Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MITIGATION (13)
HAZ~~OUS MATERIALS 1~. SION ..~. TIME CHARGED BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENTNAME: C~%l-co f~c:-mo¢~,. 4c~ F~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT NUMBER: DATE:. NAME: 'TIME CHGD:. lO k,- COMMENTS: PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE: ~"'~J~T ZlMMERMAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 AVENUE OF THI~ STARS SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 DIRECT DIAL: (310) 785-6884 TELEPHONE: (310) 553-3610 FAX: J310) 553-0687 E-MAIL: kzimmerl~an@gg rcm k.com WEBSITE: www. gg~cmk.com GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN MACHTINGER KINSELLA Lita D. Freer,' Senior Project Man~.~.~/ Consulting · Engineering · Remediation 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway Suite 120 Alameda, CA 94502 (510) 748-6700 FAX (510) 748-6799 e-mail: Ifreeman @ensr. com web: http://www.ensr, com /\ ,' i~-oWard wines ,inVentOr INVENT ORY OF INJECTION WELLS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Underg round Injection Control Program SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 3. This information is collected under the author ity of the Safe Drinking Water Act, per the Underg round Injection Control regulations at 40 CFR part 144.26 and reiterated at 144.83. This form is intended for use by injection well owners and operators in EPA Region 9 states (California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada), Pacific Islands and adjacent Tribal lands. Your responses should be typed or written legibly, signed and returned to EPA by regular mail. Please do not email. NOTE: Septic systems, cesspools and other injection wells used for the disposal of solely sonitar y waste with the capacity to serve fewer than 20 persons per day (single-f amily dwellings) are not subject to inventor y requirements . EPA Region 9 does not seek inventory information regarding drains used solely to protect residential structural foundations from precipitati on. I13. DATE PREPARED (yr/mo/da y) · TRANSACTION TYPE (please mark one) 2. FACILITY ID NO. (leave blank if you do not have a RCRA I _ Deletion _ First Time Entry _ Change (ex: ownership, type of well) __ Pre-closure Notification 4. FACILITY INFORMATION A. Facility Name B. Street Address (do not use P.O. Box) *Latitude/Longitude Information can be obained at no charge by going to the following website: www ·epa.go v/owm/ sw/industr y/inde x.htm, and selecting Latitude/Longitude Finders under the Resources Section. SIC codes can be obtained by searching http://www .osha.go v/oshstats/sicser .html. C. *Latitude (deg/min/sec) D. Longitude (deg/min/sec) E. SiC Code(s) I~ City/Town G. State H. Zip Code I. County J. On Tribal Land? Yes or No 5. LEGAL CONT ACT A. Type (Check all that apply): __ Owner __ Operator B. Contact Name C. Contact Organization Name D. Contact Mailing Address E. City/State/ZIP Fl. Contact Telephone F2. Contact FAX F3. Contact E-mail G. Ownership: (check one) _ Private __Pub lic H. Please list any local, state or other permits on file with a regulator y agency f or hazardous mater ials or hazardous waste management, or waste discharges, relevant to the use of your injection well(s). I FOR EPA USE ONLY I Rec'd Date: [ Entrd Dbase: Follow Up? Y or N Staff: CONTINUED NEXT PAGE. 'Form ~d~pt~d~ from OMB No. 20~0-0042, Region 9 version of EPAForm 7520-16 Page 1 of 3 6. WELL INFORMATION C. Well Operation Status A. sub-Class B. # wells UC AC PC TA PA example: 5X28 2 I I 6D. Comments: (attach additional sheets as needed) 7. Certification Statement I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements of "author ization by rule" for operation of injection wells. I certify under penalty of law that there are no discharges of hazardous substances or other fluids in amounts which may endanger an underg round source of drinking water from the injection well(s) identified on this inventory form, per 40 CFR Part 144.12 and 144.82. Additionally , I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or super vision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel proper ly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gather lng the information, the information is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Name (printed or typed): Title: Signature: ONCE YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE FORM, SIGN (#7), MAKE COPY FOR YOUR OWN FILES AND MAIL ORIGINAL(S) TO: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ground Water Office (WTR-9) UIC Inventory 75 Hawthor ne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3109 Questions about this form? Please call (415) 744-2250. For general questions about Safe Drinking Water Act programs at EPA, including the Underground Injection Control Prog ram, see www .epa.go v/ safewater, or call the Safe Drinking Water Act Hotline at (800) 426- 4791, EST. Table 6: Terms UC: under constr uction AC: active well PC: Preclosure notice TA: abandoned without notification/ approval by regulator PA: per manently abandoned (closed) with notification/appro val by regulator (please list name of agency and date of approval in comment box) 6A. Sub-Classes of Shallow Injection Wells 5A5 geother mai reinjectate 5A6 geother mai heat source 5A7 heat pump/A C return flow 5A8 geother mai aquaculture 5A19 cooling water return (specify contact or non-contact) 5B22 Saline Barrier/Intrusion Barrier 5D2 Stormwater drainage (precipitation, exterior wash only) 5D4 Stormwater combined with industrial or commercial process fluids 5F1 Agricultur al drainage 5G30 Special drainage (define) 5R21 Aquifer Recharge ,drinking water storage 5S23 Subsidence control 5W10 Cesspool 5Wll Septic System 5W12 Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent 5W20 Combined sewage and industr ialor commercial process fluids discharging to cesspool or septic system 5W32 Community leachfields, lagoons, or other effluent dispersal methods 5X13 Mining BackfilIWell 5X14 Solution Mining Welt 5X15 tn-situ Fossil Fuel Reco very 5X16 Brine Return Flow 5X17 Air Scrubber Waste 5X18 Water Softener regeneration 5X25 Experimental Technology 5X26 Aquifer Remediation 5X27 Other (define) 5X28 Motor Vehicle Waste disposal Form adapted from OMB No. 2040;.0042, Region 9 version of~-PA'Form ~52b-16 , Page 2 of 3 ~-~-aTd Wine~ ~:"invento~_.pdf INVENT ORY OF INJECTION WELLS -Instructions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Underg round Injection Control Prog ram ............ ii~'0~,MA ¥iO1~ FbR'(~ 'WNEi~$ ANDbpERA TbR$ Oi~ .... ~: ...... . ._ s__UB__M!~TTING __ .R_EGIO?. .9 V~RSlON OF EPA. 1. WHAT IS THIS REQUIREMENT? Because more than half of the nation depends on underg round sources of drinking water, subsurf ace waste disposal is regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Such disposal systems are also called "injection wells", from m ulti-family septic systems to the deepest disposal wells pumping millions of gallons per day into the earth. WHAT IS A SHALLOW INJECTION WELL? 144.3, revised 12/7/99, says a "well" is a bored, drilled, or driven shaft whose depth is greater than the largest surface dimension; or, a dug hole whose depth is greater than the largest surface dimension; or, an impro veal sinkhole; or, a subsurf ace fluid distribution system. A "subsurf ace fluid distribution system" is an assemblage of perforated pipes, drain tiles, or other similar mechanisms intended to distribute fluids below the surface of the ground. Septic systems, drywells, cesspools, seepage pits, percolation trenches , and drainfields, are common terms used to describe different types of shallow injection construction. 2. SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM: State drinking water programs are in the process of delineating areas where drinking water sources are located and/or recharged. More stringent regulations ma y apply to injection wells and other potential contaminant sources within these areas. 3. PAPER WORK REDUCTION ACT NOTICE: The pub lic repor ting burden for this collection of information is estimated at about 1 hour per year, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gather lng and maintaining data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of inf or mation, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Chief, Information Policy Branch, 2136, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW, Washington DC 20460, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Washington DC 20503. All owners/operators of injection wells are required to submit inventor y information to U.S. EPA (or its delegated state representativ e) regarding the location and type of all injection wells operated. (40 CFR Part 144.26.) Updates are required any time there is a significant change in the status of the well, for example, when the well is closed, or when ownership changes. For more than 95% of all Class V wells, no federal permits will be required. Submission of accurate inventor y information mak es you "author ized by rule" to oper ate your injection well(s) provided that they are not used for the disposal of fluids which may endanger underg round sources of drinking water. SUPPLEMENT AL INVENT ORY INFORMATION: Per 40 CFR Part 144.27, EPA may require owners and operators of injection wells to submit supplemental information pertaining to the operation of their injection well(s) if requested by EPA. Such information may include, well construction, history of use, depth to seasonal high water table, proximity to drinking water wells and surface water bodies, proximity to other injection wells, and proximity to federal, state, or tribally-designated Source Water areas, Sole Source Aquifers, or other sensitive ground water areas. 4. CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION: EPA has prom ulgated regulations to protect the confidentiality of the business information it receives. These regulations are set forth in 40 CFR part 2, subpar t B, and in the Federal Register at 41 Fed. Reg. 36902 (9/1/76), 43 Fed. Reg. 4000 (9/8/78) and 50 Fed. Reg. 51661 (10/18/85). A claim of business confidentiality may be asser ted in the manner specified in 40 CFR Section 2203(b) for part or all of the information requested. EPA will disclose business information covered by such a claim only as author ized under 40 CFR part 2, subpar t B. If no claim accompanies the business information at the time the EPA receiv es it, EPA may make it available to the public without further notice. No facility may withhold from EPA any information on the grounds that it is confidential business information. Additional information regarding these requirements can be obtained at www .epa.gov/saf ewater (see "Underg round Injection Control, Class V") or by calling the Safe Drinking Water Act Hotline, (800) 426-4791, EST. To contact EPA Region 9's UIC Prog ram, call (415) 744- 2250. NOTE: State and local governments may have more string ant ground water protection regulations. Form adapted from OMB No. 2040.0042, Region 9 version of EPA Form 7520-16 , Page 3 of 3 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA FAX ~'ansmittal Cover Sheet Bakersfield Fire Dept. Office of Environmental Services ._1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 FAX~No. (661..) 326-0576 · Bus No. (:6~Q 326-3979 TO: 'l'~ A~.-¢ -~q~o~ COMPANY: ['j"r-~c FROM: ~~zr> C~,~s, FAX No. ~"%-~. z~?. '5~o¢ COMMENTS: CosTco ~,]; _' ." 0 0 3 'X_d_ b~t~nce$ '1house Road March 30, 1998 Sparks Estate cio Retail Investors 4550 California Avenue, Suite K-303 Bakersfield, California 93309 ReVs ISSUED TO I-GO VAN AND STORAGE AND MR. DARRELL SPARKS RF_~ARDINO TANK 50001, 2800 STANDARD STREET, BAKERS FIELD, CALIFORNIA Pete l~bon · ~overnor Secrttcny far Znvironmewal Proteedon To Whom It May Concern: This will respond to the March 20, 199g letter to me regarding the status of the violations alleged al: I-Go Van and Storage, 2800 Standard $t.~ ................. '~ ..... Bakersfield. Kern County. The specific request w~ that the Departing[ review information submitted for the purpose of resolving the violations in two prev~ou.sJy issued Reports of Viola[tea (Revs) as well as review and approve a plan to remove any potentially haT~rdous waste currently in Tank The March 20 letter also rcf¢~'¢nces recent contacts with various staff of. the Department concerning the best cour~ of action to move forward with the proposed project ~ well as con~act~ with the City of Bakersfield and the... Regional Water Quality Control l~oard concerning dirposition of the water and sludge phases of lhe waz~ In ~he tank. The Waste Cla$_eificafion Information submitted by Kennedy/$enlra Consultants also describes the presence of an oil phase of waste in the tank. Although presumptively hazardous, analytical data submitted indicates this phase to m'cct non. hazardous criteria. The proposeA removal action states that the waste will be recycled at the DeMenno gerdoon facility located in. Cnmpton, Los Angeles County. Based upon all of this information the Department has no objection to the planned removal 6f the tank contents. The Information provided also satisfies the requiremenL~ of the ROVs issued by the Department in 1988 an/:l 1990. In the apparent abs~c~ of Mr. Sparks and thc financial information provided concerning the parcel, these ROVs will be considered as closed. OH:Chi DH33.03! Sparks F~tate March 30, 1998 Page 2 Tn ~sstst us in adequately cloaing 0~u~i.. fil~, please submit any and all inlrorm~tlion documenting the f'mal removal and disposition of Iht tank and thc tank contents. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Dalc Hovcrman, of' my slat'f~ at (209) 297-3948. Sincerely, Gerald H. White Unit Chlcr Statewide Compliance Division · DH :C.M 'DFL13.~I Rent edia1,4 ction Report Sparks Estate and,4djacent Properties Bakersfield, CA. SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. File Number 01-9775 Decentber 3, 2001 Page 25 The analytical results of the excavation Soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons or metals are left in the soil at this location. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The excavation was backfilled with clean import material and compacted to 90% relative density '-t}p. to match existing grade by FOSS. The stockpiled soil (approximately 50 tons) was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Mckittrick Waste facility under a non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). No stained soil was identified within a 15' radius of the suspected location of boring B-15. This minor petroleum hydrocarbon staining may have dissipated over time. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusions ' - Based on field observations and analytical results of waste materials collected during this Remedial Action the following is concluded by SEI: 1) The 2.1 million gallon AST has been emptied, cleaned and dismantled per all local, State and Federal regulations. The resulting non-hazardous waste streams were approximately 84,800 gallons of oil, 348,050 gallons of wastewater, and 677,400 gallons of oily sludge which were taken to various permitted disposal/recycling facilities under non-hazardous waste manifests. The soil beneath the AST pad had petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a depth of approximately 1' to 2' bgs., which was removed and disposed of as non-hazardous waste at permitted facilities. Estimated quantity of this non-hazardous soil is 500 tons. 2) The five (5) UST's, multiple oil well drilling sumps, a large oil sump, one (1) Class V dry well/clarifier, two (2) septic tanks, and two (2) minor oil stained areas were excavated and removed from the former Sparks Estate parcels during this remedial action. Soil samples were collected from all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. Only two (2) small areas along the northern extent of the large oil sump still contain petroleum hydrocarbons greater than 1000 ppm. Both of these areas (S-Sump-NECRNR-I' at 3400 ppm TRPH and S-SUmp-NSWW-2' at 1300 ppm TRPH) were approved to be left in-place by the BFDES based on the area being covered by asphaltic surfaces in the future. In addition, further excavation northward would have encountered a live high-pressure asbestos/concrete water line near the northern property line at the 2800 Standard Street site. An estimated 4000 tons of petroleum-impacted soil was removed and disposed of from these excavations at permitted facilities under non- hazardous waste manifests. Remedial Action Report Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties Bakersfield, CA. ~I~ILS ENGINEERING. INC. File Number 01-9775 December 3, 2001 Page 26 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Petroleum impacted soil limited to the top 1-foot at the site can be left in-place, but must be covered by asphaltic surfaces in the future. A total of 4 water wells and 3 monitoring wells have been abandoned per Kern County Environmental Health regulations. Three (3) abandoned oil wells were re-abandoned during this remedial action. Variances were granted by the DOG to stop the re-abandonment's at shallower depths then proposed due to difficult drilling conditions. Surface seals and a well-head leak test were approved by the DOG. The three (3) abandoned oil wells do not meet the current DOG abandonment regulations. According to DOG personnel no additional abandonment work is required on these wells. The BFDES has requested that a map of the three (3) oil well locations be prepared to identify their exact location at the site. The oil wells must be placed in planter areas for any future access. Miscellaneous oily waste debris, drums of waste oil, oil filters, solvents and other liquids were disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at appropriate permitted facilities under hazardous waste manifests. This included sixteen (16) 55-gallon drums and two (2) 10-yard roll-off bins. At the former Glenn Rose facility a steamcleaner sump, a septic tank, two (2) oil- stained areas and asbestos containing materials were removed under appropriate permits. Soil samples were collected from all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. Non-RCRA hazardous soil due to elevated lead concentrations were identified at the steamcleaner sump, the septic tank and in soil from excavation GR-EX1 totaling an estimated 65 tons. This soil was disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous waste at an appropriate disposal facility under hazardous waste manifests. Non-hazardous soil (3 tons) from the GR-EX2 excavation was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at appropriate disposal/recycling facilities. Asbestos containing materials (sheet flooring, mastic, drywall joint compound, asbestos/concrete pipe) were removed from both the former Glenn Rose facility and the former Maaco facility by ASI under appropriate permits. The resulting waste was disposed of at a permitted facility as Non-RCRA hazardous waste under a hazardous waste manifest. Two (2) floor drains, a septic tank, two (2) dry wells, and a clarifier were removed from the former Maaco facility during this remedial action under appropriate permits. The two (2) dry wells and the clarifier were not originally identified at the site by previous investigations. They were encountered during the demolition or remedial activities being conducted .at the site. Soil samples were collected and analyzed from Remedial Action Report Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties Bakersfield, CA. LS ENGINEERING, INC. File Number 01-9775 December 3, 2001 Page 27 all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm and to characterize the removed soil. Stained material (soil and sludge) from the two (2) floor drains and the clahfier were identified as containing metals (lead or lead and mercury) at Non-RCRA hazardous concentrations. An estimated total of 16 tons of soil/sludge were disposed of as Non-RCRA hazardous ----waste at appropriate permitted facilities under hazardous waste manifests. 10) Approximately 50 tons of non-hazardous soil was removed from excavation S-EX1 at previous soil boring B-16. Soil samples were collected and analyzed from the excavation to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. The removed soil was disposed/recycled at an appropriate permitted facility under non-hazardous waste manifests. No staining in the near surface soil was identified in the former area of boring B-15. This former stained area may have dissipated over time or have been removed by previous activities at the site. 11) The estimated total of all non-hazardous petroleum-impacted soil disposed/recycled from the site during this remedial action is 5,662 tons (213 loads). Official final totals are pending receipt .of a few more non-hazardous waste weigh tickets from the transporters. Total of all Non-RCRA hazardous soil disposed of during this remedial action is 82.73 tons. 4.2 Recommendations SEI has the following recommendations for the site: 1) Based on the above conclusions the site has been successfully remediated in compliance with ENSR's RAW and SEI's Addendum/ti to the RAW both approved by the BFDES prior to conducting the field work. 2) If significantly oil-stained soil is encountered deeper than 1-foot bgs. during future grading or construction activities, the stained area should be evaluated by SEI personnel to determine the appropriate remedial action. 3) No other additional remedial activities are recommended at this time at the site. Remedial Action Report Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties Bakersfield, C~I. ~OILS ENGINEERING, INC. File Number 01-9775 December $, 2001 Page 28 5.0 LIMITATIONS This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Costco Wholesale as it relates to the property described. The discussion and conclusions presented in this report are based on: - The observations of field personnel. - The results of laboratory tests performed by Positive Lab Services of Los Angeles, California - Our understanding of the regulations of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, the DTSC and the EPA. Possible variations in the soil or groundwater conditions which may exist beyond the points explored in this investigation might effect the validity of this report unless those variations or conditions come to our attention and are reviewed and assimilated into the conclusions and recommendations of this report. Also, changes in the hydrologic conditions found could occur with time due to variations in rainfall, temperature, regional water usage, or other factors, any of which could affect this report. The services performed by SEI have been conducted in a manner consistent with the levels of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in California. The absence of contamination on or beneath the property cannot be guaranteed by this report. SEI is not responsible for any contamination or hazardous material found on the property. No other warranty expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions concerning this Remedial Action Report please contact SEI at (661) 831-5100. Sincerely, J. Becl~r, R.G. 5076, E.G. 2238, REA Il 20074 Environmental Division Manager Attachments: VOLUME 1 of 2 Plate 1, Location Map Plate 2, General Plot Plan Remedial Action Report Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties Bakersfield, CA. LS ENGINEERING, File Number 01-9775 December 3, 2001 Page 29 INC. Plate 3, 2800 Standard Street UST, Clarifier & Septic System Excavations Plate 3A, 2800 Standard Street, Large Oil Sump Excavation Plate 4, 3650 Rosedale Highway/Former Maaco Plot Plan Plate 5, 3880 Rosedale Highway/Former Glenn Rose Plot Plan Plate 6, Miscellaneous Small Excavation Areas (ES-10, EB-1, B-16, Drilling Sumps, Bitner #1 and Bitner #2) Appendix A - Regulatory Letters and Permits Appendix B - U.S. EPA Inventory of Injection Wells forms Appendix C - Pictures of Field Work Appendix D - ENSR Site History and Subsurface Investigation Report (Summary Report) dated March 5, 2001. VOLUME 2 of 2 Appendix E - Analytical Reports & Chain of Custody Forms Appendix F - Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Waste Manifests CC: Costco Wholesale, C/O MulvannyG2 Architecture, Attn: Mr. Jeff Wilson Costco Wholesale, Todd Bartok 12/11/01 09:39 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 2377 15592973904 12/11 09:33 05'33 8 OK SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. December 4, 2001 TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA. 93301 FROM: BOB BECKER Soils Engineering, Inc. 4400 Yeager Way Bakersfield, CA, 93313 SUBJECT: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT - Revised Page 25 For Proposed Costco Facility in Bakersfield, CA. NOTE: Attached is a revised page 25 for the REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT for the proposed Costco facility in Bakersfield, CA.. A typo in the second bullet of section 4.1 changes the sentence from "Only two (20 small areas ---" to "Only two (2) small areas ---". Please replace page 25 with the new one provided. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. If you have any questions concerning this Report please contact SEI at (661) 831- 5100. Thanks Bob cc: Costco Wholesale, Mr. Todd Bartok (2) 4400 YEAGER WAY · BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93313 ' PHONE (661) 831-5100 · FAX: (661) 831-2111 I I I SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Remedial Action Report Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties Bakersfield, CA. File Number 01-9775 December 3, 2001 Page 25 The analytical results of the excavation soil samples indicate no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I or metals are left in the soil at this location. See Table 1 for analytical results and Appendix E for analytical reports and Chain of Custody documents. The excavation was backfilled with clean import material and compacted to 90% relative density up to match existing grade by FOSS. The stockpiled soil (approximately 50 tons) was disposed of as non-hazardous waste at Waste Managements/Mckittrick Waste facility under a non-hazardous waste manifests (see Appendix F). No stained soil was identified within a 15' radius of the suspected location of boring B-15. This minor petroleum hydrocarbon staining may have dissipated over time. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusions Based on field observations and analytical results of waste materials collected during this Remedial Action the following is concluded by SEI: 1) The 2.1 million gallon AST has been emptied, cleaned and dismantled per all local, State and Federal regulations. The resulting non-hazardous waste streams were approximately 84,800 gallons of oil, 348,050 gallons of wastewater, and 677,400 gallons of oily sludge which were taken to various permitted disposal/recycling facilities under non-hazardous waste manifests. The soil beneath the AST pad had petroleum hydrocarbon contamination to a depth of approximately 1' to 2' bgs., which was removed and disposed of as non-hazardous waste at permitted facilities. Estimated quantity of this non-hazardous soil is 500 tons. 2) The five (5) UST's, multiple oil well drilling sumps, a large oil sump, one (1) Class V dry well/clarifier, two (2) septic tanks, and two (2) minor oil stained areas were excavated and removed from the former Sparks Estate parcels during this remedial action. Soil samples were collected from all of these excavations to verify the successful removal of petroleum hydrocarbons above 1000 ppm. Only two (2~ small areas along the northern extent of the large oil sump still contain petroleum hydrocarbons greater than 1000 ppm. Both of these areas (S-Sump-NECRNR-I' at 3400 ppm TRPH and S-Sump-NSWW-2' at 1300 ppm TRPH) were approved to be left in-place by the BFDES based on the area being covered by asphaltic surfaces in the future. In addition, further excavation northward would have encountered a live high-pressure asbestos/concrete water line near the northern property line at the 2800 Standard Street site. An estimated 4000 tons of petroleum-impacted soil was removed and disposed of from these excavations at permitted facilities under non- hazardous waste manifests. I 12/11/01 08:48 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 2374 15594455910 12/11 08:43 04'24 6 OK BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIA FAX TI;ansmittal Cover Sheet Bakersfield Fire Dept. Office of Environmental Se~rvices 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 FAX No. (.~.~..) 326-0576 · Bus No. (:~.) 326-397 TO: FROM: ].~,.,...~s~> ~,--~,,,.~-"5 FAX NO. ~'~5-~ ..: Z.{q S--.' ,T~ rO COMMENTS: November 13,2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 vOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 vOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Robert J. Becker Soils Engineering, Inc. 4400 Yeager Way Bakersfield, Ca 93313 RE: New Costco Wholesale Facility, 2800 Standard Street, Bakersfield California Dear Mr. Becker: This will confirm our telephone conversation of Thursday, November 8, 2001, regarding identification marking of abandoned wells. In lieu of a surface marker, you may use a hyper accurate foot print map showing fixed longitude and latitude to identify abandoned oil wells. This map must be kept with the property owner on site, and a copy furnished to this department. Should you have anymore questions, please feel free to contact me at 661- 326-3190. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey Director of Prevention Services by: Steve Underwood Fire Inspector/Environmental Code Enforcement Officer SBU/dm OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ~''~ 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (661) 326-3979 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION SITE '~"e~.k.. 'a~[D.~ ADDRESSo~O~"r~ '$''~ ZIPCODE?~O~ APN FACILITY NAME . CROSS S'~-REET ~ ff_n.~l~,.~e~ TANK OWNER/OPERATOR 0~.~ ~, esso (. ~,i) c~.oe, at") . ,_ ._PHONE NO. MAILING ADDRESS '.4'.45"o 0~,h~tn A-o~ cITY ~,~e..,~.~D ZIP e'l~>}o '~ CONTRACTOR INFORMATION COMPANY ~:~ ~....Nutr0m~q',~ PHONENO.~g:~I-.~).-~O~ . LICENSE NO. '71{:,,,.~ I CITY ~.~,.,~...¢~,.~ ZIP ,:~$~<b "~ ~S~CE C~E~ ~t~ $~ ~W~i~ ~ WO~ENS CO~ NO. [~0~ 1~ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION COMPANY ~"~:~t k....5 ~ett~tt,/tn% PHONE NO. ~./.o[ ~5J"-5~/0C-) LICENSENO. ~o-~5~'.8~---~~-- ADDRESS q~CnT.) Ye-~c,_e~ .a CITY B~K~4'~LO ZIP ~3~O~ ~S~CE C~ER _~~ ~ b , WO~MENS CO~ NO..~[--6 ~9 ~ TANK CLEANING INFORMATION COMPANY r-~,.~. Et$,:tce~m~ .~ero:e.-:, PHONE NO. 6~t ' ~D~SS ~O ~.~c~O~ ~e C~ ~k~ WASTE ~SPO~TE~ ~E~IC~TION ~BER ~P ~_~m ~~ N~E OF ~SA~ mSPOS~ FAC~H~ ~~~ (~K3 FACILI~ IDE~ICA~ON ~ER ~ ~ { O~/~~l OA zip TANK TRANSPORTER INFORMATION COMPANY .%terX'~, ln~.e'-tnL ~,Y_O,.-, PHONENO. ~27--7o'/3 ,biCENSF,.No. ADDRESS IL;~E) ~. ~rtI~e l~"n.m~- CITY B4'i~-t'~.LO ~ TANK DESTINATION 151 ~ r¢,~ ~I~_T~L..~ex zm q TANK INFORMATION CHEMICAL DATES TANK NO. AGE STORED STORED~ ~ -- For , u t t CHEMICAL PREVIOUSLY STORED THE APPLICANT HAS RECEIVED, UNDERSTANDS, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT AND ANY OTHER STATE, LOCAL AND FEDERAL REGULAT IONS. THIS FOBM HAS BEEN COMP LETED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS TRUE AP'PROVI~D BY: APPLICANT NAME (P ) THIS APPLICATION WILL BECOME A PERMIT WHEN APPROVED '2.1 FOSS Tom Hollenbeck Project Manager tehollenbeck@ fossenv.com w w w . f-~ s s e n v . c o.m 1620 E. Brtmdage Ln. Bakersfield ('A 93307 k-./ Emergency Res~nse 1-800-FE SPILL Phonc: 661-322-8174 Fax: 661-322-8436 Pager: 661-634-6460 Cell Phone: 661-201-9180 CITY OF ;FIELD PE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Project Info: Desc~prion og Work to be Peffo~d Project Locaaon: [CATION Address Suite Number Tract Number Lot Number Applicant is (Please Circle One) ? Owner ~ Arch / Eng L~; N~e Firs; N~e Suite NmDer Address Ci~ t Zio Phone Number Other Fax Number I L~t N~e (Comp~yName~ First N~e Ad.ess m Suite Number Ci~ ) Zip Phone Number . Fax N~mber Contractors License Number License Exviration Date Arch/Eng: ~ o, {.._S E~...~,,~,,,,~..~ ~ First Name Last Name M~tOO '~ e~5¢ C' Lk-) evs'~ite Number Address ('- . City. Zip Phone :Number Fax Number Architect / En=ineer License Number License Exrfiration Date OFFICE USE ONLY Permit Number - Date Applied ~/ _/___ I'-- ?~I'B. -8 ' Former Oil Surer Dirt Concrete Foundations Asphalt & Concrete Piles North Water Wel I a'~25 E ectrical Fuel C;~nopyN .~ & Telephone Box Dispensers % '"rain - Former /Above-ground .................. .................. ..... ,=,& ,"-', I PARCEL 38 T9 Drili~g7Sump ~b ~ Shop _ I I Pipeline PARCEL 39 ~ . B-29 (UW-2)e~ll~--~l~1. Buildil g I~'Office Trailer Drilling Surl;~.~,.== \ 4 Undergroun~..~'2..7~ . B-1 * ~ arifier & Dry Well I B31 ~ TS ~'1 PARCEL 37 i. Dirt Storage Tanks / ~epnc lanK . ,;/e~ ~ B-30 (MW-3) F~ !'--':'_ ~1::~T10 ~ ~itner #2 (2-8K, 2-10K) Tlr:llCO #1.W_a.st..e O1! el Vacant Field c ~ 3_O.. ' Vacant Field i ],UUU gallon n Weeds ~] Tll Weeds PARCEL 12 · c I aitner #1 F PARCEL 40 Mobile Office Trail~(,B'28 (MW-l) St°raj~i~ Bldg5 e I Former AGT e Weeds -'-- I ,~"'~"~ 6 n 55-gallon I ~,,.e....l~'7~ . Ce S°uthWa~:~rWellI Sump Drums Concret~'Pad B-14 21 Water E Main Fence e-~"- 2.1 Million Gall~r Fence AGT ' ' Hazardous Waste Stor.~rea Parcel 7 Parcel 8 Parcel 41 Former Maaco: Glenn Rose , Engine Seaton Property i f LEGEND See Plate 4 For Detaill + Former Oil Well ~ · Soil Bori.ng See Plate 3 For Detail ~ Location I t.....M...o..n.~y...M..a.~ ........ k~Approx. Scale 1" = 150~/ SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 4700 District Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93313 DATE: 11/2/98 PROJECT NUMBER: 8733 Sparks Estate Parcels 12, 37,38, 39, 40 BAKERSFILED CALIFORNIA PLOT PLAN PLATE 2 8-25 · Former Oil Sump Area .......... nTl.. Dirt Weeds N Suspected Former AGT Area 13 Electrical Canopy & melep, hone Box .... _Oil Change/ Drain --% I-Ual ulspensers.., i. ro.u.gtl . ~ . ~,1..~ "~_a~ [.-'Building,;{{I.~ti I-LL O.~ce 8-29 (MW-2)"~~ ............... :';':':';';'; ; ""_.1.. - 4 Underground TRICO#1 Septic/anl( B-l~^jWell Storage Tanks Former Oil Well (2 -8K, 2-10K) Waste Oil Tan~k ~'-4 "r'B30 (MW-3) T6 PARCEL 12 Suspected Former AGT Area~ T5 Mobile Office Trailer South Water Well Approx. Scale 1'=75' 1,000 gallon · B-3 .~B-28 (MW-l) Sump Storage B~ ~ Assessment Trench Former Oil Well )Contaminated Soil To be Removed Monitoring well · Soil Boring ~,~ PLATE SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PARCEL 12 4700 District Blvd. 2800 Standard St r~ Bakersfield, CA 93313 Bakersfield, CA. PROJECT NUMBER: 97-8384 Plot Plan Fence DIRT PARCEL 7 ~ 1~-17 Stained Soil N Fence Stained Soi~ (~t B-15 Miscellaneous Cargo Containers PARCEL 8 '1 Steam Cleanej/Sump I~ot Solvent Tank I ~oncete Pad ~eptic~Tan kLll:o.'z_~ ??:....~-- I Water Wel F '"?;'"'"';-~""-'""".'-'."~.'.'- = . Glen Rose Engine e ~ n i!!i!i'??;'"~'~'~i'~'~'"'iil;ilill ! c AsphaE 3880 'SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 4700 District Blvd, Bakersfield, CA 93313 PROJECT NUMBER: 98-8733 DIRT Stained Soil (B-16 Bill Board Parcels 7 & 8 ~.A~E Glen Rose Engine Service & Seaton Property 3880 Rosedale Hwy. & Lot East /~ Bakersfield, CA Plot Plan SEATON PROPERTY (()Legend Contaminated · Soil Boring ROSEDALE HIGHWAY Soil To Remove Sca~e 1'--50' N Seaton Property Fence Debris Pile o Water Well WEEDS & DIRT Square Ma~lnetic Anomaly o Power Pole I AsphaE WEEDS Gas Meter _ ~-ormer PARCEL 41 Hazardous Material Storage Area F e n Asphalt C ~fieptic System (~Storm Drain Hungry Hunter B;1 · ~B-18 M'PB~Former Paint k', ,',r,/FIr=D-N4 I . .~, .~,[,;,;~;{~ Former D~Well , Former ,'FloorDrains I"~', Shop ,,~~ Concrete & Brick ROSEDALE HIGHWAY Boring Scale 1 '=75' SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. 4700 District Blvd. Bakersfield, CA 93313 PROJECT NUMBER: 98-8733 Parcel 41 Former Maaco& Vacant Lot 3650 Rosedale Hwy. & Lot West Bakersfield, CA Plot Plan PLATE '4 D FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 21dl "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 ~H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 August 8, 2001 Mr. Robert J. Becket, R.G. Soils Engineering, Inc. 4400 Yeager Way Bakersfield Ca 93313 Revised Groundwater Well Sampling Workplan Rosedale Hwy at Standard Street in Bakersfield Dear Mr. Becker: This is to notify you that the Groundwater Well Sampling Workplan addendum to the Proposed Costco Site Remedial Action Workplan (Former ENSR Project No. 8727-049) is approved. The one comment I have is that the submission of an acceptable groundwater sampling workplan was an express conditions of approval for the Proposed Costco Site Remedial Action Workplan in full, as referenced in my letter of April 19, 2001 addressed to Lita Freeman of ENSR (attached). Please be advised that approval of the workplan shall, in no way, limit or preclude any further investigation from being ordered by this office, or any other agency, as site conditions may dictate during the course of the remedial actions. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of any sampling or remedial activities so that I may be present to personally witness the actions taken. Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under direct oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously approved. If you have any questions, please call me at (661) 326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Registered Geologist No. 7239 Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm attachment cc: J. Whiting, RWQCB BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 Business Phone {661) 326-3979 · FAX {661) 326-0576 FAX Transmittal TO: COMPANY: ~_.~,,../'~ R.._ FAX No. S~O "/'4g. ~o") q<~ FROM: COMMENTS: I ~C_~ a'o ~ ccc.~,2 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 April 19, 2001 Lita D. Freeman, REA II ENSR International i 20 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120 meda, CA 94502 : Confirmation Groundwater Sampling at Proposed Costco Site Rosedale Highway at Standard Street in Bakersfield Dear Ms. Freeman, This Office accepts your proposal to conduct "adequate pre-remediation sampling" of the groundwater as referenced on page 5 of your April 18, 2001 letter. With regard to the additional groundwater information provided in that letter and attachments Ihereto (i.e., Kennedy Jenks report of 22 October 1998 and Soils Engineering report ~f November 12, 1998), which was omitted fi'om the earlier workplan, please be ~dvised that each report is to include the pertinent information from precious reports, as necessary and available, to assure that it may be reviewed independently. Please submit a Groundwater Sampling Workplan Addendum to this Office pursuant to our letter of April 10, 2001. The Groundwater Sampling Workplan Addendum will be reviewed for adequacy by this Office prior to any approval of the Proposed Costco Site Remedial Action Workplan in full. If you have any questions, please call me at (661) 326-3979. Sincerely, RALPH E. HUEY, Director By: Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Occ'~'~' of Environmental Services K. Zimmerman, Esq., Greenberg, et al. 04/20/01 09:58 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 9644 13105530687 04/20 09:57 00'58 2 OK April 18, 2001 ENSR International 1220 Avenida Acas0 Camadllo, CA 93012-8738 (805) 388-3775 FAX (805) 388-3577 www. ensr, com Ralph E. Huey, Director Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 08727-049 Subject: Costco - Proposed Site - Rosedale Highway Bakersfield Dear Mr. Huey: As you know, ENSR Corporation ("ENSR") has been retained by Costco Wholesale Corporation ("Costco") as an environmental consultant in connection with Costco's proposed purchase, remediation and development of the above-referenced site ("Site"). This letter responds to the Bakersfield Fire Department's letter of April 10, 2001 ("Approval Letter") approving ENSR's remediation workplan ("Remediation Workplan") for the Site, but requiring that Costco, submit an "addendum which addresses confirmation groundwater sampling prior to commencement of work" ("Groundwater Addendum"). The Approval Letter indicates that the Groundwater Addendum is necessary because: The Remediation Workplan does not provide "an adequate characterization of applicable groundwater parameters including depth to groundwater, gradient, direction of flow, current concentrations of any previously detected contaminants of concern, [and] distance to nearest municipal water supply wells .... "; and The "[p]rior detection [of petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether)] warrants further current study as part of the [Workplan];" Previous Site assessment and characterization activities (collectively "Site Investigations"), which are summarized below, should address the Bakersfield Fire Department's ("Fire Dept.'s") concerns regarding the characterization of the groundwater parameters. In addition, the exhaustive sampling of the groundwater under the Site, which is described below, argues against "further... study" of the Iow concentrations of contaminants found therein. However, ENSR is prepared to submit a pre-remediation groundwater sampling workplan ("Sampling Workplan") if, after reviewing this letter and the attachments thereto, tbe Fire Dept. still believes that additional groundwater sampling is necessary. Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 2 The Site Investigations Adequately Address the Fire Dept.'s Concerns Regarding The Characterization of the Groundwater Parameters. Previous Site Investigations adequately address the Fire Dept.'s concerns regarding the characterization of the groundwater parameters. Each parameter is characterized in greater detail below: A. Depth to Groundwater Depth to groundwater under the Site has apparently varied widely over time. According to the Kern County Water Agency, groundwater in the immediate vicinity of the Site was between 24 feet and 66 feet below ground surface (bgs) in March 1997. In "drier years, like 1977, the depth to unconfined groundwater was 200 feet." See Phase I ESA Report/ Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties (October 22, 1997) prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants ("Phase I Report."), at p. 23, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In 1998, Soils Engineering, Inc. ("SEI") encountered groundwater under the Site in a northern water well at a depth of 21.3 feet bgs. and at 62 feet bgs. in a southern water well. SEI also encountered groundwater under the Site in monitoring wells at depths of 19.52 feet to 19.94 feet below the top of casing elevations. See SEI Phase II Report (November 12, 1998), prepared by SEI ("Phase II Report"), at pp 19-20, which is attached hereto, as Exhibit B. Finally, in 2000, Costco measured depth to groundwater under the Site at 28 to 42 feet bgs. in borings advanced along the southern end of the Site. B. Gradient SEI calculated the groundwater gradient at approximately 0.0037 feet/foot on the northern portion of the Site based on water level measurements in groundwater wells in October 1998 (SEI "Phase II Report", pp. 20). C. Direction of Flow The direction of groundwater flow in the area of the Site was determined by Kennedy Jenks in 1997 "to be generally toward the northwest." See Phase I Report, at p. 23 (Exhibit B). Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 3 Based on work it performed, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. determined that the Site exhibits generally a SSE topographic gradient. See EDR- RADIUS MAP with GeoCheck for Sparks/2888 Standard Property (January 15, 1999) prepared by EDR ("EDR Report"), at p. 3, which is attached as an appendix to the Phase I Report (Exhibit A). Based on work it performed, SEI determined that the Site exhibits a southwestern hydrogeologic gradient (0.0037 feet/feet in a S81W direction). See Phase II Report, at pp.15, 20 and Plate No. 5 (Exhibit B). Concentrations of Contaminants The concentrations of all contaminants found in the groundwater appear in tables summarizing the sampling analytical data. ("Sampling Tables"), which are attached hereto as Exhibit C. As discussed below, these concentrations do not appear to be at levels that warrant monitoring or remediation. Location of Municipal Wells Since private water purveyors supply drinking water from groundwater wells to some of the residents of Bakersfield and Kern County, it is unclear what the Approval Letter means by the term "municipal wells." For clarity, we are providing herewith the EDR Report, which contains a well survey depicting the locations of the closest wells and indicating that there are no "state, federal, or public water supply wells" closer than approximately one-quarter mile from the Site. See EDR Report (Appendix to Exhibit A).~ ~According to information recently provided to 'ENSR by the State of California Department of Water Resources ("DWR"), and the California Water Service ("CWS"), the closest drinking water well appears to be located approximately 1/4 mile west of the subject property at the Fairhaven Water Company facility located at 2827 Fairhaven, Bakersfield, California. The DWR and CWS also indicated that there is a well just east of the Site which was drilled in 1955 for the Kern County Dept. of Public Works in the area occupied by the Hungry Hunter restaurant. On April 16, 2001, ENSR contacted the KCDPW and was referred to the Kern County Environmental Health Department for information about any wells in the area of the Site. Later that same day, ENSR contacted Tom Hardy of the Kern County Environmental Health Department, Ken Hedrick of CWS, and Tom Haslebacher of Kern County Water Agency for information on this well. Messrs. Hardy, Hetrick and Haslebackher had no information on this well. Mr. Hardy noted that the well may have been destroyed prior to the late 1980s when the Kern County Environmental Health Department first began issuing well destruction permits. Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 4 II. ENSR's Proposal To Conduct Additional "Pre-Remediation" Sampling to Address the Fire Dept.'s Remaining Concerns Regarding Groundwater Contamination With respect to petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE, groundwater sampling at multiple locations and depths has established that these contaminants are either not present, or present in concentrations which should not require monitoring, let alone remediation. In summary, SEI collected groundwater samples from the Site's North Well, Maaco Well, MW-l, MW-2 and MW-3 in October 1998. Analyses of these samples did not reveal the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits with the exception of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (i.e., TPH-g) detected at a concentration of 64 I~g/L, MTBE at concentrations up to 2 IJg/L, xylenes at concentrations up to 3.8 I~g/L and toluene at concentrations up to 0.91 I~g/L. Moreover, analysis of groundwater samples collected by ENSR from borings located across the site in 2000/2001 did not reveal the presence of the chemical constituents noted above (i.e., TPH-g, MTBE, xylenes and toluene) at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits.2 That having been said, ENSR, on behalf of Costco, would like to address the Fire Dept.'s remaining concerns regarding groundwater contamination. To that end, ENSR is prepared to submit a pre-remediation groundwater sampling workplan ("Sampling Workplan") if, after reviewing this letter and the attachments thereto, the Fire Dept. still believes that additional groundwater sampling is necessary. More specifically, ENSR is proposing to sample the groundwater in the Site's monitoring and abandoned drinking water wells prior to Costco's purchasing the Site and conducting remediation activities thereon. As set forth in ENSR's letter of April 2, 2001 to the Fire Dept., there are compelling reasons for sampling before and not after the proposed clean-up of the Site. Among other reasons, postponing destruction of the wells until after the Site has been cleaned up to take samples therefrom will require the re-mobilization of contractors to destroy those wells, and significantly delay Costco's closure efforts. 2As you know, the concentrations of MTBE which were detected in the groundwater under the Site are far below the primary and secondary maximum contaminant levels found in California's Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring Regulations, which are 13 IJg/I and 5 I~g/I, respectively. See Cal. Code Reg. §§ 64444 and 64449. Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 5 III. Conclusion In light of the information, ENSR respectfully requests that the Fire Dept. modify its Groundwater Addendum by: (1) acknowledging that the groundwater parameters have been adequately characterized; and (2)clarifying that no additional groundwater sampling is required or, in the alternative, adequate pre-remediation sampling will satisfy the groundwater confirmation requirement. So that Costco might proceed with its efforts to acquire, remediate and develop the Site without further delays, Costco asks that the Fire Dept. respond to this letter (if possible) by April 20, 2001. Sincerely, Senior Project Manager Attachments: as stated (via separate cover) KZ:mkd Sally W. Bilodeau, R.G., C.E.G. Senior Program Manager Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services APR-18-2001 15:15 ENSR INT'L/£AMARILLO 805 588 3S?? P.02 April 18, 2001 ENSR International 1220 Avenida Acaso Camadllo, CA 93012-8738 (805) 388-3775 FAX (805) 388-3577 wWW, 8~$I'.ColTI Ralph E. Huey, Director Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services 171 5 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Re: 08727-049 Subject: Costco - Proposed Site - Rosedale Highway Bakersfield Dear Mr. Huey: As you know, ENSR Corporation ("ENSR") has been retained by Costco Wholesale Corporation ("Costco") as an environmental consultant in.connection with Costco's proposed purchase, remediation and development of the above-referenced site ("Site"). This letter responds to the Bakersfield Fire Department's letter of April 10, 2001 ("Approval Letter") approving ENSR's remediation workplan ("Remediation Workplan") for the Site, but requiring that Costco, submit an "addendum which addresses confirmation groundwater sampling prior to commencement of work" ("Groundwater Addendum"). The .Approval Letter indicates that the Groundwater Addendum is necessary because: The Remediation Workplan does not provide "an adequate characterization of applicable groundwater parameters including depth to groundwater, gradient, direction of flow, current concentrations of any previously detected contaminants of concern, [and]:distance to nearest municipal water suppiy wells .... ";'and The "[p]rior detection [of petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether)] warrants further current study as part of the [Workplan];" Previous Site assessment and characterization activities (collectively "Site InvestigatiOns"), which are summarized below, should address the Bakersfield Fire Department's ("Fire Dept.'s") concerns regai-ding the characterization of the groundwater parameters. In addition, the exhaustive sampling of the groundwater under the Site, which is described below, argues against "further... study" of the low concentrations of contaminants found therein. However, ENSR is prepared to submit a pre-remediation groundwater sampling workplan ("Sampling Workplan") if, after reviewing this letter and the ~" .,chments thereto, the Fire Dept. still believe~ that additional groundwater sampling is necessary. Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Se~ces RPR-18-2001 15:13 ENSR INT'L,"CRPI~RILLO 805 388 3577 P.83 Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 2 The Site Investigations Adequately Address the Fire Dept.'s Concerns Regarding The Characterization of the Groundwater Parameters. Previous Site Investigations adequately address the Fire Dept.'s concerns regarding the characterization of the groundwater parameters. Each parameter is characterized in greater detail below: A. Depth to Groundwater Depth to groundwater under the Site has apparently varied widely over time. According to the Kern County Water Agency, groundwater in the immediate vicinity of the Site was between 24 feet and 66 feet below ground surface (bgs) in March 1997. In "drier years, like 1977, the depth to unconfined groundwater was 200 feet." See Phase I ESA Report/ Sparks Estate and Adjacent Properties (October 22, 1997) prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants ("Phase I Report."), at p. 23, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In 1998, Soils Engineering, Inc. ("SEi") encountered groundwater under the Site in a northern water well at a depth of 21.3 feet bgs. and at 62 feet bgs. in a southern water Well. SEI also encountered groundwater under the Site in monitoring wells at depths of 19.52 feet to 19.94 feet below the top of casing elevations. See SEI Phase II Report (November 12, 1998), prepared by SEI ("Phase I1 Report"), at pp 19-20, which is attached hereto, as Exhibit B. Finally, in 2000, Costco measured depth to groundwater under the Site at 28 to 42 feet bgs. in borings advanced along the southern end of the Site. Cw Gradient SEI calculated the groundwater gradient at approximately 0.0037 feet/foot on the northern portion of the site based on water level measurements in groundwater wells in October 1998 (SEI "Phase I1 Report", pp. 20). Direction of Flow The direction of groundwater flow in the area of the Site was determined by Kennedy Jenks in 1997 "~o be generally toward the northwest." See Phase Report, at p. 23 (Exhibit B). Over 30 Years of Exce//ence in Environmental Services APR-18-~001 15:1~ ENSR INT'L/CAMARILLO 8~ 588 5S?? P.04 Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 3 Based on work it performed, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. determined that the Site exhibits generally a SSE topographic gradient. See EDR- RADIUS MAP with GeoCheck for Sparks/2888 Standard Property (January 15, 1.999) prepared by EDR ("EDR Report"), at p. 3, which is attached as an appendix to the Phase I Report (Exhibit A). Based on work it performed, SEI determined that the Site exhibits a southwestern hydrogeologic gradient (0.0037 feet/feet in a S81W direction). See Phase II Report, at pp.15, 20 and Plate No. 5 (Exhibit B). Concentrations of Contaminants The concentrations of all contaminants found in the groundwater appear in tables summarizing the sampling analytical data. ("Sampling Tables"), which are attached hereto as Exhibit C. As discussed below, these concentrations do not appear to be at levels that warrant monitoring or remediation. Location of Municipal Wells Since private water purveyors supply drinking water from groundwater wells to some of the residents of Bakersfield and Kern County, it is unclear what the Approval Letter means by the term "municipal wells:" For clarity, we are providing herewith the EDR Report, which contains a well survey depicting the locations of the closest wells and indicating that there are no "state, federal, or public water supply wells" closer than approximately one-quarter mile from the Site. See EDR Report (Appendix to Exhibit A).1 ~According to information recently provided to ENSR by the State of California Department of Water Resources ("DWR"), and the California Water Service ("CWS"), the closest drinking water well appears to be located approximately 1/4 mile west of the subject property at the Fairhaven Water Company facility located at 2827 Fairhavan, Bakersfield, California, The DWR and CWS also indicated that there is a well just east of the Site which was drilled in 1955 for the Kern County Dept. of Public Works in the area occupied by the Hungry Hunter restaurant. On April 16, 2001, ENSR contacted the KCDPW and was referred to the Kern County Environmental Health Department for information about any wells in the area of the Site. Later that same day, ENSR contacted Tom Hardy of the Kern County Environmental Health Department, Ken Hedrick of CWS, and Tom Haslebacher of Kern County Water Agency for information on this well, Messrs. Hardy, Hetrick and Haslebackher had no information on this well. Mr. Hardy noted that the wail may have been destroyed prior to the late 1980s when the Kern County Environmental Health Department first be§an issuing well destruction permits. Over 30 Ye~:,. :? of Excellence in Environmental Services APR-18-2001 15:14 ENSR INT'L/CAMARILLO 805 388 3577 P.05 Mr. Ralph E Huey April 18, 2001 Page 4 Il. ENSR's Proposal To Conduct Additional "Pre-Remediation" Sampling to Address the Fire Dept.'s Remaining Concerns Regarding Groundwater Contamination With respect to petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE, groundwater sampling at multiple locations and depths has established that these contaminants are either not present, or present in concentrations which should not require monitoring, let alone remediation. In summary, SEI collected groundwater samples from the Site's North Well, Maaco Well, MW-l, MW-2 and MW-3 in October 1998. Analyses of these samples did not reveal the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits with the exception of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (i.e., TPH-g) detected at a concentration of 64 pg/L, MTBE at concentrations up to 2 .pg/L, xyienes at concentrations up to 3.8 Iug/L and toluene at concentrations up to 0.91 IJg/L. Moreover, analysis of groundwater samples collected by ENSR from borings located across the site in 2000/2001 did not reveal the presence of the chemical constituents noted above (i.e., TPH-g, MTBE, xylenes and toluene) at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits.2 That having been said, ENSR, on .behalf of Costco, would like to address the Fire Dept.'s remaining concerns regarding groundwater contamination. To that end, ENSR is prepared to submit a pre-remediation groundwater sampling workplan ("Sampling Workplan") if, after reviewing this letter and the attachments thereto, the Fire DePt. still believes that additional groundwater sampling is necessary. More specifically, ENSR is proposing to sample the groundwater in the Site's monitoring and abandoned drinking water wells prior.Co Costco's purchasing the Site and conducting rerhediation activities thereon. As set forth in ENSR's letter of April 2, 2001 to the Fire Dept., there are compelling reasons for sampling before and not after the proposed clean-up of the Site. Among other reasons, postponing destruction of the wells until after the Site has been cleaned up to take samples therefrom will require the re-mobilization of contractors to destroy those wells, and significantly delay Costco's closure efforts. 2As you know, the concentrations of MTBE which were detected in the groundwater under the Site are far below the primar~ and secondary maximum contaminant levels found in California's Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring Regulations, which are 13 IJg/l and 5 ~g/I, respectively. See Cal. COde Reg. §§ 64444 and 64449. Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services APR-18-2_001 15:15 ENSR INT'L/CAMARILLO 805 388 ~ Mr. Ralph E. Huey April 18, 2001 Page 5 Iil. Conclusion In light of the information regarding the groundwater parameters provided ahoy.e, and the submission of a Sampling Workplan, ENSR respectfully requests that the Fire Dept. modify its Groundwater Addendum by: (1) acknowledging that the groundwater parameters have been adequately characterized; and (2) clarifying that no additional. groundwater sampling is required or, in the alternative, adequate pre-remediation sampling will satisfy the groundwater confirmation requirement. So that Costco might proceed with its efforts to acquire, remediate and develop the Site without further delays, Costco asks that the Fire Dept. respond to this letter (if possible) by April 20, 2001. Sincerely, R.E.A. II Senior Project Manager Attachments: as stated (via separate cover) KZ:mkd " ilodeau, R.G., C.E.G. Senior Program Manager Over 30 Years of Excellence in E/wironrnental Services TOTAL P.06 GeoTracker Page 1 of l Zoomln ~ © ZoomOut ~ ® Pan aent~ Layers ~. i'~'iS~i-'~ .... ~~' Shu. ~ sites w~tmn ~ ..... of public wells. [] []LUFT Sites [] I~UST. Sites [] ~Public Wells [] ~Highways [] //Major Roads [] //Minor Roads [] //USGS Quads [] S u rface Water [] ~VVatersheds [] ~GW Basins [] t~Vulnerability Map Size: Click on the map to perform the selected action. Street: City: State: ~Zip: i ...................... ; ~ Contact Site Administrator I Road Maps by ETAK Well and LUFT site positions are approximate. Locational accuracy will improve as state agencies and responsible parties obtain and report new information. .: . .../E SRIMAP.DLL?NAME=MOSERVER&ZOOMINLEVEL=8.1 &ZOOMOUTLEVEL=8 &cmd4/5/01 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersl:ield, CA 93301 . VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 April 10, 2001 Lita D. Freeman, REA II ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120 Alameda, CA 94502 RE: Removal Action Workplan, Proposed Costco Site located at 2800 Standard Street and 3650 through 3880 Rosedale Highway Bakersfield, California Dear Ms. Freeman, This Office has reviewed the above referenced workplan, dated February 28, 2001 submitted by ENSR on behalf of Mr. Todd Bartok, Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco). In addition, this Office has previously reviewed an earlier removal action workplan, dated January 23, 2001, and a subsequent Site History and Subsurface Investigation Report, dated March 5, 2001, also prepared and submitted by ENSR. Background Information On or about January 23, 2001, ENSR notified this Office that a removal action workplan was forthcoming for removal actions on site. On February 6, 2001, ENSR conducted two additional boring~ (EB-13 & 14) which were advanced to groundwater for collection of soil and groundwater samples in the vicinity west of the former Maaco building where the proposed Costco fuel facility was being planned at that time. On or about February 28, 2001, a second Removal Action Workplan was submitted by ENSR on behalf of Costco. This February 28, 2001 revision of the January 23, 2001 workplan incorporated the necessary corrections this Office had referenced in our February 7, 2001 letter. Borings EB-13 & 14 were not addressed in the February 28, 2001 workplan. On March 9, 2001, a meeting with ENSR in our office was held to review the findings associated with EB-14. A supplemental Site History and Lita D. Freeman, REA II April 10, 2001 Page 2 Subsurface Investigation Report by ENSR, dated March 5, 2001, was hand delivered during the meeting. EB-14 had detected Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the diesel range (TPH-d) and motor oil range (TPH-mo) of 120 and 280 micrograms per liter (parts per billion), respectively, in the groundwater. No soil sample analysis above the water table was reported for EB-14. No specific depth to groundwater was reported for EB-14. ~ Groundwater depth is only generally reported as encountered between 24 to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs) over the entire site. No groundwater gradient or direction information is reported by ENSR for this project site. At that meeting, I suggested that further groundwater sampling should be performed as part of the overall removal action confirmation sampling activities. I noted that four domestic water wells and three groundwater monitoring wells already exist on site which could be used for this purpose. Summary of Work Plan Work tasks to be performed at the site include: · Removal of a 2.1 million gallon capacity crude oil aboveground storage tank (AST) and its contents (approximately 1 million gallons of oil/water/sludge determined non-hazardous by Department of Toxic Control in their letter of March 30, 1998), · Removal and proper disposal of all areas of impacted soils, · Removal and disposal of four underground storage tanks (USTs) consisting of two 8,000 gallon gasoline USTs, one 10,000 gallon gasoline UST, one 10,000 gallon diesel UST, and One 1,000 gallon waste oil UST, · Destruction of clarifier and destruction of a Class V shallow disposal well, · Removal and disposal of three septic tank systems, two sumps and floordrains, and associated hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, · Destruction of four domestic water supply wells and three groundwater monitoring wells, and Abatement of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead- based paints. A separate issue concerning the abandonment requirements of three oil wells on site and one oil well on ,~n adjacent property is being severally addressed through this Office as well as under the authority of the Lita D. Freeman, REA II April 10, 200 l Page 3 California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, and the Bakersfield City planning Department. Summary of Significant Findings · Detectible petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the groundwater west of the former Maaco building (sample EB-14) with concentrations of 120 micrograms per liter (ug/1) TPH-d and 280 ug/1 TPH-mo. Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was detected in the groundwater in concentrations of 2 ug/1 (EPA method 8260) sampled on 10/26/98 from the domestic water supply well near the former Maaco building. TPH-g was also detected at 64 ug/1. MTBE was also detected in each of the groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1, 2, & 3) located around the UST fuel facility and service garage in the northeast comer of the project area. Maximum concentration of MTBE'detected was 2 ug/l (EPA method 8620) in MW-2 sampled on 10/27/98. There is petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil in the vicinity of: The 2.1 million gallon crude oil AST (samples S-1 through S-5), and at various locations (samples ES-7, 8, &10, B-15 & 16) north and south of the AST with maximum concentrations detected of up to 3,200 mg/kg TPH at 1 ft. bgs, The steam cleaner sump at the former Glen Rose Engine Shop (sample EB-6) with concentrations of 622 mg/kg TPH-mo at 0.5 ft. bgs, The service garage in the northeast comer of the project area (sample EB-1) with concentrations of 2,600 mg/kg TPH-d at 1 ft. bgs. The fuel dispenser island to the west of the service garage (sample B-10) with concentrations of 980 mg/kg TPH-d at 1 ft. bgs Lita D. Freeman, REA II April 10, 2001 Page 4 Comments: There is evidence that petroleum hydrocarbons and associated constituents of concern (MTBE) have been detected in the groundwater in concentrations below maximum concentration limits (MCLs) at three different locations at this site. While the concentrations previously detected were below their relative health risk thresholds (i.e., MCLs), their prior detection warrants further current study as part of this Remedial Action Workplan. Further soil and groundwater sampling should occur to confirm the completion of remedial actions associated with the site. Depending on what is found during the removal actions, the soil and/or groundwater investigation may become expanded as conditions dictate. The remainder of the February 28, 2001 Remedial Action Workplan is acceptable. Please insure that a (40 CFR112) Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan is in effect prior to AST contents removal. Therefore, prior to commencement of work, please submit for approval, an addendum to the workplan which addresses confirmation groundwater sampling. The groundwater addendum shall provide for adequate characterization of applicable groundwater parameters (e.g. depth to groundwater, gradient, direction of flow, current concentrations of any previously detected contaminants of concern, distance to nearest municipal water supply wells, etc.) The groundwater addendum may either allow for the sampling of existing domestic supply and groundwater monitoring wells on site (prior to destruction), a program of additional post-remedial ' action groundwater monitoring, or both. Please be advised that this Office will not grant "case closure" until confirmation sampling of both soil and groundwater demonstrate that the remedial actions are complete and that no significant threat to health, safety or the environment exists at the site. Sincerely, RALPH E. HUEY, Director By: Howard H. Wines, Ill Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services cc: T. Bartok, Costco B A'K E R S F I E L D FIRE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 Business Phone {661) 326-3979 · FAX (661) 326-0576 FAX Transmittal TO: ~-'f 1~'~ COMPANY: ~__.--,'~./'~ P... FROM: FAXNo..