HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION (9) ' WORI<PLAN
.... 'SPARKS-ESTATE ~PROPERTy;'.
Prepared for:
RETAIL INVESTORS, INC,
4450 California Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakerfield, California 93309
Prepared by:
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
2151 Michelson Ddve, Suite 100
Irvine, Califomia 92612
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................ 1
3 WORKPLAN ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Components ................................................................................................................. 2
3.2.1 Secondary Containment ...................................................................................... 2
3.2.2 Phase Separated Oil ........................................................................................... 2
3.2.3 Phase Separated Water ............................................................................ ~ ......... 2
3.2.4 Sludge Solidification .......................... ;... .................... ~ .......................................... 3
3.2.5 Tank Demolition .................................................................................................. 4
4 HEALTH AND SAFETY ...................................................................................................... 4
5 ENDANGERED SPECIES ............................................................ : .................. i ................. 4
FIGURE
1
2
3
4
TITLE
LIST OF FIGURES
Site Location
Site Plan
Tank Layering and Volumes
Oil and Water Decanting Process Flow Diagram
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TiT.,LE
A
B
C
Water Sampling and Analysis Plan
Sludge Sampling and Analysis Plan
Health and Safety Plan
I INTRODUCTION
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants has been retained by Retail investors, Inc. to characterize,
remove the contents of, and demolish a 2.1 million gallon storage tank (Tank 50001) located
at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California (Figure 1). A plot plan showing the
location of the tank and proposed tank cleaning equipment is provided in Figure 2. As
requested by the California Environmental Protection Agency Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC), Kennedy/Jenks Consultants has completed characterization of
the contents of Tank 50001. This work indicates that the tank contents are non-hazardous
and consist of oil, water, and sludge in layers as shown in Figure 3. The intent of this
characterization was to develop options for removing and disposing of the tank contents so
that the tank may be demolished. The purpose of this Workplan is to describe the
recommended means for management and disposal of the tank contents followed by
demolition of the tank.
2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work includes the following:
· Oil
- Decanting phase separated oil to temporary storage tanks.
- Sampling and analysis of the oil to vedfy thatit meets the recycling facility
acceptance cdteria '(to be executed by the tank cleaning contractor).
- Transporting the oil to the recycling facility.
· Water
- Decanting phase separated water to temporary storage tanks.
· ...:.~- .-;;.~. ;: .:,:~.._.~, '~:.
- Sampling and analysis of the water in accordance with the Water Sampling ind" ·
Analysis Plan (Appendix A) to verify that it meets the City of Bakersfield -'~--- ~-~-..~
discharge criteria. .;..~..
- Discharge of the decanted water to the City of Bakersfield Rosedale seWer main.
Sludge "~':~' :'~ ;:;. '!'".'-..' :: ."'
.' .. ..~: ?;:.....' .." :_...~ :.
- Solidification of the sludge layer.
- Sampling, analysis, and disposal of any oil or water that separates during the
sludge solidification process as described above.
Sampling and analysis of the solidified sludge to verify that it meets the
acceptance criteria for the disposal facility in accordance with the Sludge
Sampling and Analysis Plan (Appendix B).
Transporting the solids to the appropriate disposal facility.
3 WORKPLAN
3.1 Objectives
The objective of this Workplan is to define procedures to remove the tank contents, clean
the inside walls, and demolish the tank.
3.2 Components
The following elements comprise the Workplan:
· construction of secondar7 containment to mitigate potential oil and water releases;
· decanting and recycling of phase separated oil;
· decanting and disposal of phase separated water;
· solidification and disposal of sludge and any residual oil or water.
· demolition of the tank
3.2.1 Secondary Containment
Secondary containment berms will be constructed around the temporary storage tanks as
shown in. Figure 2. The secondary containment berms will be constructed so as to prevent
process fluids from running offsite in the event of a spill. The berm will be constructed of ....
portable concrete freeway barriers. The area inside the secondary containment will be'lih~d .' "-
with visqueen or equivalent to provide a liquid barrier. The visqueen will be wrapped -°vel"i.~:~
the top of the concrete barriers and pinned beneath the outside edge of the barrier. Sa~d ½::~;~[~}i';;-'-'
- ~., -..:, .~.?~:~ .- :: '. .
· bags will be placed around the sewer system manhole to prevent discharged water [rom ~,~:-.~-~.. ~c-:..
flowing onto adjacent properties. . ,.:c~?~., :,.;.'_. ~'i:~ .:'.'.
' ' "7,:: Y-": '~7, '::~.~ ·
Discharge piping will be hydro-tested for leaks prior to being used the first time. The -.-.:.:?:?:.~::-
discharge line will be visually inspected once dudng each discharge pedod. If leaks are ii?::??!-:~t?~
observed, discharge will be discontinued until the leak is repaired and hydro-tested. "'?': ";':"'~"':"
· ,'..7:.'~; '-"~"- .".:' . '"
'..-" ": ::
· 3.2.2 Phase Separated Oil , ~.~.:*":-..;,~, i.-**
The top layer of the tank contains approximately 100,000 gallons of free floating oil. A 2 or'
3 inch diameter hot tap will be installed in the side wall of the tank at the oil-water interface
to decant the phase separated oil from Tank 50001 into tanker trucks for transportation to
an appropriate recycling facility as shown in Figure 4. The oil will be sampled and analyzed
by the tank cleaning contractor as required by the recycling facility to ensure that it meets
the facility acceptance criteria,
Oil may also be generated as part of the sludge solidification operation. This oil will be
managed in the same manner as the free floating oil decanted from the tank.
3.2.3 Phase Separated Water
A 2 or 3 inch diameter hot tap will be installed in the side wall of the tank at the water-sludge
interface to decant the phase separated water from Tank 50001 into four batches of five
temporary holding tanks as shown in Figure 4. Preliminary estimates indicate that
approximately 400.000 gallons of water for disposal will be generated during the water
decanting operation. A small additional amount of water may be generated during sludge
solidification operations. This estimate is based upon the estimated 7.5 feet of water phase
currently in tank.
Actual water volumes will vary somewhat during field operations. It is anticipated that the
peak water discharge rate will be approximately 150 gallons per minute, the capacity of the
lift station located immediately downstream of the proposed sewer discharge point. The
average discharge rate is expected to be substantially less. The total water discharge will
take place over a period of approximately 30 to 40 days; however, approximately 90 percent
of the water will be discharged in the first 5 days.
Kennedy/Jenks is currently negotiating for managing this water by arranging for a one time
discharge to the City of Bakersfield (City) Sewer Main located in Rosedale Highway. The
discharge will be accomplished through installation of a permanent sewer connection to the
Rosedale Highway main in the near term to support the eventual planned land use of the
parcel that can also be used for the one time discharge of the water from the tank.
In order to accomplish the proposed discharge, City authorization and permits will need to
be obtained. City permission will be contingent upon water quality analysis (constituent
loadings) on a per-batch basis. Sampling and analysis of water discharged to the City
sewer system will be in accordance with the Water Sampling and Analysis Plan included as
Appendix A. Water discharge will take place at night between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and
7:00 a.m. to avoid peak sewer discharge pedods as requested by the City. -
It is anticipated that any water generated from the sludge solidification process will be ./;.'
similar in composition to the water decanted from the tank with the exception of higher total
suspended solids (TSS) at approximately 500 to 2500 Parts per million. Acceptable limi~;¢i,i.-.:%,
for all constituents will be negotiated with the City and tank cleaning contractor before t~i~!(' ?'~,:~.
cleaning operations are initiated. . ' i';'.?':'ii:!!;.,-7_;:ii!~:.;.
3.2.4 Sludge Solidification -';': ::i~';!:~;-".?;:'''''.
Once the phase separated oil and water have been removed, the sludge layer will be
solidified with clean fill. An excavator with an hydraulic shear attachment will be utilized tO:'.:. ":..
cold cut a window in the tank above the sludge layer. The window will be of sufficient size'
to allow easy access into the tank and to facilitate air flow through the tank. A second
window may be required to provide oxygen levels sufficient to allow tank entry without
supplied air.
Tank 50001 contains approximately four feet ofioose sludge that may be suitable for
pumping directly into vacuum trucks for transportation to an approved disposal facility. The
loose sludge will be solidified at the disposal facility by mixing with clean fill obtained from
disposal facility.
The bottom four feet of sludge will be solidified inside Tank 50001 utilizing clean fill obtained
from the local area, Loaders will be used to solidify the sludge and Icad it into end-dump
trucks. The end-dump truck beds will be lined with plastic sheeting prior to loading. The
sludge material will be transported to an appropriate disposal facility after solidification.
Prior to disposal, the first batch of solidified material will be sampled and analyzed to
confirm that the solidified sludge meets the disposal facility acceptance criteria in
accordance with the Sludge Sampling and Analysis Plan included as Appendix B.
3.2.5 Tank Demolition
Once the oil, water, and sludge have been removed, the tank will be cleaned. Following
final cleaning, the tank will be demolished. A excavator equipped with hydraulic shears will
be utilized to cut down the tank. The steel will be cut to a size appropriate for loading onto
trucks for transportation to a local metal recycling facility.
The concrete ring wall beneath the perimeter of the tank will then be broken up with a loader
or excavator equipped with a pneumatic hammer. The concrete will be broken into
appropriately sized pieces, loaded onto a truck, and transported to a concrete recycling
facility, the dng wall excavation will be backfilled with clean soils to bring it back to the
surrounding grade to prevent ponding of stormwater.
4
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Health and safety conce.ms are addressed in the Kennedy/Jenks Health and Safety Plan
(HSP) for this project included as Appendix C. The HSP will be amended as needed for
changes in field conditions such as equipment changes, confined space entry by
Kennedy/Jenks personnel, changes in chemical hazards, and changes in other physical
hazards. All Kennedy/Jenks field personnel will be given copies of the HSP and any
addendums.
Subcontractor specific HSPs will be obtained from each subcontractor. In add!tion, each
subcontractor will be required to provide documentation of appropriate training and
certificates for ali field personnel. ..
5 ENDANGERED SPECIES
Kern County is home to a variety of endangered species of plants and animals including'.
Blunt Nose Leopard Lizard (genus, species), Tipton Kangaroo Rat (genus, species), [some .
Other Kangaroo Rat (genus, species)], Mojave Ground Squirrel (genus, species), San .:-.?.i:~:.....'-- · ....
Joaquin Kit Fox (genus, species), Hoovers Woolystar (genus, species) and [another w6~i.'i!.'' '':, 'i: ':':'
(genus, species)]. KennedylJenks will investigate the proposed work areas to ensure that
potential endangered species habitat areas are not disturbed.
FIGURES
~YeJ[.-' ' - .......... ~ .........
o
o
o ~°
o ~15''''',
.o'
Tank,~
ISITE ~ o
" ·
o
, · ·., Milo
oo
· ;Dr
SOURCE: OILDALE, CALIFORNIA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, USGS
SECTION 23; T29S; R27E
N
SCALE: 1' - 2000'
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retail Investors, Inc.
Kern County, Califomia
Site Location MaP
K/J 972313.00
October 1997
Figure 1
B C 0 E F O
I
I
!
I
I
I
!
ROSEDALE HIGHWA
(S~ATE ROUTE
!
I
I
!
- ~ .
8C,A~.ES o~s~,~ R~-rAIL ,WESTORS Figure 2 ~;' c-oo{'
~.~. R~
o, " ~ ~ SITE P~
o~ 2~ ~ '
, ~,, .... ~ 28~ Sta~rd Sffee~ S~ RED~ELOPMENT WATER DECANT SYSTEM
A H.A ~ 2/~/98 CC.O. ~ ~ ~ K~/~S ~ts TANK 50001 1
40'
95'
Oil
Water
Oily Sedimen~
Oily Sludge
MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF TANK:
4'- 8'
8' ~15.5'
15.5' - 17.5'
Total
Oily Sludge
Oily Sediment
Water'
Oil
210,000 Gallo~s
210,000 Gallons
400.000 Gallons
100,000 Gallons
920;000' Gallons
I~tg'97Tg?2313.00V'ql~r~ I
Kenned¥/Jenks Consultants
Sparks Estate Property
Kern County, California
Tank 50001 Contents Layers
K/J 972313.00
November 1997
Figure 3
WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS P~
. . -'.... ?;..~ :'~ . .~.~****:~;.%.:,..~
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY .... '~ "~* :':*""~*'~'~:~':'*':
· .....~...:... :- -~: ,-~;~:;.,,; -.
50.000 BARREL TANK ;""*'-' ~*~'s~'~"-, "*"."
CONTENT REMOVAL AND DEMOLITIO~i' i .:: 5.~-*-'!!~;'/:''/'.
12 March 1998
K/J 972313.00.
Prepared for:
RETAIL INVESTORS, INC.
4450 California Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakerfield, California 93309
Prepared by:
KENNEDYIJENKS CONSULTANTS
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2 WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................................... 1
2.1 Decanted Water ........................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Water Dedved from Sludge Solidification and Cleaning Operations ............................. 2
3
SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALYTES ............... 2
3.1 Water Obtained by Decanting Operations .................................................................... 3
3.2 Water Obtained from Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations ......................... 3
4 RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES ................................... 3
4.1 Water Obtained From Decanting Operations ............................................................... 3
4.2 Water Obtained From Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations .................... ;...4 ..
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES ....................................................................................... ;.~'!~..'4
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY .................................... ; .........................
6.1 Sample Management ............................................................................. J..";...~..,..;;J:;'.;5":'.'"i:;?!"
6.1.1 Field Log Book ............ ~ .............................................................................
6.1.2 Field Sample Log .................................................. ' ............
6.1.3 Sample Labels and Seals .................................................................... ;.;;;;.;.;;..'..~5 .: !;.,.::'. ;:..
6.2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AND CUSTODY ................ ~ ................ " , .... ;;~,.::~;:':.-~.~-:.~;6'"'~"'~'~-~: ??:?-- .~'.'
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL ................................................................................ ; ....
6.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS .........................
... -.-.:. ?.:- ~- - ;~:~...;!¥~.~..'-
7 LABORATORY REPORT .................................................................................
A'I-I'ACHMENTS
1
2
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS '~'~ ;"
TITLE
Sample Analysis Request sheet
Water Sample Collection Table
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES
1
TITLE
Tank 50001 Water Management Diagram
Typical 500 BBL Portable Water Storage Tank
Discharge Manhole Detail
INTRODUCTION
This Water Management, Sampling and Analysis Plan (WMSAP) has been prepared to
guide discharge operations for water generated from the decanting and cleaning of a
storage tank (Tank 50001) located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California. The
tank contains approximately 420,000 gallons of free-phase water, and it is anticipated that
additional amounts of water will be generated for discharge from tank sludge solidification
operations and from tank cleaning operations. The purpose of this WMSAP is to specify
means for removing water from the tank and associated activities and to provide protocols
to determine if the water meets the City of Bakersfield's (City) criteria for disposal of this
water into the City wastewater treatment system.
2
WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following sections describe planned field operating procedures for transferring water
from the Tank 50001 to portable storage tanks for analysis and eventual discharge to the
City sewer after approval of analytical results by the City,
2.1 Decanted Water ...:..
"Decanted water" refers to the approximately 420,000 gallons of water contained in Tank':~:"
50001 between the upper oil layer and lower sludge layer. After floating oil has been
decanted to the maximum practicable extent, this water will be removed via pump or gra_v!_tY.
piping tapped into the tank shell to any of five 500-barrel (bbl) "Baker'-type portable water ...........
storage tanks located at grade adjacent to Tank 50001.. Figure 1 presents the proposed
arrangement. Two thousand five hundred (2,500) bbl (105,000 gallons) of water will be"
decanted at one time to these tanks. Care will be exercised in tap or pump suction
placement during decanting so as not to remove fluids at the oil/water or water/sludge .
interfaces .... .::-_...
After completion of decanting to the portable storage tanks, each portable storage tank will
be allowed to rest undisturbed for a minimum of one hour. The portable storage tank
inspection port will then be opened and the tank will be inspected for a visible oil layer. If'
floating oil is observed, a pump will be used to remove the oil to either Tank 50001 or
another portable tank dedicated solely to decanted oil storage. The portable storage tank
will again be allowed to rest undisturbed for one hour and the process repeated until no ~-'.;:i-;:'.i':'-:
visible oil is observed. If an oil sheen is observed, this will be noted on the portable tank
inspection sheet and decanting will be performed so that 4 inches of water (and the oil
sheen) is left in the tank during final discharge.
The portable storage tank bottom will also be probed for sludge accumulation. If sludge has
accumulated to within 4 inches below the water discharge nozzle (located a minimum of 12
to 15 inches above tank bottom; see Figure 2), a vacuum truck will be called out to remove
accumulated sludge either back to Tank 50001 or to a dedicated portable sludge holding
tank for later processing. The portable storage tank will again be allowed to rest
undisturbed for a minimum of one hour and the process repeated until accumulated sludge
is within 4 inches below the water discharge nozzle.
Results of the oil and sludge visual inspection will be documented on a record sheet, which
will include portable storage tank number, batch number, date, time, and signature of
person conducting the inspection.
s.'Ve~ai~xx~q~an~'w~'~a~.doc 1
INTRODUCTION
This Water Management. Sampling and Analysis Plan (WMSAP) has been prepared to
guide discharge operations for water generated from the decanting and cleaning of a
storage tank (Tank 50001) located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California. The
tank contains approximately 420,000 gallons of free-phase water, and it is anticipated that
additional amounts of water will be generated for discharge from tank sludge solidification
operations and from tank cleaning operations. The purpose of this WMSAP is to specify
means for removing water from the tank and associated activities and to provide protocols
to determirfe if the water meets the City of Bakersfield's (City) criteda for disposal of this
water into the City wastewater treatment system.
2 WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following sections describe planned field operating procedures for transferring water
from the Tank 50001 to portable storage tanks for analysis and eventual discharge to the
City sewer after approval of analytical results by the City.
2.1 Decanted Water
"Decanted water" r. efers to the.approximately 420,000 gallons of water contained in Tank
50001 between the upper oil layer and lower sludge layer. After floating oil has been
decanted to. the maximum practicable extent, this water will be removed via pump or g .ravi_'.ty
piping tapped into the tank shell to any of five 500-barrel (bbl) 'Baker'-type portable wate[
storage tanks located at grade adjacent to Tank 50001. Figure I presents the proposed, .'
arrangement. Two thousand five hundred (2,500) bbl (105,000 gallons) of water will be ....
decanted at one time to these tanks. Care will be exercised in'tap or pump suction ..:.-..;,.< . ·
placement during decanting so as not to remove fluids at the oil/water or water/sludge
interfaces. ..- '~'-
After completion of decanting to the portable storage tanks, each portable storage tank will"
be allowed to rest undisturbed for a minimum of one hour. The portable storage tank '
inspection port will then be opened and the tank will be inspected for a visible oil layer, If
floating oil is observed, a pump will be used to remove the oil to either Tank 50001 or
another portable tank dedicated solely to decanted oil storage. The portable storage tank ?..~,~.,*_~ !.:;.i-.' ',.
will again be allowed to rest undisturbed for one hour and the process repeated until no ..... ~.,...
visible oil is observed. If an oil sheen is observed, this will be noted on the portable tank .~. ·
inspection sheet and decanting will be performed So that 4 inches of water (and the oil
sheen) is left in the tank during final discharge.
The portable storage tank bottom will also be probed for sludge accumulation. If sludge has
accumulated to within 4 inches below the water discharge noZzle (located a minimum of 12
to 15 inches above tank bottom; see Figure 2), a vacuum truck will be called out to remove
accumulated sludge either back to Tank 50001 or to a dedicated portable sludge holding
tank for later processing. The portable storage tank will again be allowed to rest
undisturbed for a minimum of one hour and the process repeated until, accumulated sludge
is within 4 inches below the water discharge noZzle.
Results of the oil and sludge visual inspection will be documented on a record sheet, which
will include portable storage tank number, batch number, date, time, and signature of
)erson conducting the inspection.
After oil and sludge inspection shows satisfactory condition, the five portable storage tanks
will be sampled as described in Sections 3 through 7 below. Once preliminary sample
results have been obtained from the laboratory for discharge critical parameters (explained
below), the Kennedy/Jenks field supervisor will review laboratory results against the
negotiated discharge limitations set by the City. If the water is compliant with requirements,
the laboratory results along with the five portable storage tank inspection records will be
faxed to the City for release approval. Due to the constraints of limited tankage, laboratory
turnaround times, and the need to discharge water only at night, we request that the City
review results and issue discharge approval by 5:00 p.m. the same day provided that
laboratory results are faxed by 1:00 p.m. If the water is non-compliant with City discharge
requirements, the affected tank contents will be treated using chemical, heat, or physical
means to meet discharge requirements and the portable storage tank will be resampled.
After City approval for discharge has been received, discharge operations will begin the
same night during the City-specified off-peak operating pedod (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.). All
discharge tanks will be blocked off from receiving decant water from Tank 50001 dudng the
discharge pedod. An operator will be present during discharge operations. Tanks will
gravity discharged or pumped, as needed, through a 4 to 6 inch surface temporary pipeline
to a sewer connection located adjacent to the intersection of Rosedale Highway and the~i~;~
Hungry Hunter/Days Inn ddveway (Figure 3). The discharge line will be equipped with an'
inline flowmeter and manual control valve so that the operator can maintain flow at or below
City-specified volumetric limits. A high level alarm (warn!ng light) will be installed in the_,~.~¢ .......
manhole to warn operators of an impending manhole overflow. Total discharge to the ·
sewer will be calculated by gauging the tank before and after discharge and recording the' .'
volume on a record sheet along with the date, time, portable storage tank number, batch
number, and signature of the operator. ;;' --'.~'.-'..-
- 'i:. T?. .. ....
The sewer connection manhole used for water discharge will be surrounded by a chain lin'i;[
fence with locking gate to prevent damage or vandalism to the discharge piping and City .
automatic sampling equipment. The fence will also provide a safety barrier to prevent
someone from accidentally falling into the open'manhole. The City will be provided witha :'
key to the gate lock.
2.2 Water Derived from Sludge Solidification and Cleaning Operations
Additional water will be generated during the tank cleaning operation by mechanical
separation dudng sludge solidification and from cleaning of the tank pdor to demolition.
This water will be managed in the same manner as the water generated from decanting
operations, with the exception that the frequency of sampling will be increased as described
in the following sections. The reason for increased sampling is that the mechanically.
separated/tank cleaning water has been in recent contact with oils and sludges and greater
potential exists to pick up trace organic constituents compared with the decanted water
which has settled for several years.
3 SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALY'FES
The sampling objective is to determine whether water contained in the tank and generated
from tank cleaning operations meets the requirements specified by the City for discharge to
the sewer system.
It is proposed that two water sampling protocols be implemented. The first protocol will
apply to decanted water, which is expected to be relatively free of oil and solids. The
second protocol will be for water that is mechanically separated from the solids or generated
by tank cleanin9.
This section describes the rationale used for selecting the analytes for decant and
mechanically separated/tank cleaning water analysis prior to disposal into the City sewer
system.
3.1 Water Obtained by Decanting Operations
Analytes for the decanted water are listed on the sample analysis request sheet in
Attachment 1, Table 1-1. These analytes were selected based on the cdteria established by
City Municipal Code Section 14.12.220 entitled "Prohibited Discharges." Analytical
procedures were selected in accordance with Part 136 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR 136).
3.2 Water Obtained from Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations
Attachment 1, Table 1-2 lists analytes for water derived from sludge solidification and tank ~-~.' '--'-i :' ~':.!-,~-'-"'
cleaning operations. This list contains more analytes than for decant water in order to '"' ':';':
screen for additional constituents which could potentially be solubilized during the
4 RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES , ·
4.1 Water Obtained From Decanting Operations -":,;i-'-/:-. ' -~;:.:-';¢:4...'
- ., .,.~-~: .~
To establish that the decanted water meets City criteria, decanted water will be transfen:~'~l ";" ....
into a series of five podable storage tanks. Figure I shows the proposed arrangement. ' '"'""" "~-:!
Each portable storage tank will contain approximately 21,000 gallons for a total of 105,000
gallons. Three water samples will be collected from the upper, middle, and lower elevationS'"!.-... "
in each of the five tanks (15 samples total) and composited into a single sample for .-: ,,
analysis. The composite sample will be analyzed for the complete set of analytes indicated'.i~: '
in Attachment 1, Sample Analysis Request Sheet for 'Water Obtained From Decanting ::"?i~:i... - '~"
Operations" Table 1-1. If the water meets the City discharge criteria, the City will be giv~.n.!.';'~---: ' '"
the results along with a request to approve the discharge of the water. If the water does nOt '
meet the City's criteria, additional treatment or an alternate disposal option will be selected
for the water.
After the analysis of the composite water sample and discharge of the water from the initial
five portable storage tanks, the process of filling and sampling the five tanks will be
repeated as described in Section 2. Analysis of a reduced number of analytes will be used
for subsequent batches of decanted water until the last batch which will be analyzed in the
same manner as the first batch, A composite sample of water collected from each of the
five tanks will be analyzed for the reduced number of analytes (i.e. pH, BTEX, and Oil and
Grease) on an immediate tumaround at the laboratory. If the laboratory results for these
parameters meet City criteria, the water will be discharged to the sewer following the
protocol outlined in Section 2. BOD, COD, TDS, and TSS for each batch of five tanks will
analyzed on a regular laboratory turnaround schedule to provide data to calculate
)urcharge amounts, but these data will not be provided to the City until after discharge is
complete. This batch process will continue until all the remaining free water is removed
from Tank 50001. Kennedy/Jenks estimates that a total of five batches will be necessary to
remove the free water from Tank 50001.
4.2 Water Obtained From Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations
A mechanical system will be used to solidify sludge and solids in Tank 50001. Any water
generated from the sludge solidification process will be placed into One of the portable water
storage tanks for further processing, discharge, or disposal at an appropriate facility. Once
the initial portable water storage tank containing separated/cleaning water slated for
discharge is full, a representative composite sample made up of three individual samples
from the upper, middle, and lower elevations in the tank will be collected and analyzed in
accordance with the Sample Analysis Request Sheet for "Water From Sludge
Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations." If the water meets the City's criteria, the City will
be given the results along with a request to approve the discharge of the water into their
system. If the water does not meet the City's criteria, additional treatment or an alternate
disposal option will be selected for the water. After the analysis of the separated/cleaning':
water sample and discharge of the water from the initial portable water storage tank, the
process of filling and sampling the portable water storage tank will be repeated as describ~
above. However, a revised sampling and analysis protocol will be used for subsequent .;
tanks of separated/cleaning water. A representative sample of the water collected from the'
tank will be analyzed for pH, BTEX, and Oil and Grease on an immediate turnaround at the'
laboratory. If the laboratory results for these parameters meet City discharge criteria, the ?
water will be discharged to the sewer. BOD, COD, TSS and TDS will be analyzed on a
regular laboratory turnaround schedule to provide data to calculate surcharge amounts, but
these data will not be provided to the City until after discharge is complete. This sampling
and discharge process will continue until all of the remaining solids have been removed
from Tank 50001 and the tank has been cleaned for demolition. Kennedy/Jenks estimate~"
that approximately two 21,000-gallon portable water storage tanks of separated/cleaning :''~
water will be recovered for discharge during the sludge solidification and solids removal
process. ..
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES .... ·
The water samples will be placed in the containers listed in Attachment 2. The sampling :~;:i'
equipment will be decontaminated between each sample by washing with an Alconox or
Liquinox solution to remove all visible residues. If necessary, a solvent such as heptane,
will be used to remove any oily residues on the equipment. An acid wash will be used as
required by 40 CFR 136 sampling protocols for metals samples collected in metal sampling
equipment. The equipment will then be rinsed with tap water and rinsed again with distilled
or deionized water. All spent solvent, wash and rinse water will be collected and properly
managed.
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY
This section describes the sampling management and custody treatment of all water
samples.
6.1 Sample Management
6.1.1 Field Loq Book
Sampling personnel will record general information about each sampling event and specific
information about each sample in a hard bound field log book at the time of sampling.
General sampling information will be recorded in sufficient detail so that such information
can be reconstructed at a later time. Where applicable, the following general sampling
information will be recorded in the field log book:
· Facility name
· Purpose of sampling
· Location at sampling site
· Field contact
· Description of sampling procedures
· Date and time of collection
· Weather and other pertinent conditions at time of sample collection
· Field measurements
· Photos, if any
· Signature' of person responsible for sampling
A sketch will be drawn in the field log book that shows the approximate dimensions be ~tw. een
the portable water storage tanks, fences, and the tank numbers. A sketch of each Portable
water storage tank will also be drawn in the field sampling log indicating each sample
location. - --:
6.1'.2 Field Sam. pi, e, Log ..
A field sample log will also be kept in the field log book as a record of specific sample
information. The following information will be recorded for each sample:
· Sample Number
· Sample Location
· Date
· Time
· Sample Description (water, etc.)
· Monitoring Data (pH, odor, appearance).
This information will be arranged in columns and a separate page will be prepared for each
batch of samples. The field sample log will be prepared as the samples are collected and
before they are transported from the site. The information in the field sample log will then
be used to fill out the chain of custody record. Section 6.2 provides information about
completing the chain of custody record. The field sample log will serve as a checklist to
check the information on the sample labels before sealing the sample cooler and
transporting the samples to the laboratory.
6.1.3 Sample Labels and Seals
Each sample container will be labeled and sealed. Each sample container will be labeled
with the following information at the time of sampling:
· Sample Number
· Sample Date
· Bottle
· Batch Number
· Sample Location
· Project Number
· Time
· Preservatives, if any
· Sample Type
· Handlin9 Precautions
· Analytes
· Laboratory
· Initials of Sampling Personnel
6.2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AND CUSTODY
After labeling, all samples will be placed on ice in a cooler for transportation to the
laboratory. In accordance with 'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846," 3rd edition, USEPA, 1986 (SW-846), a chain-of-
custody record will document sample possession from the time of collection until the
samples are analyzed. The record also serves as a sample inventory and analysis order
form, - .......................
The chain-of-custody record will be completed with a waterproof pen. When possession 'Of.
the samples is transferred from sampling personnel to a courier or to the laboratory, the"
chain-of-custody record will be signed by both parties. The chain-of-custody reCOrd arid' the~?.
sample analysis request sheet (see Section 3.0) will be placed in a large resealable pl.a-*'~
bag inside the cooler. The chain-of-custody record will be Included with the analytical ~!~.'
in an appendix to the final report concerning the management of this water phase. ~' "~-
The sample containers will be delivered to a state-certified, third party laboratory. The ...
laboratory will be notified of the time by which analysis must begin so that the sample
holding times are not exceeded.
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL
The samples will be submitted to a state-certified laboratory for analysis. The laboratory Will
be required to prepare and analyze a duplicate, a duplicate spike, and a blank spike for 10
percent of the samples it receives.
Percent relative differences will be calculated by the laboratory for duplicates and percent
recoveries will be calculated for the duplicate spikes. If the percent relative differences or
percent recoveries fall outside the ranges specified in the methods in SW-846 or the
laboratory's acceptable ranges, the laboratory will investigate the reason for the
discrepancy. The investigation may include checking calculations, verifying analytical
procedures, recalibrating instruments, preparing new reference standards, or reanalyzing
samples.
Since sampling equipment will be decontaminated in the field, equipment blanks will be
collected. After the sampling equipment has been cleaned as described above, samples of
i.~'elml~n~wtr.MIp.doc * 6
the final rinse water will be C~llected and analyzed separately. One equipment blank per
daily sampling event will be collected. The sampling equipment blanks check the
thoroughness of the cleaning procedure and the extent of any cross-contamination between
samples.
6.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
The maximum holding times for the various analytes range from days to several months.
The holding times are the maximum allowable elapsed times from sample collection to
sample analysis. So that the holding times are not exceeded, the laboratory must be
instructed to analyze the samples within allowable hold pedods.
The samples will be prepared and analyzed according to the methods listed in the sample
analysis request sheet, Attachment 1.
7
LABORATORY REPORT
As a minimum, the laboratory report will Indicate the laboratory name, DHS accreditation
number, a statement that it is accredited for the constituents that were analyzed, and the .
accreditation expiration date, sample numbers, and anal)ti.ca! results. The laboratory report
will also include quality control data fdr each sample batch and a description of any
deviations from the published sample preparation or analytical method.
7
FIGURES
POTENTIAL
OIL S~
WATER
SLUDGE
T-50001
(AFTER REMOVAL
OF FLOATING OIL)
REV. 1, Da'le 2/27/98
SEPARATED WATER
FROM SLUDGE
REMOVAL OPERATION
SLUDGE REMOVAL AS
REQUIRED VIA VACUUM
TRUCK (TYP T-1
THROUGH T-5)
SKIMMED
OIL TANK
NECESSARY FOR OIL REMOVAL
FROM T-l-TO T-5)
Not To Scole
OFF SPEC WATER
RETURN TO T-50001
OR OTHER
TEMPORARY STORAGE
TO SEWER
CONNECTION
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retoil Investors
2800 Stond(3rd Street
Bokersfield, Colifornio
T<3nk 50001
Water Manogemenf Diogram
March 1998
K/J 972.315.00
Figure I
WITH BLIND
FLANGE (2.)
UPPER STAIR HANDRAIL ,,
HANORAILS.
FOR TRAVEL
:F'O LO ( NG
sTEPs
RETAINER
80LT ~
HINGE
iL . ~- B" STO PRESSURE
ADOCR (2) VACUUM RELIEF /HINGED'VAPOR--
PROOF DOOR
VALVE &
~tLIFTING LUG
GAGE HATCH .
'7'1.1 I/~~
DOLLY END
6#
GATE
VALVE
GATE VALVE
8 '0"
I 9'0"
"GATE VALVE
(4)
(2)
POTENTIAL WATER
DISCHARGE NOZZLES
.GATE
VALVE
4 # DIA
NIPPLES
.TRACTOR END
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retail Investors
2800 Standard Street
Bakersfield, California
Typical 500 BBL
Portable Water Storage Tank
December lgg7
K/J g725.15.00
Figure 2
FROM TANK .....
TIE STRAP
4" ALUM.PIPE CONC.
BLOCK
IIl,.X
LEVEL INOICATOR
FLOAT
EMERGENCY FLASHER
MOUNT TO FENCE
VICTAULiC COUPLINGS. REMOVE ELBOW
AND DROP PIPE WHEN NOT IN USE
AND REPLACE MANHOLE COVER.
-'-2"x2" L TO SUPPORT
LEVEL INDICATOR
EL. 401:1:
///,,x ///..x
12V BATTERY
- +
i HL
8' PLUGGED
STUB OUT
2'-6" '1'-6"
3/4". PLYWOOD i-i..~.IR: ': ..
FII BOIIO~ TO .MH .~
· ~:.CH ANN EL: BoTTO~i :-',:~-:,~::-;',~.:-::-: .
· . -. :.~:,ic.:?.';-:i .:
TO CITY SEWER :.
INV. EL. 39.3
SAND BAG AS REQUIRED
BRACE WEIR
AS REQUIRED
MANHOLE DETAIL FOR
TEMPORARY TANK DISCHARGE
NOTES: 1. Temporary 6' screened, chain link
fence with locked gate around
manhole.
2. HL float will turn 'on Emergency
Flasher when contact closed by
high water level.
K ennedy/denks Consultants
Retail Investors
2800 Standard Street
Bakersfield, California
Manhole Detail for Temporary
Tank Discharge
March 1998
K/J 972.31.3,00
Figure 3
'ATTACHMENT 1
:. SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST SHEET
.. ~*~. ..
A'r~dMENT 1
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST SHEET
NOTE FOR LABORATORY: The purpose of this Sample Analysis Request Sheet is to specify the sample processing, sample
preparation or extraction, and analytical methods and detection limits'that are requested for the attached samples. The analysts
numbers on the chain of custody record refer to the item numbers listed below.
If there are any questions, please call the-project manager.
SAMPLING SUMMARY
Water samples will be collected from a number of portable water storage tanks. The water is expected to contain suspended solids.
There is one sampling objective: To determine if the water meets the City of Bakersfield's sewer discharge criteria.
II. PROCESSING OF WATE~ SAMPLES
The water samples are expected to contain.,, greater than~0'5%.... :.~*s°lids'· Consequently,.. the samples will probably require filtering.
.... - ,.~. ...... ,~: ~"**"..... , ...... , ..,_,:~..,,~;~;- --,..-!i!ii?!,I:.; ,*i ...... ..
'. .* :.:~ ;.*~2,: ;. ' '
,
SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
TABLE 1-1
WATER OBTAINED FROM DECANTING OPERATIONS "'
ANAL;~q'ES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD "HoLDII~G' DISCHARGE FREQUENCY sAMPLING
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
METHOD LIMIT, mg/L REQUIRED
BEFORE
DISCHARGE?
'1 Metals Analyses (by City of One composite
Arsenic HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0.045 6 months Bakersfield) for first and last Yes
Cadmium HNOs to pH<2 200.7 0.004 6 months batch of five Yes
Chromium HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0.007 6 months tanks Yes
Copper HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0.006 6 months (105,000 gal). · Yes
Lead HNOs to pH<2 200.7 0.042 6 months Yes
Mercury HNO~ to pH<2 245.2 - 28 days
Nickel HNOs to pH<2 200.7 0.015 6 months
Selenium HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.075 6 months
Vanadium HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.008 6 months
Zinc HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0.002 6 months
2 Other Parameters
pH none required 150.1 ASAP (by City of One composite Yes
Total Dissolved Solids Cool, 4°C 160.3 7 days Bakersfield) sample for Yes
Total Suspended Solids Cool, 4°C 160.2 7 days each batch of Yes
Oil and Grease~ Adjust to pH<2 413.1 28 days five tanks Yes
BOD Cool, 4°C 405.1 48 hours (105,000 gal). No
COD Cool, 4eC 410.1 28 days No
Ammonia (as N) 350.2
LEL -.
Flashpoint
3 BTEX Cool, 4eC, '602 14 days (by City of 'One composite Yes
Benzene 0.008% 0.0002 Bakersfield) sample for
Toluene Na2S203 0.00,02 each batch of
Ethylene Benzene 0.0002 five tanks
Xylene -: (i05,000 gal).
2
F{~ LE 1-1
WATER OBTAINED M DECANTING OPERATIONS
ANALY'r~s SAMPLE' ANALYTICAL METHOD HOLDING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY SAM~L'ING
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
METHOD LIMIT, mg/L REQUIRED
BEFORE
DISCHARGE? .
4 Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4°C, add 376.1 '7 days ('by CitY of One composite Yes
Zn(C-zH30~z + Bakersfield) sample for
NaOH to pH>9 each batch of
five tanks
(105,000 gal).
Note 1: One of these methods will be selected at the option of the City of Bakersfield
!.
T E 1-2)N
-~1 WATER OBTAINED FROM SLUDGE SOLI]~IrcATION AND TANK CLEANING OPERATIONS
ANALYTES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD HOLDING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY SAMPLING RESULTS
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS REQUIRED BEFORE
METHOD , LIMIT, m~/I.. DISCHARGE?
I Metals Analyses (by City of One composite
Arsenic HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.045 6 months Bakersfield) sample for each Yes
Cadmium HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0.004 6 months tank Yes
Chromium HNO$ to pH<2 200.7 0.007 6 months (21,000 gal). · Yes
Copper HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.006 6 months Yes
Lead HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.042 6 months Yes
Memury HNO3 to pH<2 245.2 - 28 days Yes
Nickel HNOs to pH<2 200.7 0.015 6 months Yes
Selenium HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.075 6 months Yes
Vanadium HNO~ to pH<2 200.7 0,008 6 months Yes
Zinc , ,HNOa to pH<2 200.7 0.002 6 months
2 Other parameters
pH none required 150.1 - ASAP (by City of One composite Yes
Total Dissolved Solids Cool, 4°C 160.3 - 7 days Bakersfield) sample for each Yes
Total Suspended Solids Cool, 4°C 160.2 - 7 days tank Yes
Oil and Grease~ to pH<2 413.1 - 28 days (21,000 gal). Yes
BOD Cool, 4eC 405.1 - 28 days No
COD Cool, 4~C 410.1 - 28 days No
Ammonia (as N) 350.2 - 28 days
LEL - -
Flashpoint - -
3 BTEX C°°l, 4oC, 602 14 days (by City of One composite Yes
Benzene 0.008% 0.0002 Bakersfield) sample for each
Toluene Na2S20~ 0.0002 tank
Ethylene Benzene 0.0002 (21,000 gal).
Xylene -
4 Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4°C, add' '376.1 - ASAP (by City of One composite' Yes
Zn(C=H30~ + Bakersfield) sample for each
NaOH to pH>9 tank
(21,000 c. lal).
