The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMITIGATION (6) BNSF ..~. .. MICK HARDIN Manager Environmental Remediation The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino. CA 92408-3571 (909) 386-4081 May 18, 1998 01002724-61 REc~ ·r:r\7ED MAY 2 2 1998 BY: - ~ -- Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed f?r your review and further handling is copy of Risk Base~ Closure Assessment cóvering former Navy Oil Company lease site near the corner of Union and Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. Your timely review and issuance of closure documentation would be greatly appreciated. If questions arise during your review of this report, please contact Mick Hardin at the above telephone number. Sincerely, ~J-j{~ Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure cc Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue I 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/o enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92718 I:\AMIPRO\SB\MEH051101.SAM BNSF ..~. .' MICK HARDIN Manager Environmental Remediation The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 (909) 386-4081 March 4, 1998 01002724-61 Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed for your review is copy of semi-annual monitoring report for July through Dec€mber 1997 covering the former Navy Oil Company lease site near the comer of Union and Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers monthly monitoring, maintenance of the vapor extraction system and groundwater recovery system along with groundwater monitoring. If questions arise during your review of this report, please contact Mick Hardin at the above telephone number. Sincerely, ~ ~tvLP , Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure cc Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen TRC Environmental Solutions I Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine I CA 92718 I:\AMIPRO\SB\MEH022509.SAM ." , , .. " :;' , :. TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Telephone 714·727·9336 Facsimile 714·727-7399 February 10, 1998 Project No. 92-247 Mr. Mick Hardin M~~~Ew~~emID~m~~oo The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Comp~y 740 East Carnegie Drive S~ Bernardino, CIDifornia 92408 SemiannuID Monitoring Report for July through December 1997 Ground Water Recovery and Vapor Extraction System Former Navy Oil Company Lease Site Bakersfield. CIDifornia Dear Mr. Hardin: This report summarizes the progress of the ground water recovery system ~d vapor extraction system (VES) activities for July through December 1997 at the former Navy Oil Comp~y Lease Site in Bakersfield, California. Enclosed are three copies, one for your file, one to forward to Mr. Brian Pitts at the Kern County Department of Environmental HeIDth Services (KCDEHS), and one to forward to Mr. Howard Wines at the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of EnvironmentID Services. Key activities included monthly monitoring ~d mainten~ce of the YES ~d ground water recovery system, ~d ground water monitoring. Based on the verification sampling results provided to the KCDEHS in November 1997, the YES unit was shutdown on January 31, 1998 and will be remòved from the site in February 1998. Pursuant to the KCDEHS letter dated J~uary 12, 1998, the extraction ~d vent wells will remain and a risk assessment is being completed to eVIDuate potentiID risks associated with air, soil and ground water exposure pathways based on future commercial/industrial site use. The results of the risk assessment will be forwarded under separate cover. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. Figure 1 (attached) shows the ground water recovery system and the YES. 2. The YES consists of: · Four vapor extraction wells (E-1 shIDlow [E-1S], E-1 deep [E-ID], . E-2 ~d E-3). · The fuel vapors are destroyed in a thermID oxidizer permitted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SN APCD). Samples of vapor from each extraction well are collected monthly to track the progress of the YES. The monthly monitoring indicates that over the second hIDf of 1997, the YES is extracting and burning on the average of approximately 42 pounds of hydrocarbons per day. @ i. . . THC Environmental Solutions Inc. Mr. Mick Hardin February 10, 1998 Page 2 3 . The ground water recovery system consists of: · Ground water pumping from one monitoring well, MW -7. (A pump was previously installed in Monitoring Well MW-4, but the pump was vandalized and destroyed. The pump will be replaced, if continued pumping is necessary.) · The extracted ground water is pumped into a holding tank and then discharged into the city industrial sewer under an Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit issued by the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department. The effluent is sampled semiannually for IWD Permit compliance and parameter concentrations have consistently been below permit limitations. Approximately 6,370 gallons of ground water were discharged from July through December 1997. 2.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING 1 . Semiannual sampling and gauging of seven monitoring wells onsite were completed on December 22, 1997, and included the following activities: · Measurement of depth to ground water. · Measurement of thickness of free product, if present. · Sampling and analysis of one sample from each monitoring well for volatile fuel hydrocarbons (VFH), extractable fuel hydrocarbons (EFH), and benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene (BTXE) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 8015M/8020. Figure 1 shows the locations of the monitoring wells. VOLUME OF GROUND WATER RECOVERED 1 . Table 1 provides a summary of the volume of ground water pumped from MW -7 during the second half of 1997. Approximately 6,370 gallons of water were discharged to the industrial sewer from July 1997 through December 1997. To date, approximately 258,698 gallons of water have been recovered from ground water pumping activities. GROUND WATER AND PRODUCT MEASUREMENTS 1 . On December 22, 1997, depth to ground water and free product thickness were measured in MW-2, -3, -5, -6, -7 and -8. Ground water levels were not measured in MW-l and-7 since MW -7 is fitted with a recovery pump and MW -1 is within an area used by the City of Bakersfield for stockpiling rubble and debris and is not accessible (i.e., covered with rubble). 2. The recovery pump in Monitoring Well MW -7, was vandalized in early 1997. As an interim measure, the pump in MW -4 was removed and placed in MW -7 on July 2, 1997. @ · · · TRC Environmental Solutions Inc. Mr. Mick Hardin February 10, 1998 Page 3 A replacement pump may be installed in MW -4 pending results of the risk assessment discussed on page 1 of this letter. 3. Table 2 summarizes the historic water level and product thickness data. Free product was not detected in the monitoring wells, however an oily sheen and a hydrocarbon odor were present in samples taken from MW-2 and -4. Generally, ground water elevations were approximately 1 foot higher than the previous monitoring event in June 1997. GROUND WATER OUALITY 1. Ground water samples collected from MW -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 and -8 were analyzed for BTXE by EPA Method 8020, and for EFH and VFH by EPA Method 8015M. The results are summarized in Table 3. The laboratory reports and Chain-of-Custody forms are included in Attachment A. 2. Analytical results for Monitoring Wells MW-3, -5, -6 and -8 show EFH, VFH and BTXE concentrations have consistently remained below detection. 3 . Monitoring Wells MW - 2 and -4 previously contained free product floating on the ground water, but remediation activities have removed the free product and only an oily sheen was observed in these wells. Analytical results indicate that dissolved phase EFH, VFH and BTXE concentrations in MW-2 and -4 have decreased significantly since the June 1997 monitoring event and have generally decreased over the last six monitoring events. 4. MW -7 is located at the leading edge of the impacted ground water and dissolved phase BTXE concentrations have decreased significantly to where only benzene concentrations are slightly above drinking water standards. IWD PERMIT COMPLIANCE SAMPLING 1 . Pursuant to a request by the City of Bakersfield Wastewater Division, the holding tank was cleaned out using a pressure washer and vacuum truck on November 25, 1997. The rinsate was transported as a nonhazardous waste and disposed at the McKittrick Waste Disposal Site in McKittrick, California. A copy of the nonhazardous waste manifest is included in Attachment B. 2. Samples of ground water discharged into the city sewer were collected on December 30, 1997, and analyzed for the parameters required by the IWD Permit. 