HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION 11/1/1995STEVE McCALLEY, R.E.H.S.
DIRECTOR
COUNTY
2700 'M" Sb'eet, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 933O1
(805)861-3636
(805)861-3429 FAX
Environmental
Health
Services
Bepartment
November 1, 1995
COMPLAINT INSPECTION
6201 SCHIRRA CT.
SPICER WIRELINE SERVICES
UNIT # 4
DATE:
NARRATION BY:
4-4-95 Updated as required
Dan Starkey ~, Kern County Environmental Health
CONTACTS:
Greg Dufresne
Baker Hughes, Repair &
Maintenance
Charles R. Kennedy Baker Hughes, 'ASP, Health &
Safety Specialist
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY:
Spicer Wireline Services
P.O. Box 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Unit # 4, and SE Storage Area
Owner, Bobby Spicer
PROPERTY
OWNER:
Andre Family Trust -
PH # 871-5659
Spicer Wireline Yard
Baker Hughes - Baker Hughes Facility
Narration:
I met Dufresne and Kennedy at the Baker Hughes (BH) facility at
10:00 am on 4-4-95. We went to the southwest corner of the BH
property where we observed evidence that Spicer Wireline Service
(SWS) had been dumping oil along the fence line. SWS had also been
steam cleaning oilfield equipment which caused crude oil to be
blown onto BH equipment and property. BH also stated that this
activity is done after work and on the weekends. BH stated that we
could come on their property if needed to continue the
investigation and we could use the BH name as the complaining
party. I gave BH my business card and after hours phone number and
ask them to notify us when this activity occurred again.
I took photos of the waste on BH property and also photos of the
SWS yard. There was fresh oil stains on the asphalt, an open waste
oil container next to the fence, and a steam cleaner parked in the
yard. There was no one was at SWS unit # 4, or in the yard.
I left the BH facility at 10:45 am and drove next door to the
property in question. I spoke with a few tenants who stated that
SWS cleans their vehicles in the yard and water and oil run down
the gutter. These tenants also stated that they do these
activities after 5:00 pm and on the weekends.
I informed BH to notify this Department the next time SWS is steam
cleaning equipment.
On 5-10-95 I received a phone call from Dufresne who stated that
Spicer Wireline Service was in the process of steam cleaning their
oilfield equipment. I arrived at the site and discovered an
employee in the process of steam cleaning equipment. I informed
him that it was illegal to run contaminated water down the gutter.
He stated that he knew it was not right. He phoned the owner who
arrived within a few minutes. Bobby Spicer the owner and I
inspected the yard as I explained the violations observed. I
issued an NOV regarding the violations and explained our
Department's desire to obtain voluntary compliance. Spicer stated
that there would not be any more cleaning of oilfield equipment at
the yard. I informed him that he would only be billed for my time
if he complied. I photographed the site and left the facility.
I phoned Dufresne with Baker Hughes and informed him of the out
come of the inspection. I ask him to notify me if the
contamination was not cleaned up.
On 6-1-95 I received a phone call and fax from Dufresne stating
that he had not had any contact with the wireline company and that
the clean up was not complete.
I phoned Bobby Spicer and ask if he had removed the contaminated
soil from BH property. He stated that his crew had taken care of
that problem. He stated that he had not inspected the site. I ask
him to contact Dufresne personally and settle the issue.
On 6-7-95 I spoke with Dave Naugle with BH. He stated that to his
knowledge the waste oil spills had not been cleaned up and Dufresne
had not been contacted by Spicer. I informed Naugle that I would
reinspect the site and then contact Spicer. I arrived at the BH
facility at 1:30 p.m. and contacted Naugle. He gave me permission
to enter BH property and inspect the locations were the waste oil
had been spilled. The waste was still in the areas and had not
been cleaned up. It appeared that Spicer had placed dirt on the
spills from their side of the fence. Waste oil had not been placed
into a closed container. I drove to the Spicer office and placed
the second Notice Of Violation into the mail slot regarding the
waste oil spills and container. No one was present at the office.
