Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRISK MANAGEMENT· ;' ROOM 34 ROOM 33 ROOM 32 ROOM 31 ROOM 30 F~OOM 29 .~; ROOM'28 ~J- .I. .~.. <" ROOM 26 ROOM 27 """i ROOM 25 "'-" ROqM 24 ROOM 23 ROOM 22 ROOM 21 '-,, ROOM 20 · : ROOM 18 ROOM 16 ROOM 19 "--,,, OOM 17 .-"- ROOM 15 ROOM 14 'x ROOM 12 ROOM 13 ROOM 11 .-'. ~ ROOM 9 .:, ROOM 10 .4' ROOMS,.,., ..-,., : ~! RO%ML · = ROOM 6 t ROOM 5 '-' ROOM 4 ~-t ROOM 3. ~' ROOM 2 ~j ROOM 1 REVISED '//% #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 LEGEND FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE FACILITY DIAGRAM DATE 12/90 I 1114.0010A IEXHIBIT 2 ROOM 34 ROOM 32 ROOM 30 .I ¢ ROOM 26 · 7. ROO. M 24 ROOM 22 ROOM 33 ROOM 31 ROOM 25 ROOM 23 ROOM 21 '-o. ROOM 20 ROOM 19 "'" '~"~ ROOM14 ~i ROOM 12 ROOM 15 L , .r ROOM 13 ROOM 11 .-'. ROOM 10 ROOM 9 ROOM 8 '~ ROOM 7 '~1 ROOM6== ~=.~ ROOM5,:= = ROOM4 ROOM 3. ROOM2 ~ ROOM1 ..... REVISED '¥% LEGEND #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS W Z i ,I N C.:.).~ BAKERSFIEt~D, CALII~ORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE FACILITY DIAGRAM DATE 12/90 J, ,4.oo,o^ JEXHIIBIT 2 September 6, 1996 Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Technician Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 RE: Kern Ice and Cold Storage, RMPP August 1996 Revision Dear Howard: Please find enclosed the revised RMPP for Kern Ice and Cold Storage. This RMPP has been revised and updated according to your request. This revision includes the items addressed in your review of the draft submitted earlier. Please note that Kern Ice and Cold Storage is currently in the process of updating the entire version of the Business Plan. Once the Business Plan update is complete, it will be forwarded to your office for replacement of the current plan in Appendix A. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. GMF/tlf Enclosure '~:"" ~ Richard Dixon, Kern Ice ~1!40010.010 . : , ~4700 STOCKDAL~ HIGHWAY, SUITE 120 4100 WESTHEIMER, SUITE 231 Manager BAKERSFIELp, CALIFORNIA 93309 (805) 326-1112 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (713) 877:1 i'~9 FAX: (805) 326'0191 FAX: (713) 877~1923 ROOM 34 ROOM 33 "'.',-- ~ , ROOM 32 ROOM 31 '",, ROOM 30 ZOOM 29 .I ' '~' ROOM 26 ~ ROOM 25 ROOM 24 ~ ROOM 23 ROOM 22 ROOM 21 "-,, " ROO,.M. 20.... ~. ROO..M 1.9 ',".p ROOM 18 '.:,' ROOM16 ~ ROOM15 '*'L · : ROOM 14 ~ ROOM 13 .... - . . ,~. '¥"' , r-~ ~,. r. ROOM12 '~ ROOM11 ~.~. I / .:4' ROOM6 ~ ROOM5 ,~j~ '": ROOM4 5 ~" _ ROOM~_. ~ ROOM1 -*> / .... REVISED #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 LEGEND FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS WZI INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE FACILITY DIAGRAM DATE I1114.0010A I EXHIBIT 12/90 2 AMMONIA COMPRESSORS SUCTION ~---~ 2 ~ DISCHARGEN .~-~1 ~ ~ N__ SUCTION DISCHARGE KNOCKOUT VESSELS TYPICAL FREEZER ROOM R E COLD,~.~.., OW PRESSURE RETURN [LIQUID OIL SEPARATOR · ~~ACC~UMULATOR EVAPORATIVE CONDENSER PRECOOLER v^Po~ I~ KING VALVE (MANUALLY OPERATED),~.,~, MMONIA RECEIVE~ / HIGH PRESSURE RETURN I J.~...EIFXLCoEwSS EXPANSI~ TYPICAL _.~ COOLER ROOM KING VALVE -~ (SOLENOID VALVE OPERATED) EMERGENCY DIFFUSION TANK TO COMPRESSOR SUCTION HEADER L KERN ICE AND COLD STORAGE COMPANY RISK MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION PROGRAM INCLUDING PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT December 1990 Revised April 1991 Revised August 1996 Submitted to: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Prepared by: WZl Inc. 4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120 Bakersfield, California 93309 11140010.002 4700 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY, SUITE 120 4100 WESTHEIMER, SUITE 231 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 (805) 326-1 112 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (713) 877-1149 FAX: (805) 326-0191 FAX: (713) 877-1923 TABLE OF CONTENTS IV. Mo VI. VII. VIII. IX. Pa.qe INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 REVISION RECORD ............................................. 4 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ......................................... 6 A. Name and Location ......................................... 6 B. Business Telephone ........................................ 6 C. Nature of Business ......................................... 6 D. Business Hours ............................................ 6 ACUTELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (AHM) DESCRIPTION ............. 7 A. Anhydrous Ammonia System Capacity .......................... 7 B. Hazardous Properties of Ammonia ............................. 7 AHM PROCESS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION ........... 9 A. General Ammonia Refrigeration Processes ...................... 9 B. Operation of the Ammonia System ............................. 9 AHM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY .................... 11 AHM OPERATING PROCEDURES ................................. 20 AHM EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES ................................. 21 AHM DETECTION, MONITORING AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS PLUS ADDITIONAL RISK REDUCTION MEASURES ................... 22 A. Detection and Monitoring Systems ............................ 22 B. Automatic Control Systems .................................. 22 C. Additional Risk Reduction Measures .......................... 23 AHM HAZARD ANALYSIS ....................................... 24 AHM ACCIDENT/INCIDENT HISTORY, INVESTIGATION, RECURRENCE PREVENTION AND REPORTING PROCEDURES ..................... 25 A. Accidents at this Location ................................... 25 B. Accident/Incident Investigation and Recurrence Prevention Procedures 25 C. Release Reporting Procedures ............................... 25 D. Emergency Release Follow-Up Notice ......................... 26 Xll. Xlll. XIV. XV. XVI. XVll. XVlll. XlX. XX. XXI. XXII. FACILITY AHM EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS .................... 27 RMPP AUDIT PROGRAM ........................................ 28 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE ..................................... 29 RMPP RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ............................... 30 RMPP TRAINING PROGRAM ..................................... 31 RMPP SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS .................................. 32 AHM VENDOR AND CONTRACTOR PROGRAM ..................... 33 LOCKOUT/TAGOUT PROCEDURES ............................... 34 HOT WORK OPERATION PROGRAM .............................. 35 RMPP RECORD KEEPING ....................................... 36 QUALIFICATIONS OF CERTIFIERS ................................ 37 Qualified Person ............................................... 37 XXIII. RMPP CERTIFICATION ......................................... 38 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Location Map Facility Diagram Surrounding Area Ammonia Refrigeration System Process Flow Diagram Ammonia Incident Reporting Emergency Release Follow-Up Reporting Form and Instructions Emergency Evacuation Route APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Hazardous Materials Business Plan Operating Procedures Maintenance Procedures Hazard Analysis Emergency Response Plan RMPP Audit Checklist RMPP Training Checklist I. INTRODUCTION This Risk Management and Prevention Program (RMPP) has been developed to minimize the potential for release of Acutely Hazardous Materials (AHM) from the Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company facility located in Bakersfield, California. The facility utilizes anhydrous ammonia which is defined as an AHM under Chapter 6.95, Article 2, of the California Health and Safety Code (H&SC). A copy of the Company's Hazardous Materials Business Plan is included in Appendix A. At the request of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division, Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company prepared and submitted the original RMPP in 1990 and later revised it in 1991. Again, at the request of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division, this RMPP was revised and updated in June, 1996, to reflect the changes in the anhydrous ammonia system since the 1991 revision. As required under H&SC Section 25534(h), the Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company RMPP has been reviewed and revised by WZI Inc. This RMPP, as defined in Section 25532, contains: "all of the administrative and operational programs of a business which are designed to prevent acutely hazardous materials accident risks, including, but not limited to, programs which include design safety of new and existing equipment, standard operating procedures, preventive maintenance programs, operator training and accident investigation procedures, risk assessment for unit operations, or operating alternatives, emergency response planning, and internal or external audit procedures to ensure that these programs are being executed as planned." 11140010.002 1 These administrative and operational requirements are fulfilled through the inclusion of the following sections, which were included and approved in the original RMPP: Facility Description Accident History Equipment History Design and Operations Detection and Monitoring Operating Procedures Auditing and Inspecting Record Keeping Responsible Personnel Training Program Schedule of Actions Consequence Analysis Summary Certification Revisions This revision of Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company's RMPP also includes all of the management programs required under California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section 5189 for Process Safety Management (PSM) of AHM. These regulations contain requirements for preventing or minimizing the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable or explosive chemicals. Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company's programs required under PSM regulations parallel those of their RMPP which are also intended to prevent or minimize releases of AHM and eliminate or reduce the risk to employees. 11140010.002 2 Under CCR, Title 8, Section 5189, Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company may utilize the facility's RMPP prepared pursuant to Article 2, Chapter 6.95 (commencing with Section 25531) of Division 20 of H&SC to the extent that it satisfies the requirements of the stipulated subsections in the PSM regulation. Therefore, this RMPP document has been updated with additional sections to satisfy both RMPP and PSM regulations and requirements. These additional sections include: Facility Emergency Response Plans Management of Change AHM Vendor and Contractor Program Hot Work Operations Program Lockout/Tagout Procedures This RMPP revision is based upon an assessment of current processes, operations, and procedures of the Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company facility and considers results of hazards and operability studies that identified hazards associated with the storage and handling of AHM. Programs contained in the RMPP are intended to be used by designated employees. These employees will implement procedures detailed in this RMPP to improve upon, maintain and document facility safety. As specified in Section 25534 (f), Chapter 6.95, Article 2, H&SC, all records involving the RMPP shall be kept for a minimum of five years. If a modification is made to the facility that affects AHM handling, a revision of the RMPP must be made within 60 days of the modification and so documented in Section II of this report (Revision Record). 11140010.002 3 VVZl tNC II. REVISION RECORD All records conceming this RMPP shall be kept for at least five years (Section 25534 (f)). Necessary revisions to the RMPP will be made at least every three years. The RMPP must be revised within 60 days of a modification that materially affects the handling of an AHM (Section 25534 (h)). All revisions to this RMPP are to be recorded here. DATE PAGES/ OF CHANGES/INPUTS MADE TO SECTION CHANGE DOCUMENT AFFECTED SIGNATURE/DATE 4/91 Audit and Revise RMPP All 6~96 Audit and Revise RMPP All 11140010.002 4 DATE PAGES/ OF CHANGES/INPUTS MADE TO SECTION CHANGE DOCUMENT AFFECTED SIGNATURE/DATE 11140010.002 5 III. FACILITY DESCRIPTION A. Name and Location Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company 120 30th Street Bakersfield, California 93301 Exhibit 1 is a location map. A diagram of the facility is provided in Exhibit 2. The area immediately surrounding the Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company plant is Used for commercial, industrial and residential purposes, as shown in Exhibit 3. B. Business Telephone (805) 324-1911 C. Nature of Business Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company operates a warehouse consisting of cold storage rooms. Customers pay Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company for use of the rooms. Ammonia, an AHM, is used as a refrigerant to cool the storage rooms to desired temperatures. D. Business Hours Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 11140010.002 6 IV. ACUTELY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (AHM) DESCRIPTION A. Anhydrous Ammonia System Capacity Kern Ice and Cold Storage policy requires that the ammonia system is charged with a maximum of 6,200 pounds of ammonia. Shipments of ammonia are delivered infrequently to make up for ammonia that has escaped as fugitive emissions from the system. B. Hazardous Properties of Ammonia The term "anhydrous ammonia" refers to the compound having the formula NH3, formed by the chemical combination of nitrogen and hydrogen. Whenever the term "ammonia" appears in this RMPP, it should be understood as meaning anhydrous ammonia and not aqua ammonia, aqueous ammonia or ammonium hydroxide, which are solutions of ammonia in water. Ammonium hydroxide solutions generally range in concentrations of ammonia from about 30% down to the 2 to 4% found in household ammonia. These solutions are all commonly known as ammonia, but should not be confused with liquid anhydrous ammonia, which has a much greater hazard potential. "Anhydrous" means "free from water". Because of its physical properties, a release of liquid ammonia has a greater potential to cause serious injury than gaseous ammonia. Liquid ammonia released at a high rate can form a dense, ground hugging cloud of small liquid particles dispersed in air. A dense gas dispersion has the potential to move through surrounding areas. Ammonia vapors, lighter than air, rise quickly in the atmosphere and are less likely to cause serious injury. Ammonia vapors released into an unventilated area could reach high concentrations that present a risk to employees who enter the area unprotected. 11140010.002 7 Ammonia, a colorless gas with an extremely pungent odor, can be detected by smell at concentrations of 3.5 to 37 mg/m3 (5 to 53 parts per million). Ammonia is corrosive and irritating to the skin. High concentrations can cause dermal burns, inflammation and swelling of the eyes and can be temporarily blinding to exposed receptors. Levels of 500 mg/m3 (700 parts per million) can cause eye irritation. Coughing occurs at a level of 1,200 mg/m~ (1,700 parts per million). Exposure to higher concentrations can result in debilitating injury and death through pulmonary edema. Ammonia is not recognized as a carcinogen nor does it present a threat to the environment. If involved in a fire, a 16 percent to 25 percent ammonia mixture with air can explode. The following table, Physiological Effects of Ammonia Vapor, indicates human physiological response to various concentrations, in parts per million (ppm), of ammonia in air upon inhalation. PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF AMMONIA VAPOR EFFECT PPM AMMONIA IN AIR BY VOLUME Least perceptible odor 5 ppm Readily detectable 20-50 ppm No discomfort or impairment of health for prolonged exposure 50-100 ppm General discomfort and eye tearing] no lasting] effect on short exposure 150-200 ppm Severe irritation of eyes, ears, nose and throat; no lasting effect on short 400-700 ppm exposure Coughing, bronchial spasms 1,700 ppm Dangerous, less than 1/2 hour exposure may be fatal 2,000-3,000 ppm Serious edema, strangulation, asphyxia, rapidly fatal 5,000-10,000 ppm Immediately fatal over 10,000 ppm (From "Anhydrous Ammonia", Pamphlet G-2 Seventh Edition, Compressed Gas Association, Inc.) 11140010.002 8 VVZl INC V. AHM PROCESS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION A. General Ammonia Refrigeration Processes Mechanical refrigeration is, essentially, the process of lowering the temperature of a substance to below that of its surroundings for the purpose of heat extraction. At Kern Ice and Cold Storage, ammonia, the cooled substance, removes heat from both surrounding space and material substances contained within the facility's freezer and cooler rooms. Two pressures, high and Iow, are used to enable a continuous cooling process. Low pressure, heat ladened vapor is compressed raising its pressure level - and as a consequence, its temperature level as well. The compressed vapor is discharged to a condenser where heat is removed from the high pressure/temperature vapor through air circulation and cooling water. The reduction in temperature accompanied by the removal of heat from the vapor causes it to liquefy and flow to a receiver. The liquid refrigerant then flows to an expansion valve where pressure is reduced, thereby reducing its boiling point. The cooled ammonia moves to an evaporator where it absorbs heat from surrounding substances being cooled and boils to a vapor. Vaporized ammonia then flows to the compressor suction to complete the refrigeration cycle. B. Operation of the Ammonia System Exhibit 4 is a process flow diagram of the ammonia refrigeration system. The system is designed to run continuously and employs two types of cooling systems: flooded and vapor cooling. In the flooded system, liquid ammonia flows from the receiver to an accumulator with liquid ammonia level controls. From the accumulator, liquid ammonia flows through chiller coils and recold units stationed in each freezer room. As the liquid ammonia boils, it draws heat in from the room. In the cooler rooms, liquid ammonia is expanded into a gas by an expansion valve prior to entering the chiller coils. Vaporized ammonia in the coils 11140010.002 9 draws in heat from the rooms. When required, needed ammonia is added to the receiver from a Department of Transportation approved tanker truck. A hose is used to deliver ammonia from the tanker truck to the receiver. The receiver sight glass is constantly watched during delivery to ensure that the proper amount of ammonia is transferred into the system. The plant engineer supervises ammonia addition. 