3 . The analytical results indicate that the effluent parameters are within the IWD Permit limitations. A copy of the laboratory reports were forwarded to the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department and to the KCDEHS. A copy of the last monitoring report submitted to the City of Bakersfield is included in Attachment C. <Ð · · · .,.IIC Environmental Solutions Inc. Mr. Mick Hardin February 10, 1998 Page 4 3.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM 1. Based on the confirmation sampling results provided to the KCDEHS in November 1997 along with, the high cost of operating the YES and diminishing performance, the YES unit was shutdown on January 31, 1998 and is being removed in February 1998. Pursuant to the KCDEHS letter dated January 12, 1998, the extraction and vent wells will remain and a risk assessment is being completed to evaluate potential risks associated with air, soil and ground water pathways based on future commercial/industrial use. 2. The YES uptime was approximately 75 percent during July through November. However, due to weather-related shutdowns and mechanical failures, the YES was in service for one day in December. The YES was in service during January 1998. PERFORMANCE TRACKING 1. The YES is monitored montWy to ensure the equipment is operating properly and to monitor the progress of remediation. Photo ionization detector (PID) readings of influent and effluent volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations indicated that the thermal oxidizer was operating within the parameters of the SJV APCD pennit limits. 2. Pill readings and flow rates from each of the four extraction wells are summarized in Table 4. The Pill readings are used for field-tracking of hydrocarbon levels in the soil vapor. 3. YES vent well vacuum measurements are summarized in Table 5. The results show vacuum levels in the vent wells which indicate the YES is effective to the perimeter of the soil plume. 4. Vapor samples were collected from the four extraction wells on a montWy basis to track the fuel hydrocarbon levels in the soil vapor and to also calculate the number of pounds of hydrocarbons destroyed. The samples were analyzed by a State-certified laboratory, and the results are shown in Table 6. The laboratory reports are included in Attachment D. The samples were tested for the following parameters: · VFH: EPA Method 8015M · BTXE: EP A Method 8020 Based on the VFH analysis results (see Table 6) and the flow from each well (see Table 4), the pounds ofVOCs destroyed each month since startup on December 7, 1994 are shown below. These results indicate the pounds ofVOCs destroyed per day have decreased from 300 to 400 pounds per day during the first months of startup to 50 pounds per day in November 1997. The supporting calculations are shown in Attachment E. 5. Figure 2 shows YES efficiency and indicates the pounds of fuel destroyed per day have decreased to asymtotic levels and are no longer decreasing. @ TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. . Mr. Mick Hardin February 10, 1998 Page 5 . VOCs DESTROYED VOCs DESTROYED MON1H PER DAY DAYS IN-SERVICE PER MONTH (pounds) (pounds) December 1997 - - - November 1997 50 11 550 October 1997 50 23 1,150 September 1997 52 30 1,560 August, 1997 31 22 682 July 1997 31 28 868 June 1997 44 12 528 May 1997 54 22 1,188 April 1997 59 23 1,357 March 1997 66 16 1,056 February 1997 66 22 1,452 January 1997 - - - December 1996 30 16 480 November 1996 112 9 1,008 October 1996 119 21 2,499 September 1996 123 13 1,599 August 1996 94 28 . 2,632 Ju1y 1996 107 31 3,317 June 1996 90 30 2,700 May 1996 159 31 4,929 April 1996 187 26 4,862 March 1996 116 30 3,480 February 1996 165 14 2,310 January 1996 165* 18 2,970 December 1995 165 23 3,795 November 1995 173 12 2,076 October 1995 93 8 744 September 1995 217 30 6,510 August 1995 95 4 380 Ju1y 1995 135 23 3,105 June 1995 148 30 4,440 May 1995 146 31 4,526 Apri11995 78 26 2,028 March 1995 210 21 4,410 February 1995 328 21 6,888 January 1995 447 18 8,046 December 1994 211 17 3,587 Cumulative Total Since Startup (December 7, 1994): 93,712 . * Average of December 1995 and February 1996. (i) I , I :,. . . TRC Environmental Solutions/ne. Mr. Mick Hardin February 10, 1998 Page 6 4.0 SITE CLOSURE STATUS 1 . Verification sampling was conducted in August 1997, and in response to the results, the KCDEHS January 12, 1998 letter requested a risk assessment to evaluate potential risks associated with residual hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil and ground water prior to closure of the remediation systems. 2. A cursory analysis using the Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA) was performed using the residual levels of BTXE and total fuel in the soil and ground water, to calculate the baseline carcinogenic risk and hazard index for air, ground water and soil exposure pathways based on future commercial/industrial site use. The results indicate the RBCA approach could support a no further action recommendation for the soil which could allow removal of the YES. 3. Based upon preliminary RBCA results, the YES was shutdown on January 31, 1998 and will be removed in February 1998. The extraction and vent wells will remain until the KCDEHS approves RBCA and abandonment of the wells. 4. RBCA analyses, when completed, will determine whether ground water pumping and remediation need to be continued. If required, the ground water recovery system would be continued another six months (January through June 1998). Fuel concentrations in the ground water would then be reviewed against RBCA to determine if further operation of the ground water recovery system is necessary. 5. The RBCA results will be provided under separate cover. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, þ~æ~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MRElJA:js Enclosures . cc: Tim Lassen (i) :. '. . en w ..J m ¡:! OJ.. Recyclable and made from recycled paper, ìðS . . '. TABLE 1 1996 SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER DISCHARGE FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1997 1997 DESCRIPTION TOTAL January - June 1997 July - December 1997 Ground Water Discharged into Sanitary Sewer 21,178 6,370 27,548 Under IWD Permit (gallons) Cumulative Total(l) 258,698 92-247 (2/1 O/98/js) (1) Cumulative effluent pumped from MW-4 and MW-7. TIIC . . (I) (2) (3) (4) (5) . (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (II) TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Page I of 2 TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECfED THICKNESS EQUNALENT CORRECfED MONITORING CASING DATE WATER(2) WATER LEVEL OF FREE WATER WATER LEVEL WELL NO. ELEV A TlON(I) (feet) ELEV ATION(I) PRODUcr THICKNESS(3 ELEV ATION(4) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) MW-l 399.98 December 1997 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) June 1997 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) December 1996 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) June 1996 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) December 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) June 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) March 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) February 1992 100.09 299.89 0.00 0.00 299.89 January 1990 99.02 300.96 0.00 0.00 300.96 December 1988 99.67 300.31 0.00 0.00 300.31 MW-2 400.28 December 1997 100.32 299.96 0.00(6) 0.00 299.96 June 1997 102.92 297.36 0.00(6) 0.00 297.36 December 1996 99.59 300.69 0.00(6) 0.00 300.69 June 1996 100.5 5 299.73 0.00(6) 0.00 299.73 December 1995 100.13 300.15 0.00 0.00 300.15 June 1995 100.62 299.66 0.10 0.08 299.74 March 1995 99.88 300.40 0.00 0.00 300.40 February 1992 102.35 297.93 0.02 0.01 297.94 January 1990 101.62 298.66 0.58 0.44 299.10 December 1988 102.96 297.32 0.58 0.44 297.76 MW-3 401.40 December 1997 101.26 300.14 0.00 0.00 300.14 June 1997 101.50 299.90 0.00 0.00 299.90 December 1996 100.57 300.83 0.00 0.00 300.83 June 1996 10 1.36 300,04 0.00 0.00 300.04 December 1995 101.03 300.37 0.00 0,00 300.37 June 1995 10 1.15 300.25 0.00 0.00 300.25 March 1995 100.20 300.70 0.00 0.00 300.70 February 1992 102.70 298.70 0.00 0.00 298.70 January 1990 102.08 299.32 0.00 0.00 299.32 December 1988 102.40 299.10 0.00 0.00 299.10 MW-4 398.20 December 1997 102.38 295.82 0.00 0.00 295.82 June 1997 (8) (8) (6)(8) (6)(8) (8) December 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) 397.32(7) June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) . March 1995 102.38 294.94 0.25 0.19 295.13 February 1992 105.25 292.95 0.25 0.19 292.76 January 1990 100.88 297.32 0.00 0.00 297.32 Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey, referenced from benchmark No. 363 (elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union Avenue overpass, Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well. Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76. Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free product multiplied by the specific gravity of product Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water level elevation. MW - I could not be located. and was not sampled. Gasoline odor and sheen on water surface. New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. MW -4 and MW -7 were not measured due to pump installations. New elevation after casing cut down 0.89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. Free product was observed during purging activities in June 1997. Purging was discontinued and a recovery pump was replaced in MW-7 and started on July 2.1997. Not measured due to pumping. TIIC TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECfED THICKNESS EQUN ALENT CORRECfED MONITORING CASING DATE WATER(2) WA1ERLEVEL OF FREE W A1ER W A1ER LEVEL WELL NO. ELEVATION(I) (feet) ELEV A TION(I) PRODUcr THICKNESS(3 ELEV ATION(4) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) MW-5 402.22 December 1997 102.37 299.85 0.00 0.00 299.85 June 1997 102.73 299.49 0.00 0.00 299.49 December 1996 10 1.60 300.62 0.00 0.00 300.62 June 1996 102.54 299.68 0.00 0.00 299.68 December 1995 102.12 300.10 0.00 0.00 300.10 June 1995 102.36 299.86 0.00 0.00 299.86 March 1995 101.86 300.36 0.00 0.00 300.36 February 1992 104.15 298.07 0,00 0.00 298.07 January 1990 103.08 299.14 0.00 0.00 299.14 MW-6 401.56 December 1997 101.51 300.05 0.00 0.00 300.05 June 1997 101.93 299.63 0.00 0.00 299.63 December 1996 100.70 300,86 0.00 0.00 300.86 June 1996 101.69 299.87 0.00 0.00 299,87 December 1995 101.23 300.33 0.00 0.00 300.33 June 1995 101.53 300.03 0.00 0.00 300.03 March 1995 101.01 300.55 0,00 0.00 300.55 March 1992 103,35 298.21 0.00 0.00 298.21 January 1990 102.38 299.18 0.00 0.00 . 299.18 MW-7 400.54 December 1997 (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) June 1997 (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) December 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) 399.65(9) March 1995 101.80 297.85 0.00 0.00 297.85 February 1992 107.95 292.59 0.50 0.38 292.21 MW-8 402.25 December 1997 10 1.12 301.13 0.00 0.00 301.13 June 1997 101.90 300.35 0.00 0.00 300,35 December 1996 100.32 301.93 0.00 0.00 301.93 June 1996 101.47 300.78 0.00 0.00 300.78 December 1995 100.88 301.37 0.00 0.00 301.37 June 1995 101.22 301.03 0.00 0.00 301.03 March 1995 100.69 301.56 0.00 0.00 301.56 March 1992 103.00 299.25 0.00 0.00 299.25 TABLE 2 . GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Continued) . . (I) Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey. referenced from benchmark No. 363 (elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union Avenue overpass. (2) Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well. (3) Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76. Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free product multiplied by the specific gravity of product. (4) Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water level elevation. (5) MW-I could not be located. and was not sampled. (6) Gasoline odor and sheen on water suñace. (7) New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. (8) MW -4 and MW -7 were not measured due to pump installations. (9) New elevation after casing cut down 0.89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. (10) Free product was observed during purging activities in June 1997. Purging was discontinued and a recovery pump was replaced in MW-7 and started on July 2,1997. (11) Not measured due to pumping, Page 2 of 2 92-247 (2I5198/ks) TIIC . . TABLE 3 . GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORMER NA VY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ..... '" .. .....L_ EPAMEfHOD 80l5M EPA METIIOD 602 MONITORING DA1E FREE EFH YFH Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene WELL PRODUcr (mg/L)(I) (mgIL)(2) (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) MW-2 12/22/97 -- 23 22 0.024 0,0047 0.092 0.066 6/18/97 -- 520 7,0 0.023 0.0009 0.076 0.045 12/19/96 Pink color, odor 0.018 3.3 0.025 0.005 0.052 0.125 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/14/95 -- 30 2.4 0.028 0.011 0.170 0.081 6/21/95 1.25 inches NA NA 0.38 0.29 0.45 0.1 3/15/95 -- 46 11 0.47 0.18 0.52 0.18 MW-3 12/22/97 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/18/97 -- 0.54 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/19/96 -- <0,0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0,5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 MW-4 12/22/97 -- 9.2 7.4 0.0038 0.003 0.089 0.130 6/18/97 -- 450 6.5 0.017 0.0008 0.13 0.060 12/19/96 Sheen & odor 0.69 81.0 0.067 <0.003 0.31 0.046 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/14/95 -- 22 5.0 0.042 0.016 0.76 0.190 6/21/95 Observed in NA NA 0.052 0.053 0.68 0.072 pump discharge 3/15/95 3 inches 7,800 5,400 < 1.5(3) < 1.5(3) <2.5(3) <2.5(3) MW-5 12/22/97 -- <0.05 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/18/97 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/19/96 -- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 f2 p T'RC = Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons. = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons. = Not Analyzed. = Less than detection limit shown. = Not Observed. = Shading indicates location of recovery pumps. EFH VFH NA < -- EFH quantitated against a diesel standard (C7-C30). VFH quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-CI4). Detection limits are elevated due to interferences from the high concentrations of EFH and VFH. (1 (2 (3 . . . TABLE 3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Continued) & - - - _a _ EPA METHOD 80l5M EPA METHOD 602 MONITORING DA1E FREE EFH VFH Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene WELL PRODUcr (mg/L)(1) (mg/L)(2) (mg!L) (mg!L) (mg!L) (mg!L) MW-6 12/22/97 _. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6118/97 -. 0.65 <0,05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/19/96 -- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6127/96 .- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12114/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 3115/95 .- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12122197 .- 12 4.7 0.0086 0.0003 0.028 0.0097 6118/97 Yes NA NA NA NA NA NA 12119/96 Sheen & odor 0.0087 7.8 0.18 <0.003 0.14 0.26 6127196 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA 12114195 -- n 4.9 0.22 <0.0003 0.210 0.054 6/21195 Observed in NA NA 0.705 0.780 4.5 0.250 pump discharge 3/15195 Sheen 4.0 4.0 0.52 0.057 0.29 0.073 MW·8 12/22/97 -. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/18197 -- <0.05 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/19196 .- <0.0005 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6127196 .- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/14195 -. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6121195 .. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 3/15195 _. <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 0.00083 <0.0005 <0.0005 f2 2 p TAC (2I5/98/ks) 92-247 Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons. Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons. Not Analyzed. Less than detection limit shown. Not Observed. Shading indicates location of recovery pumps. - EFH VFH NA < ~.........."".'...'