The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNDERGROUND TANK,+ , > ,J ~~~ ~, 1. ~ ~_ ~_ Apex Bulk Commodities 2111 Bricyn Ln ._ 4._.___~. -_-___. _. ____.. _ _.________.-- -- , \ -.; a California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Terry Tamminen Secretary for Environmental Protection Fresno Branch Office Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116· FAX (559) 445-5910 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor 13 October 2004 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Jim Fuller Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 92301 - UIT <2./ f I 'ßR.. IC l(N CASE CLOSURE - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY This letter confirms the completion of a site investigation and corrective action for the underground storage tank formerly located at the above-described location. Thank you for your cooperation through out this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tanles are greatly appreciated, Based on the information in the above-referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your 'underground storage tan1c site is in compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.3 of the Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release at the site is required, A summary of the information in the above-referenced file is included in the Case Closure Summary, a copy of which is enclosed. This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, Please contact Mr. Jolm M, Noonan at our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Enclosure cc: . Mr, Howard Wines ill, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakers~ Ms. Barbara Rempel, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr, Mark Magargee, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency o Recycled Paper , , ~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board \;;;;; Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116' FAX (559) 445-5910 )- TO: JOHN M, NOONAN Senior WRC Engineer FROM: JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist DATE: 130ctober2004 SIGNATIJRE: ~ fi:. (J~ _____'.______ __L_____ __ _ ____.______ _____._ 0: -. ______ ..-...,..-+ SUBJECT: CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, , KERN COUNTY Background Information The site formerly utilized one 12,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one fuel dispenser island. The site is approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. Depth to groundwater. ranged from 36 to 46 feet below ground surface (bgs) during 2001-2002 and approximately 18 feet bgs during 1999. Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the north. The diesel UST system was removed under the supervision of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) during January 1999, Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mglk:g or parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end ofthe UST, Benzene concentrations of 0.4 mg/kg or less, toluene and ethylbenzene concentrations less than 7 mglk:g and total xylene concentrations less than 35 mglk:g were _ _ .a1so detected. - The.fue1 ox~genate methyl-tert-butyl-ether-EM'FBE) was detected-at-concentrations 1ess- than 0.6 mg/kg, Site assessment was conducted during August 1999, Diesel range hydrocarbons were detected to 17 feet bgs in soil samples collected :trom near the western end ofthe former UST and north of the former UST. TPH-d up to 30,000 mg/kg and benzene up to 0,56 mg/kg were detected, The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined south and f;outhwest of the former UST, Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed in each soil boring, TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples. Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil were excavated from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs during August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soil, except in portions of the northern and eastern walls. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of the eastern wall. A TPH-d concentration of California Environmental Protection Agency o Recycled Paper ì Apex Bulk Commodities Closure Summary -2- 13 October 2004 530 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of280,000 µglL and a benzene concentration of9.4 µglL were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation. The CBFD referred the case to the Regional Board for regulatory oversight by a letter dated 28 November 2000, Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed during July 2001 and three groundwater monitoring events have subsequently been perfonned. TPH-d was detected at concentrations up to 2,100 µglL during the initial (23 August 2001) monitoring event and was detected at 240 µg/L during the last (26 March 2002) monitoring event. TPH-d was not detected in the downgradient monitoring well during two of the three monitoring events, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), and the lead scavengers 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) were not detected during the monitoring history. The site is within an area of commercial properties and vacant land parcels. Domestic water is supplied by City of Bakersfield municipal water system, Two municipal wells and several inactive water wells are within 1,000 feet of the site. The municipal wells draw water from depths in excess of 300 feet bgs, Conclusions I conclude that the total mass of residual hydrocarbons remaining in subsurface soils is small. Low concentrations of diesel range petroleum constituents remain in shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the fonner UST andhave'not migrated off-site, Benzene, ethylbenezene, xylenes, the fuel oxygenates, and the lead scavengeres were not detected during three groundwater monitoring events. Since the source of the release and most of the impacted soils have been removed, and residual hydrocarbon concentrations remaining in soil and groundwater have not migrated off-site, and are unlikely to pose a significant risk to potential environmental receptors, I recommend that a standard underground tank: site closure letter be mailed to the responsible parties. I also recommend that the groundwater monitoring wells remaining on-site be properly destroyed if they are not to be maintained for future use and that drums containing drill cuttings and purge water be removed for disposal. V:\UG1\Projects\JDW _files\2004 Correspolldellce\Cily of Bakersjield Cases\ApexBulkClsrMmo 9-04,doc 1. ~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board ~ Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116' FAX (559) 445-5910 13 October 2004 v~:WQC~-~ '3. -'7~ ßUCI::: O~~S~L: Mr. Charles H, Jimerson 19812 42nd Avenue Glendale, Arizona 85308-2291 -- CASE CLOSURE - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY This letter confinns the completion of a site investigation and corrective action for the underground storage tank fonnerly located at the above-described location. Thank you for your cooperation through out this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the fonner underground storage tanks are greatly appreciated. Based on the infonnation in the above-referenced file and with the provision that the infonnation provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank site is in compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.3 of the Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release at the site is required. A summary of the infonnation in the above-referenced file is included in the Case Closure Summary, a copy of which is enclosed. This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, Please contact Mr, John M. Noonan at our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. ÁHOMAS R, PINKOS () :xecut~ve Officer Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines ill, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bak~rs~ Ms, Barbara Rempel, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento - Mr. John Ivy, San Joaquin Bank, Bakersfield Mr. Michael Feldman, AJ Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper .' a California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair ,. Terry Tamminen Secretary for ' Environmental Protection Fresno Branch Office Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 4~5-5116' FAX (559) 445-59[0 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor TO: JOHN M. NOONAN Senior WRC Engineer . FROM: JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist -- . -- -,-.-- SIGNATURE:ak R dI~ -'-------- -. -.- _/- -~~--..---- ._--- ~ "-- DATE: 13 October 2004 SUBJECT: CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, FORMER HOLDEN TRUCK PLAZA, 3775 BUCK OWENS BOULEVARD, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY Background Information The site was developed as a tmck stop in the late 1940s. The site is approximately 3,000 feet west of the . Kern River approximately 2,700 feet southwest of a Kern County Water Authority recharge pond, and approximately 1,200 feet southwest ofthe Calloway Canal. Two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, two 12,000-gallon diesel USTs, and associated dispensers and piping were installed in the area of a fonner UST cluster during 1985 and were taken out of service prior to 1998. The Bakersfield Fire Department (BFD) learned of the existence ofunpennitted nonoperating USTs at the site and required UST system upgrades or removals in a letter dated 12 October 1998. The USTs were removed on 30 October 2000, One 3,000-gallon waste oil UST was removed on 4 December 2000, The presence of a 12,000-gallon diesel UST in the southern portion of the site was mentioned in site records but was-not discovered by--handoaugering; 'Fotal-petroleum hydrocarbons-as diesel (TPH;;d) was detected in samples collected beneath the middle and west ends of the south diesel tanlc, the west and east ends and middle of the north diesel UST, the three diesel dispensers, and the waste oil UST during the 2000 UST removals. TPH as heavy oil was also detected in the sample collected from the waste oil UST, In a letter dated 24 January 2001, the BFD required further assessment to detennine the lateral and' vertical extent of impacted soils. The CBFD referred the case to the Regional Board by a letter dated 5 March 2001. In a letter dated 26 Janumy 2001, the KCEHSD required the removal of the 12,000-gallon diesel UST reportedly still on-site. The UST was located in the southern portion of the site and was removed on 18 July 2001. A significant fuel release was not discovered during subsequent assessment beneath this fonner UST, California Environmental Protection Agency #I) ~~ Recycled Paper 1 Former Holden Truck Plaza Closure Summary - 2 - 13 October 2004 Site assessment conducted during June and December 2001 identified and determined the extent of three soil plumes impacted by diesel fuel. The largest plume, in the northern portion of the site at the former UST cluster, was elongated toward the west by downgradient transport of hydrocarbons on the water table. This plume extended vertically to approximately 39 feet bgs and had an estimated volume of 2,000 cubic yards. TPH-d concentrations up to 22,000 mg/kg were detected within this plume. The second and third plumes were beneath former and present fuel dispenser islands, respectively. The second plume extended to 20 feet bgs, had an estimated volume of 400 cubic yards, and a maximum detected TPH-d concentration of 8,000 mg/kg. The third plume extended to 13 feet bgs, had an estimated volume of 50 cubic yards and a maximum detected TPH-d concentration of28,000 mg/kg. The soil plumes were excavated during August and September 2003. Approximately 12,000 cubic yards of soil were initially removed and stockpiled on-site, Approximately 4,800 cubic yards of the soil was determined to be contaminated and was transported off-site for disposal. The remaining soil and clean fill material from off-site were used to backfill the excavations. Compaction testing was performed during backfill placement. TPH-d was not detected or was detected at low concentrations in confirmation samples collected from the excavation, confirming that most of the impacted soil had been removed. Four groundwater monitoring wells have been installed on-site, Seven quarterly groundwater monitoring events were conducted prior to soil excavation, TPH-d concentrations detected in groundwater in a monitoring well within the largest area of impacted soil ranged from 640 to 5,400 micrograms per liter µg/L. TPH-d concentrations in a monitoring well downgradient of this soil ranged from 340 to 4,400 µg/L. Two semiannual monitoring events were conducted after soil remediation. TPH-d concentrations in groundwater detected in the well within impacted area ranged from 400 to 480 µg/L. TPH-d concentrations detected in the downgradient well ranged from 990 to 1,400 µgIL. Gasoline constituents and polynuclear aromatic compounds (P AHs) were occasionally detected at very low concentrations during the monitoring history, The site is within an area of commercial properties along the east side of the State Highway 99 right-of- way, Domestic water is supplied by City of Bakersfield municipal water system. Active water supply wells were not identified within 1,000 feet of the site. Conclusions I conclude that the total mass of residual hydrocarbons remaining in subsurface soils is small. Low concentrations of diesel range petroleum constituents remain in shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the former UST. Since the source of the release and impacted soils have been removed, and residual hydrocarbon concentrations remaining in soil and groundwater and are unlikely to pose a significant risk to potential environmental receptors, I recommend that a standard underground tanlc site closure letter be mailed to the responsible parties. I also recommend that the groundwater monitoring wells remaining on-site be properly destroyed if they are not to be maintained and that any remaining drums containing drill cuttings or purged groundwater be removed from the site for disposal. v:\UG1\Projects\IDW _fiJes\2004 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\HoldenTruck Closure mo 9-04,doc BUSINESS/DEAPRTMENT NAME: 7__ ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT COMPLETION: DATE: Recording Requested by: THOMAS C; FALLGATTER After Recording Mail to: THOMAS C. FALLGATTER, Lawyer Suite 448 Bank of America Building 1430 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 DON RICHARDSON SUPERVISOR I 1000 BUENA VISTA RD. PHONE 805/326-3'115 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93311 DISPATCH 805/326-3?46 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS FOR BRICYN LANE A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Section 1.09. Beneficiary. "Beneficiary" shall mean a mortgagee under a mortgage or a beneficiary under a deed of trust, as the case may be, and the assignees of such mortgagee or beneficiary. Sectio~ 1.10. Board of Directors or Board, and Director. "Board of Directors" or "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the As- sociation, elected in accordance with the By-Laws of the Association. "Director" shall mean any member of the Board of Directors. Section 1.11. By-Laws. "By-Laws" shall mean the By-Laws of Lhe Association~ which have been or will be adopted by the Board, initially in the form of Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, as such By-Laws may be amended by the Members of the As- sociation from time to time. Sectioh 1.12. Close of Escrow. "Close of Escrow" shall mean the date on which a deed is recorded conveying a Lot in the Properties. Section 1.13. Common Area. "Common Area" shall mean Lot 15 of Parcel Map No. 4104, and the drainage sump and any other improvements located thereon. Section 1.14. Commqn Expenses. "Co,non Expenses shall mean the actual and estimated costs of maintenance, management, operation, re- pair and replacement of the Common Area (including .unpaid Special As- sessments, Reconstruction Assessments, and Capital Improvement Assess- ments), including those costs not paid by the Owner responsible for pay- ment; the costs of any con~nonly metered utilities and other commonly metered charges for the Properties; the costs of management and admin- istration of the Association, including but not limited to compensation paid by the Association to managers, accountants, attorneys and other employees; the costs of all utilities, gardening, trash pick-up, and other services benefiting the Common Area; the costs of fire, casu. alty, and liability insurance, worker's compensation insurance, and other in- surance covering the Properties; the costs of bonding the members of the management body; and taxes paid by the Association. Section 1.15. Declaration. "Declaration" shall mean this instru- ment as it may be amended from time to time. Section 1.16. Deed of Trust. "Deed of Trust" shall mean a mort- gage or a deed of trust as the case may be. Section 1.17. Grantor. "Grantor" shall mean, collectively, ROBERT BROSSARD and NANCE BROSSARD, husband and wife, their successors, and any person or persons to which said Grantor shall have assigned any rights hereunder by express_~w~itte__n_a~signment.- Section 1.18. ~rovement(s). "Improvement" or "Improvements" shall mean a~l structures and appurtenances thereto of every type and kind, including but not limited to buildings, outbuildings, walkways, sprinkler pipes, garages, open parking areas, roads, driveways, parking areas, fences, screening walls, retaining walls, stairs, de~ks, land- scaping, antennae, hedges, windbreaks, plantings, planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, exterior air conditioning and water softener fix- tures or equipment. Section 1.19. Lot. "Lot" shall mean any lot or parcel of land shown upon any recorded subdivision map or recorded parcel map of the Properties, with the exception of the Common Area. --3-- Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Declaration, until (1) a Notice of Completion of a Dwelling Unit has been Recorded, or (2) one hundred twenty (!20) days from the date of issuance of a building permit for the Dwelling Unit, whichever occurs first, each Owner (includ- ing Grantor) of a Dwelling Unit shall be exempt from paying that por- tion of any Annual Assessment which is for the purpose of paying expens- es and reserves directly attributable to the existence and use of the Dwelling Unit. Such exemption may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, the following: walkway lights and refuse disposal. Section 6.03. Supplemental Annual Assessments. In the event the Board of Directors shall determine that the estimate of total charges for the current year is, or will become, inadequate to meet all expenses of the Properties for any reason, it shall immediately determine the ap- proximate amount of such inadequacy. Subject to the provisions of Sec- tion 6.06 below, the Board shall have the authority to levy, at any time by a majority vote, a supplemental Annual Assessment reflecting a revi- sion of the total charges to be assessed against each Lot. In no event shall the sum of all increases in Annual Assessments levied by the Board in any fiscal year (including all supplemental Annual Assessments levied pursuant to this Section 6.03 and increases authorized pursuant to Sec- tion 6.06) exceed the maximum Annual Assessment for the previous fiscal year by more than twenty percent (20%), unless such excess increase has first been approved by tile vote or written assent of Members represent- ing seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of the Association. Written notice of any change in the amount of the Annual Assessment lev- ied by the Association through the Board shall be given to all Members not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such change. Section 6.04. Maintenance Funds of Association. The Board of Directors shall establish no fewer than two (2) separate accounts (the "Maintenance Funds") into which shall be deposited all monies paid to the Association, and from which disbursements shall be made, as provid- ed herein, in the performance of functions by the Association under the provisions of this Declaration. The Association shall initially have two (.2) Maintenance Funds into which the two (2) elements of the Annu- al Assessments shall be deposited. These are: (1) an Operating Fund for current expenses of the Association, and (2) a Reserve Fund for re- placements and repairs (which would not reasonably be expected to recur on an annual or less frequent basis) of the Common Area to the extent necessary under the provisions of this Declaration. The Board shall not commingle any amounts deposited into any of the Association's Mainte- nance Funds with one another. All accounts of the Association, check- ing or savings, shall be trust accounts. Nothing contained herein shall limit, preclude, or impair the establisllment of additional Maintenance Funds by the Association, so long as the amounts assessed to, deposited into, and disbursed from any such Fund are earmarked for specified pur- poses authorized by 'this Declaration. Section 6.05. Purpose of Annual Assessments. The Annual Assess- ments levied by the Association sh~l~ ~u!e._d. Dxclusively-for the im- -- provement and-maintenance of'-the Common Area, as provided herein, and for the enforcement of the provisions of this Declaration. Section 6.06. Basis of Maximum Annual Assessment. The maximum Annual Assessment assessible by the Association shall be subject to the following provisions: (1) Initial Fiscal Year. During 1980 and 1981, the maximum Annual Assessment per Lot will be One Hundred ~wenty and no/100 Dollars ($ 120.00 ). -9- The Board shall also make the reports provided for in this Section. The following financial reports shall be prepared as indicated~ and dis- tributed to all Members within a reasonable time after their prepara- tion. The required financial reports are as follows: (1) An annual report consisting of the following, which shall be distributed within one hundred twenty (120) days after the close of the fiscal year: (a) A balance sheet as of the end of the fiscal year. (.b) An operating (income) statement for the fiscal year. (c) A statement of changes in financial position for the fiscal year. (d) Any information required to be re- ported under Section 8322 of the Corporations Code. (2) A pro forma operating statement (budget) for each fiscal year, which shall be distributed ,~ot less than sixty (60) days before the .beginning of 'the fiscal year. (A copy of the initial budget of the Association, as filed with 'the California Department of Real Estate, reflecting in part the quality level of maintenance to be performed upon the Conunon Area, is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "D," and incorporated by this reference.) Section 6.11. Exempt Property. The following property subject to this Declaration shall be exempt from the Assessments herein: (1) All Properties dedicated to and accepted by a local public authority; and (2) The Common Area owned by the Association in fee. Section 6.12. Certificate of Assessment Status. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by an officer or agent of the Association setting forth the cur- rent Assessments of the Association and.indicating whether the Assess- ments on a specified Lot have been paid. A properly executed certifi- cate of the Association as to the status of Assessments against a Lot is binding upon the Association as of the date of its issuance. ARTICLE VII EFFECT OF NONPAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS; REMEDIES OF THE ASSOCIATION Section 7.01. Effect of NonpaymenA of~As-sessments; Remedies of the Association. Any installment of an Annual Assessment, Capital Improvement Assessment, Special Assessment, or Reconstruction Assess- ment not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at the maximum rate allowable by law. If any such installment on an Assessment is not paid within thirty (30) days after it is due, the Owner responsible therefor may be required further by the Board of Directors to pay a late charge of Five Dol- lars ($5.00) or five percent (5%) of the amount of the delinquent in- stallment, whichever is greater. The Association may bring an actio~ at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the Lot. No Owner may waive or otherwise -11- features. The ARC's approval or disapproval shall be based solely on the considerations set forth in this Article VIII, and the ARC shall not be responsible for reviewing, nor shall its approval of any plan or design be deemed approval of, any plan or design from the standpoint of structural s. afety or conformance with building or other codes. Section 8.08. Variances. The ARC may authorize variances from compllance with any of the architectural provisions of this Declaration, including without limitation restrictions upon height, size, floor area, placement of structures, or similar restrictions, when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or envi- ronmental consideration may require. Such variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at least a majority of the ARC, and shall become effective upon Recordation. If such variances are granted, no violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to tile matter for which the variance was granted. The granting of such a var- iance shall-not operate to waive any of the terms and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to the particular property and particular provision hereof covered by the variance, nor shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all government- al laws and regulations affecting the use of his Dwelling Unit, includ- ing but not limited to zoning ordinances and lot setback lines or re- quirements imposed by any governmental authority. ARTICLE IX MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OBLIGATIONS Section 9.01. Maintenancc Obligahions of Owners. Subject to the duty o--{ the Associatl-~% to provide for maintenance as provided in Sec- tion 9.02 below, it shall be the duty of each Owner, at his sole cost and expense, subject to the provisions of this Declaration regarding ARC approval, to maintain, repair, replace and restore all Improvements located on his Lot, and the Lot itself, in a neat, sanitary, and attrac- tive condition. In the event any Owner shall permit any Improvement the maintenance of which is the responsibility of such Owner to fall in- to disrepair or not to be so maintained, so as to create a dangerous, obstructed, unsafe, unsightly or unattractive condition, or to otherwise violate this Declaration, the Board shall have either the right to seek any remedies at law or in equity which it may have or the right but not the duty, after Notice and Hearing as provided in the By-Laws, to enter upon such Owner's Lot to make such repairs or to perform such mainte- nance; and the cost thereof shall be charged to the Owner. Said cost shall be a Special Assessment, and shall create a lien enforceable in the same manner as other Assessments as set forth in this Declaration. Section 9.02. Maintenance Qbl.~ations of Association. No Improve- ment,-excavation, or work which in any way alters the Common Area from its existing state on the date any such Area is conveyed by Grantor to the Association, or a purchaser of a Lot, shall be made or done by any Person other than the Association or its authorized agents. Subject to the provisions of Section 9.03 below and Section 6.05 of Article VI, tile Association shall maintain or provide for the maintenance of all of the Common Area and all Improvements thereon, including all landscaping and private irrigation systems, sewers, and storm drains, in good order and repair. Each Owner shall maintain, repair, and replace the land- scaping located on his individual Lot, if any. All of the foregoing ob- ligations of the Association shall be discharged when and in such manner as the Board of Directors shall determine in its judgment to be appro- priate. -16- Declaration, and shall contain either a covenant that the lessee or ten- ant agrees to perform and comply with the restrictions herein or ade- quate provisions to permit entry and other actions by the lessor for the purpose of performing and complying with these restrictions. Any fail- ure by the lessee of such Lot to comply with the terms of this Declara- tion, the By-Laws, or the Rules and Regulations of the Association shall constitute a default under the lease. Section 10.06. .Dr.ainac~_e.. There shall be no interference with the established drainage pattern over any Lot within the Properties, unless an adequate alternative provision is made for proper drainage. For the purposes hereof, "established" drainage is defined as the drainage which exists at the time such Lot is conveyed to a purchaser from the Grantor, which may include drainage from the Common Area over any Lot or Lots in the Properties. ARTICLE XI DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION, OR CONDEMNATION OF COMMON AREA Damage to, destruction of, or condemnation of all or any portion of the Common Area shall be handled in the following manner: (1) In the event of damage or destruction to the Comm,%on Area, the Association shall cause such Co,non Area to be repaired and reconstructed substantially as it previously existed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the drainage pro- vided by the Common Area can be adequately provided in some other manner which is less expensive than the repair or replace- ment of the Conunon Area, and s'uch alternative is acceptable to the City of Bakersfield, the Board of Directors may, by two- thirds (2/3) vote of its members, elect to not repair and/or reconstruct tile Co,unon Area but to take such alternative action as may be approved by the City of Bakersfield. (2) Each Member shall be liable to the Association for any damage to the Common Area not fully reimbursed to the Association by insurance proceeds which may be sustained by rea- son of the negligence or willful misconduct of said Member or of his respective Family, guests, tenants and invitees, both minor and adult. The Association reserves the right, acting through the 'Board, after Notice and Hearing, to (a) determine whether any claim shall be made upon the insurance maintained by the Association, and (b) charge a Special Assessment equal to the increase, if any, in the insurance premium directly attri- butable to the damage caused by such Member or the persons for whom such Member may be liable as described herein. In the case of co-ownership of a Lot, the liability of such Owners shall be joint and several, except to the extent that the Association has previously contracted in writing wit]] such-Co-Owners to the con~- trary. After Notice and Hearing, the cost of correcting such damage, to the extent not reimbursed to the Association by in- surance, shall be a Special Assessment against the Lot, and may be collected as provided herein for the collection of Annual Assessments. (3) If at any time all or any portion of the Com- mon Area, or any interest therein, be taken for any public or quasi-public use, under any statute, by right of eminent domain or by private purchase in lieu of eminent domain, the award in -18- condemnation shall be paid to the Association. Any such award payable to the Association shall be deposited in the Operating Fund. No Member shall be entitled to participate as a party, or otherwise, in any.proceedings relating to such condemnation. The Association shall have the exclusive right to participate in such proceedings and shall, in its name alone, represent the interests of all Members. ARTICLE XII INSURANCE Section 12.01. Casua. lt~ Insurance. The Association shall keep all Improvements and fixtures of the Common Area insured against loss or dam- age by fire for the full insurance replacement cost thereof, and may ob- tain insurance against such other hazards and casualties as the Associ- ation may deem desirable. The Association may also insure any other property, whether real or personal, owned by the Association against loss or damage by fire, and such other hazards as the Association may deem desirable, with the Association as the owner and beneficiary of such insurance. The insurance coverage with respect to the Common Area shall be written in the name of, and the proceeds thereof shall be pay- able to, the Association. Insurance proceeds shall be used by the As- sociation'for the repair or replacement of the property for which the insurance was carried. Premiums for all insurance carried by the Asso- ciation are Common Expenses included in the Annual .Assessments made by the Association. Section 12.02. ~eplacement or Repair of Property. In the event of damage to or destruction of any part of the Common Area Improvements, the Association shall repair or replace the same from the insurance pro- ceeds available. If such proceeds are insufficient to cover the costs of repair.or replacement of the property damaged or destroyed, the Asso- ciation may levy a Reconstruction Assessment against all Owners to cover the additional cost of repair or replacement not.covered by the insur- ance proceeds, in addition to any other Annual Assessments made against such Owners, in accordance with the provisions of Article VI, Section 6.07, and Article XI of this Declaration. Section 12.03. Liability and Other Insurance. The Association shall have the power and duty to, and shall, obtain comprehensive pub- lic liability insurance, including medical payments and malicious mischief, in such limits as it shall deem desirable, insuring against liability for bodily injury, death, and property damage arising from the activities of the Association or with respect to property under its jurisdiction, including, if obtainable, a cross-liability endorse- ment insuring each insured against liability to each other insured. The Association may also obtain, through the Board, worker's compensation insurance and. other liability insurance as it may deem desirable, insur- ing each Owner and the Association, the Board, and the Manager from lia- bility in connection with the Common Area, the premiums for which are a Conm~on Expense included in the Annual Assessments made against the Owners. All insurance policies shall be reviewed at least annually by the Board and the limits increased in its discretion. The Board may al- so obtain such errors and omissions insurance, indemnity bonds, fidelity bonds, and other insurance as it deems advisable, insuring 'the Board, the officers of the Association, and the Manager against any liability for any act or omission in carrying out their obligations hereunder or resulting from their membership on the Board or on any committee thereof. -19- (;ONSI'B'~:;J N~': ~ ONE; SHEET 'IN THE CITY OF BAK~SFIELD ': and oil i~ir~ ~ov~i~s of the S~division Mq3 Ad. ;',,. ~ CIT I EER ~ County R~order : '"; ' ',' "'~ Uniess oth'er~ise indicoled oll diston~s'ond'.'dimen~ion~ "~ ~ ~, ~'K ,.:-. Delmorter' FLC ,, . E, 17564 ~ LI~:, ~ ~E ~O~E~ ~4~ ~055 LY ' RtGHT-OF-~A~ VhU_~"~NhL ' shown hereon ore in feet and d~cimols .thereof.' ' ' ~'~ ·. " I~ P~L MI~P ~0~ I~, ~T ~QG ~ IN.:. The ~q border indicote~ the b~u~dories of the land " ' O~J~ (~ 7~ ~U~'~~ ~d~b subdivided by this mop. - ' · . . . . ., .,.. " ".t-:':. -- : - -' ~.. {~ 'L ~ ~- ~'ZZ' ~'. ' E= ~5' ; ~ ~' '>T=t~.~' .%, . m~ ~:~' a- m.4&' ~,"- ff~ i?~ ':~'L~ ~. ~;~ T- 11.$0", ':J:~" ~: ~'. ':' 'f':'' ,:~ 5= O~OTIS' W=IO'.' ~- H.I~' T=5,~' .~'. [:)i', ?F:::'"' [2': " ~ ?:;' ~.'....,[.L ~-- - J ' '~ lB., .. :.....':?~ g~' .G~ . . '-,. ,. -j ~o~.~. ! ,,. I1 ' ,,~. , . : . ' ']. ~"~'os'm '~m.9z' . [..~,. . ,.,:, '' [: ~'~' "" I0 ~ .... : .. =. ,.~'-.. , ~ -'" X '- ..,~'' .~..,.:....', . . ,, ~ . ~,~.~. ..'. .' t' r.. .,' . . ~ __ 2 ,. . , :~. ~ .', ;; '.. .: - .j: ,. , . .....'¢, ~...~ . . ' ~ I . ,~ ., ,,:.,. f?,':-'.,· ...~.. =~'"~... .... . .... _ ' . · , ' .'. '. -." '. ,e~ ,~,~9~.~. : , . "",-"; ", :-"".. ~ ' .,1:~-. Q ' 9 '.:.' ::; :.... :.:,' ~:~.~' - '~'.. ID,~'~.~. '-. ,' . · , ~'~ :" ' .... . . ~ .. ... ~.~' . I ~: .,. '.', ~ '.., ~' ~o · ~ .,. '//~'. . . .. ..... . ." &. - ,. -.,. ..,= ~-' j::;.. ..: ', . ~¢ ~ ', " - ,.. ?~I~ G~.~ CS~P LOT) ,;' '~ -' ., " ' ' 25,~ ~.~,/" ~ 1~5.~' . "' ' Z45.l~' ,,' '. ' · iJs,~' ~5i,~' / . ' . 4 .... ~ . , .. J ~.:' .', ,_..~? CITY OF BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT :FICEOF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 CHESTER AVENUE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93301 D FIIIE November 8, 1999 Mr. James Fuller F~,E C.~E~ Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. RON FRAZE P.O. Box Drawer A ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Adelanto, Ca 92301 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 RE: New Landowner Notification and Participation Requirements SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Fuller: 2101 'H' Street Bakemfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805)395-1349 This letter is to inform you of new legislative requirements pertaining to cleanup and closure of sites where an unauthorized release of PREVEN3qON SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. hazardous substance, including petroleum, has occurred from an Bakersfield. CA 93301 underground storage tank (UST). Section 25297.15(a) of Ch, 6.7 of the VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 Health & Safety Code requires the primary or active responsible party to ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES notify all current record owners of fee title to the site off I) a site cleanup 1715 Chester Ave. proposal, 2) a site closure proposal, 3) a local agency intention to make a Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 determination that no further action is required, and 4) a local agency FAX (805) 326-0576 intention to issue a closure letter. Section 25297.15(b) requires the local 'tRAiNING DM$10. agency to take all responsible steps to accommodate responsible 5r~2 W~to, Av~. landowners' participation in the cleanup or site closure process and to Bakersfield. CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 consider their input and recommendations. FAX (805) 399-5763 For purposes of implementing these sections, you have been identified as the primary or active responsible party. Please provide to this agency, within twenty (20) calend~ days of receipt of this notice, a complete mailing list of ail current record owners of fee title to the site. You may use the enclosed list of landowners form (sample letter 2) to comply with this requirement. If the list of current record owners of fee title to the site changes, you must notify the local agency of the change within twenty (20) calendar days from when you are notified of the change. If you are the sole landowner, please indicate that on the landowner list form. The following notice requirements do not apply to responsible parties who are the sole landowner for the site. In accordance with Section 25297.15(a) of Ch 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, you must certify to the local agency that all current record owners of fee title to the site have been informed of the proposed action before the local agency may do any of the following: 1) consider a cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) 2) consider a site closure proposal 3) make a determination that no further action is required 4) issue a closure letter You may use the enclosed notice of proposed action form (sample letter 3) to comply with this requirement. Before approving a cleanup proposal or site closure proposal, determining that no further action is required, or issuing a closure letter, the local agency will take all reasonable steps necessary to accommodate responsible landowner participation in the cleanup and site closure process and will consider all input and recommendations from any responsible landowner. Sincerely, ~o~ Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Enviromental Services REI-I/dm enclosures ~ · S:\USTFORMS\UST.L4 Sample Letter (2): List of Land'ers Form Date: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Certified List of Record Fee Title Owners for Site name Site address Fill out item 1 if there are multiple site landowners. If you are the sole site landowner, skip item 1 and fill out item 2. 1. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Chapter 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible party certify that the following is a complete list of cun'ent record fee title owners and their mailing addresses for the above site: 2. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible party certify that I am the sole landowner for the above site. Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible party Name of pr/mary responsible party Sample Letter (3) Notice Action Submitted to Local Agency Date: City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Notice of Proposed Action Submitted to Local Agency for Site name Site address In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, , certify that I have notified all Name of primar~ responsible party responsible landowners of the enclosed proposed action. Check space for applicable action(s): cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) site closure proposal local agency intention to make a determination that no further action is required. local agency intention to issue a closure letter. Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible parly Name of prima~ responsible party CC.' (Names and addresses of all record fee title owners) HOLL IN, FAHAN & AS ' )CIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS September 24, 1999 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (BFDESD PERMIT #BR-0247) Dear Mr. Wines: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) is pleased to present the following Preliminary Site Assessment Report for the above-referenced site. The drilling, soil, and groundwater sampling activities were conducted to further delineate the extent of diesel-containing soil detected during the removal of the fueling facilities at the above-referenced site and to assess the potential for the release to impact groundwater resources. Based upon the results of this preliminary site assessment, this report presents a proposed remedial action plan for the excavation of the most-saturated diesel-containing soils and the off-site disposal of the excavated soils at a licensed recycling facility. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 2111 Bricyn Lane in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site is located within the commercial/industrial district, which flanks Rosedale Highway (State Highway 58). The site is at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography is relatively fiat with a slight slope to the west-southwest. The site is located within the southeastern quarter of the northwestern quarter of Section 26, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, MDBM. Formerly located at the property were one 12,000-gallon gasoline UST and a single dispenser. Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan). ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS · ENGINEERS Contaminated Site Assessments · Phase I Audits ° Site Remediation * Hazardous Waste Management 143 South Figueroa Street 16570 Aston Street 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite I 3001 Soulh 35th Street, Suite C-11 Ventura. California 93001 Irville, California 92606 Bakersfield, California 93308 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (805) 652-0219 (949) 442-6665 (805) 391-0517 (800) 789-0219 · (602) 426-1000 (805) 652-0793 FAX (949) 724-0446 FAX (805) 391-0826 FAX (602) 426-0113 FAX lnternel: first_last@hfa,com lnternet: first_last@hfa.com' Internet: first_last@hfa.com Internet: firstJast@ph.hfa.com HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAHAN September 24, 1999- Page 2 & IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS The property owner contact is Mr. James H. Fuller, Compliance Manager, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., 12531 Violet Road, Adelanto, California, 92301, (760) 246-6077. The consultant contact is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. SITE BACKGROUND PREVIOUS WORK On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, under Permit #BR-0247 with the Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division (BFDESD). Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil. samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST (see Attachment 1 for a summary of previous work). Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, the BFDESD, in its letter dated March 30, 1999, requested a preliminary site assessment to determine the vertical and lateral limits of diesel-containing soils and assess the potential for the release to impact groundwater resources. HFA prepared a work plan, dated June 30,' 1999, to perform the requested work, which was subsequently approved for implementation by the BFDESD, in its letter dated July 8, 1999. HFA performed the drilling and sampling activities on August 4, 1999. The results of the requested site investigation are presented in this report. SITE GEOLOGY The site is located at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography slopes slightly to the west-southwest (see Figure 1). The subject site is located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake-bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 50,000 fbg (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). At the subject site, surface deposits consist of Quaternary (recent) unconsolidated alluvium overlying Quaternary (Pleistocene) nonmarine sediments. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments that form a homocline dipping gently to the HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill BFDESD FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 - Page 3 & ASSE IATES, INC. ENVII::IONMENT*C~,L M.~NAGEMENT CONE~ULT,~NTE~ west-southwest, The deposits are alluvium consisting of indurated and dissected fan deposits (CDMG, 1965). Surface soils are classified by the Soils Conservation Services as Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex and are characterized as 35 percent Kimberlina fine, sandy loam with moderate permeability; 30 percent Urban land with impervious surfaces and altered fills; and 20 percent Cajon loamy sand with high permeability. SITE HYDROGEOLOGY The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The GreatValley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east and are transported by five major rivers, the closest to the site being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. The depth to the regional, unconfined aquifer is approximately 20 fbg, and the groundwater gradient is to the west-northwest, away from the Kern River (Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), 1998, 1997 Report on Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4, February 1, 1998). Perched groundwater is known to be present flanking the current course of the Kern River, but is not known to extend to the site (KCWA, 1998, 1995 Water Supply Report, January 1998). SITE EVALUATION METHODS The intent of this report is to present the methodologies used to assess the vertical and lateral extents of diesel-containing soil and to determine the possibility of groundwater contamination resulting from the release of hydrocarbons from the former UST at the APEX Bulk Commodities property. Four soil borings were drilled during this phase of soil investigation. Soil boring B-1 was drilled to a depth of 20 fbg adjacent to the former location of the western (turbine) end of the 12,000-gallon diesel UST to assess the vertical limit of diesel-containing soil in the area of this potential release. Soil boring B-2 was drilled to a depth of 20 fbg adjacent to the former location of the dispenser to assess the vertical limit of diesel-containing soil in the area of this potential release. Soil borings B-3 and B-4 were drilled to a depth of 20 fbg at locations to assess the lateral distribution of diesel hydrocarbons (see Figure 2 for the soil boring locations and Attachment 2 for the logs of exploratory borings). ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill ~ BFDESD FAF[AN September 24, 1999 - Page 4 ~ & ASSOC~T~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS SOIL INVESTIGATION AND SAMPLING RESULTS Prior to conducting the current assessment, underground utilities such as water, electricity, and sewer were mapped by Underground Service Alert of Northern California. HFA performed the drilling and sampling on August 4, 1999, using a MobileTM B-53 drill rig operated by Melton Drilling Company of Bakersfield, California. Soils encountered during drilling included silty sands to coarse-grained sands to the total depth of each soil boring. Because groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 18 fbg in each soil boring, the soil borings were installed as temporary well points, and HydropunchTM-type groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring (see Attachment 2 and Attachment 3 for the soil boring and sampling procedures). Soil and groundwater samples were submitted to HFA Environmental Laboratories, a California state-certified laboratory, for analysis. A total of 14 soil samples was analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020, and 4 groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) (see Table 1 - Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results, Table 2-Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results, and Attachment 4 for the laboratory report). Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-1 to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, and in the downgradient soil boring B-3 in the capillary fringe soils immediately above groundwater. Minor adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the near-surface soil samples collected from upgradient soil boring B-4. Adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-2 drilled through the location of the former dispenser. Trace to nondetectable adsorbed-phase BTEX and MTBE concentrations were observed in the 14 soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis (see Figure 3 - TPH as Diesel/Benzene/MTBE Concentrations in Soil, Table 1, and Attachment 4). Dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentrations in excess of the CCR Title 22 MCL were detected in the groundwater samples collected from the four temporary well points reaching a maximum dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentration of 80,000 pg/I in the groundwater sample collected from downgradient soil boring B-3 (see Figure 4- TPH as Diesel Concentrations in Groundwater, Table 2, and Attachment 4). HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill FAHAN BFDESD ~ & A~SOCIATE.%,__ INC. September 24, 1999- Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS CONCLUSIONS 1. Based upon the laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected during the tank removal and recent drilling activities, diesel hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the 12,000-gallon diesel UST to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, and downgradient of the UST in the capillary fringe soils. Trace to nondetectable BTEX and MTBE concentrations were detected in the 14 soil samples collected from the four soil borings. The BFDESD will likely not require additional assessment of the vertical and lateral limits of diesel concentrations in the soil at the site. 2. Based upon the laboratory analytical results of the groundwater samples collected during the recent drilling activities, diesel hydrocarbon concentrations were detected in the groundwater samples collected from all four soil borings drilled at the site. The E~FDESD will likely require additional assessment of the lateral limits of diesel concentrations in the groundwater at the site. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. HFA recommends that the client submit an application to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)/Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF) for reimbursement of all future costs (less applicable deductible) associated with the assessment and active remediation of the diesel release at the site. HFA is available to assist the property owner in preparing the SWRCB/USTCF claim application. 2. HFA recommends that excavation and off-site disposal of the most saturated diesel-containing soils is the most cost-effective mitigatiOn measure to reduce the concentration of diesel-containing soil and groundwater at the site. HFA recommends that the most saturated diesel-containing soils be excavated to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg centered on the western (turbine) end of the former UST and laterally from the UST to remove the diesel-containing capillary fringe soils, HFA estimates that an approximate volume of 7TO cubic yards of diesel-containing soils and an additional 750 cubic yards of "clean" overburden soil will be excavated (see Figure 3 for the proposed limit of excavation]. During excavation, soil samples will be collected from the excavator bucket and screened for total organic vapors with a PID to segregate "clean" overburden from the ,~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD ~ FAFIAN September 24, 1999 - Page 6 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MAN,~,,E3EMENT CONSULTANTS diesel-containing soils. Headspace vapor analysis will be performed by filling a mason jar to 50-percent capacity to produce a headspace allowing volatilization for a period of 15 minutes and protruding the probe of the PID through the cap and into the headspace for analysis. The PID readings will be recorded on a daily log. Upon completion of excavation, soil samples will be collected from the sidewalls of the excavation pit, and composite soil samples will be collected from the stockpiles of diesel-containing soils and "clean" overburden. All sampling equipment will be washed with a non-phosphate cleanser, pre-rinsed with tap water, and finally rinsed with deionized water prior to sampling. The soil samples will collected from the excavator bucket immediately following excavation. The soil samples will be stored in 2-inch-diameter brass tubes, sealed with TeflonTM liners and end caps, labeled, secured with custody seals, placed in an ice chest at a temperature of less than 4°C, and transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis. Sample identification and chain-of-custody procedures will be followed for the samples to ensure sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time of collection to the ultimate destination. The sample labels will identify the job number, sampler, date and time of collection, and a sample number unique to each sample. HFA recommends that an adequate number of soil samples be collected from the sidewalls of the excavation so that each sample represents 200 square feet of surface area. The soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the UST excavation will be collected from within the capillary fringe of groundwater at a depth of approximately 17 fbg (see Figure 3 for the proposed post-excavation soil sample locations). The soil samples will be analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020. The excavated soils will be placed in a stockpile pending off-site disposal (see Figure 3 for the proposed stockpile location). The excavation cavity will be backfilled with the "clean" overburden and fill material generated on-site to construct the treatment cell. The estimated 750 cubic yards will be loaded into 20-cubic-yard covered end dump trucks for transport under non-hazardous materials manifest to a licensed soil recycling facility for disposal. Upon completion of the removal of the most saturated diesel-containing soils and off-site disposal, a report of remedial action will be submitted to the BFDESD, which provides a summary of the mitigation activities and analytical reports, as well as HFA's conclusions and recommendations for further site investigation. HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD ~ FAHAN September 24, 1999 - Page 7 "~~ & ~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Excavation will be initiated within 2 weeks of approval of this work plan by the BFDESD. The soil removal should be completed within 2 to 3 days, and off-site disposal should occur within 1 to 2 days after the completion of excavation activities. Upon receipt of the laboratory analytical results of the post-excavation soil sampling, HFA will submit a Remedial Action Report to the BFDESD within 2 weeks. 3. Upon completion of the soil excavation phase, HFA recommends that an expanded groundwater investigation be conducted consisting of the installation of three monitoring wells (see Figure 4 for the proposed monitoring well locations). The wells should be drilled to a depth of approximately 30 fbg (12 feet below the groundwater surface) and installed with 20 feet of slotted PVC casing. The monitoring wells will be constructed with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing and the appropriate filter pack sand installed from the bottom of the soil boring to 3 feet above the slotted interval. Blank PVC casing packed in neat cement grout will extend from the surface downward to the 3-foot bentonite seal placed above the filter pack. Locking, water-tight well covers will be. set in concrete to protect and secure the wellheads (see Attachment 5 for the monitoring well construction details). Following installation, the monitoring wells will be developed by surging and bailing to remove drilling residues and to produce Iow-turbidity groundwater. Prior to sampling, the proposed monitoring wells will be purged with a pre-cleaned bailer in order to remove stagnant water in the wells. During purging, key parameters including temperature, conductivity, and pH will be measured with a portable electronic meter and recorded. The purging will continue until the monitored parameters stabilize (usually after 3 casing volumes of groundwater has been removed). Following purging, groundwater samples wilt be collected with pre-cleaned TeflonTM bailers and discharged with a non-aerating, bottom-emptying device into sterilized glass containers, capped with TeflonTM septa, labeled, and chilled in an ice chest for transport. The proposed monitoring wells will be surveyed relative to a permanent structure, and from a designated point on the northern side of the top of the well casing, the groundwater level will be measured in the wells to an accuracy of_+0.01 foot. The groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) with an MRL of ,50 pg/I and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 602 with an MRL of 0.5 pg/I (see Attachment 6 for the well purging and groundwater sampling procedures). HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 - Page 8 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., trusts that you will find this Preliminary Site Assessment Report to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA ~,~,~ Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG U Associate Geologist Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure :2 Plot Plan Figure 3 TPH as Diesel/Benzene/MTBE Concentrations in Soil Figure 4 - TPH as Diesel Concentrations in Groundwater Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Table 2 - Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results Attachment 1 - Summary of Previous Work Attachment 2 - Logs of Exploratory Borings Attachment 3 - Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures Affachment4 - Laboratory Report Attachment 5 - Monitoring Well Construction Details Attachment 6 - Well Purging and Groundwater Sampling Procedures cc: Mr. James H. Fuller, Apex Bulk Commodities, inc. ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H, Wines, III BFDESD ~ FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 - Page 9 ~ & ~LATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS II ~', o .......... · :GAHr '~o 'l o .o.,,. ·" · . ,,-~ ... ,.. ~, ITE LOC~TIOI ,'~a~dco · " ~OIL Mile 21 · ~" Oil " Tanks [ine~ LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 0.5 '1 MILE 4 I ~ I I I I I F ~ _ 2111 BRICYN LANE 1,000 2,000 3,000 4.000 §,000 FEET II~l BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I ~ I ~ FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP 0.5 1 KILOMETER m i USGS OILDALE 7.5 MINUTE SERIES QUADRANGLE HOL. GU~T, ~PJ~.~ ~[ ,~J~SOC].~'"~]~S, HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III FAHAN BFDESD ~ &ASSOC~T~, INC. September 24, 1999-Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS EXISTING 2,000-GALLON DIESEL AST B-3 FORMER 1 2,D01E00S'2LAuLLs?N CONCRETE BRICYN LANE 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC, 2111 BRICYN LANE SOIL BORING BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, F, AHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1999: RRI J HOL©UIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAFIAN September 24, 1999 - Page 11 & ~LATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS t / PROPOSED ', / STOCKPILE '\ LOCATION 5 T ND/ND/ND 10-t-- ND/ND/ND ..... ........ 15--I-- 2,900/0.012/N D ! B,B,B,B~'"'O.,, ' 7+ 30,000'0.56'0.074 5-I- ND/ND/ND18-]- 1~ 600/0 39/0 58 18-[-- ND/ND/ND 10-1- Nd/ND/NO / ': : ' / 15--1- Z6b0/0,0061/ND / ..... :',,"etK-1E / / b B.i--I'" eTKdO , . .¢~r~",~ '~" J 18 -L 24/NO/NO ~ / .... T .-~ \ PROPOSED 57 170/ND/ND \EX~tT~,%N lO~ l~,NO,NO j~ BRICYN LANE / 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK CODDODITIES, INC. ~ SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION O PROPOSED 2111 BRICYN LANE POST-EXCAVATION ~ SOIL BORING SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ DEPTH OF SAMPLE (fbg) FIGURE 3 - TPH AS DIESEUBENZENE/MTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL ~ ¢/¢/¢ TPH AS DIESEUBENZENE/MTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (mg/kg) ~O~, ~ · ~80~, I~. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999: RRI ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, BFDESD ~ FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 - Page ~ &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS t OF HYDROCARBON-CONTAINING GROUNDWATER B-3 ' ~ i ~o,ooo ".: 500 MW-1 \ V~"... B-4 ,, BRICYN LANE LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRICYN LANE ,~ TEMPORARY WELL POINT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA -~ PROPOSED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION FIGURE 4 - TPH AS DIESEL CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER # TPH AS DIESEL CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER (pg/I) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999: RRI ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 b Page 13 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT [~ONSULTANTS TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE TPH AS ! ETHYL- TOTAL SAMPLE DATE SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH ID DIESEL IBENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF (fbg) (mg/kg) / (rog/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M)~ 8020 I N/A REPORTING LIMIT 10 0.0051 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.02t N/A B-1 8-4-99 5 B-1-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 B-1-10ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 15 B-1-15 2,600 0.0061 0.031 0.86 1.1 ND A B-2 8-4-99 5 B-2-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 B-2-10 ND ND ND ND NDi ND A 8-4-99 15 I B-2-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND A B-3 8-4-99 5 B-3-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 Bo3-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 15 I B-3-15 2,900 0.012 0.04 0.25 1.51 N~D A 8-4-99 17 I B-3-17 30,000 0.56 13 35 71 0.074 A B-4 8-4-99 5 I B-4-5 I 1701 ND 0.0094 0.022 0.12 ND A 8-4-99 17 i B-4-17I NDI ND ND ND ND ND A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, current report. ~ HOLGUIN, Mr, Howard H, Wines, Ill. BFDESD FAHAN ~ September 24, 1999 - Page 14 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA I 'FLOATING ! SAMPLE DATE DEPTH TO PRODUCT SOURCE SAMPLED GROUNDWATER THICKNESS TPH AS DIESEL REF (feet-MSL) (fbg) i (feet) (pg/I) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 00 N/A CCR TITLE 22 MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL I N/A MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT 50 N/A I 8-4-99 ~181 0.00 1,500 B-1 A B-2 ! 8-4-99 -18f 0.00 800 A B-3 I 8-4'99 ~181 0.00 80,000 A B-4 I 8-4-99 ~18J 0.00J 1,400 A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, current report. ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK EXISTING 2,000-GALLON DIESEL AST FORMER 12 'D~F00,~'¢¢~L~ N .TK-lW CO ~ LCARE~TE ~ 15UILBIN~ ~ FORMER / 0~0~ BRICYN LANE · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 21 1 1 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE I - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIIN', F.&HA.N &: .-'%.SSOCI/%.T]~S, INC. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA DATE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH SAMPLE ID DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD I 8015 (M) I 8020 I N/A REPORTING LIMIT I 101 0.0051 0.0051 0.0051 0.0051 0.021 N/A Western End of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1W-14 9,800 0.1 2.6 3 1,~2~ 0.2 A 1-22-99 18 TK-IW-18 17,000 0.39 6.8 6 --,~,~ 0.58 --~-- Center of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1C-14 ND ND ND 0.0068 0.026 NDI A 1-22-99 18 TK-1C-18 24ND ND ND 0.013 NDI A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated February 25, 1999. ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ASSC~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2.. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS LITHOLOGY (UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) MAJOR DIVISIONS ~ TYPICAL NAMES SYMBOLS WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND z G RAVEL G RAVELS WITH LITTLE SW MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES T MORE THAN OR NO FINES (~p POOR~¥-C,R~ED(~RAVELS OR -- l-- GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LITI'LE OR NO FINES Orr HALF COARSE U) ua FRACTION IS ~ SlL~Y GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES E:I ~ ua LARGER THAN GRAVELS WITH OVER uJ :5 ~ c~eRAVE~. u) ~ No. 4 SIEVE SIZE 12% FINES G~ -- GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES I.L O J O SW WELL.G~D SANDS, GRAVELLY O, < ~ SAND SANDS WITH LITTLE SANDS, LEI'R. EORNOFINES I.U ~z ;~ OR NO RNES POORLY-~P,'~DS~SO~GRAVELLYSANDS. U) ~ MORE THAN ~ LErR~ OR NO FINES rrI:: HALF COARSE ((~ III FRACTION IS SILTY SAND-SILT MIXTURES SANDS. O SMALLER THAN SANDS WITH OVER No. 4 SIEVE SIZE 12% FINES SO cLAVEY s~s. SAND-CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, m ua ML SIL'P¢ OR CI.AYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS ._j ._J OR CLAYEY SLUTS WITH SUGHT PLASTICITY ~ ~ ua I~ORC,~C CU~YS O~ LOW TO ~D~UM PLAs~crrY. rj) ~ .>,,_ SILT AND CLAY CL ~RAVEu_¥~¥s,s~,~¥cLAYS. SiL~cLAYS. U~ANcLAYS u~ ~ OD OL OR'lC ~"~,owAND ,~,~°"~": ~,,~ c~s o~ Z LUi5< ~' SILT AND CLAY CH ~o.~c~Tso~.~nc~..^~c~Ts ZuJI- o ORC.~IC CLATS O~ ~U~ TO ~.~. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL Pt ~¥~o~.~.~¥o~AN,c soius SYMBOLS AND NOTES ~ ASPHALT ~ SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR ANALYSIS ~ ~ ~ SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED ~ ~ETE GROUT ~7~ GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED DURING DRILUNG ~ BENTONITE CHIPS ~ FILTER SAND PACK ~ STABILIZED WATER LEVEL (DATE) (DATE) ~ NATIVE SOIL ~ WELL BOX WITH LOCKING CAP PID = PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR ppmv = PARTS PER MILLION BY VOLUME : BLANK SCHEDULE 40 PVC CASING USCS = UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM SLOTI-ED SCHEDULE 40 PVC CASING gw = GROUNDWATER WELL, vw: VADOSE WELL fbg = FEET BELOW GRADE I DO'FI'OM PLUG OD = OUTSIDE DIAMETER --~..~- ~ ~'~ & KEY TO LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING L~ ASSOCU~T~:S, Z~C. RevtsIon 1/96 SAMPLE CLIENT: APEX Bulk Commodities, Inc. C__OMPLETION DETAIL GROUNDWATER WELL .J PROJECT: Bakersfield Terminal ~ ~. ~ ~ VADOSEWELL <> ~- ¢,5 _~ E o _ SPARGE WELL a_ ~ ¢J') x BORING ~ ~ LOCATION: 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California z ,~ ~ _ LU ~ ~ ~o v CASING: N/A ~ r~ DESCRIPTION AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION -- NAME: %gravel/sand/fines, gradation/plasticity, color, angularity, SLOT SIZE: _ N/A maximum size (gravels), density/consistency, moisture, odor, stain FILTER PACK: N/A _ __ SAND: 0/90/10, fine, poorly graded, clear, angular, SP loose, soft, moist, no odor, no stain ~ 5 2,3,3 0 10 CLAYEY SILT SAND MIXTURE: 0/10/90, medium 2,8,15 0 CL '~'~'~'~' ' '--- 10 plasticity, tan, dense, soft, moist, slight diesel odor, -- no stain ~ ~ 15 SAND: 0/90/10, well graded, tan to brown, 3,6,9 172 SW subangular, loose, soft, moist, diesel odor, no stain ~ ~ 20 saturated, no sample retained ~,~,~,~.,~,~,~ 20 ~ 25 ~ 25 -- 30 ~ 30 ~ 35 ~ 35 DRILLING METHOD: Mobile~ B-53, 8"-OD, hollow-stem auger DATE DRILLED: August 4~ 1999 SAMPLER TYPE: 2"-diameter, California-modified, split spoon LOGGED BY: K. Mitohell, REA TOTAL BORING DEPTH: 20 fbg APPROVED BY: M. Magargee, RG ff4892 DEPTH TO WATER: 18 fbg DRILLED BY: Melton Drilling Gompany ~_ HO~GUIN, B-1 ~ ~~ ~ LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING ~ ASSOC~TES, INC. Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE CLIENT: APEX Bulk Commodities, Inc. C__OMPLETION DETAIL ~ GROUNDWATER WELL uJco -- VADOSE WELL .u PROJECT: Bakersfield Terminal ~_tu ~ co -- co ~ ~'C3 E coq) ~ SPARGE WELL E_ ~ LOCATION: 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California ~ z ~ Z:) ~ BORING U.i ~,.~_' o; ~z r~ DESCRIPTION AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION _J CASING: N/A -- SLOT SIZE: N/A NAME: %gravel/sand/fines, gradation/plasticity, color, angularity, maximum size (gravels), density/consistency, moisture, odor, stain FILTER PACK: N/A __ SANDY SILT: 0/20/80, brown, subangular, dense, soft, ML ,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ moist, no odor, no stain ,,qq~,~,,,, _ · 5 4,5,6 0 · -- 10 0/10/90, slight diesel odor 5,5,5 0 ,,',,',,',,,,~,,,,-- 10 ~ 15 SAND: 0/85/15, well graded, tan, loose, soft, moist, 3,6,9 172 SW no odor, no stain saturated, no sample retained -- 20 20 -- 25 -- 25 -- 30 -- 30 -- 35 -- 35 DRILLING METHOD: MobileTM B-53, 8"-OD, hollow-stem auger DATE DRILLED: August 4, 1999 SAMPLER TYPE: 2"-diameter, California-modified, split spoon LOGGED BY: K. Mitchell, REA TOTAL BORING DEPTH: 20 fbg APPROVED BY: M. Magargee, RG ~4892 DEPTH TO WATER: 18 fbg DRILLED BY: Melton Drilling Company ~ ~OLGUIN, B-2 LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING ~ ~SSOC~TES, INC. Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE CLIENT: APEX Bulk Commodities, Inc. C_OMPLETION DETAIL GROUNDWATER WELL .~ PROJECT: Bakersfield Terminal ~. ~ ~' u~ __ VADOSE WELL ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ 9 E O __ SPARGE WELL ~ LOCATION: 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California_ ~ ~ ~m ~x BORING ~ ~ ~ ~ CASING: N/A ~ ~ DESCRIPTION AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION ~ SLOT SIZE: N/A NAME: %gravel/sand/fines, gradation/plasticity, color, angularity, maximum size (gravels), density/consistency, moisture, odor, stain FILTER PACK: N/A ~ SAND: 0/80/20, well graded, tan, subangular, loose, SW , soft, d~, no odor, no stain ~ 5 3,5,7 0 ~ ~ 10 ~',~'~ 10 ~ SILT: 0/20/80, Iow plasticity, brown, subangular, 4,7,9 0 ML loose, soft, moist, no odor, no stain ~ 15 SAND: 0/90/10, well graded, tan, subangular, loose, 7,7,7 525 SW ~ soft, moist, diesel odor, no stain 11,13,17 948 ~ 7,8,10 1,146 ~ 20 20 ~ 25 ~ 25 ~ 30 ~ 30 ~ 35 ~ 35 DRILLING METHOD: Mobile~ B-53, 8"-OD, hollow-stem auger DATE DRILLED: August 4, 1999 SAMPLER TYPE: 2"-diameter, California-modified, split spoon LOGGED BY: K. Mitchell, REA TOTAL BORING DEPTH: 20 fbg APPROVED BY: M. Magargee, RG ff4892 DEPTH TO WATER: 18 fbg DRILLED BY: Melton Drilling Company ~__ HOLGUIN, B-3 & LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING ~ ASSOC~TES, INC. Page 1 of 1 SAMPLE CLIENT: APEX Bulk Commodities, Inc. C__OMPLETION DETAIL cc GROUNDWATER WELL uJ u~ -- VADOSE WELL -~ PROJECT: Bakersfield Terminal ~. ~u ~- ~ _ ;~ T ~ (/) ~ ~~ (b i SPARGE WELL ,~ ~ LOCATION: 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California ~z ~ o. (/) x BORING CASING: N/A I;~ C3 DESCRIPTION AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION SLOT SIZE: N/A NAME: %gravel/sand/fines, gradation/plasticity, color, angularity, maximum size (gravels), density/consistency, moisture, odor, stain FILTER PACK: N/A _ SILTY SAND: 0/80/20, brown, subangular, loose, soft, SM ....... moist, no odor, no stain mim 5 3,3,5 0 ', ', ', ', ', ', ' ~ 5 · 10 3,6,8 0 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,,, 10 15 FINE SAND: 0/80/20, clean, tan, subangular, loose, 5,5,5 0 SP 15 _~._. soft, moist, no odor, no stain 3,5,8 0 ', '; '; '; '; ';; -- ~ 20 ....... 20 ~ 25 ~ 25 ~ 30 ~ 30 m 35 ~ 35 DRILLING, METHOD: MobileTM B-53, 8"-OD, hollow-stem au,qer DATE DRILLED: August 4~ 1999 SAMPLER TYPE: 2"-diameter, California-modified, split spoon LOGGED BY: K. Mitchell, REA TOTAL BORING DEPTH: 20 lb§ APPROVED BY: M. Magargee, RG #4892 DEPTH TO WATER: 18 fbg DRILLED BY: Melton Drilling Company ~ HOLGUIN, B-4 'Ai-Ub & LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 1 of I HOLGUIN, e ~ FAHAN i~~' &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES SITING Soil borings were positioned as noted in the report. TRUCK-MOUNTED DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Each soil boring was manually drilled for the first 5 feet to establish that the area was clear of subsurface structures. The soil borings were drilled with 8-inch-OD, hollow-stem augers to the depths noted in the report. During the drilling process, soil cuttings were continuously monitored in conformance with the monitoring procedures, and data was recorded on logs of exploratory borings by a state of California registered geologist. Soil samples were collected with a California-modified, split-spoon sampler at intervals consistent with the work plan, unless a change in lithology was noted, in which case an additional sample was collected. The sampler was outfitted with 2.5-inch by 6-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample was withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve were covered with aluminium foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures were consistent with HFA's QA/QC procedures. SOIL BORING MONITORING PROCEDURES Cu~rings from soil borings were continuously classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and logged by a state of California registered geologist. Specific geologic and hydrologic information that was collected included stratigraphy (i.e., layer thickness, unit correlation, aquifer thickness, depth to groundwater, and confining units, if any), relative permeability, observed porosity, plasticity, moisture content, soil type, structure, size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. Specific geologic and hydrologic information that was obtained during soil boring construction includes the following: · Stratigraphic characteristics: thickness, correlation of units, extent (horizontal and vertical) of aquifers and confining units, if any; · Observed porosity; · Volatile organic content; · Particle-size distribution; · Moisture content; · Plasticity; · Strength; · Mineral composition; · Depth to groundwater; · Soil type, structure, size; and · Distribution of soil type. Soil and Sampling Procedures Page 2 The data was recorded on individual logs of exploratory borings, including observations regarding the types and quantities of waste materials encountered and any PID readings. This data was recorded on a standardized log sheet in the Field Log Book. Specific information that was recorded is listed in Table 1, below. TABLE 1. SOIL BORING LOG INFORMATION GENERAL · Project name · Soil boring location; map and · Soil boring name/number elevation · Date started and finished * Rig type (bit size/auger size) · Geologist's name · Petrologic lithologic classification · Driller's name scheme used (Wentworth, USCS) · Sheet number INFORMATION COLUMNS · Depth · Gradation · Sample location/number · Narrative description · PID or FID Reading · Soil Classification NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION · Geologic Observations - Soil/rock type - Particle Size - Organic content - Color and stain - Depositional structures - Odor - Gross petrology - Bedding - Suspected contaminan - Friability Fossils - Discontinuities - Degree of weathering - Moisture content - Water-bearing zones - Particle shape - Formational strike and dip · Drilling Observations - Changes in drilling method - Advance rates or equipment rig - Amounts and types of - Readings from detection chatter any liquids used equipment (if any) - Caving/hole stability - Water levels - Drilling difficulties · Other Remarks - Equipment failures - Deviatior~s from drilling plan - Possible contamination - Weather All field logs were typed and presented verbatim in an appendix of the report. The typed log of exploratory boring is on a form identical to that used in the field log book. Each log of exploratory boring includes a graphic log in which a symbol for each USCS soil group is included for each soil interval. Soil and Sampling Procedures Page 3 DATA REDUCTION The data compiled from the soil borings has been summarized and analyzed. A narrative summary of the soil characteristics was also presented. The logs of exploratory borings were checked for the following information: Correlation of stratigraphlc units among soil borings; Identification of zones of potentially high hydraulic conductivity; identification of the confining formation/layer; · indication of unusual/unpredicted geologic features (fault zones, fracture traces, facies changes, solution channels, buried stream deposits, cross-cutting structures, pinchout zones, etc.); and · Continuity of petrographic features such as sorting, grain-size distribution, cementation, etc. Soil boring locations were plotted on a properly scaled map. The purpose of each soil boring/piezometer/monitoring well/pit/soil sample is indicated on the map, Depending on the results of this analysis, the soil stratigraphy of the site is presented in a scaled stratigraphic column (if soil stratigraphy is laterally homogeneous) or, more likely, in a scaled cross section or a fence diagram (if soil is laterally heterogeneous). Specific features that may impact contaminant migration (e.g., fault zones or impermeable layers) are discussed in narrative form and supplemented with graphical presentations as deemed appropriate. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Prior to each sampling episode, the sampling equipment was decontaminated using a non-phosphate soap and water wash, a tap water rinse, and two deionized water rinses. The drill string was decontaminated with a steam cleaner between each soil boring. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL The cuttings from the soil borings were stored in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation-approved drums. Each drum was labeled with the date on which the waste was generated and the numbers of the soil borings from which the waste was withdrawn. The drums were stored at the site of generation until sample analyses were obtained. Sample analyses and an inventory of drums were then given to the client, who coordinated proper disposal of the soil, according to Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 4. LABORATORY REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIFIONMENTAL I~BOFIATOFllES 143 South Figueroa Street · Ventura, California 93001 · (805) 652-(]219 · FAX: (805) 652-0793 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS August 23, 1999 Page 1 C LI ENT: Analyzed By: T. Karageorge APEX Bulk Commodities Sampled By: K. Mitchell Units: mg/kg Matrix: Soil PROJECTI Bakersfield Terminal Analyses Methods: BTEX: EPA 8020 TPH: 8015-M CONCENTi%ATION OF TOTAL P~TROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION ~ONSTITU~NT TPH- TPH- Ethyl Total Percent Lab Sample Dates Sampled, Gasoline Diesel Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes MTBE Surrogate_ No. No. Received and Tested RL RL RL RL RL RL RL Recovery 991361 8-1-5 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 125% i0 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991362 B-1-10 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 125% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991363 B-l-15 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 2600 .0061 .031 .86 1.1 ND 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991364 B-2-5 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 115% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991365 B-2-10 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 119% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991366 B-2-15 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 122% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991367 B-3-5 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 124% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991368 B-3-10 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 121% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991369 B-3-15 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 2900 .012 .04 .25 1.5 ND 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991370 B-3-17 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 30000 .56 13 35 71 .074 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991371 B-4-5 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 170 ND .0094 .022 .12 ND 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991372 B-4-10 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 12 ND ND ND ND ND 121% 10 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991373 B-4-15 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 122% i0 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 991374 B-4-17 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/10/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 124% I0 .005 .005 .015 .015 .02 9913363, 991369, 991370, 991371 Surrogate not recovered due to matrix interference. RL = Reporting Limit (may vary with Dilution Factor) ND = Not Detected at or above RL Lab Certification: CAELAR #1878; 1/3]/00 Laboratory Manager: HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 143 South Figueroa Street · Ventura, California 93001 · (805) 652-0219 · FAX: (805) 652-0793 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS August 23, 1999 Page 1 CLIENT ~ Analyzed By: T. Karageorge APEX Bulk Co~nodities sampled By: K. Mitchell Units: rog/1 Matrix: Water PROJECT.. Bakersfield Ter~nal Analyses Methods: BTEX: 8015-M CONCENTRATION OF TOTA~' PETRO~.EUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION CONSTITUENT TPH- TPH- Ethyl Total Percent Lab Sample Dates Sampled, Gasoline Diesel Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes MTBE Surrogate_ No. No. Received and Tested RL RL RL RL RL RL RL Recovery 991375 B-1 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/11/99 1.5 .05 991376 B-2 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/11/99 .05 991377 B-3 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/11/99 80 .05 991378 B-4 8/4/99 8/5/99 8/11/99 1.4 .05 ND = Not Detected at or above RL ~_--~ Lab Certificationt CAELAP 11878; 1/31/00Laboratory Manager: Holguin, Fahan & Associates Environmenlol Laboralories 2255 N. Ventura Ave. Venluro, CA 93001 (805)652-2876 METHOD BLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS QC Batch E): 8/I 1/99 Date Exlracled: 9-Aug-99 Inslrumenl ID: HP 6890 GC-3 Date Analyzed : 11-Aug-99 Analyzed By : Ted Karageorge Analysis Method: 8015M CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (tph) AS DIESEL in mg/I (water) TPH- Client Diesel Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL Melhod Blank Water ND 0.5 Extractable fuel hydrocarbons are quanlilated against a diesel standard. Hydocarbons detected by this method range from C10toC24. Analytes reported as ND were nol present above the stated limit of deteclion. RL -- Method Reporling Limit ND = Not Detecled at or above RL /ABCER?IFICATION: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventura Ave. Suite B Ventura, CA 93001 (80,5) 6B2-2876 Sample ID: BLANK SPIKE & BLANK SPIKE DUP. Date Extracted: 9-Aug-99 Lab No: BS&BSD Date Analyzed: 11-Aug-99 Instrument ID: HP 6890 GC-3 Matrix: Water Standard ID#: STL-142 Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8015 Modified Matrix Spike Results C°mpound Sample Matrix Spk. Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(mg/L) Conc.(UG) Conc.(UG) (%) Limits TPH as 0.0 9.4 10 94 45-156 Diesel : Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup. Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(mg/L) Conc.(Ug) Conc.(UG) (%) Limits TPH as 0.0 10.4 10 104 45-156 Diesel Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits TPH as 94 104 99 10 < 19 Diesel Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventura Ave. Unite B Ventura. CA 93001 (805) 652-2876 METHOD BLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Dale Analyzed: 1 O-Aug-99 QC Batch ID: 8/10/99 Analyzed By: IDK Inslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC-I Analysis Melhod; 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH} WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in mg/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Clienl Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RE RE RE RL RE 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method fangefromC4 toC12. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection. RL = Method Reporting Limit ND = Nol Delected Ql or c~bove RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Ind. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventura Ave. Unite B Venturo. CA 93001 (805) 652-2876 METHOD BLANK REPORI' REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Analyzed: I 0-Aug-99 QC Batch iD: 8/10/99 Analyzed By: TDK Inslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC-I Analysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in rog/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Clienl Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL RL I~L RL RL 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND lO 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons delected by this method range from C4 to C12. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection. RL = Method Reporting Limit ND = Not Detected at of above EL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Venlura Ave. Unite B Ventura. CA 73001 (805) 652-2876 METHOD BLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Analyzed: lO-Aug-99 QC Batch iD: 8/10/99 Analyzed By: TDK Instrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC- I Analysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in rog/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Clienl gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Me'lhod Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND I 0 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C4 to C12. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection. RL = Method Reporting Limit ND = Not Delected at or above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAFLAP #1878; I/3)/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 22SS N. Ventu~a Ave. Unite IS Ventura, CA 73001 (805) 652-2876 METHOD ISLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date Analyzed: 1 O-Aug-99 QC Batch ID: 8/10/99 Analyzed By: TDK lnstrumenl ID: HP .5890 GC~I Analysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in rog/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Clienl Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xyienes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND lO 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantilated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C4 to Cl2. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection. RL = Method Reporting Limil ND = Nol Detected at of above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #t878; J/31/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventura Ave. Unite B Ventura. CA 93001 (805) 652-2876 METHOD BLANK REPOR1 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Dale Analyzed: I 0-Aug-99 QC Balch ID: 8/10/99 Analyzed By: TDK Inslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC-I Analysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in rog/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Clienl Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Motfix RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND I0 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range from C4 to C] 2. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection, RL = Method Reporting Limit ND = Not Detected at or above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #1878; 1/31/2000 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255N. VentruaAve. UnitB Ventura, CA 93001 (805)652-2876 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 10-Aug-99 Lab No: 991296 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: ] Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 27,96 20 140 45-158 Benzene 0.00 21.13 20 106 59-i38 l-oluene 0.00 21.43 20 107 59-133 E(hylbenzene 0.00 20.69 20 103 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 43~65 40 109 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 21.69 20 108 59'- 130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 31.53 20 158 45~158 Benzene 0.00 21.57 20 108 59-138 Toluene 0.00 22.04 20 110 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 21.34 20 107 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 44.72 40 112 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 22.17 20 111 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 140 158 149 12.0 <22 Benzene 106 '108 107 2.0 <14 Toluene 107 l l0 109 2.8 <14 Ethylbenzene 103 i 07 105 3.1 <16 m,p-Xylenes 109 112 110 2.4 <16 o-Xylene 108 '111 110 2.2 <15 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventrua Ave. Unit B Ventura, CA 93001 (805)652-2876 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 10-Aug-99 Lab No: 991296 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 27.52 20 138 45-158 Benzene 0.00 20.64 20 103 59-138 Toluene 0.00 21.24 20 106 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 20.80 20 104 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 43.05 40 108 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 21.15 20 106 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 27.21 20 136 45-158 Benzene 0.00 20.44 20 i 02 59-138 l'olue ne 0.00 21.20 20 106 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 20.48 20 102 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 42.36 40 106 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 20.82 20 104 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 138 136 137 1.1 <22 Benzene 103 102 103 1.0 <14 Toluene 106 106 106 0.2 <14 Ethylbenzene 104 102 103 1.6 <16 m,p-Xylenes 108 106 107 1.6 < 16 o-Xyle ne 106 104 105 1.6 < 15 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventrua Ave. Unit B Ventura, CA 93001 /805)652-2876 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 10-Aug-99 Lab No: 991296 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MT B E 0.00 25.78 20 129 45-158 Benzene 0.00 20.29 20 101 59-138 Toluene 0.00 20.58 20 , 103 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 20.03 20 100 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 41.20 40 103 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 20.44 20 102 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. bup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 26.53 20 133 45-158 Benzene 0.00 19.91 20 100 59-138 Toluene 0.00 20.00 20 100 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 19.66 20 98 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 41.33 40 103 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 20.42 20 102 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 129 133 131 2.9 <22 Benzene 101 100 100 1.9 <14 Toluene 103 100 101 2.8 < 14 Ethylbenzene 1 O0 98 99 1.9 < 16 m,p-Xylenes 103 103 103 0.3 < 16 o-Xylene 102 102 102 O. 1 < 15 Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Environmental Laboratories 2255 N. Ventrua Ave. Unit B Ventura, CA 93001 (805)652-2876 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: ]0-Aug-99 Lab No: 991296 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 28.68 20 143 45-158 Benzene 0.00 20.66 20 103 59-138 Toluene 0.00 21.03 20 105 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 20.38 20 102 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 42.68 40 107 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 21.10 20 106 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 27.10 20 136 45-158 Benzene 0.00 20.71 20 104 59-138 Toluene 0.00 20.87 20 104 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 20.28 20 101 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 42.05 40 105 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 20.66 20 103 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 143 136 139 5.6 <22 Benzene 103 104 103 0.2 <14 foluene 105 104 105 0.8 < 14 Ethylbenzene 102 101 102 0.5 <16 m,p-Xylenes 107 105 106 1.5 < 16 o-Xylene 106 103 104 2.1 < 15 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page .~lient Name,,Zl~'~,X" ~{)LK ~rrf~ ~Project Name Client ContacVPhone No. Send repo~ to: Holguin, Fahan & Ass~iates, Inc. SamplersName ~¢~ Date ~~~Anal,sosRequesteO~ 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1 Matdx (soil, Other Info~ation . No. and HFA Date ~me ground water (e.g., ~mpling lo~tion, depth, Type of SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ~e ¢ ~1~ ~1¢ air, water) scl ~dng or MW ~, etc.) Containers ~ J (i.e.. fumaround lime, etc.) see reverse for required det~tion limits ~ ~ SAMPLE RECEIPT ~ PRESERVATIVE ADDED? ~--~--17 [~!( 7 ~.~ ~ ~ ~1 ~les stor~ overnight at HFA are ? ~p ref~emt~ at 4~C. ~ples are tr~ to ~-~-~ 0?2~ ¢O,C /~'~/ [~ Delivered ,o HFA's refrigerator for tempora~ ~ By: (S~n~) Dat¢~ R~ived For Laborato~ By: (S~natur~nl~t~n) Includ~ S~clal H~rds Here: Return sample(s)/cooler to: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. · 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (661) 391-0517 · F~ ¢ (661) 391-0826 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page ,,~ of ~ -" Client Name/01-/°~:~ Project Name Client Contact/Phone No. Send report to: ~-~/'/ ~.K~E'i~,~'~-,Z~ Holguin, Fahan & Ass~iates, Inc. ~tram A C~e ~mple~s Name ~~ Date ~ ~ Analyses Requested~ 2820 Pegasus D~ve, Suite 1 .~/~'~~ ~'~'~ Bakersfield, CA 93308 Sarape %~ ~ AEn: Matrix(soil, Otherlnfo~tion No. and ~~.- ~.- HFA Date ~me gr~ water (e.g., ~mpling I~tion, depth, T~e of ~ ~~' ~ SPECIAL INS~UC~ONS ~e ~ ~1~ ~ air, water) ~il ~dng or MW ~, etc.) Containem~ ~ ~ (i.e., tumar~ ti~, etc.) ~ REQUIRED DE~CTION LIMITs ~un~ see reverse for required det~ion limits SAMPLE RECEIPT ~ PRESERVATIVE ADDED? NI ~les stor~ ~emight at HFA am ' ' mf~emt~ at 4'C. ~es are t~ to Delivered to HFA's refrigerator for tempora~ storage on (Initials) ~ ~: (S~tur~n~a~ ~ ~ ~ (S~a~n~) Dat~ R~el~ For Laborato~ By: {S~tur~O~anl~t~n) I~lu~ S~I H~rds H~e: Return ~mple(s)/c~ler to: Holguin, Fahan & Ass~iates, Inc. · 2820 Pegasus DHve, Suite 1, Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (661) 391-0517 · F~ ~ (661) 391-0826 i & ASS(XZIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 5. MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name APEX Bulk Commodities. Inc. Project Name Bakersfield Terminal Well No. MW-1 throu~]h MW-3 Site Address 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California Aquifer Unconfined Date Completed Proposed Supervised by Mark R. Ma,qar,gee~ CHG~ RG elevation of reference point -395 feet GROUND SURFACE TOP WELL CAP depth of surface seal 2 feet SURFACE SEAL type of surface seal Neat cement annular seal thickness 2 feet ANNULAR SEAL type of annular seal Cement grout 3 feet Iow permeability seal thickness Bentonite chips LOW PERMEABILITY SEAL type of IOW permeability seal diameter of well casing 2 inches ~ WELLCASING type of well casing Schedule 40 PVC depth of top of gravel pack 7 feet GRAVEL PACK type of gravel pack #3 sand depth of groundwater 18 feet from reference point SCREEN depth of top of screen 10 feet screen slot size 0.02 inch screen spacing size 0.02 inch depth of well 30 feet 8 inches diameter of borehole 30 feet depth of borehole ~ BOTTOM WELL CAP [-[O[,GO'"[N, ~'~ & ASSOC].A'T]~S, [N'C. 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite (661) 391-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 6. WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES The regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the subject site is notified 48 hours prior to sampling. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Prior to purging the monitoring wells, water level measurements are collected according to the following procedures: · All wells are checked for floating product with an acrylic bailer or oil/water interface meter, · Water levels within each well are measured to an accuracy of _+0.01 foot using an electric measuring device and are referenced to the surveyed datum (well cover or top of casing). · All wells are monitored within a short time interval on the same day to obtain accurate measurements of the potentiometric surface. · All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. PURGING PROCEDURES The monitoring wells are purged using either a submersible electric pump, bailer, hand pump, or bladder pump. A surge block is used if it becomes apparent during pumping that the well screen has become bridged with sediment or the produced groundwater is overly turbid, During the purging process, groundwater is monitored constantly for temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, odor, and color. These parameters are recorded on a water sample log. Purging continues until all stagnant water within the wells is replaced by fresh formation water, as indicated by removal of a minimum number of well volumes and/or stabilization of the above outlined parameters. Purge water is stored on site in 55-gallon Department of Transportation-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received from the laboratory, or the water is treated and disposed of on site. If permanent pumps are installed in the wells for groundwater remediation, the pumps are operated for at least 24 hours before sampling to ensure adequate purging. D July 8, 1999 Mr. Mark Magargee ~.E c.~E~ 2820 Pegasus Drive Suite 1 RON FRAZE Bakersfield, CA 93308 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Work Plan for Site Assessment at Apex Bulk Commodities Inc., VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield California SUPPRESSION SERVICES Dear Mr. Magargee: 21Ol 'H' Strut Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 This is to notify you that the work plan for the above stated address is satisfactory if your borings reach the bottom of the plume at that depth, PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. and result in at least one non detect sample below the plume. This is Bakersfield, CA 93301 intended to be a full site assessment, not a preliminary site assessment. VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805)326-0576 Hopefully, that will be accomplished with this project. Please give this office 5 working days notice prior to the commencement of work. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3979 Please be advised that any work done that is not performed under FAX(805) 326-0578 direct oversight by this office will not be accepted, unless previously TRAINING DIVISION approved. 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805)399--4697 If yOU have any questions, please call me at (661) 326-3979. FAX (805) 399-5763 Sincerely, Office of Environmental Services REH/dlm cc: Mr. James H. Fuller, Apex Bulk Commodities Inc. Mr. Denny Wyatt, Apex Bulk Commodities Inc. S:\USTFORMS~UST. L3 HOLG IN, FAHAN & AS JCIA IES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS June 30, 1999 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: WORK PLAN FOR PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT AT THE APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL LOCATED AT 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (BFDESD PERMIT #BR-0247) Dear Mr. Wines: The following work plan outlines Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) proposed methodology for conducting a preliminary site assessment at the above-referenced site. HFA proposes to advance 4 soil borings to an approximate maximum depth of 40 fbg and analyze 16 soil samples for TPH as diesel, BTEX, and MTBE during this phase of site assessment. This work is being required by the Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division (BFDESD), as a result of the discovery of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil adjacent to the diesel UST and dispenser, which were removed from the subject site. 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE: The purpose of this work plan is to outline the methodology to be followed for the assessment of the diesel-containing soil at the subject site. The proposed scope of work for this project includes the following major tasks: · develop a work plan and worker health and safety plan for the preliminary site assessment at the Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., Bakersfield Terminal; · advance four soil borings to an approximate maximum depth of 40 fbg; · analyze approximately t6 soil samples for TPH as diesel, BTEX, and MTBE; and · prepare a Preliminary Site Assessment Report documenting the drilling activities, sample results, data analysis, conclusions, and recommendations for any further action that may be necessary. ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS * ENGINEERS Contaminated Site Assessments * Phase I Audits * Site Remediation · Hazardous waste Management 143 South Figueroa Street 16570 Aston Street 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite I 3001 South 351h Street, Suite C-I I Venlura, California 93001 Irvinc, California 92606 Bakersfield, California 93308 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (805) 652-0219 (949) 442-6665 (805) 391-0517 (800) 789-0219 * (602) 426-1000 (805) 652-0793 FAX (949) 724-0446 FAX (805) 391-0826 FAX (602) 426-01 13 FAX Internet: fir$t_last@hfa.com Interl3et: firsl_lasl@hfa.com Internet: first_last@hfa.com Intemet: first_la$t@ph.hfa.com ~I~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD ~ FA~/~N June 30, 1999 - Page 2 & IATES, INC. ENVlt=tONMENTAL MANAGEMENT I~ONE~ULTANTE~ 2. SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is located at 2111 Bricyn Lane in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site is located within the commercial/industrial district, which flanks Rosedale Highway (State Highway 58). The site is at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography is relatively flat with a slight slope to the west-southwest. The site is located within the northeastern quarter of the southwestern quarter of Section 26, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, MDBM. Formerly located at the property were one 12,000-gallon gasoline UST and a single dispenser (see Figure 2- Plot Plan). Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site. The property owner contact is Mr. James H. Fuller, Compliance Manager, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., 12531 Violet Road, Adelanto, California, 92301, (760) 246-6077. The consultant contact is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. 3. SITE MAPS: Site maps are included as Figures 1 and 2. 4. TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND HYDROGEOLOGY: The site is located at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSU and the topography slopes slightly to the west-southwest (see Figure 1). The subject site is located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake-bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 50,000 fbg (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). At the subject site, surface deposits consist of Quaternary (recent) unconsolidated alluvium overlying Quaternary (Pleistocene) nonmarine sediments. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments that form a homocline dipping gently to the west-southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of indurated and dissected fan deposits (CDMG, 1965). Surface soils are classified by the Soils Conservation Services as Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex and are characterized as 35 percent Kimberlina fine, sandy loam with moderate permeability; 30 percent Urban land with impervious surfaces and altered fills; and 20 percent Cajon loamy sand with high permeability. r HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAHAN June 30, 1999 - Page 3 & ~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Great Valley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Jooquin Valley. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east and are transported by five major rivers, the closest to the site being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. The depth to the regional, unconfined aquifer is approximately 60 fbg, and the groundwater gradient is to the west, away from the Kern River (Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), 1998, 1997 Report on Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4, February 1, 1998). Perched groundwater at depths as shallow as 20 feet is known to be present flanking the current course of the Kern River, but is not known to extend to the site (KCWA, 1998, 1995 Water Supply Report, January 1998). 5. TANK HISTORY: Formerly located at the site were one ]2,000-gallon diesel UST and a single dispenser (see Figure 2). Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site. 6. IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF MATERIAL RELEASED: Diesel hydrocarbons: the quantity released is unknown. 7. PREVIOUS WORK: On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, under Permit #BR-0247 with the BFDESD. Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively (see Figure 2 for the soil sample locations). Significantadsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST (see Table 1 -Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results). The BFDESD, in its letter dated March 30, 1999, is currently requiring performance of a preliminary assessment of the vertical and lateral limits of the diesel-containing soil and an assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination resulting from the release. 8. STRATEGY AND PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING THE VERTICAL AND LATERAL EXTENTS OF DIESEL-CONTAINING SOILS: The intent of this work plan is to present the methodologies to be used to assess the vertical and lateral extents of diesel-containing soils and the possibility of groundwater contamination resulting from the release of hydrocarbons from the underground storage system at the site. HFA proposes to accomplish this by drilling fl soil borings (B-1 through B-4) to o depth of approximately 40 fbg and analyzing 16 soil samples for TPH as diesel, BTEX, and MTBE (see Figure 2 for the proposed soil boring locations). ~ HOLGUIN, '~' Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill FAHAN June 30, 1999 - Page 4 & ASSOCIATE.S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 9. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: Prior to any intrusive methods being conducted at the site, Underground Service Alert of Northern California will be utilized to map out the underground structures. Based on the clearances obtained, HFA will site the soil borings in safe locations. Soil Investigation Drilling A total of four soil borings will be advanced during this preliminary site characterization. The soil borings will be drilled to an approximate maximum depth of 40 fbg. In order to assess the vertical limit of gasoline-containing soil, soil boring B-1 shall be drilled adjacent to the potential source area at the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST, soil boring B-2 shall be drilled through the potential source area at the diesel dispenser, and soil borings B-3 and B-4 will be drilled as lateral-assessing soil borings (see Figure 2 for the proposed soil boring locations). Flexibility will be maintained in the location and depth of the soil borings based on field observations. The lateral-assessing soil boring will be advanced to the depth at which diesel hydrocarbon concentrations are encountered in the vertical-assessing soil borings. Soil samples will be collected at 5-foot intervals. Based on field screening, the soil borings will be advanced to the depth of 10 consecutive feet of unimpacted soil, impenetrable soil or bedrock, or the capillary fringe of groundwater, where a soil sample will be collected (see Attachment 1 for the soil boring and sampling procedures). Laboratory analysis will be conducted on soil samples collected at 5-foot intervals in the vertical-assessing soil borings (excluding the soil samples collected at the same depths collected during previous soil assessment activities) and no more than 10-foot intervals in the lateral-assessing soil borings, with two consecutive soil samples collected from the base of the lateral-assessing soil boring if diesel-containing soils are penetrated. During the drilling process, soil cuttings, as well as each soil sample, will be field-screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene, and observations will be made for the visual identification of any soil staining or discoloration. Soils will be classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System by an experienced environmental geologist under the direct supervision of a state of California registered geologist, and all data will be recorded on logs of exploratory borings. Soil samples will be wrapped in TeflonTM, followed by close-fitting plastic caps, and held at a temperature of 4°C while in the field and in transit to the laboratory. Soil sampling equipment will be decontaminated between sampling attempts using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap-water rinse; and a distilled, deionized water rinse. HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, Ill BFDESD FAHAN June 30, 1999 - Page 5 [ & A. . _%OCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Chemical Analysis of Soil Samoles Soil samples will be sent fo HFA Environmental Laboratories, a California state-certified laboratory, for analysis. Based on field observations, approximately 16 soil sample will be selected for laboratory analysis. The selected soil samples will be analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) with an MRL of 10 mg/kg and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020 with an MRL of 0.005 mg/kg. Reood Preparation Upon completion of the drilling activities and receipt of the laboratory report, HFA will provide a Preliminary Site Assessment Report that details the field activities; sample collection, analytical results, data analysis, conclusions, and HFA's recommendation for further assessment or remedial activities, if required. Certified laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documents will be included. 10. EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES: Sampling equipment will be decontaminated using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and a distilled, deionized water rinse. The drilling auger will be decontaminated in a similar manner between sampling locations. 11. WASTE DISPOSAL PROCEDURES: All drill cuttings and sample spoils that exhibit discoloration, odors, or elevated field-screening readings will be segregated and containerized in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation-approved drums pending laboratory analytical results. Uncontaminated soil cuttings will be spread as grading fill at the site. Rinsate will be disposed as sewage with the permission of the appropriate agency. 12. EMERGENCY OR INTERIM CLEANUP: Not applicable. 13. WORK SCHEDULE: Work will begin within 2 weeks subsequent to the acceptance of this work plan by the BFDESD, The BFDESD will be notified at least 48 hours before any on-site work commences. A Preliminary Site Assessment Report will be submitted to the BFDESD approximately 4 weeks after commencement of the work. 14. SITE SAFETY PLAN: A worker health and safety plan developed by HFA's industrial hygienist for UST site investigations outlines the procedures for conducting all on-site work. Site-specific information is provided on the cover page of the worker health and safety plan (see Attachment 2 for the worker health and safety plan). ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAHAN ~ June 30, 1999 - Page 6 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS All work will be conducted in accordance with all regulatory requirements as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board's LUFT Field Manual and the BFDESD guidance documents. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., trusts that you will find this work plan to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, Geolo,~l ,~R~ Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RC~ Associate Senior Hydrogeologist Hoiguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Attachment 1 - Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures Attachment.2 - Worker Health and Safety Plan cc: Mr. James H. Fuller, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Mr. Howard H, Wines, III I . ~~~~ HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAI-L~r~ June 30, 1999 - Page 7 & A.SSCX~TB, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ..... --. ~--~ ..... ~~-~-~<~::~-~---~'---=~-~-~-o-~. ~; fi - i~ ....... ~ ........... ,~%."' ~' ~/x~..'. '/i .?,z · ' ;>/~.~.~ /. - ~412 ."" '.~ ~' · ..~o. ~ ',, '.., .~r ~ . ~ I : o b/~ zz.~ o ."" " · ~ ~ ,~.~. ~ U .............. ' ....... ~' ~'/" ' ~'~,~ z/~ ~ ~7~ / / /,-" · q~ ~[I ~E~Y / '.1~--~:~''~ ~ " /* ~ o7~TM - I .:': " , )'" o - · ~,1 '~ , '- ~'~L> ~ .-~ '~ ~ -' .......... :~""~ ..................... ~ ,~ I, ,' ~ t~ ' ~ ~ ~ ..5 .... :~t' o o . ,-': ~ ~ ~-~_.-- p~ o-~, .~" · I -h.. ,I . ~, ~,~ ~ ~ . ;// ~7/ // ~ ~,'. .... ~..v/.,'.- ~ o z ~ ,~-~r' '~~~~ ~h' ~// ~//~/~''., -- S?//-' o~l S.m~ c L 'oo. o I1~: ~,,~' m o ~' I' '"r' · ' "' ~=a ........ '// 2~ jk~ .... F'" ~ ~:: ..... ": ~ ~j · ~'_~ .... ' '~ O / ,,.~ .~,~ "h.:.' ~=~,,~,~ ~ ~ o :.~.,-' o:. ;: .- . / ' ~ ..... ,,.' , ~ ~ ~ ot ~ '~ ~ I, · : ~ z, F ~ o Jz K Y~ ... " ' ' ~' ~ ~ __ / . ' .~ ' " I~ " · ~1~ " ~ I " ~-~ ~ ',' %~- ~~.,44..~ ,o~t o o . ~/ ~J ~, ~ . o /.' ~c " ,~~l~ -~-:~.,.'4P:' · ~,,~ ~, ~, .~.~e.' ,,,~ ,~~~ , ~' ._.-- ,~ '~ .... ~'. ~_ . ¢ ........ ~ ~'.~ (. . , ~ ,-r~Jq'~ zJ~ ".'. ' e ~~~;:~ .l I1~ ' , -- ....... .,,.- ............... . -.~,~ ~ _:~,. ...-. ~ ...~./._._~ ... .... .~... ~,.~ ..... --'~-~-~-~'.,~ ..... ~,.~ ~.,,~S~~~;~t~.. ,,, usGso..o,~.~ ~s ~U~E s~n.~sau~u.~o.~ [ I HOLGUIN F~ ~ ~SOC~TES. INC. ~ HOLGUIN, Mr, Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD ~ FAHAN June 30, 1999 - Page 8 ~ &/kS.S(~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS --~ EXISTING 12,000-GALLON DIESEL AST B-3 ~ FORMER ~ \ 12,000-GALLON ~ \ DIESEL UST \ \ B-1 ..... ·TK-1C ~ ~ ~~, ~.T. K-1W k k ~ I"~._0 )~--CONCRETE ' BRICYN LANE / 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALiFORNiA ~ PROPOSED SOIL BORING LOCATION FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: JUNE 30, 1999: RRI ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, BFDESD ~ FAHAN June 30, 1999 Page 9 ~ - ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES SITING Soil borings will be positioned as noted in the work plan. TRUCK-MOUNTED DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Each soil boring is manually drilled for the first 5 feet to establish that the area is clear of subsurface structures. The wells are completed with 8-inch-OD hollow-stem augers to the depths noted in the work plan. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are continuously monitored in conformance with the monitoring procedures, and data is recorded on logs of exploratory boring by a State of California registered geologist. Soil samples are collected with a California modified split-spoon sampler at intervals consistent with the work plan, unless a change in lithology is noted, in which case an additional sample is collected. The sampler is outfitted with 2.5-inch by 6-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps, Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with HFA's QA/QC procedures. BOREHOLE MONITORING PROCEDURES Cuttings from soil borings are continuously classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and logged by a State of California registered geologist. Specific geologic and hydrologic information that are collected included stratigraphy (i.e., layer thickness, unit correlation, aquifer thickness, depth to groundwater, and confining units, if any), relative permeability, observed porosity, plasticity, moisture content, soil type, structure, size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. Specific geologic and hydrologic information that is obtained during soil boring construction includes the following: · Stratigraphic characteristics: thickness, correlation of units, extent (horizontal and vertical) of aquifers and confining units, if any; · Observed porosity; · Volatile organic content; · Particle-size distribution; · Moisture content; · Plasticity; · Strength; · Mineral composition; · Depth to groundwater; · Soil type, structure, size; and · Distribution of soil type. Soil and Sampling Procedures Page 2 The data is recorded on individual logs of exploratory boring, including observations regarding the types and quantities of waste materials encountered and any PID readings. This data is recorded on a standardized log sheet in the Field Log Book. Specific information that is recorded is listed in Table 1, below. TABLE 1. SOIL BORING LOG INFORMATION GENERAL · Project name · Borehole location; map and · Borehole name/number elevation · Date started and finished · Rig type (bit size/auger size) · Geologist's name · Petrologic lithologic classification · Driller's name scheme used (Wentworth, USCS) · Sheet number INFORMATION COLUMNS · Depth · Gradation · Sample location/number · Narrative description · Photoionzation or Flame · Soil Classification Ionization Detector Reading NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION · Geologic Observations - Soil/rock type - Particle Size - Organic content - Color and stain - Depositional structures - Odor - Gross petrology - Bedding - Suspected contaminant - Friability - Fossils - Discontinuities - Degree of weathering - Moisture content - Water-bearing zones - Particle shape - Formational strike and dip · Drilling Observations - Changes in drilling method - Advance rates or equipment rig - Amounts and types of - Readings from detection chatter any liquids used equipment (if any) - Caving/hole stability - Water levels - Drilling difficulties Other Remarks - Equipment failures - Deviations from drilling plan - Possible contamination - Weather All field logs are typed and presented verbatim in an appendix of the report. The typed log of exploratory boring is on a form identical to that used in the field log book. Each log of exploratory boring includes a graphic log in which a symbol for each USCS soil group is included for each soil interval. Soil and Sampling Procedures Page 3 DATA REDUCTION The data compiled from the soil borings is summarized and analyzed. A narrative summary of the soil characteristics is also presented. The logs of exploratory borings are checked for the following information: · Correlation of stratigraphic units among boreholes; · Identification of zones of potentially high hydraulic conductivity; · Identification of the confining formation/layer; · Indication of unusual/unpredicted geologic features (fault zones, fracture traces, facies changes, solution channels, buried stream deposits, cross-cutting structures, pinchout zones, etc.); and · Continuity of petrographic features such as sorting, grain-size distribution, cementation, etc. Borehole locations are plotted on a properly scaled map. The purpose of each soil boring/piezometer/monitoring well/pit/soil sample is indicated on the map. Depending on the results of this analysis, the soil stratigraphy of the site is presented in a scaled stratigraphic column (if soil stratigraphy is laterally homogeneous) or, more likely, in a scaled cross section or a fence diagram (if soil is laterally heterogeneous). Specific features that may impact contaminant migration, e.g., fault zones or impermeable layers, are discussed in narrative form and supplemented with graphical presentations as deemed appropriate. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Prior to each sampling episode, the sampling equipment is decontaminated using a non-phosphate soap and water wash, a tap water rinse, and two deionized water rinses. 1'he drill string is decontaminated with a steam cleaner between each well/boring. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL The cuttings from the soil borings are stored in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation-approved drums. Each drum is labeled with the date that the waste was generated and the numbers of the soil borings from which the waste is withdrawn. The drums are stored at the site of generation until sample analyses are obtained. Sample analyses and an inventory of drums are then given to the client, who coordinated proper disposal of the soil, according to Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. 1~~------~------ HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INVESTIGATIONS SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION Site Address: 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California Name of Business Occupying Site: Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Owner Contact: Mr. Page Dalby Owner Tel. #: (661) 871-8172 BFDESD Contact: Mr. Howard H, Wines, III Tel. #: (661) 326-3979 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND GOALS OF THIS INVESTIGATION: Drill four soil borings to a depth of 40 fbg to assess diesel hydrocarbons in soil. KNOWN HAZARDS AT THE SITE INCLUDE: Diesel hydrocarbons KEY PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES: NAM E RE SPON SI BI LITI ES Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA SITE SAFETY OFFICER - Primarily responsible for site safety, response operations, and protection of the public. Responsible for work site inspections to identify particular hazards and define (661) 391-0517 site security. Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG PROJECT MANAGER Primarily responsible for site characterization. The project manager delineates authority, coordinates activities and functions, and directs activities (661) 391-0517 related to mitigative efforts of cleanup contractors. Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA SITE INVESTIGATIVE PERSONNEL- Responsible for actual field work including sampling, monitoring, equipment use, and other (661) 391K]517 related tasks as defined by the project manager. ANTICIPATED WEATHER CONDITIONS FOR THIS AREA DURING THE PROJECT'S DURATION WILL BE: Temp, range: 80-100°F Humidity: 20-40% Ambient temp.: 90°F Potential for heat stress: High: X Medium: Low: ANTICIPATED PROTECTION LEVEL DURING THIS PROJECT* Level "D" *Will be upgraded or downgraded to fit situations as they arise. EMERGENCY INFORMATION: All emergency calls: 911 Closest hospital with emergency room: Mercy Southwest Hospital 400 Old River Road, Bakersfield, California, (661) 663-6000 Map Showing Route from Site to Hospital Attached? Yes: X No: WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INVESTIGATIONS This document outlines Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) worker health and safety plan for its employees to be used at Kern County UST site investigations. Site-specific information is provided on the cover page to this document. This worker health and safety plan was developed by HFA's industrial hygienist through consultation of the following documents: · Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1910 - "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, Final Ruling," March 1989; · NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities," October 1985; and · HFA's Corporate Health and Safety Program. This worker health and safety plan is divided into the following categories: 1. Job Hazard Assessment; 2. Exposure Monitoring Plan; 3. Personal Protective Equipment; 4. Work Zones and Security Measures; 5. Decontamination and Disposal; 6. Employee Training; and 7. Emergency Procedures. 1. JOB HAZARD ASSESSMENT Immediate tasks at any leaking UST site include an evaluation of any present or potential threat to public safety. Questions need to be answered regarding the dangers of significant vapor exposures and potential explosion hazards. Potential Chemical Hazards The chemical components of hydrocarbons that are the most dangerous to site workers are the volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and potentially, organic lead (see Appendix 1 for Material Safety Data Sheet). Additionally, solvents such as 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 1,2-dichloroethane may also be used as cleaning solutions at service stations. The primary health risks associated with each of these chemicals are described below. frker Health and Safety Plan Page 2 Benzene - Suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 10 ppm or 30 mg/m3 has been assigned to benzene. Benzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 1.4 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to benzene can cause irritation to the eyes, nose, and respiratory system; headache, and nausea. Toluene - A TLV OF 100 ppm or 375 mg/m3 has been assigned to toluene. Toluene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2.1 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to toluene can cause fatigue, weakness, confusion, and euphoria. Eth¥1benzene - A TLV of 100 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to ethylbenzene. Ethylbenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to ethylbenzene can cause irritation to the eyes and mucous membranes. X¥1ene - A TLV or 100 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to xylene. No Iow odor threshold limit has been established for xylene. Low-level inhalation exposure to xytene can cause dizziness, excitement, and drowsiness. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene A TLV of 50 ppm or 306 mg/m3 has been assigned to 1,2-dichlorobenzene. 1,2-dichlorobenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 4.0 ppm. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, and drowsiness. It may cause skin irritation. 1,2-Dichloroethane- A TLV of 200 ppm. No data is availoble concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, drowsiness, and skin irritation. Tetraethyl Lead - A TLV of 0.1 mg/m3 has been assigned to tetraethyl lead. Tetraethyl lead is a colorless or red-dyed liquid at atmospheric conditions. No data is available concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause insomnia, delirium, coma, and skin irritation. Potential Physical Hazards Trenching - Dangerously high fuel vapor levels will be monitored using an LEL meter. The presence of underground utilities are also of concern, and Underground Service Alert will be notified in advance of any trenching work for identification of all underground utilities in the immediate area. Drilling - Dc~ngerously high fuel vapor levels will be monitored using an LEL meter. The presence of underground utilities are also of concern, and Underground Service Alert will be notified in advE~nce of any drilling work for identification of all underground utilities in the immediate area. Health and Safety Plan Page 3 Sampling - Use of personal protective equipment will minimize the potential for exposure of personnel conducting site investigation activities. Heat stress will be monitored by each individual and controlled through regular work breaks as outlined in the American Conference of Governmental industrial Hygienists' TLV's for heat stress conditions. 2. EXPOSURE MONITORING PLAN Potential exposure hazards found at UST sites primarily include toxic airborne vapors from leaking USTs. The most dangerous airborne vapor likely to be encountered during a UST investigation is benzene. Hydrocarbon vapor concentration levels will be monitored in the breathing zone with a PID calibrated to benzene. When the action level of 150 ppm (one half the TLV of gasoline) is detected in the breathing zone, respiratory protection will be required utilizing full-face or half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Monitoring for combustible gases will also be performed using an LEL meter when vapor concentrations above 2,000 ppm are detected with the PID. The action level is 35 percent of the LEL for gasoline vapors or 4,500 ppm. If this level is attained or exceeded, the work party will be IMMEDIATELY withdrawn. 3. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT The level of protection during the site investigation will usually be level "D." Level "D" protective equipment includes coveralls, safety boots, safety glasses, gloves, and hard hats if drilling or trenching operations are in progress. Upgrading the protection level would be based on airborne benzene concentration levels equal to or exceeding the action level. An upgrade to level "C" protection would be required if the action level is equaled or exceeded. Additional equipment required for level "C" would be a full-face or half-face air purifying canister-equipped respirator and TyvekTM suits with taped arm and leg seals. If the action level is met or exceeded (35 percent) for the LEL, work will cease until the vapor levd is measured to be bdow 20 percent of the LEL. Health and Safety Plan Page 4 A fire extinguisher will be maintained on site. Decisions for workers' safety are based on a continual evaluation of existing or changing conditions. 4. WORK ZONES AND SECURITY MEASURES To facilitate a minimum exposure to dangerous toxic vapors and/or physical hazards, only authorized persons will be allowed on the job site. Work zones will be defined by HFA staff who will also be responsible for maintaining security within these zones. Only the minimum number of personnel necessary for the UST investigation will be present in the work zone. 5. DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL HFA's standard operating procedures establish practices that minimize contact with potentially contaminated materials. Decontamination procedures are utilized if there is suspected or known contamination of equipment, supplies, instruments or any personnel surfaces. Soap and water will be utilized to remove contaminants from personnel surfaces as well as equipment and instruments. Contaminated wash water will be disposed of in accordance with procedures outlined in the Kern County LUFT guidance document. 6. EMPLOYEE TRAINING All HFA employees working on the site will have had, at a minimum, the required 40-hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Site Activities (29 CFR 1910, 120), which includes training in the use of personal protective equipment. Individualized respirator fit testing is required of all HFA employees working at the site. 7. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES HFA employees are trained in emergency first aid, and emergency first aid provisions will be brought to the site. In the event of overt personnel exposure (i,e., skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion), the victim will be transported to and treated at the closest hospital (see Hospital Map). - AS OC HOLGTjIN, FAHAN & INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS November 8, 1999 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN ADDENDUM FOR APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (BFDESD PERMIT #BR-0247) Dear Mr. Wines: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) Is pleased to present the following Remedial Action Plan Addendum for the above-referenced site. Based upon the results of the site Investigations conducted at the site, the RAP proposed the excavation of the most-saturated diesel-contalnlng soils and the off-site disposal of the excavated soils at a licensed recycling facility. This addendum to the RAP proposes the bioremedlation of the soil prior to reuse of the soil as grading material at the site. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 2111 Brlcyn Lane in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site is located within ~the commercial/industrial district, which flanks Rosedale Highway (State Highway 58). The site is at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography is relatively fiat with a slight slope to the west-southwest. The site is located within the southeastern quarter of the northwestern quarter of Section 26, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, MDBM. Formerly located at the property were one 12,000-gallon gasoline UST and a single dispenser. Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan). The property owner contact is Mr. James H. Fuller, Compliance Manager, Apex Bulk Commodities, inc., 12531 Violet Road, Adelanto, California, 92301, (760) 246-6077. The consultant contact is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS * ENGINEERS Contaminated Site Assessments · Phase I Audits * Site Remediation * Hazardous Waste Management 143 South Figueroa Street 16570 Aston Street 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite I 3001 South 35th Street, Suite C-I 1 Ventura, California 93001 Irving, California 92606 Bakersfield, California 93308 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (805) 652~0219 (949) 442-6665 (805) 391-0517 (800) 789-0219 * (602) 426-1000 (805t 652-0793 FAX (949) 724-0446 FAX (805) 391-0826 FAX (602) 426-0113 FAX Internet: first_last@hfa.corn lnternet: firslJast@hfa.com Internet: firsl_last@hfa.com lnternet: first_last@ph.hfa.com :' Mr. Howard H. Wines, Iit HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 2 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS SITE BACKGROUND SITE GEOLOGY The site is located at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography slopes slightly to the west-southwest (see Figure 1). The subject site is located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake-bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 50,060 fbg (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). At the subject site, surface deposits consist of Quaternary (recent) unconsolidated alluvium overlying Quaternary (Pleistocene) nonmarine sediments. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments that form a homocline dipping gently to the west-southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of indurated and dissected fan deposits (CDMG, 1965). Surface soils are classified by the Soils Conservation Services as Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex and are characterized as 35 percent Kimberlina fine, sandy loam with moderate permeability; 30 percent Urban land with impervious surfaces and altered fills; and 20 percent Cajon loamy sand with high permeability. SITE HYDROGEOLOGY The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The GreatValley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east and are transported by five major rivers, the closest to the site being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. The depth to the regional, unconfined aquifer is approximately 20 fbg, and the groundwater gradient is to the west-northwest, away from the Kern River (Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), 1998, 1997 Report on Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4, February 1, 1998). Perched groundwater is known to be present flanking the current course of the Kern River, but is not known to extend to the site (KCWA, 1998, 1995 Water Supply Report, January 1998). ~ HOL©UIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD ~ FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 3 & IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS PREVIOUS WORK On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, under Permit #BR-0247 with the Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division (BFDESD). Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST (see Attachment 1 for a summary of previous work). Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, the BFDESD, in its letter dated March 30, 1999, requested a preliminary site assessment to determine the vertical and lateral limits of diesel-containing soils and assess the potential for the release to impact groundwater resources. HFA prepared a work plan dated June 30, 1999, to perform the requested work, which was subsequently approved for implementation by the BFDESD, in its letter dated July 8, 1999. HFA performed the drilling and sampling activities on August 4, 1999. Four soil borings were drilled during this phase of soil investigation. Soil boring B-1 was drilled to a depth of 20 fbg adjacent to the former location of the western (turbine) end of the 12,000-gallon diesel UST to assess the vertical limit of diesel-containing soil in the area of this potential release. Soil boring B-2 was drilled to a depth of 20 fbg adjacent to the former location of the dispenser to assess the vertical limit of diesel-containing soil in the area of this potential release. Soil borings B-3 and B-4 were drilled to a depth of 20 fbg at locations to assess the lateral distribution of diesel hydrocarbons (see Figure 2 for the soil boring locations). Soils encountered during drilling included silty sands to coarse-grained sands to the total depth of each soil boring. Since groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 18 fbg in each soil boring, the soil borings were installed as temporary well points, and HydropunchTM-type groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring, Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-1 to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, and in the soil samples collected from downgradient soil boring B-3 in the capillary fringe soils immediately above groundwater. Minor adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the near-surface soil samples collected from upgradient soil boring B-4. Adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-2 drilled through the location of the former dispenser. Trace to nondetectable adsorbed-phase BTEX and MTBE concentrations were observed in the 14 soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis (see Figure 3- TPH as Diesel/Benzene/MTBE Concentrations in Soil and Table 1 - Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results). ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III BFDESD FAI-L N November 8, 1999 - Page 4 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentrations in excess of the CCR Title 22 drinking water MCL were detected in the groundwater samples collected from the four temporary well points reaching a maximum dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentration of 80,000 pg/I in the groundwater sample collected from downgradient well point B-3 (see Figure 4- TPH as Diesel Concentrations in Groundwater and Table 2 - Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results). HFA's RAP, dated September 24, 1999, recommended the excavation of the most saturated diesel-containing soils to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg centered on the western (turbine) end of the former UST and laterally from the UST to remove the diesel-containing capillary fringe soils. HFA estimated that an approximate volume of 750cubic yards of diesel-containing soils and an additional 750 cubic yards of "clean" overburden soil will be excavated (see Figure 3 for the proposed limit of excavation). The RAP proposed that excavated soils be placed in a stockpile pending off-site disposal (see Figure 3 for the proposed stockpile location). The excavation cavity will be backfilled with the "clean" overburden and fill material generated on-site to construct the treatment cell. The RAP proposed that the estimated 750 cubic yards will be loaded into 20-cubic-yard covered end dump trucks for transPort under non-hazardous materials manifest to a licensed soil recycling facility for disposal. HFA has prepared this addendum to modify the RAP to permit the diesel-containing soils to be placed into a bioremediation cell at the site, and upon completion of the treatment, reused on site as grading material. SOIL TREATMENT WORK PLAN APEX Bulk Commodities is seeking permission from the BFDESD to bioremediate the diesel-containing soil on the approximately 3-acre vacant lot, which was recently acquired by APEX Bulk Commodities and is located immediately west and adjoining the facility, prior to reuse of the treated soil as grading material on this vacant lot (see Figure 2 for the proposed soil treatment location). The estimated 750 cubic yards of diesel-containing soil will be stockpiled pending treatment. There is no residence on the subject site or within 1,000 feet of the location of the proposed treatment cell. With the approval of the BFDESD, the soil will be placed to a thickness of less than 1 foot within a bermed treatment cell and treated solely through aeration and mechanical-cultivation-enhanced biodegradation (see Figure 5- Proposed Treatment Cell Diagram). ~ Mr. Howard H, Wines, III HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 5 & ASSOCET , INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS HFA proposes that lining the treatment cell is not warranted given that the initial TPH as diesel concentrations of the soils in the treatment cell will likely range from 1,000 fo 2,000 mg/kg (0.1 fo 0.2 percent by weight), which results in a Iow probability that the diesel hydrocarbons currently Qdsorbed onto the soil would be mobilized and migrQte through the underlying soil toward groundwater. In addition, during the construction of the treatment cell and berm, the base of the treatment cell will be compacted, which will further inhibit potential migration. Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons may be emitted during the remediation of the diesel-containing soil at the site. However, a review of the available analytical data indicates that the limited aeration of 750 cubic yards of soil qualifies for an exemption to Authority to Construct air emissions permitting as described in the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District - Southern Region Rule 4651. The soil was impacted with a release of diesel fuel. The boiling point of this fuel is approximately 400°F. Since the boiling point is greater than 302°F, the site qualifies for an exemption under Rule 4651, Section 4.1.4. Therefore, the entire 750 cubic yards of impacted soil may be uncovered within the treatment pad during one continuous time period. Rule 4651, Section 5.2.1.1, states that if the limited aeration is greater than 1J300 feet from a school, then a risk assessment using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Air Toxics Assessment Manual to verify less than a one in a million excess cancer risk is not required. Benzene was detected in only 5 of the 20 soil samples collected from beneath the diesel UST and dispensers during the tank removal and subsequent site investigation activities, reaching a maximum benzene concentration of 0.56 rog/kg. A mass balance calculation for the average concentration of benzene in the approximately 750 cubic yards of soil that will be bioremediated assumes an average benzene concentration of 0.05 mg/kg. Assuming that the entire mass of benzene will volatilize in the first day of uncovered treatment, less than 0.00021 pound of benzene will be emitted in that day. The emission calculations have been provided below: Benzene Emission Calculations Evaporation Rote 750 cubic yards/day = 20,250 cubic feet/day Benzene Emission (20,250 cubic feet/day)/(379.4 cubic feet/lbs-mole) = 53.4 lbs-mole/day (53.4 lbs-mole/day)*(0.05 ppm) = 0.00000267 lbs-mole/day Molecular weight of benzene = 78 lbs/lbs-mole (0.00000267 lbs-mole/day)*(78 lbs/lbs-mole) = 0.00021 lbs/day ~ Mr. Howard H. Wines, III HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAH N November 8, 1999 - Page 6 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS The CAPCOA "Screening Level Risk Assessment" indicates that the maxtmum potential emission of 0.03321 pound of benzene over the duration of the project presents an excess cancer risk from the proposed project several orders of magnitude less than one in a million. Treatment will consist of bi-weekly (every other week), mechanical cultivation. Because aeration has been shown to be successful in the treatment of diesel-containing soils, HFA proposes that treatment will consist solely of aeration and mechanical-cultivation-enhanced biodegradation. No supplemental nutrients or moisture conditioning are anticipated. If after 4 months of aeration, treatment is not progressing toward timely attainment of the BFDESD action levels, then HFA will provide the BFDESD with a progress report that will detail methods for acceleration of the treatment process through the addition of supplemental nutrients in the form of time-released nitrogen/phosphorus fertilizer and appropriate maintenance of optimum moisture conditions. On a monthly basis during soil treatment, soil samples will be collected from every 50 cubic yards and field screened by headspace using a PID. Every 2 months, progress soil samples will be collected from every 50 cubic yards, composited 4:1 in the laboratory, and analyzed for TPH as diesel, BTEX, and MTBE. HFA anticipates that mechanical cultivation alone will successfully remediate the soil in a time frame of less than 4 months. Upon completion of treatment, verification soil samples will be collected from every 50 cubic yards, composited 4:1 in the laboratory, and analyzed for TPH as diesel, BTEX, and'MTBE. HFA recommends that a soil cleanup level of TPH as diesel equaling 900 mg/kg and BTEX and MTBE at nondetectable levels is appropriate for this site. Upon completion of the soil treatment and with the approval of the BFDESD, the treated soil will be used by APEX Bulk Commodities as grading material on the treatment cell parcel. HOLGUIN, Mr, Howard H, Wines, III BFDESD FAI-LAN November 8, 1999 - Page 7 & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Holguln, Fahon & Assoclo,es, Inc., ,rus,s ~ho, you will find ,his RAP Addendum ,o your so,lsfactlon. If you hove any questions er require additional information, please con,ac, Mr. Mark Mogargee a, (651) $91-0517 or o, e-moll address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfo.com. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth J. Mitchell, REA Mark R. Magargee, G, RC_~/" ~ Associate Geologist Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, inc. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rrl Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Figure 3 TPH as Dlesel/Benzene/MTBE Concentrations in Soil Figure 4 TPH as Diesel Concentrations in Groundwater Figure 5 Proposed Treatment Cell Diagram Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results Attachment 1 Summary of Previous Work cc: Mr. James H. Fuller, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. ' Mr. Howard H. Wines, III [ HOLOUIN, BFDESD FAI IAN November 8, 1999 - Page 8 & ~IATES, INC. ENVJF:tONMENTAL MANAGEMENT [..~ONSULTANTS 'o o r '" *,'~ ~ ' ' I' .... -~ ..... '"' ' ~'"~'' '"" II ' I" z, ' ~"' ' A ' ~ ' O' X ~ ~,~'~- CALl :o :,'~-,;~e"~ ?'::. o' ~ o ~ ~ :~:u . .. ,..,.,.,..:.:,.~,~ ...:::..::.r...::..,..::. , ,~ : ", ,4~/ .,, · -: .... "l,f ~* ~f~ - /// "o _~2 o' o I" 'IL. II .' ~':~" ~'~-e ~' -~ (~?~'~' ~= '~ ', '- ' "~ · ~ .'" ~ ,'"1:~ '~'~ '~.. .. ~ ~ ~ ,....~........: ......... : ............ ? , I ..~ .... .. ~ _~/~' :a',, ~':~ ~' % .k~ '.~(F~--:o ~ '. '~.. ,,11'. ~:.:.. ',~:?, o~ o o', ,,o b ~o.o '~. ,.~_ (i1-7 ~:, ~/~~~ ~,,..;::.,~ ,, ." . . ,~ ? o. ~ ~'~ F ...... I~nh:~.:~/ o ,.,;, o ,-.. I; o o..~ ':lot , o .~ " '~' ' Il YII~ .. ~ ... ~ · :~'1 o. o o '~ '~ i AII/~ .... .'.?~'¢',: -)Y~~I~ ~.~ _ ,"" o ' o o'~.., . o ..:~ ~*' o' O:~o .- '"'~'~" ~ ,,; ,u~;~~ . ~;:.. ~_., : ~t .......... , ............. -, ,. ~~ ., i~ ..:0.,, ~ %=a~-',,~ .~ / -- .,;~;~ . I , ,_,.:"~ ~:'~~ ~A> ~.,',/~"?' ~ ~.- ~ /_'~"-~ ..... m'~/.?~'~q~.~:- ~/~-' ', _:,.t~-~ ~ ~' .................. '.'.... ".{~ ..,.~:~ ....... ~ ~ 1~ .~'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ....... ~.~.~.~, -~,~ ~ .. , ~ ' . tl ,, ~~ .......... i _-- Z'--' f L~'/~( ~ ~ LEGEND ~PEX BULK COmmODITIES, INC. 0 0.5 1 MILE ~ i i ~ i ~ ._~ ~ ~. 2111 BRIOYN ~NE 0 1,~ 2.~ 3.~ 4,~ 5,~ FEET IN BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~'~ ~ - ~ FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP 0 05 ~ KILOMETER d USGS OILOAL[ 7.5 MINUTE SERIES QUADRANGLE ~ ~O~U~, Mr. Howard H, Wines, tll ~ HOLGUIN, BFDESD ~ FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 9 ~ &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS EXISTING 2,000-GALLON DIESEL AST B-3 PROPOSED -.~ TREATMENT CELL ~I, LOCATI ON /~ 12,0F000 -RGMAELRLO N \ ..... CONCRETE BRICYN LANE LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRICYN LANE ~[ SOIL BORING BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1999: RRI Mr, Howard H, Wines, III [HOLOUIN, BFDESD FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 10 & ASS~IATE..S, INC. ENVII:ZlC]NMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS t 5 ~ ND/ND/ND 10 ND/ND/ND 15 2,900/0.012/ND B-3 17 30,000/0.5610.074 PROPOSED ~ TREATMENT CELL LOCATION ~ 14--r- 9,800/0.1/0.2 14T ND/ND/NE ~ 5--1.- ND/ND/NDN /ND ND 18-.-~ 17000/039/05818-1".-- ND/ND/NE \ lO-t- D / / ' .-: ' / ~'- 5 'm'- ND/ND/ND \ 15--~- 2,600/0.0061/ND ! .......... efK-1E / B-l-'" OTK-1C ~~ 10~ I~ND~D ~~ 15~ NO/ND/NO BRICYN LANE LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 211 1 BRICYN ~NE ~ SOIL BORING BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA ~ DEPTH OF SAMPLE (fbg) FIGURE 3 - TPH AS DIESEWBENZENE/MTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL ~/~/~ TPH AS DIESE~BENZEN~MTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (mg/kg) ~O~, ~ · ~SSOC~T~S, [~C. REVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1999: Mr. Howard H. Wines, I11 [~ HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 11 & ASSOC~T~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS OF HYDROCARBON-CONTAINING GROUNDWATER / B-3 PROPOSED [ ~, ";. ~ TREATMENT CELL '. LOCATION ~ ! 80,000 ~MW-3 -" -' , . _ B-l-" . ..... ' \ \ :,-~- ~\~, ........ : ~ ~ ",,'~_ _ 1~.500 MW-1 ;. 800 -~- ....... ~ . BRICYN LANE_ 0 20 40 , [ LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRICYN LANE ,j~ TEMPORARY WELL POINT BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION FIGURE 4 - TPH AS DIESEL CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER # TPH AS DIESEL CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER (pgA) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. tEVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1999: RRI Mr. Howard H, Wines, Ill HOLGUIN, BFDESD ~ FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 12 ~ & ASSC~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 400' ~ ~ ~ BERM TREATMENT CELL DETAIL SOIL , SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 5 - PROPOSED TREATMENT CELL DIAGRAM HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1999: RRI · Mr, Howard H. Wines, III HOLGUIN, BFDESD FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 13 & ASSOCIATF , INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH ID DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 8020 N/A REPORTING LIMIT 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.02 N/A B-1 8-4-99 5 B-1-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 B-1-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 15 B-1-15 2,600 0.0061 0.031 0.86 1.1 ND A B-2 8-4-99 5 B-2-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A __ 8-4-99 10 B-2-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A ! 8-4-99 15 B-2-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND A B-3 I 8-4-99 5 B-3-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 B-3-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 15 B-3-15 2,900 0.012 0.04 0.25 1.5 ND A 8-4-99 17 B-3-17 30,000 0.56 13 35 71 0.074 A B-4 8-4-99 5 B-4-5 170 ND 0.0094 0.022 0.12 ND A 8-4-99 10 B-4-10 12 ND ND ND ND ND A I 8-4-99 15 B-4-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 17 B-4-17 ND ND ND ND ND ND A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24, 1999. Mr. Howard H. Wines, Iii HOLGUIN, BFDESD .,.,,.......~ FAHAN November 8, 1999 - Page 14 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (~ONSULTANTS TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FLOATING SAMPLE DATE DEPTH TO PRODUCT SOURCE SAMPLED GROUNDWATER THICKNESS TPH AS DIESEL REF (feet-MSL) (fbg) (feet) (l~g/I) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 {M) N/A CCR TITLE 22 MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL 100 N/A MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT 50 N/A B-1 8-4-99 -18 0.00 1,5001 A B-2 8-4-99 ~ 18 0.00 800 A B-3 8-4-99 ~18 0.00 80,0001 A B-4 8-4-99 ~18 0.00 1,400! A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24. 1999. ~ HOL©UIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ASS(2~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK EXISTING 2,000-GALLON DIESEL AST ~ FORMER ~ \ 12,000-GALLON St.~B \ 5UILL)INU \ FORMER BRICYN I~NE o 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 1 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA DATE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH SAMPLE ID DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 8020 J N/A REPORTING LIMIT 10 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.02 N/A Western End of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1W-14 9,800 0.1 2.6 3 12 0.2~ A 1-22-99 18 TK-1W-18 17,000 0.39 6.8 6 33 0.58 A Centerof 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1C-14 ND ND ND 0.0068 0.026 NDi A 1-22-99 18 TK-lC-18 24 ND ND ND 0.013 ND' A Eastem End of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1E-14 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 1-22-99 18 TK-1E-18 ND ND NDND ND ND A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated February 25, 1999. Health and Safety Plan Page 5 STATE HIGHWAY SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES ,,, SAN DIEGO LU >-- Q z ,'r' .,~ U.I .~ BAKERSFIELD "' ~ '" ILl ,,~ -.I 0 -- ROSEDALE HIGHWAY BURR STREET~ SITE LOCATIO STOCKDALE HIGHWAY BRICYN LANE'"~- · APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. ~ MERCY SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL 2111 BRICYN LANE --~ 400 OLD RIVER ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA c~ BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MAP ~ (805) 663-6000 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. L D March 30, 1999 Denny Wyatt Apex Bulk Commodities P.O. Box Drawer A Adelanto, CA 92301 RE: Laboratory results from preliminary site assessment conducted at the Apex Bulk Commodities, 2111 Bricyn Lane. F~RE CHIEF Permit #BR-0247. RON FRAZE A~MINISTRA'~/E SERVICES Dear Mr. Wyatt: 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805)~5-1349 Upon review of the recently submitted laboratory results from your facility, this office has determined that the extent of the contamination SUPPRESSION SERVICES plume, associated with the diesel underground storage tardc previously 2101 "H' Street Bakersne~a, CA 93301 located on your property, has not been adequately defined. VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (505) 395-1349 This office requires (in accordance with Chapter 6.7 of the PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. California Health and Safety Code and Chapter 16, Title 23 of the Bakersfield, CA 93301 California Code of Regulations) that further assessment be done to def'me VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination plume. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. Please submit a work plan for further assessment, to this office, Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805)326-3979 within 30 days from receipt of this letter. The workplan should follow FAX(505) 326-0576 guidelines found in: Appendix A -Reports, Tri - Regional Board Staff TRAINING DIVISIO, Recommendations for Preliminary evaluation and Investigation of 5642 Victor Ave. Underground Tank Sites; July 6, 1990. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399.4697 FAX (805)399-5763 Additionally, be advised that oversight cost for this project will be billed to you at a rate of $75.00 per hour. If you have any questions, please call me at (661) 326-3979. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey, Director Office of Environmental Services REH/dlm cc: S. Underwood M. Magargee, Holguin Fahan & Assoc., Inc. S:\USTFORMS\UST. L2 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE (LEAK) / CONTAMINATION SITE REPORT REPORT BEEN FILED ? YES [] NO ' [] YES [] NO MI ~ ~ ~ Y~ REPRESENIING ~ ~NE~PE~TOR ~ REGION~ BOARD ~PA~ OR ~ENCY NA~ ~ L~ALAGENCY ~ OTHER CI~ OF B~FIE~ ADDRESS 1715 C~STER AVE~ BaSFID CA 93301 ~ ~ 8TA~ ZIP ~ NAME [ ~NT~T PERSON ~ PHONE ~ B~ CO~ODITIES ~ UNKNOWN ~ D~ ~ATT ( ) P O BOX D~R A ~S~O CA 92301 ~RE~ C~ FAClLI~ N~E (IF ~PL~ABL~ OPE~TOR ~ PHONE ~ B~ CO~ODITIES{ ( ) ADDRESS 2111 BRI~ ~g B~SFI~ ~ 93304 CRO~ STREET L~AL AGENCY AGENCY N~E ~NT~T PERSON PHONE CI~ O~ B~RSYIg~ ~I~ DgP~T ~P~ ~ (661 )326-3979 REG~N~ BOARD' PHONE CEN~ V~L~ ( ) (~) NAME QUANTI~ LOST (~LLONS) DIES~ F~L UNKNOWN ¢~ ~ UNKNOWN DA~ DI~VERED ~ HOW DIS~VER~ ~ INV~IORY ~NTR~ ~ SU~URFACE MONITORING ~ NUIS~CE CONDmONS 0 .I 3.l 2 .I 9 .I 9 ~1 9 ~ ~ TANK~ ~ TANK REMOVAL ~ OTHER oA~ D,~HARG~ ~. M~HOD USeD TO STOP D~SCHAR~E (C.ECK ~L ~AT .As D[SC~.S~ a~N STOP.~ ~ ~ .~.Am TANK SOURCE OF DI~HARGE CAUSE(S) ~ TANK mAK ~ UNKNOWN ~ OVERFI~ ~ RUP~R~AILURE ~ SPILL ~ PIPING L~K ~ O~E" ~ ~RROSION ~ UNKNOWN ~ OTHER CHECK ONE ONLY ~ UND~RMINm ~ SOILONLY ~ G~UNDWATER ~ DRINKING WATER - (CHECK ONLY IF WATER WELLS ~ ACmALLY BEEN AFFEC~O) CHECK ONE ONLY ~ NO ACTION T~N ~ PR~IMINARY S~ A~E~MENT ~RKP~N SUaM~ED ~ POLLUTION CHARAC~RI~TION ~ LE~ BEI~ ~NFIRMED ~ PR~IMI~RY SI~ ~E~MENT UNDERWAY ~ P~T CLE~UP MONITORING IN PROGRE~ ~ REMED~ON P~N ~ CASE CLUED ~E~UP ~MPLE~D OR UNNECE~AR~ ~ CLE~UP UNDERWAY CHECK APPROPR~TE{~~ACTION(S) ~ EXCAVA~ & DISUSE (E~ ~ REMOVE FREE PRODUCT (FP) ~ ENH~CED BIO DEG~DATION (1~ ~ C~ Sl~ (CD) ~ EXCAVATE & TREAT (E~ ~ PUMP & TREAT GROUNDWA~R (O~ ~ REPACK SUPPLY (RS) ~ ~NTAINMENT BARRIER (CB) ~ ~ ACT~N REQUIRED (HA) ~ TREA~ENT AT H~P (HU) ~ VENT ~lk ~S) ~ VACUUM EXT~CT ~ ~ OTHER H~(~ HOL(o IN, FAHAN & AS CIASFF , INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS February 25, 1999 ~ Mr. Howard H. Wines, III City of Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 subject: TANK CLOSURE REPORT FOR APEX BULK COMMODITIES 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Wines: This report presents the results of soil sampling performed by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) in association with the removal of one 12,000-gallon diesel UST from the above-referenced site (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The tank removal activities were performed under permit with the Bakersfield Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division (BFDHMD) in association with the replacement of the diesel UST with a diesel AST at the site. BACKGROUND Apex Bulk Commodities (Apex) contracted with BC Enterprises to remove one 12,000-gallon, single-walled, steel, diesel UST (see Figure 2- Plot Plan). On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed. BC Enterprises contracted with HFA to provide an environmental technician under the direct supervision of the undersigned state of California registered geologist to collect soil samples at the direction of Mr. Howard H0 Wines, Iii, with the BFDHMD. TANK CLOSURE SOIL SAMPLING On January 22, 1999, soil samples TK- lW-14 and TK- lW- 18; TK-1 C-14 and TK-1 C-18; and TK- 1 E- 14 and TK-1E-18 were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively (see Figure 2 for the soil sample locations). All sampling equipment was washed with a non-phosphate cleanser, pre-rinsed with tap water, and finally rinsed with delonlzed water prior to sampling. The soil samples were collected from the backhoe bucket Immediately following excavation. The soil samples were stored In 2-Inch-diameter brass tubes, sealed with TeflonTM liners and end caps, labeled, placed In an ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS * 'ENGINEERS Contaminated Site Assessments * Phase I Audits * Site Remediation * Hazardous Waste Management 143 Soulh Figueroa Slreet 16570 Aston Street 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite I 3001 South 351h Street, Suite C-I 1 Ventura, California 93001 Irvine, California 92606 Bakersfield, California 93308 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (805) 652-0219 (949) 442-6665 (805) 391-0517 (800) 789-0219 · (602) 426-1000 (805) 652-0793 FAX (949) 724-0446 FAX (805) 391-0826 FAX {602) 426-0113 FAX lnternet: fJrst_last@hfa.con-~ Internet: first_lasl@hfa.com lntemel: first_last@hfa.com Internet: fJrst_last@ph.hfa.col'q HOL©UI Mr, Howord H. Wines, III FAHAN BFDHMD ~ February 25, 1999 - Page 2 &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ice chest at a temperature of less than 4oC, and transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis. Sample identification and chain-of-custody procedures were followed for the samples to ensure sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time of collection to the ultimate destination. The sample labels identified the job number, sampler, date and time of collection, and a sample number unique to each sample. ANALYTICAL METHODS AND RESULTS The soil samples were analyzed for TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M) and BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel U ST (see Figure 2'for the soil sample locations, Table 1 - Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results, and Attachment 1 for the laboratory report). RINSATE AND STORAGE TANK DISPOSAL Prior to tank removal, the UST was triple rinsed. The rinsate was transported by · MP Environmental Services, Inc., to Crosby & Overton"s disposal facility in Long Beach, California, under Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest (see Attachment 2 for a copy of the Non RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest). An LEL meter was utilized to verify that the hydrocarbon vapor concentrations were less than 5 percent of the LEL. Subsequently, 20 pounds of dry ice per 1~]0[] gallons of tank capacity was introduced into the UST, and oxygen metering was conducted to verify that the level of oxygen within the UST was less than 12 percent. With the approval of the BFDHMD, the storage tank was removed, placed on a flatbed truck, and transported to Valley Tree's Bakersfield facility for destruction. CONCLUSIONS Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, diesel hydrocarbons were found to be present beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST. The BFDHMD will likely require additional investigation of the vertical and lateral limit of diesel-containing soil and assessment of the potential for the release to Impact groundwater resources. The BFDHMD may also require active or passive mitigation activities associated with the former diesel UST at the site. HOLGUI ,JN Mr. Howard H. Wines, III FAFtAN BFDHMD ~ February 25, 1999 ~ Page 3 &.ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS HFA recommends that the client submit an application to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)/Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF) for reimbursement of all future costs (less applicable deductible) associated with the assessment and potential remediation of the diesel release of the site. HFA Is available to assist the properly owner In preparing the SWRCB/USTCF claim application. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Apex Bulk Commodities and Its representative, BC Enterprises, as it pertains to the referenced property in Bakersfield, California. The services performed by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., were conducted in a manner consistent with the level of core and skill ordinarily exercised by members of Its profession currently practicing under sim,ar conditions In the state of California. No other warranty Is expressed or implied. Thank you for this opportunity to have been of service, If you hove any questions regarding this report or the Information contained herein, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (805) 39i-05i7 or at e-moil address Mark_Magargee@bk.hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, -Bradley C, Sk~ield M . Environmental Technician Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rrl Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Attachment 1 Laboratow Report Attachment 2 Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest cc: Mr. Page Dalby, Apex Bulk Commodities Mr. Bob Underwood, BC Enterprises ,N~ BFDHMD FAH~N February 25, 1~:2 - Page 4 & ~LATF_~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS . ~ o , ~ ~, ~4 -- ~ , ~,,..?;,'".. o. ' ' ,jh.C ... ~ ~ , ::."'/ "x~- ~ .... .~ .~ ,.,,Z .................... r,,,,,,,~ .... ~,,~ # ,i '.~ ' . . ,o ,,. · '~ '. ~,," ,' ~ ~ ' _~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ...... o ~" '~'' o > ~ ~ ~1 ~ Oil Sump ~ ~ ~ · ~. I ' ,, o ' ,>': 22 '. ~" -/" ,-- 't oO~i.:,- , o;., ..... ~// o:~ ~. "* ' ;" '~--- ~ ~ OATION" ' , --- , ( ~"~:' , - //....~ , .~s~ SIT~L~.. ~ .. . ,., ,~. ,, ~ ., o.. ., .' .'~.aco 0~3' h ,~ ~/~ ~ ,' . IL.i , Y:~l'~¥i~ .... : ,. ~ .~ . : · [ ,,~ , ~stro 7 ~ '~, : ,' i '.: ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. , ,, ', o z // >' ~' /~' ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~~.~.~ -..~=~:.~ ..... ~ ~ -/~] / x,~:~- , i ~~ ~ ~ ~.', ~.~ ~ ~__ :~,.~ ..... .: r. ' ~ , ~ ~ .~, .... .~.. ?~ . ¥~' "~: 't' '. '. "'. I ~ ~, ,I LEGEND APEX BULK 0 0.5 1 ~LE ~ 2111 BRICYN ~NE I I I I I I 'l ,I I I I / 0 ~,~ ~,~ a,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~[[T ~ BAKERSFIELD, OALIFO~NIA ~ ~ H ~ , z ~ FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP 0 0.5 1 KILOMETER USGS OILDALE 7.5 MINUTE SERIES QUADRANGLE~ ~O~, ~ ~ ~OC~, ~C. ~ HOLGUI ,N~ Mr, Howard H. Wines, III BFDHMD FAHAN February 25, 1999 Page 5 ~ - ~ & ~IATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS EXISTING 3/4' A/C A~'~~7 DOUB~i~V(~LLED D/C CONDUIT 36"-SQUARE PIPING SUMP FORMER 12,000-GALLON L UST BUILDING TO )E REMOVED LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. {EVISION DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1999: RRI BFDHMD FAHAN February 25, 1999 - Page 6 &.ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS I,~~~' HOLGUINi FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. LABORATORY REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 143 South Figueroa Street · Ventura, California 93001 · (805) 652-0219 · FAX: (805) 652-0793 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS February 15, 1999 Page 1 CLIENT: Analyzed By: T. Karageorge BC Enterprises Sampled By: B. Skenfield Uni ts: mc/kg Matrix: Soil PROJECT: APEX Bulk Commodities Analysis Methods: BTEX: EPA 8020 TPH: 8015 -M CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION CONSTITUENT TPH- TPH- Ethyl Total Percent Lab Sample Dates Sampled, Gasoline Diesel Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes MTBE Surrogate No. No. Received and Tested RL RL RL RL RL RL RL Recovery 990138 TK-lW-14 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/28/99 9800 .1 2.6 3 12 .20 190% i0 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990139 TK-lW-18 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/28/99 17000 .39 6.8 6 33 .58 I0 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990140 TK~iC-14 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/27/99 ND ND ND .0068 .026 ND 166% 10 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990141 TK-lC-18 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/27/99 24 ND ND ND .013 ND 147% I0 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990142 TK-1E-14 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/28/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 103% I0 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990143 TK-1E-18 1/22/99 1/27/99 1/27/99 ND ND ND ND ND ND 104% 10 .005 .005 .005 .005 .02 990~3~. 99o140 .ISH SUR.~^TE RECOV~n~ Oo~ TO ,~TnlX ~N?E~.~,CE 990139 su. Ro~^TE No~ RE¢OVE~EO OU~ ~O N^TR~X ~.T~R~n~CE R L = Reporting Limit (mayvarywithDilutionFactor) ND = Not Detected at or above RL Lab Certification: CAELAP ~1878; 1/31/00 Laboratory Ma/lager: HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Easlman Ave., Unit 1, Venfura, CA 93003¥(805) 550-7750¥FAX (805) 550-5810 MEIHOD BLANK REPORI REPORI OF ANALYTICAL RESULIS Dale Analyzed; 27-Jan-99 aC Batch ID; 1/27/99 Analyzed By: T. Kargeorge Inslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC- I Anc]lysis Melhod: 8015-m/8020 CONCENIRAIION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (IPH) WITH BTEX DISIINCIION in rog/Kg {soil) TPH- Elhyl Total Clien! Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Malrix RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND I0 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile Iud hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method rangetromC4toCI2. Analytes reported as ND were not present above the stated limit otdetection. RL = Melhod Reporling LJmil ND = Nol Delecled al or above RL LAB CEF?I'IFICAIION: CAELAP //1878; 1/31/2000 HOLGUIN FAHAN c% ASSOCIATES INC ,~_.a~~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eoslmon Ave., Unil 1, Venturo, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) $50-6810 METHOD BLANK REPORI REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Dote .~,no!yzed: 27-Jan-99 QC Botch ID: 1/27/99 Analyzed By: T. Kargeorge inslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC- I ,qnalysis Melhod: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in mg/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Tolal Client Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RE RE ,RE RE RL 36140 Melhod Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.0t5 ,~. .i'.:2'.,%' Z. EbS:,, '..E '.. '2 ~? :::'- ~.'Tx\&'~.~, . :?=.~-il. j.r :7. -;:~ . ........ ' . '. ~..':; ~:?,.,~_~:= ".. ., ... ',.' '."...E ~~<: %:~~~ ~~~:~¥~?~, ~.:.. ,,~::~ :. :. ~.. ..... .... -. -.. .. . & .... =~~4'- -- ' ..... ~t~ ~-,'~'~ ~- "~ ~i~ .- ..... '~F:~E .~.~-~:,a~, '..r.~. ' ~ ~. , .... -:-.: .' ,.-;--., .- , .... ~ ......... ',. :.. ,.. ,.'.'5- '. . ............... ~ .~..~ ...... '.~ . ~, ~ ,, =55~-~'5. Volatile~l hyd~Ocarbons;a~e'quantilaled against a oasoline slandard. Hydrocarbons defected by lhis method :~iz::: ,a~:~::C~ongo ~rom'~4 ~o ~z~Afla yles re'Porled asND weie not'preSenl above lhe slalea ,mu al oe~ecnon. :' .' . '. 5 .~i.=~' ,qb~~.¢~-~..:., ' ...~,~,5~.+~:.':'~ ....... :,~:.:~;.:,:..~,,:.., .... :.:~'.....' ~'q.-t~.'"7'5,5' ':~ .,' -: "':-.:-.::: '-.' , ". -:5 ..... :. '..' ....... I ;,. ' ' ~ ~ :eY;.,'~ , ; '~: ", ........ =' '."= ' ..... "~' ' '-.- " .' ..', .-" - ~~~. ';- . ~. ,... .-- ,. :,.~m,.,~ - ' ,' - ..',, , -.- , ~ ...... ; .~..t~ .... .'. ,.,.z,.., -: · . - .. ...,~~.,... ...... ,,:,,.,:.. ....... ~<~, ......... .... ,.. .... . . ' ~":t~X-JL.. ~ 7~ ' i~,,: .... ,~'~ ....... :-' .... . · x.'.. 5~.,-,::~,.}. ';~-~.'..:; :T-' ~~'~"" ' .,:,. · . ' :a,.~,.~ .......... ". ~'~'75." ' - · . '- "" -- ' ' ':'"': .¢ .'~;~,E?,k,: -,.. S ~**.'. ' ' - ..... ...- ~ -,~*. - "~,'~ '">' .~,v .... :. - ........... ~,~,~(~ ..... ,~,,,~~.. ~ .................. .... .... , HOLGUIN FAHAN'gs ASSOCIATES INC. ~ ENVIRONW1FNYA/ LABOFtAYORIES 2550 Eos~mon~, ,,~,.e.,., Unii 1 , Ven~uro, CA 93003~(8C.~} :. 7750~FAX ,~:~ .,, 650-6810 METHOD BLANK REPORT REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Date .: r o~,,?"- ~' 27-Jan-99 C'C Bolct-~ ~D: I.;27/99 Anoh,,zed ~y: T. Kargeorge Instrument,~,.'~' HP 5890 GC- i Analysis MeIt:od: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in mg/Kg (soil) TPH- Elhyl Tolat Client Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lob No. Sample No. Iv~olrJx RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Melhod Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND lO 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 · · ', -, .: · ........ . :' .,,~ ,:~,;~~~.~. ~..,..~,. ~ _.-.,¥.~?s:~?;',';,;::.: :'-.,~ --~; n~. ~.'~ "-"--,:,';.'~-..' t-~z'?~,t~:',: ":;" ~ ~:~V..~4.;.,~,:, · , ' ', ~ · '-.~:~ ~-'-~' ='' ' :' ~~ ~-:.._:~:~"' ~*~ .... --, ...... -~Z-~:L-:~y=. Z~':~ ;z ::-.:.:~:_ ·: : z.7-' ' .-----<'.:'. .... --'-.',::..~,t.Z~: ~k~;,~ .~.'"~7,,' '~~~:~~.'~7~.':~""':- :'~:,- -: ....... .'7" ,"-_: :::.'7 '.~M ........ '...:Z'.....7 ,:;:c..z:'z:: t:.'.b': ' -' --'-"-'-'""-~T,:~~~~ .;~-~:~ ,.~.~.~.. ,~,~~~ .... ~'n,.~...~,-~~-*--,.--~ - --::--:' .. .U:~,~-~. Volatile fuel hydrocarbon~ are quantitated again~l a gasoline ~tandard. Hydrocarbon~ delecled by lhi~ method .-:,~::.:.? · .?-.~,~( r~nge from..~l~:~nal~te~ reporled"~ ND were nol P'f~'senl above lhe slated hmd ol de e ., :~..":'7 : '.':: .f 4:.~.q~%~-~.~:z~?-~~,~?~?~. ?.~..',~.~...., , ,~ · ·" , .... ' .6::'~.: :zj;r~;.~'~'~' · , .-. · ....... :' ~ ..'.: :. . .:.: .- ; . .... .... .:";: "'-'~ :,t ..... :'r' '- d Re ~" ' '" ............... ' ' " ......... ' ' .~;~.r~iaMe~~ . - :,.,.. ..... ~ . ;... ....... .... ..,. : · . . .. . ;, . , . · ,, ~ ;~: -~ , .......... , ..: ..... . ~'..,~*-. . . , . '~ .,,. :-,., . . . .,~; -,~.. ,... .. ....... . ~,,,~, ] ~,....,,~ R~ .-, ., ..... , ..... , ........... . .......... . ...~, :~, ......... ~ ....... ~.,..,,,.~., ..... .. ............ .... ...... ' .'-.~" ':.:,. ~~'~:.~,: ~'::.~,~ :AT.;;j'..('.7 7 ' ". -. ' ' '.'." '.. ': . ... : ,..~F~~-' .,.. ~...~,, ..... · ..... ..,,~, ,~: .... .. ,'. ...... · :~-~ HOLGUIN FAHAN & ASSOCIATES INC ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Easlman Ave., Unit 1, Venturc~, CA 93003¥(805) 550-7750¥FAX (805) 550-5810 METHOD BLANK REPORI REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULI$ Date Analyzed: 27-Jan-99 QC Batch ID: 1/27/99 Analyzed By: T. Kargeorge lnslrumenl ID: HP 5890 GC- I Anatysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENIRAIION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (IPH) WIIH BTEX DISTINCTION in mg/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Total Client Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL RL RI RL RL 36140 Melhod Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 Volatile fuel hydrocarbons are quantitated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons detected by this method range fromC4 foCI2. Analyles reported as ND were not present above the stated limit of detection. RL = Melhod Reporting Limit ND = Nol Delec~ed at or above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP # 1878; I/31/2000 HOBGUIN, FAHAN c% ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eos~mon Ave., Unil 1, Venlura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6310 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 27-Jan-99 Lab No: 990134 Matrix: Soil Ins~.rument ID: HPS890 GC-1 Dilution Foctor: Malrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 17.79 20 89 45-158 Benzene 0.00 16.99 20 ' 85 59-138 Toluene 0.00 16.67 20 83 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 15.11 20 76 55-123 m, p-Xylen es 0.00 19.20 20 96 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.12 20 81 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results HOLGUIN FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6810 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 27-Jan-99 Lab No: 990134 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc. Jppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 17.18 20 ' 86 45-158 Benzene 0.00 15.99 20 80 59-138 Toluene 0.00 16.48 20 82 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 15.40 20 77 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 18.97 20 95 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.26 20 81 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 16.00 20 80 45-158 Benzene 0.00 15.52 20 78 59-138 [oluene 0.00 16.34 20 82 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 15.40 20 77 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 18.53 20 93 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.03 20 80 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 86 80 83 7.1 <22 Benzene 80 78 79 3.0 < ] 4 Toluene 82 82 82 0.9 <] 4 Ethylbenzene 77 77 77 0.0 < 16 m,p-Xylenes 95 93 94 2.3 < 16 o-Xylene 81 80 81 1.4 < 15 , ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-6810 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 27-Jan-99 Lab No: 990134 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-] Dilution Factor: i Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) 'Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits 'MTBE 0.00 16.91 20 85 45-158 :Benzene 0.00 15.65 20 78 59-138 Toluene 0.00 16.49 20 82 59-133 ,Ethylbenzene 0.00 15.34 20 77 55-123 m, p-Xylenes 0.00 18.79 20 94 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.22 20 ' 81 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 15.5 i 20 78 45-158 Benzene 0.00 15.22 20 76 '59-138 Toluene 0.00 ] 6.54 20 83 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 15.79 20 79 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 16.82 20 94 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.19 20 81 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits MTBE 85 78 81 8.6 <22 Benzene 78 76 77 2.8 < 14 Toluene 82 83 83 0.3 <14 Ethylbenzene 77 79 78 2.9 < 16 m,p-Xylenes 94 94 94 0.2 <16 o-XyJene 81 81 ' 8 ] 0.2 < 15 HOLGUIN FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eoslman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 550-,5810 MEIHOD BLANK REPORT REPORI OF ANALYIICAL RESULIS Date Analyzed: 28-Jan-99 QC Batch ID: 1/28/99 Analyzed By: T. Kargeorge Instrumenl ID: HP 58?0 GC- I Analysis Method: 8015-m/8020 CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (IPH) WITH BTEX DISTINCTION in mg/Kg (soil) TPH- Ethyl Tolal Client Gasoline Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RL RL RL RL RL 36140 Method Blank Soil ND ND ND ND ND tO 0.005 0.005 0.0 I5 0.015 Volalile Iuel hydrocarbons are quanlilated against a gasoline standard. Hydrocarbons delected by this method rangeJromC4 toC12. Anaiyles reported as ND were no! present above lhestatedlimiloJdetection. RL = Method Reporling Limit tqD = Not Detected al or above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP # 1878; 1/31/2000 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~,.,lm~m.l~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA 93003¥(805) 650-7750¥FAX (805) 650-58]0 Sample ID: MS / MSD Date Analyzed: 28-Jan-99 Lab No: 990145 Matrix: Soil Instrument ID: HP5890 GC-1 Dilution Factor: 1 Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA 8020 Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spike Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 16.49 20 82 45-158 Benzene 0.00 15.25 20 76 59-138 Toluene 0.00 16.62 20 83 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 14.59 20 73 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 19.94 20 100 53-135' o-Xylene 0.00 16.38 20 82 59-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) Conc.(ppb) (%) Limits MTBE 0.00 17.10 20 86 45-158 Benzene 0.00 15.88 20 79 59-138 Toluene 0.00 16.59 20 83 59-133 Ethylbenzene 0.00 14.34 20 72 55-123 m,p-Xylenes 0.00 19.81 20 99 53-135 o-Xylene 0.00 16.21 20 81 59-130 Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike Matrix Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits !MTBE 82 86 84 3.6 <22 Benzene 76 79 78 4.0 < 14 I'oluene 83 83 83 0.2 < 14 Ethylbenzene 73 72 72 1.7 < 16 "n,p-Xylenes 100 99 99 0.7 <16 o-Xylene 82 81 81 1.0 < 15 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Easlman Ave., Unit 1, Ventura, CA ?3003¥(805) 550-7750¥FAX (805) 550-5810 METHOD BLANK REPORI REPORT OF ANALYIICAI. RESULTS QC Batch ID · 2/5199 Date Extracted: 3-Feb-99 Instrumenl ID · HP 6890 GC-3 Date Analyzed · 5-Feb-99 Analysis Melhod: 8015M Analyzed By ' TDK CONCENIRAIION OF TOTAL PEIROtEUM HYDROCARBONS (tph) AS DIESEL in rog/Kg (soil) TPH- Client Diesel Lab No. Sample No. Matrix RE 36196 Method Blank Soil ND I0.0 Extractable Iud hydrocarbons are quantitated against a diesel standard. Hydocarbons detected by this method range from CI0 faC24. Analytesreporledas ND were not presenl above the slated limit of detection. RL = Method Reporting Limit ND = Not Delected c~t or above RL LAB CERTIFICATION: CAELAP #1878; l/3~/2000 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES 2550 Eastman Ave., Unit 1, Ven~'ura, CA 93003¥(805) 550-7750¥FAX (805) 650-58]0 Sample ID: MS &MSD Date Exlrac~ed: 3-Feb-99 Lab No: 990228 Date Analyzed: 5-Feb-99 Instrument ID: HP 6890 GC~3 Matrix: Soil Matrix Spike Worksheet EPA Method 8015-M Matrix Spike Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(UG) Conc.{UG) Conc.(UG} (%} Limits TPH as 2.725 13.0 10 103 35-165 Diesel Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Compound Sample Matrix Spk. Dup. Spike Sol. Recovery Control Conc.(UGJ Conc.(UG} Conc.(UG) (%) Limits TPH as 2.725 12.6 10 99 35-165 Diesel Average Recovery & RPD Data Compound Spike MairJx Spk. Dup Average %RPD Control Recovery Recovery Recovery Limits TPH as 103 99 101 3.8 <31 Diesel .c~.';r;.~l~.:~ ~;t~l:.":l~q~ '~:' ~ .... ':," :~' '~'~ "~ ~' ,, :~,~,:~.,,x rl~:'~~.~ i~ ~;~' :' ' . .',~ CHAiN.OF.CUSTODY :~: .:~.. ,q, .... RECORD: '~;~':~ : ~' "~'~~; , Client Contac~Phone No .... ~ '~l~hd'¢b'~A to .... ~ .:~: :.~ -,, Client Name~ ~r,~ Project Name ~ ~ Matrix (soil, Date ~me grou~ter (e.g.,~mplingl~ation, depth, ~ f ~ ~ ~ o ':~ ~:~1~ :'1~[~;~'~'0.e.'~~'~) ,. , . . :~ .~?q~.:?,~:~:.;~ .. :..-... : ;~'- , ~ ..... ~ ~ ' /~ ~ '" I ~i~U~;x:~:x' ~ ~ z~,':{'; · ,-, ::' ,' , ~./~"l:"(~l~'l~-:::~:;::-:,::u..:.:~.~ , , .. ,. ~ -- ~.. ,,,~ .. ' ~", I : i~i'~ ~ * ; ...... ~ , r4{ ~ . I~ I ~,~$ee~ve~e for required detach :.. ~.~[, . ~;':.:~' . · , . ~~ I ,:'~ .~ '~ .;~:~I?~I~??PRESERVATIVE ADDED?~.~ '" · .... ~1 '~' ,:~1~1~ '~ ........... ~ ~: ~ :flY' ~ ;~: : "t~ '~' ~ ~ . ,~,~.: ... ':, ~ ,~?;.~:~:~:t~:~: :.% -' · ~ .... ~... ,~ ~~:. ~'~ .:~...: ..... ~~4~-,~? ;;~: '. Reli~uish~ BF (S~a~g~B~n) Dat~lme R~ived For ~b~ By: (Slgna~re/Organizatlon) i Date~lme . .~,:.~ fnclude[g~lal~H~ds~m:.~:,~ ~.. Return sample(s)/c~ler to: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. · 3157 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield,;.Oalif°~ia'. ~tt~.~,; 933~~~'[7~"~"F~¢~~~(~ ~,~'(8~)% ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ &ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. NON-RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST State of California--Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved OMB No. 2050-0039 (Expires 9-30-99 ~ See Instructions on back o~e 6. Department of Toxic Substances Control P ease print or type. Form designed for use on elite ! 12-pitchl ~ Sacramento, California ...... ik UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1. G ..... tot's US EPA ID No. Mani~est Document No. 2. Page 1 Information in the shaded ~s not required by Federal law. /I:l%'l...-b?15 i I I ~.,.~neralor'AName and M~iling Address ~Sla~';~ni~sl;~ment;Nu~r;";? 2/// '-' -' ' ' ~z ....... :7/; 5. T .... porter I Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number ;~/~Ja~t~(l]~~~f,~:~¥J: 7. T .... par,er 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number 11 US DOT D .... i-ti-n 'in-i:,4 ................ / ' 12 Cant ..... 13. Total 4 Un n No. I Type Quanh~ wi/Vol 0 / 1 6. GENE~ATOS'S CESTIFIfATION: I ~ere6y declare that t~e contents o~ this consignment are fully a,d accurately ~escri~ed a6ove ~y proper skipp n9 name qn~ are c ass fled, pac~e~, marke~, an~ la~ele~, an~ are in all respects in proper condition for lransport~y ~ig~way according to applica61e international an~ nafiona/government regulations. I~ I om o large quanfi~ generator, I certi~ t~af I ~ave o proaram in p ace to reduce ~e volume and lox c ~ oF waste generot~ to t~e ~eoree ~ave ~eterm ne~ lo ~e econom ¢oy practicable and that Ihove selected the ~racticable method o~treatmenf storage or d sposal currently ava able fo me which minimizes he present and future threat fo human health and the environment OR, if I am a smafl quant ~ aenerator I have ma~e a ao~d faith efforl to m n mze my wasle aenerafion and se ect the best wasle mona ement me hod hat s available to me and lhat I can afford. - .... g _~r~t~/Typed N~me '/? ' ~ Signatu~... // ..//';. /,' I Mon~ Day Y~r ' I :: f17. Transport.r 1 A~nowled~.~t of R~c.ipt oJ Moteriols ¢~dlTyped Nome ~,~r. ~~ Month Do, ~ ~ 1~. Transporter ~k~ow~dfle&ent of~eceipt al Materials ~'L .... ~ Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year E 19. Discrepancy Indication Space F A C L I 20. Facifi~ Owner or Operator Certification of receipt o~ hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. T Printed/Typed Name I Signature ~ Monlh Day Year DTSC 8022A (4/97) Blue: GENERATOR SENDS THIS COPY TO DTSC WITHIN 30 DAYS. EPA 8700--22 To: P.O, Box 400, Sacramento, CA 95812-0400 CITY OF BAKEI FIELD I~A ~/~ OFFICE OF ~E~NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (805) $26-$979 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INFORMATION -- '7-~d' FACILITY NAME ~ ~a~ ~o~'~ '~ROSS STdEET TANK OWNER/OPERATOR ~~ PHONE NO. INSURANC~ CARRIER ~~ ~~ WO~NS bOM~ NO. COMPANY ~OZ ~,~, f~~ ~~.O~ NO. ~/- INSURANCE CAR~ER .~d.~ TA~K CLEA~I~G I~FQRMATIO~ ' WASTE TRANSPORTER IDENTIFICATION ~ER NAME OF RINSA~ DISPOSAL FACILI~ ~ FACILITY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER T,~ T~A~S~O~Tr~ t~O~*tIO~ COMP*~Y ~ ~~',~ P~ONENO.~-~Z~ UC~NSENO. . *ODRESS 1~ ~m~ ~d cl~ ~~~, ~z~~ T*N~ OESTINATION ~ Z~ TAN K IN FO RMATION CHEMICAL DATES CHEMICAL TANK NO. AGE VOLUME STORED STORED PREWOUSLY STOOD For Olticial t ;se ()hi?' Chevron Material Safety Data Sheet Page ! of 8 1. CHEHICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 PRODUCT NUMBER(S): CPS2700~ CPS272102 CPS272152 CPS272185 CPS275060 COMPANY IDENTIFICATION KMERGKNCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS Chevron USA Products Company HEALTH (24 hr)~ (800)231-0623 or Environmental, Safety, and Health (510)231-0623 (International) ~75 Market St., Room 2900 TRANSPORTATION (24 hr): CHEMTREC 'San Francisco, CA 94105-2856 (800)424-9300 or (202)483-7616 ~PRODUCT INFORMATION: (800):.":-5823 MSDS Requests (510' -5357 Technical 2. COMPOSITION/INFOR} "ON ON INGREDIENTS COMPOSITION COMMENT: All the components of this material are on the Toxic Substances Control Act Chemical Substances Inventory. The proportion compositions are given to allow for the various ranges of the components present in the whole product and may not equal 100%. 100.0 % DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 CONTAINING COMPONKNTS AMOUNT LIMIT/QTY AGENCY/TYPE D/ESEL FUEL NO. 2 Chemical Name: FUELS, DIESEL, NO. 2 CAS68476346 100.0% I-IDS DISTILLATE, MIDDLE Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, HYDRODESULFURIZED MIDDLE Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSD5 Number: 000525 NDA - No D6ta Available NA - Not Applicable P~ep~Ied acco[diD9 to the OS}~ Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFK ]9]C.]200) and the AKS! MSDS Standard (2400.]) by th~ To×Jco]ogy ~]~ Health Eisk A:sesBmeD! U;]i%, CRTC, P.O. Bo): (054, E/chmo;}d, CA 9480~ DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 Page 2 of ~ CAS64742809 GAS OIL, LIGHT Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, STRAIGHT RUN MIDDLE CAS64741442 KEROSENE Chemical Name: KEROSINE CAS8008206 HYDROSULFURIZED KEROSINE Chemical Name: KEROSINE, HYDRODESULFURIZED CAS64742810 CAT CRACKED DISTILLATE, LIGHT Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, LIGHT CATALYTIC CRACKED CAS64741599 TLV - Threshold Limit Value TWA - Time Weighted Average STEL - Short-term Exposure Limit TPQ - Threshold Planning Quantity RQ - Reportable Quantity cps - cusA Product Code CC - Chevron.Chemical Company --CAS - Chemical Abs~ct Service Number 3. HAZARDS IDBNTIFIC~TION ************************* EMERGENCY OVERVIE~ ************************* Pale yellow liquid. - CONBUSTIBLE - HARMFUL OR FATAL IF SWALLOWED - CAN ENTER LUNGS A~D CAUSE DAMAGE - CAUSES SKIN IRRITATION - CANCER HAZARD - PROLONGED OR REPEATED SKIN CONTACT HAY INCREASE THE RISK OF SKIN CANCER - KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS EYE: This substance is not expected to cause prolonged or significant eye irritation. SKIN: This substance is a moderate skin irritant so contact with the skin could cause prolonged (days) injury to the affected area. The degree of injury will depend on the amount of material that gets on the skin and the speed and thoroughness of the first aid treatment. If absorbed through the skin, this substance is considered practically non-toxic to internal organs. INGESTION: Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Da~a Available NA - Not Applicable '.DIESEl. FUEL NO. 2 Page 3 of 8 If swallowed, this substance is considered practically non-toxic to internal organs. Because o! the low viscosity of this substance, it can directly enter the lungs if it is swallowed (this is called aspiration). This can occur during the act of swallowing or when vomiting the substance. Once in the lungs, the substance is very difficult to remove and can cause severe injury to the lungs and death. INHALATION: Prolonged breathing of vapors can cause central nervous system effects. This hazard evaluation is based on data from similar materials. SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE: SKIN: May include pain or a feeling of heat, discoloration, swelling, and blistering. INHALATION: Central nervous system effects may include one or more of following: headache, dizziness, loss of appetite, weakness and loss of coordination. CARCINOGENICITY: This product contains a mixture of petr'oleum hydrocarbons called middle distillates (which means they boil between approXimately 350F and 700F). Because of this broad description, many products are considered middle distillates yet they are produced by a variety of different petroleum refining processes. Toxicology data developed on some middle distillates found that they caused positive responses in some mutageniCity tests and caused skin cancer when repeatedly applied to mice over~heir lifetime. This product may contain some middle distillates found to cause those ~dverse effects. -' 4. FIRST AID MEASURES No first aid procedures are required. However, as a precaution flush eyes with fresh water for 15 minutes. Remove contact lenses if worn. SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing. Wash skin thoroughly with soap and water. See a doctor if any signs or symptoms described in this document occur. Discard contaminated non-waterproof shoes and boots. Wash contaminated clothing. INGESTION: ' If swallowed, give water or milk to drink and telephone for medical advice. DO NOT make person vomit unless directed to do so by medical personnel..If medical advice cannot be obtained, then take the person and product container to the nearest medical emergency treatment center or hospital. INIIALATION: If any signs or symptoms as described in this document occur, move the person to fresh air. If any of these effects continue, see a doctor. NOTE TO PHYSICIANS: Ingestion of this product or subsequent vomiting can result in aspiration of light hydrocarbon liquid which can cause pneumonitis. Revision Number:_34 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 Page 4 of.'8 5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES FLASH POINT: (P-M) 125F (52C) Min. AUTOIGNITION: NDA FLAMMABILITY LIMITS (% by volume in air): Lower: 0.6 Upper: 4.7 EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: CO2, Dry Chemical, Foam and Water Fog. NFPA RATINGS: Health 0; Flammability 2; Reactivity 0. FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Liquid evaporates and forms vapor (fumes) which can catch fire and burn with explosive violence. Invisible vapor spreads easily and can be set on fire by many sources such as pilot lights, welding equipment, and electrical motors and switches. Fire hazard is greater as liquid temperature rises above 85 F. For fires involving this material, do not enter any enclosed or confined fire space without proper protective equipment. This may include self-contained breathing apparatus to protect against t~'e hazardous effects of normal products of combustion or oxygen deficiency. Read the ,entire document. COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Normal combustion forms carbon dioxide and water vapor; incomplete combustion can produce carbon monoxide. ~'6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES CRk'%iTREC E~iERGENC~ NUMBER (2i hr): (800)42%-9300 or-(202)483-7616 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES: Eliminate all sources of ignition in vicinity of spill or released vapor. Clean up small spills using appropriate techniques such as sorbent materials or pumping. Where feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Follow prescribed procedures for reporting and responding to larger releases. This material is considered to be a water pollutant and releases of this product should be prevented from contaminating soil and water and from entering drainage and sewer systems. U.S.A. regulations require reporting 'spills of this material that could reach any surface waters. The toll free number for the U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center is (800) 424-8802. 7. ttANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING AND STORAGE: DO NOT USE OR STORE near flame, sparks or hot surfaces. USE ONLY 1N WELL VENTILATED AREA. Keep container closed. Revision Numberi 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable '.DIES£~ FUEL NO. 2 Page 5 of 8 DO NOT weld, heat or drill container. Replace cap or bung. Emptied container still contains hazardous or explosive vapor or liquid. CAUTION! Do not use pressure to empty drum or drum may rupture with explosive force. WARNING! Not for use as portable heater or appliance fuel. Toxic fumes may accumulate and cause death. 8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT ~YEFFACE PROTECTION: No special eye protection is usually necessary. SKIN PROTECTION: Avoid contact with skin or clothing. Skin contact should be minimized by wearing protective clothing including gloves. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: No special respiratory protection is normally required. ~ However, if operating conditions create high airborne concentrations, the use of an approved respirator is recommended. -ENGINEERING CONTROLS: ~se this material only in well ventilated areas. 9. PHYSICAL AND C~MICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: Pale yellow liquid. pH: NDA VAPOR PRESSURE: 0.04 PSIA @ 40C VAPOR DENSITY (AIR=l): NDA BOILING POINT: 176 - 370C (348-698F) FREEZING POINT: NDA MELTING POINT: NA SOLUBILITY: Soluble in hydrocarbon solvents; insoluble in water. SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 0.84 @ 15.6/15.6C (Typical) DENSITY: NDA VISCOSITY: 1.9 cst @ 40C (Min.) 10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: NDA. CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable. CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Revision Number~14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 Page 6 of.'8 No data available. INCOHP~TIBILIT¥ ~ITH OTHER MATERIALS: May react with strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates, nitrates, peroxides, etc. '$~" HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Polymerization will not occur. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION EYE EFFECTS: Minimal effects clearing in less than 24 hours. SKIN EFFECTS: Moderate irritation at 72 hours. (Moderate erythema). ACUTE ORAL EFFECTS: The oral LD§0 in rats is > 5 mi/kg. ACUTE IN~{ALATION EFFECTS: ~he 4-hour inhalation LCS0 in rats is greater than 5 mg/1. ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORHATION: The data above is obtained from studies sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute (API). Whole diesel engine exhaust was reviewed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in their Monograph 46 (1989). Evidence for causing cancer was considered sufficient in animals and limited in humans. IARC placed diesel exhaust in category 2A, considering it probably carcinogenic to humans. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recon~aended that whole diesel exhaust be regarded as potentially causing cancer. This recommendation was based on test results showing increased iung cancer in laboratory animals exposed to whole diesel exhaust. The excess risk of cancer for people exposed to diesel eXhauSt has not been' determined as studies on exposed workers have been inconclusive. It is recommended that exposure to diesel exhaust be minimized to reduce the potential cancer risk. 12. ECOLOGICAL IIqFORMATION ECOTOXICITY: No data.available. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE: No data available. 13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS: Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable Page 7 of 8 Place contaminated materials in disposable containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations. Contact local environmental or health authorities for approved disposal of this material. li. TRANSPORT INFORMATION The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or appropriate Dangerous Goods Regulations, for additional description requirements (e.g., technical name) and mode-specific or quantity:specific shipping requirements. DOT SHIPPING NAME: GAS OIL DOT HAZARD CLASS: COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID DOT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN1202 DOT PACKING GROUP: III 15. REGULATORY INFORMATION SARA 311 CATEGORIES: 1. Immediate (Acute) Health Effects: YES 2. Delayed (Chronic) Health Effects: YES 3. Fire ~azard: YES 4. Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: N© 5. Reactivity Hazard: NO REGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED: 01=SARA 313 ll=NJ RTK 21~TSCA Sect 4(e) 02=MASS RTK 12=CERCLA302.4 22=TSCASect 5(a)(e)(f) 03~NTP Carcinogen 13=MN RTK 23=TSCA Sect 6 04=CA Prop 65-Carcin 14=ACGIH TWA 24=TSCA Sect 12(b) 05=CA Prop 65-Repro Tox 15=ACGIH STEL 25=TSCA Sect 8(a) 06=IARC Group 1 16=ACGIH Calc TLV 26=TSCA Sect 8(d) 07=IARC Group 2A 17=OSHA TWA 28=Canadian WIiMIS 08=IAR~ Group 2B 18=OSHA STEL 29=OSHA CEILING 09~SARA 302/304 19=Chevron TWA 30=Chevron STEL 10=PA RTK 20=EPA Carcinogen The following components of this material are found on the regulatory lists indicated. KEROSINE is found on lists: 02,10,11, 16. OTHER INFORMATION NFPA RATINGS: Health O; Flammability 2; Reactivity O; (Least-O, Slight-l, Moderate-2, High-3, Extreme-4). These values are Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 Page 8 of.'8 obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations prepared by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association (for HMIS ratings). REVISION STATEHENT: , This revision updates Section 1 (Product Identification) and revises the MSDS to comply with the ANSI Z400.1 Standard. The above information is based on the data of vhich ye are avare and is believed to be correct as of the date hereof. Since this information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and vith vhich ye may be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent to the date hereof may suggest modification of the information, we do not assume any responsibil- ity for the results of its use. This information is furnished upon condition that the person receiving it shall make his osn determination of the suitability of the material for his particular purpose. Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable ~;ft 'enueaV.mlseqo q~no$ 000£ ..... rite riSe~ Bakersfield, CA 93304 ¢05) 834-3~39 CA Lic #742735-A TANK PIPING KEYING LEGEND MANUFACTURER PART # A. 36" W/T Traffic Box ~i~Ja ~! '~ ~Z ~ ~" C. W~ b~ fi~s /~ ' ~ D. E~ctor ~y ~ ~ E. Fi~pi~ ~, ~, ~/'~ F. 1" rigid AC ~Mt ~ ~ ~ ~'~¢ d G. Cla~ Ij~cfi~ ~x t ~ H. EYS~ It I. I' fi~d ~ ~nduit ~ L. ~p m~ ~t ~1~ ff ~. ~ motor [~, ~C~e ~ N, T~b~e h~d i / R, T C Enmflex ~n~ pip~8 I '' '' I S f ~ 0 .... . . PRIMARY TANK TO BEWRAPPEDWlTH A IO MiL I ,,~ ,, ~ ~,'/ 1 · + .... ~ .... ~ ~ ~ . ~,, , ,?/ I Ii I ~ ~ N'. .'/i i .....r .............. ~ ................. t .................. i- ........ i .... ~i /~~~_/ I i~' f ~ ~ Sl~E WEW ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ d. '~' ,s ' ~ 6' CONCRE~ SPACE A~ ~OUND INNER TANK " ' ~ 7' fi" : "- ' ~i: SECTION A-A BASE PLATE DETAIL TYP. 6 PLCS. BASE PLATE DETAIL BAKERSFIELD TANK COMPANY ENV1RO=VAULT 10,000 GALLON Earthquake Design per UBC 1994 i' Customer: : Date: Design Condition Inner tank Diameter: dia in :: 8.11 Outer tank Diameter: dia ot :-- dia in + I. ft dia ot = 9 '11 Inner tank length: lengin :-- 26.6667-ft Outer tank length: leng ot :: lengin + 1.11 leng ot =27.67.11 Inner shell thick.: thkis := 0.25.in Outer shell thick.: thkos :-- 0.25.in thkih :: 0.25-in thkoh .:= 0.25.in Inner head thick.: Outer head thick.: ' Saddle Length' sad L = 7.79 ,tt Saddle Width: sad w :-- 2.tt Capacity of inner tank: cap g = 1-104 'gal Type of concrete: type :: light Specific gravity of contents: sp :: 0.88 Weight of contents: Wtcont := 8.33. l-~b,.sp, cap =7.35'104 'lb gad g wt cont Weight of concrete fill: wt cone :: type. vol c wt cone = 2.31.104 'lb Weight of steel tank: wt steel :: weight in · weight ot wt steel = 1.72-104 -lb Shipping weight of tank: wt ship :: wt cone + wt steel + wt sad wt ship = 4.58.104 -lb Total dead weight of tank: wt dead := wt cont* wt ship wt dead = 1.19' 105 'lb Seismic Design Information Height of saddle: sad := 0.333.ft Importance factor: I :: 1.25 Seismic zone Z := 0.4 Numerical coeff.: C :: 2.75 Numerical coeff.: R w :: 4 Concrete design: fc :: 2500.psi Minimum Design Base Shear Z.I.C Z-I.C -0.34 V :-- .wt dead V =4.1'104 'lb Rw Rw · Seismic force will govern C-28 Page 1 of 5 ' BAKERSFIELD TANK COMPANY Enviro=vault 10,000 gallon Earthquake Design her UBC 1994 Number of Bolts to resist shear Number of bolts: num :: 12 Load per bolt: fv :: ~V fv = 3.42-103 .lb nunl Minimum embedment 5" Concrete to be minimum of 2500 psi Minimum edge distance 7 1/2" minimum spacing 9". Bolt size: bolt 0,75.in Load allowable: F := 4275-4.1b F v = 5.7.103 -lb v 3 Fv larger than fy, bolt size okay. Use l 2 - 3/4'" bolts grade A-307 or better Check for overmrnlne Length of saddle under tank: sad L = 7.79 -t~ Overturning moment: moment ot TM ot + sad · V moment ot = 1.98' 105 'lb-ft sad L.wt Resisting moment: moment res :: 0.85. dead moment res = 3.95' 105 .lb. ft Tank is stable no overturning : 2 These calculations refer to seismic stability of tank only Foundation Footing Dimensions Width of pad: padw :: 8-fi Length of pad: pad 1 := 17-fi Depth of pad: pad d := 1.5.fi lb ' :: 150--- weight p = 3.06' 104 'lb Weight of concrete footing (one end) weight p pad w'pad l'pad d' fi3 Check for lateral slldin~ Allowable resistance ' resist all := 130-psf Area at bottom of footing ' bot a :: pad w.pad 1 bot a = 136'fi2 4 Sliding resistance ' slide f := resist all' bot a'~ slide r = 2.36.104 -lb 1.5.wt dead = 1.79' 105 'lb V Sliding force ' slide f:: ~- slide f = 2.05' 104 'lb slide r>slide f OK slide r< 1.5-wt dead OK C-29 Page 2 of 5 BAKERSFIELD TANK cOMpANY Enviro--vault 10~000 gallon Earthquake Design per UBC 1994 Check Soil Bearing Pressure · Concrete Strength: fc .--.:2.5;103 -psi ....... Allowable-Soil Pressure: soil alV:=--1000· 1.3.psf - · soil-~,ll-=-l~3't03---'psf - Class of Soil = (class 5) wt dead sup load = 5.96' 104 -lb Number of supports: N := 2 Load per support: sup load :: 2 Total weight of tank and foundation: W total TM wt dead + weight p. 2 W total = 1.8.105 .lb Overtuming moment at base of foundation: mom fd := + sad + pad d ,V ' m°_m fd = 2.6.105 qb. fi mom fd pad 1 Eccentricity of vertical load: e '- -- e = 1.44 .fl -2.83 -fl e is less than pi/6 OK W total 6 Foundation dimensions for soil check: Distance from outside edge of pad to saddle: pad I - sad L L f := pad 1 B f := pad w dist .- dist =4.6 -fl 2 W Soil Pressure ql, q2, CB ' R .- total[ R = 9.02.104 -lb 2 ql:- LfBf LfBf q2- ql ) q3 :: q2- ]~-f- dist q3 =818-psf q2<soil all OK Moment at cross section x-x: /150-1b.padd/ q - (q -l.fl =-7.57-fl-kips Mx'x:= / fi3 J 31 2 2-q3J'~-'~ Mx.x C-30 Page 3 of 5 BAKERSFIELD TANK cOMPANY Enviro--vault 10,000 gallon Earthquake Design per UBC 1994 Check Shear Area on Sup_Dod Feet Support feet dimensions: sad L = 93.53 -in sad w = 24 .in Shear line length si 1 := sad L + 6-in sl w := sad w + 6-in line I := 2.sl I + 2.sl w line 1 =259.06 .in sup load shear 1 = 19.97 -psi Shear Area: shear a := sl l. sl w shear a = 20.74 .fi2 Shear load: shear 1 '- shear a Shear Allow. : shearal1 :-- 1.1. fc~-psi-~ shearal1 =73.33'psi OK := . +2-slw. -in Ix =3.13-105 -in Moment of line I x 12 ~- I x ' sup load Sxofline S := -- Sx =6.29'103 'in3 shear -- shear =230.21 / moment ot shear = 1.19'106 'lb-in Shear load at line from moment shear mo :-- 2 mo shear mo' in lb shear line :- ' shear line = 189.08 --- S x in lb Total P/A +M/S total := shear + shear line total = 419.3 in Shear area on 1" strip: shear a :-- 1.in. 18.in shear a = 18 .in2 total, in Shear stress (max) shear stress :- shear shear stress = 23.29 .psi allowable shear all = 73.33 .psi OK '- a ~ C-31 Page 4 of 5 BAKERSFIELD TANK COMPANY Enviro---vault 10,000 I~allon Earthquake Design per UBC 1994 ~: i. Check rebar size Width: wid :: 12-in Height: high := 18.in Bar size: bs := 0.625-in Steel: A615 GR 60 Amount of cover at bottom of footing: cover := 4.in fy := 60000.psi Distance from top to center of rebar: d := high - (cover + -~) d =l.14.ft ~;.bs2-2 A =0.61 -in2 OK A st := wid-high. 0.002_ A st =0.43 .in2 A av := 4 av Moment: IMx.xl=7.57'ft-kips Area of Tension Rebar: A := -~.bs2 A =0.307'in2 4 p := --- p =0.00187 [~ 1 :: 0.85 to :: p. to =0.045 c :: 1.18. .d d.wid c -0'062d ~ -. J n :0.974 ~ :: 0.9 fY'J n'ft'kips¢ a =4.38'ft'kips K :-- ¢-fe. t0.j Kn =98.2'psi a n 12.in. 1000-lb - n . 3 n n In 1_.4 As:: d'an A s =0.177'in2 As<A OK C-32 _ Page 5 of 5 &RSFIELD FIRE DEPARTM~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES · 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301 (80§) 326-3979 TANK REMOVAL INSPECTION FORM FACILITY ~FC-~ ~Otte C~,¢le~ ADDRESS ~2.~I( ~_~C_%~3 em O~R ~ ~ PE~IT TO OPE~TE9 CO~CTOR ~ ~- CO,ACT PERSON ~o~ ~O~TORY ~ ~ OF S~PLES ~ TEST METHODOLOGY ~. ~,~ ~ ~ PRELI~ARY ASSESSME~ CO. ~ CO,ACT PERSON CO~ RECIEPT ~ ~ LEL% ~ O~% PLOT P~ CONDITION OF TANKS CONDITION OF PIPING CONDITION OF SOIL ~mT, o~t6 OATE INSPECTOR8 NAIIE SIGNATURE F~°~Ec~N^''ER.~LL~ ,v SAMPLE NUMBI:R PLACE COLLECTED, FIELD INFO: PRESERVATIVE ADDED? [~YES [~NO 2820 Pegasus Dr., Suite l Bakersfield, CA 93308 (8051 391-0517 State of Californio--EnvironmentaJ Protection Agency Form Approved OMB No. 2050-0039 (Expires 9-30-99) See Instructions on bac.~page 6. Department of Toxic Substances Control Please print or type. Form designed for use on elite (12 Sacramento, California 1. Generator's US EPA ID No. Manifest Document. No. 2. Page .!. Information in the shaded areas ~ UNIFORM HAZARDOUS .~" ,., is not required by Federal law. WASTE MANIFEST /~ ,~ ", ' · / " ~..,-~nerator'~.Name and MQiling Address ,/ ~6C~:-~Jal~',~M~i[esl:l~e~t.l~lumJ~,~,,~-;~?~c~,b~,~,~>"~;',]~ ~ .... ~~1.(~:~ ~/_.'1 .b.;:,:,,'.~,::::..':.,::,.::, -, ~ ~ ~. ~esigna~d Faciti~ Nameand Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number y' ~ -~,,. ~,~ m ~: ,-~,(',. ~:r~:'. ~',.'.: ", ;; ~ ;'..~ $;~'~.~, ~'~:' ;~"':-' : U/DOT 12. Containers 13, Total 14. Unit ;'..~"~ 1. Description Uncluding Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class, and ID Numberl No. Type Quant~ Wt/Vol t,~e:N~'E':"~ E :4.~;:'m)~,..? ~;.. ~: ' :: II I IIII :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: R I I I I I I I "'::'"':' ................ 15~ Special Handli~u~nd Additional Inform~[o~ ~ ' / , ,. ~ ' , , ~ 16. GENE~TOR'S CERTIFICATION: marked, and labeled, and are in all respects in proper condition for transportby highway according to appficable igfernational and nationa/government regulations. I~ I am a large quanti~ generator, I certi~ that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxici~ of waste generated Jo the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that I~ave seJect~ the p(acticabJe method oJ treatment, storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to and the environment; OR, if I am a small quanfi~ generator, I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and seled the best waste management method that is available to me and that I can afford. ~Ty~ ~ J Signa~/", //~". X~ Month Day Year " I I I I I J 7. Transporter 1 Ack~wl~d~mem ~ R~c~ipf of Material~ ~ ~ ~ Printed/Typed Nome Signature . . Month . Day Year E · 19. Discrepancy Indication Space F A C I L ' I 20. Facili~ ~ner or Operator Certification o[ receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name . Signature · Month Day Year g~uo: GE~[R~IOR S~DS IHIS COPY 10 ~1$C ~ISC 8022~ ~/~7} ~ 8700~22 1o: P.O. Bo~ ~00, Socr~m~nto~ C~ 95512-0400 permit to Operate Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste Unified Permit CONDITIONS OF PERMIT ON REVERSE SIDE ~ .... ,~.~.~,~. This permit is issued for the followin.: ' Materials Plan ~¢[' ~ ~'b?TM''~ :~,~ ~, i~ ~,'~?.;; ~,*" :...." .,.,?.,. /., '~' ?' ?¢';~,' ........ ',~ ,:~.. ~ ~ ~;~' "~;~,~;;~aeeround Storage of H~rdous Mate~als Waste LOCATION 2111 BRICYN *::'. ',. ~".""~ TAN H~RDOUS SUBSTANCE CAPA~I~ '} GAL C'-T~Y:2~t~{ ~,~ ~~..~ ~ANK~C~:"/~ TANK PIPING PIPING PIPING PI ~:..;::?~ "'" ~],, ~f~;ii~ ~~[ ~0~'::~ ONITOR TYPE TYPE METHOD O ~......~ ., I~ by: ~ ~~ ~ B~field Fke D~ment Appmv~ by: ~ ~ ' 1715 Chewer Av~., 3rd Flor B~el~ CA 9~01 ~o~. r~o~,~,. December 22,_1998 F~ (805) 32~576 Exp~tion Date: . _~._ [BY:_ Bulk Commodities, Inc. RO. DrawerA ~ Adelanto~ CA 92301 Telephone (760) 246-6077 January 27, 1998 Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator Environmental Services Bakersfield Fire Department 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Re: 2111 Brycin Lane in Bakersfield Dear Mr. Huey, I received your letter dated December 18, 1997 regarding the subject location. I am pleased to inform you it is our intent to have the underground tank at this location removed and installation of a new above ground tank completed prior to the December 22, 1998 deadline. I apologize on Denny Watt's behalf for not having met the initial self imposed deadline. Occasionally things do not proceed as planned. However, I did attend the November 2, 1997 workshop you provided. It was very informative. Our current schedule for completion of this project is to have bids returned by March 13, 1998, award the contract by March 27, 1998 and have construction completed by the end of July. ' Please contact me at (800) 767-3401 should you have any questions regarding our revised plan. Sincerely, _ /Td Environmental Compliance Manager BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT January 27, 1998 Denny Wyatt P.O. Box Drawer A FI~ CHIEF MICHAEL R. KELLY Adelanto, CA 92301 ADMIN~Vg $1:RVICE$ RE: 211 1 Bricyn Lane in Bakersfield, CA 2101 'H' Street BakerieS, CA 93~01 (805) 326-3941 FAX(805) 39~13~9 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UPDATE ~P~,O..W,CF~ Dear Mr. Wyatt: 2101 'H' Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3941 lAX (805)395-1349 The City of Bakersfield wishes to congratulate those tank owners who have upgraded, removed or replaced their tanks in the month of January. During ~nno. S~V,CES the month of January, our office had six sites (14 tanks) which are now in 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA93301 compliance. This is a very big "first step". (805) 326-3951 FAX (8051326-0576 For those who have not yet upgraded, I would like to share some thoughts ENVlRONMENTALSERVlCES on why it is so important to act right away: 1715 Chester Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 ]. Licensed contractors are booking up fast, in some cases, up FAX (8O5) 326-0576 to three months in advance. ~N~.~ ~)~V~ON 2. Supplies (pumps, dispensers, leak detection equipment) 5642 Victor Street may be scarce. Bakersfield, CA 93308 (805) 399-4697 3. The cost for upgrading or removing could go up as demand lAX (805) 399-S763 increases. 4. Assembly Bill 1491 will ban fuel deliveries after January 1999 to non-upgraded owners. The good news, is there is still time!!! If there is anything this office can do to assist you in your planning, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator Office of Environmental Services cc: Kirk Blair, Assistant Chief 03/13/97 09:40 ~'805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV P001 CITY OF Bt~ERSFIELD OFFICE OF E~ONME~AL' SER~CES ~ERGRO~ STOOGE T~K PROG~M 1715 Che~ter FAC~ITY A~ex Bulk Seora~e ~D~SS 2111 Bricyn Lane. Baker~fi~ld~ CA PE~ TO OPE~ ~ OPE~TO~S N~ Apex, Inc. O~RS N~~ex, Inc. ~5R OF T~S IO BE ~STED. 1 IS P~G ~G TO BE ~S~D Yes T~ ~ VOL~ CO~~S 1 12K TANK TESTING COMPANY Confidenc_e U~T _Serv_ice.s_z__I]~¢.... MAfLINGADDRESS 417 Montclair Street, Bakersfield~ CA 93309 NAME & PHONqE NUMBER OF CONTACT PERSON Chery=l__A. Young; 634-9501 TEST METHOD AES System',: II Overfill NAME OF TESTER Doug'las M. young CERT~ICATION # 86116 ' DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED 1/13/98 at 8:00 a.m. ~nvoio~ ~ddress~ T~nN Loo~tion~ WoO~: 2889 APEX, INC~ APEX, INC~ ~oD. Numb~r~ N/A P.O. DRAWER A 2ill BRICYN LANE Teohn~cian~D. YOUNG ADELANTO~ CA 92301 BAKERSFIELD, CA Teoh~O~86116 Van~O1 Dates 01-13-98 Ti~ Bt~rta 06:00 ~nd~ 08:15 Gounty~ KE Facility PhonmQ~ (805) 323-7195 Groundwater D~pth~ 144"+ ~lue P~in%s~ N/A Contact: KARA OR OSCAR Dat~Ti~o syst~ ~as ~illed~ 6+ HOURS t 12000 DIESEL PASS pASS PASS N/A G. 00" TURB. SWS 4 6 Additional ~nfo~ma~ton~ TEST TECHNICIAN~ DOUG YOUNG O~T~T.L~ ~99-1076 THE MECHANICAL LINE LEAK DETECTOR WAS TESTED AND IS OPERATIONAL~ BITE LOB TIME S~t Up ~quip~ 06:00 Bl~d PY'odu~t Llnes~ YES Bl~d Vapor Lines~ N/A Bl~d V~nt lin~s: YES Bl~d Tupbine~ YES Bl~d ~uctio~ Pu~p~ N/A Rtsors l~st~ll~d~ YES a) This syscom mnd.~othod m~ts ow ex~mds the orit~ria in UB~PA 40CFR pa~t '~80~ NFPA ~-87 and all applicabl~ state and local codes~ b) Any failure listed above may require further action, check with all regulatory agencies~ Copy~'lgh~ (~) 1~8~ by ~E~ ln~o A~S/Bys~m I1Pr~c~i~io~ l~a~ T~ ~raph (OverFill) ~voi~ No~ ~ 2689 ~ 01/13/98 Ttm~ ~ 06:02~5~ T~h~i~i~ DMY T~k~ 1 T~nk ~t~~(i~)~ Vo~u~(~al)~ 12000 ~rade 'Level(in>~ 134 Pwodu~ L~v~l(ln)a 96 W~ Loyal On Tank(in)~ 0.0 Sp'eot~ic Gravity~ ~85 Oo~'ioi~n~ O~ ~xpmnmton~ 0~0004633 Oalibra~to~ Vaiuo(~l>~ 200 Oha~nol~ 1 Lov~l Se~n~ Fro~ 1 To 300 T~p B~e~ F~o~ 1 To 300 ~ang~ In Oaiibra~ion ~on~ ~ 64 ~altbwa~ion Uni~(gal/uoi~) = 0,00082 ~ur~a~ A~oa(~ in) ~ 16~8 T~p~ ~han~(F/h> .~ 0~007 L~vel volu~(~ph)~ 0~00 T~p~ vol~o(~-ph) ~ 0.03 P~odu~ Ltn~(gph) ~ .-.0,002 N~t ~hange (gPh) ~ -0, 03 Copyright (c> 1989 by AES, Inc, APEX, INC, , 2111 BRICYN LANE , BAKERSFIELD, CA~ THIS IS A IRIGH LEVEL TEST WITH A 200 ML. CALIBRATION ADDED PRIOR TO THESE DATA~. TEE;T PRODUCT START END I ~TART END TEST VOL° NO. TIME TIMIS I VOl_. (ML) VOl_. (ML) DIFF. (ML). I I' it I I I I ~ T .....~ I I I I I I I I I I ,' ~, I Divide the volume diffepential by the tes~ ti~te ( 15 minutes) aod multiply by ~0158311~ 'which will convert the volume differential f. ro~. ~illilit~rs per minute to gallons pep hour-. The conversion constant is found by ~ (6t~ ~i~/hr)/(3790 mi/gal) = O. 0~aSall (~i~/h~') (gal/ml) The conversion constant causes the milliliters a~d ~ir~u'bes to cancel o cvb'. Ex. if the level d?opped $ml in !5 ~inutes then: I ~ 3/15 ~l~/mino X 0.01583~1 (ii]in/hr) (gal/mi) = 0.0~ gal/by-. R~ZSULTS OF THIS WORK SHEET TO BE COMPILED ON RESUL. TS'SHEET~ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT December 18, 1997 Denny Wyatt P.O. Box Drawer A Adelanto, CA 92301 FIRE CHIEF MICHAEL R. KELLY RE: 21 1 1 Bricyn Lane in Bakersfield AOMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H* Skeet Bakersfield, CA 93301 Dear Mr. Wyatt: (80,5) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Last summer, you answered a survey concerning your underground storage tank, SUPPRESSION SERVICES stating that your tank would be removed, replaced, or upgraded by December 22, 1997 2101 'H' Street ...... YOU did not meet that target date! In November, we invited you to a free Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3941 underground storage tank workshop, where State representatives discussed both the FAX (805) 395-1349 regulations and alternatives that you as a tank owner will have. - ..... You did not PREVENllON SERVICES attend! ...... We are concerned! 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 (80~)326.3951 You will be receiving this letter on our about December 22, 1997. One year from FAX (805) 326-0576 today, December 22, 1998, your current underground storage tank will become illegal to ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE$ operate. Current laws and code requirements would require that if your tanks are not 1715 Chester Ave. removed, replaced, upgraded by that date, your permit to operate would be revoked, - - it Bakersfield, CA 93301 will be illegal for any fuel distributor to deliver fuel to your tank, - - and your tank would (805) 326.3979 FAX (805)326-0576 then be considered illegally abandoned and require that action be taken within ninety (90) days to remove the tank. -. ~.AINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Street Bakersfield, CA93308 Of course, we have no interest in pursuing this route. We would like to have your (805) 399-4697 FAX (805)399-5763 tanks properly handled prior to this December 22,1998 deadline. Please review your situation and reply within two weeks as to the current (realistic) plans for your existing tank. As we get closer to the December 22, 1998 deadline, I would expect construction costs, as well as lead times to increase considerably. If there is anything this office can do to assist you in your planning, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator REH/dm cc: Kirk Blair, Assistant Chief 03/13/97 09:40 25'805 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT Dim' ~001 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM 1715 Chester Ave., Bakersfield, CA (805) 326'13979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TANK TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY Apex_Bulk Storaqe. ADDRESS 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, CA PERMIT TO OPERATE # OPERATORS NAME Apex, Inc. OWNERS NAMEAp_ex, Inc. ~£R OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 1 IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED Yes TANK # VOLUME CONTENTS 1 12K Diesel TANK TESTING COMPANY Confiden~ UST Servi~es_~_ Inc... MAILrNGADDRESS 417 Montclair S~reet, Bakersfield, CA 93309 NAME & PHONE NUMBER OF CONTACT PERSON Cheryl a. Younq; 634-9501 TESTMETHOD AES System','. II Overfill NAME OF TESIER Douglas M..Young CERT~ICATION # 86116 ' DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED 1/13/98 at 8:00 a.m. .APEX, INCo APEX~ INC. ~°~o Nu~b~, N/A P.O. DRAWER A 2111BRICYN LANE Toeh~'otan0D. YOUNG ADELANO, CA 92301 BAKERSFIEL. D~ CA T~h.~86116 VaoQ~O1 Da~ 01-09-97 Tt~o ~ar%~ 12~45 ~ndo 15~00 Ooun~y~ KE Facility Pho~o~ (805) 323-7195 Orou~d~a~r D~p~h~ 144"+ Blu~ P~l~ts~ N/A Co~a~ DIANE DalmaTia® ~y~ w~s ~illod~ 6+ HOURS ~ 12000 DIESEL PASS PAss PASS N/A 0, 00" TURB. SWS 4 Additio~al Zn~orraation~ TEST TECWNICIAN~ DOUG YOUNG O.T.T.L. ~1076 THE MECHANICAL LINE LEAK DETECTOR WAS TESTED AND IS OPERATIONAL~ S~TE LO0 TIME 8~t Up ~quip~ 12~45 ~l~d Vapor Li~e~ N/A, ~l~d Tupb~n~ YES ~led Suction Pu~p~ N/A _ Ri~ps ~n~all~ YES paw~ ~80~ NFP~ ~9-87 and all appli~abl~ s%a%~ and lo~al oodoso b) Any failuro lts~od abov~ may ~equt~ fur%he~ action~ che~k wi'~h all regulatory agencies~ Copyright <~) 1989 by AEG, Inc. 24i8 ~oQo~ 01/09/97 ti~ ~ 12~1~8 D~Y Tank: 1 Tank Dia~ete~-<in)~ 95 12000 ~rad~ L~v~l (in) ~ 134 P~o~u~ L~v~I (in) ~ 97 On tanN (in) ~ 0 O~avi~y~.~8? .... ~o~fi~ion~ O~ ~xpanst~n~ 0~0004453. · Value(mi) ~ 200 Chann~l~ I F~o~ 1 To 225 T~mp Oog~en~ Fmom~ 1 To ,225 --CIg~dnBe ~n Calib~e~ton Zon~ ~ 79 Calib~a~ion Unt~(~ai/unf~) ~ 0=00067 ~ta~tn~ T~p~ra~ur~ (F)~ 59~188 h~ad Pr~ur~(p~l ($~))~ 3.05 Lovol volu~(~ph) B -0.01 T~p~ volu~e(gph)~ 0~01 P~oduo~ Ltn~(gph)'~ -0~003 N~ '(~h~ngo (gph) ~ -0.02 Copyright (c) 1989 bF AES~ Inc. ~c. Notes ~ APEX~ INC. ~ 2111 BRICYN LANE ~ BAKERSFIELD~ CA. THIS iS A HIGH LEVEL TEST WITH A 200 ML. CALIBRATION ADDED PRIOR TO THESE DATA. AES PI_T-t 00R HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST WORK SHEET TEST PRODUCT START END START END. TEST VOL~ NO. TIME TlivlE VOL. (ML) VOL. (filL) DIFF. (ML) I I I- I I Di~vide the volume differential by the test time ( 15 minutes) and multiply by 0~015831i~ which will convert the volume differential frot~ ~illilit.ers per ~inute to gallons per hour, The conversion constant is .found by (60 min/hr>/(~79~ mi/gal> = 0.015831t (rain/hr) (gal/mi) The conversion constant causes the' milliliters and ~inutes to cancel out. Ex~ If the level dropped 3~1 in 15 ~inutes then: 3/15 ~l~/~ino X 0~015831! (rain/hr) (gal/~l) = 0~003 gal/bY', RESULTS OF THIS WORK SHEET TO BE COi~F'ILED ON RESULTS SH~.ET, BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ZARDOUS ~TERIAL DIVISION ~ ~~~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~,~// 5 Chester Avenue (805) 326-3979 Third Floor %~-0~ APPLICATION TO PERFO~ A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY ADex Bul~ StoraGe ADDRESS 2111Bric¥~ Lane PERMIT TO OPERATE # 021961 OPERATORS NAME Kara OWNERS NAME Apex, inc. NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 1 IS PIPING GOING TO'BE TESTED Yes TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS 1 12.000 ~=s~] CONFIDENCE UST 417 Montclair Street TANK TESTING COMPANY SERVICES, INC. ADDRESS Bakersfield, CA 93309-179 TEST METHOD AES System II (Overfill) NAME OF TESTER Douglas Young CERTIFICATION %' 86-116 STATE REGISTRATION % 90-1076 -DATE &-TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED 1/9/97 ~ !AQ0 p.m. BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT December 11, 1996 ns~ c.~F Denny Wyatt MICHAEL R. KELLY P.O. Box Drawer A Adelanto, CA 92301 ADMINISTRATIVE SEI~qCES 2101 'H' Street ~kersfield, C^ 93301 (~) 3=~-3941 RE: Under, round Storage Ta~'~ located at Apex Bulk Con~nodities, 21 ! ! m {~) 39~-1~9 Bricyn La~e in B~e;s~cid C~. SUPP~E~ION SE~ICES ~ke~fiel~, ~ (~) 32~3q41 ~ <~> ~ ~ ~ ~ sum you =e a~=e, ~ ~st~; s~c ~cd steel t~s that do not mc=t the cu~em codc ~cq~ements must be removcd, r~placed o~ up~=ded to ~;N~O, =;~C;= m~et the cod~ by D~cembe; 22, ] ~8. ~our t~ does not c~enfly mce~ ~he new 1715 C~ster (~) 32~3q51 ~ <~> ~=~;~ catc~o~. Your cu~cm co~se ~H not b~ rene~ed unt~ =ppro~atc up,adc o~ you; t~ system Js ENV~N~E~AL SE~CES 1715 ~st~r ~v~. ~> ~;~ ~n o;dc; to =ss~st you ~d ~s o~cc ~ mcefin~ t~s ~s~ appro~c~ F~ (~) 32~7b ~ w~o~ s~e~t Friday, December 27, 1996. ~kets~el~, CA 933~ (~5) 3~-~97 F~ (~) If you have ~y questions conce~ng your t~ or if we c~ be of ~y assist~ce, please do not hesitate to contact t~s o~ce. Sincerely, Ralph E. Huey Hazardous Materials Coordinator Office of Environmental Services REH/dlm attachment BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION )~X~~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 Chester Avenue (805) 326-3979 APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITYAmex Bulk S~oraae ADDRESS 2111 Bricvn Lane PERMIT TO OPERATE # 021961 OPERATORS NAME Kara OWNERS NAME Apex, Inc. NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 1 IS PIPING GOING TO BE TESTED Yes TANK# VOLUME CONTENTS CONFIDENCE UST 417 Montclair Street TANK TESTINGCOMPANY SERVICES, INC. ADDRESS Bakersfield, CA 93309-179 TEST METHOD AES System II (Overfill) NAME OF TESTER Douglas Young CERTIFICATION # 86-116 STATE REGISTRATION # 90-1076 DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED 1/9/97 ~ 1:00 p.m. CONFIDENCE UST "Compliance With CoL~ence'' SERVICES, INC. CHERYL A. YOUNG Vice President 805-631-3870 417 Montclair Street 800-339-9930 Bakersfield, CA 93309 FAX 805-631-3872 ~,~ ~~ ~%~-~ ~ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ~i..~'~~',, · HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DIVISION t.--I~i:?£~ :,, ~~~ Bakersfield, CA 93301 5 Chester Avenue (805) 326-3979 Third Floor APPLICATION TO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TES PE~IT TO OrE.TS # ()~_Jq~ / T~ VOL~E CONTENTS I /~ ~ ~~ CONFIDENCE UST 417 Montclair Street TANK TESTINGCOMPANY SERVICES, INC. ADDRESS Bakersfield, CA 93309-179~ TEST METHOD AES System II (Overfill) NAME OF TESTER._~,~.~I~ ~0~3~/-.-')___/CERTIFICATION # ~b-I[ & STATE REGISTRATION# q~'f~qb Invoice Addres~ Tank Location~ . W~O~$~ 2159 APE×~ INC~ APEX~ INC~ IoD~ Nu~ber~ N/A P~O~ DRAWER A 2111 BRICYN LANE Te~hnician~D~.YOUNG ADELANO~ CA 92301 BAKERSFIELD~ CA TechniCs86116 Van~O1 D~te~ 01-02-96 Ti~e Sta~t~ 11~45 ~nd~ 14~15 County~ ~ Facility Phone~ (805> 323-7195 Groundwater Depth~ 144"+ Blue Prints: N~A Ooota~t~ KARA Date~Ti~e ~ys~ was filled~ 6+ HOURS Tank' Fill/V~m~ Product Typ~ Of Vapor lnche~ of Pump Ta~ T~nk ~paci~y Produc~ T~nk Vapor Lin~s Line R~eove~y Wat~r/T~nk Type Ma~pfal I 12000 DIESEL PASS PASS PASS N/A O~ 00" TURB~ SWS 4 Additional ~n~orn~a~ion~ TEST TECHNICIAN~ DOUG YOUNG O~T~T.L'. ~90-1076 ~ THE MECHANICAL LINE LEAK DETECTOR WAS TESTED ~ND IS OPERATIONAL~ SITE LOG TIME S~t Up Equip~ 11:50 ~led Product Lines~ YES Bled Vapor Line~ N/A Bled Vent lines~ YES\ Bled Turbine~ YES Bled Suction Pump~ N/A Risers Installed~ YES a> This ~ystmm and me'bhod momt~J or exoe~d~ the ori~rta t~ USEPA 400~R part ~80~ NFPA ~-8'~ add ~11 ~ppl~able sta'~e and lo~al b) Any ~ailuw~ li~d above ~ay r~quiwo ?u~'~h~ a~ton~ ~heoh wi~h ~],1 regular Dry ~opyri~h~ (c) 1989 by AE~ Certified Technician 8i~na~t~-~.~ a~~~~ ~.~.~__ Da~ ~ /~-~ ~nvoice No~ ~- 2159 Da~e~ 01/02/96 Time ~ 11~57~35 Te~hn~ia~ DMY T~nk~ 1 TataR Dia~e~er(in)~ 95 Voiu~e(g~l) ~ 1~000 ~rade Lev~l(i~) ~ 134 Ppodu~t Level(in) ~ 111 Wa~r Leve~ On Tank(in)~ 0 Bpocifi~ Oravt~y~ . 87 ~oo'Pfi~len~ Of ~pans~on~ 0~ 0004463 ~alibra~ion Value(~> ~ 200 ~ha~l~ i Level ~e~meo~ Rrom~ 50 To 275 Te~p ~eg~en'~ From~ 50 To 2.75 ~han~.~e In ~alibr~ion ~one ~ 46 Oa~libra~ion. UnitCgal/u~tt) = 0~00115 Ota;~tinQ Temperature (F)~ 50.215 Woad Pressure(psi (Bt~))~ 3.49 8urfaoe Area(sq~ in): 22.9 Tmmp, Change(F/h) : 0.005 L~vel volume(gph): 0,00 T~po volu~(gph)~ 0~02 Produ~'~ Llne(gph)~ -0~003 N(e~ ~hange(gph) ~ -0~02 Copy'right (c) 1989 by AES~ ** Notes ** APEX,~ INC. ~ 21~ ~. BR.ICYN LANE , BAKERSFIEL. D~ CA. THIS IS A HIGH LEVEL. TEST WITH A 200 ML. 'CALIBRATION. ~~~'~% BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ~~1-715 Chester Avenue (805) 326-3979 Third Floor CONFIDENCE UST 417 Montclair Street TANK TESTING COMPANY SERVICES, INC. ADDRESS Bakersfield, CA 93309-17 TEST METHOD AES System II (Overfill) NAME OF TESTER ,__~h'/~l]~,., ~ ~d~{ CERTIFICATION ~ ~ -( [ & STATE REGIST~TION ~ D ~/" DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CO~UCTED /~~ ~ ~~ ~~ DA~: SIG~T'~ ~ ~P~.ANT ~ ~.~ IAKIUFIILD FIRE DEPARTMENT 'BUREAU OF FIRE PRWIH?IOH · ' ~,- APPLIOA?ION .AI~!iooH~ No., uy:. .. ~ di*lOY, am~,.inl~ll, .N,-o. mN, Nil.or handle ~Nrl. ll or p~OiN, In~lving".°r C(~RRECTION ~ NOTRE , BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT i~ 02~C~ Sub Div. ~kt~t ~zpP-,r~,~ vx J~!^ Blk. . Lot. You are hereby required to make the following corrections at the above location: Cot. ~o , ,~ ..~" ,, .' Completion Date for Corrections /./J ~-./"~, ~ inspecLo~ 326-3979 UNDERGROUND STORAGE INSPECTION ............ ""* ' · ,,.../,,'Bakersfield Fire Dept. ..... Hazardous Materials Division Bakersfield, CA 93301 .~' FACILITY ADDRESS ~tl~, ?~'e'-, ~ CITY FACILITY PHONE No. '%~- 7[~5'~' INSPECTION DATE I~/~ ~/q~ TIME IN TIME OUT , INSPECTION ~PE: ROUTINE / FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS la. F~s A & B Subm~ 1 b. F~ C Su~ 1c. O~mting F~ Pa~ ld. State Surc~rge PaM le. State~nt of Fi~l R~ibil~ Su~ lf. W~en Contract E~sts ~n ~ & O~mt~ to O~e UST ~. ~lid O~mting Pe~R 2b. Ap~ov~ Wr~en Ro~ine M~E~ing Pr~ure 2c. U~ho~ Rel~ Res~n~ P~n ~. Tank Int~ T~t in Last 12 Months 3b. Pr~ur~ Piping Int~ri~ Test in ~st 12 M~ ~. Sucti~ Piping ~ghtn~s Test in Last 3 Yearn ~. Gmv~ F~ Piping ~ght~ T~t in ~ 2 Y~m ~. T~ R~u~s Subm~ Within ~ Da~ 3f. Dal~ ~s~l MonEoring of S~ Pr~ Pi~ ~. Manual Invento~ R~ncil~tion Each M~h ~. Annual Invento~ R~iliation Statem~t Subm~ ~. Metem Calibmt~ Annually 5. W~kly Manual Tank Gauging R~ds f~ S~II Tan~ 6. Month~ Statisti~l Invento~ R~nciliation R~uRs 7. Month~ A~atic Tank Gauging R~uEs 8. Ground Water ~nE~ing 9. ~ MonRoring 10. Continuous Intemt~ial MonAoHng f~ D~WalI~ Tan~ 11. M~hani~l Line L~k Det~om 12. El~ronic Li~ Leak Det~tom 13. Co~inuous Piping Mon~ofing in Sum~ 14. A~omatic Pump Shrift Ca~bil~ 15. Annual Maintenan~Calibmtion of L~k D~ Equi~t 16. Leak Det~tion Equipment and T~t Meth~s Lgt~ in L~113 Se~ 17. Wr~en R~ords Maintain~ on 18. Re~A~ Changes in U~g~Cond~ions to O~mti~R~ Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem W~hin ~ Da~ 19. Re~ Una~ho~ Relea~ W~hin 24 Houm ~. Appmv~ UST S~tem Re.irs a~ U~md~ 21. R~ds Sh~ng Cat~g Prot~ti~ Ins~ ~. S~ur~ Mon~ Wells RE-INSPECTION DATE RECEIVED INSPECTOR: INS tTION Bakersfield Fire Dept. MATERIALS HAZARDOUS · ' OFFIC. E: OF ENVIRONMENTAL SER VICES .. - 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93301 Date Completed I Z-/~ ~/5-.-~ Business Name: ~--~?~..~,~ ~'~>~ ~-- C-~ 14^ ~ Location: ~;~.t. ~ ~ .~,:cy~ Business Identification No. 215-000 1,-~"~ ~ (Top of Business Plan) Station No. ~-h.> /'")"),~"F- Shift Inspector Arrival Time: Departure Time: Inspection Time: Adequate Inadequate Adequate Inadequate Address Visable ~ [] Emergency Procedures Posted ~ [] Correct Occupancy ~ [] Containers Propedy Labled ~ [] Verification of Inventory Materials Er' [] Comments: Verification of Quantities Verification of Location El//,, [] Verification of Facility Diagram ~ [] Proper Segregation of Uatedal ~ [] Housekeeping ~ [] Fire Protection Er~ [] comments: Electrical ~ [] Comments: Verification of MSDS Availablity [~/ [] Number of Employees: UST Monitoring Program DI'/ [] Comments: Verification of Haz Mat Training Er"' [] · Permits ~ [] Comments: Spill Control ~ [] Hold Open Device ~ D Verification of Hazardous Waste EPA No. Abbatement Supplies and Procedures ~ [] Proper Waste Disposal _~,~ [] Comments: Secondary Containment E~" ,, [] Secudty ID.'"' [] Special Hazards Associated with this Facility: Violations: . _ - -;' All Items O.K []'/ ~ Business Owner/Manager PRINT NAME ~ SIG~TURE Correction Needed [] ,~_ White-Haz Mat Div. Yellow-Station Copy Pink-Business Copy " ' '~Underground Hazardous Materials Storage Facility ~ P 'EVERSE SIDE Hazardous Number Substance Ca~:~fi!{:¢%.::;?'' In'~'l~:i~6~a?.':::.. ~ :?'.?T y p e U o hil6~id~??:~':~:~?:: Type Method Monitoring Issued By: :. ;:.'.~ Bakersfield Fire Dept. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 / {805) 326-3979 CONFIDENCE UST SERVICES~ INC. 501 WORKMAN #8 Bakersfield~ CA 93307 (805) -631-3870 BILLING ORDER Invoice Number_.~:/~__~_ INVOICE ADDRESS: TANK LOCATION: Taken by: ' ' Salesman ~ Terr P.O. - Test Date: Phone: ~i7- Zq~-~62'7 Ph°ne:~'~"7/~ Test Time: EMERGENCY CQNTACT: PHONE: HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST RESULT SHEET AES PLT-100R START END TEST VOLUME PRODUCT VOLUME VOLUME PRESSURE DIFF. (GPH) PASS/FAIL CONFIRMATION TEST IF FIRST FAILED TEST P DETECTOR REMOVED & IMPACT CLOSED.~e' ~ ~e~ CONFIDENCE UST'SERVICES~ INC. 501 WORKMAN ~8 Bakersfield, CA 93307 <805)-631-3870 Date. /-/~-~--' Invoice Number AES 'PLT-100R HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST WORK SHEET TEST . PRODUCT START END START END TEST VOL. NO. TIME TIME VOLo (ML) VOL. (ML) DIFF. (ML) Divide the volume differential by the test time ( 15 minutes) and multiply by 0.0158311~ which will convert the volume differential from milliliters per minute to gallons per hour. The conversion constant is found by : (60 min/hr)/(3790 ml/gal) = 0.0158311 (min/hr) (gal/ml) The conversion constant causes the milliliters and minutes to cancel out. Ex. If the level dropped 3ml in 15 minutes then: 3/15 ml./min. X 0.0158311 (min/hr) (gal/ml) = 0.003 gal/hr. RESULTS OF THIS WORK SHEET TO BE COMPILED ON RESULTS SHEET. LEAK DETECTOR TEST DATA TEST LOCATIO : . FACIL.!TY ~A~~~ TEST DATE] PRODUCT DOES LEAK TEST ~1 I TEST ~2 RESULTS RESULTS DE]' EXIS]' ! P/L TEST YES SERIAl_ ~ I PASS PASS REG NO GA[_ ~ GAL FAIL FAIL YES ............. SERIAL. ~-f. ! PASS ............ PASS R/UL NO ....................................GAL. i ......................... GAl._ FAIL._ ................ FAIL YES SER I AL ~ I P A._,:~ PASS S/UL NO GAL ~ GAL FAIL FAIL ,-- .... ,.,,..RIAL ~,1~l¢~I F'RSg ~__ PRSS ~ YES ~ c?r= ' . .... NOTES: TEST PROCEDURE Test ~1: perfop~ fop ~0 seconds with nozzle in full open position test ~2: perform for 30 seconds after nozzle closed for 10 seconds EXAMPLE OF POSSIBLE RESULTS Test ~1 Test ~2 Results Test ~:1 Test ~'2 Ros. ults 1 Gal ~ ~ Gal Pass ~ ~ Gal 3 Gat Fail UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK MONITORING PROGRAM This monitoring program must be kept at thc UST location at all times. Thc information on this monitoring program are conditions of thc operating permit. Thc permit holder must notify (thc local agency) within 30 days of ': any changes to the monitoring procedures, unless required to obtain approval before making the change. Required by Sections 2632(d) and 2641(h) CCR. 1. If an unauthorized release occurs, how will the hazardous substance be cleaned up? Note: If released hazardous substances reach the environment, increase the fire or explosion hazard, are not cleaned up from the secondary containment within 8 hours, or deteriorate the secondary containment, then (the local agency) must be notified within 24 hours. 2. Describe the proposed methods an~ equipment to be used for removing and properly disposing of any hazardous substances. 3. Describe the location and availability of the required cleanup equipment in item 2 above. 4. Describe the maintenance schedule for the cleanup equipment. 5. List the name(s) and title(s) of the person(s) responsible for~ng any work necessar~y under the response plan: WRITTEN MONITORING PROCEDURES UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK MONITORING PROGRAM ...... This monitoring program must bc kept at thc UST location at all times. Thc information on this monitoring program arc conditions of thc operating permit. Thc permit holder must notify (thc [ocal agency) within 30 days of any changes to thc monitoring procedurcs, unless required to obtain approval before making thc change. R.f. qui~ by Sections 2632(d) and 2641(h) CC~ Facility Address ~.~// ~~./c~ ~ ~~ ~3 A. Describe\the frequency of performing the monitoring: B. What methods and equipment, identified by name and model, will be %used for perfor~ming the monitoring: ~ Piping C. Describe the location(s) where the monitoring will be perfor)%ed (facility pleat plan should be attached): D. List the name(s) and title(s) of the people responsible for performing ~the monitoring and/pr maintai i e ' E. Reporting _Format for monitqring: Tank ~ Piping , F. Describe the preventive maintenance schedule for the monitoring equipment. Note: Maintenance must be in accordance with the manufacturers' maintenance schedule but not less thaD every 12 mo~ths. / G. Describe the training necessary for the operation of UST syst~m, i~ncl~iping, and the monitoring ~qui~ment:__ FUEL INVENTORY SHEET ' : FACILITY TANK MONTHkYEAR *NOTE: 00 GALLON LOSS OR THREE (3) CONSECUTIVE )AYS OF GAIN~LOSS k~ST CALL SANDY/RANDY IT 1-800-767-3401 METER PAID INCHES INCHES REC. (+) (-) RUNNING DATE TiME READING I DIF INCHES I GALLONS DIF DELIV. I[~EFORE AFTER DELIV. DIF GAINkLOSS TOTAL BY I ' t " DATE DAILY FUEL LOG DATE INCHES METER READING MEASURED BY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 FUEL INVENTORY SHEET : TANK U MONTH\YEAR _~./(~'75/ *NOTE: 200 GALLON LOSS OR THREE (3) CONSECUTIVE DAYS OF GAIN\LOSS MUST CALL SANDY/RANDY AT 1-800-767-3401 METER PAID INCHES INCHES REC. ( + ) ( - ) RUNNING DATE ITIME READING DIF INCHES I GALLONS I DIF DELIV. BEFORE AFTER DELIV. DIF GAIN\LOSS -TOTAL ~z-J~ ~,':~ ~ ' .. , I .Y:~? I/~- ~-~ ?~ ~ i::::/: '/;/~ '~ -- -- 1~/'. I~~/~'~' ~J?/ ~s'-- //:~'~ ~,e~l I ~J~ I'~'~ I/'/ I,~/~; ~j~3~-. 1~7~~ ._.~sw~:- ~/~f~ ~z~72~ I I -~./~ I~/./~ FUEL INVENTORY SHEET ~l~,,~Z"~--~ .,~6-.,l~ ~2/~/~,.i''-' o FACILIT' a_ TANK /~ ~NOTE: 200 GALLON LOSS OR THREE (3) CONSECUTIVE rdONTHNYEAR.X 3~ ~~ ~ DAYS OF GAINNLOSS MUST CALL 5ANDY/R~NDY AT 1-800-767-3401 o H~T~R ~ ~AI~ ~hlCHES ~NCHE$ REC. ( + ) ( - ) RUNNZNG :"".. OATE ;TIME ', READING ', OIF ;I~ICHES ', GAI_LON$ : OIF :DELI'-.'. eEFORE ~FTER ',DELtV. OIF : GAINX. LOSS:._ TOTAL r.'} ,.. ~ , , ....... , , , r ..... : ..... ~ __======= ' I ~ , ,, ~Z& , ff , ,, .... ,. , ..... t 2 ,,:~ ~ad .... .?, ~ : _, m ~2/ , ', : ~', , ~--~ .......... ' ~ :~ ' ¢ ~:~' '- , ' '~Z ', ' , ..., .... -- a~ ', > ~ -- ,,/: ~ :~a , ~-- . t _Z:~ ~ .., ' ..... ~ ,- d , , ' ~' ' /~F ._: ~' ' ',/~ ', ', ..... ' ....... '~'~' _ , , , ~ ~ ._', ~ ' ' ~ ~ ,t~ , ,_ ~ .~ ~.~ , ', ': ',~' ..... -~.~.~ _,, :>~.~ ~ ~~ ..... ~ ,', ~,~~~ ,' ~.~.¢~ ~ ~ . ~' , . ~' ., ,',, _~.,~ .."~': ~',/ ~ ', __, __,_ , ,, ., , - , , · , ~.'. , , , ~/~ ,__ ¢~..~, o , , /~_~,~, -W~a 5 "~' .... ' :"-" "' '" ...... , - , -. , ,~ . ~=~.-'~ .,~' ,, ...~' /~~ / .,' /~/~,,; - ,, ~/~ , ./~/~ ', ..... ~ ,, ' ..... ,. , . .... ~ ...... , .~ . ...~ ~ , ., : , ~ ~,, <:c, /~ ', ~., .. . , ~, , , . .. ' .... ' ~ ' ..... , · ,/~ ~.. . ~,, ~~, ; ,' ,, , ~ ,,~ , ~ v 7~,~. <..~ , ~ / ~ .~ , , .......... · . , , .- ~a~ ', , ., , , ./~ , ',/'~/~-(~: ' ,:~/ ~ ~ L ~ I G ' - I " ~ ~ '.~, ~~/ ,~, .~ , . . , ~ ~ ,~ ,_~ , , , , , __, , .... , ,,, ..... , . : ] , · .... : ~~ ~,, ~4 s , ~ ,~, , , ~._ .., ,. _, , , ~ ~ , , ~.~ ',~~ , , .-- ~ ,~ ' ~ ,, ,z~/~ ,~ -, , ~ , ' ' ' , .., = qq/g ...... .~ -~ .. ,~ . . ..... : ~-~ : ~: . : ,II ........ ~1~47~ ,~ ~ ~ , ~ , .~, ~. , .......... '"' ..... '/z~//'Y~ ,'~' ,'.~~ ', /~, ,. .' ' ....' "-- ~ ~ ..I , % I __ I / _1 L I i I . , ~ ~ i ~ ...... I ~ ... , ':L~ ' FUEL IMVENTORY SHEET ¢ "~ MOMTH~.YE'AA// ~.,'~/~/..//~/'.7~~'~ *NOTE: 200 GALLON LOSS OR THREE (3) CONSECUT}VE o -'F- gAYS OF' GAINxLOS$ MUST CALL SANDY/RANDY Z u'-) METER PAIO INCHES IblCHE$ REC. ( + ) ( - ) RiJNNiNG. r:"v '~ DATE ',TIME l', REAOIN6 ', gI? ',"INCHES '~ GALLONS : DIF ',.DELl'-.;. EEFORE AFTER :OELIV. OIF GAiN',.LOSS .. TOTAL ', CONFIDENCE UST "Compliance With Confidence" January 20, 1995 Amy Green, R.E.H.S. Ha .ardous Naterials .a.age=ent Progra= KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTNENT 2700 -i~- Street, Su£te 300 Bakersfield, California 93301 Dear MS. Green: Enclosed please find a copy of "ARS - PLT-100R Hydrostatic Product Line Test Result Sheet~" including attachments thereto with regard to testing conducted January 1995, at' Apex Bulk Storage, 2111Bricyn Lane, Bakers~ield~ Cali~ornia. Yours truly, CONFIDENCE UST SERVICES, INCo By Cheryl A.o~o~ng,~Vice-President Enclosure cc (w/o enclosure): APEX, INCo P. O. Drawer A Adelanto, CA 92301 Attn: Diane 417 Montclair Street · Bakersfield, CA 93309 (805) 631-3870 or (800) 339-9930 FAX (805) 631-3872 ~ CONFIDENCE UST SERVICES, INC. 501 WORKMAN #8 Bakersfield, CA 9330? ~ (805) -631-3870 BILLING ORDER Invoice Number /~/6 INVOICE ADDRESS: TANK LOCATION: I Taken by: Co. Notified: Contact: ~1.~.~ Contact: ~R~ *est Date: ./...~/7.~¢~ : Phone Test Time: EMERGENCY CONTACT: PHONE: HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST RESULT SHEET AES · PLT-100R I START END TEST VOLUME PRODUCT I VOLUME VOLUME PRESSURE DIFF. (GPH) PASS/FAIL CONFIRMATION TEST IF FIRST FAILED I I CONFIDENCE UST SERVICES, INC. 50! WORKMAN #8 Bakersfield, CA 9330? Date /-/~-~'- Invoice Numbe~ /~/~)' AES PLT-100R HYDROSTATIC PRODUCT LINE TEST WORK SHEET TEST PRODUCT START END ~ START END TEST VOL. NO. TIME TIME ~ VOL. (ML) VOL. (ML) DIFF. (ML) I I I I Divide the volume differential by the test time ( 15 minutes) and multiply by 0.0158311, which will convert the volume differential from milliliters per minute to gallons per hour. The conversion constant is found by : (60 min/hr)/(3790 ml/gal) = 0.0158311 (min/hr) (gal/ml) The conversion constant causes the milliliters and minutes to cancel out. Ex. If the level dropped 3ml in 15 minutes then: 3/15 ml./min. X 0.0158311 (min/hr> <gal/ml) = 0.003 gal/hr. RESULTS OF THIS WORK SHEET TO BE COMPILED ON RESULTS SHEET. Invoice N'.,m b~r .... ~~ LEAK DETECTOR TEST DATA PRODUCT I DOES LEAK T=,::T f~! TEST ~2 RESULTS RESULTS I DE]' EXIST P/L TEST I -I YES ................... . SERIAl_. !+ PASS .............. PASS REG NO ....................... . ............... SAL. ................... GAL_ FA I L FA I L YES SERIAL. ~,'. r, nss pnso R/UL NO GAL. GAL. FAIl.. FAIL YES SER I AL ~ F- A,=.,:, PASS S/UL NO GAL_ GAL FAIL FAIL ...... ........................................ .................. _~_.. pnss DSL NO ...................... ~..~_ ....... GAl_ I ...... ~,..~. ...... GAl.. FAIL. _ ....... FAIL t NOTES: TEST PROCEDURE Test ~1: perform for 3~ seconds ~.~,.'.th noz:.:le in full open position test ~$2: perform for 30 seconds afte¥- Fio~zle closed for 10 seconds EXAMPLE OF POSSIBLE RESULTS Test ~1 Test ~,2 Results Test q:l Test q2 Re~.ults 1 Gal 3 Gal Pass 3 E:~i 3 Gal Fai 1 jjlORRECTION N TICE '-" "- l"i q :'~. ~ BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT · ,~:': .... ~-- You are hereby required to make the following corrections ,at.the above location: " Cot. No Completion Date for/Corrections UNDERGROUND STORAGE ' · Bak*er~field Fi're Dept. · ' .... , "\ : Bakersfield, CA 93301 FACILITY NAME .~.,t:~-,~ ~ ~On~,,-n~,;4;~-~,. BUSINESS I.D. No. 215-000 FAClLI~ADDRESS ~J~ ~;ey~ J~ ; CI~ ~ ZlPCODE FACILI~ PHONE No. ~ ' ~ I~ ~ ~ '~;,.INSPECTION DATE I~'/~ G /~/ ' ~ ~ Pr~ ~E. IN ~:20 TIME OUT ~ :O~ ~ ~ i~G Ina ~le Inst INSPEGTION ~PE: ~ V~ [1~1 , I ~ ~/ / SEe S~ ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS ~ no-~a y~ ~ Wa yes ~ Wa la. F~s A & B Subm~ lb. F~ C Su~ ./ ' " lc. O~mting F~ PaM .~ ,. ~ , ld. State Sum~rge~,Pai~ .,"'?' ~ le. State~0t o('F ~al. R~si~li~ Su~ ~' ~"~ lf. W~en~Contm~ ExiMs ~n ~er & O~ to O~te uST ~ / 2~ ~iid O~mting Pe~ff ~. Approv~ Wr~en Ro~ine Mon~oring Pr~ure / 2c. U~ho~ Relea~ Res~n~ Plan ~' ~. Tanklnt~T~tinLast12Months ~/t~ +~,'~ ~/~_ ~ ~. Pm~ur~ Piping Int~ri~ Test i~ast 12 Months 7/~_ ~/~ '4~ ~. Suction Piping ~ghtness Test in Last 3 Yearn ~. Gmv~ FI~ Piping ~ghtn~ T~ in ~st 2 Y~m ~. T~ R~u~s Subm~ Within ~ Da~ 3f. DaiN ~sual MonEoring of Su~i~ Pr~u~ Piping ~. Manual Invento~ R~cil~tion Each Month~ ~. Annual Invento~ R~iliation Statement Su~ ~. Metem Calibmt~ Annually ~ / 5. W~ Manual Tank Gauging R~ds for SmafiTan~ 6. Monthly Statisti~l ~nvento~ R~ciliation R~uEs 7. Month~ A~ti~Tank Gauging Resu~s 8. Ground Water ~n~odng .~ 9. ~r Mon~°dng 10. Continuous Intemt~ial MonAo~ing f~ Doubl~Wall~ Tan~ 11. M~hani~l Line Leak Det~om ~c~ / 12. El~tronic Line Leak Det~ 13. Continuous Piping Mon~ng In Sum~ 14. A~omatic Pump Shrift Ca~bil~ 15. Annual Maintenan~Calibmtion of Leak Det~ Equi~t / 16. Leak Det~tion Equipment and T~ Metes Li~ in LG-113 17. W~enR~ordsMaintain~onS~e ~ ~ ~'~./~d~. ~ ~ ~ ' 18. Re~A~ Changes in U~g~CondA~s to O~ti~~ Pr~ur~ of UST S~tem WAhin ~ Da~ 19. Re~A~ Una~h~ Relea~ W~hin 24 Houm ~. Approv~ UST S~tem Re.irs and U~md~ ., 21. R~rds s~ng Cath~ic Pmt~ti~ Ins~ ~ ~ ~. S~ur~ Mon~ng Wells ~ RE-INSPECTION DATE . , RECEIVED BY: INSPECTOR: FO 1~9 ate Underground Hazardous Materials Storage Facility C O N DI TI O .S~i~i'~:;~:! p~i~!~~i!~!~EV E R S E~ SIDE Tank Hazardous G~ii~?:?:::::i::~:.;.::.i;:.i:ii~: .... Y .e.:g~:~!ii}ii~iiiii.~:~::.. :ii ~'.~Tank "~::;i:.;i~:~:~?~ i':i!:i!}}?:i::: Piping Piping Piping Number Substance C ~'~;~ ~]i{~%.:.~?' In'~'{ ~li'~:~i:?:;i;.. ~ j(.:~T ype M o hit'~ifi:~?]":]'~?~;;:. Type Method Monitoring ':~:-..... ~:: .:.:: ... , .:.: r__ Issued By:~ ':::~::::'"'. ............... '"'::~.*::~:' .:~? .~::::::~:~ ======================= '::~:~:',"~; ':~:. ~::' .':*::::'~ ~ ~.: ~ ...... HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 1715 Chester Ave., 3rd Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 1805} 326-3979 gppro~,d b~: 8alph fi. Hu~, Hazardou~ Malodal~ Coordinalor Valid kom: ~ T~ Q'¢ 1o: ~c. ~'~ ~' RIGHT THUMBPRIHT (OPTIONAL) State of (-_~L~ ~0~[ ~ ~ county ofj' On ~'~J',~.5-~{L-~ before me, -..Jq:~.'~"~"~'~ L. ~--~i'"~("") , · (DATE) (NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - I.E., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC") personally appeared C ~['~c~ C [-~'. ~ ~__(-(~ i. ~ CAPACITY CLAIMED aY SIGNER(S) (NAME(S).O~ SIGN ER(S)) [] INDIVIDUAL'(S) [] CORPORATE OFFICER(S) , [] PARTNER(S) (T~TLE(S)) .,~ersonally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence [] ATTORNEY IN FACT to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are sub- [] TRUSTEE(S) scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR eeeeeeee,e,e,eee**~,eeee***e***e to me that he/she/they executed the same in [~F'OTHER: * * i~ JANE L. HANSEN ~ his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by ~ COMMISSION #1014608 his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the NOTARY PUBLI¢-CALIFORNIA::33 person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: SAN BERNARDIN0 COUNTY ..., person(s) acted, executed the instrument. (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(lES)) ~ My ComR)issio~ Expires Jan. 23, 1~98 ******************************** Witness my hand and official seal. (SEAL) (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) ATTENTION NOTARY: The information requested below is OPTIONAL. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title orType of Document ~.c~L~[ ~'[C~.~(3Q MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above C.0TTS FORM 63240--ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEOGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITY/REPRESENTATION/FINGERPRINT--Rev. 12-92 ©1992 WOLC0TTS FORMS, INC. GF::RTIFIGATION OF FINANGIAI_ RESPONSIBll_ITY FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONTAINING PETROLEUM A. I am req.ulred to demoustral~ Financial Resp~nsi'oiliD/in th.e rcqulred amount~ as spe~iGcd in Se~ion ~07. Cl~&p~r 18, Div. 3, Tide 23, ~]500,000 dollzrs per o~urrenc~ ' ~1 million dollan annual a&gr¢~atc or ~N'D or '~~urrenc~' ['~2 million doll.rs a~nt~l .g~'e,.t · 28o7. omm~ /~reby ceFt#'~S t/~t /t b/n compliance w/th the rc~/uirerr~nts o!,Section B. A____~.. ~ulk ', Inc. '~r 18, DA,bbs $, l-ttle £$, Ca///om/~ Code ol'Regu/atiot~. · ' ~ tt~henbm~ us~ to demor~t~te fir~ocb/respot~;/b///ty as r~Nr/uirc,~t by 8c~:tiom 2~OZare as !o//ow$i' State Fun~. 990,000 Note: If you are using the State Fur~ as any part of Y° ur dernor~stration of financial resporrsibility, your execution and submission of this cell~fication also ced/ties ~hat you are ir~ compliance w#h all cond/tior~ for participation in the Fund. Apex Bulk Com[modit'ies, Tnc.~ 'Bakers£ield 2111 Bric~n Lane Bakersfield, CA 9330~ 11655-East Washington Blvd. Apex .Bulk Commodities, Inc.., Whittier Whitt°ier,' CA For Apex Bulk Commodities., Inc., By: 5-25-94 Char-les Craig, Chief Financial F~OM AP BULK COMMODITIE~ T3 APE',~jLK RD.E. P.02 05/04/1994 15:07 BAKERSFIELD FIRE DEPAR'rMENT HAZARDOUS MaTERL DIV"SION PERMIT TO OPERATE ': ! ...... ' UNigERGROUND HAZARDOUS STO'RAGEFACILITY .Per,,it No.; 05)050C State ID No.: 21961 ISsued, 'o: Al:EX BULK COMMODITIES .:." ~.~/~ (~ ~-~ ~.. - ; . , '" Location: 21;.1 BtLICYN LN ',:-.;... .... . BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 : . · ',': 3 : OWner:.' DENNY WYATT ' ::,' . ADELANTO, CA 92301 ..... 'OPerator: AP:~X BULK COMMODITIES ':.: i Z111 BKI~< LN .: . , "".?:" BA]CERSFIELD~ CA 93308 ':.!:/:.: i'.: ", i"/!:' ::;' /'' ' ':" :,.' Facility Profile: :.· S1;tbstan,c¢ ~ Installed . ...... DI.-ESEL IZ,O00 GAL 1981... YES · '" This l~mit ~ granted .. ;,b~cct ~o the c.>nditio,.~ listed on thc i, ttachcd ,ummam., of ctmciitiola's ,m~ 'relay ~t' rev. t~ked for J'ailurt to :: adhe! c tu ibc stated conditions nod/or violations of any other State or F~ai ~ [! s. ij~aU~d,,D~. Ralph E. l;:uey Title: .Lta~ard4US'btat~rials Cry~rdinator · ..." POST ON PREMISES ... N ON~&NS~LE ' . /~ F 1-~' nml~il F Sta~e W~r ~u~s ~n~l Bo~ ' .~,.:~:.:F~*~>:.:~:~.~:.:~· '..~.~'~'~C'::.¥ ::..~ '~' · ~ '.~:'-t :...:,..:..'. ....... '..~:~<i~.~-" l:~:~%:~::~:~:~::~s ~?;~:~t~::~:~:~::'?:~.~ :t~O:.~::: k ::.:~.::~:~:~':.~ ;:.... ,'.'-..: · '..:...":F...'. '$".."~:::'-'."-'.:~'P:.::::.~ '.. CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNDERGROUND STOOGE TANKS CONTAINING P~OLEUM A. l mm required M demons~ ~u~al ~es~n~ai~ ~ ~ required amouu~ 3s s~cd ~ ~on ~07, ~p~r 18. Div, 3, ~dc 23. ~ ~,~ dolla~ ~r ~cn~' ' ~l minion dolla~ annual or ~D or ~0 ~T~ ~ ~ ~) .... A~le ~, C~pter 18, D~b~n 3, ~le 23, Cal~orfl~ ~e of Regulat~. . .' ~ ~nb~ ~ to de~t~te ~1 re~ibil~ ~s r~uir~ by ~t~n 2807~re as follo~:' State Fun( 990,000 ~ : Note: ff ~u are ~ing t~ ~ate Fu~ as an~ ~R or. ur de~t~t~n of ~1 res~ibil~, ~ur ex~n a~ subm~s~n of th~ ce~at~n also ced~e~ ~t ~u are in com~e ~h afl co~ for ~i~t~n in t~ Fu~. Apex Bulk Commodities, ~nc.~ 'Bake~sElel~ 2111 B~lc~n gane Bake~sEleL~, CA 933~R Apex .Bulk Commodities, Inc.., Whittier Whitt~er,' CA F~N~c _ F~ Fo~ Apex Bulk Commodities, ~nc., B~: 5-25-94 . Cha~es C~ai9, Chie~ Financial · . (1) Th~' chief ~inancial officer or the owne~ or operator ~mu.~t sign, under penalt~ of. perjury,'a .letter worded exactly as follows, except that ~he instructions in b~ackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: LETTER FROM CHIEF FINANCIAL O~FICER I am the chief financial officer for [ins~r~ business n~me, 'business address and correspondence address of the owner or operator]. ~his letter;is in support of '~ the 6~e of the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund to demonstrat~ 'financial respo~slbility for taking corrective..action ~nd/.o~ compensating third parties for .bodily. injury and pr6p~rty d~mage caused by. an unauthorized-release of petrdleum in'the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate coverage. Underground storage tanks at the following facilities .. are. assured by this letter: [insert-: the name and addregs of each facility where tanks for which financial resp'onstbility is being demonstrated ar~ located]. Ap.ex Bulk-Commodities, Inc., Bakersfield 2111'Br~icyn. Lane, Bakersfi&ld, CA 93308 1. Amount 0f annual aggregate coverage being assu~ed' by th'is letter ...... - .......... ....$10,000 2. Total tangible assets ..................... $9,646,'~52 · ..' 3. Total' li~bil'ities (if any of the amount on l'i~e 2 is included in total liabilities, :' you.~ may deduct that amo~unt ~rom this l~-ne. · and add that amount-to line 4)..'i.: ...$7,692,176 4. Tangible net wor~ (sub{r~ct line 3 from 'line~2. Line ~ mus~ be at least 10' times ~ lin 1) ' ' $ 1 954 0.76 I hereby c~rtify .that the wording 'of tht~'.'iett'er ~s " td~ntical t° the' ~ording'spe~ifted...in subsection 2.808.1 (d) (1-), Chapter 18, Division 3, Title 23 of the ' · California Code of Regulations. " i' declare under penalty of perjury that the for-egoi~g is. true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed at [insert: Place of execution] on ""' '- [insert:. date] . Adc.lento., CA' 9~301 ,....on May' 25, 1994 .... [Signature] 'For Apex bul-k Commodities,. Inc. 'By: .. [Name] Charles Cr,~i~. :. [Title] Chief Financial Offic.e'r .. .' HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 ,-~ (805) 326-3970 r~..'2~ UNDERGROUND TANK QUESTIONNAIRE JUl. 1 0 1991 I. FACILITY/SITE No. OF TANKS / J~tiS'd ............. DBA OR FAClUW NAME J NAME ~ OPERATOR ClW NAME / BOXTO INDICATE ~ CORPO~TION ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ LOCAL AGENCY DiS~IC~ ~ COUN~ AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY ~ FEDERAL AGENCY ~PE OF 8U;INE~ ~ i GAS STA;ION ~ 2 DIS;RISUTOR KERN CO~N~ PERM~ ~ EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (PEIMAE~ EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON (SECONDAR~ optional DAYS: NAME (~ST. FIRS~ ~'PHONE-N°' WITH~_~_ ~ ~AR~ CODE ~ DAYS: NAME, (~ST,~ FI~ PHONE No. WITH AR~ CODE WITH PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE NIGHTS: NAME (~ST, FIES~ PHONE No. AR~ CODE NIGHTS: NAME (~ST. FI~ II. PROPER~ OWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) CARE OF ADDRE~ IN~RMATION MAILING OR STREB ADDRESS ~ BOX ~ INDIVIDUAL ~ LOCAL AGENCY ~ STATE AGENCY CI~ NAME ~TE ZIP CODE } PHONE ~. WITH AR~ CODE III. TANKOWNER INFORMATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) NAME CARE OF ADDEE~ INFORMATION CI~ NAME STATE ZiP CODE PHONE~No. WITH OWNER'S DATE VOLUME PRODUCT IN TANK No. INSTALLED STORED SERVICE Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N DO YOU HAVE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY? Y~) TYPE .,4)~ Fill one segment ~ for each tank, unless all ~nks and piping are constructed of th~ame materials, style and )e, then only fill one segment out. please identify tanks by owner ID #. ~ ~A~{K DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS -- SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN I A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # ~ S. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) /~..~ D. TANK CAPA~IT%' ~N GALLONS: /~0 ~ II1. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B, ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ~ 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM .' ~ 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SEC~ONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER a. TANK [~ I BARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLAST[C MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STE~L ~ 9S UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] 1 RUBBER LINED [] 2 ALKYD LINING [] 3 EPOXY LINING [] 4 PHENOL~ LINING C. INTERIOR UNING [~ 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED ~. 05 UNKNOWN [] 9g OTHER IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES_ NO__ O. CORROSION []l POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING .ii r---~ 3 VIN',;L WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ,~ 95 UNKNOWN -[~ 99' OTHER.,7;,~' ~'~_~.,~t~'~'y.4.u-~,=~ IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U i SUCTION . AY~ 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL A IJ 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U I BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVlNYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL Wl COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U g GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODICPROTECTtON .~ U (~)UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~l AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIALMoNiTOR~NG [] g9 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION I [] 1 VISUAL CHECK ~ 2 INVENTORY RECONCILIATION [] 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGING [] 5 GROUNDWATER MONITORING [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 INTERSTITIAL MONITORtNG [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER I, TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # B. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE iNSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, R. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 90 OTHER B. TANK [] 1 8ARESTEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100"/o METHANOL COMPATIBLE W/FRP ' (PrimaryTank) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] . RUBBER LTNEO [] ~ AL~D L,N'"G [] ~ EPOX~ L,NING [] , P.ENOL": LIN,NG C. INTERIOR LINING. [] 5 GLASS LINING [] 6 UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION CIRCLE A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEMTYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A U I SINGLE WALL A U 2 DOUBLE WALL ~, U 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U gg OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U 1 BARESTEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)A U 4. FIBERGLASS PIPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A U 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 10~/o METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER D, LEAK DETECTION · [~ 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 INTERSTITIALMoNFFORING .~---] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION r~.~ ~ VISUAL CHECK [] ~ ~NVENTORY RECONCILIATION ~ 3 VAPOR MONITORING [] 4 AUTOMATIC TANK GAUG[NG [] 5 GROUNDWATER UONImOmNG l~ ~A~ T~,NG ~] ~ ,NTE.ST,T,ALMO.,TOR,NG [~] ,~ NONE ~ ~ ~N~NOWN [] ~ oTHE. I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALLt~S -- SPECIFY tF UNKNOWN ) A.O,.~,ER'S TANK LD., I B. MANUFACTURED BY: ~""C~ DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) . D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A, B. ANDC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOUBLE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER ' [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER B, TANK [] .1 BARE STEEL [] 2"STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEELCLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (PrimaryTa,k) [] 9 BRONZE [] 10 GALVANIZED STEEL [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] . RuB~. LINED "' [] 2 ~'~O L...O [] 3 EPOX~ ~INING [] . PHENOL~ L,.,NG C. INTERIOR [] s GLASS UN~NG [] S UNUNED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IJNING Is LiNiNG MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES ~ NO__ D. CORROSION :' [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASs REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [] 5, CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE ..... '~.~-] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCU~ A IFABOVEGROUNDOR U IFUNDERGROUND, BOTH IF APPLICABLE ~ '~-' "' '~ ! ' A. SYSTEM TYPE A ~ ,1 SUCTION ........ A I,I 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A U 99 OTHER , . B. CONSTRUCTION A, U I SINGLE WALL A IJ 2 DOUBLE WALL A U 3 LINED TRENCH A IJ 95 UNKNOWN A IJ 99 OTHER ' C. MATERIAL AND A I,I 1 BARE STEEL ¢ A IJ 2 STAINLESS STEEL A ~1 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A [J 5 ALUMINUM ,A~ U 6 CONCRETE ,-, 'A, U 7: STEEL Wl COATING A I,I 8 100% ME'PHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP PROTECTION AII 9 GALVANIZED STEEL A tJ 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION ' A U 95 UNKNOWN 'A IJ 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION [] 1 AUTOMATIC LINE LEAK DETECTOR [] 2 LINE TIGHTNESS TESTING [] 3 ImERs'riTIAL MON~'ORING [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION [] 6 TANK TESTING [] 7 ,.TERST,T,ALMON~TO.,NG [] 9, NONE [] 95 u. KNow. [] 99 OTHER I. TANK DESCRIPTION COMPLETE ALL ITEMS - SPECIFY IF UNKNOWN A. OWNER'S TANK I. D. # 8. MANUFACTURED BY: C. DATE INSTALLED (MO/DAY/YEAR) D. TANK CAPACITY IN GALLONS: III. TANK CONSTRUCTION MARK ONE ITEM ONLY IN BOXES A. B, ANOC, ANDALLTHATAPPLIESINBOXD A. TYPE OF [] 1 DOU8LE WALL [] 3 SINGLE WALL WITH EXTERIOR LINER [] 95 UNKNOWN SYSTEM [] 2 SINGLE WALL [] 4 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (VAULTED TANK) [] 99 OTHER a. TANK [] I BARE STEEL [] 2 STAINLESS STEEL [] 3 FIBERGLASS [] 4 STEEL CLAD W/FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC MATERIAL [] 5 CONCRETE [] 6 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE [] 7 ALUMINUM [] 8 100% METHANOL COMPATIBLEW/FRP (p~.~) ~--~ 9 ~RONZE [] ,0 GALVANIZED STEE~ [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER [] ~ RUBSER L,NED [] ~ ~-~O UNING [] 3 EPOX~ L,.,NG[] ~ PHENOLS: L,N,NG C. INTERIOR [] 5' GLASS LINING [] S UNLINED [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER LINING IS LINING MATERIAL COMPATIBLE WITH 100% METHANOL ? YES__ NO__ D. CORROSION [] 1 POLYETHYLENE WRAP [] 2 COATING [] 3 VINYL WRAP [] 4 FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC PROTECTION [~ 5 CATHODIC PROTECTION [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 99 OTHER IV. PIPING INFORMATION C~RCLE A tFABOVEGROUNDOR U IF UNDERGROUND. BOTH IF APPLICABLE A. SYSTEM TYPE A U 1 SUCTION A U 2 PRESSURE A U 3 GRAVITY A ~J 99 OTHER B. CONSTRUCTION A tJ 1 SINGLE WALL A IJ 2 DOUBLE WALL A IJ 3 LINED TRENCH A U 95 UNKNOWN A U 99 OTHER C. MATERIAL AND A U i BARE STEEL A U 2 STAINLESS STEEL A U 3 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)A U 4 FIBERGLASS PiPE CORROSION A U 5 ALUMINUM A IJ 6 CONCRETE A U 7 STEEL W/ COATING A U 8 100% METHANOL COMPATISLEW/FRP PROTECTION A U 9 GALVANIZED STEEL ,~ U 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION ,~ U 95 UNKNOWN .& U 99 OTHER D. LEAK DETECTION ~ ,1 AUTOMATIC LiNE LEAK DETECTOR [~ 2 LINET~GHTNESS TESTING [] 3 MONITOR~NGINTE~5¥i¥~'L [] 99 OTHER V. TANK LEAK DETECTION ~ , v,S~AL CHECK [] ~ ,NVENTOR~ RECONC,L,AT,ON [] ~ VAPORMON,TOR'NGF---) ~ AUTOMATIOTANK~UG~NG [] ~ GROUNDWAT~RMON,TOR~NG [] 6 TANK TESTING . [] 7 'NTERSTITIALMONITORING [] 91 NONE [] 95 UNKNOWN [] 09 OTHER BROCKWAY~S TANK TESTING Bakersfie].d~ CA,, I~ . . . C~A (8(')5~ 834--1146 Performed fO'F: Apex Bulk Commodities Test Locatic, n: 2111 Br~cyn Lane Bakersfibld~ CA 93308 T e s t I d e n t i f i c a t i ':, n : 1340 .- 1 Test Date : 07~.25-19'33 Start Data Ccllecti,':F~ : 08:07:28 Ending Test Period : Time Filled for Test : + 14 -F ~ ,--, k IL]I, a. t .~ ........... TANK ID. : 1340.-1 CONTEI',~]'S : DIESEL Vnlume : 11892 DJ. ameter :95 Grc, undwater : > 15 FT F'ump Type :Turbine Tank Type :1 Wall Steel Water in Tank :0 Test F'luid :DIESEL Vap,:::,r Rec:,very :None Average Ra~e ,:,f Cl"~ange &~ ba~ed c,n 244 Data I:~c,:Lnts Standard Deviation .............. 0054 Gall,z, ns - Volume change of Tank Contents Net Volume * '( 60 rain/Test Time) -. 1698 Gal. * ( 60/ 61.33 min.) = -. 16E, 1 Gph. - Volume change due to 'Femperatm..~re - Avg. Temp. ~ Volume * Coe'f. of Expn, * (~S0 min./ Test Ti. me) - 0285 Deg F * 11892 Gal * F~.00048 -~' ~i()/ 61 ~ = .- 1584 Gph Net change = Level' Vc, lume -. Tempera'bure V:lume Ba~.ed on the IFi'forrnatic, n pr,::,v~.ded arid the This TANK & SYSTEM LINES Test has .... CertifJ. ed Tester : Rc, bert Brcckman I~: '92..-1251 ._J~ ................ This Test cc, mplie~ wi'bf', U.S.EPA and NFPA requ:Lrements. Product Line Test Test Location '- Owner ( If Different Name: r~ ~'r~, ~;.uC.k: c.~.~*.,-,c,;. Name: ~'?O~. ~.o Address: ~ ~ t~-~ L.~,~.-,~. Address: (~.;',, ~'~ Contain Name: O~ u~i =5~ ~, ~ Phone Number: ( (~L~:/," Permit to Operate Number: ~oduct .~ t e..;.~. <_ Opcrat~ ~css=c ,,. ~ Test TEST Time Volume Volume Change Rate ( Gph O0 Minutes A , o,:. mi. * 1S Minutes B 7o mi. (B-A) "3'a mi. * 15 Minutes C z. 5' mi. (c-B) ~l 5~ mi. ~ ogq t/gph. g0nversion =__ml.! l§min X 0.0158311 = 6allonsPerHotre Confirmation TEST ( ifrequired ) Time Volume Volume Change Rate ( Gph I]~ Minutes A ~ ~ g mi. . is Minutes ~ '?'~ ml. (~-^) c/~/ ml. + 15 Minutes C ':?.g( mi. (c-s) ff' C- mi. : Oq$/g gph. "[his TEST was performed with the AES PLT I(]0-R Line Testing Unit. TheAES PLT 108-R has been Third Party Tested in accordance with U.S. EPA Protocol. The results of this Protocol Test ~re awi!able upon request. A FAIl, is declared if the Rate is Greater than 0.05 gph. Test Results / F TI-. Tester? ,,-- .... ~ "" ~': i'"" - /.:~4..