(See N.O.V. attached). Spicer was given until 6-12-95 to comply
with the N.O.V.
On 6-12-95 I received a call from Spicer regarding the NOV and
sampling of the oil on BH property. He made arrangements to have
BC Labs take samples on 6-13-95 at 9:00 a.m.
I met Spicer and Mike Graham of BC labs at the BH site. Two
samples were taken of the oil contaminated soil. The first sample
from location % i and the second from locations % 2, 3 as
designated on the following drawing. The samples are to be
analyzed for C~m 22 Metals and %18.1 TPH Oil and Grease. Sampling
was complete at 9=30 a.m.
I received a copy of the analytical results on 6-29-95. I phoned
and advised Dufresne that the contaminated soil is not hazardous
and that I advised Spicer he needed to contact Dufresne to arrange
for the cleanup.
On 10-31-95 I received a phone call from Dufresne. He stated that
Spicer had removed the contaminated soil from along the west fence
line and requested that I inspect the site. I arrived at the site
at approximately 2:00 p.m. The contaminated soil was removed and
three depressions were present. Manney with Baker Hughes walked
over and ask if the work was adequate. I informed Manney that the
cleanup was complete and that this Department was satisfied that
the contamination had been removed. I ask Manney to relay that
message to Dufresne and stated that I would send a copy of my
report when complete. I contacted Spicer and he informed me that
the soil removed from BH was recycled and used as road base on the
Chevron Lost Hills Lease. Because the soil was classified as non-
hazardous the manifest requirements for transportation did not
apply. Complaint closed.
LOCATION OF SOIL CONTAMINATION
AND CORRESPONDING SAMPLES
ds/BakerH.cmp
STEVE McCALLEY
Director
RESOURCE ~!NT
DEPARTMENTAL
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
Tetepho~e (805) 961-3636
Telecopler (805) 861.3429
AGENCY
Date ~ ---7 -- (~ ~ .~ Underground Tank Facility #
Firm Name "~'~''~ ~'~'~<'~,' ~--'~'~-~' EPA I.D. #
Address ~;' ~- m ~ Assessors Parcel #
~ ~ Type Facility
Facility Address
Person Interviewed
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY
The following conditions or practices observed this date are violations of one or more sections of the California Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage,
handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or the Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8,
"Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances."
,Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below:
Your signature acknowledges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above, and is
not an admission of guilt.
·//! .-~-'"'f"-- ~ , er lega~'~qtior~y Co~n _W_oc.State officials.
Failure t.t~ ful~ this :'Notice and Order" may resul
Owner or Autttorized Representative
Hazardous Materials Sl:~ist
Willie -- Original
C~laW -- Facility file · ·
LABORATORIES
SPICER WIRELINE
P.O. BOX 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Attn: BOB SPICER 834-9795
Sample Description:
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Date Report d: 06/22/95
· I
Date Received: 06/13/95
Laboratory No.: 95-07101-1
AP, EA $1 - 0 - 6" SAMPLED BY ~ GRAHAM
Sampling Date/Time: 06/13/95 ~ 09:10AM
Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid
Page !
Constituents
Oil and Grease
Sample Results Units
1900. mg/kg
California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
cc: KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HE~LLTH DEPT
DAN STAR/fY
Method
D.Q.L.
20.
Method
EPA-413.!
All results listed in tills report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. ~C La~oratories. Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or tmrd ~arty interpretation,
LABORATORIES Page 1
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
SPICER WIRELINE
P.O. BOX 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Attn: BOB SPICER 834-9795
Date Reported: 06/22/95
Date Received: 06/13/95
Laboratory No.: 95-07101-2
Sample Description: ~JLEA ~2&~3-0-6" COMPOSITE SA~IPLED BY MIKE GRAHAM
Sampling Date/Time: 06/13/95 ~ 09:30AM
Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid
Method
Constituents Sample Results Units P.Q.L.
