h'EAL?H . -- . . .-- '."-' . ...,. SECTION , ........... ... ... ::==::--=_:---::: ............................................. came O~ 'ca'mt'aC%, .............. ~ . . Ca.-,--=n-'=d :n .":q--: Natioaal',:las:,an:.~ Camac, ;ac. al-....-,t..~~'"' "~- :.. !,,';;i;;-'..'.;T,~' ";_i;;:.;'~2~-',.;;'7,~-';:;'_-'XiT.;7i~U2;~.Y ..... U~4L%14 ee . t ..... ~ :.:.,..~_, ~ - _- ,~ .~] i/, ~ ?, ,~........ ...... ""3 55~-~' =_ECT.'.ON Z - ??.OBUCT ZD?HT::-!C~TZCN , . Tolu~na '.' ' ' *'. " C,H_CH, : 00108-88,-3 ................. -~. ...... ~;~;~:,~;;;;-z;;.=:_:~.? .... ..:....-.--,~ ~£AL,"~ FL~,.'-~a~'. _ .'TY .~ ¢'~' .'"TT;-''''::h' C.~T~"T ..- 0 i "- O .96 '. ............. S~CTZON ZU - ?:R~ RNO ~CoszON M~ZRRD D~TR sh. 2aLnt: R'C C RO'?) . I 5Ltl' . ........... mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlmmlmmmmmmm 2-5 [ · m'~'gn=ai'~' '" " ' "'':" ' ' '["':' ""'fal: , .- , ' SECTION Ur.'-<RE.~CTiU!T¥ DAT~' Con~itiona tm ~vmf6: h~at, s'our:=~' o~,.ign~-t:-mm, -.., ~. = .=,- "'" a ~. =-' TL'J · . · .. :-:-" ................................... . ~- r ......................... ,LiQUiD . "' F ." = =*- '-'-',~: Fa r.'u~ '---: C,~:tR it:{3 ) ") BR~CAUTZO~AR¥ r.~B~LL ZN~ TL'J :ac ma 2.~.~our --me:'~enc.! TelephOne - i201) =~ '~ ~' N~llonal Rasr~on,,~ C,,nlar ~ lB001 mmm mImmm mmmmmmmmmmmmImimmmmmmmIllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Immmmm mm mm -. rucommend~. SECTION IX - ---D~TRTM~ S~crage Color ~T'ON- ~ X - ~.RR~_.OR.~..ONC~ '~ DRT~ AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Flamm=bl~ liquid FL~HH~BLE LIQUID' !000 LR$. 3.3 FL~mH~BL---