Refefence$:"l'est Methods fa' EvalueUng Solids Wasie~. Physk~il/Ctmmlcal Methods'. SW-845. third edition, U.S. Environmental Pmtaclio~ Agency. 1988.'Melhods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wasles',
EPA 600/4,.79-020, U.S. Envimamental ProteclJ(m Agency.
Title 22. California Code of RegulatJoas. Set,on e~261. ~ II and XJ.
Note 1: One oftheae methocl~wlllbe~elected attheoplkmofth~Cl~ofBakamlbld.
ATTACHMENT
-,'...'-.' WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION TABLE -
A'I-rACHMENT 2
WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION TABLE
ANALY'TES PRESERVATION CONTAINER HOLDING TIME SAMPLE
METHOD METHOD
Metals Analyses Cool, 4° C, HNO3 to 250 mi plastic bottle 6 months 200.7
pH<2 .
BTEX Coo1"4°C, 0.008% 2 40 mi VOA vials 14 days 602
NazS203, w/teflon septum caps
HCI to pH 2
pH Cool. 4°,C 120 mi plastic bottle' ASAP 150.1
Oil & Grease, pH < 2 1 L glass bottle for each - 413.1
BODICOD Cool, 4eC test - 405.1/410
TDS Cool, 4'C - 160.1
TSS Cool, 4~C - 160.2
Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4=C .
Zn (C2H3Oz) +
NaOH to pH > 9
APPENDIX B
SLUDGE SAMPLING AND ANAL,..YSIS PLAN
SLUDGE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY ~'
50,000 BARREL TANK
CONTENT REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION
12 March 1998
K/J 972313.00
Prepared for:.
RETAIL INVESTORS, INC.
4450 California Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakerfield, California 93309
Prepared by:
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................ 1
3 SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALY'I'ES ............... 1
4 RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES ................................... 1
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES ...................................................................... : ....................... 2
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY ....................................................................... 2
6,1 Sample Management ................................................................................................... 2
6.1.1 Field Log Book ........................................... ; ......................................... ' ...... ~' ........ 2
6.1.2 Field Sample Log ................................................................................................ 3
6.1.3 Sample Labels and Seals ................................................................... ' ................. 3
6.2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AND CUSTODY ......... ; .... ; ............... ~ ........ ;; ................. 4
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL ................................................................................ ; ............. ' ..... 4
6.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS ................................................................. 4
7 LABORATORY REPORT .............................................................................. .;.'.;~ .... ~ .... ~ .... 5
A'I-rACHMENTS
1
2
TITLE
Sample Analysis Request Sheet
Sludge Sample Collection Table
1 INTRODUCTION
This Sludge Management, Sampling and Analysis Plan (SMSAP) has been prepared to
guide disposal operations for solids generated from the cleaning of sludge from a storage
tank (Tank 50001) located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California. The tank
contains approximately 420,000 gallons of sludge consisting of a mixture of solids, oil and
water. It is anticipated that approximately 1,500 cubic yards of solidified sludge material will
be generated from solidification of the sludge during tank cleaning operations. The purpose
of this SMSAP is to specify means for removing solidified sludge from the tank and
associated activities and to provide protocols to determine if the residual solids meet the
disposal facility's acceptance criteria.
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following sections descdbe planned field operating procedures for transferring solidified
sludge from the tank to end-dump trucks and sampling for analysis and eventual disposal at
an approved non-hazardous landfill after providing analytical results to the disposal facility.
After floating oil and water has been decanted, the sludge layer will be solidified by mixing
with clean fill dirt. An excavator with an hydraulic shear attachment will be utilized to cold
cut a window in the tank above the sludge layer. The window will be of sufficient size to
allow easy access into the tank and to facilitate air flow through the tank. A second window
may be required to provide oxygen levels sufficient to allow tank entry without supplied air.
Tank 50001 contains approximately four f(~et of loose sludge that may be suitable for
pumping directly into vacuum trucks for transportation to an approved disposal facility or
may be solidified in-situ.
The bottom fobr feet of sludge will be solidified inside Tank 50001 ~tilizing clean fill obtained
from the local area. Loaders will be used to solidify the sludge and load it into end-dump
trucks. The end-dump truck beds will be lined with plastic sheeting prior to loading. The
sludge material will be transported to an appropriate disposal facility after solidification.
The solidified sludge material will be transported to the selected disposal facility and placed.
in designated areas pending confirmation sample results.
3 SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALYTES
The sampling objective is to determine whether solidified sludge generated from tank
cleaning operations meets the acceptance requirements specified by the disposal facility.
This section describes the rationale used for selecting the analytes for residual solids
analysis prior to shipment to the disposal facility.
Analytes for the residUal solids are listed on the sample analysis request sheet in
Attachment 1, Table 1-1. These analytes were selected based on the criteria established by
Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.
RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES
A mechanical system will be used to mix sludge and solids with clean fill to solidify them
prior to removal from Tank 50001. To establish that the residual solids meet the disposal
facility criteria, a single sample of solidified sludge matedal collected from the tank will be
analyzed for the complete set af analytes indicated in Attachment 1, Sample Analysis
Request Sheet for "Solids Obtained From Sludge Solidification Operations" Table 1-1. If the
residual solids meet the disposal facility acceptance criteria, the disposal facility will be
given a copy of the results along with a bill of lading or manifest, as appropriate, for each
end-dump truck.
In addition to the analytical results above, it is anticipated that the following information will
be supplied to the diSposal facility prior to transporting the solidified sludge ofsite:
· Completed Matedal Profile form
· Completed Non-RCRA Notification/Certification form
· Representative sample of solidified sludge matedal
· Copy of the Waste Classification Information report including copies of all analytical
data
Immediately pdor to disposal, a representative sample of the solidified sludge matedal will
be evaluated by the disposal facility. While the disposal facility may dictate specific
predisposal criteria, it is anticipated that the following criteria will be used to evaluate the
material immediately pdor to placement:
· Confirm non-hazardous pH
· Reativity screen (sulfide and cyanide)
· Visual examination for free liquids and other debris
· Test for water absorption capacity
Once the material has been screened, the disposal facility will arrange for final placement
and disposal of the material. If the residual solids do not meet the disposal facility criteria,
additional treatment or an alternate disposal option will be selected for the solids.
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The sludge samples will be placed in the containers listed in Attachment 2. The sampling
equipment will be decontaminated between each sample by washing with an AlconOx'0~
Liquinox solution to remove all visible residues. If necessary, a solvent such as hePtan;~¥~,ill
be utilized to remove any oily residues on the equipment. The equipment will then be rJri~"-ed.
with tap water and dnsed again with distilled or deionized water. All spent solvent, waS'l~
and rinse water will be collected and properly managed. ' "~'~'
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY
This section describes the sampling management and custody treatment of all sludge
samples collected by Kennedy/Jenks.
6.1 Sample Management
6,1.1 Field Log Book
Sampling personnel will record general information about each sampling event and specific
information about each sample in a hard bound field log book at the time of sampling:
General sampling information will be recorded in sufficient detail so that such information
can be reconstructed at a later time. Where applicable, the following general sampling
information will be recorded in the field log book:
2
· Facility name
· Purpose of sampling
· Location at sampling site
· Field contact
· Description of sampling procedures
· Date and time of collection
· Weather and other pedinent conditions at time of sample collection
· Field measurements
· 'Photos, if any
· Signature of person responsible for sampling
A sketch will be drawn in the field log book that shows the truck number and indicating each
sample location.
.6,1,2 Field Sample Log
A field sample log will also be kept in the field log book as a record of specific sample
information. The following information will be recorded for each sample:
· Sample Number "
· Sample Location
· Date
· Time
· Sample Description (sludge, etc.)
· Monitoring Data (odor, appearance, etc.)
This information will be arranged in columns and a separate page will be prepared for eadh
batch of samples. The field sample log will be prepared as the samples are collected ~nd
before they are transported from the site. The Information in the field sample log will then
be used to fill out the chain of custody record. Section 6.2 provides Information about ~."'
completing the chain of custody record. The field sample log will serve as a checklist to"
check the information on the sample labels before sealingthe sample cooler and
transporting the samples to the laboratory.
6,'!.3 Sample Label~ and Seals
Each sample container will be labeled and sealed. Each sample container will be labeled
with the following information at the time of sampling:
· Sample Number
· Sample Date
· Bottle or Jar
· Batch Number
· Sample Location
· Project Number
· Time
· Preservatives, if any
· Sample Type
· Handling Precautions '
Analytes
Laboratory
Initials of Sampling Personnel
6.2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AND CUSTODY
After labeling, all samples will be placed on ice in a cooler for transportation to the
laboratory. In accordance with "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846," 3rd edition, USEPA, 1986 (SW-846), a chain-of-
custody record will document sample possession from the time of collection until the
samples are analyzed. The record also serves as a sample inventory and analysis order
form.
The chain-of-custody record will be completed with a waterproof pen. When possession of
the samples is transferred from sampling personnel to a couder or to the laboratory, the.
chain-of-custody record will be signed by both parties. The chain-of-custody record and
sample analysis request sheet (see Section 3.0) will be placed in a large resealable pla~fi~"'..i.i. ~.:..:
bag inside the cooler. The chain-of-custody record will be included with the analytical daf~
in an appendix to the final report concerning the management of this water phase. · i;.:~ ~..;~.._.'.. :'~.' :.
The sample containers will be delivered to a state-certified, third party laboratory. The '"' '-
laboratory will be notified of the time by which analysis must begin so that the sample
holding times are not exceeded. .........
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL
The samples will be submitted to a state-certified laboratory for analysis. The laboratorY'~ii'
be required to prepare and analyze a duplicate, a duplicate spike, and a blank spike for 10';
percent of the samples it receives.
Percent relative differences wi~ be calculated by the laboratory for duplicates and percent
recoveries will be calculated for the duplicate spikes. If the percent relative differences or
percent recoveries fall outside the ranges specified in the methods in SW-846 or the
laboratory's acceptable ranges, the laboratory will investigate the reason for the
discrepancy. The investigation may include checking calculations, vedfylng analytical
procedures, recalibrating instruments, preparing new reference standards, or reanalyzing
samples.
Since sampling equipment will be decontaminated in the field, equipment blanks will be
collected. After the sampling equipment has been cleaned as described above, samples of
the final rinse water will be collected and analyzed separately. One equipment blank per
daily sampling event will be collected. The sampling equipment blanks check the
thoroughness of the cleaning procedure and the extent of any cross-contamination between
samples.
6.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
The maximum holding times for the various analytes range from days to several months.
The holding times are the maximum allowable elapsed times from sample collection to
sample analysis. So that the holding times are not exceeded, the laboratory must be
instructed to analyze the samples within allowable hold periods.
The samples will be prepared and analyzed according to the methods listed in the sample
analysis request sheet, Attachment 1.
7 LABORATORY REPORT
As a minimum, the laboratory report will indicate the laboratory name, DHS accreditation
number, a statement that it is accredited for the constituents that were analyzed, and the
accreditation expiration date, sample numbers, and analytical results. The laboratory report
will also include quality control data for each sample batch and a description of any
deviations from the published sample preparation or analytical method.
5
ATTACHMENT 1
SAMPLE ANALYSIS .REQUEST SHEET
-IMENT 1
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST SHEET
NOTE FOR LABORATORY: The purpose of this Sample Analysis ,Request Sheet is to specify the sample processing, sample preparation or
extraction, and analytical methods and detection limits that are requested for the attached samples. The analysis numbers on the chain of custody
record refer to the item numbers listed below.
If there are any questions, please call the project manager.
SAMPLING SUMMARY
Solid samples will be collected from a number of Roll offs. There is one sampling objective: 1) To determine if the solids can be characterized as
non hazardous wastes.
II. PROCESSING,,OF SOLID SAMPLES
The solid samples will need to undergo extracti°n for tile WET and:TCLp.
· ..'~.~!. ~,;
II1o
.E PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
.... ~,NALYTES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD HOLDING ' DIsP(~SAL FREQUENCY SAMPLING
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME CRITERIA OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
METHOD LIMIT, mg/L LIMITS REQUIRED
BEFORE
DISPOSAL
WET Metals (17 metals) 3050 6 months Pdor to shipment Yes
Antimony 6010 0.3 of the first load of
Arsenic 7060 0.1 material offsite.
Barium ~" 6010 1
Berylium 6010 0,1
Cadmium 6010 0,1
Chromium 6010 0,1
Cobalt 6010 0.1
Copper 6010 .' 0.1
Lead 7420 1
Molybdenum 6010 0.1
Nickel 6010 0.5
Selenium 7740 0,1
Silver 6010 0.1
Thallium 7841 0.5
Vanadium 6010 0.1
Zinc 6010 0.1
TCLP 8240B 8240 0,005 (~ 14 days 'P~ior to shiPment 'Y~s
Benzene of the first load of
material offsite.
(1) Method Detection Limit mg/kg
References:
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solids Wastes, Physical/Chemiml Methods ', SW-846, third edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986.
Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Section 66261, ~Appendices,ll.and XI.
· .; .',...~.,,¥~.h~. '..,,',~ ~ ' ": ,". ~"~.';:
"' ;'~ ' ~i~ '" ; ' "' '
:' '~".,',i"i'.~?i~' .,,'=' ~i'. .... ,';-::~[
ATTACHMENT 2
SAMPEE COLLECTION TABLE
a. SOLID SAMPLES
Collect solid samples from the top of the end-dump truck.
ANALYTES SAMPLE" PRESER~/ATION ' CONTAINER HOLDING
PREPARATION/ ' METHOD TIME
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
WET Metals 3050 Cool, 4° C 25~ ~1 glass bottle 6 months
TCLP 1311/8020 Cool, 4° C 125 mi glass bottle 14 days
Benzene
,'APPENDIX .C
'. HEALTH AND
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
50,000 BARREL TANK
2800 Standard Street
Bakersfield, CA 93308
I February 1998
K/J 972313.00
Prepared for.
Retail Investors, In.c.
4450 Califomia Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Prepared by:
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
200 New Stine Road, Suite 115
Bakersfield, CA 93309
TABLE OJ= CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN SUMMARY ........................................................................... iii
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1..
2 KEY HEALTH AND SAFETY PERSONNEL ....................................................................... 3
3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY ................................................................................ ..4
4 PLANNED SITE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 5.
5 HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK EVALUATION ..................................................................... 6
5.1 Potential Physical Hazards ........................................................................................ ~.
5.1.1 Confined Space Entry .... ..-:., ...... '..';..;...;..; ..... : ..................................... : ................. ~.
5.1.2 Heat Stress ............................. ~ ......................................................................... 6.
5.1.3 Fall Protection ................................................................................................... 6.
-5.1.4 Heavy Equipment ............................ , ................................................................. 7.. -
5.2 Potential Chemical Hazards ...................................................................................... .7.
5.2.1 Tank Fluid Samples ..... ,'. ................................................................................... 3'.. ~
5.3 Biohazards ........................................ ; ....................................................................... .7..
. :,~ .'.....~ . - . ~, ~... '
6 COMMUNITY HAZARD ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 9. :'~'
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
Personnel Protective Equipment .............................................................................. 10' '':.,.~..~'!''''I''/-.i~-;-~..
Work Zones ............................................................................................................. .1D..~, ~,-;~:,':;~ i: '
Monitoring ............................................................................................................. ,..1D*...?!~?,.~.i
7.3.1 Hazardous Substances ................................................................................... 'J.0 '~:!~;.??-
7.3.2 Noise ...................................... ' ............................................ ............................ .t.1 ':" ::"~;
7.3.3 Action Levels .............................. ; .................................................................... .1:1
Site Control .............................................................................................................. 1.1
Decontamination ...................................................................................................... ~S
Training ................................................................................................................... .1.1
Medical Monitoring ................................................................................................... .12
Sanitation ................................................................................................................ .12
8 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ........................ ; ........................................................... 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
TABLE
1
2
3
4
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE
Chemicals Detected in Tank Fluid Samples
Chemical Allowable Exposure Val.ues and Exposure Symptoms
Measures for Level C Decontamination
Emergency Information
FIGURE TITLE
I site Location Map
2 Route to Hospital
LIST OF FIGURES
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN SUMMARY
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
Sparks Estate Property
50,000 Barrel Tank
2800 Standard Street, Bakersfield, CA
SITE TELEPHONE:
INVESTIGATION DATE:
805-208-3795 (Mobile)
805-338-2676 (Mobile)
I February 1998 (Estimated Start Date)
K/J JOB NUMBER:
972313.00
SITE SAFETY OFFICER (SSO): Todd Rook
'PROdEC¥ MANAGER:
'Craig Dial
TYPE OF INVESTIGATION*
Sampling Investigation: [] Hand Auger
[] Drilling
[] Trenching
[] Well Installation
[] Site Walk-through
POTENTIAL HAZARDS
[] Organics
[] Inorganics
[] Metals
[] Acids
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
[] Level C
[] Level D
Site Remediation:
[] Excavation
[] Treatment System Installation.
[] UST Removal
Other:. Tank Contents RemOval and Demoliti0~
[] Solvents [] Bases
[] Pesticides [] Fire/Explosion
[] Other: Operating equipment
3
INTRODUCTION
This Site Health and Safety Plan, developed in accordance with Cai-OSHA standards for
hazardous waste operations (8 CCR 5192) establishes general health and safety protocols
for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (Kennedy/Jenks) personnel at the Sparks Estate Property
located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California (Site). As needed, addenda
containing activity-specific health and safety protocols will be prepared and affached to this
Site Health and Safety Plan prior to the initiation of each additional field activity. The Site
Health and Safety Plan and activity-specific addenda, as a minimum, will contain the
following information:
1. Names of key personnel and alternates responsible for site health and safety and
appointment of a Site Safety Officer.
2. A health and safety dsk evaluation for each site task and operation.
3. Personal protective equipment to be used by employees for each site task and
operations being conducted.
4. Medical surveillance requirements.
Frequency and types of air monitoring, personal monitoring and environmental
sampling techniques and instrumentation to be used. Methods of maintenance and '
calibration of monitoring and sampling equipment to be used,
6. Site control measures.
7. Decontamination procedures,
8. Site's standard operating procedures.
o
An Emergency Response Plan which addresses effective site response to
emergencies. As a minimum, the elements of the Emergenqt Response Plan
include the following:
a. Pre-emergency planning
b. Personnel roles, lines of authority training and communication
c. Emergency recognition and prevention
d. Safe distances and places of refuge
e. Site security and control
f. Evacuation routes and procedures
g. Decontamination
h. Emergency medical treatment and first aid
i. Emergency alerting and response procedures
j. Personal protective equipment and em. ergency equipment
k. Procedure for reporting incidents
I. Site map
For informational purposes only, this plan may be provided to subcontractors of
Kennedy/Jenks involved in activities at the Site, interested regulatory agencies, or others.
. However, entities and personnel other than Kennedy/Jenks shall be solely responsible for
their own health and safety and shall independently assess onsite conditions and develop
their own health and safety protocols. Entities or personnel that anticipate using health and
safety measures which are less stringent than Kennedy/Jenks' measures should
immediately contact the Kennedy/Jenks Site Safety Officer (SSO).
Kennedy/Jenks has developed a corporate health and safety program (Kennedy/Jenks
Consultants, Industrial Services Group, Corporate Health and Safety Program, June 1991).
The corporate program complies with current health and safety regulations, including 8 CCR
5192, HaZardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response. Many of the protocols of the
corporate program are conducted on a routine basis (general training, respirator fit testing,
general medical record keeping, etc.) and are not repeated herein. The corporate program is
available to Kennedy/Jenks employees. Questions regarding the corporate program are
referred to the KennedylJenks Regional Safety Supervisor.
A copy of the Site Health and Safety Plan along with any addenda containing activity specific
health and safety inform~tion will be kePt in a conspicuoUs location at all times while work is
being conducted.
2
2
KEY HEALTH AND SAFETY PERSONNEL
The Kennedy/Jenks SSO is Todd Rook. In the absence of the SSO during field activities, a
member of the field investigation team will be designated as the Kennedy/Jenks Field Site
Safety Officer (FSSO). The $SO or FSSO is responsible for the following:
· Daily safety meetings
· Observing field activities for compliance with this Site Health and Safety Plan,
applicable addenda, and Kennedy/Jenks' Corporate Health and Safety Program.
· Maintaining the onsite medical surveillance, if required, and emergency medical
treatment programs, and assisting in onsite emergencies.
Modifying health and safety protocols or terminating field work when unsafe work
conditions exist.
Familiarizing personnel with health and safety protocols.
· Observing that field personnel wear appropriate personal protective equipment.
· Recording data from direct reading instruments and evaluating potential hazards.
· Monitoring decontamination procedures.
· Recording the occurrence o[ any s:~te injury or illness.
If unsafe conditions are encountered, if illness or injury occurs, or if the level of protection
needs to be changed, the SSO or FSSO will consult in a timely manner with the Project
Manager, Craig Dial, or the Corporate Industrial. Hygienist, Bert Drews.
3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
A 50,000 barrel aboveground storage tank was erected at the Site in 1979. The tank is of
steel construction with a fixed roof. The tank was originally owned and operated by the
Sabre Transportation Company. The original use of the tank is not known. Ownership of
the tank and its contents was transferred to Mr. Darrel Sparks in 1985.
Although the tank is labeled 'Hazardous Waste", a sampling investigation conducted by
KennedylJenks indicates that the contents of the tank consist of non-hazardous oil, water,
and sludge/sediment. The sampling investigation indicates that the tank does not contain
constituents of concern in concentrations that exceed hazardous waste cdteria as defined in
22 CCR 66261.24. A summary of the maximum concentrations of constituents of concern
from recent and past sample analysis is presented in Table 1.
Access to the tank location is from Rosedale Highway, across a vacant parcel owned by Mr.
Leonard Seaton. A map of the tank site is provided as Figure 1. ....... .~ -
4
PLANNED SITE ACTIVITIES
The contents of the 50,000 barrel tank will be removed and the tank demolished. Field
activities will include the following:
· Decanting of free floating oil into temporary storage tanks or tanker trucks for
transportation to an oil recycling facility. A 2 or 3 inch diameter hot tap will be
installed to decant the oil to the storage tanks or trucks.
· Decanting of phase separated water to temporary storage tanks for sampling and
analysis pdor to discharge to the City of Bakersfield (City) sewer system. A floating
pump will be utilized to pump the water to the temporary storage tanks. Samples will
be collected from the temporary storage tanks and analyzed for benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, xylene, chemical oxygen demand, biological oxygen demand, CAM 17
metals, total suspended solids, and total dissolved solids. Once the City has
approved the water for discharge, the water will be pumped from the temporary
storage tanks to an existing sewer connection to the Rosedale Main.
· Solidification of the sludge layer will be accomplished by mixing clean fill dirt from a
specified source wi.th the sludge inside the 50,000 barrel tank. The tank cleaning -
contractor will utilize an excavator equipped with a hydraulic shear to cut two 20 foot
by 20 foot access openings in appropriate places in the tank wall. Loaders will be
utilized to solidify the sludge and load it onto trucks for transportation to an approved ....... "-
disposal facility. Representative samples collected from the matedal in the trucks will
be analyzed to confirm that the material meets the disposal facility acceptance -' - .-:'- - -
cdteda. :.i.. ~..,?,.':i'.~" ' '
· The tank cleaning contractor will utilize an excavator equipped with a hydraulic shear .."
to demolish the tank. The inside tank walls and bottom will be cleaned utilizing a' ~;:.~ .
steam cleaner. Wastewater generated from tank cleaning operations will be pumped
into temporary storage tanks and managed in the same way as the decanted water.
Sections of the tank will be cut and loaded onto a truck for transportation to a local --
metal recycling facility.
· An excavator equipped with a pneumatic hammer will be utilized by the tank cleaning
contractor to demolish the concrete dng wall after the tank has been removed. The
concrete will be broken up and loaded on trucks for transportation to a concrete
recycling facility.
· Trucks will enter the work area from an adjacent parcel through a gate on Standard
Street. Trucks will exit the site through a gate located south of the tank to Rosedale
Highway.
5
5
5.1
HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK EVALUATION
Potential Physical Hazards
5.1.1 Confined Space Entry
KennedylJenks personnel will not enter any confined space without advanced specific
preparation, planning, training, and supervision by the Regional Safety Supervisor. A
confined space is defined by OSHA as the concurrent existence of the following conditions:
1. Is large enough and so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform
assigned work; and
2. Has limited or restricted means for entry or exit (for example, tanks, vessels, silos,
storage bins, hoppers, vaults, and pits are spaces that may have limited means of
entry); and
3. Is not designed for continuous employee occupancy.
Subcontractor personnel will not bepermitted to enter a confined space unless they provide :...,_ ~.
a confined space entry program including documentation that they have been given - -
advanced specific preparation, planning, training, and supervision by the subcontractor '. ·
Safety Supervisor. A copy of the subcontractor confined space entry program will be
submitted to Kennedy/Jenks pdor to subcontract personnel entedng any confined space. -
5.1.2 Heat Stress
Adverse climate conditions, primarily heat, are important considerations in planning and
conducting site operations. Maximum daytime temperature may exceed 100 degrees F at '~.' -~ ' '~ '
the site and heat stress is an associated concern. Preventative measures should include the .'~
following:
· Water and/or commercial electrolyte solutions will be available and drinking of these
fluids will be encouraged. The water will be kept reasonably cool.
· Suitable acclimation periods will be provided for workers to gradually establish their..
resistance to heat stress.
Personnel exhibiting symptoms of heat sfress (nausea, cramps, dizziness, clammy skin) will
be removed from the work area, cooled, fluids will be administered, and the personnel will be
observed. Personnel exhibiting symptoms of heat stroke (hot dry skin, mental confusion,
unconsciousness) will be immediately cooled and taken to the hospital.
5.1.3 Fall Protection
Kennedy/Jenks personnel will conduct work activities at ground level or within areas
protected by guard rails such as the stairway or platform at the top of the 50,000 barrel
tank.
5.'1.4 Heavy Equipment
Field personnel should be cognizant of potential physical hazards with use of heavy
equipment and electrical equipment during field operations. Appropriate precautions include
the following:
1. ANSI-approved hard-hats, safety glasses or goggles, and steel-toe boots will be
worn.
2. Loose clothing that may catch in moving parts will not be worn.
3. Hearing protection will be wom if a preliminary or past experience indicates that
maximum noise levels will exceed 85 decibels at any time during field activities.
4. Personnel will stay a safe distance (50 feet minimum) from operating heavy
equipment.
5.2 Potential Chemical Hazards
Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes, petroleum hydrocarbons, and heavy metals
(BTEX, TPH, and metals) have been detected in tank fluid samples collected at the site.
Field personnel could potentially be exposed to BTEX, TPH and metals and their assOciated --
constituents at the site by direct contact with fluids from the tank through inhalation
containing organic chemicals, or through inhalation of organic chemical vapors. Field
personnel will minimize potential chemical hazards by (1) avoiding' direct contact with tank. .......
fluids, (2) performing air monitoring to determine necessary level of personal protective
equipment and (3) avoiding generation of dust. Dudng sample transfer activities, ._
Kennedy/Jenks personnel will stand up wind of the samples at all times. Ingestion of
particulate matter containing chemicals is another general exposure route. However, for the .'
site personnel, the potential for this type of exposure is minimal. Safe work practices, ..--
including restriction of eating, drinking, or smoking to certain times and places will be ',..' ...... · ....
enforced at the worksite. "
5.2.1 Tank Fluid Samples - -~' .... '~
Chemicals detected in the tank fluids from the site and the highest detected concentration~ '::.. ~:-':-;"i:'
Available Threshold Limit Values (TLV) or Permissible Exposure Limits (PEL) published for
the chemicals detected in the tank fluids are listed in Table 2.
5.3 Biohazards
The following biohazards are associated with this project:
· Poisonous snakes/Rabid animals
· Ticks, mosquitoes, and other insects (disease carders or poisonous)
· Spiders of all types, includes Black Widow and Brown Recluse
· Dead animal carcasses
· Hantavirus
O:'~lggTT.972"J 13.0(~J~v2.0oc: 7
The following safety directives shall be followed to minimize the potential of exposure to
biohazards:
· Avoid contact with rodents, rodent burrows and rodent feces.
· Avoid contact with snakes, animals, etc.
· If bitten or stung by any of the animals/insects/reptiles, etc., stay calm. Try to identify
the specific animal, etc. Seek first aid treatment.
· Maintain respiratory protection for hantavirus.
e~ct°cMs~i~3-cx~.-~zdoc~ * 8
6 COMMUNITY HAZARD ANALYSIS
Generally, insignificant particulate and vapor emissions are generated during routine tank
cleaning and sampling activities. Onsite worker exposure to chemicals at concentrations of
concern is not expected. Potential exposures to the surrounding community will likely be
much less than potential onsite worker exposure, and is therefore also not expected to be of
concern.
.-7
9
7 PROTECTIVE ACTIONS
7.1 Personnel Protective Equipment
Field personnel will wear equipment to protect against the potential physical and chemical
hazards which have been identified herein and those that become apparent in the field.
Modified Level D protection will be required at a minimum for field activities at the site.
Modified Level D personal protective equipment to be used will include:
· ANSI-approved hard hat
· Chemical resistant gloves; inner glove - disposable PVC and outer glove -
NBRJNitrile will be worn during sample collection activities
Boots, steel toe and shank
Tyvek suit will be worn during sampling activities
ANSI-approved safety glasses with splash guards or a face shield should be used
since a foreseeable splash hazard exists
Additional equipment will be readily available to upgrade to modified Level C protection, if
necessary. This equipment includes:
· Full-face or half-face air purifying respirator with high efficiency particulate/organic
vapor cartddges "'
The level of protection employed may be upgraded, as deemed necessary by the SSO or
FSSO.
If non-routine field activities are initiated, the level of protection Will be specified in the '
activity-specific health and safety addenda.
7.2 Work Zones ::~..-~:.~: ....-
" '.,:.. ¥:~' ~i.:-:;:.:'
In general, Kennedy/Jenks personnel will stay a minimum of fifty feet from operating heaVy ....
equipment. Heavy equipment will not be approached during loading, shearing, or oth~i'i':;i~!'!i:-i:
activities where there is significant potential for injury due to operation of the heavy ' '~':;:.""
equipment. '~:~:?; ...."'
Work zones including designation of an Exclusion Zone, a contamination Reduction Zone,
and a Support Zone will be established for any field activity which requires Level C
protection or greater. Work zones will be clearly marked in the field. Work zones may vary
depending on the proposed field activity and will be established in the activity-specific health
and safetY addenda.
7.3 Monitoring
7.3.1 Hazardous Substances
During sample transfer activities; field personnel will perform air monitoring with a direct
reading organic vapor analyzer (OVA, OVM or HNU) in the breathing zone. All readings
10
shall be ~'ecorded in field logs. All direct reading instruments shall be calibrated according to
the manufacturer's specifications.
If OVA readings consistently exceed 5 parts per million (ppm) above background then
Level C protection will be required if work is to continue. If OVA readings exceed 10 ppm in
the breathing zone while workers are in Level C protection, then work will cease and the
source of the emission will be controlled before work continues.
7.3.2 Noise
Field personnel will initially monitor noise levels associated with equipment and machinery
with a direct reading portable noise level monitor unless based on experience, it is known
that hearing protection is not necessary. Readings will be taken within the normal worker
hearing zone. If maximum noise levels exceed 85 decibels at any time during site
operations, headng protection will be worn.
7.3.3 Action Levels
If OVA readings for a particular work area consistently exceed 5 parts per. million (ppm) . ..
above background, then sampling and tank cleaning work will cease and personnel will "~"," ·
withdraw from the work area. If concentrations persist above 5 ppm, then Level C protectiOn.
will be required if work is to continue. If OVA readings exceed 10 ppm in the breathing
while workers are in Level C protection, then work will cease and the source of the emission ' :' ' '
will be investigated before work continues. ;~ --...~.":~":-' ..
7.4 Site Control '* ' .....
Work zones will not bo established for modified Level D activities, Individuals not directly -
involved in ongoing work will be requested to stay at least 50 feet away from Level D ....:-.;~
activities. ..; -?:....?_. ~ ;~;~.;~;,.......
For activities requiring modified Level D protection and modified Level C protection without ·~-~-~..
established work zones, it i~ unlik~l~ that malor decontamination wifl t~ necessary. ^t th i: i'i i:-
conclusion of each day, disposable gloves and coveralls will be removed and disposed of in ' '
onsite containers.
If full Level C protection is required, minimum decontamination procedures associated with
Level C protection will be followed and established within the decontamination Reduction
Zone. These procedures are presented in Table 3.
7.6 Training
Kennedy/Jenks and subcontractor personnel participating in field activities will have
completed the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response 40-hour health and
safety training course (8 CCR 5192) or have equivalent training. Training requirements are
discussed in Kennedy/Jenks' Corporate Health and Safety program. Prior to each day of
g:'~loca~l ggT~g72313.(~_rm~,2.,doc <
11
work, a meeting will be held at the site to familiarize personnel with health and safety issues,
protective equipment, emergency information and supplies, and to discuss special topics.
7.7 Medical Monitoring
Kennedy/Jenks personnel participating in field activities will be included in a medical
monitoring program. The program includes a baseline physical examination, pulmonary
function test, and blood and urine tests. Annual follow-up examinations are included. Details
of the medical program are included in Kennedy/Jenks' Corporate Health and Safety
Program.
7.8 Sanitation
The site has no facilities for drinking water, washing water, or restroom facilities available.
Altemative restroom fa .cilitie. s are available at nearby strip centers. Drinking water and
washing water will be provided with water.brought by Site personnel. No eating, drinking,
smoking, or gum chewing is allowed in restricted areas.
12
8
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
Hazard recognition is an essential part of the Emergency Response Plan. Initiation of the
contingency plan relies on the employee's ability to recognize an emergency or potential for
an emergency. The following is a list of events which Will immediately initiate emergency
procedures:
· Explosion
· Fire
· Release of organic vapors or particulate above the action levels
· Personal injury
· Failure or expected failure of runon/runoff control measures
· Natural occurrences, i.e., lightning, tornado, high winds, etc.
Emergency communications will consist of four methods:
Verbal Communication ....
Verbal communication will be the primary method of emergency communication between'
onsite personnel, distance permitting. ? - ::..".
Hand Signals '.-: ............. '-= :-*:--:-
·
· Hands on throat indicates inability to breathe.
· Thumbs up indicates OK:
· Thumbs down indicates not OK. ': -
Hands clasped on wrists will indicate personnel to stop work and exit Exclusion Zone.' .. "
Air Horn/Vehicle Horn .
Air horns will be carded by personnel entering any established Exclusion Zone and stationed
in the Support Zone. If air horns fail or are lost, vehicle horns may be used as a substitute:...
Air horns will be the primary alarm system and used in the following manner:. '-~
One long blast: Evacuate Exclusion Zone by nearest exit. Proceed to assembly -
area.
Two short blasts:
Localized problem. Avoid area, move to decontamination Reduction
Zone for further instruction.
Three short blasts: All clear, resume work.
Telephones
Telephones are used for routine communication and to notify offsite agencies of incidents
and request assistance. Emergency telephone numbers are given in Table 4.
When an event recognized as an emergency occurs, the alarm system will be used to notify
personnel. As soon as the alarm system is activated, the SSO or FSSO wil~ be notified.
The SSO 'or FSSO will take into account the following information:
· Nature of emergency
· Wind direction
· Location of personnel
· Monitoring results
· Emergency equipment available
· Offsite population
Based on this information, the SSO or FSSO will direct appropriate emergency action and
agency notification. After the emergency has been controlled and the site is considered safe
to re-enter, the SSO or FSSO will direct remedial action to restore the site to full operating
condition.
The SSO or FSSO will investigate the nature and cause of the incident so that work
procedures can be modified to minimize the likelihood of the incident's recurrence. All
incidents must be reported in a timely, appropriate manner. An incident is any unplanned
event resulting in injury, damage, loss of assets, adverse publicity, or which requires
notification of a regulatory agency, regardless of severity. All Kennedy/Jenks personnel
should report an incident to the SSO. or FSSO. The SSO and FSSO will report to the project
manager. Each incident will be investigated and a written report should be received by the
project manager and the regional safety supervisor within five days of the incident.
If work zones are established, the Exclusion Zone will have several emergency exits which
will allow safe egress in multiple directions from any point onsite. The exit selection will be
based on the emergency location, type of emergency, and wind direction. Upon hearing the
evacuation signal or otherwise being notified of an evacuation, employees will immediately
travel to the assembly area located at the decontamination station.
Employees will follow a route that avoids locations downwind from the emergency. If
emergency exits are used, employees will proceed to the assembly area by the quickest
route possible, staying close to the perimeter of the Exclusion Zone. VVhen the asSembly
area is reached, employees will immediately check in with the SSO or FSSO. The site will
remain evacuated until the all clear signal has been given.
Onsite emergency equipment will include equipment used dudng operations (heavy
equipment) and reserved items stored at the decontamination/assembly area and at
strategic areas onsite. The following is a list of emergency equipment available:
· Portable emergency eyewash
· First-aid supplies
All personnel will have a thorough understanding of the Emergency Response Plan before
starting work. It will be rehearsed regularly and reviewed periodically to keep it current with
new or changing site conditions or information.
In the event of personal injury, first-aid personnel must decide if the victim's injuries are
potentially the type that would be aggravated by movement. If there is any doubt, or the
victim is unconscious and cannot respond, no attempt should be made to move the victim to
the decontamination area. Only offsite paramedics may move such victims. If the
14
paramedics approve, the victim's protective equipment will be cut off in the decontamination
Reduction Zone. If the decision is made not to remove the victim's protective clothing, he or
she will be wrapped in a tarp or similar object to protect the ambulance and crew during
transportation. If the victim is contaminated with materials that threaten to cause additional
injury or immediate health hazards, the personal protective equipment shall be carefully
removed and the victim washed appropriately. Routine and emergency communication will
be provided by the site telephone.
SIGNATURES
Site Safety ~)fficer:.
Regional Safety Supervisor:
Project Manager:.
Date:
i~'"'~ Date:
~ ? Date:
~"~$9G'TTg72313,h..fwv2.~
15
TABLE 1
CHEMICALS DETECTED IN TANK'FLUID SAMPLES
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
K/J 972313.00
Page I of 1
Benzene 33 Tank Sludge
Toluene 520 Tank Fluid Surface
Ethyl Benzene 370 Tank Fluid Surface
Total Xylenes 1,900 Tank Fluid Surface
Arsenic 3.4 Tank Sludge
Barium .; 420 Tank Sludge
Cadmium 5.2 Tank Sludge
Chromium 130 Tank Sludge".~
Cobalt 7.6 Tank Sludge"'., +i,
Copper 190 Tank Sludge'
Lead 200 Tank Sludge
Mercury 0,73 Tank SlUdge
Molybdenum 10 Tank Sludge -
Nickel 46 Tank Sludge.
Vanadium '- 57 Tank Sludge
Zinc 1,900 Tank Sludge
2
CHEMICAL ALLOWABLE EXPOSURE VALUES AND EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
K/J 972313.00
Page 1 of 1
· ~i~.2~CHEMICAL.'..~ ':'''. :'- !,.. ,.,.,.'~.33~V'.-.T~NA.' 2:'L '~'~ .... ."_C' ' SUB :*.'.A~? ';!~?'%' "~'~ "RGE~.O ,P, GANS
Benzene 10 ppm 5 ppm 1 ppm Irritant to eyes, nose, Eyes, skin, liver, kidneys, blood,
- .50 ppm/10-rain respiratory system, nausea respiratory system,
max cardiovascular system, central
nervous system
Ethylbenzene 100 ppm 125 ppm , 100 ppm
Irritant to eyes, mucous
membranes, headache,
dermatitis, narcosis coma
Eyes, skin, liver, respiratory
system, central nervous system.
reproductive system
Toluene 100 ppm/10-hr 150 ppm 100 ppm
200 ppm/10-min 300 ppm ceiling
Xylene 100 ppm 150 ppm
100 ppm
Fatigue, weakness, confusion,
euphoria, dizziness, headache,
dilated pupils
Dizziness, excitement, vomiting
Central nervous system, liver,
kidneys, skin, eyes, respiratory
system
Central nervous system, eyes, Gl
tract, blood, liver, kidneys, skin,
respiratory system
Arsenic 0.01 mglkg NE 'NE
Irritant to skin, possible
dermatitis
Skin, respiratory system, kidneys,
central nervous system, liver,
gastrointestinal tract,
reproductive system
Barium 0.5 m~l/kg NE NE
Cadmium 0.01 mglkg NE NE
NE
NE
Pulmonary edema, breathing
difficulty, cough, chest tight,
substernal pain, headache,
chills
Respiratory system, kidneys,
prostate, blood
Chromium 0.5 mglkg NE 0.1 mg/kg Irritant to eyes, sensitization Eyes, skin
dermatitis
Cobalt 0.02 mglkg NE NE Irritant to eyes, skin, mucous Eyes, skin, respiratory system,
membranes, cough, decreased blood, central nervous system
pulmonary fun, ction, wheezing
2
CHEMICAL ALLOWABLE EXPOSURE VALUES AND EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
K/J 972313.00
Page 2 of 1
· ..~.~%;,~'CHEMICAL .... ~,,. '....,~TLV-.I~NA . ~.~; ~ GET ORGA,NS,.'
