The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMITIGATION (7) BNSF ..~' .' MICK HARDIN Manager Environmental Remediation The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 (909) 386-4081 August 26, 1998 01002724-61 Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 íR.:::: :1''\ £:0 rr.. -~'ëJ'r' > I '1I;'<>p",,\. ~.. .l Þ.:;!L; o 1¡,J .., 1 '.:.,) J f 1998 ~ ' ;' j r"" , L-'" ~ ~ .... .., r ';: _"' ~.. ~~.-:: .'~ ~¡ Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed for your review is copy of Semi-Annual Monitoring Report for January through December 1998 covering the former Navy Oil Company lease site near the corner of Union and Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers actions taken for operations and maintenance of the remediation system, along with groundwater monitoring. As requested, analysis for MTBE was included in the June 1998 sampling. MTBE was not detected in any of the groundwater samples. As covered in my letter of transmittal dated May 18, 1998, we continue to recommend closure for this site. In view of the Risk-Based Closure Assessment forwarded with my May 18, 1998 letter along with analysis results indicating non-detect for MTBE we request issuance of closure documentation. If questions arise during your review of the above information, please contact me at the above telephone number. Sincerely, h:J~ ~- -_. Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure cc Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue I 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/o enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen TRC Environmental Solutions I Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92718 I:\AMIPRO\SB\MEH081101.SAM BNSF ..,~. , . .' Burlington Northern Santa Fe 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 (909) 386-4081 Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 October 7, 1996 File: 01002724-61 I/ò) œ; (Ç iõWl~ t¡' OCT 9 1996 ~ By ~ Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed for your review is copy of Semi-Annual Monitoring Report for the First Half 1996 covering the fonner Navy Oil Company lease site near the corner of Union and Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers groundwater monitoring and performance tracking of the vapor extraction system. If questions arise during your review of this report, please contact Mick Hardin at the above telephone number. Sincerely, ~:.-k ~~ Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure ~. cc: Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen Environmental Solutions 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92718 (w/o enclosure) ~. '. '.' TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, Colifornio 92718 Telephone 714-727-9336 Facsimile 714·727-7399 September 17, 1996 Project No. 92-247 Mr. Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Santa Fe Railway Company 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, California 92408 Semiannual Monitoring Report for 1996 Ground Water Recovery and Vapor Extraction System Former Navy Oil Company Lease Site Bakersfield. California Dear Mr. Hardin: This report summarizes the progress of the ground water recovery system and vapor extraction system (VES) activities for January 1996 through June 1996 at the former Navy Oil Company Lease site in Bakersfield, California. Enclosed are three copies, one for your file, one to forward to Mr. Brian Pitts at the Kern County Department of Environmental Health Services (KCDEHS), and one to forward to Mr. Howard Wines at the City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services. Key activities included monthly monitoring and maintenance of the YES and ground water recovery system, and ground water monitoring. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. Figure 1 (attached) shows the ground water recovery system and the YES. 2. Fuel hydrocarbons are being extracted from the vadose zone through four vapor extraction wells (E-l shallow [E-IS], E-l deep [E-ID] and E-2 and E-3). The fuel vapors are destroyed in a thermal oxidizer permitted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJV APCD). Samples of vapor from each extraction well are collected monthly to track the progress of the YES. The monthly monitoring indicates that over the first half of 1996, the YES is extracting and burning on the average of approximately 143 pounds of hydrocarbons per day. 3. Ground water impacted with low levels of dissolved phase fuel constituents (benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene [BTXE]) is extracted from two ground water monitoring wells, MW -4 and MW -7. The extracted ground water is pumped into a holding tank and then discharged into the city industrial sewer under an Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit issued by the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department. The effluent is sampled semiannually for IWD permit compliance and parameter concentrations have consistently been below permit limitations. Approximately 69,300 gallons of ground water have been extracted and discharged from January to June 1996. <Ð · · · TIIC Environmental Solutions/ne. Mr. Mick Hardin September 17, 1996 Page 2 2.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING 1 . Semiannual sampling and gauging of seven monitoring wells onsite were completed on June 28, 1996 and included the following activities: · Measurement of depth to ground water. · Measurement of thickness of free product, if present. · Sampling and analysis of one sample from each monitoring well for volatile fuel hydrocarbons (VFH), extractable fuel hydrocarbons (EFH), and BTXE by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) Methods 8015M/8020. Figure 1 shows the locations of the onsite monitoring wells. VOLUME OF GROUND WATER RECOVERED i . Table 1 provides a summary of the volume of ground water pumped from MW -4 and MW -7 during the first half of 1996. Approximately 69,300 gallons of water were discharged into the industrial sewer from December 22, 1995 through June 28, 1996. To date, approximately 145,800 gallons of water have been recovered from ground water pumping activities. 