Oil and Grease - 16000. mg/kg 20.
Method
EPA-413.1
California D.0.H.S. Cert. 51186
Stuart G. Buttram
Department Supervisor
cc: KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT - DAN STAR/KY
All results listed in ,'his report are for the exclusive use of the submitting partT. BC Laboratories. Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detacl~ment or third ~arty interpretation.
LABORATORIES
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Page
SPICER WIRELINE
P.O. BOX 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Attn: BOB SPICER 834-9795
Date Reported: 06/20/95
Date Received: 06/13/95
Laboratory No.: 95-07101-1
Sample Description: ~ %1-0-6" SA/~PLED BY MIKE GRAHAM
Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid
Method
Constituents - SamDle Results Units P.Q.L.
Method
Regulator~;
Criteria
STLC TTLC
mq/L mc/kc
Antimony None Detected mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 15. 500
Arsenic 5.7 mg/kg 0.5 SW-7060 5.0 500
Barium 78. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 100. 10000
Beryllium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75 75
Cadmium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 1.0 I00
Chromium 8.8 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 560. 2500
Cobalt 3,5 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 80. 8000
Copper 8,4 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 25. 2500
Lead 7.8 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000
Mercury None Detected mg/kg 0.2 SW-7471 0.2 20
Molybdenum None Detected mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 350. 3500
Nickel 5,3 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 20. 2000
Selenium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-7740 1.0 100
Silver None Detected mg/kg 1.0 SW-6010 5.0 500
Thallium None Detected mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 7.0 700
Vanadium. 23. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 24. 2400
Zinc 79. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000
Comment:
Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P .Q.L. =
STLC =
TTLC --
Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte
quantifiable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA~SW-846, September, 1986.
Dan Schultz
Laboratory Director
cc: KERN COU57FY ENVIROATM~NTAL HEALTH DEPT DAN ST~M~KY
All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party. EC ,ahora~ories. Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party interpre;a::cc
LABORATORIES
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
(California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 66261)
Page
SPICER WIRELINE
P.O. BOX 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Attn: BOB SPICER 834-9795
Date Reported: 06/20/95
Date Received: 06/13/95
Laboratory No.: 95-07101-2
Sample Description: AREA ~2&~3-0-6" COMPOSITE SAMPLED BY MIKE GRAHAM
Title 22 Waste Type: Type i: Millable Solid - No Free Liquid
Method
Constituents - SamDle Results Units P.Q.L. Method
Regulatory
Criteria
STLC TTLC
mq/L mq/kq
Antimony None Detected mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 15. 500.
Arsenic 3.8 mg/kg 0.5 SW-7060 5.0 500.
Barium 61. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 100. 10000.
Beryllium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 0.75 75.
Cadmium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 1.0 100.
Chromium 7.3 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 560. 2500.
Cobalt 3.4 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 80. 8000.
Copper 5.9 mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 25. 2500.
Lead 3.1 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 5.0 1000.
Mercury None Detected mg/kg 0.2 SW-7471 0.2 20.
Molybdenum None Detected mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 350. 3500.
Nickel 4.1 mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 20. 2000.
Selenium None Detected mg/kg 0.5 SW-7740 1.0 100.
Silver None Detected mg/kg 1.0 SW-6010 5.0 500.
Thallium None Detected mg/kg 5.0 SW-6010 7.0 700.
Vanadium 21. mg/kg 0.5 SW-6010 24. 2400.
Zinc 29. mg/kg 2.5 SW-6010 250. 5000.
Comment:
Ail above constituents are reported on an as received (wet) sample basis.
Results reported represent totals (TTLC) as sample subjected to appropriate
techniques to determine total levels.
P .Q.L. =
STLC =
TTLC =
Practical Quantitation Limit (refers to the least amount of analyte
quantifiable based on sample size used and analytical technique employed).
Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
REFERENCES:
SW = "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical/Chemical Methods",
EPA-SW-846, September, 1986.
