The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK ~ '.'. D. S. NEEDHAM " , ":7::H' .~¡. -..'.:J)" ;lrt)}~ tv- c II ~ ~ 1/ d' ~ ~ c> ..¡ á ('1/ ' FIRE CHIEF "~:,,~".": ' \.:,~' .~'O::>~~;i';~:i (, '. " <. .:., ',.."" '",;, ."...:"~''':_ OR ',-:..';;þ'{:;;~~,~j ¡ ~ ;I ¡.~ '^ "J(' 7,1)/ /'0 X , '. -r~~';::;¡ ?' 'Î'<ø tl .¡ If... Sd'tA I ç Pr? " April 29, '1986 O:~>" '.: . _. 1'5 v / J( a< ç, I ( :t: r;l ~/~i-'{,; -" . - 'W / /1 C C iO i{ (' /I !) . L&ð/( ~fV--) 0ù r~cS_ { / ~~ o/~otf /o/ðl'g-=.. (~.!(!-~--_.._-, -.... ." .. . "'~'~' , , , , Mr..J.R. Merritt; Superintendent Santa Fe Railroad PO Box 1947 ."" Fresno, CA 93ii8 .. , ' /@/7/<?1 Dear Mr. Merritt: . ~/ -'.. -w-~-_,__~/ ' " _ . .; r:;- . .. .. , . , , · · It 'is my understanding that the property located at 1531 Union Ave., Bakersfield, CA, belongs to the Santa Fe Railway. On this property are 'one or more underground fuel storage tanks; the size of ,the tanks is unknown. Also, there are numerous aboveground storage tanks. , I want to tnake you aware that if the tanks are ¡abandoned fora period of 90 days, they are t~ be tested in a manner approved by "itheFire Chief; also, if the tanks are abandoned fora period of one ,year, they " have to be removed. This is per Uniform F1re Code 79.113(d), Uniform F~re Code ,:'. 79.113(e) and the Bakersfield Municipal Code 15.64.340.. .....- I I would appreciate action on this matter. If you h,ave any questions; please, " contact me at (805) 326-3951"Monday ~hru Friday,·8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. . Yours truly, 'Q. -~~í2M \, . ..ð J.R. Embry;: Captain Fire Safety Control JRE/d 7 d ¿' ú I- k"h- 0 CA./ 7t' /-4f :t J- 71 p t' ~/,. ?' °4 "LV 4-' t:;- /-- ./ ~ tv / / 1 :l-ir "..> ¡ V jJ d' 4' '/-~7 , -.-. , , .... -'" -. .- '.., .... -, " - ---'. .' '':'.:... . " , '- ~/~<r:~L;ý:;ci"r Ii . -.. 1"J ~~~',: _ ", ' "e "The Atchison, TopekWnd S~nta Fe Railway C9mp.~ ' , ...~ .' .. , " ',One Santa r. Plaaa, 5200~,., Shei la St., Loa Angeles, CA,~90040 213/267-5227 August 26, 1986 Filet 11000624-26 .' , < ' PERSONAL ('crr/ f ~/- / 0 l~'tJl( ,Jj? ÇJ-¿Li 37/ -c<'Jc¡s<ge' \. \ Mr. Olson, Chairman of the Board Navy Oil Company, Inc. , , P. O. Box 752 Bakersfield, CA ,93302 Dear Mr. Ole on: ¡, . ..... Please refer to your, Company'" lease agreement with the Santa Fe,identified as Contract No. 152752 dated October 1,1976 covering leale of .,44,850 .q.-£t. parcel of our property .t'Bakersfield, California which you are utilizing as a , ,site for your bulk oil distribution plant, which 8Íte contains your Le88ee- içw~ed improvements, consisting of assorted valves, underground tanks, vents, and drains throughout the lease.ite. , , Our letter of April 24, 1985 addressed to you, was the relult o~ your' telephone advice to Mr. Tyson of my office on Apri 123, 1955,to the effect that your Company was requesting t~rmination of your track cOntract agreement with the Santa Fe, Contract·No. 44633, and your advice that your Company would continue to maintain Lease Contract No. 152752 in effect. - This telephone advice was given to Mr. Tyson as a result of øurprior letter of April 17, 1985 addressed to your Vice President, Mr. David Alexander, relative to your Mr. Alex~ndèr'8 prior telephone advice to Mr. Tylonin connection with your Compa,ny':s prior intent to auign all interest ip these .two Contract Agreeœent8toBeaconOil Company, which ~ran.action never transpired per y~~r subsequent April 24, 1985 telephone advice. Attached is copy of self-explanatory letter of Apri 1 29, 1986 from the Cit)' of Bakersfield relative to your Cofupany'a Leuee-owned storage tank.8 on our property at Bakerafield, sit~ covered by Contract No. ,152752.' - .. Please immediately furnÍ8hthe ,undenigned written confirmation th.t your Company i. not in Violation of Uniform Fire Codes 79.l13(d) and 19.113{e), and Bakersfield Municipal Code 15.64.340. Aho, your Company is current 1y ,in violation of the terms of this Leaae by , remaining delinquent in monthly rental payments of $470 each from April 1,' 1986 to dat... ,Please arrange for immediate payment of aU delinquent rentals . '\ \ , , . ('."fa J'. '''''''n.'~i.. r'nmn",nv .< ~i;.. , e >~ .. ,', ,./ t4r. Ohon August 26, 1986 Pa,e Two lile: 11000624-26 " , , , ., - ~ - Please aho adviu: preciae cont~nt of aachof your atorage tsnks. number of tanks, etc. \.: In view of your poasible violation of the, above Codes, we will require your written advice in connection with your meeting theae Codes, within 30 day. ' from d-.te of this letter. Please furnish copy of this written advice to thè City of, Bakersfield' I Captain of Fire Safety Control, Mr. J. 'It. Embry, at the address iridicated below. tOUT personai attention to this matter is requested. Thank you. If you have any questions, or need further assist,nce involving thia lubjèei matter, pleDse contact ~ayne Ty..~n at the'.bove telephone number, citin£ the file number indicatec above. Very truly yours, ~~ ~ .'; Q. ~. Torpin, General Manager , , ~oi ~ed bv~. T't"8Øn By tt. E. Tyson -Contract Specialist' Attachlllent tc: Hr. David Alexander, Vice Preiident ~avy Oil Company P. O. Box 752 Bakersfield, CA 93302 ~Mr. J. R. Embry, CaPt~in Fire Safety Control .. . City of Bakersfield 2101 H Street Bakersifled. CA 93301 '\ \ K~r~ çounty Health Department DIvISIon of Environmental HeaJii' 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfi~ ~ 93305 Permi t No. Appl ication . . ,/69./? , / s=: J-S' APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORN;E FACILITY ~ of Application (checK): DNew Facility Or-Ddification of Facility Ii!Existio;j C1;/ Type of Business (c k) : Gaso me Statlon Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? D es 2No Is Tank(s) Used primarily for þ¡gricultural Purposes? DYes 1&1 No /) 4 ./ Facility Address 15'3/~' ~. Nearest Cross St. ~' ~: T R SEC (Rural Locations cnly) /"") ./ __ ,...... // Owner Contact Person~ ~ Address Z p Teleph~~ Operator Contact Perso Address ð ' 7 'J ~c. Z P 93:7 8:5 T~n - B. Water to Facility Provided by (?J~~ De~th to· Groundwater~ Soil Characteristics at Facility _ ~I ~ . _ Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Detenn nat óns ' {VIA of Ownership , 3c)S-93Ø A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area Facility Name 6 CA Contractor's License No. Zip Telephone Proposed Completion Date Insurer C. Contractor Address Proposed Starting Date WOrker's Compensation Certification I D. '1)fJ, t'J; ~ () tL E. Store (check all t apply) : - .,..-. waste product Motor Vehicle Unleaded Regular premium Diesel Waste Fuel Oil I D 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 B B 0 0 0 0 0 F. Chemical eamposition of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fuels) Tank t Chemical Stored (non-cOl'llllercial name) CAS I (if known) Chemical previously Stored / ~..~~~jJ~i~rent) G. Transfer of OwnershiQ /'" ~ ~.d ð Date.of Tran~f~r ;z-~~~ .~evious Owner:.2:2'~ ~ ~ PrevIous FacllIty Name ' ~ I, accept fully all öbJigations of Permit No. issued to I understand that the Pennitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfe5 of the Permit to Operate this underground storage facility upon receiving this completed fonn. This fonn has been completed under penal ty of ::::~ ~ ' per;ury and to the best of my knowledge is Titld~ DateA'h~ Facil i ty Name ~7(~~- pennit TANK 3 e (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM F_EAŒ TANK) -FOR EACH SEcTIõN, CHECK ALL APPRõPRÏÄTE"BõXEŠ-- -- No. H. 1. Tank is: DVau1ted DNon-Vaulted ~uble-Wall DSingle-wall 2. Tank Material gCarbon Steel D Stainless Steel D Polyvinyl Chloride D Fiberglass-<:lad Steel o Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic D Concrete D AlLminum D Bronze DUnkoown [] Other (describe) Primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) 3. 9. 4. Tank Secondary Containment DDouble-Wa11-r:J Synthetic Liner DOther (describe): DMaterial Thickness (Inches) Tank Interior Lining , -oRubber D 1ùkyd-~EIx>xy DPhenolic DGlass DClay Dl1'1lined Dl1'1kno\1l1 DOther (describe): -" , ' Tank Corrosion Protection -UGalvanized DFiberglass-Clad DPolyethylene Wrap DVinyl Wrappi~ ~ar or Asphalt DUnknown DNone DOther (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~ne DImpressed OJrrent System 0 Sacrificial Anode System Descrite System & Equipnent: 7. Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception . a. Tank: DVisual (vaulted tanks only) LfGrouOOwater Monitorirg well (s) D Vadose Zone Monitori~ WeI1(s) D U-Tube Without Liner DU-Tube with Compatible Liner Directi~ Flow to Monitoring well(s)* D Vapor Detector* D Liquid Level Sensor D Condoctivit;( Sensor* D Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank o Liquid Retrieval & Inspection From U-Tube, Moni toriD;J well or Annular Space QlDaily Gaugi~ & Inventory Reconciliation 0 Periodic Tightness Testi~ o None 0 Unknown 0 Other b. PipiD;J: 0 Flow-Restricting Leak Detector (s) for pressuri zed PipiJ'~· D Moni toriD;J Sump wi th Raceway 0 Sealed Concrete Raceway DHalf-cut Compatible Pipe Raceway D Synthetic Liner Raceway DNone ~nknown 0 Other *6escribe Make & Model: 8. ~nk4igh~~SBe s 1S en Tightness Tested? DYes DNa Mlnknown Date of Last Tightness Test Resul ~--Test Test Name Testing Canpany Tank Repair Tank Repaired? DYes ~ DUnknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs OVerfill Protection ~ator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level DTape Float Gauge DFloat Vent Valves 0 Auto Shut- Off Controls BCapacitance Sensor Dsealed Fill Box DNone Dunknown Other: List Make & Model For Above Devices C~city (Gallons) aoo o Lined Vaul t D None .;a:onknown Manufacturer: Capacity Manufacturer (Gals. ) _.~- 5. 6. 10. 11. Piping a. underground PipiD;J: DYes DNa ~known Material Thickness (inches) Diame~ Manufacturer DPressure OSuction éJt;ravi ty 'Approximate Length of Pipe Rœ b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : DGalvanized DFiberglass-Clad Ormpressed CUrrent DSacrificial Anode DPolyethylene Wrap DElectrical Isolation DVinyl Wrap DTar or Asphalt ~nknown DNone DOther (describe): c. Underground Piping, Secondary Containnent: DDouble-wall OSynthetic Liner System ~ne DUnknown r-Ina...L _ __ , 3 _ _ .!, , Facility Name Ø"7 (ß~ ~ Permit No. TANK ~ e (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM FLæ TANK) - roR EACH SEcTIõN, CHECK ALL APPRõPRÏÃTE 'BõXEŠ-- H. 1. Tank is: DVaulted DNon-vaulted ~I:k>Uble-Wal1 DSingle-Wall 2. Tank Material -Scarbon Steel 0 Stainless Steel 0 Polyvinyl Chloride 0 Fiberglass-<:lad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic 0 Concrete 0 Alllnim.rn D Bronze DUnknown Other (describe) primary Containment Date Installed Thickness (Inches) 3. 