HomeMy WebLinkAboutMITIGATION (5)
-,'\
BNSF
.
MICK HARDIN
Manager Environmental Remediation
The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company
740 East Carnegie Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571
(909) 386-4081
January 29, 1999
01002724-61
Mr. Brian Pitts
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
RECE1f'TED
FEa 41g9g
BY:
..~-- -
Dear Mr. Pitts:
Enclosed for your review is copy of semi-annual groundwater monitoring report for July through
December, 1998, covering the former Navy Oil Company lease site near the corner of Union and·
Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California.
This report covers actions taken for operation and maintenance of the remaining portion of the
remediation system along with groundwater monitoring.
As covered in previous correspondence, we continue to recommend closure for this site, in view
ofthe risk-basked closure assessment forwarded'with my May 18, 1998 letter along with analysis
results indicating non-detect for MTB.
If questions arise during your review of the above information, please contact me at the above
telephone number.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Mick Hardin
Manager Environmental Remediation
"
..,
Enclosurè
cc: Mr. Howard Wines
City of Bakersfield Fire Department
Office of Environmental Services
1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Tim Lassen
TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
I:\AMIPRO\SB\MEH012810.SAM
BNSF
..,~.
. ,
.'
, "
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Environmental & Hazardous Materials
740 East Carnegie Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571
(909) 386-4081
Mr. Brian Pitts
Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
2700 M Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
July 24, 1997 'r..~ re ¡¡.-::--.--
File: 01002724-61 ¡OJ lC;; \G ~ D W~j¡r;j
I I l.s rÌ'¡
~¡¡;: .JUL 28 1997 l~j11
11..) ¡..
,-,I"
By====J
Dear Mr. Pitts:
Enclosed for your review is copy of semi-annual monitoring report for January through June,
1997, covering the former Navy Oil Company lease site near the corner of Union and
Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers monthly monitoring and
maintenance of the vapor extraction system and groundwater recovery system along with
groundwater monitoring.
As covered in previous correspondence, implementation of soil sampling program has been
scheduled to be completed in the next few weeks to further site closure.
If questions arise during your review of this report, please contact Mick Hardin at the above
telephone number.
Sincerely,
~JiJ~
Mick Hardin
Manager Environmental Remediation
Enclosure
cc Mr. Howard Wines
City of Bakersfield Fire Department
Office of Environmental Services
1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/enclosure)
Mr. Tim Lassen
TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92718
071811
,
{
"
'.
r
·
..'
'.
TIIC Environmental
Solutions/ne.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
Telephone 714-727-9336
Facsimile 714-727·7399
July 7, 1997
Project No. 92-247
Mr. Mick Hardin
Manager Environmental Remediation
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
740 East Carnegie Drive
San Bernardino, California 92408
Semiannual Monitoring Report for January through June 1997
Ground Water Recovery and Vapor Extraction System
Former Navy Oil Company Lease Site
Bakersfield. California
Dear Mr. Hardin:
This report summarizes the progress of the ground water recovery system and vapor
extraction system (VES) activities for January through June 1997 at the former Navy Oil
Company Lease Site in Bakersfield, California. Enclosed are three copies, one for your file,
one to forward to Mr. Brian Pitts at the Kern County Department of Environmental Health
Services (KCDEHS), and one to forward to Mr. Howard Wines at the City of Bakersfield
Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services. Key activities included monthly
monitoring and maintenance of the YES and ground water recovery system, and ground
water monitoring.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1. Figure 1 (attached) shows the ground water recovery system and the YES.
2. Fuel hydrocarbons are being extracted from the vadose zone through four vapor
extraction wells (E-l shallow [E-IS], E-l deep [E-ID] and E-2 and E-3). The fuel
vapors are destroyed in a thermal oxidizer permitted by the San Joaquin Valley Air
Pollution Control District (SJV APCD). Samples of vapor from each extraction well are
collected monthly to track the progress of the YES. The monthly monitoring indicates
that over the first half of 1997, the YES is extracting and burning on the average of
approximately 61 pounds of hydrocarbons per day.
3. Ground water impacted with low levels of dissolved phase fuel constituents (benzene,
toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene [BTXE]) is extracted from two ground water
monitoring wells (MW -4 and MW -7). The extracted ground water is pumped into a
holding tank and then discharged into the city industrial sewer under an Industrial
Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit issued by the City of Bakersfield Public Works
Department. The effluent is sampled semiannually for IWD Permit compliance and
parameter concentrations have consistently been below permit limitations.
Approximately 21,178 gallons of ground water were extracted and discharged from
January through June 1997.
<Ð
.
.
'.
TIIC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
Mr. Mick Hardin
July 7, 1997
Page 2
2.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING
1 . Semiannual sampling and gauging of seven monitoring wells onsite were completed on
June 18, 1997, and included the following activities:
· Measurement of depth to ground water.
· Measurement of thickness of free product, if present.
· Sampling and analysis of one sample from each monitoring well for
volatile fuel hydrocarbons (VFH), extractable fuel hydrocarbons (EFH),
and BTXE by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EP A)
Methods 8015M/8020.
Figure 1 shows the locations of the onsite monitoring wells.
VOLUME OF GROUND WATER RECOVERED
1. Table 1 provides a summary of the volume of ground water pumped from MW -4 and
MW -7 during the first half of 1997. Approximately 21,178 gallons of water were
discharged into the industrial sewer from January 2, 1997 through June 18, 1997.
To date, approximately 252,328 gallons of water have been recovered from ground
water pumping activities.
2. The flow meter on the inlet of the ground water storage tank was replaced on January 2,
1997.
GROUND WATER AND PRODUCT MEASUREMENTS
1. On June 18, 1997, depth to ground water and free product thickness were measured in
MW-2, -3, -5, -6, -7 and -8. Ground water levels were not measured in MW-1 and-4
since MW -4 is fitted with a recovery pump and MW -1 is within an area used by the City
of Bakersfield for stockpiling rubble and debris and was not accessible (i.e., covered
with rubble).
2. The recovery pump in Monitoring Well MW -7, was vandalized sometime in late
January 1997 or early February 1997 and has been out of service since that time (the
VES was also vandalized at that time and a police report was made). Monitoring on June
18, 1997 indicated that free product has accumulated in MW-7 since the pump has been
out-of-service. As an interim measure, the pump in MW-4 was removed and placed in
MW-7 on July 2, 1997.
3. Table 2 summarizes the historic water level and product thickness data. Other than
MW -7, free product was not detected in the monitoring wells, however an oily sheen
and a hydrocarbon odor were present in samples taken from MW-2 and -4. Generally,
ground water elevations were approximately 1 foot lower than the previous monitoring
event in December 1996.
@
.
.
.
"'''C Environmental
Solutions Inc.
Mr. Mick Hardin
July 7, 1997
Page 3
GROUNDWATEROUALITY
1. Ground water samples collected from MW-2, -3, -4, -5, -6 and -8 were analyzed for
BTXE by EPA Method 8020, and for EFH and VFH by EPA Method 8015M. The
results are summarized in Table 3. The laboratory reports and Chain-of-Custody
forms are included in Attachment A.
2. Analytical results for Monitoring Wells MW-3, -5, -6 and -8 show VFH and BTXE
concentrations have consistently remained below detection. A trace of EFH (0.65 mglL
and 0.54 mglL) were detected in MW-3 and MW-6.
3. Monitoring Wells MW-2 and -4 previously contained free product floating on the
ground water, but remediation activities have removed the free product and only an oily
sheen was observed in both of these three wells. Analytical results indicate that
dissolved phase EFH, VFH and BTXE concentrations in MW-2 and -4 have decreased
significantly over the last five quarterly monitoring events.
4. MW -7 was not sampled since free product was observed. As noted in Section 2.0, the
pump in MW -4 was removed and placed in MW -7 as an interim measure to remove
the product.
IWD PERMIT COMPLIANCE SAMPLING
1 . Samples of ground water discharged into the city sewer were collected on
June 18, 1997, and analyzed for the parameters required by the IWD Permit.
2. The analytical results indicate that the effluent parameters are within the IWD Permit
limitations. A copy of the laboratory reports were forwarded to the City of Bakersfield
Public Works Department and to the KCDEHS. A copy of the last monitoring report
submitted to the City of Bakersfield is included in Attachment B.
3.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM
1 . The YES is monitored monthly to ensure the equipment is operating properly and to
monitor the progress of remediation. Photoionization detector (PID) readings of
influent and effluent volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations indicated that the
thennal oxidizer was operating within the parameters of the SN APCD Permit limits.
PERFORMANCE TRACKING
1 . PID readings and flow rates from each of the four extraction wells are summarized in
Table 4. The PID readings are used for field-tracking of hydrocarbon levels in the
soil vapor.
