HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION (6)
,
,,I
I
~
~
r:
May 27,2004
SUBJECT: Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report,
Report of VES Startup and
Remediation Status Report
Former Niagara Car Wash
1700 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
f
.
f
~
~
à'
~"
!
~
~
~
M
"
f:
~.
~
~
Mr. Frank Hobin
8908 Versailles Dr.
Bakersfield, CA 93311
Dear Mr. Hobin:
This report presents the Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Former
Niagara Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield, California. This work
was conducted in response to the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board -
Central Valley Region (RRWQCB) letter dated August 26, 2003. On May 14, 2004, the site
remediation system was started. This report documents the startup and the remediation status for
the Site.
Respectfully Submitted,
E2C Remediation
111 < .....
William A. Lawson, R.G.
Senior Geologist '
I
I:
t·
I.,
t
,
},
Ii
f
r
,
w
¡
f
cc: Mr. John Whiting, R.G.
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region
1685 E Street
Fresno, CA 93706-2020
Mr. Howard H. Wines III, R.G.
Hazardous Materials Specialist
City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
j
!
!
¡
\
},
tl
\
.
!.
i
t
.-
f'
Environmental Engineering Consulting & Remediation, Inc, dba E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105, Bakersfield, CA 93313 p: 661,831 .6906 f: 661 ,831 .6234
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECOND QUARTER 2004
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT,
REPORT OF VES STARTUP
AND
REMEDIATION STATUS REPORT
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 STINE ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
May 27, 2004
Project Number 1812BK01
Prepared For:
Mr. Frank Hobin
8908 Versailles Dr.
Bakersfield, CA 93311
Prepared By:
E2C Remediation
Environmental/Engineering Consultants
5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 1812BK03,
Mav 27. 2004
TABLE:"OF CONTENTS"
TABLE OF CONTENTS............... .............. ................................................... .......... ......... ............... i
LIST OF FIG U RES................................................,......................................................................... ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARy........................................................................................................ ....... ..1
Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring........................................................1
Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data......... ......................................... ........................ .......1
Summary of Remediation Status .......... .......... ........ ............. ................ ............ .............................1
Conclusions... ..... ...... ............... .......... ......... .., .... ....... ..... ........... ....................................................1
Recommendations..................................... .................................................................................. ..2
1.0 I NTRO DUCT ION .......................... ........ ... ...... ..... ..... ..... .......... ............................ .... ......... ....3
1.1 Site Description.............. ........... ...... ........................................................ ........................ ...3
1.2 Site Hydrogeology.............................................................................................................3
1.3 Site History ................................. ....................... ....... .......... ...... ....... ................. .................3
2.0 SECOND QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ........................................4
2.1 Groundwater Elevations................................................................................................. ...4
2.2 Groundwater Purging and Sampling... .................... .............. ........ .......... .... .... ............ .......4
2.3 Groundwater Analyses...........::................................................................................ ...... ...4
2.4 Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Data.....................................4
2.5 Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data ......................................................................5
2.6 Electronic Submittal of Groundwater Analytical Data.........................................................5
3.0 REPORT OF VES STARTUP.................... ............................. ......................................... ....5
4.0 REM EDlA TION STATUS REPORT ........ ..................... ................. ......... ....... ......................6
4.1 Ongoing System Operations ..................................... ................ .......................................6
4.1.1 Thermal Oxidizer.. .................................................... ...... ................. ..... .~............ ........6
4.2 Compliance with SJVAPCD Permit To Operate ...............................................................6
4.3 Fuel Hydrocarbon Mass Removal Rates........................... ........................................ ....... 7
4.4 Discussion of Remedial Efficiency................................................ ...................... ..... ,.......... 7
5.0 CO N C L US ION S............................................................................ ...................................... 7
6.0 R E COM M EN DATION S ................................................................................................... ....8
7.0 LlM ITA TIONS AND REPORT CERTIFiCATION........... ......... ... .................................. .......9
E2C:Remediation
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 5
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Mav 27 2004
LIST OF FIGURES
Site Location Map
Site Plan
Second Quarter 2004 Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater MtBE Isoconcentration Plot
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Supplemental Groundwater Analyses Data
LIST OF APPENDICES
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Report
Second Quarter 2004 Purge Water Manifest
AB 2886 Electronic Delivery Upload Confirmation Reports
E2C Remediation
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
EXEcunVE SUMMAR·Y.
E2C Remediation (E2C) has completed the Second Quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event
for the Former Niagara Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield,
California. This document documents the monitoring activities. On May 14, 2004 the site
remediation system (vapor extraction system, or VES) was started. This report documents the
VES startup and presents the Remediation Status Report for the Site.
Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring
On April 23, 2004, groundwater was monitored and sampled at the Site. The groundwater
samples were chemically analyzed at a State of California-Certified analytical laboratory for the
fuel hydrocarbon constituents of Total Petro.leum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), the aromatic
compounds of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (total) (BTEX), the five fuel
oxygenates of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MtBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA; a.k.a. tert-butanol),
di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary amyl methyl ether
(TAME), and the lead scavengers of 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromoethane
(EDB; a.k.a. ethylene dibromide).
Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data
Based on the groundwater analytical data to date, groundwater beneath the Site has been
minimally impacted by MtBE (maximum' concentration in Second Quarter 2004 of 21 micrograms
per liter, or µg/L). MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume
and MW-3 is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume. Due to the low
concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it may not be necessary to
conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing downgradient wells are located
at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume.
Summary of Remediation Status
The vapor extraction system (VES) was brought on line on May 14, 2004 and has operated
continuously since. The VES has removed approximately 2,470 pounds (Ibs), which calculates
to approximately 360 Ibs/day.
Conclusions
Based on the site assessment work and groundwater monitoring data obtained at the Site to date,
E2C concludes the following:
· The groundwater flow direction and gradient beneath the Site is not known, however
based on the configuration of the limited fuel hydrocarbon impact to groundwater, the flow
direction is estimated as southerly;
· Pumping from nearby water wells, specifically CWS 158-01, and recharge from the Stine
Canal could influence groundwater flow beneath the Site;
· Principal fuel hydrocarbon impact to soils is in the Source Area, the former UST cluster;
· Groundwater beneath the Site has been minimally impacted, based on reported low
concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater samples;
· MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume and MW-3
is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume;
· Due to the low concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it
may not be necessary to conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing
downgradient wells are located at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume and
the remediation system has been brought on line;
· The site remediation system (VES) was brought on line on May 14, 2004. Over the initial
thirteen (13) days of operations the system operated for approximately seven (7) days
as an imbalance in the propane pressure system caused intermittent machine shutdown
(note: this problem has been repaired and the system is now operating continuously);
E2C Remediation
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
·
MtBE has been reported in groundwater at low. concentrations. A such, MtBE should be
added to the YES influent/effluent sampling and analysis regimen to evaluate MtBE
removal trends;
YES influent/effluent samples should be collected and analyzed on a monthly basis to
assist in evaluation of fuel hydrocarbon removal rates and remedial trends; and
A significant mass of fuel hydrocarbons (approximately 2,470 Ibs, or approximately 390
gallons of fuel) was removed from the subsurface during the short initial YES operational
period.
·
·
Recommendations
Based on the data presented in this report and the above conclusions, E2C makes the following
recommendations:
· Have the Site surveyed to include monitoring well locations for latitude, longitude and
elevation;
· Continue groundwater monitoring and sampling on a quarterly basis;
· Analyze groundwater samples for BTEX and five fuel oxygenates using EPA Method
8260B and for TPHg using EPA Method 8015M;
· Analyze groundwater samples for 1,2-DCA and EDB for one (1) additional quarter. If
these compounds continue to be reported as non-detect, a recommendation will be made
to discontinue these analyses;
· Discontinue the analyses for lead and the supplemental groundwater parameters;
· Amend the YES influent sampling and analysis regiment to include MtBE (analyses for
TPHg, BTEX and MtBE) and monthly collection and analysis of samples;
· During the initial 'debugging' operational period for the YES, collect influent/effluent
samples to verify that the equipment will meet SJV APCD PTU conditions;
· Continue to operate the YES with weekly maintenance visits and after approximately 30
days conduct the SJV APCD Startup Inspection with influent/effluent compliance sampling
and Startup Inspection Test reporting; and
· If fuel hydrocarbon compounds increase in concentration and persist in groundwater at
MW-3 and/or MW-1, this data will be evaluated and, if warranted, a Workplan for
Additional Downgradient Groundwater Characterization with installation of additional
well(s) may be submitted at a later date.
E2C Remediation
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
ProiectNumber, 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
1.0 IN"fRODUCTlON
E2C Remediation (E2C) has completed the Second Quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event
for the Former Niagara Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield,
California. This report documents the groundwater monitoring activities and the results. On May
14, 2004 the site remediation system (vapor extraction system, or VES) was started. This report
documents the startup activities. In addition, the Remediation Status Report for the Site is
presented. The work was performed in accordance with the State of California Regional Water
Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB) letter dated August 26, 2003.
1.1 Site Description
The Site is a currently operating car wash (Whitewater Car Wash) located in Bakersfield,
California, at 1700 Stine Road between Stine Road and Hasti Acres Drive (see Figure 1 for Site
Location Map). The Site encompasses approximately 1.7 acres and is located approximately
200 feet south of Ming Avenue. The Site is located in Section 11, Township 30 South, Range 27
East MDBM.
Three (3) 12,OOO-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) were located as shown on
Figure 2 (Site Plan). The USTs were removed in April 2003. The fuel dispensers under the
canopy area have also been removed along with the associated piping. One (1) 2,000-gallon
waste oil UST is still located at the Site as shown on Figure 2.
