Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHAZ-BUSINESS PLAN 1/16/1997Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste Unified Permit ~ CONDITIONS OF PERMIT ON REVERSE SIDE Permit iD #:: 015-000-001206 TEXACO MING #121176 Issued, by: LOCATION: 3698 MING AVE T.his oermit is issued for the followina: E~ Hazardous Materials Plan [] Underground Storage of Hazardous Materials [] Risk Management Program [3 Hazardous Waste On-Site Treatment 015-000-001206-0001 POWER PLUS/Au~OM0~I~LEAD~? FREE GASOLINE~/' ~ ~': ~ ~;,.~ WASTE OIL 015-000-001206-0002015_000_001206_0003 UNLEADED/AUTOMOZIVE bEAD- 015-000~001206-0004 POWER PREMIUM/AUTOMOTIVE LEAD-FREE GAS '~: -' 015-000-001206-0005 DIESEL :~.-.. '~..~, ~',~':~;; Bakersfield Fire Department OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SER VICES 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Voice (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 Approved by: Expiration Date: Issue Date June 30.. 2003 Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste Unified Permit CONDITIONS OF PERMIT ON REVERSE SIDE PERMIT ID# 015-021001206 TEXACO MING #0700 LOCATION 3698 MING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE POWER PLUS/AUTOMOTIVE WASTE OIL UNLEADED/AUTOMOTIVE LE POWER PREMIUM/AUTOMO This permit is issued for the followinn: iiiiiiiii~ii~e[ground Storage of Hazardous Materials ':~ =..,,~iii~J~,;:,~i.':~ ...-...-,..~J~ TANK PIPING ONITOR METHOD DIESEL SUCTION Issued by: Bakersfield Fire Department OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SER VICES 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Voice (805) 326-3979 FAX (805) 326-0576 Approved by: Expiration Date: June 30, 2000 City of Bakersfield Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave., Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 (805) 326-3979 An upgrade compliance certificate has been issued in connection with the operating permit for the facility indicated below. The certificate number on this facsimile matches the number on the certificate displayed at the facility. Instructions to the issuing agency: Use the space below to enter the following information inthe format of your choice: name of owner; name of operator; name of facility; street address, city, and zip code of facility; facility identification number (from Form A); name of issuing agency; and date of issue. Other identifying intbrmation may be added as deemed necessary by the local agency. This permit is issued on this 2nd day of November, 1998 to: TEXACO MING//0700 Permit//015-021-001206 3698 Ming Ave Bakersfield, California 93309 EXPLANATION · 1 Samplin~ Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING '~Blank 010389e 0 5 10 f · e t TEXACO #61-05'8-0700 BAKERSFIELD, C~LI~ ORNI~ [ SAMPLING LOCATI 0 N S ] Figure 1 Tank 1 O 1' O 0,000 gal Diesel Tracer ID] -9 11. '8 10' Tank 2 O O 10,000 gal Unleaded Tracer ici Tank 0 0 10,000 ga] Plus Tracer O Flll Tank 4 O O I0,000 gal Pr~mium Tracer ID] O Fill .7 CONTINUED (See 2na File) A Subsidiary of Arizona Instrument Corporation January 16, 1997 Mr. Fred Long Texaco R&M 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer Simi Valley, CA 93065 ,. JAN 301997 By. Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco 61058000700 3698 Ming Road/real Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dear Mr: Long: Horizon Engineering and Testing has performed pj:ecision tank tightness tests on the underground tank systems listed on the enclosed report. The testing was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol as required by federal, state, and county regulations for compliance. The testing results, presented on the attached certification page,, will indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed compliance. Included with the certification is a report containing the supporting data. If you should have any questions regarding the attached results or any of the information enclosed, please do not hesitate to call us at (800) 229-2930 or (602) 470-1414. Thank youforchoosingHorizon Engineering and Testing. Best Regards, Wade Pettit Sales Manager bb Enclosures 4114 East Wood Street · Phoenix, Arizona 85040 · (800) 229-2930 · Fax (602) 470-5270 Horizon Engineering. & Testing 4114 East Wood Street - Phoenix, Arizona 85040-1941 · (602) 470-1414 Contract No:[13415-11562-96 Test Date:lJanuary 4, 1996 Customer: I Texaco R&M I Fred Long 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer I Suite 200 [Simi Valley ICA [93065 Site:  ~1058000700 r 13698 Ming Road/Real IBakersfield ICA 193309 Leak Tank Tank Tank Line Test Detector No. P_y_odtLct R es_lz[t l~LeStllt ~ ~/ I 'Diesel Pass Pass Pass v/ 2 Unleaded Pass Pass Pass ~,,3 Unleaded Plus Pass Pass Pass v/4 Premium Pass Pass Pass Technician Name: l Jim Underwood License No.: 197-1231__ State: ICA Technician's Signature Job No. License No. ~Horizon Engtneering& Testing~ Hasstech AcuRite Pressure Line Testing Data Sheet C~'adc Pump Pump Prc~s~x¢ l~CG & Type S~I No. Tc-~ ~ Fail Pass Fail Pa<~ Faa Pa.r; . Faa Pass Faa Pass Fail F1 0 F1 0 0 ~:-.'0.0 0.0 ~tSTING L~K D~ffCTOE TEST NEW LEAK DETECTOR TEST Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Faa Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Faa -~,~1 No. AFTER T.F_STI~G dlspc~s~- I vcrify that thc cl;spcnscr(s) wcx'k nc~mally and that thc~c:.~lc dctcctoc(s) arc not. Icatdng. 14~nag~s signatu~c Tracer Research Job No. 010389h 01/09/97 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound Page 3 Concentration(rog/l_.) 001 001 001 001 001 OO2 0O2 0O2 002 002 A B C R TVHC -A B C R TVHC 003 A 003 B 003 C 003 R 003 TVHC O04 A 004 B OO4 C 004 R 004 TVHC 005 A 005 B 005 C 005 R 005 TVHC 006 A 006 B 006 C 006 R 006 TVHC 007 A 007 B 007 C 007 R 007 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0~0 TVHC (Total Volatile Hydrocarbons) values repotted in milligrams/liter (mg/L). Tracer values reported in milligrams/liter (mg/L). 0.0000 = Not Detected -999999.9999 = No Sample Tracer Research Job No. 010389h 01/09/97 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound Pa~e 4 Conc~ntration(mg/L) 008 A OO8 B OO8 C 0O8 R 008 TVI-IC OO9 A 009 B OO9 C O09 R 009 TVHC 010 A 010 B 010 C 010 R 010 TVHC 011 . ........ A 011 B 011 C 011 R O11 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0~0 TVHC (Total Volatile Hydrocarbons) values reported in milligrams/liter (mg/L). Tracer values reported in milligrams/liter (mg/L). 0.0000 = Not Detected -999999.9999 = No Sample EXPLANATION · l SamplinB Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Louation BUILDING { , ! e e 010389h TEXACO 510-550-0700 9AKERsFIELD, CALIFORNIA l SAMPLINO LOCATIONSI Tank 1 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer [R] at-ag-g9 Tank 2 10,000 gal Unleaded Tracer 0 0 .9 '5 0 0 OF21 11. Tank 3 10,000 ~al Un1. Plus Tracer [B] 10' 0 0 0 Fill 0 0 OF'ill Tank 4 10,000 gal Premium Tracer IA] .7 SUBJECT: PETRO TtTETANK & LtNE'TESTtNG P.O. BOX 191 : CANOG~ PARK, CA- 9/305 213-875-0830 / 818-993-9575 8-t~7 FAX "-~ Annual Electronic/Mechanical Monitoring System Inspection and Meter Calibration DATE: 1/t3/97 LOCATION: 3698 Ming/Real. - SIS#: 61058000700 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dea~ Sir, This is to- certify that the annual, inspection of. the existing Monitoring System was- performed at the above referenced facility. The method used to test the electronic and mechanical menitoring systems is approved by. and.exceeds the-specificatiqns according, to the manufacturer. - R. J. Myers & Sons., Inc. has been contracted by. TEXACO R &M. to insure that their - facilities.cemply with all the rules and regulations.that goverr~the eperationof_ underground storage tanks and product lines. If you have any questions, please-call. Sincerely, R~ J. MYERS& SONS, INC. President RJM/rf · CONT. LIC. #33063~ (B-C6~) SERVING THE-PETROLEUM. INDUSTRY SINCE-1967 Monitor Certification Inspection This letter certifies that the monitor is in place,, the probes are- tn the~ correct position and the operation of the system. FACILITY #: DEALER: ADDRESS: 61058000700 DATE,' t/~3/97 Texaco 3698 Ming BakerSfield, CA 93309 TYPE AND MODEL OF MONITOR: Red Jacket PPM 4000 S/N 21194-P9-A6 ,. SYSTEM FUNCTION TAN K-S P ASS FAlL N/A- USED OIL PASS FAIL X .N/A IN. LINE PASS X FAIL · N/A SUMPS MONITOR PASS FAIL N/A PRODUCT LINES' FILL SUMPS PASS FAIL N/A X WHEN MONITOR IS TURNED OFF OR IN ALARM DOES THE TURBINE SHUT OFF? Y ES NO IS THE-CONSOLE LABELED* CORRECTLY? X YES X C O M M E N TS: No sensor installed in waste oil annular. Wires are terminated at elec "J" box at-back of building. 'No wires-pulled towaste oil:. INSPECTED BY: R.J. MYERS & SONS, INC. TEC H NI C IA N ~Jack Bark R. J. MYERS & SONS, INC.~ SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION PETROTtTE TANK& LINE TESTING P. O. BOX 191 CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA. 91305 818-993-9575 / 818-993-9576 213-87E-083G/818;993;9577 FAX DATE OF SERVICE: 1/13/97 S.S. 8: 61058000700 W. O. 8: 1124774-000 TECHNICIAN. Jim Shine ' SERVICE REQUESTED .BY: Fred Long BILL TO: Texaco R & M 1900 E; Los-Angelcs-Ave.. Simi Valley, CA SERVICE REQUESTED- Annual-electronic monitor inspection and certification. PROBE I,D. 8: ~ Premium 2 Plus' 3-- Unre~Ided 4 Diesel DESCRIPTION OF WORK~ Reprogrammed in-tank probe layout as per Texaco's spec. Printer jams (paper sticks) duringprint out. you have to pull during printing. Premium in-tank probe showing 158.l o.. need to replace. MODEL 8: Veeder-Root TLS-250 SERIAL 8: Not visable due to mounting of unit next to wale SYSTEM ~ERTIFIED SYSTEM PSD- YES (~ NO SYSTEM- YES WASTE OIL- NO SY ST-EM. SEALED LEAK DETECTORS TEST CHART LOCATION Texaco R & M S/S 61058000700 3698 Ming Bakersfield, CA 93309 SERVICE COMPANY R; J. MYERS & SONS, INC.' P. O. BOX 1 91 CANOGA PARK, CA -91-305 DATE: TECHNICIAN PERFORMING TEST: TECH #: Jim Shine 1/13/97 TYPE OF RED JACKET: TOKHEIM: VAPORLESS:. FE PETRO: OTHER: LEAK DETECTORS TESTED (-CHECK R.J~ Transducer/Air Eliminators APPROPtRATE MFG. ~]) TEST INFORMATION GRADE Diesel /I Unleaded/ Plus RESILIENCY (ML) OPENING TimE'. (SEC) TEST LEAK ILATE. MI_/MIN FUNCTIONAL ELEMENT HOLDING PSI METERING PSI PASS OR FAIL PASS. PASS. PASS ~-t-294o3,4s Premium PASS NOTE: BAKERSFIELD FIRE. DEPARTMENT HAZARI~uS MATERIAL DIVISION 1715 CHESTER AVE., BA~RSFIELO, CA (805) 326-3979 93304 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY TEX~cO ~ PERMIT TO OPERATE OPERATORS NAME, Fn;D LgN'& OWNERS NAME 'l'Ewt~;o R~.~'z~,6 NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED__~_ IS PIPING GOING TO'BE TESTED TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS % io~ &~Lt~ uuC~o~ PCuj TA-.~K TESTING COMPANY H.,.~1~, s~,6zwer~,6 w? ADDRESS NAME OF TESTER ~rm ~,~,os~woG0 CERTIFICATION STATE REGISTRATION # DATE & TIME TEST I.q TO BE CONDUCTED t,~ 2., cT DATE 'SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESi'ING ' P.O. BOX 191 CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91305 818-993-9575 / 818-993-9576 213-875-0830 / 818-993-9577 FAX THIS IS TO VERIFY THAT I HAVE BEEN TRAINED IN THE PROPER OPERATION OF MY TANK AND PRODUCT LINE LEAK DETECTION MONITORING SYSTEM. FURTHERMORE, I IIAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED OF TEXACO'S RESPONSE PLAN IN TttE EVENT OF A bIONITOR ALARM CONDITION. fiEALER/MANAGER ~MPLOYEE/TITLE EMPLOYEE/TITLE D R.J. MYERS REPRESENTATIVE MONITOR MAKE & MODEI, MONITOR MAKE & MODEL EMPLOYEE/TITLE DATE TEXACO STATION NUMBER CONT. LIC.//330631 (8-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 .' SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 191 CANOGA PARK, CA 91305 213-875-0830 / 818-993-9575 818-993-9577 FAX SUBJECT: Annual 'Electronic/Mechanical Monitoring System Inspection and Meter Calibration DATE:. 2-!.4r96 S/S Cf: 61058000700 LOCATION: 3698 Ming Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dear Sir, This is to certify that the annual inspection of the existing Monitoring System was performed at the above referenced facility, The method used to test the electronic and mechanical monitoring .systems is approved by and exceeds the specifications according to the manufacturer. R; J. Myers & Sons, Inc. has'been contracted by TEXACO R & M to insure that their facilities comply with all the rules and regulations that govern the operation of underground storage tanks and product lines. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, R. J. MYERS & SONS, INC. Ronald J. Myers, il Vice President RJM/rf R. J. Myers & Sons, Inc. SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P. O. BOX 191 CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91305 818-993-9575 / 818°993-9575 213-875-0830 / 818-993-9577 FAX DATE OF SERVICE: 2-14-96 S.S. 8:61058000700 W .O.#:1121221-000 TECHNICIAN: Ron Norris SERVICE REQUESTED BY: Fred Lorx:j BILL TO: Texaco R & M PROBE ID#: 1900 E. Los Angeles Ave, Suite 200 Simi Valley, CA 93065 SERVICE REQUESTED -Annual electronic monitor certification. T1 Diesel T2 Unleaded T3 Plus T4 Super DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Waste oil annular disconnected. No annular wire pull out of conduit. Certified in line only. MODEL 8: Red Jacket PPM 4000 SERIAL 8:_ 21194-P9 SYSTEM CERTIFIED YES WASTE OIL SYSTEM PSD N/A NO SYSTEM RUNNING NO SYSTEM SEALED NO R. J. Myers & Sons, Inc. SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P. O. BOX 191 CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91305 818-993-9575 / 818-993-9575 213-875-0830 / 818-993-9577 FAX DATE OF SERVICE: 2-14-96 S.S. #:61058000700 .W .O.#:1121221-000 TECHNICIAN: R0nNorris SERVICE REQUESTED BILL TO: Texaco R & M 1900 E. Los Angeles Ave, Suite 200 Simi Valley, CA 93065 SERVICE REQUESTED -Annual electronic monitor certification. BY: Fred Long PROBE ID#: T1 Diesel T2 Unleaded T3 Plus T4 Super DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Test probes and checked calibration. Checked for location and program. Correct tank product code. All systems operating properly. MODEL #: TLS-~ SERIAL #: 206 SYSTEM CERTIFIED WASTE OIL YESd"~'~N~ NO ~;ySTEM PSD SYSTEM SYSTEM SEALED RUNNING NO Monitor Certification inspection This letter certifies that the monitor is in place, the probes are in the correct position and the operation of the system. FACILITY # DEALER: ADDRESS: 61058000700 DATE: 2-14-96 Texaco R & M 3698 Ming Bakersfield, CA 93309 TYPE AND MODEL OF MONITOR PPM4000 RJ SYSTEM FUNCTION TANKS PASS USED OIL PASS IN LINE PASS SUMPS MONITOR PASS PRODUCT LINES FILL SUMPS PASS X FAIL N/A FAIL N/A FAIL N/A FAIL N/A FAIL N/A X ..X X X WHEN MONITOR IS TURNED OFF OR IN ALARM DOES THE TURBINE SHUT OFF? YES X NO IS THE CONSOLE LABELED CORRECTLY? YES X NO COMMENTS:~ No wire for waste oil to hook annular space from monitor. INSPECTED BY: R.J. MYERS .&_~ONS, INC. TECHNICIAN=I*//Ron ~ ~ ' LOCATION 3698 Ming Bakersfield, CA LEAK DETECTORS TEST CHART S/S if: 61058000700 SERVICE COMPANY R.J. MYERS & SONS, INC. P. O. BOX 19i CANOGA PARK, CA 91305 DATE 2-14-96 TECHNICIAN PERFORMING TEST:' TECH if: RON NORRIS TYPE OF LEAK DETECTORS TESTED (CHECK APPROPRIATE MFG [S]) RED JACKET: Accumulator TOKHEIM: VAPORLESS: FE PETRO: SERIAL # GRADE RESILIENCY (ML) OPENING TIME (SEC) TEST LEAK RATE ML/MIN FUNCTIONAL ELEMENT HOLDING PSI METERING PSI PASS OR FAIL NOTE: TEST INFORMATION Unleaded Super Plus _ 13 14 PASS PASS 14 28 PASS PASS ENGINEERING & TESTING A Subsidiary of Arizona Instrument Corporation January 11, 1996 Mr. Fred Long Texaco Refining & Marketing Inc. 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer, Suite 200 Simi Valley, CA 93065 RECEIVED 7 19,% HAZ. MAT. DIV. Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco 61058000700 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dear Mr. Long: HoriZon Engineering and Testing has pedormed pmcjs~n tank tightness tests on the underground tank systems listed on the enclosed report. The testing was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol as required by federal, state, and county regulations for compliance. The testing results, presented on the attached certification page, will indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed compliance. Included with the certification is a raped containing the supporting data. If you should have any questions regarding the attached results or any of the information enclosed, please do not hesitate to call us at (800) 229-2930 or (602) 470-1414. Thank you for choosing Horizon Engineering and Testing. Best Regards, Wade Pettit Sales Manager Enclosures 4114 East Wood Street · Phoenix, Arizona 85040 · (800) 229-2930 · Fax (602) 470-5270 Horizon Engineering & Testing 4114 East Wood Street · Phoenix, Arizona 85040-1941 · (602) 470-1414 CE RTIFICA~JO_N Contract No: 11562-9172-96 Customer: Texaco Refining & Marketing Inc. Fred Long 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer, Suite 200 Simi Valley ,CA 93065 Test Date: January 3, 1996 Site: Texaco 61058000700 Manager 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield CA 93309 Tank No. 1 Tank Tank Line Product Result Be_suit Diesel Pass Pass @ .000 Unleaded Pass Pass @ .005 Unleaded + Pass Pass @ .010 Super Pass Pass @ .005 Technician Name: Mike Farrar License No.: 97-1489 State: CA Technician· Job No. License No. HORIZON ! 2 Pump Type LINE TESTING DATA SHEE']- '~ Customer Location City, State 4 Iso~atk~ Pump Pressure Tc~t Pressure lcd/E/al Levd 1-~me ComPeted Ye~t InterVal Leak Rate (G~'HJ ~o 7~0 EXISTING LEA~ .... ~ & T~ ~ ]~ ~ e~ ~ D~E~OR TEST . Pump ~d ,. A~ ~NG ~mauy and ~at ~e I~k deter(s) are not I~a~ng. ~ ~nag~s Fidd Not~: ~ signaturc BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HA~.ARI3OUS MATERI2%L DIVISION 1715 CHESTER AVE., BAKERSFIELD, CA 93304. (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PEP. FORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY Texaco 6t-058 PERMIT TO OPERATE # 0700 ADDRESS q69R Minp Rn~ OPERATORS NAME Renny Menis OWNERS NAME Texaco R&M (Fred Long) NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 4 IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED Yes TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS ~ 10.00Q . ~ 10.000 Reg,,lnr TA..NK T"£-STING COMPANY Horizon Engineerin~ ., ADDRESS 4114 East Wood Street, Phx. AZ & Testing TEST 'METHOD Tracer Tight NAME OF TESTER Mite Farrar CERTIFICATION # 010.59 STATE REGISTRATION % 97-1489 DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED Dec, 19th A.M. "XPPROVE~: DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICAI~f Tracer Research Job No. 010389g 01/09/96 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound Page 3 Concentration(rog/L) 001 A 001 B 001 C 001 R 001 TVHC 002 A 002 B 002 C 002 R 002 TVHC 003 A 003 B 003 C 003 R 003 TVHC 004 A 004 B 004 C 004 R 004 TVHC O05 A 005 B O05 C 005 R 005 TVHC 006 A 006 B 006 C 0O6 R 006 TVHC 007 A 007 B 007 C 007 R 007 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000O 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0~0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC (Total Volatilc Hydrocarbons) values reported in milligrams/litcr (mg/L). Tracer values reported in milligrams/liter (mg/L). 0.00130 = Not Detected -999999.9999 = No Sample *1 Sampling Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Looation BUILDING 010389~ 0 § I0 ! e e t TEXACO 61-058 0700 Fl/lure ~ Tank I O O 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer ici O Fill .9 '8 Tank 2 O O 10,000 gal Regular Tracer 11. 10' Tank 3 0 0 10,000 gal Plus Tracer iAI O~ll Tank 4 O O 10,000 ga] Premium Tracer _] .7 BAKERSFI~ FIRE DEPARTMF. NT HA~~ MATERIAL DI'VISION 1715 CHESTER AVE.~ 8AKERSFIELD, CA (805) 326-3979 93304. APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY T.x~o PERMIT TO OPERATE OPERATORS NAME Renn¥ Menis NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 4 OWNERS NAME Texaco R&M (Fred Long) IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED Yes TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS ~ l 0. O00 Rog,, 1 ,~ r TA..~rK TESTING COMPANY Horizon EnKineerin~ & Testing TEST 'METHOD Tracer Tight ADDRESS 4114 East Wood Street, Phx. AZ NAME OF TESTER Mite Farrar CERTIFICATION # 01059 STATE RFGISTRATION % 97-1489 DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED pe~, 19th A.M. ._..../~/~: /~; APPROVED" BY: DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICA/TT TEXACO FAX TRANSMITTAL. COVER SHEET NOTE: DO NOT USE BLUE OR RED INK OR PENCIL ON THIS FORM, THEY WILL NOT REPRODUCE DATE: E]URGEN NO. OF PAGES 'J- ~' . MESSAGE TO: /7/0 ' TELEPHONE NO. 3 zd- $ ? ? ? . FAX MACHINE NO. J '7.-c- oj- ~ ~ DEPT./DIV./SUBS. C, ~',,,- ,~.~ f ~ MESSAGE FROM: TELEPHONE NO.L/'~ ROOM NO. DEPT./DIV./SUBS. LOCATION J'~,-~ SENDING DEPT. APPROVAL FAX MACHINE NO. ~'o~.~ ROOM NO. TIME TRANSMI'I-I'ED. [] RETURN ORIGINAL VIA INTER.OFFICE MAIL [] RETURN ORIGINAL CALL SENDER TO PICK UP ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ?,,4,.r- 0.0(3 -oo ,' z CERTIFICATION'OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RDFI U. NO.ERGR.OUND ~TORAGE TANKS ,CONTAININ~ !~. E'i'J~OLEUM I am requLraii to demmnstrila F'maneiai l~sp~nslb~l~ in dm teq~i~d immlnts as It~dliad ia ~ect[~ ~17, ~pl~r !.~ Div. 3, Titb 2~ m . ANt) ~ ~-~ l m i]lJ~a dollars per,x=urreoeo ' ~'~ 2 minion dolMm annul B~TEXACO REFIN.)NG 'lA:ND i~K~JNG Self- TEMCO INC. Insurance 2000 Westchester Ave ~ite Plains, N.Y. 10650 No/e: If you are ~ing ~ ~ate Fu~ as any ~ of ~ de~tmtbn of fl~l ~~1~ ~ ~ ~ su~S~n . Texeco Texaco Star Mart #058-1408 Texaco Star Mart #058'-0988 Texaco #058-0700 Texaco Star Mart #058-0799 hereby ~em~es t~t it ~s in ¢ompliance ~ the requirements of Sect,.ri2807, Texaco #058-0450 · Oak & 24th ' Bakersfield, 93,301 .~'~hite Lane & Potrero Baker.sfield; 93304 .?~'California & Real 'Bakersfiel.d, 93309 i ~aKerszz~l~, l~,~'G0sford & White Lane Baker s field, ,,9 3,3~0, 9 ~'-~"m~21 Stockdale & New Stein Bakersfield, 93309 "'"'~lliam C Bousquette 3eh,or Vice Preslclen{ and ChJei F;nanc~aJ Officer Texaco Irlc 2000 Wes~chester Ave. White Plans NY 10650 Regional Administrators U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Re: Underground Storage Tanks Financial Responsibility Dear Sirs: I am the Chief Rnanciai Officer of Texaco inc. with offices at 2000 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, New York 10650. This letter is in support of the use of the financial test of self insurance to demonstrate financial responsibility for taking corrective action and compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden accidental releases and non-sudden accidental releases in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence-..and two' million dollars ($2,000,000) annual aggregate arising from operating underground storage tanks. Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this financial test or a financial test under an authorized State program by this owner or operator: See Schedule A A financial test is also used by this owner or operator to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in the following amounts under other EPA regulations or state programs authorized by EPA under 40 CFR Parts 271 and 145: EPA Regulations Closure {Sections 264.143 and 265.143) Post-Closure Care {sections 264.145 and 265.145) Liability Coverage (Sections 264.147 and 265.147) Corrective Action (Section 264.101 (b)) Plugging and Abandonment (Section 144.63) Closure Post-Closure Care Liability Coverage Corrective Action Plugging and Abandonment TOTAL 4,252,305 31,842,439 16,000,000 0 252,000 0 0 0 0 0 ~.52,346.844.00 This owner or operator has not received an adverse opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a 'going concern' qualification from an independent auditor on his financial statements for the latest completed fiscal'year. 4. 5. 6. 7. Alternative II Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage* being assured by a test, and/or guarantee Amount of corrective action, closure and post-closure care costs, liability coverage, and plugging and abandonment costs covered by a financial test, and/or guarantee Sum of lines 1 and 2 Total tangible assets Tangible liabilities Tangible net worth Total assets in the U.S. 8. Is line 6 at least $10 million? 9. Is line 6 at least 6 times line 3? 10. Are at least 90 percent of assets located in the U.S? 11. Is line 7 at least 6 times line 37 12. Current assets 13. Current liabilities 14. Net working capital 15. Is line 14 at least 6 times line 3? 16. Current bond rating of most recent bond issue 17. Name of rating service 18. Date of maturity of bond 19. Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the SEC, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Electrification Administration? $2,000,000 $52,346,844 $54,346,844 $25,419,000,000 $15,756,000,000 $9°663,000,000 $12,995,000,000 Yes No _.x _ __X_ _ _. X $6,019,000,000 $5,015,000,000 $1,004,000,000 X A+ A1 Standard & Moody's Poor's August 1, 2024 I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR Part 280.95 (d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. ief Financial Officer Texaco Inc. Date ' RTHur ANDERSEN LLP REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACC~)UNTANTS To Texaco Inc.: We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted'auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of Texaco Inc. and subsidiary companies (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 1994, and have issued our report thereon dated February 23, 1.995. We have not performed any auditing procedures since that date. At your request, we have read the letter dated April 27, 1995, from Mr. William C. Bousquette, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, to the Regional Administrators, Underground Storage Tanks, Financial' Responsibility, United States Environmental Protection Agency and cornpamd the data therein that are specified as having been derived from the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1994, referred to above, with the corresponding amounts in those financial statements. In connection with this procedure, 'no matters came to our attention that caused us to believe that the specified data should be adjusted. This report is furnished solely for the usa of the Company and the Regional Administrators, Underground Storage Tanks, Financial Responsibility, United States Environmental Protection Agency and should not be used for any other purpose. New York, N.Y. Apdl 27, 1995 TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC. ANNUAL INVENTORY RECONCILIATION SUMMARY REPORT Permit/ID Tank # Size Product / /o, ooo -~ / o , oo o ~,~ , I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that: ~All inventory variations for this facility allowable limits for this year. were within __ Inventory variation(s) exceeded the allowable limits during this year. The .source of the variation(s) is not due to an unreported, unauthorized release. List the Month, tank number, and amount of variation for all variations which exceeded the allowable limits during this year. ..... MONTH TANK # AMOUNT OF VARI.ATION/EXPLANATION ,,, 2 3 4 5 Additional incidents......shall be listed on a separate, .at~ached sheet of paper. If the cause of the variation(s) which exceeded allowable limits was a leak, the incident(s) shall be reported no later than the next business day to your local permit implementing agency. An Unauthorized Release Report shall be submitted within five days. The~A~ual Summary Report shall be submitted within 15 days of the ~T/ANK ~q~A/~ O ] ~ DAT ' 0~-93/rng1170g.wpw/4-5 'd'~'] - IWW1 W~8S:90 S6, 6T ~d~ CI~RRECTION N OTIJIJ~ E BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT Location_-'~'~'~.;4cd~ %~, 4, .~ ~' I~ , ~ i'd,, '~ -.,/., o .;-.,. ,,q . Sub Div,~-:~':'r~S /,/~¢~¢, '~ . Blk. ~t You are hereby required to make the following cor~ctions at the above location: Cot. No Completion Date for Corrections ..,,.,,,,, 1~ .-.,,,, ,~...~ -' Date Inspector 326-3979 TAH S__ N_ .,.r_ PECTION I, Bakersfield Fire Oept' RG OUND STORAGE Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME "'~.~'~ O ,~q ~[_~. BUSINESS I.D. No. 215-000 FACILITY ADDRESS ,~c~ r~lwa ~"),,~.. CITY ~?~a.~,~,~,\c~ ZIPCODE FACILITY PHONE No. ~ ° ~gL~-~ INS~EOTION DATE TIME IN TIME OUT INSPECTION ~PE: REQUIREMENTS lc. O~mting F~ Pa~ ld. S~te Sum~rge Pa~ If. W~en Contm~ E~sts ~n ~er & O~mt~ to O~mte 2b. Ap~ov~ Wr~en Ro~ine M~it~ng Pr~ure ~. Tank Int~r~ Test in Last 12 Months ~. Pr~ur~ Piping Int~r~ Test in Last 12 M~ths ~. Suction Piping ~ghtn~s T~t in Last 3 ~. T~t R~uRs Subm~ Within ~ ba~ 3f. DaiN ~sual MonRoHng of Su~i~ Pr~u ~. Manual Invento~ R~ncil~tion Each ~th ~. Annual Invento~ R~iliation Statem~t Su~ ~. Metem Calibmt~ Annually 5. W~kN Manual Tank Gauging R~ds for Small Tanks 6. Monthly Statisti~l Invento~ R~nciliati~ R~u~ 7. Monthly A~at~ Tank Gauging R~uRs 8. Gr~nd Water MonR~ing 10. Continuous Intemtitial Monitoring f~ Doubl~Wal~ Tan~ 13. Continuous Piping ~nRodng In Sum~ 14. A~omatic Pump ShUtoff Ca~bil~ 15. Annual Maintenan~Calibmtion of L~k ~t~i~ Equi~ 16. Leak Det~tion Equipment and T~t Meth~s List~ in L~I ',.17. Wr~en R~ords Maintain~ on S~e i~. Re~ Chang~ in U~g~CondRions to O~mti~nR~ ~,,~ Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem W~hin ~ Da~ lg~ Re~ Una~ho~ Relea~ W~hin 24 Houm ~.~:,. Ap~ov~ UST S~tem Re.irs and U~md~ ~R~ds Sh~ng Cath~ic Prot~ion Ins~ ~. ~ur~ Mon~odng Wells RE-INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR: "~,?.,~ RECEIVED BY: OFFICE TELEPHONE No. FDI~9 ~''~~~C couNTS~ RECEIVABLE ADJUSTMENT UT760401 Account Number May 18~ 1995 Date Esther Dumn From Fire Department - Hazardous Materials Division Department/Division TEXACO MING New Account New Address Close Account Service Chan.qe Other Adjustments X Billing Name 3698 MING AVE Billing Address Site Address Ming Texaco Food Market a Self-Serve Gasoline Fast Lube, Complete Auto Care SAMI DABBAS 3698 Ming Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93309 Parcel # (if Applicable) Landlord Name & Address (If Applicable) ADJUSTMENT Last Billed Correct Billing Adjustment to Effective Date of Billing Change <40.43> 05-01-95 (805) 834-2822 Fax (805) 834-6480 AppmvecJ~ Remarks: WE ARE ADJUSTING OFF ALL OUTSTANDING FINANCE CHARGES BEFORE TRANSFER TO THE NEW SYSTEM. FIRE DEPARTMENT M. R. KELLY FIRE CHIEF CITY of BAKERSFIELD "WE CARE" January 30, 1995 WARNING! 1715 CHESTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, 93301 326-3911 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRED 215-000-001206 TEXACO MING 3698 MING ~V BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Dear Underground Storage Tank Owner: Our records indicate that your business does not have a Certification of Financial Responsibility on file with this office. Please forward either a copy of your existing State approved mechanism to show financial responsibility or else complete the attached Certification of Financial Responsibility form. An attached letter from the State Water Resources Control Board lists the approved financial responsibility mechanisms required to pay for corrective actions resulting from leaking underground fuel tanks. Remember, most tank owners only have to show financial responsibility for at least $10,000 of olean up liability. The Underground Storage Tank Clean Up Fund (USTCF) may be used as the mechanism to cover the remaining accidental release liability. The total amounts of financial responsibility required (check boxes from section A of form) are as follows: If you don't sell product from you tanks, and you pump less than 10,000 gallons per month, check "$500,000 per occurrence". Else, or if you are in the business of selling from your tanks, check "1 million dollars per occurrence". For owners of 101 or more petroleum underground storage tanks, check the "2 million dollar annual aggregate" box. All others need only check the "1 million dollars annual aggregate' box. Please be aware that failure to provide the financial responsibility document to this office within 30 days will result in your Permit to Operate being revoked. (25285.1 (b) California Health & Safety Code). If you have any questions, or would like help in completing the Certification of Financial Responsibility, please contact Howard Wines, Hazardous Materials Technician, at 325-3979. Sincerely, REH/dlm Underground Hazardous Materials Storage Facility CONDIT ON VERSE SIDE Tank Hazardous Piping Piping Number Substance C ~'~.