@
TIIC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
·
Mr. Mick Hardin
July 7, 1997
Page 4
2. VES vent well vacuum measurements are summarized in Table 5. The results show
vacuum levels in the vent wells which indicate the YES is effective to the perimeter of
the soil plume.
3 . Vapor samples were collected from the four extraction wells on a montWy basis to track
the fuel hydrocarbon levels in the soil vapor and to also calculate the number of pounds
of hydrocarbons destroyed. The samples were analyzed by a State-certified laboratory,
and the results are shown in Table 6. The laboratory reports are included in
Attachment C.
The samples were tested for the following parameters:
· VFH: EPA Method 8015M
· BTXE: EP A Method 8020
·
Based on the VFH analysis results (see Table 6) and the flow from each well (see
Table 4), the pounds of VOCs destroyed each month since startup on
December 7, 1994 are shown below. These results indicate the pounds of VOCs
destroyed per day have decreased from 300 to 400 pounds per day during the first
months of startup to 44 pounds per day in June 1997. The supporting calculations are
shown in Attachment D.
·
VOCs DESTROYED VOCs DESTROYED
MON1H PER DAY DAYS IN SERVICE PER MONTH
(pounds) (pounds)
June 1997 44 12 528
May 1997 54 22 1,188
April 1997 59 23 1,357
March 1997 66 16 1,056
February 1997 66 22 1,452
January 1997 - - - -
December 1996 30 16 480
November 1996 112 9 1,008
October 1996 119 21 2,499
September 1996 123 13 1,599
August 1996 94 28 2,632
July 1996 107 31 3,317
June 1996 90 30 2,700
May 1996 159 31 4,929
April 1996 187 26 4,862
March 1996 116 30 3,480
February 1996 165 14 2,310
January 1996 165* 18 2,970
December 1995 165 23 3,795
November 1995 173 12 2,076
@
·
·
·
TIIC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
Mr. Mick Hardin
July 7, 1997
Page 5
VOCs DESTROYED VOCs DESTROYED
MONTH PER DAY DAYS IN SERVICE PER MONTH
(pounds) (pounds)
October 1995 93 8 744
September 1995 217 30 6,510
August 1995 95 4 380
July 1995 135 23 3,105
June 1995 148 30 4,440
May 1995 146 31 4,526
April 1995 78 26 2,028
March 1995 210 21 4,410
February 1995 328 21 6,888
January 1995 447 18 8,046
December 1994 211 17 3,587
Cumulative Total Since Startup (December 7, 1994): 88,902
* Average of December 1995 and February 1996.
4.0 SITE CLOSURE STATUS
1. A Plan for Verification Soil Sampling was submitted to the KCDEHS and verbally
approved. The plan includes drilling five soil borings and collection and analysis of soil
samples to evaluate cleanup of the vadose zone. These activities will be implemented
during the Third Quarter 1997 and the results will be transmitted under separate cover.
2. Ground water pumping activities will continue until product is removed from MW -7.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~_./
Tim C. Lassen, P.E.
Project Director
TCUJA:ks
Attachments
cc: Miro Knezevic
@
·
·
·
U
W
..J
en
~
(þJ.
Recyclable and made from recycled paper. ì6¿9
·
·
·
TABLE 1
1996 SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER DISCHARGE
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
1997 QUARTERS 1997
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Ground Water Discharged Into Sanitary 10,589 10,589 21,178
Sewer Under IWD Permit (gallon~)
Total through December 1996 231,150
Cumulative Total (1) 252,328
92-247 (7/2/97/dh)
(1) Cumulative effluent pumped from MW-4 and MW-7.
TRC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
.
TABLE 2
GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
.
TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECfED THICKNESS EQUIVALENT CORRECTED
MONITORING CASING DAlE WAlER(2) WATER LEVEL OF FREE WATER WATER LEVEL
WELL NO. ELEV A TION(I) (feet) ELEV ATION(I) PRODUcr THICKNESS(3 ELEV A TION(4)
(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet)
MW-l 399.98 June 1997 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
December 1996 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
June 1996 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
December 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
June 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
March 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
February 1992 100.09 299.89 0.00 0.00 299.89
January 1990 99.02 300.96 0.00 0.00 300.96
December 1988 99.67 300.31 0.00 0.00 300.31
MW-2 400.28 June 1997 102.92 297.36 0.00(6) 0.00 297.36
December 1996 99.59 300.69 0.00(6) 0.00 300.69
June 1996 100.55 299.73 0.00(6) 0.00 299.73
December 1995 100.13 300.15 0.00 0.00 300.15
June 1995 100.62 299.66 0.10 0.08 299.74
March 1995 99.88 300.40 0.00 0.00 300.40
February 1992 102.35 297.93 0.02 0.01 297.94
January 1990 101.62 298.66 0.58 0.44 299.10
December 1988 102.96 297.32 0.58 0.44 297.76
MW-3 401.40 June 1997 10 1.50 299.90 0.00 0.00 299.90
December 1996 100.57 300.83 0.00 0.00 300.83
June 1996 10 1.36 300.04 0.00 0.00 300.04
December 1995 101.03 300.37 0.00 0.00 300.37
June 1995 10 1.15 300.25 0.00 0.00 300.25
March 1995 100.20 300.70 0.00 0.00 300.70
February 1992 102.70 298.70 0.00 0.00 298.70
January 1990 102.08 299.32 0.00 0.00 299.32
December 1988 102.40 299.10 0.00 0.00 299.10
MW-4 398.20 June 1997 (8) (8) (6)(8) (6)(8) (8)
December 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8)
June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8)
December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8)
397.32(7) June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8)
March 1995 102.38 294.94 0.25 0.19 295.13
February 1992 105.25 292.95 0.25 0.19 292.76
January 1990 100.88 297.32 0.00 0.00 297.32
Page I of 2
(I)
(2)
(3)
(4)
. (5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey, referenced from benchmark No. 363
(elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union Avenue overpass.
Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well.
Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76. Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free
product multiplied by the specific gravity of product.
Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water level elevation.
MW-I could not be located. and was not sampled.
Gasoline odor and sheen on water suñace.
New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993.
MW -4 and MW -7 were not measured due to pump installations.
New elevation after casing cut down 0,89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993.
Several feet of free product was observed during purging activities in June 1997. Purging was discontinued and a
recovery pump was replaced in MW-7 and started on July 2.1997. me frwin.m.mootai
5~fJtions lnc.
.
.
.
TABLE 2
GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Page 2 of 2
TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECfED THICKNESS EQUIVALENT CORRECfED
MONITORING CASING DAlE WAlER(2) WATER LEVEL OF FREE WATER WATER LEVEL
WELL NO. ELEVATION(1) (feet) ELEV ATION(I) PRODUcr THICKNESS(3 ELEV A TION(4)
(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet)
MW-5 402.22 June 1997 102.73 299.49 0.00 0.00 299.49
December 1996 101.60 300.62 0.00 0.00 300.62
June 1996 102.54 299.68 0.00 0.00 299.68
December 1995 102.12 300.10 0.00 0.00 300.10
June 1995 102.36 299.86 0.00 0.00 299.86
March 1995 101.86 300.36 0.00 0.00 300.36
February 1992 104.15 298.07 0.00 0.00 298.07
January 1990 103.08 299.14 0.00 0.00 299.14
MW-6 401.56 June 1997 101.93 299.63 0.00 0.00 299.63
December 1996 100.70 300.86 0.00 0.00 300.86
June 1996 101.69 299.87 0.00 0.00 299.87
December 1995 101.23 300.33 0.00 0.00 300.33
June 1995 10 1.53 300.03 0.00 0.00 300.03
March 1995 101.01 300.55 0.00 0.00 300.55
March 1992 103.35 298.21 0.00 0.00 298.21
January 1990 102.38 299.18 0.00 0.00 299.18
MW-7 400.54 June 1997 (10) (10) (10) (10) (10)
December 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8)
June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8)
December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8)
June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8)
399.65(9) March 1995 101.80 297.85 0.00 0.00 297.85
February 1992 107.95 292.59 0.50 0.38 292.21
MW-8 402.25 June 1997 101.90 300.35 0.00 0.00 300.35
December 1996 100.32 301.93 0.00 0.00 301.93
June 1996 101.47 300.78 0.00 0.00 300.78
December 1995 100.88 301.37 0.00 0.00 301.37
June 1995 101.22 301.03 0.00 0.00 301.03
March 1995 100.69 301.56 0.00 0.00 301.56
March 1992 103.00 299.25 0.00 0.00 299.25
(l) Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey. referenced from benchmark No. 363
(elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union Avenue overpass.
(2) Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well.
(3) Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76. Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free
product multiplied by the specific gravity of product.