1.2 Site Hydrogeology
Regionally, the depth to groundwater had been estimated at approximately 190 feet bgs
according to the 1996 Water Supply Report published by the Kern County Water Agency.
During March 2003 drilling activities, first encountered groundwater was found at a depth of
approximately 163 feet bgs. In September 2003 groundwater was encountered at
approximately168 feet bgs.
The surrounding area well survey identified four (4) production wells within a 2,500-foot radius of
the Site. All of these wells were noted to be operating during a field reconnaissance.
The Stine Canal (irrigation and runoff) traverses the Site from northeast to southwest between
the carwash building and Stine Road. The canal continues beneath the Site as a concrete pipe
culvert which extends from north of Ming Avenue to the southern boundary of the Site. The canal
is an unlined channel to the south of the Site. Water was observed to be flowing in the canal
during a field reconnaissance.
1.3 Site History
A detailed Site History was discussed in the June 17, 2003 report, 'Site Characterization Report
of Findings, Report of Surrounding Area Well Survey, SVE System Installation and Pilot Test
Reporl of Findings & Work plan to Implement Remedial Action, Former Niagara Car Wash, 1701
Stine Road, Bakersfield, California' (IRAP).
In March 2003, E2C installed one (1) groundwater monitoring well to assess groundwater
conditions at the Site. In addition two (2) dual completion VE wells and one (1) single completion
VE well were installed. Finally, two (2) 40-foot soil borings were advanced on either side of the
dispenser islands. Upon completion of the well installations, trenches were excavated and the
wells were plumbed to a manifold by the equipment area. Upon completion of plumbing, the
trenches were backfilled and completed with concrete caps. This work was reported in the Site
Characterization Report of Findings dated June 17, 2003. Based on their review of this work, the
RWQCB requested additional groundwater characterization in a letter, dated August 26, 2003.
Groundwater monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 were installed during the week of September 28,
2003, after which the wells were developed. Initial groundwater monitoring/sampling was
conducted at the new wells in October 2003 and that data was reported in the Fourth Quarter
2003 Groundwater Monitoring Report.
E2C Remediation
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
2:0' SECÖND" QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWA TER MONITORING
The following sections describe for the groundwater monitoring and sampling activities conducted
by E2C Remediation (E2C) on April 23, 2004, which represented the Second Quarter 2004.
2.1 Groundwater Elevations
The initial task performed was checking the well for presence of free-product using a clear bailer.
Free-product was not present in any well. The depth of freestanding groundwater was then
measured to the nearest one-hundredth (0.01) of a foot using a Solinst water level indicator and
an attached measuring tape. The equipment was washed with Alconox soap and double rinsed
prior to each use.
Currently, a licensed surveyor is being contracted to survey the wells to comply with State of
California Assembly Bill AB2866 (AB2886). It is anticipated that surveying will be completed late
in the Second Quarter 2004. However, a southerly groundwater flow direction can be interpreted
(see Figure 3A) based on the groundwater chemical data. Second Quarter 2004 groundwater
monitoring data are summarized in Table 1A and are summarized with historical groundwater
elevation data in Table 2.
2.2 Groundwater Purging and Sampling
Groundwater was purged at the monitoring well using a bailer. A minimum of 3 casing volumes
was removed from the well prior to sampling groundwater. A casing volume is calculated b y
multiplying the height of the freestanding water column in the well by the cross-sectional area of
the well casing. The temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were measured
periodically to verify sufficient purging indicated by stable measurements on field instruments.
When the measurements were within 10% of each other, groundwater in the well was considered
stable for sampling (see Appendix A for groundwater purge data sheets). .
Each sample was collected using a new disposable bailer. Liquid in the bailer was decanted into
two 40-milliliter volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials. Each VOA was sealed using a tight fitting
Teflon-lined screw cap. Care was taken so that no headspace or bubbles existed after sealing
each VOA with the lid. All samples were labeled and documented on a Chain-of-Custody record
immediately after sealing. The samples were placed into an iced cooler maintained at 4°
Centigrade for transport to the analytical laboratory. Note: The sample labeled MW-4 on the
Chain-of-Custody is a duplicate of the sample from MW-3.
2.3 Groundwater Analyses
· Groundwater samples were transported to and analyzed at Halcyon Laboratories (State
Certification #1920) in accordance with State guidelines and EPA protocols for Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) using EPA Method 8015M, volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8260b full-scan, which include the volatile
aromatics of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), the five fuel
oxygenates of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MtBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA; a.k.a. tert-
butanol), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary-amyl
ether (TAME, and for the lead scavengers of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-
dibromomethane (EDB; a.k.a. ethylene dibromide) using EPA Method 8260b.
2.4 Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Data
The current analytical are presented in tabular form in Table 1 and with historical analytical data in
Table 3. The analytical laboratory report for the Second Quarter 2004 is included as Appendix B.
January 22,2004 groundwater analytical data are summarized below:
· BTEX compounds were reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· TPHg was reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· MtBE was reported at each of the three (3) monitoring wells with the maximum
concentration (21 µg/L) (duplicate sample) reported at MW-3 (see Figure 4);
E2C Remediation
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number. 18·12BK03
Mav 27. 2004
· TAME, TBA, DIPE, and ETBE were reported as non-detect at all three (3fwells;and
· 1 ,2-DCA and EDB were reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells.
2.5 Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data
Based on the groundwater analytical data to date, groundwater beneath the Site has been
minimally impacted by MtBE (maximum concentration in Second Quarter 2004 of 21 micrograms
per liter, or µg/L). MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume
and MW-3 is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume. Due to the low
concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it may not be necessary to
conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing downgradient wells are located
at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume.
2.6 Electronic Submittal of Groundwater Analytical Data
In accordance with AB2886 groundwater analytical data are submitted electronically to the State
GeoTracker database. Data for the Second Quarter 2003 through the Second Quarter 2004
have been submitted (see Appendix D for copies of AB2886 Electronic Delivery Reports).
3.0 REPORT OF YES STARTUP
A SJV APCD Authority To Construct application for the remediation equipment was prepared and
submitted by E2C in July 2003. The application was approved in August 2003 by letter. PG&E
was contacted to obtain an estimate of costs and installation schedule to supply electrical power.
Based on the PG&E cost estimate (>$20,000) and the estimate for time to complete
(approximately six months at a minimum), E2C explored other power supply options. Based on
this research, E2C opted to purchase a propane generator-powered thermal oxidizer. In addition,
a Request for Modification to the Permit To Operate was submitted to the SJV APCD for their
review on an expedited basis.
In late November 2003 E2C was made aware of a new State Cleanup Fund (Fund) policy
regarding equipment purchase and leasing. This policy requires pre-approval of costs for
equipment purchase. E2C prepared and submitted the Request for Pre-Approval, which was
approved by the Fund in January 2004. E2C then contracted Baker Furnace to construct the
equipment. The equipment was delivered in late April 2004 to the generator construction
contractor, PTS in Bakersfield, California. PTS had previously designed the generator and
commenced construction. PTS mounted the generator onto the equipment trailer and wired the
generator into the thermal oxidizer unit. At the same time, E2C constructed the equipment
enclosure at the Site.
During the period of May 3 through May 10, 2004, E2C personnel performed the following tasks:
· Set bollards in concrete to protect the propane fuel tank;
· Constructed the equipment enclosure; and
· Set the propane tank and plumbed a gas line to the equipment trailer location.
On May 13, 2004, the equipment was mobilized to the Site and connected to the fuel source via
the gas line. The equipment was then started. A period of debugging ensued throughout May
13, 2004 and on May 14, 2004 full-scale VES operation commenced. Note: Mr. John Whiting of
the RWQCB was onsite on May 13, 2004 to observe the beginning proceedings.
The VES will be operated for a period of approximately thirty (30) days to allow the equipment to
stabilize (i.e., 'work out the bugs') and to verify that the equipment will meet SJV APCD permit
conditions. The SJV APCD Startup Inspection will then be scheduled and conducted with
subsequent reporting. Full-scale long-term remedial operations will then proceed. The Site will be
visited on a weekly basis to maintain the equipment and record remedial system parameters.
These parameters will be used to calculate the efficiency of the equipment, the fuel hydrocarbon
removal rates, and the massoffuel hydrocarbons rêmoved.
EzC Remediation
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 18-12BK03'
Mav 27. 2004
4.0 REMEOIAT/ON STA TUS' REPORT
Remedial operations at the Site are conducted using a vapor extraction system (VES). To date,
five (5) vapor extraction (V E) wells have been installed at the Site. Two (2) of the VE wells
(VES-AD and VES-BD) are screened deep (approximately 75 to 110 feet bgs), two (2) (VES-AS
and VES-BS) are screened shallow (approximately 10 to 75 feet bgs) and one (1) (VES-C) is
screened at medium depth (approximately 55 to 85 feet bgs).
On May 14, 2004, the VES equipment (Baker Fumace 250-CFM Thermal/catalytic Oxidizer with
propane-powered generator) was brought on line. The system is currently running with VES-AS,
VES-BS, and VES-C open with VES-AD and VES-BD closed. This wellfield configuration is
yielding the highest influent concentration. The wellfield configuration will be continuously
adjusted throughout the course of remedial operations on a weekly basis to optimize the system
effectiveness.
Note: During the first ten (13) days of system operation, the oxidizer shut down intermittently due
to low temperature or low pressure so that only seven (7) days of actual runtime were achieved.
This problem has been repaired and the system is now operating continuously.