2. The pump in MW -7 was removed in February 1996 and sent to the manufacturer for repair. The pump was replaced in March 1996. The electric motor on the air compressor failed in March and a new electric motor was installed on April 29, 1996. GROUND WATER AND PRODUCT MEASUREMENTS 1 . On June 28, 1996, depth to ground water and free product thickness were measured in MW-2, -3, -5, -6, and -8. Ground water levels were not measured in MW-1, -4 and-7 since MW-4 and MW-7 are fitted with recovery pumps and MW-1 is within an area used by the City of Bakersfield for stockpiling rubble and debris and was not accessible. 2. Table 2 summarizes the historic water level and product thickness data. Free product was not detected in the monitoring wells, however an oily sheen and a hydrocarbon odor were present in samples taken from MW-2, -4, and -7. Generally, ground water elevations were approximately 0.4 foot lower than the previous monitoring event in December 1995. @ · · · TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. Mr. Mick Hardin September 17, 1996 Page 3 GROUND WATER QUALITY 1. Ground water samples collected from MW-3, -5, -6, and -8 were analyzed for BTXE by EP A Method 8020, and for EFH and VFH by EP A Method 8015M. The results are summarized in Table 3 and indicate that EFH, VFH and BTXE concentrations have remained below detection limits. The laboratory reports and Chain-of-Custody forms are included in Attachment A. 2. MW-2, -4. and -7 are located within the area ofthe impacted ground water identified during previous investigations and an oily sheen was observed in each of these three samples. Since previous monitoring indicates concentrations of VFH and BTXE are decreasing, MW-2, -4 and -7 will be resampled in December 1996. IWD PERMIT COMPLIANCE SAMPLING 1 . Samples of the recovered ground water discharged into the city sewer were collected on June 28, 1996 and analyzed for the parameters required by the IWD Permit. 2. The analytical results indicate that the effluent parameters are within the IWD Permit limitations. A copy of the laboratory reports were forwarded to the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department and to the KCDEHS. A copy ofthe last monitoring report submitted to the City is included in Attachment B. 3.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM 1 . The YES is monitored monthly to ensure the equipment is operating properly and to monitor the progress of remediation. Photoionization detector (PID) readings of influent and effluent volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations indicated that the thermal oxidizer was operating within the parameters of the SJV APCD Permit limits. PERFORMANCE TRACKING 1 . PID readings and flow rates from each of the four extraction wells are summarized in Table 4. The PID readings are used for field-tracking of hydrocarbon levels in the soil vapor. 2. YES vent wells vacuum measurements are summarized in Table 5. The results show vacuum levels in the vent wells which indicate the YES is effective to the perimeter of the soil plume. 3. Vapor samples were collected from the four extraction wells on a monthly basis to track the fuel hydrocarbon levels in the soil vapor and to also calculate the number of pounds of hydrocarbons destroyed. The samples were analyzed by a State-certified laboratory, and the results are shown in Table 6. The laboratory reports are included in Attachment C. @ · · · TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. Mr. Mick Hardin September 17, 1996 Page 4 The samples were tested for the following parameters: · VFH: EPAMethod8015M · BTXE: EP A Method 8020 Based on the VFH analysis results (Table 6) and the flow from each well (Table 4), the pounds ofVOCs destroyed each month since startup on December 7, 1994 are shown below. The supporting calculations are shown in Attachment D. VOCs DESTROYED DAYS IN VOCs DESTROYED MONTH PER DAY OPERA nON PER MONTH (Pounds) (Pounds) December 1994 211 17 3,587 January 1995 447 18 8,046 February 1995 328 21 6,888 March 1995 210 21 4,410 April 1995 78 26 2,028 May 1995 146 31 4,526 June 1995 148 30 4,440 July 1995 135 23 3,105 August 1995 95 4 380 September 1995 217 30 6,510 October 1995 93 8 744 November 1995 173 12 2,076 December 1995 165 23 3,795 January 1996 165* 18 2,970 February 1996 165 14 2,310 March 1996 116 30 3,480 April 1996 187 26 4,862 May 1996 159 31 4,929 June 1996 90 30 2,700 Cumulative Total Since Startup (December 7, 1994): 71,786 * Average of December 1995 and February 1996. 4.0 CLOSING REMARKS 1 . The conversion to continuous discharge has improved ground water recovery rates. Ground water recovery and disposal for the first half of 1996 has already exceeded all of 1995 production. A recovery pump may be installed in MW - 2 if future monitoring indicates that pumping from the monitoring well would enhance the ground water remediation. <Ð · · · TIIC Environmental Solutions/ne. Mr. Mick Hardin September 17, 1996 Page 5 2. The YES has removed approximately 21,251 pounds ofVOCs from the soil during the first half of 1996. Over this period the thermal oxidizer was operational for approximately 75 percent of the time. 3 . In June 1996, the YES was fitted with a "data fax," a cellular phone-based communications interface module (CIM), that sends a daily fax of system operations. To minimize down time, the CIM is programmed to fax a daily status report to TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s office. 4. The ground water recovery system and YES are operating on a steady basis and will continue through the remainder of 1996. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~ Tim C. Lassen, P.E. Project Director TCUJA:bdg Attachments cc: Miro Knezevic <Ð .