~-'-/0 .. COMMENTS: 'g/ (~e- ced FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 _ VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 APril 10, 2001 Lita D. Freeman, REA II ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Su Alameda, CA 94502 RE: Removal Action Workplan, Proposed Costco Site located at 2800 Standard Street and 3650 through 3880 Rosedale Highway Bakersfield, California Dear Ms. Freeman, This Office has reviewed the above referenced workplan, dated February 28, 2001 submitted by ENSR on behalf of Mr. Todd Bartok, Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco). In addition, this Office has previously reviewed an earlier removal action workplan, dated January 23, 2001, and a subsequent Site History and Subsurface Investigation Report, dated March 5, 2001, also prepared and submitted by ENSR. Background Information On or about January 23, 2001, ENSR notified this Office that a removal action workplan was forthcoming for removal actions on site. On February 6, 2001, ENSR conducted two additional borings (EB-13 & 14) which were advanced to groundwater for collection of soil and groundwater samples in the vicinity west of the former Maaco building where the proposed Costco fuel facility was being planned at that time. On or about February 28, 2001, a second Removal Action Workplan was submitted by ENSR on behalf of Costco. This February 28, 2001 revision of the January 23,2001 workplan incorporated the necessary corrections this Office had referenced in our February 7, 2001 letter. Borings EB-13 & 14 were not addressed in the February 28, 2001 workplan. On March 9, 2001, a meeting with ENSR in our office was held to review the findings associated with EB-14. A supplemental Site History and Lita D. Freeman, REA II April 10, 200 l Page 2 Subsurface Investigation Report by ENSR, dated March 5, 2001, was hand delivered during the meeting. EB-14 had detected Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the diesel range (TPH-d) and motor oil range (TPH-mo) of 120 and 280 micrograms per liter (parts per billion), respectively, in the groundwater. No soil sample analysis above the water table was reported for EB-14. No specific depth to groundwater was reported for EB-14.., Groundwater depth is only generally reported as encountered between 24 to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs) over the entire site. No groundwater gradient or direction information is reported by ENSR for this project site. At that meeting, I suggested that further groundwater sampling should be performed as part of the overall removal actiOn confirmation sampling activities. I noted that four domestic water wells and three groundwater monitoring wells already exist on site which could be used for this purpose. Summary of Work Plan Work tasks to be performed at the site include: · Removal of a 2.1 million gallon capacity crude oil aboveground storage tank (AST) and its contents (approximately 1 million gallons of oil/water/sludge determined non-hazardous by Department of Toxic Control in their letter Of March 30, 1998), Removal and proper disposal of all areas of impacted soils, Removal and disposal of four underground storage tanks (USTs) consisting of two 8,000 gallon gasoline USTs, one 10,000 gallon gasoline UST, one 10,000 gallon diesel UST, and one 1,000 gallon -- h~.. waste oil UST, · Destruction of clarifier on Class V s well, "'~'-----~-.~og- . · Removal and disposal of'three septic tank systems, two sumps and floordrains, and associated hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, · ' Destruction of four domestic water supply wells and three groundwater monitoring wells, and · Abatement of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead- based paints. A separate issue concerning the abandonment requirements of three oil wells on site and one oil well on an adjacent property is being severally addressed through this Office as well as under the authority of the Lita D..Freeman, REA II April 10, 2001 Page 3 Califomia Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, and the Bakersfield City Planning Department. Summary of Significant Findings · Detectible petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the groundwater west of the former Maaco building (sample EB-14) with concentrations of 120 micrograms per liter (ug/1) TPH-d and 280 ug/1 TPH-mo. Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was detected in the groundwater in concentrations of 2 ug/1 (EPA method 8260) sampled on 10/26/98 from../f~domextic water supply ~ former Maaco building. (~-~04-- Ac> l~,4-- 64o~/t--- "V0_~ MTBE was also detected in each of the groundwater monitoring wells (MW-i, 2, & 3) located around the UST fuel facility and service garage in the northeast comer of the project area. Maximum concentration of MTBE detected was 2 ug/1 (EPA method 8620) in MW-2 sampled on 10/27/98. There is petroleum hydrocarbon'impacted soil in the vicinity of: The 2.1 million gallon crude oil AST (samples S-1 through S-5), and at various locations (samples ES-7, 8, & 10, B- 15 & 16) north and south of the AST with maximum concentrations detected of up to 3,200 mg/kg TPH at I ft. bgs, The steam cleaner sump at the former Glen Rose Engine Shop (sample EB-6) with concentrations of 622 mg/kg TPH-mo at 0.5 ft. bgs, The service garage in the northeast comer of the project area (sample EB-1) with concentrations of 2,600 mg/kg TPH-d at 1 ft. bgs. The fuel dispenser island to the west of the service garage (sample B-10) with concentrations of 980 mg/kg TPH-d at 1 ft. bgs Lita D. Freeman, REA II April 10, 2001 Page 4 Comments: There is evidence that petroleum hydrocarbons and associated constituents of concern (MTBE) have been detected in the groundwater in concentrations below maximum concentration limits (MCLs) at three different locations at this site. While the concentrations previously detected were below their relative health risk thresholds (i.e., MCLs); their prior detection warrants further current study as part of this Remedial Action Workplan. Further soil and groundwater sampling should occur to The remain~[,¢dial Action ~ Therefore, prior to eommen'n ement of work, please submit for approvalS, an addendum to the workplan which addresses confirmation groundwater sampling. The groundwater addendum shall provide for adequate characterization of applicable groundwater parameters (e.g. depth to groundwater, gradient, direction of flow, current concentrations of any previously detected contaminants of concern, distance to nearest municipal water supply wells, etc.) The groundwater addendum may either allow for the sampling of existing domestic supply and groundwater monitoring wells on site (prior to destruction), a program of additional post-remedial action groundwater monitoring, or both. Please be advised that this Office will not grant "case closure" until confirmation sampling of both soil and groundwater demonstrate that the remedial actions are complete and that no significant threat to health, safety or the environment exists at the site. Sincerely,. RALPH E. HUEY, Director By: Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services cc: T. Bartok, Costco 04/11/01 08:17 8661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 9523 15107486799 04/11 08:15 02'24 5 OK ~PR-0~-~001 15~50 P~0~/04 April 2, 2001 ENSR Project No.: 8727-049 ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway Suite 120 Alameda, CA 94502-7098 {510) 748-6700 www, ensr, com Mr. Howard Wines Bakersfield Fire Department, Environmental Services t715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield. California 93301 SUBJECT: Costco Wholesale Corporation Proposed Development Rosedale Highway Site Bakersfield, California - Dear Mr. Wines: As you know, ENSR Corporation (ENSR) has been retained by Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco) as their environmental consultant for the above referenced site. Four water supply wells and three groundwater monitoring wells are located on this site, as listed below. Well Identification Purpose Location North Well (N Well) Supply South Well Supply Maaco Well (M Well) Supply Glen Rose Well Supply MW-1 Monitoring MW~2 Monitoring MW-3 Monitoring North border of Sparks parcel South border of Sparks parcel Maaco/Rosedale Hotel parcel Glen Rose parcel Sparks parcel Sparks parcel Sparks parcel Proposed remediation work at the site includes removal of a crude oil aboveground storage tank (AST) and its contents, removal and disposal of underground storage tanks and. associated dispensers and piping, destruction of a Class V shallow disposal well, and removal and disposal of septic tank systems, sumps and floor drains. Extensive subsurface investigations performed at the site in the past have indicated that the constituents of concern in the soils are limited to petroleum hydrocarbons. The investigations have included collection and analyses of water samples from the existing supply and monitoring wells and from 14 borings advanced across the site. We request that post remediation-groundwater sampling of the above noted supply and monitoring wells not be required by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department for the following reasons: 1. Analyses of water samples collected from the wells by Soils Engineering. Inc. (SEI) did not reveal the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations above "action levels". Water samples were collected from the North Well, Maaco Well, MW-l, MW-2 and MW-3 in 8727-049 {~ Over 30 Yea[s of Excellence in Environmental Services ines o October 1998 by SEI. Analyses of these samples did not reveal the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits with the exception of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) detected at a concentration of 64 micrograms per liter (pg/L), methyl tertiary butyl ether (MtBE) at concentrations up to 2 pg/L, xylenes at concentrations up to 3.8 IJg/L and toluene at concentrations up to 0.91 pg/L. Analysis of groundwater samples collected by ENSR from borings located across the site in 2000/2001 did not reveal the presence of the chemical constituents noted above (TPH-g, MtBE, xylenes and toluene) at concentrations at or above the laboratory reporting limits. Groundwater was ~ncountered at approximately the same depths during the previous and recent subsurface investigations. In 1998, SEI measured depth to groundwater in the water supply and monitoring wells on the north end of the site (N Well, MW-l, MW-2 and MW-3) at approximately 20 feet. This approximately corresponds to groundwater depths of 23 to 25 feet as measured in borings advanced by ENSR in 2000. Depth to groundwater in the water supply wells on the south end of the site ranged from approximately 61 to 64 feet in 1998, according to information reported by SEI. ENSR measured depth to groundwater at 28 to 42 feet in borings advanced on the southern end of the site in 2000. The proposed remedial activities include removal of potential sources/migration pathways for petroleum hydrocarbons to enter the subsurface. ENSR's representative Will be on-site throughout the proposed remedial activities and will note evidence, if any, of petroleum hydrocarbon impact to the subsurface. Petroleum hydrocarbon impacts, if any, noted during remediation would likely be limited to near-surface soils, in ENSR's opinion, due to the extensive groundwater sampling program performed to date and the depth to groundwater of approximately 25 to 35 feet below ground surface as measured in borings advanced on the site in 2000/2001. Postponing destruction of the wells until completion of the remedial activities, including removal of the crude oil AST, would result in significant delays to the remediation schedule and increases in costs as contractors would be required to remobilize to the site to destroy the wells. Due to the extensive remediation required at the site, we anticipate that the remedial work will require approximately 8 weeks to complete and that various tasks associated with removal of the crude oil AST contents and destruction of the AST itself will be performed during each of these weeks. The location of the crude oil AST will allow completion of other remedial activities, including destruction of the water supply and monitoring wells, concurrently with removal of the crude oil AST. Performing the remedial activities concurrently will result in time and cost savings as only one mobilization to the site would be needed by the contractor. The water supply and monitoring wells will be properly destroyed during remediation and potable water for the proposed development will be obtained from public utilities. 872%049 ~ Over 30 Y;ars of Excellence in Environmental Services ines So that 'Costco can proceed with its effort to purchase, remediate and develop the site as expeditiously as possible, would you please confirm in writing by signing this letter in the space provided below, that sampling of the water supply and monitoring wells will not be required by the City of Bakersfield Fire Department for the above noted reasons. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Please call Lita Freeman at (510) 748-6700 or directly at (510) 748-6483 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ENSR Corporation Senior Project Manager City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Environmental Services Name: Signature: Date: 8727-049 Over 30 Years Of Excellence in Environmental Services DZVZSZON OF OZL, GAS, & GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES 4800 STOCKDALE HWY SUZTE 417 BAKERSFIELD CAL[FORNZA 93309-2694 PHONE 661/322-4031 FAX 661/861-0279 INTERNET consrv.ca.gov GRAY DAVIS GOVERNOR RTMENT O STATE OF F CO ERVAT! CALIFORNIA ON March 27, 2001 Mr. Jim Eggert Bakersfield City Planning Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Eggert: Subject: Site Plan Review No. P0020900 (Costco Warehouse) The Department of Conservation's (Department) Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal ResoUrCes (Division) has reviewed the above referenced project. The Division supervises the drilling, maintenance, and plugging and abandonment of oil, gas, and geothermal wells in California. We offer the following comments for yoUr consideration. The Division first became aware of this project in February of 2001 as a result of inquiries from the Bakersfield Fire Department and an environmental consulting firm working for the project applicant. We were not contacted to review and comment on the CEQA documents for the previous annexation of this property or the site plan review. We would prefer to be notified of future projects of this type, so that mitigation measures can be designed to address our concerns. The Division believes it has the role of Responsible Agency under CEQA regarding development projects on this property. Section 21069 of the Public Resources Code states a" 'Responsible agency' means a public agency, other than the lead agency, which has responsibility for carrying out or approving a project." Section 21065 (c) of the Public Resources Code defines a project as "An activity that involves the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or Other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies." The Division issues permits required for well drilling, rework and abandonment operations as required by sections 3203 and 3229 of the Public Resources Code. Further, Title 14, Division 2 of the .Califomia Code of Regulations, section 1683.2 states' that "No regulatory permitting actions of the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources are ministerial." Specific to this project, section 3208.1 of the Public Resources authorizes the State Oil and Gas Supervisor to order the reabandonment of a previously plugged and abandoned well when construction over or in proximity to the well could result in a hazard. If the work required by that order is not performed, section 3226 of the pUblic ResoUrces Code authorizes the Supervisor to appoint agents to enter the property to perform the work, and recover the amount expended by the attachment of liens against real or personal property. Mr. Jim Eggert March 27, 2001 Page 2 The proposed project lies within the administrative boundaries of the Fruitvale oilfield. The statement X. a. of the Negative Declaration is incorrect. Please reference Enclosure A, a portion of DOGGR Map No. 435 (and figure V-3 Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan, Conservation Element). Of the wells recorded on this site, all three are plugged and abandoned. There is also one plugged and abandoned well in close proximity to the subject property. The specific well locations are as follows: Operator Lease/Well Location Phillips Petroleum Co. "Bitner" 1 725' N & 1835' W from S/4 cor of SE cor Phillips Petroleum Co. "Bitner" 2 675' N & 1435' W from S/4 cor of SE cor Trico Industries, Inc. no. 1 817' N & 1030' W from S/4 cor of SE cor J. C. Maddy no. 1 900' N & 500' E from S/4 cor ofSW cor We disagree with statement VII. c. of the Negative Declaration. These four wells are not abandoned in accordance with current Division standards. If further development is planned for the site that will result in the construction of a structure within fifty feet of a well, this office must be cOntacted to investigate the condition of the wellhead and check for leakage. Reabandonment operations will be required. The Division recommends that no structure be located over or in proximity of a previously plugged and abandoned well. If this cannot'be avoided, please be aware that the State Oil and Gas Supervisor is authorized to order the reabandonment of a previously plugged and abandoned well when construction of any structure over or in the proximity of the well could result in a hazard (Section 3208.1 of the Public Resources Code). Ifreabandonment is required, the cost of operations is the responsibility of the owner of the property upon which the structure will be located. If a well requiring reabandonment is on an adjacent property and near the common property line, the Division recommends that the structure be set back sufficiently to allow future access to the well. Prior to commencing operations, the project applicant must provide the Division's Bakersfield office with specific development plans indicating development location relative to the well locations. The maps of these plans, and all future maps related to the project, should accurately plot the location of wells. With these plans and maps, the Division can then assess the well work that may be required. Mr. Jim Eggert March 27, 2001 Page 3 Nevertheless, if any abandoned or unrecorded wells are uncovered or damaged during excavation or grading, remedial plugging operation may be required. This office must be contacted to obtain information on the requirements for and approval to perform remedial operation. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions, please cal'l Joseph A. Austin at the Bakersfield district office: 4800 Stockdale Highway, Suite 417, Bakersfield, CA 93309; phone (661) 322-4031. Sincerely, David Mitchell Senior Oil and Gas Engineer Cci Mr. Jeff Wilson, Mulvanny Architects Ms. Lita Freeman, ENSR 'KCL G" ,0 ( ~CL-G ) Chevrorl ( KCL - G) O~O3 Z'A (Fo/;'4awn .A ) ' 3 +~ ( Oa.ra ~*/'~) 37 /Bowman) II [Frui/val~ '26 ~, 20 I ~%Od~Oer. Corp. .~,___~ .. + ~...~", 2~ '~eAur~l~ C~evran ~SA, inc. Crexa~ co reed· t ~. C. 0il CO. 44 -,~275 4950 "'/ "" 57- $355 ~'~,, s, · / 19 TH. D March 27, 2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Lita Freeman ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120 Alameda, Ca 94502 Dear Ms. Freeman: Per our discussion, the following are the requirements for the proposed Costco site with regards to three previously abandoned oil wells on the property. Municipal Code section 15.66.080 Development encroachment in petroleum areas. On-Site Petroleum Facilities. Where a developer proposes to subdivide, rezone or otherwise develop property which contains existing drilling and/or production operations including disposal wells, the developer shall provide a plan showing how all existing petroleum related facilities will be protected and integrated into the proposed development so as said facilities will satisfy the development standards pursuant to this chapter. The developer shall also submit a plan of the ultimate use of the land after cessation ~fpetroleum operations and abandonment of the wells. Any buildable lot containing an area which may not be built upon because of development standard compliance of the petroleum facilities shall be encumbered by the developer with a deed restriction specifying the area so encumbered and identifying the name and location of the well causing the encumbrance. If a final map is required, said encumbrance shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. Abandoned Wells. Tentative maps, planned development and other devek,?ment plans submitted to the city shall show the location of all wells drilled on the property. Prior to development of an area, any well shown as abandoned shall be accompanied by ~'ritten verification from the D.O.G. that the well was properly abandoned pursuant to their regulations. Any well thereafter abandoned shall also be accompanied by written verification from the D.O.G. Development shall be designed such that the city building official is satisfied that no structure will be built within ten feet of any well that has been properly abandoned pursuant to D.O.G. requirements. Any lot or parcel containing an abandoned well shall be encumbered with a deed restriction specifying the exact location of such well and prohibiting any construction within said ten feet area. If a final map is required, the encumbrance shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. The D.O.G., at their discretion, may also require that any abandoned well be uncovered, tested for leakage, require remedial work on leaking wells, and accurately located on the final map before said map is recorded. If your area is to be developed in such a way that a contiguous hard surface (asphalt or concrete) exists between the abandoned oil well and the building, we request that the well be properly vented or a ten(lO) feet soil buffer be installed between the well and the building. This landscape buffer may be located around the building, over the abandoned well or a place between the well and the building. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (66'1) 326- 3979. Sincerely, Office of Environmental Services REH/dm cc: Joseph Austin, D.O.G. LIST OF AGENCIES FOR OIL WELL ABANDONMENT State of Texas Railroad Commission Contact: Mark England, Oil well Abandonment Director Confirms that they do not recommend building on abandoned oil wells, but local agencies do allow it. Railroads in Texas do not regulate oil wells once they have been abandoned. Builders or owners go through local agencies. Problems: Mr. England states, that he has heard of only a few problems in the many years as director of oil well abandonments: 1) During a house remodel, owner dug through floor and foundation and found a 6' x 120' hole. 2) Report of vapor smell coming up around home. Department of Oil & Gas, Cypress California, District #1 Contact: Mark Gamache Confirms that in Los Angeles County, Orange County and Riverside area they have approximately 251 abandoned oil wells that have had structures built on them. Problems: States that there have been three. 1) involved explosion of methane at a Ross Dress for Less store. 2) a home owner in Huntington Beach caused a small explosion due to a backhoe operation. 