HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION (5)
March 3, 2004
Mr. Frank Hobin
8908 Versailles Dr.
Bakersfield, CA 93311
SUBJECT: First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report and
Remediation Status Report
Former Niagara Car Wash
1700 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
Dear Mr. Hobin:
This report presents the First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Former Niagara
Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield, California. This work was
conducted in response to the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central
Valley Region (RRWQCB) letter dated August 26, 2003. In addition, this report documents the
remediation status for the Site.
It is a pleasure to be of service, should you have any questions regarding this submittal, do not
hesitate to call either of the undersigned at 661-831-6906.
Respectfully Submitted,
E2C Remediation
/ZtÂ
William A. Lawson, R.
Senior Geologist
cc:
. Mr. Howard H. Wines III, R.G.
Hazardous Materials Specialist
City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Environmental Engineering Consulting & Remediation, Inc. dba E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 1 05, Bakersfield, CA 93313 p: 661,831,6906 f: 661,831.6234
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIRST QUARTER 2004
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
AND
REMEDIATION STATUS REPORT
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 STINE ROAD
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
March 3, 2004
Project Number 1812BK01
Prepared For:
Mr. Frank Hobin
8908 Versailles Dr.
Bakersfield, CA 93311
Prepared By:
E2C Remediation
Environmental/Engineering Consultants
5300 Wood mere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3. 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE 0 F CO NTENTS ........................................................................... .................................. ..... i
LIST OF FIGURES......................... ..... .............................. ............................................................... i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................1
Summarý of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring .............................................................1
Summary of Remediation Status.............................................. ....................................................1
Conclusions ..................................................... .............................................................................1
Recommendations........................................................................................................................ .1
1.0 I NTRO DUCTION ........ ................................... ............................... .... ...................... ..............3
1.1 Site Description..................................................................................................................3
1.2 Site Hydrogeology........................................... .................... ..............................................3
1.3 Site History.................................. ......................................................................................3
2.0 FIRST QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ..............................................4
2.1 Groundwater Elevations........................ ............... .............................................................4
2.2 Groundwater Purging and Sampling .......,............................................ ................ ......... .....4
2.3 Groundwater Analyses................ .......... ......... ...................................................................4
2.4 Summary of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Data...........................................5
2.5 Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data................ ............ ..... .....................................5
3.0 REMEDIATION STATUS REPORT ............................ .............. ..........................................5
4.0 CO N C LU S ION S........... ......... ........................................ ......................................................6
5.0 R ECOM M EN DATI ONS ... .... ..................................... .......... ....................... ...... ............... .....6
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND REPORT CERTIFiCATION...................... ..........................................7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Site Location Map
Site Plan
First Quarter 2004 Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater MtBE lsoconcentration Plot
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 5
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Supplemental Groundwater Analyses Data
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
LIST OF APPENDICES
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Report
January 2004 Supplemental Groundwater Analytical Laboratory Report
Purged Water Disposal Manifest
E2C Remediation
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3. 2004
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E2C Remediation (E2C) has completed the First Quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event for
the Former Niagara Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield, California.
This document documents the monitoring activities. In addition, the Remediation Status Report for
the Site is presented.
Summary of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring
On January 27, 2004, groundwater was monitored and sampled at the Site. The groundwater
samples were chemically analyzed at a State of California-Certified analytical laboratory for the
fuel hydrocarbon constituents of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd), a full-scan of volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
which includes the volatile aromatic compounds of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes
(total) (BTEX), the five fuel oxygenates of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MtBE), tertiary-butyl
alcohol (TBA; a.k.a. tert-butanol), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE),
and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), the lead scavengers of 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and
1,2-dibromoethane (EDB; a.k.a. ethylene dibromide), and dissolved lead. Finally, groundwater
samples were also analyzed for inorganic parameters and metals.
Summary of Remediation Status
The SJV APCD permit has been issued for the Site and the Site remedial equipment has been
contracted for construction. In addition, a Request for Modification to the Permit To Operate will be
submitted to the SJVAPCD for their review on an expedited basis. The equipment should be
completed in late March 2004 with subsequent installation and startup followed by long-term full-
scale remediation.
Conclusions
Based on the site assessment work and groundwater monitoring data obtained at the Site to date,
E2C concludes the following:
· The groundwater flow direction and gradient beneath the Site is not known, however
based on the configuration of the limited fuel hydrocarbon impact to groundwater, the flow
direction is estimated as southerly;
· Pumping from nearby water wells, specifically' CWS 158-01, and recharge from the Stine
Canal could influence groundwater flow beneath the Site;
· Principal fuel hydrocarbon impact to soils is in the Source Area, the former UST cluster;
· Groundwater beneath the Site has been minimally impacted, based on low reported
detections of fuel hydrocarbon compounds in groundwater samples;
· MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume and MW-3
is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume;'and .
· Due to the low concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it
may not be necessary to conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing
downgradient wells are located at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume.
Recommendations
Based on the data presented in this report and the above conclusions, E2C makes the following
recommendations:
· Continue groundwater monitoring and sampling on a quarterly basis;
· Analyze groundwater samples for BTEX and five fuel oxygenates using EPA Method
8260B and for TPHg using EPA Method 8015M;
· Analyze groundwater samples for 1 ,2-DCA and EDB for two additional quarters. If these
compounds continue to be reported as non-detect, a recommendation will be made to
discontinue these analyses;
E2C Remediation
1
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3. 2004
a Discontinue the analysis for lead;
· Discontinue the supplemental groundwater analyses;
· Prepare and submit a Modification Request to the SJVAPCD for the existing Authority To
Construct. The request will include a propane-fueled generator to provide electricity for
the vapor extraction unit;
· Mobilize the remedial equipment when construction is completed, construct the equipment
compound enclosure, and implement full-scale remedial operations with weekly
maintenance visits; and
· If fuel hydrocarbon compounds increase in concentration and persist in groundwater at
MW-3 and/or MW-1, this data will be evaluated and, if warranted, a Workplan for
Additional Downgradient Groundwater Characterization with installation of additional
well(s) may be submitted.
EzG Remediation
2
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3. 2004
1.0 INTRODUCTION
E2C Remediation (E2C) has completed the First Quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring event for
the Former Niagara Car Wash facility (Site) located at 1700 Stine Road in Bakersfield, California.
This report documents the groundwater monitoring activities and the results. In addition, the
Remediation Status Report for the Site is presented. The work was performed in accordance with
the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region (RWQCB)
letter dated August 26, 2003.
1.1 Site Description
The Site is a currently operating car wash (Whitewater Car Wash) located in Bakersfield,
California, at 1700 Stine Road between Stine Road and Hasti Acres Drive (see Figure 1 for Site
Location Map). The Site encompasses approximately 1.7 acres and is located approximately
200 feet south of Ming Avenue. The Site is located in Section 11, Township 30 South, Range 27
East MDBM.
Three (3) 12,OOO-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) were located as shown on
Figure 2 (Site Plan). The USTs were removed in April 2003. The fuel dispensers under the
canopy area have also been removed along with the associated piping. One (1) 2,OOO-gallon
waste oil UST is still located at the Site as shown on Figure 2.
The surrounding area is a mixed commercial and residential area along Stine Road and Hasti Acres
Drive. The Stine Canal (irrigation and runoff) traverses the Site from northeast to southwest,
between the carwash building and Stine Road.
1.2 Site Hydrogeology
Regionally, the depth to groundwater had been estimated at approximately 190 feet bgs
according to the 1996 Water Supply Report published by the Kern County Water Agency.
During March 2003 drilling activities, first encountered groundwater was found at a depth of
approximately 163 feet bgs. In September 2003 groundwater was encountered at
approximately168 feet bgs.
The surrounding area well survey identified four (4) production wells within a 2,500-foot radius of
the Site. All of these wells were noted to be operating during a field reconnaissance.
The Stine Canal (irrigation and runoff) traverses the Site from northeast to southwest between
the carwash building and Stine Road. The canal continues beneath the Site as a concrete pipe
culvert which extends from north of Ming Avenue to the southern boundary of the Site. The canal
is an unlined channel to the south of the Site. Water was observed to be flowing in the canal
during a field reconnaissance.
1.3 Site History
A detailed Site History was discussed in the June 17, 2003 report, 'Site Characterization Report
of Findings, Report of Surrounding Area Well Survey, SVE System Installation and Pilot Test
Report of Findings & Work plan to Implement Remedial Action, Fonner Niagara Car Wash, 1701
Stine Road, Bakersfield, California' (IRAP).
In March 2003, E2C installed one (1) groundwater monitoring well to assess groundwater
conditions at the Site. In addition two (2) dual completion VE wells and one (1) single completion
VE well were installed. Finally, two (2) 40-foot soil borings were advanced on either side of the
dispenser islands. Upon completion of the well installations, trenches were excavated and the
wells were plumbed to a manifold by the equipment area. Upon completion of plumbing, the
trenches were backfilled and completed with concrete caps. This work was reported in the Site
Characterization Report of Findings dated June 17, 2003. Based on their review of this work, the
RWQCB requested additional groundwater characterization in a letter, dated August 26, 2003.
EzC Remediation
3
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3 2004
Groundwater monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 were installed during the week of September 28,
2003, after which the wells were developed. Initial groundwater monitoring/sampling was
conducted at the new wells in October 2003 and that data was reported in the Fourth Quarter
2003 Groundwater Monitoring Report.
2.0 FIRST QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
The following sections describe for the groundwater monitoring and sampling activities conducted
by E2C Remediation (E2C) on January 22, 2004, which represented the First Quarter 2004.
2.1 Groundwater Elevations
The initial task performed was checking the well for presence of free-product using a clear bailer.
Free-product was not present in any well. The depth of freestanding groundwater was then
measured to the nearest one-hundredth (0.01) of a foot using a Solinst water level indicator and
an attached measuring tape. The equipment was washed with Alconox soap and double rinsed
prior to each use.
Currently, a licensed surveyor is being contracted to survey the wells to comply with AB2866. It
is anticipated that surveying will be completed in the Second Quarter 2004. However, a
southerly groundwater flow direction can be interpreted (see Figure 3A) based on the
groundwater chemical data. First Quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring data are summarized in
Table 1A and are summarized with historical groundwater elevation data in Table 2.
2.2 Groundwater Purging and Sampling
Groundwater was purged at the monitoring well using a bailer. A minimum of 3 casing volumes
was removed from the well prior to sampling groundwater. A casing volume is calculated by
multiplying the height of the freestanding water column in the well by the cross-sectional area of
the well casing. The temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were measured
periodically to verify sufficient purging indicated by stable measurements on field instruments.
When the measurements were within 10% of each other, groundwater in the well was considered
stable for sampling (see Appendix A for groundwater purge data sheets).
Each sample was collected using a new disposable bailer. Liquid in the bailer was decanted into
two 40-milliliter volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials. Each VOA was sealed using a tight fitting
Teflon-lined screw cap. Care was taken so that no headspace or bubbles existed after sealing
each VOA with the lid. All samples were labeled and documented on a Chain-of-Custody record
immediately after sealing. The samples were placed into an iced cooler maintained at 4°
Centigrade for transport to the analytical laboratory. Note: The sample labeled MW-4 on the
Chain-of-Custody is a duplicate of the sample from MW-3.
2.3 Groundwater Analyses
Groundwater· samples were transported to and analyzed at Halcyon Laboratories (State
Certification #1920) in accordance with State guidelines and EPA protocols for Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) using EPA Method 8015M, volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) using EPA Method 8260b full-scan, which include the volatile aromatics of benzene,
toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), the five fuel oxygenates of methyl tertiary-
butyl ether (MtBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA; a.k.a. tert-butanol), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE),
ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary-amyl ether (TAME, and for the lead scavengers of
1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromomethane (EDB; a.k.a. ethylene dibromide) using
EPA Method 8260b. In addition, groundwater samples were analyzed at Columbia Analytical
Services (State Certification #1364) for the following analyses:
· General minerals, including nitrate;
· Physical parameters of hardness, pH, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS);
· Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN); and
· Total dissolved lead.
E2C Remediation
4
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ProiectNumber1812BK03
March 3. 2004
2.4 Summary of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Data
The current analytical are presented in tabular form in Table 1 and with historical analytical data in
Table 3. The analytical laboratory report for the First Quarter 2004 is included as Appendix B.
January 22, 2004 groundwater analytical data are summarized below:
· BTEX compounds were reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· TPHg was reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· MtBE was reported at each of the three (3) monitoring wells with the maximum
concentration (14 µg/L) reported at MW-3 (see Figure 4);
· TAME, TBA, DIPE, and ETBE were reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· 1 ,2-DCA and EDB were reported as non-detect at all three (3) wells;
· Tetrachloroethylene (a.k.a. perchloroethene) was reported at well MW-2 at a
concentration of 1.5 µg/L and at well MW-3 at a concentration of 1.6 µg/L (1.7 µg/L in
duplicate sample);
· All other VOCs were reported as non-detect at all wells; and
· General mineral, nitrate and TKN analyses revealed background levels for metals,
moderately low hardness, neutral pH, low to moderate TDS and minimal TKN (see Table
4).