4.1 Ongoing System Operations
4.1.1 Thermal Oxidizer
The remedial machine is a Baker Fumace 250-CFM thermal oxidizer capable of adding a modular
catalytic cell as concentrations fall. The unit's minimum operating temperature in thermal mode is
1,400 deg. F. This temperature is set to ensure vapor oxidation at reasonable electrical unit cost
via the propane-powered generator. The unit is equipped with a regenerative or PO type vapor
extraction blower. For improved reliability and safety, the valve controls, actuators, and
components are controlled by relay logic. The unit is equipped with a water knockout pot,
automatic air dilution capability, and a noise-reducing muffler.
This equipment is designed to shut down and lock out in the event of a system malfunction. The
various safety features include high and low oxidizer bed temperatures, high and low blower
pressure, high intake LEL, high and low air pressure, high and low exhaust temperature, and
water knockout malfunction sensor. At least 99% destruction efficiency is stated in the
manufacturer's specifications for the unit.
The remediation equipment will be monitored on a weekly basis to perform routine maintenance,
record oxidizer parameters (temperature, flow rate and operating hours) and measure influent and
effluent hydrocarbon concentrations. Although the oxidizer parameters are continuously recorded
digitally on a Zip disk, weekly monitoring of these parameters ensures accuracy of the measuring
devices. Hydrocarbon concentrations are measured with a portable hydrogen flame ionization
detector (FID) and the data are used in applicable formulas to calculate the mass of hydrocarbons
removed on both a monthly and cumulative basis .
Adjustments are continually made to the configuration of the unit to maximize vapor flow from the
well field while maintaining the chamber temperature above 1 ,400 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) as
required in the SJV APCD permit and below the manufacturer's recommended temperature limit of
1,850 ºF in the stack. During the initial day of operation, it was necessary adjust the wellfield
configuration (two wells off) to allow for maximum influent concentration.
4.2 Compliance with SJV APCD Permit To Operate
Ongoing compliance is demonstrated by monitoring of the influent and effluent streams with a FID
or PID instrument during regular system operations and weekly monitoring visits. From May 14
through May 24, 2004, the influent averaged 4,800 ppmv with 'zero' effluent. This equates to
100% destruction efficiency.
E2C Remediation
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proieet Number 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
The YES system will be operated for approximately 30 days prior to scheduling the SJV APCD
Startup Inspection. This time will be used to 'debug' and stabilize the system. In addition,
influent/effluent samples will be collected to verify that the equipment will meet SJV APCD PTO
conditions. After approximately 30 days of initial operation, the SJV APCD Startup Inspection will
be scheduled and conducted. Compliance influent/effluent samples will be collected at that time.
Field records including sampling results, cumulative runtime, flow rate and catalytic oxidizer
temperature will be maintained and retained for a minimum of two (2) years. System operation
temperature will be maintained at a minimum of 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) in the combustion
chamber of the thermal oxidizer.
4.3 Fuel Hydrocarbon Mass Removal Rates
Hydrocarbon removal rates can be calculated using different influent parameters. The first method
uses a straight-line extrapolation of influent measurements based on actual hourly run-time.
Based on this method, the mass of fuel hydrocarbons removed for the initial ten (13) days of
operation can be calculated at approximately 2,350 pounds (Ibs) (see Table 4)
The second method uses the average influent over the average daily run-time per month. Based
on this method, the total mass of fuel hydrocarbons removed from startup through May 27, 2004
can be calculated at approximately 2,5~0 Ibs (see Table 5).
Finally, the average of the above methods can be used, which yields an approximate mass
removed of 2,470 Ibs, which equates to approximately 390 gallons of fuel.
Note: MtBE has been reported at low concentrations in groundwater at the Site. Curr.ently, the
machine influent/effluent approved sampling and analysis plan calls for TPHg and BTEX
analyses. MtBE analysis should be added to this regimen to allow for assessment of MtBE
remediation trends. In addition, influent samples should be collected via Tedlar® bags and
analyzed on a monthly basis to assist in evaluation of removal rates and trends.
4.4 Discussion of Remedial Efficiency
A significant quantity of fuel hydrocarbons was removed during the initial thirteen (13) days of
YES operations (seven days of actual runtime). The average flow rate was approximately 251
SCFM and the average influent concentration was approximately 4,450 ppmv. This equates to a
removal rate of approximately 360 Ibs/day.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the site assessment work and groundwater monitoring data obtained at the Site to date,
E2C concludes the following:
· The groundwater flow direction and gradient beneath the Site is not known, however
based on the configuration of the limited fuel hydrocarbon impact to groundwater, the flow
. direction is estimated as southerly;
· Pumping from nearby water wells, specifically CWS 158-01, and recharge from the Stine
Canal could influence groundwater flow beneath the Site;
· Principal fuel hydrocarbon impact to soils is in the Source Area, the former UST cluster;
· Groundwater beneath the Site has been minimally impacted, based on reported low
concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater samples;
· MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume and MW-3
is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume;
· Due to the low concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it
may not be necessary to conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing
downgradient wells are located at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume and
the remediation system has been brought on line;
E2C Remediation
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 18,12BK03
Mav 27. 2004
· The site remediation system (VES) was brought on line on May 14, 2004. Over the initial
thirteen (13) days of operations the system operated for approximately seven (7) days
as an imbalance in the propane pressure system caused intermittent machine shutdown
(note: this problem has been repaired and the system is now operating continuously);
· MtBE has been reported in groundwater at low concentrations. A such, MtBE should be
added to the YES influenVeffluent sampling and analysis regimen to evaluate MtBE
removal trends;
· YES influenVeffluent samples should be collected and analyzed on a monthly basis to
assist in evaluation of fuel hydrocarbon removal rates and remedial trends; and
· A significant mass of fuel hydrocarbons (approximately 2,470 Ibs, or approximately 390
gallons of fuel) was removed from the subsurface during the short initial YES operational
period.
6.0 RECOMMENDA TIONS
Based on the data presented in this report and the above conclusions, E2C makes the following
recommendations:
· Have the Site surveyed to include monitoring well locations for latitude, longitude and
elevation;
· Continue groundwater monitoring and sampling on a quarterly basis;
· Analyze groundwater samples for BTEX and five fuel oxygenates using EPA Method
8260B and for TPHg using EPA Method 8015M;
· Analyze groundwater samples for 1,2-DCA and EDB for one (1) additional quarter. If
these compounds continue to be reported as non-detect, a recommendation will be made
to discontinue these analyses;
· Discontinue the analyses for lead and the supplemental groundwater parameters;
· Amend the YES influent sampling and analysis regiment to include MtBE (analyses for
TPHg, BTEX and MtBE) and monthly collection and analysis of samples;
· During the initial 'debugging' operational period for the YES, collect influenVeffluent
samples to verify that the equipment will meet SJV APCD PTU conditions;
· Continue to operate the YES with weekly maintenance visits and after approximately 30
days conduct the SJV APCD Startup Inspection with influenVeffluent compliance sampling
and Startup Inspection Test reporting; and
· If fuel hydrocarbon compounds increase in concentration and persist in groundwater at
MW-3 and/or MW-1, this data will be evaluated and, if warranted, a Workplan for
Additional Downgradient Groundwater Characterization with installation of additional
well(s) may be submitted at a later date.
E2C Remediation
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
7.0
LIMITA TlONS AND REPORT CERTlFICA TION
E2C performed this investigation in accordance with the generally accepted standards of care
existing in California at this time. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic
conditions is a difficult and inexact science. Judgments leading to conclusions and
recommendations are generally made with limited knowledge of subsurface conditions present.
No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
a).
This report has been prepared by E2C under the professional supervision of the registered
professional whose seal and signature appear herein. The conclusions of this report are based
solely on the Scope of Services outlined and the sources of information referenced in this report.
Any additional information that becomes available concerning the Site should be submitted to E2C
so that our conclusions may be reviewed and modified, if necessary. This report was prepared '"
for the sole use of Mr. Frank Hobin and/or agent(s), the RWQCB, and the Bakersfiel ~~ED G/:.-:--,
Department. &':J G I') ,~<", .
. ~ .~~? l.'f{ ~ \. ..... '.
t'C ~" '~", " "'. \
c62' we By: 1j?~' \
, ' *
.,'.. ~- ., N. o. 4779 ~:
tL OF CAL\fO~
Philip alwin, R.G. #4
Principal Hydrogeologist
Reg. Exp 11/30/04
Prepared By:
William A. Lawson,
Senior Geologist
EzC Remediation
9
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Project Number 1812BK03
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Mav 27 2004
FIGURES
Site Location Map
Site Plan
Second Quarter 2004 Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater MtBE Distribution Plot
. EpRemediation
Figures
.\
;\ -. rn-Sunsi:t A. '(~'r"")~''- .
t. .;:..------...-. ..(."). .
~l ü5 ç¡'e:~t",r Ln _.
.t·
1 0:) .."
of. ;z' àJ . ~', _=:5=
.,:': ~q]~1, - (D:' ~""þ_. '. p
...... . .i!) ttl (1) I'", .J
;.... q. -;:.........::.:
;- OJ - :u
- ~ ~ ::.. :2nd ::;:t
- ~ .' . 1 st St
o úuail:llood o !<em ~f ~'., ,,: . ~O,:Þ:d~e Hwy ~. f?~_und"'?è Ln
, " ~ , 'ß! ~,:",~t~ : . -4' ,_ :':-"'~~''''(':1~@ ~~
:.~:¡j~, 'Z; ~.. '~~'I'~ ~'. ,'~_" ,::.Je~r:~Ge\ti;:~LW. 'U ~'H ....,..3'_,_,...