Dan Schultz
Laboratory Director
cc: KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT - DAN STAR/KY
~ll results listea in this repor~ are for the exctusive use of the submitting party. BC Laboratories. Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, separation, detachment or third party interpretation,
Report To:
Addres..
State:
Attn:
Phone:
Sample Description
Project:
Project fh
Sampler Name:
Other:
Date & Time Sampled
~ ~ t--
~O ZO
Comment:
Sa.mple
Name:
Address
City
Billing Info:
Received by: (Signature) Date: Tim(
...............
by: (~ ignature) Received by'. (Signature) D~te: Tim(
Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
Date: Tim(
Date: Tirm
Attention:
Time: < i~::ir ~Z.
Miles:
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received. by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
Date: Tim~
Date: Tim,
P.O.#
State
Relinquished by: (Signature)
~1 BC Disposal @ 5.00 ea.
~ Return lo client
BC LABORATORIES
$~vlPLE RECEIPT FORM
SHIPPING SPECIFICATIONS
Federal Express []
BC Lab Field Service
UPS [] Hand Delivery []
Other [] (Specify)
SHIPPING CONTAINER
Ice Chest~' Box []
None [] Other [] (Specify)
SAMPLE CONDITION
Ice]~ Blue Ice [] None [] If temperature is not between 2 and 6 C please explain:
Custody Seals: Ice Chest [] Containers [] NoneS/
All samples received? Yes ~ No [] All samples intact? Yes~,' No []
Description match COC? Yes'~ No ' []
Sample #
QT PE UNP
PT PE UNP
QT INORGANIC METALS
I'T INORGANIC METALS
CN
N FORMS
SULFIDE
NO.NO,
TOC
T¢IX
CDD
PIIENOL
TRIP B L/uN'K
VOA VIAL
VOA SET
OIL & GREASE
ODOR
RADIOLOGICAL
BAC~F
504
507
508/60818080
515.1/8150
$~/6~/8270
547
531.1
548
549
Q A/Q C
~T AMBER
8 OZ. JAR
32 OZ. JAR
St)IL SLEEVE
SAMPLE CONTAINERS
Collllllelll~:
II',tTEQ
6117 Schirra Court Bakers~'ietd, CA
805-834-9654 Fax: 805-834.24,50
P.1
Mr. Dan Starkey, REHS
Kern County Environmental Health Services
2700 "M" Street, #300
Bakersfield, California 93301
Dan:
1 June 95
,;
I'm writing to advise that the party responsible for waste oil and contamination from the property
next to ours has yet to contact me personally. This is regarding clean.up you told me he would
be responsible for. The offending business was California Wireline Service.
I need your assistance in moving this off center and getting the contamination PROPERLY re.
moved from BHI property. BH! will accept only a certified clean-up and disposal by CWS.
BHI spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on environmental issues to keep our properties
in line at over 250 facilities world wide. I will not have a company that has so bJatentty violated
EPA issues contaminate a property that we make every effort to keep environmentally clean.
Additionally, I need the report you wrote on this incident you'd said I would receive. To date,
have nothing from Kern County on this. I need this for my files and follow-up.
Your timely attention to this matter is appreciated. Please contact me for any further details.
Thank-you.
Gr~g Dufres~, BHI West Coast
HSE Co-Ordinator
cc: Jim Van Hoozen
cwscln
STEVE McCAt. LEY
Director
Date
Firm Name
Address
'RESOURCE
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Facility Address
Person Interviewed
Underground Tank Facility #
EPA I.D. #
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield. CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
Assessors Parcel #
~ /--/ Type Facility
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY ·
The following conditions or practices observed this date are violations of one or more sections of the California Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage,
handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or the Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8,
"Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances."
~Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below:
/
/
Your signature acknowledges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above, and is
not an admission of guilt.
Failure ,~z~ fully co:.m~ this "Notice and Order" may result/in'urger lega[,~,.~~_ar_State officials.