(4) Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water lêvel elevation.
(5) MW-l could not be located. and was not sampled.
(6) Gasoline odor and sheen on water surface.
(7) New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993.
(8) MW -4 and MW -7 were not measured due to pump installations.
(9) New elevation after casing cutdown 0.89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993.
(10) Several feet of free product was observed during purging activities in June 1997. Purging was discontinued and a recovery pump
was replaced in MW -7 and started on July 2, 1997.
92-247 (7/2I97/dh)
me
.
.
.
TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
.._ .....a. ",..._
EPA METHOD 8015M EPAMETHOD602
MONITORING DAlE FREE EFH VFH Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene
WElL PRODUcr
(mg/L)(I) (mg/L)(2) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
MW-2 6/18/97 -- 520 7.0 0.023 0.0009 0.076 0.045
12/19/96 Pink color, odor 0.018 3.3 0.025 0.005 0.052 0.125
6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA
12/14/95 -- 30 2.4 0.028 0.011 0.170 0.081
6/21/95 1.25 inches NA NA 0.38 0.29 0.45 0.1
3/15/95 -- 46 11 0.47 0.18 0.52 0.18
MW-3 6/18/97 -- 0.54 <0.05 <0.003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12/19/96 -- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/27/96 . -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
i;,',.. 6/18/97 -- 450 6.5 0.017 0.0008 0.13 0.060
,..1 12/19/96 Sheen & odor 0.69 81.0 0.067 <0.003 0.31 0.046
I....
1;' 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA
I 12/14/95 -- 22 5.0 0.042 0.016 0.76 0.190
6/21/95 Observed in NA NA 0.052 0.053 0.68 0.072
'01]"1]0".;.."".. pump discharge
3/15/95 3 inches 7,800 5,400 <1.5(3) <1.5(3) <2.5(3) <2.5(3)
MW-5 6/18/97 -- <0.5 <0.5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12/19/96 -- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
f2
p,
Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons.
Volatile Fqel Hydrocarbons.
Not Analyzed.
Less than detection limit shown.
-
EFH
VFH
EFH quantitated against a diesel standard (C7-C30).
VFH quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-C14).
Detection limits are elevated due to interferences from
the high concentrations ofEFH and VFH
(I)
(2
(3
Not Observed.
Shading indicates location of recovery pumps.
-
-
NA
<
.
.
.
TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
- - - - -- -
EPA MEfHOD 8015M EPAMEIHOD602
MONITORING DA1E FREE EFH VFH Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene
WEll.. PRODUcr
(mg/L)(l) (mg/L)(2) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
MW-6 6/18/97 -. 0.65 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12119/96 .- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/27/96 .- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12114/95 _. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/21/95 .. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
3/15/95 -. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/18/97 Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA
12119/96 Sheen & odor 0.0087 7.8 0.18 <0.003 0.14 0.26
6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA
;, 12114/95 72 4.9 0.22 <0.0003 0.210 0.054
..
6/21/95 Observed in NA NA 0.705 0.780 4.5 0.250
pump discharge
3/15/95 Sheen 4.0 4.0 0.52 0.057 0.29 0.073
MW-8 6/18/97 -. <0.05 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12119/96 -- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/27/96 .- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
12114/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
6/21/95 _. <0.5 <0.5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005
3/15/95 _. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 0.00083 <0.0005 , <0.0005
f2
2
p
(7/3/97/ks
92-247
EFH Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons.
VFH Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons.
NA = Not Analyzed.
< = Less than detection limit shown.
= Not Observed.
I = Shading indicates location of recovery pumps.
EFH quantitated against a diesel standard (C7-C30).
VFH quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-C14).
Detection limits are elevated due to interferences from
the high concentrations of EFH and VFH
(l
(2
(3
.
.
TABLE 4
EXTRACTION WELL
PID AND FLOW RATE
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
.
EXTRACTION WELL
DA1E E-15 E-lD E-2 E-3
Flow PID Flow PID Flow PID Flow PID
(cfrn) (cfrn) (coo) (cfrn)
6/18/97 75 248 75 412 65 158 45 228
5/29/97 75 303 75 312 65 166 35 335
4/24/97 75 230 75 335 65 142 35 265
3/26/97 75 NM 65 NM 65 NM 45 NM
'1126/97 75 730 65 780 65 580 45 380
1/26/97 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1'1129/96 75 520 65 520 65 520 45 260
11/26/96 75 520 65 520 65 520 45 130
10/31/96 75 650 65 650 65 390 45 520
9/30/96 65 85 60 40
8/30/96 65 NM 85 NM 60 NM '40 NM
7/19/96 65 181 85 514 62 162 40 231
6/28/96 65 176 80 281 62 118 43 151
5/2'1196 63 392 81 483 62 262 44 576
4/26/96 63 210 85 228 62 36 40 197
3/19/96 67 126 74 310 70 105 39 149
'1128/96 75 343 79 464 64 416 32 171
1/24/96 NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l
1 '1114/95 85 741 80 1,099 60 285 25 944
11/30/95 85 NM 80 NM 60 NM 25 NM
11/'1195 85 290 80 264 60 90 25 280
9/28/95 69 160 69 135 71 77 51 153
8/28/95 48 NM 57 NM 64 NM 51 NM
7/25/95 57 123 66 117 68 76 64 130
....... ...."...
(713/97/ks)
92-247
= Photoionization Detector.
= Cubic feet per minute.
= Not measured due to PID failure.
= Not measured due to thennal oxidizer failure.
PID
cfm
NM
NM-I
Notes:
I. Piping from each extraction well is equipped with a pitot tube to measure flow rate and a sample port to sample well gas.
2. F10w rates are calculated from differential pressure measurements recorded at the pitot tube in the piping from each extraction wel
3. PID readings are measured at the sample port in the piping from each extraction well.
.
.
.
TABLE 5
V ACUUM READING FROM VES VENT WELLS
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
VENT DATE AND VACUUM READING (inches of water)
WELL NO. 7/25/95 8/28/95 9/28/95 11/2/95 11/30/95 12/14/9~ 1/24/96 2/28/96 3/19/96 4/26/96 5/22/96 6/28/96 7/19/96 8/30/96 10/31/96 11/26/9~ 12/29/96 2/26/97 3/26/97 4/24/97 5/29/97 6/18/97
V-I NM 0.25 >1.0 0.54 0.78 >1.0 (I) 1.28 0.98 0.31(2) 1.35 1.49 0.77 0.80 1.25 0.87 1.10 0.35 0.70 1.11 0.76 0.77
V-2 NM 0.15 >1.0 0.36 0.54 >1.0 (I) 1.20 0.87 0.20(2) 1.30 1.42 0.64 .067 1.15 0.75 1.10 0.17 0.54 0.99 0.5 NM
.
V-3 NM 0.13 >1.0 0.30 0.44 0.9 (I) 1.20 0.82 0.06(2) 1.30 1.47 0.60 0.63 1.15 0.69 1.00 0.10 0.46 0.93 0.57 0.62
V4 NM 0.12 0.60 0.28 0.40 >1.0 (I) (3) 0.53 0.10(2) 0.70 0.80 0.40 0.40 NM 0.45 NM 0.10 NM 0.40 NM NM
V-5 NM 0.22 >1.0 0.44 0.64 >1.0 (I) 1.10 0.83 0.38(2) 1.15 1.23 0.64 0.68 1.10 0.72 0.95 0.26 0.57 0.90 0.63 0.67
V-6 NM 0.10 0.95 0.30 0.51 0.90 (I) 1.00 0.70 0.08(2) 1.05 1.10 0.49 0.50 0.90 0.58 0.85 0.18 0.47 0.74 0.47 0.47
V-7 NM 0.08 0.85 0.22 0.45 0.84 (I) 0.90 0.63 0.12(2) 1.00 1.02 0.44 0.45 0.85 0.53 0.85 0.13 0.37 0.68 0.41 0.46
V-8 NM 0.05 >1.0 0.24 0.49 >1.0 (I) 1.15 0.78 0.03(2) 1.20 1.39 0.50 0.57 1.05 0.63 0.90 0.10 0.41 0.91 0.50 0.52
Oxidizer
Manifold 52 45 46 27 30 30 (I) 34 34 36 33 35 32 33 35 35 35 30 30 30 30 30
Vacuum
(7/2/97/dh)
92-247
Thennal oxidizer was off and could not be restarted. No measurement taken.
Thennal oxidizer was found off. Measurements taken only shortly (1 to 3 hours) after !hennal oxidizer restarted.
Wen was covered by standing water.
(I)
(2)
(3)
= Not measured.
NM
.
.
.