- ,.?..,:. ',,-~?,,.; ~'~ . . . *....~. %, .~ ~;*-*,, *.,. ,~.~. ,.~; ,* ..~;~- · . · . . ,, . ;~ ~,...~. , :~: . · :;..
Copper 1.0 rog/kg NE NE I~t ~ eye, nose, up~r Eyes, skin, respirato~ system,
.~ respi~ ~stem, me~llic liver, kidneys
~e
Lead 0.05 mglkg NE NE
Mercury 0.01 mg/kg NE NE
Molybdenum 5 mg/kg NE NE
Weakness, exhaustion,
insomnia, facial pallor, irritant to
eyes, h~,pertension
Irritant to eyes, skin, cough,
chest pain, breathing difficulty,
bronchitis pneumonitis, tremor,
insomnia, irritability, indecision,
headache, fati[iue
Irritant to eyes, nose, throat
Eyes, gastrointestinal tract,
central nervous system, kidneys,
blood, gingival tissue
Eyes, skin, respiratory system,
central nervous system, kidneys
Eyes, respiratory system,
kidneys, blood
Nickel I mg/kg NE NE
Vanadium 0.5 rog/kg (15 NE NE
minute)
NE
Nose, respiratory system, skin
Irritant to eyes, skin, throat,
green tongue, metallic taste,
eczema, cough, wheezing,
bronchitis
Eyes, skin, respiratory system
Zinc 5 mg/,kg NE , NE , , , NE . . Eyes, skin, respiratory system
Notm~;
TLV- 11NA · 11u'eshoid Umlt Value * 8 hr. Tlme Weighted Average
STEL · Short Term Exposure Umit ·.
American Cont'erenca o! Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values (TI.V) and Biological Exposure Indices for 1988-1989.
TLV - 'IWA relx31ed tn ~ represents ~ of vapor per million parts o! alt by volume at 25'C and 780 ton'. TI.V. 'TWA repotted In mg/m represents milligrams of substance per cubic meter of air.
PEL · Fe~letal OSHA (29 CFR 1910 Subcart Z) Pemtlsslb~ ExlX~Ure ~ based ~, ~ hour t~me weighted a~lge. U.S, Depaxtm~t of Health and Human ~enctces. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. June 1994.
~ Mam~aE 1985. Handlxx~k of Toxic and Hazan:lous Chemicals and C~ Pa~ Ridge. New ,1~. Noye~
NE,* I~ estat~ished.
TABLE 3
MEASURES FOR LEVEL C DECONTAMINATION
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
K/J 972313.00
Page I of I
Equipment Drop
Deposit equipment used onsite (tools, sampling devices and containers,
monitoring instruments, radios, clipboards, etc.) on plastic drop cloths.
Segregation at the drop reduces the probability of cross contamination.
During hot weather operations, a cool down station may be set up within this
area.
2
Outer Garment, Boots, and Gloves Wash and Rinse
Scrub outer boots, outer gloves and splash suit with decon solution or
detergent water. Rinse off using copious amounts of water. ..
3
4
Outer Boot and Glove Removal
Remove outer boots and gloves. Deposit in container with plastic liner
Canister or Mask Change
If worker leaves Exclusion Zone to change canister (or mask), this is the last
step in the decontamination procedure. Worker's canister is exchanged, new
outer gloves and boot covers donned, joints taped, and worker returns to"
duty.
5
Boot, Gloves and Outer Garment Removal
Boots, chemical-resistant splash suit, inner gloves removed and deposited in
separate containers lined with plastic.
6
Face Piece Removal
Facepiece is removed. Avoid touching face with fingers. Facepiece is
deposited on plastic sheet.
7
Field Wash
Hands and face are thoroughly washed. Shower as soon as possible.
TABLE 4
EMERGENCY INFORMATION
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
K/J 972313.00
Page I of I
In Emergency 911
Site Telephone (805) 208-3795 (Mobile)
(805) 338-2676 (Mobile)
Hospital: Mercy Hospital ADDRESS
Directions to hospital: East on Rosedale Highway to Oak Street. Right (south) on Oak
Street to Truxtun Avenue. Left (east) on Truxtun Avenue. Mercy Hospital is on the right
(south) side of Truxtun Avenue.
Ambulance 911
Police 911
Fire Department 911
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants:
Project Manager
Branch Safety Supervisor
Regional Safety Supervisor
Corporate Industrial Hygi,enist
Craig Dial (714) 261-15~7
Todd Rook (805) 835-9785
Bruce Thomas (714) 261-1577
Bert Drews (503) 295-4911 .... ~
oYYelL."- ...... - ..............
ioAs~
o
o o
o
0 0 0
0 0
· ·
iSITE -*.o
1:
· ·e
I
SOURCE: OILDALE, CALIFORNIA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, USGS
SECTION 23; T29S; R27E
N
SCALE: 1' - 2000'
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retail Investors, Inc.
Kern County, California
Site Location Map
KJJ 972313.00
October 1997
Figure 1
).,1<;
I
I \
¥1N~O;:II lV"'J
~ulllVA 1VBIN]3
~II:I I
I
Public Works Oepartmer';
w~atew~,'et Division
8101 Aahe Road
~er36eld, CaJifornia 9~t 3
(805) 32~3249
APPLICATION F(
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATE
-DISCHARGE PERMI
SECTION A - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Company Name Ret. ail Tnvestors~ Thc.
2. Mailing Address 4450 Calif=ornla Ave., Suite K-303
Bakersfield, California
3. Facil~y Address 2800 Standard Street, Bakersfield,
4. Name of Signing Official J.I. Salas
5. Name of Contact Official Brad ~srbeau
6. Business Activity Real Estate Development
warehousing, painting, printing, meat packing, food processing, etc.).
Standard Industrial Classification Number(s) (SIC Code) for your facilities:.
This facility generates the following types of wastes (check all that apply):
Average ~al/dav
a. [] Domestic wastes
(restrooms, employee showers,otc.)
b. [] Cooling water, non-contact
c. I-I Boiler/Tower blowdown
d. [] Cooling water, contact
are discharged to (check all that apply):
Average ~al/day
i-! Ground water
I-! Evaporation
[] Waste haulers
Provide name and address of waste hauler(s), if used,
Business Lic. No.
Tel. No,(805 ) 323-1996
Zip Code 93309
Zip Code. 93308
Title
Title
Tel. No.[805 ) 323-1996
(auto repair, machine shop, electroplatir
2911
e. [] Process
f. El Equipment/Facility washdown
g. El Air Pollution Control Unit
h. [] Storm water runoff to sewer
i. ~] Other (describe)
Decanted Water
Temp. Disch.
4 Week Total
462,000 9al.
El Sanitary sewer
[] Storm sewer
El Surface water
[] Other (describe)
Averaqe clal/d;
10. Is a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan established for the facility?. [] Yes I~ No
Note to s~qninq official: In accordance with Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 403 Section 403.14, informatA
and data provided in this questionnaire which identifies the nature and frequency of discharge shall be available tO the publ
without restriction. Request~ for confidential treatment of other information shall be governed by procedures specified
40 CFR Part 2. Should a discharge permit be required for your facifibj,, the information in this questionnaire will be used
issue the permit.
This is to be signed by an authorized official of your firm after, adequate completion of this form and review
of the information by the signing official.
I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this
document and attachments. Based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately
responsible for obtaining the information reported herein, I believe that the submitted
information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and/or
imprisonm%nt.
Date Signature of Official
Raw water '-~ource: (public ~:~hty name. priva:a ~¥ell. etc.)
Source Account #
al/si~[.~_~y or ~t~/day
Us.._~e
NOTE: The following information in this section must be completed for each product line.
Principal product produced: N/A, discharge from decant:ed water
6. Raw materials and process additives used:
N/A
Production process'~. ,,~J.[1 be batch at: max/mum 150 gt:at for 8 hours.
Eg Batch r'l Continuous [] Both % batch
Average number of batches per 24-hour day 1
8. Hours of operation: 11 '~a~.tt~'. to 7 ~rm. [] Continuous
9. Is production subject to seasonal variation? [] Yes ~] No
'yes, briefly describe seasonal production cycle.
continuous
10. Are there any process changes or expansions planned during the next three years?
[] Yes Ig No
If yes, attach a separate sheet to this form describing the nature of planned changes or expansions.
11. Schematic Flow Diagram: Instructions see reverse side.
Attach a diagram of the flow pattem of mater~.ls and water from start to completed product, showing all unit processes
generating wastewater. See Figure 1 frcxn HMS~ (A'i~'A~ A)
12. Building Layout:
Attach a drawing or blue print .of the location of each building on the premises. Show the location and sizes of wate~
meters, storm drains, community sewers and each building sewer connected to the community sewers.
See Figure I from WMSAP (ATTA~ A)
s~.c ;'tON C -WASTEWATER INFORMATION
Physical and chemical characteristic.s of wastes discharged (check all that apply):
Flammable' [] Temperature over 150° F
Toxic or poisonous
~ Toxic gases
[] Highly odorous
[] Dissolved Sulfides over 0.1 mg/l See Attachment
[] Waste larger than ¥." in diameter B
[] Cyanides
[] Highly colored
I-1 Radioactive
[] Total dissolved solids above 5000 mg/I
[] Rainwater
[] Dilution water
[] Single pass cooling water
[] Petroleum base soluble cutting oils
[] Petroleum based oils
[] Others (specify) Decanted .water from
oil storage tanks, nonhazardous
2. Waste Composition parameters: Du~ing One Time Discharge
Flow (Avg.) 48,000 gal/day COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) 2110 mg/l
Flow (Peak) 72,000 gal/day BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) 17c~ mg/l
Total Dissolved Solids 1 8,600 mg/I SS (Suspended Solids) 109 mg/I
pH range 8 to 8.3 Oil and Grease mg/l
3. Pretreatment devices or processes used for treating wastewater or sludge (check as many as appropriate):
I-i Air Flotation [] Ion exchange
n
0
[3
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
~]
0
Centrifuge [] Neutralization, pH correction
Chemical Precipitation [] Ozonation
Chlorination [] Reverse Osmosis
Cyclone [] Screen
Filtration [] Sediment
Flow equalization [] Septic Tank
Grease or oil separation, type qravity [] Solvent separation
Grease Trap [] Spill Protection
Grit Removal i-I Sump
Biological treatment, type
Rainwater diversion or storage, type
Other chemical treatment, type
Other physical treatment, type mecha~cal
Other, type
sludge dewat~r~ng: n.i I ~ mm{ ng
0 No pretreatment provtded "
Certification: Are pretreatment standards for your Industry being met on a consistent basis by this facilitY?
[] Yes I'1 No If "yes," go on to Question 6. N/A
If answer to number 4 is "no," will additional pretreatment and/or operations and maintenance be required for this
facility to meet pretreatment standards? [] Yes [] No If "no," explain reason for non-compliance
If "yes," attach a description of the required pretreatment and/or operations and maintenance to gain compliance, and
include schedule of dates for commencement and completion of events leading to the'construction and operation o
this additional pretreatment.
List any other environmental control permits held by this facile:
OTSC letter of no objection to proposed action for this project. See Attachment C.
If any wastewater analyses have been performed on the wastewater discharge(s) from your facilities, attach a copy o
the most recent data to thi~ questionnaire. Be sure to include the date of the analysis, name of laborato~ performing
the analysis, and location(s) from which sample(s) were taken (attach sketches, plans, etc., as necessalT).
lo De ^usam," "suspected to be Present," or "Known to be Present" In y~imanufacturlng or service aciivity or generated as a by-product
CHEMICAL c~ c~ CHEMICAL
L
I1.
IlL
METALS & INORGANICS
An~mony
Nmenlc
Be~/lllum
Cadmium
~c~
~y~
~ck~
8el~
PHENOLS ~O CRE~
Phenol(,)
Phenol. 2-chlmo
Phenol. 2.4-dlchlm'°
Phenol. 2.4.6.blchloto
Phenol. pentachlom
Phenol, 2-nll~o
Phenol. 4.nll~o
Phenol, 2.4-dlnJt~o
Phenol, 2,4~dtme~hyt
m.C~eaol, p.chlom
o-C~e~d. 4,6.dlnltro
MONOCYCUC AROMATICS (EXCLUDING PHENOLS, CRESOLS AND
(PHTHALATES)
B4n~lne, chloto . ~
Benzene. l,~-dlchlo~o
NITROSAMINES AND OTHER NITROGEN-CONTAINING COMPOUNDS
Nitroaamlne, dlmethyl n [] 0 '1~'.
Nllroaamlne. dlphenyl [] 0 0 C;3/
Nltn3aandne. dl-n-propyl 0 C] 0 ~
I~n~dlni,~.S'.dlch~om [] C] 0 L~.
Hyclrazlm. 1,2-dlph.~yl C] C] C] ~
D O O
;AL
CHEMICAL
COMPOUND
(/) ¢/)
VII.
HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS
I~lha~. b~omo-
I~lhane. chlo~o-
Methane, di~o
Me~. c~lbr~
Me~, d~obz~o
M~. ~lb~o
~. ~lc~Mo
E~. I,I-dlc~m~
E~, 1.2~o
E~.
E~. l,l,2-=1~o
E~,
E~m. cN~o
E~, t,t~lc~o
E~. ~!~o
E~. ~N~o
~, 1,2~1~o
Pr~e,
VIII. PHTHALATE ESTERS
IX,
Pht~ate, di.c.melhyl
Phthala~. dl.n-e~hyl
Phthalate, dl.n-butyl
Phthalate. di-n-octyl
Ph~d~. bls(2-othylhexyl)
Phthalat~. bu~/! b~nzyt
POLYCYCUC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
Accmaphlhene
Acen~ohe~ylene
Aflthr~eno
0 O O Ci _
n [3 O [] _
[] [] 13 [] _
[] Cl Cl Cl _
PESTICIDE~
If you are unable to Identify the chemical'constituents of products you use that discharged In your wastewater, attach copies of Ihe materials safety data sheels
for such products.
SF. CTtON D - OTHER WASTES
1. Are any liquid wastes or sludge from this firm disposed of by means other than discharge to /he sewer system?
';'{~ Yes UI No
~f "No," skip remainder of Section D.
If "Yes," complete items 2 and 3.
2. These wastes may best be described as:
Ul Acids and Alkalies
[] Heavy Metal Sludge
[] Inks/Dyes
~ Oil and/or Grease
[] Organic Compounds
I-I Paints
[] Pesticides
[] Plating Wastes
[] Pretreatment Sludge
[] Solvents/Thinners
[] Other Hazardous Wastes (specify)
Estimated Gallons or Pounds/Year
1 O0,000 qallons
;i~Other Wastes (specify)
Oily Sediment
Oily S ludcje
~10,000 qallons
210 tO00 gallons
the above checked wastes, does your Company practice:
[] on-site storage
[] off-site storage'
[] on-site disposal
;[3;off-site disposal
Briefly describe the method(s) of storage or disposal checked above.
- Oily sluc~e will be solidified and trans~~ to a requlated waste dispoal
facility,
- Oily sed_~ _ments will be solia_{fied and transported to a requlated waste diSpOsal-
facility.
S~CTION E - OTHER
Per City request, see attached calculations of free oil raise rate in temporary
'~Baker" type water storage tanks. See Attachment D.
ATTACHMENT A
WATER MANAGEMENT, SAMPLING AND
ANALYTICAL PLAN
WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PI_~I
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY ':'::~".
50,000 BARREL TANK
CONTENT REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION..
April 1998 · -:':~""'
17
K/J 97231:3~00 '
-.. .,.~ :;f.-.:-
· : '.:...;~..~
-. .,
~ .....
.'j.'~ .!-....
Prepared for."
RETAIL INVESTORS, INC.
4450 California Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakerfield, California 93309
Prepared by:
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
1 INTRODUCTION
2 WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
2.`1 Decanted Water
2.2 Water Derived from Sludge Solidification and Cleaning Operations
3 SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALYTE$
3.'1 Water Obtained by Decanting Operations
3.2 Water Obtained from Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations
4 RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMI~LES
4.1 Water Obtained From Decanting Operations
4.2 Water Obtained From Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning OPerations
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY
6.1 Sample Management
6,1,1 Field Log Book
6,1,2 Field Sample Log
6,1,3 Sample Labels and Sea!s
6,2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AN~ CUSTODY ":'.
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL
6,4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
PAGE
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
.3
'4
5
5
7 LABORATORY REPORT
ATTACHMENTS
FIGURES
1
2
3
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
TITLE
Sample Analysis Request Sheet
Water Sample Collection Table
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE
Tank 50001 Water Management Diagram
Typical 500 BBL Portable Water Storage Tank
Discharge Manhole Detail
9971972313.00vhelr~ap. doc i
INTRODUCTION
This Water Management, Sampling and Analysis Plan (WMSAP) has been prepared to
guide discharge operations for water generated from the decanting and cleaning of a
storage tank (Tank 50001) located at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California. The
tank contains approximately 420,000 gallons of free-phase water, and it is anticipated that
additional amounts of water will be generated for discharge from tank sludge solidification
operations and from tank cleaning operations. The purpose of this WMSAP is'to specify
means for removing water from the tank and associated activities and to provide protocols to
determine if the water meets the City of Bakersfield's (City) criteria for disposal of this water
into the City wastewater treatment system.
2
WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following sections describe planned field operating procedures for transferring water
from the Tank 50001 to portable storage tanks for analysis and eventual discharge to the
City sewer after approval of analytical results by the City. .:i.~:~'.'i/!? ..i.'.'-
2.1 Decanted Water .- -:.'~h~:.;~.--:.'.~, ..*-
''Decanted water" refers to the approximately 420,000 gallons of water contained in Tank
50001 between the upper oil layer and lower sludge layer. After floating oil has been . _ .-:.,.2.?_'..:.-..~,
decanted to the maximum practicable extent, this water will b~ removed via pump or gravity
piping tapped into the tank shell to any of five 500-barrel (bbl) "Baker"-type portable water · -' -:; ·
storage tanks located at grade adjacent to Tank 50001. Figure 1 presents the proposed "": "' '"'" '
arrangement. Two thousand five hundred (2,500) bbl (105,000 gallons) of water will be
decanted at one time to these tanks. Care will be exercised in tap or pump suction
placement during decanting so as not to remove fluids at the oil/water or water/sludge
interfaces.
After completion of decanting to the portable storage tanks, each portable storage tank will
be allowed to rest undisturbed for a minimum of one and one-half hours to allow time for any
free oil to float to the top of the tank. The portable storage tank inspection port will then be ;. '.
opened and the tank will be inspected for a visible oil layer. If floating oil is observed, a ..:, -'.
pump will be used to remove the oil to either Tank 50001 or another portable tank dedicated
solely to decanted oil storage. The portable storage tank will again be allowed to rest
undisturbed for one hour and the process repeated until no visible oil is Observed. If an oil
sheen is observed, this will be noted on the portable tank inspection sheet and decanting will
be performed so that 4 inches of water (and the oil sheen) is left in the tank during final
discharge.
The portable storage tank bottom will also be probed for sludge accumulation. If sludge has
accumulated to within 4 inches below the water discharge nozzle (located a minimum of 12
to 15 inches above tank bottom; see Figure 2), a vacuum truck will.be called out to remove
accumulated sludge either back to Tank 50001 or to a dedicated portable sludge holding
tank for later processing. The portable storage tank will again be allowed to rest undisturbed
for a minimum of one hour and the process repeated until accumulated sludge is within 4
inches below the water discharge nozzle.
g;~:~.l~ '19<JT~72"J 13.0~rh,~rs~o. dog: 1 .: ·
Results of the oil and sludge visual inspection will be documented on a record sheet, which
will include portable storage tank number, batch number, date, time, and signature of person
conducting the inspection.
After oil and sludge inspection shows satisfactory condition, the five portable storage tanks
will be sampled as described in Sections 3 through 7 below. Once preliminary sample
results have been obtained from the laboratory for discharge critical parameters (explained
below), the Kennedy/Jenks field supervisor will review laboratory results against the
negotiated discharge limitations set by the City. If the water is compliant with requirements,
the laboratory results along with the five portable storage tank inspection records will be
faxed to the City for release approval. Due to the constraints of limited tankage, laboratory
turnaround times, and the need to discharge water only at night, we request that the City
review results and issue discharge approval by 5:00 p.m. the same day provided that
laboratory results are faxed by 1:00 p.m. If the water is non-compliant with City discharge
requirements, the affected tank contents will be treated using chemical, heat, or physical
means to meet discharge requirements and the portable storage tank will be resampled.
After City approval for discharge has been rec.eived, discharge operatio.ns will begin the
same night during the City-specified off-peakoperating period (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.). All
discharge tanks will be blocked off from receiving decant water from Tank 50001 during the
discharge period. An. operator will be present during discharge operations. Tanks will be
gravity discharged or pumped, as needed, through a 4 to 6 inch surface temporary pipeline'
to a sewer connection located adjacent to the intersection of Rosedale Highway and the
Hungry Hunter/Days Inn driveway (Figure 3). The discharge line will be equipped with an
inline flowmeter and manual control valve so that the operator can maintain flow at or bel°w
City-specified volumetric limits. A high level alarm (warning light) will be installed in the
manhole to warn operators of an impending manhole overflow. Total discharge to the
sewer will be calculated by gauging the tank before and after discharge and recording the
volume on a record sheet along with the date, time, portable storage tank number, batch
number, and signature of the operator.
The sewer connection manhole used for water discharge will be surrounded by a chain link
fence with locking gate to prevent damage or vandalism to the discharge piping and City'
automatic sampling equipment. The fence will also provide a safety bather to prevent
someone from accidentally falling into the open manhole. The City will be provided with a
key to the gate lock.
2.2 Water Derived from Sludge Solidification and Cleaning Operations
Additional water will be generated during the tank cleaning operation by mechanical
separation dudng sludge solidification and from cleaning of the tank prior to demolition. This
water will be managed in the same manner as the water generated from decanting
operations, with the exception that the frequency of sampling will be increased as described
in the following sections. The reason for increased sampling is that the mechanically
separated/tank cleaning water has been in recent contact with oils and sludges and greater
potential exists to pick up trace organic constituents compared with the decanted water
which has settled for several years.
3 SAMPLING OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF ANALYTES
The samplin9 objective is to determine whether water contained in the tank and generated
from tank cleaning operations meets the requirements specified by the City for discharge to
the sewer system.
It is proposed that two water samplin9 protocols be implemented. The first protocol will
apply to decanted water, which is expected to be relatively free of oil and solid's. The second
protocol will be for water that is mechanically separated from the solids or generated by tank
cleaning,
This section describes the rationale used for selecting the analytes for decant and
mechanically separated/tank cleaning water analysis prior to disposal into the City sewer
system.
3,1 Water Obtained by Decanting Operations
Analytes for the decanted water are listed on the sample analysis request sheet in
Attachment 1, Table 1-1. These analytes were selected based on the criteria established by
City Municipal Code Section 14.12.220 entitled "Prohibited Discharges." Analytical
procedures were selected in accordance with Part 136 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR 136).
3.2 Water Obtained from Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations ::- :-.
Attachment 1, Table 1-2 lists analytes for water dedved from sludge solidification and tank :'..-.. -.'
· ... ,. ~; ~ ¥: ,..-'-~
cleaning operations. This list contains more analytes than for decant water in order to ..... ' :"?,,:::i ·
screen for additional constituents which could potentially be solubilized dudng the
., .:~;~:~..,_!
solidification/cleaning processes. ·. :~.'-~,:.~:--: ' ........
4 RATIONALE FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES
4.1 Water Obtained From Decanting Operations .-~
To establish that the decanted water meets City criteria, decanted water will be transferred ..
into a series of five portable storage tanks. Figure 1 shows the proposed arrangement.
Each portable storage tank will contain approximately 21,000 gallons for a total of 105,000 '
gallons. Three water samples will be collected from the upper, middle, and lower elevations ·
in each of the five tanks (15 samples total) and composited into a single sample for analysis.
The composite sample will be analyzed for the complete set of analytes indicated in
Attachment 1, Sample Analysis Request Sheet for "Water Obtained From Decanting
Operations" Table 1-1. If the water meets the City discharge criteria, the City will be given
the results along with a request to approve the discharge of the water. If the water does' not
meet the City's criteria, additional treatment or an alternate disposal option will be selected
for the water.
After the analysis of the composite water sample and discharge of the water from the initial
five portable storage tanks, the process of filling and sampling the five tanks will be repeated
as described in Section 2. Analysis of a reduced number of analytes will be used for'
subsequent batches of decanted water until the last batch which will be analyzed in the
same manner as the first batch. A composite sample of water collected from each of the five
tanks will be analyzed for the reduced number of analytes (i.e. pH, BTEX, and Oil and
Grease) on an immediate turnaround at the laborator7. If the laboratory results for these
parameters meet City criteria, the water will be discharged to the sewer following the
protocol outlined in Section 2. BOD, COD, TDS, and TSS for each batch of five tanks will be
analyzed on a regular laboratory turnaround schedule to provide data to calculate surcharge
amounts, but these data will not be provided to the City until after discharge is 'complete.
This batch process will continue until all the remaining free water is removed from Tank
50001. Kennedy/Jenks estimates that a total of five batches will be necessary to remove the
free water from Tank 50001.
4.2 Water Obtained From Sludge Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations
A mechanical system will be used to solidify sludge and solids in Tank 50001. Any water
generated from the sludge solidification process will be placed into one of the portable water
storage tanks for further processing, discharge, or disposal at an appropriate facility. Once
the initial portable water storage tank containing separated/cleaning water slated for
discharge is full, a representa, tive composite sample made up of three individual samples "
from the upper, middle, and lower elevations in the tank will be collected and analyzed in
accordance with the Sample Analysis Request Sheet for "Water From Sludge
Solidification/Tank Cleaning Operations." If the water meets the City's criteria, the City will
be given the results along with a request to approve the discharge of the water into their
system. If the water does not meet the City's criteria, additional treatment or an alternate
disposal option will be selected for the water. After the analysis of the separated/cleaning
water sample and discharge of the water from the initial portable water storage tank, the
process of filling and sampling the portable water storage tank will be repeated as described '
above. However, a revised sampling and analysis protocol will be used for subsequent ' .'
tanks of separated/cleaning water. A representative sample of the water collected from the
tank will be analyzed for pH, BTEX, and Oil and Grease on an immediate turnaround at the .....-.
laboratory. If the laboratory results for these parameters meet City discharge cdteda, the.
water will be discharged to the sewer. BOD, COD, TSS and TDS will be analyzed on a
regular laboratory turnaround schedule to provide data to calculate surcharge amounts, .~i~!~!i?~:
these data will not be provided to the City until after discharge is complete. This sampling*'~i%;'~'.-'¥?.~- --"
and discharge process will continue until all of the remaining solids have been removed frb.~i?. '"':'
Tank 50001 and the tank.has been cleaned for demolition. Kennedy/Jenks estimates that
approximately two 21,000-gallon portable water storage tanks of separated/cleaning water
will be recovered for discharge dudng the sludge solidification and solids removal process.
5 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The water samples will be placed in the containers listed in Attachment 2. The sampling
equipment will be decontaminated between each sample by washing with an Alconox or
Liquinox solution to remove all visible residues. If necessary, a solvent such as heptane, will
be used to remove any oily residues on the equipment. An acid wash will be used as
required by 40 CFR 136 sampling protocols for metals samples collected in metal sampling
equipment. The equipment will then be rinsed with tap water and rinsed again with distilled
or deionized water. All spent solvent, wash and rinse water will be collected and properly
managed.
~:~OCa% 1997~972313.00Vh,~,tr~a~. doc 4
6 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTODY
This section describes the sampling management and custody treatment of all water
samples.
6.1 Sample Management
6.1/I Field Los Book
Sampling personnel will record general information about each sampling event and specific
information about each sample in a hard bound field log book at the time of sampling.
General sampling information will be recorded in sufficient detail so that such information
can be reconstructed at a later time. Where applicable, the following general sampling
information will be recorded in the field log book:
Facility name
Purpose of sampling
Location at sampling site
Field contact
Description of sampling procedures
Date and time of collection
Weather and other pertinent conditions at time of sample c~llection
Field measurements
Pl~otos, if any
Signature of person responsible for sampling
^ sketch will be drawn in the field log book that shows the approximate dimensions betWeen
the portable water storage tanks, fences, and the tank numbers. A sketch of each portable
water storage tank will also be drawn in the field sampling log indicating each sample
location.
6.'1.2 Field Sample Log
A field sample log will also be kept in the field log book as a record of specific sample
information. The following information will be recorded for each sample:
· Sample Number
· Sample Location
· Date
· Time
· Sample Description (water, etc.)
· Monitoring Data (pH, odor, appearance).
This information will be arranged in columns and a separate page will be prepared for each
batch of samples. The field sample log will be prepared as the samples are collected and
before they are transported from the' site. The information in the field sample log will then be
used to fill out the chain of custody record. Section 6.2 provides information about
completing the chain of custody record. The field sample log will serve as a checklist to
check the information On the sample labels before sealing the sample cooler and
transporting the samples to the laboratory.
g:~x:M1997~.972313. 00~,,~$ap. doc 5
6.1.3 Sample Labels and Seals
Each sample container will be labeled and sealed. Each sample container will be labeled
with the following information at the time of sampling:
· Sample Number
· Sample Date
· Bottle
· ' Batch Number
· Sample Location
· Project Number
· Time
· Preservatives, if any
· Sample Type
· Handling Precautions
· Analytes
· Laboratory
· Initials of Sampling Personnel
6.2 SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION AND CUSTODY
After labeling, all samples will be placed on ice in a cooler for transportation to the
laboratory. In accordance with 'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/OhemiCal'i.~ .~.:
Methods, SW-846," 3rd edition, USEPA, 1986 (SW-846), a chain-of-custody record will ." .-. ':;
document sample possession from'the time of collection until the samples are analyzed. .~:
The record also serves as a sample inventory and analysi~ order form. - --'
The chain-of-custody record will be completed with a waterproof pen. When possession of.
the samples is transferred from sampling personnel to a courier or to the laboratory, the ' '
chain-of-custody record will be signed by both parties. The chain-of-custody record and the '?i.'".'-'
sample analysis request sheet (see Section 3.0) will be placed in a large resealable plaStic '¥
bag inside the cooler. The chain-of-custody record will be included with the analytical data in .
an appendix to the final report concerning the management of this water phase. '
The sample containers will be delivered to a state-certified, third party laboratory. The
laboratory will be notified of the time by which analysis must begin so that the sample
holding times are not exceeded.
6.3 QUALITY CONTROL
The samples will be submitted to a state-certified laboratory for analysis. The laboratory will
be required to prepare and analyze a duplicate, a duplicate spike, and a blank spike for 10
percent of the samples it receives.
Percent relative differences will be calculated by the laboratory for duplicates and percent
recoveries will be calculated for the duplicate spikes. If the percent relative differences or
percent recoveries fall outside the ranges specified in the methods in SW-846 or the
laboratory's acceptable ranges, the laboratory will investigate the mason for the
discrepancy. The investigation may include checking calculations, verifying analytical
g:~x~.~ 19g 71972313.00Vtw~sal3. doc 6
procedures, recalibrating instruments, preparing new reference standards, or reanalyzing
samples.
Since sampling equipment will be decontaminated in the field, equipment blanks will be
collected. After the sampling equipment has been cleaned as described above, samples of
the final rinse water will be collected and analyzed separately. One equipment blank per
daily sampling event will be collected. The sampling equipment blanks check the
thoroughness of the cleaning procedure and the extent of any cross-contamination between
samples.
6.4 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
The maximum holding times for the various analytes range from days to several months.
The holding times are the maximum allowable elapsed times from sample collection to
sample analysis. So that the holding times are not ex~eded, the laboratory must be
instructed to analyze the samples within allowable hold periods.
:.:?-' ' ". '.. i~:i. '
The samples will be prepared and analyzed according to the methods listed in the samPle.· - .."
analysis request sheet, Attachment 1. · -.: '~ ?.'"-. ~ '?~:'~ ·
7 LABORATORY REPORT ...
As a minimum, the laboratory report will indicate the laboratory name, DHS -acc~r~it~-~-v*':''*'':=--:--~::-~-''
number, a statement that it is accredited for the constituents.that were 'anaiyz.ed; 'a~d
accreditation expiration date, sample ·nUmbers, and an'alYfical re'sUlts'~'' Th~:la~orat~ry*'~;~--~.'~',:!': :'~-
will also include quality control data for:each sample batch and a descriPtion'of any..-'
deviations from the published sample preparation or an~iytiCal'methOd~" ~,:' ~':''.'' "' ' ''~' '¥:~";"~"': .....
.... . .:~,~.;~-,
..... '
· -L .1-~-'.. :~".1.
· .:~*-...- -
. ..
..* .~: . . ..;.~
· ~** - ._ :...,~..:-.: .
': * ' ~':;"' ~7. *
FIGURES
POTENTIAL
OIL
REV. oo o 2/27/g8 I
IWATER
' "~'::.1~5o00 f"..' ~'"-"~:~.".'~"::'::::'~.:?: ": .:...'. :: '. :' .'"":
(AFTER :; RE ~ b'VAi ?:t::;~z::?-.'.'''~.''-'!'~ ?" ::,:/': !:.:':-':,. i
OF 'FLOATING "OIL)'"' :"--:!"' '- .-
SEPARATED WATER
FROM SLUDGE
REMOVAL OPERATION
SAMPLE
PORT
SLUDGE REMOVAL AS
REQUIRED VIA VACUUM
TRUCK (TYP T- 1
THROUGH T-5)
SKIMMED
OIL TANK
FLOATING PUMP (usEo.. AS.
NECESSARY FOR OIL REMOVAL
FROM T-1 TO T-5)
OFF SPEC WATER
RETURN TO T-50001
OR OTHER
Not To
TO SEWER.
CONNECTION
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retail Investors
2800 Standard Street
Bakersfield, California
Tank 50001
Wafer Monogemenf Diagram
March 1998
K/J 972313.00
Figure 1.__
40'
Oil
Water
Oily Sediment
Oily Sludge
MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF TANK:
8'- 15.5'
15.5' - 1'7.5'
Total
OilY Sludge 210,000 Gallons
.Oily Sed!~.~nt ...~.~-;. 210,0.~,..0..Ga!lons.
Oil ,t 00,000 Gallons·
920,000 Gallons
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Sparks Estate Property
Kern County, California
Tank 50001 Contents Layers
K/J 972313.00
April 1998
Figure 2
· :.; .~ ..
:".:'""2." . '~
;[.7'.'.:.'-:'..:-.~.':i' 'i.:. . :
t ' ~..''.: :. :". . . . · '
: ~ ,' . ~ ........
~: '... , :~..; .-'. · · .. . · . L.
i" .' ;.:":'..'"' '" ~ . ~ ' ~ ; ' I / t'L '
,..:::.~ .... ..,,.. ..,.. .~ ..- .
: .....
~[;-. ::. ':'~-:.' .".:.-...~*...' ~;~"'~ ~/. i!, -. t~:'~ ', ...~.'"~:,.::~: '..
:i~'.': -::,t':.'. C¢!2.' ..... ~ .... : ~..~ ¢ '~ : i · ~' ',....~ :." ':
'~'~-(.'"""~'~'°' ' · ~ - ----~' . ~.' h ! :';'. '~ '"' '.
' ~':'; .~. · ..'1 · ' ' : · ,'a:'.".':. : '.'~ -:
~kl'".'.: .... ~ ........ .,,-. '":: .... :: ~'-: .;..';
· ~..~1','-*':'"',',"' '- "- ' '~ '=" ' ! '"'"' · ; I '""'-~" · ' ; °':".'""":' ' ' '-
i~?.,-~". :; '-" '-' ",' "' - ~e~..,~ · . . · '-. .~ · ,'.:'-.,. ;:.~ · ..:
:,t7.-'.'-:.- :.- ..., .... -.'. .... ,, ,.-'-..I . .,":-:-.-. <'.. :,.,
~ ...-, ~ ' -'.' ' . ......... ." .... , ~ ".': .... I ,,a .. ..... ..:. :..~.;~:..... -.
::[,.!~ ..... : ,'..-'. · .: ........ : .~.:,.,'... ! ~_- · ,1..:~. :.~:.[~.:.~!:
:~:-... V:,'''{,,.,.-. : '. · · ~' ' . ..' · · ~. -,.,~'1 ~ . : ~ ..s. :.-.'.-:..- ..:.
'If .... -.- . , · · -, ...... · :-.-~t.~. · , ..... '~-: -.,
:1~' '"';"~'"':' ......... ' - ~ -: ' ..',:;--.'.~! ,'~ --.-::-.-',':*- -
-. -; ...... : . .. ~ ...... ,. · . · ~... ..... . · , ,
:~.' .; '.'.: ..... :... · .. · . . .. : .:.,...~:1 ~ ~ ,' .~..- '--'...
~ .... ' '...~ ' I · ' ''. ' . ,. .' ;.: · '
~ ........... .......... .. ....-,,.-.'~t~ · .:,,.' ...... :,..,-.-
.a.,.-,-,,.x .or, , ,-..-: .... ! .... ' '. '.~ ?..',: ,~. "x; · ~; :~. ' -;,,.~ .:. :., ·
~.-'--: ;','..,,~e. · .- .... . . . · · 's : ....... '-~.. ....-.'~'....[..~ .. · · ;;.~.~.':.~ . .~-,'. ,., .... . -...
· ~,.-.. . . · .... '.;'....: ........ '.;, .... . ..
Ih
~'..:..~.~'~..:.:.. ~, ...~.. · .. . · ..-' .. . . ~.'-.';'~,~ ;'.;..',~';. ~',.'.
~ ~ I.:..... . : '. · s · , . · : · · ,,.. · . . :... . .f .,,~-. . . ;.....~..t .j.. ,' ·
.~--~. ,..,..~.. · :-, ... . . .... r~,,.:-.. ! ~-...--. ...:.- .
:~: .... ".~"': ~: ' ' · ......... ' ..... · ........ 'I- i.- .: 2:.,~,~. ...;
~ , ... · . . · . .... ,,.'.~....., ·. ,-.. ,..,.:....
~: ..... · :;..,,, -,~;~'~.:.~'..,.E,~_',~.,~,-~$~,e-~'~. .' · -: ,'.l :.' ..z.-. . -' _ . ';.'.,;'.' .', ....
~..:,.' -..'t'..~.-. · .n~;~n.-~,-, .-'m---n'n.~n-,- ~ ., . :...... :.: ,,~}.' . ~ ~...,'.,.::':.. ,-
l~.· · ','.. -! .- -~.,:.- · ',- .~' ,_.~,. __...-- .'. - t..' -.' ";,~ :. · · L.?.S...., . · · ..
.~. · . : ~ . . · ~. ~.'.! . : ~ . ; ... . · ~. . .
~:' · .'-~:'. ~' · ~- ~ ,,'~'~ .... · .'....: ~'- . .,--.~:~a~ . ""
~.'...:.- '.'., '. ....... . ' ' · .' : ..'.: ~'.. ;'.. ~. ~;, t. ~~~:. ::.. - ~ · '
~. .... :.~..~.. · . · . ~ . , '-%.. - -} .. : .:.;~ .. ..'., ....
...... . .... ,.- ,. . · .. ~.- . '. ; ,..;,"".~.'.~.... ;~
,. .;..., ,..' . . · . , ". . .,....:-:" ...-.. :
~"''::':o 7' . · ".' '~''- ~"' ' ' ' 2t ::'".::."i "'
I:i' ' ' ' ' ' "": ' "' : ' : '; ""':'~'* ' "'
.... '.; =:.. . :., ',., ;:.' . . ~ " ~
; ~ , · '..:.~. ...:
:;:,. ,- .
';' /~,. ':::.
....
; , · t ;. ' '-"-. ; : '' ''
Figure 3
ATTACHMENT 1
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST SHEET
ATTACI~T 1
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST SHEET
NOTE FOR LABORATORY: The purpose of this Sample Analysis Request Sheet is to specify the sample processing, sample
preparation or extraction, and analytical methods and detection limits that are requested for the attached samples. The analysis
numbers on the chain of custody record refer to the item numbers listed below.
If there are any questions, please call the project manager.
SAMPLING SUMMARY
Water samples will be collected from a number of portable water storage tanks. The water is expected to contain suspended solids.
