HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 109-89RESOLUTION N0.109-89
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 334,
STINE NO. 6 ANNEXATION, GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STINE ROAD AND
PANA~!A LANE CONTIGUOUS TO THE BOUNDARY OF
THE CITY LIMITS. (WARD 6)
WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a
change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of
Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to
Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as
follows:
1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the
annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described
in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu-
tion as though fully set forth herein.
2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so
annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part
of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
3. That a plan for providing services within the
affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked
as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though
fully set forth herein.
4. That this proposal for change of organization, to
wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that
proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith.
5. That the reasons for the proposed change of organi-
zation are that the owners of the affected territory desire to
receive municipal services from the City of Bakersfield, and the
City desires to receive tax revenues for benefits given and to be
given to the territory proposed to be annexed.
6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning
upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3230 New Series, which
was adopted May 31, 1989, an Initial Study was conducted and it
was determined that the proposed project would not have a signif-
icant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was pre-
pared and posted on March 3, 1988.
7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa-
ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the
California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield
Resolution No. 107-86 have been duly followed and the Negative
Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and
adopted.
8. That the territory proposed for annexation as
described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant
to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 56046 of the Government Code.
9. That the names of the officers of the City of
Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of
Hearing, if any, are:
City Clerk
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
J. Dale Hawley
City Manager
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Arthur J. Saalfield
City Attorney
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten
(10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County
at 2700 "M" Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301.
.......... o0o .........
- 2 -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a
regular meeting thereof held on June 14, 1989 , by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ANTHONY, D~.MON D, SMITH, RAT'y, PETERSON, McD2F~MOT~' ,~ALVAGGIO
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Assistar[t CITY CLERK an~Z~k O~ficio Clerk of the
Council of th~ q~ity of Bakersfield
APPROVED
MAYOR of
June 14, 1989
the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED as to form:
i[js
Attachments
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
A ANEX 5
AP.STIN6.1
6/06/89
EXHIBIT "A"
STINE NO. 6
A parcel of land being a portion of the Northeast ~of Section 27, Township 30
South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. & M., County of Kern, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the north right of way line of the
Arvin-Edison Intake Canal and the west line of the east 30.00 feet of the
Northeast~of said Section 27, said point also being on the existing corporate
boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (1) South 00°34'22" West, along said west line, a distance of 1452.95
feet to a point on the South line of the Northeast~of said Section 27;
THENCE (2) North 89003'32" West, along said south line a distance of 570.01 feet
to the west line of the east 600.00 feet of said Northeast ~Section;
THENCE (3) North 00°34'22" East, along said west line, a distance of 1860.84
feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of the Arvin-Edison Intake
Canal;
THENCE following said Westerly canal right of way line for the following five
(5) courses:
THENCE (4) North 08°24'26" West, 171.82 feet;
THENCE (5) South 81°35'34" West, 84.00 Feet;
THENCE (6) North 08°24'26" West, 365.00 feet to the beginning of a 361.00 foot
radius curve, concave to the Southwest;
THENCE (7) Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 22°58'14"
an arc distance of 144.73 feet;
THENCE (8) North 31°22'40" West, 110.72 feet to a point on the south line of the
north 30.00 feet of the Northeast~of said Section 27, said point also being on
the existing corporate boundary of the City of Bakersfield;
THENCE (9) East and South along said existing corporate boundary to the Point of
Beginning.
Containing 36.37 Acres (more or less)
4:E.ASTINE6
RTY:wrn
ANNEXATIOt4 NO, ~34 RE~OLIJTION NO*
ANNEXATION OF
STINE No, 6
SERVICES
Planning
Parks and Recreation
Library
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Street
Construction
Maintenance
Sweeping
Lighting
Flood Control
Sewerage
Water
Other (REFUSE)
PLAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES
ANNEXATION NO. 334
(STINE NO. 6 )
Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided
Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed
(i.e., ,general tax rate or special
Upon Future Date assessment. )
Annexation ( specify )
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX ~VLINUES
UPON
COUNTY X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY N/A N/A
SHERIFF & HI~Y PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
No
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMEN~ CHANGE GElqERAL TAX REVENUES
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
NEW STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY
COUNTY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEEDED TO C
COUNTY X GENERAL TAX ~ES
NONE X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
X DEVELOPMENT GENERAL TAX REVENUES
C~&~qTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES
UPCN USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY
X DEVELOI~4ENT PRIVATE DEVELOPER
USER FEE/INITIAL COST BY
X PRIVATE DEVELOPER
X USER FEE
~ITY
4 :ANNEX334.1 EXHIBIT "C"
I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the
Location
Indicate location from which service
will be provided (i.e. nearest fire
station, library, etc.)
applicant city.
Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered
throught the City Police Department located at the s/w corner of Truxtun
Avenue and Eye Street about 8 miles north of the annexation.
Fire-Station 52 (County) is within 5 miles at South Union and Barton
Street. A future City Fire Station is proposed to be located within
the territory on Stine Road south of the Arvin-Edison Canal.
Parks and Recreation-Upon development of residential areas, the adopted
City Standard provides a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1000
population or in-lieu fees.
Library-N/A
Streets-The City Corporation yard on Truxtun Avenue west of Fwy. 99
will provide necessary facilities, personnel and services to accomodate
Public Works efforts. Maintenance and personnel will be dispatched from
the City Yard on a regular basis for preventative maintenance as needed.
Repair includes streets, constructed/maintenance, sweeping & lighting.
Sewer-Sewer service is available from the existing trunk sewer line in
Stine Road which connects to City Treatment Plant No. 3
Water-This area is partially within the service area of the city of
Bakersfield Ashe Water Division and the remainder will be accepted into
that system at time of development.
Other(Refuse)- When annexed and when development occurs, service will
be provided by the City by contract with a franchise collector or by
City forces.
Service Level Capacity
Indicate frequency and availability of '
service (i.e., street sweeping, response
time for emargency services, rec. programs,
etc.
24 hour patrol is provided in the i~nediate
vicinity of this annexation. First priority
response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less.
Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis
the annexation will not affect City/County join
service capability or response time.
Ail City parks are open to the public at reasonable
hours.
There will be no reduction in the range capacity of
the City to provide the necessary public works
services to this area. Services will be on a
regular basis and "as needed".
Adequate capacity exists.
Adequate capacity exists.
City refuse pickup is twice a week.
4 :ANNEX334.2 -2-
III.
What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the
existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emer-
gency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc. )? The
annexation of this territory will not affect the near term level or capa-
bility of the City to I)rovide needed services. Upon time of full
buildout of this territory, additional police officers will be required
to maintain the current level of city service. Street improvements
resultin(~ from development will increase the maintenance responsibility
of the city but will not affect the existing level of service.
IV.
Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve
affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would
city/distruct o_~r residents be responsible for financing? As development
occurs the developer provides and pays for major facilities and dedicates
them to the City. No upgrading or change in facilities will be required
in the territory for annexation.
Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject prop-
erty is zoned A (Exclusive Agriculture) in th~ County.
Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present
land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of
livestock on property, etc.) The portion of the territory lying north of
the Arvin-Edison Canal is prezoned City C-2 (C~,u~rcial Zone). The South
527 feet of the territory is prezoned City R-3 (Limited Multiple-Family
Ewelling Zone). The remaining central portion of the territory is prezoned
City R-1CH (One-Family Dwelling, Church Zone). The present co~nercial
agricultural land use is eliminated upon annexation of this territory.
4:ANNEX334.3 -3-
VIi.~
List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit
from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response
time, use of community facilities, etc. City Police should be able to
respond in a more timely matter than present County Sheriff and State
Highway Patrol services. The present City refuse collection rate is sub-
stantially lower than fees county residents now pay to independant
companies. No special assessment or charges for street sweeping, leaf
collection, school crossinq guards, street liqhting enerqy costs and fire
hydrants upon development of subject area.
VIII.
A.
Please provide the following information relative to city/district and
county taxes:
List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existin(~ tax rate in the area
equals 1..131819% of assessed market value. This represents the total
property tax rate. When annexed a designated percentage of the total
of the total property tax of the area will accrue to the City and
remainder to the County for providinq health care and social services.
(Rate as shown on 1988-89 County Auditor-Controller Tax Rate List)
Would effected area be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the
city/district: If so, explain. Yes, when annexed, the rate will be
increased to 1.136432% of assessed market value which equals the City
bond rate of 0.004613% and the existing property tax rate of 1.131819%.
How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value
of $50,000.00? If the house is used as the principal residence, the
$7000 home owners exemption leaves $43,000 for taxing purposes. The
City Bond rate of 0.004613% amounts to a difference of $1.99 more per
year on a house of this value.
4:ANNEX334.4 -4-