TABLE 6
ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF VAPOR SAMPLES
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
EXTRACTION WELL
E-lS E-lD E-2 &3
DA1E Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv)
VFH Benzene Tsluene Total Ethyl- VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl- VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl- VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl-
Xylenes benzene Xylenes benzene Xylenes benzene Xylenes benzene
6/18/97 500 0.29 0.91 27 1.7 560 2.6 9.2 43 4.9 260 ND ND 4.7 0.66 780 1.5 5.7 39 3.9
5/29/97 660 0.61 1.8 32 2.1 790 2.5 10 34 4.6 330 ND 0.13 3.1 0.71 820 5.0 18 90 9.9
4/24/97 830 1.7 6.7 28 3.7 410 ND 0.24 3.7 0.91 700 0.67 2.1 29 2.5 870 2.8 12 35 5,0
3/26/97 880 1.5 3.6 97 7.3 1,100 5,6 19 100 12 93 ND 0.20 5.4 0.98 1,100 3.7 12 100 9.9
2/26/97 920 2.2 5.8 89 5.6 650 3,9 13 58 5.8 490 ND 0.13 11 1.6 1,100 3.6 10 82 6.6
2/5/97 850 0.96 2.6 60 4.3 1,700 5.2 20 84 12 320 ND 0.81 14 1.5 830 2.1 6.7 55 5.4
12/29/96 550 1.0 1.5 41 4.0 550 2.9 9.7 26 3.7 ND ND ND ND ND 210 0.56 2.4 26 2.9
11/26/96 1,500 1.4 2.4 77 8.3 1,800 4.9 21 100 15 1,400 3.4 12 97 12 160 ND ND 3.8 ND
10131/96 1.800 1.8 4.6 82 8.6 490 ND ND 4.2 ND 2,000 4.0 17 92 14 1,700 3.0 12 76 11
9/30/96 1,600 3.6 5.0 53 7.0 1,600 3.3 13 50 9.1 1,000 0.6 0.38 7.5 1.1 1,500 2.5 9.8 55 7.9
8/30/96 1,100 1.6 3.1 34 4.2 1.500 2.3 13 38 7.0 510 ND 0.23 5.4 1.1 1.100 1.5 7.2 31 4.5
7/19/96 1,500 3.2 11 110 15 1.500 7.7 36 130 13 590 ND 0.72 13 2.8 1,300 5.4 23 100 15
6/28/96 1,100 2.6 10 81 11 1.100 5.1 29 82 14 540 ND 0.9 14 2.6 1,600 4.6 25 99 16
5/22/96 2,100 4.8 17 110 15 2.500 7.6 45 130 23 290 ND 0.9 18 3.2 2.500 5.4 30 110 18
4/26/96 2,500 4.4 16 120 15 2,800 8.6 41 150 24 160 ND 0.8 4.0 0.9 3.500 5.3 27 107 20
3/19/96 1,000 4.0 15 79 12 2.000 7.5 41 120 21 580 ND 2.9 17 3.4 2.200 5.9 33 110 18
2/28/96 1,500 6.3 35 160 25 3,300 13 91 290 55 720 ND 6.3 53 10 2,200 9.6 61 200 39
12/14/95 2,000 6.7 30 140 19 3,100 17 150 380 65 460 ND ND 14 ND 1,900 12 77 240 37
11130/95 2,600 3.4 16 72 11 2,700 7.9 50 140 25 380 ND 1.9 6.5 ND 1,800 4.9 30 84 14
11/2/95 1,100 4.0 23 100 13 1,500 8.6 56 140 22 410 ND ND 13 ND 1,300 5.4 31 95 13
9/28/95 1.900 8.1 65 190 21 3.500 16 142 100 50 800 ND 4 14 6.5 4,000 12 120 92 40
8/28/95 1,300 5.8 36 64 13 1,200 4.6 31 64 9.7 1,200 5.1 36 75 11 1,400 6.5 44 86 13
7/25/95 1,600 7.9 55 130 17 1,300 6.6 56 100 14 500 0.9 11 38 4.9 2,800 10 100 200 26
(7/3/97Iks)
92-247
VFH = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons.
ND = Not detected.
ppmv = Parts per núllion by volume.
.
.
.
en
w
a:
:J
C)
u:
œ
Recyc!able and made from recycled paper. ì6S
~.
Ie
~e
~
...
~
a:
~
S Q MW-1
èi
::i
~
":'
N
01
FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY SITE
1433 UNION AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
/" ~\/ FOOTPRINT OF
f' / VADOSE ZONE PLUME
I ~
r'Î'E~Y:-~-'-'-'1 n
, I Q \ x I
x, tf V-fS MW-8 ~-7 , I
x \ \ x 0
! \ \! ~Ii
I \ \ BA~ER , POWER POLE
x E-1S V-2 TANK x GAS METER
I MW-6 't :1 E-1DG_G_e.
'\ E-E_E
x, \ Q--C-C-C I
I Wl-2 MW-5 G
x \ 0 CONTAINER
I ;' ~~~~ / ."
j \ 0 GATE ¿ GATE",~
L-xV-S ~\_~-4 L-x-rV-3.._..iG, ~~~
\ () BOUNDARY
\ E-2-... -
MW-7~
SEWER
CONNECTION
(IWD PERMI1)
" : /
'-.!..-/
GEO WESTERN WAREHOUSE BUilDING
(SINGLE STORY)
LEGEND
- --- SANTAFEPROPERTYBOlA'4DARY
-x-x- SECURlTYFENCE
-E- E - ELECTRICAL UNE FOR THERMAL OXIDIZER
-Q-Q-
NATURAL GAS UNE FOR
SUPPLEMENTAL FUEL
EXlST1NG CONDlfi FOR GROUND WATER
PUMPING OPERATION (BURIED 3 FEET BOS)
60
.
SCALE
o
I
-c-c-
- SS -:--- EXISTING 1.· DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER
Q MW-S MONITORING WEll
FIGURE 1
.V-7
SITE PLAN
- -e V-4
YES VENT WEll
25" ANGLE YES YENT WEll
YES EXTRACTION WEll
o E-1D
2· PVC WEll VAPOR PIPING
w
:>
z
w
>
<
Z
o
Z
:>
SANITARY
SEWER
MANHOLE
120 FEET
I
.
.
.
<C
(Ji:Y..
Recyclable and made from recycled paper, ì6S
'.
ATIACHMENT A
GROUND WATER LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CDSTODY FORMS
I.
.
Tn" Environmental
Sofutionslnc.
.. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
... .-
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
~~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
~vironmental Solutions, Inc. Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client project #: 94-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, Ca 92718
Analysis Method: EPA 5030 / 8015m / 8020
Sample Description: Water
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-19-97
Analyzed: 06-23-97
Reported: 06-27-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Surrogate
Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery
Number Number ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l TFT*
(ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%)
97060516 MW-5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 107
97060517 MW-2 7,000 23 0.91 45 76 112
97060518 MW-6 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 106
I .060519 MW-8 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 106
7060520 MW-4 6,500 17 0.83 60 130 108
97060521 MW-3 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 105
Detection Limit:
50
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
* alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~a~;
Laboratory Director
I .
AaAa
'tII!Iiiro....
--
~-
~-
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
.
Environmental Solutions, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
Client Project #: 94-247
Analysis Method: 3510j8015m
Sample Description: Water
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-18-97
Analyzed: 06-20-97
Reported: 06-27-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226
EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 8015m)
Laboratory Client Extractable
Sample Sample Hydrocarbons
Number Number (mg /1)
97060516 MW-5 N.D.
97060517 MW-2 520
97060518 MW-6 0.65
97060519 MW-8 N.D.
. 97060520 MW-4 450
97060520 MW-3 0.54
Detection Limit:
0.5
Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a diesel standard.
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C7 to C30. Analytes
reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
. ~~~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
e
I .
... -.
'Vœ..~
~-
--
----
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. .
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, S~ite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
ac DATA REPORT
Analysis: Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 8015m)
Date of Analysis: 06/20/97
Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100
Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226
Analyte
R1
(ppm)
SP
(ppm)
MS
(ppm)
MSD
(ppm)
PR1
%
PR2
%
RPD
%
Hydrocarbons
0.0
5.0
2.7
2.6
54
52
4
Definition of Terms:
R1
Results Of First Analysis
SP
Spike Concentration Added to Sample
eMS
Matrix Spike Results
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate Results
PR1
Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100
PR2
Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R 1) / SP} x 100
RPD
Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2
e ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~
MARK NOORANI
Laboratory Director
I .
... .-.
......
--
'OISa_
--
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
.