2.5 Discussion of Groundwater Analytical Data
Based on the groundwater analytical data to date, groundwater beneath the Site has been
minimally impacted. MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater
plume and MW-3 is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume. Due to
the low concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it may not be
necessary to conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing downgradient wells
are located at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume.
3.0 REMEDIATION STA TUS REPORT
A SJV APCD Authority to Construct application has been prepared and submitted by E2C, and
approved by SJV APCD for the remediation equipment. PG&E was contacted to obtain an
estimate of costs and installation schedule to supply electrical power. Based on the PG&E cost
estimate (>$20,000) and the estimate for time to complete (approximately six months at a
minimum), E2C has explored other power supply options. Based on this research, E2C has
opted to purchase a propane generator-powered thermal oxidizer. In addition, a Request for
Modification to the Permit To Operate will be submitted to the SJVAPCD for their review on an
expedited basis.
In late November 2003 E2C was made aware of a new State Cleanup Fund (Fund) policy
regarding equipment purchase and leasing. This policy requires pre-approval of costs for
equipment purchase. E2C prepared and submitted the Request for Pre-Approval, which was
approved by the Fund in January 2004. E2C has contracted Baker Furnace to construct the
equipment. Equipment delivery is scheduled for late March 2004.
Upon mobilization of the equipment to the Site, an equipment compound enclosure will be
constructed followed by approximately 30 days of operation to allow the equipment to stabilize
(i.e., 'work out the bugs') and to verify that the equipment will meet SJVAPCD permit conditions.
The SJV APCD Startup Inspection will then be scheduled and conducted with subsequent
reporting. Full-scale long-term remedial operations will then proceed. The Site will be visited on a
weekly basis to maintain the equipment and record remedial system parameters. These
parameters will be used to calculate the efficiency of the equipment, the fuel hydrocarbon removal
rates, and the mass of fuel hydrocarbons removed.
E2C Remediation
5
·
,I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3, 2004
4.0
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the site assessment work and groundwater monitoring data obtained at the Site to date,
E2C concludes the following:
· The groundwater flow direction and gradient beneath the Site is not known, however
based on the configuration of the limited fuel hydrocarbon impact to groundwater, the flow
direction is estimated as southerly;
· Pumping from nearby water wells, specifically CWS 158-01, and recharge from the Stine
Canal could influence groundwater flow beneath the Site;
· Principal fuel hydrocarbon impact to soils is in the Source Area, the former UST cluster;
· Groundwater beneath the Site has been minimally impacted, based on low reported
detections of fuel hydrocarbon compounds in groundwater samples;
· MW-1 is located at/near the southwest leading edge of the groundwater plume and MW-3
is located near the southeast leading edge of the groundwater plume; and
· Due to the low concentrations of dissolved-phase fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater, it
may not be necessary to conduct additional groundwater characterization, as the existing
downgradient wells are located at/near the leading edges of the groundwater plume.
£0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the data presented in this report and the above conclusions, E2C makes the following
recommendations:
· Continue groundwater monitoring and sampling on a quarterly basis;
· Analyze groundwater samples for BTEX and five fuel oxygenates using EP A Method
8260B and for TPHg using EPA Method 8015M;
· Analyze groundwater samples for 1 ,2-DCA and EDB for two additional quarters. If these
compounds continue to be reported as non-detect, a recommendation will be made to
discontinue these analyses;
· Discontinue the analysis for lead;
· Discontinue the supplemental groundwater analyses;
· Prepare and submit a Modification Request to the SJVAPCD for the existing Authority To
Construct. The request will include a propane-fueled generator to provide electricity for
the vapor extraction unit;
· Mobilize the remedial equipment when construction is completed, construct the equipment
compound enclosure, and implement full-scale remedial operations with weekly
maintenance visits; and
· If fuel hydrocarbon compounds increase in concentration and persist in groundwater at
MW-3 and/or MW-1, this data will be evaluated and, if warranted, a Workplan for
Additional Downgradient Groundwater Characterization with installation of additional
well(s) may be submitted.
E2C Remediation
6
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
March 3. 2004
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND REPORT CERTIFICATION
E2C performed this investigation in accordance with the generally accepted standards of ære
existing in California at this time. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic
conditions is a difficult and inexact science. Judgments leading to conclusions and
recommendations are generally made with limited knowledge of subsurface conditions present.
No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
This report has been prepared by E2C under the professional supeNision of the registered
professional whose seal and signature appear herein. The conclusions of this report are based
solely on the Scope of SeNices outlined and the sources of information referenced in this report.
Any additional information that becomes available concerning the Site should be submitted to E2C
so that our conclusions may be reviewed and modified, if necessary. This report was prepared
for the sole use of Mr. Frank Hobin and/or agent(s), the RWaCB, and the Bakersfield Rre
Department.
Prepared By:
William A. Lawson,
Senior Geologist
E2C Remediation
7
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
March 3, 2004
FIGURES
Site Location Map
Site Plan
First Quarter 2004 Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater MtSE Distribution Plot
E2C Remediation
Figures
-
I
I
I
---
I...:.:l~"-"
.~
I
,
;~ '
'\
"'.1
.
.'*~
0.;
o -a.
_~ O¡
·1
- ~..
Slod dale Hwy ~ ~,8rund3ge Ln .
!<: 0 ûu;i~oOd 0 ~m.C,,"f q . i
..... p;.,.. ~..,..._..._~, IlL ''''''''''7'''~~~--::--Io.2!'''----'J''IIO...,1-=''''"''1!2:'.:tt~.-8 -..=-.;.¡;,..........-
.!':J.J ...""''''..,''... ~ ~
l:.) j~{ '~ i.;:" "~~~' ~.., .1 T. r.. ',", I 'J¡' lJ ~
"l' S¢~í~~~J-'~~~~¡1:% ,_~ ,.' 6"'II"'Té,'1 --I ,'If':;' "I~ ;"_~ ~ ':_~ '~'-
< ,4i,~.,rÇ,lfIb ':", :E.. ,:;; Sundale :~2 , ~.
. ~...._~ C nt jJ. - ~ \.'.J~J' I L.n . :;, [,. r~., ";t' ~
~<'.~'" ,r..;;¡.¡. 0 ou ry~.')- .U " -
ti..~1 .. ...., .~luÞL~;'· , ". O. j ~ ;:¡: ~'.::.', ~
'--~ E= ::~ . r I t, Ii ¡. J'" .
3 ,Sund¡Jlè~~,.; , <Gì
¿; ~ ¡,ç'1:'l:YY~ '\ " '~ F' ~"" i '"::::::, [~
::..,!; 1,';lr.g þ.'.'c !, ,~ PI;;]ffl", Dr \(:;'~~":J ~":¡:; , ',1
:--... _ (\ . I'l"' -
~ C'J .~ 1,"1 S" --
.~ . ~ ..
" Hoh" ~" ~ ~ '; :""""0"" Dc ' """""
,.:.:: '~" ._ ,. _ PIJn: Rc! ~ ~,. \~ --. L;'tc",'i :;:t
Gj'~'~'~ ~.1 .:.. .., Co ..:} -
\
W1lte Ln\, .....
, . G;" I
.-;:? ,,' ,-
g "\f:t"-1 ,ª-
.. ~ :¡:
::c -. .;.')
Co@) S"
~
1: -' '.
...
GJ ~:02 "Iavigation i!C~r.;~C'·H ~:-.'"::"~L
.. .. .:.
- - .
(")
9-
;;
CTI
:;J
C.
I
,)
c~
~
2Z ::nd ::'[
1 ~t :St
~.¡(.
f:-$' /
,\('~
,-:.
.-'"
.:0...'
.....\ '.~
"
.-....,
11th SI
(")
::¡-
~
~
~
....
r¡ [~I..Jns~t A. 'Ie r.....
~ ¡.- ~-;..": .'~
w _11r;:jtd lit
...
_,r,
,\"
~~
,~O'
c:;l>~
~rth St 0
_ "---'JJ
I
¡'"I
;-
".:j
;¿' I
i1; :t> ~
~ .;:.~
, IJ)
(T,I (tI
i.o) J!I
~ ..
:;
~
,.,.
·':':::~ ,~l"th.j::~ 0,,'
-'»
::, -<
'- "'
I
¡',/;
;-
I
I
I
I
·S', -
ü'g(: [),.'
~
~
~,.
..:~;
'þ -'
~ -L
;:¡1
a .'''__0_.'
:·O:éi,"St
,,- .
.g -
:a.
a::
G'í ,,'
J:
~~
oWible Cr~
c
.z
--
~ ~
õ ~ ~
Q
" - ::¡
,~ - ,J¡
Õ ~ :;c
c.
o Venola
---.
..
I
!;i
Q
o
"
....
g
0.
~
-: ùhrtt,) Dr
I
::tJ
a.
F'.j,:,I1",,:(, Rd
11.0km
'O.5mi'
GJ :"~J Yahoo! :r.c
-.-..- -
...
'-r',li1o A'I,;"
- - .".-. -..
I
I
I
I
I
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
SITE LOCATION MAP
I
I
ij1
cr;
-,
..
t
N
I
FIGURE
1
-
I
I I
/ LEGEND "'"\
-+- Groundwater
Monitoring Well
~ Soil Vapor
Extraction Well
~ 1997 Soil Boring
NC'NS-lí3
~ 1997 Hand Auger
Boring
B-6
e:> 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
I I
i j
I !
J '
j ¡
i .:':~ ì
@!
i:S:¡
æì
~I
I
I
I
I ¡
I I
i ,
,
I I _,
j , ','
i CD
0
CL
CD
.§
(f)
~:2?'l
.. '(77/2///"/7:°"
I a;0¡.~-,t4á
¡ I~! r/:
',,,) '/
';::;1 Ii
::%1 ¿,
~! ,,..:
;~j ~
'/"-, I/o
~ ,¡'\
~ ~ ~
~j ª I~
~j ,~ ~
¡øZ1 ~ ,..:
~r § fa
:%: ü!';:::
~~ r~ (5 j
@ ~ I
~F~~ ¡-;..oj
;~j r~: !
!%' tz· I
'~ ¡Z< I
Vd !hLJ:
f ~
~- _.~,~
~
B-9 .
'---,..,
¡ ',di\iJj'!
i ã'/..?Z/.gZ/.Z/.¿~""'C - f¡
! '%1 :.: ¡~¡ j,iC""i,' i(i ,,~¡
I ~-~, ,"; I, I I
j~:.--;: ~:~ \j IJ \J
':~ öJ :%,: :·-t';,·" , ·:~(\(:I~~(.:: f:"i';~~:;'
:d (,) ~:
I,I,~ -§ ~
~ -! ø
1i:1 >, ~
r~). ~ r;.-:,
¡~_.__?_,._._~
u¿üüü.,{//.ZI-:
II '
! ¡
I i
¡ I
I i
I I
I ¡
!
I
I
I
/ì /' ~
l3 ." Ô
\]
fd @ ß
V V
B-8 .
B-4 Ð
+
MW·2
>,
0.
o
C
(1J
Ü
.r::.
~
s
I
I
¡--¡
,_..J
+
I
I
<-
en
c
:û-l
ü"):-:::
60
o ill
0-
'If)
N«j
$
I
VES-B
CD
> I
Ci I I
. I
:.(, I I
&2 i ¡
'."!
<: i i
;-. i 1
.I : i
I i
¡ I
¡ I
¡ I
¡ I
I i
þ:\
;;';; MW-1
~¡ +
t/)1
I !
I ¡
I
,
I
I
i
I
!
Ð B-2
)8{
B-1 ell 1'1 r1
¡ ( ¡' ¡ ¡ ~ J
¡ !;;!
¡ i \
VES-A ')0(1 , Ii ¡
A -ll j
¡ t ¡ it I
Lf-l LU
I
I
I
. ¡
I:' I
I j I
L:U38(
VES-C
ø B-3
I
I
I
\
,
G B-5
I
+ MW-3
0f22?2;>:t;;;%:(:(?~/,%7.?7?:t??~:tZ.?L"/.:?;;;;e.?'.::?i';;;n:;;;W',.1
~ v ~~
,,1&,,1 0 ,S' ø 0:
"-" ~-- ~,
~, ::J E § ~:
~ ~Gü J%
'%¡ 0 0'
;h~;>/'5//"r'~~'~'<"-"~"~"~~< ,~"~,~,..·,,~·,~..c~,~,,,~, ,'0
<0" ,-"", . ,-",U/,¿¿.U,.U,/.,U/,/,/,.U,O..LIX./'/'/'/'/'¿¿,U/,ü:Z.ó
I I
II
SCALE: 1" = 40 feet
, ! I I
I
I
I
I
B,6 e>
FIGURE
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
2
I
I
SITE PLAN
E2C Remediation
5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
01
III
~ !
II
II
I !
II
¡ I
I~I
r~¡
i.~¡
~¡
! ~¡
j t
MW11
B-9 . I,,,,,,,,,,,,',,
_ Ci"IIO",,;
'Canopy I
,,'í"7/Z/'//'//ZZ2/7.'-- ,
:Z"-"âi"---í,::;: ß (;::,ß
!~ :6 ~ \5 l~ I~J
:~ :=: ~ c - -'~ \-"..