~.i~%-:::-i}::" In ~"{~ii~ii!:!;i'iii:.. il.i!':?T y p e M o'~:i{~]~i ~::i~}?~::~. Type Method · ~:. '"' :? ===================== :i" ? ......:...'" '"" ::: ...;~ Su~ ~u C,~,,I,~e '~::iD.~:.~O .... ' ................... ~:~ '~:~:~::~:~:~:'~ ..... '..::.' -. .............. ...':~ :k"'- .~ ~].'k .::: ..:~:... ... ' ' ...-........::'"":&.:iii:'" :~..:' '::':~:.Li .:i" '"... :~: , :L'.""q.'?:.~.. ~, '~:.:.x'.':': .. ':":":"' ': '"' "' ....... ... :.'"'" ' .. -: .... ~saued .y: .. ."%;~;~:'.::-':.?::-;?;:~:?:.::;i?::'"::~?i?~:'iil;;;;i~.~?~:..:.?.;::::;;'?:"! .?issued To: Bakershela ~re Dept.  HAZARDOUS aATERIALS DIVISION ........................................................... 1715 Cb,stet Ave., 3~a Floor (80s) ~a~-~979 Piping Monitoring ¢~ LQ Approved by: ! ~'~ Ralph E. Huey, Hazardous Materials Coordinator T CO To /~ctr~'~" From ~ ~ Please ~ Pre~rs r~lv for my ~ Attend to signature ~ Note and return ~ Send me info~ation ~ Note and forward r~uir~ to answer to files ~ For your information ~ See (phone) me ~ As per conver~tion re atmch~ ~ Telephone me~e G-44 I"1 As re<lue~ed r'l For your commant~ and suggestions [] Does attached meet with your approval:? I"-I For signature Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc 10 Universal City Plaza Universal City CA 91608 September 13, 1994 Sami & Hanna Dabbas Texaco Retailers 3698 Ming & Real Roads Bakersfield, California 93309 RE: Agreement Letter Concerning Underground Tank Regulations Location #61-058-0700 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dabbas: The underground storage of motor vehicle fuels and waste oil is principally governed by California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7; and by California Code of Regulatiohs, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16 (Underground Tank Regulations), Sections 2610- 2714. , Under Article 2, General Provisions, Section 2620, paragraph (b), the Underground Tank Regulations state, "If the operator of the underground storage tank is not the owner, then the owner shall enter into a written contract with the operator requiring the operator to monitor the underground storage tank; maintain appropriate records; and implement reporting procedures as required by any applicable permit". Based on the existing Lease/Agreement between Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. ("Texaco") and Sami & Hanna Dabbas, Texaco is the owner of the tanks at subject facility and you are the operator of the tanks. Your responsibilities under the Regulations largely parallel your current requirements under your Lease/Agreement with Texaco. It is important for you as the operator of the underground storage tanks to understand that you may be statutorily liable for civil penalties 9f not less than $500 or more than $5,000 per day for: 1) Operating an underground storage tank which has not been issued a permit; 2) Failing to monitor the underground storage tank as required; 3) Failing to maintain records as required; 4) Failing to report an unauthorized release as required; 5) Failure to properly close an underground storage tank. Enclosed for your information are copies of the following documents: 1. California Underground Storage Tank Regulations Californla Underground Storage Tank Regulations, Section 2646 Inventory Reconciliation California Underground Storage Tank Regulations, Section 2712 Permit Conditions California Health and Safety Code, Section 25293 Monitoring of tank system by operator; records; duties of owners and operators California Health and Safety Code, Section 25299 Violations; civil and criminal penalties, operative dates Please acknowledge your receipt of this letter and attachments and your agreement with the terms herein by dating, signing and returning to me the duplicate of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact your Marketing personnel or the undersigned at (818) 505-2483. Sincerely, TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC. F. G. LONG Environmental Specialist I have received copies of the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations and other'applicable regulations. I have read and understand the Operator's responsibilities and my.signature below acknowledges my responsibility for any noncompliance and/or penalties arising out of my responsibilities Dated: ~-/~ failure to adequately carr~o~'t-~ny of my as Operator of the ta~7.~ ~ / vS m ~ nna Dabbas Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc 10 Universal City Plaza Universal City CA 9't608 DATE: TO: November 14, 1994 Sami and Hanna Dabbas Texaco Retailers 3698 Ming & Real Roads Bakersfield, California 93309 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested FROM: SUBJECT- F. G. Long EH&S Coordinator Universal city, CA ENV - INVENTORY RECONCILIATION Annual Summary Report Please make reference to previous correspondence and conversations concerning inventory reconciliation procedures as required by the State of California Water Resources Control Board and'your local underground storage tank (UST) regulatory agency. As operator of the underground tanks at your facility you are required to submit a written statement annually to your local agency concerning your inventory reconciliation records, per Section 2646, Manual Inventory Reconciliation, paragraph (g), of the California Underground Tank Regulations, copy attached. To assist you, enclosed is copy of an "Annual Inventory Reconciliation Summary Report" form. Submission of this form, or a similar written statement, should be completed, signed and forwarded to the proper agency. Bakersfield City Fire Department Hazardous Materials Section 2130 G Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Please note that your inventory reconciliation Summary report is to be submitted "under penalty of perjury." If you have any questions, please contact your Retail Marketing Consultant or myself at (818) 505-2483. Your continued assistance .is appreciated. enclosure copy: TEBates SUMMARY REPORT YEAR Facility: Address: Permit/ID #: Tank # Size Product I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that: Ail inventory variations for this facility were within allowable limits for this year. Inventory variation(s) exceeded the allowable limits during this year. The source of the variation(s) is not due to an unreported, unauthorized release. List the Month, tank number, and amount of variation for all variations which exceeded the allowable limits during this year. MONTH TANK # AMOUNT OF VARIATION/EXPLANATION 1 2 3 4 5 Additional incidents shall be listed on a separate, attached sheet of paper. If the cause of the variation(s) which exceeded allowable limits was a leak, the incident(s) shall be reported no later than the next business day to your local permit implementing agency. An Unauthorized Release Report shall be submitted within five days. The Annual Summary Report shall be submitted within 15 days of the end of each year. TANK OPERATOR DATE 06-93/rngf1709.wpw/4-5 '~ "" "" 0~0 7',~.7 7902 PI.L; 7774 !~':SL~-' A'66- ,~6A-' 6'6~-- ~"~6-'- A~/,4* 6'66- 6'(,~,--f,"66.' 6"66- 6'66- 6'(,6-- 6"66-- 6'66-- 6'66- 6'66- 6'66- 6'66- 6'66- 6'66" 6~66-- 6'6,~- 6'66~ 6'66- (,'66- 6'66- 6'66- 6'~,6- 6~66- 6'6,S-" 6'66.- 6'46- 6'66'-' 6'66- 6'66- L't:i'. $"~l~ L~'t~L- S'~(i-' L'i;:L- ?"OL'- CORRECTIC I NOTICE BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ,-~: Location Sub Div. ~6 gm ?))"~.~ . Blk. . Lot You are hereby required to make ti~e following corrections at the above location: Completion Date fo,' Corrections Inspector 326-3979 UNDERGROUND STORAGE.TANI SPECTIO ..... iiii ~ ~BakerSfield Fire DePt.' ii Bakersfield, CA 9330~ ~ '~,~") ~ BUSINESS I.D. No. 21 S-000 I~ ~ ~ : FAClLIW NAME ~m~ ~ ~ _ FAClLIW ADDRESS ~q~ ~ ~, ~ ClW ~& ZIP CODE ~ ~0 FACILITY PHONE No. ~3[,~--{ -~,,,~-~. INSPECTION DATE --,~ ~ TIME IN TIME OUT ~t0o~ ~,~. INSPECTION ~PE: ROUTINE,,,, ~ FOLLOW-UP ~" REQUIREMENTS la. F~s A & B Su~ lb. F~ C Su~ ld. S~te Sum~rge Pa~ le. S~te~nt of Fi~ial Res~si~l~ Su~ lf. W~en Contm~ E~s~ ~n ~er & O~mtm to O~mte ~. ~1~ O~mting Pete 2b. Appmv~ Wr~en Ro~ine MonE~ing Pr~ure 2c. Una~ho~ Relea~ Resin~ Pan ~. Tank Int~ T~t in Last 12 U0nths ' 3b. Pr~ur~ Piping Int~ri~ T~t in Last 12 M~ths '. ~. Sqction Piping ~ghtn~s T~t in La~ 3 Yearn ~. G~v~ F~ Pipi~ ~ghtne~ T~t in Last 2 Y~m ~. T~ R~uEs Subm~ Within ~ Da~ 3f. DaiN ~sual Mon~ng of S~ Pr~ ~. Manual Invent~ R~ncil~ti~ Each M~th ~. Annual Invento~ R~iliat~ Statement Subm~ ~. Meters Calibmt~ Annually 5. W~ Manual Tank Gauging R~rds fm Small Tanks 6. Month~ Statisti~l Invento~ R~ciliati~ R~u~s 7. Monthly A~atic Tank Gauging ResuEs 8. Ground Water ~nit~ing 9. ~ MonRoring 10. Continuous Intemt~ial Mon~o~ng f~ Doubl~Wal~ Tan~ 1t. M~hani~l Line Leak Det~tom 12. El~ronic Li~ Leak Det~tom 13. Contin~us Piping MonRoHng in Sum~ 14. A~omatic Pump ShUtoff Ca~bil~ 15. Annual Mainten~n~Calibmtion of Leak Det~ Equi~ 16. Leak Det~ion Equipment and T~t Meth~s List~ in L~113 17. Wr~en R~rds Maintain~ on SRe 18. Re~ Changes in U~ggCond~s to O~mti~nR~ Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem W~hin ~ Da~ 19. Re~ Una~ho~ Relea~ W~hin 24 Houm ~. Approv~ UST S~tem Re.irs a~ U~rad~ 21. R~rds Sh~ng Cath~ic Prot~i~ Ins~ ~. S~ur~ ~R~ Wells =. o~ Tu~ RE-INSPECTION DATE . .~ . RE(~EIVED BY: 'NSPE(~TOR: ~'~, ,~'~'~__~,,~,~.,~_ __"~'_ ~'.~----~?.,...- OFFICE TELEPHONE No. ~, ~VT? FD 1~9 iii,.~iUa~erground Hazardous Materials Storage ~F~acility State i.D. No. o,~o, ..??:?'?;!~;; :i,;?::?~ii:::::;iii i;i;?.?.:?:,,Perm~t No. ," CONDiTiONS ;::!;~ili~p:~!!~:~'i~;~;~:~hEVERSE SIDE Number Issued By: Approved by: ~." .. y:.. ~:"]~ ..:: :' - "...'::.:..: .. E~E~::'.:i~? ...' .. : .: ..' .. :: .. ~'; ]: ~:7:: ~' J i~ -."'"..~ - 17t5 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA' 93301 (805) 326-3979 Ralph E. Huey, Hazardous Materials Coordinator Valid from: Piping Monitoring CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ,.Ty FOR.UNDERGROUND STORAGE,?ANKS CONTAINING PETROLEUM ,6. I am required to demonstr~t~ F'man~iai Reapons~biity in the required amounts as specified in Section 2~07, Chapter 18. Div. 3, Title 23, CCR: ~ 500,000 dollars per oecuITenee ['~ 1 million dollars annual M~resate [~] 1 million dollars per occurrence -' [-~ 2 million dollars annul a~regate B. 'I'EXACO RERNING AND MARKEflNG INC. hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Section 2807, Article 3, Chapter 18, Division 3, 7-/tie 23, California Code of Regulations. The mechan/srns used to demonstrate financial responsibility as required by Section 2807are as follows: Se!£- ~EXACO TNC. Insurance 2000 Westchester Ave. ~tite ?la±ns, N.Y. ~0650 Note: If you are using the State Fund as any part of your demonstration of financial responsibility, your execution and submission of th~s cer~fication also certifies that you are in comp~lance with all condit/ons for part~cipa#on in the Fund. ¥ Texaco #058-1405 Bakersfield, 93301 ~' Texaco Star Mart #058-1408 F~~hite Lane & Potrero Bakersfield, 93304 F~"'°~Texaco Star Mart #058-0988 ~'California & Real ,~ .... Bakersfield, 93309 ~/~*~vTexaco #058-0700 3698 Ming & R~§~09 Bakersfield, .... ~'~*"~* ~.Texaco Star Hart: #058-0799 ~)~5~Gosford & ~hit:e Lane Bakersfield, ,93309 S~tJa~'e of W~mem oe No~ar~ Da~ Na~e of WiMem ot Nolm~ Texaco #058-0450 c~'-~21 Stockdale & New Stein Bakersfield, 93309 January 18, 1995 Iilstrument Hodzon Engineering &Tesdng Mr. Fred Long Texaco Refining & Marketing Inc. 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer, Suite 200 Simi Valley, CA 93065 J 'H qZ ' A r OtV. Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco 61o058-0700 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield, CA 93309 Dear Mr. Long: Horizon Engineering & Testing, a wholly owned subsidiary of Arizona Instrument Corporation, has performed precision tank tightness testing on underground storage tanks at the above referenced location ~using the Tracer. Tight® method. Thetesting was Ped°rmed in accordance with Tracer Tight® protocol, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision tank test. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test to verify the results and certify the tank system. The results of testing shown on the following certification page indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis and condensed data sheet(s). If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us at (800) 229-2930 or (602) 470-1414. Sincerely Yours, Environmental Technologies Enclosures 4114 East Wood Street Phoenix AZ 85040-1941 USA (602) 470-1414 Fax (602) 470-1888 Horizon Engineering & Testing 4114 East Wood Street · Phoenix, Adzona 85040-1941 · (602) 470-1414 CERTIFICATION Contract No:19172-3960-95 Test Date:IJanuary 11, 1995 Customer: iTexaco Refining & Marketing Inc. iFred Long 1900 East Los Angeles Avenue & Erringer, ~ 200 s~[~rv~- c~ 193o~5 Site: 761-058-0700 u~n~ 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield ~C_A_ 193309 Leak Tank Tank Tank Line Test Detector 1 ' Diesel .... Pass PasS@ :005r Pass 2 Regular Pass Pass @ .005 Pass 3 Unleaded + Pass Pass @ .000 Pass 4 Premium Pass Pass @ .010 Pass ,/ Technician· Name: [Mike Farrar License No.: [94-1489 State: [CA Technician'S signature HORIZON LINE TESTING DATA SHEET Job ,o. Lice.se .o. I'~'~-!'~s'~ I I Purr~ Type ls~atien Pump Pressure Test Pressure InRial Level Final Levd Tkne Con~eced Test L~ t e~,al Leak Rate (G~) MFG & Type Serial No. ! Test ~ Test GTH Customer Location City, State 4 5-0 ~ .sz:, .o~o .Ob~ ,o&oo . o~7~ -' ~0 Do Bo , ~o~ , oo~ ,~o , o/. EXISTING LEAK DETECTOR TEST NEW LEAK DETECTOR TEST 6~CG & Type ",. ~'~., AFTER TESTING ¢~,~. 't'e~ N0 No ~o ~e~ ~o ~es ~o ~es ~o ~erationat ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I V~i~ that the ~ensec(s) w~k n~mally and that t~ l~k ~tect~(s) ace not leaking. Managers signature Field Notes: HAZARDOUS MATERIAL' DIVISION 1715 CHESTER AYE..'BAKERSFIELD, tA 93304. . (805') 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY ~-~=~ &L-o~. o-~ PERMIT TO OPERATE # NUMBER OF TANKS.TO-BE TESTED CONTENTS TEST 'METHOD ---7-~, NAME OF TESTER ,~,~ STATE REGISTRATION DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE COI~DUCTED .GgATURE OF 'APPLZCAh'T Tracer Research Job No. 010389f Tra~Research Corporation 1/11/95 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound 001-10 A 001-10 D 001-10 F 001-10 N 001-10 TVHC Page 1 Concentration 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 002-10 A 002-10 D 002-10 F 002-10 N 002-10 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003-10 A 003-10 D 00.3-10. F 003-10 N 003-10 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004-10 A 004-10 D 004-10 F 004-10 N 004-10 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 005-10 A 005-10 D 005-10 F 005-10 N 005-10 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 006-10 A 006-10 D 006-10 F 006-'10 N 006~10 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected -99999999999 = No sample TraCer Research Job N©. t/11/95 Location 007-10 007-10 007-10 007-10 007-10 010389f CONDENSED DATA Compound A D F N TVHC Reeearch Corporation Page 2 Concentration 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected -99999999999 = No sample EXPLANATION *I Sampling Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING 0 5 l0 { , } f e e t Blank TEXACO 61-058 0700 Figure I G __- Tank 1 O O 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer [^] O Fill .9 Tank 2 0 0 10,000 gal Regular Tracer IN] O Fill '8 [;Blank 11. 10' Tank 3 O O 10,000 gal Plus Tracer ID] O Fill Tank 4 O O 10,000 gal 'Premium Tracer [~] O FIII .7 AZI ENV: TECH.GROUP ID:602-470-5270 DEC 19'94 BA.KERSF~ZLD FTRE. DEPARTt, fENT F, AZAR,DOU'S V, ATERIAL DFV]:S:i:ON 1715 CHESTER AVE..'BAKERSFIELfl, ~A . (805) 326-39'/9 93304, 12.:~$ No.OiO P.02 AI:'PLZC&TZO~ TO PERFORM A TZGX'ITNE$S TEST PEiU4IT TO OPERATE # NUMBER OF TANKS.TO BE TESTED · CONTENTS STATE KEGTSTRATION $~7-/-~'~a .... £- / - fi / .~ATE · ,. CERTIFICATE UNDERGROUND STORAGE T SYSTEM TESTING NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION ~ 8906 WALL STREET, SUITE 306 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 (512) 719-4633 FAX (512) 719-4986 TEST RESULT SITE SUMMARY REPORT TEST TYPE: Alert.. 1000 TEST DATE: October 23, NJ E 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBERi 913986 CLIEN~ TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC SITE: TEXACO #61-058-0700 ATTN F. G. LONG 3698 MING AVE 10 UNIVERSSAL CITY PLAZA, 4TH FLOOR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608 ATTN: FRED LONG The following tests were conducted at the site above in accordance with all applicable portions of Federal, NFP A and local regulations. Tank Tests TK1 DIESEL 10,000 91.00 PASS -0.008 PASS TK2 UNLEADED 10,000 91.00 PASS -0.013 PASS TK3 PLUS 10,000 91.00 PASS -0.047 PASS TK4 PREMIUM 10,000 91.00 PASS 0.001 PASS Line and Leak Detector Tests · K1 D~ESEL 0.0 0 3 P YES PASS TK2 UNLEADED 0 . 005 P YES PASS TK3 PLUS 0 . 005 P YES PASS · TK& PREMIUM 0 . 005 P YES PASS NDE Customer S~'tvice Representative~: FRANK MILLER NDE appreciates the opportunity to serve you, and looks forward to working with you in the future. Please call any time, day or night, when you need us. Test conducted by: HENSLEY BARBOUR Reviewed: INDIVlD~ ~ ~--~-'--~ ~'~-"~,~ E '~'0-~ O'~R~~TANK/LINE/LEAK DETECTOR T REPORT TESTDATE: October 23, 1994 WORKORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEXACO R~FINING AND Z?~RF,~TIN(3, INC SITE: TEX~CO #61-058-0700 Tank ID: TK1 Product: DIESEL Capacity in gallons: lO, 000 Diameter in inches: 91.00 Length in inches: 360 Material: FIBEReLASS Tank: NO Manifolded Vent: NO V~: NO Bottom tqtop fill in inches: 3.34.0 Bottom to grade fill in inches: 3.28.0 Fill pipe length in inches: 4,3 o 0 Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4,. 0 Stage I vapor recovery: NOt~: Stage II vapor recovery: NOrm Test method: Alert 3-000 Psi at tank bottom: Fluid level in inches: 70.50 UFT/OF~ OFT Fluid volume in gallons: 8,33.5 Water level in inches: 0.00 Test time: 22:4,7-00:s0 Number of thermisters: Specific gravity: 0.8 s 0 Water table depth in inches: Determined by (method): Z~O~R WSLL Leak rate in gph: -0 o OO8 RESULT: PASS Test method: Alert 1050 Test time: 02: 50-03: 05 Ullage volume: 1,685 Ullage pressure: 1.50 RESULT: PASS DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Time of test 1: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 2: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 3: Temperature: ..~ Flow rate (cfh): New/passed Failed/replaced detector detector Test method: FTA Make: RED JACKET Model: P.L.D. S/N: 4,1189 9019 Open time in sec: 3. oo Holding psi: 12 Resiliency cc: 34,5 Test leak rate ml/min: 189.0 Metering psi: · 26 Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo RESULT.' PASS FIBERGLASS 2.0 Material: Diameter (in): Length (ft): Test psi: Bleedback cc: Test time (min): Test 1: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 2: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 3: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Final gph: RESULT: 50 30 30 00:05 50 2 00:15 50 2 00:25 50 1 0.003 PASS Test type: AcuRi~e Pump type: PRESSURE Pump make: RED JACKET 8906 WALL STREET SUITE 306, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 I512/ 719-4633 INDIVI_D~.NK/LINE/LEAK DETECTOR ~S_T REPORT NDE TESTDATE: October 23, 199& WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC SITE: TEXACO #61-058-0700 Tank ID: TK2 Product: UNLEADED Capacity in gallons: 3.0,000 Diameter in inches: 91. oo Length in inches: 360 Material: FIBERGLASS Tank: NO Manifolded Vent: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 135.0 Bottom to grade fill in inches: 3.30.0 Fill pipe length in inches: 44. o Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4,. 0 Stage I vapor recovery: DUAL Stage II vapor recovery: BALANCE V/R: NO Test method: Alert, 1000 New/passed Psi at tank bottom: detector Fluid level in inches: ?4.50 Test method: FTA UF--F/OF'E U3"z' Make: Z~ED JACKET Fluid volume in gallons: 8, ?21 Model: x. L. D. Water level in inches: 0.00 S/N: 30292 7985 Testtime: 23:05-01:12 Open time in sec: 3.00 Number of thermisters: Holding psi: 12 Specific gravity: O. ?40 , Resiliency cc: 345 Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate ml/min: 189.0 Determined by (method): ~ONTa WELL Metering psi: 26 Leak rate in gph: -0. 013 Calib. leak in gph: 3.00 RESULT: PASS RESULT: PASS Failed/replaced detector Test method: Alert 1050 Test time: 03:15-03:30 Ullage volume: 1,2?9 Ullage pressure: 1.50 RESULT: PASS DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Time of test 1: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 2: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 3: Temperature:. Flow rate (cfh): Material: FIBEaGLASS 2.0 Diameter (in): Length (ft): Test psi: Bleedback cc: Test time (min): Test 1: sta~l time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 2: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 3: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Final gph: RESULT: 5O 5O 3O O0:&O 50 5 00:50 50 3 01:00 50 2 0.005 PASS Test type: AcuRite Pump type: PRESSUaE Pump make: TOKHEIM 8906 WALL STREET SUITE 306, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 (5121 719-4633 INDIVI~INE/LEAK DETEC'FOR_.~._~.~E. PORT N~E TESTDATE: October 23, 1994, WORKORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEX~CO R~FINING ~ ~TING, INC SITE: TEMCO %61-058-0700 Tank ID: Product: P~.us Capacity in gallons: lO, 0oo Diameter in inches: 91.00 Length in inches: 3~o Material: ~.R~LASS Tank: NO Bottom to top fill in inches: 134.5 Bottom to glade fill in inches: $.29.0 Fill pipe length in inches: 43.5 Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Stage I vapor recovery: DeAL Stage II vapor recovery: Sa.T.,,~C~. Manifolded Vent: NO V/R: NO Test method: Alez:C $.000 New/passed Psi at tank bottom: detector Fluid level in inches: '/4,. oo Test method: F?A UFT/OFT.' OF? Make: aZD JACKZ? Fluid volume in gallons: 8, '/55 Model: Water level in inches: 0. oo S/N: 30292 '/984 Test time: 23:1'/-02: 38 Open time in sec: 3.00 Number of thermisters: Holding psi: 12 Specific gravity: 0 .'/¢0 Resiliency cc: 320 Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate ml/min: 189.0 Determined by (method): MOt~-~R W~.~. Metering psi: 26 Leak rate in gph: -0.04'/ Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo RESULT: PASS RESULT.' PASS Failed/replaced detector Test method: Alerff, 1050 Test time: 03: 45-04: 00 Ullage volume: 1,245 Ullage pressure: 1.50 RESULT: PASS DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Time of test 1: · Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 2: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 3: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): FIBERGLASS 2.0 Material: Diameter (in): Length (ft): Test psi: Bleedback cc: Test time (min): Test 1: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 2: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 3: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Final gph: RESULT: 50 50 30 01515 50 5 01:25 50 3 01:35 5O 2 0.005 PASS Test type: AcuRite Pump type: PaESSURE Pump make: TOKHEIM 8906 WALL STREET SUITE 306, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 (5121719-4633 INDIVI~LEAK DETECTO~ REPORT NDE E ENVIRONM -' - TESTDATE: October 23, 1994, WORKORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEZACO PJ~FIN]:N(~ ~ ~TINO, INC SITE: TEMCO %61-058-0~00 Tank ID: ?K4 Product: p~'rOM Capacity in gallons: lO, 000 Diameter in inches: 91o oo Length in inches: 360 Material: F~E~GLASS Tank: NO Manifolded Vent: NO Bottom tq top fill in inches: 136.5 Bottom to grade fill in inches: 131.0 Fill pipe length in inches: 45.5 Fill pipe diameter in inches: 4.0 Stage I vapor recovery: Stage II vapor recovery: V/R: NO . Test method: Ale:cb 1000 New/passed Failed/replaced Psi at tank bottom: detector detector Fluid level in inches: 62. oo Test method: ~"~A UFT/OF'E UF? Make: RED JACKET RED JACKET Fluid volume in gallons: 7.2 5 8 Model: x. L.D. D. L. D. Waterlevel in inches: 0.00 S/N: 21293 8674 Test time: 23:33-01:33 Open time in sec: 3.00 Number of thermisters: Holding psi: 12 Specific gravity: 0.760 Resiliency cc: 300 Water table depth in inches: Test leak rate ml/min: 189.0 Determined by (method): MOt~Ta WaLL Metering psi: 26 Leak rate in gph: 0. 001 Calib. leak in gph: 3. oo 3. oo RESULT: PASS RESULT.' PASS FAIL Test method: Alerff. 1050 Test time: 04.. 15-04 .- 30 Ullage volume: 2,742 Ullage pressure: 1.50 RESULT: PASS DATA FOR UTS-4T ONLY: Time of test 1: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 2: Temperature: Flow rate (cfh): Time of test 3: Temperature:_.. Flow rate (cfh): FIBERGLASS 2.0 Material: Diameter (in): Length (ft): Test psi: Bleedback cc: Test time (min): Test 1: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 2: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Test 3: start time: finish psi: vol change cc: Final gph: RESULT: 50 45 30 01~45 50 5 01=55 50 3 02=05 50 2 0.005 PASS Test type: AcuRi~e Pump type: PRESSURe. Pump make: TOKHEIM 8906 WALL STREET SUITE 306, AUSTINl TEXAS 78754 /5121719-4633 DE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPO ION 8906 WALL STREET, SUITE 306 ~ AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 NDE (512) 719-4633 I i FAX (512) 719-4986 TEST DATE: October 23, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEXACO REFINING AND NARKETING, INC SITE: TEXACO #61-058-0700 COMMENTS PARTS REPLACED I Extended life d£ephram leak detector HELIUM PINPOINT TEST RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE) [!i~[ii~i~i[ii~i i iiiiiii:!~i~ [iiiii~iii i i[![![i[~i ii ii iii [ii,ii ii [![i [~[~[iii!ii:ii[i!~i~i~:i~=:i[[[![ ii ii ~i i[i[~i![ii[[[!!iiii[ ![ i i:i i iiiiiiiii[ii[iii[ ![~ [~ii iii[iii ii ii i ii~i i i~i:i~i!~i~[i ~[i~i ~[[iii[ii!i~ ~ii~[~[ [~ [~ii[ ~!~i~:~i:[~ [:i~;~[iiiiii[ii[:!~i~:[iiii ii ii[iii [[[[ii~i~[iiiii~i~[iiii[~ii~i:i~ SITE DIAGRAM NDE ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION NDE AUSTIN, TEXAS 78754 (512) 719-4633 FAX (512) 719-4986 TESTDATE: October 23, 1994 WORK ORDER NUMBER: 913986 CLIENT: TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC SITE: TEXACO #61-058-0700 TEXACO #61-058-0700 3698 MING AVE. BAKERSFIELD,CA 93309 W/O #913986 10/23/94 DIESEL ~ UNLEADED....~ PlUS PREMIUM MING AVE. IVi~NITOR SYSTEM CERTIFICA~)N ~' NDLmENVIRONMENTAL COR POI::PRTION Test Date: Client: 10/23/94 TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC ATTN F. G. LONG UNIVERSAL CITY , CA. 91608 Site: Work Order #: 913986 TEXACO #61-058.0700 3698 MING AVE BAKERSFIELD , CA. 93309 Overall System Operation The pumps; Shut down automatically if the system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electronically disconnected. The system has functioning audible and visual alarms. The circuit breaker for the system is properly identified. The system is certified operational per manufacturer's performance standards. Product Tank Monitoring: Make: [ ] Double wall [ X] Single wall Model: How many: Operational: (Automatic tank gauge, annular space vapor probe, annular space liquid probe, hydroguard system, vadose zone monitor well, groundwater monitor well) [ X] Yes [ ] No IX] Yes [ ] No [X] Yes [ ] No IX]yes [ ]No [ ] Yes [ ] No Comments: Product Piping Monitoring: [ ] Double wall [ ] Single wall Make: Model: Type: How many: (Piping sump liquid sensor, piping trench liquid sensor, electronic line pressure sensor, mechanical line leak detector) Operational: [ ] Yes [ ] No Comments: Other Monitoring Systems Make: Model: Type: How many: Operational: [ ] Yes [ ] No Comments: Technician: HENSLEY BARBOUR Technician Signature: BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 1715 CHESTER AVE., BAKERSFIELD, CA (805) 326-3979 93304 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST PERMIT TO OPERATE ~ OPERATORS NAME'~/}c o NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED OWNERS NAME ~,~CD IS PIPING GOING TO' BE TESTED TANK~ VOLUME F /o CONTENTS Tm < TESTING TEST METHOD NAME OF TESTER~,~~;Z~ CERTIFICATION STATE REGISTRATION ~ //~ DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED /~-2~ - ZZ ,' oC~ DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 3007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 ! 818-768-2128 FAX SUBJECT: ANNUAL ELECTRONIC/MECHANICAL MONITORING SYSTEM INSPECTION AND METER CALIBRATION DATE: 9/13/94 LOCATION: 61058000700 3698 MING BAKERSFIELD~ CA 93309 Dear Sir, This is to certify that the annual inspection of the existing Monitoring System was performed at the above referenced facility. The method used to test t~e electronic and mechanical monitoring systems is approved by and exceeds the specifications according to the manufacturer. R. J. Myers & Sons, Inc. has been contracted by TEXACO R & M Inc. to insure that their facilities comply with all the rules and regulations that govern the operation of underground storage tanks and product lines. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ~/~. MYERS & S~S~ INC. Vice President RJM:MLS CONT. LIC. #330631 (B-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STATION .CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING' P.O. BOX 3007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX TEXACO.R & M INC. 10 Universal city Plaza Universal City, Ca 91608 Attn: Fred Long STATION LOCATION: 61056000700 93309 For your information and reCords, the leak detection system at the above referenced site was certified on 9/13/94 by R. J. Myers & Sons, Inc. as indicated below. PRODUCT LINE TYPE ?MS 800 MONITOR __Non Existing X Operational Non Operational TANK T~PETLS 250 MONITOR __Non Existing X Operational Non Operational WASTE OIL TANK TYPE PMS 800 MONITOR Non Existing X Operational Non Operational Please feel free to contract our office for any questions you may have regarding your leak detection equipment. Sincerely, R. J. MYERS & SONS, INC. Vice President RJM:MLS CONT. LIC. #330631 (B-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK.& LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 3OO7 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA'. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126' 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX DATE OF SERVICE 9/13/94 SS~__O.5_~2f~ WO# ~114217-000 TECHNICIAN: ERICH WEINER SERVICE REQUESTED BY: FRED LONG BILL TO: TEXACO R & M 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY~ CA SERVICE REQUESTED: ANNUAL ~ERTIFICATION PROBE I.D.#: LINE;:~.FAK SENSOR 1 SUPER ' / 1.WASTE OIL 2 PLUS;.:. ~ 3 UNLEADED 4 DIESEL DESCRIPTION OF WOR_K: TEST LINE LEAK DETECTOR AND WASTE OIL SENSOR FOR PROPER OPERATION. ALL SYSTEMS OPERATING PROPERLY AT TIME OF INSPECTION MODEL# PMS 800 SERIAL# 1065 SYSTEM CERTIFIED NO WASTE OIL (~ ~O RECEIVED AI.~RM CALL LEFT FOR GOB SITE: ARRIVED AT GOB SITE: LEFT GOB SITE: RETURNED TO BASE: SYSTEM PSD SYSTEM RUNNING ~ NO ~ NO SYSTEM SEALED NO CONT. LIC. #330631 (B-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STATION cONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 30O7 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126' 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX DATE OF SERVICE 9/13/94 SS# 61058000700WO# 1114217-000 TECHNICIAN: ERICH WEINER SERVICE REQUESTED BY: FRED LONG BILL TO: SERVICE TEXACO R & M 10 'UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY~ CA REQUESTED: ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PROBE I.D.