11140010.002 10 ~l~lZ ItNC VI. AHM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The following equipment makes up the ammonia refrigeration system at Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company. Each piece of equipment will be listed along with its nature, age and condition. Equipment: Compressor #2 Nature: Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Built in the 1940's. This equipment is used to compress ammonia vapors. It is vertically reciprocating, driven by a 60 horsepower electric motor. Worthington #VR-8C, 8 x 8 #L-48707 Well maintained, good condition. Equipment: Compressor #3 Nature: Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Built in the 1940's. This equipment is used to compress ammonia vapors. It is vertically reciprocating, driven by a 50 horsepower electric motor. Worthington #VR-8C, 8 x 8 #L-47328 Well maintained, good condition. 11140010.002 11 Equipment: Compressor #4 Nature; Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Built in the 1940's. This equipment is used to compress ammonia vapors. It is vertically reciprocating, driven by a 75 horsepower electric motor. Worthington #VR-9E, 9 x 9 #L-52479 Well maintained, good condition. Equipment: Compressor #5 Nature: Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Built in the 1950's. This compressor is used to compress ammonia vapors. It is an integral two compressor, vertically reciprocating, driven by a 200 horsepower electric motor. Vilter #440-VMC, Size 12 Unknown The compressor was rebuilt in 1991 and is in good condition. 11140010.002 12 Equipment: Worthington Ammonia Compressor #6 Nature: Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Built in the 1940's. This equipment is used to compress ammonia vapors. It is vertically reciprocating, driven by a 125 horsepower electric motor. Worthington #VR-10E, 10 x 10 #L-57479 Well maintained, good condition. Equipment: Vertical Oil Separator Nature: Age: Condition: This 12 3/4 inch O.D. by 8 feet seam to seam vertical oil separator removes oil from the high pressure ammonia vapor discharging from the compressors. Oil is drained from the separator for reuse in the compressors. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown Built in the 1940's. Good. 11140010.002 13 Equipment: Evaporative Condenser Nature: Age: Condition: This condenser cools the high pressure vapor ammonia to a liquid. Air and water flow through the condenser, evaporating and cooling ammonia flowing through small lines within the unit. Manufacturer: Baltimore Aircoil Model: Series 1500 Serial Number: Unknown Installed new in 1996. Excellent. Equipment: Vertical Purger Nature: Age: Condition: This McCarthy Steel Inc. purger vessel, 10 3/4 inch O.D. by 3 feet 8 inch seam to seam, vertical, purger vessel, removes air from the ammonia system. Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Installed in 1940's. Good. McCarthy Steel Inc. Unknown Unknown 11140010.002 14 Equipment: Ammonia Receiver Nature: Age: Condition: This is a high pressure horizontal steel vessel (4' diameter x 24' length), which has been manufactured to accept and store anhydrous ammonia. The vessel has been constructed to comply with Title 8 requirements and ASTM code. Maximum capacity: 2114 gallons Manufacturer: Roy E. Hanson Jr. Mfg. Equipment I.D.: Unknown Installed new in 1996. Excellent. Equipment: Ammonia Receiver Manual King Valve & Solenoid Operated King Valve Nature; Age: Condition: The solenoid valve controls liquid flow from the receiver to the accumulator and freezer and cooler rooms. The King Valve is manually operated, and the solenoid valve is automatically activated. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown NOTE: To close these valves, compressors must be shut down with discharge valves closed. Installed new in 1996. Excellent. 11140010.002 15 Equipment: Pre-cooler Nature: Age: Condition: This 24 inch O.D. by 7 feet 6 inch unit is used for heat transfer with the ammonia system. Liquid ammonia from the receiver travels through an internal coil and into the accumulator. Ammonia vapors from the freezer rooms' recold units return to the pre-cooler, and then pass to the compressors. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown Built in the 1940's. Good. Equipment: Accumulator Nature: Age: Condition: The 10 3/4 inch O.D. by 4 feet seam to seam, vertical vessel maintains the liquid ammonia level for freezer rooms' recold units. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown Installed in the 1940's. Good. 11140010.002 16 Equipment: Freezer Room Expansion Valve Nature: Age: Condition: The expansion valve opens, allowing liquid ammonia to flow through the recold unit, absorbing heat from the room. The ammonia vapors from the recold unit then return to the pre-cooler. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown Installed in the 1940's, solenoids replaced in 1990. Good. Equipment: Typical Freezer Room Nature: Age: Condition: The freezer room recold unit contains coils in which liquid ammonia absorbs heat from the room and vaporizes. An accumulator controls the liquid level in rooms 1 and 3, while another accumulator controls levels in rooms 2 and 4. The other freezer rooms, rooms 5 to 14, have a level vessel in each room. Liquid ammonia flows from receivers to the accumulator, past the expansion valve, through the recold unit, then back to the pre-cooler where ammonia vapor returns to the compressors. Installed in the 1940's, solenoid valves replaced in 1990. Good. 11140010.002 17 Equipment: Cooler Room Expansion Valve Nature: Age: Condition: The expansion valve opens, expanding the liquid ammonia to a vapor phase. The ammonia vapor flows through coils, absorbing heat from the room. The ammonia vapor from the cooler rooms flows back to the compressors. Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Unknown Unknown Unknown Installed in the 1940's, solenoids replaced in 1990. Good. Equipment: Typical Cooler Room Nature: Age: Condition: Rooms 15 through 34 are cooler rooms. The cooler room has an expansion valve controlled by a solenoid, and a series of coils. Liquid ammonia flows to the expansion valve, is expanded to a vapor, absorbs heat from the room, and is' piped back to the compressors. Installed in the 1940's. Good. Equipment: Gas/Liquid Separation Vessels Nature: Ammonia vapors returning from the freezer and cooler rooms enter these vessels allowing any remaining liquids to separate from the vapors, thereby preventing compressor damage. 11140010.002 18 Age: Condition: Manufacturer: Model: Serial Number: Unknown Good Unknown Unknown Unknown Equipment: Ammonia Lines Nature: Age: Condition: The ammonia lines carry the ammonia through the system. Most lines have been in service since the 1940's; some lines have been added as new equipment was added. Good. Equipment: Relief Valve Nature: Pressure Relief Setting: Age: Condition: Dual safety relief valves are connected to the Ammonia Receiver. These valves protect the system from high pressure. The Ammonia Receiver is located outdoors, with the relief valve mounted on the top of the unit approximately 7 feet above the ground. The valve is vented to the Evaporative Condenser. Manufacturer: Unknown Model: Unknown Serial Number: Unknown Unknown Installed in 1996. Good. 11140010.002 19 VII. AHM OPERATING PROCEDURES Written operating procedures providing clear instructions for safely conducting activities involving each AHM process are a necessary step towards an effective RMPP. It is important that written operating procedures be provided and adhered to by employees involved with AHM operations to ensure that these tasks and procedures are performed in a consistent and safe manner. Written operating procedures must be kept current by documenting any changes that occur in any of the processes. Any changes in written operating procedures involving AHM shall be communicated to all employees involved, and be documented in Section II, Revision Record of this RMPP. Written operating procedures that are readily available to employees and provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved with AHM processes are maintained at Kern Ice and Cold Storage and provided here in Appendix B. The procedures address start-up, normal operation, normal shutdown, temporary operations as the need arises, emergency operations including emergency shutdowns, and who may initiate these procedures for each operating phase. 11140010.002 20 VIII. AHM EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES A written program for regularly maintaining and inspecting the ongoing integrity of AHM process equipment reduces the chance of an AHM release due to equipment failure or malfunction. Kern Ice and Cold Storage has developed preventive maintenance and written inspection programs for AHM handling equipment. These programs include daily, monthly, and annual inspections and preventative maintenance checks. Written procedures are to be followed when repair, maintenance or service is being performed on certain AHM process equipment. A copy of maintenance checks performed on the ammonia equipment is provided in Appendix C. Maintenance records on the date and time of repair or service that was performed on the AHM equipment is maintained on file at Kern Ice and Cold Storage. 11140010.002 21 IX. AHM DETECTION, MONITORING AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS PLUS ADDITIONAL RISK REDUCTION MEASURES A. Detection and Monitoring Systems The nature of ammonia is such that the presence of its vapors would be detected by smell at very Iow concentrations. A significant release would likely be detected visually as well. Therefore, AHM releases will be primarily detected by employee sight and/or smell during daily operations and inspections. Additionally, an ammonia vapor detector is to be installed in the machinery room, where the compressor is located. The ammonia dector shall activate visual and audible alarms when ammonia vapor concentrations reach levels of one half the IDLH (250 ppm). The detection system is also connected to Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company's central alarm system which is monitored continuously, 24 hours per day. The central alarm system, when activated, is set up to contact Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company's on-call personnel, as well as the Bakersfield City Fire Department. This system meets the requirements of Article 63 of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. B. Automatic Control Systems The compressor High Pressure Shutdown device and Vibration/Motion Shutdown device are automatic shutdown controls with manual reset by the plant operator. If either of these devices actuate, the plant operator shall review the system before restarting the compressors. The engine room is also equipped with a continuous ventilation system which discharges to atmosphere. When high levels of ammonia vapors are detected by the ammonia monitor in the engine room, the ventilation system will automatically vent to the condenser 11140010.002 22 cooling water system, absorbing the ammonia vapors prior to reaching the atmosphere. The ammonia monitor will activate this system when ammonia levels reach one half the IDLH (250 ppm) or greater. This system meets the requirements of Article 63 of the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. The ammonia receiver is equipped with an excess flow valve as shown on the process flow diagram (Exhibit 4). In the event of a break in the liquid ammonia supply line, the excess flow valve is designed to stop the flow of liquid ammonia. The excess flow valve is estimated to activate when the flow of ammonia exceeds approximately 45 gallons per minute. C. Additional Risk Reduction Measures Additional measures taken at Kern Ice and Cold Storage to reduce or mitigate an AHM release or accident include: · Installation of traffic barriers around accessible areas of the ammonia receiver. Employees are trained to respond to AHM emergencies, Fire extinguishers are placed strategically throughout the office, shop, compressor room, warehouse and plant, · An emergency evacuation assembly point is established, Emergency CPR life saving procedures and general first aid training is completed by all personnel, and SCBA and other safety equipment training is completed by all employees. 11140010.002 23 X. AHM HAZARD ANALYSIS The Hazard Analysis is the cornerstone of an effective RMPP. The Hazard Analysis includes results of a Hazard and Operability Study which identifies the hazards associated with the handling of an AHM due to events which may present an AHM accident risk, such as: · operating error · equipment failure · facility siting · external events For the hazards identified in the Hazard and Operability Studies, offsite consequence analyses are performed for the most credible hazards assuming the most pessimistic situations and air dispersion modeling and other adverse environmental conditions. This includes a clearly prepared map noting the location of the facility and surrounding populations and the zones of vulnerability, including the pessimistic levels of exposure in each zone. The Hazard Analysis is contained in Appendix D. 11140010.002 24 Xl. AHM ACCIDENT/INCIDENT HISTORY, INVESTIGATION, RECURRENCE PREVENTION AND REPORTING PROCEDURES A. Accidents at this Location No reportable accidents involving acutely hazardous materials have occurred in the last three years. B. Accident/Incident Investigation and Recurrence Prevention Procedures After an accident has occurred, an ammonia incident report (Exhibit 5) shall be completed. A post accident review shall be held in which potential causes of the accident are discussed. When the cause of the accident has been determined, a method shall be developed to ensure that the accident will not recur. System design, operating and maintenance procedures that need updating or alteration shall be noted, and a time schedule set for implementation of improvements. C. Release Reporting Procedures Pursuant to Section 25507 of Chapter 6.95, Article 1 of the H&SC, releases of AHM that may threaten human life, health and safety or the environment must be reported. The Manager is responsible for determining the significance and reportability of a release. The Manager is also responsible for reporting a release. If an ammonia release exceeds 200 cubic feet during a 24-hour period, the event is reportable and the following agencies must be notified immediately. 11140010.002 25 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: (805) 326-3979 California Office of Emergency Services Telephone: (800) 852-7550 National Response Center Telephone: (800) 424-8802 D. Emergency Release Follow-Up Notice In addition to the verbal notification, a written follow-up report is required to be completed as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days following a release. The completed report is to be sent to the Office of Emergency Services. A form, approved by the Office of Emergency Services, is provided in Exhibit 6. This form, when filled out, reports follow- up information required by Section 25507 of Chapter 6.95, Article 1 of the H&SC and Title 42 United States Code, Section 11004. Instructions for filling out and mailing the form when complete is also provided in Exhibit 6. 11140010.002 26 Xll. FACILITY AHM EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS Emergencies involving the use of AHM can result in catastrophic consequences if not properly handled. For that reason, it is important that employees know what procedures to follow for emergency shutdowns, evacuation procudures and routes (Exhibit 7), emergency response notification, and for controlling the emergency at all times. A written Emergency Response Plan is an effective means of addressing emergency response and control. Kern Ice and Cold Storage's Emergency Response Plan is provided in Appendix E. 11140010.002 27 Xlll. RMPP AUDIT PROGRAM The RMPP Audit Program entails the use of a checklist to provide a method to confirm that the RMPP is being effectively implemented. A copy of the RMPP Audit Checklist employed at Kern Ice and Cold Storage is provided in Appendix F. This audit is conducted annually. Completion of the RMPP Audit Checklist can result in initiating action items such as establishing training programs and procedure reviews, including regular reviews of audit results to improve employee participation and implementation of the RMPP. A copy of each audit shall be kept onsite for a minimum of 5 years, including any action items generated. Other goals to be achieved by the ammonia safety audit are: To pinpoint, actual and potential safety hazards due to design, location, operation and maintenance of the ammonia system. To provide a means of objectively assessing and documenting plant safety. To provide a means of objectively defining needs for upgrading and modification. To provide feedback on safety issues. 11140010.002 28 XlV. MANAGEMENT OFCHANGE VVhen changes are being considered involving the technology of the process, as well as the facility, it is important to thoroughly evaluate the changes to assure that the impact on safety and health is analyzed. It is also important to determine if any modifications to operating procedures are necessary. Prior to implementing any changes to the AHM systems, Kern Ice and Cold Storage will establish written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, procedures, and facilities. The following issues will be addressed by the written procedures: Technical basis for the proposed change(s). Impact of the changes on health and safety. Modification of the operating procedures. Implementation schedule for the change. Authorization for the proposed change. Employees involved with affected processes will be informed of, and trained in the changes as early as practicable prior to startup of the process involved. Written operating procedures will be updated as needed. The Hazards Analysis will be amended to reflect the changes implemented, if necessary. 