. L...:2lliJ EFH quantitated against a diesel standard (C7-C30). VFH quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-CI4), Detection limits are elevated due to interlerences from the high concentrations of EFH and VFH. (I (2 (3 . . TABLE 4 . EXTRACTION WELL PID AND FLOW RATE FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EXTRACfION WELL DAlE E-lS E-lD E-2 E-3 Flow Pill Flow Pill Flow Pill Flow Pill . (cfrn) (cfrn) (cfrn) (cfrn) 11/17/97 75 75 65 95 65 71 45 80 10/28/97 75 192 65 157 65 66 45 140 9/15/97 75 115 65 122 65 98 45 160 8/8/97 75 110 65 85 65 80 45 100 6/18/97 75 248 75 412 65 158 45 228 5/29/97 75 303 75 312 65 166 35 335 4/24/97 75 230 75 335 65 142 35 265 3/26/97 75 NM 65 NM 65 NM 45 NM 2/26/97 75 730 65 780 65 580 45 380 1/26/97 -- n -- n -- -- -- -- 12/29/96 75 520 65 520 65 520 45 260 11/26/96 75 520 65 520 65 520 45 130 10/31/96 75 650 65 650 65 390 45 520 9/30/96 65 85 60 40 8130/96 65 NM 85 NM 60 NM 40 NM 7/19/96 65 181 85 514 62 162 40 231 6/28/96 65 176 80 281 62 118 43 151 5/22/96 63 392 81 483 62 262 44 576 4/26/96 63 210 85 228 62 36 40 197 3/19/96 67 126 74 310 70 105 39 149 2/28/96 75 343 79 464 64 416 32 171 1/24/96 NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l 12/14/95 85 741 80 1,099 60 285 25 944 11/30/95 85 NM 80 NM 60 NM 25 NM 11/2/95 85 290 80 264 60 90 25 280 9/28/95 69 160 69 135 71 77 51 153 8/28/95 48 NM 57 NM 64 NM 51 NM 7/25/95 57 123 66 117 68 76 64 130 92-247 (2I3/98/cl = Photoionization Detector. = Cubic feet per minute. = Not measured due to Pill failure. = Not measured due to thermal oxidizer failure. Pill cfm NM NM- TIIC Notes: I. Piping from each extraction well is equipped with a pitot tube to measure flow rate and a sample port to sample welI gas. 2. Flow rates are calculated from differential pressure measurements recorded at the pi tot tube in the piping from each extraction we I 3. Pill readings are measured at the sample port in the piping from each extraction well. . . 5 V ACUUM READING FROM VES VENT WELLS FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TABLE (inches of water) DATE AND VACUUM READING VENT WELL NO. 11/17/97 10/28/97 - 0.83 9/15/97 8/8/97 5/29/9716/18/97 4/24/9~ 3/26/97 12/29/9612/26/97 11/26/96 10/31/96 7/19/961 8/30/96 2/28/961 3/19/961 4/26/961 5/22/961 6/28/96 1/24/96 12/14/96 11/30/95 11/2/95 9/28/95 8/28/95 7/25/95 0.90 68 1 0.32 0.77 0.76 11 1 0.70 0.35 1.10 0.87 25 1 0.80 0.77 1.49 1.35 0.31 (2) 0.98 28 1 (I) >1.0 0.78 0.54 >1.0 0.25 NM V-I 0.85 0.75 1.68 NM NM 0.5 0.99 0.54 0.17 1.10 0.75 15 1 .067 0.64 1.42 1.30 0.20(2) 0.87 20 1 (1) >1.0 0.54 0.36 >1.0 0.15 NM V-2 0.91 0,78 78 1 0.10 0.62 0.57 0.93 0.46 0.10 00 1 0.69 1.15 0.63 0.60 1.47 1.30 0.06(2) 0.82 20 1 ) ( 1 0.9 0.44 0.30 o >1 0.13 NM V-) 0.78 0.80 0.90 0.30 NM NM 0.40 NM 0.10 NM 0.45 NM 0.40 0.40 0.80 0.70 0.10(2) 0.53 (3) (1) >1.0 0.40 0.28 0.60 0.12 NM V-4 0.69 0.74 1.48 0.30 0.67 0.63 0.90 0.57 0.26 0.95 0.72 10 1 0.68 0.64 1.23 1.15 0.38(2) 0.83 1.10 (1) >1.0 0.64 0.44 >1.0 0.22 NM V-5 . 0.60 0.53 1.21 10 o. 0.47 0.47 0.74 0.47 0.18 0.85 0.58 0.90 0.50 0.49 1.10 1.05 0.08(2) 0.70 00 1 (1) 0.90 0.51 0.30 0.95 0.10 NM V-6 0.55 0.48 1.18 0.10 0.46 0.41 0.68 0.37 0.13 0.85 0.53 0.85 0.45 0.44 1.02 1.00 0.12(2) 0.63 0.90 (1) 0.84 0.45 0.22 0.85 0.08 NM V-7 0.62 0.60 1.64 0.10 0.52 0.50 0.91 0.41 0.10 0.90 0.63 1.05 0.57 0.50 39 1 1.20 0.03(2) 0.78 1.15 (1) >1.0 0.49 0.24 >1.0 0.05 NM V-8 Oxidizer Manifold Vacuum 30 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 33 32 35 33 36 34 34 (1) 30 30 27 46 45 52 (213198/cl) 92-247 after thennal oxidizer restarted. Thermal oxidizer was off and could not be restarted. No measurement taken. Thermal oxidizer was found off. Measurements taken only shortly (1 to 3 hours) Well was covered by standing water. (1) (2) (3) TIIC NM = Not measured. '. . . . TABLE 6 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF VAPOR SAMPLES FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA E-3 Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Total Ethy1- Xylenes benzene 19 21 20 19 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 3.9 9.9 5.0 9.9 6.6 5.4 2.9 Toluene 2.0 3.4 3.3 Benzene 39 90 35 100 82 55 26 3.8 3.5 5.7 18 12 12 10 6.7 2.4 ND 12 .4 2.1 0.56 ND 1.0 1.1 1.0 1 1 5 2 3.7 3.6 VFH 670 660 710 440 Ethyl- benzene ND 780 820 870 ,100 ,100 830 210 160 .700 ,500 14 13 40 13 26 92·247 (213/98/js) TIIC ND 1 7.9 4.5 15 16 18 20 18 39 37 1 1 76 55 31 100 99 110 107 110 200 240 84 95 92 9.8 7.2 23 25 30 27 33 61 77 30 31 120 44 100 3.0 2.5 1.5 5.4 4.6 5.4 5.3 5.9 9.6 12 4.9 5.4 12 I I 1,100 1,300 1.600 2.500 3.500 2.200 2,200 1,900 1,800 1,300 4,000 1.400 2,800 0.81 0.63 0.48 0.66 0.71 2.5 0.98 1.6 1.5 ND 12 14 1.1 1.1 2.8 2.6 3.2 0.9 3.4 10 ND ND ND 6.5 11 4.9 E-2 Analyses (ppmv) Total Xy1enes 2.4 EXTRACTION WELL Hydrocarbon Toluene ND 0.17 3.8 2.8 2.6 4.7 3.1 29 5.4 11 14 ND Benzene ND ND ND 0.13 2.1 0.20 0.13 0.81 ND 12 17 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.67 ND ND ND ND 97 92 7.5 5.4 13 14 18 4.0 17 53 14 6.5 13 14 0.38 0.23 0.72 0.9 0.9 0.8 ND 1.9 ND 4 36 11 4.1 4.2 1.9 4.9 4.6 0.91 12 5.8 12 3.7 15 ND 2.9 6.3 (ppmv) Total Xylenes 32 29 32 IS E-lD Hydrocarbon Analyses 3.4 4.0 0.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Sol 0.9 43 34 3.7 00 58 84 26 100 VFH 220 320 290 170 260 330 700 93 490 320 ND 1.400 2,000 1,000 510 590 540 290 160 580 720 460 380 410 800 1,200 500 Ethyl- benzene 3.7 Toluene 5.3 8.7 9.5 9.1 7.0 13 14 23 24 21 55 65 25 22 50 9.7 14 Benzene 2.1 3.0 2.6 1.8 4.2 50 38 130 82 130 ISO 120 140 140 100 64 00 290 380 4.4 9.2 10 0.24 19 13 20 9.7 21 ND ~ 13 36 29 45 41 41 91 Ethyl- benzene 0.88 1.6 1.1 1.8 1.7 2.1 E-1S Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Total Xylenes 13 16 15 2.6 2.5 ND 5.6 3.9 5.2 2.9 4.9 150 50 56 142 ND 3.3 2.3 7.7 5.1 7.6 8.6 7.5 13 17 7.9 8.6 16 4.6 6.6 VFH 910 770 740 410 560 790 410 1,100 650 1,700 550 1,800 490 1.600 1,500 1,500 1,100 2,500 2.800 2,000 3.300 3,100 2,700 1,500 3,500 1,200 1,300 DATE Toluene 3.7 7.3 5.6 4.3 4.0 8.3 8.6 7.0 4.2 15 11 15 15 12 25 19 11 13 21 13 17 20 27 32 28 97 89 60 41 0.85 0.90 1.0 2.0 0.91 1.8 6.7 3.6 5.8 2.6 1.5 2.4 4.6 5.0 3.1 11 10 17 16 15 35 30 16 23 65 36 55 Benzene 8.1 5.8 7.9 - Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons. Not detected. Parts per million by volume. 77 82 53 34 110 81 110 120 79 160 140 72 100 190 64 130 0.73 0.39 0.42 0.83 0.29 0.61 1.7 1.5 2.2 0.96 1.0 1.4 1.8 3.6 1.6 3.2 2.6 4.8 4.4 4.0 6.3 6.7 3.4 4.0 VFH 580 590 11117/97 10/28/97 9/15/97 8/8/97 6/18/97 690 430 500 660 830 880 920 850 5/29/97 4/24/97 3/26/97 2/26/97 2/5197 12/29/96 I 1/26/96 10/31/96 550 1.500 1,800 1,600 1,100 1,500 1,100 2.100 2.500 1.000 1.500 2,000 2,600 1,100 1,900 1.300 1,600 9/30/96 8130196 7/19/96 6/28196 5/22/96 4/26/96 3/19/96 2/28/96 12/14/95 I 1/30/95 1I/2/95 9/28/95 8/28/95 7/25/95 86 200 6.5 10 75 38 31 56 VFH = ND = ppmv = . . . -I en w a: ::J CJ ¡:¡: ro. Recyclable and made from recycled paper. ì6S ,. e' . I ~ I II 9 .... ~ ~ ~ MW-1 en ~ 01 ~ ...J ~ 19 en I /"-'\ r FOOTPRINT OF I ,.(. VADOSEZONEPWME f"+"E:v-iJ-~\-"-"-";' I I ,,' ! :i î f-6 _-6 ", j 11 i \ \ 1 MW· x, ' \ I POWER POLE ~ "\ E-15 V-2 \ ~GASMffiH I ~ e E-1D eLL MW-6, V-1 G-š--G- E-e x \ ~c--c-- I I , I MW-2 MW-5 G x J CONTAINER 1 " j ~T~~ I x G1 I GATE J GATE~+ x v-sj MW- / Lv-q XG !-x-\-x 4-x-x-r-x-x I \ \ E-2 I G MW-7~ v- I SEWER CONNECTION (IWD PERMIT) \ I I "..!........../ GEO WESTERN WAREHOUSE BUILDING (SINGLE STORY) LEGEND ---- BNSF PROPERTY BOUNDARY SECURITY ÆNCE -)(-)(- -E-E- ElECTRICAL LINE FOR THERMAL OXIDIZER G- NATURAL GAS LINE FOR - G- SUPPLEMENTAL RJEl 0-- EXISTING CONDUIT FOR GROUND WATER - C- PUMPING OPERATION (BURIED 3 ÆET BGS) - -S8- - EXISTING 14" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER ~ MW-5 MONITORING WELL o I 60 , SCALE eV-7 - -. V-4 VES VENT WElL 26' ANGLE VES VENT WELL SITE PLAN ' @ E-1D VES EXTRACTION WEll 2' PVC WELL VAPOR PIPING FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY SITE 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD. CALIFORNIA 1IIC FIGURE 1 W ::J Z W ~ Z o Z ::J SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 120 FEET ! . . . Figure 2 VOC Destruction Data 450 - - - - - 400 350 - ~ ~ '"' 300, QJ ~ ~ ð 250· 6 ~ _ 200,- QJ = ~ e ~ ~ o 150,- ..... ¡,) "Q - ~ ....... 100 ..,¡ .... 50 ~ Carbon Becomes Cost-Effective ............... - - . - - -- - --- - - -- 0 -+- + -+- + +--+- + I I I -+- - f -+---+ ~ If') If') If') If') If') If') \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 r- r- r- r- r- 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ U .0 ~ d bÕ ....; u .D ~ d bÕ ....; u -.D ~ d bÕ ....; Q) ~ 0.. :3 :3 u Q) ~ 0.. :3 :3 u Q) N 0.. :3 :3 u Q < ...... < 0 Q < ...... < 0 Q .D < ...... < 0 ~ Month .,.IIC · · · ~ ro. Recyclable and made from recycled paper, ì6S '. ATTACHMENT A GROUND WATER LABORATORY REPORTS . . I TIIC . I . ... ... 'W/m.