There is one sampling objective: To determine if the water meets· the City of Bakersfield's sewer discharge criteria.
I1. PROCESSING OF WATER SAMPLES
The water samples are expected to contain greater than 0.5%~solid{. Consequently,
O:~,doce%1997T.972313.00viwbteb.doc
the samples will probably require filtering.
III. ,MPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
TABLE '1-1
WATER OBTAINED FROM DECANTING OPERATIONS
ANALYTES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL 'METHOD HOLDING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY SAMPLING
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS .RESULTS
METHOD LIMIT, mglL REQUIRED
BEFORE
DISCHARGE?
Metals Analyses (by City of One composite Yes
Arsenic HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.045 6 months Bakersfield) for first and
Cadmium Cool, 4'C 200.7 0.004 6 months last batch of
Chromium for all metals 200.7 0.007 6 months five tanks
Copper 200.7 0.006 6 months (105,000 gal).
Lead 200.7 0.042 6 months
Mercury 245.2 - 28 days
Nickel 200.7 0.015 6 months
Selenium 200.7 0.075 6 months
· Vanadium 200.7 0.008 6 months
Zinc 200.7 0.002 6 months
Other Parameters
pH none required 150.1 ASAP (by City of One composite Yes
Total Dissolved Solids Cool, 4'C 160.3 7 days Bakersfield) sample for No
Total Suspended Solids Cool, 4'C 160.2 - 7 days each batch of No
Oil and Grease~ Adjust to pH <2 413.1 - 28 days five tanks Yes '
BOD Cool, 4'C 405.1 - 48 hours (105,000 gal). No
COD Cool, 4'C 410.1 - 28 days No
Ammonia (as N) H2SO4 to pH <2 350.2 - 28 days No
LEL - - No
Flashpoint - - No
BTEX Cool, 4'C, 602 14 days (by City of One composite Yes
Benzene 0.008% 0.0002 Bakersfield) sample for
Toluene Na2S203 0.0002 each batch of
Ethylene Benzene HCI to pH <2 0.0002 five tanks
Xylene , -' (105,000 gal).
g:~3ca~199'/~72313.00~b4tlab.4o~
WATER OBTAINED FROM DECANTING OPERATIONS
ANALYTES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD HOLDING DISCHAI~GE FREQUENCY SAMPLING
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
METHOD . LIMIT, mglL REQUIRED
BEFORE
DISCHARGE?
4 Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4°C, add 376.2 7 'days (by City of One composite Yes
Zn(C2H302)2 + Bakersfield) sample for
NaOH to pH>9' each batch of
five tanks
'? (105,000 gal).
~1,(:k)cst 19971972313.(~eb.do~
-2
WATER OBTAINED FROM SLUDGE SOLIDIFICATION AND TANK CLEANING OPERATIONS
ANALYTES SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD HOLDING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY SAMPLING RESI:JLTS
PREPARATION METHOD DETECTION TIME LIMITS OF ANALYSIS REQUIRED BEFORE
METHOD LIMIT, m~l/L DISCHARGE?
Metals Analyses (by City of One composite Yes
Arsenic HNO3 to pH<2 200.7 0.045 6 months Bakersfield) sample for each
Cadmium Cool, 4°C 200.7 0.004 6 months tank
Chromium for all metals 200.7 0.007 6 months (21,000 gal).
Copper 200.7 0.006 6 months
Lead 200.7 0.042 6 months
Mercury 245.2 - 28 days
Nickel 200.7 0.015 6 months
Selenium 200.7 0.075 6 months
Vanadium 200.7 0.008 6 months
Zinc 200.7 0.002 6 months
Other Parameters
pH none required 150.1 - ASAP (by City of One composite Yes
Total Dissolved Solids Cool, 4°C 160.3 - 7 days Bakersfield) sample for each Yes
Total Suspended Solids Cool, 4°C 160.2 - 7 days tank Yes
Oil and Grease~ to PH<2 413.1 - 28 days (21,000 gal). Yes
BOD Cool, 4°C 405.1 - 28 days No
COD Cool, 4°C 410.1 - 28 days. No
Ammonia (as N) H2SO,~ to pH <2 350.2 - 28 days No
LEL - - - No
Flashpoint - - No
BTEX Cool, 4°C, -' 602 14 days (by City of One composite Yes
Benzene 0.008% 0.0002 Bakersfield) sample for each
Toluene Na2S203 0.0002 tank
Ethylene Benzene HCl to pH <2 0.0002 (21,000 gal).
Xylene -
Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4°C, add 376.2 - ASAP (by City of One composite Yes
Zn(C2H~02)2 + Bakersfield) sample for each
NaOH to pH>9 tank
..................................................................................................................... , (71,0.00
References:'Test Melh<xl$ for Evaluating Solids Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods', SW.846. third edition. U.S. Environmental Protecllon Agency. 1988.'Methods for Chemical Analysis ol Wa~er a~ Wasles'.
TI~ 22, CalifOrnia Code of Regutetlons, SeGlJon 88261, Appefldlcell' II and Xi.'
ATTACHMENT 2
WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION TABLE
ATTACHMENT 2
WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION TABLE
ANALYTES ' 'PRESERVATION '" cONTAINER HOLDING TIME SAMPLE METHOD
METHOD
Metals Analyses Cool, 4° C, HNO3 to 250 mi plastic bottle' 6 months 200.7
pH<2
BTEX Cool 4°C, 0.008% 2 40 mi VOA vials 14 days 602
Na2S203, w/teflon septum caps
HCl to pH 2
pH C .ool, 4° C 120 mi plas.tic bottle ASAP "150.1
Oil & Grease, HCl to pH < 2 1 L glass bottle for each 413.1
BODICOD Cool, 4°C test - 405.11410
TDS Cool, 4~C 160.1
TSS Cool, 4'°C - 160.2
Dissolved Sulfides Cool, 4°C .
Zn (C2H~O~) +
NaOH to pH · 9
5
ATTACHMENT B
TABLE 1
COMPARISON OF WATER SAMPLING
RESULTS AND CITY TREATMENT
PLANT CRITERIA
DISSOLVED SULFIDES -
NOTE: RESULTS ARE FROM CITY'S SAMPLE
K/J SAMPLE INVALID DUE TO LABORATORY ERRORi'~ .....
TABLE !
COMPARISON OF ',¥ATER SA,MPLINC_., RESULTS AND CITY TREATMENT PLANT CRI 1-ERIA
September 1997 Sample Results November 1997 Sample Results~
Numerical Analysis Water Water Water Water --
Discharge Prohibition Units Criteria Method 972313-15'-03 972313-1Z-04 972313-12-07 972313-12-08
Flashpoint Oe~l. F < 140 E PA- 1010 > 180 · 180
Fish Bioassa¥' . Passed' Passed'
pH pH Units 6 - 12 EPA-9040 8.23 8.27
TRPH m~/L EPA-418.1 1800 630
Benzene F,g/L 0,50 mg/L EPA-8240 ND ND 0.14 0.13
Benzene (TCLP) mg/L EPA-8240 ND ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene j.L~/L 0.50 m~. EPA-8240 NO ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene F(J/L 5.50 mgJL EPA-8240 ND ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ('i'CLP) mgJL EPA-8240 ND ND
1,2- D ichloroethane mov/L E PA -8240 N D 0.19
1,2-Dichloroethane ("rCLPI m~L EPA-8240 ND ND
Ethyl benzene mo~t. 7.920 m~. EPA-8240 4.5 0.94 0.11 0.13
Methylene Chlodde F~/L 44.0 mo~L EPA-8240 ND ND
2-MethyInaphthalene rog/kg EPA-8270 ND 470
MTBE p~/L EPA-8240 ND ND
Phenols m~;~kg 300 mg/L EPA-8270 ND ND
Tetrachloroeth, ene po~L Zero m~/L EPA-.8240 ND ND
Toluene m~L 3.390 mg/L EPA-8240 6.6 0.72 0.61 0.66 '
Xylenes m~/L - EPA..8240 35 9.9 0.14 0.13 ~.~
Total Disolved Solids m~l' 2700'm~JL EPA-160.1 18600 14200
Total Suspended Solids m~L EPA-160.2 34 109
Ammonia as NH3 m~L EPA-350.1 122 116
BOO m(~ OIL SM17-5210B 120 108 :
COD m~ O/L EPA-410.4 2110 2080 "-~.~- `~':'
Total Sulfide m~.. EPA-376.2 0.40 0.32
L Reactive Sulfide m.._.m.._.m.._.m.._~ SW-7.3.4.2 Non-Reactive Non-Reactive -
~~ ~ SW-7.3.3.2 Non-Reactive Non-Reactive ..~.
~l'Chlorinated Hydrocarbons p~- ~~ EPA-8080 ND ND ~-.-,~.
. >_~.~.~ ...-:.....
Antimomj' m~/L SW-6010 ND ND
Arsenic m~/L 1.00 mg/L SW-7081 0.14 ND
Badum m~L SW-6010 0.42 0.44
Beryllium m~l. SW-6010 ND ND
Cadmium mg/l. 0.19 mg/L SW-6010 ND ND
Chromium mg/L 5.00 mg/L SW-6010 0.32 0.34
Total Hexavalen/Chromium p.g/L - SW-7196 ND ND
Cobalt m~/L - SW-6010 ND ND
Copper mo2t 7.13 mo~/L SW-6010 ND ND .:: ..
Lead ~ 1.45 mo~t. SW-7421 ND ND
Memur~ mg/L 0.09 mg/l. SW-7471 NO ND
Mol,/cx:lonum m~/L 1.47 mo~/L SW.-6010 ND ND
Nickel mg/L 8.64 mg/L SW-6010 ND ND
Selenium m~. 0.45 mo~/L SW-~741 ND ND
Silver m~/L 2.81 m~. SW-6010 ND ND
Thallium m~/1. SW-6010 ND N D
Vanadium m~/L SW-6010 0.42 0.43
Zinc mg/L 5.25 mg/L SW-6010 ND ND
Notes:
ND = Not Detected
Blank = Not Analyzed
* = Test pet'on'ned on sludge sample.
Heights are measured ~rom the bottom of the tank.
4/17/98
SEWER.XLS Page 1 9:39 AM
Ir rol~'~ L~bc
i".
F-fi?
,1~A-376.2
·o
J~o . '- . ..' *. '. "% ·
.~ m~mm~m~d m~mm~m~cmm~md~ddm m~mmm~mm~ ~,~am~mdMmm. m m~mdm~m ~ ~m'Nmm4~m~m~ m~mmm~m,~mam~m~mmm m ~ ~ bmpnmumm~
93313
~O~,12TOT~Q T-Sl Z
*.
!
~a.t,i, Reces.'vea: o3/zz/s8
J. tz:~J:-~T:oz'7 X'o.: -q8-02'1'93-2
r. Uq
~$'A-.376.2
;
· e ~,* e "' *.
·
ATTACHMENT C
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL.
LE'I-i'ER OF NO OBJECTION'
bxtance.~
~ou~e Road
93617
March 30, 1998
Sparks Estate
cio Retail Investors
4550 California Avcnuc, Suite K-303
Bakersfield, California 93309
Pete TRbon ·
Governor
Peter M. Itaanty
Secr~ta~y.tor
~nvironraeraal
Pnneetlon
ROVs ISSUED TO I-GO VAN AND STORAGE AND MR. DARRELL
SPARKS RF~ARDINO TANK 50001, 2800 STANDARD STREET,
BAKERS FIELD, CALIFORNIA
To Whom It May Concern:
This will respond to the March 20, 1998 letter to me regarding the .
status of the violations alleged at I-Go Van and Storage, 2800 Standard St.~ .....................
Bakersfield, Kern County, The specific request was that the Department
review information submitted for the purpose of re.nolving the violations in two
previously issued Reports of Violation (ROVs) as well as review, and appr~¥~
a plan to remove any potentially hazardous waste currently in.Tank 500001..
Tl~c March 20 letter also rcfci'cnccs recent contacts with various staff of..
the Department concerning the best course of action to move forward with the
proposed project ~ wetl as contacL~ wilh the City of Bakersfield and the
Regional Water Quality Control Board concerning disposition of the water and
sludge phases of the waste In the tank.
The Waste Classification lnfomation submitted by Kennedy/Jenks
Consultants also describes Re presence of an oil phase of wastc In thc tank.
Although p. resumptively hazardous, analytical data submitted indicates this
phase to mcct non. hazardous ~-iteria. The proposed removal action states that
the waste will be recycled at the DeMenno Kerdoon facility located in.
Cnmpton, Los Angeles County.
Based upon all of this information the Department has no objection to
thc planned removal 6f the tank contents, The InformatiOn provided also
satisfies the requiremenL~ of the ROVs issued by the Department in 1988 and
1990. In the apparent abscnc~ of Mr. Sparks and thc fimmcinl information
provided concerning the parcel, these ROVs will b'e considered as closed.
DH:CM
Sparks Estate
March 30, 1998
Page 2
Tn assis[ Us in adequately closing our files, please submit any and all
information documenting the final removal and disposition of thc tank and the
tank contents.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr.
Dale Huvetman, of my staff, at (209) 297-3948.
Sincerely,
Gerald H. White
Unit Chief
Statewide Compliance Division
· DIt:CM
'DH33.0~8
?
SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.
Appendix E
Recent Analytical Reports
0¢t-08-98 08:gSam From-BC Lab; 80532?0?$0 T-?12 P.03/05 F-S1?
LABORATORIES
Volac
SOILS £NGIN~ERING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
~AK~RSFIELD, CA 9~313
A~tn: R. BECKER 805-831-5100
Lle Organic Analysis
~PAMechod 8260)
Date Repot=ed:
Date Received:
Laboratory NO.:
lo/o?/ga
o9/3o/9s
98-11381-1~
SamDle Descripuion: SPARKg-PLC, Bi%,I 09/30/98 % 02:3SPM, 10,, R. ~LECKER
Page
2
Constltue~
Scyrene
1.1,1,2-Te~rachloroethane
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroe:hane
Te:~achloroethene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,%-T~chlorobenzene
1.1.1-Trichloroe:hane
1;1,2-Trichloroe:hane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluorome:hane
1,2,3-Tr:chloropropane
1,2,4-Trime:hylbenzene
1,3.$-Trimethylbenzene
Vlnyl Chloride
tal Xylenes
~hyl-t-bucylecher
Surro~
1,2-Dichloroe=hane-d%
Toluene-d8
~-Bromofluorobenzene
Re~ulr~
None Dqcecced
None Dgtected
None D~:ected
None D~=ected
None D~=ec:ed
None D~ tec:ed
None D~
None D~ =ected
· None D~=ect~d
None Detected
None D~/ected
None D~=ected
None D~:ec/ed
None
None D(~:ecced
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/k~
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/~g
mglkg
mg/Kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
m~/kg
mg/kg
m~/kg
mg/kg
mg/k~
10~
10~
~ali=y Control Da:a
~o~ery CO~O1 Limi~
70-121
81-117
74-121
Pr&C:ic&l
0.005
0.005
0.00S
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.00S
0.01
0.005
California D.O.H.g. Ce~:. #1186,
Supervisor
41 DO At:las Ck, - E~eKer,sf.elCl. C
AZ License: AZ03~5
FAX {BE}_~] ~7-1 c:jq ~
0ct-08-95 08:gSam Fr0m-BC Labs
LABORATOR~ES
SOILS ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
~AK~R_qFIELD, CA 93313
Attn: R. ~ECKER 805-831-5100
Samplzng Location: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID: Bi%
Sample Depth: 10'
2ample Man?ix; Soil
Sample Collected By: R. BECKER
Con~t~tuenc~
Benzene
Bromoben~ene
Bromochlorome=hane
Bromodichtorometha~e
Bromoform
Bromomechane
n-Buuylbenze~e
smc-~u:ylbenzene
=erc-Buuylbenzene
Carbon te:faehloride
hloro~e~zene
hloroegh~e
Chlorofo~
C~loromeuh~e
~-Chloro:oluene
4-Chlorouoluene
D~bromochlor~eth~e
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloroprop~e
1,2-Dibr~oe=h~e
Dibr~ome:h~e
1,2-Diehloro~nzene
1,3-Dichtorobenzene
1,%-Diehlor~nzene
Di~lorodifluor~eth~e
1,1-Diuhloroe=h~e
1,2-Dichloroe=~e
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-l,2-Dichloroe=hene
:r~s-l,2-Dichloroe=hene
t,2-Dlc~loroproD~e
1.3-Dichlo~oprop~e
2.2-Dichloroprop~e
1, l-Dichloropropene
cis-l,~-Dlchlor~r~ene
nr~s-l,3-Dich!oropropene
E~hyl Benzene
Me~lorobu=adien~
!sopro~ylbenzene
D-!~opropyl=oluene
~=hylene Chlor~d~
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
80S:32707S0 T-712 P. 02/05
Volatizle OrganicAnalysi$
EPA M~chod 8260)
Page
Dane Reporned: 10/07/98
Da[e Received: 09/30/98
Labora:ory No.: 98-11381-14
Date Collecged: 09/30/98
Da=e Extracted: 10/01/98
Dace Analyzed: 10/01/98
Dilution Used: i
~ 02:3S~M
Practical
Analysis Reporgin~
None Dl:ected 0.005
None De=ecued 0.005
None Dguected 0.005
None Dgtec:ed 0.005
None Deuec=ed 0.005
None D~=ecced 0.005
None D~rected 0.005
None D~=ecced 0.005
~one D~cecued 0.005
None D~tec:ed 0.005
None D~:eeued 0.005
None D~tecued 0.005
None D~=ecued 0.0~5
None D~ec=ed 0.~05
None ~ececned
None D~=ecced 0.0~5
None ~euecced 0.005
None ~euec:ed 0.00~
None ~euec=ed 0.00~
None Deuecued
None ~e~ec~ed 0.005
None ~ecec~ed
N~e ~euec:ed 0.O05
None ~ecec:ed 0.005
None ~ececte~ 0.005
None 9ececced 0.005
None ~ece~ced O.OOS
None ~e:ec~ed 0.005
None Deuec:ed
None Decec:ed o.0OS
None ~enec:ed O.OOS
None )e=ec:ed 0.005
None )e=ecced 0.005
None )e:ec:ed 0.005
None )e:ecced 0.005
None )ecec:ed 0.00~
None )e:ected 0.005
None )e:ec:ed 0.005
None )e:ected 0.005
None ~ecec:ed 0.01
N~e ~e:ected 0.0~5
None Oe:ec:ed 0.005
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mglkg
mg/k9
mg/k~
mg/k9
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/k9
mg/kg
ms/kg
m~/k~
mg/kg
mg/k~
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
ms/kg
ms/kg
m~/kg
ms/kg
m~/k~
m~/k~
mg/k~
mg/k~
~/kg
mg/k~
mg/k~
ms/kg
mg/k~
m~/k~
~/kg.
mg/kg
ms/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
1
4'I O0 Aaas Cc - ~geK~=~sf,=[o, ~A 9~3';JOS · [805'] S~07..,4191 1 - FAX [~05) 3Z"/-I ~'I E!
0ct-08-98 08:2gam From-BC Labs 80552?0?$0 T-?12 P.04/05 F-alT
LABORATORIES
SOILS ~GINR£RING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Accn: R. BECK~R
Sampling Location:
Sample ID:
Sample Depth:
Sample Matrix:
Sample.~Collec=ed ~y:
805-831-5~00
Volatile O~gani¢ Analysis
EPA Me~hod 8260)
~pARKg-PLC
R. ~ECKER
Bromochloromethane
Bromodi chl orome ~ha~e
Bromoform
B romome thane
n-Bunyl~anzene
see-Bu~ylbenzene
ter=-Butylbenzene
Carbon =e:rauhloride
~lorobenzene
%loroe=hane
~loroform
Chlorome~hane
2-Chlorotoluene
Dibromochloro~e=hane
1,2-Dibromo-3-ChloroDropane
l.~-Dibromoethane
DAbro~o~echane
1,2-D~chlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
D%chlorodifluorome=nane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroe=hane
1,1-Dxchloroe=h=ne
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
=rans-l,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-DichloroDropane
1,~-Dichlorogropane
~,2-DichloroDropane
1,1-DichloroproDene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
crans-l,3-DichloroproDene
Z=hyl Benzene
~exachlorobu=adiene
Isopropylbenzenm
p-Isopropyl:oluene
~e=h¥1ene Chloride
ph:halene
Propylbenzene
Date Reported: 10/07/98
Date Recelved: 09/30/98
Labo~a:ory No.: 98-11381-15
Pa~e .$
Analysis
Re~u~
None D~uected
None D~=e¢ced
None
None De=et:ed
None D%sec:ed
None Detected
None
None Dissected
None D~=ec=ed
None D~tected
None D~:ec=ed
None D~ec=ed
None D~uec:ed
None Dgte¢=ed
None
None Dgtec=ed
None Dgcected
None Dguec=ed
None D~=ected
None De:ected
None D~:ected
None D~:ected
None
None Dissected
None D ~=ected
None D~tecued
None D,~tected
None D ~tecced
None D ~tec:ed
None D
None De:ected
None D~cec~ed
None Dpcec:ed
None D~:ec:ed
None
None D~uecced
None
None D~ec=ed
None
None D~[ec:ed
None
None
Repor[ing Quanti=a=ion
mg/kg 0.00S
m~/kg 0.00~
m~/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/~ 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/kg o.00S
mg/kg 0.005
mglkg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.0Q5
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg o.0o5
.ua/kg 0.005
mg/kg O.OQ5
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg · 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.01
mg/k9 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mi re:~.~,~ ImmZ ,n m~t repen am for ~ ,~.clur,,~ .ag of me ~ulmm1~l~g party. BC ~:~ramr~e~. inc. a~'mmea no re~penSlDIkP/mr ~elaafl a~er~m~, ~t'parlig~, ea~gclumm~ ~' IIt~ P~t ~
41 0(3 Az;las ~;. - I~uKeosr,e~Cl. ~ 5~3:BID8 - (EBOn] 3~7-~91 I - FAX [Et~5)3--~7-1 gq B
Date Collected: 09/30/98 m 02:45PM
Da:e Ex:ratted: 10/01/98
Da~e Analyzed: 10/01/98
Dilutlon Used:
Oct-08-g8 08:Zgam From-BC Labs 8053Z?0750 T-?IZ P,05/05
LABORATORIES
Volatile Organic Analysi~
iRPA Method 8260)
SOILS ENGINeeRING Da:e ReDor[ed: 10/07/98
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD Date Received: 09/30/98
BAKeRSfieLD, CA 93~1~ Laboratory No.: 98-11181-15
At=n: R. B~CKER 805-851-5100
Sample Descr~p:ion: SPARKS-PLC, ~141 09/30/98 % 02:%5PM, 15', R- BECK~R
F-317
Page
Con~t$=ue~
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroe=hane
1,1,2,2-Tetrs¢hloroe~hane
Tetrachloroe:hene
Toluene
1.2,3-Triehlorobenzene
1,2.%.T~ichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroeuha~e
1.1,2-Trichloroetha~e
Trichloroe=hene
Trichlorofluorome=hane
1,2,]-Tr=chloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimeuhylbenzene
vinyl Chloride
XyleneS
t-butylether
Re ,ul~s
None D~n~cced
None D~:ecced
N~e D~:ec~ed
None
None D,~:ec=ed
None Dgcec=ed
None DetecteQ
None
Non~ D~=ec:ed
None D~uec:ed
None
None
None
None D~:ec~ed
None
None
None D~tec=ed
Prac~ic&l
Repor=in~ Quan=~=a=ion
mg/kg 0.00S
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.00~
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.01
mg/kg 0.005
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroechane-d%
Toluene-d8
4-Bromo~luorobenzene
O~aliry Control Data
~ ~e~overy Control Li~i~s
10~. ~0-121
10 . 81-117
7~-121
=uart G. Bu:=ram
9arnmen~ supervisor
AZ ~icense: AZ034S
41 OO Al;laS L-~ · i~eker~,~-Io. I~A ~'~1~ · [~) ~22 ~-4~1 I · FA~ [t~tB)-~) ~ ~
0ct-13-98 03:11pm From-Be Labs 60532?0?50 T-g24 P.O8/ll ;-576
LABORATORIES
TOTAL CONCEArfRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261J
Page
SOILS ~NGI~RING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
BAKERgFIELD, CA 93313
Aucn: R. B£CKER 805-831-5100
Dace Reported: 10/09/98
Dace Received: 09/20/98
Labora:ory No.: 98-11381-1~
Sample DescripTion: SPARKS-pLc
Sampling Location:
sample ID:
Sample Depth:
Sa~pling Dace/Tame:
SPARKS-PLC
10'
09/30/98 ~ 02:35PM
Ti[lc 22 Waste Ty~e: Type i: Mill-~ble Solid - No 9ree Liquid
$~ngle Collected By: R. BECK~R
)4~chcH:~ STLC TTLC
Co~=i=uen~s SamD%e Results Units PO,L= Me~hod mg/L . mq/kq
Antimony None Detected mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010
Arsenic 5.6 m~/kg 0.5 SW-g010 5.0
Barium 50. mg/kg 0.$ SW-~010 100. 10000.
Beryllium 0.~2 m~/kg 0.5 $W-6010 0.75 75,
Cadmium None De:cc=ed mg/k~ 0.5 SW-6010 1,0 100.
hromium ~.$ mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 ~60. 2500.
obalu 3,3 m~/k~ 2.5 SW-6010 80. 8000.
opper 22. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 · 25. 2500.
Lead 6.3 mg/kg 2.5 sw-6010 5.0 lO00.
Mercury None Detected m~/kg 0.2 SW-?~71 0.2 20.
Molybdenum None Detected m~/kg 2.5 SW-6010 3~0. 3500,
Nlckel 5.~ mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 ~0. 2000,
Selenium None De:coted m~/k~ 1.0 SW-6010 1.0 100.
Silver None Detected m~/k~ 1.0 SW-6010 5.0 500,
Thall=um None Detected mg/kg 5.0 S~-6010 7.0 700.
Vanadium 38. mg/kg 0.5 SW-~010 2%. 24~0.
Zinc 40. m~/k~ 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000.
P.Q.L. ~
ETLC =
TTLC --
All above cons:i=uen=s are reported o~ an as recaivad (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) aS sample subjected ~o appropriate.
techniques co determzne cocal levels.
Prac:ical Quantitation L~miu (refers co che least amount of analy=e
quantifiable based on sample size used and analytical uechnique employed).
soluble Threshold Limiu Concentra=io~
Total Threshold Limit
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods fo~ Evaluauing Solid wastes Physical/Chemical
RPA-EW-846, September, 1986.
an Schulcz
)oratory Director
41 O0 Ac~as Cc. - Ba~srsf,elCl. CA 9331:~ - (805] 3~7-4911 · FAX (805) 3~7-'1918
LABORATORIES
To=al Petroleum HYd£ocarbonB
Page
SOILS ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD.
~J~F~RSFI£LD, CA 93313
A:=n: BO~ BECKER 805-851-5100
Sample Descrig=ion: Bg~3/SpARKS-PLC
Pro~ecc N%~ber:
Eamplzng Locke=on:
Sample ID:
Sampling Dace/Tame:
Tiule 22 Waste T~e: Type
sample Collec=ed By: R.BECKER
To~al Recoverable petrole~
Hydrocarbons
Date Reported: 10/16/98
Da=e Received: 10/01/98
I~ora:oz~ No.: 98-1~%76-14
8733
SPARKS'PLC !:
B20-10
10/01/98 ~ 02:15PM
Millable gol~d - No F~ee Liquid
None Detecued
Me~Aod
20.
EPA-418.1
Depar=menu Supe~isor
, AZ License: AZ03,
~ ~mm"d~m, ~,~,m~. acdcnmem m ~m ~ ~.
Oct-i~-~80~:5?am ~rom-B~ La~s 8053270750 T-840 P.22/25 F-471
LABORATORIES
Volatile Organi~ Analysis
(EPA Me:hod 8260)
1
SOILS ENGINEERING
%700 DISTRICT BOULEArARD
BAKERSfIELd, CA 93313
Attn; BOB BECKER 805-831-5100
Projec~ Numbe~: 8~33
Samp%~ng Location: ~PAR.KS-P~C
sample ID: B20-10
So.pla Ma[rix: SOIL
Sample Collected By: R.BECK~R
Date Reported: 10/09/98
Date Received: 10/01/98
LaborauoryNo.: 98-11476-14
Date Collected:
Date Hxurac=ed:
Da~e Analyzed:
10/01/98 ~ 02:15~M
~0/06/98
10/06/98
~romobenzene
Bromochlorome=hane
Bromodichlorome=hane
Bromo~orm
Bromomethane
n-Bu=ylbenzene
$ec-Buuylbenzene
ter~-Bu=ylbenzene
Carbon ze~rachloride
hChlorobenzene
loroe=hane
loroform
Chloromethane
2-Chloro=oluene
~-Chlorotoluene
Dibromochloromeuhane
1,2-D~bromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2-D~bromoe:hane
Dibromometh~%e
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,~-P~chlorobenzene
D~chlorodifluorome=hane
1,1-Dichloroe~hane
1,2-D=chloroe=h~ne
1,1-Dichloroe:hene
cis-l,2-Dzchloroe:hene
=rans-l,2-Dlchloroethene
1,2-DichloroDroDane
1,3-Diuhloropropa~e
2.2-DichloroproDane
1.1-Dichloropro~ene
ci$-l,3-Dichloropropene
urans-l,3-D~chloro~ropene
Ethyl Benzene
Kexachlorobu=adiene
p-I$opropyl~oluene
~JeKhylene Chloride
aphghalene
-Propylbenzene
Analysis Repo=ting Q~an~$=a~ion
R~ul=s units Limi[
None Detected mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None ~etected mg/kg
None De~ected .mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None De=et=ed mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None De:et=ed mt/kg
None De:et=ed mt/kg
None Detected mt/kg
None De=et=ed mg/kg
None De~ec=ed mt/kg
None Detected m~/kg
None De,et=ed mg/k~
None Detected m~/k~
None beret:ed mg/kg
None Detected n~/kg
None Detected mt/kg
None Detected mg/kg
None De:et=ed mg/k~
None De:et=ed mg/k~
None De=ecced mg/kg
None De=et=ed mg/kg
None Detec:ed mg/kg
None Detected m~/kg
None De~ecued m~/kg
None Detected mg/k~
None De~ec~ed m~/k~
None De~ec~ed mt/kg
None De~ecced mg/kg
None De~ec~ed mg/kg
None Detected m~/kg
None De=et=ed mg/kg
None Detected mt/kg
None Dececued m~/kg
· None Detec:ed mg/k~
None Detected mg/kg
None Detec=ed mg/kg
None Detec:ed m~/kg
0.005
0.005
0.00~
0,00~
0.005
0 005
0 00~
0 005
0 005
0 005
0 005
0 005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
O.OOS
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.005
0.005
All re~ull~ I~m'*~L'd ,fl ~I1L~ ~epofl afc tot ~ ~-~c~ u,~ o! tlm ~al~{~,mng pally. BC Lal3ora~te~, In¢. m%dlW'a flO I'e~l)on~ly Iw ~ IAifabon. SL'pOI'~T~. ele~L'tm~lrd oe' ~ll~a. paJrt~, dlllq)i'~'lmhgn.
LABORATORIES
Volatile O~s. nic ~nalysis
(£P~ ~ethod 82~0)
~&~e
SOIL~ ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOUT~
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313
A=~n: BOB BECKER
Sam~le Descr=p=ion: 8~33, 9PARKS-PLC,
DaCe Reported:
Date Received:
I~bora:o~y No.:
10/09/98
10/01/98
98-11476~14
10/01/98 ~ 02:15PMo R.BECK~R
Coo~i=uenEs
Styrene
1.1,1,2-Tet~achloroe=hane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroe:hane
Te=rachloroe=hene
Toluene
1.2.$-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4oTrichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trlchloroe=hane
1,1,2-Tr~chloroe=hane
Trichloroeuhene
Trichlorofluorome~hane
1,2.3-Trichloropropa~e
1,2,%-Trime~hylbenzene
1,3.~-Trime=h¥1benzene
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes
,1-c-bu~yle~he~
AnalyS&s Reporting
Results ~ni=s
None Decec=ed mg/kg
None Pe=ec=ed m~/kg
None Denected mg/kg
None De:ec:ed mg/kg
NOne De=ecced mg/kg
NOne De:ecued mg/kg
None De=ec=ed mg/kg
None Detected m~/kg
None Detecued m~/kg
None De=ected mg/kg
None De~ected mg/kg
None De=ected mg/kg
None De:cc=ed mg/kg
NOne De=cc=ed m~/kg
None De=ected mg/kg
None De~ected m~/k~
None De=ec[ed mg/kg
Pr&c:ical
Quanc~&cion
Llmlt
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0_005
0.01
0.005
9urroga~es
1,2-Dxchloroe:hane-d4
Toluene-d8
%.Bromofluorobenzene
Quali~¥ Con~rol Data
Recovery qonnrol Limins
98. 70-12%
104. 81-117
94. 74-121
)arumen= Supervisor
AZ License: AZ0345
Oc~-iZ-ge 09:58am From-BC Ca~s 8053Z70750 T-840 P.Z4/25 F-471
LABORATORIES
Volatile Organic Analysis
(EPA Method 82~0)
Page
SOILS ~NGINEERiNG
4700 DZSTRICT BOULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Accn: BOB B~CK~R 80S-831-5100
Pro3ecc Number: 8733
Sampling Location: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID: B20-20'
Sample ~trix: BOIL
sample Collected By: R.BECK~R
Dace Reporned: 10/09/98
Dace Received: 10/01/98
Labora:ory No.: 9~-11476-15
Dace Collected: 10/01/98 ~ 02:40PM
Date Extracted: 10/05/98
Da~e Analyzed: 10/06/98
ConsT%~u~n~s
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochlorome=hane
Bromodiehlorome=hane
Broaloform
Bromomechane
n-Bu:ylbenzene
sec-Bucylbenzene
tert-Bucylbenzene
Carbon cecrachloride
cChlorobenzene
~loroechane,
hlorofo~
Chlorome~hane
2-Chloro~oluene
4-Chlorocoluene
D&bromochloromechane
1,2-Dibro~o-3-Chlorop~opane
1,2~Dlb~omoe=hane
Dibromome:hane
1,2~Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
l,%-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoro~e:ha~e
1,1-Diehloroethane
1,2-Dichloroerh~ule
l,l-Dichloroeuhene
cis-l,2-Dichloroeuhene
=rans-l,2-Dichloroe~hene
1,2~Dxchloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichlorog~op~Tle
1.1-Dichloropropene
ciS-l,3-Dichloropropene
~rans-l,~-Dichloropropene
E~hyl Benzene
Hexachlorobu=adiene
Isopropylbenzene
p-Isopropyluoluene
&Methylene Chloride
phuhalene
-Prop¥1benzene
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quantita~mon
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Decec:ed m~/k~ 0.00~
None De:ec~ed m~/kg 0.005
None.Detecce~ mg/kg O.OOS
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
NOne De~ected mg/k9 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0,005
.None Deceuted m~/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/k~ 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0,005
None Detected mg/k~ 0,005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Deuec:ed mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.0.05
None Detected mg/k~ 0.005
None Detected m~/k~ 0.005
None Detected m~/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None De:ecced mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg O,OQ5
None Detected mg/kg 0,005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None De~ee~ed mg/kg 0.005
None Decec~ed ~j/kg 0.005
None Deuected mG/kg 0.005
None Detected m~/k~ 0.005
None Deuecced mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Detected m~/k~ 0,005
None Detected m~/k~ O.0O$
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None De~ecce~ mg/kg 0.005
None Detected m~/k9 0,005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None De:ected mg/kg 0.005
None Detected m~/k~ 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/kg 0,01
~one Detected m~/kg 0.005
None Detected mg/k9 0.005
Oct-lZ-9$ 09:58am From-BO Labs 8053Z?0750 T-840 P.ZS/ZS F-471
LABORATORIES
Volatile Organic Analys=s
(EPA Me=hod 8260)
Page
2
SOILS ~NGIN-~ERING
4700 DISTRICT BOIII2~VARD
~KRR~FIELD. CA 93315
Autn: NOB B~CK~R
SamDle Description: 8733, SPARKS-PLO, B20-20'
Da:e Reported:
Date Received:
Labora=ory No.:
~o/o9/9~
lO/Ol/98
98-11676-15
10/01/98 ® 02:40PM, R.BECK~R
Cons~l~uen~
S~yrene
1,1,1,2-Te~r&chloroethane
!,l,2,2-Tetrachlo~oe=hane
Te~rachloroe:hene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,%-Trichlorobenzene
!,l,l-Trichloroe:hane
1,1,2-Trichloroe:hane
Trichloroethene
T~lchlorofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,%-Trimethylbenzene
1.3,$-Trime=hylbenzene
Vinyl Chloride
Total Xylenes
M~=hyl-t-bu~yle=her
Practical
Analysis Reporting Quan~itation
Results Units Limit
None De=ected mg/kg 0.005
None De:ecced mg/kg 0.005
None Decec:e~ mg/kg o.OOS
None De:ecced mg/kg 0.005
None Dececce~ mg/kg 0.005
None De:ecced mg/kg 0.005
None De,et:ed m~/kg 0.005
None De:et:ed mg/kg 0.005
None De:ecced mg/kg 0.005
None De=et=ed mg/kg 0.005
None De=et:ed mg/kg 0.005
None De~ec~ed mg/kg 0.005
None De:ec~d mg/kg 0.00~
None De=e¢:ed mg/kg 0.005
None De~ec~ed mg/kg 0.005
None De~ec~ed mg/kg 0.01
None De:et=ed mg/kg 0.005
S~%rroq&~es
1.2-Diehloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
e-B~omofluorobenzene
Quali=y Control Daza
Recovgx-~ ConD~O1 Limi=s
97. 70-1~1
106. 81-11q
93, 74-121
Suuar: G. Bu=tram
Deparumen= Supervi~or
· 41CXD Ac~-~ Cc - Ba~ersf,e~O. CA 93'--JC~ - [lB05) ~J27-491 I - FAX (IBOS] ~D7-1 91 8
LABORATORIES
r.lOIlO
i
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Page
SOILS RNGINE£RING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
~=nn: BOB BECK~R
saa%plin~ Loca=ion: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID: B20-20'
Sampling Da=e/Time; 10/01/98 · 02;40PM
Sample CotlectedBy: R.B£CKER
Con~=i~uenn~
To=&l Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
None De~ec:ed mg/k~
Da=e Reported: 10/16/98
Date Received: 10/01/98
~&~ory NO.: 98-11496-15
20.
Metho~
~PA-%18.1
C 18
O~=uar~ ~. Bu~tram
Depar~men= Supervisor
, AZ License: AZ03~5
4'100 A:Jac Ct - t=iaker-sf,elcl. CA 93'~08 - [8C2)5) ~27-4911 · FAX [805) 3~7-1 91 8
I
LARORATORIE-~ vol
ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOOLEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Aucn: BOB BECKER 805-831-5100
L:ile Organic Analysis
(EPA Mechod 8260)
Dace Reported: 10/07/98
Dace Received: 10/01/98
Labora:ory No.: 98-11435-2
Sample Descripnion: 8733, SPARKS-P~C, B21-15', 10/01/98 ~ 03:40PM, R.BECK~R
Page
Styrene
1,1,1.2-Te=rachloroech~ne
1,1,2,2-Tecrachloroe:hane
Tecrauhloroe=hene
Toluene
1,/.3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2.~-Trichlofoben~an.