~: cD (/., ' ¡ìrrTier rUG! ,)ISp~::r;ser ;·~n~f~
!~ ª ~ ~rar9 I
~ ~ 000
:;.¿. ...J 0 ¡
:~ ::2~: Î\\ (,\ I
:~ :.0;:%: I () I ~ 10 ¡
RJ.'7..?Z/.'//zz/üL______,. \j U \) ,I
B-8 .
¡----¡
?
I
I
'°77277777777.'
V~f~1
ì%j þ~
~, !~
~j f¡z,
~i~ iâ
,,/ v,
y,¡ 'z,
~j ~~, !~
,,~J _ fz,
'/...1 I.Z'
'0' (fJ v'
~ (" ~
~¡ ¡~
:~j ~ (/)
0' ", '....
~~ ~,-,. lâ
~f 0 ,'1,
~01 ~z;
~ ü ¡~
.%, rZ,
~:\ i~
¡~ r~
'%. t:--¡
~J ,~:
W f¡~
1/.,1 %'
[r ~
~ ~.ÆL_..J
~Æ'~
2ì
o
c
,"
(.J
-
2
--
S
U)
"?j:::J
Œ:=
60
o ill
0-
-lj)
N(U
S
c
B-4 e>
~
MW-2
6 ug/L MtSE
~
c<J
Ü
VES-B
e> B-2
~
38t
~1 91H~ r¡ I
)o(I't: I U ¡ '~'I
VES-Ä Ai;:' ¡ Ii: ¡ I:, ,
LU uJ ~ u ,38( VES-C
-1\~
...... ..-.
9¿~
9.~
~~
~.~
~':)
~
~
~
2 ug/L MtSE
g B-5
I
I
I
i
I
, I
I j
, I
i I
,k MW-3
V 14 ug/L MtSE
"/ /,-, ",,'},:7/'')'%2''. ._.~w 7.ZZ/}'Z ""'h';¡;""ZZ"'Z/J'ZZ}';l"""'"7:n,
~''''!a..~ ,/,-,-Z ~""'¿~ri_~'-;_' '{'--' "'~,- ~.!" '-~"".J.
~í ~~ ~
,'01 0= 0 ¡0
~í <::::~i= f~
¡%j ~Q),êii ~
~t."---,~--..._,._~=.=",'v.9.....~-,.~--~~.,~~=.,.,,.JJ
:.u¿%Ûza:.t2zZ-t,¿U,:.taaJtO.zo.-L¿Zä/..¿¿¿o2a:_j
B-6 e>
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
FIRST QUARTER 2004
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
J J
LEGEND
A Groundwater
T Monitoring Well
)0( Soil Vapor
A Extraction Well
~ 1997 Soil Boring
¡,¡cws·1.":
(S 1997 Hand Auger
Boring
B-6
ø 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
II
L
~'(Ü
S
QJ
'
°1
I
I
¡
I
!
I
I
1'0
lCU
)0
a::
I G)
¡,S
iUS
¡
i
I
I
I
!
,
!
II
,
I
f
¡
I
¡
I
SCALE: '1 II = 40 feet
I I!~
I ¡
\
,
FIGURE
3
I
I
1
i
¡
I ¡
I ¡
II
! I
, ¡
¡ ,
II
I I
I I
! i
i I
¡ I
I '
¡ I
I '
I ¡
II
!, !
3: I !
': ¡i,1 II
11:;
~I
~ I ~ ~
II
, I
! I
! I
!
œ¡1 MW-1
þ\ ~ 2
I
I
I
I
!
I
ì
I
i
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B-9
.
¡---.-----
1 Canopy
~L/7Z7;rZ72Z2l:"-'-
::;-:; -,. - ';-;'~,. "'-;%:
~ c 0
:~ :s ~
'% ::; ~,
:~ OJ ~
~ (]). ~I
.% .D ~
;~ -3 ~j
!~ £' ~ ~~I"'\
,%- 't':' ~ (~ Ie
~Z.?2m22..?zji; \./ lJ IJ
L_____,
~\ f\ ~
8 l5 U
¡::CJ"F~" :::-uel D:,:r,DJ'C.:.r ,A. 8 = ,:.,
'@ "~""~-'
B-8 .
! . l
f
B-4
I-
,U)
?u~
0)==
60
DC!)
0-
'(f)
C,) a)
S
e
VES-B
L~;:';':" i
'(/7/,'7/.." ,':77777.1.1):;
.ra~t:-~~"'i~
~j i~
~. ~:
ižJ ¡~
[%j ~
~ì ~
~l 9J ~¡
~j £d
~' v-
I ~j ~ .~:
Bij ,~
_J .%J ~ ë:
~~ ~,'-~ ,~;
:~f .. ¡~:
~{ IZI
~1j U v'
~¡ ¡~
>%í I~
:~~ t~'
:~J ,~ I
~j I~ I
~ ~~'
~~
:_-~
>-
a.
o
c
Cü
Ü
r
(jj
ce
S
Cü
",
,-'
68-2
~
B-1 Qfl f'l ri
VES-A 38tW',1 ¡.',. . W>.' ,UJI,
I'· ¡.. '"
,~ ! ~ J8( VES-C
ø B-3
14
14 (dup)
MW-3
.
;'/,7// /7/7/77 ., 77/777;--7"'///177777'/777/7/777'/2:1'1,
¡%-.._~.~.,.~_.... ><~~-~''''''''"'-"-''''''''''~~''~''0
~j ~ ~ I~
i%' 0 = (l) :;-;'"
1%1 ' ,- :;-;'
~i 3Cü ;;: ~
Ç¿ì 4: ill Ô ,0.
~·~~-~":"~~~"'II.~~~£"w:='''\f'~t~"T'~2· -? ~ '-a:
U&¿)!.ZLZ¿/..,UX./..,uo.."uz.azz/",/./.zazzo.L ~L...!.Z <::A
E2C Remediation
5300 Wood mere Dr., Suite 105
Bakersfield, California 93313
Telephone: (661) 831-6906
Facsimile: (661) 831-6234
8-6 €)
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
FIRST QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER
MtBE ISOCONCENTRA TION PLOT
I I
LEGEND
t Groundwater
Monitoring Well
ø: Soil Vapor
Extraction Well
" 1997 Soil Boring
NC\NS-18
C 1997 Hand Auger
Boring
B-6
Ð 1999 Soil Boring
. 2003 Soil Boring
r
I
I
--0
ro
o
IT:
(])
c
tj)
I I \
SCALE: 1" = 40 feet
I I I I
I I
FIGURE
4
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
March 3 2004
TABLES
Summary of First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring
Data
Summªry of Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Summary of Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Supplemental Groundwater Analytical Data
E2C Remediation
Tables
-
"t NU""812~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --
March 3, 2004
~
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF FIRST QUARTER 2004 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CARW ASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
Januarv 22, 2004
WelllD Sample TOG Elevation Depth to Water GW Elevation B T E X I TPHç¡ TPHd MtBE TBA I DIPE ETBE TAME 1 ,2-DGA EDB
Date (feet MSL) (feet BTOC) (feet MSL) uq/L
MW-1 10/10/03 ---..--- 165.00 .......---- nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 2 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5
....--.-. .. .- -...- .. .-.--..-.--.--. .,., .-.-.". - - - ···-._4____'__··,· -',-- ,'. --~-.--,.- .-.
MW-2 10/10103 --_....-- 167.41 ..------ nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 6 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5
- - -.----... ..... .._.._...... _n _.__.. -"--..-----. _···_'·__·___4_b .... -----.
MW-3 10/10/03 ---......... 166.61 ..------ nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 na 14 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<O.5 nd<0.5
dup 10110103 nd<0.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<50 na 14 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5 nd<O.5
Notes:
1,2-DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane
B = Benzene
BTOe = Below top of casing
DIPE = Di-isopropyl Ether
dup = duplicate sample
E = Ethylbenzene
EDB::: Ethylene Dibromide (a.k.a. Dibromo Methane)
ETBE = Ethyl tertiary-butyl Ether
GW ::: Groundwater
MtBE = Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether
na = Not available
nd = Not detected at or above the Method Detection Limit, which is indicated by value.
T = Toluene
TAME::: Tertiary-Amyl Methyl Ether
TBA = Tertiary-Butyl Ether (a.k.a tert-butanol)
.
TOe = Top of casing
TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
uglkg = micrograms per liter
X = Total xylenes
· MW-4 on eoe is a duplicate sample collected from well MW-1 for quality control.
.
E2C Re.mediation
Table 1-1
·-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number 1812BK03
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
WELL ID DATE
4/2/03
6/30/03
MW-1 10/10/03
1/22/04
Total
Depth
(feet BTOC)
180.00
180.30
180.05
DEPTH
TOGW
(feet BTOC)
162.30
165.00
167.58
165.00
TOC
ELEVATION
(feet MSL)
SP
SP
SP
SP
_... ". _.'.'_0...__. ...._._.___ "_..__ . ."_._ ...,.___.._
MW-2
10/1 0/03
1/22/04
MW-3
1 0/1 0/03
1/22/04
.._n _. ...... _h' ..._ n...
NOTES:
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
GW = Groundwater
MSL = Mean Sea Level
SP = Survey Pending
TOC = Top of Casing
E2C Remediation
. ...._ ....mn..... ._ .
178.00
SP
SP
169.72
167.41
184.90
SP
SP
170.07
166.61
GW
ELEVATION
(feet MSL)
March 3, 2004
ELEVATION
CHANGE
(feet)
-2.70
-2.58
-2.58
-2.58
-2.58
Table 2-1
-.
I
Project Number 18128K03
March 3, 2004
I
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
WelllD Sample B T I E X TPHq TPHd MtBE TBA DIPE ETBE I TAME 1,2-DCA EDB I PCE Lead
Date µg/L
4/2103 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 102 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
, ' ..-.... ....... ..- .. .. .m. ,~.
6/30/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 64 8 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 nd<50 8 nd<2.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
MW·1 10/10/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
duplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
1/22104 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 2 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na
10/10/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 60 ns 20 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na na
- ,. . .,~.__a.._ .-- .......-.. . ..,. ---- +. .~ -- .". ...'--.-' .---... -~ .. u ~ ....
MW·2 1/22104 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 6 ,.,. nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 1.5 nd<50
ow. , ., .....'-.... -,_.~ ,-, _.0._'___' ,_ .... . . .~_..- -. .' -.q.-- ... ... --,-_... --"-"-'" .....__.on_.... .--".--. -. ..-... - -
10/1 0/03 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 80 ns 150 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na.. ." na
-...- ---- ---.", _0"·-,_- . n _._........_.._ --_... ..------.- -- --- ........-.-
MW-3 1/22104 ' nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 14 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na 1.6
<:IlJplicate nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<50 ns 14 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 nd<0.5 na 2
m._ ~._,.-. .- h.._ --.'----- . .--.-.. .. .~.-_. ... ..- ." n ." . , ,. ......-.--..- . -....-...-.-.. - ....-...,.- ..--..... .....- .. ....-...-
Notes:
Results in micrograms per liter (µg/l) = parts per billion (ppb)
Analytical Methods: BTEX, oxygenates, 1,2-DCA, EDB & VOCs by EPA Method 8260b; TPHg by EPA Method 8015M; dissolved lead by EPA 6010B
Method Detection Limits: BTEX - 0.5 µglL; TPHg - 50 µgIL; MtBE, ETBE, TAME, and DIPE - 0.5 µglL; TBA - 2.5 µgIL
1,2·DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane
B = Benzene
DIPE = DHsopropyl Ether
Dis. Lead = Dissolved lead
E = Ethylbenzene
EDB = Ethylene dibromide
ETBE = Ethyl tertiary-butyl Ether
MtBE = Methyl tertiary-butyl ether
na = Not analyzed
nd = Not Detected at or above Method Detection Limit, indicated by value
ns = Not Sampled
PCE = Tetrachloroethylene (a.k.a. perchloroethene)
T = Toluene
TAME = Tertiary Amyl methyl Ether
TBA = Tertiary Butyl Alcohol (a.k.a. tert-butanol)
TPHd - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel fuel
TPHg . Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline
X - Total xvlenes .'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E2C Remediation
Table 3-1
-
I:
¡'
,
I
\,
~tN~812_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---
Fe5ñiãiÿ 1, 2004
I
.
-
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENTAL GROUNDWATER ANALYSES
FORMER NIAGARA CAR WASH
1701 Stine Road
Bakersfield, California
INORGANIC ANAL VSES
Date Alkalinity :1:Bicarbona~1: carbonate:!. ..I: HYdrOXideJ Nitrate k Solids J .I. J Hardness
.................... . ....................... ........................ ....................... Chloride ....................... ......................... ....................... Sulfate TKN ............'........... Conductivity pH
WELL ID ...~~.~~~~~... ..J.~~~.?~L. ..J~~£.~.~L ...................... ..J£~.~.~.~~.... .~?~..~!~~~~~.~~. ....J!!?~~...... ..................... .................... ...J~~£.~.~~...