#: IN-TANK 1DIESEL 2 UNLEADED 3 PLUS 4 SUPER DESCRIPTION OF WORK: CHECK EACH PROBE FOR PROPER OPERATION. ~ PROBES CALIBRATED WITHIN TOLERANCE MODEL#. TLS 250 SERIAL# 509 SYSTEM CERTIFIED SYSTEM PSD SYSTEM RUNNING NO LEFT FOR JOB SITE: ARRIVED AT JOB SITE: LEFT JOB SITE: RETURNED TO BASE: CONT. LIC. #330631 (B-C§1) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 CONTRACTOR R.J. MYERS , INC, I PRODUCT DATE 9/13/94 DIESEL ~ TECHN~ClANERICH WEINER [ CUST°~A("'D 6~'00 JLOCATION 3698 MING BAKERSFIELD, CA SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # llO1 22089 3036 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE' WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER II LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE 41189 9019 MODEL 116-030 X MODEL 116-017 MODEL 116-011A MODEL 585PM PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC DLD 5SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD ROUND HEAD SQUARE HEAD PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE OTHER COMMENTS GALLONS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER III GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 29 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD 100 ML IV PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE 2 SEC. V 3 GALLON PER. HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 250 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES X NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES X NO C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE'OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO X LEAl( DETECTOR TEST PASS ~___ FAIL PIIRPOFIA VAPORLESS FORM 8ROA ~. LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE - TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS ]II GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE psig. PRESSURE STEP TEST.SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GA, L PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. I'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES LEAl< DETECTOR TEST PASS ~__~ FA LI I LUI CONTRACTOR R.J. MYERS & SONS~ DATE -- . I PRODUCT 9/'13/94 'l TECHNICIAN ERICH "WEINER ~U - LI:AK Ul= I I=.~ i UH L, rlI=~L~,..~ ~CUSTOMER 61 OSRO~C~FI / TEXACO : I LOCATION 3698 MING BAKERSFIELD SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 37013 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSEF~ DOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE SN 30292 7985 REDJACKET I J REDJACKET I I REDJACKET L~TOKHEIM UOTi~ER I MODEL 116-030 MODEL 116-017 MODEL 116-011A MODEL 585PM PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC DLD 5SEC DLD 2SEC X HEX HEAD HEX HEAD ROUND HEAD SQUARE HEAD - J116-036 PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE GALLONS LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 29 pslg. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD 1 OD ML IV PRESSURE STEPTEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE . , 2 SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 250 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES X NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YESES_ NO 3) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE'OR PLACE BOTTOM -- SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES.., ,X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATI. NG PRESSURE YES NO X LEAl( DETECTOR TEST PASS FAILJ P~IRPOFIA VAPORLESS FORM LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM'PRODUCT LINE - TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS ]][]~ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE __ psig. PRESSURE STEP TEST.SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. ~ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TQ APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAl< DETECTOR TEST PASS~___ FAIL LUI IDATE I TECHNiCiAN ]~TCH WEANER CONTRACTOR R.J.MYERS'- & SONS.; INC. I PRODUCT 9/].3/94 PLOS ~OMER ' ~'~:"'-' ,o s; oo 3698 MING 'BAKERSFIELD, CA' 93309 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL// 37012 RED WAYNE. A.O. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSER DOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECKTYPE RED JACKET I J MODEL 116-030 PLD-2SEC , HEX HEAD PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE 30292 7984 MODEL 116-017 MODEL 116-011AJ I MODEL 585pM ~ DLD 2SEC DLD 5SEC I I DLD 2SEC SQUARE 1i6~035 HEX HEAD ~ ROUND HEAD I HEAD ' GALLONS LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER []I GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 29 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD 100 ME IV PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE 2 SEC. V 3,GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2.50 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1 '/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES, X NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES,..X NO 3) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE'OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO ~ LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~_~ FAILJ J VAPOR[ ESS FORM BSOA C~ LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE - TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS ]]'I GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE __ psig. ]'V PRESSURE STEP TEST.SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC 3 GALLON PER HOUR. LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEA/< DETECTOR TEST PASS ~.._~ FAILJ J L. IJ i OOU ' [CONTRACTOR ·/ 'R~,T. MYERS &' SONS. INC. I DATE q PFIODU(~T I 9/13/94 I TEGHNIGIAN [ ~ICH ~IN~ CUSTOMER TE-~ACO 61 osgo LOCATION 3698 MING BAKERSFIELD, CA ]~' SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL It 37014 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETt DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE 20189 5085 RED JACKET RED JACKET RED JACKET TOKHEIM OTHER MODEL 116-030 MODEL 116-017 MODEL 116-011 ^ MODEL 5BSPM PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC DLD 5SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD ROUND HEAD SQUARE HEAD PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS 'EST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD PRESSURE STEPTEST 29 psig. 100 ML WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE 2 SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST_2~)____ML B) c) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES X DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES X CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE 'OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE NO NO YES X NO YES NO X / YES NO. X PASS ~_~ FAILI J LEAK DETECTOR TEST LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE - TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS HI[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE __ psig. PRESSURE STEP TEST.SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/V~ RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPlt TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAl< DETECTOR TEST PASS~_.J FAILJ J PtIRPORA YAPORLESS FORM 88OA ~') I BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DMSION PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY Permit No.: . 280009C State ID 'No.: 16201 Issued to: RENNY'S TEXACO STATION Location: 3698 MING AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Owner~. TEXACo REFINING AND MARKETING INC. P.O. BOX 7812 PASADENA, CA 91608 Operator:. RENNY'S TEXACO STATION 3698 MING AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 Facility Profile: Year Is Piping Tank No. Substance Capacity Installed ~ 1 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1984 YES 2 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1984 YES 3 GASOLINE 10,000 GAL 1984 YES 4 DIESEL 10,000 GAL 1984 YES 5 WASTE OIL 550 GAL 1985 NO This permit is granted subject to the conditions listed on the attached summary of conditions and may be revoked for failure to adhere to the stated conditions and/or violations of any other Stot~ or Federal regulations. Issued by: Ralph E. Hu~ Title: Hazardous Materials Coordinator Issue Date: JULY 1, 1991 Expiration Date: JULY 1, 1994 POST ON PREMISES NONTRANSFERABLE A Subsidiary of Arizona Instrument Corporation Fred Long Texaco R & M 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor UniversalCity, CA 91608 'JUL 2 '8 HAZ. MA]'. DIV. Re: Tank Tightness Tests - 3698 Ming Road/Real TexaCo 61-058 0700 , Bakersfield , CA July 12, 1993 · Dear Fred, Precision'tests were pedormed on underground storage tanks at the above location USing the .Tracer. Tight® method for tank tightness testingl We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test for purposes of verifying the results and certifying the tank system. The testing was performed in accordanCe with Tracer Tight® protocol, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 fora precision tank test. The results of testing are shown on the following certification page and indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis, condensed data sheet and a site map. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, gJ Enclosures Quinn Johnson President P.O. Box 8490" Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 ° (800) 229-2930 HORIZON ENGINEERING & TESTING P.O.. Box 8490 · Mesa, Adzona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 CERTIFICATION Contract No:13960-2490-93 Test Date:lMay 3, 1993 Customer: tTexaco R & M Attn: tFred Long 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor [Universal City ICA I91608 site: Texaco 61-058 0700 Contact: Renny Menis 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield C~_ I9-~09 Tank Tank .. Tank Test Line'Teat Leak Det. Diesel Pass Pass @ .000 Pass v~ Unleaded Pass Pass @ .000 Pass ~/- Unleaded + Pass @ .02 Pass @ .000 Pass V.~ Premium Pass Pass @ .000 Pass v/ Lines and leak detectors were tested on 6-23-93. Tank ,f3 was tested by means of AcuTest on 6-23-93. Technician Name: ! Kenneth Fine License No.: ~3-__73_8_6_ State: ICA Technician's Signature TechnicianI ~'~/~/x~: License No. Date Location J~9~/V,%9 ~'.J J ~'-'~-¢~'~ J Citkl / State HORIZON LINE TESTING DATA SHEET 1 2 3 .. 4 5 6 GARDE PUMP TYPE ISOLATOR PUMP PRESSURE · - TEST PRESSURE INITIAL LEUEL FINAL LEUEL TIME STARTED TIME COMPLETED TEST INTEflUflL LEAK RATE (GPA) MFG. D TYPE SERIAL # Test GPH ~ Test GPH___ PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL EXISTING LEAK' DETECTOR TEST q1129 ~o/9 8oz9.~ ag~ ao~ Jo~$ ~0 zP, z ,,~,~Y Pas~' Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pads'Fail Pass Fail I-I 0O 0 0 0 O I-IO 0 Oil NEW LEAK DETECTOR TEST Pass Fail P'~'s's Fail Pass Fail Past Fail Pass Fail 'Pi~ss' Fail O lEI CIO MFG. D TYPE SERIAL # AFTER TESTING Dispenser 0 FI 0 0 0 0 FI C~ 0 O Operalional Yes No J I verify that the dispenser is) work normally and that the leak detector is) are not leaking. MGA Signature .... Fie,d Notes ~ .i , .i : · 1'~'="-I ..... ' .... . i ' : ': .... i' ..F~..:i::.- .... .... ':'-'ri ....... : ~ '~ ..... ~ ....... i -- ':' ;-.:::;,;:.~.~::;.:.:;;;~|:':...:;..,~:::~--: .-. :':.:; ;'. ;-. · :-: :. ;';.,~';.~.t .: .-":it: '"t'";. ,~,,~f.,~ ....... ~,~,-~. ....... ..~,!..,, ...... . ....... ...: ....................... ...., .~ .-. . . :3?-'::-.]'..l~*-:"~"-'r'"C"i'-: ' i · ' ; . , '-: '~iI I " i - ,-~": ....... Z-O':! ....... i .... ~.:'! ' ~'-"*"~'1 ...... i'''~ ..... :' ' '"" :" ::: ::' I .J* I ' ~'~ ....... ~/.;.,z. .......... i :' ?~:ff,'r[~ri:,.:.;. :L., ,;:.:.:i,. :. ;.;., .!,.: :.; ;.; ................. .: ..... ~ ...... .:;'J ! i ,,..~..i.~.,~. f , ~.~.f :..~:~ f: f , !.. i, ,-..,, ,,: ! .... : ....... . ....... ........ .'~ ....... ! ........... [ !ii i, ii ~ii.'!'L! ........ :'~ ...... ~ .......... ~i:~'d..i ~':':::J:':.~?i'i~;['):'; , .. [..!::.. ' . ...... i i i 2::2')23J ?'.[ '-'~I'~ 7 P' ,~7~ z ~u~ ~le ~po~Uon D~te ~Ued: Siz.e Product ~tiZO lnchesG~llon ~ ~ i ~:,~,~,:..I ~- . ~l~l ~.. I I ~ I ~, *~,*.. -**.~ee, el ~ I/ le~ i.~*. I I ..I I , I Iir~ Leak .electors Deh,g Tested~ (Circl~ 0ne)Ye~ No Fluctuating U ' Low Aft'erOroughl . . ~'~. . Date ~,~-q~ Name ~'~*~'P Licens~ No Sile Name '~.~-~-~ /~.+~4' Address ~'t:.?~ ~,~ ~ Contact Citu State Zip BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILI'TYT~mya=~' ~,,~ ~i-o:g°7oo , .,: .- . ~:.:, .:~': ' ,:.:}:' . NUMBER OF..',TANKS TO BE TESTED __.,IS,PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED'Vz~ TANKS · ,-~ ~ . . :: .,-,: , - VOLUME , ~!~.. CONTENTS ..,' APPROVED BY: DATE ;.. NATU CANT ' 1 I 1 1 1 ! PREPARED FOR: Horizon Engineering 936 East Savelina Suite 1 Mesa, Arizona 85214 SUBM1TI~D BY: ER REgEARCH C'ORP(~"f'ION Tra¢ .~esearch I~orpora~ion Tracer Tight® Test of 4 Underground Storage Tanks at the Texaco g61-058 -0700 3698 Ming Road Bakersfield, CA May 3, 1993 JOB # 010389e 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tra~lOReaoarch Corporation IN2~ODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................. 2 LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 2 CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX A - ResUlts of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation ........................................................................... 4 APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA ................................................................................................ 5 APPENDIX C - FIGURES ............................................................................................................. ~ ....... .6 l 1 1 ] i .I I Tra ~cOqesaarch Corporation i I~TROD_I~CT_I O_.N_ Horizon Engineering and Tracer Research Corporation pedormed Tracer Tight® leak testing of 4 underground storage tanks at the Texaco #61-058-0700 site in Bakersfield, CA. The tanks were inoculated with tracer on April 6, 1993. Samples were collected on April 23, 1993 with sample vacuums of 2 inches Hg. The following table shows the tank size, type of tracer in each tank, and the product through put factor in the fn'st 72 hours after inoculation. TANK ~_ SIZE(GAL) TRACER FACTOR Tank 1 10,000 D 1 Tank 2 10,000 C Tank 3 10,000 F 1 Tank 4 10,000 D I The following table shows the type of product in the tank, the product level and the water level in each tank measured in inches at time of inoculation and sampling. AT INOCULATION AT SAMPLING TANK _g PRODUCT ' H2_Q PRODUCT ]:I2_Q PRODUCT Tank 1 Diesel 0.00 30.50 0.00 12.00 Tank 2 Unleaded 0.00 40.00 0.00 51.00 Tank 3 Unl. Plus 0.00 30.00 0.00 24.00 Tank 4 _ Premium 0.00 34.00 0.00 31.00 The depth to water in the tank pit was determined to be >12 feet below grade. The groundwater conditions were stable. -1- I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I Tra ~c~tesearch Corporation C. ONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Thc tracer leak detection method relics upon thc addition of a highly volatile liquid chemical to the product in the tank. If a leak occurs in the underground storage system, product is released into thc surrounding soil. Thc tracer escapes from thc product by vaporization and disperses into thc soil by molecular diffusion. Various means arc used to sample thc soil vapors in the immediate vicinity of the underground storage tanks and associated piping. Each probe has an effective detection radius of approximately 10 feet. This means that a given probe should detect a leak anywhere within.the area described by thc 10 foot radius around the probe. The tracer must be placed in thc tank at least two weeks prior to the probe sampling for this method to be effective. This process of leak detection by placing a liquid or gas tracer in a liquid product followed by detection of thc tracer underground in the vapor phase is protected under TRACER patents. Pipelines arc located using radio frequency induction and/or connection equipment The throughput factor is used to determine the amount of tracer chemical used to inoculate a given tank. The throughput factor is a multiplier and is based on thc number of tank refills expected within the first three days after inoculation. Tracer is added to the tank in an amount that will insure adequate tracer concentration after receiving all product deliveries scheduled for the first three days after inoculation. LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA The classification of leakage is based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAIL Criteria: Criteria: lqO tracer detected tracer detected If requested, total volatile hydrocarbon (TVHC) concentrations are measured to give additional information about site conditions. The TVHC data provide information about the severity of the leakage, and the degree of any possible environmental damage that may have occurred. The TVHC data is not used as a criterion factor to determine the status of a particular tank(s) or piping and is provided as supplemental information only. -2- CERTIFICATION Location: Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road Bakersfield, CA Trac~qesea,rch Corporation Job Number: 010389ell_ ULl] Date: 05/03/93 TANK # · PRODUCT SIZECgal) ' TRACER LEAK STATUS Tank I Diesel 10,000 D Pass Tank 2 Unleaded 10,000 C. Pass Tank 3 Unl. Plus 10,000 F Fail Tank 4 Premium 10,000 D Pass Tracer Research. Corporation certifies that the tanks listed in the above table have been tested by means of Tracer Tight®, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision leak test. According to EPA standard test procedures for evaluating leak detection methods, the Tracer Tight® method is capable of detecting leaks of 0.05 gallons per hour with a Probability of Detection (PD) of 0.97 ~nd Probability of False Alarm (P~:A) of 0.029. ~~rL.~ ~.~// Submitted by: . . Ca~ol'yn Norby ! Tracer Research Corporation Testers State License Number: 93-1386 The following criteria are used for the classification of leakage based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAlL Criteria: Criteria: No tracer detected tracer detected -3- I 0 Trac~Research Corporation APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation -4- Tra~r Reaearch Corporation Results of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation NonvolUmetric Tank Tightness Testing Method This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method described below complies wi~._.the per[.ormance require.merits of tlie federal undergrou~_d storage tank reg~xlation. 'l'.l~e evtauation was conducted by the equipment manulacturer or a consultant to the manufacturer according to the U.S. EP3~'s "Standard Test'Procedure for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: N-onvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Methods." The full evaluation report also includes a form describing the method and a f6rm summarizing the test data. Tank owners using this leak detection system should keep this form on file toprove compliance with tile federal regulations. Tank owners should check with State and-local agencies to make sure this form satisfies their requirements. Method Description Name: Vendor: Tracer R~search. Corporation Tracer Research Corboration 3855 North B.~incss-C.0nter Drive ~i,r,t~t add~) on Arizona , 85705 (city) (~te) (zi~) (p602) 888-9400 bani) Evaluation Results ] ! Thl.q method, which declares a tank to be le .aJ~n.' g when a threshold amount of Tracer ~;hemical is detected as a vapor in the soil outside the...tapk has an estimated probabili.ty of false alarms [P(FA)] o.f 2.9% based on .tim test results of ..1 false alarms out of _.3.! tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(FA) m from 0 to ~ %. The correspon.ding probab'.flity of detection [P(D)] of _a 0.005 gallon per hour leak i.s 97,1 % based on the test results of 33 detections' out at- ~4 stmulated leak tests. A '95'% confidence interval for P(D) is from 91.5 to 1.00%. Does thin method use additio~nl modes of leak detection? [ ] Yes [X] No If Yes, complete additional evaluation results on page 3 of this iorm. Based on the results above, and on page 3 ff applicable, this method IX] does [] does not meet the federal performance standards establi'shed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.10 gallon per hour at P(D) of 95% and P(FA) of 5%). Test Conditions During Evaluation The evaluation testing was conducted in a varvin~ size gallon IX] steel IX] fiberglass tank that was inches in diameter and ' ini:hes long, installed in backfill. The groundrwater level was varying inches above the bottom of the tank. N~.., '~ ' ieTrl'Metl~ - Bem~Fmm lsa~ 1 or3 ! Nonvolumetric TIT Method Version Tracer Tight (TM) Tre~ Research Corporation Test Conditions During Evaluation (continued) The tests were conducted with the tank v ' .drying percent full. The te _mperamre difference.between 0roduct added'to.fill.~the-.tank'and product already in the. tank ranged from N/A °F to N'/A °F, with a standard deviation of N/A °F. The product used in the evaluation was va _~ing gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and heating oil. This method m_ay be affected by other sources of interference. List these interferences below and give the ranges of conditions under which the evaluation Was done. (Check None · if.not applicable.) [ ] None Interferences Range of Test Conditions l ! Limitations on the Results * The pe, fformance has not' been substantially changed. * The vendor's instructions for using the method are followed. = The tank contaln~ a product identified on the method description form. ** The tank capadty is . gallons or smaller. The difference between added and in-t__ank product temperatures is no greater than + or - degrees Fahrenheit. [] Check if applicable: Temperature is not a fact. or because Tracer del[e .ction'outside of tank does not depend' on ffiel temperature inside tank. Temperature 0ocs not affect the amount of Tracer released. * The waiting time between the end of filling the test tank and the start of the' test data collection i~ at least hours. * .The waiting time between th.e end of "topping off" to final testing level and the start of the test data collection is at least <x hours. * The total data collection time for the test is at least hours. ** The product volume in the tank during testing is 0-100 % full. This method [ ] can [ ] cannot be used if the ground-water level is above the bottom of the tank. Other limitations specified by the vendor or determined during testing: 1, After Tracer-chemical is added, you must wait' at least 14' days to collect samples from ,v. apor probes, 2, Alternative apo?oaches must be used if too of tank is under water. 'l'liese aPproaches are available th'rough Tracer Research Con__'. NOlll~ I-Il Mdmd - itnlts Fn Tra~Research Corporation Nonvolumetric TIT Method Tracer Tight (TM). Version > Safety Disclaimer:.. This test procedure only addresses the issue of the method's ability to detect leaks. It does not test the equipment for safety hazards. Additional Evaluation ResUlts (if applicable) '1 I This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when h. as an estimated probability of fa)se alarms I_P(FA)] of .% based on the test results of ~ false alarms out or. _ tests. Note: ;A perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is fi.om 0 to %. The correspon.ding probability o.f detection [P(D.)] of a ' gallon per hour leak is .% based on t, he test results ot Oetections out of' - simulated leak tests. Note: A perfect score during testing does not mean that. the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(D)/z from 0 to .%. > Water detection mode (if applicable) Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum water level that the water sensor can detect wire a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. ysing a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum change-in water level that the water sensor can etect with. a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. Based on the minimum water level and change in water level that the water sensor can detect with a false .alarm rate of 5% and a 95%probabili~ of de. tection, the minimum time -for .the system to Oetect an increase in water le.vel at an incursion rate of 0.10 gallon per hour is N/A minutes in a N/A - gallon tanlc. Certification of Results I ceftin, that the nonvolumetric tank tightness tes.t~_ g method was installed and operated accor..O]ng to the vendor's instruction, lals9 certify that .the evaluatipn .was performed accordi:n_ ~l to the standard EPA test procedure to nonvolumetric tank tightness testing methods and that the results presentedabove are those obtained during the evaluation. H, Kendall Wilcox (printed name) Oipatu~) Ken Wilcox Associates (organization Performing evaluation) Blue Sorings. Missouri 64015 (cit~, state, ~) October 4, 1990 (date) N~ TI'/' ~ - irfsdts F~m~ (816) 229-0860 (phone number) 1~3d3 .) l l APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA -5- Research Corporation i ] ] ! Horizon/Texaco No. 61-058-0700 3698 Hing Road, Bakersfield, CA 010389e Tracer Research Corporation 4/29/93 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound 001-9 C 001-9 D 001-9 F 001-9 TVHC Page 1 Concentration 0..0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 OO2-9 C 0O2-9 D 0O2-9 F 0O2-9 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003-9 C 003-9 D 003-9 F 003-9 TVHC '0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004-9 C 004-9 D 004-9 F 004-9 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 .0001 0.0000 005-9 C 005-9 D 005-9 F 005-9 TVHC 0.0000 0o0000 0.0000 0.0000 006-9 C 006-9 D 006-9 F 006-9 TVHC 0.0000 0o0000 0.0000 0,0000 007-9 C 007-9 D 007-9 F 007-9 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) Horizon/Texaco~o 61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road, Bakersfie)d, CA 010389e Trace~r Research Corporation 4/29/93 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound BLANK01 C BLANK01 D BLANK01 F BLANK01 TVHC Page 2 Concentration 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No samp}e TVHC (0.05) i 1 ! 'l ) Tracer Research Corporation APPENDIX C - FIGURES -6- ENGINEERING & TESTING A Subsidiary of Arizona Instrument Corporation Fred Long Texaco R & M 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor Universal CitY, CA 91608 Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco 61-058 0700 3698 Ming Road/Real , Bakersfield RECEIVED JUL 2 7 1995 HAZ. MAT. DIV. CA July 12, 1993 'Dear Fred, Precision· tests were performed on. underground storage tanks at the above location· · using the Tracer Tight® method for tank tightness testing. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this. test for purposes of verifying the results and certifying the tank sYstem. The testing was performed in accordance with·Tracer Tight® protocol, which meets the Criteria set forth in NFPA 329 fora precision tank test. . 'The results of testing are shown on the following certification page and indicate whether the tank and associated piping 'passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis, condensed data sheet and a site map. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, gJ EnclOsures Quinn Johnson President P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 HORIZON ENGINEERING & TESTING P.O.. Box 8490 · Mesa, Adzona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 CERTIFICATION Contract No:13960-2490-93 Test Date:lMay 3, 1993 Customer: [Texaco R & M Attn: [Fred Long 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Roor iUniversal City ICA 191608 Site: ~ 61-058 0700 Contact: IRenny M-~ 3698 Ming Road/Real Bakersfield ICA 193309 Tank Tank. Tank Test Line'Test Leak Det. I Diesel Pass Pass @ .000 Pass -~ 2 Unleaded Pass .Pass @ .000 Pass ~/ 3 Unleaded + Pass @ .02 Pass @ .000 Pass ,/~ 4 Premium Pass Pass @ .000 Pass Lines and leak detectors were tested on 6-23-93. Tank ~3 was tested by means of AcuTest on 6-23-93. Technician Name: lKenneth Fine License No.: 193-1386 State: ICA Technician's Signature r --~-~---1 , aob No. TechnicianJ X~/¥~g J License No. Customer ~o~ ~'/- 0.~o~ 07'00 J Location J ,,..~(o9,~ /~/.,,J,? ~--o/'. J HORIZON LINE TESTING DRTR SHEET I 2 3 4 5 6 GRADE PUMP TYPE ISOLATOR PUMP PRESSURE iEST PRESSU.E INITIAL LEUEL FINAL LEUEL TIME STARTED TIME COMPLETED TEST INTERUflL LEAK RATE (GPA) MFG. D TYPE SERIAL # Test GPH ~ Test GPIt___ PAS~i FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL EXISTING LEAK DETECTOR TEST Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail pass Fail Pass Fall 0 0 0 0 0 0 FI'E] 0 E] F~ 0 NEW LEAK DETECTOR TEST Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail 'Pass Fail PaSS Fall Pass Fall 0 E] E] 0 0 0 O 0 DE] MFG. D TYPE SERIAL # Pump D Dispenser Operalional AFTER TESTING I uerlly that the dispenser (si work normally and that the leak detector (si are not leaking. MGR Signature Field Notes ,,X~4.~,.~'-~?(~) '~-~-¢_-~_f~o.x)/Q_ /, ~ ~~4. ,. ~,/~,o/~~ ~,~- ,¢~ v ¢~, ~-/~ "::-:"'-: !~?~::.::~ ¥-:' ?':'-'"'-~-:-~:-.:'~ ?:'~, · {'~-:' i"::-,:-' :-:¥:'.:' i:~'?.: ?'.'f'::t':':::;~:~:;:~-.":.:'-:'~?~ ?.:~:": ':i." ..'~I1~: ::: ........... 1 ................... ] ........ F .... r ....... r ...... , ........ r ................ 'F ..... t ....... " ...... I ! ....... : ....... I :" ' ......... ' ............ ~ ..... i-- ; - . -', .... ~ ............ .I. .................... : · .............................. i ....... t ..... ~ ..... : ..... ; .......... J .... ! ...... '!, '-i .......................... i ...... ~ ........... ', ......... ~ ..... ~ ........ I ....... ., ...... ~ ...... : i ....... '.- 1 - ~ I -f, ''J ....................................... J ....... ' ...... ; .... : .................. J ......... !':"'~'i ............ : ............ '-:----i.~: .... ~.--: .... ; ........ i ..... ~ ..... ~ I ...... "~=~'----~i .............. : .... · .... t 1~ 4 ~ : 4, .'~J ................. ..................... ~'-'".Z ............... , ................ : ..... F:' ....! ......... ~';'- -'.. ...... ; : ' · ..... r': ............ r-'~ ..... ! ...... : ...... i .......... i ....... , .... ! L ~ 'l ..... J.--":'x .......... 'J'"":'"i .......... l ......... i ............. i ..... : ........ j'-'-'. ............ "i ......... '1',~'"'" '; ........ : ' ' '; I / r ! : ~ ': j j - :--':'"'" ......... ;::::.:'~:--':: .:,:: :,:,.:,:,::-,:-:..:..:..~.,:.: ?I:'?.:"-:'¥:::':~?..:~.-'~-~.:::':~:'.:::B:';:;;:'~!4:~:s::;:: :':' :'::!:'- ;':::: ::; :; ':: ': i: i'; ': ;.:: :' :::' : ,',,-..--,--~,-.,- · .--...-...,-.'.' --,', '-. .... '-i--"..'-',,-',t. ........... ~:_ , I..: ,..._~ . ..... ,I._Z .... ~:~.. I '--~ ...... i-.':- :' ~ ! .... I ........ ! .............. ~ ....T':~ :"~1 ..... 1 ~---=-,~ ...... ~. ......... ~- . . ~ ,. ..... .........- I' ...... r ..... ' 1 ............. r;??=i' ..... $--',-:-'f J, .... ~'I----~"! ...... '' ' :' 'i .... -=~'- '"' ~ · . ',l . .. · · .. i 1 ......... ! .......... f.' ...... '""1 ......... ' ...... '":~' ...... · ' J '~ I ' ! ~.T:----]--=-! ...... i ..... . ~ ~ ' -i' --'-r--i, ..... JJ"'" : i ...... j .. · 7J "J .... :' ' : .... : ' 'i' ! i ..... I ......... !" " , . -j ]. ........ t ..... -i ........ J ......- ~ .... - :~-- !" I i ...... .. ! .---..:.-,. ..... ! .... ,, ...... , ..... :',-,.r.-:-¥,' ........ ; ................~ ........ .., ,.; ,~..~,,: ;ti'.. ~ ~-- 'i ......... . ! ' i .... .......,~ ..... :...~ ... , . ...... ,. ~i,_.s,..,C,,,.,,~4,, ,'.'' ':'.,. : . .. ! ......... .F:": ..... 'i I ;:,,i ..... .;- ".:';-- ' - i ' ;.,,;-;-;!..;.i-; .: .... ; ........... : ...... i .... _,: ...... t _:- ....... ~'~-.-.- ....... : .. ; .... f -.: '. ....... l.....i; .......... I ...... ~ ............. i .....i. ----~:-- -i ........ i ...... ' .... t .--;':~-:~-~I .... i i . -... . ~ .... .... :~I; :.:::"~.~:.:',::;" ! !i 'i: i'::'i '~ ~'~' :" ': i:'i: '"~' ,: ':i:~ ~'~":~ .::; ':: · .. h. .'. : ~ - :~ ; ,;,]' · ......I ~ ', ,.,., .,., ?' I i .. ,~.! i. ~ .! .!.;. ~'.'_: .... i~ . _.]... .... i... :.. ' · I T'RA¢~ ~,.~-q~.R~'~ ¢ORPOAAT~O~'. ~E~56 N. Buxin~m~ ¢~mtm' Dr., Tucson, A~ 85705 ~ (80~) 888-11400 ~.. ~:~-~., CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ~,., ,.,,, / .