~ / Date: The Tester cert/fies this test was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's suggested protocol. No other wamnties are expressed or implied. H ZARnOUS DIV SIO 2130 G Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301 (805) 326-3979 APPLICATIONTO PERFORM A TIGHTNESS TEST FACILITY Apex Bulk.Commodities ADDRESS 2111 Bricyn Lane PERMIT TO OPERATE # ? OPERATORS NAME Apex Bulk Commodities OWNERS NAME Same NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE TESTED 1 IS pIpING GOING TO'BE TESTED yes TANK% VOLUME CONTENTS 1 12 f 000 gallons Df ~e] TANK TESTING CoMpANY Brockway's ADDRESS 2014 S. Union Ave~, %103 TEST METHOD Ibex Precision Tank Test/AES-PLT-100R Line Test . NAME OF TESTER Robert Brockman CERTIFICATION ~ 92-1251 STATE REGISTRATION # . DATE & TIME TEST IS TO BE CONDUCTED 9/18 or ;/25 will advise prior CITY of BAKER SFIEL D "WE CARE" FIRE DEPARTMENT 2101 H STREET S. O. JOHNSON July 2, 1993 BAKERSFIELD, 93301 FIRE CHIEF · 326-3911 APEX BULK COMMODITIES 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 RE: Monitoring requirements for underground Storage tanks. Dear Business Owner: Our records reveal that no precision tank testing has been performed on the underground storage tank located at 2ill Bricyn Lane. Section 2643 2(A) of Article 4; Title 23, Div. 3, Chapter 16, CCR., requires that all underground tanks that do not utilize automated leak detection shall have a precision tank test annually. Additionally, pressurized piping shall be tested annually and non- pressurized piping shall be tested every three years. Pipeline leak detectors, and automated leak detection systems also have to be certified to be in working order on an annual basis. Please make arrangements to bring the tanks into compliance with state law. If you have any questions, please call me at (805) 326-3979. Sincerely, , t Hazardous Mater±als Coord±nator Underground ?ank :Program FILE CONTENTS; ~Construetton Permit I Date ' ~Permtt to abandonl No. 0f Tanks ..Date ~ended Permit Conditions ..... ~PermiC Application Form, / Tank She"ets', PIo~ ~{ons: ~kpplicacion to Abandon tanks(s) Date ~knnual Report Eorms '' ' si Written ContraCt Between Owner' A' Operator .... ~ inspect ion Reports ...... ~Corree~ndenCe - Received Date ~ . ~te Da te Unauthorised Release Reports A~andonment/:loeu~e Reports ~ ~ z ............... aampl ing/Lab C~pliance Check (New conetructi~ Che'ckllat) - ' ~ C~pllance Check (Ne~ Construction Checklilt) Plan Check (Ne~ Conltruction) Plan Check (Ne~ Conltruction) elan Check (Existing ~acllity) elan Chec~ (,Bxieti~ Facility) ~Peruit Application Chat,list Permit lnotracttona ,. ~Dtscarded . Tiqhtne~ ~elt Relult8 -- ' '~tt ' ' ' Da te ~aonitori~ Mall Const~uetton D~a/P~rmit~ ' ~ - ' ; ........ '--- ~Enviro~entel S nsit ity Data= Groundwater Orilltng, Boring Logs Location of Water Mells ~Statement se Underground Conduits HPlot Plan Featuring All Envi~o~entally Sensitive Data ~Photo8 ~Construction Drawings Location= sheet sho~ng da~e received and ta~l of lnspe~tl°~ time, ~tc ~?oo Fk,w,r Str,,t h. · COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTME HEALTH OFFICER ~*~ Bakersfield, California 93305 Leon M Hebertson, M.D. Te/ephone (805) 861-3638 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH "'r' I~T T '~"- 1:~. '"r' ~/ P '~'"-- 1:~.~ 'r' T P 'r~- l:~.[*,,,.~'r T.,'~ 0 5 0 0 5 0 C '1"'0 0 P 1~- RAT'~:a-: I~IDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTARCES STORAGE ~ACILITY NUMB~.R OF FAc'r L TTY: I OWNER: KERN VALLEY TANK LINES, INC. [ BROSSARD, ROBERT & NANCE 2111 BRICYN LANE I 2148 BRICYN LANE BAF~RSFIELD, CA I BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 TANK # AGE(IN YRS) SUBSTANCE CODE PRESSURIZED PIPING? I 4 MVF 1 YES NOTE: ALL INTERIM REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY MUST BE MET DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT NON--TRANSFERABLE '~ ~' ~ POST ON PREMI"SES DATE PERMIT MA]'T,lk'~: JUL 1 6 1986 · DATE PERMIT CH~CK LIST RETURNED: -- Information Sheet -- Agreement Between Owner and Operator Chapter 12 of Kern County Ordinance Code #G-3941 consists of the following two sections: Section 3912.12.01. The operator of the under- ground stora&e facility shall monitor the facility usin8 the ~echod specified on th~ permit for the facllit7. Records shall be kept ~n sufficient detail :o enable =he Permit:in8 Authority to determine thac :he operator has undertaken all moni:orinS activities required by the Per. it To Operate. Sec:ion 3912.12.02. If The operator is no: :he owner, :he owner shall provide a copy of the Permi: To Operate, enter into a ~ritten contract with the opera:or which requires :he operator :o moni:or :he tank as set forth in the permit, and provide :he opera- tot with a copy of Chapter 15. The owner shall notify fin ~r~itinS :he Permit:ins Authority of any chanse of operator. The ~perator listed in our records for the permitted facility in this packet, ts: PERMIT #050050C OPERATOR: KERN VALLEY TANK LINES, INC. 2111BRICYN LANE ..... BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 . . If the operator is different than the owner listed on the permit, provide a copy of the required written agreement to the Permitting Authority. within 30 days. An example contract is shown below. EXAMPLE Written Contracts ~, R & N Brossard , owner oe underground stora~s tanks located.ar. 2111 B~tic!~n Lane have enteCed Into this wet:ten con:Cat: wtth I~o~ HO~ Eq. ~O~.opeCato¢ to fulfill a Cequl~ement oE my pe[ml: to OpeCate, I 050050C. have p¢ovlded the upeCato¢ with a copy o[ :he peCmt: :o ~peCa:e and Chapte¢ ~5 o[ the OCdtnance. i, Iron Ho~e Eq. CQ~geracor o~ underground storage tanks ~o==t~ at 2111 B~cyn Lane h~. ~.=~d ~o~ R i N Bross~d , owne~ o~ s~=e, a copy o~ .Pe~mtt to Operate 1050050C and Chapte~ )5 o~ the O~tnance desc~tbtng etnes and pena~ttes fo~ non-compliance. [ have Eead and un~a~s:an~ my ~esponstbtA~tes un~e~ thts Pe~mtt and agree to do the -- montto~ the underground tanks as spect~ted tn the Perm:: to Operate. -- matntatn app[op~tate ~eco~ds as ~equt~ed by the Permit to --~mp~ament a~ ~epo~ttng p~ocedu~es as ~equt~ed by :he Permit to Operate. -- p~ope~ly close the underground tanks as ~equl~ed Permit Co Operate. May 27, 1987 Health Officer, County of Kern Environmental Hea~th Division 1700 Flower Stre~ Bakersfield, California 93305 RE: P~m~t #050050C 2111 Bricyn Lane Bakers find, California 93308 Gentlemen: Kern Valley Tank Lines, Inc., terminated their le~e March 31, 1987. At this time the building located at above- mentioned address is vaca~. The fuel tank h~ been pumped empty. The property is presently for sale. As the owner and since the tank is empty and the fuel system not in use, I request permission to temporarily suspend monitoring of the tank. Rob~t Brossard 2148 Bricyn Lane Bakersfield, California 93308 PERMIT CHECKLIST This checklist is provided to ensure that all necessary packet enclosures were received and that the Permittee has obtained all necessary equipment to implement the first phase of monitoring requirements. 'Please complete this form and return to g.CHO in the self-addressed envelope provided within 30 days of receipt. Check; Yes No A. The packet I received containedi 1) Cover Letter, Permit Checklist, Interim Permit, Phas~ I Interim Permit Monitoring Requirements, Information Sheet (Agreement Between Owner and Operator), Chapter 15 (KCOC #6-3941), Explanation of Substance Codes, Equipment Lists and Return Envelope. 2) Standard Inventory Control Monitoring Handbook #UT-lC. 3) The Following Forms: .a) Inventory Recording Sheet b) Inventory Recording Sheet with summary on reverse c) Trend Analysis Worksheet 4) An Action Chart (to post at facility) B. I have examined the information on my Interim Permit, Phase I Monitoring Requirements, and Information Sheet (Agreement between Owner and Operator), and find owner's name and address, facility name and address, operator's name and address, substance codes, and number of tanks to be accurately listed (if "no" is checked, note appropriate corrections on the back side of this sheet). C. I have the following required equipment (as described on page 6 of Handbook): // 1) Acceptable gauging instrument ~ 2) "Striker plate(s)" in tank(s) f/- 3) Water-fiflding paste I///D. I have read the information on the enclosed "Information Sheet" pertaining to Agreements between Owner and Operator and hereby state that the owner of this facility is the operator {if "no" is checked, attach a copy of agreement between owner and operator). E. I have enclosed a copy of Calibration Charts for all tanks at this facility (if tanks are identical, one chart will suffice; label chart(s) with corresponding tank numbers listed on permit). ~/ F. As required on Page 6 of Handbook #UT-lC, all meters at this facility have had calibration checks within the last 30 days and were calibrated by a registered device repairman ~f out of tolerance (all meter calibrations must be recorded on "Meter Calibration Check Form" found in the Appendix of Handbook). G. Standard Inventory Control Monitoring was started at this facility in accordance with procedures described in Handbook #UT-lO. Date Started ~,/--Y7 Signature of Person Completing Checklist: TANK WELDIHG ~,t ' QUALITY YOU CAN KELL. OGG 88805 321 WES~ KAl'ELLA AVENUE - ORANGE, CALIFORNIA ', }Z, ooo gM~o. g~uge CHarL - 95" ~.D. x 3~" She~ - F~t Head. ' Denotes depth of contents tn inches. :iGAL l),~notes co~xtente at that depth. GAL D GAL D ~G'A I~ D GAL D GAL Z2 2~ 1822 39 i~ ~.~ 58 ? 605,. 77 10324t, "' ~' : '~ ' ~ ~' '~-~'~ ~ ' ' ':' ?'~ ~ ~' ' ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ?'~ ~"/" 6Z Zl 1 40 59 78 1044~,~ ~ ' . ,.~,~, ~ ~7~ ). . . I.j,.~/~. '. :' ',. ' ~,~'.'.~ -' /<~: .~; ZZ ~086 41 '49i2'~: 60 7914,, 79 ~ 056~,, ~0, 24 2359 43 ;5229., 62 8229~/ 81' I080~ JS~ ' ..' ~, :' ' !.~ '~.:- ..~ ~'., ~-. ~ ~ ~, " .... ' .... '" ?' "' ' 314> Z5 2 ~9. 44 g388~, ' 63 [ .... ..',. ~' .. 39~2'}'' Z6 Z640.., 45 5547 d,~ 64 BSZ 1.,. ~3 ~ 1'1019 "~ / "'" ": i'" E' .: ,v '~/ 4~ 27 ~7.83'/y 46 :57.1,~.~ 65 8670,, 84 ~. ,. , ,'.-~.. ~ ,, ~.; ~. ~" ~. >,.. ,.~. ...~ .,.~ ,/q ,/~ .~.? ~?Z u 28 t92 47 ~8~'~ 66 881'7, 8S 11223 7,.~g 30 3221~ 49 6~84,:.. 68 9108. 87 ~' " ,' ?'*~ ~+ ',~.:'~.~ "~' '~'~"~ ~ , '/,4 .. .... so .. ,,"' ~ ,'. ' ~.'~'> ", ~. ~ ..7. ~ , ' ,'~ '"" ~ ~,~ ~, , : ~ ~,C' i'3~'Z':'35 54 ~? 8,, 73 9.80~ J 9Z I t778 c, ,VTV ~.'v- -'. lv/Vu ~ ~l~fv ,/ y..-/ .,'.'~., -: ~.','~z 2, ', .. 1693 38 4441" 57 74~q 76 t~ t ~7 95 DU- Ig, 000-FH ~erm~t No. Kern County llealth Department__ ~ivision of Environmental II~ . A tion Da~e 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfie~ld, CA 93305' (80§) 861-3656 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY Type Of Application (check): ~New Facility ~Modificatton Of Facility ~ExistJng Facility~ransfer Of O~nersh~p A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days Nights Facility Name ,/~ ~:~.5~ ~',~Z~ ''~ ' ~.c~ No. Of Tanks Type Of Business {check): ~Gas(,]ine Statiou ~Other (describe)~c.'(.~ TZP~l{~_. Is Tank(s) Located On An Agricultural Farm? ~Ves ~No Is Tank(s) Used Primarily F. or Agricultural Purposes? ~Y~.'m ~No . Facility Address ~/// ~/~ Z~~ ' ............... ~nnrrn{ (','n .... St. ~/~o~ Owner ___~??(_..~_m&z~ ......................................... ,;-ntn,'~ ~':.~ -:,~,~ Address ~,~. ~-~!f~P~[~..~[_.~_i)~_~.~..~;?.~ (~ .... zip-~-.~.['i ............ ?'- ~ ,:.},,,,,u ~/_~ , Operator U ~nl:~cl_ Address Z i p T~' l B. Water To Facility Provided By ~Z/~P~ e~M.~ ~f~'/~ I)el)th to G[-ouHdwal:f~F Soil Characteristics At Facility Basis For Soil Type and Groundwater Depth Determinations C. Contractor ~&~ CA Contractor's ~,]cense' Nh. ~f~(_~.~ Address ~o ~ ~'~ Z Proposed Starting Date l'roposed Comp]el. ion Worker's Compensation Certification No. Insurer D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An Exist:i ng Faci ] :i ty, Br:i Modl fications Proposed E. Tank{s) Store (check all that apply): Tank ~ Waste Product Motor Vehic te Unleaded Re~[23~L ~tig.¢.j:~U~ Fuel F. Chemical Composition Of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vehicle fueJ Tank ~ Chemical Stored (non-commercial name) CAS ~ (if known) Chemical PreviouslM Stored (if different) 6. Transfer Of Ownership ~ Date Of. Transfer Previous Owner /~o~£~'-~f~ Previous Facility Name /~'£A',~/ [/~/---EY ~'~ I, accept fnlly all obligations of Permit No.o~5%c,~ issued I understand that the Permitting Authority may review and modify or terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this underground storage facility upon receiving this completed form. This form has been completed under penalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledge is true and correct.~~ '/J~"v~/'~ //~/ ' ' Signature / ( Title Date ~?//~/'~. -~ Division ot Environmental Application~D'ate 1700 Flower Street, Bakersfield, CA 93305 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES STORAGE FACILITY _Type o~f Application (check): []New Facility ['~Modification of Facility []Existi~ Facility []Transfer of Ownership A. Emergency 24-Hour Contact (name, area code, phone): Days~¢z~/.~Z~. No. of Tanks ~3~- ' Type of Business (check): FTGas011ne Station ~0ther (describe) Is Tank(s) Located on an Agricultural Farm? [-]Yes [~No Is Tank(s) 'Used Primarily for Agricultgral Pu[poses? [-]'Yes [~NO T R SEC (Rural Locations Only) r B. Water to Facility Provided byc/l~Z/~//~.//~,~/-_.e/z.f~_/~,/~~' Depth to' Groundwater _. Soil Chara6teristlcs' at Facility - ' '~AN~ , Basis for Soil Type and Groundwater 13~pth 13~teminations Address ~ . ~f//~ a Zip {~.F6 '7 Telephone propo~! Stertimj Dete " proposed' Ccmpletion Dete 'i ~//~'/ - Worker' s C~mpansatim certi ficatlon ! Insurer D. If This Permit Is For Modification Of An E~istin~ Facility, Briefly D~ribe Modifications Proposed E. Tank(s). Store (check all that apply) ~ Tank ! Waste.. Product Motor Vehicle Unle__ded Regular Premium Dimmel Wast._ E. Chemical Canpositio~ of Materials Stored (not necessary for motor vahicle fuels) Tank { C~mmical Stored (noa-q~mercis~ nahum, } C~ ! (if .,~} Cheml~ml erevl__o~__. Stored ~,zr cl&rre~enr. I G. Transfer of Owne_rship 2 Date of ~nSfer /U/~ Previous Owner Previous Facility Na~e/ ' ....... I, 'accept full~ all obiiqati~ks' 'of Pe'r~it[ . I understand that the Pemittin~ Authority may ~eview and n~ify or'terminate the transfer of the Permit to Operate this ~dergrotm~d storage facility upon receivin~ this completed form. This form has been completed under"-~nalty of perjury and to the best of my knowledqe is FOR EACH SECTION, CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES 1. Tank is: [] Vaul ted []Non-Vaulted []Double-Wal 1 ~]Single-Wal 1 2. ~ Material Carbon Steel [] stainless Steel [] Polyvinyl Chloride [-] Fiberglass-Clad Steel Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic [] Concrete [] Aluninum~ [] Bronze [~Unknown Other (describe) 3. Primary Containment Dste In~talled Thicknes, s (Inches) Capacity (Gallons) ~nufacturer / /, 4. Tank S~condarY Contair~nent [']-----~uble-Wall [-1Synthetic Liner [-]Lined Vault ~]None []Unknown 1-1Other (describe): Manufacturer: []Material Thickness (Inches) Capacity ' (Gals.) 5. Tank Interior Linin~ --~Rubber' L[']Alkyd []Epoxy []Phenolic []Glass []Clay ~lUnlined []Other (describe): 6. Tank Corrosion Protectfon --~Ga~-~!~ass-Clad ['1Polyethylene Wrap []-[Vinyl Wr&~ptng ·]Tar or Asphalt []']Unknown []None []'1Other (describe): Cathodic Protection: ~]None []Impressed Current System ['l~a~rificisl Anode' Describe System & Equi[~ent: 7. Leak Detection, Monitgrinq, and Interception a. Tank: [~Visual (vaulted tanks only) []Groundwater Monitorin~' Wall(s) []Vadose Zone Monitoring ~ll(s) [~U-Tube Without Liner ~[]U-Tube with C~mpatible Liner Directirg Flow to Monitorin~ Wa.Ii(s)'* Vapor Dstector* []Liquid Level Sensor' []Conductivit~ Sensor' [] Pressure Sensor in Annular Space of Double Wall TankL [] Liquid Nmtrieval & Inspection Fr~m U-Tube, Monitoring Well or ;~ar Space Daily Gauging & Inventory Reconciliation []Pe~riodic Ti~htne~ Tasting No~ [2] Unknown [] Other P~/Z~,~,/< ~c,:,?~/~ d~, b. Piping: Flow-Restrictirg Leak DeteCtor(s) for PresSurized Pipin9' [] Monitoring S~p with Race,my [] Sealed Concrete []Half-Cut C~mpatible Pipe Raceway []Synthetic Liner []unkno~ ~ other ~ *Describe Make &ModeI: ~ " 8. Tank Tightness l~as This Tan~ Been Tightness Tested? ~lYes ~lNo []Unkno~m -. Date of Last Tightness Test f/~/ . Results of Tmstm,/~ Ta---"~Repeired? []Yes ~]No []Unknown Date(s) of Repair(s) , Describe Repairs ' ~ 10. Overfill Protection " .... ,~, []Operator F~ Controls~ & Visually ~onitors Level DTape Float Gauge []Float Vent Valves ~]Auto Shut- Off Control~ B Capacitance Sensor []Sealed Fill Sox ~lNone f'klnkno~a~ lOther~ List Make & Nodel For ~ Devices 11. Piping a. Underground Piping: ~]Yes []No [-]Unknown Thickness (inches) Diameter ~/~ Manufacturer ~Pressure []Socti'on' []Gravity App-~imate Length b. Underground Piping Corrosion Protection : []Galvanized f-lFiberglass-Clad []Impressed Current C1Secrifici&l Anode []Polyethylene Wrap ~]Electrical Isolation C]Vinyl Wrap []Tar or Asl~mlt []Unknown []None ~Other (describe): ~.~e7~,#~£~ c. Underground Pipin~ Secondary Containment: []Double-Wall []Synthetic Liner Syste~ ~None []Unknown []Other (describe): Permi ~ Oues~i onnai re Normally, permits are sent to facility Owners but slnce many Owners live outside Kern County, they may choose to have the permits sent to the Operators of the facility where they are to be posted. Please fill in Permit # and check one of the following before returning this form with payment: 1. Send all information to Owner at the address listed on invoice (if ~ner Is different than Operator, it will be Owner's responsibility to provide Operator with pertinent information). 2. Send all information to ~ner at the following corrected address: 3. Send all information to Operator: Name: Address: (Operator can make copy of permit for Owner). Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary.[hr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 15 May 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Jim Fuller ApexB_ulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Fourth Quarter 2001 Progress Report (Report) dated 8 May 2002 and prepared by your consultant, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield (CSE). By our letters dated 18 December 2000, 7 February 2001, and 20 March 2002, we requested quarterly groundwater monitoring and a specific analytical program. Our letter dated 20 March 2002 also requested that future groundwater monitoring reports be submitted in a timely manner. Groundwater monitoring reports have not been submitted in a timely manner and the quality of the submitted work has been poor. We request that you discontinue quarterly groundwater monitoring. We will review the site for closure upon review of the First Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring report. Summaries of the project and the Report, and our comments follow. Project Summary The site formerly utilized onel2,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one fuel dispenser island. The site is approximately 0.5. mile north of the Kern River. The UST was removed during January 1999. Depth to unconfined groundwater during the removals was approximately 18 feet below ground surface. Diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons and benzene were detected in soil and groundwater samples collected from beneath the former UST system. Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of impacted soils was removed from the site during August 2000. A complete Project Summary may be found in our letter dated 20 March 2002. Report Summary Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 were installed on 19 July 2001 and initially monitored on 23 August 2001. The second groundwater monitoring event was conducted on 3 December 2001. Depth-to-groundwater ranged from 46.02 to 47.37 feet below the tops of the casings. CSE determined California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Jim Fuller - 2 - 15 May 2002' groundwater flow to be toward the north-northeast and the gradient to be 0.0075 feet per foot. Groundwater elevation has declined approximately 10 feet since the initial (23 August 2001) monitoring event. Ground~vater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) by EPA method 8015M, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (BTEX and MTBE) by EPA Method 8021B. TPH-g was not detected. TPH-d was detected in samples collected from all monitoring wells at concentrations ranging from 910 to 1,700 micrograms per liter (gg/L). No other analytes were detected. TPH-d and toluene were detected in the sample collected from MW-1 at 2,100 and 0.46 gg/L, respectively, during the last monitoring event. CSE concludes that the site presents low risk and should be considered for closure. CSE will conduct groundwater monitoring again during the First Quarter 2002. Comments The UST system and approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil impacted with petroleum constituents have been removed from the site. TPH-d and benzene were detected in a groundwater sample collected during excavation. An undetermined volume of impacted soils was left in-place in the excavation sidewalls. Three monitoring wells have been installed around the perimeter of the excavation. TPH-d was detected at 2,100 gg/L in MW-i, the upgradient monitoring well, during the initial (23 August 2001) groundwater monitoring event. TPH-d was detected in all monitoring wells at concentrations ranging from 910 to 1,700 gg/L. TPH-g, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, and EDB were not detected during the first or second monitoring events. We request that groundwater monitoring be discontinued. Regional Board staff will determine site closure requirements following our review of the First Quarter 2002 monitoring report. By a letter dated 23 March 2002, CSE indicated that the First Quarter 2002 monitoring report was scheduled for the week of 25 March 2002 and would be submitted within 30 days subsequent to receipt of laboratory reports. You are to submit the First Quarter 2002 monitoring report by 10 June 2002. ,~ Groundwater monitoring reports have not been submitted in a timely manner. The initial monitoring event was conducted on 23 August 2001 but the initial event report was dated 25 February 2002, six ~i6fith-~-~f~li~ '~0hitb~ing eyeing. ~v'-e-i~d' i-h-~e~r-'d~d ~6' ~I~:~-fi' ~0-2' ~h-a~ i~s y~ur responslbility to perform corrective action (and submit reports) in a timely manner. We requested that monitoring reports be submitted no later than 60 days after each monitoring event. The Fourth Quarter monitoring report was dated 8 May 2002, over five months after the monitoring event. We utilize the monitoring data to determine when site closure is appropriate. Late report submissions delay our efforts to evaluate and close your site and may also cause unnecessary monitoring costs. We are unable to effectively direct the work because we are not receiving monitoring reports until after the next monitoring event has been conducted. CSE has not followed our requested analysis program. By our letters dated 18 December 2000, 7 February 2001, and 20 March 2002, we requested a site-specific analysis program to identify chemicals of concern and determine water quality. Groundwater samples were to be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015M, and BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, 1,2-DCA and EDB by EPA Method 8260. Groundwater samples were also to be analyzed for total lead, general minerals, U:\UGTLIDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield CasesXApex Blk GW 5-02.doc ¢' ~ ~Vlr. Jim Fuller - 3 - ~' 15 May 2002 nitrate, and TKN during two non-consecutive quarterly monitoring events (at least six months apart). However, the samples were not analyzed for nitrate, general minerals, or total lead (but were analyzed for TKN) during the first monitoring event, and were not analyzed for TBA, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, 1,2- DCA, and EDB by EPA Method 8260, or, general minerals, nitrate, TKN, and total lead during the second monitoring event. In the Report text, CSE indicates the direction of groundwater flow is toward the north-northeast and the gradient is 0.0075 feet per foot, which is identical to the August 23 2001 monitoring event. However, a flow direction a flow direction toward the west is indicated by the (unlabeled) groundwater elevation contours depicted on Figure 2 of the Report, the Groundwater Elevation Contour Map. Upon analysis of the data included in the Report, we determined that the groundwater elevations for MW-2 and MW-3 had been transposed on Figure 2. The actual flow direction appears to be toward the north, consistent with the previous monitoring event. Progress to date has not been satisfactory. Your consultant has not provided reports in a timely manner, has not followed the analytical program we requested, and has not demonstrated technical competence. We will consider site closure following review of the First Quarter 2002 monitoring report. If we determine that additional corrective action is necessary, we recommend that you secure the services of a consultant who can provide industry-standard work in a timely manner. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. As of the date of this letter, we have not received the required electronic data submittals for your site. Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, Please contact me at (559) 445-5504. John D. Whiting .. Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosure: Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals... cc: Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST'Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure ~ Mr. Howard Wines 1II, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure Mr. John Wilson, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield, w/enclosure U:\UGTUDW_files\2002 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases~Apex Blk GW 5-02.doc California RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis SecretaryJbr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 20 March 2002 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Jim Fuller Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You submitted Third Quarter 2001 Progress/Expanded Groundwater Assessment Report For Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. (Report) dated 25 February 2002 and prepared by your consultant, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield (CSE). By our letter dated 7 February 2001, we approved Work Plan for Expanded Site Assessment dated 12 January 2001 and prepared by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield (HFA). We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring be initiated and that future groundwater monitoring reports be submitted in a timely manner. Summaries of the project and the Report and our comments follow. Summary of the Pro, iect The site formerly utilized onel2,000-gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one fuel disp.enser island. The site is approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. Depth to unconfined groundwater is approximately 18 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the west-northwest according to data interpreted by the Kern County Water Agency. The diesel UST system was removed under the supervision of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) during January 1999. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg, parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end of the UST. Benzene concentrations of 0.4 rog/kg or less, toluene and ethylbenzene concentrations less than 7 rog/kg and total xylene concentrations less than 35 rog/kg were also detected. Methyl tert-buyl ether (MTBE) was detected at concentrations less than 0.6 rog/kg. The CBFD directed you to conduct a preliminary assessment of the extent of impacted soils and assess the potential for impact to groundwater in a letter dated 30 March 1999. The proposed assessment was implemented during August 1999. Four soil borings were advanced by HFA to a maximum depth of 20 California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Jim Fuller 2 20 March 2002' feet bgs.' Groundwater was encountered at approximately 18 feet bgs. Soils in the boreholes were logged as predominantly sand, silty sand and sandy silt with a silty/clayey silt strata present from approximately 10 to 15 feet bgs in two boreholes. Based on the field and laboratory data, diesel range hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from near the western end of the former UST and north of the former UST to 17 feet bgs. TPH-d up to 30,000 mg/kg and benzene up to 0.56 mg/kg were detected. The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined to the southwest and approximately to the south of the former UST. Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed · in each soil boring. TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples. The highest concentration was detected in B-3, northwest of the former UST. The CBFD requested that the soils most saturated with petroleum be excavated and that confirmation samples.be_collected, from the excax, ation and analyzed for total_petroleum hydrocarbons as .gasoline (TPH-g), TPH-d, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), and for the fuel oxygenates tert- butyl alcohol (TBA), MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB). Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs were excavated during August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soils, except in the central area of the eastern wall and the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of the eastern wall. A concentration of 530 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 280,000 gg/L and a benzene concentration of 9.4 gg/L were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation. The fuel oxygenates TBA, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE and TAME and 1,2-DCA and EDB were not detected by EPA method 8260. The CBFD referred the case to our agency for regulatory oversight by a letter dated 28 November 2000. We requested submission of a work plan for determination of the lateral extent of petroleum constituents in groundwater by our letter dated 18 December 2000. You submitted Expanded Groundwater Assessment At The Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., Bakersfield Terminal (Work Plan) dated 12 January 2001 and prepared by HFA. The Work Plan proposed the installation and sampling of three groundwater monitoring wells. Summary of the Report CSE installed groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 on 19 July 2001 using hollow stem auger technology. MW-1 was installed near Bricyn Lane south-southeast of the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST. MW-2 and MW-3 were installed north-northwest of the former diesel UST and near the site building, respectively. Undisturbed soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals from the borings for logging. Soils encountered in the borings were logged by CSE as sand with a silt layer from approximately 10 to 15 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 23 feet bgs. MW-1 through MW-3 were constructed as standard 2-inch diameter monitoring wells screened from 10 to 50 feet bgs. The initial groundwater monitoring event was conducted on 23 August 2001. Depth-to-groundwater ranged from 36.34 to 37.28 feet below the tops of the casings (below TOC). Groundwater flow was determined to be toward the north-northeast with a slope of 0.0075 feet per foot. Groundwater samples U:\UGT'~JDW_drafts\Apex Blk WP 2-01 .doc Mr. Jim Fuller - 3 - 20 March 2002 were analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA method 8015M, and BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, 1,2-DCA, and EDB by EPA method 8260. The samples were also analyzed for total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). TPH-g was not detected. TPH-d was detected in the sample collected from MW-1 at 2,100 gg/L. Toluene was detected in the sample collected from MW-1 at 0.46 gg/L. TKN was detected in the samples collected from MW- 1 and MW-3 at concentrations of 5 and 0.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L), respectively. Other analytes were not detected. Comments The UST system and approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil impacted with petroleum constituents have been removed from the site. TPH-d and benzene were detected in a groundwater sample collected during excavation. An undetermined volume of impacted soils was left in-place in the excavation sidewalls. Thi:ee mohitorin~ ivells have been installed around the perimeter of the excavation. TPH-d was detected at 2,100 gg/L in MW-1, the upgradient monitoring well, during the initial groundwater monitoring event. Benzene was not detected. We request that quarterly groundwater monitoring be initiated. During the next monitoring event, groundwater samples should be analyzed for TPH-d by EPA method 8015M, and BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, 1,2-DCA and EDB by EPA method 8260. Groundwater samples should also be analyzed for total lead, general minerals, nitrate, and TKN. The scope of analysis may be reduced after our review of data collected during the next monitoring event. We ?equested by our letters dated 18 December 2000 and 7 February 2001 that quarterly groundwater monitoring be initiated and that analysis for general minerals, nitrate, and TKN be included during two nonconsecutive quarterly sampling events (minimum of six months between sampling events). We also requested that analysis for total lead be included in the next quarterly groundwater monitoring evenL We note that analyses for general minerals, nitrate, and total lead were not performed during the initial monitoring event, but that analysis for TKN was performed. We also note that the initial monitoring event was conducted on 23 August 2001 but the Report was dated 25 February 2002, six months after the monitoring event. As the responsible party or their agent, it is your responsibility to perform corrective action in a timely manner. Please insure that groundwater monitoring is performed on a quarterly schedule (every three months) and that groundwater monitoring reports are submitted no later than 60 days after each monitoring event. Also, Please insure that the'~,fialyses ~we reqtiesf are performed. We requested a specific monitoring schedule and analysis program for your site to determine site closure requirements. Please be aware that Sections 2729 and 2729.1 for Underground Storage Tanks were added to the California Code of Regulations requiring you to submit analytical and site data electronically. Enclosed is our letter (Required Electronic Deliverable Format for Laboratory and Site Data Submittals to Regulating Agencies) explaining how to obtain information to implement the requirements. U:\UGTUDW_draftska, pex Blk WP 2-01.doc Mr. Jim Fuller - 4 - 20 March 2002 Please contact this office at least five days in advance of fieldwork. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5'504. John D. Whiting Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 ' Ms. Barbara Rempel, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento, w/o enclosure N% cc: Mr. Howard Wines llI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield, w/o enclosure"--' ....... Mr. Tim Martin,. Central Sierra Environmental, -Bakersfield,._w/enclosure ....... U:\UGTODW_drafts\Apex Blk WP 2-01 .doc O California Regional Water Quality Ontrol Board CentralValleyRegion Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 22 January 2002 CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 0360 0002 9871 4150 Mr. James H. Fuller Apex Bulk commodities Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 OVERDUE REPORTS, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY A release from the former Underground Storage Tank (UST) system at the above-referenced site has impacted soil and groundwater beneath the site and threatens current and future beneficial uses of groundwater. Previous investigation has determined the approximate extent of impacted soils and demonstrated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in shallow groundwater. The UST system and most of the highly impacted soils have been removed from the site. Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) and benzene of 280,000 and 9.4 micrograms per liter (gg/L), respectively, were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the floor of the excavation. These concentrations exceed Primary or Secondary Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). We requested that you submit a report of findings for further site assessment and monitoring well installations, including the results of groundwater monitoring. As of the date of this letter, the reports we requested have not been submitted. The report and subsequent monitoring reports are necessary for Regional Board staff's evaluation of impacts to groundwater. We hereby require that you submit the report of findings and reports for any subsequent groundwater monitoring events. In a letter dated 28 November 2000, the City of Bakersfield Fire Department referred the subject case to our agency for regulatory oversight. We requested a work plan addendum to access petroleum hydrocarbon impacts to groundwater beneath the site by our letter dated 18 December 2000. We approved ,Work Plan for Expanded Groundwater Assessment (work plan) dated 12 January 2001 and prepared by your consultant Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA), Bakersfield by our letter dated 7 February 2001. The work plan proposed the installation and sampling of three groundwater monitoring wells. We requested that a report of findings, including the results of the first groundwater monitoring event, be submitted by 20 April 2001. We again requested these items by our letter dated 6 September 2001. The items were to be submitted by 9 October 2001 or you were to contact this office to discuss your situation. We requested the report of findings and results of groundwater monitoring a third time by our letter dated 29 October 2001. Board staff contacted you on 16 November 2001 to discuss submission of the requested items. As of the date of this letter, we have not received the report of findings or groundwater monitoring results. The progress of site investigation has not been satisfactory. California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Rec~ycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. James H. Fuller - 2 - 22 January 2002 Regional Board authority to request a report derives from Section 13267 of the California Water Code, which specifies, in part, that: "(a) A regional board...in connection with any action relating to any plan or requirement or authorized by this division, may investigate the quality of any waters of the state within its region. (b) In conducting an investigation specified in subdivision (a), the regional board may require that any person discharging or proposing to discharge waste within its region that could affect the quality of water within its region shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, those technical or monitoring program reports as the board may specify. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be obtained from the reports." The discharge from your facility has impacted soil and grouhdwater and represents a threat to health, safety, and the environment, about which the benefit of investigative reports bear a reasonable relationship to the need for preparation. You have not responded satisfactorily to less formal requests from staff. Therefore, under the prescribed authority of Section 13267, you are hereby required to submit the report of findings for monitoring well installations and the groundwater monitoring reports for the Second and Third Quarters of 2001, by 21 February 2002. Poor quality or incomplete reports will not satisfy this request. Some of the remedies available to the Regional Board, should you fall to comply with this request, are outlined in the California Water Code. Any person failing to furnish technical or monitoring reports, as required by Section 13267, or falsifying any information provided therein, is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be 'liable civilly under Section 13268 of the California Water Code. Since you have discharged hazardous waste, civil liability may be administratively imposed by a regional board in accordance with Section 13323 in an amount that shall not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) for each day in which the violation occurs. Or, alternatively, greater civil liability may be imposed by the superior court (see Article 5 commencing with Section 13350). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. John Noonan of this office at (559) 445-5550. Ex/ecUt~ve Officer JMN:jdw cc: Mr. Howard Wines 1]I, Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakers~ Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield Mr. Tim Martin, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield U:\UGTxJDW_files\2002 Con'espondence\City of Bakersfield Cases',Apex13267 1-02.doc Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary for Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Intemet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protect'on 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-5910 29 October 2001 Regional Board Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Randy Gale Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 SECOND NOTICE OF OVERDUE REPORT- UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY By our letter dated 7 February 2001, we approved Work Plan for Expanded Groundwater Assessment dated 12 January 2001 and prepared by your consultant Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., Bakersfield. We requested that a report of findings, including the results of the first groundwater monitoring event, be submitted by 20 April 2001. By our letter dated 6 September 2001, we requested that your consultant submit the report of findings by 9 October 2001 or that you contact this office to discuss your situation. As of the date of this letter we have not received the report of findings and you have not contacted this office. The report is overdue. We remind you that as the responsible party, you must implement corrective action in a timely manner. Please keep in mind that continued failure to comply with our requests will result in enforcement actions and may jeopardize your access to the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund. Should you have questions, please contact Mr. John Whiting at this office at (559) 445-5504. ~ing ' ~J/~' Associate Engineering Geologist cc: Mr. Howard Wines BI, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfieldx''''/ Ms. Judi Nash, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary]'br Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX (559) 445-59t0 6 September 2001 Regional Board Case No. 5T 15000820 Mr. Randy Gale Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 1-253-1-Violet Road _ _ . Adelanto, California 93308 OVERDUE REPORT- UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY In a letter dated 7 February 2001, we approved Work Plan for Expanded Groundwater Assessment (work plan) dated 12 January 2001 and prepared by your consultant Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., Bakersfield. The work plan proposed the installation and sampling of three' groundwater monitoring well~. We requested that a report of findings, including the results of the first groundwater monitoring event, be submitted by 20 April 2001. As of the date of this letter we have not received the report of findings. Please have your consultant submit the report of findings by 9 October 2001 or contact this office to discuss your situation. We remind you that as the responsible party, you must implement corrective action in a timely manner. Please keep in mind that-continued failure to comply with our requests will result in enforcement actions and may jeopardize your access to the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund. Should you have questions, please contact Mr. John Whiting at this office at (559) 445-5504. ~ting~' Associate Engineering Geologist cc: Mr. Howard Wines 1/I, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfield'~d'''4 Ms. Sandy Gill, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield California Environmental! Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 California Regional Water Quality [ontrol Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Winston H. Hickox Gray Davis Secretary.[hr Fresno Branch Office Governor Environmental Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Protection 3614 East Ashlan Avenue, Fresno, California 93726 Phone (559) 445-5116 · FAX_~(559) 445-5910 7 February 2001 YE~ Itl 2001 RWQCB Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Randy Gale Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY You snbmitted Work Plan For Expanded Groundwater Assessment (work plan) dated 12 January 200t and prepared by your consultant, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., Bakersfield (HFA). Board staff required a work plan for installation and sampling of monitoring wells in a letter to you dated 18 December 2000. Diesel fuel was released from the former underground storage tank (UST) system at the subject facility and has degraded soil and groundwater. The extent of soils impacted by diesel fuel has been approximately determined. Corrective action has been implemented to remove impacted soils. Petroleum constituents were detected in groundwater samples collected from the remedial excavation and in groundwater samples collected during previous site investigation. We conditionally approve the work plan. Our review of the work Plan and comments follow. Background Information The City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) referred the subject case to our agency for regulatory oversight. The site formerly utilized onel2,000-gallon diesel UST and one fuel dispenser island. The site is approximately one-half mile north of the Kern River. Depth to unconfined groundwater is approximately 18 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the west-northwest according to data interpreted by the Kern County Water Agency. The diesel UST system was removed under the supervision of the CBFD during January 1999. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg, parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end of the UST. Benzene concentrations of 0.4 mg/kg or less, toluene and ethylbenZene concentrations less than 7 rog/kg and total xylene concentrations less than 35 mg/kg were also detected. Methyl tert-buyl ether (MTBE) was detected at concentrations less than 0.6 mg/kg. The CBFD directed you to conduct a preliminary assessment of the extent of impacted soils and assess the potential for impact to groundwater in a letter dated 30 March 1999. The proposed assessment was implemented during August 1999. Four soil borings were advanced by HFA to a maximum depth of 20 California Environmental Protection Agency ~ Recycled Paper The energy challenge facing California is real. Evet3~ Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 Mr. Randy Gale - 2 - 7 February 2001 feet bgs. 'Groundwater was encountered at approximately 18 feet bgs. Soils in the boreholes were logged as predominantly sand, silty sand and sandy silt with a silty/clayey silt strata present from approximately 10 to 15 feet bgs in two boreholes. Based on the field and laboratory data, diesel range hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from near the western end of the former UST and north of the former UST to 17 feet bgs. TPH-d up to 30,000 mg/kg and benzene up to 0.56 mg/kg were detected. The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined to the southwest and approximately to the south of the former UST. Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed in each soil boring. TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples. The highest concenffation was detected in B-3, northwest of the former UST. The CBFD requested that the soils most saturated with petroleum be excavated and that confirmation samples be collected from the excavation and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), TPH-d, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), and for the fuel oxygenates tert- butyl alcohol (TBA), MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB). Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs were excavated during August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soils, except in the central area of the eastern wall and the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 rog/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of the eastern wall. A concentration of 530 rog/kg was detected in a sample collected from the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 280,000 gg/L and a benzene concentration of 9.4 gg/L were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation. The fuel oxygenates TBA, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE and TAME and 1,2-DCA and EDB were not detected by EPA method 8260. Board staff requested submission of a' work plan for installation and sampling of monitoring wells to determine the lateral extent of petroleum constituents in groundwater beneath the site in a letter to you dated 18 December 2000. Summary of Work Plan HFA proposes to drill three soil borings to a depth of approximately 30 feet bgs and convert the borings into 2-inch diameter monitoring wells. Soil borings will be drilled using 8-inch outer diameter hollow stem augers. Soil samples will not be collected since the borings are to be drilled in an area previously investigated. Soil cuttings will be field screened for petroleum hydrocarbons by visual observation of soil staining or discoloration and for volatile organic vapors using a photo ionization detector (PID). The monitoring wells will be positioned approximately 20 feet north of the east end of the former UST, 40 feet south of the former UST and 35 feet west of the west end of the former UST. After installation the monitoring wells will be developed and sampled and the locations and elevations of the wellheads will be surveyed to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. The monitoring wells will be constructed with 2-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Schedule 40 0.02-inch slotted casing extending from 10 to 30 feet bgs. A gravel pack of#3 sand will surround and extend 3 feet above the slotted casing. A 2-foot thick low permeability bentonite chip seal will be U:\UGTUDW_drafts~Apex Blk WP 2-01.doc Mr. Randy Gale - 3 - 7 February 2001 installed above the sand pack. Blank PVC casing surrounded by an annular seal of neat cement grout will extend above the bentonite seal. Groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA method 8015M, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, 1,2-DCA and EDB by EPA method 8260. Samples will also be analyzed for general minerals, nitrate and total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Investigation procedures, findings, conclusions and recommendations will be presented in a technical report. " Comments The purpose of the proposed investigation is to determine the lateral extent of petroleum constituents in groundwater in the vicinity of the former UST system. Petroleum constituents were present in groundwater in the excavation floor. The excavation did not reach the lateral limit of impacted soil in portions of the northern and eastern sidewalls. The excavation limit and suspected limit of impacted groundwater were presented in HFA's Remedial Action Report dated 30 October 2000 and Preliminary Site Assessment Report dated 24 September 1999, respectively. Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 appear to be located within or near the boundary of the former remediation excavation. The position of MW-2 should be moved beyond the excavation limit and suspected limit of impacted groundwater to approximately 40 feet northwest of boring B-3. MW-1 should be moved approximately 30 feet east of the proposed p.osition. MW-3 should be positioned closer to the building, if possible. Analysis of groundwater samples for total lead should be added to the proposed analyses during the initial monitoring event. Groundwater samples should be analyzed for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two nonconsecutive quarterly sampling events (minimum of six months between sampling events). We approve the scope of work proposed in the work plan provided you follow the recommendations in the above comments. A report of findings, including the results of the first groundwater monitoring event should be submitted to this office prior to 20 April 2001. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. ~itin~g' Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 cc: Mr. Howard Wines 1II, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfie'~d~l Ms. Sandy Gill, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield U:\UGTODW_draftsXApex Blk WP 2-01.doc January 12, 2001 Mr. John Whiting California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 3614 East Ashlan Avenue Fresno, California 93726 Subject: WORK PLAN FOR EXPANDED GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT AT THE APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (CRWQCB-CVR CASE #ST15DODB2D) Dear Mr. Whiting: The following work plan outlines Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) proposed methodology for conducting an expanded groundwater assessment at the above-referenced site. HFA proposes to advance three soil borings to an approximate maximum depth of 30 fbg; complete the soil borings as groundwater monitoring wells; and analyze four groundwater samples (including a travel blank) for TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, EDB, TKN, nitrate, and general.minerals during this phase of site assessment. This work Is being required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (5) (CRWQCB-CVR), in its letter dated December 18, 2000, as a result of the discovery of dissolved-phase TPH as diesel and benzene concentrations in the groundwater in and around the area of the former 12,000-gallon diesel UST at the site (see Attachment 1 for a copy of the CRWQCB-CVR letter dated December 18, 2000). 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE: The purpose of this work plan is to outline the methodology to be followed for the assessment of the diesel-containing groundwater at the subject site. The proposed scope of work for this project includes the following major tasks: · develop a work plan and worker health and safety plan for the expanded groundwater assessment at the Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., Bakersfield Terminal: · advance three soil borings to an approximate maximum depth of 30 fbg, and complete them as groundwater monitoring wells; ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS . ENGINEERS Cortlaitii~lalc~(l SJl(~s ASS(2S.%III(~IIIS ° Phase 1 A~tils * ~il~ IR(~me(lialion · I-laza~d W~ISt(~ M~rt~i~e~leDl Vemum, California lEI001 Cypress. California 90630 l~akemlield, Califl'~rnia 93308 I~he{.fix. A,iz(~n;~ 8503,1 (805} 652 0219 (7 I 4) 236-174 I ((;61) 391 0517 (gO()} 789 0219 * (602) ,12{i- I000 {8051 652 0793 FAx (714) 236-1745 (~;(3 Il 391 -(t826 FAX (~i02) ,12G 0113 FAX ~-~.-- I HOL©UIN Mr. John Whiting .,~--~--/k] CRWQCB-CVR FAI-IAN January 12, 2001 - Page 2 & ASSOCIATF~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS · anolyze four groundwater somples (including a travel blank) for TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, EDB, 1-KN, nitrate, and general minerals; and · prepare an Expanded Groundwater Assessment Report documenting the drilling activities, sample results, data analysis, conclusions, and recommendations for any further action that may be necessary. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is located at 2111 Bricyn Lane in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site is located within the commercial/industrial district, which flanks Rosedale Highway (State Highway 58). The site is located within the southeastern quarter of the northwestern quarter of Section 26, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, MDBM. Formerly located at the property were one 12,000-gallon diesel UST and a single dispenser. Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan). The property owner contact is Mr. Randy Gale, Apex Bulk Commodities, inc., 12531 Violet Road, Adelanto, California, 92301, (800) 767-3401 ext. 2102. The consultant contact is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. 3. SITE MAPS: Site maps are included as Figures 1 and 2. 4. TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND HYDROGEOLOGY: The site is located at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography slopes slightly to the west-southwest (see Figure 1). The subject site is located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west- of the southern Sierra Nevada. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11~00 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake-bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 50,000 fbg (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). At the subject site, surface deposits consist of Quaternary (recent) unconsolidated alluvium overlying Quaternary (Pleistocene) nonmarine sediments. Geologic deposits in the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments that form a homocline dipping gently to the west-southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of indurated and dissected fan ~ I-IOLGUIN Mn John Whiting CRW©CB-CVR FAHAN Januan/12, 2001 - Page 3 & ASSOCIA~FI7~C~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS deposits (CDMG, 1965). Surface soils are classified by the Soils Conservation Services as Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex and are characterized as 35 percent Kimberlina fine, sandy loam with moderate permeability; 30 percent Urban land with impervious surfaces and altered fills; and 20 percent Cajon loamy sand with high permeability. The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The GreatValley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately 400 miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east and are transported by five major rivers, the closest to the site being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of the · Kern River. The depth to the regional, unconfined aquifer is approximately 20 fbg, and the groundwater gradient is to the west-northwest, away from the Kern River (Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), 1998, 1997 Report on Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4, February 1, 1998). Perched groundwater is known to be present flanking the current course of the Kern River, but is not known to extend to the site (KCWA, 2000, 1996 Water Supply Report, July 2000). 5. TANK HISTORY: Formerly located at the property were one 12,000-gallon diesel UST and a single dispenser. Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site (see Figure 2). 6. IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF MATERIAL RELEASED: Diesel hydrocarbons: the quantity released is unknown. 7. PREVIOUS WORK: On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, under Permit #BR-0247 with the Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division (BFDESD). Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel U ST (,see Attachment 2 for a summary of previous work). Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, the BFDESD, in its letter dated March 30, 1999, requested a preliminary site assessment to determine the vertical and lateral limits of diesel-containing soils and assess the potential for the release to impact -~-,ilP I-IOLOUIN Mr, John Whiting CRWQCB-CVR ~ FAFIAN ~ January 12, 2001 - Page 4 '"~'~ & ASSOCIATE.S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS groundwater resources. HFA prepared a work plan dated June 30, l~7~, to perform the requested work, which was subsequently approved for implementation by the BFDESD. in its letter dated July 8, 1999. HFA performed the drilling and sampling on August 4, 1999. Four soil borings (B- 1 through B-4) were drilled during this phase of soil investigation (see Figure 2 for the soil boring locations). Because groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 18 fbg in each soil boring, the soil borings were installed as temporary well points, and Hydropunchm-type groundwater samples were collected from each well point. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-1 to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, and in downgradient soil boring B-3 in the capillary fringe soils immediately above groundwater. Minor adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the near-surface soil samples collected from upgradient soil boring B-4. Adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-2 drilled through the location of the former dispenser, Trace to nondetectable, adsorbed-phase BTEX and MTBE concentrations were observed in the 14 soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis. Dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentrations in excess of the CCR Title 22 drinking water MCL were detected in the groundwater samples collected from the four temporary well points reaching a maximum dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentration of 80~00 pg/I in the groundwater sample collected from downgradient soil boring B-3 (see Attachment 1). Based on laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples collected during the preliminary site assessment, the BFDESD requested that remedial action in the form of excavation of the most saturated hydrocarbon-containing soils beneath the former UST be performed. On August 7 through 10, 2::O~, approximately 1~]0 cubic yards of soil was excavated by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, in and around the area of the former UST to a maximum depth of approximately 18 fbg. On August 10, 2000, one soil sample (B-7-18) was collected from the base of the excavation at a depth of 18 fbg; one soil sample (CWW-1-18) was collected from the center of the western sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg; two soil samples (WSW-2-18 and ESW-3-18) were collected from the western and eastern halves, respectively, of the southern sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg; one soil sample (CEW-1-18) was collected from the center of the eastern sidewall at a depth of 17 fbg; and two soil samples (ENW-5-18 and WNW-6-18) were collected from the eastern and western halves, respectively, of the northern sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg. Mr. John Whiting ~ I-tOLOUIN, CRWQCB-CVR FAI-IAN January 12. 2001 - Page 5 & ASSOCIATF~<5, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT' CONSULTANTS Adsorbed-phase IPH as diesel concenfrations were detected in lhe soil sample collected from the eoslern half of the southern sidewall (ESW-3-]8).. Adsorbed-phase IPH as gasoline, TPH os diesel, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes concenhotions were detecled in the soil sample collected from the center of the eastern sidewall (CEW-4-17) at a deplh of 17 fbg and in the soil sample collected from the eastern half of the northern sidewall (ENW-5-18) at a depth of ]8 fbg. Adsorbed-phase TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, and BTEX concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from the center of the western sidewall (CWW-1-18), the western half of the southern sidewall (WSW-2-1 8), the western half of the northern sidewall (WNW-6-18), and in the sample collected from the base.of the excavation (B-7-18) at a depth of 18 fbg. Additionally, adsorbed-phase benzene, MTBE, TAME, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, EDB, and 1,2-DCA concentrations were not detected in the seven soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis. HFA also collected a grab sample of the groundwater that seeped into the base of the excavation. Dissolved-phase TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, an~t BTEX concentrations were detected in the groundwater grab sample collected from the base of the excavation. However, dissolved-phase MTBE, TAME, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, EDB, and 12_-DCA concentrations were not detected in the groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation (see Attachment 2). Upon receiving BFDESD approval, the excavation was backfilled with import material, compacted, returned to surface grade, and covered by an asphalt surface. Approximately 984 tons of the excavated soil was transported in covered, end dump trucks to SoilRem's Bakersfield facility for recycling. Based upon the laboratory analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples collected from the excavation, the BFDESD referred the site to the CRWQCB-CVR for oversight of the assessment of the extent of remaining diesel-containing groundwater. The CRWQCB-CVR, in its letter dated December 18, 2000, requested submission of a work plan, prior to February 1, 20(~, to perform an expanded groundwater assessment to assess the limits of diesel-containing groundwater at the site. 8. STRATEGY AND PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING THE LATERAL EXTENT OF DIESEL-CONTAINING GROUNDWATER: The Intent of this work plan is to present the methodologies to be used to assess the lateral extent of diesel-containing groundwater at the site. HFA proposes to accomplish this by drilling three soil borings (MW-1 through MW-3) to a depth of approximately 40 fbg, completing the three soil borings as groundwater monitoring wells, and analyzing four groundwater samples (including a travel blank) for TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, 1,2-DCA, EDB, TKN, nitrate, and general minerals (see Figure 2 for the proposed monitoring well locations). HOL©UIN, Mr. John Whiling CRWQCB-CVR FAI4AN January 12, 2001 - Page6 ~ & ASSOCIATE_S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 9. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: Prior to any intrusive methods being conducted at lhe site, Underground Service Alert of Northern California will be utilized to map out the underground structures. Based on the clearances obtained, HFA will site the monitoring wells in safe locations. A total of three soil borings will be advanced during this expanded site characterization. The soil borings will be drilled with an 8-inch-OD hollow-stem auger to an approximate maximum depth of 30 fbg. During the drilling process, soil cuttings, as well as each soil sample, will be field-screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene, and observations will be made for the visual identification of any soil staining or discoloration. Soils will be classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System by an experienced environmental .geologist under the direct supervision of a state of California registered geologist, and all data will be recorded on logs of exploratory borings. Soil sampling will not be performed because these soil borings are being drilled in an area that was previously assessed 'and soil excavation has been conducted (see Attachment 3 for the soil boring and well construction procedures). The groundwater monitoring wells will be installed in accordance with the State of California Department of Water Resources Water Well Standards, Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90, as well as CRWQCB-CVR regulations. The wells will be drilled to a depth of approximately 30 fbg (12 feet below the groundwater surface) and installed with 20 feet of slotted PVC casing. The monitoring wells will be constructed with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing and the appropriate filter pack sand installed from the bottom of the soil boring to 3 feet above the slotted interval. Blank PVC casing packed in neat cement grout will extend from the surface downward to the 3-foot bentonite seal placed above the filter pack. Locking, water-tight well covers will be set in concrete to protect and secure the wellheads (see Attachment 4 for the monitoring well construction details), Following installation, the monitoring wells will be developed by surging and bailing to remove drilling residues and to produce Iow-turbidity groundwater. Prior to sampling, the proposed monitoring wells will be purged with a pre-cleaned bailer in order to remove stagnant water in the wells. During purging, key parameters including temperature, conductivity, and pH will be measured with a portable electronic meter and recorded. The purging will continue until the monitored parameters stabilize (usually after 3 casing. volumes of groundwater have been removed). Following purging, groundwater samples will be collected with pre-cleaned TeflonTM bailers and discharged with a non-aerating, bottom-emptying device into sterilized glass containers, capped with TeflonTM septa, labeled, and chilled in an ice chest for transporl. The proposed monitoring wells will be --_,~sw~- 1 IqOLGUIN, MI'. ,John Whiling CRWQCB-CVR FAHAN January 12, 2001 - Page 7 & AS$OCIATI~, INC. ENVlI~ONMENTAL M~,N~,E~EMENT CONSULTANTS surveyed relative to a permanent structure, and from a designated point on the northern side of the top of the well casing, the groundwater level will be measured in the wells to an accuracy of +0.01 foot. The groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH as gasoline and TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 [M); and BTEX, MTBE, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, TAME. 1,2-DCA, and EDB using EPA Method 8260; as well as TKN; nitrate; and general minerals (see Attachment 5 for the well purging and groundwater sampling procedures). Upon completion of the drilling and sampling activities and receipt of the laboratory report, HFA will provide an Expanded Groundwater Assessment Report that details the field activities, sample collection, analytical results, data analysis, conclusions, and HFA's recommendation for further assessment or remedial activities, if required. Certified I~boratory reports and chain-of-custody documents will be included. 10. EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES: Sampling equipment will be decontaminated using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and a distilled, deionized water rinse. The drill auger will be decontaminated in a similar manner between sampling locations. 11. WASTE DISPOSAL PROCEDURES: All drill cuttings, sample spoils, and development and purge water that exhibit discoloration, odors, or elevated field-screening readings will be segregated and containerized in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation-approved drums pending laboratory analytical results. If contaminated, the waste will be hauled off site to an appropriate licensed facility for disposal or recycling. If uncontaminated, soil cuttings will be spread as grading fill at the site. 12. EMERGENCY OR INTERIM CLEANUP: Not applicable. 13. WORK SCHEDULE: Work will begin within 45 days subsequent to the acceptance of this work plan by the CRWQCB-CVR. The CRWQCB-CVR will be notified at least 48 hours before any on-site work commences. An Expanded Groundwater Assessment Report will be submitted to the CRWQCB-CVR approximately 45 days after commencement of the work. 14. SITE SAFETY PLAN: A worker health and safety plan developed by HFA's industrial hygienist for UST site investigations outlines the procedures for conducting all on-site work. Site-specific information is provided on the cover page of the worker health and safety plan (see Attachment 6 for the worker health and safety plan). _~ I-tOI_OUIN Mr. John Whiting ., CRWQCB-CVR ~ FAHAN January 12. 2001 - Page 8 ~ & A$SOCiATIE~, INC. EN'v'II~ONMENT,~.L M.Z~.N~,~:-:-~EMENT CONSULT~5,NTS All work will'be conducted in accordance with all regulatory requirements as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board's LUFT Field Manual and the CRWQCB-CVR guidance documents. Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., trusts that you will find this work plan to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, Id Mark R. Magargee, CHG, ~G Assistant Environmental Professional Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. , Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. MRM:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Attachment 1 - CRWQCB-CVR Letter Dated December 18, 2000 Attachment 2 - Summary of Previous Work Attachment 3 - Soil Boring and Well Construction Procedures Attachment 4 - Monitoring Well Construction Details Attachment 5 - Well Purging and Groundwater Sampling Procedures Attachment 6 - Worker Health and Safety Plan cc: Mr. Randy Gale, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Mr. Howard Wines, BFDESD I_iOi_.©UiNi Mr. John Whiting " ~ CRWQCB-CVR ~ I=AI-IAN Januan¢ 12, 2001 - Page 9 ~ & AS$OC1ATF2.S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS .~ ,~ ~ q ~- .....- ~ , · ...~e ........ : ............... ,~.-~/ o ~.-o 7=~-,/'/;-~-' ~':,~ _w~~~ ..h: ~'~' '~ ~...::: .............. ;.,'"'; .......................... I.~ I~ o .~ '~'l .... 'k '" ' ~. ~~ ~,~ .. , ,~- ,.," ~o ~ ....... C " - ~ ' ,' :., · ~ ...... ~.-.- ~ ~ ~/,,~=' o -" ,,<::: ...... J~ ~o o,o ~ ~ .~ ..... ~ o , .-' o ~ u I ~/ ~ Sum~ ', ~ I ~ · ' // .~:Zx ]~nk~ o ' ,f' ..... e; , o o --o ,,,., 22 ~0', ~- , , ~ o~,, ~.', .... ~ .~ /. J~...-. ~ . o ~=~-~.'r~ -" :.: ~ ~ ~- .'~ . ' ,~'- . ~ /// )~/~r.~~. ~**~,'~ ::~ :: ~ · ~ ~, " - '*~ o ,,:,, ,, o.jz .... ~.~~ ' ' ON'- ~ ~ ~~ o .. SITE LOCATI ~"II .... ~ : ~t ,'~ _- ..... ~ ~. :'~ , ~==~* · ............. ~ .... il /' o I ' -- ~ .... ~_ ~ . .. · LEGEND APEX BUL~ COmmODITIES, IHC. ' ~ ~ : ! I I ~ I i ~-- 21 11 I31~I(]YN I_ANI: ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ . ~ I ~ FI(-;III:tl~ 1 ~1'I't~ I_()CATION MAP i u:., ,,-,.,, ~t,,~ i: ~ ,., ,~.~H ~;~ .. ~; ,mA~.~AN(;~ ~ liOI.(;UI~, itAIIA~ ~ ASSOClA'I'I~S, INC. HOLOUIN Mr. John Whiting ~ CRWQCB-CVR ~ FAI-I,AJ~ January 12, 2001 - Page 10 ~ & ASSOCIATE.S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 70 feel EXISTING ~INJ 12,000~GALLON DIESEL AST I B-3 MW-2 ~ ~ ~ORMER ~ 12.000-GALLON / \ DIESEL UST \\ BUILDING T FOIRMER MW-1 B-4 SCA~E IN FFE] LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 Bt~ICYN I ANF SOIL BOI~ING ' BAKERSFII:LD, GAt_It (/I:INIA FIGURE 2 - PI._OT PI AN I"I]OPOSEI) (~ROUNDWA'I'EI~ MONII'ORING WELL LOCATION ~ FAI-IAN ~ & A$$OCIATI2_~%. INC. ENVII::IONME'NTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. CRWQCB-CVR LETTER DATED DECEMBER 18, 2000 "Calit'ornia cgionalcelltra!WatervaneyQualityOControlRe io. Board Winston It. ilickox Fresno Branch Office (.;ray Davis .~'ec'refot-y/0r hl{~H~el Address: htlp;//www.~wfcb c:Lg(w/~rwqcb5 (.7~ vernor FILE GPY Protection I'hmm(sfig)445-51 6, FAX (559),I45~5910 18 December 2000 RWQCB Case No. 5'F 15000820 Mr. Randy Gale Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX'BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY In a letter dated 28 November 2000, the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) referred the subject case to our agency for regulatory oversight. It also provided us with information that indicates diesel fuel leaked at the subject facility and degraded soil and groundwater. The extent of soils impacted by diesel fuel has been approximately determined. Corrective action has been implemented to remove impacted soils. Petroleum constituents were detected in groundwater in the remedial excavation. It will be necessary for you to determine the extent of groundwater contamination caused by the leak. Background Information The CBFD provided copies of two reports- the Preliminary Site Assessment Report For Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Bakersfield Terminal and Remedial Action Report For Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Bakersfield Terminal, 211 ! Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California, dated 12 September 2000. Your consultant, Holguin, Fahan & Associates (HFA), prepared both reports. The site formerly utilized one 12, 000-gallon diesel UST and one fuel dispenser island. The site is approximately one-half mile north of the Kern River. Depth to unconfined groundwater is approximately 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the west-northwest. The diesel UST, dispenser and associated piping were removed by BC Enterprises, Bakersfield under the 'supervision of the CBFD on January 22, 1999. Soil samples were collected from approximately 2 feet and 6 feet beneath the center and both ends of the UST invert (14 and 18 feet bgs). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (nag/kg, parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end of the UST. Benzene concentrations of 0.4 rog/kg or less, Iolucne and ethylbenzene conccnirations less than 7 rog/kg and total xylene concentrations less than 35 rog/kg were detected in ~hese samp es. Methyl tert-buyl clhcr (MTBE) was dctcclcd ;tt c{)nccntral'ions less than 0.6 rog/kg. Pet-o pc n c~mstitttent analysis was by EPA melhod 8020. TPH-Lz wax nol dcltx;Icd ill soil samples collected bcncatl'l the center alld cuSlCl-ll clld the USTwilhoneexcepliCm('l'l'l-I-g<25mg/kg). Benzcncand MTB[:.wcrcll(tldetected il/these samples. (_.'al(]brttia Eltviroltmetttal Protectio, AL.,eiicy ' Mr. 1(Smcly Gale - 2 - 18 December 2000 Reports Summary Thc CBFI) directed in a letter dated 30 March 1999 thai you conduct preliminary assessment of the extent of impacled soils and assess the polential I'or impact to groundwater. A work plan for preliminary assessmem was submitted by ItFA oil 30 June 1999 and was approved by the CBFD in a letter dated 8 July 1999. The proposed assessment was implememed on 4 August 1999. Four soil borings were advanced by HFA to a maximum depth of 20 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 18 feet bgs. Soils in the boreboles were logged as predominantly sand, silty sand and sandy silt with a silty/clayey silt strata present from approximately 10 to 15 feet bgs in two boreholes. Based on the field and laboratory data, diesel range hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from near the western end of the former UST and north of the former UST to 17 feet bgs. TPH-d up to 30,000 rog/kg and benzene up to 0.56 mg/kg were detected..The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined to the southwest and approximately to the south of the former UST. Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed in each soil boring. TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples. The highest concentration was detected in B-3, located in the assumed downgradient position. HFA recorhmended that the most highly saturated soils be excavated and disposed of offsite and that three monitoring wells be installed to determine presence and extent of diesel range hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater beneath the site. The BCFD requested that the soils most saturated with petroleum be excavated and that confirmation samples be collected from the excavation and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), TPH-d, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), and for the fuel oxygenates tert- butyl alcohol (TBA), MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB). The excavation of approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs was performed by BC Enterprises, Bakersfield on 7 August through 10 August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soils, except in the central area of the eastern wall and the eastern half of the northern wall, based on field observations and soil sample analytical results. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of'the eastern wall. A concentration of 530 mg/kg was detected in a sarnple collected from the eastern half of tile no~lhern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 280,000 ggFL and a benzene concentration of 9.4 Hg/L were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base ot' the excavation. The fuel oxygenates TBA, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE and TAME and 1,2-DCA and EDB were not detected by EPA method 8260. Folloxving c{)rrective aclion HFA again recommended inslallalion and salnpling of al leasl Ihl'ee lrl()nil()ri[l!_, wells I() :~ del)Ih ~)I' 31) I't~.¢t I~,,<~_ xvi[h sci'coned intervals from It) I() _3(') feet b~s... '; Mt'. l~,'andy Gale - 3 - I$ Decem/~cr 2000 Comlll(~nJ$ Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: Thc UST system and thc most highly impacted soils have been removed fi'om the Kite. Removal of these sources should greatly reduce further impact on groundwater quality. TPH-d and benzene have been detected in groundwater in thc vicinity of the former USTs. Extent of petroleum constituents in groundwater has not been defined. Investigation to determine the extent and concentration of petroleum constituents in groundwater is required prior to consideration of the site for closure. Work Plan Request Prior to 1 February 2001, please have your consultant provide a brief work plan addendmn to assess petroleum hydrocarbon impacts to groundwater beneath the site. We require the installation of at least three monitoring wells. The combined content of the work plan addendum and the February 28, 2000 Work Plan for Further Subsurface Investigation, in general, should comply with the enclosed Tri- Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage Tank Sites and Appendix A-Reports Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage Tank Sites. The work plan shall also include a sampling and analysis plan for grotindwater. The sampling and analysis plan is to include, at a minimum, rational for sampling and analysis frequency, sample preservation methods, laboratory quality assurance/quality control procedures, proposed detection limits, analytical methods and a list of analytes for those methods. All potential COCs will be included in the initial analysis. The potential COCs are to initially include, at a minimum, TPH-d, TPH-g, BTEX, 1,2-DCA, EDB, total lead, MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE, and TBA. The sampling plan may propose that future analyses for the COCs be performed by different methods than the initial analyses, or that certain analyses be discontinued once the presence or absence of potential COCs have been confirmed. The initial sampling is to include analytical methods that clearly demonstrate the presence or absence of potential COCs. In addition to the COCs, we require that you sample groundwater for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two nonconsecutive quarterly sampling events (minimum of six months between sampling events). It is not necessary to sample all monitoring wells for these constituents during these sampling events; a minimum of three wells, including at least one upgradient well, should be sufficient. The work plan should include a time schedule to implement the plan and submit reports. All submittals should contain the signature and seal .of a California registered engineer, certified engineering geologist, or registered geologist who is responsible for the content of the submittal. Identification of Other Reslmnsil)le Party Notification If you have evidence to supporl identification of other potentially responsible parties for degradation at this Kite, we request Ihat you identify thmn now by providing such evidence so they may bc notified of lhe p(~tcntial responsibility. Evidence should include the beginning and ending dates and lypc of documenls that w~mJd vc~'ifv Iht terms and condilions el: involvement. Mr. Rar~dy Gale - 4 - 18 l)ecc~nl~er 2000 Cleanup Fund Notice You should bc aware ot' legislation to assist owners and operators o1: underground tanks. Scnalor Keene's Senate Bill 2004 (Cleanup Fund Program) offers several forms of assistance for investigation and cleanup of underground tank discharges. You may w;ml to contact the State Water Resources Control Board at (800) 813-3863 abont the Cleanup Fund Program. An application l'or and in l:ormation on the Cleanup Fund Program is enclosed. If you have not already applied for the Cleanup Fund Program, we strongly urge tha.t you do. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund's Successful Corrective Action, A Tank Owner's Guide. The guide Contains information on choosing a consultant and obtaining a good bid (three bids are required to be eligible for reimbursement under the Cleanup Fund Program). Also, staff administering the Cleanup Fund Program have indicated that all costs for corrective action nmst meet the requirements of Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations (Article 11). For your convenience, a copy of Article 11 is enclosed. Landowner Notification Our records indicate that you are the "primary or active" responsible party for the subject site. Under the new "landowner notification" of Health and Safety Code, Section 25299.37.2 (copy enclosed), all current record owners of fee title to the site are required to be notified of your proposed actions relating to investigation, cleanup, and closure of this site. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosures: Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage 'Tank Sites Appendix A-Reports Successful Corrective Action, A Tank Owners Guide Cleanup Fund Application Article 11, Health and Safety Code cc w/o enclosures: Mr. Howard Wines HI, City of Bakersfield Fir.e Department, Bakersfield Ms. Sandy Gill, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacrament6",,,\ Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfiel~-_~ It:\t ('l\J)W.hh.,,'\ll)'~\; , I (<~./Xpex I~.ulk ('()lure Isl I.Ir(Ioc IqOLGUIN~t ~ FAIqAN ~" ~ & ASSOCIATE. S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK 70 feet EXISTING 12,000-GALLON DIESEL AST ~.~ FORMER ~ BUILL)INU ~ FORMER BRICYN LANE / 0 2o 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 21 1 1 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 1 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2001: RRI 5 -I-- ND/ND/ND 10--l- ND/ND/ND 15--I- 2,900/0.012/ND B-3~ 17--I- 30,000/0.56/0.074 10--~1- ND/ND/ND 15'JF' 2,600/0.0061/ND/ ........~fK-~E..--J / B-I--I''' 'TK-1C . / ~'x ~,.*..TK-~W141 ND/ND~ND BRICYN / 0 2O 4O LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111 BRICYN LANE ,,~ SOIL BORING BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA #_L DEPTH OF SAMPLE (fbg) FIGURE 2 - TPH AS DiESEL/BENZENFJMTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL _L.#/#/# TPH AS DIESEL/BENZENE/MTBE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (mg/kg) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: DECEMBER 9.2001: RRI 0'"-. ENW-5-18'"-... RAMP WNW-6-18 ". 0EW-4-17 d',, · EW-1 ', "\ ESW_3.18Oi "-.? WSW-2-18 ...../~ ............ / LIMIT OF EXCAVATION 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. © POST-EXCAVATION SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · POST-EXCAVATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATION FIGURE 3 - PLOT PLAN SHOWING EXCAVATION LIMITS HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. REVISION DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2001: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR TANK REMOVAL APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA DATE DEPTH SAMPLEtt TPHAS BENZENE (mg/kg) ETHYL' I TOTAL J SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED ID DIESEL TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF (fbg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD I 8015 (M) i 8020 i N/A REPORTING LIMIT 101 0.0051 0.0051 0.0051 0.0051 0.02! N/A ... 1-22-99'I 18 TK-IW-18 17,000 0.39 6.8i ~ 0.581 A Center of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TN-lC-14 ND ND ND 0.0068 0.0261 ND! A 1-22-99 18 TK-10-18 24ND ND ND 0.0131 NDI A 1-22-99 18 TK-1E-18 ND NDIND ND ND NDI A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated February 25, 1999. TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR DRILLING APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE DATE/ / SAMPLE TPHAS i ETHYL- TOTAL SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH ID DIESEL 13ENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF I I (fbg) '(me/kg) (me/kg) (me/kg) i (me/kg) (me/kg) (me/kg) I. EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) 8020 0.02 N/A REPORTING LIMIT 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015! N/A B-1 8-4-99 5 I B-1-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 10 [ B-1-10 ND ND ND ND NDNDND A 8-4-99 I 151 B-1-15 I 2,600 0.0061 0.031 --- 0.86 1.1 A I 8-4-99 15 B-2-15 I ND NDI NDI NDND~ N~ A B-3 8-4-99 5 B-3-5 I ND ND .... NDI ND N_D ND! A 8-4-99 15 B-3-15 2,900 0.012 0.25 1.5 NDi A 8-4-99 17 B-3~17 30,000 0.561 13 35 71 0.074 A B-4 8-4-99 5 B-4-5 170 ND 0.0094~ 0.022 0.12 ND! A 8-4-99 10 B-4-10 12 ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 15 13-4-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND A 8-4-99 17 B-4-17 ND ND ND ND ND ND. A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24, 1999. TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR EXCAVATION APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLEDi DEPTH, SAMPLE D GASOL NE DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES ,2-DCA~ REF I , (fbg) I (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg) (ms/kg), (mg/kg)l (ms/kg) i(mg/kg), EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD I 8015 (M/ J 8020 I 8260 ! N/A REPORTING LIMIT I VARIES-SEE LABORATORY REPORT ! N/A Western Half of Southern Walll 8-10-00 ! 18 I WSW-2-18i NDI ND ND NDI NOI ND NDII NDi NDi NDI NDI ND[ ND[ A Eastern Half of Northern WatlI 8-10-00[ 18 ENW-5-18 530 NE) 0.17 0.0271 NDt NDI ND NO NDI ND! A Western Half of Northern WallI 8-10-00 I 18 WNW-6-18 ND ND ND ND ND NDI NDI NDI ND ND NDI NDI A Sase of Excavation* I 8-10-00 I 18 I EW-1I 280,000 9.4 NO 25ND93 ND1 NOl O NOI ND NDI NDI A TRAVEL BLANK [ 8-10-00 i N/A I TB-1 I ~'1~ I ~ -- ND ND ND NDI " I ..... I " i " I A REF = Report reference, N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. - = Not analyzed. Sample EW-1 is a water grab sample collected from water pooled in the base of the excavation at 18 fbg. Results are expressed in pg/L 'Groundwater grab sample analyzed using EPA Methods 8015 (M), 602, and 8260. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated October 30, 2000. TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FLOATING SAMPLE ! DATE DEPTH TO PRODUCT SOURCE SAMPLED GROUNDWATER THICKNESS TPH AS DIESEL REF (feet-MSL) I (fbg) (feet) (tJg/I) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (U) N/A CCR TITLE 22 MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL 100 N/A MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT 50 N/A B-1 I 8-4-99 -18 0.00 1,500! A B-2 ! 8-4-99 - 18 0.00 800 A I , B-3 i 8-4-99 [ -181 0.00 80,000 A B-4 I 8-4-99 I -18] 0.00 1,400 A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24. 1999. "~1 HOL©LIIN, FAVIAN & A$$OCIATF~S, INC. ENVIF:~ONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. SOIL BORING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES SOIL BORING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES HAND-AUGERING PROCEDURES Each soil boring is manually drilled utilizing a 2-inch-©D hand auger manufactured by Xitech Industries. Soil samples are collected with a drive sampler, which is outfitted with '1.5-inch by 3-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are field screened for VOCs using a PtD calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration is visually identified. All data is recorded on logs of exploratory boring under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Specific geologic and hydrogeologic information collected includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, structure, grain size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled in accordance with the procedures outlined in the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) QA/QC procedures. The samples are transported in a chilled container to a California state-certified hazardous waste testing laboratory. TRUCK-MOUNTED DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Underground Service Alert of Northern California is notified at least 48 hours before drilling activities commence. Each soil boring is manually drilled for the first 4 feet to establish that the area is clear of subsurface structures. The soil borings are drilled with either a hollow-stem auger or an air rotary bit, and soil samples are collected with a California modified split-spoon sampler. The sampler is outfitted with 1.5-inch by 6-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are field screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 1[~0 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration is visually identified. All data is recorded on logs of exploratory boring under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are classified according to the USCS. Specific geologic and hydrogeologic information collected includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, structure, grain size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled in accordance with the procedures outlined in the SWRCB's LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with HFA's QA/QC procedures. The samples are Soil Boring Construction Procedures Page 2 transported in a chilled container to a California state-certified, hazardous waste testing laboratory. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Before each sampling episode, the sampling equipment is decontaminated using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and two deionized water rinses. The drill string is decontaminated with a steam cleaner between each soil boring. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL The cuttings from the soil borings are stored in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation (D©T)-approved drums. Each drum is labeled with the number of the soil boring from which the waste is taken and the date the waste was generated. The drums are stored at the site of generation until sample analytical results are obtained, at which time the soil is disposed of appropriately. SOIL BORING COMPLETION PROCEDURES All soil borings are either properly abandoned or completed as a well. Abandonment Each soil boring that is not completed as a well is backfilled with bentonite grout, neat cement, concrete, or bentonite chips with a permeability less than that of the surrounding soils. The grout is placed by the tremie method. Well Construction Wells are designed according to Department of Health Services and State Water Resources Control Board guidance manuals. All well design and construction completed during the investigation are documented with the following information: · Date/time of construction; · Detailed drawing of well; · Drilling method and drilling fluid used; · Well development procedures; · Well location (_+5 feet); · Screen slot size/length; · Well depth (_+0.1 foot); · Filter pack material and size; · Drilling and lithologic logs; · Filter pack placement method; · Casing material; · Soil boring diameter and well casing diameter; · Screen material and design; · Sealant volume; · Casing and screen joint size; · Sealant placement method; · Type of protective cap; · Sealant materials; and · Top of casing or well cover · Surface seal design/construction. elevation (+0.01 foot); Soil Boring al~Well Construction Procedures Page 3 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Well Surveying: The elevation of the monitoring well cover or top of well casing is surveyed to an accuracy of _+0.01 foot. All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. Well Development: Well development is conducted by simple pumping if bridging of the screen does not occur. If bridging occurs, well surging is conducted for adequate well production. Well surging is created by the use of surge blocks, bailers, or pumps, whichever method is most convenient at the t~me. Only formation water is used for surging the well. Well development continues until non-turbid groundwater is produced. All purged groundwater is held on site in covered 55-gallon DOT-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received. DATA REDUCTION The data compiled from the soil borings is summarized and analyzed. A narrative summary of the soil characteristics is also presented. The logs of exploratory borings are checked for the following information: · correlation of stratigraphic units among borings; · identification of zones of potentially high hydraulic conductivity; · identification of the confining formation/layer; · indication of unusual/unpredicted geologic features (fault zones, fracture traces, facies changes, solution channels, buried stream deposits, cross-cutting structures, pinchout zones, etc.); and · continuity of petrographic features such as sorting, grain-size distribution, cementation, etc. Soil boring/well locations are plotted on a properly scaled map. If appropriate, soil stratigraphy of the site is presented in a scaled cross section. Specific features that may impact contaminant migration (e.g., fault zones or impermeable layers) are discussed .in narrative form and supplemented with graphical presentations as deemed appropriate. HOLGUIN '" ~ FAlqAN ~ & ASSOCIA'I'E~%, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 4. MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name Apex Bulk CQmqqQdities. Inc. Project Name Bakersfield Facility Site Address 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California Well No. MW-1 through MW-3 Date Completed Proposed Supervised by Mark R. Ma§ar,qee~ CHG~ RG -- WELL COVER elevation of reference point -4,500 feet above MS GROUND SURFACE TOP WELL CAP depth of surface seal 2 fb,cJ SURFACE SEAL type of surface seal Neat cement annular seal thickness 3 feet -- ANNULAR SEAL type of annular seal Cement grout 2 feet Iow permeability seal thickness Bentonite chips -- LOW PERMEABILITY SEAL type of Iow permeability seal diameter of well casing 2 inches -- WELL CASING type of well casing Schedule 40 PVC depth of top of gravel pack 7 fbg -- GRAVEL PACK type of gravel pack #3 sand iROUNDWATER depth of groundwater 18 fbg from reference point SCREEN depth of top of screen 10 fbg screen slot size 0.02 inch screen spacing size 0.5 inch depth of well 30 fb.cJ diameter of borehole 8 inches 3O fbg depth of borehole -- BOTTOM WELL CAP HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1 (661) 391-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 iXAIqAN &A$$OCIATE. S. INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 5. WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES The regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the subject site is notified 48 hours prior to sampling. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Prior to purging the monitoring wells, water level measurements are collected according to the following procedures: · All wells are checked for floating product with an acrylic bailer or oil/water interface meten · Water levels within each well are measured to an accuracy of _+0.01 foot using an electric measuring device and are referenced to the surveyed datum (well cover or top of casing). · All wells are monitored within a short time interval on the same day to obtain accurate measurements of the potentiometric surface. · All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. PURGING PROCEDURES The monitoring wells are purged using either a submersible electric pump, bailer, hand pump, or bladder pump. A surge block is used if it becomes apparent during pumping that the well screen has become bridged with sediment or the produced groundwater is overly turbid. During the purging process, groundwater is monitored constantly for temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, odor, and color. These parameters are recorded on a water sample log. Purging continues until all stagnant water within the wells is replaced by fresh formation water, as indicated by removal of a minimum number of well volumes and/or stabilization of the above outlined parameters. Purge water is stored on site in 55-gallon Department of Transportation-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received from the laboratory, or the water is treated and disposed of on site. If permanent pumps are installed in the wells for groundwater remediation, the pumps are operated for at least 24 hours before sampling to ensure adequate purging. Well Purging and Gr~ltdwater Sampling Procedures Page 2 SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURES Measurements collected in the field before sampling include water level, pH, conductivity, temperature, and turbidity (all in conformance with the Environmental Protection Agency's publication "A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods"). Sampling is performed after the well recharges to at least ~ percent of hydrostatic water level. After purging and adequate recharge, groundwater samples are collected as follows: · A l-liter TeflonTM bailer is lowered and partially submerged into the well water to collect a groundwater sample. · For volatile organic analyses, groundwater samples are collected in chilled, 40-milliliter, VOA vials with TeflonTM-lined caps. Hydrochloric acid preservative is added to all vials by the laboratory to lower sample pH to 2. Samples are held at a temperature of 4°C while in the field and in transit to the laboratory. Other appropriate containers, preservatives, and holding protocols are used for non-volatile analyses. HOLGUIN ~ 'FAHAN ~ & ASSOCIATI~'S, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OONStJLTANTg ATTACHMENT 6. WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INVESTIGATIONS SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION Site Address: :2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California Name of Business Occupying Site: Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Owner Contact: Mr. Randy Gale Owner Tel. #: (800) 767-3401 CRWQCB-CVR Contact: Mr. John Whiting Tel. #: (559) 445-5504 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND GOALS OF THIS INVESTIGATION: Drill three monitoring wells to a depth of 30 fbg to assess diesel hydrocarbons in groundwater. KNOWN HAZARDS AT THE SITE INCLUDE: Diesel hydrocarbons KEY PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES: NAMI~ RESPONSIBILITIES Bradley C. Skenfield SITE SAFETY OFFICER - Primarily responsible for site safety, response operations, and protection of the public. Responsible for work site inspections to identify particular hazards and define (661) 391-0517 site security. Mark R. Magargee, CHG, RG PROJECT MANAGER Primarily responsible for site characterization. The project manager delineates authority, coordinates activities and functions, and directs activities (661) 391-05 17 related to mitigative efforts of cleanup contractors. Bradley C. Skenfield SITE INVESTIGATIVE PERSONNEL- Responsible for actual field work including sampling, monitoring, equipment use, and other (661) 391-0517 related tasks as defined by the project manager. ANTICIPATED WEATHER CONDITIONS FOR THIS AREA DURING THE PROJECT'S DURATION WILL BE: Temp. range: 60-80°F Humidity: 30-60% Ambient temp.: 70°F Potential for heat stress: High: Medium: Low: X ANTICIPATED PROTECTION LEVEL DURING. THIS PROJECT* Level "D" *Will be upgraded or downgraded to fit situations as they arise. EMERGENCY INFORMATION: All emergency calls: 911 Closest hospital with emergency room: Mercy Southwest Hospital ~100 Old River Road, Bakersfield, California, (661) 663-6000 Map Showing Route from Site to Hospital Attached? Yes: X No: WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE INVESTIGATIONS This document outlines Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) worker health and safety plan for its employees to be used at California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Central valley region (CRWQCB-CVR) UST site investigations. Site-specific information is provided on the cover page to this document. This worker health and safety plan was developed by HFA's industrial hygienist through consultation of the following documents: · Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1910 - "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, Final Ruling," March 1989; · NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities," October 1985; and · HFA's Corporate Health and Safety Program. This worker health and safety plan is divided into the following categories: Job Hazard Assessment; 2. Exposure Monitoring Plan; 3. Personal Protective Equipment; 4. Work Zones and Security Measures; 5. Decontamination and Disposal; 6. Employee Training; and 7. Emergency Procedures. 1. JOB HAZARD ASSESSMENT Immediate tasks at any leaking UST site include an evaluation of any present or potential threat to public safety. Questions need to be answered regarding the dangers of significant vapor exposures and potential explosion hazards. Potential Chemical Hazards The chemical components of hydrocarbons that are the most dangerous to site workers are the volatile aromatics, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and potentially, organic lead (see Appendix 1 for Material Safety Data Sheet). Additionally, solvents such as 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 1,2-dichloroethane may also be used as cleaning solutions at service stations. The primary health risks associated with each of these chemicals are described below. ? ', ~orker Health and Safety Plan Page 2 Benzene - Suspected human carcinogen. A TLV of 10 ppm or 30 mg/m3 has been assigned to benzene. Benzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 1.4 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to benzene can cause irritation to the eyes, nose, and respiratory system; headache, and nausea. Toluene - A TLV OF 100 ppm or 375 mg/m3 has been assigned to toluene. Toluene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2.1 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to toluene can cause fatigue, weakness, confusion, and euphoria. Ethylbenzene - A TLV of 11~0 ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to ethylbenzene. Ethylbenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 2 ppm. Low-level inhalation exposure to ethylbenzene can cause irritation to the eyes and mucous membranes. Xylene - A TLV or 1E:O ppm or 435 mg/m3 has been assigned to xylene. No Iow odor threshold limit has been established for xylene. Low-level inhalation exposure to xylene can cause dizziness, excitement, and drowsiness. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene A TLV of ~ ppm or 306 mg/m3 has been assigned to 1,2-dichlorobenzene. 1,2-dichlorobenzene has a Iow odor threshold limit of 4.0 ppm. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, and drowsiness. It may cause skin irritation. 1,2-Dichloroethane- A TLV of 2[]0 ppm. No data is available concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause coughing, dizziness, drowsiness, and skin irritation. Tetraethyl Lead - A TLV of 0.1 mg/m3 has been assigned to tetraethyl lead. Tetraethyl lead is a colorless or red-dyed liquid at atmospheric conditions. No data is available concerning odor threshold. Acute vapor exposure can cause insomnia, delirium, coma, and skin irritation. Potential Physical Hazards Excavation - Dangerously high fuel vapor levels will be monitored using an LEL meter. The presence of underground utilities are also of concern, and Underground Service Alert will be notified in advance of any excavation work for identification of all underground utilities in the immediate area. Drilling - Dangerously high fuel vapor levels will be monitored using an LEL meter. The presence of underground utilities are also of concern, and Un.derground Service Alert will be notified in advance of any drilling work for identification of all underground utilities in the immediate area. '- ' ~orker Health and Safety Plan Page 3 Sampling- Use of personal protective equipment will minimize the potential for exposure of personnel conducting site investigation activities. Heat stress will be monitored by each individual and controlled through regular work breaks as outlined in the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' TLV's for heat stress conditions. 2. EXPOSURE MONITORING PLAN Potential exposure hazards found at UST sites primarily include toxic airborne vapors from leaking USTs. The most dangerous airborne vapor likely to be encountered during a UST investigation is benzene. Hydrocarbon vapor concentration levels will .be monitored in the breathing zone with a PID calibrated to benzene. When the action level of 150 ppm (one half the TLV of gasoline) is detected in the breathing zone, respiratory protection will be required utilizing full-face or half-face respirators with organic vapor cartridges. Monitoring for combustible gases will also be performed using an LEL meter when vapor concentrations above 2,000 ppm are detected with the PID. The action level is 35 percent of the LEL for gasoline vapors or 4,500 ppm. If this level is attained or exceeded, the work party will be IMMEDIATELY withdrawn. 3. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT The level of protection during the site investigation will usually be level "D." Level "D" protective equipment includes coveralls, safety boots, safety glasses, gloves, and hard hats if drilling or trenching operations are in progress. Upgrading the protection level would be based on airborne benzene concentration levels equal to or exceeding the action level, An upgrade to level "C" protection would be required if tl~e action level is equaled or exceeded. Additional equipment required for level "C" would be a full-face or half-face air purifying canister-equipped respirator and TyvekTM suits with taped arm and leg seals. If the action level is met or exceeded (35 percent) for the LFL, work will cease until the vapor level is measured to be below 20 percent of the LEU A fire extinguisher will be maintained on site. Decisions for workers' safety are based on a continual evaluation of existing or changing conditions. Health and Safety Plan Page 4 4. WORK ZONES AND SECURITY MEASURES To facilitate a minimum exposure to dangerous toxic vapors and/or physical hazards, only authorized persons will be allowed on the job site. Work zones will be defined by HFA staff who will also be responsible for maintaining security within these zones. Only the minimum number of personnel necessary for the UST investigation will be present in the work zone. 5. DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL HFA's standard operating procedures establish practices that minimize contact with potentially contaminated materials. Decontamination procedures are utilized if there is suspected or known contamination of equipment, supplies, instruments or any personnel surfaces. Soap and water will be utilized to remove contaminants from personnel surfaces as well as equipment and instruments. Contaminated wash water will be disposed of in accordance with procedures outlined in the CRWQCB-CVR LUFT guidance document. 6. EMPLOYEE TRAINING All HFA employees working on the site will have had, at a minimum, the required 40-hour OSHA Training for Hazardous Waste Site Activities (29 CFR 1910, 120), which includes training in the use of personal protective equipment. Individualized respirator fit testing is required of all HFA employees working at the site. 7. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES HFA employees are trained in emergency first aid, and emergency first aid provisions will be brought to the site. In the event of overt personnel exposure (i.e., skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion), the victim will be transported to and treated at the closest hospital (see Hospital Map). · ~ Health and Safety Plan Page 5 STATE HIGHWAY SAN FRANCISCO w n-' ~ LU .,~ uJ ~ BAKERSFIELD ~ - '" n-- 0 i.~ o~ ROSEDALE HIGHWAY BURR STREET~ N~-~I~ SITE LOCATIO STOCKDALE HIGHWAY BRICYN LANEJ -/ ~ ~ APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. o ~ MERCY SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL 2111 BRICYN LANE _~ 400 OLD RIVER ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA rr ~j BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MAP o (661 ) 663-6000 HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX 1. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Material Safety Data Sheet Page i of 8 I. CHEMI~ PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDILWTIFICATION DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 pRODucT NUMBER(S): CPS2700~O CPS272102 CPS272152 CPS272185 CPS275060 COItPAI~ IDENTIFICATION EKERGENCY TELEPHONE NUNI]ERS Chevron USA Products Company HEALTH (24 hr)~ (800)231-0623 or Environmental, Safety, and Health (510)231-0623 (International) ,.575 Market St., Room 2900 TRANSPORTATION (24 hr): ~REC · San Francisco, CA 94105-2856 (800)424-9300 or (202)483-7616 ~PRODUCT INFORMATION: (800)L"~-5823 MSDS Requests (510' -5357 Technical 2. COMPOSITION/IN'FOP,/ "ON ON INGREDIENTS CONPOSITIONCOMNKNT: All the components of this material are on the Toxic Substances Control Act Chemical Substances Inventory. The proportion compositions are given to allow for the various ranges of the components present in the whole product and may not equal 100%. 100.0 % DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 CONTAINING COMPONENTS ANOUNT LINIT/QTY AGENCY/TYPE DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 Chemical Name: FUELS, DIESEL, NO. 2 CAS68476346 100.0% liDS DISTILLATE, MIDDLE Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, HYDRODESULFURIZED MIDDLE Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSD$ Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable P~ep~red accolding to the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFK 191C.1200} and the ANSI MSD$ Standard (z400.1) by the Toxico]o§y and Health Risk Assessment Uni[0 CRTC0 P.O. Box ~05~, Richmond, CA 9480~ DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 .~. Page 2 of · CAS64742809 GAS OIL, LIGHT Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, STRAIGHT RUN MIDDLE CAS6¢741442 , KEROSENE Chemical Name: KEROSINE CAS8008206 HYDROSULFURIZED KEROSINE Chemical Name: KEROSINE, HYDRODESULFURIZED CAS64742810 CAT CRACKED DISTILLATE, LIGHT Chemical Name: DISTILLATES, LIGHT CATALYTIC CRACKED CAS64741599 TLV - Threshold Limit Value TWA - Time Weighted Average 'STEL - Short-term Exposure Limit TPQ - Threshold Planning Quantity RQ - Reportable Quantity CPS - cusA Product Code CC - Chevron Chemical Company -..CAS - Chemical Abst~act Service Number 3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Pale yellow liquid. - COMBUSTIBLE - ~L ORFATAL IF SWALLOI,~ED - CAN ENTER LUNGS AND CAUSE DAMAGE - CAUSES SKIN IRRITATION - CANCER HAZARD - PROLONGED OR REPEATED SKIN CONTACT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF.SKIN CANCER - KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS EYE: This substance is not expected to cause prolonged or significant eye irritation. SKIN: This substance is a moderate skin irritant so contact with the skin could cause prolonged (days) injury to the affected area. The degree of injury will depend on the amount of material that gets on the skin and the speed and thoroughness of the first aid treatment. If absorbed through the skin, this substance is considered practically non-toxic to internal organs. INGESTION: Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 HSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable '.DIESL'~ FUEL NO. 2 ~ A Page 3 of 8 If swallowed, this substance is considered practically non-toxic to internal organs. Because of the low viscosity of this substance, it can directly enter the lungs if it is swallowed (this is called aspiration). This can occur during the act of swallowing or when vomiting the substance. Once in the lungs, the substance is very difficult to remove and can cause severe injury to the lungs and death. INHALATION: Prolonged breathing of vapors can cause central nervous system effects. This hazard evaluation is based on data from similar materials. SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE: SKIN: May include pain or a feeling of heat, discoloration, swelling, and blistering. INHALATION: Central nervous system effects may include one or more of following: headache, dizziness, loss of appetite, weakness and loss of coordi'nation. C~RCINO~EHICITY: This product contains a mixture of petroleum hydrocarbons called middle distillates (which means they boil between approXimately 350F and 700¥). Because of this broad description, many products are considered middle distillates yet they are produced by a variety of different petroleum refining processes. Toxicology data developed on some middle distillates found that they caused positive responses in some mutagenicity tests and caused skin cancer when repeatedly applied to'mice over,their lifetime. This product may contain some middle distillates found to cause those ~dverse effects. -4. FIRST AID HEASURES No first aid procedures are required. However, as a precaution flush eyes with fresh water for 15 minutes. Remove contact lenses if worn. SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing. Wash skin thoroughly with soap and Water. See a doctor if any signs or symptoms described in this document occur. Discard contaminated non-waterproof shoes and boots. Wash contaminated clothing. INGESTION: If swallowed, give water or milk to drink and telephone for medical advice. DO NOT make person vomit unless directed to do so by medical personnel..If medical advice cannot be obtained, then take the person and product container to the nearest medical emergency treatment center or hospital. INHALATION: If any signs or symptoms as described in this document occur, move the person to fresh air. If any of these effects continue, see a doctor. NOTE TO PHYSICIANS: Ingestion of this product or subsequent vomiting can result in aspiration of light hydrocarbon liquid which can cause pneumonitis. Revision Number:_34 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL NO.' R A Page 5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLAMMABLE PROPERTI ES FLASH POINT: (P-M) 125F (52C) Min. AUTOIGNITION: NDA FLAMMABILITY LIMITS (% by volume in air): Lower: 0.6 Upper: 4.7 EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: CO2, Dry Chemical, Foam and Water Fog. NFPA RATINGS:. Health 0; F'lammab~lity 2; Reactivity 0. FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Liquid evaporates and forms vapor (fumes) which can catch fire and burn with explosive violence. Invisible vapor spreads easily and can be set on fire by many sources such as pilot lights, welding equipment, and electrical motors and switches. Fire hazard is greater as liquid temperature rises above 85 F. For fires involving this material, do not enter any enclosed or confined fire space without proper protective equipment. This may include self-contained breathing apparatus to protect against tile hazardous effects of normal products of combustion or oxygen deficiency. Read the ,entire document. COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Normal combustion forms carbon dioxide and water vapor; incomplete combustion can produce carbon monoxide. '6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES C~[]DtTREC ID~RGENCYNUi~ER (24 hr): (800)424-9300 or-(202)483-7616 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES: Eliminate all sources of ignition in vicinity of spill 6r released vapor. Clean up small spills using appropriate techniques such as sorbent materials or pumping. Where feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Follow prescribed procedures for r~porting and responding to larger releases. This material is considered to be a water pollutant and releases of this product should be prevented from contaminating soil and water, and from entering drainage and sewer systems. U.S.A. regulations require reporting spills of this material that could reach any surface waters. The toll free number for the U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center is (800) 424-8802. 7. HANDLING AND STORAGE HANDLING AND STORAGE: ' DO NOT USE OR STORE near flame, sparks or hot surfaces. USE ONLY IN WELL VENTILATED AREA. Keep container closed. Revision Number/ 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 l/SDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable '.DIES£L FUEL NO. 2 Page 5 of 8 DO NOT weld, heat or drill container. Replace cap or bung. Emptied container still contains hazardous or explosive vapor or liquid. CAUTIONI Do not use pressure to empty drum or drum may rupture with explosive force. WARNING! Not for use as portable heater or appl.iance fuel. Toxic fumes may accumulate and cause death. 8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION P£RSONA~ PROTECTIV££QUIPHKNT E~£/FACK PROTECTION: No special eye protection is usually necessary. SKIN P~I~: Avoid contact with skin or clothing. Skin contact should ~ minimized by wearing protective clothing including gloves. ~SPI~RY P~ION: No s~cial respiratory protection is nomally required., However, if o~rating conditions create high air,me concentrations, the use of an ~pproved respirator is reco~ended. ~GI~ING ~LS: ,~se this material only in well ventilated areas. 9. PHYSICAL ~ND C-~MICAL PROPERTIES PHYSICAl, DESCRIPTION: Pale yellow liquid. pH: NDA VAPOR PRESSURE: 0o04 PSIA @ 40C VAPOR DF2qSITY (AIR=l): NDA BOILING POINT: 176 - 370C (348-698F) FREEZING POINT: NDA MELTING POINT: NA ' SOLUBILITY: Soluble in hydrocarbon solvents; insoluble in water. SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 0.84 @ 15.6/15.6C (Typical) DENSITY: NDA VISCOSITY: 1.9 cSt @ 40C (Miff.) 10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: NDA. CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable. CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Revision Number;ii Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL NO. 2 ~ Page 6 of.'8 No data available. ~ INCOMPATIBILITY NITH OTHER MATERIALS: Hay react with strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates, nitrates, peroxides, etc. "' ~ HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Polymerization will not occur. 11 . TOX I COLOG I CAL I NFORMAT I ON EYE EFFECTS: Minimal effects clearing, in less than 24 hours. SKIN EFFECTS: Moderate irritation at 72 hours. (Moderate erythema). ACUTE ORAL EFFECTS: The oral LD50 in rats is > 5 mi/kg. ACUTE INHALATION EFFECTS: ~he 4-hour inhalation LC50 in rats is greater than 5 mg/1. ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORMATION: The data above is obtained from studies sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute (APl). Whole diesel engine exhaust vas revieved by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in their Monograph 46 (1989). Evidence for causing cancer vas considered sufficient in animals and limited in humans. IARC placed diesel exhaust in category 2A, considering it probably carcinogenic to humans. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH~ has recommended that vhole diesel exhaust be regarded as potentially causing cancer. This recommendation was based on test results, showing increased iung cancer in laboratory animals exposed to vhole diesel exhaust. The 'excess risk of cancer for people exposed to diesel exhaust has'not been determined as studies on exposed workers have been inconclusive. It is recommended that exposure to diesel exhaust be minimized to reduce the potential cancer risk. 12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION ECOTOXlCIT¥: No data.available. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE: No data available. 13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS: Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable '.DIESE~, FUEL NO. 2 Page 7 of 8 Place contaminated mater-rals in disposable containers pose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations. Contact local environmental or health authorities for approved disposal of this material. 14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or appropriate Dangerous Goods Regulations, for additional description requirements (e.g., technical name) and mode-specific or quantityZspecific shipping requirements. DOT SHIPPING NAME: GAS OIL DOT HAZARD.CLASS: COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID DOT IDF_2/TIFICATIONNUMBER: UN1202 DOT PACKING GROUP: II1 REGULATORY INFORMATION SARA 311 CATEGORIES: 1. Immediate (Acute) Health Ekfects: YES 2. Delayed (Chronic) Health Effects: YES ..... 3. Fire Hazard: YES 4. Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: NO 5. Reactivity Hazard: NO RI~GULATORY LISTS SEARCHED: 01~SARA 313 ll-NJ RTK 21-TSCASect 4(e) 02=MASS RTK 12=CERCLA~02.4 22=TSCASect $(a)(e)(f) 03=NTP Carcinogen 13=MN RTK 23=TSCA Sect 6 04=CA Prop 65-Carcin 1A=ACGIHTWA 24=TSCASect 12(b) 05=CA Prop 65-Repro Tox 15=ACGIH STEL 25=TSCASect 8(a) 06=IARC Group 1 16=ACGIH Calc TLV 26-TSCA Sect 8(d) 07=IARC Group 2A 17=OSHA TWA 28=Canadian WHMIS 08-IAR~ Group 2B 18=OSHA STEL 2S-OSHA CEILING 09-SARA 302/304 19-Chevron TWA 30=Chevron STEL 10-PA RTK 20=EPA Carcinogen The following components of this mate[ial are found on the regulatory lists indicated. KEROSINE is found on lists: 02,10,11, 16. OTHER INFORMATION NFPA RATINGS: Health O; Flammability 2; Reactivity O; (Least-O, Slight-l, Moderate-2, High-3, Extreme-4). These values are Revision Number: 1~ Revision Date: 04/01/93 HSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable DIESEL FUEL HO. 2 ,--~ ~.~ Page 8 of.'8 obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations prepared by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association (for HMIS ratings). REVISION STATEMENT: , This revision updates Section 1 (Product Identification) and revises the MSDS to comply with the ANS1Z400.1 Standard. The above information is based on the data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as of the date hereof. Since this information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and with which ye say be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent to the date hereof say suggest modification of the information, ye do not assume any responsibil- ity for the results of its use. This information is furnished upon condition that the person receiving it shall make his own determination of the suitability of the material for his particular purpose. Revision Number: 14 Revision Date: 04/01/93 MSDS Number: 000525 NDA - No Data Available NA - Not Applicable California, RegionalcentralWatervalleyQUalitYRegion Control Board Winston H. Hickox Fresno Branch Office Gray Davis Secretaryfi)r Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/~rwqcb5 Governor Environmental 3614 East Ashlan Avenue~ Fresno, California 93726 Protection Phone (559) 445-5116 ° FAX (559) 445-5910 18 December 2000 %:q'~P/'~O~.,~ ~¢'t7~ ,, ~p~ RWQCB Case No. 5T15000820 Mr. Randy Gale Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 93308 UNDERGROUND TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY In a letter dated 28 November 2000, the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) referred the subject case to our agency for regulatory oversight. It also provided us with information that indicates diesel fuel leaked at the subject facility and degraded soil and groundwater. The extent of soils impacted by diesel fuel has been approximately determined. Corrective action has been implemented to remove impacted soils. Petroleum constituents were detected in groundwater in the remedial excavation. It will be necessary for you to determine the extent of groundwater contamination caused by the leak. Background Information The CBFD provided copies of two reporl~s- the Preliminary Site Assessment Report For Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Bakersfield Terminal and Remedial Action Report For Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. Bakersfield Terminal 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California, dated 12 September 2000. Your consultant, Holguin, Fahan & Associates (HFA), prepared both reports. The site formerly utilized onel2, 000-gallon diesel UST and one fuel dispenser island. The site' is approximately one-half mile north of the Kern River. Depth to unconfined groundwater is approximately 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the west-northwest. The diesel UST, dispenser and associated'piping were removed by BC Enterprises, Bakersfield under the supervision of the CBFD on January 22, 1999. Soil samples were. collected from approximately 2 feet and 6 feet beneath the center and both ends of the UST invert (14 and 18 feet bgs). Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg, parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end of the UST. Benzene concentrations of 0.4 mg/kg or less, toluene and ethylbenzene concentrations less than 7 mg/kg and total xYlene concentrations less than 35 mg/kg were detected in these samples. Methyl tert-buyl ether (MTBE) was detected at concentrations less than 0.6 mg/kg. Petroleum constituent analysis was by EPA method 8020. TPH-g was not detected in soil samples collected beneath the center and eastern end of the UST with one exception (TPH-g <25 mg/kg). Benzene and MTBE were not detected in these samples. California Environmental Protection Agency ~r~ Recycled Paper Mr. Randy Gale - 2 - 18 December 2000 Reports Summary The CBFD directed in a letter dated 30 March 1999 that you conduct preliminary assessment of the 'extent of impacted soils and assess the potential for impact to groundwater. A work plan for preliminary assessment was submitted by HFA on 30 June 1999 and was approved by the CBFD in a letter dated 8 July 1999. The proposed assessment was implemented on 4 August 1999. Four soil borings were advanced by HFA to a maximum depth of 20 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 18 feet bgs. Soils in the boreholds were logged as predominantly sand, silty sand and sandy silt with a silty/clayey silt strata present from approximately 10 to 15 feet bgs in two boreholes. Based on the field and laboratory data, diesel range hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples Collected from near the western end of the former UST and north of the former UST to 17 feet bgs. TPH-d up to 30,000 mg/kg and benzene up t6 0.56 mg/kg ~ere detec{ed. The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined to the southwest and approximately to the south of the former UST. Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed in each soil boring. TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples. The highest concentration was detected in B-3, located in the assumed downgradient position. HFA recommended that the most highly saturated soils be excavated and disposed of offsite and that three monitoring wells be installed to determine presence and extent of diesel range hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater beneath the site. The BCFD requested that the soils most saturated with petroleum be excavated and that confirmation samples be collected from the excavation and analyzed for total petroleum hydrpcarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), TPH-d, benzene, toluene, ethylbenze'ne and xylenes (BTEX), and for the fuel oxygenates tert- butyl alcohol (TBA), MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) and for 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB). The excavation of approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of. 18 feet bgs was performed by BC Enterprises, Bakersfield on 7 August through 10 August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soils, except in the central area of the eastern wall and the eastern half of the northern wall, based on field observations and soil sample analytical results. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 rog/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of the eastern wall. A concentration of 530 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of 280,000 gg/L and a benzene concentration of 9.4 gg/L were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation. The fuel oxygenates TBA, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE and TAME and 1,2-DCA and EDB were not detected by EPA method 8260. Following corrective action HFA again recommended installation and sampling of at least three monitoring wells to a depth of 30 feet bgs with screened intervals from 10 to 30 feet bgs. U:\UGTODW_filesklDW_draftsXApex Bulk Comm 1st Ltr.doc Mr. Randy Gale - 3 - 18 December 2000 ,Comments Based on review of the above-summarized reports, we have the following comments: The UST system and the most highly impacted soils have been removed from the site. Removal of these sources should greatly reduce further impact on groundwater quality. TPH-d and benzene have been detected in groundwater in the vicinity of the former USTs. Extent of petroleum constituents in groundwater has not been defined. Iffvestigation to determine the extent and concentration of petroleum constituents in groundwater is required prior to consideration of the site for closure. Work Plan Request Prior to 1 Febri~ary 2001, please have your consultant provi~ie a brief work plan addendum to 'assess petroleum hydrocarbon impacts to groundwater beneath the site. We require the installation of at least three monitoring wells. The combined content of the work plan addendum and the February 28; 2000 Work Plan for Further Subsurface Investigation, in general, should comply with the enclosed Tri- Regional Board 'Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage Tank Sites and Appendix A-Reports Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage Tank Sites. The work plan shall also include a sampling andanalysis plan for groundwater. The sampling and analysis plan is to include, at a minimum, rational for sampling and analysis frequency, sample preservation methods, laboratory quality assurance/quality control procedures, proposed detection limits, analytical methods and a list-of analytes for those methods. All potential COCs will be included in the initial analysis. The potential.COCs are to initially include, at a minimum, TPH-d, TPH-g, BTEX, 1,2-DCA, EDB, total lead, MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE, and TBA. The sampling plan may propose that future analyses for the COCs be . performed by different methods than the initial analyses, or that certain analyses be discontinued once the presence or absence of potential COCs have been confirmed. The initial sampling is to include analytical methods that clearly demonstrate the presence or absence of potential COCs. In addition to the COCs, we require that you sample groundwater for general minerals, nitrate, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) during two nonconsecutive quarterly sampling events (minimum of six months between sampling events). It is not necessary to sample all monitoring wells for these constituents during these sampling events; a minimum of three wells, including at least one upgradient well, should be sufficient. The work plan should include a time schedule to implement the plan and submit reports. All submittals should contain the signature and seal of a California registered engineer, certified engineering geologist, or registered geologist who is responsible for the content of the submittal. Identification of Other Responsible Party Notification If you have evidence to support identification of other potentially responsible parties for degradation at this site, we request that you identify them now by providing such evidence so they may be notified of the potential responsibility. Evidence should include the beginning and ending dates and type of involvement, the names and current addresses of all potentially responsible parties, and copies of any documents that would verify the terms and conditions of involvement. U:\UGT~JDW_filesUDW_drafts\Apex Bulk Corem 1st Ltr.doc Mr. Randy Gale - 4 - 18 December 2000 Cleanup Fund Notice You should be aware of legislation to assist owners and operators of underground tanks. Senator Keene's Senate Bill 2004 (Cleanup Fund Program) offers several forms of assistance for investigation and cleanup of Underground tank discharges. You may want to contact the State Water Resources Control Board at (800) 813-3863 about the Cleanup Fund Program. An application for and information on the Cleanup Fund Program is enclosed. If you have not already applied for the Cleanup Fund Program, we strongly urge that you do. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund's Successful Correct~ve Action, A Tank Owner's Guide. The guide contains information on choosing a consultant and obtaining a good bid (three bids are required to be eligible for reimbursement under the Clea.nup Fund Program). Also, staff administering the Cleanup Fund Program have indicated that all costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of Article 11, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations (Article 11). For your convenience, a copy of Article 11 is enclosed. Landowner Notification Our records indicate that you are the "primary or active" responsible party for the subject site. Under the new "landowner notification" of Health and Safety Code, Section 25299.37.2 (copy enclosed), all current record owners of fee title to the site are required to be notified of your proposed actions relating to investigation, cleanup, and closure of this site. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (559) 445-5504. Assoc. Engineering Geologist RG No. 5951 Enclosures: Tri-Regional Board Staff RecommendationsfOr Preliminary Evaluation and Investigation of Underground Storage Tank Sites Appendix A-Reports Successful Corrective Action, A Tank Owners Guide Cleanup Fund Application Article 11, Health and Safety Code cc w/o enclosures': Mr. Howard Wines 1/I, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakersfiel-'F'd'° Ms. Sandy Gill, SWRCB, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Mark Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Bakersfield U:\UGTUDW_filesUDW_drafts\Apex Bulk Comm 1st Ltr. doc D November 28, 2000 Mr. John Whiting, R.G. Regional Water Quality Control Board 3614 East Ashlan Avenue FIRE CHIEF ROr~ FROZE Fresno Ca 93726 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H' Street RE: Groundwater Case Referral to RWQCB Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 Apex Bulk Commodities FAX (805) 395-1349 21 1 1 BricYn Lane SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H" Street Dear Mr. Whiting: Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3941 FAX (805) 395-1349 Enclosed herewith, please find document copies pertaining to the UST removal subsequent investigation whereby petroleum impact to PREVENTION SERVICES 1715 Chester Ave. groundwater (including Benzene) has been confirmed. Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (805) 326-3951 FAX (805) 326-0576 The maximum Benzene concentration detected is 9.4 micrograms per liter ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES at a depth to groundwater of 36 feet below grade. No MTBE or other 1715 Chester Ave. oxygenates were detected using EPA methods 8015(m), 602 and 8260. Bakersfield CA 93301 7OICE (805) 326-3979 The former UST, as well as 1500 cubic yards of significantly petroleum FAX (805) 3264)578 impacted soil, have been removed from the vadose zone. TRAINING DIVISION 5842 victor Ave. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 661-326-3979. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (805) 399-4697 FAX (805) 399-5763 Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Materials Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/dm enclosures cc: M. Magargee, HFA J. Fuller, Apex Bulk Commodities HOLG-UIN, FAHAN & ASb'DC 'I'ES, INC. "~'~' ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS October 30, 2000 Mr. Howard H. Wines, III ' City of Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division 1715 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, California 93301 Subject: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT FOR APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. BAKERSFIELD TERMINAL, 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA (BFDESD PERMIT #BR-0247) Dear Mr. Wines: This report presents the results of remedial actions performed by Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. (HFA) at the above-referenced site. The excavation and soil and .groundwater sampling activities were performed in association with the discovery of diesel-containing soil and groundwater beneath the former UST at the site. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 2111 Bricyn Lane in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The site Is located within the commercial/industrial district, which flanks Rosedale Highway (State Highway 58). The site is at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography is relatively fiat with a slight slope to the west-southwest. The site is located within the southeastern quarter of the northwestern quarter of Section 26, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, MDBM. Formerly located at the property were one 12,00Ggallon diesel UST and a single dispenser. Subsequent to the removal of the diesel UST and dispenser, a diesel AST was constructed at the site (see Figure 2 - Plot Plan). The property owner contact Is Mr. Randy Gale, Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc., 12531 Violet Road, Adelanto,. California, 92301, (800) 767-3401 ext. 2102. The consultant contact is Mr. Mark R. Magargee, Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc., 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, California, 93308, (661) 391-0517. ENVIRONMENTAL: SCIENTISTS * GEOLOGISTS * ENGINEERS Contaminated Sites Assessments · Phase 1 Audits * Site Remediation · Hazard Waste Management 143 South Figueroa Street 5940 Lakeshore Drive 2820 Pegasus Drive. Suite I 3001 South 35th Street, Suite c-I 1 Ventura, California 93001 Cypress. California 90630 Bakersfield, California 93308 Pheonix, Arizona 85034 (805) 652-02t9 (714) 236-1741 (661) 391-0517 (800) 789-0219 · (602) 426-1000 (805) 652-0793 FAx (714} 236-1745 (661) 391-0826 FAX (602) 426-0113 FAX lnternet: firsLlast@hfa.com Internet: first_last@bra, corn lntemet: first_last@hfa.corn lntemet: first_last@hfa.com ] HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III F;'.,~ BFDESD & ASSOCIATF_~, INC. October 30, 2000 - Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS BACKGROUND PREVIOUS WORK On January 22, 1999, the UST was removed by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, under Permit #BR-0247 with the Bakersfield Fire Department Environmental Services Division (BFDESD). Soil samples were collected from 2 and 6 feet beneath the western end, center, and eastern end of the invert of the diesel UST, respectively. Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from beneath the western (turbine) end of the diesel UST (see Attachment 1 for a summary of previous work). 'Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, the BFDESD, in its letter dated March 30, 1999, requested a preliminary site assessment to determine the vertical and lateral limits of diesel-containing soils and assess the potential for the release to impact groundwater resources. HFA prepared a work plan dated June 30, 1999, to perform the requested work, which was subsequently approved for implementation by the BFDESD, in its letter dated July 8, 1999. HFA performed the drilling and sampling on August 4, 1999, Four soil borings (B-1 through B-4) were drilled during this phase of soil investigation. Because groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 18 fbg in each soil boring, the soil borings were installed as temporary well points, and HydropunchTM-type groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring, Significant adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil samples collected from soil boring B-1 to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, and in the downgradient soil boring B-3 in the capillary fringe soils immediately above groundwater, Minor adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the near-surface soil samples collected from upgradient soil boring B-4. Adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from Soil boring B-2 drilled 'through the location of the former dispenser. Trace to nondetectable, adsorbed-phase BTEX and MTBE concentrations were observed in the 14 soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis (see Attachment 1). Dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentrations in excess of the CCR Title 22 MCL were detected in the groundwater samples collected from the four temporary well points reaching a maximum dissolved-phase TPH as diesel concentration of 80,000 pg/I in the groundwater sample collected from downgradient soil boring B-3 (see Attachment 1). Based on laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples collected during the preliminary site assessment, the BFDESD requested that remedial action in the form of excavation of the most saturated "~~1 HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III F/M-I~4 ' BFDESD & ASSOCIATF_.%, lNG. October 30, 2000 - Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS hydrocarbon-containing soils beneath the former UST be performed and that soil samples be collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and analyzed for TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, BTEX, MTBE 1,2-DCA, EDB, TBA, TAME, DIPE, and ETBE. The results of the requested remedial action are presented in this report. SITE GEOLOGY The site is located at an elevation of approximately 395 feet above MSL, and the topography slopes slightly to the west-southwest (see Figure 1). The subject site is located on the eastern flank of the San Joaquin Valley and west of the southern Sierra Nevada. The surface of the San Joaquin Valley is composed primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene (1.6 million to 11,000 years ago) and Recent (11,000 years ago to the present) alluvial sediments. Beneath the alluvial sediments are older, predominantly lake-bed deposits. These lie unconformably on Mio-Pliocene marine sediments, which extend to a crystalline basement at a depth of approximately 50,000 fbg (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1965, Geologic Map of California, Bakersfield Sheet). At the subject site, surface deposits consist of Quaternary (recent) unconsolidated alluvium overlying Quaternary (Pleistocene) nonmarine sediments. Geologic deposits In the study area include Pleistocene alluvial sediments that form a homocline dipping gently to the west-southwest. The deposits are alluvium consisting of indurated and dissected fan deposits (CDMG, 1965). Surface soils are classified by the Soils Conservation Services as Kimberlina - Urban Land - Cajon Complex and are characterized as 35 percent Kimberlina fine, sandy loam with moderate permeability; 30 percent Urban land with impervious surfaces and altered fills; and 20 percent Cajon loamy sand with high permeability. SITE HYDROGEOLOGY The site is located in the southern portion of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The GreatValley is a north-south-trending valley, approximately ~4EO miles long by 50 miles wide, the southern portion of which is known as the San Joaquin Valley. Surface water and groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley are derived predominantly from the Sierra Nevada to the east and are transported by five major rivers, the closest to the site being the Kern River. The subject site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. The depth to the regional, unconfined aquifer is approximately EEl fbg, and the groundwater gradient is to the west-northwest, away from the Kern River (Kern County Water Agency (KCWA), 1998, 1997 Report on Water Conditions, Improvement District No. 4, February 1, 1998). Perched groundwater is known to be present flanking the current course of the Kern River, but is not known to extend to the site (KCWA, 2000, 1996 Water Supply Report, July 2000). I HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III F,A~-L/~ BFDESD & ,~tSSOClATF_.S, INC. October 30, 2000 - Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS REMEDIAL ACTION Because diesel-containing soils were observed to be present beneath the location of the former UST to the depth of groundwater at approximately 18 fbg, the BFDESD requested remedial action in the form of excavation to remove the most saturated .hydrocarbon-containing soils beneath the former UST. On August 7 through 10, 2000, approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil was excavated by BC Enterprises of Bakersfield, California, in and around the area of the former UST to a maximum depth of approximately 18 fbg (see Figure 3 - Plot Plan Showing Excavation Limits). Upon completion of the excavation, soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation, and a groundwater grab sample was obtained from the. water that had seeped into the base of the excavation. Upon receiving BFDESD approval, the excavation was backfilled with import material, compacted, returned to surface grade, and covered by an asphalt surface. Approximately 984 tons of the excavated soil was transported in covered, end dump trucks to SoilRem's Bakersfield facility for recycling (see Attachment 2 for the non-RCRA hazardous waste manifest). During excavation, soil samples were collected from the excavator bucket and screened for total organic vapors with a PID to determine completion of excavation. Headspace vapor analysis was performed by filling a brass sample sleeve to 50-percent capacity to produce a headspace allowing volatilization for a period of 15 minutes and protruding the.probe of the PID through the cap and into the headspace for analysis. The PID readings were recorded on a . .daily log. On August 10, 2000, one soil sample (B-7-18) was collected from the base of the excavation at a depth of 18 fbg; one soil sample (CVVW-l-18) was collected from the center of the western sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg; two soil samples (WSW-2-18 and ESW-3-18) were collected from the western and eastern halves, respectively, of the southern sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg; one soil sample (CEW-1-18) was collected from the d'enter of the eastern sidewall at a depth of 17 fbg; and two soil samples (ENW-5-18 and WNW-6-18) were collected from the eastern and western halves, respectively, of the nodhern sidewall at a depth of 18 fbg (see Figure 3 for the excavation soil sample locations). All sampling equipment was washed with a non-phosphate cleanser, pre-rinsed with tap water, and finally rinsed with deionized water prior to sampling. The soil samples were stored in 1.5-inch-diameter brass tubes, sealed with TeflonTM liners and end caps, labeled, placed in an ice chest at a temperature of less than 4°C, and transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis. Sample identification and chain-of-custody procedures were followed for the samples to ensure sample integrity and to document sample possession from the time 1 HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, FAHAN BFDESD & ASSOCIATES, INC. October 30, 2000 - Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS of collection to the ultimate destination. The sample labels identified the job number, sampler, date and time of collection, and a sample number unique to each sample. The soil samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline and TPH as diesel using EPA Method8015(M); BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8020; and 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-DCA, TAME, TBA, DIPE, and ETBE using EPA Method 8260. Adsorbed-phase TPH as diesel concentrations were detected in the soil sample collected from the eastern half of the southern sidewall. Adsorbed-phase TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes concentrations were detected in the soil sample collected from the center of the eastern sidewall (CEW-4-17) at a depth of 17 fbg and in the soil sample collected from the eastern half of the northern sidewall (ENW-5-18) at a depth of 18 fbg. Adsorbed-phase TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, and BTEX concentrations were not detected in the soil samples collected from the center' of the western sidewall (CWW-1-18), the western half of the southern sidewall (WSW-2-18), the western half of the northern sidewall, and in the sample collected from the base of the excavation (B-7-18) at a depth of 18 fbg. Additionally, adsorbed-phase benzene, MTBE, TAME, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, 1,2-dlbromoethane, and 12-DCA were not detected in the seven soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis (see Figure 3, Table 1 - Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results, and Attachment 3 for the laboratory report). HFA also collected a grab sample of the groundwater that seeped into the base of the 'excavation. The groundwater sample was analyzed for TPH as gasoline and TPH as diesel using EPA Method 8015 (M); BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 602; and 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-DCA, TAME, TBA, DIPE, and ETBE using EPA Method 8260. Dissolved-phase TPH as gasoline, TPH as diesel, and BTEX were detected in the groundwater grab sample collected from the base of the excavation. However, dissolved-phase MTBE, TAME, TBA, DIPE, ETBE, 1,2-dibromoethane, and 1,2-DCA were not detected in the groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation (see Figure 3, Table 1, and Attachment 3). Upon receiving BFDESD approval, the excavation was backfilled with the approximately i~50 cubic yards of segregated, clean overburden as well as 750 cubic yards of import material, compacted, returned to surface grade, and covered with an asphalt surface. BC Enterprises transported the approximately 984 tons of hydrocarbon-containing soils in covered, end dump trucks to SoilRem's Bakersfield facility for recycling (see Attachment 2). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the soil sampling and laboratory analytical results, diesel hydrocarbons were found to be present in the soil beneath the former UST. Subsequently, remedial action in the form of HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III F~ BFDESD ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. October 30, 2000- Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS the overexcavation of the dispensers to the depth of approximately 18 fbg was conducted. Laboratory analytical results of soil samples collected from the base, western sidewall, and the western half of the northern sidewall of the excavation did not indicate the presence of petrdeum hydrocarbons. The soil samples collected from the eastern sidewall of the excavation and the eastern halves of the northern and southern sidewalls indicated adsorbed-phase petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations remaining in the subsurface. Laboratory analytical results of a groundwater grab sample collected from the base of the excavation indicate the presence of hydrocarbon concentrations remaining in the groundwater beneath the location of the former UST. Based upon the laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected from the excavation, the vast majority of hydrocarbon-containing soils associated with the former UST at the site were excavated for off-site treatment. No additional soil remediation activities should be · required in association with the former UST. However, due to dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbons detected in the groundwater grab sample collected during current remediation activities and the results of the previous groundwater investigation at the site, the BFDESD will likely require additional assessment of the extent of hydrocarbon-containing groundwater. RECOMMENDATIONS HFA recommends that an expanded groundwater investigation be conducted consisting of the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells (see Figure 3 for the proposed monitoring well locations). The wells should be drilled to a depth of approximately 30 fbg (12 feet below the groundwater surface) and installed with ~ feet of slotted PVC casing. The monitoring wells will be constructed with 2-inch-diameter PVC casing and the appropriate filter pack sand installed from the bottom of the soil boring to 3 feet above the slotted interval. Blank PVC casing packed in neat cement grout will extend from the surface downward to the 3-foot I~entonite seal placed above the filter pack. Locking, water-tight well covers will be set in concrete to protect and secure the wellheads (see Attachment 4 for the soil boring and monitoring well construction procedures and Attachment 5 for the monitoring well construction details). Following installation, the monitoring wells will be developed by surging and bailing to remove drilling residues and to produce Iow-turbidity groundwater. Prior to sampling, the proposed monitoring wells will be purged w'flh a pre-cleaned bailer in order to remove stagnant water in the wells. During purging, key parameters including temperature, conductivity, and pH will be measured with a portable electronic meter and recorded. The purging will continue until the monitored parameters stabilize (usually after 3 casing volumes of groundwater have been & AS$OCIATF_~, INC. October 30, 2000- Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS removed). Following purging, groundwater samples will be collected with pre-cleaned TeflonTM bailers and discharged with a non-aerating, bottom-emptying device into sterilized glass containers, capped with TeflonTM septa, labeled, and chilled in an ice chest for transport. The proposed monitoring wells will be surveyed relative to a permanent structure, and from a designated point on the northern side of the top of the well casing, the groundwater level will be measured in the wells to an accuracy of +_0.01 foot. The groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH as gasoline and TPH as diesel using EPA Method 1~]15 (M) with an MRL of ,50 pg/I and 'BTEX and MTBE using EPA Method 8[]20 with an MRL of 0.5 pg/I (see Attachment 6 for the well purging and groundwater sampling procedures). Holguin, Fahan & AssoCiates, Inc., trusts that you will find this Remedial Action Report to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Mark Magargee at (661) 391-0517 or at e-mail address Mark_Magargee@hfa.com. Respectfully submitted, Bradley C. Skenfield ~,-~ Mark R~-~l~gargee, CHG, RGb'- /~ Environmental Technician Senior Hydrogeologist Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. Holguln, Fahan & Associates, Inc. /kjm:rri Enclosures: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Plot Plan Figure 3 Plot Plan Showing Excavation Limits Table I Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Attachment 1 Summary of Previous Work Attachment 2 Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste Manifest i, Attachment 3 Laboratory Report Attachment 4 Soil Boring and Monitoring Well Construction Procedures Attachment 5 Monitoring Well Construction Details Attachment 6 Well Purging and Groundwater Sampling Procedures cc: Mr. Randy Gale, APEX Bulk Commodities, Inc. Mr. John Noonan, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (5) ~ HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, BFDESD ~ FAHAN ~ October 30, 2000 - Page ~ & ASSOCIATE~, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ...-~, o.~?., '-o 1 ' o /z-' ."'//"'"' ...... I1 ".Oil Sum · ' ,,.":-'~'"" 22 oo;t, :" .... Oi¥ Sump o ~! I' ' ]:;! . 0 o "It LOC ' .'Landc~ % ' ~OIL I~== Mile 21 .' X Oil Tan~ LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 0.5 1 MILE j~ O 0 1.O00 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 FEET llq] BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 0 0.5 I KILOMETER USGS OILDALE 7.5 MINU1E SERIES OUAORANGLE HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. HC)L(.SUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III ~ F.,4~L~N BFDESD ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. October 30, 2000- Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 70 feet EXISTING 12,000-GALLON DIESEL AST \ I~UILOIN(3 \ FORMER 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 2 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. "REVISION DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2000: RRI HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, III F.AJ-{.Aj~ BFDESD ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. October 30, 2000 - Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS MW-2 ENW-5~I 8'"... WNW-6-18 '".:, RAM P CEW-4-17 ·EW-1 MW-3 ........... ',,,, ; MW-1 '..o. cww-,-,8 \ ¢_ '",; ESW.3.18Oi %,..0 WSW-2-18 ~ " ...........~' .... UMIT OF EXCAVATION i; 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. © POST-EXCAVATION SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 2111, BRICYN LANE BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA · POST-EXCAVATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATION FIGURE 3 - PLOT PLAN SHOWING EXCAVATION -{~ PROPOSED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION LIMITS HOLGUIN, I~'AHAN & ASSOCIAT]~S, INC. REVISION DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2000: RRI HOLGUIN, Mr. Howard H. Wines, F,,'~-~t~ BFDESD ~ October 30, 2000 - Page ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS HOLGUIN, ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK 70 feet EXISTING ~'~ 12,000-GALLON DIESEL AST I B-3 ' ~ FORMER ~' \ 12,000-GALLON ~ \ DIESEL UST ~ ~ b-1 ...... ~tk-lC \ \ ~' 'li~m.~ ~'(-~CONCRETE BRICYN LANE 0 20 40 LEGEND APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. · SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 21 11 BRICYN LANE ~ SOIL BORING BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 1 - PLOT PLAN HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISION DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999: RRI TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR TANK REMOVAL APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA DATE TPH AS ETHYL- TOTAL MTBE I REF SAMPLE SOURCE SAMPLED DEPTH SAMPLE ID DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES (fbg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (rog/kg) (mg/kg)l EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (U) 8020 I N/A REPORTING LIMIT 10' 0.005 0.005 0.005l 0.0051 0.02! N/A Western End of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST / 1-22-99 14 TK-1W-14 9,800 0.1 2.6 31___. 12 0.21 A 1-22-99 18 -- TK-1W-18 -17,000i -0.39 6.8' 61 33 0.581 A Center of 12,000-Gallon Diesel UST 1-22-99 14 TK-1C-14 ND~ ND _ ND __0.0068 0.026 NDI A 1-22-99 18 TK-1C-18 24 ND ND ND 0.013 NDI A 1-22-99 18 TK-1E-18 ND NDNDt NDND .NDI. A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated February 25, 1999. TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR DRILLING APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA SAMPLE', DATE I I SAMPLE TPH ASI ETHYL- TOTAL SOURCE'SAMPLEDi DEPTH ID DIESEL BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES MTBE REF ~ ! (fbg) [ (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) i (mg/kg) EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD I 8015 (M) 8020 N/A REPORTING LIMIT I 10 0.005 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.02 N/A I 8-4-99 5 B-1-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A l 8-4-99 10 B-1-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A ! 8-4-99 15 B'1-15 2,600 0.0061 0.031 0.86 1.1 ND A. , 8-4-99 ~. 1~0 B-2-10 ND ND ND ND ND ND A ~ 8-4-99 15 B-2-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND A B-3 l 8-4-99 5 B-3-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND A I~ 8-4-99 I 10 B-3-10 ~ ND ND ND ND ND ND A i 8-4-99 ~ 15 B-3-15 2,900 0.012 0.04 1.5 ND A / 8-4-99 17 B-3-17 30,000 0.56 13 35 71 0.074 A B-4[ 8-4-99 5 B-4-5 170 ND 0.0094 0.0221 0.12 ND A J_ 8-4-99 10 B-4-10 12i ND ND ND ND ND A r~ 8-4-99 15 B-4-15 NDI ND ND NDI ND ND A I 8-4-99 17 B-4-17 ND ND ND ND ND ND A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. ND = Not detected. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24, 1999. TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS APEX BULK COMMODITIES, BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA FLOATING SAMPLE i DATE DEPTH TO PRODUCT SOURCE i SAMPLED GROUNDWATER THICKNESS TPH AS DIESEL REF I (fbg) (feet) (tJg/I) (feet-MSL) i EPA ANALYTICAL METHOD 8015 (M) N/A CCR TITLE 22 MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL 100 N/A MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT 50 N/A B-1 I 8-4-99 -18 0.00 1,500 A B-2 8-4-99 ~ 18 0.00 800 A B-3 I 8-4-99 -18 0.00 80,000 A B-4 8-4-99 ~ 18 0.00 1,400 A REF = Report reference. N/A = Not applicable. A = Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s, report dated September 24. 1999. HOLGUIN, -~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 2. NON-RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST NON-HAZARDOUS ~. ~e~e~to~s US~EPA ~D, No, ~ P.ge ~ ' WASTE MANIFEST , ,..,, 1296 3. Ge~ra~s N~a~ ~~ ~ . 5. T~ 1 ~y ~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A. T~e~s ~ .~ lC.~/, 0 0.o.°.~.t>. s.~O g'~f - '1%</s~ 7. O. US E~ ID Nu~r ie. T~t% ~ Tr~.er 2 ~m~y N~ 9. ~O~t~F~~e~ 10. .-/US EPA ID Nu~r lC. F~I~P~ -~~~ I ........... I ~~ 11. W~te Shipping ~me a~ ~fl~ 12. ~n~m 13. 14 T°~I No. T~ I ~. ~.. ~"~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIIRCATION: I certify the materials described above o~ this manifest am no{ subject to ledeml prope~ disposal of Hazardous Waste.. Printed/Typed Name Momh Day Year ..... I~1/.'/lOC N.me ..~ pt Of Materials L~:~~~ ~ year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement'of Receipt of Materials PfintecVTyped Name Signature I · [ · I 'M~' Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest exoept Is noted in Item 19. .: Prlnted~ryped Name I Signature Mon~ Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Genarator'a U~ EPA ID No. Manifest Doc. No. 2. Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST ~ ~. ~. O. ~.. I. :~ 129 7 4. Generator's Phone ( 6. US EPA ID Number A. Trarmporter's Phone 5. T r,a. nspo~er, 1 Oompan~ame / I ['" J'~' ' ' ! 7. Transporter 2 Compa.~y I~ame 8. US EPAJD Number B. Tra,"~tx~er'$ Phone I ..... 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US'EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phol~a 11. Waste Shipping Name arid Description 12. Contalnars 13. Total No. J Type Quantity I a. . / .~, ,./ b. ¢. 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~fy the materials described above on this manifest are nm subject to federa/rej~atlons for reporting proper dispoeal o~ H&audoue Waste. '~ J Signature ~ ~ .~__'/~" m. ~ Day Year .. .. / 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Matmtals ./ , Monlh D~y 18. Transporter ~ Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materiele . Printed/Typed Name j',, ./,-~,:' ,,~L.,.'/~..' ~ ~ Year 19. Discrapanoy Indication Space 20. Facilily Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials oovered by this manifest em~pt as noted in Item 19. ..,. Printed/Typed Name J Signature Mon~ Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generator's UC~ EPA ID No. WASTE MANIFEST r:.(:s. 1298 ' . .... ' ~ .. .'C.) '1.. 4. Generator's Phone ( ,,' e I ) '~, "~. ' 5. Transporter 1,. Company Name 6 US EPA , .~ "~ ~ ~,~ '~ , ID Number A. Transportar'$ Phone (:-.. ,.//. ,. /'" .',,~; .~.. , , 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transporter"$ 9. Designated Facility Name and 5ire Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Oontalners 13. 14. · Quant~y . .~ b. D. Additional Descrtption~ for Matedals Listed Above I E. Handling C, odes for W~es Ustad Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and A~litional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I certify the materials described above no t~ls manifest am not subject to federal reg~,t~)~8 fro' r~)oding pr(~ cllspceaJ ~ H~ Waste. ," - ,~.~ ' ., ~' .- i I ~ /~.~' ~ ' ..... ' ....... ~'.".'" ' _/ I---~;.z.-...~ .~-- --- i°. ~l I 5'1 ~. ~; 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials , . .~~ " Month Day Year P~ted/Typed Name /t ~... ,.-~,..-,~.? i:?-.~'1/- 18. Transporler 2 Acknowledgement ol Receipt o! Materials 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facilily Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name [ Sigll~ltUre Mon~ Day Y~' GENERATOR~S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. (~l~eratoce LIS EPA lO No. ~ No. WASTE M^.,~EST ~. ~.~. 0.'.:~. ~. ~. ~/O.~.~1 ·/'~ ~ '~ 1299 5. Tm~r ~ ~ny Na~ 6. US EPA ID Numar 7. Tra~er 2 ~pany Name 8. US EPA ID Nu~r B. T~effs Ph~ 9. ~signat~ Fa~l~ Na~ and Site Addre~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. F~II~s Phone 11. W=ste Shining Na~ end ~d~ 12. ~nem 13. To~l Qu~ , '.. '. ( ~,4 ~' ./~ ~-~ ~ !i ' .,. D. Additional Descriptions for MateHals Usted Above E. Handling Codes for Wast~ Listed 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are ~.~_subject to federal reg~,u.~or; for reporting proper di~ of Hazardo~ Waste. :~ .'" "/~" ~:),---'- I .~'..'?" '~-.*;,-~ .... 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Prinfed/Typed Name Signature' · Mo~h Day Year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Na~,,~,~,//,- .! I Signature , MonthDayYear 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Fadlily Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except es noted In Item 19. ? Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's US EPA ID No. 2. Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST /~.C/,) C) ;:-. j .~.'~.O.Z.~" 1300 3. Ganeratol's Name and Mailing ;~ / I I /';.,r ~ ¥..,, t... ~, 4. Ganerator'sPhone( ~t ) )~ ~__ 7/"/ ( 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transporter'$ Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Nan)e 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transportef's Phone I~, Daslgnated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number t 1. Waste Shlpping Name am:l [~rlption ~. Cont~'~m ~$. Tota~ a. ?'/~ /.~..~,.,. , ~, ~.;,/.,~ ,.. ~:; / '~'/ ...9,~. b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above J E. Handling Codes f~ Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instrucflofls and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: i ce~lify the materials described above o~ this manifest am not subject to federal regulaM, o,~ for repo~ng proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. Pdnted/TypedNa,.me " .//..."/ ,~ ~m Day Year 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of F it of Materials Printed/Typed Name J Signatum~ ~ _ ... ~ Day /' ( J "'~-'~' t... 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgemenl of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name/ I Signature Monlh Day Year /V'" /',x:" J . . . 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name J Signature Mon~ Day' GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS Generator's U~ EPA ID NO. ~Manifest Doc. No. Page 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transpo~ter's Phone ?. Trar~oorter ~ Company Name ~. ~S EP~,IO Nom~r B. Tra~spo~ter'~, .Phone ~. D~lgnelod Fe~l~/Nem~ end S~e A~re~ 10. US EPA ID Nurr~or C. Fa~l~ Phone 12. Contalnem 13. 14. 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description Total I Unit No. [ Type Quantity JWt/Vol a. b. ¢. 15. Special Handling Instructions and ~1 Information -, / 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I ce~lfy the materials described above o~ this manifest am not subject to federal regulaflotm f~' reporting proper dlaposal of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name Signature ' ; "' ('" / c:-'-' )I/ 1Acknowledg_el~ent of Receipt of Materials i/~:i~~ ~~/? :~,-' , ! , Name ,::.": J _. , ~. natur ,.. ': 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials 1 g. Disompancy Indie~lton 20. Fa~lity Owne~ or Operelon C~rtificalion el r~ip! el ~asle meleflel~ m~er~:l by ll~i~ mtmilas! ~p! as n~led I~ Ilem ~g. Printed/Typed Name / S!;nature GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generator's U..CJ EPA ,DNo.ll"an"'al ~..o. 1302 3. Generator's Name and Mailing Addreas ,/*,~, / . . ~ 5. Transporler 1 Company Name 6_~ US EPA ID Number '" "." :."' ' I,~. · . ,, :'.",, " ' ~.,. .", ... 5 ¢ ~' "/'."-/'~ 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Tnmsporter'e Phone 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address :' 10. US EPA ID Number C. Fadllty'$ Phone Total No. TI~ Ou~ty ].~. ... ~,'. ...: ~ , . . d. ': '":: D. Additional DeecripUon$ for Materials Li~ted Above E. Handling Codas for Wl~stas ~ Above 1 $. ~al I-~ndling In~tn.~ions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICA'nON: I certify ~he materials descdtmd ~3ove on thi~ manl~est are no~ m~Je~ to federal regulatlo~ for reporting proper dlspomd of ~ Waste. · ' ,.. r~:,,.., -~ . ./~-..::,- .- ..... ', °. -', I. ,.). 17. Transport I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials .../ / Printed/'Typed Name .,,~'2 ,~/' .,/~' I Signature /. M~th Day -.>::*' "//_ _:,.'.//z': ' ""-> ./ .... ~.'-- I'" :~1 z "1 '"'- · Printed/Typed Name I Signature Mo~th Day Ye~ ' '~-'/'"- I ~'~'. , I'1' 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Y~ ] GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Germratof$ LP~ EPA ID No. ~,~'~lfest D~c, No. 2. Page 1 5. Tmne~er 1 ~ny N~ 6. US EPA IO Nu~r ~ T~e~s ~ ~. 7. Trane.er 2 C~ny NB~ . 8. US EPA ID ~ B. T~Re~e P~e To~l No. ~ Ty~ Qu~ I b. c. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~fy ~e materials de~olbed above Pfinte~ Name / 17. Trans~er 1 A~n~edgemen/of R~ipt of Mated~s " pdpte~ Name 18. Trans~der 2 Acknowledgement of Re~ipt of Materials P~t~d Nem8 19. Di~repan~ Indi~tion Spa~ 20. Facility Owne~' Or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except a~ noted In Item Printed/Typed Name I Signature Month Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY · ~( ) 5. Tm~r 1 ~mpany N~ 6. US EPA ID Numar Tmns~Refs P~ 7. Tmn~fler 2 ~mpany Name 8. US EPA ID Numar T~e~ P~ne g. ~Ngnat~ Facili~ Na~ ~d S~e A~ress :. 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Fa~l~'s P~e 11. Waste Shipping Name a~ ~flpUon 12. ~n~ine~ 13. To~ 8. C. 15. ~ H~ling In~ ~ A~ Info~n 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper dlspo~d of Hazardous Waste. 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name " I Signature .~/ Mo~{h Day of Receipt o! Materials -- 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item t9. Printed~y,ped Name . / Signature Month Day Year GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. (~nerator's us EPA ID No. 2. Page 1 4. GeneratoesPhone( ~.( / ) ? ~ - _ "7/'/ ¥ 5. Transpo~ler~,. ,1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number , A. Transp<xter's. Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Name;i,,,,-4/'" 18' .... US EPA,,a~, ;/fiD Number .... B. Transporter's/../ Phone//.? 9. [~signafod~,,~~ ~1~ ~l~~Facility Name and Site Addm~ 10. US EPA ID Number C. Fa~ffity's Pho~ 11. Waste Shippin~ Name and ~o~cription 1~. Containe~ 13. ~ 14. Total I Unit No. ITYPe Qu~.~ /WWol a. b. C. ~. ~ddiUonl~ l~:fiption~ lot Maleflal~ L~tod Above E. Htmdllng Ood~ f~ W~ 15. Special Handling Instructions and Add~ Information iL..//' 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on mis manifest am not subiect to federal regu~aifons for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. PdntedHyped Name i ) ::.~__ Mo~th Day Year j' .,.- ./ ," . ..' := :':'~. 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials / 'j/ I "~ -?* ~ .-" 18. Transporter 2 o gemant f Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name ~-' Signature __ &fon~ Day , ./. ~. ./~.. ' /.~,..,~/'/ 19. Discrepancy Indicatio~ Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste mateH'als covered by this manifest except as noted tn Item 19. , Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature MonU~ Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator'. U-S EPA ID No. Manifest Doc. No. WASTE MANIFEST. ".'-.' . . '," 1306 3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address ~f/'~'~' ~' W~ ~/, '': C~' ? g..~.:,/, ~., ~ ,,t ~ "~ . V ,- I.. /:,, L.' ,':/ <: '~. 4. Ge~e~a~o~ P~o~e ( / ~'. I ) "; '-" "i - 7 / :! '.., .... 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6i~ US EPA ID Number A. Tra~spolter's Phone r,~..,,..... I",.~ ,. ., ' I ~ ;~,.~c:,c~o ~_ ~' ~',~ %. ~ ~ l-. './,:, ~/~. 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID/~mber B. Trar~porter"s Phone · ."~' /. I .... ~. ~../'. .... ,L,/,.. 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's PhOne 11. Waste Shipping Name and Oesc~tption 12. Co~talnere Total13' Unit14' I No. Type Quantity WtNOf · /"' .- ~" / ?., ;'.. · ./-,.IL. ", t:,,~' t',.~ 't. ~. .... ' ~ ' ~" ' I D. Additional [~.q~ription$ for Matod~ls Ustod Abo¥o E..~,~ ~s,or ~ ~ ~ I ! 15. Special Handling Instmctiorm and Additlom~ Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials dascdbed above on this manifest are n;g~subJect to federal regulaUon~ for reporting profit ~ of ~ Waste. Printed/Typed Na~me (- I SIg~qtu ~,~,,-'/~ ~' ×~" Month Day Year · ' ~ "7~--~' ",.- /,.' t / .- ~::(' ransporter 1 Receipt of Materials · ,~, ., ..... Name _~T-~' ~nat~lre ,' rt'~,--'-/' .'// I Mo~, Day Y.~.e~r "' .... ~","- I~."---;" '"..' ~kz...k L!.._.,:~, ~'---:-___ I~- !'1 / vi ::''~' t 8. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name f\' ..../ ' I Signature Iv, onu~ Day Year t 9. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name ~ Signature Month Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. G~er~toCa U~ EPA ID No. I Manifest Doc. No. Page t N ? WASTE MANIFEST E. ~.L. c,.O.'~. '.; 'V' ~' ~:I [. / .7 [ ,o, ' 13 5. Trencher 1 ~ny N~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A. T~Ae¢8 Pho~ , / ... ..~,' ...... >~.. . .: . 7. Trens~Aer 2 ~mpany Name 8. US EPA ID Nu~r B. T~e¢s P~ne ..- ,./ I .... ~ ../,' .-- ~. ~signat~ Fa~li~ Name and S~e Addm~ 10. US EPA ID Nu~r C. F~l~s Ph~e No T ~ /" !' / ~//. . .. t. { - . . -, . ) .' ~ . .~, · . b. c. D. ~diU~ ~Kdp~ons for Mate~s ~t~ ~ve I E. ~dli~ ~ for WW~ ~ ~ 15. S~l ~11~ Inst~ ~ ~ Inf~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: i ce~y the maten~a~ described above on thla manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting ~ dlspoMI Of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name I Slgnature//~ '" Monih Day Year "I "' : Ir";, ~,1/-'/I.~-., 17. Transporter I Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials --. ' . -' . . . I -:...-:':':? >' L '- .,,,>.__':' .' . -, ----------.--.-,..~ ,; 18. Transporlar 2 Acknowledgement of Recelpl of MalarJals ,/ ...,. _x-/' I Month Day Year Prin,ed/TypedName .... /.. Signature '~' ./ I I I 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by Ibis manifesl except as noted in ~ 19, Printed/Typed Name Ls~.~tum ~ Day ' Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY WASTE MANIFEST C/' ~ ~ ',? "~ · . .-~ /.. ~.. .If.7.~ ,oft 3. Genera,o. Nm e.~ ~ai,ln0 ~ ~ ~' ... ~ ~ ~ ( ~ (~ '-~-"~.~. ~ 5. Transfer 1 ~pany Na~ 6. US EPA ID Numar Tmn~Re(s 7. Tran~er 2 ~mpany Name 8. US EPA ID Numar B. 9. Designat~ Facili~ Name a~ Site Addra~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Faclll~s P~ 11. Waste Shining Name and ~dp~on 12. ~inem 13. To~l a. ., /,, ...... ,.. ~-./ .-~ . . · ,. b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Ustdd Above E. Ha~lling Codes for Waste~ ~ Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Inionnation 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above o~ this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name / I Signatur ~:?.. ..~ Month Day Year " .,'. ,'. I ,-? 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name ~ I Signature Month Day Year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials PdntedFl'yped Name '~ ,// ." I Signature ,.'~-" /... Month Day 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facilily Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by Ibis manifest except I~ noted in Item 1~. Printed/Typed Name { S~grts. tura Mo~l~ ~ Day Year i 1 GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Ge~emto~', U~ EPA ID No, 2. Page.1 1309 WASTE MANIFEST C.A. ~. O. ~.~. I. ~.~/.O. 2. ~, H ~ 5, Tr~er 1 ~ny ~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A, T~e~ P~ 7. Tr~er 2 ~m~ny Na~ 8. US EPA ID Numar B. T~e(~ ~ g. ~signal~ F~cil~ N~ ~d'Site A~re~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. F~I~ P~ To~ I Un~ ~ b. c. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above o~ this manifest are not subject to federal r~'u~atlons for reporting proper dispoaal of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name ( /. ) Slgnatum.-'~ / ~. Day Year · ' .... , ' ."/" ~, ..z . .( ~ , :) ...... ,.. ..,~... .- '"" .'--- ':' ' ~ 7. Transporter ~ Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Roceipt of Matorial~ · - · Pdnted/Typed Name 'Signature ~/.i Month Day YearI 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by Ibis manifest except as noted in Item 19. Pflnted~yped Name ~ Signature Mon~ Day YJ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE UANIFESTC,,. ~.. a,~. ~-~ t. ~.m,.,~~ I.t. ~.~., ~o, ~ 1310 tl (. , · 3. ~erato~sNa~a~li~~ .:. , f'~;~l ~, ~ ,~..~,,,.~ /l , . , x/It I" ,~., I, I.,: S. Trans~r 1 ~,y N~ 6. US EP~ ID Numar A. T~s ~o~ 7. Trans~der 2 ~mpany Na~ 8. US EPA ID Nom~r1~. T~e(s Ph~e 9. ~slgnal~ Facili~ Name a~ Site A~mss ' 10. US EPA ID Numar . Fa~liys P~ne To~ ~o. ' " I/,, , &, ...., ,. _ .... ~ ~ ,~ ~ i ~ - ' . . . . . . . . O. A~ifi~l ~pti~s for Matefl~s Us~ ~ve E. H~II~ 15. ~al Handling I~ ~ ~ Info~fion 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described ~bove on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporang proper ~ of HaZardous Waste. " ..'.~.' ,-..' 0,- ~ ./,':.-.~ /'i:. ' ......~' ': .:.,' /.v .-..., Printed/Typed Name '" I Signature.-' '%~.,-~-~,,___., Month Day Year d I "':~ ? .... '" t" *'. I' ~.! i';' 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name Signature . Moth Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted In Item 19. PdnledH~yped Name / Signature Mo~lh Day yea~l GENERATOR'S COPY 4. Generato~sPh~e( /'.,,' / ) )1 i.~ 5. Trencher 1 ~ny Name 6. US EPA ID Nu~ A. T~ffe~s P~ 7. Tr~s~er 2 ~ny Name 8. US EPA ID Numar B. Tmn~ees P~e 9. ~sig~t~ Facili~ Name and Site Addre~ 10. US EPA ID Nu~r C. Fa~liys Ph~o 8. O. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the mated~ls described above on thi~ manifest are not sub}ect to federal regi~latlo~m for repo~ng proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. Sigr)ature .. -, ~ . ~'' Printed/Typad Name (, ~ r''~'' ) I / "~" ' Monlh Day Year Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials . '"'"" Da" .'1 ""' Name ~ $ nature - [': j"'~"'~-'-- · ... ~ ~ "-, ;-~ ~ ~ ', ,'\ t ~ ~ ' j t',,.....; ..,... ~.~,~:.:.,~. t. ~ .~. '" ' ...... .::J, :t' I/'/-".- 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name . I Signature ,, Mo~th Day Year ' "'"'"'" , " '" I I I 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Pdnted~'yped Name J Signature Month Day GENERATOR'S COPY 3. Ge~rato(s Na~ ~ Maili~ ~ 5. Tran~er 1 ~ny Name 6. US EPA ID N~ A. T~s P~ne 7. Tmn~aer 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID N~ B. T~aete P~ Designat~ Facili~ Name ~d Site Addre~ : 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Fa~llys Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and De~dpfl~ ~n~lnem 13. To~ Quanti~ b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above J E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to f~:~ral regulaUons for mpo~ng proper dispceal of Hazardous Wast~. Printed/Typed Name ..~ ,. ~ Mon~ Day Year 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement ol Receipt o! Materials Printedrryhed Name z /' .,/''~-m~ ]Signature.;.,,/ // . Mo~ Day Year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials .. · Printed/Typed Name J S'g e J ~ Cay 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted In Item 19. Pdnted/'I'Br~:~ Name I Signatura Mon~ O~y GENERATOR's COPY 1313 WASTE MANIFEST ' '""~ :":~ 3. Generetor'sNameandMallingAddreas /,., '. ,. ,, l~. ~,~)1 ,,,~.1 4. GeneratoPs Phone ( 5. Transpo~er 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transporter's Phone · ..., .. .,' . . . ,-,.. ,'/ . .. ~,' 7. Transpo~er 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID ~Jumber B, Trensporte~s Phone .... '" '/ I .... ?'//'~ .... ~ /'''' 9. Designated Facllib/Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C, Faclllly's Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Contair~ers 13. Total a. ! ':' " "' / "' / ' ' b. c. O. Additional Dasc~ptions for Materials Usted Above E. Handling Codas for Wastes Ustad Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additioaal Information / I- /f 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ceftin/th~ materials described above on this manifest are ~ to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardoue Waste. Printed/Typed Name ..... I SIgnatur~,-~''/ ,/;? .i'*'" ~. Month Day Year ..' .= , / I ('t,.' ',"' /' ~-" ' ' 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement df Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name Signature Mo~th 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name I Signature ;, Month Day Year .J,- t 9. Discrepancy Indicalion Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: CertificetJon of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generators U~ EPA ID NO. WASTE MANIFEST .:. .: t 1314 3. ~mt~8 Na~ a~ ~iling A~re~ 4. Genomto~aP~( ~.~t"/ ) ? D ~' - .,,' r /",' 5, Tm~er 1 ~pany Name 6,, US EPA ID Numar ~ T~efs Ph~e 7. Tran~o~er 2 Com~ny Name . 8. US EPA ~D Numar B. T~eFs P~e /'~ /I:' I · · . L~.,/~'. .... /C,,// 9. ~sig~t~ Facili~ Name and Site A~re~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Fadl~s P~ne 1 i. W~t~ ~hippin~ ~amo and ~fiption 1~. ~n~lno~ ~. No. ~ T~ Ou~ / a. b. } ltl. 8~1H~lin~ ln~t~ ~ ~ ln~on 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I certify the materials described ~bove cm this manifest am not subject to federal regul~tk~s Io~ reporting proper dl~! of Hazmdous Weste. I Signature /.'~' ~ ~lm~ Day Year Printed/Typed Name '/' '" ~,, -'~: .... ' -','"'" ........ l."::,': I/.':' I ,,',,..- 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials I - ~e Day Printed/Typ.e~? Name,,. ./ " ' '! "" '~/' //' Signature//,, I,...!"1/~1.:.:. 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted In Item 19. Printed/'~'yped Name 1 Signature Mon~ Day Ye~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generators U,~ EPAID No.I IManlfast Doc. NO. 2. Pa(~e 1 1315 WASTE MANIFEST C. ~.(. ~ , ,, .~. I .~ .L~.,..~. *~. ... 3. Generator's Name and Mailing Addreas/'} t*.,., i [ (". 5. Tran~porler I Co~l~ny Name 6. US EPA ID Number .... ... ..... '... '-.i ~., ~I' /~ . 7. Tm~rter 2 C~l~ny Name 8. US EPA iD Numl~r 9. Dasignat~d Facilily Name and Site Addre~ 10. US EPA IO Numl~r C. Faclliys Ph~e TOI~I No.T~ Q~ I I I I ., // . ~ ~..J>. 15. ~al H~ing Inst~ ~ ~11nfo~fion 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I <=edify the mated~ls described above o~ this manifest ere not subject to fede~ regulations for repo~ttng proper dlepo~aJ of Hazardous Waste. , [ SIgnatu. re~ .. '~" Mon~ Day Year Printedfryped Name 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name Signatu ~_~z~ Monfft Day ye~' ,18. Transporter 2 Acknowtedgement of Receipt o! Materials · Printed/Typed Name I Signature __ Mc~h Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner oT Operator: Ceditication ol receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Pdnted/Tyl~ Name I Signatura Monlh Day Year GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's U~ EPA ID No, 2 Pagp. 1 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transporter's Phone 7. Transpofler2CompanyName 8. US ET !D Number B. Transporter'~.;hone 9. Designated Facility Nam and Site Address ~' 10. U~ EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containers 13. ] 14. Total Unit No ol · Quantity a. ¢, 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certtly the materials described above o~ this manifest am not subject to federal regulatl(ms for reporting proper dtsp<l~ll Of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name /':"*" *m Mon~ Day Year ':" ""' " IO. of ReCeipt of Materials ;'~ / "'.' .' Month Day Year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name [ Signature Month Day Yem' ~ 9. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted In Item 19. Printed/Typed Name 1 Signature Mo~ Oay ¥~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's UR EPA ID No. 5. Trencher 1 C~pany N~ 6. US EPA ID Num~ A. Tm~e~s Phone 7. T~er 2 Company N~e 8. US EPAID Num~ B. T~fle~s Pho~ 9. ~signat~ Facili~ Na~ and Site A~m~ ~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Fa~l~'s Phone I ........... 11. Waste Shining Name and ~fipfl~ 12. ~l~m 13. 14. Total No. T~ O~ a. b. c. D. ~diti~l ~dp~s for Materials Us~ ~e E. ~ling ~ for W~as ~ ~ 15. ~al Ha~ling Inst~ ~ ~1 Info~ation 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~ily lbo maten~als described above on ~hls manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name ~./'/ · / Mon/h Day Year t 8. Trensl~rter 2 Acknowledgemenl o! Receil)l et Malefials ., 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manitast except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name Signature Monm Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's US EPA ID No. .Tlvlanlfest 2. Page 1 5. Transfer 1 ~ N~ 6;~ U8 EPA ID Numar A. T~e P~ 7. T~er 2 C~any Name 8. US EPA)D Numar B. T~s~Ae¢~e 9. ~signat~ Facili~ Name and Site Addr~s 2 10. U8 EPA ID Num~ O, Fa~l~'~Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and ~dp~n 12, ~ 13. I 14, Total I Un~ . Qu~ I~ 8. b. c. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest am n~ subject to federal reg~ltiO~a, lot repo~ling proper ~ of I-I~ardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name / ,,- I Signatur~.,~ /(? ./",/ Month Day Yea' ....... {.., .. I.."i~.-~.. I lt.:...-?-" .~; ~:.:~ "" !~ ¥1/.~'l':'- 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement o! Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year .. .. ....... ,-,.:-.:-.- Ic ~:1/'~ 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name I Signature / Mon~ Day ' "';- -×". "I -'~ ,,Xx' I I 1- 19. Discrepancy Indication 8pace 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name J Signature GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generator's U~ EPA ID No. 2. Page I ! 5. Trane,er I ~ny Na~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A. Transfers P~ 7. T~er 2 ~m~ Name 8. U8 EPA ID Numar Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed,,/,L., Above/~.] I E. Handling ,~C°des./,f~f°r Wastes Listed Above 15. SpeciaJ Handling Instructions ~ Additional Infon~ation 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION; I certify the materials described above o~ Ih18 manifest are not subjec~ to federal regulaflo~m for reporting proper dtapoeal of HazJrdo~s Waste. Printed/TypedName (ri /' r~, I~'~"a'~'' ~ '"'""' I"1~ TM' : · '" ,' "" '~" O. ~,' / c ~'-t" 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ..,. ~rintedrryped Name Signature .." .. ~ 8. Transporter 2 ^¢kno~ed~omon! o! ~w~oipt o! Materials · PrintedHyped Name J Signature ' -'~ ..'::"' '"'/ I' I 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certtlication of receipt of waste materials oovered by thia manifest eX--'~r ~ as nord in Item Printed/Typed Name [ S~rtalure Mo~th J3ey Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY WASTE MANIFEST (_. }, .L~. c?. '" ' :, · ,.~.2 .',. 5. Tinnier 1 ~ny N~e 6. US EPA ID Nu~r A. T~ffeds P~e 7. T~ner 2 ~mpany Name 8. US E~ ID Numar B. Tm~e~s P~e .. ~/. ..... ~ ., 9. DeNgnat~ Factli~ Na~ ~d Site A~re~ ' 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Fa~li~s Phone 11. Waste Shipping N~e and De~p~ 12. ~n~lnam 13. 14. , , < / / ~, b. . . . . c. . . . . I 15. ~al Ha~ling Instm~ ~ ~ Inf~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~fy the materials described above on Ibis manifest are not subject to federal~gulatlon~ for repofltng pro,er dt~:~al of Hazardous Waste. .. [ Signature ~ ..- /// ,~,: Month Day Year Printed/Typed Name ,~,.: .. .:' /,.. ~.r...~. I .~,! .... ,:.-'L ~ ........... t 7. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name / .... Signature~/' ~ Mo~fl Day 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name '~ . /': ' I Signature Month Day 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name l Signature Mo~h Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS f. Generator's US EPA ID No. [ Manifest Doc. No. WASTE MANIFEST ,/', ~...0!., '~...-~ ci .O.7-.."~I . 7., 132.1. 3. Generator's Name and Mailing Address 5. Tranr. porter f Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transpolar% Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transportar's Phone 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address :* 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone 11. Wasta Shipping Nama and De~fiptlon 1~. Oon~ln~ ~3. Tot~ Quantity a. , , . / t ~,,. _ .,.,. ,.. ,..:, , b. 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are no.~bjsct to federal r~ulat~m for re~=~lng pro, er clia~=eal of Hazardmm Waste. Prin, tedrryped Name / . ,,, Slgnature~'....-/ ~/,¢"' ~ ~n~ ~y Y~r ' .. / ,...../.. -/ ..rp, .... , I fl:? ,w,' R~ ,,.,o,,.a,.~.,. 11"' "~- $ig tut.. -- 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/TypedName .,,,/L-' ~ ISignature /'[" Z Mo~DayYear 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Fyi=ted Name ' t Signature Month D~ Year GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generetof, tJ~ EPA ID No. Pag~l 1322 5. Tm~er 1 ~y N~ 6. US EPA ID ~ ~ T~ees P~ 7. T~er 2 ~m~y Name 8. US EPA ID N~r B. T~es Pho~ g. ~slg~t~ Fadli~ Name and Sffe ~re~ 10. US EPA ID Nu~r C, Fadli~s P~ 11. Waste Shining Name ~ ~ption 12. ~ine~ 13. 14. To~ NO. I Ty~ Ou~ I a. 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above o~ this manifest are not subject to fe4eral regulatlo~ for reporting proper dtsix3sal of Hazardous Waste. .... r' '' ' "' '~')' ~ /'~"/ ' ":' 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Mated;ds - ,' ..,,.,.. . .... 18, Transporter 2 Ackn~3wledgement of Receipt of Materials - · Printed/Typed Name I Signature ' ' -.-'" I '"' /? ! I I- 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Pdnted/~yped Name / Signature Mone Day GENERATOR'S COPY 1323 WASTE MANIFEST ' 5. Transfer 1 ~n~ N~ 6. U8 EPA ID Numar A. Tmo~egs Pho~ ' i~ .',. :"). ~ ,, ..... 7. Transfer 2 ~mp~y Name 8. · US EPA~ Numar B. Tr~e(s P~o 9. ~sig~t~ Fa~l~ Na~ ~d S~e Address 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Failles P~ 11. W~te Sht~lng Name a~ ~p~on 12. ~lnam 13. To~l b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Usted Above I E. Handling Code~ fo~ Waste~ Usted Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Infmmation 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I ce~fy the materials ~scrlbed above on this manifest are not subject to federal regul~tl, on~ for repo~g proper dl~oosal of Hazardous Weate. Printed/Typed Name / / I Signature .~" 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ' 18. Tmnsporler 2 ~cknowledgement of Fleceipl ol Materials Printed/Typed Name . J Signature Month Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item Printed/Typed Name / Signature Month Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generator'e U~ EPA ID No. r'~anifast ~ No. 2i 1 WASTE MANIFEST I~.C-.C'.,.).~ .-/. t. . 1324 3. Generato~'s Name and Malling Address J~/~-~ ,~ . ?.,~, ] I. ~'~-~.~"~.~,:t < 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number ... 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Transpo~er's Phone /, I /,. ,'~-,-~ i .... ...... 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone 1 ~. Wasta Shipping Nama and Do~ption ~. Con~lne~ ~. Toml Ou~ty e. b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Usted Above ' ' I E. Handling Codes for Wastes listed Above I / 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: ! ce~llfy the matemm ~ above on ~la manifest are not subJecl to fedeqd?~gulat~ms for reporting proper dlsp~al of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed.,.. Name, .... ' (/ :" /X" ?~'" II Sig"~4~* *>'//,~.~, :~. c:~ ':/ ,.,, ..._.. ~_ ., -- Day 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ~atur_~. ,:;' . i ~ ." ' ...] ~. ~'~(,..i.¥",~t., i,t-. S__ \'.~.~.'~.':..~. --Day 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name ,,,,.L. ~-,,-'~,., II Signature /,'/ . taon~ Day 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/TYPed Name [ Signature Month Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generator's US EPA ID No, [ Manifest Doc. No. 2. Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST I Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number tc Transporter'$ Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B, Transporter's Phone 9, Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone t t. Waat~ Shipping Namo and De,*-~dption 1~. Gontalne~ ~$. ~4. 1 Total Unit No. Type Quantity Wt/Vol D. Additional B~'iptio~ [or Materials listed N~oYe E. Handlln~ I 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I certify the materials described above on this mantleat ate nof ~u~eof Io leclsml ~ .n~)ulallo~i fo~' reporting proper disposal of Hazerdous Waste. Printed/Typed Name ( Signatu re ~/~ ,_,~,,, ,,~= ~' *. Mo~ Day Year ,; .: ..:: .. --"~' / .&/~. '- . 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ~.' ." .... -/.v ,.~, ,, .. , 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name J' ' I Signature ~ Moth Day 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20: Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste rnetarlals covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name I Signature Monlh Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generators L~ EPA ID No. Manifest Doc. No, 2. Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST 132:6 5. Tr~er 1 ~y ~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A. T~ P~ne 7. Tr~er 2 ~y N~ 8. U8 EPA ID Numar B. T~e~ 9. ~g~t~ Fe~ll~ Name ~nd ~e ~r~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. To~l Ouan~ b. O. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above E. Handling ~ for Wastes listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify me mateda~ described ai:xwe on ~hl~ nmntfest are n~ sul~ec~ ~o fede~?reg~or~ for r~ ~.~ ~ H~ W~. ... /.~ .. ~/,~ .~.-~-. 17. Transfer I Ackno~edge~nt of R~ipt of Mate~afs / m~. / / ~8. Trans~er 2 A~nowl~gemenl of Receipt of Materials P.nt~y~d Name '~" /'-- ] Signature ~ ~ 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in item 19. Printed/Typed Name [ Signature Mon~ Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS f. Generator's U.S EPA ID No. 2~ Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST /~d,...,(.'~,~.~."~-.t..'" . .., 1327 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transporte~'s Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number B. Phone g. Deetgnafed Facility Name and Site Address :; 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containers 13. Total Quantity a. b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Ueted Above E. Handling Codes for Waste~ Meted Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: certify the materials described above on mis manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper dls~ of Hazardous Waste. pri, qted/Typed Name // / .,/~.,?,, :~: '., Mor~h Day Year 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name ~'/ '-' I Signature, ~' f' ~ Monm 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name ~;,-~-~' . '?' : I Signature ,/, Monm Day 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name I Signature Mon~ Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generator's U~ EPA ID No. 2. Page WASTE MANIFEST .4'. 