Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES NO 35-89RESOLUTION NO. 35-89 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD PROPOSING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 333, ASHE NO. 1 ANNEXATION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MCCUTCHEN ROAD AND ASHE ROAD, CONTIGUOUS TO THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY LIMITS. (WARD 6) WHEREAS, the City of Bakersfield desires to propose a change of organization, to wit, the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the hereinafter-described territory, pursuant to Section 56800 of the Government Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield that it hereby finds and determines as follows: 1. That the City of Bakersfield hereby proposes the annexation to the City of Bakersfield of the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolu- tion as though fully set forth herein. 2. That a map of the territory proposed to be so annexed, marked Exhibit "B", is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein. 3. That a plan for providing services within the affected territory of the proposed annexation, in accordance with the provisions of Section 56653 of the Government Code, is marked as Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. 4. That this proposal for change of organization, to wit, annexation, is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and it is requested that proceedings be authorized for annexation in accordance therewith. 5. That the reason for the proposed change of organiza- tion is that the City of Bakersfield, as owner of the affected territory, desires to have the property converted to tax exempt status. 6. That for this proposed annexation and the zoning upon annexation, therefor, Ordinance No. 3201 New Series, which was adopted February 15, 1989, an Initial Study was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project would not have a sig- nificant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration was prepared and posted on December 2, 1988. 7. That the laws and regulations relating to the prepa- ration and adoption of Negative Declarations as set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Bakersfield Resolution No. 107--86 have been duly followed and the Negative Declaration for this proposed annexation is hereby approved and adopted. 8. That the territory proposed for annexation as described herein has been determined to be uninhabited pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 56046 of the Government Code. 9. That the names of the officers of the City of Bakersfield who are to be furnished with copies of the Executive Officer's Report and who are to be given mailed Notice of Hearing, if any, are: City Clerk City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 J. Dale Hawley City Manager City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Arthur J. Saalfield City Attorney City of Bakersfield 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 10. That the appropriate City officials shall file ten (10) copies of this Resolution, with Exhibits, with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kern County at 2700 "M" Streets. Suite 302, Bakersfield, California 93301. .......... o0o ......... I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on March 1, 1989 , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS' CHILDS. DeUI;)ND. SMITH. RATTY~ PET~.qSON. M¢OERMOTT ~ALVAGG10 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINING: COUNCiLMEMBERS: None-- ~-~,~ ..~.~ .,:,, CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the Council of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED March 1, 1989 CLARENCE E. MEDDERS MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield APPROVED as to form: ARTHUR J. SAALFI;~LD CITY ATTORNEY~f the Qity of Bakersfield AJS/meg Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "(2" A ANEX 5 AP.ASHEi.1 2/27/89 EXHIBIT "A" ASHE NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 333 A parcel of land situated in the County of Kern, State of California, containing all of Section 33, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, M.D.B. & M., excepting the North 1700 feet of the East 1700 feet, and excepting all public right of way for McCutchen Road, State Highway 119, Gosford Road, and Ashe Road, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the South line of the North 1700 feet and West line of the East 30 feet of said Section 33, said point also being on the existing Corporate Boundary of the City of Bakersfield; THENCE (1) departing from said Corporate Boundary continuing Southerly along said West line (also being the West right of way line of Ashe Road), a distance of 3542.66 feet to a point on the North right of way line of State Highway 119; THENCE (2) Westerly along said North right of way line, a distance of 5226.03 feet to a point on the East right of way line of Gosford Road; THENCE (3) Northerly along said East right of way line, a distance of 5225.24 feet to a point on the South right of way line of McCutchen Road; THENCE (4) Easterly along said South right of way line, a distance of 3533.82 feet to a point on the said Corporate Boundary; THENCE (5) Southerly and Easterly along various courses of said Corporate Boundary to the point of beginning. Containing 562.54 acres more or less. .......... by KERN CCL'i ;T'7 3.'Ji".'EU:D23 OF~!CF .......... R1.24.89 4 L.ANNEX333 JPB:mro -F, 30 $, Itl T..3'0 SEC..32 ~ ~ c, ~ ~' T.