~,~ ,/~~~~~ LAB --- - Return vttl~ i&mpJcs to lab . ORA.~GI~ - Sender'o copy Tech. Date ~~(~ -~ Name 'F~'/~c"t'ft'/c License Cilu St~le Zip field Notes ,,,~4 ~(" ~- lire Leak Detectors Presenl? (Circle One) Yes Stable r--J _ -tligh Afterlteauu A=in Fluctuating U ~ Low After Drought Tidal influence~ U ' BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326.,3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST ~ER OF.:T~KS TO B.E TESTED' ~" ".:~ PipING:GoING TO BE TESTED .'. .... :-': ' CONTENTS ~PROVED BY: DAT~ '~:.. ::. . NATU C~T PREPARED FOR: Horizon Engineering 936 East ]avelina Suite 1 Mesa, Arizona 85214 SUBMYITED BY: TRACER RESEARCH CORP~/A~ION Tral Research Corporetion Tracer Tight® Test of 4 Underground Storage Tanks at the Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road Bakersfield, CA May 3, 1993 JOB # 010389e TABLE OF CONTENTS ! 1 ! l INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................. 2 LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 2 CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX A - ResUlts of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation ....... i ................................................................... 4 APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA ................................................................................................ 5 APPENDIX C - FIGURES ................................................. ' ................................... : ................................ .6 1 i N'I'RO__I)~UC'I'I~N_ ltorizoq Engineering and Tracer Research Corporation performed Tracer Tight® leak testing of 4 underground.storage tanks.at the Texaco #61-058-0700 site in Bakersfield, CA. The tanks were inoculated with tracer on April 6, 1993. Samples were collected on April 23, 1993 with sample vacuums of 2 inches Hg. The following table shows the tank size, type of tracer in each tank, and the product through put factor in the first 72 hours after inoculation. TracOFlesearch Corporation TANK _g SIZE(GAL) TRACER FACTOR ~Tank I 10,000 D 1 Tank2 '10,000 C I Tank 3 10,000 F 1 Tank 4 I0,000 D I The following table shows the type of product in the tank, the product level and the water level in each tank measured in inches at time of inoculation and sampling. AT INOCULATION A._~_T SAMPLING TANK g_ PRODUCT ~ PRODUCT ~ PRODUCT Tank 1 Diesel 0.00 30.50 0.00 12.00 Tank 2 Unleaded 0.00 40.00 0.00 51.00 Tank 3 Unl. Plus 0.00 30.00 0.00 24.00' Tank 4 Premium 0.00 34.00 0.00 31.00 The depth to water in the tank pit was determined to be >i2 feet below grade~ The groundwater conditions were stable. -l- I 1 1 ! I Tra~Reaearch Corporation CONCElrl' OF OI'ERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION · The tracer leak detection method relics upon the addition of a highly volatile liquid chemical to the product in the tank. If a leak occurs in the underground storage system, product is released into the surrounding soil. The tracer e.~apes from the product by vaporization and disperses into the soil by molecular diffusion. Various means are used to sample the soil vapors in the immediate vicinity of the underground storage tanks and associated piping. Each probe has an effective detection radius of approximately 10 feet. This means that a given probe should detect a leak anywhere within the area described by the 10 foot radius around the probe. The tracer must be placed in the tank at least two weeks prior to the probe sampling for this method to be effective. This process of leak detection by placing a liquid or gas tracer in a liquid product followed by detection of the tracer underground in the vapor phase is protected under TRACER patents. Pipelines are located using radio frequency induction and/or connection equipment. The throughput factor is used to determine the amount of tracer chemical used to inoculate a given tank. The throughput factor is a multiplier and is based on the number of tank refills expected within the fi?st three days after inoculation. Tracer is added to the tank in an amount that will insure adequate tracer concentration after receiving all product deliveries scheduled for the first three days after inoculation. LEAK I)EI'E(~TION CRITERIA The classification of leakage is based on thc presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAIL Criteria: Criteria: NO tracer detected tracer detected If requested, total volatile hydrocarbon (TVHC) concentrations are measured to give additional information about site conditions. Thc TVHC data provide information about the severity of thc leakage, and the degree of any possible environmental damage that may have occurred. The TVHC data is not used as a criterion factor to determine the status of a particular tank(s) or piping and is provided as supplemental information only. -2- I ] CERTIFICATION Location: Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road Bakersfield, CA Tra~ Research Corporation Date: 05/03/93 TANK # PRODUCT SIZECgal) TRACER LEAK STATUS Tank 1 Diesel 10,000 D Pass Tank 2 Unleaded 10,000 C Pass Tank 3 Unl. Plus 10,000 F Fail Tank 4 Premium 10,000 D Pass Tracer Research Corporation certifies that the tanks listed in the above table have been tested by means of Tracer Tight®, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision leak test. According to EPA standard test procedures for evaluating leak detection methods, the Tracer Tight® method is capable of detecting leaks of 0.05 gallons per hour with a Probability of DetectiOn (PD) of 0.97 ired Probability of False Alarm Submitted by: ......... ~ -- Carolyn Norby / Tracer Research Corporation ~// Testers State License Number: 93-1386 The following criteria are used for the classification of leakage based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAlL Criteria: Criteria: No tracer detected tracer detected -3- Tra~ Reeearch Corporation APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation -4- TrJr Reeearch Corporation Results of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation NonvolUmetric Tank Tightness Testing Method This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method described below complies with__the performance require.merits of tile federal tmdergrou~.d storage tank reg~tlafion. 'l:l~e evaluation was conducted by the e_qm'pment manufacturer or a consultant to the manufacturer according to the U.S. EPA's "Standard Test'Pwcedure for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: N-onvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Methods." The ~11 evalu.ation report also includes a form describing the method and a £6rm summarizing the test aata. Tank owners using this leak detection system should keep this form on file toprove compliance with the federal regulations. Tank owners should check with State and-local age6cies to make sure this form satisfies their requirements. Method Description Nalne'. Vendor: Tracer Re, search Comoration Tracer Research Corboration . 3855..North B~sincss-C~nter Drive . ,~7~;t address) on Arizona 85705 (city) [602) 888-9400 Evaluation Results J l .1 ] This .me, thod, which declares a tank to be le .a~n.' g when a threshold amount of Tracer chermcal is detected as a vapor in ,he soil ou. tsia, the ~ has an estimated probability of false alarmq [P(FA)] of 2.9% based on me test results of 1 false alarms out of 34 tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from 0 to 8.5 %. The correspon.ding probab'.flity of detection [P(D)] of .a 0.005 gallon per hour leak ¢ 97.1 % based on the test results of 33 detections' out or-. 34 sfinulated leak tests. A ~ confidence interval for P(D) is from 91,5 to 100 %. Does this method use additional modes of leak detection? [ ] Yes IX] No If Yes, complete additional evaluation results on page 3 of thi.q torm. Based on the results above, and on page 3 if applicable, this method IX] does [] does not meet the federal performance standa/ds established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.10 gallon per hour at P(D) of 95% and P(FA) of 5%). 1 Test Conditions During Evaluation The evaluation testing was conducted in a varvin:, size gallon IX] steel [x] fiberglass tank that was inches in diameter and ' inches long, installed in backfill. The ground-water level was varying inches above the bottom of the tank. N~m~nat~ ~ M~ - ittnu~ F~sn Pa~ 1 ~d3 1 1 -] Nonvolumetric TIT Method Version Tracer Tight (TM) TraJResearch Corporation ! Test Conditions During Evaluation (continued) The tests were conducted with the tank varying percent full. The temperature difference.between l~roduct added'to-ffi/-the-.tank and product already in the tank ranged from N/A °F to N'/A °F, with a standard deviation of N/A °F. The product used in the evaluation was va _rying gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and heating oil. This method re_ay be affected by other sources of interference. List these interferences below and give tlie ranges of con~litions under which the evaluation was done. (Check None if not apph~cable.) [ ] None Interferences Range of Test Conditions l ] .1 J I Limitations on the Results * The performance has not been substantially changed. * The vendor's in.~tructions for using the method are followed. * The tank contains a product identified on the method description form. ** The tank capacity is gallons or smaller. The difference between ailded and in-tank product temperatures is no greater than + or - degrees Fahrenheit. [] Check if applicable: Temperature is not a fact. or because Tracer' detection'outside of tank does not deoend on ffiel temperature inside tank. Temperature does not affect the amount of T?acer released. * The waiting time between the end of filling the test tank and the start of the' test data collection ~s at least hours. * .The waiting time between th.e end of "topping off' to final testing level and the start of the test data collection is at least <x hours. * The total data collection time for the test is at least hours. ** The product volume in the tank during testing is 0-100 % full. This method [ ] can [ ] cannot be used if the ground-water level is above the bottom of the tank. Other limitations specified by the vendor or determined during testing: 1, After Tracer'chemical is added, you must wait' at' least 14' days to collect samples from y. apor probes, 2, Alternative approaches ml~t be used if toy of tank is under water, lliese approaches are available flirough Tracer Research C0rl$, No~e~ TYI' Me~ed - ~ Form I / 1 Tra0 Reseerch Corporation Nonvoh~metric TIT Method Tracer Tight (TM) Version > Safety Disclaimer:. This test proc. edure .only addresses the issue of the method's ability to detect 'leaks. It does not test the eqmpment for safety hazards. Additional Evaluation ResUlts (if applicable) This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when .......... . ..... h. as an estimated probability of xai. se rearms it'[vA)] ot .% based on ~e test results o.f -- fal/e alarms out ot tests. Note: 3, perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from 0 to . %. The corresponding probability qf detection ~(D)] ora gallon per hour leak is % based on t~e test results of deiections out of' simulated leak tests. Note: A perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(D) is from 0 to .%. > Water detection mode (if applicable) Us'mE a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum water level that the water sensor can detect with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. dUsing a false alarm rate of 5%, the mirdmum change in water level that the water sensor can etect with. a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. Based on the minimum water level and change in water level that the water sensor can detect with a false .alarm rat? of 5% and a 95~probabilit~ of detection, the minimum time -for .the syg'_ tern to ~letect an mc'rome in water level at an mcursion rate of 0.10 gallon per hour is N/A minutes in a. N/A - gallon tank. Certification of Results l certi~, that the nonvol, metric tank tightness tes _t~_ g method was installed and op_erated accor.d[n.' g to ~e vendor's instruction.-I als.o cerfif~ that _the evaluati.on .was performed according to the standard EPA test procedure to nonvolumetric tank tightness testing methods and that the results presentedabove are those obtained during the evaluation. H,,,Kendall Wilcox (lafint~ name) (signaturO October 4, 1990 (date) Ken Wilcox Associates . (organization l~rgon=hg ,--valuation) Blue Sp '.nn. gs, Missouri 64015 (d~y, state, z~) (816) ?~9~- r0)860 (phone APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA Tretr Reeearch Corporation -5- :' i ' Tr'c~er Research Corporation Horizon/Texaco No. 61-058-0700 ~ 3698 Fling Road, Bakersfield, CA 010389e -] 1 l 4/29/93 Location CONDENSED DATA Compound Page I Concentration 001-9 C 0.0000 001-9 D 0.0000 001-9 F 0.0000 001-9 TVHC 0.0000 002-9 C 0.0000 002-9 D 0.0000 002-9 F 0.0000 002-9 TVHC 0.0000 003-9 C '0.0000 003-9 D 0.0000 003-9 F 0.0000 003-9 TVHC 0.0000 004-9 C 0.0000 004-9 D 0.0000 004-9 F .0001 004-9 TVHC 0.0000 0O5-9 C 0.0000 005-9 D 0.0000 005-9 F 0.0000 005-9 TVHC 0.0000 006-9 C 0.0000 006-9 D 0.0000 006-9 F 0.0000 006-9 TVHC 0.0000 007-9 C 0.0000 007-9 D 0.0000 007-9 F 0.0000 007-9 TVHC 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 : Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 : No sample TVHC (0.05) 1- 1 1 ] 1 I 1 Horizon/Texaco~o 61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road, Bakersfield, CA 010389e 4/29/93 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound BLANK01 C BLANK01 D BLANK01 F BLANK01 TVHC · ra~Re~oarch Corporation Page 2 Concentration 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 : Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 : No sample TVHC (0.05) -] ] ] I ! Tracer Research Corporation APPENDIX C - FIGURES -6- EXPLANATION · 1 Sampling Probe Location .... ~-- Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING 010389e 0 5 10 f · e t $ ~lank TEXACO #81-05'8-0700 3698 MING ROAD BAKERS FIELD, CALIF0 RNI, { SAMPLIN 0 LOCATION S [ Figure I G __- Tank 1 O 1' O 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer OF[II .9 '8 Tank 0 0 10,000 ga] Unleadedi Tracer Ici O Fln 11. 10' Tank 3 0 0 10,000 gal Plus Tracer O Fil] Tank 4 0 0 10,000 gal Premium Tracer 0~11 .7 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY-;-m~o ~]~ ~f~5~ o70o PERMIT TO OPERATE % OPERATORS NAME ~i~ ~l-~ 07~o NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED ~ OWNERS NAME ~ ~ ~ ~ IS PIPING GOING TO' BE TESTED. TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS ~ /~.ooo ~~- .3 /o., p~ 0 ~,u~.~ TANK TESTING COMPANY ~f~zo~3 TEST METHOD....7-f~ L~ 7Qf., ~- NAME OF TESTER ~/~ ~,~1 ADDRESS '-~© ~.'~ CERTIFICATION STATE REGISTRATION DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED ....... DATE S I-GNATURE~ '~OF~ APPLICANT ' ENGINEERING & TESTING November 30, 1992 Fred Long Texaco R & M' - 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor Universal City , CA 91608 Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road/Real, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Fred, Precision tests were performed on' underground storage tanks at the above location using the LEAK COMPUTER® System. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test for purposes of verifying the results and certifying the tank system. The testing was performed in accordance with ACURITE® protocol, and therefore satisfies all requirements for such testing as set forth by NFPA 329-87 and USEPA 40 CFR part 280. The results of testing are shown on the following page and indicate whether the full systems, including the tank and associated piping, or just the individual tank passed or failed. Included with the report are copies of computer printouts of data compiled during the last hour of each test. Theprintout shows leak rate and the confidence level (three times standard deviation) of that leak rate. This information is stored in a permanent file if future verification of test results are needed. Sincerely, gJ Quinn Johnson President Enclosures P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 HORIZON ENGINEERING & TESTING P.O. Box 8490. Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 Contract No:12490-1175-3-92 Test Date:lNovember 13, 1992 Customer: ~Texaco R & M Attn: iFred Long 110 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor !Universal City [CA L91608 Site: ~ Site No. 61-058-0700 Contact: lManage~ 13698 Ming Road/Real [BAKERSFIELD gA_ [93309 Tank Tank Tank Test Line Test No. ~ Beau_It Result Unleaded Plus Pass @ .01 Pass @ .000 Technician Name: IRon Johnson License No.: 192-1392 State: ICA Technician's Signature TECHNICIAN DATE TIME TESTING HORIZON B CUSTOMER LOCATION LINE TESTING DATA SHEET C D E F Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail GP~ PUMP TY ISOLATOR ' PUMP PRESSURE TEST PRESSURE INITIAL LEVE FINAL LEV TIME STARTED TIME COMPLET~ TESTING INTERVAL LEAK RATE MFG.& TYPE '- F-.^l~,.3 I I 1~1~,,.3 t..F...,/-~,I~, i./F-. I r- t,.~ I Un I r-o I ...... Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail SERIAL # Test GPH Test GPM MFG.& TYPE SERIAL # NEW LEAK DETECTOR TEST Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pass Fail Pump & Dispenser Operational AFTER TESTING No Yes No Yes No Yes No FIELD NOTES I verily that the dispenser(s) work normally and tibet the leak detector(s) are not leaking. MGR Signature 77~ Texaco R&M Site #61-058-0700 Contract #2490-1175-92 November 13, 1992 LFD: ¥~EF'i-i SA(/: 36 LRA: 3E~ VO~Ei~E-( = 0. I GC~L Texaco R&M Site #61-058-0700 Contract #2490-1175-92 November 13, 1992 ;,3 ;t ( ) ; : ', .) ) ) .) ) ) ) ) ~ ','. t ~ 1 'ii'! :? Texeco R&M Site #61-058-0700 Contract #2490-1175-92 November 13, 1992 tlii 1111 tttl t 1111 Tel~tco R&M Site #61-058-0700 Contrsct #2490-1175-92 November 13, 1992 Ah~ALYSI F'; 0F LEAl<,,_.w~:t F-"T_.n. FAF'_ . i e,(:8{'i ~AI. ~ r~,..! ~f~l c~r~c~ p TANK :--::'FA¢~,, _::'F'P.C:.'~, 8 . C:t ,-j~ !.,-"hr- ,~, i nche'~ ~:'FA6,5,46P~27 8 · ;--:'i ,~a.l .,.-'"hr- 2? i riches I I I ENGINEERING & TESTING I I I I I I I I I I I '1 I I I I October 26, 1992 Fred Long Texaco Refining & Manufacturing, Inc. 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor Universal City, CA 91608 Re: Tank Tightness Tests - 3698 Ming Road/Real, Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 Bakersfield CA Dear Fred, Precision tests were performed on underground storage tanks at the above location using the Tracer Tight~ method for tank tightness testing. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test for purposes of verifying the results and.certifying the tank system. The testing was performed in accordance with Tracer Tight(~ protocol, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision tank test. The results of testing are shown on the following certification page and indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis, condensed data sheet and a site map. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Enclosures Sincerely, Ouinn Johnson President P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 ~' (800) 229-2930 I I HORIZON ENGINEERING TESTING . - . I P.O~. B~ox 849~0_ Mesa, Ari~zo~na 8~5~2!4__ (60~2) 926-300~0 _(800~) 229-293~0 I CERTIFICATION I Contract No: ~:2 Test Date:~)ct~ber 22, 1992- I I Customer: Texaco Refining & Manufacturing, Site: ~Site No. 61-058-0700 Attn: F~B~___ Contact: ~_____ 110 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor I3698 Ming Road/Real I IUniversal City ICA 191~08 ~ --~CA ~ I Tank Tank Tank Test Line Test No. Product Result Result I 1 Diesel Pas 2 b~d e~~ - Pas 3 Unleaded + Fa I 4 Premium-- Pas I I *Tested on 8-13-92. I I I ( Technician '~ , I ,. ~ | Technician s_Signatu_[re I Name: ~hlin i ~-- ~.--~ I L State:iCA '1 01 Diesel Pass* Pass* 02 Unleaded Pass* Pass* 03 Unleaded + Fail -- 04 Premium Pass* Pass* I TRACER RESF~RCH CORPORATION, 3B~5 N. BU~ne~ C~mter Dr., Tucson, AZ 85705 0., ,~.-~-~ CHAIN OF CUST09¥ RECOR9 ~X~ ~,l.~Z~ ~ Sample Dispos~tion Date ~tUed: samples rn v~,Lh se-~ples to lab pI2qK - Returo ~ith samples to lab OR~;G!e - 5enfler's cop! I I ............................ Annual Ground ThroughTracer Depth to i I I I I I size Proc]uti ......... Inoc. ~'~ H28 InchesGallon-' I,est' Ret~--~ Water PUt Amount Bottom LineTest:; C]Tracer C] Pressure [3 Vents C] N°n~"~'~ Are Leak Detectors Present? (Circle One) Yes No Are Leak Oetectors Being Tested? (Circle One) Yes No Ground W~..~er Condilions: (Check One) Stable ~ _ HiDh After Heauy RainF-II Fluctuating L.~ Low After Drought C]' Tidal Influence I--] Oate ~-/&-- ¢~' Name site Name "]~X,4~ ''~ (~i-OS'g address "~q'~ ,/~','0'~,/'gd'fl'z''' Contact Citu State Zip Field Notes . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PREPARED FOR: Horizon Engineering 936 East Javelina Suite 1 Mesa, Arizona 85214 SUBMITI~ED BY: TRACER RE'SEARCH CORP~S~TION eaaarch Corporation Tracer Tight® Test of 1 Underground Storage Tank at thc Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Real Bakersfield, CA October 22, 1992 JOB # 010389d I 0 ~.ce~s~arch Co~po~.l:ion I i TABLE OF CONTENTS I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................. 2 LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 2 CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation ........................................................................... 4 APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA ............. : .................................................................................. 5 APPENDIX C - FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 6 'rrac;e(l~e~,i.a rob Cor'por~,tion , , INTROi) UCTION Horizon Engineering and Tracer Research Corporation performed Tracer Tight® leak testing of 1 underground storage tank at the Texaco//61-058-0700 site in Bakersfield, CA. The tank was inoculated with tracer on September 15, 1992, to a concentration of approximately 10 ppm. Samples were collected on October 13, 1992. The following table shows the tank size, type of tracer in each tank, fuel through put factor in the first 72 hours after inoculation and total amount of tracer introduced into each tank: I I I I I I TANK ~_ SIZE(GAL) TRACER FACTOR AMOUNT(G) Tank 3 10,()00 G I 100 The following table shows the type of product in the tank, the product level and the water level in each tank measured in inches at time of inoculation and sampling. TANK # PRODUCT Tank 3 Unl Plus AT INOCULATION H20 PRODUCT AT SAMPLING H20 PRODUCT 0.00 31.00 0.00 21.00 The depth to water in the tank pit was determined to be >14 feet below grade. The groundwater conditions were stable. -I- I 0 Trace~esearch Corporation I CONCEI'T OF OI'ERATION AND IMI'I, EMENTATION I The tracer leak detection method relies the addition of a highly volatile liquid upon chemical to the product in the tank. 'If a leak occurs in the underground storage system, fuel is I' released into the surrounding soil. The tracer escapes from the fuel by vaporization and disperses into the soil by molecular diffusion. Various means are used to sample the soil vapors i in the ilnmediate vicinity of the underground storage tanks and associated piping. Each probe . has an effective detection radius of approximately 10 feet. This means that a given probe should detect a leak anywhere within the area described by the 10 foot radius around the probe. The I tracer must be placed in the tank at least two weeks prior to the probe sampling for this method to be effective. This process o{' leak detection by placing a liquid or gas tracer in a liquid i product I'ollowed by detection of tile tracer underground in the vapor phase is protected under TRACER patents. I The throughput factor is used to determine the amount of tracer chemical used to inoculate a given tank. The throughput factor is a multiplier and is based on the number of tank refills i expected within the first three clays after inoculation. The multiplied amount of tracer is used to maintain the concentration of tracer in the tank to at least 10 ppm over the first 3 days after inoculation based on the estimated amoUnt of fuel to be received during this period. LEAK I)ETECTION CRITERIA The classification of leakage is based on the presence or absence of tracer. '1 PASS FAIL Criteria: Criteria: I' NO tracer detected tracer detected I I I If requested, total volatile hydrocarbon (TVHC) concentrations are measured to give additional information about site conditions. The TVHC data provide information about the severity of the leakage, and the degree of any possible environmental damage that may have occurred. The TVHC data is not used as a criterion factor to determine the status of a particular tank(,s) or piping and is provided as supplemental information only. I -2- I 0 ~race~e.earch Corporation I i CERTIFICATION Job Number: 010389d Date' 10/22/92 I LocatiOn: Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Real Bakersfield, CA I TANK # I'ROI)UCri' SiZE(gal} TRACER LEAK STATUS I I I I Tank 3 Uni Plus 10,000 G Fail Tracer Research Corporation certifies that the tank listed in the above table has been tested by means of Tracer Tight®, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision leak test. According to EPA standard test procedures for evaluating leak detection methods, the Tracer Tight® method is capable of detecting leaks of 0.05 gallons per hour with a Probability of Detection (Pi')) of 0.97 and Probability of False Alarm (PI:A) Of ().1}29. Submitted by: Carolyn Norb~ Tracer Research Corporation Testers State License Number: 95-1518 I I I I I I I I The following criteria are used for the classification of leakage based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAIL Criteria: Criteria: No tracer detected tracer detected -3- I 0 Trat=e~e.earch Corpor.t;ion I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation -4- I I I I I Results of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation Nonvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Method This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method described below complies with the performance requirements of tlie federal underground storage tank regp_lation. T~.e evaluation was conducted by the equipment manufacturer or a consultant to the manufacturer according to the U.S. EPA's "Standard Test Procedure for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: N-onvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Methods." The full evaluation report also includes a form describing the method and a f6rm summarizing the test data. Tank owners using this leak detection system should keep this form on file to prove compliance with tile federal regulations. Tank owners should check with State and local agencies to make sure this form satisfies their requirements. Method Description I I Name: Vendor: Tracer Research Corporation Tracer Research Corporation 3855 North Business Center Drive (street address) Tucson Arizona 85705 (602~ 888-9400 (city) (state) (zip) (phon~) I I I I I EvalUation Results This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when a threshold amount of Tracer chemical is detected as a vapor in the soil Outside the ta.nk has an estimated probability of false alarms [P(FA)] of 2.9 %. based on.the, test results of ~1 false .alarms out of tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from _.O_0 to 8.5 %. The corresponding probability of detection [P(D)] of ~a 0.005 gallon per hour leak i.s 97.1 % based on the test results of 33 detections out ot 34 stmulated leak tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(D) is from 91,5 to 100 %. Does this method use additional modes of leak detection.'?[ ] Yes [X] No If Yes, complete additional evaluation results on page 3 of this zorm. Based on the results above, and onpage 3 if applicable, this method [X] does [] does not meet the federal performance standards estabhshed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.10 gallon per hour at P(D) of 95% and P(FA) of 5%). I I I Test Conditions During Evaluation The evaluation testing was conducted in a varvino size gallon [X] steel [X] fiberglass tank that was inches in diameter and ' inkhes long, installed in backfill. The ground-water level was varying inches above the bottom of the tank. TIT Metlmd - ii,salts Fom~ Pa~ 1 ~3 I 0 Trace~e.earoh Corporation I I I Nonvolumetric TYF Method Tracer Tight (TM) Version ' I I I I I I Test Conditions During Evaluation (continued) The tests were conducted with the tank varying percent full. The temperature difference between product added to fill the tank 'and product already in the tank ranged from N/A °F to N'/A °F, with a standard deviation of N/A °F. The product used in the evaluation was varying gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and heating oil. This method may be affected by_ other sources of interference. List these interferences below and give the ranges of conditions under which the evaluation was done. (Check None if not applicable.) [ ] None Interferences Range of Test Conditions Limitations on the Results I I I I I I I I [] i The performance has not been substantially changed. The vendor's instructions for using the method are followed. The tank contains a product identified on the method description form. The tank capacity is gallons or smaller. The difference betwe'~'ff~lded and in,tank .product. temperatures is no greater than + or - degrees Fahrenheit. Check if applicable: Temperature is not a fact. or because Tracer detection outside of tank does not depend on ftiel temperature inside tank, Temperature does no~; affect the amount of Tracer released. * The waiting time between the end of filling the test tank and the start of the test data collection i~ at least hours. * The waiting time between the end of "topping off' to final testing level and the start of the test data collection is at least <x l~ours. *The total data collection time for the test is at least hours. *The product volume in the tank during testi.ng is 0-100 .% full. * This method [ ] can [ ] cannot be used if the ground-water level is above the bottom of the tank. Other limitations specified by the vendor or determined during testing: 1. After Tracer chemical is added, you must wait at least 14 days to collect samples from ,vapor probes. 2. Alternative aPP?oaches must be used if too of tank is under water, These 'approaches are available through Tracer Research Corl~. TIT Mefl~od - ~ Fom~ I 0 Tracet~esearch Cor~l~orat:ion I I I Nonvolumetric TIT Method .Tracer Tight (TM) Version .... > Safety Disclaimer: This test procedure 9nly addresses the issue of the method's ability I to detect leaks. It does not test the eqmpment for safety hazards. Additional Evaluation Results (if applicable) I This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when__~ has an esti false alarms [P(FA)] of I of__ tests. Note: A perfect score during testing does not mean that ti Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) O-~. I The corresponding probability o.f detection [P(D)] of a . gallon per hour leak is ~% based on the test results of · detections out ot~ simulated leak tests. Note: A perfect score during tes~~ not mean that the method is Based I on the observed results, a 9.5% co~nfidence interval for P(D)is from 0 to perfect..%. > Water detection mode (ff applicable) I Using a rate 5%, mum water false alarm of thl level that the with a 95% probability of detectiot ~/A inches. I .Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the.um change in water level ti oetect with a 95% probability of de n is N/A inches. Based on the minimum water leve change in water level th~ I detect with a false alarm rate of 5°3t 95~ probability_ of detec for the system to detect an incre.as ater level at an incursion hour is N/A minutes in a N/A [on tank. I certify that the nonvolumet] ttness testing method was I accord.!ng to the vendor's in also certify that .the eva accorOing to the standard E )cedure to nonvolumetri( methods and that the results bove are those obtained I H. Kendall Wilcox Ken Wilcox Associates Lo~nted name) (organization performing evaluation) ~_ ~ Blue Springs, Missouri (sig~atu~) (city, state, zip~ I October 4, 1990 (816) 229-0860 (date) '(pho~c number) INom~i~m~r~ 111' Method - I . h. as an estimated probability of false alarms [P(FA)] of % based on the test results of ~ false alarms out of_ _ tests. Note: A perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from 0 to Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum water level that the water sensor can detect with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum change in water level that the water sensor can with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. Based on the minimum water level and change in water level that the water sensor can detect with a false alarm rate of 5% and a 95~probability of detection, the minimum time for the system to detect an increase in water level at an incursion rate of 0.10 gallon per hour is N/A minutes in a N/A - gallon tank. I cert'.fly that the nonvolumetric tank tightness testing method was installed and operated according to t.he vendor's instruction. 1 als9 certify that .the evaluatign .was performed according to the standard EPA test proceclure to nonvolumetric tarm tightness testing methods and that the results presentedabove are those obtained during the evaluation. 64015 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA -5- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Horizon/Texaco No. 61-058-0700 3698 HJng Real, Bakersfield~ CA 010389d 10/21/92 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound O02-5 G 002-5 TVHC ~mrch Corpormtion Page I Concentration 0.0000 .1620 003-5 G 003-5 TVHC 0.0000 .1910 004-5 G 004-5 TVHC .0002 6.2140 BLANK01 G BLANK01 TVHC 0.0000 .1200 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX C - FIGURES Trac! -6- eaearch Corporation 010389d EXPLANATION · l Sampling Probe Location Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING 0 5 10 I I I I f · · t B{ank TEXACO 61-058-0700 3698 MIN~ REAL BAKERSFISLD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLING LOCATIONS Figure Tank 1 © O 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer [DA] { ! Tank 2 O O 10,000 gal Unleaded Tracer O Fill .9 '6 Tank 3 O O 10,000 gal Plus Tracer 11- 10' Tank 4 O O -1 10,000 gal Premium Tracer AUGUST 21, 1992 TEXACO CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608 JOB ORDER N0.:.1107734 3698 MING AVENUE 61O587OO JOB DESCRIPTION: 1) INSPECTED FILL CAP, ADAPTER AND VAPOR CAP. ALL IN GOOD CONDITION AND TIGHT SEAL. FOUND SEAL ON 4" EVERTITE PROBE CAP NOT SEALING TIGHTLY. REPLACED. 2) 3) CHECKED TANK (U/L PLUS) FOR WATER~ NONE FOUND. U/L PLUS SUB-PUMP PIT SHOWS NO SIGNS OF LEAKAGE. TESTED PLUS PRODUCT LINE. BEGINNING LINE PRESSURE @ START OF TEST 32 PSI. PRESSURE AFTER 20 MINUTES SHOWED 30.5 PSI. LEAK DETECTOR WORKING PROPERLY. 5) FOUND SEAPAGE ON STRAINER GASKET OF PUMP #2 NORTH SIDE OF U/L PLUS. TIGHTENED AND TESTED. TIGHTED UNION ON PRODUCT LINE OF PUMP #4 U/L PLUS. CHECKED CALIBRATION ON ALL U/L PLUS METERS TEXACO JOB ORDER Name of Acct. /<?~k"/~ ~ Date, ~/z.)/_ ?<~ Job Order No. WORK AUTHORIZED BY · Date Job Completed SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY. 19 This is,4~certifY that work we, s"'~isfactorily_completed.~,,.---- .. ~" TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC; ' CONTRACTOR'S INVOICE ' :. . Description of work to be done subject to terms on reverse side nereor. ~enormance or work ~/comrac~or snml consume accep- Description of Materials Used From the Contractor's Stock (Use Attac~. tance of terms on reverse side hereof. . · ' ment if Necessary.) '-' . S Attach Vendor's Invoice Covering Material Purchased. MATE~L~U MARKUP ': TOTAL U · B c o 'R A C T '-7 · MATERIAL/RENTAL/SUB COI~'i~C~' IOIAL $ R M E 0 O 'EXCLUDING MEAL BREAKS TOTAL LABOR COST Mileage (If applicable) ,/~ Miles @ ,~)* 'Per Mile =Total Mileage TOTAL MILEAGE $ TAXABLE AMT. $ ~ ~o n~s TOTAL INVOICE I (we) certify that the above mentioned WOrk was performed by me (us) in a workmanlike manner and charges are in accordance with terms agreed upon or with the Texaco Form S-240 "Hourly Rate Contract" which may be in effect and that I (we) certify that the above mentioned work was performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The undersigned shall maintain accurate records pertaining to all work performed hereunder and all transactions related thereto and agrees to retain all such records for not less than two years after completion of the work performed hereunder. The undersigned shall not pay any commissions, fees, or grant any rebates to any employe or officer of COMPANY nor favor employes or officers of COMPANY with gifts or entertainment of significant cost or value nor enter into any business arrangements with employes or officers of COMPANY, other than as a representative of COMPANY, without COMPANY'S written approval. Any representative or representatives authorized by COMPANY may audit any and all records of CONTRACTOR relative to the work performed hereunder and all transactions related thereto for the purpose of determining whether there has been compliance with this agreement. Contractoragrees to reimburse Company promptly for any payments made hereunder for labor performed on and/or materials furnished to any~porty other than that specifically set out in this agreement. VENDOR NO. (,"~/G::~-'~I~.*P NAME (Pdnt or Type) ENGINEERING & TESTING '1 I I il I I I I I I I I I I I I August 13, 1992 Fred Long Texaco Refining & Manufacturing, Inc. 10 Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor Universal City, CA 91608 Re: Tank Tightness Tests - Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 3698 Ming Road/Real, Bakersfield , CA Dear Fred, Precision tests were performed on underground storage tanks at the above location using the Tracer Tight® method for tank tightness testing. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test for purposes of verifying the results and certifying the tank system. The testing was performed in accordance with Tracer Tight~ protocol, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision tank test. The results of testing are shown on the following certification page and indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis, condensed data sheet and a site map. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Enclosures Sincerely, Ouin~n President P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 I I I HORIZON ENGINEERING & TESTING P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 I I I I I I CERTIFICATION Contract No: i2490-1175-92 Test Date:iAugust 13, 1992 Customer: [Texaco Refining & Manufacturing, Attn: !Fred Long ' ~[~0_n Universal City Plaza, 4th Floor Site: jTexaco Site No. 61-058-0700 Contact: M~M~ger  Ming Road/Real rsfield Tank Tank Tank Test Line Test I I I I I I I I NO, Product Result Result Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail -- Pass Pass Diesel Unleaded Unleaded Premium Technician Name: lMike Sahlin License No.: 1.95-1518 State: ICA Technician's Signature TRACER RESEiRClt CORPORkTION. 3865 N. BuMnese C~ter Dr.. Tucson. ~Z 85705 ... ~-~- CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD (eo~) eee-e4oo each ehlppi~8~ order Probe ~ Depth ' ~ Date Time 4; . . Remarka 1003 Phone: LAB Rem~-k~ [~lnal sampl~ Dl.posttion Date BlUed: 1FHITE - Return with samples to lab. Y~LLO1F -- Return with lc. topics to lab Pl~lf - Return with lamples to lab OR~GE - Sender's copy ~- - · fin.ual Put iracer Size Pro,uct' i'n~'c. C~2O IncheSGallon .Tes Ret.,, Gri ,,dr ~,rough_RmountDo(lom"epth to ~1/~z~/l-~ !~, l~l'~-I'~,'-! .....i , I ! "t 1 I~ I sl'/~ I 0~ I D~'I~I ~ ! 't~ I r I , , I t ~ t I J~ ~ I 'Cilu -' 't Slate Zip '- 6~LI~SS~8 : 'ON BNOHd NI]HUS : NO~ '1 PREPARED FOR: Horizon Engineering 936 East Javelina Suite 1 Mesa, Arizona.85214 Tracer Tight® Test of 4 Underground Storage Tanks at the Texaco ~61-058-0700 3698 Ming Real Road Bakersfield, CA August 10, 1992 Trac~esearch Corporation SUBMITTED BY: TRACFffi. RESEARCH CORPORATION {OB # 0103~9c I $ T~ac~esea~'ch ITABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 ! CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ................... i .............................................. .2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 2 CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... , ....... 3 APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. EPA Test Evaluation .................................... ' ...................................... 4 APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA ................................................................................................ 5 APPENDIX C - FIGURES ........... ' .......................................................................................................... .6 I O Trace~ese.rch Corporation I INTROI)U(JTION I Horizon Engineering and Tracer Research Corporation performed Tracer Tight® leak testing of 4 underground storage tanks at the Texaco #61-058-0700 site in Bakersfield, CA. I The tanks were inoculated with tracer on July 14, 1992, to a concentration of approximately 10 ppm. Samples were collected on July 29, 1992. The following table shows the tank size, type of I tracer in each tank, fuel through put factor in the first 72 hours after inoculation and total amount of tracer introduced into each tank: TANK # SIZE(GAL) TRACER FACTOR AMOUNT(G) Tank 1 10,000 DA 1 Tank 2 10,000 FB 1 Tank 3 10,000 DA 1 Tank 4 10,000 FB 1 250 200 250 200 The following table shows the type of product in the tank, the product level and the water level in each tank measured in inches at the time of inoculation and sampling. AT INOCULATION AT. SAMPLING TANK # PRODUCT H20 PRODUCT H20 PRODUCT Tank 1. Diesel 0.00 29.00 0.00 18.00 Tank 2 Unleaded 0.00 20.00 0.00 40.00 Tank 3 Unleaded 0.00 18.00 0.00 13.00 Tank 4 Premium 0.00 31.00 0.00 19.00 The depth to water in the tank pit was determined to be >14 feet below grade. The groundwater conditions were stable. -1- I 0 Trac~:le.earch Corp.ratiorl I CONCEPT Ok' AND IMPLEMENTATION OPERATION I The tracer leak detection method relies upon the addition of a highly volatile liquid chemical to the product in the tank. ff a leak occurs in the underground storage system, fuel is i released into the surrounding soil. The tracer escapes from the fuel by vaporization and disperses into the soil by molecular diffusion. Various means are used to sample the soil vapors in the immediate vicinity of the underground storage tanks and associated piping. Each probe I has an effective detection radius of approximately 10 to 12 feet. This means that a given probe should detect a leak anywhere within the area described by the 10 foot radius around the probe. I The tracer must be placed in the tank at least two weeks prior to the probe sampling for this method to be effective. This process of leak detection by placing a liquid or gas tracer in a I liquid product followed by detection of the tracer underground in the vapor phase is protected under TRACER patents. i The throughput factor is used to determine the amount of tracer chemical used to inoculate a given tank. The throughput factor is a multiplier and is based on the number of.tank refills expected within the first three days after inoculation. The multiplied amount of tracer is used to I maintain the concentration of tracer in the tank to at least 10 ppm over the first 3 days after inoculation based on the estimated amount of fuel to be received during this period. I LEAK DETECTION CRITERIA The classification of leakage is based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS FAIL Criteria: Criteria: NO tracer detected tracer detected Total volatile hydrocarbon (TVHC) concentrations are measured to. give additional information about site conditions. The TVHC data provide information about the severity of the leakage, and the degree of any possible environmental damage that may have occurred. The TVHC data is not used as a criterion factor to determine the status of a particular tank(s) or piping and is provided as supplemental information only. -2- I ~ 'r,-~,=~,n...,,r.=h Co,-po,-.taor, I CERTIFICATION I Job Number: 010389c Date: 08/10/92 i Location: Texaco #61-058-0700 3698 Ming Real Road Bakersfield, CA TANK # PRODI ICT SIZE{gal) TRACER LEAK STATUS Tank I Diesel 10,000 DA Pass O~ Tank 2 Unleaded 10,000 FB Pass Tank 3 Unleaded 10,000 DA Fail Tank 4 Premium 10,000 FB Pass Tracer Research Corporation certifies that the tank and pipe systems listed in the above table have been tested by means of Tracer Tight®, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision leak test. According to EPA standard test procedures for evaluating leak detection methods, the Tracer Tight® method is capable of detecting leaks of 0.05 gallons per hour with a Probability of Detection (PD) of 0.97 and Probability of False Alarm (P~:^) of 0.029. Submitted by: Ma~y ~~ ~~' Tracer Research Corporation Testers State License Number: 95-1518 The following criteria are used for the classification of leakage based on the presence or absence of tracer. PASS Criteria~. No tracer detected FAIL Criteria: tracer detected -3- APPENDIX A - Results of U.S. -4- esearch Corporacion EPA Test Evaluation I Trac~eaearch Corporation I I Results of U.S. EPA.Standard.Evaluation Nonvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Method This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method described below complies with the performance require.merits of the federal tmdergroupd storage tank regulation. T~.e evaluation was conducted by the equipment manutacturer or a consultant to the manufacturer according to the U.S. EPA's "Standard Test Procedure for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: N-onvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Methods." The full evaluation report also includes a form describing the method and a f6rm summarizing the test data. Tank owners using this leak detectionsystem should keep this form on file to prove compliance with ttie federal regulations. Tank and local should check with State owners agencies to make sure thi.q form satisfies their requirements. Method Description Name: Tracer Rese0xch C0roorati0n Vendor: Tracer Research C0rborlati0n 9855 North Business-Center Drive  rv, et addt~sz) cson Arizona 85705 (city) (state) (zip) [602) [388-9400 hone) Evaluation Results This method, which, declares a tank to be le .a~dn.' g when a threshold amount of Tracer chemical is detected as a vaoor in the soil outside the 1[ .o. pk has an estimated probabili.ty of false alarms [P(FA)] of 2.9% based on the test results of 1 false alarms out of ~;¢ tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from 0 to 8.5 %. The corresponding probab'.dity of detection [P(D)] of .a 0.005 gallon per hour leak i.s~1 % based on the test results of 33 detections out o[ ~34 stmulated leak tests. A 95% confidence interval for P(D) is from 91,5 to 100..%. Does this method use additional modes of leak'detection? [ ] Yes IX] No If Yes, complete additional evaluation results on page 3 of thi~ torm. Based on the results above, and on page 3 if applicable, this method [X] does [] does not. meet the federal performance standa/ds established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.10 gallon per hour at P(D) of 95% and P(FA) of 5%). Test Conditions During Evaluation The evaluation testing was conducted in a ~ gallon [~_ steel [X] fiber~a.5.s tank that was inches in diameter and mches long, insfalled in backfill. The ground-water level was ~ inches above the bottom of the tank. I TracJllesearch Corporation I I NonvoDmetric TIT Method Tracer Tight (TM) :. I "Version Test Conditions During Evaluation (continued) The tests were conducted with the tank v .arying percent full. The temperature difference between lxoduct added to fill the tank and product already in the tank ranged from N/A °F to N'/A °F, with a standard deviation of N/A °F. The product used in the evaluation was va _rying gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and heating oil. This method m_ay be affected by_ other sources of interference. List these interferences below and give the ranges of conditions under which the evaluation was done. (Check None if not apph~cable.) [ ] None Interferences Range of Test Conditions Limitations on the Results i T he performance has not been substantially changed. The vendor's instructions for using the method are followed. The tank contains a product identified on the method description form. The tank capacity is gallons or smaller. .The differefice between ailded and in-tank product .temperatures is no greater than + or - degrees Fahrenheit. [] Check if applicable: Temperature is not a factor became Tracer detection outside of tank 00Cs no~; depend on fuel temperature inside tank. Temperature does not affect the amount of T?acer released. * The waiting time between the end of filling the test tank and the start of the test data collection is at least hours. * .The waiting time between the end of "topping off' to final testing level and the start of the test data collection is at least <X, hours. * The total data collection time 'for the test is at least hours. * The product volume in the tank during testing is ~100% full. * This method [ ] can [ ] cannot be used ff the ground-water level is above the bottom of the tank. Other limitations specified by the vendor or determined during testing: 1, After Tracer chemical is added, voll must wait at leost 14 davs to ~:0llect samoles from vat>or probes. 2. Alternative aoo?oaches must be used if to~ of tank is under water. Tliese approaches are available fl/rough Tracer Research Corp_. Trac~esearch Corporation Nonvolumetric TIT Method Tracer Tieht (TMi . > Safety Disclatmen This test procedure .only addresses the issue of the method's ability to detect leaks. It does not test the eqmpment for safety hazards. Additional Evaluation Results (if applic This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when~ h. as an estimated probability or- false alarms [P(FA)] of __ % based on the test results of __ false alarms out of__ tests. Note: 3~ perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is to from 0 The corresponding probability o.f detection [P(D)] of a gallon per hour leak is ~% based on t~e test results of detections out of simulated leak tests. Note: A perfect score during tes.~ not mean that the me~ perfect. B~ased on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(D) is from 0 to %. · Water detection mode (if applicable) Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum water level that the water sensor can detect with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. .Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum change in water level that the water sensor can Oetect with a 95% probability of detection is N/-A inches. Based on the minimum water level and change in water level that the water sensor can detect with a false .alarm rate of 5% and a 95°~ probabili~ of detection, the minimum time for the to aetect an increase in water level at an incursion rate of 0.10 gallon system per hour is N/A minutes in a N/A - gallon tank. Certification of Results I cert'.fly that the nonvolumetric tank tightness testing method was installed and operated accoramg to the vendor's instruction.-I also certify that the evaluation was performed according to test procedure to tank tightness testing the standard EPA nonvolumetric methods and that the results presentedabove are those obtained during the evaluation. H. Kendall Wilcox Ken Wilcox Associates ~:~ .r~nt~l name) (o ~r?ni,ation pcffoxnning s-valuation) 0ignatu~) October 4. 1990 (date) Blue Sorin~s. Missouri 64015 (city, mt-c, zip)- (o8 ~1o6~ 229-0860 number) i~3d3 I 0 Trac~l:~esearch =arpara~ion ! ! APPENDIX B - ANALYTICAL DATA -5- 3698 Ning Road/Real, Bakersfield, CA 010389c 8/10/92 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound Page 1 Concentration 001 FB 0.0000 001 BCF 0.0000 001 DA 0.0000' 001 TVHC 0.0000 002 FB 002 BCF 002 DA 002 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 .0001. 0.0000 003 FB 003 BCF 003 DA 003 TVHC 004 F8 004 BCF 004 DA 004 TVHC 005 FB 005 BCF 005 DA 005 TVHC 006 FB 006 BCF 006 DA 006 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .0005 23.,1810 0.0000 0o0000 0.0000 5.2440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 007 FB 007 BCF 007 DA 007 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Horizon/Texaco No. 61-058-0700 3698 Hing Road/Rea], Bakersfield, CA 010389c Trac/esearch Corporation 8/10/92 Locat i on 008,009,010,011 008,009,010,011 008,009,010,011 008,009,010,011 CONDENSED DATA Compound F8 BCF DA TVHC Page 2 Concentration 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 BLANK01 FB BLANK01 BCF BLANK01 DA BLANK01 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in mg/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) Trac~l!lesearch Corporation Horizon/Texaco No. 61-058-0700 3698 Hing/Re&l, Bakersfield, CA 010389aFS 7/24lg2 CONDENSED DATA i P&go 1 Loc&t~on Compound Concentr&t~on 001 FB 0.0000 001 BCF 0.0000 001 DA 4.2510 002 FB -99999999999.0000 002 BOF '-99999999999,0000 002 DA -99999999999.0000 003 FB 003 BP.A= 003 DA 004 FB 004 BCF 004 DA i-99999999999.0000 -99999999999.0000 -99999999999.0000 -99999999999.0000 -99999999999.0000 -99999999999.0000 Tracers ~n mg/L : 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tr&cer (0.0001) -99999999999 = No sm~pla Tract~lesearch Corporation APPENDIX C - FIGURES -6- EXPLANATION · 1 Sampling Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING l l '9 '8 l li- 10' 0103§9c ---N 0 5 10 f e e t TEXACO 61-058-0700 3098 MING R EAI~ BA K E R.'I F I E L P , CALIFORNIA I SAilPLING LOCAT]ONS{ Figure Tank 1 0 0 10,000 gal Diesel Tracer [DA] O Fill Tank 2 0 0 10,000 Unleaded Tracer [FB] O FIII Tank 3 0 0 0,000 gal Plus Tracer [DA] .0 Fill Tank 4 0 0 10,000 gal Premium Tracer [FB] O Fill .1 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street,~Bakersfteld, ~A 9~3.0]t-~ APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST RECEIVED NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED / IS PIPING GOING TO 'BE TESTED ~/~ ! TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS TANK TESTING COMPANY ~. ~.~s~o~ ~ ~J--//_~/ ~ ,~ ~ ~s~ ~s ~o .~ co,~,.,~,~ //~/~-~/ / APP.OVED S~' ' hATE · ' I~GN~LICANT Associated Environmental Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 80427 Bakersfield, CA 93380 (805) 393-2212 AES -- SYSTEM II PRECISION TANK & LINE TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Invoice Address: I EXA~O USA 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY CA 91608 Tank Location: TEXACO STATION 3698 MING AVE BAKERSFIELD CALIF W.O.~: 15736 I.D. Number: N/A Technician:BNL Tech.~:89165 Van#:6105 Date: 11/15/91 Time Start: 20:00 End: 23:30 County: KE Facility Phone#: 1-805-834-2822 Groundwater Depth: N/A Blue Prints: N/A Contact: ,~4GR Date;Time system was filled: 11/15/91 19;00 Tank Fill/Vent Tank Capacity Product Tank Vapor Lines Product Type Of Vapor Line Recovery Inches of Pump Tank Water/Tank Type Material I 1OK REG PASS PASS PASS PH-2 0 0 TURB S W S Additional Information: SITE LOG TIME Set Up Equip: 20:00 Bled Product Lines: 20:05 Bled Vapor Lines: 20:10 Bled Vent lines: 20:15 Bled Turbine: 20:05 Bled Suction Pump: N/A Risers Installed: N/A a) This~ system and method meets the criteria set forth in NFPA b) Any failure listed above may require further action~ check with all regulatory ~agen~ies. : California O.T.T.L. Number : 1131 / //~/]' )1 ASSOC.~TE~ SYSTEMS TEXACO VENTS AVE E L ,-) L -- TLS -2~ Site La,out For: TEXACO 36~8 MING ~VE BAKERSFIELD CALTF AES/oSystem II Precision Invoice No.: 15736 Technician: BNL Volume(gal): 10000 Water Level On Tank(in) Specific Gravity: .75 Calibration Value(mi): Level Segment From: leak ~yst~ems, Test Graph Date: 11/15/91 Time : 20:48:43 Tank: 1 Tank Diameter(in): 91 Grade Level(in): 135 Product Level(in): 108 0 Coefficient Of Expansion: 0.0006588 500 Channel: 1 To 225 Temp Segment From: 1 To 225 T II ,I ,, Il , ":::' ..... J'"J 0 l,,,lt'" ':::: Change In Calibration Zone = 18 Starting Temperature (F): 75. 677 Surface Area(sq, in): 166.8 Level volume(gph): 1.24 Temp. volume(gph): 1.26 Net change(gph) : -0.02 ---->PASS 1989 by AES, Inc. Copyright (c) ** Notes ** TEXACO.STATION , 3698 MING AVE FIRST AND SECOND HOURS. Calibration Unit(gal/unit) = 0.00722 Head Pressure(~ol/in (Btm)): 81.0 Temp. Change(F/h) : 0.193 Product Line(gph): .000 P/L ----> PASS BAKERSFIELD CALIF. 500 ML-CAL MID LEVEL TEST..~ Associated Environmental Systems, Inc. I-'.0. Box 80427 Bakersfield, CA 93380 (805) -393-221"" HYDROSTATIC F'RODUCT LINE TEST WORK SHEET l,::,oT PRODUCT I START END -S'I'ART END TEST V[]L. NJ]. I TIME TiME VDL. (hlL) VOL. (ML) DIFF. (MI-) i I t I t i i I 1 I I I. ......................... I_.2' ................................. 1 ............... I I D:i. vide the roi|line differential by the test time ( 15 minutes) and ~u.'.itiply by 0.0158311, which will convert the volume differential fro~ milliliters per minute to gallons per. hour. The conversion constant is found by : (60 rain/hr)/(3790 mi/gal) = 0.01583ii (rain/hr) (gal/ml) ~The conversion constant causes the milliliters and minutes to cancel out. .,.-::::?/!'-':~:.'- , , , . .-' ., , . '.. .'. "-3'/15.mi./min. X 0.0158311 ('rain/hr) (gal/mi).`= 0;003 gal/hr'.. ': ;"-' RESULTS'OF THIS WORK SFIEET.'~O'BE' COMPILED O.N ~RESULTS sHEET. :'"""'"' ; Associated Environmental Systems, LEAK inc. AES DETECTOR RESULTS TECHNICIAN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX PRODUCT : TYPE TYPE OF LEAK DETECTOR ~ PLD SERIAL NUMBER: ~/9 TESTED (CIRCLE ONE) XLP OTHER RESIDUAL VOLUME ~! mi. FULL OPERATING PRESSURE ~ FUNTIONAL ELEMENT HOLDING PRESSURE METERING TIME ~ sec. METERING PRESSURE ~ PSI. PSI. psi. INDUCED LEAK RATE OF 3 GPH ~ 10 PSI USING RED JACKET FTA LEAK DETECTOR DID RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK ~ LEAK DETECTOR DID NOT RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK ' FAIL REPLACED FAILED LEAK DETECTOR? .(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXX TYPE OF NEW LEAK DETECTOR DLD PLD XLP OTHER SERIAL NUMBER OF NEW LEAK DETECTOR DETECTOR DID RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK PASS LEAK DETECTOR DID NOT RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK FAIL· Headquarters · P.O. Box 80427, Bakersfield, CA 93380 * (805) 393-2212 · (800) 23743067 . · '365.1'Pegasus Drive, Suite 102 · Bakersfield, CA 93308 * U.S. (800) ;426-2i13 ' '"" ' ·'' '..."' · .... · ~..-' :'.. , .. ... SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. 80X 2007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 9~609 212-875-0820 ! 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX SUBJECT: A/~NUAL ELECTRONIC/MECHg~NICAL I~ONITORING SYSTE~ INSPECTION A/~D ~E~ER CALIBRATION DATE: 6/17/92 STATION # 700 ADDRESS: 3698 MING AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA .,A~TN: FRED LONG This is to certify that the annual inspection of the existing monitoring system was performed at the above referenced facility. The method used to test the Electronic and Mechanical monitoring systems is approved by and exceeds the specifications according to the manufacturer. R.J. Myers & sons, Inc. has been contracted by IEXAC0 R&M to insu~ze that their facilities comply with all the rules and regulations tha~ govern the operations of underground storage tanks and product lines. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, N.J. ~ERS & SONS, INC. -~Ronald.J.....~Myers ~ Vice President R~/td CONT. LIC. #330631 (8..O61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 3007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126' 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX TEXACO R&M 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608 Attn: FRED LONG STATION LOCATION: 700 RE: LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM CERTIFICATION For your information and records, the leak detection system at the above referenced site was certified on Sons, Inc. as indicated below. PRODUCT LINE TYPE PMS-800 MONITOR Non Existing X Operational Non Operational 6/17/92 by R. J. Myers & TANK TYPE TLS-250 MONITOR __Non Existing X .Operational Non Operational P~SE TYPE MONITOR Non Existing X Operational __Non Operational Please feel free to contract our office for any questions you may have regarding your leak detection equipment. Sincerely, . ~~ Myers Vice President Ru-M: tlk CONT. LIC. #330631 (8q;61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STA'~ON CONSTRUCT[ON / PErRO 'riTE TANK & LINE TES'[]NG P.O. BOX 3OO7 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX DATE OF SERVICE 6 / 17 / 9 2 STATION ~. 7 0 0 TECHNICIAN: S. M 0 S E R SERVICE REQUESTED BY: F. PROBE I.D. NUMBERS: BIT,T, TO: TEXACO R&M 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY, CA SERVICE REQUESTED: ANNUAL MONITOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK: TEST LINE TEST MECHANICAL LEAK DETECTORS, FACILITY INSPECTION. CERTIFICATION PRESSURE SWITCHES CALIBRATE DISPENSERS W.O ~ 1106407-001 LONG UNL L]~E PRESSURE pLUS CHANGE FTITFRS ~0DELf PMS-800 · - 'SYSTEM CERTIF. IED ' WASTE OIL NO NO LEFT FOR JOB SITE: ARRIVED AT JOB SITE: LEFT JOB SITE: RETURNED TO BASE: SERIAL~ SYSTEM PSD SYSTEM SEALED 1065' CONT. UC. ~r~0631 ¢-(61) SERVING THE PETROLEUI~ [NOUSTRY SINCE 1967 SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETR0 TITE TANK & UNE TESTING P.O. BOX 2007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA. 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX DATE OF SERVICE 6 / 17 / 9 2 STATION ~ 700 W.O.~ 1106407-001 TECHNICIAN: S. MOSER SERVICE P~EQUESTED BY: F. LONG BILr. TO: .PROBE I.D. I~ERS: UNLEADED SUPER TEXACO R&M PLUS 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608 SERVICE REQUESTED: ANNUAL MONITOR CERTIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK: STICK TANKS AND COMPARE READINGS WITH TLS-250. ALL SYSTEMS WITHIN CALIBRATION. I~0DEL# VEEDER-R00T TLS-250 SERIAL~ 5~)9 .WASTE. OIL YES ~) NO NO YES ~ NO SYSTEM SEALED LEFT FOR JOB SITE: ARRIVED AT JOB SITE: LEFT JOB SITE: RETURNED TO BASE: NO CONT. UC. #330631 (8-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM {NOUSTRY S[NCE 1967 TANK EQUIPMA/qT SURVEY FORM SS~- 700 · ~c- 3698 MING AVE CI'fY/STATE: BAKERSFIELD, CA COUNTY: T~HNK_INFO~MATION: TANK ! SIZE: 10000 PRODUCT: UNL STEEL/FIBERGLASS: F/G SiNGLE/~DOi/Bi~ALL: SINGLE INSTALI~TION DATE: UNK T~LNK TE~ DATE: UNK LINE TEST DATE: UNK TANKS SIPHONED: 0 ENGR/ANALYST- OFFICE: TEI~-PHONE: SUPERVISOR: F. LONG TANK 2 TANK 3 TANK 4 T;LNK 5 10000 10000 10000 55O ~UP -P-[-0S -DIE -W/0 F/G F/G F/G F/G SING EE SINGEE SINGLE D/W UNK -UNK 'UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK -UNK UNK UNK -0 -0 0 0 Pj{O!YJCT LYhng_INFOt~TION: LINE STRUO~i~E: F/G D/W SECONDARY C/DNTAINMENT' NONE STEEL/FIBERGLASS SINGLE/DOUBLEWALL FIBERTRENCH, LINER, or OTHER QTHER IbF~RMATION- SURW~F_RSIBLE PUMP IiANUFACTLrRER : T,VAK DETECTOR M~/qUFAC~R : TANK IP~AK DETEGTION MANUFAG~IURER: LINE LEAK DETECTION ~UFAOTURF-/{: OVF_/IFII~PROI~EG~CION: IFB~~AT : SPILL OONTAINI~ BOX : SIZE : ALrl~MATIC TANK C~AUGING: TTPE : V~POR REOOVF/RY: STAGE I : STAGE II: MONITORING MONITORING ~LLS: YES G/W PROBES IN WELLS : NO TOKHEIM/~ JACKE~ DIESEL 3/4H. P. PMS-800 TLS-250 PMS-800 - 90% ... 90%(16") or 95:~(6") - YES YES or NO 5 (5) or (15) GAIzI~DNS' YES YES or NO ~0 %"A-FJ)E~T, ETC .... :OAX OOAX, DUAL POII~ or- ~GoI~r PICK UP PER TANK YES NO YES or NO 4 NO. OF WELLS WLDOSE or GROUNDWATER YES or NO TYPE OF PROBES WELLS LOCKED AND COLOR CODED: YES. YES or NO ATTACH .