1,1,1-T~zchloroe~hane
1,1,2-Trzchloroethane
Trichloroe=hene
Trichloro~luorome~hane
1,2,3-TrichloroproDax~e
1,2,a-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,$-Trime[hylbenzene
vinyl Chloride
To:a% Xylenes
,1-=-butyle~her
~alysis
None ~ected
None )e=ec=ed
None ~e~ected
None )e=ec:ed
None ~e=ec~ed
None ~ececced
None ~ecec=ed
None ~ecec=ed
None ~e:ected
None ~eteece~
None ~eceeted
None ~eteece~
~one ~ecec~ed
None ~etec~ed
None ~e=ec[ed
None ~etecced
Pra¢=ical
ReDor~ing Quant$~a~on
mg/k~ o.o0S
m~/kg o.0o~
mg/~g o.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/k~ o.005
mg/~g o.005
mg/kg O.005
mg/kg o.OOS
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0,005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg
mg/k~ 0,005
~urroga~,eS
1.2-D[chloroerhane-d4
Toluene-d8
%-Bromofluorobenzene
ualit¥ Control Dace
% ~ ~over~ Control ~$mits~
1(~. 70-121
lO~. 81-11~
95. 74-121
Supervisor
AZ ~ice~ee:
I
I
AZ03%5
usa el'the 5uillW~ pai'~f. 8C L~TOfle~, lng. asSunm~ ,no mponsd~bP/tm' ~ aaemtmo, separation. ~emelm~nl m monl par~ msm~
LABORATORIES
Voll=£1e Organic Analyeis
EPA Method 82'60)
Page
)ILS ENGINEERING
4700 DIgTRICT BOULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 933~3
Attn: ~OB B~CKER 805-831-5100
Project Number: 8~33
Sampling LocatZon: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID: B21-5'
Sample MatrSK: Soil
$~mple Collected By: R.B2CKER
Da~e Reported: !0/07/98
Da=e Received: 10/01/98
L~Doratoz'y No-: 98-11%75-1
Da:e Collected: 10/01/98
Date £~tra¢=ed: 10/05/98
Date Analyzed: 10/05/98
Dilu:ion U~ed: I
~enzene
~romob~nzene
Bromochlorome=hane
~romodichloromethane
Bromoform
BrOmome=hane
n-Bu:¥1benzene
sec-Bu~ylbenzene
[ert-~u~ylbenzene
CaTbon ~etrachlorzde
Chlorobenzene
chloroeuhane
toroform
lorome~hane
2-Chloro~oluene
4-Chloro:oluene
Dibromouhlorome=hane
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2-D%bromoe=hane
D~bromomeunane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzane
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
D~¢hlorodzfluorome=ha~e
l,l-Dichloroe:hane
1,2-Dichloroe=hane
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-l,2-Dzchloroethene
cran$-l,2-Dichloroe~hene
1.2-Dicnloropro~a~e
1.3-Dichloroprogane
2,2-Dichloro~opane
t,l-Dichlorop~opene
cas-l,3-Dichlo~o~ropene
cran~-l,3-Dachlorogrop~ne
Ezh¥1 ~enzene
~exachlorobutadie~e
Isop=opylbenzene
p-Isopropyl=oluene
Methylene Chloride
Naphuhalene
ropylbenzene
None Dicec=ed
None D,~ec:ed
None D~=ec:ed
None D~uec=ed
None D~:ecued
None D~:ec~ed
Non~ D~=ec=ed
None D(:tec~ed
None D~ue¢=e~
None D~cected
None D~tec=ed
None D(tec=ed
None D~ec=ed
None D~=ected
None D~=ec~ed
None Detected
None De=et=ed
None D~ec=ed
None D~=ec:ed
None D~cected
None D~cecced
None De~ec=ed
None De~ec:e~
None De~ected
None De~ec=ed
None De~ec=ed
None De ected
None De ,ec~ed
None De:et=ed
None De':ec:ed
~one De;uu~ed
None De:ectad
None De:ec~ed
None De :ecced
None De:ecced
None De~ec=ed
None Del~ec=ed
None De~cCed
None De~ec:ed
Practical
Reporting Quan:l=a=ion
U~ics Limit
mg/k~ O.OOS
m~/k~ o.oo5
m~/k9 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/~g 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/k~ 0,005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k9 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0,005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
m~/kg 0.005
m~/k~ 0.005
mg/kg O.OOS
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/~g 0.005
mg/~g o.oos
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
mg/k~ 0,01
mg/kg 0.005
mg/kg 0.005
br~orm~, m~. ~ .o m~lX~bd~ for mi~xt -,,mrm~n. r.~m"~, m:,.~nm~ m m~m ~ m~qmml~on
LABORATORIES
SOILS ENGINEERING
%700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
~J~K~RSFI£LD, CA 91313
~==n: ~OB B~CKER 805-831-5100
Sample Description: 8733. SPAR/fS-PL{
ile Organic Analysis
EPA Metho~ 8260)
Da:e Reported: 10/07/98
Date Received: 10/01/98
I~bora=o~y No.: 98-11475-1
2, B21-5', 10/01/98 ~ 03:i~PM, R..BECK~R
Page
2
Styrene
1.101.2-TecrachlorOe~ha~e
1,1,202-Teurachloroe~hane
Tetrachlo~oeuhene
TOluene
1.2,3-T=ichlo~obenzene
1,2,4-Trichlo~obenzene
1,1.l-Trichloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloroetha~e
Trichloroe=hene
Tr=chlorofluor~ne=hane
1,2.3-Trzchloropropane
1,2,4-Trime:hylbenzene
!.3.5-Trimethylbenzene
vAn¥1 Chloride
To:al X¥1enes
Methyl-t-bu[yle:her
1,2-Dichloroe=hane-d%
Toluene-d8
%-Bromofluorobenzene
R~e lyszs Reporting
None i~eened m~/kg
None ~eKected mg/kg
None ~etected mg/kg
None ~e=ec=ed m~/k~
N~e D~tec=ed mg/kg
N~ne ~etecred m~/k~
~one ~e=ec~ed mg/kg
None ~e=ecned mp/kg
N~e Detected m~/k~
None Deuec:ed mg/kg
None Denec~ed mp/kg
None ~e=ec=ed m~/kg
None ~e:ec~ed mg/kg
None ~etec=ed m~/kg
None ;erected mg/kg
None )e=ec:ed m~/kg
~uali=y Con=rol Da=a
· ~ ~cowp~
Practical
Quanti=a=ion
Limit ,
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.00~
0.005
0.005
O.OOS
O.OOS
0.005
· 0,005
86, Al
License: AZ0345
Cont~Q%
70-121
81-117
$4-121
O.OOS
0.005
0.00~
0.005
0.01
0.005
_ABORATORIES
To=al Penroleum ~¥droc&rbons
Page
£NGINE~RING
4700 DISTRICT BOtTLEVARD
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313
Au=n; BOB BECK~R 805-851-5100
Pro3ec= Ntzmber: 8733
Sampling Loca=ion: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID; B21-5'
Sampling Da~e/Ti~e: 10/01/98 ~ 03;15PM
Sample Collected By: R.B£CK~R
Da=e Reported: 10/12/98
Da=e Received: 10/01/98
Laboratory No,: 98-11%75-1
Const=D~ents
To=al Recoverable Petroleum
~ydrocarbon~
~amp~e ReSults
None De~ected
Me=hod
Units P.O,L. Me~ho~
mg/kg 20. EPA-418.1
S=uar= ~-. Bur=ram
Superviso~
· AZ License:
An itsula b~tua on md mpofl ire Mr I~ ez:tuS,& u~ m me ;.l~Ja3r, g i)ir~/. Ge ~)oc'd~. I~ asuumfl I~o req~oml~iliW lOC repolt lilJL'rl~, 6Clm."M~. Oeu~mcl~ O~ ~ra pafly tn~prum,o~.
4't 00 A~lms C~. - E3aKec'sf,clcI, C:A 9~:~EI · [Ei0~ 9E7-41~ I · FAX [E]0~] 3ET-q E}q 13
LABORATORIES
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California C6de of Regulations, TiTle 22, Sec:ion 66261)
Page
SOILS ~NGINE~RING
4900 DISTRICT ~OULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 9331]
A=tn: BOB BECK~R 805-831-5100
Date Reported:
Da:e Received:
Laboratory No.:
Sample Descr~p~zon: 8733/SPARK~-PLC
Pro3ec= Number:
Sampling Loca=ion~
Sample ID:
Sampling Dace/Time:
8733
SPARKS-PLC
B21-1S'
10/01/98
Tmtle 22 Waste Type: Type i: M~llable Solid - No Free Liquid
Sample Collected By: R.~ECKER
10/09/98
10/01/98
98-11&7~-2
Re~ula:ory
Cri:eria
~ho~ STLC TT~C
Cons~itueo~ Sample Resul~ b~ni~$ P.Q.L. Me~hod mq/L m~
Antimony None Detected mg/kg 5,0 SW-601O '15. SO0.
Arsenic -1 1.0 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 5.0
Bari~ 32. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 100,
Beryllmum None Detec:ed m~/k~ 0.5 SW~6010 0.75 75.
Cadmium None Detected mg/k~ 0.5 SW-6010 1.0 100,
Chromium 8.7 mg/k~ 0.5 SW-6010 ~60. 2500.'
Cobalt None Detected mg/kg 2.5 ~W-6010 80. 8000.
~opDer *1 39. mg/kg 6.5 RW-G010 25. 2500.
2.9 mg/k~ 2.5 SW-6010 5.0
M~rcury None Detected mg/kg 0.2 SW-7471 0.2
Molybdenum None Detected mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 .3S0. 3500.
N~ckel None Detecued mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 20. 2000.
Selenium None Detected mg/kg 0,$ SW-6010 1.0 100,
Silver None Decected mg/k~ 1,0 SW-6010 5.0
Thalllum None De~ected mg/kg 5.0 Sw-6010 7.0
Vanadium 15. mg/kg 0.S SW-6010 2&. 2~00.
Z~nc ~1 30. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250.
ISee Las: Page for Commen:s, Definitions, and References)
All ~ h~e4 ,n mm repO~l am fm !~ cz~kna,t:~e~e al 1~ ~ ~ 13~ Lal~oralmq~, Ira: im~ume~ no m~poat, l~llty for repoll a#m-~fl. :lelam111~. oe~lt.l~rll 0t i~ra ~ m~i'p~ml~n
41 (DO A~laS {~: · ElaK~r--=f,elO. CA 8~B~BOE) - [1~05) 51E~7~;,91 1 · FAX [1~05) ~1~7-3 cJ1Ei
.ABORATORLES
Total Pe=rQleum Hydrocarbons
Page
SOILS ENGINEERING
%700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
AC=N: BOB B~CK~ 805-8~1-~100
Da:e Reported: 10/12/98
Da:e Received: 10/01/98
Laboratory NO-: 98-11%95-2
~anmple Descrip[±on: 8933/SPARK$-PLC
Pro3ec: Number:
Samplzn9 Location:
~ample ID:
Sampling Dace/Time:
8733
SPARKS-PLC
B21-15'
10/01/98
Tiule 22 Was=e Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free
Sample Collec:ed By: R,~£CKER
Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Method
sample Resul~ Unius ~ Meuhod
None Degecce~ mg/kg 20. ~PA-418.1
OScuarc G. Buccram
Depar:men: Supervisor
AZ License: AZ0345
All rg~,a~ II.mS m th~ ~ am tm* ~ e&clu:slv~ use ~x ire soDItt4tmg puTTy. Bt: I. lborator~, I1~. &BtSuffm~ fTo f~S4)~d)dlD/for I~p0~
LABORATOAIE5
Vol
SOILS ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOULEVARD
~UkKERSFIELD, CA 933%~
Autn: BOB B~CKER 80S-831o5100
Projecu N~mber; 8733
Sampling LocatiOn: SPARKS-PLC
Sample ID: B21-15'
sample Ma:r~x: Soil
Sample Collected By: R.$ECK~R
Con~cluu~nt~
Benzene None
~romobenzene None
Dromocnloromeuhane None
Bromodichloromethane None
Bromoform None
Bromomethane None
n-Buzylbenmene None
sec-Bu~ylbenzene None
ueft-Butylbenzene None
Carbon tetrachloride None
Ch!orobenzene None
Chloroeuhane None
ehloroform None
hloromechane None
2-Chloro=oluene None
4-Chlorouoluene None
Dibromocnlorome~hane None
1,2-Dzbromo-3-Chloropropane None
1.2-D~bromoezhane None
Dibromomeuhane None
1,2-D~chlorobenzene NOne
1,3-Dichlorobenzene None
1,4-Diahlorobe~zene None
Dichlorodzfluoromathane None
1,1-Dichloroe=ha~e NOne
1,2-Dichloroethane None
1,1-Dichlo~oethene None
cis-l,2-D~c, hloroethene None
Erans-l,2-Dichloroethene None
1.2-Dichloropro~an~ None
1,.3-Dichloropropan~ None
2,2-Dichloropropane None
1.l-Dichloropropene No~e
eis-l.~-Dichlofopropene None
crans~l,B-D~chloropropene None
E~hyl Benzene None
Hexachlorobu:adiene None
Isopropylbenzene None
p-Isopropyltoluene None
Methylene Chloride None
Naphthalene None
mropylbenzene None
~uile Or~anicAnalysas
(EPA Method 8260;
A~.~lysis Reporting
R~ulu~
D~=ecued mg/kg
D~tee~ed
D~=ecsed m~/k~
D~tecued m~/k~
D~ected m~/k~
D~tec:ed mg/k~
D~tected m~/kg
D,~tec=ed mg/k~
D,~zeeued mg/k~
D~ec=ed mg/k~
D,~tec~ed m~/k~
D,~tected mg/k~
D~ tee=ed mg/kg
D,~:ec~ed mg/k9
D~=ected mg/kg
D~tec:ed mg/k~
D~tec:ed mg/kg
D(~ec:ed mg/k~
~Itec:ed mg/kg
zee=ed mg/kg
Detected mg/k~
Deteu:ed mg/k~
Detected mg/kg
Detected m~/k~
D~tec=ed mg/k~
De~ected m~/~g
De~ec=ed m~/kg
DeMeoted m~/kg
Dehected mg/k~
De:ected mg/kg
De:eczed mg/kg
De~ected m~/kg
De:ected
De:ected ~/kg
De:ec=ed mg/kg
De,zee=ed ~/k~
De, zee:ed mg/k~
De~:ec=ed mg/k~
De~ec~sd m~/k~
De~ec=ed m~/k~
Page
Date Reported: 10/07/98
Date Received: 10/01/98
Laboratory No.: 98-11475-2
Date Collected: 10/01/98 ® 03:%0PM
Date ~xzracced: 10/05/98
Date A~alyzed: 10/05/98
Dilution Used:
Practical
Quanuitasmon
Limit
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
O.OOS
O. OOS
0,005
0. 005
0. 005
0.005
0.005
0.O05
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.0%
O.OO$
O.OOS
93308 · [805) 327-4911 - FAX [1~105] 3a7-1 9q ~
.ABORATORIES
To=al petroleum Hydrocarbons
P=ge
1
SOILS ~NGINEER%NG
4700 DISTRICT ~OULEVARD
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93313
A==n: BOB BECK~R 805-831-5100
Date Reported: 10/12/98
Date Received: 10/01/9a
Laboratory No.: 98-11475-3
SamDle Description: 8733/SPARKS-PLC
P~ojec= Number: 8733
sampling Locau~on: SpARKS-PLC
Sample ID: B21-20'
sampling Da=e/Time: 10/01/98 ® 0]:50PM
T±=i~ ~ Waste Type: TyDe i: Mzllable Solid - No F~ee Liquid
Sample Collected By: R.~RC~R
To=al Recoverable ~e=roleum
Hydrocarbons
S...a~.le Resul=s U~$=s
None Detected mg/kg
Me=hod
20.
EPA-418.1
OSuuar= G. But=ram
Depar=men= SuDervisor
AZ LicenSe: AZ0]4S
LABOR~TDR~ES
TOTAL CONCRNTRATIONS
(California Code of Regula:ions, Title 22, Secuion 66261)
SOILS ENGINEERING
4700 DISTRICT BOIIL~%rARD
BAKERSFIELD, CA 93313
Attn: BOB BECKER 805-831-5100
Date Repot:ed; 10/09/98
Da:e Received: 10/01/98
Laboratory No.: 98-11%75-3
Sample Descfip:=on: 87]]/SPARKS-PLC
Pro3ecc Number:
sampling Location:
Sample ID:
SamplZng Da=e/Time:
8?33
SPARKS-PLC
~21-20'
10/01/98 ~ 0]:50PM
Title 22 Waste Type: Type $: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid
Sample Collected By: R.BECK~R
Method
Sample Resul=~ Units P~Q.L=
3~3t~mony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryll~ua%
Cadmium
Chromium
!obal=
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Ni eke 1
SeleniLt~
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
l~echod
Regulatory
STLC TTLC
None De:ected mg/k~ 5.0 SW-6Ol0 15.
'1 1.1 mg/kg 0.5 Sw-g010 5.0
29. m~/kg 0.5 EW-6010 100. 10000.
None De:et:ed m~/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75
None Detected m~/kg O.S SW-6010 1,0 100.
4.7 m~/kg 0.~ SW-6010 560. 2~00,
None Detected m~/k~ 2,~ SW-6010 E0. 8000.
~1' 6.3 mg/kg 0,~ SW-6010 · 25. ~00.
None De~ected m~/k~ 2.~ SW-6010 5.0
None Detected mg/kg 0.2 SW-?~?i 0.2
None Deuee:ed mg/kg 2.5 ~W-fi010 3~0. 3500.
None De~ec~ed m~/kg 2.5 SW-6010 20. 2000_
None Denecued mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 !.0 100_
None Detected mg/kg 1.0 SW-6010 5,0 500.
None De:et:ed mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 7.0 V0O.
15. m~/k~ 0,5 SW-6010 2~, 2400,
'1 15. mg/kg 2.5 ~W-6010 2~0. 5000.
See Laa~ Page for Commenu~, Defini=ion~, and References)
41 O0 A=las r'~ . Ba~=r"~f, elO. CA 9.9,308 · [El05) 32.7-~191 I · FAX (BI35] 527-1 91 8
WASTE CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
SPARKS ESTATE PROPERTY
TANK 50001
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
March 1998
K/J 972313.00
Prepared for:
RETAIL INVESTORS, INC.
4550 Califomia Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Prepared by:
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612-1311
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I WASTE INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Name and Address of Waste Facility ........................................................................ 1
1.1.1 (a) Mailing Address .......................................................................................... 1
1.1.2 (b) Location at Which Waste is Located, if Different from Above ...................... 1
1.1.3 (c) Contact Persons and Phone Numbers ........................................................ 1
1.2 Description of the Waste ........................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 (a) Physical Description .................................................................................... 1
1.2.2 (b) Quantities Produced Per Unit Time ............................................................. 1
1.2.3 (c) Process Used to Generate Waste ............................................................... 2
1.2.4 (d) Present Method of Waste Disposal ............................................................. 7
1.3 Sampling Information ................................................................ ~ ............................... 7
1.3.1 (a) Name and Address of Companies That Have Sampled The Waste ............ 7
1.3.2 (b) Name of Person(s) Who Sampled The Waste ............................................ 8
1.3.3 (c) Dates and Locations of Collected Samples ................................................. 8
1.3.4 (d) Description of Sampling Methodology ......................................................... 8
1.4 Testing Laboratory .................................................................................................... 9
1.4.1 (a) Name and Address of the Testing Laboratory for the
Kennedy/Jenks Samples: .......................................................................................... 9
1.4.2 (b) Test Methods and References: ................................................................... 9
1.4.3 (c) Names and Qualifications of Persons Testing Waste ......................... ~ ........ 9
1.4.4 (d) Preparation of Laboratory Samples From Field Samples .......................... 10
1.4.5 (e) Sample Identification Information .............................................................. 10
1.5 Quality Assurance and Control ................................................................................ 10
1.6 Laboratory Results ..................................................................................... ; ............ 10
1.6.1 (a) Waste Components and California Waste Extraction Test Summary ........ 10
1.6.2 (b) Total and Soluble CAM Metals ............................. ; .................................... 11
1.6.3 (c) Aquatic Bioassay ....... . ............................................................................... 11
1.6.4 (d) Other Miscellaneous Parameters .............................................................. 11
1.6.5 (c) Submission of Data and Reports ............................................................... 11
1.7 Acute Toxicity Calculations From Published Data ................................................... 11
1.8 Corrosivity, Flammability, Reactivity ........................................................................ 11
1.9 References (Attach Complete Citations) ................................................................. 12
1.10 Certification of Information Regarding the Contents of this Tank ........................... 12
1.10.1 (a) Limitations of Investigation ...................................................................... 12
1.10.2 (b) Certification ............................................................................................. 13
2 OBJECTIVE OF THE WASTE INFORMATION REPORT ................................................ 14
3 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 15
3.1 (a) History ............................................................................................................... 15
3.2 (b) Recent Developments ................................. ~ ..................................................... 16
g:~97231300.doc i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
4 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ............................................................................................ 17
4.1 (a) Applicable Federal and State Regulations ......................................................... 17
4.2(b) Constituents of Concern .......- ............................................................................. 17
4.3 (c) Methods of Analyses ..................................................................... · ..................... 18
4.4 (e) Discussion of Results ................................................... ~ ............. .. ...................... 19
4..4.1 Oil Phase ....................................................................................................... 19
4.4.2 Water Phase .................................................................................................. 20
4.4.3 Solid/Sludge Phase ............................................................. ........................... 21
4.5 (f) Mitigating Factors: .............................................................................................. 24
5 CONCLUSIONS ............................................. ~ ................................................................ 25
g:~97231300.doc ii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Laboratory Results, Oil Phase - Title 22 Metals
Dixon's Test for Outliers
Summary of SW 846, Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Oil Phase -
Title 22 Metals
Summary of Laboratory Results, Oil Phase - Organic Compounds
Summary of SW 846, Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Oil Phase -
Organic Compounds
Summary of Laboratory Results, Water Phase - Title 22 Metals
Summary of SW 846, Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Water Phase -
Title 22 Metals
Summary of Laboratory Results, Water Phase - Organic Compounds
Summary of SVV 846, Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Water Phase -
Organic Compounds
Summary of Laboratory Results, Sludge Phase - Title 22 Metals
summary of SW 846, Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Sludge Phase -
Title 22 Metals
Summary of Laboratory Results, Sludge Phase - Organic Compounds
Summary of SVV 846. Statistical Calculations on Laboratory Results, Sludge Phase -
Organic Compounds
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE
Site Location Map
Waste Classification Decision Diagram
iii
APPENDIX
A
B
C
'D
E
F
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
LIST OF APPENDICES
Regulatory Agency Information
A-1 Department of Toxic Substance Control File Review.
A-2 Department of Toxic Substance Control Contact Notes
^-3 Kern County Environmental Health Services Department File Review
A-4 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Contact Notes
Sparks Estate Information
Lab Analyses - Kennedy/Jenks Sampling
Lab Analyses - Histodc Sampling
Site Reconnaissance & Tank Content Sampling (Historic Document)
Laboratory Statement of Qualifications (Kennedy/Jenks Sampling)
g:~97231300.doc ~, iV
1 WASTE INFORMATION
1.1 Name and Address of Waste FacilitY
1.1.1 (a) Mailing Address
Property is in bankruptcy.
Mr. Patrick Kavanaugh
Darrell and Jody Sparks Family Trust Bankruptcy
Federal Bankruptcy Trustee
1331 "L" Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
1.1.2 (b) Location at Which Waste is Located. if Different from Above
I-GO Van and Storage Facility
2800 Standard Street
Bakersfield, CA 93308
1.'1.3 {c) Contact persons and Phone Numbers
Mr. Craig Dial
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612-1311
(714) 261-1577
Mr. J. I. Salas
Retail Investors, Inc.
4450 California Avenue, Suite K-303
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(805) 393-1996
Contact persons and phone numbers are for parties preparing the waste information report, not
for the property owner of record as of 13 March 1998 (issue date for this document). Retail
Investors, Inc., is considering purchasing the property on which the tank is located from the
current owner. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants prepared the Waste Information Report on behalf
of Retail Investors, Inc.
t.2 Description of the Waste
1.2,1 (a) Physical Descri.~tion
The waste consists of approximately 1,000,000 gallons of oil, water and solids. The waste is
contained in a 2,100,000-gallon tank (Tank 50001) located at the above location.
1,2.2 (b) Quantities Produced Per Unit Time
The waste in the tank is not currently being produced. Some of the materials are reported to
have been present at the time of the purchase of the property during the late 1980s. The
g:~7231300.doc ~ 1
volume of the contents of the tank at the time of purchase could not be confirmed. At the
present time, it is assumed that the oil will be removed by truck and sold to an oil recycler. The
water will be pumped into adjacent portable tanks for testing, and, if acceptable to the City of
Bakersfield (City), it will be discharged into the City's wastewater treatment system at a
maximum rate of 150 gallons per minute (gpm). The sludge will be physically removed from the
tank and managed in accordance with its classification.
'1.2.3 (c) Process Used to Generate Waste
As noted previously, the exact source of all materials in the tank is not known. Contacts were
made with the agencies identified below to determine the source of the contents of the tank.
Phone logs of these discussions are included in Appendix A. Mr. Darrell Sparks, the most
recent property owner, was interviewed. Phone logs of these discussions are contained in
Appendix B. ^ brief summary of the findings is as follows:
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (KCEHSD)
· A complaint was filed on 17 July 1988 regarding the use of material from a 50,000-barrel
tank as a dust binder.
· An inspection on 10 August 1988 indicated that approximately 25,000 barrels (1,050,000
gallons) of wet crude oil was in the tank. The material in the tank was analyzed by the
facility owner for heavy metals - none of the hazardous threshold levels in the Califomia
Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22 were exceeded. The KCEHSD collected a sample
from a tap on the side of the tank.
· KCEHSD observed sampling of the 50,000-barrel tank on 20 September 1988. Samples
were collected at three depths and composited for analysis.
· KCEHSD advised Mr. Jerry Dingman of the Sabre Oil Refinery to obtain authorization from
the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cai EPA), Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) before removing any materials from the tank.
· Discussion with KCEHSD on 8 November 1996 indicated that DTSC was the lead agency
for action regarding material in the tank.
Department of Toxic Substances Control
· A letter, dated 26 August 1988, requesting laboratory data for samples collected from Tank
50001 was issued to Texaco Trading & Transportation, Inc. ('l-l-ri).
· DTSC contacted TI-FI to discuss the results of testing on the tank contents. 'I-I'TI indicated
that the material had properties similar to water that may have been used for ~pipe or tank
cleaning." The samples were collected with glass thieves from the upper, middle and
bottom strata inside the tank.
· On 23 December 1988, DTSC issued a Report of Violation (ROV) to I-Go Van and Storage
(I-GO) ind'icating that materials stored in the 50,000-barrel tank may contain hazardous
levels of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX). Final DTSC laboratory results
were not completed, and therefore information from a sample obtained by Mr. Jerry
Dingman on 20 September 1988 was used to make this determination. The DTSC also
requested that I-GO characterize the waste in the storage tank and apply for an U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) generator identification number. I-GO responded
g:~7231300.doc 2
to the DTSC in a letter, dated 3 January 1989, by submitting an EPA ID Notification form
and a supporting document describing what action had been taken regarding the ROV. A
procedure for tank cleaning prepared by AM Pumping, Inc., was subsequently submitted on
23 November 1989, and described activities the company would undertake to clean the
tank.
· A DTSC memo to file, dated 2 May 1990, indicates that I-GO may be going out of business.
· A DT$C letter to Zalco Laboratories, Inc., dated 9 May 1990, requested all analyses of
samples collected by Mr. Jay Morris on behalf of I-GO.
· A DTSC letter to file, dated 26 June 1990, discusses past efforts to address cleanup of the
tank contents.
· DTSC issued an ROV, dated 3 August 1990, to Mr. Darrell L. Sparks indicating that I-GO
does not have a hazardous waste facility permit to store hazardous waste and that I-GO
had not characterized the waste in the storage tank.
· GJL Environmental was retained by I-GO to develop and implement a sampling plan. A
letter, dated 31 August 1990, was sent to the DTSC submitting the sample plan for review
along with a Part A Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility Permit Application, dated 20
August 1990.
· A DTSC memo to file, dated 14 November 1990, indicated that a meeting with Mr. Gary J.
Leary on behalf of I-GO took place at which the DTSC was asked to name the Sabre Oil
Refinery and Bank of Amedca in the ROV. Naming Sabre Oil Refinery was requested
because the tank in question was purported to have been used for gasoline storage by
Sabre. After the gasoline was sold, Sabre used the tank to store w~.stewater generated
from its dehydrator unit. It was Mr. Leary's opinion that Sabre was aware that the
wastewater in the tank was hazardous as far back as 1985.
· DTSC responded to the meeting held on 14 November 1990 by issuing a letter approving
the sampling plan and advising that Sabre Oil Refinery and Bank of America would be noted
in the files as possible future responsible parties.
· DTSC issued a letter, dated 27 November 1990, indicating that, as a result of I-GO's filing
for an Intedm Status storage permit, the Enforcement Branch was closing its files and
turning the file over to the Permitting Branch.
· In an internal DTSC report, dated 16 October 1991, it was noted that the Surveillance and
Enforcement Branch had accepted the I-GO sampling plan submitted by GJL Environmental
dated 31 August 1990. In an effort to be consistent, the Surveillance and Enforcement
Branch opted to oversee the characterization sampling which occurred on 15 October 1991.
· ' Duplicate samples from the characterization sampling conducted on 15 October 1991 were
analyzed by BC Laboratories, the DTSC Hazardous Matedal Laboratory (HML), and Eureka
Laboratories, Inc. The analyses included metal scan, flash point, total organic halides, and
BTEX. Of note were three sludge samples that were collected dudng this period that were
analyzed for STLC lead. While two samples were non-hazardous, one sample, collected ~
below the 9-foot level in the tank, exceeded the STLC lead criteria. The review of the data
indicated that the only hazardous constituent found was soluble lead in the bottom sludge at
a concentration of 9.2 mg/l. The sampling inspecti~)n report recommended that the bottom
sludge be considered hazardous, that the O-foot to 3-foot and 9-foot to 12-foot intervals be
g:~97231300.cloc 3
re-sampled and analyzed for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TC'LP) benzene,
and the volume between 3 feet and 9 feet be considered non-hazardous.
· On 22 November 1991, internal DTSC correspondence from DTSC, Region I, to Mr. Brad
Parsons, Senior Hazardous Materials Specialist, discusses significant differences in the
DTSC HML data set compared to splits collected by BC Laboratories, along with
recommendations for further analysis, including lead.
· On 11 December 1991, internal DTSC correspondence from Technical Support SerVices
Branch to Mr. Bruce Butterfield, Associate Hazardous Materials Special!st, further discusses
the above data discrepancies and recommends additional VVET lead analysis.
· No other wdtten information was contained in the DTSC file for the post-1992 pedod.
· In September 1997, DTSC indicated that they oversaw the 1994 sampling of the tank
contents done by Park Environmental Corporation for the Sparks Estate. DTSC further
indicated that the site was identified as a hazardous waste site and Notices of Violation
(NOV) had been sent to Sabre and I-GO. DTSC also contacted the EPA Region IX to
determine the lead agency status for this property.
· On 2 December 1997, DTSC (Clovis) met with Kennedy/Jenks to discuss options for
remediating the tank contents. During this discussion, the possibility that the tank may have
contained a listed refinery hazardous waste was mentioned. Kennedy/Jenks was asked to
discuss this listed hazardous waste issue with Mr. Allen Ito (DTSC Sacramento). It was
also recommended that Kennedy/Jenks discuss its testing protocol with Mr. Ron Pilofin,
DTSC Waste Classification Unit Chief.
· Kennedy/Jenks discussed the potential listed hazardous waste issue with Mr. Allen Ito on 4
December 1997. Mr. Ito indicated that DTSC has no knowledge that a listed refinery
hazardous waste was placed in Tank 50001.
· On 9 December 1997, Kennedy/Jenks met with Mr. Ron Pilodn of DTSC regarding possible
classification of the matedal in Tank 50001. Based on information discussed in the meeting,
it was determined that a self-determination of waste classification would potentially be the
most effective approach to use. Mr. Pilodn indicated that fish bioassays on all phases of the
waste and TCLP analyses for lead and benzene should be included in the report. Also, Mr.
Pilodn indicated that the number of samples required to provide a statistically valid data set
should be calculated in accordance with the EPA Guidance Document SW-846 for each
analyte to confirm that the data are representative of the nature of the waste.
· DTSC met with Kennedy/Jenks on 10 December 1997. Based upon a suitable self-
determination report and submission of a work plan, DTSC indicated that it would relinquish
oversight so that tank cleanup could be handled as a generator project.
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CV RWQCB)
· The CV RWQCB was contacted on 20 January 1998 to determine whether it had received
any complaints associated with this tank. Mr. Sheldon Gray indicated that the CV RWQCB
has not had any involvement regarding the contents and management of this tank.
Interviews with Mr. Darrell Sparks and Attorneys
Mr. Sparks and his attorney, Mr. Scott perlman, were interviewed in February 1998 in an effort
to better ascertain the origins of the waste in Tank 500001. Mr. Sparks would consent to
interview by telephone only, as he wishes that his current location be kept confidential. Mr.
g:~97231300.doc 4
Peflman is an attorney in current practice in Bakersfield,.Califomia, who was involved in
litigation on behalf of Mr. Sparks against the Sabre Refining Company. Records of telephone
conversations and correspondences with both parties are contained in Appendix B. Mr. Sparks
gave his wdtten consent for Kennedy/Jenks to discuss the case with Mr. Pedman and to review
the legal case files if they could be located.
Litigation efforts were underway in 1993, although the claim was not pursued. One of the
central issues to the litigation was that Sabre Refining Company had continued to place
unknown wastes into Tank 50001 during the period the tank and property were being sold to
Mr. SpaRs. These wastes were allegedly placed by truck. Mr. Pedman indicated that he had
obtained a subpoena for Sabre's records as part of discovery. A number of shipping records
and one hazardous waste manifest were obtained from Sabre for wastes allegedly placed in
Tank 50001. The single hazardous waste manifest was dated 25 March 1985, and the
generator was listed as Demenno/Kerdoon. (There is a Demenno/Kerdoon TSD facility located
near Los Angeles, CA, although Kennedy/Jenks is not able to confirm that this is the generator
location without the actual manifest document).
Mr. Pedman commented that he recollected the manifest was for characteristic hazardous
waste, although he stated that he, too, would need to view the document to confirm his memory
as to the exact nature of the waste.
Kennedy/Jenks specifically inquired as to whether Mr. Pedman or Mr. Sparks could recollect if
any listed wastes were ever placed in Tank 50001. The Kennedy/Jenks representative
conducting the interview defined what a listed waste was and described examples of potential
K-listed wastes from petroleum refining processes that would be of concem, based upon the
fact the tank used to be connected to an oil refinery. Specifically discussed were waste codes
K048, K049, K050, K051, and K052, and the processes used to generate theSe wastes. Mr.
Sparks and Mr. Pedman stated that they were not aware of any such wastes being placed in
the tank.
Mr. Sparks speculated that he had suspicions that some of the non-hazardous matedal
shipping records located during litigation were not fully representative of what was placed in the
tank, but proof was not found. Mr. Doug Johnson, the owner of Sabre Refining Company, has
since died, which added further difficulty to the legal research being conducted by Mr. Perlman.
Kennedy/Jenks has made an extensive four-week effort to locate the legal files to which Mr.
Sparks and Mr. Perlman referred. Mr. Pertman was retained to assist with locating these files.
The search has been extremely difficult due to the fact that Mr. Perlman separated from the firm
that conducted the initial litigation (Byrum, Holland), and Byrum, Holland itself split after Mr.
Pertman left.
Mr. Perlman was able to locate only a portion of the case files for Tank 50001. His
investigatory report is contained in Appendix B. Only one remaining avenue of investigation is
left open in Mr. Perlman's report, which is to further investigate the record storage area at
Byrum, Holland, Mr. Perlman's previous firm.
KennedylJenks retained Byrum, Holland to locate the missing files. The legal secretary, Ms.
Cindy Allen, who initially archived the file, searched the Byrum, Holland record storage facility
on 13 February 1998, accompanied by Kennedy/Jenks personnel. After a thorough search, no
g:~97231300.doc 5
case files were uncovered. Ms. Allen indicated that there is a slight possibility that the missing
files were re-boxe'd, and she would investigate further during a planned file storage move.
Kennedy/Jenks concluded its search for the Sparks litigation files with Mr. Perlman's report.
the event that more relevant information surfaces, a supplemen, t to this report will be issued.
The portion of the case file that Mr. Peflman was able to locate was copied and furnished to
Kennedy/Jenks. Mr. Sparks gave written permission for Kennedy/Jenks to utilize the
information. The recovered files consisted of approximately 125 'pages of material, including
the following:
In
· File index (describes 28 boxes of files)
· Deposition of Jim Madden, former plant manager of Sabre Refining (copy in Appendix B)
· Miscellaneous laboratory analytical results (determined to be copies of results
Kennedy/Jenks had already included from o{her sources in Appendix D, and therefore not
duplicated in Appendix B)
· Cai EPA DTSC report from B.A. Butterfield, dated 16 October 1991, which is a duplicate of
the report Kennedy/Jenks obtained from its DTSC file search and, therefore, is not included
in Appendix B
· Inventory field accounting records for 30 September 1985, including Tank 50001 (copy in
Appendix B)
· Miscellaneous vacuum trUck service records for loads moved in and out of Tank 50001
(included in Appendix B).
The-Madden deposition and vacuum trUck records contain insights into some of the waste
generation practices at this location.
Mr. Madden stated that Tank 50001 was originally in crUdeoil service, not gasoline service as
indicated by other parties in the past. He also stated that only one shipment of hazardous
waste was received from Demenno/Kerdoon, and that this waste was not placed into Tank
50001. Rather, the material was received into Tank 10001 for treatment along with a number of
other non-hazardous wastes. Water and sludges from wastes in Tank 10001 were routinely
transferred to Tank 50001.
Mr. Madden also stated that the hazardous waste load incident resulted in a cessation of
refining privileges for materials from Cai Western Fuels, who operated the 10001150001 tank
system.
The vacuum truck service records show that miscellaneous refinery fluids were placed in Tank
50001, including the following:
· Wash water
· Rain water
· Sump oils
· Tank bottoms
· Sump water.
g:~7231300.doc 6
To summarize, these documents do not indicate that hazardous wastes (listed or
characteristics) were directly placed in Tank 50001. The only questionable practice uncovered
was the movement of uncharacterized waste residual from Tank 10001 to Tank 50001. It is,
therefore, concluded that in the absence of such information, Tank 50001 contents require
characterization based upon measurable characteristics.
1.2.4 (d) Present Method of Waste Disposal
The waste is not currently being disposed.
1.3 Sampling Information
1.3.1
(a) Name and Address of Companies That Have Sampled The Waste
Company Name Date
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
I-Go Van & Storage
3747 Gilmore Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Texaco Trading & Transportation, Inc.
P. O. Box 2087
Bakersfield, CA 93303
Califomia Department of Health Services
(now the Dept. of Toxic Substances Control )
5545 East Shields Avenue
Fresno, CA 93727
California Department of Health Services
(now the Dept. of Toxic Substances Control)
1515 Tollhouse Road
Clovis, CA 93612
Cai Western Fuels
4242 Vonaire
Bakersfield, CA 93306
Mr. Jay Morris
8808 North Central Avenue, #148
Phoenix, AZ 85020
California Republic Bank
P. O. Box 2468
Bakersfield, CA 93303
10/6/97; 11/24/97;
12/18/97; 12/19/97
7/2/87
11/17/87
8/10/88
10/1.~/91
9/20/88; 9/23/88;
1105/89; 1/09/89
12/7/89; 12/13/89
10/15/91
g:~97231300, doc 7
Company Name Date
Park Environmental Corporation
5100 East Hunter Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92807
12/30/93
1.3.2 (b) Name of Person(s) Who Sampled The Waste
Vadous persons in Kennedy/Jenks' employ and its subcontractors participated in the sampling
of this material. All personnel were trained in following proper U.S. EPA SW-846 protocols to
collect representative samples from the tank.
Persons who may have sampled the waste for the various companies identified above (except
for Kennedy/Jenks) are unknown.
1.3.3 {C) Dates and Locations of Collected Samples
All samples were collected from the I-GO tank located at 2800 Standard Street, Bakersfield,
California. The specific sample collection dates, along with the name of the company
responsible for the sampling, is shown in Section 1.3.1
Kennedy/Jenks' sample analytical results are provided in Appendix C. Analyses for other
historic sampling events are provided in Appendix D.
A site reconnaissance report and sampling plan was prepared in 1993 by Park Environmental
Corporation. This report is provided in Appendix E as part of the historic information concerning
the tank contents.
'1.3.4 (d) Description of Sampling Methodology
Sampling techniques and/or procedures used for the pdor historic sampling events are not
known. A brief description of the 1997 Kennedy/Jenks sampling event is as follows:
1. Sampling'Technique at Site or Facility by Kennedy/Jenks:
Samples were collected through a man-way in the roof of the tank at three different phase
elevations within the tank. The first was at the surface of the fluid in the tank. The second
was at a location that was observed to be pdmadly water, and the third was at the middle
and bottom portion of the solid/sludge layer. The samples collected from each phase were
transported under an appropriate chain-of-custody protocol to BC Laboratories, Inc., a
California-certified laboratory.