10. 4. Tank Secondary Containment o Double-Wall-r:J Synthetic Liner DOther (describe): DMaterial 5. Tank Interior Lining -¡:jRubber 0 Alkyd )S'Epoxy DPhenolic DGlass DClay Ot11lined Ot11kno\1l1 DOther (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protection []Galvanized [JFiberglass-Clad DPolyethylene wrap DVinyl wrapping ril'Tar or Asphalt DUnknown DNone DOther (describe): . Cathodic Protection: AšlNone DImpressed OJrrent System D Sacrificial Anode System Describe System & Equipnent: Leak Detection, Monitoring, and Interception ~Tank: OVisual (vaulted tanks only) [jGroumwater Monitorin:i Well(s) OVadose Zone MonitoriD:j Well(s) Du-Tube Without Liner o U-Tube with Canpatible Liner Directi~ Flow to Monitorirg Well(s) * o Vapor Detector* 0 Liquid Level Sensor 0 Condœti vi t~ Sensor* D Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of I:k>uble Wall Tank D Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fran U-Tube, Moni toriD:j well or Armular Space BDaily GalXJing & Imentory Reconciliation ¡Ð Periodic Tightness Testing D None 0 UnknO\1l1 0 Other b. Piping: OFlow-Restrictirg Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping- o Moni toriI'¥] S\Dp wi th Raceway 0 Sealed Concrete Raceway OHalf-cut Canpatible Pipe Raceway 0 Synthetic Liner Raceway DNone jSlUnkno\1l1 0 Other . *Describe Make & Model: 8. :nk4igh~~SBe ~ s 1S en Tightness Tested? DYes DNa known Date of Last Tightness Test Results 0 Test Test Name - ' Testing Canpany 9. Tank Repair Tank Repai red? D Yes ~ Ounknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Describe Repairs OVerfill Protection ~ator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level DTape Float GalXJe DFloat Vent Valves D Auto Shut- Off Controls DCapacitance Sensor Dsealed Fill Box DNone DUnknown DOther: List Make & Model For Above Devices Ca~city (Gallons) l:; t:JO Ò D Lined Vault 0 None BUnkno\1l1 Manufacturer: Capacity Manufacturer Thickness (Inches) (Gals.) -'- 7. 11. Piping , a. lJndergrolU1d PipiD:J: DYes ONo 'SIúnknown Material Thickness (inches) Diame~ ' Manufacturer' DPressure DSuction [)Gravity Approximate LeD:Jth of Pipe R1n b. Underground Pipirg Corrosion Protection : DGalvanized DFiberglass-<:lad DImpressed CUrrent DSacrificial Anode DPolyethylene Wrap DElectrical Isolation Dvinyl Wrap DTar or Asphalt J;3(Jnknown o None DOther (describe): c. 1Underground Piping, Secondary Containment: DDouble-Wall DSynthetic Liner System ~None DUnknown ..... -. . Facility Name ~~ ~ ,r~ Permit No. TANK # 4IÞ (FILL OUT SEPARATE FORM F~~CH TANK) -FOR EACH SEcTÏÕÑ, CHECK ALL APPRõPROOEI3õXES- i H. 1. Tank is: OVaulted ONon-Vaulted ~uble-Wall DSingle-wall 2. Tank Material ~arbon Steel 0 Stainless Steel 0 Polyvinyl Chloride 0 Fiberglass~lad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic 0 Concrete 0 AlLrninum 0 Bronze DUnknown Other (describe) Primary Containment rate Installed 'n1ickness (Inches) 3. 10. 4. Tank Secondary Contaiment o Double-Wall-rJ Synthetic Liner [JOther (describe): o Material Thickness (Inches) 5. Tank Interior Lining DRubber DA1kyd-~xy DPhenolic DGlass DClay Dlblined Dlbknown DOther (describe(:~ - . 6. Tank Corrosion Protection ~Galvanized [JFiberglass-Clad DPOlyethylene Wrap DVinyl wrapping .BTar or Asphalt ~known DNone DOther (describe): . éathOOic protection:. ne DImpressed OJrrent System D Sacrificial Anode System Describe System Equipnent: 7. ~ Detection, Monitoring, and Interception . a. Tank: DVisual (vaulted tanks only) LrGrourrlwater Monitorin:j Well (s) o Vadose Zone Monitoring Well(s) 0 U-Tube Without Liner DU-Tube with Campatible Liner Directi~ Flow to Monitoring Well(s)* o Vapor Detector· 0 Liquid Level Sensor 0 Conductivit:t Sensor· o Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall Tank o Liquid Retrieval & Inspection Fram U-Tube, Monitoring Well or Annular Space HDaily Ga~ing & Inventory Reconciliation 0 Periodic Tightness Testing o None 0 Unknown 0 Other b. Pipi03: [JFlow-Restricti03 Leak Detector(s) for Pressurized Piping- o Moni toring SlDp wi th Raceway 0 Sealed Concrete Raceway !Half-cut Campatible Pipe Raceway 0 Synthetic Liner Raceway 0 None Unknown 0 other · scr ibe Make & Model: - 8. ~nk4igh~~SBe s 1S en Tightness Tested? DYes ONo ~unknown Date of Last Tightness Test Resul (s ~f Test Test Name ' Testing Campany 9. Tank Repair Tank Repaired? DYes ~ Dunknown Date(s) of Repair(s) Descriœ,Repairs Overfill Protection ~rator Fills, Controls, & Visually Monitors Level /'[JTåpe Float Ga~e DFloat Vent Valves D Auto Shut- Off Controls DCapacitance Sensor DSealed Fill Box DNane DUnknown DOther: List Make & Model For Above Devices ca~ci ty (Gallons) OOÒ ,. o Lined Vaul t 0 None ~Unknown Manufacturer: Capacity Manufacturer (Gals. ) -'- 11. Piping , a. underground Piping: DYes DNa ~known Mater ial Thickness (inches) Diamet~' Manufacturer DPressure DSuction [Jt;ravi ty 'Approximate Le~th of Pipe RLn b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : OGalvanized DFiberglass~lad OImpressed CUrrent DSacrificial Anode DPolyethylene Wrap DElectrical Isolation Dvinyl Wrap DTar or Asphalt DUnknown o None DOther (describe): c. UndergrouOO Piping, Secondary Contairrnent: . g~~l~all .~~thetic Liner System ~ne OUnknown - -: . - ..~~~ ~ _.~ ~_~ .--t~:":.~ ~~, :. ":'-~ .,.- -t '" . -._:~,:~~~,-~.":;:',;;~:-~'.;". ':. . . Æ¿: '¡;~i ". ?"IZ'~íf7';':, :µúr; Çplit(f ~~r:jl;;~~~ (1fcL(1$~1;~~,~ ~ t ~ ";.. ,-, /:\-......:...:. ,,-:,,-..' '~;;..'~' ... '~'.' '. . .' ,i.;- .~. " \. ..... "'.,. :' .:."r:~'- ".-~~',"~-~ .~~'~(;':;:':::. ~'~~·,:,:>r..:. " 'h7s. ':" (),..,r)~~j;i}Jr:Ji/2.~ J~~'remeinbe--\J5i:Ýhç1l7jnq - :.~¿;; "'~ ' ,'" ~~3;/";::;i/'.·..'~ ~'~., . /:'_" "" '~':' '" ~r.;" ,. ',:"";';;..:':~,~~;",:' )':-¿. ::;:¿,~i:.i,fi~1~~;,\~:i:,--(. "." ......." ,:. aibou+""\Jh, s" l1eitJj a... '·:Sfe'tfe.(]a:&e ,.', ""'¡(.';,'; "'.."".<.,;,.t,¡' "'i;':>,,~, . " '·f r-' , ~]", -j"l~ 7. .J;.~ ," "'ê '.,>';r.....~<~, : I f''''-()Üc~\ \ (", f"¡';¡'t..,)C) 0 {j'1' e ~",:'; ''i, . ,. (" 0 t.,' -;:;.. <,.,~;_;~¡ -'~ - ,:'I' ," . ~:"-'í" ,~ ... .~ 'J>' ._.....-. _~~ "' . .' ':, ',~'., :'1 .".---.,.---,-, -,- ' - ---.--.--~.-----_.-. >, ....----..-;..-·---ï~ 7,'=·gS ;.." ~'::--- -A://1- ~§... -11·--- ------¡pJ-~-- '-~--- --:"':"'---" 1'~---~:-~'~~<' (j/~-, --., "~-,_.._--"'-»--_...._-, , - ----- .-- --j------ ~ -- ~... -- _.~ ----_. ,-,-,..,--,.---,,,-- '¡----------~~--- L:a-£--- , ~ ~ //r , I - I· ' " , .L::Þ ,-.- .. II . . j A' ! H___~-:-..--- c2¡ ~ ¿z..¡-d .=~_~~=~-~~-~; ¿ 9~ - /62fC/ I II' ' -·-----..---,..·tJi" , ---~--:-~ t· ..' _ _ 'm..~~..__. _ __"___.__~~ Iii ' !¡ . - .---.,....- 'T'- -'"'' ____"u'"____, <II ~ ; ':¡ -.. --------.--- ---...........--.---...-----..-.. ,'1 ;:i ¡ ! -. '. :: ~: ',~,' '.~ ::/:, . '. . ", ~". 'I ...... - -- - , ' .._--- --'---'-~'-'--~--' --..- ------_.. I:; [ I ~ : t . --" 'ilr---''''·'·'--· .. -,... ¡¡¡ ,:I _:.;.. n' _____n_. __ '" .. -_. - . ". ... . -' -..-. - -.--........ - __u _ __n. I,; - -~'~r-- ---. j!! - -..-.------. ~ ¡ ._ __.__ ___o...~ -- , ~-----_.__., 1,1 ._- - "--..--.---..- --~....-----. ¡ :! - .------- --.. :!.:.-- -.-..- - ---- ._,-_.~._. i': -- - -- --- - -_.~.-- - - .. , , .--- - n" '-'-'-' .--t: ¡-',. -- - - __'.no . .. ) L7,~~«<ö1 M ! i I I ¡ ,- 1/-1 -f6 ~ Cfr~ µ---J,~ ;4 1,/ (!1~1 s~ /D J/~ /J1<-uJ,2J ¥ l-"-V'~ ,-j ~ ~, ~~-f 4 ~-t ~r Ç¡ åù1f 0, I (1) ~ ~ ~ ~~Ir'A3 ¡V-" I'';). I1:- o.ffu . <Jt sole. f ~ F'fA~ ~.Q/vLð P. rAw{'" -h, µr>tw.( ~ I 6:u~/t.- ~ ~-A ~~~ ~ AJmAA/J (J~+ l 9ô'-1: k O~ -.... ",q--~/ . õ7l ,/ / -14 -.Bt__ u.d--Io~ .-- -'s¡ 1'-/1I)~j"_u" ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SAICES DEPARTMENT -RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AGENCY STEVE McCALLE~ R.E.H.S., Director 2700 "M" STREET, SUITE 300 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301-2370 Voice: (661) 862-8700 Fax: (661) 862-8701 TTY Relay: (800) 735-2929 e-mail: eh@Co.kern.ca.us DAVID PRICE III, RMA DIRECTOR Community Development Program Department Engineering & Survey Services Department Environmental Health Services Department Planning Department Roads Department January 3, 2000 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION Mr. Mick Hardin Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company (BNS&F) 740East Carnagie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CASE Location: 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, Kern County, CA Known As: Former Navy Oil Company Lease Site Permit #: 150057 Dear Mr. Hardin: This letter confirms the completion of a site investigation and corrective action for the underground storage tank(s) formerly located at the above-described location. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tank(s) are greatly appreciated. Based on information in the above-referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank(s) site is in compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.77 of the Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release(s) at the site is required. This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code. Please contact our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Steve McCalley, Director Environmental Health Services D cc: file CVRWQCB - Bruce Myers State Board, Underground Tank Program ent COLTclol.wpd ;, , - tit TIIC January 11,2000 Project No. 92-247 Ms. April West Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 810 1 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Final Semiannual Monitoring Report July through December 1999 with Request to Rescind Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 The Burlington Northern and Sánta Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California Dear Ms. West: This letter is submitted on behalf of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) and summarizes the effluent monitoring results for July through December 1999 for the discharge to the industrial sewer located at the BNSF site at 1433 Union A venue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (lWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. This letter is also a request to rescind IWD Permit No. 2-BK-0020. As we have recently discussed, pumping has been completed at this site and the pumping system was shut off in December 1999. BNSF is planning to remove the equipment, including the ground water monitoring well, within the next few weeks. The sewer connection will be properly sealed per requirements of the City of Bakersfield Plumbing and Mechanical Department at that time. As a result, discharge into the sewer, other than minor miscellaneous water that may be generated during cleanup and removal of the system, is no longer required. We anticipate removal of the equipment before the end of February, 2000 and request the IWD Permit be rescinded as of February 29, 2000. Pursuant to the IWD Permit, samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis and were collected on November 1, 1999. Additionally, headspace inside the temporary holding tank is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit (LEL). The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1. The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below: · The total volume of ground water discharged from July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 was 4,026 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 22 gallons (0.000022 million gallons per day [mgd]), well below the permitted flow of 0.001 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank was not detected each month. · As shown in Table 1, the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc, 21 Technology Drive · Irvine, California 92618 Telephone l1li727-9336 · Fax ""27-7399 949 949 Customer-Focused Solutions @ ¡, e e Ms. April West January 11,2000 Page 2 Since the pumping has been shut off and there is no discharge to the sewer, no further monitoring will be conducted. Should discharge to the sewer be necessary in the future, a new application will be submitted at that time. Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the infonnation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the infonnation, the infonnation submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false infonnation, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." If you have any questions or comments, please call us. Sincerely, ~ 12~ ~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MRElJB:mc Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, The BNSF Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Tim Lassen, TRC 'rIlC Customer'Focused Solutions " TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1 1I1I99( 54 6/16/99( 86 2I9/98( 46 2l2.8( 66 2I30/97( 43 6/24.!2.7(3) 85 2119/96(2) 63 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 211~5(2) 16/28~6(2) 60 84 9125,,!25(2 87 612 !,!25(2) 84 4125195(2 3/2 I 195( 67 2I30/94( 62 7128194( 92 PARAMETER LIMITATIONS EPA METHOD PARAMETERS 61 I I I 150°F N/A F) (0 Temperature Flashpoint (0 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >140 PMCC C) 32 13 2.0 9,0 27 30 9,0 87 90 8.7 28 4,7 3,2 1.3 0,5 90 405.1 Bio-oxygen Demand (mglL) 280 10 <4,0 67 12 <4,0 300 <4,0 210 <4,0 <4.0 <4,0 <4,0 2,200 40 300 160,2 Total Suspended Solids (mglL) 360 210 60 <10 260 50 130 340 220 280 90 250 80 300 400 3.500 60,4 Total Dissolved Solids (mgIL) pH (units) Benzene 8.5 <0.0003 <0,0003 <0.0005 <0.0005 8,8 7.1 6,9 6.4 6,6 7,1 7,2 6,3 5.9 6,4 6,2 6,8 6.4 6,2 12.0 6,0 50.1 <0.0015 <0,0015 <0,006 0,0019 0,0069 0,033 0,19 0,16 <0,0003 0,00 0.13 0,34 0,0006 0,002 0,24 0.50 602 (mgIL) (mgIL) <0,006 <0,0003 0,00096 0,0043 0,003 0,023 0,00 <0.0003 0,053 0,098 <0,0003 0.46 0,28 3.39 602 Toluene <0.0025 <0.0025 <0,010 0,0059 0,0055 0,089 0,27 0,027 <0,0005 <0,0005 0,0092 0,018 <0,0005 <0.0005 0,0096 7,92 602 Ethyl Benzene (mgIL) Total Xylenes (mgIL) Oil and Grease (mgIL) 0,025 0,023 0,014 0,170 0,21 0,250 0,024 II 0, II 0.3 0,31 0.0026 0.42 0,29 * 602 0.60 4.0 20 2,6 17 250 2,0 79 60 5,9 2 I 5,8 <2,0 1.8 .8 * 413,1 <0,05 92.247~ <0,05 <0,0 <0,010 <0,0005 <0, <0, 0,059 <0,01 <0,01 <0.01 <0.01 <0,01 Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only, Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW,4 and MW-7. Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-4 only (MW-7 not pumping), <0.01 <0,01 0,90 239,1 Lead (mgIL) (I (2 (3 TIIC stated, N/A = Not Analyzed. PMCC = Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. * = No limits. but monitoring required. < = Analytical results are less than detection limits ; . . ... ... ...... ...... --............. -- .............. ORANGE !,AST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (480) 736-0960 Fax (480) 736-0970 LABORATORY REPORT FORM Laboratory Name: ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL. INC. Address: 3002 Dow Suite 532 Tustin. CA 92780 Telephone: (714) 832-0064 Laboratory Certification (ELAP) No.: 1416 Expiration Date: 2001 Laboratory Director's Name (Print): Mark Noorani Client: TRC Project No.: 92-247 Project Name: BNSF-Navv Oil Laboratory Reference: TRC 11242 Analytical Method: 8260.8015/8020. 8015m. InorQanics. Lead Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Reported: 11/01/99 11/02/99 11/11/99 Sample Matrix: Water Chain of Custody Received: Yes Laboratory Direclo(s Signature: ~H ~ e e TRC ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92618 Client Project ID: BNSF Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sample Description: Water, Tank Effluent Laboratory Sample #: 99110010 Laboratory Reference #: TRC 11242 Sampled: 11/01/99 Received: 11/02/99 Reported: 11/11/99 ANAL YTE DATE TESTED EPA METHOD DETECTION LIMIT SAMPLE RESULTS Lead 11/03/99 6010 0.05 N.D. mg/I pH 11/02/99 150.1 8.5 Flashpoint 11/02/99 1010 26-60°C > 60°C Oil & Grease 11/04/99 413.1 0.5 0.60 mg/I Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. INT""·...· Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. TRC ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Analysis Method: Sample Description: e 5030/ 8020 Water Laboratory Reference #: TRC 11242 BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 602) e Client Project ID: BNSF Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 11/01/99 11/02199 11/05/99 11/11/99 Laboratory Sample Number Client Sample Number 99110010 Tank Effluent Benzene ug/I (ppb) N.D. Toluene ug/l (ppb) N.D. Ethyl Benzene ug/I (ppb) N.D. Total Xylenes ug/I (ppb) N.D. Surrogate Recovery TFT* (%) 87 Detection Limit: 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated detection limit. (NT ~.". * alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. e e TRC A TIN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92618 Client Project 10: BNSF Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sample Description: Water, Tank Composite Sampled: 11/01/99 Laboratory Sample #: 99110009 Received: 11/02/99 Laboratory Reference #: TRC 11242 Reported: 11/11/99 ANAL YTE DATE EPA DETECTION SAMPLE TESTED METHOD LIMIT RESULTS mg/I mg/I BOD 11/08/99 405.1 0.2 32 TSS 11/03/99 160.2 4.0 280 TDS 11/02/99 160.1 10 360 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. INT~· Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. e e QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 5030 18015m 18020 Date of Analysis: 11/05/99 Laboratory Sample No : 99100217 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 11242 Analyte R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % Benzene 0.0 5.0 4.7 4.6 94 92 2 Toluene 0.0 5.0 4.5 4.4 90 88 2 Ethylbenzene 0.0 5.0 4.6 4.5 92 90 2 Hydrocarbons 0.0 250 257 270 103 108 5 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) 1 SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) 1 SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 (NT 1\,\.",. Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. - e QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 8015m Date of Analysis: 11/05/99 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 11242 Analyte R1 (ppm) SP (ppm) MS (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % Hydrocarbons 0.0 5.0 6.1 5.2 122 104 16 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 INT~. Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. e e ~ QC DATA REPORT Laboratory Reference No : TRC 11242 Analyte Date QC R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD Tested Sample (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) % % % Lead 11/03/99 99100212 0.00 1.00 0.89 0.82 89 82 8 Oil & Grease 11/04/99 oca100 0.0 2.5 2.2 2.3 88 92 4 TDS 11/02/99 oca100 0 1000 1060 1080 106 108 2 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 INT~. Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ci. . E .g o .. U 0 Remarks ), " "~ --:::: o o I -' Page :2 of~ Project Name: BN SF - Alavy () ì Project No.: q '::l. - 'J....J..¡-=r Site Location:Rfj/¿ersf1( Id, elf. . Date: I I I 13..:L '~--" .-- ()r/lr1!1 e CtJû <,f AY1aP. SaM CJe' COY)-trQ I ~ nO;;t Dö vJ IUS1-l'I17 cA u Ship To: Attn: e 1qt7W ~. )( )( Date Time Sample Type \\L"'~ ' 5''1.0 I W;"I Solid I""", ili\ 155'0 )( /I - _ It II - ¡; 11 11 ª U II Depth Sample No. Jill1.K:~oS;1e 1ã rt k'. E I tAÆ.nt !l U II BoringlWel No. .. >, , TRC 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92618 , (949) 727-9336 ~_ TRC 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Walnut Creek. California 94598 (925) 935-3294 e Time ":f ---:z, ý 11.....\5 ~...... Date III"') ¡q9 \\ - è - í"'\ IE Company \QC nc~ Total Number of Samples Shipped: RelinQuished by: Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Special Instructions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements: Sev1d V€5uI+S C:¡++-v¡, Mo.+tEa+On Shipper's Signature: ~ Sigro"re .R /.....Jv.- ~ '-Ñ\ ~ .Cr., ~ I.... . _.~ A~orm(12I!I198Irmm) D The material(s) listed are received for analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the property of the client and not TRC. At the conclusion of the test work, all remaining material(s) will be returned to the client for eventual disposal at a licensed facility. ~. ~'~\ ....--,., , i, ." ./.~. AUG-17-1999 1S:31 P.B1Ã31 .ER BOARD FRESNO e ~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board \,;íj Central Valley Region StaVeD T. Buder, Chair WlDlt.ol1 B. Blckox S.c,.." /0" FftsDo Bnmc:b OfIIce !lIViP'OfI/Mflral Inœrnec Acldleal: http://www.llwrcb.c:a.