11140010.002 29 XV. RMPP RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL As required under Section 25534.(g) of Chapter 6.95 Article 1 of the H&SC, "The RMPP shall identify, by title, all personnel at the business who are responsible for carrying out the specific elements of the RMPP and their respective responsibilities, and the RMPP shall include a detailed training program to ensure that those persons are able to implement the RMPP." All personnel who are onsite at the Kern Ice and Cold Storage facility have certain responsibilities to effectively implement this RMPP. The following list outlines the various elements of the RMPP and personnel responsible for implementing these elements. RMPP ELEMENT PERSONNEL RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION Plant Manager Plant Engineer AHM emergency response and notification Including, but not limited to: · AHM vapor cloud release · AHM liquid release Understand AHM hazards, systems, operating procedures and daily equipment inspections Accident/incident livesti~]ation documentation Perform AHM equipment inspection and preventive maintenance AccidentJlinvesfigation recurrence preventative Implementation Ensure all personnel have received required training Perform RMPP audit Changes to AHM equipment and/or process-revise RMPP Update RMPP every three years Maintain RMPP records Review RMPP audit results Plant Engineer Plant Manager Plant Engineer Plant Engineer 11140010.002 30 XVI. RMPP TRAINING PROGRAM Effective training programs are necessary to ensure that all plant personnel can successfully implement the elements of this RMPP. Training will be able to provide a continuity of safety despite employee turnover. Training ensures that plans and programs such as emergency evacuation plans will work as designed when they are needed. The following subjects will be covered by the training program: Use of Safety Equipment Ammonia First Aid Procedures Review of Material Safety Data Sheets, Chemical Hazards Fire Prevention Response Release Reporting (Section 2.5) Evacuation Procedures (Section 8.1) Earthquake Procedures (Section 8.3) Spill Containment and Dilution Procedures (Section 8.4) Daily Operating Procedures (Section 4.1) Maintenance Procedures (Section 4.2) Training is verified by testing employees for comprehension of the training programs developed for the elements of the RMPP that need ongoing implementation. Included in Appendix G is a master checklist documenting the date and type of training received by each employee working at the facility. 11140010.002 31 XVll. RMPP SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS The following schedule lists target dates or frequency for accomplishment of each element and/or requirement of the RMPP: Element Target Date * Notice for public comment September 1996 * End public comment period November 1996 * Install guard rails May 1997 * Install and test ammonia monitor and June 1997 exhaust vent control system * Perform RMPP audit-checklist July, 1997 Training complete for AHM emergency response and notification procedures Ongoing (complete with change in personnel) Facility equipment/procedures modification Update RMPP Within 60 days of modification Update RMPP Minimum every 3 years (1999) 11140010.002 32 XVlll. AHM VENDOR AND CONTRACTOR PROGRAM When selecting a vendor or contractor to service, repair or perform maintenance on or adjacent to a process which uses AHM, the contractor's safety performance and programs will be obtained and reviewed. Kern Ice and Cold Storage will familiarize the contractor with the inherent hazards of the work area by requiring the contractor to visit the work site with a qualified plant representative prior to the commencement of work. Contractors shall be informed of any applicable safety rules of the facility. 11140010.002 33 XIX. LOCKOUT/TAGOUT PROCEDURES As necessary, certain AHM equipment will require Lockout and/or Tagout for isolation during inspection, maintenance and/or repair. All plant personnel, vendors and contractors are required to abide by Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company lockout procedures. 11140010.002 34 XX. HOT WORK OPERATION PROGRAM Kern Ice and Cold Storage has developed and implemented procedures for the issuance of "hot work" permits. Hot work is defined as electric or gas welding, cutting, brazing or any extreme heat, flame, or spark producing procedures or operations. The permit, which is kept on file until completion of the hot works operation, shall indicate the date(s) authorized for hot work, identify equipment to which hot work will be done, and shall certify that the applicable portions of the fire prevention and protection requirements contained in CCR, Sections 48488 and 6777, have been implemented prior to beginning hot work operations. 11140010.002 35 XXI. RMPP RECORD KEEPING As required under Section 25534(f) of Chapter 6.95, Article 2 of the H&SC, Kern Ice and Cold Storage "shall maintain all records concerning the RMPP for a period of at least five years." The following elements of the RMPP require written records which are to be maintained for a minimum period of 5 years: · · · · · · AHM deliveries - dates and amounts (Section IV), Changes in AHM processes and/or equipment (Section V, VI and XlV), Changes in AHM operating and maintenance procedures (Section VII, VIII and XlV), Preventive maintenance and AHM equipment inspection documentation (Section VIII), Changes in AHM monitoring and automatic control systems (Section IX and XlV), Revisions to the consequence analysis (Section X), AHM accident/incident reports (Section Xl), AHM accident/incident recurrence prevention implementation (XI), Changes in emergency response and notification plans (Section Xll), RMPP audit documentation (Section Xlll), and Training and safety meeting documentation (Section XV). 11140010.002 36 W~I ~nC 'XXII. QUALIFICATIONS OF CERTIFIERS Qualified Person Mary Jane Wilson, President, WZI Inc. Ms. Wilson received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering from Stanford University in 1972. She is registered as an Environmental Assessor in California. Ms. Wilson is the President and Chief Executive Officer of WZI Inc. She monitors WZI Inc. projects to maintain technical standards. She has extensive experience (over 24 years total) in the petroleum and environmental consulting industries. She has participated in the design of numerous compliance programs related to the environmental safety of operating facilities. Richard Dixon, Plant Engineer Mr. Dixon has been with Kern Ice and Cold Storage since November, 1989. He oversees operations and maintenance of the ammonia system. Mr. Dixon is a certified welder and has received refrigeration training. He was maintenance supervisor for Excel Mineral for seven years. 11140010.002 37 XXlII. RMPP CERTIFICATION Section 25534 (j) of the CHSC requires that the RMPP and any revisions be certified as complete by a qualified person and the facility operator. Section 25532 of the CHSC defines a qualified person as "a person who is qualified to attest at a minimum, to the validity of the hazard and operability studies performed pursuant to Section 25534, and the relationship between the corrective steps taken by the handler following the hazard and operability studies and those hazards which were identified in the studies". Qualifications of the certified person, Mary Jane Wilson, and the plant engineer, Richard Dixon, are contained in Section XXII of this RMPP. I hereby certify that this RMPP is complete, that the hazard and operability studies performed on the behalf of Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company are valid and that programs included in this RMPP will mitigate potential hazards determined through the hazard and operability study. ' .~~ 'J~an~Vil"~n Expiration Date: June 30, 1@@7 Richard Dixon Plant Engineer Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company 11140010.002 38 H KERN GOLF ¢OU~ I i ..t · ! [ KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE 120 30th STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. T.305. R.26r= -- -- GREENFIELD I T.32S. R.2~E. T. 12N:...I~,~2W. T.32S. R.2?E. [T.12N. R. tgW. '"~, ~"d'~.. ~t~s "'---- WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE LOCATION MAP DATE 12/90 1114.0010A I ROOM 16 ROOM 14 "\ ROOM 13 .... ........ 90 '--" .~ T STATION .. REVISED 4/91 #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 LEGEND FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE FACIL~Y DIAGRAM " ' lu ...... "- " ~- ~ I- |~ ~_ ~ ~ ~.~0~'. .~~ ~um. ..~..nu.~; - ~ . ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ BAKERSFIELD [ ~neer V/llage~ . ~ ~ ~ -- MEMORIAL '. ~ ' ' ~ 5T ~ . I ' ~.~-'~t~TH .... ;~ ~ ~r ! ~TH a~°~ST~ ~ /o~ ~BEI --~r~~ ~ t~RD ST I ~ ~RD 3T / ~ ~ ~ ~ 5I' . ST ~ : '. '--..--''6'~~ L ! ~ . PACIFIC ~TH ~ '~ ~ ~w~~.. rH ST /~/ ~ ; i ~ ORE ~TH~ ~ ~ STI~ ........ __ ~ __ ~ .... . , I ~ ~' ':'~1 II z ~.~ , z ~REA ,,.. : o : ~ IJ ~ ~:: ~ ~ ' I~ O ~ ~,. KERN ICE & ; ~ ~ , S..LL~ I~ ~ ,. COL~STO.*~ ~ ~: ~-~ I~ --, ' ]~ AR~A k~/ . / : s,o, . ~LUMalNG ~ " ~; -SLEEP' i ~ ~ ~ ,. ] ~ NAm ;~ ,< ..... ~ ~,o,~ ~1 - STATE 178 SLEEP- NAIR CROAD  WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE MAP OF SURROUNDING AREA REVISED 4/91 DATE 12/90 I 1114.0010A IEXHIBIT 3 I I · 4,' ROOM 28 ROOM 27 .... .~..~ ROOM20 .OOU 9---pJ; ROOM 18 ~ ROOM 17 ,-- ~ I ; T ====~=__-= I: .. .I / ROOM16 '~ ROOMIS -"~-- ROOM 14 ROOM 13 ROOM 12 ROOM 11 · - ROOM 10 ROOM 9 ,,..',: ~ ROOM 8 ~; ROOM 7 · ? ROOM 6 ~; ROOM5 .~ ~'" ~: ~ :~_~ ~ ~' ROOM 1 '_ _ _1 T T .... #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 LEGEND FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE EVACUATION ROUTES DATE 7~96 11114.0010 IEXHIBIT 7 AMMONIA COMPRESSORS SUCTION ~-~ 2 ~ ~SCHARGE SUCTION DISCHARGE OIL SEPARATOR KNOCKOUT VESSELS TYPICAL I FREEZER ROOM I RECOLD~__L .OW PRESSURE RETURN [LIQUID .~ I ACCUMU LATO R .--- ,,...1_,/ HIGH PRESSURE RETURN EXPANSI~ I TYPICAL COOLER ROOM VAPOR EVAPORATIVE CONDENSER PRECOOLER KING VALVE (SOLENOID OPERATED) KING VALVE (MANUALLY OPERATED)~ MMONIA RECEI!~ s VALVE EMERGENCY DIFFUSION TANK TO COMPRESSOR SUCTION HEADER PURGE VESSEL AMMONIA INCIDENT REPORT FACILITY: DATE OF INCIDENT: TIME OF INCIDENT: SEVERITY OF INCIDENT: VERY SERIOUS SERIOUS LOW THREAT Caused evacuation of the plant or neighbors, or serious injury, and required the use of SCBA (self contained breathing apparatus) to contaia. Caused injury and or damage to property and required the use of SCBA (self contained breathing apparatus) to contain. Required breathing equipment but caused no injury or damage. LOCATION IN FACTORY: SOURCE OF DISCHARGE (TYPE OF EQUIPMENT) COMPONENT OR ITEM DISCHARGING (SUCH AS SEAL, VALVE, WELD...) CAUSE OF DISCHARGE: AMMONIA INCIDENT REPORT PAGE 1 EXHIBIT 5 1114.0010 ACTIVITY AT TIME OF DISCHARGE: DETAILS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE: DEGREE OF CONTROL LOW MODERATE EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY PLAN LOW DEFICIENCIES IN THE EMERGENCY PLAN: HIGH MODERATE HIGH CONSEQUENCES OF DISCHARGE: NUMBER OF PEOPLE HURT NUMBER HOSPITALIZED EVACUATION: IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE AREA ENTIRE FACILITY (Y/N) NEIGHBORS ~ (Y/N) ESTIMATED COST OF INCIDENT: EMPLOYEES OTHERS EMPLOYEES OTHERS ~ (Y/N) PROBABLE RECURRENCE OF INCIDENT: LOW MODERATE HIGH FULL DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT (INCLUDING RELEVANT EVENTS LEADING TO THE INCIDENT; ACTS, FAILURES TO ACT AND/OR CONDITIONS THAT CONTRIBUTED DIRECTLY TO THE INCIDENT; WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN TO CONTROL THE INCIDENT; WHAT REMEDIAL ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO PREVENT A RECURRENCE. AMMONIA INCIDENT REPORT PAGE 2 EXHIBIT 5 1114.0010 § 27(}5 BARCLAYS CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS Title 19 c EM~ERGEaNCY RELEASE FOLLOW-UP NOTICE REPORTING FORM BUSLNESS NAME I FACIL[TYEMERGENCYCONTACT& PHONE NUMBER CHECK IF CHEMICAL IS LISTED IN CHECK IF RELEASE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION aO CFR 355. APPENDIX A [] :- UNDER al U.S.C. § 9603(a) [] [] w^TER [] O,HER DAYS HOURS __ Ml2q UTES ACTIONS TAKEN E K.XOWN OR ANTICIFATED HEALTH EFFECTS (U~ u~¢ comments s~cfion for additional information) [] ACL-I'E OR IMMEDIATE (exptain~ [] CHRONIC OR DELAYED (explaim [] NOT KNOWN (expl~im ADVICE REGARDING .MEDICAL ATTENTION NECESSARY FOR EXPOSED INDIVIDU.M.S COMMENTS INDICATE SECTION (A-Gl AND ITEM WITH COMMENTS OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CERTIFICATION: I hereby ceftiN, under penalty of law ~hat I l'~v¢ personally examined and I am familiar with the information ~bmitted and believe the submitted information is u'ue. accurate, and complete. REPORTING FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE (print or SIGNATURE OF REPORTL~G FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE DATE Page 120 EXHIBIT 6 N~. I~.-I~ 5-10-96 Title 19 Office of Emergency Ser¥ice~ § 2705 EMERGENCY RELEASE FOLLOW-UP NOTICE REPORTING FORM INSTRUCTIONS G ENER.-~L INFOI~MATION: Chapter 6.95 of Division 20 of the California Health and Sa.t'ety Code requires that v. Titten emergency release follow-up notices pre- ....~--~ """~, ......... .... "~ 42 U.S.C. § !,r~a, ~, ,,.~'~ ~.~,,~;,,~,~.,~,,,,,,,,,.~ ,,~;,, .- ,~,;~ ~,,,,...,.. ~,,~ , ,.vcrtm~;" tcrm.' Non-pe,,-mit~ed ~' ....... ..... .,.~,t' ~,.,.,-,,-, ~.,.~v.,,,...,,,. ...... ,~.-,,.,,,.o';';~ 0f Ex- tremely Hazard. s Substances (listed in 40 CFR 355. appendix A) or of chemicals that require release reporting under section 103(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. and Liability Act of 1980 [42 U.S.C. § 9603(a)] must be reported on the form. as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days. following a release. The written follow-up report is required in addition to the verbal notification. BASIC INSTRUCTIONS: · The form. when filled out. reports follow-up infcrrnation required by 42 U.S.C § 11004. Ensure that all information requested by the fcrrn is provided as completely as possible. · If the incident involves reportable releases of more than one chemical, prepare one report form for each chemical released. · If the incident involves a series of separate releases of chemical(s) at different times, the releases should be reported on separate reporting forms. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS: Block A: Enter the name of the business and the name and phone number of a contact person who can provide detailed facility infof marion concerning the release. Block B: Enter the date of the incident and the time that verbal notil'ication was made to dES. The dES control number is provided to the caller by dES at the time verbal noti/'icafion is made. Enter this control number in the space provided. Block C: Provide information pertaining to the lccation where the release cccurred. Include the street address, the city or community. the county and the zip code. Block D: Provide infcrrnation concerning the specil'ic chemical that was released. Include the chemical or trade name and the Chemi- cal Abstract Service (CAS) number. Check all categories that apply. Provide best available information on quantity, time and duratiou of the release. Block E: Indicate all actions tal<en to respond to and contain the release as specified in 42 U.S.C. § 11004¢). Block F: Check the categories that apply to the health effects that cccurred or could result from the release. Provide an explanation or description of the effects in the space provided. Use Btcck H for additional comments/information il'necessary to meet requirements specified in 42 U.S.C. § 1 I004(c). Block G: Include information on the type of medical attention required for exposure to the chemical released. Indicate when and how this infcrrnation was made available to individuals exposed and to medical personnel, ii' appropriate for the incident, as specii'ied in 42 U.S.C. § I I004(c). Block H: List any additional pertinent information. Block I: Print or type the name of the facility representative submitting the report. Include the official si~ature and the date that the form was prepared. MAIL THE COMPLETED REPORT TO: Chemical Emergency Planning and Response Commission (CEPRC) Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) Attn: Section 304 Reports 2800 Meadowview Road Sacramento; CA 95832 NOTE: Authority. cited: Sections 25503. 25503. I and 9-5507.1. Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 25503(b}(4}. 25503.1. 25507.1. 25518 and 25520. Health and SafeR Code. HISTORY: 1. New section filed 9-20-9~. operative 10-20-90 (Register 90. No. 45}. Page 121 -EXHIBIT 6 MEETING AREA ROOM 34 ROOM 33 · ",' ROOM 32 ';' ROOM 30 ROOM 31 '". F~OOM 29 ROOM 28 ROOM 27 ,-',.. '~' ROOM 26 ROOM 25 ROOM 23 ..... · 7. ROOM 24 ROOM 22 ROOM 21 ROOM 20 ROOM 19 ": ROOM 18 ROOM 17 ,-'- ROOM 16 ROOM 15 ~" ROOM 14 ROOM 13 ROOM 12 ROOM 11 T · ': ROOM 10 ROOM ~ ROOM 8 ~ ROOM .OOM ": ROOM4 ~ RCC~ _r-.~.. AMMONIA -- ..... DIFFUSION. ;30 ~ 3 T STATION #1 TO 14 #15 TO 34 LEGEND FREEZER ROOMS COOLER ROOMS WZI INC. BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE EVACUATION ROUTES DATE 7/96 11114.0010,1EXHIBIT 7 I APPENDIX A Hazardous Materials Business Plan CITY qf B,qA'ERSFI£LD · '.~f'£"C. [RE" KEI~N ICE & COLD STCP~AGE CO~SPANY { t3'De or 5rin% Jessie ~;. Daugh%r¥ name) ce--4 ~" that I have reviewed r.h... RECEIVED JAN 2 z~ 1989 ,~s'~ attached Hazardous Haterials business KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE COMPANY name of businessl and that it along with the attached additions : er czrrect.±ons constitute a complete and correct Business Plan for my facility. January tO, 1989 , ~iaUe LOCFiTiON IZ~ 3~,'),r~ $'f N..'~H HAZP~RD R~'FING Z O. EMPLOYEE N(Y~'IFICfiTigN / CuA{[I~MFION I_RST CHANGE IZ/Z3/87 BY EVRMC SEC Z) PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM - INTERCOM VOCAL ALBRM LEAVE BY NE~RESI' O00R OFFICE FORCE ANO PERSONNEL USE GAS MASKS CALL E. MITIOATION / PREVENTION /"RBRTEMENT " LAST CHANGE IZ/Z3/8T BY EVRMC SEC 1) MAINTAIN SYSTEM OPERATING PRESSURES'AT SAFE LEVELS, OPERATE MATERIAL HANOLING EQUZPI~'NT UrTH CRF~ NEAR"S~TEM COMPONENTS PAGE 4 'TZ/'20/'BB MATERIAL SAFETY'DATA SYSTEMS, [NC. (8~S) B.¢8~8~3'''' NORTH (CH~¢~ OXE) SITE D [AGRA3! FACILITY DIAGRAM , t I(rnspec~:b~" s .Commemc$): -OFFICIAL USE ONLY- - 5A - ~ORTH sc.~.~:,,o.