, if ,- Stockdale=;' ".~ .-t.~-: ':0 - .. ~. '.. :IJ 5 <. ..~~:.-
"'¿,-,' "CöUnti:L.,.::: ::;,~~.. 'if., ,':----.... Bell.::T.:r' ;. *fi':¡¡' :{'
~~Cl~3. SunClal~,,: "~~... - .,.' . ..., . ,., - , ' .
--mòhr~'7iJ.' º countr,y ~t1-' .' , ,'¡'....;)üd Ln; u·," æ .~,?, "'~'ì' ,_.r, ,~o;;
't1~~;~"'" . CI~J ~~, ~ '.
-'-II ~ ~~:.~' rla'IIï'J "''''I ,~")
:J Sund.:I!ë··':. , ..: ~:: '. '" ..... -, :. ...,
Ë!. 1<.:COUritl:ÿ~', -r.., yJ¡ OJ . \.:iI10:- Dr
iC:.:- ~ '!~jrClUb" ~ ..\ ':,l:.:~;~:.~.~,::~_~.'~{~ ~ ,,' CI.1I1is Dr
... T,'lir.g:A'.'C ~",~ ~.. .·~"1__'r~ ,.!, 17:¿;, (..',
::i':i 4,~ .: ~ . ~Phaffle Dr 0.... - ::J
I~ ..... " "(I) '-.
.... Ç '. ø- '"'''__''' ç .. ~
~~ '......, (,I') . --
~._ . ,r:::cs;;¡¡: ~:
Hahll-~ve· ~ âo '~' O;Jkwû':¡dDr ,. '·"'.Ur .
., :~":. ·':"*~~...,t~ . .,' ~"' .(1'0··········· Laë·,~,·~· St -
,--.-' "'. ....._ ~- ,".I ~
~I~n~~~~ .:~:~" ~':__::'~~,.:
,
.. \
'y\J1~~7 .~~\:. '.çÒo :r:
";$ :>.,:".c:
..2: \~~ . . I§-
. .(9 1 I.t·
':0.... :.;,.,
':Q.@ S"
.:'" ~~..
t· '.
ŒI ~:-I!~ Navigation ïtCrMlc¡ies ~':..:-::;~::L
I
I
I
."
I
..,
2-
ñ
<II
~
Co
I
.-
':':~'. j"
'~, ''''f;,j_' ....
....~ '..;,r
I
I
I
I
,-
I
-
'~I. .~" (;,r .
, C~·v...
I
.ç:
. -.: .
Q
Ç)
o
~,
õ'
..,
Q.
::0
Q.
I
.1.0km
'O.5'mi·
ŒI ::~J Yahoo! :nc' ... :"J-
I
I
I
I
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906'
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
-
t:..:.J1~""" ..~~.
..... ..... tjl
-..... -
~~e..
$-,/;'
'\...~~ ::"
'\;I~~ ~:
-::.:~:;~' .z;'-:"- ! "
11th St..- IJ)
.. .., £rth St :4
-;ii -.-:;:-' - 'JJ
~ ;~ . ':jj
(1) -- _.
..,
.\~
.~ ?'-
0"'<:1'
,.~'!.
"'.
IJ>
~ ~
~..
:S~e-Q;~"'~:: -.-
::
¿..
~'.
» ....
~
~;
. , -&-:---
1-:_ .'¡
.g -:. .;
..4.~"
a::
reatSt
.0>
J:
(/)
o Wible Cr..ñ;t#
2
ü; :-!:!1
.. .@¡a
,;,¡. =.
_ oJ
::"<11
'U1::O
-Q"
Pa·:;llðCO Rd
õ
",
.#1 .
Calcutt;) Dr .
'<3--
--O\'enoJa
,__ -::- Milo- A 'Ie- -..
-.-.--
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
SITE LOCATION MAP
(.')
-
t
N
I
FIGURE
1
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I ~;':
c:::'
f''''
('
I .:¡"
'.r'<
I
I
I
I
-
8 9 . r'--·"':·~-7:--·!
" ',....,...-...:..,. -...'
,__"___.~._____,,_..,_.,,"W~_~____~~_~.~,~'w.~.. ,-~-,",.",-- ::?Z..(&lZ¿?t" P)~-~·_·_---·---
%'¿
~i :¿:
~¡¿,
%; ¡.
%' "~
%; .?
'%1 ~j
%j¿
';:;,: ¡~
'r,,; .,,-,
,~\ " :¿
%i ',?: '-
%' :,,-,
%: ,¿,
,,%:¡ .¿
~(-'., ,,-
~. '¿
.~.,¿
~: ,¿
:::i'. .'~.
~: ,¿.
':::i¡ ,¿
:%': ¡~;
:¿) ,~
""~:?;: ':::::
.;..:, J,
~¡ 0 !
.~: r;-;y/ß ¡
.~ _""'."" :'/-"-y.6..,________'..,
,W&$
'Ø/N//./U~N1::-'
~. ¡:,
/. 'ié
:/ ~'
:% %
~%
~ ié
.~. ,- a
~ %'
:? ¡:
'/.' .~
';1, %
'!///////////X/;
~~'\ /.\ .~:
¡~ ¡q
: \ }
...'
',,,,.
,'U,\ ,'-\ ;0.
:0 ;0
\ '
,.' ."
, f"'-·
:0 " ~ ;ê
,
"
8-8 .
B-4 0
+
MW-2
\.-.",,~..~
"
o
VES-8
~
r:~~·'1 r:':-"~
! ~
¡ f
'~1,;
B-1 ø '
D- = = -'~'4 =,
VES-Ä )0(.,:
\
i '
Equipment Compound
MW-1
+
G B-5
08-2
,'"
~
:.~ ¡
VES-C
ø B-3
+ MW-3
,~r!:ë!:?!:;;-'2' !?¿-??:{?{-<;~~{??£?{ .({~?.t,/??~{.(,/~
~, ..- ,,,,%
r/ :=: '..~~,~ ¡'%'
;%; _. C', 7; ,%
%: ',:: "'i .-;:: :%:
% '. '.' " ' .,.,' r",'" .' ," ' " ' " :%
''?X;;;/,I/Ú;/7;¿;;X/Ú;))/Ù;Ù;j;jÚ;';:;Ù;;-;;/Ž
'".-." ..._.~"'. ,-.. ._-,. ._,~,,-~..,~,.. .
. v '._v .'~ ""_'.".
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere,Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234'
," .'^ .-.~..._-~-,,--......
·....~_"'...__~......v "".'_,".__.,_'~ v _.~.__..._"__~ __-.,
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
SITE PLAN
B·6
: i
LEGEND
+ Groundwater
Monitoring Well
~ Soil Vapor
Extraction Well
i@ 1997 Soil Boring
"'".'."::; "-,
~ 1997 Hand Auger
8-6 Boring
e> 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
, ,
'.1..
r-~
..-
"-1.,'
...
\
,
E:)
,
SCALE: 1;' = 40 feet
I I
FIGURE
2,
I
I
8-9 .. '-":-'-:-;-;--1
('.-,-'---.-....-..---..---==:::;- "Ú/////?////:'
I ¡ :"/.//,;~.>h~'~""'::¿'
~~//.7.i:ü/.7.i:.n?r-..__l ¡~i (~
:~. ':;::, \(€"\,~','., 'A.~ ; '%J 1/:
,~ ;.-: ''I. i~ : " ! :;;-::, .~
~' ''';' ,.:::::¡ '1
'~ .~, ..' ,~¡ /,
;~~, ',,,,,,, ,~~.~
:% ", ~ I.''',:'~ fa ~¡ ',<j.
.~' '~:' :%1 .:-;:
~;.-:, ::::::1 /,
.~;.-::%' ' ,~:
,~i?: !~; ~ :0 ~j;a
'1/...-///;//////2 ' :%j'~
, %,' -/
,. ?;' i~:
~,," " '1"
:~. }
:Z'! 'z'
'~i '"?
~, '~:
,~i '?
~i ~;
:~i I;:::
~j :~
~j ,~
r;;/" ;~. ,
,%,~' ì
,~1 ,%:''''<-;0' !
~: j ,.:7ðá_.__..,_,;
'%:' ,',..,..,.
:7'/#&4
..
I ,
LEGEND
.- Groundwater
Monitoring Well
~ Soil Vapor
Extraction Well
<1\1 1997 Soil Boring
fJ" . ,,".
~ 1997 Hand Auger
Boring
B-6
ø 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
I
I
I
I
8-8
.
B-4 Ð
+
.,
_..'"
"
i'~
..
~
UJ
'-'
a
MW-2
1 ug/L MtSE
I
;s
I
.>
VES-8
I
¡
, í
~~J
¡"U
I>'
,:);1
[7~¡
, ,
+
16 ug/L MtSE
"'f\~
-.....
9z.~
O.~
~
(I)~
a
~~
-:)~
"i.
~
~
Ð B-2
C:.;
(:")
,-'
¡----¡
8-1 0:' :
, ,
, ¡
!
I
~;:
l;2
''cJ
VES-A )g{!" i
'.l:
I
cc
_..-_P
38t:
VES-C
\,1.;
. ,~.
...