Sample Handling and Preservation Prior to Laboratory Analyses
Because of the large void space between the man-way on the top of the tank and the liquids
in the tank, all samples were collected in a bomb-sampler. This allowed samples to be
collected at precise depths in the tank. VVhen the bomb-sampler was lowered to a specific
depth, it was activated to collect a sample at that depth. The full bomb-sampler was then
closed and returned to the top of the tank. In order to collect samples in the sludge layer, a
length of pipe was used to push the bomb sampler into the sludge. The contents were then
transferred from the bomb-sampler to appropriate laboratory-prepared sampling containers.
g:t97231300.doc 8
1.4
The containers (bottles) were closed with Teflonm-lined caps. The samples were
immediately documented, labeled and placed on ice until delivery to the contract laboratory.
Testing Laboratory
1.4.1 (a) Name and Address of the Testing Laboratory_ for the KennedylJenks Samples:
BC Laboratories, Inc.
4100 Atlas Court
Bakersfield, CA 93308
(805) 327-4911
Other laboratories used by pdor parties conducting sampling of this tank are as follows:
ZALCO Laboratories, Inc.
4309 Armour Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
California Department of Health Services
Hazardous Materials Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way
Berkeley CA 94704
Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Wildlife Water Pollution Control laboratory
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Eureka Laboratories, Inc.
6790 Florin Perkins Road
Sacramento, CA 95828
Sierra Laboratories
1525 Endeavour Place
Anaheim, CA 92801
'1.4.2 {.b) Test Methods and References:
See Sample Analysis Sheets in Appendix C and Appendix D.
1.4.3 {c) Names and Qualifications of Persons Testing Waste
.For BC Laboratories, Inc.:
Mr. J.J. Eglin, President, and Mr. Dan Schultz, General Manager. Other staff are described
along with their qualifications in the enclosed SOQ provided in Appendix F.
For other laboratories used by prior parties conducting sampling, this information is not known.
g:L97231300.doc 9
1.4.4 (d) Preparation of Laboratory_ Samples From Field Samples
All 1997 laboratory samples were prepared in accordance with SW-846 procedures.
Kennedy/Jenks has no information regarding methods used to prepare samples collected by
other parties.
1.4.5 (e) Sample Identification Information
Each 1997 sample was given a unique identification number that indicated not only where the
sample was collected, but also at what depth in the tank the sample was collected (see
Appendix C). Kennedy/Jenks has no information regarding sample identification used for
samples collected by other parties.
t.5 Quality Assurance and Control
For BC Laboratories, Inc.:
(a) On file with the DTSC HML yes [ X ] no [ ]
(b) Enclosed yes [ X ] no [ ]
Specific quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the samples analyzed in this report are
contained in the laboratory reports in Appendix C. QA/QC information, if available from other
laboratories, is provided in Appendix D.
'1.6 Laboratory Results
· i.6.'1 {a) Waste Componer~ts and California Waste Extraction Test Summary
Constituents for analysis were identified for the material contained in Tank 50001 based upon
expected constituents prese_nt in oil refining industry wastes and upon discusSions
Kennedy/Jenks had with Mr. Ron Pilorin of DTSC. As discussed earlier, a minimum of four
samples were collected to satisfy data set statistical validity requirements. Constituents are
defined in the table below:
Waste Components of Tank 50001
Constituents of Interest Oil Phase Water Phase Sludge phase
Total CAM Metals X × X
Soluble (WET) CAM Metals* If Needed ' If Needed If Needed
TCLP for Selected Metals* If Needed If Needed If Needed
Total BTEX X X X
TCLP for Benzene X × X
PCBs and Organochlorinated Pesticides X X X
*If needed; see section 4.3.
Appendix C contains results of analyses for samples collected by Kennedy/Jenks. Appendix D
contains analytical data collected by all prior parties. Kennedy/Jenks believes that the latest
sampling data (1997) is most representative of what is currently in the tank. This is particularly
true for organic components that have been stored in a vented closed-roof tank for over 10
years. Nonetheless, we have included all information for analysis of both data sets in an
attempt to be as unbiased as possible in determining the characteristics of the waste.
g:~97231300.doc : 1 0
'1.6.2 (b) Total erld Soluble CAM Metals
The data tables indicate that for the oil and water samples, all CAM metals were present in
quantities below their respective Total Threshold Limit Concentration ('I-tLC) and Soluble
Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) hazardous waste criteria. For the sludge layer, all CAM
metals were present in quantities below their respective TTLC hazardous waste criteria.
STLC analyses were run when analyzed total metal values were greater than 10 times the
STLC hazardous waste threshold value. STLC lead results ranged from 0.25 to 9.2 rog/l,
compared to the STLC lead threshold value of 5 mg/I. These results are discussed in Section
4.4 in greater detail.
1.6.3 (c) Aquatic Bioassay
Aquatic bioassays were performed on a number of samples and are included in the data
presented in Appendix C, All of the aquatic bioassay samples tested indicate that the samples
do not have an LDs0 of less than 750 mg/I.
'1.6.4 {d) Other Miscellaneous parameters
The following additional analytical results were collected:
, Solid/Sludge
Parameter Oil Phase Water Phase Phase
BOD 120 mg/I
TDS 18,600 mg/L
PCBs (4) . <2,0 mg/kg <2,0 mg/kg <0.2 mg/kg
PCBs (2) <4.0 mg/I · <0.02mg/I <3.0mg/kg
Organochlorinated Pesticides (~) ND ND ND
Flash Point 122OF (4) >180OF >140OF (~)
Total Organic Halogens (4) - 1300 mg/kg 2100 mg/kg
NOTE~ (~) DTSC HML data samples collected 10/15/91
(2) Kennedy/Jenks data samples collected 1997
1.6.5 {c) Submission of Data and Reports
See Appendix C.
'1.7 Acute Toxicity Calculations From Published Data
It is anticipated that these materials will not show acute toxicity because of the nature of the
contaminants, which consist mostly of naturally occurring materials such as crude oil, water and
sand.
1.8 Corrosivity, Flammability, Reactivity
Corrosivity: All phases were tested for pH. None of the samples indicated a pH of less than 2
or greater than 12.5. Based upon pH results, no phases exhibit the characteristic of corrosivity.
Flammability: The flash point was run on the oil and some of the oily water samples. The oil
had a flash point as iow as 128° F. While this value is below the threshold level for determining
whether a waste meets the criteria of an Ignitable Characteristic Waste, it must be noted that
the oil is to be recycled; under the provisions of the California Health & Safety Code, Section
25143.2, such a waste may be recycled and, by being recycled, may be excluded from the
universe of hazardous waste provided all the conditions sp,ecified in 25143.2 are followed. The
flash point of the oily-water samples were greater than 180 F. Flash point is not relevant to
solid/sludge samples because the EPA has not developed standardized procedures for the
determination of ignitability using flash point criteda on solid samples.
Reactivity: Reactive sulfide and reactive cyanide analyses were run on the oil, water and
solid/sludge samples. There was no indication that the samples exhibited the characteristics of
reactivity.
1.9 References (Attach Complete Citations)
Title 22, Califomia Code of Regulations, Chapter 11
"Test Methods for Evaluating Solids Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods," SW-846, Third
Edition, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986.
"Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process," EPA QA/G~, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1994.
"Guidance for Data Quality Assessment - Practical Methods for data Analysis," EPA QA/G-9,
QA96 Version, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996.
"Data Quality Objectives Decision Error FeasibilitY Trials/(DQO/DEFT) - User's Guide," EPA
QA/G-4D, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994.
'Data Quality Evaluation Statistical Toolbox (Data QUEST) User's Guide, QA96 Version," EPA
QA/G-9D, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
See record of telephone communication with Dr. Bart Simmons of DTSC, Director of the HML in
Berkeley, California.
t.10 Certification of Information Regarding the Contents of this Tank
1.10.1 (a) Limitations of Investigation
This report was prepared by Kennedy/Jenks on behalf of Retail Investors, Inc., and is based on
a review of available environmental records and available information, interviews, and visual
observations of recent site conditions. Kennedy/Jenks' activities, including sampling, were
conducted in accordance with practices and procedures generally accepted in the
environmental consulting field. This report represents Kennedy/Jenks' professional opinion and
judgment, which are dependent upon information obtained dudng the performance of consulting
services. Any opinions and recommendations presented apply to the conditions existing at the
time of performance of services. Kennedy/Jenks is unable to report on or predict events that'
may impact the site following performance of the described services, whether occurring
naturally or caused by the action of others. Kennedy/Jenks assumes.no responsibility for
conditions it is not authorized to investigate or conditions not generally recognized as
g:~97231300.doc 1 2
environmentally unacceptable at the time services are performed. Kennedy/Jenks is not
responsible for changes in applicable environmental standards, practices, or regulations
following performance of services.
1.'10.2 (b) Certification
'1 certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the
information submitted in this report and all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those
individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe th. at the information
is true, accurate, and comPlete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting '
false information, including the po~ssibility of~n~nd imprisonment.'
Signature: ~'~-~'-"~-I . ~×~//~,,"1,...,~.~
Printed Name: Craig E. [~. P.E,
Title:
Manager. Facilities Engineering. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Date: 13 March 1998
g:~97231300.doc ~
OBJECTIVE OF THE WASTE CLASSIFICATION INFORMATION REPORT
Retail Investors, Inc., is considering acquiring the subject parcel and tank located at 2800
Standard Street in Bakersfield, Califomia, for purposes of site redevelopment. In order to
proceed with site redevelopment, existing Tank 50001 must be emptied and removed. The
purpose of this waste classification information report is to establish the characteristics of the
waste stored in Tank 50001 so that it may be managed in an environmentally sound manner in
compliance with applicable state and federal hazardous waste laws and regulations. Specific
environmental regulations include CCR Title 22, as well as 40 CFR. Methods used to meet this
objective were to review available records and interview the former site owher to ascertain
whether federally listed wastes were placed in the tank, and to utilize sample analytical results
to determine if the waste is or is not characteristically hazardous.
Based upon the lack of evidence of listed wastes' being placed into the tank, it is proposed that
the wastes be managed in accordance with their characteristics, as determined by analytical
sampling conducted in accordance with SW 846 and EPA data analysis protocols. In order to
meet project timelines, Retail Investors, Inc., proposes to manage the tank contents removal as
a generator without DTSC formal oversight.
g:~7231300.doc 14
3 FACILITY DESCRIPTION
3.1 (a) History
The tank is located on vacant land at 2800 Standard Street in Bakersfield, California. The
location of the site is shown on Figure 1. The site is bounded on the east by State Highway 99,
on the south by Rosedale Highway, on the west by commercial property, and on the north by
the Sabre Refinery. The tank was constructed in 1979 in accordance with APl-650 standards
and is identified as Tank 50001. The tank has a capacity of approximately 2,100,000 million
gallons (50,000 barrels) and is approximately 95 feet in diameter and 38 feet tall. The tank was
originally owned by Sabre Transportation and was connected to the Sabre Refinery until
approximately 1985, when the property and tank were sold to Mr. Darrell Sparks, also known as
I-GO Van and Storage Company (I-GO). Notes in the records reviewed at KCEHSD indicate
that the tank was originally used by Sabre Refinery to store gasoline and, once the gasoline
was sold, Tank 50001 was used to 'store wastewater generated from their (Sabre's) dehydrator
unit." Inspections made by the DTSC on 10 August 1988 indicate that the tank was half full (at
the 21-foot level) of wet crude oil. Further, the inspector noted that the matedal had been
analyzed for heavy metals and that metals were present in concentrations exceeding the
hazardous waste characteristics as defined in CCR Title 22. A sample was collected from a tap
on the side of the tank and analyzed (see Appendix D, sample DH0105, dated 8 August 1988).
There was no indication in the DTSC inspector's notes that the tank might have contained a
listed hazardous waste.
Samples of the tank contents had previously been collected by T'I'TI on 17 November 1987.
These samples were collected in an effort to determine the suitability of the material for use by
Texaco at its refinery in Bakersfield. The material, however, was never taken or transported to
the refinery (see laboratory analyses, dated 17 November 1987, in Appendix D.)
Cai Westem Fuels sampled the contents of the tank on 20 September 1988. The results from
this sampling indicated that levels above the CCR Title 22 hazardous waste threshold level for
benzene were found in the tank (see laboratory analyses, dated 20 September 1988, in
Appendix D).
Additional samples of the tank contents were collected on 7 December 1989. Laboratory
analyses are included in Appendix D. Subsequently, a Transportable.Treatment Unit (TTU)
application was filled out and sent to the DTSC for review and approval. Treatment was begun
in December 1989. On 19 December 1989, the DTSC inspected the operations. The
operations were shut down for the Christmas holidays and were never restarted.
On 3 August 1990, the DTSC issued an ROV and requested that I-GO submit a sampling plan
for characterizing the material in the tank and a plan on how I-GO was to manage the materials
in the tank after the sampling results were known. GJL Environmental was retained by I-GO to
prepare a sampling plan. The plan was submitted to the DTSC on 31 August 1990. On 27
November 1990, as a result of additional discussion with the DTSC, DTSC issued a letter to I-
GO indicating that the Enforcement Branch of the DTSC was closing its file and transferring the
file to the Permitting Branch. The DTSC nevertheless approved the sampling plan as written
and requested one week's notice to observe the sampling of the tank.
On 10 October 1991, sampling of the tank finally occurred. The DTSC and GJL collected split
samples and had them analyzed by BC Laboratories and the DTSC HML, as well as Eureka
g:~72313<X).dOC 15
Laboratories, Inc., a contract laboratory to DTSC HML. Review of the data by DTSC HML
personnel indicated that the sample results did not indicate any of the wastes to be hazardous.
Nonetheless, It was recommended that the sludge layer be treated as a hazardous waste. A
formal written notification to I-GO to that effect was not found in the DTSC files. Subsequent
DTSC internal correspondence questions the validity of the analytical results based upon a
large variation in split sample analytical results.
Additional samples were collected by Park Environmental Corporation of Anaheim, California,
on 30 December 1993, on behalf of Mr. Patrick Kavanaugh, Federal Bankm. ptcy Trustee for the
Sparks Estate Bankruptcy. The samples were analyzed by Sierra Laboratories.
3.2 (b) Recent Developments
Retail Investors, Inc., is considering purchasing the property for possible development
purposes. As part of the due diligence, a Phase I environmental site assessment report was
prepared for this property. A copy of this report has been furnished to DTSC (Clovis) under
separate cover. During the. investigation for the Phase I, the existence of the tank and its past
history were identified. On 6 October 1997, samples of the three phases were collected in the
tank. Analytical results of these samples are presented in Appendix C. After additional review,
more tank samples were collected on 24 November and 18 and 19 December 1997. These
samples were analyzed and the results are included in Appendix C.
4 REGULATORY OVERVIEW
4.1 (a) Applicable Federal and State Regulations
The federal regulations that cover the material in this tank are found in Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (40 CFR), Section 260 et seq. Since this federal program has been
delegated to the state of Califomia, the Califomia regulations take precedence over the federal
regulations. The California regulations are found in Title 22, California Code of Regulations
(CCR), Title 22, Section 66260 et seq..These regulations stipulate means and criteria for
determining whether a waste is considered to be hazardous by either listing '(due to generating
processes within a certain industry) or by characteristic.
Agency files and information obtained from the former site owner indicate that listed hazardous
wastes, as specifically identified in 22 CCR, 66261.30 et seq., were not placed in Tank 50001
(see history discussion in section 3).
The criteria for the identification of characteristic federal and California hazardous wastes are
defined in 'l-~tle 22, Article 4 of CCR. Pursuant to 66260.200(c), it is the generator's
responsibility to determine if the waste is hazardous and, if the generator determines that the
waste is non-hazardous, the generator may proceed to manage the wastes as non-hazardous
or apply to the DTSC for approval of the generator's self-determination non-hazardous
classification. Retail Investors, Inc., has opted to prepare a self-determination instead of
requesting DTSC's concurrence with their non-hazardous waste determination. It should be
noted, however, that the cdteda found in Title 22, Section 66260.200(m), CCR, along with
guidance previously mentioned in Section 2.0, are followed.
4.2 (b) Constituents of Concern
Constituents of concern were developed based upon the following:
· General waste characterist~'c criteria defined in the regulations (namely reactivity, corrosivity,
ignitability and toxicity)
· The observed nature of the waste
· Pdor analytical work
· Potential generating processes (specifically oil refining processes)
· Discussions with DTSC.
Reactivity, corrosivity and toxicity are of concem for all phases (oil, water, sludge) in this type of
waste, and were identified as required analytes. Ignitability is a concern only in the oil and
water phase, as EPA has not developed an analytical method for solid/sludge samples.
Fish toxicity tests were utilized as an indicator of toxicity, as well as California and federal
metals, namely total ('I-rLC), soluble (STLC), and federal (TCLP).
Organics, such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene, are expected components of
crude oil and are therefore also constituents of concern. In addition, DTSC requested that
contaminants such as chlorinated solvents, chlorinated pesticides, and PCBs be considered as
potential contaminants.
Lastly, the City requested analysis of the water phase to determine Whether the ~vater from
Tank 50001 could' be disposed of into its treatment plant. Wastewater properties, such as pH,
BOD, COD, total sulfides, ammonia, and oil and grease, were analyzed to satisfy City
requirements.
4.3 (c) Methods of Analyses
Numerous samples of the various phases in Tank 50001 have been collected over the past 10
years. Arguments can be made against including historical data, as well as in favor of including
these data. Based upon discussion with Dr. Bart Simmons of DTSC HML, {he entire data set
(those collected Kennedy/Jenks data, as well as those analytical data collected by others) has
been considered in the evaluation of the waste phases in Tank 50001. The following discussion
will focus on the procedure used to review the analytical data.
Histodc sampling data and new samples were collected for each phase. The results were then
interpreted in order to assess whether that phase exceeded hazardous waste threshold cdteda.
Figure 2 is a flow chart that presents the decision-making process. This diagram was
developed from recommendations contained in SW 846, EPA GA/D-9, and discussions with Dr.
Simmons (see references and Appendix A). The process is as follows:
1. Collect at least four samples (the minimum number required per SW 846) in each phase.
Obtain historic data results from other parties.
2. Analyze the samples collected in accordance with methods defined in SW 846 in each
phase for the constituents of concern. For the CAM metals analyses, the 'i-I'LC was
performed on each sample first.
3.- Compile data results (historic and current) and vedfy that laboratory quality control results
are satisfactory. If all sample results are non-detect and a minimum of four Samples have
been collected, the data is not analyzed further as it is not hazardous for this analyte in this
phase. If any detections are obtained, check the analyte data set for potential outliers using
EPA G-9 DATAQUEST program (Dixon's test) for sample sizes less than 25 and using the 1
percent confidence level. (The model allows the use of either a 1 percent of a 5 percent
confidence level. The 1 percent confidence level is thought to be more conservative.) If
statistical outliers are identified, evaluate whether there is scientific justification to discard
the datum. The mean, standard deviation, and 80 percent upper confidence inten/al (80%
UCI) is then calculated for the data set with and without the outliers removed. For data
reported as non-detect, use one-half the practical quantification limit (PQL). Results of both
calculations are then documented.
4. If no outliers are identified, calculate mean, standard deviation, and 80% UCI.
5. For metals, results are then reviewed and if TTLC analytical results are greater than 10
times the concentration of the STLC, then the sample is subjected to the WET extraction
procedure for STLC analysis. This is colloquially referred to as the "rule of thumb" test. The
TCLP test' was run if the TTLC was greater than 20 times the TCLP threshold value. STLC
and TCLP values are then checked for extreme values, as outlined is steps one through
four.
6. The data set for each analyte are then evaluated to determine whether sufficient samples
have been collected to constitute a statistically valid determination of characteristic. As a
first check, the "N" number is calculated using the methods specified in SW 846.
0:~97231300.dOC 18
7. If the N number is greater than or equal to the number of sample results, no further
sampling is required. Proceed to step 11.
8. If N is greater than the number of sample results, evaluate whether additional sample
collection is viable or whether other statistical data validity tests recommended in EPA
GND-9 should be used. As applied to this project, if calculated N values were greater than
30, other statistical methods were used
9. If EPA GND-9 tests are used, first determine whether the data set is normally distributed
using DATAQUEST; If normally distributed, apply the One Sample t Test. If the data set is
not n(frmally distributed, apply the Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test.
10. After applying the appropriate test, vedfy whether the null hypothesis prevails at the 5
percent confidence level. (The model allows either a 1 percent of a 5 percent confidence
level. The 5 percent confidence level was thought to be more conservative.) If the null
hypothesis prevails, no further sampling is required. If it does not, more samples must be
collected.
11. Once the data set has been verified following the above steps, a determination is made as
to whether the waste is characteristically hazardous as a result of this particular constituent
of concern. Following SW 846 recommendations, the waste is characteristically hazardous
only if the 80% UCI is greater than or equal to the regulatory threshold criterion.
4.4 (e) Discussion of Results_
4.4.1 Oil Phase
All TTLC metal analytical results in the oil phase were below the Title 22 hazardous waste
threshold criteria. Table I contains a summary of the Title'22 metals results.
A statistical outlier test, known as the Dixon's test for outliers, was used to determine whether
any of the analytical data met the criteria of being an outlier. One statistical outlier was
identified for mercury. The outlier is shown in bold italics on Table 1 and is summarized with
other outliers from the other phases in Table 2. A review of this data indicates that the outlier
data point was the only detected value out of eight samples (the other seven samples were
reported as "non-detect" by the laboratory). It was concluded that this value should not be
rejected on a scientific basis since it is an actual detected constituent and is being compared to
'assumed" values calculated at one-half the detection limit. The mean, standard deviation, and
the 80% UCI were then calculated for all constituents of concern. At the 80% UCI, no analytical
result exceeded the regulatory threshold for TTLC. Table 3 contains the statistical calculations
for this determination.
The rule of thumb test was applied to compare the 'I-tLC 80 UCI value to. 10 times the
corresponding STLC values. No exceedance was observed for the metal analyses, indicating
that all the samples would pass the STLC criteria, if analyzed. No sample was analyzed for
STLC.
The rule of thumb test was applied to compare the 'I-I'LC 80% UCI value to 20 times the
corresponding federal TCLP values. No exceedance was observed for metal analyses,
indicating that all the metal samples would pass the TCLP criteria, if analyzed. No sample was
analyzed for TCLP.
g:~97231300.doc
No organic constituent analytical results exceeded the Title. 22 regulatory threshold criteria.
Organic constituent analytical results (80% UCl) indicated that TCLP analyses were needed for
and benzene. TCLP sample analytical results were below the regulatory threshold cdteria for
hazardous waste. Table 4 presents a summary of analytical results for detected organics. No
outliers were identified in the organic data sets. The 80% UCI for benzene and 1,2-
dichloroethane were also below the regulatory hazardous waste cdteda thresholds. Table 5
contains the statistical calculations for the organic cdteria determination..
Similarly, the oil phase did not exhibit reactivity or corrosivity characteristics., and passed the
fish bioassay test. The oil does exhibit flashpoint results below 140°F (see table 4). However,
since the oil phase is being recycled (see Work Plan), it is exempt from classification as a waste
for this characteristic under the provisions of Title 22, CCR 25143.2.
Finally, the N number was calculated for each constituent of concern using the SW 846
protocols to evaluate whether the data set was statistically valid. The results of this calculation
indicate that a sufficient number of samples were collected and analyzed.
Based upon the above analytical results, the oil phase does not exhibit any hazardous waste
characteristics
.4.4.2 Water Phase
All 'I-I'LC metal analytical results in the water phase were below the Title 22 hazardous waste
threshold criteria. Table 6 contains a summary of the water phase Title 22 metal results.
Based upon total chromium results in the 0.32 to 11.9 range, hexavalent chromium samples
were collected and analyzed.
^ statistical outlier test, known as the "Dixon's Test for Outliers," was used to determine
whether any of the ']'TLC analytical data met the criteria of being an outlier. Outliers were
identified for the barium and hexavalent chromium data sets only. The outliers are shown in
bold italics on Table 6 and summarized in Table 2.
A review of the barium data set indicates that the 29.5 mg/kg value is an order of magnitude
greater than any other value. No scientific basis was identified to reject the data point, so it was
retained in the data set. The mean, standard deviation, and 80% UCl were calculated for the
badum data set with and without the outlier datum. The 80% UCl is below the hazardous waste
threshold cdteda in either case (see Table 7).
The hexavalent chromium data set shows two non-detect results and one actual value. As
previously discussed in the oil phase analytical results, it was concluded that this value should
not be rejected, since it is an actual detected constituent that is being compared to "assumed"
values calculated at one-half the detection limit. The mean, standard deviation, and the 80%
UCl were calculated for hexavalent chromium with and without the outlier value. The 80% UCl
is below the regulatory threshold criteria in either case.
For the remaining TTLC constituents of concern, no metal analytes exceeded the 'I-tLC
regulatory threshold at the 80% UCI.
The rule of thumb test was applied to compare the TTLC upper 80% UCl value to 10 times the
corresponding STLC values. No exceedance was observed for the metal analyses indicating
that all the samples would pass the STLC criteria, if analyzed.
~:~7~3oo.~ 20
The rule of thumb test was applied to compare the 'I-i'LC 80% UCl value to 20 times the
corresponding federal TCLP values. No exceedance was observed for all metal analyses,
indicating that all the samples would pass the TCLP criteria, if analyzed.
Organic constituents detected in the water phase are summarized in Table 8. No organic
constituent analyses exceeded the Title 22 threshold criteria. No outliers were identified in the
water phase organic data set. At the 80% UCI, benzene and the detected Title 22 organics
were below the regulatory threshold criteria. Table 9 presents statistical Calculations for the
water phase organic results.
The 80% UCI value for total benzene was compared to 20 times the corresponding federal
TCLP value. The comparison indicates that the water phase would not exceed the TCLP
cdteda. Nonetheless, TCLP analyses were run and no exceedance of the TCLP criteria for
benzene in the oil phase was observed. Since the 1,2-dichloroethane results were not
requested nor indicated as a constituent of concern, no attempt was made to run a statistical
analysis on this constituent. The results are compiled in Table 8 for reference.
The water phase did not exhibit reactivity, ignitability, or corrosivity characteristics, and passed
the fish bioassay (see Table 8).
Finally, the N number was calculated for all constituents of concern to evaluate whether the
data set was statistically valid. The results of this calculation indicate that a sufficient number of
samples were collected and analyzed for all constituents except hexavalent chromium. As
stated eadier, N was not evaluated for 1,2-dichloroethane, as it was not a constituent of
concern. Due to laboratory error, only three samples were analyzed for hexavalent chromium.
An additional sample has been collected and analytical results are pending. However, in
reviewing the concentrations of hexavalent and total chromium in the water phase, it is not likely
that this phase will be determined to be characteristically hazardous due to the extremely Iow
levels in the three existing samples. The additional data will be added to this report when it is
available.
Analytical data collected to satisfy City requirements are presented in Table 8 as an aside and
do not affect hazardous waste criteria determinations.
Based upon the above analytical results and data analysis, the water phase is not a
characteristically hazardous waste.
4.4,3 .Solid/Sludge Phase
All TTLC analytical results in the solid/sludge phase were below the Title 22 hazardous waste
threshold criteria. Table 10 contains a summary of the Title 22 metals results.
The Dixon statistical outlier test was used to determine whether any of the TTLC analytical data
met the criteria of being a statistical outlier. No TTLC statistical outliers were identified. The
mean, standard deviation, and the upper 80% UCl were then calculated for all TTLC
constituents of concern. At the upper 80% UCI, no analytical result exceeded the regulatory
threshold for 'I-i'LC. Table 11 presents statistical calculations for sludge metal threshOld criteria
The rule of thumb test was applied to compare the TTLC upper 80% UCl value to 10 times the
corresponding STLC values. The lead T'I'LC upper 80% UCI value of 158 rog/kg is greater than
10 times the 5 mg/i STLC lead threshold criterion. Therefore, STLC lead samples were
g:xg7231300.doc 21
analyzed. The 80% UCI values for all other metals were below the levels where STLC analysis
was indicated (rule of thumb test), which indicates that no exceedances of other STLC criteria
would be expected if the samples were analyzed. No further STLC analysis was done.
In a similar manner, the 'I-TLC 80% UCI levels were compared to 20 times the TCLP threshold
criteria for applicable metals. Based upon this test, TCLP chromium and lead analyses were
.required. Samples were collected and analyzed for this criterion. Data results for STLC and
TCLP metal analyses are contained in Table 10.
The Dixon's statistical outlier test was used to determine whether any of the STLC or TCLP
analytical data met the criteria of being a statistical outlier. One soluble lead datum and one
TCLP chromium datum were identified as statistical outliers. These data are shown in bold on
Table 10 and are summarized in Table 2.
The STLC lead statistical outlier value was over.twice the mean of the eight data points at 9.2
mg/I. The datum was collected in 1991 by DTSC. Following EPA GND-9 recommendations,
the 1991 DTSC HML data set and analytical procedures were reviewed to determine whether
there was scientific basis to reject this datum. Based upon internal correspondence from
Region 1 to Mr. Brad Parsons, Senior Hazardous Materials Specialist, dated November 22
1991, and from Technical Suppod Services Branch to Bruce Butterfield, Associate Hazardous '
Materials Specialist, dated 11 December 1991 (see history section of this report and Appendix
A), there is supporting scientific evidence that the 9.2 STLC lead value is a true outlier. The 11
December 1991 correspondence specifically recommends reanalysis for WET lead, and further
notes that large discrepancies exist between split samples analyzed by DTSC HML and BC
'Laboratories.
The mean, standard deviation and 80% UCI were calculated for STLC lead with and without the
outlier value. Results are summarized in Table 11. The STLC lead 80% UCI is below the Title
22 threshold value for lead with the outlier removed (4.17 mg/I UCI compared to 5 mg/I
threshold). The STLC lead 80% UCI with the outlier included in the data set is 5.27 mg/I, which
is just slightly over the STLC lead hazardous waste threshold criterion. Based upon statistical
and scientific evidence, it was decided to remove the outlier datum and rely upon the outlier
removed data set for purposes of waste characteristic determination. By this analysis, the
material is not characteristically hazardous due to STLC lead. Irrespective of this non-
hazardous determination, Kennedy/Jenks intends to characterize the initial loads of actual
solidified matedal removed from Tank 50001 prior to disposal to landfill (see the document
entitled "Work Plan, Sparks Estate Property, 50-000-Barrel Tank Content Removal and
Demolition," furnished under separate cover). Additional characterization of actual disposed
solids is required to meet landfill acceptance criteria in any event. This characterization will
include STLC lead. If there is a change in waste characteristic measured at the time of landfill
profiling, the waste will be managed accordingly.
The TCLP Chromium statistical outlier value was the only sample of five in which TCLP
chromium was detected. No scientific reason indicates that the datum is an outlier. The mean,
standard deviation and 80% UCI were calculated for the TCLP chromium data set with and
without the outlier datum. The 80% UCI in both cases indicates that the sludge phase is not
characteristically hazardous due to TCLP chromium. Based upon this analysis, there is no
reason to remove the statistical outlier datum. These calculations are summarized in Table 11.
g:~7231300.dOC 22
No ~)rganic constituent analytical result exceeded the Title 22 regulatory threshold cdteda.
Table 12 contains a summary of solids/sludge phase organic constituent analytical data.
Dixon's test for outliers showed that no statistical outliers were present in the sludge organic
data set. The mean, standard deviation and 80% UCI were calculated for organic constituents.
These results are contained in Table 13. No 80% UCI values exceeded the Title 22 threshold
criteda for hazardous waste
When the upper 80% UCI for organics was compared with 20 times the TCLP, benzene
analysis for TCLP was required. Samples were analyzed for TCLP benzene. Using these
recent samples along-with data from analyses collected in December 1993, the data set was
checked for outliers. No outlier data were identified. The mean, standard deviation and 80%
UCl were calculated. These results are contained in Table 13. The sludge/solids TCLP
benzene 80% UCI value is 0.53 mg/I, just slightly above 0.5 mg/I hazardous waste regulatory
threshold.
It should be noted that the Kennedy/Jenks benzene TCLP samples collected in the fall of 1997
contained significantly less TCLP benzene than the samples collected in December 1993. It is
interesting to note that the Kennedy/Jenks data set, analyzed without the 1993 data collected
by others, indicates that the sludge is not hazardous for TCLP benzene. No datum exceeded
the threshold, nor did an 80% UCI done on Kennedy/Jenks data only. It is believed that there
has been a physical change in the waste during the four to five years between sampling, and
that the data collected in 1997 is representative of current conditions, which is that the waste is
non-hazardous for TCLP benzene. Nonetheless, it is understood that SW 846 and EPA GA/D-
9 do not contain mechanisms to allow removal of outdated data. Therefore, we have opted to
collect additional sludge TCLP benzene samples and will transmit an update to this
determination when the data is available.
The sludge solid phase did not exhibit the characteristic of c°rrosivity or reactivity, and passed
the fish bioassay test for toxicity. As explained earlier, reliable tests for measuring the
ignitability characteristic have not yet been devised and approved by EPA. Ignitiability data
collected for the sludge/solid phase were, therefore, collected as an indicator for field
management operations, not as an indicator of hazardous characteristic. These data are'
presented in Table 12.
N numbers were calculated to evaluate whether all constituents of concem data were
statistically valid. The results of this calculation indicate that a sufficient number of samples
were collected and analyzed for all metals except for barium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc.
The N number indicated that significantly more samples should be run for these five metals
because of the large standard deviation of the data. Calculated N values ranged from 21 to
4,217, which were determined to be infeasible and impractical. Collection of the number of
samples suggested by this calculation is not required if the data set can be shown to be
statistically valid using other EPA-approved statistical methods. Therefore, an alternative
statistical procedure was used to confirm the validity of the data set.
The EPA statistical model DATAQUEST was used to determine whether the data
accummulated to date was statistically valid. For the five data sets, the data was first tested for
normality using the Shapiro-Wilk Test (the W Test). All five data sets were indicated to have
normally distributed data. Next, each data set was subjected to the One Sample t-Test along
with the null hypothesis that the mean of the data set does not exceed the regulatory threshold
for that data set. Calculated t.values versus table t values were obtained, and the results
indicated that the null hypothesis can not be rejected. Therefore, the conclusion that can be
drawn is that the data set does indicate the mean will not exceed the regulatory threshold.
Note: All data values are significantly lower than the regulatory threshold limit.
As a side note, a sample collected on 15 October 1991 was analyzed for organic lead. This
sample indicated a concentration of 4.6 mg/kg of organic lead. The sample analytical result is
below the TTLC hazardous waste threshold criteria for organic persistent and bioaccumulative
toxic substances (organic lead 13 rog/kg, as lead), and there appears to be no reason to further
analyze for this constituent.
In summary, the sludge/solid phase does not exhibit hazardous waste characteristics, with the
possible exception of TCLP benzene. Additional analytical information is pending for this
constituent of concern. VVhen the data is available, a supplement to this determination will be
issued.
4;5 (f) Mitigating Factors:
The purpose of this section is to identify mitigating factors that may exist to assist in
determining whether the waste poses a threat to human health and the environment. No
unique or inherent properties of these materials that make them less hazardous to human
health or the environment were identified. However, the removal of these materials .from this
abandoned tank and their subsequent proper management will lead to the elimination of a
potential threat of a future problem arising at this site.
g:~97231300.doc ~
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based upon research of DTSC files, KCEHSD files, CV RWQCB files, and interviews with Mr.
Darrell Sparks and his attorney, no record has been located that shows RCRA-listed waste was
placed in Tank 50001. In the absence of such information, Retail Investors, Inc., proposes to
manage the tank contents in accordance with its characteristic testing. '~
Based on review of the laboratory analysis results of samples collected by Kennedy/Jenks in
the fall of 1997, and review of historical samples collected by others, including the DTSC in
combination with Kennedy/Jenks' data, it appears that the various phases of material in Tank
50001 are not characteristically hazardous wastes underthe criteda found in Title 22, Article 4
of CCR, with the possible exception of TCLP benzene. Additional TCLP benzene analytical
results are pending, at which time a supplement to this report will be issued. Kennedy/Jenks
further believes that because of the proposed waste management practices to be used, the
waste will pose an insignificant hazard to human health and safety.
g:~97231300.doc 25
TABLES
· .lr
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
OIL PHASE. TITLE 22 METALS
' ' KENNEOY/JENKS SAMPLES ~-- " HIS".TORIC SAMPLES "'
CONSTITUENTS ' Oct(~er 19~7 December 1997 Oil' Analysi~ ' ' T-1 (sudace) ~-2 (su~ace) BC Lab Sample I~IML Lab Sample
972313-17'-01 972313-'16-21._P?.23,30 972313-16.25-24,25~26,3~) 972313-16.5-27,28,29~33 972313-17-34, 31 5-Jan-89 30-Dec-93 ~'30-De~:-93 15-OctL91 15-Oct-91
Total Metals Value Units Value Units Value Units Value Units. Value Units Value UNits Value Units V,~iue Units 0-3' level 0-~' level
.... i?i~i:~!:~.i~:!!~ .. 5 rog/kg 3.8 mg/kg 3.8 mg/kg 5 mg/kg ~:!:??i:?:.!i?~!ii~'~
5 mg/kg 5 rog/kg 5 mg/kg 5 mg/kg' ;~ :: ;!:;i;~:i,~i~;.:;~::: .i;':?~:~?~.i:'! '" ' '
Antim°ny
Arsenic 5.2 , mg/kg 5.4 rog/kg 4.4 mg/kg 4.7 rog/kg ' %.i::¥;.'!?:;!!~;:ii:~;:::!:!~! '0'.5 mg/kg. , 215 mg/kg 2.3, mg/kg 8.9 mg/kg 1.76 mg/k9
Barium 39 rog/kg, 41 mg/kg 40 mg/kg 41 mg/k9 i?.i: i i: iliil iiCi;ii!fill iii~i~iiill '4.58 mg/kg 28 rog/kg ~ mg/kg 25 mg/kg '19 mg/kg ,.
Beryllium 0.5 mg/kg 0.5 rog/kg 0.5 mg/k.g. 0.5 m.g .~g 0.5 mg/kg 0.1 mg~kg 0!1 ~ mg/~g 0.5 mg/kg . 0.01 mg/kg
Cadmium 0.5 rog/kg 0.5 rog/kg 0.5 mg~g 0.5 mg/kg i~;:i;:?~!;?.~?~:~!!i~;;~i!~?!~ ii~ 0'5 mg./kg ,,, I mg/kg ~ , mg/kg '0.5 rog/kg 0:64 mg/k9
Chromium 90 mg/kg 98 mg/kg 92 mg/kg 91 mg/kg !i:~:i?~i?.i?ii??:~!i~!'ili~ ~:~i~:::~??. 5.87 mg/kg 71 ~/kg - 6~7 ~mg~kg 47 "rog/kg , 31.4 .
Total Hexa~alent Chromium 0.5 mg/kg 0.5 rog/kg 0.5 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg ::~ '~;~::iii!~:!:: ~: ? :i~;i!iii~:i~!i~!~;~- ?i~;iii!:~:~i;i!:~?~!ili ~ ~: ~'~'~;~::~ ~':~' ~:~:~:..::~:~:~ ~ ~.~?~?~;~ii ~iiii:~i ~iii~ :~?~:~?~:~
Cobalt 2.5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 2,5 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg i,;~;~!:~.;i:ii~i!~!~!i!~.~:~!i;~:i:ii ~:~.~.:~.~:::~;:~.~'~:~:~:~"~; 2.5 rog/kg 2.0 rog/kg 116 mg/kg 2.5 rog/kg 0.59 mg/kg
Copper' 32 mg/kg · 35 mg/kg 34 mg/kg ' 34 rog/kg ii~,~%i~;~:[~';;~!!~ ~':~;~ 18.7 mg/kg 32 rog/kg 3p mg/kg 23 mg/kg 14.5 mg/kg
~ ~d 45 mg/kg 47 mg/kg 43 rog/kg 43 mg/kg ~;;;~?~:~i:~!~i;;:;~ >J~!~:~ 2.5 rog/kg 38 mg/kg 3~, mg/kg 33 rog/kg 21.2 mg/kg
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 rog/kg 0.1' mg/kg. 0.1 mg/kg ~!~;ii!~;~:~:~;~~.~!~!?~,~ 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 rog/kg 0!1 mg/kg 0~6 rog~kg .... ,~.~.~:~'~'~¢~":~::::~'~
Molybdenum 2.5 mg/kg 2.5 rog/kg 2.5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg ~?:~:'~::~::~'~:~:~ ~;~;~,;;~i~i 2.5 mg/kg 1.3 rog/kg 2.~ mg/kg 2.5 rog/kg 1.32 mg~g
Nickel 47 mg/kg 51 rog/kg 46 mg/kg 48' 5.93 mg/kg 36 mg/kg 32 , mg,/kg 23 rog/kg '"15.3 mg/kg
:;~¥;:'¥; :;;:':::~::~" !~;;?~ ~ 3.i mg/kg 0.5 rog/kg 0.4 mg/kg
Selenium 5.1 mg/kg 3.9 rog/kg 4.1 mg/kg 4.3 mg/kg ~:.~: ~ ~ ~?~,:~..~.~:~:,~ ~ .~:~ ~:+~:~,~ ~ ~..~. ~:~[~i~;~ ~:~.~.~.~:.~, 0.5 mg/kg 0.1 mg/kg .................