I
QC DATA REPORT
Analysis: EPA 5030 / 8015m / 8020
Date of Analysis: 06/23/97
Laboratory Sample No: 97060504
Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226
Benzene
R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD
(ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % %
0.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 108 108 0
0.0 5.0 5.1 5.0 102 100 2
0.0 5.0 504 5.4 108 108 0
0.0 250 240 220 96 88 9
Analyte
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Hydrocarbons
. Definition of Terms:
R1
Results Of First Analysis
SP
Spike Concentration Added to Sample
MS
Matrix Spike Results
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate Results
PR1
Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100
PR2
Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100
RPD
Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2
. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~~
MARK NOORANI
Laboratory Director
, ,.
\.
\'
\
0'"
,
j
~
"
,-.fþ
i
,
"e
..
.'
¡i
.....
Remarks
x'><.)(
I
. .
- -
Ship To: () r C, Y1) 0 (..ex, <., t A TV, (~J t.!.£.d page-1 .oc l ------:
Attn: S,r/VV1pJ,j ('r/YItf"ll 'ProjectName: ß^}\F~^)C,\NO,I
I
30') '/ 0'1/ ~ Project No.: c¡ Z - 2. 4 7
-r: 1 d ,''''' ('t) Site Locaûon: ßc, kr I <.. .¡11~ I J (¡.q
Date:, " 1-1..LJ~
ci. .
g ~
U Q Pres.
x H(l
"
"'" VI~
PI,~~ ~ --1 v. \ X
f )( I
~
)(
"I.~J 2
J 1- I
Sample Type
Date Time Water\ Solid !other
un/~~
luC;O 'f.
Depth
mu.J-5
(,()IAl- 7
YY't tAl - (,
~I.,·A
mIl - q
(y\I,J-'1
Tr",\~ C 01 !:Jc:'" ø
Tn 01'1 It ('......r.!\-,
Sample
No.
Boring/Wel
No.
'\
xl)(
¡
-'
,
I
\
Time
~
I
'9
Date
C./¡"!s7
(g ; / ~.... 'i'ì
(\ - -
~,O'A.~
T RL &,., A ",'A Company
rJ (.;<A ,....... _.A....f,.. 8 1.J -t-.
, . ,
"Rõð
Shipper's Signature:
Signature
( t"·'v'.....L "<'1<> Or, 1 ~
iI Å ....
- -
Total Number of Samples Shipped: .2
RelÙlQuished bv: Wf~~-
Received by: ~...\/~ VA
Relinquished by;
Received by:
Relinquished by:
[Sl ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
Received by:
Special InsttUcûons I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements:
~~~~
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creek. California 94598
[J ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1201 N. McDowell 8Dulevard
Petaluma, California 94954
The materlal(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remaln the
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion or the test work,
an remaining materlal(s) win be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a Ucensed facility.
\
.
.
.
In
ill
Recyclable and made from recycled paper, Z6S
.
ATTACHMENT B
MONITORING REPORT SENT TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFŒLD
.
.
Tile Environmental
Solutions Inc.
.
.
.
.,.IIC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
Telephone 714·727-9336
Facsimile 714-727-7399
July 3, 1997
Project No. 92-247
Ms. Lara Kimm
Wastewater Division
Public Works Department
City of Bakersfield
810 1 Ashe Road
Bakersfield, California 93313
Semiannual Monitoring Report
January through June 1997
Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
1433 Union Avenue
Bakersfield. California
Dear Ms. Kimm:
This letter summarizes the effluent monitoring results for January through June 1997 for the
discharge located at The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company site at
1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial
Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020.
Pursuant to the IWD Permit, headspace is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit
(LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a
semiannual basis and were collected on June 24, 1997. The monthly headspace
monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are
summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key
points are summarized below:
· The total volume of ground water discharged from January 1 to
June 24, 1997 was 21,178 gallons.
· The average discharge per day was 121 gallons (0.0001 million
gallons per day [mgd]), well below the permitted flow of
0.003 mgd.
· The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank ranged
from <0.01 percent to 0.03 percent.
· As shown in Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not
exceed the effluent limitations.
During the next six months (July through December 1997), monthly monitoring of the
headspace in the temporary holding tank will continue and the effluent will be sampled in
December 1997.
@
.
.
.
I
.,.IIC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
Ms. Lara Kimm
July 3, 1997
Page 2
Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has
been added:
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments
were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with
a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather
and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted
is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fme and imprisonment
for knowing violations."
If you have any questions or comments, please call us.
Sincerely,
~'/2. ~
Matthew R. Eaton, R.G.
Project Manager
MRFlJA:ks
Attachments
cc: Mick Hardin, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department
Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services
Tim C. Lassen" TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc.
@
.
.
-
.
TABLE 1
ANALYSIS RESULTS
IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020
1433 UNION A VENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PARAMETERS METHOD LIMITATIONS
7/28/94(1) 12130/94(1) 3/21195(1) 4/25/95(2) 6/2l/95(2) 9/25195(2) 12114/95(2) 6/28/96(2) 12119/96(2) 6/24/97(3)
Temperature e F) N/A 1500 F 92 62 67 - 84 87 60 84 63 85
Flashpoint e C) PMCC >140 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60' >60 >60 >60 >60 >60
Bio-oxygen Demand 405.1 * 0.5 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 87 9.0 30
(mg/L)
Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2,200 <4.0 <4.0 ' <4.0 <4.0 210 <4.0 300 <4.0
(mg/L)
Total Dissolved Solids 160.4 3,500 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 340 130 150
(mg/L)
pH (units) 150.1 6.0 - 12.0 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 7.2 7.1 6.6
Benzene (mgIL) 602 0.50 0.24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.001 <0.0003 0.16 0.19 0.033
Toluene (mg/L) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0.053 <0.0003 0.001 0.023 0.003 0.0043
Ethyl Benzene (mg/L) 602 7.92 0.0096 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.018 0.0092 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.027 0.27 0.089
Total Xylenes (mgIL) 602 * 0.29 0.42 0.0026 0.31 0.311 0.11 0.024 0.250 0.21 0.170
Oil and Grease 413.1 * 1.8 1.8 <2.0 5.8 12 5.9 60 79 2.0 250
LeOO 239.1 0.90 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.059 <0.1 <0.1
-- - --
(7/3/97/js)
92-247
TRC Environmental
Solunonslnc.
(1) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only.
(2) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7.
(3) Sample contain~ liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-4 only (MW-7 not pumping).
N/A = Not Analyzed.
PMCC = Pensky-Martins Closed Cup.
* = No limits, but monitoring required.
< = Analytical results are less than detection limits stated.
·
I .
.... .-.
..... .....
.....~
,...~
~-
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
Environmental Solutions, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
Client Project #: 94-247
Analysis Method: EPA 5030 / 8020
Sample Description: Water
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-19-97
Analyzed: 06-26-97
Reported: 06-27-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226
BTEX (EPA 8020)
Laboratory Client Ethyl Total surrogate
Sample Sample Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery
Number Number ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l TFT*
(ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%)
ti605230
Tank Grab
33
4.3
89
170
103
Detection Limit:
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
* alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~#~;
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
.
. .
... ...
..... .....
--
--
'--" .....,
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
Environmental solutions, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy all
Client project #: 94-247
Sample Description: water, Tank Composite
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-19-97
Analyzed: 06-25-97
Reported: 06-27-97
Laboratory Sample #: 97060522
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226
TDS
160.2
Detection Analysis
Limit Result
mg/l mg/l
0.1 N.D.
0.2 30
10 150
4.0 N.D.
Analyte
EPA
Method
Lead
6010
BOD
405.1
.
TSS
160.1
Analytes reported as N. D. were not present above the stated limit of
detection.
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
· ~8~~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
.
. .
.-. ..
..... .....
..... ,.....,
-.....
--
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
Environmental Solutions, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy all
Client project #: 94-247
Sample Description: Water, Tank Grab
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-19-97
Analyzed: 06-19/20-97
Reported: 06-27-97
Laboratory Sample #: 97060523
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226
Analyte
EPA
Method
Detection
Limit
Analysis
Result
oil & Grease 413.2 0.5 250 mg/l
pH 150.1 6.6
Flashpoint 1010 26°-60°C >60oC
. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of
detection.
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
.
~~an~~
Laboratory Director
e
I .
JI& ...
'UIiII!Io.....
--
--
..... ....
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
QC DATA REPORT
Analysis: Oil & Grease ( EPA 413.2 )
Date of Analysis: 06/25/97
Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100
Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226
Analyte
R1
(ppm)
SP
(ppm)
MS
(ppm)
MSD
(ppm)
PR1
%
PR2
%
RPD
%
Hydrocarbons
0.0
2.5
2.3
2.4
92
96
4
Definition of Terms:
R1
Results Of First Analysis
SP
eMS
Spike Concentration Added to Sample
Matrix Spike Results
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate Results
PR1
Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100
PR2
Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100
RPD
Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2
e ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~
M RK NOORANI
Laboratory Director
.