~ ~t;s;:~ss x~,,~kERN ICE~COLD STG'~°~'~: ~ ~? ~ FACILITY D [AGRA3{ ~' ..i 1 ! I7 f -OFF[¢[AE USE OXLY- %: ,9 5A - F C3 ~YI ~5 (C~ECX ONE) SITE ~ IAGRAM FACILITY .I rnspec~oF's Commencs): -OFFICIAL USE ONLY- NORTH ~.~-:: ~.' ,,/r~ F,~c::.r'r¥ '~'~'~:WAREHOUSE ~=r:' -':Z ~ "/ FAC. ii. ITY D[AGRAM ~' . · lC 1' ~ PI~IlN'~, ,.~.HOP -- $6E ~t/ inspec=oF's Comments): -OFFICIAL USE ONLY- - 5A - OFF'iCE f~CF I~GE I~ATED FLL~ WAREHOUSE .]( Ins?ecl:or' s Comments): -OFFICIAL USE ONLY- - 5A H'iG?I H.~,iF, F~O R~TTNI:; ',.' R. 0uER~qLL H~'Z.~F{DOU5 l'l~.£Ei~,[F!l..5 t.F~S'F CHANGE ~J1/lg/8~ 8Y EuAi'IC TYPE ',' c' .. ~,n:. Mt'~:< AMT UNiT HAZARD LOC:-; i"! ON LfiN'rA ! , ,,~:~ F USE f PURE ANHYDROUS r:JMl'l(JN[r'l 13B~")~ FT3 'rHROUGHOUI' FAC I L ['rY [ N PROC .' MILCH t N~Y COOL I NG tO PE[~CENT COMPONEN~ S MODERATE H~ZRR9 LIST MODERATE ED PURE LUBE OIL NW CORNER COMPRESSOR ID PERCENT COMPONENTS ZB05~0~ IG~...O MOTOR OIL 300 GAL DRUMS OR BARRELS MET.. LUBRICANT UNKNOWN HAZARD LIST UNKNOWN WASTE LUBE OIL/WATER WEST OF COMPRESSOR ROOM ID PERCENT COMPONENTS lABS.AG 1(~3.0 URSTE OIL Z~ GAL DRUMS OR BARRELS MET.. LUBRICANT UNKNOWN HAZARO LIST UNKNOWN WASTE LUBE OIL/WATER WEST OF COMPRESSOR ROOM ID PERCENT COMPONENTS 1SgB.~ 1~.0 WASTE OIL 50 GAL UNKNOWN DRUMS OR BARRELS MET.. OIL TREATMENT HAZARD LIST UNKNOWN B. FIRE PROTECTION / WATER SUPPLIES LR~T','CHRNGE IZ,'Z3/8? BY EVAMC SEC 4) 12 - ABC 10'EXTINGUISHERS Z - ABC S EXTINGUISHERS ' ' I - OXYGEN EXTINGUISHER : ' 14 - 1 I/Z" HOSE WITH NOZZELS. REE£S I -' SCOTT AIR P~CK SEC S) FIRE HYDRANT SW CORNER OF LOT ON 30TH ST PAGE 3 MATERIAL SAFETY ORTR SYSTEMS, INt.-. (805) G4.8-G8~XZ) 12120/88 1Z :0'7 We are w~king with the n~cessary authorities, Health, and Fire .Denartment in otter to acco .m~..lish a oroper training program for all em~_ loyees, and personnel at %his plan*.. .',e ha~ al:.;ays m%~u%ained a sa~'ety ~.d health program for our employees in regard to haza=dous ma%eriaZs. LOCAL EMERGENCY MEDtCRL' RSSi'STRNC~ LAST'CHANGE 12/Z3187 BY EVAMC 2A SEC S) MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 420 34TH ST 3Z?-17BZ ANY CONVENIENT E~ERGENCY MEDICAL FACILITY PAGE Z MATERIAL SAFETY ~TR SYSTEMS, [NC'. [gOS) G48-G88Q 1Z/ZO/88 1Z:O? i . OVEhVt .$UF:I 5 EOBE LHST EHRN('.:,E iZ/Z3/~,? BY · a:;r~£1..D STaTiON ¢)4 (.;RIO i90 ~:F~C~L_rT'f' Ul~l['F~ i HRz~RrD E~I'ING Z RESPONSE SUMMARY ZR 5E6 4.) JESS E, RUGHTHY - r~RNRGER LEON 5'FRNFIELD-- pt.~NT.EI, IGIN%ER G~RY .JOHNSON - FOREMAN EMER6ENCY CONTRCTS JESS DRUTHTRY ~Z4-~9~1 OR 589-Z577 LEON STRNFiELB UTILITY SHUTOFFS 585-ZS77 1-536-~ 831-9373 a) GRS - BETWEEN COMPRESSOR aNB OFFICE BUILDING B) ELECTRICAL - INSIDE COM- PRESSOR ROOM - SW CORNER C) WATER - EaST OF FIRE HYDRANT O) S4=ECIAL - NONE E) LOCK BOX - NO Z. NOTIFICATION / PUBLIC EVaCUaTION LaST CHANGE 7 /1 /81BY Approximately 8 years ago we were installing an ev~porater when the crane operator dropped the unit on a 1%2" amonia line causing a small rupture and a sma11 amount cf amonia evaporated. We do not hav~ any knowledge of any additional Ammonia (Anhydrous) leakage, or loss. < NO INFORMATION REUOROED FOR TRIS'SECTION > We have adequate gas mask for all personnel, and hav~ begun safety traLuln~ for employees at this plant. We appreciate the coopera%icn by the Fire Department, and other authorities who hav~ worked with us in order to achie~ our safety program. PaGE I 1Z/ZO/88 IZ:O~ MATERIAL SAFETY DaTA S¥S~MS, INC. (805) 848-GB(2X~ I ALS' I NVI~ N'I'U {~¥ P P M W-2: P 'p 2 300 ^111111^1o AMI)till I' 135,.000 hO0 200 5o 100 · l.t I'1;! lit ¥ ' IUf I1'^1. 3oo 50 200 100- 200 OHltGIt llAH£t CIT¥,ZlPf FACII, ITY UNIT J .... U tl I T II A H !-,: WARI~[OgSR I;IIII'I'^I:T: I't~III'^CT: IlllS I PIIOIIE ! t '7 I,(I(:^TI(IN III TIII6 FACILITy tlNIT Thru-out facility N W Corner Compressor ~ o ~ I~y 100 FAUII, ITY Jt)FF I I:l Al. USE t)IILY g CII£HIt;AL Oil CUHHUtl Anhydrous Ammonia (NH3) HAME CF I II.q J 1! ~:~NA Lube Oil CMLQ OIIATUII£ t A [: T ! V I T Y: ....COT.~ STOR3_G~ - Il^ ' __~_. ~,, 0,, ~ , ,.,J 9 ,,,,,,, g.. ~?.~-z n~o/k__~ ~.. 6FTE~ BUS. II~S: ~ ..... T I TLS t ~MAHAGER T ! TI, F, ~~,~ O LEON STANFIELD - T ! T I, £ I _ENO _INEER W. of Compressor Rm 99 Lube Oil Water CMLQ W. of Compressor Rm 50 '. Lube Oil Water CMLQ Middle of Maint. Shop 100 Oxygen OXID " " " " 100 ~cetylene FLGS CITY oj KERSFIELD N O N -- 'J' !~ A I.) i-2 S i-. C I~ I_'2 '1' -~ a partnership ,~ ..1.. o~ .2... .usf.[$s NaM£: Kern Ice & Cold Storage Co. o.~t~ ~a~: Arno~ K~sche~ NA.~ Or T~S F3~ILiT~:~amO aS busin~a~ ~OCAT]O.:_ 'l~O-30th S~reet~ A~D.ZSS: F"'0 Box 22 A, STA.D~RD I.D. C~SS CODZ~C.28110-28160 .,~O.Z ,: 32~-1911, '322~6h9-, P.onz .: 3662,)26? ' '- BBB of Babe~~~ ~._ - , ~,' ~ ~,,~ ~,~ c.~.s. ~_ 7~G-h~7 ~ ,~ ~ s c.,.s. ~ :~ ,n ,~, ~; Tit~ 3-01 - : ~ture of Nitrogen ~n~ tly~ogen, .... _ ~. ~ ~ c.~.s. ~ densgd by co~ and press~e,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~-~. ~ motors, low carb~ c~ten~.) ~ltk Of ~ ~ltk ............. .~K, ~,~,s ,, ~ON ST~FIE~ ENGIN~ 1-536-8508 . JESS DkUOHI~Y, ~NAGF~ n~2h-1911 Res589-257? ' ,lassie W DaughLry, l'hnagor ~~j~~l~/~. J~u~y 23, 1989 N ('~ N '--: '1' I:t A I) !.-] ~ !~ (7 il lg '1' ~ A co-par[ne~ship "q' .~.. 0' .~. Kern Ice & Co~ S[orage Co. OWNER Sa~g: Arno~ Kirschonm~ s~,t OF T~ lAbILITY: Sa~ aS buo~t2~s~ ,.OC^TIU-: IZU-3U%I~ St,., aODR'~SS: P 0 Box 23 A. S?aSOAnO I,O. cnass cooE]ec.281102281601 .......... )ress~e equivalent ~o a pressure or - -- r-- r--~ -- C~t I1 h I C.l.S. ~ ~tl Irk ol Prfl ~vre ~l It h APPENDIX B Operating Procedures Kern Ice and Cold Storage OPeratinq Procedures Daily Operatin,q Duties Inspect work area and overall system operation. Check suction temperature and pressure twice per day. Average temperature 15°F to 25°F and average pressure 10 to 15 psig on the Iow side and 20 to 35 psig on the high side. Check discharge temperature and pressure twice per day. Average temperature 275°F and average pressure 90 to 120 psig. Check oil levels in compressors twice per day. Check oil pressures in compressors twice per day. Average pressure 25 to 35 psig. Ammonia System Shutdown 2. 3. 4. Shut suction valves on compressors Shut King Valve on receiver to pump all ammonia into the receivers Turn compressor motor off Shut compressor discharge valves Restartinq a Compressor 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Disconnect bleed off hose Open discharge valve at compressor Check oil level in crankcase Turn on compressor motor Check oil pressure Open suction valve at the compressor Compressor is back on line APPENDIX C Maintenance Procedures Kern Ice and Cold Storage Maintenance Procedures Addition of Oil to the Compressors 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Close suction valve Open crankcase valve Allow compressor to develop a suction in the crankcase Allow suction to pull oil into the compressor When finished, the crankcase valve is closed Open the suction valve Compressor is back in operation Draininq Oil from the Separators Open valve and drain oil into a container When liquid ammonia is mixing with oil the oil becomes cloudy, operator watches closely and closes valve at that time Isolating a compressor for Maintenance 2. 3 4. Shut suction valve, allow compressor to pump down (remove ammonia) Turn compressor motor off Close discharge valve Hook bleed off hose to the crankcase to bleed off excess ammonia into a bucket of water Inspect work area and overall system operation Check suction temperature and pressure twice per day. Average temperature 15° F to 25'~ F and average pressure 10 to 15 psig on the Iow side and 20 to 35 psig on the high side. Check discharge temperature and pressure twice per day. Average temperature 275" F and ave.rage pressure 90 to 120 psig. Check oil levels in compressors twice per day Check oil pressures in compressors twice per day. Average pressure 25to 35 psig Date Compressor #2 KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE CO. COMPRESSORS DAILY MAINTENANCE & INSPECTION LOG Time By. Oil Level Packing Water Valves Compressor #3 Oil Level Packing Water Valves )ressor #4 Oil Level Packing Water Valves Compressor #5 Oil Level Packing Water Valves Compressor #6 Oil Level Packing Water Valves See Reverse for comments, if any. KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE CO. TEMPERATURES Date Time Taken By ROOM ROOM NO. NO. 1-3 19 2-4 20 5 21 6 22 7 23 8 24 9 25 10 26 11 27 12 28 13 29 14 30 15 31 16 32 17 33 18 34 ~m iNC APPENDIX D WZl ,.c. APPENDIX D KERN ICE AND COLD STORAGE COMPANY HAZARD ANALYSIS December 1990 Revised April 1991 Revised July 1996 Submitted to: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division 1715 Chaster Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Submitted by: WZI Inc. 4700 Stockdale Highway, Suite 120 Bakersfield, California 93309 11140010.003 4700 STOCKDALE HIGHWAY, SUITE 120 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 (805) 326-1112 FAX: (805) 326-0191 4100 WESTHEIMER, SUITE 231 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (713) 877-1149 FAX: (713) 877-1923 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa.qe 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION ...................................... 4 2.1 Anhydrous Ammonia ........................................ 4 2.1.1 Identification of AHM .................................. 4 2.1.2 Location of AHM ...................................... 4 2.1.3 Quantity of AHM ...................................... 4 2.1.4 Nature of Hazards .................................... 4 HAZARD AND OPERABILITY (HazOp) STUDY GUIDELINE .............. 9 3.1 Normal Operation of the Ammonia System ...................... 12 HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY RESULTS ...................... 13 4.1 Anhydrous Ammonia Summary ............................... 13 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS ...................................... 15 5.1 Anhydrous Ammonia ....................................... 16 5.1.1 Summary of Modeling Results .......................... 16 5.1.2 Receptor Locations .................................. 17 5.1.3 Essential Service Facilities ............................. 17 RISK ANALYSIS ............................................... 19 6.1 Likelihood of a Release Occurring ............................ 19 7.0 REFERENCES ................................................. 21 TABLE D-1 EXHIBIT D-1 EXHIBIT D-2 EXHIBIT D-3 EXHIBIT D-4 EXHIBIT D-5 APPENDIX D-I APPENDIX D-II APPENDIX D-III APPENDIX D-IV TABLE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ANHYDROUS AMMONIA EXHIBITS RISK ANALYSIS MATRIX CASE #1 MAP OF EXPOSURE ZONE - IDLH & LOC CASE #2 MAP OF EXPOSURE ZONE - IDLH & LOC MAP OF NEIGHBORING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS LIST OF NEIGHBORING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS APPENDICES ANHYDROUS AMMONIA MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY FORMS PROCESS FLOW AND PIPING DIAGRAMS ARCHIE COMPUTER MODELING RESULTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company, located at the intersection of Union Avenue and Thirtieth Street in the City of Bakersfield, operates a warehouse consisting of cold storage rooms. Customers pay Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company for use of the rooms. Anhydrous ammonia, an Acutely Hazardous Material (AHM), is used as a refrigerant to cool the storage rooms to desired temperatures. Due to the quantity of this AHM, a Hazards Analysis has been prepared in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency/Federal Emergency Management Agencies/United States Department of Transportation (USEPA/FEMA/USDOT) document "Technical Guidance for Hazards Analysis: Emergency Planning for Extremely Hazardous Substance, 1987." This Hazards Analysis has been prepared as part of a Risk Management and Prevention Plan (RMPP) and is a necessary step in the comprehensive emergency planning for the Kern Ice and Cold Storage facility, its employees and the surrounding community. Comprehensive planning depends upon a clear understanding of what hazards exist and what risk they may pose for employees and various members of the community. The analysis represents a means of evaluating potential hazards resulting from the accidental release of an AHM. The three basic components in the Hazards Analysis are (1) hazard identification, (2) vulnerability analysis, and (3) risk analysis. 11140010.003 1 Hazard Identification The hazard identification process focuses on collecting information pertaining to: · Type and quantity of hazardous materials used and stored at the facility. Physical location of hazardous materials used and stored within the facility. Potential hazards associated with hazardous material releases. Conditions of operation, storage, loading, processing, and using hazardous materials (Hazard and Operability Study). Transportation routes and methods used for transporting hazardous materials. Vulnerability Analysis The vulnerability analysis provides information helpful in planning requirements that include: · An estimation of the vulnerable zone with air dispersion modeling using AHM concentrations that represent the Immediate Danger to Life and Health (IDLH) and the EPA Level of Concern (LOC) along with the conditions and assumptions that are used to estimate each vulnerable zone. 11140010.003 2 The population, in terms of numbers and types (e.g., neighborhood residents, high density transient populations such as stadiums or auditoriums; sensitive populations in hospitals, schools, nursing homes and day care centers) that could be expected to be within the vulnerable zones. Essential service facilities such as hospitals, police and fire stations, emergency response centers, and communication facilities. Risk Analysis The risk analysis provides a relative measure of the likelihood and severity of various possible hazardous events. A risk analysis matrix (Exhibit D-l) is used as guidance for putting each potential situation into perspective in terms of the probability that it will occur and the resulting effects it will have, and addresses the most likely and most severe potential hazards. 11140010.003 3 2.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Anhydrous Ammonia 2.1.1 Identification of AHM Anhydrous ammonia is used at the Kern Ice and Cold Storage facility. No other acutely hazardous materials are stored in reportable quantities. 2.1.2 Location of AHM The ammonia in use at Kern Ice and Cold Storage is contained in the ammonia refrigeration system. No other ammonia is Used or stored at the plant. Exhibit 3 of the RMPP is a facility diagram which shows the location of the ammonia refrigeration system. 2.1.3 Quantity of AHM The ammonia receiver to the south and outside of the ammonia compressor room contains a maximum of 6,200 pounds of ammonia. The ammonia is delivered to the plant by tanker truck. 2.1.4 Nature of Hazards The term "anhydrous ammonia" refers to the compound having the formula NH3, formed by the chemical combination of nitrogen and hydrogen. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for anhydrous ammonia is contained in Appendix D-I. Whenever the term "ammonia" appears in this Hazards Analysis it should be understood as meaning anhydrous ammonia and not aqua ammonia, aqueous ammonia or ammonium hydroxide, which are solutions of ammonia in water. Ammonium hydroxide solutions generally range in concentrations of ammonia from about 30% down to the 2 to 4% found in household ammonia. These solutions are all commonly known as ammonia, but should not be 11140010.003 4 confused with liquid anhydrous ammonia, which has a much greater hazard potential. "Anhydrous" means "free from water". The physical properties of ammonia are provided in Table D-1. At room temperature and atmospheric pressure, ammonia is a pungent, colorless gas approximately 40% lighter than air. Compressed and cooled, ammonia gas condenses to a colorless liquid about 68% as heavy as water. At atmospheric pressure, the liquid boils at -28°F. 1 ) Primary Hazards Ammonia acts as an irritant to human tissue in varying degrees depending upon concentration and exposure. The pungent and distinctive odor of the vapor, even at Iow concentrations (20 - 50 ppm), provides adequate warning so that no person will voluntarily remain in concentrations which are hazardous. Ammonia is not a cumulative metabolic poison; ammonia ions are actually important constituents of living systems. Depending upon concentration and time, the effects of exposure to ammonia vapor vary from none or only mild irritation, to obstruction of breathing from laryngeal and bronchial spasm, to edema and severe damage of the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract with possible fatal results. Exposure levels of ammonia vapor which are tolerated by some persons may produce adverse reactions to others. The following table, Physiological Effects of Ammonia Vapor, indicates human physiological response to various concentrations, in parts per million (ppm), of ammonia in air upon inhalation. 