~. . . en w ..J m ~ (J:l:z Recyclable and made from recycled paper, 1.6& . . !e TABLE 1 1996 SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER DISCHARGE FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1996 QUARTERS 1996 DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Ground Water Discharged Into Sanitary 35,800 33,500 69,300 Sewer Under IWD Permit (gallons) Total through December 1995 76,500 Cumulative Total (1) 145,800 92-247 (9/12/96/dr) (1) Cumulative effluent pumped from MW-4 and MW-7. ~--'''--'¥''-''-'''-''--'-- · · · TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Page I of 2 TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECTED THICKNESS EQUIVALENT CORRECfED MONITORING CASING DATE W A TER(2) WATER LEVEL OF FREE WATER WATER LEVEL WELL NO. ELEVATION(I) ELEV ATION(I) PRODUCT THICKNESS(3 ELEV A TION(4) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) MW-l 399.98 December 1988 99.67 300.31 0.00 0.00 300.31 January 1990 99.02 300.96 0.00 0.00 300.96 February 1992 100.09 299.89 0.00 0.00 299.89 March 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) June 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) December 1995 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) June 1996 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) MW-2 400.28 December 1988 102.96 297.32 0.58 0.44 297.76 January 1990 101.62 298.66 0.58 0.44 299.10 February 1992 102.35 297.93 0.02 0.01 297.94 March 1995 99.88 300.40 0.00 0.00 300.40 June 1995 100.62 299.66 0.10 0.08 299.74 December 1995 100. I 3 300.15 0.00 0.00 300.15 June 1996 100.55 299.73 0.00(6) 0.00 299.73 MW-3 401.40 December 1988 102.40 299.10 0.00 0.00 299.10 January 1990 102.08 299.32 0.00 0.00 299.32 February 1992 102.70 298.70 0.00 0.00 298.70 March 1995 100.20 300.70 0.00 0.00 300.70 June 1995 10 1.1 5 300,25 0.00 0.00 300.25 December 1995 101.03 300.37 0.00 0.00 300.37 June 1996 101.36 300.04 0,00 0.00 300.04 MW-4 398.20 January 1990 100.88 297.32 0.00 0.00 297.32 February 1992 105.25 292.95 0.25 0.19 292.76 March 1995 102.38 294.94 0.25 0.19 295.13 397.32(7) June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) MW-5 402.22 January 1990 103.08 299.14 0.00 0.00 299.14 February 1992 104.15 298.07 0.00 0.00 298.07 March 1995 101.86 300.36 0.00 0.00 300.36 June 1995 102.36 299.86 0.00 0.00 299.86 December 1995 102.12 300.10 0.00 0.00 300.10 . June 1996 102.54 299.68 0.00 0.00 299.68 MW-6 401.56 January 1990 102.38 299.18 0.00 0.00 299.18 March 1992 103.35 298.21 0.00 0.00 298.21 March 1995 101.01 300.55 0.00 0.00 300.55 June 1995 10 1.5 3 300.03 0.00 0.00 300.03 December 1995 101.23 300.33 0.00 0.00 300.33 June 1996 101.69 299.87 0,00 0.00 299.87 (I) Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey. referenced from benchmark No. 363 (elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union A venue overpass. (2) Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well. (3) Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76, Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free product multiplied by the specific gravity of product. (4) Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water level elevation. (5) MW-l could not be located. and was not sampled. (6) Gasoline odor and sheen on water surface. (7) New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. (8) MW-4 and MW-7 were not measured due to pump installations, (9) New elevation after casing cut down 0.89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. · · · TABLE 2 GROUND WATER ELEVATION SUMMARY FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (Continued) Page 2 of 2 TOP OF DEPTH TO UNCORRECfED THICKNESS EQUIVALENT CORRECfED MONrroRlNG CASING DATE WATER(2) WATER LEVEL OF FREE WATER WATER LEVEL WELL NO. ELEV A TION(I) ELEV A TION(I) PRODUcr THICKNESS(3 ELEV A TION(4) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) MW-7 400.54 February 1992 107.95 292.59 0.50 0.38 292.21 399.65(9) March 1995 10 1.80 297.85 0.00 0.00 297.85 June 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) December 1995 (8) (8) (8) (8) (8) June 1996 (8) (8) (6)(8) (8) (8) MW-8 402.25 March 1992 103.00 299.25 0.00 0.00 299.25 March 1995 100.69 301.56 0.00 0.00 301.56 June 1995 101.22 301.03 0.00 0.00 301.03 December 1995 100.88 301.37 0.00 0.00 301.37 June 1996 101.47 300.78 0.00 0.00 300.78 92-247 (9/12/96/dr) (I) Elevations in feet above mean sea level established by vertical transit survey. referenced from benchmark No. 363 (elevation 408 feet) located at the Santa Fe Union Avenue overpass. (2) Measured and/or referenced from top of casing of each monitoring well. (3) Specific gravity of product assumed to be approximately 0.76. Equivalent water thickness is equal to the thickness of the free product multiplied by the specific gravity of product. (4) Equal to the equivalent water thickness of the free product added to the uncorrected water level elevation. (5) MW-l could not be located. and was not sampled. (6) Gasoline odor and sheen on water surface. (7) New elevation after casing cut down 0.88 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. (8) MW-4 and MW-7 were not measured due to pump installations. (9) New.elevation after casing cut down 0.89 feet during installation of vault in April 1993. . . . TABLE 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUND WATER MONITORING WELLS FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EPA METHOD 8015M EPA METHOD 602 MONITORING MONITORED FREE EFH VFH Benzene Toluene Xylenes Ethylbenzene WELL PRODUcr (mg/L)(l) (mg/L)(2) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mgIL) (mg/L) MW-2 31l5/95 -- 46 11 0.47 0.18 0.52 0.18 6/21/95 1.25 inches NA NA 0.38 0.29 0.45 0.1 12/14/95 -- 30 2.4 0.028 0.011 0,170 0.081 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-3 3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0,05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0,5 <0.5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 121l4/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 MW-4 31l5/95 3 inches 7,800 5,400 < 1.5(3) <1.5(3) <2.5(3) <2.5(3) 6/21/95 Observed in NA NA 0.052 0,053 0.68 0.072 pump discharge 12/14/95 -- 22 5.0 0.042 0.016 0.76 0.190 