Silver 1 mg/kg. 1 mg/kg '1 rog/kg 1 mg/kg ~:;::~:%~?¥?:~ ~;!~i~:~: 0.5 rog/kg 0.8 rog/kg .0.B mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg :'~i~:~i;!~i
Thaflium 5 mg/kg 5 mg/kg 5 mg/kg 5 mg/kg ~! !ii~i;i;;'~i;!iii~! ~. ~.~;.~:;ii~'~ ~;'~E~:~'~ :~ 5 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 10 mg~kg 5 rog/kg 0.75 mg/kg
vanadium 72 mg/kg 77 rog/kg 73 rog/kg 73 mg/kg ~:~:~ ~.~;~:~:~:~ ;~;CV~ ~;;~ ~ 3.49 mg/kg 48 rog/kg 44 mg/kg 34 mg/kg 21.9 mg/kg
Soluble Metals
..... .~?;~;~.~: 4.3
Lead (STLC) ~~ :" ~ ............. '~
TCLP Me[als
chromium ('rCLPi ~ ~ 0.05 mg/I 0.05 m9/I 0.05...mg/I ' 0.05 mg/I ' .' ~ ~:~;~:~ ~~ ~:'~ ........... ' ~ ~ :~>~':~::~
Notes:
For constituents that were not detected, 1/2 the detection limit is shown. I':~i,i;~ ~.' = Not Analyzed
Outliers are presented in bold and Italics.
Heights are measured from the bottom of the tank.
Samples 972313-17'-02 and 972313-4'-08 were not analyzed.
'
O-METALB.XLS Page t
3112/98
10:07 AM
TABLE 2
DIXON'S TEST FOR OUTLIERS
SHAPIRO-WILK(2) TEST FOR NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
OIL PHASE DATA POINTS(~) CALCULATED TABLE RESULT
Mercury, Total (mg/kg) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.050 0.730 Non-Normality
0.1 0.1 0.1 ~
Barium, Total (mg/kg) 0.42 0.44 0.5 0.4 0.666 0.698 Normal
~ 5.2 2.01
Hexavalent Chromium, Total (mg/kg) 0.005 ~[0,[~! 0.005 Sample Size Too Small
Lead, Soluble (mg/I) 5.1 4.0 2.33.3 0.980 0.730 Normal
3.4 4.2 4.5~
IIIII
Notes:
[~) Outlier according to EPA DATAQUEST Model is shaded.
(2) Shapiro-Wilk Test for Normally Distributed Data after outlier value removed from data set.
(3) BC Laboratories, 15 October 1991.
(4) Cai Western Fuels, 5 January 1989.
Is) Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, October 1997.
is) DTSC HML Laboratory, 15 October 1991.
3/12/98
OUTLIER.XLS Page 1 2:25 PM
TABLE 3
SUMI~IARy OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
OIL PtlASE- TITLE 22 METALS
~ TICAI: ANALYSIS IERS
CONSTITUENT STATISTICAL ,ANALYSIS (ALL DATA) STATIS , (WITHOUT OUTL )
STLC 10x TI'LC AcI. No. of Sample ' 1-value UpperS0% CaJc. Noof Above'II'LC Ab<wel0x NeedMom AlLeasl Acl. No. of Sample l-val~, UpperSO% CaJc. Noof AboveTTLC Abovol0x NeedM<xe AtLea~
Total Metala Threshold STLC ~reshold ~ Samples Mean Ve~noe Std. Dev. Std. Erro~ (n-l) Conf. Emit Samples Limit? STLC Emit? Samples ? 4 Samples ? Samples mea~ Variance SId. Dev. Sld. Erro~ (n-l! Conf. Emit Samples Emit? STLC Emil? ~ ? 4 Saml31es ?
Anlim~ 15.0 150.0 500 8 4.70E-~00 3.09E-01 5.55E-01 1.96E-01 1.415 4.978 t no no no . )~s . 8 4.70E+00 3.09E-01 5.55E-01 1.g6E-01 1.41,5 4.978 1 no no no
A~erdc 5.0 50.0 500 9 3.74E~00 4.28E+O0 2.07E+0d 6.90E-01 1.397 4.704 1 no no no yes 9 3.74E+00 4.28E+00 2.07E+0016.90E-01 1.39.7 4.704 1 no no no
Ba~um 100.0 1000.0 10000 9 2.95E+01 1.53E+02 1.24E+01 4.12E+(X) 1.397 352~. ~ no no no .. )~es 9 2.95E+01 1.53E+(~2 1.24E+01 4.12E-~0 1.39.7 35262 1 no no no
Be~Jm 0.8 7.5 75 9 3.57E-01 4.69E-02 2.17E-01 7.22E-02 1.397 0.458 I no no no )~es 9 3.57E-01 4.69E-02 2.17E-01 7.22E-O2 1.397 0.458 I no no no yes
Cadmium 1.0 10.0 100 9 6.27E-01 4.69E-02 2.17E-01 7.~E-02 1.397 0.728 I no no no yes 9 6.27E-01 4.69E-02 2.17E-01 7.22E-02 1.397 0.728 1 no no no
Ch~m~ium 5~0.0 5600.0 2500 9 6.59E~O1 1.01E+03 3.18E+01 1.06E~01 1.397 80.737 t no m no yes 9 6.59E~O1 1.01E+03 3.18E+01 , 1.06E+01 11:.~ 80.737 I no no no yes
Total Hesaval~l Chromium 5.0 50.0 500 5 5.00E-01 0.00E+O0 0.00E+00 O.00E~00 1.533 0.500 I no no no yes 5 5.00E-01 0.00E~:X) 0.00~0 ' 0.00E~X) .. 0.500 1 no no no
Cobalt 80.0 800.0 8000 9 2.13E+00 4.36E-01 6.61E-01 2.20E.01 1.397 2.440 I no no no yes 9 2.13E+00 4.36E-01 6.61E-01 2.20E-01 1.397, 2.440 1 no no no yes
1.."~ 31.628 no
~ 25.0 250.0 2500 9 2.81E+01 5.63E+01 7.50E+00 2.50E,~00 1.397 31.628 i no no no )~es 9 2.81E+01 5.63E+01 7.50~E~00 2.50E.H30 1 no no )'es
lead 5.0 50.0 1000 9 3.42E~01 2.03E+02 1.43E+01 4,75E,H~O 1,397 40,827 I no no no yes 9 3.42E+01 2.03E.~02 1.43E+01 4.75E+00 1.3 40.827 1 no nc~ no yes
Mercury 02 2.0 20 8 120E-01 3.20E-03 5.66E-0,2 2.00E-02 1.415 0.148 I no no no yes 7 1,00E-01 2.31E-1~ 1.52E-09 5.75E-10 1.440 0,100 1 no no no yes
Moi)4~ 350.0 35(X).0 3500 9 2.26E+00 2.93E-01 5.41E-01 1.80E-01 1.397 2,510 I no no no yes 9 12.28E-HX) 2.93E-01 , 5.41E-01 1.80E-01 1.39~ 2,510 1 no no no yes.
Nickel 20.0 200.0 2000 9 3.38E+01 2.58E+02 1.61E+01 5.35E+00' 1.397 41.284 I no no no yes 9 13.38E+01 2.58E+(~ 1.61E-H)1 5.35E.H)O 1,397 412~4 1 no no no yes
: ,Se~mium 1.0 10.0 100 9 2.11E+00 4.87E+00 2.21E*00 7.35E-01 1.415 3,151 I no no no yes 9 2.11E+00 4.87E+00 2.21E.HX) 7.35E-01 1.4'~5 3.151 1 no no no yes
Silver 5.0 50.0 500 8 7.63E-01 4.79E-02 2.19E-01 7.73E-02 1.415 0.872 t no no no yes 8 7.63E-01 4.79E-~. 2.19E-01 7.73E-02 1.415 0.872 I no no ,, , no yes
ThaJlium 7.0 70.0 700 9 5.64E-~0 6.05E.~30 2.84E+00 9.46E-01 1.397 6.960 t no no no ye~ 9 !5.64E+00 8.05EEO0 2.84E+00 9.46E-01 1.397 6.960 1 no no no yes
Vanadium 24.0 240.0 2400 9 4.g6E+01 6.90E+02 2.63E+01 8.75E-H:)O 1,397 61,829 I no no no )~s 9 4.96E+01 6.90E+02 2.63E+01 8.75E+(X) 1.397 61.829 I no no no yes
Zinc 250.0 2500.0 5000 9 1.94E+02 3.14E+03 5.60E-~01 1.87E.~01 1.397 220.387 I no no no yes 9 1.94E+02 3.14E+03 5.60E"0t 1.87E+01 1.397, 220.387 I no no no yes
III
5oluble Metals
Lead (STLC, 5'0 INANANA I 4 I 1.00E I I 3'55E~O0[ 2'70E~)1 I 5'20E~1 ' 2'60E'01 '0.mE+O0 I o. OOE+OO[ 0.00E~OI 1.6..'~1'638I ' 3'976 ' I t0.001 1 NANA r NA I noNA no ]~s 44 I 3'55E+00] 2'70E~1 ' 520E'01 ' 2'60E~1 '1.00E-03I 0.00EH)0 I 0.00E~01 0.00E~3011.6381'638I0.0013'976 11INANA INA ! no I YeSNA no
.. lS LOI
TCLP Metala
Chromium ('rCLP) Lead (TCLP) NANA I NA'NA 05.5 [44 - ] 5'00E'02 1 0*00E+°O I 0'OOE+O01 0'00E+0012.50E-01 O.OOE+OO i o.ooE+ool 0.00E.0Ot 1.6381'~8Io25o°'°50 [ I I NA [ NA I no1 NA NA no ~la~ 44 I 5'00E~2 [ 0'00E+00 I 0'00E~0[ 0*00E*OOI2.50E-0110.OOE+O0 0.00E~01 O.OOE~O0111'6381.638 02500'050 [ I I NA I NA I no I yes1 NA NA no
Notes:
Fo~ conslfluents Ihal were not detected, 1/2 of the detection limit was used.
NA = not a~plicabte
O-METALB.XLS Pa9e ! ~
3/12f~8
2:55 PM
TABLE $
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
OIL PHASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CONSTITUENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Act. No. of TCLP Sample Variance Std Dev. Std Error t-value Upper Above Calc, No. Need More At Least
Total Organics Samples (rog/L) mean (n-l) Conf. Limit TCLP Limit? Samples Saml~le's? ';¢ Samples
Benzene 9 :~'=~!: ;',:! ,i~i,,i~i~,! i~'~ 2.16E+01 9.56E+02 3,09E+01 1.03E+01 1.397 35.987
1.2-Dichloroethane 5 ;: ~:: ~k~¢;~ ~¢~(~?~ 6.90E+00 1.88E+01 4.34E+00 1.94E+00, 1.533 9.873 ~~ ~~ ~?~/~ t~:!?, yes
Ethyl benzene 8 ;,:~;::;,~.~¢~ 2.66E+02 3.19E+04 1.79E+02 6.32E+01 1.415 ,, 355,754 ~ ~~ ~'~ yes
Toluene 9 ~(~ 3.55E+02 5.75E+04 2.40E+02 7.99E+01 1.397 466.939 ~ ~¢,,~~¢ :~~+ yes
.~ .~:~ 1.65E+03 1,12E+06 1.06E+03 3.52E+02 1.397 2142.004 ~~~' ~ ~ ~'' ~~~"~"~'~ ~ '~~~ yes
Chlorinated Pesticides/PCB 4 ~;5~ 3.00E+O0 6.67E-01 8.16E-01 4.08E-01 1.638 3.669 ~~ ~] ~~~ yes
I
TCLP Organics
Benzene (TCLP) 5 0.5 5.44E-02 6.63E-04 2.58E-02 1.15E-02 1.533 0.072 no 0.0 no yeb'
1.2-Dichloroethane (TCLP) 3 0.5 5.00E-03 6.78E-21 8,23E-11 4.75E-11 1.886 0.005 no 0.0 no no
Other
I
Notes:
For values when ND = Not Detected; 1/2 the detection limit ~as used. ~ = Not Appli~ble
O-ORGB,XLS
3112/98
Page 1 3:36 PM
CONSTITUENT
Total Organics
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Eth, benzene
Sep-97
Toluene
TCLP
le
Other
Rash Point
Reactive Sulfide
Reactive Cyanide
972313-17'-01
Value
10
10
34O
340
2200
1100
972313-16-21,22,23,30
Value Units Value Units
6.1 7.5
I 3.5
340 270
340 26O
2000 1900
4 3
0.032
0.005
._pH 5.5 4.56
Fish Bioassa Passed
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
OIL PHASE. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
KENNEDY/JENKS SA M P-~'~"~
December 1997 Sample Results
972313-16.25-24,25,26 972313-16.5-27,28,29,33 :-17-34
Value Units
10
10
3 .2
0.038 0.037
0.005 mg/l 0.005 mg/I
Non-Reactiv
4.45 4.33
Passed Passed
9-Jan-89
Passed.
Oil
Value
113.6
30-Dec-93
30
BC Lab Sample
15-Oct-91
0-3' Layer
15-Oct-91
0-3' layer
7OO
3370
Notes:
For contituents that were not detected, 1/2 the detection limit is shown.
Outlers are presented in bold and Italics.
Heights are measured from the bottom of the tank.
Samples 972313-17'-02 and 972313-4'-08 were not analyzed.
Not Analyzed
O-ORGB.XLS
Page I 3/12/98
2:36 PM
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
WATER PHASE - TITLE 22 METALS
KENI~EDY/JENKS sAMPLE I~ESU'LTS I HISTORIC SAMPLE RESULTS
CONSTITUENT October 1997' Sample Resulls No{/ember 1997 Sample Results December 1997 'S.'ample Results Oil/Water Cai Western Fuels BC Sample HMLiSample
9723'13-15'-03 972313-12'-04 972313-12-07 972313-i0-08 ' 972313-09-11,!6 972313-10.5-12,17 972313-11-13, 20 972313-11.5-14,19 ' ~/20/88 ' 5-Jan-89 15-Oct-~1' 15-Oct-91
Total Metals Value ' Units "Value Units Value Units Value Units "~/alue Units Value Units ~/alue Units Value Units . Valu~ Units ' value Units 3:6' sample 3-6' sample
I I ill I I I II I I ' II I I I I
Soluble Me~ls
I I IIII I III I I I I II m'l IIII I I I i I
TCLP Metals
N0les:
For constituents lhat were nol detect~, 1/2 lhe det~tion limit is shown. ~] '= Not Anal~
O~liers are presenl~ in ~ld and
Heights are measur~ ~rom the ~om of the tank.
Did not correcl for mg/L versus mg~g. Sp~ific gravity was 1.014,
Samples 972313-17'-02 and 97~ ~ 3-4'-08 were not analyze.
3/12/98
W-METALB.XLS Page 1
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF ~ 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
WATER PHASE · TITLE 22 METALS
CONSTITUENT
Total Metals
Antimony
· Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Total Hexavaleni Chromium
Cobalt
Lead
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vana(~um
zinc
Soluble Metals
An~mony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Niche!
selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
TCLP Metals
Chromium ~
Lead 2
Act. No. ot
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
7
7
7
5
7
8
7
6
7
8
8
Notes:·
F~' constituents that were not detected, 112 of the detection limit was used.
Variance
6.14E+00
4.62E-02
1,15E+02
6.10E-02
9.15E-02
2.21E+01
8.25E-02
1.50E+00
2.46E+01
1.97E+01
1.68E-03
1.48E+00
4.94E+00
5.29E-02
1.30E-01
5.63E+00
3.52E+00
2,09E+03
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Upper 80% Above TTLC Above lox
Conf. Umlt Limit? STLC Umlt?
3.706 0 no no
0,394 0 no no
11.336 0 no no
0,371 0 no no
0,516 0 no no
6,102 0 no no
0.481 0 no no
1,859 0 no no
5,712 0 no no
5,815 0 no no no
0,055 0 no no
1.862 0 no no
3,423 0 no no
0.418 0 no no
0.600 0 no no
3.756 0 no no
2,618 0 no no
49.777 0 no no,
0.00E+00 0.001 0 no
0.00E+00
Need More At Least
yes
Not Applicable
0.250 0
Variance
6.14E+00
4.62E-02
3.69E+00
6.10E-02
9.15E-02
2.21E+01
1.25E-05
1.50E+00
2.46E+01
1.97E+01
1.68E-03
1.48E+00
4.94E+00
5.29E-02
1.30E-01
5.63E+00
3.52E+00
2.09E+03
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Upper 80% Calc. No of Above TI'LC Above 10x Need More
Conf. Limit Limit? STLC Limit?
3.706 0 no no no
0.394 0 no no no
2.653 0 no no no
0.371 0 no no no
0.516 0 no no no
6.102 0 no no no
0.010 0 no no no
1.859 0 no no no
5.712 0 no no no
5.815 0 no
0.055 0 no
!.862 0 no no no
3.423
0.418
0 nc no no
0.600
3.756 0 no no no
2,618 0 no no no
49.777 0 no .no no
0.001 0
0.250 0
W-METALB.XLS
Page I
CONSTITUENT
Total Or~irdci
Benzene
1,2-Dic~;oivethane
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
X~enes
1,2-Oichloroethane
Olher
1997 Results
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
WATER PHASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
KENNEDY~ENKS SAMPLE RESULTS
Re~_cffjve Sul~de
Reactive Cyaride
Flash Point
pH
November 1997 Sample Results
972313-15'-03 972313-12'-04 972313-12-07 972313-10-08
Value Value Value Value
I 0.05 0.14 0.13
I 0.19
4.5 0.94 0.11 0.13
6.6 0.72 0.61 0.66
35.0 9.9 0.64 0.75
0.02 0.02
150.0 470.0
0.29 0.1
0.I 0.1
Non-Reactive
Non-Reactive Non- Reactive
>180 '>180
8.23 8.27
972313-09-1 t,16
Value
0.01 0.01
0.88 0.35
0.16 0.13
December Resulls
972313-11-13, 20 972313-11.5-14,19
Value Value
972313-12-15
Value
O.Ot
0,17 0.15
Non-Reactive
Non-Reactive
8.05
Passed
INotes:
Fo; constituents that were not detected, I/2 the detection limit is shown.
Outliers are presented in bom and Italics.
Heights are measured from the bottom of the tank.
Samples 972313-17-02 and 972313-4'-08 were not analyzed.
= Not Analyzed
W. ORGB.XLS
Page
Oil/Water
9/20/88
HiSTORICSAMPLERESULTS
BC
1~9 15-0cl-91
15-0ct-91
10 5
10
44
90 51
440 166
.I
3/12/98
6:45 PM
TABLE 9
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
WATER PHASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CONSTITUENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Act. No. of TCLP Sample Variance Std Dev. t Value Upper 80% Calc.'No, of Above TCLP Need More At Least
Total Organics Samples Threshold mean n-1 Conf. Limit Samples Limit? Samples? 4 Samples
Benzene 8 ~i~i!i~ 4.29E+00 2.34E+01 14.84E+00 1.415 6.707 ~~.,~
~~j no yes
1,2-Dichloroethane 2 ~ ~ ~''
~~ 5.95E-01 3.28E-01 5.73E-01 3.078 1.842 ~~~;i yes no
Ethyl benzene 7 ~~ 9.80E+00 2.59E+02 1.61E+01 1.440 18.554 ~~~~ no yes
Toluene 8 ~~ 5.09E+01 7.26E+03 8.52E+01 1.415. 93.513 ~~~~ no yes
Xyienes 8 ~~ 1.57E+02 5.10E+04 2.26E+02 1.415 269.800 ~!~~: no , yes
OrganochlorinePesticides/PCB 7 ~~ 1.15E-02 4.58E-05 6.76E-03 1,440 0.015 ~~~ no yes
2-Methylnaphthalene 4 [~[~'~ 1.55E+02 4.90E+04 2.21E+02 1.638 336.551 ~~~~, no yes
I I
TCLP Organics ,
Benzene ~CLP) 6 0.5 1.67E-01 4.27E-03 6.53E-02 1.476 0.206 I no no yes
1,2-Dichloroethane ~CLP) 2 0.5 1.00E-01 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+O0 3.078 0.100 I no no no
I
Other
Notes: ·
For constituents that were not detected, 1/2 the dete~ion limit was used. ~= Not Appli~ble
3/12/98
W-ORGB.XLS Page 1 6:47 PM
$LUOGE ANALYSIS
Total Metals
Antimony
Arsenic
Bapium
Bet~flium
Cadmium
Chromium
Total HexavaJen! Chromium
Nickel
Selenium
Sliver
Thallium
Vanadium
Soluble Metal,,
Antimony
Arsenic
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OFI..A~ORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHASE . TITLE 22 METALS
Oclober 1997 San~o~.. Resulls
KENNE DYIJ ENKS. S AMI:q-E RESULTS
.ovem~ f997 sarape Res. Its I
9~1382~ I 97~1382-10 I 97~13-~,5~351 97~13-~.5-36J 9~13-39-37 [ 97~13-~-~
V~ J Uni~ J V~e J uni~ J 'Va~e J Uni~ J V~ J Un~ J' V~ J Uni~ J Va~e J Uni~
.... · ::~i .~:'l~:.~ I'..~:L.I s Im~gl
· :.:.-:'~:':':l:~;.~::?l~.': I .'~;;'~l 14 Jm~gl
'::.~:~'~'.?:J ~::..:'" ~:'j::'::~:: J :;:~::::~J 0.5 J m~9 J::? :: .... J ~.:: J 0.5 J ~9 J ~ :'.': J :
~?.~?l~-??q ~:~;:::::)::~ d~:~xF'~:~i q~ .. I ~9 I:'::;~:':~: ::~:: I :;'~'::::~:~:~:1 ~.T I ~9 I~::::::; :~::~ I: :~:~"
146 J ~91 ~57 J m~gJ ~1 J ~91,:::::d?1':~?:~% ~ J ~91:~::~.:~:~':;:::1 ~-~:"..~:
5.7
// / /
3-08c-93
T-~ i¥,,d~,
Value J Uni
,3.8 I~
2.8 Imo~
o.~ Imo~
4.2 J~
~ro I~
0.38 I~
8.4 I~
37 I~
0.~ I~
~0 I~
J T-4
I vah~ J
il 3.8 Im9~9
i 3.4 J mg/~g
t J 420 I m~g
lJ 0.1 J m~g
II 52 Jm~9
il ~ Im~9
IJ ~6 J m~g
II l~ Im~
~1 0.73 I ~9
~1 0.8 1~9
57 I m~g
I
HISTORIC SAMPJ'E RE',
· . BC Lab Sample I $-Oc1-91 . '
~u~je(~-9~ ~ studge(~-,2~ I S~ud~e(~'-91 I ~o~oms~u~je J ~u~
v~. I u.. I v,,~o I u.i,j VaJuo I unit I vau~ I uoi, I v~,~ I
5 I mcj/kg I 5 I mg~g J :F?.:.=I ?.!"h,i{. J 5 I mg/~g ji::,~.:;~;.::~! j
5.2 Img/kgl 6.7 Img/kgl-:::~'~:i!,~l:'~::~::?':J 9.7 ling/kg
318 I moJ~g I 43 I II~g I ':~:~:':':' I ::L::!~;;'i;I ,440
o.5 Jma/kgJ o.5 Jmg/k~l ~:?:{~:!1!-::.:~?1 0.$ Img/kgl 0.06 J,
2.8 I m~l~gJ 0.5 I mg/kgJ~?~':!:~l:' ?:':?J 3.6 J mg/kgJ 3.!
97 Im~kgI 63 JmgAgl:.t.q~':iJi~,~'~i:?l I~ Img/kgl 76.3
'. ~;.;:!. :':::::. ::l ?: !: ;i'::J :."~' :.-:?J ~::7%'i~! J ~: ~d -::'~l~i::i~i~ ~! :J :. ;:: :::~: i~l .:
S.1 J m~gJ 2.5 J m~gJ:~::'?~:::~:'~.J~%.~:.J 6.6 J m~gJ '359
~ J ~g J 37 I ~g J.~.~:'~h~l~?:~?:-J 132 J
121 I~gl 46 Jm~gl;:~:~::.~::~:l~dd::.~J 162 Im~gl ~.4
1.2 I m~gJ 0.4 I ~9I:~:~:??:?.~I:F:?~:?'I2 J
7.8 J m~g J 2.5 J m~ I.':??:~:J~'.:?JJ:~;~::J lO
o.s I m~g J 0.5 J m~g I'?~?:,:~:u:'J~:~:-~;J o.5 I
o.5 I ~gJ 05 I~g I;~':':;~'~?:::~:!:~:;:%~:~to.5 I
~ I ~g J 44 I m~g I:;:~U~;~::I'~:.~%~:~I ~ I
9~ 1~91 279 Jm~gl; F;~%::.l:~:~:~;t 1270 Jm~gl 612 I
LT$
I "HML Lab Sample l 5-Oci-9 !
~ (9'-1Z
il ~ Value ~ Unil
kg J 243 Jm, g/~
~91 o.~s ImoJk
~.91 G.47 I mg~
~91 '-Fo~ Img/k
~91 3.7s I~
kg I 37.2 I ~
Sludge (~'-9') [ Bo,,om Sludcje
'
1.36 Jm~gJ 161 J
0.8 J m~g I 8.3 I
~.78 I m~g I =~ I m~g
~1"0:~5 I~gl 14.8 1~9
1.1 Jm~gJ 1~ J
~.33 I ~1 ~82 I ~g
0.37S J~gJ 13.6 Jm~g
~ I~gl ~ I~g
0.75 /~gl ?.s I~g
~-~ 1~91 62.4
c. al wes,em Fuols Sample 5-,Jam89
v~.e I u.. J va~,o I Uni
s Img~gl s I moJ~
4.76 I rog/kg J 521 I m~
4~ J m~g J 4~ I ~
0.5 I~gl o.5 Im~
3:09 J ~g I 3,33 I ~
124 J ~g I ~28 I ~
1.46 J~gJ 1.32 J~
9.35 I ~;I S~2 I ~
0.5 ImPel 0.5 I~
5 1 ~gl 5 I ~
TCLP Melal$
I
IF~ ~l' uents ~m w ro nol ~t~l~, 1/2 ~e ~/~on ~mil ~ s~. ~ - Not A~lyz~
JOm~o~ are presonl~ h ~/d And
JHe~hls are ~ur~ from ~o ~om of
S-METALB.XLS
3/12_/38
235PM
CONSTITUENT
Total Metals
Antimony
Amen~c
~Jm
Be~lium
Cadmium
Chrc~nium
Total Hexavalenl Chromium
Moly~xlenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Soluble Met~!~
A~senic
Bmium
Cadm~Jm
ChfotnJum
He~avaJenl Chromium
Nickel
Selenium
S~lve~
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
TCLP Metals
Variance
1.46E+O1
. TABLE 11
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHASE. TITLE 22 METALS
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (ALL DATA)
Upper 80%
Conf. Limit
4.983
7.611 no no
549.186 no no
0.4t7 no no
3.917 no no
144.388 no no
· 0.500 no no
7.671 no no
133.974 no no
158.837 no
2.210 no no
9258 no m
34.578 no no
3.138 no no
0.585 no no
6.788 no no
58.091 no no
1325.279 no no
0.250
0,500
10.789
0.050
0,292
3.945
0.292
0,296
5269
0.001
0.292
1.366
0.500
0.050
0.500
1.766
51.614
0.050
0.250
Above TTLC Al Leasl
Limit? STLC Umll? : 4 Samples ?
ANALYSIS (WITHOUT OUTLIERS)
Cone Umlt
4.983
7.611
549.186
0.417
144.388
0,500
7.724
158.837
2.210
9.258
34.578
3.138
0.585
6.788
58.091
025O
0.500
10.789
0.050
0.292
3.945
0292
0.2(36
4.174
0.001
0292
0.500
0050
0.500
1.766
5t.614
0.050
025O
lfLC Above 10x
Limit? STLC Limll?
no no
rio no
no rio
no no
no no
no no
no no
113
Al Leasl
For consliluent$ ~al were not detected, 1/2 ot the delection limil was used.
Not Applicable
S-METALB XLS
Page 1
3:53 PM
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHAS~. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
KENNEDY/JENKS SAMPLE RESULTS
Cai Westem Fuels
HISTORIC SAMPLE RESULTS
HML Samples
CONSTITUENT Results Results 30-Dec-93 15-Oct-91
972313-02.O9 972313-02-10 972313-39-39 972313-39.5-41 972313-39.5-42
972313-4'-06 972313-4'-07 9-Jan-89
Total ¢
Reactive Sulfide
ReacOve,
Rash Point
Noles:
Fo~ cof~stituents that were not detected, 1/2 the deteclion limit is shown.
Heights are measured fr°m the bottom o! lhe lank.
Not AnaJyzed
S-ORGB.XLS Pa9e 1
3/12/<J8
2:35 PM
TABLE 13
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS OF LABORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
CONSTITUENT
Act. No. of TCLP Sample Variance Std Dev. Std Error t-val~e Upper 80% Calc. No. '""Above TCLP Need More At Least
Constituent Samples Threshold Mean (n-l) ConfLimit Samples Limit? Samples? 4 Samples?
Benzene 14 NA 6.37E+01 1.85E+04 1.36E+02 3.64E+01 1.350 112.883 ~~[~
yes
1,2-Dichloroethane 4 NA 5.53E+00 9.37E+00 3.06E*00 1.53E+00 1.638 8.032 ~~~ yes
EthYl benzene 11 NA ' 1.68E+02 2.21E*04 1.~19E+02 4.48E+01 1.372 229.681 ~~j~[~ ~~ .,, yes
Toluene 14 NA 3.38E+02 8.63E~-04 2.~4E+02 7.85E+01 1.350 443.539 ~~[~/~i~~ yes
Xylenes 14 NA 1.04E+03 6.16E+05 7.85E+02 2.10E+02 1.350 1320.815 ~t~{~l~~ yes
2-Methylnaphthalene 4 NA 6.23E+02 1.80E+05 4.25E+02 2.12E+02 1.638 970.254 ~~~1~~! yes
Chlorinated Pesticides/PCB 4 NA 2.75E+00 8.33E-02 2.89E-01 1.44E-01 1.638 2.986 ~ tfJ~j~&~ ~ yes
TCLP Organics
Benzene (TCLP) 7 0.5 3.96E-01 6.04E-02 2.46E-01 9.29E-02 1.440 0.530 1 yes no yes
1,2-Dichloroethane (TCLP) 3 0.5 5.00E-03 6.78E-21 8.23E-11 4.75E-11 1.886 0.005 1 no no no
III II I
Other
Notes:
For concentrations that were not detected, 1/2 the detection limit was used.
NA = not applicable
3/12/98
S-ORGB.XLS Page I 5:26 PM
FIGURES
I
" I
o~elL.--. .....................
Sump
o
o o
'. o 'q,' I' -:
e- oe
iSITE
399
o o ~
0
SOURCE: OILDALE, CALIFORNIA 7.5 MINUTE QUAD.RANGLE, USGS
SECTION 23; T29S; R27E
N
SCALE: 1' - 2000'
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Retail Investors, Inc.
Kem County, Califomia
Site Location Map
K/J 972313.00
October 1997
Figure 1
Figure 2 Waste Classification Decision Diagram
A. rethere.any9 /z"¥~/ valuesoutliers ,~
_ /-. / Are extreme /
extreme values. ~/by Dixon's Test?/
JNo NO/" ~Yes
~ '~'"~ No /Is there scientific /
Determine Mean, I_.~ / justification to ~
SD, J / discard outliers?/
80%01 J ~Yes
Determine Mean, SD, 80% CI
~ With and Without Outliers
and Document
Compare TTLC to 10X STLC Values and 20X TCLP Values
Yes
/~TLC/TCLP Analysis/
Needed?
Yes
Yes
Calculate "N" Per SW 846
Yes
No
No
80% UOL ->
Regulation Threshold
Criteria?
No Further
Sampling
Required
te lS Actual "N" /
ater Than or Equal//
o Calculated "N"y
~/ Is Additional /
Sampling //
Feasible? ~
,,~ls Data Normally
~/. Distributed Using
./ EPAGND-9? /
Waste is
Characteristically
Hazardous for
this COC.
Yes
Waste is Not
Hazardous for
this COC
Use Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test
Use One Sample t-Test
No
Does Null
Hypothesis at 5%
Prevail?
Yes
KJJ 972313.00
s:VetaiN:lia~.n.ppt
Figure 2 Waste Classification Decision Diagram
values outliers
.//extreme values? by Dixon's Test~
J.._ ~ls there scientific ~'
· -. - , "___ !-. No -/ justification to ~
ue[ermlne Ivlean, F"" / , ~
SD, I ,/' discard outhers?// .
80%CI I ~Yes
Determine Mean, SD, 80% CI
~ With and Without Outliers
and Document.
Compare TTLC to 10X STLC Values and 20X TCLP Values
/~TLCFFCLP AnalysisJ
Needed? /,/
gulation Thr~'shold/
Criteria?
No Further
Sampling
Required
Yes
Calculate "N" Per SW 846
ater Than or Equal,/'
Calculated "N"~,,/
Yes
Waste is
Characteristically
Hazardous for
this COC.
Waste is Not
Hazardous for
this COC
Yes ..
No
/
Is Additional /
Sampling /'
No
~/~~.s. Data Normally /
~stributed Using ~
EPA GA/D-9? /
/.. ~ . '/.,/ ...
Yes
Use Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test
Use One Sample t-Test
No
Does Null
Hypothesis at5%
Prevail?
Yes
K/J 972313.00
s:VetaJ~lag-n.ppt
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants.
21 March 1998
Engineers & Scientists
2151 Michelson Drive
Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612-1311
714-261-1577
FAX 714-261-2134
Mr. Kevin Shaddy
California Environmental Protection Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Region I - Clovis
1515 Tollhouse Road
Clovis, California 93611
Subject:
Tank 50001 Waste Classification Information Addendum 1
2800 Standard Street, Bakersfield, California
K/J 972313.00
Dear Mr. Shaddy:
As promised in our letter dated 13 March 1998, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (Kennedy/Jenks)
conducted additional sampling and analysis of the contents of Tank 50001 located at 2800
Standard Street in Bakersfield, California to supplement classification of the water and sludge
matedal in the tank. Three water samples and eight sludge samples were collected by
Kennedy/Jenks and its subcontractors on 11 March 1998 in a manner similar to that described
in the Waste Classification Information document dated 13 March 1998. The samples were
submitted under an appropriate chain-of-custody protocol to BC Laboratories, Inc. for analysis.
Water sample analytes included total hexavalent chromium to complete the Kennedy/Jenks
data set and dissolved sulfides at the request of the City of Bakersfield (City) wastewater
treatment plant. Sludge sample analysis included STLC lead and TCLP benzene to provide
additional data for determining sludge characteristics. Laboratory analytical reports for the
additional samples are contained in Attachment 1.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
This information supplements the information described in Section 4.4 of the 13 March 1998
Waste Classification Information document. Data and statistical analysis tables are provided in
Attachment 2. Revised tables are identified with the revision number in the title.
Kennedy/Jenks revised the statistical analysis to include additional laboratory analytical results
for STLC Lead (sludge phase), TCLP Benzene (sludge phase), and total hexavalent chromium
(water phase).
Oil Phase
No new laboratory analytical data was collected for the oil phase. However, the organic data
summary table was revised to include summary ignitability test results previously presented in
'Appendices C and D of the 13 March 1998 Waste Classification Information document.
Mr.. Kevin Shaddy
Department of Toxic Substances Control
21 March 1998
Page 2
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Water Phase
As explained in the 13 March 1998 Waste Classification Report, hexavalent chromium samples
were collected and analyzed based upon total chromium results in the 0.32 to 11.9 mg/I range.
Since the.data set submitted on 13 March 1998 contained only three hexavalent chromium
analyses, an additional hexavalent chromium sample was collected and analyzed on 11 March
1998.
A statistical outlier test, known as the "Dixon's Test for Outliers," was used to determine
whether any of the hexavalent chromium TTLC analytical data met the criteria of being an
outlier. Although one hexavalent chromium value was identified as an outlier, it was retained in
the data set as described below. Statistical outliers are resented in Table 2.
The hexavalent chromium data set shows four non-detect results, one significantly higher than
the rest due to a difference in the detection limit used by the laboratory (1 mg/I versus 0.01
mg/I). It was concluded that this value should not be rejected since it is an "assumed" value
calculated at one-half the detection limit. The mean, standard deviation, and the 80% upper
confidence interval (UCI) were calculated for hexavalent chromium. The 80% UCI is well below
the regulatory threshold criteda in either case.
The N number was calculated for hexavalent chromium to evaluate whether the data set was
statistically valid. The results of this calculation indicate that a sufficient number of samples
were collected and analyzed for hexavalent chromium.
Based upon the above analytical results and data analysis, the water phase is not a
characteristically hazardous waste.
Solid/Sludge Phase
Eight additional sludge samples were collected and analyzed for the purpose of expanding the
STLC lead data set. The statistical analysis of Title 22 metals conducted on sludge phase
laboratory results presented in the 13 March 1998 Waste Classification Information document
indicated that STLC lead exceeded the hazardous waste criteria unless an outlier was removed
from the data set. Table 10 contains a summary of the Title 22 metals results, including lead.
One soluble lead datum was previously identified as a statistical outlier. However, when' the
laboratory results for the STLC lead samples collected on 11 March 1998 were added to the
data set, the data set was not normally distributed. Therefore, none of the tests for outliers
could be applied.
The N number was calculated for STLC lead to evaluate whetherthe data set was statistically
valid. The results of this calculation indicate that a sufficient number of samples were collected
and analyzed for STLC lead.
Mr. Kevin Shaddy
Department of Toxic Substances Control
21 March 1998
Page 3
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
The mean, standard deviation and 80% UCI were calculated for STLC lead. Results are
summarized in Table 11. The STLC lead 80% UCI is 3.35 mg/I, which is well below the STLC
lead hazardous waste threshOld criterion of 5 mg/I. Based upon statistical evidence, the
material is not characteristically hazardous due to STLC lead. Irrespective of this non-
hazardous determination, Kennedy/Jenks intends to characterize the initial loads of actual
solidified material removed from Tank 50001 pdor to disposal to landfill (see the document
entitled "Work Plan, Sparks Estate Property, 50-000-Barrel Tank Content Removal and
Demolition," furnished under separate cover). Additional characterization of actual disposed
solids is required to meet landfill acceptance criteria in any event. This characterization will
include STLC lead. If there is a change in waste characteristic measured at the time of landfill
profiling, the waste will be managed accordingly.
Table 12 contains a summary of solids/sludge phase organic constituent analytical data
including the new TCLP Benzene results. Dixon's test for outliers showed that the historic
TCLP benzene value of 0.75 mg/I is a statistical outlier. The mean, standard deviation and 80%
UCl were calculated for TCLP benzene, both with and without the statistical outlier included.
These results are contained in Table 13. No 80%' UCI values exceeded the Title 22 threshold
criteria for hazardous waste, either with or without the outlier; The sludge/solids TCLP benzene
80% UCI value, including the Outlier, is 0.44 mg/I, well below the well below the 0.5 mg/I
hazardous waste regulatory threshold. In summary, the sludge/solid phase does not exhibit
hazardous waste characteristics.
The N number was calculated for TCLP benzene to evaluate whether the data set was
statistically valid. The results of this calculation indicate that a sufficient number of samples
were collected and analyzed for TCLP benzene.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on review of the laboratory analytical results of samples collected by Kennedy/Jenks in
the fall of 1997 and winter 1998, review of agency records, interviews with former property
owners, and historical analytical results of samples collected by others, it appears that the
various phases of material in Tank 50001 are not RCRA-listed wastes or characteristically
hazardous wastes under the criteria found in the California Code of Regulations Title 22, Article
4. Additional STLC lead and TCLP benzene analysis conducted after submittal of the Waste
Classification Information on 13 March 1998 confirms that these constituents do not exceed
hazardous waste characteristic criteria thresholds. Kennedy/Jenks further believes that
because of the waste management practices to be used, all of which involve agency regulated
facilities, the disposal of the material in Tank 50001 will pose an insignificant hazard to human
health and safety.
CERTIFICATION
"1 certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the
information submitted in this report and all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those
individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the information
Mr. Kevin Shaddy
Department of Toxic Substances Control
21 March 1998
Page 4
Kennedy J enks Consultants
is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibilib¢ of fine and imprisonment."
Signature: ~---~ ~.