..................... ........................... ....................
(mg/L) (uMHOS/cm) (pH units)
4/2/03 170 170 nd<10 23 nd<10 22 350 48 0.8 184 530 7.0
_..___.._......_.___m_ n. --'.' ---....--. .. --~----.-._- '--. ..--.,.-.---- -.-----...----..,- --, - -.----."--..._-. -~.'. .------.--.- ---..-.'-----.- "_ n,.·__..... ... ., -"-..--...-...- .... .. ,. .. '.__..__ _._m_,.
7/31/03 180 180 nd<10 22 nd<10 4 370 42 2.6 364 500 7.9
MW-1 --.-.--.. ..------ ,__. __·.·...__.~'+__.n.. -.... "_-"0" ......._--+---_.-._- ._---_._-.~,-..+..- __0"-' ..___.....__.. .-....------------ -----.-.. ,. .. .-.---. .. ---- ---"-'--'-'~' ,,-.,.-.. -. .-'-'--'- .M_._n..
1/22/04 96 96 nd<10 11 nd<10 0.7 270 89 0.3 129 440 6.5
_____ ~___ _'_'_~o__ .. -~. ._--~ ~___n .---.."" -'----- ~....__._.._.._--,. - ----,. -,_._- H' --.. .... -..-..-.. .....-...-.-..--- ---. om,__._ . - .-..,- -.-- -'--' .....--'" _.----.. ,...,
MW-2 1/22/04 200 200 nd<10 17 nd<10 2.1 260 23 0.3 269 460 7.3
-..-' -...---.-- .._n __n___'__ ~_._ o. __.. __._u_. .d_ - ---. ...._---.-- ..-.--..-"'-"-'.-..' -- ...... -...-.. --...---. -'--'-'---'" ---. ...~.- 0_____-. _._._ .-.,........,. .----.
1/22/04 160 160 nd<10 9 nd<10 1.2 200 13 0.3 114 370 7.5
MW-3 .." ~. ,- .-'" ,.. .... .. .. --.- ·...__h --..- .--,.- , .. .. ....._...~~-- .------ -.-.---,..--. ,,- ..- . .~_.__.. . '-.--- .,. .....- .. ..
I I
METALS ANALYSES
WELL ID Date .....~.~~~!.~~....I.....~~.~p..!~.....I........~~~.~.......l~~.~~.!~!~.~.~~.~~.~~.!~:L.~~~~.~~!~~..L..~~.~!~~....J.......~!.~~.....
....................
Total in mg/L .
412/03 54.9 nd<0.010 8.2 11.3 0.01 7.26 45.8 0.067
-,-------_... -.-. ....._.__."'-~._--_._,... ___ _ n _ _____.. _.__... -.-.-.....-----..-.- ---.----.--.--.-.. ---.. .. .-. -'-~----'--' .----"'--...-..-..
MW-1 7/31/03 77.3 0.078 156 41.5 3.51 27.1 44.2 0.551
~---'----"'" ..-',. ,- ·.·n.·· . - ----- ,. .. ...- .-.-.-.---- --.. --- .-- -_.- . --..--, .,---..----. ..~ ..'-' ., ,
1/22/04 39.3 nd<0.010 2.4 8.0 0.05 4.22 37.8 nd<20
...-'..-.. . "-....,,....- ... .---... _____".._ .n...__ "-_...-' ,_.~-_._-- '---'-~-- -~. .. ,'. ... .... .....---- "_,-.-- .--'-""'-' ......- ..' ...,
MW-2 1/22/04 61.3 0.068 111 28.3 3.02 17.8 45.0 0.383
-." .... ....." .......-- -------.....-... ........--.......--..-,- '-.--.- ,. -
MW-3 1/22/04 34.5 nd<0.010 0.836 6.7 0.02 3.07 35.6 nd<20
..,_.___u._ ,.. ... .. ---.. ---- -"'--.....- ,-, '-' .. .--....--- -..,.--..-. ... --"'.. ,,' .-....,,-. ....._--.. --- -- ~-_. .n ,-
Notes:
< . Not Detected at or above method detection limit, which is indicated by value
CaC03 = as Calcium Carbonate
mg/L = Milligrams per liter, equivalent to parts per million (ppm)
TDS = Total Dissolved solids
TKN = Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
E2C Remediation
Table 4-1
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
March 3. 2004
APPENDICES
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Laboratory
Report and Chain-of-Custody
January 2004 Supplemental Groundwater Analytical
Report
Purged Groundwater Disposal Manifest
E2C Remediation
Appendices
---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03 March 3.2004
APPENDIX A
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Purge Data Sheets
E2C Remediation Appendix A
Halcyon Laboratories
Chain of Custody Form
~
Client Name: E~C Remediation, LLC 661.831.6906 fax 661.831.6234 Analysis Requested Sample Matrix
~_~. ..._. _·····__~___._.n
Project Name: \-\0~ i rJ IV\11 ( f)(1A cAO V IU ).{ :õ :õ <::!:.\ ~Queous
ß ß :õ (I
:? :õ N N ß ~
Client Address: 5300 Woodmere Dr., Suite 105. Bakersfield, CA 93313 IX) IX) N
:õ :õ II) :? ß ~ ~ :õ !2.. ç~
N ª- II) N 11. 11. ß IJ) r¡<:) DSOil
N IX) \:!. \:!. Q;
Project Manager: ß,LL 0 2 §, ~ N
LA vv'JO.v IX) Q II> IJ) IX) 0> :õ ~
.£ 11. Q .2l c
~ ~ ¡¡; uJ ñi ~ Q ß <r
_.._-- 11. 11. Õ "' 11.' >
uJ IJ) IJ) c c ~ ro N ,j D Acidified
Sampler Name: \), e \h" L [. ¿ \:!. "' Q IJ) Q Q 0 !2..
.~ II\/'\)\'. n....!o.·j uJ 0 Õ ~ 0> 0> W II> ......
X >- >- x
. ' uJ CD :r: :r: ro x x m '0 uJ ...)
l- I- 11. a. Õ 0 0 I- ro I- ->
Q
Sample Date Sample Time Sample Description and Container Type m ¿ l- I- > II) "- ¿ ...J m .:> Comments
i.J..
.J.?L, () I () '3 0(;:10 T G lAlv\( ill!) ,'"\ 'I \/ I) ,1 -X x: ." \. ~(/5¿
i o )'. S")~ \'-'r~ - 3 1.. L¡ () .""\ ,I 1.10,1) )( Y ~. X: be¡ S,?~
-
Oß·· 50 \\ y/- 2 '! 41) If"'\, II v~/} ~ 'x; r X- bV59
'-I
lO·.15 M \./-1 1..¡ let () \r\., \ vðA X 'K ~ \ ?c.¡SJ
--~.
¿ \ a: 7.f) V\y-lt ) l II ."'.. VI)/J )< )( >< >< W*
----
./
/"
Turnaround Time Requested: 24 Hour 48 Hour 5-Day _ Standard ........... \
- ---- -
v
c..-
.........
---
~
- -
Relinquished By:
Received By:
. Date:
Date:
Relinquished By:
Received By:
-
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
APPENDIX B
First Quarter 2004 Groundwater Analytical Report
March 3. 2004
E2C Remediation
AppenätX B
.
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 L~boratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
Certification # 1920
I CLIENT: E2C Remediation
I 5300 W oodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project ill : Niagra Car Wash
Analysis Date: 1/22/2004
Report Date: 1/23/2004
I Sample ill : 7036-001 Travel Blank
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 0.5 ug/L
I Chloromethane NO 0.5 ug/L
Vinyl Chloride NO 0.5 uglL
Methane, bromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Chloroethane NO 0.5 ug/L
Trichloromonofluoromethane NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1,1-dichloro- (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
Methylene Chloride NO 0.5 ug/L
I t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol NO 2.5 ug/L
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
1 Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1-dichloro- NO 0.5 uglL
Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.5 ug/L
I Propane, 2,2-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (Z)- ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane. bromochloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Chloroform ND 0.5 ug/L
1 Ethane, 1,1, 1,-trichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.5 . ug/L
1-Propene, 1, 1-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Benzene ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-Dichloro (1,2-DCA) NO 0.5 ug/L
Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.5 uglL
Trichloroethylene NO 0.5 ug/L
I Propane, 1,2-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Methane, dibromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromodichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
1 1-Propene. 1,3--dichloro·, (Z)- NO 0.5 ug/L
Toluene ND 0.5 ug/L
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro·, (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Ethane, 1.1 ,2-trichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene NO 0.5 ug/L
I
I' Page 1 of 10
·
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 L~boratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
7036-001 Travel Blank
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
I Propane, 1,3-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Methane, dibromochloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-dibromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, chloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Ethylbenzene NO 0.5 ug/L
m & p Xylenes NO 0.5 ug/L
o-Xylenes NO 0.5 ug/L
I Styrene NO 0.5 ug/L
Bromoform NO 0.5 ug/L
Isopropyl benzene NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1, 1,2-tetrachloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Propane, 1,2,3-trichloro NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, bromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, propyl- NO 0.5 ug/L
I 2-chlorotoluene NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl- NO 0.5 ug/L
4-chlorotoluene NO 0.5 ug/L
I Benzene, tert-butyl- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl- NO 0.5 ug/L
sec-butylbenzene NO 0.5 ug/L
4-isopropyltoluene NO 0.5 ug/L
I Benzene, 1,3-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,4-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, butyl- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Benzene, 1,2-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro NO 0.5 ug/L
I 1,3-butadiene, 1,1 ,2,3,4,4-hexachloro- NO 0.5 ugJL
Napthalene ' NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,3-trichloro NO 0.5 uglL
I
Internal Standards Results % Recovery
I Benzene, fluoro 50.0 100
Benzene-d5, chloro- 50.0 100
I 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 50.0 100
Surrogate Standards
I Methane, dibromofluoro- 49.4 99%
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 50.7 101%
Toluene-d8 50.8 102%
I p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) 51.1 102%
I
Page 2 of 10
I I
.