07.'~'-I..~.,."~.,:~ .2 .<:~ / 1328 //, ., '/ /.. 1~/-'~* ~,.~,,~...([,.t, 5. Tra~ J ~ny Ns~ 6. US EPA 7. Tr~er 2 ~pany N~e 8. US EPA ID ~ /'"-. I ~/~ ..... ~/~- ~. ~sig~t~ Fa~Ii~ Name ~ $ite A~re~ 10. US 11. Weste Shining Name a~ D~pGon 12. ~1~ 18. J 14. To~ J Un~ 8. b. .... I D. ~ ~flpfi~s for Matefl~s ~ ~vo J E. 15. S~I Ha~li~ In~ ~ ~ Inf~n 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ~rtify the materials described above on this manifest are not sut~ect to federal r.,.~tior~ f~x re~:.lthg pr~er dl~ of Hazardous Waste. Printed/Typed Name Signatu~ ~ .~,? Monlh Day Year ·. /.- ,.. ../~-~'~'~' ~_r ..... ~-------~ ,j-~ .... ~-j../,-"j(:,..,. 17. Transporter 1 AcknowledgemenlZof Receipt of Materials Pdnted/Typed~ame ~ J Signature ./' 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · .rint.~y= Name "' 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in item 19. Printed/¥yped Name ~ A~nth D~y Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generators ~ EPA ID NO. 5. Tmn~et 1 ~ny ~ 6. US EPA ID Numar ~ T~e~s P~ne 7. Tre~er 2 ~mpany Name 8. US EPA ID ~m~r B. T~s Phone ~. ~mgnat~ Facil~ Na~ and Site Addre~ ~' 10. US EPA ID Numar ~. F~l~i ~e 11. waste Shipping N~e a~ ~ption 12. ~ine~ 13. To~ 8. b. c. 15. S~I H~i~ I~ ~ ~ lnf~fi~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCATION: I certify the materleJa descflbed ebove o~ mis manifest are not subject to federal regulatimm for rep<ming pmp~ disp4~al of ~ Waste. Printed/Typed Name J Signat .~..? ~ r Mo~mDayYear 17. Transporter I Receipt of Materials Printed/TypedName.. /' "j,,..,u.,_.. :~ '""lb':l " ''- ....... I 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name I Signature d,d~ MonlhDayYe~* 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except aa nord i~ Item 19. Printed/~yped Name [ Signature Month Day Y4~i GENERATOR'S COPY .o.-, .oous ,. ,., 1330 WASTE MANIFEST .1~.~ d.~2~' -'~, .*/-2 .~ ' lof ./ ..... ' L. ? ~ ~ ~:.. 5, Tra~er I ~y N~ 6. US EPA ID Numar A. T~ets P~ ., 7. T~er 2 ~mp~y Name 8, US EPA ID Numar B. T~d?s~e /~ '/"" " I · ~ :/A ..... ~'~,/~',~ 9. ~slgnat~ Fa~l~ Name and S,e Addre~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. Failles Phone 11. Waste Shipping Na~ a~ De~fip~on 1~ ~i~m 13. 14. ~ To~l Un, No. T~ ~ ~ ~ a, .. I . . . . /~, ./;~ ~,, ../"' 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIRCA'rtON: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for relx~ing proper dflko~al of I-I~.ardous Waste. Pdnted~'yped Name / ,/' S tur~* · . .. /. "~ ~';~ Mor~ Day Year '1 Acknowledg+ent of Receipt of Materials -._ ¢':'/' ' 'r~~ ,,, ~ ~ ..~(.. ~'~ .)~. ~ ~, ~- ,-'",_..,... --.-~(L:' "~"----~-- I:" ~' I ~'~-I ~-','. Receipt of Materials Printed/Typed Name { Signature Mo~ ~ Year ~" ...... " '":'"'/.'~': I I · I ' 1 ¢. Diecre~ncy ~ndi~tion 20. Facility,Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name / Signature Monb~ Day 1 GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's L~ EPA ID No. Doc. No. WASTE MANIFEST L)~'j .~-. ,.*~.~,..o. ~. ~-' 133.1 ,. ~.~re,o~.~.~ ~1 ~ ? )~ - ~/'~ ' ,~ U8 EPA I0 Numar. L T~eFs Pho~ 7. Trans~er 2 ~mpany Na~ 8. US EPA. ID Numar B. T~AeFa P~ne · ~/,:: I . ~/z~ ..... ~/~ 9. ~signat~ Fa~l~ Na~ a~ Site ~dre~ 10. US EPA ID Numar C. F~l~s Phone 11. Waste Shipping Name a~ ~dp~on 13. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Usted Above I E. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on t~ls manifest are not ~l~Jsct to federal reg,ul~ilkx~ lot ~ ~ ~ of Hazardous Wut~. Printed/Typed Name / / ] Signature ,~'~/ /'~ ?./." ~, Mon/h Day Year Acknowledgefnent of Receipt of Materials Name Signature / Month. Day. ,year 18. Transporter 2 PrintedfTyped Name,~/' / [ Signature /~/ ~,/~ I M°rdhlDa¥1TM lg. Discrepancy Indication 8pace 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by Ibis manifest except es noted in Item 19. Pdnted~Typed Name / Signature Mon~ Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS ~. Generator's US EPA ID No. 1Man~fest Doc. No. 2. Page 1 WASTE MANIFEST ("A'~ .~.'~.~. '.~..~,. ~.*--.'~: I · ~./.-~.= t ~, / 1332 :::'//i /. ,.-¢.- /.,. /',,:,.~: .... ~,',.:: C,. "'t'",'~o~ 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Trensport~r's Phone · " it.. (.', .-, I('./~"tO~.P-¢~:~ 2 C'<'" ',:9 '7-'1t- ~/~,'/%'- 7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EP) ID Number B. Transporter'a 9. Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phorte 11. Wasto ,~ipp~ng Name and De,~dption 1~. Gon~i~ere lota113' No. Type Quantity ia' · Additional DescripUons for Materials Us~ed Above E. Handling Codes for Wastes Usted Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional I~formaflo~ 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ce~fy the materials described above o~ thl~ manlfeat are not m~ to f .~/~ll~lulatlo~s fo~ reporting proper dl~eaal of Hazardous Waste. PltntedfT'yped Name /,' ~, I Signa~re ,.,, _,'T~ ~ // *, It~1o~1~ Day Yem' · .?:.....'.,,......, i,,.:~.: ?- z.. 6,-..,,~:- I ,.?t'.';~-.;~-~---'-" P. cfi ~. 17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ' ' / -- ' 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name 1 Signature Momh Day GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generator's U.S EPA ID No. ] Manifest Doc. No. 2. Pag~ WASTEMANIFEST ":~"~' . , '1, 1333 2ttl r".,~ ..... f.. ~,.~,:.., . 4. Genamtoes ~ ( ) 5. Tren~er 1 ~y N~ 6. US EPA ID Number A. Tm~e(s P~e 7.' Tmn~er 2 ~m~ny Name 8. US EPA ID Numar B. Tm~e(s P~na ~/"'" I . ,~/,? ..... z~/,4 9. ~g~t~ Facil~ Name and S~e ~dre~ :' 10. US EPA ID N~r C. Fa~l~s Phone 12. ~inem 13. ~ 14. ~ 11. Waste Shipping N~e ~ ~pflon , I To~ ~ Un~ ~ ,°. I, 1 ' i I ., ~.._~.~., .... , , ,._ , . :~.,.l. 2~/. b. 15. S~l Ha~ling In~m~s a~ A~o~l Infection 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal ~'egulatiorm for reporling proper dt~oo~aJ of Hazan:lous Waste. 17. Transporter t Acknowledgement,~ Recelp! of Materials Print ped Name // Signature .,~ M°nu~ Day tear 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name. ,.~. .,' , Signature ,.~/,~.. iMonthlDay]Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Pdnted/l*yped Name 1 Signature Mon~ Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS It. Generator's US EPA [DNo. Mar~lfeet Doc. No. 2. Page1 1334 -WASTE MANIFEST I ~' ~' (''' ~(~'~'" I. '~..~t.O .~ .~ l~ I 5. Tran~er 1 ~ny N~ ~. US EPA ID Nu~r ~ T~s ~ ' o.o.o.o. ~.~ .~ ~ (~ ~. 7. ,ran~de,, ~m~ny Name 8. ~Er~ ~u~r B. 9. ~ignated Facili~ Name and 8it~ Aedra~ 10. US EPA lO Nu=~r C. F~li?s ~ne II. Waste Shipping Name and ~flp~on 12. ~i~ 13. To~l Ouan~ ( ZZ ,' ,, / :/l."l- l. ' .' b. D. Additional Descriptions for Materials Usted Above E. Handling Code~ for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on Ibis manifest are no{ subject to federal regulatiens for reporting pro~r disposal of Hazardous Wa~B. Printed/Typed Name / .. / .'~ Mon~ Day 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials ' / Moth Day -.year 18. Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials · Printed/Typed Name / I Signature //./ Month Day ' .,~.. / J 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name I Signature Mo~m Day GENERATOR'S COPY 1335 ~. Tinnier 2 ~mpan~ Name & US EPA ~ Numar B. Tmns~ets~ne ~ ~. Waste Shi~in~ Name ~nd De~ption ~2. ~l~m ~. To~ b. O. Additional Oescdptions for Materials Listed Above E.I.~ Codes for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: ! cert~ the materials descdtmd above o~ this manlfem am mX ~ t~ fe~iml reguletkxts for repmling proper ~ ~ Hazm*dous Waste. .-" ~" · . ' ,~,.': ' .::'" ~ Day Year 17. Transporter 1 Acknowl~gement 6'~ Receipt of Materials N _,/.~' · / . Printed/Typed Name. ,) -- /' 'f- I Signature/~.,~, ~.~:*/~.- -. Monm Day ~ ...,..,:....,/.:_,,, ,,. ~ ,,, ,_ , -~--- ~.--,,-- ,~ ---_ Printed/Typed Name ..~...- .~.~; ' ~ Stgnsture ., ~ Monm Day Year 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by this manifest except as noted In Item 19. Printed~Typad Name ] Signature Month Day [ GENERATOR'S COPY NON-HAZARDOUS t. Generator's U~ EPA ID NO. 5. Tranepo~er I Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number A. Transporter's Phone 7. Transporter 2 Company Name / 8, US EPA ID~lumber B. Transporter¥ Phone g. Designated Facility Name and Site Address ~ 10. US EPA ID Number C. Facility's Phone ' I 11. Waste Shipping Name and Description 12. Containers 13. 14. Total · No. Type Quantity ~ ~. S~i~l H~ndling In~tru~lons and Additional In~o~'m~tion 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are no~ subject to federal regul ~atfo~ fro' reporting proper diapceal o~'H~zardou~ Waste. .~' , '"' , /'> . '~' ,,~ ~" '" ------' I'"-'!::1/-""1 '.::~:.~ ...,: ~ .. ,_,"~/: ,~:.- . ' . 17. Transporter I Acknowledgemen~of Receipt of Materials Printed/TypedName / ,, , I Signature · .,.z~_~::~ M<:mm Day year 18. lransportor 2 ^¢kno~odgement o! ~ipt o! Materiel~ · Printed/Typed Name Year //- , Signature Mo~ Day lg. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Ope~,tor: Certification of receipt of waste materials covered by lhta manlf~t except as noted in Item 19. Printed/Typed Name [ SlOnalt.l~ Month Day Y~ GENERATOR'S COPY HOLGUIN, ~'~"~'~'~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 3. LABORATORY REPORT Laboratori Inc. Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/23/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-1TB BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/2000 ~ 11:00 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/17/2000 Sample ID: TB-1 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/17/2000 Sample Matrix: Blank Water Sample Collected By: BPJ%D SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected ~g/L 0.3 Toluene None Detected ~g/L 0.3 Ethyl Benzene None Detected ~g/L 0.3 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected ~g/L 1. Total Xylenes None Detected ~g/L 0.6 Surrogate % Recovery 91. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor ' ~'~ Alt results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4100 Atlas Coud * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FA}{kN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-2 BA/~ERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: ~08/10/2000 ~ 11:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): 08/15/2000 Sample ID: EW-1 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/05/2000 Sample Matrix: Water Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) 280000. ~g/L 50000. Surrogate % Recovery Not Reportable % 34-133 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Surrogate not reportable due to sample dilution. Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this repod are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com LaboratOries, Inc. Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/23/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395~2 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/i0/2000 ~ 11:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/17/2000 Sample ID: EW-1 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/17/2000 Sample Matrix: Water Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/17/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/17/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene 9.4 ~g/L 0.3 Toluene None Detected ~g/L 0.3 Ethyl Benzene 25. ~g/L 0.3 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected ~g/L 1. Total Xylenes 93. ~g/L 0.6 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 C14) 2100. ~g/L 200. Surrogate % Recovery 92. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Chromatogram not typical of gasoline. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alterat on, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-2 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/2000 @ 11:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/21/2000 Sample ID: EW-1 Date Analyzed: 08/21/2000 Sample Matrix: Water Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected ~g/L 1. 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected ~g/L 1. t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected ~g/L 2. t-Butyl alcohol None Detected ~g/L 100. Diisopropyl ether None Detected ~g/L 2. Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected ~g/L 2. Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 113. 76-114 Toluene-d8 98. 88-110 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108. 86-115 Note: PQL's were raised due to matrix interference. California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 S~uart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Coud * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com LaboratorieS, Inc. B C LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date of Report: 08/23/2000 2820 PEGASUS Sampte Matrix: Btank Water SUITE 1 QC Batch ID: 200009395-1TB*BTX-TPH BAKERSFIELD, CA KEN MITCHELL Samples Affected: 00-09395~1TB I Method I I I I I ISPike ~"Recl Precisi°nlLCS ~ Rec I Blank I I .S IMSD ISpike I LCS I Controll Controll Controll Constituents I Readings Iunits I~ Rec I~ Rec IR.P.D.I~ Rec I Limits I Limits I Limits Ethyl Benzene I<0.3 I~a/L 1104. I100. I4. I~00. I 80-1201 101 85-~5~ Nethyt-t-butytether I < 1.0 I~a/L I104. I gg. I 5. I87. I 80-120l 101 85'115~ I I I I I I I I I MS = Matrix Spike; MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate; RPD = Relative Percent Difference LCS = Laboratory Control Sample All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * f661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com B C LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date of Report: 08/23/2000 2820 PEGASUS Sable Matrix: Water SUITE 1 QC Batch ID: 200009395-2*BTX-TPH BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 KEN MITCHELL Samples Affected: 00-09395-2 i { Method { i i i i iSpike %Reci Precision{LeS % Rec i II [ Blank I [ MS [ MSD [Spike I LCS [ Control [ Control [ Control ~ ~Constituents [ Readings [Units I% Rec I% Rec IR.P~D.]% Rec I Limits I Limits I Limits ~ [[Benzene [ < 0.3 [#9/L 1107. 1105. { 2. 1106. ] 80 - 120[ 10[ 85 - 115~ ~Toluene I < 0.3 1~9[L 1107. ]104. I 3. [104. I 80 - 1201 101 85 - 115~ ~Ethyl Benzene ] < 0.3 I~g/L 1104. [100. [ 4. 1100. I 80 - 1201 101 85 - 115[ ~Methyl-t-butylether [ < 1.0 [~9/L 1104' I 99. I 5. I 87. I 80 - 120[ 10[ 85 - 115~ ~l~m Xylenes I < 0.6 [~s/L ] 96. [101. [ 3. [102. [ 80 - 120[ 101 85 - 115~ ~o-Xylenes I < 0.3 I~a/L IllS. 1112. I 3. II10. I 80 - 1201 101 SS - 1151 ~Total Pet Hydrocarbons (gas) I <50. [~g/L I 98. ] 98. ] O. [ 97. I 80 - 120[ 10[ 85 - 115] ~ I I I I I I I I I MS = Matrix Spike; MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate; RPD = Relative Percent Difference LCS = Laboratory Control Sample All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting pady, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * f661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-3 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: .08/10/2000 ® 09:50 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): 08/15/2000 Sample ID: CWW-i-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 08/23/2000 Sample Matrix: Soll Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10. Surrogate % Recovery 72. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327~1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori Inc. pa e 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-3 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/2000 ® 09:50 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample ID: CWW-i-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 - C14) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 116. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ./~#1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, 8C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www. bclabs.com Laboratori Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-3 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/2000 @ 09:50 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: CWW-i-18 Date Analyzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0.2 Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99. 70-121 Toluene-d8 103. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 92. 74-121 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed m this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachmenl or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie lnc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-4 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:05 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date gxtracted-8015M(d): '08/15/2000 Sample ID: WSW-2-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/02/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10. Surrogate % Recovery 110. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F..T. Manual Method - Modified gPA 8015 S~uart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for lhe exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation, 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * ('661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com ! BC Laboratori ,, Inc. Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-4 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:05 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample ID: WSW~2-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics . (C5 C14) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 117. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, 8C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661~327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bctabs.com Laboratori , Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAk{AN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratox7 No.: 00-09395-4 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:05 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: WSW-2-18 Date AnalYzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0.2 Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Quality Control Data Surrogates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2oDichloroethane-d4 95. 70-121 Toluene-d8 101. 81-117 4~Bromofluorobenzene 88. 74-121 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, inc. assumes no responsibility for repod alteration, detachment or third part/interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * ('661)327-4911 * Fax{661~,327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-5 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:15 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): '08/01/2000 Sample ID: ESW-3-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/02/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) 13. mg/kg 10. Surrogate % Recovery 103. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (6611327-4911 * Fax(6611327-1918 * www.bclabs,com " Laboratoril Inc. Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE i Laboratory No.: 00-09395-5 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:15 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample ID: ESW-3-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units. Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 - C14) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 110. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor Alt results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for repod alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www. bclabs.com Laboratori , Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, F/kHA/q &ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-5 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:15 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: ESW-3-18 Date Analyzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical /%nalysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0.2 Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Quality Control Data Surrogates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97. 70-121 Toluene-d8 103. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 89. 74-121 California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-6 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ~ 10:25 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): '08/15/2000 Sample ID: CEW-4-17 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/05/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) 5400. mg/kg 2000. Surrogate % Recovery Not Reportable % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Note: Chromatogram not typical of diesel. PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Surrogate not reportable due to sample dilution. --'~ua~t G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * (661~327-4911 * Fax(661'1327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-6 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:25 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: CEW-4-17 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/22/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/22/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 *22 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 *22 Ethyl Benzene 0.10 mg/kg 0.005 '22 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 *22 Total Xylenes 0.093 mg/kg 0.01 *22 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 - C14) 87. mg/kg 50. Surrogate % Recovery 34. % 70-130 *20 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method ~ Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Chromatogram not typical of gasoline. Flag Explanations: *20 = Surrogate is low due to matrix interference. Interference verified through second extraction/analysis. *22 = Associated surrogate recovery is low. Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-6 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:25 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMb~ODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: CEW-4-17 Date Analyzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 4. Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95. 70-121 Toluene-d8 103. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96. 74-121 Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentrations of hydrocarbons present requiring sample dilution. California D.O.H.S. Cert. #1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for repod alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ~ 10:35 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): '08/15/2000 Sample ID: ENW-5-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/05/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantltation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) 530. mg/kg 100. Surrogate % Recovery 77. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: ~8/10/0200 @ 10:35 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample ID: ENW-5-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit. Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene 0.17 mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes 0.027 mg/kg 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 C14) 76. mg/kg 50. Surrogate % Recovery 100. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentration of target analytes requiring sample dilution. Chromatogram not typical of gasoline. C ali~~ StUart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-7 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:35 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: ENW-5-18 Date Analyzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.1 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 4. Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.1 Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98. 70-121 Toluene-d8 102. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 91. 74-121 Note: PQL's were raised due to high concentrations of hydrocarbons present requiring sample dilution. California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed m this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4t00 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661~327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratorie Inc. Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-8 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): '08/15/2000 Sample ID: WNW-6-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/02/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg 10. Surrogate % Recovery 115. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by DoO.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 ' ' -: . ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All cesults listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, 8C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no reSponsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-8 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 10:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample ID: WNW-6-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/18/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/18/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes None Detected mg/k~ 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 - C14) None Detected mg/k~ 1. Surrogate % Recovery 109. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.UoF.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ~~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this repod are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, 8C Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Coud * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * ('661~327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori , Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-8 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 10:45 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/23/2000 Sample ID: WNW-6-18 Date Analyzed: 08/23/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0.2 Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98. 70-121 Toluene-d8 103. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 90. 74-121 California D.O.H.S. Cert. ~1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661~327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 09/08/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000' SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-9 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 11:00 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8015M(d): '08/15/2000 Sample ID: B-7-18 Date Analyzed-8015M(d): 09/02/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel) None Detected mg/kg. 10. Surrogate % Recovery 106. % 30-158 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Stuart O. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this repod are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment of third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Coud * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * (6611327-4911 * Fax(661)327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Page 1 Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-9 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 @ 11:00 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted-8020: 08/19/2000 Sample ID: B-7-18 Date Analyzed-8020: 08/19/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Date Extracted-8015M(g): 08/19/2000 Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Date Analyzed-8015M(g): 08/19/2000 Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Toluene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Ethyl Benzene None Detected mg/kg 0.005 Methyl-t-butylether None Detected mg/kg 0.02 Total Xylenes None Detected mg/kg 0.01 Gasoline Range Organics (C5 - C14) None Detected mg/kg 1. Surrogate % Recovery 113. % 70-130 TEST METHOD: TPH by D.O.H.S. / L.U.F.T. Manual Method - Modified EPA 8015 Individual constituents by EPA Method 5030/8020. ~tua~t G. Buttram Department Supervisor All results listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc, assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Coud * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori , Inc. Page 1 Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA Method 8260) HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date Reported: 08/30/2000 2820 PEGASUS Date Received: 08/11/2000 SUITE 1 Laboratory No.: 00-09395-9 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 Attn: KEN MITCHELL 805-391-0517 Project Number: A041 Date Collected: 08/10/0200 ® 11:00 Sampling Location: APEX BULK COMMODITIES Date Extracted: 08/22/2000 Sample ID: B-7-18 Date Analyzed: 08/22/2000 Sample Matrix: Soil Sample Collected By: BRAD SKENFIELD Practical Analysis Reporting Quantitation Constituents Results Units Limit 1,2-Dibromoethane None Detected mg/kg 0 005 1,2-Dichloroethane None Detected mg/kg 0 005 t-Amyl methyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0 005 t-Butyl alcohol None Detected mg/kg 0 2 Diisopropyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0 005 Ethyl-t-butyl ether None Detected mg/kg 0 005 Quality Control Data Surroqates % Recovery Control Limits 1,2-Dichloroetha~le~d4 93. 70-121 Toluene-d8 101. 81-117 4-Bromofluorobenzene 89. 74-121 California D.O.H.S. Cert. $1186 Stuart G. Buttram Department Supervisor Alt results listed in this repofl are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com Laboratori , Inc. B C LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date of Report: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Sample Matrix: Soil SUITE 1 QC Batch ID: 200009395-3*BTX-TPH BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 KEN MITCHELL Samples Affected: 00-09395-3 - 00-09395-5, 00-09395-7 - 00-09395-9 I Method I I I I I ISpike :~ecl PrecisionlLCS ~ Rec I I Blank I [ NS I MSD ISpike I LCS I c°ntr°ll C°ntr°ll c°ntr°ll constituents I Readings lUnits IX Rec I% Rec IR.P.D. IX Rec I Limits I Limits I Limits Benzene I < 0.005 !mg/ka IIOS. 1109. I 1. I107. I SO - 1201 101 85 - Toluene I < O.OOS Imq/k. 1109. 1109. I O. 1106. I 80 - lZOI 101 SS - Ethyl Benzene I < 0.005 Ima/k~ 1103. 1103. I O. IIOS. I SO- lZOI 101 SS - .ethyl-t-butylether I < 0.02 Imq/k~ I1~. 1116. I ~- IllS. I SO - 1201 101 SS - p+m Xylenes { < 0.01 [m~/k~ [107. [107. I O. [106. [ so - 120[ 101 85 - 115[ o-X¥lene I < 0.005 Im~/k~ I101. 1102. I ~- IlOS. I 80 - 1201 101 Total Pet Hydrocarbon (gas) I < 1. Img/kg 1106. 1112. I 6. I1~0. I 80 - lZOI 101 85 - 115~ ~ I I I I I I I I I MS = Matrix Spike; MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate; RPD = Relative Percent Difference LCS = Laboratory Control Sample ~~Quatit Contr ~cer Anthony Bonanno All results listed in this repod are for the exclusive use of the submitting pady, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield. CA 93308 * (661~327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1916 * vcww,bclabs.com Laboratori , Inc. B C LABORATORIES OUALITY CONTROL REPORT HOLGUIN, FAHAN & ASSOC. Date of Report: 08/28/2000 2820 PEGASUS Sample Matrix: Soil SUITE 1 QC Batch ID: 200009395-6*BTX-TPH BAKERSFIELD, CA 93308 KEN MITCHELL Samples Affected: 00-09395-6 I Method I [ [ I I ISpike ~ecI PrecisionlLCS X Rec I Blank I I MS I .SD JSpike I LCS J Controt J ControlI Control Constituents J Readings JUnits J% Rec IX Rec IR.P.D.IX Rec I Limits J Limits J Limits Benzene I < 0.005 !m_~/ks J108. J109. J 1. 1112. J 80 - 120J lOJ 85 - 115J Toluene I < 0.005 imM/kg [109. [109. I O. 1110. I 80 - 1201 101 85 - 115~ Ethyl Benzene I < 0.005 !mg/kg [103. [103. I O. 1106. I 80 - 1201 101 85 - 115~ Methyl-t-but¥lether I < 0.02 !m~/kg [113. [116. I 3. II11. I 80 - 1201 101 85 - 115 p+m X¥lenes I < 0.01 [ms/ks 1107. 1107. I O. [112. I 8O - 1201 101 85 - 115~ o-Xytenes I < 0.005 Im~/kS 1101- 1102- I 1. II11. I 8O - 1201 101 85 - 115~ Total Pet Nydrocarbons [ < 1. Img/kg 1106- 1112- I 6. [108. I 80 - 120[ 101 85 - 115~ MS = Matrix Spike; MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate; RPD = Relative Percent Difference Anthony Bonanno Alt fesu{ts listed in this report are for the exclusive use of the submitting party, BC Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility lot report alteration, detachment or third party interpretation. 4100 Atlas Court * Bakersfield, CA 93308 * (661)327-4911 * Fax(661~327-1918 * www.bclabs.com 0 G '"0 C[ "~ 5 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page ~Clier~t Name~/¢EX .,~/~' Project Name Client ContacFPhone No. Send repo~ to: Contract Cod~O~/ C o~'¢'~ ~"~~'~ ~;~ Holguin, Fahan & Ass~iates, Inc. Sample~s Name '~¢~gn~/ Date Analyses Request,d, ,~ 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1 ,~ ~ ~ ~E~'~/~ ~~ ~~/~ ~f~'a ~ ~ , ~ ~ Bakersfield, CA 93308 · < ~ ~ ~. A~n: Matdx (soil, ~her Info tion No. and , ~ ~ ~ ~ HFA Date ~me ground water (e.g., ~mplingl~tion, depth, T~eof ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SPECIAL INS~UCTIONS Semele ~ Sampl~ Sampl~ air. water) soil ~dng or MW ~, etc.) Contatnem ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (i.e., turnaround time. etc.) ..... w"z' / x ESO '~'/~ / 0 r~ ~Sf.~5~ dM/e / 7' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ REQUIRED D~CTION LIMITS ~ ~ ~na ~ra C~n~ ~ SW~ see reverse for required det~ion limits ~mple Tem~m~re ~te ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ no ~ yes ~i~ ~ -¢ S~ ~ ~' ~ ~ All ~les stor~ overnight at HFA are ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ ~ ~-~ ., ~ reffigerat~ at 4~C. ~mples are trans~n~ to ' the la~to~ in ~lers fill~ ~th Blue IceTM ~ Delivered to HFA's refrigerator for tempora~ ~ storage on ~- / ~ OO R~~ (Initials) R~neuisn~ By: JSigna~r~O~ani~t~n) Dat~ ~ [ rgani~n) ~to~ Name & Ci~ =el~c~s~ 9v' ~Si~a~ur~O~anization) Dat~ime R~N~ B~: (Signat~r~Orga~iza~o~ =e~:~,:,~ec ~., ~g~a~ur~Organizati0n} 0at~ime Re~ived For Laborato~ By: (S~nature/O~anization) Include S~clal Hazards Here: Return sample(s)/cooler tO: Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc. · 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite 1, Bakersfield, CA 93308 · (661) 391o0517 · FAX # (661) 391-0826 HOLGUIN, ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 4. SOIL BORING AND MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES SOIL BORING AND WELL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES HAND-AUGERING PROCEDURES Each soil boring is manually drilled utilizing a 2-inch-OD hand auger manufactured by Xitech Industries. Soil samples are collected with a drive sampler, which is outfitted with 1.5-inch by 3-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are field screened for V©Cs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration is visually identified. All data is recorded on logs of exploratory boring under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Specific geologic and hydrogeologic Information collected Includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, structure, grain size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled in accordance with the procedures outlined in the State Water. Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with Holguin, Fahan & Associates, Inc.'s (HFA's) QA/QC procedures. The samples are transported in a chilled container to a California state-certified hazardous waste testing laboratory. TRUCK-MOUNTED DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Underground Service Alert of Northern California is notified at least 48 hours before drilling activities commence, Each soil boring is manually drilled for the first 4 feet to establish that the area is clear of subsurface structures. The soil borings are drilled with either a hollow-stem auger or an air rotary bit, and soil samples are collected with a California modified split-spoon sampler. The sampler Is outfitted with 2.5-inch by 6-inch stainless steel or brass sleeves. When the sample is withdrawn, the ends of the sleeve are covered with aluminum foil or TeflonTM tape followed by plastic caps. During the drilling process, soil cuttings are field screened for VOCs using a PID calibrated to 100 ppmv isobutylene. Any soil staining or discoloration is visually identified. All data Is recorded on logs of exploratory boring under the supervision of a state of California registered geologist. Soils are classified according to the USCS. Specific geologic and hydrogeologic information collected includes depth to groundwater, plasticity, density, stiffness, mineral composition, moisture content, soil type, structure, grain size, and other features that could affect contaminant transport. The samples are labeled, sealed, recorded on a chain-of-custody record, and chilled in accordance with the procedures outlined in the SWRCB's LUFT field manual. Sample preservation, handling, and transportation procedures are consistent with HFA's QA/QC procedures. The samples are Soil Boring Construction Procedures Page 2 transported in a chilled container to a California state-certified, hazardous waste testing laboratory. DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Before each sampling episode, the sampling equipment is decontaminated using a non-phosphate, soap and water wash; a tap water rinse; and two deionized water rinses. The drill string is decontaminated with a steam cleaner between each soil boring. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL The cuffrings from the soil borings are stored in 55-gallon, Department of Transportation (D©T)-approved drums. Each drum is labeled with the number of the soil boring from which the waste is taken and the date the waste was generated. The drums are stored at the site of generation until sample analytical results are obtained, at which time the soil is disposed of -appropriately. SOIL BORING COMPLETION PROCEDURES All soil borings are either properly abandoned or completed as a well. Abandonment Each soil boring that is not completed as a well is backfilled with bentonite grout, neat cement, concrete, or bentonite chips with a permeability less than that of the surrounding soils. The grout is placed by the tremie method. Well Construction Wells are designed according to Department of Health Services and State Water Resources Control Board guidance manuals. All well design and construction completed during the investigation are documented with the following information: · Date/time of construction; · Detailed drawing of well; · Drilling method and drilling fluid used; · Well development procedures; · Well location (+_5 feet); · Screen slot size/length; · Well depth (_0.1 foot); · Filter pack material and size; '· Drilling and lithologic logs; · Filter pack placement method; · Casing material; · Soil boring diameter and well casing diameter; · Screen material and design; · Sealant volume; · Casing and screen joint size; · Sealant placement method; · Type of protective cap; · Sealant materials; and · Top of casing or well cover · Surface seal design/construction. elevation (_+0.01 foot); Soil Boring Construction Procedures Page 3 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Well Surveying: The elevation of the monitoring well cover or top of well casing is surveyed to an accuracy of +_0.01 foot. All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. Well Development: Well development is conducted by simple pumping if bridging of the screen does not occur. If bridging occurs, well surging is conducted for adequate well production. Well surging is created by the use of surge blocks, bailers, or pumps, whichever method is most convenient at the time. Only formation water is used for surging the well, Well development continues until non-turbid groundwater is produced. All purged groundwater is held on site in covered 55-gallon DOT-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received. DATA REDUCTION The data compiled from the soil borings is summarized and analyzed. A narrative summary of the soil characteristics is also presented. The logs of exploratory borings are checked for the following information: · correlation of stratigraphic units among borings; · identification of zones of potentially high hydraulic conductivity; · identification of the confining formation/layer; · indication of unusual/unpredicted geologic features (fault zones, fracture traces, facies changes, solution channels, buried stream deposits, cross-cutting structures, pinchout zones, etc.); and · continuity of petrographic features such as sorting, grain-size distribution, cementation, etc. Soil boring/well locations are plotted on a properly scaled map. If appropriate, soil stratigraphy of the site is presented in a scaled cross section. Specific features that may impact contaminant migration (e.g., fault zones or impermeable layers) are discussed in narrative form and supplemented with graphical presentations as deemed appropriate, i-~--'~"~'~1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 5. MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Client Name APEX Bulk Commodities. Inc. Project Name Bakersfield Facility Site Address 2111 Bricyn Lane, Bakersfield, California Well No. MW-1 through MW-3 Date Completed Proposed Supervised by Mark R. Ma,gargee~ CHG~ RG 3OVER elevation of reference point ~4,500 feet above MSL GROUND SURFACE TOP WELL CAP depth of surface seal 2 fb,cj SURFACE SEAL type of surface seal Neat cement annular seal thickness 3 feet ANNULAR SEAL type of annular seal Cement grout Iow permeability seal thickness 3 feet Bentonite chips LOW PERMEABILITY SEAL type of Iow permeability seal diameter of well casing 2 inches type of well casing Schedule 40 PVC depth of top of gravel pack 8 fbg GRAVEL PACK type of gravel pack #3 sand -- GROUNDWATER depth of groundwater 18 fb~ ..~;, from reference point SCREEN depth of top of screen 10 fbg screen slot size 0.02 inch screen spacing size 0.5 inch depth of well 30 fb(] diameter of borehole 8 inches depth of borehole 30 fb~ ~ BOTTOM WELL CAP HO[,GOZN', Fza~[_,~i' & .-a~SOCIA']'I~S, ]'NC. 2820 Pegasus Drive, Suite · (661) 391-0517 Bakersfield, California 93308 ~ HOLGUIN, ~ FAHAN ~ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 6. WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES The regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the subject site is notified 48 hours prior to sampling. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Prior to purging the monitoring wells, water level measurements are collected according to the following procedures: * All wells are checked for floating product with an acrylic bailer or oil/water interface meter. · Water levels within each well are measured to an accuracy of _+[;].01 foot using an electric measuring device and are referenced to the surveyed datum (well cover or top of casing). · All wells are monitored within a short time interval on the same day to obtain accurate measurements of the potentiometric surface. · All measurements are reproduced to assure validity. PURGING PROCEDURES The monitoring wells are purged using either a submersible electric pump, bailer, hand pump, or bladder pump. A surge block is used if it becomes apparent during pumping that the well screen has become bridged with sediment or the produced groundwater is overly turbid. During the purging process, groundwater is monitored constantly for temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, odor, and color. These parameters are recorded on a water sample log. Purging continues until all stagnant water within the wells is replaced by fresh formation water, as indicated by removal of a minimum number of well volumes and/or stabilization of the above outlined parameters. Purge water is stored on site in 55-gallon Department of Transportation-approved drums until water sample analytical results are received from the laboratory, or the water is treated and disposed of on site. If permanent pumps are installed in the wells for groundwater remediation, the pumps are operated for at least 24 hours before sampling to ensure adequate purging. '- Well Purging and Gtc Sampling Procedures Page 2 SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURES Measurements collected in the field before sampling include water level, pH, conductivity, temperature, and turbidity (all in conformance with the Environmental Protection Agency's publication ""A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods"). Sampling is performed after the well recharges to at least 80 percent of hydrostatic water level. After purging and adequate recharge, groundwater samples are collected as follows: · A 1-liter TeflonTM bailer is lowered and partially submerged into the well water to collect a groundwater sample. · For volatile organic analyses, groundwater samples are collected in chilled, 40-milliliter, VOA vials with Teflon~M-lined caps. Hydrochloric acid preservative is added to all vials by the laboratory to lower sample pH to 2. Samples are held at a temperature of 4°C while in the field and in transit to the laboratory. Other appropriate containers, preservatives, and holding protocols are used for non-volatile analyses. RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVER~I%TION Actions Time Required to Complete Activity # Min: , PIRB DBPARTMENT FAX Transmittal To: COMPANY: ~,F"A FAX No: ~ q ~ - 0 g"2..~ " FROM: Office of Environmental Services FAX No. (8015) 326-0576 · Bu8 No. (805) 326-3979 1715 Chester Ave. · Bakersfield, CA 93301 ,___ t~OILS ENGINEERING, INC. -- Site Assesstnent Report & Retnedial Action Plan, Cladhatn Cotntnon Drive File No. 97-8144 ~ For Tract 5426~ T30S. R27E, Sec 6~ BakersfieM, California Page No. 10 -- A limited biotreatability study will be conducted on representative soil samples of the hydrocarbon impacted soil to ensure that bioremediation is possible at this site to the proposed cleanup levels. The soil will be evaluated for naturally occurring hydrocarbon degrading microbes and any toxic elements within the soil that might inhibit the ~ degradation of the hydrocarbons. The appropriate "recipe" will be determined to ensure the right mixture of microbes, nutrients, air, and moisture are present to expedite the degradation of the hydrocarbons. _ If' the biotreatability study is successful, the soil will be bioremediated by placing the hydrocarbon impacted soil into a biocell located on vacant land adjacent to the site. The "' biocell will be created by forming a 2 1/2 foot high soil berm around the perimeter of the _ biocell, placing 10 ml visqueen within the biocell draped over the soil berm. Six-inches of clean sand will be placed on the bottom of the visqueen to serve as a buffer zone between the visqueen and the hydrocarbon impacted soil. Approximately 18-inches of the -- hydrocarbon impacted soil will be placed upon the clean sand across the biocell. See Plate 8 for a diagram of a typical biocell. -- The soil within the biocell will be tilled weekly, fertilized, watered and covered to promote ~ the hydrocarbon degrading microbes within the soil. Soil samples will be collected periodically to evaluate the progress of the bioremediation process and the nutrient needs -- of the hydrocarbon degrading 'microbes.' Inoculation of microbes into the soil within the " -~, biocell will take place if naturally occurring hydrocarbon degrading microbes are not present or effective. When composite soil samples indicate the reduction of the hydrocarbons in the soil to approximately 200 parts per million oil and grease and TPHd, -' the soil will be considered bioremediated and used as fill material on or off-site. The on-site area that will be used for the biocell will be enclosed with chain link fencing for the duration of the project to prevent public access. The estimated time for the full bioremediation of the soil is 4 to 6 months. -- Petroleum Impacted Groundwater Groundwater Removal -- SEI proposes to pump groundwater out of the resulting excavation in the area of the -- highest groundwater contamination (MW-l). Pits will be dug approximately 5 feet deeper than the excavation and a submersible pump attached to a hose extending to the surface will be placed into the pit~ Groundwater will be pumped out of the pits into large Baker -- tanks for storage. The excavation will be pumped down approximately 3 times or until a _ significaat decrease in groundwater contamination is evident (odor and or analysis). Mixing Tank To Water Soum~ Pump (20 gal/min) Berm Of Hay Bales Or Soil Covered With Liner 3/4" PVC Pi 10 mil Liner /' )rinkler Covered with 6-inches of clean soil PLATE SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. .-~. 4700 District Blvd. ~1 Bakersfield, CA 93313 ' ' ' DATE: 4/25/97 BIOREMEDIATION CELL PROJEOTNUMBER: 8144 05/12/00 10:17 '~661 326 0576 BFD HAZ MAT DIV ~001 *** ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 5997 CONNECTION TEL 3910826 CONNECTION ID START TIME 05/12 10:15 USAGE TIME 01'35 PAGES 3 RESULT OK 81/26/2888 13:41 7~02467654 APEX BUD< COMMOD PAGE Apex A~I~, ~ 9~1 ~an~ 26, 2000 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services C/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 At, n: Mr. Howard H. Wines Dear Mr. Wines; Enclosed are the New Landowner Notification and Participation Requirement forms you had requested. I will fax these to you also. If you have any questions please contact me at: 800-767-3401 ext. 2151 (~..l~mpliance Manager 01/2G/2000 13:41 7GO2467654 APEX BULl< COHMOD PAGE 82 Sample Lctt~ (3) Notice of Proposed Action Submitted to Local Agency Date: January 17, 2000 City of Bakers~ld Fire Departmem Office of Environmental Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Notice of Proposed Action Submitted to Local Agency for APEXBULK .COMMODITiES,.INC. Site name 2111 BRYCIN BAKlgRSFIE~D. CA. 94~01 Site address In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, 1, 5t$¥, Gale, certify that I have notified all Name of primary responsible party responsible landowners of the enclosed proposed action. Check space for applicable action(s): ~ cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) site closure proposal local agency intention to make a determination that no further action ks required. local agency intention to issue a closure letter. Signature of primary responsible party St~ve Gal~ Name ofprima~ responsible party CC: (Names and addresses of all record fee title owners) 01/9G/2000 13:41 ?E~O24E~?E,~4 APEX BULK ClDMMOD PaGE Sample Letter (2): List of Landowners Form Date: January 17, 2000 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Certified List of Record Fee Title Owners for APEX BULK COMMODITIES. INC, 2111 ]~RYCIN BAKERSFIELD. CA, 93301 Site name Site address Fill out item 1 if there are multiple site landowners. If you are the sole site landowner, skip item I and fill out item 2. 1. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Chapter 6.7 oft]he Health & Safety Code, 1, Steve Gale Name of primary responsible party certify that the following is a complete list of current record fee title owners and their mailing addresses for the above site: R S & D Enterprises, LLC 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, Ca. 92301 2. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible p~rty certify that I am the sole landowner for the above site. Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible party Sieve G#le Name of primary responsible party February 14, 2000 Steve Gale R S & D Enterprises, LLC 12531 Violet Road Adelanto CA 92301 RE: Apex Bulk Commodities, 2111 Bricyn Ln., Bakersfield, CA FIRE CHIEF RON FRAZE Dear Mr. Gale: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 'H'Street Our records indicate that your former underground storage tank site ~akersfie~,~,CAe3301 is currently subject to Corrective Action Requirements under Article 11 of VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX(661)395-1349 Title 23 California Code of Regulations concerning leaking underground tanks. SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 'H" Street ~akersfie~, CA 93301 Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2722(b) of Article 11, you are VOICE(661)326-3941 hereby directed to begin the necessary work at your site within 90 calendar FAX (661) 395-1349 days from the date of this letter. The required work shall include: PREVENTION SERVlCF..S 1715ChesterAve. Either: 1) Excavation and off-site disposal of the diesel contaminated Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE(661)3,?.6-3951 soil and installation of ground water monitoring wells on site. FAX (661) 326-0576 Or, 2) On site treatment of the soil in accordance with requirements ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES for a Class II Waste Management Unit (WMU) pursuant to title 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA93301 27 of the California Code of Regulations, including a 40 mil VOICE (661) 326-3979 liner, leachate monitoring and collection system, and FAX (661) 326-0576 hydrogeologic assessment of the WMU itself, in addition to TRAINING DIVISION the groundwater monitoring of the release site. 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VO~CE(~I)3~4s9? Please be aware that, pursuant to Section 2722(c) of Article 11, you FAX(661)399-5763 are required to have an approved workplan on file with this office prior ~o initiation of any corrective action work. In addition, you are to provide ongoing status reports of all activities involving the progress of this case to this office every 90 days. If you have any questions regarding the provisions of this letter, · please call me at (661)326-3979. Sincerely, Howard H. Wines, III Hazardous Material Specialist Office of Environmental Services HHW/mv cc: M. Magargee, HFA S:\FEB 00~ApexBulkComm. ~ 12531VioletR~L gu Adelanto, CA 92301 Telephone (760) 246-6077 ,January 26, 2000 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services C/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Attn: Mr. Howard H. Wines Dear Mr. Wines; -- - .... Enclosed are the New Landowner Notification and Participation Requirement forms you had requested. I will fax these to you also. If you have any questions please contact me at: 800-767-3401 ext. 2151 )//~.9~ I-l[einze .Mbmpliance Manager Sample Letter (3) Notice of Pro Action Submitted to Local Agency Date: January 17, 2000 City of Bakersfield Fire Departmem Office of Environmemal Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 ~i-- -----Nb~-i~-6-fP3o--~-d-~fi~ffS~bhSitted-~ Eo-c~il A/gen~/¢ f6Y~-- A~PEX~BUL~K-COMMO'DITIES; I'NC.-- .... Site name 2111 BRYCIN BAKERSFIELD~ CA. 93301 Site address In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, 1, Steve Gale, certify that I have notified all Name of primary responsible party responsible landowners of the enclosed proposed action. Check space for applicable action(s): XXX cleanup proposal (corrective action plan) site closure proposal local agency intention to make a determination that no further action is required. local agency intention to. issue a closure letter. Sincere~~ Signature of primary responsible party Steve Gale Name of primary responsible party CC: (Names and addresses of all record fee title owners) Sample Letter (2): List of Landowners Form Date: January 17, 2000 City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services c/o Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, CA 93301 RE: Certified List of Record Fee Title Owners for APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC. 2111 BRYCIN BAKERSFIELD, CA. 93301 Site name Site address Fill out item 1 if there are multiple site landowners. If you are the sole site landowner, skip item I and fill out item 2. 1. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Chapter 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, 1, Steve Gale Name of primary responsible party certify that the following is a complete list of current record fee title owners and their mailing addresses for the above site: R S & D Enterprises, LLC 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, Ca. 92301 2. In accordance with section 25297.15(a) of Ch. 6.7 of the Health & Safety Code, I, Name of primary responsible party certify that I am the sole landowner for the above site. Sincerely, Signature of primary responsible party Steve Gale Name of primary responsible party ~ ~" ~ .~ ~ ·. · T ....... J 12531 Violet Rd. Apex IMllK ommoal le5, mc. Telepho~ (760) 2~0~ City of Bakersfield Fire Department Office of Environmental Services C/O Ralph E. Huey, Director 1715 Chester Avenue, Suite 300 Bakersfield, Ca 93301 Attn: Mr. Howard H. Wines Hazardous Material Specialist Dear Mr. Wines, This letter is in response to the telephone conversation we had about the extension dead line on the completion of the Bakersfield Terminal site contamination. A Proposal was forwarded to the Owners of Apex Bulk Commodities to bring this matter to a close in the very near future. It is my recommendation that we hire an outside contractor to remove, clean and refill the area to 90%. If you need any further ioformation please feel free to contact me at 760-246-6077 ext. 2151 nce Mana~ier ---- _._--------~-------~._------------'-~ ---- . --.---. -------. - - -.---. ----" -. --- ---.- ---------.---- - FIRE CHIEF ,,?ON f"?<E .. --- -.-- -- ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 852-2170 SUPPRESSION SERVICES 2101 "H" Street Bakersfield. CA 93301 VOICE (661) 326-3941 FAX (661) 852-2170 PREVENTION SERVICES fiRE SAfETY SERVICES' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES . 900 Truxtun Ave.. Suite 210 Bakersfield, CA 93301 VOICE (661 326-3979 FAX (661) 852-2171 FIRE INVESTIGATION 1715 Chester Ave. Bakersfield, CA 9330J VOICE (661) 326-3951 FAX (661) 852-2172 TRAINING DIVISION 5642 Victor Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 VOICE (661) 399-4697 FAX (661)399-5763 _~__..__~.___~~~~_"__~_____.____.....- v. __ October 19, 2004 Mr. John M. Noonan, Senior WRC Engineer California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 1685 E Street Fresno, CA 93706-2020 RE: Recent Case Closures in the City of Bakersfield: Former Holden Truck Plaza, 3775 Buck Owens Blvd ~~1~ Dear Mr. Noonan, On behalf of this Department and the City of Bakersfield, we thank you for your diligence and assistance in overseeing the remedial activities to completion at the above referenced Underground Storage Tank (UST) release sites. From the time of our referral to your Board (that groundwater was determined to be impacted) to your case closure, was less than four years at each site. Your expedience is particularly noteworthy because there are two other groundwater investigation sites in the City where Kern County, as the holdover Local Oversight Program (LOP) agency, is now wen into their 17th year of oversight on those two other sites. The contrast in clean-up response times is noteworthy and you and your staff should be commended. We appreciate the close working relationship between our agencies and look forward to the completion of other successful projects in the future. .__ _" ,.._~ v__ ~_ __.. ,..._ ~_._. _,_.....,_~~_.__~__~_...._"'.~___~...._____ ._---~ ------',,-- - .,.".. ._~---_......,,"-- _."-,~-<-- --'---- cc: J. Whiting, CV-RWQCB L. Haven, SWRCB REH:db ({ _C/7 C29 - /j . - jl.l:/' N Q./è/jt/l/Ùm I/I(! "fþ;J/IJIHW/lU'{11 (ì~().Jt QUOFP 0'/hf.NI Q[.(' T(!(Hlllúlt.11 ~ ~ I~ ·)' California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair a Terry Tamminen Secretary for Environmental Protection Fresno Branch Office Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/-rwqcb5 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706-2020 Phone (559) 445-5116' FAX (559) 445-5910 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor 13 October 2004 RWQCB Case No, 5T15000820 Mr. Jim Fuller Apex Bulk Commodities, Inc. 12531 Violet Road Adelanto, California 92301 . UIT ~ II I f:j<..IC YN CASE CLOSURE - UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY This letter confirms the completion of a site investigation and corrective action for the underground storage tanlc formerly located at the above-described location, Thank you for your cooperation through out this investigation, Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tanlcs are greatly appreciated, Based on the information in the above-referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank site is in compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.3 ofthe Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release at the site is required. A summary of the information in the above-referenced file is included in the Case Closure Summary, a copy of which is enclosed, This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, Please contact Mr. John M. Noonan at our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, THOMAS , INKOS Executive Officer Enclosure cc: Mr. Howard Wines Ill, City of Bakersfield Fire Department, Bakers~ Ms. Barbara Rempel, UST Cleanup Fund, Sacramento Mr. Mark Magargee, Central Sierra Environmental, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection Agency o Recycled Paper 1 ~ California Regional Water Quality Control Board ~ Central Valley Region Robert Schneider, Chair Terry Tamminen Secretary for Environmental Protection Fresno Branch Office Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5 1685 E Street, Fresno, Califomia 93706·2020 Phone (559) 445-5116' FAX (559) 445-5910 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor TO: JOHN M. NOONAN Senior WRC Engineer FROM: JOHN D. WHITING Engineering Geologist DATE: 13 October 2004 SIGNATURE: tlttA/71/ J3: 1tJ~ - -----~--------~---~--,....--_._~----~~---_. -'-~~-' --.---------. I------~--~---- SUBJECT: CASE CLOSURE SUMMARY, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE, APEX BULK COMMODITIES, INC., 2111 BRICYN LANE, BAKERSFIELD, . KERN COUNTY Background Information The site formerly utilized one 12,000-gallon diesel underground storage tame (UST) and one fuel . dispenser island. The site is approximately 0.5 mile north of the Kern River. Depth to groundwater. ranged from 36 to 46 feet below ground surface (bgs) during 2001-2002 and approximately 18 feet bgs during 1999, Groundwater flow in the site vicinity is toward the north. The diesel UST system was removed under the supervision of the City of Bakersfield Fire Department (CBFD) during January 1999. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) concentrations up to 17,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg or parts per million) were reported from samples collected beneath the western end of the UST. Benzene concentrations of 0.4 mg/kg or less, toluene and ethylbenzene concentrations less than 7 mglkg and total xylene concentrations less than 35 mg/kg were _ _ _also detected, - The-fuel oxygenatemethyl-tert-butyl-ether-(-M'FBE) was-detected-at-concentrations-less- than 0.6 mg/kg. Site assessment was conducted during August 1999, Diesel range hydrocarbons were detected to 17 feet bgs in soil samples collected from near the western end ofthe former UST and north of the former UST, TPH-d up to 30,000 mg/kg and benzene up to 0,56 mg/kg were detected, The lateral extent of impacted soils was determined south and southwest of the former UST, Groundwater samples were collected from temporary well points constructed in each soil boring, TPH-d concentrations up to 80,000 micrograms per liter (ug/L, parts per billion) were detected in the groundwater samples, Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of soil were excavated from the area surrounding the former UST to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs during August 2000. The excavation appeared to reach the limit of impacted soil, except in portions of the northern and eastern walls. A TPH-d concentration of 5,400 mg/kg was detected in a sample collected from the center of the eastern wall. A TPH-d concentration of California Environmental Protection Agency ~ ~~ Recycled Paper , ~ßex Bulk Commodities Closure Summary - 2 - 13 October 2004 f .~ 530 mglkg was detected in a sample collected from the eastern half of the northern wall. A TPH-d concentration of280,000 µg/L and a benzene concentration of 9.4 µgIL were detected in a groundwater sample collected from the base of the excavation, The CBFD referred the case to the Regional Board for regulatory oversight by a letter dated 28 November 2000. Three groundwater monitoring wells were installed during July 2001 and three groundwater monitoring events have subsequently been performed. TPH-d was detected at concentrations up to 2,100 µg/L during the initial (23 August 2001) monitoring event and was detected at 240 µg/L during the last (26 March 2002) monitoring event. TPH-d was not detected in the downgradient monitoring well during two of the three monitoring events. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and the fuel oxygenates MTBE, tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), di-isopropyl ether (DJPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), and the lead scavengers 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) were not detected duriIig the monitoring history. The site is within an area of commercial properties and vacant land parcels. Domestic water is supplied by City of Bakersfield municipal water system. Two municipal wells and several inactive water wells are within 1,000 feet of the site. The municipal wells draw water from depths in excess of300 feet bgs, Conclusions I conclude that the total mass of residual hydrocarbons remaining in subsurface soils is small. Low concentrations of diesel range petroleum constituents remain in shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the former UST andhave'not migrated off-site, 'Benzene, ethylbenezene, xylenes, the fuel oxygenates, and the' lead scavengeré.~s were not detected during three groundwater monitoring events. Since the source of the release and most of the impacted soils have been removed, and residual hydrocarbon concentrations remaining in soil and groundwater have not migrated off-site, and are unlikely to pose a significant risk to potential environmental receptors, I recommend that a standard underground tan1c site closure letter be mailed to the responsible parties. I also recommend that the groundwater monitoring wells remaining on-site be properly destroyed if they are not to be maintained for future use and that drums containing drill cuttings and purge water be removed for disposal. V:\UGT\Projects\JDW _1ìIes\2004 Correspondence\City of Bakersfield Cases\ApexBulkClsrMmo 9-04.doc