I
I
M~i1
I
I
0f?'?.è??;;;?';?.¿:;;;/.R?,(~?.a~{;c.ä~ßt:<ä:?·'<?.??.?Z??..Vã
~ ~- ~
o 0~~ ~
~J ~~'~ ¡~
%' '.¡, ,1) i\ ..~
'&~"/lå:¿;'~"2~¿;yx.;ü;-;¿'fh;~-;///;Ü>;;å'Ü/Z2~Ø
,.k MW-3
Y 21 ug/L MtSE
\
,
Q B-S
I
6-6 (()
SCALE:
I
= 40 feet
I
I
I
.~~_ ,"_ .._.-.._.,_........_ _~_.._. "_~,, .~~_~__,_" '._____." .m___~ __. ._._._,__"'~_ . ._,.._.__~___~._w_ ..._.,~,_ _..__.,' ___.__~.__.'"'^ _"' __._~__,,_.~.~.~_~_,___¥___.,._.____......_AW._ .._,.~~_~.....
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 83.1-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831 ~6234
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
FIGURE
3
I
SECOND QUARTER 2004
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
-
I
I
.~"'_.,..~~_..__..._--
r-'··'~::~~;~~~'~~,·_·~···..J=:~~::i---7/áf??ZZ¿~~?~:-""1
/'////7//77/77/:"""'-" ..! ::1.', ',/' !
:~' --.... 'i'; ,\-,:\ \%J'¿ ¡
:Z ,% :,.C'i,',·,!e ,~j :?¿! i¿' ,
~.;-:. ,"" i ,I ,%,' _.~
:;! :%: \/ <) \/ ,%! :z:
% 'i'; ',' ..' "SI. ¡ '-'0 ~.F,~", '%' ,¿,
'%%: " .- :%ì I~
:%: (è:'% id / ~ 1(;%1 '/
.~ ,-,~, \ i ! ,'%" :~
;z' _J% \j , :%; .~ ;Z:
'% ¡:. " %' "'~:
%%' .,~ '.,'''''' %' ,~'
/: . .,., ,% · ~ . \J IV %.¡
.////////7//N?- ~¡,'" I~
~, V
~.' .~
';.(/l' ,..
%: ~.
,/:., :z.
~~.
%j ~~
:%1 "~
.~j '~
'%-1 .z'
:~¡ ~~:
';.'; 'Z
:~j '~
i/,C;¿J . ~
:%1.%
%"""'"'@'
·',..,_~T~-·"
,.~
I
I
--
I
B-8 .
,~
B-4
..
I
Cf)
....
c
I
,/
'--'-~"
I
VES-B
'--
~
!'l roo-
, '
~ , '
Ð B-2
in
,""
,.~,
8-1 ~-l
I
"
"71
VES-A ~i
",'j
3& VES-C
..~-- ¡
I
~
I
ø 8-3
I
MW-1
I
20
21 (dup)
MW-3
I
,. '?«:a~z~æ¿ze?<'??<?Ea~ ~
% -, ,-" ,.ž.
®;; ;:;-; 7,;( z;.Ú~~,),~'l.2:7:~;;;:('(':-)âÜå'(U-,_?~;-j;
I
I
8-6 Ð
,". .,....__..~'w'_.__.~ ,,__,_.., __.,_,__. __ ......__.....__"_._.~__'m_'_...__,..___.
__ .m_·__w...._·_,_~··__··· '__.___,.~_.____._._ '"
I
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California'
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite. 1 05
Bakersfield, California· 93313
TelephoAe: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
SECOND QUARTER'2004 GROUNDWATER
MtBE ISOCONCENTRATION PLOT
-
LEGEND
t Groundwater
Monitoring Well
~ Soil Vapor
Extraction Well
!;I, 1997 Soil Boring
§
C 1997 Hand Auger
Boring
8-6
Ð 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
r:<:;
c-
",
\
\'
SCALE: 1 = 40 feet
I I
FIGURE
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
ProiectNumber 18128K03.
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
TABLES
Mav 27 2004
Summary of Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring
Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Supplemental Groundwater Analytical Data
!
E2C Remediation
Tables .
I
- - --
Project Number 1812BK03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
May 27, 2004
-
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SECOND QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CARW ASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
ADril 23 2004
Well 10 Sample TOC Elevation Depth to Water GW Elevation B T E X TPHg TPHd MtBE TBA DIPE ETBE TAME 1,2-DCA I EDB
Date (feet MSL) (feet BTOC) (feet MSL) " uQ/L
MW-1 4/23/04 ...-....._-- 163.60 ------- nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 1 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O:9
MW-2 4/23/04 ------- 165.79 ------- nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 16 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 n~<0:5
. ._- "---"...
MW-3 4/23/04 ------.. 165.25 ..------ nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 20 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5
dup 4/23/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 21 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5
Notes:
1, ,2-DCA = 1,2,Dichloroethane
B = Benzene
BTOC = ,Below top of casing ¡
DIPE = Di·isopropyl Ether
dup' = duplicate sample
E = Ethylbenzene
EDB = Ethylene Dibromide (a.k.a. Dibromo Methane)
ETBE = Ethyl tertiary-butyl Ether
GW = Groundwater
MtBE = Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether
na = Not available
nd = Not detected at or above the Method Detection Limit, which is indicated by value.
T = Toluene
TAME = Tertiary-Amyl Methyl Ether
TBA = Tertiary-Butyl Ether (a.k.a tert-butanol)
TOC = Top of casing
TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
ug/kg = micrograms per liter
X = Total xylenes
* MW-4 on COC is a duplicate sample collected from well MW-1 for quality control.
E2C Remediation
Table 1-1
I
I I
I
I
II
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Project Number 1812BK03'
May 27, 2004
TÄ'BLE 2
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
Total DEPTH TOC GW ELEV A TION
WELL ID DATE Depth TOGW ELEVATION ELEVATION CHANGE
(feet BTOC) (feet BTOC) (feet MSL) (feet MSL) (feet)
4/2/03 180.00 162.30 SP
6/30/03 180.30 165.00 SP -2.70
MW-1 10/10/03 180.05 167.58 SP -2.58
1/22/04 165.00 SP 2.58
4/23/04 180.00 163.60 SP 1.40
.
10/10/03 178.00 169.72 SP
MW-2 1/22/04 167.41 SP 2.31
4/23/04 178.00 .. 165.79 SP 1.62
.
10/10/03 184.90 170.07 SP
MW-3 1/22/04 166.61 SP 3.46
4/23/04 184.90 165.25 SP 1.36
NOTES:
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
GW = Groundwater
MSL = Mean Sea Level
SP = Survey Pending
TOC = Top of Casing
E2C'Remediation
Table 2-1
I
Project Number 1812BK03.
May 27, 2004
I
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CARWASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield. California
Well 10 Sample B T E I X I TPHg TPHd MtBE TBA DIPE ETBE TAME 1,2-oCA EoB PCE Lead
Date µg/L
4/2/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 102 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
6/30/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 64 8 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 ' nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 nd<50 8 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
MW-1 10/10/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
1/22/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 2 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na
4/23/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 1 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na
10/10/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 60 ns 20 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
MW-2 1/22/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 6 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 1.5 nd<50
4/23/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 16 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na
10/10/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 80 ns 150 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
1/22/04 nd<0.5 nd<O.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 14 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O.5 na 1.6
MW-3 duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 14 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na 2
4/23/04 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<50 .. ns 20 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na
duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 21 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O,5 nd<0.5 nd<O.5 nd<0.5 na
, .
Notes:
Results in micrograms per liter (µg/I) = parts per billion (ppb)
Analytical Methods: BTEX, oxygenates, 1,2-DCA, EDB & VOCs by EPA Method 8260b; TPHg by EPA Method 8015M; dissolved lead by EPA 6010B
Method Detection Umits: BTEX· 0.5 µg/L; TPHg - 50 µg/L; MtBE, ETBE, TAME, and DIPE - 0.5 µg/L; TBA - 2.5 µg/L
1,2-DCA = 1 ,2·Dichloroethane
B = Benzene
DIPE = Di·isopropyl Ether
Dis. Lead = Dissolved lead
E = Ethylbenzene
EDB = Ethylene dibromide
ETBE = Ethyl tertiary-butyl Ether
MtBE = Methyl tertiary-butyl ether
na = Not analyzed
nd = Not Detected at or above Method Detection Limit, indicated by value
ns = Not Sampled
PCE = Tetrachloroethylene (a.k.a. perchloroethene)
T = Toluene
TAME = Tertiary Amyl methyl Ether
TBA = Tertiary Butyl Alcohol (a.k.a. tert-butanol)
TPHd - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel fuel
TPHg - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
X = Total xvlenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E2C Remediation
Table 3-1
I
- - --
Pr~ectNumber1812BK03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
May 27, 2004
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF VES MONITORING DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
Cumulative Cumulative Inlet Catalytic Well Well Well Well Well Dilution Field Field Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative
Date Calendar Operating Operating Flow % Combustior Outlet VES-C VES,BS VES-BD VES-AS VES-AD Air Valve TPHin TPH out Lbs./Hr. Lbs. Lbs. Gallons
LEL
Monitored Days Hours Hours (scfm) Temp. of Temp. OF valve valve valve valve valve (%) (ppmv) (ppmv) Extracted Extracted Destroyed Extracted
5/14/04 0 0 0 252 0.2 1451 1447 0 0 C 0 C auto 7,280 0 24.94 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/17104 3 43.0 43.0 252 0.2 1451 1447 0 0 C 0 C auto 7000 0 23.98 1031.3 1031.3 161.1
,., .' -,
5/18/04 4 59.0 59,0 253 0.4 1500 14B9 0 0 C 0 C auto 4000 0 13.76 1251.5 1251.5 195.5
..