ß'Dv/-rwqcb.~ p,."t«nørt 3614 Bqt Ashlin Avenue. Franc. California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116. PAX (S~) 445.5910 . Gny Da9iI GtlNPftD, TO: Brian Pitts FROM: Kern Co. Env. Health Services Dept. Bruce Myers Assoc. Eng. ~logist DATE: 18 August 1999 SIGNATIJlIE: þ- 'H/IA- SUBJECT: NAVY OIL SITE. 1433 UNION AVE., CLOSURE COMMENT Thanks for the additional information regarding historièal Pb and other analyses for the site. The Pb data was only from beneath the waste oil and diesel USTs and, therefore, doesn't answer my concern regarding leaded gasoline. rm not sure when the next groundwater sampling is scheduled so I'm relaying this infonnation by fax with the officialletrei to follow. I want to make sure the extra analyses I'd like to see to concur on closure are done during the next sampling round. The standard language that will be in the comment letter on the proposed closure will go something lib this: We approve your work plan provided that all groundwater samples include analysrs for 1,2- dichloroethane (l,2-DCA), ethylene dibromide (EDB), total lead, MTBE, tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), If it can be demonstrated that EDB or lead are not present at the site, testing for the applicable constituents can be j·topped. If it can be demonstrated that TAME, DIPE, ETBE. and TBA. are not present at the site, you may submit a proposal for reducing the frequency of analysis for these constituents. If MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ErBE, or TBA are detected and the analytical method used was . EPA Methods 8020 or 8021, their presence must be confirmed by GClMS (EPA Method 8260). Once the presence of MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE, or TBA are confirmed, EPA Methods 8020 or 8021 may be used again. As part of overall site characterkation, we require that you sample groundwater for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). It is not necessary to sample all monitoring wells for these constituents during these sampling event.s; a minimum of three wells should be sufficient, and must include the upgradient well. Please relay this information to the consultant working on the site. I'll send an officiallener, but it may rake a couple of weeks and ldidn'[ wane to miss a sampling opportunity if it came up. TOTFt... P,Bl e e BNSF .' , , .' . MICK E. HARDIN Burlington Northern Santa Fe Manager Environmental Remediation 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408-3571 Phone: (909) 386-4081 Fax: (909) 386-4087 July 27, 1999 01002724-61 Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed for your review is copy of S~mi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report for January through June, 1998, covering the fonner Navy Oil Company lease site near the comer of Union and Truxton A venues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers actions taken for operation and maintenance of the remaining portion of the remediation system along with groundwater monitoring. If questions arise during your review of the above infonnation, please contact me at the above telephone number. ~e~1\~ Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/o enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92718 n:lengrgftw,oprlen vironmentalladminlwordlsb\meh\072602,doc BNSF ..,~. . . .' . ' - Burlington NOrthern_ta Fe 740 East Carnegie Dtive San Bernardino, California 92408-3571 ......: (909) 386-4081 February 18, 1997 File: 01002724-61 Mr. Brian Pitts Kern County Environmental Health Services Department 2700 M Street, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed for your review is copy of semi-annual monitoring report for July through December, 1996, covering the former Navy Oil Company lease site near the comer of Union and Truxton Avenues, Bakersfield, California. This report covers monthly monitoring and maintenance of the vapor extraction system and groundwater recovery system and groundwater monitoring. Please note under item 2, section 4, "Site Closure Status" that if VOC content is low then the YES would be operated through June 1997 and a verifica~ion soil sampling program as described in chapter 8 of the Phase II Remediation Status and Phase III Remediation Workplan would be implemented. If questions arise during your review of this report, please contact Mick Hardin at the above telephone number. Sincerely, ~J'k~ Mick Hardin Manager Environmental Remediation Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services 1715 Chester Avenue, Third Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 (w/enclosure) Mr. Tim Lassen TRC Environmental Solutions 21 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92718 (w/o enclosure) 021402 '/I!¡ ~ ..~ ì e e 'TIIC RECE1fVED DEC 2 8 1998 BY' '= December 23, 1998 Project No. 92-247 Ms. April West Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 8101 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Semiannual Monitoring Report June through December 1998 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 The Burlington N0l1hern and Santa Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield, California Dear Ms. West: This letter summarizes the effluent monitoring results for June through December 1998 for the discharge located at The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD Permit, samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis and were collected on December 9, 1998. Additionally, headspace inside the temporary holding tank is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit (LEL). The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below: · The total volume of ground water discharged from June 12 through December 9, 1998 was 2,208 gallons. The total flow was reduced compared to previous quarters since the pump and air compressor operated intermittently during these months. · The average discharge per day was 10.1 gallons (0.000010 million gallons per day [mgd]), well below the pennitted flow of 0.001 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank was not detected each month. · As shown in Table 1, the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the next six months (January through June 1999), monthly monitoring of the headspace in the temporary holding tank will continue and the effluent will be sampled in June 1999. TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. 21 Technology Drive · Irvine, California 92618 Telephone.'727-9336 · FaxB-727-7399 949 949 Customer-Focused Solutions @ "' e e Ms. April West December 23, 1998 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." If you have any questions or comments, please call us. Sincerely, ~q¿~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MRE/JA:rm Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, BNSF Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Tim Lassen, TRC THC TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA , 2/9/98( 46 I 2~8( \) 66 I 61 ) 2130/97( 43 I 6/24/97(3 85 12/!,2¿?6(2) 63 6128/96(2 84 ANALYTICAL RESULTS - - 9/25/95(2) 14/95(2) - - 87 60 21 1 612 \ 195(2) 84 4125/95(2 ) I 3/21/95( 67 I) 12/30/94( 62 ) 7/28/94 ( 92 PARAMETER LIMIT A nONS EPA METHOD PARAMETERS 50° F I N/A F) (0 Temperature >60 2.0 >60 9.0 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >140 PMCC Flashpoint (0 C) 27 30 9.0 87 90 8.7 28 4,7 3.2 .3 I 0.5 90 405.1 Bio-oxygen Demand (mg/L) <4.0 67 2 I <4.0 300 <4.0 o I 2 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 2,200 40 300 60.2 I Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 60 I <10 260 ISO 30 I 340 220 280 90 I 250 80 I 300 400 3,500 60.4 I Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) I 7. 6,9 6.4 6.6 I 7, 7,2 6.3 5,9 6.4 6.2 <0.006 9 I 0.00 0,0069 0.033 9 I 0, 6 I O. <0.0003 I 0.00 3 I O. 0.34 <0.006 <0,0003 0.00096 0.0043 0.003 0,023 I 0.00 <0,0003 <0.0005 0.053 0.098 <0.010 0.0059 0.0055 0.089 0.27 0.027 <0.0005 0.0092 8 I 0.0 6.8 0.0006 <0.0003 <0.0005 0.0026 6.4 6.2 2.0 I 6,0 I 150. (units) pH 0.002 0.24 0.50 602 (mg/L) Benzene 0.46 0,28 3.39 602 Toluene (mg/L) <0.0005 0.0096 7.92 602 (mg/L) Xylenes (mg/L) Benzene Ethyl Total 0.025 0.023 0.014 70 I O. I 0.2 0.250 0.024 II 0, II 0.3 I 0.3 0.42 0.29 * 602 20 <0,0 !l2~NH/ey) 2.6 <0.010 7 I 250 2,0 79 60 5,9 2 I 5.8 <2,0 ,8 I .8 I * I 3. I 4 and Grease (mg/L) Oi l)l-l~ <0.0005 I <0. I <0. 0.059 I <0.0 <0,0 <0,0 <0,0 <0,0 Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7, Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-4 only (MW-7 not pumping). \ <0.0 <0.0 0.90 I 239 Lead (mg/L) (I) (2) (3) TIIC Not Analyzed. Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. No limits. but monitoring required. Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. N/A = PMCC = * = < = e LABORATORY DATA e TIIC I . 4& ... '\!æ..... -~..... ~- \iIW' _ ORANGltOAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 TRC ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sample Description: Water, Effluent Laboratory Sample #: 98120152 Laboratory Refernece #: TRC 10614 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 12/09/98 12/10/98 12/10-16/1998 12/17/98 Analyte EPA Detection Analysis Method Limit Results Oil & Grease 413.1 0.5 20 mg/I pH 150.1 7.1 Flashpoint 1010 26-60°C >60°C TSS 160.2 4.0 N.D. mg/I TDS 160.1 10 160 mg/l BOD 405.1 0.2 2.0 mg/l Lead 7421 0.01 N.D. mg/l .' "~' Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. Orange Coast Analytical '~H'~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director I . ß!t< .... ~..... ~- ~- 'Iii:iV_ ORANG~OAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 TRC A TTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Laboratory Reference #: TRC 10614 Sampled: Received: Analyzed: Reported: 12/09/98 12/10/98 12/15/98 12/17/98 Sample Description: Water, BTEX DISTINCTION (EPA 602) Laboratory Sample Number Client Sample Number Benzene µg/I Toluene µg/I Ethyl Benzene µg/I Total Xylenes µg/I Surrogate Recovery %* 98120153 Effluent N.D. N.D. N.D. 25 92 Detection Limit: 6.0 6.0 10 10 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detections. *alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene Orange Coast Analytical ~g~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director I . ... ... ~..... ~- ~- .....,,- ORANG!tOAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. -, 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 5030 / 8020 Date of Analysis: 12/14/98 Laboratory Sample No : 98120084 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 10614 Analyte R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % Benzene 0.0 5.0 4.4 4.6 88 92 4 Toluene 0.0 5.0 4.4 4.6 88 92 4 Ethylbenzene 0.0 5.0 4.6 4.7 92 94 2 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis sP , Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director I . .... ~ "iIIII!:I.