11140010.003 5 PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF AMMONIA VAPOR EFFECT PPM AMMONIA IN AIR BY VOLUME Least perceptible odor 5 ppm Readily detectable 20-50 ppm No discomfort or impairment of health for prolonged exposure 50-100 ppm General discomfort and eye tearing no lasting effect on short exposure 150-200 ppm Severe irritation of eyes, ears, nose and throat; no lasting effect on short 400-700 ppm exposure Coughing, bronchial spasms 1,700 ppm Dangerous, less than 112 hour, exposure may be fatal 2,000-3,000 ppm Serious edema, strangulation, asphyxia, rapidly fatal 5,000-10,000 ppm Immediately fatal over 10,000 ppm Reference: "Anhydrous Ammonia", Pamphlet G-2 Seventh Edition, Compressed Gas Association, Inc. The RMPP Guidelines issued by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division recommend using AHM concentrations in completing air dispersion modeling which is representative of the Immediate Danger to Life and Health (IDLH) and the EPA Level of Concern (LOC). The IDLH is the maximum concentration of a chemical from which a healthy adult male should not suffer any irreversible health effects from exposures of up to 30 minutes. IDLH levels are set by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). IDLH is defined as "conditions that pose an immediate threat to life and health, or conditions that place an immediate threat of severe exposure to contaminants which are likely to have adverse cumulative or delayed effects on health." The LOC is equal to one tenth of the IDLH. 11140010.003 6 For use in this Hazards Analysis, the following ammonia concentrations will be used for: LOC = 50 ppm IDLH = 500 ppm 2) Other Hazards a) Liquid ammonia boils at -28°F under atmospheric conditions, acting as a refrigerant to remove heat from any warmer object it may be contacting. Accordingly, liquid ammonia in contact with the skin can cause frostbite. b) Liquid ammonia exhibits a high coefficient of cubical expansion. A given quantity of liquid ammonia therefore expands considerably in volume with increases in temperature, as shown in the following table: VAPOR PRESSURE AND VOLUME OF LIQUID AMMONIA AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES VAPOR TEMPERATURE PRESSURE VOLUME DEGREES F PSlG GAL/CWT -28 0.0 17.57 0 15.7 18.10 30 45.0 18.72 60 92.9 19.43 90 165.9 20.25 115 251.5 21.04 130 315.6 21.58 Reference: U.S. Bureau of Standards Circular No. 142 11140010.003 7 For this reason, appropriate measures must be taken to avoid hydrostatic rupture of containers, piping or other equipment as could be caused by such expansion. c) Ammonia vapor, although classified by the U.S. Department of Transportation as a nonflammable gas, will ignite in the presence of a flame or spark, but only within the limited range of 16-25% of ammonia in air by volume. The heat generated by combustion is insufficient to maintain a flame which therefore will extinguish upon ignition source removal. 11140010.003 8 3.0 HAZARD AND OPERABILITY (HazOp) STUDY GUIDELINE A HazOp study is used to identify potential hazard and operability problems associated with AHM. The primary objective of the HazOp study is the identification of problems. Possible solutions to problems may be discussed and recorded during the study. This HazOp study focused on the following system: Ammonia Refrigeration System. A HazOp team was assembled to review, in a series of meetings, the design and operation of the above systems using a guide word HazOp format. A HazOp team was made up of the following three people with their respective areas of experience: Team Leader: Gary M. Fuller, Manager, WZI Inc., is a Mechanical Engineer who has over fifteen years of experience in managing large manufacturing facilities. His expertise includes operations management, process development control, environmental control, quality assurance and engineering. Mr. Fuller has performed hazard analyses, consequence analyses and implemented hazard communications programs at manufacturing facilities in both the San Joaquin Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area. Additionally, he has expedited hazards and operability studies for other facilities, including those with ammonia storage within the City of Bakersfield. Team Member: Richard Dixon, Ammonia Operations and Maintenance Engineer, has been with Kern Ice and Cold Storage since November 1989. He oversees operations and maintenance of the ammonia system and is very knowledgeable of the ammonia system and details of its operation. Additionally, Mr. Dixon is responsible for and performs all 11140010.003 9 W~I ~nC maintenance on the ammonia system. Mr. Dixon is a certified welder and has received refrigeration training. He was maintenance supervisor for Excel Mineral for seven years. Team Member: Fred Woody, Staff Engineer, WZl Inc., has four years experience in major industry and as formally educated at Stanford University, receiving his Masters Degree in Petroleum Engineering. Mr. Woody participated in and had responsibility in conducting the consequence analysis and performing a human error analysis as described in the Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, AICHE, 1985. The team focused on specific points of the design (called "study nodes") one at a time. At each of these study nodes, deviations in the process parameters were examined using the guide words. The intention of how the systems are expected to operate during each specified deviation at each study node was examined. Deviations or departures from the intention of the normal or expected operation were reviewed in the study nodes by systematically applying the guide words (e.g. "no pressure", "high pressure", etc.) to the process and design parameters. Also investigated in the study nodes were the causes or reasons why these deviations might occur, and if they were meaningful. These causes would be hardware failures, human errors, external disruptions (e.g. loss of power, earthquake), etc. The consequences of the deviations, should they occur, were also reviewed. Trivial consequences relative to the study objective were dropped. 11140010.003 10 The "guide words" used in the study nodes are simple words used to identify, qualify and quantify possible deviations. The following guide words were used in the HazOp study: Guide Word Example No Power Shutoff Less Low FIowrate More High Temperature Part of Partial Power Shutoff As Well As Water Added to NH3 Reverse Flow in Wrong Direction Other Than Earthquake Conditions Meaninq Negation of Design Intent Quantitative Decrease Quantitative Increase Quantitative Decrease Quantitative Increase Logical Opposite of the Intent Substitution from Design Human error analysis was also included in the HazOp study and applied to the study nodes. The purpose of the human error analysis is to identify potential human errors and their effects. Causes of human errors that have occurred in the past may also be identified. Potential areas for operator/human error included: inadvertent closing or opening any valve improper or neglected maintenance accidental damage caused by forklift operator improper operation of control system improper procedures during filling The HazOp forms used in the study nodes are provided in Appendix D-II. Shown on these forms were the guide words used with the possible deviations, including human errors, along with the causes and consequences of such deviations. Select Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID's) and process flow diagrams used for the HazOp study are provided in Appendix D-III. 11140010.003 11 3.1 Normal Operation of the Ammonia System The ammonia system employed at Kern Ice and Cold Storage was sectioned into study nodes as follows: Study Node # 1.01 2.01 3.01 4.01 5.01 6.00 7.00 Equipment Compressors High Pressure Ammonia Vessels Freezer Rooms Cooler Rooms Gas/Liquid Separation Loading of Ammonia Receiver Fire' Department Emergency Refrigerant Control Box with Sparge System The ammonia refrigeration system is designed to operate continuously. Gaseous ammonia enters the compressors and is compressed to a higher pressure and temperature. After exiting the compressors, the hot gas enters the oil separators and then to the evaporative condenser. Water and air flowing through the condenser cools the hot gas into a liquid. The liquid ammonia flows to and is collected in the receiver. From the receiver, liquid ammonia flows through the lines to the cooling equipment. Vaporized ammonia is then returned to the compressors to complete the cycle. Ammonia is also charged into the receiver from an approved tanker truck. A hose is used to deliver ammonia from the tanker to the receiver. The receiver sight glass is constantly watched during delivery to ensure that the proper amount of ammonia is transferred into the system. 11140010.003 12 4.0 HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY RESULTS 4.1 Anhydrous Ammonia Summary Each study node was reviewed for possible deviations from normal operation and potential consequences resulting from these events were recorded. The severity and probability of consequences was then rated. The results of these ratings for each possible deviation considered in the study nodes are recorded on the HazOp Forms provided in Appendix D-II. In summary, the greatest risk is presented by the release of a large quantity of liquid ammonia. Upon release to atmospheric pressure, liquid ammonia rapidly boils forming a two-phase dispersion cloud in which liquid ammonia becomes entrained in the evolved ammonia vapor. Whereas a single-phase (vapor only) ammonia release would quickly rise into the atmosphere (vapor density of ammonia is 0.59 that of air), the two-phase release forms a dense fog that can hug the ground, potentially inflicting injury upon receptors. For this reason, pure ammonia vapor releases were considered less severe than liquid ammonia releases. To determine the worst case credible release scenario for the refrigeration system, the HazOp study deviations were evaluated based on estimates of the relative probability of occurrence and magnitude of release. In the HazOp study all ammonia release events that were determined to have a high or medium severity rate were all considered to be Iow probability events. 11140010.003 13 With this understanding, the worst case credible release at Kern Ice and Cold Storage Company was considered to be a release of the contents of the ammonia receiver through partial rupture of a receiver line, even though it was rated as a Iow probability event. A partial rupture during an event such as an earthquake could release liquid ammonia to atmosphere at a rate which is not great enough to trigger the shutoff mechanism of the excess flow limiting valve installed in the tank. The excess flow valve on the liquid ammonia supply line is estimated at 45 gallons per minute (gpm). The other remaining pipelines connected to the receiver, such as the inlet to the vapor return line, is located in the tank's vapor space, and would result in a single phase vapor release. The liquid fill line is equipped with a check valve which prevents back flow from the tank through the fill line, so that only ammonia in the line would be released. Therefore, the maximum release rate for the ~,orst case credible release was determined to be 45 gpm from the partial rupture of the storage tank liquid ammonia supply line. Under this scenario, the quantity of ammonia released is limited by the time required to detect and stop the release. A complete hose rupture or pipe failure resulting from a significant seismic event would result in an initially high release rate of ammonia until the shutoff mechanism of the flow limiting valve closed. In addition, the ammonia supply line is equipped with a manual shutoff valve at the tank outlet. The probability of the event occurring was defined as Low. The severity of exposure to people was defined as High. Modeling was performed on this scenario to determine the effect on the surrounding area for Emergency Response Planning in the unlikely event of its occurrence. 11140010.003 14 5.0 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS Vulnerable zones for the worst case credible release of ammonia were estimated using air dispersion modeling. The Automated Resource for Chemical Hazard Incident Evaluation (ARCHIE) computer program was used to model the releases, using the Handbook of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures (FEMA, DO T and U.S. EPA, 1989) as a guideline. The ARCHIE program offers a number of hazard assessment modeling options. Option a, "Estimate Discharge Rate of Liquid or Gas", was used to model the release of AHMs from storage tanks. Option d, "Evaluate Toxic Vapor Dispersion Hazards", was used to model the dispersion hazard of the potential release of the AHM into the atmosphere. The ARCHIE computer program recommends that hazard evaluations for emergency purposes should strive to assume the worst reasonable and credible conditions. Thus, the following, most pessimistic atmospheric conditions were chosen for modeling purposes. Atmospheric Stability Class F Generally considered the most hazardous atmospheric condition for toxic gas releases. The stability of Class F results in minimal dispersion of the potential ammonia release and will occur only at night. Windspeed - 4.5 mph Low windspeed results in longer fumigation times and further downwind distances. Windspeed for Class F conditions ranges from 4.5 to 6.7 mph. 11140010.003 15 Ambient Temperature = 70°F Class F conditions occur at nighttime. The warmest nighttime temperature for Bakersfield is about 70°F (July). In addition to the most pessimistic nighttime atmospheric conditions, modeling was also performed assuming the most probable daytime conditions. The following depicts the daytime atmospheric conditions chosen for modeling purposes. Atmospheric Stability Class B Windspeed 6.4 mph Ambient Temperature 77.7 ° F 5.1 Anhydrous Ammonia 5.1.1 Summary of Modeling Results A summary of the modeling results for the worst case credible release of ammonia is tabulated below, followed by a brief synopsis of each case. A computer generated hard copy of the model input and output data files are attached in Appendix D-IV. Atmospheric Amount Radius of Arrival Radius Arrival Stability of IDLH Time to of Time to Case Class Ammonia (miles) IDLH LOC LOC Number released Radius (Miles) (Minutes) (minutes) 1 F (nighttime) 6200 1.01 13.5 5.14 68.5 2 B (daytime) 6200 0.13 1.2 0.4 3.8 IDLH = 500 ppm and LOC = 50 ppm 11140010.003 16 W~I Case 1' Represents a worst case partial hose rupture or pipe failure from the ammonia tank filled with 6,200 pounds of ammonia, assuming worst case nighttime atmospheric conditions. Results are plotted in Exhibit D-2. Case 2: Represents a worst case partial hose rupture or pipe failure from the ammonia tank filled with 6,200 pounds of ammonia, assuming most probable daytime atmospheric conditions. Results are plotted in Exhibit D-3. 5.1.2 Receptor Locations Neighboring receptors surrounding the Kern Ice and Cold Storage facility are provided in Exhibit D-4 and are listed in Exhibit D-5. EPA/FEMA guidelines indicate that decisions about evacuation are incident specific and are to be made at the time of actual release. An estimated vulnerable zone should not automatically be used as the basis for evacuation during emergency response. 5.1.3 Essential Service Facilities The fire station nearest to the Kern Ice and Cold Storage building is: Fire Station Number 4 130 Bernard Street Bakersfield, California 11140010.003 17 ~INZI INC Hospitals in the area are: Bakersfield Memorial Hospital 420 34th Street Bakersfield, California 11140010.003 18 6.0 RISK ANALYSIS 6.1 Likelihood of a Release Occurring The ammonia system at the Kern Ice and Cold Storage plant has been in operation for more than fifty years. Over that time, one significant release occurred when a pressure relief valve released ammonia after too much ammonia was added to the system. Risk of release is reduced through training and supervision at the facility. In addition, the pressure release valves are now vented to a water cooled condenser as a scrubbing control device. The Hazard and Operability Study determined that the probability of a minor release was ranked Medium and could occur during maintenance procedures (bleeding down lines) or when the compressors have shut down (seals may leak). This occurrence was also rated to have a Low severity rating. No scenarios were identified in the Hazard and Operability Study that had a Medium or High probability ranking with a Medium or High severity ranking. 11140010.003 19 A summary of the onsite and offsite consequences analysis are as follows: SCENARIO PROBABILITY ONSITE OFFSITE COMMENTS CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE 1) Partial hose Low High High · Worst Case rupture or Credible pipe failure Release 2) Complete or Low High High · Excess flow pipe hose valve to limit rupture release failure 3) Complete Low High High · Excess flow valve failure valve to limit release 4) Partial valve Low Low Low · Low quantity failure pipe release corrosion · Odor good warning properties for small leaks 5) Vandalism Low High High · Excess flow valves limit release · Perimeter fencing 6) Ammonia Medium Low Low · PRV activates overfill · PRV Outlet Controlled · Supervision 7) Worn · Preventative compressor Medium Low Low Maintenance seals, NH3 · Low vapor concentrations · NH3 monitor with control and alarms From the HazOp study, there were no High or Medium consequence ammonia release scenarios that were considered a High or Medium probability. Therefore, the partial rupture or pipe failure of a liquid ammonia supply line from the storage tank was considered to be the worst case credible release. 11140010.003 20 7.0 REFERENCES Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1985. Technical Guidance for Hazard Analysis: Emergency Planning for Extremely Hazardous Substances, USEPNFEMNUSDOT, Washington, D.C., December, 1987. Hazardous Materials Emergency Planning Guide, National Response Team, Washington, D.C., March, 1987. Handbook of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures, FEMA/USDOT/USEPA, Washington, D.C. Guidance for the Preparation of a Risk Management and Prevention Program, California Office of Emergency Services, 1989. Klaassen, Curtis D., Amdur, Mary O. and John Doull, Casarett and Doull's Toxicology, Third Edition, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1986. Sax, N. Irving and Richard J. Lewis, Sr., Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Seventh Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989. Lewis, Richard J., Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Twelfth Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993. Risk Management and Prevention Guidelines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division, Form FD 1593. 11140010.003 21 TABLE D-1 TABLE D-1 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ANHYDROUS AMMONIA (NH3) Molecular Weight Latent Heat 327 Boiling Point -28.03 Solubility 89.9 Specific Gravity (Liquid) 0.682 Vapor Density 0.59 Autoignition Temperature 651 Explosive Limits 16 to 25 Critical Temperature 651 Critical Pressure 11.5 IDLH 350 LOC 35 STEL 25 Ratio of Specific Heats 1.31 1 ppm 0.7 17.03 Lbm/Lbmole Calorie/Gram oF Gl100 mi AT 0 °C (-33.35 °C/4 °C) (AIR=l) @ 25 °C, 760 mm Hg °C (1,204 °F) % by Volume in Air oC ATM mg/m3 (500 ppm) mg/m3 (50 ppm) mg/m3 (35 ppm) mg/m3 @ 25 °C and 760 mm Hg The molecular structure of ammonia is composed of one nitrogen (N) and three hydrogen (H) atoms. The molecular weight of ammonia, 17 Ib/Ibmole, is significantly less than that of air which is approximately 29 Ib/Ibmole. As a result, ammonia in the vapor phase is much lighter than air and rapidly rises when released. 