5/24/04 10 118.0 118.0 250 0.6 1484 1468 0 0 C 0 C auto 3225 0 10.96 1898.3 1898.3 296.6
5/26/04 12 160.0 160.0 250 0.5 1448 1436 0 0 C 0 C auto 2450 0 8.33 2248.1 2248.1 351.3
-
5/27/04 13 170.0 170.0 248 0.5 1453 1441 0 0 C 0 C auto 2750 0 9.27 2340.8 2340.8 365.8
Notes:
% LEL estimated based on differences in oxidizer and stack temperature - 1 % LEL = approximately 25° F temperature difference ,
Hydrocarbons Removed (Ibs/month) = Influent Concentration (ppmv) X 10,6 X Influent Flow Rate (scfm) X 1Ib·mole/379.5 ft3 X 86 (Ib/lb-mole) X 1440 (min/day) X Run Time (days/month)
5/14/04 . Started system
open = 0; partially open = PO; closed = C
-
E2C Remediation
Table 4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number 1597BK03'
May 27, 2004
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF HYDROCARBON MASS REMOVED USING VES
(based on influent concentrations)
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
Date HC Removed Cumulative HC Influent Flow Rate Actual Run Time Daily Removal
Removed Concentrations Rate
(month/year) (Ibs/month) (Ibs) (ppmv) (scfm) (days) (Ibs/day)
I May-04 I 2587 I 2587 I 4451 I 251 I 7 I 364.3 I
Where: Hydrocarbons Removed (Ibs/month) = Influent Concentration (ppmv) X 10-6 X Influent Flow Rate (scfm)
X 1/b-mole/379.5 ft3 X 86 (Ib/lb-mole) X 1440 (min/day) X Run Time (days/month)
E2C Remediation
Table 5-1
I
- - --
Pr~eètNumber1812BK03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
May 26, 2004
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENTAL GROUNDWATER ANALYSES
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Date Alkalinity JBicarbona::J: carbonate:!. J HYdrOXide::!: Nitrate k Solids :I. .I. J Hardness
.................... ........................ ........................ ....................... Chloride ........................ .......................... ....................... Sulfate TKN ....................... Conductivity pH
WELL ID ....~.~.~~?~~... ..J~.~,~.?~~.... ..J~~~?~~... ...................... ....~~~,~.?~~;... .~~~..~~~~~~~.~~ ....J!.O'~L... ..................... .................... ...~~:~~?~~...
.................... ........................... ....................
(mg/L) (uMHOS/cm) (pH units)
4/2/03 170 170 nd<10 23 nd<10 22 350 48 0.8 184 530 7.0
.,
7/31/03 180 180 nd<10 22 nd<10 4 370 42 2.6 364 500 7.9
MW·1
1/22/04 96 96 nd<10 11 nd<10 0.7 270 89 0.3 129 440 6.5
1/22/04 200 200 nd<10 17 nd<10 2.1 260 23 0.3 269 460 7.3
MW-2 ¡
1/22/04 160 160 nd<10 9 nd<10 1.2 200 13 0.3 114 370 7.5
MW-3
I I
METALS ANALYSES
WELL ID Date .....~,~.~~~.~~,.,.I....,~~.I?p..~~., .,.I.......,~~~.~.......l~~.~~.~~~~.~ .~~.~~.~~.~,~~.I.. ,~?!~.~~~~.~...I.....~~,~~~.~,...l......~~~~.....
....................
Total in mg/L
4/2/03 54.9 nd<0.010 8.2 11.3 0.01 7.26 45.8 0.067
.~ . .
MW·1 7/31/03 77.3 0.078 156 41.5 3.51 27.1 44.2 0.551
-. -.-.
1/22/04 39.3 nd<0.010 2.4 8.0 0.05 4.22 37.8 nd<20
MW·2 1/22/04 61.3 0.068 111 28.3 3.02 17.8 45.0 0.383
MW-3 1/22/04 34,5 nd<0.010 0.836 6.7 0.02 3.07 35.6 nd<20
.---
I I
Notes:
< - Not Detected at or above method detection limit, which is indicated by value
CaC03 = as Calcium Carbonate
mglL = Milligrams per liter, equivalent to parts per million (ppm)
TDS = Total Dissolved solids
TKN = Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
E2C Remediation
Table 4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Appendix A
Appendix S
Appendix C
Appendix D
Mav 27. 2004
APPENDICES
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Laboratory
Report and Chain-of-Custody
Second Quarter 2004 Purge Water Manifest
AS 2886 Electronic Delivery Upload Confirmation Reports
, E2C Remediation
Appendices
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Proiect Number 1812BK03' Mav 27. 2004
APPENDIX A
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
E2C"Remediation Appendix A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
E2C: Remed¡,ati,Qn;. Water Quality Sampling Record
Groundwater Scientists : Environmental Consultants
ßOO Woodmere Drive, Suite 105; Bakersfield, California 933 and Well Development Data
Telephone: (661) 831-6906 / Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
SAMPLE ID I WELL #: tî \,./- i DEPTH TO WATER: ¡fo3,(P(j
E2C REM. PROJECT #: TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL: t~O.-OO
PROJECT NAME: WI A6A/1,4 C.V WELL DIAMETER; 4"
DATE SAMPLED: 01..{/23/04 CASING VOLUME: 10.)0
SAMPLED BY: ev / J'\) PURGE METHOD: ~A '/ /J)
,
PURGE CHARACTERISTICS TEMP pH SEC REMARKS
llME INTAKE RATE CUM. VOL WELL VOL (Fo) (UNITS) (mmhos/cm) (COLOR, TURBIDITY, ETC.)
DEPTH (GPM) (GAll RJMÆD
t\:30 1t?5/ t " q-~,~ r.;}.S D,~ 1 c:.leßI,C I ¡t;~) (~D{'
n
l/~~~ \f rJ,¡ ~.~tt D.LlI ¿..\ea.C / ;.10 6&0('
H5~ a~ 9-1.1 :} ILf Olï.f~ \\ I(
IgÐ5' ~~ 1(),\p -:t..OLf O.Lt.3 \l 1/
lJlV ~"",",vv1¡pI~
,
Well Capacity: 2' - 0.1632 gallon/linear foot
4" - 0.6528 gallon/linear foot
6" - 1.4688 gallon/linear foot
SAMPLED A J b" ~ ~ FT. FINAL DEPTH TO WATER: j ':3. 0 a. FT. 3 CASING VOLUMES = 32, [ \ GALS.
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................."............................................."...............
NOTES:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
-
I E2C Remediation
¡ Groundwater Scientists : Environmental Consultanls
pOO Woodmere Drive. Suite 105; Bakersfield, Ca!ifornia 933
I Telephone: (661) 831-6906 / Facsimile: (661) 831-6234 I
Water Quality Sampling Record
and Well Development Data
,
ISA,\IPLE ID I WELL It:
I E¡C REI.t PROJECT iI:
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
,
I
DEPTH TO WATER: I bs· I 'f
TOTAL DEPTH OF 'NELL: 11 g. 00
WELL DIM.1ETER; Lt ~
CASING VOLU/.IE: f . <t l
PURGE METHOD: J A IC,ç (J
JV\ \,J - 2-
PROJECT NA/.IE: WI Ah'(-}Of! C 'W
DATE SAMPLED: 0 Lt /2)(O~
SAMPLED BY: j( V / J \)
.)
PURGE CHARACTERISTICS
E'.I?
(~c)
pH
(UNITS)
REMA;::¡<5
(COLOR. TURS:J,TY, SiC;
Ti.I,IE
RAT:
GPM\
W:LL VOL
Fl.:MÆQ
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
tOo oJð\
I)
I
L
I
I
I
,
¡t~L>1
W¡¡:I Ca.:Jacitï· 2'· 0.1532 gallon/lini!ar loot
4'· O.Ô523 gallonilin¡¡ar foot
ô·· 1 Aôa3 gallon/lini!ar foot
5,.\,'.1;:>'-:0"\ \!o 6: ð I
23· 9
:;.:.;..5.
Fi, FIN,.\L O:,:>TH TO ','iA T:F1 I (p'). "13
Fr.
3 C""'S:I'~G V8LU.'.IES =
I\OTES:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I E2C Remediation
I
, Ground,'later Scientists : Environmental Consultants
pOO Woodmere Drive. Suite 105: Bakersfield. California 933
I Telephone: (ôô 1) 831·690ô / Facsimile: (ôô 1) 831-6234,
Water Quality Sampling Record
and Well Development Data
:SAI.IPlE 10 I WEll II:
I
I E:C REI.I. PROJECT iI:
i
PROJECT NAME:
I OA TE SAMPLED:
I
i SAI.IPLED BY:
I
~"w- 3
. \
:-
DEPTH TO WATER:
Ib5~2S-
IX ~_. 'TO
'-t' "....
17.82-
ß A ¡ Lv2
TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL:
f\Il A61)QA CvJ
OLf /z3/0 Y
,
Qv,l 1 D
WELL DIAMETER;
CASING VOLUME:
PURGE METHOD:
TiI.:E
PURGE CHARACTERISTICS
INTAKE I RATE CUM. VOL ,-WELL VOL
OEPTri (GP'-I) (GAL) FI..NÆD
FS\I.1.:::K5
(COLOA. TURS:QITY. ETC.;
r:.'.IP
(Fc)
i
C!){
/1
/1
II
Well Ca;:>acitï: 2'· 0 1 ò32 gallon/linear foot
~. O.õ525 gallon/linear foot
ô" - 1.4ôa3 gallon/linear foot
S;':,IPL.:w A
i~f,. yo
"'8
,')
:;..1:..3
FT. FINAL OEPTH TO '.'I,:" T"R J &,5, "3> ")
FT.