--' -- -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 TRC/Environmental Solutions ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: 8015m/ 8020 Laboratory Reference #: ESI9840 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 12/23/97 12/24/97 12/29/97 12/30/97 Sample Description: Water VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015M/8020) Laboratory Sample Number Client Sample Number Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons ug/I (ppb) Benzene ug/I (ppb) Toluene ug/I (ppb) Ethyl Benzene ug/l (ppb) Total Xylenes ug/l (ppb) Surrogate Recovery TFT* (%) 97120550 MW-3 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 98 97120551 MW-5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 96 . 97120552 MW-8 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 97 97120553 MW-6 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 95 91120554 MW-4 7,400 3.8 3.0 130 89 98 97120555 MW-2 22,000 24 4.7 66 92 103 97120556 MW-7 4,700 8.6 N.D. 9.7 28 99 Detection Limit: 50 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detections. \} * alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene Orange coa~lytical ~ø# ~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . I . .... -. ..... ..... ~ -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 · TRC/Environmental Solutions ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 3510/8015m Sample Description: Water Sampled: 12/23/97 Recevied: 12/24/97 Analyzed: 12/29/97 Reported: 12/30/97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9840 EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 8015MJ Laboratory Sample Number Client Sample Number Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (mg/l) 97120550 MW-3 N.D. 97120551 MW-5 N.D. 97120552 MW-8 N.D. · 97120553 MW-6 N.D. 97120554 MW-4 9.2 97120555 MW-2 23 97120556 MW-7 12 Detection Limit: 0.5 Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a diesel standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C7 to C30. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. ORANGECO~CAL ~~. . Mark Noorani Laboratory Director · . I . ... ... ...,.., -- ..u:.._ -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. ' 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 5030 18015m 18020 Date of Analysis : 1 2/29/97 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9840 Analyte Benzene R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % 0.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 100 98 2 0.0 5.0 5.3 5.2 106 104 2 0.0 5.0 5.4 5.3 108 106 2 0.0 250 271 270 108 108 0 Toluene Ethylbenzene Hydrocarbons . Definition of Terms : R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 . ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director I . .-.. .- va.... -- 1ð!Ii'.;._ -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 8015m) Date of Analysis : 12/29/97 laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 laboratory Reference No : ESI 9840 Analyte SP (ppm) MS (ppml MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % R1 (ppm) Hydrocarbons 0.0 5.0 3.1 62 70 12 3.5 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director . . . '.' .:0" '-r'-' .. ., ¡. . ;:. ....... ," "" ..~ :,. . ....':'.. ,",.,-. ;.'. '·l:':~._ Ship To: . AtID: 1()()? OOIAJ -r~2L..... (' Þ'\ ,...::-~~~ .... ,...oy. _..." ".r.~:.. .;«~ '~', '4 '. ..' ~.,.....:.. ~'. '.... ·5···:"·· ,.' ..., --, . ..~.."J::..,;:,"'"~-.:..",;--.:.r-.... - . . -~ --. ·.··11......._.... -'.......~.lIô~....~~~...--.-.. ..-~... ..~...-.,~ '- ~, .. - ....._.._...__A ,> :~¥1 . .' .' ..' .~: < Remarks ,~ I or-.! . STODY RECORD Project Name: ß ¡vS f . ;\}., -/;} (). . c '1 I . Project No.: 1 'Z. . '2.. ï Siac Location: R.., Ke I ~ ~, ~ d C {1 Date: I ~ J~...5.::l...- Dale Tame ""/lJ.J<." 110 15 ý I V '1~(') v ~ v 'V V "- ~."'- ~ I Depth Boring/Wcll Sample No. No. I - TocaI Numb; or Samples Shipped: . '7 ::¡ Rècdved by: .., :. Relinquished _ Received .' '. _ Relinquished by: __ .. Reœived by: __ SpcciaIIÌI;'~ I ShipmcDt/llaDdlinJf Ston&C RequiremcoIs: ........ . ·~~,~.m~,~' Co 1" Time I (It:a.. ~ Dale /1 /2.4J~-¡ , . I Ii;'" ?_0-9."" Company .1J .......IA., 1- ïRl Of4\. (\ l'\L Shippcl'a Signature: . Signature '~.I~I' t~_·_ ~ -.J\ ~ .,..J ('~ \~ , ; .',0 .,:' " ,"',;" .,:....'~,8~~; The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis and/or treatability evaluadon and remain the ",: ...,'.:p:;: property or the client and not EnYlronmenlal SoIudons, lne. At the tonduslon 01 the test work, ;, ,.,' ~.;;,> all rem~lnIng materlal(s) wDl be returned to the client ror eventual disposal at a Ucensed radllty. ~~~·tt¡~~~~~~{iii~œt;/:,\~ ::;:~:",;,;.".~;,... 7: - ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTlONS,INe.· . 1172 Pelican Bay Drive Daytona Beach, Florida· 32119 18' ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. C 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 ,~ .. [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. , 1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 2815 MitcbcU Drive, Suite 103 Petaluma, California 94954 Walnut Creek, ÇIIifomi~;;?1.S.98 . ,.,.,~:~~' - ~!"'. ~-": . .' . m . - (ß::f. Recyclable and made from recycled paper, {6¢i) . ATIACHMENT B NONHAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST Ie . TIIC · tC P :;: :I: UJ Z W ~ >- :D :) µJ ÌJ.J -oJ ~ 2 :> :.) w ::0 :> :r: JJ :r: :> ~ :n ,. , :t I]: ... - J .) ~ .1- :¡ 1) NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST PROFILE NO. 12?S1110rK o PHOENIX 07390 1-800-458-3036 BAKERSFIELD 0 YOLO NOTE: \ This form to be in lieu of the Toxic Substance Controls hazardous waste manifest. To be used for NON-HAZARDOUS WASTES only. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: BURLINGTON/NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY rift) 134ST W-{qIJ~/~ DJ2, 5'IJA ~M.l)"Jf) I t.,A. &};1..'//)'; ¡~J3 UNION AV~ / FORMER NAVY OIL LEASE SITE Mailing Address: City I State I Zip: BAKERSFIELD) CA 111/1 tK.ltn¡¿VJN (' /3ÞJ5F) Phone No' 714/727-9336 Contact: MATT EATON (TRC) Signature; X ÁlUlt:J t'a.:f(f,- Date: NéV. I. ;z..~ I. J9'i7- , I THE GENERATOR CERTIFIES THAT THE WASTE AS DESCRIBED IS 100% NON-HAZARDOUS I GROUND WATER W/TRACE OF FUEL Waste Description : Generating Location: SAME Itfi3.? lh.)¡oN Ave. 81J1!.&-l!sriél-Q I {,/1 . NONE Handling Instructions: Quantity : / / t? tJ CONTAINER TYPE: [ -KJ GlS [ J BBl [ J YDS [JTONS [ J DUMP TRUCK [ J DRUMS [JSINS [JOTHER JTANK TRUCK DESIGNATED FACILITY: NAME: MCKITTRICK WASTE DISPOSAL ADDRESS: 56533 HIGHWAY 58 WEST CITY/STATElZIP: MCKITTRICK, CA 93251 805/762-7366 PHONE # : MP VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE MP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 3400 Manor Street Bakersfield, CA 93308 805/393-1151 TICKET# $/.7"494 TRACTITRLR# #?ð' ;- mnNo';~ ~ Signature: ,.' ~. Date fi - :::l s-cr 'T . P/U DATE: ~- ~ -- Job # Name: MCKITTRICK WASTE DISPOSAL Address: 56533 HIGHWAY 58 WEST Disposal Method : D landfill Other City/StatelZip : MCKITTRICK, CA 93251 Phone No : Discrepancy: 805/762-7366 Time: am pm Signature: I I Date: GENERATOR RF=TAIN . . .' () tJiJ.. Recyclable and made from recycled paper, 1:6<9 · ATTACHMENT C MONITORING REPORT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF BAKERSFIELD · · TIIC . . . 'rne Environmental Solutions Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine. California 92718 Telephone 714-727-9336 Facsimile 714-727·7399 January 12, 1998 Project No. 92-247 Ms. Lara Kimm Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 810 1 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Semiannual Monitoring Report July through December 1997 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California Dear Ms. Kimm: This letter summarizes the effluent monitoring results for July through December 1997 for the discharge located at The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD Permit, headspace is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit (LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis and were collected on December 30, 1997. A split sample for metals was also collected by a representative of your office at that time. The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below: · The total volume of ground water discharged from July 1 to December 30, 1997 was 6,370 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 35 gallons (0.000035 million gallons per day [mgd]), well below the permitted flow of 0.003 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank was < 0.01 percent each month (ranging from 1 to 10 ppmv). · As shown in Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the next six months (January through June 1998), monthly monitoring ofthe headspace in the temporary holding tank will continue and the effluent will be sampled in June 1998. @ '. . . "'''C Environmental Solutions Inc. Ms. Lara Kimm January 12, 1998 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." If you have any questions or comments, please call us. Sincerely, ~12.