3) a homeowner crushed a vent line and methane was seeping up in yard. Those are the only problems associated with buildings over abandoned wells. Department of Oil & Gas, Bakersfield California, District #4 Contact: Joe Austin, Engineer, CEQA Confirms there are three abandoned oil wells in his district. Problems: None that he is aware of. Department of Oil & Gas, Santa Maria California, District #3 Contact: Mike Ross, Engineer He is not aware of any abandoned oil wells that have been built over. Local jurisdiction does not allow it. Department of Conservation Baton Rouge, Louisiana Contact: John Aldridge, Director of Well Abandonment · Confirms that they have no further responsibility after well has been abandoned. He is aware of instances where wells have been built over. Problems: Several homes and commercial buildings have been tom down due to methane leaks. He is not aware of any mandate for a engineered "vent collection system." CONSTRUCTION ABOVE AN ABANDONED OIL WELL California Oil wells are regulated in Califomia by the Department of Oil and Gas (D.O.G.). Oil production is prevalent in SoUthern California, Southern San Joaquin Valley and the Central Coast area. The Department of Oil and Gas do not recommend construction over an abandoned well, however they do not regulate it, they allow local jurisdiction to approve. If a structure is built over an abandoned well DOG does insist on a methane gas collection system. We have contacted the district D.O.G. offices for these areas with the following results: District 1 (Southern California) Contact: Mark Gamache (D.O.G.) Los Angeles County, Orange County and Riverside do permit construction above abandoned oil wells, although, it is not recommended by D.O.G. The final approval is granted by a local (City or County) agency. These counties have permitted approximately 251 sites to be constructed above an abandoned well. There are three recorded incidents related to these 251 sites: Ross Dress for Less in Los Angeles. Methane explosion and fire resulting in total loss of the building. A home in Huntington Beach. Homeowner using a backhoe caused a small explosion outside of the home. Minimal damage. o A home in Cypress. Homeowner crushed the vent line coming from the Methane collection site. Methane gas then leaked into the soil and was detected by a field detection monitor. No consequence. District 2 (Ventura County) Contact: Anne Anderle To date, no structures have been built over an existing well. Anne did feel this might be challenged soon with all of the development going on in the area. The D.O.G. office strongly discourages any building over an abandoned well. District 3 (Central California Coastal Area - Santa Barbara to Santa Clara) Contact: Mike Ross No construction has been permitted over an abandoned well. District 4 (Southern San Joaquin Valley including Kern County) Contact: Joe Austin Construction has been permitted over three abandoned well sites in Kern County. The.third and most recent was completed yesterday, February 14, 2001. To date, no problems have been recorded from these three sites. Texas Oil wells are regulated in Texas by the State Railroad Commission. Contact Mark England, Oil Well Abandonment Director. Confirms that they do not recommend building on abandoned oil wells, but local agencies do allow it. Railroads in Texas do not regulate oil wells once they have been abandoned. Builders or owners go through local agencies. They do not insist on any gas collection systems Problems: Mr. England states, that he has heard of only a few problems in the many years as DirectOr of Oil Well Abandonments: 1) During a house remodel, owner dug through floor and foundation and found a 6' x 120' hole. 2) Reports of vapor smell coming up around home. Louisiana Oil wells in Louisiana are regulated by the State Department of Conservation. Contact: John Aldridge, Director of Well Abandonment. Confirms that they have no further responsibility after well has been abandoned. He is aware of instances where wells have been built over. Problems: Several homes and commercial buildings have been tom down due to Methane leaks. He is not aware of any mandate for a engineered "vent collection system." e e o o Environmental Benefits Associated With Costco Site Remediation Removal of Aboveground Storage Tank Containing 1 Million Gallons of Oily Waste For over the past ten years, the contents of this tank have been the subject of an ongoing hazardous waste investigation conducted by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC). The investigation was based on a presumption that the oil, water, and sediment within the tank was "hazardous" either through the characteristic of toxicity or else based on an unsubstantiated rumor that the tank had, in 1985, received a "listed" hazardous waste shipment. On March 30, 1998, DTSC finally concluded their investigation with a determination that the oily waste in the tank was actually "non- hazardous" and could be removed and recycled. Unfortunately, the current property owners (Darrell and Mary Sparks) filed for bankruptcy in 1992 and are unable to pay the costs to remove the wastes. Removal and Disposal of Impacted Soils Surface soils with petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in excess of 1000 parts per million (mg/kg) are present in four areas on site. There is a total of about 250 tons of this soil which will be removed and disposed of as non-hazardous waste. Removal and Disposal of Five Illegally Abandoned Underground Storage Tanks There are a total of five illegally abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) on the property, consisting of two 10,000 gallon and one 8,000 gallon diesel tanks, one 8,000 gallon lube oil tank, and one 1,000 gallon waste oil tank. The tanks were installed in 1980 and operated until approximately 1987. The USTs have been in violation of state and federal law throughout these 14 years of abandonment. Again, the Sparks bankruptcy situation has effectively prevented the proper removal of the USTs. Removal of IHegal Underground Injection Well and Associated Impacted Soils A truck wash rack drains into a three-stage clarifier and the waste water is injected into the soil in violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act. The injection well is approximately 15 feet deep. Approximately 15 tons of liquid and sludge are estimated to be present in the clairifier and injection well. There is also anticipated to be approximately 75 tons of hydrocarbon impacted soil in the vicinity of the well. Sampling has indicated that the concrete clairifier, liquid, sludge, and soil can be removed and disposed of as non- hazardous waste. Removal and Disposal of Septic Systems There are three septic systems (septic tanks and leach field) which will-be removed from the Sparks, Maaco, and Glen Rose properties. An estimated 200 tons of waste material (including sludge in tank, tank, drain lines, and impacted soil) will be produced for each septic system. This includes approximately 100 tons of non-hazardous septic contaminated soil, and 100 tons of concrete and piping materials. e Removal and Disposal of Sumps A steam cleaner sump is located on the Glen Rose parcel. In addition, three other sumps are on the Sparks property. It is anticipated that 100 tons of concrete and 100 tons of petroleum impacted soil will be removed and disposed of as non-hazardous waste. Removal and Disposal of Floor Drains There are two floor drains containing sludge inside the former Maaco Auto Paint shop. There is an estimated one ton of sludge to be disposed of as hazardous waste and an estimated 20 tons of soil and concrete to be removed for disposal or recycling. ge Destruction of On-Site Private Domestic Water Supply Wells There are four private shallow water supply wells on the site. These wells range in depth from 60 to 280 feet. These wells are not suitable for public drinking water supplies and will be destroyed by removing the well casings and filling with neat cement grout. e Destruction of Three Shallow Groundwater Monitoring Wells Three shallow ground water monitoring wells are located on the Sparks property in the vicinity of the USTs. The wells are 35 feet in depth with eight inch diameter boreholes. The well casings will be removed by overdrilling to the total well depth. The borings will then be backfilled with neat cement grout. 10. Abatement of Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Materials An asbestos survey was completed in 1998 on the asbestos containing materials (ACMs) present in thc on-site buildings. The former service garage on the Sparks proerty has 360 square feet of flooring and floor tiles with ACMs. The former Maaco Auto Paint shop. has 655 liner feet of window putty and cement pipe with ACMs. The Glen Rose Engine Shop has approximately 300 square feet of floor tile and drywall joint compound with ACMs. A lead-based paint survey will also be conducted as part of the demolition process. Demolition of structures with ACMs will be conducted under additional permitting with the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District in accordance with all federal, state, and local requirements which govern asbestos abatement work. S:~FEB 01\Costco Benefits.wpd February 28, 2001 File No.: 8727-049 ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway Suite 120 Alameda, CA 94502-7098 (510) 748-6700 www.ensr, com Mr. Todd Bartok Costco Wholesale 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, Washington 98027 Subject: Removal Action Workplan Rosedale Highway Property Bakersfield, California Dear Mr. Bartok: ENSR Corporation (ENSR) prepared this Removal Action Workplan (RAW) for the referenced site located at 2800 Standard Street and 3650 through 3880 Rosedale Highway in Bakersfield, California. This submittal includes site background information, proposed cleanup objectives and goals, remedial activities for impacted soils, procedures for removal of a crude oil aboveground storage tank (AST) and its contents, procedures for removal and disposal of underground storage, tanks and associated dispensers and piping, procedures for destruction of a Class V shallow disposal well, procedures for removal and disposal of septic tank systems, sumps and floor drains, procedures for destruction of water supply wells and groundwater monitoring wells, reabandonment of oil production wells, abatement of asbestos containing materials and a schedule for implementation of the RAW. We trust that this submittal will meet your requirements and upon your approval this. document will be submitted to the appropriate regulatory agency for their review and approval. Should you require any additional information and/or clarification, please call Lita Freeman at (510) 748-6483. Sincerely, ENSR Corporation -Lita D. Freeman, R.E.A. II Senior Project Manager Jackie House, R.G., C.E.G., C.H.G. Senior Program Manager Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services D March 5,2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Sparks Estate c/o Retail Investors, Inc. 4450 California Ave, Suite K-303 Bakersfield, Ca 93309 Recent Annexation to City Limits: Abandoned Used Oill Abandoned Storage Tank and Class V Shallow Disposal Well at 2800 Standard Street Dear Mr. Sparks: It has come to our attention that you currently own property located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield which contains the above referenced items which are subject to California's Used Oil Management law and the federal Underground Injection Control regulations of the Safe Drinking Water Act, respectively. Records obtained by this Office from the County of Kern indicate'that the used oil has been tested and is tzonsidered a "non-hazardous"waste pursuant to a March 30, 1998 letter issued by California Environmental Protection Agency (Cai/EPA) Department of Toxic Substance Control. The used oil is, however, subject to Hazardous Materials Inventory reporting for emergency response preparedness purposes as well as local permitting requirements for storage. Application forms are enclosed. The Class IV Shallow Disposal Well is in violation of federal regulations and must be properly abandoned. Please make the necessary arrangements to properly close the disposal well within 30 days of this notice. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosure INVEN RY OF INJECTIOI ELLS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Undero)und Injection Control ProtFn ~EE:lNSTRjCTioNSo~'Ft~E!3ilThiS:ih~r~atio!)i~;iCOlle~i~d u~dCr the auil3cef;the SafD~nkingVVater ACt, Per the : 0n~r~0~d. !nj~i.o~ ~t~!~;;~eg~!~:ti~t:40~:26 and: rei~ted: at !~;83This ~rm iS intende~ use ~ :: inje~tiO~:~;~eii~ ~ ~'~:'~tbrS ih: E~.:Regibd 9 state~ (Cal~ni~:; A~na~,.:H~ii, N~da)~ ;~cific, Isiands~and ;;:;t6 ~e~:;~er than20,¢b¢~6~ Per ¢~!ngle~milY ~!lings):are n6t Subjebt:;t~.tb~':.rbquiremen~E~ Region 9 ;:;:'Sb'~ ~bt:seek~nto~ i~ti0h; rega~ding~nSUsed S01elyt° protect residen~etalCUndations from precipi~ 2. FAClLI~ ID NO (le~ blank if~u do not h~a RC~ ID 3' DATE PREFARED(yr/mo/da/) · TRANS,~CTIONTYPE (please mak'one) __Deletion __FirstTime Entf __ Change (e: ownership type of veil) __ Pre-closure Notification 4. FACILITY INFORM;~ION A. Facility Name B. Street Address (do not use~. Box) *Latitude/Longitude Iofmation can be obained at no chargF {~3ing to thedlloNing vebsite: wwwepa.godowm/ sw/industF/inde(.htm, and selecting Latitude/LongitUde Finders under the Resources SecUre.codes can be obtained ~ searchinghttp:llwwwosha.go//oshstatslsicsehtml. C.*Latitude (deg/min/sec) D. Longitude (deg/min/sec) E. SiC Code(s) F. CityFOwn (3. State H. Zip Code I. County J. OnTribal Land? Yes or No 5. LEGAL CON'ACT A.Type (Che(k all that apply):__ Owner Opetor B. Contact Name C. Contact Organization Name D. Contact Mailing Address E. City/State/ZiP Fl. ContactTelephone 'F2. Contact lAX F3. ContactE-mail G. Ownership](cheok one) __ P~ivate __PulJc H. Please list a!~ local, state or other pmits on file with a regulatoy agency(~r hazardous matdals or hazardous waste management, or aste discharge¢srelevant to the use of ~our injection ~ell(s). I FOR EFA USE ONLY I Rec/~ Date: Entrd Dbase: I Follo~v Up? Y or N Staff: CONTINUED NEXT A~iE. 6. WELL INFORM/lION C. Well Operation Status A. sub-Class B. # wells UC AC PC TA FA I 6D. Comments(attach additional sheets as needed) 7. Certification Statement I cetify under penalty of~ahat I ha~ read and understand the eligibilit~ requirements of "authi~ation b), rule" Dr opeation of injection eJls. I certify under penalty of,tathat there are no discharges of hazardous substances or other fluids in amounts which ma y endanger an underg'ound source of i~king rater from the injectiorelt(s) identified on this inentory form, per 40 CFR Brt 144.12 and 144.82. Additionallyl certify under penalty of lay that this document and all attachments were prepared under m y direction or super vision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personn~ propely gathered and ealuated the irCrmation submittedBased on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or thos, persons directly responl~l:br gathemg the im3Tnati0n, the iofmation is to the best of Trkncwledge and belieftte, accurate and completel am aware that there are significant penalties f or submitting false information, including the possibility of fine andcalqment(fr kneving violations I Name(printed or typed): lTitle: Signature: ONCEYOU HA/E COMPLETEDrHE FORM, SIGN (#7), MAKE COPY FORYOUR ONN FILES AND MAIDRIGINAL(S)TO: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GroundWater Office (WTR-9) UIC flento~, 75 HaNtho~e Street San Francisco CA 94105-3109 Questions about this)fm? Please call (415) 744-225(For general questions about Sa~DrinkingWater Act progams at EI~, including the Underground Injection Control Prog ram, see www.epa.gov/ saltwater, or call the Saf~.DrinkingWater Act Hotline at (800) 426- 4791, EST Table 6: Terms UC: under constaction AC: active well PC: Preclosure notice TA: abandoned without notification/ appro/al by regulator PA: permanently abandoned (closed) with notification/appral by regulator(please Fist name of agency and date of appr, al in comment be() 6A. Sub-Classes of Shallow Injection Wells 5A5 geotha~al reinjectate 5A6 geothenal heat source 5A7 heat pumC3~retun flow 5A8 geothmal aquaculture 5A19 cooling water re~(~specify contact or non-contact) 5B22 Saline B~/Intusion Barrier 5D2 Stonwater dainage (precipitation, exterior rash only) ~ 5D4 Stor~vatercombined with inddatr · or commercia process flu ds ,5F1 A¢cultualdainage 5G30 Specialdrainage (define) 5R21 Aqu~f Recharged~nking ~.ter .stor~e 5S23 Subsidence control 5W10 Cesspool 5Wll Septic System 5W12 V~ste~aterTreatment Plant Effluent 5W20 Combined .age and indu~M or commercial process fluids discharging tc cesspool or septic system 5W32 Community leachfiellJ~oons or other effluent dispersal methods 5X13 Mining BklillVVell 5X14 Solution Minil~j~ll 5X15 In-situ(Fssil Fuel Reo~ry 5X16 Brae Retan Flor 5X17 Air SobberWaste 5X18Water Softener regera~ion 5X25 Experiment'~chnology 5X26 Aqu~f Remediation 5X27 Other (define) 5X28 MotoMghicleWaste disposal t Roward W~nes - ~nventory.pdf A A Page ..3.~ INVEN'DRY OF INJECTIONNELLS-InstrJctions U.S, Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Under~)und Injection Control Pro~fn 1. WH~ ISTHIS RETIREMENT? 2. SOURC~ATER ASSESSMENT ~M:State Because more than half of the nation depends on ddnking ~ter pro, ms are in the process of delineating under~ound sour~s ofi~[ing ~te~ subsu~ce ~ste areas where ~king ~ter sources are located and/or disposal is regulated under the 8¢~nkingWater Act. recharged. More stringent regulations m~ apply to Such disposal systems are also call~jection ells~, injection ells and other potential contaminant sources from ~lti-~mily septic systems to the deepest dispos~ithin these areas wells pumping millions of gallons peCato the e~. 3. ~PE~ORK REDUCTIO~ N~ICE:The pu~c WHAT IS A SHALLOW INJECTION WELL? 144.3, reposing burden for this collection of information is r~ised 12/7/99, ~ aiwellfis a bored, ~d, or d~en estimated at about 1 hour per ~a~ including time 6r sha~ whose depth is ~eater than the largest su~ce r~i~ing instuctions searching ~isting data sources dimensionpr, a dug hole whose depth is greater than gatheing and maintaining data needed, and completing the largest sure dimensio~ an impr~ed sinkhole; and reviewing the collection of information. Send o~ a subsu~ fluid dis~ution systemAisubsu~ce comments regarding the ~den estimate or a~ other fluid dis~ution systemfs an assem~ge of pe~rated aspect of this collection of information, including pipe~ drain tiles or other similar mechanisms intendeCuggestion~ reducing th~en, to ChiefnS~ation to dis~te ~uids be~ the sure of the ~und. Septic Policy Branch, 2136, U.S. Environmental Protection systems d~ll~ cesspools seepage pitspercolation Agency 401 M Street S~ashington DC 20460, and trenches and d~infield8 are common te~s used to to the O~ce of Management and Budget, ~e~ desc~be di~rent ~pes of sha~injection con~tion. Reduction Projec~ashington DC 20503. All ~ne~/operators of injection wells are required to4. CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFOR~N EPA submit i~nto~ inflation to ~. E~ (or its delegated has pro~lgated regulations to protect the confidentiali~ state representa~ regarding the location and type oDf the bsiness i~ation it rec~ These regulations all injection wells operated. (40 CFR P ad 144.26.) are set ~h in 40 CFR pa~ 2, subpa~ B, and in the Updates are required aw time there is a significant Federal Register at 4~B. Reg.36902 (9/1/76), 4~. change in the status ofthe~, Dr ~ample when the Reg.4000 (9/8/78) and 50~. Reg.51661 (10/18/85). well is closed, or when wne~hip chang~ For more A claim of ~siness confidentiali~ ~be asse~ed in than 95% of all Clas~ ~11~ no ~deral pe~its will be the manner specified in 40 CFR Section 220~It required. Submission ¢ accurate~nto~ inS~ation or all of the inflation requested.EPA will disclose ma~s ~u iautho~ed ~ ~lefto opeate ~ur injection business inS~ation c~ered ~ such a claim only as well(s) pr~ided that thc are not used ~r the disposal authoEed under 40 CFR p~, subp~B If no claim of fluids which m~ endanger under~und sources of accompanies the bsiness inflation at the time the ddnking wat~ E~ recei~s it, E~ m~ ma~ it ~ilaDe to the pu~ without f~er noticeNo ~cili~ m~ withhold from ~ SUPPLEME~L INVEN~ INFORM~ION:~r 40 aw information on the ~ounds that it is confidential CFR B~ 144.27, ~ m~ require~ne~ and op~o~ business inS~ation. of inje~ion ~lls to submit supplemental i~mation pe~aining to the ope~tion of their injection well(s) if Additional i~ation regarding these requirements ~n requested ~ E~. Such inS~ation m~ include ~11 be obtained at ~ .epa.goCsaf ewater (see const~ction, hist~of usedepth to seasonal higher iUnder¢ound Injection Control, Clas~f) or ~ calling ta~e, pr~imi~ to dnking ~ter ~lls and sure ~ter the S~ D~kin~ter Act Hotlie~800) 4264791, EST bodie~ pr~imi~ to other inje~ion we~l~nd pr~imity To contact ER Region ~'UIC Pro,m, call (415) 744- to fedeBI, stat~ or tribally-designated Sourc~ater 2250. area~ Sole Source Aqu~r~ or other sensiti~ ground ~ter areas N~E: State and local g~ernments m~ have more stringent ground water protection regulations. PA United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Groun~'Vater EFA 909-F-00-002 Office(WTR-9) MAY 2000 Industrial Floor Drains and Ground Water Quality Floor drains in industrial and commercial settings can cause significant contamination if used improperly. While many industries have begun investing in cleaner technologies, floor drains remain an easy method of disposing of wash water that may contain small concentrations of hazardous or toxic chemicals. Floor drains may be plumbed to a municipal sewer line, or they m~ay just lead to a subsurface disposal point. When floor drains discharge to soil, the drain, the ~:?::~:. :. A~a!!e~ inj~ti0n pipes and all associated structures for conveyance of wastewater to soil are ':i .::~: ;i[~c!Udes ia~::subSur~e :i: called ashallow injection well. :!:?!::::.~X~ati~i: ~"!as a :: ~;!':~eili seepage pit sePtiC Used or spilled fuel, sol~nts, waste oil, paints, and other maintenance fluids :~.i'~:i~: :: :: :..::System; !each'fl~ld;: or pose a risk to the environment ~ut may be especially harmful if they enter ::i': ~!:!:I: ~rilii~ed':sumPthi:Ough i: someonei drinking ~eter supply Floor drains at facilities which use these :iiiii~ii!?.~i:~!i.:::::WhiCh vaste ~ate~::is ~: substances should be~aluated. Facility managers should k~oif floor dains :i: i~i~Sed b~l~i!~nd}:;: :.~?:=iii and other drains from singt~ilet$ shelvers etc.lead to a r~nicipal se/er line !i tea su~ce discharg¢or tea shalte injection ~ell. Shallev injection wells allo~este to percolate into s(Elecause of their potential to contaminate underground sources ieki~g ~ete( the/are regulated through Definition of motor vehic le waste disposal well: 144.81(16) the US. Saf~ DtnkingWater Act, Underground Injection Control (UIC) regulations Motor ~hicle ~aste disposal ~s Owners and operators of shalli~jection wells are usually not required to obtain (are defined as ells) that rece~' a fede~l pernit, I~t are required to submitvi~nto~/inbrmation to their state or or ha ve receiv ed fluids from fede~l Underground Injection Control (UIC) pnt~jns so that actions can be vehicular repair or maintenance taken where necessaF to prevent contamination of underground sources of activities such as an auto body ddnking ~ater. UIC prog~ns ha~e the authdty to request additionaldr~ation repair shop, new and used car about paticular veils, or require a pe~it if there is ~i~k of contamination from dealership specialty repair shop a facility State and local pr ograms may have more string ent permitting (e.g. transmission and muffler shop) or a~ facility that does a~n requirements than the ~deel regulations. vehicular repair work. Some types of industries have higher incidences of soil and ground water Fluids disposed in thesel~ m~' contamination than others. So some state and EPA UIC programs have permits contain organic and inorganic or other requirements for those particular industries or types of waste discharge. chemicals in concentrations that For examplethe construction of new motor vehicle waste disposal wells is exceed the maximum contaminant banned effective April 5, 2000 (nationwide) because of the potential for levels (MCLs) estalished b,/the pdmaF drinking ~er regulations such wells to discharge fuel and motor repair fluids to the ground. Existing (see 40 CFR Part 142). These motor vehicle waste disposal wells may be required to close or meet conditions fluids also ma y include waste of a discharge permit. petroleum products and ma y contain contaminantssuch as When the motor vehicle waste disposal well regulations were proposed, EPA als heavy metals and Matile organic proposed additional regulations for shallow injection wells receiving industrial compoundswhich pose ~sks to waste. Those regulations have not been adopted, but could apply in the future. human health. To help business owners and facility managers assess their environmental liability and comply with ground water protection regulations, EPA has prepared this information to accompany th~entory of Injection Wells form In order to be authorized to operate an injection well, owners or operators of injection wells are required to submit this information to EPA or to the delegated Underground Injection Control Program in their state. Here are steps to determine whether or not a facility uses Class V shallow injection wells: 1. Identify all floor drains and other possible points of entry to subsurface pipelines in hazardous material use/storage areas, fueling areas, wash bays, or industrial process areas. 