3 CAS:.';'::; \¡GLU~.IES =
Ì';QTES: fI\¡)"":Y ~..., OrAl k;11 ¿,Jì-) (êi¿ /3S-s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ProiectNumber 18.12BK03 Mav 27. 2004
.
"
APPENDIX B
Second Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Report
E2C Remediation Appendix B
I
r
_IC_l 1__01-"11"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_~III~l~U_VI_
-
- ..._~- -.....----.----.
Cliçnt Name E2C Remediation, LLC 661.031.6906 fax 661.031.623/\ Analysis Requested Sample Malrjx
Rrojcq NJmc: IV 1~f\1 / c..ì.f"t-..."'0t 'S :(1 :0
¡;. n n 0 AqLJCOlJS
Client Address: 5~~oodmcrc Drive, Suite 105, ßé)kersrield, ft) n
('. N If,
CA 93313 n co U) c·.
n D If) ß <1: .J: :õ ~
Q it> (', CL CL 2 !'! D
ßJJ L ð, ",.J S c11 f:1 '" ~ co 111 111 Soil
ProjcC\ M,am}ger: J 2 ~ ~ (', .,
(I) .' .( VI VI <0 U> n
« .( ': CL .' Q) <1: c: @
n. n. -ð ;¡; ~ IU IU n. ~!
Sampl.cr NéJme: ~"~C'" a.0'~ ,t\q¡>¡," (1 \)e_ jf' :¿ __ lIJ oJ, III c: c: lIJ N r. D Acidified
1I1 ~ no .' VI Q' .\1 ~ () !!?-
t? 0 ," ~ tn III
X III :;,- ;... 111 X
III II) :1: :r: :!~ )( I1J T> IIJ
0 0 no
I- I- n, n, () I- .' 1-
SJrnple DJte SJmplc Time S;1mplc Dcscíiplion ;1nd Conl<1iner Typc en I- I- > l{) I' ..J ru Comments
I .
~/~.~ /OLl O~X) '-í0 1 L~. 0 t-I I. X V\ IX IX 1(L(4~ÔD\
"v'('r" --- - - - - -
JJ\C' ("ÎW - J yc MI. X >< ~ 'X ùJL--
vc,rt') -:¡
JJ50 jV1l,J ,- ().. ,x. X X Cb~
-- - - - :- )Z - -
1\ 1 -J)C) 0 fY\ LrI .- ~ X >< X ..... .£. CXJ-p
(-- () '\J.I L y .'/- X /'
135'3 ~¡j-Y .. OlP
- - - - -
- - - - ,- - - - -I
- - - - - - - 1- -
.- - - - - - - - -
- ,- - - - - - - ,.-
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - ,- - -
,-- ,- ----
¡
" ¡
\ Turnaround Time Req~-;;'t~d~
.----------...---..-.......-.....--
----...
24 I-lour
48 I-lour
5-Day
Standard L
....--....-.,-...-..--..---
/"
Received By: ./
Relinquished By: ./
Date:
D<Jte:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Ha,lcyon Laboratories, Inc.
Laboratory Report
Certification # 1920
CLIENT: E2C Remediation
5YOO \,Vl)vdme:n:: Ave: Suite: 10:5
Bakcrstidd CA 9yy lY
Proje.;t Nam<::
Matrix:
Sampl<:d by:
TESTS: TPH G;:¡s hy EPA 80I5M
TPH g Anal~'si~:
Date: üfRe:port:
Units: ug/1
7 !-1--1--00! 7lH-002 71-1--1--003 71-1--1--00-1- 7[-1--1--005
-1-/23/2004 4/2y/200-1- 4/23/2004 -1-/23/2004 -1-/23/200-1-
Tr~\'<:¡ Blank ~!\\'·I ~[W·2 ~ [\\'-3 ~!W.~
TPH Gasoline ND ND ND ND ND
92
98
87
91
9-1-
TPH Gasoline
Surrogate Recovery °/0
Dt. = Dete:<:ti(m Limit
ND - Non-Dete.;t at gi\'e!1 DL
Ni-\ - Result !1l)t available
Hohin i\iagra
AC.J
Jason Da\'Ìs & Ramon Vakl.
-I,'yOi21J1).j.
512/2(1(1-1
~,
DL ug/I
51)
DL ugll
:5(H')
D Lug/I
12.51.11)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EP A 8260B Laboratory Report
Certification # 1920
CLIENT:
Water Sample Results in ug/L
E2C Remediation
5300 \Voodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Project ID :
Analysis Date:
Report Date :
Sample ID :
Shaver lake
4/25/2004
5/11/2004
7144-01 Travel Blank
Analyte
5 Oxygenates
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert~Butyl Alcohol
Methyl Tert-Buty\ Ether (MTBE)
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE)
Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)
BTEX Components
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
m & p Xylenes
o Xylenes
Lead Scavengers
1,2 Dichloro ethane (1,2 DCA)
1,2 Dibromo ethane (EDB)
Internal Standards
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1.4-Dictilorobenzene-d4
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro-
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
.. Result
Method RL
Units
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
., -
-,)
0.5
0.5
0,5
0.5
ugIL
ugIL
ugIL
ug/L
ug/L
ND 0.5 ugIL
ND 0.5 ugIL
ND 0,5 ugIL
ND 0.5 ugIL
ND 0,5 ugIL
ND 0,5 ugIL
ND 0,5 ugIL
Results % Recovery
50.0 100%
50.0 100%
50.0 100%
57.8
44.5
50.5
56.0
116%
89%
101%
112%
I
I H'alcyon Laboratöri:es, Inc.
EPA 82608 Laboratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
I
Certification # 1920
I CLIENT: E2C Remediation
5300 '\Voodmere Drive, Suite 105
I Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project 10 : Shaver Lake
Analysis Date: 4/25/2004
Report Date: 5/11/2004
I Sample ID : 7144-02 M\V-1
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
I 5 Oxygenates
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol NO 2.5 ugIL
I Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1 lU ugIL
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.5 ug/L
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0.5 ug/L
BTEX Components
I, Benzene NO 0.5 uglL
Toluene ND 0,5 ugIL
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/L
I ,m & p Xylenes ND 0.5 ugIL
o Xylenes ND 0.5 ugfL
i I Lead Scavengers
1,2 Dichloro ethane (1,2 DCA) NO 0.5 ug/L
1,2 Dibromo ethane (EDB) ND 0.5 ugIL
1
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
I Benzene, fluoro 50.0 100%
Benzene-d5, chloro- 50.0 100%
I 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100%
Surrogate Standards
I Methane, dibromofluoro- 58.2 116%
1.2-Qichloroethane-d4 45.0 90%
Toluene-d8 50,6 101%
I p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 67.9 136%
.
I
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 Laboratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
Certification # 1920
I CLIENT: E2C Remediation
I 5300 \Voodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project ID : Shaver Lake
Analysis Date: 4/25/2004
I Report Date : 5/11/2004
Sample ID : 7144-031.\'1\\'-2
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
I 5 Oxygenates
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol ND 2.5 ugfL
I Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 16 0,5 ugIL
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0,5 ug/l
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND 0.5 ug/l
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0,5 ug/l
BTEX' Components
I Benzene ND 0.5 lIg/l
Toluene \''D 0,5 lIg/l
I Ethylbenzene [\¡'D 0,5 lIgll
m & p Xylenes ND 0,5 lIg/l
o Xylenes ND 0.5 lIg/L
I Lead Scavengers
1,2 Dichloro ethane (1.2 DCA) ND 0.5 u g/l.
1,2 Dibromo ethane (EDB) ND 0.5 ug.n.
I
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
I Benzene, fluoro 50.0 100%
Benzene-d5, chloro- 50.0 100%
I 1 .4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100%
Surrogate Standards
I Meth'8ne, dibromofluoro- 57.9 116%
1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 44.2 88%
I Toluene-d8 50.3 101%
p"Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 67.7 135%
-
I
I Halcyon Laboratories., Inc.
I EPA 82608 Laboratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
Certification # 1920
I CU£NT: £2C Remediation
I 5300 \Voodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project [0 : Shaver Lake
Analysis Date: 4/25/2004
I Report Date : 5/11/2004
Sample ID : 7144-04 L\HV-3
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
I 5 Oxygenates
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol NO ') - llgIL
_.J
I Methyl Tert-Buty\ Ether (MTBE) 20 0.5 ug/L
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) NO 0.5 llgIL
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.5 ugIL
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0,5 llgIL
BTEX Components
I Benzene NO 0.5 II glL
Toluene NO 0,) ug!L
I Ethylbenzene NO 0,5 llgIL
m & p Xylenes [\11) 0.5 llgIL
o Xylenes ~1) 0.5 ugJL
I Lead Scavengers
1,2 DichIara ethane (1,2 DCA) ~,rD 0,5 ugIL
1.2 Dibromo ethane (EDB) ND 0.5 llgIL
I
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
I Benzene, fluoro 50.0 100%
Benzene-d5, chloro- 50.0 100%
I 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100%
Surrogate Standards
I Methane. dibromofluoro~ 57.5 115%
1 .2~Dichloroethane-d4 49.8 100%
I Toluene-d8 51.4 103%
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 62,3 125%
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EP A 82608 Laboratory Report
Water Sample Results in ug/L
Certification # 1920
CLIENT:
E2C Remediation
5300 \Voodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Project ID :
Analysis Date:
Report Date :
Sample ID :
Hobin Niagra
4/25/2004
5/11/2004
7144-05 lVI\V-4
Analyte
Method RL
Units
.. Result
5 Oxygenates
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE)
Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
ND
21
ND
ND
ND
2.5
0.5
0.5
0,5
0.5
BTEX Components
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
m & p Xylenes
o Xylenes
ND 0,5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
ND 0.5 ug/L
Results % Recovery
50.0 100%
50.0 100%
50.0 100%
Lead Scavengers
1,2 Dichloro ethane (1,2 DCA)
1,2 Dibromo ethane (EDB)
Internal Standards
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluQro-
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
57.5
44.2
50.6
62.7
115%
88%
101%
125%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
l
:~:~:
Halcy.on Laboratories, Inc.