~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MREJJA:mc Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Tim C. Lassen, TRC @ . . . TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION A VENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETERS METHOD LIMITATIONS 7/28/94(1) 12130/94(1) 3/21195(1) 4/25/95(2) 6121195(2) 9/25/95(2) 12114/95(2) 6/28/96(2) 12119/96(2 6124/97(3) I2I30/97( 1 Temperature (0 F) N/A 1500 F 92 62 67 - 84 87 60 84 63 85 43 Flashpoint (0 C) PMCC >140 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Bio-oxygen Demand 405.1 * 0.5 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 87 9.0 30 27 (mg/L) Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2,200 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 210 <4.0 300 <4.0 12 (mg/L) Total Dissolved So1ids 160.4 3,500 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 340 130 150 260 (mg/L) pH (units) 150.1 6.0 - 12.0 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 7.2 7.1 6.6 6.4 Benzene (mg/L) 602 0.50 0.24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.001 <0.0003 0.16 0.19 0.033 0.0069 Toluene (mg/L) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0,053 <0.0003 0.001 0.023 0.003 0.0043 0.00096 Ethyl Benzene (mg/L) 602 7.92 0.0096 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.018 0.0092 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.027 0.27 0.089 0.0055 Total Xylenes (mgIL) 602 * 0.29 0.42 0.0026 0.31 O.311 0.11 0.024 0.250 0.21 0.170 0.014 Oil and Grease (mgIL) 413.1 * 1.8 1.8 <2.0 5.8 12 5.9 60 79 2.0 250 17 Lead (mg/L) 239.1 0.90 <0.01 <0,01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.059 <0.1 <0.1 <0.0005 2/98/ks) (1/ 92-247 1iquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. 1iquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7. liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-4 only (MW-7 not pumping). Sample contained Sample contained Sample contained (I) (2) (3) Not Analyzed. Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. No 1imits, but monitoring required. Analytical results are less than detection 1imits stated. - N/A PMCC * < . I . .-. .. ....... -- -- --- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 TRCIEnvironmental Solutions A TTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID : Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sample Description: Water, comp-1 Laboratory Sample #: 97120577 Laboratory Refemece #: TRC 9847 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 12/30/97 12/30/97 12/31,01/02 & /05 01/07/98 Analyte EPA Detection Analysis Method Limit Results Lead 7421 0.5 N.D. ugn TSS 160.2 4.0 12 mg/I . TDS 160.1 10 260 mg/I BOD 405.1 0.2 27 mgll Analytes reported as N.D.were not present above the stated limit of detection. . I . ... .. ......... -- ~...... -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, $uite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 . TRC/Environmental Solutions A TTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project 10 : Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sample Description: Water, grab-1 Laboratory Sample #: 97120577 Laboratory Refernece #: TRC 9847 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 12/30/97 12/30/97 12/30 12/31 01/05 01/07/98 Analyte EPA Detection Analysis Method Limit Results Oil and Greasè 413.2 0.5 17 mg/I, pH 150.1 6.4 Flashpoint 1010 26 0 60 >60C . Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Orange Coast Analytical ~¿ 0k~; Mark Noorani laboratory Director . · I . Ala.. 'UI'<I. ... .u-.._ ~........ ..,- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 ac DATA REPORT Analysis: TOTAL LEAD (EPA 7421) Date of Analysis: 01/05/98 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 9847 Analyte R1 (ppb) SP (ppb) MS (ppb) MSD (ppb) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % LEAD 0.0 20 20 21 100 105 5 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample · MS MSD Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R 1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R 1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSDI) x 100 x 2 · ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~: MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director .1 ~... ......... -- -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 . TRC/Environmental Solutions ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Client Project ID : Client Project #: Navy Oil 92-247 Sampled: 12/30/97 Sample Description: Water Received: 12/30/97 Analyzed: 01/06/98 Laboratory Reference #: TRC 9847 Reported: 01/07/98 BTEX (EPA 8020) Laboratory Client Ethyl Total Surrogate Sample Sample Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery Number Number ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I TFT* (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) 97120578 grab-1 6.9 0.96 5.5 14 106 .' Detection Limit: 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. * alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene Orange coas~ ' ~¿ . .." Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . . D . .m. ... 'Œ1I.... -- 'aoIIC- _ -- ORANGECOASTANALYnCAL,IN~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 OC DATA REPORT Analysis: BTEX (EPA 8020) Date of Analysis :01/06/98 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 1 00 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 9847 Benzene R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % 0.000 5.0 5.4 5.2 108 104 4 0.000 5.0 5.5 5.6 110 112 2 0.000 5.0 5.5 5.3 110 106 4 Analyte Toluene Ethylbenzene Definition of Terms: . R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Addød to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R 1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 . ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~N~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director I . IA~ 'Wœ.~ -- -- -- ORANGECOASTANALYnCAL,IN~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 ac DATA REPORT Analysis: Oil & Grease ( EPA 413.2 ) Date of Analysis : 12/31/97 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 9847 Analyte MS (ppm) RPD % MSD (ppm) SP (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % R1 (ppm) Hydrocarbons 2.6 2.5 104 100 0.0 2.5 4 Definition of Terms: R1 - Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD' Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R 1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director. . .' . . I . ... ... 'WI:!. .--. WIIiìI.. ..... -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 ac DATA REPORT ~ Analysis : Inorganics Date of Analysis: 01/02/98 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 9847 Analyte R1 (ppm) SP (ppm) MS (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % TDS 0.0 250 270 280 108 112 4 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP . MS MSD PR1 PR2 Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS + MSDI) x 100 x 2 . ORANGE, COAST ANALYTICAL ~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director ~;ì .,":~. . \ " ~~' "~'\~ " ......- \ .>~:-Jt iAA.:"-~~;C'~c (. ~ .~, . ì '\ " ...... '. ",...:..Þ~.... .... .. '\ ,þ - '. "'chge ' '. '~SJiip To: ~4¡()61' cFò¡-I:ST ~ ¿ ý77t: I or I CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Atm: Project Name: )JIIt/y CJ I L / Analysis I . ~.-... Project No.: 12 - '24 7 JilfIJll - ~ '-t,¡ ~ Site Location' -¡;.¡ ¡e:: ~/...SÇI [t. 0 t.::. *:ì.{'J' Date: /,2 I~ 9'7 < ~~ - l.~") ~ ~ Sample Type It ~ Sample Containers .~ f-j 'I\. Q- BoringIWcJl Sample Depth Date ~~'jJ~' ,/ ~ l!! No. No. Time Water Solid Other 8 C) Vol. No. Tvnc Pres. Remarks T Iv ../ ./ . - , I v' V" ./ V '. '~ '~ .. : , \ . . \ .' , " /' ~ Total Number or Samples Sbipped: ~ (A..tQ.~Sbippet'. Signaturc://(' //2 ~ ~A~, /' .A ".- SignalUte Company Date Time RelilVlU1shed ~./t ./'f;¥-~ ~~ 7/é<!.- 1,(7~7 A5.z.:r -. _. I I Received by: '. Relinquished by: Received by: " Relinquished by: , Received by: Ü\a' Hrl') ~ u '. 1 ~-~-q7 I 17: 'IS 19-1 '), !l:j7 J 5 ..1~ Spcciallnstructions I Sbipmcnt I HancDingl SbX8¡C Rcquircmcnts: ¿VIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, I;;~ o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. ' . ¡tf1IÞ~¡1rr t¡fß~ 21 Technology Drive ' 1172 Pelican Bay Drive Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 ..... .'