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 L~boratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
I Certification # 1920
CLIENT: E2C Remediation
I 5300 W oodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project ill : Niagra Car Wash
Analysis Date: 1/22/2004
I Report Date: 1/23/2004
Sample ill : 7036-001 MW-l
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 0.5 ug/L
I Chloromethane ND 0.5 ug/L
Vinyl Chloride NO 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Chloroethane NO 0.5 ug/L
Trichloromonofluorom,ethane NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1, 1-dichloro- (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Methylene Chloride NO 0.5 ug/L
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol NO 2.5 ug/L
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 2 0.5 ug/L
I Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1, 1-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 2,2-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (Z)- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Methane, bromochloro- NO . 0.5 ug/L
Chloroform NO 0.5 . . ug/L
Ethane, 1,1, 1,-trichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO 0.5 ug/L
I 1-Propene, 1, 1-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
Benzene NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-Dichloro (1,2-DCA) NO 0.5 ug/L
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0.5 ug/L
Trichloroethylene NO 0.5 ug/L
Propane. 1,2-dichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
I Methane, dibromo- NO 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromodichloro- NO 0.5 ug/L
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-. (Z)- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Toluene NO 0.5 ug/L
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-. (E)- NO 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1 ,2-trichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Tetrachloroethylene NO 0.5 ug/L
Page 3 of 10
I
·
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EPA 82608 L~boratory Report
Analyte
Propane, 1,3-dichloro-
Methane, dibromochloro-
Ethane, 1,2-dibromo-
Benzene, chloro-
Ethylbenzene
m & p Xylenes
o-Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropyl benzene
Ethane, 1,1,1 ,2-tetrachloro-
Propane, 1,2,3-trichloro
Benzene, bromo-
Benzene, propyl-
2-chlorotoluene
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-
4-chlorotoluene
Benzene, tert-butyl-
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl-
sec-butylbenzene
4-isopropyltoluene
Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-
Benzene, 1,4-dichloro-
Benzene, butyl-
Benzene, 1,2-dichloro-
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro-
Benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro
1,3-butadiene, 1,1 ,2,3,4,4-hexachloro-
Napthalene
Benzene, 1,2,3-trichloro
Internal Standards
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro-
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
Result
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
Results
50.0
50.0
50.0
498.8
49.7
50.5
51.1
7036-001 MW-1
Water Sample Results in ug/L
Page 4 of 10
Method RL
Units
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/l
uglL
ug/L
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/L
% Recovery
100
100
100
998%
99%
101%
102%
·
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 l~boratory Report
I Certification # 1920
CLIENT: EzC Remediation
I 5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
,I Project ill : Niagra Car Wash
Analysis Date: 1/22/2004
I Report Date: 1/23/2004
Sample ID : 7036-003 MW-2
I Analyte Result Method RL
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.5
I Ch loromethane ND 0.5
Vinyl Chloride ND 0.5
Methane, bromo- ND 0.5
I Chloroethane ND 0.5
Trichloromonofluoromethane ND 0.5
Ethene, 1, 1-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5
I Methylene Chloride ND 0.5
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol ND 2.5
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 6 0.5
I Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.5
Ethane, 1,1-dichloro- ND 0.5
I Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) NO 0.5
Propane, 2,2-dichloro- NO 0.5
Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (Z)- NO 0.5
Methane, bromochloro- NO 0.5
I Chloroform NO 0.5
Ethane, 1,1, 1,-trichloro- NO 0.5
Carbon tetrachloride NO 0.5
I 1-Propene, 1, 1-dichloro- NO 0.5
Benzene NO 0.5
Ethane, 1,2-Dichloro (1,2-DCA) NO 0.5
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0.5
Trichloroethylene NO 0.5
Propane, 1,2-dichloro- NO 0.5
I Methane, dibromo- NO 0.5
Methane, bromodichloro- ND 0.5
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-, (Z)- NO 0.5
Toluene NO 0.5
I 1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-, (E)- NO 0.5
Ethane, 1, 1,2-trichloro- NO 0.5
Tetrachloroethylene 1.5 0.5
I
Page 5 of 10
I
Water Sample Results in uglL
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EPA 82608 Laboratory Report
Analyte
Propane, 1,3-dichloro-
Methane, dibromochloro-
Ethane, 1.2-dibromo-
Benzene, chloro-
Ethylbenzene
m & p Xylenes
o-Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
Ethane, 1, 1,1,2-tetrachloro-
Propane, 1,2,3-trichloro
Benzene, bromo-
Benzene, propyl-
2-ehlorotoluene
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-
4-chlorotoluene
Benzene, tert-butyl-
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl-
see-butyl benzene
4-isopropyltoluene
Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-
Benzene, 1,4-diehloro-
Benzene, butyl-
Benzene, 1,2-dichloro-
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro-
Benzene, 1,2,4-triehloro
1,3-butadiene, 1,1 ,2,3,4,4-hexaehloro-
Napthalene
Benzene, 1,2,3-triehloro
Internal Standards
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1 ,4-Diehlorobenzene-d4
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro-
1,2-Diehloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
Result'
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Results
50.0
50.0
50.0
49.7
49.6
51.2
51.4
7036-003 MW-2
Water Sample Results in ug/L
Page 6 of 10
Method RL
Units
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
uglL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
% Recovery
100
100
100
99%
99%
102%
103%
·
I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 La.boratory Report
, I Certification # 1920
CLIENT: E2C Remediation
I 5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project ill : Niagra Car Wash
Analysis Date: 1/22/2004
I Report Date : 1/23/2004
Sample ID : 7036-004 MW-3
I Analyte Resúlt Method RL
I Oichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.5
Chloromethane ND 0.5
Vinyl Chloride ND 0.5
Methane, bromo- ND 0.5
I Chloroethane ND 0.5
Trichloromonofluoromethane ND 0.5
Ethene, 1, 1-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5
I Methylene Chloride ND 0.5
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol ND 2.5
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 14 0.5
I Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5
Oiisopropyl Ether (OIPE) ND 0.5
Ethane, 1,1-dichloro- ND 0.5
I Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND 0.5
Propane, 2,2-dichloro- ND 0.5
Ethene, 1 ,2-dichloro- (Z)- ND 0.5
Methane, bromochloro- NO 0.5
I Chloroform NO 0.5
Ethane, 1,1,1 ,-trichloro- NO 0.5
Carbon tetrachloride NO 0.5
I 1-Propene, 1,1-dichloro- NO 0.5
Benzene NO 0.5
Ethane, 1,2-Dichloro (1,2-DCA) NO 0.5
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) NO 0.5
Trichloroethylene ND 0.5
Propane, 1,2-dichloro- NO 0.5
I Methane, dibromo- NO 0.5
Methane, bromodichloro- NO 0.5
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-, (Z)- NO 0.5
I Toluene NO 0.5
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-, (E)- ND 0.5
Ethane, 1,1,2-trichloro- NO 0.5
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.5
I
Page 7 of 10
I
Water Sample Results in ug/L
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uglL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EP A 82608 La.boratory Report
7036-004 MW-3
Water Sample Results in ug/L
Analyte Result Method RL Units
Propane, 1,3-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane, dibromochloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-dibromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, chloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/L
m & p Xylenes ND 0.5 ug/L
o-Xylenes ND 0.5 ug/L
Styrene ND 0.5 ug/L
Bromoform ND 0.5 ug/L
Isopropyl benzene ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1,1 ,2-tetrachloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2,3-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, bromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene. propyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
2-chlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
4-chlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene. tert-butyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1 ,2,4-trimethyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
sec-butylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/L
4-isopropyltoluene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1 ,3-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene. 1,4-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, butyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
1,3-butadiene, 1,1 ,2,3,4,4-hexachloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Napthalene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,3-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
Internal Standards
Results
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
50.0
50.0
50.0
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro-
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
48.8
49.8
50.8
51.0
Page 8 of 10
% Recovery
100
100
100
98%
100%
102%
102%
· ---------
I I Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
I EPA 82608 Laboratory Report Water Sample Results in ug/L
I Certification # 1920
CLIENT: E2C Remediation
I 5300 W oodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
I Project ill : Niagra Car Wash
Analysis Date: 1/22/2004
I Report Date : 1/23/2004
Sample ill : 7036-005 MW-4
I Analyte Result Method RL Units
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.5 ug/L
I Chloromethane' ND 0.5 ug/L
Vinyl Chloride ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Chloroethane ND 0.5 ug/L
Trichloromonofl uoromethane ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1, 1-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Methylene Chloride ND 0.5 ug/L
t-Butanol (TBA) Tert-Butyl Alcohol ND 2.5 ug/L
Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 14 0.5 ug/L
I Ethene, 1,2-dichloro- (E)- ND 0.5 ug/L
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 2,2-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethene, 1 ,2-dichloro- (2)- ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromochloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Chloroform ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1, 1,1,-trichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.5 ug/L
I 1-Propene, 1, 1-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-Dichloro (1,2-DCA) ND 0.5 ug/L
I Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.5 ug/L
Trichloroethylene ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Methane, dibromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane, bromodichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-, (2)- ND 0.5 ug/L
I Toluene ND 0.5 ug/L
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro·, (E)- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1,2-trichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene 1.7 0.5 ug/L
I
Page 9 of 10
I
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Halcyon Laboratories, Inc.
EP A 82608 Laboratory Report
Water Sample Results in ug/L
7036-005 MW-4
Analyte Result Method RL Units
Propane, 1,3-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Methane, dibromochloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,2-dibromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, chloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/L
m & p Xylenes ND 0.5 ug/L
o-Xylenes ND 0.5 ug/L
Styrene ND 0.5 ug/L
Bromoform ND 0.5 ug/L
Isopropyl benzene ND 0.5 ug/L
Ethane, 1,1 ,1 ,2-tetrachloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2,3-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, bromo- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, propyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
2-chlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
4-chlorotoluene ND 0.5 ug/L ,
Benzene, tert-butyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
sec-butylbenzene ND 0.5 ug/L
4-isopropyltoluene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,3-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,4-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, butyl- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2-dichloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
1,3-butadiene, 1,1 ,2,3,4,4-hexachloro- ND 0.5 ug/L
Napthalene ND 0.5 ug/L
Benzene, 1,2,3-trichloro ND 0.5 ug/L
Internal Standards
Results
% Recovery
Benzene, fluoro
Benzene-d5, chloro-
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
100
100
100
50.0
50.0
50.0
Surrogate Standards
Methane, dibromofluoro-
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
p-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)
100%
100%
102%
103%
49.9
49.9
51.2
51.5
Page 10 of 10
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
APPENDIX C
January 2004 Supplemental Groundwater Analytical Report
March 3, 2004
EP Remediation
Appendix C
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
6925 Canoga Avenue
.
.
~t~olumbia
~ Analytical
Services INC.
Canoga Park,California 91303
(818) 587-5550 ph
(818) 587-5555 fax
An Employee, Owned Company
February 18, 2004
Bill Lawson
E2C Remediation, LLC
5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105
Bakersfield, CA 93313
RE: Niagara Car Wash
Dear Bill:
Enclosed are the results of the samples submitted to our laboratory on January 23,2004. The
samples were sent out for partial analysis to our Redding facility. Please find their report
(#DC240007) attached. For your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service
request number L2400146.
All analyses were performed in accordance with our laboratory's quality assurance program.
Results are intended to be considered in their entirety and apply only to the samples analyzed.
Columbia Analytical Services is not responsible for use of less than the complete report.
Columbia Analytical Services is certified for environmental analyses by the California
Department of Health Services (certificate number: 1296A); NELAP (certificate number:
02115CA); Los Angeles County Laboratory ID (No. 10151); and Arizona Department of Health
Services (License number: AZ0136 and AZ0544).
If you have any questions, please call me at (818) 587-5550, extension 310.
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
5~~
Stuart Sigman
Project Chemist
SS/sa
1
.
NELAP Accredited
ACIL Seal of Excellence Award
·
I
I 801SM
ASTM
BOD
I BTEX
CAM
CAS Number
CFC
I COD
CRDL
D
DL
I DLCS
DMS
DOH or DHS
I ELAP
EPA
GC
GC/MS
I IC
ICB
ICP
ICV
I LCS
LUFT
M
I MBAS
MDL
MRL
MS
I MTBE
NA
NC
I ND
NTU
ppb
ppm
I PQL
QAlQC
RCRA
RPD
I SIM
SM
STLC
I SW
TCLP
TDS
I TPH
TRPH
TSS
TILC
I VOA
I U
J
B
E
I N
D
X
I
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Acronyms
California DHS LUFT Method
American Society for Testing and Materials
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
BenzenelT oluenelEthy Ibenzene/X y ¡enes
California Assessment Metals
Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number
Chloro fl uorocarbon
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Contract Required Detection Limit
Detected; result must be greater than zero.
Detected; result must be greater than the detection limit.
Duplicate Laboratory Control Sample
Duplicate Matrix Spike
Department of Health Services
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Ion Chromatography
Initial Calibration Blank sample
Inductively Coupled Plasma atomic ernission spectrometry
Initial Calibration Verification sample
Laboratory Control Sample
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Modified
Methylene Blue Active Substances
Method Detection Limit
Method Reporting Limit
Matrix Spike
Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether
Not Applicable
Not Calculated
None Detected at or above the Method Reporting/Detection Limit (MRL/MDL)
Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Parts Per Billion
Parts Per Million
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Relative Percent Difference
Selected Ion Monitoring
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed., 1992.
Solubility Threshold Limit Concentration
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW -846,
Third Edition, 1986 and as amended by Updates I, II, lIA, and lIB.
Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total Suspended Solids
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
Volatile Organic Analyte(s)
Qualifiers
Undetected at or above MDUMRL (PQL).
Estimated concentration. Analyte detected above MDL but below MRL (PQL).
Hit above MRL (PQL) also found in Method Blank.
Analyte concentration above high point ofICAL.
Presumptive evidence of compound.
Result from dilution.
See case narrative.
2
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagara Car Wash
Water
Service Request No.: L2400146
Date Received: 1/23/04
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were perfonned consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. (CAS).
This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables. When appropriate to the
method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Additional quality control analyses reported
herein include: Matrix/Duplicate Matrix Spike (MS/DMS), and Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).
Sample Receipt
Water samples were received for analysis at Columbia Analytical Services on 1/23/04. No discrepancies were noted
upon initial sample inspection. The samples were received in good condition and consistent with the accompanying
chain of custody fonn unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receipt Fonn included in this data package. The
samples were stored at 4°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Total Metals
No anomalies were encountered.
Dissolved Metals
Samples were split, filtered and preserved in the laboratory.
General Chemistrv Parameters
Sample MW -1 was received and analyzed for pH outside of the recommended maximum holding time
Approved by
--55
;;; j¡ If 10 0/
, I
3
Date
·
I
'ient :
)roject Name:
10ject No. :
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
- Cover Page -
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA PACKAGE
Service Request: L2400146
,Iments:
I
Iproved By:
I
Sample Name:
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
Lab Code:
L2400 146-00 1
L2400146-002
L2400146-003
5~~~ 4- Date:
':Ãhð'/oq
, /
·
lent:
, I, o~ectName :
Ject No. :
trix:
I
I..p1e Name:
!b' Code:
I
Ilyte
Id
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
l.:ULUMHlA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-l
L2400 146-00 1
Analysis Method
60108
Analytical Report
Dissolved Metals
MRL
50
5
Date Analyzed
02/02/04
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample
Result
Result
Notes
ND
·
I
:::lient:
I) o~ectName :
Ject No. :
atrix:
I
!nPle Name:
.ab Code:
I
lalyte
Id
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
COLUMB"IAANAL YTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-2
L2400146-002
Analysis Method
6010B
Analytical Report
Dissolved Metals
MRL
50
6
Date Analyzed
02/02/04
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 0 l/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Units: ugIL (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample
Result
Result
Notes
ND
·
lent:
I~ect Name:
Ject No. :
trix:
I
Iple Name:
,ab Code:
I
Ilyte
Id
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-3
L2400146-003
Analysis Method
60108
Analytical Report
Dissolved Metals
MRL
50
7
Date Analyzed
02/02/04
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample
Result
Result
Notes
ND
.