EPA 8260B QA-QC Report
EP A 8015M QA-QC Report
Certification # 1920
''''':,::.
..
-~;.:<.:...
1~
CLIENT:
E~C Remediation
5300 Woodmerc DrÍ\e, Suite 105
Bakcrstic1d, CA 93313
Projçcts Covered by this QA-QC: Niagra Car Wash
Analvsis Date: -t/H/2UU-t
1\.btri:x: AQ
BF'B:
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
Benzene, tluoro 50.0 100%
Benzene·d5, chloro- 50.0 100%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100%
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromotluoro- 56,8 114%
l,2-Dìchloroethane·d4 42,8 86%
Ta\uene,d8 48,1 96%
p·Bromotluorobenzene (BFB) 62,3 125%
IB:
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
Benzene, tluoro 50.0 100%
Benzene-d5, chiaro- 50.0 100%
1,4-0ichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100%
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro- 51.7 103%
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 54.0 108%
Toluene·d8 49,1 98%
p·Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 49.6 99%
MS: Results % Recovery
1,1-Dichloroethene 41.6 83%
Trichloroethene 45.2 90%
Chlorobenzene 46.4 93%
Toluene 54.6 109%
Benzene 64.4 129%
p-Bromotluorobenzene (BFB) 57.7 115%
MSD: Results % Recovery
1 ,1·DiChloroethene 40.8 82%
Trichloroethene 462 92%
Chlorobenzene 46.4 93%
T ol'Jer.e 55.0 110%
Benzene 62.4 125%
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 57.5 115%
8015M-TPHG
% Recovery
BFB 88%
'IÔ 88%
1\IS. 10-4%
i\ISO 118%
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PraieetNumber 1812BK03
Mav 27. 2004
APPENDIX C
Second Quarter 2004 Purge Water Manifest
E2C Remediation
Appendix C '
NON~HAZARDOUS·
WASTE MANIFESt
1. Generator's us EPA ID No.
Generator's Nome and Moiling Address
Generator's Pt10ne
IV, f,~IÎril1 L. V
t?:ì
;') ,.,- Cl ~I)
6. US EPA ID Number
......It.L 0 ·0· 0).
8. US EPA ID Number
/(q./
t
5. Transporter 1 Company Nome
\i..v"", (ì...;,,....¿,\'Jt1: Of\¡'
7. Transporter 2 Company Name
9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address
Q.ij GA~Ul)r\ ,; I ncA
r·o·.... V
Î C) 0 ,5:; I.. "-'
11. Waste Shipping Name and Description
10. US EPA ID Number
C. Facility's Pt10ne
q3 30'~
A ·L· .0.0.2 .¿ 0 ~?/1./;
Ct~ ¡ \ 6'1) ~ ly))
No. Type
13.
Total
Quanti
12. Containers
a.
r;¡J
,I -,)'"
'r-" (../c
ð.p . I l-í
.\ 0 0 6""
G b.
Additional Descriptions for Materials listed Above
No I\.J - Hit 2..¥1;-rZÓð v-s. f..J R..f:.E, '0 4--~JL_
VQDrt Lt. ~ Ð",;> - t.ze -D(3 --OÞJ~
E. Handling Codes for Wastes listed Above
(Jr'.'
I<"'-U)
Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
WI~(L 'P P €-
tZr\ft U-b ~~ '1 c..O--~c...~ to tc \ -- S" ð'i -0 ç %'5"
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described aboye an this manifest are not subject to lederal regulations lor reporting proper disposal 01 Hazardous Waste.
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
~
20. Facility Owner· or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19.
Printed/Typed Name
1C)
TRANSPORTER i¢1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
-
Praieet Number 1812BK03 Mav 27. 2004
APPENDIX D
AS 2886 Electronic Delivery Upload Confirmation Reports
£2C Remediation Appendix D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Uploading EDF File, Step 3
Page 1 of 1
AB2886 Electronic Delivery
tvIain Menu I Vie\V/Addfacilities I Uploa,d EDD I (heck EDD
Your EDF file has been succcessfully uploaded!
Connrmation Number: 2714674532
Date/Time of Submittal: 4/5/2004 1:02:52 PM
Facility GloballD: T0602993719
Facility Name: CARW ASH OF AMERICA
Submittal Title: 2Q 03 \V NIAGARA
Submittal Type: G\V Monitoring Report
1.ogged in as E2C REMEDIATION, LLC
(AUTH_RP)
CONTACT SITE AD.I\.!lr-IISTR/.\,TOR,
https:!íesi.swrcb.ca.govíab2886/upload_edC4.asp ?temp jolder=61827 6E2C%5 FREMED!... 4/5/2004
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UploadinKEDF File, Step 3
~-:---~-_-.d::"~~,,: ~~..œ:!:I~~~....ma:r.:.~~~~H
~ ß1B2'886 Electronic Deliyery i
M.iRM,"" I Y;"Y/A,ðH,ç@¡.. I )JplpMJ,I'R I Çh,çj{!òDP ~ ~
z ____
uYour ~DF file has be~n succcess~ully upJoaded! II
Conf~rmatiOn Number: 6,~Q5321316 . ~
Date/Time of Submittal: 4/6/2004 11:18:33 A1VI I
FacHHy Global ID: T0602993719 i
Facil!ty Na:ne: CAR~ ASH OF MI1ERICA , f
SubmIttal Title: 3Q 0.:> v.¡ NIAGA...~A CAR 'W ASH i
Submittal Type: GW Monitoring Report ~
=.J
Logged in as E2C REMEDIATION, LLC
(AUTI-CRP)
CONT ACf SITE APMIN!SIMI.QR.
httnc'!!"''''' cmrrn r~ 0'(whh?RRh!lln1()~r1 pr1f 4 :'!<:.n?tp.."nn f()lrlp.r=="q""¿t9..H?r~¡:;P"D-¡:;ÌI¡f'P )T
Page 1 of 1
A It: '-'(')();\
Uploading EDF File, Step 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AB-28S'6Ele,ctronic' Delivery
I.YIªinMçnL1 Yj~w/AcjºfªçiJW~~ I J.]p1.ºªº,EPQ ¡ Çh~çkE:r:m
1
Your EDF file has been succcessfully uploaded!
Confirmation Number: 5180864870
Date/Time of Submitta~: 4/7/2004 4:42:01 PM
Facility Globa) ill: T0602993719
Facility Name:CA..T(WASH OF AMERICA I'
Submittal TiHe: 1 Q 04 W NIAGARA CAR WASH J
Submittal Type: GW Monitoring Report
Logged in as E2C REMEDIATION, LLC
(AUTH_RP)
CONTACT SITE ARMJN¡$T.RAI.OJ~,.
https://esi.swrcb.ca.gov/ab2886/upload_edC4.asp?temp _ folder=412777E2C%5FREMEDI...
Page 1 of 1
417/2004
I
Uploading EDF File, Step 3
I
r="'=~- /á ~,:~-:-~;::==-~==:=:~-~~"~'''==~=--~~-=-l
i .1.~ \b£¡,(:;Úv 1'2.J(ect¡rV3ûJJ.C l'JeHvery I
~ MajDJy1el1l,l I Yie\,[!lv:ldfªçilitie$ T.JpIQacJ:EPP! ÇþqC1<EPP ~
~-- . -,- ,~~ - ~------~~
, .
~ Your EDF fiie has been sDcccessfuìly uploaded! 'ti
~ ~
'i ~
ä Confirmation Number: 908031Oï61 ~
;1 ~
,I ~
~ Date/Time of Slibmittal: 4/7/20043:58:32 PI\,í ~
~ :FadHty GIob21 rD: T0602993719 ~
~ IìadHty Name: CAR'ìVASHOF AMEF1CA ~
¡ Suhmittal Title: 4Q 03 V'¡ l\TIAGARA CAR ¥! ASH ' t.;
~ Submittal Type: G'YV Monitoring Report, ~
. .'
L _'~~~""''''~-''----~''''''-V-M?'"""~~~
I
I
I
I
I
Lo,.;cd in as E2C REI....!EDIATION, LLC
(AUTH_ RP)
CONT Acr S lTE AP.J:--J!N.tsI&:\IQR.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
https://èsi.svvIcb.ca..gov/ab2886/upload edf 4.asp?temp folder=946424E2C%5FREMEDI...
Page 1 of 1
4/71200¿ ·
- - -
Uploading EDF File, Step 3
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AB2886 Electronic Delivery
Mªi.n,.M~mJ.IYi.~w.Ü\gqFªç@i.~§ I J)pIºªg,EP.P I Çh~çkEPR
Your EDFf11e has been succcessfully uploaded!
Confirmation Number: 9721187591
Date/Time of Submittal: 5/27/200411:44:14 AM
Facility Global ID: T0602993719
Facility Name: CARW ASH OF AMERICA
Submittal Title: 2Q 04 W NIAGRA CAR WASH
Submittal Type: GW Monitoring Report
Logged in as E2C REMEDIATION, LLC
(AUTH_RP)
CONT Acr SITE APMINlSIMT.QR.
https://esi.swrcb.ca.gov/ab2886/upload_edC4.asp ?temp jolder=123562E2C%5FREMEDI... 5/27/2004