- . I .-..' CENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTlONS,!Ne. C ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTlONS, INe. The materlal(s) listed are reœlmI ror analysis and/or treatabDlty ~uatlon and remain the 1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 281S Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 . property or the client and not Environmental SoIutlom, Inc:. At the 'èoncluslon or the test work, Peta1uma, California 94954 Walnut Creek, California 94,k all remalnl erlal(s) will be returned to the clIent ror eventual disposal at a Ucensed radllty. .;\ " ,. .....~~:~.. '-, , -,- I I. I. Ie c ro Recyclable and made from recycled paper, ì6S · ATTACHMENTD SOIL GAS LABORATORY REPORTS · · TIIC . 11 . sa. ... 'IIII!£.~ -- ---- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 TRC/Environmental Solutions ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: 8015m/8020 Sample Description: Air Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 11/17/97 11/18/97 11/18/97 11/18/97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9724 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015M/8020) Laboratory Sample Number Client Sample Number Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 97110119 E-1S 580 0.73 0.85 0.88 13 97110120 E-1D 910 2.1 5.3 3.7 32 . 97110121 E-2 220 N.D. N.D. N.D. 2.4 97110122 E-3 670 1.0 2.0 2.1 19 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detections. '. Orange Coast ~ tØ/~ ~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ':~~-,:'..~ ~ "~" , :\' ~"\. " ......- """" '," .....'........... . .':" ,.,,,,..,. ~.. (~:."'.t!.... ~.. '''''.:..",:~ . , . ..., _.~,.....-f __.~ -.~ ........, '__.010::" . ......... ;.::. ~~;::i;,,:..~ ·....r,..W·)·t.. '- :t:- J ~ Page, LorJ _ ProjectName:&tJSf . ~e-"",o,'l I Project No.· 97 :l.. 4 f') SiteLocatiOll: ß,; "-()I!..t-~P't'! Cf\ . I Date: I' '-..LJ+-I..s:.1.- Date Time -- !#2'~' t:J ~~ to, ~~":~ ~:;rl~^~ \ "1..001. pnuJ 7\.)... t ........ r A ~ Sample ;' No. Ship To: Atm: \. ·t~ Remarks Time o ~O.r ~'O ~. R ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, !Ne. D.. ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. 21 Technology Driw 1172 Pelican Bay Drive . IrviDc, California 92718 . ' Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 C ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, 1Ne. CENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlON8,INe. .1201 N. McDowell Boulevard . :' 2815 MjlcheJJ Drive, Suite 103 Petaluma, California 94954 ' Walnut Creek, California 94598 . - . Date 1//1'//17 , . , ,..... t Sf' -«;''") - Company - - ~ ïfLr _ I"'Jr_A. ,I TotaIN~ofSampIeaShipped: ,ï:j Shippel'lSi & Slgnatu RellnauIshed bY: , .. t\ ) I _ ~ ..~ ItA A)--~ = Rccdvedbr,~ .~ ~\~r..^ ~...~~ _ , ...... Relinquished by: \ . _ ReceIved by: . ' _ ReliDquished by:.. _ ReCeived by:.. - Speciallnstructioui I Shipment I HàndIfnsI StoraiC RcquiremeII . ~ ~,,~. r{\.Ji\~ . hmaterlal(s)listed are reœlmI for. lysis and/or treatabDfty nataadon and remain tile , property of the dfent and not En'taI Solutions, II At the conclusion fA the test work, $:. all remalnfng ma I) wDl beo ~ dlen~r ~ntual disposal at a Uœnsed fa?Dty. ~~~~~~~;'-F:,;··f.·~·:·:~·,.',:~· . .. '.,-. '..- rri;> f\ ~ " Depth Boring/Wcll No. J:""S ; é-tO' .. 1..' r· ". Ë·\ . .1 ~.. W1J,..... ~- ~ ~ ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. . 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020 sample Description: Air, Sampled : 10-28-97 Received: 10-28-97 Analyzed: 10-29-97 Reported: 10-30-97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9681 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 97100387 E-1S 590 0.39 0.90 1.6 16 97100388 E-1D 770 3.0 8.7 4.1 29 .100389 E-2 320 N.D. 0.17 0.81 3.8 97100390 E-3 660 1.1 3.4 2.0 21 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~, Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ...,...-.'..."".' ~'.....¡....,"""'...,'-)'~'"\!o'...-.. ~. "", .... ,I' .,' ~ "I~ :'r~~ " ~~. .. .... ~ , ~ j~f~ ' Ship To: ()(I''''''^' 0($"...+ AOl..Î Atm: "r ~ <:.ß' r "" + rii \' " . , '0' :.. ')()ftL mA " ': . 'í.J::a"h;,..:·tð . ; " R:n:~~'i~f'<'~- ,..... c ~\I,.: .;,; ~. .< ..~~.~(:: ." .....~< --..;....;. ..~'.v;-~'::·:· - - .. ~,,'" ~. >.. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ~ .::It. .:t. ')t' ; Page \ oC_ ! ProjectNamc: ~J$~Ç -fI}e.,,¡,,(J, I Project No.: 0L.f,? 'I Î Site Location: 6/1,;J' '3 D, ~ I rI r. ð Date: In L.l:LJ.5:l- Date ' Tunc ð.:,. ~ I \I: , -' Depth Sample . No. - .~ ....,:fI,Borin., ...gIW<ell ',:, .... No.' ...-.-. ,c·: .,. ... =.:.:" ':::'~. f..:2. (,.1, '. i , ~ - " - A."-' _ - -" "Y"';"?: . ',0" "~'..... ,..~;:":' ......... ",;",: ., ~.",;. .'.: - ~ '",' ;. ~ Time J S'¿,¡ ...- \ c:::".1 4'i::.... .. NMENTAL SOLtmONS,INC. C ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTION8,INC. 21 Technology Drive 1172 PcUcan Bay Drive 1rvinc, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 . C ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlON8,INC. C ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTION8,INC. 1201 N. McDowcll Boulevard . " 2815 Mitcbcll Drive, Suite 103 PctaJuma, California 949S4 ' Walnut CRck, Califomia:~598 ..' Ii ' ' ."'. "..n. . , ,\:;·}:·:';,':,-',':·:-;:;.,'·..:·:,.·Ø¡· <-;-r.~~ -" ,. - ~.-. .-.~ '" .: ..~~~ .:;.. '. " ,'i ~ .. - Date It)! ;;¡¡f:J7 i6 .. l.)?-c¡..., , " Company )D ENVIRO "L_J IT: 7 t..( (?') ( ù.. , . . ,. . . - - - . - . , - - . - - - , ':'_..;. Total N~9¡Samplca Shipped:, !:L. ::~'..~~;;. ..~:. .. :~'. )"':.::-.",!.; . .",', . ,'. Rei shed Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: , , , ReliJiquishcd by: . ~.vcd by: s~ÌnšiiUctions I SblpØ.:ut I HaDdUDg Sun¡e Rcqulremcms: " ,,)_:~~¡¡·:.~~I,,~..- . lVI ..J ~ '- ...._..~_.~..j.:~:. ..;.....,' :..~.,."._~..~. ."'t1..M ~ ?}J~'~:;'~¡' .- ,', ' ;' . ~ ,':"~~';;~';.',i;}:"v>',;, ' :,::¡'f).':~¡\: The materlal(~) listed areRœlml for anal1S1s and/or treatabDlty evaluation and remain the ;;~0,;C~'!~~ propert)' of the diem and not·Envlronmental Solutions, IDC. At the conclusion øl the test work, t~t'" alll1!"1~J aterlal(s) WID be returned to the dlmt for emttual døposaJ at a licensed facility! . t: ~j:tI;:?~:t~~~'Wf.¥~fir:t0:'I;':;~;¿:'t::~ -:'/:~;;::;, ~' , ;~.L1D - ShiFt Signature: Signanøc A A_ .'''''¡. " I' ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. D&. .. ~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 . . "';;~ 4620. E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoen.iX, AZ 8504~ (602) 736-0960 Fax (6020) 1.~3l6-0970 Env~ronmental Solut~ons, Inc. Cl~ent Project ID: BNSF-Navy ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton Client Project #: 92-247 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020 Sample Description: Air, Sampled : 09-15-97 Received: 09-15-97 Analyzed: 09-18-97 Reported: 09-19-97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9546 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 97090212 E-1S 690 0.42 1.0 1.1 15 97090213 E-1D 740 2.6 9.5 4.2 32 .090214 E-2 290 N.D. N.D. 0.63 2.8 97090215 E-3 710 1.0 3.3 2.0 20 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ég~ ~, Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ".,«¡ '} " ....... i.-.....:;.:.,....::.......c _ort ... .....¿....~. '.... "', ......\~~~: I. ",;..'!...:,-. - .. " '. .,' ... '*£";';' ·...(...10...·'.· ..... ,. > ... -' .... .-...... ...il ~:I ~.~-.;,I -~ ,"~ '-:'J> .. . ... . ... " .' ., ;\T .". . Ship To: n-rc.....cj tcc....t An.:;,' Page 'of' CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD· A~ ~~;[JOp.~¡:-~:Q\:::~: ~~~,~~~~V'l()I'\ 'i/¡<:l~An0alYSl0'S (' . '. b\e\'\dOl\P tþt SileLocation: ßc.I""...f.;~lcI CA . ~'l( , ./ Date: "'\ 1...l.:L-1...12.- ~ . ' BoringIWdl Sample Sample Type ~ ~ Sample Containers '\; .,' No. No. Depth , Date Tame Water Solid Other 8 0 Vol. No. ITvoc Pres. ~~ Remarks E- \ c:. "/~/t;, In1~ I D \ r&d\. 'x ¡:;'-\n · 1['\1.(' \ " ~ ç . Z. 11'\4~ I I I "- ..' E· '\ ' ''J In&.l<..v J., ,~ '/.. .- , . , . .. TataI Number of Samples Shipped: W Shippca's Signature: 1"\ , I rD.D .ß .. ^ t.. Signature Company Date . Time , Rcllrillulshed bY: li-.t.. {} 1 .A ,A..... . -r R...c a, 1,~/q, I...~ () Rcœived by: ~~----... . / O~.IJ· Q j J';Jq 7 ' / ~ N^ Relinquished by: . RecdVcd by: Relinquished by: , ' Received by: , ' SpCdal Iøstructions I ShiplllClltl H8IId1insf SCora¡e RequlmncDts: , ' , S ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlONS,INe. [] ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlONS.INC. " '~IV-. 1-4- c:- +. 