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-5 3/15/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 MW-6 31l5/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0,5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 12/14/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0,0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 MW-7 3/15/95 Sheen 4.0 4.0 0.52 0.057 0.29 0.073 6/21/95 Observed in NA NA 0,705 0,780 4.5 0.250 pump discharge 12/14/95 -- 72 4.9 0.22 <0.0003 0.210 0.054 6/27/96 Sheen & odor NA NA NA NA NA NA MW-8 31l5/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 0.00083 <0.0005 <0.0005 6/21/95 -- <0.5 <0.5 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 121l4/95 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0,0005 6/27/96 -- <0.5 <0.05 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 (9/17/96/dr 92-247 EFH = Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons VFH = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons. NA = Not Analyzed. < = Less than detection limit shown. - = Not Observed. D = Shading indicates location of recovery pumps. EFH quantitated against a diesel standard (C7cC30). VFH quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-CI4) Detection limits are elevated due to interferences from the high concentrations of EFH and VFH (1 (2 (3 me Environmental SoIutiooslnc. . . . TABLE 4 EXTRACTION WELL PID AND FLOW RATE FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EXTRACTION WELL DAlE E-lS E-ID E-2 E-3 Flow PID Flow PID Flow PID Flow PID (cfm) (cfm) (cfm) (cfm) 7/25/95 57 123 66 117 68 76 64 130 8/28/95 48 NM 57 NM 64 NM 51 NM 9/28/95 69 160 69 135 71 77 51 153 11/2/95 85 290 80 264 60 90 25 280 11/30/95 85 NM 80 NM 60 NM 25 NM 12/14/95 85 741 80 1,099 60 285 25 944 1/24/96 NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l NM-l 2/28/96 75 343 79, 464 64 416 32 171 3/19/96 67 126 74 310 70 105 39 149 4/26/96 63 210 85 228 62 36 40 197 5/22/96 63 392 81 483 62 262 44 576 6/28/96 65 176 80 281 62 118 43 151 -- - .- (9/17/96/dr) 92-247 Photoionization Detector. Cubic feet per minute. Not measured due to PID failure. Not measured due to thermal oxidizer failure. - PID cfm NM NM-I Ernfironrm:!intal Solutions In(, _. _A_ Notes I. Piping from each extraction well is equipped with a pitot tube to measure flow rate and a sample port to sample well gas. 2. Flow rates are calculated from differential pressure measurements recorded at the pitot tube in the piping from each extraction wel 3. PID readings are measured at the sample port in the piping from each extraction well. . . . TABLE 5 VACUUM READING FROM VES VENT WELLS FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (inches of water) DATE AND VACUUM READING VENT WELL NO. 6/28/96 5/22/96 - 1.35 4/26/96 3/19/96 2/28/96 1/24/96 12/14/95 11/30/95 11/2/95 9/28/95 8/28/95 7/25/95 1.49 0.31 (2) 0.98 28 1 (1) >1.0 0.78 0.54 >1.0 0.25 1.42 1.30 1.30 0.70 0.20(2) 0.06(2) 0.87 20 1 (1) o >1 0.54 0.36 >1.0 15 o 1.47 0.82 20 1 (1) 0.9 0.44 0.30 >1.0 13 o 0.80 10(2) o 0.53 (3) (1) o >1 0.40 0.28 0.60 12 o 23 1 1.15 0.38(2) 0.83 10 1 (1) o >1 0.64 0.44 o >1 0.22 10 1 1.05 1.00 1.20 0.08(2) 0.70 1.00 (I) 0.90 0.51 0.30 0.95 10 o 1.02 12(2) o 0.63 0.90 (1 ) 0.84 0.45 0.22 0.85 0.08 NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM V-I V-2 V-3 V-4 V-5 V-6 V-7 V-8 39 1 0.03(2) 0.78 1.15 (1) o >1 0.49 0.24 >1.0 0.05 35 33 36 34 34 (1) 30 30 27 46 45 52 Oxidizer Manifold Vacuum (9/l6/96/bdg) 92-247 Thennal oxidizer was off and could not be restarted. No measurement taken. Thennal oxidizer was found off. Measurements taken only shortly (1 to 3 hours) after thennal oxidizer restarted. Well was covered by standing water. (1) (2) (3) YES automatically shutdown prior to our technician's arrival due to a local power outage. NM = Not measured since . . . TABLE 6 . ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF VAPOR SAMPLES FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY LEASE SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EXTRACTION WELL E-lS E-lD E-2 E-3 DA1E Hydrocaroon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) Hydrocarbon Analyses (ppmv) VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl VFH Benzene Toluene Total Ethyl Xylenes Benzene Xylenes Benzene Xylenes Benzene Xylenes Benzene 7/25/95 1,600 7.9 55 130 17 1.300 6.6 56 100 14 500 0,9 11 38 4.9 2,800 10 100 200 26 8/28/95 1,300 5.8 36 64 13 1.200 4,6 31 64 9.7 1,200 5.1 36 75 11 1 ,400 6.5 44 86 13 9/28/95 1,900 8.1 65 190 21 3.500 16 142 100 50' 800 NO 4 14 6.5 4,000 12 120 92 40 11/2/95 1,100 4.0 23 100 13 1.500 8,6 56 140 22 410 NO NO 13 NO 1,300 5.4 31 95 13 11/30/95 2,600 3.4 16 72 11 2.700 7.9 50 140 25 380 NO 1.9 6.5 NO 1,800 4.9 30 84 14 12/14/95 2.000 6.7 30 140 19 3.100 17 150 380 65 460 NO NO 14 NO 1,900 12 77 240 37 2/28/96 1.500 6.3 35 160 25 3,300 13 91 290 55 720 NO 6.3 53 10 2.200 9.6 61 200 39 3119/96 1,000 4.0 15 79 12 2,000 7.5 41 120 21 580 NO 2.9 17 3.4 2.200 5.9 33 110 18 4/26/96 2,500 4.4 16 120 15 2,800 8.6 41 150 24 160 NO 0.8 4.0 0.9 3.500 5.3 27 107 20 5/22/96 2,100 4.8 17 110 15 2.500 7.6 45 130 23 290 NO 0.9 18 3.2 2,500 5.4 30 110 18 6/28/96 1,100 2.6 10 81 11 1,100 5.1 29 82 14 540 NO 0.9 14 2.6 1,600 4.6 25 99 16 (9/17/96/dr me Environmental Solutions Inc. 92-247 VFH = Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons. NO = Not detected. ppmv = Parts per million by volume. ·~ -. . C/) w a: ~ CJ u:: DV. Recyclable and made from recycled paper, ì6¢9 . . . SEWER CONNECTION (IWD PERMIT) FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY SITE 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. i ., ~ a: ~ 8 Q MW·1 èr ::æ ~ ~ (\ ØI /' ~\ r FOOTPRINT OF / Y YADOSE ZONE PLUME rf'-'-;-Y~-~\'-~-'! :1 i J~ MW-8 ~-7 I I ! \ \\ [ ~~,i I \ \ BA~ER 1 POWER POLE x E-1S V-2 TANK GAS METER I MW-6' ~1 E-1DG_G_e XI \ ~-==;-~ I I MW-2 MW-5 G X \ 0 CONTAINER I I THERMAL I OXIOIZER / . G ! Y, ~ MW-< 0 /GATE ¿ GATE,,-~ SANTAFE ~..:-A\. i ~·_·_/·_·.J:I ~~~~ MW·7 ~ V-4 \. : / '-.!