~ ~ ~- -- ORANGttOAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: TDS (EPA 160.1) Date of Analysis: 12/11/98 Laboratory Sample No : 98120152 Laboratory Reference No: TRC 10614 Analyte R1 (ppm) SP (ppm) MS (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % TDS 160 1000 1140 1150 98 99 1 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~,~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director I . .m. ... ~..... ~ ~- --- ORANG~OAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: Lead (EPA 7421) Date of Analysis: 12/16/98 . Laboratory Sample No : 98120152 Laboratory Reference No : TRC 10614 Analyte R1 (ppb) SP (ppb) MS (ppb) MSD (ppb) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % Lead o 25 21 23 84 92 9 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL C;wæ,.þ ~ MARK NOORAN Laboratory Director I . ... .-. ~..... ~- u=_ ~- ORANG~OAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. e 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 QC DATA REPORT Analysis: Oil & Grease (EPA 413.1) Date of Analysis: 12/15/98 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No: TRC 10614 Analyte R1 (ppm) SP (ppm) MS (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % Hydrocarbons 0.0 2.5 2.9 2.7 116 108 7 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS+MSD)} x 100 x 2 ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~#~~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director , .~ ('''- -) (-) --' (~ '--- ., <, e e Ship To: 0 rr, NIl) <":",r" t 4..y I Page I of I CHAIN OF CUSTODY, RECORD .' " c .) Project Name: ~^ ,,,ç. ^)(Á",' n,/ / Analysis /. Attn: "")r; \.rv'\ ""' , 0 f' I'TV\ -+ r ~'\ \ '" .. --- I - - -..---. ~()() 7 f)", I ." ) Project No.: 1 7. - 7 L¡'7 ¡,"t,'. r/l Q .(11 f " .. Site Location: 1)1":, I<' r, ( I vi cI \. i " 1\1 I .. . c :--1 ~ Date: 1'( '-.5L..JS:f:- " " Ç:. v <z¡ " BoringlWell Sample Sample Type ~ ~ Sample Containers O~ ~ ,,~~""~ No. No. Depth Date Time Water Solid Other 8 (:) Vol. No. Tvoe Pres. $'",\<., f:Hlu(, IA+- (', 'J \1-1,,1(,,( I" '1.,() 't. I V Z. ~,LI X i... 'f.,.. '/.. I, v ¡:; N'\" . '/. > .,,-\- " )<; 4n y. \ Q \ ?nL, - X I , ~ 1\ I !-\1'j) l "- I l\~"r Ij I l ~()..,\ 7, \lIÌA \-! \ ~ 'ý.. \!.... \!... t. Z5t-J I Ifbt \.hlt!\ "- , Total Number of Samples Shipped: Shipper's Signature: Signature Company Date Time , Relinauished by: M~o ~ (\$ - ~ '''''~...., ,(è( 11..//0/1/ Received by: ~ - ,J rv-.. \ (' ,. ,,^ ..... 1\ <ìéA I z ~ 0 -q~ ~'t0 , ~ Relinquished by: Received by: Relinquished by: Received by: Special Instructions I Shipment I Handling! Storage Requirements: ,(Lv ~ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. D ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ~",l û.At f\.t.IV.-J.0 ~ ." 'I^r'lt~:tt ~~ 21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive Irvine. Calüomia 92718 Daytona Beach. Florida 32119 D ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. D ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. The materlal(s) listed are received ror analysis and/or treatability evaluation and remain the 1201 N. McDowell Boulevard 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 property or the client and not Environmental Solutions, loe. At the conclusion or the test work, Petaluma, Calüomia 94954 Walnut Creek, Calüomia 9459& all remaining materlal(s) will be returned to the client ror eventual disposal at a licensed raclllty. " ~J' - TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. e-' 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Telephone 714-727-9336 Fac5imile 714-727-7399 July 3, 1997 Project No. 92-247 Semiannual Monitoring Report January through June 1997 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California Ms. Lara Kimm Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 810 1 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Dear Ms. Kimm: This letter summarizes the effluent monitoring results for January through June 1997 for the discharge located at The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD Permit, headspace is monitored montWy for lower explosive limit (LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis and were collected on June 24, 1997. The montWy headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below: · The total volume of ground water discharged from January 1 to June 24, 1997 was 21,178 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 121 gallons (0.0001 million gallons per day [mgd]), well below the permitted flow of 0.003 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank ranged from <0.01 percent to 0.03 percent. · As shown in Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the next six months (July through December 1997), monthly monitoring of the headspace in the temporary holding tank will continue and the effluent will be sampled in December 1997. -"1í. ~' " @ <¡' e e 'J"RC Environmental Solutions Inc. Ms. Lara Kimm July 3, 1997 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information subnùtted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is; to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for subnùtting false information, including the possibility of fme and imprisonment for knowing violations." If you have any questions or comments, please call us. Sincerely, ~rfZ ~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MRFlJA:ks Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Tim C. Lassen,.TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. .~ /- @ -) TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION A VENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA e e EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETERS METHOD LIMITATIONS 7/28/94(1) 12130/94(1) 3/21195(1) 4/25/95(2) 6/21195(2) 9/2S/95(2) 12/14/9S(2) 6/28/96(2) 12119/96(2) 6/24/97(3) Temperature (0 F) N/A IS0° F 92 62 67 , - 84 87 60 84 63 8S Flashpoint (0 C) PMCC >140 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60' >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Bio-oxygen Demand 40S.1 * O.S 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 87 9.0 30 (mgIL) Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2,200 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 210 <4.0 300 <4.0 (mgIL) Total Dissolved Solids 160.4 3,500 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 340 130 150 (mgIL) pH (units) IS0.1 6.0 - 12.0 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 7.2 7.1 6.6 Benzene (mgIL) 602 0.50 0.24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.001 <0.0003 0.16 0.19 0.033 Toluene (mgIL) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0.053 <0.0003 0.001 0.023 0.003 0.0043 Ethyl Benzene (mgIL) 602 7.92 0.0096 <O.OOOS <O.OOOS 0.018 0.0092 <O.OOOS <0.0005 0.027 0.27 0.089 Total Xylenes (mgIL) 602 * 0,29 0.42 0,0026 0,31 0.311 0.11 0.024 0.2S0 0.21 0.170 Oil and Grease 413.1 * 1.8 1.8 <2.0 5.8 12 S.9 60 79 2.0 2S0 Lead 239.1 0.90 ' <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.OS9 <0.1 <0.1 (7I3/97/js) 92-247 THC Environmental SolufÎonslnc. (1) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. (2) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW -4 and MW -7. (3) Sample contain~ liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW -4 only (MW -7 not pumping). N/A = Not Analyzed. PMCC = Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. * = No limits, but monitoring required. < = Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. \ ~ · . ... a- ....... ....... .... -- -- e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil Client Project #: 94-247 Analysis Method: EPA 5030 / 8020 Sample Description: Water Sampled : 06-18-97 Received: 06-19-97 Analyzed: 06-26-97 Reported: 06-27-97 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226 BTEX (EPA 8020) Laboratory Client Ethyl Total Surrogate Sample Sample Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery Number Number ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l TFT* (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) 70605230 Tank Grab 33 4.3 89 170 103 Detection Limit: 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. * alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorotoluene -~ ,r ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~#~; Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ~, ' . . .. ... ...... -- -- -- e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy all Client project #: 94-247 Sample Description: Water, Tank Composite Sampled : 06-18-97 Received: 06-19-97 Analyzed: 06-25-97 Reported: 06-27-97 Laboratory Sample #: 97060522 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226 Analyte EPA Method Detection Analysis Limit Result mg/l mg/l 0.1 N.D. 0.2 30 10 150 4.0 N.D. Lead 6010 BOD 405.1 TDS 160.2 TSS 160.1 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. -~ /' ~ ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~u~~ Mark Noorani Laboratory Director · . ... ... ..... ... -- -- -- e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy 011 Client project #: 94-247 Sample Description: Water, Tank Grab sampled : 06-18-97 Received: 06-19-97 Analyzed: 06-19/20-97 Reported: 06-27-97 Laboratory Sample #: 97060523 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 9226 Analyte EPA Method Detection Limit Analysis Result Oil & Grease 413.2 0.5 250 mg/l pH 150.1 6.6 Flashpoint 1010 26°-60°C >600C Analytes reported as N. D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. .~ ,,¡- ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~an~ Laboratory Director · . ... .. ~..... -- -- -- e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 '< QC DATA REPORT Analysis: Oil & Grease ( EPA 413.2 ) Date of Analysis: 06/25/97 Laboratory Sample No : OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226 Analyte R1 ·(ppm) SP (ppm) MS , (ppm) MSD (ppm) PR1 % PR2 % RPD % Hydrocarbons 0.0 2.5 2.3 2.4 92 96 4 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) I SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSDJ) x 100 x 2 .