I
lient :
Project Name:
IOject No. :
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
- Cover Page -
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA PACKAGE
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Service Request: L2400146
lments:
I
Iproved By:
I
Sample Name:
MW-l
MW-l
MW-l
MW-2
MW-3
Laboratory Control Sample
Method Blank
:5Á.J:2Ç ,
8
Date:
Lab Code:
. L2400 146-00 1
L2400 146-00 1 S
L2400 146-00 1 SD
L2400146-002
L2400146-003
L2400146-LCS
L2400146-MB
;;J1 Ý" '-I
·
'¡ent :
lo~ectName :
Ject No. :
atrix :
I
InPle Name:
Jab Code:
,I
lalyte
lcium
per
1agnesium
Ing~ese
assmm
,odium
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
tments:
I
II
I
COLUMBIA ANAL YTICAL SERVICES~]NC.
Analytical Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
MW-1
L2400 146-00 1
Total Metals
Units: ugIL (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample Result
Analysis Method MRL Date Analyzed Result Notes
60 lOB 200 02/02/04 39300
60 lOB 10 02/02/04 ND
60 lOB 100 02/02/04 2390
6010B 200 02/02/04 7600
60 lOB 10 02/02/04 49
6010B 2500 02/02/04 4220
60 lOB 500 02/02/04 37800
60 lOB 20 02/02/04 ND
9
.-
, tent:
'roject Name:
tject No. :
trix:
I
Lp'e Name:
!-; Code:
I
lalyte
~ium
.per
lagnesium
IInganese
.assium
odium
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
-------çULUMJ:UA ANALYTILAL ~.t;KVICJ£S, INL.
Analytical Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-2
L2400146-002
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Total Metals
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample Result
Analysis Method MRL Date Analyzed Result Notes
60108 200 02/02/04 61300
6010B 10 02/02/04 68
60108 100 02/02/04 111000
60108 200 02/02/04 28300
60108 10 02/02/04 3020
60108 2500 02/02/04 17800
6010B 500 02/02/04 45000
60108 20 02/02/04 383
10
·
'ient:
>rojectName :
IOject No. :
atrix :
I
ImPle Name:
Jab Code:
I
lalyte
I' ldum
pper
n
tfagnesium
Ing~nese
asslUm
:odium
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
lments:
I
I
I
LULU1VltilA.IUiIAL YTICAL :SEKYICES;-INC.
Analytical Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-3
L2400146-003
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Total Metals
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample Result
Analysis Method MRL Date Aòalyzed Result Notes
6010B 200 02/02/04 34500
60 lOB 10 02/02/04 ND
60 lOB 100 02/02/04 836
6010B 200 02/02/04 6680
60 lOB 10 02/02/04 20
60 lOB 2500 02/02/04 3070
60 lOB 500 02/02/04 35600
6010B 20 02/02/04 ND
11
·
lent:
I' o~ect Name:
Ject No. :
trix:
I
I..ple Name:
~ Code:
I
Ilyte
lium
per
ead
.nesium
~ganese
otassium
r~um
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
LULUIVIJ:SlAANAL Y llLAL ðJ'.oK V lÇEð, INL.
Analytical Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
Method Blank
L2400146-MB
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: NA
Date Received: NA
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Total Metals
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
Sample Result
Analysis Method MRL Date Analyzed Result Notes
6010B 200 02/02/04 ND
6010B 10 02/02/04 ND
6010B 100 02/02/04 ND
6010B 50 02/02/04 ND
6010B 200 02/02/04 ND
6010B 10 02/02/04 ND
6010B 2500 02/02/04 ND
6010B 500 02/02/04 ND
6010B 20 02/02/04 ND
12
.
_ient :
.) o~ect Name:
oJect No. :
atrix:
I
ImPle Name:
..ab Code:
I
I
.nalyte
tium
. per
.·on
l:neSiurn
1anganese
I~sium
mm
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
MW-l
L2400 146-00 1 S
l.:ULUMHIA ANALYTICAL ~I!;KVIC~~, INl.:.
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Date Analyzed: 02/02/04
Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary
Total Metals
L2400 146-00 1 SD
Units: ugIL (ppb)
Basis: NA
. Prep Analysis CAS Relative
Spike Level Sample Spike Result Acceptance Percent Result
Method Method MRL MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference
Notes
30 lOA 60 lOB 200 5000 5000 39300 43600 44200 86 98 75-125 I
3010A 60 lOB 10 500 500 ND 481 484 96 97 80-113 <1
3010A 6010B 100 5000 5000 2390 7190 7340 96 99 75-125 2
3010A 60 lOB 50 5000 5000 ND 4830 4890 97 98 80-118 1
30 lOA 60 lOB 200 5000 5000 7600 12300 12500 94 98 75-125 2
3010A 60 lOB 10 500 500 48.6 533 539 97 98 75-125 1
3010A 60 lOB 2500 20000 20000 4220 23200 23300 95 95 75-125 <1
3010A 6010B 500 25000 25000 37800 60800 61600 92 95 75-125 1
3010A 60 lOB 20 500 500 ND 498 503 100 101 85-113 <1
13
.
I
:lient :
I~ect Name:
Ject No. :
atrix :
I
Jple Name:
ab Code:
I
I
I~yte
elUm
I:er
[agnesium
Ig~nese
sSlUm
) ium
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
Iments:
I
I
I
. COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QAlQC Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
Water
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: NA
Date Received: NA
Date Extracted: 01/30/04
Date Analyzed: 02/02/04
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Total Metals
Laboratory Control Sample
L2400146-LCS
Units: ug/L (ppb)
Basis: NA
CAS Percent
Recovery
Acceptance Result
Analysis Method True Value Result Percent Limits Notes
6010B 5000 4920 98 90-113
60lOB 500 492 98 88-1l1
60 lOB 5000 4990 100 98-120
60 lOB 5000 4990 100 89-115
60 lOB 5000 4860 97 90-109
6010B 500 499 100 94-109
6010B 20000 19800 99 81-1l9
60lOB 25000 25800 103 79-125
60 lOB 500 492 98 93-107
14
·
I
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INe.
I Client: E2C Remediation, LLC
Project: Niagra Car Wash
I Sample Matrix: Water
I Prep Method: METHOD
Analysis Method: 8M 23408
Test Notes:
I
Sample Name Lab Code
I MW-l
MW-2
MW-3
I Method Blank
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Approved By:
IIA/020597P
I
L2400 146-00 1
L2400146-002
L2400146-003
L240130-MBl
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 1/22/04
Date Received: 1/23/04
Hardness, Total as CaC03
Units: mg/L (ppm)
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date Result
MRL Factor Digested Analyzed Result Notes
1/30/04 2/2/04 129
1/30/04 2/2/04 269
1/30/04 2/2/04 114
1/30/04 2/2/04 ND
'S'5
';)))g/VLj
, ,
Date:
00146ICP,AF2 ,Sample 215/04
15
IMETWAT,XLT
·
I
lient :
[>roject Name:
IOject Number:
mple Matrix:
--- - ---
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
I
;ample Name:
I' b Code:
t Notes:
MW-l
L2400146-001
lalyte
\Ikalinityas CaC03, Total
larbonate as CaC03
bonate as CaC03
~ oride
::onduetivity
troxide as CaC03
rate as Nitrogen
)H
lids, Total Dissolved (TDS)
fate
I
I
I
I
Units
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
uMHOS/em
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
pH UNITS
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
Analysis
Method
310.1
310.1
310.1
300.0
120.1
310.1
300.0
150.1
160.1
300.0
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Inorganic Parameters
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date
MRL Factor Analyzed Extracted Result
IO 1 01/23/04 NA 96
10 1 01/23/04 NA 96
10 1 01/23/04 NA ND
1 1 01/23/04 NA 11
10 1 01/23/04 NA 440
10 1 01/23/04 NA ND
0.2 1 01/23/04 NA 0.7
1 01/23/04 NA 6.5
IO 1 01/23/04 NA 270
20 IO 01/23/04 NA 89
Result
Notes
B1
I
I
B 1 Sample was received and analyzed outside of the recommended maximum holding time.
I
I
I
\pproved By
55"
1 6 Date:
~tð'loi.f
, ,
l0rt By:NKuperman
·
I
li'ent :
~roject Name:
IOject Number:
mple Matrix:
I
;ample Name:
I· b Code:
t Notes:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
MW-2
L2400146-002
lalyte
\lkalinity as CaC03, Total
larbonate as CaC03
bonate as CaC03
_ oride
:onductivity
IdroXide as CaC03
rate as Nitrogen
)H
lids, Total Dissolved (TDS)
fate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\pproved By
Units
mglL (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
uMHOS/cm
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
pH UNITS
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
Analysis
Method
310.1
310.1
310.1
300.0
120.1
310.1
300.0
150.1
160.1
300.0
55
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Inorganic Parameters
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date Result
MRL Factor Analyzed Extracted Result Notes
10 01/23/04 NA 200
10 01/23/04 NA 200
10 01/23/04 NA NO
1 01/23/04 NA 17
10 01/23/04 NA 460
10 01/23/04 NA NO
0.2 01/23/04 NA 2.1
01/23/04 NA 7.3
10 01/23/04 NA 260
2 01/23/04 NA 23
1 7 Date:
~ Ii 8/0t-J
/ ,
l0rt By:NKupelTllan
·
I I
I
lent:
)roject Name:
"ject Number:
þple Matrix:
I
;ample Name:
I Code:
t Notes:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
MW-3
L2400146-003
lalyte
dkalinity as CaC03, Total
I· arbonate as CaC03
bonate as CaC03
, oride
:onductivity
lroxide as CaC03
ate as Nitrogen
H
I'ds, Total Dissolved (TDS)
ate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~pproved By
Units
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
uMHOS/cm
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
pH UNITS
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
Analysis
Method
310.1
310.1
310.1
300.0
120.1
310.1
300.0
150.1
160.1
300.0
55
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Inorganic Parameters
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date Result
MRL Factor Analyzed Extracted Result Notes
10 01/23/04 NA 160
10 01/23/04 NA 160
10 01/23/04 NA ND
1 01/23/04 NA 9
10 01/23/04 NA 370
10 01/23/04 NA ND
0.2 01/23/04 NA 1.2
01/23/04 NA 7.5
10 01/23/04 NA 200
2 01/23/04 NA 13
1 8 Date:
';) /; fJ ~ Y"
, ,
l0rt By:NKupennan
·
I
lent:
>roject Name:
10ject Number:
mple Matrix:
I
;ample Name:
It Code:
.t Notes:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES; INC.
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
Method Blank
L2400146-MB
lalyte
\lkalinity as CaC03, Total
larbonate as CaC03
bonate as CaC03
, oride
Iydroxide as CaC03
late as Nitrogen
ids, Total Dissolved (TDS)
;ulfate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iproved By
Units
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mglL (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
mg/L (ppm)
Analysis
Method
310.1
310.1
310.1
300.0
310.1
300.0
160.1
300.0
5's
Analytical Report
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: NA
Date Received: NA
Inorganic Parameters
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date Result
MRL Factor Analyzed Extracted Result Notes
10 01/23/04 NA ND
10 01/23/04 NA ND
10 01/23/04 NA ND
1 01/23/04 NA ND
10 01/23/04 NA ND
0.2 01/23/04 NA ND
10 01/23/04 NA ND
2 01/23/04 NA ND
1 9 Date:
?-1/8'Io'l
, /
l0rt By:NKupennan
·
lent:
'roject Name:
IOject Number:
mple Matrix:
I
tP1e Name:
Code:
'est Notes;
I
Ilyte
:hloride
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~pproved By
l0rt By:NKupennao
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QAJQC Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
MW-3
L2400146-003MS
Prep Analysis
Method Method
METHOD 300.0
Service Request:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary
L2400146
01/22/04
01/23/04
NA
01/23/04
L2400146-003DMS
Units: mg/L (ppm)
Basis: NA
Spike CAS Relative
Spike Level Sample Spike Result Recovery Acceptance Percent Result
MRL MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes
10.0 10.0 8.25 18.2 18.1 100 99 80-120 <I
~·5
20 Date:
'd-/J F /0 'I
, ,
·
lient :
Project Name:
IOject Number:
mple Matrix:
I
ImPle Name:
b Code :
fest Notes:
I
lalYte
~itrate as Nitrogen
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WpmV'd By
l0rt By:NKuperman
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QA/QC Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
MW-3
L2400146-003MS
Prep Analysis
Method Method
METHOD 300.0
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: NA
Date Analyzed: 01/23/04
Matrix SpikelDuplicate Matrix Spike Summary
L2400146-003DMS
Units: mg/L (ppm)
Basis: NA
MRL
0.2
55
Spike CAS Relative
Spike Level Sample Spike Result Recovery Acceptance Percent Result
MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes
2.26 2.26 1.21 3.38 3.36 96 95 80-120 <1
(.)