11140010.003 EXHIBITS (APPENDIX D) RISK, AaNALYSIS MATRIX LOW MEDIUM HIGH Combinations ot Conclusions From Risk Analysis that Identify Situations of Major Concern Combinations that Identify Skuations of Considerable Concern Severity of Consequences Due to AHM Release Combinations o[ Concern Which. may Require Planning for Credible Events (From RM'PP Guidance for the Preoaratiou of a Risk Manazcmeut and Pr,wention Prouam, November, 1989, California Off]ce of Emergency Services.) LOW: MEDIUM: I-IIGH: QUALITATIVE DEFINITIONS OF PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE ?robab~iity bf occurrence confidered unlikely during the erpected l~etim¢ o[ the fac~ a~amin~ no~al operatio~ and ma~tenance. Probab~' o~ o~u~en~ co,Meted ~ssible dung the e~ec;~d ~et~e of th~ fac~. Probab~ of occu~ence co~demd ~c~ent~ ~gh to a~mc ~vent'~I1 ~c~ du~ the e~ected ~et~e o[ the fac~ LOW: MED[U'M: HIGH: DEFINITIONS OF SEVERITY OF CONSEQUENCES TO PEOPLE Chemical is exl)ected to move into the surrounding environment La negligible concentrations. Injuries e~pected ~.nly for exposure over ertended periods or when Ladi¼dual permnal health conditions create complications. Chemical is expected to move ~to the surrounding environment La concentrations sufficient to cause ~crious Laiuries and/or deaths ufless prompt and effective corrective action is taken. Death. and/or hajuries expected only for g~6sure over emended periods or when ha~ddual persoeal health conditions created complications. Chemical is e~ected to move into the su~ounding environment La concentrations sufficient to cau..~ s~rious injuries ancot deaths upon e~osure. Large numbers of people e~ect:d to be affected. (From the EPA Technical Guidance for Hazard Analvsis, 198'7) -Form FD 1593 EXHIBIT D - 1 1114.0010 ~drr' orris Rd. Imperial ~,L STAT )LLEGE Rd. MEADOWS 3 FIELD Olive ~ : , ". Shd~:k FRN ~IV£1~ .... OIL.. FI ; " OUr? F.d ;::.~ q,: ...... :' %H L 290. :-: ~ Ch Wa G rad'e LooO Norri~" ~ Rd. c~. KERN ICE l '-- I COLD STORAGE !} ' iVING -'-' EUM'C Downing 22L~ '.':;'.: Bern _--,..-. x :: .: n,cj.w yU:-~"-':a- "':':"-.'. :. -: ..... ~--' ~ :"" '.-- '- St. ~ Niles u. ~oneer Dr' Belie ghway errace 4 Lom. AIR.. ,: B'AKERSFI IsDn '"c r...Ai R pA BAK i!:;. White Ln. ,,.-.* ~.~..,, ..--..~ 4~ ' '" .... eco ~'% ~": · o? ~.,. .. '" ".'~--: .... -r/ Harris Fairview -c~;:".'~ ''~ .2,'2 r'r' ,.-.:<~. _ ~ rr'- La'fie ;; 0 0 Miles 2mi. 4mi. 6mi. 0 Kilometers 5km 1Okra WZI INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE MAP OF EXPOSURE ZONE IDLH & LOC CASE #1 NIGHTTIME CONDITIONS DATE 7196 I 1114.0010 IEXHISlTD . 2 ~drr' o Rd. , e~ · EEN O EADOW s -...? Ye ning 2.?.L '....~: Highv¢zay R d. ": ": ighway AL STATE )LLEGE ' Belle 0.13 Mi. son i~:~ White .6: r~_, ; ',.: , · ..... '"' :"' -5 Harris er'.'-.~,.,z r,r '- P~"dam Norri~ "': Shu'~:k Tt~h ~F_.F~N ~IVE~ · .. OIL FIELD /~'0 L/~ Di ~.:o~'c:'.,' SH L 290. Chin~a Grad'e Loop " Rd. ?.; KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE CALIF.! LIVING MUSEUM'~ · ..,. ..--: ,, ,,,,.,., ~ :."~ ;:;:. .'. ,... .................. .-"CD '~ St. Niles ~ B rO'hd ~oneer Dr'. :'! ?':. errace ~ ': B'AKERSFIELD r.',AI R PA R K .~. BAKERSFIELD · - ~':?: .... :. 4 FARM ~ '"'"" P~heco ,-. ....... Fairv,ew [ ~ '~1 ::~"'~ = L a'fie ~ ~:,'t~.. '2;:::..' ....... 0 Miles 2mi. 4mi. 6mi. 0 Kilometers 5km lGkm WZI INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE MAP OF EXPOSURE ZONE IDLH & LOC CASE #2 DAYTIME CONDITIONS DATE 7/96 I 1114.0010 IEXHIBITD-3 MINTER, V!L. LAGE: _Burbank Avenue HAGGERTY =NORTH KERN-GOL Road KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE 120 30th STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA. Round Mtn. T.28S. B.2SE, 1616; ~5 2 KERN RIV~ ~OL~CgO~ ~'17.,'18', i OIL FIELO '~ 'anal E ~13 32 33 (ersflald I'ane OLD RIVER ~ar Mtn. Rd~. Bear Mountain d. J BAS FIELD PANAMA -- --jif-- ~;AIRPARK 1i : BAKERSFIEf D MLJNI~IPAL !5 T.30S. R.28E 2~j 27 i26 GREENFIELDI 4 DiGion ' Weedpatch 1'66p 17 '~ent ~ ~ 23 Mountain 27 i'6 ~ 25 ~. 35 $,6 2 talnvlew DI REC.i ~REA ~ WZl INC. BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE NEIGHBORING RECEPTORS OATE 7/96 J 1114.0010 JEXHIBIT D-4 Receptor EXHIBIT D-5 Approximate Distance (Miles) Distance 1. Bakersfield Memorial Hospital 2. Kernview Hospital 3. CBC Cancer Center 4. Longfellow School 5. Fire Station #4 6. San Joaquin Community Hospital 7. Bakersfield College 8. Kern Medical Center 9. East Bakersfield High 10. Garces High School 11. Sierra Junior High 12 Virginia Avenue School 13. Hort School 14. Carden School 15. College Heights School 16. Chipman Junior High 17. Highland High School 18. Eissler School 19. Noble School 20. Washington Junior High 21. Jefferson High School 22. Williams High School 23. Fremont School 24. Owens School 25. Special Services School 26. Vernon School 27. Casa Loma School 28. Revival Tabernacle Christian Academy 29. Mountain View Junior High 30. Fairfax School 31. Reg. OccuPational Ag. Center School 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/8 1/4 1 1 1 1 5/8 31/8 35/8 43/4 5 37/8 33/4 37/8 33/4 1 3/8 1 1/2 1 1 5/8 21/8 1 5/8 1 1/4 21/2 31/4 83/4 81/2 5 33/8 NW NW NW NE NE SW NE SW SW N SE SE SE SE NE NE NE NE NE NE SE SE SE SE SE SE S S SE SE SE 11140010.005 1 EXHIBIT D-5 (Continued) Receptor Approximate Distance (Miles) Distance 32. Pioneer Drive School 33. Compton Junior High 34. Harding School 35. Bakersfield Advanced Academy 36. Nichols School 37. Fire Station #1 38. Bakersfield Christian Life School 39. BLM Caliente Res. Area Office 40. Norris Elementary 41. Norris Junior High 42. US Border Patrol 43. Fruitvale Junior High 44. Greenacres School 45. Stockdale Christian School 46. Harris School 47. Fire Station #3 48. Fire Station #1 49. Quailwood School 50. St. Phillips School 51. Stockdale Elementary 52. Post Office 53. St. John's School 54. West High 55. Munsey Elementary 56. Fire Station #7 57. Stine School 58. Thompson Junior High 59. Sandrini School 60. Panama Unified School District 61. Actis Junior High 62. Castle School 4 3 3 21/2 2 3/4 1/4 3 3/4 2 7/8 6 3/8 6 3/8 2 7/8 51/2 51/2 3 3/8 2 3/4 2 3/4 1 1/8 4 3/4 4 3/4 51/2 4 41/4 4 3/8 31/2 4 4 5/8 5 3/8 51/4 8 3/4 5 5 3/8 SE E E E NE SW NW SW NW NW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW 11140010.005 2 EXHIBIT D-5 (Continued) Receptor Approximate Distance (Miles) Distance 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70, 71. 72. 73. 74. Library Laurelglen School Fire Station ~9 District School Cai State University Olive Knoll School North Rosedale School Rosedale School Rosedale School District Curran Junior High Horace Mann School Friends School 5 1/4 SW 6 1/8 SW 6 1/4 SW 7 1/2 SW 6 SW 4 112 NW 6 7/8 W 7 3/4 W 7 3/4 SW 3 3/4 SW 2 3/4 NE 5 5/8 SW 11140010.005 3 APPENDIX D-I AMMONIA MSDS ALPNAC.,J~ DIVISION .... ALPH'AGAZ : Specialty Gas Material Safety Data Sheet LIOUIO AIR CORPORATION One Calllornia Plaza, Suite 350 2121 N. California Blvd. Walnut Creek, California 94596 ISSUE DATE OCTOBER 1. 1gas AND REVISIONS CORPORATE SAFETY DEPT. I~ROOUCT NAME Nnmoni a TELEPHONE (415) 977-6500 EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION ON PAGE TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS AITIITIoni a, Anhydrous Ammonia CHEMICAL NAME AND SYNONYMS A~oni a, Anhydrous Ammonia FORMU~ MOLECULAR WEIGHT NH3 17.0 CAS NUMBER 7564-4t-7 CHEMICAL FAMILY ~i tr-ogen hydride HEALTH HAZARD DATA TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXPOSURE LIMIT 25 Molar PPM; STEL : 35 Molar .PPM (ACGIH, '1984-85) ; 50 Molar PPM (OSI~k, 1985) SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE Corrosive and irritating to the skin, eyes, upper respiratory system and all mucosal tissue. Depending on the concentration inhaled, it may oause burning sensations, oughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, headache, nausea, with eventual collapse. ld concentrations of vapor will cause dermatitis or conjunctivitis. Higher ;ncentrations of vapor or liquid contact will cause caustic-like dermal burns and inflammation and swelling of the eyes with possible loss of vision. Rapidly evaporating liquid contacting dermal tissue or the eyes will cause cryogenic "burns." TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES 'Inhalation: Affects the upper airway (larynx and bronchi) by causing caustic-like burning resulting in edema and chemical pneumonitis. If it enters the deep lung, pulmonary edema will result. Toxic level exposure to dermal tissue causes caustic.like burns and skin lesions resulting in early necrosis end scarring. Burns to the eye result in lesions and possible loss of vision. Cryogenic "burns" are like frostbite with a change in skin color to gray or white possibly followe, d by blistering. Listed as Carcinogen National Toxicology Yes [] I.A.~.C. Yes [] OSHA Yes or Potential Carcinogen Program No x~ Monographs No ~ No · ~?.CDMI~:ENDED FIRST AID TREATMENT PRC;.IPT MEDICAL ATTENTION IS MANDATORY ;H ALL CASES OF OVSREXPOSURE TO ~J.~O,.,[A. ~55C~E PE~SOHNEL SHOULD BE EQUIPPED W~TH SELF-CONTA[HED BREATH[HG APPARATUS AHD BE CCG;t[ZANT OF EXTREHE FIRE AND EXPLOS[O;'.I HAZARD· inhalation: Conscious persons should be assisted to an uncontaminated area and inhale fresh air. Unconscious persons should be moved to an uncontaminated area and given · :.eud.-~o-mouth r~suscitation and', .9~=~ '- . :... Keep the victim wa~ and -u~a~. q~su:'e that mucus or vomited material does net obstruct the ~irway by pcsitional (Continued on last.pa~e.) .... .. . ..... . , :-.....,. · '-." ..... ':I;..?' ..... .... !, ~'-' ' ' '' ' ~ 'r · ;,.. An~non~a is flammable over a relatively narrow range in ar . It re'acts vig0'~0'Usly ~.';J with fluorine, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen bromide, nitrosyl chloride, ' ~ chromyl chloride,"trioxygen difluoride, nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen trichloride. PHYSICAL DATA LIQUID DENSITY AT BOLLING POINT 42.6 lb/ft3 (682.'kg/m BOLLING POINT -2B.14°F (-33.41°C) V*,ORPRESSURE L~ 70°F (21.1°C) : 128 psia (883 kPa) SOLUBILITY IN WATER Very soluble, liberatinq heat APPEARANCE AND ODOR Colorless g~ with a pu~ent odor. FL~SN POINT (METHOD USED) ~INGU,S.~NG MEQI^ SPECb&L FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES GAS DENSITY AT 70'F 1 aim .0442 lb/ft3 (.708 kq/m3) FREEZING POINT -107.9°F (-77.74°C) Specific gravity .eT0~F {Air : 1,0) FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA j xut'o IGNmON T£MPERATunE j FLAMMABLe: LIMITS % BY ¥OLUME !274°F (6900Cl LEL : !5 UEL : 27 lE, ~CTnlCXL CU~SSIFICATION If possible, stop the flow of gas. Since ansonia is soluble in water, it is the best extinguishing media -- not only extinguishing the fire, but also absorbing (Continued on last UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HA~.ARDS The minimum ignition energy for a~nonia is very high. It is approximately 500 · amm~times greater than the energy required for igniting hydrocarbons and 1000 to · · ~ ~ ,d.~ ~. ~ · ,~ _-- ~. .~ REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY CONDITIONS TO AVOID U~lable X Stable ~.~66s'~Co~osmo. ,,o~ucts Hydro~en a:. very h~h HA~RDOUS POLYMERI~ON CONDI~ONS TO AVOID Mar Will Not Olgur X SPILL OR LEAi( PROCEDURES STEPS TO -~E TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL :S RELF~ASED OR SPILL.~D · Evacuate all personnel from affected area. Use appropriate protective equipment. if leak is in user's equipment, be certain to purge piping with an inert gas prior to atse.?,pting.repairs. If leak is in container or container valve, contact the closest Liquid Air Corporation location. :VASTY...".IS;~CSAL :.iE?HO0 Co ~cr. ~:~e~.~.- .:o dispose of '.,;a~t~ or unused quantities. P, eturn in the sh!poino -,ont~i~--r oro~erlv labei.~d, :;,ith any valve outlet .~!ucs or cads secured :=nd valv c~c:ion c~= in r.,l~.-_,~: to Liquid Air Corporation fo)- proper disposal. For emereency s~osa(, conc-cct the c~osest Liquid ~"~ · .~,. Corporation location. "' . .... A'~ OR NIGHT ~-,..-'R.- ,"'Al.. ,__~ C?:.E ?;! T :--: .=_ ~ .:.-.T .,:.._ ..... ~..:. ~r.', ,t2.1--?2O0 '-': .' SPECIAL PROTECTION'iCh[FORMATION :- ' ' rRES~,~O~P,OTEC~ON~,,,'y~p*) Positive pressure ~r l~ne w~ ~'ask or b~eathing aop~ratus should be available for emergenc ~ENTI~ON · LOCAL~X~USr lO preven; accumu Hood with forced '. above the TWA · In accordance with electrical codes. PROTECTIVE GLOVES Plastic or rubber Page 3 ISPEC~L'" .-.i. ":". · OTHER EYE PROTECTION Safety goggles or glasses OT~HE.R PROTECTJYE ~EOUIPMENT · ' ,Safety shoes, safety shower, eyewash "fountain" .SI:;ECIAL PRECAUTIONS' 'SPECIAL LABELING INFORMATION 'DOT Shipping Name: Ammonia, Anhydrous (RQ 100/45.4) I.D. No.: UN 1005 DOT Shippina Label: Nonflammable Gas DOT Hazard Class: Nonflammable gas SPECIAL HANDLING RECOMMENDATIONS ~ Use only in well-ventilated areas. Valve protection caps must remain in place unless container is secured with valve outlet piped to use point. Do not drag, slide or rol.1 cylinders. Use a suitable hand truck for cylinder movement. Use a pressure reducing regulator when connecting cylinder to lower pressure (<500 psig) piping or systems. Do not heat cylinder by any means to increase the discharge rate of product from the cylinder. Use a check valve or trap in the discharge line to prevent hazardous back flow into the cylinder. For ad¢itional handling recommendations consult L'Air Liquide's Encyclopedin de Gaz or Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-~. STORAGE RECOMMENDATIONS ~otect cylinders from physical damage. Store in cool, dry, well-ventilated area of ~on-combustible construction away from heavily trafficked areas and elnergency exits. Do not allow the temperature where cylinders are stored to exceed 130F (54C). Cylinders should be stored upright and firmly secured to prevent falling or being knocked over. Full and empty cylinders should be segregated. Use a "first in-first out" inventory system to prevent full cylinders being stored for excessive periods of time. Post "No Smoking or'Open Flames" signs in the storage or use area. There Should be no sources of ignition in the storage or use area. For additional storage recommendations consult L'Air Lic:luide's Encyclopedia de Gaz or Compressed Gas AssociaYon Pamphlet P-1. SP,ECLAL PACKAGING RECOMMENDATIONS Gaseous or liquid anhydrous ammonia corrodes certain metals at ambient temperatures. Oxygen presence enhances the corrosion of ordinary or semi-alloy steels. The addition of water inhibits this enhancement. anhydrous ammonia systems scrupolously'dry. GTi-;ER RECC;aMc..,NDATION$ CR PRECAUTIONS Earth-ground and bond all lines and equipment associated with the ar~'aonia system. Electrical equipment should be non-sparking or explosion proof. Compressed gas ~,,'inders.~, shcu!d not be r-~filled exce;t by qualified producers of compressed gases. 'hir. ment of .= cemoressed cas cviinder wi~ich has not been filled by the owner or with (written) cen~en~ is ~ violation cf Federal Law ;mCrFR) ' LIQUID AIR CORPORATION . .. · :. : RECOh~ENDED FIRST AID TREATMENT: (Continued) Eye Contact: PERSONS WITH POTENTIAL EXPOSURE TO'AMMONIA SHOULD NOT WEAR CONTACT LENSES. Flush contaminated'eye(s) with copious quantities of water. Part eyelids to assure complete flushing. Continue for a minimum of 15 minutes. Skin Contact: Flush affected area with copious quantities of water. Remove affected clothing as rapidly as possible. Dermal Contact or Frostbite: Remove contaminated clothing and flush affected areas with lukewarm water. DO NOT USE HOT WATER. A physician should see the patient promptly if the cryogenic "burn" has resulted in blistering of the dermal surface or deep tissue freezing. SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: (Continued) the escaped a,~monia gas. Use water spray to cool surrounding containers. I APPENDIX D-II HAZOP STUDY FORMS HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM Study Nods: 2.01 Equipment: AMMONIA RECEIVER Drawing References: 3ulde Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a Severity Probabtl~ Controls In Place Proposed Mitigation Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures No Ammonia flow Closed valve to vessel None (compressors down) Low Low None None Ammonia flow Closed valve from vessel High pressure (compressors on) Mad Low Employee training None Ammonia flow Minor leak in system Release to ambient air (liquid ammonia) Low Mad Regular maintenance None Ammonia flow System shutdown for maintenance done Low Mad None None Power Condenser outage (short circuit) Ammonia pressuro and temperature increases, Low Low Sparge system, excess I~ow valve None activate pressure relief valve {PRV) in receiver Less Receiver PRV fails St~uctura ntegr ty Temperature Undersized I defective Corrosion Closed king valve, compressors on Increased friction in compressors High temperatures Ammonia overfill Possible line I vessel rapture Minor liquid ammonia leak Other I Earth movement I Earthquake . I Earth movement I Earthquake I Broken receiver sight glass I Sight glass accidentally hit I Failed sight glass check valve I Poor condition I failure I Location I Vossel crushed Receiver PRV will release Increased system pressure Receiver PRV release, vessel failure Receiver PRV release Broken lines to vessels Loss of power to system Check valves seal off ammonia flow Ammonia release Hit by forklift I truck Description of Equipment Operation: - 48" O.D. x 24' length x 0.432" thickness - SA-612 Carbon Steel Ammonia Storage Vessel · All pipe connections Schedule 80 · Maximum load to fill - 6,200 pounds IMed I Low I Regular maintenance, parts replacement procedures Low I Low I Non-corrosive ammonia I oil mixture, rourine inspection I I None None Low Mad Employee training, operating procedures Low Low Regular maintenance Mad Low PRV vented to condenso~ (vapors scrubbed) LOW Low Employee training, operating procedures, sparge system High Low Structural integrity Mad Low Compressor room ventilation, vibration/motion shutdown Low Low Glass protected, restricted access Mad Low Regular maintenance High Low Perimeter fencing, loading procedures None None None None Install flex connectors None None None Install guardrails HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM Study Node: 2.O1 Equipment: AMMONIA RECEIVER Drawing References: Guide Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a Severity Probability Con~'ols In Place Proposed Mitigation Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures NO Ammonia flow Closed valve to vessel None (compressors down) Low Low None None Ammonia flow Closed valve