~ ,F ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~ M RK NOORANI Laboratory Director . . ... ... ..... ..... ...... ...... -- -- e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 927ào (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 ~ QC DATA REPORT Analysis: EPA 5030 / 8015m / 8020 Date of Analysis: 06/23/97 Laboratory Sample No: 97060504 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226 Hydrocarbons R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD . (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) % % % 0.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 108 108 0 0.0 5.0 5.1 5.0 102 100 2 0.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 108 108 0 0.0 250 240 220 96 88 9 Analyte Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) / SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) I (MS + MSDJ) x 100 x 2 -1- /' ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL 0øtØJ~ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director - I . ... ... ....... ....~ -- ..... .....,. e e ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 r QC DATA REPORT Analysis: Inorganics Date of Analysis: 06/20-25/97 Laboratory Sample No: 97060709 OCA 100 Laboratory Reference No : ESI 9226 Analyte R1 SP MS MSD PR1 PR2 RPD (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) % % % Lead 0.00 1.00 1.02 0.95 102 95 7 TDS 1700 .1000 2600 2700 90 100 4 Definition of Terms: R1 Results Of First Analysis SP Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results PR1 Percent Recovery Of MS: {(MS-R1) / SP} x100 PR2 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD-R1) I SP} x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS-MSD) / (MS + MSD)} x 100 x 2 ."'" /' ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL ~~/ MARK NOORANI Laboratory Director CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ~ ,¡" , \ , \ '~ } :'. ;" .. < ' ,,;t. -, , .J,.~if". " . Page I of. l Pn>jeCtName: &J"F, ^)fWyO/', PrÒject Nò.: C¡Z· 2. 47 ',' , Site Location: & Irr 15- .p ~ I d (¡.q Date: G:. j--'....E...:j..2l..- . Ore, nyo C.DC! <, t AJ1< 1)1 t.1(1:, ~CjW\pJ (',..lY\r.rol 30:)7 Ú{)¡A I ' ¡; ,... f :.,., {' tJ Ship To: Altn: , -' e ,} --, , I ;,..' Remarks '. , , i x.1 ~ , .' Sample Type Time Water! Solid Iother --' II,;,C;Ò, 'I.. Depth ~L~e ~ Sample No. :. ~ Boring/Wel No. . mw-5 mLù- 7_ mlAJ- c., f'qlll-A. mil - (.1 (VIllJ-1 7fU\~ ' C... Ta r'\ ( ('....rr.lh \ ... ,- ð i e ~ L \ Time ":9:2.ð Date c.hsA7 U;/~'-~ì '- " ct m. (\.. ), ~ 1 æ-~'" - - T Company - - - (') c...A ~~ .., LJ J,-h' Shipper's Signature: Signature RelinQllÎshed by: )::lQ" ^^........ (~--l.ðo Q., ,Ir' Received by: 'r'<""'\"\ V A-.......\C' ^ - ,"-A À-- Relinquished by;. ,Received by: Relinquished by: ~ Total Number of Samples Shipped: S ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 21 Technology Drive 1172 Pelican Bay Drive Irvine, California 92718 Daytona Beach, Florida 32119 , Handling/Storage Requirements: ¡ , ~~,.~~ \, Received by: Special Instruétions I Shipment' [J ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 2815 Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 Walnut Creek, California 94598 f [J ENVIRONMENTAtSOLUTIONS, INC. 1201 N. McDowell Øoúlevard Petaluma, éalifornia94954 , , ~ , Tttè materlal(s) listed are rèœlved for IÛfilysls and/or treatablllty;evaluatlon and remain the property of the client and not Envltoßlnental Solutions, Inc. At the conClusion or the test work, all remaining materlal(s) will be returned tò the client for eventual disPosal at a lIœnsed fadllty. ~ '. - - ~ r- July 12, 1996 - TIIC Environmental Solutions/ne. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Telephone 714-727-9336 Facsimile 714-727-7399 Project No. 92-247 Ms. Lara Kimm Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 810 1 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Dear Ms. Kimm: This letter summarizes the first half of 1996 effluent monitoring results for the discharge located at the Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD permit, headspace is monitored montWy for lower explosive limit (LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis. The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below. · The total volume of ground water discharged from January 1 to June 28, 1996 was 64,110 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 356 gallons (0,0004 mgd), well below the permitted flow of 0.003 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank ranged from <0.01 percent to 0.03 percent. · As shown ~J;1 Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the last week of December 1995, the weekly batch discharge was modified to a continuous discharge. This work was completed as described in the Petition to Change Effluent Limitation letter dated December 8, 1995, and approved pursuant to your letter dated December 18, 1995. The revised IWD permit was issued February 2, 1996 and the sampling frequency of the discharge was reduced to semiannual sampling. <Ð l' ~ - e Tile Environmental Solutions/ne. Ms. Lara Kimm July 12, 1996 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: . "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the infonnation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the sy.s_tem, Qr)þose persons direC?t1y !esponsible for gat~ering the __ infonnation, the infonnation submittèd is, tõ the bëst of rñý_· ,.-' knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false infonnation, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. " If you have any questions or comments, please contact Matt Eaton at (714) 727-9336. Sincerely, ~~ Tim C. Lassen, P. E. Project Director TCUJA:as Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Matt Eaton, TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. @ :5"" ? ,- e e TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION A VENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETERS METHOD LIMITATIONS 7/28/94(1) 12130194(1) 3/21195(1) 4/25/95(2) 6/21/95(2) 9/25/95(2) 12/14/95(2) 6/28/96(2) Temperature (0 F) N/A 1500 F - - - - - - - 84 Flashpoint (0 C) PMCC >140 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Bio::oxygen ~~and _ 405,1 * 0.5 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 87 (mg/L) , -- -~---- - - -' --- ---- '- -- - --- "-- --- ,- -, ------ -- -- ---- - Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2.200 <4.0 <4,0 <4,0 <4,0 210 <4.0 (mg/L) Total Dissolved Solids 160.4 3,500 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 340 (mg/L) pH (units) 150.1 6.0 - 12,0 6,2 6.4 6.8 6,2 6.4 5.9 6.3 7.2 Benzene (mg/L) 602 0.50 0,24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.001 <0.0003 0.16 Toluene (mg/L) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0.053 <0.0003 0.001 0.023 Ethyl Benzene (mg/L) 602 7.92 0.0096 <0.0005 <0,0005 0,018 0,0092 <0.0005 <0.0005 0,027 Total Xyl~nes (mg/L) 602 * 0.29 ' 0.42 0,0026 0.31 0.311 0.11 0.024 0.250 Oil and Grease 413.1 * 1.8 1.8 <2,0 5,8 12 5.9 60 79 Lead 239.1 0.90 <0,01 <0,01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.059 ~____ _ 0--__ 92-247 (7/12/96fbg) (I) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. (2) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7. N/A PMCC * Not Analyzed. Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. No limits. but monitoring required, Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. < TDC frwironrmmtal SoIutioM Inc. .................-..--.. ! ~Di ~ (ê"§Îr7;,~77~ ~I /Ui,_:=J ,_:,¿ l_,:J IY L'= ¡ ~l JAN £) 1997 ¡ tsy Project No. 92-247 .,;;, ~ e TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. e 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92718 Telephone 714-727,9336 Facsimile 714-727-7399 January 2, 1997 Ms. Lara Kimm Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 8101 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Semiannual Monitoring Report July through December 1996 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-BK-0020 Santa Fe Railway Company 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California Dear Ms. Kimm: This letter summarizes the 1996 effluent monitoring results for July through December 1996 for the discharge located at the Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Permit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD permit, headspace is monitored monthly for lower explosive limit (LEL). Samples of the discharged water are collected for laboratory analyses on a semiannual basis and were collected on December 19, 1996. The monthly headspace monitoring results are summarized below and the semiannual analytical results are summarized in Table 1 (attached). The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below. · The total volume of ground water discharged from July 1 to December 19, 1996 was 90,350 gallons. · The average discharge per day was 525 gallons (0.0005 mgd), well below the permitted flow of 0.003 mgd. · The LEL in the headspace of the temporary holding tank ranged from <0.01 percent to 0.03 percent. · As shown in Table 1 (attached), the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. Pursuant to the IWD Permit, the annual inspection was conducted on November 26, 1996 by representatives of the City of Bakersfield Public Works Department and TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. Additionally, a representative of the City of Bakersfield Public Works Division witnessed discharge sampling on December 19, 1996. @ 7 e TIIC Environmental Solutions Inc. e "r,.' Ms. Lara Kimm January 2, 1997 Page 2 Pursuant to your letter dated July 5, 1996, the following certification statement has been added: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." If you have any questions or comments, please call us. Sincerely, ~1Z.~ Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. Project Manager MRE/JA:dr Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Tim C. Lassen, TRC Environmental Solutions, Inc. " @ TABLE 1 ANALYSIS RESULTS IWD PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION A VENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA e ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETER LIMITATIONS EPA METHOD PARAMETERS 12/19/96(2) 6/28/96(2) 12/14/95(2) 9/25/95(2) 6/21195(2) 4/25/95(2) 3/21195(1 ) 12/30/94( 1) 7/28/94(1 ) 63 84 60 87 84 67 62 92 150° F N/A F) (0 Temperature >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >140 PMCC Flashpoint (0 C) 9.0 87 300 <4.0 90 210 8.7 28 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.5 * 405.1 Bio-oxygen Demand (mgIL) <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 2,200 40 * 160.2 Total Suspended Solids (mgIL) 130 340 220 280 190 250 180 300 400 3,500 60.4 I 1 Total Dissolved Solids (mgIL) pH (units) Benzene 7.1 7.2 6.3 5.9 6.4 6.2 6.8 6.4 6.2 2.0 I 6.0 50.1 0.19 0.16 <0.0003 0.001 0.13 0.34 0.0006 0.002 0.24 0.50 602 (mgIL) (mgIL) 0.003 0.023 0.001 <0.0003 0.053 0.098 <0.0003 0.46 0.28 3.39 602 e 0.27 0.027 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.0092 0.018 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.0096 7.92 602 602 0.21 0.250 0.024 0.11 0.311 0.31 0.0026 0.42 0.29 * 2.0 79 60 5.9 12 5.8 <2.0 1.8 1.8 * 1 1 413 Ethyl (mglL) - - Total Xylenes (mgIL) Oil and Grease Lead Toluene Benzene <0.1 - (l2l31196/dr) 0.059 - 92-247 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7. <0.01 0.90 239. (I (2) mc Environmental Solutions Inc, -~--~---_. Not Analyzed. Pensky-Martins Closed Cup. No limits, but monitoring required. Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. - N/A PMCC * < 12/31/1996 13:55 71483167 ORANGE COAST4IÞALVTI PAGE 132 ? . .: && -- ";. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736.0970 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr.¡ Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Sample vescrip~ion: Water, Tank Composite Client Project ID: BNSF-Navy 011 Client Project #: 94-247 Laboratory Sample #: 96120239 Sampled : 12-19-96 Received: 12-19-96 Analyzed: 12-23/27-96 Reported: 12-30-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 8433 Ana1;yte EPA Detection Analysis Metbod Limi t: Result mg/l mg /1 Lead 6010 0.1 N.D. BOD 405.1 0.2 9.0 TDS 160.2 10 130 TSS 160.1 4.0 300 Analytes 'reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. ORANGE COAsT ANALYTICAL Hark Noorani Laboratory Director 12/31/1995 08:48 71481°57 ORANGE COAS~ALVTI PAGE 02 ... ! J.: ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL~ INC. T' 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832-0064 Fax (714) 832.0067 ~ 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736·0960 Fax (602) 736.0970 Environmeptal Solutions, ATTN: Mr., Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, c~ 92718 Sample De~cription: Water, Tank Grab Laboratory sample #: 96120240 Inc. Client; Project; ID: BNSF-Navy OIl Çlíent Project #: 94-247 SiUD.pled : Received: Analyzed: Report;ed: 12-19-96 12-19-96 12-20/23-96 12-30-96 Laboratory Reference #: ESI 8433 Analyte EPA Method Det=ection Limit Analysis Result oil & Grease 413.2 pH 150.1 .! Flashpoin~ 1010 0.5 2.0 mg/l 7.1 26°-60oe >60oe Analytes ~eported as N. D. were not present above the stated limit of detection; ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL Hark NoorEini Laboratory Director 12/31/1996 ~8:48 714832~~67 e ORANGE COAST ANALYTI e PAGE 134 l' . I:: Q." - ~.. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 83~-0064 Fax (714) 832-0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4. Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 736-0960 Fax (602) 736-0970 Envíroll1D.ent;;al ~olu1;ions, Inc_ ATTN: Mr. Matti Eaton 21 Technology:Pr. Irvine, CA 92718 Analysis MethoØ: EPA 5030 I 8020 Sample Descríp~ion: Water Laboratory, Re.rerence #: ESI8433 Client;; Project ID: BNSF-Navy Oil c11enr Project #: 94-247 Sampled : 12-19-96 Received: 12-19-96 Analyzed: 12-24-96 Reported: 12-30-96 BTEX lEPA 8020) Labora1;ory C1Jen:t, Ethyl To-tal Sttt'rogate Sample Saipple Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Recovery Number Nwpber ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l 'l'F'l'* (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (%) 96120240 Tank Grap 190 3.8 270 210 110 Detection Limit: 0,3 0.3 0.5 0.5 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. * alpha, alpha, alpha-trífluorotoluene ., ,)RANGE COAST ANALYTICAL fark Noorani ~oratory Director ~ " e _ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. December 22, 1995 Ms. Wen-Shi Cheung Wastewater Division Public Works Department City of Bakersfield 8101 Ashe Road Bakersfield, California 93313 Project No. 92-247 Fourth Ouarter Monitoring Report October through December 1995 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Pennit No. 2-BK-0020 Santa Fe Railway Company Property 1433 Union Avenue Bakersfield. California 1!õJ ~ (Ç; ~ n W' ~ ~ ~(JAW 3 1996 n By ~ ---.,...-",.-",~ Dear Ms. Cheung: This letter summarizes the Fourth Quarter 1995 effluent monitoring results for the weekly batch discharge of ground water from the onsite holding tank located at the Santa Fe Railway Company site at 1433 Union Avenue, Bakersfield, California. The weekly batch discharge is regulated by Industrial Wastewater Discharge (IWD) Pennit No. 2-BK-0020. Pursuant to the IWD pennit, each batch is monitored weekly for lower explosive limit (LEL) and temperature prior to discharge, and samples are collected for laboratory analyses quarterly. The weekly monitoring results are summarized in Table 1 and the quarterly analytical results are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory analysis report is attached and key points are summarized below. · The total volume of ground water discharged from October 1 to December 21,1995 was 14,200 gallons. · The average discharge per week was 1,183 gallons (0.0018 MG/week), well below the pennitted flow of 0.0021 MG/week. · As shown in Table 2, the monitoring parameters did not exceed the effluent limitations. During the last week of December 1995, the weekly batch discharge will be modified to a continuous discharge. This work will be completed as described in the Petition to Change Effluent Limitation letter dated December 8, 1995, and was approved per your letter dated December 18, 1995. It is our understanding the revised IWD pennit will be reissued in January 1996. If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at the number listed below. Sinèerely, ~ t¿ &P-- Matthew R. Eaton, R.G. . Project Manager MREIIH:pm Attachments cc: Mick Hardin, Santa Fe Railway Company Brian Pitts, Kern County Environmental Health Services Department Howard Wines, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Office of Environmental Services Miro Knezevic, Environmental Solutions, Inc. Tim Lassen, Environmental Solutions, Inc. 21 Technology Drive -Irvine, California 92718 - (714) 727-9336 - Fax (714) 727-7399 A TRC Company " " e e TABLE 1 BATCH DISCHARGE LOG FROM ONSITE HOLDING TANK PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA TEMPERATURE GAlLONS LEL OF GROUND DATE DISCHARGED READINGS WATER IN ANALYSES COMMENTS (%) STORAGE TANK COP) 10/13/95 2,000 0 80 NA None 10/27/95 2,000 0 70 NA None 11/2/95 ' 2,000 0 61 NA None 1117/95 2,000 0 61 NA None 11/29/95 2,000 0 62 NA None 11/30/95 200 0 60 NA None 12/14/95 2,000 0 6Ö Full Set 4th quarter sample for IWD compliance 12/21/95 2,000 0 60 NA Convert to continuous discharge , 92-247 (12122195/dk) FOURTH 14,200 QUARTER TOTAL CUMULA TIVE 67,800 TOTAL NA = Not Analyzed LEL = Lower explosive limit measured in headspace of tank using LEI.. meter. ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 'C e e TABLE 2 QUARTERLY ANALYTICAL GROUND WATER DATA FROM ONSITE HOLDING TANK PERMIT 2-BK-0020 1433 UNION A VENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA , EPA PARAMETER ANALYTICAL RESULTS PARAMETERS MEfHOD LIMITATIONS 7/28194(1) 12130/94(1 3121195(1) 4/25/95(2) 6/21/95(2) 9Í25195(2) 12114195(2 Flashpoint eC) PMCC >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 Bio-oxygen Demand 405.1 * 0.5 1.3 3.2 4.7 28 8.7 90 (mgIL) Total Suspended Solids 160.2 * 40 2,200 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 210 (mgIL) Total Dissolved Solids 160.4 2,700 400 300 180 250 190 280 220 (mgIL) pH (units) 150.1 6.0 - 12.0 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 Benzene (mgIL) 602 0.71 0.24 0.002 0.0006 0.34 0.13 0.00 1 <0.0003 Toluene (mgIL) 602 3.39 0.28 0.46 <0.0003 0.098 0.053 <0.0003 0.00 1 Ethyl Benzene (mgIL) . 602 7.92 0.0096 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.018 0.0092 <0.0005 <0.0005 Total Xylenes (mgIL) 602 * 0.29 0.42 0.0026 0.31 0.311 . 0.11 . 0.024 Oil and Grease 413.1 * 1.8 1.8 ,<2.0 5.8 12 5.9 60 Leæ 239.1 0.90 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 92-247 (12122195/cm) (1) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Well MW-7 only. (2) Sample contained liquid recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4 and MW-7. PMCC = Pensky-Martins Closed Cup * = No limits, but monitoring required. < = Analytical results are less than detection limits stated. . . ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS '" tlec.21 '95 13:07 \.\ ~ O~GE COAST ANALYTICAL FAX 71483.67 P. 2 ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin. CA 92680 (714) 832~0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 Bnvironmen~al Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Analysis Me'thod: 413.2 Sample Description: 'Water Laboratory Re:ference #: ESI 6819 Lélboratory sample Number 95120382 Detection Limit: Client Project; ID: Navy oil Client Project; #: 92-247 sampled : 12-14-95 Received: 12-15-95 Analyzed: 12-'18-95 Reported: 12-21-95 OIL & GREASE Cl.ient S81Ilple Number T-l EJctxactable Hydrocarbons mg/l (pþ1IJ) 60 0.5 Analytes reported as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ~ ".. Dec.21 '95 13:08 ~GE COAST ANALYTICAL FAX 71'67 Ii . :..& .. ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832·0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 Client Project ID: Navy oi 1 Client projecr #: 92-247 Arzalysis Het:hod: EPA 5030 I 8020 SaJ1J.p~e Descriprion: Water Laboratory Re£erence #: ESI 6819 Samp~ed : 12-14-95 Received: 12-15-95 Analyzed: 12-19-95 Reported: 12-21-95 AROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANICS CEPA 8020) ,Laboratory Sample Number client SaIlJp~e Number Benzene ugll (ppb ) 95120382 T-l N.D. To~uene ugll (ppb) Bthy ~ Benzene ug/~ (ppb ) Tota~ Xy~enes ug/~ (ppb) P. 3 SUrrogate Recovery TF'l''* t%J 108 Detection Limit: 0.3 1.0 N.D. 24 0.3 0.5 0.5 Analytes reported ,as N.D. were not present above the stated limit of detection. '* alpha, al.pha, a~pha-trífluorotoluene ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL Mark Noorani' Laboratory Director .. '" Dec.22 '95 11:31 ~NGE CORST ANRLYTICRL FRX 714~067 P. 2 \\ ORANGE COAST ANAL YT/CAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin. CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 Environmen~al Solu~ions, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 SlUlJple Description: water, T-l Client Project ID: Navy oil Client Project #: 92-247 Laborat:ory SB.JlJple #: 95120382 Sampled : 12-14-95 Received: 12-15-95 Analyzed: 12-18-95 Reported: 12-21-95 - Laboratory Reference #: ESI 6819 Analyte BPA Detection Sample Method Lim1 t Result Flashpoint (1010) 26-60° C >600 C BOD (405.1) 0.2 90 mg/l Total Suspended Solids (160.2) 4.0 210 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids (160.1) 10 220 mq/l pH (150.1) 6.3 Analytes reported as N.D. were ,not present above the 'stated limit of detection. . 6 ORANGB COAS'J! ANALYTICAL Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ·Dec.21 '95 13:09 . .NGE COAST ANAL YT I CAL ". ~ . ..,.... FAX 7148_67 P. 5 ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL, INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 832-0064, Fax (714) 832-0067 Environmental Solutions, Inc. ATTN: Mr_ Matt Eaton 21 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92718 sample Description: Water Labora1;oryRe~erence #: ESI 6819 Laboratory Sample Number 95120382 Detection Limit: Client Project ID: Navy Oil Client Project #: 92-247 Sampled : 12-14-95 Received: 12-15~95 Analyzed: 12-19-95 Reported: 12-21-95 TOTAL LEAD tEPA 74211 Client Sample Nu11Jber T-1 Sample Result (mg/1) N.D. 0.01 Analytereported as N.D.' was not present above the stated limit of detection. ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL Mark Noorani Laboratory Director ~ ~ ~, :î!~~~:,~i :.: " .:1.;<o:~,,: " " ,: , " " .....¡. , " , " ; " " . :~,,,,1 )tJ e e TIme ..u , i.s. t.·.. .; _'~AL SOLUTIONS, INC. ,§~h72PcIiCan Bay Drive ~oná'Beach, Florida 32119 ~~\~r k '/. . " ~ÖNMENT AL SOLUTIONS, INC. ~f!í~'::~.15:Mitchell Drive, Suite 103 :¡<~i'Y.~ut Creek, California 94598 '~\:s}Jç··:t::\':; - :%~~~'~.~ " Remarks IV f I ~, ''":;, .~;rêîÎÄîiib~ÔDY;ÎŒCORD ;¡ s,,,.~;e¡,,.,. h""~~~~J., ~ . '.. ...' ~' ~ ,y;,t:4;:~bilýß1ï~;' ~ ,," -l1/i1ffliflJi/:ê ~ ~i~CI: ""~~I,}:F "·,,..,'~ti,'..'."·~, '''',l,~,''''''',',lf','i','',''',''',',~~ """ì ,;':¡~'" :',> ''"I'': "., ' , ::_.,...~ ,\,...-';;f."V..l/.'J!oI~ ',- ~,t~~~"¡.. !".... ~ \ .~. ',:'to,!' ..~-, ~" .~ . \ ' ..'f ""¡(..\"''. .~1rt' ~t.".. ....... M..1...,,·· ,., ...,..;;~ '*'... '," gm, "'I, ·~:;;i~::'~A::,~~;,-~;:;~,";~:;-,;'C'ô_,~ 11 ~ .:jl"~ n; , ; , '3:__' ,~.e.:,:~ ': ! ;'8: \1">8D1p;:', '~'".ctI~".~ ;,: ·~~is~hl...$K.fJ9.'tf~'fi;~ ' ,'.' Wlf'eHSOltd >i eriJ ' : 0 ~Yòìno;' ~1fim~ ;y", ,"'t, ;C? :- S ,'~ r = . ' " iij ~,":';'i;ý,'~'·'~.Þ-Bl"", ", ','~,;;',",~'" :':';"'.::.I'il"·,ii"',, ;"",\I?j¡t~i:,!:'''''~, "'lii'.i<-~j,',"'~,.~,',",':J> ~1_1~;''t.'~.ìi',' !,>:~,,: ',";;- ' ~ I' . :" . 'J¡ , ,~:<:. t~:: r~~r~~~ :~~~ I~~ftt: ·~f'J!f ~~~ ~ ~ \f~>f: ~ ~p tt~: ',', .'";;;.' ~ ~~~~:mf'~_<ir' :"¡':'~;~a':.·"'"' '~~~r~"'~\:¡¡fN:';'X {f><~¡"n':""< ,..,' , þ .'T~.';:::y;1 ,,"\~"_~ :~~~~,' :~~ ,;; ~p:, ": ,-;~,~.!,' "; ~..,.;' ,': ~ ~~:'~~¡;:~; ;~~;;: ~: ' . ;:> :~~,,' ;:',';::~":;':.'. <;,.(::i:'2;".;¡-~\. ~ ~I:¡t"",,,¡~n;;:;~ .~ ,~! }¥' ~ l~>Þ ',' _.~;;;~,~j¡,,~~. !;$J;,;;. I~ !\_<., ,\ ?; T..·· ... ~~...i'~ ~~~~i~.j¡¡i! ¡~$~.,j¡~ ;,;",.... ..~~~~~ 1:"i~I~'~i¡'.'¡ ':: c'<:>,:,""\·~:"~. _ R(~~;;:.~~1~'~':1i .. ~¡r', 'U, ,,~~£~!\~,r.:;t~{;tl~!~ _ ¡i.'t.{' ~~~; ~11t I~v"'" l:t0.,;·~_J;!··· <,. .;:;~;.'" ,.:' :- :''''~ë'",~)t':;. ' . .~~ '- :. - .~.·...1!2'".~~·: ~;:~;t..>...~,:,.·I..~~:, ': ,: . .. ;.'~ .~;: I;;", ., .~.~".~, .~~.. :~.'.:~.,,~~":. '. _~.~~:~.._ . :.... - > '::~~'" :_~,:. .'~~.' ~.".~:':::- "~~::,. . 'f')! '.~:- '. ~:.-:. ..'.... .. .. '. 1·;<;: ~ .~~;* "'~1r~'·i;· ø; W~,;';:·t~,.." ~\J;: !ij¡j¡Wla i1..~~ ~ ~.,'~ ~ 1#'" "'" ";·~:'l~~'···'·'··"1 Ii;; .... '·~ir:~ . j':J~~~~~~ ÌÎ ~,. ·~~~r!Ia.¡i~~' "..,,<\j " ~" . ~..,;,~,.~ .~i;~ :ø,.. ','~' ,~~"m., )~ .,"~ ;";. . ·¡t:: ',' ..¿ .' .'{!!:: l~;~l'~ k-Wi ~; _ ;- '> . 'iii' --"1 ' , ~¡{;;~ f~ I~", " "- ~,.' .:"Î m", ~:;:' . ,"'" IE .' .~:~' 'Ii~¡ "':~ ,c,,'" ' ~ ' B·"':tS{'-.·,~ ')¡t '," .~.,... ,""", '''i< ;'¡ ;'f<., " ; , m~íiip5. ~(M~$' }~ ~ ' ' . " ~~: ~-,'i. . ~~¥i ;Ð';:,.~ . ~'<S~1l.1~· ' il~: . .~~~ ,," '-. "1 '. ~ . ,,~ '~,- :.~, ~~~~~~" ';~Bj?'~ Iii . ,~, -- "-"" i?!'Aìl!R~~!i;;,;1J¥' ,~., ~, .' J~ ~'iìf:~ , ." ,}j¡' , ~ ,.,.-;.... "'"J"~ ,..1 .>~ ~..,:,.1!:;-' ' , «-!' ~/~~!i£; ! ~.. ' 3'11: ~~\,?f¿kf .;í~'!.~ " "', , ~t~¡, ,,:!¡ ¡J,;~1t;: :r;;¡\':;''''.c;·/Ff$: 1-;.'; «:;:~-,::':\, ;~ "\""~ '~:r::~{~, _ ~""',. -TW... ~ ..iW:;-:t!- 52 ." :') , ,_~ ~,..- ~.';'<~~~.. ~~:!~~' :~~~~::.:- ':~'~4m I·;{"i:~ . II . "BE' ': ii·~.i~."'":, ,R ,~," }~r$~~tÆiHM '~ ~ . "~/.r~;'~~ ~~ -~.;; .~ '~,;~'-'" .. ,. . "._ :"':~..' ,.¡. - "if .~J:/r~. ~~g~~,~,: ¡:~;~-, ~~ , ,~.~$j '.' ~..,"'~" ~ "i<>;~._. ~l"~'~i'''';J1:~~''.'b",<".;Æ,). ··'r., Totà1 NUÌÌ1bêtorsâifip_š~~'1J~tSb1~I:S~:-"-;." :: '~:i1 ~~~ð2:~~ ~_!:!J~~\;t~S:;:'f;~~t'~"c.¡;;;t/#t:i j~;;'~i-' -" ~fr§Pi I Tii¡ ~,",",;~,",i"'¡,~i;',.:;/!;',"'~,"i'iI.'~:Ii :41 ti,>', i''''''''.' . ~~;~~,'," ií:-~ ~~"t';¡, ,,¡.Ii .,.,." ',",',';,.," , ,''',',' ~ebnquiSl!~p"~(f~ ~ ~~~\;~~~¿~ ¡Ji ~!Æ)'jj1'... }~ ~$~:;k" . ?~1 f:-;" lIt,ff,,' JI 'L~;'¡:4,jj ~ 'H,'tæ I. p'~p. á!tr,¢n ',';.',,!,\"" ..,.. "',';'" ~~~~:t~>;{ ..~..~., ~~~~~~~t~~ ':~':: ~~~~r~~:::i?: '. nI~.).:·· '. . , '.' ; ·:t~? ?;:;~d:~·, - Dâtê 1:!;L;:' ..;:~~'.' : .'11:;::':..--:, ~~~~~~: !ijf~jf,\:d~!~'''; ~~~':~~~~~·f_~.~:· ~i~~~)Çi '~;f~~~t;~3t:tf:' ~,';1j '. ,~.I""""".",. iI;' "', ÓNS"IN(;." ft=~~:,·;."':~;;~~':': E!, ""I''''', ~""", '." ...,.~".¡'" ~W%~~~}~~:~}!~$:~<~:;': ,~:~:":~;g,l~ ;~"" ~~:~;~~~jf.~~~;:~·~:~;:();;-~j,":..i.:i· .~~. \~::,:it'i' " ~/'_~~f~~~~~~~k~jš~:,: ~ œn'clúšl&i', ie'têìfwc ¡ISPôWät"a~íiœìi!ìid' raêni .. . .,.~__ -, ;\..;;:t.;"..;-..:-..,,'....._,-.;.... ;'~" .';"1.- ,,'! ~;,;" ~~ : "-&><;~:' " 'o)~_~.'r",",".è'I.:!'" '(#§þ';i.;;' !I~~~~ .:~' .' ..,-;. ',", ~'. :'! - ('. . _;0> ~>'":~,~..'\.. . ~ ,. . ~"'" ':;';:~",.·1 . :.'.'-" '/..... :.'!:.'." ',;:', .;"',., ,;;.' '.; ;;.~.:'~ . ... .r" ~, ·:·',;L..!". :1". :", '. C') '" ¡ 0 ~ :> w a: ~ ~ D- C') Q. ~ Q. ,.. ..... C\I N '" I' I ..! '-- HI --- '~ .,.-: ',:, >,J 1 \ ) B 14 B-1 '87"\ t / coO)..... I ¡'ì 's ~s S -28 /AT-a: : \' ~~AT-~¡--ìí-'~~-ì..tì ¡ I ,- ~ II ¡! I 'l' 1- I ~ ¡¡ I B,29 I AT-9;-) - - --~, ~/ ~ ~, B-10 / B-5 B,25 \ I , ~J N~ I ~7 , ~, ,- -¡ ~ ~ " ~ B-11\ I ì B,6 B-2 ,B-17 \ UT-6: I " " , I I \__iAT-4 \\ r--~I "'- '" \ 8' UT-51 ~-27 \ / A T-3 \ MW- \ I - B 26 I I E-1S E-1D - V-1 I I B-7 ; AT-2 B-23 V-2' FORMER \ - - AT 1 '/' r\ MW-5 ~ LEASE SITE \ -... BOUND~RY~ _ MW·2 J ~ \ ~ ~ B-24 ~ I B-13 \ B-8 8-3 I .. \ / \ / V-5.\ I'V'3 \ I \ I B-19~\ B-22 I~B-21 -$- B-9 I I 0- \ _ _ 1_ : / ,-'~ -'-'------, I . ,~/ .....- ,..". þ.' --- GEO WESTERN WAREHOUSE BUILDING LEGEND SANTA FE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ---- -$- B-8 ~--$- B-22 SOIL BORING 25' ANGLE SOIL BORING ~ MW-7 MONITORING WELL ("jAT-1 FORMER LOCATION OF ABOVEGROUND TANK ,-='1 UT,1 FORMER LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND TANK I I I I I I I RAILROAD TRACKS 1\V< {Çs I UvJicrJ N 1_ U.T~,~,,! -$- 8-18 ;,Y]"Y_' ;,_,U.T~~,_: ~ UT-12 ~ Œ(; {i C! UT-11 o BAKER TANK . POWER POLE L::] CONTAINER ~ MW-3 UJ :::> ::.c:: z ..J UJ « > ,:;: « IW z B-14 0 0 Ci5 Z A' :::> NORTH 0 10 NO 20 NO 30 NO 40 NO 50 NO 60 NO 70 NO 80 90 100 110 120 FOOTPRINT OF VADOSE ZONE PLUME ,.. SANTA FE PROPERTY 0 BOUNDARY 8 8' ~ i LOCATION OF CROSS SECTION j::.:::1 TPH > 100 mg/kg 14,000 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON . V-7 VES VENT WELL ~~ V-4 25' ANGLE VES VENT WELL @ E-1D YES EXTRACTION WELL Î~1 -C(3.'30 ,,^ Þ.,"(1 ÚA·~ B'12 V-1 MW-6 1 E-1S B-7 E-1D TH L OXIDIZER BLOWER I B-26 B-23 V- 9 B' EAST o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 '\l 100 ~~W--~W 110 120 130 ;;TO BLOWERffHERMAL OXIDIZER ~FORMERLEASESITE II. ~SANTAFE BOUNDARY ~ PROPERTY UNE B-20 ' B-3 MW-4 V-4 B-221 ,(Projected) r I ( E-2 'I' GEO WESTERN WAREHOUSE B WEST o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 ~""~~ 120 130 23 8 <5 8 14 --- B-5 (Projected B-4 E-1D B-6 E,1S (Projected) I r-r- A¡-IIA¡-I E-3 iï AJ- r V-8 IAT-I 1\ 1 I 7 I I I I -- :\~~ 15 21 14 10 19 i(TPH) BY EP A METHOD 418.1 <5 <5 FIGURE 7.2 VES PLAN AND DESIGN A SOUTH o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 o I 50 I SCALE FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY SITE SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENT AL SOLUTIONS, INC. 100 FEET 0"" TAbLE C.I ANALYTICAL RESULTS GROUND WATER SAMPLES - MW-7 FORMER NAVY OIL COMPANY SITE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA \ e e. EPA METHOD 8015M EPA METHOD 602 SAMPLE DAlE Extractable Volatile NO. Fuel (mgIL) Fuel Fuel (mgIL) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Hydrocarbons(l) Characterization Hydrocarbons(2) (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) MW7-1 5/12/93 110 C7 -C24 32 0.56 0.034 0.0051 0.006 MW7-2 5/19/93 39 C7 -C24 830 0.97 <0.3 <0.5 <0.5 MW7-3 5/26/93 51 C7 -C24 64 0.64 <0.3 <0.5 0.76 MW74 6/1/93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA " MW7-5 6/9/93 28 C7 -C22 230 1.1 J,/'" 1.2 <0.5 3.2 MW7 -6(3) 6/25/93 73 C8- 28 280 0.91 <0.3 <0.5 0.63 MW7 -8(3) 7/8/93 95 C7 -C22 130 0.67 <0.3 <0.5 <0.5 MW7-9 7/23/93 1,200 V' C7 -C22 1,600 0.41 <0.3 <0.5 1.5 MW7-1O 8/10/93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW7-11 8/25/93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MW7-12 10/21/93 16 C7 -C21 16 0.47 0.011 0.0058 0.16 MW7-13 11/22/93 3.0 NA 2.3 0.56 0.007 0.051 0.17 - - 2/22/93/mg) 92-247 (I) Extractable fuel hydrocarbons quantitated against a diesel standard (Cl -C30) - detection limit of 500 µg/L. (2) Volatile fuel hydrocarbons quantitated against a gasoline standard (C6-CI4) - detection limit of 50 µg/L. (3) Sample MW7-7 was not collected. ND = Not Detected. NA = Not Analyzed. ~ ~ i ~ F: C/J o E ..¡ Õ :2 C/J