~Lr, TANK %"EST RESV3LTS, T~R~K 1~~ P~IRt~ITS ~RqD ST~kt~T tiP %r~iR.IFIC~ION FOR~S M'IRf)M MONITORING SY~'l~f~- ~ ~ EnvJronmenta Awareness R.J. HYERS & SONS, P.O. BOX 3007 NO. HOLLYWOOD, (213) 875-0830 (818) 768-2126 INC. 1609 Annual Environmental Facility'tnspection Retail Marketing Address 3698 MING AVE. Inspector S. MOSER jOate6/17/92 Fac.~ 700 I Dispenser/Pump ~Leak No leak Repaired. YiN Ill Leak D~tectors Leak INn leak Repaired! Y/N Housing X Piping X Check Valve Test X × Sea{e~ (Y/N} Y Hoses X Nozzles Proper Clearance to Lid y (V Compliance Monitoring Wells Fittings X Impact Valve Operational (Y/N} y C~ps Secured & Locked (YiN} y Fil'ter Warning Signs (Y/N) y Box Covers Fit Propedy (Y/N} y il Tanks V Visual Premises Check Electronic Tank Monitors (Y/N} y Piping X Operational Emergency Pump Shut Off (Y/N} Fi[is Tagged (Y/N} y Switch Operational Y Check for Evidence Fill Boxes Free of Dirt, (Y/N) Debds, Water Y o! Sp{lIs: Fill Box Drain Valve, . (Y/N)' Low Spots Around Facility Operational (if present) .... y property.. N 0 N E Landscaped Area 0 K Vapor R~.overy Fittings X submerged Pumps · · .'- '. ~ Nearby Ditches, C4'eeks, Et.c. X N/A Turbine Relays (Y/N) ~ VI D~aledFranchlse~ - Ask Operational RII Drop'Tubes Any leaks reported within (Y/NJ past year N Any spills reported within (YIN} N Top of 45° Taper <6' frTank Bottom (Y/N} Y past year Note: All discovered leaks are to be repected by phone to ARCO l,~[a[nten~ee prior to g Comments Inspector's Signature APPC-248-C (6-90) LDT 880 LEAK DET, ECTOR CHEC_KLIST CONTRACTOR CUSTOMER R.J. MYERS & SONS, TNC. TEXACO 700 DATE I PRODUCT LOCATION 6/17/92 I DIESEL 3698 MING AVE. TECHNICIAN S. MOSER BAKERF[ELDS, CA SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION · CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 11014289-3036 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM !GILBARCO BENNEFF DRESSER i BOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE I I RED JACKET II RED JACKET MODEL 116-030 L~ MODEL 116~317 PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE DATE 11/1/89 S/N 9018 'MOOEL116-011AI I MODEL585PM I DLD 5SEC I I DLD 2SEC .~.:.1 ROUND HEAD I SQUARE HEAD' GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER III GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 2 2 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML IV PRESSURE STEPTEST WITH BO3'FOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN S~DS GUAGE 2 NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER X END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1Vt-3GAL PER MINUTE YES X NO C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES X NO.__ X YES NO YES NO X LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~ FAIL / PUR~ORA ~/AP~RLE$S FORM LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE - TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS [[[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE IV PRESSURE STEP TEST-SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC.' 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE LEAK DETECTOR TEST YES NO YES NO YES ' NO PASS~_J FAILI I ,CONTRACTOR CUSTOMER R.Jo MYERS & SONS, TNC. TEXACO 700 DATE 6/:[7/92 IPRODUCT SUPER LOCATION 3698 MTNG AVE. TECHNICIAN S, MOSER BAKERSFIELD, CA SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION · CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 55037014 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM G[LBARCO BENNE3'r DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE RED JACKET I I RED JACKET MODEL 116-030 MODEL 116-017 PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE DATE 2/1/89 S/N5085 OLD,SEC II OL SEO ....I I GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE , ~ ~ psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML IV PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE 2 NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V~-3GN. PER MINUTE WtLL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES X NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. IV'z-3GAL PER MINUTE YES X NO C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING X PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS X~ FAIL/ LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE -TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LOT INSTRUCTIONS [[[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE psig. [¥ PRESSURE STEP TEST-SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE sEC.. ¥ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1V~3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES .NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS[.~J FAILI I LDT 880 :..LEAK DETECTOR CHECKLIST CONTRACTOR I CUSTOMER R.J. HYERS & SONS, INC. !XACO 700 DATE 6/17/92 IPRODUCT PLUS LOCATION 3698 MING AVE. TECHNICIAN S. MOSER BAKERSFIELD, CA SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION · CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 550370:[2 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNI_~-r DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE RED JACKET I IREDJACKET MODEL116~330 MODEL116~17 PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD DATE 3/2/92 S/N 7984 X 'MODEL116~11AI I MODEL58SPM I I DLD 5SEC I I DLD 2SEC .~.,.I ] ROUND HEAD I SQUARE HEAD' I PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER III IV GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 2 3 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEst POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE 2 NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1'/2~3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YESX NO__ DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. ¥ 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES" NO C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BoTroM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO X LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~ FAIL| PUR¢~ORA~VAPO~LE$S FORM 880A ~) LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE- TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS [[[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE psig. IV PRESSURE STEP TEST-SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU~3UT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FUU.Y (CC4W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-36AL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~ FAIL{ LDT 880_- LEAK DETECTOR CHECKLIST CONTRACTOR R. J. NYERS DATE 6/17/92 TECHNICIAN S. MOSER . j CUSTOMER ~ TEXACO 700 LOCATION 3698 MING AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 55037012 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER II LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE REDJACKET MODEL116-030 PLD-2SEC HEX HEAD DATE NO TAG S/N NO TAG MODEL 116-017 'MODEL 116-011A MODEL 585PM ~ I DLD 2SEC X DLD 5SEC DLD 2SEC .....I I HEX HEAD ROUND HEAD SQUARE HEAD~ I PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER II][ GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 2 3 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML [V PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE 2 NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. ¥ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE WiLL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER X END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. I'I2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO X C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO X COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES X NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~.~ FAILI X PUR;~ORA ~/APORLE$$ FORM LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE -TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS ][][][ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE __ psig. ][¥ PRESSURE STEP TEST-SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. ¥ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~. FAIL| LDT 880 -_[_EAK DETECTOR CHEC_.KLIST CONTRACTOR R . J . MYERS & SONS I DATE PRODUCT 6 / 17 / 92 I UNLEADED TECHNICIAN S. MOSER I SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CUSTOMER ~ TEXACO 700 LOCATION 3698 MING AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 55037013 RED WAYNE A.D. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER II LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE REDJACKET I IREDJACKET MODEL116-030 MODEL116~17 PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD BATE 3/2/89 S/N 7985 'MODELll6-011A~ I MODEL585PM I I DLD 5SEC I I DLD 2SEC .,...I I ROUND HEAD I SQUARE HEAD'~ I PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER [[[ GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE 2 2 psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML IV PRESSURE STEPTEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE 2 SEC. 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER X END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES X NO C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES__NO X GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO X LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS X~. FAILI PLJ~I~Ot:~ 'VAPORLESS FORM LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE -TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS [[[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE psig. [¥ PRESSURE STEP TEST.SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CC/W) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEC. ¥ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~___ FAIL LDT 880.= LEAK DETECTOR CHECKLIST CONTRACTOR R,J. NYERS & DATE 6/17/92 SONS TEXACO 700 TECHNICIAN S. HOSER BAKERSFIELD, CA [ SUBMERSIBLE PUMP IDENTIFICATION CUSTOMER LOCATION CHECK MFG. INDICATE MODEL NO. IF KNOWN RECORD SERIAL # 550370:[3 RED WAYNE A.O. SMITH KEENE WEST JACKET TOKHEIM ~GILBARCO BENNETT DRESSER BOWSER SOUTH OTHER LEAK DETECTOR IDENTIFICATION CHECK TYPE REDJACKET ! IREDJACKET MODEL116-030 MODEL116~17 PLD-2SEC DLD 2SEC HEX HEAD HEX HEAD DATE 10/4/86 S/N 3168 'MODELll6-011AI ~ MODEL585PM I I X DLD 5SEC I I DLD 2SEC .,...I I ROUND HEAD I SQUARE HEAD~ I PRE-TEST CONDITIONS VOLUME OF PRODUCT FLUSHED THRU LINE GALLONS OTHER COMMENTS TEST PROCEDURE LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLED TEST AT DISPENSER GENERAL LINE AND PUMP INFORMATION 22 RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE __ psig. AIR-VAPOR TEST WITH PUMP OFF MEASURE AND RECORD ML PRESSURE STEP TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION TURN ON PUMP RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE 2 SEC. V 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST 2 0 0 ML' B) OPEN DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 1V~-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES ,NO X; DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1'/2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO X ~ C) CLOSE DISPENSER NOZZLE OR PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: ' GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO X GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES X NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES X ~NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~ FAILI ,' PURI3OP~/APORLE$S FORM 8~3A ~) LEAK DETECTOR ISOLATED FROM PRODUCT LINE -TEST AT PUMP PIT REFER TO LDT INSTRUCTIONS [[[ GENERAL PUMP INFORMATION FLUSH LDT TESTOR RECORD OPERATING PUMP PRESSURE ~: psig. [¥ PRESSURE STEP TEST-SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REMAINS ON THRU-OUT TEST PROCEDURE WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN PRESSURE STEP TEST POSITION ROTATE ISOLATOR FULLY (CCA/V) RECORD TIME IN SECONDS GUAGE NEEDLE REMAINS IN COLORED ZONE SEc, ¥ 3 GALLON PER HOUR LEAK SIMULATED TEST WITH BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3 GPH TEST POSITION A) MEASURE AND RECORD VOLUME IN CALIBRATED BEAKER FOR 60 SECOND TEST ML B) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN DISPENSER NOZZLE POSITION. FLOW RATE OF APPROX. 11/2-3GAL PER MINUTE WILL BE OBSERVED. DOES GUAGE NEEDLE MOVE TO LOWER END OF COLORED ZONE YES NO DOES FLOW RATE INCREASE TO APPROX. 1V2-3GAL PER MINUTE YES NO C) PLACE BOTTOM SELECTOR IN 3GPH TEST POSITION: GUAGE RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GUAGE DOES NOT RETURN TO COLORED ZONE YES NO GAUGE GOES TO OPERATING PRESSURE YES NO LEAK DETECTOR TEST PASS ~ FAIL| RED JACKET~0 WARRANTY REGISTRATION CARD" Installer: This form must be completed and returned ~o Red Jacket ~o qualify for future warranty consideration. A copy of this form should be kept for your own record keeping of product location. INSTAl,LING ORGANTZATION Company R.J. MYERS & SONS, Address 10641 STAGG ST. City. SUN VALLEY Installe~'~"lXTame S. M 0 S E R INC. State C A Zip 913 5 2 LOCATION OF LEAK DETECTOR INSTALLATION Company T E X h C 0 Address 3698 MING AVE. City BAKERSFIELD State CA Zip 93309 Record each leak detector serial # installed at this location and indicate the type of fuel in the tank. Date Codes and Serial #'s for each loc. Indicate fuel type: P L U S Ex: reg., un]., etc. Indicate additives ff known: Ex: methanol, ethanol, MTBE, etc. Age of Tank u N K Tank Material F / G LD #1 LD #2 LD #3 3/2/92 3/2/92 7984 7985 UNL LD #4 UNK F/G -SOLENOID A = Head(feet) Pressure (psi) = Head (feet) x S.G, 2.31 S.G. = SpeclficGravlty Gasoline = .70 Diesel = .90 APPLICATION PARA1VIETERS: * Test each unit according to manufacturer's instructions and per EPA CFR 280A4 (a) and'280~40 ' (a)(3). For testing instructions see Leak Detector manual IAI 041-978 or Engineering Report RJ-20. * The system must be free of en- trapped air. * Static head must not exceed 1-1/2 psi. (3' = 1 psi approx,) For more information on static head see: RJ-23-5. RETURN TOP COPY OF THIS FORM TO: The Marley Pump Company ATTN: WARRANTY DEPARTMENT 500 E. 59th St. Davenport, IA 52808 YELLOW- [NSTAU.ER PINK - CUSTOMER WHITE - RETURN COPY THE MARLEY PUMP, COMPANY A Divir, ion of The Mm*ley Company 091-381 Rev. A 12/90 No, Type of Report: (Please circle one) Equipment Transfer, Product Transfer, Pump Test, Intercompany Data Form Repair, Station Audit, Station Opening, Station Sold, Product Changes. Station Closing. Location Name TEXACO Location No. 700 Date B/:17/92 Address 3698 MING Git5, BAKERSFIELD State CA Failure Reported P.O. AFE No. Service call made Time arrived arrffpn Marketing Rep. Rep. No. Time Comp. am/pn In addition to correcting the proble~n reported, please perform the following: Repair Time Stick all tanks with water finding paste. Read.all pump totalizers. Travel Time Record data below including product type and pump no. where necessary. TYPE U N L No. i TYPE S U P No. i TYPE P L U S No. 1 Meter Readings Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 246849 625 196147 725 068141 675 Before 246844 196142 068136 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- 00 00 + 1 Cor. After +/- TYPE UNL No. 2 TYPE SUP No. 2 TYPE PLUS No. 2 Meter Reaclin~ Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 258166 625 193825 725 060742 675 Before 258161 193820 060737 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- - 1 - 2 CDr. After +/- TYPE U N L No. 3 TYPE S U P No. 3 TYPE P L U S No. 3 Meter Readings Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After EU3471 625 147367 725 072594 675 Before ?'03466 147362 072589 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- 00 - 1 + 1 Cor. After +/- TYPE 01 E No. 3 TYPE U N L No. 4 TYPE S U P No. 4 Meter Readings Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 062589 625 234673 625 169255 725 Before 062584 ' 234968 169250 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- + 2 - 2 00 Cot. After Product TYPE TYPE ~TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE Stick Readings Inches Water Product TYPE TYPE !TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE Stick Readings Inches Water Type of Report: (Please circle onel Equipment Transfer, Product Transfer, Pump Test. NO. Intercompany Data Form Repair, Station Audit, Station Opening, Station Sold, Product Changes. Station Closing. Location Name TEXACO Location No. '700 Date Address City State Failure Reported 6/17/92 P.O. AFE No. . Service call made Marketing Rep.. Rep. No. In addition to correcting the problem reported, please perform the following: Stick all tanks with water finding paste. Read.all pump totalizers. Record data below including product type and pump no. where necessary. Time arrived arrdpn Time Comp. am/pr. Repair Time Travel Time TYPE PI II.q No. 4 TYPE r'ITF No. 4 TYPE UNI No. 5 Meter Readin~ Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dol/ars After 077878 675 049857 625 053688 625 Before 077873 049852 053683 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- 00 + '1 + 1 Cot. After +/- , 1TPE .c;I I P No. 5 TYPE PLUS,No. UN! TYPE .DIE No. 6 Meter Readings Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 050870 725 005967 675 060485 625 Before 050865 005962 060480 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- - 1 0 0 - 2 Cot. After +/- TYPE SUp No. 6 ITYPE PLUS No. 6 TYPE. UNL INo. 7 Meter Readings G~lons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 059659 725 007047 675 043289 625 Before 059654 007042 043384 TOTALS -. 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- Cor. After +l- TYPE SUP.. No. 7 TYPE PLUS No. / 1TPE Dll: No. 7 Meter Readings Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After 0:~4893 725 00534C 675 009743 625 Before 03498~ 0005335 ~i 009738 TOTALS 5 5 5' ' Calibr. Beg. +/- - 3 + 3 00 Cot. After +/- Product TYPE , TYPE . TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE . Stick Readings Inches Water Product TYPE. . TYPE. TYPE TYPE TYPE TYPE Stick Readings Inches Water e No. Type of Report: (Please circle onel Equipment Transfer, Product Transfer, Pump Test, Intercompany Data Form Repair, Station Audit, Station Opening, Station Sold, Product Changes. Station Closing. Location Name TEXACO Location No. 700 Date 6/17/92 Address City State Failure Reported P.O. AFE No. Service call made Time arrived am/pr, Marketing Rep. Rep. No. Time Comp. am/pn In addition to correcting the problem reported, please perform thc following: Repair Time Stick ali tanks with water finding paste. Read.all pump totalizecs. Travel Time Record data below including product type and pump no. where necessary. TYPE IIMI No. 8 TYPE qllP No. 8 TYPE pi IlK No. 8 Meter ReadDgs Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons I)~dars After 042049 625 037013 725 007471 675 Before 042044 037008 007466 TOTALS 5 5 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- - 1 - 1 , + 2 Cot. After +1- TYPE f'l T Iz No. 8 TYPE No. TYPE No. Meter Read;n~ Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons DolLars After 010498 625 Before 010493 TOTALS 5 Calibr. Beg. +/- 0 0 Cor. After +/- TYPE No. TYPE No. TYPE No. Meter Readings Galbns Dollars Gallons . Dollars Gallons Dollars After Before TOTALS Calibr. Beg. +l- Cot. After +/- TYPE No. TYPE No. TYPE No. Meter Readln~ Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars Gallons Dollars After Before - ~ - : _ '~' .:-- TOTALS Calibr. Beg. */ .... Cor. After +l- Product TYPE TYPE TYPE, TYPE ., TYPE TYPE Stick Readings Inches Water Product TYPE TYPE TYPE ... TYPE TYPE TYPE Stick Readings Inches Water SERVICE STATION CONSTRUCTION / PETRO TITE TANK & LINE TESTING P.O. BOX 3OO7 NO. HOLLYWOOD, CA, 91609 213-875-0830 / 818-768-2126 818-768-2127 / 818-768-2128 FAX JUNE 17, 1992 TEXACO R&M ATTN: FRED LONG RE: S/S 61058000700 TO INSURE THAT THIS FACILITY MEETS REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING REPAIRS OF INSPECTION. 1) FURNISHED AND INSTALLED (2) RED LINE LEAK DETECTORS. R.J. MYERS & SONS, INC. ALL REGULATORY WERE COMPLETED JACKET XLD AGENCIES AT TIME MECHANICAL RONALD J. MYERS VICE PRESIDENT RJM/TD CONT, LIC. #330631 (B-C61) SERVING THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SINCE 1967 ~ ~ ~ '- '- RECEIVED ._~IP.O. Box 80427 Associated Environmental Systems, Inc. ~ 0 4 ~ Bakersfield, CA 93380 .i HAT. MAT. Ol~.8°5) 393-2212 ~~R RES -- SYSTEM II ECISION TANK & LINE TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Invoice Address: Tank Location: TEXACO USA i0 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA ,.~.~IVERSAL CITY CA 91608 TEXACO STATION 3698 MING AVE BAKERSFIELD CAL!F I.D. Number: N/A Technician:BNL Tech.~:89165 Van~:6105 '-'~ 00 End: 23:30 County: KE Date: 11/15/9i Time Start: Facility Phone$~: 1-805-834.-2822 Groundwater Depth: N/A Blue Prints: N/A Contact: MGR Date;Time system was filled: 11/15/91 19;00 Tank Fill/Vent Product Type Of Vapor Tank Capacity Product Tank Vapor Lines Line Recovery Inches of Pump Tank Water/Tank Type Material 1 1OK REG PASS PASS PASS PR-2 0 0 TURB S W S Additional Information: SITE LOG TIME Set Up Equip: Bled P~oduct Lines: Bled Vapor Lines: Bled Vent lines: Bled Turbine: Bled Suction Pump: Risers Installed: 20:00 20:05 20:10 20:15 20:05 N/A N/A a) This~ system and method meets the criteria set forth in NFPA b) Any failure listed above may require further action, check with all regulatory 'agencies. ~-~ ~ ...... -=Copyrz gh~t---(~)~l~'89----~-ls-~-'AES, - inc. -~v :~'~-'.... ........ :~_~ ,~, ,. California O.T.T.L. Number : 11 Oe~tified Technician Signature . Date GSSOCIATEI) EL¢~,kUI,]I, ti~,~iAL .~,,TE~S TEXACO VENTS R E L -- TLS Si;e Lagou~ For': T E XACO 3698 M!)IG P,)UE ~.AKE RSF Z E L ]9 CAI. I F ? A,ssomiat ed Er~i ~- on,m ent a 1 8~t'ems. ~ AES{System II Pr. ecision leak Test Graph Invoice No.: 15736 Date: 11/15/91 Time : 20:48:43 Technician: BNL Tank: 1 Tank Diameter(in): 91 Volume(gal): 10000 Grade Level(in): 135 Product Level(in): 108 Water Level On Tank(in): 0 Specific Gravity: .75 Coefficient Of Expansion: 0.0006588 Calibration Value(mi): 500 Channel: Level Segment From: 1 To 225 Temp Segment From: 1 To 225 17 I' T Change In Calibration Zone = 18 Starting Temperature (F): 75. 677 Surface Area(sq. in): 166.8 Calibration Unit(gal/unit) = 0.00722 Head Pressure (col/in (Btm)): 81.0 Temp. Change (F/h) : 0. 193 Level volume(gph): i.24 Temp. volume(gph): 1.26 Net change(gph) : -0.02 '~.Resul~ ----> PASS Copyriglnt (c) 1989 by AES, Inc. Product Line(gph): .000 P/L ----> PASS Notes TEXACD~STATION , 3698 MING AvE FIRST AND SECOND HOURS. , BAKERSFIELD CALIF. ~ssociated Envi~-onmental Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 80427 Bakersfield, CA 93380 (805)-393-2212 I~voice N u m b e r ]__~?_ __~_~_'_~7. ....... HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST WORK SHEET 1,::o~ PRODUCT I START END START END ]'EST VOL. NO. I Ti~4E TiME VOL. (NL) VOL. (ML) DIFF. (Mi]) Divide the volume differential by the test time ( 15 minutes) and ~i~uitiply by 0.0158311, which will convert the volume differential f'ro~ millilite~s per minute to gallons pe'r hou~TM. ]'he conve~sion constant is found by :' (60 rain/hr)/(3790 mi/gal) = 0.01583il (min/hr) (gal/ml) The conve'rsion constant causes the milliliters and minutes to cancel out. · 3/15 m1 /min. X 0.0158311 ('min/hr) (gal/mi) = 0'003 gal'/h~::.~.'' '~' RESULTS OF THIS WORK SHEET TO,'BE. COMPILED ON REsuLTS SHEET. .. Associated Environmental Systems, Inc. LEAK AES DETECTOR RESULTS w/o# WIC# TECHNICIAN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX PRODUCT'TYPE TYPE OF LEAK DETECTOR TESTED(CIRCLE ONE) ~ PLD XLP OTHER SERIAL NUMBER: RESIDUAL VOLUME ~! 'mi. FULL OPERATING PRESSURE ~ FUNTIONAL ELEMENT HOLDING PRESSURE METERING TIME ~ sec. METERING PRESSURE ~ PSI. PSI. PSI. INDUCED LEAK RATE OF 3 GPH ~ 10 PSI USING RED JACKET FTA LEAK DETECTOR DID RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK LEAK DETECTOR DID NOT RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK REPLACED FAILED LEAK DETECTOR? (CIRCLE ONE) · FAlL YES' NO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxx TYPE OF NEW LEAK DETECTOR DLD PLD XLP OTHER SERIAL NUMBER OF NEW LEAK DETECTOR ,. ~EA~K DETECTOR DID RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK .LEAK DETECTOR DID NOT RECOGNIZE 3 GPH LEAK Headquarters · P.O. Box 80427, Bakersfield, CA 93380 * (805) 393-2212 · (800) 237-0067 '365.1'Pegasus Drive, Suite 102 · Bakersfield, CA 93308 · U.S, '(800) 426-2113 ~' PASS FAIL BAKER~FIEL~ FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION 2130 G Street,'Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY, ADDRESSj ! NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED / IS PIPING GOING TO'BE TESTED TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS TANK TESTING COMPANY NAME OF TESTER CERTIFICATION s~. ~.~s~o~ ~ ~J~//3/ ~ SIGN~UR~OF APPLICANT SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY. 19. WORK AUTHORIZED BY / This is to certify th~ork was satisfactorily c~151eted. · ~ Reta-iler'~'~ignature Date ,.lob Completed TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC. CONTRACTOR'S INVOICE DESCR, ,O. OF WORK DONE De~riplion of work Io bo done sub~l to lerms on reve~ side Description of Materials Used From the Contractor's Stock (Use Attach- tance of terms on reveme side her~f. ment if N~essa~.) MAT~RIA~ S Attach Vendor's Invoice Covering Material Purchased. RENTAL CO~ MARKUP ~AL U T MATERIAL/RENTAUSUB CONTRA~ TOTAL  RATE L NAME C~SIF. DATE TIME-AM/PM ~r '~OUeRS Total' PE*HOUR ~TAL A Arrival Depa~um R o R D *EXCLUDING MEAL BREAKS TOTAL LABOR OOST ~ileage (If appli~ble) ~ Miles ~ . ~ ¢ Per Mile =Total Mileage TOTAL ~ILEAGE T~BLE AMT. ~/-00 ~ ~ ~ ~TAL INVOICE f (we) certify that the above mentioned work was performed by me (us) in a workmanlike manner and charges are in accordance with terms agreed upon or with the Texaco Form S-240 "Hourly Rate Contract" which may be in effect and that I (we) certify that the above mentioned work was performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The undersigned shall maintain accurate records pertaining to all work performed hereunder and all transactions related thereto and agrees to retain all such records for not less than two years after completion of the work performed hereunder. The undersigned shall not pay any commissions, fees, or grant any rebates to any employe or officer of COMPANY nor favor employes or officers of COMPANY with gifts or entertainment of significant cost or value nor enter into any business arrangements with employes or officers of COMPANY, other than as a representative of COMPANY, without COMPANY'S written approval. Any representative or representatives authorized by COMPANY may audit any and all records of CONTRACTOR relative to the work performed hereunder and all transactions related thereto for the purpose of determining whether there has been compliance with this agreement. Contractor agrees to reimburse Company promptly for any payments made hereunder for labor performed on and/or materials furnished to any property other than that specifically set out in this agreement. VENDOR NO. CONTRACTOR'S NAME (Print or Type) ~¢,~(.J,~ ~'-~, {.,t_ i ~ /Y~'~;~ '~ . REDWiqNE .TESTING SERVIC P.O. BOX 1567 BAKERSFIELD CA 93302-1567 ~C RLW EQUIPMENT INC P.O. BOX 640 BAKERSFIELD CA 93302 HELIUM TEST REPORT LOCATION: TEXACO MING ~ REAL BAKERSFIELD CA TEST DATE: 8-27-91 TECHNICIAN: TOM LATKOVICH LICENSE: 92-1387 TANK TEST: TEN THOUSAND GALLON REGULAR LEADbD TEST PRESSURE: TEST TINE: RESULTS: 1.8 PSI ONE HOUR NO LOSS IN NET PRESSURE PRODUCT LINE TESI: TEN THOUSAND GALLON REGULAR LEADED TEST PRESSURE: TEST TIME: RESULTS: 15 PSI ONE HOUR NO LOSS IN NET PRESSURE .~~T~J~j ENGiNEERiNG & TESTING August 26, 1991 Fred Long Texaco Refining & Manufacturing, Inc. 10 Universal City Plaza, Fourth Floor Universal City, CA 91 608 Re: Tank Tightness Tests- Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 3698 Ming / Real, Bakersfield , CA Dear Fred, Precision tests were performed on underground storage tanks at the above location using the Tracer Tight® method for tank tightness testing. We have reviewed the data produced in conjunction with this test for purposes of verifying the results and certifying the tank system. The testing was performed in accordance with Tracer Tight® protocol, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a precision tank test. The results of testing are shown on the following certification page and indicate whether the tank and associated piping passed or failed. Included with the certification is a report consisting of laboratory analysis, condensed data sheet and a site map. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, President gJ Enclosures P.O. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 HORIZON ENGINEERING & TESTING CERTIFICATION RO. Box 8490 · Mesa, Arizona 85214 · (602) 926-3000 · (800) 229-2930 Contract No: 1175-91 Test Date: August 7, 1991 Customer: Texaco Refining & Manufactu.r!ng! linc. Attn: Fred Long 10 Universal City Plaza, Fourth Floor Universal City CA' "i~,i1608 Site: Contact: Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 Fred Long 3698 Ming / Real Bakersfield CA Tank N.o. Product Volume I Diesel 10,000 2 Unleaded 10,000 3 Regular 10,000 4 Premium 10,000 Water In Tank 0 0 0 0 Leak Tank Line Rate ((~ph) Only Test < .05 Pass Pass < .05 Pass Pass > .05 Fail Fail < .05 Pass Pass California Certified Tank Tester Palmore Currey III 94-1418. Tracer Research Corporation PREPARED FOR: Horizon Engineering and Testing 936 E. Javelina, Suite 1 Mesa, Arizona 85204 Tracer TightTM Test of 4 Underground Storage Tanks at the Texaco 61-058-0700 Bakersfield, California August 20, 1991 SUBMITI'ED BY: TRACER RESEARCH CORPORATION 010389a Tracer Research Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ................... 1 CLASSIFICATION OF LEAKAGE ..................................... 2 CERTIFICATION .................................................. 3 Results of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation ................................. 4 APPENDIX A: ANALYTICAL RESULTS ............................... 7 APPENDIX B: FIGURES ............................................ 8 Corporation INTRODUCTION Horizon Engineering and Testing and Tracer Research Corporation performed Tracer TightTM leak testing of 4 underground storage tanks at the Texaco 61-058-0700 site in Bakersfield, California. The tanks were inoculated with tracer July 24, 1991 to a concentration of approximately 10 ppm. Samples were collected on August 7, 1991. The following table shows the tank size, product it contained, and tracer that was used for testing in each tank: · TANK # PRODUCT SIZE (GAL) TRACER Tank 1 Diesel 10,000 DDM+ Tank 2 Unleaded 10,000 114B2 Tank 3 Regular 10,000 DDM + Tank 4 Premium 10,000 114B2 CONCEPT OF OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION The tracer leak detection method relies upon the addition of a highly volatile liquid chemical to the fuel. If a leak occurs in the underground fuel system, fuel is released into the surrounding soil. The tracer escapes from the fuel by vaporization and disperses into the soil by molecular diffusion. Various means are used to sample the soil vapors in the immediate vicinity of the underground tanks and pipes. In this case, sampling was performed by driving probes into the ground in the vicinity of the tanks and pipes. Each probe has an effective detection radius of approximately 10 to 12 feet. This means that a given probe should detect a leak anywhere within the area described by the 10 foot radius around the probe. The tracer must be placed in the tank at least two weeks prior to the probe sampling for this method to be effective. This process of leak detection by placing a liquid tracer in a liquid product followed by detection of the tracer underground in the vapor phase is protected under TRC patents. Total volatile petroleum hydrocarbons are measured to give additional information about the conditions at the site. In particular, the hydrocarbons provide information about the severity of the leakage, and the degree of environmental damage that may have Tracer Research Corporation occurred. The absence of tracer also gives double assurance that the tank system is not leaking. CLASSIFICATION OF LEAKAGE The classification of leakage is based on the concentration of tracer detected. The detection of hydrocarbons outside of the tank is used as supplemental information. PASS Criteria: Tracer less than 0.1 ug/L less than 1.0 ug/L but greater than 021 ug/L Depth below grade At five feet If concentration decreases with an increase in depth. FAlL Criteria: Tracer greater than or equal to 1.0 ug/L greater than or equal to 0.1 ug/L but less than 1.0 ug/L D,,e, pth below grade At any depth If concentration sustains or increases with an increase in depth. 