I .
Jm. ...
'tIII:A .....
--
--
--
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
QC DATA REPORT
Analysis: EPA 5030 / 8015m / 8020
Date of Analysis: 06/23/97
Laboratory Sample No: 97060504
Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226
Hydrocarbons
R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD
(ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % %
0.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 108 108 0
0.0 5.0 5.1 5.0 102 100 2
0.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 108 108 0
0.0 250 240 220 96 88 9
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
. Definition of Terms:
R1
Results Of First Analysis
SP
Spike Concentration Added to Sample
MS
Matrix Spike Results
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate Results
PR1
Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100
PR2
Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100
RPD
Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2
. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~H~
MARK NOORANI
Laboratory Director
.
. .
.-. ....
--.....
--
--
--
ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
QC DATA REPORT
Analysis: Inorganics
Date of Analysis: 06/20-25/97
Laboratory Sample No: 97060709 OCA 100
Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226
Analyte R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) % % %
Lead 0.00 1.00 1.02 0.95 102 95 7
TDS 1700 .1000 2600 2700 90 100 4
Definition of Terms:
R1
. SP
Results Of First Analysis
Spike Concentration Added to Sample
MS
Matrix Spike Results
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate Results
PR1
Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100
PR2
Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R 1) / SP} x 100
RPD
Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSDJ) x 100 x 2
. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~¿
MARK NOORANI
Laboratory Director
-
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
-
Site
Date: "" I. '..!ï1....-
~ .
)( -
--r- ~.
- .
- .
'. .
~.
,.
.
"
-
.
.
.'
\.
\
'~
.
j
~
'.
"".-
,
,
,
page.....1 _of. l
Project Name: &J<,F - A)c,\J'jO¡'¡
Project No.: ~ Z· 2. 4 7
Locaûon:. & Ýr> 1 < ;. I~ l,j (Jl1
- .
()rt:1nyo C.ðCI<,t AJ'!.:*c.11
~(I WI P '.J (' OY\ t"Þ' ,
30') 7 Dr) I ð.L-
í: g f :~ (' tJ
Ship To:
Ann:
..'
,
l}
....
I
',..
"
Remarks
)(..1')(
x
.
Date : . )lId Íõd;c.
1~¥'771 2.
Depth
Sample
No.
mIAJ-S
mlAl- L
mlAJ- <.,
ff)" I-A
r1"I J J- (.1
(V'\I 11- ~
TrU\'l C. 10':+ ~
TG ^ II t'.....rr.l'n
-
-
Boring/Wel
No.
\
,
p
..
.
I
,
Time
';g~2.t"\
Date
4,!J ~/s 7
0J .... / ~.... :)'ì
;
, I
- - -
.d LA.. ^" (\....... A u,..,J, - - -
Total Number of Samples Shipped: .i.. Shipper's Signature:
- - -
Signature Company
W, ^^^"'" (~.ð()~.Ir'- -
RelinQuished by: TI<..L é",., ....'-.__ ~,~~ ..6 ~.J I.-r",·
Received by: ~..."\/ A....-.. \r ^~......... Å ~ (') (....-A
Relinquished by;
Received by:
B ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTIONS,INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTIONS,INC.
21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
Relinquished by:
Received by:
.,
Speciallnstrucûons I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements:
~~. rYU.tt ~
\
¡
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creek, California 94598
-
¡
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC,
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard
Petaluma. California 94954
"
The materlal(s) listed are received for mvtlysls and/or treatability evaluation and remain the
property or the client and not Environmental Solutions, IDC. At the conclusion or the test work,
all remaining matertal(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed raclllty.
- .
\
-.
.
.'
o
?JiJ.
Recyclable and made from recycled paper. Zð<9
·
ATIACHMENT C
VAPOR SAMPLE LABORATORY RESULTS
I.
I,.
TIiC Environmental
Solutions Inc:.
.. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
.... ...
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
':~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
4Itvironmental Solutions, Inc. Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client Project #: 92-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9225
Sampled : 06-18-97
Received: 06-19-97
Analyzed: 06-20-97
Reported: 06-23-97
Sample Description: Air
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory
Sample
Number
Client
Sample
Number
Volatile Fuel
Hydrocarbons Benzene
Ethyl Total
Toluene Benzene xylenes
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
97060512 E-1S 500 0.29 0.91 1.7 27
97060513 E-1D 560 2.6 9.2 4.9 43
\ .60514 E-2 260 N.D. N.D. 0.66 4.7
97060515 E-3 780 1.5 5.7 3.9 39
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~#~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
,
-.
.
v
\'~
,
f
. ~'
.
t'
r
,¡
,
;
--'--
CHAIN OF CUSTÔDV.J!ECORD
~ -
:£
::i:..
:i:..
'I.
.
.
.
Page, l .of. {
Project Name: {jNS F ' III c¡ ~} 'I 0, 1
I
Project No.: ~ 2.. 24 7
Site Locaûon: 6", /C.PI '" Iï ~ I d r ¡1
Dale: <0 '-J...'L..J~
- -
""'To' ()<;~ìr ::~': A^^,<t.u¡
Attn: $" C r () I
3007 OOIAl
1t.\+/V1 C I'f
- -
-
Remarks
Q, .
e ~
8 t:) Pres.
t
Sample Type
Waterl Solid \other
A~('"
t
Sample I Depth~ate. Time
No.
. ~/LiI1.
1
BoringlWel
No.
£-/5
£:lJi
~
{3.-3
,
f
,
\,
..
ì._
},
,;.,.....
,
1
.......
\
I
\
)
-
,/,
,.
;;-.
.-
:",;
!
'.
"
!.....
Þ
!
--..
,
,
-
i
Time
~/.l..Oo."""
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
;
Date
G.//$h 7
, #
lll'" I C, - '7 1
....
\ I
INé.\
i ,\
1 ·,.ì
INC.
Company
f. AJ.,-r1
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
21 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92718
¡
J &: ~t-
r' '.,.J
~ ,--- .:.--
71ZL " r.., '(
^" /'1 ,..,'-,...........
..ð LA
,\
~
"
r~
'-..
.\"~.
"
.'-
...l
. ~-.;
.\IZI
.\
"'-.
:.-
Î"
".
j,)
,
..)
(jJ
".')
.....,
"Hi
¡.
-
Total Number of Samples Shipped: !i Shipper's Signature:
Signature
Relinquished by: )j~~^ ~çL~P..r,,¡r
Received by: """,,""-f <::-,.('\ \~t:..^._ ~ /
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Special Instructions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements:
~ ~,~~
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creek. California 94598
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard
Petaluma, California 94954
o
I
The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis and/or treatability evaJuatlon and remaJn the
property or the client and not Environmental Solutions, Ioe. At the conclusion or the test work,
all remaining materlal(s) will be retürned to the client ror eventuaJ dlsposaJ at a licensed radllty.
II ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
~~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
~ironmentaI SoIutions, Inc. CIient Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton CIient Project #: 92-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
AnaIysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020
Sample Description: Air
SampIed : 05-29-97
Received: 05-29-97
Analyzed: 05-30-97
Reported: 06-02-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9114
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory
SampIe
Number
CIient
SampIe
Number
VoIatiIe FueI
Hydrocarbons Benzene
EthyI TotaI
ToIuene Benzene XyIenes
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
97050597 E-1S 660 0.61 1.8 2.1 32
97050598 E-1D 790 2.5 10 4.6 34
.50599 E-2 330 N.D. 0.13 0.71 3.1
97050600 E-3 820 5.0 18 9.9 90
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
\,
,.
.
.
.
;
;
..
,\
'"
\'
'\.
\
. '
\
Remarks
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
'::L
::L.
:::i
"L
I
Page, Lof_ l
Project Name: ßJ\JSf' Nt::.'YO
Project No.:_ Cf <.. . L 4 7
Site Location: &C,~f~ Þ,~IJ rA
5'",-ª-.J.î1...-
I
Oro.Y"t;j too.,> t AII~
S>e;, ~ plt COn t.AO }
'3ŒfL. Of) 1.)../ -rt
Tosti'''' C A
Ship To:
Atln:
~ I ~jiJsamPle Containers
U 0 V~NO'~:f'
H 1 e4¡....
,
1-
I
Date:_
Sample Type
Water! ~olid !other
I-),',r
/
':Time
Date
s/lcJí1
Depth
Sample
No.
BoringlWel
No.
1=.-1'::>
~
E'<"
f-1.,
i
v
v
\.:....
.-~'.
,
\!....