-./ GEO WESTERN WAREHOUSE BUILDING (SINGLE STORY) LEGEND - - - - SANTA FE PROPERTY BOl-"IDARY -X-X- SECURITY FENCE -E - E - ELECTRICAl LINE FOR THERMAL OXIDIZER NATURAl GAS LINE FOR -G-G- SUPPLEMENTAl FUEL EXISTING CONDUIT FOR GROUND WATER -c-c- PUMPING OPERATION (BURIED 3 FEET BGS) - ss - EXISTING 14· DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER o I 60 . SCALE FIGURE 1 " MW-5 MONITORING WEll .V-7 SITE PLAN ~ ...... V-4 o E-1D VES VENT WELL 25" ANGLE VES VENT WEll VES EXTRACTION WEll 2· PVC WELL VAPOR PIPING w ::> z w > « z o Z ::> SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 120 FEET I . .~ . <C 0iJ.. Recyclable and made from recycled paper. ì6¢ì · ATTACHMENT A GROUND WATER ANALYSIS RESULTS · · Environmental Solutions Inc. I . .-. .. ~... ...... ~ -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 . Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: 3510/8015m Sample Description: Water Sampled : 06-27-96 Received: 06-28-96 Analyzed: 07-02-96 Reported: 07-08-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7667 EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 8015m) Laboratory Client Extractable Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Number Number (mg/l) 96060591 MW-5 N.D. . 96060592 MW-8 N.D. 96060593 MW-6 N.D. 96060594 MW-3 N.D. Detection Limit: 0.5 Extractable Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a diesel standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C7 to C30. Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL . ~Þ/ ~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director · . .-. ... ........ -- -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 I. Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, Ca 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 5030 I 8015m I 8020 Sample Description: Water Sampled : 06-27-96 Received: 06-28-96 Analyzed: 07-01-96 Reported: 07-08-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7667 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Surrogate Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery Number Number ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l TFT* (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) 96060591 MW-5 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 103 41060592 MW-8 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 101 060593 MW-6 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 101 96060594 MW-3 N.D. N.D. N. D.. N.D. N.D. 101 Detection Limit: 50 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as * alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~ß~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . . ... ... ....... -- -- ...... .....,. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 . QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 5030 / 8015m / 8020 Date of Analysis : 07/01/96 Laboratory Sample No : 96060591 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 7667 Analyte Benzene R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % 0.0 20 20 20 100 100 0 0.0 20 18 18 90 90 0 0.0 20 18 18 90 90 0 0.0 250 220 240 88 96 9 Toluene Ethylbenzene Hydrocarbons . Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 . ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~/~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director . . . .... .. ,.... -- -- ....... ...., ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 ac DATA REPORT Analysis: Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 8015m) Date of Analysis: 07/02/96 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 7667 Analyte R1 (ppm) SP (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % 44 RPD % 13 . Hydrocarbons 0.0 Definition of Terms: R1 MS (ppm) 5.0 2.2 50 2.5 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 I . ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD v V . . - Page I of. L - Project Name: N A..J y ') - Project No.: 77. - 'l..'-I '¡ - Site Location: ?"'I.. '~/.' \1::/1 ( ,'-.-... C þ.. , . Date: (,., I z.7 I~ - . Ship To: .:.4 ~(·'1' - r A",u AUn: ^"\,~ n.... t\..k,".\'-L~~ \ Time 5": J,.' t-> fv1. Remarks - ç .,..- , - ""-,.... ,d::ït¡-' . Company Date I~..,,, 1/,' 'Ñ'M c^,r..l,-- 'îJL"nl/l..f' h,.., / /;0 ~/ c¡{., L, V tv" ,:",1/ 'l-T'Jf : v - ...~.. + v A....\.- '" , , Total Number of Samples Shipped: 4- Shipper's Signature: ~ i_ l...<J - - - Signature ,...-----:; , - RelinQuished by: '_ / Á. I (,j~ -,-,.¿ c. - Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: 'fI P... E .&J o ~ U 0 V V v ¿, v v ..... Sample T~ Time IWaterl Solid Other , 1. <-:>-1 V - 14ùV v - IS"JO V - 15'4$ V' - 'Co~~ - t10() v- I ::¡. 3" ¡,. Sample I Depth-tEate No. / ".!..::ì !7¡ ± ~ - Boring/Wel No. ,,^w- 5 M..oJ -ß I M u,. - G;;. M ,- Z. ~ ..3. -4 ~- ~ !\.'" \. X JAil' J -, ~(' -CI ~ :tJJ_{JCQ I ...:-VlC - i:. '1l:> ' \ ~ ENVIRO ENTAL SOLUTIONS, C. . 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 (- { M, , Üi 6v~ Relinquished by: Received by: C,Y-'),^ 9 - - ,:.~ torage Requirements: ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Walnut Creek, California 94598 o The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, all remaininJ( material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facilitv. .' I : .' I .