21 TccbnologyDrive 1172PcUcanBayDrivc 1<tJt ~ ~,11:0..I\I\ ' ~ Irvinc,Califomia92718 DaytonaBcach,Florida 32119 [J ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. [J ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. , The materlaJ(s) listed are reœlftd for analysis and/or treatabDlty evaluation and remain the 1201 N. McDowcll Boulevard 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 property or lent and not EnYlronmen. tal SoIuUons, loe. At the conclusIon ÐI the lest work, I ~ Petaluma, California 94954 Walnut Cn:ck. California 94S98 all remalnl rlal(s) will be returned to the cUent ror eventual disposal at a Dcensed raclDty. ~. __ " .. ',,;-. '. ~J .... . .', ~~':;V t '/ . Environmenta~ so~utions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 I . .ø. ... ~~ -- ~ -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 c~ient project ID: Navy oil c~ient Project #: 92-247 ; . Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020 Samp~e Description: Air, Samp~ed : 08-08-97 Received: 08-08-97 Ana~yzed: 08-08-97 Reported: 08-11-97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9444 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory C~ient Vo~ati~e Fue~ Ethy~ Tota~ Samp~e Samp~e Hydrocarbons Benzene To~uene Benzene Xy~enes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 97080152 E-1S 430 0.83 2.0 1.8 20 97080153 E-1D 410 1.8 4.4 1.9 15 .080154 E-2 170 N.D. N.D. 0.48 2.6 97080155 E-3 440 1.4 3.5 2.1 19 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTIC)\.L .~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director .....~...:: ~A~;....::o-~.~,. .:,'"' I..~¡' . . .-......;......, ....~r.-. ~"'~" . . ~_~ ot ..... _. .'. . "~,.\:, I ""~~ ~. .~. <' ~-." ........... . .~~ ......,... " ...... ... .~ <~ 1;"'" .,' ;. .~. .. ~ . . ~.,.. ',:", -, I ., '&:',. ... Ship To: ðt.A,,'6t ú.Asr lAb Page I of I CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 'Atm: :~:::7: ~~~(:1~~ ~If/;~~' ø'~0·alYS10'S If' . Site Location: 13 f L. <.. <:t~ . Date' Au~. I_~_.L.:IL L, ~ ' . BoringlWelJ Sample Sample Type ~ ~ Sample Containers 4 ~f'\ '. " No." No. Depth Date Time Water Solid Other 8 C Vol. No. ITvoc Pres. ': ' . Remarks 1=. - J S ¿ Igje:J I- ~ I L íd flt : E.. - J D $ Ie 11 "- I (.... ~d. " '¡:' - 2 ¡( If- r:tel -'(' I E. - ~ ;.. f.... I L. ;<d 'P.r , . . " . ~ . Total Number of Samples Shipped: tJ. Shipper's Signature: Signature Company Date Time Rel1rvndshed1w: t?1 A~ r Y47DI--7/11'- éSI:" ß.t.,~.)f JCjij'¡- bl'J.A.t Recei~by: ~~h!,h</t?yør .) ðr:.4 r¥/Ø/?7 ¡5''P///, Relinquiihed by: 7 ,.' ' I . , Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Speciallnstructioøs I Sbipmœt I HaødIin¡f Stmge RcquiremeDts: . ' , ,. . It ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlONS,INe. [J ENVIRONMENTALSOLUTlONS,INe. ,'. " -",M'" 21 Technology Drive 1172 PeUcan Bay Drive , IrviDc,Califonùa 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 [] ENVIRONMENTAL SoLUTIONS, INe. [] ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INe. The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis and/or treatabDlty ewluatlon and remain the 1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 28IS MitcheU Drive, Suite 103 property or the dlent and not F.ßyfronmental Solutions, IDC. At the conc:luslon of the test work, Petaluma, California 949.54 Walnut Creek, California 94S"':'" . all remalnf erfal(s) wDl be returned to the c:lJent ror enntual disposal at a licensed radUty. . ___ ....-- . . .- w ro. Recyclable and made from recycled paper \6<;9 ""! . ATIACHMENT E CALCULATIONS '. . TIIC .,..c Step 4: Calculate pounps of VOCs Destroyed per Day (VQCd) Where: VOCd=Wc «60minlhr) (2~hr/day) (Ave Flow Rate (90Ih/mole))/1 (379 cu ftllb mole) ~rday per day Lbs. Lhs. per day per day Lbs.perday pcrday per day per day per day pe:rday per day pee day per day per day per day pee day per day pee day 2 VOCd De\:9.Þ VOCð Jan 95= VOCd Feb 95= Ave of JanU~and March = (447 + 210)/2 3281bs per day VOCð Ma<95= 21 Lbs, VOCd AprJ5 = VOCd Ma¡'J5 = VOCd June 95 = VOCd July 95 VOCð AU8, 95 VOCð Sept 95 VOCd Oct 95 VOCd Nov. 9S VOCð Dee, 95 VOCð Feb, 96 VOCð Mar, 96 VOCð AI", 96 VOCð May 96 VOCd June 96 Lbs. Lhs. Lbs. Lbs. Lhs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. pee day per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs, per day Lbs. per day Lbs.perday Lbs, per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs. per day Lbs, per day « 14~ :!48 21 9~ 17 161 16r l1i 18' 5j 90, 10' 94: 2~ ~ 2 30 79 66 66 59 54 43 31 52 50 50 V<>Cd July 96 VOCd Aug. VOCd Sept VOCd Oct VOCd Nov. VOCd Dec. VOCd Feb5. 97 VOCð Feb26, 97 VOCð Mar, 97 VOCd April. 97 VOCd May, 97 VOCd June. 97 VOCd JuYAu8, 97 VOCd Sept, 97 VOCð Oct 97 VOCd Nov. 97 96 96 96 96 96 CALCULATION Step 2: Input Flow Rates from Weekly Monitoring Flow Rate· CFM US E,jQ .EoZ U Dec. 5. 1994 55 48 33 30 Dec. 30. 1994 55 48 33 30 Ave. Dec. 1994 55 48 33 30 Dec. TotaJ = 166 Jan, 17, 1995 7i 68 34 32 Ave. Jan 1995 7i 68 34 32 Jan. Tow = 211 Feb, 2, 1995 52 50 27 24 Feb, 16, 1995 55 50 28 25 Ave Feb. 1995 53 50 28 25 Feb Total = 158 Mar. 3, 1995 87 74 36 35 Mar, 8, 1995 80 78 32 37 Mar, 15, 1995 99 96 40 39 Mar,21. 1995 83 83 38 36 Mar, 29, 1995 93 94 43 40 Ave Mar. t995 88 85 38 37 Mar. Total = 248,6 AI", 13, 1995 74 70 35 54 ADr, 23. 1995 43 46 50 35 Ave. Apr. 1995 58.5 58 42.5 44,5 Apr. Total= 203,5 May, 4, 1995 32 51 45 51 May, 10,1995 34 58 42 39 Mav, 18, 1995 40 51 43 42 Ave. May 1995 35.3 53.3 43.3 44 May.TolaI= 176 June. 21, 1995 51 63 69 57 June. Total= 240 July, 25, 1995 57 66 68 64 July. Tow= 255 Au~. 28. 1995 48 57 64 51 August TalaJ= 220 Sept. 28. 1995 69 69 71 51 Sept. Total= 260 Nov. 2. 1995 85 80 60 25 Ck.-r:. Total= 250 Nov. 30. 1995 85 80 60 25 Nov. Total= 250 Dee, 14, 1995 72 72 60 46 Dec. Total= 250 Feb,28, 1996 67 74 71 39 Feb, TolaI= 250 Mar 19,1996 67,1 73,8 70.5 38,6 Mar. Total= 250 AI" 26, \996 62,8 85,\ 6\.8 40,3 Apr. Total= 250 May 22. 1996 62.5 81.3 6\.6 44,6 May Total= 250 Jun. 28. 1996 62 82 60 46 June Total= 250 July, 1996 65 85 62 40 July Total= 252 Aug. 1996 65 85 60 40 Aug. Total= 250 Sept, 1996 65 85 60 40 Sept TI03l= 250 Oct 1996 75 65 65 45 Oct 1996= 250 Nov. 1996 75 65 65 45 Nov. 1996= 250 Dee, 1996 75 65 65 45 Dee, 1996= 250 Feb,51997 75 65 65 45 FebS,97= 250 Feb, 26 1997 75 65 65 45 Feb26, 97= 250 Mar,97 7S 65 65 45 Mar. 97= 250 April. 97 75 65 65 45 April. 97 = 250 May, 1997 75 65 65 45 May 97= 250 June. 1997 75 65 65 45 June. 97= 250 JuYAug, 1997 75 65 65 45 Jul/Au8,97= 2SO Sep<.I997 75 65 65 45 Sept. 97. = 250 Oct, 1997 75 65 65 45 Oct, 97, = 250 Nov. 1997 75 65 65 45 Nov. 97 250 Dec. 1997 75 65 65 45 Dec.97 = 250 Page 1 U 650 9000 4500 1800 3700 2000 2800 1400 4000 1300 1800 1900 2200 2200 3500 2500 1600 1300 1100 1500 1700 160 210 830 1100 1100 830 820 780 440 710 660 670 NA Step I: Input TPH Results from Quarterly Sampling Effluent TPH- ppmv (EPA 8015) Bag Samples .EoZ 860 1800 1600 440 2100 1900 560 1200 800 410 380 460 720 580 160 290 540 590 510 1000 2000 1400 5 320 490 93 410 330 260 170 290 320 220 NA Step 3: Calculate Weighted Concentration (Wc of Hydrocarbons in Flow To ThennaI Oxidizer Wc=(TPH' Row E-1S) + (TPH . Row E-lD) + (TPH . Row E-2) + (TPH·Row E·3)/Ave Row For Monlh ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv ppmv E,jQ 5700 3000 3800 1600 1500 1300 1300 1200 3500 1500 2700 3100 3300 2000 2800 2500 1100 1500 1500 1600 490 1800 550 1700 650 1100 870 790 560 410 740 770 910 NA US 5400 9800 710 620 2600 2(()O 1600 1300 \900 1100 2600 2000 1500 1000 2500 2100 1100 1500 1100 1600 1800 \500 550 850 920 880 700 660 500 430 690 590 580 NA 3726 6198 No bag Samples Collected 2472' 1120 2419 1809 1546 1268 2436 1082 2019 1929 No Samples Collected 1926 1362 2185 1855 1058 1244 1094 1440 1387 1311 347 930 770 772 692 637 504 359 603 579 588 NA Apr. 1995 May, 1995 June. 1995 July, 1995 Aug, 1995 Sept. 1995 Oct 1995 Nov. 1995 Dee, 1995 Feb. 1996 Mar. 1996 AI". 1996 May, 1996 June. '996 July. 1996 August. 1996 Sept, 1996 Oct. 1996 Nov. 1996 Dec. 1996 Feb, 5,1997 Feb,26. 1997 Mar, 1997 Apr. 1997 May, 1997 June. 1991 JuVAug.l997 Sept. 1997 Ocl, 1997 Nov. 1997 Dee, 1997 We Dec. 94 = We Jan. 9; = We Feb. 95 = We Mar. 95 = We Apr. 9S = We May 95 = We June 9S = We July 95 = We Aug. 9S = We Sept. 95 = We Oct, 95 = WcNoy.95= WeDee,95= We Jan. 96 = We Feb. 96= Wc·Mar.96= We AI", 96= We May. 96= We June 96= We ]uly 96= We August 96= We Sept, 96= We Oct, 96= We Nov. 96= We Dee,96= We Feb5. 97= We Feb26, 97= We Mar. 91= We April. 97= We May. 97= We June. 97= We JullAug. 97= We Sept, 97= We Oct 97= We Nov. 97= We Dee, 97= .~ . .