Time
~'..JD
3~~ð
Date
5'1./1-"'/01
s-? q-j'l
~
Company
JQC f",^':'~."'^ \ I..Q^
OC-~
1'\
\f()
5, 'Shipper's Signature:
Signature
Jilt ""^- C\ _ ~ '^.r. \-\ At"
~ ...--J A-.. 'c--
Total Number of Samples Shipped:
Relinauished by:
Received bl=
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
SpeciallnstruclÏons I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements:
æ.. ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creelc, California 94598
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard
Petaluma, California 94954
rl\rJj. ~
The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the
property or the client and not Environmental Solutions, loe. At the conclusion ol the test work,
all remaining materlal(s) will be returned to the client ror eventual disposal at a licensed raclllty.
~~
11 ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
~~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
I ~ironmental Solutions, Inc. Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client Project #: 92-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020
Sample Description: Air
Sampled : 04-24-97
Received: 04-24-97
Analyzed: 04-25-97
Reported: 04-28-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 8971
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory
Sample
Number
Client
Sample
Number
Volatile Fuel
Hydrocarbons Benzene
Ethyl Total
Toluene Benzene Xylenes
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
97041286 E-3 830 1.7 6.7 3.7 28
97041287 E-2 410 N.D. 0.24 0.91 3.7
.41288 E-1S 700 0.67 2.1 2.5 29
97041289 E-1D 870 2.8 12 5.0 35
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated, against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~~~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
,
""\..
\'
~~
j"
\
""'-
\:...
."'#~.
.
.
.
)C
/
Page I of. 1
ProjectName: ßNSf= * A), ~
I
Project No.: 1) ?. - 2 4 7
Site Location: ß '" 1:." ~ ~ (/ J C A-
Date:, '-L/~~
O'Ci"'ø (' Oc¡)t A('\c-I,,t,~
~"""'pl1 ~tn"l _
'2.jJ(J7 0 Of d
J;).....¡.:..... (A-
Ship To:
Atm:
Remarks
Time
C',YO
'L'.yl....
Date
4/z..ii7i7
,-\'-L~ ..,q '¡
'/.
:!
y
.B. ~R""""" () -
~ ~
Company
ì PL Ënv ~ ('{n,.,.M~ ....-h, I Sol uti 0.... '\
C;Ci-\
Date Time
t . ±
-
.!J. Shipper's Signature:
Signature
Eh ~ ~ ~~/ur
~,",J (\0.,.... \c r.^,~ Lr
Depth
Total Number of Samples Shipped:
Relinauished by:
Received by:
Sample
No.
-
Boring/Wel
No.
t=-;
é-2
E-IS
f= -I n
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
I
Special Instructions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements:
1:21 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, Calüomia92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creek, Calüomia 94598
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard
Petaluma, Calüomia 94954
N)" tt E" tcr'r\
The materlal(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, loe. At the conclusion of the test work,
all remaining materfal(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility.
I\(!.~ulh qttt\
I! ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
~~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
4lavironmental Solutions, Inc. Client Project ID: ATSFRR-Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client Project #: 92-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020
Sample Description: Air
Sampled : 03-26-97
Received: 03-26-97
Analyzed: 03-28-97
Reported: 04-01-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 8756
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory
Sample
Number
Client
Sample
Number
Volatile Fuel
Hydrocarbons Benzene
Ethyl Total
Toluene Benzene Xylenes
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm)
97031005 E-1S 880 1.5 3.6 7.3 97
97031006 E-1D 1,100 5.6 19 12 100
.31007 E-2 93 N.D. 0.20 0.98 5.4
97031008 E-3 1,100 3.7 12 9.9 100
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~H~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
.
~,e
...,
,
,
.'..,.V-i..'
'\,......' \'.. .. ..~;
'~,.;:..~.:
'< \' \"
:
Time
/505"
S~Q4
,
Remarks
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Date
1he,!7Î
"3-2lÞ-'1'1
Company
t',, ~Jl:tL",,^
. .
- - -
Ship To: ()CG, ~fl Cör."t A..ar,I,,+~1 Page I of-L
Attn: ~c, ""'p" (' ( ,,,,t ,..c) \ _ Project Name: A TSF~R - A)NY 0, .
~cxn.: 001 oJ' _ Project No.: ~ 1-. '2. 4 'ì
ï~ ('f-\ - Site Location:~'" ~ I ,.t,; I J Ie ~_
- Date: 1/~~
- Depth I Date
BoringlWel Sample
No. No.
- ~
~-I <., -
';'-ID - :tj2lo ~
g-l. '3J?"14
1:-:) ~I?_¡ , ~,
1I~~~~lr
ï~L ~ ~
()(A--
Shipper's Signature:
Signature
It ,\). -J'o \n .,
--
Total Number of Samples Shipped: 1:1.
Relinauished by: 1:" D
Received by: Ç""C"I .ý It-n \::- r.....
-'
)
'.
G1 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
Relinquished by:
Received by: --:.'
Relinquished by:
-
Received by:
-
Special instructions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements: "
~~ ~~
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Walnut Creek, California 94598
o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard
Petaluma, California 94954
The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the
property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion or the test work,
all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility.
!! ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
~. 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
4Itvironmental Solutions, Inc. Client Project ID: BNSF Navy oil
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client Project #: 92-247
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020
Sample Description: Air
Sampled : 02-26-97
Received: 02-27-97
Analyzed: 02-28-97
Reported: 03-10-97
Laboratory Reference #: ESI 8603
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total
Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes
Number Number
( ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) ( ppm)
97020417 E-1S 920 2.2 5.8 5.6 89
97020418 E-1D 650 3.9 13 5.8 58
'020419 E-2 490 N.D. 0.13 1.6 11
7020420 E-3 1100 3.6 10 6.6 82
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~K~
Mark Noorani
Laboratory Director
.
.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
\
.
~,
\'
.
It
-
\
\
"'.
.>;.:~
,-
,
'.
i
.
Page, l .of. l
Project Name: ß/lJçç· AJ.-.vy O. i
Project No.: 12.. .2. 4 7 .
Site Locaûon: &.. J(.p I ~ flf 1,..1
Date: z.. 1...2.!:e..-122-
\
)
.
"
Remarks
.J>.
Containers
!œIPtes.
1ëJIt...
~1~1 ì~
8 e,:, Vol. No.
U I
J
,
I
ì
L-
Sample Type
Waterl Solid !other
.4.,',
.
Ship To: (\-.¡-r',^f)D ('('v, <.. t AI'It: I,
Atto: .$" _p/~ O"""f-.,.\
3fy)? Dn.. I 5U1+~ 537
7,-~ I'..d..-
- -
- -
Boring/Wel Sample Depth Date Time
No. No.
E.-IS 'l.~' liDS
fE-If), t IJI
-
&.:.2. I I
E·~ 112t)
I:...
c
Time
_ /53()
\3 '.S'h
r
Date
?.j ¿(j~ 1
'l.-~ -<)ì
TOÞI N"""'" of S_ Sbi""'" :i. S~""" -, i.:\ Q. T a... fJ U,r;¡ L
Signature Company
Relinauishedbv: ~ _:IT t.lr'>·/1... 7V2-<.- E"" I..;",^- j,J/..
Received by: ~ ~"" 6-<1.}¡, ~^ ~t:U OcA..
""~'
~
lL:.
~
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
21 Technology Drive ~ ' 1172 Pelican Bay Drive
Irvine, California 92718 ,-' ;"', Daytona Beach, Florida 32119
I I
\.1
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. D ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103
Petaluma, California 94954 Walnut Creek, California 94598
G1
D
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Relinquished by:
Received by:
SpeciallnstrUcûons I Shipment I Handlirig/ Storage Requirements:
The material(s) listed are receIved for analysis andlqr treatability evaluation and remain the
property oC the cllenfand not Environmental SoIutloos, Ioe. At the conclusion or the test work,
all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client Cor eventual disposal at a licensed Caclllty.
f" t" ""
rf)c.ff
"'I-li",
Re. ':>lJ/h
.. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC.
~~
~~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067
":": 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970
4Itvironmen~al Solu~ions, Inc. Clien~ Projec~ ID: Navy Oil Bakersfield
ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Clien~ Projec~ #:
21 Technology Dr.
Irvine, CA 92718
Analysis Me~hod: EPA 8015m / 8020
Sample Descrip~ion: Air
Labora~ory Reference #: ESI 8533
Sampled : 02-05-96
Received: 02-06-96
Analyzed: 02-07-96
Repor~ed: 02-10-97
VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020)
Labora~ory Clien~ Vola~ile Fuel E~hyl To~al
Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes
Number Number
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
97020059 E-1S 850 0.96 2.6 4.3 60
97020060 E-1D 1700 5.2 20 12 84
t020061 E-2 320 N.D. 0.81 1.5 14
020062 E-3 830 2.1 6.7 5.4 55
Detection Limit:
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a
Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14.