$O $. =S. 27 E. (§) / RO.B..~~ -F. 3© $, FL 2!7 E. m ROAD (2) -SEC, rL 27 R. 27 E. T. 30 27 -F. 30S. Fi. 2'7E. ANNEXATION OF ASHE No. I 4~'~---o 400 .oo ~o EXHIBIT "B" SERVICES Planning Parks and Recreation Library Police Protection Fire Protection Street Construction Maintenance Sweeping Lighting Flood Control Sewerage Water Other (REFUSE) PlAN FOR PROVIDING SERVICES ANNEXATION NO. 333 (ASHE NO.1) Agency Which Presently Check Services Which Indicate How Services Provided Provides Service City/District Will Provide By City/District will be Financed (i.e., general tax rate or special Upon Future Date assessment. ) Annexation ( specify ) COUNTY X GENERAL T~K REVENUES COUNTY N/A COUNTY N/A N/A SHERIFF & HIGH~AY PATROL X GENERAL TAX REVENUES No CITY/COUNTY JOINT AGREEMEN% CHANGE GENERAL TAX REVENUES COUNTY N/A COUNTY N/A COUNTY N/A NONE N/A N/A N/A COUNTY X GENERAL TAX REVENUES N/A N/A FRANCHISE COLLECTOR X USER FEE EXHIBIT "C" 4 :ANNEX333.1 I. Please provide the following information, when applicable, only for services which will be provided by the Location Indicate location frc~ which service will be provided (i.e. nearest fire station, library, etc.) applicant city. Police-All police services in the City of Bakersfield are administered threught the City Police Department located at the S/Wcorner of Truxtun Avenue and Eye Street about 9~miles northeast of the annexation. Fire-Station 52 (County) is within 4~miles at South Union and Barton Street. Parks and Recreation-N/A Library-N/A Streets-N/A Sewer-N/A Water On site argricultural projects, allow treated sewer water (secondary treatment) to be used for crop irrigation. Other(Refuse)-N/A Service Level Capacity Indicate frequency and availability of service (i.e., street sweeping, response time for emergency services, rec. prcx23rams, etc. 24 hour patrol is provided in the imm~di, ate vicinity of this annexation. First priority response is approximately 7.00 minutes or less. Fire protection is provided on a 24-hour basis and the annexation will not affect City/County joint service capability or response time. N/A N/A Adequate capacity exists. N/A 4:ANNEX333.2 RY:wrn III. What effects, if any, would annexation of this territory have on the existing level of city/district services (i.e., need for additional emer- gency service personnel or construction of new facilities, etc.)? The annexation of this territory will provide tax-exempt status by bein~ city- owned land within the corporate boundary and should have a positive effect on the cities capability to provide sewer service. IV. Would city/district require any upgrading or change in facilities to serve affected territory (roads, fire hydrants, mains, etc.): If so, would city/distruct or residents be responsible for financing? No upgrading or change in facilities are required because of annexation. Indicate and explain existing zoning in affected territory. Subject prop- erty is zoned A (Exclusive Agriculture) in the County. VI. Indicate and explain proposed prezoning in area. (List effects on present land use that would occur as a result of annexation such as maintenance of livestock on property, etc.) Proposed prezoning and amendment to the Bakersfield Metropolitan Area General Plan will consist of: A. Amendment to the Bakersfield ~tropolitan Area General Plan to add total area as Open Space. (GPA 3-88, Segment IV). B. Zoning Upon Annexation of total area to A (Agriculture). (Z.U.A. 4830) The existing use of the property would not be altered. 4:ANNEX333.3 -3- RTY:wrn VII. List city/district services that area will directly or indirectly benefit from such as decrease in fire insurance rate, shorter emergency response time, use of co~unity facilities, etc. City Police should be able to respond in a more timely manner than present County Sheriff and State Highway Patrol services. VIII. Please provide tk~ following information relative to city/district and county taxes: A. List existing tax rate(s) in area. The existing tax rate (as shown Kern County 1988-1989 tax rate schedule) in the area equals 1.029771% of assessed market value. This represents the total property tax rate. Would affected a~ea be subject to any bonded indebtedness of the city/district: ]if so, explain. U~on annexation, this area will convert to tax exempt status by being City-owned land within the City Corporate Boundary. How will the difference in tax rates affect a house with a market value of $50,000.00? N/A 4:ANNEX333.4 -4-