~ m (Jl:f. Recyclable and made from recycled paper. ì6S . ATTACHMENT B SEMIANNUAL MONITORING REPORT . I- . Ie . TRC Environmental Solutions Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Telephone 714-727-9336 Facsimile 714-727-7399 July 12, 1996 Project No. 92-247 Ms. Lara Kimm Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 8101 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 9~313 Semiannual Monitoring Report January through June 1996 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 Santa Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California Dear Ms. Kimm: This letter summarizes the first half of 1996 effluent monitoring results for the discharge located at the Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD permit, headspace is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit (LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis. The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below. · The total volume of ground water discharged from January 1 to June 28, 1996 was 64,110 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 356 gallons (0.0004 mgd), well below the permitted flow of 0.003 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank ranged from <0.01 percent to 0.03 percent. · As shown ~I) Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the last week of December 1995, the weekly batch discharge was modified to a continuous discharge. This work was completed as described in the Petition to Change Effluent Limitation letter dated December 8, 1995, and approved pursuant to your letter dated December 18, 1995. The revised IWD permit was issued February 2, 1996 and the sampling frequency of the discharge was reduced to semiannual sampling. @ . . '. TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. Ms. Lara Kimm July 12, 1996 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the infonnation, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." . If you have any questions or comments, please contact Matt Eaton at (714) 727-9336. Sincerely, i>Pf~ Tim C. Lassen, P. E. Project Director TCUJA:as Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Matt Eaton, TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. "'t @ · · · TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETERS MElliOD LIMITATIONS 7128/94(1) 12130/94(1) 3/21!95( \) 4/25/95(2) 6121/95(2) 9/25/95(2) 12114/95(2) 6/28/96(2) Temperature (0 F) NIA 150° F - - - - - - - 84 FIashpoint (0 C) PMCC >140 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Bio-oxygen Demand 405.1 * 0.5 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 87 (mgIL) Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2,200 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 210 <4.0 (mgIL) Total Dissolved Solids 160.4 3.500 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 340 (mgIL) pH (units) 150.1 6.0 - 12.0 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 7.2 Benzene (mgIL) 602 0.50 0.24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.001 <0.0003 0.16 Toluene (mgIL) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0.053 <0.0003 0.001 0.023 Ethyl Benzene (mgIL) 602 7.92 0.0096 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.018 0.0092 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.027 Total Xylenes (mgIL) 602 * 0.29 0.42 0.0026 0.31 0.311 0.11 0.024 0.250 Oil and Grease 413:1 * 1.8 1.8 <2.0 5.8 12 5.9 60 79 Lead 239.1 0.90 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.059 (I) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. (2) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7. 92-247 (7/12/96Ibg) N/A PMCC Not Analyzed. Pensky·Martins Closed Cup. No limits. but monitoring required. = Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. * < me Environmental Solutions lnc. ......................--- I. . . o {ft:z Recyclable and made from recycled paper, '@¡~ . ATI ACHMENT C V APOR ANALYSIS RESULTS . . ~'"'-~"~~--,-'"'-- · . ... ... ......... -- -- -- ORANGECOASTANALYnCAL,IN~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin. CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 ~ironmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom Witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m I 8020 Sample Description: Air Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7666 Sampled : 06-28-96 Received: 06-28-96 Analyzed: 06-28-96 Reported: 07-08-96 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 96060587 E-1S 1,100 2.6 10 11 81 96060588 E-1D 1,100 5.1 29 14 82 , 41060589 E-2 540 N.D. 0.9 2.6 14 060590 E-3 1,600 4.6 25 16 99 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~J ~~/1~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . , CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Remarks - ¡,/ 1/ ¡/ 1/ . Page I of. L Project Name:~ Project No.: '':¡'' - 2- Site Location: i? /'. l..- (' I ( j ,..'11::( I) Date: r: I:'f I~ -~ 4:;' to... A I . ShipTò: ()r¿'>. '"r- r ("",'r- Aun: 1'0'\ 1>.. Ii; f'.) ')0 \ r:. siPle ~ontairers Vol. l'!0' .!.1E!:.. Pres. I L I íFi) oJ' {-.J J...dï... Company F"'-/ v l.lc-J,.)V~"I.-_ T,;tf_ ~ í JI ~ I ~ \ Á--L--- . Sample T~ ~ ~ Time r Water I Solid Other! (3 0 ,/ v ../ 1/ V V y ¡/ Date roh lil- t - Lf Depth Sample No. BoringlWel No. C· 1'5 ¡:::. IÐ E-:. ¿:- 3 Time Ç.' (/V vÞ'. Date &,/2<3/4(" t Shipper's Signature: Signature ¿;p:, Total Number of Samples Shipped: ^' ("CV'11 5: .I;Qy\^ ENVIRON ENTAL SOLUTIONS, ~C. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, Ca1ifomia 92718 '>~~.. ... fl _ ,-'51<' o J7...'c o ý 6-4-V1o r rd'^ <) ^ 'f\f}j;, \ J Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: (J)AO Þ't'\Y~ () ~'(,fN...J- InstJUction~ I ShiprÍ1ent I andling! 's orage Requirements: I. Relinauished by: ~ Á _ ( oJ '? Special ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Walnut Creek, Ca1ifomia 94598 o The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility. · . .-. .-. ..... .... -- -- ..... .....,. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 4Itvironmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Hethod: EPA 8015m I 8020 Sample Description: Air sampled : 05-22-96 Received: 05-22-96 Analyzed: 05-23-96 Reported: 05-28-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7512 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 96050499 E-1S 2,100 4.8 17 15 110 96050500 E-1D 2,500 7.6 45 23 130 41050501 E-2 290 N.D. 0.9 3.2 18 6050502 E-3 2,500 5.4 30 18 110 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~~:- Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Remarks )< ':- X )( . LPage / of. L . Project Name: Æ/~ v 'I /) Ie Project No.: r¡ ~ ~ - . ~...¡ 1 Site Location:/?A/(L :;.' \ r 'j l \177r..J r-,-:- r., ,.,.......,- 1- J /' ¡ ., ¿ / \. ),/ .I\. ,. I / . Slúp To: .Qu -" AUn: /YJ, CA ~ Date: 5' I 2. ¿ I 7'('. ~Ple ~ontairers Vol. N? !.1E!: Pres. ,'- . Ií:.!