21 Date:
~/I E¡/ð '-I
.
lent:
)roject Name:
t· ect Number:
pIe Matrix:
I
8nple Name:
. Code:
I ~est Notes:
I
lalyte
:ulfate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\pproved By
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QAlQC Report
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
MW-3
L2400146-003MS
Prep Analysis
Method Method
METHOD 300.0
Service Request: L2400146
Date Collected: 01/22/04
Date Received: 01/23/04
Date Extracted: NA
Date Analyzed: 01/23/04
Matrix Spike/Duplicate Matrix Spike Summary
L2400146-003DMS
Units: mg/L (ppm)
Basis: NA
MRL
2
55
Spike CAS Relative
Spike Level Sample Spike Result Recovery Acceptance Percent Result
MS DMS Result MS DMS MS DMS Limits Difference Notes
10.0 10.0 12.8 22.6 22.6 98 98 87-120 <1
22 Date:
~t?Io'l
, r
l0rt By:NKuperman
.-
I
lient :
oject Name:
roject Number:
~ample Matrix:
I
lple Name:
:'ab Code:
1st Notes:
I
E2C Remediation, LLC
Niagra Car Wash
NA
WATER
Laboratory Control Sample
L2400146-LCS
\.nalyte
lalinity as CaC03, Total
::hloride
I~ ductivity
rate as Nitrogen
ids, Total Dissolved (TDS)
;ulfate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iproved By
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QAlQC Report
Service Request:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed :
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Basis :
L2400146
NA
NA
NA
01/23/04
NA
CAS
Percent
Recovery
Analysis Percent Acceptance Result
Units Method True Value Result Recovery Limits Notes
mg/L (ppm) 310.1 39.6 42.7 108 85-115
mg/L (ppm) 300,0 10.0 9.58 96 90-110
uMHOS/cm 120.1 1410 1400 99 90-110
mg/L (ppm) 300.0 2.26 2.25 100 90-110
mg/L (ppm) 160.1 100 84.0 84 82-119
mg/L (ppm) 300.0 20.0 19.9 100 90-110
~5
23 Date:
?/;~/O y
, ,
l0rt By:NKuperman
_al.nllllb<Wto_ 12~on6
- -
-
-
,,"ai~ ~to"'F_ - ~
, I
.: (I'
IUJ
~
@
Client Name E2C Remediation, LLC 661.831.6906 fax 661.831.6234 Am:¡lysis Requested .'::) Sample Matrix
Project Name: ~ \ ~D\ a,{)- () A\l, \ ^d~~\~- § ::õ ~ ~
"" '"
8 1~, ::õ -:::> ~ Aqueous
Sf N N 8 Z 1.<Ì
Client Address: 5300 Woodmere Drive, Suite 105, Bakersfield, CA 93313 ::õ co co N ,J '-
lO S? 2 N ,~ (~ ~F-
::õ ::õ c1: c1: ::õ !:9.. ~~
~ N ~ If) N Cl.. Cl.. 8 l'! .6- I[)
~c(L G'f\lAf5r )t--\ g co ~ ~ ~ .)".) DSOil
Project Manager: 2 N III ~.(j
co C1J c1: <11 <11 co 0> ::õ V) ~
'-- \ ' , ,S Cl.. C1J ~ c !:>ìj ~~ 1$~
~ ->: (5 Qj ~ « III ß ~ ~~
Samp.ler Name:b~ Cl.. Cl.. ro ro Cl.. :- :::,0-
~Nts\61)...\ '"t\ L~\.; ÞE= t\\ \·\C~ . ~ w VI VI C C ~ ro N . D Acidified
i IU C1J <11 C1J III U !:9.. þl. '~1
..- l? is ~ 0> 0> <11 ~I~
x IU >- >- w X ~ ;~
w CD :I: :I: ëú x x ro "0 8~
!;: 0 0 IU W ',1)
I- Cl.. (l.. (5 I- III I- \)J VI':'
Sample Date Sample Time Sample Description and Container Type CD -<: I- I- > lO r- ¿ ...J CD ~ 'oJ Comments
~ t,~ ~IL:
\- ¿.'¿- \jq {) <6 S(J r\ w-~í Süa w-.\ ¡?LrA'Sí\ L x: >\ þìScLNS::I") l-tA)
1£,ûo..I""l fWJ"~ X +-
\_ L 2- -01 \ (J rl) ~\W·- L .c;L~)\.-v-. \ -fL'-\-sn C '" X X, y X. 5A-v\,\ ftv r'!'-'S\"
'_C00--~''''{ ~~fr:?T\ L .p( L¡61Æ;:D '.Ài~ r-;';: I
\ - 2"1.- òLf \ \ <Dr¡ r' LI\J ,- ~ c...CD ~-.I v-1\/'SIlC '1-- 'Á 'x '1\ N'(f\L'''j S-¡- 5 .
1(:,(.1 ') I",-l r/J\,.It\<::, TÙ
£\)
,...
BE.
-"J'C:1
Relinquished By:
Received By:
48 Hour
~ 5-Day_
Standard ~
Turnaround Time R
-
Date:
Date:
Relinquished By: . CIl ~ì~V¡f
Received BY~ lOC
Date:
Date: [ }9-3~J
0\)5D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I'· L
mtJals, Date, Time L..
I - f:::
.
SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM
Service Request No: L240 0 \4" Client: E 2 C
H DHL_,
Sample(s) delivered by: Client CAS Emp _ After ours
/
Golden State Overnight fed X UPS _ Other Courier .j
Chain of-Custody filled out accurately? Yes L~\ (See commen~:,~
Appropriate sample volume and containers? Y c:; -L ~o [) (See Comment~l
Sufficiellt labeling on container(s) ? Yes -L No __{See Comments)
Container(s) supplied by CAS? Yes I No ___iSee Comments)
Custody seales) intact? N/A1_ Yes No (See Comments)-
,
Trip Blank(s) received Yes No /
If Trip Blank was supplied by CAS, record serial # - TB-
Temperature of sample(s)/cooler" tf:,c Temp Blank? ':' <:'@ifdè" C;Qè)
Voafs Marked Preserved? Yes _ No _ Filled Properly? Yes _ No _ (Sèe Comments)
Preserved Bottles Requiring pH check(s)? 'yes L Appropriat~ Preservation? Yes / No_
RUSH Turn around time? Yes
N6tifi:e.d
Date & Time
Short Hold-Time Analysis (check all tlÚlt apply)
ASAP Res CL¡- D.O
24HR Flash Diss S2-
pH Odor- -
48IIR BOD- Color- Cr+6
Nitrite - ,MBAS- Nitrate .¡
0-P04 -
S~tt Sol -
72HR Vapors- Turbidity -
-
-
Notified N1N/£L
Ferrous Fe
OS '30
)(-
'. 25
IlnLô}f O<¡3,o
r:\sr form,,\~~_1.
.
I
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5090 Caterpillar Road
Redding, California 96003
(530) 244-5227 ph
(530) 244-4109 fax
.
.
A ~~~~:gal
~ Services I~C,
All Employee, Owned Company
Mr. Stuart Sigman
CAS/Canoga Park
6925 Canoga Avenue
Canoga Park, CA 91303-3102
Columbia Analytical Services Report
Niagra Car Wash
^ DC240007/DC007
L2400146
February 17, 2004
Submitted by:
~f-~
Karen Sellers
Project Manager/Client Services
The test results provided in this data package meet the
requirements of the NELAC Standards unless noted in the
case narrative report.
.
26
This report contains ~a total of 10 pages.
NELAP Accrediled
ACIL Seal of Excellence Award
00'(11
·
'I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAS Lab Reference No.: DC007
Level II
Page
No.
Cover Page.. ............ ..... ....... .............................,......... .................................... ........ ........ ...1
Table of Contents......... ........................ .......... .., ....... ... ....... ......... ............ ....................... ...2
Current CAS Redding Accreditation Programs .................................... ............................3
Sample Identification Cross-Reference ...........,......... ........................................... ............4
GENERAL CHEMISTRy........................................ ......... ............... .... ......................... ...5
Case narrative........................................................................................................ 6
Sample results......... ......... ................ ....... ........ .......................... ............... ........ .....7
Chain of Custody Documentation.... ............................. ........................... .................. ..... ..8
27
oon2
.
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Current CAS Redding Accreditation Programs
Federal and National Programs
· U.S Air Force, Air Force Center for Environmental ExceJlence (AFCEE)
Approved laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
· U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- MRD, HTRW Mandatory Center of Expertise
Validated for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
· Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC)
Approved laboratory for ~astewater and Hazardous Waste
State and Local Programs
· State of Arizona, DepartniêiitofHealth Services
Approved laboratory for Hazardous Waste
Lab 10# AZ0604
· State of Arkansas, Department of Environmental Quality
Approved laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab [0# None
· State of California, Department of Health Services, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP)
Approved laboratory for Drinking Water, Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab ID# 011 05CA
· State of Florida, Department of Health (NELAP)
Approved Environmental Testing Laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab 10# E87203
· State of Kansas, Department of Health and Environment (NELAP)
Approved laboratory for Hazardous Waste
Lab 10# E-l0323
· State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services (NELAP)
Approved laboratory for Drinking Water, Wastewater
Lab 10# 296202
· State of Massachusetts, Department of Environmental Protection
Approved laboratory for Drinking Water, Wastewater
Lab ID# M-'CA025
· State of Oregon, Department of Human Resources, Health Division (ORELAP)
Approved laboratory for Drinking Water, Wastewater, and Hazardous Waste
Lab fD# CA200004
· State of Utah, Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services (NELAP)
Approved laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab ID# QUALl
· State of Washington, Department of Ecology, Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Approved laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab ID# C037
· State of Wisconsin, Department of Ecology
Approved laboratory for Wastewater and Hazardous Waste
Lab 10# 999767340
28
00P3
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample ID Cross-reference Table
CAS
Lab Sample ID
FS = Field Sample
DC007001
DC007002
DC007003
FS M\.I-1
FS M\.I-2
FS M\.I-3
01/30/04 01/22/04 08 50 \.later
01/30/04 01/22/04 10 10 \.later
01/30/04 01/22/04 11 57 \.later
The above lab sample ID's and cross reference information apply to samples as received by the laboratory. Modifiers
to the lab sample fD may be added for internal tracking purposes. Any modified sample ID will be reflected in the
appropriate case narrative only. .
29
0004
.....:' .':' " ,'..: "'.'
, ""x<" ",",.:
'. <. ,.',..,.<.. ,.,'...
,'.',',.':,. '.'.,'"......
,;..;.;..".;'...,.
,.'.".,....:.,....:
.:)s .\,;'.' ,"i ¿";",
,': ,it.';"',,,,:,,; . . .......' .' ,,',. ..(i"
..'\...'.\',.;,
'.:s... .. '.
,·····:;'.':,;;:'>"i" .' ',', '"
·i· "'.' ,....,.....',':...:
" . ""..,..,.... ..'...,:...,
_ ,....'...::;.., "
',,'! ",' '" " ..·.,,';~i)r~
'..,. .,";.'''', .,..'.,..,. .... '.,' , ,:<".,;:;~'.'.,'
":,.' ',....." '.. ....'.... ...',..,.
',' ..,i,.",,·) ", ..,',,!, ',,"', : " ':. :fn 'i'/';,:;':'
·(i.:i;.,:.;.:..;".,.;::..."'....'. '........ .,; ',', .,\::;'...i\&; i".)':'ç\/ ....:;'.
..,·':.,.i:i. ii"'.:::, .: ..,..,"',,}, . ,..:
'···i·(f'ÍÍEMïS'FI1RY~ ,.i,·',~<;'f.;\;{··.r·".·~,;:'< "
·~8 .,c:.ç;L ::;",., ' 'lj_\1\~' .F:',
'.),." '.., , , .>'...."." \ '." ;:: ·S}'.:·>
.'..,:.....",'" <:'.:....... "'Y':"';""')':-,'i;",' is,,',':-
.,'" ',......, """':':,:," . ., .' '·.:.·v: ,,': , ' ,
,',"'.':, .' ,'...., " ".\,:;;." ,.,.,.\. ..S; "ii\:i .;\
,,':. .:, ,',i'" "'''''',\.\:<.".",>. "
." ,i,,;:.,,!;,; "iðF . ':È~\·~:¡~i:'~. ''> ,
....'.,...,.'.,".'....... :......'.,.:"...,....."..,..'.. ,... ..'..'....,:, i".···,'..., ,'j,... ,'. ...f., ,.,"....,.. ,. " . ,·\,~~%~¡,~;ii;;..~;¡;i;;;;t¡~f
'. . ". . . .'",,:. ..",., ',:'\ .',..:., ",.'i,"';:
.' ....,.'., ... .'. "..:.".' ..,i:.'.'}J...;...·"..i.,; '.. ,:., ··;':i:':",'}'..
.. ".' .,..,:,..'\';.-".,'/.,. .....,",..,...." ....,......,. . ...'.\.
.' '..... , . '. ,. " . ,.:". >: ....:,
.. ,.,. ",:" ....'"
'.,.. '...','.
...,'«,
"
)' .,
<.
'.,:....
':·l)~%)t·
.: ~".
.,
..
"
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Narrative
General Chemistry
CAS Lab Reference No./SDG.: DCOO?
I . RECEIPT
No exceptions were encountered unless a Sample Receipt Exception Report is
attached to the Chain-of-Custody included with this data package.