from vessel High pressure (compressors on) Med _ow Employee training None Ammonia flow Minor leak in system Release to ambient air (liquid ammonia) Low Med Regular maintenance None Ammonia flow System shutdown for maintenance None Low Med None None Power Condenser outage (short circuit) Ammonia pressure and temperature increases, Low Low Sparge system, excess flow valve None activate pressure relief valve (PRV) in receiver ILees IRecelver PRV fails IStructural integrity IMora I Pl'essure ITemperature I Pressure IPfessure IUndersized I defective Corrosion JClosed king valve, compressors on Increased friction in compressors High temperatures Ammonia ovedill Possible line I vessel rupture Minor liquid ammonia leak Receiver PRV will release Increased system pressure Receiver PRV release, vessel failure Receiver PRV release lOther I Earth movement I Earthquake Broken lines to vessels I Earth movement I Eadhquake Loss of power to system I Broken receiver sight glass I Sight glass accidentally hit Check valves seal off ammonia flow Failed sight glass check valve I Poor condition / failure Ammonia release Location I Vesse crushed Hit by forld ft / buck Description of Equipment Operation: 48" O.D. x 24' length x 0.432' thickness - SA-612 Carbon Steel Ammonia Storage Vessel All pipe connections Schedule 80 Maximum load to fill - 6,200 pounds Med Low Regular maintenance, p~ts replacement procedures Low Low Non-corrosive ammonia I oil mixture, murine inspection None None Low Med Employee training, operating procedures Low Low Regular maintenance Mm] Low PRV vented to condensor (vapors scrubbed) Low Low Employee baining, operating procedures, sparge system High Low Structural integrity Med Low Compressor room ventilation, vibration/motion shutdown Low Low Glass protected, resbicted access Meal Low Regular maintenance Hgh Low Per meter tencing, oading procedures None None None None Install flex connectors None None None Install guardrails HAZARDS AND OPERABILI HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: AMMONIA I~EI-NIGERAIION SY$[b.M Study Node: 1.01 Equipment: COMPRESSORS Drawing References: Guide Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a Severity l Probability Controls In Place Proposed Mitigation Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures No Power Power failure Compressor shutdown, possible ammonia seat leak Low Med Manual controls on suction, murine inspections, Sch. 80 line None Power Bad control circuit Compressor shutdown, possible ammonia seal leak Low Low Manual controls on suction, routine inspections, Sch. 80 line None Power High temperature or pressure shutdown Compressor shutdown, possible ammonia seal leak Low Low Manual controls on suction, routine inspections, Sch. 80 line None Water Operator failure to turn valve Compressor shutdown, motor burn out Low Low High temperature shutdown None Oil Plugged oil passage Compressor will freeze up Low Low Routine maintenance None Belt(s) Broken belts Compressor shutdown Low Low Routine inspections and maintenance None Motor Motor burned out Compressor shutdown Low Low System bypass to other compressors, maintenance None Ammonia flow Operator failure, closed king valve Possible line rupture, compressor shutdown High Low High pressure shutdown switch (240 psi), sparge system, PRY None Ammonia flow Closed discharge valve Open relief valve Low Low Hicjh pressure shutdown switch, sparge system, training None I Partially closed Possible line rupture, compressor shutdown Low Low High i , None ~Lesa [Ammonia flow IWorn seals king valve Low Med Emp oyee tra n ng, routine maintenance i iAmmonia flow Ammonia gas leak More ~Temperature ~Tomperature ITemperature IPressure IAmmonia flow Other: Earth movement Earth movement Earth movement Flood Fire Operator error Operator error Operator error Operator error No water Closed discharge valve Closed discharge valve, open suction System overfi Earthquake Earthquake Earthquake Canal overt'low Short circuit Valve not shut off alter oil drain Wrong compressor valve opened Forget to add oil Compressor not pumped down for maintenance Compressor shutdown Compressor shutdown Compressor shutdown Belts would slip, motor overload/shutdown ~ctlvate high level shutdown switch Fracture ammonia gas lines Power outage, possible seal leak from compmssers Fracture vapor return line Short circuit I motor burn out Pipes may rupture Potential for ammonia release Compressor damage Compressor damage Potential ammonia release, employee injury Description of Equipment Operation: - Each compressor is equipped with a temperature and pressure gauge. - Each compressor is equipped with an automatic high pressure shutdown switch with manual reset. Low Low Automatic high pressure shutdown, employee training None Low Low Automatic high pressure shutdown, employee training None Low Low Automatic high pressure shutdown, employee training None Low Low Pressure relief valve, employee training None Low Low Qua fled t~ ers~ employee training None Med Low Schd. 80 pipe, Seismic zone 4 construction Low Med ' Minor (seal) leaks = <200ppm, NH3 monitor alarm set @ 250 ppm Meal Low ~ Flex hose connection, excess flow valves. Remote shutoff valve Low ~ Low I Floordrain Med ~ Low I Fire prevention measures Med l Low ~ Employee training, operating procedures Low ~ Low ~ Employee training Low J Low J Employee training, Icg I Med I Low I Employee training, maintenance procedures Install air monitor Leaks detected by smell None None None Supervision None None Supervision Each compressor has one bypass and one suction valve, manually controlled. Gaseous ammonia enters the compressor through the suction line which is controlled by the suction valve. After compression, the gaseous ammonia leaves the compressor through the discharge line. Maintenance is ongoing, inspections daily. The compressors are equipped with an automatic vibration/motion shutdown switch with manual reset. 6r3/96 clients~kernhazo.wbl HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY (H P) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE Isystem: RJ~MONIA Study Node: 2,01 E({ulpment: AMMONIA RECEIVER Drawing References: Guide Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a Severity Probability Controls In Place Proposed Mitigation ' Word Deviation Deviation from Normal operation Measures No Ammonia flow Closed valve to vessel None (compressors down) Low Low None None Ammonia flow ~leeed valve from vessel High p~essure (compressors on) Meal Low Employee training None Ammonia flow Minor leak in system Release to ambient air (liquid ammonia) Low Med Regular maintenance None Ammonia flow System shutdown for maintenance INone Low Med None None Power Condenser outage (short circuit) ~,mmonla pressom and temperature Increases, Low Low Sperge system, excess flow valve None acUvate preseum relief valve (PRV) in receNer Less Receiver PRV fails Undersized I defective Possible line I vessel rupture Med Low Reg ', F Structure integrity Corrosion Minor liquid ammonia leak Low Low Non-corrosive ammonia I o I mb~ure, rouUne inspection None ITemperature Other I Earth movement I EaKh movement ]Broken receiver skjht glass lFalled sight glass check valve ILacation Closed king vaiva, compressors on Increased friction in compressors High temperatures Ammonia ove~lll Earthquake Earthquake Sight glass accidentally hit Poor condition / failure Vessel crushed Receiver PRV will release Increased system pressure Receiver PRY release, vessel failure Receiver PRY release Broken lines to vessels Loss of power to system Check vanes seal off ammonia flow Ammonia release Hit by forklift I truck Low Med Employee training, operating procedures Low Low Regular maintenance mED Low PRY vented to condensor (vapors scrubbed) Low Low IEmployee tm ning. operating procedures, sparge system High Low Structural integrity Med Low Compressor room ventilation, vibration/motion shutdown Low Low Glass protected, restricted access Med Low Regular maintenance High Low Perimeter fencing, oading procedures None None None None Insfalt flex hoses None None None Install guardra#s Deecrlptlon of Equipment Operation: - High pressure vessels confain ammonia as it travels from the compressors, through the oil separator, passed ~e condenser, to the receiver, 6/3J96 cliant~ernhazo.wbl HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM Study Node: 3.01 Equipment: FREEZER ROOMS Drawing References: Guide Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a : Severity Probabillt~ Controls in Place Proposed Mitigation Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures No Ammonia flow Plugged valves in storage rooms Inefficient room cooling Low Low Operator training, murine inspections None Water Valve closed Poor condenser operations Low Low Operator training, murine inspections None Power Power failure Poor condenser operations Low Low Operatol' training None Ammonia Solenoid fails closed System shutdown Low Low High pressure shutdown, rourine maintenance, inspection None :Ammonia Expansion valve broken System shutdown Low Low High pressure shutdown, murine maintenance, inspection None More IAmmonia flowin rooms lAmmonia flow in rooms I Prassure ITemperature IOther I Earth movement I Location IFira Dnscdptlon of Equipment Operation: - Rooms 1 - 14 are freezer rooms. - Recold units are water defrost. Solenoid stuck open Coil pressure build up, may trigger system shutdown Manual bypass left open Coil pressure build up, may tgigger system shutdown Coil pressure build up, may trigger system shutdown FireFire inin storageSt°rage roomsr°°ms Col pressure build up. may trigger system shutdown Earthquake Fracture lines, ammonia leak Vehicular collision Fracture vapor line Fire Ppefa ura - A float valve (operated by* a solenoid valve) in the accumulator tanks controls liquid flow through the Recold coils. Low Low Routine inspections, maintenance, high pressure shutdown None Low Low Operator training, high pressure shutdown None Low Low Automatic high pressure shutdown None Low Low Automatic high pressure shutdown None Med Low Vibration shutdovm, excess flow valve, Sch. 80 lines None Low Low Low pressure sensor, guard posts protect to the sldd None Med Low Excess flow valve, routine inspections, operator tm ning None 6/3/96 clients~kernhazo.wbl HAZARDS AND OPERA TY (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE System: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM Study Node: 4.01 Equipment: COOLER ROOMS Drawing References: Guide Deviation Cause of the Consequences Resulting from a Severity Probability Controls in Place Proposed Mitigation Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures No Ammonia Solenoid fails closed System shutdown Low Low High pressure shutdown, routine maintenanse, inspection None Ammonia Expansion valve broken System shutdown 'Low Low High pressure shutdown, routine maintenance, inspection None Power Power failure Compressor shutdown, poor condenser operations ~ Low Operator training None Water Valve cL_nsed_ Poor condenser operations Low Operator training, routine inspections None IMore IAmmon~ . IAmmonla lAmmonia llow in rooms ~Ammonia flow in rooms ] Pressure I Temperature Solenoid fails open Expansion valve fails Solenoid stuck open Manual bypass left open Fire in storage rooms Fire n storage rooms I Less efficient operations .ow Med None Less efficient operations .ow Med None Pressure in coils will build up, may trigger system shutd .ow Low Routine inspections, maintenance, high pressure shutdown Pressure in coils will build up, may t~igger system shutd .ow Low Operator training, high pressure shutdown Pressure in coils will build up, may trigger system shutd .ow Low Automatic high pressure shutdown Pressure in coils will bu!td up, may.trii3ger system shutd .ow Low Automat c high pressure shutdown I Other IEarth movement Earthquake IFracture lines, ammonia leak Med Low Vibration shutdown, excess flow valve, Sch. 80 lines INone I Location Vehicular collision IFracture vapor line Low Low Low pressure sensor, guard posts protect to the skid I None Med ILow Excess Ilow valve, rout ne nspections, operator training INone I IFire Fre IPipe failure Description of Equipment Operation: - Rooms 15 - 34 are cooler rooms None None None None None None 6/3/96 clients~kernhazo.wbl HAZARDS AND OPERABILITY (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM Study Node: 5,01 Equipment ,* GAS/LIQUID SEPARATION VESSEL Drawing References: Guide DevlaUon Cause of the Consequences ResulUng from a Severity Probabilit~ Controls in Place Proposed MlflgaUon Word Deviation Deviation from Normal Operation Measures No Ammonia flow System shutdown None Low Meal Routine maintenance None Ammonia pump Pump motor burned out Excess liquid in unit, system pressure increase Low Low High pressure shutdown, murine maintenance None Ammonia pump Broken belt Excess liquid in unit, system pressure increase Low Low High pressure shutdown, murine maintenance None Float control Float fails Compressor damage from liquids Low Low Routine maintenance, inspection !None IOther I Earth movement Earthquake I Fire F re Description of Equipment Operation: - Tank receives liquids and gases from freezer and cooler rooms ILines to separator break High pressures tdgger shutdown, line failure Well supported lines, vibration shutdown, routine inspections None Excess flow valve, murine inspections, operator tm ning None 6/4/96 clients~kernhazo, wbl HAZARDS AND OPERABILIT~ STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE System: Study Node: Equ pment: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM 6.00 LOADING OF AMMONIA RECEIVER Drawing References: INulde IDeviation ord o IAmmonia flow into tank IAmmonia vapor returns I ~p~e?nia flow from truck Cause of the Deviation Inlet valve closed IReturn line valve closed lCheck valve on liquid fill IPower failure Consequences Resulting from a Deviation from Normal Operation Overpressurize line, hose rupture IOVerePressurize line. hose rupture Less IAmmonia flow into tank lAmmonia vapor returns IAmmonia vapor returns IAmmonia flow from truck IMore IAmmonia flow into tank IPressure in tank ITemperature IOther IEarth movement I Location ]Operator error ~Operator error ~Operator error ~Operator error ] Driver error ~Operator error Inlet valve closed Return line valve closed High pressure in storage tank Check valve on liquid fill N/A Higher ambient temperature Higher ambient temperature Earthquake Vehicular collision Vehicle moves Sight glass improperly read Valve not shut off propedy Worn hose not noticed Vehicle accident Fill hose connected to vapor line Overpressurize line, hose rupture Overpressurize line, hose rupture PRY opens None LiN'mAlt flow dudng filling IIncrease pressure, f ow potential Rupture lines Rupture hose Rupture hose, fill line Too much ammonia in system, PRY releases Ammonia leak Possible ammonia leak Rupture tanker Compressor pulls liquid and stalls. No hazard Severity Probability Controls In Place l High I Low I PRVs, operator present dudng filling, written procedures High ILow I PRVs, operator present during filling, written procedures High Low PRVs. operator present during filling, written procedures High Low PRVs, operator present during filling, written procedures Low ILow ~Sparge system for PRY ILow Low 1None I ~A IJ~A IN,A Low ILow ITraining. vapor return line, PRVs Low ILow ITraining. written procedures Proposed Mitigation Measures ~lone None None None ;None None ~one ~one High Low ICheck valve on fill line Install High Low Cordoned off area during filling None High Low IWheels chocked, written procedures None Low Med PRY activates, training I None Med I Low Employee b'aining I None MOd ILow Inspection procedures ~ None I None High I Low DOT approved vessel, BFD approved route, licensed operator I None Low ~ Low Hoses have different sized connectors flex hose 6/3/96 clients~kernhazo.wbl HAZARDS AND OPERAE (HAZOP) STUDY FORM COMPANY: KERN ICE & COLD STORAGE ISystem: Study Node: Equipment: AMMONIA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM 7.iX) FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY REFRIGERANT cONTROL BOX WITH SPARGE SYSTEM Drawing References: Deviation Cause of the I Consequences Resulting from a Deviation ~ Deviation from Normal Operation Raw water tank leak with dump valve op |Release of ammonia I Raw water tank leak with dump valve op [Release of ammonia I Overfill tank None Raw water tank isolation valve closed Rupture line More IWater IPressure in sparge line IOther Dump valve open · I Earth movement ILocation Operator error Earthquake Vehicu ar collision Release of ammonia to diffusion tank Fracture liquid line Fracture liquid line Description of Equipment Operation: Control box equipped with dump valves to divert ammonia to sparge tank in case of emergency. 10,000 gallon raw water tank se~ves as the diffusion tank. Carbon steel piping meets ANSI B16.5, ANSI 31.1 requirements. Controls In Place inspection inspection Proposed Mitigation" Measures Install sparge tank gauge INone N/A N/A Routine inspection High Low Routine inspection INone Lock valve open Low Low Operator training, emergency dump system I Ic°ntmls will be secured I Low I Low Excess flow valve ILow ILOW IExcess low va ve, pedmeter fencing None None None 6/3/96 clients~kernhazo.wbl APPENDIX D-Ill PROCESS FLOW AND PIPING DIAGRAMS ~ ~.~o ~p~ ~ ~o ~P- T.o.~. O) ~ ~ '~"~ T~, - · .... . .......F'_: ..... · -- . ~ I~ .... ~"' ' ' ' .... $ ;<.['. '.0'.: :' :.) J':~' c~ ,' :;, :, . · , ~ ,, · ~ ,. .............. ~~ .'" ' , ,"-: :':...n;~ I / ,o - J 2' ": ..... '"' ,'.'...~:~:r..'~ .,...~: ~.~;', ..... :..~, I '" a' l; ..... '~'~ ~...,...c .:.:'.:u.'.'x.% ~:;; .'.-.., :.. '.';I , ~ ..... - s..L::.'~: :, :-..- ....... . : ....... · · ~IH. ~' ....... : ~ _ - ~ - ~- : - -',':' "~ ~"-. ' .............. ." ':"':' ~.~.., .... ...~.,, ? ?, ~ ~... ,;,,... ....... ~ ~ ~ · I';" r,'i.i¢ :.n 3 d ;:.;. ::.-,.,.-.-: '. ' ' II ' - ....... J G ~~ Il ~,, - v % , ~ I " ' ..... " " ....... :' . ' _, ~ ~ I; ~r.~ ¢¢~ IH I ~ - t ~':,r,'r~ --. ........... ~ ' ~,,,~...',~,, : ............. ,~i,,.~. .y /'~~ ~:l .~= ~ ' · l~! E-:I:-JZ¢..,. ' / % % . ~,, / /, ~.rr. / ....... ~-~ ~ ~ ........ 14~' ~~ ... · , ~~~ ~'~n.s~c.~Eu ~ '- _)J -'~-~- · h~ I ~ ~.~ L ~1 ',~ i /~ - I. ~.p:.-' . , /li~-- ,~,-~ ........ - ~ ...... % ..... F ~, '~-=*.- ~ _r~_ _: f ~J / ¢! ........ ~1 BY fW[161tT. ~EFO~ FiLI.IN6. ALL ~ ~.