> ~:> 0/ ~ I -.J T ci. . Sample E ~ Waterl Solid ~erl 8 Q. V v - - ~ ;::; .,/ v~ :: :j Date Time ~/2:h~ O/3J ~ ()7 50 ~ ðC¡'¡ù (Yl.3 to. Depth Sample No. Boring/Wel No. LS... Li2. ?- :> ) /:. l£- e E Time '71: t?> /J A ... I ¿,/o a¡.a.-0 Date ,~2. "'\/>.'1 <-Hr. C~7 d..J <9? -r;.1C' I Company "~l tL r~ ~. ~ ~.N1 J'j ~r. LJC Jl oJ { ..} ( Slúpper's Signature~- Relinquished Received by: Relinquished Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: - InstIUctions ! Shipment! Handling! Storage Requirements: Signature (....; , L 'µ:t;:. '/7/71/?_ ,. 4- Total Number of Samples Shipped: I bV:¿/. l~/ by: INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 zJ/ Special ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Walnut Creek, California 94598 o The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility. · . .... .... ..... WIlla ... -- -- ORANGECOASTANALYnCAL,IN~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 ~ironmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m I 8020 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7403 Sampled : 04-26-96 Received: 04-29-96 Analyzed: 04-29-96 Reported: 05-01-96 Sample Description: Air VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION tEPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 96040657 E-1S 2,500 4.4 16 15 120 96040658 E-1D 2,800 8.6 41 24 150 '040659 E-2 160 N.D. 0.8 0.9 4.0 6040660 E-3 3,500 5.3 27 20 107 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~ 7'/r7~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director Total Number of Samples Shipped: J./- Shipper's Signature:-7Z - - _ Signature {',¿t.I/~ ( ,.. ^ A~. A _ I . - - Remarks ~ - ~ - 't.... ..,... -- -- . Page / of. c.. Project Name: /\ fA 1/ Y () I ( / Project No.: 92 - /. 'I :). SiteLocatiOn:~k·el("<:;PiI'=L-0 C A Date: q 1..ldL.J~ Sample Type Depth I ~ ~ Water Solid :.. 'II£.. r,~ ~ If- - I ~ ~ T + - ¡vot:¡ .t. W -t - l'¡/~ v . Ship To: n:f?A A/Cé r:',.<¡ <: r-j!J,.¡{:¡t.. Aun: ¡::2:;2. A ¿ð// .A /--. ..... A A/ t £-15 £" -jÐ ~ £-,3 '" Sample No. - - BoringIWel No. ('1/ (.-¿;:;;t:l:{ Time /0. ~O ID ~3 ^ Date £1 ~~/( $76 4- Z5,-(ì¿' ^ Company "AlA Þ -s:: ~ ç:: ¡I11 b ~ yo --'< IV Ó c....~ RelinQuished bJ, ~ Received bY~ ~ -e Relinquished by: Received by: Relinquished by: ./ o ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENT AL'SOLUTIONS, INC. 21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive Irvine, Calüomia 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 .,.'" . "'1 Received by: ~ SpcciallnstrUctions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements: o ENVlRONMENTALSOLUTIONS,INC. 0 ENVlRONMENTALSOLUTIONS,INC. 1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 281S Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Petaluma, Calüomia 949S4 Walnut Creek, Calüomia 94S98 ,'" . The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis anellor treatability evaluation and remain the property or the client and not Environmental SoIutloos, Ioe:. At the conclusion or the test work, all remaining materlal(s) will be returned to the client ror eventual disposal at a licensed radlity. · . ... ... ..... ... -- -- -- ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 !. Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom Witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020 Sample Description: Air sampled : 03-19-96 Received: 03-20-96 Analyzed: 03-20-96 Reported: 03-26-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7241 VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 96030312 E-1S 1,000 4.0 15 12 79 96030313 E-1D 2,000 7.5 41 21 120 .30314 E-2 580 N.D. 2.9 3.4 17 96030315 E-3 2,200 5.9 33 18 110 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~r/7:~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD . '. . [ of, [ Name: NA 1.1'/ (-::'''' No.: 9 2 - J. q 'J Site Location: /? '" L' I'-',' " I.ï ¡:-l.f) Page, Project Project . Ship To: ~.AA.'/:.r- (/>A<:r AJJ....ln(~L.. AUn: M/o,,¿ AJ,.,~ -"_'>.1 " Remarks v (... v (.A Date: . ? 1~---2L ~ '... Vol. I,._ L!:.~ Il. I II.- , !I~ v v V ~ Other ÇAS \~ Sam Ie T Water Solid Time /fJ.5 w2. !J.32.. '(3 Q Date ;/f9h~1 I Depth Sample No. Boring/Wel No. F-"-'S" £'-/// £-2- £-3 rH::-' -I - 4 Time q. "(2 372J ¡q(., 9 :~;J C¡ YV\ ENVIRO~ME~T AL SOLUTIONS, INC. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Date ?/2¥~r:. r LAT" [jð' / I~"'-/") Company S'<::> (r"') (' f)~-¡ t:J C' I Æ /"},,//r.r'~--7,."'1./)P."'\ 1£,- /~ Shipper's Signature~ Signature ~ Total Number of Samples Shipped: RelinQuished by=-- ./ ¿._ Rcceived by: Relinquished by: Rcceived by: Relinquished by: Received by: ( .. "^J'_'¥~~ ~--<r)7A''('19/\ SpcciallnslIUctions I Shipm'ent I dlingl Storag \ Requirements: í2.£ ;::-v'- 0' -r ú -röI""Î (J, i7 t:::. I <: ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 2815 Mitchell Drive. Suite 103 Walnut Creek I California 94598 D The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property ofthe client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the t~st work, all rernainingmaterial(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licenséd facility. . . ~... .... .... -- -- .-- ORANGECOASTANALYTICAL,IN~ 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 . Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Tom Witte 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project I: 92-247 Analysis Method: EPA 8015m / 8020 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 7172 Sampled : 02-28-96 Received: 02-29-96 Analyzed: 03-01-96 Reported: 03-04-96 Sample Description: Air VOLATILE FUEL HYDROCARBONS WITH BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 8015m/8020) Laboratory Client Volatile Fuel Ethyl Total Sample Sample Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Number Number (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 96020410 E-1S 1,500 6.3 35 25 160 96020411 E-D 3,300 13 91 55 290 .020412 E-2 720 N.D. 6.3 10 53 96020413 E-3 2,200 9.6 61 39 200 Detection Limit: 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Volatile Fuel Hydrocarbons are quantitated against a Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C6 to C14. N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. gasoline standard. Analytes reported as ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director . CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD , ! , - , u ~....:.... , Sitc Local )n: /. .. I: ! I" ¡ ,.::.: Datc: :. I~~ ~~ Water! S< id I Other :: II~, . '" -:,' 1./ of N¡ ne: No. Page, Project Project ~,\.. l~. { ï , ". , A ¡ i , '.;; :i ( . Ship To: 0 L ;, /'J Attn: /¡ i.. ,/ , , Remarks , Vol. -::¡".. , L. ~ " I ~~. o e u \.:) ;,. ... ,.,. ¡ Time ¡).;o ,- r: ..