II. HOLDING TIMES
All holding times were met.
III. METHOD
The method used is cited in the corresponding Form I.
IV. PREPARATION
Sample preparation proceeded normally, if applicable.
V. ANALYSIS
A. Calibration: All acceptance criteria were met.
B.
Blanks: All acceptance criteria were met.
C.
Spikes: All acceptance criteria were met.
D.
Duplicates: All acceptance criteria were met.
E.
Laboratory Control Samples: All acceptance criteria were met.
F. Samples: Sample analyses proceeded normally.
G.
Other: No QA/QC was reported except client requested QA/QC.
Sample results are reported to the RL.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions
agreed to by the client and CAS, Inc., both technically and for completeness, except
for the conditions noted above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data
package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or designated person, as
verified by the following signature.
SIGNED:
~~v: /?J)bf
Ralph Poulsen
Operations Manager
DATE:
2j¡~/()1
.
Columbia
Analytical Services
5090 CaterpillarRd
Redding, CA 96003-1412
31
Phone No.: (530) 244-5227
Fax No.: (530) 244-4109
0006
·
I
Report of Analytical Results
I
I
Parameter: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Method: EPA351.3
Project Name: Niagra Car Wash
Date Received: 01/30/04 10:10 (Fri)
Reference No: DC007
I Lab Client
Sample ID Sample ID
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Result
Units
Reporting
Level
Date Date Sample
Collected Analyzed Matrix
(20802)
Columbia Analytical Services -- Redding
~MI
non'?
;þ,,¡¡ïi·'··\·"-:i
". - '.. ... -.;";'. , ' "': ....;,., '..':- ,'.:".. ,.,-.'
.,\\' '. '....... ". ". ,',.....', \.. '\' ""': ;.. '
.....',_.'....'., ".y" """..'" . '. '. ',' ,
.,...".,":',...'.",..,.'.<.," ,...'..". ......'.'.').:...': " .......'\ ¡I·t":.
'. '.' ,·i'.,:,,· .". ".'<' '.'
.. . .....' ·.e;;.ci,,'¡t'.....;¡··¡lij:i\j;:.. \i iiii:; ..' .'
....,.,.,','., ..... : . ··-·'i;?:.,···:- .": '.·-···-'.'ii.\..··-··:·· "-"';"'." .,.'.
.,..........,' ..' .' . ...... - ". ......' ......... ',..'........,...::.. ..,. ..'" ..",,:';:)
. - ". " ','...'.'
'.. . . ... ... . . ........ .. . ... ',,,}:10'
.,,' ,."';
" '.' ..-' "'.:.:: ,
. . . ··¡l.···.·;·'ii.,:in.·! ."
:'. . .',' ,...' :'...,i".,·, .._....' ,i.i"',··
,..,>- <,:;},·'..··C:·;.:. '.,.".,,:
< ,.."....;'.-.'>., ,'..,.:..;...,',-..' ..,',..:....'.,.,.-. .
"."'..".;","'.'" ·,.r'·;.i, ,.','.,' ,.'....',.',..' ,<i'
::".> ',,". '-"."" ..\," -' ""..,'..' : ,..'.."'.. ',,'.'., '/' ,
'., ,.'\ ", ..e"""",.;,',,,,,,,,,;,:
ÒD,V DOGUME' Ilûìt," ~i:œÎÔN,<:::''i_.
(,\0: ,,',' .,..'-.',' ,:;:.; .,,\~<::::;,:-;;:__;;{,'t':-y: "8',', ' ;:'y00";è,'::;.""
" ',:"""'''';''...'''''. '"<,, .--,,""" '," ',,'0::. \,)'.;,'.,..... '.,')
":i';: '<i.':) 3;""", "." ,.<. ' , ' .. ' ;c::ii;'.:¡\ii:;i ,:.
.1'-".""\"'; .,,--.,,'.' ;' .::-a., X;; " "--.ii ,
';,'..:.-.-...,',,'.\ ',',' '\,--"..,.,. , "--",.,, "
.. ' " ".\,;;.',..'::;' : ".' ,"
\; :; --.."".,-', ":.;'{:" :.
ii::'_':.-.-.::, .....' ",." ",' '.'.. ':
.'--'\.'¡i; ,.,;.,i>.it....,'" .,' '1i;:";;"·'.:';r "i.:.... '
.."',> ,...,'.. .; ',.) ......,,';!¡::.,. ." ,
,,'."","" " ,.."'...'....,..../,>" , '" " . . i,' ,'. . ",':
. "....; ; 'i:t:,Sci><',','':.'. ....',.;.,.,:.-,<,>,:'.,.:'.:.', ......,' .... ,";,'.:
... .·.X .... '.' '.', .... 'i>' ... ..ci.'C. '.. ... ····.';'TE:..,.;:... .,,'
, .' .... '.' .... ". ...,.' ~;j?;(ii,i~
.' " ··..·..i..·:
'. ,"
. .-.,
,"
.,
",
"
.,
,"
,<' .'"
:.",
- 61111Ck-.-'al -C~ .-.
G:::3Services 1Ne.
An Ðnpfoyee·OwnedCompany 6925 Canoga Ave.' Canoga Park, CA 91303' (818) 587-5550' 800-695-7222 x02' FAX (818) 587-5555
www.c8slab.com
_UMll)D~~B"ATMW ~LYWM RIlWUE....FCMII
PAGE -L OF I
-
-
-
Project Name Car Wa~ Iheel Number ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Include Method Number and Container Preservative)
AJ ,'a.. a ,.. ð... DC-DC> 7
Pro/ect Manager J" Report CC PRESERVATIVE I I I
·~+UO..-+- 5t'ç ñ ~øJ)
Company/Address U Ö Ö ~ Preservative Key
en .... $1 \:ì O. NONE
II: ~ ~'~ 1. HCL
UJ U ø ái Ö" 2. HNOa
z
~ .....Ö·.,!!!øÇ/)~ &. 3. H2S 4
::-,(/)0' ..-::; ~ CV
z -f!! 1J...:;j:ß 4J {!1 0 (j Æ> iV "- 4. NaOH
0 tJ ö rJ ~ ~ Ö ø ~& 5. Zn. Acetate
ü 6. MeOH
LL ~ Q¡ ~ ~~ ¡ ~~.s.~ Ö '$f:::
Phone # FAX# 0 7. NaHS04
II:
w (j~èf'::>~,,- (/) ~,~"- lJ ~& 8. Other -
CD
::;; ;;::tff ;;::tff ~..... ~Ö)c ;0 ~o ~ 9::;;;
Sample(s Signature Sample(s Printed Name ::>
z REMARKS/
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION
SAMPLING
CLIENT SAMPLE ID LABID DATE TIME MATRIX
rn w-I I ,'_...J. 1./ ol.s b w4J. ,. , y
m LLI - ;\. ~ I I r }()/O J y
rvJ uJ-3 .3 \~ IJ~ 1/ I V
f.'
.þ.
SPECIALlNSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS V.Þr- ~ \-1/1' ðtf TURNAROUND REQUIREMENTS REPORT REQUIREMENTS INVOICE INFORMATION
_ RUSH (SURCHARGES APPLY) _~ltsOnIY t :;''-/001 '1h
S0 h GO r1/-r C,Lcj !<cJd/()¡
~ PLEASE CIRCLE WORK DAYS _II. Results + QC Summaries PO#
(LCS, DUP, MS/MSD as required)
/' 2 3 4 _ III. Results + QC and Calibrallon BILL TO:
_ STANDARD ~ v..Jt.t.Á4 Summaries
REQUESTED FAX DATE _ IV. Data ~ Report with Raw Data
MRL ~ No
See QAPP 0 REQUESTED REPORT DATE POUMDUJ _Y~
z.,;1 'I Dol '-/6
SAMPLE RECEIPT: CONDITION/COOLER TEMP: CUSTODY SEALS: Y N Edata Yes -L"O,J Lab No:
/) ,r;,:SHED BY RECEIVED BY RELINQUISHED BY n J~IVEL RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY
l~~ ~
~r- "" ÞtJc:J-~ Signature Signature SigñãfUre?L" ~ "r ./ Signature Signature
Y"T 11'-
e 5nle~ Name ( .~ Printed Name 1Þ p:£ Printed Name printe~~//\ ß2 AA ì....ec. Printed Name Printed Name
'.
=r/~\l C\'~ Firm { Firm Firm F/"3~k ~ /~/O Firm Firm
IIMtEfTime . DatelTime DatelTime Datemme DatelTime DatelTime
Distribution: White - Return to Origlnalor; Yellow - Lab Copy: Pink, Retained by Client
SCOC·0603,15
.
I
I
I.
I'
I
1
I,
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
1
I
I,
I
I
IJ¡"Olumbia ,
. . " Analytical
Semces iDe
An Employee-Owned Company
5090 Caterpillar Road
Redding, CA 96003
. COOLER RECEIPT FORM
t0kJlI Jt'..fJ'
~/3?~¥ .
D I'! ~f'Ó7
Project/Client: . /\//A ~214 "(JM
,Batch No.: '
1. Cooler(s)/Sample(s) received on:
--
Shipped via: F-r<A £y
2.
Shipping Bill # (s): ¿.¡ 2 I :3.301 3900
Radiological Screening by:Q~~ '
, ' , '~
Custody seals on outside of cooler:
lfyes, where? Front ---Rear_ LtSide_ RtSide_
N/A
AC~
~ NO
Rejected
3.
Seals intact:
~.·NO
4.
, ¡yfNL~~LE PROCESSING
· Sample ProcessingfI'agging by: .6J. ~~ '
Cooler(s)/Sample(s) ;emp's: 4 oG..
(or) ,
Temp. Blank (if present): ."
Type of packing material (circle): lce~bble w~ Bubble Bags:Zip Locks Webbing
Other:
, .5~
6.
7.
Custody .papers properly filled out (ink, signed, dated, released, etc.)?
· ,Containers arrived in good 'condition (unbroken, lealdDg, etc.)?
Container labels complete (i.e. analysis, preservation, dateltime, etc.)? .
'~NO
@ NO
~ NO
@ NO
~ NO
(;) NO ,
.CAS Ð,
. @ NO N/A
8.
9.
.10.
Container labels and tags agree with custody papers?
11.
Correct types of containers used for the tests indicated?
a.)
Adequate sample received?
If not, note on Exception Report.
12.
Containers supplied by:
13.
. .
, ,
, Preserved containers received with the appropriate preservative?'
pH: ~~\'ž-5 ~ ¿?- ph (or) See pH log~
14. · VOA vials free of air bubbles? YES NO ð
15. Trip Blank preparation date: CAS . Other t!ßJ
16. Soil samples transferred to the freezer: Date: Time: ~
. See Exception Report for discrepancies. .
Rev.8/112002lds
35
nOlO
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proiect Number 1812BK03
APPENDIX D
First Quarter 2004 Purged Groundwater Disposal manifest
March 3. 2004
E2C Remediation
Appendix D
.
NON-HAZARDOUS
WASTE MANIFEST
1. Generator's US EPA ID No.
Generator's Name and Mailing Address
N Ifo.GJtA c.A-L \...>As ~
lì~J ~í'''''L l..D
:¿IrKbl6Fr~ CA-
Generator's Phone ( l..f..l ) Qjl!.¿.tfo(..
Transporter 1 ComeanyName
~ ). C y..¿.,.."{
Transporter 2 Company Name
......
US EPA ID Number A. Transporter's Phone
. C;. C¡. J t. (,./ ~ f' 3/ - C. '7 Clt,
us EPA ID Number B. Transporter's Phone
8.
Designated Facility Name and Site Address
f-¿....... £.0'1 f r-" I (;J .e......, ;é:........ T-+ L.
Z-ooo ~ ~ ß,ij ~ "'''' f:..
BA-.l.Ð~;:- r~, C--Þ- .
10. US EPA ID Number
C. Facility's Phone
(pi:, 1-- ¿;37- 1~52-
:A-.L-.6ð ð·2 .2.Ò.Y.C;
No. Type
13.
Total
Quanti
Waste Shipping Name and Description
12. Containers
rJ0r--- ("~A'-2..~Ov$ f.) fl..c",é. UA-'t~~
./.:1.3 t..(L
Additional Descriptions for Materials listed Above
E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above
, \z..~ 6 ,
'JOt- -J..\t'\2.-Ã:-.t..QO\JS F.J (.l.¿tE- wA--(' ~JL
P if) F( L€... ~ D1 r éLG -D~-OC&.\ '3
Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information
L-Ù t:ArIL P P L
fí:-Nt £:ft-c.. ~......¿.., t..c5 ~¡':'c:T -¿± I, L.. \ ~ S" Q 7 - D S ~ S
J-
18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials
T Printed/Typed Name
E
16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: lalians lor reporting proper disposal 01 Hazardous Wasle. .
'Printed/Type
R
A
19. Discrepancy Indication Space
20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as nated in Item 19.
Printed/Typed Name '\ \ \" \ \ ., £, .
J 0\''-' \ Ìi\L\!~';~' '-
Signature '~ . tk-',
i \ ' .,
V \ .-
i'-'
TRANSPORTER ;1
,/