2 Tracer Fl~s~rch Corpor~cion CERTIFICATION Location: Texaco 61-058-0700 3698 Ming/Real Bakersfield, California 010389a Date: August 20, 1991 TANK # PRODUCT SIZE (gal) TRACER LEAK STATUS Tank 1 Diesel ' 10,000 DDM+ Pass Tank 2 Unleaded 10,000 114B2 Pass Tank 3 Regular 10,000 DDM + Fail Tank 4 Premium 10,000 114B2 Pass Tracer Research Corporation certifies that the tank and pipe systems listed in the above table have been tested .by means of Tracer TightTM, which meets the criteria set forth in NFPA 329 for a "precision leak test. According to EPA standard test procedures for evaluating leak detection methods, this Tracer Tighta~ method is capable of detecting leaks of 0.05 gallons per hour with a Probability of Detection (PD) of 0.97 and Probability of False Alarm (PF^) of 0.029. Submitted by: Tracer ResearCh Corporation The following criteria are used for the classification of leakage when tracer is detected. PASS Criteria: Tracer less than 0.1 ug,/L , less than LO ug/L bur greater than 0.1 ug/L Criteria: Tracer greater than or equal to 1.0 ug/L greater than or equal £o 0.1 ug/L but less than 1.0 ug/L Depth below grade At five feet If concentration decreases with an increase in depth Depth below grade At any depth If concentration sustains or increases with an increase in depth. 3 Tracer Research Corporation Results of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation Nonvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Method This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method described below complies with the performance requirements of the federal underground storage tank reg,_ lation. T.he evaluation was conducted by the e,q~u!p~ent manufacturer or a consultant to tlae manufacturer according to the U.S. EPA s Standard Test Procedure for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: N-onvolumetric Tank Tightness Testing Methods." The full evaluation report also includes a form describing the method and a ffrm summarizing the test data. Tank owners using this leak detection system should keep this form on file to prove compliance with the federal regulations. Tank owners should check with State and local agencies to make sure this form satisfies their requirements. Method Description Name: Tracer Research Corporation Vendor: Tracer Research Corporation 3855 North Business Center Drive (street address) Tucson Arizona 85705 (602) 888-9400 (city) (state) (zip) Evaluation Results This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when a threshold amount of Tracer chemical is detected as a vapor in the soil outside the tank has an estimated probability of false al~rin~ [P(FA)]'of 2.9' % based 'on the test results of 1 false alarms out of 34 tests. A 95 % confidence int~al for P(FA) is from 0 to 8.5 ~. The corresponding probab!lity of detection [P(D)] of ~a 0.005 gallon per hour leak is 97.1 % based on the test results of 33 detections out ot ...3..4 siinulatei:l leak tests. A 95°~ confidence interval for P(D) is from 91,5 to 100 %. Does this method use additional modes of leak detection? [ ] Yes IX] No If Yes, complete additional evaluation results on page 3 of this form. Based on the results above, and onpage 3 if applicable, this method [X] does [] does not meet the federal performance standards esta6hshed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.10 gallon per hour at P(D) of 95% and P(FA) of 5%). Test Conditions During Evaluation The evaluation testing was conducted in a varying size gallon tX] steel tX] fiberglass tank that was inches in diameter and inches long, installed in backfill. The ground-water level was varying inches above the bottom of the tank. Nonvolumet~ Trl' Me~od - ~ Foma 4 Tracer Raa~arch Corporation Nonvolumetric TIT Method Tracer Tight (TM) Version Test Conditions During Evaluation (continued) The tests were conducted with the tank varying percent full. The temperature difference between product added to fill the tank and product already in the tank ranged from N/A °F to N'/A °F, with a standard deviation of N/A °F. The product used in the evaluation was varying gasoline,, diesel, jet fuel and heating oil.. This method may be affected by other sources of interference. List these interferences below and give the ranges of conditions under which the evaluation was done. (Check None if not applicable.) [ ] None Interferences Range of Test Conditions Limitations on the Results * The performance has not been substantially changed. * The vendor's instructions for using the method are followed. * The tank contains a product identified on the method description form. * The tank capacity is~ gallons or smaller. * The difference between a3ded and in-tank product temperatures is no greater than + or - degrees Fahrenheit. [ ] Check if applicable: Temperature is not a factor because Tracer detection outside of tank does not dep..e, nd on ffiel temperature inside tank. Temperature does not affect the amount of T~acer released. * The waiting time between the end of filling the test tank and the start of the test data collection is at least hours. * The waiting time between the end of "topping of~' to final testing level and the start of the test data collection is at least <x hours. * The total data collection time for the test is at least hours. * ~The product volume in the tank during testing is 0-100 .% full. *'rnis method [ ] can [ ] cannot be used if the ground-water level is above the bottom of the tank. Other limitations specified by the vendor or determined during testing: 1. After Trac. er chemical is added, you must wait at least 14 days to collect samples from vapor probes.' 2. Alternati{,e 'aPProaches mu'st be used if'top of tank is unaer water. Tl~ese al~proaches are available through Tracer Research Corp. Nonvolum~ri~lWrMethod-Rc~fl~Form Tracer Research Corporation Nonvolumetric TIT Method Version Tracer Tight (TM) > Safety Disclaimer: This test procedure only addresses the issue of the method's ability to detect leaks. It does not test the equipment for safety hazards. Additional Evaluation Results (if applicable) This method, which declares a tank to be leaking when . h. as an estimated probability of false alarms [P(FA)] of. % based on tl~e test results of ~ false alarms out of tests. Note: 'A perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Ba~'~ff on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(FA) is from 0 to %. The corresponding probability of detection [P(D)] of a gallon per hour leak is % based on the test results of detections out of simulated leak tests. Note: A perfect score during testing does not mean that the method is perfect. Based on the observed results, a 95% confidence interval for P(D) is from 0 to %. > Water detection mode (if applicable) Using a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum water level that the water sensor can detect with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. dUsing a false alarm rate of 5%, the minimum change in water level that the water sensor can etect with a 95% probability of detection is N/A inches. Based on the minimum water level and change in water level that the water sensor can detect with a false alarm rate of 5% and a 95%probability of detection, the minimum time for the system to detect an increase in water leyel at an incursion rate of 0.10 gallon per hour is N/A minutes in a .N/A - gallon tanlc. Certification of Results I certi.fy that the nonvolumetric tank tightness testing method was installed and operated accord)ng to the vendor's instruction. ] also certify that the evaluation was performed according' to the standard EPA test procedure to nonvolumetric tank tightness testing methods and that the results presented above are those obtained during the evaluation. H. Kendall Wilcox (printed name) (signature) Ken Wilcox Associates (organization performing evaluation) Blue Springs, Missouri 64015 (city, state, zip) ' October 4, 1990 (816) 229-0860 (date) ~(phor/e number) o[3 6 Tracer Corporation APPENDIX A: ANALYTICAL RESULTS 7 Horizon/Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 3698 Ming, Bakersfield, CA 010389a £ £ £ £ 8/19/91 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound Pa9e Concentration 004-9 114B2 .1812 004-9 BCF .0120 004-9 DDM+ .8757 004-9 TVHC 53.7920 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in ug/L 0.0000 = Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0005) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) Horizon/Texaco 3698 Ming/Real, 010389 Site No. 61-058-0700 Bakersfield, CA. 8114/91 Location 001-5 001-5 001-5 001-5 CONDENSED DATA Compound 114B2 BCF DDM TVHC Page Concentration .0123 0.0000 .0165 .2260 002-5 002-5 002-5 002-5 114B2 BCF DDN TVHC .0080 0.0000 .0124 .6530 003-5 003-5 003-5 003-5 114B2 BCF DDH TVHC .O083 0o0000 .0268 0.0000 004-5 004-5 004-5 004-5 114B2 BCF DDM TVHC 0.0000 .0022 .4268 12.6330 005-5 005-5 005-5 005-5 114B2 BCF DDM TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .3700 0O6-5 006-5 OO6-5 006-5 114B2 BCF DDM TVHC .0156 0.0000 0.0000 6.2060 007-5 007-5 007-5 007-5 114B2 BCF DDM TVHC .0225 0.0000 0.0000 1.7790 TVHC in mg/L, Tracers in ug/L 0.0000 : Not detected Detection -99999999999 = No sample Limits: Tracer (0.0005) TVHC (0.05) Horizon/Texaco Site No. 61-058-0700 3698 Ming/Real, Bakersfield, CA. 010389 8/14/91 CONDENSED DATA Location Compound 8,9,10,11 114B2 8,9,10,11 BCF 8,9,10,11 DDM 8,9,10,11 TVHC Pa9e Concentration 0.0000 0o0000 0.0000 0.0000 BLANK01 114B2 BLANK01 BCF BLANK01 DDM BLANK01 TVHC 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 TVHC in mg/t, Tracers in ug/L 0.0000 =.Not detected Detection Limits: Tracer (0.0005) -99999999999 = No sample TVHC (0.05) Tracer Reaerch Corporation APPENDIX B: FIGURES EXPLANATION · 1 Sampling Probe Location ....... Approximate Pipeline Location BUILDING 1 0 5 10 f e e t TEXACO 63.-058-0700 3698 MING REAL BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA [ SAMPLING L0 CATION$ I Pigure 1 o Tank 1 0 0 10,000 gal Diesel DDM+ O Fill .9 Tank 2 O O 10,000 gal Unleaded 114B2 O Fill '8 Tank 0 0 10,000 gal Regular DDM+ O Fill 11. 10' Tank 4 0 0 .1 10,000 gal Premium 1 14B2 O Fill 010389a TEST DELAY / CANCELLATION RECORD WORK ORDER .t.t, ._Z~.?~,._t.,} ?~"-(~ TIME SCHEDULED~'70© CERT f~ '>'~ ?-/o?/ VAN ~ 0___~~ REASON FOR DELAY: DELAY TOTAL HRS DELAY 3- //~'-' L~ATE FUEL DELIVERY. ~ TIME DELIVERED_?~.~.7~O OTHER ~7~/9" 7" 7"o,¢ 10-t879 7700 /~.,/~t '1700 /900 I ACKNOWLEDGE THE ABOVE TEST WAS DELAYED FOR REASONS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF AES OR THE AES FIELD TECHNICIAN. ACKNOWLEDGED BY:_~ ~ CANCELLATION REASON CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED BY: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ONLY FOR 'THE F'URF'OSE OF AES TRACKING OF THE TECHNICIANS TIME. Associated Environmental Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 80427 Baker's'fi eld, CA (805) 393-22i2 AES -- SYSTEM II PRECISION TANK & LINE TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Invoice Address: TEXACO USA. 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608 Tank Location: TEXACO. 3698 MING AVE. BAKERSFIELD, CA. W.O.~: 13056 I.D. Number: 0700 Technician:RLP Tech.~:89154 Van~:Oll5 Date: 10/31/90 Time Start: 19:0~ End: 04:00 County: KE ~acility P~hone~$: 805-834-2722 Groundwater Depth: 15+ Blue Prints: N/A ~ontact: RENY MENIS. Date;Time system was filled: 10/31/90-23:00 Tank Fill/Vent Tank Capacity~ Product Tank Vapor Lines Product Type Of Vapor Line Recovery Inches of Pump Tank Water/Tank Type Mate~ia 1 1OK S/UL PASS PASS PASS PH-2 NONE TURB SWS 8 1OK REG PASS PASS PASS PH-2 NONE TURB SWS ~ 1OK R/UL PASS PASS PASS PH-2 NONE TURB SWS 4 1OK DSL PASS PASS PASS PH-2 NONE TURB SWS Additional Information: SITE LOG TI~E Set Up Equip: Bled Product Lines: Bled Vapor Lines: Bled Vent lines: Bled Turbine: Bled Suction Pump: Risers Installed:~ ':' ?: 0 0 ,z.J: 1 0 N/A {'.JO a) This system and method meets the criteria set forth in NFPA b) Any failure listed above may require further action, check with all regulatory agencies. Copyright (c) 1989 by AES, Inc. California O.T.T.L. Number : :-):l...-.{.IZrTi~_,....~.// Certified Technician Signaturo :~~:~ .~, Dat~ RSSOCTRTE9 ENVIRONMENTI~L S?STEHS TEXACO, 118788, VENTS ';)_JL_~_ DSL R/UL tOK I,?/ REG S/UL tBK As ~- cc i at ed JZn v i ~on ment a lJJiSy st e m s, AES/System II Precision leak Test Graph Invoice No. : i4~6 Date: Technician: RLP Tank: Volume (gal): '1000e, Grade Water Level On Tank(in): 0 Specific Gravity: 0.75 Calibration Value(mi): iJ..q,Z~ Level Segment From: 1 To 225 !0/31/9~D Time : 23:28:~Z~i 1 TanN Diamete~-(in): 91 Level (in): IJ~7 Product Level.(in): 140 Coefficient Of Expansion: 0.0006551 Channel: t Temp Segment From: I To 225 L IE E L T !:1 E M p Change In Oalibration Zone = 65 Calibration Unit(gal/unit) = 0.00456 Starting Temperature (F): ,=1 ,908 Head Pressure(col/in (Btm)) 105.0 Surface Area(sq. in): 1~Z~5.3 Temp. Change(F/h) : 0. 102 Level volume(gph): 0.68 Temp. volume(gph): 0.67 Net change(gph) : 0.01 R ~ s ut ::]. -I~ ~ > Copyright (c) 1989 by AES, Inc. ** Notes ** TEXACO :~ 0'7~7J0. 3698 MING AVE. , BJqKERSFIELD, CA. ]'HIS IS A HIGH LEVEL. TEST WI'TH A 6X-CAI_. Product Line(gph): .005 AES/System II Precision leak Test Graph Invoice No. : 13056A Date: Technician: RLP Tank: Volume (gal): i000,Z, Grade Water Level On Tank(in): 0 Specific Gravity: ~alibration Value(mi): li40 Level Segment From: 1 To 235 Level (in): 135 .Coefficient Of Channel: 2 Temp Segment From: Time : ~0:51:57 Tank Diameter(in): 91 Product Leve~l'(in): 132 Expansion: 0. 0006535 /+0 To 225 T E 0hange In Calibration Zone = i9 Calibration Unit(gal/,-mit) = 0.01560 ~Starting Temperature (F): 84. 012 Head Pressure (col/in (Btm)): 99.0 Surface Area(sq. in): 360. 4 Temp. Change(F/h) : 0. 081 Level volume (gph): 0:53 Temp. volume(gph): 0.52 Product Line(gph): .004 Net change(gph) : 0.01 '. R~_- s ~l 1 t ---- > P'ASS P/L ----> F--'ASS Copy~?ight (c) 1989 by AES, Inc. Not es ** TEXACO ~$0700~ 3698 MING AVE. , BAKERSF'IELD~ CA. THIS IS A HIGH L_EVEL TEST WI-FH A AES/System II Precision leak Test Graph 11/01/~0 Level(in): 134 Invoice No.: !3056A Date: Technician: RLP Tank: Volume(gal): 10000 Grade Water Level On Tank(in>: 0 Specific Gravity: 0.75 Calibration Value(mi): l!40 Level Segment From: 1 To 250 yst ems, Time : 00:51:57 Tank Diameter(in): 91 Product Level (in)~ 1~'-'~.- Coefficient Of Expansion: 0.0006535 Channel: 3 Temp Segment Prom: 1 To 225 L E V E L T E M P ,,I Change In Calibration Zone = 33 Calibration ~Jnit(gal/unit) m 0.00898 Stawting Temperature (F): S4 · ~+,~,=. Head Pressure (col/in (Btm)): 99.0 ~urface Area(sq. in): 2~Z, 7.5 Temp. Change(F/h) : 0. 125 Level volume(gph): 0.82 Temp. volume(gph): 0.81 Net change(gph) : 0.01 Re s ul'~ ----> PA~S Copyright (c) 1989 by AES, Inc· Notes TEXACO ~$0700~ ~698 MING AVE. , BAKERSFIELD, ~"- ..... I,-! I Tl-~ TIHIS IS A Nil'SM LEVEL. ~:.~ 6, X-CF-H .... Product 'Line(gph): .006 I=, / L ---- > I=,AS~B ~-~ss ooi~t ed Env :L ~-on ment ~m 1 y?~t ems, AEC/System II P~ecisi0n leak Test G~aph Invoice No. : 13056B Date: !i/C~1/9~D Time : 02:12:59 Technician: RL.P Tank: 4 Tank Diameter(in): 9i Volume(gal): 10000 Grade Level (in): 135 Product Level(in): 131. Water Level On Tank(in): 0 Specifi~ Gravity: ~. B5 Coe'~'~icien~ Of Expansion: 0. 000454~ Calib~-ati0n Value(mi): 76~7 Channel: 1 ~evel Segment ~-om: 75 To 240 Temp Segment ~-om: 1 To 200 U L T E M p ::!!il ~hange In Calibration Zone = 46 Calibration Unit(gal/unit) = 0.00430 Starting Temperature (F): 91.0i6 Head Pressure(col/in (Btm)): 111.3 Surface Area~(sq. in): 87.6 Temp. Change(F/h) : 0.049, Level ~olume(gph): 0. 19 Temp. volume(gph): 0.22 Net change(gph) : -0.03 R e s ~ 1 t ---- > Copyright (c) 1989 by AES, Inc. ** Notes ** TEXACO $~0700. 3698 MING AVE , ~P, ER=.FIEL. I}, C:A. THIS IS A HIGH LEVEL. 'TE,'-.'ST [4I"FH A Product Line(gph): .002 F":-7"-?-'-' . _,o, ,"~'l~, INC. -., ....... U,....i ATF. D ENV I ROI'.lhlE?,iTAL q ..... "~'~- c:, A. BOX ~'~g ~":"~ BAKERSFIE~LD~ CA 93380 ~805) 393-2212 ~: .~..,,., ~.:, :,. ~:::. ~. ,...,,..,,,, ?:, ~,.../~ o~ ~ TEST PRODUCT START I El'dO S ]- A i;'."l" i END TEST VOl_. NO. Ti~E:i i 'I'IP!E VOL. (~,!I) ! VOL.. (mt) DIFF. (~1) I I 1 I I I Divide the volume differential by the test time (15 minutes) and multiple by 0.015831!. whi.~c:!",, will conve'r~t tP,,,~ volume differential f~'om millilite~s pe~~ minute to gallons pe~~ hour. The conversio'n con.stant is found by: (60 min/ht-)/(3790 mi/gal.) = 0.0158311 (min/ht-) (gal/mi) The conversion cons't.ant causes the :~i].].i!iters and minutes to cancel out. Ex. If the level dropped 3ml in 15 minutes then: 3/15 ml. /min. ~ 0. 01583~ ! <m:i.n/hr.) ,:gal/ml ) :A 0. 003 , E=.,T DATA I_EAK DETECTOR 'r ,"' TEST LOCATION: PRODUCT REG R/UL S/UL DSL DOES LEAK DET EXIST YES ~ NO YES ...... J ........... NO Y~S J NO TEST #1 I TEST :~2 RESULTS I I Sr-'r~aL ,~Bp/ffl r-,ASS ;2 ./~/¢X~--GAL i 2~~Al.. FAIL '" FAIL I SE R l I pass J FAIL.. RESULTS P/L TEST PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS j ' FAll_ NOTES: TEST PROCEDURE Test ell: perfo~-m fo'r 30 seconds with nozzle in full ope~ position test ~;:_': perfo~-m :F-or 30 seconds a'l"tc-'r' nozzle closed for 10.seconds EXAMPLE OF FOSSI.,..,LE RESULTS Test -~¢1 Test 4:~.2 Res,..tlts. TF:,::.t :bl Test :I:12 IResults 1 Gal 3 Ga! Pa. ss 3 Gat 3 Ga 1 Fai 1 'FECHN I C I'AIq 'FACILITY: ADDRESS : PERMIT #: FILE CONTEMPTS SUMMARY SENSITIVITY: Activity Date # Of Tanks Comments AnalyCiosl ~ Comsultincj Seevioes_ ~ Wegener Construction 1710 Calloway Bakersfield, CA 93312 T ahorat¢ Date Received: Date Reported: 3-13-89 3-14-89 Attention: Jerry Hale Sample: Soil Sample Description: Texaco Gas Station, Corner of Ming Ave. and Real Rd. Sampled by Mike Graham on 3-13-89 Method: Petroleum Hydrocarbons California DOHS LUF~ Manual Date Analyzed: 3-13-89 Ethyl Benzene Toluene Xylenes Benzene ID ~ Description p~_/g u~/q ~q/q u~/~ 18320-1 #1-A @ 2 ' <0.1 0.8 3,. 3 1.2 18320-2 #I-B @ 6' <0.1 1.3 7.3 3.9 18320-3 #2-A @ 2' 4.7 17 19 3.3 18320-4 #2-B @ 6' 0.4 4.0 6.5 2.2 18320-5 #3-A @ 2' ,' 0.8 6.0 68 5.6 18320-6 #3-B @ 6' <0.1 0.3 4.2 2.5 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasolin 18320-1 52. 18320-2 105 18320-3 613 18320-4 90 18320-5 780 State Contractors ~ 1710 Calloway Ucense No. 413913 Bak(~rsfield,CA 93312 WEGENER CONSTRUCTION DOUG WEGENER .5,~ ~-;~'~JOHN ROBINSON Owner Foreman 18320-6 63 Chief Chemist 4309 Armour Avenue [S05) 3S)5-053~ Bakersfield, 0~lifornia 93308 F~X (~05) 3~5-~0S~ Facility Name Permit No. TANK # L ~ .~.~ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TANK) 'Fd~-~AC~'SECTION, Ctl-~ XLL APPRO--'~A~-~' BO-'~ Ho 1. Tank is: []Vaulted [] Non-Vaulted [] Double-Wall {'] Single-Wall 2. Tank Material Carbon Steel r] stainless Steel [-] Polyvinyl Chloride f'] Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluminum [] Bronze r]Unknown [] Other {describe): 3. Primary Containment ,Date Installed Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer 4. Tank Secondary Containment [] Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner r] L'ined Vault [] None [] Unknown : [] Other {describe): Manufacturer: Material Thickness {Inches) Capacity (Gals.) §.?ank Interior LlninE ['l Rubber [] Alkyd []-]Epoxy {'lPhenollc ~l Olass [~ Clay [] Unlined [] Unknown ~] Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection []~ Oalvanlzed [] Fiberglass-Clad [] Polyethylene Wrap [] Vinyl Wrapping [] Tar or Asphalt O Unknown [] None [-] Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: [~] None [] Impressed Current System [] Sacrificial Anode System ~] Describe System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, aqd {nterceptipn a. Tank: [] Visual {vaulted tanks only) [] Groundwater Monitoring Well(s) [] Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) [] U-Tube Without Liner [] U-Tube with Compatible Liner Directing Flow To Monitoring Wellis)* [] Vapor Detector *[] Liquid Level Sensor* [] Conductivity Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor In Annular Space Of Double Wall Tank'* [] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well Or Annular Space [] Dally Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation O Periodic Tightness Testing [] None [] Unknown [] Other b. Piping: [] Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) For Pressurized Piping* ~lMonttorlng Sump With Raceway [] Sealed Concrete Raceway [] Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner Raceway [] None []Unknown ['l Other *Describe Make & Model:. 8. Tan~ Tightness Has This Tank Been Tightness Tested? ~] Yes [] No ~] Unknown Date Of Last Tightness Test Results Of Test Test Name Testing Company 9. Tank Repair Tank Repaired? []Yes [] No []Unknown Date(s) Of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection ~ Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level [] Tape Float Gauge [] Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut-Off Controls [] Capacitance Sensor [] Sealed Fill Box [] None []'Unknown [] Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices il. Plpln~ ~/Yes [] No l-{ Unknown Materlal a. Underground Piping: Thickness (inches) Diameter ~dY- Manufacturer ~ Pressure [] Suction [] Gravity - Approximate Length Of Pipe Run ~'~-- b. UNderground Piping Corrosion Protection: [] Oalvanized [] Fiberglass-Clad ~] Impressed Current [] Sacrificial Anode [~ Polyethylene Wrap []Electrical Isolation {'l Vinyl Wrap {-]Tar or Asphalt [] Unknown ~None /'l Other (describe): c. UndergrC3iid Piping, Secondary Containment: ~ Double-Wall [] Synthetic Li~er Sy§tem [] None [] Unknown 'r~ Other. (describe): ~,~-C .~,9~~ ~,'~Y.~ KERN COUN~ Env~o~en~He~Oepar~menc PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY PERMIT NUMBER 280009B FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: Texaco 3698 Ming Avenue Bakersfield, CA Texaco inc. 10 Universal Plaza Universal City, CA 91602 Ph. # Wegener Construction 4204 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, CA. Ph. # X NEW BUSINESS CHANGE OWNERSHIP RENEWAL MODIFICATION OTHER PERMIT EXPIRES APPROVAL DATE APPROVED BY License #413913~ FEBRUARY 16, i990 FEBRU.A~Y 15, 1989 "/ Joe Canas ................................ POST ON PREMISES ........................... CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: Standard Instructions This permit applies only to the modification of an existing facility involving the extension of two islands and repiping for new diesel producl. All construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. All equipment and materials in this construction must be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with 48-hour advance notice. Backfill material for piping and 'tanks to be as per 'manufacturers' specifications. OeJano · L.amon.~ · L~ke Isaoelta · Molave · Ricmecre$! · Shatter · Taft PERMIT TO OONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY PERMIT NUMBER 280009B ADDENDUM Fioa~ vent valves are recuired on vent/vapor lines of underground tanks to prevent overfiliings. Construction inspection record card is included with permit given to Permittee. This card must be posted at .jobsite prior to initial inspection. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority and arrange for each group of required inspections numbered as per instruction on card. Generally, inspections will be made of: Piping system with secondary containment leak interception/raceway. Overfill protection and leak detection/monitoring. Any other inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority. Ail underground metal connections (e.g. piping, fitting, fill pipes) to tank(s) must be electrically isolated, and wrapped to a minimum 20 mil thickness with corrosion-preventive, gasoline-resistant tape or otherwise protected from corrosion. No produc~ sna~ oe stored in tank(s) until approval is granted by the Permizting 'Authority. I0. Monitoring requiremeh~s for this facility will be described on fina~ "PermiZ to OoeraZe." DATE JC:cas 8aKersfieid, CA 93301 (8Q5~ 86~-~636 K~-RN COUNT' Env~'on~enr.~ Ite~',~ Deparr..~ent PERMIT TO cONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY PERMIT NUMBER 28000gB FACILITY NAME/ADDRESS: OWNER(S) NAME/ADDRESS: GONTRAGTOR: Texaco 3698 Ming Avenue Bakersfield, CA Texaco Inc. 10 Universal Plaza Universal City, CA 91603 Ph. # Wegene'r Construction 4204 Armour Avenue Bakersfield, CA. Ph. # X NEW BUSINESS CHANGE OWNERSHIP RENEWAL MODIFICATION OTHER PERMIT EXPIRES APPROVAL DATE APPROVED BY License #413913 FEBRUARY 16~ 1990 FEBRUARY 16, 1989 Joe Canas ................................ POST ON PREMISES ........................... coNDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: Standard Instructions This permit applies only to the modification of an existing facility involving the extension of two islands and repiping for new diesel product. All construction to be as per facility plans approved by this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. Ail equipment and materials in this construction must be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with 48-hour advance notice. Backfill material for piping and tanks to be as per manufacturers' specifications. ~lST~IC'T OFFICES Oelano * Lamont s Lake," ,lla · Molave · Riclgecresf · Shatter · Taft' PERMIT TO GONSTRUGT UNDERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY PERMIT NUMBER 280009B ADDENDUM Float vent valves are required on vent/vapor lines of underground tanks to prevent overfiliings. Construction inspection record card is included with permit given to Permittee. This card must be posted at 3obsite prior to initial inspection. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority and arrange for each group of required .inspections numbered as per instruction on card. Generally, inspections will be made of: Piping system with secondary containment leak interception/raceway· Overfill protection and leak detection/monitoring. Any othe~ inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority. Ail underground metal connections (e.g. piping, fitting, fill pipes) to tank(s) must be electrically isolated, and wrapped to a minimum 20 mil thickness with corrosion-preventive, gasoline-resistant tape or otherwise protected from corrosion· No product shall be stored in tank(s) until approval is granted by the Permitting Authority. 10. Monitoring requirements for this facility will be described on final ACCEPTED BY "Permit to Ooerate." JC:cas DATE FILE CONTENTS INVENTORY Facility Permit to Abandon # of Tanks Permit to Construct Permit to Operate · .Application to Abandon . Tank(s} · ,, to Construct : Tan~Sheets Application to Operate Amended Permit Conditions Annual Report Forms Da{e Date Date Date /--:- ,.f? Plot Plans Copy of Written Contract Between Owner & Operator Inspection Reports Correspondence - Received Date Date Date Date Date Correspondence Mailed Date Date Date Date Date Unauthorized Release Reports Abandonment/Closure Reports Sampling/Lab Reports MVF Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) STD Compliance Check (New Construction Checklist) MVF Plan Check (New Construction) STD Plan Check (New Construction) MVF Plan Check (Existing Facility) STD Plan Check (Existing Facility) "Incomplete Application" Form Permit Application Checklist Permit Instructions . Discarded Tightness Test Results Date Date Date Monitoring Well Construction Data/Permits Environmental Sensitivity Data: Groundwater Drilling, Boring Logs Location of Water Wells Statement of Underground Conduits Plot Plan Featuring AIl Environmentally Sensitive Data Photos Construction Drawings Location: Miscellaneous Kern County Ilealth Departmeat DJvJsJon or Environmenta! Ilea]th 1700 Flower Street. Bakersfield. CA (805) 86t-3636 93305 Pnrmil No. AppJication Dale AI'I'LICA'I'ION FUR PI'~RIqlT TO OPERATE UNUERGROUNI) IIAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILII'Y t.~New Facility ~HodificatJon Of Facility ~Exi~tJ~mt~ Facility ~'lransfer uf Ownersl, ip Emergency 24 Bout Contact {name area code phone): Days ~.~e~<'~:~ Facility. Name .~)/~ff~ No. Of Tanks T~pn Of Business (check}: ~asoline Station ~Oth(,r ldcscribe} Is Tank{s) Located On An Agricultural Farm? ~Yes Facility Address ~g~ ~,~a ~e Nearest Cross St. T R SEC ~ (Rural Locations Only) own e r _~?,~ r~ Operator WaLer To Facility Provided By Soil Characteristics AL'Fac~]JLy Basis ~o~ Soil Type and Groundwater DepLh DeLermJnaLions Address ~ ~~ Proposed Startin~ DaLe Worker's Compensation Cer~f~ation No. Contact Person ~,~'~ t~/~t~ ? Telephone ConLact Person Telephone Depth to Groundwater CA Contractor's License No, z~7//$~/~ Zip Telephone Proposed Completion Date ~/<-' Insurer D. if This Permit Is For Modi fiq~tion Of An Exist i~g Facility, Briefly Modifications Proposed /(fl/~¢~ ff~'/y,~'~ c~ ~W'-~U~,~/,/~ "~~4~'~.;-- E. Tank(s} Store (check all that apply}: Tank t Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded ~u'lar Premium Diesel Describe Was te F ' '~" 4204 A~mour Ave: Bakersfield, CA 9330b tare C;ontmctor$ S se No 413913 Licen ' Ils Stored {not necessary for motor vehicle fuels) clal nameI CAS # (if known) Chemical Previously Stored (if different) R const superintenu DoL)G wEGENER ' Previous Owner owner accept fully all obligations of Permit No. issued to I understand that the Permitting Authority may revie~ and modify or terminate the transfer .,f the Permit to Operate this underground storage facility upon receiving this comple, d form. This form has been completed: under pony a~nd correct. ./ ,'/ .." of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true 1700 Flower Street Bakerstle;d, California 93305 Telephone (805) 861 °3636 KERN COUNT-Y HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION HEALTH OFFICER Leon M Hebertson, M.D. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Vernon S. Relchard July 2, 1986 Texaco P.O. Box 3756 Los Angeles, Ca 90051 Dear Sir/Madam: This is to advise you that this department has reviewed the project results for the subsurface contamination investigations conducted at the following facilities: 5300 Olive Dr., Bakersfield, Ca. 3698 Ming Ave., Bakersfield, Ca. Based upon the findings described in the report, this department is satisfied that no significant soil contamination resulting from leakage of the tank exists at the site. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Nancy B. Johannesmeyer Environmental Health Specialist II Hazardous Materials Management Program NBJ:dk DISTRICT OFFICES PETIIOLEUN K. E. Curtis Construction 1400 Old ConeJo Road Newbury Park, California LABORATORI J. J. EGLIN, REG. CHEM. ENGR. INC. MAIN OFFICE: 4100 PIERCE ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93308 PHONE 327-4911 91320 Date Reported: Date Received: Laboratory No.: 9/19/85 9/17/85 16153 Sample Description: Soil sample approximately 6" under waste oil tank Texaco Station Ming & Real Road Constituents Total Hydrocarbons, ppm (Gravimetric freon extraction): Total Lead, mg/kg: e (,)1.oo (-)_ refers to "less than" B C LA~ORAI~ORIES~. INC. jo ~jo E~l~l~n ~- ...... ty Name and ?.an.-..e.v" a Texaco 3698 Ming A~za, 1 tank(s)'at above location Division of Env[roam~,~ntal lVO0 Flo~er Street, Bakersfteht, CA APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CLOSURE/ABANDOnmenT OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Bo Do T_ype~ o__f A__pplication (Fill Out One Application Per Facility) []Temporary .Closure/Abandonmen--~ [2] Permanent Closure/Abandonment Project Contact (name, area code, phone): Days 2/3- ?B~-~cz/ Nights Facility Name q-~W-~- c ~ Facility Address -~ ~.