} -' .'... I ) L J I I . Date """ ~. .. .;.. - .:,." Depth Sample No. 1:- "." ~ f-7) t:--¿ f_~ - .~1 Boring/Wel No. Time /000 I D : Où :::. "- ~ Date 2.. / ~ '1/1 h <:. rl _ ') '¿- c v -:Ii ," v V Company ,/r-..' "':'u/I"f-t . {. ~",X-~. , \ '" 1\ -r--. , I - ?l. . ~, C !.. Total Number of Samples Shipped: ± Shipper's Signature:'--:r ,./. .'" Signature 1=,- Relinquished bv~ /,~ , . ( j .d-I:t :- I Received by: . 1'\" - ,J (!~ \C r, ^ ~ - 0 Relinquished by: Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Special InstrUctions / Shipment / Handling! Storage Requirements: 1 ,.1 -, ì 5 () r Î I ,ç INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 ~ o .' .)-~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, ÏNC. 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 ' Walnut Creek, California 94598 J ~ The máterial(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property of the client and not Environmental Solutions, Inc. At the conclusion of the test work, all remaininl! material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility. . . . c --I ro.. Rec;<:lable and made /rom "'c;<:led paper. {ð¢9 ,. I . ATTACHMENT D SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS I. I. ,~~~~~""'-~~-,~-""""" i , ¡ ---L ¡ t I . . I i Step 4: Calculate Pounds ofi VOCs Destroyed _ ! per Day (VOCd Where: I I I I VOCd =IWc «60minJhr) 24hr/day) (Ave Flow Rate] I (90 ]b/mole»/l ¡JOOOOO (379 cu ftllb mole) 1 i I VOCd Dec9~ 2]] iIibs. per day I 1 ¡ ¡ VOCd Jan 95=1 44711 bs. per day I ¡ I , VOCd Feb 95=iAve of January ¡Jd March -(447 + 2]0)n- 1328 ]bs per day I VOCd Mar9509 21011 bs. per day I 1 i I VOCd Apr95 ~ 7811 bs. per day ¡ I ' , , , , VOCd May95 j 146!1 bs. per day I I ì : I ' , VOCd June 951 1481 bs. per day I : : I VOC<!.July95~__135l bs.perday i , , ! . i 95! bs. per day I_ i I 2 i71I bs. per day i t L I I TIK EJ L____ 1_ SolutioiJs IlIc. ~s. per day 1731 ]~bs. per day 1651 bs. per day I I ] 65iI.bs. per day 116[lj..bs. per day II ï87tLbs. per day ,/ 1591I;..b~ per day II 9011~bs. per day , ! VOCd Aug. 9~ , I VOCd Sept. 95 ì VOCd Oct. 95 [ I VOCd Nov. 9~ I VOCd Dec. 951 I I ¡ t IDee. Total I I IJan. Total = I I 4Feb Total = ::r Mar. Total = [248.6 ~ 9~ """"T I %T ¡ ~ ! I T f T t t I 1 VOCd Feb. VOCd Mar. VOCd AI>r, VOCd May VOCd June ( l I [ i J. -1 -1 .1 1 -1 = 1]66 F :Ë , -+158 ¡ k , i ï L 1203.5 r :c i I jï76 1- 240 I i ; E-3 30 30 30 54 '--35 44.5 24 25 2š 32 32 35 37 39 36 40 37 ¡ + T "i I T T T T .L 1- 1 + Ì t T 1 1 i f , I f í I i , I ; 1 1 1 Step 2: Input Flow Rates from Weekly Monitoring I I I - , , I i I ¡ I Flow Rate - CFM I ¡ E-ID I E-2 Dec. 5. ]994 I t 48 t 33 Dec. 30, 1994 I 48 33 Ave. Dec. ]9941 I 48 T 33 I I I Jan. ]7. ]995 I I 68 I 34 Ave.Janl995 i l 68 1 34 I I I Feb. 2. ]995 ' ï 50 I 27 Feb. 16. 1995 I ¡ 50 T 28 Ave Feb. ]995 i i 50 T 28 ~ ¡ T Mar. 3, ]995 + Mar.8.1995 i T Mar. 15. 1995 ¡ :t Mar. 2],1995 I 1 Mar. 29, 1995 i I Ave Mar.] 995 I I I I Apr. 13, 1995 i T Apr. 23. ]995 I Ave. Apr. ]995 + T , T i I i t i t .L ; 1- i T t I I T Pounds of VOCs Destroyed By Thermal Oxidizer Former Navy Oil Company Lease Sitej 1433 Union A venue, Bakersfield, California i -- r : ! ¡ - r · f i I I t , ~ i 1 l Step 3: Calculate Weigh, (Wc) of Hydrocarbons in Flow To Thermal Oxidizer I I ILL I I WC=!(TPH * Flow E-]S) + (TPH * Flow E-]D) + (TP, H * Flow E-~ + (TPH*Flow E-3)/Ave Flow For Month T 1 T I ¡ I We Dec. 94=1 3725lppmv +- We Jan. 95 = 6]9Blppmv + We Feb. 95 - No bag Samples Collected 1- We Mar. 95 - 2472 I ppmv t' We Apr. 95 = 1120 ppmv We May 95= 24li)ppmv T WcJune95- 1809ppmv We July 95 = ]545 ppmv We Aug. 95 = ]268 ppmv We Sept. 95 = 2435 ppmv We Oct. 95- ]OB2ppmv We Nov. 95 = 2019 ppmv WcDec.95-1 ]929ppmv We Jan. 96 = ,No Samples Collected We Feb. 96= ]925ppmv We Mar. 96= 1362ppmv We Apr. 96= 2]85 ppmv We May. 96= 1855 ppmv We June 96= 1058 pl'.mv , I "'t I 36 32 40 38 43 38 35 50 42.5 E-IS 55 55 55 --é 74 _____1--. 78 ---L 96 --.L 83 ----L. 94 ---1- 85 ¡ -;¡o 77 77 87 80 99 83 93 88 74 43 58.5 52 55 53 , i l , J j , I Effluent TPI!- ppmv (EP~ 8015) Bag Samples E·15 t E-lD l E-2 -+- E-3 ± 5700 1~.1... 650 3000 i 1800 I 9000 t 3800 Î 1600 :+: 4500 ~ 1600 I 440 I 1800 ¡ 1500 i 2100 ¡ 3700 t 1300 I 1900 2000 T 1300 I 560 , 2800 I 1200 I 1200 I 1400 1 3500 1 800 1. 4000 i 1500 f 410 : 1300 t 2700 t 380 ! 1800 i 3100 i 460 i 1900 I 3300 I 720 I 2200 1. 2000 1 580 1 2200 1 2800 ¡ 160 l 3500 1 2500 ¡ 290 l 2500 i 1100 : 540 i 1600 --- t . 1 1 ! , , i ! i 5400 9800 7ïõ 620 2600 2100 1600 1300 1900 1100 2600 2000 1500 1000 2500 2100 1100 , Dec. 1994 Jan. 1995 Mar. 1995 Apr. 1995 May. 1995 June. 1995 July. 1995 Aug. 1995 Sept. 1995 Oct. 1995 Nov. 1995 Dec. 1995 996 1996 1996 1 Feb. 1996 Mar. 1996 Apr. May. June. Step 255 220 260 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Apr. Total= May.Total= ì ¡June. Total= iJuly. Total= August Total= June Tota]= l i ¡ [sept. Total= I Oct. Total= I INov. Total= I IDee. Total= I ~Feb. Total= !Mar. Total= I [Apr. Total= May Tota]- 51 39 42 44 38.6 46 40.3 44.6 64 51 51 46 39 57 25 25 , ¡ ; t i f ¡ I I I I I I I ¡ j ! I 45 42 43 43.3 61.8 60 61.6 70.5 64 69 60 60 60 68 71 71 I 1 I t 46 58 5] 58 51 53.3 1 73.8 81.3 85.] 80 74 63 66 57 69 80 72 82 Page ! i i 32 I 34 i 40 I 35.3 ! 51 I I July. 25. 1995 57 I I IAug. 28, ] 995 48 I i Sept. 28, ] 995 69 I , I ¡ Nov. 2, ]995 I 85 J Nov. 30, ]995 I 85 Dec. 14, ]995 I ì 72 1 Feb. 28. ]996 67 I I Mar 19. 1996 67.1 Apr 26, ]996 62.8 1 May 22. 1996 62.5 I ~un.28, 1996 62 T I ì j t t I i i i ¡ i too Concentration f I l · ·