2. Foreach drain, identify the draini~nal point of discharge . This may be achieved by presentation of sewer or holding tank permits, stamped, ias-builti' plans, by performing dye or smoke tests, looking at the pipe using downholE cameras, reviewing records of tank pumping, or simply by examining the floor drain grates or popping separator or sewer manhole covers. 3. If no absolute determination can be mades to where a pipe ends, or if you determine that it ends with disposal to soil, you have a shallow injection well. IF "4}URINJECTIO ELL NEEDSTO BE CLOSED: The regulations specify minimum requirements for closure of an injectionelt: P~144.89.You rrust plug or otherwise close thee/I in a manner that complies witl the prohibition of fluid me~ment standard in 1~144.12 and summa~ed in 11,144.82(a). If the UIC Prog ram Director in Fur State or F_~ Region has any additional or more specific closure standards/ou have to meet those standards to~'ou also mst dispose or otherwise manage ag soil, g~vel, sludgeliquid$or other ma0ets removed from or adjacent to ~ur well in accordance with all applical~ Federal, State and local regulations and requirement,sas in ~144.82 (b). EPA Region 9 requires that site chaacte~ization and closure of shalle~ injection veils where hazardous or toxic materials may be present be overseen and approved by a hazardous martials regulator from the local or state g~rnment (or ER) and be peerrmed I~ a qualified eHronmental pr~ssional. Federal closure guidance is a,ailaUe; call (415) 744- 2250. For state contactssee last page 4. Comply with the inventory requirement. (insert website xxxxxxx) EPA will share the information with the appropriate state and local agencies, who may get back to you about your Other Risk Factors: Present activities. Does facility manage hazardous materials, particularly solvents & other volatile compounds? (Examples: dry cleaner, auto body shop, metal platihflj))N are potentially hazardous fluids prevented from enteringa floor drain? What spill containment practices are used? Historic Activities. Were any former occupantsn of the site likely to have disposed hazardous or toxic waste to floor drains? Proximity to ground an~l surface water:How far is it to the nearest private or public drinking water well? How far is it to the nearest creek, river, lake or shore? Operations Permits. Do any permits you have on file with the local building or health department require you to monitor discharges to your floor drain? Sampling. Have you ever had the sludge below the drain analyzed by an environmental laboratory for toxic or hazardous constituents? DEFINITIONS FI MTHE UIC REGULA'IONS Exar~les of onsite~0~ designs B144.3 Changes to definitions andvadefinitions: cesspool, drywell, improved sinkhole, point of injection, sanit~rwaste, septic system, subs~e fluid dislJbution system, ~1, and well injection. Drywell means a well, other than an improv ed sinkhole or subsurface fluid distribution system, completed able the ~ter ta~ so that its bottom and sides are typically df except when receiving fluids Point of Injectiomeans the last accesl~sampling point p~or to waste fluids being released into the subsur~ce ervironment through a Cla~injection well. For e~ample thepoint of injectioof a Clas~ septic system might be the dibation bo( - the last accessil~ sampling point bE~ the ~ste fluids din into the unddrying soilsFor a d~/well, it is lilely to be the veil bore itself co~ta~antS ice~ a~wate'table =can flo~ith :grotj:nd wat%a ~or surfa0e dmha'ge prat (such ;as Sh6re cr~,=o~:sl:ing)::: ' SUMMARY' OF NEW SUBPART G (old citation dillo, vs) r~144.80 What is a Clas~/injection well? r~144.83 Inventor, j requirement(fr all ClassY well~ and (b) ~amples of iafmation which nyse requested from a specific ~11 o~vne[ (144.26, 144.27) r~144.84 C~te~a Dr authoization I~ rule to oPeate a ClassY injection ~ell, pemits and closure (144.26) r~144.85 Ne~v resttctions on large capacity cesspools and motor ehicle vaste disposal ~tls r~144.86 Inbrmation dr well o/ners regarding Source Water Assessments B144.89 Summary of steps required Dr closure or cor~ersion of injection such as ~astes collected from toilp_,~ever,~ ~ash basins sinks used~f cleaning domestic area~ks used (~r 6od prepa~tion, clothes~hing op~ion~ and sinks or washing machines where hod and b~age se~ing dishesglasses and utensils are cleaned.Sources of thes~es m~ include single or multiple residenc~tels and mote~sta~nts ~nkhousesschoolsanger statioRmr~ quaters guard stationscampgroundspicnic gmund~d~- use recreation areaether commemiM~lities and indust~l ~cilities preided the ~ste is not mi~d with indusial ~ste Septic syste~eans ~wellithat is used to emplace sanitaF waste bel~ the su~ce and is ~pically composed of a septic tank and subsudace fluid dist~tion system. Subsu~ce fluid distribution system means an' assem~ge of pedrated pipe~d~in tiles or other similar mechanisms intended toi~fluids below the su~ce of the ground. (njecton)~means~bored ~d ord~shaff whose depth s greater than the largest su~ce dimensionp[ a dug hole whose depth is greater thaq::: ~~ the largest sudace d mension' or an mproved ' ' ' ' stem ~in th~:~:~: S nkho e~ a subsu~ce flu d d~s~bon sy , . ~ ;:: i~:~l~h~g~e ~144.82 Prohibition of fluid ~ment, regulat6~tools to ensure protection, including stepscfosure ofetls that endanger~und rater. (40 CFR paY144.12) Sanitary Waste means liquid or solid wastes originating solely from humans and human activities r~144.81 ExamPles of types of Cla~swells For more information about Best Management Practices EPA Small Business Office: http:llwwvepa.go/Ismalltasinesslhelr:htm or call (§00) 368-5~88. EPA Compliance Assistance Centes: http :l lesepa.g~ loecalmainlcompasstl compcentershtml, G~3und V~ter PDtection/UIC Programs in ~ Region 9 CALl FORNIA Call E~ (415) 744-1834, or the California Regional ~er Quality Control Board near you www. swcb.ca.gov with links to assistancerfthese specific indui~l~s: automoti~ service, chemical~local geernment, metal finishing, paints and coatiog~inted wiing boards printing, and tmspotation EPA Region 9 ,automotive Pollution Prevention Guides, video: http:llwwwepa.go/IregionO91cross_pd p2/autofleet/indehtml Dry Cleaning: (independent site) http://wwwl .umn.edulmntaplP2iE~.lfs54-r17.htm THIS DOCUMEN'~an be devnloaded from: inse~ http:when availaUe HAWAII Call the Safe Drinking ~ter NEVADA Call the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Water Pmit Program (775) 687-4670 www. state.nus/ndep/ bwpc/bwpc01 .h~tm ARIZONA Call the Arizona Department of Environmental Branch, Hawaii INDIAN COUNTRY QualityAquifer Department of Healtl~all (415) 744-1839Protection Permit (808) 586-4258 http://wwwepa. Program, at (602) www. hawaii.gov/ gov/regionOg/ 207-4573 healthlehlsdwbl c~/ ww~Nadeq.state. in~ex.ntml -~'ndex.ntml az.us/environhNater To report your injection well, or request compliance assistance NATIONWIDE- CALL (800) 426-4791, the SAFE DRINKING ~0~'ER HOTLINE (E~.S.T B:A REGION 9 UIC PROGRAM: (415) 744-2250 U.S. Environmental Protection Age0(P~egj_o_n 9 Underg'ound Injection Control Pre~ (WTR-9) 75 HaNthone Street San Francisco CalL)mia 94105-3109 OFFICIAL BUSINESS - PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300 FIRST CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID U.S. EPA Permit No. G-35 February 7, 2001 FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Lita D. Freeman ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120 Alameda, Ca 94502 RE: Removal Action Workplan - Proposed Costco Site Rosedale Hwy at Standard Street Dear Ms. Freeman: This letter is to recapitulate and memorialize those issues we recently discussed in telephone conversation regarding the above referenced site. Before this Office can proceed any further with the review and approval of the project, it will be necessary for you to submit a revised workplan incorporating the following corrections: 1) This Office will be the lead agency for all hazardous materials, hazardous waste, & petroleum impacted soil remediation issues. All soil sampling activities shall be witnessed by a representative of this Office and all analytical results shall be submitted to this Office. 2) Permits are required to be obtained through this Office for removal of all aboveground storage tanks (AST's) and underground storage tanks (UST's). Permit applications and conditions are enclosed for your benefit. Please delete the reference to "KCEHSD" on page D- 1 of the workplan. 3) Kem County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) is, however, the lead agency for domestic and groundwater monitoring well destruction. This holds true for the Division of Oil and Gas (DOG) concerning oil well abandonment; as well as Air Pollution Control District (APCD) concerning asbestos abatement work~ In any event, please notify this Office of any activity occurring as described in Appendices I through L of the workplan so that an inspector from this Office can witness and verify the completion of those phases of the project. 4). This Office will be lead agency for the destruction of the Class V injection well and other shallow disposal of industrial wastewater clarifier systems. An EPA required post-closure inventory form has been previously e-mailed to you. Please amend Appendix E to eliminate "KCEHSD" references and substitute this Office as appropriate. USEPA Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells shall be utilized. 5) Removal of Septic Systems shall be performed under proper permits issued from the City of Bakersfield Building Department. Please amend Appendix F to eliminate "KCEHSD'references and substitute this Office as appropriate. USEPA Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells shall be utilized. Please submit a corrected workplan at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosures D February 7, 2001 FIRE CHIEF ,~ON FRAZE' ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H ' Slreet Bakerstield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 395-1349 PREVENTION SERVICE~ 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 326-0576 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakerstield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3979 FAX (661) 326-0576 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661) 399-5763 Lita D. Freeman ENSR International 1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120 Alameda, Ca 94502 RE: Removal Action Workplan - Proposed Costco Site Rosedale Hwy at Standard Street Dear Ms. Freeman: This letter is to' recapitulate and memorialize those issues we recently discussed in telephone conversation regarding the above referenced site. Before this Office can proceed any further with the review and approval of the project, it will be necessary for you to submit a revised workplan incorporating the following corrections: 1) This Office Will be the lead agency for all hazardous materials, hazardous waste, & petroleum impacted soil remediation issues. All soil sampling activities shall be witnessed by a representative of this Office and all analytical i'esults shall be submitted to this Office. 2) 3) Permits are required to be obtained through this Office for removal of all aboveground storage tanks (AST's) and underground storage tanks (UST's). Permit applications and conditions are enclOsed for your benefit. Please delete the reference to "KCEHSD" on page D- 1 of the workplan. Kem County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) is, however, the lead agency for domestic and groundwater monitoring well destruction. This holds true for the Division of Oil and Gas (DOG) concerning oil well abandonment,. as well as Air Pollution Control District (APCD) concerning asbestos abatement work. In any event, please notify this Office of any activity occurring as described in Appendices ! through L of the workplan so that an inspector from this Office can witness and verit~ the completion of those phases of the project. 4) This Office will be lead agency for the destruction of the Class V injection well and other shallow disposal of industrial wastewater clarifier systems. An EPA required post-closure inventory form has been previously e-mailed to you. Please amend Appendix E to eliminate "KCEHSD" references and substitute this Office as appropriate. USEPA Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells shall be utilized. 5) Removal of Septic Systems shall be performed under proper permits issued from the City of Bakersfield Building Department. Please amend Appendix F to eliminate "KCEHSD"references and substitute this Office as appropriate. USEPA Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells shall be utilized. Please submit a corrected workplan at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at 661-326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosures RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Business Name: ~-/1_~ f'-- Contact Name: Business Phone: ~"~ '~Z~g ~ 4~ ~ Inspector's Name: Time of Call: Date: Time: Type of Call: Incoming [ ] Outgoing Content of Call: /~-.~m~,.~ ~,,,~ c.)~L (~ # Min: Returned [ ] Actions Required: ~_~.h~c~ ~..3/,'" Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: FROM: TO: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM August 11, 2000 Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Servi Kirk Blair, Assistant Fire Chief Hazardous Materials Offsite. Co~equences Related tO the ~Proposed Costco Site. Some questions have surfaced regarding the safety and advisability of rezoning to accommodate' the new proposed Costco facility on Rosedale Highway just West of State Route 99. In order to address these concerns an evaluation of the hazardous materials reported to be used or stored in all of the businesses located in the area bordered by Rosedale Highway, Gilmore Avenue, Gibson Street and Highway 99 has been completed. This is a heavily industrial area and many hazardous materials are present in the businesses thatare included in this area. However, most of the ~'~ quantities are small or are of a nature that pose no hazardous materials threat to the site in '~ question. The one exception is the Las Palmas Oil and Dehydration facility located at 3121 Standard Street. - ...... The Las Palmas facility is located to the immediate North of the proposed Zone change site and report in their Chemical inventory, on file with Kern County Environmental Health an inventory of 15,000 barrels of Crude Oil, 15,000 barrels of Diesel Fuel, 9,000 barrels of Gasoline and 100 barrels of a Silicic Acid, sodium salt solution. A review of the site diagram on file shows that the gasoline and diesel fuel were stored in tanks near the southwest corner of the property somewhat near the south property line. These tanks do pose a moderate off site consequence that does impact the corner of the proposed Costco site. Due to the nature of the materials, ie. Gasoline and diesel fuel the off site onsequences are limited to fire and the worst credible case scenario would be a pool fn'e of the entire contents of- the tank in the secondary containment area. The calculations were made using US EPA offsite consequence analysis guidance with the end point being where a person could receive second degree bums from a 40 second exposure. The distance from the gasoline tanks calculated to be 101 feet. The distance from the diesel fuel tanks calculated to be 136 feet. Figure one shows an areal photograph of the area with the tanks in question identified and the offsite consequence area defined by circles with the distance from the outside of the tank to the edge of the circle being 101 feet and 136 feet respectively. Attachments 2 and 3 are the calculations used to make these distance estimates. Conclusion: Although, the tanks in question are currently empty or in the case of the diesel tank, filled with water, it is possible that these tanks could be leased again and used to contain diesel fuel or gasoline..It would be prUdent therefore, to require some mitigation to prevent a full scale pool fire from impacting the proposed Costco Site. A block wall possibly l0 feet tall should provide adequate thermal protection. REH/ed CC: R. Fraze H. Wines Martin Ortiz SCENARIO = POOL FIRE (GASOLINE) GASOLINE TANK: 9,000 BBL = 378,000 GAL SPG = 0.73 (5.9 lb/gal) IFORMULA: d' = PFFx 4.A BERMED AREA = 50' X 100' = POOL FIRE FACTOR: PFF = PFF = d' = 2,246,152 lbs of gasoline 5,000 f c ~' PFF= He,/ O.OOl 4'0.0929 ¥5,000(Hv + Cp (TB - 298) 5,000 = WATTS/m2 .(2na DEGREE BURN) He = HEAT OF COMBUSTION = 435.1 x 10S ~.$/kg "Hv' ="HEAT OF V~ORIZArl'~ON = 3.4 x 105 '~ J/kg Cp = LIQUID HEAT CAPACITY = ..494btu/lb -OF (4186.8)=2068.28 J/kg-°C Tb = BOILING TEMPERATURE = 400°K 298 = AMBIENT TEMP (75 °F) 0.0001= CONSTANT 0.0929 = CONVERSION FACTOR (METER 43,510,000. / 0,000 ! 4'0.0929 .5000 (3.14)(340,000+2068.28(400-298) 1.426 = 1.426 4'5000 = I 100,8 FEET Attachment 2 SCENARIO = POOL FIRE (DIESEL) DIESEL TANK: 15,000 BBL = 630,000 GAL SPG = 0.85 (6.9 lb/gal) = 4,358,970 lbs of diesel IFORMULA: d' = PFFx 4-A I BERMED AREA = 75'X 125' = 9,375 Ct ~' POOL FIRE FACTOR: PFF= He,/ 0,001 4-0.0929 ¥5,000(Hv + Cp (TB - 298) WHERE: ' 5,000 = WATTS/m= (2"a DEGREE BURN) Hc = HEAT OF COMBUSTION = 429 x 10.,?;J/kg Hv = HEAT OF VAPORIZATION = NOT PERTINENT = 0 Cp = LIQUID HEAT CAPACITY = '.461btu/lb -°F (4186.8)=1930..1 j/kg-°K Tb = BOILING TEMPERATURE = 585°K 298 = AMBIENT temp (°K) = (75 °F) 0.0001 = CONSTANT 0.0929 = CONVERSION FACTOR (METER2 TO FEET2) PFF = 42,900,000/ 0.0001 4'0.0929 = 1.4 ¥5 000 (3.14)(0+1930.1(585-298) d' = 1.4 x 4-9375 =1 135.6FEET Attachment 3 0 800 1600 Feet February 26, 2001 File No.: 8727-049 Mr. Todd Bartok Costco Wholesale 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, Washington 98027 Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: Estimated Remediation Costs Rosedale Highway Property Bakersfield, California Dear Mssrs. Bartok and Wines: ENSR International (ENSR) has prepared this letter regarding estimated costs for remediation. We understand that the City of Bakersfield Fire Department has requested this information. The site is located on the north side of Rosedale Highway between State Highway 99 and Gibson Street in Bakersfield, California. It is our understanding that Costco Wholesale (Costco) is considering acquisition of the five parcels that comprise this property. The parcels are referred to as the Sparks (consisting of two parcels), Glenn Rose, Seaton and Rosedale Hotel (Maaco) parcels. Historical uses of the site include oil production, vehicle maintenance and fueling. The proposed remediation is intended to address several environmental issues, including the presence of a 2.1 million gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) containing approximately 100,000 gallons of oil, 400,000 gallons of water and 420,000 gallons of oily sediment and sludge. Tasks to be accomplished at the site and estimated costs for completion of the tasks are presented in Table 1. These costs were prepared based on the available data, including investigations performed by other consultants, and our subsurface investigation at the site. The cost estimates are subject to change when and if additional information becomes available. The estimate of remediation costs presented herein have been prepared on the basis of the judgment and experience of an engineering professional. Applicable assumptions are noted in the table. Since ENSR has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, the general 8727-049 1 February 2001 inflation of prices, or over contractor's methods of determining prices, ENSR does not and cannot guarantee that the actual cost for additional investigations and remediation will not vary from the opinions of probable cost prepared by ENSR. We request that the City of Bakersfield keep the attached cost information confidential as contractor bids have not yet been received for the proposed work. Please call Lita Freeman at (510) 748-6700 or directly at (510) 748-6483, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ENSR International Lita D. Freeman, R.E.A. Senior Project Manager Mark C. Litzau, Senior Program Manager 8727-049 2 February 2001 Wines - Remediati0n Cost Estimate to City.doc P'~g~. Task Estimated Co oval of 2.1 million-gallon AST contents. oval and disposal of 2.1 million gallon AST (tank itself after contents removed). oval and disposal of impacted soils $1,000,000 - $1,250,0 $75,000-$100,000 $250,000-$350,000 oval and disposal of underground storage tanks $45,000-$60,000 ruction of clarifier and Class V shallow disposal well $30,000-$40,000 oval and disposal of septic systems $25,000-$35,000 oval and disposal of sumps $125,000-$150,000 oval and disposal of floor drains $10,000-$15,000 ruction of water supply wells $20,000-$25,000 ruction of groundwater monitoring wells bandonment of oil production wells $7,500-$10,000 $75,000-$300,000 ement of asbestos containing materials $15,000 - $20,000 te characterization for disposal $225,000-$275,000 ;$1.903 ~:.$2.63 milliOn Notes: These costs were prepared based on the available data. The cost estimates are subject to change when and if additional information becomes available. Due to uncertainties associated with the reabandonment of the oil wells, a wide range for reabandonment costs has been presented. We request that the City of Bakersfield keep the attached cost information confidential as contractor bids have not yet been received for the proposed work. 8727-049 February 2001 ' : Information ':. ;" '*' ' ~ ' Taken by. . ~______~_.,~',~I. ~' .-~ RESULTS OF . ':./ /- :~'" .~:-~': ,~"" * /? .... : . / - . ~' '": · ~ '.' , "~ .~- . . , ,, ~,~,~'¢~r. -.'~:,..':", · · ~',.' ,.~,~ ~:,:,,~:.4~,,,' ," ~' ',. .... ".. ,,' . .. .' '.:. . ~ , . · · . ,~;~-~.. ~?~'., · ·'INVESTIGATION ~~, / ~/'~ .,::~;~?L::f ;:~;?"~:~ ~':~' :~':: ,' · ~.~., /.:": ~.. *'.-,'..' . ;~ "- / ~[,~;:~.:??'- '~" ./~ // ~ .. ' :~.,. I* //' .. '* .' ":: ':..,t~'%.'~,..,:*..~'.':~'. :,."~:~ ,':;.-'.,:~?-"F. ,:.~.*P- ," · ' .'*'..';: '.7.,, , . . . . . . , , . .:, ... : ~' - ...,~,.', '"~. ,. ' ~ : .. ~ . "'.;.- ' ' '~ .r",:,':t ,"';~ ":~,":~, ?". ";"t'::: :. ::.~'sz',.~.,:: ' ~:.'.' ~ ,..,',.:~ '/'.. - , ,: . ~'..' /. .' ' ~ _. '.:..'' ~" · .:;. · ... :::~'.--.):::;~,,.::~".:::,:~ :?.....:,t.~--'::..",~..,.-~ ....... .:..:... : .' ',..';.'.: .... ~ Complainant notified ...." ' , ' * ' ~',-..: ...