~d,_ Nearest Cross St. T R SEC (Rdral ~]ocafions Only) Owner .'F ? ~ ~ ~ ~ Telephone Address ~.~, __~=7~~ f_~ ~/~_~--~ ~ Zip . Opera tot Telephone Address Zip Water to Facility Provided by Soil Characteristics at Facility Basis for Soil Type and Ground~ter Depth Determinations Depth to Groundwater Tank Removal Contractor ~ ~_ d--~.~-7-~ ~ ¢~,~%;- CA License No. Address ~ ~t.~ ~~ ~~~Zip ~t~ Telephone Pro~s~ Starti~ Date ~- ~ --~ ~- Pro~s~ C~pletion Date Worker' s C~nsation Certific~ti'on )m~=/~ ~-7~ ~4 Insurer Environmental Assessment Contractor Address Proposed Starting Date Worker s Compensation Cer'tification CA License No. Zip Telephone Proposed Completion Date Insurer Chemical Composition of Materials Stored Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) Dates Stored Chemical Previously Stored (if different) to E. Describe Method for Retrieving Samples Samples Will be Analyzed for D//,~' ~J¢ ~Ww-~W-Z~ / /~.~ Laboratory That Will Perform Analyses of Samples Address Telephone F. This application for: ~?emoval or [[]abandonment in place * * PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET BEFORE SUBMIT?lNG' ~PPLICATION FOR REVIEW. This form []as been completed under penalty of. perjury an~ to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. Provide Descripuion 5ica[ L'ayout of F:~cility UJ~', ~vace Pro~ided Below; Include All the Following [nfocmacion: Location of Tank(s), piping & Dispenser(s) Proposed S~npli~lg Locations Indicating Approxiiaate Depth of Samples Nearest Street or Intersection Any Water Wells or Surface Waters Within 100' Radius of Facility NORTH Approved By Sc~!e Kern County Health Depar5ment~ Division ot Enui~onmental Heaw 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfielu~ CA 93305 Permit No. Application APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type of Application (check): [~N~ Facility ~odification of Facility [-~Existing Facility []Transfer of Ownership A. flmergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days .. F~.~- e'~f- Nights Facility Name T~'~;~- c.~ jZ._~-~6~/3 No. of Tanks Type of Business (check): ~a~line Station ~Other (describe) .. Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? ~]Yes ~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily for Agricultural Purposes? [~Yes ~ Facility Address 7&~$ ~ l~f~ Nearest Cross St. T R SEC (Rural'. 'Locations 0nly) Owner 7--~-~. ~ ~ ~ Address ~_~,.~ 'z ?~-~ Operator Address B. Water to Facility Provided. by Soil Characteristics at Facility zip Contact Person ~'~. (¢~ ~.~ ~ fo~,.~'~,' Telephone ~,~ -_ 7~- F{- ~- Contact Person Telephone ,,. Depth to' Groundwater Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Determinations Ce Contractor [~_ ~ ~--..k $ ~ ~-r ' CA Contractor' s License No Address · ~,~ ~ c~...,',~r't, Zip ~ Proposed Starting Date ?--.rd.. Proposed C~pletion Worker's Compensation Certification ~ ~-~ FJ-7~ 9'$ Insurer D. If This ~ermit Is For' Modification Of An Existing Facility, Briefly D~scribe Modifications E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ! Waste Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded ~uel ' [] [] .El [] Regular Premium Diesel Waste Chemical Composition of Materials Stored (not necessary ~:for motor vehicle fu~ls) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-conmercial name) CAS ~ (if known) Chemical Previously Stored (if different) Ge Transfer of Ownersht~ Date of ~-ansfer Previous Facility Name I, previous Owner accept fully all obligati~ns''of' Permit NO. issued to I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the facility upon receiving this completed form. Permit to Operate this ~dergro~d storage This fora has been completed under Penalty of true and correct. sight.re perjury and to the best of my knowledge is Title Date Div'ision of Environment~l Ilth 1700 Flower Street, BakerS~I~ .d, CA 93305 Appiicati~ 9ate - ~ ~-.~ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDE~fi~ROUND · HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STOhb~E FACILITY Type o__~fAppli~ation (check'): [~New Facility [-1Modification of Facility ~Existing Facility i-]Transfer of Cl~nersh: A. 5mergency 24-Ho. Ur Contact (n~ame, area ccde, phone): Days Facility ~ ]~CO REFINING AND MARKETING Ik~C ~ of B~ine~s (check): ~1~ne SUti0n '~er (de~ri~) Is Tank(s) ~cat~ on ~ ~ricultural Faro? ~Y~ Is Tank(s) Us~ ~i~rily for ~[icultural ~r~ses? ~Yes ~sis for Soil ~ ~ Gro~,r ~P~ ~cemi~tions De Contractor Address Proposed Starting Dat~ Worker's Campensatiai% CertiffCa{ion t CA Contractor's License No. Zip Telep~ons Proposed Canpletion Oste Insurer If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Existirg Facility, Briefly D~scriba P~dificatior Prodosed , E. Tank(s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ~ Product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular Premium Diesel Waste ' - fuJ1 -------- --6II- D [] [] F. Chen~ca Ccnpasit!an of ~aterials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fu~ls) Tank ~ Chemical Stored (ncn-cammerclal name) CAS [ (if known) Chemical Previously Stored (if different) Ge Transfer of .~nership Date of '~-ansfer previous Facility Name I, Previous Owner ~odi'fy or terminate the facility upon receiving this campleted form. accept fully all ok;l'igations of Permit No. 'issued t . I understand that the Permittirg Authority may review ar. transfer of the Permit to Operate this undergro~d stora¢3, This form has been campleted under l~nalty of true a~ correct. perjury and to the best of my knowledge TANK ~ r ! (FILL OUT ~EPARATE FORMI, EACH TANK) FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ~,J'.l'. APPROPRIATE BOXES 1. Tank is: [-]Vaulted ~N°n-Vaulted [~Double-Wall J~Single-Wall 2. ~ Material [] Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel  Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic -[] Concrete [] Alum~intm~ [] Bronze []Unknown Other (describe) 3. Primary Contair~nent Date Installed Thic~ess (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) Manufacturer · i ?.T,F ., oz d 4. Tank secondary Containment []Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner ~lLined Vault ~None [-]Unkno~n []Other (describe): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Lining ~-[~Rubber l-]Alkyd []Epoxy '[]Phenolic []Glass I-]Clay ~U~l. ined []-]Unknown []Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --~Galvar~ized -~~ass-Clad [-~Pol~thylene Wrap []Vinyl Wrappin~ r~Tar or Asphalt I-)Unknown .~None l-lOther (describe): Cathodic Protection: []None I IImpressed Current System ~lSacrfficial Al~e Syst~Ii ~rib~ System & Equi~ent: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception a. Tank: ~lVisual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitoring' Wall(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring ~l!(s) WU-Tube Without Liner ~[]U-Tube with C~patible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring Wall(s)* Vapor Detector* [] Liquid Level Sensor* [~ Conductivit~ Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank [] Liquid Rstrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring ~11 or .Annular Space Daily Gaugirg & Inventory Reconciliation [ Periodic Tightness Testing None i-I Unknown [] Other b. Piping: ~ Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping" []Monitoring S~p with Race~y []Sealed Concrete Race~ay l-]Half-Cut C~mpatible Pipe Raceway [] Synthetic Liner Raceway []None [-] Unknown [ Other *Describe Make & Model: Tank Tightness ~--~is Tank Been Tightness Tested? ~Yes ~No ~-]Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test Name Testing C~npany Tank ~ Tank Repai red? [ Yes ~No []unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection  Operator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level' Tape Float Gauge ~Float Vent Valves [ Auto Shut- Off Controls ~Capacitance Sensor []']Sealed Fill Box [~None F]unknown [~Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Pipxng . Thickness (inches) Diameter ,,z~_Manufacturer /~c~ 'f-A,,~~L/~-~A. ~Pressure []Suction [']Gravity Approximate Length of Pipe ~ / b. Underground Pipirg Corrosion Protection : [Galvanized [Fiberglass-Clad [Impressed CUrrent []-)Sacrificial Anode []Polyethylene Wrap ~Electrical Isolation [Vinyl Wrap ~'lTar or Asphalt []Unknown ~None []Other (describe): Undergrour~ Pipirg, Secondary Contairm~ent: []Double-Wall ~Synthetic Liner System ~None []Unknown [2]Other (describe): 0 e e e TANK .~ (FILL OUT :~EPARATE ,~ EACH T~K) · F~R EACH SECTION,~ECK-----~'APPROPRIATE BOXES Tank is: r VaUite U, n-Vault 'GOouble-Wall ~ Material ~Car~n Stol ~ Stainless Steel ~ ~l~inyl C~oride ~ Fi~rglass~!~ Stol Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze Other (de~ri~) Priory Contai~nt ~te I~stall~ ~ic~ess (~nches) Ca.city (~llons) ~nufacturer Tank SeCbnda ry _Conta i ~men~ ' ~Other (de~rl~): ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~'e~ (Inches) Ca.city (Gals.) Tank Interior Lini~ ~Other (de~ri~): Tank Corrosion Protection ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): '' Cath~ic Proration: ~ne ~pres~ ~rent S~t~ ~crlf~c~al '~ri~ Syst~ & Equi~ent: Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vauit~ tan~s only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~l!(s) ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wl~ut ~ner ~ Pressure ~n~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank- ~ Li~id ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~11 or ~ar  ily ~i~ & i~entory Reconciliation ~ri~ic Tigh~m~ None ~ ~o~ ~ ~her b. Plpi~: ~ Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~tector(s) for Pre~uriz~ ~nitori~ S~p %~th ~ce~y ~al~ C~rete ~ce~y ~ Unkno~ ~ ~her . Tank Tightness . ~is ~ ~en Tigh~ess ~st~? ~Yes ~ ~kno~ ~te of ~st 'Tightne~ Test Results of Test Test ~e ~sti~ C~ny Tank Re~l r Ta~ ~ Re~l r~? ~ Yes ~[~ ~kno~ ~te(s) of ~ir(s) i0. O-~er fil 1 Protection ~O/~erator Fillsr Centrols, & Visually Monitors [nvel ~Tape Float Gauge ~Float Vent Valves [-]_Auto Shut- Of~ Controls ~_~Capacitance Sen~or [-]'-3~aled Fill Box ~None [-]Unknown [-]Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: ~Yes I-]No ['qUnkn{)wn Material A~~ Thickness (inches) Diameter ~essure ~SuctiOn ~GravitY ~roxi~te ~ Of'Pi~ ~ / ' ' b. Undergro~ Pipi~ Corrosion Proration : ~lvanized ~Fi~rglass~l~ ~esS~ ~rrent ~crificial ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical Isolati~ ~Vinyi Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipit, Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~al! ~~etic Liner ~st~ ~ne ~kno~ ~Other (de~ri~): e Be de TRNK ,3_ (FILL PUT SEPARATE ,JR EACH TANK) FOR F~ICH SECTION, CHEC~ ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES Tank is: . []Vaulted ~N0n-Vaulted [~Double-Wall J~Single-Wall Tan~ Material [-ICarbon Steel [-]stainless Steel rqpolyvinyl Chloride ~-]Fiberglass-Clad Steel  Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [-]Concrete [-] Al un i nL~n [']Bronze [-]Unknown Other (descr ibe) Primary Contairur.~nt Date Installed 771ickness (Inches) Capacity .(Gallons) Manufacturer Tank Sec-ondar~ Co~{tai. nment "' ' ' i'qDouble-Wall ~Synthet. i¢ Liner []']Lined Vault. [~.None I-IUnkno,~ i-]Other (describe): Manufacturer: [~Material Thicknejs (inches) Capacity (Gals.) Tank Interior Li'~'ing ---~Rubber []']Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic ri]GlasS l-lClay ~unlined ['it~kno~n []']Other (describe): Tank Corrosion Protection --~Galvanize~' -~]Fib~r'~iass-Clad [-]Polyethylene Wrap [-]Vinyl Wrappir~] []Tar or Asphalt [-]Unknown _~None [-]Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: []None []]Impressed Current System ~lSacri'~iclal ~rib~ System & Equilxnent: Leak Detection, Monitorir~, and Interception a. Tank: ~-]Visual (vaulted tanks onlyi ' ~'Groundwater Monitoring' ~mll(s) [-] Vadose..Zone Monitoring Well (s) ~ U-Tube Without Liner []U-Tube with Cc~npatible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring ~.ll(s) [] Vapor Dstector* [] Liquid Level Sensor' [] Conductivity Sensor' [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank [] Liquid i%etrieval & Inspection Fr~ U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Arln~ilar Space  Daily Gaugirg & Inventory Reconciliation [] Periodic Tightness Testln=3 None [] Unknown [] Other b. Piping: )< Flow-Restricting Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Pipi~c]~ []Monitoring S~p with Race~ay [-]Sealed Concrete Race~ly r-IH al f-Cut Ccmpatible Pip~ Raceway []Synthetic Liner Race~ay ~']None []Unknown [] Other *Describe Make & Mo~el: "~ ' - ~ ..... Tank Tightness ~is Tank Been Tightness Tested? Date of Last Tightness Test Test I~ .~-~ame Tank RePair Tan~' Repaired? []Yes ~No l-]Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs [-]Yes [~No •Unknown Results of Test Testing C~pany iG. ~er fill Protection ~Operator F--{1-1s: Controls, & Visuall~ Monitors Level [.]Tape Float Gauge [~Float Vent Valves [] Auto Shut- Off Controls ~Capacitance Sensor g]Sealed Fill Box I-]None [-]t~known [-]Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices i1. Pip:ng a. L~dergr~und Piping: ~Yes []No []Unknown Materiai/~4~_z~ ~['~/~_~:_ Thickne~_s~.~ (inches) Diameter ~7_" Manufacturer /~ ~Pres~ure [[]Suction []Gravity -Approximate Length of Pipe ~ . / b. Underground Pipi?g Corrosion Protection : [[]Galvanized []Fiberglass<lad []]Impressed Current []Sacrificial Anode [-]Polyethylene Wrap [2]Electrical Isolatio~ rqvinyl Wrap [[]Tar or Asphalt []]Unkno%~n ~None [-]Other (describe): Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: ~Double-Wall ~-~.~S~ynt~hetic Liner Syst~m ~bne ~Unkn.cwn ~C]jOther (d~scr ibe): .c. TANK __ .5___ (FILL OUT SEPARATE R EACH TAN____~K) FOR EACH SECTICN', CHECK ALL APPROPRIA'~E BOXES Tank is: []]Vaulted ~Non-Vaulted []Double'Wall j~Single-Wal! ~ Material []] Carbon Steel [] Stainless Steel [] Polyvin¥l C.hloride [] Fiberglass-Clad Steel  Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic []]Concrete []]Al~in~ []Bronze []Unknown Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Pate Installc~d Thic[uness (Inches) . 4. TanR secondary Co~t'~inment []Double-Wall [] Synthetic Liner ~-]Other (describe): []M~terial 5. Tank Interior Lining [']Other (descri~): Capaci ty (Gallons) Manufacturer []Lined Vault ~None [~L~kno~n Manufacturer: Thickness (Inches) Capacity (Gals.) [']Phenolic [][]Glass Ii]Clay ~t~lin~d []Unknown 6. Tank Corrosion Protection --]~Galvani'zed -~nf~--'~ass-Clad []Polyethylene Wrap [-]Vinyl Wrapping []-]Tar or Asphalt [-]Unknown _~None [-~Other (describe): '' Cathodic Protection: []None [_~Impressed Current System [~acrifictal A~ode System Describ~ System & Equipment: 7. Leak Detection, Monitorin~j, and Intercep. tion a. Tank: []]Visual ('vaulted tanks only)"' []Groundwater Monitorirg' Wail(s) [] Vadose:.Zone Mcnitorir~3 ~ell(s) [] U-Tube Without Liner [-]U,Tube with C~patible Liner Directing Flow to Monitoring Wmll(s)" [] Vapor D~tector* [] Liquid Level Sensor~ [] Conductivit~ Sensor* [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank- [-] Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Ann~tlar Space . Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation [']Periodic Tightness Testing None ~ Unknown [-] Other b. Piping: ~ Flow-Restrictirg Lea~ Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping' ~-]Monitoring Strap with Race~ay []Sealed Concrete Race~y []Half-Cut Compatible Pipe Raceway. [~Syntbetic Liner Racs~ay []None [] Unknowr~ [] O~her ~De.-ocribe Make & Model: f{e~ 17~-/~/- ,~' -~~ ~./ 8. Tank Tightness ~-~his TanR Been Tightness Tested? [[]Yes [~No []Unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Results of Test Test }imme Testing Company 9. Tank Rev~a i r Tank Repar~ed?' []Yes ~No' [-]Unknown Date(s) of R~pair(s) Describe Repairs 10. Overfill Protection .O~__rator Fi!~'s~ Controls, & Visually Monitors Leuel ~ape Float Gauge ~Float Vent Valves [q Auto Shut- Off Controls ~-]Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box [-]None []Unknown [-]Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices Il. Pip~.nc2 a. bT~dergro~md Piping: ~Yes I-]No [2]Uni~pwn Material ~e,~'~e~ Thickne~ (i~hes) Di~eter ~ Manufacturer _/~ · ~essure ~S~tion ~Gravi~y ~proxi~te ~ of Pi~ ~ / b. Undergro~ Pipir~ Corrosion Proration : ~C~lvanized ~Fibergiass<l~ ~ess~ ~rrent ~criftcial ~e ~Polye~yle~ Wrap ~Electrical I~lati~ ~Vinyl Wrap ~Tar or ~lt ~Unkno~ ~None ~her (de~ri~): c. Undergro~ Pipi:~ Seco~ary Contai~nt: ~l~all ~S~thetic Liner ~stc~ ~ne ~kno~ ~Other {describe): Facil it!/ N~ne TEXACO REFINING H. I. e e TANK .~ ~ (FILL OUT HEP~TE FO~ ~ 'T~K) --~R ~ SEnIOr, ~ECK ~[[ ~PROPRIATE ~XES. Tank is: ~Vault~ ~Dn-Vault~ ~uble-Wall ~i~le~all ~Car~n Stol ~Stainless Steel ~l~inyl C~oride ~Fi~rglass~l~ Steel Fi~rglass-Reinforc~ Plastic ~Concrete ~in~ ~Bronze ~k~ Other (de~r i~) Priory Contai~nt ~te Install~ ~ic~ess ('Inches) Ca.city (~llons) ~nufacturer Tank ~nda ry Contai~ent ~l~Wall ~thetic Liner ~Lin~ Vault ~ne ~o~ ~Other (de~ri~): ~ufacturer: ~terial Thic~ess (Inc~s) Ca.city (Gals.) Tank Interior Lini~ ~~r ~k~ ~xy ~enolic ~Glass ~Clay ~lin~ ~Other (de~rl~): Tank Corrosion Protection ~Galvanf~ ~ass-Cl~ ~l~yle~ ~ap ~Vinyl ~a~l~ ~Tar or ~p~lt ~k~ ~No~ ~Other (de~ri~): Cath~ic Proration: ~'~ne ~pres~ ~rrent S~t~ ~%ri~icial ~e ~t~ ~ri~ Syst~ & Equi~ent: Leak Detection, ~nitori~, and Interception a. Tank: ~Vis~l (vault~ t~ks only) ~Gro~ter ~nitori~' ~11 ~Vadose Zone ~nitori~ ~ll(s) ~U~ Wi~ut ~ner ~ Pressure ~n~r in ~ular S~ce of ~uble Wall Tank" ~ Liquid ~tri~al & Ins~ction Fr~ U-T~, Monitori~ ~1!  ily & I~entory Reconciliation ~ Peri.lc Tigh~e~ T~ti~ None b. Pipit: Fl~Restricti~ ~ak ~t~tor(s) for Pre~uriz~ Pipit' ~nitori~ S~p ~th ~ce~y ~al~ C~crete ~ce~y O~lf~t C~tible Pi~ ~ce~y ~S~t~tic Liar ~ U~no~ ~ O~er *Describe Make & Model: 8. Tank Tightness l~is Tank Been Tightness Tested? Date of Last Tightness Test Te'st Name 9. Tank Re~air Tank Re~---~-~red? [2lYes ~No [~Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs 10. []Yes J~No D Unknow~ Results of Test Testing C~mpany Overfill Protection ~Operator Fills, Controls, & visually Monitors Level 'tT Tape Float Gauge ~Float Vent Valves []Auto Shut- Off Controls rqCapacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Box []None [-]Unknown r']other: List Make & Model For Above Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: ~Yes [~No [-]Unknpwn 'Material /{e~~ ,~,~M//~_~- Thickness (inches) Diameter ~_~___.Manufacturer /~_~ ~7..~5~-;~ ' / DPressure rqSuct'ion .~Gravity ~proximate Length of Pipe R~ b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : . []Galvanized ~Fiberglass-Clad E]Im[xessed Current []Sacrificial Anode [']Polyethylene Wrap []Electrical Isolatio~ r-]vinyl Wrap [-]Tar or Asphalt [']Unknown ~None ~Other (describe): c. Underground Plpirg, Secondary Contair~ent: [~Double-Wall [-]Synthetic Liner System ~None r-]unkno%a% ~Other (descr i~) ~ Permits # Facility Name !nspe(:tor Date PINAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST / / Plot plan notes Plot Diagram Ali new and existing tanks located on plot plan? Does tank product correspond to product labels ,on plot plan? Was there no modifications identified which were not depicted on the plot plans? If "No" described Yes / No Are monitoring wells secure and free ot water and product, in sump? 5, Is piping system pressure, suction or grav~*¥'? "' Are Red Jacket subpumps and ali line leak detector accessible? Type oT line leak detector if any Overfill containment box as specified on application? If "No". what type and model number: Yes No a) c) Identify type of monitoring: Is fill box tightly sealed around fill tube? Is access over water tight? Is product present in flit box? -I a) b) c) Are manual monitoring instruments, product and water finding paste on premises? Is the fluid level in Owens-Corning iiquld level monitoring reservoir and alarm panel in proper operating condition? Does the annular space or secondary containment liner leak detection system have self diagnostic capabilities? If "Yes", is it functional If "No", how is it tested for proper operating condition? 9. Notes on any abnormal conditions: KERN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT ~DERGROUND STORAGE FACILITY PERMIT ~ 280009M FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS: Texaco RennyIs 3698 Ming Avenue Bakersfield, CA. OWNER(S) NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS: Texaco Refi.ning Co. P.O. Box 3756 Los Angeles, CA. 9'0051 NEW BUSINESS CHANGE OWNERSHIP RENEWAL MODIFICATI OTHER )' PERMIT EXPIRES September 19, 1986 ~ APPROVAL DATE September 19, 1985 ~ APPROVED '" BY ..... ) S~ Joe Canas POST THIS PERMIT ON PREMISE CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS: Note: All pertinent equipment and materials used in this construction are subject to identification and approval by the Permitting Authority prior to construction. This permit is issued contingent upon guaranteed compliance with the guidelines as determined by the Permitting Authority 2. All construction to be as per facility plans approved bY this department and verified by inspection by Permitting Authority. 3. 'Permittee must contact Permitting Authority for on-site inspection(s) with 48 hours advance notice. 4. Construction inspection record is included with permit given to Permitte~ This card must be posted at jobsite prior to initial inspection. Permittee must contact Permitting Authority and arrange for each group of required inspections numbered as per instructions on card. Generally inspections will be made of: a. Tanks and backfill b. Overfill protection and leak detection/monitoring c. Any other inspection deemed necessary by Permitting Authority 5. All equipment and materials in this construction must be installed in accordance with all manufacturers' specifications. 6. Monitoring requirements for this facility wil! be described on final "Permit to Operate". Accepted By Date KERN COfR~TY HEALTH DEPARTM~ ~qVIROh~ENTAL HEALTH DIVISION HAZARDOUS SUBSTANTES SBCTION INSPECTION ~ 1700 FLOWER STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 'PHONE (805) 861-3636 PHONE NO2 ' ' ' "-~" INSTRUCTIONS: Please call for an inspector only whe~ each group of insPeCtions with the sane number are ready. They will run in consecutive order beginning with ~r 1. DO NOT cover work for any numbered group until all irons in that group are signed off by the Permitting Authority.' Following these instructions will reduce the number of required in~p~c, tion visits an~ therefore prevent asses~nent of additional fees. ~'"~...~_~/~c ~---~'~°~ ~ .~~-~-h - TANKS & ~ILL - INSP~ TION DATE INSPECTOR / ~ackfi'll of Tank(s) Spark Test Certification Cathodic Protection of Tank (s) - PIPING SYSTEM- Piping & Raceway w/Collection S~np Corrosion Protection of Piping, Joints, Fill Pipe Electrical Isolation of Piping From Tank(s) Cathodic 'Protection Syst~n-Piping - SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, OVERFILL PROTECTION, LEAK DETECTION - Liner Installation - Tank(s) Liner .Installation - Piping Vault With Product Compatible Sealer Level Gauges or Sensors, Float Vent Valves · /!'Product Compatible Fill Box (es) Product Line Leak Detector (s) Leak Detector(s) for Annular Space-D.W. Tank(s) Monitoring Well (s) Leak Detection Device(s) For Vadose/Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Caps & Locks Fill Box Lock Monitoring'Requirenents LICENSE g:akersfie!d, CA 932?'5 ~305> ~51-3636 Facility Name and ?.enney~ a Texaco ~er~ice ~c.k~r ~f!eid, i ,'_ank(s) a~ above location Accepted by: Kerr% Cou[~i:y .~ie.tlth ~pacf:;he,~r. Division of Environmtmt;,'~l Heat 1700 Fto~er Street, B,qke[*sf[el~t, CA %ppi [cation / F.,~- No. of Tanks~"'to be .~.~]ndo~]ed 'APPLICATION FOR PE~tlT FOR TEMH]I%%'~ OR PERMANENT HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY T_~ of A_~.plication (Fill Out One Application Per Facility) ~T~tnporary .Closure/Abandonment [~ Pemanent Closure/Abandonment Project Contact (imame, area code, phone): Days Z/:- ?a;-¢~*! Nights Facility Name q-~W-~- ¢ ~ __ Do Facility Address '~9~ ~-l~d._ Nearest Cross St. ~ T R SEC (Rura---I Lodations Only) Owner_ ~o~_~..~~ __Telephone .~dd~ess · ~-~D ~/~-~-'~ ~"~ Zip ?.~?i- ~ Ope ra tot Telephone Address Zip Water to Facility Provided by Soil Characteristics at Facility Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Determinations Depth to Groundwater Tank Removal Contractor ~ ~_ d-...~-~-I ~ ~%;- CA License Address ~ ~ ~~ ~~~Zip p/~z~ TeleX]one Pro~s~ Starti~ DaCe ~-~ --~ ~-- Pro~s~ C~pletion ~te ~rker's C~nsation CertifibatiOn ~'~/< ?~-~ Insurer Enviror~n~ntal Assessment Contractor Address Proposed Starting Date ; Worker s Compensation CertificatiOn :% CA License No. Zip Telephone Proposed Completion Date Insurer Chemical Composition of Materials Stored Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-co~nercial name) Da~es Stored Chemical Previously Stored (if different) to to E. Describe Method for Retrieving Samples Labocatory That Will Perform Analyses of Samples Address Telephone F. This application for: ' ~'removal or ~abandonment in place * * PLEA_SE PROI/IDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET BEFORE SUBMIT?ING ~PPLICATION FOR REVIEW. "Phis form has been completed under penalty of perjury an~ to the best of my knowledge is true and correct. ' [gna ture ........................... 'Fi tie Pro';ide D~scrLpu~on ~ica~ L'~¥out of F~ci!ity ~ace Proqided Below; Inch]de All the Fol[oWl~ [nfo~mat[o~: Location of Tank(s) , piping & Oispense~(s) Proposed S~npling Location,s Indicating Appro×i~.~ate Depth of Samples Nearest Street or Intersection Any Water Wells or Surface Waters Within 100' Radius of Faci l i ty NORTH CUSI'~I~ER MISCELLANEOUS ANALYSIS DAT~ RECEIVED DESCRIPTION TYPE ANALYS I S ,0, Z.~TL$ -2SO OpW' MODEL ~'84-.P 5?lt.L. O)klT^iH Ei~ MNU NOL.~. · u I ','~r, FRP RISER i 2'~ O" LFILL ,' MONITOR 'MODEL ~t J04-AN }AAH HOLE' e.e~ t (."~NmETE :SL~E, W/ (,, x G,((,, i~.w.w.n,t. , 7,_ 0'8_L" DOUBLE- WALL TANK 2"DIA. FIBERGLASS TANK VENT. SLOPE I/4" PER FT MIN FROM VENT RISER 2" FIBERGLASS'ANNULUS VENT LINE W/I'/2"GALV. /~3Vg .~OUHD. w/oPW' ~.23 ',;mr. 550/1000 GALLON DBL. .WALL FIBERGLASS TANK (w^s~ O,L } J:xIF-,A ~;I;7.AvF_..L D^~SEFILL E'~ HI [bit. D' ',h'M 11 -- ~ VAi. VE "~Ai H HOSE' ~[iST. ~T~F..L TAu 14 'I~tT MA~ l.~O ':._UIdLEAD El>: WHITE · '.:" ! "' --WI~Ap PE'O J ..SPILL CONTAINER' F'ILL EISE~ NO $CAL~' WM PLEAS[ PRINT 1. OWNER P,o~,v ~ Teflk(I) ~ Data~k.jrt for Tank System Tigil :ss Test m~ ~"~, petro TIte _ _ - TANK TESTER DArJ~: Z. OPE~TOR ~~ 3. R~SON FOR ~ ~~ ~I~88 0~ ...... TEST ~- ~~ ~/~~ (E~et. FuIN) 4. WHO REQUESTED TEST AN0 WHEN 5. WHO IS PAYING FOR THIS TEST7 TANKiS) INVOLVED el' 7. INSTALLATION DATA 8. UNDERGROUND WATER 9. FILL-UP ARRANGEMENTS T~iohom, Dill T"illh~ Cap~city ibJndlSuplMiw SlNIIFibe~ Idenlif~ by Direction CovM ~ MiMfo~ Coflc~, Bl'ck Top, Ei~h, etC. Siphoflel LOCIIIQfl No~ In~le ddwrwiv. RI4J ol ItaflO., ftc. Pumpl o.,. to th. w.to, ,.bi. _ /'S° '~' ~ Mike If k~wn TMIDhOnI le ~he wire ovi( the tank ['-'~ YeA '~No Nell Exlre ~oducl lo "top off' and run TSP. How end who to ~vide ? Con~ NO ~ld. fO( nolicl or inquiry ' ' ComDiny TMe~ho~e 10. CONTRACTOR. - MECHANICS. Iffy OthM COflttlClO~ involved OTHER INFORMATION OR ,REMARKS Additionll informetlon on any iteml above. Officiell or othetl to bi Idviled when telling il in p¢ogreel m completed. VJJJ~Ofl o~ obllfVl~l p~mnt during tell etc. Teete we., mede on the abeve rank my~tem. In II dMltild oft ittlched lest chlrtl w~th r. ult~ si folioll: Tight TEST RESULTS 11. 12. 13. CERTIFICATION _ July 1, 1~§0 Vamious- Thio Il to ~ thlt thol4 tmlk lyltoml WWl tilted off the dltlds) thom1, b~lndiCltOd la "119flt" mid( Ifil cdflfll ~ by t~ NitJonlJ Fire Protection AioClltlm~ PlmphlM 329. , TANK 'm,.,m~m~,o, ~, co,,~. ~,: ,.' s,..,.,. / __ / · T.P. ]'~""%/ " .G ,F~+.A~.HILI.5, CA 0X344 " Fo~m 56~ ~- TANK TESTING P.O. BOX 3613 · -$ GRANADA HILLS, CA 91344 petro Tde LiNE TESTER TANK TESTER HEATH co.su,~.,s INCORPORATED 100 TO$CA DRIVE 15. TANK TO TEST 16. [] ammo ir~ G~oe S4N S,K't~on "DETERMINING TANK CAPACITY" [] C)'th~ ' (-'('~ 17. FILL-UP FOR TEST IO I~ im Gl, IMm Fig/4), STICK IEFORE AND AFTER ~.AC:H COMP~qTMENT DROP OR [ACH MLrTERED DEL~,'ERY OUANTTTY ~OP OPP .... .~j.4,.,,,' SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS TANJ; n u el a~.'c1~or'4 op~ cebie Check I~low end ~cc~l Faxx~l~um M lDO (2e). [] WM~r in ~ [] 1'limb wit. t~ ~ ~ .~rw [] Uno(i) bMng l~ ~ LVLLT VAPOR FI~COVERY SYSTEM I~ s-,~. '"'~c A~ 19. TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR TSTT ASSEMBLY eo, on, o~ ~,,~ ,o O,~', ................... Jql ,, A,:k~ ~," ~ 4" L ................. ,,~0 ,, ~2~ f~3' LMAr~&I ....... ~ ,, Tot~,,,ubmgtol~,,sembJ~ Al:~xi~te ....... J '7) " 20. EXTENSION HOSE SE]'rlNG Tenk t(~ m gra~e'. ................................. '1'~ Fi~ I~P~ ex1~b Ibovt ~. g~ ~ o1 fdl TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a)TO TEST THIS TANK TI)(~y TI~") ~: ~:)l~er~ . ~' F ~u~ m T~k __' F ~ ~u~ ~ T~ck Di~tl pM 'F i~ ringe of expected chenge., · qMun~ c. hinge m th~l ~ pe~'F TANK TESTINO P.O. BOX. 3613 ('~.C)A&JAr~A UII le /'~'A (~l"Jaa 15. TANK TO TEST L~f~.~.T__H~~ l~lflr Dy pofmo~ 1'7. FILL-UP FOR TEST F~I tap. STICK BEFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMENT DROP OR EACH MEI~RED DEL/VERY QUANTrrY 9, 8/(~ J8. ,SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCE~DURES TO TEST THIS TANK VAPOR RECO~RY SYSTEM 19. TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR TsI-r ASSEMBLY .o.~ ~ ,.,,~ ,o o,.,,-. ......... J q 7-. .. A~d )0" fo~ 4" L ................. ~ ,, Add24 fm 3" L m ~h' ~,a! ....... '-~' ",, To,.' ,u~.g m luemblt Apf~o.im,e,. ........ ~ 7 ~' " 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING ?ink top tD grldt' .................................. Ir me~"~'ho,~m o~ m,g~iofl tub~ 8~ o4r mom t~,o,~, ,~ ~ .................................... C',~30 " '1~ Fil~ I~pw e.~rle~d~. ,~:~o~ F~Je. ,,.- lop of fdl. ~z a~ . ~/. $ C. O. E. 21. TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (re) TO TEST THIS TANK llTIN:l~Warm~i_' C4:~er': .__'F Pi*O~ucfmllnk 'f Fill-up~oOuClOnTruck 'F [xpecledCl~q*of-) TANK TESTING P.O; BOX 3613 15. TANK TO TEST ~ly Dy U 16. CAPACITY b S~-'Imn "DrT[RMINING TANK C~PACrI'Y" G~m. 17. FILL-UP FOR TEST FIJI up. STICK BIFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMEMT DROP OR EACH 'MrI~RED DIrUVERy OUANTTT~ ~ Inm~di.g~ Te~d G~ons ,18. ,SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS lANKier1 _'~ ~;'~ VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM CO~ 19. TANK M[ASUREMENTS FOR TST'T ASSEMBLY eo.o~n o~ ~,~ ,o G.,~e'. .................. . / ,,.~ c~ ,. · ,~ ~"~,," t ................. ~0 - Add;d gm3' Lmeh*ml ........ -~ ,, 20. EXTENSION HOSE SmwG ti8 l*~'~k mp ~ ~KI~'. ............................. · .... E~:l ~o~ o~ ~'t~n rum 6' ~' mom ~'1~ Fill rope erlemh Mm,vt g~m:le, line 1o~ of Id! C. O. E. 21. TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a)TO TEST THIS TANK I~ TOaay ~G~m~q'? T: C4:~N:~er? . ~' F P'rOOuC~ m Tl~lk __* F ,¢~l~p P'T~uC10~ Truck 23. ~, ~ ~ m ,~ o, ,~ c~ .. ~0~ 24. 25. · 5, % 3z.8 w-, v~um~ chenge i~ th~ tan& TANK TE.,~TING P.O. BOX 3613 I~ ~. , p~~ ~ FO~ ~O. . 4T ~ Lo~ L~VEL ~C~DI~ ~ r ~,()~0 (~flzco~ ~- ~e ~, GRANA')AHILLS, C~913~, · )O. Nti VOLUME ~,)~. lb. ,~U. HYDROSTATIC 'J I. YO(UI[ li[ASUI~IliNTS (1~ '~' T'LIIP~ilATUI~ C04d~IISATIO41 Ct4AJiGiS A~CUMULAT[O J p~A~ A~A FOE ' 26. ~0. HYDROSTA~IC ii. ~. ~.~ YO~! ~9. ACCUMULATED · L0~ OF TEST (14 k.) , 5b-o / 2q ~/7 ~,3o3 /~/¢ ., ,, ., 26. 30. HY0n0S~^T~C 31. 34. 38,,[T voruH~ 39. 27. 28. ~S K~D~ ~, 20. b~ 32. ~ ~ 35, ~.~p 37.~ T~ a~~~ ~ ~ ~,~. '" [ANK T~l NG ,, , P O. ~X~ ;!3 GRAN,~DA HILL~ :A 913~ TANF TEEING ~ "' P.o. ~]ox 3613 ~P~gA ~L~, CA .!~ .