White -- Original Owner or Authorized Representative Hazardous Materials Speci~ist
Canary - Facility file
/
Pink -- Specialist
Environmental Health 580 4113 120 (~ev. 2/90)
COMPLAINT INSPECTION
6201SCHIRRA CT.
SPICER WIRELINE SERVICES
DATE: 4-4-95
NARRATION BY: Dan Starkey
CONTACTS:
Greg Dufresne
Baker Hughes,
Maintenance
Repair &
Charles R. Kennedy Baker Hughes, ASP,
Safety Specialist
Health
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY:
Spicer Wireline Services
P.O. Box 41046
Bakersfield, CA 93384
Unit # 4, and SE Storage Area
PROPERTY
OWNER:
Andre Family Trust
PM # 871-565.9
Narration:
I met Dufresne and Kennedy at the Baker Hughes (BM) facility at
10:00 am on' 4-4-95. We went to the southwest corner of the BM
property were we observed evidence were Spicer Wireline Service
(SWS) had been dumping oil along the fence line. SWS had also been
steam cleaning oilfield equipment and the waste was blown onto the
BH equipment and property. BH also stated that this activity is
done after work and on the weekends. BM stated that we could come
on their property if needed to continue the investigation and 'we
could use the BM name as the complaining party. I gave BH my
business card and after hours phone number and ask them to notify
us when this activity occurred again.
I took photos of the waste on BH property and also photos of the
SWS yard. There was fresh oil stains on the asphalt, an open waste
oil container next to the fence, and a steam cleaner parked in the
yard. No one was at SWS unit ~ 4, or in the yard.
I left the BM facility at 10:45 am and drove next door to the
property in question. I spoke with a few tenants who stated that
SWS cleans their vehicles in the yard and water and oil run down
the gutter. These tenants also stated that they do these
activities after 5:00 pm and on the weekends.
STATUS
Waiting on BH to notify us that SWS is steam cleaning equipment,
Pitts notified.
On 5-10-95 I received a phone call from Dufresne who stated that
Spicer Wireline Service was in the process of steam cleaning their
oilfield equipment. I arrived at the site and an employee was in
the process of steam cleaning equipment. I informed him that it
was illegal to run contaminated water down the gutter. He stated
that he knew it was not right. He phoned the owner who arrived
after a few minutes. Bobby Spicer the owner and.I inspected the
yard as I explained the violations I observed. I issued an NOV
regarding the violations and explained that our Department wanted
compliance. Spicer stated that there would not be any more
cleaning of oilfield equipment at the yard. I informed him that he
would only be billed for my time if he complied. I photographed
the site and left the facility.
I phoned Dufresne with Baker Hughes and informed him of the out
come of the inspection. Case closed.
ds/BakerH.¢mp
.... STEVE/McCALLEY
Director
· 2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone (805) 861-3636
Telecopler (805) 861-3429
RESOURCE NT AGENCY'
DEPARTMENTAL
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS-'M-ANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Date ~ "- /
Firm Name
Address P.
Facility Address
Person Interviewed
Underground Tank Facility #
EPA I..D. #
Assessors Parcel
Type Facility ~
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY
The following conditions or practices observed this date are violations of one or more sections of the California Health
and Safety Code, Div. 20, or the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Chap. 30, relating to the "storage,
handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste" or the Ordinance Code of Kern County, Div. 8,
"Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances."
Conditions or practices must be corrected within the times ordered below:
Your signature acknowledges receipt of a copy of this report and collection of any samples described above, and is
not an admission of guilt.
Failure to fully comply with this "Notice and Order" may result in further le~P~:~by..~unty or State o~ficials.
I.... ':..; t "/--
.... -": "::?:- ...... .;'-,
· ,-~'"'" ' '~-;:.'Own~'~(Jr--Authorized Representative Hazardous Matfirials Speciali'~i
White -- Origin~'i _..~""
Canary -- Facility file
Pink -- Specialist
Enwronmental Heeltl~ 580 4113 120 (Rev. 2/90)