~ · ,::;7,.F ' ' -' '" "-' of results __ :lnVestlgate~ K~R~ COUNTY ENViRON~NTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPAF. T~ENT INVESTIGATION RECORD - HH~IP OWN'F]it/OPi£1-t,!Vi'OI~: DARR. EL SPAI~KS DBA: i-GC:.. VAN AND Sq"qr~.~,..-:~.~._" ?~ ADDRESS: ADD[{ESS OF VIO'I,ATION: 2800 S~ANEARD ST. BAKE~SE!ELD CA. 93308 ~'~'~ 32 - " kr~: 3 152-1&200-3 CT: 5 INSPECTOI~: GRAY WORK 02DER NUMBER: 50509 TRACKING NUMBER: 3785 CHRONOLOGICAL RECOR'D OF INVESTIGATION FILE NAME: I-GO VAN &'STORAGE DATE TIHg H~TIVE 11/05/92 1.0 iA J_!_.',-i/. 9 2 ~. 3 .5 SITE INsPEcTION MADE. UIC LOCATED AT EAST END OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE REPAIR BAY. THE WASH RACK LINE TERMINATES AT THE SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING AND DISCHARGES INTO A CLARiF!ER, THERE ARE THREE METAL PLATES WELDED TOGETHER THAI COVER THE CLARiFIER. AN EMPLOYEE OF BA~(ERSF!ELD - LA }IOTOR EXPRESS STATE[', THAT WASTE OiL iS ROUTINELY DISCHARGED iNTO THE "WASTE OiL TANK" AND POINTED TOWARD THE >~ETAL ~ETURNED TO SITE. BAKERSFIELD MOTOR EXPBESS ESiPLOYEES REMOVED THE METAL PLATE COVER. THERE iS A THREE SYAGE CLARiFiER. THE LASY CHAlqBER APPEARS TO BE A DRYWELL TYPW'OF CONSYRUCT:fffak'. P.,'i.i~FgRMED PROPERTY SE:IRCH. WF::.'::TE ;,.'.:RAFT O;Y iNiTiAL k:OY.T_CE CA.XiE BACK. FC:RW.:\RDi?~C- 2RDER EXPIRED, RETURN q'O SENDER F'.xr r Er' B",'-;'F''~-'rl;'I r~ LA >!OTOR EXPRESS, THEY SAiD 'I'HA~. ~PARKS STILL 9 [Ct(ED UP HAiL AY YHZ S[TE, F.'.E.q_\I L!i'D .X'OTIC~E PA.'T.~. ............. ?.!_ ~__~.E__ NARRATIVE .................................. (H~___) !:::bLd/..:,'_,_.,_ .......... t0/_.28/93 PREPARE & LA3EL PHOTOS :,')R FILE. RRSi_\RC:':IED Fi/','DINO ALTERNATE ADDR'ESS FOR SPARRS. CALLED DISC iO SEE IF THEY HAD AN ADDRESS EO[:~ SPARKS. TI{EY ONLY :i:.~D iHE :-~D~9R[~oa FOP G!L}fC;,R~' '~'~}-. LYDIA '.,.'ON SYDOW, KCEHSD, CONDUCTED SE:',.~"-::,..:-: AT RECORDS DEPT'. TO DETERHiNE ADDRESS FOR. SPAR'KS. UNSUCCESSFUL. PREPARED DRAFT NOTICE OF 2ND NOTICE. HAILED 2ND NOTICE NOTED ABOVE. REFERRED CASE TO US-EPA FOR REGUL:\TORY COSiPLIANCE. DRAFTED LETTER TO EPA REGARDING USE O'F UIC BY J & J TRUCK WASH. HAILED AB,_,,E LETTER TO EPA. ~,,~ 'r ' COPY ""- L~-TTER TO R~_E.~\ED DISC :,XD RW~CB !NViT.ENO THEH TO~T"ITtATE.', ENFORCEHENT pe-roe,.,~..,., TO EPA E.x;FC;RCEHENT. o o o 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST BEGIN UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST COMPLETE COMPLAINT FORM ASSIGN A TRACKING NUMBER (LIST ON COMPLAINT FORM) BEGIN A FILE FOLDER FOR CASE (IF NECESSARY) RESEARCH PROPERTY RECORD FOR OWNERSHIP (IF NEEDED) ATTACH APN MAP TO FILE (IF NEEDED) COMPLETE WORK ORDER LOG SHEET ( ! PER EACH RESPONSIBLE PARTY) COMPLETE SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST & UIC PROGRAM FORM PROP 65 REPORT (IF NEEDED) DRAFT NOTIFICATION LETTER(S) (REVIEWED BY JOE CANAS) NOTIFICATION LETTER(S) SECOND NOTICE (IF NECESSARY) HEARING NOTICE(IF NECESSARY) REFERRAL TO E.P.A. (IF NECESSARY) WITNESS INITIAL SAMPLING REVIEW ANALYSIS [/]"'FILE PAGE 1 (INITIALS) FILE [...~'" F I nE [~)r'~FiLE [ ] ACCOUNTING [~EPA DISK .FILE HARD FILE [ ] RWQCB [ ] FILE [ ] JANET [ ] ~'OWNER ]~.OPERATOR FILE ~d'~RWQCB CC'S [ ] OWNER [ ] OPERATOR [ ] FILE [ ] [ l [ ] ~OWNER [ ] OPERATOR i.-~FILE UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST 16(a)'. RECOMMEND CLOSURE WITHOUT SITE [ ] CHARACTERIZATION 16(a)(1). REQUEST DETAILS AND DOCUMENTATION FOR CLOSURE OF UIC 16(a)(2). ISSUE CLOSURE LETTER FOR SITES WITHOUT CHARACTERIZATION 16(a)(3). COMPLETE WORK ORDER CLOSURE FORM [ ] 16(b)(1) 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. [ ] FILE [ ] EPA [ ] RWQCB [ ] FILE [ ] ACCOUNTING 16(a)(4). PUT ABATE DATE AND ABATEMENT [ ] ACTION IN COMPUTER FILE 16(a)(5). LOG FILE INTO FACILITIES FILES [ ] 16(a)(6). TAKE FILE TO FILE ROOM [ ] 16(b) ' RECOMMEND ADDITIONAL SITE [ ] CHARACTERIZATION INPUT DATA TO REFLECT CASE [ ] REASSIGNMENT MAIL LETTER REQUESTING SITE' CHARACTERIZATION REVIEW & APPROVAL OF WORKPLAN [ ] SITE CHARACTERIZATION & FIELDWORK [ ] REVIEW SITE CHARACTERIZATION [ ] REPORT REMEDIATION (IF NECESSARY) CLOSURE LETTER ISSUE WORK ORDER CLOSURE SHEET PAGE 2 (INITIALS) [ ] 24. [ ] PUT ABATE DATE AND ABATEMENT ACTION INTO COMPUTER FILE [ ] [ ] [ I [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] ACCOUNTING [ ] [ ] 25. LOG FILE INTO FACILITIES FILES [ ] 26. TAKE COMPLETED FILE TO FILE ROOM [ ] [ ] [ ] UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, Ca. 94105-3901 00T 27 1993 Mail Code: W-6-2 Gerald.White, Unit Chief Surveillance and Enforcement Branch Department of Toxic Substances Control, Region 1 1515 Tollhouse Road Clovis, CA 93612 Dear Mr. White: As you know, the Kern County Environmental Health Services DePartment has received a groundwater protection pilot project grant from the USEPA to investigate the disposal of industrial waste into shallow injection wells. Recently, the County requested soil and injectate sampling from two facilities in Bakersfield I Go Van & Storage and Bakersfield Truck Stop. To date, both of these companies have refused to comply with the County's requests. Therefore, we are inviting your department and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to assume oversight of possible further site investigation and mitigation. If you are interested in accepting the referrals, please let us know within the next thirty days. To give you.some background information: I-Go Van & Storage is a former truck maintenance shop recently occupied by J & J Truck Wash. A drain at I-Go stretching the length of the east service bay receives truck wash water which flows to an oil/water separator and from there to an .injection well. When Kern County inspectors visited the site in April they noticed water (probably truck wash water) dripping into the drain that discharges to the well and saw that quite a few barrels had been stored in the bay. The County attempted to send notices of violation to .the property owner requesting wastestream sampling, but the owner had moved without leaving a forwarding address. See the enclosed case file for more information. Bakersfield Truck Stop is a truck maintenance yard that discharges wash water and waste fluids into a large sump/pond. Kern County inspected this facility in August 1992, noting that the sump, though dry at the~time, was stained black as if oily water had been disposed there. A subsequent notice of violation from the County to the property owner requested sampling of the sludge in the sump. Though the property owner did conduct the initial sampling, he failed to comply with later requests for more sampling Printed on Recycled Paper and for remediation. information. See the enclosed case file for more If you need further information about these referrals, you can reach me at (415) 744-1817. Questions pertaining to case details should be directed to Terry Gray, Kern County Hazardous Materials Inspector, at (805) 861-3636, or to Cynthia Brouwers, USEPA Project Officer, at (415) 744-1839. If you plan to' visit the facility, I suggest you contact Kern'County to coordinate any inspection. Sincerel~ Drinking Water and Ground Water Protection Branch enclosures cc: Joe Cahas, Program Manager Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services Ruben Medina Department of Toxic Substances Control, Region 1 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. DIRECTOR 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakerefield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX October 18, 1993 Ms. Cynthia Brouwers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Mail Code: W-6-2 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Attention: Cynthia Brouwers SUBJECT: I-GO VAN . AND STORAGE REFERRAL CASE, 2800 STANDARD ROAD, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 7TH Dear Ms. Brouwers: EnclOsed is a copy of the information we discussed on October 14, 1993. You will note the facility appears to be washing several types of trucks. It is of concern because the waste water disposal system appears to have been previously identified as a Class V shallow disposal well. If you have any questions or we can be of further help, please call me at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Stev~ McCalley, Director By: Terry L. Gray Hazardous Materials Inspector " Hazardous Materials Management Program TLG:cas ~gray~i-govan.let OCT 12 '93 16:~2 1¢0 PO1 OCT 1~ ~93 16:D~ 100 P02 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. DIRECTOR 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX June 25, 1993 Ms. Cynthia Brouwers U. S. Environmental 'Protection Agency Region IX Mail Code: W-6-2 .75 Hawthorne Street San. Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Attention: Cynthia Brouwers BAKERSFIELD TRUCK STOP AND I-GO VAN AND STORAGE REFERRAL CASES Dear Ms. Brouwers: Enclosed is the case file we discussed on April 29, 1993. This case is one where we have not obtained compliance and is being referred to EPA for further action. If you have any questions or we can be of further help, please call me at (80~5) 861-3636. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director By: Terry L. Gray ~ Hazardous Materials Inspector Hazardous Materials Management Program TLG:ch gray~eferral.epa ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. DIRECTOR 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX Darrel and Jody Sparks' 2800 Standard Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 -March 23, 1993 SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT 2800 STANDARD STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sparks: A violation notice was mailed to you on November 30, 1992, directing you to initiate compliance with' EPA-Region 9 Guidelines for Closure of Shallow Disposal Wells. Our records indicate that compliance has not been obtained at the site noted above. You must comply with the original order dated November 30, 1992, by April 30, 1993. Failure to comply will result in the referral of this case to Region 9 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for prosecution. If you have any questions regarding this order, you may contact this Department at (805) 861-3636, Extension 582. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director' By: Terry L. Gray Hazardous Materials Inspector Hazardous Materials Management Program TLG:cas CC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ATTN: Martin Zeleznik Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno ATTN: Dale Essary ~gray~igo.2nd ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S. .DIRECTOR 2700 "M" Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 861'-3636 (805) 861-3429 FAX November 30, 1992 Darrel and Jody Sparks ' 6000 Landfair Drive - Bakersfield, CA 93309 SUBJECT: CLASS V SHALLOW INJECTION WELL LOCATED AT 2800 STANDARD STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sparks: This' letter is an official notice to inform you that the property noted above has been determined by Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD) to be the site of a Class V shallow injection well. The well has been identified as a wash rack. This notice is being sent to you because you are the owner of the property listed above. · Pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations 40, (40 CFR), Section 144.12 (a), provides that "no owner or operator shalL.operate [an injection well]...in a manner that allows the movement of fluid containing any contaminant into underground sources of drinking water, if the presence of that contaminant may cause a violation of any primary drinking water regulation...or may otherwise adversely affect the health of persons." Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice, compliance must be initiated with the guidelines cited in the enclosed copy of EPA-REGION 9 GUIDELINES FOR CLOSURE OF SHALLOW DISPOSAL WELLS. The booklet cites the minimum requirements for site work plan activities, contractor requirements, example illustrations of well designs, and .sampling methods and procedures. Be advised that KCEHSD may have additional requirements not listed in the EPA closure guideline booklet. In accordance with Kern County Ordinance Code G-5541, Section 8.04.100, the Department is authorized to charge for inspections, review of reports, and laboratory service costs incurred in the process of obtaining compliance with any violations noted. Be advised that you will be billed at the rate of $24.80 per hour for oversight during the abatement of violations connected to the Class V shallow injection well. ( Darrel and Jody Sparks Class V Shallow Injection Well November 30, 1992 Page 2 If we may be of any further assistance, please contact this Department at (805) 861-3636. Sincerely, Steve McCalley, Director By: Terry L. Gray Hazardous Materials Inspector Hazardous Materials Management Program TLG:ch cc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ATTN: Martin Zeleznik Regional Water Quality Control Board - Fresno ATI'N: Dale Essary Bakersfield Los Angeles Motor Express ATTN: Patsy Newton gray~igo, uic KERN COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE INCIDENT REPORT REPORTING AGENCY REPORTING PERSON PHONE KERN CO. ENV. HEALTH SERVICES LOCATION OF DISCHARGE OR THREATENED DISCHARGE LYDIA V. VON SYDOW (805) 861-3636 DATE AND TIME OF KNOWLEDGE OF DISCHAROE OR THREATENED DISCHARGE STREET ADDRESS: 2800 STANDARD ST 11/05/92 HOUHS CITY: BAKERSFIELD ZIP: 93308 SEC: T i DBA I-GO VAN AND STORAGE PROPERTY OWNER: DARRELL AND JODY SPARKS NAME AND ADDRESS OF PARTY RESPONSIBLE OF DISCHARGE: DARRELL AND JODY SPARKS, 6000 LANDFA[R, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 AREA TYPE SCENE TYPE: OI__iMDUSTRIAL 04__RURAL/AGRI Oi___STATE HWY .05__PUBLIC STRUCTURE 09__OTHER WATER WELL 13__WOODED AREA 02_X_COMMERCIAL OS__WILD LANDS 02___COUNTY RD 06_X_PRIVATE STRUCTURE iO__AIHPORT/RAILIARD 14__DESERT 03__RESIDENTIAL 03__CITY RD 07__CANAL/WATERWAY ll___EMPTY LOT IS___RRUSHLAND 99___OTHER: 04___PRIVATE RD 08__DOMESTIC WATER WELL 12__LAKE/POND 16___OILFIELD SOURCE OF RELEASE CIRCUMSTANCES OF RELEASE CAUSE OF RELEASE OI___OIL REFINERY Oi___WHILE BEING MANUFACTURED ll___DURiNG CONTAINER OI___E~U[PMENT FAILURE 02___CHEM, MANUFACTURER 02__WHILE IN STORAGE OR CONDUIT REPAIR 02___VANDALISM 03_X_MISC, FIXED FACILITY 03_X_DURING NORMAL END USE lZ___[LLEGAL DISPOSAL 03___^CT OF NATURE 04___MOTOR VEHICLE 04__WHILE BEING LOADED 96__THREATENED RELEASE 04___ACCIDENT OS___TRAIN OS___WHILE IN TRANSIT ONLY: NO DISCHARGE {)S___iLLEGAL DISPOSAL O6___A[RCRAFT OH__WHILE VEHICLE PARKED 97___RELEASE OR iNCIDENT 98___UNKNOWN 07___PIPELINE O?__DURINO VEHICLE ACC[DENT MITIGATED AT TIME 99_X_OTHER:[NJECTION WELL 08___UNDERGROUND TANK 08__DURING F[RE/EXPL. OF REPORT 98___UNKNOWN 09__DURING AIR CRASH ~8___UNKNOWN 99___0THER: ............... 10___WHILE ABANDONED 99___0THER: LIST THE ONE, TWO, OR THREE MOST SIGNIFICANT SUBSTANCES DISCHARGED OR THREATENED TO BE DISCHARGED: CHEM, NAME/MAJOR COMPONENT: DIESEL COMMON NAME: HAZARD:J_TOXIC __FLAMMABLE ___PURE ___SOLID ___REACTIVE __CORROSIVE __MIX ___LIQ. __RADIOACTIVE __WASTE ___GAS DOT ID NUMBER: 1204 CHEM. NAME/MAJOR COMPONENT: WASTE OIL COMMON NAME: HAZARD:_X_TOXIC ___FLAMNABLE ___PURE ___SOLID ___REACTIVE ___CORROSIVE ___NIX __LIQ, ___RADIOACTIVE ___WASTE ___,2AS DOT ID NUMBER: CHEM, NAME/MAJOR COMPONENT: COMMON NAME: HAZARD:___TOXIC ___FLAMHARLE ___PURE ___SOLID ___REACTIVE ___CORROSIVE __iIX ___LIS, .... RADIOACTIVE ___WASTE ___GAS DOT ID NUMBER: CONCENTRATION AMOUNT AT RISK AMOUNT HELEASED CHEMICAL { CHEMICAL { CHEMICAL {1{ 11{ i3{ 131 {31 iMPORTANT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/DETAILS: HEALTH AND [ND[CATE ACTUAL {"A"} OR POTENTIAL {~P~) CHEM 1 CHEM ~. CHEM 3 OI___AIR 02__CANAL/WATERWAY 03___LAKE/POND 04_X_SOIL 05__=CROPS. 06__LIVESTOCK O?___W[LDL[FE 08___~OODED AREA 09___DESERT IO___BRUSHLAND [[__FOODSTUFFS 12___I]ROUNDWATER 13___DWELLING 14__HUMANS ~9___OTHER: [NTEENAL USE ONLY: iDENTIFICATION { [NVEST[OATIO~ REFERRAL MADE TO: HEALTH RiSK ^$$ESSMENT RANEINO: iNFORMATION PHONED-iN? ¥___ ~___ IF YES, DATE ..... TAKEN BY: DATE REPORT RZCEIVED 8¥ H~ALTH DEPT: COMPUTER INPUT (CHECK)C.,LEEK'~ INITIALS DATE OF NOTIFICATIO~ OF HEALTH OFFICER DATE OF NOTIFICATION OF MEDIA UIC SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST 11/92 PAGE FACILITY NAME: I-GO VAN & STORAGE DATE OF INSPECTION: 11/05/92 TIME: INSPECTOR(S): TERRY GRAY & LYDIA VON SYDOW ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS: LYDIA VON'SYDOW (KCEHSD) I. GENERAL INFORMATIO~ A. INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND ALL OTHERS (SHOW CREDENTIALS) B. EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE THERE. (LEGAL INFO) OWNERS NAME: I-GO VAN & STORAGE ADDRESS: 6000 LANDFAIR DR CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA PHONE NUMBER: ZIP: .93308 OPERATOR'S NAME: BAKERSFIELD LOS ANGELES MOTOR EXPRESS ADDRESS: 2800 STANDARD ST. CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE: CA ZIP: 93308 APN: PHONE NUMBER: 805-327-9136 (SWAP BUSINESS CARDS, ALSO ASK FOR BUSINESS LICENSE) PARENT COMPANY: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ARE THEY A SUBSIDIARY OF A CORPORATION: ARE THEY INCORPORATED IN THE STATE: YES ZIP: II. CONTACT PERSON: PHONE NUMBER: INTERVIEW THE oPERATOR/NATURE OF BUSINESS A. HOW LONG IN BUSINESS: B. ARE THEY A MEMBER OF AN ASSOCIATION: C. ARE THEY AWARE OF ANY LOCATION/OWNERSHIP: WATER SUPPLY WELL SITE HISTORY YEARS OF OCCUPATION: PREVIOUS OWNERS: PREVIOUS OPERATORS: PREVIOUS USES OF FACILITY: III. Go H. I. J. PAGE 2 PRODUCTS OR SERVICES OFFERED: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ANY PROCESS, MAINTENANCE THAT PRODUCES WASTE: WHAT CHEMICALS ARE STORED ON SITE: DO THEY HAVE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS: DESCRIBE THE WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES: SOLVENT HAULER: VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: HOW OFTEN: WASTE HAULER: VERIFICATION RECEIPTS: HOW OFTEN: ASK FOR SITE MAPS OF FACILITY AND AS-BUILTS, PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: INSPECT THE FACILITY GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS HOUSEKEEPING: FAIR EASE OF ENTRY: FAIR COOPERATION: FAIR SURROUNDING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL GENERAL APPEARANCE OF THE WELL(S): CLARIFIER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPILLS: YES CLASS V WELL(S): ONE STATUS: ACTIVE YEARS OF OPERATION: OIL/WATER SEPARATOR, OR GREASE TRAP USED: CLARIFIER ARE THE WELLS PUMPED OUT: HOW OFTEN: So OPERATION, OR THREE STAGE F. DO THE WELLS EVER GET PLUGGED UP: ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 PAGE 3 Go CONSTRUCTION DETAILS TOTAL DEPTH: DIAMETER: CASING (MEASURE): ARE THE INJECTION WELLS REGULATED BY A STATE OR LOCAL PROGRAM: RWQCB I. ·PERMIT: NO J. HOW ARE SPILLS OR ACCIDENTS HANDLED: WHERE DOES THE FLOOR/LOT DRAINAGE WATER GO: LOT DRAINAGE DISCHARGES TO THE STREET ne CAR WASH: NO HOW IS THE EFFLUENT DISPOSED: CLEANERS USED: M. HOW MANY AUTOS ARE SERVICED DAILY: DOCUMENTS-~O REQUEST MAP OF'FACILITY AS-BUILT DIAGRAMS, PLUMBING P~ANS DRILLERS LOGS MONITORING WELL DATA FLOW DIAGRAM OF PROCESSES, WASTE GENERATION, AND DISPOSAL MANIFESTS FOR WASTE DISPOSAL MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT AGENCY: KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR: TERRY GRAY FACILITY INFORMATION FACILITY NAME: I-GO VAN & STORAGE PARENT COMPANY: ADDRESS: 2800 STANDARD ST CITY: BAKERSFIELD STATE] CA ZIP: 93308 CONTACT NAME: POSITION: DESCRIPTION OF WASTE STREAM: TRUCK MAINTAINENCE DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL: CLARIFIER DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY THAT MAY ENDANGER GROUND WATER BUT NOT RELATED TO INJECTION WELLS OR TANKS (e.g. PONDS, SPILLS : INSPECTION INFORMATION INSPECTION DATE: 11/05/92 NUMBER OF WELLS: 1 AUTO SERVICE: YES STORM WATER: STATUS OF WELLS ACTIVE: YES ABANDONED: INJECTATE SAMPLED: NO VIOLATION FOUND: YES FOLLOW-UP NEEDED: yes RCRA FACILITY: INDUSTRIAL WASTE: OTHER: AGRICULTURAL WASTE: UNDER CONSTRUCTION: OTHER: COMMENTS: Trackin~ #:~ ~'~oc'~ APN: - - - WOF~ LOG SHKKT Work Order #: WO Category: Hazmat~ WO Type: ~: Reimb.: Y I~ N RP Code: WORK ORDER NAME: RESPONSIBLE PARTY (RP) NAME: RP CONTACT: RP ADDRESS STATE: ZIP: ?Z~FO? + RP PHONE NOS.: INSPECTOR: PROGRAM: DESCRIPTION: ( ) (__) / EXT. HMMP-Permitting LOCATION: FACILITY NAME: REPORTING PERSON COMMENTS: ,:_.-.,~ PHONE NO. /~f'~ ~;'0 ~,~ S Tracking APN: Work Order #: EMO~"~. ~O9 WO Category: Hazmats WO Type: _..,~-~ Refmb.: Y N / RP Code: WORK ORDER NAME: RESPONSIBLE PARTY (RP) NAME: RP CONTACT: RP ADDRESS: STATE: '~-/3 ZIP: ~-?..~:~OS~ + RP PHONE NOS.: INSPECTOR: PROGRAM: DESCRIPTION:' EXT. .9' HMMP-Permitting LOCATION: FACILITY NAME: REPORTING PERSON: COMMENTS: PHONE NO. ~ARCEL' NLIi'4BERS NFtICH CORRESPOND TO SPARKS POSiT[ON CURSOR NEXT TO PARCEL, THEN PRESS ENTER TO DISPLAY SEC PROPERTY DATA 186-112-02-00-? ]86-162-15-00-0 188'086-09-00-2 .186-142-03-00-9 178-402-04-00-8 386-220-26-00-3 386-220-27-00-6 386-220-18-00-0 361-106-01-00-6 332-152-37-00-6 332-152-38-00-9 362-035-07-00-4 082-340-25-00-0 332-152-10-00-? '-- 332-152-12-00-3 332-152-39-00-2 332-152"40-00-4 ~ 332-162-06-00-9 C CURRENT FILE HIT PF1 FOR MORE PARCELS OR ENTER NEXT RECORD RECORD REQUEST - 24-26 SA B 8 8 B P 8 8 .8 8 P = ROLL BEING PREPARED FILE SPARKS CLOVIS G & DOROTHY SPARKS CLOVIS G & DOROTHY SPARKS CLOVIS G & DOROTHY SPARKS CLOVIS G & DOROTHY F SPARKS CURTIS SPARKS CURTIS & JUDY SPARKS CURTIS & JUDY SPARKS CURTIS ET AL SPARKS CURTIS G & JUDY K SPARKS D L & MARY J TRS SPARKS D L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DAN W SPARKS DANIEL SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR SPARKS DARREL & JOOY TR SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR B = BOTH FILES TOTAL PARCELS DISPLAYED SO FAR KS IN II S1 A3 KB 36 PARCEL NUM8ERS WHICH CORRESPOND TO SPARKS POSITION CURSOR NEXT TO PARCEL, THEN PRESS ENTER TO DISPLAY SEC PROPERTY DATA "-355-094-0?-00-3 8 332-152-37-00-6 B 332-152-38-00-9 ' 8 332-152-12-00-3 C ,405-050-08-00-0 8 $405-050-09-00-3 B · ~405-101-01-00-0 B 332-152-10-0.0-? P 332-152-12-00-3 332-152-39-00-2 332-152-40-00-4 332-162-08-00-9 '355-094-07-00-3 366-311-06-00-2 351-411-29-00-0 412-053-25-00-2 360-253-02-00-8 087-033-21-00-8 C = CURRENT FILE HiT PF'I FOR MORE PARCELS OR ENTER NEXT RECORD RECORD REQUEST - '24-26 SA MW ROLL BEING PREPARED FILE SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR SPARKS DARRELL & JODY TR SPARKS DARRELL & JODY TR SPARKS DARRELL & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J ,SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS' SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS SPARKS DARRELL L JR & ANGELA M SPARKS DARRELL WAYNE & SHANNON SPARKS DAVIO & DEANNA SPARKS DEAN EVAN & RONNETTE T SPARKS 0ONALO R & MARY F B = BOTH FIL S TOTAL PARCELS DISPLAYED SO FAR KS IM II S1 A3 KB 54 G MR I. 75A¢. 7.08.4C. I P.M. 5907 I I I 9.71AC I I I too A J~.?~ I BRIAN L 74A C ¢ 2.50AC I I 11.9,9 I I I 15 4(~ ..:::. ,:~,:: . ::.. ... l (~) COUNTY OF KERN · ~-16 'CLOVE.RLEAi~ TRACT. 57-3.9. /1' ® ~~'~AC' ~. 3,~ AC (~\ PTN. OF SEC. 23, T. 29 S. R. 27 E. ms: /-/7 ® I,~ 220./O ~CHOOL I I I I,~1 0 4 V MH=Foc mobilehome A.P.N. see page 41 pu~'po~es of zoning ~. au~lvlslo& lew. i ASSESSORS MAP NO~ TRACT 3,622 PTN. OF Nl/2 '® SEC. I0 T. 30S. R.27E. .@ s® ,® 38 39 ,,s ® © ,Po ,,,,® ® ® ~o ,® ASSESSORS. Q Sj $5 25 MAP. N~..3..5_.5.-.~_9..~:, 332-152-10.