~f F- . . , ~ 192400MPTO APPENDIX D-IV ARCHIE COMPUTER MODELING RESULTS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ADDRESS \ LOCATION DATE OF ASSESSMENT NAME OF DISK FILE = ANHYDROUS AMMONIA = KERN ICE / BAKERSFIELD = JUNE 1996 = KERNIDLH.ASF *** SCENARIO DESCRIPTION CASE 1 --- PARTIAL LINE BREAK (45 GPM) --- NIGHTIME CONDITIONS (CLASS F) --- IDLH CONCENTRATIONS (500 PPM) ******* DISCHARGE RATE/DURATION ESTIMATES Liquefied gas discharge from outlet <= 4 in. from tank Average discharge rate Duration of discharge Amount discharged State of material = 292.8 lbs/min = 21.3 minutes = 6230 lbs = Mix of gas/aerosol ******* TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind distance to concentration of 500 ppm -- at groundlevel = 5330 feet Note: Minimum computable answer is 33 feet! Actual hazard distance may be less. Note: User changed vapor emission rate prior to use of toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. Final user provided rate was 292.8 lbs/min. Note: User changed vapor emission duration prior toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. provided duration was 21.3 minutes. to use of Final user Note: See last page of printout for list of results originally computed by ARCHIE. See attached table(s) for further details. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS ,nd Distance Groundlevel Concentration (feet) (miles) (ppm) Source Height Concentration (ppm) Initial Evacuation Zone Width* (feet) 100 .02 542012 542012 73 474 .09 28003 28003 350 848 .17 9974 9974 620 1221 .24 5327 5327 890 1595 .31 3403 3403 1170 1968 .38 2405 2405 1440 2342 .45 1813 1813 1710 2715 .52 1429 1429 1980 3089 .59 1164 1164 2250 3462 .66 973 973 2520 3836 .73 829 829 2800 4209 .8 718 718 3070 4583 .87 630 630 3340 4956 .94 559 559 3610 5330 1.01 500 500 1 *Usually safe for < 1 hour release. Longer releases or sudden wind shifts may require a larger width or different direction for the evacuation zone. See Chapters 3 and 12 of the guide for details. Source height specified by the user for this scenario was 0 feet. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind Distance (feet) (miles) Contaminant Arrival Time at Downwind Location (minutes) Contaminant Departure Time at Downwind Location (minutes) 100 .02 .3 21.9 474 .09 1.2 23.7 848 .17 2.2 25.6 1221 .24 3.1 -27.5 1595 .31 4.1 29.4 1968 .38 5 31.3 2342 .45 6 33.2 2715 .52 6.9 35.1 3089 .59 7.9 37 3462 .66 8.8 38.8 3836 .73 9.7 40.7 4209 .8 10.7 42.6 4583 .87 11.6 44.5 4956 .94 12.6 46.4 5330 1.01 13.5 48.3 CAUTION: See guide for assumptions used in estimating these times. INPUT PARAMETER SUMMARY PHYSIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL NORMAL BOILING POINT MOLECULAR WEIGHT LIQUID SPECIFIC GRAVITY VAPOR PRES AT CONTAINER TEMP TOXIC VAPOR LIMIT = -27.4 degrees F = 17 = .52 = 90 psia = 4657 mm Hg = 500 ppm CONTAINER CHARACTERISTICS CONTAINER TYPE = TANK DIAMETER = 4 TANK LENGTH = 24 TOTAL WEIGHT OF CONTENTS = 6230 WEIGHT OF LIQUID = 6200 LIQUID HEIGHT IN CONTAINER = 2.5 WEIGHT OF GAS UNDER PRESSURE = 30.4 TOTAL CONTAINER VOLUME = 301.6 LIQUID VOLUME IN CONTAINER = 2256 = 191.1 = 1429 110.6 .55 .62 60 VAPOR/GAS VOLUME IN CONTAINER = DISCHARGE HOLE DIAMETER = DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF HOLE = TEMP OF CONTAINER CONTENTS = Horizontal cylinder feet feet lbs lbs feet lbs ft3 gals ft3 gals ft3 inch (es) degrees F ENVIRONMENTAL/LOCATION CHARACTERISTICS AMBIENT TEMPERATURE = 70 WIND VELOCITY = 4.5 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS = F VAPOR/GAS DISCHARGE HEIGHT = 0 degrees F mph feet KEY RESULTS PROVIDED BY USER INSTEAD OF BY EVALUATION METHODS NONE OBSERVED KEY RESULTS OVERRIDDEN BY USER AT SOME POINT AFTER COMPUTATION VAPOR EVOLUTION RATE = 5330 lb/min VAPOR EVOLUTION DURATION = 1 minutes HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ADDRESS \ LOCATION DATE OF ASSESSMENT NAME OF DISK FILE = ANHYDROUS AMMONIA = KERN ICE / BAKERSFIELD = JUNE 1996 = KERNIDLH.ASF *** SCENARIO DESCRIPTION CASE 1 --- PARTIAL LINE BREAK (45 GPM) --- NIGHTTIME CONDITIONS (CLASS F) --- LOC CONCENTRATIONS (50 PPM) ******* DISCHARGE RATE/DURATION ESTIMATES Liquefied gas discharge from outlet <= 4 in. from tank Average discharge rate Duration of discharge Amount discharged State of material = 292.8 lbs/min = 21.3 minutes = 6230 lbs = Mix of gas/aerosol ******* TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind distance to concentration of 50 ppm -- at groundlevel = 27095 feet Note: Minimum computable answer is 33 feet! Actual hazard distance may be less. Note: User changed vapor emission rate prior to use of toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. Final user provided rate was 292.8 lbs/min. Note: User changed vapor emission duration prior toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. provided duration was 21.3 minutes. to use of Final user Note: See last page of printout for list of results originally computed by ARCHIE. See attached table(s) for further details. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS nd Distance Groundlevel Concentration (feet) (miles) (ppm) Source Height Concentration (ppm) Initial Evacuation Zone Width* (feet) 100 .02 542012 542012 73 2029 .39 2288 2288 1480 3957 .75 790 790 2890 5885 1.12 431 431 4290 7813 1.48 283 283 5690 9741 1.85 205 205 7100 11670 2.22 159 159 8500 13598 2.58 128 128 9900 15526 2.95 107 107 11310 17454 3.31 90.3 90.3 12710 19382 3.68 78.3 78.3 14110 21311 4.04 68.9 68.9 15520 23239 4.41 61.3 61.3 16920 25167 4.77 55.2 55.2 18320 27095 5.14 50 50 1 *Usually safe for < 1 hour release. Longer releases or sudden wind shifts may require a larger width or different direction for the evacuation zone. See Chapters 3 and 12 of the guide for details. Source height specified by the user for this scenario was 0 feet. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind Distance (feet) (miles) Contaminant Arrival Time at Downwind Location (minutes) Contaminant Departure Time at Downwind Location (minutes) 100 .02 .3 21.9 2029 .39 5.2 31.6 3957 .75 10 41.3 5885 1.12 14.9 51.1 7813 1.48 19.8 60.8 9741 1.85 24.6 70.5 11670 2.22 29.5 80.3 1359'8 2.58 34.4 90 15526 2.95 39.3 99.8 17454 3.31 44.1 109.5 19382 3.68 49 119.2 21311 4.04 53.9 129 23239 4.41 58.7 138.7 25167 4.77 63.6 148.5 27095 5.14 68.5 158.2 CAUTION: See guide for assumptions used in estimating these times. INPUT PARAMETER SUMMARY PHYSIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL NORMAL BOILING POINT MOLECULAR WEIGHT LIQUID SPECIFIC GRAVITY VAPOR PRES AT CONTAINER TEMP TOXIC VAPOR LIMIT = -27.4 degrees F = 17 = .52 = 90 psia = 4657 mm Hg = 50 ppm CONTAINER CHARACTERISTICS CONTAINER TYPE TANK DIAMETER TANK LENGTH TOTAL WEIGHT OF CONTENTS WEIGHT OF LIQUID LIQUID HEIGHT IN CONTAINER WEIGHT OF GAS UNDER PRESSURE TOTAL CONTAINER VOLUME LIQUID VOLUME IN CONTAINER VAPOR/GAS VOLUME IN CONTAINER = DISCHARGE HOLE DIAMETER = DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF HOLE = TEMP OF CONTAINER CONTENTS = = Horizontal cylinder = 4 feet = 24 feet = 6230 lbs = 6200 lbs = 2.5 feet = 30.4 lbs = 301.6 ft3 = 2256 gals = 191.1 ft3 = 1429 gals 110.6 ft3 .55 inch(es) .62 60 degrees F ENVIRONMENTAL/LOCATION CHARACTERISTICS AMBIENT TEMPERATURE = 70 WIND VELOCITY = 4.5 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS = F VAPOR/GAS DISCHARGE HEIGHT = 0 degrees F mph feet KEY RESULTS PROVIDED BY USER INSTEAD OF BY EVALUATION METHODS NONE OBSERVED KEY RESULTS OVERRIDDEN BY USER AT SOME POINT AFTER COMPUTATION VAPOR EVOLUTION RATE = 5330 lb/min VAPOR EVOLUTION DURATION = 1 minutes HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ADDRESS \ LOCATION DATE OF ASSESSMENT NAME OF DISK FILE = ANHYDROUS AMMONIA = KERN ICE / BAKERSFIELD = JUNE 1996 = KERNIDLH.ASF *** SCENARIO DESCRIPTION CASE 2 --- PARTIAL LINE BREAK (45 GPM) --- DAYTIME CONDITIONS (CLASS B) --- IDLH CONCENTRATION (500 PPM) ******* DISCHARGE RATE/DURATION ESTIMATES Liquefied gas discharge from outlet <= 4 in. from tank Average discharge rate Duration of discharge Amount discharged State of material = 292.8 lbs/min = 21.3 minutes = 6230 lbs = Mix of gas/aerosol ******* TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind distance to concentration of 500 ppm -- at groundlevel = 645 feet Note: Minimum computable answer is 33 feet! Actual hazard distance may be less. Note: User changed vapor emission rate prior to use of toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. Final user provided rate was 292.8 lbs/min. Note: User changed vapor emission duration prior toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. provided duration was 21.3 minutes. to use of Final user Note: See last page of printout for list of results originally computed by ARCHIE. See attached table(s) for further details. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS ~ownwind Distance (feet) (miles) Groundlevel Concentration (ppm) Source Height Concentration (ppm) Initial Evacuation Zone Width* (feet) 100 .02 18739 18739 350 139 .03 9910 9910 490 178 .04 6137 6137 620 217 .05 4178 4178 760 256 .05 3031 3031 890 295 .06 2301 2301 1030 334 .07 1808 1808 1110 373 .08 1458 1458 1060 412 .08 1202 1202 1000 451 .09 1008 1008 930 490 .1 857 857 850 529 .11 739 739 750 568 .11 643 643 620 606 .12 565 565 450 645 .13 500 500 1 *Usually safe for < 1 hour release. Longer releases or sudden wind shifts may require a larger width or different direction for the evacuation zone. See Chapters 3 and 12 of the guide for details. Source height specified by the user for this scenario was 0 feet. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind Distance (feet) (miles) Contaminant Arrival Time at Downwind Location (minutes) Contaminant Departure Time at Downwind Location (minutes) 100 .02 .2 21.7 139 .03 .3 21.8 178 .04 .4 22 217 .05 .4 22.1 256 .05 .5 22.3 295 .06 .6 22.4 334 .07 .6 22.5 373 .08 .7 22.7 412 .08 .8 22.8 451 .09 .9 23 490 .1 .9 23.1 529 .11 1 23.2 568 .11 1.1 23.4 606 .12 1.1 23.5 645 .13 1.2 23.6 CAUTION: See guide for assumptions used in estimating these times. INPUT PARAMETER SUMMARY PHYSIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL NORMAL BOILING POINT MOLECULAR WEIGHT LIQUID SPECIFIC GRAVITY VAPOR PRES AT CONTAINER TEMP TOXIC VAPOR LIMIT = -27.4 degrees F = 17 = .52 = 90 psia = 4657 mm Hg = 500 ppm CONTAINER CHARACTERISTICS CONTAINER TYPE = TANK DIAMETER = 4 TANK LENGTH = 24 TOTAL WEIGHT OF CONTENTS = 6230 WEIGHT OF LIQUID = 6200 LIQUID HEIGHT IN CONTAINER = 2.5 WEIGHT OF GAS UNDER PRESSURE = 30.4 TOTAL CONTAINER VOLUME = 301.6 LIQUID VOLUME IN CONTAINER = 2256 = 191.1 = 1429 110.6 .55 .62 60 VAPOR/GAS VOLUME IN CONTAINER = DISCHARGE HOLE DIAMETER = DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF HOLE = TEMP OF CONTAINER CONTENTS = Horizontal cylinder feet feet lbs lbs feet lbs ft3 gals ft3 gals ft3 inch (es) degrees F ENVIRONMENTAL/LOCATION CHARACTERISTICS AMBIENT TEMPERATURE = 77.7 WIND VELOCITY = 6.4 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS = B VAPOR/GAS DISCHARGE HEIGHT = 0 degrees F mph feet KEY RESULTS PROVIDED BY USER INSTEAD OF BY EVALUATION METHODS NONE OBSERVED KEY RESULTS OVERRIDDEN BY USER AT SOME POINT AFTER COMPUTATION VAPOR EVOLUTION RATE =, 5330 lb/min VAPOR EVOLUTION DURATION = 1 minutes HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ADDRESS \ LOCATION DATE OF ASSESSMENT NAME OF DISK FILE = ANHYDROUS AMMONIA = KERN ICE / BAKERSFIELD = JUNE 1996 = KERNIDLH.ASF *** SCENARIO DESCRIPTION CASE 2 --- PARTIAL LINE BREAK (45GPM) --- DAYTIME CONDITIONS (CLASS B) --- LOC CONCENTRATION (50 PPM) ******* DISCHARGE RATE/DURATION ESTIMATES Liquefied gas discharge from outlet <= 4 in. from tank Average discharge rate Duration of discharge Amount discharged State of material = 292.8 lbs/min = 21.3 minutes = 6230 lbs = Mix of gas/aerosol ******* TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind distance to concentration of 50 ppm -- at groundlevel = 2092 feet Note: Minimum computable answer is 33 feet! Actual hazard distance may be less. Note: User changed vapor emission rate prior to use of toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. Final user provided rate was 292.8 lbs/min. Note: User changed vapor emission duration prior toxic or flammable vapor dispersion model. provided duration was 21.3 minutes. to use of Final user Note: See last page of printout for list of results originally computed by ARCHIE. See attached table(s) for further details. TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Distance Groundlevel Source Height Initial Evacuation Concentration Concentration Zone Width* (feet) (miles) (ppm) (ppm) (feet) 100 .02 18739 18739 350 243 .05 3366 3366 840 385 .08 1370 1370 1340 527 .1 742 742 1830 669 .13 466 466 2320 812 .16 320 320 2820 954 .19 233 233 3310 1096 .21 178 178 3570 1238 .24 140 140 3380 1381 .27 113 113 3150 1523 .29 93.2 93.2 2870 1665 .32 78.3 78.3 2540 1807 .35 66.7 66.7 2110 1950 .37 57.5 57.5 1520 2092 .4 50 50 1 *Usually safe for < 1 hour release. Longer releases or sudden wind shifts may require a larger width or different direction for the evacuation zone. See Chapters 3 and 12 of the guide for details. Source height specified by the user for this scenario was 0 feet. ~ TOXIC VAPOR DISPERSION ANALYSIS RESULTS Downwind Distance (feet) (miles) Contaminant Arrival Time at Downwind Location (minutes) Contaminant Departure Time at Downwind Location (minutes) 100 .02 .2 21.7 243 .05 .5 22.2 385 .08 .7 22.7 527 .1 1 23.2 669 .13 1.2 23.7 812 .16 1.5 24.2 954 .19 1.7 24.7 1096 .21 2 25.2 1238 .'24 2.2 25.7 1381 .27 2.5 26.3 1523 .29 2.8 26.8 1665 .32 3 27.3 1807 .35 3.3 27.8 1950 .37 3.5 28.3 2092 .4 3.8 28.8 CAUTION: See guide for assumptions used in estimating these times. INPUT PARAMETER SUMMARY PHYSIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL NORMAL BOILING POINT MOLECULAR WEIGHT LIQUID SPECIFIC GRAVITY VAPOR PRES AT CONTAINER TEMP TOXIC VAPOR .LIMIT = -27.4 = 17 = .52 = 90 = 4657 = 50 degrees F psia mm Hg ppm CONTAINER CHARACTERISTICS CONTAINER TYPE = TANK DIAMETER = 4 TANK LENGTH = 24 TOTAL WEIGHT OF CONTENTS = 6230 WEIGHT OF LIQUID = 6200 LIQUID HEIGHT IN CONTAINER = 2.5 WEIGHT OF GAS UNDER PRESSURE = 30.4 TOTAL CONTAINER VOLUME = 301.6 = 2256 = 191.1 = 1429 110.6 .55 .62 , 60 LIQUID VOLUME IN CONTAINER VAPOR/GAS VOLUME IN CONTAINER = DISCHARGE HOLE DIAMETER = DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF HOLE = TEMP OF CONTAINER CONTENTS = Horizontal cylinder feet feet lbs lbs feet lbs ft3 gals ft3 gals ft3 inch(es) degrees F ENVIRONMENTAL/LOCATION CHARACTERISTICS AMBIENT TEMPERATURE = 77.7 WIND VELOCITY = 6.4 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASS = B VAPOR/GAS DISCHARGE HEIGHT = 0 degrees F mph feet KEY RESULTS PROVIDED BY USER INSTEAD OF BY EVALUATION METHODS NONE OBSERVED KEY RESULTS OVERRIDDEN BY USER AT SOME POINT AFTER COMPUTATION VAPOR EVOLUTION RATE = 5330 lb/min VAPOR EVOLUTION DURATION = 1 minutes APPENDIX E EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN APPENDIX E EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 1. General Evacuation Employees are verbally notified of emergencies by the Plant Engineer or his designee. All employees are to leave the facility immediately through the nearest exit and regroup on 30th Street on the west of the canal. The following page (Exhibit 7) also shows the emergency evacuation routes. Emergency responders will be notified through 911. 2. Fire If a fire occurs, all employees are to leave immediately through the nearest exist and regroup at the front of the building. Emergency responders will be notified through 911. Fire Station #4 is the closest fire station at 130 Bernard Street. The fire department should be apprised of the existence of ammonia in the plant. Water spray can be used to dilute ammonia vapors. Cooling the receiver with water can prevent the release of ammonia. 3. 'Earthquake Employees should remain in safe, stable locations (in doorways, under sturdy desks) until earth movement has ceased. After the earthquake, all employees are to leave immediately through the nearest exit and regroup at the front of the building, far enough from the building to avoid falling masonry. 11140010.009 1 4. Ammonia Release In the event of a significant ammonia release, all employees are to be verbally notified by the Plant Engineer or his designee. All employees are to follow the instructions given to them by the Plant Engineer or designated emergency responder. This may included evacuation to a designated spot or staying indoors, closing all doors and windows and shutting down ventilation systems, depending upon the location and type of ammonia leak. 11140010.009 2 APPENDIX F RMPP AUDIT CHECKLIST Kern Ice and Cold Storage Date APPENDIX F RMPP AUDIT CHECKLIST Name Signature * Has a Facility Modification affecting AHM handling been documented in RMPP? Yes No N/A If yes, does Hazard Analysis need to be modified? Yes No * Are all written operating procedures provided in Appendix B up to date? Yes No * After an unannounced spot check, were the standard operating procedures (SOP) performed as written? Yes No Date and time of SOP spot checks ~ If no, has training been scheduled to review written procedures? Yes No * Have changes in SOP or New SOP been documented in RMPP? Yes No N/A * Have all maintenance inspections, and PMs been performed? Yes No * Have all safety relief valves been inspected/replaced annually? Yes No * Has each AHM accident/incident been investigated including method developed to prevent reoccurrence been documented? Yes No N/A * Has an AHM release been reported as required under Section XI of the RMPP? Yes No N/A * Have changes made to AHM system, processes and operations been reviewed under management of change procedures, as described in Section XIV of the RMPP, prior to implementation. Yes No N/A * Is all AHM safety equipment available and in good condition? Yes No * Has list of all current employees been reviewed against master training checklist provided in Appendix G of RMPP? Yes No * If yes have all employees received the training listed on checklist? Yes No * If no, has training been scheduled to bring all employees current? Yes No 11140010.RMPPAUD.FRM WlZl INC APPENDIX G RMPP TRAINING CHECKLIST APPENDIX G TI~,AINING I~EQUII~EDICOMPLETED Manager J.W. (CPR) first aid Completed Completed 4 Completed 4 ongoing with training Daughtry 6/30/90 4/times/year times/year times/year Warehouse foreman Gary Johnson ...... Engineer Richard Dixon .......... Warehouseman A. Rodriguez ...... Office Manager ........ Dixie Arvizu 11140010.008