Printed Name: Craiq '~. Dial, P.E.
Title: Manaqer, Facilities Engineering, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Date: 20 March 1998
s:~relail~adendrn 1 ,doc
ATTACHMENT 1
LABORATORY RESULTS
"'~AMPLE CH~F-CUSTOD Y ANAL YSIS REQUEST
30 th St., Federal Way, WA 98003
17310 Red Hill Ave.. /t220. Ir~ne. CA 92714
2191 E~t Bayehore Rd.. #200, Pale Nfo, CA g4303
[] 333S Bradsh~w P~:I,, //140. E 4~1[o, CA95827
~ 303 8ec~rd St.. ~ F~l~co~107
~ 10OO Hill ~., E200, Venture, CA~3~3
, ~ ' : Address
Project No. ~ · O0 Phone ~- ~~ ~% Carrier~ay Bill No.
~ ': ~. C~menUCo~ifions
(1) Wflte only one sample number in each apace.
(2l Specify type of sample(si: Water (W). Solid (Si. or indicate type.
(3) Ma~ each ,ample which should be compoalted in Laboratory aa follows: Place an "A" in box for each sample that should be composited into one sample; use sequential letter for additional groups.
(4) Preaervation of 8ample.
{6) Writs each analyses requested acres8 top. Place an 'X" in appropriate column to indicate type of analyala needed for each ,ample.
SAMPLE RELINQUISHED BY: SAMPLE RECEIVED BY:
P ~0. v.. Method :
: .
0.~;6 0:5 Sw-Golo
: . ~ . ;
I' ': ~~ -' ~ · I ~"4.~:~..f.~ ~. ,.
: : · ' , ! ' I
]]ii
:
CODs OF Rg~:IO~S FOR ~,ARDOUS
.'~$ION ' : ·
200 ~ ~TIlq | ROAD,: ~ 115
~~, -~ '~o~; .
· [
'j
Date
Date Received: 03/12/98 .I
m~r/liter P:O.L.
N~ne D~cecr. ed 0.:5 SW- 6010
· : "b ,', i !
'-...::
'' ' i ' ' ' ,J.:''.:':. ' '; :, I,!",'! "~.'. .~-
I · . · ..... L..... : '.,
i- :' ' i ~ -" , ' · ' ;.:'. , II::.':i
J .I ' . t , . : I · '.',:'. ' · lel:l ':l ·
I ~ · ~ ' .I , : .... Ij . , ' I'l , '1 · i' '.Il'
~ ' I ' ') ' · ' : ~ ' ', '. ' '
j:. .I. ;: , . I. ! ' ' , : .... , · I,:,'.! ,' il.
I:- :1 ' : i J ':; I ' : . ~ : ' " : : I'.'.!,l- .! ]'
I.' .I : · 'i I .'.1 ii t' ' I : ' ' · I i' -.
i' "i · .~ I .. ' ' : ' . · : · · · ' I' 'q" 'i' i
· ' I · ' I' I 'i .' · : . '. .. . i ' J ::l ' " '
I. .; · · · I ': · t . . : . ':';'J J | i' · <[lld:j''; ! '"~;:.qd "'j', .';'"
· J I' · , -,,' .' ..;"lSj} J ' I '
~_..:..,,. ; ,:.' · · -.' I:. .,.....:., ~, .I:~! · .:....,:
.: .....c.. ~ ;je.t~3,..ta L'~l;X3rt:ed above ate $n ,g/].;Lqer ....c~ a 2,11tz-,d.E~ .lx~.~:L~ (s .,..i'~ e...
J : , ca i~ozni~ ~_m_~-~scracAve Co~e u~:i~g a '(8-hc~c citric acid (deA~iie~
I' :. ; £0 2exa~al~mt' chzcaium) e___~xaction. .
J ~Q..L, = Pr~ical: .,Q~m,t~tatx~ ;I~l~t (refers .to. th~;least..am~m~ ~f ~ulv~e,, .1 ,I -i' m.
· I I ' · ' : .... · .... ~ '. ..,) : . :.'~-': . .~'
I ; , .:-.I. :..':' . -,., .' :', · ',.-. · ':
I- R.EI~IUIJI'CiI.~.;I-.' ! I. : . . '- : '.I4 -.' I'1:'.: ;'1.. I
{ ! :~,. -.~J,t ;-,,u,i:~;~ ~,,.t,,at,-,~ ~a~.~ w,.~o ~,~,/,,~.~,~./Ch,,i.c~ ~,,:ho,~!. : :J I : ]
' ~ , : : i '-'fL.:.'. ' -.: ' ! ' -'. ' '' ~ -". .''1', '!
... . :.., .......
- : · ' · ' I .: " ~ ' : · , ' J I '!'. ·
:.:. .'r:. ·
: ' '". " " :"t
. : · · . . ! · .
~' : ' 'i' ' : . ·
, .J 4J. OQ .Aqla6~... Bakenmeld. OAl~laO8. (8o5),e27.491'~. FAX(e<~') .,~ZT-lOle
I · / : :. ' : ' ' · I i :
.~ ; :,: ..
Sam~. le Oolle
..
:
: i . .D72.313-5S:5., .5-52
~/?ima:. '0~/~X/95 ® 0~.:;i.01;~
Dace ~eporced:' 03/17/9
D~te ~eceived:: 03/1119
I I
' .'l : :
I :I
['' i ' I
· Reg~ lat~F
'!''-~'
· i. ,.o
il'- : -'
~tr.~o~
$W-6010 ·
:
'? '! ]:
I-
4100At1~.(~ ~ BeJmr~eld, CA~, (80b")l~?',:4911 . FAX ~105) .,t~_'_7-1918 . Id ! ! J
.. . ~ ~ : -
: .~ ~ .: ~ , I
· $,J~udi;)'t e :ID::'
S.~le De~.th
I
Date Reported:. 03/17/9~
~,t~ ~.= ,8-027~-,.
'
, Sample ResuLts
· i · ~/~.~-~ -
;
0;5 ~W-GOld
.:, i .:' .~
': '~ ~' ':i'
~5~uble Co~ntz~t~Lon
t
(SI't_,C)
~ate ~eporced: '
"i
~l'~e DeCe~ced
· ' ~ I.., ..
· ~~~S= i ' · '* . ,~.:'* '
. . ~ ., ~. . .. . ..... ~ . ~ ~ ·
, -..:. . ~ ~ ,
I
r
'I
:t, .I : .'
TO 8515196 P. 89
~ ..' i
~ ; : ·
i : ,
~~ ~g O~ ~~ ffO~ ~S ~ Dwz-~Y~o]
~ '.~?,~: ,: ., j · :... ,.;
~..... ~}-eas-gtes. '! , : ' ,':J I
'.
· '' : ' · I J
': ' I ·
~ . ~ ~ ...
: I
~ : ' I
. ...
;~'? I~' i;.
· .:~:' '..
: .~ h .[~. i':
' '~'1
~!: . .~,-
/
- Mr'Il-lO uo~o&~J~ r[~ll-~. ~ok OO~O&lUlOU I-UO4 F.U~/U¥
volaclle Organxc Analysis
(TCL~ F-~Cracg !
-1
KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS
LA~ORATORY DIVISION
200 NE~ STIN~ ROAD, SUITE 115
~AKER~FZ~LD, CA 93309
ACc~: TODD ROOK 805-835-9785
S .ample Description: SPARKS I~$TATR
~esulcs
Dace Reported: 03/18/98
Dace Received: 03/11/98
Labor&coryNo.= 98-02791-1
Dace Colic=ced=
Dace ~xcracced;
Dace Analyzed:
03/16/9e
o3/1~/98
Prac, cioal
Repor~$ng Quanc~cac£~,n
Unlc~ ~
0.30 mG/L 0.01
T ,2-Dlchloroecha~e-d4
oluene-d8
4-Bromo£Zuorobenzene
Qual$cyConcrol Daca
Control
84. 7g-114
106. 88-110
112. 86-1~5'
4'lOOAtiaa OL. Bakersfield, CA 9,ssoe. (aos) a27'-4,911. FAX (60S) S2?'-'lS'la
k~ar-19-GS O~:~Zan rrom-i~ La~s 8Ob3ZTO~b9 T-034 P.03/09 F-037
Volac~.le Or~janic 3m~:l.¥s~.s
tTCT--P Excr&cc)
Pa~e
~Y JENKS CONSULTANTS
LABORATORY DMgION
200 NEW STIN~ ROAD, SUITE
BAXEP~FI~D, CA 93309
A=c3~: TODD ROOK 80S-815-978S
SPARKS BS'Z'*AT~
972313-6 .S-S1
6.0'
Sludge, L:Lquld
SHANE SCRIMSHZR~
Dace Reported:
Dace Received: 03/12/98
Laboratoz~No.: 96-02791-2
Dace Colleoced:
DaCe Analyzed:
·, 2 -DS chloco~chane - d,~
Bluene-d8
rc~ofluorobenzene
Qu~licy Cc~crol Dac&
8~. 76-11%
105. 88-110
98. 8G-1~5
~arc G. Buccrlm
~mparcmenc supervisor
4100AtJa,s C~.. Bakers/'~d. CA 93308. (805) 327.4911 . FAX (805') 327-1918
Volatile Organic Analyszs
(~PA Method 82%0J
(TCLP E~racc)
Page
K;RN~DY JENKS C0~SULTANT$
L~ORATORY DIVZSZON
200 ~ STIN~ ROAD. SUITE 115
BAK~RgFIELD, CA 93309
A~T~: TODD ROOK 805-835-9785
Dace Repoz~ed: 03/18/9S
D&ce Reue,ved: 03/~1/98
T~-~oraco~No-: 98-02791-]
Pro]eec Number:' SPARKS ESTATE
Sample LD: 97231~-5.5-52
Sample Depth:
SamPle Matrix= Sludge,,-L~qu~d
Sample Collecced By= SHANE SCRIHSHIP~
Dace Collected:
Dace Excr&cced:
Dace Analyzed:
03/1~/~B e o~:~Op~
03/~/sa
O~/zs/9s
0.3~ mg/L 0.01
~$~Concrol Data
__t Re cov~z-!/-
~oncrol
1,2 -Dichloroechane-d%
Bluene-d8
ro~f luorob~p_ ~ ene
87. 76-114
98. 88-13.0
3.03. 86-3.3.5
Cal~for~/a D.O.H~S. Cert. 91186
4100Atlas CL · Balcem~ld, CA93306 . (805)~7-4911 · FAX (805) 32.?-1018
Vola=tle OrganJ. c Jma17a:~.
l~age
I~lX'R;DY 3;.NKS CONSDL'~,NTS
L,~O~0RY DZV*ZSZO~
200 N;H STZI~ R(~.O, SUZ'I~ 115
~FZELD, C~ 93309
Act:n: TODD RO0~ 805-835-9T85
Pro~ ccc Number:
Sa~0le ZD:
-~an~le Depth
Sample ~t:r~x:
Sample Collected
SRi~.KS
972313-5.0-53
5.0'
Sludge. LJ. qutd
Dace Reported:
Dace Received:
LAbOranO~NO.:
Dace Collected:
Dace Focc~ct:ed:
Dat:e Analyzed:
o3/zs/se
03/11/98
98-02791-~
0]/11/98 e Ol:20~M
o3/16/9a
03/~8/9a
~en~,ene
0.36 mg/L 0.01
1,2-Dichloroechane-d4
,-Brc~o£1uorobenzene
Qualt~Cont:rol Dana
87.
Z01. 68-110
107. 86-115
4100AUas CC. Bakamf'mld. CA 93,906. (805) 327-4811 . FAX (805') 327-1018
VoZac~Ze Organ~cAnaZysle
(TCLP £xcr&cc)
Page
KP/qNEDY J;NKS CONSULTANTS
LABORATOR~ DIVISION
200N~a STIN; ROAD, SUIT~ 115
BAKF~FZ£~, CA 93309
Aeon: TODD ROOK 805-835-978S
PrO]e¢cNumber:
Sample ID:
Sample Depc.h:
Sa."~91e Matrix:
Sample Collecced~y:
SPARKS
972313-3.S-$4
3.5'
Sludge.
SH&NE SCP~TMSHI~
Da=e ~eporced: 03/18/98
Dace Reeetved: 03/11/98
Labor~coryNo.: 98-02791-5
Dace Collected:
Dace Extracted:
Dace ~a%~zed:
03/z1/98 · ~0:20AM
0~/~;/~8
03/~8/SS
Benzene
~esulcs
Pr~;al
0.39 mg/L 0.Ol
1,2-D~ohloroeghane-d4
Toluene-d8
-Brc~ofluoro~enzene
Con;rol
85. 76-114
101. 88-110
107. 86-115
Ouarc O. Bucc~
4100Al:la~ OL · Ba¥..~,l~(l. OA9330~ · (1305) 327-~11
idar-i¥-¥, u~:~4al rror-b4. ~aD~ 8053Z~0750 T-034 P.0?/00 F-037
volat=:l.'le Organ~Lc AnalyG:L-
(TCL~ ~xcz'a, cc)
P&ge
K~mEDY J~qKS CONSULTANTS
LABORATORY Di~I$ION
200 NEW$TINE ROAD. $UZT~ 115
BAKERSFIELD. CA 93309
Attn: TODD RDOK 805-835-978S
Pro~%eg l~aber: SPARK~ RSTAT~
Sample ID: 972313-3.5-55
Sample Depgl~: 3.S'
Bam~le Mac,ix: Sludge. Liquid
Sample Collectedly: SH~NE SCRIMSHIRE
Laboracor~'No.:
Date Colleaced:
Dace Ex, ratted:
Dace Analyzed:
t~sulcs ,, ~
03/18/98
03/11/98
98-02791-~
03/11/98 O ~0:3GAH
03/16/98
03/Z8/~8
Guantlcat~o~
O.4S mg/L 0.02
1.2 - D$ohloroechane - d~
oluene-d8
-Bromo£1uorobenzene
QualtglFConcrol Dace
78. 76-11%
104. 88-110
ST. 86-115
Note: PQL'a were raised due co high concentration of c&rget anal~ces =equating
aample dilution.
4100)~LI ~. E3alcer~fiekl, GA~. (605) 327-4911. FAX (805) 327-1918
ktar-iV-¥u un:n4am ~rom.'~ LaD; 8053Z70750 T-034 P.0B/00 F-037
Vola=£1e Ore, m/c
(TCLP
Page
1
KGRNEDY~ CONSULTANTS
LABORATORY DIVISION
200 NEW STINE ROAD, SUITH 115
BAKEP~FI£LD. CA 93309
Aeon: TODD P~)OK 805-835-9785
Project Number: SPA~KS ~gTAT~
Sample ID: 972313-3.5-S6
Sample Depth: 3.5
Sample Macrlx; Sludge. L~d
S~lo Colle~ed By: S~
Dace Reported: 03/1g/9~
Dace Eeceived: 03/11/98
Laboraco~ No.: 98-02791-7
Dace Collected;
Dace F~'=racted:
Dace Ar~alyzed:
03/11/98 e 10:40A~
03/16/98
03/18/98
Analysi~
0.4O mg/L 0.01
1,2 - Dlchloroe;hane
oluene-d8
-Bromofluorobenzerte
Quality Control Daca
81. 76-114
100. 88-110
105. 86-11S
.4100Adas; OL · Bak~ers~ielcl, CA93,308 . (805) 327-4811 . FAX (805) 327-1918
Idar-i ¥-¥u uo ::~4ill
1-0~4
F-037
Vola=ile Orgasmic Analysis
(EPA Me=hod 8240)
[TCLP ~xcraec)
Page
KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS
LABORATORY DMSION
200 N~W STINE ROAD, SUIT~
BAI~RSFIELD, CA 93309
AC~: TODD ROOK 80S-835-9785
ProJ eec Number:
Sample Depth:
Sample Ma=rix:
sample Colleaced
SPARK~ RSTAT~
972313-3.5-57
Slud~e,:~: L~quid
gHAN;
Dace Reported: 03/18/98
Dane Rece~ved: 03/11/98
Laboracory No.= 98-02791-8
Dace Collected:
Dane Lx~racced:
Dace Analyzed:
03/18/98
Benzene
~esulcs ~ r.lm~
0.34 mg/L 0.01
1,2-Dichloroe=h&ne-d4
oluane-d8
-Bromofluorobenze~e
Quality Control Dana
83. 76-114
100. 89-110
110. 86-~15
Cal~fora~& D.0.H.S. Cern. #1186
4100 Atlas Cf. . 8aicersfiol(:f, P..,AO3308 , (805)327-4911 , FAX (60~) 327.1918
30 South 33Sth SL, Fecle~al Way, WA, 88003
17310 I~d Hill Ava,, 1220, Irvlne, CA 92714
2191 East Baymhora Rd,, //200, Pale Alto. CA 94303
3338 Brada~ Rd,, W140, Sa CA 96827
303 Second
10OO Hill Rd., //200, Van[ufa, CA 93003
Date '~u, Jltl~' Report To'~'oJ~ ~_~ ~ Lab Destination' ~. ~
Source of Samples ~~ ~~ Company ~..~/~ ~ Address.
Sampler Name ~,~ ~.~'t~%'..~ Address ~0 ~. ~ ~ '~ It~ ,
~ ~ Phone
Phone ~0~- ~3~-~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~
Proje~ No. ~2 ~1~, ~0 Phone ~0~-~- ~ ~ ~ Carrier~a~ Bill No.
~ ID No. Client ID NO~ .~' ' Date. ::~: ~ ~ :~: ~, ;~:~::~ ~~ : '.(c~ner' ~e, contour ~er, etc.)
' X
,
(I) Write only one sample number in each space.
I2) Specl~ type of sample(s): Water (WI. Solid (SI, or Indicate type. .
{3) Mark each sample which should be composited in Laboratory aa follows: Place an 'A' in box. for ~ach sample that should be comp, osited into one sample; use sequential letter for additional groups.
(4) l~eservation of sample.
{5} Write each analyses requested across top. Place an "X' in appropriate column to indicate type of analysis needed for each sample.
SAMPLE RELINQUISHED BY: SAMPLE RECEIVED BY:
~r-19-98 OZ:45pa Froa-BC Labs 8053Z~'0750 T-O?6 P.OZ/05 F-080
1
KENNEDY J~NKS CONSULTJU4TS
L~BOT~ATORY DZVISZON
200 N~W STINE R~, STIITE 115
~KERSFIELD, CA 93309
Ac=n: TODD ROOK 60~-835-9~8~
Pro]e~cNumber:
Sample ID:
SampI~ng Dace/Time:
SPARKS ESTATE
#9723~3-12-58
0~/11/98 e 03:00PM
SHAN~ SCP. IMSHZ~.E
03/11/98
98-02792-1
None De=ecned ~g/L 10. EPA-?196
4100 Arias C~. o BaXarsl~ld, CA 93308 , (805) 327-4911 · FAX (~) ~q'.1018
i~r-16-66 OZ:45pa Fr(m-BC Labs 8053Z70750 T-076 P.03/05 F-080
WATER ANALYSZ$
(G~N~RAL CI~ISTRY)
KF~TNF, DY 3~1KS ¢ON$0LTANTS
LABORATORY DMSZOH
2~ NEW ST~ ROAD, SUITE
Acr.~: '~:~DD RO0~ 80~-835-9785
Project Sumbe~:
Sampling Dace/Time:
SPARKS E STAT~
#972313 -12 -58
03/11/98 ~ 0~:00PM
SHANE $CRIMSHIP~
~onec$cuenc~
DSssolved Sulfide
Dace R~port:ed:
Dace Received:
Labora=or¥'No.:
03/19/98
03/11/98
98-02792-1
Nc:me De~ecced mg/L 0.25 ~PA-376.2
P.Q.L. - Pr&ccAcal Quan~&Dacion L~m~c (refer. co the lean= amoun= of anal¥ce
quancA£Aable based on sam~lo
California .O.H.S. Cer= ~1186
4100 Atlas Ct. , 5aY~m~ld, CA 03306 , (605) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1818
ANALYSIS
(GF.J~RAL ~2~Y)
Sampl:Lng Dace/?~me:
SPAR]CS ESTA'Z~
#972313o11-59
03/11/98 e 03=20PH
DXssol~ed Sulfide
None De=ecced
Dace
Lahora=oryNo.:
03/19/98
03/11/96
98-02792-2
mg/L
P.O.L.
0 .':PS
376.2
P.Q.L. - Pracci~cal Quanc~ca~on Llml= (refers =o =he lease amount of ~e
~f~le ~a~ e~le size used ~d ~ieal ce~l~o ~l~ed).
' ~ A~encto ~
4100AIhisCL . Balcorsfiek:l. CA03306 . (605) 327-4911 · FAX(60S) 327-1018
gar-lg-gB OZ:4$m~ From-BC Lab; gO~3ZTO?50 T-O?E P.05/05 F-OBO
WAT~ ANALYSIS
(~N~.AL CHEMISTRY)
1
KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS
LABORATORY DMSION
200 ~TEW STIN~ ROAD, SUITE 115
~J%li~RS FZ£LD 0 CA 93309
Aeon: TODD R~OK 80~-835-9785
Dace ~eceived:
Laborator~No.:
03/~/98
03/11/98
98-02?92-3
Sampling Da=e/Time:
SPARKS £STATR
#972313-10-G0
SHANR SCRIHSHI~E
Dissolved Sulf£de
~eSul~a . Units P.O.L~
None Detected m~/L 0.25
~PA-376.2
P.Q.L. = Prat=ica1 Quan=$ca/~on L~mi= (refers =o =he leaG~ am~un= of anal~e
qua]~f~le b~s~d on gam~le size used and analy=ical ceahn~que employed),
4100A1]~ CT. · BakersT~l(:f, CA 93808 . (805) 327-4911 · FAX (805) 327-1918
TABLE 2 (Revision 1)
DIXON'S TEST FOR OUTLIERS
SHAPIRO-WILK(2) TEST FOR NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
OIL PHASE DATA POINTS¢) CALCULATED TABLE RESULT
Mercury, Total (rog/kg) 0.1 I 0.1 I 0.1 ! 0.1 0,050 0.730 Non-Normality
'WATER PHASE
Barium, Total (rog/kg) ~ 0~4'42 I ~(~r 0.4 0.666 0.698
2 .
Hexavalent Chromium, Total (mg/kg......~) 0.005 ' ~ 0.005 0.005 1.000 0.889 Non-Normality
Benzene, TCLP (mg/I) 0.052 ~ 0.31 I 0.20~ 0.652 0.616 Normal
0.30I 0.36I 0.36~
0.36I 0.39I 0.451 0.40
0.34
Notes:
¢) Outlier according to EPA DATAQUEST Model is shaded.
(2) Shapiro-Wilk Test for Normally Distributed Data after outlier value removed from data set.
!(3) BC Laboratories, 15 October 1991.
(4) Cai Western Fuels, 5 January 1989.
es)Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, October 1997.
'(6) .
Park Environmental Corporation, 30 December 1993.
03/20/1998
OUTLIER.XLS Page 1 10:41 AM
TABLE 4 (Revision l)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
OIL PI-;ASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CONSTITUENT Sep-97
KENNEDY/JENKS SAMPLES
December 1997 Sample Results
972313-17'-01
972313-16-21,22,23,30
972313-16.25-24
972313-16.5-27,28,29,33
Total Organics Value Value Units Value Units
Benzene 10 6.1 7.5
2-Dichloroethane 10 1 3.5
E~hyl benzene 340 340 270
Toluene 340 340 260
.. X¥1enes 2200 2000 1900
2-Methylnaphthalene 1100
Chlorinated PeslJceds/PCB 4 3 mgJkg
Value Units
10
10
3 mg/kg 2 rog/kg
972313-17-34
TCLP Jcs
0.032
0.005
0.038
0.005
0.037
0.005
Cai Western Fuels Oil
9-Jan-89 14-Dec-89
Value
237.8
113.6
197.3
324.9
Units
3O
370
520
1,900
0.083
30-Dec-93
Units
BC Lab Sample
15-Oct-91
0-3'
100
10
700
3370
15-Oct-91
0-3' layer
5
510
600
1940
Notes:
For contituents that were not detected, 1/2 the detection limit is shown.
Outlers are presented in bold and italics.
Heights are measured from the bottom of the tank.
Samples 972313-17'-02 and 972313-4'-08 were not analyzed.
'l O-ORGB.XLS page I
,{
TABLE 6 (Revision 1)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS
WATER PHASE. TITLE 22 METALS
' KENNEDY/JENKS' SA,MP.LE RESULTS - ~ HISTORIC sAMpLE R~:SULTS '
CONSTITUENT ' ' October 1997 Sample Results November 1997 Sample Results December 1997 Sample Resulis March 1998 Samples Oil,~V--ater Cai Western Fuels BC Sample HML Sample
' 9723~3-15'-03 972313-12'-04 972313-12-07 ' ~72313-10-0§' 9~2313-0~-l't',t 6 ',9723t 3-1, 0.54 2,17 972313:11-13, 20 ' '972313-11.5-14,t 9 972313-t 2-58 9/20/88 5-Jan-89 15-Oct-91 t 5-Oct-91
Total Metals ValUe Units Value Units,,,,Valc~e' units Value Units Value ' Units ,,,,Value Units Value Units ' 'V;~lu~ Units Value Unit~' ' Value ' Units Value Units ,3-.6',,sample 3-6' sample
~:: :.- 29.5 mg,~.g 5,2 rog/kg 2.01 rog/kg
II I I I I IIIIIIIII I I I I I I II'/ III I I I II I
TCLP Metals
F
~tes:
For ~nst~uents that were ~t dete~, 1/2 the detection limit is s~wn. ~ = Not Analyzed
O~liers are prese~ in ~ld and italics.
~ = Data for ~his ~nstituent has ch~ged bas~ on additional la~rato~ analysis.
Heights are measured ~rom tbe ~om of the tank.
Did not ~ for m~L versus mg~g. S~ific gravity was 1
~mples 9723 ~ 3-17'-02 and 972313~'-08 were not analyze.
W-METALB.XLS Page 1
I
T~LE ] ~e~s~n 1)
SUGARY OF SW ~
~A~C~ CAL~O~ ON ~BORATORY RESUL~
WATER PHASE. ~LE ~ M~ALS
CONS~E~ ~A~S~CAL .A~LYSIS (A,LL O .A, TA} STAtiCAL AN~Y~S ~HO~ O~UERS)
STLC 1~ ~LC ~t. ~. of ~e t-~ Up~ ~% ~. No of ~ve ~LC ~0x ~ M~e ~ At Least Act. No. of ~e t-~ Up[~ ~ ~. ~ of ~ve ~C
To~l Me~ls ~ho~ ' STLC ~es~ ~es ~ V~ Std. Dev. (n-l~ ~nf. Limit ~m~es Limit? ~LC Limit? ~es ? ~ 4 ~mples ? ~es ~ V~ Std. Dev. (n-~) ~{. Umlt ~es Limit?
~y 15.0 ~5~.0 ~ 7 2.36E+~ 6.14E+~' 2.~E+~ 1.~ 3.7~ 0 ~ .. ~ ~ y~ 7 2.36E+~ 6.14E+~ 2.~E*~ 1.~ 3,7~ 0 ~
~n~ 5.0 ~.0 5~ ' ' '7 2 77E-01 4.62E~2 2.15E-01 1.~ 0.~ 0 m ~ .~ yes 7 2.77E~ 4.62E~ 2,1~ I.~ O.~ 0
~ 1~.0 1~.0 ~0 ' "7 5.~E+~ 1.15E+02 1.07E*01 1.~ 11.~6 0 m ,= ~ y~ 6 1.~E+~ 3.~E+~ 1.~E~ 1.4~ ?,~ 0
~ 0.8 7.5 .75 7 ~ 2.36E~1 6.10E~ 2.47E-01 1.~ 0.371 0 ~ m ~ y~ 7 2.36E~1 6.10E~ 2.4~1 1.~ ~,.371 0
~m 1.0 ~0.0 1~ 7 ~ 3.51E~1 9.15E-02 3.03E~1 1.~0 0.516 0 ~ i~ '~ , y~ 7 3.51E~1 9.1.5E~ 3.0~1 1.~ (1:516 0 ~
' ~r~ ~.0 56~.0 2~0 7 3.~+~ 2.21E+01 4.70E+~ 1.~ 6.10~ 0 ~ ~ .~ ~ y~ 7 3.~E+~ 2.21E+01 4.7~+~ 1.~0 ~1~ 0
T~ ~ ~ium 5.0 50.0 ~ 4 1.28E~1 6.~ 7E~2 2.~E-01 1 .~ 0.~1 0 ~ ~ ~ y~ 4 1.28E~1 6.17E-02 2.~1 ~ .~9 0.~1 0
~ 80.0 '8~.0 8~ 7 .1.1~E+~ 1.50E+~ 1.22E+~ 1.~ 1.~9 0 m .~ ~. y~ 7 1.1'9E+~ 1.50E+~ 1.~E~ 1.~ 0 ;.8~ 0
'~ 25.0 2~.0 2~ 7 3.01E+~ 2.46E+01 4.~E+~ 1.~ 5.712 0 m ,~ ~ y~ 7 3.0~E*~ 2.~E+01 4.~E+~ 1.~0 5.7{2 0
~ 5.0 50.0 ~ -7 3.~E+00 1.97E+01 4.~E+~ 1.~ 5.8~5 0 ~ m ~ y~ 7 3.~E+~ 1.97E+01 4.~+~ 1 ~ ~.815 0
' M~ ' 0.2 2.0 ~ 5 2.70E-02 ~.~E-03 4.10E~2 1.~ 0.0~ 0 .. I m ~ ~ ~ 5 2.70E~ 1.~E~ 4.10E~ 1.~ ' ~.,:0~ '~ ~
~ ~0.0 ~.0 ~ ....7' 1.~E+~ ~.~E+~ I.~E+~ 1.~ 1.~2 0 ~ ~ ~ 7~ 7 1.20E+~ 1.~E+~ 1~ 1.~ 1.862 0
N~ ~.0 ~.0 2~ 8 2.31E*~ 4.~E+~ 2.22E+~ 1.415 3.423 0 m ~ ~ y~ 8 2.31E+~ 4.~E+~ Z~ 1.41~ ' '3.4~ 0
~ 1.0 10.0 1~ 7 2.93E~1 5.~E~ 2.30'E'~1 1.~ ' 0.418 0 ~ ~ ~ . .. ~ 7 2.93E~I 5.~E~ 2.3~1 1-~ ('418 0 m
~1~ 5.0 ~.0 5~ 6' ' 3.83E~I 1.30E~1 3.60E~1 1.476 0.~" 0 ~ m ~ ~ 6 3.83E~1 1.30E~1 3.6~1 1. (:.6~ 0
~ium 7.0 '~0.0 7~ 7 2.~E+~ 5.~E+~ 2.37E+~ 1.~ 3.7~ 0 m ~' ~ y~ 7 2.~+~ 5.~E+~ 2.37E~ 1.~ :~.7~ 0
V~ ' 24.0 2~.0 2~ 8 1.~E+~ 3.52E+00 1.~E+~ 1.415 2.618 0 ~ ' ' 'm ~ ~ 8 1.~E+~ 3.52E+~ 1.~E~ 1.4~5 2.618 0
~ 250.0 25~.0 ' .5~ 8 2.~'E+01 2.~E+03 4.57E~01 1.415 ~.~ 0 m ~ ~ y~ 8 ' 2.69E+01 2.~E~ 4.~E+01 1.41~ ~).~ 0
II I I I I I I I I I I II I
M~ 0.2 2.0. ~:~f~ 2 1.00E~3 0.~E+~ 0.~E+~' 3.078 0.~1 ~ 0 -L~-~.~: 'm ~ ~ 2 1.00E~ t 0 ~E+~ 0.~E~ ~ .
TCLP Meals
I I'"ii .... I~'ill I I I I I I I I I I II I I I' I I ~11 III I I I / I I I / I I I I II
,~s:
Data I~ ~is ~a~ent ~s ~ bas~ on addia~ la~at~ ~ysis.
W-M~B.XLS P;~e I
· 8U~EA~Y OF LA~4~ATO~Y R E~ULT~
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS ON LABORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHASE - TITLE 22 METALS
CONSTITUENT STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (ALL DATA)
STLC 10x TTLC "~Act. No. of Sample .... t-value Upper 80% Calc. No of Above 'FI'LC .~'bove lox Nee(~ Mor~ A; Least
Total Metai$ .... Threshold STLC Threshold Samples, Mean Vadance Std. Dev. ! Std. Error (n-l) .... Conf. Umlt Samples Limit? STLC Limit? Samples ? ~ 4 SamPle,s,.?'
...Antim°n)' . 15.0... 150.0 500.. 12 4:80E+00 2.18E-01 4.67E-01 1.35E-01 ...1'356 4.983 . I no no no ye.s .....
,.. Arsenic 5.0 50.0 500 17 6.42E+00 1.36E+01 3.68E.+00 8.93E-0.1. 1.337 7.611 3 no ..... no no yes
Badum 100.01'I i000.0' '1000(~ 17 4.29E+02 1.38E+05 3.72E+02 9.01E+01 .... 1.337 . 549.186'... 3~158 no no yes yes
. Beryllium.. 0.8 ... 7.5 75 16 3.48E-01 4.18E-02 ."]2.04E-01 5.11E-02 1.341 0.417 ... 1 no no no yes
Cadmium 1.0 10.0 100 17 3.28E+00 3.91E+00 1..98E+00 4.80E-01 1.337 3.917 1 no no no yes
"- Chromium'.. 560.0 5600.0 2500 17 1.26E+02 3.32E+03 5.76E+01 1.40E+01 1.337 144.388 2... no ... no no ),es
Total Hexavalent Chro.mium 5.0 50.0 500 4 5.00E-01 0.00E+00_ 0:00E+00 0.00E+00 1.638 0.500 I no ... no no .... yes .
Cobalt 80.0 800.0 8000 16 6.39E+00 1.46E+01 3.82E+00 9.54E.01 1.341 7.671 1 no no no yes
'" . Copper ..... 25.0 250.0 2500 17 1.15E+02 "3.54E+03...j 5:95E+01 1.44E+01 1.337. 133.974' '29 no no yes y._e.~
Lead 5.0 50.0 1000 18 1.38E+02 4.50E+03 6.71E+01 1.58E+01 1.333 158.837 21 no yes.., yes .. yes
Mercury 20.0 200.0 20 12 1.58E+00 2.57E+00" 1160E+00 4.63E-0':1 1.356 2.210 1 no no no yes ...
Molybdenum '350.~" 3500.0" 3500 16 7.52E+00 2.69E",'01 5.18E+00 1.30E+00 1.341 9.258 1 no no no )'es
Nickel 20.0 200.0 2000 17 2.54E+01 7.13E+02 2.67E+01 6.48E+00 1.415 34.578. 349' no no yes yes
"Selenium 1.0 10.0 100.. 16 2.29E+00 6.35E.;-00. 2.52E+00 6.30E.0.1 1.341 3.138 1 no no no yes.
Silver 5.0 50.0 500 16 4.56E-01 1.48E.01 3.85E-01 9.62E.02 1.341 '0.585 1 no no no yes.
Thallium '7.0 70.0 700 16 6.44E+00 1.10E+00 1.05E+00 2.62E-01 1.341 6.788 1 no no no )'es
'Vanad.!um 24.(~" 240.0 2400 17 5.12E+01 3.98E+02. 2.00E+01 4.84E+00 1.415 58.091 5 no no .. no yes
Zinc 250.0 2500.0 5000 17 1.11E+03 3.95E+05 6.28E+02 1.52E+02 1.415 1325.279 4217 no no yes yes
Soluble Metals
'" Antimony. 15.0 ........ ' '..'.:,'=,':"i ~'' ' '" 3 .... 2.50E-01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 o.ooE+oo 1.886 0.250" 1 no ..... no no...
.... Arsenic 5.0 · .,~::~.~.~ 3 5100~[-01 0.00E+00. 0.00E+001 0.00E+O0 1.886 0.500 1 no ne ... no
I~adum 100.0 .. '~:~ 4 8.23E+00 9.80E+00. 3.13E+00 1.57E+00 1.638 10.789... 1 . . no. ........... no ),es
'Beryllium 0.8 ?' .~...' 3 5.00E-02 0.0OE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 .... 1.886 0.050 . . 1 no no no
Cadmium 1.0 ..'.. 3 1.67E.01 1.33E-02 .. 1.15E-01 6.67E-02 1.886 0.292 1 no . . no no ....
" Chromium I. 560.0 "'"!'~.' 3 2.57E+00 1.60E+00 1.27E+00 7.31E-01 1.886 3.945 1 no no no
'" Copper 25.0 ,,, -.' 3 2,33E-01 3.33E-03,, ~.77E*02 3.33E-O2 .,1.886 0.296 1 no no no
· Lead 5.0 : 17 2.56E+00 6.04E+00... 2.46E+00 5.96E-01 1.337 3.353 1 no no yes
Mo, I)~odenum ...... 350.0 .%,~;;, 3, 1.67E-01 1.33E-02 1.15E-.01 6.67E-02 .. 1.886 .... 0.292 1 . . no. .................... no no
Nickel 20.0 , , , · ....... 3 8.00E-01 2.70E-01 5.20E-01 3.00E-01 1.886. 1.366 1 no no no
Selenium 1.0 3 5.00E.01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.886 '~.500 1 no . ,no ..... no
Silver '5.0... '" .,, 3 5.00E-02 0.00E+00 0'i00E+00 0.00E+00 1.886 0.050 1 no no no
"T~allium .. 7.0 .., 3 5.00E-01 ..0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+0.0 1.886 0.500 1 no no no
.Vanadium 24.0 3 t.17E+00 3.03E-01 . .~.51E-01. 3.18E-01 1.886 1.766 I no no no
TCLP Metals ,,,
Chromium(TCLP, I 5.0 I 50.0 INAI 4 I 5.00E-02 1 0.00E+00'' 0.00E+0~, 0.00E+00 1 1~638 I ~.'0,~0I 1 I n~ I I n° I)'es
I Lea~l ITCLPI ' 5.0 50.0 NA ' 5 2.50E-01 0.00E+00 0.00E+001 0.00E+00 1.533 0.250 ' 0 IIII no - I no ~,es
Notes:
:or constituents that were not detected, 112 of the detection limit was used. L ' ' ' ]-- Not Applicable
~, = Data for this constituent has changed based on additional laborato~ analysis.
03/20/lgg8
S-METALB.XLS Page 1 10:25 AM
TABLE 13 (Revision 1)
SUMMARY OF SW 846
STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS OF LABORATORY RESULTS
SLUDGE PHASE - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
A~L No. of
Total Or~lanics
Benzene 14
1 ~.-Oiohlor~ane 4
benzene 11
Toluene 14
. X~lenes 14
4
Chlorinated PestickJes/PC_.,8 ~ 4
TCLP O~anlca
· 13~zen~ (I'CLP) 0.5 '
Other
Reactive ,~l~do 4
RoaO~ve
Flash Point
II II I
Noto~:
~For concentrations that worn not dotocl~. I~ t~ dot~on liml wa~ u~.
I, ~ Data lot ~ ~n,ti~ont has cha~
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (ALL DATA)
Conf Umlt
112.883
8.032
229.681
443.539
1320.815
970.254
2.986
Above TCLP
Umit?
I 5~00E-031 6.78E-2~ ! 823E-11 I 4.75E-11 I 1.886 I 0.005 no no no
III '111 I I II I I II I I
= not applicable
STATISTICAL~
At Least Act. No. of
14
4
1!
14
14
4
4
14
7
i . oE-Ol I 1.80E-02 I 1.34E-01 I 3.5eE'02 I
5.00E-b3 1 6.78E-2~ 'J 8.23E-11 I 4.751~-il I
IIIIII II I I
~ALlfS~s (WIn{OUT OUTUERS)
Conf Limit
112.883
8.032
229.681
443.539
1320.815
970.254
2.986
Above TCLP Need More At Least
Umlt?
1.886 ( 0.005 no no no
II I
S-ORGB. XLS
Page
3/19/98
10:17 PM
ENSR Consulting and Engineering
Letter of Transmittal
ATTENTION:
Mr. Howard Wines
City of Bakersfield Fire Department
Office of Environmental Services
1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93301
DATE:
January 23, 2001
PROJECT REFERENCE:
Rosedale Highway Property
Bakersfield, California
PROJECT NUMBER:
8727-049-REM
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
NO. ORIG NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION
1 Removal Action Workplan
REMARKS:
Enclosed is a copy of the above referenced Removal Action Workplan for the proposed Costco
Wholesale Property. Please feel free to contact us with any questions.
SIGNATURE:
Lita D. Freeman
Senior Project Manager
1420 Harbor Bay Parkway, Suite 120
Alameda, CA 94502
(510) 748-6700