-00-? RD1] 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - SPLIT SOLIRCE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR Oeed 06563-125'1 08/29/91 80~ cd 86251 SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 96156 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bfi]l 3?4? GILMORE AVE - Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Sff'te 0 S-CD FROM 332-150-52-00-5 L/S A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres 9.71 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 8?5,295 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pets/Prop Exemptfions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 8?5,295 VALUES CHANGED 06/05/86 ******************************************************************************* *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY mFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PF.I? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 152 10 00 ? File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-152-12-00-3 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR 801 cd 86251 SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 32030 CV 86154 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bi]] 374? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR FROM 332-150-58-00-3 L/S 1 8/TP TR/RG P3731 Acres Deed 06563~1250 08/29/91 OIL FLD R1 OPER 96 S-CD 4.49 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 458,114 Imprvmnts Other Imps 137,080 Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 595,194 VALUES CHANGED 06/03/86 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. ,EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 152 12 00 3 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA .MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB :3:32-152-39-00-2 Roll t FI Area Code 057-038 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR 801 cd 92308 SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS ~se 30300 CV 92170 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 9:3308 Census 8il1 ~747 GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 'Zoning Site EXC MR FROM 332-152-10-00-? L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres VALUES *** Mineral Market ( E BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - .ACTIVE Deed 06563-1251 08/29/91 Imprvmnts Other Imps Land 3?9,?38 S-CD 4.13 CP Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 379,738 VALUES CHANGED 06/18/92 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PFI' TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 152 39 00 2 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 43 KB 332-152-40-00-4 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR Deed 06563-1251 08/29/91 801 cd 92308.SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 92170 Not'f 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census 8i]] 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR S-CD FROM 332-152-10-00-? L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres 4.96 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 456,055 Impnvmnts Other Imps Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 456,055 VALUES CHANGED 06/18/92 ******************************************************************************* *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ********************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 152 40 00 4 File - P EVENT- 24:22 SA MW KS IN II S1 43 KB :332-162-06-00-9 Roil 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name. SPARKS DARREL.& JODY TR 'Deed 06563-1248 08/29/91 801 cd SO 3 %SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Lise 36010 CV 81134 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX 8AKERSF[ELO CA 93308 Census 8i77 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord SAKERSFIELO CA 93308 Zonffng S~te 3741 G.TL.~.',C)~ ¢~\/E BAKERSFIELD S-CD L/S P 14 B/TP &15 TR/RG CVRLF Acres 1.00 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 106,311 Imprvmnts Other Imps 171,075 Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 277,386 VALUES CHANGED 05/14/81 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** ~ PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PFg/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* En~ep parcel.number 332 162 06 00 9 Fff]e - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 K8 355-094-0?-00-3 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 001-049 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR Deed 06563-1249 08/29/91 801 cd SD 4 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 01010 CV 81030 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bi]~ 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zonffng Site 6000 LANDFAIR DR BAKERSFIELD S-CD FROM 340-124-07-00-3 L/S ? B/TP TR/RG 3622 Acres CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Imprvmnts Other Imps Pets/Prop Exemptions Market 13,587 96,223 H ?,000 N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 102,810 VALUES CHANGED 01/30/81 ******************************************************************************* * *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY *' * PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT * PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 355 094 07 00 3 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IN II S~ A3 KB 332-152-37-00-6 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARRELL & JODY TR Deed 06563-1254 08/29/91 801 cd 92308 SD 3 ~SPARKS D L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 92170 Notf 374? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coond BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR S-CD FROM 332-152-10-00-? CP L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres VALUES *** Mineral Market Land Imprvmnts Other ImPs Pets/Prop Exemptions 19,308 N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 19,308 VALUES CHANGED 06/18/92 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED Enter parcel number 332 152 37 00 6 File - P EVENT- 24=22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-152-38-00-9 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARRELL & JODY TR Deed 06563-1253 08/29/91 80t cd 92308 SD 3 ~SPARKS D L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 92170 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR S-CD FROM 332-152-10-00-? CP L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 37,698 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 3?,698 VALUES CHANGED 06/18/92 ******************************************************************************* * *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY ~ PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT * PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER * PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED Enter parcel number 332 152 38 00 9 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MN KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-]52-12-00-3 Roll t FILE BEING PREPARE0 93 STATUS - ACTIVE .Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARREL & JODY TR 80l cd 86251 SO 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY .J TRS Use'32030 CV 88154 Not¢ 3?47 GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? G£LMORE AVE Coopd BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR ?ROM 332-150-58-00-3 L/S VALUES Marke~ Deed 06563-1250 08/29/91 Mineral I 8/TP TR/RG P3731 Acres Land .Imprvmnts Other Imps 458,114 137;080 OIL FL0 R1 OPER 96 S-CD 4.49 CP Pens/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 595,194 VALUES CHANGED 06/03/86 *~* NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PFi/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEE0 Enter parcel number 332 152 12 00 3 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 K8 405-050-08-00-0 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 001-018 Name SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J 801 cd SD 2 Use 00700 CV 81030 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE. KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site THAT PTN OF LOT 9 LYING ELY OF STATE HWY FROM 338-130-02-00-6 L/S 13 B/TP 30 TR/RG 2? Acres 3.85 CP Deed 06572-1301 09/24/91 ET AL DEED 06561-1093 S-CD VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 35,271 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 35,271 VALUES CHANGED 01/30/81 * *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT * * PF9,/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH Enter parcel number 405 050 08 O0 0 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 405-05(3-09-00-3 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPAREO 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 001-018 Name SPARKS DARRELL L & NARY J Deed 05572-i301 09/24/91 801 cd SD 2 ET AL OEED 0656]-1093 Use 10200 CV 81030 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELO CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coond BAKERSFIELO CA 93308 Zoning SiTe THAT PTN OF LOT 10 LYING ELY OF STATE HNY S-CD FROM 338-130-16-00-? L/S 13 8/TP 30 TR/RG 2? Acres 1.05 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 13,129 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pers/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 13,129 VALUES CHANGED 01/30/8] ******************************************************************************* * *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL'RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX'INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * * PF5/8} NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT * PF~/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/N FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH Enter pance] number 405 050 09 00 3 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MN KS IM II S1 A3 KB 405-101-01-00-0 Roll I FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 001-018 Name SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J Deed 06572-1301 09/24/91 801 cd SD 2 Use 10290 CV 81030 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census 81]] 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site PTN LOT C AS PER ALTERED MAP OF TRACT 228 S-CD FROM 338'103-14-00-3 L/S 13 B/TP 30 TR/RG 2? Acres CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 15,132 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pers/Prop Exemptffons N E T A S S E S S E D V A L'U E 15,132 VALUES CHANGED 01/30/81 ******************************************************************************* * *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL_ TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF8 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number' 405 101 01 00 0 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB ( :332-152-10-00-? Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - SPLIT SOURCE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS BARREL & JODY TR 801 cd 8625'1 SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 86156 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site 0 FROM 332-150-52-00-5 L/S A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres Deed 06563-1251 08/29/91 S-CD 9. ? 1 CP VALUES *** .Mineral Market Land Imprvmnts Other Imps Pens/Prop 875,295 Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 8?5,295 VALUES CHANGED 06/05/86 *** 'NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX 'INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 152 10 00 ? File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA, MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-152-12-00-3 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS BARREL & JODY TR 801 cd 86251 SD 3 %SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 32030 CV 86154 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR FROM 332-150-58-00-3 L/S 1 8/TP TR/RG P3731 Acres Deed 06563-1250 08/29/91 OIL PLO RI OPER 96 S-CD 4.49 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 458,114 Imprvmnts Other Imps 137,080 Pers/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 595,194 VALUES CHANGED 06/03/86 ******************************************************************************* *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** PFI TAX IN'FORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF'4 PARCEL HISTORY PFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PFI/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel .number 332 152 12 00 3 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IH II S1 A3 KB 332-152-39-00-2 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 9:3 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code'05?.-038 Name SPARKS 0ARREL & JOOY TR Deed 06563-1251 08/29/91 801 cd 92308 SD 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 30300 CV 92170'Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 374? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC MR S-CD -FROM 332-152-10-00-7 L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres 4.13 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 379,738 Imprvmnts Other Imps Pens/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E.D V A L U E 379,738 VALUES CHANGED 06/18/92 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY * nfl TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * * nFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PECoSUPPL. EVENT * * PFg/10 NXT/PRE PARCL nfl3 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) nfl? PRINT IN BATCH LATER * * PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED * Er:er parcel number 332 152 39' 00 2 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-152-40-00-4 'Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Ane~ Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS BARREL & JODY TR Deed 06563-1251 08/29/91 801 cd 92308 SD 3 %SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 30'300 CV 92170 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 374? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site EXC' MR S-CO FROM 332-152-10-00-? L/S P A B/TP TR/RG P5907 Acres 4.96 CP *** VALUES *~* Mineral Land Imprvmnts Other Imps Pens/Prop Exemptions Market 456,055 N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 456,055 VALUES CHANGED ' 06/18/92 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY nFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PFg/10 NXT/PRE PARCL nFl3 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) nFl? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parce] number 332 152 40 00 4 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-162-06-00-9 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area (Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS DARREL& JODY TR Deed 06563-1248 08/29/91 801 cd SO 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 36010 CV 81134 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 374? GILMORE AVE Coord 8A:KERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Si,'.. 3741 GILMORE AVE ~ BAKERSFIELD S-CD L/S P 14 B/Tn &15 TR/RG C~h-,LF Acres 1.00 CP ~arke~ !0~,3 ;t 17'1,075 (' NET A S S E SF' "._. .V A L U E 277,386 VALUES CHANGED 05/14/81 * *~* NO SUPPLENENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** ~: PF] TAX ~'NFORMAT~ON PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * PFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. ZNFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT *- PFg/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(ZF ANY) PFI? PRINT ZN BATCH LATER * PF23/24 PRINT NO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 332 162 06 00 9 Fffle - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MN KS IM II S1 A3 KB 332-162-06-00-9 Rol'l 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATLIS -ACTIVE Area Code 05?-038 Name SPARKS BARREL & JODY TR 801 cd SO 3 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY ,J TRS Use 36010 CV 81134 Not¢ 3?4? GILMORE AVE :<TX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bil'l 3?4? GILMORE AVE Cooed BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning Site 374t GILMORE AVE .L/S P 14 B/TP &15 TR/RG CVRLF Acres Deed 06563-1248 08/29/91 BAKERSFIEL0 S-CD t.O0 CP VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 106,311 Imprvmnts Other Imps 171,075 Pets/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 277,386 VALUES CHANGED 05/14/81 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY PFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF13 SHOW REDMP(IF ANY) PFI? PRINT IN BATCH LATER PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED ******************************************************************************* Entep parcel number 332 162 06 00 9 File - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IN II SI 'A3 KB 355-094-07-00-3 Roll 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 001-049 Name SPARKS BARREL & JODY TR 801 cd SD 4 ~SPARKS DARRELL L & MARY J TRS Use 01010 CV 81030 Notf 3?4? GILMORE AVE KTX BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census Bill 3?4? GILMORE AVE Coord BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zonfing Brite 6000 LANDFAIR DR FROM 340-124-07-00-3 L/S ? B/TP TR/RG Deed 06563-1249 08//29/91 BAKERSFIELD S-CD 3622 Acres CP VALUES *** Mffnera~ Land Market 13,587 Imprvmnts Other Imps 96,223 Pets/Prop Exemptions H 7,000 N E T A S S E S S E D V A L U E 102,810 VAUUES CHANGED 01/30/81 ******************************************************************************* *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * PF5/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPU. EVENT * PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH ******************************************************************************* Enter parcel number 355 094 07 00 3 F~]e - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS -IN II S1 A3 KB / 366-3~t-06-00-2 Ro~] 1 FILE BEING PREPARED 93 STATUS - ACTIVE Area Code 099-017 Name SPARKS DARRELL L JR & ANGELA M Deed 05998-~?73 04/29/8? 801~ cd 90254 SD 3 LIse 01060 CV 88167 Notf 5233 TAMARA ST KTX 05626296500 BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Census 8ill 5233 TAMARA ST Coomd BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 Zoning' Site 5233 TAMARA ST BAKERSF[EL0 S-CD FROM 366-020-33-00-9 L/S 6 B/TP TR/RG 4014 Acmes CP' VALUES *** Mineral Land Market 33,121 Imprvmnts Other Imps 93,846 Pers/Prop Exemptions N E T A S S E S S E O V A L U E 126,967 VALUES CHANGED 06/15/88 *** NO SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS TO DISPLAY *** * PF1 TAX INFORMATION PF3 CHANGE ROLL TYPE PF4 PARCEL HISTORY * PFS/8 NXT/PRE SUPPL PF6 SUPPL. INFO PF? PEC.SUPPL. EVENT * PF9/10 NXT/PRE PARCL PF23/24 PRINT WO/W FEED PFI? PRINT LATER IN BATCH ******************************************************************************* Enter parceq number 366 311 06 00 2 Fiqe - P EVENT- 24-22 SA MW KS IM II S1 A3 K8 KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATION RECORD - HHMP OWNER/OPERATOR: DARREL SPARKS DBA: I-GO VAN AND STORAGE ADDRESS: ADDRESS OF VIOLATION: 2800 STANDARD ST, BAKERSFIELD CA, 93308 APN: 332-152-12-00-3 CT: 5 INSPECTOR: GP,~Y WORK ORDER NUMBER: 50509 TRACKING NUMBER: 3785 CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF INVESTIGATION FILE NAME: I-GO VAN & STORAGE DATE TIME NARRATIVE (HR) 11/05/92 1,0 SITE INSPECTION MADE. UIC LOCATED~ AT EAST END OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE REPA',IR BAY. THE WASH RACK LINE TERMINATES AT THE SOUTH END OF THE BUILDING AND DISCHARGES INTO A CLARIFIER. THERE ARE THREE METAL PLATES WELDED TOGETHER THAT COVER THE CLARIFIER, AN iEMPLOYEE OF BAKERSFIELD - LA MOTOR EXPRESS ISTATED THAT WASTE OIL IS ROUTINELY DISCHARGED INTO THE "WASTE OIL TANK" AND POINTED TOWA'RD THE METAL PLATES, 11/12/92 1,3. RETURNED TO SITE, BAKERSFIELD MOTOR EXPRESS EMPLOYEES REMOVED THE METAL PLATE COVER. THERE IS A THREE STAGE CLARIFIER, THE']hAST CHAMBER APPEARS TO BE A DRYWELL TYPE OF C~'DNSTRUCTION. PERFORMED PROPERTY SEARCH. 11/20/92 WROTE DRAFT OF INITIAL NOTICE. 12/01/92 MAILED ABOVE NOTICE. 12/07/92. NOTICE CAME BACK, FORWARDING ORDER EXPIRED, RETURN TO SENDER. CALLED BAKERSFIELD - LA MOTOR EXPRESS, THEY SAID THAT ~':PARK$ STILL PICKED UP MAIL AT THE SITE. REMAILED NOTICE REGULAR MAIL. IT WAS NOT RETURNED.. 12/15/92 ,2 UPDATED FILE, CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF INVESTIGATION FILE NAME: I-GO VAN & STORAGE (HR) 02/23/95 1,0 PREPARE & LABEL PHOTOS FOR FILE. RESEARCHED FINDING A~TERNATE ADDRESS FOR SPARKS. CALLED DTSC TO SEE IF THEY HAD AN ADDRESS FOR SPARKS. THEY ONLY HAD THE ADDRESS FOR GILMORE AVE. 03/05/93 1,0 LYDIA YON SYDOW, KCEHSD, CONDUCTED SEARCH AT RECORDS DEPT, TQ DETERMINE ADDRESS FOR SPARKS. UNSUCCESSFUL. 03/18/93 ,5 PREPARED DRAFT NOTICE OF 2ND NOTICE. 03/23/93 MAILED 2ND NOTICE NOTED ABOVE, 04/29/93 REFERRED CASE TO US-EPA FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. 10/14/93 ,5 i0/18/9) DRAFTED LETTER TO EPA REGARDING USE OF UIC BY J & J TRUCK WASH, MAILED ABOVE LETTER TO EPA, 10/28/93 RECEIVED COPY OF LETTER TO DTSC AND RWOCB INVITING THEM TO INITIATE ENFORCEMENT PRIOR TO EPA ENFORCEMENT, 12/14/93 WENT TO SITE WITH RUBEN MEDINA (DTSC), HE CONDUCTED A GENERATOR INSPECTION AND 'WILL CONTINUE TO HANDLE THE UIC CASE ALSO, CHECK FOR ADDITIONAL INFO ON HARD DISK o 10. 11' 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST BEGIN UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST COMPLETE COMPLAINT FORM WHITE COPY TO FILE ROOM ASSIGN.A TRACKING NUMBER (LIST ON COMPLAINT FORM) ASSEMBLE CASE FILE FOLDER (IF NECESSARY) RESEARCH PROPERTY RECORD FOR OWNERSHIP (IF NEEDED) ATTACH APN MAP TO FILE (IF NEEDED) COMPLETE WORK ORDER LOG SHEET ( 1 PER EACH RESPONSIBLE PARTY) cOMpLETE SHALLOW INJECTION WELL CHECKLIST & UIC PROGRAM FORM PROP 65 REPORT (IF NEEDED) DRAFT NOTIFICATION LETTER(S) (REVIEWED BY JOE CA'AS) NOTIFICATION LETTER(S) SECOND NOTICE (IF NECESSARY) HEARING NOTICE (IF NECESSARY) PAGE 1 ( INITIALS ) [~ FILE [..~ FILE [~] ACCOUNTING EPA DISK [~] FILE HARD FILE RWQCB [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] JANET OWNER OPERATOR [~]FILE RWQCB CC'S OWNER OPERATOR FILE [ ] OWNER [~OPERATOR FILE REFERRAL TO E.P.A. (IF NECESSARY) WITNESS INITIAL SAMPLING REVIEW ANALYSIS [ ] [ ] UIC PAPERWORK CHECKLIST 16(a), RECOMMEND CLOSURE WITHOUT SITE CHARACTERIZATION 16(a)(1), REQUEST DETAILS AND DOCUMENTATION FOR CLOSURE OF UIC 16(a)(2), ISSUE CLOSURE LETTER FOR SITES WITHOUT CHARACTERIZATION 16(a)(3), COMPLETE WORK ORDER CLOSURE FORM 16(a)(4), PUT ABATE DATE AND ABATEMENT ACTION IN COMPUTER FILE 16(a)(5), LOG FILE INTO FACILITIES FILES 16(a)(6), TAKE FILE TO FILE ROOM 16(b) RECOMMEND ADDITIONAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION 16(b)(1) 17, 18. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, [ ] 24, 25, 26, [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] EPA [ ] RWQCB PAGE 2 (INITIALS) [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] ACCOUNTING [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] INPUT DATA TO REFLECT CASE [ ] REASSIGNMENT MAIL LETTER REQUESTING SITE CHARACTERIZATION REVIEW & APPROVAL OF WORKPLAN [ ] SITE CHARACTERIZATION & FIELDWORK [ ] REVIEW.SITE CHARACTERIZATION [ ] REPORT REMEDIATION (IF NECESSARY) CLOSURE LETTER ISSUE WORK ORDER CLOSURE SHEET [ ] [ ] PUT ABATE DATE AND ABATEMENT ACTION INTO COMPUTER FILE LOG FILE INTO FACILITIES FILES [ ] TAKE COMPLETED FILE TO FILE ROOM [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] FILE [ ] [ ] ACCOUNTING [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]