N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection.
gasoline standard.
Analytes reported as
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL
~.d~
Mark Noorani
Labora~ory Direc~or
,...'.. """"__ "0'"
ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL, INC.
3002 Dow, Suite 532
Tustin, CA 92680
(714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 1',R~QUU\~g,
D. i~ LOCATION:
ADDRESS:
E-a...s
e:.-~D
-
REMARKS/PRECAUTIONS
I
, ..
'..", .'
Analyt.eqUest and
Chain of Custody Record
,
\
~
~
x
'^
~
~
£-~
~-3
fc.
~,
Method of Shipment: ,~.....~ ~ ~ ~;/~~ ~
Received By: DatefTime: Reporting Format: (check)
NORMAL _ S.D. HMMD _
Received By: DatefTime:
-
Total No. of Samples: l-\.
ReI",qr~ ~,;:¡ -e1<õJt}
/' ,,--- 1~ r-r1 ~ ...
Relinquished By: DatefTime:
-
OTHER
up samples.
(check)
on ice
ick
p
RWQCB -
, L .,] 'ï I. Sample Integrity:
'30 I ntact
to
DatefTime:
1"1
1.' I
A disposal fee may be imposed if client fails
n f -, ,. ?' '1..() f) 1\,....
DatefTime:
:=:. ..,o';.J.
the property of the clien",~o is responsible for disposal
.r I fiP-4~ (À , I.,~ V\,~r,"
\
Received For Lab By:
,-. ~ ( \~"
, , .
\ '\ '\ \¡f:h-.
All samples remain
Relinquished By:
·.
.
I.'
c
< -I
ro..
Recyclable and made from recycled paper. ìðS
·
ATIACHMENTD
YES SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS
Ie
Ie
TRC Environmental
Solutions Inc.
I
i
1.
t
Pounds ofVOCs Destroyed By Thennal Oxidizer
¡Fonner Navy Oil Company Lease Site I
1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California
e)
ve ot January anOMarch 'f(4
328 Ibs per day .L
S. per aY¡
1
78 Lbs. per day _
1-
146 Lbs. per day,
r
s. per ay._
í
135 Lbs. per da{
I
95 Lbs. per day~
217 Lbs. per day}.
f
93 Lbs. per dayj
I
173 Lbs. per day
i
165 Lbs. per daYl
\
165 Lbs. per day(
\
s. per ay(
!.
187 Lbs. per day:,
+ ZIUJlT =
~da:
s. per da~
VOCd Apr95-;;
VOCd Aug. 91
95
95
VOCd July 95
VOCd May95
9
VOCd Nov. 9
VOCd Dec.
96
VOCd Feb.
240
June. Total=
57
per daYt
!IOILbs. per day!
1591Lbs
VOCd Apr.
OCd June 961
per da(
94 Los. per daYI
I
ayi
i
ayi
i
ay\
,
ay'
Lbs. perQãYf
i
ay;
)
ayj
ay,
!
ayl
I
44 Lbs. per day
¡
.
nK ~~Inc.
VOCd Sept
VOCd Oct
96
m-
260
rnr
1071Lbs.
VOCd July 96
VOCd Aug. 9t
VOCd Sept. 'It
VOCdUct. 961
~
~
'oed Feb5~
OCd t'eb26.
ãt.9'1
OCd ApnI.
VOCd May. 97
VOCd June. 97
I
j
\
i
t
25{
:rnr
:rnr
2šõ
Mar. 9'/=
~=
May 91=
jüjië:"97;
64
51
51
23
25
4õ
T
1BF
4U:T
44.õ
4õ
4!J
4!J
4U
'B"
45
45"
45
AS..
45"
45"
45"
4š
Hydrocarbons in Flow
+
IPH . t'low E-
100
248.6
176
August Total= 1220
Tõiãj;
uly. Tõtär=
Sept
(íci.'Total=
250
250
rnr
1!StJ
rnr
rnr
rnr
23T
rnr
250
23tJ
250
Step 2: Input Flow Rates from Weekly Monitoring
F
Flow Rate - CFM
E-lS E-lD E-2
Dec. 5. 1994 55 48 33
IUec. 3U. 19~ -sr ""'4r jJ'"'"
lAve. Uec. 1994 -sr ""'4r jJ'"'"
-
Jan. II. 1995 --rr õr """14
Ave. Jan 1995 --rr õr """14
t'eb. 2, 1995 """3'z- ""'3!r "7ï
Feb. 16. 1995 55 SO 28
Ave Feb. 1995 53 SO 28
-
Mar. 3.1995 87 74 36
Mar. 8.1995 80 7š- 32
Mar. 15, 1995 -W- -go 4!r
Mar. 21. 1995 -š3 -š3 '""38
Mar. 29.1995 93 94 43
Ave Mar. 1995 88 8S '""38
-
Apr. 13. 1995 74 70 35
Apr. 23. 1995 43 "'46 "50
Ave. Apr. 1995 58.5 58 42.5
-
May.4. 1995 32 '""š'l 4S
May. 10. 1995 34 58 42
May. 18. 1995 40 '""š'l 43
Ave. May 1995 35.3 SIT 4IT'
June. 21. 1995 '""š'l 63 69
-
July. 25. 1995 .,..,- ìiõ õr
-
Aug. 28, 1995 48 57 64
-
Sept. 28, 1995 69 69 "'"'71
Nov. 2. 1995 "l!3'""" -g¡r ~
-
Nov. 30. 1995 8S 80 ~
- - -
Uec. 14. 1995 --rr /'r ~
-
t'eb. 28. 1996 õI ì4 tr
- -
Mar 19.1996 7i7T 'mí "7!J:)
- -
Apr 26, 1996 7iT.1r 13T 'liT.1r
- -
1iT.S'" "Sl":3"" or:o
Jun. 28. 1996 liT" "BT" ìiIT"
- -
July. 1996 õ5'" l!) liT"
- - -
õ5'" l!) ìiIT"
- -
õ5'" l!) õ!í
- -
'"5' 0) õ5'"
- -
Nov. 1996 75 65 65
Uec. 1996 ~ 0) õ5'"
Feb. 5 1997 75 6š-' 65
Feb. 26 1997 8 65 ..65..
~ 75 53' õ5'"
A¡iñ["9í 75 53' õ5'"
~ 75 53' õ5'"
hñië.T997 7S 6s 6s
203.5
ZIT
158
Uec. Total =
Mar. Total =
Jãñ."TõiãI'" =
Total=
May.Total=
Feb Total =
Apr
E-3
3õ
"3tí
~
JT
JT
"24
25
25
54
35
44.5
35
'fi
"W
36
40
37
51
39
42
44
TPH Results from Quarterly Sampling
I I __
Effluent TPH- ppmv (EPA 8015) Bag Samples
E-1S E-lD rr- E-3
- - - -
5400 5700 860 650
9iõõ 3000 1800 9000
7iõ 3800 1600 4500
620 1600 44õ ï8õõ
26õõ Eõõ 2100 3700
2100 1300 1900 2000
1600 TIõõ 560 2800
TIõõ 'i2õõ 1200 1400
- - - -
1900 3500 800 4000
- - - -
1100 1500 410 1300
- - - -
2600 2700 380 1800
- - - -
2000 3100 460 1900
- - - -
1500 3300 720 2200
1000 2000 š8õ 22õõ
- - - -
2500 2800 160 3500
- - - -
2100 2500 290 2500
- - - -
1100 1100 S40 1600
- - - -
1500 1500 590 1300
- - - -
1100 1500 510 1100
- - - -
1600 1600 1000 1500
- - - -
1800 490 2000 1700
- - - -
1500 1800 1400 160
- - - -
S50 S50 5 210
- - - -
850 1700 320 830
- - - -
920 650 490 1100
- - - -
880 1100 93 11 00
- - - -
700 870 410 830
- - - -
660 790 330 820
- - - -
5SO 560 260 780
Input
1
Step
1994
Mar. 1995
Apr. 1995
May. 1995
July. 1996
August. 1996
Sept. 1996
Ocl. 1996
Nov. 1996
Dee. 1996
July. 1995
Aug. 1995
Sept. 1995
Oct. 1995
Nov. 1995
Dee, 1995
Feb. 1996
Miië.ï996
Apr. 1996
May. 1996
Dee.
.'
ePt.l1Ó~
[Jet. 199 -
Nov. 1996=
Uec. 1996=
Feb5. 97=
Step 3: Calculate Weighted Concentration (Wc) of
To Thermal Oxidizer
+
Nov. Total=
'\opr. TOI
~tal=
June Iotal=
July Iotal-
Aug. Iotal=
IJec.'Tõtái=
t'eb. Iotal=
Mar. I otal-
=
.